Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA88-034 • . (.1 id 2,LIF-Feiza -. .- �_ ,n u+uo�cc �A1Ttre t JA�-r*R _ _ R.o.b.i, ,air New y '; II -- b39),151 .E J ., orr t J 1 Xl C S �ii 1-1 \ 9v ' (I( Ii s, 9 e�lhr.Qav� I ill • i 44 eta•t-1 s ' 12/et -1- - 1 x TZe1 Qc�iSt:7__D R N� T1+RU i /I I • *r.:Pill - "- iL .�_. /' ,.taxes • .,2 4V 1- • ' ISIJs IJ —1 tthl GXJMP rER I,id I I Q. 1 �t1J 40' WIDE �� / , !JIM e0.111.O1444• 1 ila P.�J_�R -- -- -- Vu,,, 1- �' fi tr ;t� I - cK-ERY • 12 Y--Vfz-14 _ NM^IF1P1J hARb RAP - 14„ Rs2U I RED 7}}-leb coIGj DUE To wllJoolr.J oPel.l ItJct 1 .cfCeTIo6J AI-JD 12oF - :Bw -►1r� oRFFP VB 1-14- - :, QOrl-AIZ 012 44IM, _ }Jc9 -J11-0=1.--15 T I: 5I • • 0Reg I tis o 45 r re Pt.p.t..l -4)--- . , I11="2,n1 CITY OF MiNTON 731.,' 7 6:- i! owqp . r. v -1.. i JUN21 g - ,,,7 TIvit 62F�IL5 g,UILD1 IJCI- (/-7/a8 ucJIL;.,,,,i6/ZuNii..., r. _(0/24)/as . p,,.,, ,or ,L 1 f le•ipa tr-f Rnvn.t./... .e...--... - 0 . . . . . 1i • li,•, .=i . — — 1 , 1 v j-ju L' 1 ...( 1 [i ,Li 1 , 1 3 L, RLIC I —— . E.I IIPS4K1V1D)M 4.. ' W7Z1\011AUKIOLT_Cio)M _ . i 2 4 .......--- a g -...... --,,-.--•-.-gri N_,..e.- •.. __ _____„____. ._,....1,...,. . --,-,.-...-_-_,..-. ...,... ..................40...... . ,—_,„›...---_,,-. .,-•----'-'" .-ri,.m.i-- . ' ' Ir .12 4-- .. 1 i • . alfr'....-.....r.."'''.""T f-'''' .1.•at:VI 2115,Et ' I Ikt• 1 1 •.,. -- , Yr- .........,, ,. _,,,.., . _ -- - i:41-1-•1011r1L'Aligl,-- i—t---a• - 6-1---0-,, - ---. -i- ---,-____.. __;., . 1 i _..,- __-_ i...1,..., 10,-...... , • e., ,.. )44.. foie ,•;..,„---. . ___ toott, ' • 1' gull- S S •'1,414•"`-'4:.,,,f,:e.--..-4.-.•• ••••••;4.-•,14--7....:•i4w,e0•Totilo. 4„,. ,, i I l,„!,.,...!,„„.. „„„„„,,„„„.,,.. .Actitt.otirktitegttv.6=' , . z _ .. • LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTRACTOR COORDINATION STATISTICS INDEX PROJECT NAPIE: TACO TIME OFFICE BUILDING II f9 I. 10.Rect..,18,TWP 23 N,R 5 E,N.M.In King County,We. .Lying South EACH CONDITION InTD THE PRCDNOT MANUFACTUPER OR...FEM..AND/OR LOCAL OWNER. ACCORD.INC. of eye acuon margIn Al the Oratti.c.d.,1....1.,,.H.ohf..f....y,w..t... mmIoDICIIONJ Fon THEN/RLouIftEmENTE pRzoR TO LuOmITTIDG n illn rn T.E „„NA„E vALLEy HfauwAy F,4 '.U7' 3 RENTON,WASHINGTON 90055 ;•.1 .. II . ...• _ .__ 0 6 .. F.: THE 17E,,OUTLINED BELO.ARE NOT INTENDED TO UE AN CHIAUSTIVE ANALYSIS SITE AREA. 41,ese sp.,. .E -,. n • OF ALL PUSSIBLE AREA OF CONCERN OR CONFLICT.BUT RATH!R 70 SERVE AS n BUILDING AREA. 12,02,SO.,.GROSS - • ....- BEGINNING POINT IN IDENTIFYING COWEN,'OVERLOCRED AREAS IN LIR 4,672 SO.FT.NET OFFICE • C•r4 2 S .. S CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. 1.015 SO.FT.NET wAREHOUSE -.ea Z . X- 3,699 SO.FT.NET STORAGE(BASEMENT, .. . , REVIEW MANUFACTURER'S PROD.,LITERATURE AND GLNERRL NOTTLLFol. E. S S, 2 _ ExISTING ZONING; . - .PROPOSED USE. OFFICE WITH WAREHOUSEIB.5%OF TOTAL GROSS).,. r A. HAU HvACEOUIPMENI nAlp DUCTING U 4 2 0 .- .... ...y.,. B. RECESSED AND SEMI-AECESSED LIGHTING OCCUPANCY: B2(IR.UECI TO.I4 2 2 2 ... V.:•-, —'' C. ALL EXST FANG AND DUCTING D. RECEPTABLE BOXES(i.m.,T.,.TELEPHONE.ELECTRICAL.PL.LINGINI0 CONSTRUCTION TYPE. V-N . F._e iivi a . _ E ANY OTHER BUILT-TH.0R RECESSED EGUIPMENT tMICH MAY PENURAIL THL i ff. S INTEGRITY OF A RATED FLOOR/CEILING OR WALL ASSEmDLY. OCCUPANCY LOAN • . F. BATHTUB AND SHOITER ENCLOSURES. ex„mce(USING GROSS AREA) ' -. Ond FLOOR OFFICE.3SEE SO.FT./100 - 39 VICINITY MAP 7 . . 6 . 2. 1.:.=Vfta..JZSOICTIO.L.PEOUTNEITENTS FOR COMPLEFE INLIALI...OILS lot FLOOR .,s.,,,,GE,IFFTRE,I.C.Eu140.72.1,0;i1..-.F1,01.,54.0.FT./100:3,.1 N - '.• Oliikolltki‘, , 5 f C.,.1.5• ,:- , -,. A. FIRE EXTINGUISHER SIZE AND LOCATION 0 EMERGENCY LIGHTING AND ExIT LIGHTING ..iivp 0,1,,,,,,e.\\ ; , , i h. .; 3. COORDINATE*TN THE FOLLOwING UTILITIES AND COMPLY WITH LOCAL STORAGE. 36DR SO.FT./3D0 11Atest,t% n.... ,li I SO I CT I ON,REOIREHENTS. 85 4‘' . ------ ',. R A. GAG UTILITY G. TELEPHONE PARKIN. REQUIRED. , N wii-EIZALICS2.7,,. 0 •:..-.,j' C. CABLE T.v.UTILITY NET OFFICE AREA. 46,2 SO.FT./200 .23.36 '1'Oh 1141eff4f... PZ•Iff4LA ------:-- S.1-.2.--,,._-.." D. FINER UTILITY(VAULT PEGUIREREM-LASEMEN, NET MARENCUSEI 1015 SO.FT.(1500 . .6, 0 C. TRASH SERVE NET STORAGE.03514,369R SO.FT./1500 .2.46 . .,o ...OF , 2.4(2,,a • IlikaRAVik 4. 71.S FOLLOGINO ITEMS SHALL BE BIDDER DESIGN SYSThf, TIW(TORII/ACTOR 26.49 7-0-3 7) y3 ,,%,"IT!121,°::",i'L° :.`1!.,":,s,ZE ,,"..-rt".c7r°,,Z ZZ7,.:Zjr:Z,T°'"mL"' PROVIDED.ION SITE, • Itir .00110" trIfil'-- STANDARD. 32 CORPACT s I'''''44,4' Atr'''11,11EAla''4. I 11 til P619, 7 _ . . C. PLUMBING SYST__, I A, PROJECT VALUATION. 12.029 SO.FT.C.42.00 PER 8G.FT.T. $505.210 _,.,--. (--Dv..--.-R,T.Irot'f,41:jraSiVer./9.,e N. O.''IRA',Irt:v7 .I:40,01W-Mil It 'I, :• • T. N.f.,-,--,3_ #110,1111EW it- ,.: J i ,t .,74',•g! ;''. ...... . i', MARK A. ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES .StruetargInfngineering Consultants "C2 • ,,,,,,,--- -----.. • . . . • - a m 03 r -' - m m 1 r m 5 z LED • X n z ��- \_f v m O Z . . R. 0 m m N • • 0 5 4 0 6 G a N • Protect No aT-loz TACO TIME OFFICE BUILDING RENTON,WA. I YARN A.ANDERSON,PE,RE Drawn by. P,k- I FOR ACCORD,INC. Issue date' 4/2cya3 FKELIM, 1011 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY Latest rev RENTON,WA.ADO56 PHONE:(205)EE6-555E tt/��('1 V I 7232 INTERLAAHEN DRIVE SW TACOMA, WA 98499 (206) 601-7043 304 MAIN AVENUE SOUTH,SUITE 300 RENTON, WA 98056 (200)336-6600 . • A IzI a7 pl O ecr URR[cToMr r ' A if,a./?6,1Y Renew corps nw5 • ,R)I P1LO. 1`_ `�5R' • xee FaRr ufauMPnou • TSJ --Ms co ‘74::-.5',..7 L te, 1 51:6 j7rf 7.2,, ‘..r4 ... O - I, 6°e�_ _ I 1 .F F I C E _ .—. o ? 1 --II ti r er N0 1 i _- c REmlyeaPno u I • _- -! : 10T1 � = �� Mavu}R` R,Ff uvcER F/ O ri � B iu REOula6MCl.lf+' - d.11 ' WAREHOUSE 8) 1 UJ A v '� l F J —`�eoRP.r�mLg ,, ...,.._• ,,..,be,- " l x'-z�Z' i - t t<m,Ecaw.R�iOExeD�ryy�FAR o ri1 P� [O rJ CSSO c,P "y 0 n s $ 4 " ` C�ey CAbFs 'I � -a-w wo-LL �O� © ' P R m g _ \ w�. HALL>q E 01 o C). 0. C © r ® m aE,Kua log�y v� a ,�.,E uolleF Raa�ooa OFFICE .v.° _2•&-5 Irur u/ © z ; ; -- 1 RECEPTION `s°F'° 41.w�N J £n bra vyuo O g i OFFICE ° -v .R. -�_. mWILL., © W W OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE-4� �0 �n. (�J,O�y �r„ ®t .,IPe.eDr a;:P./a,.reR ALE rtr • O d n .4 < g I�y �`s �j'i /r YouueR <___,cnq•n ra.cam © • C.) > CO OVER (0� Yak" tr-".nu ir1,n'PV,e a �© P w �n �- 0,6 � i of�PFrr v I ,. o°Q fo . MPM`FRT W c E — - v4�ei.A� eMl t ,Tens �T Mnr 'q - © p F 'j D I ri m 'o I2 I ao. ' 4 NMIORPIII U E Hu-,4 [ , • I(' V lO rbLE BRICK LUAU_, n ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE I I OMI 4 MN - Pm...i.i.. 4'9^ �1 P-]M-L i_ tl J i - . _I -___1 i�_ _"__4-]h 4' 2 ,,...,I' I9'-]^ 4Lro' 41-5 J 4-7�t' 1 4-9 voa FIRST FLOOR PLAN e DOOR NOTES• DOOR SCHEDULE ' u ro A Y4" 3. 1-3,4"THICK METAL CLAD FOAM CORE DOOR x - INEDLATINm mass,CON.,ORNF.R AND/oR TR,E 51]E FRAME RATING COIF RBW5E8 U R N :e.A..... .,--....^ -� N SPECIFICATIONS FOR FINIsH 3 3. WITH SELF CLOSING HINGES o eFR r Paa molo .'k'wm - 2,9 N t`ul•>.FaT0 Own z ..oE,Trw•ND 'I-,`_C.'9,2 O5 F.I.g;-,?E: - THICKb. WITH ACOUSTICAL STRIPPING AT HEAD.TATID•SILL 8 ;Zia., ioaeF SOTo HMlxunu - Wn .4TRAue,PAURL _ _ ..a..aR.i.5.4 H.. A N DENOTES INTERIOR ELEVATION e3.9,'Q.31 E. Ra:UIRE9e T - E NEouEATIONS- O ....TOR--- 'b]o — 1,9,14,7 - 3 D - E rAc OFIle Owl'Pu0 PER o MON_�I.,P1K GOIID MTI.. R 9 O DENOTES DOOR TYPE-SEE SEAEDDLE,HIS SHEET .rUtx WALL., T NaLL3 BSFPFR�wsNl NGTON STATE BARRI.-FREE Fnc IL TIES © FLUeu 304e u4 5,] — .d O arRaouLI9Iuc/I THE a,O.ot" 9,4,] ar i..o..v.,.7.^iw..I+„osa....: CEILING ADO fl�u� PR OPug / I STANDARD osx 0 .• . .• 10NWK• 9,4r]i12,4 4 DENOTED P0011 FINISH-SEE SCREW.THIS.FEET Ufa=v. orals,. '0Ee TILER 0 Do HU • 5,"1, 2 ...........-...........i7= n qw a. +LtoUE9.-..-...E ' D.so O • -14cd -• to nw-• 5,7,12 • ] ...w.,,......ra N..+-.^....i..o..n Moots — • _ TO BE o ,MICR u,PE m ,—.wmo Ra bo6B . Mc 5, , D i--P�u.a/n4G Mc • maSSNMELLO1INu LACE WITH▪ STEEL GLAZING�AND,E�s A L n,ico t0 Too 0 FIwM 'bbGG •rL. I HaOR'Mo .u10 o¢oul-R'PMG • MARK IA.D ANDERSON NLY TH& ASSOCIATES rruerurai EngineeringI a nsuiranrs Al • Q1 U/15/a] Nv,--er canoug . Qi 11,,ri IN PLVIEW.aLI Tells A1.10 4441I.GmFG, c RRc-cTouls va-o E V . pmFNV.2N uIO UCDG¢ 2.6 WALL_ �� 4 2:4 WLL ` - -- ® \dR I �YLHWGES UW I7CTi1- l :� �I��A�IO©�`�� 1 9 0 CD N i \ I� A a..�_ c o" 4'a Q c I 'oa O It F 1-}.E 6 5 G c.c.. 33] d o I \ 'I- r Y OFFICE I I '�'©Fi�A�L4 O OFFlCE .I I og ®ot� 7 q 'a 4'.4• a OFFICE 4____i. OFFICE ,..2 ama ---.— - .. I �T �. z J —}o a CORRIDOR ©� CEPTION — �a $ a � J f�e —.-aw unu t&AL JI c�G °"` TET La•¢ BS VIPE)-wRA➢ EEGPIr� �I�Ea5.n llouus�L LF SA 1 I ! a�eo .4 oPoraus`1 z • 3 3 sEe�I.nEmce n�� 11'_I L a4R w:°LL`:,inn. z <- C.;?,an.....-",-- - i I OFFICE OFFICE A ° z ®0 ©Jti e , ew C"a ^hee wuEtE vane r �J�'uee f (4=7-,4,f4 vm°wwmu e° �, W r. e it rt ('mEmAGF/-wAo cv ©"' `",'�'a.l�".au.:H'(d).n a W Y— S �B"O'NIyN KarT•GEILI �15M FT)/ 'O H vI YL �N4- > R_M O EECF. r�<O A CD g .. 4cx,Au G HtFEL neE Fn...rlluq - "a ¢ 0 . P.(u L(LI sl Iaa-nou ) �creo ti'-nzluv amvE�.� Dwu- Ill W D o- LoF.D NLAslI� , „a 11 1■ - o ® ' B ' III n 10 u�Mu,I-TALL m ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE L-JL__ L_'_ � w 41 r 4']Si I ,I I ,I { .. I ., .11 „ j . 1 /1'j 4-5h'L IS-11 * _, SECOND FLOOR PLAN d.N ..�...,,.. ATTACKED ANALYSIS. , Ixs,ar...re e.tws.ee.e. .gee VM11Toc,a,ls^oa�,p,.�eELesee SCHEDULE,H1s SKEET a 61 n. .:. '• owo LN .sesum+a.,anOORS HE v.s -. e H s„Ef , ...P...,zz,, -. 40e.0N GEYIN0011.Up0TEDt.. u— iII au.z,FA . 9iare WALLS 3 I MARK A. ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES sbuuura/ Engineering [onsp/ranlr Li�Ly • ONLYI m MINIONS I . • A n/P/.7 do 9✓7"c a.TOus A b/I/aa euEe PP/15en15 A 1/0/84 LrtY Pe`JIEL.I logo`<Tlok:s • v,,,�p 1Yn RLa+e?!a p WfE1 oG1 [1-6 •a, ' o'm.eom / ■11.I.�..I...'1'H��■ I. _ i�6E:WI © �'A t Me��e �=err�l�' - /_ •. aJ E�d' 4 �5 II�I■f■il■�I■1id■■f■I■�� ► ��—'■I■I■ -- .� I zea „a.ec. -�'�I�i��; �I1111 • •I- -",o`i.�c,w+reRl SII> xoF�K r4 o W OF zi pP OF ER CK • ��• n:�i?n.0 'I I al(Of eTW C1w'►I�1 _ f 11 \ I A /' I- ;� •4)u; sb•T'�"J uwea c. tita,o' 9' d o �v�TP.�I f — y NOJ TH ELEVATION a � E« � id '�� _'_ -- - -,—�� x- �oFsua _ rtnv�rlerA�em KaY�ixn'c./,M?.4 i"Pm sly _I__ 9,1.4':N.uF,flT ref' A:e�,c»>.'.iN,:r.. 'opco GavN„l,:x,' .TOPGP K gJY4 P.aGW!'J'CL- L.1 . - a(r - .O.I .--SC 'Jw @ e -- b -O� F�,-.Tru.°sFwlTe I --- - ° efiE�„ee�Eav; 3 _1_4 . -.P..: J/ NeN. GV�nY.ela+Y- -- d��P� �; A J E�°A'�Lg� pZ .OFFICE r •OFFICE �� I1Nau2r=xT oe wRJ.- - _ z •' w • r--.-. .19ar0,of , _ -- _ o r e..�..awe,=1 . lug.nam/ .A5;ens. I ' _-__ ,'via' r.Z.,).'.O(ii'1 -n .•: ;1:-i ..=y, yI - - . = -- m m `♦E' -%'G bs,NPEIOF W.. pmp.77 ,,,',,:N'o.1,271;'%� - _ _ _ (ew,4,-, - d1o511 1ALJ_n':L d,:.',.., :L.P.ZgC05.. 0r,`LC- dl roucPE'IE rolluo/PE 11.110V ens,E� - o "r_ e)ureze xFEx vu�`.Ca'r. t�J ,U \pbb ---.. �w.u. 3 3 f SOUTH ELEVATION_ anus ua oneusne E z - - _. 'e••1,.d /nEru 0mF LFnsu. cousra.see q.noelx q s z IIII 1:1 Yrc - I ."'wFie.�,rwNi alp - --V- � ci- - - 1-1.v7 an;.:w Ow Ve 2,I�<,T.L-..,a. r m I,�, I m s g,l r,7 w.roJ P.Eo' mmwcxr.ou. ' •,. __2-trek'v.:a_a.,,,,:a �q' ,_.e-..ro 01■rJ�■I.�■'.I■.I■'f.l.1 0© > 12 - (, G.r e�Pie ym. f.. mow;.. w 1 F:Mall .va O - - 2� 1,:__:, I{ ) _I� rAA -�, �' <` Q �r91 .41 W I .- .. I Wow nuu.1au W e n g a I �o I©fell■Ilrl■II■I�I�aI■� F '; S I came' E .' "n ) O 1 o w.P w;'.;t, G - _ _,art--.___ - r`vars r.-. ! \ xo a:°ecicc.�,CeG-�.o_a--rAc E.t �I. II f� 'rKiLVR Ptnu me 1. s-I-:Gd'r-i,- —NsiM Mk4E VExeePr a l.mno�P. � 1 OFFICE I,Y-views �� -- ,,L'- WEST ELEVATION Ploy o -- _ - .n.:,.., -"ice r'.KI 'alL•uw.ordi in�"0.,:,.r..'-�s�-_max, o-�.._-t.r..e,..., I ,If I. Z,W,'a.. IC) O I ,,:,01�9oE M�:fu •r ^'t,��N-..a.a,:0 D C I��II�� .� r 1111 111 1 s __ s ® !' 'reti+Korea�asz ��f ..1 _ �� o i x v 1,�I / _.�1 ti e'ic' �. © I'.�Au,u�W w Z o e L u I■I I��/ ao 2 a 7 o E / Will XIV -"'''' e�ee�R WALL. .. s OFF T,,, I,....To ~(�.r r s -I 'BAST E >"'��E�]1'.F owwua :+I ro es.,r,' . '- 'a S_ ON AT-SOUTH WALL x WAL 'TION AT WI DOWS TYPICAL WINDOW DETAILS ar1.'ew Uuekaa n,. y ' — �� .T • I - MARK A."ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES Sbuc/ura/ fng/veering Consultants ONLYI T IEWm IEv®wu 1au,L mu • 0 - 0 • .c3)� • cgJFfl • a�• N,ore.rreucrw-I. -• GaaoR J Rb eer.scvw-se eavalou tq o — �L iii ml�ff17 '0 t+.aPArws rr-��---xxx��ff ...- .. .,.� ''--..,. ''.7 • C)7:7. .mtien�1 .a I ��'k, ---- g ,`°'�pp° BD °�� o 1:27271027A_ 7272=2727Z2 I2 r.nrzz iq.r,.i ,. . :z.-:•_ Ili .u. ' -- S- V.."t -- / -- 4p "4A �,1, '05,61, ;; 1owtr F, 1^ trii p`_"A' f) �q � : 1 4P '. 11 D qi , C9)5G �,G l� 7>�h1,4 ) ¢ 3 r i;C ;,,I. �T s rY {. rr �ITTf :0: T) .. 1i -- l .e — _i---- -, u, ��1 '"-',1''1•' !'r�..�L/--cl-[ b.ZEZT2., �TL�L-IL/-tJ.-LtL✓� /� 'go Ar #'i. LL/J 1 11 V Z n a..Gxa..... veyNe Le R4 VI�CP,•gq°O,G, 0 '" i' Ise-F uzr<o�'''n nrurc, i C !�•e�_ _ - (3)I�- (A�I��fl� , _ ¢ _ i suw•e r TP ee H r _ tl�}iP'. V'+'r+uePxti w-•-x �i CS).2.,el.v.45.FIF.5,..."5 P' • Of"."7— - . ,. . Mare M ON./ M .2•E+^fiL MUL4M i 1 1 - ,*1 JI _ 1 Vll llti..,!111 1 ✓_19 / B as ear {� a 'r 1 ,. A% 1,11...1�:� I / - ill i� _ errM m Pcn _ I .t- �(�M ?� ilit 'r`_S_l'2 ! ! o �i rwrer-ewzo� / p y MNC?A'00. i • rAxruP-c / f% )p-e, 1 1 R_ Illf I °"no"'c _ - —teeaT-woo. (2) a;� co� o� 'I o ta ei-raen-�I' . riwged-Liu C3 . '�'� 'N`'qw'.:'� Ili I TMaw rwr - ►�. iI-1,G%Aa JrI‘roC•' 'I!'I' p. 1 1 SI TREE PLANTING DETAIL a i�ap, ,,„ c�',�� 'q�,�' 010 • Rlitjll C f i�• L lCya+` I / / / N uae• nuns•�xL. T� v C4) C�JfZ� tier:a •a�_neee..e^ev`ee, �v"`C' )�'7'f G� Fz'(! 1 I 70� m -- er YAW Re.11.IGSNI CUPR L�ftZ • MNe 2. • I D•��` I I 1 `& 1 m,°Rrsr e c^ I IVI 6 Ca)FY ca„)� Ur-o�'a . pZV�I •C1 rrti vEF M d�p ...kit: p�Ps..^r-Iriw. 1�• MNL'24'b.G. c .)ic c .)GS _ NEVlB11DPIi �►' � ,u II I o-.4 o nicn-+err+cer-� m �>R.M cY1 Nil ct) / " G �4. - negm ro POFM • to j. ,1)'*- ., _ _-- C67 P� I A . wveF oru �iil\!� liE - C�)� _ M C,, Ip� 1 W , 6 S I µ P�saL MNCIi'0-4'0.e. • • L 5 O J r PLANTING PLANa 1 fi = SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL '4- I'',2.0 Leo° y�t F LL-- _ .� I. of A o°uR RD FORE&LSN. eD BY PERSONS FAMILIAR WITH THIS HIND OF voRx AND UNDER THE SUPERVISION BYMBOLB STY. BOTANICAL name COMMON NAME SOD RF°,Av.B - I co '- 2 ser. LE _Sur CAL. NO �..` ob xowa-Fen iu c corvr mccs n°sncenr ro euu.°incs snou:o ee wun°ro scxeex BURG vnu _ evla.e. mews. , -R-vr CAL. I �,. NSUwN --- S. TREES TO BEPLANTen A MINIMUM•FEET FROM CURB WHERE CARS WILL OVERHANG. • m S(°•-rut. MD • 4. PLANT COUNT ON THE ULE IS FOR THE E IS A • S. HE To BE eonsrxueTEDrvrtxrmnxtmuMVnl smeEstoeEnERs a PUNTING PLANSroaG eCeansw Rn THUNDERCLOUD. I-S/°•-r CAL. SHALL GOVERN. ANCY.THE PC 1 UPRIGHT ENGLISH OAK I-Nw-r CAL. BPITE :.r\ OR 2 Gueacus R°BUR WAsneurA•a Sur-rewL. N ' \/•.. HEIGHT ANT/LOCATIONS. 4i • PLAN-- • R. SUBSTITUTION OF PLANT VARIETIES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT- 2 T LL PLANTING TO RECEIVE r OP MEDIUM FIR BARK MULCH. MN — MAHON.NERVOSA • LONGLEAF AMPVN°MJCP B. A THE ID PROPOSEDS ET ON RREET TREES w sM SHALL PLANTED WITHIN TH uHnEXISTING cx TINCONCRETE EXISTI CO CRETETREET SIDEWALK AT n SPACINGOF 20 OB 1� I nxorvu PIERIS FLORIBUNDA MOUNTAIN PROD - HEIGHT 'ri Z D t � EA To- S ALL PLANTING AREAS TO RECEIVE A MINIMUM r OF APPROVED TOPSOIL TREES. RHODODENDRON BLUE DIAMOND' BLUE DIAMOND - I ..,�..J;:''•lJ= .L(" �- �� s RS — RHODODENDRON SAPPHIRE. SAPPHIRE RHO.. 2 GAL. IB. ALL TREES TOBE STAKED PER THE TREE eun r E L, SR RB 1� RHODODENDRON SHAMROCK. HAMMER. SHAMROCK RHODRx000 } r. HEI i. GHT a IM HEIGHT ` O - II. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE.NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS.PAVING. RY LOW YELLOW AMMER I 1(—SUDhTL TO THE OWNERS UNDERGROUND TU DONANTATN DAMAGE GECCAUSED NAL BY THE LANDSUPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPAIRED VD 12 VIBURNUM UAVIDU DAVI RNUM R GAL. - i I "2eG(IOFI II `SB' NONNDACTO SHOL eE RESPONSALE FOR OBTOININU RSQURSo eeEUITS.RRMAT*N'"U"bee''''ET ". (:,-‘1 0 1 EXISTING STREET TREES TO REMAIN • �J — fitOUNDCOVER DETAIL *GENERAL NOTES . PLANT SCHEDULE e JohnsonBraund design group, inc. architecture,landscape&planning consultants • 0 • Ro_ . . RAINIERAVENLEEdVii ,�/24' , , h r ' RY A '2'''''-v..-,A.— t 7- Ir , 1# o _- E z o �--L—_ I' ng, Li 1 k1 t1� 2 L1a = ,22 • I I • AN I I2 5 n© I I ' ./ {{�et 7.. © i y ie , m ` yO 1, 1 , t-i c / ji X 1- \ F. b m � � j? ° " LpNv i Re 'We E- © 9% i' n zz4, -- l/ 6 e . 9� 11 le' 'le=-t. va-'- �, �a' {I', , a \e 1111 = -..®I .IIQ m ® , �� \ i n I 1 + I�.It I M �AI�" __�/ ti \_ m n1 I1 .I I o L_ 0 .1 1E II I I ' _ T-- ----------- O CIS I I III i n 31J id I I I I Th,r 1 __.(' 0 1 1I `�-1 " I ll ' Prolecl No TACO TIME OFFICE BUILDING RENTON,WA. I MARK A.ANDERSON,PE,SE 1 Issue I by POW ACCORD,INC. SSUe dale R:1911 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY p Latest rev IRENTON,WA.90E56 PRONE.11061226-6666 9 © 7232 INTERLAAKEN DRIVE SW TACOMA, WA 90<99 1206) 501-7OA3 ___I 304 MAIN AVENUE SOUTH,SUITE 000 RENTON. WA 100053 (206)206-6690 .z% BACKGRouNL): APPLICANT: Accord, Inc. , PROJECT: Taco Time Corporate Offices ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF 034-88; SA 034-88 • DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for Site Plan approval to c allow the construction of a corporate .office building having approximately 12 , 030 square feet (including 92% of office space and 8% as storage) . . • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the south side of South 2nd Street, and east of Rainier Avenue South. • ' • I — • 11, 1)) ., .___I , i. - "1 7 R- 1L111 Br _j' ,_ . .„ _I.. • i . I \i,Pit..\\1\toffez‘.,..\\. i .'e .). -1-1—: '44'.0. . .', , I , • 4 . `-rt)It,,hi -r . •\�- \ I; '' •1, d• JI I I I I • ' \ -L ' / • J _ _�m se,,oR JNIOR ilt\\ IHIG1.I HIGH _ I . i" I�Il I • S l.H00L SCHOOL t"0. , It/RI • .•.-,..5 2... a . .. . . . . ,,., . . ifil 4 3 ,Arr,....._ L'f1ii i iI Sw 2 PL Q ;� r .I 3 ,y 1 \ , ki . -/.4,-.:Lti 1 Z 11 " • k 11;" iftif Ont. -7-A V . Y l : I I j --1 .114Wiii _.1 &)i.....::, , : if t:„Elvsii iiilittl.sir. . _RI" : , go .IIN lill. .,._, ;itfts 431 17414i;.:7:12.111W‘; i 4.1 ' -2.... 4!!Plip."40711.16:24 .11:12 • i .• ill:11 • 1 i 1149r... , if • . i IV 11.4* .--s 1144 tifr4 . I) Te\(-17.. ..—,'. : -511._\' ......7. . •b Itill'il.1 - --L-:;1- t -l' rims _11.1 . --I 41414 / \ , e- \ ti 1.1 --LI1 r iftf •7-_-, , :4 \ \ -i_. .\,. __ / 4 -tp...... •��/Q�,.w \ \ \ _ Iu1 L�. ,t jr4 �!� ^ti i� Off'-Cc -f0 \s �J , • .•.. I+ ".rf ' ',4,l�� `F , ids "��,. i ._,. \ \ \\ 5. y' 0'3 •., �$ Co CITY OF RENTON isIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE : February 13 , 1989 TO: Maxine Motor, City Clerk FROM: Sandi Seeger, Planning Dent . C55 RE: Accord, Inc . File SA-034-88 With this memo I am transmitting the above referenced file. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 CONFERENCE REPORT NAME OF PROJECT: . I t DATE OF CONFERENCE: 2,,3- q ey5 PROJECT TIME: 1 1‘ 9v (START) ."0° 1\4 _e_OEND) NAME AND TITLE OF ORGANIZATION PHONE PEOPLE ATTENDING • etJ q LUn pLivitol&xe biu 215 -056) 121Pr 255-g55 cammum: To so uti4 5 1 Cf ViSPV G k '.5-1,1\c(o.hArl NtA) 961z "To 3001-4- ) Dtttlfc., ()UGH- .10:co i.j? )/vc, I. havt R,`\, • -14V C.t5C4=1: tkix--M 4e64,kcetti ct,k c.,43KA7 t i•-1G, Givr=ett LiG-• c=tns, tiv c_ocznre mialu 6,we OterC //6v11 -4.401( . e„ Gr7L,p' Cc9(.,4 r:,11/t t_tFerre Cvrts(1: ir—izAn Acv 6141eiv • Tacolirne E 7.1 ‘,7 : immaN LL2ACCORD, INC. ?`1 �' `� I i { 1911 Maple Valley Highway tbihs-i 6,4,: — Renton,Washington 98055Ula_JIIVG/Z©IVIh1G DEPT.