Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA89-055 o
�THER •
N
o pt
,, >Rp p G:c 14 IN'
0- s- -t -0 ,N .
S� EeuR-
1M 7-----------------
site TRAN Q cc
•
:imeowpw
5 W G�ADY Wp,. .
r ............. u)
tp ____.—
s-T ....----------- ' % .-----. NN\
Lu.e.-----------vq---------"--2 _____----____ . . 7 .-------. \\
. __ow.-- . ...___________5______------- _________________ ____ -_--
o a � 1
si-
____--- 7-O 0
Z 5 13th ...-------
� ¢ (I) W ....______2_ ,_
405 H
7
NORTH
� ` "\ficinity ap , 6� � PLANNING nzz1e/
____ .••
I
..‘ • a
. mevems .4
. .
151,61.4--1,4.`TF-SIA‘L.-f7A...F... ...
. 6,141.4.4E.¢...ry f[Pik{
4.
E 5..!".. Per../.1‘......./ -,-- 1 ".e.,.,.. ..e...., _
,r- 19.4,4-
te,ru-weeerze......weee.,1' ere., zero., L.-.7../
•
-7,14ueee e7.14-r-4.Of
Nore.-to Glue '
r_it, r
a•rfo I.A,TY-E....1.-wm.2,_ E,-pl..,..-. MET,/M.,E.1",.14,-:-
r ,, ) flEar., 9.,...".-. rtg-g44-.,
FrqzVer.t-oex.-, ret MIi-L P11,-,4 r11.4--F,Ge....1,,,E
4.11,g,44,1P, *-6,....... rE4-1,1,1-1 (.4..•ow.e.,x,C,1"..,..
r, fr.,FiA,, fr14,•,..o...e.,1 •
eee..."1...,133421•7--nnzense h•le...- . VW-pl.....1 MET,...09..n. .
- "
rwegu-w e-Hteear.,1",-e-fpi-E. S.z••••- Per.91-e.-1 ,,,,,i-r"-P.r....E.
Ft-goew-iti-R-
zereel.
J. ..7 P-s'.:411-1E.Pitazushacr-I, ire-0 - fror-0.....1 /
1.. • . ,.....2.4e-rit-e- 6e,re p-V."1.-13.0,4
•`•-•',.../ .
‘29f,
1 - - -- 1 14",:
L . ."".•• L.,,,ry•ra,Jr rva=17-4..4-.iv Fia-e-frE. :•1.-tit-v.4.-
1,...,4T,p4....no-1-14.9re.* 1.1&fri7 V1,1,1,,1.41.E.47 00.1.4.e.i7.
1....,...-1.....,Me.-"VP.A.A.., ..5.04......-"es rw...e......rrg,1,....11......•-•.4.•.,,,, ,,,,,,..f.a,....,,,,,,,,,9 ;
P.11,1.4,..m.....14,a,C.U....4417 111 ,"',/'",TE-M. L.T..,...v._-fa v.,NI-.
EVEIZAM.f...4.111,-Ab".7 WA,14.5.14147..erme-e-.711
Ire*.1•az,ents.4.e.evser- 5.1.44.4.-.61rAI7-1 41-
....dieW4m614 Ass,can. ..rrg
..io 41.....1.1c
..., I
.tr.r Lille,
, / - - lak.il,„.to. , % 4. A. i 1
)
, Nic I ii , .... - ..... , ......mk... ....,4741
"Tar •
7
. ..a.?-_
- 4 .0--...jr....,,A1.5. 4.47 - . . .
. /
,
4qe.+11vrAlat-W.iefeli 4141.1.1 I ; 1 ;
lip I I I 1
, .ZI•-s 1
fr.conci,..new or M..4940.17
ditt ! .81
1 VA45*.I ACI.e...tri i 14ZE {Ar .
e
/
02 Ew-r.mr.r.....AIV,a,s 427.X.,G144.T.rff. '0 1, "
. i
/
4R
, 7),__. •9, . 1.1rTIA 1..1.411.6.7.1
4g
11411,1itai.47FIG.46 ; / tily
• s-r..;ii,,ta I i - . •
' ....-
/ / <
!
oi-le-51-Ort-T Ittilo-ii, 13LIIL.P[1.14-12,,000 sr f . ..0 k•I 1 'in 1
i ,..ii uapix etia.9143,surea..1A Li.l.s.e.i..m.le.
• •
i413 03 0
N..
/
(...• - / /
1006710cl...1,-By(,,,) . -
.
/ -- .
.
- .
-
.
"
II'7"P'.2A PLANNING DIVIS!bN
•
• z, 1,1e..f...proAL- 1-Ai-117Y-XAI'V- 121. N
• CITY OF RENTON
---.) •• D.1 MAY
M 2 2 1989
..e.,..,...7-
. ... f-- --i--;:o 17 1 .r . •—rat
. 1, . L 1.
. . .. •I••••• "
- .
V�EHAILLEMEp�T12SION5 EXISiIN61 LFFIoE$LlILDIr1Ll/
/ .
INSPE!/flaN SrAtla�.
I
j S.W. 61 KAIT' WA'{
E 513.1y LDRe,[WIVE Clod RPW 7)pc19v/4
AND GDEWALK cDIRslST) Q 6TRWT IgXT /
V i I
�N OM0,„ �15'W LANDNLADED K D R[I�v6WA-�(zs`w) ;g w.,. '
INSTµLED!1"I.INTAI ED g
PDSPLENT PR/PF"Itt`f OWNER. 941't /
(1
�t-5' W LANDSGAGINy (5O7o*SW Gil XN)-yrri _-0' O I I I
--1 0 /
NWMi4Ncy. te,' / -DI v H. Re., 1 1 v
5 tY L L.o7 R¢Nt01-! w®st /
TQ�/ I NEW LNR9(yT cn in cn 1 a` ExlSrw OFn LOS-� 3
<0 �I AND DRNEWa.Y C2s'w) qq
}k QI - N tZ ryARKIN4 VETERIIYRt GUNIL. �n
1 CLRE2WN.L 6Ocu2Rr - - — 9B SPALFI>J - - III t y•
11C/
2_ :t - 1
_ T 4 I � _ n_J >
QNI _ o _
' 2 1 ,�. ,o• � Q 3
Ir f NSW olJ✓-5�+3 - ----------- uv re
o�
3 1 1 � r1---- IINDEi P_111LDINy
W/uNDER BUILDINy 51407Ny POJCKINq(25 5PAL65)
I RM."( SFRJNK+.ERFa 2D' - i- N `�
�.
N .ROLKEtT DXIG111I ALLEY(IL'w� 0 srnwl
D wev. a.4.w)
I .
\ E'XISTINbI PARKA-1t1 La7
.ALORN Lu9rorl
rr-D16G7 pA7A
y LAEINGTRY =q;aSTpFH®tElz1�". _.13iOg7SF_j✓-!<.{��BpP.I�-511Lg1�lF:pl..7if[�
\ -- ."- --12F3O_.i_EEER-LL'P-E-F__xG[iall, - ptlIP.-I -
/ NaI TI4 \ =Trlr =elm+ -- = zaa_sF_-r>=c�wslto¢�Ax.A)--- -...------
1/ I'tz�LIM1NAR1 SITS rI,AN --_=_-_-----: _
O PERIHETER LANDSGAPINLI -
111v201_Lo V.o4/a9 ALL+4a LIR P' WAY'
RE/. 5/I/el 1REDNL5D DY 50% -.5'W.(1120 5F)
Rev. 6/12/ey ©INTERIOR LANDGLAPIN4
Rev 7/2a/e9 REaNIRED FOR 50%
EdwardA I SLIITE2 5457O8TM NE RIiDNLTION • c12ii PRE,XliROM RED •
/11YIS1{IIIInf1 BEn.LLE&IE WAem 12�7 PRovI DED
ONEI2d51454.059O ©yeEENxLT PFIDsuPluq I'IzLIh III-NARY DRA1n/II-IG�
2%OF LOT...ADP -
321e30 SFt..Oa :bB75F RE4NIRFA ---Iw'"'T�I�{-- - {� _-__
657 SF PROVIDED yv^I'^
L .
/12/B9
Rev -7/2!i/e°I
II I
6 F' „.i,ti
},-
. 1
•
_,.....,+w. { ---, ,,....,.....i..._,........ - -1 I-W+�t,7a Aro.-- i - InrtixJa�um - f __p..+.Muasnrl -- rt+w* '
0
ii L0:7L.LprlNµl[ i 'BLS .I f1+LDNR-
.-(4)wrlw.ori rr�eeuJg I; .. '� p ��
iI - 7fl ®
- III -(41L+rIFi.cr IVi....,WA i. (4)rlM,3„.aneenly i I �l.�/!T -�'�-
9 I � g = raFcatl' dI i
'
ir I O II -- F VTA`I✓-4JI'i_. SFS SF-! _ __'1O AaTI votL 6.44�tYi1Y`
I Fy "- _ 5F - - �� - r 1 I = Y W.iL - '� __DCf0.AM4 M
•
—T AY4'1nnEr - iRToI-17.491 - --- I 1 -,1"Wig !rnur I I.
• IIII t O I Ze.
L.,,' id zd is,' id 20' Le' zd 20 _ 20
O
` ` ` 0 0 ` zd
I %.
O O O ® © ® . O m II 12 = 13 -44Y;' G n ��y >r I(i 0
.
-Pi CANING � i�;sv
-- - - CITY OFRENTON .
�,- p;F.k�l)•l1lJPRY GRaWli-1Ci
_,,lo�cw-.- a 1989 IZNfio� -Iezp.l,
. 0 - �.Ir11 N�K�f FIRST .F�oo i',.A�-1 12, i ICY. 2 2
G!a/81 -
j 40 =a
=o' t-1..
i
I
I
.I I
I
I I
0— — — ® Q Q O © Q O Q =sa• So II 9 So Q
zc' zo' _` 2...2... zo' I I zo' 1 zo• zo' 1 ze' , zo' 1 zap zo' zo• _'
, I ---.., iLG.la� r i�sor wca.+a
I - - I_ �mc - I i -7----i— fr.,'si cst r�x
(f> . I
rme� IlmD•
•
1 a J,- - 4 4 G 4 la �� �I i2 H 14 mill. : q I R zo ]I iza _ ibis _ zc 24 _
T
__1___[_
__ I -- I I _ _ ___. 1 ;il -- — -- -- _
'_la.l�.��lu.vWn
- p.L 1- -r Gl'-Wow) __ __
_ PLANNING DIVISION
. CIT1'.OF I�ENTON
,o ._ > L� t-> Y- �o� : 1=- oo osr+ D MAY 2 2 1989 IMI{JARI' DIZAWII—LA
K1-lTOh1 RWfpIL
i
- 6/IV iii
p(ThRIDR GDI.DRS
61JE00-1.-,0 1
-'1" ✓-".C� H-OVtO.WNIN4-OhRCdJ1E -
Z'ly� VE0TIUL AWNIN4: RAC DLIJ6
r1J/ P.RK��4 _ L14NT WU/.SleliE - hV'/NIN4 �� 046
�,/l-�`lrJ � hWHIN4 - ivo¢t GOTTM W� /HYXLH IMM;N4 ....
SI NA4G F.F.L. / I.11KNG+/To TL:AiJ�1 -p MRK BLtI
4 _- 1 ,O AVNING
Oi -A.:.
. . l ` _ - l4. . '40'' - -� ..I \ - stir""'. - -
iii
; 1 I I I. ' - '1 � -�11 .--. ' 1 ] rHf
iMO I . I ! I '
I :,:lI I I/1 i II I I , /—' IJ . r1, 1 - I! ri' GLI ^
RaJTeS.� �1...0¢INL I
1Jo-{e...: -TWJ,y.IT 4.1aj4.oq TO eb LII•irttD
TO sal. OF STOREFRO1JT..INSa.F0071.01( Weiw>51.t5
_ .10 t+L.0J1 FIWW.4
FM1-1M1 KY I-IDIZTH L VP,?I o1-1 —
v„..,e' .- sh/CI
R6+.6/^J/e61
RGV. )I2IM .
•
•
.CITY OF RENTON
s�
�- �. MAY 2 2 1989. "i i ,'I
!°RE{.1).111-IARY DRAW INIa1 _.
` n�] C �F 1?ON Rl;"fAIL r
. • .
u Q
5/./D'1
1 1 I .
eN.W4 u.u—�` _ - 1 .Fi I
/...Fre".7oIJr
�, I .. .. e r-.NN6-) - -
+� k k . IRK NNiJ - >✓� •
- I.107R LI.F6- . �y7 \ it l i� -- ! ._ T'T 171 . IPARIr-IF.161 .\
( r 1
I I eg
�ivdl
f IZ�I,I I p`RT DRAW
c/12/B'I
_ . PLANNING DIVISION
CITY.OF-RE�TO�i
��i Y 2 2 1989 p;iii i._
: {',' _,
_,. •_
. . .
•
, .
. . . r(� c
s11 � _
vJ 1'a.D'-LJNH"
DET
• ��Ililll��
1 [
11 _%---
I I i I I .
II .
SToMPIL0141 J R -- flR6J(F14101,.
pE(OND
. -W/J.I w/RAILING, WOLK-CP{4. N.LEY
y,/ '( L .V A?I o i—I
�RIDALiD fL. I11s
BDYOr.I
�
l
FItl'-f---
......
RM' _9 t Fi FLO/R� .
, , .
I.LLCC C.XH Mi-LOF17 - - .
CIF Rif-011ii0)
PLANNiNr: D: 1 iJ
eN e�.�i is i b t.:i "6`'
CITY 0F RETON
A•s� �L�v�-rt o-I D MAY 2 2 1989 ran: F
- _ VD".Il•O' 6/1x/d1 f F'rD1—I R "fP,tl.
. /1Zie,
•
ft-
7------'rri s' icatuuauir.
r /'icF I I
r' T
w,�.p.� -.,.a 9 (A1L SHOPS i
,� I1 E:w.O. I
rru+Iw.. k
S.W. GRADY WA; w..�,--
�� - F arf srrx15�c�o"oG` "- I .�F.ar.._ w.rK,6 1 Hi
d
SF__cT1oN=-sue-a
1 �T �cfBJ�BY V
11 PLA,IVA17r1,r ,; _,
ut. r; .
-- C/ Y U C
1 el r•�9� iv;,
SW-EsFJmX�all.Y iIL r �Wf Gc�oa '_' .� I �� L �V��
Ma-II-II1-1aR-r PRawiaJry
- Re4NTaN RlaAll.
j1crl[�l�l _ 'A A
_ siI2./ 1
•
t . r.-1,1 —.- , -1 f.....
II r
II 16,26.1
•
ER9.c."'_'^TaZi \"..".a.a.._ _ C --. -.sr/
. - - -- - ( ( 'Wsr--""T960�1' I�I ...... ___---
.. 1 i! .:
SCSI oN--_�c=G jj'' r—
__ l/Ii �j! s i dTl l'
• . r4AY 2 2 �:989
. [•
y.
\ • t' I.IMINAR7 bRAwlNci.
RpNToIJ - Rr'AIL
•
00
- . -- - snz�e,
0 . 0
, •
. MOM= VI
. .
• •
- .
•. .
. •
, . l
A .
. .
. .
. . •
. .
q . . .
. .
/
• .
. . - .
. . - •
•
I .
.i /
- -• .
- . . i
- ! . 4.•W. 6t1ZADY Nikht..-( i
r W . ' • :LT, w
. Lertri 14.4.040/1110. ...'
iaj -: NZ:,ROW)
"
. - /
I _...........•
.. .
to . 1: .
.........,... \ ,.. r______3..
.0
---4.j? .1. "i;-''zr-2..., ____Ti—;, •-77-------__—_—_ ____----------- ..- z.../--- ,..--.5 7
___ i . __.._ -----_____ ________ . :
:, .
_—...„
....„_:_t
--- ,---- c.,w .....wa.......w... ,,,,,.....,,,,..-, ,„,..- -- /
,.., lirt
1 ,', ::Ljj%' i ''' 14 — . 1...,-____.--------------, . , i.
•
• .
am -ea I I
eredeN' • • •
1.-4,.., __.--------'..- ' )--..;.."2.11— I
i ' Alba ete:11. • , T N if 7___
- 1.
) _: -
0.1.....45. i / i
4.4.1 1 ..-......-. ./... ,_.:1
f ./...---- .-.....c.:-.11.7.....C."4°7,.. \-....-c .— _
rx14-litztary.4. ,i 4 •
Er- >
. .
(
* :•,. Fe . FJe ..,.....r ."".."c".. ..\ ..... . e/
1 111 ifill 44- 0
....------.....„\HPOI 0i4t..4TylitY itirCall- Mill.PI 1-14-1*,,000 Sr t
/——\ ' •
' 1-7
.,
m ,,,-
- — gem r,•,- __s--...._____W-Liacort Buikplik.10.001.14 'Wee.0......JA _
1....1 4005.....ea .- • /...,4 •
0 _....... .„,,„,., .....(L....A.
.,.. ,. •
- • VI.,2
,
•fee siereFeen P.,.
--sitadiardand .... ....,—..--P.' '' '".•'"""" .--.. littis11,1,4- f I
----.-- .....eca Faue......•IS .........,„IV.
._,.,_ F- - • .
• _
---„,.7__-1367-Jir-L.GLIW-firgill:ANALI-. • -
. ..
. tt 177 1 7:7_43.-- \ - - •
-..... .
. .
t rr g
A
LEGEND
... 6
P LANN ING
11r1IN IAf ,A214 11 --t r. ..1 = \GITYOF c DEIN 'SOINO 0 ii..quo -E •,
• __ p Itge.tagor...xi(9•1) • - . --
- .
' •-
4.T.421r.L.IMPlak MAY D
.__ ..
0.-ser-4...... .- 14 A Y 2 2 1989 ,, 1
- • .
_ —••••--E..57: WAX.%••••••..1
• . i 1
, . - . - - , . PS112 pr_AT, •••••••• I-) -
. . •
, p r-r-,) 7_ p T,F-- .7-
; .
C, (t, 1: ' -
-! •,.., t_ , :., . . . - (:„.1
, -:
1AEGER ENGINEERING .
iiiiisitEsi4st. AdirkVia-B8002.,."..(208,1131F.418915 .- - . I., .F.
. _ .
•
•
•
SW-5 Horn[ �I-
'aVVyiw�clf�,,I15iuJf 6t.V5.Iq LIFIGS 5.,..1.JN.
ric SPile.1.
•
/ ..,
C • - i
S.W. A I.Ab ' wAY /
/ I��NYHLL°uA6[ Clro'cPvJ e51...f..) If w°..4n
I / 3 // C j___
/ I _ /
1 N O^40� �I5'S L O&p*4I RD�. E-'�Ayo D2uiNWA-IIT Cr.•V)
�Sa...Wr I •rw..� I
I JA d COI_
_ (/--1�5'V::i:: 1 :
4 O 1 J I i ( 1 I --�—! n vIL s ° `---p--- it
IJ•.1.1� 1 !� l � � //���� t: 1�/� i
i' Q j. ..in.,01110,02n L'� I �(`� L0-1 RWJT0..1 west
•y'oi /01 "+1D ...re.y(n.) I. ry •.....0... nus-i 3
�-K: QI U7t t.. AJ[KILl9 -�I .15...M�,c1..1W.
/ ///J l`: I I .+- ,----- ..... fi�IJA(+,v) (e° n.c5s}^ ' rxrxll-la/ev)' �. N
N 11.. • sm's t flu
i .
i 'O' 3
' 1"- NEw O1JE S?02Y RwtAI{. 61JILDI I.If{-IZ 890 ss i ---_---_
N/uuwR 511114,5o iPRIa..Ifl TIRrINA(2rx..A ._
NW{ SRtJNK.LJ:RGr "to N J
( 1..
`Nw R[r...1Ry vatisit6J4 Aux,-(b') ()°W
r ` Rfl e:u5rw1 "I'KOSBLT GI-'fA wastl.l"1 P..RnIJq IeT
/ L.:N= 6UILDIrv161 ARIA. 12. 5,5 062(t&UMW r&IL&J R..NJy) ,
` ►ARKIFIq R66y111R6D 14 615.465(sJ./IDQ).6i w LWfrL.mNIR"JtY.1116r&.-)
• / /\ I't:�I.JMINARY pI.AN •
- vrRRINa 1'ROJIDED G'15r6 G6S
0 56 D L&JE: PLANNING DIVISION
-2r UWK DUILDfLIy
A P.RIH2f6A ..7 .•,...IrIM CITY OF SFNTON
1.2010� 7/2(/e'I ALO.Jm I�RADT VA`(•
7JN 6/I/81 F6Dua.D try.07 .5'V.(U7o sr) -
•- @L G/12/8'7 ®IIJ- IO2 L..Jr& -,514. .
EIJWOI UK SLAM Sa370BTt NE R.DULTN 1 =1120 RTCUIRW \.15
i \
y....{, 1 �n{�(yM� uE,WA BBOaJ IT17 IRpJIpGD l
N�d-a�-uc�(L'YII DFOP6'QO6Mi5V-O690 ©edes.A.L,uz,p.�.. , MAY 2 2- 1989 �y 1-I IF-�,�- -- DZAwIF��
27 of LIT""S4 • RE1?OF-4 RGTAIL
'521850 fIt...02 .657 K RKaI I RCD
i57 SF ROV106D n \V .2
. .
t
-p T-- •
7
1
- „,
6 ,.---.L.;44a,,,,.:72',L.'"LfA'
.1:•34).` I
. I
-e 1
I
II. I- i Ci'• d I
172.1 Vic'ZIPLFiLL'o°0 4
I . .
1
1:_-)
I
Li b I .-•-•r----o- -
I
...:._
—
I —
....
— .
_ ....
.r 1111:§11MI-
MeA.rar =-
-
I.
, t
= . 4 1
1= S I.. j i a
t=r I 1.
1=1 si r-
TRASH PREP.° . 12 =3...1 IS,14 IS II. .10
—1--- I i le
i= II zo
o 21 22 = 2., 24 ,=,25 P%-ociz.,...... .—
Ur
_
) , ,e ,I.DI 14
('
it 3 k•f 8 i. ro i -0' ---,..44..-r- cit.,R.4..,-.,, ,t, 0.1„,
,...,,, r., (1
...
,?..5 94'3' % •.
t .. ' '":• • -. '
* •'•
, .
.rgai..11-1114.gy.PkA&W 11461
1402114
CD-----71'.7-7kDiffligA74 - - -~7-:•÷1 OF_-,--- ..."[:.-tf.Z.1-460.0-.S
Yi5"ol L "
a3
7/214bI
. .
. .
Lepa/L
_____==---,. -.,— -- -__,_. -._._ '-.:•_ii_-,..,-J-_,i59/1 gni .
------- E-=--
T -_--,-32aiO'Eflg,LiTiL :--7 tli.zio ri
__-_-__v r4rfFN s-q,2$--x..iwit.41Firi ----_
_ .0.1.1-.-.1.__ -.... -- —, .--, — ---....... --. .--- --.•01--....- •,,,, ,OZS
.,a,lo,FICL k7noilmntaL . HS SS,P21.1.:
..J.,%-.1 331101 -)n.,- 4.
... t A I %.,) !..• •.P-
V'•1.Ci..LIMA' 1
=. . ,',"V".7.31.1% be t.rtiill411',ZIP1:•-1
i =..,.
. = ••
: pa.,___ I I,
..
- - -------- - --------v— .._ _:-_-_- Ln ,,, ..,.9—.. .,.i _-=7------===-=-=:--;
• I
i ,oz ,oz. 1:::!..::::::::: .):::•:1,'.. 'zL_ti 4
.i ...m. t !. __...„, 17_4 = 1.••=a
1
' 1
Ul_ ,.i0,17 _ )_ ,..,
Zst 0- •..... ,
::13...!..... ' ";-•:.::::.,Eft '.'s.::. w-
.. , .. .. . . . .. _ li
I
,07 _ :: 131 .... _il s •"
... ,07 : .... , ..... : •.,..• ' -.":-•
I .5L
.....11 CI • •.• 1E............---....HisP• _i i. •-•-. 1. L
••••-321•••• '....raS,,, adtrlSONST'l .1.,71.11.407(17) • :
..,••
--. .1..",fdl.407 CO • : .•: allit,
3.1,25.7374%
11 3..r.,sor,,, YSSI, 3.1.,•7501,Y1 "'4'1141
1 • •_,
. i-7,40407(t)
.::::
.••'! 4-----..1,,,,1)...L
i. ., ..• do.1.5-1S s IVA
• ;: A
1. - — ''c't t
- '''- 'ilk'.. ...i...•.t: 1 '''-'
• .
•
. .
• ==--:--441:-Vglaigi----767P_V444Szt_.:-__--_ _
__,g:fen.4-4,2-kt-stlital_..--.ags,-.1•1- --- -----
_- _-,_,_- ,,,-....-1,:. In-,=•,11121W411 -:
. 2 I
''...
,:,.. I
li
,,,,., 1 i r
I. 1 1 i/ // <17411t.. It . ...
. di 1 .Aki , 11 ° Mil : , ...,.- N'., 1
. ,....- ; ,
111111k- 11 1 ' i ilku ..
1
... /1E11 t .'. -1 -• . . 111111t - I .7 I 1 i 1
-...... - '
'',, 1 .. •--.. -•1:L_',• IM, ,11 1111 11111 . II-''-1.1.1.1.:L:rilifill Hi•.••••••••=.••• •.11 ._____ 11 11111 1 11111111111111,''•'• _7. •r::1 — -- -7 11IIIII 111111111 111111 I 1":..L.• . rE 111 111
, I I I . .....1111L11111111111111111111,
/// .::•-::--:-7727 ri 1 :/ till II si -__,. w ini si ,./ ,z,. ,i,0 mi / .::,.:,,L..:'4-..'- - Efg m MI 8
5 .7 I '
..
. 1 -r'•,:;-1 777115.111_4- ,L, E. 17 T.',. • t la prAglue imi_.___ • - - imimm r ,i'- • - ' I or• im timi IIM .1.., ..-- --I MM', - 1M ...1 _ MII • • ',/, --,1/, :, II:
,... _ .- z. --"mttl' I , • , , 11111.1• EIM w :: , , , , ••
. • • I I ..=-----rtw•gvni --- --- 1 -7-....1, -I , ,
-,...
