No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA88-056 Vol 1 CITY OF RENTON DIVIS PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT P m'OIF RENTONN MEMORANDUM JAN 1 7 1991 litutrVE® DATE: January 17, 1991 TO: Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator Secretary, Environmental Review Committee FROM: Ronald G. Nelson, Building Official SUBJECT: 500 Naches Avenue SW/Rivertech Associates SA-056-88/B-14829 Landscape Buffer Bond Supplement We are in the final stages of occupancy for the above referenced project, including the release of bonds if appropriate. On June 7, 1989 the owner posted a $5,000 cash bond but the receipt does not identify the purpose of the bond. Our research of the December 19, 1988 ERC conditions reveals that No. 24 (see attached) requires the applicant to provide a $5000 bond to supplement the landscape buffer along the eastern edge of the Forebay Pond, with additional planting to screen the Heron rookery from the subject site. We think this may be the $5000 cash bond still being held in the special deposit accounts. Will you please advise if we can release it and, if not, who tracks it and how? Your immediate reply would be appreciated. RGN:mjp rgn#8/Rvrtech • • Itivertech Associates SA-056-88 December 19, 1988 Page 3 16. Storm water drainage can be conveyed to the Black River drainage system by the swale located on the south property line. Specific details of providing for the storm water discharge from the site were addressed by the ERC. The ERC required a system which recharges the area's ground water, after oil/water separation. The system was to include French drains or other acceptable recharge methods. The intent was to avoid a system of closed pipes or even surface ditches which merely conveyed the water to the swale along the south side of the property. Rather, the system was to permit the recharge of the ground waters all around the site, including the wetland area north of the site. 17. The applicant proposes three buildings on the subject site. The buildings will be placed along the east/west axis of the site. The westernmost building, Proposed Building 3, will be a wing or V-shaped building, three stories in height. The building is proposed to be a steel frame building finished in tinted glass. Detail treatment will utilize concrete banding and reflective glass elements around the entryways, and a brick masonry frieze at the roof line. A formal entrance with a plaza will be located along the south facade. Secondary entrances will be located along the north facades. This building will be approximately 45 feet tall. 18. Proposed buildings 2 and 3 will be located east of the three story building. Each of these buildings will be one story or approximately 20 ft. tall. Proposed building 2 will be approximately 17,705 square feet while proposed building 3 will be approximately 23,000 square feet. These two buildings will each be tilt-up concrete buildings finished in tinted glass. The concrete will be painted. The exterior treatment of these two buildings will be identical, while it will be complementary to proposed building 1 which is more ornate. The walls of both buildings will feature modulations and recessed wall panels to provide relief along the longer facades. These two buildings are intended to function as a unit, and the buildings are linked by walkways and a connected courtyard. 19. The applicant proposes approximately 15% lot coverage by buildings, and a total of approximately 23 to 24% coverage by impervious surfaces. 20. The applicant proposes providing 558 parking stalls of which 520 would be constructed immediately and 38 would be held in reserve. Some parking will be located along the outer edges of the site, but these areas will observe setbacks from wetlands on the north and from the drainage swale on the south. The parking along these margins will meander avoiding the sterile aspect presented by straight rows of curbs found in larger parking areas. Parking will also surround the three buildings. Landscaping will break the rows of parking periodically. 21. Native plants and trees will be preserved both north and south of the site in and along the wetlands and associated buffers, and along swales formed in these areas. The eastern taper created by the convergence of the rail line and the south property line will be maintained in its natural state. Supplementary plantings will be added to some of the natural landscaping along the perimeter of the site. The applicant intends to preserve some existing trees in the interior of the site, and buildings and parking areas have been designed or located to avoid some of these features. 22. The three buildings will be set in landscaped envelopes. Landscaped groupings of deciduous trees, flowering scrubs and evergreen trees will fill these envelopes. Again, some of the larger trees will be incorporated into these plans. Obviously some larger trees will yield to development, including some larger Cottonwood and Hawthorne trees. 23. A Heron rookery is located west of the subject site. The rookery contains approximately 40 Heron. The Heron have increased in numbers over the last two years from approximately 18 to 20 birds according to the current count. Various measures have been provided to permit the birds to be left generally undisturbed. There have been limitations placed on surrounding construction activity during the critical nesting period running from around mid to late January through the fledgling departure around July. In spite of these restrictions development on a number of projects in the area has been permitted. In addition, development on other projects in the area has not had an apparent adverse affect on the rookery, although long term consequences have not been reviewed. 24. The ERC required the applicant to provide a bond to supplement the landscape buffer along the eastern edge of the Forebay Pond, with additional planting to screen the Heron rookery from the subject site. The staff and applicant agreed that this bond should be limited to Five Thousand Dollars ($5000.00). SA -OS‘ - 65 The Schuman Company REAL ESTATE AND DEVELOPMENT Columbia Center,Suite 4640 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle,Washington 98104 July 11 , 1990 Tel(206)386-7111 Fax(206)386-7241 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUL 1 2 1990 Mr . Don Erickson "` City of Renton Planning Department RECEIVED Current Planning 200 Mill Ave . S Renton, WA 98055 RE : As-built landscape inspection Rivertech Corporate Center - Phase I Dear Don: Enclosed is a copy of the as-built landscape inspection report performed by Sandra Hasegawa a registered landscape architect . At the time she did her inspection the parking islands in the rear of the building had not been completed . Those landscape islands have been completed . To be completed into the landscaped islands are the sidewalks connecting the parking lots . These sidewalks will be poured at the time we pour the pad for the additional HVAC units that are being installed in the building during the Tenant Improvement phase of the project . That pad and sidewalks will be poured the month of July. The inspection report indicates areas where plant materials do not conform to the original landscape plan. This nonconformity was due to the inability to attain certain size plant material . We have added additional plant material to compensate for the inability to obtain the proper sizes . (See Item 14 of the Inspection Report ) The landscape architect has indicated that it is her opinion that the landscape installed meets the intent of the landscape plan. We ' ll be seeding the bottom of the grass line swales again this month and installing the picnic tables in late July or early August at the completion of the Tenant Improvement buildout . The landscape materials are warranted for one year, so any material that die during the initial warranty period will be replaced . We look forward to you ' re signing off on the landscape plan for the 0ccupancy ,Permit based on this landscape inspection report . Don Erickson July 11 , 1990 Page 2 If you have any questions , please contact me at your earliest convenience . Sincerely . oren Davis Director of Development The Schuman Company cc : The Architectural Construction Correspondence Bruce Moe Sandra Hasegawa . - - . . ` ' June 20, 1990 The Shuman Company Columbia Center Suite 4640 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Att: Mr. Loren Davis Re: Rivertech Corporate Center Phase I as-built landscape inspection On Thursday June 20, 1990 a landscape installation inspection was preformed for the above mentioned project. The installed landscape is in compliance with the landscape plan by the Mitchell Nelson Group (dated 12-19-88, final revision date 7-17-89) , except as noted: Site Perimeter South Perimeter: 1 ) Five less Rhododendrons, one extra Ash. 2) Grass not evident at bottom of retention pond (seed has not germinated) . 3) Benches and picnic table haye not been installed yet. North Perimeter: 4) Several varieties of shrubs were substituted from the riparian plant list, however the substitutions ' are appropriate for riparian areas and of proper size and spacing. 5) Eight Vine Maples (5 '-6'ht. ) were substituted for six Oregon Ash (2" caliper) and twenty-two Quaking Aspen ( 1 1/4" caliper) were substituted for nine ' Bitter Cherry (2" caliper) . 6) Grass not evident at bottom of retention pond (seed has not germinated) . 7) Ivy ( 1 gallon- 2 'on center) was substituted for Kinnikinnick ( 1 gallon- 3 'on center) . West Perimeter: 8) The Red Maples (2 1/2"- 2 3/4" caliper) , though well formed, are smaller than the 3 1/2" caliper size specified. 9) Ivy ( 1 gallon- 2 ' on center) was substituted for Kinnikinnick ( 1 gallon- 3 ' on center) . 10) One Euyonumous shrub was substituted for one Ash tree at northwest entry. parkjnq Area Landscaping. 11 ) Green Ash (2 3/4" caliper) , though well formed, are smaller than the Flame Ash (3" caliper) that they were substituted for. 12) Seven parking islands are not yet completed, however ^ ' the trees for these islands are on site. 13) Ivy ( 1 gallon- 2 ' on center) was substituted for Kinnikinnick ( 1 gallon- 3 ' on center) . Buildiag_perimeter Lan 9- 14) The Cherry trees (2"- 2 1/4" caliper) are smaller than the 4" caliper size specified, and they do not appear to be healthy. 15) Benches and the bike rack have not been installed yet. 16) Raisedbrick planters were substituted for the concrete pots. 17) Some of the lawn and bed areas have been interchanged. 18) Hypericum and Vinca (4" pots-2 ' on center} have been substituted for Kinnikinnick ( 1 gallon- 3 ' on center) . 19) A substantial quantity of shrubs and trees have been added. In summary, even though there have been some substitutions and down sizing, the landscape installation generally looks good, and, in my opinion, meets the intent of the referenced landscape plan. If you have any questions or need any further assistance, please call me at 285-8044. Sincerely, v , --__- Sandra Hasegawa Landscape Architect ^ � • REAL ESTATE AND DEVELOPMENT • J`_`k-E. ire i J J ,� s� Columbia Center,Suite 4640 Alt ti ID f 990 m 701 Fifth Avenue ! 75 o'semae` Seattle,Washington 98104 Yosemtte' t � � Don Erickson City of Renton Planning Department Current Planning 200 Mill Ave. S Renton, WA 98055 Llekl GO 4=44 CITY OF RENTON '"Np COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT At Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division October 16, 1989 / Rivertech Associates 16300 Christianses Road, B3 Seattle, Washington 98188 , Re: RIVERTECI-I CORPORATE PARK 500 Naches Avenue S.W. File No. B-14829 Dear Sir/Madam: The Planning Division of the Renton Community Development Department made an inspection on October 13, 1989, at the premises of the above-referenced office building complex now under construction to check on the hydroseeding and stabilization of the exposed sloped areas around the site. It is our intent to inspect construction sites City- wide to ensure that erosion is minimized to the fullest extent possible during the rain season. This inspection noted that the open and sloped areas within office park complex have not yet been stabilized and are in need of being hydroseeded. These areas will, therefore, need to be hydroseeded. Upon receipt of this letter, please see to it that all exposed sloped areas are hydroseeded. It is very important that the hydroseeding be done immediately so that the planting can establish itself before the winter rainy season begins and before cold weather adversely affects its germination. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at 235-2550. Sincere y, vim' �Vb,C Jerry F. Lind Land Use Inspector/Landscape Planner JFL:rivertch:dsk8 1 200 Mill Avenue South -• Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 9"//889 a0 CY STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000 July 14, 1989 111si if.)' JUL 1 8 1989 Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator iI Lr (� �-3 (� ,`� �; City of Renton II 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Erickson: Thank you for your prompt attention in resolving the concern we had regard- ing the Rivertech Corporate Center Phase 1, specifically with regards to the hydrologic connection. We have been contracted by Loren Davis of the Schuman Company and it appears that the conditions of the Shoreline Hearings Board decision will be met by the actions he proposes (i.e. surveying, stak- ing, and a 20' minimum hydrologic connection) . Also thank your staff, primarily Jeannett: ;c ague, for her assistance. 1111111 Si' 111, Thomas Mark, Supervisor Shorelands Management Section Shorelands and Coastal Zone Management Program TM:so affl- 3 61 WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER July 12 , 1989 1r� Mr. Don Erickson � I' JUL 7 1989 s Zoning Administrator City of Renton 1 [ FL, U nII r' 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA. 98055 RE : Compliance with Shoreline Hearing Board decision Rivertech Corporate Center-Phase ( 1 ) File SA, SM-056-88 Dear Mr . Erikson, Pursuant to your June 28, 1989 letter regarding the hydrological connection between the Wetlands to the north of our Phase ( 1) project and the concerned wet habitat of our Phase (2) area, I have taken the following action: 1 . I have contacted Thomas Mark of the Department of Ecology and discussed with him his concerns and requirements for the hydrological connection. Mr . Mark indicated that he wanted a 20 foot minimum hydrological connection between the Wetland area to the north of our Phase ( 1) and the wet habitat of our Phase (2) property. This 20 foot hydrological connection must be within our property bounderies not using any of the railroad easement right away to the north. 2 . I 'm having Bush, Roed , and Hitchings , our surveyors , set • the property corners and measure the opening 'between the property corners that now exist . In addition they will be hanging surveying tape between the property corner stakes so that I can , photograph the existing hydrological connection. (See Attachment 1) 3 . Once the surveyors have completed staking the property corners and the photograph is developed I ' ll provide you with a conceptual sketch of what we need to do to insure that the hydrological, connection is at least 20 feet wide and contained within our property lines . I will deliver the conceptual sketch to you within the next two weeks . ' I , 1 WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER At the present time the existing hydrological h drolo ical connection is about 30 feet wide which may include a portion of the railroad easement/right of way, but is adequate to provide the hydrological connection for the next week of so until we can define exactly how much of it is on our property. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the above defines scope of analysis , please contact me at your earliest convenience . Sincerely Yours, Loren Davis Director of Development The Schuman Co . cc : Thomas Mark Wetland File „ - .a,.: .,; ...wgt�k�� x.rY+�ry•rinyr<�.Yvaa 7iS�iN-, y,,us.e�s•ati � �%ice a„ ;t,,.. } ,e ;��;•�S�.w; �� ivy Yl' "�`� �n tp3 I i I iI • • Li • i . b. ,,,,, 'ilV 1 . 1 • " ‘177461-4 \ I 1 ti . R a' JD. ft L *'Itil...-4 .1, i I - . \....I . . ":„..,.. 4,4.--) '' wcibiel,p,&340 .2.131....ev-itt, 444, ._ ._.,>-• j i . -�%,,. Zp„, , 1 � �. .. .. .. ) --f. ' ----- --- . 4:fli - - °eV NVYlad . . vU D -____,, , U) 1 fib- ‘119el '"mod • .'s I - --)054 4,-D- .Iva,la . . - . . . . 1 _viwAy-)okktv . . .. ... _,. saninimmisummume ::,,,,,,i:,!4,:, ...,. .it$..,.,,,,.:...„,,,„,... ...,, ,,;,.,... i.;.. . .. , , ,,.,. . . . a.; . . "c 1' I, CITY OF RENTON tsr COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division June 28, 1989 Mr. David Shuman Rivertech Associates 16300 Christensen Road Bldg. 2, Suite 219 Seattle, WA 98188 RE: Compliance with Shoreline Hearings Board -Decision Rivertech Corporate Center-Phase I File SA,SM-056-88 Dear Mr. Shuman: It has come to our attention that the plans showing the drainage/recharge concept submitted to the State as a revision to the shoreline substantial development permit (SM-056-88) issued by the City on January 11, 1989 does not satisfy the first condition of the Agreed Order of Remand as noted in the Department of Ecology's June 14th letter to the City which was copied to you. Prior to the letter being sent to us, Jeanette Samek-McKague, of my staff, had a conversation with State staff regarding the need to revise the plans. Staff .passed this information on to Loren Davis of your office on June 6, 1989. Following this conversation with Mr. Davis we received a fax showing the area of the plan needing revision (See attachment 1) . Jeannette Samek- McKague then called the State to get clarification on the specific revisions to the plans which she understood to be both the elimination of fill in the northeast corner of the site as well as a modification of that portion of the swale adjacent to this area. The June 14th letter is the State's response to her request for clarification. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 , Mr. David Shum„ June 28, 1989 Page 2 We would strongly recommend that you arrange a meeting with Thomas Mark of the Department of Ecology to get this issue resolved as soon as possible. As we understand it, the State is not looking at stopping your permit activity but they do want the plans revised before the project gets too far along. We will not stop the site preparation work . currently being done on the site, but if the matter is not resolved soon we will be required to post a "Stop Work Order" on the site until resolution of this shoreline permit Agreed Order of Remand issue. If I can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to call me at 235-2550. cerely, / _ V J Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/MCK:mjp • Enclosure cc: Larry Warren, City Attorney Ron Nelson, Building Official Thomas Mark, D.O.E. . - i • , I . • , .: . V 1 ii.....11Laill .. I I • . . I • I ... . 1 . I . I i . •. . - . ...4-, I • 1 9;V ' 1 _...,-11 • 1 . . . .. • ("j")44:-.1"----- ,-: . '' ..,.l._.. 11 • I- • • ,...., • . / ; . . ; > 44,44p wobroveiaeep DrT1/-itt, •. 4r4b \S4L11111 it OP°I ......lbir 4 Iii,4. • . • ..... 111141.1"arnr.72..... 10.00114. 44. I•• s •"...--- -...... . SO 44S SIN • %, IA. S1.1 al — .. .• .. - • ...: • • -,r445041,..._ rip"T‘IIPAFAI, .rmArmorizows, . . AWN. • 411 i . 'w41020170.00611Pwribrs' "Ir tAvrat4 r4=91i' ''. 2L1... ,S :f 14 iyy4tic. iti• ,.... NC21-1.1a'aii ir:::' --,,„..,....... • €11 sm -- - 407` >1•-• 10.a.1.1 . . . . . . . . . . • • . . . , . . . •. . . . . . • -- . . . • : V?IfV-I'N1 T" " d . .• , . _ . • . • • 1 .ArNir ,/*NA..kv,vg .. • . ,.• , _ . normorammongsr ;;,.•...,..:,,3.1.,::•,..,,,.:1„:t,1.041,..4,0m.:4,,,,F4 - •ix.4,,:y./ ..••.. .,•,‘",„t.::•.,-,A.„..,.,:td„..:,:,,in.... .. - ••,_,. .!, ,;•. , . 1 - , DETERMINATION OF LION-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (RECONSIDERATION) MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Rivertech Associates ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-056-88 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-056-88, SM-056-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three building: a 3 story office building of 67, 000 sq. ft. , and 2 one-story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft. and 23, 000. sq. ft. respectively. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue S.W. DETERMINATION: Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner to ensure that, to the greatest extent possible, as many of he significant trees on the site are retained as specified in the FEIS for the Blackriver rezone application. NOTE: Per the FEIS, a minimum of 20% of the site is required to be landscaped with ,continuous natural landscape materials and large trees may need to be placed in tree wells to protect them. 2 . That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner on revising the landscaping plan to include plants species which will provide sources of food for birds and small animals per the recommendations in the FEIS for Blackriver. 3 . That the applicant limit fill material to building pads and landings and that the applicant place only clean fill within these portions of the site. Said filling shall not exceed the 100year floodplain level, plus one (1) foot. This material shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to it's disposition on site. NOTE: Minor grading of parking areas will be allowed sufficient to allow this use. 4 . That the applicant work with the Police Department and the Public Works Department on appropriate haul routes through the City. Trucks will not be allowed to use the roadway (proposedINaches Avenue right-of-way) through the Black River site north of the Forebay area between January 23rd or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left the nests. Mitigation Measures Rivertech Associates Page 2 5. That the applicant limit the operation of construction equipment to the hours between 7: 00 a.m. and 7: 00 p.m. , Monday through Friday per the Blackriver FEIS and that no construction activity shall be allowed within a 1,200 foot radius of the Heron rookery (to the west of the site) between January 23rd, or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left their nests unless full visual screening, approved by the City, is provided to block construction activity, including glare from welding activity or unshielded light sources having an intensity greater than 100 watts. 6. That the applicant shall provide bonding, funding or other security acceptable to the City Attorney sufficient to ensure the planting of a treed buffer within the greenbelt easement to the west along the edge of the old BlackRiver Channel, which will, at maturity, visually screen the Heron rookery from the subject site. NOTE: The applicant or his landscape architect should meet with the City's landscape planner to develop a plan acceptable to the City from which cost estimates for this improvement can be derived. 7. That the applicant shall work with Metro to develop a TSM program and shalllsubmit a copy to the City prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy permit. 8 . That the applicant shall reduce the number of proposed (547 stalls) parking stalls by 70 stalls by eliminating 45 of the parking stalls and placing 25 stalls into a landscaped reserve per Section 4-2208 (12) . NOTE: The reduction of parking stalls is based upon an 85% efficiency, a standard for industrial developments of this type. To the greatest extent possible the majority of the parking stalls shall be eliminated in the eastern portion of the site near the recreation area. The applicant shall work with the landscape planner on the location of the specific stalls to be eliminated. 9. That the applicant provide the City with a bond or other means acceptable to the City Attorney for their fair share of traffic improvement costs for the Grady Way Benefit area in the amount of approximately $146, 202 . 00 which shall be paid prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. NOTE: The above figure shall be adjusted to reflect a new trip generation charge currently before the City Council for approval. ', A range of mitigation fees are included in the studyl, A $70. 00 figure was used since it represents a mid-range level. Once the Council makes a decision regarding the per trip generation fee, the bond amount shalllbe adjusted to reflect the new fee. 67 x 17 . 7/1000 sf = 1185.9 trips/day 51 x 17.7/1000 sf = 902 . 7 trips/day Total = 2088. 6 trips/day 2, 088. 6 trips/day x $+70/trip = $±146, 202 10. That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff on a plan showing indoor recreation space with showers and lockers to serve the employees of the three buildings. Mitigation Measures `= ' 4 Rivertech Associates Page 3 11. That the applicant provide additional passive recreation areas, with seating and tables, on the western portion of the property to the satisfaction of the City's landscape planner. 12 . That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff in providing an easement across the far eastern and southern portions of the property to allow public access along the trail system which may potentially become a portion of the City's trail system. 13 . That in order to avoid visual and noise disturbance to the nearby Heron rookery, construction vehicles shall not be allowed to uselNaches Avenue S.W. between January 23rd or whenever the Heron fledglings have left the nests. All construction vehicles shall enter and leave the site via Po'qell Avenue S.W. 14 . That the applicant use a system of oil/water separators, catch basins (with filtration screens) and French drains throughout the site, or other acceptable recharge methods, in order to maximize the hydrological recharging of the are 's ground water table. NOTE: That the applicant provide a schedule for the periodic cleaning and maintenance of the oil/water separator for approval by the Public Works Department. 15. That the applicant restore and preserve that portion of a 50 foot natural vegetation landscape buffer around the wetland identified as EO2/3 in Figure 3 of the City of Renton Wetland Study that is on their property. NOTE: This shall be done in a manner approved by the City of Renton and the Department of Ecology including measures to protect the wetland from'human encroachment. Such measures do not necessarily necessitate the removal of existing fill materials. Measures selected will be based upon a careful review of the site and impacts on the wetland at issue by personnel from the City and DOE. mmdoc CONFERENCE REPORT NAME OF PROTECT: la\VSc27\- U DATE OF CONFERENCE: Lo l\c)° PROJECT NUMBER: -cO, - TIME: (START) (END) NAME AND TITLE OF ORGANIZATION PHONE PEOPLE ATTENDING 1. v ik• crMMErrrs: \. c-'-etvle.ev 1-tk'noc L41 FYI ��Th► j c c (. 3 o 6t Pam- x .cz- t—t r G 2. D,..) P - C.,OksJ t.DLAroz,,2-cam 2ve v.cria}a--- w2A- b w t•'ov- . No-&-a-tx LA/1\2-n pr2-c Uk--,.q-g=vn. A Li-r-ez_w 1� tJoix �',,��,�•- Gan 1rn L, 1���Il(0% 'T ,cam Qu 1p2, `�'o��t�-T' UN) - l l�.io o4T W- , 4, -if ail _c_J 'P.a �- -�- U'J , — `Leif! -,.,0._ _. eagied "tin. 17 to c1imo the ;case .— ... . - .. , jams(W'i BSI. . . - in. �.., ._NBA basketball:The Finals.Game 5 Second-year player Robin Hood board with a 67 that gave him a_r: r - - p,stons al Los Angeles takers tr,. won her first tournament on the total. Gary Player shot 68 and fir.: 1 I ,.—Baseball:Reg.onal coverage o1 Chita- 6 al New.York lasts or Houston Asiros at LPGA tour, shooting six birdies en ished third at 274 after he eagle files oo sera t"' route to 16 points and the champi- the 17th hole and birdied No. 18. I "+ u �ot��e Pub Notice Public Notice court. will be opened and read. i • . ( -pal Code'YJAY "B" PAVEMENT IMPROVE- A brief statement of the object of the action The work under this Contract consists! F ' XI the followin AND EXTENSION (ECF 0"s9 89) is as fellows:tc place the full legal custody ti 1,887 l.f.of 1i rS;ant seeks to re ave taxiwa "B"with of the minor child, TYLER SHAWN VAL- Construction of approx. m ' q p y DEZ,with the petitioners. sanitary sewer. t•~ it concrete 677 feet to the and Theto extend PETER W. MOGREN The Contract Documents are availabi iciway ate to the north. prop- ._ is located at the Renton Airport OF: HOLM, MOGREN &GLESSNER P.S. for public inspection at the offices of it !en Logan Ave., Airport Way, and Attorney(s) For Petitioners District (address listed above). Copies:'-1 , a i P.O.Address: 1002 S. 3rd; P.O. Box 90 the • Contract Documents may be obtains /�� sr Ave. North. Renton, WA 98057-0090 at the office of Hugh G. Goldsmith&Ass interested party may submit writtenConsulting g 1 County: King, Washington elates, Inc., Engineers, 14; _ _ tents,or may appeal the above deter- , :.c s`--a_:•---7i_. ;;on, within fifteen (15) days of the Published in the Valley Daily News June 114th Ave. S.E., Bellevue Washing;; - --"' _ .. 12, 26,July3,10,and 17, 1989. R3553 98004 (Telephone 206-462-1050) for tt its will date. ep ted comments or19, ti . �-. purchase price of $50, non-refunds t - its will be accepted until June 27, NOTICE OF ACTION BY Checks shalt be made payable to ttt7 C Appeals should be specific and shall • - srth the reasons whythe particular RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES LIMITED Cedar River Water& Sewer District.PARTNERSHIP Drawings included in the Contract dod -•,. -=s_:_;"...;••'':•�'::::::.• : T:--.:_ _:-::. . :- . ":_ :F f onmenial determination should be - •- - -' sed. Appeals shall be filed with the Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter merits are reduced to approximately o xiri Hearing Examiner,Municipal Build- 43.21C.ACY1, notice is hereby given that: half scale of the original scale. If full sec - • -'s f• 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA The City of Renton did on June 7, 1989, drawings are desired, they may take action described belo'v. obtained at the offices of Hugh G. Go : 5, within the fifteen (15) day tom- �J __ - • period. All appeals must be Any action to set aside,enjoin,review or smith & Associates Inc., (address list (/ rpaniel p pp otherwise challenge such action on the above) for $3.00 per sheet, ($30.00 p • �- •)'� rpanied by anon-refundable 575.00 -� • p mitigation measures grounds of non-compliance with the provi- complete set). fee. The g CW(State Envi- Proposals shall be on forms included -�t�=,�� Ins of chapter 43.21 C, R - - �, sions P ���= Environ- Documentsand shall ... .._._ _.. ..- of Renton's Contract � p. t Review the City ronmental •cy-Act)-shall-be commenced the al Committee are available at In thirty(30) days or be bane accompanied by a certified or cashiei •�, _ Manning Division of the Community - -:' F e a Ion n y Thi3 City o omen check, or a proposal guaranty bond, pi ' - •- fopment Department, Municipal Build notice of which is hereby given, was as able to the order of the King County Dire =:= -- ;. �.';'-w •'= c4� ; -1.F_ ,omen, Washington 98055,. Phone: follows: tor of Finance,in an amount not less lhae - -- �e ri=-7 f•��ti_•�.:_ „r , r-...Y-�i-•va :744;7 r' �550. -=:_�:L=- -- `�44 " -=t 1.Issued Building Permit No.B14829 for percent of the amount of the proposal,of R5260 June#51067 1989 Valley Daily the project described below. guaranty that the bidder will execute it it i R5260 Acct • t_ 2.This protect consists of a three story, Contract if it be awarded to him in canlC 073,268 square foot, office building. mance with the proposal. The success! ' 0 - g PERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON 3.Said action pertains to property locat- bidder will be required to furnish peril ` COUNTY OF KING ed at 500 Neches Avenue, Renton, Wash- mance and payment bonds in an amcd r .. 3. in ton. not less than 100 percent of the contr NO. F 0.69 LI ington. FOR PUBLICATION 4. Pertinent documents may be exam- price. (60 DAYS) fined during regular business hours at the Cedar River Water & Sewer Distr e JGIO A. VALDEZ and YVONNE VAL- office of the City of Renton, Building reserves the right to reject any or all bi4 - * his wife, Petitioners, vs. SH.4�Vt�A Department, located ai 20D M!II Avenue ud a snnd to it rofnlhehiDistricch t�sal ihes towel VALDEZ and TUONG NGUYEN VAN, South, 3rd Floor, Renton, WA 95055.FILED BY: responsible bid, and which proposals,4 ondents. RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES any,shall be accepted in the best intent �r STATE OF WASHINGTON, TO: f NG NGUYEN VAANN,, Respondent LIMITED PARTNERSHIP of the District. The District also resero I ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to David M. Schuman the right to waive any informalities or ire, • f' ar within sixty days after the date of General anagtrg-Pea r ularities in any proposal or bid. rst publication of this summons,to wit, ubtished in the Valley Daily News June) annoopProposals received ed for the opening will the 12 N not his is �. -" k i,and defend the above-entitled actin r a above entitled court, and answer the e ar River Water& Sewer District after the time announced for the opener �_ :!aint of the petitioners, REFUGiO A. Notice is hereby given that Cedar River or before the award and execution of t - DEZ, et ux., and serve a copy of your Water & Sewer District will receive sealed Contract, unless the award is delayed fot ver upon the undersigned attorney(s) bids for the construction of Madson Creek period exceeding seventy(70) days. laid petitioners at their office below Trunk�Sewer Unit D iPhanseegI auntl office Mr.S. .Gres Board of Commissioners • Tht SCHUMAN COMP.-AY REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT May 30, 1989 rrr, , -, GIVUuN CITY OF RENTON ID) MAY 3 0 1989 Mr. Don Erickson City of Renton ,' „ fir' C �S(� 11 V E Zoning Administrator �' 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Rivertech Corporate Center Dear Don: Per our phone conversation today, I am submitting our screening design and location for your information. As we discussed, the birds have hatched and are expected to leave the nest around the 1st of July. We have a preconstruction meeting scheduled for Friday, June 2nd with the City. We anticipate a construction start of June 5, 1989 . During the month o'f June , construction will consist of dirt work, utilities, foundation and slab work. If you have any additional comments we would appreciate receiving them during our preconstruction meeting. Sincerely, L?7�� Loren Davis 16300 CHRISTENSEN ROAD BUILDING 3, SUITE 219 SEATTLE, WA 98188 206.241.7211 FAX 206.241.7214 . / 1 / ex.),. 'ate. " '' ek„,,...L4. 7 r , r , — --------"\. . _ ..k.:\ 1. \ 0 , t itt . . .____ __,. .„ , ......_ 0N ' I 11 ...._____ ____ . , ‘a . —.._ _-..-_____,....______............„--- ..IQ, J I id. 1- C Ewe *, Ln�.,k."Tio �• • I Via } •, �, 4 Si- is I A. a11 lit ,I. 1 4 5 1. �' \....1 : I WM .:. mt:. I :, 1 be i -------- • . • aw • l I i • • I I•' I 20 NNii��l':: . I . • • • i ' �-�, • • :il y 0 3 �, --� it _ „,., I Co a 111 _ • • .--) L .I� : f • . • • iL _ LLLLLL ' I 1111 1''•y 9 • �' +i. . - .ice .. , J_ y • i'1114'1' '' ' ki ip •''' 0° .0° ( / / . •••••••:..'.... .s,.. 40........ ,• ltk .. 41 1 ii4414;1...'d•P'. ,..., r'' 'Ai, : ,,,,jiNik ........ .... . , i .. ,,,,i4,, trt 7-7,' eg, , . - \ ,, .. + , 1.el' i itt'.• •- • ®7.. • - 1�ooc� 1PoS.-7- • CHRISTINE 0. GREGOIRE ir''_ Director Sys 7889 Jay STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000 May 30, 1989 • PLANNIpZR �sroN aN SUN 1 1989 David Schuman 'E Rivertech Associates V 16300 Christensen Road Bldg 3, Suite 219 Seattle, WA 98188 Re: City of Renton Permit #SM-056-88 V Rivertech Associates - Applicant Revised .Shoreline--Management Permit #1989--l0018A Dear Mr. Schuman: The subject Revised__.Shoreline Substantial Development permit was received by this office on May 22, 1989 and approved by City of Renton on February 11, 1989. The appeal period will terminate June 21, 1989. At your own risk, construction may begin during this appeal period provided all other federal, state and local laws regulating such construction have been complied with. Sincerely (320 Jo Sohneronne Permit Coordinator Shorelands and Coastal Zone Management Program JS:jb - cc: VCity of Renton 3 . • 4% 0 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION May 19, 1989 Jo M. Soheronne • Permit Coordinator Shorelands and Coastal Zone Management Program Department of Ecology MS PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504-8711 RE: Rivertech Associates File SA; SM-056-88 Drainage System for Rivertech Corporate Center Dear Ms. Soheronne: With this letter we are transmitting a revision to the original shoreline permit. This revision shows a revised storm drainage concept for the site. Attached please find our original letter dated February 11, 1989 explaining the revision to the storm drainage system for the Rivertech Associates Rivertech Corporate Center. We have also included the revised storm drainage system plans. If you have any questions you may reach me at (206) 235- 2550. Sincerely, Jeannette Samek-McKague Senior Planner McK:mjp Attachments 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 r % - • realm 4. CITY OF' RENTON tticb— mg. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1/451(115 Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION gq-6 _T1 • February 11, 1989 •":)ia Mr. Bruce Smith Shorelands Management Section MS PV-11 Qlympia, Washington 98504-8711 RE: Shorelines Substantial Development Permit David Schuman/ Rivertech Associates File SM-056-88 Dear Mr. Smith: Enclosed please find a revision to the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit package for the above referenced permit. The shorelines permit issued by the City included reference to conditions imposed by the City's Environmental Review Committee and Hearing Examiner. Both decision-making bodies required the applicant to recharge the underlying groundwater table and preserve the major wetland immediately north of the site. However, this approach, whether with French drains or other methods of injection recharge, have been determined to be unsuitable given conditions of the soils on the site. The applicant, in meetings with City staff, stated that the soils on the site have low permeability and that for much of the site a clay membrane underlying the surface soils. The information submitted by the applicant indicates that the ponding in the area is due to this clay membrane. The water table was found at Elevation +7 feet and the water surface at the wetlands at approximately Elevation +10 feet. Thus, due to the existing condition on-site, it does not appear that the use of French drains or other injection recharge systems would achieve either the ERC's or the Hearing Examiner's objective of maintaining ground water hydrology and the related ecosystem. The applicant, based upon a letter from Earth Consultants, Inc. on the soil conditions and hydrology of the site, revised the storm drainage system for the site using a combination of tightlining, oil/water separators, and biofiltration. It appears that the 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 • • Mr. Bruce Smith • Shorelines Substantial D __,-)ment Permit David Schuman/Rivertecli Associates -� February 11, 1989 Page 2 applicant's proposal will ensure that the wetlands will be preserved by directing much of the stormwater generated on it toward the E 02/3 wetland while attempting to minimize the impact of urban runoff pollution through the use of biofiltration and oil water/separators, before the stormwater enters the wetland areas and the P-1 Channel Forebay. The applicant's plans and documentation on the revised storm drainage system were submitted to City staff and the above identified decision-making bodies. Based upon the review of City staff, it has been determined that the conditions requiring recharging of the groundwater have been determined infeasible for the site given the condition of the soils and the level of the groundwater table. Therefore, the applicant's revised storm drainage system for the site appears reasonable and, to the greatest extent possible, meets the intent of the City to preserve the wetlands and the ecosystem in the area. Sincerely, Jeanette Samek-McKague Senior Planner JSM:mjp modst�rF PLANNING DIVISION � iNC ti :::. ..o,, • � CITY OF RENTON Pollution Control Hearings Board e Shorelines Hearings Board .4 1889 Di. MAY .fin Forest Practices Appeals Board 5 IWO.. STATE OF WASHINGTON n' Q nu 2 ENVIRONMENTAL HEARINGS OFFIC 4224-6th Avenue SE, Building No. 2, Rowe Six, MS: PY-21 • Lacey, Washington 98504-8921 • (206) 459-6327 • (SCAN) 585-6327 • May 4, 1989 Allen T. Miller, Jr. Rivertech Associates Assistant Attorney General 16300 Christensen Rd. Department of Ecology Bldg. 3 Suite 219 Mail Stop: PV-11 Seattle, WA 98188 Olympia, WA 98504 David Schuman Lawrence J. Warren, Attorney 16300 Christensen Rd. City of Renton Bldg. 3 Suite 219 100 S . 2nd Seattle, WA 98188 P. 0. Box 626 Renton, WA 98057 RE: SHB No, 89-6 DOE v. DAVID SCHUMAN, RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES & CITY OF RENTON Dear Parties : Enclosed is the Agreed Order of Remand in the above case. • Sincerely, • Hal Zi er an Presid ng • HZ/rb Enclosure cc: Don Erickson Jo Sohneronne - DOE I c�rriy that I rnaiied a copy of this document to the perssns and addtasaes Iisteai thereon, postage pre ajd. in a r, ;zx±g for United States'mall at Lac-ay. yy , .� on surr, ,.. p PLANNING DIVISION• P3\; c,. Pdilution Control Hearings Board W"' CITY OF RENTON Shorelines Hearings Board d' ��ry '"""Forest Practices Appeals Board MAY '1989 •- a7 .i�7v STATE OF WASHINGTON • ENVIRONMENTAL HEARINGS OFFIC ECEPIED 4224-6th Avenue SE, Building No. 2, Rowe Six, MS: PY-21 • Lacey, Washington 98504-892'1 • (206) 459-6327 • (SCAN) 585-6327 May 4, 1989 Allen T. Miller, Jr. Rivertech Associates Assistant Attorney General 16300 Christensen Rd. Department of Ecology Bldg. 3 Suite 219 Mail Stop: PV-11 Seattle, WA 98188 Olympia, WA 98504 David Schuman Lawrence J. Warren, Attorney 16300 Christensen Rd. City of Renton Bldg. 3 Suite 219 100 S. 2nd Seattle, WA 98188 P. 0. Box 626 Renton, WA 98057 RE: SHB No. 89-6 DOE v. DAVID SCHUMAN, RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES & CITY OF RENTON Dear Parties : • Enclosed is the Agreed Order of Remand in the above case. Sincerely, • Hal Zi er an Presid ng HZ/rb Enclosure cc: Don Erickson Jo Sohneronne - DOE I car,ify thet I maiied a copy of this dccumern to the persons and at:dre listen thereon. postage prepaid. in a racepstcte for United Status mail at Lar-ay. Wean on 1 •ice • • • RECEIVED 1 • MAY - o N 1.,89 2 SHORELINF HEARINGS BOARD 3 BEFORE THE SHORELINES HEARINGS BOARD 4 • STATE OF WASHINGTON 5 STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, ) 6 ) Plaintiff, ) - SHB No. 89-6 7 ) 8 v. • ) AGREED ORDER OF REMAND DAVID SCHUMAN; RIVERTECH ) 9 ASSOCIATES; and CITY OF ) RENTON, ) 10 ) Respondents. ) 11 ) 12 I. STIPULATION 13 The parties to this proceeding stipulate through their 14 respective counsel as follows: 15 1. All parties agree that the substantial development permit (SM-056-88) attached to the Request for Review in this 16 matter is hereby remanded to the City of Renton to be amended 17 such that the development approved is limited to the 18 previously filled portion of the Rivertech Property provided 19 that an improved hydrologic connection and habitat corridor 20 from the habitat recharge area located North of the filled 21 area to the wetlands East of the filled area is included in 22 the development. 23 24 25 26 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 7th Floor, Highways-Licensee Building PB 71 _ Olympia, WA 98504-8071 (206) 753-6200 r I % • 2. All parties agree to cooperate and to act in an as 2 expeditious a manner as possible in accomplishing amendment of 3 the substantial development permit and any associated permits 4 and approvals. 5 3 . Reissuance of the amended permit by the City of 6 Renton will result in a permit within the scope and intent of • 7 the application and will not require further public notice or 8 hearings as remand and reissuance follows solely from this 9 Order. 10 4. Respondents, David Schuman and Rivertech Associates, 11 agree that a condition precedent to any development of the 12 Rivertech Property beyond the development p permitted under this 13 stipulation, shall be the completion of a study of the wetland 14 characteristics of the Rivertech Property and the receipt of a 15 shoreline permit for any such further development. 16 5. Respondents acknowledge that plaintiff contends that 17 any development of the Rivertech Property, beyond the 18 development permitted under this stipulation, shall require 19 mitigation for loss of wetlands resulting from fill previously 20 placed on the property. Plaintiff acknowledges that 21 respondents do not agree that either a factual or legal pasis 22 exists for plaintiff's contention. 23 24 25 26 AGREED ORDER OF REMAND - 2 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 7th Floor, Highways-Licenaea Building PB 71 - • Olympia, WA 98504-8071 (206) 753-6200 1 6. Plaintiff and Respondents agree to dismissal of this. 2 proceeding with prejudice and without costs to any party. 3 4 BOGLE & GATES 5 6 DATED: 412- 1 7 Charles R. Blumen eld Attorneys for Respondents . 8 David Schuman and Rivertech Associates 9 10 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 11 12 DATED: Ary.ce cab r 9 ` 13 , Lawrence J. W r en Attorneys fo espondent 14 City of Renton 15 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 16 17 DATED: Af.Y4I 2 . I" ' ? I (4.10a 18 Allen T. Miller, Jr. Assistant Attorney General 19 Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Washington 20 Department of Ecology 21 I 1 22 23 24 25 26 . AGREED ORDER OF REMAND - 3 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 7th Floor, Highways-Licensee Building PB71 Olympia, WA 98504-8071 (206) 753-6200 V • 1 2 ORDER 3 Based upon the foregoing stipulation of all parties it is 4 hereby ORDERED that this proceeding is dismissed with 5 prejudice and without costs. 6 DATED thisof • 7 8 SHORELINES HEARINGS BOARD 9 10 11 AL ZIMMERMAN, Pre iding 12 13 61.) `f 14 WICK DUFF D, Member 15 16 17 JVITH A. BENDOR, Member 18 19tTI20 NANCY B RNETT'j 'Member 21 . 11 22 23 24 25 26 AGREED ORDER OF REMAND - 4 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 7th Floor. Highways-Licensea Building PB 71 Olympia. WA 98504-8071 (206) 753-6200 1 sTnrF • Pollution Control Hearings Board '.: ."f Shorelines Hearings Board y1 ' ;oy Forest Practices Appeals Board dH9 • STATE OF WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL HEARINGS OFFICE 4224-6th Avenue SE, Building No. 2, Rowe Six, MS: PY-21 • Lacey, Washington 98504-8921 • (206) 459-6327 • (SCAN) 585-6.327 February 28, 1989 PLANNING DIVISION Rivertech Associates CITY OF RENTON 16300 Christensen Road D MAR Q �9$9 Bldg. 2 Suite 219 Seattle, wa 98188 _ �2 2 o �Y/nn David Schuman 16300 Christensen Road Bldg. 2 Suite 219 Seattle, wa 98188 RE: SHB No. 89-6 DOE v. DAVID SCHUMAN, RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES & CITY OF RENTON Dear Rivertech Associates & David Schuman : Enclosed is our letter dated February 17, 1989 which was returned to our office ( see- copy of envelope ) . Also enclosed is our letter dated February 27, 1989 which you may or may not have received . It appears that both of you have the same address . Please let us know if this is correct , or if we can consolidate the addresses . We ' re sorry that this is late, and hope it wasn ' t an inconeniencee Ver truly yours , • • Judy McKune Secretary JM Enc . cc : All parties • • - _ <vtms 3 - I / sure r / f /"- / y R$ o. ( i% CITY OF REN I ON 04 i 4 -44 Baas ay� D . F E B 2 4 1989 E C E IIW E Ken Eikenberry ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON 7th FLOOR, HIGHWAYS-LICENSES BUILDING PB-7I • OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98504-8071 February 22, 1989 Wick Dufford, Chairman Shorelines Hearings Board Rowesix, Building 2 , MS: PY-21 4224 -. 6th Avenue Lacey, Washington 98504-8921 Re: Ecology v. David Schuman, et al. SHB No. 89-6 Dear Mr. Dufford: The pre-hearing conference scheduled for March 27, 1989 is in conflict with a prior commitment. I will be in Philadelphia from March 27 through April 3 , 1989. Would you please reschedule the pre-hearing. Your consideration is greatly appreciated. Very truly yours, A LLEN T. MILLER, JR. Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General Ecology Division, PV-11 Olympia, Washington 98504 (206) 459-6157 ATM:jl cc: David Schuman Rivertech Associates Lawrence J. Warren LHon Erickson oAD3 STATg Pollution Control Hearings Board y Y° Shorelines Hearings Board - wya ,BA, ° Forest Practices Appeals Board . STATE OF WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL HEARINGS OFFICE 4224-6th Avenue SE, Building No. 2, Rowe Six, MS: PY-21 • Lacey, Washington 98504-8921 • (206) 459-6327 • (SCAN) 585-6327 February 17 , 1989 Allen T. Miller , Jr . Rivertech Associates Assistant Attorney General _ 411 University Street Department of Ecology Suite 1200 Mail Stop: PV-11 Seattle, WA 98101 Olympia , WA 98504 David Schuman Lawrence J . Warren, Attorney 411 University Street City of Renton Seattle, WA 98101 100 S . 2nd P . 0. Box 626 Renton, WA 98057 RE: SHB No. 89-6 DOE v. DAVID SCHUMAN, RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES & CITY OF RENTON Dear Parties : Your request for review was received by the Board on February 14, 1989 . A pre-hearing conference in the above matter is scheduled for March 27 , 1989 at 1 : 30 p.m-. in the King County Executive Office , Executive ConferenceRoom, 400 King County Courthouse, 516 3rd Avenue, Seattle, Washington. The parties should be fully authorized at the conference to discuss and to negotiate a settlement . Therefore, it is important to prepare final' positions prior to the conference . If settlement is not achieved, a pre-hearing order will be drafted and a hearing scheduled . The Board requests that all parties also be prepared at the conference to identify witnesses and to list proposed documentary evidence to be used if this case goes to hearing . If we can answer questions or be of other assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us . PLANNING DIVISION Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON D FEB 18 1989I) Wick Duf ord Chairman WD/.jm cc : Jo Sohneronne, Shorelands Don Erickson, Building and Zoning Department e% << i CITY OF RENTON belL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION February 16, 1989 Office of the Attorney General Temple of Justice Olympia, WA 98504 ATTN: Shorelines Management RE: Rivertech (SM-056-88) Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Dear Sirs: Enclosed please find copies of documents and maps relevant to the above noted project for your review and information. This mailing was delayed because we were waiting for additional project maps. Should you have any questions please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Jeannette Samek-McKague Senior Planner JSM:mjp Enclosures 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 a. S,A- SG 4�arerso. --< (' Ken Eikenberry ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON 7th FLOOR, HIGHWAYS-LICENSES BUILDING PB-7I • OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98504-8071 February 14, 1989 p F E B 1 5 1989 Wick Dufford ECEIVE Shorelines Hearings Board Rowesix, Building 2, MS: PY-21 4224 - 6th Avenue Lacey, Washington 98504-8921 Re: State of Washington, Department of Ecolocty v. David Schuman, et al. SHB No. 89-6 Dear Mr. Dufford: Enclosed is a Certificate of Mailing to be filed in the above-referenced case. Please attach it to the Request for Review that was filed yesterday, February 13, 1989. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, Joyce L. Lawrence, Secretary to ALLEN T. MILLER, JR. Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General Ecology Division, PV-11 Olympia, Washington 98504 (206) 459-6157 ATM:j l Enclosure cc: David Schuman Rivertech Associates 1,/bon Erickson 3 1 2 3 4 BEFORE THE SHORELINES HEARINGS BOARD 5 STATE OF WASHINGTON 6 STATE OF WASHINGTON, • ) 7 . DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, ) ) 9 Plaintiff, ) SHB No. ) 9 v. ) REQUEST FOR REVIEW 10 DAVID SCHUMAN; ) RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES; and ) 11 CITY OF RENTON, ) ) 12 Respondents. ) 13 I. APPEALING PARTY 14 The state of Washington, Department of Ecology (Ecology) , 15 by and through its attorney Allen T. Miller,, Jr. , Assistant 16 Attorney General, requests the Shorelines Hearings Board to j. 17 review a Shorelines Substantial Development Permit (Permit) 18 pursuant to RCW 90.58 . 180 (2) . In support" of this request,19 Ecology alleges as follows: 20 II. PERMIT APPEALS 21 David Schuman of Rivertech Associates applied to the 22 city of Renton and the City subsequently granted a substantial 23 24 • 25 26 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 7th Floor, Highways-Licenses Building PB71 Olympia. WA 98504-8071 (206) 753-8200 1 2 development permit to fill and grade a ten-acre site in an 3 associated wetland of the Black River and Springbrook Creek 4 for an office park, such development to include three 5 buildings, parking, and accessory uses such as drainage, 6 landscaping and roads. A copy of the Permit application is 7 attached as Exhibit 1 and a copy of the the Permit is attached 8 as Exhibit 2. 9 III. GROUNDS FOR APPEAL 10 The proposed project will cause adverse effects to the 11 existing shoreline resources, including but not limited to 12 wildlife habitat, wetlands and floodwater retention. The 13 Permit is inconsistent with policies and regulations of the 14 city of Renton Shoreline Master Program, WAC 173-19-2520. 15 Such policies and regulations include, but are not limited to: 16 Goals and regulations to preserve and protect wetlands and 17 unique and fragile areas; inadequate consideration of impacts 18 to such resources in regards to mitigation of such impacts. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 REQUEST FOR REVIEW - 2 OFFICE OF TFE ATTORNEY GENERAL 71h Floor, Highways-licensee Building P8 71 Olympia, WA 98504-8071 (208) 753-8200 1 IV. RELIEF SOUGHT 2 The Department of Ecology respectfully requests that the 3 subject Permit be vacated. 4 DATED this 13Th day of February, 1989. 5 KENNETH O. EIKENBERRY Attorney General 6 • . 7 _ / • 8 ALLEN T. MILLER, JR. Assistant Attorney General 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Washington 10 Department of Ecology 11 Office of the Attorney General Ecology Division, PV-11 12 Olympia, Washington 98504 (206) 459-6157 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 REQUEST FOR REVIEW - 3 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 7th Floor, Highways-Licenses Building PB 71 Olympia, WA 98504-8071 (208) 753-8200 1 2 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. 3 COUNTY OF THURSTON ) 4 I, D. Rodney Mack, being first duly sworn on oath, depose 5 and say that I am a Program Manager for the Department of 6 Ecology, plaintiff herein., and am authorized to make this 7 verification on its behalf; that I have read the foregoing 8 Request for Review, know the contents thereof and believe the 9 same to be true. 10 11 12 D. R DNEY MACK 13 Subscribed and sworn to before me this /3 -- day of February, 1989. 14 15 a OLA-ob---..1=.471A) 16 No ry Public in and for the s ate of Washington, residing at 17 My commission a pires 3-29- 9 2 . 18 — r 19 20 21 22 . 23 24 25 26 REQUEST FOR REVIEW - 4 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 7th Floor, Highways-Licenses Building PB 71 Olympia, WA 98504-8071 (206) 753.8200 STAT. sN,+aee °yFFz Ken Eikenberry ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON 7th FLOOR, HIGHWAYS-LICENSES BUILDING PB-7.1 • OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98504-8071 PLANNING DIVISION February 15, 1989 CITY OF RENTON FEB 1 .7 1989 EUDavid Schuman v 411 University Street, Suite 1200 Seattle, Washington 98101 Rivertech Associates 411 University Street, Suite 1200 Seattle, Washington 98101 Don Erickson City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Department of Ecology v. David Schuman, et al. SHB No. 89-6 Gentlemen: Enclosed are Exhibits 1 and 2 that were inadvertently not mailed to you with the Request for Review yesterday, February 14, 1989. Please attach them to your copy of the Request for Review. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Joy97-e . Lawerence Secretary to ALLEN T. MILLER, JR. Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General Ecology Division, PV-11 Olympia, Washington 98504 (206) 459-6157 JLL Enclosures 3 1 2 3 4 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING 5 I, Joyce L. Lawrence, certify that on the /Vtday of 6 February, 1989 I personally mailed, postage prepaid, a true • 7 and correct copy of a Request for Formal Hearing in the case 8 of State of Washington, Department of Ecology v. David g Schuman; Rivertech Associates; and City of Renton, addressed 10 to the following persons at the following addresses: 11 David Schuman 411 University Street, Suite 1200 12 Seattle, Washington 98101 13 Rivertech Associates 411 University Street, Suite 1200 14 Seattle, Washington 98101 15 City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South 16 Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Don Erickson 17 18 19 • .cam eij20JOj'E i. LAWRCE 21 22 23 24 25 26 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 71h Floor, Highways-Licenses Building PB 71 Olympia, WA 98504-8071 (206) 753-8200 0398Z CITY OF RENTON Building & Zoning Department (206) 235-2550 SHORELINE MASTER APPLICATION APPLICATION FOR: OFFICE USE ONLY: m66I 01 2-157 I/ 25b . a° Application No. : cJrn ` O (P-bb la; SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT ECF No. : CV O vo 88 PERMIT /� SEC-TWP-R: 13_2(5"4, 175-25. . I-I CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT �•� (q' Date Approved: hl.l '��, \'\;\` , I_1 VARIANCE Date Denied: \\V A- Publication Date: hnA+ 'rI 'tuiti�7G PwuN/ I I EXEMPTION Comprehensive Plan:Mk:1 ZOPT100• dFF«6• I _I REVISION Zoning: o-p, OFFIC.t. PP+R.K_ Water Body:? 10,i4Mom 9 U1UF& -0 STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING r Date Recei`vAd�:'� e-;-� Application Received By: -..._.)'eAil (AWL-- :�, !3 �i CI Application Determined To Be: Accepted a Incomplete t.:.L 1 ,�„� Notification Sent On: .. (;1 ONh.L) �_,'T. By ( Initials) : Date Routed: Additional Material Received by: Application Determined To Be: —I ` az- at a Accepted a Incomplete Notification Sent On: By (Initials) : In addition to the information below, the applicant should include a site map and any other pertinent information which will assist in the review of this application. The Building and Zoning Department reserves the right to require additional information needed to evaluate the application. APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEILS 1-10 THROUGH 14-16 BELOW: INFORMATION: 1. Applicant Owner X Purchaser X Name: David Schuman Lessee Other Mailing 411 University Street Suite 1200 Address Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (206)623-5553 2. Name of Property Owner Rivertech Associates • Mailing 411 University Street Suite 1200 Address Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (206)623-5553 3 . Contact/ David Schuman or LPN Architects Consultant: Mailing 411 University Street Suite 1200 (206)623-5553 Address Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (206)583-8030 (LPN) "Exhibit 1" ; • •. . PROJECT INFORMAT-,1 4. General loca ►n of proposed project (g 1 -street address if any or nearest street and intersection) East of Naches Avenue S.W. and approximately 650' north of S.W. 7th at the termination of Powell Avenue S.W. 5. Legal Description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) : See Attached Sheet • 6 . Name of adjacent water area or wetlands: P-1 channel and basin and adjacent unadopted wetlands 7. Current use of property and existing improvements: Vacant with fill and pad on western half'of property 8 . PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY and proposed improvements (be specific) : Construction of one 3-story Office Building and two 1-story Office/R&D • buildings • 9 . Proposed construction costs and schedule: A. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed project include additional developments contemplated but not included in this application: $5 ,141,000 construction cost including tenant improvements. Fair market value: $14,000,000 B. Construction dates (month/year) for which permit is requested: Begin Fall , 1988 End Summer, 1989 10. List any other permits for this project from state, federal , local governmental agencies or the City of Renton for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for, and if so, the date of the application, whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same, and number of the application or permit: City of Renton Grade a Fill Permit City of Renton Site Plan Approval , application to coincide w/the Shoreline application City of Renton Building Permit; future application ITEMS 11, 12; AND 13 TO BE COJPLb?ED BY LOCAL OFF.ICZA+L: 11. NATURE OF THE EXISTING SHORELINE. (Describe type of shoreline, such as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, marsh, bog, swamp, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as accretion, erosion, high bank, low bank, or dike; material, such as sand, gravel , mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any) : - 12. In the event Z„�any of the proposed bi or structures will exceed a hei_ of thirty-five (35) feet. above the average grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view. 13 . If the application involves a conditional use or variance, set forth in full that portion of the master program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, in the case of a variance, from which the variance is being sought. ITEM 14, 15, AND 16 TO BE PROVIDED BY APPLICANT: 14 . If applying for a variance or a conditional use, complete the variance or conditional use form. 15. Project Maps: Attach to application accurate site plan and vicinity maps. Refer to application instruction handout for map requirements. 