Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA88-064 I' i ,II dry, • MILLI P 81 Ql 1 I. PRE ra0'Ynaff- ex l lr lY�AOrS i • MC535 fA 511C14 •5IL � Wt ' \ I 01 ui MD 1 I .• - - + h'b.M%Cib SbAbM1LING IEENvtr i/f1 Vie'prwc eNw( , e. - -- .. -- - - - -- - / s o rINELrNs 144or ...=c..�...r:. ...-. / /. -lrw'ex- ---h--�Fi•(Ntx�I,CIIWNb F-.cif Pry_WNre) — --—-f —— — - _u ) —— —-- —--—--- • i - r �r pzr�e L'... c c cT- GL / q< c I. I —•- LYM 51Dp0'Ir FtGIiEF1 ■ Parts and Service Sales • �� "r ° Y"' �D E9) ■ I •'r o —__-I 'IL F7 .CL z5.S R o ■ ■ [Cs+.1FD RAW., / MIi 42 �J 1Lecl IAMB f area. I zod LiRW P�a LscT a, / • L a • --CAR.-sw.a 251 y LLlsYiRm lively) h / PI — fE L4 G C. C. C. Ill / Il LrR- • D. • , ' — �GN W--4H 6_- /I I/ I- G L... .. 2✓ L. PI�ft.A COKiNq' I�'e G 1� y I v O o e- —= / IF. _ a LI i'E _ I GMFY FO 3 OF ,•�¢irJcv w.L-- - t A ! m �I m 4 d f Wie Ge 52'WIDE rXr+ewr b,JT A �E{•49 y / uartso wu LnfMd) — — roM1 o.crne.o nI�H va rrw / 'C ,r _ , I■ GEPHA�FW,EFIJNryj THrg=aga�! • /� (cLG -D rrLq�� N IYM 317. _\I I// EN�I•eSiN+�'+ai Ir■r FF42M1 LIN54/.C�v6 CTfR) . J, =6] O COMEF u,,,,f Fi.Li145. ME �CAL.-�5 _-,[ 9WURct aIRD WirEL qte orm m'-&..o(T ) - -f(d N.e'7,01,4 .� / PEN-✓PD P+Nprli',cr.am I!r^T�WI Fa i+Hc FSF�a+HT) (�75Fl.AY ,�` ' .aLdo d4wleL CAR '•aL DIXL.AY j.� LPr•�.-P•I.ES CISP.Nf ( D4.s5ala 6 o/ I-� • a— -- a -- h f _ MIS rw �i, .. -,"— ,• -ly • * —�-- ... --� ,��, i�j�� NIP ,� �a./��W � :r �� .��. —fir —� � \; I —— —"-- "— f—' I _ rr II — w� — (— ao mrw E txn I1 a o F— — —ryy— — — —rF�GUT tt —�— :LEFT - - i ( r I t 1 1 • ! —: - Ilvf --VNe -�r+C— 5ra3 —11 �1 lLfPil V1JF-- _� / =R�e9D 9d, 3 • SW Grady vac —— —y --� — — — — — — -- — — — —i — — — — — — — — — — -- — — — / I Iw ,., , r_ .• . , . . • • . _ • ---,.......N\ _ • / l I Site Plan �.a .•�I-oil �_ Key I s • L.aHDYlP aiO IIJLLJOEG Iu IL�PTH tl��l `� ' ; l ; '•y }'P 1s.1.I�WpIN4 Y F a p■ • \))) • • 41L4 V4131-A 4 li : 0 it j fp: \• \� V 1�� \� \/ \/ �/ V \ L \( � Hop=A oTw°rrlG aW+xSl.lrs7lon 'IT �� C. '•C cm Cr FE,.IIa•rCLBE l.iwo) II•e-u I'- 5 'co .77—ter I i 1 CPR D16pV•`( • r 1 r m I,I� - (n +.rIr� ei-17•I I, PeAfa+�fl"dII4 -- taii (D� aoewlat \ �I-�,.I, 2 0l. __. 1 _. --- - r LAND • II F- j 4i I ELM— I 1 II p {�1L0 ��y�lr�� I I I t/, la•Di } .-r-o tl+ 7d oP t 2yl_oll ~ • • *Site Section A—A' �.Ls vbII_,I-dl F fi t Site Statistics e G BUILDING USE TYPE, i I „a h.. -. A AUTO SALES R III U _ _ Ia[s 1,2,ortl 3,as delineated on City of f0,Cm Short Plat Lb.100-60, Q C• • R-RETAIL G xv>adm v.tc King Comity recording w.exaaL9ad1,being c portico of: a. ua o-.as. , L-COMMERCIAL I R `• gaiterportion off Section t'lt Township tiara,Pangs .,�» .3.. as mvoal�l'.a•rl: ssa La.w.rnsl t. I Y That lot ard the Southeast ctomter the Northwest _ Z c O-OFFICE BLDD, G L mll w,w uraaam pl H _ W-WAREHOUSE L �� Wu U Il 1.I CI�/ OS-OUTDOOR STORAGE E _ _ A 022:57 et 01 Northeast comer tl raid ea distal q.ofta;thence smote, ! � U I',i+ m 01•xx•5S west almg the Fast lino tlexmf,a diararcn of 00 500 Lett ('" O fV7 D-DUPLE% thmv seam ld taint•wet,a thew t of 51ofo tees m nn ier Potent of ,avJ_ 13,605 r..sw .J•-. O I 51�a BL9ir.s 1,said paint lying m the last 11+a of highway(Painter ocoot s>mo rr0m. rri CD SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE W ?COO.' �/ described 1n easement 0,.0granted to the state of w..„+• •++by instrument G. wa® ® 2 I I W ' IlIINGLleas natal ILY R SI / Ii recorded WR31 11,1959,under h»dirq lb.5006790,rwmcQ of - i- :� m Monty,u•^"••,•,�,said point oleo lying m the North line of w fog ,, Iemae■tee pi. E>rifrgm,Northern twuaaet right of way(ud lase w1m)r . nmwe aaawLtl 61.161.67 n N O Cn `�. ' ❑ to than.L tam MUM ilso of 25cr former Sanong said d u is ine,a aReibay i re oast feet w. a�a NO:.o.a`m«'I I mew Tom said earth lira am ala,q me emm w oatistesterlr lines or ,. a�.m„n.: ,„.,, • ,,,,,,a�a,�l Q �0% m u Il O , C 2Odd @ 1 toKin u rwemc - iota I ' G�adv`Nov o�®® •� I IT x9nen.u,.touwirq instrument r�rm under e�omnhrq No. I a �., ` a Saud T/•]3.51•wa.e,a that of 19.Lo tutr ' Q q I tl�o Sart211x•.0119•0west,foO a 555(o thence o[103.96 Ceet to ma NortL 1Ln lofd yJp ...i i11 i ✓�IJ/• ..,t^.-.raedr I�r(10o tme.des)r South n•xe•ox•were along rate ems.maa�l a��a rn.mo m F • - a North lino, distance of 1294.30 feet m the Fast lire of that certain Lmo D. 0• ❑ a'.<sevaR conveyed m tin City of Renton by Iratxiamt recorded 10, oMVO mr REPAIR 0:emu YJm _f]_ I fA met under lira also Pomading No.6597177,rooada of King Candy,ans.i gtm,said p p Q thing an mrtmlmra of the lane line projected southerly or row.n re.nn.htil I- `� ,,2tn a Q Lird Averua(SO fees wide), OS G tffieo Nark outhe ly Faso along said use et of easement era the Fast e u. nraaene: n _ ❑ ❑ line of the southerly of aidfafanner projection eu lira A r o dlRailro l right o feet i�romm,m Ira rwame LOT a a,mo v I A rena.,ta MA Q❑ ❑ m 0 f et wide), e),n of said for®r Flslftgtm Nbrrh+m 1�i110 a riple of.rah• J ❑ (ud feat w1de1 r 43,349 Si Q name r.m rim v,eomaa pI [lemma Norm 7712711411 East along said North lire,a diatoms of 0e1.0 a"V'ms 12rt06.01`"'6°'°°e 62003 ARM AS_"gP11s A-1 met m the True Point of toglmlrgr Vicinity Map ea.1A1.296467c NKR 1.5.300® S/.LL IIl•nor 5iturte Is the matt of ling,State of we7a,grm. a. MLnwma svnn ae,LNo®. e■.w III l_ II • .'. •IRILin a nroclaESlC UT. LOT1 1 TOR ililIVM1111419:. '' n �, Iif 4Y*/^4 ` A• .C. AWIYTIC WOO1f1 O W LaRW (ITT(•COMOSPOO TO NOW.IOW 0[IW MVO} Lost l i1l0aC•A.2RCLOln.,CITT OI llROR.fO.T ruT■UW.■100-w,A. - ' S> MU?". ;inF'MOO MOW O M.LOMD[i•RD[.120417]001 MOM M D/KM COWL WES1•Rv. ' .. C.F. OW POT 1 A,, '�' s4 1. WRLLi IOW NEW. 7. WREST SOW WO{JI ea_ C` I,%•;.9,4 GI �ciutw Llal TOT.1A.•1 TO!.10.R ROn1 R- ,� r,�� •,01� .' ��(�I�f'A'.•M\/• Ia} R.P. RIO PLUME INV.•9.41 M.•4.01 L� �J`RRr / i1��%r7_'t1'9L/,1\�1t1 t�y •' '��C 1.1. ' RWW YY PIN - DEMO ` i`(s,',:,1 1 \`, ro �©,? 1. W1no BOER R•�1 4. WW1 YAI•WIRY [LrnAT10i MMMO.TO Cln w WNW WA, 011 ON YRD 000 1L1VR10I ILO eA. `�t14-71��,441ti...,1•1 fr,1`! 11111111,1112A 1 •;JE •� i L C.1. WOK W3• I0Y[R LI%OR (Ww) TOP•21.2E TAW WG1 OTT PI=1100E W.PAO 1 AW MOWN Al FOLLOW., �97' .t�•- T i ■ \ 1�tlra121 LIM ip•11.7A [w. 13.w ,'♦./��yL[ 1.�WRESYIY 0r M.•-A.0./• W[1llL lOUAW It m lOOnWS 17 100 W mIW[n 1A2I In L1CfT 1011 a m ♦CIAO+b"y" } M �+ '•---IIGK-01-NO (1) MOW YY WEST SUN Y LIND AM.1001[WWT 210 Ills•/-RDars w TOUMW OW NAT •• 1,� �yr�- 4 �� „Aif. ROW PAIR WNW 6. CATO WIN (In cmcc). }+[ �s 9L�� Y W-_JAIRW LAW � �1I� ( i'��lJ�` • ,/• ��• d e C.C. mC1ln CURS TOP.Y.AS 1%.71.1E y , -�}C'� ■ gr..... STRIP • POW [w.•RAIN M IW TLRW NW 1R 1 I II.oa W Y ERIOYII ,1,� I I•••1••�`•\/1■ t��I. C.D. taan YIn I. .SOY DRAIN 1LKO1 S. MO YAW RAI•D!1 YO NW RUWI.1, #` }f ��[�{Vs% I+=s.�• Iw.'�./tr1r1T.G n 1 ! 10,•I NM IV•]A.R TOP•11.01 i01 0!TOOS•lltT un wLT rw TWIIC•ICYL rou(I I lullTlaR• )LZ�1' 1,.�+',�,y1j� �O I'1].r.��I - C�[•7fl"]\��-. C.O. COWWW CO[i[R �`:i': •I • Pro VOLT W. INV.•16.1E [w.•17.01 11.Yf. C y//+ r-+ ( 1 q/•� CI CAR 110•PIn CRIOID1 P.' �;,l•'••:•ve 1 f. WTTLLI MOO IWO1 10. U. W.NONE MO felt WYE II _ _ C.L. WAIL in (l) e...•-WA TOP•21.10 TOP•11.10 TOF 0I RAIP Pun,AT C{Rt.,0•71111011111111.or K.KT LICK POLE • r- W •� -- F-�■I--1*-- T'I- �, [w.•n.30 INV..If.II (SO/OlV{T)611Ai10[•11J1 �rOl. �.��• I • I A i '*EOW CORRINATO �� WAR!In --4Yv6�•I[T ll. ZOOM fIYW W1O1 11. SAW A.SSW YIp1 SEW W[RIIOW]I N- I.4; r `�}j' I �, •• ! ' F • R. YIL10. TOr•21.20 (WOO) TOP OF RAOa 0L.ia•AT COT..ON nl ROM BIM OF Min LIORT IOLI AN I i r '0 ,, I �W�l�jrA . r • Cr m1WR{PIPE [n:-1].Oa TO•21.16 (Ill NWT).COATED/•11.70. / ♦ ! .... C.S. COOMO 04 11AI, TOPcO . .OIW.AI SITE LOCATION MAP i MO Y WINS -St-WliwT 1M. It. TTOW 24.7•WSIOU 14. D.I. TOP OF SOII1.[M 01 SWIM.EYES lAEYOu(OMLLa 11-Ill IUInTI 111TAT10• I. c.c. cotton Wu SIT nu In.•11.11 In.11.77 sCAL[] f••]500' X I1 LW • (WraW WIDOW) TOUOWl11`WIa12 TO W WW TAM fill tWT VAT Wilt 120R POT CM OP WaT WALK Y o lItF13.1110M RN II I -TWIIC LI= • IRO PIN CA/ 11. TOP-WI. It. OATH WI. Y110R f1110-f0. • 1-[c cmm1WLI M.•21.01 In.-10.1E REARM./ • 1 [1 LET 3•I 3• MO TO Ill AROI!11Mi FAT WO CA[.C.A.•.DATA. -. • 0.1. PAIN IRLR 1 00 RAW 17. WO WIN lb. COO WIN 1 TOP•24.96 TO!•24.77 WAS(F11 S90RT PAT), OIOIPO CUES -oD'--1nW DRA31 In.•31.51 1K.•1/.37 IOr 1•11,1W IOW MT II 5 LOT 1.34,060 SOW MT • • [ DI DOUTIL.I1.01 cm - MLR LICK 11. WREST 11811 R*0101.1 10. WTO WW LOT 1•11.400 2O(IW nR TOP•34.11 TOP-23.11 LOT A•31.111 SOW MT • -AC E1CTIICLL 03002 -} STWOT RW LR.17.11 In.•10.11 9u13211CI0n1: W. 131C RICY WIDOW •PC TViFYRt ODOR 11. STOW MIN PAWL. 21. CATO WIZ OOIn7000 UTILITIES 2110R VW TAM IWK FOLIC WOWS LW WE AO T2[0 11II TOP•34.11 TOP•13.12 TO SUIFACR 011E 01ES WWW nIYR. YR WOO Y L[AT[L1TT IOT n•ACCWILF i. W. CLTLTIICAL VAULT r� TWF[C WY INV.•16.A3 M.•ICU O1 CORYTISES.OF YID WOW OF WI. w NANDY . • WIR1c 1Y00R O K2LIn ACufl ]]. t•i 4'll0 WIC 31. IDIOTIC TILES VAULT IFw. O POW.POW. 21. SICW.L[GR WOW nR It. A.s'1 4.1'W. 1 -R-A-MO LIES • UT[L[n POLK , 27. TOWER POLO 01 1.16'C.S. 21. 4.0'1 1.5'C.1.l 1.1. I F.P. lIIIfW MO VAT.MAIN TOP-]f.n u F• SH FIWnR[ ,A • W MKT. 2/ WR N . 4.0'1 f .L.1'C .A•.T. 11. ISM.rou OR 1'1 I'C.S. 1 o TOP-25.3 TOP•21.11 Iy ^ So 8 OAT.OM 11. II^••LICR.K.T. 31. 11C•..LIGR,M. 31. 2I013.1.LICIT,I.T. 34. 4.1'1 5.5'c.o.6 I.T. I.I' O A CWESWALK II1DW i^ 31. 3'RIO W. 14. TWRC([PAL MET - O Si ^W hi D o >o 3 RI 74 I • SW. 7111 ST. . re I 4 e zr, / • NOTE: • SITE IS SUBJECT TO5LTTTTT CASEMENT FOR PC . g ELECTRICAL PURPOSES NEC. OY 12051905.•.0103001■ i- h .fi i , .I • ,I.. - . • ni II' .0 •l All I1 d/Q• • GL`4 $ 6*QW. I STORAGE YARD WITH • A.C.A.C,(POOR COMPTIONI SMALL SHOPS BUILDING /, /C' .. • • T . . A.C, PARKING 17•HIGH C.L.FENCE \D .STOUT CONCRET[RIACR/F•22.3e lll»] /r 11 -1YC1 /W�/ qM1' 12'CI GLw-L A.C.IGOOO COOTIOII SLAG R\[NNI[f L INVfN �S ROOG2 L,•35, AC.