.11P-Alkirea\44-2entAt;Y:1 , _,1• , z,,-• .-4-',-... --
• ,
•
AVC-I3VAA,C7..-i-7X:41
-
.- •- ileilke.V.,Z0 ----- =-, ,----,-=---..---------- --.' -
.-r. , VI 4,. 1,..••
,. • - 7
.-...t.,..i,„,,..... : _
.__.
•-fl .",''7.•./i,”:',.. :- :..', ....;
Q3
7/2.6./iy,
•
•
I:
....I 11
'
111- t II
,•,
. 11477 I Ft.coR
• =2,1
"Al••Y
•
iir*Isifir•• -
11 II 11 1
'Mr 4F 5%.12...Mr
11 II II
II
n.00rzl. -4,1 ,••••• • -• —
1 \17 —"1111711
,•• •••••••
STUCCO
FA.44s,
- - - -
,cp)
712,44,
C ROOF,IBE.Y0•10
TOP Or PAR,PET '''•...,..,.,
• . ____ _____I . : . ,.c..2.sTucco r--4-1.gra,Ti-rP. c-,
_ 7 _ :__
E 1 ,
7 gl u3 Tv...Pr%-C E E El M .1- ELI Tii ,
171-Y 7 ..i__ L L_ LJ L -/-1 ILI L.,
7,---7 IT =1 ii - - • — — — ,
. . 1 ,PLOoRLINJG
_Z Z 1 .7. _ .
- r -• J r1 •
PA,K11,16I 4.A...51,
. . .
- r..v.11Vii."tiii2 WIAPIP.:91
otzpw
'Vfl,t :n S. .. i.„ Vbd-;it-a" - -- - __ _ imi.-11A-1 orrt 6
0
. 11.151016 HT
fea,7/Zdel
fl.-/N-11"lvIA•T-r-SIA\L- 17AN-F-TiE.
be-mr- •11, ,717,‘,--,NC, I.z.l*w4-4.1,12
. .lar.nit4--re,It-Fr
1 ,•-•"1
agtL-),1
tofu-W."91"W-L.A.4,,,,r 1./..0.- '%..1,,e....
V'141",4-'14-r
MO GINg. ' 11, ?Y.-1.11,54-1 mwraut.ta
on,1.../Alle-DO L.....2f-1- 10.',10 rr.-7-pl...,1-L t•Ig47/VI1ivz• (V I L V ) VW.ev-, .06.-L, reg-fim4 Mr:Will-W.Toxivrze.
ptpcvvr•wiwr+ teMIN. peg.ri...+3 Mi-..-V C.i.MzeiV.
1,4,,,-.1,y141-0. IV• tr-0-PI,N4 Me9'0.-r-gf-t-1 '
6.412.4,tElTre,1.1.7-1HRE. 0'6.'1., .
- • •
•C'W-F-K Ilzge,.,
ri-~141-1C,64-ffaMr 4,-AFF.1..E. 1-"1.-4,-• Fr-fz-Plw41 Accastr'TV-r--
,,,E.-vize.ezt-ti.J Ace-e-r-tr- •
,,,,,...a.,,ri ppAzont•ir•-r. -
,,,H,..4,-e••ri-e- .9-••* . r04.-1,1,44 . ..izer-i-1. . /
I. .,;(' Ai.411..15..fir,-,4Z-14F-KWr....{‹. 0,0 • rer2-ra....4
-
("•e.) to.-..•..-R..**4 . .
1.19•=j
• I, w-4-6r rn...d--1-r mArrie4",-.I-,EN-actv.olz.ei-LAI-
. f1.4-i-ir••,-,.r.c..evrio-1-Har^-1..- khrf.-P Ta.ki,r... Hi.se-47 it..v..,a47. ,
. /,,,k4.,1..."417.. 6.1,-4..., •••,r0.4.4.-oa rereie,on-ao 1,...y?...".•,....-,r-r-r,, pip....uzlegg.•..11.-.71.04.,,,,,,,,,v .
.,...,r-el,v-n,-,41. 1417 irae.v...,•••nu-4....frrp...t.e. ca,,,,Ht.xe..A.K.-re,,..,R•r•
•
p..„,nzegev..4,1nevr,7 Ls.w•ratr,.. r-e-m•'91Y-F-4-1. \e,/
-igeo-1..ma caz,a4e.va.4,-
,Airmvni.k. cum,[Or= ...rip:
-- ! VA A dm, Air riprif it. ,Airo..\ A or*,.41,,...."0,..
, ., , .......-• •...-. ,_:,,,.._....,...p.T....,,,,,, .--_,ml ....01...0-..... o „. a.., ,.
4.
—± ' V- Akt.:..5,a-i ...idel:Vtri",.;•lite' reliV..."111 ANOIP.:-. AlkF te • . .:--;AA 4W/21;?.,:..A. i _ ..1__ _..,.:
I -j1 lir- .. . , '4---4 -,..-aveur.liDiamm-7. 17,1?-trilt7 3.'3' ...7.•_,,...- --- - l * -'eft..VIIii atfilillk Oft.i . i _1
ir,,,......„,ve, h.--,alit..,%0J4,-.-4.444411-14:10 '
I/
////
I ; : . ! I 54f.'"'
- 4-.4Y4,144LIO 4.1tilk .
i , wrrtit. . j ,..,,:y
7 ...... -_A__.‘ i PRetrrir..4.,.. ret, i
Z-i? bi N.ID clil,C.4,L.Y I 1 I
i I 1 1 1
1,14i.aw 1.444,X.off--mill- . II-- l',1
*ak ' i=r1-1d, . ' • '',,,
4[:
fr,CW*114.1161-1 Or ?-:. : i . T Tiz•a: :
-- 10-
La Ril '
-IP ,
ove4wv-r-e.,,Asgue.,,-tvW...mo fir...vs '''.41114imii... g 2.1..11. . ...Y .
, kri
xi
,r • .7ii I 9 . . , ,
_41 - 44r• •,(isLiiiT,,,f,"FF..4
li 0-L,Te
, 1,4
— 7
1
i
, .:•.::.ra
• ,
1,
11
rmw.ei-laiL4-1--e&-r.-orrrcopt..kvi:
wi 1.11.1C“ 15L110114,rikRKII-lei
•
I
,
.
(If
t
., • . • >
. <
• —
, <
\.) v
Nil ul -ii
,.... .
/I/r .40,4 V...‘610.1 •
, p.xisri,..144 ,..•-L.vr(la s',.).... - .
'
..,,,,'-. .,'.•:,3:i."--41.D.:1.4-41.:::, I •
• -
.,.....,,.,„:t.../ ..2.,,....., .
. .,
•
:::•:I......',....-:.",....•._- .
if.'
......
.....
noel -
L.1
II .
• . . . . .....
. _ • .
' . • . 0 .
. 0 . .
• .
. •
. mnsoree9 EV
• R.i.V.ii2abl' .
.. •
- .
• • t•••
•
. .
•
•.
. •
. •
. . . .
• . ./
. .
' •
. . . .
. • •
. .
• . .
. • /
.
-•
. i
G.W. A KA4:7"( \A/A.:1' t .. • .
w ' W w EX., le•INPSOR w OPPP.I • I
:
. 0 bbob.Reba Dlu•sili.1,4 AVM,[WTI% (10d 1,42N4 1 •
w
bcf i . CADVW...1.%--1. ....re
•'".
. .
4, ----1?---- 4. f .
\ .e...• r.u._______./•
. . .
..----C'5) gw) i.‘• 3 •:,i r(5-0..„. __________•...,,,..:7.--,--.-------. _________ _____7_____,_,;_M_____________._____:
---------;1111 /d• •
/
\ • ____.- -.-- --- C.--5'W 1..,..1.1-ii2e,triwal /be/.IUc r4) ---
.....
/A<.011 \ "''''i/en . • j --.....-/-
. • race f--""/.4.10 141,../0WA.
---.--____,.... _ _______,..----__ • (41')
{
•...„.......-•--------"-.•\
• -0 —/
.i. " • " '
o
i.
i
. .. •
/
'''\--! .1;.• '. lb '''''' "YM ' /1 T. .,,,. . "---— /— •:;, 1
. / .
..(e •
•
VC
i,... / 1.0°N.) / CIAO/PLO......0-1) • rx.r....r.1-10(v. •
'="4; \ .
... y, • .•.. . ..xviii..tisrFt..
, 1.-4.--- :.•••:., ,,c.:: .--
"." Jr ............. .....- ,- /
? i• .1 •i ..eit. -1.' od. • ......4. •
ROIrIPOP•PP M.
IF/ / <>
o Ai 1!"--,‘,•,, • , 41" v..: 615047,------._ e.°N.
• 1 .7
A, e,,,,,,. ......
. v
-A" Milt,,,— ....---_7,ttg„, -/ ,V"----.\ t-Mw .91.18.,sizersim.pczromi&%ditxJa.pti.14 . le re
P.--..e. n• ".„., • 7-
,%,..4,,f,‘• y.- c 7 wr •-•.....e.trao, .
------ _ .
. 4, .T:. P -,_ Pm. FL. Pl.PP.POM We FE. CA'' . ‘11 •
.._4 PVC b.FEWER.PAE.•2% --•14...PVC P;OrOPPPFROOPPL P% 114.P.'•CM IT'''' ,,,,,.
n no • --.1401.17:-C-207.--722 . — "I6M4A-A"rr(I"— .— ,. —__F-=_12. 5bb .-1.-satme,,,,,,,-__ry_'• _._ .
. .., • —"-ri..•.4 . . .
.5.,:,.: .., fr......,e.-.. •• •, .:?..'._ . .
c.”,....,........r. . i r.IPPPS CP •
' 't-'•°I...0.11.11
rrM,IrNIARY 121-1 UIL1I
rtN I = -----P..A.s....C.0•11.(n.(aFr) .
• .me 5.wor 64..wdwrous CIPPL SOFt
• CD 11/.2.01 .., • •, cam...Ror-x.F-Fef
__
• P2) ..,......./mo.o...1,-(.)
.. • . .PIPCIPIO80X1 MOW,00.P.0.1 bb:So/2-0,
• --PO—EXIST:
EXIST:SEW..!WY
—PO—EXIST: WRIPPR......
----.--BLDG,ROOF ORNI,./Trrs.A.P.X- ....• ZIS
• . ----PROPERTY u....s..•
e JAEGER'ENGINEERING •
1111.
a . -
. • _. .
iii55 SE 2i4St Aubirn,Wa. 98002•*....Uoe)insileesa . CA, P., •1...•
- . . .
- .
.Roc$10•••-••4
fiff.171•MT /e-
•
rtoor •
Arrf)
•
.• ":•- •_.-37:7; „sjee.!, 5t. .
' •
GE-C t---1 C-
rreLimikiAKy
-
5/IV al
eay.9i2-6/8 •
-':"'6170-•
4
.•
krepv/t. A
kg/ 1/
ZZI .
„c7,-,1 oef,1 7
7Ve-•'`Z/, I-4
171.440 NO.I-NN _
,I--1 I ANV21L1 A.ZI'Vri I Hil2lei
,.
tl;!- ':. ".'7-.:41.ii .W:f'
.
_...2-------------.• '' . . •- •
11 1.-.3ros, . q7Ohla..1-NVIrtgOv's2 "...--J--0,0-.4-- - .. _______— —•
IC .
._,. .
'o• -vo_roti,,1.110,6715- ! ......rorn---14.=.21 _ r.,
y_
(---4 t.
11 I
%:t 4.• W.K.L044.
•
'.FrIlYaWkil.:*-4:11°14
t t.17,0
j .1.4nri
' .
•: 1 __-.: 1, - 1---.1 cp i_1_ "a 5 ._
v.rt
______._1-• __— .__.____._____••_.:. -•,—.....
• ' ---I-—--. ''''- ''''' :?* -
--77,
lo1-.--- .r,. - ..••- •-•.•,-
___ — ,
-,-•
.......s
.1-zoori T -' _______________.:..........• .--....-----.r—t_
J..era...4-asysa ..:=.7024, .-L5r
i,....VA•1 ACI`o^d 9 7.v5
...,
; 2F, histrat.i
•
ro•or.•-.
'J.-RW.1.. • 1•,1.:Ay-s-ArOv-/ i-
1
•
cPerzl Iva.]
,LIHn 71'1 -
4 .
•
• -
fig4:7jrzy. . 45::4:5:1:.i...i.71...fi.:1°,4:":„.114.:11,:a4::rwm,..ari:91!(2)0C31,.,..-, .„
be/•77//.. nra
- • Le 1"0/S
I. ..
.:..z:----=- V 9,-1---.-',.-.1.-ic2J:17tet=--•
. .
19i-11~21d ,1-21-dri II,.111- 1.4 o6go-rsarapet 9ntos4arlipitl
twee ym alA31-139
aINItIbml OZI I.. at41.4101.CbSi a allrIlEi nAVVP-Iert"FP1
1,,,alainoca,,, 14 Mt/L /all •
Lgrat> WrIl .
(is>in)",Ss %OS .1.41 [MS/1.MA LA/I/9 ?••13
. losizt4
•--..-. -mlitssif 11 .._.._
. ..___ F7alkiap=vv.-,: -_Z.-- - NVIel 5.11 A2INVNI14115A41 Pi
• . . ..... .
...
L...... KL.2101-- - --..........
:F7 .1-,-/A,F4-4__ .-=-- 151LW3•04:512Maitr--_-M ...........
- - - =-3w-.-as.z..2.zeneeensimusens -•
•71'..1-"vel J21lc7-Ad . Hossn rx•-, --........
19-1 IsISIssrml Isrsq.sism -----"'--..J
(o.pii)..LArrry kir 1.1.947,1
_ P•I.
Hilids. mirk/ -1
__
Ft . 03.111
etroleg-W
OrearlId MI1411119 IIIMITI//A 1
I I _
-Z -
24 II, 1. ' tsr-,m5,,,ridsizgrarairri
-- 2aLsidgrirt-4 . -- 1-10 /MN ‘ I;
A (.‘
> • . .
.> •
.
•F,,Ii•-•-•:;;,•-i.,,r-•..
; ..y
/ • . .. '''.i••, .:7.1i:•1. .•:',....:
;..,..•
DI /
,-
. . -
_4.11 /2114
•mrsels ../Or11/4.11A ' I $.::-ri-- . -- a riomrigns-t."Zan
0...Az) twilia ON ;ST 1
g. f-Se>sue bisiSSIVAI-
.45Q?r-V.i.nimi La9 I 4. 1 "
liT2gaIl7 Mlit ? ?
1 IIi
i•-•Iil
I 1 • f 77). ; 411.icq's;v• "
, ,4,-.7.* • , , .
• , o
....
(:)! I 1 1 ;0 1 : -I I 1 I I .
•
.........4,,;.3 ...
,— i...(N._ ,__,___.,,,,,,.) ,,orTM1 m s- CO
..;,IVC Iwo 1..3.3111.10.4.1.1441,r.ra.e
":41:tri-H14741 411171•I 5161'----, 'II.° tr
Q....p..0
't sy/Mai>
411‘ l
..01 • (7Noli pol) 2111./.n0 I efM1/ orfiymig
-1-4-.p.e119 -pvs
/ • If .
--:--
/
'-':-f; •
- .. .. .
. ,
/ . .
,yr•Nmirra•sfy'do Yr•myyt - - , •
.
/ _
.17Pryleirggg .
.
m i•+ ypos
. .•
' .
- •
NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the
Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application
and the necessary Public Approvals.
DESCRIPTION: RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
PENTA GROUP
ECF; SA-055-89
Construction of a new one story, 13,607 sq.ft office building, including 25 under-
building parking spaces and 38 above-ground parking spaces.
GENERAL LOCATION:
Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
PUBLIC APPROVALS:
o Environmental Review
o Site Plan Approval
o Building Permit
The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of
Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during
Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further
information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the
Planning Division at 235-2550.
y -
CITY OF RENTON
qP
soLL Hearing Examiner
Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman
July 16, 1990
Mr. Tom McFarlan
Penta Group
8118 South 122nd
Seattle, WA 98178
Re: Site Approval #055-89
Dear Mr. McFarlan:
On June 20, 1990 we wrote requesting that, you advise this office by
July 5, 1990 as to the status of the above application.
To date no correspondence has been received from you, and the
application is now considered to be dismissed.
Sincerely,
FRED J. KAUFMAN
HEARING EXAMINER
FJK/dk
cc: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator
Ron Nelson, Building Director
Lawrence Warren, - City Attorney
_ n„- QQ1t -
CITY OF RENTON
moll. 141
_ i Hearing Examiner
Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman
June 20, 1990
Mr. Tom McFarlan
Penta Group
8118 South 122nd
Seattle, WA 98178
Re: SA-055-89
Penta Group
Dear Mr. McFarlan:
On November 14, 1989 the request by Penta for Site Plan approval was
reviewed by this office and a decision rendered that stated "The
applicant will have to submit modified plans to this office that
satisfy the conditions imposed by the ERC and recommended by staff and
this office prior to final approval of the proposed Site Plan. The
applicant shall submit to staff as many copies of the modified plans
as are required for initial review and approval. "
As of this date no further word has been received by this office. Due
to the time lapse, with no additional information, it is imperative
that you advise this office, in writing, by 5: 00 P.M✓July 5, 1990 the
status of this application or the matter will be dismissed.
Sincerely,
FRED J. AUFMAN
HEARING EXAMINER
FJK/dk
cc: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator
sty Clerk
.,..n itt:fi A.. .,,e a .,,rh - Aantnn Wachinatnn QRn55 - (2n61 935-2593
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)ss.
County, of King )
DOTTY KLINGMAN
, being first duly sworn,
upon oath, deposes and states:
That on the 14th day of November _ __
, 19g9 affiant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a
decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of
record in the below entitled application or petition.
4c-Ilert‘47 :1 )
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this Atir-4,--- day
of NOmdj-ey ', 1989
,a,thr -
No:ary blic in an for the State of Washington,
residin N n)Lgtvt , therein.
Application, Petition, or Case #: SA-055-89 - PENTA GROUP
(The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.)
November 14, 1989
OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND DECISION
APPLICANT: PENTA GROUP
File No: SA-055-89
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue
S.W.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Site Plan approval for the construction of a new one-story
13,607 sq. ft. office building with subterranean and ground
level parking. Said construction will occur on a .77 acre
parcel.
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval, with
conditions
PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the
Examiner on October 24, 1989
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining
available information on file with the application, and
field checking the property and surrounding area, the
Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as
follows:
MINUTES
The hearing was opened on October 31, 1989 at 9:00 A.M: in the Council Chambers of the Renton
Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
The following exhibits were entered into the record:
Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting
and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request.
Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map
Exhibit #3 - Site Plan
Exhibit #4 - Landscape Plan
Exhibit #5 - Grading Plan
Exhibit #6 - Elevation Map
The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner from the
Planning Division of the Community Development Department. In her summary of the proposal Ms.
Blauman noted the site is zoned Manufacturing/Office Park and is considered small for that zoning
designation; the lot is currently vacant; the applicant wishes to develop a one-story office complex
which will include 25 parking spaces under the building and 38 above ground level. The underground
parking will access from the alley to the south of the site and the ground level parking will access from
either Grady Way or Raymond Avenue. This request complies with both the Landscape and Parking
and Loading ordinances.
The Environmental Review Committee reviewed this proposal and issued a Declaration of Non-
Significance, mitigated. To summarize the mitigated conditions the applicant is to provide adjacent
off-site improvements; a latecomer's fee for construction of the traffic signal at S.W. Grady Way and
Powell Avenue S.W.; develop a traffic mitigation plan or make a contribution to the pending Grady
Way. TBZ; provide a downstream analysis and storm drainage management plan. The applicant is also
requested to provide insulation to limit interior noise levels; provide a plan for on-site recreational
amenities for employees; provide a construction plan, erosion control plan, plan for hours of operations
and off-site hauling hours as well as site watering, wheel-washing of trucks, and provide a street-
cleaning bond. It was noted that the Grady Way Traffic Benefit Zone is still under consideration by
the City Council.
Penta Group
SA-055-89
November 14, 1989
Page 2
Reviewing the criteria for Site Plan requests Ms. Blauman stated the proposal is considered in
compliance with the Zoning Map and Comprehensive Plan goals and policies for design and industrial
development; the site is convenient to major transportation corridors and will provide services to the
manufacturing-industrial zone; impacts to the site and surrounding properties and uses are considered
to be minimal with regard to light and air, public services, noise and glare. The exterior treatment to
the building will be compatible with adjacent properties, landscaping is provided around the building;
pedestrian linkages are not consistent and will have to be modified. She said it is believed this project
will be an asset to the community and will enhance area-wide property values. Referring to the
parking off the alley it was pointed out there is a building adjacent to this site which also has parking
access off the alley. Staff has placed mitigation measures on the project to ensure that people backing
out into the alley will not back into persons pulling into the alley (signs and lighting will be upgraded);
noise levels and debris are expected to be at normal levels during construction and will subside after
said construction is completed; noise from nearby traffic will be minimal; interior insulation is to be
provided for noise mitigation for indoor workers; dBA requirements are 50 for this project; public
services and utilities are readily available to the site. Because the nearest recreational facilities are over
one mile from the site staff is suggesting some on-site recreational amenities be provided; and staff is
recommending the Hearing Examiner approve this request with the conditions that the applicant comply
with the ERC conditions; provide a sign plan; provide an exterior lighting plan; a plan for vehicle
access protection to and from the subterranean garage on the south of the property which will include
signs, lighting and side-view mirrors. The applicant is also requested to provide a pedestrian linkage
plan which may include revising part of the landscape plan; provide a plan for an on-site recreational
area; and provide a plan for protection from vandals and flying gravel from the roadway for the
windows on the south side of the structure abutting the alley. Ms. Blauman noted if the applicant did
not provide protection for the windows then the building would be set back 10 ft. from the alley's
center line, if protection is provided then the building can be located on the property line as now
shown on the plans.
Responding for the applicant was Tom McFarlan, Penta Group, 8118 So. 122nd, Seattle, 98178. Mr.
McFarlan requested and received clarification on staff recommendations and ERC conditions as set out
in the report. He questioned the procedure used to calculate the voluntary contribution to the pending
Grady Way Traffic Benefit Zone in the suggested amount of $48,955.81. He said the dollar amount
would add about 10% to the cost of this project for the developer which is considered substantial - and
he wanted to be sure that the rates used will be shared equally by the other businesses on Grady Way,
depending upon the type of use and the zoning of the property. Mr. McFarlan also reviewed the
conditions pertaining to the storm drainage management plan, size and portion of the site to be used
for the on-site recreation area requested by staff, whether the TBZ report was available to the public
for review and the dBA requirements for the site. It was suggested by the Hearing Examiner that Mr.
McFarlan address his questions to the Traffic Engineering Division, and, questions concerning
landscaping and pedestrian linkage should be directed to Jerry Lind, Landscape Planner.
Also responding for the applicant was Edward McHugh, Architect, 545 - 108th N.E., Suite #2,
Bellevue 98004. Mr. McHugh's concerns surrounded the issue of the TBZ and traffic mitigation plan
for improvements - questioning if the applicants did put in the improvements would they still be
required to pay the $48,955.81 fee. Ms. Blauman tried to clarify by stating the appeal period for the
ERC condition is past and the TBZ for Grady Way is not in place yet so the city can not require the
applicant to contribute to the Grady Way Benefit District - but the city can ask that the applicant
voluntarily contribute that amount or provide the improvements. Requirements for this specific project
could be obtained from the Traffic Engineering Department. She said the cost of an individual putting
in the improvements on their own is usually much more costly than the cost of being a part of the
TBZ, however, should the applicant decide to put in the improvements themselves then there would be
no contribution required to the TBZ. McHugh mentioned the contribution amount requested
represents almost a 8 - 10% added cost to the project whereas the amount usually applicable is 1-1/2 to
2% addition to building costs. He feels it is very difficult for property owners to find out these figures
now - and asked how such a high rate could be assessed when this property is up against a new road
that has recently been widened and improved. Ms. Blauman replied briefly stating it is impossible in
advance of doing a review of a specific development to be able to be precise in the costs that may be
involved. She acknowledged Grady Way has undergone improvements but studies of Grady Way itself
and other streets in the area reflect some poor levels of service owing to the fact this is one of the
fastest growing areas in the city. She did relate that recently on the N.E. 3rd and 4th Street corridors
traffic studies have lead the city to assess $288. per trip and compared that to the fee for this developer
noting it was the city's desire to be sure the city's infrastructure, including the roadways, works to
everyone's benefit. The Hearing Examiner also tried to ease the concerns expressed advising Mr.
McHugh that the City Council will be meeting on the TBZ and concerns such as these should be
brought before that body at the time of their meeting.
Penta Group
SA-055-89
November 14, 1989
Page 3
Continuing, Mr. McHugh questioned the fee schedule prepared by the Traffic Engineering Department
using a trip generation of 322 based on the project they are proposing and the same multiple of 322
trips was also used to determine their TBZ share when their property was undeveloped - he asked how
this was determined. Ms. Blauman clarified for Mr. McHugh. In closing Mr. McHugh asked if Penta
Group, as an option, developed the TBZ improvements, since it would benefit other developers, would
Penta be entitled to a reimbursement from those developers. Senior Blauman said Penta would only be
expected to put in their fair share of the improvements, and noted the total dollar amount for all of the
improvements could be in the millions of dollars.
The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to
speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:15 A.M.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION:
Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The applicant, Penta Group, filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for a one-story office
building.
2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a
Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal.
4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter.
5. The subject site is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of S.W. Grady Way and
Raymond Avenue S.W. The site is approximately one block north of I-405 and two blocks west
of Lind Avenue S.W.
6. The subject site was annexed to the city with the adoption of Ordinance 1745 enacted in April,
1959, as amended by Ordinances 1764 and 1928, enacted in May, 1959 and February, 1961,
respectively.
7. The site was classified B-1 (Business/Commercial) in May, 1984 with the adoption of Ordinance
3811. The site received its current M-P (Manufacturing Park) zoning with the adoption of
Ordinance 4036, enacted in December, 1986.