16 . Additional information (If necessary, attach as separate sheet) : • STATE OF WASHINGTON SS CITY OF RENTON J I, David Schuman • being duly sworn, certify that I am the above-named applicant for a permit to con- struct a substantial development pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and that the foregoing statements, answers, and information are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature cDN- Subscribed and sworn to me this k day \9 41001;4114 Igyoe Pub is in and for the State of = _ ;43.0Ington, residing at • FORM 177 • . NEW PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET THEREOF, SAID NORTH LINE BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS, PAGES 98 THROUGH 102, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88°15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1 ,099.78 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°45'00" EAST 418.89 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE WITH A RADIUS OF 1005.37 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 38°15'05" EAST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTHERLY LINE 346.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 71°29'03" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 912.08 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE NORTH 89°10'25" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 81.57 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 5.0000 ACRES. �o. 7 'X ' /3Zjo5—�o8( NEW PARCEL 2: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET THEREOF, SAID NORTH LINE BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF . PLATS, PAGES 98 THROUGH 102, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88°15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1099.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88°15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 526.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°45100" EAST 225.00 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 853.34 FEET A DISTANCE OF 209.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12°19' 12" WEST 30.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 71°42'49" EAST 218.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°15'00" EAST 350.00 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 1°45'00" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 1°45'00" WEST 400.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 5.000 ACRES, TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WITHIN 30 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 13, WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET THEREOF, SAID NORTH LINE BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS, PAGES 98 THROUGH 102, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88°15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1,626.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1°45'00" EAST 225.00 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 853.34 FEET,. A DISTANCE OF 209.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12°19' 12" WEST 325.81 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET A DISTANCE OF 803.66 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ON A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,745.00 FEET A DISTANCE OF 1,916.19 FEET TO THE TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE. l&'. Tax MO /3 21004-,o 87 FIRST CITY DEVELOPMENT CORP. APRIL 19, 1988 ARTHUR L. HITCHINGS BRH JOB NO. 86114.04 SURV. L.HI lc ,. t . WASpCJ' , p) • ors -*;$. / z ' O O� I „R.' r.+t LAP 000 i• . 11PB8 _!APT. �y O .~n '°4 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON � '� SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT � :! • ' : • NT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT, CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE '69 MI 13 APPLICATION NO. SM-056-88 DATE RECEIVED: July 1, 1988 DATE OF PUBLICATION: July 13, 1988 and July 20, 1988 DATE APPROVED: January 11, 1989 RATED DENIED: N/A TYPE OF ACTION(S) : _X Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Permit Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, the City of Renton has granted a permit. This action was taken on the following application: APPLICANT: David Schuman 411 University Street, Suite 1200 Seattle, Washington 98101 DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: See Attached LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE ATTACHED..APPLICATION SEC-TWP-R: 13-23-4 & 18-23-5 WITHIN SHORELINES OF: Black River STATE SHORELINE OF SIGNIFICANCE (YES/NO) : No ENVIRONMENT DESIGNATION: Urban (Note: Designation not shown on the map as such but City policy is that properties, under shoreline jurisdiction, in this area which are east of the confluence of the Black River and Springbrook Creek shall be Urban. APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: City of Renton The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: 1. Section 4. 02. 02 A,B & C, Protection and Presevation Policies for natural resources, Conservation Goal 2 . Section 5.04, Urban Environment 3 . Section 6. 02. 01, Pollution and Ecological Disruption 4. Section 7.05, Commercial Developments Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions: 1. That the applicant comply with the conditions of the . Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated issued on November 7, 1988 by the City for the project. "Exhibit 2" 4 David Schuman SM-056-88 Page 2 2. That the applicant comply with the conditions of the Hearing Examiner's Report and Decision issued December 19, 1988. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit regulations. 2 . This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Sec. 14 (7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permitee fails to comply with any condition hereof. 3. A construction permit shall not be issued until thirty (30) days after approval by the City of Renton Community Development Department or until any review proceedings initiated within this thirty (30) day review period have been completed. B}iia ing Official Dat 7L nn Ma er Da e THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT DATE RECEIVED: APPROVED: DENIED: This Conditional Use/Variance permit is approved/denied by the Department pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and conditions: Authorized Department Official ' 't b.O.E, NW District Office Attorney General's Office City of Renton Community Development Department City of Renton Public Works Department ^ City of Renton, Engineering Department Applicant � y Architecture and Planning rn son Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A.Berg,A.LA.; 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 TRANSMITTAL To: G I TY OP Date: Jj 4Q L-1,A4ZY 20 F t f1 I? I; I UII.-17I -.4& Z�I�I I Nv Project Name: 1=ZIV�I1--E—C1+ 2 2O IA I LL '. - P1 • Project No: 14k1 Attn: .I, O+N 1-4GIC, LA Re: 621V GOl21�l.-2KAS Gi✓Nt Description: 4 c a O� 2 - rr R 4 - �1�IJG� Mertz ki fW ` T k ��- - t7/ -r?42 I nb 1-LANNINO DIVISION CITY OF RENTON IJAN2 3 1989 Remarks: IZ`LSent per your Request ❑ For Approval ❑ Other: ❑ For your Use/Reference ❑ For Distribution ❑ For Review and Comment ❑ For your Records By: Is15 CC: - Airi CITY OF RENTON ..LL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: January 12 , 1989 • TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearin•�Ex.: nC'r FROM: Donald K. Erickson, oniii. dminist"rator RE: Rivertech Associates, File SA-056-88 Drainage Condition of Hearing Examiner's Decision David Schuman recently submitted information on the site drainage for the Rivertech site which affects both the drainage condition of the environmental determination issued , for the project and the drainage condition required as part of your decision approving the site plan application. The applicant's documents are attached for your review and consideration of the drainage condition in light of the new information. In your Decision, issued on December 19, 1988 for the project, Condition No. 4 of the conditions of approval specified the type of drainage system that the applicant should use for the stormwater drainage system which stated "The applicant's plans shall incorporate either French drains or some form of injection recharge system over those acres covered by impermeable asphalt, concrete or buildings. " . The applicant, in meetings with our staff, stated that, the soils on the site have low permeability and that, for much of the site, there is a clay membrane underlying the surface soils. The information submitted by the applicant indicates that the ponding in the area is due to this clay membrane. The water table was found at Elevation +7 feet and the water surface at the wetlands at approximately Elevation +10 feet. Thus, due to the existing conditions on-site, it does not appear that the use of French drains or other injection recharge systems would. achieve either the ERC' s or your objective of,maintaining ground hydrology and the related ecosystem. The attached information includes a letter from Earth Consultants, Inc. on the soil conditions and hydrology of 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 / Fred Kaufman, He,- ng Examiner Rivertech Associ ,_-s, File SA-056-88 January 12, 1989 Page 2 the site and a description of the applicant's proposal to use a system of tightlining, oil/water separators, and biofiltration which is illustrated on the attached plans. It appears that the applicant's proposal will ensure that wetlands will be preserved by directing much of the stormwater generated on it toward the EO2/3 wetland while attempting to minimize the impact of urban runoff pollution through the use of biofiltration and oil water/separators, before the stormwater enters the wetland areas and the P-1 Channel Forebay. The Environmental Review Committee reviewed the applicant's revised proposal on January 11, 1989 and determined that the proposal partially satisfied the intent of Condition No. 14 of their environmental determination issued November 7, 1988. The intent of the condition was to preserve the wetland to the north and maximize the recharge of the area's ground water table. Since the groundwater table now appears to function independent of the shallower surface wetlands and the applicant's soils engineer has found that the soils near the surface have a very low permeability, there appears to be little benefit in recharging the groundwater system. The Environmental Review Committee agreed to modify the environmental condition subject to the written concurrence of the City's Surface Water Utility Engineer of the applicant's findings and proposed conceptual drainage plans. The Storm Water Utility Engineer reviewed the material and, in a memo dated January llth, stated concurrence with the applicant's conclusions regarding the ineffectiveness of a recharge system for storm water for the site due to the "water table conditions and, the low permeability of the soil. The engineer also agreed " . . .with the use of oil/water separators in conjunction with biofiltration to improve water quality of the storm runoff prior to its discharge" . This memo is included with the attached material. If you have any y questions regarding the latest submittal material or need additional information to assist in your review of the matter, please let me know. DKE/JSM:mjp • b ki d"g •ti ti• 6 410 • Lemon Pomeroy Northwest.Inc,.Royce A.8etd,A.LA., 112f tine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583.8030 ;k, A !. January 6, 1989 ,0:• Mr. Don Erickson Zoning Administrator City of Renton ';:' 200 Mill Avenue South f' Renton, WA 98055 RE: RIVERTECH FILE SA-056-88 SUBJECT: COMMITTEE REVIEW OF NEARING EXAMINERS. CONDITIONS FOR DRAINAGE Dear Don: . Per our conversation and last meeting regarding the storm drainage for this development we are enclosing revised plans, letter from soils engineer and civil engineer's calculations for drainage. We have revised the plans to specifically keep: all water on site or at the adjacent wetland EO-2, EO-3, adjacent the site. Due to the percolation rate or lack of percolation at the existing grades prior to fill (see attached soils engineer's letter), use of french drains is not a feasible approach to maintain water and recharge the wetlands. ° The design concept presented for Building I incorporates biofiltering swales as shallow secondary wildlife habitat areas which drain into the EO-2, EO-3 wetland after being collected in the parking areas and tightlined and ' processed through oil water separators. The existing drainage swale along the railroad tracks will collect the storm drainage for buildings 2 and 3 in the same manner with the majority of it draining N.W. to the EO-2, EO-3 wetland and the balance draining to the east ' into another shallow secondary ponding wildlife habitat area near the main. recreational area. In the case of a 25 year storm all the above waters would back up and overflow into the main drainage channel along the south property line. r'• Mr. Don Erickson ' City of Renton January 6, 1989 Page Two • Due to slopes and to utilize existing fill and grades a small portion of the south end of the site will flow in a tightline and oil water separator into a third shallow and secondary wildlife habitat above the main swale area at the south property line. All the swale areas will be planted with wetland and food source type plants . and coordinated with the project landscape architect and city landscape architect, and the biological consultant. Respectfully, Roy a A. Berg Pr ident RAB:db David Schuman Loren Davis Bob Roed encl : BRH Letter dated January 6, 1989 Earth Consultants Letter dated January 5, 1989 Drawings - LPN Sheet 1 and 2 Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A.Berg,A.IA., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 . • • i. BUSH, ROED&HITCHINGS, INC. 2009 Minor Avenue East r15T- S'l�.+ ►-a F`. Seattle,Washington 98102 111111 ��^ �•;. � Area 206/323-4144 t Fax 206/323-7135 (-A � -! ' 1.1 3 IJ89 ''. January 6, 1989 LPN Architects & Planners 1,, Mr. Royce Berg Leason Pomeroy Northwest 1127 Pine, Suite 300 R Seattle, WA 98101 Re:. Storm Drainage " Rivertech Corporate Center • Dear Royce: .. Following are the calculations for the storm water drainage analysis for Rivertech Corporate Center. The storm drainage for the three story building (no. 1) for the Rivertech ', Corporate Center has been divided into 2 areas, a west area and an east area. , Each will flow through an oil/water separator and then into a biofiltration swale at least 200 feet in length. Both swales have been designed to carry . the drainage for a 25 year storm and have a depth of 0.5 feet: or less. They will also have relatively low velocities of about 1.2 feet per second to take advantage of the biofiltration characteristics of the swales. This also provides a method for recharging the wetland along the north property line. A small portion of the parking area to the south of this building will draili ' through an oil/water separator to a secondary recharge area that will allow some percolation to occur prior to over flowing into the drainage swale. This area is 11% of this site. Below are the calculations for this site. AREAS: WEST = 1.43 ACRES EAST = 1.86 ACRES ' TIME OF CONCENTRATION = 7.5 MIN; INTENSITY 2.3 IN/HR FOR A 25 YEAR STORM Qw = 0.85 (2.3) 1.43 = 2.80 cfs Qe = 0.85 (2.3) 1.86 = 3.64 cfs USING MANNINGS EQUATION: ' Q = 1.49 A R 2/3 'S ' WHERE N = 0.030 (GRASS LINED SWALE) S = 0.20% WEST SWALE, DEPTH = 0.4 FEET Q = 2.83 cfs V = 1.22 FT/SEC , EAST SWALE, DEPTH = 0.5 FEET Q = 3.70 cfs V - 1.23 FT/SEC BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS. INC. . ti, Mr. Royce Berg January fi, 1989 r,. Page 2 The storm drainage for the one story buildings _(No. 2 and No. 3) has been divided into two areas, a west area and an east area. Each area contains ti' r approximately 1.7 acres of impervious area. The northerly 1.2 acres of each site will drain through an oil/water separator and flow into a biofiltration swale along the Burlingtqn Northern Railroad tracks along the north property, line. The drainage, from '!Building No. 2 will flow to the northwest along the . • swale intothe wetlands to the north of Building No. 1. The drainage from Building No. 3 will flow to the southeast along the swale and will be collected in the secondary recharge area. • The drainage from the southerly parking areas, approximately .5 acres of each site will flow through oil/water separators and then to the west and east <'‘-'' secondary recharge areas. These areas will allow some percolation and will • `'� overflow into the drainage swale along the southern property line when these recharge areas are filled from an intense storm or previous storms. Below are !l; calculations for each site. AREA EACH SITE = 1.2 ACRES Q = 0.85 (2.3) 1.2 = 2.35 CFS DEPTH = 0.38 FEET, Q = 2.31 CFS, V - 1.2 CFS If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to call. Sincerel Robert M. Roed, PE RMR/cd . lr,l'S I_R ill,••on Presiii!'il1 i (. s.. rl;km iii'i \Arc Pif!;:Irk01ir • in Idl t;.?ql : Chin!(rlrhl!I.,i % P # ' r:if'nrrl Vjll nln�'1,1.i lii I ! I1 I:ilrl l 1 �,onsulld i its Inc. . .! �, Or t? .I(1!'f^, 1n';IIi111111r1!I:1! i•,lanallf`f �i�,! ‘14 td nhrl,l d,:d l.1011011.i I;r•,dn)fIV�tiln�linnnu•ltlnl ti,Igll),,I, 4 is „ tq.,l(' ,irl(1 1:119iileer111u f,1:111,11Iei ;Y',.'• i : }1 • F 1` January 5, 1989 E-1990-10 i Rivertech Associates c/o The Schuman Companies 16300 Christensen Road Building #3, Suite 219 - Seattle, Washington 98188 • Attention: Mr. David Schuman .R: . Subject: Groundwater Recharge '.: Wetlands Area Rivertech Corporate Center i Renton, Washington Reference: Earth Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report E-1990-10, dated December 22, 1988 Gentlemen: • This letter presents our professional opinion regarding the groundwater recharge mechanism at the wetlands area of the subject project. Based on our review of the site soils, recorded groundwater levels, and site elevations as presented in the referenced geotechnical report, it is our opinion that the water at the wetlands area north of the proposed building was recharged by surface runoff and not by means of the local groundwater table. ' The water surface at the wetlands area is at approximately Elevation +10 feet, while the local groundwater table was measured at Elevation +7 feet. In addition, the soils near the surface have a very low permeability, on the order of 6.25 x 10 '4 .cm/sec, such that very low rates of downward percolation can be achieved. If you have any further questions, please call. 5 1:-,:r. gr.,aw)1,11 > iJ Very truly yours, �o,,,,,,p ,,,� 1 i'.;p.; 0 f-3 j_89, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. ,t �o� Y1hsN,y l '� ("1,..% s LPN Architects & Planners .o.....„&a,......„: _al 1, ' ; h o k ..,......„:2'..;.-1 $ . . William Chang, P. E. �� ,� 2C114 ® 4Q N�� Project Manager "E''s F4'ls1t�4c.,`C. JO WC/krill • s%%NAL. t% ,r� --.'-�i�/00/0- ' I80!• 1arth('lace H Ii.,Suitt' 101, P!dtovur+•,Washington 98005 722( fIh Street, Suite 101• iarnma.Washington 98411.9998 #' ` ISmIr:•nn(:nc)c 1.13/10) Spathe(20(i)4114158/ (AY.(206)716 08130 Tacoma(206)272 6608 . . • . . i. '.I� i'.;';• . + COMPUTED BY �G DATED . f(5188 k:'• ; eloo) Earth E:;,Consultants Inc CHECKED BY DATED �i• .;. 1 Geeotechnleal EnAalneeeing and Geology PROJECT NO.D 149 0"iO SHEET_ OF/ SUBJECT 4)./Z//.�.t4 d ' A#ZA PROJECT /�-:PeAT•GG� L02/2/ (%IAA; ,•: 1 . . is • 14 6TLA1lp A2FA P iLbiRIG PAb . 71' r( • r E lev .+ 18.0 : . ' ,. SURFAc6 Wb7E.Q. Elev + Io.o .-_,y q Ji...-1 .. M 4.cv2C-d G,e0vNbW47e4, LPL&V. . ..4..7.2 . •• ,, ' , r • (A/or `Zo ScA16 , • ,. . ..: . .. : l 1 • t . 1 Slig • 1► Cs • CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman January 5, 1989 David Schuman The Schuman Company 16300 Christiansen Road, Building #3 Suite 219 Seattle, Washington 98188 RE: Rivertech Associates File No. SA-056-88 Dear Mr. Schuman: • The Examiner' s Rercrt regarding the referenced application which was published December 19 , 19 .: has riot been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, FRED J. KA MAN HEARING EXAMINER • FJK:dk cc: City Clerk Building Division Planning Division • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98q.5 - (20i) 235-2593 0 CITY OF RENTON oil HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman MEMORANDUM DATE: January 3, 1989 TO: All Parties of Record and Staff f/ FROM: FRED J. KAUFMAN, HEARING EXAMINER SUBJECT: Rivertech Associates - SA-056-88 The Decision issued on December 19, 1988 contains an error on Page 6. In the Decision portion, #5 should read: "Any water line installation along Naches Avenue shall be subject to the guidance of Conclusion 14 found above. " Will you please change your copy to reflect this correction. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) DOTTY KLINGMVAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 19th day of December , 1988 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 1 -ta day of , 1988 C Notary Publi< in and foT the State of Washington, residing at (- &-706177k.i , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: SA-056-88 - RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) • December 19, 1988 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES File No: SA-056-88 LOCATION: East of Naches Avenue S.W. and north of S.W. 7th at the termination of Powell Avenue S.W. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Site Approval to develop a three building complex with a total of 113,000 square feet. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval, with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on November 29, 1988. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on December 6, 1988 at 9:05 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Aerial Map • Exhibit #3 - Landscape Plan Exhibit #4 - Site Plan Exhibit #5 - Elevations of three-story building. Exhibit #6 - Elevations of one-story buildings. Exhibit #7 - Letter of Understanding dated November 30, 1987 between City and D.O.E. The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by the Zoning Administrator, Don Erickson. After reviewing the complete report for this proposal, the following persons testified: Royce Berg, 1127 Pine Street #300, Seattle, 98101: Shelly Anderson, 13618 S.E. 180th Street, Renton, 98058: Mary Louise Domek, 13515 Empire Way South, Seattle, 98178: David Schuman. 16300 Christiansen Road., Building 3, Suite 219, Seattle, 98188. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:00 A.M. Rivertech Associates SA-056-88 December 19, 1988 Page 2 • FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Rivertech Associates, filed a request for approval of a Site Plan consisting of three buildings on an approximately 10 acre site. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located east of Naches Avenue S.W. as extended, and north of S.W. 7th Street and the termination of Powell Avenue S.W. The site is bounded on the majority of its northern property line by the Pacific Coast Railroad line. 6. The site was annexed into the City by the adoption of Ordinance 1745, enacted in April, 1959, as amended by Ordinances 1756 and 1928, enacted in May, 1959 and December, 1961, respectively. 7. Ordinance 3694 adopted in December, 1982 reclassified the site from G (General; Single Family; Lot size - 35,000 sq ft) to M-P (Manufacturing Park). An area-wide reclassification of properties in this vicinity resulted in O-P (Office Park) being adopted for the subject site. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of Manufacturing Park use with an option for Office Park development. The map designation does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 9. Several other land use permits including a Preliminary Plat and Site Plan review, were approved but never acted upon by the then owners. 10. A Special Permit to fill and grade portions of the site was approved in May, 1986. Acting under authority granted by that permit the applicant began filling the site. During that action it was discovered that the site was subject to the Shoreline Master Program. The State Department of Ecology, as well as other agencies, became involved in reviewing the history of the site, its ecological significance and the applicability of the Shoreline Master Program. 11. The city has determined that the site is located within an area designated as an urban environment under the Shoreline Master Program. Urban environments along the shoreline may be used for high-intensity land uses including residential, commercial and industrial developments. 12. While filling certain portions of the site and surrounding area has degraded certain natural features, a significant wetland feature located immediately north of the subject site was only partially disturbed. This wetland is identified in a study of city wetlands as E 02/3 and E 2/3. Large Cottonwood trees (including some 60 inches to 72 inches in diameter) are located in or adjoining this wetland area. Rehabilitation recommended for the site did not necessarily require dredging but could include landscape enhancement in some fashion. 13. A drainage swale located along the south property line also contains significantly sized trees including several Cottonwoods 20 inches in diameter or greater, and Willow trees from 10 inches to 14 inches in diameter. 14. This office will not become involved in any lengthy discussion regarding the applicability of the city's wetland study. Adopted or not, it remains factual information subject to consideration. It remains subject to the refutation any evidence is subject to. The applicant has agreed to maintain a 50 foot buffer from the E 02/3 wetland which has a meandering margin along the north boundary of the subject site. 15. A 12 inch water main is located along S.W. 7th Street and the alignment of Naches Avenue S.W. A 12 inch sewer line is similarly located along those streets. • Rivertech Associates SA-056-88 December 19, 1988 Page 3 16. Storm water drainage can be conveyed to the Black River drainage system by the swale located on the south property line. Specific details of providing for the storm water discharge from the site were addressed by the ERC. The ERC required a system which recharges the area's ground water, after oil/water separation. The system was to include French drains or other acceptable recharge methods. The intent was to avoid a system of closed pipes or even surface ditches which merely conveyed the water to the swale along the south side of the property. Rather, the system was to permit the recharge of the ground waters all around the site, including the wetland area north of the site. 17. The applicant proposes three buildings on the subject site. The buildings will be placed along the east/west axis of the site. The westernmost building, Proposed Building 3, will be a wing or V-shaped building, three stories in height. The building is proposed to be a steel frame building finished in tinted glass. Detail treatment will utilize concrete banding and reflective glass elements around the entryways, and a brick masonry frieze at the roof line. A formal entrance with a plaza will be located along the south facade. Secondary entrances will be located along the north facades. This building will be approximately 45 feet tall. 18. Proposed buildings 2 and 3 will be located east of the three story building. Each of these buildings will be one story or approximately 20 ft. tall. Proposed building 2 will be approximately 17,705 square feet while proposed building 3 will be approximately 23,000 square feet. These two buildings will each be tilt-up concrete buildings finished in tinted glass. The concrete will be painted. The exterior treatment of these two buildings will be identical, while it will be complementary to proposed building 1 which is more ornate. The walls of both buildings will feature modulations and recessed wall panels to provide relief along the longer facades. These two buildings are intended to function as a unit, and the buildings are linked by walkways and a connected courtyard. 19. The applicant proposes approximately 15% lot coverage by buildings, and a total of approximately 23 to 24% coverage by impervious surfaces. 20. The applicant proposes providing 558 parking stalls of which 520 would be constructed immediately and 38 would be held in reserve. Some parking will be located along the outer edges of the site, but these areas will observe setbacks from wetlands on the north and from the drainage swale on the south. The parking along these margins will meander avoiding the sterile aspect presented by straight rows of curbs found in larger parking areas. Parking will also surround the three buildings. Landscaping will break the rows of parking periodically. 21. Native plants and trees will be preserved both north and south of the site in and along the wetlands and associated buffers, and along swales formed in these areas. The eastern taper created by the convergence of the rail line and the south property line will be maintained in its natural state. Supplementary plantings will be added to some of the natural landscaping along the perimeter of the site. The applicant intends to preserve some existing trees in the interior of the site, and buildings and parking areas have been designed or located to avoid some of these features. 22. The three buildings will be set in landscaped envelopes. Landscaped groupings of deciduous trees, flowering scrubs and evergreen trees will fill these envelopes. Again, some of the larger trees will be incorporated into these plans. Obviously some larger trees will yield to development, including some larger Cottonwood and Hawthorne trees. 23. A Heron rookery is located west of the subject site. The rookery contains approximately 40 Heron. The Heron have increased in numbers over the last two years from approximately 18 to 20 birds according to the current count. Various measures have been provided to permit the birds to be left generally undisturbed. There have been limitations placed on surrounding construction activity during the critical nesting period running from around mid to. late January through the fledgling departure around July. In spite of these restrictions development on a number of projects in the area has been permitted. In addition, development on other projects in the area has not had an apparent adverse affect on the rookery, although long term consequences have not been reviewed. 24. The ERC required the applicant to provide a bond to supplement the landscape buffer along the eastern edge of the Forebay Pond, with additional planting to screen the Heron rookery from the subject site. The staff and applicant agreed that this bond should be limited to Five Thousand Dollars ($5000.00). Rivertech Associates SA-056-88 December 19, 1988 Page 4 25. Again, some portions of the site have been filled under prior permits. A building pad for a previously approved but unconstructed building will be utilized for this new proposal. The applicant intends to accomplish some additional, although limited, filling and grading to accommodate accessi to and around the buildings as part of the development. No additional permit was applied for or requested for these purposes. The ERC limited any additional fill to not more than one (1) foot above the 100 year flood plain. 26. The P-1 Channel Fdrebay is located approximately 800 feet west of the subject site. The Heron rookery is also locatied at approximately the same 800 feet from the western edge of the subject site. The ERC precluded any construction work within 1200 feet of the rookery during the critical nesting periods. Similarly, the ERC precluded construction equipment from Naches during the same period. Screening, subject to city approval, might permit work to occur during certain periods. 27. While a visual landscape barrier exists between the site and rookery, there is some difference of opinion as to its effectiveness. The effectiveness is predicated upon a number of factors including its density, depth, tree specifies, canopy and scrub understory. In places, the trees are widely spaced over ,a depth of approximately 20 to 30 feet with a clear view of the pond and nesting areas from different perspectives. Bonding.for screening enhancement was a condition imposed by the ERC, as were conditions limiting the periods of construction based upon visual barriers. 28. The completed complex will generate approximately 17.7 vehicle trips per 1,000 square feet or approximately 2000 vehicle trips per day. This figure is obviously an estimate but was also used to reach an impact fee. As the applicant indicated, this figure should be based upon the actual square footage of the building with Renton's own characteristics factored into the vehicle count per thousand squareI feet. Experience has demonstrated that Boeing generates a higher than normal employee count which can equate with higher vehicle counts. 29. A number of recrea ional amenities have been proposed for the site. The applicant proposes incorporating a jogging path or walkway along the south edge of the subject site. The path would meander along the north edge of the landscaped swale. The applicant also proposes providing showers in the buildings to serve those who use lunch hours for active pursuits. Passive recreation needs would be met with sitting areas and picnic tables. 30. The ERC requested an easement for a trail through the site to connect with a trail system being created east of the site through a residential complex north of the rail line. A similar easement was provided by that complex and the applicant may wish to review that easement since it would provide the logical connection with this site. 31. The applicant modified the plans just prior to the public hearing, enlarging Proposed Building 1 from approximately 67,000 square feet to approximately 73,132 square feet. A complementary reduction of approximately 11,000 square feet occurred in Proposed Building 2, thereby scaling the entire proposal down by approximately 5,000 square feet, to a total development comprising some 113,000 squarEl feet. 32. The applicant requested permission to install water lines to serve a hydrant along Naches during the critical nesting eriod for the Heron. Water flow to a hydrant is required by the Fire Department prior to any substantial construction. 33. Migratory birds appear to frequent the general vicinity. CONCLUSIONS ' 1. The Site Plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformanc with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformanc with the Building d ng and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation o impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; • Rivertech Associates SA-056-88 December 19, 1988 Page 5 g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use. The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 2. In addition, proposed site plans must not adversely affect area-wide property values, must provide adequate air and light, and must not cause neighborhood deterioration or blight. The proposal appears to successfully satisfy these additional criteria. 3. The subject site presents the City with the opportunity to rectify some of the errors committed in dealing with the wetland environment found in the vicinity of the subject site. This can be accomplished by encouraging sensitive develop in the areas of this shoreline designated for urban development. Part of the fragile ecosystem has been disturbed, but some portions of the ecosystem including the wetland north of the subject site remain. Inappropriate development, too much impervious paving or inadequate storm water treatment could alter or destroy this northerly wetland, and could alter surrounding wetland remnants. The hydrology and recharge characteristics of the area are little studied and understood. Therefore, the conditions for setbacks and recharge imposed by the ERC must be complied with by the applicant. 4. Not only must storm water be treated before being discharged, it must be discharged in such a manner that it is not inappropriately channeled away from the wetland resulting in the desiccation and ultimate demise of the wetland. Channeling storm water to the drainage swale running along the southerly edge of the property will not assure the recharge of the E 02/3 and E 2/3 wetland area. Again, the impacts on the other wetlands in the area cannot be foreseen, but channeling storm water into discrete drainage channels more removed from the wetland areas probably would not be beneficial. Therefore, the applicant's plans will have to be reformulated to include French drains or some form of injection recharge system over those acres covered by impermeable asphalt, concrete or buildings. 5. The complex proposed by'the applicant would appear to take advantage of the amenities provided by this site. The buildings, even with a three story building, are relatively low-rise and well spaced. The three buildings will not overwhelm the site and appear to relate well to each other, especially the two one-story buildings which have identical exterior treatment. 6. Courtyards connect the two low-rise buildings, and formal entries define all of the buildings. The buildings are located in landscaped envelopes and the entire site is well landscaped. Along the south, the drainage swale contains some of the older and larger trees and additional plantings. Similarly, the north edge of the site protects the wetland abutting on the north and provides a relatively wide landscaped perimeter. These two landscaped property lines, the north and south, merge into one another and form the eastern taper which is also well landscaped. This eastern taper also provides for the passive recreation area with seating and tables. 7. The proposal is compatible with both the Comprehensive Plan and the Shoreline Plan. The former provides for high quality office parks in campus-type settings, while the latter designates this area of the shoreline for urban development. The plans, and this particular proposal, are complementary. We have a spacious landscaped campus with one larger three- story building and two smaller one-story buildings. They all appear to be well designed urban buildings which avoid sterile rectangular planes. 8. Extensive landscaping both along the periphery of the site and around the buildings will soften the appearance of the complex from the street. Similarly, the landscaping will serve to screen the site from surrounding development and enhance the park-like atmosphere for those using the buildings. 9. The well designed and detailed buildings should not only conserve property values but enhance property values. Development of this site will definitely not adversely affect property values of any surrounding developed properties. With the conditions imposed by the ERC and emphasized here, the various preserves, including the Forebay and Heron rookery, should not be adversely affected by this development. The Heron have survived some poorly executed filling, tree felling, grading and construction all around this area for the last two years. With heavy construction limited to less critical times of their nesting season, development of the site should not adversely affect the rookery. 10. The parking areas and limited driveways would appear to provide for adequate vehicular circulation. Additional sidewalk links to the 3-story building would appear appropriate to assist pedestrians in possibly moving to the low rise buildings to the east. While the jogging path is a nice amenity it will be too remote to serve as a link between the buildings. . • Rivertech Associates SA-056-88 December 19, 1988 Page 6 11. The buildings appear sufficiently set back from one another, especially the two low-rise buildings from the three-story building that adequate light and air should reach all occupants without impediment. 12. One issue which continues to represent an area of difficulty concerns the amount of parking. How much parking is necessary to serve sites such as this? The City's parking code provides specific ratios but allows some of the required parking to placed in reserve. The parking reserve arrangement supplements landscaping since it is separate and apart from the required landscaping. While adequate parking is apparently necessary to attract certain tenants, it also attracts greater automobile usage which increases traffic and decreases tenant attraction. Obviously additional parking also can eat into the amount of open space and add to the need for impermeable paving. The amount of reserve parking appears to be subject to applicant determination. The applicant proposes 558 parking stalls of which 520 would be constructed immediately and 38 would be held in reserve. If possible the number of reserved parking spaces should be increased to at least ten (10) percent of the entire complement. Obviously any measures which can reduce the amount,of traffic flowing into Renton would be beneficial, and a noble experiment here and there may be warranted. 13. In summary, urban development, especially in or adjacent to sensitive areas or shorelines, is a series of compromises. These buildings appear to be well designed, well landscaped and well situated to both take advantage of the sensitive site and to affect it as minimally as possible. The landscaped areas meander along the edges of the site respecting both the wetland to the north and the swale to the south without imposing a rigid geometry to the edges of the site. Landscaping and building placement have accommodated many, but not all, of the larger trees on the site. Quiet meditative places have been preserved and separated from urban forms, reflective glass, concrete detail work and parking areas. So, while urban development will be permitted on this site, significant natural features including wetlands and large trees will be protected. This proposal appears to successfully balance the economic and environmental interests at stake. 14. On the issue of the installation of water lines and a hydrant along Naches during the critical nesting period, the applicant should work with staff to find some alternative method of providing fire flow to the subject site. It might be possible to bring water to the site along Powell which intersects the middle of the site, or provide for a temporary line east of the Naches alignment. In any event, if deemed absolutely necessary, the applicant may install the line in Naches if agreement;can be reached between the various natural resource people from the state agencies, the applicant's Heron expert and a representative of the King County Audubon Society for a reasonable, quick and quiet method to construct the line. DECISION The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. Additional sidewalk links to the 3-story building and between the buildings and through the parking area shall be created as approved by staff. 3. If possible, the number of reserved parking spaces should be increased to at least ten (10) percent of the entire complement, and to fifteen percent if it is not unreasonable. 4. The applicant's plans shall incorporate either French drains or some form of injection recharge system over those acres covered by impermeable asphalt, concrete or buildings. 5. Any water line installation along Naches Avenue shall be subject to the guidance of Conclusion 13 found above. ORDERED THIS 19th day of December, 1988. FRED J. KA MAN HEARING E MINER Rivertech Associates SA-056-88 December 19, 1988 Page 7 TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of December, 1988 to the parties of record: Royce Berg ' 1127 Pine Street, #300 Seattle, WA 98101 Shelly Anderson 13618 S.E. 180th Street Renton, WA 98058 Mary Louise Domek 13515 Empire Way South Seattle, WA 98178 David Schuman 16300 Christiansen Road, Building 3 Suite 219, Seattle, WA 98188 TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of December, 1988 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Don Monaghan, Acting Engineering Supervisor Members, Renton Planning Commission Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney John Adamson, Developmental Program Coordinator. Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Valley Daily News Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015. of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. January 2. 1989. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. . Mi • 7t4,t` !- , Yid T .,J h '... w r1 , + ,... •,: - `., 0 •I1./T, i •3t • •..I� dR• -.7.-..- •-"Ite NX,............., I P le 441: 'all'i444 • ,' s il„'i 1 N _ ' i' g � e Iw t,- ( A') . . P - . . - .— — \ AP0-4.4A,Avt-f„,.. ,,grAfeg,,, ,,,,,,,t,- :. ,eir i is . - 111;i•i 3 A. n -44 ��44%t a r►: "�,,,.' ,. N 41, ���*t om ,,J o��� a ' .;1T. I .a • — � � r 1 I R-1 i . D-0371" SI , 1 ) ''' • :' ..F U J• �W . p w M �� f i • „,-___ .I re.,---% j 1 NACHES CENTER141:1— SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-056-88 N , . . , APPL I CANT RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA + 10 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS NACHES AVENUE .S.W. & POWELL AVENUE S.W. EXISTING ZONING O-P, OFFICE PARK EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF THREE (3) OFFICE BUILDINGS. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN . MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION. • COMMENTS • LOCATED AT THE 600 BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE S.W. TABULATIONii \ SITE AREA 2415,600 S.F. _ 4 . EIiLDING AREA x1/0,000 SF \ VICINITY MAP OF ADJACENT USES BULGING FOOTPRINT 271.3911 S.F. 1- ,.. COVERAGE x27% CUNADOPTED SITE COVERAGE 210% . \. WETLAND O� ExT�90n.- • PARKING • NACHES AVE�i `-- B STALLSSTANDARD 2322 • N. ;µai,TA..;..,"a ONN cower A2,1 STALLS(31S1%l - \ \ I ;NACNESfCENTER� it '""O Y'E_RN HANDICAP of STALLS• ,^ • -c!I;. . . . rl-e'771:•:--1. �_' LROAD TOTAL :SAT STALLS W• E,,,,������.���/,•. V ••--� 1,500 SF.EASED ON �R�.� �"'— )PHFJ.WITMN SEX ERRICEKI' ...` u�tt�� VICINITY MAP Z 1 . � I P•7XANariS• �" .I W TEAN FlDODFEAM I \ \v �� y5 �f :I. (I;�l �!'� r -t �p�x. 5d/ ,� E:�.�.. 1231" r Q �i NONiH SCALE ¢WEa /- Ui toot �r O rATV•4sry- /-`UNADOPTED , a ,` ``";`�� :•— )� ,'�'� Z U OOZ • / WETLANDco ` • -� �-—.�1 tf[1 Z • r.rE I \ rEr avEtax _�.r•vw..v-� 3. U O _ SOWN if \ imillS MIf 1S Or ]10.60 ` / WIDOW I l f' i I t f sal I I l`I i i I.i i i i=uS i �. ....--•-• — - -„ LEGEND ,N L CC �/�/'/_r •TREES TO[E REMOVED �1 U;tires I. r n r!I s j'(�•! i ds:. ;/ •MIS TO SE n Ea[nreD NORTH I= , I Q./ A .ti...._..X F o t•--��1 I i f --•n' - \` ��.. ...` .PAIN�wHrs E. ' I , I-•'-'.h I AI ,.I I _U V I p s / .', �: 1C g /:; i.WIC.SA= 1 \ i ` .°' -` micro, a.eNer, I • I 'i i I �> „(^I''r 1~_ j. ':I! '<.•_•_iJ/ \ '/ '��y� ` \ �RT/f / 0••EXISTING STREET I GHT I1„....--.L"•-•-...„: J - • - / y • fRN Q• ,�+ — • 17> .• 1 t ! '/ ` _ A4gR EXISTING ME - ! ...s• `SV-0 _J_r. 'as ..� I. / j, 1;�- D4 TR,C MOMSFD Sr11FET UfM , I S = s. _ ^-• _ - •�-�- Kg �FNOFosEO Ewe xroxANr = — • --) Ina' �I.•�/! \ -��� -� � TES -'�`. Y. at'ce K...2 1 z{TD00 •E1TflJ % --� .J 9 3 / Jr' -�'`_ � \�=��=_�1 Hy .;," -,..., :i-,,.-.gal 11!!Itw" �. A r_J�• gel � '�� I`llJ, l •Jl •r ,'I'1_• a\ . j ice`• •�,I 1_ 1 1 1-I- - !I 'L• i. 1 _- -•..,,w--.t �� ,-,-.� __ -- _ _ `\_1 ! • . 'J ,/ • I;, `t. \....1 - ,/� iIr ! _\ -' .. A .� _ \, �.• Y I(•3 s:II I •.I• !!II I e `er---..y' IE� / \\ IT ``r•---- IIV+'.90-yrsaits _ - - --_" _ ... `I I - -a:. —_ H➢ ��" a�>e.�a ` '�— i[S•,D-aa•r[tar • (—...\____) `--_ I' �l..n_ L.Is _- �' If..,-,.,-- „mac �`.['_� \ __�^_ / �i _ N+= lXL1ir1O d1AMAGESYIEJ / EX�T[q A' .mr tll TD�- `, .•ttD ACCESS YAwTENANCE EASEMENT 'I I _-� - ,.:• - _.:a C •��•..- - __ ui y,l y u �.r Ae'w. ao•PIPE/SE A rNucroNn ? (1 t I�'%� 7-1 n 1 al x; e v .o r Ex OF OE AM GAS EA[oE>IT I S 1 ND.DESCx Tg uTE .. a'Err;''''.ueI �,I I Im v ofyw.c yo4o UII i,'I07 r eos,.O[ILMq EXISTING'SIS.D[ID. a I 01 I . • • _I /// l • NACHES CENTER / 6! !a I' �� . . `� :� I THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES SITE PLAN DNAMAGE StAALE q / =Ib,. Wios •••� W•ig _p . . -"% = RENTON.WASHINGION EMEND SUIDIGL^x A: / '( i 0 IS ISO 100 ,.-. —0 • • `PROPOSED GRADS SITE PLAN \ VOWING GRADE / SITE SECTION A v5D• .OE 0104001A SHEET NO 0E DATE .vo-e OMAN.,. 1 Of s CHECA•rm. .._ .i • . . 1 . 1 . .. . .... . ,, ,. ,..,... ,.. . \ 1••• . -\ PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND . ... . . - . . . \ \ • (.9 .....,,or.,,,./ralso..42.....1.0...irgoo.„0„...,--o go-1.M.-,40•••••• mr,100'.r ,-0•714./titalt• • • „......\: ., . . . • : . . • \,... • cf.) 0 .......47.--7-;.....--.74:1.L1r7SCE,'7/1to,k14-H1'44''.4 1.27.1....4.0041:4.4 ha-41-44. •••,0•12,-,rt....no...A-,0.e.•••••$••••+Z.,....MY,I....".r•',..{.4,,..;.,..at= CD . .\ uan.W.d.-1.....y" ...di,,',0,..... frOol atA0 64A0..fL,....43••esz•PA....r-P1,..e. LLI . - • .\\ •• • ZI724. Cia2o4;1,A,E22.Uat... 6•id P•1"_ - . • \ . . . . . \\ Cts41..4>/ef 1_ ..p•-•••-•&-•••••4 -04,0,-7-6.mazoalai',Paden,4P.144.ol,•,,,,4-4,•-;,04440 alt c"...") .4-•"..a•-•-,,p'...-oil,-4A-,...~.e.-,9%.1.,,a-Cai•farlta^,14•0a.S.0•PA4F••( g.N41....",P.A7 0...e ?-,A....,V,-,.......t.„~-i cealcii CC a.. . 11.1 2 \ ..,,,....„„„r,..,,,,•,-, .:,.....,..,...„,..• ..,,,.W••••-Iv... -U.:"-.A.,..‘7, .:>•;c1....,40>•• , :O. ....NPIOW.L:n•-ltUr,,,,I,I&et,6'4.'4r-4. al•• -7"VP,> 0"au - •••...,,s.arn7 •\-.- 0 i • sC. t!:...: .:.:T••••••.+1,•ICNWCO 6‘.•A•V 7c4,0•Iff Cli ...16,••4..1 GO P•ra.,.....5.,14, 1101Z i 'T.,..11,1 \ -.i. um0,9•4.1., 0.01,-,Gio•kor..././ 1 -5,-./1 retc-0•11, 10- . , ,,,,,o I e...., • ‘ 0 < Z • Anrirratrar, -a.••••f;-•, -4:10•1•-f.,44„ - ...A-5; . \ 4,4 907:44•M pr•t.,a4,r • . • \.' =....4 E i , ... _ • .• ....___. ,... H,et,.,• ,-‘ ,.. ..,. . • • .. Q_. ., ,„. 0,.*.„-&-r-s....rt ct...K f-1.44,...... , la 66 •••00,..9 NI . •--. P•LACAPSI *-4,1)4 e0 6- 1.4.1.." W = -, e•"*. \ \ \,\‘', : 1 \ \ • - - (-2; ) s• . -, , - - ..•....t>.•••••;‘`.-, ''. C), ...• .(.1 l' 1 ; .... 6:1:6.f..-., ' - ..a&tr:6•••••..------- , _ •four(%SPX •. ........„.......... . - \ 4.1 -10--......, • • -,-- wk. . .....„, — L.I.J , , ••,...„ . ..., _ . . , ,... ..,-in • ...„. r..11- ii.;i:i.v;..1:: ci;•,;, , ...."-_---... ...—•:••••,••• ...:.....: Z I-- CC ‘i\1 iltr -...A-v. A.A.-A.... ,---, ..0-,...-,......., . 0............4.........,, ,,, •,• r, ,. •.._ , ____ ....••••eiris..7. •It.•411 ....., ../.1 . . ,6&.1: 6.••=4,- 161 , ' '.. • . ., 0.... ,..10;ir '..".Rif..: I I"'.41.1:•i / / 1,••1.-mr...) . I 1 • •-•.gelfzi\vmpipwself— =liftrfWm"`-'-f--Vilkiiiibi_•. . _ ag.‘,.;..,a4c-.... ...6,- ___,-----___A.0...2._.,,,,,,,,,.. — ger4.4-S4 . > . . •-- . 1 1- *-------1,14,-10: -qrs.. ''''i ,,,,/. -, -•-•'--:-- _,-.-..- -L-4-ND r .......4,•-,..T....e.: cop• r.....-t...a.a,7 ' • Ole a.........., ?itieve." . I/ / /-•-k.....„.;.1::--.- --&.F.lcS 6,04-ripl.) 4 I tt. 1.___ c• ..«. ..........-. it 2 .. .5• V - .. • .....,_:., ..R- •,7 ......a.c • 11 t, -..,.ged.,„,___ ii ..--...- .--.. . - .,..,:i._.. _. • . i .z.....A..._ _ iii 4..../.• ....-.: ,,,:-.. -_____. .< .,, 2 I lt I:-'.---' N''.141.;GAFGCGLSI Ay...._. r 7: : : 'ir. MI• , • .v,.......i.,,,,,..:-.., ."' -••,(: _ ---..... - •i • - Ili . lti .,...,,,.'- . A mr........•••40, _ ""-"11.00141 .• . UP . .,, „,M4 .) 3- "•••!;:•........ "------:._-_-- 11.1 -./AZ' -:_•------;:------- __.---------._.r..---,-,,__,.__- ' ,,,, . ... ----..........._ ..,,zr -it//,. or- "tii/6:. .--,...•-'. `4.--.5,.------7•• _ 1 I '11,...ilm Itillareisiss.-Q•t . ,.......filti- git i I I 11-Ili , ..1,emi-•- •-ji,,_ 0 .....*....at • — --- -'- -N..ffsiv,-..,-T,0„„,,7-- • . \ --.:..---7 7-- go - I I :241a0•*.e-I.°die mb.i 1 i i (.1. --- -10.4..,' .93".•11.....*-- -...-- r ••••., : 4,/- •. 1_ I w-... .:1111''!!. -timb.fil. ,. Vt ., ;.01\,,,, . 2nril61.,,,,,...,, , • ./,/ ' • k -•-•AriwO—. -'''' '401001fr --,.,..___ff...41/- ''• 'Frr r-,.. - , :.'.A...F..‘,• '01.14,/' /4-ti - --''s-------z---_ --- .,, , /. t._. IiI *----;V,,. -"------:-4'. _. . --.8seaga,,--111.-_,..iwgiogalb.,$0.-- ...t-_---_-_,,,,,,.— -INN..- • ._ gLaLuLAIIIIIIIIIIII wilii.a .„...,....,„43;b00.5 • ...,_‘,____________-_,..,,„• . ..,....., .. ......_ ____ _ 4,.. , ...„,....:......:.,. _ -- ... . • rr 7'1'?tcVr'' r.g../-.., ,z.i,..71i!,-"tfiii. --- -•---- -77- ---.,,,,; --_____'-, ............. • -- i'.••72s.w...sr : I/ _ ,.. N.. . L EXISTING GRA/WM SWALE-/_// LIST•In SW EAMISMIIST.IBM ' . I i -•„*.E.T.f 7.,-.-.... / .:".....,-- a---: . I . ACCESS MAPITENAIICE EASDAEPT En • C.. in-JE , .....- ., to'.../r.W 0-4 a>P.a.&•TRAFP.OR`ATIFTE .1__11__ FI__7.-'7-7,--.n CPS F•SIMEIET ' I i. NI 1 .• I 1 I ..•••' I ra . NO DESCRIPTION DATE ' •.. . • I I 1 r EXISTING SULDGIG Li ri EXISTS.MUM° X . 0•111k• 4....fl ei.1 . r • I I LEGEND . • • NACHES CENTER - The LANDSCAPE PLAN •Pell I.I.ITS -ps,..11 ISA, /\ '' THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES Mitchell Nelson s c241,2,, MI Of 1.21 IPri . Group ..7 IZZ' /50 ,00' ..s.c..c. ,•.....•t•. -RENTON,WASHINGTON Iniorporated _ . ...,:i.MA./,‘,/••1 Lai No, .4:17-.. IQ/Pine Sn•or.S...100 Stri.,110•051,100•51310.1:1 la•Floap.ANeao . UA...... . I LANDSCAPE PLAN 3,115.111o....5•••IM Seale.Wahnso.IN. ''.".:attr 9!.. WV•11.61,61 . .104.0 6801.1 Y..,p•D OF • OP"1:17.e' 7 of 9 . • . i 4. U!) W i 157 z .1, y 224'.10• I /Z 77-9' r 59'•5' • I 77-9• 469'-6' 77-9• ! CC LL I Brick Panel Mechanical Screen— Concrete Panel {—Tinted Glass W 2 II I � --_ II _ 1 1 Z V z Ilnilll 1111[111111r� � i IN I 1 � lllll 11111 � I� I,l� II -I 1!J Z z_ 1 ii II �! ! 11 /� 11) (ilil 1 . i I 1 I 1; �� �` R 2 H—' I i i I v/ 1 I .II 1 'ill I I Reflective Glass--� .--Main Entry 0 0 Cr 1 W BLDG.1 EAST ELEVATION BLDG.1 SOUTH ELEVATION Z i' CC e, 224 10• a 137-2' - 59'-5' % 53,0' __F__ 57-0_ �_59_5- 1 59,5' i 7T•9' I I : I I I I 1 I - ~ *� � �� I I�, -I 1 � I I �- { 1 (! ! !1\! !! ! !! ! � :l1l�I 1 I � �4 (-3 J __ _ 1 1 , 1 1 1 i 1 1 I HI ,5?=11 , .. ! Secondary Entry—' Secondary Entry— . BLDG.1 NORTH ELEVATION - BLDG.1 WEST ELEVATION {- I NACHES CENTER THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES BLDG.ELEVA�ONS ., RENTON,WASHINGTON x, ELEVATIONS BLDG.1 ,o..o-MO.. SWAT NO OF ''''''',.68 of g _ .._ ... _. — , ..• . . • ' • . 120' 310' e it, I45' 128' I 1 I (r) - ---1-1-1, i , , r r , " .. ! •I f Fr Il II 1 17:11 .1 jzpii UJ ii ti ii il ii il ,.- i iiiii win !:,.!#r,i.._ _,11 i i 141::_iil El 'i i CC a. BLDG.2 WEST ELEVATION k BLDG.2 SOUTH ELEVATION W 2 / 310 t 120 i' 0 I Z c-) 6 ,, , 145' 't 90' ' I I 1 I t . UJ Z 01- ' : ' . 0 < ,, ! ,' „P .----r-' E -T , • J. , . ....- 1: . cn , LLI = BLDG.2 NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.2 EAST ELEVATION = C) - (i) Z BUILDING 2 0 0 < *I — Lu _ Z i— CC Painted Tilt Up Concrete Panel-1 Tinted Glass Reflective Glass - / -,-,:.---- -,-.- 128' 270' ' ' 1 '1' I i ! --, _,-.—.--7 —, :•,'"i:.....?....t.',.:;-'::: , 7 71-1:1 il 111 l' 111 li 1"--731 I 4k.l." #ti • , op DEDDRIFTEDI DATE BLDG. 3 WEST ELEVATION Entry(typ.)_ BLDG.3 SOUTH ELEVATION le.....<0... 277 1 I se ; I " :•7:-,:..T_L--; -- - :r.tt'• i LHirI-17.717. 1 iril7,7 F-177,-r1 . IRT11.-7- -11r17I 7I 7 1irl , . - — A BLDG.3 NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.3 EAST ELEVATION A BUILDING 3 . - NACHES CENTER . .' --,7417- • THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES BUMS.2&3 • - ._•.,-..ee,.... e.,-,- ....-.7, 'Fo... RENTON,WASHINGTON . • • , , ,7:7". :.: - - i ' ELEVATIONS BLOCS.2&3 :4---,-7-cCF.:...-,,E.::: ::_,:,..z.::-..q-,.----=,i-•:-7-:f.ft•-s---,-;---: - - 4 JOD MOSSOTA ,Doll DO OF • . ,.• '-j;;F4F-1:4-&--;5'3.ti., f-ti4--.F: -.. . DATE V n 9 Moog.e, of CDECal•PL.. �y .� CITY OF RENTON NLL • POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor EX IRIT NO. 7 . -- --- ITEM NO. ‘.5.4,1 s e ' November 30, 1987 ,, Mr. Joe Williams Department of Ecology Shorelines Division M/S PV-11 Olympia, Wa. 98504 . Subject: Black River Riparian Forest/First City Equities Dear Joe: On Friday, November 13 , Terra Prodan and Mary Berg of your staff met with Nancy Laswell Morris, Don Erickson and myself to discuss the status of the stop work/administrative orders on the Black River Corporate Park property and the status of the City's Shoreline Master Program for this area. The following memorializes our understanding of the information exchanged during this meeting. 1. It was agreed by the City and DOE that the Williams/Canning Study done in 1981 and submitted as part of the City's Shoreline Amendment in 1983 is probably an accurate depiction of the types and extent of wetlands on the property. 2 It was acknowledged that the natural and urban designations established by the 1983 Amendment are unclear, and that a primary purpose of the meeting. is to establish shorelines boundaries and designations which respect the natural ecosystems, on-site resources, and objectives of the state program. 3. It was agreed that the City's Shoreline Master Program for this area will be amended to reflect present and historic resource values (resources which were present when First City Equities purchased the property in December 1985) and that the substantial development permit for this project will be issued in conformance with the proposed amendment. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 \ , Memorandum of Understanding Department of Ecology - City of Renton First City Equities Substantial Development Permit Page 2 (Note: The City has received an application for a substantial development permit for fill and grade (SP-024- 86) under the existing City Shoreline Master Program. It is possible that the developer would request that a substantial development permit be processed under the current program. This program has been interpreted to designate the entire shoreline west of the confluence of the Black River and Springbrook Creek and associated wetlands as natural, and the shoreline and associated wetlands east of the confluence as urban. ) 4. It was acknowledged that the City and the State both desire to negotiate a compromise position on the development of the First City Equities' property which could accomplish the following two goals: to protect the integrity.-and functions of the Black River Forest/wetland area and to allow reasonable office park development pursuant to the granted rezone. 5. Terra suggested and it was generally acknowledged that the acreage donated by First City Equities/Alterra Corporation for the P-1 Pond is not mitigation for the wetlands loss from this development but is mitigation for flood hazard for the P-1 channel. She noted that the EIS for the P-1 project stated that the P-1 pond was mitigation for the P-i channel/Eastside Watershed flood control program. Don noted that the rezone agreement between the City and Alterra also credited the "Black River" site with the flood storage capacity of the "flood control property" . 6. Terra and Mary presented DOE's position on the shoreline, defining from the state's perspective those areas which should be off-limits to development and those which could allow development subject to mitigation. This state position includes three levels of action: a. Replacement of that portion of the wetland which fell into the historical natural area (the area west of a north/south line from the confluence of the Black River and Springbrook Creek) on an acre for acre basis by trading off portions of the western part of the site for more sensitive areas on the eastern part. This acre for acre trade-off was understood to be a minimum requirement for replacement. (The inter-agency meeting which occurred on 11/6/87 addressed this issue at which time the natural area was defined to not include that area which had been filled by SCS pursuant to an issued permit) . b. Restoration and enhancement of the preservation/ replacement areas which protects resources, provides diversity, and satisfies the needs of the resource agencies; and Memorandum of Understanding Department of Ecology - City of Renton First City Equities Substantial Development Permit Page 3 c. Mitigation within the developable area for lost wetlands, including the wetlands lost in the western portion of the property which was not placed under a stop work order by DOE. 7. DOE presented a series of overlays to define the acre for acre preservation/restoration area. This area was presented to the City as a minimum for required preservation, and is not to be construed as a preliminary negotiating position. The purpose of this preservation and restoration area is to (1) define the natural designation on the 1983 shoreline program; and (2) define the area which needs to be rehabilitated pursuant to the administrative order. A. BLACK represents the property line. • B. GREEN represents the current preserve area which was required pursuant to the 1984 rezone. , C. RED defines the line 200 feet from the ordinary high water mark of the P-i pond/Black River. D. ORANGE defines the line 600 feet from the center of the heron rookery. E. BLUE identifies the rehabilitation/enhancement area and includes the S4 , E 02/3 and E 2/3 areas delineated on the Canning/Williams study. 