(FAIR COIDITION) ,~ '/ 1 ' A d • ./ M1. ss .9 M10 '. g M1ryM1 V 3 ' O DM1 ' ./1.. /' 11 �1 P. tit 2 A I 3 ry 4• / w M1 11 M1A 'C D ti ti M1 •i a l� ti S.W. LOTH ST. _1 "S s N RONTN LIME OF FORMER RONLINGTON NOR LNN RN NIW e.M.MO.• o r1] e M1 3 2.O B.J��a,> O OL 1 111 3 11. O • 11 O •.EL[ 21.20 ^ } ` d O'�•.J!_e'er �'7--;.,� 34 1 N •y, DI�. O'_ ----• , _.E. • • . _ •MET RO SEWER M1 TOE OF SLO E j•' .• 00. • DR Vf EDGE Qfe c CI BROKEd DO p -O/,. A.C. AA O M1 A.C. M1 M1 ,I I 1 I .. OM1< 0 +4 O } _��- 2301.00 `9 1 !1_--ti.♦L• n ... O -�`�7 tOP OF SLOP[ M1 Y��• • ry.5�.. O ]17.91 'I�O_-___ h'L 3 6 .1�_-_1=.•._____'1-` TOP Of yLOP[� �`79-]�M1�M1t•-,LG. .� ---'�l�l M1�� ^ ''ICI L}� CH M1,t M1 M1 M1 M1 M1! ti ry 7 M1O ry •�� M1O 11 M1 M1 4 M1 M1 ti ry 1 L' M1• .yQ..�Jf V l��•3`OI ' •, �6_+7� °" N 77.2T14•E 'D,ro•I10 wmc HETRO SEWER 1284.29 „i.'At ..TRACKSfMD/..uT$orAUo,1,Ir7, LINE EASEMENT )' bSXOWMitilerif LIN WED[WATCR REC.NO S]IMAB 2 30'WIDE 4 3 LINE EASEMENT ...SWOT FOR INGRESS L 2][A3EM[NT FOR INGRESS• I B O 3] _� iC, . EGRESR..NO.130TTE ELT S C.NO 02a]0 ! •NTHA INC OIA 'L1, • Q SO•WID[TNANSMISSIOM C / OF 1013,FNINGRES •S]0'OF[.AO SO'WIDE TRANSMISSION LINE S77•Z7'14•WR y, I va M1 •+ Of IOT 3.11 INGRESS•EGRESS " 'd LINC CASEMENT / A.:. 41 `[ 1QI!8 /ji : OERHEADLUNDEfGOWODRAINAGE - - _ cr a]05 905:V NO.aI0 '••••' e L .]'STUB` 3T2MT� �' , ti,. 83060]001a _ ,9 - -NV aI)]2-_.__ - •B � ' 7) - • WM/// P P - � CIMMIZON _ �'9�r J _ ��.�'INV•N.a3T.l r,_.INYc 1A 60 �� - -1..,..-JI �y --�A� LOW 11_----_.O-__� •ISLRi}t M1 i -T-fji - F23 LQV WIRE (, `"-- 1 i• II�ISEEMNOTES) UPAO' 30•HP GAS MAIN•Ei S77°28'02'W (}27 I I=10 (SEE NOTES) I �8 • •• 11194.30 • Syr (SEE OTE11 P�2 LINES -�-ye • I :3a.OS 2,9.99 t_T4 •59a • M1EL:15.61 .�JO' m • y1�=V �ry� � ��rA. ,LO fff '-_�• s + �y 6, ___. 1 "'-:7�� ' J - .�^..e_ ti �1 _ - •NTI7' 2c31.�.G._.44 iL EL.�2a 7I-INo� LINES III c 1 I. ryl A.22 •• . --(3Y___021`1M1 •p �/70. - ___ J - .. O •73 LIME �� ]C1-]• '10�1]L�fYI�•.LC1iL�O1CI-4Y•1:'�S1L f�110+If!�!. 'ILY�VA1�v 5 !•- O,L ...• ,L O v ♦1 00 ; el. • 20 9•J - o•ti _ .�-.__ 0 B•- O ry.s • O G 1 1_2.EG E2 7P 020904]SGR•CM M9-tea --'16.L• M1 N'• -1 r0 M1♦�15 M1ry O I I C. /....‘" •fir jyY-Y�<� ',+T-•Y 11 •� M1 �C!-L�'M1 )g -�-SLY _ .AG•1 B •,L�__ r M1___,_ ., .M1 - 1 _ M1 I 'I'jl J 2�-Sti�r .L r M1NL ll'+ �.., tJ ry 6 teM1o>�vK71i nPICA� IIi ! 1�/� M1 --'1_..,�I �ry -O♦ _-- ,L ry0 O --.�0 , M1O�v _y70N {I��. 1 Go ,,, N , M1 -_ ,RO O- ; ,Lb'` I a ill 1-L ® � -� --- b / I�VIII N • _ir/ ra BGG.,2•L. L>B•L w_• 1 S.W. GRADY WAY 0.C.L12•C.G'101UL • _o w O v I.--1. . ' il ›- It::, : -..1 /Lli 1./,4i 11W/ / Q Q •i I' (ns 1 IN a. STEVEN ,HIT HINGS L.S.NO, ] OM 1IV 1 I C-1 PLANNING DIViViON , Gilt OF RENTON DEC 1 3 1989 IMMO • ILGI--i-c-ot-e-X F-714 4 / daccr 4,a,, / Ld , e-t) c . 9to 7z_e_ ! //or-ot_eiet s_jee /2„ .... . Le.ei/o 14A-7,0(-cf-st-oe ,a;ze . Y- v/ 5/ Q-1-eie:tcec.;4 . _eke • • te ( il u Pid keic-z-a-ek Acz_Lte , e"0-21 (.te,a citn:ty 71x.A-1- 4 j,L A-eetei - ter-Aad y , d..,?i" 4,e; Zdie---, 7 e--(K-SE-247 .4 i-ke 77../-ofte. ~--frc..e„,<L) . 4,1i_v_et_x_S_ aze Vic, Gt.c_zsz/,‘,,,„ ..t4-eitiotet_, . : e-e-V--7<-42-e--Y- 1.4,ceed,r;Li-e--x----4-ei ,►te a( x - < ,,,e4.2 tit--(A--ec-&-fint:6,1 a-7frecz-4-r 1.-e-oc-i-e4:-.? • f_oret c.c,7 _. 0,:241‘.. ..7 ,1-.7z25,,--1 . A a7 t ( 7 1Ld4 Abee€4.ki Yin_ . 0 L-P (4A-1 /t-k-e 1?-a-e-e9 C...ec-c-, fc-a-ppt -tic? J.4t- c.t_ 21-0-c:14. • aec.eee. e---it CJ ° 7 X. C 6 c ?uc + ° - ZI-Q A.e44, , J ,t2zZe. , 0 te ,t,,e_< e_e__7-Li v_.,_:(.6_r- .,o,t_e_.-c A zt e- -e-<_i-,, (-,c-e-e-c_) 27t-eti,t-e-t4---8 ,41-e,,-, - af.e.- _,4_e,(17.c._-__ • q,...4,e_-;,.: —47 , /sOk3sz47 c/e,„6,„,( .).a_y 9 f 1 3 (31-/3/ `2-1- 2 5 ' The Transportation Planning & Traffic Engineering Consultants TRANSPO Grove December 16, 1988 TG: 88280.50 Mr. Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Company 10717 NE 4th Street, Suite 9 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: TRIP GENERATION RATES FOR THE PROPOSED RENTON HONDA DEALERSHIP Dear Roger, The TRANSPO Group is pleased to provide you with the attached trip generation information required by the City of Renton for the proposed Honda dealership. We believe that this information will further exemplify what has been our contention from the start -- that the rates for the traffic generation of auto dealerships published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation (4th Edition, 1987) are much higher than has been observed on a local , Puget Sound area basis. In July of this year, we prepared a letter for your submittal to the City of Renton to document this over estimation of vehicle trips in support of lower traffic mitigation fees for the proposed development. Our letter was based on previous observations of several local Bellevue-area dealerships. However, the City of Renton now desires a comparative study done with a dealership within Renton (specifically Sound Ford because of its proximity along Grady Way). Per your authorization, TRANSPO conducted PM peak hour manual driveway counts of the Sound Ford/Suzuki dealerships six driveways on two consecutive days (because of the nature of the shared driveways and service facilities between the Ford and Suzuki entities at this location, it was imperative that they be counted and assessed as a combined dealership). In addition, the singular driveway of the adjacent Sound Subaru dealership on Rainier Avenue was counted for the same two days, and the four driveways of the Sound Toyota dealership (located at the corner of SW 7th Street and Hardie Avenue) were counted for one day. The actual driveway tallies for each driveway are listed in the attached Figures 1-A through 1-C. As it turned out, the location of Sound Ford/Suzuki along Grady Way proved to be of little importance, as over one half of the driveway trips of this dealership occurred at the northernmost driveway along Rainier Avenue (the main Service Department entrance). This particular drive- way is designated as "Driveway F" on Figure 1-A. The TRANSPO Group, Inc. • 14715 Bel-Red Road,Suite 100, Bellevue,Washington 98007-3940 • (206)641-3881 The TRANSPO Crovp Mr. Roger Blaylock December 16, 1988 Page 2 Figure 2-A tabulates the Ford/Suzuki driveway counts in a reduced summary form which illustrates the averages for the two-day period and highlights the resulting PM Peak One Hour Period by shading the corresponding values. Figure 2-B present similar information for the Sound Toyota and Sound Subaru driveways. Figure 3 lists the characteristic information for the three dealership loca- tions surveyed for this analysis, as well as for five other Bellevue dealer- ships where TRANSPO has collected information within the past year. Included in this list are the number of PM peak hour trips that were correlated with each dealership and the estimated number of daily trips based on the PM peak volumes. Typically, the percentage of the daily traffic volumes occurring during the PM peak (referred to as a "K" factor) for the Bellevue area dealerships have ranged form a low of 10.8 percent to a high of 14.5 percent, with an average of 12.4 percent. This average factor was utilized to estimate the daily trips for dealerships where this information was not available. The lower rows of Figure 3 list the averages used for factoring of trip gener- ation rates for the conditions of considering only the three Renton dealer- ships or evaluating all of the eight dealerships. Figure 4 tabulates these generation rates for both the PM peak and the daily periods, as well as' list- ing the ITE published rates for comparison. Upon reviewing the results listed in Figure 4, TRANSPO recommends that the rate based on all of the eight dealerships with building square footage as the independent variable be utilized for determination of traffic generation for new or proposed auto dealerships. This rate of 3.55 PM peak trips per 1,000 square feet of building space (or 28.59 daily trips per 1,000 square feet) shows a relatively consistent correlation based on a sample of eight dealer- ships. Given the proposed building size of 34,500 square feet for the Renton Honda dealership, this would result in a total of 990 daily and 120 PM peak hour trips for the proposed development. Roger, I trust that this information will be helpful in your dealings with the City of Renton regarding traffic generation of the subject proposal . If, however, you have any questions or require additional information, please call me. Sincerely, The TRANSPO Gr up, Inc. 06:"1/4--1 • Rory D. 'Grindley Transportation Engineer RDG/ndl • Attachments ' SOUND FORD SUZUVJ: 12113,188 DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRJIVE4\M'C DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY OFljVEWAYF TOTALS � O0 �T � �F �T � �T �T IN*OUT �T � O0 �T � O0 �� T ' :00-215 1 0 1 4 2 S 1 2 3 1 0 1 0 1 1 8 11 13 15 16 31 215-2G0 2 O 2 S 2 8 1 0 1 4 11 22 33 21 28 43 12:30-2:45 1' 1 2 0 0 A. 2 O 1 1 15 15 30 16 21 37 2:45-3:00 1 0 1 S 713 2 7 2 0 21 01 2 2 4 12 16 18 23 41 3:00-313 0 0 0 4 2 on � 3� 2 2 16 10 26 25: 16 41 315-3:30 1 0 1 8 0 1 1 O 11 7 18 18 30 330-3:45 1 0 1 4 0. 