8. The site is served by city utilities including twelve inch water mains located along Grady and
Raymond, and a twelve inch sewer line located along Raymond. Storm drainage is also
provided by the city. The ERC required a downstream storm water analysis prior to issuance of
site preparation or building permits.
9. While the approximately .77 acre parcel appears to be shaped liked a parallelogram, it has
unequal sides. The parcel has approximately 341 feet of frontage along Grady Way, while the
corresponding rear property line is approximately 323 feet long. The parcel also has
approximately 100 feet of frontage along Raymond. A 16 foot alley is located along the site's
south property line.
10. The site slopes downward from Grady toward the alley. The elevation at Grady is
approximately 20 feet while the elevation near the alley is approximately 16 feet. The applicant
proposes utilizing this grade difference to arrange parking under the rear of the proposed
building.
11. The applicant proposes developing a one-story office building over the parking area. The
building would be approximately 13,607 square feet. The complex will contain 63 parking
stalls. Parking would be both at street level along Grady Way and under the rear of the
building. The surface parking would accommodate 38 vehicles. The lower level parking would
serve 25 vehicles, and access would be directly from the alley. A central staircase would
provide pedestrian access down to the parking level.
Penta Group
SA-055-89
November 14, 1989
Page 4
12. The building will be finished with a combination of stucco and wood siding in shades of beige,
brown and ivory. A green metal roof, green trim and flashing, and green accent tile will be
used. Portions of the roof structure will be peaked. In addition, a parapet will screen rooftop
equipment. The north or front facade will be articulated and columned, gabled entryways will
provide access to the offices and lower level parking. The colors could be subject to change
since the record shows a change from blue accent colors to the green now proposed.
13. With only a few exceptions, there will be landscaping installed immediately in front of the
proposed building. This landscaping along the approximately 300 foot facade will vary from 5
feet to 10 feet in depth. Landscaping is also proposed along the Grady Way and Raymond
perimeters between the surface parking area and the sidewalks. The east corner of the site will
receive additional landscaped treatment and a seating area, although seating along the heavily
traveled Grady Way may not prove popular.
14. One driveway is proposed along Grady Way. A second driveway would provide access along
Raymond. Access to the lower level parking would be directly from the alley with drivers
maneuvering directly into the parking stalls from the alley (Section 4-2204(1)). Staff reviewed
this arrangement and concluded this alley access would be safe. That determination was based
on the limited use of the alley by other parcels with access rights to the alley and by requiring
installation of signs, additional lighting and mirrors.
15. The area contains a mix of uses including an adjacent office building to the east and other
commercial uses to the north, east and south. There are also some vacant parcels interspersed
between the site and I-405.
16. The applicant proposes locating the building along the rear property line with no setback.
Provisions of both the Building and Fire Codes permit the zero setback proposed but require
openings along the zero setback wall to be protected. In this case that would mean protective
entries to the lower level garage stalls and any rear windows. To avoid these performance
standards the applicant would have to shift the building two (2) feet to the north and this
modification could affect the proposed site plan for this rather narrow lot.
17. Staff has calculated that the uses on the site will generate approximately 322 vehicle trips per
day. The ERC imposed conditions to mitigate traffic for the development and those conditions
were not appealed.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The Site Plan Ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a Site Plan. Those
criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration:
a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan;
b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes;
c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses;
d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself;
e. Conservation of property values;
f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation;
g. Provision of adequate light and air;
h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use;
The proposed use appears to satisfy many of these and other particulars of the
ordinance, but a number of design features need modification.
2. In addition, proposed site plans must not adversely affect area-wide property values, must
provide adequate air and light, and must not cause neighborhood deterioration or blight. The
proposal appears to successfully satisfy these additional criteria.
3. The proposed use, a commercial office building, is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. It
will provide additional office space and employment opportunities in this area. It also develops
a long vacant site that has adequate public services. The development accomplishes the purpose
of the Comprehensive Plan that suggests development occur in the core of the city prior to
jumping to a more remote site or sites without adequate public services.
•
•
Penta Group
SA-055-89
November 14, 1989
Page 5
4. Site Plan review does not permit more than a cursory examination of the proposal's adherence to
the Building Code. The rear wall and its windows and garage openings do not appear to meet
code standards, and modifications to meet requirements will be required. The building, in other
respects, complies with the Zoning Code. The one-story height easily meets the M-P
limitations, as does the landscaping, parking and lot coverage.
5. The north or front view provides an interesting variegated facade. The facade is articulated,
and the entryways are further set off from the facade by columns and gabled roofs. In
addition, color and mixed exterior materials provide interesting detail. The perimeter
landscaping, as well as the landscaping in front of the building, will soften the appearance of
the structure. The low-rise nature of the structure will limit any shading or shadow impacts on
adjacent uses or structures. The building and its proposed uses will have minimal impact on the
surrounding uses or streetscape.
6. Staff has suggested that the applicant provide on-site recreation, and the absence of pedestrian
walkways separated from the traffic aisles should be rectified. Seating along Grady Way does
not seem very appealing as a lunch spot. The rather restricted site, particularly the narrow
depth of the lot, limits options for providing recreation and walkways on this site. The narrow
dimension of the lot coupled with the possibility that the building will have to be shifted two
feet from the rear property line could create problems in a number of respects. The shift in
building location and the provision of walkways could affect either the parking complement or
the landscaped areas. This was not fully explored at the hearing. Since these options might
substantially alter the building, further review seems necessary.
7. To provide at least a seating area away from heavy traffic, the applicant could possibly reduce
the length of the building. This would provide seating along Raymond, a street with
substantially less traffic than Grady. Since landscaping was proposed for this area, quite
possibly seating could be accommodated by a slight reduction in building length.
8. Development of the site should not have any adverse impact on property values. If anything
the development of what generally appears to be a reasonably designed building should increase
property values and possibly encourage other development or redevelopment efforts in this area.
9. Staff, especially Traffic Engineering, has reviewed the vehicle circulation patterns on the site.
The surface parking lot, with the exception of the absence of pedestrian walks, provides
satisfactory and safe access. The parking under the building presents safety issues both for
vehicles and pedestrians. The maneuvering directly from the alley could present conflicts
between cars backing out of parking stalls and those traveling through the alley. Also, drivers
entering or exiting cars will be below grade at the rear of the building. This could provide an
opportunity for criminal activity. As staff suggested, the appropriate placement of mirrors and
adequate lighting will be required to offset these disadvantages.
10. Again, the size and scale of the building, as well as the numerous windows should provide
adequate light and air for occupants of the building.
11. In conclusion, while the building is designed to make the best use of a rather constricted site,
there are still too many unresolved aspects of this proposal. These issues include the potential
relocation of the building, the addition of pedestrian walkways, and the provision of some
recreational elements. These modifications could dramatically alter the current Site Plan and it
would be inappropriate to approve the project at this stage. Therefore, the applicant will have
to submit modified plans to this office meeting the objectives outlined by staff, the ERC and
this office before final approval can be given the project. Copies of these plans should
simultaneously be provided to the Planning Division for their review.
DECISION
The applicant will have to submit modified plans to this office that satisfy the conditions
imposed by the ERC and recommended by staff and this office prior to final approval of the
proposed Site Plan. The applicant shall submit to staff as many copies of the modified plans as
are required for initial review and approval.
. Penta Group
SA-055-89
November 14, 1989
Page 6
ORDERED THIS 14th day of November, 1989.
#4-144_
FRED J. K 1 1-MAN
HEARING E AMINER
TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of November, 1989 to the parties of record:
Tom McFarlan
Penta Group
8118 So. 122nd
Seattle, WA 98178
Edward McHugh
545 - 108th N.E., Suite #2
Bellevue, WA 98004
Larry Brown
Star Properties, Inc.
1900 South Puget Drive #202
Renton, WA 98055
TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of November, 1989 to the following:
Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Public Works Director
Members, Renton Planning Commission Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director
Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Ronald Nelson, Building Director
Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer John Adamson, Developmental Program Coordinator
Garth Cray, Senior Engineering Specialist Valley Daily News
Brent McFall, Mayor's Acting Administrative Assistant
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in
writing on or before 5:00 P.M. November 28, 1989. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of
the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment,
or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may
make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the
Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such
appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal
be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified
requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance
Department, first floor of City Hall.
The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications
may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may
not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the
land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council.
All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication
7 permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to
openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the
request by the Court.
The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as
well as Appeals to the City Council.
t ,
� _
` • .
; 1 1 11 a
__ j _ M s (%N b-
I 1
A b _
, I
I
'.1 I
p
•
-
,
it i
ox . ,t-r_Jj .
J
�. �, I ,
r ! _ I
i 1L
I
i. ,, ,..". qt..
7.1
1Pi '' i a. :
kuL 11
Asa ,1 • �, x
i MI iHM.i gM ) -At. ii- /
t. 4 n' » '" fl ii A
`° 111/I g1 l 1. r -� • 4bY, , ---. , P i Si
I~t 4;,-4_,..... 1.1 ,t, ,c• ;1 i-“ ig 4!
V- il li h. i‘ _"Ill . 2
t
III 0t1
3 ' 7 - . ,
lqi il i 1°A 1
l'A 1 an - dm Ii•I‘ - '' t. 1 si iiiiia ____
i.: ii \-- - i. i . .- a, k -- •
c, .) a , . _ • .- .g.:.----).-6,,_0,1beivilit:j
t' lh lit iii N 1 fk L.,P 11 Ili ii . .
---------___ _ ,
- •
A.
• ,
rv
• l
La/'z/L 'a
La):1/5
G
axvve, IS Lla
-9- Oca Ir i .or,L510 a ix,- : ,oca'si.
41•v'.•1.1trrl 1'1sVnssaq O7 V V
i7r-IM`d?JQ .L?�d�-il1-.11^'�'^2Sj oealro2A LI.ZI 'ooee`TVA ar^ �LiL111.11 v vP-
esai Nara 020. • ro11TY d - 3n NLBOL GbS z 31r5
!Los aw crsaInv-rn `B/.IL/L N..
•r..e.e or+l aonaanl© 1,4,Z/3 'ASTS
(n OM).r,s• •L Oa L+ G ny L
.7n .',if ,11
_ •� a.y��0 N'd�l 11.15 J,�NIW113e1 \/
(.xrr��u�o��.-,raarst r. `` µtyor
DICT.r-3.f..7TYu 7=.—ies•31
?T'.aSm Ma's)"M+.rcn4sl-Sv3°'e..2en[3saw� ...horror /
YlYd J.?�=0� rsm ;n.�
ir. a nam-. 4••!Js•r/ ` \\f .
,.»0 . (^,"7I)).T.-TT vru�la L.af7oa 1.4.77./Im ) / .
' § . • 7 fx 4%gi 1rr+urrwlevna rnrn/r I ,a 127 V'4 ram- fa OiS 9r0 M9N .
• N s-n. ..wrsaian II
$ 1�- Urlxa.., tu..t.�.n -- i0 1I !n-(
FI . y.7..o . ,rams (.aT1 a.wae a v ! i q3
,J,
. 15./'• re.i.rIW LW. YO AN r+n 1 ..O .
gI �` �rl ..�
c - -�r �. ,x I L .r1Na«.�
L.--4..i
. ' C.) ; 1- / /
/
/r. - •
- -- -- '-(N.11J nCP•c ec) b P,u•/9 s0ITI, n G; (� -- ¢ -
• ,I., 'THM/1iYAI Y"/74'W
• •..- (n..a)ni v.,acne-. .ra•.os.•nxL..r.^sib .-.p o
v
---5 I IC)1
/! IA,
r
1.•.c,,b (1..0).7 ( rN) - 71 rti.ri ar+ I
/ v /'•OT I suMo'�rtH nrusM
)_dM Jam`" I9 "M'S
/ ,
/' i
/
.7 .e,I a i,o x<. .ns r 1'414 snl
r nr, ol v�Ns 1 K
•
•
•
•
LeMz(t
19rtlMvec �T.erilNl-6aa—. •
•
,u,,,r
-amp I lTn1T]tnT •lla �+a Y��� ,1101»� !� e1- 1�+
•
liar'x]4e .
bt •»1 1-'Vt.
•
•
-• , •
I II
•
N f r i o = Lci
- ,
i1�2). =Pr
•
1i '..—�I1f+t;. }`. . 1—�— ice..
Y-J •� Ha♦ L•.•+san�"'�-� 10 YJ HO].(b) • 17`•Ii W07(b) • el'•`•V�n3.� • 17`••.1Ho7�p
vv-,9o�i•v� ...v}1v ei.-Jsan.n I 71' sar, )
1 &I 4 noon
I .
f � i
II 'I I¶- z::
• LY, �„�
�'brvvF;O 3no �-�•---
OSI J
i
...
•
. .
-7
t
1
a 1.---;-:44:,..O:,- ,`%"'
. i I
I I
. .
. I
1 1I
7— •
. I
•
I I ......,
...., 1 ,______F___
r— —1--- -; ,) 1 •
L__ _ _, J j . i . .
Or 5V16.01,46,
I ' Al noo- ,........
I
(t). I
..._, 1 ,
(..) .;:‘, I ' .
I L_--J I
II
I I
,, I I . . , , r . . -.--• .
- . I
I
I . I
1
ROo it............
-ffl?gtap .-,_ . 1 i-1 , I .
1
I 2 - s I I 7 I 6 1 to I I r: 17. 15 14 is . I illie 11 7.0 i 7! 21
• ",i, 2>
.
e__
c= icip I= Cr 1=1 = 1.7 = •\,
...' V Z•74.'j..71;'44,1,... ." TWA j•7— I 1
. .
---. .—.-- --_ ---. —-—--- --
.1.....1''.4:'::i Z... `....,.." . l'•-•'(I. .1,'
7.0.
4' r
our. ....w.,......,‘„
...hove.
• ..2E r /-.!. S' i?i (----A.4.4.p.-r (10
... .• :-• ,.• :.. :, .
f7.21-11-111-4.h..r..-r pita...son-14
N 0 ren4 raberot-+ orie-,!..
CD ----7 .. 1H.•ri--:Z2e :1‹:-.'--r1.1-Ak--.-:.:, 1coo sP
Yea11-79"
• . 7/24.4,51
. . .
. •
. ,
. .. • ''•
.-.;re,......- a000 -....oneo.
.-.. o....,..................,, ...,....,
•
• 411.a Fo(e.I01.1..ir.,,o1-.....•oer Nflneni . .
. •
.-
- . •
I - I ' 1 i • - 1 1 I
I , , . . .
IlillIT
• ••••-•,4,
! ./
I . :. I ' /.."'-'' ''- ' I I /...1 .
. 1 '
5.•-•o....f
:`,.. I I i I 1 " •. • .
1 1 1 \, I -Z_.; ! ii , • I . 1111i ill --........... t
• s. -----1-,-..• _ fi.._ . _;___
. I I
-4 .---m- •••-:- i.,_._.7., 1.-.\ I
...—.1' .,1!!./ .-.-.-1 I_-•:11 ---.., .- - .. -
— _•_ •. •,._•:. !.I, .
,..---
. , -"-'.--=-.*_-'-.7•.z••.-L•,:'•77:--..1." ,l1.— \
= _ . -- - _ , .Lr.-
,';'i ,--—' •,,....
.,,-•,—• -....-.---,-,-,7-1••1—.• .
-,----. • —
7 7 , - I.-7-7 1 •,___.,. i
...--,..:b4.. --o
. .. ‘‘,.... .........-. et,.AES
.-rd 10-•/k... .....-...
!--1 -;
4 ..c•
-.. •
• -,:•;,...:;•...:.,_,.._-m, 7.f..,.......::-Z.--
J:ICI'. •-:: .. ...-:-.---
. ,.:0'/'-:.-•
•
. •..- .
......., _ ,,. ,..• •-.. ,.........:4
...- „=.... ,•..J•••n
,
_.. 'III'.........„.„
• . V
I • t I • . : '...-..,...Kr.
• • -.• 'I---. f 7:•‘.:7 I. •• :',...,
....I''... i _... I .
. /
/ ...b,
• -.-..-r-- _• -.----.-.
...-.-
. I I .-.-•; ..,... .--. ...-. I.-;-: ..--• ..-• ......I • ....-, . . ...-•
I I •i/ •;I 1. • , / =. -. '-' '7"• 7 7:' , - - -,
_ _
____ ____ 7 71 .1;.I 1.1 i'l l'i .' !:I il i 1 ....: , • . . •
,_:.: —. ._. ..._: _ -4.: _ .. ,, I ors.... 1 _ '.__.;I j- . ‘.. • '.."..-...-1.4' .- '7'• "- - '-'. 'i-.: •- - .- - '-7. - - -• •- -
' --. .--,' -1 ,-. . -
.-- - .- -... . --; :-- - . .........-...., - -: .._. - -
• t:I 1 IT :t7-El -...
• _, .
,.... .....,. ..-
14,-....f. . . ......:: .'..-: .... *. . , .
.........1 V,...r.-.. . , .
-- 1
1 \
-- --
— -
..-'
- 12 "r••/IIV•••••411 •
. .. I.- I .....C•-••.•..1
•------ ; ; '' I I •
•
:t•I-.I.I..1'..::I:li ii".!!t•:-.2 i "dale:•A:4 1
''.. 1.rrr.+"1.:7'1'..:;....7;"•': •
• - /
. F Z..:.1 I I...i I I.••:a A,.Z.....'. ‘IIII•••%.- •:"L..:-7'I,...1 5...L....---_-,,,/,-,...--7:.. ....... '7,,,,-,-.....2.--
4`f2.;: •A c%* • .• • ..1..1?,..'e..:-:.
i •
.-9'
.--=:,
........ri,,/••••r t. "'"" ,.__,-,-7;..., , ;
c '.1..-:. ,.. .- - .., • --.,
••./......7 7 .... . .....
....L •. ..„./...../... • •
. > . . •
-,.. .. .........,r- ' i i I I • <1
. -N, . i • ; ‘..-,..T...... i, 1
. I
1
_..........„_-: .,
,i,!lv,. _ .:.•..,,,„• .., ... .. .
.--
tr.---.•• r• rr-..,•:-• I : .
. "' . ',..:' . .... •—• ".'1".--. ----1 -: FT1 .. M :ii:. ;.:.11 iii. . .i._ . , ,
._- .r,___,.. ...-__...,• r-i.• ,.____! • ,_.: ----,,s-r r....,e lir ncs-r n.°..4.7.
'-t.._-:;21' ------_--__.--____—_ . , i. '!:111 II, .1 , L.-:__.. 1-.-1.....---.;•:
.1h11111 1.11i;„1:1
• --,- ------:--.
go,64.ca--r-•*.,..... .______t.t____.....
• ---•STucC.a,
...,.....2.-T
• I
• \/••.a.,‘ [..•5\/,A'.1.'I 4 . 'r' .
I."2. . •
. • I
,A -17 !---
.
q ee.4-c,.'
•
•
411
>�::HEARIN EXAMI E
gild f t G ARI
COMMENCING AT 9 : 00 AM., OCTOBER 31, 1989
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING
The applications) listed are in order of application
number only and not necessarily the order in which they
will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the
discretion of the Hearing Examiner.
PROJECT NAME: Penta Group
Renton Office Building
PROJECT NUMBERS: ECF; SA-055-89
Project Description: Applicant seeks site plan approval
for the construction of a new one- ti
story, 13 , 607 square foot office
building, including twenty-five
(25) under-building parking spaces
and thirty-eight (38) above-ground
parking spaces.
r'
_ L
ti.
•
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
APPLICANT: Penta Group
FILE NUMBER: ECF; SA-055-89
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and
Raymond Avenue S.W.
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks site plan approval
for the construction of a new one-story
13 , 607 square foot office building (with
subterranean and ground level parking)
on a vacant .77 acre parcel.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Owner of Record: The Penta Group
2 . Applicant: The Penta Group
3 . Existing Zoning: Manufacturing Park (M-P)
4 . Existing Zoning in the Area: 'Manufacturing Park (M-P) ; Office
Park (O-P) .
5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park
6. Size of Property: . 77 acre
7 . Access: S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Ave. S.W.
8. Land Use: Vacant land
9 . Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Grady Way, Manufacturing,
Vacant land; Burlington Northern
Railroad lines.
East: Manufacturing; offices;
vacant land.
South: Manufacturing; offices;
vacant land.
West: Manufacturing; offices;
vacant land.
C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: .
Action File . Ordinance Date
Initial annexation N/A 1745 4-14-59 - + "�
Amended (definition) N/A 1764 5-27-59
Amended (definition) N/A 1928 2-22-61
Amended (Renton/Tukwila N/A 4040 2-4-87
Boundary Adjustment)
Rezoned to B-1 N/A 3811 . 5-7-84
• PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER
Renton Office Building
PUBLIC HEARING
October 31, 1989
Page 2
Rezoned to M-P (Area- N/A 4036 12-22-86
Wide Valley Rezone)
D. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1. Utilities
a. . Water: Twelve-inch water mains run along S.W. Grady Way and
Raymond Ave. S.W.
b. Sewer: Twelve-inch sanitary sewer runs along Raymond Ave.
S.W.
c. Storm Water Drainage: There is a twelve-inch storm drain
that runs north on Raymond Ave. S.W. and an eighteen-inch
storm drain that runs along S.W. Grady Way. Some storm
water enters these drains by way of catch basins and some
runoff water drains south on the surface of Raymond Ave.
S.W.
2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per
ordinance requirements.
3 . Transit: Metro routes 163, 240, 340, and 912 run along S.W.
Grady Way.
4 . Schools: N/A
5. Recreation: Fort Dent Park is approximately one and one-half
miles northwest of the subject site. Liberty Park is
approximately one and one-half miles northeast of the subject
site.
E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE:
1. Section 4-730, Manufacturing Park (M-P) District
2 . Section 4-738, Site Plan Review.
F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL
CITY DOCUMENT:
1. Green River Valley Policy Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive
Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 31-50) .
2 . Industrial Goal, Objectives and Policies, City of Renton
Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 18-19) .
3 . Urban Design Goal, Objectives and Policies, City of Renton
Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 11-14) .
G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1. The proposed 13 , 607 square foot one-story office complex over a
subterranean garage with 25 parking spaces, and with 38 ground level
parking spaces, is designed to be compatible with neighboring existing
and/or permitted uses in this Manufacturing Park zone. The complex is
also intended to be developed with services complementary to those
nearby uses.
The project site is defined as a "small lot" in the Manufacturing Park
Zone, based upon its size of .77 acre. The proposed one-story complex
is consistent with development standards for small parcels in that zone.
The structure is planned to be completed with exterior amenities (see
Section 4 .c) designed to enhance the site. The complex is situated on
the site so that transportation, noise, light and related impacts can be
PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER
Renton Office Building
PUBLIC HEARING
October 31, 1989
Page 3
mitigated and so that there is sufficient space for the inclusion of
landscaping and outdoor amenities for employees at the complex.
2 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA
(RCW 43 . 21 (C) , 1971, as amended) the Environmental Review Committee
reviewed the project and identified likely impacts in the areas of
aesthetics, transportation, public services, noise, light and glare. A
Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, was issued by the
Environmental Review Committee on September 6, 1989, with the following
conditions, as designed to address the above referenced impacts:
a. That the applicant be required to: 1) provide adjacent off-site
improvements (e.g. curbs, gutters,, streetlighting) ; 2) provide a
latecomer's fee of $1, 188 . 18 for the construction of the traffic
signal at S.W. Grady Way and Powell Avenue S.W. ; and 3) develop a
traffic mitigation plan for direct regional improvements OR make a
voluntary contribution of $48 ,955. 81 to the pending Grady Way TBZ.
(Note: In the event that the. Grady Way TBZ is approved by the City
Council, in advance of the completion of the appeal period for
environmental review for this project, staff will recommend that
the TBZ contribution be converted to a required fee) .
b. That the applicant provide a downstream analysis and storm drainage
management plan to comply with requirements established by the
Public Works Department (e.g. , oil/water separators, on-site
detention, 10 year storage) , in advance of the issuance of site
preparation/building permits.
c. That the applicant be required to provide insulation to the
proposed structure to limit interior ambient noise levels to 50 dBA
to mitigate noise impacts.
d. That the applicant provide a plan for on-site recreational
amenities to serve office complex employees, such as picnic tables
and outdoor seating in the landscaped areas, subject to approval by
the Planning Division and the. Parks and Recreation Division in
advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits.
e. That the applicant be required to provide a construction plan,
including: 1) an erosion control plan; 2) a plan for hours of
construction operations; 3) a plan for off-site hauling hours and
hauling routes; 4) ' a plan for periodic site watering and wheel-
washing of construction trucks; and 5) a $2 , 000 street-cleaning
bond.
These plans should be subject to approval by the Public Works
Department in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building
permits.
3 . Representatives of various City departments have reviewed and
commented upon. the proposed development. The content of those comments
is incorporated into this report.
4 . Site Plan Review Criteria: The City's Zoning Ordinance (Section 4-
738 . D. 1) requires that the Hearing Examiner review the proposed site
plan, with emphasis upon the following criteria:
a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and
policies:
The proposed development conforms with the Comprehensive Plan Map
designation of the site for "Manufacturing Park/Office" , as well as
with Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies and Objectives for
Industrial development, for Urban Design and for the Green River
Valley. For example, the proposed development addresses Urban '
Design Objective (A) which calls for growth to occur in a 'timely
and logical progression in the existing urban area to maximize use
of available services, (B) which calls for maintenance of district
PRELIMINARY REPORT, THE HEARING EXAMINER
Renton Office Building
PUBLIC HEARING
October 31, 1989
Page 4
integrity, and (C) which calls for landscaping to screen activities
from abutting uses. As well, the proposed development complies
with Industrial Goals designed to promote the development and
maintenance of industrial facilities, Policy A. l. which calls for
compatibility between uses; Policy A.2 . which calls for
developments to be convenient to major transportation corridors;
and Policy A.5. which calls for supportive/convenience uses to be
near industrial developments.
b. Conformance with existing land use regulations
The proposed complex is generally consistent with respect to use
and to standards (e.g. height, setbacks, bulk) for the development
of small lots in the Manufacturing Park zone (4-730) . Similarly,
the planned use generally conforms to the Parking and Loading
Ordinance (4-2204) and the Landscaping Ordinance (4-744) .
c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses:
Impacts to surrounding sites from, the proposed development have
been identified in these areas: aesthetics, transportation, light
and glare, and public services.