8. In addition to the preservation/rehabilitation areas which are identified above, DOE stated that any substantial development permit must include mitigation which would make the development sensitive to the wetlands. DOE suggested that the proposed Shoreline Master Program amendment which will clarify the uses for this area should include a formal policy basis for this mitigation. DOE suggested the following types of language and mitigation measures in order to meet the objectives of the state legislation: a. In order to preserve the on-site groundwater and surface water hydrology to the greatest extent feasible, the following measures and policy were suggested: 1. Avoid fill to the greatest extent feasible.. 2. Require buildings and roads in the existing wetlands areas to be constructed using pilings rather than structural fill. 3 . Permit alterations of and impacts to the soils only in areas proposed for buildings. /. .sw y� :• Memorandum of Understanding Department of Ecology - City of Renton First City Equities Substantial Development Permit Page 4 • 4. Limit impervious surface coverage by encouraging pervious paving for all at-grade parking and by minimizing the widths of roads. 5. Require a minimum setback of 50 feet from all preservation/restoration areas within which no buildings or impervious surfaces may be placed. This buffer area may include shallow ponds, natural or ornamental vegetation, trails and other low intensity amenity areas. 6. All building placement should be sensitive to the latest floodplain map from FEMA (CH2M Hill) . 7. Encourage all buildings to be floodproofed with techniques which avoid or minimize soil compaction: b. In order to buffer the preservation/restoration areas from human encroachment the following measures were suggested: 1. Use a combination of ponds and natural vegetation barriers to limit movement into and through the wetlands and riparian forest. (Mary would like to see existing blackberry bushes removed. ) 2. Prohibit access into the wetlands and riparian forest during the breeding and fledgling season (January through July) to avoid conflicts with the heron rookery. 3. Strictly limit access into the riparian forest to pre-approved individuals or groups and for scientific or educational purposes. c. In order to enhance the riparian forest/wetland preservation areas and restore their heritage value the following measures were suggested: 1. Enhance the riparian forest by low impact weed removal. 2. Enhance the heron rookery by carefully placing nesting platforms in the riparian forest preserve. 3 . Replant the S4 , E 02/3 and E2/3 areas with ' • native vegetation of the same types and proportions as were reported in the 1981• Canning/Williams study. 4 . Maintain adequate on-site diversity of wetlands types to maximize habitat value. 5. Create additional on-site diversity by carefully designing and planting landscape buffers to include natural barriers, emergent wetland areas, and diverse habitat/food species. • . Memorandum of Understanding Department of Ecology - City of Renton First City Equities Substantial Development Permit Page 5 d. It was also suggested that the City investigate mitigation alternatives which consider and include off-site mitigation for loss of wetlands in the development areas. The City of Renton recognizes that the First City Equities project will require a substantial development permit under the City's Shoreline Master Program in order to proceed. The City is proposing to concurrently amend the Shoreline Master Program, in order to process the permit in conformance with the clarification of the designation and new policy language. (As noted above, First City Equities could claim to be vested with the right to process their substantial development permit application under the 1983 program. ) In addition, the administrative order which requires rehabilitation and restoration of damaged areas as defined and agreed to by the City and DOE must be carried out by First City to the satisfaction of the Department of Ecology. (Note: First City has agreed to the restoration of "natural" areas if they concur with the City's and State's interpretation) . The City appreciates the time and effort which Terra and Mary have expended in lending their expertise to the problem of clarifying the extent of the associated wetlands and the natural areas. While this memo does not signal the City's agreement with the requirements set forth by DOE during this meeting, it is the intent of the City to reach an understanding of Ecology's direction in order to move forward expeditiously on both the proposed Shoreline Amendment and the substantial development permit. Sincerely, Larry M. Springer Policy Development Director Ron Nelson, Building and Zoning Director MODEFCE.doc • ,•' , . ,.. • • _,„ .. . • •..,... - • ' --,..-,4):...e.-21.1-.-7,,:_•':2-•::•••••'•••.:`?71).7,”.•,•"•'-'7"---- . . . •-..,--....,••?:-.7.•:•••07,5•..?.77)..,-ft..... ....-,,,--......-- -.- ' • • . . . . . . ' . . . 1 . 4ii5.:F.':7..:.7....:_M-.M • i -_-,....-...._........:. • ,4:' --_-_57:7._-=----_,:,,,•...::t • 4 ....:.••••• -.._._--L-a--_-_-=-.-.-.--7--- ,:i::: 1 • 4.f:::::::::::::::::iii;;.r_niati;; •.. •. . dk?' /5-VMOWCW.;41:11:1111::::.::P . :**;;I'''irc• -'•ilgi,'...........r! '' ......"''''"'"...;•!'‘ ec:.',"::•;e..'... 1v.k,,.•iPUF...2.......... .. .'71:jj'::N. • RS\ r...'''''"'..gCsV9:".itillill416.,..--....f..-;....,:-.",:e--- • •;••••;;;;••.::: . .. ',11eM.N. - „„64i3'.11:.427sIg211111!E;t3t7g=n7 ' glggg:::0 .• -s.,;•-.,....:„. ,:.....„.;:;:.,-,•• ...,• •-.:.-..,,,,,,,...:.v.p--vil.,....1.7,-,..x.r.5:44#1-0 • •:,,,,,...s...,...,1 .r., •••••••• 4.".f.7'-lraip.::.7'...::".•:,..ii..7.,:"„„..::::...........: . ./...-,. '-'de:rer-/r":4 P••••'...V4•.:'-'7'...C..5..,:•.::, • e„.V.,4:::1A P. „ta,- .'..*.. • 4:6:::snami::::.1 ' "....ei".,/,/e". ••••--',, /-4,101;1%.":;:,..::•:::.i.t%;1''' . . .2:::',VA:::::::. ? .....,/ '4,:•.:05!..-4%=" .."..:.:0:4,••1111•1111.,:i • •• . • ..;' -4,.....,,, 44•02...,,,r.M•••••...... • . e..fro.V.7,i•In[•••:.?, . ,..e.,".01•1111.n.......:1 , ,i0:054,1nami•ONN•:••.• • • !..,!.%VA N•M•0•••.....5 • • • • '''-'-':g%3........f V ._ . • -.:-.1:111111.g '.-. . . • . .. . . .. . ...„ . . . . . . • PROPERTY BOUNDARY • . . • • . • ... • . . •• . . • . • • i ..-;•:,;•,- • . • •• . .• BLACK , . • .. • . . RIVER CORPORATE PARK . . I ••••,--, 1 . /4 200 FROM SHORELINE(RED) ••••••. . , • .........-....••• . ...,..„,...........••.•—• . .,,,,,,,,,' . .• 600'FROM HERON ROOKERY(ORANGE) ,-_-;---__3,--;=_:„.:•_. ,. BUFFER AREA . ' .• • •4:,..,:-.:e.,7,14..-' • ...=._ --" ..: • . • -5,.,re,_,..•.v.• . ,'. '•`•-=''.°' .. - S4 and E 02/3(ELUE) ., • PRESERVE(GREEN)• — -Z\ . • DEVELOPABLE ' NORTH •:•=1;I': • • . - ',4•1, 1 gel lOW 0 CITY OF RENTON • DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION December 13, 1988 Mr. David Schuman The Schuman Company Building 3, Suite 219 16300 Christianson Road Seattle, WA 98188 Re: Rivertech Associates - Naches Center ECF; SA; SM-056-88 Dear Mr. Schuman: Per your request this date, transmitted herein are copies of the following correspondence regarding the above noted project: 1. November 30, 1987 letter from Ron Nelson to Joe Williams, •Department of Ecology. 2 . September 2, 1988 letter from Department of Ecology to Don Erickson. Should you have any questions please contact my office. 4/t_. Donald K. ickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp Enclosures (As Noted) 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION December 7 , 1988 Jeffrey D. Goltz Lane Powell Moss & Miller Evergreen Plaza Building 711 Capitol Way Olympia, WA 98501 Re: Rivertech Associates - Naches Center ECF; SA; SM-056-88 Dear Mr. Goltz : Per your November 28, 1988 request, transmitted herein are copies of the following correspondence regarding the above noted project: 1. November 30, 1987 letter from Ron Nelson to Joe Williams, - Department of Ecology. 2 . September 2 , 1988 letter from Department of Ecology to Don Erickson. Should you have any questions please contact my office. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp Enclosures (as noted) 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 .. , O F R4, n el..... . .:z_, • ( 0 ) • SEP City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a • . . . .I: • . .. , . . ,. . . • • ., NEARING • .. . ,,„ . . • „ CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL } ON DECEMBER 6, 1988 BEGINNING AT 9:OOA.M. . P.M. • • ECF-056-88, SA-056-88, SM-056-88 f CONCERNING: RIVERTECH(AMENDED) ASSOCIATES-NACHES CF�NTER • ' APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF THREE BUILDINGS; A THREE-STORY OFFICE BUILDING OF 67,000 SQ.FT. , • 1. AND TWO ONE-STORY OFFICE/R&D BUILDINGS WITH 28,000 SQ.FT. AND . 23,000. SQ.FT., RESPECTIVELY. . OI--L1-1ChPi ' • 7r/,) }� /jJJflJjl • ��r' �v �» / .,jam -N 1 ''' haiNk1Irek i -- j j : Jr'�r cJ� � fi�100J/Agilli'if / 4. r ! *tIL ' /' V : ' 14'.'` aR` Nr;• • 1 • • P -.c .i........ ;i.......... i ' ti 1 M—p ,t,,, e <iI ` , \ r tl. i. r:" ... 1=, I ° "ram rtl • GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE 600 BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE SW. • • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON • • BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 ' ' ' THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT • . PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I , NET) LI► , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT FI J ( 5) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN floe ( 5 ) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON i\XXV, 2_.q— [as? ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington •(4 ,SIGNED : 6v..,..A.,./q., u,,,,:aresiding in `j e4]TQ &J , on the �Cjday of LOv , l CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9 :00 AM, DECEMBER, 6, 1988 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed below are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. UNION SQUARE ASSOCIATES ECF; SP-041-88 Applicant seeks permit to: a) haul 8, 100 cu.yds. of duff off of the site to a suitable disposal area; b) relocate 30,000 cu.yds. of fill within the site area; and c) import 21, 000 cu.yds. of suitable fill to complete the grading of the site. The property is located on the north side of NE 4th Street, west of Duvall Avenue NE. RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES-NACHES CENTER (AMENDED) ECF; SA; SM-056-88 Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three buildings; a three-story office building of 67, 000 sq. ft. , and two one-story office/R & D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft. and 23, 000 sq. ft. , respectively. The property is located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue SW. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (REVISED MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-056-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SM-056-88 PROPONENT: RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three build- ings; a 3 story office building of 67, 000 sq. ft. , and one-story office/ R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft. and 23, 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue SW. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030(2) (c) . Upon a remand from the Renton Hearing Examiner, revised conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee on November 2, 1988, under their ` authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . A Threshold Determination was issued on August 17, 1988. Comments were received during a fifteen (15) day comment period which ended on September 6, 1988. A DNS with modified mitigation measures and new conditions were adopted by the Environmental Review Committee. There was a 14 day appeal period which ended October 17, 1988 during which time the proponent submitted an appeal. A Hearing Examiner public hearing was scheduled for November 1, 1988 at which time the project was remanded to the Environmental Review Committee to revise the conditions of the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated previously issued. On November 2, 1988 the Environmental Review Committee revised the conditions and issued an amended Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated with a 14 day appeal period. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: November 7, 1988 DATE OF DECISION: November 2, 1988 SIGNATURES: / - Ronald G. Nelson arry `'Spri r ' Building Of 'ici- Planning Ma ger � e , " •/ cting P i• . - arks-D. - - - DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (RECONSIDERATION) MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Rivertech Associates ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-056-88 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-056-88, SM-056-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three building: a 3 story office building of 67, 000 sq. ft. , and 2 one-story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft. and 23, 000. sq. ft. respectively. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue S.W. DETERMINATION: Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: ' 1. That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner to ensure that, to the greatest extent possible, as many; of the significant trees on the site are retained as specified in the FEIS for the Blackriver rezone application. NOTE: Per the FEIS, a minimum of 20% of the site is required to be landscaped with continuous natural landscape materials and large trees may need to be placed in tree wells to protect them. 2 . That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner on revising the landscaping plan to include plants species which will provide sources of food for birds and small animals per the recommendations in the FEIS for Blackriver. 3 . That the applicant limit fill material to building pads and landings and that the applicant place only clean fill within these portions of the site. Said filling shall not exceed the 100 year floodplain level, plus one (1) foot. This material shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to it's disposition on site. NOTE: Minor grading of parking areas will be allowed sufficient to allow this use. 4. That the applicant work with the Police Department and the Public Works Department on appropriate haul routes through the City. Trucks will not be allowed to use the roadway (proposed Naches Avenue right-of-way) through the Black River site north of the Forebay area between January 23rd or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left the nests. 4. " ' Mitigation Measures Rivertech Associates Page 2 5. That the applicant limit the operation of construction equipment to the hours between 7 : 00 a.m. and 7: 00 p.m. , Monday through Friday per the Blackriver FEIS and that no construction activity shall be allowed within a 1, 200 foot radius of the Heron rookery (to the west of the site) between January 23rd, or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left their nests unless full visual screening, approved by the City, is provided to block construction activity, including glare from welding activity or unshielded light sources having an intensity greater than 100 watts. 6. That the applicant shall provide bonding, funding or other security acceptable to the City Attorney sufficient to ensure the planting of a treed buffer within the greenbelt easement to the west along the edge of the old Black River Channel, which will, at maturity, visually screen the Heron rookery from the subject site. NOTE: The applicant or his landscape architect should meet with the City's landscape planner to develop a plan acceptable to the City from which cost estimates for this improvement can be derived. 7 . That the applicant shall work with Metro to develop a TSM program and shall submit a copy to the City prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy permit. 8. That the applicant shall reduce the number of proposed (547 stalls) parking stalls by 70 stalls by eliminating 45 of the parking stalls and placing 25 stalls into a landscaped reserve per Section 4-2208 (12) . NOTE: The reduction of parking stalls is based upon an 85% efficiency, a standard for industrial developments of this type. To the greatest extent possible the majority of the parking stalls shall be eliminated in the eastern portion of the site near the recreation area. The applicant shall work with the landscape planner on the location of the specific stalls to be eliminated. 9. That the applicant provide the City with a bond or other means acceptable to the City Attorney for their fair share of traffic improvement costs for the Grady Way Benefit area in the amount of approximately $146, 202 . 00 which shall be paid prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. NOTE: The above figure shall be adjusted to reflect a new trip generation charge currently before the City Council for approval. A range of mitigation fees are included in the study. A $70. 00 figure was used since it represents a mid-range level. Once the Council makes a decision regarding the per trip generation fee, the bond amount shall be adjusted to reflect the new fee. 67 x 17 .7/1000 sf = 1185.9 trips/day 51 x 17.7/1000 sf = 902 . 7 trips/day Total = 2088 . 6 trips/day 2, 088. 6 trips/day x $+70/trip = $±146, 202 10. That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff on a plan showing indoor recreation space with showers and lockers to serve the employees of the three buildings. 'Miti'gation Measures Rivertech Associates Page 3 11. That the applicant provide additional passive recreation areas, with seating and tables, on the western portion of the property to the satisfaction of the City's landscape planner. 12 . That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff in providing an easement across the far eastern and southern portions of the property to allow public access along the trail system which may potentially become a portion of the City's trail system. 13 . That in order to avoid visual and noise disturbance to the nearby Heron rookery, construction vehicles shall not be allowed to use Naches Avenue S.W. between January 23rd or whenever the Heron fledglings have left the nests. All construction vehicles shall enter and leave the site via Powell Avenue S.W. 14 . That the applicant use a system of oil/water separators, catch basins (with filtration screens) and French drains throughout the site, or other acceptable recharge methods, in order to maximize the hydrological recharging of the area's ground water table. NOTE: That the applicant provide a Schedule for the periodic cleaning and maintenance of the oil/water separator for approval by the Public Works Department. 15. That the applicant restore and preserve that portion of a 50 foot natural vegetation landscape buffer around the wetland identified as EO2/3 in Figure 3 of the City of Renton Wetland Study that is on their property. NOTE: This shall be done in a manner approved by the City of Renton and the Department of Ecology including measures to protect the wetland from human encroachment. Such measures do not necessarily necessitate the removal of existing fill materials. Measures selected will be based upon a careful review of the site and impacts on the wetland at issue by personnel from the City and DOE. mmdoc • .4461 iRENT'ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF.• -. 056 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to aallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67 , 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23 , 000 sq. ft. , ! respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: Aug. 17, 1988 SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 'Aug.24, 1988 ENGINEERING DIVISION; TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:Sept. 20, 1988 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ' • POLICE DEPARTMENT • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING. VISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 001P.M. ON AUGUST 12, 1988. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: nV NOI13 I Iv 0 D1UIS1 Q3 , APPROVED >< APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED ? JI5 D L.ps o5c-N91(vto P(Aro RO9uwo CCU To THE. 2EL0 c.pch ch..' cr Euo (o tJ O �.... hroo yI moo IF! IDN IKIRgo W1 k1oRT Tl-�1�. �UII�CJJh . T 1Z.c&1 -rtz..665 for G N P\-c(449 s. 3rfouso newc1p .\1151'Uvce cSikkrori TT TI-f P RQJ€c j' '(lit viuo-( TZ-cO matt- b USEo) , . L)co(o�S( pi(DDIJ(a .OM O QL51O� PC�Mo -1"P+13c.�5 INczaUi)O TI•r v, 506 t�►�, -t kU11A coiv\pLobt c N hcN 6S G6r)1 2. -� - DATE ... . SIGNATURE OF DI .CT'OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 ei l r � 'l I • • : 'NOtICE OF PUBLIC HEARING• '�;,;• ;' RENTON HEARING EXAMINER • RENTON,WASHINGTON •'`'` • i A PUBLIC•HEARING WILL BE HELD BY` AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION HIS RENTON HEARING INE THE CO N- HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN- CIL''CHAMBERS ON THE: S COND FLOOR OF CITY'HALL, RENTON, ASH- Acadrey BennerIFINGTON;'`•ON'•DECEMBER•6,'1988, AT'. ,being first duly sworn on oath states i;9:00 A.M.•TO CONSIDER,THE FOI,LOWI that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the IING PETITIONS,q;', • q:'1./'1.'.• RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES-NACRES 10ENTER(AMENDED) IrECF;SA;SM?056-86't s:, ',;; VALLEY DAILY NEWS +Applicatio`n''-.foi 5Ite:ilan approval to allow.` 3the..,deveIopment of 'three buildings; el.!• Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition «three-story,office building of 67,000 sq.it:,; end two one-story'•office/R &'D:building9 • Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers ?with 28,000 Sq.ft.and,23,000 sq.it.;respec,i are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six ?block�of NecThe hes A enue SW.edintther ti004 monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to,printed and published �'" � UNION SOUARE;ASSOCIATES""-' �`; in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King A ;p r' County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approvedppdcanf,duff Off of.theit to: ato aul_8,1 le as a legal �cu.yds. of,duff off of. site,to a suitable•: newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for disposal area;.bl relocate 30,600 cu.yds.,of, King County. • fill within t,the, gie"area; andc)'Impo�t' • `21,000 cu:yds. of4;§uitable;fill to'completa, ,the grading'of the',site. The property located on the north side oi,NE4th Streat,The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition „west of Duvall Avenue;NE trs'1`.et' Renton Edition x , Auburn Edition , (and not in 'o' Legal desotiptions;of-the,files noted . supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers e el pMenitepa the i. rton.f ommunity evelopment.Departrpent. !7 ;, ;;� i; ,;� ;,} r • during the below stated period.The annexed notice a "'ALL.INTERESTED:PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS•_'ARE'INVITED'TO'rbE'PRE, Notice of Public dearirg 'SENT'A1 tI E?PUBLIC'HEARING`ON was published on 1 0 A t3 R5 1 5 A DECEMBERi 6; f1988;`AT'9:00•'A.M,;,TO�• Fd o V e ntla e r a 7-� EXPRESS;THEIR bPINIONS:}} 1„!{ E ;; Oublishe QV J all l�4rh ` E1IIIBER,27,,.1988 Valley',• The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 30 .40 • • ,• Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 n d day of De c 19 88 Nota Public for the State of Washington, g , residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. -VON#87 Revised 11/86 of -R4, • 4 . 0 0. z INI COT I C E . , .. _ ...._ ..„ , . ,. o,9grSD SEPTE,„z, City of , Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING ., , in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON DECEMBER 6, 1988 BEGINNING AT 9 '°0A•M• P.M. ECF-056-88, SA-056-88, SM-056-88 CONCERFI'NG: . RIVERTECH(AMENDED) ASSOCIATES—NACHES CENTER APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF THREE BUILDINGS; A THREE—STORY OFFICE BUILDING OF 67, 000 SQ.FT. , AND TWO ONE—STORY OFFICE/R&D BUILDINGS WITH 28, 000_ SQ.FT. AND . 23, 000 SQ.FT. , RESPECTIVELY. [----------- ‘Ct, ,].., ..:' ../r fi:i.!.....1.4-- - P...-.0.. iih'?.:(4=:'/Allii.lf."--7Lij ckippil r t ,- S4 , ova ( • • I •171; 01 L.—___:_ :ir;"''"I'l f Nis rl:'6 7. 'Jr,./i iirfrietii, • s /�/ . ...N ...I/NI Ili ' ' �. ,. Ili' ` j gc - *. Vc°" igni I lAsvPr=,), - ,,/4:1.,.4.1-712- y . 7 , .1.. ,,....-:..2 ../ ,i;110roor . "-.... . 4. 4.4, A1.44.4p„.':',W# , • 4 'r ; I. '.....1 ..-........ - ,Orlz.',;•;difitet•2."41 :410PNIN, '- ' • , -, • r .F�'UD-03V•15:�' . . I �'`\ti 'o P ; ; I MP ° \ N , . I 1 4 II -- s GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE 600 BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE SW. • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON • BUILDING S. ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT ` PROPER AUTHORIZATION 0 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: December 1, 1988 TO: Fred Kaufman, ear Examin r FROM: Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Examiner RE: Supplemental Report Rivertech Associates/Rivertech Corporate Center File SA-056-88 This memo is to clarify information submitted in the "Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner" on the above referenced project. The first two paragraphs of Item No. 3 of the report briefly discuss the fill and grade permit issued on the site and the fact that the Department of Ecology issued a stop work order on the site. As discussed in the report, representatives of the City and Ecology met on the site to evaluate the extent of the property which would fall under the jurisdiction of the State Shorelines Act which included an evaluation of the wetlands on the site. The field study resulted in discussions with Ecology regarding development of the property. During the meeting several ideas on potential mitigation measures were discussed in relation to development occurring on the site. The discussion in the second paragraph of Item No. 3 ended abruptly without indicating the City's position which subsequently lead to the processing of the subject application. The remainder of this memo discusses the City's decision regarding the processing of applications on the Black River property. Based upon the meeting and in subsequent discussions with Ecology staff, a decision was made regarding the designations of the shorelines of the Black River property abutting the P-1 Forebay. The City's position since December 1983 , has been that on the portion of the property east of the confluence of the Black River and Springbrook Creek, the shoreline designation would be "urban environment" and the portion to the west of that line and on the north side of the P-1 Forebay would be, 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 - Fred Kaufman, Hearing :aminer Rivertech Supplement Report December 1, 1988 Page 2 "natural environment" . The Rivertech Associates site falls under the urban environment designation which allows "high- intensity land use" . The City's Shoreline Master Program defines the "urban environment" as an " . . .area of high- intensity land use including residential, commercial and industrial development. . . .On certain shorelines planned for future urban expansion, there should be limitations based on the physical aspects of the site" . (p.22, Shorelines Master Program) Further, since the City of Renton's Shoreline Program (as well as the State Shorelines Act) includes associated wetlands, a decision was made that the two wetlands on the site which were identified as being significant by the Department of Ecology were governed by the City's program. These wetlands are an emerging wetland labeled as E 02/3 and a scrub/shrub wetland labeled as S4 as identified in figure 3 of the City of Renton Wetlands Study prepared by Gene Williams and Douglas Canning. As noted under Item No. 3 of the Preliminary Report to the Examiner, the Black River Riparian Forest wetland was ranked as the most important wetland to preserve and/or acquire because of its former unique wetland habitat. The 1981 wetland study has not, however, been adopted by the City as official City policy. Further, conditions of the various wetlands identified in the study may have changed or new wetlands may have emerged due to development. Thus, this document is referenced as a source of information to incorporate into the decision making process governing properties with wetlands. In addition to the protection of the two (2) above identified wetlands, the Riparian grove, the existing greenbelt easements and the buffer created around the heron rookery, it was determined that the remainder of the site might be developed but would require additional measures to protect and enhance these areas and the overall hydrology of the site. Such measures included setbacks of fifty (50) feet around the wetlands; measures to minimize human intrusion into the natural area and around the heron rookery, including a possible "moat" separating structures and human activity from the Riparian grove and the greenbelt easement area adjacent to the forebay; the incorporation of biofiltration measures into the storm drainage system for the entire property; and measures to minimize the amount of impervious surfaces and fill on the site. Based upon the City's position with respect to the shoreline designations and policies governing development of the property to the north of the forebay, it was determined that an application could be accepted for this portion of the site. Since this area is designated under the City's - Fred Kaufman, Hearing :aminer Rivertech Supplement Report December 1, 1988 Page 3 Shoreline Master Program as an "urban environment" and due to the fact that the proposed project complies with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Shoreline Program policies, and the fact that the site is located on the west side of the Naches Avenue S.W. (extended) , more than 1, 000 feet away from the forebay staff believe the site is developable as proposed. In evaluating the project, staff and the Environmental Review Committee carefully reviewed the environmental impacts of the project on the surrounding properties and environment. One concern was to protect one of the two wetlands mentioned above, an emerging wetland known as E02/3 located immediately north of the filled portion of the subject property along the north property line. The applicant revised their drawings to reflect a fifty (50) foot buffer around this wetland as suggested by D.O.E. This resulted in shifting a portion of the parking lot near the wetland to the south and eliminating any impervious surfaces from the buffer area. In addition, the applicant agreed to amend the application to incorporate many of the mitigation measures of the Determination of Non-Significance issued for the project. The application, as revised, includes measures which: protect and enhance the wetland to the north; reduce the amount of the surface parking by both eliminating the number of stalls and by placing other stalls into parking reserve; limit the quantities of fill to be placed on the site; revise the landscaping plan to incorporate plant species which are a source of food for birds and small animals; provide a bond to ensure that a treed buffer is provided within the greenbelt easement along the west side of the old Black River Channel which will eventually screen the project from the heron rookery; further increase the public's access to the shoreline areas adjacent to the property; and minimize adverse impacts on the hydrology of the surrounding area in order to protect the wetlands of the Black River site and the forebay. Thus, the project, as modified by the applicant, has now been determined by staff to be generally in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan policies, Shoreline policies and regulations, and Zoning regulations governing development on the Rivertech Associates site. If you have any questions concerning the above, please call me at 2550. w.l NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON DECEMBER 6, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES-NACHES CENTER (AMENDED) ECF; SA; SM-056-88 Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three buildings; a three-story office building of 67, 000 sq. ft. , and two one-story office/R & D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft. and 23, 000 sq. ft. , respectively. The property is located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue SW. UNION SQUARE ASSOCIATES ECF; SP-041-88 Applicant seeks permit to: a) haul 8,100 cu.yds. of duff off of the site to a suitable disposal area; b) relocate 30,000 cu.yds. of fill within the site area; and c) import 21,000 cu.yds. of suitable fill to complete the grading of the site. The property is located on the north side of NE 4th Street, west of Duvall Avenue NE. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 6, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: NOVEMBER 25, 1988 rArchitecture and Planning Liii El Leason Pomeroy Northwest, Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 23 November 1988 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OFRENTON Mr. Jerry Lind 1 , NOV 2 8 1988 0 Planning Department � � � O U City of Renton .. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: RIVERTECH CENTER (NACHES CENTER) (ECF;SA;SM-056-88) Dear Jerry: Enclosed per our telephone conversation are 3 revised site plans, 3 revised landscape plans reflecting the increased setback from the E02-E03 wetland area to the north and parking reserve areas. Please note Buiding 1 and 2 have changed slightly in size and the total development area has reduced. We were able to move the 3-story office building 1 off the south swale area and provide emergency access around the building and keep it on the old pad area for the ADMAC building. Reduction PMT's of each have also been included for your use. Please call if you have any questions or need any further information. Res ctfully, r Roye�A. eg Pre ident RAB:db cc: David Schuman . l • NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION enton,Washington The Environmental al Review Committee (ERC) has re-issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following Audrey Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath states project under the authority of th6 Renton Municipal Code: that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the RIVERTECH ASSOCIATED—NACHES CENTER Application for site plan approval to VALLEY DAILY NEWS allow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings; a 3 story • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition offica huilding of 67,000 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/ R & D buildings with 28,000 Dailysqnewspapers six (6) times a week.That said newspapers Pr aft ans 2cated3,000 insq ft.,e respectively. publishedProperty is located in the 600 block of are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Naches Avenue S.W. ECF-056-88, SM- months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published 0556i8rtfter information regarding this action in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King is available in the Community Development County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Department, Municipal Building, Renton, newspaper order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for WasNAL. There, is a 1 days appeE Depe by P g is FINAL. is a 14 day period King County. which will end at 5:00 p.m. on October 17, 1988. Any appeal of this decision may be The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition made to the City's Hearing Examiner, , Renton Edition g , Auburn Edition , (and not in Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Renton,arly, Washington.whyA theaepDetl must state PP g Y clearly, in writing, Determination during the below stated period.The annexed notice a should be revised and must be accompa- nied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. Public . Notice Published in the Valley Daily News Octo- ber 3, 1988.R3172.Account#51067. was published on October 3, 1988 R3172 • — The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 25 .6° Subscribed and sworn to before m day of Oct 1968 Not Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11'86 41, 0 CITY OF RENTON s DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION November 22, 1988 Mr. David Schuman The Schuman Company Bldg. 3, Suite 219 16300 Christianson Road Seattle, WA 98188 RE: Rivertech Associates-Naches Center (Amended) ECF; SA; SM-056-88 Dear Mr. Schuman: A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 6, 1988. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. , v Dona . K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp (List of Copies to Parties of Record on Page 2) 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 v " Mr. David Schuman Rivertech Associates-Naches Cente (Amended) November 22, 1988 Page 2 cc: Mr. Robert Sieh Edwards & Barbieri Attorneys At Law 6501 Columbia Center 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Mary M. Anderson 13618 SE 180th Renton, WA 98058 Muckleshoot Tribal Council c/o Morgan Bradley 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98002 MEMORANDUM To fL4 Date From M/ LINO Subject Rtvi.a•ft414, Itma SA On • V CM,LEa sfiteurootiPry hum iw 0,1 Nib Pttotatio , OU *Pict WITH 5 T ISeo .1•I,�,��LM .12016414s * Tot ‘01,0133cApinge plekka P0)0 e PRE iris. dig tes Ss7C Puns, Poo roots), %WO o O uciiotV c� tPrcii `b t,Pv)%vu(p CITY OF RENTON .JI. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION November 10, 1988 Mr. David Schuman The Schuman Company Bldg. 3 , Suite 219 16300 Christianson Road Seattle, Washington 98188 RE: Zoning on Rivertech Associates Site Naches Center (Ref.File SA-056-88) Dear Mr. Schuman: Per your request in a phone conversation this morning, I reviewed the zoning for the property being developed by Rivertech Associates. The City's Zoning map designates the site as O-P, Office Park. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Y \. N-.- Jeanette M. Samek-McKague Senior Planner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 4i CITY OF RENTON NLL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION November 10, 1988 Mr. David Schuman The Schuman Company Bldg. 3, Suite 219 16300 Christianson Road Seattle, Washington 98188 RE: Zoning on Rivertech Associates Site Naches Center (Ref.File SA-056-88) Dear Mr. Schuman: Per your request in a phone conversation this morning, I reviewed the zoning for the property being developed by Rivertech Associates. The City's Zoning map designates the site as O-P, Office Park. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Jeanette M. Samek-McKague Senior Planner • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WA 98055 206-235-2501 FAX# 235-2513 DATE PAGES (EXCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET) ATTENTION: DAV I D �CI�cM FROM: IL---4-Aj ✓)/L� (A-6z- C17- y D 1:- 06-R1-roAl A' )a ENVIRONMENTALECLARATION .0 APPLICATION NO. ECF-056-88 , SA-056-88, SM-056-88 APPLICANT RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES - NACHES CENTER (AMENDED) PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF THREE BUILDINGS; A 3 STORY OFFICE BUILDING OF 67, 000 SQ.FT. , AND 2 ONE-STORY OFFICE/R&D BUILDINGS WITH 28, 000 SQ.FT. AND 23, 000 SQ.FT. , RESPECTIVELY. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE 600 BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE SW. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES I><1 DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT I I WILL 111 WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., NOVEMBER 21, 1988 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. .\ Public Notice NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMI\JATION AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Environmental Review Corn nittee Renton,Washington The Environmental Review Committee Audrey Benner (ERC), upon a remand from the Renton ,being first duly sworn on oath states Hearing Examiner, has revised the condi that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the tions of the Determination of Non-Signifi- cance-Mitigated previously issued for the following project: RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES-NACHES VALLEY DAILY NEWS CENTER ECF-056-88,SA-056-88,SM-056-88 • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three buildings; a 3 Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers story office building of 67,000 sq.ft., and 2 are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six one-storyt. noffice/R&D ftb., respengs ctively. The gsq.ft. and 23,000 sq.ft., respectively. The months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published p,operty is located in the 600 block of Niches Avenue SW. in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Further information regarding this actior County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal is available in the Community Development newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determinatior King County. is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal perioc which will end at 5:00 p.m. on November The notice in the exact form attached,waspublished in the Kent Edition 21, 1988. Any appeal of this decision ma) bee made to the City's HearinggExaminer , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South at€ supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Renton,rly, Washington.why A theaepDetl Detemust rmination g Y clearly, in writing, Determination during the below stated period.The annexed notice a should be revised and must be accompa nied by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee. Nu-tice of Envir-on-mental Determination Published:November 7, 1988 Valley Daily News R5138 Account#51067 was published on November 7, 1988 B511R The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 2 5 .6 0 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14 th day of Nov 198_8_ I Nota ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN N87 Revised 11/86 • 4•• CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION November 4, 1988 Mr. David Schuman The Schuman Company Bldg. 3, Suite 219 16300 Christianson Road Seattle, WA 98188 Re: . Rivertech Associates - Naches Center Amended Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated ECF;SA;SM-056-88 (AAD-105-88) Dear Mr. Schuman: This letter is to inform you that, upon remand from the Renton Hearing Examiner, the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the mitigated conditions of the above referenced project. The Committee on November 2, 1988 issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following revised conditions: 1. That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner to ensure that, to the greatest extent possible, as many of the significant trees on the site are retained as • specified in the FE1S for the Blackriver rezone application. NOTE: Per the FEIS, a minimum of 20% of the site is required to be landscaped with continuous natural landscape materials and large trees may need to be placed in tree wells to protect them. 2. That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner on revising the landscaping plan to include plants species which will provide sources of food for birds and small animals per the recommendations in the FEIS for Blackriver. 3. That the applicant limit fill material to building pads and landings and that the applicant place only clean fill within these portions of the site. Said filling shall not exceed the 100 year floodplain level, plus one (1) foot. This material shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to it's disposition on site. NOTE: Minor grading of parking areas will be allowed sufficient to allow this use. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 = .• - ' David Schuman Rivertech Associates - N :s Center Revised Mitigated Conditions November 3, 1988 Page 2 4. That the applicant work with the Police Department and the Public Works Department on appropriate haul routes through the City. Trucks will not be allowed to use the roadway (proposed Naches Avenue right-of-way) through the Black River site north of the Forebay area between January 23rd or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left the nests. 5. That the applicant limit the operation of construction equipment to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday per the Blackriver FEIS and that no construction activity shall be allowed within a 1,200 foot radius of the .Heron rookery (to the west of the site) between January 23rd, or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left their nests unless full visual screening, approved by the City, is provided to block construction activity, including glare from welding activity or unshielded light sources having an intensity greater than 100 watts. 6. That the applicant shall provide bonding, funding or other security acceptable to the City Attorney sufficient to ensure the planting of a treed buffer within the greenbelt easement to the west along the edge of the old Black River Channel, which will, at maturity, visually screen the Heron rookery from the subject site. NOTE: The applicant or his landscape architect should meet with the City's ' landscape planner to develop a plan acceptable to the City from which cost estimates for this improvement can be derived. • • 7. That the applicant shall work with Metro to develop a TSM program and shall submit a copy to the City prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy permit. 8. That the applicant shall reduce the number of proposed (547 stalls).parking stalls by 70 stalls by eliminating 45 of the parking stalls and placing 25 stalls into a landscaped reserve per Section 4-2208(12). NOTE: The reduction of parking stalls is based upon an 85% efficiency, a standard for industrial developments of this type. To the greatest extent possible the majority of the parking stalls shall be eliminated in the eastern portion of the site near the recreation area. The applicant shall work with the landscape planner on the location of the specific stalls to be eliminated. 9. That the applicant provide the City with a bond or other means acceptable to the City Attorney for their fair share of traffic improvement costs for the Grady Way Benefit area in the amount of approximately $146,202.00 which shall be paid prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. ' . David Schuman Rivertech Associates - N s Center Revised Mitigated Conditions November 3, 1988 Page 3 NOTE: The above figure shall be adjusted to reflect a new trip generation charge currently before the City Council for approval. A range of mitigation fees are included in the study. A $70.00 figure was used since it represents a mid-range level. Once the Council makes a decision regarding the per trip generation fee, the bond amount shall be adjusted to reflect the new fee. 67 x 17.7/1000 sf = 1185.9 trips/day 51 x 17.7/1000 sf = 902.7 trips/day Total = 2088.6 trips/day 2,088.6 trips/day x $±70/trip = $±146,202 10. That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff on a plan showing indoor recreation space with showers and lockers to serve the employees of the three buildings. 11. That the applicant provide additional passive recreation areas, with seating and tables, on the western portion of the property to the satisfaction of the City's landscape planner. 12. That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff in providing an easement across the far eastern and southern portions of the property to allow public access along the trail system which may potentially become a portion of the City's trail system. • 13. That in order to avoid visual and noise disturbance to the nearby Heron rookery, construction vehicles shall not be allowed to use Naches Avenue S.W. between January 23rd or whenever the Heron fledglings have left the nests. All construction vehicles shall enter and leave the site via Powell Avenue S.W. 14. That the applicant use a system of oil/water separators, catch basins (with filtration screens) and French drains throughout the site, or other acceptable recharge methods, in order to maximize the hydrological recharging of the area's ground water table. NOTE: That the applicant provide a schedule for the periodic cleaning and maintenance of the oil/water separator for approval by the Public Works Department. 15. That the applicant restore and preserve that portion of a 50 foot natural vegetation landscape buffer around the wetland identified as EO2/3 in Figure 3 of the City of Renton Wetland Study that is on their property. NOTE: This shall be done in a manner approved by the City of Renton and the Department of Ecology including measures to protect the wetland from human encroachment. Such measures do not necessarily necessitate the removal of existing fill materials. Measures selected will be based upon a careful review of the site and impacts on the wetland at issue by personnel from the City and DOE. David Schuman Rivertech Associates - N; s Center Revised Mitigated Conditions November 3, 1988 Page 4 A Threshold Determination was issued for this project on August 17, 1988. Comments were received during a 15 day comment period which ended on September 6, 1988. A DNS with revised mitigation measures was issued on November 2, 1988 with a required 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM on November 21, 1988. This Determination is FINAL. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non- refundable $75.00 filing fee. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235- 2550 and ask for Jeanette Samek-McKague or me. For the Environmental Review Committee, Sinc rely, • Dona K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator • DKE:mjp (Copies sent to Parties of Record on next page) cc: Mr. Robert Sieh Muckleshoot Tribal Council Edwards & Barbieri c/o Morgan Bradley Attorneys at Law 39015 172nd Avenue SE 6501 Columbia Center Auburn, WA 98002 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Mary M. Anderson 13618 SE 180th Renton, WA 98058 4i 0 CITY OF RENTON N LL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION November 3, 1988 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations issued on November 2, 1988: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES - NACHES CENTER (AMENDED) ECF-056-88, SA-056-88, SM-056-88 Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three buildings; a 3 story office building of 67,000 sq. ft., and 2 one-story office/R&D buildings with 28,000 sq.ft. and 23,000 sq.ft., respectively. The property is located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue SW. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), upon a remand from the Renton Hearing Examiner, has revised the conditions of the Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated previously issued for the above project. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM on November 21, 1988. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington, 98055. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non- refundable $75.00 filing fee. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 4 _ BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING December 6, 1988 APPLICANT: Rivertech Associates FILE NUMBER: SA-056-88, SM-056-88, ECF-056-88 LOCATION: East of Naches Avenue S.W. and north of S.W. 7th at the termination of Powell Avenue S.W. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval to allow the development of the development of a three building complex; a three-story office building and two one-story office and research and development buildings with a total of 118, 000 square feet. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Rivertech Associates 2 . Applicant: Rivertech Associates 3 . Existing Zoning: O-P, Office Park 4 . Existing Zoning in the Area: R-2, Residential-Two Family; and M-P, Manufacturing Park 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option-Office 6. Size of Property: ± 10 Acres 7. Access: SW 7th St. to proposed Naches Ave. 8 . Land Use: Undeveloped 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Undeveloped Property East: Undeveloped Property South: Manufacturing/Office Uses West: Undeveloped Property C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation 1745 April 14, 1959 *Corrected 1756 May 19, 1959 *Corrected 1928 December 12, 1961 Rezone (G to ) R-432-79 Rezone (G to M-P) R-129-80 3694 December 24, 1982 Lot Line Adjustment LLA-013-84 September 23, 1983 Preliminary Plat PP-098-84 December 4, 1984 Special Permit SP-090-84 December 4, 1984 Variance V-091-84 December 4, 1984 Special Permit SP-024-86 May 20, 1986 Site Approval SA-057-86 August 13 , 1986 Variance V-058-86 Denied Admin. Appeal AAD-105-88 • Withdrawn BUILDING AND ZONING PyDARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT T; FE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING - Rivech Associates December 6, 1988 • Page 2 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: A 12-inch water line is located along SW 7th St. and along the proposed Naches Ave. SW b. Sewer: A 12-inch sanitary sewer line is located along SW 7th St. and along the proposed Naches Ave. SW c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water flows into the Black River drainage system. 2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit: Metro transit routes No. 199 and No. 340 operate along SW 7th St. to Lind Ave. SW approximately 0.4 of a mile southeast of the subject property. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: N/A b. Middle Schools: N/A c. High Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: N/A E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-730, Manufacturing (M-P) 2 . Section 4-722 (G) , Variance. 3 . Section 4-734 (F) (2) , Landscaping Requirement - Green River 4. Section 4-738, Site Plan Review. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Industrial Goal and Objectives, City of Renton, Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, pgs. 18-19. 2 . Green River Valley Policy Plan, City of Renton, Comprehensive Plan. Compendium, March 1986, pgs. 31-50. , G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Rivertech Associates, seeks site plan approval of an office/research and development complex known as the Rivertech Corporate Center. The complex consists of a three- story office building of 67, 000 square feet, a one-story office/research and development complex consisting of 28, 000 square feet and a one-story office and development building consisting of 23, 000 square feet. The three story office building will be a steel framed structure using a combination of brick and concrete together with tinted and relective glass accents at the access points to the building. The two one-story office/R&D buildings will be concrete tilt-up structures with tinted glass. Reflective glass, columns and raised parapets will define the access points to the buildings. BUILDING AND ZONING ^T'nARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT T 'HE HEARING EXAMINER , PUBLIC HEARING - Rivt� Lech Associates ' December 6, 1988 Page 3 The complex is designed in a manner which preserves a number of of the existing trees on the site as well as a swale, along the south property line, into the landscaping plan. A jogging trail is shown in the site plans along the south property line. The project design includes courtyards connecting Buildings 2 and 3 which have landscaping, seating areas, and bike racks. Finally, the complex is designed in an area in the eastern portion of the site which incorporates existing native vegetation to create a wildlife habitat area and recreational area. The applicant proposes placing picnic tables and a horseshoe court within this area. The applicant, on November 28, 1988, submitted a revised plan which shows the three building complex but deviates from the original square footage of Buildings 1 and 2. Building 1 is proposed to be 73, 132 square feet instead of 67, 000 square feet and Building 2 is proposed to be 17,705 instead of 28,000 square . feet. The new proposal actually reduces the total square , footage of the buildings from 118, 000 square feet to 113,837 square feet. This report addresses the site design as shown on plans dated September 19, 1988. The. comments appear to be applicable to the new revised plans dated November 28, 1988. However, until staff have more opportunity to review the revisions, this report will not address the plan. 2 . As noted in the history, there have been some major land use actions involving the Rivertech Associates site. A brief discussion of two of the applicantions, a Special Permit for grade and fill and the Site Plan Review application for the ADMAC building proposed on the subject property provides the basis for the decisions on this application. Underlying these permits was a rezone approved on the property for which an Environmental Impact Statement was prepared known as the Black River Office Park EIS. 3 . The Rivertech site until recently has been under the ownership of First City Equities who planned (and still plan) to develop an Office Park complex known as the Black River Corporate Park on property located north of the site and to the west of of Naches Avenue. First City Equities had been developing plans for the office park and in 1986 had a fill and grade permit approved on the property north and east of the P-1 Forebay. Work commenced on the site based on the approved permit. However, while the fill and grade activity was being conducted, the City determined that a Shorelines permit had not been applied for and contacted the developer to do so. On March 9, 1987, the State Department of Ecology issued a stopwork order over the site. City staff and representatives (in particular Mary Burg and Terra Prodan ) of the Department of Ecology conducted field studies of the site to evaluate the extent to which the State Shorelines Act would apply to it. The field work included checking the information on wetlands on the site identified in the 1981 study by the City of Renton known as the Wetlands Study. This study had identified the Black river Riparian Forest as the most important wetland to preserve in the City. Following the field studies and reviews of information regarding past development activity and City actions, representatives of the City and the Department of Ecology met in November of 1987, to discuss the status of the stop work/administrative orders on the Black River 'Corporate Park property as well as those portions of the City's Shoreline Master Program which affected development on this site. At that meeting, the representatives of D.O.E. made recommendations and discussed how development might be allowed on the site and suggested mitigation measures that the City might consider incorporating into the Shoreline Master Program. The City then sent correspondence to D.O.E memorializing the understanding of the information discussed at BUILDING AND ZONING ' "?ARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT T ?HE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING - Rivech Associates December 6, 1988 Page 4 the meeting. In December 1987, correspondence was received from D.O.E. stating that the exchanged correspondence did not "constitute a "set-in-concrete" agreement. " The agency's position is that the exchanged correspondence was "merely our initial thought on what might constitue a workable scenario for redesignation and ultimate development of the property. " In 1986,. First City Equities, the former property owner, applied for a site plan for a two-story office buildings with 93, 170 square feet on 4. 3 acres of the existing site adjacent to the c of Naches Avenue S.W. The project was known as the Admac Building and was approved on the site with conditions regarding the c of Naches Avenue S.W. These conditions included establishing the width and length of the roadway extension was reserved; that the applicant agree to participate in the area wide traffic improvements; and that completion of the access roadway would be subject to the approval of the Fire Department. A Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated was issued for the project with the condition that the applicant dedicate and construct Naches Avenue S.W. from S.W. 7th Street to the temporary cul-de-sac serving the ADMac site. Following approval of the site plan, the applicant never constructed the building. 