HomeMy WebLinkAboutTED4003775.46MT-
395
390
V�-A
R
375
V
-
j1
o
A PORTION OF THE NW 1 /4 OF THE NW 1 /4 OF SECTION 15, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M., KING COUNTY, WA
SEE SHEET RD-04
SEE SHEET RD-01 ROAD C
SEE SHEET RD-02
PROPOSED WALL
TRACT L
�'M
�
OO
�,�d
c0r0
'')
Ova
N�
M�
r N
NO
p�
tVtNO
't
cVrp rs
n
w n
00 OD
0000
00 O
co C)
c0 c'i
00 M
co
00 C)
O d
C" C)
din
Of of
►'��
In vi
O� Qm
-nwi
m O)
wi
ma)
�n
"Ifs rh
MO) Q)
M�
POI co
rn
Mn
r,)M
MM
►nM
r`7M
rnM
r�r,)
MM
r`)M
GI 2 WO kiip D"m Beft YouDig
t,.fte 81 L«0on car
�,�tf�0lilWA)
1 +00
®334WM SZ ENGINEERS LLC
s� 205 "".vWW "sown 1. 1 ♦ I Vr I
way, WA 98003
www.esmcivii.com
s 1 � 1 "m AnMectum
ESM JOB # 1799-001-013
I
P-
E. ..390
"ONC. BASE/COLLAR TO
3E DETAILED W/ BUILDING
"MIT PLANS
3"x 12" _ PERF PIPE TEE
TO BE DETAILED W/
3UILDING PERMIT PLANS
I 0 S_.2m •n
—�s
10.09%
XC
395
D1
375
N: 480466.86 180154.21
E: 431193941.619 1312357.70
IE=392.06, 12",�► 390.86
INLET PIPE FOR EX. DRAINAGE
SWALE FROM VAULT
00
z
ALLOWABLE PIPE MATERIALS
1. REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
2. DUCTILE IRON (WATER SUPPLY, CLASS 50 OR 52)
3. SOLID WALL POLYETHYLENE PIPE (SWPE ALSO
KNOWN AS HDPE PIPE OR HDPP)
4. CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE (CPEP)
R=377546
AS —BUILT CERTIFICATION:
THE ASBUILT INFORMATION SHOWN
HEREON IS BASED UPON A FIELD
SURVEY BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISIO IN OCT BER, 2015
2+00
3+00
3+40
7
N MAN E. ON, L.S. NO. 22338
DATE:
&
0
FIRST SUBMITTAL
ESM
7 11/1
1 em2W
voMw _ WD
HORKIMAL fm "a'7199i
DATUM
` CITY OF
RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works Dept.
1
SECOND SUBMITTAL
ESM
/26/14
2
THIRD SUBMITTAL
ESM
10/29/14
3
FINAL SUBMITTAL
ESM
11/20/1
orw+r. O�
4
MY1AR SUBMITTAL
ESM
I AT
F NOr ONE WM
SCAU "CCO10"M"
NO.
REVISION
BY
DATE 1
APPR
*
KEY MAP
SCALE: 1'=20' HORIZ,
1'=5' VERT.
20 10 0 20 40
NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET HOR-01 — HOR-03 FOR HORIZONTAL CURVE DATA.
2. EXISTING DRY UTILITIES SHALL BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED BY THE
APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AND COORDINATED WITH THE
CONTRACTOR_ NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD ANY FIELD DEVIATION FROM THE
ENGINEERING PLANS. THESE RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT ON
CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND TURNED OVER TO THE ENGINEER UPON
COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT-
4. STREET NAME SIGNS AND STOP SIGNS TO BE INSTALLED PER CITY OF
RENTON STANDARDS G012 do G013. FINAL LOCATIONS TO BE
DETERMINED DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE CITY_ SIGNS WILL NEED TO
BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO AS--BUILTS AND COMPLETION OF
CONSTRUCTION.
5. ALL TRENCH RESTORATION SHALL BE PER THE CURRENT CITY OF
RENTON TRENCH RESTORATION AND STREET OVERLAY DETAIL.
6. STORM DRAINAGE MAINS SHALL BE VIDEOED FOLLOWING INSTALLATION.
VIDEO TO BE PROVIDED TO CITY INSPECTOR_
7. PROVIDE ETHAFOAM PAD WHEN VERTICAL SEPARATION IS LESS THAN 1
FOOT.
8. STORM DRAINAGE MAINS SHALL BE VIDEOED FOLLOWING INSTALLATION
PER THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURE:
A) THE PROJECT DEVELOPER SHALL SUBMIT TO THE CITY THE CCTV
INSPECTION VIDEOS AND WRITTEN REPORTS. THE CCTV INSPECTION
SHALL INCLUDE AL PROJECT STORM DRAIN LINES AND CONNECTING
CATCH BASIN AND MANHOLE STRUCTURES THAT WILL BECOME CRY
OWNED/MAINTAINED AND ALL PRIVATE 8 INCH DIAMETER OR LARGER
DRAIN LINES AND CONNECTING CATCH BASIN AND MANHOLE
STRUCTURES. SAID VIDEOS ARE TO BE IN COLOR AND -COMPATIBLE
WITH THE CITY'S VIEWING AND RECORDING SYSTEMS. THE CITY
WILL ONLY ACCEPT VIDEO SUBMITTALS ON CD OR DVD THAT IS
VIEWABLE BY STANDARD VIDEO PLAYER (I.E. MPG VIDEO FILE
FORMAT) AND IS COMPATIBLE WITH GRANITE XP. THE VIDEO SHALL
REFERENCE EACH PROJECT DRAIN PIPE SEGMENT TO THE
UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM CONNECTING STRUCTURES AS SOWN
(AND IDENTIFIED) ON THE APPROVED PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
PLANS.
B) THE COSTS INCURRED IN MAKING THE INITIAL CCTV INSPECTION
SHALL BE BORNE BY THE PROJECT DEVELOPER. THE DEVELOPER
SHALL BEAR ALL COSTS INCURRED IN CORRECTING ANY
DEFICIENCIES FOUND DURING CCTV INSPECTION, INCLUDING THE
COST OF ANY ADDITIONAL CCTV INSPECTION, EXFILTRATION TESTING
OR AIR TESTING THAT MAY BE REOURIED BY THE CITY TO VERIFY
THE CORRECTION OF SAID DEFICIENCY.
C) THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS INCURRED
IN THE CCTV INSPECTION PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF
THE DEVELOPER.
VIDEO TO BE PROVIDED TO CITY INSPECTOR.
UTILITY CROSSING TABLE
O I.E. (S.D.)
381.64,
12"0
CR. (S.S.)
379.41,
8"0
O I.E. (W.M-)
393.86,
8"0
CR. (S.D.)
385.90,
12"0
CHECKED FOR COMPLIANCE TO CITY STANDARDS
w
s 12
nuE:
WHITMAN COURT CH/13/2011
ma m=.
ROAD AND STORM PLAN AND PROFILE Mew W_
PERMIT #U14003820 RD-03
18 "40
LU
c
=i
m °
�m
m-
UK
co
N 2
m
z
m
30
m
°
D
nm
°
! o°
o °c
m�
IE' ccn
$' D
�m
C*
i m-
U�
N2
z
m
co
o
D
liJ
w�
1
�y
cra��
0
z�
r�
W
y
ar,; IR•377591a