The applicant has generally addressed likely aesthetic impacts to
the community by proposing a complex which is attractive,
functional, and compatible in design to other developments in the
vicinity. Proposed exterior materials (stucco and wood siding, and
hipped tile/metal roofing) , articulated facades, screening of roof-
top equipment, generous landscaping, and on-site parking are
designed to mitigate aesthetic impacts. Exterior illumination and
signage plans will be recommended by staff to be designed to
mitigate aesthetic impacts as well.
Transportation, public service, noise, and light and glare impacts
will be discussed below (Sections 4 . f. , 4 .g. , 4 .h, 4 . i) .
d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site:
Impacts to the site from the proposed development have been
identified in the following areas: aesthetics, transportation,
noise, light and air, and public services (recreation and storm
water management) .
The applicant has generally addressed likely aesthetic impacts to
the site by proposing the above-described complex, which is
compatible with the small size and the flat, rectangular
configuration of the site. The proposed exterior
materials/facades, an ample number of large windows, landscaping,
and on-site parking create a pleasant environment for employees and
visitors. Recreation, pedestrian linkage, exterior illumination
and signage plans will be recommended by staff to be designed to
mitigate aesthetic impacts as well.
Transportation, recreation, noise, light and air, and public
service impacts will be addressed in Sections 4 . f - 4 . i. , below.
e. Conservation of area-wide property values:
The proposed development is anticipated to conserve area-wide
property values by virtue of the fact that it will provide a land
use upon a now vacant property, and by virtue of the intent to
develop the site with an office complex which provides services to
the nearby industrial community, as well as to the community-at-
large.
f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation:
The proposed vehicle access, circulation and parking plans are
generally in compliance with the Parking and Loading Ordinance and
PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER
Renton Office Building
PUBLIC HEARING
October 31, 1989
Page 5
related regulations as required to mitigate on-site transportation
impacts. (See Lind Memo 10/20/89) . Recommendations for exterior
illumination and signage should further increase safety and
efficiency of on-site vehicle movement.
Off-site traffic impacts are/can be similarly addressed through
proposed circulation plans, recommended signage and illumination
plans, and conditions established by the Environmental Review
Committee for improvements to adjacent and nearby rights-of-way.
The proposed ,vehicular access plans from Grady Way and Raymond
Avenue are acceptable. The proposed ingress/egress route adjacent
to the alley on the southern perimeter of the property (permitted
by Section 4-2204 [1] of the Parking and Loading Ordinance) does
not generally pose a safety hazard -- the proposed development and
an adjacent professional office constitute the only existing
developments on the block which can utilize that access; nearby
residential and industrial developments are designed so that it is
neither necessary nor practical to utilize the alley for access.
Ingress/egress points to those properties exist on S.W. 12th
Street; the uses are well-away from the alley and are separated
from that right-of-way by wide, well-established landscape
corridors. There are two vacant lots adjacent to the site -- there
could be limited expansion of alley use with development of the
parcel to the west; it is likely that future access to the vacant
parcel to the south would be achieved from S.W. 12th Street. Staff
believe that the anticipated number of vehicles using the alley to
access local properties from proposed, existing and potential
developments can be safely accommodated; for this project staff
will recommend paving of the alley, as well as signage,
illumination and mirrors to provide a full view of the alley for
accessing vehicles) to provide additional protection of the safety
of persons and property.
Pedestrian linkage will need to be improved by pathways (raised
sidewalks, marked crosswalks, etc. ) connecting the complex with
parking areas, with on-site recreation areas and with the Grady
Way/Raymond Avenue corridors, to ensure safe transit for employees
and visitors. Additionally, recommendations for signage and
exterior illumination should further protect pedestrian travel.
g. Provision of adequate light and air:
The proposed complex includes a single-story office building above
a one-level subterranean parking garage. This structure is well
within the height and bulk standards for this Manufacturing Park
zone and compatible with surrounding developments so that adequate
light and air circulation is provided.
Additionally, the design of the structure (e.g. large glass
windows) and of the parking areas (subterranean and ground level)
is such that views are maintained in a way which protects safety
and addresses aesthetic impacts.
h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy
conditions:
1. Construction
Noise, dust and debris, and similar construction-related impacts
are anticipated in conjunction with the development of the proposed
office complex with subterranean and ground level parking areas.
Conditions recommended by the Environmental Review Committee to
address these impacts are believed to be sufficient to protect the
site and surrounding properties.
IO,PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER •
Renton Office Building
PUBLIC HEARING
October 31, 1989
Page 6
2 . Operations
Noise impacts from the proposed office complex are not anticipated
to be significant -- indeed they are anticipated to be less than
those impacts generated by vehicles travelling on nearby rights-of-
way or from area manufacturing operations.
Noise impacts to the site from area activities (industrial uses and
major rights-of-way) are potentially of concern. As a result, the
Environmental Review Committee has recommended that the proposed
office structure be insulated to achieve an interior ambient noise
level of 45 dBA to protect employees and visitors. Staff
recommends no additional noise mitigation measures.
No other harmful or unhealthy conditions are anticipated.
i°. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate
the proposed user:
Public services and utilities are generally available (or can be
improved by the proponent) to serve the proposed development.
Storm water management systems will need to be developed to address
local environmental characteristics (sandy soils, low elevation,
presence of off-site wetlands) ; conditions recommended by the
Environmental Review Committee (See Section G. 2 .b. ) are believed to
be sufficient to mitigate anticipated impacts.
Area recreational amenities are limited to Fort Dent Park,
approximately 1-1/2 miles to the west of the site, and Liberty
View, approximately 1-1/2 miles to the east of the site. As a
result, the Environmental Review Committee has established
conditions for the placement of recreational improvements (e.g.
outdoor seating areas) on the site (Section G. 2 .d) . No additional
mitigation measures are deemed necessary.
j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight
The proposed facility is expected to have a generally positive
impact on surrounding properties and on the local area as a whole
by providing for attractive, functional use of the site and by
effective mitigation of off-site impacts.
H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommend that the Hearing Examiner approve the 13 , 607 square
foot office complex proposed by the Penta Group (File #055-89) with
the following conditions:
1. That the applicant provide plans to address all conditions
established by the Environmental Review Committee on September 6,
1989, in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building
permits for the project.
2 . That the applicant provide a signage plan, subject to the
approval of the Planning Division, in advance of the issuance of
site preparation/building permits for the project. (*)
3 . That the applicant provide an exterior lighting plan, subject to
the approval of the Planning Division, in advance of the issuance
of site preparation/building permits for the project. (*)
4 . That the applicant provide a plan for vehicle access protection
to/from the subterreanean garage, on the south side of the
property, abutting the alley, including signage, lighting, and
side-view mirrors, subject to the approval of the Planning Division
and Traffic Engineering Division, in advance of the issuance of
site preparation/building permits for the project. (*)
PRELIMINARY REPORT . THE HEARING EXAMINER •
Renton Office Building
PUBLIC HEARING_
October 31, 1989
Page 7
5. That the applicant provide a pedestrian linkage/circulation
plan (and a revised landscaping plan if linkage routes require
modifications to the existing landscaping plan) , subject to the
approval of the Planning Division, in advance of the issuance of
site preparation/building permits for the project. (*)
6. That the applicant provide a plan for an on-site recreation
area, (and a revised landscaping plan if linkage routes require
modifications to the existing landscaping plan) , subject to the
approval of the Planning Division, in advance of the issuance of
site preparation/building permits for the project. (*)
7 . That the applicant provide a plan for protection of windows on
the south side of the proposed structure abutting the alley
(against vandalism and flying gravel from the roadway) , subject to
the approval of the Building Division and the Fire Prevention
Bureau, in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building
permits for the project.
(*) The applicant is requested to submit these plans in advance of
public hearing to facilitate review and consideration.
• •
a
Sw • i ; •
_ 1 n •-) - o
� _ �� •
.-
1M
i f) ' I •
, .
I iiiil
•
z li, >� y'I
' , ,c,' . ,.a� w- 0.1
1` �I I� 'ellI1l�li o00T,-- -- •,( �.,1 '5;� Ill I► 1� 111TC8 ,:t 1111 l-1 t p��" ��I �;
. I . �1111111 .. -
• - �� '1 'r .'� �.0 �� 1 , l 1111111111i l •
,oR -- . 4u+► ` + 00,, �ll Ill yt.�►
111�1 ,� ( '-0®-� WI'{ \. '�M....�1plU z 1 /��I�� a�111 . I -- 'I-
�,� i q [� II Cfillt
1000 l % ç
2 1*I.MO°1 L
z.7.--; •------:____-------------• -- -- • .. nomiilatea I No i I I I' h. .1. \ .. .
..•..-' .I.. 1J-•L'' 'i-1 Nu. • ' -------- -:::---- .4....10;;iliciims r------------ iiiina ' Ina, .N., ::. .. •. . /
mei ,
I.- 57-45 _:_Ar-tili I li it ._,.., ).
i1L rq, riyii, 111, '•�n •,
lc
T..3�_t ram•:=- ' -'-'_
d
.. • ., I • •.. ) . ----...N t• i . • , \ ...
.y
1 11 �t • •
41 :__ �n . G
I 11 aVI >
_ __�—i--- — 7 Q _ .--: is
11.1
RENTON OFFICE BUILDING .. -
SA-055-89 ,ECF•
•
• APPLICANT The Penta Group TOTAL AREA . 83 acres
PRINCIPAL ACCESS SW Grady Way and Raymond Avenue •SW
EXISTING ZONING MP, Manufacturing Park
EXISTING USE vacant
PROPOSED USE Retail Office
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park
COMMENTS Located at SE corner of SW Grady Way and Raymond Avenue
S.W. ,
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
(MITIGATED)
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-055-89
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-055-89
PROPONENT: . Penta Group
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Appligant seeks site PP
plan approval for
the construction of a new one-story,
' 13 , 607, square foot office building,
including twenty-five (25) under-
building parking spaces and thirty-
eight (38) above-ground parking
spaces.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and
Raymond Avenue S.W.
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton
Community Development Department
Planning Division
The City o Renton Environmen
tal Review Committee has determined that
it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the
environment. An environmental impact , statement (EIS) is not required
under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation
measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority
of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) .
These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts
identified during the environmental review process.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation
measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this
proposal for fifteen (15) days from September 6, 1989 . Any interested
party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00
p.m. , September 21, 1989 , in order to be considered. A fourteen (14)
day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS.
Responsible Official:P Environmental Review Committee
c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator
Planning Division
Community Development Department
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
PUBLICATION DATE: September 6, 1989
DATE OF DECISION: August 30, 1989 .
SIGNATURES :
K n Nyb- Ly G ttmann
Come . ity D.i - ea - Iir= or -- 1 Pub is Works Director
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED
MITIGATION MEASURES
PROJECT: RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-0551189 •
APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-055-89
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval
for the construction of a new one-
story, 13 , 607 square foot office
building, including twenty-five
(25) under-building parking spaces
and thirty-eight (38) above-ground
parking spaces.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way
and Raymond Avenue S.W.
RECOMMENDATIONS : •
The Environmental Review Committee
issued a Determination of Non-
Significance-Mitigated with the
following conditions:
1. That the applicant be required to: 1) provide adjacent off-site
improvements (e.g. curbs, gutters, streetlighting) ; 2) provide a
latecomer's fee of $1, 188 . 18 for the construction of the traffic
signal at S .W. Grady Way and Powell Avenue S .W. ; and 3) develop a
traffic mitigation plan for direct regional improvements OR 'make
a voluntary contribution of $48 , 955 . 81 to the pending Grady Way
TBZ .
(Note: In the event that the Grady Way TBZ is approved by the
City Council, in advance of the completion of the appeal period
for environmental review for this project, staff will recommend
that the TBZ contribution be converted to a required fee) .
2 . That the applicant provide a downstream analysis and storm
drainage management plan to comply with requirements established
by the Public Works Department (e.g. oil/water separators, on-
site detention, 10 year storage) , in advance of the issuance of
site preparation/building permits.
3 . That the applicant be required to provide insulation to the
proposed structure to limit interior ambient noise levels to 50
dBA to mitigate noise impacts .
4 . That the applicant
pp provide a plan for on-site recreational
amenities to serve office complex employees, such as picnic
tables and outdoor seating in the landscaped areas, subject to
approval by the Planning Division and the Parks and Recreation
Division in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building
permits.
1enton Office Buildinc, ? •
Mitigation Measures
Page 2
5. That the applicant be required to provide a construction plan,
including: 1) an erosion control plan; 2) a plan for hours of
construction operations; 3) a plan for. off-site hauling hours and
hauling routes; 4) a plan for periodic site watering and wheel-
washing of construction trucks; and 5) a $2, 000 street-cleaning
bond.
These plans should be subject to approval by the Public Works
Department in advance of the issuance•)of site
preparation/building permits.
Note: At the time of site plan review, some revisions to design may be
required to further improve the attractiveness and efficiency of this
development, including but not limited t'o: 1) increased setbacks from
the adjacent alley-way or provision of protection for the south facade
of the building; 2) improvements to on-site/off-site pedestrian
linkage; 3) improvements to on-site exterior illumination; 4) a
better-defined signage plan; 5) improvements to the parking plan to
address requirements established in the Parking and Loading Ordinance;
6) improvements to landscaping to address recreational needs of
employees; and 7) traffic circulation patterns.
mmdoc
1.UH1.1u1. ITY DLVELOPMEN',' EPARTMEN'1'
, BUILDING DIVISION
• . PLANNING DIVISION '
• SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE • •
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS :
:OMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
rRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
)EVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 144 1989 .
•
tEVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: -fj`-� Neue)- 4-1(n
• APPROVED J APPROVED WITH CONDI
TIONS NOT APPROVED
y development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi-
nces.
;econd means of approved access is required. Fire apartment access roads/lanes shall be paved
nimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes No
'linii:iary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of
wuired. hydrants with a minimum flow of / o o
-equired. is
� gem each
mary hydrant is required to be within ; S'D
;ondary hydrants are required to be within feet of the oft structure.
ucture. feet of the
approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes' No
fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes _! o
fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior. to construction. Yes. c/No
•SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE ' CZ l/ 2
2 /Fo
REV. 6/88
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: . 1&iggVtZ11-1G�
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
- 4 17.,0 61-tit(u- I;5g-
. - 12-e-WeLd -
.T.
6-ry, r-tAA) 4cr
•
•
•
=32../ sus
DATE 6147
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
LAZE COMERS AGREEMu I
•
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT C(= _- ^4 5� /! T;00F
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT C;:".:.::: .;.:;:;:`l _ W/,4/3?.6,4 •
BUILDING DIVISION SPECIAL ASSESSMENT 1 .l 1...,.-'1 _ NO
SPHIAL ASSESSMENT C. :�::.:'1 A/0
PLANNING DIVISION C^PROVED WATER PLC;I Muhl,E
SHORT RANGE
•APPI:�;ED SEWER PLAN ri0 Muni E° iF sine SO:MOAN
1iPr1;OGED FIRE NYIIR,1::i •! . :i Yes
•
LONG RANGE BYr FIRE`, D:"T. J1 ` �1rn •
I - r: 1 r..'.I.Lvs:s t10� RE4tifrt.so
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENTiI`SUCC tE� ,J,$?, p¢ TSQ. cr X
/ 35, 950 s4-FT.
OTHERS :
•
:OMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
JRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
)EVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 14, 1989 .
ZEVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: . ()T/,L /T , �>J& .
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS )Q
NOT APPROVED
NLII(.E SVVARATC WATK 1)(A)3 FOIL EXTEHStiaH of- City S cJJCcT . s"cs1E4t DER
RENTo'rJ S1'1\*1% Amp RIYL V6lo0ER'1 ExTErl1i614S
REQLUfE IAoPE0 S'{STPr\ font fiu.E Flow -DEr1AK-U-
101 el
•
.//#4-y. • • t$J
;IGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE 23 —
�u-e- 8- iv- 8 9
8-/d- 8j QL REV. 6/88
ZEVIEWING DEPARTMENT DIVISION: CC—
APPROVED ✓APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
Si •
•
•
•
d a.(, TWA—
<. wcc.0 k LA*L4- ' .
•
,Artilkhlrbex us)-e5i•- .
•
•
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE
REV. 6/88
4 . Plants 0 0 °
5 . Animals ° ° °
6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° ° °
° ° °
7 . Environmental Health ° °
8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° °
°
•
9 . Housing ° ° ° ,
10 . Aesthetics ° 0 o
11. Light & Glare o ° °
°
12 . Recreation ° ° °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° VvV ° °
°
14 . Transportation ° ° °
15 . Public Services ° ° °
16. Utilities ° • ° °
COMMENTS : cY3 �Ym�-I i�c=c rc ,4o--yam
Ar
-( ,..t5:4-29---A-A-t-e___ Zi--//d_A- Ve ia.-- --e...4.-6-s-a-_, ee,„ee...0(___-
' g47(.- r :::7:12--1—\-- -4-1--1"--- 1-)7 ---.-" ///67) !"---e-C7-‘--
a�c��2/
. (--/?&f.---eL--------,—,--r ..„4„„....„_ .
-7---c3t,(..--,. • ,,,,,,. ,42„...../.t_f_....(-
_,......-6-/---,e__ \-- ....z.„...„--_ .7, . .
"' ---7 ,, ,. tea—_
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this
proposal
Tom . 1:-- 97:— o.c 2 7
-Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
Date
Rev. 6/88
•
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: B L I
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS P NOT APPROVED
?)cA)Lti/� L �lL --P> -I—L c� S 9 �,Y�C'/C /O � -',
t` , O J,,
L�Nt J, i-i� G of ALLBci / N Odz_ D &- <n d�
1-� A u GS 0 Al ij''�u.1 6--;(7.-t o, . /'���. v CJ /i,
X'" �/U•2 SOc.� G,
c6; A iz-Al co.6-,:•-- •
/1.0 c . ( -. A (- - (.4 iv -2 a:,_d 1-62_, '-Y .1"'0 a,,:-.7 ,,,th.,,J6,5,_.)
''',../2
7//
)9—
DATE t
SIGNATURE OF DIIjE TOR R AUTIIO I ED REPRESENTATIVE
�� REV. 6/88
!,VIEWING DEPAR1'MEN'1'/DIV1S1w' • /,APFIG Z )!(4)NE ` n / I\l G
APPROVED /\ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
•
SEE ATTACHMENT
•
•
c.
4--y /r /i7Z57
;IGNATURE OF DIRE TOR OR AUTIHORIZED ESENTATIVE DATE
REV. 6/88
RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
PENTA GROUP
• SA-055-89
Southeast corner of SW Grady Way & Raymond Ave. SW
1 . Transportation Benefit Zone fee for SW Grady Way & Rainier corridor
Office General
Trip Rate 23.67
Bldg. Footage 13,607 sq. ft.
Fee Cost per Trip $152
23.67 x 13,607 = 322 trips generated
1 ,000
152 x 322 = $48,955.81 .) .mitigation fee
2. Traffic Signal Latecomer's Fee
SW Grady Way & Powell Ave. SW
Cost per Trip $3.69
Total Trips Generated 322
$3.69 x 322 = $1, 188. 18 ) latecomer's fee
Holvick de Regt Koering
Fee for Holvick de Regt Koering to be placed in holding account. No current
forwarding address. Company may be in bankruptcy.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN;, .EPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
•
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT •
\,
�` OTHERS : Stbv m , Y
;0MMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN •
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY •
)EVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 14., 1989 .
ZEVIEEWWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: S Y -,r1 �k \-e',
V APPROVED APPROVED WI
TH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
•
I) We" -I(r 4 I14-1t` Cf10e' C _, l✓rII her lfn 1)e a ��te%s- Dl l �l+ Ovh
girt r le 0 1/ (,1/4-1 c.Y 54.Jd�1.•nIc/ 4.- 1-n(� rP1l► riC. of tSChAry S rhfv
Cy (s i_1 5 10/rt-1 cIP r rt nj.c s y s icp-7 .
.1) A 1(r��f�cVl/`J 1.r• r.StC re-,)-1 r (7) • /)14h will 11( ✓eq (.,1-4 1-G y, (41)q "Le
(7.1 ow _1 r 1'G'S ' h r
3) � - 51 IC 2( tttrI()• IIC�1 r(I 1r I/ ri c,f � • I e. Ot)2 C^ 1-10✓1
• rr r(1 t.t t rG4✓U-'t 1 S I'✓' 1 I b E /.q ' ID yr S,1.0 f a,L./ (0 I(n( r C(r E sc
t'f � �fcCytc„ ). 7�ts 5/10 Id be def-,'ttcr'N 0 no 7 1n e�C.�sC �q � rvvl v��
ro, -Ihr Z.. cyticJ IVn ° pov tJ,-lt " s7oe)t.t f. ri'M re e �G (a Cd�alri-(o✓!S , / �{�
•
,(( 14 477 Crr)1 /)v ?C 1GI1 i 'c•'/t J het' 1 d h•e j,( Sc-5 YI
/ - 11owrIs1 '' CRv „(t 1/,S,S Ic ( p �� % )-�, '1e G{.4atMSI (V6vvi wrI( be. verl(irk
l 4; - dc4ft
$ I
DATE /
;IGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE •
REV. 6/88
EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: �,{��� C,p�� 1 �� roIy�Slor�
APPROVED -
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
•
I-Goo 14troloicAtio Y1IZ,K IQCo T-C3 kOj A(X J1
MAE. cbU Il,b I Vo '1'I it
Co rnP►.i r P K I ti 6 /4,IZX 'ro rs�, g I/2 1 uu p a
v-ti Nr w)Jo E),
PPZov\DE \D ,`Q ik)Pk&J ��Iv�'�5 1-10 R YVNOND 1WV\41U ,
1 -VI-M. I`1" P -,VEO) ►\J b 144 b
t) c-c-N 37140DARc Ns \'C L{ 11(,It j pNIT or
io S p rsc.
PI�IZi<I�i(ow
C1�r DATE �� x2 - c
IGNATURE OF DI TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1 q
REV. 6/88
X TY HAW ax.G:I,Ja &cued DLJI:D,,.IG,.
MShuw1 sc.IT,....).
/ . ' .
• 4 •
S.W. Cq RADY WAY I
W4n114 alo,etLITT. (lac?RDV.) L•(n,•T) ¢ We
1 .+lii L+D•.L..:L It
/
N p�� SIG'V wocL�-nD..c;... i ,�,r -w* D
/` -- / 31 e - .�D-�I.LhR IV.Kf`f.HJK. 54I': - — — •
-- - - -_ -
QJJ
I • I tiJ
/ / .. I •
I oM6 i17� I .� .. 'r " ,0.7 .� !! -
J _1
�2• .JN CJU, C I .iaT RDJTa.J VAN /
v r• urr/•c LfJµ TRRt.J/ Q I VGTDR+..+r
1 I /= I o, vrw▪ ..... /•°'n'r - - l DO s.+.aMc} r.d�. N -
/--- 1 ._
�T _ =fir __ l <_
./
///
112.; I u..cc :;wo 2-
u 0
ez,
I L. _ I PJLL7 JNIuf.RLD �. /" N J•
- /
Iv
I • `•+N Re[+[RT GYI611.:0.ALi3.(!L'v) w .
/\ • aL,GT,..n w.RRl..0 Lai
I c.w utx.••I
•
PKO7f.17 2. -1
- t L+.MJ10?RY am�l:�aiF/�E=(yUczys.et.4C 1n�dC eatL../4e-
�ffi, --•£Ttr�. —C 2fE LN--lERaHS e•'a+_i!l/�_-
`
ap FFELIMINAgY SIS pAki - (.i .
OIVMf C JaJDSWJ*
I°•20�-a' b/1'i/D9 - ..A...4.1411 R......... v.Y.
t,/. ((,/en Fw00P eY sal .d v.(III,.f)
..J !.cur
rat 5I2/51 014,410C LDC .,.J.
�,y�,���J RE. 7/1V/81 RSA IQV, roll Goy.
ELJWC(UQ s-n-E2 54910eT'4NE RKi G:o. •II20 RrQ 11 Rio
GTIa`E l.1A34.OBEO IS17 DfA/IDGD
©sRwe...f uNDSL w f' It'd1 OAR?' DRPWI-1�
17..f VT K4 _� ?�---L:
Sz,sfo V: .02 •rrl s/[iLiJICV .
bp;ss c9-01 /�I"'�II
• L
• S/1r./D1
• 4et 74L/81
Lenz/t •
--. - —-.---_- - -- u s-swum--Lo9 — - •
----=3�t�o NP,t'-a- n1-�r
__ k NII" .LxvMl f-+t1�a—.
•
v'O ,OZE
]„O1 1],i0• 1,N2.. ] M1 19'n� 1ve1 1l.oy f 1To1T1]1g1
•
-ter 1,1s'r1w� - Ix .7►91,10+Z' % .1
II
7 H.. O it . �' �-( -- 9. i� O . . _ rx
•
•
.OS OL • • ! ,LI 13
r •
_—f�-'-'l r
O o O O o o'er"4 �` v� _ . ,
.or y _ 'oi /� e
I . L
.02 ;` ^ • II• • I''• '.. ,07 I ,OS -� t - ›.. .1L
- Y -—J - �/ ..�iGnr,� 1/YJl+OJ(b) 17 vd NO CO �h`M `-wv •
17'.'JN07 F
ryll .
i •
:1 I (b1
`•-1d 1 o,i,3'1nn JAL
h
I. L a. i ,
001 J
i'
•
, . .
•
. .
•
. •
•
, ilall''IlA (1)
4, 5 °col. ;31.- -..r, 5W214-..'1 .-fg. - --7 : -
9*-214..to rio.3.-HF..,1 tilsot-i
icriu4s•-rato ).-s-writHilsxd
-- --
\ ....
. •
61....olic, ri
..1...rn, _:_Q-,co____.21 i) -1-AlTha--- • e t • • ..1'.".•'
( . ':::-t .:•.::4,:::::
.01.
,, .c..,
• ._ _ _____ _ 7=7__ _ _ ____. _=_____ • _ _ ____
I I 'l'- wal.. -• -•'kJ-54 1:.:-.--,* --.