1 1 O 1 1 0 1 1 S 12 18 S 26 3:45-4:00 | 0 0 8 1 2 2 2 7 S 13 13 2S � � - - - ' . . � ' -- |4:00-41S 1 0 1 on 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 8 10 18 121 14 26 415-4:30 1 0 1 3 13 16 1 3 0 2 2 1 0 2 2 5 11 1 1 40 430-4:45 1 0 1 5 510 0 0 0 4 1 5 1 8 14 22 18 21 33 4:45-5f0 0 1 1 8 2 2 3 2 0 2 1 2 3 S 8 15 18 44 5:00-515 0 0 0 3 11 1 0 3 3 0 2 2 1 1 11 8 20 14 26 40 515-5:30 1 O 1 3 0 3 0 2 2 1 0 1 2 4 1 10 11 9 14 22 O 0 0 4 7 11 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 3 11 14 8 20 29 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 1 2 0 2� U 3 3 4 12 18 8 18 25 ITOTAL 11 2 13 57 82 138 10 21 31 18 11 23 8 20 23 124 181 305 228 317 548 / - 1121'14188 DRIVEWAY DPIVEWAY 8 DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY TOTALS IN::our: TOT OUT: TOT IN:OUT TOT IN ODT TOT IN:our TOT IN OUT: TOT IN:OUT T0 � � 2�U-2�5 0 0�� 8 4: 2 G 2 5�� 7 2 1 3 2 1 3 8 G 15 13, 15 34 215-2�0 0 0: U 7* 5 12 0 3:: 3 1 0 1 O 2:: 2 11 15 28 18 25 44 ' 2:30-2:45 0 8� U -G 3 0 2i 2 2 0 2 0 0! 0 6 14 20 11 22 33 � -3:00 U 0 0 0 5 5 2 0 2: 2 W 5 14 14 28 :00-315 1 O 1 5 7 12 3 2 5 0 0 0 1 + 5 12 5 17 22 18 40 :15-3:30 8 U 0 2 3 3 8 1 3: 4 8 10 IS 18 33 -30-3:45 1 U 1 4 5 8 1 0 1 1 0 2: 2 8 4 12 12 26 3:45-4:00 1 0 1 1 4 5 2 1 3 2 02 1 4: 5 3 8 11 17 27 4-00-415 0 0 0 7 G 13 1 2 4 2 6 3 G S 13 G 13 28 21 48 415-4�0 0 2 5 5 10 24 4 S 1 1 2 1 1i 2 6 8 15 20 37 4.38-4:45 O 1 1 5 7 0 4 4 2 O 2 3 2� 5 19 13 32 28 27 56 4/45-5:00 0 0 0 S 12i isi 1 1 2 1 1 2 0 1. 1 16 14 30 28 53 5.00-515 O O 0 2 7 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 7 17 24 101 25 35 � 5-5�0 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 3 no 1 1 2 0 1 1 5 8 13 8 18 24 5-338-5:45 O 0 0 1 7 0 1 1 0 O: 0 1 2- 3 5 10 15 7 20 27 5�45-S�0U 1 U 1 0 6 8 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 1 3 7 8 15 12 15 27 . _-_-~-_- JlI7AL S 1 7 54 83 143 8 30 48 24 10 34 15 32 47 142 152 294 260 314 574 AVERAGE 3 2 11 SS 88 142 15 2S 41 21 11 32 12 26 38 133 167 300 248 318 564 'FUG.0 R E ��' ~K~�. ' U [�� PEAK PERIOD. �0W��K��&� ��K�� 0�� ' - - �� N N �� ' ' ' - ��UNl[S ��B��E��y��' �� l�� I �� 80�� K��K ��E��LERS�8Kp» �� y • • • I iSCIUNI1 SI leARII •. I 112/13188 1 DRIVEWA,Y G IN OUT TOT , I .L:0 ,. 0-L:15 i r-.2:15-2:30 i 0 —1 2:30-2A5 '3 4 10 2:45-3:00 13 2 2 3:130-3:15 2 1 3 3:15-3:30 !3 4 4 3:30-3:45 7 3 10 I 3:45-4:00 4 3 7 4:00-4:15 31 7 10 4:15-4:30 4 3 7 4:30-4:45 1 4 . 5 4:45-5:00 2 3 5 5:00-5:15 1 5 6 5:15-5:30 1 1 • 2 520-5:45 ii 1 1 5:45-6:00 1 1 2 TOTAL 32 42 74 1211488 • IN OUT TOT • 2:00-2:15 1 3 4 2:15-2:30 4 3 7 2:30-2:45 2 1 3 • 2:45-3:00 1 0 1 3:00-3:15 2 4 6 • 3:15-3:30 0 0 0 • 3:30-3:45 2 1 3 3:45-4:00 2 2 4 4:00-4:15 2 2 4 • 4:15-4:30 0 4 4 430-4:45 2 4 6 4:45-5:00 2 2 4 5:00-5:15 i 2 2 4 5:15-5:30 2 5 7 _ 5:30-5:45 1 3 3 6 5:45-6:00 0 1 1 • TOTAL 27 37 64 —1 AVERAGE 30 40 70 • • • FIGURE 1 -B • RENTON --- PM PEAK PERIOD INDIVIDUAL DRIVEWAY T1Ne COUNTS OBSERVED AT THE TRANS HONDA • SOUND .SUBARU DEALERSHIP crow) • ( 1 DRIVEWAY, TWO CONSECUTIVE DAYS) • • • • .• -4- SOUND TOYOTA 1211488 DRIVEWAY H i DRIVEWAY I DRIVEWAY...I DRIVEWAY K TOTALS 1 • IN OUT TOT IN1 OUT TOT IN OUT! TOT IN OUT TOT IN OUT. TOT; -1 ;2:00-2:15 0 1 0 i0 0 0 01 0' 12:15-2:30 0 2 2 5 2 7 8 11 9 2 1 3 15 6; 211 • • 12:30-2:45 0 1 1 1 2 3 7 5! 12 1 7 8 9 151 241 12:45-3:00 1 0 1 3 3 6 3 31 6 2 1 3 9 7; 181 • 13:00-3:15 2 3 5 2 0 2 4 4i 8 1 3 4 9 101 191• 13:15-3:30 1 2 3 2 2 4 6 21• 8 1 3 4 10 9 19 • I 13:30-3:45 2 1 3 2 1 3 1 5; 6 1 4 5 6 11 17 13:45-4:00 3 2 5 4 0 4 7 71 14 2 4 6 16 13 23. 14:00-4:15 1 8 9 1 2 3 5 91 14 3 3 6 10 22 32 !4:15-4:30 2 3 5 0 2 2 8 31 11 1 3 4 11 11 22 • • ;4:30-4:45 0 5 5. 1 0 1 5 5i 10 2 3 5 8 13 21 14:45-5:00 0 2 2; 0 0 0 5 6; 11 1 5 6 6 13 19 • 15:00-5:15 0 1 11 0 0 0 7 1. 8 0 4 4 7 6 13 15:15-5:30 0 2 21 0 2 2 2 41 6 3 3 6 5 11 16 • 15:30-5:45 0 0 01 1 2 3 2 61 8 0 2 2 3 10 13 15:45-6:00 0 0 01 2 2 4 3 31 6 1 1 2 6 6 12 !TOTAL 12 32 441 24 20 44 73 641 137 21 47 68 130 163 293 .• • • • • • FIGURE 1-C The RENTON • PM PEAK PERIOD INDIVIDUAL DRIVEWAY COUNTS "MANSPO HONDA OBSERVED AT THE SOUND SUBARU DEALERSHIP trovp (4 DRIVEWAYS_ONE DAY) ' ' L FORD I SUZUYJ GRAOYWY�' 138 8 G�AOYWAY T\�O'O�" O0VEWAYS DRIVEWAYS TOTALS I DRIVEWAYS AVERAGES � �� U4 �� D � �� ,rr TOT �� ,nf --01 -- - Hl i0-I]5 S 4 10 S 12 21 15 1G S 7 13 13 8 211. 5-2�0 3 2 11 12 26 38 21 28 ye 7 8 1S 12 17 29 .2�0- 1 3 4 15 18 3-316 21 37 3 8 11 8 14 22 3:00 12 S 21 S 14 20 10 23 41 4 7 11 11 / 18 15 14 28 19 315 4 V 18 31� 25 16 41 3 S 18 13 ----22 330 4 8 10 12 8. 20 16 14 30 5 2 7 10 16 2E 3:45 / 3 3 S 61 14 20 8 17 26 S. 5 11 8 7 15 3:45-4:00 3 S 3 10 7 17 13 13 26 4 5 8 S 12 18 10 17 27 12 4:00-415 4 4 8 8, 10 18 12 14 26 8 7 15 20 14 34Lq | 415-4.30 8 14 20 5 15 20 11 28 48 8 8 18 8 11 19 | 4-30-4:45 6 5 11 12 16 28 18 21 39 5 12 17 24 15 39 4:45-5:00 8 15 24 8 11 20 18 26 44 7 13 20 17 16 33 24 28 5.00-515 3 14 17 11 12 23 14 26 40 2 8 10 8 17 25 10 25 35 26 -"*'38 ^ 515-5:30 4 2 6 4 12 16 8 14 22 2 S 8 S 10 16 8 16 24 8 19 23 5:30-5:475 4 8 12 5 12 17 9 30 28� 1 8 S S 12 18 7 20 27 8 20 28' 5�45-S�0 0 4 4 S 15 21 8 18 29 1 S 7 11 S 20 12 15 27 8 � 17 26 � TOTAL 229 317 540 260 314 574 248 320� 56-8 � � --_ PM PEAK HOUR 7S 851 174 ' . ' ' FIGURE 2-A��0��N8 U ��^ ��N � �Um ' �� 7RMSPO U0U�U0U�� SUMMARIZED ��JK� OV��0�� SOUND F0RD/S �UU� K�EAL��SHUP ��^ ~ -X- 1-----TSOLRO TOYOTA. ; SOUND SUBARU! ONE-DAY TOTALS ! TO-DX AVG. i ; DEC.14,1388 DEC.13 U 14,1838 E 1Ni OUT TOT ! IN! OUT; TOT; • r 2:00-2:15 ; 01 0 0 1; 2! 3 2:15-2:30 ! 15; 6 21 ; 2; 21 4 ; I 2:30-2:45 I 9 15 24 ! 4 3 7 2:45-3:00 ! 9; 7 16 ! 1 1 2 3:00-3:15 I 9; 10 13 ! 2 5 3:15-3:30 ! 10! 9 19 0 2 2 330-345 ; 61 11 17 3:45-4:00 400-415 415-430 .4:30-4-.45 2 4 6 4:45-5:00 6 13 19 2 3 5 5:00-5:15 7 6 13 2 4 8; 5:15-5:30 5 11 16 2 3 5! 5:30-5:45 3 10 13 2 2 4! 5:45-6:00 6 6 12 1 1 2! • TOTAL 130 163 293 94 44 78: PM PEAK HOUR 45 59 104 13 14 27: • FIGURE 2-B The RENTON • SUMMARIZED DRIVEWAY COUNTS AT THE .11ZANSPO HONDA SOUND TOYOTA AND THE trovr) SOUND SUBARU DEALERSHIPS = = = = A a O = DEALERSHIP LOCATION BUILDING SIZE LOT AREA Number of PM PEAK EST.TOTAL (1,000 g.s.f.) (acres) SERVICE BAYS HOUR TRIPS DAILY TRIPS R 2 SOUND Grady Way/Rainier Ave 56.29 38.085 48 174 1400 * } v FORD/SUZUKI Renton,WA Ca SOUND SUBARU Rainier Ave 9.54 0.86 10 ** 27 220 * r- Renton,WA rn SOUND TOYOTA SW 7th/Hardie Ave 27.80 4.05 12 104 840 * • r� s� Renton,WA A el Sri ACURA of NE 20th St 20.50 3.88 6 37 320 e6 BELLEVUE Bellevue,WA cn A C HONDA AUTO SE 36th St 24.00 4.13 18 126 1010 * < fi CENTER Bellevue,WA 0 0 m u' B-M 116th Ave NE _ N.A. N.A. • 17 109 750 e2 rn 2 CHEVROLET Bellevue,WA c 00 MICHAELS 116th Ave NE 18.00 N.A. 16 65 490 = v Q TOYOTA Bellevue,WA PLATIS NE 10th St 29.00 N.A. 25 110 1020 Om CADILLAC Bellevue,WA X rn AVERAGES Renton Dealers Only 31.21 14.33 23.33 102 820 O All Dealers 26.45 10.20 19.00 94 756 *--Rough estimate based on averaged'K'factor of 12.4% as no other data was available. **--Estimated number based on size of service department,as an actual count could not be obtained. igg 3 _. . BONNELL 1VUPSERY fur/IRE /2 CON 'S ---- - _______ ______ ....., . _ . -I \ 'crwsr ESA": " N. • X Abliff FRAME -.- 4/qY.e/ . re-:"( . _ f.'•------ pie-Ss."-kw‘se-\---)( , -------;-- ,=- , M.H. 893.80 •i-'-.-„ .1 /-A4 1-/R01-‘.0? k : , \ C-J.t.K • - \1/2 - --- - -----\-- { \\ V ,,.., • / ,. \./ Ti _5-z 826 ciJ or rose-exsto TOZ,II41./1 P0.40 PA t CONNEC7_70N 5LI_RV_EY.... 0-/5 _ _a_ .1 ._......0._ ou.p. .22_ ._.•, :5AL L.IA 6 5_556:94-4 1705:7:1 7 TH „41/E. r . ‘...-f, •, _, CU/is-T.41A THVY/8 1 '" .. /..?. APIA__ ,.,,, , ----------- --- SD,- -----,--.' --C; 2:v . •• . .,,,,,4,. .,,.,•,1 , ,,:,....,,, • •,,,,...--.::e.e....._=•-e==-7.-- ,r,,,,,, ''••-„_____ -64..-......... .. f2______2 --x-----__, , ,,, - -e- A rAir.F./,'E/2'CONN, - ..--- -- ----..---------_____-_- .,,_ U.P. ,,_ __________ ____ - -W --______ ___________ - 'T - - --__ , U.P.--L \ , t / ler->.-0-• ___ -7v----1- -----:,..-1 . _ __________ /I 7 / / 7_ \ 1, i ,._____ „,,, -__------ ,,__________ _. . ___.._________________________ c s, , , --1" .. ./ It .4,,..k..1 kb 1 t 11-1/J. AA/111All //111/1LJ a 1 111 1.1..LIAll...4.114, , -/--. . -'''-:•;' ,-t.)1/....-/,\ --- -.-----7 ; . 1 -11 I 1 ts)k• s---.50.41NG NO. 7 // ,. / •" / 4' l 11 -11,,,,,., --.--1.,- ''''',/- 57: ,I1"1 40/-9 ---, EL./22./0 • u R 5.H. /1/.9 5 I f t i' . •• ,_ --!.....„--------/ I 1 >.k.74'. • , I 1 ‘..• • ..,//2"- . 130 • • TYPE.4..P.O.\...e. TYPET 8 E040.0EST0,047/6.1./fine .4. .'"A 0/STURBED "1 ,,-0008.AL GEOC/4/b 1-0,e..+7•;TE hi:X5,4-,-;"•/C8Ai .______ _ ._____ 7-\ 0/.57/4-9.--1). - --•- e----e - „,-------- ___ __._____ e --_,__--- . .. :: I. 120 .,'"'-'---. 11 • -..4 OYEE'EXCAvAre 2,c1.-r•AXDREPLACE MTH Type A gic,e,-/a Amre.emz _ g::/- E,c- -61 '-,6 20 'i;.:‘:/L., I• , „F :)1 ,../.4CeE,."04-'7"/4".:X/z-Z.1.0 t_' ), . ....... ,- .. .-.1- /2"CONM . ,-:.;•.,7!JR E 7"CONN. '.',.,li.4:23".59...... i/.1' 1 110 t .-''' //V,V /05.r4 NI SEE .---- MIL/ /04.60 .,- 1 :11 !Oa" 5-0.C.:,06.5/ 1 100 . . • • , , ,i. 1/NV.,,.:-.L,._ 97.07 t lo N INV 97..64 OP\ . r.-..' t.;,,, •:•°:"' 90 . 1') ' • . • Z .4., 11111M,-) --'49 ik,-1 80 .44 45 46 47 48 49 SO 5/ ' .52 53 54 55 56 57 • 58 • • . . - • ---5,-;`"• I-: • it) Ex/sr WET WELL : :4, k I TRE/fe.s,szrrio,v: -%c/e. / . exl5r Q'L.141/44H -77 707/P507„(-E MA/4/7 • f"XIST PCJA4P STA. ---7 / 11 .. 1 V STA.-4909.5.09 TO ST4.-4-6"+.44.70' - YEZTICAL . •,'.- .1 J ST4tS7077•94 TO S7:4.67t...10 - 1/2-427744L. Z • • - Z. J'asseauivrswezrizz: . . . EN 4. . , .1 .51.44 7...:;072.91:400;r77.4:6...s..7.600:._78 zisi.r.4n.S...C_Ir AVE to • • r aP . A 1 24. lo- U.f? 24-"-; 5 "..) dr SD C77-Y 0e;"?E0/V 5PEC/f7C.477085 " ' • • T,.,..„,./...../. --- 4... .,_,,.,_ --' fir(---'1"9 _-", i 11. • ...It:7=- -• 5'_01 ••••• •••• .•• • • • 7-.....jp . _ . . . --,---% n .. ... . . ... . . . . ... .. _,,,.. . r . . ... ,27 i 4,...i..„,...„..,-,\.,.,..,.,..,.- • ............