4 . The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated on October 3, 1988, which was later revised. The revised Determination was issued on November 7, 1988 which was appealed by the applicant. Before the Hearing Examiner heard the appeal, the applicant withdrew the appeal due to the fact that the issues were resolved. The following are the revised mitigation measures issued for the project: a. That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner to ensure that, to the greatest extent possible, as many of the significant trees on the site are retained as specified in the FEIS for the Blackriver rezone application. NOTE: Per the FEIS, a minimum of 20% of the site is • required to be landscaped with continuous natural landscape materials and large trees may need to be placed in tree wells to protect them. • b. That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner on revising the landscaping plan to include plants species which will provide sources of food for birds and small animals per the recommendations in the FEIS for Blackriver. c. That the applicant limit fill material to building pads and landings and that the applicant place only clean fill within these portions of the site. Said filling shall not exceed the 100 year floodplain level, plus one (1) foot. This material shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to it's disposition on site. NOTE: Minor grading of parking areas will be allowed sufficient to allow this use. d. That the applicant work with the Police Department and the Public Works Department on appropriate haul routes through the City. Trucks will not be allowed to use the roadway (proposed Naches Avenue right-of-way) through the Black River site north of the Forebay area between January 23rd or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left the nests. e. That the applicant limit the operation of construction equipment to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 7: 00 p.m. , Monday through Friday per the Blackriver FEIS and that no construction activity shall be allowed within a 1,200 foot radius of the Heron rookery (to the west of the site) between January 23rd, or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left their nests unless full visual screening, approved BUILDING AND ZONING '"ARTMENT • PRELIMINARY REPORT T SHE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING - Rivertech Associates December 6, 1988 Page 5 by the City, is provided to block construction activity, including glare from welding activity or unshielded light sources having an intensity greater than 100 watts. f. That the applicant shall provide bonding, funding or other security acceptable to the City Attorney sufficient to ensure the planting of a treed buffer within the greenbelt easement to the west along the edge of the old Black River Channel, which will, at maturity, visually screen the Heron rookery from the subject site. NOTE: The applicant or his landscape architect should meet with the City's landscape planner to develop a plan acceptable to the City from which cost estimates for this improvement can be derived. g. That the applicant shall work with Metro to develop a TSM program and shall submit a copy to the City prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy permit. h. That the applicant shall reduce the number of proposed (547 stalls) parking •stalls by 70 stalls by eliminating 45 of, the parking stalls and placing 25 stalls into a landscaped reserve per Section 4-2208 (12) . NOTE: The reduction of parking stalls is based upon an 85% efficiency, a standard for industrial developments of this type. To the greatest extent possible the majority of the parking stalls shall be eliminated in the eastern portion of the site near the recreation area. The applicant shall work with the landscape planner on the location of the specific stalls to be eliminated. i. That the applicant provide the City with a bond or other means acceptable to the City Attorney for their fair share of traffic improvement costs for the Grady Way Benefit area in the amount of approximately $146,202 . 00 which shall. be paid prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. NOTE: The above figure shall be adjusted to reflect a new trip generation charge currently .before' the City Council for approval. A range of mitigation fees are included in the study. A $70.00 figure was used since it represents a mid- range level. Once the Council makes a decision regarding the per trip generation fee, the bond amount shall be adjusted to reflect the new fee. 67 x 17.7/1000 sf = 1185.9 trips/day 51 x 17.7/1000 sf = 902 .7 trips/day Total = 2088. 6 trips/day 2, 088. 6 trips/day x $±70/trip = $+146,202 j . That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff on a plan showing indoor recreation space with showers and lockers to serve the employees of the three buildings. k. That the applicant provide additional passive recreation areas, with seating and tables, on the western portion' of the property to the satisfaction of the City's landscape planner. 1. That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff in providing an easement across the far eastern and southern portions of the property to allow public access along the trail system which may potentially become a portion of the City's trail system. bUlLLLNCi ANL GUN1NU Ur;YAKTMhNT PRELIMINARY REPORT T SHE HEARING EXAMINER ' PUBLIC HEARING - Riv .ech Associates December 6, 1988 Page 6 m. That in order to avoid visual and noise disturbance to the nearby Heron rookery, construction vehicles shall not be allowed to use Naches Avenue S.W. between January 23rd or whenever the Heron fledglings have left the nests. All construction vehicles shall enter and leave the site via Powell Avenue S.W. n. That the applicant use a system of oil/water separators, catch basins (with filtration screens) and French drains throughout the site, or other acceptable recharge methods, in order to maximize the hydrological recharging of the area's ground water table. NOTE: That the applicant provide a schedule for the periodic cleaning and maintenance of the oil/water separator for approval by the Public Works Department. o. That the applicant restore and preserve that portion. of a 50 foot natural vegetation landscape buffer around the wetland identified as EO2/3 in Figure 3 of the City of Renton Wetland Study that is on their property. NOTE: This shall be done in a manner approved by the City of Renton and the Department of Ecology including measures to protect the wetland from human encroachment. Such measures do not necessarily necessitate the removal of existing fill materials. Measures selected will be based upon a careful review of the site and impacts on the wetland at issue by personnel from the City and DOE. 5. The applicant has applied for site plan approval in compliance with Section 4-738 of the Zoning Code on Site Plan Review. Section 4-738 (D) (1) , lists ten criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on site plan approval applicantions. These criteria are as follows: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option-Office. This is an area " . . . intended for a broad range of choice in industrial, service commercial and office uses. . .located in a park-like setting of high operational and environmental standards. " Further, the Land Use Element Map shows a suffix identifying that there may be special site characteristics which the types of allowable uses are defined. The Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option areas are characterized by adequate setbacks, landscaping , design standards, wildlife habitat and open space, and minimum impacts from noise, glare, traffic, air and water pollution, and safety hazards. In this case, the suffix shows office uses as the preferred development at the subject site. This is due in large part to the natural features of the site and surrounding properties. Further, the Valley Plan which identifies the site as being suitable for office use and discourages large scale warehousing and industrial uses. The emphasis is on " . . .office and other similar service and light industrial activities in low rise building structures should be encouraged. These small to medium scale office and business park uses should be harmonious with their setting and should take advantage of the amenities offered by the forebay pond and Black River Forest. " (See page 48 of the Comprehensive Plan Compendium) . The proposed site plan also complies with other policies in the Valley Area Plan with respect to land development, urban design and recreation. BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT T ME HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING - Riv__ .ech Associates December 6, 1988 Page 7 The applicant's proposal is consistent with various policies of the and the Comprehensive Plan Map designation of Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option-Office. b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The subject site is designated as Office Park on the Zoning Map. The project, as modified, complies with the requirements of Section 4-718 of Office Park zoned property. The proposed buildings meet the development standards of the Office Park zoning code section. c. Mitigation of impact to surrounding properties and uses; The suject project, as modified, will be a "good neighbor" in that to the greatest extent possible there should not be any adverse impacts. The environmental Determination issued for the project includes conditions which to minimize impacts to the nearby heron rookery. BUILDING AND ZONING 'ARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT T 11E HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING - Rive tech Associates _ December 6, 1988 Page 8 during the construction period; reduces impacts to the wetland to the north of the project site; that reduces the hours and hence hours during which noise is generated and adverse impacts as a result of storm water runoff from development of the site. In addition, the applicant has proposed a design which is compatible with the architecture of similar developments adjacent to and in the vicinity of the project site. Landscaped setback areas are located around the periphery of the site. d. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The applicant has designed the project in a manner which reduces attempts to save as many of the large trees on the site; follows the contours of the site; retains the drainage swale and landscaping area along the south property line; and provides a fifty (50) setback along the north portion of the property. In addition, the applicant has provided decorative entry plazas and provides large landscaped areas around the buildings. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The subject proposal is not anticipated to adversely impact surrounding property values and, in fact, should enhance them. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The applicant has generally provided safe and efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation. The parking lot layout provides good circulation around the site. In fact, there was some question raised by the September 19, 1988, site plan as to whether adequate fire protection. could be provided along the south side of Building 1. The new plan (November 28, 1988) actually provides complete circulation around Building 1. The location of Building 1 was originally proposed when the project was originally submitted in July of this year. With respect to pedestrian circulation, the applicant can improve circulation by providing linkages through the parking lot between Buildings 1 and 2 and between the three buildings and the trail and natural area located adjacent to the south property line and the easternmost portion of the site. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposed site plan shows sufficient setbacks between , the buildings in order to provide adequate light and air,. for the complex. , h. Mitigation of noise, odors, and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The project, as mitigated, should have minimal impacts with respect generating noise and odors or other harmful conditions such as pollution resulting from the urban runoff. During the construction activity additional noise will be generated and the overall noise level will increase during this period of time. BUILDING AND ZONING ARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT T !HE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING - Riv=4,:ech Associates December 6, 1988 Page 9 i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Development of the proposed project will not create a burden on public services and facilities. The site is adequately served by water and sewer j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The subject proposal, due to the layout of the site, the landscaped areas and the building design, should enhance surrounding property values and continue the trend toward developing the vacant property in the area. 6. Various City Departments have reviewed and commented on the project. These comments are attached to the end of this report. 7 . The site plan application, as modified, is in the public interest and will not be a burden on public services. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner approve the site plan application for Rivertech Associates subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant comply with the mitigation measures of. the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated issued for the project. 2 . That the applicant work with the City's Planning Division staff to improve pedestrian circulation by providing linkages through the parking lot between Buildings 1 and 2 and between the three buildings and the trail and natural area located adjacent to the south property line and the easternmost portion of the site. • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (REVISED MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-056-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SM-056-88 PROPONENT: RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three build- ings; a 3 story office building of 67, 000 sq. ft. , and one-story office/ R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft. and 23, 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue SW. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c•) . Upon a remand from the Renton Hearing Examiner, revised conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee on November 2 , 1988, under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . A Threshold Determination was issued on August 17, 1988. Comments were received during a fifteen (15) day comment period which ended on September 6, 1988 . A DNS with modified mitigation measures and new conditions were adopted by the Environmental Review Committee. There was a 14 day appeal period which ended October 17, 1988 during which time the proponent submitted an appeal. A Hearing Examiner public hearing was scheduled for November 1, 1988 at which time the project was remanded to the Environmental Review Committee to revise the conditions of the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated previously issued. On November 2, 1988 the Environmental Review Committee revised the conditions and issued an amended Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated with a 14 day appeal period. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: November 7 , 1988 DATE OF DECISION: November 2, 1988 SIGNATURES: Ronald G. Nelson Iuarry 'Sprin r Building of icia , Planning Ma ger �1Ce yber-.� sting P LIe-Works-D DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (RECONSIDERATION) MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Rivertech Associates ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-056-88 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-056-88, SM-056-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three building: a 3 story office building of 67,000 sq. ft. , and 2 one-story office/R&D buildings with 28 , 000 sq. ft. and 23 ,000. sq. ft. . respectively. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue S.W. DETERMINATION: Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner to ensure that, to the greatest extent possible, as many of the significant trees on the site are retained as specified in the FEIS for the Blackriver rezone application. NOTE: Per the FEIS, a minimum of 20% of the site is required to be landscaped with continuous natural landscape materials and large trees may need to be placed in tree wells to protect them. 2 . That the applicant work with the City' s Landscape Planner on revising the landscaping plan to include plants species which will provide sources of food for birds and small animals per the recommendations in the FEIS for Blackriver. 3 . That the applicant limit fill material to building pads and landings and that the applicant place only clean fill within these portions of the site. Said filling shall not exceed the 100 year floodplain level, plus one (1) foot. This material shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to it's disposition on site. NOTE: Minor grading of parking areas will be allowed sufficient to allow this use. 4. That the applicant work with the Police Department and the Public Works Department on appropriate haul routes through the City. Trucks will not be allowed to use the roadway (proposed Naches Avenue right-of-way) through the Black River site north of the Forebay area between January 23rd or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left the nests. i>. 4.. - Mitigation Measures Rivertech Associates Page 2 5. That the applicant limit the operation of construction equipment to the hours between 7 :00 a.m. and 7 : 00 p.m. , Monday through Friday per the Blackriver FEIS and that no construction activity shall be allowed within a 1, 200 foot radius of the Heron rookery (to the west of the site) between January 23rd, or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left their nests unless full visual screening, approved by the City, is provided to block construction activity, including glare from welding activity or unshielded light sources having an intensity greater than 100 watts. 6. That the applicant shall provide bonding, funding or other security acceptable to the City Attorney sufficient to ensure the planting of a treed buffer within the greenbelt easement to the west along the edge of the old Black River Channel, which will, at maturity, visually screen the Heron rookery from the subject site. NOTE: The applicant or his landscape architect should meet with the City' s landscape planner to develop a plan acceptable to the City from which cost estimates for this improvement can be derived. 7 . That the applicant shall work with Metro to develop a TSM program and shall submit a copy to the City prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy permit. 8 . That the applicant shall reduce the number of proposed (547 stalls) parking stalls by 70 stalls by eliminating 45 of the parking stalls and placing 25 stalls into a landscaped reserve per Section 4-2208 (12) . NOTE: The reduction of parking stalls is based upon an 85% efficiency, a standard for industrial developments of this type. To the greatest extent possible the majority of the parking stalls shall be eliminated in the eastern portion of the site near the recreation area. The applicant shall work with the landscape planner on the location of the specific stalls to be eliminated. 9 . That the applicant provide the City with a bond or other means acceptable to the City Attorney for their fair share of traffic improvement costs for the Grady Way Benefit area in the amount of approximately $146, 202 . 00 which shall be paid prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. NOTE: The above figure shall be adjusted to reflect a new trip generation charge currently before the City Council for approval. A range of mitigation fees are included in the study. A $70. 00 figure was used since it represents a mid-range level. Once the Council makes a decision regarding the per trip generation fee, the bond amount shall be adjusted to reflect the new fee. 67 x 17 .7/1000 sf = 1185. 9 trips/day 51 x 17 .7/1000 sf = 902 . 7 trips/day Total = 2088 . 6 trips/day 2, 088 . 6 trips/day x $+70/trip = $±146, 202 10. That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff on a plan showing indoor recreation space with showers and lockers to serve the employees of the three buildings. Mitigation Measures Rivertech Associates Page 3 11. That the applicant provide additional passive recreation areas, with seating and tables, on the western portion of the property to the satisfaction of the City's landscape planner. 12. That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff in providing an easement across the far eastern and southern portions of the property to allow public access along the trail system which may potentially become a portion of the City' s trail system. 13 . That in order to avoid visual and noise disturbance to the nearby Heron rookery, construction vehicles shall not be allowed to use Naches Avenue S.W. between January 23rd or whenever the Heron fledglings have left the nests. All construction vehicles shall enter and leave the site via Powell Avenue S.W. 14 . That the applicant use a system of oil/water ' separators, catch basins (with filtration screens) and French drains throughout the site, or other acceptable recharge methods, in order to maximize the hydrological recharging of the area' s ground water table. NOTE: That the applicant provide a schedule for the periodic cleaning and maintenance of the oil/water separator for approval by the Public Works Department. 15. That the applicant restore and preserve that portion of a 50 foot natural vegetation landscape buffer around the wetland identified as EO2/3 in Figure 3 of the City of Renton Wetland Study that is on their property. NOTE: This shall be done in a manner approved by the City of Renton and the Department of Ecology including measures to protect the wetland from human encroachment. Such measures do not necessarily necessitate the removal of existing fill materials. Measures selected will be based upon a careful review of the site and impacts on the wetland at issue by personnel from the City and DOE. mmdoc - • • .. • I `1 1 r!•1 o'•L`� 1 9AUA "�Ya�„� ., 'S µ.. VI ifs 88, ‘..., . . v ', ' d I • : •, .t...t:* ,, 4?!. „ .- .. • ,,,,, .,:..,, - ' .?. ,, • . i? ,....\ gOr'4. ./ ilf,t • Pr . '.....1 1 . //0-7 4 ,,,,,. • ....,___ _,,„ . , N; s T - 7f-f4 lit p, ... IN R—.P- 'Q l' it? ,.,.,avid ,.,/,, , , :iik . / off''►0 ip?2 .-geo ° :v-:, `t o O`pp , rt p . . w.4". teAt4"4'41x04 '.(4'.'";:t;%...,?:.-4,c,..,:Jr - . _... I : . ' .::- / R-2 , r >� . 1 .5,:---: .2.-.:,.':',.:- • ''.: r 44*OPP ... " akce ,,40.44t-,44:4'4-44104,4; eft ' .. ; tie'';I L R°At.r44:*In I/°;#4$40 - 11 ) • -.. 's.,-P',, ' 0 1 R-1 • ,-—•• • FPUD— a37.+- Si . .. i su.•451- ii :OA - 4 . Y .'•• "P••••• . ' . tel. VIII 37 ' /7 1 ,�.\)„ 0.O P •.. , m... 0 . .. , 0., . •: ,.., • , . 0 '� �, \ , j , . ...____ j 1 --'1 . -..,,, •.. 4 1 a' '1 1 'I . - 6-J, 1..:...--. 0_0e NACHES CENTER 4PP ' SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-056-88 ' N . . APPLICANT RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES ' TOTAL AREA ± 10 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS NACHES AVENUE S.W. & POWELL AVENUE S.W. EXISTING ZONING O-P, OFFICE PARK EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF THREE (3) OFFICE BUILDINGS. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION. COMMENTS LOCATED AT THE 600 BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE S.W. • w • • • • • ��"' 'r,;, ' tip 1 ° i o° ° 1 • • • • .;,....,,...k,....;H•i:i..*:.:,i.::i.::,:i.,.i.: . .. • ,` ., t , ' 1 a II 0 0�9�0 11, )°O°O°O°• • • • • • • • • • I. • • • •":•. '1 • 000• , 00000000° • • • • • • • • • • • • • i I,'' �. r I0.0.0...0°o° o 0 0 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • m °p°p°°po0o6-, ' • • • • • • • •i • • • • • ;�iQOiA.� , - •ooao0o0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • --r�.■■ (;•;• ��000000000• ••• •R• • • • • • • • • • •• •';•', '"�► + •���1 0000°°°°°. • • • • • • • • •J•_•_r•; iic oiooa0o0o• • • • • • • • • • • •'o:°o' •( h o °0000 000 t • • • I • • • • '�: i'0°o°c / ' '- 1`4 -• °o Oo , ,n,•.••4‘.0g . •:00°000°00 • •• •• ••11 �.. • • • • • ?; '' o°o°• / o 000 000. 'm o°°op0000 • •• • _ ., • • • + • r' f.. s:141140 fr..,:..!:'...::.:::... ;1.104. ti.,, ,_•- •. ..cal •-•, ?0000.0 0 c, . 4, i y , s I • • ii ,.goc'ogg°g°O • • • i'• -=1.. -44- °I' 1 f.ik. i iir••• killilek •0- ! • l '• °- o0coo0g00000 ~.o.o.,f _ - • ''1•I' Ili fot 1 0000°° } 11 _i in —— \YGA. 1 , °,c000°0°0°0` 0000, r— `• litt ••• > _� \ rN o,� Ooo°ooO°°o°ooO Y�'�°•►iU i �1� , � 'Y,. 0000000• I 4 ••O• 111 R •: —1V �^". • , ogo0o0o000000°0r yt• A. i� 7V?"/�� . ii: {''�� i IJpi fT.�E.x..:?` S, '\ a `1 °pO°O°doOopOo°oOo '°•• 1 i it L! ,• 1 �• p°°0000°°O°000°°o 00 g : �. � ,� ,�a�ll t�: ..▪ _ .� �� ® ;EBB .!;-'�. �4,, i . <;�E'`� ,Q..s.rCyR •O•ooO000°oO 7', C ,�:.I • `/ r. r:)rv)" ` l ■ O°O°O°O°O°O°; : ■i■�1�T,`_ 1"F�' • •l,,<<,))t ,l .V ■■ o000000°000��•«OOi �-wy,. _ ,• • `1Cy S `...!';,e ` r' . :. • = o 0 0 ° ill 1:9 I:11`�•. -Frr,/r. •• t `!t� i, n� • • n ':::: a a a i:�::i.C::/1!:= oo ac 'a.�¢'e` P 4'''' • ''''. '1','.t.;cif^. . I' �f■. o '• ■■ 3: 'r•"(.• r' r iiiivil ' ae ■■ f S•UIIIt■■ I!■■ /`'• 'f.1.; ;4...,1 3 i iG:■■:r:■•■ ■1 ■{i.: ::::■1i■■ �. :r -.r� f S,,. w■„t '•, r •rit •■�f■li.•i` : •r']njiY:, r,• itp,•,?'.,„, t 17,1Pliciiiiillall*N,- ■.1■iiri.■ Irr'•r■' ` 't;;Si ":ti;;f.;i't',:G. :i:::i:::; :i:i:i:i:ii:i;:' ,-;...?„‘,. "•' _.' '- ------- : 4,144tH-;111,,e. ,il iiiiiiir la • iglir-i411111"7 1.1 -- _ ---- �� 7 i ?5r%`t;t:: ■. ilia r,E4%s.2? .i ' 'Mo'., ..:.:.:.:.,.:.: , , ...•••i I..,Z.,...:„.,... .flikoph...44t„....4t. •••1•••••••:•••:•:•:••.1.,•,•••:•:•:•:i lip • t ------- ` -Ul6• -_ ffir _---- 11Iiil2. _ � �,s• ilk ' • ><`., x` === == 7; ====_=-== =- === 1111111 mliiVJThIPfiflUII! oo °,000 '000°00 ~== - tf-- - — hJ.11 „ °°°°°°° - ` ' •~+< .�m. \ ` t:,.La.�"V;.,� ,w:,c,5 42.• , \'tc. "5-41.-:' . ;,. `,°0000 OO°°oOoO,•c:`,------ fro _ ■ r■ ■ ■;■■■ '` 1Gj;'•cS^;"`�,�7,+.;r�,` Si.• :f: 00000000000000 '• � �:i•�•r•('�;c�� � ('(000000000000000. =. --- _ � -`��- �;•I:�� 1 ■r■ ■■■rl� r(•,{j;..•�+ . ,'•r .�,_ •_. .0.0.00000000000000000.0.000 .'. - �*t• _ - �� : • ■■■I a'y; r�l:`•: ,'F,=. ^ • r—iYl -- '\ ■ ■■■■■igl:! .�t�' :: : ::::::':; i;,�?.". '.fib ' \ • 0°00°000000 __- _ z ' - \� �■■■■/� ••,:•; , ``. 0000°°° qqpp _ !- m ::::.::: ': :. 000 \•'��/ % A ". 4 0000• •••i•r• 1• = o f/Ge'-j,. .���--�' 7 •'•n.,0i"! .t,.' ".er" n •5r•'S?;` 000. z• •doe. 1 - 000 .• • • • • • 000. • io •• • .lEI■'■■��� ���: •fit+,' ,. fin■ , : ___— —__ __ _ , ';:::ig:—' it • •• �► U. ■E.- :•� 1.-- -_ flea __ .•;,,•.., r3., ■■■� ^; '' = _= '000 °°° ■■ .•.•.• •.. J_■■ '�'. 0000 All r _ _ =___ _-___--0000:____ :::�.. ■ •iv C +• nnnnnn 1 "'1. i i I I-,• I--,1`. ' 0000 ' e E 000u000 "�•;' 1 LT.. - --- -�- _ ---- --- ---- - •'4..., 0000. '�'ti: :•)0000°° j _ 0. p� • _- -- - --■ -r� - _—__—_ -- —_.!iIJ 11•` -- Iiiill =_-� _��-- -_ —_-MP_7MC3_- _—_ _ I ;:'- i 000000 ..�▪3 JV -- _ __ _ - ^t o00000 ?r'y - -- __-1' --- _--- _- cam: • n 0000- -r- • • •:: - -----1-_ •- • ' , • i' ,``w�,o`- :.1. Z. J il ' • G �i LAND USE ELEMENT 3.r-' a iIii r�: I :••■ur.■■l� ■lk r it '• 0•000• ■•■■ ■■ ■1 ': 0000°°° e.F� "" ; 1■C■�!■■1• R' Single Family 1PIIWI Commercial 0000000 •1 00• 000 .� .. 0000°°° •0000°°' ,,2 000000y �� ' Low Density \\ 0000°;' •A`` d Office / Office Park ��. i -1 ° 0000 �.� � Multi-Family ,..... °°°° •,,t.i 0000°.°°°°°. ..°°°°.0000°° ,..,„, O0000 0000°•. .,"_ ',. Aarl 000000000 "�6•�r••� v', Medium Density °°°0000 0000 o o'.'�.'�,�,.,�:; Fl.............. o0 0000 • Public/Quasi-Public ••• - -- Multi-Family oo°popoc ::� r 1 ': . High Density Light Industrial . t 1 Multi-Family 00, rC;,i;.rb,::•,' _ • • • Recreation �•'•.�. Heavy Industrial . — 6,... 'f: " Greenbelt --_= Manufacturing Park \•,..-1 / MultinhA nntinn o`e;. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (REVISED MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-056-88, APPLICATION NO(S) : SM-056-88 PROPONENT: RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three build- ings; a 3 story office building of 67 , 000 sq. ft. , and one-story office/ R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft. and 23 , 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue SW. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . Upon a remand from the Renton Hearing Examiner, revised conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee on November 2, 1988, under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . A Threshold Determination was issued on August 17, 1988. Comments were received during a fifteen (15) day comment period which ended on September 6, 1988. A DNS with modified mitigation measures and new conditions were adopted. by the Environmental Review Committee. There was a 14 day appeal period which ended October 17, 1988 during which time the proponent submitted an appeal. A Hearing Examiner public hearing was scheduled for November 1, 1988 at which time the project was remanded to the Environmental Review Committee to revise the conditions of the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated previously issued. On November 2, 1988 the Environmental Review Committee revised the conditions and issued an amended Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated with a 14 day appeal period. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: November 7, 1988 DATE OF DECISION: November 2, 1988 SIGNATURES: l , Ronald G. Nelson Tarty 'Sprin r Building Of icia Planning Ma ger �Ce yber 7 sting P e—Works—D e DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (RECONSIDERATION) MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Rivertech Associates ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-056-88 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-056-88, SM-056-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three building: a 3 story office building of 67,000 sq. ft. , and 2 one-story office/R&D buildings with 28,000 sq. ft. and 23 , 000. sq. ft. respectively. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue S.W. DETERMINATION: . Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a. Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner to ensure that, to the greatest extent possible, as many of the significant trees on the site. are retained as specified in the FEIS for the Blackriver rezone application. NOTE: Per the FEIS, a minimum of 20% of the site is required to be landscaped with continuous natural landscape materials and large trees may need to be placed in tree wells to protect them. 2 . That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner on revising the landscaping plan to include plants species which will provide sources of food for birds and small animals per the recommendations in the FEIS for Blackriver. 3 . That the applicant limit fill material to building pads and landings and that the applicant place only clean fill within these portions of the site. Said filling shall not exceed the 100 year floodplain level, plus one (1) foot. This material shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to it's disposition on site. NOTE: Minor grading of parking areas will be allowed sufficient to allow this use. 4. That the applicant work with the Police Department and the Public Works Department on appropriate haul routes through the City. Trucks will not be allowed to use the roadway (proposed Naches Avenue right-of-way) through the Black River site north of the Forebay area between January 23rd or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left the nests. • Mitigation Measures Rivertech Associates Page 2 5. That the applicant limit the operation of construction equipment to the hours between 7 :00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. , Monday through Friday per the Blackriver FEIS and that no construction activity shall be allowed within a 1, 200 foot radius of the Heron rookery (to the west of the site) between January 23rd, or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left their nests unless full visual screening, approved by the City, is provided to block construction activity, including glare from welding activity or unshielded light sources having an intensity greater than 100 watts. 6. That the applicant shall provide bonding, funding or other security acceptable to the City Attorney sufficient to ensure the planting of a treed buffer within the greenbelt easement to the west along the edge of the old Black River Channel, which will, at maturity, visually screen the Heron rookery from the subject site. ' NOTE: The applicant or his landscape architect should meet with the City' s landscape planner to develop a plan acceptable to the City from which cost estimates for this improvement can be derived. 7. That the applicant shall work with Metro to develop a TSM program and shall submit a copy to the City prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy permit. 8. That the applicant shall reduce the number of proposed (547 stalls) parking stalls by 70 stalls by eliminating 45 of the parking stalls and placing 25 stalls into a landscaped reserve per Section 4-2208 (12) . NOTE: The reduction of parking stalls is based upon an 85% efficiency, a standard for industrial developments of this type. To the greatest extent possible the majority of the parking stalls shall be eliminated in the eastern portion of the site near the recreation area. The applicant shall work with the landscape planner on the location of the specific stalls to be eliminated. 9 . That the applicant provide the City with a bond or other means acceptable to the City Attorney for their fair share of traffic improvement costs for the Grady Way Benefit area in the amount of approximately $146, 202 . 00 which shall be paid prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. NOTE: The above figure shall be adjusted to reflect a new trip ,generation charge currently before the City Council for approval. A range of mitigation fees are included in the study. A $70. 00 figure was used since it represents a mid-range level. Once the Council makes a decision regarding the per trip generation fee, the bond amount shall be adjusted to reflect the new fee. 67 x 17 .7/1000 sf = 1185. 9 trips/day 51 x 17.7/1000 sf = 902 . 7 trips/day Total = 2088 . 6 trips/day 2, 088. 6 trips/day x $±70/trip = $±146,202 10. That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff on a plan showing indoor recreation space with showers and lockers to serve the employees of the three buildings. • . Mitigation Measures Rivertech Associates Page 3 11. That the applicant provide additional passive recreation areas, with seating and tables, on the western portion of the property to the satisfaction of the City's landscape planner. 12. That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff in providing an easement across the far eastern and southern portions of the property to allow public access along the trail system which may potentially become a portion of the City's trail system. 13 . That in order to avoid visual and noise disturbance to the nearby Heron rookery, construction vehicles shall not be allowed to use Naches Avenue S.W. between January 23rd or whenever the Heron fledglings have left the nests. All construction vehicles shall enter and leave the site via Powell Avenue S.W. 14 . That the applicant use a system of oil/water ' separators, catch basins (with filtration screens) and French drains throughout the site, or other acceptable recharge methods, in order to maximize the hydrological recharging of the area' s ground water table. NOTE: That the applicant provide a dchedule for the periodic cleaning and maintenance of the oil/water separator for approval by the Public Works Department. 15. That the applicant restore and preserve that portion of a 50 foot natural vegetation landscape buffer around the wetland identified as EO2/3 in Figure 3 of the City of Renton Wetland Study that is on their property. NOTE: This shall be done in a manner approved by the City of Renton and the Department of Ecology including measures to protect the wetland from human encroachment. Such measures do not necessarily necessitate the removal of existing fill materials. Measures selected will be based upon a careful review of the site and impacts on the wetland at issue by personnel from the City and DOE. mmdoc .. . . ' . . . , • . _ . • TABULATION \ - SITE AREA 2.435,600 SF. . . ... - • \ . VICINITY MAP OF ADJACENT USES BUILDING AREA 2116,000 SF BUILDING FOOTPRWT 271,386 SF. N.,..*\:„.. • COVERAGE 227% UNADOPTED WETLAND 'I. SITE COVERAGE 216% . . - ,...... - • PARKING NACXES Ave. . . •--.„..... •. Eltio 1•`..,-$..;,.-•:.:••••:•1:-.:-;:',,,..:-.4:,_ LNG STANDARD .22 STALLS \ % • CO IMACT .217 STALLS MAT%) • \ . . A I 1 ,7f5:;...i:, .."'•-•:..i.;.4..741, ..-.::..°..: . , .. J1;. .. •NACHES,CENTER 7"..7,1 _ ..-. A ' IMACCAP Ts STALLS • TOTAL 55.7 STALLS 0 . . .1\‘,..s,„.... P ri. ,.. .,CL..., - .i.•(.Te...R. ..•-•--...._..v..... .. .,,:i‘• -"' • . .:_ .?..22...:. DM S.F.RASED ON• LU . •..---,--0-- ------,...,---if-__._- --• - . Ara EERCENCT a.m. A 00 TEAR VICINITY MAP Z \ • - . I), tilliallIW..' ' . / \ I',":4'.-0 61r.7- . 11N - i"$:: •$$ < I ..* , •i.',,i'..k CI jOr'• i 7-7T -T Ifil X a. _ 8„.. SWARM 4\,..,...,..._, OR. SCALE \ \ \ / • \ 1J‘Cfj.•••7!:".a 4 rra • ,... I . 0 • •et ''i.- - 11 Z vreorw...a....- C 4°241 UNADOPTED ..- - .••\\ ft) + ‘-.0+ '.- . I 1 • lo,.. -...._..--.A• °- . ''''. --.----){---11 41%r':'71111141(. " WETLAND \\ s.‘',.....\ ‘.. „.„... ._..._------ --: )r--- 0 SN,A14,44.01.2i,..• . r "..-..`. \ ...S.: ..N',:... n 0 11ff 1 • r) . • \ ; • •' ' . • ......\0 5031KINIBi 0 *1 < Ual "" .... \ ',............ .,,. .......\‘.•\N . i• . , . i•-•-(---- 0• ; : -_-.1. Z,.N...,..--,., mo.sx-,,i...S. NUB /1 = Z Cn l % 3. 0 0 .......z.am... . _______----_,1... _____N TA-ccr EINES-.‘ • ..;,:c...::.....N.....„. .....,_ MITI LU 1- •Lu . ..„ • c.,-,-,.. . 1. 71. -....•—....7".,......Z.Z.. Y •TREES TO RE REMOVED •TREES TO Le PRESERvED NOR. ' . •,• 11;.,,I...7, 1 ,,::: I/:-.,';'.' l.4+1..,,"."--r....1....,-4'1,4 I IS Xi,. - •1-1..--Z'....' '•,,,f.f.......,_ . .. •.• • . ---,..--.------ . . ...g.%Z., 1_....r. - •1 i i•ei i. .---..t•----d-%.;;. . - U----;.-- -al.-"It.t . , "....... _)-.--/ .' •..--Z.-!...t.isrm#G • ____ ..._,...,,No,,,,.,,I ,a aa.al• , .•p a.a•/••••1 ki p / .a• , . • ./..!-, •. 'I....,EU, /, MI IDETICLE RACK • - , ' 11 1 1 it ra-- I \ ii , 73:".,''''-•••-...-.•-CI-- ._. , • .!--., •_ • Ltp,,, , t, I ..--L• ..—.L.---.''; T'!! i• .'."-.4; :". •••)• (1••••:.,!•:,; I•,. •!1 I I•A '!•; "••/ i,-,,: ..P.NL,..----"...... --::-- C*-1.?...._PrhERN/p ' R.EX1STDP3 STREET IJOMT I IR 1 — — 6 .0.. t§ so....,., r, ,.. .„,j.."-"--,ne-i—r .1..' . 'k,• .-..,---...., / . ..:i..,. I .°•.....7.Z .::,„,, ....'- '.Z.c...,),A4,.. TT:PROPOSED smerr ue..Kr - LA's.../PflOPCISED EVE HYDRANT , . . k. '.:.,%•, --....;-,:,.-.,•••:-..--„. ._______ .IS ....—. : Mt —. 2 .i ,,1;9/ 7.,-;.....--•..,..., ..._._,.. ••. . . ••••• ..... - I a, f if:ell-. ,I ..,.; ) 1 ."":1 1,P; /•..1 .,.....,,,3.4'.....'''..:i--:;; ....I.' ^ 2i ,1 • -2..0t2.T....ff -----•‘-`..7,7;,,, -•i•;. . . =. __Lir •=-- ., A ; 3.., , - ,,/,7 ,,:::-....-.1. 7.: ----__„..4_,_ _ , . Ff.;;;IL,.....aer• 1 ...p.; ,...-- 4.. • 0 .1 .i 1- —., . I gl i —... -•-• is ! '.-2.: -,1_••.. — .•:_. IIIIIIIZ= —, ,,., ii,::::i'l --r-1,1 "-.:1 I.. -7---'----'---:,..liiii• tl. .*C-Ji EP 'ZITS'. :4' if i i-elo,o. , . 0. : 200 ••••' ///;, / '''-S....", .----;;-'..."-----------""s'..'i . --."........'............. .. ...,.....4.....7,-..7...-...,........,............. . "L ;+. .....,:.-•. - •-• ..........,....."....._.,11..........„. "i ' \\-,i..----::-•••• r 24--- , /7--•-- ::!::::',:t1..-:..2,-7.L,1 !I I I I!''1•_-_, /. t•ir- ,a__:._2 •. . '///, " \_ • ..!:-.-- -------......________. . IF • ••••••• •• ),, • •, ,1421, 11111 ...... !!!+,I ql:::I..., !..' I: 0.. .......... , ' ..... +-,.+.--•,...,.,.. . ••//' • . .1 I..'t 1.-• -....,' . • • • ,-' ' ---- •-•! ..__________„„....‘‘ 1-17/. !,..--.-A. -:-...=V:.=-...‘::1•-: *A2',..; - • - li; ./...--- - -.., ----- --,.....------.•:- ....._ .: -. ------ ---- •---.. . . ,.// • ;1 1 t.i..i,, .I,,I it,r.1 i 1 I It iiI111:0.:,.: ' -'"''' '--- , -1---. ---2---------- • "‘-\-....-------......., I ,.:, --....-1,0 • • ..... ..G.---:,-;---„,'s. - ...-• Y 4/ "• . -"°-.• .."---- " v".- ..e.”.=--_._ :Ai .• .A.2. ....i.;.....Y...:..(,,.;/•—•••:SX..------ (,,O.",---77-7-"----- ..„,........- 4 -... ..-. 4 r 1 ..„...1_20," — ---- . . .. ••• •''. 7, --- -.4-,-- -m._ t,..a...L .. fgi.H..„'.:..;...........1/4._______-, -7--.-..1.w....17... -"777--...7. - 41454,...- 7.-- r....:, ......:_ -___..,,_. .,_.. .,-"matsimmur---, --. _.... - Li-- --:"-• ----'------ - I U7 . \\_\::: :'.., t t f;:;•:-7Z-3zi, '1{.n 1....-r i .'il ,'..,c .:, :'.':-:::`,?,- 1 i .1.‘, ,. •I ??PT•star 1 Icy Lamm 211.aaariarr um I ( 1J OTC _I 6 lir EX.S,00...,...6 L..... In I • -:;-.7.....;;CUSS CA,A o'.NR 3f,prompa L TRANSPORTA . .k •: . ."..,1-tt• .1____11____11____F7-7-1_11 77,--rr,....7 .. Of OL MO OAS EILDNAT I Garet,.De....4rE •• ,''''' aa•••0...,11,4,1,1,*.7.0",,,,Sa a Sla.kLa '11: 4 —..1....yr.i....„...B•ND .MSC V I -.T.; NO.DESCRS1101. CATE CUM I '41.° I 1 .. • Ems.. 1 KAMM EMS..AMMO! I ! . , 21 MALMO I I i I NACHES CENTER i . ,-.1 //-114ALCING 2 .- .t•: SITE PLAN / . °RAMAGE SwALE a '4'!, / pvil-" THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES Eini000 S/01.2.0 1 RI - —.-;---1 .........--.......---. RENTON.WASHINGTON ••...-t.t.,::. .. . ro SITE PLAN • EZISMO GRADS / SITE SECTION A MO' ' 14 . JOS AO.8801.IG0LET AO OF . . • Caat•.... e . ' . . . . . • . . . . . . . ..... • Alonnommommommilionsnmemonm ..e \`. . \ PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND \\ \ • ' . . 0 erk•Arkm ora.4242.4,-pao-.r., ge,.....i..,40 A.. rivii.P./-1.71-E,....*fer...¢. ....1u.a.,./ 111....errtg•-i Nra.,07 • • . ‘ • , N. ,,,,174a47.,S.,ca/.7*W.•-tr.,• ,,,-,ry•rt.G, ( v . • - - \s (.0 ..n 494.1...i.. Ws..9..,ax." 14.1.-.141.4..1..4 01.0 1,Ari.....e0r14.1 4,-1 r,...."...vao-tA z,,se..;•1; r-.4,00,,,,, er....--t2-,^I...earl:1,0j 0..G....V-r-s.r 2?›.....7.0/,'1....e.1.46,f,re..0.1.41,:e.- cn .,\, \"\, •...: erie..V.0-....fry0s. ....r.0010 ',2,.....0.2.7t0414 grrX7 01111,4-,..."40,,aa FAINF-F11-"‘ •• 2:024. tear,1,•-,,.,0.. tj-k, l rae. al \ •,. Z \\ arrEr.brfr•t_ .4-1 ••••••ran-a-tta,rsaeti_ •*,..0-,•46•44-• •,4-1-40.-,0444* < c"."") ..,1,-..e.•••,-,,Fr,ibiv•-,...ove.a...,rA-45‹,,,.....2.9,, Wa.S., • - 6.,41.,,,,FV7 L.,.€ 9.,...,+.4 A....,(..„00E27.4 \ " • t,,,,...., ,..„..:••„...,... -i,ii.r.,11,...--,:14..A1d,..t., I'fre , :". ...,.... ._..,(fte,...."A I( .e**.•cbc•- o- Fr O,,••V,Ek••• • III E •••e.d-r..--res4, \\''- • i''' 0 1 .7a,A2...7 .x. ,-.; ,.... Z 0OZ 1 .......,-.......,- \ '.•:\:. • 4* 4 ‘....- '\, 't=Aw.,A.v atai,ai.....ev .1 l'r.st rtAL lb....4, L1.1 Z c.91— , J \ \ 0 < z ,,,.. .„ift..-a..e.".• rt0.-1:44./02 '''•••••11•1_, ...4soel.•••-t_hi,...f....y.v.rf ...4arr.i A-p.t..•5 ••Wa...wi %. .‘ =1-1.4.1fi.e. 9+0.1410,,1 N.(co-err...41m. • /\ \ Cn • ,„ ! N 1),4. r t..K - w1 • 9 „ .\ ne ..'y g C<i LLI = I If \-----i\ • • . .. - _ (---, , = 0 cn z- . , % .:•.. 4616,-.... , ...Itt...,...„------ , N f&SOT E MANX '. ..,..N...... (F) 0 . t 1 ift i,i7ftw'r-4 ,....... .......,......—...,.......dog.:....,...,-- „... — al =,, ,...... • 1„ cs. . --,,, ....,...:„ ..„.:, z 1— cc . . . _........ .......... ,.,--, „ Q...trrere-1..0.,'err 1 % ,it , ,... • .... --... 1..5....................., 0 . . 1. . - ' 6%— ---'-4 • .4,,,tir ,..,,10. , ,,,, ..0.• , , iitkua.,„ ,._...,. , .,.. ... _. , .15. .,Hi • i,; s -- --. :--.... 1431- ar,„,. ,-1-,,I.itr-; s....c.,..-,,-;,,,a ,....1.4- .. •. . , . . ... .) lai. V, -It—-••!..m.146.:,.... P',•,-',"Iffirair-• L-'iftric -A latiffaiiiii./•, - /'''441-'e- .i ---------:----=----=-----.... -•.,_,-------:7--- rke Ai•we,ior. A......1...1 • ••••:..takii i It' -.t t— =`, . . '.Kdoilommomm•AwlfAlliSit ......4.1.0.0.1..a . , . .-Vr.. "/// l'IC.C.ti: -- ----•-•,..„- .._. . g I 4--?.'; • - iiill -, it' 11*.D'air.ci -..._ . • . .. \ - • . L., ‘'41 Nt, ......- •••-.- / - .. ,. 4760-,...........,... • 4,10! - ....-.;<,-...-...."9.'"4%.144,1 A-i,verf.z.„44‘- ,---,.... ...::.-----______- .... • 3. -......../..7 it— . .‘,. - - lia 'I.111i105101 "..muitiov-4 il 1/A•AAE 33. / ' r I.,. .-'2.....!':-.1,--.........--....1:-.7-..:....7„-._ me r , . .........,...,....." 00 ...-- ..a..ef , ot,---.......-- .1 ' '' 41c-- "i//,,-. ''..-..*. -.....ri,•-2--,... .-1----7------ I ,...7.7.--z. +roe,'inhale d.,---t-17 • .,h- ir;- - ., ti. ii " - ••i,,v., .,..t a ..e.”......... -.011 . cileff7„ (,../... ,1:1;1144%,....,41::. .1.----- .-- ..------=-7:7-7=-.-A-- g 1 40 - ....w "..i --'i;,,, -•,- -='_••=r-....._"-----....., "Oldgrill 11%0 tee—mdlIE—--- ml"hlt 1 i--",la 11--., f-4/•••--:-.1.;•.-V4el ' wwf- • / •.• \- -------- . -7 • \\.4.------ --- , ., iiIII;(11.. , ••••; -.• „;,,, •.•: ,1 1_ -. -. -_. 4!1 1 i"!!,.. .--.-1.aim,!!,. ,. 91 ,. ,‘1 1‘,, ligfiniargir!--,..,.... .- 4'...> :/* • I ' As alltirfito/M ,., •1-------.... --„, • .// I t 1 VA.' "7:,•:. _...g3 A . Y' ' - 'irdnr__A'.."11...V1k.4.'', 37 .. --"--"--,---„,---:-•-,...__, ,, ...._....,-..-__.- -•-•\__.___,,--',. ...,,// , ;; ;III!Illi MI'A. ''.:„: 11:MOM. , ..,. ,/,. • / --N.,. ,-,..,t I ; , 1 , : ---- „._,-------„.7.7- ..___,.:-....„N.-... - ______-- ..._ ._. _____,--2.-;.----;-_,_----,,, ,,,____, - -.. ! •-- 1 ---,,_--,._--,:___:--- 2i.. .,-_:::-- -- II ST IOW We/1ST . i ---,- --L.__ .--.-,.- --.,-,,,,....3.. ' • I --....—,,..— -/_7-- -- , - - . '1 ES/ST•03 1,01.0.0E SWALE I I . . 1.---''';'r----------.. I I .M.4f.16-..r. ./..,-• ..7....11--/ . fr.4-a-L'',.,"4-1 / ui I 1, L ACCESS INONTEMANCE EASESENT .30.PM-WE•TNAAISOCOVATION.--1__11__El__177-71___n_______.r1 • ..-- /• .• . ,,...,.. 6.,a OF ON L GAS EASEMENT 1 r • i. .1 ./i 1 c5 i .7, . NO DESCANT./ SATE . i •• 10-E.A,NoNN NANNN...7-•-06 I Mind°ISALSANO 11 L MONO I MALMO 0•1:6 I i LEGEND 1 , ' NACHES CENTER The . - . .NATO•ranrs Mitchell LANDSCAPE PLAN .,....,•I MALIK I """'''' THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES Nelson -..... . Group . . . 27-2,- is7-73 , ...,,,,...,,.,...,,, RENTON,WASHINGTON Inamporated *L-7 ' A 1N0 Pk..INN* LIN INAANN ....r.A. 02/Pm INN Soo 303 .. .../NAFANCICON303030 LANs,AN* LANDSCAPE PLAN 4174.. S63 Swat AN.*MI )ANN a Num .3.3...N...... Jos.m14 SKr/NO C. DM •,,,,,,/,' e ' . ORM.,.,, 7 of 9 • . . CFECA••••::,1.. . . • TABULATION . - SITE AREA 2435.600 SF. • •, MUM AREA s777.A77 S.F.\ _ VICINITY MAP OF ADJACENT USES \ 6ULDM(-FOOTPRINT s6t,197 S.F.S -�.\ Z COVERAGE x46% WETLANC D i.I - SITE COVERAGE 215% WETLAND Z t IITFS1.1a.Os �• PARKING W 1 .AC.Ea ae" _ +'.c SUR[/ STA1oA{D •aa muS 2 �•I MG ON eor•eT :ISO STALLS(aTT:1 U N ••.j.-NACNESICEr ..'-.-c'�- r'4Wr`_ Rg4,40 rem woSUL"vx.v.o.a%an. w .' C �: •T -! ;•.,..:�C.T. reSe.TE .a{ STALLS L . -1.�."-�.!' .•4:;4'-`,_rrr,4_='~z• �T.-^- _--__ -.. _ .•JAL... TOTAL. DS'S STALLS VIM{XX Sr.OP. r N. • -• �_,. •_P,,...-w- IooTlA.nooa►L•r VICINITY MAP Q Cl) • c , till 'II I NW ^ • ,`\\ ' _ • .GT. Stu I ' SM..V ,' 1� ...r•...v { UNADOPTED �\\ < l ... s �i ...i.�n.j rEm O cn _ b..TT...o '�;. ;ra•t_-:::__.�.. _ h ram= v Cr)WETLAND a IY- = 9 c ' S. •\ . : n 0 1 T . . ,,AT.:, • \ I 1 `",` i '-.aTTr.o�MCC ._•-a.r _ T awes I Y M >_ Z - r renALo SETAACS •I' - • (p IIII VI W e pa i=_ — i '+a �� — .�r-. D u_. ..m LEGEND 1 1 S I • ,' l. •• ,:`t'I I... �• �, / k Q.:,...`2 /� .•....�r.'IS neae{veo 1 : ` 1 � ` \ \ I 1 \� ' •/s7` UR • s•ACTG.{Aat .I' ' 11 1 11.1 1 1 i iei 1.1 I l y r-6t I -� //, i ,•. - �� LiAttqV / o MOO 1 .-.3213.03 STRUT EAST .i� - _ .�� -. . —1`c1\`I / /•T�,�_- T' �NRg4�D O ruin s[hit r1131.00.MAT t W 1 r / \ I "seu-r -'—`:i►yj Twu.e.ewsu.E rn.. ��• - IIi }ii'ri - =TAM v. • — 217$7T0�11YSF• -' ` t 111 - - `_ _w.a...1 71. .t asTon r.12y TS�iI '''}. \� ,„„, s> • '\\;i= ;� 3q/��'(' �e'es. 1 I� f:—._•1.:_„..._',Mune— ,i . 1 P L_ 1= ��i 1 h� • '' �.. '�. r,_ // • ♦ 4 'I ?I I' L. u I I rr•..•c. `!gym . 1'a'..Ti....ns1.' o. •`°.�•:rV.i� •��.0 • l •L �`"�' :�`= _`." Jam/ I •1 a {•� ���\ }:. E e r. � i"�I3I I I!! I I I--I I I II.:,- .�. ,m t� �_ - > TM ...�. .f,. i 1 ' _ , '. _ - • _�. / erns r{ur ..� -� i • d.,�, - -... ! easTeo o{ua•o[E.uEJ / t �• _ \_-_ 07 ' 1 ua -�� ,11 :�••..cper .41 ;1 i/\_a'AECE..r— / SInS41•{•rIILM -_ - ..'-"F' `...i.._.u.1 o'c`v+o...- e`as..ter .wv_.mo� r_r��D ..x.•_J yj a-.r(s ro�.o.cTo ECQN WI�RIIEIEZ 44..IISrrFNr�� V_�_' r>•�•:+- S'e•_i= y. • ...1 ` IFO .1 1 OR .- • Sher..®— — .��L...,,,+moo^ wow.Last., I wa.Sa use[a.i Ee'+ ', ., —' •,•I Fri ' T I LLTC�6D �' TOLD CJE/W nu," Ot W 4YIC.Of _= —_.—� �K4 '--ram._ ' YFT.r LrA.wf ! spe.ML..T..'Va.6K • �— - - • , "' I ,.I.e I o rare tow.n ;.. {:I m I {uTsq YSSY ri IMMIX S DOM it • NMwrN c^T +-• - Sit Q I 61 • i . • I / �"'r" at li. / RIVERTECH CORPORATE CENTER SITE PLAN '. -=� 1C/� t WIC — I GA"A°""L' _ I ,,,((( - till Rig RIVERTECH^ RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES e•• D .. iw •m RENTON•WISHNGTON • e:mTEc o.AII SITE SECTION A V66• _ a oml.�OW o C• Dm um of 9 DE.1. +1 . ,.\' PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND i \ 0Trr>te[.,crs+cas.'QEb-ra Rti•Y.y n. rb'eln- ,.-. !Weft. W - •. \\ 4•'-- - L"2 .1.16.0 farxx.2.7 orsr+-td60.,cry,rv!..r.,ram( .awe.,1 a+l OYa,o.,. Z \ ro<� xf acar, as eew per,,Ic eww .. Fa tFKa may{ na.,oro tra¢}•"r,.na..r,��.as..y:m.mD,'..••-a!�.,.so'er U li \� tt ecnKL—zy.{, , ..or0.0,.Pi,...torraei Cer[oaf;./ bY rJ'" IEIaL A.:g W . N. azc..• zesP-,i ftsidala. $•ld terr ;\ aK+nr,1 merles.+ -w.ay;_i •gas.,, .wS.Hn►.�la+rE aU) i1vf�+•//�, k�Taf�fo^.rvx� a Gf venrti CC W ,\ ♦f)lIML.,, Oar!• as„eoo,•,-ifq..Ke� 0.v'.% O i— _ r- -z .O •*ta;..x+ ..r,K.rtkf.—tF,✓Ji- h.i-Pr' -•, //�, Q ,\ -ReteM1,l...v.e u.'a.o.O- -1•1 D 15°ou LL .�...q• :\ v �,.eeaa a•VP z.sr+r ni •E„w ,r+w-Ghl. O V fir.-".»�- root,or...eo i -*to, rat . . F ��..pr1.40av s ..rm¢•�-ro.r,oRe e.rr ..r„i �.re •Fits., U N Z .•r..... • ,, .."ears w,c.rxo of(o.rrwsa. = Q ••ww+.�• .' ags• • U = c7 1 N �•.....��. T\ m G IL•E ,4aFL.rf 11.K Wed..** -b eo xre..e0 N • U •Z `. !\ ...oauow ren +T' ...a.e. ..wM o.6o..1 W 2 / ��� II+OTfrR Y6.n.G{ I— W As wax, 1 .... Y. 61/111 'III *L� .. / \ V /' ..oc �� .�.."• 1 `. ' CA N.1. ca rvQ - 1f Igo. � ii, b N z, oa e -e . " . . e a l ' „ i tr UL 7: .. .• %--, = �..:. . III y ,,1ii Ir r. ' l 11 r 1 ‘ llw I � / ,/ b,� ' III�"4=��IrsI I Ie'I-I-I-I�I''f %•/LtL ,ll, -Pkil : /1�!1 ,i ' �J- 1-- - 1 I I _ yo1,r/'o' S . � 7 • 4- • ;, ,I(•,- I I I 1..i /Mg:"- ✓..ve s•iEl (� ,c(.�c easfu6l , , / fr! '1, ii/ �� ,v rwa.�•,n.,.row.. 1+.% •I1 Ela -- I 1 n n -_ _ n i 1 I :' Or OE..G.,EASE-MDR . - S/`.J .0 DESG.E'Tgw DATE - 1 I 1 r DESTSKI IMMO 1 r RAMO MALMO 3/ I �� 61 , LEGEND The Mitchell LANDSCAPE PLAN . .. "., "k.A Nelsonrp IH` ' RIVERTECH CORPORATE.CENTER ""aIncorporEted RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES I'' . ,.�:.r�::m -._s RENTO<L WASFCNGiCN ...s�f JT+Z+. eT.G o • .D� ":' of 9 . . • . ,. . ... . . . . • . . . . . •. . . . • •.:: .','.. .•i Ir.!! 1 ' •:!,..:•• • ' •'NA,.:' .' . ••• '•f• 'i :,•• '...! . :•,1'.. .' ' , • •. . ••••." .,i!,',1• . .r., • 4:, . '..',': ,4.••••,,ikl . . :.1:• ..,:•;1 rii __I/ k•—:••II 1 II \ . ,,• h 0.; NAVIES Gd/E..s..w._ ..._,.., :-.•'•,"':" .--------- ). . ---- 1 ,-.1 : .1 h .. • li. . i'l • 'i. • •. .1.tik.. ----i•-- r:::li • 'ii NSA r.,. ,f•^ .,. I, r L L . .,'.•. l'i' .-:-:-.--\ 1.`" 1-1— — i i' `. .' ' ., ,L • ,......4 I _„•,is.,,•\,, . , / ; i iti';',,/,'// " .1.1 t ..., /:(''. 1 .' 1 'Ili II ' L 1 . r % / , .1 r.• IJ, . ei. I I I:. g wri L y.-ig----it . .,,u..'.. : :4 ....,,C .1/ill.. ..• t , : • n . E 11,i 'N- - " E ••••t- ----Tf• • . . .. .. .,...., _ , :. .i 1.- 1 ,, ., ... :: II .• • • it t.t. i :' • , ').. .7•.%f, ••\ p 4 ig ,) • 1 irl r0'\;.:•.\\ I ' .*E4.— V /••• /1./.. / ...? . . , f r% :\•1\••, I 3 i rv'l ,./..../.// \ j)Sil il il 1 ... i I . ,../f li•••' --.• 1 r 1 tw , t,,i, /// , .. • '-'% • r, • i'. / . • . . . ,..../ ,ka B ,' 1 I i..., . .,,7,•./ / ,,1POWE II INE. '•—• il I / • / li / ,... f ..p. ./y/ ------\ : 4. /,•I -I) • .1 //if ......._,...... ..,,, , , , . /, :• t :_il . /, !i,,fi/ - , 1 i.g. , /,-./i 0/ .. , .1 '5" L. ' ' .. • • • 1 • 1 11 • • r 0 • ll 1 . . i .!•.11/ lip// 1, ' •t,// '•, • . h„ \1(1111:-.. -- ,' Ill • i\ - 7 1 ll'ii !„ il lil i " i - 711 il... 1 ii////// • 111•'. . f' //7/ • 1, 11-::.: : 'iii i ,..,/,.... ..0 .„,...i, . ,,...., i ii :. to 1 1 0.DI r ' 11 :II i', i',',11q'Tif0. t 2 , • .P 11 i ;-.Q. ..1.;0,..,' • f A,1,,I_A, .. .t!A*,,,11.4..Is, • ' IL...I 1 1 i:::i.or•1.,,, f'"I, 7.4,...3423fot,..-_, . 1. • . 41 ' i , AAmistr ...- t; . -19 _ F . ..t .t...-; ' , :-.. Ji.,:;•1.. 1 , _ ..e..• pl F,:lied: -1.111i-- --....._ :• i I • .it ',•''Ill lob 1.- : 1 '':',ii - • 41,1 iii, , ,,,. • ,... /// . . . 1 r i... , ,,• 4 i . ;. 2 '- (y1 11 4..nr- - - -:-.------z•- •. • i iii .,: • , . • • . . „ ..., .. —.:.,... . Mu\ '':.'r:--/. • • - ,--4 -, • 1 /• ... .*.l. . .1 ! I 7; il 1 SCHEMATIC SANITARY na ItSEWER,WATER&STCRM DRAINAGE .,.f.- .. NAC HES CENTER r'''‘, HITCHING%INC. _ — --- AIL ENGINCHIS 8 LAND SURVLY011S SEAL — D 8 ''. I p , a RENTON WASHINGTON BRH — '" ''''''-- ,,',:roet , .... = s 3 • W_ 1 J. - 11T-r JrI 224,10' QZ . 7T-9' r 59'-5' 7T'-9' 1 89'-1' 7T-9' CC li. Brick Panel 1 Mechanical Screen—I �Concretle Panel rTinted Glass W O - 1 �_� 11 _ 1 1 1 i I '— III z (-) Z \111i111i1 IIIIII!I! If � �� ,�� liii lil I�!I !lI i ; 1iuIat • •�° III i II• \� litMnOOH 1_11 I11 �.�duu Cn = Q W Reflective Glass—1 1_ U Main Entry = z (> N O < W ~ BLDG.1 EAST ELEVATION = z BLDG.1 SOUTH ELEVATION Z -I— cc ' L / 224,10' ; i 15r-r { . 59'-5' 57'-0'"__�__ 57-0__� 59'-5' 1 I 59,5' -9. yll .. . - .o moan". mare I I 1 I I I 1 I (_- —,-.'c— -_ --- :ram_ - -rL __- _ = ill !HI ! II! ! I / 11111.IIII! t_ I 'S�'� �.. 1 I I�' iy:- Ill II II 11 17 :E?_.- ,r. f . I i I I 01 611 1 I I ,- _ _— 1 • ,.a.--,, - � I I1 1 I. V I ( i I� I I I r ' 1 H I 1 I I) i l l I l i ,I 11 1 I ��;�,.'. I ( I I I I /s Secondary Entry J Secondary Entry— 1 I BLDG.1 NORTH ELEVATION - BLDG.1 WEST ELEVATION , 1 NACHES CENTER ELEVATIONS I' ' ' THE SCHUMANWASHINGTON COMPANIES BLDG RENTON, ' ELEVATIONS BLDG.1 • M1U 9eo14 smear.o - mono. ca I a 8 of 9 c.eu.Me. F .. -� .-•� a -_-�_-.�_-_�._ • ._... ... �-__.-_.- • 120' . 310' - 45' 129' . C LU I (ii (I i I i I. i r I; (I (i 1 r (. r—�— ��`JI 11`'t-t'f • ^--tt I W BLDG.2 WEST ELEVATION - BLDG.2 SOUTH ELEVATION W G 310' y 120' - - I 0 ,.a' r sa .. Z U z0 . • I 1 I fi W Z ,�— b V a Z - , , � i I � I r it IF firm-Fi[l7 r (n D Q BLDG.2 NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.2 EAST ELEVATION _ --_. ..t.. N 0 BUILDING 2 - Q W . Z H CC_ Painted Tilt Up Concrete Panel 7 Tinted Glass- —Reflective Glass - '-_--^-_ 128' _, 270' -.. ilp �zo—� 0 aer _" __ . •O aauiPr,O. DATE .. 4.a....,1: BLDG. 3 WEST ELEVATION Entry(typ.)---1 BLDG.3 SOUTH ELEVATION 277 / 55 .•-•- --- l_= f BLDG.3 NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.3 EAST ELEVATION 1 i BUILDING 3 _ } NACHES CENTER - . THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES BLDGS 2 8S3 _�..' _ ii.i_. y RENTON,WASHINGTON - _ ELEVATIONS BLDGS.2&3 —_== _r::'S _'.:-:'- '-___- =,-:_ - . y JOE MpB•OtAbKR q 0 DATE __ .....,«. 9or9 :. max: .__ 0 C.f .PD.. • • • • • • . : • • 9B-lZ. 6�L H .:.... ... . .I. • —___-�.- •N • .. O to _ .: I ._ _ •- ,_by A • 'ri:.h• 1' /50j71'r�+p, • o - — •' — p •—— m 0281 He•lf..:::: • L:c.": "y;yr•.. 1�[ i o p po Op ---_—_o— .. [-II ...jaaM f-rg.•:; 6, w..7.2A.. '- - ---'--- --- a.'y.a-.NU-__.. 'I i i 'I . :: �I� •1 .. I • • I 1:. _ K•a.•rs'.wr .t.2'a•rj•.r•. er"1..-7 • A., I S' �I ..�.. mar sH_I / rn.r rC_w iL of"r•TJ nNi`\1 ` _—_-- . .. • I.^ i .......,..... .. .. I • .... �h 3 r:::: ::r:::::: I::.....' O'L '- -?c.o•oo -- • - y. or•o m—Dc----' — I... n • tip •I : .'. �.: . • • .. ir._-.__-________ • . .ocY rr r•r c .. • m I . e� In • • �dml• �' _ _I---`----�.--- ----won; --- _ i fr..rnr,w - h1- - -S.L • . I::. — er VI .L IN D ..:::: ::::.::. p Z _— .�� \ ._ Y•2'e-0/ 1w3 , 2 N 3. ...... .... .... '1.:".. ' ,1 I. 4. a wr,Y•rsrac L u / .-- [ a 1 • p. —KZ m • 2 Z • = a ra.o< c••ar.»rea 4 C�� a[ [--_—_— U ZpOIr{ �::: a o .E 1 an inw [ 2w z ........ ::: ..:::::::. mg O fi '1 I 1 2 . ---' - ,. . cn p ` q ....... i y w 1• • • • • x P. . ......... . ... . .. ................. • r. r r'.- 41 s=1 -lawn �.• iPwv c,•2r-JY a - ,04;,1 •zlaoH 31VOS i. a •losaMl>irr) naliaWS y..v1%.a✓a,so - •Los• o.rs-- a/OI/2 'ma a.,w .crow m.aare,.1,0 r.0ra o a .�.V.I.! i ii.i>: o..v o a �aerr BMW/ zc•ir.or or d a ors-r if a•c arafir ID 09.09 Ai l..s.rr..v< c c .s....,•rz ssss►iroo�� =�r C 9�f10A a�.u<r .:. ���.. crow .r • � -rw.r wn WV so a .i: _ 9 nro<rrr u"n.or r�r cr �-� a rcwz _� • z' I r.o. .v..rorar a.eie".. =O u.wwr>onr roac.� \ iigaimui.........._x ...7______/,..,..., s ( u a Haa r 0 Y e • . _ `.1 / t Z. I +•'F � ..a crow �' /~ or-. .<a• . d = • • MZl 6L.Zl NI �� -B- - I_> . 02 /vCS'3nd S dN c"NOhi . \+\ \ 'a _ 3o3sr.I:, 8 'r_`loa'r.'.T.0>.27-0.. f. ,� ece -•..wnr.0 ....ce . sK i::r 2rvi: "aL__ pa aw.orLr.2/n . N .MO-•.>r:ias no.r r /Y. narr"2, rsa♦ .<rinaw �1_-`� 1��` ln.e scow-n» fa E <>.!/ .r r S 91dI1 L s N/cY0 11.'� \\\\ \ fn)S'�»�.7.Ir oi.. 0.,0 '•'\ Ire,orb .yr., rd..rw ...worn.," I.•tr.r> ..b p) a.'.•rr. rr r. r� r xrc o..r.ors n •' _ [)1 _ . ./ r o '<eo'rrr'rrr>a i:o,'�w.n>:.�`..• fD <s j;•:r .c•cr. _ • 0.1,We✓ o sonar rnw•<,alvaiva+v>rlau<wgr r..o►snc lx uvr•or r \ a-r+� aa.rag. c+•or >a).... <a ro Y< <r.w• ri>'MC•CV v ` j�f w•• <�ar•sr.< Y<a • x oc o it orr-aro_,.ar r »vr< z « •ir r.i.ry ..aa r� • -rr yr" %Pr 0 o.w•.rr r r 4 I d .77 L.R..L-GS.R Y 0.40./. If p 1. . • IL LF_L•71.1...a.III V. HIw,YO,UP I / -Sf 71 V a SVf'JLLT LTI ,/.JO.,L•!T I` w✓G L MI✓YOLL I,L Z t a CH ..,. — -- v$ _ ES—AVE S LL.II• L<Lonaa\ . . o _ _� 91 u � f E ��_ 11 I Wz .lfT,✓, n..✓YKd r „• — _• " ,ro BEFORE YOU DIG S JTI e.7�,iaT . ^ .m .won 14004245555 co i L.OyM.ICT Y.I„l0 7 f O Tse.. a �` L.L/-I. O./Ox / m j� 1 r�,J�f'.T ..,r.cL.. ....._f-s o..o:c n.s ooclNra w�.nr.m I K .. , ✓u E,fY/EPl1Yf/1 IQIICIES YIO 6 SCALE HORIZ. 1:40' • V E R T. 1=5' ii �rt?j; t 1 7 II 1 — is ;I . . _ . .- - - --'- •9 i ••• i QI • I I I . — x •o .. . li : '— - -- a --T - — . a. . . _— —.- -- - — — - -- ' 1 . . ' ... w 'i� Z2o • • • • Y 20 • • • • w :... .2.0 - I', • •.: C'0 r -.1n.GL.•J7_1.. Z _ .. ri• yfL.w.7__ I N till• \1 -- 1: : ..1.ts... --. �- --- - — - - — — -- -- -- - -- I. . : . U 2: >go ...: ..:...: . . . . : .: A to ,L.o ... i:'�...... Z Q' G z I J 1 S .... . '. : I :-- - . .. j: f:rGrunvs sifsf- - :• i ei.o�O - 1.0 .. .. .. .. .. :L: .....:-O . I o.t .. .. ... ---� � /,. . �,.w rc.zn \'MY Gc.sm L.V.fL..ass ..:.L:':. .. . I �Y¢ • I. • .. ... .. ..I .. O 1r'�:4d . I 8 _ . .. . . . . 4.1 0 • • • 1 4 • • • (JTA Ko • .zoucLaa MI6 /-_IILLw¢YYD. ,K l-/L'd/TIEGFaT rAr.VE.M. 0r}4Q [ 7 i 'Y /.rAr,/••ar ' uc •e • to c.]J.Ir¢T T r I-P 0AW COW.salt ,` Ilion ro couaaR,DM FSUU. S..-,.,,s MooTDO1rW OUT L7 I.-FLi MVP.•NfY,MJ-L" TESTIM6 COMFl6UATIOu,F161 ./8-TVRODS \ -IL-.L'aLDYcaL,rL )� THIS SMELT. RIMDVG E;.OAS.AM" CSTA.a•.S.JO 1 So cE a"0./Ji s CONMECT TO E;K"UMW( F 16. I • 9 MAIN.1.5514 E DETAIL F1- J_2"T+A//.do✓../w33•r TESTIIJG COMFIGLLQATION THIS SHEET: - /-CON'.tIfE JNaTJT(>.SSS/) \' ?y T /T at Ia D.LI. T Mae IY O.Lr. C (J - YYVI/�..RTO `Ia STA. 4B[LZMJrt FL.4'eT STA.//•CG o! v —�_ ,^O' y 4 aAV, 1-ruic uMll.R..0 �T 11.60 _ V R•el.5s /-Ym,.I.rwD/GIGE,nkT I .LE r•a[AaIT l /••-SLEEVE L•Zo>SJ tt EYE WYE FOR D.o//-OFF,rt•RT =tall _ I __ p- — n./.-.u'-'z' Lz-'4. e,tCn JC1M-Waurin.nrarAc FIG.i 37A.4'37 / `—._• mL-r WP -- FILIAL CDNNEGTIDN UZ L..aD, 1 TOv-r..mc 4. 1 I-• �r I :..� — rm• W IA:�_-- _— OW 3 I(•���• 1 ���al' .r.e.. Q cae ISTO.J.4 wnr. cT•-,•.•.ae•er. .('_�— ; ' IT 1 \Z '' Der. =S iao•••.... ur:a YAWL I I` I T•.... _ «,�� • Cn v g t STI.T•TT_LO / �, Li Va..e.a.So ; 1 `\ G/ /-/r oe"Cl[OSS.w/✓ /•• ., 'RT \ I.L.,.'D...I. /C Z-a-oar&wLVb,Fa;,•.., / 1-Z-T[wI DLO W-Drr ALaY or.O•%•O re al-e'OI.F. 1 L•CO.C.DL. (at.sr) /-a-CAP,Ma,X'.T /-I"CAI.M.I,set.' 1- ri GLIC.(T.SS LI) LSTL ro•b QJ . I 1-. LaT.tLc.E.0.r/Y I•r Trw/aLOWOIr A•LY ,_l"C.4O O 1E;,as.T �• - y "lr.e r a.r,Ll'•r 4 STA /0.54 • ti'J '�I lLir-Z'wT[L -ti-.M'TGE.Ml aFL,.a•RT IJ V /-a C.ai'TEE. •M. FL;MJ TMR mO1119T W3®11lVLi® C. wiC.wALL 10 LF e`0.1 I a1'fO1TIM1E11rIY.OLS MM 6 . Ie° ''I ai I-e"uo,nA,ae•eT MMI1fD R1e NltieUC,R ll • • . n. ¢-Z-at e•Loie.(T 55.F) r:•ti 5.n 2/Ie/67 I.r.•.A UL Ow ,. ...44.t .IH..Y.WM �� r.r.r.wwr....D p war.s� • ..wTa. --- o e-ems.r-L'ca.�D •i l -- r----- \ FIT EACH MCA Or DUc. L'_!v • UP LR iw..r i +J / O --- -- SECTION A-q fA o • r • I T i aa: i v.,. -. . a • a 3 d ara re3. irI ♦ I I� .vmi:/.a.r....tsr LEA t s=D•co..'~ ,J s . N ZO fl' 3�, Iq I.+c...rl..acco EMT, rrri o.ta5r `2 pu,.anl,T.r Z J I- �� O W Q a 3 !� nFM7 �� III o SECT C9 Fr• p, �r 6I R`3 :i';1 -- Ald� Twos.... oi-a! `Li o1Z4 DETA11 B DETAIL C W QI }t7�3 KM t‘ciicAft i - I - ,t z.An Z C�Z • :'v::n[ I . TOI ti.. W O 1, eat to•la.n —T_ rJ�[I` / Gto.bl n f •-IV•rwr-Ta. Jl.� l A oe !• 1�../ 1-4.p • Z L, '�"" ,10 c"�<Iw> -�--/ n`�"`(I+JCALL IE NOUN T N J T,PHD R M D I Sort-A.II CCU/L/�.C�M.I Il A I US<O.ACJ...WALE ROOdrG a/a>r..l ,�r 1- ca. �••K� .`.t':.'o�i.'.lv....1E.r+.r......n.�.c YOU DIG eT F.'Ira • FY't:ao a-zrBe i c of vcrwevs Lea r•• 1-800424.5555 C',•:�w v=r.S DE UL A �. 861,A DM -- --' - -- -' -- ,•:e'as .vMo/[o eY OrECTO.s N.:•,...,..rs ...... 5 Of 9 .- Lt —• _ _.. 3„ - .- - Kt99 •- ���;• SSSSIZTOOK ' S67Zq 3110H ' ,� 910 nu 3�O Y.....SWUM WY.•MISC s.n.11a•w1l•10 •It . • .� .-• �.�p SUOOH It 11Y] QM. lV[ 1.3y' =MISS W W.1.MINT.YwAY wiSn�i D�ln WV •m O..•W.W.s[i.,0 MO... �_� a lain p1.1.lA.S.W MIAOW TT.. M. W •t[ W ls ii assOISs D .9s �b:vTllO3 C..Tli:laati•••0n::I. 1. , (� - 5 O..an ants...