—= .. ..,. -,
1.1 I I I
I 21 .j 11 o 1 I. 9 L i, 5 . = 7.I I• Sr=
i I :1
rolT i
---.7-- --1 —zT7c-- 9 -
d=e—.....,J ,,
=J.5.114 V-.7.al I
...: irm-Irly.rg ..., ' Ja
sums
inamm
WORM.111111
I •
S:41
I .
1 _. , , . .. , • ... ,
I - - 1 c") ri - I i•---1 1:, .L______1_
_ "---i
0
--,
1 (.9„...,00-;,-„,--..„7-i„J-v,-,,
,-
I
1 . .
T-- . .
—___—Y.————1 . ' I . .
7 - I
. . I •
I I—
I, . •
1 . 1 1 ;_...,. ; L __ _ 1
___. .....4 1 1 I i
I 0- . • --
I .
'41;)
I .
$Oold .1.3114 1.",..___„....71 ..÷.
(„....—4•1•1101, AO 3Nti
I
L__ 1
- , ___I• _ o.
•
,
•
L9/..TZ/L
EL,:) • _ - .t.4,1,so •;-'"-::•:-.1 ZI-..*rt,--,
-.*:'! -*.• • .';-•• .--0
- .
V", .gi0 1-10..14-•YaN
191-itt•N'a.C. ,i--l--11-11kIl1'F'44
•
h..1. 101--t ..L.DNel---411,-111- • •
6:-.0AV,31.:.A.,-,::-.;;?-titrAii-•
`71=?F'9F "-1 -
1.9-.•Xl.f..1;,9174,,,
.1.9•••-19 ZI..•V,.
_ , -•
-- in * ._, _____2..- ____ _ - - —,.. ...•:---8•••=.----
7-',1 11'411111
..„..... 7 _, ."71-• = ;,. i II 11771.1 IF '--• 7; .. ._17.1r.-77-- -- 0 • „_ 1 '
• • WE :I- /7 - 1,A?// Il•1//1 I
1
1 ' ii.• ,
. ...
oz. 0 /•,; so 1, /;ir d./iv/ ,s , .
.,,,, • • , • 1 ,•,;. , l• .1 1
. / 1 ,11„ SS; S, Eli. 4 .a U , — • . MA -• //' i 1 'i RBI'
... . 1
. _.... . .
...g •
.. ...-
'
. i. .. ,
0.
.1 I t 1 I Pri. _ _ ....,••••• gm_. .____-_,EMEND
11111, . P.7
. ' . ' I I I . -....-........-m=. •
riligh1111%Willawillgi I --- IPP
•
• - •-.....4,4-(5.11WI.J.•- _ .
' N' ativri-(sm.-inn.2)•0•9.7 r1.49
f•••••11•0• 41,...)-,•%./i..“-••.,.
A oov -1--e,141‘.4
. - '5' 01[77 '011ili J.Al . •.
.
. '
0
•
•
•• .„:.:;
i. .1 --a'2s&ii..,
. a
71 0 iy01•"rb It
P'�1=nG/i :. •, 1 4 . ir{:.
r-toll-`•;inl� Nlnos )-. ,dNiwia
..:..yl.cit..L7.�,1._
E:%r '+�#4:;.;'-----
HI bntT3,c _
• _ . I' - . I ' _ _ P
L.�- _ • _• ! F - _ • '_ :•
C _. .� _ O Imo" _. 'J LJ � . . _ Q ._ L: = ` .ter ] a .,] _ J L. ; _ • II, )7
4oy�e J oTnL'1-� 1
U"Oi.1-•••00 --,
•
a
... ,
. 7; ..• :.; 1
. _
1-7• 't•: t' '------"‘ :1,_ 0 i• • . 1 ''•
gt' f-,';'....:-' I—- 11-'=1-• '- •--- • ' .'
...--- __2.-1..S L__.,=::• — - --1
...... —,
k„,_ ,,.., 1_.-._.....ss .—. '• ...--rS5•1•PLcoR
5.01.1•1
• . n•
. .
• .
. .
. _
. .
Pc;,,petw• z__... _.
• •-•c rikrt,tA_.,..., . • - .
i"..S.7:34:3;1 i:. • • . -, dI• ..i.....PV.."...
,..e.1......':C 1101 i I i
I.H;kF ...........,„„• •'',i 1 ' v-7‘:;''''..Th'
' T1 1 . 1 I
• •'''') -t-. - 'i!IIPi
•.1
,I il
ii;.' ..,ili., .,
" li • .
11
1, .11...,
.•ii II, i
4'.,,l'!",,-,;,? .. „ I tl&St FL0014,1 "11' 1 • I.--' EP
•ii C .. f:;.'....1.i. 7.1.,•L'-:.,-••:, .,.. 11
'I I '''111111111 I ..------------.'--
-.ktAtio•N.;,-...1...,:. ---.•
.1'.t.: ...----
I
A.L.l.EN' r s•••STuct..0
tn.........11n,
\./A',—r i o 1-1 . M5..L1H 11-4A1Z-f. P ../1 i...1 41
1/8'-r-o" - - •ggi-.-rie,i4E.:, _ c,-/-s-----
•
14/'24 A3.3
w/21/5
v-d, rNQ 11- �s
1 1.4.:30 HO lh ?J
E7 r 1 MbzGl ,.zi-or 1 Hi-r- a .
d
_r_ y. .n,�
I alsrT� c�.y Y',7HR9 VS?
xw+y,p✓ L,,,_„ •
���— �' .i .N.I:� r:i'�'•
1 "7E-- ---I Q�i' ...Hi,wi�uJ I �— ) •• ..1.0.....2.S, rat �' ri •..i li
•
•
IL - - E •'�-'ore
1--J
•
___, ____:________
Z.-.w
i
—•
ii:,____ ::,....,..,,,....7..
s •
-
•
l..•J':'lY rI '1.,,arvattyAH 79Y6_ 'LHJL'M.�:D lmr++w,.RL �1t.G TU� i
-s+.-fa•
( —a� T'
1 n .� — , t i�YM .�Q1/?l9 S
YJ IKINIJ�
.i —v
• i 1 gFnYYI i ' 9F NY?fOIMI
IL L-tJ -
11 7iv.J
rMtYflS'e1/0071
. E
_ . . . .
a
. .
• .
- .
.
0 ' 1
t .
1 ..-•-"-- .,.. _
i -•
1 .."---...........:
r 1 .
•- .
A-r-r1C-. * • , - • .
. .
.14. ..'..--.<
. .
31
....' .11
.
. -
_ __ . .- .
. .
. — L../ GRAZ"(._WAY __ca..,1 _LL''''''' 11
---*---
•
----- ,—,..--,..,-7, •
...... . .. 7.....•. • .. • . . . ... .........: ...---....-._-....-,.....,____:__-. 8 1 '-"----- ---"--•-,_..4_DASe...,...5.14-r 451Jact, 1 i. .A......c, ,...:. -.
-, Lh..______ _____ 4. .
li .. .
. .GE.c-T-1 c)r---1 - - c •
• • yo--..-.• ----- .
- .
. .
• • .
. .
. •
. . .
•
• . • - .
TTE-t-IM I ki AR I OR A\il I F.-161
•
IZ .4--1-1-01,-1 ,PF F I‘4
..11 - ,
.
4..yr. 77.„.:- ,••,... - ...
,-.•
•-.--••,-,,;-1 ::.• ,, •
• •--•••,. t;. : ..•::: .
571z/61 .
. ._
r-ev•-11.e../e,i
- -
,.., ,.:..„.,. _.
4..,--,a,-:••:,, ,....:...f. --.,,... .:. . • - - .
0 0 .
env 712,04. '
3
t
•
•
•
i • I
..'./. G(RADY \-" 1' _
—.—Y.c • ... .' 1""D .Jain..' (ixJ cvv) ..6 ..v
— i,:
•L -Y; 'r _ __ - u T - o ut4 i �° 1_-----L—......„......"..... i:-..v.-....i....,-- ..-..:-:-_.;_7_-...f ,..T.....•,,,.,.•_•-....--.,.....1.:a:l_::f
-'� / N -....: f - I I ram~ nM.....1 o--,
:.'''''.
_
•
_ :) :` ! � 0 I
•
] •
1 VJ�IDIO JNFDUMr .1 ,• y1: ) cuNws `�N./�. \ X ///
, VI. •
. ISTINb 0•.IG.
t
' . . j.22 7.1"1. 72•'•' /
1 �--.7 �` •ram Ntsw ova STORY o vIer: WIL.P1I-14 7 — /..L /!I
t.`.:7;",?...1' ?7, :\/ jj c . ---....___ ru in- u. 3 1.."........ail • ......---, -. / .3-,....j
•
S sort~..—..iY• .o.11:7..+c cY /
\/ _�=—� ` _•..� .. .w.a 1GIl1�A—.WJT(I{�vr_ •1`� i.+.l�45— .
. . �' �-
- � / 1 '-a
• • .'..r Gam. (¢.RAu • ....n..
G •epc \\
> •
•
Y
•
} .r«rk _ LEGEND
3 Pr-LIMINARY (��ADIN(a i U'(ILI-rI�h F1.$1� -M"�"` '~..CW(..n
0„0, Fo..
o .�. r
. •
•CD
..7
a—u+s. emn.n
uvar. x..en••+• ::::EST.
...,rya
• ---.wvenrr '--
c -JAEGER'ENGINEERING . r :
" - - i 6bSE3P6•SL /4birnWa. 98 2.. (20.6*36-0Q86 - �-
c , ,
1 6 b
•• i i l 1 I'Ja
I
_-_ I M s 3 o
(•")b'
I -.As,- Y,-' a)
3Na 5
'
. 1 I
A
1
tS 1
1 I
us
7�
X
a
_.w.„,„,. . ..,,,-, , ,,,.,,,,,,., .
4 .
lir ir."4'4"111- i.
ii .
s°4-' N i-- 1
i 4' ! 7,
Ogli-i 1 t' •
� �
Pi A
i ffil iNI-In gHt' s ) „my). k i. /
� 1 Is'N, 0 I i i *W., 73 -Fc "r):
A
Rw � i I
Q II' ,n
T11/1
�II 1
•
3 5 as 1I
i __._ l `P .
1 11 i I : I
4 1 - i i 0 1 i grikAVP i 44111 a
I .1 1- i) t' VI A 13 0401 Z,-1 •
i -101 k 4 I'li , tIr'' -:1. .a T___ •
: Ilh t li- lilt W Ili "dh V I 114i
ILhh QflI • ' 1:1111
• ! [1] [] I 0% ' t Ill a \
., 1 _`
•
y ____
t•i.1 1,;
1'4l;
, i;',
411
DATE: October 20, 1989
TO: File
FROM: Jerry Lind cy
SUBJECT: PENTA BUILDING - PARKING REQUIREMENTS
FILE NO. ECF, SA-055-89
A plan check of the parking requirements for the above
referenced office building has shown the following:
The office building has a net square footage of 12, 304
square feet of usable space. Office use requires 1 parking
stall per each 200 square feet of floor area, hence, 1:200 =
61.52 or 62 parking stalls are required and 63 stalls are
provided.
The parking is arranged as follows:
LOWER LEVEL
25 parking stalls are located beneath the building. The
stalls measure 9' x 20' with 24' of back-up space provided.
The back-up space includes the use of the 16' wide alley
which is allowed under the General Provision of the Parking
& Loading Ordinance, Section 4-2204 (1) . The alley is
required to be paved per the standards of the Public Works
Department.
UPPER LEVEL
38 parking stalls are located on the main level off of S.W.
Grady Way. Of this total, 16 stalls are compact stalls (30%
or 18 stalls are permitted) . The stalls are required to be
dimensioned at 8 1/2 ' x 16' and it appears that their width
shown is only 8' wide and therefore will need to be widened
an extra half foot each. One handicap parking stall is
required (2%) and 2 stalls have 'been provided measuring 12
1/2 ' x 20' . The remaining 20 parking stalls are standard
stalls dimensioned at 9' x 20' . All standard, compact and
handicap parking stalls require 24' of back-up space which
has been provided.
JFL:penta:dsk8
4-2202 4-2204 j
---.
11. Storage Lot. A specially designed area for parking or holding of operable motor ,,
vehicles or wheeled equipment for more than seventy two (72) hours. (See
bulk storage regulations for lots exceeding one acre in area.) '�
12. Tandem Parking. The parking of one motor vehicle behind another, where one
does not have direct access to a parking aisle without the moving of the other
vehicle. Tandem parking is allowed only in single-family and duplex residential
zones.
13. Uncovered Commercial Area. An area used for display purposes or for
commercial transactions not combined within a structure.
4-2203: USES AND CONDITIONS:
1. New Buildings and Building Additions. Off-street parking shall be provided in
accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance in the following cases:
A. The construction of new buildings or structures;
B. The enlargement or remodeling of an existing building/structure or land use
by more than one-third (Y3) of the area of building/structure or area of land
use; or
C. Paving of a parking lot with a permanent surface.
, i
2. Change in Use. When the occupancy of any land use, structure and/or building
or any part of a building, structure, and/or land use is changed to another use
requiring increased parking stalls, parking shall be provided to meet the parking
requirements of the new use, as specified in Section 4-2208. (Ord. 3988,
4-28-86)
3. Exemption for the Downtown Core Area. The downtown core area which is
described as that area bounded by the center lines of Smithers Avenue South _-.�
from South Fourth Place to South Third Avenue and Logan Avenue south from
South Third Street to the Cedar River, bounded on the north by Cedar River,
east to Mill Avenue South, south to South Fourth Street and west to Smithers
Avenue South shall be exempt from the provisions of this Ordinance. (Ord. 4124,
2-1-88)
4-2204: GENERAL PROVISIONS:
1
1. Use of Public Right of Way. Maneuvering space shall be completely off the j
right of way of any public street except for parking spaces provided for single-
family dwellings and duplexes. Alleys shall not be used for off-street parking
and loading_�_ purposes, but may be used for maneuvering space.
s
sr
2. Ingress/Egress.
A. Driveway Location.
(1) Industrial, Warehouse and Shopping Center Uses.
(a) The location of ingress and egress driveways shall be subject to
approval of the Public Works Department under curb cut permit `�/
procedures.
l
588
CITY OF RENTON
f. '`' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division
October 18, 1989
Dino Patis
The Penta Group
1815 Rolling Hills Ave. S.E.
Renton, Washington 98055
RE: Penta Group
Renton Office Building
ECF; SA-055-89
Dear Mr. Patis:
A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been
scheduled for Tuesday, October 31, 1989. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in
the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall.
The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public
hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you
have any questions, please call 235-2550.
ely,
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
DKE:dm
cc : Fred Steiner
8118 South 122nd
Seattle, WA
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550
FacsIm1Ie (206) 235-2513
OF
kEti
y'fff�fff 1 ��
i r{ V d © Z
Z
NI DaricE
O �
•,�� •9r6'0 SErc Oi'g
' City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner
will hold a
PUBLIC HEARING
•
in
•
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL
•'j ON October 31, 1989 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M.
P.M.
1
CONCERNING:
! PENTA GROUP
RENTON OFFICE BUILDING •
ECF-055-89; SA-055-89
APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW.
ONE-STORY, 13,607 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING, INCLUDING TWENTY-
FIVE (25) UNDER-BUILDING PARKING SPACES AND THIRTY-EIGHT (38)
ABOVE-GROUND PARKING SPACES.
- •
•
OW
•
IF: . BOW-- • RONI.1
• N tN roN i�\
R SM S
site R . •
� hNrr�"'J u �� —cn p'.—�-
� a w ,?,�„a1t12�
1'
? i 1 !
Ti•
; �yi,,A...4%1,.�.1, .illt i 1,?.'.n.et...:•/N+111 i I.1i,l:.e��: ,..•
1.
1 I III I
M i I ..I•,H. I La l "kall
GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS:
s1 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF S.W. GRADY WAY AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W.
•
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT
PROPER AUTHORIZATION
CERTIFICATION
I , MO,Y-1.3 90,1e.1o„ , HEREBY CERTIFY THATT '
THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 1I 3 COPIES OF
3 CONSPICUOUS
PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON Or.t I17NY''T .
•
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington •
residing in �G.�rt-a,� , on the
day of°Cif,/ Iggq SIGNED : f/)rv�,�� /a
OF R4,1,
a o
U t% z
P
O9gTco-
e"
City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner.
will hold a
PUBLIe .
HEARING '
In
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL
ON October 31, 1989 BEGINNING. A'T 9 : 00 A.M. .
P.M.
CONCERNING:
PENTA GROUP
RENTON OFFICE BUILDING '
ECF-055-89 ; SA-055-89
APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW.
ONE—STORY, 13 , 607 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING, INCLUDING TWENTY—
FIVE (25) UNDER—BUILDING PARKING SPACES AND THIRTY—EIGHT (38)
ABOVE—GROUND PARKING SPACES.
_ i.T .
E� NRI,. ; No
1- 0
•i„. .., • ING 0„,, &
gURLRooRN �L,N,S
,. • • •• � S `SS,o
• sICP N ID . . •
.
•
-----'------------ T;.iliih. "' . • -.1111mJi0!MIIP7 .
- lu,- Sv .4;0•13 i .
t
`o r ytiF}flit• 1 .
1 •
7, i I • 1 1
i M rr4..,�.:tl�`,�1. •U•k.• 405 4•;.•.n.��•.a•}14.sU11 I .4'',I:.M}�' a'':. • .
i I . • : I I
''. • ...1L " - - I VI
OQIINA
GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS:
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF S.W. GRADY WAY AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W. .
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE . REMOVED WITHOUT
PROPER AUTHORIZATION
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT
HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR
OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON OCTOBER 31, 1989, AT 9: 00
A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS:
PENTA GROUP
RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
ECF; SA-055-89
Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a new
one-story, 13, 607 sqsuare foot office building, including twenty-
five (25) under-building parking spaces and thirty-eight (38)
above-ground parking spaces. The property is located at the
southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way & Raymond Avenue S.W.
Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the
Renton Community Development Department.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE
PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON OCTOBER 31, 1989, AT 9: 00 A.M.
TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS.
Published: October 20, 1989
•
CITY OF RENTON
%r
•
° •
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division
September 22, 1989
•
Dino Patis
The Penta Group •
1815 Rolling Hills Avenue S.E. .
Renton, WA 98055
Re: Renton Office Building
SE Corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
File #SA-055-89
Dear Mr. Patis:
This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended.for the Determination of
Non-Significance-Mitigated for the above referenced project.
No comments were received. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed
to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on October 9, 1989. Any appeal
must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a
non-refundable $75.00 filing fee.
If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Lenora Blauman,
Senior Planner and project manager for this project, at 235-2550..
For the Environmental Review Committee,
nSincer
frttir
Donald K. Erickson, AICP .
Zoning Administrator
DKE:mjp
cc: Fred Steiner - -
8118 South 122nd
Seattle, Washington
•
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550
Facsimile final '?S-7S•IQ
.: V s 70G 7
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMEN AL
DETERMINATION
Environmental Review Commttee
D t h Fk i u K; a n x: ,being first duly sworn on oath states Renton, Washington
The Environmental Review Committee
that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-
Significance-Mitigated for the following pro-
VALLEY DAILY NEWS pro-
ject under the authorityhe f the Renton
Municipal Code. The following Applicant
• Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Ras completed a mitigation process.
RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
ECF; SA-055-89
Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers Applicant seeks site plan approval for the
construction of a new one-story, 13,607
are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six square foot office building, including
months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published twenty-five (25) under-building parking
in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King spacesrkg andp thirty-eight 38) above-ground
parking spaces. The project is located at
County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal the southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way
newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for and Raymond Avenue S.W.
Further Information regarding this action
King County. is available in the Community Development
Department, Municipal Building, Renton,
The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition Washington, 235-2550. This Determination
is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period
, Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in which will end at 5:00 PM on October 9.
supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers 1989. Any appeal of this decision may be
duringthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice a_ made to the City's Hearing Examiner,
Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South,
Renton, Washington. An appeal must state
N Lisa . Of r,Tvi—,141 �VAlitc.rw .nativI1 Y, in writing, why the Determination
should be revised and must be accompa-
nied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee.
was published on E jlt tart.s i 2 5 , 1 c-,g 1 Published in the Valley Daily News Sep-
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the
sum of$ ^r.- Fn
c ‘----\)607N-1,__ .,
rrk 4-6A- S Public Notice
tember 25, 1989 R3747
Subscribed and sworn before me this 4 day of O c t. 1989
_.i. .€17 -
No Public for the State of Washington
residing at Auburn,
King County, Washington
VON 487 Revised 4/89
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Environmental Review Committee
Renton, Washington
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a
Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the
following project under the authority of the Renton
Municipal Code. The following Applicant has completed a
mitigation process:
RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
ECF; SA-055-89
Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a
new one-story, 13 , 607 square foot office building, including
twenty-five (25) under-building parking spaces and thirty-
eight (38) above-ground parking spaces. The project is
located at the southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and
Raymond Avenue S.W.
Further information regarding this action is available in
the Community Development Department, Municipal Building,
Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL.
There is a 14 day appeal period which- will end at 5: 00 PM on
October 9, 1989 . Any appeal of this decision may be made to
the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill
Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state
clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised
and must be accompanied by a, non-refundable $75. 00 filing
fee.
Published: September 25, 1989
•
•
•
ENVIRONMENTALDECLARATION
ECF-055-89, SA-055-89
APPLICATION NO.
•
PROPOSED ACTION PENTA GROUP,
RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW
; .! ONE-STORY, 13,607 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING, INCLUDING TWENTY-
,
= FIVE (25) UNDER-BUILDING PARKING 'SPACES AND THIRTY-EIGHT (38)
ABOVE-GROUND PARKING SPACES.
GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF S.W. GRADY WAY AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W.
•
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED •
,. PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
•`.;
ACTION.
; THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE I E.R.C.l HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION
EIDOES MODES NOT
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
i ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
•
j DWILL KWILL NOT
BE REQUIRED.
d
THE CITY OF RENTON WILL.NOT ACT ON THIS •
PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW.
COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY
AN 1 APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH . THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:00 P.M., OCTOBER 9, 1989
- •
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON •
•
•
PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550.
•
-. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION `
CERTIFICATION ! — I _________
, -
I ,
rlaor ,90,vEka_ , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT . 3 COPIES OF •
THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS
PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON ,SPQ1"e , .1, 19%1 .
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
Notary Public,�}n and for the State of Washington •
residing in •(e /L/ -co aJ , on the 2..761. ,SIGNED : xl JfX��� (ram ./J
day of 56 T) I q 8?
rt.
ENVIRONMENTAL
DECLARAT I 0 N
ECF-055-89, SA-055-89
APPLICATION NO.
PROPOSED ACTION PENTA GROUP
RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW
ONE-STORY, 13 , 607 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING, INCLUDING TWENTY-
FIVE (25) UNDER-BUILDING PARKING SPACES AND THIRTY-EIGHT (38)
ABOVE-GROUND .PARKING SPACES.
GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF S.W. GRADY WAY AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W.
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED
PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE. ( E.R.C..] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION
•
❑DOES } DDES NOT
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
DWILL XLWILL NOT
BE REQUIRED.
THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS
PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW.
COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY
AN APPEAL OF THE ' ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:00 P.M., OCTOBER 9, 1989
' •
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON •
PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
_SA -os5-51.
CITY OF RENTON
CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
.
On the 24 day of Ceo , 19 , I
deposited in the mails of the United States a 'sealed
envelope containing {-4c ,,,, Eiay� ,--tag- IRt 1
,Av- r ram-
documents. This information was sent to:
Name Representing
Dino Po_�\S - 61 cr, a (_:rsujo 1T<--
dasnec. Lti.- (Os10 Dt, o-u.
At due..
try (lur
posSaSsr tvl?
if tiOtk do
' 1ts to �����
W n tit..sc p°�-`
(Signature of Sender) , I .
Subs ribed and sworn to me this ���,, day of (1c 77� %-r_..) ,
19 f .
1,4e,f^r--7..i-e9 c____ __.,,,_,.....,g4
ary Public in and for the
Sta e of Washington residing
at -k'l/`7?TL ' ,
therein.
Project Name: Y-
Project Number: �f1 ' '
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
,being first duly sworn on oath states
that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the
VALLEY DAILY NEWS
• Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition
Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers 4OTICE OF PUBLIC HEAP
are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six RENTON HERING EXAMII ER
gRENTON,, WASHINGTON
months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY
in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT
Coun Washington. The ValleyDailyNews has been approved as a legal HIS REGULAR S ONING IN THE CO ND
ty, g PP g CIL CHAMBERS THE SECOND
newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASH-
King County. INGTON,ON OCTOBER 31, 1989,AT 9:00
A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING
PETITIONS:
The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition PENTA GROUP
, Renton Edition , Auburn Edition , (and not in RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
ECF; SA-055-89
supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Applicant seeks site plan approval for
during the below stated period. The annexed notice a the construction of a new one-story, 13,607
square foot office building, including
twenty-five (25) under-building parking
i L a rou,j) +1'17 34 spaces and thirty-eight (38) above-ground
parking spaces. The property is located at
the Southeast Corner of Southwest Grady
was published on i'� Way and Raymond Avenue Southwest.
Legal descriptions of the file noted
above is on file in the Renton Community
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Development Department.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID
sum of$ - • • • PETITION ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT
AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON OCTOBER
31, 1989, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS
THEIR OPINIONS.
Published in the Valley Daily News Octo-
ber 20, 1989. R3784
Subscribed and sworn before me this - day of • 19 •-
t
N ry Public for the State of Washington
residing at Auburn,
King County, Washington
VDN#87 Revised 4/89
-*METRO .
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598
September 15, 1989
Environmental Review Committee x.. . ;:)
c/o Donald K. Erickson I`r SEP 1 9 1989 ;, 0Zoning Administrator j ytr
Planning Department (a !7 1 t(� [' f, `� I, '4�
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Determination on Nonsignificance
File No: ECF-055-89 Penta Group
Dear Mr. Erickson:
Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no
significant impacts to its wastewater facilities or public
transportation services.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment.