- , _ ..,.._..... ._. ___ ---- -7_ge=------ -' -:•••=6.-t-:-.Jr-•-•„-, . e'pe-Auessov: -.3"---- -•-; 'i 'l• - - \__:_:__f.e7.7-C._._ •• LN" ...-.....-- ............ ...A.. U.L.LALLI. , .. .- ."; , - • .. : / W G I qk . • _____ , •p• i 1 1 \------i U.e . ' . .>" \ _________-•---- \__UR MR- : PV.417.-"PAW -- - -- ---1--F-- •-; i ‘-ttl? '-U.P -BOR INC, NO. 6 -E,f/o or-ex/sr/4947/ZAVO 4. P/PE 01:576W,2 / : /,...„.....„...../-----\.../P43,1,7 Ae-P4/WE I , 0 H.RO/-//- zoi•cwsz --- -----I----. I ' EL./2132 CE.41hcf/T P,414enve,vr r...x .17)4 49+.95.09 TO.57.4.600cX:1 -49-2.38 • ,/ \- Al.H. ROI-/0 1. ; 5TA.61,455.35 ES,H7 ,Ii: .......• ,T,,.,,, %D.! ,te on STA 60000 Mail.67.'50 -41-/.9S / ; 5,-A. 57472.94 IN./74942-3E: (() - • / • Ai /7.5 9 5-3/ E./656,888./6 • _5.RELOCATION' . 5./658.402.72 • • 7.-: &71 ',,, CO.4:3 1.04508 EX/51 6',f0PC.6 WIN ----- (FEE.0/4,0.A'209 Avec-a/x.4 ra me - -) _L-,z.; -,...--i: t.:ro /40 - & ,-;-.,. .."-,- zoc-,4 SE/4/E.E'S /.3"..26'.E.4 ;-,--i,e . OVEREXC'g4TE 2,-.AA/O RE' Ace' ;yr TYPE A -A-4e.eF/LI. 147ER/A- -"--" MIIM=MME111111111111•11111111111111111111MINIIIIIIM 10111111=M11111111M11•1111M=MININIMWM1111111=1A1111MMIIWMIg 1-4,... Cd? 1-, L.% 1-1. J I Q ' '-', ,r: ', :- ----- ,-- ---,--.. r, . MI= INI=IIIIMIIIIIIINIMMNIIIIIMINIIIIIIIIIIII=UNIIIIIIIMI .1181111MIMMIIIMENIONIIMIIIMIIIIIIIIIIMMEMIINNIMIIIIIIIMIIIIIMI111111111111111M=11111111111•1161 -,r..., :-,,,,•::: i 1 a:......, , •• ,-- c 0 1•111111111 11111111111111111111111111111•111•111111111=IIIIIIIIIMIMMIMINIMMINION11111 S 01191=11111111•1111111111•11111111MMINIMIIIMMIMMIIIIIIMIIIIMIMIIIIMIIIN3 30 _ ,,,. ,. - - , . . 1111MINIONBMI 11.11MiliNOMMIE 11111.11111111MMEN • IIINIINIINIIIIIIIIMIMNMIMIIIMMMMMOMMMMNMMIMIMMMMMMIMIIIIIIWI ,--- ,,,-.. ,74.., ; ., . . ..-.. - MIIMMIIMIIMIN IM1111111111111=M1111111111111M1111111MMINEM =MI I COME ,IL azo D 11.1=1.11=1.111.111111111111.111.MOMMIUMMEIVI ..Le mom =11==IMMMMNNMIMIII=I== 11111111===.111111111111111111111= 111111=1.10.11111.1111.1Mg MILMEIMI IIIMMIIMIIIMI m.- E.sv 2-..; c're" *ti:i • --,.:, 120 IIIIIIIIIII inommi.... ..mmmonomemmissiMillk 11. 11111M INIIIMMII=M=IMMMIN.m... l"s 2 0 A +er r.:, ;-- :.. - SCHEDULE 2 miummimmummmommommommommommom 1110111111111MMINImom 1=1E11 misimis mom imin,4; it'A/ER 11=1=11111111•111111•111•11 •1111111M MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE MINIMMIIIIMEMIIMIIIMIIIMIMMIN111111111111 1111111111112- =IIIIIII IIIMMIIIIIIMMIIIIIMIN11111111111=1111=11111 '-- ".-i -1, -;z 17., SEWAGE DISPOSAL PROJECT IIIIMIIIMIOINEIIIBMMII=IIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIMNIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIII=11MrMIIMIMIIIIIII IIIMINEMEM=1111111111.1111111.111111111.11111111111111111•1•111111111MM111111111111111.1111111111111111•1111111111111011111011111•11 11111111INIMMINIMINOMIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIMMIIIIIIIMMIIIIIIIIMIMINNOIMElev-00- 11111111111•11111 ilmmENIMMIIMIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIMIIIMINIMIN IMIIIII=MIMI M=MIIIIIMIMIN m 0 - '''' RENTON SYSTEM MEMINIMINEMMIIIIIIMMUMENIEMMINIMINIII 1 ...111=1.11MIIII M111.11.11MMENOMUMMINIMMIIII 0 tt C44,,, 11° IIMIIIM111.111111•MMINIMINimminisminnome le MilliMENIIMIIIMINIINIMIIMINIMMIIMINOMMINNIMIIMMON ,i'l o, 44s 4" EASTSIDE INTERCEPTOR-SECTION I I imimm 4. s ;r „ STA. 43+95.09 TO STA. 67+50 ,00 INIIIIIIMMININNIMMIN1111111111111MMIIIIIIMINIMIMMIIIMIIIIMM111111111111111111111M 108 IIIIRCE.°°°6511.=11. IMEMMEMMOMMINIMMIMMIMMIMMIN 1 00 ° 1. o ‘`. 1=111111=1.10,11 1111711111rmimmimmoionommmwAmirsomm IMINMUNIMMII . ..............i.m. .....-- oe.......iii MINIMMIM- i- M--11INiTailliMINMENIMM.M1=lin 1".5.,% 4 7 E.%‘ .' . i°104. C*('\ METROPOLITAN ENGINEERS MIIMIMIIMMIIIIIIMIIMIEMMIMNIMIMMIMIMMIMMMMIMMIMIIIIIIIMIEMINIIIMIIIIIIINIMII.M111. MIIIMIIMIIMIIMIIIMIIIIIIMMIIMIIIIIIIIIMMIIINIIIMIIII BROWN AND CALDWELL MILL AND INGMAR CAREY AND X_____ A W BECK AND ASSOCIATES 1111M111=11=111111111111111MINII=MMEMIIIIIMINIIMINIIIIIIIIIIMMIIMMIll ,,,,IMMINIII=IMIIIMMINIIIIIIIIIIIIIMINIMIMI1111111111=11111 1111111•11111111111=111 MIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIMMINMIIIIIIIMIIIIIIINIMMIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIMINIMINIIIIIIIIIIIMMINIMINE MINI 90 1114,1104,[0 •.9 0.D ZrZti_f,_?±L6.C.-- -----,,* . Ce.,,e'e• .,2.i...,,A.--,--.-- .....-e.At-e....., _ 58 59 60 6/ 62 63 64 65 66 67 : 4--1:(;Ledic'-(Yle pap.. _p_ALe2p - --- p ‘.,, ......pp,,...c,,,..... •Pr•or•V/ es•c•••ii„, • AS CONSTRUCTED ------.-.-• ce--,,,r--,-.-. „.. --,.-t<--e-/-z" 4,:int:44(454-(T:i r_r__,, C .Al rm.:. •_ .,...:.:.... DATE DEC.24,1963 it..(-40W e //Miler.- - ........... ..__4 .____,.;- MAY i96L R 2018 . _34,AEI P 204 • PM PEAK TRIP RATES (BUILDING SIZE (LOT AREA Number of (BASED ON: I(1.000 g.s.f.) I(acres) ISERVI E BAYS (SOUND 3.09 i 4.57 3.63 IFORD/SUZUKI 1RENTON DEALERS ( 3.27 7.12 4.37 'ONLY ALL DEALERS 3.55 ! 9.21 4.95 COMBINED IITE TRIP GENERATION 4.50 N.A. N.A. !PUBLISHED RATES 'DAILY TRIP RATES (BUILDING SIZE 'LOT AREA Number of BASED ON: 1(1,000 cj.s.f_) (acres) SERVICE BAYS SOUND I 24.87 36.76 29.17 FORD/SUZUKI RENTON DEALERS 26.27 57.22 35.14 !ONLY I I ! ! 1ALL DEALERS ( 28.59 f 74.13 39.80 !COMBINED uTE TRIP GENERATION I 47.52 j N.A. N.A. !PUBLISHED RATES , f FIGURE 4 The RENTON SUMMARIZED RESULTS OF TRIP GENERATION ZZ2ANSPO H O N QA SURVEY FOR BOTH PM PEAK AND Grove ESTIMATED DAILY PERIODS I . � � � SIM FUTURE /2"CONN. I FUTURE /2'CONN. �/74,79.7.58 hW ::,4,,, Ot 11J1 /656.629./6 g o ac ' `/� 'p W yam. _'_ I 8.E`,i:/,`s;7 �' 7 2 2^•S' ��M• �Oa OO V AWE � ' +�+�- N77 2846E - 4i411'- - A/77 28'46'E .V 77'P8'46E �� L ' 40'03f/ST.ESMT. _-?P/Pf O!/.(RP.PP.#% j}-4o COA/fT. wr. �- + ESMT. mts cs. e� .• Cam. . -•�, ,-.._•_,-_ _.--.4-a-...,.._4. ._I--4.--4--1-.4--1.-4-_a-.--4-4--•- 1._I-_•-_.4--1.-1._1.-.1-+.1 • . • , .•---4--1--4-/-4--4-4-4-f-1.-•-._1-/--0--1--.-f-_1--e-1 • 1 -•-11-.,._4-4- --1--, • • • 2 Lit• E NORTHERN P/4C/F/C RAILWAY - '''- : 130 • .. , OVEREXCAVATE /2 ANO.2E LA CE iY/TN YPE A C 447E /,4L - 130 'a p_, OB/S/NIL 6POU.GD ey tt rt)j 'ni • gr '1 R Q 120 1ao V _5 h - h v, - /4 Y/t`/kVJ1J'/N''/tv�F/�.C�'r�- 440toy/F//.N/c/.n.w4//N'/N.,. • FUTURE /2'CONN. /NV/Q330 V P//URE /2"CONN. INV./03) /fa 4. • 1•00 - v /00 /084 5. 0000657 k•' WV 95.8E ,/NV.96.27 - . •, - -90 - 90 • .Qi, - _ / 80 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 .29 .30 _ji-- 32 _33 94 _35 • '.36 - PLAN AND PROFILE - SCALE'HORIZONTAL I"•50',VERTICAL I".10'. • ,7 1. 11" i I FUTURE /2"CONN. /8_//C NOTES • h I NURSEPY STOCK SEE N./75.06340 MH.ROFB----" V ,i S. t VY P RT/QV OF,UP,p.2 COA/S L TREHCH SECT/O!/'+ I.,h /R7/VO M.H. RO/-7 N. /74.928.97 yN W TABLE47.P/6HT �537BclSO STA.43f5�5.09 tt r ESIITUfEDEOBCOf/fT?VCT/ON STA.23r'EA/7832'f/95.09-EA/BAVCMENT o I K STA.37*75 1 E. /65Z 220.7¢ 44 P247.:E?./eYE �! SHALL BE CLEA.PEO. .2.Z.T S.Y.ILL • 2 Sf/BSEOUE.vT BAGL/FiLL: • W h r I PRESS FRAME ' R W h BELEFT/F PPOIT/CABLE. STA.23r oo TO STA.43r9S 09-CLASS$ 0�.� \ / I 0 5 Y BO.PIAAC t/QS Me SLAB• , n , O V R. 6. UNE 16QADE MRS Shi,41L BE a SI/?FACE RESTO.PAT/Ql/: • $ V 1 V $ EL.//9.4/ [. : :r PLACED aV TBAC!'slot-OFAL/oX/- STA.Z3#VTO STA 13r95..09 -L7/LT/VATEO.LPEA€EASEMENT • -� -'- A/7TZBt46'E N77°2846 E t m�--PONL7�_- /OW:. AM•EXGIYATfD.MATE?/ALTO 4 P/PEDESf6.V: _i�- - -I 7 -1 _I i ©0 J '7 - -•-- REPLACED.AN/TH 0 ,°/PE L� STA.22'OD TO STA.49r9S.09 -di-ZB9. - /{ t l\ h NURSERY'STOCH ALO//6 PEPMA./E.UT EAJEMEA/T --i' •-4O'ems,: ) `-g P/PE QU.GfR.PR•P/ ,--'/O'LrCS'l.E.fll. `.\ .\ 1 _-1 �Q • • . PIPE STATfON I TYPE - Sf2t" DiJA?Si7i0 //0.� . -r- _ESMT• Q -• _ •3/r20 • TREE 6 DES• 3 r - n�_ / a 70 S/LYER AMPLE B" • 22 ' II �r T DE 32+B0 EVERGWEEN-f' 2"T04" SAL VASE' S 11 LCULVERT. .J3"59 70 35,'70 S/LYERWAPLE 4"TOA7' DESTROY 60 I t- . . - . 1 1 11 I • 1 I +- 1 • 1 . 1 .- • 1 • I I 1 I • .• 1 • • 1 .I:. I • . • 11 1 • • M. - / 1 1 • 1 01 ^ J8 09 TO J8'80 TREES 4' SALVAGE /O • II E NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY lu V-19 34f�o BEECH• S' / CULVERT- CULVERT.: ` � V� .. 9r2S O2/E TAZSP2u/E 7 DESTROY -/ • FUTURE /2•CONN. 0 73 39/33 FLONE2/u6CNE2.PY 2" 3ALYA6£ / !� 39r36 CHEERY S' / • /30 ` ! ! 39r4S .NAG,UOL/A 4" / n - I30- 40.00 TO 40t.f TO C2484PPLE 4"T08" S n. O'7 W • Or SYCAMOREA 4'7' TO 6" LLSY.POY I'r,,1h _ O'/G/NAL G20UND • �� • Or60 " 6' / /� ti1 - POND - _POND - -.pdrBSTO41�00 R?OLA2 /2' I• 7 1 4/*90 SYC441GPE B' • /��//K""�/ ""-� ' - - ,4f97E:ALL TREESA376-/MTEO:4OLYAGE'SN4LL BE.TALYAGED BY THE • (-y mot-air O44/6P AT THE MUN/C/PAL/TY'S EXPENSE. I • f'/7URE I.. 'cONN. ///V. /04.20 I -Ff-'TUR' "COnln/ '` + `i'1 i ND _ �i" /NV/04.60 /"' '. SCHEDULE 2 _ MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE J - H • ,- SEWAGE DISPOSAL PROJECT C .: • /00 foe• 711115.: �` roo rf; RENTON SYSTEM . _ H CAIL0/NV 9G.6. �/NV. 97.07 1 ci1'..• Es.,4k,`e- • EASTSIDE INTERCEPTOR-SECTION I 90 .-- o .z 90 9f ��1� STA. 23+00 TO STA. 43t95.09 1 a _ _ 74, fsS/0NAI EN�� METROPOLITAN. ENGINEE1430, �10WM AND CALDMELL C�11[T "111Y[11 LMIILLL •ND IMDM�M• �11.11/�J[Ck YDOC111T[3 -- •MkDll[0 w•N•.•htl7� L/�ll.//�/ c - .�� 60 35 36 37 58 39 40 4/ 80 �-,/,� r•.. - riiy _ PLAN AND PROFILE 42 Ia -- / _ . .. 'G r,.N..lY,w-'r.mtn L.n••e. • AS CONSTRUCTED .6"6/mot. ....N... i Of*sr,«)�.,l Ui�1•..�,.�..,.... SCALE. HORIZONTAL I".50'• ,VERTICAL I •10. °••• ••• •r• ••••'•••••••• DATE DEC.24,1963 - :...„,,,•.,,.,w„„,,••.„,„• MAY 1961 R 201 B 33 ,. 48 P 2 0 3 Wfir k ‘ '' 1 .. fi " es71,4- ,t.iy ..,....L.-." i, " ..__p v!..9 T...9 . k 1 b.:A,, ‘t.:S. \ • / II .411;i•.., k. \‘'... '-- .. -4—. . , I '4 @ ® @1+6 s. ell ta T 0 4 #0/ -® ya i--p- cis' .1: t,..1. . -. , ... ....N : .: 4:-,,_, 7. I \ \i„.....