(206)226.6656 September 27, 1988 City of Renton Building Dept. 200 Mill S. Renton, WA. 98055 ATTN: DON ERICKSON Dear Sir, In view of the City of Renton's Lake Street revision project it is our opinion that the proposed Taco Time Office Building to have been located at the corner of Lake and 2nd Ave. is no longer a viable location suit- able to our needs. We have recently negotiated a pur- chase for an alternate office building site west of the Maplewood Golf Course on the Maple Valley Hwy. , contingent upon approval of a building permit. This decision was based upon the fact that the Lake Street revision has made the property in the area more valuable as a retail site than as an office building location. It is now our intention to develop the port- ion of the newly acquired property adjacent to the Taco Time and complete the remodel of the restaurant. A copy of the plan is enclosed for your review. Thank you for your cooperation with our contractor, Jack Love, and my son Matt, Project Coordinator. Sincerely, Frank J. Tonkin, Jr. "ANYTIME IS TACO TIME" ti CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor MEMORANDUM DATE: August 31, 1988 TO: File FROM: 4, , Jerry Lind SUBJECT: Accord Incorporated (Taco Time) 200 Rainier Avenue South File No. SA-034-88 Don Erickson and myself today met with Matt Tonkin, Frank Tonkin Sr. and Paul Casey regarding a major change that the applicant has proposed for the above referenced project. In this meeting, Accord, Inc. has now proposed deleting the new office building from this site altogether. It is now their intent to go ahead and provide the parking on the site as planned which will instead serve as overflow parking for the Taco Time Restaurant. The building site where the office was to be constructed will instead remain as vacant property and be developed at a later time with a different project. Accord, Inc. will also not acquire additional property adjacent to this site as Jack Love had suggested on August 25, 1988. Accord, Inc. is now planning to relocate this planned office building on a different site in the City along Maple Valley Highway. As a result, it will be necessary for them to apply for a new site plan approval with the new site. We also told them in this meeting that it will be necessary for Accord, Inc. to write this office a letter of their intent to modify the current site plan approval. When we receive this letter, we will complete our administrative site plan approval report. jfl tonkin 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 $i ® CITY OF RENTON NAL POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor MEMORANDUM DATE; August 25, 1988 TO; File FROM; 1L Jerry Lind SUBJECT; Accord Incorporated (Taco Time) 200 Rainier Avenue South File: SA-034-88 Today, Don Erickson and myself met with Jack Love of Accord, Incorporated of Taco Time regarding possible changes that Taco Time may be proposing for their above referenced site plan approval. I was notified approximately a week ago by telephone from Mr.Love that he wanted to meet with the zoning staff to go over a new proposal to expand the project. I was told that Taco Time has a option to purchase some additional land directly south of their current project and that they had an idea of relocating the building further south or perhaps developing this area for additional parking. In the meeting, Mr. Love stated that Taco Time was uncommitted as to how they would develop this additional property or if they were indeed going to follow through with the purchase. He wanted to wait and discuss this further with his staff who are now on vacation. As a result of this new proposal requested by Taco Time, the planning staff has delayed the completion of the Site Plan Approval report, pending the outcome of this meeting. We were asked by Mr.Love to delay this report until next week when Accord will have a chance to decide on how that want to proceed. jfl 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 #no- CITY OF RENTON is& ' MAYOR Earl Clymer August 4, 1988 Mr. Jim Tonkin Taco Time Accord, Inc. 1911 Maple Valley Hwy. Renton, Wa 98055 Re: Taco Time Building Permit Issue �lA -oWtig Dear Jim: Thank you for your letter of July 27, 1988. I have reviewed your situation with the Planning Division staff and as a result I share the following. Planning informed me that revised plans were submitted on July 26 which generally appear to address the city's concerns. The driveway on Rainier Ave. S. near 2nd Ave. S. apparently still poses a problem for the Traffic Engineering Division of Public Works. (You may wish to discuss this with Gary Norris, 235-2620.) The site of the new building is apparently now acceptable to the staff and the roof treatment complies with the building code. This has resulted in a much more attractive building when seen from all four sides. This project has taken longer than normal first because of the peculiarities associated with the original site. (It relied on the continued use of the Seattle Water Department's utility right-of- way for required parking and circulation.) Secondly, in an attempt to improve the project months after the original submission, your application was substantially altered when you acquired the adjacent parcel to the south and redesigned the project. While this helped to address the parking problem it resulted in further hurdles that had to be overcome. The city staff has been working very closely with your architect (Paul Casey) over the last few weeks to resolve these problems: When at one time there appeared to be an impasse, Don Erickson suggested that the best way to resolve the matter would be to refer it to the Hearing Examiner for early resolution. Paul indicated that he would rather try to continue to work things out with staff and, as a result, this latest revised site plan with modified treatment was developed. Uv .;.,i.iOL. :;U0..._ �_'.... � -_.. JU\ Jim Tonkin August 4, 1988 Page 2 I think we now have a project we can all feel good about; one that will be an asset to the community and fit in with its neighbors. In closing, I want you to know that I am happy to have your building downtown and am looking forward to your continued participation in the Renton business community in the years ahead. Sincerely, jS Earl Clymer Mayor 88117.ec/jah „ F CITY OF RENTON MAYOR Earl Clymer August 3 , 1988 Mr. Jim Tonkin Taco Time Accord, Inc. 1911 Maple Valley Highway Renton, WA 98055 Dear Jim: Thank you for your letter of July 27, 1988 , regarding your application for a building permit for the Taco Time office building on 2nd Avenue South and Lake Avenue South. In discussing the status of the project with the Planning Division staff, I have been informed that revised plans were submitted on July 26th that generally appear to address the City's concerns. The driveway on Rainier Avenue South near 2nd Avenue South apparently still poses some problems with the Traffic Division of the Public Works Department. You may wish to discuss this problem with Gary Norris, our Traffic Engineer, as well as their reason for not supporting the 40 foot driveway. The siting of the new building is apparently now acceptable to the staff, and the roof treatment has been worked out to comply with the building code. This results in a much more attractive building when seen from all four sides. Because of the peculiarities associated with the original site (It relied on the continued use of the Seattle Water Department's utility right-of-way for required parking and circulation. ) , this project has taken longer than normal. Also, in an attempt to improve the project, months after the original submission, your application was substantially altered when you acquired the adjacent parcel to the south and redesigned the project. Although this helped address the parking problem, it resulted in additional problems that had to be resolved. Staff have been working very closely with your architect, Paul Casey, over the last few weeks to resolve these problems. When at one time. there appeared to be an impasse, • Don Erickson suggested to Paul that the best way to resolve 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2580 Mr. Jim Tonkin August 3 , 1988 Page Two this matter would be to refer it to the Hearing Examiner for . early resolution. Paul indicated that he would rather try to continue to work things out with staff, and as a result, this latest revised site plan with modified treatment was developed. I think we now have a project we can all feel good about, one that will be an attribute to the community and fit in with its neighbors. In closing, I am looking forward to having your building in our downtown and to your continued participation in the Renton business community in the years ahead. Sincerely, Earl Clymer Mayor EC:DKE:adk July 27, 1988 11. TacoTirne c;[w: t oe_ ACCORD, INC. JUL 2 8 1988 1911 Maple Valley Highway ;;;; rtrvt Renton, Washington 98055 • (206)226.6656 ELL: Mayor Earl Clymer City Hall 200 Mill Street Renton, Wa. 98055 Dear Mayor Clymer, Enclosed, please find a summary of activity involving the application for a Building Permit for the Taco Time Office Building beginning Sept. 14, 1987. With each meeting there has been added conditions and requirements to meet the needs of the City of Renton. We have pm-chased additional property, moved and modified the building, altered and revised the site plan. Our initial architect fees have nearly doubled. In the most recent meeting, which I was unable to attend, my son Matt, our builder Jack Love and our architect, Paul Casey, met with Don Erickson to discuss what further concerns, if any, the Planning Dept. had prior to submitting for our final. During this meeting there was discussion about deleting our two curb cuts on Rainier Ave. and retaining the 40' driveway on our recently acquired property to access the Rainier Ave. side. Mr. Erickson assured us that this would not pose a problem in that it made more sense to eliminate the 25' and the 40' curb cuts closer to the intersection, leaving one 40' driveway further away from the congested corner. With this "final" concern seemingly resolved, along with a handshake and Mr. Erickson's assurance that it was within his jurisdiction to approve the curb cut, we felt confident in that we were finally going to obtain our build— ing permit and begin construction in time to have the roof on before the bad weather sets in. As the summary discloses, we are still at an impasse. We have tried very hard to comply with the many changes required by the City but we do feel we are not unreasonable in asking to retain a 40' access to the site while giving up 65' of existing curb cuts. If there is a way that you feel this can be resolved, please give me a call at 226-6656. Respectfully Yours, /—"), . s i Jim Tonkin 4 4 A Nrv-ru r _ 'T.' "•^1 .,_M " MEMORANDUM DATE: JUNE 14, 1988 TO: JIM TONKIN, ACCORD INC. FROM: PAUL CASEY AIA SUBJECT: TACO TIME OFFICE BUILDING-CHRONOLOGICAL SUMMARY OF BUILDING PERMIT RELATED EVENTS 1 . 9/14/87- Conditional Use Application was submitted to the City of Renton by Randy Munson . A private drive and parking area was located on the Lake Ave. rioht-of-way. The new building was located along the south property line with required parking located in the Seattle pipe line right-of-way . Randy reported that the plan was reviewed with Jerry Lind prior to submitting . 2. 10/22/87- Additional information was requested by the city and was delivered by Paul Casey. The Conditional Use procedure was changed to a shorter Site Plan Review process, which does not require a public hearing , since the Warehouse area of the building was reduced from the initial application . Status checks of the city ' s review were made in November . No problems were anticipated with our application by Jerry Lind at that time. 3. 12/9/87- Building Permit application made to the City of Renton . 4. 12/23/87- Revised Site Plan and Landscape Plan submitted to the City of Renton . 5. 12/28/87- First Determination of Non-significance was issued for the project . No conditions were imposed on the project . 6. 01/5/88- Irrigation Plan submitted to the City of Renton . 7 . 01/12/89-Plan review from the City of Renton received . The only major change outlined in this review was the deletion of the parking lot access directly onto Lake Avenue . S 01/18/88-Seattle Pipe Line Right-of-Way use agreement was requested and sent to the City of Renton . Jerry Lind reported later that the Pipeline Right-of-Way agreement, which allows use of the pipeline Right-of-Way for parking , might not be acceptable to the city in lieu of on site parking . Their problem with the agreement was that the agreement is not perpetual . 9. 02/10/B8-Don Erickson requested a landscape plan that indicates the existing landscape around the Taco Time store be submitted . He also requested that we send a letter to him requesting that off site arking be allowed for this site. Letter sent on 2/12/S8. 10. February- City continues review of project. Jerry Lind reported that the Site Plan Review could not be approved without a resolution to the on-site parking problem. • 11. March- Adjacent property to the south of the project was purchased . Site plan studies which use the additional' property were prepared for client review. Site plan drawn on 3/21/88 was selected . Plan concepts were reviewed with Jerry Lind over the phone and in his office. He reported that he did not have any problems with our direction. 12. 04/29/88- Revised Site Plan Review application which incorporated the new property was submitted to the city. 13. 05/16/88- Revised Building Permit application was submitted to the city. 14. 05/25/88- City of Renton Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the revised Site Plan Review application . A Mitigated Determination of 5rd Non-Significance was issued . The significant conditions on this determination were to delete one existing drive access onto Rainier and to require access to the loading dock be entirely on site. 15. 06/01/88-Meeting was held at the city of Renton to discuss site plan' changes. During this meeting Don Erickson presented his own site plan which relocated the building back to the location indicated on the initial conditional use application . He stated that the Planning Department would insist that this change be made, or something very similar to it, or they would not approve the application . He said he would also recommend that the parking lot connection to Lake Ave. , that was previously denied by the Traffic Engineering Division , be reintroduced to the site, plan . 16. 06/02/88- Meeting was held with the Mayor of the City of Renton . During this meeting , Don Erickson agreed to allow the building to stay basically in the same location but with the edge of the building located 5' north of the south property line. The 5' space would be used for Poplar type tree planting . It was also agreed to flip the building over so the loading dock access would be from the parking lot. 17. 06/03/BB- Discussion between Don Erickson and Paul Casey took place at 5: 15 pm. During this discussion , Mr. Erickson expressed the need to extend the mansard roof around the south side of the building and to add windows in the south face of the building . He said we could move the building a maximum of 5' into the landscape setback along Lake ave. • v • 18. 06/08/88- A revised site plan was submitted directly to Don Erickson for his review. The site plan moved the building 5' north but not into . the '10' landscape buffer along Lake Ave. Building Code provisions require, considering the large overhang of the building , a minimum separation of at least 11 ' -4" from the property line without protected openings. Protected openings have wire glass in steel frames. No mansard roof was indicated on the south side of the building . 19. 06/13/88- The City of Renton Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the revised site plan . Jerry Lind reported today that the mansard roof overhang will be required along the south side of the building . In addition la minimum 8' building setback will be required by the planning department instead of the previously agreed 5' from the south property line. No windows will be required on the south face of the building , but some sort of contrasting wall treatment will be. Everything else indicated on the site plan was acceptable. Please note that if the mansard roof is attached to the south face of the building, a minimum of 11 ' -4" building setback is required to avoid non-combustible roof construction above the south face of the building . MEMORANDUM: DATE: JULY 20, 1988 TO: JIM TONKIN, ACCORD INC. FROM: PAUL CASEY AIA SUBJECT: TACO TIME OFFICE BUILDING-CHRONOLOGICAL SUMMARY OF BUILDING PERMIT RELATED EVENTS 6/14/88 TO 7/20/88 1 . Meeting held at Renton City Hall on this project with Don Erickson , Renton Planning , Jerry Lind , Renton Planning ,Matt Tonkin , Jack Love, & Paul Casey . Summary of agreements made during this meeting : a. Building will be located 5' from south property line with a 5' wide overhang on the south side of the building . Roof overhang would be non-combustible construction . Mr . Erickson and I agreed that Jim Hanson , Renton Building Department , would have to concur with this solution and that Mr. Hanson would be consulted on Monday . b. A 5' landscape buffer would be placed adjacent to the existing parking area along Rainier Ave. c . Mr. Erickson agreed to the use of a 40' wide drive entrance off of Rainier Ave. to the new parking area. He stated that he would coordinate this change with the Traffic Department, and if necessary change the designation of the project to a mixed use or shopping center to allow for the 40' wide drive. d . City will start on report if they get a reduction of the site plan by next Tuesday (6/21/88) . We agreed to re-submit drawings within 10 days. 2. During discussions with Jim Hanson on 6/20/88, it was determined that a non-combustible overhang that abuts the south property line is not acceptable per Uniform Building Code requirements . A revised solution was obtained the same day that would meet building code requirements along with Don Erickson ' s south overhang requirements. The new solution relocated the building 6' away from the property line. The south overhang width was also reduced to 2' . A sketch was sent to the Don Erickson and Jim Hanson on 6/21/88 for verification . 3. Site plan reduction was delivered to Jerry Lind on 6/21/88. 4. On 6 23/88 a modified sketch was returned to Paul Casey from Jerry Lind which made a minor modification to the proposed roof line at the south east and south west corner of the building . Mr . Lind Gtated nv'er the phone that this solution would be acceptable to the city. 5. The city was requested on 6/20/88 to provide departmental comments from their review of the previous building permit application made on 5/16/88. It was stated by permit counter staff that these FRmmr- { -E Fpwlh hp picked up. Two trips to the city by Mark Anderson sand Assoc . employees were unsuccessful in obtaining these reports. Complete comments were later received on 7/5/88. The city review comments stated that only a 30' wide drive onto Rainier Ave. could be used . b. 7/8/88 to 7/12/88- Working drawing revisions were made to the building and site drawings with the exception of the driveway width. 7. 7/11/88 to 7/18/88- Discussions were held between Jerry Lind , Don Erickson and Gary Norris, Renton Traffic , to determine if a 40' wide drive could be used . At this time, only a 30' wide drive will be allowed . MEMORANDUM DATE: August 1, 1988 TO: Don Erickson AUG 1 1988 s Lb- FROM: Gary Norris SUBJECT: Taco Time, SA 034-88 South 2nd Street & Rainier Ave. South We prefer not to have a 40-foot driveway along Rainier Ave. This is based on providing a controlled situation which enhances pedestrian safety. Gut 72, GAN:ad cc: C. Morgan GAN110 MEMORANDUM DATE: August 1, 1988 TO: Don Erickson AUG 1 1988 FROM: Gary Norris 1 lJ iS 1(, u V � SUBJECT: Taco Time, SA 034-88 South 2nd Street & Rainier Ave. South We prefer not to have a 40-foot driveway along Rainier Ave. This is based on providing a controlled situation which enhances pedestrian safety. 1e( / 22rLlti G� a-66 GAN:ad cc: C. Morgan GAN110 MARK A. ANDERSON & ASS TES -TrlL J o IF ��a,° Q[og[ ] I. 304 Main Avenue South Suite 300 5A-03 36 ' RENTON, WASH I c DATE 7/ w / 8 JOB NOry r� Q ��) (206) 235-6690 ATTENTI�� G /(//`L R- €�`2 `�`'J ....)-e (2:(2 L I RE. -ThccD --r- ( 1-ik c,-7-1--z.--ic.., -06 [ i_.,0 . u,Y OF 1,C,ITC)'4, v_ r____, M '7e- r.' 17. JUL 281988 - WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:— )NG/ZONING DEPT. D Shop drawings Ants ❑ Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications O Copy of letter 0 Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION Co ge Q l ID Pg.t o--rC--s -fl_ F7u'c 0 Q ...,J . is\--w(F- uAic__ _ , , THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: `((For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval (❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS 1--'40tili 0 / 9(.