• n I ...V w ) ZI n 'AIM•- aa.1,u0] lsaTM.m t'inallo a a=°sar°o aRS.Vf i z - D w[SSm.nOw MIS�Ja1.1140 MA sun m MO •Tt t z• Z i,O = 0101 we. aaa n••0.11.420 n Ti•.M.MI ulin sun,in •u Z .�. m m 11®a u I:.t1000 0 ns,W: ..,{ I[/1 N Yt•nu W.a Ad.NOY .Mw••• Mg. . um 'IT D n pp¢ -ma S i oo TIan CS18 O.1 T. s.BOA d 1104. 0'n I Z Ill < • ..•...1......••••.3• MO a. - .1•••••.1•asao�...10 DinMiwm1 Mi nailou • i Y Zr 1 m n.1L7•• w.nO.M'1 1..1.AJ. a rin.l n.n mai.. ..W. OMIT.aOW OY ••1G) !D (��.�. .1.sv II+- ..ram•• n•a•01 11.. i ni 1 mi S.M.af..a o. T^n.m a[mf AO�.n. AlSS n.°.rn rw+• •LS • Z N < vavw M1+� (�)•...1•.M1' MS.M•awMJu a1i=_n W•nM.01 m 0,em •.(1i.iM.D a Z c •'1 I •�^•s Imo• .• • r'• u0.110.01.0...77.1r.,auu...I nn.SSO n n 4 u1.n•Wrn. 000 aw an ne A.M. i �' / .1Jw.Y11 a 1M_w.1.Y W •.1..O•Y1..01 .l.f.Y wa •-W M O Lant.l..w1 W w TRY.u •Yi • J51›.3 `� ▪au m.11 nau.MIT:°."1•: iva,.va°T- • -sr 7T- �T '•� n MAIM dO..CM W 010.J T110. 7.10•[Y •11 =...a...M•.,Rw.na...•n.rLT....�Y[TaY. ] • '� f umi]w 4 w[Ma..'SSIOto`1...=..s..o.n MA •Y• . .o.am T,.• .v. wan a.11.11 •fT 1 Tr:� .I �, I al. ,.,. •w1.,4.SS,3., il_.1...MA..Y.a .W.Mn. tl 1rf'l tl ; tE -r..'14`:.: w • -'`tom•• ` 1▪1.11 .M1.M..,.:Mt°}f..11n:I:T=�.V.V. •It 11.1. �a .4 = a.T4.la . TIT. .{OWM00 •0=,fY •.l f .1• :m a ..0. .•1 n130n0 0.0,.•.]w TN. • ! R ; [it•.w1.f0u..•0•.11 W •n [OW w.w.i..Tf.Y1M L 1 ^�" I wa°Tlu wa un•.m...mw.w�...wt OMIT• _• IM •SSi].MI.s� Yn l .Y MdMO .....Yf•.0.90...31........11012...........S4.......1.10.•an { w• -� • WM MACH On MIMI4 ,•i.aJ.. 10a•SSL]• .001 waa. 0111 10.1w 0 0 0 f•II I •-s a10.LL •MOAT MI• 00. 0 Y n Maw wYli 3 mwo4 •wOa .. . 4n•lwla.l r..Y••.e..aY•.•w•MAtM.tun•l W.14•..=MMa 0112 '.7•W. T.•n O= 's..71.4•11aM. ". W.W1......Tnm..a....TI.•Tnm.. •TL • an T. =S1f1wt n ITT.a..wl. 1W170. •rl {11 i 00. OAW••040/ 0. 00014 114 •O-•Ta •M•1.M,. i.0• ..1. Y=OO ' 1.11J•O• M•1.11.•1T1.1 Y 0..u..1Y nn.M1w Y1.JM..� •.rcY• J.J 1Y..Mm W •[T •M .°1.�n4 101]n3M0a •Ii =.1.14. •Mfaw• wmia.TY y1.0.0• •st Oi 901 •..n nal)aw 1 •I..a=•[aSS 3171SS .11.. Y010 w1u,0•n Tlwa lM MM. anal.. 'II ..1•.w w•. .�•.•...w .1110.1. CanSISSWiwOb.•1S r..Tn.ai 71M Suiwli1J.n..,.Mwa.M°I...r. W w.,. D 1f[v.mi. '17.0 . •n 0.•iwp a .la .WO•=111 n.117.• w.na... ..T 1/w1 •AO Mg O.MM•ww•W•O.MIMI.w III •� •. r f S0t31i[a[a. +ri * WaY 1r..O.a 1wow..r.�.: ( .rr+1 1. MIIMI 0.1101110..I• 1°11.w•..•17,•W a 1 a0 w •••uia .IMAM ....a Tr oM�v aMi R R itc r^*• ��.�� ---Ti-. •u °]a.aO•oa.0111 u.vtula=.w.m Tn 'if rc M ft{ •� n 7t•1•n.w11a•[a-tu uu•ma gnaw 1r.110. [ 1Y., M I....•.• • -- •t.....al•.0a M.. ,I• ••....01. .•011 0•ff••1•Y..•w.nJ=..•a•••M.10•0•w 10,. • [ .1I a. •.T 'MM....." .a.Y.. ....1n.....w=.a : ,3 w.rs -- ��� .I NM..2.i as of a au a•ni1•.wa•l.w 1 r1 'u• • n+M en..Y..w.•n[T1•. •w..Y]al Yu •. •• anlinM° 1N'K7AP1a l0'Otl31v'ID79�VMl n10M'015� I• • 007 •.1 . oSS uwY,m.wLLT•.wI •. ^ •.iv,.M rn.1Ma Mai..• • ° • '.IJ]OWMm alanla MA.tY LL MA .Y nala[R_T n T•wt a...ia=• 1 ,i O.Y • .1 -r .'--�-•o . 11•nab.MA 1J111.IM1•=l.1.10J]•4;m•4.1171.. •. •MIT]0 '01 1nM r•. �� •1n•1s1 j I IL I' C 1���..�r• r\`;: r._v,•,1a '. i.-. -«____I __, !-r L 1�. '.11a114..] awJf 4. =.i°0..w 771111 ry•Y0 fY w TI.n MI 11•. MMOY YY wi®• •{ ` t1r.1.Iw 171- 1.14..w•.004.1.,u°.•00110.WIN • •L • 3 M oi.•ao LAID • •[•i•iawalillu�AO • . <_ •��� r = awl3Nw n•102.1...ni.L 11100* ..• •.wN'•a•.].]n T,•.•.[•4.Ot •T. •r . r O \ MI SOa111n1.10 =.W.,0• •TOM SK •uw IT. .• wta]•a•Oa i10t3 na1M 4•.011 11.:w°.MOM.w 1.i ••••• • r. TI - =O a L.iYl1T `� 017.niw •I '06110 WI1 0 a1 7771.... 771 Yu 0. Y Y an1101�a00.Of rl,•.T1..a i[r.i.ITI.1 M[.t0 000 •f I • \ MONISM 03•n1. T AO'1••NtY•f•l•i�..T••.„7•��••uM]1[ t N a . ...Alt, ISM•Y•Y[w MA OTT.. i0011.•n1 WM JO r T. •f ,T![TIl•O.•IO•]1•.•MI MP.Pt a .�t0...1130 2. Y1.11 .u,11.I.M00.a •10a].1•w• T•n e P= ^J .•171 nlO.L•nIMM•. 11•1•m.•.111].4.ufl an..a t•1.001.41.03. i Imo, �.I ° ,�.� t0,3.100ISSw •n S..• MO 02 O.L•rt 1•Ia10 •1 TlI•.ILTa1ai1 •wl4i]0MA•1m=SSS.3.Ot Y u••nM _ Ly y`�r1```` n01 . 0•0111 . v 1 1..N .1.1.0..•I Cm,.°w TI.1a favor n01.1•.=]1.1a ....a 1T.0. I.x•ionn..0.1.11.0. .L • O �q u w.M.OY J.011004.1.a1MA1 SSIC[....].• 4 soma.1.14 1. 1•ISS• .:7T1.iI 'M01110LL1Mw•7•aai 4,01•J Ynw4• , N= -• .� q.a'•. li- in•n rw aI 011w 10•In,O MO=14020•.In•130iI Ia•af a TIME Otaw Maw VI•w1•...a.,.1.00200lY �_ �►`� �.-......•.c.a.�...�..-.-� •oct im]I bni1 SS•••a •wn ana• MA.w[uiiriii •. •WO aa••. a1...auio • \ 00 14•.n=r0u.]O as.•w=•100 01 .• `^ "1�_�\9`�� �•••�� •1 I 71R1a•• sa.m 4 fAxn..o rnan 0la.].0.,Tw.a1 YI 01 n06.2 •anor T]Imaa1 10 ra-uY ar Oi.alto[.n• L..0 .an i...0 .•.•11°101 11 . .u•a01 TIT •[ .`. (0y \ - A' 0▪1•14 MA..ra-•-r1•••IS.o.0000.77•=i.•m Y i•n 1 =1n•0m..0m A ......... Tli O11Y11I7 rciMO•JMia•[t tma .....1T •f Oi•0. r•r a10•a.N 11... rr l•Y[w w SS=a AM LL1113T `��4. -___ •w ^-___� _.__- • .r..A ___ •O • In 0.1w�•. • • :O1•.•Y[Y 1.1.1 1 .11•a01.0 . wMO l race l•[aI1I�^•1 {I4. ••uul n.ain•7n .M nm Ma•• .... ` �• - - `'••;`� SO I:I�oan.. Ya�a1•i:.,,... ,C•3 Yi a1 112.171.AL".'Itm/.IS•YIYI=. .[ _ _ .r ` ' �' -'-- q•ow'- - - .F•.. [ ....[i0.4.,••,•=•.ix3111a0.011.....JO... I. .[ Wr'=! rLL n0 w l 77w• 1.Ll.MAi. ;l'' y .� =s ..`\ ;;;i IS On mnonSS OMIT W JO MISS=1niTl lLL•.OS3.a211=M. MIJO1i..0 an30Oxa 1.1.4.',Y�4.°uua0n. OM _^�� il urn..1011 JO uD m O 1.11014...°C.Sa..0nlaf •]17.0a 1••1.1•CY 10. •M013001.00 nand• 0011111.1200 ■ .SS M.I•laa .410 MI.1..............n0a 11. •I •air •apwl0aa• •x a1 T•1• S.......OD T• •T . V• 1 a • 1 Is 35 • malt anLLrt.8•1I tu•.Y1101.a01 i.SLY]Lfa t.at/Mao ( MOM.Jlp as • F - ,._ _ . . . .- u� COMMENTS: a�c � ", „ • I: WitAd ' LZ • -fie 13 , e , h.a�— a-r ..PTV � ��' � �— u g. . ..k-Act...4„ a...d...elt,t_et.12-. li-i.A..\=4.t....idtir of- ±,14...-e utxei-totAiteCt-- ftzrretio-eeLAAA., eue.c.etAv r,,,,A.,..A....9,_ 7 oyN2-,-- We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Atk _M G____ Signatu a of Director or Authorized Representative Dat Rev. 6/88 . Arrni"-AA 'ilk-tin/U-0U tt) e--CrYtaWt-L43-14--e-04- lArn. • -% e• Svc - c r 11 1 1 c 1/3-G ,tom,( -rAt-._ cvlk ' _ Off`, e oe AVCA4-0--49--e--6--011 ac. .at. fAtA--A-arrLz-0 1:)r-C,-=e4",t7A,turtn 1i\-a.-4-7 -max --t.r A-t. . le- 4-kr- otem--c---e-fr W-TrYle--= W--4-i-k--. i4e-klib - .e.-/--7 --f`Y vim---f-, -ti,t_e_ -etAc�. n't;'-'1=- am47oY Ye—Ad ..-1-l4-e . 7 1 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: -My-.e-- 9"0.t 6Y1 APPROVED V APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire partment access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes No Fee �eeel - Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of /00e fa Asa o ( is required. 4 _.____'___hydrants with a minimum flow of /0640 gpm each is required. Fo,e ,6fc c s• At`' / 4- feet of the structure Primary hydrant is required to be within is .A :. Secondary hydrants are required to be within 300 ' feet of the .... structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system s stem is required to protect the total structure. Yes No_ All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes.No No All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes V4 &-t- ---- DATE �i�. 9�4 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 ;(iTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISIONBE OFP THE COMMUNITYCO IN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 12 1988. I � -------------------------------- REV WING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: RTMENT/DIVISION:__Y i�L APPROVED ___APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • / _.-- - Z 4- - SIGNATUR OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE ` ` 7` '/ REV. 6/88 • • • REVIEWING' DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 0774/7-y APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED ,11r ns col s'a Pins) :f, [UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT 101 {':" LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-WATER A/0 �z �l!!3E COMERS AGREEMENT-SEWER ,DES G-32 To, .0.E-►/F'.4-. fed 8� `r�7� — i A-07,11 CLVELOPidENT CHARGE-WATER VZ = �142¢.' 04/. 0. -x 43s1���4- '/�42¢. pD _.,. °", ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-WATER �d 8q8. O0 5 Gl C C,Qq, !_ ...- '1.ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER �p �� ill i , ;;ED WATER MAR vKs - o i�k s wa —� I Ty; Hitt J.Srtw+nt et-Ami To Wtr ci,, ir: `. ,.5VED SEWER M,M� it, w-881 an.rt Izrc4o. i:C.."OVED API HYDRANT LOCATIONS N� gulu9/rY� Wc�c7 ,i MI E-DkRT. . 'YG)5 ' ' I i�..FLGW AN YSIS NU w ti5_,_, --- .2,-________ . • SIGNATURE OF ERECTOR OR AUTHORIZEDDATE V A77 REPRESENT ATIVE REV. 6/88 7-27-Fraiii4 . ti1•4Eddie, A L/4-7-4j , .2L���s O u �G�9.zyrr J���.r. a /t,.vf PijOr-e..— e.o2s� '. We have reviewed this application with particular which we have experti e and have identified areas oftproba an eo those areas ble where additio al inf mation is needed to properly assess thisi p oposar are posal. Signat re of Director or Authorized Representative Da REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVIL„N: 47,-4Ef APPROVED _APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • 5 #)c'J 4eC{ Co ,i 1-C odA--r l ut d u U-C // a K L G/C r- / �21wC11 o e f Re Lrew:1- fpcte be- �,��. a•�l�- Z �.i Y 3 ., Rtb c ,r_ 'NA e_ Fr; pod . • L h F.° G a-s,4 e c, d S I GNATU F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE �/Z Si-LJ ! for aeq.,-f- C cue/(Jo wte ft,. Ike are, REV,' 6/88 0 Cleje +6 a- qe'- I'r�r/e•-.. ei u-'%/ rans'1GG-Re.;r7sz %,— Molder REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED X /AePPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 67/ oao44 47 x /7. '7 -- M5.9 ocie o-0 gtd 5 x /7. 7 z•7 enact' r97 fry .5/47 a g€•6 C/`I 7)� // YS7. 2 41 cv , pl Af 7 lam ri/644 G� ✓•.� . SIGNATURE F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVEDATE �117/��' t� REV. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: E' APPROVED Vr APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED r"e.r c 1 tL / "� r,, ri %�" �i 5 !%, • • AA0colij.1 SIGNATURE of nTnrrmno nn DATE 7/?7/'�.a' NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) , upon a remand from the Renton Hearing Examiner, has revised the conditions of the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated previously issued for the following project: RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES - NACHES CENTER ECF-056-88, SA-056-88, SM-056-88 Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three buildings; a 3 story office building of 67, 000 sq.ft. , and 2 one-story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft. and 23 , 000 sq. ft. , respectively. The property is located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue SW. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 p.m. on November 21, 1988. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An. appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. Published: November 7, 1988 N OT C E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-056-88, SA-056-88, SM-056-88 APPLICANT RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES - NACHES CENTER (AMENDED) PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF THREE BUILDINGS; A 3 STORY OFFICE BUILDING OF 67, 000 SQ.FT. , AND 2 ONE-STORY OFFICE/R&D BUILDINGS WITH 28 , 000 SQ.FT. AND 23 , 000 SQ.FT. , RESPECTIVELY. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE 600 BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE SW. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES k DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL MI WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH IIIETEMTRN klRING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. • • . OTICE' ".: ENVIRONMENTAL • DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-056-88, SA-056-88, SM-056-88 • APPLICANT RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES - NACHES CENTER (AMENDED) PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF THREE BUILDINGS; A 3 STORY OFFICE BUILDING OF 67,000 SQ.FT. , AND 2 ONE-STORY OFFICE/R&D BUILDINGS WITH 28,000 SQ.FT. AND 23,000 SQ.FT. , RESPECTIVELY. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE 600 BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE SW. • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES k DOES NOT • HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT • BE REQUIRED, THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. • COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH TIETTEMTRN kIMRING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. . DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. CERTIFICATION I , 4, EP f 9 'F . LII D , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1Il (, COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN '}-( r ) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON ik5O\) , 4) IC38 . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington • residing in L on the �, SIGNED day of e-P_p_AZ 4$ 0 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division MEMORANDUM PINING DIVISION CI Y OF RENTON D NOV 21988 DATE: November 1, 1988 nn TO: Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator FROM: John R. Adamson, Program Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Trip Fee for Grady Way Transportation Benefit Area This memo will confirm the discussion you, Gary A. Norris, Traffic Engineer, and I had this morning concerning the trip fee for the Grady Way Benefit Area. The Grady Way Corridor Transportation Improvement Study was completed on July 5, 1988. This study has been presented to the City Council. Action is presently pending before the Transportation Committee of the Council. The Study discusses some projects that have already been financed and/or completed using other resources. For that reason it is the current opinion of the Traffic Engineering Staff that the appropriate trip fee will be in the $65-70 range. Our recommendation of the specific amount will be presented to the City Council Transportation Committee within the next month. Please call me if I can be of any further assistance. P49 ohn R. Adamson cc: Gary A. Norris, Traffic Engineer 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 ei C CITY OF RENTON `�.os22. r i . = POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT c,- T 7 ® ---- l°s r 6 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 �r� � a 2 � AS�' ebb %_ � �®5��+�� i o -- -11iddressee LY1hnoivn ----, CF CHG Associ ates inSUrTr r': ., 200 S. 333rd Street Moved,1g s ' Federal Way, WA 98003 rr,°vei, rza�_.: No suc., si �________ i - - - - +] i ! it II 1 it P !ietei uieileiiiiee f sieiiesii F-------------,-- 1 '', .;i.:.,,, ..;: j. c 4 , 1:)-- -..4,_.-.4 -______:..........• ...".,,:, ./1! ir. co 4 . — ':`:61 -1, Alio; -„,. ', -(.-L-IV IS esi- p 1.1-.2? ,-.-' .1 . 4 . .4: " ,. . v. -, ' 4,,71/ s'v Illifit' ra.. : st_ ._ __Joiret,,,,, .. . . _ .,. 4.1, -. sortizo.,, !,. i :.. : .. .. .., ...* •-_,,. ,II 41,4%., ste ------- 1.114, 1 ... . ' ,' . .., . •.•I.., ..,\ I Y • oi i i • .I Iiiv if , , 11 ifi, , / ,.R—.3- . L--------------- 7 /1 * 'N \ if .1 QCf fr A. • Z Ito- so, -A . . .,,,,,,,,„ ,,,,....,,,,,--, -. , _, D' . . -. ' Er Off P \ , „.:: ,44,4 .'9, „,.....Fp.,..„.,c67-71: . ;--1 • . ..2 • , ,, ,.0/ i . I ' • .Y ■ 2 . *, . ----',..--, ...:. 1 -1" ,p , ,,,,,,..,;./. . . ,.__, :.. .• i , 1. ' ' 'e• 7 �t ', �Mr 4� le* i +�!��a`'�4��t!: �; : zr I .%-'': ..1.: i:. • cri v 40IPPAPi. ... " . .. .4$71,i10,51,447t.#$41,9; .. . 4ter: . "A6 '4;41814 r#100.A. . FP uD 037.1"' ssi �' "P' 4 I' '' . . g w T,'' — - -- - - • • 4 Via ' . , L - -. • GM ip1 ''''':%. N\. \ - u, ; mi..... 0 ° \Z ... • :II I I �� NACHES CENTER . . , SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-056-88 . . . . .. . • _. , , . • .. . . . . . APPLICANT RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA + 10 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS NACHES AVENUE S.W. & POWELL AVENUE S.W. • ' EXISTING ZONING 0-P, OFFICE PARK • EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED • PROPOSED USE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF THREE (3) OFFICE BUILDINGS. . . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION. COMMENTS LOCATED AT THE 600' BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE S.W. \ \ F\ \ VICINITY MAP OF ADJACENT USES EXTENSON OF• •:-.... 'IL s‘,UNADOPTED WETLAND : • - • •- -),... .1. , 13 ;:.;-.4:::". i..,..at..1^4:,..1W. '.-5.''.°%x., ,,,70.,..::;;,,J7,2v_.A.44. . ,7"''''..--'........17,55::'50..q...'':A0: 19,-''''''--..:M'7:7-• 9._ .. e- ..t.i. r..,..„,....,__!....,........„_,........,.....:. . .... ._ ....1=- ,...T.-.......„. .,. ..........„..?„,.__,..",-.2.....,...‹...., - s' !",.1...rti.,......, =.4.'''441-43441.10,:..A AREA WITHIN - -•..-3.• ,•,...-.... f:oOYDITAM;08.3 .5 • 100 YEAR FLOODPLAM TABULATION SITE AREA BUILDING AREA s435,600 S.F. z118,000 S.F BUILDING FOOTPRINT s71,398 S.F. COVERAGE SITE COVERAGE PARKING STANDARD COMPACT HANDICAP TOTAL VICINITY MAP s27% s16% .322 STALLS .217 STALLS(MISTS) IR STALLS .587 STALLS IMO SS.BASED ON 51.2%EFF1ZIENCY . - ..7 1 CO • - !di . '.1 I:1, Vaiiiiiiiiir '.- ' . ,,,•• < \ \ _ ,. p,4.itimar.:•:::-. • fi „ _ `'"e• '''' . ss 1. AL tIF•fk,'' i4,. • l 'i_T-L-T- r .. • • \4•:, t,.z tt,-....... ..- - NORTH SCALE iS IVEDENIE .,f 11.1 2 • . \ •, •J r iM...,..1. !. /4 E ••••Joyr•-7....mA7 - 5 4 1 •-•411: '' \ I , I... 0 I p.-® UNADOPTED . \\--\.. = A. • OZ .L8-so9-8•85,8,- V.`1.4.-P:7;:agi"..'- • ../ •, n r-/ WETLAND \ •• ‘. /IN' \\\AX\\\ .. .,,..,5.•• _______._____-_. — ) r gRiEW TO 0 th...7:RATE 6 'l . ''' ' O . Liii Z b- ---- --e\\® •• ,'.\ , ' ,. ..., ,8- ASPOR7 9•81.5 0 ' 0. ....'. : CI) ' ••••••:4*.j. 1) 1 C.-- '-'7--2: -.---7._ ---7-4-1;a3--•oo,ma; ••••• •- ' 1 % A1 SW 15.00.•350.00------ ____ -- ---•.4 ... L.NA,.C....”-T/N,OD '-'-',....... .00111 i• I IOSPITAL (..) (1) 0— '• .t: . _ a- ..- ...- /-,.._.,..... I017031/• ...L.9 ? < T ••' .. Z I. CE ND ^ \7:\I \ D !//V 4 1 Z•%"o \_____ 1 :‘1::! , 1 ,=.' 1 ' IR 1 r 1 •''' o t tl = -Al L•P'' ' , _14-, --- ,'ti I!sin la!.._-t-1:7--,.—-H ,„f„P.,\,. -;,..t.,....rz II i Iti ;.i ..t‘i!t,:-..-_ .._. . „w,-i k 1 • •••,.. ..1,-,..., /t.......-••- ....,-.....-:*,..„,,.... ... / 17.1.L01,..N....17 , .: -1:2'-A'••Le-i'tl- ' 44i--141,it ///7,-..- '•------ A- --:_"'V,,,,*--- -- L, '---- ) / .-..,7-74.-00 LEG E r..,..,...__•TREES To BE REMOVED •TREES TO BE PRESERVED •PAM IAGINTS GIB BICYCLE RACK IS 130C11 41:41X1'' .." 41-s---::--7*-41'---:::-. \--G------849L4v-1.-------- ---- - •- . I.. I JAI.t ;4,' •:--'" .I. 2 _ ,...... :, --,-NA4 0 EXISTVIG FIRE HYDRANT ' .441 '..-." -.•-•••••• -7 kn 8....... • .ki .4 1 . ' ...... . , - ..4. '''- I I . 'I . gli ---- •- - .s.959 - -----'------. ----4••••=-.7F-'7---- I I X. .„.,..„I WI Mr.;t..1%.: _J-17 d-7-7--1- , , \\___-__-..,___,, ,,,.. 1._ ...._ _ „_. __,...• „:„..„.„.,:_,„ • , „ .,,,, , ,,,,..•,.,..„ ,,,_:„.____,_ • ,,, __ \--,.... --------_, •••• • •• ,, • • • 12 11••••'..... .4 1111 .,, -- Ilit,! ,,;;,;; . , ,\I . ., 1 .,..,_,.,, .___ „,,....., . --...... . • . /./ -.. ,--- ;.. 1 ....,,,,...“, r17-,- !....-,-,....,-..., --,-.Y;".::-'..1"-'..'..--- .1', ...,1 ------ ...._._---- --,.... • .7 " // i s..35 t. •''' /` ------- :::,7 '— ' '-;•.:-T.:;5---/------ - ------',.- ----i" -- • fillEZI I'I I I I 4 I I I ._I .:, • '-'.4..'-'-'-'7'-g'-''''''''-`Z---s• ;,- ,.:,. . ' ..,...",(_,------------ •-•a A,,,,, Jr,c-----..... ...--..,.....\ , _.„-;:,,.:_-,..--ar.-.• . -.-„,...., - ._...._4 r _, ,2.,,_____.,_ 1 ,- .. _____ I r ------------- -- ----- __------,,_.-•:-; sr- --------- .7, •,-,f4s.- _-LL_='-_-ri-, il-oW-Cas_Cttr. ...•-••-s ._,-„, --.,r. ..-.!..-,- __:---,i,.:----,--_--- - ",,,z,,,...• i.... .,,...,7i .,-7---_-,--.-"n"-..._ "7"TrarlEISITIMEA"-"'""""'"'7?"'"•-•""'"''" r-----'"'------ /7- I 6 ' ..' \---?:::,--::-",":,.: :::•:;:-?;:.-.i?..;.-,-11 ;'‘,,,,„.....,:a'-...--,_, %,._.."...-:-.---7-f;i-, ...„,.,,.._ ' •.= 1 p r-N---) 2i-l-cc :,-, i___n ...,1 . N \----k-•- - --=•---- _ - P‘ 1 • , -,..- -..,•-•., iii_ . ]fl _ E.„.„..,.,,.„..5 ...,,, XISTING DRAPIAGE SWALE-/ y'.:. \-.7..:.;'!....5;;7'4;8.•/.0,,,..,,, ,......_...,.. „.....,,,....,.,_, ,......,........,__,..„,..„...,,,....„...„, ,,,,.......,..,.,.,.,„,..„ uj4;, , _.....,,,,,_ .,,..„._gz ACCESS MAINTENANCE EASEMENT L.. ,,•-,NDEXX,XPX.,-,...,....., I ,O. ,.' .... 1 11 89-70•25.W 61.5T ,_ • I EXISTIMG 20•EASEMEMT LIME I 358 PAELME&TRANSPORTA OF OE AND GAS EASEMENT 8A159,.•MAW-1E ...,.1. 1-7 - CI 77" • S8ALE L J 4. ID • 1 -7, II 4,NI.X,J.A.C. NO.DESCIMPTION OATE I Yr........0,..1-,.....•17.I-e., ENIA/NAGE SWALE EXISTING BUILDING 1-11.' t 1 _ EXISTING 701110::::: LXISTWG BUILDING i !I I i=d1M.11.' PROPOSED GRADE EXISTTIG GRADE MI i ., Ng ., jjjjjjj SITE SECTION A vs°. o o. 1. NACHES CENTER .11 /\ ..._.„.,- fl - SCHUMAN C-OMPANIES o 1„ 1,„ „0 I „,.,,,I,.....2::P., RENTON.WASHINGTON _ • . _ ...... .' tzt: SITE PLAN --.. - • 1 --1 SITE PLAN I '. , 43 JOB N0,88018 slim NO OF 0 1 of 9 f• DATE .L-3-PN . CNECX M.. •7 PLANT MATERMLL LEGEND LU LU LLJ 41 kw. Tpw al -a EX MAN SWA PC &TRA�M'AT— DATE NO DESCRWMN LEGEND The NACHES CENTER LANDSCAPE PLAN NtcheH THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES Nelson bn Group - RENTON,WASHINGTON Incorpomted @ OEM LANDSCAPE PLAN ^~ ~~~ 7m� � si 120 y Iy 310' J, 45' 12e' y I—�—ll I W i Z CC CL BLDG.2 WEST ELEVATION BLDG.2 SOUTH ELEVATION W O ~ 310' , 120' r Z U z r 145' I 90 I Q TT^ �I _ 1-__ Cl)V Q a• W U BLDG.2 NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.2 EAST ELEVATION N BUILDING 2 Q W 1-7 Painted Tilt Up Concrete Panel Tinted Glass —Reflective Glass o', 128' 270'- / .0 1 • • µ_20_y I 68' 1 7 whimor.1111F.Pm r b ,„t:rcrl--.4-TF--"----. '711. 1 j: _=ultimo /21,a I ill i—I I -- '' NO GESCAS TEIN -GATE BLDG. 3 WEST ELEVATION Entry(typ.)J BLDG.3 SOUTH ELEVATION _ 5 y_ sz':' 5 1 ' rrr- _ , I • I I17477.11: I�IR II Ins -', N ��� ,- 11 111 1 r I- 14 111II;HA,r Jr l P Pi i -j- f BLDG.3 NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.3 EAST ELEVATION BUILDING 3 • -" NACHES CENTER { NS I THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES BLDGS.ELEVATIO 2&3 RENTON,WASHINGTON lt ELEVATIONS BLDGS.2&3 ur •[ JOG NO.0801. a- .'. OITE .4-te-00EM'.GNNNN,�.�. CHECK.PAG. I s �� cn p • 137'-2' j. 224'-10' / Z P 77'-9' 59'-5' / 77'-9' 1 69'-6' f L 77 9' A Brick Panel Mechanical Screen —Concrete Panel Tinted Glass W 2 1 I Z U rTh 11i111I11I1I1111111�1/i■■►I■■\®®®a �9, �� (- _ _ W Z �iIIIII����IIIIIII���Iiii■■■■■■■iiosla q (E.) Q 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIAMEN EIrum IA- ■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■e;ii■■■■■l0■■0■ ■ ■u■� ■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ ■ I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII■■■MIMM 1© r 1 i I '' ' W = Reflective Glass— 1-- U Main Entry = z 0 N o s BLDG.1 EAST ELEVATION BLDG.1 SOUTH ELEVATION Z - 1 LLI � 224•-10' /_ a 137-2' 1' 4 59'-5' / 59'-0 r - 53-0' J. 59'-5' I / 77'-9' o ' 4j, ... NO DESCNIPTDEn-a.•..a..N DATE i oe.-.e..-bee 1 ;: 1 r — T I %_�—� Imo,r�� \ m II ' --- — I � r /;:t_±,:ilT:- - .,, \,..,_ __, 1 Secondary Entry— Secondary Entry—' LBLDG.1 NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.1 WEST ELEVATION • NACHES CENTER ""° THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES<cam BLDG.ELEVATIONS I A . RENTON,WASHINGTON Woo v...otpcosn.Do ELEVATIONS BLDG.1 + JOB NO.08014 y OET NO OE- -_- - - - - - - __ -- - - - - --- -— DATEae.EB -- _ - - - -- - DRAWN•C.'" 8 of 4 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9: 00 AM, NOVEMBER 1, 1988 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES - NACHES CENTER Appeal of specific conditions of a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated issued by the Environmental Review Committee for an office/research and development complex known as Naches Center, Ref. file SA-056-88. Property located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue SW. (ECF;SA;SM-056-88) AAD-105-88 ti • • RNt'J! i@PUBNLICC •RI _ I TONyHEARI �,EXAMIN°R RENT,ON INASHWGTON; A publicftieanngiwill be hel by the AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Renton HeatIngEx`amme�;Iat�,tii'sAregular meeting it I Council Chaifil rs on the second floor•of,City Hall,;;RentorikWashing- Audrey Benner ton, on November 1';1988;gatAU�;'a.m.to ,being first duly sworn on oath states consider the following petitionst that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the RIVERTECH ASSOCIATESx.:j • Appeal of-specrfipoonditik•ofOaier-y mination,•of:Non IVlitigated issued,-by'the:;Ehvironmentalp'Rey VALLEY DAILY NEWS committee Jot an,.office/tesearoh and development :complex.:,.,known as • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Naches Center,;,Ref., file.'SA=056-88. Property located'in the:a690,ailock of Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers Naches Avenue S.w.„,;:✓ ; are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Legal descriptiofre.Renton or noisy above are,omfile ir.the..Reriton,jCommunit months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published Development Department.'.. in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King All interested persons,toisad Petitions Count Washington.The ValleyDailyNews has been approved as ale al are invitedN te'ti er 1, 1980, ie,9pu9lic hear- t, g PP g in omNovember 1,'19se, at900�a.m. to r • newspaper order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for express their by P g County. 'Published'in the Valley Daily News'7Octo=f Kin g ber21,1988.G©i&#51'067 t v The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition _ , Renton Edition x , Auburn Edition , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a _ Notice of Public ;.scaring was published on October 21, 1988 R5127 ' The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 18 .2 4 • • Subscribed and"sworn to before me this 2 8 t ltlay of Oct 19.E • • Notary P blic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON November 1, 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES Appeal of specific conditions of a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated issued by the Environmental Review Committee for an office/research and development complex known as Naches Center, Ref. file SA-056-88. Property located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue S.W. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 1, 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: OCTOBER 21, 1988 .� CITY OF RENTON 4$ 0 Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney "LL Daniel Kellogg -Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean - Zanetta L. Fontes - Robert L. Sewell - Mary deVuono, Assistant City Attorneys RECEIVED October 27, 1988 OCT 1 1988 RENTON TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner CITY HEARINGOF EXAMINER FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Appeal of Rivertech Associates Scheduled November 1, 1988 SA ^ • /�Ff' Dear Mr. Kaufman: This letter is to confirm the fact that the city and a representative of Rivertech have agreed to a remand of this matter back to the Environmental Review Committee for clarification of the conditions of the Declaration of Non-Significance with conditions . There will be a subsequent appeal period, with a strong possibility that the applicant will not appeal the follow- up conditions . I have been authorized by Charles Blumenfeld to communicate this agreement to you. Should you have any questions please let me know. Lawrence J. Women LJW:as . cc: Mayor & Charles Blumenfeld A8 . 33 :53 . PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON OCT 3 l 1988 11, Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 • 0 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION October 25, 1988 Mr. David Schuman The Schuman Company Bldg. 3, Suite 219 16300 Christianson Road Seattle, WA 98188 RE: Rivertech Associates - Naches Center - Appeal (ECF; SA; SM-056-88) AAD-105-88 Dear Mr. Schuman: A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for November 1, 1988. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. • ly, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp (Copies to Parties of Record listed on Page 2) • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Rivertech Associates - Naches Center Notice of Public Hearing October 25, 1988 Page 2 cc: Mr. Robert Sieh Edwards & Barbieri Attorneys At Law 6501 Columbia Center 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Mary M. Anderson 13618 SE 180th Renton, WA 98058 Muckleshoot Tribal Council c/o Morgan Bradley 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98002 JA • z 90 �o Imm � o1TF0 SEPj *OAP . • City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner • will hold a • , • PUBLIC HEARING . .... in • CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON NOVEMBER 1, 1988 BEGINNING AT 9 • 00 A.M. P.M. 3 AAD-105-88 (ECF;SA;SM-56-88) CDNCERNINCam: RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES-NACHES CENTER APPEAL OF SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF A DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ISSUED BY THE ENVIRONEMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR AN OFFICE/RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COMPLEX KNOWN AS NACHES CENTER, REF. FILE SA-056-88. -------- - ,,C(I ::: :.,..v, /.0?"/./44.z . ..ii.'.:. 31 Nil --:-.LU .[II r i'. --,, :;:‘, •,, ..z Iwy4 - 0_ ... -:-:1 Itz :-:,-.• fili,,,I,9,8 m P 101 ii7id - '' • '' '/WRIT. . .J1 03,,,,, ,.. ..- „..,,;,,„:„. .,....., Al • . ...:, :•:. ••:.„ ,.,..._ ..... • ,•, .:qo „,,,_ v , /7„)„..„ •,..q.k , i ly --- .1'-'i., 'lit!, .„! \ ---„,- . �: � qq.c��- t y • N �. tirr lJJ �" gG 5 11 .11i. .:tili.4.4%fiR1 .›.. I gbaCastiliPAIL%44""44 040 - . ,t61P-77' .1!7C) n 1L. ice, ' . .. • t;� �''• R-1 : • . . :,.. '�y o a M-' \* .....i.-.....Su.. et:15. ,;...s„. „ . —: ;31 w `` E O '•'r NERAL LOC ' T1b fV A /UR''. A D REBS: PROPERTY LOCATED AT .THE 600 BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE SW. r/1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON 'BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 • THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE . REMOVED. WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION :, . . �� BoG-iII1 8c, GATES LAN OFFICES The Bank of California Center Anchorage Seattle.WA 98164 Bellevue Portland )'lllfi)0825151 Tacoma Telex: 32-1087 Washington, U.C. CHARLES IL BLUMENFELI) I;ax: (20ui)02:3.4:3.2t3 Yakima 17356/44049 October 14, 1988 • HAND DELIVERED OCT 1 7 1988 r±� The Heari-g Examiner i Renton Pity Hall ��; � �� ll +1 200 M. 1 Avenue South Ren .n, WA 98055 Re: Rivertech Associates - Naches Center ECF-056-88 , SM-056-88 Notice of Appeal and Request for Hearing Dear Mr. Kaufman: We are writing as counsel for the Applicant in the above- referenced matter. The purpose of this letter is to appeal , and request a hearing on, the conditions outlined in the Environmental Review Committee ' s October 3 , 1988 and October 7 , 1988 letters . We are appealing pursuant to Sec. 4-2823 (A) 1 . (a) of the City Code (mitigation measures on the Declaration of Non-Significance) , and we are requesting a hearing pursuant to Secs. 4-738 (C) 2 . and 4-738 (K) of the City Code (conditions on Site Plan Agroval) . ( The mitigation measures/conditions at issue relate to the following general i,sues: (1) the heron rookery; (2) the adjacent wetland; (3) "traffic improvement costs" ; and (4) other issues . The Heron Rookery Paragraphs 3 and 5 relate to the heron rookery and impose time restrictions on activities within certain distances of the rookery. The first issue is an inconsistency between paragraphs 3 and 5 . Paragraph 3 provides that fill activity can occur only between January 23 and April 30 , while paragraph 5 provides that outdoor construction cannot occur between January 23 and July 31 . V \ ,- The Hearing Examiner October 14 , 1988 Page Two • In addition, paragraph 3 purports to address all fill activities on the Site, no matter how far from the rookery, while paragraph 5 limits the restrictions to activities within 1 , 200 feet of the rookery. In addition to the inconsistency noted above, we object to the general restrictions on the development of the property. It is important to recognize that the western portion of the Site is already filled (pursuant to a previous site plan approval and fill permits) . All fill activity to be conducted as part of this project is over 1 , 390 feet east of the heron rookery, and all building construction activity on the Site will be more than 920 feet from the rookery. Restrictions imposed in paragraphs 3 and 5 are unnecessary and not consistent with earlier positions taken by the Renton City Council and the City Planning Department. Specifically, on the property directly southwest of the Site, owned by First City Equities , the City Council imposed a temporal restriction only on fill activity at 600 feet extending to 1 , 000 feet (over the pond area) from the rookery -- directly adjacent to the Site the restriction is 600 feet. There is adequate existing natural vegetative screening between the rookery and this Site to support a similar 600-foot buffer. Although we do not believe that any restrictions beyond 600 feet are necessary, the Applicant has advised the City Planning Department that it would provide temporary screening, as described in paragraph 5 , in lieu of any restrictions on construction activity between January 23 and July 31. Wetlands Paragraph 16 imposes restrictions and obligations designed to protect a particular wetland identified in the unadopted City of Renton Wetland Study, dated February 1981. The Applicant agrees to a 50-foot setback from the low area of the existing wetland. However, the Applicant objects to the requirements of the paragraph because they are based on erroneous information and are beyond the authority of the City under both the City ' s Environmental Policy Ordinance and the Site Plan Review Process . First, the Environmental Review Committee assumes that Wetland E02/3 is on the Site. The study on which they rely was never adopted by the City and presents general location data; the Wetland ' s boundary is not described with precision. Aerial photographs , and the permitting history of the Site, indicate that the wetland never extended on to this Site. It is important to point out that even if the wetland had been filled by the previous owner of the Site, it was filled under permits validly issued by the City of Renton and pursuant to site plan approval . I3oc,L14 &GATES i The Hearing Examiner October 14 , 1988 page Three Second, this paragraph would require the Applicant to remove existing fill and restore wetland and buffer areas. This requirement is neither an appropriate mitigation measure under the Environmental Policy Ordinance, nor an appropriate condition under Site Plan Review. The fill is not part of the project at issue. The fill is an existing condition. The wetland is not on the Site nor on property owned by the applicant. There is simply no authority for the City to impose on the Applicant a requirement to remove fill to provide a wetland buffer. Traffic Improvement Costs Paragraph 9 imposes a $411 , 454 . 20 assessment as a "fair share of traffic improvement costs" for the "Grady Way Benefit Area. " Under the State Environment Policy Act and the City Environmental Policy Ordinance, conditions imposed as mitigation must be directly related to a documented adverse environmental impact specifically identified in a City Ordinance, plan or regulation adopted by the City Council . Similarly, there is no authority under the Site Plan Review provisions for the imposition of an assessment. We have not been able to locate any City ordinance, plan or regulation adopted by the City Council which sets forth the "fair share" program or formula, nor have we been able co locate an ordinance, plan or regulation adopted by the City Council which describes the "Grady Way Benefit Area" or imposes any requirements for improvements thereto. Other Issues Paragraph 6 needs clarification. We are not comfortable leaving total discretion to the City to determine "acceptable means" without more specificity. Paragraph 8 reduces parking to below the minimum provided in the Ordinance. The Applicant has provided the Code minimum 1/200 S.F. based on a 92% efficiency. This efficiency is the appropriate efficiency for office. All three buildings will be for office. The City' s 85% efficiency is based on industrial development, rather than office. Therefore, the reduction proposed in paragraph 8 is not required by the Code and should be eliminated. Paragraph 11 imposes additional passive recreation areas. The Applicant has already provided the following passive recreation areas : picnic and horseshoe court to the east; trail network along the south property line; and in addition, a series of benches between buildings and at entryways , and we submit that this is sufficient. BOG L &,GATES The Hearing Examiner October 14, .1988 Page Four Paragraph 12 is not clear. The Applicant is happy to work with the City staff to encourage and assist with the trail system. The Applicant, as part of its development, is providing a jogging trail ; however, we do not believe it is appropriate or necessary to provide an easement for such a trail . Paragraph 14 addresses pervious/impervious surfaces. Pervious materials on this Site for paving will not hold together and will not provide adequate access for emergency vehicles or tenant vehicles. There is no requirement for use of such materials and, in fact, the City of Renton ' s Fire Department will not accept any surface other than paved for an all-weather access to the buildings. Applicant agrees to use impervious materials incorporating the use of oil/water separators, catch basins , and screens. . It is important to note biofiltering swales along the north property line, retention of the low area to the northwest of this property, and the existing swale along the south of this property all recharge water into the area; additional recharge areas are not necessary. This Appeal and Request for Hearing is accompanied by a $75 . 00 filing fee, as required. Respectfully submitted, BOGLE & GATES Charles R. Blumenfeld Attorneys for the Applicant Enclosure cc: Mr. Donald Erickson Department of Planning Mr. David Schuman BUGLE &GATES 5 %• + CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION October 14, 1988 Mr. David Schuman The Schuman Company Bldg 3 , Suite 219 16300 Christianson Road Seattle, Washington 98188 RE: Rivertech Associates-Naches Center ECF-056-88, SA-056-88, and SM-056-88 Correction to Mitigation Measures Dear Mr. Schuman: This letter is to notify you that there is a typo in Condition No. 3 of the Mitigation Measures document for the above referenced project. The intent of the measure was not to allow the fill activity during the critical breeding time for the herons. The condition should have read as follows: 3 . That the applicant place only clean fill on the site which has been approved by the Department of Public Works. Such fill activity will not be allowed to occur between January 23rd and April 30th. or whenever all the heron fledglings have left the nests, whichever is first. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Rivertech Associates - Naches Center ECF;SA;SM-056-88 Correction to Mitigation Measures October 14, 1988 Page 2 I hope this has not created any misunderstanding. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sin erely Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: Mr. Robert Sieh Edwards & Barbieri Attorneys At Law 6501 Columbian Center 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 Mary M. Anderson 13618 SE 180th Renton, Washington 98058 Muckleshoot Tribal Council c/o Morgan Bradley 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, Washington 98002 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (RECONSIDERATION) MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Rivertech Associates ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-056-88 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-056-88, SM-056-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three building: a 3 story office building of 67,000 sq. ft. , and 2 one-story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft. and 23 ,000. sq. ft. respectively. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue S.W. DETERMINATION: Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner to ensure that, to the greatest extent possible, as manyof the significant trees on the site are retained as specified in the FEIS for the Blackriver rezone application. NOTE: Per the FEIS, a minimum of 20% of the site is required to be landscaped with continuous natural landscape materials and large trees may need to be placed in tree wells to protect them. 2 . That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner on revising the landscaping plan to include plants species which will provide sources of food for birds and small animals per the recommendations in the FEIS for Blackriver. - 3 . That the applicant limit fill material to building pads and landings and that the applicant place only clean fill within these portions of the site. Said filling shall not exceed the 100 year floodplain level, plus one (1) foot. This material shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to it's disposition on site. NOTE: Minor grading of parking areas will be allowed sufficient to allow this use. 4 . That the applicant work with the Police Department and the Public Works Department on appropriate haul routes through the City. Trucks will not be allowed to use the roadway (proposed Naches Avenue right-of-way) through the Black River site north of the Forebay area (between January 23rd or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left the nests. • Mitigation Measures Rivertech Associates Page 2 5. That the applicant. limit the operation of construction equipment to the hours between 7 : 00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. , Monday through, Friday per the Blackriver FEIS and that no construction activity shall be allowed within a 1, 200 foot radius of the Heron rookery (to the west of the site) between January 23rd, or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left their nests unless full visual screening, approved by the City, is provided to block construction activity, including glare from , • welding activity or unshielded light sources having an intensity greater than 100 watts. 6. That the applicant shall provide bonding, funding or other security acceptable to the City Attorney sufficient to ensure the planting of a treed buffer within the greenbelt easement to the west along the edge of the old Black River Channel, which will, at maturity, visually screen the Heron rookery from the subject site. NOTE: The applicant or his landscape architect should meet with the City's landscape planner to develop a plan acceptable to the City from which cost estimates for this improvement can be derived. 7 . That the applicant shall work with Metro to develop a TSM program and shall submit a copy to the City prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy permit. 8. That the applicant shall reduce the number of proposed (547 stalls) parking stalls by 70 stalls by eliminating , 45 of the parking stalls and placing 25 stalls into a landscaped reserve per Section 4-2208 (12) . NOTE: The reduction of parking stalls is based upon an 85% efficiency, a standard for industrial developments of this type. To the greatest extent possible the majority of the parking stalls shall be eliminated in the eastern portion of the site near the recreation area. The applicant shall work with the landscape planner on the location of the specific stalls to be eliminated. 9. That the applicant provide the City with a bond or other means acceptable to the City Attorney for their fair share of traffic improvement costs for the Grady Way Benefit area in the amount of approximately $146, 202 . 00 which shall be paid prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. NOTE: The above figure shall be adjusted to reflect a new trip generation charge currently before the City Council for approval. A range of mitigation fees are included in the study. A $70. 00 figure was used since it represents a mid-range level. Once the Council makes a decision regarding the per trip generation fee, the bond amount shall be adjusted to reflect the new fee. 67 x 17 .7/1000 sf = 1185. 9 trips/day 51 x 17 .7/1000 sf = 902 .7 trips/day Total = 2088 . 6 trips/day 2, 088 . 6 trips/day x $±70/trip = $±146, 202 10. That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff on a plan showing indoor recreation space with showers and lockers to serve the employees of the three buildings. Mitigation Measures Rivertech Associates • Page 3 11. That the applicant provide additional passive recreation areas, with seating and tables, on the western portion of the property to the satisfaction of the City's landscape planner. 12 . That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff in providing an easement across the far eastern and southern portions of the property to allow public access along ' the trail system which may potentially become a portion of the City's trail system. 13 . That in order to avoid visual and noise disturbance to the nearby Heron rookery, construction vehicles shall not be allowed to use Naches Avenue S.W. between January. 23rd or whenever the Heron fledglings have left the nests. All construction vehicles shall enter and leave the site via Powell Avenue S.W. 14 . That the applicant use a system of oil/water separators, catch. basins (with filtration screens) and French drains throughout the site, or other acceptable recharge methods, in order to maximize the hydrological recharging of the area's ground water table. NOTE: That the applicant provide a schedule for the periodic cleaning and maintenance of the oil/water separator for approval by the Public Works Department. 15. That the applicant :restore and preserve that portion of a 50 foot natural vegetation landscape buffer around the wetland identified as EO2/3 in Figure 3 of the City of Renton Wetland Study that is on their property. NOTE: This shall be done in a manner approved by the City of Renton and the Department of Ecology including measures to protect the wetland from human encroachment. Such measures do not necessarily necessitate the removal of existing fill materials. Measures selected will be based upon a careful review of the site and impacts on the wetland at issue by personnel from the City and DOE. mmdoc . CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION October 7, 1988 Mr. David Schuman The Schuman Company Bldg. 3, Suite 219 16300 Christianson Road Seattle, WA 98188 RE: Rivertech Associates - Naches Center ECF-056-88, SM-056-88 ; SA-056-88 Revised Mitigation Measures Dear Mr. Schuman: Enclosed please find a revised mitigation measure document for the above referenced project. Due to an error on our part, Condition No. 5 did not correctly reflect the original approved Staff recommendations. As a result, please note that Condition Nos. 5 and 14 have been combined, thereby deleting No. 14 entirely, so that the conditions contained in the document now are true and correct. The appeal period continues to run until 5: 00 PM, October 17, 1988 . 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 toe Mr. David Schuman Rivertech Associates - Naches Center Revised Mitigation Measures ECF-056-88 , SM-056-88 , SA-056-88 October 7, 1988 If you have any questions please give me a call. Thank you for your patience and understanding in this matter. M51 rel Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp Enclosures Page 2 cc: Mr. Robert Sieh Edwards & Barbieri Attorneys At Law 6501 Columbian Center 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Mary M. Anderson 13618 SE 180th Renton, WA 98058 Muckleshoot Tribal Council 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98002 4 0 • CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION October 7 , 1988 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 RE: Rivertech Associates - Naches Center ECF-056-88, SM-056-88, SA-056-88 Revised Mitigation Measures Enclosed please find a revised mitigation measure document. for the above referenced project. Due to an error on our part, Condition No. 5 did not correctly reflect the original approved Staff recommendations. As a result, please note that Conditions No. 5 and 14 have been combined, thereby deleting No. 14 entirely, so that the conditions contained in the document now are true and correct. The appeal period continues to run until 5: 00 PM, October 17, 1988 . If you have any questions please contact my office. .S.±Ticere Donald G. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp Enclosure cc: Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robles, Department of Fisheries Mr. Gerald Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, METRO 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 �i CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION • October 6, 1988 Muckleshoot Tribal Council 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98002 • RE: Rivertech Associates - Naches Center (Reconsideration) ECF-056-88, SM-056-88 Dear Sirs: . Enclosed please find a copy of the above noted Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for your review. Please contact our office if you have any questions or desire clarification. Sincerely, cylc.drOCtl_, Jeannette Samek-McKague Senior Planner JSM:mjp Enclosure 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 r2 / , ' ..I _IV . q 0 0 CITY OF RENTON ..IL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION October 3, 1988 Mr. David Schuman The Schuman Company Building 3, Suite 219 16300 Christianson Road Seattle, WA 98188 RE: Rivertech Associates - Naches Center (Reconsideration) ECF-056-88, SM-056-88 This letter is to inform you that a DNS with modified mitigation measures and new conditions have been adopted by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) for the above noted project. A Threshold Determination was issued on August 17, 1988. Comments were received during a fifteen (15) day comment period which ended on September 6, 1988. There is a fourteen (14) day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM on October 17, 1988. Pursuant to its statutory authority the City's Environmental Review Committee has issued the following modified mitigation measures and new conditions for the above referenced project: 1. - That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner to ensure that to the greatest extent possible as many of the significant trees on site are retained. 2. That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner on revising the landscaping plan to include plants which will provide sources of food for birds and small animals. 3. That the applicant place only clean fill on the site which has been approved by the Department of Public Works. Such fill activity will be allowed to occur only between January 23rd, and April 30th, or whenever all the heron fledglings have left the nests, whichever is first. 4. That the applicant work with the Police Department and the Public Works Department on appropriate haul routes through the City. Trucks will not be allowed to use the roadway (proposed Naches Avenue r.o.w.) through the Black River site north of the Forebay area between January 23rd and July 31st or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left the nests, whichever is first. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 I J , Rivertech Associates-Naches Cell.__ (Reconsideration) Notice of Determination October 3, 1988 Page 2 5. That the applicant limit the operation of construction equipment to the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. No outdoor construction activity shall be allowed within one half mile of the Heron Rookery between January 23 and July 31 or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left the nests, whichever is first. 6. That the applicant shall provide funding or other means acceptable to the City Attorney sufficient to ensure the planting of a treed buffer which will, at maturity, visually screen the Heron rookery from the subject site. NOTE: The applicant or his landscape architect should meet with the City's landscape planner to develop an acceptable plan from which cost estimates can be derived. 7. That the applicant shall work with Metro to develop a TSM program and shall submit a copy to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. That the applicant shall reduce the number of proposed (547 stalls) parking stalls by 70 stalls by eliminating 45 of the parking stalls and placing 25 stalls into a landscaped reserve per Section 4-2208(12). NOTE: To the greatest extent possible the majority of the parking stalls shall be eliminated in the eastern portion of the site near the recreation area. The applicant shall work with the landscape planner on the location of the specific stalls to eliminate. NOTE: The reduction of parking stalls is based upon an 85% efficiency, a standard for industrial developments. 9. That the applicant provide the City with their fair share of traffic improvement costs for the Grady Way Benefit area in the amount of $411, 454.20. NOTE: The amount was arrived at using the following equation: 67 x 17.7/1000 sf = 2088.6 trips/day 51 x 17.7/1000 sf = 902.7 trips/day Total = 2088.6 trips/day 2,088.6 trips/day x $197/trip = $411,454.20 NOTE: This figure may be adjusted once occupancy is established for the complex. 10. That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff on a plan showing indoor recreation space with showers and lockers to serve the employees of the three buildings. 11. That the applicant provide additional passive recreation areas, with seating and tables, on the western portion of the property. Rivertech Associates-Naches Cen._. Reconsideration) Notice of Determination October 3, 1988 Page 3 12. That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff in providing an easement across the far eastern and southern portions of the property to allow public access along the trail system which may potentially become a portion of the City's trail system. 13. That in order to avoid visual and noise disturbance to the nearby Heron rookery, construction vehicles shall not be allowed to use Naches Avenue S.W. between January 23rd and July 31st. All construction vehicles shall enter and leave the site via Powell Avenue S.W. 14. That the applicant shall provide a temporary visual screen which shall visually block construction activity such as welding and night lighting on the construction site from the view of the Herons in the rookery to the west of the site while the building is being built. NOTE: Construction scaffolding and fabric windbreak curtains have been suggested as one alternative by the applicant. Said screen shall exceed the height and width of the building. 15. That the applicant, in the surface parking areas on the site, shall use either pervious materials such as interlocking pavers or granular asphalt or impervious materials incorporating the use of French drains, oil/water separators, catch basins and screens into the stormwater drainage system for the site in order to help recharge underlying wetlands. NOTE: That the applicant provide a schedule for the periodic cleaning and maintenance of the stormwater system for approval by the Public Works Department. 16. That the applicant restore and preserve the wetland identified as EO2/3 in Figure 3 of the City of Renton Wetland Study. This wetland shall be restored and preserved as follows: a. The applicant shall provide a 50 foot natural vegetation landscape buffer be provided around the wetland. b. The applicant shall remove any existing fill from this wetland and the 50 foot buffer area. c. The applicant shall restore the wetland and buffer areas in a manner approved by the City of Renton and the Department of Ecology including measures to protect the protect the wetland from human encroachment. 1 , , , Rivertech Associates-Naches Censer kReconsideration) Notice of Determination October 3, 1988 Page 4 The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 PMp on October 17, 1988. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non- refundable $75.00 filing fee. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2550. he E 'ro e tal Review Committee, (74) Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:m jp cc: Mr. Robert Sieh Edwards & Barbieri Attorneys At Law 6501 Columbian Center 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 IF/ tit %i 0 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION October 3, 1988 Washington State Department of Ecology . Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations issued on September 29, 1988: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED KOHL PRELIMINARY PLAT Application to subdivide a 1.27 tract into six (6) residential lots for future construction of single-family homes. Property is located on the north side of Sunset Avenue S.W. (Empire Way South) between 80th and 81st Avenue. ECF-054-88; V-054-88 The fifteen (15) day comment period for this project will end on October 18, 1988. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (RECONSIDERATION) RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES - NACHES CENTER Application for site plan approval to allow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings; a 3 story office building of 67,000 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28,000 and 23,000 sq. ft., respectively. Property is located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue S.W. ECF-056-88, SM-056-88 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 0 Environmental Determine, ns September 30, 1988 Page 2 A Threshold Determination was issued on August 17, 1988. Comments were received during a fifteen (15) day comment period which ended on September 6, 1988. A DNS with modified mitigation measures and new conditions have been adopted by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC). There is a fourteen (14) day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM on October 17, 1988. If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. Si). 1p ,t. ,,(2,#._______ Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries DKE:mjp 11 1 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has re-issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code: RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES - NACHES CENTER Application for site plan approval to allow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings; a 3 story office building of 67 , 000 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/ R & D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft. and 23 , 000 sq. ft. , respectively. Property is located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue S.W. ECF-056-88 , SM-056-88. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5: 00 PM on October 17, 1988 . Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. Published: OCTOBER 3 , 1988 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) RECONSIDERATION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-056-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SM-056-88 PROPONENT: RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES - NACHES CENTER DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings; a 3 story office building of 67, 000 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 and 23 , 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property is located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue S.W. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . A Threshold Determination was issued on August 17, 1988 . Comments were received during a fifteen (15) day comment period which ended on September 6, 1988. A DNS with modified mitigation measures and new conditions have been adopted by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) . There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5: 00 PM on October 17, 1988 . Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: October 3 , 1988 DATE OF DECISION: September 29, 1988 SIGNATURES: di i// _ -� ill Ronald G. Nelson �' S'•r4.ger Building Official Planning page Ai Ric ar C. oughton Public Wo s Director /// F &if : DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (RECONSIDERATION) MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Rivertech Associates ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-056-88 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-056-88, SM-056-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three building: a 3 story office building of 67, 000 sq. ft. , and 2 one-story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft. and 23, 000. sq. ft. respectively. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue S.W. DETERMINATION: Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant work with the City' s Landscape Planner to ensure that to the greatest extent possible as many of the significant trees on site are retained. 2 . 'c1That the applicant work with the City' s Landscape Planner on evising the landscaping plan to include plants which will pr ide sources of food for birds and small animals. 3. That the applicant place only clean fill on the site which has been approved by the Department of Public Works. Such fill activity will\be allowed to occur only between January 23rd, and April 30th, or whenever all the heron fledglings have left the nests, whichever is first. 