( VI *11- .„ 4 % % I ' ' (1,1 .I 0 &t-g- it 6.-- , I'v9 Or . W/ @ii_@ _. 0 ' 7 . ' • -.. . 0.....i, I. :• . Q-'- . .. I..., . Lk s\ ::.:. , . ....-, ,, , ' ,„, „\ . eri,3t .k .. -.1,•..2:r ...i 1,'...' .-:%!.)..1:.:2:-... , ..„..... , . \tu.,...,..; ii l' .: ...V. '.• :' ;1 \\ : 1- , • e [ :. . ,. .*:.--, ..-..- . . '. L...; ;.:-.A1- I__ . ,,, . ...-"'""----I:::....: -.^..."..f.,... - ,......-• ... . . Iffi /17 --* -' -- .---------- . .,,.....- .; ,....,... .. . . .; .....• ' , .;:,...... ......... i ....f: '. . "i.•• : , i j '. ; • ' . , ;$ i ..•.... . ....,--...., ....... 0. , .. ',.. \\. •:.‘,. .: . .. . ..-... ......., . . @ (4..-• 0,...,c , , •ilp i ...0 0//). ' • sr 1 , i @ @ „.4,,,,g• , Qt .• .• • - (D. liP : - • , ‘4.''''.° ........, • - e . . i' ' 1\: „- 4.. „ . I ...,s .:..., ,:.• k /..::-.) • . .... <, i i • :... : .:. • , 1 . t HP/ • 11P/ . . , t it .4.,) 1/7/ .. - NI • °2/ ..Z /-/:5-1 P:=6-' ji • oO•_dr e+ 6^ ---- IbIO i . iSi'-c.' . 0_..] . V LLOiINli GL01Nfi O.OSItib G.1.0'SIN6 L} n '-11. �f pw .-T-' t7I *MN LE. OFFICE- OrrICG OFRILE. ,-PKii L.....,, r I FAIT} 0 OFFICE LIOSINC( CLObinb - I OFFCE OFFI[.E • • • II . CJ�hIN4 - _ SNpyJROOF.I O ' • OFFICE • CLO31N4 UP I . oFFIaS ,I.. •o• i� I 6RJ • OP oFF I Ofiir I I I I �� • 1 . I - - A x • • . ......, U I d.._ f '.. ! T o ■ : f I s . • LI031N4 I 4Obf 4 -.♦ �i. ,I ■ _ OFPI OFFIf1 ww • i r • . ,�.• ,e�, o 1 � ,, I I l cai/JL1IFFp F`IGE • om� I ' .. -m , • • -mm° �. — 7 I _ Q." 0 O. Q� FACE OF eCILDIN6 I r�7 R d VI 0 I , < �^M4Tul LIME � NE DIP FVXa1.�•BwE: p a i • First Floor — sales• '�I i a . %guar-co, III S . YOO_ I I NOf4N F d N 0'II I'-4 �r.6ri co'-di I• -4 - (YL11 — Ip l • ti, T.... McLICIE F1..ITML.G. bCRVILE ' - • F�+uomuc.G MPN>GFJi—V MFSI v'101AEJi Ilv, I. '' z 1 -1II. 10 I. . w N H H 111 11 i __ W/dIRM. 0 . .M) D — 3TAAC.E SF ( > ) I I I P� -I---___X-' DhPnTGH uoMlGa. I \ \I 'I I :p' MGL WWC iI RETr+5 I I I II ?RTS 0 III1IH�fIIf IIfTfH1fIIT IIf1fH�fTII IIfTIH�fIIT II�H�RII IIfIfHTIIII IIff�HIfIIT 1ITfHIf11I I k OYEWIbO RZFI�Ca'll'\\ I • — . . LL Ll LLIl H HI H ll ll ll ll IN r,...„ ••,,_, . .. I -_ I _ _tt1�— —I— 7 I cor CONFLR. Pp5 •. . I' I I I,�.I Q U ll I� ^--� 1 OPFIGG hKR, _ rA_' I Q�I� J • --- -- � ( f I , I I a t I WfrOIN6 ° 7• - • • IgW Q m > --- - -- �O ` '� O O O — — — — — — I —" — --- I p I' " GD IO I INSIALIL D N KzoRDANLE ' rJ H I— ,i LI rn co rnTN U1Y of A Vi7fcN g Y `1MTCH 4NE V- r c -� I I UNDERLIFONND STop.A4.5 s -U.NK oRDIPI AN4•- p 1 F- OL '• "'-I `` FD7PfED4F0 :!$c _ 1 ��" ■ • C 4US1E DILWIK�Et.at,4 r cc U First Floor — parts & service v6°,I A-2 NOATN . - I 10.. Of' t w 0 886r t, T n ON NO1N30 3O.&110 NOISIAIQ 9NINAInd [ : T . O O 7 0 0 0 g 2 . rikl S- e -� J J w - I 1 Q oo coo Qok�JI r a . E I • In I3 n t - I c L I Ti j , g - I \ moon-( \ .,,,.' 0. 1111 D „ i n • n s L ----� /E9 1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN ) .rJ. °'!'� ^�IREcisrEREo` Ca oPIwww Oy R ao wo. 1 o r. MCI. w.v�.�ow. o.r• n n o L , .wo• 51fE I'L!N FYPPo/N. b'w•Eb R e n t o n W e s h I n B l o n P . "---,1.4Asorono vol...u.GIAd./J/er..er-AcariTS)cf,C4:444.TILT-LP -PM.Op-.xurza MAL, !I ii _ ._ : I \ , ff El I 1 , 1 ; 1 I - 1 ElIldfl --- . _ . I I ,____I __ .. I , - _,_..--- - . ..-- ' !; i 1 1 . ,Pu0.4.%2PePtio,tr rt . " , - ,- - • ..1 1 . __ , _ . __.!___1 : -,--„-.- 1___ ., 1 la 1 E . .. c...r-cia.-oPP _ PAF-. 1 1 H . • . • • • 1 ii. 1, • _ . ,___, ....__, __ _____,,,____________..., .I7I - • . 1 1 partial South Elevation . _ . I 1 • z . ..,Y i • iii" • wri...9-suco 13PaLS a • I IL' z _ //,--_mks;:np•r.oP-Oar.....-ciLT-UP = s 0 ill I --• • , -7------ ---- .,____ __ . -, -, RENEIIMEMEll _ ; • - ‘.. I : MI MIIIIIIIMIIMI=1 MME11.10111M11 I ; , 1 • 1 .Il IMMIIIIIIMI .11,111.111111.1 .. .,, 1 1 - Hill ,,"____ . _ _. ,- - . , -ti 9 P:P P I la ca,p q P li .--.1. MEER Mill MIMMI"MIME 1 11 --4' ' 'i l' 1 I R.P in li p.r, P I P d ! ir- l' ea cro) pa rem a zr I itawili iiiiii Egligiul _... 11 i i . . . .. . . .. partial South Elevation _ East Elevation • -F1 • 4p.r 09-za....T;t:r•Le —I 1 -.bropP611 / M;rt-a--.11Y-o. 13.4.101.5 ;://—t4P,onlfur op-oa,C.rusue l ,, ,i) z g , ,..H _ . i / CI 0 /.17 CI El 11111111±1 i • ii, 1 ___, I— D 111 I=1 0 . El - , ._ • III 0 EI • El El El 111 _I - , - , _ ---. _ _ -..-_,.•.,_ _ -,.....,_4..-,...,_,-.-,.,,:„...,-,:.--,—"• - - . DODD D 41"Ir • Ila West Elevation partial North Elevation lot __._. 1/4..IZZ__J . S . 1 . CD LD 0 , / _µ,Gar4r,y CO CO4L.T ILI"'tiff % . / .4„, m C7 LI Ell . . • I I l El 0 • 1l,„1,1 .IE E 0 D : E D 0 En .f<>.--,- , - -,LNit.t,.G-.. . ... partial North Elevation i A-4 11 , • .:14 . UO4BUILISVM OO ) U8H SAWN •NO101/.131 •ON NATO •NOISIANIN 5,1•I•51 l'or•Mkthf NVid aus .0.•orI :11 • ' • NNVIO2110 31.11,33 1 SUMO • I 13311143VY - 133HS 113A00 CI3d3ISTJA raiLiA 99.1.g . _ _ -o . - , din z . . • - •-•.•• , • Tb' -11rtir;.-7kan 14. • .• • .70;- • • • - 1 pe#A.141.1-ir,Priers a • - 3*k-0-F- %.•• 1-;_rir t • ' • , „et .1, 4h"•.. 414,4 .-1\-2. -- 4.- • -21'" •' • ••••• • _ . Apar •it - • !•14 1;..v cc .• rr•• OR-!:•.; ,1 EC:T5.;1711 VAI ROAr• • • a • x ›- • • • • • • • Li • • PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON NOV 1 4 1288 r) ECEI1VE • • RENTON . HONDA SITE PLAN FOR LANPHERE ENTERPRISES FILE: SA-064-88 (Yellow File) THE BLAYLOCK COMPANY specialists in land-use procedures CITY GI: RENTON F-2 E.: pvF, fiv PI 01 1g88 Bui DING z,.. a� August 1, 1988 Mr. Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: SITE PLAN FOR RENTON HONDA Dear Mr. Erickson: The Blaylock Company has been retained by Lanphere Enterprises of Portland, Oregon to submit an application for site plan approval to locate a new Honda dealership in Renton. Lanphere Enterprises is only very well known in Oregon, but it is the the largest integrated automotive dealership with both new and used car sales , leasing, repair, and insurance in the Portland Metropolitan area. In Oregon, other products sold by Lanphere Enterprises include various types of motorcycles and Honda power products . This will be Lanphere Enterprises first commercial venture into the Seattle-Everett Metropolitan Area. Renton, located half way between the existing Honda dealerships in Bellevue and Auburn and with the growing population in the southend, is the perfect market location. The project proposal calls for the construction of a 34 , 530 square foot commercial building on a 4 . 09 acres parcel of property. A sales office and showroom as well as service bays will be housed in a two story building. 10717 NE Fourth Street,Suite 9 • Bellevue,Washington 98004 • (206)455-1550 Renton Honda August 1, 1988 Page 2 Additional plans and documents that accompany the Master Appication form include: 1. A Site Plan at a scale of 1" = 30 ' 2. Environmental Checklist 3. Project Narrative 4 . Project Justification 5. Landscaping Plans 6 . Elevation Drawings 7. Survey of Property 8 . Floor Plans (3 sheets) The following narrative describes the project in detail, while the site plan justication shows compliance with zoning code criteria. If you have any questions or need for clarification, please call me immediately. Sincerely, c `>Ro e• lay ock ��Y o CITY OF RENTON FILE NO(S)`: sA-O(O BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .�CF'0(O4"8-tp ♦ fs © + mil *e‘Nrc0 MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type.of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME Y.B o b S t a 1 p • FEES • Lamphere Enterprises Q REZONE*(FROM TO )I- ADDRESS • _ C] SPECIAL.PERMRT* 12520 S. W. Canyon Road CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* Beaverton, OR 97005 C] CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* )� TELEPHONE ma SITE PLAN APPROVAL . )_(,,,,�t�,�" . ( 503 ) 643-5577 0 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q • VARIANCE* From Section: * Justification Required I NAME Roger Blaylock ; The Blaylock Co..;,:;,, SUBDIVISIONS: ADDRESS ' 10717 N. W. 4th Street, Suite 9 I Q SHORT PLAT 1 CITY B e l l e v u e, WA 98004 ZIP TENTATIVE PLAT Q PRELIMINARY PLAT t TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 455-1550 WAIVER f (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: I Eugene Horbach . • ADDRESS 7 108th N. E . PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: Q PRELIMINARY • f CITY ZIP WA 98004 ZIP FINAL 1 . . -4 P.U.D. NAME: I TELEPHONE 454-59.59 Residential Industrial • i • a Commercial Q Mixed 1 'LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS Northwest, corner, Grady & Rainier 0 TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING 1—��--tt PRELIMINARY Vacant B-1 LJ FINAL i PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: - New car dealership NUMBER OF SPACES: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE i65 ' ' SQ. FT. ' ' , ' ACRES - . �I AREA: 178, 268 4..,09 rit !P1 �79Q TOTAL FEES iF\; ,� ' -STAFF USE ONLY -- Ailaneiiibi N M"I fi•vi L r-nv%:-.ICZ;.zea:a • DATE .T�\. 1 '_y L ' : I!1;� ;, APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: _ �+ 6q' 1. �, APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: �A-AJ`�C fie• U,,,x G L l�1 �� 3 �__y,J 0 Accepted , I1.1'L f';:•,IC/e(7Ni(\, � Incomplete Notification Sent On By: L j L EPT. (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 0 Accepted 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) POUTED TO: Q^ Building J D• esign Eng. Fire P• arks I� Police 43 P• olicy Dev. 0 Traffic Eng. ED U• tilities REVISED 1=f1-Rn • Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). Lots 1 , 2, 3 Short Plat 100-80 NW Quadrant, S19, T23N, R5$ WM AFFIDAVIT I, Roger J . Blaylock , being duly sworn, declare that I am ®authorized representative to act for the property owner,[ownehr of the property involved t in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers nereinp�ontained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS / DAY OF 19 89 . • NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT r (Name of Notary Public) l e =r'-e" e n t a t ',v e of t h owner and the applicant 020 0 Y -P,&" , 0 717 A2 E' IM S-74 (Address) (Address) (City) (State) (Zip) qss-- /5.Z _ (Telephone) _ I Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Foxm #174 RENTON HONDA LANPHERE ENTERPRISES , INC. PROJECT NARRATIVE SITE DEVELOPMENT The 178 , 268 square foot (4 . 