__. -tt c_46\--Le____ t ." ILA) IT- a . v.) (2--rr: u \ g-,- , COPY TO SIGNED: < 144-----C.A.,.. PRGDRGT2443 (nrth,v Inc.,Groton,mass 0147. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ti ® CITY i RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 13, 1988 • Accord, Inc. 1911 Maple Valley Highway / Renton, WA 98055 RE: Accord, Inc.-Taco Time Corporate Offices - South side of South 2nd Street, and east of Rainier Avenue South. ECF 034-88; SA 034-88 Gentlemen: This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the above referenced project. No comments were received. Pursuant. to its statutory authority, the City's Environmental Review Committee has issued the following mitigating measures for the above referenced project: 1. That the applicant shall provide a revised access plan for traffic mitigation which: • a) Removes the• existing driveway midway along Rainier Avenue and replaces it with the proposed driveway on the southwest corner of the property. Elimination of one of the proposed driveways is necessary . if the development is to conform to regulations for the size, number and location of access routes to the property, as the proposed new driveway is located at a point which provides for greater efficiency and safety of access to the site. b) Redesigns other access routes and on-site maneuvering areas as necessary to ensure safe passage within property boundaries. 2. That the applicant shall provide a storm water drainage management plan to ensure protection of neighboring properties from flooding and erosion. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 29, 1988. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 • Accord, Inc. July 13, 1988 Page 2 If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2550. Fo e Environme Re iew C mmittee, Don . Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Paul Casey 10116 36th Ave. Ct. S.W. Suite 12 Tacoma, WA 98498 DKE:sr 4 ENVIRONMENTAL DEcLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-034-88, SA-034-88 APPLICANT ACCORD, INC.- TACO TIME PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING OF APPROXIMATELY. 12 , 029 SQ. FT OF WHICH 92% WILL BE OFFICE AND 8% WILL BE STORAGE. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS LOCATED SOUTH OF S. 2ND STREET, EAST OF RAINIER AVE.S. AND WEST OF S. LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDED, 200 RAINIER AVENUE S. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE ` PROPOSED ACTION DOES ea DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT I I WILL , WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THJ. L�EATOOBEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMI- NATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON Aida y Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath states The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- ject(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicants(s) have VALLEY DAILY NEWS completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Accord, Inc. - Taco Time Corporate Offices Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a corporate office build- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six ing having approximately 12,029 square months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published feet of which 92%will be office and 8%as in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kent, Kingstorage.ndStreet,Property located southvn ao South g 2nd east of Rainier Avenue South, County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal and west of Lake Avenue South if extend- newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for 88, 2A0 Rainier Avenue South. ECF-034- 88,SA-034-88 King County. City of Renton, Parks&Recreaiion-Pan- ther Creek Wetlands Mosquito Abatement Application for environmental review to The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition allow the abatement of mosquitos within , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in approximately 65 acres of the Panther supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Creek Wetlands with a specific pesticide pp g Y ("biologicals") Bacillus Thuringiensis by during the below stated period.The annexed notice a power spreader. Located east of SR-167 (Valley Freeway) and between 1-405 and Public Notice S.W.43rd Street.ECF 036-88 Further information regarding this action was published on July 15 , 1988 R5080 is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 p.m. on July 29, The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the 1988. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner and sum of $ 33 .44 must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Publis Published:July 15, 1988 Valley Daily News R5080 Account#51067 Subscribed and sworn to before me this2 2nd day of__July 19- 8 Nota Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 /r „ NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicants(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. /Accord, Inc. - Taco Time Corporate Offices Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a corporate office building having approximately 12, 029 square feet of which 92% will be office and 8% as storage. Property located south of South 2nd Street, east of Rainier Avenue South, and west of Lake Avenue South if extended, 200 Rainier Avenue South. ECF-. 034-88, SA-034-88 City of Renton, Parks & Recreation-Panther Creek Wetlands Mosquito Abatement Application for environmental review to allow the abatement of mosquitos within approximately 65 acres of the Panther Creek Wetlands with a specific pesticide ("biologicals") Bacillus Thuringiensis by power spreader. Located east of SR-167 (Valley Freeway) and between I-405 and S.W. 43rd Street. ECF 036-88 Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5: 00 p.m. on July 29, 1988. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City' s Hearing Examiner and must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. Published: July 15, 1988 MARK A. ANDERSON & AS :IATES - OF 'MQa9211[7iM[L 304 Main Avenue South Suite 300 RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 DATE Co /el / ^,("� JOB NO c; (206) 235-6690 ATTENTION l 1 l 0 1 ��P 1 �---) RE: 1 TO \ �-' 9 T lc., U l L_O ( ttJC--t- WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: — ❑ Shop drawings Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 1 �� --`\ Nt , S c7 1 j 12 s r = P - L)Isi THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US, 1 r 1 REMARKS Q1 A6�� -'CLi\ t:- \�A-cj A w �t-t— /�/4 ��c? V \ /lam( A {-Y- ,L S C C' EA-) l �4l', l r_iT G Y OF RiNTTON F. li U W.J JUN21-1988 BUlLOl 'G/ZONIN( uLi i. COPY TO 1 SIGNED: j x Z ) , PRODUCT 240-3 /Nj Inc,Groton,Mus.01471_ If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. MARK A. ANDERSON & AS IATES [LEM OF TA kRZI]QTM 304 Main Avenue South Suite 300 RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 (� DATE cc" 6 / (� JOB NO. (206) 235-6690 A TTENTION r// ////`J�`�!/�0 TO A/LJ 1l ` � `J U l\V iT— E T cm k V— WE ARE SENDING YOU / Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: — ❑ Shop drawings Prints 0 Plans ❑ Samples 0 Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order 0 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 `We'J t 7G 7 t..\ \ l--) lz'_i' CITY CF RENTON NE- .'t7:giV7D JUN 0 3 1988 BL LDENG/E0T,HI'M DEFT. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval ❑ Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution — ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment 0 ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Lu r6!9i � .l�. bc) Ac1 , T4-4-k I� 06 J VCD---- - / 0 c ) I� c c ✓A ✓lit L)T - ., c i G - �c-'' A -� --' u . (`r— L F _.q 0 ( W. ► i-.1 .`t/o cJ , COPY TO SIGNED: `k- __ PRODUCT 2403 /Nmf Inc,Groton,Mass.01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. v - •METR0 „ Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 June 10, 199 C33 , s tiff.i { dQk ='.- iwzONING DEPT. Mr. Ronald G. Nelson, Director City of Renton Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA. 98055 Determination of Non-Significance File No. ECF-034-88 Accord, Inc. Dear Mr. Nelson: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsg AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the Q day of 1988, I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a rY� - I'Yt., documents. This information was sent to: NAME: Accord, Inc. 1911 Maple Valley Highway Renton, WA 98055 Paul Casey 10116 36th Ave. Ct. S.W. Suite 12 Tacoma, WA 98498 SIGNED BY: die./AdeAteZe_ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this � A) 0 day of , 1988. e:•:p4�OIARY N? � �i 09 j'••�;;. ;.•'�� J Notary ublic in and for the State of Washington, OF WAS`, residing at W674J-f-11� , therein. Project Name and Number: Accord, Inc.-Taco Time Corporate Offices ECF 034-88; SA 034-88 " ' !80 CITY OF RENTON NA `°- BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director June 2, 1988 Accord, Inc. 1911 Maple Valley Highway Renton, WA 98055 RE: Accord, Inc.-Taco Time Corporate Offices South side of South 2nd Street, and east of Rainier Avenue South. ECF 034-88; SA 034-88 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated and the Mitigated Measures for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Q04 t Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator pc: Paul Casey 10116 36th Ave. Ct. S.W. Suite 12 Tacoma, WA 98498 DKE:sr:cs 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the�icuLt o, bo_exi day of , 1988, I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing documents. This information was sent to: Ofits X- 65 NAME: Washington State — . ad Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section (a///8 Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 • Mr. Gerald W. Marbett Mr. Gregory M. Bush lea /8 Department of Wildlife / Mr. Joe Robels SIGNED BY: 04,7_ 1-L,/J IMt - L . SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ,v fl day of , 1988. ,1,�p `yyVoN EXp�4)��;\1 O••• DiARy cn; 1 •o :0 G : i O � o�n�.9eii ��°;: i`� Notary Public in and or the State of Washington, _•••••••••',)\\ �� residing at `?C=k.)-ra /J , therein. Project Name and Number: Accord, Inc. Taco Time Corporate Offices (ECF-034-88 ; SA-034-88) Sherwin Lisker, EconoLube & Tune, Inc. (ECF-028-88) J.M. Dalpay, Dalpay Rezone (ECF-030-88 ; R-030-88) Valley Medical Center, Psychiatric Wing Addition (ECF-027-88; sa-027-88) CONFERENCE REPORT NAME OF PROJECT: AC.C.ORO , I IvG . ( T/ o Ti ME eJ Rp• OPI-I C E co DATE OF CONFERENCE: L L&KI E. Is t 9,8ej PROJE7E CT NUMBER: SA -0.34 `86 TIME: 4-5 (START) 3 : 25 )• \ • (END) . NAME AND TITLE OF ORGANIZATION PHONE PEOPLE_.ATTENDING L)EkKi L I KI D ei I T-( GF 2 35 - 2550 13) LL OR 1__M PAC I I�-��. r�(, 2_3(5-- G G d Lc e4r-- Act9WLixte_ 7---24 COMMENTS: 1. D 1' cuSSION cF CN V Ifto► onen,7p&L Corioi1'ian g ( l�iiER. Dam rna-f 25 - 19ws) 2 • D1SCuStG1 oIV c 1 t Locq-1 I►u6 Tl+ view r,u►ulDI►v 0 Notti-01wPaQ psw-1b L ' LONIN(. 5-1Ar✓r TO 1',kiwi-It/NI-A. 1-\-u-v kf1/4.)5 wOULPD 1-1VVL TO SC ti 51-it LRIOGri . 3 • TRucv. LORDING 3DAIr U 1JSO PL'Ai - Clardy VICX,a-16 ? RKl& ' 4 Lof�brru(, ow ., 131)'CIhl&JG PVT() S1"R.9,4,1 IP CITY OF RENTON `', roN .`.1 ® k1.^ �v' a9 IRE ,�:=y BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ' 1i to _ 'C!�Y 2 , 9 „ J�iPaE 14 1 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 2. M'" -M'`i' i=--,-= • tom. ._. CITY OF RENTON RECVV ED N_...J;) c: :/ lNC`LAIMf.::C:'........�..lt'al:t�3[:1��P�1.•__..... JUN 3 1988 1:;:E LIS'E � r�l:l ri ;l:::c,....-......; c, MAIL. r,:l:::c:r:::P rt:l...r:::__............ BOYDEN S . RUSSEL BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. N, N.E . 0 :AN1. :P l( "X :rkNY A :D :Fc;: O DEL ADDRESSED UNABLE TO AUBUR WA 98002 . No SUCH. 9961 0. NUMBER { n ;, A• RETURN 10 SENDER >_l.0 • 0 a/0/227 do—.rc....nou, Q 9/eia Lt..,Fev.or.» ©I/Ip/M ortt G VIE6.1 laRrecrc::e t1 t'mca' .v © ©. Q N.T nrw.v V- �' C 1. :.'Do.n.vn ay.. Ar,•Ja /.3 —lllllllllllll_ ;-=^ -,i r11 ai v F7 DJ.' 4?F% . /^rov oacl.W / .�eiG.15 r CLE , all �"i'; � l �r�„ � a� 1111.111 a a _ _ ._ f r u� 0� /�I�.1111I�11g ,o...�cuwc mra•� mrr le a Lw:.:..: a "Huri bit • �.- '�1' • -� wovea.erl ..�,�.�r,"y J �. .�1 � .a • � 'L■I..I >\ y • �� D � y _° -- Ip _- L- - -• - -- :,mm.ED,r.e cos, :mslw'. - g e - . �� _ NORTH ELEVATION* EoL ,r` � i .u! 1-vh.¢ /. 0 si.oy✓aa.r,c�sD. �r�_.r,� w-J'.-.., roa..r�l -- --- \ _ n . J ..iar GE e m sa,ao w.yr,.. ;�s �r v� ll _. __.�;�• o+r.',.r.rn^eD nns Ian ' u€'J`n'�cw; z - - ---- OFFICE • , is c .OFFICE .- n., j o`n`."7,...,.ce r.wa.- 7.- 1 � - �e,.aaa� /eEl .�.e e. J%e'OG%.LLr aa.r Af . e�...d.GC —..._._._. _ m •r't« JJLll ..11'�Y�ioF "::rrrna cJ•v m.e_.rgf \ ��,/ - — - .� A05�I ni urn lf�.:.��.r b • \ \� �_lwr.PL1E h4W/iC[YJI.14 _ .. m )InYEpG l�EliC4A('.gT. • ,v_ _—. —1r— ."-. ��— - V•• ; ; _ _ _ _ SOUTH ELEVATION ETK�•� I I -'- k''•I'o� __'-r'.ama4c.•.c�. u•w ruR.-+- .or>�r a t { •r•I: �r I 3 a I 9' a aa'�•y'o ro-E- •i 1 ` i--:dnr.:... �m ice i�l�l— �� 0 m ! 2 w g - _ . - ¢.,,r,,• I o�.run.�4v.n. '-4E%o o=err.:. i l I! - �.c,.'.°mA ©�...J_�■ �1�1��1 •_ © '^ _ 1 . _ 1;1 �' t !� ! •c- 4, �° 'i• ( I :row W ° = _ _k_,!�, �, - m-'I1;�_I�III_� �.�� 0coal.,iRt Btk'NM I'.I O,� twwiw[r O -,W rL%GC`) II �I�1'�I■I—I�I 'I i■I O l s i _ - _ - -'srv�w .- --- V JIL- i� _ /t r9'e un m..l.nrwr bI - Q oo-J. . _ a a iL - • _—_— ,1 r- __— — • iaulEo- ry ;� i,;,-_rt. - ..oJ.i::a.:...'�-..c_-rm.�-I/ F_ _ _ ~''� mR w ee a rue E Excer I.arno O FFI E a e �e E r u> B G• r+>fDD • i ' • ' ! 0..ou r�.� WEST ELEVATION QQ a':.>.^, I -I •OR 4 -_..!rF. �� •L") _ CF :vi ;«,',`ate,^F>�=�.t I iima roar.ru•ml.+c. : SW • a...aza.J.0 - '1I - 0'P ^'P 6. . r�—_~ r _ _ .� I co.-a.�w.:v 2Z,�, zr.: ..xo. i I ©I 1--I-- 11.' o - •0 '+I® -!•' 0:+....:ralro Gv rc. 1 � r�lilI1 J �I - _ - i .E I. : .raaea wlaSE �11 , a �_ _ i M 7' M_ _ - :• -- _ �I�,_, 13L'r s,1'op--Jar .- C4{c. G i� I 1•sh I I 5- I Z -` ' ir 0.YR Cu'+ 5/ I - IC -cqr(1.41.,9 DE ou..Y 4rve.1 ,•• _ .. EAST E WRilC�]:a e. .�. �.-,r r11 \crs nrr uue >m,vA* _ iI AL S 'ON AT_SOUTH WALL �WAL --TION •T WI DOWS I TYPICAL WINDOW DETAILS `ael..-oc..Rwa: e _. — ____ - - - MARK A. ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES Structural Engineering Consultants .ONLY, nmc m lemma • r.ter..,,.•— • • • 0 , —} .:: _.` mar-• : : '' I ' • ' `cj. r i `_ce P f.;, I ,lTp I , ry ,h p ; v i •. ,,,!-N,- - rn O K•.`Coll '`3, ill ! ,. cn Z � :\\�\,;,- .4' ,t a, '"<;;t.:,,.1 R. 6 y 10' 1 �1 IC ':2F1�I. r, [cn \�,111 I lq m co • L r.I 4, _ III • "C/ C= AVe=le. m1 ry Imo_ I-I n `'s,`4y ' �-.! II Irl' a -T-_s� _ S ,S I I I II'1 Cyr" 'n• ,..;: 44, II lI „J aw __ si Ii ✓I II I l.l ' 1 1 • Prolecl No (TACO TIME OFFICE BUILDING RENTON,WA.1 I NAM A.ANDEfleON.P[.6E ` Drawn by FOP:ACCORD,INC.' Lale5t REtl MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY dle ley ea PENTON,WA.1105e PHONE:11011111-1111 --- __ 7332 INTEILAAREN ORIVE!. TACOYA. WA Oe400 I10e) eel-TOaa _ _--_----111 g aoe MAIN AVENUE EOM.METE.0 NEKTON. WA Deese 1100113e—ee30 ..uer ^j- `i,.,. 'i3"'•J�S., „,„ '0'..;1;.r)r._..I..r,1 •u� ,.I •rt v<f • •4. r, G, a'•: ;rrs r �:y;r ,(r i r.�v , : r't 4`• tit rfy:i a C. I'P`''7 i'S ' •:7 �'3. f i f • �, {� Tii .•Cii. y,. • t'. r't. .1 A� 0 - 0 'I4 1I- . ... - 4. "�: N• c .. _ ., 9KI9L�JR'C �.1IIi�Is}IO.G:'•" \ i INI • 'it,,,,Pip 0� 4 rv.es _Cam. .... � f� �; �P.4�e_'.ra:r _y^.t, .n b�'4 ��---' ( ---- w '�,p YLi/ii -ff Tf77777TiarzTII � 1LaTr r fl r fi-rri';: 'Ir", -_- — -- A4. a --- , — ! y� R rt. F.� 0. II _i oG. a - `ii _ o 7ji'•+ 9 lam` - '- ' y® '.r' r'iV — 7/ 0 a ,G R r'. — �1 J.DDS �.IADfO--%l / -1 is'O�I sty— i Z ig y�lM�/• /A• I • A A 1 - _ �Ll _.tci _ __ I I nov..roNv. !. �+-.kIC•t@, `.-Q'- V/t7(9?AsG �p�.fr/■ I. d � y+ ti:.. �A:II1I 1 C7 ¢ �S 1 7 __ A�y Li L�I� Re5.4- I, I "c>T oc 't' - r r s r i L ) ' • 4. :''.'-.- -�r I A4N 1•R¢e+wVLIe M4LLI-T -i _ I ` .• _ •f%:• en_AMxiiu.fbe: i!MOri4ulnt.Yyff� 1 I ` l `*r:��.r� . • '"'_ ■, TGr� o�aY �I �rf q I S MIMI 3'ti"I_._•- r-'' .I •�,I•.. � �L `} �?I MN 1 I Z - - - - - �I `' rahF c ww,vro,�wn :+ 'r=:i',Fg-4... • YII �}•�"� ....-.r-_.rt'� , v� Ike g ---.T]�a.=.z ALL.TOIL - Imo. i i [p� d�� wxrux ,I f ? I snoutw ` - +„ �' ^ -C S 1 I - 1S�I� _ " �,� Q ill ��h--� 1G- r.lUCy�+• � {yam II _ TREE PLANTING DETAIL .. (�4" s 24Rgp. :Z-_ 11 I I I I / I! trri .I w - - R.or.cnwe»e•or.a. •'� � C lc CZ)R� •gn�rn •ee'eeeeeveeaem"v"�t'�.-1 G3 �1 I �' ,v vrw�i•Ie�c rt 1)PR �f'(i YNC 2�LYi. AFC'�4'O.G. !!J.i!` <1 f'RI I 1 `r� - -- qe-o rva a r v�we C )PF (3.)RY a fm)Gz� p�C! `•, r� d g 4. •P�crnw. - MNe'L}'bG. LTL. C ..)G? IEXI CE I�Dp� �I 2.r yE(t A 3 _-_ - Mrl'YCYw-waJi-GM A,B f'lIG1'1 E.^ H GCP-T'I 1 •1 FI r I.a eu..ro nx.n �F�t1 I Im1, 91Z c' 24•c . �'u, - ! C 7, I I I `P 5 -_- - A WgeR w-.9w t1iijl, , F I _ w. C�)C.ri E D . C?}i'ap. I W tl S .-s+ w TURe V MNG 2!°O.G. ko 'me 1ri. • • • N corm 00,1,4,11. Y�✓MeRI rear PLANTING PLAN > - - SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL L ✓%•i"='YJ'-a' H = c 8• A e o- 0 \: I. AU.aw«� a PERFORMED B.re,�x,.x.awe OM TN1S RIND O..ORA.ND UNDER P�SUPERVISION ,.e�, BOTANICAL NAME .I.._Dv_ o • ww.a-..W.Jn,9.23cLiO z PLANT USAIor'�"xr ONN P N ARE IAGR'rLLIAr TI a NO MAT BE SUB'o SUBJECT.'TO ADD TO ADJUSTMENT w me FIELD BY 2 * RED SUNSET ILSOLE s—x-ua•u1- � NNELICAFE SCR...,BURR HALL 1 i • 1_ TREESTO.<Puxr<DA.0UMUM.ee<r.ROMCURD.HERECAM�or.N.SSC. . _,•- '� :. THE SCReDDIt D FOR THE CONTRACTORSCONVE CONVENT-NU,a THERE DA DISCREPANCY.THE PC s �PRUNUS S:C DE. I.,•_:� S. CEDAREnALL ,DETO.ECONSTRUCTED.ITHR.A,SUSSCISIDTMDPES.SEEPL NTINGPLANSFOR D�e�oD�xoe.4�aT. UPRIGHT o.. R_ CAL- �� r mm v n.PN • R. SYMPTOM,.c.RANTVAR2Tm ARE SOWER TO APPROVAL BY IRE O.NER/LANDSCwPE ARCHITECT. .1 LI _ N NEIGIIT P I . YIA..31 , I. ALL PLANTING AREAS TO RECEIVE r OF MEDIUM VTR BARR — NANOI°NERVANOSP aroAer I Z_ .I 11 OB OSAIARLA HEIGHT AgoUuXina. , ` TOE ro FEET STREET TREES SHALLC PLANTED ior ININ TISHALLDE...TINCONCRETEROCCHA.AT A SPACING2°I Prexu aeuuxw D _ .A.{+4i.-. :zm o.5?14Fv• ro xturo. S. ALL PLANTING AREAS TO RECEIVE A Nwruuu T.OP APPROVED TOPSOIL,EXISTINGTCN STREET fa. D' BLUE DIAMOND aNODD, - a S is". '�■"" •- - -" IL ALL TREES TO BE TAPER TN!TREE N DETAIL,SHEET , SR = _ _ ... .: ..,i .':.. uY—� '1 'I TOT eo eRssnrDP D ewO sm T LAxosCAOSCO rTTCT"STAuee RAPSA" VD 12 VIBURNUM DATION Lov MANNER' DAMES VIBURNUM TILL. qvirtigiaffmII - CONTRACTOR ��n�xoev cAcrrox Ar:oni nonnoiwnUAL cosi.'AXE t.i.CP.SSAVI PRECAUTIONS TO PNe Ten ex VEIL VINE, RV f� �iC//nONI I 'E'coMu Lutiee TACO.DAU UDRUer OTTT USA TUTOIIOTIA ODlwOA srsre0 bet STOAT ST. l,, DADrwe STRUT TREES TO REMAIN [,I \ LII I GROVNDCOVER DETAIL .GENERAL NOTES • PLANT SCHEDULE i 1 • JohnsonBraund design group, inc. architecture,landscape&planning consultants 1 ;,i, BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Accord, Inc. PROJECT: Taco Time Corporate Offices ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF 034-88 ; . SA 034-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for Site Plan approval to allow the construction of a corporate • .office building having approximately 12 , 030 square feet (including 92% of . • office space and 8% as storage) . . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the south side of South 2nd . Street, and east of Rainier Avenue South. • .tiv 1 .) . 14I i\P-t,\ j .fr_ \\• , 1 • 4 �o S. `II5Q1N I_ • ►; 1713 \ �• ? \ - • y R— i • U � . p 1 • - \ Lsw y.,.l m , j �syJ rt SEMOK JVNrOR .i\ n ,. I HrG F+ NIGH \ �._ I �� 'Si.NOOL SCHOOL A— _ . 7:- . C/Ty� s i ?k, ��/�lp,4/ 41 II I il© err (V1314.17 - •--__= y A (:- INN 1- 7/.. 4t. h,.....-::„.; ,,,,i �sw !MINr.; R- ! . ? .R iL; � I i� *; es I • 1;0 ,. , •,, ,. hi/ _.. .3 //y/' (ems _ t. 1 rill! . ..a to - - • • L. II! If/ ' O (� 1: ,,o' •I:11 NIA R—;, / ,� \\ L \;' • ��i ___tgwu: w 1 ,f/ ..._..) . • . .,, 1>t, , 3_JF I]'-......: d,, 1 l wiitf ftr' y \ \ • \ • • I u ram' •,r r C' •--- 11 - .. . rN i ... \,, ...• ate 1. ;,� 41 . A. .' ..j • i il.i . • "Visi t'4ik '�', •co'f", µ�ifr�t`e'fr � ••' \ \ \ V&. y .__.. ' 1 II ,>.1 . -, -. • BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT May 25, 1988 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Accord, Inc. PROJECT: Taco Time Corporate Offices ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF 034-88 ; SA 034-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for Site Plan approval to allow the construction of a corporate office building having approximately 12 , 030 square feet (including 92% of office space and 8% as storage) . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the south side of South 2nd Street, and east of Rainier Avenue South. IST ` i --j vim , I N. I 74k •5 t 14Z<,\ I 4efe. ,,..., , s . .. ._.. -T-„,„..., <.,./. •,., i „ _ „ ,, ,t__ . \ n _JI I I I I l F \v \ to_ • ' h. 1 27 \st'�\ p- sr ,- -15 4 3 ..._i { 1_3.,::\ , ' R— . ---i ---� --➢ I \ \ P=: \ (Tl 5fNIOR JUN/OR\ _ t ` ___, e I HIGHNIGHr _ \ = - �! I SC NOOY. SCHOOL ,'•aA 3©i, 1� clb.s.i7 1 � �'Y n—v Stq�' i I1 i , d� S w 2'ri4 3 Sppl_l - �� t 3 �r �\ k.\ \ ill.11111 1 lnl E- ,� -( At 88 <co 0`Rlik R - : - R rRom, � D�� s ��I�-�14 3 Q 0 IPL1* P // K ;6 Ejl. •' y I 11_: ,• ' ', •'' - . • I\ - L '- \ o \\�` -- _ --� • _ `' _ :_ 7r0��t.,tr.r?. 4 rR. a LVI 1.i: 41' I. "QaQ© \ )� \ II •. �-� 1&4 1.1 SPA'\:•'. A;'!:+'` 4 IPA, :-,� ;�.7�=I c.<4. \ \ - \ S `'J n.r 6Q. , Environmental Rev 7 Committee Accord Inc./Taco .icime May 25, 1988 Page 2 B. ISSUES: 1. Whether the applicant has provided sufficient access (ingress/egress) to the property? It is recommended that the applicant provide a revised access plan, including: a) removal of the currently existing driveway mid-way along the west side of the subject property; a proposed new driveway on the west side of the property, at the southern perimeter, provides for safer, more efficient access to all developments on the site, thus,the existing route is not necessary for safe, efficient access to the property. Further the two driveways, as proposed, violate CIty regulations for size and for distance between access routes; b) the provision of truck maneuvering areas at loading ramps which are confined to the subject property. Note: Maneuvering cannot be permitted in the public right-of-way. 2 . Whether the existing storm water system (which does not include on site-detention) is sufficient to handle anticipated run-off from this site? The applicant has not provided a storm water system management plan. A plan is • necessary for the City Public Works Department to determine whether sufficient service systems exist and/or can be made available to serve the site. 3 . Whether the applicant has made sufficient provisions for management of traffic impacts from construction vehicles during the building of the proposed development? It is recommended that a plan be required for management of construction vehicle traffic to minimize impacts upon adjacent roadways. C. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the ERC issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated - with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide a revised access plan which removes: a) the existing driveway on Rainier Avenue, and replaces it with the proposed driveway on the southwest corner of the property. Elimination of one of the proposed driveways is necessary if the development is to conform to regulations for the size, number and location of access routes to the property; the proposed driveway is located at a point which provides for greater efficiency and safety of access to the site; b) redesigns other access routes and maneuvering areas as necessary to ensure Environmental Review Committee Accord Inc./Taco Time May 25, 1988 Page 3 mitigation of traffic impacts to the site and safe passage on the subject property subject to approval by the Public Works Department. 2 . That the applicant provide a storm drainage management plan subject to approval by the Public Works Department. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Environmental: The reviewer commented that any traffic related problems during constructionand an crime prevention measures incorporated into planning (alarm system, exterior lighting, etc. ) . Fire Prevention Bureau: Environmental: No comments submitted. Design Engineering: Environmental: No comments submitted. Traffic Engineering: Environmental: Driveways to be 30 feet in width for two-way entrance and exit usage. If driveways are less than 30 feet as shown, they must be signed for one-way operation at entrance or exit and one- way pavement arrows used to direct traffic. It should be noted 18 ' is required between driveways and also the driveways shall not exceed 40% of the street frontage as it will on Rainier Ave. South as shown. Please resubmit driveway plans. Truck maneuvering for loading ramp must be totally on private property. Trucks cannot use Lake Washington Blvd. for maneuvering. Utility Engineering: Environmental: No utility plans provided. Need more information. Environmental ReI w Committee Accord Inc./Taco Time May 25, 1988 Page 4 Parks and Recreation: Building Division: Environmental: No comments. Zoning Division: Environmental: For public safety, should there be two driveways along Rainier Avenue South? Recommend DNS. Policy Development: Environmental: The existing storm water system in the area was developed without requirements for on-site detention. Storm water may • needretention/detention. Sizing of sy tem may be under what is needed. Project is consistent with Comprehensive 7 p 1 Plan and Zoning Designation. N ; I 0' ,7 CITY OF RENTON . BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director May 25, 1988 Paul Casey, AIA 10116 36th Avenue Ct. , S.W. , Suite 12 Tacoma, Washington 98498 RE: ACCORD, INC. , SITE PLAN APPROVAL - TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES (SA 034-88) Dear Mr. Casey: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project on May 25, 1988. The Committee has decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant shall provide a revised access plan for traffic mitigation which: a) Removes the existing driveway midway along Rainier Avenune, and replaces it with the proposed driveway on the southwest corner of the property. Elimination of one of the proposed driveways is necessary if the development is to conform to regulations for the size, number and location of access routes to the property, as the proposed new driveway is located at a point which provides for greater efficiency and safety of access to the site. . b) Redesigns 'other access routes and on-site maneuvering areaslas necessary to ensure safe passage within property boundaries. 2 . That the applicant shall provide a storm water drainage management plan to ensure protection of neighboring properties from flooding and erosion. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Plans for traffic mitigation and for storm water drainage management are subject to approval by the Public Works Department. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee' s decision. The comment period will end on June 13 , 1988 . Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a ' re-evaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me or Jerry Lind at 235-2550. Fo he E vir n ental Revie ril/- w Committee, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator decnote DKE: lb NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DI TERMI- NATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMIAITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC)has issued a Determination of NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the follow- ing project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursu- ant to WAC 197_11-350. ACCORD, INC. - TACO TIME CORPO- RATE OFFICES Application for site plan approval to•allow the construction of a corporate office build- ing having approximately 12,029 square feet of which 92%will be office and 80/0 as storage. Property located south of South 2nd Street, east of Rainier Avenue South, Public Notice and west of Lake Avenue South if extend- Written comments ecisionlll received after 5:00 be finalized in 15p m., ed, 200 Rainier Avenue South. ECF-034- June 15, 1988, will not be considered. A 88,SA-034-88 fourteen (14) day appeal SHERWIN LISKER, ECONOLUBE & mence followi g thef n period finalization of DNS-M. TUNE,INC. This project is submitted for environmental City oftlRentton'sgationeEnvasureonmentaldRevthe ew review as it is tc be sited in the Aquifer Committee are available at the Bu ding a Protection Area. Tile development is to be and Zoning Department, Municipal I minor rrrepairacenterfoot onnan existing avacting a t 235ing-2550enton, Washington. Phone: lot in an L-1 zone. Property located at 225 Published May 31, 1988 Valley Daily News Sunset Boulevard.ECF-028-88 R5058 Acct.#51067 • • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Audrey 3 e ri n e r ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition .• • ------ ----- Daily newspapers published six(6) times a week.That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. • The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition - , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Notl.CP of 1'nvironrcnta1 Determination was published on - May 31, 1988 R5058 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 30 . 40 Subscribed and sworn to before me this?. 2 n d day of Jun c 19 8 • Not Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTO!N, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. Accord, Inc. - Taco Time Corporate Offices Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a corporate office building having approximately 12, 029 square feet of which 92% will be office and 8% as storage. Property located south of South 2nd Street, east off Rainier Avenue South, and west of Lake Avenue South if extended, 200 Rainier Avenue South. ECF-034-88, SA-034-88 Sherwin Lisker, EconoLube !& Tune, Inc. This project is submitted for environmental review as it is to be sited in the 'Aquifer Protection Area. The development is to be a 2800 square foot tune-up, lubricating & minor repair center on an existing vacant lot in an L-1 zone. Property located at 225 Sunset Boulevard. ECF-028-88 This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5: 00 p.m. , June 15, 1988, will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington. Phone: 235-2550. Published: May 31, 1988 N OT I C E ENVIRONMENTAL • DEcLARATION % . APPLICATION NO. ECF-034-88 , SA-034-88 • APPLICANT ACCORD, INC. -• TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROX. 12 , 029 • SQ. FT. OF WHICH 92% WILL BE OFFICE AND 8% AS STORAGE. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST OF RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDED, 200 RAINIER AVENt SOUTH POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES 1>< DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL Vc. WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE, BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY uuNu xb, 1 88 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF 034-88 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA'034-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for Site Plan approval to allow the construction of a corporate office building having approximately 12,030 square feet (including 92% of office space and 8% as storage). PROPONENT: Accord, Inc. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the south side of South 2nd Street, and east of Rainier Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building & Zoning Department. The Cityof Renton Environmental ental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from May 31, 1988. Any interested piarty may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., June 15, 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mil ll Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: May 25, 1988 EFFECTIVE DATE: May 31, 1988 Gitonald G. Nelson Larry . r Building and Zoning Director Policy Develop nt Direc Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF 034-88 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA 034-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for Site Plan approval to allow the construction of a corporate office building having approximately 12,030 square feet (including 92% of office space and 8% as storage). PROPONENT: Accord, Inc. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the south side of South 2nd Street, and east of Rainier Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building & Zoning Department. The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The (lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from May 31, 1988. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., June 15, 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill' Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: May 25, 1988 EFFECTIVE DATE: May 31, 1988 onald G. Nelson ILarry . r Building and Zoning Director Policy Develop nt Direc Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director • (IRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMIT E AGENDA Malay 25, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 a.m. NEW 1. Sherwin Lisker, EconoLube & Tune, Incl. This project is submitted for environmental review as it is to be sited in the Aquifer Protection Area. The development is to be a 2800 square foot tune-up, lubricating & minor repair center on an existing vacant lot in an L-1 zone. Property located at 225 Sunset Boulevard. ECF-028-88 RECOMMENDATION: DNS-M 2. , J. M. Dalpay, Dalpay Rezone Application for non-project action to rezone 3.02 acres of vacant property from G-1 (General Use) to B-1 (Business Use). Property located on the south side of N.E. Sunset Boulevard, west of Union Avenue. ECF 030-88; R 030-88 RECOMMENDATION: DVS 3. Valley Medical Center, Psychiatric Wing Addition Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of the first story.of an eventual three-story building, a 40-bed psychiatric addition having 24,960 sq. ft. A lower level below could have approximately 3,000 sq. ft. of mechanical/electrical room. Located at Valley Medical Center, 400 South 43rd Street. ECF-027-88; SA-027-88 RECOMMENDATION: DNS 4. City of Renton Public Works Department-I-405 Storm Drain Crossing Application to construct storm drain improvements to improve drainage capacity at the I- 405 culvert near N.E. 44th Street. POperty located north of I-405 at N.E. 44th Street ECF-031-88 RECOMMENDATION: DEFER, PENDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 5. City of Renton, Public Works Department-South Talbot Hill Reservoir and Pipeline Improvements Application to rezone approximately two acres of property from R-1 (Residential Use) and Greenbelt to P-1 (Public Use) and to construct a reservoir and a 16 inch water pipeline. The reservoir will be located on Carr Road, east of Valley Medical Center and south of the Covenant Church Building. The watermain will be installed in Carr Road from Valley Medical Center to 103rd Place S.E. and up the reservoir access road (143rd Place S.E.) ECF 021-88; R 021-88; SA 021-88 RECOMMENDATION: DEFER SITE PLAN, PENDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION; DNS-REZONE Pt P NE • 6. Jeffrey Hillson-Beadex Manufacturing Application to construct a single story 8500 square foot metal warehouse to serve as an addition to an existing single story concrete building of approximately 32,000 square feet. The proposed structure will displace parking places which are to be relocated on the site. Property located at 833 Houser Way North (east of the Boeing Company and west of I- 405). ECF 032-88 RECOMMENDATION: DEFER, PENDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 7. Accord, Inc. - Taco Time Corporate Offices Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a corporate office building having approximately 12,029 square feet of which 92% will be office and 8% as storage. Property located south of South 2nd Street, east of Rainier Avenue South, and west of Lake Avenue South if extended, 2001 Rainier Avenue South. ECF-034-88, SA-034-88 RECOMMENDATION: DNS-M DISCUSSION GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME, OLYMPIA- ECF-015-88 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the .2.s day of , 1988, I d posited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing £I �1• ..h. (i1.4, documents. This information was sent to: NAME: REPRESENTING: azdiA,t , c . .1a4t:046 PasLaa4? • SIGNED BY: a s v ie ► _ SUB'ICP, .�� DB D SWORN to before me this �{, day of 0/ 12-. A�� , 1988 . Q �O ARy u' o oV " 1 Puso �0:zs1 Nota Public in and for the State of Washington, ``��►� residing at ,J%0AJ , therein. Projec tt and Number: a:414d 4i t$ AtP:-. CITY OF RENTON ..�L BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director May 20, 1988 Accord, Inc. • 1911 Maple Valley Highway Renton, WA 98055 RE: Accord, Inc.-Taco Time Corporate Offices South side of South 2nd Street, and east of Rainier Avenue South. ECF 034-88; SA 034-88 Gentlemen: The Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted the above referenced project. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for the Technical Advisory Committee on May 25, 1988, for consideration. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of your project, please contact our office at 235-2550. Sincerely, )14 1.4) Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator pc: Paul Casey 10116 36th Ave. Ct. S.W. Suite 12 Tacoma, WA 98498 accepltr DKE:sr:cs 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 P5. 001 NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: ACCORD, INC. (TACO TIME) ECF-034-88 , SA-034-88 APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 12 , 030 SQ. FT. (INCLUDING 92% OF OFFICE SPACE AND 8% AS STORAGE) . GENERAL LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, AND EAST OF RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH PUBLIC APPROVALS: 1. SITE PLAN APPROVAL 2. BUILDING PERMIT The application can be reviewed at the Bulding and Zoning Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2540. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. Ronald G. Nelson Building & Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, khkR-r • (.r I I\)Q HEREBY CERTIFY THAT `"I 1+11..t� COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME ON 1Y\ c- 2 j - , 19 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEAR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public,An and forth'e State of Washington residing in ot c� //S ep�day of 44,4-1 1 Cl c6 ' \1°,5 ON0 (11 °4 o �OIARy 0.0 Q494e-<1 0,<IJy ' G SIGNED: a,,),Q. 1' LiY,,x o 8, ��` c. • OF WAS'd..%.tl OF RFC U C% © Z 1%1 c3TicE o91T fo SEPTE�OP OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION D ES CR I PTI ® N • l 34-88 • ACCORD, _INC . (TAC88 , CO TIME) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 12 , 030 SQ. FT. (INCLUDING 92% OF OFFICE SPACE AND 8% AS STORAGE) . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, AND EAST OF RAINIER AVE SOUTH PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : 1. SITE PLAN APPROVAL 2. BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ,ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION _":J, BACKGROUND: `1 APPLICANT: Accord, Inc. PROJECT: Taco Time Corporate Offices ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF 034-88 ; SA 034-88 DESCRIPTION OF *PROPOSAL: Application for Site Plan approval to allowlthe construction of a corporate office building having approximately 12, 030 square feet (including 92% of office space and 8% as storage) . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the south side of South 2nd Street, and east o.f Rainier Avenue South. ' • fi tl 1°,21ez \\ ,$. - . . i. r.11- ILI 1 1 Brv_i I sq I S. tG 1N T` 1: I 1. \ ' R- . • .._ I I. . \ _, • , \ 1, ; SENIOR JUNIOR �7 1. 1 I HIGu NIGH - T •I"IV Pi \\ ter— LL%- ,, .•11 I Sa:moot SGNOOr_ 1 - al��,� ` e©9., ,a al ,,,rb s.� = -- - • 2 Mr ; R^ rsE.••5.1' ,' Milftt: .�, .� '0 ` 2e PL Q , E I Z , , 47/iiiiiie-:, y Il eslA,• Yçv 1' 1i � � ii :/...Ili 4., -4,44,40dipp.. ,, 77\ \ .„,..‘" t-i -Am. I , • : • ill,.....ff.... e,&fit . ar . 1 .. . 1 , ., . . ,. . " ,I -•L":,Ti. _14 /4144 R.-.. ' / 'f'\\ Pl- \--. l'‘ . 'a •-•-•--2:—. 7.-1 • , -*L-11'. •'Ii':- — . . ' .2— T. 7 i , 11111 ' __1 \ ‘‘.. V ‹.. . :. . .L...11511. .., > . >9 - ., d ;�-l_ DO' .. '•r /'-' ••+,: \ \I'. Z• \�\av l • ! !� • hem' - D• ' a !!r �1 Aromas a� ,� �'' o \�• I ! -� .. • :;�, +I' Q 1.1 t•:.1:4�:�,45 ;A�,NIv;�A� . • i O�pD �,�0�'I-cc9' -,o �\ ) Hs+ _' ' II'i y4• �21 '. n�'`�h � • 0 - 0 IIr _ p ..... . ��_TALL • --P�� • � .. D '0 p ew_•Y•NE RCLATbN -- < —_ -- -1T-, ,. ?