Sincerely,
ALL
GGregory M. Bush, Manager
Environmental Planning Division
GMB:p1g2957
•
Aft
Washington State Duane Berentson
Win
Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation
District 1
15325 S.E.30th Place
Bellevue,Washington 98007
September 13, 1989
TO: Don Erickson
Zoning Administrator
Planning Division
Community Development Departmea
200 Mill Avenue South SEP 1 4 1989
Renton, Wa. 98055 fj
SR 405 M.P. 2. 00 C.S. 1743
Determination of Non-Significance (Mitigated)
Renton Office Building
File SA-55-89
4
FROM: JAMES L. LUTZ, P.E. ,,
Utilities/Developer Services Engineer
Washington State Department of Transportation
District 1
15325 SE 30th Place, MS 113
Bellevue, WA 98007-6597
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this
document. Our response is checked below.
We have reviewed the subject document and have no
comments.
We have already submitted comments on this project. Our
comments are included in our letter dated
from to . We have no
further comments on this project.
XX We have reviewed the subject document and request the
applicant provide further information. We concur with the
mitigation except:
1) The state wishes to review and comment on the Haul
Route Plan if extended beyond the city limits when
presented.
Please contact Dick Aust of my Developer Services Section at
PHONE: 562-4269, SCAN 638-4269,, if you have any questions.
DA:da
cc: WSDOT State Aid - MS 121
NT P
.............................................
:.:.::..::.::•>:.;:.:.;:.:.:>::.>:.;:.:;.;::.>:.::.:
........ : :: ::.:::A:.::.::T.:: .. . ...... .......................�:.:
.................... .. . ........
On the '7+% day of' "'te-P.in - , 19 8 9 , I
deposited in the mails of the United States a .sealed
envelope containing c�hecU t- , Ir{ler a.vv4 4ti—teyvnw tons
• documents. This information was sent to:
Name Representing
r % 1 �.. wscZ41.51.
Grc,v)o rl6 M. 5u1V\ 1`4\e.-tw •
Lyn co_ 81d I. and emu, QwsiGird
Signature of Sender) Sarv.ttist_. t. ��
Subscribed and sworn to me this 7 4Q day of &6iOT-�ezri-_ ..
19q¢� .
Now y Public i and for the
State of Wash'ngton residing
aty�`
therein.
:.;>:.;>:.>::::;::::.;•�::..::...: tk•. w�-c., halt A��, ..i:: ? :::�:•a;.�: ::::::::
..,
•
$% � CITY tiF RENTON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division
August 31, 1989
Washington State
Department of Ecology
Environmental Review Section
Mail Stop PV-I1
Olympia, WA 98504
Re: Environmental Determinations
•
Transmitted herewith are copies of the Environmental Determinations issued and Environmental
Checklists for the projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on August 30,
1989:
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED
RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
ECF; SA-055-89 •
0
Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a new
one-story, 13,607 square foot office building, including twenty-five (25) under-building
parking spaces and thirty-eight (38) above-ground parking spaces. The project is located at the
southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
PARKING GARAGE/PHASE II
ECF; SA-006-89
Applicant seeks site plan approval for Phase II of the Valley Medical Center Parking Garage.
Phase II has 253,445 square feet and will provide an additional 797 parking stalls. The property
is located at 400 South 43rd Street, at the northern portion of the Valley Medical Center
Campus.
The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on September 21, 1989.
Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless
comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination,
there is a required 14 day appeal period.
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550
Facsimile (206) 235-2513 -
Environmental Determinations
August 31, 1989 --
Page._2
•
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED
(RECONSIDERATIONS)
FORREST CRESTE APARTMENTS
ECF; R; SA-093-88
Applicant proposes to rezone the site from G-1, General Use, to R-3, Residential Multi-Family,
and build approximately 200 apartment units on 11.73 acres of property. The property is
located east of Duvall Avenue.and south of Park Terrace, northeast corner of Duvall Avenue
and SE 124th Street (extended). •
BAKKE REZONE
ECF; R; SA; SHPL-107-88
Applications for approvals to allow:1) a rezone from G-1, General Use to R-3, Residential-
Multiple Family, and B-1, Business Use; 2) a four lot subdivision; and 3) a site plan showing a
portion of the site developed with a commercial development with 21,400 square feet and the
remainder of the site developed with a 111 unit multiple family residential complex. The
property is located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 300 feet east of Union
Ave. N.E.
The Environmental Review Committee, on August 30, 1989, reviewed the comments from
various agencies and citizens submitted during the comment period for the Determination of
Non-Significance-Mitigated issued July 3, 1989, for the above referenced project. Based upon
their review)• of the submitted comments and staff input; the Committee reaffirmed their
decision to issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated. As a result of their review,
the Committee did revise some of the conditions as well as add conditions to the Determination.
This Determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than
5:00 p.m. on September 20, 1989. Any appeal of this decision must state clearly in writing why
the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00
filing fee.
If you have questions please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550.
Since
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
DKE:mjp
cc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division
Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro
Department of Wildlife
Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries
Mr. James Lutz, Department of Transportation
•
4o 0 CITY OF RENTON
aka COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division
August 31, 1989
Dino Patis
The Penta Group
1815 Rolling Hills Avenue S.E. •
Renton, WA 98055
Re: Renton Office Building
SE Corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
File #SA-055-89
•
Dear Mr. Patis:
This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their
review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee
on August 30, 1989 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-
Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions:
1. That the applicant be required to: 1) provide adjacent off-site improvements (e.g.
curbs, gutters, streetlighting); 2) provide a latecomer's fee of $1,188.18 for the
construction of the traffic signal at S.W. Grady Way and Powell Avenue S.W.;
and 3) develop a traffic mitigation plan for direct regional improvements OR
make a voluntary contribution of $48,955.81 to the pending Grady Way TBZ.
(Note: In the event that the Grady Way TBZ is approved by the City Council, in
advance of the completion of the appeal period for environmental review for this
project, staff will recommend that the TBZ contribution be converted to a
required fee).
2. That the applicant provide a downstream analysis and storm drainage
management plan to comply with requirements established by the Public Works
Department (e.g. oil/water separators, on-site detention, 10 year storage), in
advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits.
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550
Dino Patis • •
' : Renton Office Building
August 31, 1989
Page 2
3. That the applicant be required to provide insulation to the proposed structure to
limit interior ambient noise levels to 50 dBA to mitigate noise impacts.
4. That the applicant provide a plan for on-site recreational amenities to serve
office complex employees, such as picnic tables and outdoor seating in the
landscaped areas, subject to approval by the Planning Division and the Parks and
Recreation Division in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building
permits.
5. That the applicant be required to provide a construction plan, including: 1) an
erosion control plan; 2) a plan for hours of construction operations; 3) a plan for
off-site hauling hours and hauling routes; 4) a plan for periodic site watering and
wheel-washing of construction trucks; and 5) a $2,000 street-cleaning bond.
These plans should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department in
advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits.
Note: At the time of site plan review, some revisions to design may be required to
further improve the attractiveness and efficiency of this development, including but not
limited to: 1) increased setbacks from the adjacent alley-way or provision of protection
for the south facade of the building; 2) improvements to on-site/off-site pedestrian
linkage; 3) improvements to on-site exterior illumination; 4) a better-defined signage
plan; 5) improvements to the parking plan to address requirements established in the
Parking and Loading Ordinance; 6) improvements to landscaping to address recreational
needs of employees; and 7) traffic-circulation patterns.
Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures
rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day
comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies,
jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. You,
as the applicant, are also invited to comment during this period. The comment period
will end September 21, 1989. Following the end of the comment period, the City will
finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following
the finalization of the Determination, there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal
period.
Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g. the
Public Works Department) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning
specific mitigation elements recommended for this project. This information will assist
you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your
appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so.
In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative
public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary.
Dino Patis •
Renton Office Building
August 31, 1989
Page 3
If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at
235-2550 and ask for Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner and project manager for this
project.
For The Environmental Review Committee
S.
mit
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
DKE/mjp
cc: Fred Steiner
8118 South 122nd
Seattle, Washington
1 '
1
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
(MITIGATED)
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-055-89
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-055-89
PROPONENT: Penta Group
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for
the construction of a new one-story,
13 , 607 square foot office building,
including twenty-five (25) under-
building parking spaces and thirty-
eight (38) above-ground parking
spaces.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and
Raymond Avenue S.W.
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton
Community Development Department
Planning Division
The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that
it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the
environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required
under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation
measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority
of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) .
These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts
identified during the environmental review process.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation
measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this
proposal for fifteen (15) days from September 6, 1989. Any interested
party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00
p.m. , September 21, 1989, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14)
day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS.
Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee
c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator
Planning Division
Community Development Department
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
PUBLICATION DATE: September 6, 1989
DATE OF DECISION: August 30, 1989
SIGNATURES:
� `Vv
K n Nyb ` Ly G ttmann
Com ity D it or Pub is Works Director
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED
MITIGATION MEASURES
PROJECT: RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-055-89
APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-055-89
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval
for the construction of a new one-
story, 13 , 607 square foot office
building, including twenty-five
(25) under-building parking spaces
and thirty-eight (38) above-ground
parking spaces.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way
and Raymond Avenue S.W.
RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee
issued a Determination of Non-
Significance-Mitigated with the
following conditions:
1. That the applicant be required to: 1) provide adjacent off-site
improvements (e.g. curbs, gutters, streetlighting) ; 2) provide a
latecomer's fee of $1, 188. 18 for the construction of the traffic
signal at S.W. Grady Way and Powell Avenue S.W. ; and 3) develop a
traffic mitigation plan for direct regional improvements OR make
a voluntary contribution of $48,955.81 to the pending Grady Way
TBZ.
(Note: In the event that •the Grady Way TBZ is approved by the
City Council, in advance of the completion of the appeal period
for environmental review for this project, staff will recommend
that the TBZ contribution be converted to a required fee) .
•
2 . That the applicant provide a downstream analysis and storm
drainage management plan to comply with requirements established
by the Public Works Department (e.g. oil/water separators, on-
site detention, 10 year storage) , in advance of the issuance of
site preparation/building permits.
3 . That the applicant be required to provide insulation to the
proposed structure to limit interior ambient noise levels to 50
dBA to mitigate noise impacts.
4 . That the applicant provide a plan for on-site recreational
amenities to serve office complex employees, such as picnic
tables and outdoor seating in the landscaped areas, subject to .
approval by the Planning Division and the Parks and Recreation
Division in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building
permits.
.Renton Office Buildin •
Mitigation Measures
Page 2
5. That the applicant be required to provide a construction plan,
including: 1) an erosion control plan; 2) a plan for hours of
construction operations; 3) a plan for off-site hauling hours and
hauling routes; 4) a plan for periodic site watering and wheel-
washing of construction trucks; and 5) a $2, 000 street-cleaning
bond.
These plans should be subject to approval by the Public Works
Department in advance of the issuance of site
preparation/building permits.
Note: At the time of site plan review, some revisions to design may be
required to further improve the attractiveness and efficiency of this
development, including but not limited to: 1) increased setbacks from
the adjacent alley-way or provision of protection for the south facade
of the building; 2) improvements to on-site/off-site pedestrian
linkage; 3) improvements to on-site exterior illumination; 4) a
better-defined signage plan; 5) improvements to the parking plan to
address requirements established in the Parking and Loading Ordinance;
6) improvements to landscaping to address recreational needs of
employees; and 7) traffic circulation patterns.
mmdoc
I
NOTICE OF ENVIRONME •
DETERMINATION
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ENVIROR REVIEW
RENN TON,TON, WASHINGT
The Environmental Review
(ERC) has issued a Determinal
,being first duly sworn on oath states Significance-Mitigated for the fc y pro-
that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the jects under the authority of ;i,e Renton
Municipal Code.
RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
VALLEY DAILY NEWTS ECF; SA-055-89
Applicant seeks :;ie plan approval for
• Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition the construction of a new one-story, 13,607
square foot office building, including
twenty-five (25) under-building packing
Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers spaces and thirty-eight (38) above-ground
are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six parking spaces. The project is located at
the southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way
months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published and Raymond Avenue S.W.
in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
County, Washington. The ValleyDailyNews has been approved as a legal PARKING GARAGE/PHASE II
Y g PP g ECF; SA-006-89
newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Applicant seeks site plan approval for
King County. Phase II of the Valley Medical Center Park-
ing Garage. Phase II has 253,445 square
feet and will provide an additional 797 park-
The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition ing stalls. The property is located at 400
, Renton Edition ,. , Auburn Edition , (and not in South 43rd Street, at the northern portion
supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers of the Valley Medical Center Campus.
pp g Y This decision will be finalized in 15 days.
during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Written comments received after 5:00 p.m.,
September 21, 1989 will not be considered.
A fourteen(14)day appeal period will corn-
)-'.i ;. t x i mi n a t i o n mence following the finalization of DNS-M.
The mitigation measures imposed by the
was published on S E'' - P 3 7 1 City of Renton's Environmental Review
Committee are available at the Planning
Division of the Community Development
Department, Municipal Building Renton,
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550.
sum of$ Published in the Valley Daily News Sep-
tember 6, 1989. R3719
Subscribed and sworn before me this 1= day of -
"1- -
Notary Public for the State of Washington
residing at Auburn,
King County, Washington
VDN 487 Revised 4/89
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of
Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following projects under the
authority of the Renton Municipal Code.
RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
ECF; SA-055-89
Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a new
one-story, 13, 607 square foot office building, including twenty-five
(25) under-building parking spaces and thirty-eight (38) above-ground
parking spaces. The project is located at the southeast corner of
S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
PARKING GARAGE/PHASE II
ECF; SA-006-89
Applicant seeks site plan approval for Phase II of the Valley Medical
Center Parking Garage. Phase II has 253,445 square feet and will
provide an additional 797 parking stalls. The property is located at
400 South 43rd Street, at the northern portion of the Valley Medical
Center Campus.
This decis4jonwill be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received
after 5: 00 p.m. , September 21, 1989 will not be considered. A
fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the
finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of
Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Planning
Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building
Renton, Washington 98055, . Phone: 235-2550.
Published: September 6, 1989
/ _, --,
, .
N OT I C E
•
ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION
APPLICATION NO. ECF-055-89, SA-055-89
APPLICANT RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
i
PENTA GROUP
PROPOSED ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE
• CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW ONE-STORY, 13,607 SQ. FT. OFFICE BUILDING,
INCLUDING 25 UNDER-BUILDING PARKING SPACES AND 38 ABOVE-GROUND
PARKING SPACES.
GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS
. SOUTHEAST CORNER OF S.W. GRADY WAY AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W.
4
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS
OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
(E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION
I I DOES . NI DOES NOT
' HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
I I WILL
KI WILL NOT
BE REQUIRED. •
THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS
1 PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW.
COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY SEPTEMBER 21, 1989
•
a AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY V
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:00 P.M.,
•
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550.
. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
•j WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. .
CERTIFICATION
I , f I«rla Sere\&�_ HEREBY CERTIFY THAT
3 COPIES OF •
�
THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN • -3 CONSPICUOUS
PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON Sept, tI MI
T
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington •
residing in ��A1 j b 4_J , on the //tA O
day of 561� /1 / SIGNED : �cr
,441-r-oo' (<2,-.4eea , ,
l
N oTicE
ENVIRONMENTAL
DEcLARATION
APPLICATION NO. ECF-055-89, SA-055-89
APPLICANT RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
PENTA GROUP
PROPOSED ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW ONE-STORY, 13 , 607 SQ. FT. OFFICE BUILDING,
INCLUDING 25 UNDER-BUILDING PARKING SPACES AND 38 ABOVE-GROUND
PARKING SPACES.
GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF S.W. GRADY WAY AND RAYMOND AVENUE S .W.
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS
OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
(E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION
DOES DOES NOT
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
I I WILL WILL NOT
BE REQUIRED.
THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS
PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW.
COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY SEPTEMBER 21, 1989
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:00 P.M.,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION.
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (;LLW V( P \Y11
DATE CIRCULATED: August 1, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: August 14, 1989
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-055-89'
PROPONENT: Penta Group
PROJECT. TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of new one story, 13 , 607 sq. ft.
office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38 above-
ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
SITE AREA: 33 ,700 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13 , 607 sq. ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
2 . Air °
°
3 . Water °
°
4 . Plants °
5. Animals °
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
7 . Environmental Health °
°
8 . Land & Shoreline Use °
°
9 . Housing °
10. Aesthetics °
11. Light & Glare °
12 . Recreation °
°
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
°
14 . Transportation °
°
15. Public Services °
°
16. Utilities °
COMMENTS:
preck) r TR f c ct►NUIk.co PoOKYOJ
z, U(ot+1Ijutr 5 ii0000 Gt. PR.Outpvo IN PhrItKIbv(, L J( ARQ A S ito1Z,
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this
proposal.
Signature of Dir for or Authorized Representative Date
Rev. 6/8 8
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-055-89
PROPONENT: Penta Group
PROJECT TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of a new one story, 13 , 607 sq.
ft. office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38
above-ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE:
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 14, 1989.
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: bAntArf rtlIN J I Nc DIVISION/
APPROVED X APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
O ,Loco- l 0 14t ior31cAlp PNZ,KIk)c syf L&S 1v NPJ!Now1
CIE cwic►pltvG
Go►np Asa Phit K IAA 571 LLS AILL 't'9 f3 . 8lk 1 t 1 Oc FLAW)
Vwttio5L4R.fs Kr %" 1.4)10E),
PtZCAA04, \\WO j LkLkJ \.1 NV) O Y VOJD lhkV ,luti
FitOt bP
3 71 f w i ► L T IS 1 PhVVh, w►,�,� b TC-O Ts‘,J PP b
caV aipdiQ ARD5 PesS \ S 13 1 1ot AsS Mer cF
1'1 T (A.t'Q-c.1 is tAP 3prbc
PI,TIV Ago,
DATE O- 22 e)F
SIGNATURE. OF DI TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
4, 1 - c
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT o
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET. - ,'1 04
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: SOY ��Vi 1989
DATE CIRCULATED: August 1, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: August 14, 198
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-055-89
PROPONENT: Penta Group
PROJECT, TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of new one story, 13 , 607 sq. ft.
office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38 above-
ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
SITE AREA: 33 ,700 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13, 607 sq. ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
o °
2. Air °
o ° - °
3 . Water °
o ° °
4 . ' Plants °
o °
5. Animals °
o ° °
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
o ° °
7 . Environmental Health °
o ° °
8 . Land & Shoreline Use °
° ° °
9 . Housing °
o ° °
10. Aesthetics °
o °
11. . Light & Glare °
o ° °
12. Recreation °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
o ° .
14 . Transportation °
o ° °
15. Public Services °
o ° °
16. Utilities °
COMMENTS:
Se e CO rVekt -1+5 0 .1 /1'e-K 1 7 S/1eX/'
i
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this
proposal.
76 ku 1e g////8"
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
Rev. 6/88
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-055-89
PROPONENT: Penta Group
PROJECT TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of a new one story, 13 , 607 sq.
ft. office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38
above-ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE:
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
`' PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
7I OTHERS: Stpy v WOACIe
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 14, 1989.
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: S*or'm
/APPROVED
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
we,Tebt elI( 7� GtS G�S k/I I h e-CGt iv J/e, a dolt-GSS<Dl r
01 1 fri us c ©/—
gI, Id. o► )/ Work ' /, ,be Fore 0✓1—S/4e, ye., o(iSG�way e5 rh f v
f e_rii Card+ra) I h `'i/(1 he t-t I� i,�� �G i41 14f�(al
ZJ �O✓'a/� ��oSiv
�oVVv1,5+7 /I41 e-1�19Si°h r
3 On -51 k 5for I4-0-0,- (le 6,1 f i d1-) Ir 1 j
(69 1A t v�titemjs. �/I`1 ' he- / 0 �/( ^s'11F° rLa��-/ (0 7 eac r -( < C C�1�S rq S t l
ere_c (cP� T i s S vW Id be, d r' rl( I D no I n c r-Cat s2 �v� _
�' o r,,I re - -vc/(ad C"n d r 1<i oy- s , 1 1,e
Tor -I - Z oi,nd ICI /g-o,r . dcs19 ,�rnnj Pr f
M -1 ti o 6( s.e a( I o Gran v �� f ivi, s hov I d b-e /tee SS Gl,�d,�a r��J ���
L ao-v n ca/rM Gl n G 17 5.rs A0 r V 1-0 Vh `I Aiw1451 rr-cRoi IN r f ref to r'r2. .
lt ,9 _ dc DATE 8/7I/ 1
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
4 410
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET Clf'
1-7)REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �
DATE CIRCULATED: August 1, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: August 119 9
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-055-89 AUG V"
tde 1989
PROPONENT: Penta Group •
PROJECT, TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of new one story, 13 , 607 sq. ft.
office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38 above-
ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
SITE AREA: 33 ,700 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13 , 607 sq. ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth r/ °
2 . Air
3 . Water °
4 . Plants °
5. Animals °
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
7. Environmental Health °
8 . Land & Shoreline Use °
9 . Housing °
10. Aesthetics °
11. Light & Glare °
12 . Recreation °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
14 . Transportation
15. Public Services °
16. Utilities °
COMMENTS:
SEE ATTACHMENT
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is need d to pro rly assess this
proposal.
Signature of Director or P,uthorized Representative Date/
Rev. 6/88
RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
PENTA GROUP
SA-055-89
Southeast corner of SW Grady Way & Raymond Ave. SW
1. Transportation Benefit Zone fee for SW Grady Way & Rainier corridor
Office General
Trip Rate 23.67
Bldg. Footage 13,607 sq. ft.
Fee Cost per Trip $152
23.67 x 13,607 = 322 trips generated
1,000
152 x 322 = $48,955.81 ) mitigation fee
2. Traffic Signal Latecomer's Fee
SW Grady Way & Powell Ave. SW
Cost per Trip $3.69
Total Trips Generated 322
$3.69 x 322 = $1,188.18 ) latecomer's fee
Holvick de Regt Koering
Fee for Holvick de Regt Koering to be placed in holding account. No current
forwarding address. Company may be in bankruptcy.
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-055-89
PROPONENT: Penta Group
PROJECT TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of a new one story, 13 , 607 sq.
ft. office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38
above-ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE:
�/ ENGINEERING DIVISION
I�TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 14, 1989.
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: %iAP .FZC EN ,)/(8EPI?sJ G
APPROVED /V APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
SEE ATTACHMENT
�' C --- DATE s l r
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHOg ZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
PENTA GROUP
SA-055-89
Southeast corner of SW Grady Way & Raymond Ave. SW
1. Transportation Benefit Zone fee for SW Grady Way & Rainier corridor
Office General
Trip Rate 23.67
Bldg. Footage 13,607 sq. ft.
Fee Cost per Trip $152
23.67 x 13,607 = 322 trips generated
1,000
152 x 322 = $48,955.81 ) mitigation fee
2. Traffic Signal Latecomer's Fee
SW Grady Way & Powell Ave. SW
Cost per Trip $3.69
Total Trips Generated 322
$3.69 x 322 = $1,188.18 ) latecomer's fee
Holvick de Regt Koering °
Fee for Holvick de Regt Koering to be placed in holding account. No current
forwarding address. Company may be in bankruptcy.
•e -
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET chop- 4,441 49:
41
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: l 1•tc `y�,q 4$ ��98�
DATE CIRCULATED: August 1, 1989 1 COMMENTS DUE: August 14, 198 p
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-055-89 rk%47)
PROPONENT: Penta Group
PROJECT TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of new one story, 13 , 607 sq. ft.
office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38 above-
ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
SITE AREA: 33 ,700 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13 , 607 sq. ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
o ° °
2 . Air °
°
3 . Water °
° °
4 . Plants °
5. Animals °
o ° °
6. Energy & Natural Resources ° °
° °
7 . Environmental Health °
° °
8 . Land & Shoreline Use °
9 . Housing ° . °
10. Aesthetics °
° °
11. Light & Glare °
12 . Recreation °
° °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
14 . Transportation °
O ° °
15. Public Services °
° ° °
16. Utilities °
COMMENTS:
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where ditional in ormation is needed to properly assess this
proposal.
�� C_ . ,,, __ f—91 T
Signa e of Directo or Authorized Representative Date
Rev. 6/88
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-055-89
PROPONENT: Penta Group
PROJECT TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of a new one story, 13 , 607 sq.
ft. office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38
above-ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE:
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 14, 1989.
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ` Z- D 6
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS V NOT APPROVED
JO PE-&--/
u►t.D/�
4-
w / / ©12_ D(6
� v
•
a/>+l-I DATE P-9/ `47
SIGNATURE OF DI Z012 R AUTHO I ED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
A�ip
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT op d,,,
' 7‘9,
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET . °4�'
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: al(t Parks and RecA7.um Co'.. �,949
DATE CIRCULATED: August 1, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: August 14, 1989 N®
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-055-89
PROPONENT: Penta Group
PROJECT TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of new one story, 13, 607 sq. ft.
office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38 above-
ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
SITE AREA: 33,700 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13 , 607 sq. ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
o ° °
2 . Air °
O O °
3 . Water 0
°
O ° °
4 . Plants 0
°
o ° °
5. Animals °
o ° O
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
o ° °
7. Environmental Health ° °
o ° °
8 . Land & Shoreline Use °
o ° O
9. Housing °
° ° °
10. Aesthetics ° °
O ° °
11. Light & Glare °
o ° °
12 . Recreation °
° ° °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
14 . Transportation 0
°
o ° °
15. Public Services ° ° 0
o ° O
16. Utilities ° ° 0
00MMENTS: r
A1-19-1;14-e— ..--f7rfrL-- /7 bi.----.4-."-4.4- --- '4"-?""e"-.A--
�t �=elr/r�a �� 1/4 �i �GGc�2 /
c2&....19.1-1.-1.- ~f 4441.004_4_ .
eY/1":1,- c--1177 a-75;_"5-.7.--' tvfer-e../4,,-..‹
. I ".A.-.-7 /Fee'e- e--‘ 14'''-`--- . --4.e.--4A—-
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this
proposal
ignature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
Rev. 6/88
9
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-055-89
PROPONENT: Penta Group
PROJECT TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of a new one story, 13, 607 sq.
ft. office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38
above-ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE:
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
X PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS: I
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 14, 1989.