09 acres) site is divided into four functional areas : Retail Sales - occupies the eastern one third of the site. Both outside and in the showroom. Service - is located in the west end of the building Parking - for employees and service customers is provided west of the building. - for retail sales customers is provided south of the building Offices - are located on the second floor above the sales , service, and drive-through BUILDING PROPOSAL The two-story masonry, steel and glass commercial building will contain a total of 34 , 503 square feet. The showroom, which is in the eastern end of the first floor, is separated from the parts and service department by a 60 foot wide drive through. The drive-through will be used for both on-site circulation and the momentary parking by customers accessing the service area. The business offices bridge over this drive-through to create one building. The unique two story design was developed to solve the basic problems inherent in the narrow long project site . Even though the actual building footprint is 26 , 110 square feet only 20 , 698 square feet is within the building. The remaining 5, 112 square feet is under the drive-though. To create the height necessary to create a legal drive-through, the building will approach 35 feet in height . The lot coverage is 14 . 6 per cent when considering the bridging of the upper floor over the drive-through. cr .1 Lanphere Enterprises Project Narrative August 1 , 1988 Page 2 PARKING Both the interior and outside sales areas , along with the office space and service area demand a total of 93 parking spaces based on the City' s code. A total of 93 parking spaces has been provided that meet the City' s code dimensional requirements . These parking areas are removed from the highly visible commercial sales areas adjacent to the public rights-of-way. ACCESS Access has been limited to two locations on S .W. Grady Way. Even though the site has frontage onto Rainier Avenue South, the limited frontage and design of the building and site discourage any attempt to request direct access . Vehicular access was planned as far west of the intersection of Grady and Rainier as possible because of the congestion. The eastern most access , which is over 500 feet west of the Grady/Rainier intersection, will still be limited to "right- in" and "right-out" because of the extended turn lanes on Grady Way. The western access was specifically designed at the suggestion of the Public Works Department to align with the extension of Maple Avenue S .W. We would request that this intersection of S .W. Grady Way and Maple Avenue S.W. be given immediate attention. We believe that our dollar contribution for our traffic impacts in the area would be sufficient to allow the immediate construction of this intersection. Installation of this intersection would dramatically increase vehicular access to the Payless Shopping Center and the new developments to the south of S .W. Grady Way lying between Rainier Avenue South and Lind Avenue S .W. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS The project will provide all public improvements for sewer, • domestic water, and storm water drainage as required by the City Codes. When Maple Avenue S .W. was vacated several years ago through the site, the water lines and easements for public utilities remained. The building has been located not to interfere with those easements or the operation of the City' s utilities . Lanphere Enterprises Project Narrative August 1 , 1988 Page 3 TRAFFIC Traffic from a automobile dealership is traditionally focused at non-peak hours and most commonly on weekends . It is anticipated that a total of 963 vehicle trips per day will be generated from the site. EMPLOYMENT It is anticipated that approximately 50 people will be employed on the site . The building will be surrounded by display areas for new cars and parking spaces for customers and employees . GATEWAY SIGN TO RENTON On the corner of Rainier Avenue S . and S . W. Grady Way, Lanphere Enterprises has designed into their project a a gateway entrance sign to the City of Renton, with the simple statement "WELCOME TO RENTON" . LANDSCAPING To complement the "WELCOME TO RENTON" sign, the landscaping along both Rainier Avenue South and S .W. Grady Way is overstated. Large street trees a minimum of 3 1/2 inches in caliper and approximately 20 feet in height are planed to provide an immediate tree-scape. A gently bermed lawn area varying from 10 to 15 feet will be adjacent to the public right of way. North of the outside sales area on the eastern portion of the site a row of large evergreen cypresses will be placed to create immediate screening of the back from the existing shopping center. Landscaping will be strategically placed around the building, and within the parking areas . On the western portion of the subject site the parking area has been separated from the retail sales area by a landscaped strip. . , • , , , ..... • . • , . . . , • " . " . • • . . . . . • • • . • . . . . ' . • • • . .. • ,. .• • . . •• • • . • . . . ' . . . . . . • .• • , . . . • " • • ' . . . . ' • . • . . . • . , . • . • .. . . , • . , . • ' . . . • " . . . . ' • • . . . • • • •• . „ . . . . , • , • . . . . . , . . •• • . ' • •• ' • . , • • • . • ' . ' ' . • . • • , . . • . . . ' • • • . • . . . . • . ' . , . • , .• • • • . . . • . „ .. • . • • . . . . •• • . • • • ' ' ' • . • . . . . , . • . •. . . . • • . . • ; - • , . • . . • • • . , -• i ' • . . 1 • .. ,. . . . • . • ' . • ." . . . • . . . . o • . . . C".•c.•la'7a• 1.),,3, --so•ki vs as . % . • SZ1S : . ' .. • . iVb ?5i ' • . . . • , • . • , 4 3 p-,.., • . - . . . z x •. i i II .. . • . ' ' . . . - ., • . . . . . . . . . , . • . . ' • . . . • . ' . - . . • .• .• . •. ,, . . • . .. , ., . . . • . . • ? • . • . .. . . . . • . . • i • • • i .. . • . • .. .. t179 . . .. . . ,,„.,...il • , , 1 .......1 ,..4 .. . . . . "),..ii • . . . • .,0,;-,.. .,, . . . . • Al.,,,,d1 . , . . • . . . . . . , . • fi.a. • • . . . . . . . •,,,)1,.,j, •. . . , • • ;4.6,:p.,1 • . . . 1.',1',J.rt 1.,:e..r ir.,...'..„,...-.'''' '"' ,:_4,-Pr.-. I,.,::.T.y,.y,.,:qc•rr-:F.9 , ' .I 3,y,„ti;?,,`-..n:L'Il 1.-- ii.:1111!; ',...'-...,...*-,VI::,.•;„1"...,7,),-.,•p -, --'''';'-',4 ., — --,,r,5 ;1 -,,,;_,... •:,t_p .4..N.1-,\...-, ......,. ; („,1,? j! .,;. ...— . , s, _ 2.It_ ,z. ,.... f; i-;••' -..• ,,,,- ••••P).•,, , ..'•a-!`• ,..A''V•,'; • 71 p . • ' '"ti I;f:1113 i I I.U. —i_.4.7 9 i:1 e . 'i,;,,' .,„2:--"4.'„i,$;e:.;::, ii-7::::11; t.E.7.3•;,p ' a) • • .. .lit .. ;„;L--.-.. ,-,, • ....,.., .•• .. ,,,,,„,,.„ri„:,,F,a, "--11`.11_, , ' = ' ,s • 1 it• • • Mir' ,,,•1••'r••••Pia ..,,,,,.i•, x,V a:J.,:1:t•,a,".?--c . • • '. -,•-•,... .01 '')!F. ''':<-.7.--1 ,,°:..6.N., i 4::.,;•-.;0,..,,i1:1,1.1 ••••,. '!?-.V;.•,..,•- _ ,"' — • . ).„..,,.....•___ . \ ..11.,..1.:•: .i:,:l.. ., -:. •-•. ..g.„.,--„ .--,• g.,,,;,c,..+• it.,;•.i ,,,,., " . •• 0 •,,/1 W; „/ .),Vo'• ..'?,f li .114$'sN-3.!:.,..i, !.IV''';,1,.. k.t5e-,' C..,....s i . , = . . . . . . ;-.'• . ... -7.s.' ...'"`'%,-•\ I\ 1' •,•ii4,1;,..,•:.. .",•:)'•;1".•,::Tir.1;', 90. • --:• : .111.•-:'"4'-•'!-ts-\,„••• 11('Ili AI, .,. (..,„g ...,7,),..••::;,..S-.1,k,(7.,.,, , t.., \\ 1 . . . , . . . . . • • -• --- o .• 4--...,,;.•., •J..•••,,:i..?14.fi,,:3, ,••6.• . p ' * . . . . . ..._.......... ...,4.,. .._. ... ...6:‘;z .4r,..,,,4'l'io )-1; --. ..:. - • 0 9 t •-\ 4' •••••;,.3,7:',/ 1.•••...:•• -,.-.,,.,1,11_,- -..1,1,[ ,..:. . ! ; ,,. --,,, - - •`:-,..4,.i.c!•q' ...,..WE.Ct-ii'-.31,4.--..r': ' - • --. .. . • ' . •. . _____------,,, 7,4 .. -.,-. ',;.,'• -.....,;,-..-",„.1_"ar, • o ' . ,n• • , "-- 'lla- •' Va., '• -. Tbrie•' ''''. ''' - a .-. ' •L'•-" ..,-- .;•.„..•A :Aft:Jr:J.' ., • 1 II . . . . . 3•41:t.,, Tr;.".:, ,,:..,_.. ,r,..„ :' ;I . .= . . . ,. • .. . • . . , • .-i•-•r'''Pl' - .- —. ". - "•0(''..'"••••;i7T.:-II • . II .: re - . •ts-.•.1--jit.".-i'..-J t,!;;...' • ,'" -• - ,. r . _,,,. ,,,_ 1.,... ..._.4.,- A,;•,,-.r".34.-i•—.4 %-•„„-,...-_ .- ...• „..,„,. .0. ' . . . . . • FIT.:"1-).2;s:'.:,..q....!. -17,•be,, 21" iff V.••4.41:: .;•2.--...•--.7-:s'-'".4;1 i._•: ',:4.1 al-fi'l '3 " . ' a . LcuirtIEL_ eattie a assocuates arc itects -, 4 ii '::.op vveis harrier)!!! plaza- isoiath tower-22o..nee tt I.9 wa: nalisi (eoe)eee-esiel . • _ .... - _ — ( COVER SHEET , • ) N.\REGISKREDI. R • ARCHIIECI - .• I MEI TL11);113 . , 01.11.4V.IN . . • CliflIdl NAME sun•...tow . JON NO. sire PLAN •Fris...a.L. . .bb R.onlon WashIngton b 1No. 11.1•VP1101,1115 DAT• NO. 1.../11.10Fil• 1:10•11, ' . • - — - ---- • - - • --- . 1 . - -- , ' , • . . • • . . • , . ... . . • ' . '. . • ; i : , • • , --- ;• - I . . • 1 : : • i . . . . . ; - .• • . .• . , •"- ' I , . ! • . . 1 . : . r . . . . . ' . i r . , : , •. ' . . . • . i . P I , , ' ' .. . •• .. . I - . . . ... ,., •• 1 . • . . . . . . . . • : 1 ' .- . ; • . • , . , . , • • • , , . . . . . . . .. . : • • ,,,, ; . ' "- • • • ; . • . .. . . , • • ! ; ' ' ' ; • . xi. ' • . . . • , • • . • . • • . i ' , ' , , , ; ri , ...... 