(t ^ ._'"-.:+..' ';; ,_ �� •E ��®� �RNKry arP.oe M 24°BOG °p��11I.��V.A►° f �'�•'��\�O^�a =� 7 J ---- a a a `a e!-G b Rt �' p •r t' , s ,4 _ a'�' °'15) lZ'Z72 'Trnrr�D_ZLTL7SIZ ",,. .ZT f ,, ! !4=� �'i '� --- 7� '''c>4 y .. 7. • ) !t -' - - —R a 'J .l.LCLL1L:lT 111-t1i�:! .� T •.s '�a' 'aA1,: a "iq , 1 G-- 4Ui- ii— — -1 Z M7@. OG : >- /. m r 9ct na..cw-v our rvan 1 d _ 'S , ^6 rFe ro wrvrc. - - . (3Jh - I•fl��l / c7 -T j . C�7 �B ' r 4 I.+w,rra Mucu�i-I�ir — t ... .3�i•711i / 1 _ Y _; �= is 1= , �ee, , I wx'e- 5 1 .I •S• - .7....S, 7� •;MUC 2G'o6. �- I q'..c, 1 ' g.z • o . A'as iti.TOIL,: • , --,',:now,, r'-' ` a L3)RE2 1 1 Iz n�wn�vzw�u i ' t Ca� ,��,i'yy„� .4.,,, •, - - - - 4'��-� 1 1 1 TFu.D r"mr y.•e, �— • - ---.' -- wji4 F '�r:tr, vt7e. Ir�G,w'.wI 1� f < 1 1 I I - - TREE PLANTING DETAIL t (�r;� _ ,nc� �'' lh '14'Q ,ya.i�r` t. 1 , • �Ca.1 V, F`G'.24 Rea r—. pal I 1 C4�ZG ae..aaee=_ee" �"�V'� l ! , I. m_ • nrne•cnwe.sava.0 C�)t2� eo-Fz-me ra�vioH C1)PR 6. . �.a.- G3 RYI I U' ,y°Er -ie nwen o,• e n I MN C GA- Wr . /� G �` C1 ,-YL! ! zC5)Pr' CaJ rzY p�Gf .+, MNCi'1.4'b G. CSJ� C3JGS PI,,,,,-a_ T r6E/ (� 3 t 'r4, -....rul.cr! ._ • -JPP_ I� - ''"'lal-'+i G-CAR'' N�1 c1)- - 1 ! 1 _ A l w°`.43,1r o r..w • t a?r 1)" A. .v Z� C�cB _ a_� c..7 / 1 1 5 d 6 4- . ..-.�ry� t EYCFPLa-solu L(14)IG°Mr'. 37.4.,..1-1.113,1.7.. . i .r,w - ?� ^S. S,USLruwe MrIU� 24°O , I W 1g J iIZSi,aer. r!r-+�eororx� W d:e • �p^L PLANTING PLAN da: SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL 1"=�'-o' Ir0• E" °° 1 s '- "aAA. s.X3RMEDer. .,e".au..R..HI, 0OFTOREANDUNDERTHe,.�.�� °"__2 o _ • OTT. BOTANICAL NAME SEC s Irou� cop cw E. PLANT a CO sees TIONS ON PLAN ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AG ADJACENT To AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO DMAY SHOULD BE LOUTBO To SCR•.•.BLANK.Au SYMBOLS 1REAS. BPg r RED COMMON NAME BERRA PAPYRIFERA PAPER BIRCH a Iv CAL. E. _ q xuecLw. ALANELSG� i / '/\.' Fp, , . ._.._. 3. TREES TO BEPLAN,EDAMMUM.PUT FROM CURB WHERE CARS.LLoreRHANG or CB . u.•_r CAL. 4. DOGRE DISCREPANCY.THE 5 r_„L•_r •• I ._ .... p--... • uiovearTMi a SCHEDULE u FOR THE CONTRACTORS CONVENIENCE,IPTHERE D PC -1PRUNUS CERravea THUNDERCLOUD' r-u=-r`CAL. / /\' '"V\ '• S. AREAS ON SITE TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH MAXIMUM 341 SIDE SLOPES.SEE PLANTING PLANS FOR aR 2 OUeneus RoeuR s"sncuTA•u UPRIGHT eHCLSH OAK :-r -r ro os. HEIGHT AND ._ {.' _:.i:=• - wssTITor,oNor PLANT rARu•Tes ARE:uvecrroAPPROV R ANeseHour ! OWNERMANDSGPE ARCHITER. m .ILEA,Myer hvLau — AHONIA 2 n- S I - AvawxoJer .. L',.'V:.°.,0000 s aE�r moo Tot.B.OR u t S""w'suTUHSe:'DIM,5 G:T�,.e on.W.`g"T"sAcwe 19 _ i - _ - ,i 'S ND . �9 '2 g " _ I' _�� I)1 yu S,p ys, W. ALL PLANTING AREAS TO RECEIVE"u0IuUu r OP APPROVED TOPSOIL. 1G - C. p RS — RHODODENDRON SAPPHIRE. SAPPHIRE RHODO. 3 GAL. 24.0.C. , IE. ALL TREES TO BE T.o< T PER ESRee,L" DOT SHEET II. CONTRACTOR PRECAUTIONS IMPROVEMENTS. : RV 1 LOW HARMER LOWHAMERBO 5..E S THE uCOsurecG"m"eroROVERvmeo VD 2 VIBURNUM DAVIDS p �"'D'sO1L TorWALLSOWNERS SATISFACTttD HD AT No ADDITIONAL CC AND UNDERGROUNO UTILITIES.DAMAGE CAUSED6T. l''l ACITI� " COMMCTOU ee RSP sH,su OO TOIL NSIELC oBTAd """*ouwnc mArroN srsreM AVE POETS La /J1 DOSED.STREET TREES TO REMAIN I I GROIE4DCOVER DETAIL 'GENERAL NOTES PLANT SCHEDULE i T - _ ..... JohnsonBraund design group, inc. architecture,landscape&planning consultants - , . ... . „ • i . ' . ' ••••'• ...................-.. ' . . . , .• ' 0 • (—N, :. , . . . •' . , 331 , . . • 24. • .. . .. 4, • .... . - • ' . • M • • Z 'S1 ' :' ,• : '' , P . 24' ,‘i4. ,2' 11':.; ' •••,•••!, '• . 1 ... ' ' i ''• '•1 •''"1''' I i' .. • Z 3i) ' • a ;• • ED r A,, ' lc • . ...__ „. • / L•;. ,, jj , I° , t• T • E I 4 \ > . .: • X > 1,'s • -' 0,11 i *-.:' , :,,, i',, ,;%.'. ,; ' • :4 W g 1 . Z .• .. . , M 3:1 • ::- ..- .- 0 . s ' 1-,--, 9,k11,t > , _1 Ai...1 1;t":3 n E:: a-,,, i:•• ,.=',......--,,,, ,; ' .•cn • cn . I-- liti-: 1134, is .‘„,,„: i 1 • ', • -.•.- , 0 . ?i,. --- . .. . , . ... M 1 - 1- , ®, i!,I, L .,:,,, ,,, •, ,.. , ... • co - MI , P 1111 I • , : ; ' ;" :1. 1 . : '' 111.1 '• '''' . , tR '-741/ft, 111111 III . * : o 5,C11 ' + (-will 4 pi 1 - •: :. . . . :.4 B/ g --",,E:, g a ",,i'& if— II " • ', ':'',, 7.: • / ------ , $,E I I I I • '', ' ' ''- : • Y." 4 ' ----3 ,_ A 0 I • '' :.-:",.. ,:;', 1,„ 3 ::. .../ 0 • ,. • . 1.1 I LT 1 1 , • ...: . ,, • •-' • • tj I I I . 1- ''', .• ._1 I BE I Project No. TACO TIME OFFICE BUILDING RENTON,WA. MARK A.ANIIERBON.PE.i .. ., , I. • Drawn by. . FOR:ACCORD.INC. • ; Issue Cale Ion mane VALLBY 10011WAY ' 1 ) Latest rev apace.WA.05055 PVONEI MOM 225-0054 1= , 3333',REAL/JAEN DRIVE OW TACOMA. WA ..2. 1200) 221-704. . - 304 MAIN AVENUE SOUTH.SUITE 300 RENTON. WA 05053 12051 135-aeoo J . , '-'114•:.1.;:', ,':•••'';•••.••:•.r...;;;;•;1.:1,.. :. ..: . •• :! ,..!:' 1•...:a1'.....1....;.,:,...}...'..;,ie. " ,.11 Pr:',.. : :.'..'.. ",-0-.'„:1; ',',..';%"."... .'j;!'4'‘ •'',1''••-: •• ''':".,::• ii'..•,. •%J.:: , . :•••:".'-.. ;, ',.i.:r., ...1.:•:::..,;), ,''..,.1•• ,.‘•.:•:;: c•;', .' -:: .:: : ...'7',''.-J'.'..'C.:',•'' ';''.'tti 41;`:!::,",, ;',..; ,... ,..":,. : ., , ,.•::;.,.; ::' ;: „. ,, ,I;,.. „?:: '''..'' '..i. .,..- .i":,;:,;:.;:.i;;;' '' '.•,:;.' .;- ' ' `.. ..e.,'.:,..'!:„: ':,:.;:,i.'',:,,..1.;''..."I'.:.:'...,'...:,'.:•,.. '.^.,:,,,,,t`,..",;.;,,C!,i:,''."'..:', ...P,'.0,:;:41,:"..;:',.,•:".;'i,;:.'1,',......,!,:.-....,!:''..... ,:, .,. '.'i',;, ..:',, ,"'.,:..*:„'; !'',••••••,:/ii • a,5/1/65 CLIEltt RC./...94, , a&V OM&CA"(Re.66.1 r,ogee•rio,,. ___ • ...- - _____.' r, ___ • t ' . 1- ink A% iak "-• ,,,,,A. ...e.- Faal.e.,,,,•1:r.• ns vo u, ,..;-,-:,,,,,. fi.7--, gl t i El. 7,;. 1, • • I ....t..r...4,.aer.-13,.. --..- ----- • 11:1 i '; 6,1f. / MP 1.4•,,,,......F.,VaPtts I ,,,,/ ,•:,..f.s3 ".' ll111..111M1Milliirti...1. i I '. e;;;'."44•4 41 _ ___ 111111M1111, Wrrm ..--= '111.11.• - gliiiiiiiiiIiIIIIIW - II 1 _,. 1. , • • :,.. . ,1---,- ,,,,......,,.....„.. ___ _ ... r- --diffinffigki-.•:;:t=,,„t•-.,..:. ..,. ----...1 ...„. ..,?,_ IT : L......___i . , • : .-_---.- .Iummeozp --- -.--- - .- el...,,,,g..1....bal.:. 5- lr, •1' : ' ,Piate.3....,. 4.,,,,,„---•I: 1=1 1 •1_,LMAIIMI ,ELIIENC•iiacza.4WA 1 ,(,,,,K,„,,,..,junIMIli t -, Zr: , I ...0 ff.e...-•,'?,,'......• nia=1 . -1 • I ...' -,... \, -.- , imimmiiimmeniall II : R. , , , I • 0001010110 KA..., i. 4 S' , , .. jh - 1 " -.! ....3 01,1101/:AaireasIEO n4r.000 § , NORTH ELEVATION ..,i..,..,0,e........-.. --... -- ' F;:1 ,...1,:erc,e, 5, --_—_.— .---:::- , • ,,,,G,...,a,.444 lit..'..-.44....1....s.....,..it.e...,.....41 : • + ' . - 1?----J' - .f.':' - 70-'"- a-.....0.,0r1...71,20 - ,.„.. ff,r_t'7,---ftf,'-..r-'-•-''' 1 'i f — _ .. OFFICE , . QFF10E -_2-5_- 1I gE • I :-":°:-::"'":'''_::.;;;.!,.•'"1..;:z:::-.:!:..:.:',.s7...::,,'-4 t 1 ,-- i 0 10 •,..1:",..... '..."",'"1: - ....1''''' ...'-' LA •.,I 1 ':: tr.7.54 c:.4iVa."10,14. i . _ s (v.cro•.... 1,605)1 ...,...<4,,..ors.j....,.. I:,WED 4......t,, _....- , 1 ,...."--,......, •-. -...-• „. _._, ,.., • t SOUTH ELEVATION 1 Z 1 .: /-1,-.2,..0.,00 4 040[.. f.;Drg°.rsego 6 __ .ITLigigillilli I (4...71 E biel_•,.c.........th. ' 1 ;,'. __________. I ecni.0 POP.R Du V.T*0 1-') 111 .......,Am,rirrifinii1=1=1=11M1=inni (pi V.4 L• g ,' NalErIAIMIIIIIIIIREIMIKIr pl a...7:r.Z..1%,, ,, ! "'..''S.:7'.,P....t.',, 'e, -,,,PIt•e.,.......52.54,.... . I '2'..- f. 25 ; 'i:;,t".164 WI 1.4...131-4,4/4,5W mii___w•— _.... .min—i t 1 .1 i '- • '.es...1 ea i fee e.,.•,•••••,c :. ,-Atok,. ,.... ., A ' M..-01.; —7, ,, - , _ / / ...... .5) I I ''..7 ''---.-"''''•'`-`, 1-;•--.21 ,-- , vz af. V , ' ii" 2.6 F.61.14:11Y9 1 .. ..-- I: 1111 '''(E) • F, . 11122111111111111m31.-1 2 '_;',' 1 g ----- • -" TL__H__, . ! _ 1 . own an....e,•.....• / 4 4,....,t-r) I c.,ruszur,...Wren • t , •„,,,,.., ..4 _______. I 0 ii a g i• _ ,. . . ,• , , V,...e.,o.441.4",,/ • ' //- examorimrszwzm _rL ..., \ \ ' i 707‘..r`ro'r IT'" 7"-F,„•,--, ,.',..'•.-7e•,_ --,,,,,....NI.4......,9”....7/1.L..1/ :-':;.., ''''f.-...::.::......, :: MI.,ay M1.4E,e,..eel7 e urAllot, WEST ELEVATION ° ii. E •.--_,,,,-...,,,,,,,,,.;.... , • . I • ,....„--,.....—,,•., !.1- .:••:=-.,,, ,.,-..-„2-:;::f....,-,,,:::-.,;-.- -: . —, --- e.A.rr. ii. h-- ... .t.1.--:,,.--;:-...,, ....,..:...(...,-.....-1-_ . „ . ... ... 4.1i-r---.! ,r7 111111111 ' , 1 ..,, ..,........ ,„:.....,,......-..7,, Zi.; -ty. ......G ; ''ZION •-',V..;;;a t,........g. I .i , ' .„..a." 7 ,...„. /— . ® © '! i _ Tg --. ---&'—vim s= , mililr_rea7373-1111 1151111- 11111 :..,',,;-.7"" ,- int . - -0 14,1- _ ______ *- —-'s ,..„..N EEL, wrim ..... ...— ..-- ,.„....,•_.,. v...A..,.. 1 1 - EAST Ell""Ml,M ...-0.4,L.,-•,-,....,-........., , . \PRofV2r," L11.10 •-A5L DTI.V.* r . ,,. 1 ..... ' S d ON AT SOUTH WALL - WAL -•TION •T WI DOWS (DTYPICAL WINDOW DETAILS 62.1.0 Cru•So..... 1 Mr •I- A4 1,,•I...." , ------ -----=------- - - ---________ MARK A. ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES Structure/ Engineering Cense/tants AnL ] .r... NI.Y1 ....... J ..- ' • '••••'••,::''.4.".•.-•;:•:'-:••.'.' : l••'''i:•72:4•4ji='••1".••.;....': • . .. . : . . " , " :• 2-. ,.. • , , , . _. . • . . ' 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: S Reciie�7\lsr• DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 5, 1988 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 17 , 1988 EFC - 034 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S). :_ SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: TACO TIME CORPORATE •OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPRnVAT. Tn-ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVTNG APPRnX 12 , 029 SQ. FT. OF WHICH 92% WILL BF. QFFTr.F. AND 87 AS STORAGE . LOCATION: LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH'I 2nd STREET, FAST nF RATNTF,R AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IFIEYTENnFn, 9n0 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: . 96 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 12, 029 SO. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: ca-0je a� 14%/:4or e veleo .1774* fat.e/ci 6e /-ep4ce, 'fit/4 u/P a�/e aa71-(4G e1.1/Ue /'cGe-‘r4 );oaw-,/ (od /Adialomy crrY of RE°T0� Lvov a 19u( BUILDING / 70MtNG DEPT. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional ' forma 'on is needed to properly assess this proposal. /?, /filfr Sign r o Direct r or Authorized Representative Date � � • e RENT(... BUILDING 88 ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET EC F - 034 _ 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 PROPONENT : ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE : TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON STRUCTION OF A CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 12,029 SQUARE FEET OF WHICH 92% WILL BE OFFICE AND 8% AS STORAGE, LOCATION : LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST OF RAINIER, AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDED, 200 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. TO: n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 5/25/88 LI ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ILPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 111 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON MAY 17, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : //4i. / ./4fIC/P642 o'er ❑ APPROVED W APPROVED WITIH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED We/we e,e/efii V e ,eeis 4eieti- Aif A- /44tei/(q .0,_ a,76/ 'd//(/e /'60ClC4747-v - Toile CITY OF RENTON MAY 2 5 1988 BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. DATE: Way C ? / � (/ / Lj SIGNAT OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 r '• RENT___ BUILDING & ZONING DEPL_-__ MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 034 _ 88 APPLICATION NO(S) ; SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 PROPONENT : ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE : TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON STRUCTION OF A CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 12,029 SQUARE FEET.•OF WHICH 92% WIL'L BE OFFICE AND 8.% AS STORAGE, LOCATION : LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST OF RAINIER, AVENUE SOUTH, AND -WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDED, 200 RAINIEIR AVENUE SOUTH. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 5/25/88 DENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION . SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT '/BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT FlPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P ,M, ON MAY 17, 1988 II , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7O1di1U( n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED THE tutw 12L.Z46). tS PRouiOiNG 17 PARK A.)6 S�M.L A 0 Tft.tkt. ART t t OOr ioNat 57 ,La On) '- , (tprc.Li+ve R.a.w ( Taira. cc 7 o New , Z 7 PNR.Kiau6 S'laLL-5 Pct1,E ©'►'J W crt+ NCdt) teov.isolowiErsyr, MGOWiVviM 'fRI T Tlh E3•.1571106 wEsTtito IMOSY Datu8kAV4 13Ps►ZKIrv6 S` 11WS RESTAMRAwl e:p's EurviiNkTED Noo 1 sit.A , 1160 f ^ 09 VWD SGAcp Jv6 1 pz,00060 lb Fou..oto DE516 N cF 1` w VC)"( • OUT 00 d 2 S�;=cr (�RLI� 104r Oit%6 ( DtSagsk. JfL4k ) Nhyo "Lm1.IJT'1N C, 12estAUL RI )1 DATE: 5 /9-156 SIGNATURE OF DI TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENTL. BUILDING & ZONING DEPA.. . MENTP C ®N DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVI/24 gitgrtrfo, n, 034 _ 88 i� � ECF — 11.7 MAY 5 1988 If APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 PROPONENT : ACCORD, INC. E t 1 u U EL PROJECT TITLE : TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON STRUCTION OF A CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 12,029 SQUARE FEET OF WHICH 92% WIL•L BE OFFICE AND 8% AS STORAGE. LOCATION : LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST OF RAINIER. AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDED, 200 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 5/25/88 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU EI PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT EkOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 110THERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M, ON MAY 17, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : fUAIc..y 1 MAPPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS LINOT APPROVED * � DATE: SIGNATUR 'IF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 / w o F RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPART'nicNT 0#0 %. REVIEW S 404, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ,� -% 6S, cPcp ote ECF - 034 _ 88 (iO APPLICATION NO(S) ; SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 to • PROPONENT ; ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE ; TACO TIME.CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN.APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON STRUCTION OF A CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 12,029 SQUARE FEET OF WHICH 92% WILL BE OFFICE AND 81 AS STORAGE. LOCATION : LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST OF RAINIER, AVENUE SOUTH, AND -WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDED, 200 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. TO : ri PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 5/25/88 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION ISTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION . n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT [-] POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 111 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIiS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P ,M, ON MAY 17, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ❑ APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Driveways to be 30 feet in width for two-way entrance and exit usage. If driveways are less than 30 feet as shown, they must be signed for one-way operation at entrance or exit and one-way pavement arrows used to direct traffic. It should be noted 18' is required between1 driveways and also the driveways shall not exceed 40% of the street frontage as it will on Rainier Ave. South as shown. �► Please resubmit driveway plans. Truck maneuvering for loading ramp must be totally on private property. Trucks cannot use Lake Washington Blvd. for maneuvering. DATE : -� l/ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHOR Z D REPRESENTATIVE d ) REVISION 5/1982 r/\ P4$ RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPA.. MENT 0 Giro' +ma)- `�� oti DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHT-1, 034 _ 88 ECF - 40 � APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 'tj. PROPONENT : ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE : TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF A CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 12,029 SQUARE FEET OF WHICH 92% WILL BE OFFICE AND 81 AS STORAGE. LOCATION : LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST OF RAINIER. AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDED, 200 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 5/25/88 ENGINEERING DIVISION E] TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION . SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT IKPOLICE DEPARTMENT t POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Ei OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON MAY 17, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED Ell APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENTON BUILDING ! ZONING DEPAR1'maNT dc° C/PY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEWSH c,4%tvpo %„fr.gyow l ,t(t. ECF - 034 _ 88 4%0 88 0 �A4, APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 Ce PROPONENT : ACCORD, INC. Apr PROJECT TITLE : TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN.APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON STRUCTION OF A CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 12,029 SQUARE FEET ,OF WHICH 92% WILL BE OFFICE AND 8% AS STORAGE. • LOCATION : LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST OF RAINIER, AVENUE SOUTH, AND-WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDED, 200 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 5/25/88 DENGINEERING DIVISION • OTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 00THERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P ,M, ON MAY 17, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : firei prevein-Iio.v\ n APPROVED ?J APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall compiy with currant Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. • )epartn )t access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' .6".. Yes No, Preliminary fire flow caif:ufation shr3w a firs flow of ._-. .2/37 G,°m is required. ilycirafits with a minimum flow of /ooO • gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is requited to be. within , /50 feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within ,, 3 0o feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is requirk!d to protect the total structure. Yes �o All fire department access roads are to be paved installed prior to construction. Yes All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes A! ,(04; i7/11 ,rs, DATE: (a 4 /71/9 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENT .. BUILDING & ZONING DEPASLNTt 150 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW L ,Tv' �® ECF _ 034 _ 88 ZCIst� 14;e$ APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 �� PROPONENT : ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE : TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON STRUCTION OF A CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 12,029 SQUARE FEET OF WHICH 92% WILL BE OFFICE AND 81 AS STORAGE, LOCATION : LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST OF RAINIER.AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH. IF EXTENDED, 200 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 5/25/88 RENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT [1] .