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
DATE
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
c/3'
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT op4/61 -4..S
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 1�
• "kC '989
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: eArviorvitiehah 4S4/
11 k
DATE CIRCULATED: August 1, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: August 14, 1989
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-055-89
PROPONENT: Penta Group
PROJECT. TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of new one story, 13 , 607 sq. ft.
office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38 above-
ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
1
SITE AREA: 33 ,700 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13, 607 sq. ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ,PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
' IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth 10 )4 °
° °
2 . Air °
° °
3 . Water 1 ° �L °
° °
4 . Plants °
o ° O
5. Animals °
o ° °
6. Energy & Natural Resources 0
°
O ° °
7. Environmental Health °
o °
8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0
o ° °
9. Housing °
o ° °
10. Aesthetics °
o ° °
11. Light & Glare 1 ° °
o ° °
12 . Recreation °
0 ° ._ °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ; °
O ° °
14 . Transportation x °
o ° °
15. Public Services 1 0
°
o ° 0
16. Utilities )C °
COMMENTS:
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this
proposal.
Signature t148?
Si g of Director or Authorized Representative Date
Rev. 6/88
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-055-89
PROPONENT: Penta Group
PROJECT TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of a new one story, 13 , 607 sq.
ft. office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38
above-ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC`/ WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE:
j� ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 14, 1989.
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: geuitaCCtzta&
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED
- 4 61-6641- -174-1
a. ØJtu) 4
I � � r� o'
izoNi
ALA., 6-ri e-CLO 46,
u7 . di(246Tekt-6ga
DATE 610/e?
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET (ci — ..;
,ID
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: frc. yeAton V` L`
DATE CIRCULATED: August 1, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: August 14, 1989
,,,,.id
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-055-89
via
PROPONENT: Penta Group r' 1 1:
1
PROJECT TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of new one story, 13 , 607 sq. ft.
office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38 above-
ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
SITE AREA: 33 ,700 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13, 607 sq. ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth a °
° ° °
2. Air °
o ° °
3 . Water 0 0 °
o ° °
4 . Plants °
o ° O
5. Animals °
o ° °
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
°
7 . Environmental Health a °
o - ° °
8. Land & Shoreline Use °
o a °
9 . Housing ° ° a
°
10. Aesthetics ° 0
°
o ° °
11. Light & Glare °
°
12 . Recreation °
° ° o
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° °
o ° °
14 . Transportation ° °
15. Public Services °
o ° °
16. Utilities ° °
COMMENTS:
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this
proposal.
r 7 /71,
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
Rev. 6/88
„\
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-055-89
PROPONENT: Penta Group
PROJECT TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of a new one story, 13 , 607 sq.
ft. office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38
above-ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE:
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 14, 1989.
•
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: NekiEYTI1
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi-
nances.
A second means of approved access is required. Fire partment access roads/lanes shall be paved
minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes No
Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of I 3, is
required. 3 hydrants with a minimum flow of /, ovo gpm each
i: :equired.
P;:mar hydrant is requiredto be within 1 /57)y yfeet of the structure.
Secondary hydrants are required to be within I ?ay feet of the
structure.
An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes ' No_._.
All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes r! o._
All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes____ No
DATE , 77 /9'*l
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
/2 /71i .7/0X OA//)/
•
REQU I RrI) FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS
1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION
NAME 79 FdciP- /��.C/To>c� 916'/C� /04U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD
ADDRESS S, GrJ• Z ,e6.9. tlV 34.1, 2-^A'/.� /9 -.S?e#IRE MGMT AREA
2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE):
I - II IV III V
FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED
(NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW)
3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A
NUMBER OF STORIES:
TOTAL BUILDING AREA: /3, 0.7'
4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): 3 ,5--4 GPM (B
5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM CC.
IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARDp ADD UP TO 25% OF (B)
6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C):
(IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) ; :?-'7 S GPM (D.
7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: "- / Z,/), in-- GPM (E:
(IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY
AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D).
8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT:
USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF
THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT:
SEPARATION MAR. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ.
0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH 1 ADD o2.5 %
11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST Z ' ADD ? %
•
31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH • / 1 ADD 70 %
61 -100 10% MAX. WEST /D' ADD ,v?s %
101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 95c/6
150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : 7,5
(TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) AD.PJ TMENT: 1 ZS ° GPM (F)
9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: •
(IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM' (G)
.0. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: 3/ D 11-‘,
(IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM)
CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM)
(D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: atirC) GPM (H)
1. SIGNED: �dr •.��" `- `�r '� "'' ---® t ['ATE %. .752
•.
per,
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT c�c'cR$4/7.b/11S/p
O4N
ENVIRONMENTAL..rHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
�' 1989
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ()Amco
ke®
DATE CIRCULATED: August 1, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: August 14, 1989
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-055-89
PROPONENT: Penta Group
PROJECT TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of new one story, 13 , 607 sq. ft.
office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38 above-
ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
SITE AREA: 33 ,700 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13 , 607 sq. ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
o ° °
2 . Air °
o ° °
3 . Water . °
o ° °
4. Plants °
o ° °
5. Animals °
o ° °
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
o ° °
7 . Environmental Health °
o ° °
8. Land & Shoreline Use °
o ° °
9 . Housing °
° ° °
10. Aesthetics °
o ° °
11. Light & Glare °
° °
12 . Recreation °
o ° °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
° °
14 . Transportation ° °° °
15. Public Services ✓ °
o ° °
16. Utilities - ° ° 0
00MMENTS:
IiU4ft' J&LLc S ,fie, 1kvcpv/,AvvQ - w
r Shl euIti sqrvr a..4- HA-L3 544-6 •
1
1
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this
proposa
Signature of Director o Authorized Representative Date
Rev. 6/88
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-055-89
PROPONENT: Penta Group
PROJECT TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of a new one story, 13 , 607 sq.
ft. office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38
above-ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: .
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
V POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 14, 1989.
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: C,e-
APPROVED ✓APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS . NOT APPROVED
StCWL VI/t T(/Vl bwu
pteOLSW(Cutts ik)u(k wot bu Gocu_LL4,, ,a,
4-iimAtk. Lot.
1.,Ctil&hYlie2( SVIA-ur L66.3%.
DATE
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
.,_
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT o 9F16%
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �-�-�1� k®
DATE CIRCULATED: August 1, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: August 14 , 1989
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-055-89
PROPONENT: Penta Group
PROJECT TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of new one story, 13 , 607 sq. ft.
office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38 above-
ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
SITE AREA: 33 , 700 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13 , 607 sq. ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
o ° o
2 . Air °
3 . Water °
0 0 0
4 . Plants °
o ° o
5. Animals °
O ° o
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
e o 0
7. Environmental Health °
O 0 0
8 . Land & Shoreline Use °
O 0 0
9 . Housing °
O 0 0
10. Aesthetics °
0 0 0
11. Light & Glare °
0 0 0
12 . Recreation °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
° 0 0
14 . Transportation °
o o 0
15. Public Services °
16. Utilities
COMMENTS:
E�iu��tE 'PtiscoS ((AL NSiwo 6'F c -r S u-Ciui't C Wa-rR-) PECZ 1ZENT6v 5 iv v,AftAS
cn. cv64b'ER'S ExTEt4Sio') .
- TL-0-16 E lAoFP S`(S'CEM 912 M Ej g.F l.,w l7E11trt•14,-
ee
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this
proposal.
�►�-� 2 3 _ gq
Signature of Director or Author' e Representative Date
Rev. 6/88
„ la
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-055-89
PROPONENT: Penta Group
PROJECT TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of a new one story, 13 , 607 sq.
ft. office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38
above-ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE:
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
,L075 G erz. /(P/sic/ •2S'
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION C•.D•Nid AN'S , ARL•6dnis
AZ2D. ,D'v #/
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU !UTILITY APPROVAL SOBJEC TJ l
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-C`>Tat i; y.Es "LV-lo9„s”0 944. 5:9
POLICE DEPARTMENT LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-S ::71
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT GI2 iE'i,'.. -c � 5 s�/53 .!a0'7r
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN " I
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT(��u.tl i;.v ::y`:��' �5 0/ 3 .�D'#-
�-
BUILDING DIVISION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENTG:".}'-'^_r-L.Jr-'�� N+ L
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT f{ n, - :LL AJ
PLANNING DIVISION F
APPROVED WATER PL4:�i REati'
SHORT RANGE iCPPROv'ED SEWER PIE� e N(t(fZ, itEO it%SIDE etowq
APPROVED FIRE HYDRAI11 i.6;;11;;W:.i
Yes
LONG RANGE DY FIRE RE;T.
yr C':":7 l i9f:LVS".S Nei `Re";uit
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT#SG/CC /wA •J' •01/54 •FT. X .34 91 s4•FT.
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 14, 1989.
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: DTI.L /Ty
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED
1$EcuitE StIVATG U3AT6& "MO koR. G Tf;NS16% Cii'( S wAIR. S`cnE+1 PER.
iteWcONJ %Tr+r1DttROS fort VeviCtbPER'S EXTENS.c 4c
- -t,IUARe 1)509E0 3tiSTPh fort. fill- rt0-
i
gc
' 23 - 2'9
DATE
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ,J g.Jctl_ g9
REV. 6/88
I/
o
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT `G' o,o&,
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEETV� ?�o*
qt
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I c (PI yd� �� �*
DATE CIRCULATED: August 1989 COMMENTS DUE. August 14 ,ust 1, `'' U89
�
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-055-89 L Llj:g I. + "''.` -
PROPONENT: Penta Group '
AUG 1 1989 ;`)
PROJECT. TITLE: Renton Office Building if E r IL'J
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of new one story, 13 , 607 sq. ft.
office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38 above-
ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
SITE AREA: 33 , 700 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13 , 607 sq. ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
o ° 0
2. Air °
o ° °
3 . Water °
o ° °
4 . Plants °
o ° °
5. Animals °
o ° °
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
o ° °
7 . Environmental Health °
o ° 0
8. Land & Shoreline Use °
o ° °
9 . Housing °
o ° °
10. Aesthetics °
o ° °
11. Light & Glare °
12 . Recreation °
° ° °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
° ° °
14 . Transportation °
o ° °
15. Public Services °
o ° °
16. Utilities °
N
COMMENTS: '--77,- • _-__._ ��. _ ,---pZ� 0z` al---iiera-z_-u ,
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this
proposal.
/--- /-- :,-- - (--j''--------------
Sig
nature of Director or Aut - lzed Representative Dat&77
P
Rev. 6/88
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-055-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-055-89( ) . :SA-055-89 # AUG 1 1989 d���t�
�9
PROPONENT: Penta Group [" e ` ' tb!))
PROJECT TITLE: Renton Office Building
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of a new one story, 13 , 607 sq.
ft. office building, including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38
above-ground parking spaces.
LOCATION: Southeast corner of S.W. Grady Way and Raymond Avenue S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE:
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 14, 1989.
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L61,3
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
DATE
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR dR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
OF RED
O
. NoTICE
.p.
'I O,9/fO SEPT EMO�P
OF PENDING
PLAN
SITE APPLICATION
DESCRIPTION :
RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
PENTA GROUP
ECF; SA-055-89
Construction of a new one story, 13,607 sq.ft. office building,
including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38 above-ground
parking spaces.
• GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS:
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF S.W. GRADY WAY AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W.
•
•
PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRE® :
o Environmental Review
o Site Plan Approval
o Building Permit
•
PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED .
BY
THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
.ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS
AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS.
• FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED
. WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
CERTIFICATION
I , .Liit .0 , HEREBY CERTIFY TH T-9410 (3) COPIES OF
THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN Il7►h ( SJ CONSPICUOUS
PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON (9. 4, t.'te
_ 1
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington
residing in = --o^f , on the f t• SIGNED ; 6fAitie (AWL
day of aoc, I gffq
f .
OF R4,
Ci z
' N crTicE
o �
o9.17 ° SEP ct-02'
OF PENDING
G
SITE PLAN APPLICATION
DESCRIPTION :
RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
PENTA GROUP
ECF; SA-055-89
Construction of a new one story, 13, 607 sq. ft. office building,
including 25 under-building parking spaces and 38 above-ground
parking spaces.
• GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS:
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF S.W. GRADY WAY AND RAYMOND AVENUE S.W.
PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED :
o Environmental Review
o Site Plan Approval
o Building Permit
PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED
BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
.ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS
AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
Edward A. A CH�C A545 1 VUE WA 98004
NE SUITE 2 Q
McHu hJr PHONE 206)454-0690 �� O�Lj
ar,4,
(:16
July 28, 1989
Ms. Lenora Blauman
City of Renton
Community Development Department
Planning Division
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: The Penta Group, ECF; SA-055-89
Dear Ms. Blauman:
Attached is our resubmittal revising the use and design of our project
from a retail use to an office use.
Included in our resubmittal are (10) sets ;nf plans and design drawings ,
one copy of reduced plans on PMT paper" and (10)' copies of the new
Environmental Checklist. All the plans and the checklist are dated
7/26/89.
Also attached is a new colorboard showing the proposed colors of the
building.
If you require any additional information to keep our project in your
active file, please call me immediately.
Thank you for your assistance and allowing us to resubmit.
Warm regards,
Edward A. McHugh, Jr. , AIA
EAM/av
Enclosure
ti (2 p 7
July 10, 1989
d.li I .�.... , •
11
Ms. Lenora Blauman JUL 2 1 1980
City of Renton rti,
(( [I U
Community Development Dept. ') tit L� ((g L��
Planning Division
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: The Penta Group Retail Center - Grady Way - SA05589
Dear Ms. Blauman:
Per our phone conversation on Friday, July 7, 1989, The Penta Group
would like to keep the above preliminary application number SA05589
active and will be submitting an amended version that will comply
with the guidelines of Zoning Ordinance Section 4-730.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
CE/AAN9 -611
Dino Patas
•
q�
; "• CITY OF RENTON
nLL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division
June 26, 1989
Dino Pates
1815 Rolling Hills Avenue S.E.
Renton, Washington 98057
RE: The Penta Group Retail Center, Grady Way
(SA 055-89)
Dear Mr. Pates:
This letter is written in response to your request for an
administrative determination as to whether the City would support
a variance permitting the above-referenced approximately 12 ,880
square foot retail center on Grady Way, in an area which is zoned
for manufacturing park use.
The City's Zoning Ordinance (Section 4-730) establishes permitted
uses/development standards for the Manufacturing Park zone in
general and for small lots in particular (4-730 C.3 . ) . That
section does permit modifications to some standards which exist
for full size properties -- such as those for setbacks and
landscaping; however there are no provisions which would allow
for changes in requirements for the minimum size for retail
commercial developments. Retail commercial developments in the
Manufacturing Park zone are required to be a minimum of 25, 000
square feet in size, whether the lot is full size or is less than
35, 000 square feet in size. Whereas Section 4-730 encourages the
consolidation and development of existing small, contiguous lots,
there is no explicit language, nor is there intended to be any
implication, that such lots be developed/utilized in any manner
which does not comply with all other provisions of the zone in
question including those pertaining to permitted uses.
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550
Facsimile (206) 235-2513
The Penta Group Retail Center
June 26, 1989
Page 2
In order to obtain a variance from any ordinance or regulation
for development in the City of Renton, there must be evidence
that the granting of such an exception will not bestow a special
privilege upon the applicant and that a unique hardship exists.
The variance you are requesting to permit an exception to the
minimum retail commercial development size for your property,
would bestow a special privilege for this property unless such
variances were granted to other small lot owners in the MP zone.
The granting of such variances on a broad basis would amount to a
defacto rezone to B-1 (Commercial) for these small parcels.
Finally, allowing a small retail commercial development in the
Manufacturing Park zone is not consistent with the general goals,
objectives and policies for development within this zone.
Whereas Council was willing to reorganize the hardship that major
building setbacks had on small lots, it did not reorganize any
use hardships. Therefore, there is no way that we can support
your variance request to allow industrially related commercial
uses in developments of less than 25, 000 square feet. The
existing small lot setback standards already allow one a smaller
sized site (to accommodate such a commercial development) than
would be allowed elsewhere in the M-P Zone where lots are regular
sized.
This administrative determination that the small lot provisions
of Section 4-730C.3 are not intended to apply to uses in the MP
Zone may be appealed. A written appeal of this decision must be
filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner within fourteen
(14) days of this decision, or before 5: 00 p.m. on July 10, 1989.
The appeal shall be accompanied by a $75. 00 fee.
If you have other questions, please contact me, or Lenora
Blauman, project manager, at 235-2550.
f,. 'n rely, ia._____,.i
) *
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
DKE/lb:mjp
June 19, 1989
C`iuirH
MY OF RE\ ;^N
Mr. Donald K. Erickson
Zoning Administration I0! J U N 2 0 1989
City of Renton
Community Development Department
Planning Division
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: Preliminary site plan for retail center on Grady Way,
Submitted by: The Penta Group, 1815 Rolling Hills Ave. S.E. ,
Renton, Washington 98057
Dear Mr. Erickson:
The purpose of this letter is to request that you and your committee members
consider allowing The Penta Group a variance in reference to the minimum
square footage allowed for a retail center in the Earlington-Grady Way area.
The preliminary site plan submitted by The Penta Group is for a 12,880 sq.
ft. retail center. As of this writing, the following steps have been per-
formed by The Penta Group:
1. Soils test and analysis
2. Survey
3. Retained Mr. Edward A. McHugh to complete a preliminary site plan, in-
cluding:
A. Perimeter landscaping
B. Interior landscaping
C. Greenbelt landscaping
D. Floor plan
E. Basement parking plan
F. Preliminary elevations
G. Preliminary grading and utilities plan
Previous to The Penta Group retaining Mr. McHugh, two of The Penta Group
members, Mr. Tom McFarlan and Mr. Fred Steiner, met with Mr. Jim Hansen
in regard to building a retail center on The Penta Group's property which
is currently zoned MP. Mr. Hensen referred to Section 4-730, B 1 (f) which
allows retail trade subject to the provisions of Section 4-730, C (2) .
Reviewing Section 4-730, C (2) , C (1) , it states that "a retail or service
use shall not stand alone, unless such use has a floor area greater than
25,000 sq. ft." Mr. Hansen then referred Steiner and McFarlan to Section
4-730, C (3) , which has language concerning pre-existing lots and contiguous
lots held in the same ownership, and that those lots must be developed to
the greatest extent possible.
~ � III III
Mr. Donald K. Erickson
City of Renton
June 19, 1989
Page #2
We therefore have tried to develop a property that would maximize the use
of The Penta Group's property, and also be similar to those projects in
the same area.
We appreciate you and your committee's reconsideration to allow The Penta
Group to develop a 12,880 sq. ft. retail center on Grady Way.
:120
Sincerely,
e
Dino Patas
1815 Rolling Hills Ave. S. E.
Renton, Washington 98057
Telephone: 226-4200
• ' CITY OF RENTON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division
June 9, 1989
Dino Patis
The Penta Group
1815 Rolling Hills Avenue S.E.
Renton, WA 98055
RE: The Penta Group Retail/Office Complex
S.W. Grady Way at Raymond Avenue
ECF; SA-055-89
Dear Mr. Patis:
City staff has completed a preliminary review of the above-referenced project and has
requested additional information and/or clarification of existing materials in order to
proceed further with the evaluation process.
Your application materials indicate that you plan to develop a retail/office facility of
approximately 12,800 square feet. Our Zoning Ordinance, Section 4-730, establishes
some restrictions on retail developments in the Manufacturing Park zone. Retail
complexes are required to be a minimum of 25,000 square feet (4-730.C.1.c.1).
Additionally, retail uses in the Manufacturing Park zone are required to be "supportive
of industrial areas" (4-730 A) such as, perhaps, a print shop or an industrial equipment
sales enterprise. Your application materials do not define the retail uses which will be
in place on the site.
In order to proceed with evaluation of your application for a retail complex on this site,
staff will need revised site plans which depict a complex of a minimum of 25,000 square
feet in size and a narrative statement which describes planned retail and service uses that
will be supportive of the industrial area which we can then use to assess the
appropriateness of the proposed development.
Alternatively, you may wish to revise your plans to provide offices, and/or
personal/professional services in your proposed development. Offices and services are
principally permitted uses in the Manufacturing Park zone and, thus, subject only to
customary development requirements.
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550
Dino Patis
Penta Group Retail/Office Complex
June 9, 1989
Page 2
In order to proceed with our evaluation of your project in a timely manner, we would
like to receive the above-requested materials, either revised site plans or revised use
plans, by no later than June 26, 1989.
If you have questions or need additional information, please contact Lenora Blauman,
project manager, at 235-2550.
Sincerely,(DJ (-
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
cc: Ed McHugh
545 108th N.E. #2
Bellevue, Washington 98004
Attachment: Section 4-730 - Zoning Ordinance
•
- ...a .
J r 1 Y Q� (i.�r�� Y OFRE `I r�,) y, •
FILE NO(S): i -o55-&
' 6. . 'BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ►_ i'
N� hil.
ASTER APPLICATION .
NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this Is a comprehensive application, form, only those
• items related to your Specific type of application(s) are to be completed.
(Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
APPLICANT 1 1 TYPE OF APPLICATION.
NAME .
FEES
The Penta. Group
ADDRESS 0 REZONE*(FROM TO
1815 Rolling Hills Ave. S.E. 0 SPECIAL PERMIT* -�_)
_
CITY Renton WA ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT*
98055 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT*
TELEPHONE 17 `1 SITE PLAN APPROVAL i3OO,cO
'' (206) 226-4200 (� SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL
No. of Cubic Yards:
CONTACT PERSON 0 VARIANCE*
From Section:
NAME * Justification Required
Dino Patin
ADDRESS ' SUBDIVISIONS:
1815 Rolling Hills Ave. S.E. .
0 SHORT PLAT
CITY ZIP 0 TENTATIVE PLAT
Renton WA 98055 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT
•
TELEPHONE .
0 FINAL PLAT
(206) 226-4200 (D WAIVER
(Justification Required)
OWNER NO. OF LOTS:
NAME 1 PLAT NAME:
The Penta Group I
•
ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT:
1815 Rolling Hills Ave. S.E.
CITY 0 PRELIMINARY
Renton • ' WA 98055 ZIP 0 FINAL •
TELEPHONE P.U.D. NAME:
. (206) 226-4200 0 Residential
0 Industrial
0 Commercial El Mixed
LOCATION
se
MOBILE HOME PARKS:
PROPERtV ADDRESS
• corner of SW Grady Way & Raymond Ave SW 0 TENTATIVE
EXISTING 'USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMIIARY
Vacant MP 0 FINAL.
PROPOSED USE PARK NAME:
Retail Office
NUMBER OF SPACES:
E] ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 110.00 •
SQ. FT. ACRES. Si ,
AREA: saw _ 33,1 ..•8-— TOTAL FEES 1 10.0)
STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING
DATE STAM 1rmiNQ DiMiSiOH� APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: ` 77a"f 4-
•
• CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE:
. :IT/ MAY 2 2 1989 rin
Accepted
0 Incomplete' Notification Sent On By:
r� n nq 'i- .:
(Initials)
• DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY:
6- 1 f APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE:
0 Accepted
• 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On - - By: .
ROUTED TO: (Initials)
Building tl Design Eng. On Fire •
Parks
Police 134 Policy Dev. d Traffic Eng. I A Utilities •� '
r' _t
•
Legal description of property (if more space Is required, attach a separate sheet)..
Lots 6 through 16, inclusive, Block 28, C.D. Hillman's Earlington
Gardends addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1; According
to the. Plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, Page 74, in King
County, Washington.
w ;
•
•
AFFIDAVIT
4 Dino Patis Ibeing Y sworn,dui declare that I am
authorized representative to act for the property owner, [Downer of the property Involved
in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the
information herewith submitted are In all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS
// DAY . OF inciaj q
19 % I .
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF
WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT .
Renton
(Name oftflotary Public) (Signature of Owner)
20921 S.E. 206th St. , Renton WA 98058 1815 Rolling Hills Ave. S.E.
(Address) (Address)
Renton, WA 98055
(City) (State) (Zip)
(206) 226-4200
(Telephone) .
Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete
application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in
the "Application Procedure." .
•
•
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOTS 6 THROUGH 16, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 28, C.D. HUMAN'S- EARLINGTON GARDENS
. ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, DIVISION NUMBER 1 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON.
•
p4-NN1NG DIViS10N
IIYOFRENTO .
9 \-6), ..',,.
` i • MAY 2 2 . - ' .
.
.
•
:.::.r'.pF.c*ciiw.-3::w.x-.'-::;:':-.-,:..;.._:,.._>:=.. --- - ';R:`�:ALL=:;:.- - -- - _ - •_ _
-
-
. - ..:.......::.. - .,: .., cam-.._ .."_... -.,.'.3.f,. ._- ..__...._-..- ._ ,,. ..._— .. .,... .. .._ .. - - -
QF I
-v ECF: I 065 -fj/
4c,,
v41 _._.- - 0 1_U:
z City of Renton
o
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
0 .1•
E0sE1314".P
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all
governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making
decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals
with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose
of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts
from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)
and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your
proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the
environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS.
Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best
description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your
knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own
observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know
the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does
not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and
landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the
governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do
them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional
information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The
agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide
additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impacts.
Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly)
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be
answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR
NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs),
the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site"
should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: RENTON OFFICE BUILDING
2. Name of applicant: PENTA GROUP
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact.person:
FRED STEINER
8118 SOUTH 122ND
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON
4. Date checklist prepared: 7./26/89
S. Agency requesting checklist: CITY OF RENTON
6. Proposed timingor schedule (includingphasing, if applicable):. c�.�OFRE tots
P ON
GRAND OPENING SPRING 1990
JUL 2 81989
1 ;
7. • • Do you have any plar 3r future additions, expansions. c, irther activity related
to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain.
NO •
B. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
NONE KNOWN
•
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
NO
10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,
if known.
NONE KNOWN
11. Give brief. complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and
the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist
that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to
repeat those answers on this page.