1, 0 : — 41. /. . . . c . • < • . _. ..... . - ! _. . . . 0 0 .. .. . , I 45-#1. .... . ,,,.. - . . • •4_ . @ro, i.i,,— . ,i1C----"---,,,.___). •• , • . m 4 ! C3 . ! : 45 11.i Ei - '. • pi qr 1.2 ' III r. , - • ' • ' . , ..... . r+ 0 Ill: — t* 11 ., , "---..........s„, ' r+ ; i . I • ---' 1 : r• coK -. :" k , • 4 i' D e ' 1: :------,. .------.---, • 0 ' \ , , 4' 1..._•___ I .,e T-- • ; ' : 10--t; : , ,,,,-,-Ft , L , ' • • . ; LND4-17.--, • . . . 1 4 t ,• . , • — _ i. ,:. i . •. (-•••••-•"'ir'.."•:7\-,.. ' se. • ; • • ',1 ' . • . ,• : :• ', )'!': ' ' ,...:i ------.:174.:7 , i• '0 • ci: I 0%% -11. t,- t t Z & , i! • , -7 . , ,. • , 4 ,...: ------, -T ' • --+ -L-- ' ' ' . . , . . . • i .,. ! . -.14,-i.,--, • , ,,,4 . .i....c..4.-- _3___.„ ---&---t • . , . .....____;_:„ .,. 44,148 . I'. n,l; , • ,, —........... , • . 4414 ,,4q --_- .; 1 ,•,, „ 411k. F- ------......„ --- .. . •• I ; ' r -- • r t 1 . .- : ';; ) ' • '1,':;filo 1 .! 'C . , , ' ,(it ; i" i., .,\.,..' . . . • • i., 1 1 *171,-`1, ... --- : • ,'.."":". ). ..' : •'.. -,' - I . ., , i : ., • , ',. •.,, , -<, :''.11, . '-. ,,'. . ; ! 0.. -",:.._-`4Ilk., \.,.., -'1• '-'"---- - ' . . . . .. . I , - • "---.. ' ' „ 1, -,.: .< 1 , : '• i I "" ;1 ' ; : . • . . NI ' \ • .• y . . • ':, ' '''' ,•••• i . * ' ' , p. • . e R. - - • ; • . f 1 M, : • . . " • • ' i - ' i ' --- ."—'- . 1 : . • • • , • c: . ; • '• ' ' .-j2' 1. '6 _,_____-A 8, P t "T.; • ! . • . •• , ., 1 I— ,,-,•,.'' ' • 1 : . , -,----- . •.. ,, .... , ::. ,. ., :,... ; ' .;:',.,:;.:.'.•::1 :.•• '•K,......................._„..) . • 6 _ - : . . .. . • . 1 • I 41 . * a-- --r•-• • ' . t,t. ‘,..5.1 •.4-....a—g_2;4 ve j_Tic.4,:. i R 1. , $4e . , .. . . . I. $ :. , i •:, g i . id. •, • . • ; , , . • -14 I • ''i I . . 0/ • Q 0,r, , . , • * I . , . ' . , . . ' I In — '2: ,.. : I. . i • a . ' . . / • . . ,Q.. . i ,i A . •k cA._ ,e,,,, .v • . ' ' *' 1 A 1 1 • • . • • • il • • co.• : 1 ' acn:.• iil I ' . As • - '. 1,9'... 1.1j • i • ,4 a 3, r ..,. . . i I • : . f.•• .CD 11 . . . • g . 0 - 3" •i • : I., t ' , . . . •11 ; • El ! i • . k . I • 0 • ,. C 4 . , I . . . • .. B Fg11.5.*Iiiii! 111;111111W Ifl p . , .., 0 . ! 1 IF 1 . • . , ,, ,, , , I , • ; , i '.1 . . • . • • e . I . . liii1 liq 411110ix RI' 1,- , . . . . ' 1 • 1 aqi'lle aq ROI eld0 R A• s' . 1 • ' i i 1 0 1419110149. lirtN '11q11 :'14'14-' ' •:-..-1.. 1 I . , ! ; : , JO' 4 . , "-: . iii' 1 R ' tililgU t." gnIlt :^:I1 51 li' ' ' - • 164: '. ', { i' : ' ' • !,.,640t im -14;if ii i 1 11 ._ ,. . . , . • • . ,-1' ( . 1 i'' ,, • ' ' ; ‘, V 1.- . • . • - , • n k 11 Ilf il rigUlgig la pl : , ' I , . . e . • , • 4 1 - - • L - I:7 . 1 a il lal ;i 1 liegg:ift- 1 N ,I1• : . ( ' • . I 1 V il vi di- 15101g 44 If li' .R 1 at.ligliiig P . . . • . ' \LI [ ../ \ . • 1 II CM' 1 III 111r8111 11111!14;941 11P1 el - a • _ I(' ' •• . . ,. . •, . q_ • i t . r ,,'._ . 1). • ' : 1 .• 1141 . .i.A. 12, • i r! 11 ilitgl il ii31 : • • . , ,; - 1 • -1--Z- .--- -1,•_.. .L__I',. .1! . ,.• • -'-4-I ' 01____I • 1 /_ . .. i, 411 u .. .111.. . .- • • -..- 1"-18L-......- ----13 • . . . . . ..; . . - . . . • . . -.. •1 --.. , , .. ca. . 31• - . . . . , i " . • •••• t .1. . I" . • I . O cD,, • - i clitglI...-0. • . , I t ..i• . 1 1 • • ! , • • 0 01 • 140 • • . . . - • . to 1 . ... -9. • ,-- ---- . • • . _. , • . co. . •, .I ' I1 ' t N''... • NIIII , ' 1 ' li1 . .. . " W • 1 I I • .' i 11) .• . . • 13 • • . I &i 01 I 1 . . . . . . 0, 111 • ,• , • 0, •...• ti • . r, P " . li $ 11 q,r1 I; • i 111-11 • F p • per I' f. :. rr 11 . . , Ilidrilifi ; i1 111 Pril li . tf • - , 7 ,'T'll& , v • ., 1 • -.9 i th 1:t 1 gi ll 4 1 1 ill 11 i II :. . " ',i- / .9! . ga IN111 i . 1 Pli r I 1• ? • i I MP its . 6 k 1 ligi • • I 1\ — MI I \ . .,_ • • ig, to. . . 1 i . , ... og 4 PRE i g till li 1 • • • OM i ! iiP • i. : 11 2 mi 'I 1 1 ' ' • .... . 1 . 10111 . • • • • • _. i .F .. .. 2 illt . i. • t 21 ' 4 6 ... . t • \\ . \, 0 1 I H MIL. frl II' . • L • \ . 4.„ 1 f v Dg q §ii . . . .. . . • -,... .a ii.er. 1 • • . • r c, • t 0 \N ' \,... If, .• . 4 , , . . • i . . . . • • •..-•-• ip ------_ •-. ' • i . , . . • • •••-•-, • irgiNii . 4: I. . . . . . . • . - . . - • 1G . . • . • ,, . INW.::__.4110 • 1 . -. • N.• . . . -- -.• ainkir di,. . • "...Is.. . ..:4' On Josoiot VOIRi.r_,..pii.p.iszei- a u ' '. '-. '-1- .. -7777771 3-0_6116--- t.-7 t 17._ct- 6, --.-'.-4-t-'-'-'1-7t-'--'-i-----'"'T------'.---'----i-------=--i'-------,;.',, -„ ---- - -- enick_e_sclEtleee-osiel (-!SITE PLAN, SITE SECTION ,VICINITY MAP. SITE STATISTICS ) S.,. Bilioa - ' .., Kama; >,, • -:"•, . . ' 1 .IDWILY111 1•13.A. ' \,A.ZillECI 11 I , 1 - ---• .--.4 . 0/13113'l AIM GRE.11.4-1 AFVP"....L. ri/i/a5 ' Renton Washington • 1 . • -__ Qr______ ---7-...., ...4 .“--77.—.,--:,.. --- ------- ' • • . - gi ' I Illi —_-_-',••:, . ' . , 31§ ' I I ..72, 'lo �I • ,` f1 ! N 'f o ' 0 I 0 I • v= �. .. ! • • N 'i i ' �. it rgz I • I • .� �, • it I I ! '• • • • ��-. , . o '— ..H. & • • ,� P. I • • If • 0 r 3• i • vv--a-1 al1,l�,a , P£ I ' I r . •T*7"'''--- i(AI 4 1 - -IL 1- 0 . . IZ7i i9C1A , . ; . • Pfl , . : ; P x o 1114��Illllllll • •1; :' ' ' . . : _LI " ,,,,, • , r ..... .. . . • .. . . . ,: . _ . , , : : .4 P... :'• ' —7--- 1 i . . 'A s CI ...• '* . = -_=- ;tZ I mg • i 0IL .' . . . .. .., . .... . 1 , . . . . 00 • • N• • ..� I/ • I I• • c•-••-•• O - __ • xn�I� 1 L: mil • --o _ . 0 • a .. .. , _ II � , -t �11 / 1 '7>-0' • _ d�� 1 I / :, Ir L • I 1r o-; • I .. . ' \ /69 - . • sR [rLlr 's ea fie yaasocia es." arc I P.CtS::= clop,`wriest he.i.rieon_ __ .__ pleze�eouth tower.=22o;;eeetEle;we a . .. . (eo . _.___e61e� FIRST FLOOR 'PLAN •1 a,T•g•1•66 D J .a.0 1T"ISI c IR onion ' W o e h l n p l a n .+os No. 1 'SITG Pt-,,NI PPP(oVAL b•I•Gbh p�V�IONnI OATS Na. • p•Vl/1aN• DATE • • • • Y . m • • • • O 7 a Ill 0 • • • • • lu . cri 000 0o T I • E : . . . . .. . . .. JI , . . . .. ADPmO • • '' • 01 J I /�, I , . , 2 . . i . . . . , , . • 1 ....: I . .. ., • . • . . . • . ., . . . . . • i • • it ; • C 11 I • • I• • .. ' .. X . • • • i • • • • 11 i;. • —Y. _. _t.."..._ra- -r-.p:�,.a�.,,�,;,a -13— `--�..,�..m....�CTE .P.te:e south tower:e2o;j.eeett! CL11'tIS ]e8tt1E''. &� BSSOCIBtSS•__QI"O�'. . ._ t.S boa• weet.herrteon ewe, ee119 (eoe)eee7e61e r SECOND FLOOR PLAN , 13.47•e a•I•Be, �� REGISTERED D eE�;,*��1�((��p7[ ewu .,.. yll �q� ECI W tr iC.^iF'IuC � oewwn ' �I/ / II t/• I woe..a. no n• - not o...Km•L4's .1 arli,F"&' '1�J 6IEE R!N MMoiN. 6•I•:b Renton W e e h l n p l o n . `no. wevlelone o,.t■ , . . . , • . . . . . . . - - - - • , . _ . . - • • . re . . . . . . r.! . . . . t . , .. ... ./06"...tkrweJ.J.E0t.hd-wibs ,...A...titsIa.Lana,T,Lr•LP -. - .• . . ..... .: : . . .- . . . . . - . . . . . . • . . . . . . -• ..-10, . . • . . • . - • - i ... .2.4......- --- - . , . _ . . . . . . 0111-7(10 . . . .. , . 1 . . . . , , .,,,,, ._,_=_,__ i l• . I I ' • I . I I I - pliil 11 . . . . i . . - ___1- _ _ _I. .. . . ._ _ . . • • I I :•..."1„. ..:•,F--,- -., :...: ...\•....,, . , . • - - — . . ._ •. I -, -.1-, ..-7.---_-740.... . ..._ 11 I ; 1 . 1 i i . - _ n . ,. 1 1 -! - 1 I I _ 1 - . 11 . . ..-............ ... .: . . . . 1 ri 1 . 1 0 : I . - 4: , . . . . . . ,. ' . ,,ar 113 . . . .. ... __ . . . . .. . - • •. :Nis, A.,...-,--,--=‘,.--- . • . .. _. „ ,1..,c 1 . . . ... . . . . . . . . . ' . partial South Elevation . . . . • . dr! . - -• - . . . . . . . ,r,71.1 z i • - . . . : .. . . . > . . . . . • . . . . . . . • '.:411 ' . -1, . • !.: . . . . .,-...o! . . . _ . • . . .• . 11-7(.17 • . . . . . . . . . • . , . . . . . - _--. 7-4 . . . . _ :,• . . • - . • . - . or-ezak—To..-o,uP . - . . . - ---- -. . -- - •• . . ' . :':0' • • . • . . .c? ..—. I . • . _ . - .- . ,...... 7 C,, A :'.:43 ' 42.,r• -. . . , # 3 . 5 .1 1 / El- 1E-' ' A . . — . . - -, ' --- c4 . . 3 .? 1 . . . . , . , , 1 • . . . - 1 I . I , . • ,i — _ , . . I 0 V•V • P V 0••V a C 0 0 Pr .i., _ or _. i . . • 1 i t - 1. . • R 1 , 1 i , , , . i I . .,,. p is, . ...._ .. . _ "--. ' , ., . . , , • .-• •;i'11,21 r • . : . . • 7i. - - - m; . gli . _ :3,' t _ 0 • .._ .. . ..- 'partial South Elevation• • - East Elevation . . _. -• • . . , . i•,- - _.._. . _ . . . . . - _ . . . . . _ . 1 . . . . . . .. .... . _1 0 • . . . .. .. , • z g - 1-- 1 A . _.___.. . . / _ 43, i, 8 1 n• . _ . • _ _ • . _ _ _ __ _ _ _ ,,,,., d- • o i ...._____ . . o a El _. El - . - AD . EIRI=11 11 I. • . . 1•11Y,---':-_ . . _ . . . .. . . . - - - • .. .. _ .. .. - - . . . . •-...., i=43,, .• - . . , - ._ ___ , , . . _. . __•la EI ----- EI L.1' 11--- -- ....- D__. _D..... lir_ 0_ El._ 0_ • El. . .. . . _ . . . .__. -___ . . . . . . _ I FIOEIII. . __. . . . _ • _ C144 13NoP-ozT APS. i l ,03 . .... 1. . • -,,,,,,_ . . . :.,,.._.,________.•,,.--.., . . . . . . 1 . _ . . .. • . . . . . . . . .. . . • . .. West Elevation • partial North Elevation - .. . . . . . _ . . . • . ' 0- . . . • - . . .. .. . _ ' :•0] .. ,,, .;. • . . • • -'14, - , . • • . __ ..- _ .E._.. ... _._ _ __ _..... ._ _ . ... / • 0_ 000E - o - 3 D = O._. __. _.__E __. • . - , .. D . U . T . . • ,nO 1..p_(o40.,,-,,,•;' .:..'_1v13,.r'1L...,.;-o,p.)„E1‘'I-,-P42,. -:•...'., .. . . . . . . i.,.., . . i . . . partial North Elevation • . , _. . .. ... . .._ . .._ __. .. .... _. _ ._. .. _ . . . _. • - . • i•q A-4 _ . . , . . -• - • • • • . : .o u USA . .o ll ..:;.: 11 i c)c) oD _ . e ) !: ?. 1 li Fi: 11 gi y.) . i'• )1 , Pi. i i ril ig 2 . , ..._............____ 0 1.1; ' 'i m ....._____ > r R1 • t . . . i . .: . .,:• •'.. — ^ 2 13 • ba asgp' i g; g 1 . .c,P.. _ /1 Q p (➢ I A ' �- - i .4 . •,...‘•.0 •1. : 1 1 Z : , �r •a EEGFJJo HE r-+ -- ' .1J-1 �, 1 1 •• e •1 qCC +n -;� � �`\ ��,l.sa.