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON MAY 17, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS PINOT APPROVED p' 3) pr ,2-c zzx354 doc DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -2.._.cAl►nq DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 5, 1988 0 . COMMENTS DUE: NUN 17 , 1988 EFC - 034 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAT. TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPR{lg 12 , 029 SQ. FT. OF WHICH 92% WILL RE OFFTCY Apin 87 AS STORAGE . LOCATION: LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, FAST OF RAINTER AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDED, 900 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: . 96 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 12, 029 SO. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: R. Lt Udi C U ILO -6 BA MilAkthil5 Akl.,O10 6 R NO Id It Nvt U . S, ,c.Orn tvl e Di.). We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. eAAA D T.. lam ,.d 5- 19- 8 Signature of ctor or Authorized Representative Date RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPAR1 mCN DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW ati ECF - 034 _ 88 4, c APPLICATION NO(S) ; SITE PLAN APPROVAL: I SA-034-88 0 PROPONENT : ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE : TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON STRUCTION OF A CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 12,029 SQUARE FEET OF WHICH 92% WIL'L BE OFFICE AND 8% AS STORAGE, LOCATION ; LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST OF RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDED, 200 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 5/25/88 ❑ ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT (BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON MAY 17, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ?CD n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED /27 0 6, c-docZ— 1 J M i c® AZ W r 1-1-'3 o— DATE; (S '7/ SIGNATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTH RIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 • A 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET (. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: t Qi< DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 5, 1988 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 17 , 1 -�� 1$‘ EFC - 034 - 88 0Q APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 �A PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAT. TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING NAVTNG APPRf1X 12, 029 SQ. FT. OF WHICH 92% WILL BE OFFT1.E .AND 87 AS STORAGE. LOCATION: LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET EAST nF RATNTFB AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDET), 7n0 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: . 96 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 12, 029 SO. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline. Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identifie areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed t operly assess this proposal. L5 J//-2 Signat f Director or Authorized Representative Date cr40 49G c14' '`o �9y �� ti 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 4 ,1� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: U-I;I dh A /3) (4` DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 5, 1988 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 17 , 1988 /1, EFC - 034 - 88 aFq APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: TACO TINE CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPRnVAT. Tn ALT OW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDTNG HAVTNG APPPDX 12 , 029 SQ. FT. OF WHICH 92% WILL BE OFFTI.F. AND 87 AS STORAGE . LOCATION: LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTHI 2nd STREET, EAST OF RATNTFg AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IFiEXTENDFD, 7n0 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: . 96 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 12, 029 SO. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline. Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation �f 15) Public Services 16) Utilities 7 COMMENTS: Apv, ada9 prettael"--- I' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is nerd to properly assess this proposal. 8/el Signature of Director 4 Authorized Representative Date 0 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �4. •q �4.4. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: rcc err Is & /4i MAY 5 l 8 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 17 , - 8 �, DATE CIRCULATED: 9 9� ,40 6 EFC - 034 - 88 POLICY DEVELOPMENT �[tTMt APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 CITY OFRE'VTONVVO MAY 5 1988 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. L �a ' 2l� PROJECT TITLE: TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES II it ! Q V I BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE FLAN APPROVAT. Tn AT.TfW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVTNG APPROX 12, 029 SQ. FT. OF WHICH 927 WILL BE OFFTf'F. AND 87 AS STORAGE . LOCATION: LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST OF RATNTEB AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENIFD, 9n0 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: . 96 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 12, 029 SO. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline. Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services X 16) Utilities COMMENTS: The 2.Xislln5 $r4vrm LA)a;ie.r '61S-ie.r+rl t;, --r ie. a.ree.. 600.6 deutl.op i w►- aw4- wecd u.i,temerAs -Pnr uvn-sk, cleAe,rvit.ax. $-61-e .de-r W-4.�.1 e rum re.3,er,.-,Levt./ cle.k,.A.L-vt . Dse. .a.., o f sis ke.+-►-1 ,,A-9-4-1 Viet u..t.der -L -is ►teed. Pro-tex-4- is covLSIS.640k-k• 2.- Cow.12.,ua. sa,-4... Plek,- ii. -2-evit 'cba-6•,:bi&AA4r.. , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info mation is needed to properly assess this proposal. additional ::: �.�-E1 vim-/3 - ?�?3 Signaturq�o'P Director or Authorized Representative Date ':': cry Jim 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 4Gp �A ,c� y„U REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1YFk ic. ,l DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 5, 1988 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 1914.%,19tdVa, EFC 034 8 ti APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC . PROJECT TITLE: TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAT. TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVTNG APPRnY 12 , 029 SQ. FT. OF WHICH 92% WILL BE (FFTr.F. AND 87 AS STORAGE. LOCATION: LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST nF RATNTER AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EYTENT)F.D, 9n0 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: . 96 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 12, 029 SO. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air t_- 3) Water /�- 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources !/ 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline. Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare C� 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation (� 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: Driveways to be 30 feet in width for two-way entrance and exit usage. If driveways are less than 30 feet as shown, they must be signed for one-way operation at entrance or exit and one-way pavement arrows used to direct traffic. It should be noted 18' is required between driveways and also the driveways shall not exceed 40% of the street frontage as it will on Rainier Ave. South as shown. Please resubmit driveway plans. At ``' Truck maneuvering for loading ramp must be totally on private property. Trucks cannot use Lake Washington Blvd. for maneuvering. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. &LI; Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ISO(' 44 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 4)c�',j, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: f \ic€ Q a1 A!i DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 5, 1988 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 17 , ` 86 Ab EFC - 034 - 88 � ‘'-19 '1e$ APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 ®� PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. AA PROJECT TITLE: TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAT. TO ATT.OW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVTNn ApPRnx 12, 029 SQ. FT. OF WHICH 92% WILL BF OFFTOF AND 87 AS STORAGE . LOCATION:_ LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST nF RATNTEP AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDED, 9np RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: . 96 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 12, 029 SO. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline. Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities. COMMENTS: 01,1 Police. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional ' format' is needed to properly assess this proposal. j //e1/14C Signa e of Director or Authorized Representative Date 406 nie;Was-4%4/4'P% , 0 4%,0 2149N J ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �c/<.0 z98( REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: e2de#1 nM DAWITculTEIHylY 5, 1988 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 17 , 1988 O4 EFchv,�.34 - A 8 r. APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAT. TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING NAVTNG APPPDX 12, 029 SQ. FT. OF WHICH 92% WTT,T, BE OFFTC'.F. ANn R7 AS STORAGE . LOCATION: LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST nF RATNIFR AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDFT, 2np RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: . 96 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 12, 029 SO. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /o 7 /ft? Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date r / /A/142./ greef.- f,': , �, t RI QU I RID FIRE FLOI! CI LCI ILAT I ONS :,i .em u , 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION a 1FAI NAME / //eo -T,Iu)E o {24cg 5u//e N( 0e� U.B.C. CLASS ► U1Lei jAi ADDRESS f4/0/02o iin {E 9 :To �?iv,a, S'71,efEve• FIRE MGMT AR(AI ^//t20" 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - 1I IV III V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD FRAME (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW)D 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA; y07,. FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: 2 11/8.h... . TOTAL BUILDING AREA: i2v0R 5 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): 3Com GPM CB) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: - 750 IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B)PM CC) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF 8+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) 2 ZSO GPM (p) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: 74.2.5 GPM (E) CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH ..20(0 ADD 0 % 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST o ADD Jo % 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH •61 -100 10% MAX. WEST ADD % 101 1 -10 ADD___La 1 -1OR WALL 5oa MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : yj % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJUSTMENT: /6/,2 •S GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: ,vier-r,L (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: GPM (G) (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,C.W GPM) zzso (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: Z7--Z-,i6 GPM (H) ,1. SIGNED: ,Z� �� I-ATE �. 17 /,;(9S 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �G` 0 eke, DEPARTMENT: �11 ►r,e�rirvl 40�y j' ® '�O DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 5, 1988 t1 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 17 , 98ac ej ' EFC - 034 - 88 % �d , sr APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. O� PROJECT TITLE: TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAT. TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVTNG APPROY 12 , 029 SQ. FT. OF WHICH 92% WILL BE OFFTC.F. AND 87 AS STORAGE . LOCATION: LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST OF RATNTER AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDFn n00 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: . 96 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 12, 029 SO. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air ✓ 3) Water ✓ 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources ✓ 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use ✓ 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation ✓ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation �✓ 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informati n is needed to properly assess this proposal. �S S Signature of re tor or A4thor zed Representative Date RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPP 'MENT Q. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW t L 1 �®tiro, 034 _ 88 le d ,t) ECF - APPLICATION NO(S) ; SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 4,6 0r PROPONENT : ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE : TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON STRUCTION OF A CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 12,029 SQUARE FEET OF WHICH 92% WIL•L BE OFFICE AND 8% AS STORAGE, LOCATION : LOCATED : SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST OF RAINIER, AVENUE SOUTH, AND -WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDED, 200 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 5/25/88 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION ' n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 11 UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I ( PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT I ( BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT I ( POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON MAY 17, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : �}T/L/Ty t/1'6 n APPROVED I ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS iOT APPROVED )1,e44 [UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECTA LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-d1G.T cR �(p LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-SECJER No SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CRAKE-V"J:TTER yES •D¢ D. �T x 2//T 4_ $0-/i7 �Z SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER, )/,e5. ?9• D¢ Co. X // =y `85 7• /z SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA C:::4GE-WATER Ain SPECIAL.ASSESSMENT AREA CEAr,2E-SEWER NO APPROVED WATER PLAN YES- 'AMMO SEWER PLAN Aftj AP ZOJE®FIRE HYDRANT LOCATifiiES . 8Y FIRE DEPT. vR 5® �11� j.� .air :]f nLYSIS ,No �? • �, DATE : � 4v /32? SIGNATURE OF DIR CTO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE .51/4.-grds44 • REVISION 5/1982 ;_, �f o (7TTY OF RENTO' FILE NO(S) SA 6Y4--65 B......-DING & ZONING DEPARTM�®.T - o -- , ♦ •6 cm, ♦ NA ‘4*‘NrC) MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) NAME APPLICANT rTYPE OF APPLICATION , Gov-O l tic.. FEES REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS l 1 I-,t n L \ rttic L�.e.,/ 4 W--1" ' SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* gcr 1 C , 0 i Ui JL 98)06 COQfD1TI0NAL USE PERMIT* i�G {v /T 1 ✓ i SITE PLAN APPROVAL TELEP E 1 6n SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL ��J �"2l,,`� `-"� � No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON : Q • VARIANCE* From Section: * Justification Required NAME 'VAdi L Gett- S-( 4 . ADDRESS /j.,� ! SUBDIVISIONS: , d I( ✓1 ±h V G . c . �✓` I ' Q SHORT PLAT CITY �tL t ' 0.. ZIPIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT TELEP E � M A I C,J �fc�4q PJ Q PRELIMINARY PLAT , n/�� y/( C� FINAL PLAT (2 c(4) 5484 -W.U' 7 0 WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME 4 1 PLAT NAME: ADDIRESSr lS A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: \ l I -(ArPL V p.U EY- t-c A 1 Q PRELIMINARY • CITY ZIP. 0 1 1► �. 1 ` -lJ�A' FINAL TELEP NE ` P.U.D. NAME: /CCO) 2/.6) — �OeQ Residential Q Industrial Commercial Q Mixed LOCATION '` MOBILE HOME PARKS: , PROAERTYADDRESS ,, 11 11 11 TENTATIVE ED w,`� g�' N(�� V� PRELIMINARY EXISTING ,U,SE� %� p PRESENT ZONING L Y V C��f�C4" 1 / Ge U`Vt L. -` 1 FINAL ,1. PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: • '< c3;�"'i ;. T I G� W,AC {�C. ✓ = NUMBER OF SITACES'� s ,-, .ENVIRO fENTA �t yW'CU41MIT'TEE . r ri. SQ. FT , ACRES % • ,. s� AREA: /�� q �'`` TOTAL FEES CI* OF REMON DATE FE C F USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING A APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: 0,f16 APR 2 91988 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: d v 0 Accepted SUILDING ZONING DEP_`T': 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) DATE ROUTED Q�( ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: l5 u v APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 0 Accepted 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: Building Ni Design Eng. 0 Fire A Parks Police CM Policy Dev. 51 Traffic Eng. gd Utilities REVISED 1-31-84 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). I . I.. AFFIDAVIT e13I, 0 i . G -�j , being duly sworn, declare that I am [authorized representative to act for the property owner,E)owner of the property'involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and.answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. R SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF I. 19 ILA NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT 5 l( 530c,S� 'le�il�i��'` (JCJ�.y (Name: of Ndtar�� 'ublic) (Signature of Owner) G (_ S CA s� S� �t t4.11 Pk(LPL. \10.A.L.5` " ' (Address) (Address) ig E kS Coto t�JA (City) (State) (Zip) (.20G) 22e_e --Coe o (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." i f Form #174 - Legal description of property (if more space Is required, attach a separate sheet). • AFFIDAVIT PA u I, ..., being• duly sworn, declare that 1 am En authorized representative_ to act for the property owner,Downer of the(property:Involved'- . in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY . OF 19 87. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, • . RESIDING AT • (Name of Nctary Public) (Signatur ner) 5(_ t .S 301 . '& (Address) (Address) -cam w A q&-0s5 (City) (State) (Zip) (41).67) C,6 S6, (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed In the "Application Procedure." C1T`r' O t .\7 oN f [ISITE APPROVAL JUSTIFICATION !_ _ 1 �., 2 TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES ; ,ilei-J 91988 RENTON, WASHINGTON '-U.i_✓:..f L7/ZUiVllvv vLC-T. COMPREI-IENSIVE PLAN This subject site is zoned B-1 which will allow any L-1 (warehouse ) use per 4-748 , D . 2 titled "less restricted uses" . COMMUNITY NEED The Taco Time business has long been established as a thriving business in the city . The subject site is situated in the middle of a major commercial center , and is served by 2nd Avenue and Rainier Avenue South which are quite capable of providing vehicular support without adverse impact upon them. The subject site is adjacent to a Safeway store which has operated successfully for years , our proposed use will generate far less traffic than Safeway . EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES 1 . Lot coverage - The site is• covered by ( 2) buildings, ( 1 ) the proposed office/warehouse building ( 12 , 029 sq . ft . ) and ( 2) and existing Taco Time Restaurant ( 2 , 690 sq. ft . ) and the balance is parking or planting . 2 . Yards - All required yards are maintained . 