4. That the applicant work with the Police Department and the Public Works Department on appropriate haul routes through the City. Trucks will not be allowed to use the roadway (proposed Naches Avenue r.o.w. ) through the Black River site north of the Forebay area between January 23rd and July 31st or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left the nests, whichever is first. 5. That the applicant limit the operation of construction equipment to the hours of 7 : 00 a.m. and 7 : 00 p.m. , Monday through Friday per the Blackriver F.E.I.S and that no construction activity shall be allowed within a 1, 200 foot radius of the Heron Rookery (to the west of the site) between January 23rd and July 31st, or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left their nests, whichever is first, unless full visual screening, approved by the City, is provided between the Heron Rookery and any said construction activity occuring on the site. NOTE TO APPLICANT: Such screening shall be adequate to visually block glare from welding activity or unshielded light sources that have an intensity greater than 100 watts. 6. That the applicant shall provide funding or other means acceptable to the City Attorney sufficient to ensure the planting of a treed buffer which will, at maturity, visually screen the Heron rookery from the subject site. Mitigation Measures Rivertech Associates Page 2 NOTE: The applicant or his landscape architect should meet with the City's landscape planner to develop an acceptable plan from which cost estimates can be derived. 7. That the applicant shall work with Metro to develop a TSM program and shall submit a copy to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. That the applicant shall reduce the number of proposed (547 stalls) parking stalls by 70 stalls by eliminating 45 of the parking stalls and placing 25 stalls into a landscaped reserve per Section 4-2208 (12) . NOTE: To the greatest extent possible the majority of the parking stalls shall be eliminated in the eastern portion of the site near the recreation area. The applicant shall work with the landscape planner on the location of the specific stalls to eliminate. NOTE: The reduction of parking stalls is based upon an 85% efficiency, a standard for industrial developments. 9. That the applicant provide the City with their fair share of traffic improvement costs for the Grady Way Benefit area in the _ amount of $411, 454 .20. NOTE: The amount was arrived at using the following equation: 67 x 17.7/1000 sf = 2088 . 6 trips/day 51 x 17.7/1000 sf = 902 .7 trips/day Total = 2088 . 6 trips/day 2, 088. 6 trips/day x $197/trip = $411, 454 .20 NOTE: This figure may be adjusted once occupancy is established for the complex. 10. That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff on a plan showing indoor recreation space with showers and lockers to serve the employees of the three buildings. 11. That the applicant provide additional passive recreation areas, with seating and tables, on the western portion of the property. 12 . That the applicant work with the Planning' Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff in providing an easement across the far eastern and southern portions of the property to allow public access along the trail system which may potentially become a portion of the City' s trail system. 13 . That in order to avoid visual and noise disturbance to the nearby Heron rookery, construction vehicles shall not be allowed to use Naches Avenue S.W. between January 23rd and July 31st. All construction vehicles shall enter and leave the site via Powell Avenue S.W. r7 ,/, , , • Mitigation Measures Rivertech Associates • Page 3 14 . That the applicant, in the surface parking areas on the site, shall use either pervious materials such as interlocking pavers or granular asphalt or use impervious materials incorporating the use of French drains, oil/water separators, catch basins and screens into the stormwater drainage system for the site in order to help recharge underlying wetlands. NOTE: That the applicant provide a schedule for the periodic cleaning and maintenance of the stormwater system for approval by the Public Works Department. 15. That the applicant restore and preserve the wetland identified as EO2/3 in Figure 3 of the City of Renton Wetland Study. This wetland shall be restored and preserved as follows: a. The applicant shall provide a 50 foot natural vegetation landscape buffer be provided around the wetland. b. The applicant shall remove any existing fill from this wetland and the 50 foot buffer area. c. The applicant shall restore the wetland and buffer areas in a manner approved by the City of Renton and the Department of Ecology including measures to protect the wetland from human encroachment. mmdoc I ENVIRONMENTAL • DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-056-88, SM-056-88 APPLICANT RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES — NACHES CENTER PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF NACHES CENTER CONSISTING OF 3 BUILDINGS; A 3 STORY OFFICE BUILDING OF 67,000 SQ. FT. AND 2 ONE STORY OFFICE/R&D BUILDINGS WITH 28,000 AND 23,000 SQ. FT, RESPECTIVELY. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE 600 BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE S.W. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS } OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT • • HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. • AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. • THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS • PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. • COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY • AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., OCTOBER 17, 19RR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER. AUTHORIZATION. CERTIFICATION• I , IJE2Rl LI► rip , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT j . 3 • CUPIE THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN • C S OF � R•EE ( 3 ,� CONSPICUOUS . PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON OC1OrStr( 4.. 1GgE • . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in end for the State of Washington • residing in �QFNToki , on the '-/ , day of 6t4pei, � •SIGNED : (,�� J E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-056-88 , SM-056-88 APPLICANT RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES - NACHES CENTER PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF NACHES CENTER CONSISTING OF 3 BUILDINGS ; A 3 STORY OFFICE BUILDING OF 67 , 000 SQ. FT. AND 2 ONE STORY OFFICE/R&D BUILDINGS WITH 28, 000 AND 23 , 000 SQ. FT, RESPECTIVELY. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE 600 BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE S .W. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., OCTOBER 17, 1988 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE 7 ' WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. Architecture and Planning Li Leason Pomeroy Northwest, Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 September 20, 1988 Jerry Lind Department of Zoning City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: RIVERTECH CORPORATE CENTER (FORMERLY NACHES CENTER) Dear Jerry: The following tabulation reflects the revised site plan incorporating the 50 foot buffer to the north of Building #1: Site Area: + 435,600 S.F. Building Area: + 114,600 S.F. Building Footprint: + 65,260 S.F. Gross Coverage: + 26% Site Coverage: + 15% Parking: + 552 Stalls (1/208 S.F. ) Standard: + 324 Stalls Compact: + 220 Stalls (+40%) Handicap: + 8 Stalls Reserve: + 41 Stalls Sincerely i---) i9-4 :;7 Paul R. C = � ,"":'. �.„�� s�:,;:a oppock i. 6_'1 iS t./ l� f PRC:db CT---— 9c, r-1 cc: David Schuman Royce A. Berg JLr GU - DC 1!J•Y C LI"I Y H LM1 U1:, DCI� U1 r k'Jb r•L."- • • Y , S / , f ooson f orneroy r,idi fhwa;f, Inc..15-byes A.Berg;4`f,A..TT27Pine S4'00- Suite 300;:c offlla,WA 081U (206)583 80`3u..__. DRAFT 4 F ®1 September 20, 1988 EVADING/ZONING DEFT. Jerry Lind Department of Zoning City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: RIVERTECH CORPORATE CENTER (FORMERLY NACHES CENTER) Dear Jerry: The following tabulation reflects the revised site plan incorporating the 50 foot buffer to the north of Building #1: Site Area: + 435,600 S.F. Building Area: + 114,600 S.F. Building Footprint: + 65,260 S.F. Gross Coverage; + 26% Site Coverage: + 15% Parking: + 552 Stalls (1/208 S.F. ) Standard: + 324 Stalls Compact; + 220 Stalls (+40%) Handicap; + 8 Stalls Reserve: + 41 Stalls Sincerely, Paul R. Coppock PRK;db cc: David Schuman Royce A. Berg ram, �1 SEP 20 '88 18:21 LPN ARCHITECTS (206)583-0708 P.1/2 TELECOM' COVER SHEET POLICY DCVELo .,;; CITY OF RENTON LPN Architects & Planners (ö) SEP 2 0 1988 1127 Pine Street, Suite 300 jp Seattle, WA 98101 J E C 1 (i \v E (206) 583-8030 FAX: 583-0708 r, '-i ') Date: /f? 'fir' L.. 'p ��"t '," Time: /791,llii DEPT. Deliver to: iywy Gidc, ' Company: FAX No. :� 7_- 6/3 ' Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: Job No.: ze r 4C. - O/9 Items: From:P ., _ - By: A45";' If you do not receive all of the indicated pages, please call. Thank you, :a1613m03 ctsgG c-011412(fil (141 ''frgq 3WP t-L—) saL 6110D c'e/ nk a .)/1-cY\A f\ IA;q (7 010 ICIJICAMIkrict ONI1 a) DNICINalai ariacea 3N0Hci =NZ 101'3110 30 MILLI CM/ WIN , itc2— 06'0 (ma) • VI ; (alias) \A,,,,t OQfr :aILL :112EINCINJAYdLIdC.§3b I ea" lot :a0Naliazoo dO alva .. 1190.-,2iN\I :maccud 11210d2l a3NEEMIL\103 City of Renton Environmental Review Committee MEETING NOTICE September 19, 1988 To: Larry Springer Mike Parness Dick Houghton Ron Nelson Glen Gordon From: Don Erickson, Secretary Meeting Date: September 21, 1988 Time: 10:00 AM Location: Third Floor Conference Room Agenda attached below. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA SEPTEMBER 21, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 AM TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS CONTINUING PROJECT RIVERTECII ASSOCIATES - NACHES CENTER Application for site plan approval to allow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings; a 3 story office building of 67,000 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28,000 sq. ft. and 23,000 sw. ft, respectively. Property located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue S.W. ECF-056-88, SA-056-88, SM-056-88. .4 NEW PROJECT S" • Projects that could possibly be referred from the TAC meeting today. p CITY OF RENTON F =LL POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT `xT1(r •11 =.2 5 = 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 ,,�ii��:�► i 1-1/A s�• PB METER • 5058616 U.S.POSTAGE Fairy • - 'e i e Associates • c/o Junta Da - 26 ;I e ane Los Altos Hills , CA 94022 !I i i III I I ! I II ! . , F----------,- i '1. ''. .. ' ; • c '•- - ./i 4; • --. '' -- • . ''.3 p;z1 1,..._ 4----..: I ___ s. 2- • 0 -- ----, ----41- -____4L-r-Li_ii Hi/ ------ L jo.g: , ---, ` .:''' .. - ''.:.;:, :f 8 4 . .--.17-.3"- J2-••••,-_- • '41;, i is 7,--11-- .,i4-,,---.._. .: . ft I - „•., . \ • ....:.. 4,-•/ Z,., ' . t:'•, ' tifit .1 I ''. ' l • .. 7 lift. ft I r 4AV I:It • •...-.'NOV 1' . I .: •...,3,, • ...4 I I . 14,4 crzi r • .„,..- -.I. \ o- . . i 'T • Ili"' I litlif ft NP , L-----------____10.-.-i IN< 111'4 ii, WI '• •- it, il 7.7toir I/ 11,4...v:fit .. . .i---...71=: "...----"aftiL---,.---;,-. -2 ! '-•-• , 1 - .•/ _ ... ----. s 1 /OttL?...fia.( .• 4 --I C r a.7-'w• to- " / ill fir ii• - ,,so, .. ...... - D. • . . . • 4411 -1.1 . rP , ,,,..., . •9 - a 4 t i i '3. ') li \/////11,1P...4&17?... t.,_•:'-Wftftgfift_41:! *di. 1 - . , 1 ••t • i#4t 74' 41.7 it,...tk',0 10 41;44•4 .1.1 ___.--•-• . ' „ 1 4* •:4', •i.• tf••••-.'''" • •.* • 0 4 .Iiil •:?:0•1 Ifp'f'.ar I V , .. • 4111 ; $14.4.1:611e.'' 4 i- •. ". , ..,:..•. .,.. 44" • • • • do 1 '" '4110 414.40 . ..- . P 4' . *ArilYrapp.,„1,' - . • "0 -4k •• esis,A4./....4.,• -. ..-- •••MIONINiaill Om- Ip :. \- ----:::;" .,,, \ .. .04 i , 11) # . . •V..-4, ii" • i R-1 i ,- ---•_... FOuD-03-t- 257 , ----- . % \--vs , . . Y .'-. -\''''.•• a' • • - . 'Mr 7 / \, \ \ ..‘ .- -- • . 0, v", ---. - . ' II r) ' •• r" — ,''? • •4: 1''' -aiwAh'b i's : ; '•,•:-3•11 .. ' 4 - t: -.---- ,, , ‘ ••....••' 4 P , `, .\. , D : .: ..•c.:.••• .,' '-I • •:.,i:::..I.V•••• ‘--71 : ... ..... , . ., 0 - . I . . ' . •• I . • .4 \ ' -Jil. ..•• a 1 ::`, '•% I A - , . , . NACHES CENTER I4PP SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-056-88 . • • . , . .. . APPLICANT RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES • . TOTAL AREA + 10 ACRES . - : PRINCIPAL ACCESS NACHES.AVENUE 2S',..W. ..& POWELL -AVENUE'S.W: • - ,. .. .:,.., ::, ' ,:. . . ,... .„. EXISTING ZONING O-P, OFFICE PARK . , EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF THREE (3) OFFICE, BUILDINGS. ' . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULT.IPLE OPTION. COMMENTS LOCATED AT. THE 600 BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE S.W. . , . . , . . • TABULATION SITE AREA 2435,800 S.F. BUILDING AREA 211%000 SF r VICINITY MAP OF ADJACENT USES BUILDING FOOTPRINT 271,398 SF. \ "'T� COVERAGE 227E ,\ WETLAND UNADOPTED ,t• SITE COVERAGE 218% WETLAND ^` PARKING EXTENSION OF• STANDARD s222 STALLS NACNES AVE., . ' t-•.�BNR[(N \ .`�w _ CON COMPACT :m STALLS W9.e)YcI 7' M ND, HANDICAP se STALLS COI-t»= �',= ACHE.S-;II �i_ "�RN Ag1L TOTAL J:sn STALLS V+ `4-°QC,.. 9Z7 'n •'''K _ROq W '^';Y �1i+r 4-'r • ..YA r s547 S.F.RASED ON _\ :.:..,:�'.�_�,,.. _ _K.tlaN+r n• ' .:X •�{E+Y __ �ilYv- • 92%EMI:MACY '-`:�.'� . '�. AREA WITIDN ,,\ <.a••✓��,Y b �'^�juI° �A.Fr �®100 YEAR hL00DPLAN VICINITY MAP • ar � • o DvE�• CC a :�•i ^' / .� NORTH SCALE ,l O V.3',t~�-' ° l� �03' z?? p �' Z ,\\\ 1! ' :•``ci•6 .,f ,'1,7 ,..„' Z ° 0 sNne.. < axoN .L,-,orr,..erv- UNADOPTED \\\�\\. vs•��Eo v;a.?•q a::' • win. . -�°: 0 I/ WETLAND \�\ ,�' ��----I' 1 t1 'Fii V Q z I r J� s,r*I swz.�o� ,,\ \\\\ .:.?./. • ', I J D I A Nom' • E e _ T \ ---- k•• ______±N21.4,21-4-...0 • \\ \ \ wDaECTLiHE• '^ Z 1 I ,`\`.. I.. / �� \ � E, ,,.GTE L0�v.. '# (, N M f(SOPE 1d8O O ¢AD MOF AVM,Y t oR ita4PAL a z t �',`:'-� �_ — y{ .- �yr iTD co T a,Ye w M e!f 15'00'W OsaaD __ _- • ^C Z 1 A1• " " I o-_W II O\ , ) � tati ,..• , -`r :arr...213 1 4•./'µ'p I-EE ro D REMOVED TREES TO BE VRESENVE° NORTX`'\\L t2:f Inl''!" -4-I rt I cl(.;t.l' ,.� 1—« ,eE .� v TREE� • i •fkill lial Il21 w - I bm I I it, )Ihi Y'4 •59. ..I 3F. 6 i3p. • tC- 12e' VP111. 3 2)r d K1�/ _'��\^ F,.Tuae.xwGw i— -. 's _1ILI� _ a _n.Doo SA. l/1 � • Taw 69�' 1 II - ' _ 11.I 1 12-- I I I I I t ' 1 I I �� �/r �!.' R / °\//-�^•—�•I '�1 I I 1 1 _ I I/�,f.b i.l _ ;',-i. I\T \\ :-_—,_>z. b0 h7_ I, �! _..:�_\ (� _ �— D r l';_ ��� _ I I _A` `\I/!+`-_�',-ems—\ _��I J I' s Ii• I ILA^ I I 1 I I%I _l i f to �.._� 'IE. '`. \ � / ',IK � `i e_ �� \\�.', -5-'4 '' ,0_,- _ - .. •%::__....�: x. I Fa'�—�«` =f'..�Se`"'Sim' xae_ts 6°3lJd4Ri9^„`�.� i`�. N09'1`i'evsr �. T - s.— as . ., _ _ ir. .—=''"4pi` •L-4=. y_ —----- _ 11II - _ 2- —� •' • \ ~ ✓-I•. E%STNG IXiANAGE SWALE EXISTING 20 usEl6R U!E `\_—=— _ IN,• ' ;•-' \ `A^"^ • ,JL� J\\ _ \ .-Y_�--1 V) \,` \_ C•.•~. w ACCESS MAINTENANCE EASEMENT� • DO PIPELINE 8 TRAIE:±ORTA �-.,_T EHS'M1i WED G.? I R"P-' LG?3(LT Do'TH'. OF OIL AND GAS EASEMENT•s.I QO _) I d o - ._ i . .�"J.i Q1 ngc.:s'�CUED A_D WT-Ez _ Y NO.DESCRIPTION DATE , ' Ej(ISTiW OaJ�hYTE •'' Q l AN2 nS•W2.. (.IJTTE2 S ' "I�1 N j 1 f AND S•DEHi4._E N-yIJYVTTA.T-1-n E,b V5 I ;<I 4' I d W5 Z i I ExISTNc BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING I I � I /Q I al � °°� ' ; NACRES CENTER BUGDNc 2 I W i % SITE PLAN �� v�— W;a •"k THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES EXISTMGE SWALE Ilk i, 1 dl �° 0 1,5 ISD ,DD 1 .. „ } RENTON.WASHINGTON Extsrwc BUILDING ' G,�. 2D `tt• ° « uY` w PROPOSED GRADE • • z ` SITE PLAN 't E%ISTNG GRADE SITE SECTION A 1/5D° JOB H0.8e01. NO OF DATE 'fr,.^E'SHEET 1 of 9 DRAWN•CAS CHECK Pe- \„ \ PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND „ \ \ 15x1rffiri,cr0.414..u.,-rp.r&--T.> rcol•-• -,-Ao ..... H,..-so.t-w-ri-e,0.7r',fir-.1. 0 ••••IL.W.../ 1 rkseerrt44-1 40,00., e,-,-,11.-rt.6,,,k,...-f v ( :1,..) (I)_ .t• ‘0,1,0 -feoso., -,,i9g4, r",- -,,ro.rrro4-1 feer r.ezo,-,, - .. • 2v24. ,,,,•4;1,2evaat.. ' '1,41; .— \\ Z ce-,/,,,,,,1_ _e....f:r41,-- ...-0c0e,,A49r4rx--00'.*--.6.,.-AP,44,1,-,,,-.14,-,i: 64-iE < \\ - c"'"") ~-C.17 0-4.,1-6-,,,,f;547.1.- R4...4,14,-.0v-t-/900.,-1 (*.lir' Ce a. ILLI 2 \\ ego,09 -r,,,,,,,rz•ca-,,,,,-*. .., 1,11-171U-Hria,-iii4c...-, 0,,i-f0,,,tr.-, • 4-11t44-0,0,I&pi, 6 w o,..o. or- -I"roll . , ",%, I-- 0 ''\• 1 \ '• LI-o I-I,,e4A,G0 ar"'A V ° Z alii.,"freltf rri ,6`...1 CO. P+71.1.6..-10,4(VIL, LLJ e.•14514,09 •'1 -1.,,,o, ivr- -{0,4, 0 .s Z .\ A 0 1— < Z .--..---,..--- .,-i-z, 1.,...e..evra-1-1 ..--4-rei rx••11-1E nre0(0.7 • 2 T C) Cl) = CI)® \•'` 1 _ 7.44,m,-r,r-4,41" ft.,0-1-w , 11 50 -,,s,..en 0 \ 5.4,-,,,.. H.4,40 ,0 2..1. , \ - 7 \ \1 ...... ; .._-- ---.0 I •-• rl5130"EIUSSN.4 • •',. C/N) 0v M. a-5%54o-, - _ --, 'N.,,,..., = w. •- -ItAl'' ' , / v's~Ai ..11migimarrovit ..-Ai.A, • v)r '---, .-../ ..z... Z 1-• cc • I El it.« . .W. _ .,„.,,... — ., • •,„„,• . ,..-:, _ . '''' "i" MI Lil'ir ..a, '• 'V* ' ,i, '' 1 - ''', 1 . tgiffe . -V. Li -.II tit ig"0,0; %yr!,t 2i',. ' ,, e'‘•,:,,,„.,. - 7- - -- -,,E,, 4.-: 04.,,,-.....,-,.: -.„, ....;.. - ....t.b;. . t-,.... ....._ ---V..q_rov, .5..i, . VEdlinfivi-f,a•1 I I,\'II I Cl. ...0 ft" i 1 . '. -< .B..-.tegi,,, ....,- 11.4111.- ..--,.:40,,,,ws....t..... .--.-1171...A. "••04...,:t•-1 • 1 li I It!, 11, --• --rT14,01§61 ..i.- d 1601/AC. ,,, _,_ ..•1 .....e.,......ta lit• cl"- ..,346•61tal,„.5036.4.6.3,,,,........ -- , :.- . , ,t I ._.....p .. -.44, ,• , - .---,.. 11-F10,4 ....0.7, ..5..-,7 I t 1 1 It • 111011F-4; itIvrt,-.1 '— 5,5,-.17, Arm...o50 . i „,....,,., )s_ .,. 2 • tr.:64'41.24%w ':' ,/i7-.7...44. --;;---',—,-------_,,,,,_ ck_s _ I ••;- •.!.• ..:• I 1 iv.,i .. - i --\ • 1 .- ., ,. / ------t.s---, i z 1 16 -,..4,e.,,,a, 0.0.,A.,, i - ' kW' _ ArWill'qp• '''''..-",iv III l.'s'''. '' 3' .......... - "b' ,, .11:_f411.111:141',k7.11F"alli ---'----:.------',.._ - .1.-wl,,a,"------,:-- ---------______ '• I i' .-VI 1,e1 :NI, ,,__._ ,......,... _ ..,_ _ _ 1 I..... ist:,----iiradr. --4-, .' - .14-mtir- 11 -,.e.grTh.Y.-- -4_,,-! ,,,—,, I ..,....--... ...--- __ ilISMILw.w. -, ,,i 1.0...0 VT .......' "'-- '-/a 4., "Vitra . iriltirlir. •1,114-A. - - ---- • • 1 0" -1,. ;,--•;; L-,•,,!‘-- .. --- ->'----_,_,__-"''''!--;--..____ \\.-.:-•---H g: \ 711 ),,,e.". w..04 'et_ ..-• .. . .. . .4- , ......*lip •....,-..A.,,, ,,•-elf .- , —4.-Tia_ttrelemaittemew ,'," ft - •-•• -••'''-''r ----.:.-- ----____ •••• • .• \% •'•. 9_ jar:17:7v 1_I_,,''__'_;'.--.WifStiq•!,;! ; ..„9;-.i 1\'1, .;:_..../.- :vaph-..., ...,, , , met‘c lait-± 7,7" \ --------„.„-- Or rtic. •<,,'" " ' f - 10,4"-'-‘-------- °" -'46411V1,-4.1"....wart ..,=-: -.:.,,,I*404, - . LMIIII's...A 11'111!illin'1111 d. '{-° /*-''' -.., *ea," • ..':.;': ' ' i• ."-r•-..,.-----_ ..------ - -, •,,,a,•_ ,_/..-- f,,k..., •,. -s' . • - _-- - Mk"' 4, • --"--• ---;---.:«.-.17:::::' - ---• ''... .- - —-7, `Ze..... ' .'' ' 4 ,.._..A._:_--:-......_ _..____ . .. . N Eft ••. " ."."n..." „,-,...:- . „:,-4- "t'll"CSi,e• ! .•' "- . '..."'•t, -1.— - . _____.7 __ -------....• N 09 10 25.W El 57 ..-. .--,--! _ ______ --L_____ , / _ :. I-- ' EXISTING MANAGE SWALE—/' / ACCESS MAINTENANCE EASEMENT—// EXISTING 20 EASERBIT UNE I„ _, ,........_, ,...„ 11,-----r,—,- ..- ai; ; o'-.4.4-; 6-a 212 PIPEAWE•TNANSPON1ATII Al OF 011.6 CPS EASEMENT 1 r 1 1 r 1 7,- NO DESCRIPTION DATE P42.AP•RA,A,-I2.7,--EN0 I 1 MST,.RUCLNEG rj EXIST.)121-DING 542,',-12 PAP.T1:.•,_.-I 0. LEGEND NACHES CENTER The 0 PAIN 1.141ITS - & Mitchell LANDSCAPE PLAN ----' THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES Nelson Iirl . Group RENTON,WASHINGTON Incorporated LAnd Pam, 112,EL'erreerAPN. "at" .)( J 10 secno.mPoti(2.459.11.0 LantlaaiNuAZutectme LANDSCAPE PLAN =1Z= ...b. . JOB N008014 SHEET NO ir _ . DAT E •(//J.,7/ 7 of 0 LEMAN.1,..r.44 • CNECE,..r;W 120' .1, f 310' - y 45'I I' 120' N l W FRIHthL . ( , ( i CC a • BLDG.2 WEST ELEVATION BLDG.2 SOUTH ELEVATION w 2 310' , 120' , F 0 145' , , 90' , Z 0 0 < Z . inir ii _-- 1 i7[177 - P. C/) n cf},- BLDG.2 NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.2 EAST ELEVATION .i V BUILDING 2 Q W OI Z I=- iii Painted Tilt Up Concrete Panel— Tinted Glass- —Reflective Glass r`£ Y 125' 270' _ 1 illrit' 7 I 1 • ,,I i t . y_20.- �, 59' y r4 ► i77 r I , MD DESCIIITIOM WTE �..�....�•.,a:.Ae-ee BLDG. 3- WEST ELEVATION Entry(typ.)J BLDG.3 SOUTH ELEVATION , 272 y_ _'— 55__ -I I I j • 1 _1 I i 1 I 1 1 1 1 I --T���c -f�.r i i i rtnr,'r l i i n� r.trr-+rrlhra� u: >✓ i. T,I ( �� )I Ili �'11_i,p , -_ rBL 3 NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.3 EAST ELEVATION BUILDING 3 ,. NACHES CENTER • ELEVAT: THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES BLDGS. & In'h r 3 - f� .M1.U. RENTON,WASHINGTON ELEVATIONS BLDGS.2&3 JOGMo4S0T. SHEET NO a - DATE •` S As AW CG M� 9 of 9 DM CHECK.P.sa:. Cl) W 137'•2' I 224'•10' / Z 77,9' 59••5' 77-9' 69-a' 7T-9' CC a.J , — — Brick Panel Mechanical Screen —Concrete Panel —Tinted Glass W 2r ____=_ M� gip _> _9. _ _ __ 1 1 1 _ 1 Z V Z MIIIMIIIIIniii rur��rr■r■rrrr�rr■nu■■■■■■■h®a® xL - \a w Q z I i UIIIIIIIIIIIIIII■IIIIU■I■■■B■■■■P■ .ili — Cl) I up LIU U Reflective Glass--J �Main Entry = in Z U w OO BLDG.1 EAST ELEVATION BLDG.1 SOUTH ELEVATION Z I-- we i224'-10' •._ 137'-2 59'-5' ST•o' 0_SJ' ' i 59,5' 59'-5' / a - •+77._9. •0 DESCAPTE1H UTE 1 I I i I 1 i 1 I i. ! , Secondary Entry—I Secondary Entry BLDG.1 NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.1 WEST ELEVATION ' . NACHES CENTER """ THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES • BLDG 1IONS IrIM , RENTON,WASHINGTON ,Sme•1w0E91163tlia - ' ELEVATIONS BLDG.1 • • ' 'JOB H0'88014 SHEET MO P'. DATE .y.HA tS r OMWH" CA' 8 of 9 CHECK.FRG e Y. - _ ............ F , . . ....., , . . . . , . • ... .,___ ,,.. , 4,...„. „...,:,;,„ ,,..., „...,,,, i.,7 ,.....___:_, 1_,..____i,.. . L.....tg--.. S A 3i-- F--------7----------- '1.1'..,,.. i :11. ?::7i..' 0 I afte4�, • � aT, .� ' eezI `:: , ox. • SW < � .t yJ/ •' ' 4; f � m ilk: .--..- —T. -:'N‘ .: . 1 i iTiT ilei. i it PlOwitsAh, Pt .4 IN s 4-.) I'N v.OS "-'"Ile, i .... It. 1 . ----)ftweit-„,_ ...,..,----,. ..:' 1 --_.__ I 1 7./iiitpt /./,.• . fitt..tild.___I •. II ArtlYlat D. '!..30e r p • . . — \///// 4-...... - - a *1 v./.AiligiippOr AL , v.A..4.$4.4. .. -.,‘,...o 11.1,,,,*.N.....7. .0117.1.- i —------- • „,.. ... . ... --.... #1". Lefkil?at°.44 ‘frii ft,Vi'i.''. . i rn .. ." ••• • li• at #',Jae:0 4 ,..-- , �-r /.p i►rc:n,-e1, to+ �/ t 73 7 .. .„.....7„........ , 4100. "-- `I •7� n I • • I R-1 - 4 • K .. • F UD-0371- Ps1 , NW 3 7.13 , / . , - , l • 1 , \A ' _ IM— o > z D. i • J • ,\ cf., I I' , .i ' ''i • 1 2 \ �I F ��- .4 0 i �. 1 '1 I A I _.��";_ —6 .":4- ._. ...ten-ril ' NACHES CENTER . ' 14?1 SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-056-88 . N • • • APPLICANT RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA + 10 ACRES • • PRINCIPAL ACCESS NACHES AVENUE S.W. & POWELL AVENUE S.W. , • EXISTING ZONING 0-P, OFFICE PARK . EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF THREE (3) OFFICE BUILDINGS. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION. COMMENTS LOCATED AT THE 600 BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE S.W. • . . Cl) W_J.r---- 137'-2' , . • I 224'-10' I Z 77'-9' 69'-9' 77'-9' . 69'-4' 1, 77'-9' / cc a Brick Panel Mechanical Screen —Concrete Panel Tinted Glass W E 1 I I l - 1 1 1 1 1 I I-- V z c\, --- 9 ' g- iriV - z , f�Tl W Reflective Glass--I v Main Entry = Z C.) N oz_a ' BLDG.1 EAST ELEVATION BLDG.1 SOUTH ELEVATION =W Lij Z t— CC aft` 224,10'• I-- 137,2' .1. v's'•:. 69.5' S7-0I. 57'_0' I 69'-6' 69'-9' 7T-9' - "SS4` - Fr J' No DESCABRIOM OM I I I I I I I I I I _ E- - -` - =1011.1MIMIM � _ r Th ''. i ) 1 (Th. y 'L.±:-.;c=iiil 111►1111uu11111i111cu1u111111V1 `2 mummmnrannnn�niamnunra� ...... -_3 Secondary Entry—' Secondary Entry— _� MIIIMMIMIl —Moilil BLDG.1 NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.1 WEST ELEVATION == -- MillIIIIMIINIMI MliiMMIMEINIIIII NACHES CENTER BLDG.1IONS IM ue,"'"°.� RENTONTHE ,WASHINGTONSCHUMAN COMPANIES ‘ fiagvAMAI OCWILBIAIO • . - ELEVATIONS BLDG.1 - • JOB NO.66014 SHUT No(1 mzmom. 8 of 9 T 120' �. j 310• as' j 128' N — a BLDG.2 WEST ELEVATION BLDG.2 SOUTH ELEVATION WCC n CL 310' 120' F- 0 145' / 90' Z 2 O I _ fi V a Z . .. .1. .: rirr_li =1i n [ Cn M Q WW U .� BLDG.2 NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.2 EAST ELEVATION I N Z BUILDING 2 Q W Z 1- cc Painted Tilt Up Concrete Panel— Tinted Glass —Reflective Glass 128 270' }. Nam'. ct . -lf--R,y 0-n�1 n nau •■ Lry imr.j—__—• L—Ii=4 • MO DESCRIPTION DATE•• ye..-...a._Qomu.Wee BLDG. 3 WEST ELEVATION Entry(typ.)J BLDG. 3 SOUTH ELEVATION 272 y_ , 55 �_ - I N. Tl'Tl n 1 17 'mil 11 .11; =, BLDG.3 NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.3 EAST ELEVATION BUILDING 3 NACHES CENTER ELEVATIONS Y" THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES BLDGS.2&3 .., RENTON,WASHINGTON _ ELEVATIONS BLDGS.2&3 .roe MO 88014 SHEET No o - CITE .to.ao.t, +. D .•Ci. 9 of 9.. N. PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND \ \ O 1 htW-i F&-N.j.�, o.+ Hr.-w.r1F�'u-. P 'fi c a, •xrc� Rom, �,ry tr,ttas•-f owrr/ � ,. ,\ Z91'..L 'Xs l(M�.k-i aJ.+G-CII�T'� 1,FkJ''r'glHq �./../G-NWa 2{ tit Fla•/EK1HU Rom,.,..: .oy Fia se:1-1,--7;,, // ry':::Z rr:r. \ cones-fG /i .., FG6, a Rw ram.,fPt'➢.le.�P.v*,-flr+E; W CIOT2>(, cry 1 hEa-4 >. g-id I..rr. A • a-a. e-aa-c4,r1 •acrad.r-Wtctnzi+Uu+ r r o..i7v •a9r4-iVy fsTiMB Q \ isoLEaS, {v,v«rc,,fry.c f,. our,w a+e, Ff~ro-j CC a -'4i$4 T,PA f ?.sd.:vr;hart (FE�??-I ' LU a c1[o.Nr/ uwf•�1a�•ak ;�-i',W«rtnniu�JiNr�, /pui•{.•r.{�r, L O y� ,\ \ .n/I evl..E C.a,v of- /0Ta 0 18"ou •1 % i - AA\ � [-n lo•.4I, ahv oG vJ aa'++tertt rri -iv.., 6 �+s' fe�rlo Z O liffilannaw 4o ,0l'* 0v I Grw� yam. W LJ r so-.I�wre.�..-�v ,i-- ..\` ,7,,,,g~. Ca4-Yv -va2'6-f.Ms'H(..,.-t-( ••✓e!.i rV'r,F nFti?r-, U z 1 ,• No 1zJ V/ Q v +O �\, .1 !)..*k- -fJrffMi f✓+#T rytra.o+n 1 P.e .Nh6«W N W I A , rRowd �rw 1 U = z as N EY 1B ya w ,"''0 ,r AO III r iiii AA? yJ,I I ti gs c/..w�.....� Z I— CC _ DWI t' C A 4 I �e�:A. •, A�� Jo �^ y a. B R ii�, I!lry..rr��I I f� Sri t /.u•s� I - +.4'.. PTrwo, -rw_" a= 'iL s \ kit a:A \raC A .wkn o+c r..l 'LrE � ���� e.' ."-14F 1 I I i' 111��.�. �C�T?, I IV. �Gr;I r/ � � ��I` ctH Orya •'4'. ) OT 4,0 ,c 1 �� / _ ""'°'.,,M .� • _ - t 40 raq ../aq ✓-..i..�ibiim a1. _`Eg*.w+Fi+.Ht.r; ,I.ro, '....a �». 2 •IT 1i� ` / � ekT: toll-i.'ke) �yf,,t'y. 'ic'I .ia-:11 , \ 1 -.\ • /1 c.e..-4, ei5,"7.4 ,•,,,,,,,, r - ••••/MR . E �� r .....:.4< % i RY� yRjbi4, ` rn°As i v,/, l .I illi`.r -� _ 81 �• " Ak.ai t . -..4 `'RJ M I a- '—.•e«�.r,,,...a �(.i� �:. L; 4. •.- ,`�_``` 1``i!— .� „' ►+.»--s !IL" �� r 7' ,� �r _ f�l. .M.L.. M'4 I„ �G .}�; rn; "1' S•!- � `_'� III a - � tl b'a 8"iTy1 ^ w r \\ • •.'��/ • gl- ft* 5 ' +_�� � �, i/ �r c\��%�•- `- . !, - ' .. > L!.I i' I__I r I i_I_I tc I I _=aur ` ' __,.... ' ��P s ' T��._ _ -_ _ � �e�sMR' I .� �� ,. _ N13,1 ' _ __ ' • NBS oys•w ets> 1 AL t• I '.\/ / i' ACCESS G MANAGE BWALEY� E U:1T1N0 A eeM U E I I }�} '� „y„d"T� " ;/,.;.-. ^✓J Fri:X /f�.=G y' y ACCESS L1AINTENANCE EASEMENT ,\ t I I Ei' (/'Jr fH 30 OF OLE6 G'S F+SFME OA•ATV N F I I / I 11 a' / NO OESC«IPTION GATE I I 1 r Ek6TM0 BU N EDC ri EkISTMO BlRE1 Dr I I Fa spa r aI 11._ LEGEND NACHES CENTER �E� The o PAT NIniTS Mitchell LANDSCAPE PLAN Ipror AbNa. THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES Nelson �a zo CEroup a p i. I50 100 „ � RENTON,WASHINGTON Incorporated AA.AA 001011.15.0200 Lam.,Arrharatue Uzi.OrAgn LANDSCAPE PLAN m s nAn.BmkrNr i um JOB N0 88014 SNEET PC,c8 CEIZEDM 7 of 9 -TABULATION- , \ SITE AREA V135,600 S.F. --- -- - - --- ----I-- BUILDINGAREA x118,000 SF , „\ VICINITY MAP OF ADJACENT USES t c� BUILDING FOOTPRINT x71,398 SF. `v` rT ti COVERAGE .27% • WETLAND UNADOPTED 1.,t SITE COVERAGE x16% WETLAND EXTENSION OF.. -1, PARKING • NACNES AVE '-`- ^TM:...ry BURUry STANDARD =J225TALL5 \ ; '.T` ` :Y iA. t .., G GryM CONPACT =2,T STALLS("AST%) I+'",-,-.._-....^',H ✓ Rry NAIBIMJYP :e sTAus '.NACHFSICENTEfl1,i3 Tt=-"."�,_-RAIL 5 .„ v'yt(^ ROq TOTAL .0 TALLS \�, ,'`i:•:-." ':Y;:•'� `o -r.'°'c_Tje,. tr200 S.F.BASED ON (�.I b+� e. fit te -7,...o- a+ - -'01 A E WITHIN•-.. _ ... v.. 02%EFF URGENCY..IR " r'�•T i®,00 y WITHIN Z \� • _ _i, _ I'. ��� ,oD YEAR FLooDPuw VICINITY MAP al 1.1 i!! .�;A------ ry. =c'` NORTH SCALE Cry ¢ E E O tee\ iJ ' `t_ Iwo.a .,,�r w— T 'T oty �'y` _ �' UNADOPTED a •�enr♦c':7t,c �.,.. � '�iwml j Ewmw V O0 .C;.o(v.irrd \ \ ©r{.1�:'-''n-�'T�;`vc a &ORFC ATE �-" m` WETLAND �:\,\ er'� 1� AMMEE .. . �ii ' V Q z • • .,_ •�} Q III Ur I N z1\ I \ ¢�EeU L�L',.E /5 ia �wuF \\ ` \\�.r T1M/ I MrES-OPE EMU', `•� MtRwoPw FL4 aTW' �,., MIN �- 0 O • \ I I�'•rg� M 0K 1S'0- JS0.00 `\ ~ FY'(LiTOr+YD '_Moms. T \ _ Si SLws i uJ sE =-- M 1'�11 'I .' Lid,_-, \' \/e ` I.IN, " -� III ♦ W Drt -L'_ Y.uD LEGEND. ¢ e� ¢e _;��'T'�D o TREES TO BE REYV.'ED \i'll c - 1 t i�II \. � ..; - / •TREES TO BE PRESERVED NORTH )Y • % ,/ - ,/,xrl-♦•♦.•-M ®PATH LIGHTS ' .E , '; I Pi I t h `��-;. -_ G i' t�BICYCLE RACI( 9 RENGI _2fs I: sa%. ?� II \��• I c /I\ 'T� I I •I • / \- \ ATM,• I nl _• ryD o-•EXISTND STREET IJGHT ( _ q L•I i V-\� \Rryggrta O EXISTe FNE HYDRANT +t. II•I L(G( I = sys• (�t ss'-s•n "�s' 15s. ' -'��� - \ - r-�04D rRAor pOPOSED LT E MYDP NT II �y _ 80. —3 ,e5' OI -�\�` �I �` I(m S s'e^ =xaooDsf.' /&�:�' ��! • .\`� D �� IIf - 1 — a' I ``����\. _= ��.c-oeTec sE�ro 'y I lu 4w -I :cT.00D SF. io`ucv. t ,ze nr t�� .-I- .0 - _ ? _` .cm u.,.n..v t-,,) .-D¢E.-ate v. I ; `!Y !—i .r :��1 FF 3 --'tom\. IJ • ' r=�.� c =23.000 sf. � II i I J II 2 �Ip■JV��.L V. F n, //�� ^3'•� •;\\ '1�_ • i•. :,}w '_ _ . - _.-- ♦ 1 �I I v A� -. :/,- SIC t.'I IT�., 3 // \ �� \ ii'�^ •—•�I �� I i I I .^' 1 1 i�I 1 bi i . I,LLI Is +i, — .� — .. I `�. \..�1 �� i' �5moo -=—� � �" I 7-I t =!'i 111:1 I:I!Ill' 1 ill I I°. E% -,E -�. �_ i 'T� �\ _^{i—i ... ••' 1--: I \T•'�'[ `� ....nr ISITTIM.B^�-•.��•• • �•a�`••� _ f77:--;-im- OFlD� \•t - - � EXISTING MANAGE SWALE- EYISTMG 20•EI:SBBIT LIE_ 4- •' ^!-� •j'- ai��ll \\ -''- - - I \' \ - fy' 0.CCE554AwTENAHCE EASEYENT� JO'PWELVIEL TRANSPOl1TATM)N��\ _ I 1..^• � � <, �_ J \ �� I rn _.,.. „,.u„SLLT,e.II 1tE I cli I'. "~-•� -••A'�.-c'LL�:+-.,>-.a ;\.S':w 4.¢B(:J' 6)� �tl V NLu9N-D(rv-Ezi y0,. 00.AND GAS EASEMENT 6[KT'.6 D¢♦.VlTE ', - - i ..tD'WILANV.tL\EvE G'.3��$ I ,�I t I _ - AN"SD'i... NO. DATE IY.Ak,,w,,,,SIty N.)-I-9 J:'I ld EXISTNG BULLNG MUMS BUILDING E. I IZ < al : ;� B �zI W �� NACHES CENTER • .' //— JID SITE PLAN DRAINAGE SWALE . WIs THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES • f W;� EYISTNC BUL3NIIG(n1` gl _ 1;U j._ "'` = G ;,� lso '00 Inn ;��s,.,, RENTON.WASHINGTON \ `PROPOSED GRADE / -V SITE PLAN P EXISTING GRADE / SITE SECTION A vso" `,, ,+ - JOB MO.0801. SHEET NO OF •,, 0.1. ' of 9 M'' CMECK:Pv. CI CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT•DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor September 8, 1988 Mr. David Schuman Rivertech Associates 411 University Street Seattle, Washington 98101 RE: Rivertech Associates File Nos. ECF-056-87, SA-056-88, SM-056-88 Dear Mr. Schuman: This letter is to clarify any confusion which may have resulted from a letter you recently received from our office informing you that the comment period had ended for the Determination of Non-Significance issued for the above project. The letter sent to you, in addition to stating that the comment period had ended, also stated that there were no comments. We sent the notice before the appeal period ended on September 6, 1988. As we discussed yesterday, comments were received on Tuesday. These comments, together with the issued Determination, will be taken to the Environmental Review Committee meeting on September 14th for their review. The appeal period will be readvertised once the Committee reaches a decision on the whether or not the Determination will be revised. At such time a letter will be sent to you regarding the Committee's decision. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 Mr. David Schuman • Rivertech Associates September 8, 1988 Page 2 If you have any questions, please call me or Jeanette Samek- McKague at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:JSM:mjp cc: Mr. Robert Sieh Edwards & Barbeiri Attorneys At Law 6501 Columbia Center 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 t 4 LAW OFFICES OF MALCOLM L.EDWARDS EDWARDS AND BARBIERI 6501 COLUMBIA CENTER RICHARD L. BARBIERI 701 FIFTH AVENUE ROBERT G.SIEH A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 CHARLES K.WIGGINS TELEPHONE 624-0974 JOHN W. HATHAWAY FAX 624-0809 CATHERINE WRIGHT SMITH AREA CODE 206 HOWARD M.GOODFRIEND September 7 , 1988 iPC%C a'ciGF;fcio- Ci (OF RErONµ iIO l4ENi SEP Donald K. Erickson, AICP 9 198� Zoning Administrator ;fir; lt City of Renton `' l� K 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Rivertech Associates File Nos. ECF-056-88 , SA-056-88, SM-056-88 Dear Mr . Erickson : Thank you for sending me a copy of your September 2, 1988 letter to Mr . Schuman with regard to the above-referenced applications . Your letter to Mr . Schuman indicated that the comment period for the Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the above-referenced project had already ended on September 2, 1988 . It is my understanding that Seattle Audubon and Shelley Anderson submitted comments on September 6 , 1988 . Enclosed are additional copies of your August 19 , 1988 letter to me and the City of Renton Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the above referenced applications . On page-3 of your August 19 , 1988 letter , you say: Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than use the Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies , jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee ' s decision . The comment period will end September 6 , 1988 . Page 1 of the Determination of Non-Sigificance states, in part: Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen ( 15 ) da'ys from August 22 , 1988 . Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5 :00 p.m. , September 6 , 1988 , in order to be considered. Donald K. Erickson, AICP September 7 , 1988 Page 2 We trust that the comments received on September 6, 1988 will be considered because they were received by 5 :00 p.m. as stated in your August 19 , 1988 letter and in the Determination of Non-Significance. Additionally, we note that your letter to Mr . Schuman was dated September 2, 1988 , less than fifteen ( 15 ) days from August 22, 1988 . Thank you again for sending us copies of the correspon- dence . As you know, we are very interested in the preservation and enhancement of the Black River ecosystem and associated heron rookery. Very truly yours, `=,) Robert G. Sieh RGS: gc Enclosure - mETRD Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 :r.) SEPT- 1988 September 6, 1988 pppp���a Mu f1. / i aG F Mr. Ronald G. Nelson, Director City of Renton Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA. 98055 Determination of Non-Significance File No. SA-056-88. Rivertech Associates Dear Mr. Nelson: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsb •, _ _. Ji OSeaidc Audubon .b 33ocielp n-A-3 L:V „L;1;;JG/ZCIN!NG DEP T b Washington Nonprofit Corporation 619 Joshua Green Building• Seattle, WA 98101 •206/622-6695 September 6 , 1988 Mr . Donald J . Erickson Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton , WA 98055 Dear Mr. Erickson: We concur with the comments of Shelley Anderson submitted today regarding River.tech Associates Site Plan . It is obvious that the available habitat for herons and migra tory waterfowl is diminishing rapidly, especially in the Green River valley. The exact number of herons 'using this site for nesting is only estimated. We urge you to isspera determination of signific nce in this matter so that the proponent can further evaluate t matter and supply more accurate data() If this project is approved then appropriate mitigation measures must be assured , . asper the recommendations of Shelley Anderson . I have attached a copy of a 1988 report by Marty Murphy as it appeared in Western Birds for your reference. Sincerely, (_5:( Gerald Adams Vice President , Conservation ., /, .• • ---.0 42 y • J' , ‘ ! - (7,,--- i-c1-4 ---1-e-1-,7-v-3--e i 7----•'---k"'0 i r•_,...--a :3-.77 F.,,,-;,-7,...42-3.,,,•—w . -3 777-71-7" _ii, ,,,7. .7.--,:c _.„,,_47 -42--2.2-?-. -:2-2/4 ??9.-- _7/7-/-2•-• ri--1-??,;-,-- (---7-• --i----?-0..L:z. ri.772 rd71:-'--). --1-4—.4-Y1-"'-)-(rX 2 • . / . i --1--,-;----i--_,J,,,i) --x)---,--27=2--rd 47-2--,:,,fb.--- ,•?7-21 z,.-71-2-p../.. ---g_, ri fr •/ , 4-277 / 7.-77.7 ?-..7-7--,2 r . / ,P,_g -E /--Y.' •-?72 - -d----), c,v • --/ 7 ,- 1 -- _"--- ---963t \ (1,;.:y-,-/--i, i 7,--- . •7-73-.1i73/ ''/.2.-iir-Y 7-77!lir) ' )) rig 1'22X 7r--.‘-' •'1'7. linc-1, / s., /7-2- ,7 - . fi -44§ kor, • • : 1 1 '1 -Ilir".‘ s..,,jelir Amismimur „ i ri-,!'t [ q .9 '._1 (_••(.1 --- 14.011\1FRI NOTES STATUS OF GREAT BLUE HERON COLONIES IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON MARTY MURPHY, Box 3070, Half Moon Bay, California 94019 The Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodics)has been common in western Washington throughout recorded history (Jewett et al. 1953). Shipe and Scott (198]) surveyed Great Blue Heron colonies in King County for the Washington Department of Wildlife. In 1983 the Department resurveyed three of the colonies noted by Shipe and Scott. In this paper I update information on Great Blue Heron colonies in this area. Since 198], four of the six colonies reported by Shipe and Scott have been abandoned,but six new ones have been reported and confirmed (Table 1).Most heron colonies in King County are now threatened by proposed commercial developments. The Great Blue Heron is considered a species with special concerns on the national level(Tate and Tate 1982),and the state of Washington has designated the Great Blue Heron a species of special concern and has established guidelines for management of colonies. Many of the herons'feeding grounds are threatened also.The largest lakes in King County are Lake Washington and Lake Sammamish. Around the former only six wetlands remain,and some of these are threatened by development.The two wetlands on Lake Sammamish are both within parks.According to the Puget Sound Water Quality Authority(1987),approximately 14,000 acres of wetland around Puget Sound have been converted to other uses by diking and filling.Fifty percent of the wetlands along streams have been converted to pastures.Along the floodplains of six major rivers more than 150,000 acres have yielded to flood control diking, agriculture, and other development. Known since 1955,the Black Diamond colony suffered from shooting up to 1981. Since then the surrounding area has been developed extensively.I saw no herons during my two visits to the site in 1986 and 1987. The eight-nest Black River rookery in Renton is on an island within ponds created by the Soil Conservation Service for flood control.Developers proposed an office park for the site but failed to note the presence of the colony in their proposal.On 18 February 1987,at a time of pre-nesting and territorial activity of the herons,they cut a riparian forest just north of the colony in an area designated by the city of Renton as a conservancy zone.The U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service,Washington Department of Ecology, and Washington Department of Wildlife ordered the work stopped until a hearing examiner could review the project's effects on the herons and other wildlife.The herons returned •i to the area on 20 February,occupied seven nests,and fledged an average of two young per nest between 10 and 20 June, later than at the Sammamish and Yarrow Bay colonies. I could not locate the Crystal Lake colony in May and June 1986 and presume it to be abandoned.On 11 June a highway was being cut through the forest and a housing development was in progress. Park biologists discovered two heron nests in Discovery Park,Seattle,in 1986.This colony may grow because it is well protected within the park and trees are abundant. Perhaps herons from the recently abandoned Pigeon Point rookery about 2 km southwest will attempt to nest here. Although development surrounds the Dumas Bay colony on three sides,the colony lies partly within Dumas Bay County Park,within which it is protected by fencing.The dense undergrowth beneath the colony and the vigilance of local residents also protect it. The colony discovered in 1984 at Jensen's Cove, Lake Sammamish State Park,is still growing but faces problems.A public boat launch lies within 100 m of the rookery, and use of the launch has tripled since 1985.Water skiing and fast boats create waves that erode the shoreline and steepen the banks on which fledgling herons forage. In Western Birds 19:37.40, 1988 37 r • t' Table 1 Great Blue Heron Colonies, King County, Washington 00 Times site Number of nests visited during Location this study 1981' 1983' 1984 1985 1986 1987 Supporting trees Black Diamond, Grass Lake 2 (1986) 8 — — — 0 0 Red Alder (Alnus rubro) Black River, Renton 27 (1986-87) — — — — 8 8' Black Cottonwood (Populus trichocarpo) Crystal Lake, Woodinville 2 (1986) 22 0 — — 0 Douglas Fir (Pseudolsuga menziesii) Discovery Park, Seattle 1 (1987) — — 2 2 Douglas Fir 3 (1986-87) 24 30 46° 29 29 Red Alder Dumas Bay, Fede Slatel Way 7 14 21 29 Black Cottonwood LakeIsland Sammamish Park, Issaquah —19 (1984-87) — — — — — — Unknown Maury Island — Peasley Canyon, Auburn 3 (1986-87) 15 10 14° —5 3 11 11 1 Red Alder Douglas Fir z Phantom Lake, Bellevue 4 (1986-87) — 0 Pigeon Point, Seattle 1 (1986) — — 16°" — 16 0 Black Cottonwood --t rn Se 1 (1986) 4 0 Black Cottonwood rn Weowna County Park, Burien 2 (1986) 4 — — — 0 — Douglas Fir Yarrow ay.Co i Park, Bellevue 17 (1986-87) — — — 2' 6 6 Black Cottonwood Yarrow Bay, Kirkland •Data from Shipe and Scott (1981). 'Data from aerial survey conducted by Washington Department of Wildlife. •Only seven nests actually occupied. 'Data from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. •Data from Harold Ritland (pers.comm.) • NOTES nearby Issaquah approximately 405 ha of wetlands and open fields are now shopping centers and freeway. Destruction of riparian growth along Issaquah Creek, within 10 m of the colony, restricts foraging habitat near the colony to the state park. I made no attempt to observe the colony at Maury Island. accessible only by boat. The island was logged extensively in 19S1, and no nests were observed there during the aerial survey of 1983. The Peasley Canyon colony lies on a ridge, owned partly by a developer, above a receding marsh at the junctions of state highways 18 and 167. A shopping center that would cover a portion of the fields and wetlands adjacent to the colony has been proposed. Snohomish County x3 4 i 13 sg Lake Sammamish v 12X a ro X o tj i 6 X9 10 N 0 c a. xll 12 King County x7 Maury Island may g 5 ay QJ ■ 8 xl Pierce County Figure 1.Locations of Great Blue Heron colonies in King County,Washington. 1,Black Diamond;2, Black River;3,Crystal Lake;4,Discovery Park;5, Dumas Bay County Park;6,Lake Sammamish County Park;7,Maury Island;8,Peasley Canyon;9,Phan- tom Lake; 10, Pigeon Point; 11, Seahurst County Park; 12,Weowna County Park; 13, Yarrow Bay. Squares, active colonies; crosses, abandoned colonies. 39 I) NOTES At Phantom Lake, herons originally nested near a boat-launching area, according to long-time lake residents. In 1985 they moved to an approximately 2-ha stand of Douglas fir,where they nested again in 1986.Cutting of cattails in the herons'feeding area,harassment by crows,and high winds are probable causes of abandonment in 1987. Located high on a bluff above the industrialized Duwamish Waterway,the Pigeon Point colony encompassed 16 nests in 1986 but was deserted in 1987 (Stephen Penland pers. comm.),possibly as a result of bulldozing too near the colony or frequent blasting for a tunnel within 1 km of it.Seventy-six residences and improved access roads are being built within 100 m of the rookery,in contravention of the Washington Department of Wildlife's recommendation of a minimum buffer of 200 m between development and heron colonies. I saw no evidence of a heron colony when I investigated the site at Seahurst County Park on 1 March 1986.Bluffs once well vegetated with Douglas firs and cottonwoods were bare,and new homes had been placed nearby.The parking lot has been enlarged since 1981, increasing human use of the beach. I noted no heron nests at Weowna County Park in May 1986.A large new housing development had been placed at the southeastern border of the park.In 1987 cutting of trails through the park resulted in the loss of many trees, further diminishing the possibility of the herons'return. Since this colony is only about 1 km from the Lake Sammamish colony the herons at Weowna County Park may have moved to Lake Sammamish. The Yarrow Bay rookery consists of six nests in a single Black Cottonwood in an approximately 25-ha wetland owned by the city of Kirkland.A condominium lies only 50 m east of the colony. In King County Great Blue Herons fledge between 15 and 30 June.All appear to winter locally, though they disperse from the colonies between late August and October. Some may go to Padilla Bay, Skagit County, where I counted 270 at low tide on 16 August • 1986.Some of these undoubtedly came from the two large colonies in Skagit County,on the Swinomish Channel,south of March Point and east of Anacortes (80 nests in 1987), and on Samish Island, northeast of Anacortes (340 nests in 1987,Toby Michelena pers. comm.). Clearly,further monitoring of Great Blue Heron colonies in Washington state is in order.At present,species of"special concern"receive a minimum of attention during the process of environmental impact review. Extirpation of the heron from King County becomes more probable with continued rapid development not only of King County but of the entire Puget Sound region. I thank Stephen Penland,Kelly McAllister, Bob Zeigler, and Susan Tank,Washington Department of Wildlife, and Jim Likes, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, for their encouragement and advice, Greg Butcher, Jim Lowe, and Helen Pratt for sharing their data, my husband Tom Murphy for his interest and assistance, and Dennis Paulson and Philip Unitt for their help with the manuscript. LITERATURE CITED Jewett,S.G.,Taylor,W.P.,Shaw,W.T.,and Aldrich,J.W..1953.Birds of Washington State. Univ. Wash. Press, Seattle. Puget Sound Water Quality Authority.1986.Habitat and wetlands protection.Issue paper. Puget Sound Water Quality Authority,Seattle. Shipe,S.J.,and Scott,W.W. 1981.Great Blue Heron in King County,Washington. Washington Game Department Non-game Program, Olympia. Tate,J.,Jr., and Tate, D.J. 1981.The Blue List for 1982.Am. Birds 36:126-135. Accepted 5 March 1988 40 _AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Audrey Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six(6) times a week.That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition , Renton Edition x , Auburn Edition , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Public Notice was published on September 6 , 1988. R31 19 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 2 2...4 0 • Subscribed and sworn to before me is 16 h day of Sept 1988 Not Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 f I Public Notice Public• Notice NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, - - DETERMINATION Renton,Washington.An appeal must stato ENVIRONMENTAL clearly, In writing, why the Determination REVIEW COMMITTEE should be revised ar' must boaccompa- RENTON,WASHINGTON nied by a non-refunds?,.: : filing fco. The Environmental Review Committee Published in the V,,tile•, :).:,,lews Sept. (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- 6,1988.R3135 Acct:#510":' , Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- ect s • RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three buildings:a 3 story office building of 67,000 sq.ft. and 2 one-story office/R&D buildings with 28,000 sq.ft.and 23,000 sq.ft. respective- ly. Located at the 600 block of Naches Avenue S.W.SA-056-88,ECF-056-88. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 p.m. on September 20, 1988. Any appeal of this decis.v.; may ' be made to the City's Hearing,EA.',Mar. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) : RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three buildings: a 3 story office building of 67, 000 sq. ft. and 2 one- story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft. and 23 , 000 sq. ft. respectively. Located at the 600 block of Naches Avenue S.W. SA-056- 88, ECf-056-88 . Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5: 00 p.m. on September 22, 1988. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. Published: September a, 1988 - • r7cv oiNTc, • • Ai Ts R U 6 rEc • .OF ic (_, Ec.t ( c_ Dik) 6- S). - 05- Co - S8 —ride rotlx)WWG- •Coictin46W73 ARE. boe6, cr6D TO k3c).- H loik) 6- •(A) A-7- 12 (2(AA ( . 1fry s 7-"' A A) 6- -r 1-f ' v•IT-T-7L in./ ivn 6-edoo.)771--1 oFe. 6,\I-TrW • 3\) 1 (ZPW\AelkYINL, LiAcLos FOC-LOW f TH E Acc - ss OrH &AIL. wGs T _APP • 90 LAs_EIL16_T_LckKla42 . • peo Po Oir:5" M&_•ELES s uD( f lsc)-0 .10 • eteom- . 0 FD C APT) t S t ).C-T• -F ,t_ Tt-{Ee_ PO C•LuTici / \3 FO-T- AivCE ,S(-inu 14A a 14e-A0 ¶ AP ( C •TDAeat. -- ies 1Np ›cr- _,M,s-i0 • -rp-Lt_ • • F-1- 1 t 5 e_FoeL,6- . . Ac_nut-T-Et Fe4 M TH-6 146e0A • B 5 E_ -r-t-t6sE Co. S AKYD T_K-6.71c1S '; • • • FI,Dv 1 1 C� 0 F N E'2o • K) & -Nv\. jC bcc I S I O _ = (_111_ D D -OFF H-o (A_ D se Reg Lk Aav O I c WATER ().)AL -Es eA s� I) _��i t NI COO-Ten L �i--M s au.) G a f k O TP\ b"Scrt TC sF /6\N cD s-fib A _ Z:=KK LC L/\ T) NOD MIST tf`V1 Pow T A1 )l/ I I H-8 Fl f&H T • t-l-A-s AL iR Qcc_ (K R • G _SRC- Teo-pa LD. - r> V)-6 J s S ( i t�� S ��G ���t� t7 s I io PA TICou4e. rJIL-DLt H NT�4T'- P f oo (<ey /,vD 51tV3L,I11t10J hw -yn uda-77v g?_jt -Y797) • Jr? • c:2- • d L (Y) _1-9 7*C7 .1 ICSYNti PLUki sry )Thn cj -r)c) 9 i\v4±C1r9v\) ncN (2_2J- 9,y c4, çJLT vvo-, ‘ __Lvc•0 Q_Di 7-?V 9-H_L d 91A)0_ Nt 9 ) cr-mo( -) (b-3 (.0 Q-roc7)45 d,fyv QQ H H '73c-ML • p\v,0 vo- c13. , 9AIL I vs c)Q. •- -17n1-/-- CLM: )-)__\.:1_0 cit11)0?M5 9141 d()-J- —1 )Q) Q.) ) 7-1 fl/1-7 9 S--)c-)14-1 )1 C\) --tkr94s7q cY)(2 ou_vp --31G) Jo \AA-9_as) 5 o-)9 30 _L---ava --9 (* 1-)• Qd_ ao C.1197-) c2)_ Mcn----\) q -? • 1 ) d Tig7a5,:tArF?-YY-C)) c-INd tr)- 1\-c-)-N9 - n 926_1: clic; . lallr 5ie. .c3i , - a. or! c) • v„bp ������ Z Tie L melee 01 A) ! 1 I fkis E Sic 2 eau ND -- 1N�� HA -4•T rs 6 v—ia o _c, 6F yff r r oc /ors //J .( ivc_. 5R LL-J1 mao E ,s 0 A/ Z Sp `i g e o e✓1.(`r2y 1i Christine Gregoire t* i [#xx ' } Director y�isso ,oy0 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000 September 2 , 1988 Mr. Don Erickson r- , 1968' City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South /7..t7RlilVv UE7 . Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Erickson: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for Naches Center, an office complex pro- posed by Rivertech Associates. We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments. 1. The proposed project is part of a major complex proposed as the Black River Corporate Park, which we have commented on previously. Our comments were submitted at a public hearing for the grading permit in March, 1987 . Comments were also submitted on the DNS for the Black River Corporate Park fill- ing and grading permit (May 13, 1987) ; on development propos- als by First City, November 1987 and August 16, 1988 ; and other parts of the Black River Corporate Park project (south of the Forebay Pond) . Ms. Mary Burg of Ecology's Wetlands Section determined that the entire site, including the area of the proposed Naches Center, is a wetland and associated with the Black River/P-1 Pond (letter of April 27, 1987) . The checklist makes no ref- erence to the fact that it has a wetland which has been par- tially filled. In fact, portions of the site are still in a natural wetland state, and fill could be removed from the site to restore it to its natural condition. 2 . The proposal would be constructed on fill which was placed without benefit of a shoreline permit. Construction on that fill will not be allowed until resolution of the various issues that surround the fill placement are resolved. This includes, but is not limited to, an existing stop work order by Ecology placed March 11, 1987 ; designation of wetlands which existed on the site before filling and which extend over the rest of the Black River site; mitigation for fill placed in wetlands on this site and south of the current proposal, east of Naches; appropriate uses and development of 3 Letter to Mr. Erickson September 2 , 1988 Page 2 wetlands in this area, since this was a wetland until filled; and consistency of the proposal with the Renton Shoreline Master Program and the Shoreline Management Act, including policies and regulations relating to associated wetlands. It would seem to be somewhat difficult for the proposal to proceed with the Ecology stop work order in place on this site. 3 . The DNS seems to neglect, if not plainly ignore, past comments on the part of our agency, as well as other state and federal agencies and local groups, that any plan for the Black River site be formulated in a comprehensive manner and take into account the various resources and constraints on the site. Many parties, including ourselves, have strongly suggested that a supplemental EIS be done to include such new factors as the heron rookery, new techniques of wetland pro- tection, and the presence of an associated wetland, all of which have not been fully analyzed in a SEPA document. This proposal is clearly piecemeal development and a supple- mental EIS, or a new EIS, should be done for any portion of the Black River site, whether under the name Rivertech, First City Equities, First City Development, or any other name. 4 . Any proposed shoreline designation of the wetland on the site (before filling) and the wetland to the north of the proposal must be consistent with WAC 173-16, which calls for an inventory of all on site resources, including wetlands. The proposal must show that it meets the criteria for land- fill , commercial, roads and railroads, unique and fragile ar- eas, and others contained in the Renton Shoreline Master Pro- gram. For example, landfill may only be allowed in certain specific circumstances or by approval of the Renton Hearing Examiner. In summary, we believe the DNS is inadequate. It does not address in detail any mitigation or protection to the exist- ing and previously existing resources, including the wetland and the heron rookery. In addition, the DNS does not ac- knowledge prior comments by agencies and individuals. The project also does not appear to be consistent with the Renton Shoreline Master Program, especially protection of unique and fragile areas. Perhaps most critical , it constitutes piece- meal development. Letter to Mr. Erickson September 2, 1988 Page 3 We suggest the applicant and the city consider what develop- ment is appropriate for the entire site surrounding the Forebay/P-1 pond, and do comprehensive analysis before pro- ceeding with such a fragmented approach. We remind the City that the wetland was identified in the City of Renton Wetlands Study of 1981 as Renton's number one priority wetland for protection. If you have any questions, please call Ms. Terra Prodan of the Shorelands Program at (206) 438-7106. Sincerely, --)6/4 -10dIL Barbara J. Ritchie Environmental Review Section BJR: cc: Linda Rankin, Shorelands Tom Mark, Shorelands Architecture and Planning Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc., Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 ' September 2, 1988 clu r d''a of C i?S\I[ETON Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP '1 E`� � . Zoning Administrator City of Renton CU!LD„NG/ZONING DEPT. 200 Mill Street Renton, WA 98055 RE: Naches Center, Site Plan Approval File: SA 056-88 SM 056-88 ECF 056-88 Comments on ERC conditions City of Renton Letter, August 19, 1988, Request Dear Mr. Erickson: Per your letter of August 19, 1988, we request the committee reconsider the conditions proposed for determination of non—significance. Item 1: The site plan as submitted to the city does, to the greatest extent possible, preserve significant trees and grouping of trees on the site (versus starting with no preserved trees) we planned this site to preserve. as many additional trees as possible, in addition to the trees preserved along the swale are prior to this proposal. Item 2: The applicants landscape architect will work with a botanist, Rex VanWormer and the City of Renton landscape planner to revise plans to include plants that will provide additional food source for small animals and birds. Item 3: Clean fill will be placed on the site and will be approved by Public Works prior to further filling of the site. Please note the western half of the site has already been filled per prior approvals for the ADMAC Building and the only fill to be added to the site will occur on the eastern portion of the site which is substantially removed (distance) from the Heron rookery and can be accessed from Powell versus Naches Avenue. We see no reason to limit the time element for filling this area, as Phase III existing to the south, Naches and Oakesdale were all built during January through April periods with no impact to the Heron rookery. As a matter of fact the Heron rookery has increased in total count. This site and fill areas are well outside any significant setback areas established for the Heron rookery and should not be a condition of approval. Mr. Don Erickson September 2, 1988 Page 2 We believe that your proposed date for restricting filling activities is contrary to the position of the Renton City Council. The only fill will occur on the eastern portion of the site beyond the 600/1000 foot distance imposed for fill activity by the Renton City Council in its September 14, 1987 decision on First City Equities' proposal to the southwest of this property (SP-100-86). The Council 's decision was made after considering extensive testimony given at the hearing as well as in a number of committee meetings. The area proposed for filling is well beyond Naches Avenue. Item 4: The applicant will work with the Police Department and Public Works on road routes within the city prior to hauling any fill. Since we have access from Powell Avenue to the site it is not necessary to use the existing road that runs along the railroad trucks to Monster Road at the east. We question this requirement anyway because the railroad runs cars up and down parallel to the same roadway (which, again, is outside any setback areas defined as acceptable to the Heron rookery). Item 5: Applicant will limit use of construction equipment to the hours of 7 am to 7 pm. We question the validity of time limits on construction activity within a quarter mile of the Heron rookery between January 23 and April 30th. This is excessive in distance and it should be limited to 600 ft. from the Heron rookery as in previous approvals with established buffers around the rockery which currently exists at the perimeter areas around the rookery island. We need to note that the rookery survived and thrived while Oakesdale, Naches and Phase III were simultaneously under construction (at the same time) during these months. This project exists beyond the Naches extension area and the rookery has the entire riparian forest preserve and the P-1 detention pond area for refuse and feeding. Item 6: Per the cities direction a dense row of 6" columnar trees will be placed in the landscaping strip adjacent to Naches and the buffer hedge row design can be changed to a berm area. The caliper of the tree should be left open as 6" caliper trees are not always available in the market. Item 7: A transportation management plan is already established and will be submitted to the city prior to building permit issuance. Leason Pomeroy Northwest, Inc., Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 Mr. Don Erickson. September 2, 1988 Page 3 Item 8: The applicant is allowed by city ordinance to park a ratio of 1/200 sf of net building area. The proposed submittal already parks less than this on the site. 590 stalls are allowed if parking the building area. We have used a 93% occupancy utilization factor of the space to reduce the parking by 43 cars. An additional 70 cars is unreasonable and not required by City ordinance and affects the marketability of the project. The allowed site coverage for this project is 35%, we are currently only proposing 16% site coverage which is substantially less and effectively parks substantially less cars. Item 9: We are extremely concerned with the amounts of the "fair share" traffic improvement costs for the "Grady Way Benefit Area." Under the State Environmental Policy Act, conditions imposed as mitigation must be directly related to documented adverse environmental impact specifically identified in a City Ordinance, plan or regulation adopted by the City Council. We are not aware of any "fair share" program or where specifically, the "Grady Way Benefit Area" is. We believe that this condition is inappropriate. Item 10: Oil water separators will be incorporated per city standards. Item 11: A schedule will be provided for cleaning and maintenance of the storm water system prior. Item 12: Shower and locker room facilities will be provided within the project for employee tenant use. Item 13: Applicant can provide additional seating and table areas in the vicinity of Building 1 & 2 in the Plaza areas. As areas have already been proposed at the eastern end of the site and along the swale area we question the degree of the requirement and whether more is really necessary? Leason Pomeroy Northwest, Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 Mr. Don Erickson September 2, 1988 Page 4 Item 14: Easements already exist along the S.E. portion of this site which is in addition to all the dedication of land, pond and forest areas within the entire park. We question whether additional specific easements are necessary, in particularly when the trails or paths are provided for in this proposal. Respectfully, 4 Roy a A. Berg Pr-sident pal cc: David Schuman Ted Holden, The Mitchell Nelson Group Rex VanWormer Charles Blumenfeld Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 il �<:iiii �'aQ CURT SMITCH Director S L 1889 apv STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 16018 Mill Creek Blvd.. Mill Creek, WA 98012 Tel. (206) 775-1311 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN1 August 31 , 1988 CITY OF RENTON 0 SEP i' 19<<. ,) Environmental Review Committee ,0 c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division-Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: ECF-056-88; RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES; MDNS Dear Mr . Erickson: The Department of Wildlife concurs with the determination for this project . We support the proposed mitigation providing landscape materials which supply food and other benefits to birds and small mammals. A correction needs to be made regarding the timing. Construction activity should not be allowed closer than 1 ,200 feet from any heron nest tree between February 1st and August 15th or until the heron fledglings have left the nest . Sincerely, I , Ton Op a ann Habitat Biologist TO:kh cc: Habitat - Olympia 3 • • ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION • APPLICATION NO. ECF-056-88, SM-056-88 APPLICANT RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES • PROPOSED ACTION FORTO•• THE DEVELOPMENT OF THREEICATION BUILDINGS; AI3ESTORY OFFICEPLANAL BUILDINGOW OF 67,000QN SQ. FT AND 2 QONE STORY OFFICE/R&D BUILDINGS WITH 28,000 GEERAL OCA1ff NsA1463 E1fifi fi'Y. LOCATED AT THE 600 BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE S.W. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE • PROPOSED ACTION DOES ►1 DOES NOT - HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL ><I WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY ' BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER • BY 5:00 P.M., EEPTBPIDER 22, 1988 • • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. CERTIFICATION • I , 6ERK-f L. nor) , HEREBY CERTIFY THA T �j-rTZ,6e-• ) . COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 114kgrr, (3 ) CONSPICUOUS . PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON c'_ig- SR . • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for tpe State of Washington • residing inkri on the I day of sI-LFs?S R t@, ,SIGNED : fy'`s t 1'11 i 7P ZaY ova5 L a . ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-056-88 , SM-056-88 APPLICANT RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF THREE BUILDINGS ; A 3 STORY OFFICE BUILDING OF 67 , 000 SQ. FT AND QQ2 ONE STORY OFFICE/R&D BUILDINGS WITH 28 , 000 GENERAL L® A-FIt7Ns411530 EA Fla iv Y' LOCATED AT THE 600 BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE S.W. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONWNTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES ► DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL _Ai► WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., _ EEPTEMBER 22, 1988 • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. Z' NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. BEADEX MGF. Application to construct a one-story, 8 , 500 sq. ft. metal warehouse to serve as an addition to an existing one-story concrete building of approximately 32 , 000 sq. ft. The proposed structure will displace 20 parking places which are to be relocated on the site. Located at 833 Houser Way North (east of the Boeing Company and west of I-405) . ECF- 032-88. RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three buildings: a 3 story office building of 67, 000 sq. ft. and 2 one- story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft. and 23 , 000 sq. ft. respectively. Located at the 600 block of Naches Avenue S.W. SA-056- 88, ECf-056-88 . This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5: 00 p.m. , September. 6, 1988 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055, . Phone: 235-2550. Published: August 22, 1988 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-056-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-056-88, SM-056-88 PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval t allow the development of three buildings: a 3 story office building of 67, 000 sq. ft. , and 2 one-story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft. and 23 , 000 sq. ft. respectively. • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue S.W. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from August 22 , 1988 . Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , September 6, 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don -Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: August 22 , 1988 DATE OF DECISION: August 17, 1988 SIGNATURES: / • Ronald G. Nelson Od nger Building Official nning anage ., Richard C. ou ghton Public Works Director • 4 r a DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Rivertech Associates ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-056-88 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-056-88, SM-056-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three building: a 3 story office building of 67, 000 sq. ft. , and 2 one-story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft. and 23 , 000. sq. ft. respectively. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located in the 600 block of Naches Avenue S.W. DETERMINATION: Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner to ensure that to the greatest extent possible as many of the significant trees on site are retained. 2 . That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner on -evising the landscaping plan to include plants which will A ' provide sources of food for birds and small animals. 3 . That--the applicant place only clean fill on the site which has been approved by the Department of Public Works. Such fill activity will'nbe allowed to occur only between January 23rd, and April 30th, or whenever all the heron fledglings have left the nests, whichever is first. 4 . That the applicant work with the Police Department and the Public Works Department on appropriate haul routes through the City. Trucks will not be allowed to use the roadway (proposed Naches Avenue r.o.w. ) through the Black River site north of the Forebay area between January 23rd and April 30th or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left the nests, whichever is first. 5. That the applicant limit the operation of construction equipment to the hours of 7 : 00 a.m. and 7 : 00 p.m. No outdoor construction activity shall be allowed shall be allowed within one half mile of the Heron Rookery between January 23 and July 31 or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left the nests, whichever is first. 6. That the applicant provide berming and a row of fast growing, specimen-sized (6" minimum caliber) trees in the landscaping strip near Naches Avenue S.W. to provide a buffer of the site. 7. That the applicant shall work with Metro to develop a TSM program and shall submit a copy to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. Mitigation Measures Rivertech Associates Page 2 8 . \ That the applicant shall reduce the number of proposed (547 stalls) parking stalls by 70 stalls by eliminating 45 of the parking stalls and placing 25 stalls into a landscaped reserve per Section 4-2208 (12) . To the greatest extent possible the majority of the parking stalls shall be eliminated in the eastern portion of the site near the recreation site with the remainder of the stalls being eliminated from the parking area between Buildings 1 and 2. The applicant shall work with the landscape planner. NOTE: The reduction of parking stalls is based upon an 85% efficiency, a standard for industrial developments. 9. That the applicant provide the City with their fair share of traffic improvement costs for the Grady Way Benefit area in the amount of $411, 454. 20. NOTE: The amount was arrived at using the following equation: 67 x 17. 7/1000 sf = 2088 . 6 trips/day 51 x 17.7/1000 sf = 902 .7 trips/day Total = 2088.6 trips/day 2, 088. 6 trips/day x $197/trip = $411,454 .20 Note: This figure may be adjusted once occupancy is established for the complex. 10. That the applicant incorporate oil/water separators, catch basins and screens into the stormwater collection system. 11. That the applicant provide a schedule for the periodic cleaning and maintenance of the stormwater system for approval by the Public Works Department. 12 . That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff on a plan showing indoor recreation space with showers and lockers to serve the employees of the three buildings. 13 . That the applicant provide additional passive recreation areas, with seating and tables, on the western portion of the property particularly between Buildings 1 and 2 . 14 . That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff in providing an easement across the far eastern and southern potions of the property to allow public access along the trail system which may potentially become a portion of the City's trail system. mmdoc 41, ` - CITY OF RENTON MAYOR Earl Clymer August 19, 1988 Mr. Robert Sieh Edwards & Barbieri Attorneys at Law 6501 Columbia Center 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Rivertech Associates Site Plan Approval File Nos. SA-056-88, SM-056-88, ECF-056-88 Dear Mr. Sieh: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee on August 17, 1988 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner to ensure that to the greatest extent possible as many of the significant trees on site are retained. 2. That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner on revising the landscaping plan to include plants which will provide sources of food for birds and small animals. 3. That the applicant place only clean fill on the site which has been approved by the Department of Public Works. Such fill activity will not be allowed to occur between January 23rd and April 30th. 4. That the applicant work with the Police Department and the Public Works . Department on appropriate haul routes through the City. Trucks will not be allowed to use the roadway (proposed Naches Avenue r.o.w.) through the Black River site north of the Forebay area between January 23rd and July 31st or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left the nests, whichever is first. 5. That the applicant limit the operation of construction equipment to the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. No outdoor construction activity shall be allowed within a quarter mile of the Heron Rookery between January 23rd and April 30th. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2580 Notice of Determination Rivertech Associates " August 19, 1988 Page 2 6. That the applicant provide berming and a dense row of fast growing, specimen-sized (6" minimum caliber) columnar type trees in the landscaping strip near Naches Avenue S.W. to provide a buffer of the site. 7. That the applicant shall work with Metro to develop a TSM program and shall submit a copy to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. That the applicant shall reduce the number of proposed (547 stalls) parking stalls by 70 stalls. To the greatest extent possible the majority of the parking stalls shall be eliminated in the eastern portion of the site near the recreation area with the remainder of the stalls being eliminated from the parking area between Buildings 1 and 2. The applicant shall work with the City's landscape planner on the specific stalls to eliminate. 9. That the applicant provide the City with their fair share of traffic improvement costs for the Grady Way Benefit area in the amount of $411, 454.20. NOTE: The amount was arrived at using the following equation: 67 x 17.7/1000 sf = 2088.6 trips/day 51 x 17.7/1000 sf = 902.7 trips/day Total • = 2088.6 trips/day 2,088.6 trips/day x $197/trip = $411,454.20 Note: This figure may be adjusted once occupancy is established for the complex. 10. That the applicant incorporate oil/water separators, catch basins and screens into the stormwater collection system. 11. That the applicant provide a schedule for the periodic cleaning and maintenance of the stormwater system for approval by the Public Works Department. 12. That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff on a plan showing indoor recreation space with showers and lockers to serve the employees of the three buildings. 13. That the applicant provide additional passive recreation areas, with seating and tables, on the western portion of the property particularly between Buildings 1 and 2. 14. That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff in providing an easement across the far eastern and southern portions of the property to allow public access along the trail system which may potentially become a portion of the City's trail system. , Notice of Determination Rivertech Associates August 19, 1988 Page 3 Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end September 6, 1988. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a re-evaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2550 and ask for Jeanette Samek-McKague or me. or Environ t R ' w mmittee, 1 Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/mjp �; .: CITY OF RENTON 1: S: nl1 MAYOR Earl Clymer August 19, 1988 Rivertech Associates 411 University Street, Suite 1200 Seattle, WA 98101 Attention: David Schuman Re: Site Plan Approval File Nos. SA-056-88, SM-056-88, ECF-056-88 Dear Mr. Schuman: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above•referenced project. The Committee on August 17, 1988 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner to ensure that to the greatest extent possible as many of the significant trees on site are retained. 2. That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Planner on revising the landscaping plan to include plants which will provide sources of food for birds and small animals. 3. That the applicant place only clean fill on the site which has been approved by the Department of Public Works. Such fill activity will not be allowed to occur between January 23rd and April 30th. 4. That the applicant work with the Police Department and the Public Works Department on appropriate haul routes through the City. Trucks will not be allowed to use the roadway (proposed Naches Avenue r.o.w.) through the Black River site north of the Forebay area between. January 23rd and July • 31st or whenever all the Heron fledglings have left the nests, whichever is first. 5. That the applicant limit the operation of construction equipment to the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. No outdoor construction activity shall be allowed within a quarter mile of the Heron Rookery between January 23rd and April 30th. • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2580 �1V V L1L VL JJctcl laalalU 1,,ILA Rivertech Associates August 19, 1988 Page 2 6. That the applicant provide berming and a dense row of fast growing, specimen-sized (6" minimum caliber) columnar type trees in the landscaping strip near Naches Avenue S.W. to provide a buffer of the site. 7. That the applicant shall work with Metro to develop a TSM program and shall submit a copy to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. That the applicant shall reduce the number of proposed (547 stalls) parking stalls by 70 stalls. To the greatest extent possible the majority of the parking stalls shall be eliminated in the eastern portion of the site near the recreation area with the remainder of the stalls being eliminated from the parking area between Buildings 1 and 2. The applicant shall work with the City's landscape planner on the specific stalls to eliminate. 9. That the applicant provide the City with their fair share of traffic improvement costs for the Grady Way Benefit area in the amount of $411, 454.20. NOTE: The amount was arrived at using the following equation: 67 x 17.7/1000 sf = 2088.6 trips/day 51 x 17.7/1000 sf = 902.7 trips/day Total = 2088.6 trips/day 2,088.6 trips/day x $197/trip = $411,454.20 Note: This figure may be adjusted once occupancy is established for the complex. 10. That the applicant incorporate oil/water separators, catch basins and screens into the stormwater collection system. 11. That the applicant provide a schedule for the periodic cleaning and maintenance of the stormwater system for approval by the Public Works Department. 12. That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff on a plan showing indoor recreation space with showers and lockers to serve the employees of the three buildings. 13. That the applicant provide additional passive recreation areas, with seating and tables, on the western portion of the property particularly between Buildings 1 and 2. 14. That the applicant work with the Planning Division staff and the Parks and Recreation staff in providing an easement across the far eastern and southern portions of the property to allow public access along the trail system which may potentially become a portion of the City's trail system. Rivertech Associates August 19, 1988 Page 3 Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end September 6, 1988. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a re-evaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2550 and ask for Jeanette Samek-McKague or me. 'ew mmittee, • DoCi:DvirjrRe Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator • DKE/mjp cc: Paul R. Cappock Leason Pomeroy Northwest, Inc. 1127 Pine Street, Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98101 si CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor August 18, 1988 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations issued on August 17, 1988. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES Application for site plan approval to allow the development of three buildings: a 3 story office building of 67,000 sq. ft and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28,000 sq.ft and 23,000 sq.ft. respectively. Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. ECF- 056-88, SA-056-88 BEADEX MGF. Application to construct a one story, 8,500 sq. ft. metal warehouse to serve as an addition to an existing one story concrete building of approximately 32,000 sq. ft. The proposed structure will displace 20 parking places which are to be relocated on the site. Located at 833 House Way North (east of the Boeing Company and west of I-405). ECF-032-88 The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on September 6, 1988. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a re-evaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. Sine , Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/adk Enclosures cc: Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robles, Department of Fisheries Mr. Gerald Marbett, King Co. Bldg. & Land Div. Mr. Gregory M. Bush, METRO 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 �► (• • _, „,: „,.. N 0, 1 4< •S.i. : E ,,,. ,H ENVIRONMENTAL . : DECLARATION ��. APPLICATION NO. ECF-056-88, SA-056-88, SM-056-88 RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES APPLICANT P R P p E D A T I O N APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE [DEVELOPMENT OF 3 BUILDINGS: A 3 STORY OFFICE BUILDING OF • 67,000 SQ.FT. AND 2 — 1 STORY OFFICE/R&D BUILDINGS OF 28,000 SQ.FT. AND 23,000 SQ.FT. RESPECTIVELY GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS LOCATED IN THE 600 BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE S.W. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. ra. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE • (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES IX DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL TOKWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY SEPTEMBER 6, 198E . 41 • AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., , FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. CERTIFICATION - - - I , IJE.R.24 I , L—I Y; , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ! t' E- ( 3 ) - C-OPfiES - OF--- • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN TL-¢i, ,G ( 3) CONSPICUOUS . PLACES ON OR .NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON /14;A(,,(4 1. zzi `,ctg8 , ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public in and or the tate of Washington • w 1�. residing in t , on the me.- SIGNED : f11 )✓Bv�IP t. 0( day of 6168 ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION ECF-056-88 , SA-056-88 , SM-056-88 APPLICATION NO. RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES APPLICANT PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW T E Rpm NT OF 3 BUILDINGS : A 3 STORY OFFICE BUILDING OF 67 , 000 SQ. FT. AND 2 - 1 STORY OFFICE/R&D BUILDINGS OF 28 , 000 SQ. FT. AND 23 , 000 SQ. FT. RESPECTIVELY GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS LOCATED IN THE 600 BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE S.W. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES IX DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL II"WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY SEPTEMBER 6, 198,8 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. ..-_::. !-- , ,, - RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 2 Cj I'DW(0> • DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 22 , 1988 COMMENTS DUE: 8/12/88 ECF - 056 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to aallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67, 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23 , 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. SITE AREA: 10 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY • 1. Earth ° ° ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° ° ./ COMMENTS: T I Pto if e,o Ppvz,KiniG TO 551.X- j\,* THive ., 1-3U(up)►tiCos inn 13,-1 rLE e4c SSlvM. ° j 4ESir (),51lU(0 /�N 55% tj-I-IciEroc . 1 TE 1IV5�ej)0 C) C2,70 i�1 D o\no1O tO0 b CFPtcti liu3t.,. TI-I-E_ ZG3u Ci WOUu e( R.Epu(, e") 2-6- P I :.K I+v(0 S`7{l j , S L 66• _,3 1"p--Le--ta lvb j.,,LL G YY)1r_)o R,rH o P) �1'/', IUU(`' \73 rt v-n) (3")6S 1 42, fiNio We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 1 cu C,C3vil i1-uvi v av-\ 1/4K • .__ D3es5-1' Qdd oo-r ick pvc.,& I c i tc �ki Ct U(\d L oic►ce, t,00rke,r5„, g) ‘ e uite d icinciscJap i h I an 1 Ve, ►kQL CVA - c -44 OCo l o VcL8 k)o, L Q�J 4.11 9 Yv\C'aa°c-t(alien ®fi e, pc i h hor-4'1, iRENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 056 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to aallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67 , 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28 , 000 sq. ft and 23 , 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: Aug. 17, 1988 SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Aug.24 , 1988 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:Sept.20, 1988 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION ----5ZPLANNING DIVISION � ' SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 12 , 1988 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: f Ur I d 3(" mu'ill ®�J APPROVED )< APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 1Z., 1)1 S_tC) l_ok)05C/PI(') o I0(.Ia 0 l U I ik o Do -To Tt C LO C 1 i th..4 EL,o 6 100, moo IF! cr--r iok) i l-th ANMR)(0 lob N o4- '�I�I� lu►�,�p J . �' SI 1Zctsl T �5 'I LJOR)6 c,c,r a Lk). afouto YNrof or *Is P(oj&c-i' v ls+--7- izsto yv\Kx.6 uti p( ( to), 306,(0t,3 PIDDlN(o Q ©55106" fot mio TIC 5l16 � 11 cuiU oy\Vl,G U)5 k)hc465 DATE SIGNATURE OF DI�CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 • 1. 76 / V .., _ �-,> i'r 'Cdn'i. '�,/s, CST`e RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOP Ei�T '" PTT J dye .!'45F,�", ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHs �� , q,� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I ^ "`. —.70 4t r '1!...,,DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 22 , 1988 ���� COMMENTS DUE: /88 ECF - 056 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates CI"Y OF RENTON 99 JUL 2 6 1988 11) PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center 1 L C f� I n� E BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to aallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67, 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23, 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. SITE AREA: 10 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° 0 4 . Plants ° ° ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° o ° ° 9. Housing ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° 0 ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° 12 . Recreation . ° ° ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° ✓ ° ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° ° ✓COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. .0440______„ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative D04 �'e' /Qo, e Rev. 6/88 • N• .. .y • iRENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 056 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 POLICY CE,;ru;',.,,_,.., ,,L;-r,t,;Y;c,,, CITY OF REN ON PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates � J U L 2 6 1988 • PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center 2 ly(� [I \ E . U • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for siteplan a • approval to sallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67, 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23, 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. TO: L' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: Aug. 17, 1988 SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Aug.24, 1988 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:Sept.20,1988 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION ,FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 12, 1988. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: -9-Ire_ W en`li v APPROVED V APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire,Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes......_. No--- Foe Tkeeer Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire'flow of /O� to isoa B/des l is required hydrants with a minimum flow of ./oo gpm each n is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within /So feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within ____...,_ 300 feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes Z. No_ All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes No All fire hydrants are_required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes No DATE /f 1 ��, /9�/SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE G REV. 6/88 /--- z ///. /,-/ /-,:',/ 65,, )i i/ REQU I RCI) FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME A/L7C,-/Cs 612` eir U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS 60 ei/11-, A Rat/6S ,4 E_ --C'ed' FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II AT) III V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD FRAME (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW)D 3. DETERMINE AREA: 7c),� GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: • TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 23gr-Av 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA CA): o?a5"(� GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: - S ...S- IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD,, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B)PM (C) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) /6 f7 S- CD) GPM 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: a /V G 5 63 GPM (E) CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 11 - 30 20% MAX. NORTH �S/ ADD /b % 31 - 60 � EAST �q' ADD .D % 15% MAX. 61 -100SOUTH 7-� ADD /D % 10% MAX. WEST 35 ADD 13 % 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL. % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : s % CTOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJUSTMENT: 9 S?O ( 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: �s GPM (F) (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: -e- GPM (G) 0. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: CIF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: /O- ) ' • GPM (H) r • t. SIGNED: _______ R[QU I RCU FIRE FLOI•I CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME /V cc $ Ci-x.,'6-7e U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS 4 00 ,/'//r NA CA/ 1c /AVe S', GrJ, FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONST' TO - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - 1I IV - III FIRE-RESISTIVE NON- :1-1: V STIBLE ORDINARY. WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DE.TERMINE AREA: /5/�"Q / GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A) ( NUMBER OF STORIES: • TOTAL BUILDING AREA: Z O 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE *1, USING AREA (A): J 752 GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: — 5 7. S GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD,, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) /42. 5- GPM CD) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT; ADJUSTMENT: - A 109 0 LA. GPM CE) CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF 'THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH 15"`o , 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST --R S' ADD Cb ADD O- % 31 - 60 15% MAX. 31 -160 SOUTH //O ADD O S % 161 -100 1 WEST /,, S ADD o 5- % 101 OR1 4-HR WALL 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : ,20 $ (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJUSTMENT: 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT; s�'�' " S`� GPM (F) CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: ` 0 3. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: GPM CG) CIF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,12OO GPM) io?GS (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: . /SO GPM (H) . SIGNED: X ` ,;--s � ' I-ATE if ' 26,C//--J//c/ '/ 2 _I V**/ ' • REQU I RCI> FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENNTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME ////C/e/e$ Ce /-e.p U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS / Od , /k //,tc ,-S IJv6 /�f�, FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRU N - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II I III FIRE-RESISTIVE NON- V COMMB.USTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A) /ol • ,. . NUMBER OF STORIES: • TOTAL BUILDING AREA: ,q,, are 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): -2,6-4/3 GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF GPM CC) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (B) CIF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) / 17,5"' GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OOCCUPANCY0 GPM CE) AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD) 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT•; USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAY(. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. 11 - 30 20% MAX. NORTH 70 ADD /f) % 31 - 60 EAST SJ ADD i $ • 15% MAX. SOUTH • / z S-) ADD CJ 5 % 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST-150 5 0 ,,• % 101 MAX.�, ADD /0 1 OR 4-HR WALL TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : 1-/6 % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADP :TMENT: 4- 7c'O GPM (F)DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: C ) CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: 0. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: GPM (G) CIF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,030 GPM) (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: / b"0 GPM (H) (A I. SIGNED: c�.,...— *.ATE q--2:t.4 --;', ?, /^c'orj/ . . t• 17442-4, RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4 4 0 , C1p el ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET � ,l' Y � ,0, ` A� w ''- : 4371* REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: T. , , , ______, _ 61 DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 22, 1988 COMMENTS DUE: '8/12/88"win - Lot mAti-, . \67, ECF - 056 - 88 PaICY;,-,�, I� CI!y OF p-, APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 D 9 JUL � 2 1988 F . PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates E C k �# �� r PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to aallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67, 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23, 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. SITE AREA: 10 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION : IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY . 1. Earth ° ° o I ° 0 ° 2 . Air ° ° ° 0 0 0 3 . Water 0 ° ° a o ° 0 4 . Plants ° ° ° b ° 0 0 5. Animals ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° 7. Environmental Health ° ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° ° ° ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° 0 ° ° 0 11. Light & Glare 0 ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° • c o 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation 14 . Transportation ° ° ° o______, D 15. Public Services o ° ° O ° ° 16. Utilities 0 0 'COMMENTS: f� 1. x x I t '�1r�q Rarer a t'��Yl Yl W taw --' 2. . 4-Ac 4 a.d.et „ lot-LA.44wa ,.±Q kitAe .. a4,. ft,treetrea..4_,h_. et-44e-e 10-e-e--{&... 4ive-vt..t..„,(..e4A.:"7 ovr-12,--'> We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 0111 Si n�tu`�' � - -71 g re of Director or Authorized Representative D,Alr___ ____4.ta____ at Rev. 6/88 • , • 1 4 • . • • • ArleVVVAA de4AdtL eernawf-L-0Thet-e-oc re.s2.citev-eut-t-o-vel G'xt-erit-fri--c-0--toL-4- 1ree-1-7 crIn . 4 , Il ...) - atAAA, tit.ahArn a-.6tout,FL2r-yLot4 lkk..4449LAt— gotAre, 6-ev-vx.4f-itrt,t-c4W1 off-t_c_eoe atAt_aL Fir-C4=eArVvtAtzle1 .€2)4 OLAPtA-Advt"t- . oteAxt--e-93- vu-trYte-fAze KekvO -F22 .e.e---A-AAr>4.A--4-1 -frac-KA-AA- -f-E5 W yvt_e_Aa.-e-zetAAre, titxt.A.A. i(4A;vki,t_eiy. AAA-Gy Ire-40Gt.A.-r—e_ 214"/ 4"I'Lfriocal7 1 • . • • • iREL.,. ,N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 056 - 88 pt��iL'i' APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 F JUL 2 2 1988 i PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates UE (U illyL PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to aallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67, 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23,000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: Aug. 17, 1988 SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Aug.24, 1988 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:Sept.20,1988 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION • k PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE X. LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 12 , 1988. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVE ITH CONDITIONS NOT PPROVED SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE ,„11_,_:* 11 . 6/88 �C'j,N:M RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4b, '�G �'��•• ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ",,l O7 S REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: poLCIWZ5 \�`L4" V DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 22 , 1988 ;` COMMENTS DUE: 8 /88 r; ECF - 056 - 88 "i F POLICY DEVELOP d"f 13 Drr,4cmici., APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 CITY OF RENTCN I°1 PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates I� AUG 4 1988 IlJ I�1Rll JPROJECT TITLE: Naches Center ®,� BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to aallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67, 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23, 000 sq.ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. SITE AREA: 10 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY . 1. Earth - ° 2 . Air ° ° ° L ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° . 4 . Plants . ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° . ° ° 7. Environmental Health . ° ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° % ° 9. Housing ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° . ° 11. Light & Glare ° . ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° . ° ° 14. Transportation . ° ° . ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have ex ' se and h ve identified areas of probable impact or are where additiona inormation needed to properly assess this 1. proposal. or— v— il . : Signature of ector or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 iRENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 056 - 88 'OLICY DEVELOPMEN) UlI'N(IIvICI., APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 CITY OF❑,E�� • 1 �ITON PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates fLJ AUG 4 1988 ni PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to aallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67, 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23,000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: Aug. 17, 1988 SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Aug.24, 1988 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:Sept.20,1988 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 12 , 1988. REVI,v WING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Wt7) APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED /. ---" ' --- -- DATE �;- t SIGNATUR OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 7 REV. 6/88 - -W'1 ..>.":',,,7, eA RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~DEPARTMEN'' w14 > %;% Np ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SLEET �:': , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: c_H i lc4-►�S "�'''' l2 DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 22 , 1988 COMMENTS DUE: 8/12/'&&? ECF - 056 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to aallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67, 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23, 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. SITE AREA: 10 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION 1. Earth IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY ° : o 2 . Air 3 . Water ° ° o G. ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° ° ° o 5. Animals ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o 0 ° ° 7. Environmental Health C: ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° o 12 . Recreation ° ° 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation o ° ° 15. Public Services ° o ° 6. Utilities o ° ° ° .. ✓ COMMENTS. We have reviewe thi application with particular those which we have e perti have identifiedareas oftprobableoimpact oreas are where addition 1 inf ati is needed to properly assess this proposal. _JaK- . . V / a/fer Signature of D'rector or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 iRENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 056 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to aallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67, 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23 , 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: Aug. 17, 1988 SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Aug. 24, 1988 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:Sept. 20, 1988 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 12 , 1988. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 0T7.4/7-y APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED otf&619S (tl Sir& PL btz5 UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO I LATE.COMERS AGREEMENT-WATER 11/4/0 82 ENE CODERS AGREEMENT-SEWER /S 7' LdEw. f—' Sl /°" S Sig_"1 E IVELOPNENT CHARGE-WATER q7. x435,epoo.cy= 4e4.pO _'f EN=:a DEVELOP CHARGE-SET/EN y.ES g D4/50. x 435;6G04'-g'7'424. ° ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-WATER A/O °�Su C ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER /fig C � _ ::O WATER MAN W a n 4/ 4' �-5 O S L T !�� r' i.K 1$�i/Wirt pr.Rf.1 TO (LKv ;�JED SEWER PLAN )01, w 831 ®i1�t lz ic 4 n. ;:LIVED FIRE 'U1fDRANT LDCATIORS C Bulu9�i�� (v�e7 � RYFIR . . `YUS l 11:E FLOW AN t VMS �`lu DATE 5 f 2 SIGNATURE OF RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 1 �I-27-87a . . r‘, j - RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: fiblicr_ DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 22 , 1988 COMMENTS DUE: 8/12/88 , ECF - 056 - 88 k APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 1PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to aallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67, 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23, 000 sq. ft. , respectively. • LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. SITE AREA: 10 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : z IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION s IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY • �' 1. Earth ° ° ° L ° 2 . Air ° ° ° 4': ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° 7. Environmental Health ° ° ° :` ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° ° ° 9. Housing ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14. Transportation o ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° ° ° ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° ° ./ COMMENTS: Polk,-e. r/Of XA•c /L‘` ?1-00 �iLv�?.L��.rs �J u �i G.9.tiyrr/J���c-rr. /I<.vf ��� � �o f� yV - --. We have reviewed this application with particular those which we have experti e and have identified areas oftprobableoimpact oreas are where additio al in ation is needed to properly assess this p oposal. Signat re of Directoro r Authorized Representative Da Rev. 6/88 iRENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 056 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to aallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67, 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23, 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: Aug. 17, 1988 SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Aug.24, 1988 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:Sept.20,1988 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU L POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 12, 1988 . . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Eaf SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE REV. 6/88 !r//' *. RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ernmeeri DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 22 , 1988 COMMENTS DUE: 8/12/88 ECF - 056 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to aallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67, 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23, 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. SITE AREA: 10 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION ; IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY . ;` 1. Earth ° v 0 ° ° ° 0 2 . Air ° ✓ 0 O ° ° 3 . Water O ✓ ° ° ry . O O v 4. Plants O ✓ 0 O ° O O Y 5. Animals O 6. Energy & Natural Resources O O O O O O 7. Environmental Health 0 ,----- O 0 ° O X. 8. Land & Shoreline Use O r/ 0 0 ° ° 0 9. Housing ° ,i ° O t- 10. Aesthetics O ° ° O ° 0 11. Light & Glare O ,— ° ° o 0 12 . Recreation 0 ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation lam' ° ° ` 14 . Transportation O t•---" O O 15. Public Services ° t, O ° ° O I 0 16. Utilities ° !/" ° O I COMMENTS: Prat/14cl ._"' (:' -,, /-,, -ft(-: ---.7_• A__ 4.-2,-1._Zik_ cairs? i 4-1.-7_7-- •.- -/15-4."1-t-' 5 4r,40 -%3 ® C .:I rn mwrik. 4 ,,,,„ ,-:,,,,, ,,, , ,,, !,-, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Dat�te 7)li\ ��� Rev. 6/88 r/// iRENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 056 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval pproval to sallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67, 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23, 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: Aug. 17, 1988 SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Aug.24, 1988 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:Sept.20,1988 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION • PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 12 , 1988 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Y ,r,_. ,. APPROVED J;VAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • laib r REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REP DATE 75 �'ff; s REV. 6/88 s RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Traffic DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 22 , 1988 COMMENTS DUE: 8/12/88 ECF - 056 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to aallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67, 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23, 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. SITE AREA: 10 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION 1. Earth IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY . G 0 0 0 G 2 . Air ✓ , 0 p G G 3 . Water o V 0 0 G G O 4 . Plants i./. , 0 L//, o 5. Animals 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources o . 7. Environmental Health o V' c o 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use o V o 0 9. Housing V 0 0 0 10. Aesthetics o 11. Light & Glare o , ° o 0 12 . Recreation 0 V/ 0 o o 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation G o 14. Transportation o o o 15. Public Services a � 0 o 0 16. Utilities / o z �`� COMMENTS: 11' jam"`` We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas ., which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where addit 'onal information is needed to properly assess this proposal. P l 7/f r Signature of irector or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 iRENT.ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 056 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to aallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67, 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23 , 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: Aug. 17, 1988 SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Aug.24, 1988 ENGINEERING DIVISION ( TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:Sept.20,1988 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT !!! OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 12, 1988. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED )( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED �., iC •�, v()77 &vim e/ hivk \ 6 7 X /7. '7 = j/85s9 oo0 � ' `�z/Rp s l x /7. 7 94 L 7 :... er),o(� o f r 9 7 frr/f ZG�f `fi' �S/ aJ /p-t.o vPc, �a- e -�' ar . . may'- A— c SIGNATURE F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE g,17/�i REV. 6/88 r a JU RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 22, 1988 COMMENTS DUE: 8/12/88 ECF - 056 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to aallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67, 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23, 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. SITE AREA: 10 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION 1. Earth IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 0 ° is ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° ° 0 ° 3 . Water ° 0 ° ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5. Animals 0 ° ° ° ° 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° 7. Environmental Health 0 0 ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° ° ° ° 9. Housing ° ° 10. Aesthetics 0 0 ° ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° )( ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation 0 0 /� ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° X ° \/ 15. 'Public Services 0 ° ° ° ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° ° `r COMMENTS: �� iflllooi /7 / / y. /'teCre*/l o, - f i@ /h-codeor S!%u-ei� & / 4 c*e/../ f�Gu/I all / 6e //26/u id. Ore' G/l i�7 ?oe-t !J- ` Jevve �/l 1-.��e b (ld n / ° /6( /P`a he zc,e,c'--2de0 ( 6r.,7 re 4 2 7' l'J d ar We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are -` where addi %nal 'nformation is needed to properly assess this proposal. ": Si nat _ / 2/2.11eP, g %' of Direc r or Authorized Representative Date �Je0c/4 /d h / Q�IG� d� Rev. 6/88 `� The �lLIt�Ue ,,g(e ��✓i9�- do ��� 2,7z ) / i /?4// •� -WV/ ,?19--'a ✓�f ' ' ��� ,,1 �� /mod -� r79 --' /// r Z AP G>.ip/7,y iRENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 056 - 88 • APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan a proval o the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: at3 story offfice building of 67, 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23, 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: Aug. 17, 1988 SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Aug.24, 1988 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:Sept.20,1988 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 12 , 1988. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ,4&4Ef APPROVED )( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED J Cc ,d--r as s SL i toar- re&re-ue- ro ,k__ - u"174/ +6471-- - i i/t.du de. TLlaw cr.' a ? l cJCer-1 Z - Pg.fFt'u ReLree4-i-cow // lauL • -I 3 P�.b L -i e G( f'Le F pcd Ft e SIGNATU 'bF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE 60Z��� S�J $ � �e�� Clete)�i/,O e�l,-3 l Li_ anew REV. 6/88 C c. O+ p�,,] � -r5�- ,F� ice e& CSC I I t l 4 r Gv/�tG1Bv7�'!d�2J+ -�7► a "I L�9L�� Q . <u / Ju�e , L /�A,...dd • CITY nF REN'I'ON • BUILDING 4.,.._;DNING DEPARTMENT �~���' Ronald G. Nelson, Director Earl Clymer, Mayor July 27, 1988 Rivertech Associates 411 University Street, Suite 1200 Seattle, WA 98101 Attention: David Schuman Re: Site Plan Approval File Nos. SA-056-88, SM-056-88, ECF-056-88 Dear Mr. Schuman: The Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled forte 'L.c Technical Advisory Committee on August 17, 1988 for consideration. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact our office at 235-2550. Sincerely, ' a d K. Erickson, AI Zoning Administrator DKE:adk . • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 • 1��illi,,ri;!llli=:i r,�iii C...AM aavMao3 al 318V 11 • - ` ,Jgf aU6 i0 (13ss3aaav sa Z/ ) 212°i �� rtment has formally accepted the above referenced r`. ) 7., -(„),?7,4-ittri .....11.C.X7:P.x, and is tentatively scheduled for the �;-1ta�:I:l X1`!' �3k :�i.1.fll)rl--- c_I1#kilo:lri_3 0.1. :3-1:i1V a:313913 3( .}k;, 1:3(1 ION --.-..-.ss3'1(](]4' .1 i`2::1:I:a:C.:I.:If1SN!:I:----•-•.l.i`lV;]V('t _...---•-•::1-13V1.(333 I`3 -11:VW ON--•-••-•(i 3Sf1,i_3a --•---•NMON)1N i•-•--(]:EIWIV...#ONf1•-••-# I-I3f1S ON R� �:,.1uk � �; s��/ SS086 uot2u►ysum `uotuaN- limos anuand Inv 00Z 88. 8 1- •' ,,i - INMALUIVd3Q NINOZ V8 orsac IIflH .' em s _ N /�' 0 0 CITY OF RENTON "LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 27, 1988 Rivertech Associates 411 University Street, Suite 1200 Seattle, WA 98101 Attention: David Schuman n • Site Plan t1 t 1 ua. �pi vvUt File Nos. SA-056-88, SM-056-88, ECF-056-88 Dear Mr. Schuman: The Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for the Technical Advisory_ Committee on August 17, 1988 for consideration. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact our office at 235-2550. /, Sincerely, !____---"/ od) -------------., -----\ ( / ) 1 I C'13-0--- nald K. Erickson, AI Zoning Administrator DKE:adk 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 „ ' ., i; 7‘.0 A ) eA keyt.4-77 / ---0, 4.0, 04. ,.....0 ,,, , , „4„,, ..,4011.704.- i 2,(42 / g / , / t. 7°7 "21 / "-74717Y3ri) 4 v - . 714177 ' rre,P.7. .. 7,...1 0 14. .0.. fogiS.7,5”... 0,c., es. 7_912..... Vss • ,A At A ,,„, -1, --,: ep-7-2,-?,. 0-177-i -7,7/4, -1,- a ( 14-r ----4. • Ay„..X`-re-V7 --rurv.0 oirt< -vit,773-773 ir izeii)() ....----/---,--- -), \ (4, -77-77, 1:it . n-Y. o ( _ :TY . OF .RENTC ._ T FILE NO(S): D1 = 7:n es ®. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT• '�� • - , c�S-co-8% MASTER APPLI A C TION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME . FEES Rivertech Associates ADDRESS REZONE*(FROM_ TO _) 411 University Street Suite 1200 d SPECIAL PEPERM CITY ZIP • ^D TRY PERMIT* Seattle, WA 98101 Q CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE. ^ ' SITE PLAN APPROVAL (216.0 (206)623-5553 0 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON , Q . VARIANCE* . From Section: NAME • I * Justification Required X Shoreline Permit David Schuman or LPN Architects ` ADDRESS ' SUBDIVISIONS: 411 University Street Suite 1200 0 SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Seattle, WA. 98101 CD PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE CD(206)623-5553 FINAL PLAT (LPN)(206)583-8030 0 WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: Rivertech Associates , ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: , 411 University Street Suite 1200 • CI PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP CD FINAL Seattle, WA 98101 TELEPHONE P.U.D. NAME: (206)623-5553 0 Residential 0 Industrial LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS:Commercial D Mixed PROPERTY ADDRESS South Burlington Northern Railroad and N.E. of'Naches . TENTATIVE • EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY Vacant OP FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Building #1: OFFICE NUMBER OF SPACES: Buildings #2 and #3: Office/R&D ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE �741� SQ. FT. ACRES ` . AREA: 45;6d0==- �,10 Acres Rap/ . 2757 TOTAL FEES -124 (. ,_ , • ` g_nAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATEi STAMP L. y`� n1 j ; I[-; r, !i.J ,�,��� © .tea APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: Lw' K.II.. I� L - _ .!, •1 l +q .y j- APP I TION DETERMINED TO BE: ?� ..ere. � " Accepted L-U:',!,.'..G/ZONING DEPT. Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: / CJ - 1 Z - APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: EDAccepted EDIncomplete Notification Sent On By: ROUTED TO: (Initials) Building Design Eng. Fire Parks Police Policy Dev. Traffic Eng. Utilities - — DL`{/TCr,n 1 �. • Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). See Attached Sheet • • AFFIDAVIT I, David Schuman • , being' duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner, owner of the property Involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the Information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS CITY C; PFN-rnN DAY OF cA\ , REq,,r,1 ! ,® 19 ?i i_ 01. 1988 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF ®S�tr�-f .�i&`!!oEi� DEP_7i WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT Ca-c\s-\ ao, S \- t.1 -2Y.Q1CP.0 4-Q6 � ( (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) \U3l.0O R-.v-Lkra.pk.cs-c-o NZ' Ri vertech Associates �cs P \o\P\ 411 University Street Suite 1200 (Address) (Address) 41 : Seattle, WA 98101 " (City) (State) (Zip) (206)623-5553 (Telephone) • Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed In the "Application Procedure." Form #174 NEW PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST AND THE. SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., KING. COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET THEREOF, SAID NORTH LINE BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS, PAGES 98 THROUGH 102, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88°15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1,099.78 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°45'00" EAST 418.89 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE WITH A RADIUS OF 1005.37 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 38°15'05" EAST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTHERLY LINE 346.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 71°29'03" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 912.08 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE NORTH 89°10'25" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 81.57 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 5.0000 ACRES. �o. / AX A4 /32305--,08' NEW PARCEL 2: THAT PORTION OF. THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M. , KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET THEREOF, SAID NORTH LINE BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS, PAGES 98 THROUGH 102, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88°15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1099.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88°15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 526.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°45'00" EAST 225.00 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 853.34 FEET A DISTANCE OF 209.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12°19' 12" WEST 30.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 71°42'49" EAST 218.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°15'00" EAST 350.00 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 1°45'00" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 1°45'00" WEST 400.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 5.000 , ACRES, TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WITHIN 30 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 13, WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET THEREOF, SAID NORTH LINE BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS, PAGES 98 THROUGH 102, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88°15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1,626.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1°45'00" EAST 225.00 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 853.34 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 209.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12°19'12" WEST 325.81 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET A DISTANCE OF 803.66 FEET TO A POINT' OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ON A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,745.00 FEET A DISTANCE OF 1 ,916. 19 FEET TO THE TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE. . / 7 A4. /;Zliy-toe/ FIRST CITY DEVELOPMENT CORP. APRIL 19, 1988 ARTHUR L. HITCHINGS BRH JOB NO. 86114.04 SURV. 411, dl'�a L H1 Tc," I 01'0cs, was• ycs teti IT' FGISTt� `,''' 1� ! �"° —_ r. P5. 001 NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES : SA-056-88 , SM-056-88 , ECF-056-88 . APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT' OF NACHES CENTER CONSISTING OF THREE BUILDINGS : A 3 STORY OFFICE BUILDING OF 67 , 000 SQ. FT. AND 2 ONE STORY OFFICE/ R&D BUILDINGS WITH 28 , 000 SQ. FT. AND 23 , 000 SQ. FT. ,RESPECTIVELY. GENERAL LOCATION: LOCATED AT THE 600 BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE S .W. PUBLIC APPROVALS: SITE PLAN APPROVAL • BUILDIING PERMIT SHORELINE PERMIT The application can be reviewed at the Bulding and Zoning Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2540. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. Ronald G. Nelson Building & Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, k t.IZR1 �, l h)fl HEREBY CERTIFY THAT -rifle. ( 5 COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED` BY ME ON f U((u51' r 11' s ,19 ,IN Tl-tR ( 3 ) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEAR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing in (64A yt r , on the day of g r SIGNED: . Vin, OF R4 ( NDTICE 1 b SEPIE-° OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION D E R I P T I N • • RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES . APPLICATION OR ITE PLAN APPROVATO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF NACHES CENTER CONSISTING OF THREE BUILDINGS : A 3 STORY OFFICE BU:ILDING OF 67, 000 SQ.FT. AND 2 ONE STORY OFFICE/R&D BUILDINGS WITH 28 , 000 SQ. FT. AND 23 , 000 SQ.FT. , RESPECTIVELY, SA-056-88 , SM-056-88 , ECF-056-88 GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED AT THE 600 BLOCK OF NACHES AVENUE S.W. PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED • • SITE PLAT APPROVAL BUILDING PERMIT SHORELINE PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPART` 'INT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY. OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Architecture and Planning '` fi 0 Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc., Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 July 1, 1988 The Schuman Companies Naches Center Buildings 1 , 2 & 3 PROJECT NARRATIVE This proposal is for the construction of Naches Center Buildings 1, 2 & 3. Building 1 is a 3—story office building of 67,000 sf and Buildings 2 and 3 are 1—story office/R&D buildings of 28,000 sf and 23,000 sf, respectively. The western half of the site has previously been filled and a pad established for the ADMAC Facility (Site Plan approved SA-057-86). Office developments exist to the south of the site with the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks above the site to the north. Primary access for Building 1 will be off the Naches Avenue S.W. extension and off of Powell Avenue S.W. for Buildings 2 and 3. Circulation around the entire site will be provided for emergency vehicle use. This project will be developed on approximately 435,600 sf (10 acres). Landscape areas and preservation of existing trees are incorporated into the project along the swale and jogging trail extension. Building courtyards are connected with pedestrian ties along the southern portion of the site. Building courtyards incorporate both hardscape and landscape along with benches and bikeracks. An open space wildlife habitat and recreational area has been established at the eastern end of the property with lunch benches and a horseshoe court. a. The design: for the 3—story steel framed office building will use a combination of the brick and concrete with tinted glass and reflective " ' - glass -accents at the primary and secondary access points. The one—story office/R&D buildings are designed as concrete tilt—up buildings with reveals and tinted glass. Reflective glass, columns and raised parapets define the proposed points of entry. ,-- '„ ( r t. \:,• ra rer---� t4ti i En. Jul_ J iq 8 Architecture and Planning Li rarson Pomeroy Northwest,Inc., Royce A. Berg,A.I,A., 1127 Pine Street;Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 TRANSMITTAL To: City of Renton Date: July 1, 1988 Department of Building and Zoning 200 Mill Avenue S. Project Name: Naches Center Renton, WA 98055 Project No: NW 880.14 _ ; I a �._I i, 1, o',. J�. i I .� Attn: ., I ..g,j Re: Site Approval Submittal .. .1_'.. :G/70'aING DE 1 . Description: 7 copies Completed Site Plan Approval Application with Legal descriptions and Affidavit of Ownership. Includes Original . 7 copies Completed Substantial Development Application with Legal Description and Affidavit of Ownership. Includes Original . 7 copies Environmental Checklist. 8 copies Letter of Design Intent 7 Sets Prints , Site Plan with Vicinity Map, Grading/ Drainage Plan, Landscape Plan, Building Elevations , Street Plans. 1 Set 8 1/2 x 11 PMT reductions of above drawings 1 Application Fee Remarks: ❑ Sent per your Request ❑ For Approval ❑ Other: ❑ For your Use/Reference ❑ For Distribution ❑ For Review and Comment ❑ For your Records Submittal for Site Plan Approval and Substantial Development . permit. Hand Delivered By: Paul Coppock cc: David Schuman w/enclosures Donald K. Erickson, City of Renton OF R4, '�'>, ECF: VE62p J 4~f o z City of Renton Lu: - - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST TfO SEPZEM� Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.2IC RCW. requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency Identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic Information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly. with the most precise information known. or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer. or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations. such as zoning. shoreline. and landmark designations. Answer these questions If you can. If you have problems. the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or Its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals. even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions Involving decisions on policies. plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project." "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. • y ' t.� Li ,'C/ZONING DEPT. 1 , Environmental Checklist — City of Renton Page 1 A. BACKGROUND 1. NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT, IF APPLICABLE: Naches Center 2. NAME OF APPLICANT: David Schuman Rivertech Associates 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT AND CONTACT PERSON: David Schuman or Royce Berg c/o The Schuman Companies LPN Architects 411 University Street Suite 1200 1127 Pine Street Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98101 Seattle, WA 98101 (206)583-8030 4. DATE CHECKLIST PREPARED: June 30, 1988 5. AGENCY REQUESTING CHECKLIST: City of Renton Building and Zoning 6. PROPOSED TIMING OR SCHEDULE (INCLUDING PHASING, IF APPLICABLE): 3 Story Office — Fall 1988 1 Story Office/R & D — Spring 1989 (Both Buildings) 7. DO YOU HAVE ANY PLANS FOR FUTURE ADDITIONS, EXPANSIONS, OR FURTHER ACTIVITY RELATED TO OR-CONNECTED WITH THIS PROPOSAL? If yes, explain. No future additions or expansions are planned for this property, future activities will be for tenant improvements. 8. LIST ANY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION YOU KNOW ABOUT THAT HAS BEEN PREPARED, OR WILL BE PREPARED, DIRECTLY RELATED TO THIS PROPOSAL. Original EIS for Blackriver Office Park by R. W. Thorpe and Associates for Renton Property Associates, April 1982. Checklist and Site Approval for the ADMAC Building Blackriver Corporate Park by First City Equities, June 1986. (See attached list of reference documents) 9. DO YOU KNOW WHETHER APPLICATIONS ARE PENDING FOR GOVERNMENTAL APPROVALS OF OTHER PROPOSALS DIRECTLY AFFECTING THE PROPERTY COVERED BY YOUR PROPOSAL? If yes, explain. Yes, master grading and fill permit for entire Blackriver portion of property. Western portion of property filled through prior permits for ADMAC Development. Naches Street extension submitted with ADMAC proposal. 10. LIST ANY GOVERNMENTAL APPROVALS OR PERMITS THAT WILL BE NEEDED FOR YOUR PROPOSAL, if known. Environmental Checklist — City of Renton , Page 2 City of Renton Grade & Fill Permit City of Renton Site Plan Approval City of Renton Substantial Development Permit (Shoreline) City of Renton Building Permit 11. GIVE BRIEF, COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF YOUR PROPOSAL, INCLUDING THE PROPOSED USES, AND THE SIZE OF THE PROJECT AND SITE. THERE ARE SEVERAL QUESTIONS LATER IN THIS CHECKLIST THAT ASK YOU TO DESCRIBE CERTAIN ASPECTS OF YOUR PROPOSAL. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The project will consist of a 67,000 sf 3—story office building, a 28,000 1—story office/R&D building and a 1—story 23,000 sf office/R&D building. The 3—story office building will be steel frame construction using reflective and tinted glazing and a combination of concrete and brick panels. The 1—story office building will be of painted concrete tilt—up construction with tinted and reflective glazing. 12. LOCATION OF THE PROPOSAL. GIVE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION FOR A PERSON TO UNDERSTAND THE PRECISE LOCATION OF YOUR PROPOSED PROJECT, INCLUDING A STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY, AND SECTION, township, AND RANGE IF KNOWN. IF A PROPOSAL WOULD OCCUR OVER P RANGE OF AREA, PROVIDE THE RANGE OR BOUNDARIES OF THE SITE(S). PROVIDE A LEGAL DESCRIPTION, SITE PLAN, VICINITY MAP, AND TOPOGRAPHY MAP, IF REASONABLY AVAILABLE. WHILE YOU SHOULD SUBMIT ANY PLANS REQUIRED BY THE AGENCY, YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO DUPLICATE MAPS OR DETAILED PLANS SUBMITTED WITH ANY PERMIT APPLICATIONS RELATED TO THIS CHECKLIST. The site is northeast of Naches Avenue S.W.' and approximately 650' north of S.W. 7th Street at the termination of Powell Avenue S.W. in Renton, with Burlington Northern railroad tracks at the north property line. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE (CIRCLE ONE); FLAT ROLLING, HILLY, STEEP SLOPES, MOUNTAINOUS, OTHER b. WHAT IS THE STEEPEST SLOPE ON THE SITE (APPROXIMATE PERCENT SLOPE)? One percent (1%) except area at adjacent drainage swale. c. WHAT GENERAL TYPES OF SOILS ARE FOUND ON THE SITE (FOR EXAMPLE, CLAY, SAND, GRAVEL, PEAT, MUCK)? IF YOU KNOW THE CLASSIFICATION OF AGRICULTURAL SOILS, SPECIFY THEM AND NOTE ANY PRIME FARMLAND. Sand, Silt and Gravel d. ARE THERE SURFACE INDICATIONS OR HISTORY OF UNSTABLE SOILS IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY? If so, describe. No e. . DESCRIBE THE PURPOSE, TYPE, AND APPROXIMATE QUANTITIES OF ANY FILLING OF GRADING PROPOSED. INDICATE SOURCE OF FILL. Environmental Checklist — City of Renton Page 3 Western portion of site has already been filled and building pad established per prior permits for ADMAC. Eastern portion requires fill to elevation ±17. Source unknown at this time. Amounts, approximately 13,300 c.y. f. COULD EROSION OCCUR AS A RESULT OF CLEARING, CONSTRUCTION, OR USE? If so, generally describe. Minor locally isolated runoff erosion and wind erosion could occur during construction. g. ABOUT WHAT PERCENT OF THE SITE WILL BE COVERED WITH IMPERVIOUS SURFACES AFTER PROJECT CONSTRUCTION (FOR EXAMPLE, ASPHALT OR BUILDINGS)? Approximately 78% h. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL EROSION, OR OTHER IMPACTS TO THE EARTH, if any: Siltation and erosion control per City of Renton standards 2. AIR a. WHAT TYPES OF EMISSIONS TO THE AIR WOULD RESULT FROM. THE PROPOSAL (i.e. , DUST, AUTOMOBILE, ODORS, INDUSTRIAL WOOD SMOKE) DURING CONSTRUCTION AND WHEN THE PROJECT IS COMPLETED? IF ANY, GENERALLY DESCRIBE AND GIVE APPROXIMATE QUANTITIES IF KNOWN. Dust would result from construction activities along with emissions from diesel engines of trucks and equipment. Passenger vehicle emissions would increase after the site is developed. b. ARE THERE ANY OFF—SITE SOURCES OF EMISSION? Traffic from nearby roads c. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL EMISSIONS OR OTHER IMPACTS TO AIR, IF ANY: Water trucks will be used as necessary to reduce dust during construction 3. WATER a. SURFACE: 1) IS THERE ANY SURFACE WATER BODY ON OR IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE SITE (INCLUDING YEAR—ROUND AND SEASONAL STREAMS, SALTWATER, LAKES, PONDS, WETLANDS)? IF YES, DESCRIBE TYPE AND PROVIDE NAMES. IF APPROPRIATE, STATE WHAT STREAM OR RIVER IT FLOWS INTO. Adjacent biofiltering swale to the south of the site and a wetland to the north of the site. Drainage is to the P-1 channel and basin. 2) WILL THE PROJECT REQUIRE ANY WORK OVER, IN, OR ADJACENT TO (WITHIN 200 FEET) THE DESCRIBED WATERS? IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE AND ATTACH AVAILABLE PLANS. Environmental Checklist — City of Renton Page 4 No, except through D.O.E. definition of adjacent wetlands at property to north of site. 3) ESTIMATE THE AMOUNT OF FILL AND DREDGE MATERIAL THAT WOULD BE PLACED IN OR REMOVED FROM SURFACE WATER OR WETLANDS AND INDICATE THE AREA OF THE SITE THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED. INDICATE THE SOURCE OF FILL MATERIAL. None 4) WILL THE PROPOSED REQUIRE SURFACE WATER WITHDRAWALS OR DIVERSIONS? GIVE GENERAL DESCRIPTION, PURPOSE, AND APPROXIMATE QUANTITIES IF KNOWN. None 5) DOES THE PROPOSAL LIE WITHIN A 100—YEAR FLOODPLAIN? IF SO, NOTE LOCATION ON THE SITE PLAN. Yes, however, the floodplain was altered by the new P-1 channel and detention basin. 6) DOES THE PROPOSAL INVOLVE ANY DISCHARGES OF WASTE MATERIALS TO SURFACE WATERS? IF SO, DESCRIBE THE TYPE OF WASTE AND ANTICIPATED VOLUME OF DISCHARGE. No. b. Ground: 1) WILL GROUND WATER BE WITHDRAWN, OR WILL WATER BE DISCHARGED TO GROUND WATER? GIVE GENERAL DESCRIPTION, PURPOSE, AND APPROXIMATE QUANTITIES IF KNOWN. No ground water will be withdrawn and no water will be discharged to the ground water. 2) DESCRIBE WASTE MATERIAL THAT WILL BE DISCHARGED INTO THE GROUND FROM SEPTIC TANKS OR OTHER SOURCES, IF ANY (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing, the following chemicals . ; agricultural; etc.). DESCRIBE THE GENERAL SIZE OF THE SYSTEM, THE NUMBER OF SUCH SYSTEMS, THE NUMBER OF HOUSES TO BE SERVED (IF APPLICABLE), OR THE NUMBER OF ANIMALS OR HUMANS THE SYSTEM(S) ARE EXPECTED TO SERVE. No waste material will be discharged into the ground c. WATER RUNOFF (INCLUDING STORM WATER): 1) DESCRIBE THE SOURCE OF RUNOFF (INCLUDING STORM WATER) AND METHOD OF COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL, if any (include quantities, if known). WHERE WILL THIS WATER FLOW? WILL THIS WATER FLOW INTO OTHER WATERS? If so, describe. The source of runoff for this proposal is stormwater from building roofs and pavements. Stormwater drainage facilities will incorporate City of Renton standard pipe and catch basin collection systems. Stormwater runoff wil,l empty into the existing biofiltering swales leading to the P-1 channel and detention basin. 2) COULD WASTE MATERIALS ENTER GROUND OR SURFACE WATERS? If so, generally describe. Environmental Checklist — City of Renton Page 5 Petroleum residues, traces of heavy metals, and silts from roads could enter the storm drainage systems. Treatment proposed below would prevent these materials from causing any major impact. d. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL SURFACE, GROUND, AND RUNOFF WATER IMPACTS, if any: Oil/water separators, silt traps in catch basins, and biofilter swales will be employed to reduce the amount of pollutants entering the P-1 Channel/pond. Sheet—flow through grassed areas and swale vegetation will act as a biofilter to remove additional contaminants prior to stormwater merging with the channel. Open ditches for collection, temporary sedimentation ponds, and erosion control fences will provide protection during construction. 4. PLANTS a. CHECK OR CIRCLE TYPES OF VEGETATION FOUND ON THE SITE: )( DECIDU S E: ALDE' MAPLE PEN, OTHER tonwood C shington hawthor EVERGREE : FIR, 1AR, PINE, IHER SHRUBS A. GRASS CROP OR GRAIN WET SOIL PLANTS: CATTAIL, BUTTERCUP, BULRUSH, SKUNK CABBAGE, OTHER WATER PLANTS: WATER LILY, EEL GRASS, MILFOIL, OTHER OTHER TYPES OF VEGETATION b. WHAT KIND AND AMOUNT OF VEGETATION WILL BE REMOVED OR ALTERED? Grass planted for erosion control of previous grading and clearing, some original grass, shrubs and existing trees except significant trees indicated on the site plan will be removed c. LIST THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES KNOWN TO BE ON OR NEAR THE SITE. None are known to exist on or near the site d. PROPOSED LANDSCAPING, USE OF NATIVE PLANTS, OR OTHER MEASURES TO PRESERVE OR ENHANCE VEGETATION ON THE SITE, IF ANY: Proposed landscaping is shown on the Landscape Plan. Grass lawn areas, combined with a mix of evergreen and deciduous plants, as well as those significant trees indicated to be preserved. Note: previous proposals have provided 4 20—acre riparian habitat and a 17—acre pond and wetland area nearby. The ditch/swale enhancement project has been implemented on adjacent property at the south Property Line. 1� Environmental Checklist — City of Renton Page 9 No units exist on the site c. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL HOUSING IMPACTS, IF ANY: n/a 10. AESTHETICS a. WHAT IS THE TALLEST HEIGHT OF ANY PROPOSED STRUCTURE(S), NOT INCLUDING ANTENNAS; WHAT IS THE. PRINCIPAL EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIAL(S) PROPOSED. The largest proposed structure will be about 45' plus mechanical screen for roof equipment for the three—story building b. WHAT VIEWS IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY WOULD BE ALTERED OR OBSTRUCTED? None c. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL AESTHETIC IMPACTS, if any: Landscaping and building materials are compatible with surrounding development. Some significant trees will be retained as indicated on the site plan. 11 . LIGHT AND GLARE a. WHAT TYPE OF LIGHT OR GLARE WILL THE PROPOSAL PRODUCE? WHAT TIME OF DAY WOULD IT MAINLY OCCUR? Parking lot and exterior security lights. Interior building lights and automobile headlights in the parking areas would occur at night. Glare from building windows and automobile windshields and bumpers would occur during daylight hours. b. COULD LIGHT OR GLARE FROM THE FINISHED PROJECT BE A SAFETY HAZARD OR INTERFERE- WITH VIEWS? no c. WHAT EXISTING OFF—SITE SOURCES OF LIGHT OR GLARE MAY AFFECT YOUR PROPOSAL? none d. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL LIGHT AND GLARE IMPACTS, if any: Control of light dispersion from pole lights and building lights to reduce on—site and off—site glare. 12. RECREATION a. WHAT DESIGNATED AND INFORMAL RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES ARE IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY? Environmental Checklist — City of Renton Page 7 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. ARE THERE ANY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARDS, INCLUDING EXPOSURE TO TOXIC CHEMICALS, RISK OF FIRE AND EXPLOSION, SPILL, OR HAZARDOUS WASTE, THAT COULD OCCUR AS A RESULT OF THIS PROPOSAL? If so, describe. no 1) DESCRIBE SPECIAL EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT MIGHT BE REQUIRED. No special services beyond that which is already provided would be required. 2) PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARDS, if any: None required or anticipated b. NOISE 1) WHAT TYPES OF NOISE EXIST IN THE AREA WHICH MAY AFFECT YOUR PROJECT (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Background noise and construction equipment noise 2) WHAT TYPES AND LEVELS OF NOISE WOULD BE CREATED BY OR ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT ON .A SHORT—TERM OR A LONG—TERM BASIS (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term noise associated with construction of office buildings in urban areas typically average between 76 and 89 dba with the loudest average noise level occurring during excavation and finishing. Long term noise after construction would include normal traffic noise for parking areas and surrounding streets. Noise duration would be limited to the usual workday and construction hours. 3) PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL NOISE IMPACTS, if any: Construction noise would be limited to hours permitted by ordinance 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. WHAT IS THE CURRENT USE OF THE SITE AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES? The site is currently undeveloped and vacant. The western half is cleared, filled and graded. North: Burlington Northern Railroad East: Burlington Northern Railroad and undeveloped property South: Office/R & D buildings and undeveloped property West: Undeveloped property b. HAS THE SITE BEEN USED- FOR AGRICULTURE? If so, describe. no Environmental Checklist — City of Renton Page 8 c. DESCRIBE ANY STRUCTURES ON THE SITE. There are no structures on the site d. WILL ANY STRUCTURES BE DEMOLISHED? ;If so, what? no e. WHAT IS THE CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE SITE? 0—P (Office Park District) f. WHAT IS THE CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION OF THE SITE? MP/MO (Office — Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option—Office) g. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS THE CURRENT SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM DESIGNATION OF THE SITE? The site is near an unadopted wetland designated by the D.O.E. and is not designated in the shoreline master program. h. HAS ANY PART OF THE SITE BEEN CLASSIFIED AS AN "ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE" AREA? If so, specify. Yes, the area of the site within the hundred year floodplain is considered environmentally sensitive according to State Environmental Policy Act Regulations (WAC 197-11-908), however, the floodplain has been altered by previous site grading the new P-1 channel and detention basin. i. APPROXIMATELY HOW MANY PEOPLE WOULD RESIDE OR WORK IN THE COMPLETED PROJECT? Approximately 590 based on 118,000 sf (5/1000 sf) j. APPROXIMATELY HOW MANY PEOPLE WOULD THE COMPLETED PROJECT DISPLACE? No people will be displaced by this project k. PROPOSED MEASURES TO AVOID OR REDUCE DISPLACEMENT IMPACTS, if any: n/a 1. PROPOSED MEASURES TO ENSURE THE PROPOSAL IS COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING AND PROJECTED LAND USES AND PLANS, if any: Proposed uses are compatible with adjacent uses and the comprehensive plan and zoning. 9. HOUSING a. APPROXIMATELY HOW MANY UNITS WOULD BE PROVIDED, if any? INDICATE WHETHER HIGH, MIDDLE, OR LOW—INCOME HOUSING. n/a b. APPROXIMATELY HOW MANY UNITS, IF ANY, WOULD BE ELIMINATED? INDICATE WHETHER HIGH, MIDDLE, OR LOW—INCOME HOUSING. Environmental Checklist — City of Renton Page 10 Future informal recreational opportunities are being developed along the P-1 channel. These activities will include foot/jogging trails and exercise stations. Longacres Race Track and Fort Dent Park are also nearby. b. WOULD THE PROPOSED PROJECT DISPLACE ANY EXISTING RECREATIONAL USES? If so, describe. no c. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL IMPACTS ON RECREATION, INCLUDING RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE PROJECT OR APPLICANT, if any: This proposal will extend a jogging trail along the swale to the south and provide a horseshoe court and picnic area as indicated on the drawings on the east end of the property. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. ARE THERE ANY PLACES OR OBJECTS LISTED ON, OR PROPOSED FOR, NATIONAL, STATE, OR LOCAL PRESERVATION REGISTERS KNOWN TO BE ON OR NEXT TO THE SITE? If so, generally describe. no b. GENERALLY DESCRIBE ANY LANDMARKS OR EVIDENCE OF HISTORIC, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, SCIENTIFIC, OR CULTURAL IMPORTANCE KNOWN TO BE ON OR NEXT TO THE SITE. An archaeological excavation of a prehistoric Indian living site, sponsored by First City was conducted by the University of Washington in 1981. Significant artifacts were removed for study and a report was compiled (James C. Chatters, Project Director, January 15, 1982. Interim report on excavations at Earlington Park to Department of Anthropology and Museum of Man, Central Washington University). .The Project Director also indicated no further study was required and that construction and development would not damage the archaeological value of the site but would, in fact, preserve it by not disturbing it further (letter from Chatters to David Schuman, May 12, 1981). c. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE'OR CONTROL IMPACTS, if any: None. The archaeological investigation was concluded. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. IDENTIFY PUBLIC STREETS AND HIGHWAYS SERVING THE SITE, AND DESCRIBE PROPOSED ACCESS TO THE EXISTING STREET SYSTEM. SHOW ON SITE PLANS, if any. There is direct access to Naches Avenue S.W. and Powell Avenue S.W. These connect with Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way which lead to Interurban Avenue S. and I-405 to the west and Rainier Avenue S. and I- 405 to the east. b. IS SITE CURRENTLY SERVED BY PUBLIC TRANSIT? IF NOT, WHAT IS THE APPROXIMATELY DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST TRANSIT STOP? Environmental Checklist — City of Renton Page 11 No. The nearest public transit stop is approximately 1/2 mile from the site. New transit stops will be considered by Metro as the entire Park develops. c. HOW MANY PARKING SPACES WOULD THE COMPLETED PROJECT HAVE? HOW MANY WOULD THE PROJECT ELIMINATE? This proposal would provide approximately 550 stalls and would not eliminate any stalls. d. WILL THE PROPOSAL REQUIRE ANY NEW ROADS OR STREETS, OR IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING ROADS OR STREETS, NOT INCLUDING DRIVEWAYS? IF SO, GENERALLY DESCRIBE (indicate whether public or private). This proposal will require the extension of Naches Avenue S.W. as a private street per city standards for future dedication which would extend approximately 500 ft. north which was previously approved with the ADMAC submittal (completion of the cul—de—sac at Powell). e. WILL THE PROJECT USE (OR OCCUR IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF) WATER, RAIL, OR AIR TRANSPORTATION? If so, generally describe. No use of these forms of transportation is anticipated; however, Burlington Northern Railroad is located north of the property. f. HOW MANY VEHICULAR TRIPS PER DAY WOULD BE GENERATED BY THE COMPLETED PROJECT? IF KNOWN, INDICATE WHEN PEAK VOLUMES WOULD OCCUR. The project would generate approximately 2,475 average daily trips, based on 21 trips per 1,000 gross square feet (gsf) pm peak hour traffic of 2.4 trips per 1000 gsf or 285 pm peak hour trips (trip generation and informational report, 3rd edition, 1982, Institute of Transportation Engineers). Peak volumes would occur between 7 and 9 am and between 5 and 7 pm. g. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS, if any: The completion of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and continuation of 7th to Oakesdale with the signalization of Grady Way have improved access and circulation. Bike racks will be provided in effort to encourage bike riding. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN AN INCREASED NEED FOR PUBLIC SERVICES (FOR EXAMPLE: FIRE PROTECTION, POLICE PROTECTION, HEALTH CARE, SCHOOLS, OTHER)? If so, generally describe. no b. PROPOSED MEASURES TO REDUCE OR CONTROL DIRECT IMPACTS ON PUBLIC SERVICES, if any. Buildings will be sprinklered and will have private security accommodations. Parking lots will be lit in accordance with Renton building regulations. Environmental Checklist — City of Renton Page 12 16. UTILITIES B AT T cI E: RICIT ATURAL GAS WATE REFUSE SERVIC TELEPHON (SANITARY SEWEE) SEPTIC EM, OT . b. DESCRIBE THE UTILITIES THAT ARE PROPOSED FOR THE PROJECT, THE UTILITY PROVIDING THE SERVICE, AND THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ON THE SITE OR IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY WHICH MIGHT BE NEEDED. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone, Washington Natural Gas Puget Sound Power and Light, Renton Water and Sewer and Renton Storm Water Utility provide service to the site. All utilities are accessible from Powell Avenue and Naches Avenue requiring minor excavation to extend to the buildings. C. SIGNATURES I, THE UNDERSIGNED, STATE THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND COMPLETE. IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE LEAD AGENCY MAY WITHDRAW ANY DECLARATION OF NON—SIGNIFICANCE THAT IT MIGHT ISSUE IN RELIANCE UPON THIS CHECKLIST SHOULD THERE BE ANY WILLFUL MISREPRESENTATION OR WILLFUL LACK OF FULL DISCLOSURE ON MY PART. Proponent: Vaoi /_i .s+ _x, Name Printed: David Schuman See attached exhibits for list of documents relating to project site. SPECIFIC REFERENCE FOR PROJECT SITE A. Rezone: City of Renton, File No. R-057-80. B. E.I.S. for Blackriver Office Park by Thorpe & Associates, April 1981 DEIS, April 1982 FEIS. C. Grading & Fill. 1. Renton Grading & Fill Permit: Application No. SP-024-86, Permit No. B-12252 issued. 2. Washington State, Department of Natural Resources, Permit No. F. P. 09-10246 for Forest Practice, issuance date: 3/29/87. D. ADMAC Building (Proposed on western portion of Site 1) 1. Renton Site Plan Approval Application No. SA-057-86, approved and issued. 2. Renton Building Permit Application No. 4236, expired. 3. Renton Variance Application to extend Naches Cul—de—sac, No. V-058- 86, denied by Hearing Examiner (private road approved by hearing examiner). SPECIFIC REFERENCE GENERAL AREA A. Grading & Fill for Valley 405 Business Park: 1 . City of Renton Grading & Fill Permit Application No. SP-100-86, approved. 2. Renton Shoreline Permit' Application No. SM-004-87, withdrawn. 3. Environmental Checklist No. ECF-024-87. B. P-1 Channel, City of Renton: 1. Renton Shoreline Application No. SM-093-81, approved and issued. 2. Renton Special Permit No. SP-060-81. C. Earlington Industrial Park: 1. Renton Shoreline Application No. SM-91-81. 2. Preliminary and Final Plat — WA Technical Center Plat. D. Oakesdale L.I.D. , City of Renton: 1. Renton Shoreline Application No. SM-004-81, approved and issued. MISCELLANEOUS REFERENCES A. Department of Ecology — Wetlands Determination dated April 27, 1987. B. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE)'. Letters indicating that Valley 405 site was not subject to COE Section 404 (Clean Water Act) jurisdiction. To Barbara Moss, First City Equities, March 4, 1987. To Delton Bonds, Alterra Corporation, December 16, 1985. C. City of Renton Wetlands Study, 1981. 1 . CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE: N FCC HE APPLICANT: Vt Z,1 ECii A 55OC. t)1 • APPLICATION NUMBER: Q5 o j The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code. Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER C & PS Railway Company (Not available from King County Assessor). Contact: Burlington Northern Railroad 2100 - First Interstate Center 999 - 3rd Avenue - Seattle, WA 98104 #132304902001 Fairview Pointe Associates 26360 Aric Lane c/o Junta Dale Los Altos Hills , CA 94022 #811900-0010-09 Seventh Avenue Co. P.O. Box 598 Bellevue, WA 98009 #182305-9036-07 CF CHG Associates 200 S. 333rd Street #132304-9025-06 Federal Way, WA 98003 Holvick Deregt 1230 Oakmead Pwy. Suite 210 #918800-0050-04 Sunnyvale, CA 94086 #918800-0060-02 #918800-0040-07 First City 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 #918800-0140 Seattle, WA 98104 #132304-9024 #132304-9083 Sunpointe Associates 520 Pike Tower Suite 2300 #214370-2280-06 Seattle, WA 98101 #214370-2245-00 rn (7 P% L y wf L J J JUL U LTY G/ZONING DEPT. aR ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER CERTIFICATION I. Paul .R. Coppock, hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington residing at on S ay of rs, SIGNED: - �rP1- _ CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I, R.R`( '• LI.ID , hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on Gj J 4 - ` , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public, in and for th State of Washington residing at b/ , on the I4 tit day of *Sc=Pre143 , 1'1 RA p � SIGNED: 1, e..A.AF `r; (Jv/v"yA, FORM WS r 6 iRENT1ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 056 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to aallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67, 00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq.ft and 23, 000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: Aug. 17, 1988 SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Aug.24, 1988 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:Sept.20,1988 UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON AUGUST 12 , 1988. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED / ii DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENJN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 22 , 1988 COMMENTS DUE: 8/12/88 ECF - 056 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-056-88 and SM-056-88 PROPONENT: Rivertech Associates PROJECT TITLE: Naches Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to aallow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story offfice building of 67,00 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D buildings with 28, 000 sq. ft and 23,000 sq. ft. , respectively. LOCATION:Located at the 600 Block of Naches Avenue S.W. SITE AREA: 10 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° 7. Environmental Health ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 9. Housing ° ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° i _ 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° 14. Transportation ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 i\ LOREN DAVIS DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT THE SCHUMAN COMPANY REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT 16300 CHRISTENSEN ROAD BUILDING 3,SUITE 219 206-241-7211 SEATTLE,WA 98188 FAX 206-241-7214 .4 `• :ti. i :4 - , ,:41\ '4 %. '..: iplif• • t1 l i 1 t.. •'jp I. i rl i .. /Oa Et . • t ` wl + • 1 •.- i -. .• !L!• f 1' f� 1 1 1 , , ..L .. . . -,,,,,orc, if 403 s• 1#4411•114"W ) (ff.. 11)fo • ,4 - , , "••, ' •,---. ,,;,t . '• ,!, • , •I ' ,' ' 1 •..A. .15, ,A F Yr ..* je ' • C , rt 4" • iii• ‘••• •.1.-• 4 • I' . 411ii 4) ern dOS -e''—'''' : -' '— '•' .1$4 , A f•• .-IP le 4 lidp , . A • 1,* ' "! .tiligiVi. .. 'r,X t `1, 7 ".2"IP, f, '' •".,r4, 4'.-4, 'II *- 1 • ,tlar' , • • .:.. ta( le lir ji•1. ..• . 111 -.. , ..-4.". • V4.1 •y '111% -: '. , - , , ., . • .. •-•.- ........ , . , A •.:'-- •:.....71.••.•.,: ' ' 4.- ' • '• ' ' ' . . ,. •-• . ,., •, •ii, • . .47,,, :i •,(1.`,• , , •' • . . '-' -• . • ' .5. • 5-• 104 --.. ..1 „ • 0•••••. .. • .3 411011 '""--...-,.. -•. •1••.- t algon.•-!. d 1 , • , ,ir ....'. '' - " - I i'0'41 11 i '.4 r , . 4 ' - s '- . ... . :.-twit. -- • , .- . . ..4...• Q. .^ 1:.,...!ra...... itt. 4 •. A. Z't' I „:".• ., , • • . .• 2 -I -90 r, Sri r•- ,1 1. • '/ ` � �1itit 104/ r! , .L. .. . , ..,.,„_ I j � ,,, . 1 IYI J, * l. . $. ' :1 • I i �.1 / :� i r r ' ` :s • t 4 4 . 4�P, J , 'I f *, 1 r • , "� A r ,�f:.:y+1. }1` 2 - - y h,7 r- -z �cdt-lcl NJ I SITA\Zl oh - � I - Z C" JUN 05 '89 08 55 ERaH 206 323 7135 P.2/2 1 BUS$, ROW & HITCHINGS, INC. (206) 323-4144 MEMORANDUM OF MEETING/PHONE CALL P434 24I 72/ TO: ,V___-��Ll)f PHONE NO. : 2�f—'7s�/f Asief_~, TITLE: l7/ FIRM NAME: Z.0 /ty REGARDING OUR: I_I MEETING (AT ) DATE: 6-2.8, TIME: 2 66 4%1 1:j I CALLED YOU 62r YO ALL ' JOB NO. : /7 f.. SUBSTANCE OF MEETING/PHO ' CALL D° --.. v IL i it— r 'ICD e...:',11,647-.,,,, i f Mill • , , 1110 . , __ __,______ _....... 6 , 0 z.s .„, , ,...... _ „.......„. ,...., _ _ r Li of, Oo -(cr ( = 220 / a _ 71&12 OP f OA) 't 2 1'' ' EXl-`r !6, ALE e � ��o' ` At Q 1 A-es-E `Trc e'-t •_ . 27 c zO'00 / -'r-e,,rr Nn_f-rz�-2 cd` 271.4)2Q1 2�'�pt. 33 1 270° Oor '2O° Do 9"k0' ' /0°33 6. - x/ UX .T".6.N 8�-O X O 1 s.�2 iia 'bc„vC �eiSLPu�n(ir4 �, ,�r�Al � +.yi s ' Less l.41" b./ .7MT . FROM: �� T� AlrrI /L4/S BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, rhr. 1 "2"Ic. 9rc.4 e' fs IF TP.IS DOES NOT MATCH YOUR UNDERSTANDING, PLEASE PHONE US IMMEDIATELY AND THEN CONFIRM IN WRITING WITHIN SEVEN DAYS THANK YOU q7r° ice q/ r jr aa ((.6).t �Iv `� v ,,\=- PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND CC 0. 1�� R(-wH,hilo w+ rb•Id7.rmA•E, voFrG W • � t ';- r!) rtxtan ak s:�Ir ,a,l-i v...p1-G, ( locwsf,11 P.aa 0.,. Z uJ IaMUi Gam, i4'(=7, tNU .1^'k FIB++ l,GNfL�• 0 \� �. Nw/�FIH4 PC?'R-,WUHa.v-j�i.a�1�WNra q:Er"'a�pj� 11'A•G Z \ rant -fR�, -xb(fG Rr2...YSifG-€r1 Rcro ceia¢;.vfNrlrsxaX p� -flr+B W \ 41 vof eB ,1,zan�. '.. g-Id Nrrf• < \ ,� •` .N.khvaHp raK�•anu.a+.r'(,w VAHHI‘K,-/IHw, rvu}•(-r*GW-, a Q w�rv•...am \;\ .w:A� II'fi +uw1,l er1,•E%°ctv op- 1'F✓('i I(7'�O[i Y r-�`N'~rV ., \�,\ 1HHW+- CAAZ,Uk aP.p -1 -1-1607 a �2• U Cl) / sv raw.erera.lav ,\< ..IHOYlfUP17C�7 ErWsprka 2'�f�O lr'H i `./ic I''i t n(K2�j9 Z . ��J Al/\JJ GHQ;. a7+c z a r ra wow- I a o . 0 I _ w �•-..>o `yam `J \� ;. worPa.k. GEM c ue 0. 'fHWM eG �,y ^O Fk. �r♦',Wcf�O MZ LJ W 0 '\ we�sLAPE..Pn�NWr W `\ 41, 1 - ,< Cr k \ 41,4.a'''. I \ — N TES..E 1.88 \;�\- W W O \ h Q���1�. a�sS,�b 'a`ns. �E nfY! �40�\ .,,-C Ev-�c ,Ny mIIJrt-,G I Q1 t n tyt f iui ee M_ yrr+ M4;`; T-:;.."'•' + v+ •'.N.,..... \�Ex/ oqG ggq r t�,� o+b V ' . E�aOI -'4.,y - \[q`N q R(`72+`.'F7() - p la+ m. 3 t {g p. o_�_j, U) •�I Yyy ..► ate 0'` ,-. �, , . _ JIt--•I- �a,_ ..._��1I 1 .Lq:.q w,/H"'x.,6 [•rM'hR'� 1 1 T lR' • s w o.c o ou d• o TggC F 1 9a r17 Q� T `li E roRPtf�fbH ; P', ', ' . .PER DM'S 1 •�� -SAJ��B...✓ � 2yp� `_ _� n. %ft =I •l ligt, n � ! I ,� , *i.e.....:. 80 ,gx q�i �� ■ • • 7A a Si ccNIEE¢rpo-z O ■ • L4 it 1 1 I N` • �yI®►�.1h rfv�•�iyl�'•. I Ili 1r4. aST _ slJ�µ�.ca 4'� p„ YS 0���=i— Cie i�1I efrai• 1I1 �: �I�r dip'— ti a> >IF00- ! ., if ,:. ,:� � • 1 4- iffs- •i $ i \ ,.A ,r- Boa,.-'wiz � - 7 .• _ i �'z'►? rj // .A i A>y� l ,e_..•1� �./ � ah7:• ` �, ir/.'„ v-'%i%%''''''it iJf/��!//�/�!I/ ``ii` E �._ .TKO. - ` ,� !. - . 'r .- —�f NBPtVAS'E'.BT.S)' _..�.._. -��;r.�.i 1mac �.• r� 1 \` �'��' x .v .- _ --, I I 1 '�ri `i y -1 f' r1 MOM]DRAINAGE EWAlE p I enoe W- t/.•'1�.�.,rl q qL�t�i�.L� iN l I ACCESS MAINTENANCE EASEMENT EIB1N0 70'EASEMENT llE Jl NrHrway V'+• P�+.rANan "'I / I &.-vei I/IN Mr PIMLI E A TRANSPORTATION •J•II 1' I �' I O �1�/ OF OIL A GAS EASEMENT II / 1 i NO _OESLRIPTION y^• OATS+ I I O I r MOTE]■IEME10 � MIMING■IEM■M) ; 1EEfns�w<W>z Cv%ESLL 61 LEGEND The Mitchell /\ LANDSCAPE PLAN .PATH LIGHTSNelson j — ipn-- .:...�BlacLA RACIt Group : { RIVERTECHCORPORATE CENTE D�)�BENCHN%rated �'w I ,B ".� RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES .., ' rAll.N Ri RENTON,WASHINGTON 1 JOB NO NITA SNEET NO CD CITECD-(W / 120' , / 310' y 45' 120' . r i L I t —-- 1. z cc Iii BLDG.2 WEST ELEVATION BLDG.2 SOUTH ELEVATION , , / 310' 120' r cO -/- 145' _ 1 Z U Z / 9D / W z O I- , —_ 11I / Ua T_z u) g Q TW = BLDG.2 NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.2 EAST ELEVATION = V Z BUILDING 2 V W Z H a Painted Tilt Up Concrete Panel Tinted Glass- —Reflective Glass / 728' / / 270' i ( , , ,--r l�f 7 . _ ; ". NO DESORPTION DATE BLDG. 3 WEST ELEVATION Entry(typ.)- BLDG.3 SOUTH ELEVATION 272' 55 I — I t r—�L 1 7 -_ _- BLDG.3 NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.3 EAST ELEVATION BUILDING 3 NACHES CENTER THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES BLDGS.12&S3 RENTON,WASHINGTON ELEVATIONS BLDGS.2&3 JOB NO BB014 SHEET NO OF DATE 'Occ EE DM.HECK. g Of g CHECK•FRG, Cl)• W 137'-2• 224'-10• / Z Brick Panel Mechanical Screen Concrete Panel Tinted Glass W O 1� -�� I I Z 8 z \iimuTh II�111111111111d■■�LIuQ■■■� I f I - W Z i,u.................iiiiiii•.•ti... - - -� U Q z �111111111u111111111111■■■MIME■■■■ _ ••u..•.......u.■.u.iu...i■■■.■....� a Cl) _ (I) ..unn.mnimi.u..u...I.......... T I1-Frn ( = Q Reflective Glass-- I I Main Entry 2 >z V co o W 1' BLDG.1 EAST ELEVATION BLDG.1 SOUTH ELEVATION Q I LLJ • 22a'•19" 7 137,2" - 59'•5° / 53'-0„ ' 59'-5° 59'-5° 77'-9. NO DESCRIPTION DATE I - 1 - -- ex - MENU:.. . I I 7 I■�■ ■■■\®i111111i1ii11i�111�11/i ■e E L C `, I \ , ■■■■■■■■■■■O1111111111111I1111111N ■ ■■■II■■■II■■■l1111111111111111111111' Secondary Entry—I Secondary Entry—I BLDG.1 NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.1 WEST ELEVATION NACHES CENTER • THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES BLDG.ELEVATIONS H K RENTON,WASHINGTON .»'� :wax Son..WA 4a01 00 syJmw ELEVATIONS BLDG.1 Job NO.0E014 SKEET NO OR DATE .6,,,,, CRAW!. CA, 8 of 9 CHECK.MG ♦\ PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND ♦♦ \ O ..91t rv.//j i+i'+-I 0. Pc H. �v�- wnv9.r0 i Pq�*4' N\ \ 0. 3 �a 'at^T, �ff�c-�,rori t wL6,Ik�+r,•( iouwlf, o�xl�F%•+Fi�. .♦\ r�^wl \ :I rw be uaJ� v[o 9+ea fF .FCa da41 (1,u�- Fi. n-ka u+ Fw....,„ FT�•i�-i IN�Hcuv-/F�.n%WrYa ,...'.,.0„l J.,.nee y'�," • N con,FraG-frr -,, .xbP.Ts �r ,wlyiTf l P�v reta¢,aA•f�+ PAaF-PiriB w ♦\ cr,a,I:1 7 e 04r4Vh rixt"+G +�il,'.ucen,J,PuV+4�r�..nhr4•fi"i fA Er4- Q b�cuP'-'iHlr/wHrtEli, ihFf'ILYDLro'i F'P 04C,.P4/ E I.T+(ruh,Pev r24.,,u,v,ter_, +' W CC Ca ♦♦\ ciranuo u;, .fa-I•�u•ak I-r•(,pNnlu-Irlrlu,�✓it+w' Pvu1-(�m�." / la c s+�,•.-b.,ryv ♦ EZ3 rh(funM/Itao+..2 3l"oov oP- 'I'IPofa a IG"ou O ♦ i / (/yy tv t,rP un-er4,�v `. ,-,A,i.C. or.i,V.-pit'( * .....-1 Irh6uV5,,,Lo dr •uyonMw cW aeV I 7y P-..-P. o W z Z♦\.\, a z \ UHpI7fUH7'� Er' -tra e6��✓.to'HFPoIal'f `•/'I(a W"r,�E hi7 7 JJ' ♦ " I-.44se- ..,-.osv Pr{ra .K.ai. C _ �w U , %No--N. .I I wwa r4,--1_, N 1.05.00•E 16.64 \.'•. U V+ Q a wa — Q w r1 I no ""`" - N88 5 .-0 Ll..l I " ' �7 r�3 u•w,o r�uw,u�, 414 \ ad co•-a..., Q �,.. t.4�a��,14,71 M wiz Lli I/Mf i Ir ! 1 1 -41 1. -"*. v✓�fC��f�f-i���;wi I E 40E a!► 1'a '' JJI:1 40, j4 y l!. 4u, :,,,cr P \ e r lv o ie Q� n� n. �► 1�I -.� •ti. .� �exis Ili � r' ♦. ►t }r'�/ N R-, �ORi. m y ,F pia; � o� �Ir.'• �il Gipt' rR \ \RGTOR , .'ffr:)�y `YI. /A't!sl{. a'°�°�'•' 11 i _ �'votir Itrr.:r�a+� Prs4co4.,*I .1 l AI` .16. J row rz-r,,r..,•.o- �� �/iM/,�` ° � R\ROAD to•A+rt•a.w,r. ,./ r'I�.11v.�Gd,r�7 c 1 ;1 ; K •�,i T 2 ,�, , w.r°!4 �� micas - rya•) ti '� 1 ��, 'LIB,/ �i44Y� \�� z I o hilitivOrAgH f F .1g i� \ 4 Fio- `+•, It`s1..__T „,:.s+. ,:„ v `, "'r'/444-� l ~F, 1,'l �j� z .H• w' -a + „,-A--..--;.,--,,—,_—_--_,— i OI •"fI1./1'rlI ^iin Yt -Ipltd•blimidilxeao . 'Eft t Z-.4i ,.%-ih.o.,ti d t '\ •,/ 1 -��% 4 . ,m, Vti_ .. .r ,,.. ./ , ..mot ,• `S� //'Y' \\�\ , II g Air AN ems- ` •,�I \h1���, -- t0• I \•/ 3' III EYDiTNO DRAINAGE SWALE EYISTIIG 20 ASEYEKT WE ��� µ;:"n-1 //✓w, (/6I %x n,,, cn I I ACCESS MAINTENANCE EASEMENT �I ••f.II I I fir-^-,,A, , / /O'..1 F(N JO'PIPEEWE b TNANSPON•ATIFN Ir t r 4 Q' OF OLL 6 GAS EASEMENT 1 I I NO DESCRIPTION DATE d re nPp.ow.lua.T•.1.7M-08 EXISTING BUILDING E%ISTMG BUILDING �. 46 r.4.1414l dl LEGEND NACHES CENTER The v PATH I.IGIITS /\ Mil LANDSCAPE PLAN :I IIAC% THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES Neils on A o0 MI�,CII y. h5. 150',00 �, RENTON,WASHINGTON incorporatedd'P!L . r06 0Q A,A:Rsba l LanaPl.n,wg 'Ea Sep.Set).W „ 4 at '''''',.U,bnn DesignA�.�,n. LANDSCAPE PLAN 2005.0 A0.,00101 sMme 120M0 Om M,56 D:e NO eeou SHEET NO OF LOMWxtrt 7 of 9 CHECK-r.l} • • TABULATION SITE AREA J:435,600 S.F. • •• BUILDING AREA 5113,837 S.F. \ VICINITY MAP OF ADJACENT USES BUILDING FOOTPRINT x64,197 S.F. CC •♦ \ • Z COVERAGE ±26% W UNADOPTED ,I SITE COVERAGE J:15% Z \♦♦ • WETLAND �• NACXXSE1V AVE �, , PARKING W NACRES E BV STANDARD x321 STALLS •r .,.'N''- �.�. •;1� .��. RC/C Dry. D COMPACT i180 STALLS(3T%I U \ 1 +:.-';;A i.CHS.SICEt .S�a_it H... R HANDICAP zB STALLS ' NACHESI EN ER,�!-,t` y:, NkA' 04 TO .5J0 STALLS I/JO<SF.S W%EFF. ♦♦\ }� • - M1J I{f P ��,- RESERVE =3B STALLS •S ^ >�G4 TOTAL 355E STALLS 1/1B9 SF.p 83%EFF. ♦ • •b� 1 `O 7*. '�,#.>, ®uo v T1 OODPLAN• VICINITY MAP Q CO W Y I p ;^ CC `\ %. mi Mly •It. Ai•: \ • A ;Y - ' NORTH SCALE I il ITY' e'�rowav `1 + : A ooD ♦ { . I 'g UNADOPTED \ cAaE .. 6�i;iN'j EBDDH VO VUro1,r*,+eo Yyy \i�'-,„_'ag._ • WETLAND 4,2•, ? . OIOr • .�." N:\ ,, c."-.?/..sTZ. a lr �� PAK Z -cam -_.--._ o y� �\ • *•• SDRNCFN100 0:GACRESE W (W1 = I. \ \ -' \�(�_\) - ` -•- PVD INE. GENERAL Ia. /R� VALLEY re 1— ''. ET / - .gyp tY/ _. 10 LINE.ra- PRwe HOSPGAI LL. :�` ` ♦Y�p\ �NT�5—J80'E 11A9'.� "y • wAiL ONALOO 0.r'r SIIOfN �i. W W O �\NR♦ _ - w:`4p4 to—N 'K,JS0.00 `r` `\ . .'r,'COTrOnrLOD EIMIIFSA /\ >CC CC I- 1 i ‘�. - • O. —. MF WrtO wD O D'LQira+Dw LE uEND /� Ta 1 . - - - 1 �� \ . ��7 GOrTON -R MPJ:tS oTREES.G TO BE REMOVED �- 1 - TREES TO BE PRESERVED NORTH ' • 1� �Y�J/l rI i._—,:� ��, \O•r I. • /, •'n -. , E� :-.c.:7::±7:1::::::, aPArH uonrsl1. I)1 ` \ A� tee' ST1cl a II'I sla `l Kik •\.Bea 4P�• q / E3BENCNE RACKI Ij �` ,,, •6C.. % 77{fRNRo-^E%ISTINGSTflEET LIGHT( _ - �^ l - i Y�1,►^•!'R A/ 0 E%ISTMG FIRE HYDRANT 1 1 y r--' '--i _ -- I f - / CRD p r o-n PROPOSED STREET LIGHT Ia i w�P a .. _ \ 4CKS_..JPROPOSED FIflEHYDRANT } ' r T �,\ ~ �` ®TRASH ENCLOSURE /•: -_ —7fOrth%l .L _ / 11A x. 1 217y705�SF _ , �IE II " '.- `'� _]9TO S.F. : 1 ilYwT a� .Y'�, .� � =\wis e6(nFI.+I_rP/ - t D lk x..--- 1 ri• mP GT.... �'s — ,,� �, �� €;!:•.:ice- .r.� iDt 3 � � J� ,.1liFl �b�G� • �", --- .�Y _�� �__ �.. - �.. 1TT�T. - w euT v JJ • J �..�..�. L e oB—f-4.„, G.sa ��rr _ - _ �_ O.a5. • ILIA' :;-\ a u:LLn+ .' quu.w •j' >f.'S¢EEHaw UNITE.ACCESS DRAINAGE EWALE E*rrE1G 10''Anima 1EE 2.+P..Wl pco•SYNNOCD eWry..., 4e »cry.,,xD ,,,, i NI -a-:3/+'co*TP++Drn ACCESS MAINTENANCE EASEMENT ;, I� _,OI 01.:.I 0... :soTTG,coo AltonoNcoo-:-]L rT+'•. �LDrrcn:.D rVG Wee Grt • seo:+bFD U.&cur BD,no. 30 PIPELINE A TRANBPONTA• 110M 1• 1' 11 4 �` �' Ab .GAOor:NALL AN,Nra NUTTER. OF OL AIM GAS EASEMENT ' 6[ISTII6 WA:WYTE 4 111`Q .A rMfi GAd AND(fJTTEY LUI.MLE “" 11I-2 j I % ^ Belk-A ' N0.DESCNIPTION DATE II c.P.Pa,w.e .1-. �i I EK Z I •rtq EIMLDEq 8ROTNG EIILp110 O II 2,1.. 61 AE sO h e,c: Q I S I BUILDING 1 I I BUILDING �,� IO , I� /\ M RIVERTECH CORPORATE CENTER SITE PLAN DRAINAGE SWALE g �' II t 1;3 D _ RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES EKISTDIO BULDDIG n ff i I _- -- -- -_ - '(a•a ?0 0 Ir. bD mo :!•:M;', RENTON,WASHINGTON 1D' 0 PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE SITE SECTION A 1/50' .NE •-�.te 1 o19 NOePORNO. EKET NO OF OAT[ .re CHECK•T1N. TABULATION \ SITE AREA s435,600 S.F. \ BUILDING AREA s116,000 S.F VICINITY MAP OF ADJAItENT USES BUILDING FOOTPRINT s71,399 S.F. ,,` COVERAGE s27% �UNADOPTED 1."E° SITE COVERAGE s16% • WETLAND EXTENSION OF.' PARKING NACHES AVE ,-':�- • _• L. . .:-:`. .t',�BU/; STANDARD 3322 STALLS 7 Yyi=Ia_„: OpH COMPACT :zn STALLS(39s7x) ,,\ :Ric -�P +.. .tv"'s'"s.�}��'``�`','t cRN R HANDICAP :B STALLS U) \{`i,Z. hLNf'-9,tICENTER s'. " - A V/ I Z V' .-. .. -a"»��ROgO TOTAL • 1:54)STALLS a T•' "�3: a 1/200 S.P.BASED ON UJ �• t �0 •� � W q.1. ,•E,; '.. 15r_ • 92x EFFlCIENcr 1•. ?'OJ :� ���AREA WITHIN Z \�Y _ e r. I tgrArlik-46 1D0 TEAR FLOODPLAW VICINITY MAP • 4. 1 II MI �<�rr, Jf. : 5 1 h / i II 'NORTH SCALE TON OMIF�VIIE �` ',,.',737--'e` I l SITE .-. O UNADOPTED \ , 1. .�w.D ;1.2'>�,4e 1. . i' 'A•,.,l••. RENTON Z v O WETLAND `\\ '";, • BLACKENERmxECRA `' .•.n W Z q xy'4.14 cvfW....' ?: F7111 T-1f �� \ \ \. �\, \.. �Mofs�a 0 INGACIOSE ` CO W i / ;_\ \ _ ` \ SWIHCENINI Qfry k / F41JSE2TY UNE S 2y VANFY Z rd tDT F. 3 GENERAL N \� M TING 1'xiiP.2 LNES PPM 1 >-42•_���Ifl00 N- 10.:9'\ y'1DTi NVLODWOO TO EEADNGr OM 1:14,ALTINTY ,+ TOOTH - Q L I 1 O \ - x 6B S.00.W 360.00 ,/ TOaTM r `=Y\ �f��j� # T�,` CCilj ',,,I ��'Y I \"u 1, , ,�-_ -. r1 v IIII q'I► .. 7- 1!� oo DNw�P a cg ONW oD LEGEND. Z �.N �I`TIT \ ` LSD 1-12 Po W4S o TREES TO BE REMOVED •lc \ II s ;� 1.1.;,em). 1 1jai 1.00.4.i3 /'*/,,\\��.` V C• � •TREES TO BE PRESERVED NORTH ` __ '�...� ' "� -yea` fX/ aPATHLIGHTS 14 m 1 ��_ ' Q 11� t s� ONC gU ®BICYCLE RACK I s d �. 1 iTYDFXED EIDENI . � ��y \�NGTp Ea BENCH F _JI _ dip' ...... s I �" - `"--"vv---- 0-.EXISTING STREET LIGHT I p• -� •� �° . �� AA"- • O EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT k 7I — III1 5 . Ea• :I. �� � ♦ / O' 0+•PROPOSED STREET LIGHT II I 59 5 59 : 135' ��1� r//_ r I♦r C \pKs.7PROPOSED FINE HYDRANT 1 F I rug 1 _ 0 '-Y a �` -n \ I_CDrtb+w'.V D ,!•..Y„. iiii peolit 00 D a c 7 x26,000 S.F. L!' � __ 20' l MIN i OVFR. r 126' —` mow.,;°_ IVic£OEPrvFIXEAT ON 67,000 S.F. .N -no, 4111111 t. 13T' J 2>2. `�` •� KNK.1q&FS(rYv) T¢N¢E WDGGING .Onci , I:, I a5' If4I '1 �. 69-4• I D :" -` .. �. o -323.000 S.F. `` \� _�1 I !��X% II-- IF� FS. ..... I 'c� x4 gig d��19h�_4, ory 200. .,... .......„,,.._______„.„......._ iiiE ' '\� iyW L.. C 'G+Wa» 4"IF43F ONUDOp V'.`Tr.cJJ I,� 4' 3 o�� �I Iihr _ • 1 ` 01.,.,\� $$ ,ram .�. I�� Yccrtcnwcw N 2¢.wv'rr;Ta+wHr..e E szD+e e - "/ / i:' 2 . 4 IB•. moN4o, 'MEi I ,`,- / ,�. �YJ t,ES xl /vim. -•_,..ice. L L ' _ . - _ '—' 7, 7 �1:h —- lit :l _ ;1 , x . a.___,••. e _ •• _ • - _-t1.T.T.325.' W 61.6T • ^-• IfA I1• O NwILLUI •�.j�,'.sCTTHID �+ wEOEia+002 U E�iJ -+4'I ENAw EXISTING DRAINAGE SWALE EXB1TNO ar ME --_ ��y; 2LU LUDO IO'�e/w1Cq 4&.,N.u00D AID1TONu000 r.� �, F4'� Y-u �u Ni4 ,eoT-0N 2H+'wnON-IroP 'HIDE vpr� x-11 spc,rtaw.DW ACCESS MAINTENANCE EASEMENT •, I n O z I auw0ro Fx6TVG GRe Lilt y 3 v¢. ED U LUr 3oI TIE 30'OIL AND 8 TRANSPORTATION I+ %l l OnuODD �: I, pqD �CUES AND GUTTER OF 00.AND GAS EASEMENT P OSti.PR NAC E F Q `y ,i N.yDc�till Y IMv¢y�EmFN' SHALE w,l D7 ,..1 / 1 Q "� pHsrING w4B nnD wrrFx LIT;''' L�RH I S I= I 7 I c II N�SIDEtwL.K NO.DESCRIPTION DATE p J2 5118MT.L-l-1-10 I ;.I 2 I EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING'BUILDING G I I Q MI I IBUILDING I `Q H NACHES CENTER SITE PLAN BUILDING 2 I /\ pn DRAINAGE SWALE .I `I - �a THE SCHUMAN COMPANIES EXISTING BULDWG O:I �� ' WIC =p: 0 E65 �6D ,,-00 I , RENTON.WASHINGTON 0 PROPOSED GRADE SITE PLAN -EXISTING GRADE SITE SECTION A 1/50° JOB NO.88014 SHEET NO OF DATE •‘,0'40 1 of 9 DRAWN'S CHECK.pDX.. r 1R CITY Or RENTCN 1 ` SIC DEPAATYEMT Or PUBLIC IVORX9 / AML A NOT.Am SPECIFICATIONS FOR STORM DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS WATER NOTES 1. L C•STANONSTRUCTION SHALL 6E ACCORDANCE 1. MA N THE ALTERNATE I C S SMALL BE [N CONFORMANCE v I � n SPECIFICATIONS FOR NICYPRL PUBLIC S AND r SPECIFICATIONS O THE UTILITY S In ACONSTRUCTIION..PREPARED BY vASRINCTON STATE AND A E LATEST EDITION De T..APWAA STANDARDS AND GI T ILA "f w �ti'r ,ll• PUBLIC• A990CIaTIOX.3901 IAPN.AIAAx CITY Or PEXSON SPm[FICATIOMS. STANDARDS. I IS ITIeS SHOWN ARE APPPOIIMATE G. -- ws. -- -so.-.• --- -- r.v r,.P ,aa•.T..r, 2. TO VERIFY ®1M[BTATII�COLLEC[IOOOTFAFACILIT PROVIDE IES]GAINS Re Pr SEDI CORRECT AND IT SHALL BE T. O LOCATION 90 As TORESPONSIBILITY DAMAGE OR •u - -ss n.• ^s'^•- LACILSWTEIMS MUST EE IN ER NATIOPS DRAINAGE r.E CLEARING AND DISTURBANCE. " J••~, U m couaTAanioe AND MUST a MAINTAINED u CONSTRUCTION AND ], WATER MAIN vs To eE CEMENT LINED DUCTILE IRON else 1_ I,,,,,•6.600N1 Z N W • CARING A CONFLATED AND Se[POTExTWLPOR ON-SITE WING SO I SPECIFICATIONS 52.TIOXa A-]3-5R LINT OR D SEAL ; Me TABS..Nr ON, S03O.NTE4 CLA65 IC C MEN[MO AND TEAL �- 6 COATING COeFORMPTO SI OR LATEST REVISION. 0 O a ]. SRUB OVLOCATIONS Or EXISTING UTILITIES SNOWY AM APPRO... L JOINTS SO BE PUSH-ON OR NE L JOINT. BEDDING TO AND IT ALL CORRECT SO ASONSIBf LfD DAMAGE AGEiOR Be CLASS C. T'ArV.�nc •Lr...,ru« ``\�...nni Z W O DISTURBANCE. LOCATION To AVOID DAM 6. rIT..To IRON, a I50, -•v AR PO ..a=TOY. _ wa,a ALL THE TRUE L T LESS OTHERWISE SPECIIimOND CEMENT LINER.NG Ix 9 _ ._PW.a•.,. �' 2 TECONSTRUCTION COMMENCE Um A]T HOUR NUT ICO SHALL BE IFICNATIOX A-31-10-1977 NSI AI11-11-19TT O P TNEEV CONTRACTOR'S PRIOR SO STARTING N.CONSTRUCTION. T SHALL BE O ALL LISTING HALL TO D IN JOINT ORTYPICAL TEMPORARY MOA.OWrY KOTION Po'uvel M> Z CONTRACTOR'S TARTI NSIB[LIRY TI SECURE ALL nCTEL BE m. FLANGED JOINTS SHALL B DRILLED IN RATION, E W ` {� �,Don,A•• _ PERMITS PRIOR YO STARRING TAT..CONSTRUCTION. IITY OF IRE WILL BE PoB 16S ANDCIF SHALL BE DRAWING. LB.R CONFIGURATION, UNLESS STA.lee.,-,•v rO sr..L••..e \ \ _ SHALL SE B A TEOREOR'S RESPONSIBILITY THE OF POTIFYI. I McERWtSL ePEDIF[m ON OMW[NG. Y SOA'a INADVAorB ♦ ii UTILITY BB SHE }R 31 HOURS IN ADVANCE F BACRFt LLIm ALL 5. AL WATER MAIN 10 INCHES AND SMALLER E.MA MINIMUM L \ `. seem,v. 48 W F. CONSTRUCTION. Co ER OF D LARGER BELOW FINISH MINIMUM GRADE. P 48WATERN.MA EL1] COY INCHES AFgER aUTIL SE AT A CC JRD FINff02BC : IO2T1: OCCURM TO ECTING6. ALLTED CC INEPePRESExTARUBBER SHA ENTAT' MIL AND TWENTY-FOUR W CONTRCTANDARD to IBILTY CON9SPUCT[ON. N e. DIM.• r MS •emOttlG!re seal.L Be 1-I/I nWED Tee Ptre �� DATE UVe51 VIM 1a aNCTEe. D 9. ralJ.An ax RLl seso Pex Fes cirrvor RENioe,AxD 4 ,x -` '':': --1 �, STD.INDUSTRIAL a COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY e00 SB ) T. a Psr�.A TO. xerM^B ro Be Aa�cO a TeR Toe 1 d. - ' s. ..P , 9L ' .AI il SP],AUD TYPE T Ii-C CAKE BASINS SMLA•B PET A DARD 10, No NNOLee,VAULTS, OR NETER BONES E LOCATED IN 1 E +]9 PLAN NO.SS,WITS APWA STANDARD FLAN NO,T! RAM APO OM R SIM.., ;�' IF• 1 AND YPS 60 OUTLET T.P.TIPS III-.INC.MANSOLE SHALL at L • �WA.at ca�v6> ) RRRR PM Al.DUMAED NM TO.34,ALL MI IDLES BELL MVN.. 11, ALL CONNECTION'.AXIS..M BE ACCOx ISO !R R,e,M• u g nS•L 6.6 war. • yy Aa.. •SAPDARD PLAIT TO. TS PIA.AID COTM•In COVRA WARTED CM OF PEYme�aLl.XBCTESARY TO AND w ER[A49 9 wT.0 Mr) q G�Y,M,n� c.o< Y' Pd •DRAIN•. SUPPLIED E CONTRACTOR AND BE ON-a[TL PRIOR TOTO I .._eaaM moo w _ 10. raI ZOR Ie•OLMT RS5POEO[•Y FOR SM TRANS,METEOOE Am NOTIFICATION. Y e I C►1. a C C P Y C V s a.e.T P of _ P EDOUCO M...PROC..ATE.............ATO 11. mem- o.nu BE ACCOMPLISHEDWI A ROPTEEMwaamVO Or THE •r.s.s.Ie r.Am u•5M.'n OMR.ON WM CONSTRUCTION Sir[. CITY OF ReRUn, IS SHALL LB E COMULCTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY C pp 11. 6A•ITART TOM TALL 3036, 72..s: Jáë 13.m!0Eme roars iiy::;;o TOIRAWELT IOLTIM. 16.13. . moacLTM PIPS r:TacsvaTAce WAci•UM I 215 OOOOeLRA M 9! OSe TW. b3TT, ..•COMPACSRD.1.8 MUTT FORM 10 ANSI.1.5 OR ANNA C105. T '• O n Et2nD TOR O.I3Pt DIA•eStO OM TACT SIDE OF TEt KPE OR TO 1S• 09S[tlG Tl[5!INCH STORM DPA[YAO[PIPS .I M1 fo!]^ .aRIPA v.aw a N W S j ± ? V Gil rTE•IDI OF TIT.SALT.RA.RAI.,e SO COOLaIN STE FILL OVER rATBR MAIN USED IN CR 7 P IPE B••LL Si MO MIT AN DOT.... SHALL ITT CEMENT LIKED DUCTILE IRON PIP[CONFORMING TO ANSI 747 S9S9 IY SPecr.carrose A-33-er-rise OR LAMS REVISION,TTRICF SS j u'A S M-i 14, ALL TOM DOIMPWTS BRALL M SIGH I.. TO 20 STOMA CLASS 53. CXMELT MORTAR LINING AND SEAL COATING SHALL DRAIN MM . CONFORM TO ANSI A-31-6-74 DR LATEST REVIS30W, PIPE JOINTS 2 1yI 1 r ' 1S. 1AN0RA1 Se•M r1A1•W.ED BRALL O]NIORTI A AP0A TO BH PU6H-OM OR Mla1AN[CAL JOINT.BEDDING TO BE CUSS C. s 2 Irmi.....,...P."............AP•A MumAm re. THE coat..R PROVED cr.Or REXmH Y Te am A9- I 1, ��P`'( ) Q ma.TO.36. OVILS DRAWING 10 re MAIN SYSTEM WHICH 1 HAS BEEN �- '� STAMP.AND SIGNED LI ENam PROFESSIONAL tOGINHSN. IT, IT BEAU RA:as•Yerann[L[rr Orr.e COOTIACTOR m Oa.. ICONTRNCTMONOTEo MAIN AS-BUILT INFORMATION CAN ONLY 1 (e an•K un AND AK OTT.,Ralasm PMM[re PRIOR TO ANY Be OBZZ PRIOR HE aS rd,r..,., w.•. ( �' Z CO•BTTOLTION, CO mIMTE T.WORT OBTAIN THE...FILL. INFORMATION PRIOR E. .A.0 V) I� v 17, ;LAM APPROVED DT INN DIO0CToa r FUTLIC TORTE SHALL TM TRENCH MCXKLL9.f° •7;A 'C) IT e4,.N.M.,... ee 60%1 M.N. y��. Vl Q Q.•11- rTEemesT wn ALL wren PLAWS.D TviTc.L aTPZou•v stair ow W r O Z U. xn STOAT DM3•AO NG TM T wnD P NS W SHALL TN .r...Tw ra y..-,la.�. W 7'- FILBnOCT[D 010 07 RO TO na APPROVED 0 PLANS WTICS ARE ON LA AT TOE FROM R R PPRO DO PLATS OF PUBIC YOU•. EN Q 1n OPPIOV ioT FaOM TR.APFaoOn PUMA WILL REppin WRITTEN • APPROVAL PROM TON CITY OF RENION DO...OF PUBLIC TOMB. 08 L.)' 19. A COPY OF T68! APPROVED PLOD TO.HE ON S9[JUT else V] u ...IACN9T000flOH IB I•PROM.. LLI W Z 10. ALLu'a mT'OVT LTV..cRATn STALL M 009010aED o.10 rear BELOW U Z 1,1 O II. Mo EDT ROAD MU..EDT UTILITY TRn®se oI 0EI0TINO Q TRA.L.ROADWAY SMALL M TALTFILLED DRAY WITS Z -7 W 5/I arm mama max w MEnu[CALLI 0 COTT..CO 1.0 •...ITT ASPHALT SHALL•••RATLI0 CUT WITH BAY :.Nf L6 =W A IIATTLDINTINUOUSAFT.,Lire,A rRAF0AIM OM CTIOATCH. A L) E MANd.. O TIT ASHAL e U 01.00L COMPACTION. 0 MWtO,LOT•[I PATCH SHALL 0•PLACED WITHIN IT Dale HES V.B:y1" RH.a••• I LEICaNY•OP T.ORIGINAL ASPHALT -'1 ICBOER I8 GOaATea. W TWO INCHES IQ]3. TEl COOSHALT00 SHALL nova. THE CITY Or Ren.Tr.a. oa NC OF Tn M.DRA[•AGN M.N.THE SANITARY AB-BUILT st�u um TM SITS GRADING texts Sae•E®STARRED AND JAL RRD STONED BY A LICETE=FROFEIEIOTAL TWITTER. CALL 48 HOURS �s ".tor ]I • • . T.Y. :.I.ETm.IL FmDINED F°.ALL SANITARY aRARA L1.TE. BEFORE YOU DIG • e°..,'�!; NONE B-22286 1-800-424-5555 i.4 "` 86114 - ,•,,6 of 9 • MIAL¢Lt coos r--We...,owo,HJ /-/L'BUTTERFLY VN.VE,Mu iy E--i<C - r ( AV VAULF,,A.NT itZ il I-DEADMAW CAW ELK I-Him HYD.YYJV,MJ-A. • t 3TA.G453.19.ET STA.0.50,1L T'¢T CSEEDECEI.3 PRIOR To CONNECTION INSTAL SHA Y.LE ROD TIbuGN OUT i co G••00LEP. MJ 70 TESTING CONFIGUATION,FIG I W/g-43"Roos - TN IS SHEET. REMOVE Ex.CAP AND C STA.a•e3.5o SO LF D"O./P MAIN. CONNECT TO Ex It'WATER /_O'uP,ma,3c•Lr TE6TINF I CONEIGLLRATIONg THIS 5RE DETAIL FIG.L a $ THIS SHEET. /-Cavee/F dOV01 .3 5•Y Z /-covueTt ecouT().sssi) /T Et.1L'D.I.P. T NEW I. 0.I.P. Q t STA.9.52 STA,//•p'o O3 _ Wo t WARP FROM IRTo I-1c'xs"7EE,MJnGL,rV'RTI _-o=— \ W OFF¢ R..eS ''IAfiVAL E,RX•u I 1- 0 NM — r /L" Ls. L• I S5 I- SATE OND MEIFR,lSkT P/<E N CLHA/T SLEEVE 2 L•ZO.155 1-2'E•TE WYE Po.eLoW-o0F,14-'CT =y I A-/6•-O•'-rz 1.2'/'1GTiR,DS SF I-/c"X4 RE CER,AK, F 16.L STA.6.33 0 1 _ mLF-4, � — FINAL CONNECTION HZ G•Op 0 he _ ��_ 1 IE• W Z I •='1'—=�=—" • —';,,:�1 --- TDx.w000 Ow CC So.STORM4 Wart STA.i.w,.s'aT. 'r !I{- T -�""N „e,ee —'C' .e _(� g GROLLrYG. t'AIR E VA SUM I ����__ \ I — ,.� ,�.b U.) $' A..EivEILEILLEAse �"` y l l i s,D D, m R I • ¢STA T•Tlio / • A.8.43.50 I Gli ieLE x4.I.P. x Lswer0/ASS I-Er&AT VALVEROSS,,F oi.4'RT1a Li G'D.I.P. PC 2-g"GATE VALVES,FLKMJ • I-2-Temp DLO W-OFF ASO? STA E•96b lO LF-g"DI., 1 2-CONL.SLK(62S SF) 1-Et-OW,MA,SZ'ET 1-6-CAP,M.1,]L•KT 1-CMJC.BLK.(T.55 Sc) 4sA,.• _ I-A LATE VALVE,Kx/u I-Z'TEMP BLOW-OFF AGG'Y '-Z'WAIECIIETER ZL'r.I• f "GATE VLLVE,L1•LT STA /6.59 AOAM.I. 361-4-2-WATER /-/6'xg•'TEE.MS AFL.,Wei �'I—EII THIS DOCUMENT NAS BEEN REVEWED ,EI T.o'I' {' Lc' o•K.WALK /-g'"GATE VALVE,FL R MA LJ v BV WSW AA1/TLL I,GEMDFS Nl0 O • /c 1n L.F. g"D.1.P N711oYEo RM DORSiI1DCTid1. < ``s,"s�T I-g"CAP,Md,3e•RT k 1-z"elves-opF ASS'v SOLE I.Ad an: 2/Eo/87 : i Y 1H.~EL. 2-CONC.gLK.(75.Sr) B- • E P..Na CANOUIT! 'MIX Ui Oo3 71 NNL TD ea E MZAIUM =I EI.uno ea Nis r.r.r ueevEe.E MO O CQ_—_ nr•�a°s�i•ar�xe limb m•WATEa __ � O B-•5,T-G•LCWG 4 tr t I, , -- \ FAT SACK FACE OF ELK. V�.14.'orIke !w pp e - �Q.TI1K cawLNa•.5•t• I-0" E•-O' 4 — L �� F i Awl p '\ 1 ■.�►/il'—Vp �' uxw 1/l ��� AEB.RIIII/ I"e ;• • •• /G•O.L-- SECTION A—A 1/rP ' • E O. o > -AG,..,-PnYv) • I n Q 'F J 7 F N01E:fCV/R...WAY a5-REB�4 4'b-"... P. O O T, 7 • u 7 N� - N 13 N V ?r WOMNRL}ED FARIX �e4' FCE Li G(CVX ',, (�'SM1N1�—� •Y w Z z Z 'FN _7 3 r NF 4 .00 i 14 •� 5E4TIONO 1 C7 '3 �99g ' irs i e 31 Flo --TWEE AO.a �: .18 al d ^ a>° DETAILS DETAIL C. W w Q �0k 6p �,.NI' X > A47 n.s ouaa 'Y zo ¢ A L � cc..s I r U a Z • > 0 J4_ _I ant aL.-.T, -- -- 1R z-L-0T Z z CM•RUT CL.e ` pI.R ,3 Oa WA,CIM NV1 E T� •� �a b•D.1. �, Al[1NEVrAl 1w CC N) (AFUi.woaA t I 1D S" � I •-�IeLLr•TLRE•T41 s. 7 1 .i-c,., - 91E a®.en Y c4.•OK) — vw°1LCM RD7E'FDO CDUVUNGs MAY ee Y A CeoO.AV/SNAG LE RDOD/AZ s/s TeM CALL 48 HOURS `p J T,PHD R H D {�-�w� wcX%✓Ewer LE E ef,caL netts o/o BEFORE YOU MG ..�. _._ s 1r< iri 54 81-27-86 DETAIL A 7•800424.5555 "µ}Gy ebiia •CAll: I•.A NAL DOD W-893 • :� 1•.e TNK AVLNOVED BY DIRECTOR OF FV_".n4.u3 c �� _ . —, 5 of 1n E 7- ;1 ..g. 37 L.F-e'"az.v G.o.1o14 ( • IG GF-E"O.r.i¢040% .yANNaLE M/3 . srA G.sT.s,'ssLr srA //.Jo,s•Gr 1 v GL •Z3A CS MANNOG61"2 Z MINNOLiw// sr4 P./s,A•Gr - Pr [C g �e�, 4r4 G.sls,!I%GT „ i/.ea na -- �ui�. NACRES AV «., .Goi,NW. =N 1�1� cuas,Sr.., u -- H z s ""'_ 01�, o / a �o CALL 48 HOURS W iJri✓i n.INNeti — f, ----,....'— 0-1� o e•�e BEFORE YOU DIG E_ Sri G.MN,7Gr /-eae > CONNECT SEwic mCb <-ro •v�0 1-B00-a2a•5555 H NYE., 20 4F••e"w O.401 / C s 0r r CO Lvov.Ec:sri'AV." 4s L v 4....o.ao% THIS BBLBME'a"-S BEEN REVIEWER <r,e•x.,e /Nv GL Jos wGr AND BYBBRRMEPE/LONSTRUTIOIS t._ (iA4PgI1E0 FOP COMSTPOLTIOP. aEE 2/10/87 1Mq Cr i1 .0 4 SCALE HORIZ. 1=40 �, 'y 01 VERT. 1'.5. / E ,. II .. .. ..... .. .. ... _ __— . . -- --_ — - _-- _ .-_ - — — 99 ix \ —J v — • Z a • . 1 � " ' p4 �� � I I � V Or �I ' ro.=c�•/el.,/ * s a u, v h a F < F 1 1 7�9 SOPlL•/4LT - I id Z 1 >,..e LG,ee Z 17 e.At Y.' `7 .. .. .. .. .... .. /i..eG.7eIG LGt.sor� ,Hv.it..6a9 a4n^EitE i .. .... �xLa - - JT PH gRH • _ .. V. : y � YTi •gi."` ''0 w Yq� 7 L I. ' . . . .. 4of9 .7.-a r • CALL. a<sm/ se, rrrer TAS<c / C/L-0R-SAC sn9LP-....•AS••o o.ma^6 /a«eo-e o.,a''• e,s/c> a.✓T arA OFrac> �K �.9�."'LT s.• eas 3 Ny c�•/a.e�+ PA O.Se.Ts .e'LT afE LNT 4 OF-4 F Tr%GAL PA✓LME/Jr-YGT/LWS • P eLa PLUG a eT>, :9TT E ;:c;? , iN4..csTr.-c LS. rl•LL LTA /0.6/./•4, 9B �" ;If NV CL.�J.»r CO,vNecr It.Pi.e K' /Nr.E. 9.1e Cu) To, C.c.• 1.SOT SL- %N✓6,••9.45 CS) /me 3LOLR M •I $ INN- 2" i-Et.9.�1 3L• /NV Eu a 9. i (U) TYPR$ 7.2. _ ; .Arc.. 8S5/".7TyvEi r Ert,sWDro)/LTiN=/1<'n1 1--_ :.„...W S6. EL.9.+�9 co) a �.r-�/ c L.�.L<(cJ y w/z 9TA i.r/I8 3c" /N✓Ec•9.29 C51 _ �v L V eTa �zL ��-- 0,. �' P,wPE-.vn</N a ,\ /z-iN✓c /a ee< s.✓••z Le-iuv e;<• ` rw) iu- eeav-•wm+w-� ��-e.� • lry�l� oue w.L �r > ,.-I..n -�e:ij 0 + L`� /J EY OTNfilS • 2 (PVC,scan wee ��� �� O t-�t — -;: o'sI• \ sr<_a.oa N C S AV E. U� -.•'_ _ -1 n p H E Z s_ YILE¢VE(NC,4HDOe/_ �' V1 N sal`w=eR �S_ ! - 8= ev'45p =���� -<1���.�/� o W =� H _y E �� N 12°1912 `IwI two. ��l4i `: Milli Re gel ) Si �-: -;'� W z 'S "...z - ` / NOT.: Q Z �n SA loo SOowA✓'eCeN I��' �0,1 ertwEWIF1>•••Qzp ,"c '�,—����i��" ro^�Neoo .LrOP PUcc P✓i1'r 2LCTIOU J 0NER5 ���i O<e ca is er.. /O.eI.TL 1 o%is so ea.vw<r " �d eAr oAe.w a'IOC_a Corra,wo 1. vR eue oe swc W/TN 2•cc. _ _ CCC WSlialliFil" SrA >.TO./e a 1 I c L t >z 'c wne0 B."4•..PHLLT CcneNT yU . / S I •BEFORE YOU MG srw a.eo�iT LA•207 CALLS@HOURS con i �tl ar- A•r 1•BOO.1 DEER GI • tf�o:o'w"Ar 3r. e.9,.re .,o.o. /N.L r✓ca'n I` c.rrc9 n s LTA / z1•Tti✓E<o9 ii LA/0 ASPHALT PwrcnlcNr BYiGODWYdf HAS RIDY GOVERNMENTAL IESREVIEWED S APPROVED FOR 9T LF rof� �--1 L 2/"O OSO Y. A 0..09.72 �YCfldl P<u0 .• a.o4 1 3O LAG c.�/0mil'er a 1/ G0 ,OUT TGe ANO a/Ol W6W/ �h •L���/87 g fL//1 EUO Oc TYP. MEN,SECT/ecivom,$E(yNN[I/G1,2 .0! 1 LF+•R/'l9 o.SO OF TEMP PA.CMENT SECT/ON CAREL EWWEG).• 51 r- CE....,.. e SCALE HORIZ. 1'=40' - TLF-'z••o/.00x ` y. • ti , .: . . • s v • v eF tit a---- h LD Oti Z V R% .. H-a k 'v`-- z„ , a � 0 .. .. . . . . . Uj w (9it'. .LJ1hH ' ., .. .. ¢ Zy `eQ .. _<Q P. -11 4 .. _— y-- fin 4 2IO Q4 1, rove n.oe r PCL.•/zao asa r-- ,. .... .. Z c11 Z ��,sr, os�.a _ O 10 -- —_y _ ,3z. �-- BS'„', - o�-FaylCC .. Z vw a F r- 1 a x�wa �o- i ac .P., I n»�L.f....e't. coN co I4 I.v c:d6-.4,-- 1------- B--o:I0 4, � --- - .1. 'o oe .a- 6+0.09�'!—_-� 1'O • - _ .... IS "I L�\ ov✓ e.co . v T. W/N✓,c:•9.e9 /N✓cc.v.ee 5 .. •R...(„_ wx1`ixi .. _ EE1 F ie N e<• `—T t .. : RHD • •... .... I O o O O o P.P1_l F q/ _ _ H"�.A q �_21-86 8 °, t F • 86114n rn o II I 3of 9.. . �_ /8- ¢— /8t • -----1 ii -J9 l!C ES AVE.-S.W. ----.._i_, �.. ` - I. L /v/ L ;,,s 1,-,, D •;; I U li ,. ,i�h l' _ 0€ „ , I ( r\i r ; m jig ;I. i �o P �' III I E. $ `� cF I I'n^r- // 9 41 rgnr ��.� ' `I 4-49: I" V°s U�//o^, I• C Alis r5 l' 4 , ,, i , .‘\\ ° ) .,.tv _Ii_....,,/ // j�/OiNtI' i;llllo X "Fg c�T /%// 11 : 1 ( 1.,..,_. P /,"��/ f'' / / is ; •'•�/�V///�///%(//�//�€( . Ir•NN, e! . / / / ---- __POWER A'/E. Wy S,I } / � / o,\\;µ/�,-.o.„. 1,IJI j�/ �'//// / • / • oil Ji / /b4/<//°� / g'' I I .I ' // '!. li// )1') .; / y(fi 1 . .„),„. 1k.,.. ,,. ...,,, 2 !!"/ //I/ II 1 i f° „— 1 1p . : iff -I v....,,,,,...„,4,:..,,,,,L,-;„,,,..... -t--,-7„--,. i j I 1.. 10 (// �I 1 fr. //////// • f �"roajwir .a 1,0 --m--in...-. lr ,3 ,.,,,...". 1.4121:.1061,algiffi?' ?: —-c— /I/1/ Po' ,i * , ,, =�;r , fitintX : r ., °e I SCHEMATIC SANITARY SEWER,WATER a STORM DRAINAGE �./�� 41�^°° �` r"'�" N . I NACHES CENTER %��' BUSH,ROED&HITCHING§,INC. 11 y CIVIL ENGINEERS&LAND SURVEYORS - --- p �° f ,�No„E top g BRH RENTON WASHINGTON