NEW OFFICE- BUILDING; APPROXIMAT,-ELY =13,.000_SQU.ARE WITH -
R'ELATED"PARKI NG AND LA'NDSCAP-iNG _=
AREA OF SITE APPROXIMATELY 33,700 SF:: ( .77 ACRES)_
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and
section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,
site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you
should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate
maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
PROJECT LOCATED AT SOUTH EAST CORNER OF INTERSECTION OF
S.W. GRADY WAY AND RAYMOND.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 6 THROUGH 16 BLOCK 28, C. D. HILLMANS
EARLINGTON GARDENS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, DIVISON
NUMBER 1 RECORDED IN VOLUME 17 OF PLATS PAGE 74 KING COUNTY,
WASH I NGTON.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep
slopes, mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
EIGHT PERCENT (8%)
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
LOOSE SAND, SOFT COMPRESSIBLE SILT OVERLYING
DENSE SAND AND GRAVEL.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
NO
- 2 -
e. Describe tl... purpose, type, and approximate ntities of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
APPROXIMATELY 3000 TO 4000 CY FILL FROM NEARBY EXCAVATIONS.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe.
NO
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces
after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
NINETY PERCENT (900)
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the
earth, if any:
COLLECT SURFACE RUNOFF AND ROOF WATER AND CONDUCT
TO STORM DETENTION SYSTEM.
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,
dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and
when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give
approximate quantities if known.
NORMAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND .OFFICE; _
USE TRAFFIC. QUANTITIES UNKNOWN.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emission?
NO
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,
if any:
NONE
3. WATER
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state
what stream or river it flows into.
NONE KNOWN
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)
the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
NO
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site
that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
NONE
- 3 -
•
4) Will the prop, require surface water withdrav or diversions? Give
general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known.
NO
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on
the site plan.
NO
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
discharge.
NO
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground
water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if
known.
NO
•
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.).
Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the
number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or
humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
NONE
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
STORM WATER RUNOFF TO BE COLLECTED, STORED AND
RUN THROUGH A TYPE II CATCH BASIN WITH FLOW
RESTRICTOR CONNECTED TO EXISTING CITY STORM SEWER.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally
describe.
NO
- 4 -
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surfaca. ground, and runoff water
impacts, if any:
LANDSCAPING AREAS AND STORM WATER COLLECTION AND
DETENTIONS SYSTEM.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
Xi deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
o evergreen tree: fir. cedar, pine, other
o Shrubs
o grass
o crop or grain
o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other
o other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
ALL EXISTING VEGETATION WILL BE REMOVED AND
REPLACED WITH NEW.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
NONE KNOWN.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve
or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
PERIMETER LANDSCAPING, PARKING AREA LANDSCAPING,
AND GREENBELT LANDSCAPING PROPOSED.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site
or are known to be on or near the site:
Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other
Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other
Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
NONE KNOWN
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
NO
- 5 -
•
d. Proposed moaures to preserve or enhance wildli.._,if any:
NONE
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be
used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it
will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
ELECTRIC - LIGHTING/AIR CONDITIONING
GAS - HEATING/COOKING/HOT WATER
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe.
NO
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List: other proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any:
PROJECT TO COMPLY WITH STATE/LOCAL ENERGY
CODES/ORDINANCES.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
NO
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
NONE
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental 'health hazards, if
any:
NONE
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for
example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
NONE
- 6 -
2) What types a,,� levals of noise would be created or associated with the
project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come
from the site.
• NORMAL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION
7AM - 4PM
NORMAL - OFFICE PARKING,ACTIVITY:T 8 AM - 10 PM
PROJECT IS LOCATED ON VERY BUSY CITY ARTERIAL ROAD
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
NONE
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
CURRENT SITE IS VACANT
SURROUNDING USES ARE MANUFACTURING/OFFICE USES
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
NO '
c. Describe any structures on the site.
NONE
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
NO
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
M-P MANUFACTURING PARK (SMALL LOT)
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
MANUFACTURING/RETAIL
g. If.applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of
the site?
NOT KNOWN
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"
area? If so, specify.
NO
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
25 !TWENTY FIVE)
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
NONE
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
NONE NECESSARY
- 7 -
' 1. Proposed r::__,sures to ensure the proposal is c: „oatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
CITY REVIEWS/APPROVALS TO BE OBTAINED
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate
whether high. middle, or low-income housing.
NONE
b.. Approximately how many units, if any. would be eliminated? Indicate
whether high. middle, or low-income housing.
NONE
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
NONE NEEDED
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including
antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed.
35', CEMENT PLASTER (STUCCO)
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
NONE
•
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
LOW PROFILE BUILDING WITH MODULATION AND LANDSCAPING,
SOME PARKING UNDER BUILDING TO MITIGATE ON GRADE
PARKING AREA REQUIREMENTS.
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day
would it mainly occur?
NONE, CONTROLLED BY DESIGN ,
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or
interfere with views?
NO
1
c.. What existing off-site sources of,light or glare may affect your proposal?
NONE
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
DESIGN CONTROLS
- 8 -
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
NONE KNOWN
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
NO
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
NONE
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state,
or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
NONE KNOWN
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, .
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
NONE
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
NONE NECESSARY
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
SW GRADY WAY - MAIN CITY ARTERIAL
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately
distance to the nearest transit stop?
YES
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many •"'
would the project eliminate?
63 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED - NON ELIMINATED
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
NONE - IMPROVEMENTS ALREADY EXIST
•
- 9 -
e. Will the proje,.,. use (or occur in the immediate city of) water, rail, or
air transportation? If so, generally describe.
NO
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
NOT KNOWN - NO TRAFFIC STUDY
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
NONE •
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for
example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)?
If so, generally describe.
NO
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,
if any.
BUILDING WILL BE TOTALLY FIRE SPRINKLERED
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas,
water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility
providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or
in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
ELECTRICITY - PUGET POWER
NATURAL GAS - WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS
REFUSE SERVICE - RAINIER DISPOSAL
TELEPHONE - AT&T SANITARY SEWER: CITY OF RENTON
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is
true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any
declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist
should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on
my part.
Proponent:
Name Printed: EDWARD A. McHUGH, JR.
ARCHITECT FOR PROJECT
- 10 -
#17F 11-8-84
' e '
£J: SUPPLEMENTAL Sl FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and
programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in
conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types
of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater
intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond
briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;
production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of
noise?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
3.. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas
or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such
as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species
habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
- 11 -
5. . How would the F" )sal be likely to affect land shoreline use, including
whether it would dulow or encourage land or shore...... uses incompatible with
existing plans?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
•
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal
laws or requirements for the protection of the environment.
SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is
true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any
declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist
should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on
my part.
Proponent:
Name Printed:
- 12 -
•
Renton Retail Edvvard A..
ARoiHT ra467,1512-iva
5 / 1 6 / 89
.46
SLOPED AWNING
ACCENT STRIPE
AWNING FIELD
oarACCENT STRIPE
PLANNING R N SI
BUILDING FACADE, n
MAY 2
X-53 PURE IVORY 15
(BASE 100)
40... . . _
•
• 830709 .
Chicago Title -
t TNIs SPACE PROVIDED FOR RECORDERS USE:
+, Insurance Company 'cr.- o=
•i • Z 2=y-
• F 7r
F1 EO FOR RECORD AT REQUEST Of Ic .-r ._ .
t07 i5N.
c =-.z
r ajY
� V
$ Q WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO _
•
r • , Name,• _DROKER G SULMAN, Attys 83/10/12 k0411 D
- F V RECD F 3.00 t
' ••• 927 Securities Building• . ___ CPSHEL ** 3.00
Seattle WA. 98101 -
a .0
Statutory Warranty Dead
-.THE GRANTOR ---JESSIE•MACRIS,--as her-separate estate--- `---"--------•-_.-..._.—._—
,
•
•
•
for andincausiderstionof TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION --_ _
in hand paid,conveys and warrants to THE PENTA GROUP, a Washington Limited Partnership _----
1.1
the following described real estate,situated in the County of KING ,State of Washington: _- --
i Lots 6 through .16, inclusive, Block 28, C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens .
Addition to the City of 'Seattle, Division No. 1, according to the plat
thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, in King `County, -- -
• Washington. --
•
•
"' STFTf OF tt4;,`Conveyance 74 KINGCOU
�tOn S —Tax—_ EXCISE TAX PAID
. - �'1 ocTtru �; :F = 23.00 _ OCT 72. 1.
EEVT. F P.D.lilt? � 3 r=-
t •
- _ _ EO'7452'5
HOB t::::,%. _
.. smote.Wesnioln..•r. 19101 .• �:�. _
ce t1 troponw park _'i 7 sTA E t00 .8 Conveyance •
•
-llto oz=ve way 0CTIrr3 '.!I'l''. 2 12. 5 0 =
scat*,Nae a' DEPT.OF
REVENUE P.O.11267 p
Dated S ep.t•ember.-..14 th, .19....8.3..
•• J B �F 41421 s__14..(1'C x�J._ ^ ...-1'Q.+Q llr�QF(k4d. ..___.._____�._._._____ .._ ,
By: eor Macris, her Attorney in Fact
VI AY 2
2 1' `, 1
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
County of KING,,// Ni E c L v, .
On this //1' day of September , 19 83,before me personally appeared j
GEORGE MACRIS to me known to be the individual who executed the • i
foregoing instrument as Attorney in Fact for JESSIE MACRIS r.••' r<,.,a, •-�
f'� and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and dt!<d;Ai:AttorTeyil�I'fa4 •
8 , for said principal for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that the Powe�D!Attorney t cpzhg
_ . %_ the execution of this instrument has not been revoked and that said principal is now living antis not insane. . `
•. 2 GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day and year written.
• . g e si • —�
Notary Public is and for the State of Was , ton,
B ' residing at lbei-YEpIT-1107.r-l(t
3 a
.e■no..r.so.•. _._ .
OCT F' 9zot, FILED .BY CTI
121983 . . .
_ _. _. . . ____ . ii• . ..._ .
0
. i r
(I 83 9
STEWART TITLE COMPANY TIIISSPACE PROVIDED FOR RECORDI:R•SUSE ,
of Washington, Inc.
. OC •
•
.! FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF '4 ,iE,
Pt
t_ al 0r,_7
a rr =O. '
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO -; d cow
f
rN _ - i..
_ Name DROKFR F. SUI.MAN, Attys.
• + 83/10/12 N041z►--D
t ® Address 427 Securities Bui ding RECD F 6.00 t::
CRSHSL ****L.�O
!
SR City.State,Zip Seattle. WA. 98101 22 t
J •
f
Deed of Trust '
a I (For L'sr'in the State vi Washington Only)
• THIS DEED OF TRUST,made this 14th day of September , 19 R'L between -
THE PENTA GROUP, a Washington-Limited Partnership ,GRANTOR, r.
whoseaddressis 321 Rainier Avenue South. Seattle. WA. 48144 --
STEWART TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON,INC.,a corporation,TRUSTEE,whose address b W1 Second - -
Avenue,Seattle,WA 98104
1 JESSIE MACRIS. as her separate estate , BENEFICIARY, _
whose address is 8504 South 113th. Seattle. WA. 98178 = -
WITNF-SSETH: Grantor hereby bargains, sells and conveys to Trustee in Trust, with power of sale, the
, following described real property in KING • County, Washington:
C Lots 6 through 16, inclusive, Block 28, C.D. Hillman's Earlington -
. Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according
to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, in
King County, Washington. .
Additional terms and provisions of this Deed of' Trust according to
_ the attached rider marked Exhibit "A" which is by this reference -
made a part hereof.
1 The note this Deed of Trust secures is due and payable in full, on
or before September 15, 1993,
•
•
•
which real property is not used principally for agricultural or farming purposes,together with all the tenements.hereditaments,
. • '_` and appurtenances now or hereafter thereunto belonging or in any wise appertaining,and the rents,issues and profits thereof.
s
�'
This deed is for the purpose of securing performance of each agreement of grantor herein contained, and
8 (y / ODths--- Dollars(S200,000.00)
yl payment of the sum of TWO HUNDRED THOIISANn AND Nn 1
1r with interest,in accordance with the terms of a promissory note of even date herewith,payable to Beneficiary or order,and
e made by Grantor,and all renewals,modifications and extensions thereof,and also such further sums as may be advanced or
- v loaned by Beneficiary to Grantor,or any of their successors or assigns,together with interest thereon at such rate as shall be
:I
I t agreed upon. s
• `(.) To protect the security of this Deed of Trust,Grantor covenants and agrees:
• u I.To keep the property in good condition and repair: to permit no waste thereof;to complete any building,structure or
S improvement being built nr about to be built thereon:to restore promptly any building,structure or improvement thereon
which may he damaged or destroyed:and to comply with all laws.ordinances.•regulations,covenants,conditions and restric-
s dolts affecting the properly.
•
F j .
OCT.121983 i FILED BY CTI , . • -
f ,,
t 2.To pay before delinquent all lawful taxes and anessmenu upon the property:to keep the property free and clear of all other charges,bens or
' encumbrances impairing the security of this Deed of Trust. -
J.To keep all buildings now or hereafter erected on the property described herein continuously insured against loss by fire or other hasards in an amount
I not less than the total debt secured by this Deed of Trust.MI policies shall be held by the Beneficiary,and be in such companies as the Beneficiary may
• approve and have loss payable first to the Beneficiary,as its interest may appear,and then to the Grantor.The amount collected under any insurance policy
may be applied upon any indebtedness hereby secured in such order as the Beneficiary shall determine.Such application by the Beneficiary shall not cause
discontinuance of any proceedings to foreclose this Deed of Trust.In the event of foreclosure.all rights of the Grantor in insurance policies then in force
shall pass to the purchaser at the foreclosure sale. •
eq 4.To defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security hereof or the rights or powers of Beneficiary or Trustee,and to pay all costs and
, WIexpenses,including cost of title search and atorney's fees in a reasonable amount,in any such action or proceeding,and in any suit brought by Beneficiary
to foreclose this Deed of Trust.
S.To pay all costa,fees and expenses in connection with this Deed of Trust.including the expenses of the Trustee incurred in enforcing the obliptio2
l secured hereby and Trustee's and atmrney's fees actually incurred,es provided by statute. �:•
r 6.Should Grantor fail to pay when'due any taxes,assessments.insurance premiums.Lens.encumbrances or other charges against the property
1 , ' �a"1� hereinabove described,Beneficiary may pay the lime,and the amount so paid,with interest at the rate set forth in the note secured hereby.shall be added
t s to and become a part of the debt secured in this Deed of Trust. S„
uV a— I
IT IS MUTALLY AGREED THAT:
I.In the event any portion of the property is taken or damaged in an eminent domain proceeding,the entire amount of the award or such portion as may-
{ be necessary to fully satisfy the obligation secured hereby,shall be paid to Beneficiary to be applied to said obligation. -
• -f .2.By accepting payment of any sum secured hereby after its Jut date.Betseficiary does not waive its right to require prompt payment when due of all other '
•sums so secured or to declare default for failure to so pay.
•
• J.The Trustee shall reconvey all or any pan of the property covered by this Deed of Trust to the person entitled thereto on written request of the Grantor
' and the Beneficiary,or upon satisfaction of the obligation secured and written request for reconveyanee made by the Beneficiary or the person entitled
_ _ thereto.
4.Upon default by Grantor in the payment of any indebtedness secured hereby or in the performance of any agreement contained herein,all sums
secured hereby shall immediately become due and payable at the option of the Beneficiary In such event and upon written request of Beneficiary.Trustee
• shall sell the trust property.in accordance with the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washington,at public auction to the highest bidder.Any person
• except Trustee may bid at Trustee's sale.Trustee shall apply the proceeds of the sale as follows.III to the expense of the sale,including a reasonable __
Trustee's fee and auorney's fee:121 to the obligation secured by this Deed of Trust:Ill the surplus.if any.shall be distributed to the persons entitled
thereto.
S.Trustee shall deliver to the purchaser at the sale its deed,without warranty,which shall convey to the purchaser the interest in the property which Gran. - --
tor had or had the power to convey al the time of his execution of this Deed of Trust,and such as he may have acquired thereafter.Trustee's deed shall -_-
recite the facts showing that the sale was conducted in compliance with all the requirements of law and of this Deed of Trust.which recital shall be prima
fade evidence of such compliance and conclusive evidence thereof in favor of Mora fide purchaser and encumhrancers for value.
6.The power aside conferred by this Deed of Trust and by the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washington is not an exclusive remedy:Beneficiary may
cause this Deed of Trust to be foreclosed as a mortgage
7.In the event of the death,incapacity,disandity or resgn ition of Trustee.Beneficiary may appoint in writing a successor trustee,and upon the recording _-
. of such appointment in the mortgage records of the county in which this Deed of Trust is recorded,the successor trustee shall be vested with all powers of
the original trustee.The trustee is not obligated to notify any party hereto of pending sale under any other Deed of Trust or of any action nr proceeding in
• which Grantor.Trustee or Beneficiary shall he a party unless such action or proceeding is brought by the Trustee.
S.This Deed of Trust applies in inures to the benefit of.and is binding not only on the parties hereto,hut on their heirs,devisees.legatees,administrators.
executors and assigns.The term Beneficiary shall mean the holder and owner of the note secured hereby,whether or not named as Beneficiary herein.
. I
THE PENTA GROUP, a Washington Limited
Partnership
t : ��By 1no as, General Partner
STATE OF WASHINGTON
• ss
"art.
CO_This Oto Certify that on the ' f� day of r ,I9_f3___before me,
• the undersigned a Notary Public,personally appeared n-rma PATAS and
,to me known to be the general partner(s)of
THE PENTA GROUP. a Wash,(Goole ld4(limiled)partnership and acknowledged the said instrument to be the
•
free and voluntary act and deed of said general partner(s)for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated
' that he was/sYMltauthorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of said partnership.
Witness my hand a official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written.te
•Sre`' 7
,...
.. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,
air residing at BA 7 levucs
• ; S I.
f'"' �" ' SAFECO TITLE Insurance Company—ACKNOWLEDGMENT
-. Of,I:A. General and limited Partnership.(General Partner—Natural Person)
M•� iiirlll,
TL-a 5/79
•
.4 REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEYANCE
•t. ran not record. fit hi'usr/onh•,lido non•bus h t's,pad.
•
• : TO: TRUSTEE.
• The undersigned is the legal owner and holder of the note and all other indebtedness secured by the within Deed of Trust Said note.together with all
i other indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust.has been fully paid and satisfied,and you are hereby requested and directed,on payment to you of any
1 sums owing to you under the terms of said Deed of Trust,to cancel said note above mentioned,and all other evidences of indebtedness secured by said
Deed of Trust delivered to you herewith,together with the said Deed of Trust,and in reconvey,without warranty,to the parties designated by the.erms
of said Decd of Trust,all the estate now held by you thereunder.
11ite5
OCT H. •FILED BY CTI. ` -- .
• 12 f983 I _ ._
.
•
.a_' .4....... ...a w.....: ... .ti. a i_:S ..•. .:3..�... :'.1>.L L.:a:t.Li:::,_teaS.d... .7.C-Rd:..7,1 \:5,:;.:.. - .r. ,. , .
830709
.
•
EXHIBIT "A"
f Grantor and Beneficiary agree as follows:
• ,
• . N 1. The parties agree that adequate substitute security for this
' J 94 Deed of Trust may be provided by Grantor funding an annuity
which pays to Beneficiary the payments as set forth in the
a note this Deed of Trust secures, which note is referred to
hereafter as "Note". Said annuity shall be a single premium
r4 annuity paid for in full by Grantor.
2. Grantor agrees to deliver to Beneficiary any annuity proposal --
which Grantor may deem to be satisfactory. Grantor shall not
pay the premium or sign the annuity proposal application
• without the prior written consent of Beneficiary, which
consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. The parties
agree that the Annuity "Owner" shall be The Penta Group, and
i that the "Annuitant" shall be Jessie Macris. The "Annuity
' Beneficiary" shall be designated by the Annuitant at any time
after the annuity has been purchased.
Beneficiary shall have the right to approve the insurance _
company that issues the annuity.
' 3. Upon approval by Beneficiary of the annuity proposal, Grantor
• shall proceed to purchase the annuity.
•
4. Beneficiary agrees to deliver to Droker S Sulman, 927
• Securities Building, Seattle, WA. 98101, hereafter referred
to as "Escrow Agent", a fully executed "Request for Full
Reconveyance" of this Deed of Trust. Beneficiary shall •
deliver said document to escrow agent simultaneously with the
delivery by Grantor of this Deed of Trust to escrow agent.
1 •
5. At such time as the annuity has been issued, the parties
• agree to jointly notify escrow agent in writing, and instruct
escrow agent to deliver the Request for Full Reconveyance to __
th• e Trustee for Reconveyance.
•
• 6. The Note this Deed of Trust secures shall remain in full
force and effect. The security for said Note shall have been
transferred from this Deed of Trust to the annuity.
•
7. As used in this Exhibit "A", "Beneficiary" refers to
'I
Beneficiary of this Deed of Trust and "Annuity Beneficiry"
refers to beneficiary of the annuity.
,
!OCT 12 ?4A� i FILED BY cm j
�•. WHOLESALE LUMBER WAREHOUSE
GASCOIGNE F.O.BOX9756
6th AVE.W.•SEATTLE, 981
`UMBER C O■ 3528(206)282-4314/FAX(206)22 WA 78 09
DATE
_.I,�/►ICI
41 .0tiveiV.A "14.
aOprjV
-virtg
0 _ -)z_ -G4cl E.
(7- .
. .„... 3 3 y o Y-o --z/7•DS--• - s ix t ( 0,i c;"‘ ':- -- ''':7-1:'•"'l
{
- , .
i" 6 Cv as--„,. Y .,
' '(q'- z 3 a�- �a r7 :a.
jjl :a.
1 ..,,be-(•tc ti • _.• . _ ,_. . .. ,
..t, ,)(k . •
•
A,
9p0
' ' , '-
��� > B e ey/t9,07 //o Yd A .Sc' Z "a `CO.er27" , -- .
"(EN,- ea A ycid.3/ - i
Y7&s C,4 /es b)v tL81 SS .230 •lde/l5`._�yv &► J z;••.
Lit ys L�Q ,�/ 7 2 (:OK 'Sle/ 2 .. � 7 ;r 0/A..
62 o" h1 zNs i P,ea c��„�/�s _
0 94 ucs7- ,P,co,6ry C7o,9 m - . . . : — , -rt ��o rn
/ Sc /af ,¢vE /VE , 62d • ra
re)3C1LE✓we CtJ 9',PeoSi44 i'i v o J2j ERmC/iv°re.✓ �/92/c .GTom _ -
3 z 0/ 8,¢,v .�. r'=
5 ea file 6(J7q ,j'f/; r/•/ _ ' . _ - . _.
! • E i i
-,..?,.„4.:i •:' -,;',,,. • -.-..,:. ..:.' - • . . " , ,
4.
. .
, . 4.
9
: r
/ 4
I.1
. 1
,i1 ; . , . • t 4; ,
GUT . . .
= s2 7.1.,......:.• -,.-...-,...•. ;
, , • , . .
c, ,...-.1„,,•_•.--. • -: . .-. - ;••• .. ...•,
.-.••,,,,,,. , •.
uuu
...
. •
•
, . •
..,, 0,•••.t...,...., . • -.. ,. "; : „ .. .i . . •
, 1
foal Iii ..„
. ...
. .
( --.= 1-3. - ."'.;.,'6Z:•:' . ..r.,., • .,:'. . . ,, -:
1 • -
CO ,zA,47...', .... 1 !. - ..•
tru-il CD '-'•4t,' ... . •
. ... . • ,• •••••
.„ .
• ,..,-.:..2.-::: . , , . 1 .
Li
.„ , i... „,,, ,2•1.„. ,„., , •; ,,
..._ _..._ . . ...„ ......_....„,_ _ _ 1 ,. '• ,
, . 1
. . ... . ,
.,.•, .• . , . .,.. , „
. i .
. • . ; •
-...iv:- -, :. ••• , .
.., • •
...,
'1.2:-...- - , -I , - •
.144.',,•- _,.. ,• .— , . , —. .,.......,---.. .._ —
• • , I
,s';#-i,-,:,':- ..' .' ,':, • ' -;. -•'.., i -.•;- .t:Vi..':,-i- Vt4,, .:/,;‘,./...i_
',.",.' :-... .' 1 •• •: .
,•:,'&.:,..;.: - . 1 . .. .. _ - • ! . :::'
',',PV-;:l. - - . • ',.. :' :,
.• .. , 1: ...;
''ic.,.,,' • " •
1,e02
1
; f, • •
, . .
e-zz .5'5' L3/11/ (771// _57(/ F. •
i 1,, • .
!..--,,3„,,,,,,,•,• _ ..
.. . i ..... .. ..... . .. ............ ........... . i • - ,
P,
7(v7, ..4,6,,,/9/T2/79_,_?s, ..2/5- J__,; . .-iTA __.. 2 6 , •-
,...- ,.
.J.v.. • 0
_ •
. . .
...... -- - -----.• - •--- . ..
•
• • , A.
. •.... .
.. „
.,i',..::•-:- . I - - -- -- • -••• -7 '"•i ',e5- 6 t'm d/-4 --L'.°5 . i ., .
_.-:. .
,...A, . . . .
•,,,. . •.• J. - — . . ,
. __,S7g- •2 E ,x e,e / -.,./
#,.!...,..:• ,. ...... ... :. .•-- . .. ...... ,I:. . • • •-:
k .
v. • 41---1/'n-V /V/rY '"•'
,,, ',..:-.'.,;.'-'..',-r.,...".‘,' • ' ,' . - . .
4 '"•`..',''''''':••:,' ' ': — •• .
. . ..... .......„ . .. —.,,—..,.._ . — _ . .
C. ' c',' '', ...'rj1 . ' .., '- 'c • . ' /S06
• .
. ,- •1. l'.....:• ...'
. ., .. •.,
•.,
. .
...
;.Vt.';:.::;.., .f '.„ „•..., . , , - „„ .
•. , 1...,.,,:,..':, ..t-
i ''.i.1. ' .,tiw), .,,t.w• .i3A ,t,„,,,c,..,. : .. , • , , , '
-•_,:-,4';',...nr:''-j: , . . . . .."-•'''.• t.
, - • A