3 . Height - The proposed building is .29 '-0" which is well under the height limit of the B-1• zoning (95 feet) and in character with an existing mix of one and two story buildings in the area . COMPATIBILITY The building is 92% office (allowed outright in a B-1 zoning) and only 8% warehouse which will cause it to stay in character with its neighbors . PARKING The proposed building requires 26 stalls and 7 stalls are provided with full .landscaping . �— (-- TRAFFIC Due to the high amount of commercial use in the vicinity the streets are accepable of handling the proposed project . NOISE , GLARE The parking lot is partially screened by a 24" high berm and landscaping . The loading/unloading area is situated to the side to reduce its impact . LANDSCAPING Fully landscaped , please see Landscape Plan . • OF J 11 � ECF: I•t 034-45 ;+ - City of Renton a3 �9qr 0�Q ENVIRONMENTAL CHgClKLI T- py fp sEPTE" r: Purpose of Checklist: MOO 'r I 'v' � U i i A�•I The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPAL chapter 43,21 C RC1 ;`"requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from y ,t proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. •Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions'if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: /c.cGP/ r�G' 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact.person: 13k0L. ceiveY tot4 A !o I l (® v.0`1-11 AktE 12— 4. Date checklist prepared: 4/2e/0e S. Agency requesting checklist: 6. Propossedd timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 7. Do you have any plar or future additions, expansions, or 'rther activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. NI 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. OGq 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 7 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. • ("Al911\16 PP2Mir itge 0.1 T • 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. A V� ®2.� Z. pr. i c�(9� �� )/w i�a�� C 3 7;)) ,i. wk�o wAE4& WILL )192U6 -rki -- /; T� 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. T TNT C 2 Nn , AQJAG-NY r , ,X l c i N-- - c o "rl A • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example. caly, sand. gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. 6. t7F , flu.0 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so;describe. No - 2 - e. Describe the irpose, type, and approximate qua :ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. & {f1 t- ' (J UO(N(& • f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. r g IN PA N G c x V iloN -r w l�L 14,s- I 611,1 - sr g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the • earth, if any: Gd\1 f - NG G IMpCz- IN r%1 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate�► quantities if known. a l' b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? ifIckiTC2 T? c FFI(A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Kai 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 0 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 1\10•It • - 3 - 4) Will the prop ,1 require surface water withdraw or diversions? Give general descrip,.ton, purpose, and approximately qua—Ales if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so. note location on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. Ra 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from • septic tanks or other sources, if any (far example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems. the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. 1\10 c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.- 'C��1 W .. -CO n -i4 'his lr\ „Ler N 7 p(Lfl7 ar-f WAS -re�'1 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. )\1P - 4 - d. Proposed me res to reduce or control surface, und, and runoff water impacts, if any: kAilMt2 • 4. Plants a. Check or circle typ:: : egetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: •ld: , maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other o Sh • • gras - o 'p or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: ) ,� )Fttl<1\) S. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: • Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other • b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. i\t140. • c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. - S - d. Proposed meat s to preserve or enhance wildlife, i iy: 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manu�fTacctturingf,, etc. 14 ?i6F b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 1'1 1147 ,Cri al G ouie2 , 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could • occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1\1- 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. i-fe56-Pest. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: (� b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? • - 6 - 2) What types a. evals of noise would be created b r associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis ,ror example: traffic. construction. operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. t/1\1 o1 , 1Pf6f4 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Nat\I 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? -(fro 1/2 of 0TH 12 �/2 WrA, ti b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Iv 2 c. Describe any structures on the site. ( ue-7t-D Az7 1 c Go 'f l�✓1 1 WT �U'o d. Will any structures be demolished? If so. what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? 422 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? " g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of thee`site? ►V v1 v h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. t\ir i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 25 j. , Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Nt�1� - 7 - 1. Proposed meat )s to ensure the proposal is comp' 'le with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 14 ( ft1.1W L[2.12-01)1•JPINI-b 19zoF012--1-15 LAC 1 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided. if any? Indicate whet r high. middle, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units. if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: (.7 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. -6! b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? H c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: I' 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? ?A1N >c1 N&RT . b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? 1419 c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? • ld " d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 0 - 8 - • 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. D c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: P 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, gene1\162 ally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NcW c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: D 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 4 �1ri g b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transi stop? c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 47 p 0 l.l M ItJ r P d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). V'i rrer Liexrs S c-,c=. _ 9 - e. Will the projo •Jse (or occur in the immediate viL ty of) water, rail, or air transportat,.,n? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 00 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. •b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. r 16. Utilities o a. • = u ' ' .. - tly • -' .- • e +aTa ' e: =lectricit atural gas, p efuse service = ephone, r' itary sewer se• '- • em, er. b. Describe the utilities that. are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. l /11 C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any • declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on • my part. - Proponent: 94(1^..".) - Name Printed: EAU L. 1 C EY- - 10 - 411'7C 11_Q_Qd D. SUPPLEMENTAL SF .T FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? • Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: - 11 - • 5. How would the pros 31 be likely to affect land and ,reline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: • • - 12 - • • • • CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN r. H H "FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY" " " PROJECT TITLE: • TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES • APPLICANT: ACCORD, INCORPORATED ' • APPLICATION NUMBER: SITE. RL•AN APPROVAL: SA-Q3a-88 '• • The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site' plan application shall be sent to those individuals as proscribed by Ronton City Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No, 1620 relating to silo plan approval. • ASSESSOR'S N• AME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • Pete B. Delaurenti 216 Rainier Ave. So . 182305-9076 Renton, Wa 98055 722950-0090 Renton Property Ventures 933 Jazman Circle 182305-9273 (Pizza Hut ) Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Renton Property Ventures 933 Jazman Circle 182305-9213 (Pizza Hut ) Costa Mesa , CA 92626 Denny ' s Incorporated P.O.' Box 605 182305-9067 ' ' La Mirada , CA 90637 Lawrence J. Warren 7906 S. 116th 182305-9236 Seattle, WA 98178 Boyden S. Russel 528 "A" St . .N.E. 000720-0072 Auburn, Wa 98002 The Estate of Eileen Coleman 100 S. 2nd St . 000720-0211 C/O Warren & Kellogg Atty ' s Renton,-,WA 98055 (Safeway) • • I; .!I f ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • • • , • • • • • ; . , • • • CERTIFICATION [~.thereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their add esse were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at P. N i W , OP on the yr& day of L�r c'mee.42. . t 9 f 7 v_ tus«�c/('/.. ,,e�4. 4... SICNE I IAti. 1! CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I. 3CRR') T. Li i..ifl , hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on tYlfiy 25, I GIFIE) , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington l residing at Ni o ni on the StA day of MA y kqgC‘ iii5 C:.(3..''... �':'+b" • �'1 SIGNED: IJ �Gcie so A `v ` ' � �--1 OFWA' I,i> i,1 FORM 2p8 M r. 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 5 , 1988 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 17 , 1988 EFC - 034 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAT. TO AT.T OW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING NAVTNO APPRnX 12, 029 SQ. FT. OF WHICH 92% WILL BE OFFT('.F. AND 87 AS STORAGE . LOCATION: LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, FAST OF RATNTER AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTFNnFn, 7n0 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: . 96 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 12, 029 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1 i Form 4 RENTc4)BUILDING & ZONING DEPAOMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 034 _ 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 PROPONENT : ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE : TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF A CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 12,029 SQUARE FEET OF WHICH 92% WILL BE OFFICE AND 8% AS STORAGE. LOCATION : LOCATED ~_.:. SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST OF RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH, AND-WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDED, 200 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 5/25/88 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON MAY 17, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED [1] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED G DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 �.. ,Q) °P00)./. 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET GQ�' fe (71 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: puion MAY 5988 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 17 , 1 : DATE CIRCULATED: + 9 EFC - 034 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAT.: SA-034-88 vAto PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAT. TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVTNG APPRn$_ 12 , 029 SQ. FT. OF WHICH 92% WILL BF (FFTCE.. AND 8 '. AS STORAGE . LOCATION: LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST nF RATNTEB AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDED, 7n0 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: . 96 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 12, 029 SO. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline. Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identifie areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed t operly assess this proposal. //—) Signat of Director or Authorized Representative Date nck 11/ '42149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 4. ,/� '1' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: U ;I� h /O� "°161 fib" DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 5, 1988 ' COMMENTS DUE: MAY 17 , 1988 /y . � EFC - 034 - 88 o Fq APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAT.: SA-034-88 3' PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION' FOR SITE PLAN APPRnVAT. TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION • OF AN CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVTNa APPROX. 12 , 029 SQ. FT. OF WHICH 92% WILL BE nFFTrF AND 87 Ag STORAGE . LOCATION: LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST nF RATNTFB AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDFD, 7n0 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: . 96 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 12, 029 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shgreline. Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities _ 2 COMMENTS: ilk • W praviA:A— fP 1A We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where . additional information is ne d to properly assess this proposal. C/3011 q , o/rr Signature of Director Authorized Representative Date diS y �CL 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �(I COI 9` �� M REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ?b\tc `P t Se�nf'�YY 1. 1 p: MAY 5, 1988' COMMENTS DUE: MAY 17 ,r',�8 �� :6446 DATE CIRCULATE p �8�Q EFC - 034 - 88• POLICY DEVELOPMENT TMlr�i CITY OF RENT'0� APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAT.: SA-034-88 O PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. D , MAY 5 1988. PROJECT TITLE: TACO TINE CORPORATE OFFICES I 'IF (t E ll V E BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPRnVAT. TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVTNn APPRP$_ 12, 029 SQ. FT. OF WHICH 92% WILL BE OFFTCF. AND 87. AS STORAGE. LOCATION: LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST lF RATNTFR AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EYTENDFn, 900 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: . 96 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 12, 029 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT ' IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shgreline. Use. 9) Housing . 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recr.eation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services X 16) Utilities COMMENTS: ilie ,exts4in5 sr or►,n ,,0€ Ier s.151er+' ik -µ,e, o-re.w. �o..s fieve..Lope4 wf-k iow4- beer. Ar r oft-sik, oleseralt ax.• S-�•'rn t Le.r vo-et. vu..�1 re.de.n..4-Zavt/ d e-{e.,�- .,1. . GSi z►r..c4 a-(2 g%.`s e.+-+-1 ^'L°A') tat t c.,4.der L^-54k1-is ►n ceded. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info mation is needed to properly assess this proposal. -e�, S-/3 - ?g Signaturo Director or Authorized Representative Date IS4V>i>c, 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 4, ,� OA&4'41, ?). asovfr 4, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 5, 1988 COMMENTS DUE: MAY tv,-,c1,19b%,. EFC - 034 - 88 �y APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 04, PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: TACO TINE CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAT. TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVTNG APPROX 12 , 029 SQ. FT. OF WHICH 92% WTT,T, RR OFFT( F ANn 87 AS STORAGE . LOCATION: LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST OF RATNTEB AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF' EXTENDFD, 9n0 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: . 96 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 12, 029 SO. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air � -- 3) Water 1� 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources f/ 7) Environmental Health �! 8) Land and Shoreline Use -� 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare Csr 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: Driveways to be 30 feet in width for two-way entrance and exit usage. If driveways are less than 30 feet as shown, they must be signed for one-way operation at entrance or exit and one-way pavement arrows used to direct traffic. It should be noted 18' is required between driveways and also the driveways shall not exceed 40%% of the street frontage as it will on Rainier Ave. South as shown. Please resubmit driveway plans. Lp Truck maneuvering for loading ramp must be totally on private property. Truck's cannot use Lake Washington Blvd. for maneuvering. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified' areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. eV,LJe.; /2 Signature of Director or Au orized Rep esentative Date 7 ISO(' 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ' 4Fy REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: . DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 5, 1988 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 17 , 88 9i9 EFC - 034 - 88 f +4, APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 ®� 4 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: TACO TINE CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAT. TO AT.T,nW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVTNa APPROX_ 12, 029 SQ. FT. OF WHICH 927 WTT.T, BE OFFTrF. ANn R7 AS STORAGE. LOCATION: LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST OF RATNTEP AVENTTE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDFn, 7(Ip. RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: . 96 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 12, 029 SO. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities. COMMENTS: GA/14/1/ A5/141644,, ,„,y Pal�e� We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional ' format is needed to properly assess this proposal. Jam/ 1// (,. Signa e of Director or Authorized Representative Date `.�RF�r eit 'et 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET /,fib `/kit 986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: re f-U t►M ��M�+y DAT A 'RCUL8TF};i Y 5, 1988 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 17 , 1988 Peito J EFC.ing34 (c APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC PROJECT TITLE: TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPRnVAT. Tn AT.T,nW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVT_NG APPROX 12, 029 SQ. FT. OF WHICH 92% WILL BE OFFTr.R AND 87 AS STORAGE . LOCATION: LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST nF RATNTER AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENT)FT) 9n0 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: . 96 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 12, 029 SO. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR . INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources . 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline. Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention, to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 6 1�Y.4g442G, ` � gr.caf.o�• '. 1 zee.,oc bats RIQU I RrI) FIR( FLOW CALCULATIONS ( ; :�..),�o' 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION / �l n NAME I pc o T iy)- O -(VICE '/d''•QuNC U.B.C. CLASSni4 UILSI 517^) ADDRESS /1/0/)2oxim '{i 9 -re, SfieELv FIRE MGMT ARE-Al #V V6 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD FRAME (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW)D 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA; 4/07,2 FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: z ' 3.he) • TOTAL BUILDING AREA: y2vo�5 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): .30oo GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: - 756 IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B)PM CC) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) Z Z3D GPM (p) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: rizs GPM (E) (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT; USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAR. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. 11 - 30 20% MAX. NORTH .20� ADD 0 % 31 - 60 15% MAX. EAST a � ADD iD % 61 -I6010% SOUTH MAX. ADD , 23 $ 11 -150EST ADD Lo 101 OR-1 4-HR WALL 5% MAX.� TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : 5'5 % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJ/2STMENT: /6/.2 .5 GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: iviE7-,94- CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: - • 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: GPM (G) (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,O GPM) 22 so (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: .:?7.3 - 444 GPM (H) 1. SIGNED: ,& &� � I 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 40G` C' ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �h�trine-erirvq� 46 9 ` 'too DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 5, 1988 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 17 , 98ac 4 EFC - 034 - 88 9�i `9�� APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAPPROVAL: SA-034-88 �o O& PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPRnVAT. Tn AT T OW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN CORPORATE OFFICE BUTT,T)TNG HAVTN(1 APPRfX 12, 029 SQ. FT. OF WHICH 92% WILL BE OFFTC.E AND 87 AS STORAGE. LOCATION: LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST OF RATNTFB AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDFn, 2n0 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: . 96 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 12, 029 SO. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health ✓ 8) Land and Shoreline. Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services L 16) Utilities c/"-- COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informati n is needed to properly assess this proposal. `S S Signature of re tor or Author zed Representative Date 444P4S‘ RENT1 BUILDING & ZONING DEN] 'MENT cam,,, b DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW %HE- ®"f0" -119 1 } 034 _ 88 �`�, �''" ECF - Q APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 O .0� PROPONENT : ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE ; TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON STRUCTION OF A CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 12,029 SQUARE FEET OF WHICH 92% WIL'L BE OFFICE AND 8% ' AS STORAGE. LOCATION : LOCATED : SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST OF RAINIER, AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDED, 200 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 5/25/88 n ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : RyTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M. ON MAY 17, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : OM-/Ty /✓L-. n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS L NOT APPROVED )/.e-t l UTILITY APPROVAL SURLECT TO - - t-t l U LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-VJRE_ Af LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-SE i ER NO , SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CNF,S'E-WATER 5*.D . {cr x 2//T8''_- $o/7• ?Z SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CNAREE-SEWER, y,ES. ). Dye .00. A-erx // —#`8517• SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA C6 :40E-WATER Am A / (p94. 2$ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CNA:.GE-SEWER / ' APPROVED WATER PLAN YES -, SPPROUED SEWER PLAN A/ APe�CtOJED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS �� 13Y FIRE DE?T. y 5 Iry NO /� - DATE: �`/ f/� /39er SIGNATURE OF DIR 'CTO',� OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 5-/o-2enw REVISION 5/1982 • %��,� V 1 o 1 1rTY OF RENTO�=7 FILE NO(S): SA:- o -ea al B�I:�DING & ZONING DEPARTML •.T Fir- a� -S♦ N� MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those . items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) f APPLICANT il F TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME ht /�,. T'zc.�C�� 0 I w c FEES ADDRESS \ /� REZONE*(FROM TO ) 9 l � 1-cf'r Pl.� V tu�.G 4w SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP CD TEMPORARY PERMIT* g* MD f w A. R80 6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* 1'''1 v /T V !�i�f /�, n SITE PLAN APPROVAL TELEP E � � � Q SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL ( c ( ) v""' `�'� � No. of Cubic Yards: , CONTACT PERSON Q VARFromIANCE* Section: NAME • * Justification Required ADDRESS I SUBDIVISIONS: to l I CO ✓/�,,�c•+h M V G T. e-,` I Q SHORT PLAT CITY t till k `[. IQ,. ZIPIP �y Q TENTATIVE PLAT TELEP Esve M,e l c.Jt. 9'84-ci Q PRELIMINARY PLAT ��(( ��/+/�/)� 0 FINAL PLAT (2� °) 5'4 7 l� WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER I NO. OF LOTS: NAME t PLAT NAME:. , Ce 9-� \ i t ADDRESS A ` / PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: j l \ k I l- At PL. v (� W 1 Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP Q FINAL • P.U.D. NAME: TELEP JQNE /- .00) 22(y - 6060(j� 0 Residential Q Industrial `+� Commercial n Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROAERTY ADDRESS 11 A r kite?.I �0� Q TENTATIVE EXISTING USE f' PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY V/c It 1T' 'e'At L '5 FINAL PROPOSED USE I PARK NAME: ,.-,,a T, \..- : FF I Co (IJA'Ref4CDOe NUMBER OF SPACi ,� . a E ''' \ MiEN7ACivRi:=CO�`r*i T'T E"' SQ. FT. ACRES �,; = �� AREA: SQe ► q 1to t3T/�L FEES DATE RECEIVIV5F USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING 0e ' APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: ,t16 APR 2 9 1988 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 0 Accepted ' BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: I APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 0 Accepted 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO:gt Building Nf Design Eng. 4 Fire al Parks Police MI Policy Dev. LJ Traffic Eng. gd Utilities REVISED 1-a31-84. Legal description of property (if more space Is required, attach a separate sheet). C.,141 V ô , . AFFIDAVIT . 4S.t t— \i • c,A.‹-,et' , being duly sworn, declare that I am CZ authorized representative to act for the Property owner,[Downer of the property 'involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and,answers herein, contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge r , and belief. • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS .;; Q.4ve: DAY OF \\i\OLik 19 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT • • C tklyi, • (Name of Notary (Signature of Owner) Gfr ‘,gCA avirdl4uttr_N tcni I-A PreLk. (Address) at R(), (Address) ui/She 9: 0€5'51 (City) (State) (Zip) (.206) -(oCoo (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Foxm #174 • .c Legal description of property (if more space Is required, attach a separate sheet). AFFIDAVIT PA u I, .� _ _ being duly sworn, declare that I am rE authorized representative to act for the property owner,E owner of the(property,involved' in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the Information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS i Q'' DAY OF 1987. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT i r l��f (Name of Nct'iry PufNlic) (Signatur ner) Stall .S \ �l $OSS etlk (Address) (Address) • w q&-os5 (City) (State) (Zip) G_-?.D6) Da 56 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." CIT', C' !ON SITE APPROVAL JUSTIFICATION . 4_? c. - U_ TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES °,j'i� r�r9 RENTON, WASHINGTON U:LU;;JV/LUiwuy �Lr'T. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This subject site is zoned B-1 which will allow any L-1 (warehouse ) use per 4-748 , D. 2 titled "less restricted uses" . COMMUNITY NEED The Taco Time business has long been established as a thriving business in the city . The subject site is situated in the middle of a major commercial center , and is served by 2nd Avenue and Rainier Avenue South which are quite capable of providing vehicular support without adverse impact upon them . The subject site is adjacent to a Safeway store which has operated successfully for years , our proposed use will generate far less traffic than Safeway . EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES 1 . Lot coverage - The site is• covered by ( 2) buildings, ( 1 ) the proposed office/warehouse building ( 12 , 029 sq . ft . ) and ( 2) and existing Taco Time Restaurant ( 2 , 690 sq. ft . ) and the balance is parking or planting . 2 . Yards - All required yards are maintained . 3 . Height - The proposed building is .29 '-0" which is well under the height limit of the B-1• zoni.ng (95 feet) and in character with an existing mix of one and two story buildings in the area . COMPATIBILITY The building is 92% office (allowed outright in a B-1 zoning) and only 8% warehouse which will cause it to stay in character with its neighbors . PARKING The proposed building requires 26 stalls and- 7 stalls are provided with full landscaping . TRAFFIC Due to the high amount of commercial use in the vicinity the streets are accepable of handling the proposed project . NOISE , GLARE The parking lot is partially screened by a 24" high berm and landscaping . The loading/unloading area is situated to the side to reduce its impact . LANDSCAPING Fully landscaped , please see Landscape Plan . • OF R . - . fA '�' ECF: I O34-tf , No 0 ® City of Renton l.U: s -034 ima O'9 O1 E•s, !q s � 9'TF �� 9 1.�1�� ENVIRONMENTAL CI�I CKIISlT `0 SEP °`. p inatil Purpose of Checklist: AL g' The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43 2I'Ci RLM:`requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from y6ur proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. •Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if -you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project." "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: / or-...pi 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact.person: FikOL Geed A (0 Vol Me. GT; tT 12. 4. Date checklist prepared: /2.8708 5. Agency requesting checklist: 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 7. Do you have any plar or future additions, expansions, or 'rther activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. O 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. vLq 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. - • 1 011, 91146 PPI2M1T ao ' WC III 190.►a0-" 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. f� Ia 02cr z. Pr. Ol% I c (9 2'c7)/w H o) C 3 '-'10J USA p- TNT ✓io(a 8c fbl�Tiz( 1"i ci or- � )19rU Forz -rl-f 1a 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Nn /A / 16<CJ,GGINrr o AN TFX L�cf i Nz -TINI G 0 • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); 40 rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other • b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand. gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. 6.I..YrHA-12,t2Fict.) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. �O - 2 - } e. Describe the irpose, type, and approximate qui \ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. �� 1N& t - U�U)U•+f G • �1 �1�� f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction. or use? If so, generally describe. NG cxGAVAcTIoN I kkAk 0.1 -1 st-re , g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example. asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or other impacts to the earth, if any: (N ,.)n Bpi 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? AVT(' T? c 9tC c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes. ponds. wetlands)? If yes. describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in. or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. C 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or . removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicalte the source of fill material. 1\10•1 - 3 - 4) Will the prop ,l require surface water withdraw or diversions? Give general descri,. ion, purpose, and approximately qua,..ities if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from • septic tanks or other sources, if any (far example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Nk c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. / 1 O ar--c 4 M WAS G✓T 4 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. )\1P - 4 - d. Proposed mE res to reduce or control surface, und, and runoff water impacts, if any: V\lic‘r . 4. Plants a. Check or circle typ:= egetation found on the site: a deciduous tree: .ld: , maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar,'pine, other a Sh • • gras o •p or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? A#w' c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Nz7 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 11 ,CF f(11/4k\) S. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other • b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. f\t?\' c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. - 5 - d. Proposed meat s to preserve or enhance wildlife, i iy: 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric., natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. - fCF HVC'cil\l& b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts. if any: Pek1 I icI @ W e-2 , 7 Environmental nmental Health E a.. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could • occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. • 1\1- 0 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: (� IV0' V� b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic. equipment, operation, other)? • - 6 - 2) What types a. levals of noise would be created b; r associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis iror example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 'Crdt f 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: NO1\1\ 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 1/2 or . OrcH 12 I/2 V r , b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Iv� c. Describe anystructures on the site. U'tC d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. I\1(2 i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 5 j. Approximately how many people'would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: - 7 - 1. Proposed mea: 3s to ensure the proposal is compr 'ile with existing and projected landd usese and plans, if any: PkXc W Iu' E2.1 OL) 2lNN&& 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whet r high, middle, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 0 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? 17/4 \Z I N c c1- (\1 b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: - 8 - 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? NONO b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so. describe. D c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: p 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national. state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic. archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NcINV- c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. if any: 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 4?%) b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not. what is the approximately distance to the nearest transi stop? ( 14 049 c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 47 eaAP W , 0 MIN I� d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). (//, r--Ap(2-cpv e tic-ebi i S • - 9 - e. Will the projo 'ise (or occur in the immediate viL ty of) water, rail, or air transportat.,.n? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 00 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in 'an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. 1lzz •b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. r 16. Utilities 'a. ' =0u ' ' = tly - .- • e da:. • e: =lectricit atural gas, efuse service = ephone, i itary sewer se. '- • em, . - = •. b. Describe the utilities that. are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and ,the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. /ail' /C43f C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any • declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on • my part. - Proponent: - Name Printed: .0 L. . Z EY.- - 10 - il17A 11-8-84 • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SF .T FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general. it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; • production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals. fish, or marine life? • Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? • • • Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: • - 11 - d . 5. How would the proL a1 be likely to affect land and ,reline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I. the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: - 12 - • • v. ✓ ' • • CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN • • H " "FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY" " " • PROJECT TITLE: • TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES • • APPLICANT: ACCORD, INCORPORATED • • • APPLICATION NUMBER: SITE. RL•AN APPROVAL: SA-Q3fl $8 • The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification Of tho pending site' plan application shall be sent to those individuals as proscribed by Ronton City Codo, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1620 rolating to site plan approval. • ASSESSOR'S N• AME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • Pete B. Delaurenti 216 Rainier Ave. So . 182305-9076 Renton, Wa 98055 722950-0090 Renton Property Ventures 933 Jazman Circle 182305-9273 (Pizza Hut ) Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Renton Property Ventures 933 Jazman Circle 182305-9213 (Pizza Hut ) Costa Mesa, CA '92626 Denny ' s Incorporated P.O.' Box 605 182305-9067 . • • ' La Mirada, CA 90637 Lawrence J... Warren 7906 S. 116th 182305-9236 Seattle, WA 98178 Boyden S. Russel 528 "A" St . .N.E. , 000720-0072 Auburn, Wa 98002 The Estate of Eileen Coleman 100 S. End St . 000720-0211 C/O Warren & Kellogg Atty ' s Renton,-,WA 98055 (Safeway) • • • • • • • � fi • • • • ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • • • • • • • • • • • • CERTIFICATION I, ••hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their add esse were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at Pnl i N 1,079 on tho 7'- day of I rr,---me,E2, . /7 c 7 044. 1 • SIGNE CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I. DER- I L( hlil , hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on 1fl 25, 1c1F1b , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at E ti-co,,3 , on the �St da�rof M •.1 lgi^s�6 �,/sir � r `i" C. ��"e'-�N ��;� ' � SIGNED: Of_Anf. e °o Na •••; G 41) doi •• - OF S," FORM 208 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 5, 1988 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 17 , 1988 EFC - 034 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 PROPONENT: ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE: TACO TINE CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAT. Tn ATJ nW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING PAVING APPRnX 12, 029 SQ. FT. OF WHICH 92% WILL BE (FFTCF OD 87 AS STORAGE, LOCATION: LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH', 2nd STREET, EAST nF RATNTFg AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IFIEXTFNDFn, 9n0 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA: . 96 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 12, 029 SO. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants . 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline. Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with , particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1 i Form 4 RENTC)BUILDING & ZONING DEPAMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF . — 034 _ 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-034-88 PROPONENT : ACCORD, INC. PROJECT TITLE : TACO TIME CORPORATE OFFICES BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF A CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 12,029 SQUARE FEET JOF WHICH 92% WIL'L BE OFFICE AND 8% AS STORAGE, LOCATION ; LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH 2nd STREET, EAST OF RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH, AND WEST OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH IF EXTENDED, 200 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 5/25/88 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M, ON MAY 17, 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED DATE ; SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982