� 'ice . 1V11 1,4. .. ii , !s3 rif„'-,R 1. i t. ! , it:, • -, b �;]Q9 11. I'�mE 'S • 't S.' i ' co •• 1 . • 4 :. • i • i . r- . i I 'i ��a , '71,1 13. . I"17:*/: ' ':; 1' . 1 : ! I,'• i ' i i; w I • . -- / i ' -:i- - ' -, il ; ; ;• b 0 O a • i "Ma • 1 '': , • • g ' p . , . . . . 'R• . „ .. . g, .. . . • I 10 , . • ..... . r i ,g „.,. ......,o , gi.. i (2 '; . • • • • i � RAlN�E� %IyE • moo..,'' ;`�I I icktirtIS-__ ea'ttle S�a9SAgla P1�"S _alrol,I eo, S[ z 'ied wci[st ndi*IIMraaw,p�a:a eoutFti tower�ao lanttil8,w8 =Bs�lg__(_, '_ LANDSCAPE PLAN ; i d,.�� r ' IM IREGISTERED Eaul.•p=0' - n l�RL111I[GI G IG.""rizr:�; MYWN I [[� o tE1 St'•C iCw aNIaL KAM( id+LfW� �> 'SL b.MO. a 1 • I .„Y...." • H e n l o.n W a e h I n R l o n • ND. , •1•VM1or�• OATE NO. .0 VIEIDME• DATE Ia0[[o _0---�iY Yu • •1Rnm a IDIOC47E1C 0223• 413n1mD[ L +y��+,•J� c 7� :�� ` . ' R.C. YPW-n0 CDROEH e W t2Sa (ma C Wow To wow rTIX3 a m a0SR7) _ 200 1 T.POCCR 4,Tact nlr2,COT Or aar20E f.Gn FLIT Vona 100-■D,Y - • L'." \, �• �•;\ ��I "� '"7^uh •{:�' � I(r •Darla - • - Moat.OM..CoaD[t c,o[a f20t0)fal a[maa a tI.0 mom.raYIRLTa, °I :. 1 • I. WRYT WEB WtUl 1. WRYI alvD YtT,u 1. /�' • -a /.• ; C.T. COIO MR _ A� L i �1� • _�I011Dri on TOP•24.81 Tor-10.07 - IORa : J 1 _lA..f..l In....Ol � a.r.. iv'nP waaa won: �'�E-ls'-...- '- _ �A 7 . ICO14 11 .-� • �•OrTEL Lilt • TOP-If.1. 'tn.•11M _. TWA not an WIELD■a[31/.P.Ca]ASV a.RIW AlY IOLID•r: • ^1adkLr` - ( �_ . !. fSOY sr.n mamma .. ca20 WTI .." - 0211000 IQuut I•m TIE 203•2 COam O2 mom■3 r.s ra rota a m •--" r�. r-. ��• 1� E N I ��i F ! - ' • --umor-lug Pa) aLn[ID YL .ari■[a n LIED IIDOt Wonvm RO Mc•./-aom a■ooavm CYpi_YIi ' - ._a` �1F1'l 3' 'lR/BAR 1�.�(r�N CI -- - C.C. • CO.[tl2a Cal ___-JYI[O Lan 20r-0.0•' . ._, TOP••12.a1 _ • ltlt a0lrLS). • �'�.` Z.� .• ,�.. __.�__ _L__ .t _�.+� a - C •• M.I1.H S7a0 man ER rp•Ito Oil An Y rD{t°x■: _ rl - GD. COo[fi RIR mva ._ 1.�•`'�.! I• qy��`• .• :a' W y ill ��.1 IlY ). Ow WD wool 1. fi0aR DLL[[W41. -_ .. _ - aaan WL aOOSa 1: ••. - .., f J.- `. . r - C ,-' E' . i�- C_C. Cr4Ra Win Or-24.11.. - -- Sa.S).0) Or or a00 0232 W{■0L2 SO Ta.ITIC 11C{LL POO WS lnraf)IWO OM. .- - - 1L1 ty • TfC 10{.T IInL In.•14.tl M.•• LI I 51( v i i ��1 ::m "a 2 .03 t. WRYS ado.IElaa • IC. WIWI favtl%wall W.•Ila.mD 1: :. •: •- - rt' i I.-_ �- C.1. Clan Um C■) VOW•YL Tar•D.10. _ for.11.50 TOP Or•LSIL WI TLlit.•!cow,a 7ti■0■iI f[N or amtl L[CR TOu _ {�]'di _ -.1 -T_ In .u 3° Df..u.u • san■nra2)[tnzla-1u>. Ir � 6'ri I 7 ��L cat•:.a DafQiID NW i1R �0�' 11. WOW OW Y.QI, _ I • 1 • • R. WRYT n1R YnO[i WO YY WOO]: -_ N- / I R,'• F ':.�` ■ • _ TO-31.10 DEMO TOP OI Y[t Man,AT COO,°■TN■onL l7N°f Ni[R L1CR SOY �]II ' t.• CI WED On I. Y"oL • In._I].m �._ Tor.11.tl (m.am)Car1T1a-D.70. - r �i' �1�IS r'�Ir� �� • ••II C C.a. • o0rOZ2[sW. MO W ImO I. - •--• • OM a MOO •-O-WRYr lam u. a7m wv Y�la - = u. [.l. _- ._.. TOP ar mDl[Eu s W7wT nrn Yal°Il f•ouD'u=m lone)mYla S IT E- LOCATION, MAP `_•, " �....y�j .. 1 TO•24.0 Tar-If.■t 11Sa - r� C.V. ®m WI m LR Dr.•I3.1t _=,. 2•I.It.)/ 1 - /� • . 'tl iLD - • WOW YIi0•20 ,• - •m.0.1IE[I : S_L•L[: t••1!•O'- - • Oaa VW a Ip,IT,w ON • __--._• E0EDYta3 IOOI TO r.W WES now b1•S LY our OM 00,.011.2 Or _, - •"'a - a-2WIIL tIQ2 m 100•710 17. C•SO WD - II. CITO WI. _ ama 1100-a0. - __ •. r• _ ^ :�.: fit`w . - a_ac ..,�...... • .m D 2•r - .ln..)Tul .. - _-i'.-Juy .. • - --- - -- - •O7 • • • • m 2.1 r - • • - 1130 TO TT.•Ooft WOO IS•T ISM a a.C.ti.Y2L •2.1. a a.>u coo inn 11. MO WD ..-- .. IL OW WI. • - -. r .. - •4._ , a' D • arD mD L-�SOO pi. 3Jf__._._-.--- SA.Tt.R .-- ', ' COWL In.non TLLn): .-- �•••, a. Da 3>ir.-N.17 1OS 1-U.)Y TAW MT 01 mr.LL Da Rom- COW Llta It. WOW Lap Ya•011 - SO. OTO WO .. __. , -,- 101 3•tl,4W00■W1 RR , •:•MOW TOT . - , \. - .-C, a • CS[aiOL m[n012 + 1)012 110 Sol.1..Y ------- -- TO .2.01 fn 4.17.101 Wan PUT - • ; . 0 • tin.I).L - Lr. m.Y . 311011O0001: ,I.E. 12.02100.•00E011 AC---20.27001 120•0D12 11. OW D■1D WW2 .._ -- _ ... :O. OTO WO 2171 Ytlf 2/Dl sap•ItlLiLE tlmfa a70•1P.'Y0 RN .. -. J11. TO/•SI.SI TM•23.0 - So moo IDII 10tl•YY MOAT. n YION.0 1101L3R To 207012 T 1. •W. ^•^^t'1'WET TWOC nor M.-la.at :-- DI.•D.f) -..- a m_^•••e••O W■aoaa C•so. _ ..•► :. - � MOM aaeta O [Rim aca•a �. Y:• tl0 P•c - Y. 2■[II[L■IOat.fYtT , _ • .. yY(fr`- '_� • i • • own WW1 O. MOO LIQi IcsoYa Ma u. IJ•:fs•I.V. .-.. 1-\.- „c), `q[�`� - 17. 11094 POLE a G.I a•4a. T•. I.f•I f.7'C.f.•l.T. q i T.I. MLA.TWA Ym Ia1D • TO•nal •" .. - •. • - - .. l 1. rm Mann ■ Y1O Om 1s. 1.1•i•.3•[.a.•LT: ]f. IOtltl ma a[•1 1•c.0. - - � 1 M. ' - -0 . . Ym MR • TIN.DA • TM.]■.]] •.. 4•�� 5 ;a: O • M. sl au 1310.W. 21. flaalt uar.a.•. _ ... .-... 1 .Y f fa-. I3. f1O11.LIa2,a.I. I _ . .., . �• r6344CiLd. i ^' 't Y • 23. 36 QM CT. M. n177[C nau WW2 - '.as :t i.rT I ,..._ �a II 7 c. - - ('1 y �fJ�r rragPo ! ._i�'i S' *OTC [IS Sua/.•TO•..Aw.[T l.aa woo[O- y • [LE CTa ..C., w300125 NEC.w03 '•a - 81011900 ••S°a O3000 ' 6'C r. 1• I:I •.. ��npI/��npI///)J p Y� • ; 2 I, !}Oust O.rrtw - - - S.C.(too[co•a now) SMALL SHOPS BUILDING •• 'V/V/ I//\JV( ' : 5• o p 't •L '•}', 6N GLr[-Yn r_fQ 1-O ♦ •7.-F••a.C.10030 LOOTIOII _._ 2.40 2102 f • ••OfM ..... .. ..L _ _. - 5��1• '�•OOG"L Lz236 A.C.(FA IN t[YdTIOw) •(Ir'-'f -!l l `'�47 , .-- + . .e tones wn wD .. �; )7 •;' r'O - .�� _ - . � , n 1/ 1a 3 S.W. 1OTH SL _+ , z a M1 M1 ° .^__ ^�/ •-. O[ o. L._11. ED a c . M1 _ rnea J. 1 D I� [�.e .o[Ep Lo. w` a/m,• .�n •.e +1 r.I.O.a • S M1 r. • �•�" - ..:, .___ __.....A.,._• - 330,00 •f ti e 0 / •I C l�e_�'--• M1 rl _ ? - M1 1>9-Y•1 '4 1a 1 ^ •�.. .T y .' •Y -c +ie • _ 1 1+ L - ti _ M1_ _ -_e•-__-a'-._____z• P +e �. et ' •7 L _ .°, �. . A . s^ , ti- sty • ��^__-ti' l - I.. '} 4 _ - 10? •OI flor[ F\ - TCI aTID.LJ --.. •Lb + 'S r [. W @, e'k� '^N77.2T14'E �ln/ - VO•WIDErT•r13r•••• •. - - 141 'T •7 Q a I I p [ 1y 84-29 1 r -. ' TR tsE D0 .. ]O'r1D[r•2[E IOC.20_231,._9 . 5 • • ' Sq[•• {t ' ir/ /I 10'r,D[ 3 LIeE..SEr[,.T 2 »C•SE Y[MT IOR tw a.• - S]EYE [wT 10.Mw[tl l 1 •B ) ]] I W, '�� J4 1M1/< _, E.3[rEM ./ THE 1.OR1,1 LtwC RE'LTLRl GS[r[MT • / IOC.e0.a10219�a - - LORL[3•LC.Mp.l]09It Of l9 I fM[[[ROC.q■309t1Or• 1 WAN.,12•40.26 '1.1>' • M1O J 2 :P:��I:M�-� Rzc hO 6lao•AOn • P•EC irr e0. C309ImTT I IDR 1•1 7 .:.8/. • .Ii • re1N.r rc� 1 tip - I • .l• �� y n' + ? w • • `n -• `; w Y '�• wQ � � isEc wo Es • ,..16 I /P� • ti '1! $ -e' ti� +w� i 4.....-I' + + -+ •C -•l- I' +' ✓ - • •' • s - 5 Q - EL:le.)�/ W // - ^ O Tw[eOR1N'�CIe(o1• 'M1 M1 + 1 -+f• -t• M1• 4 g.M1• 75 Q .'p n M1 I� !0•SrID[ ISSIOw ^ C V 1!•[Y.4.0•r 20'Or 13o'cr cam50 )L,eE E.SErlwT IO rID[ • 1 Or IDT].I041eOR[t3•[O•[SS .[.r31T,[T 12102 T COTIONE♦o 74 1 Ls 10 •M[ S7M714'W ` i • . Q: ` a((�� ^• . 109E•NEa)•UNDEIGWUID ^ D•.1w.p[ .w M1•' {S R[C w0.•J09]109•xo I^ ) QJ/; ,^ I` ti �• OW4G40UND)•ELw019.41�� mw0. n1D0l.•• [ai[M[wT _ ___- +' _---_1O•q JNeT.Ctl'f6 L•H✓S.wr�. I , �SO11903.•^ _ • - - 11) /((� '6 L ••a060ao0fs //z./7 /�/(/ S = n� / 0-3T0• f[R91w• LOTS 2 f] •d , e • 1 '� ,;�i• .2/ .{ __y_-__--a rxa-- _...J•_----_- --e-- --$ +•. M1f . n ' wave.e! 1�'S w�.,.w -etoee.oe •,-•,, u -_ -__ t - 3p - • .. -- __ - _. ' '��' • /-1 v - '--- - 1 T ii?' �[ Sl•--.-s- ... --F _ 11 ' _ �_ • .- • J / r0 a •eE �_ e�,�23 Lorwl•[V • . I b�^J .( •e..No3 I _- _ ' ' ' /7 / !eT sEE rEi) o• xo-1.T tra raw 26 577.28'02'W �jI727 / .l i/ ( IaE[mom ---- -� 11194-30 �' o•_u[[Iorol _II. I ^ • G:1]OS 7,g q9 � L_O `tf To i l�l LI •,EL.-x36] j�]p' ND' �•1 •. 1 `4 417.e9 4' •• q• I.1 C7 • xe . e • ��tir.I1'f Ete//1>o 1.0 we: 0 Ye ° a - tiny_:-Tc� �� f - -1='�-----'' - --'.� -•- '. --;�,•+e� c!-'>=- •i -----'' ' _ 7v%i- - �i•',, 0- `Ac e �22 T - _ n . �wc -dd .s_..:- +--z - ..•4- - _. - - -- --. - �)3 u .-Iw T - _�j 4. 1.1.z '-. __ t�-o n- m .� 16-t M1y.='a _ 15 _ eo°__ ate. 1.r- Owl • _ w- M1 S• e° 2. d 20 •^ d ? 8 e-_'.�-e te•� �4 '�i test�� r' {.. .�M1r` -R n • 2•-�- a `e•m»ccrvr.•rowi � M1e� • -. �,r r1o[sto.[us[rEwr -__ •^ b d- -^,• •s _ - _ _ - )_y/ .. _ •i !% .•-.-.�, -ten �p n a_-__ c --- -• C-- _ _ --- __ _--- - -- _. -- j/1/0� _ .� he=L 70> _ • b ^�-, .N _r ' o M1-- a-- '•' ...7 ]3 17 -- 't'� • 's'io'�M1.f,��M1 - '4 . °•• - jJ f / p. . _lJ- •i• //, j c- -_ /e•C C.•13•C.G•T rnC.t __ - - -• .,., _ - �I� a ^ 2 • ' TO e•CC 1S•CG••SS'C.r I _ - - _. _ , DC r-j / / / S.W GRADY WAY �� ! - � .. 3" %ii ° Q 3 Zvi i� } r or a g1!' LU ° / L[/ /10. Dr cc t0xj - a. , •1 . • • . Ew 1x rw f t.f w0. t• , , . .La c-i LANPHERE ENTERPRISES SITE PLAN CRITERIA AUGUST 1988 The proposal complies will all of the general and specific criteria enumerated in the Site Plan Ordinance. The following analysis addresses each of those criteria: * COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates the area for commercial uses . Since this use fills in a vacant lot in a commercial area, the proposal is in conformance with the Goals , Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. "Vacant land surrounded by developed land should be given priority for development . " Filling this empty lot with a building which faces toward S .W. Grady Way will visually open the entire area and help to entice customers into this commercial section of the city. ECONOMIC GOAL: "To promote a sound, diversified economic base. " Making use of an empty lot will contribute to the tax base, generating between $200, 000 and $300 , 000 for the City annually. POLICY II (A) (2) : "Activities should not overextend public facilities or services. " All urban utilities and services are already available. Lanphere Enterprises/Renton Honda Site Plan Criteria August 1, 1988 Page 2 POLICY II (A) (3) : "Activities with a favorable ratio of cost of public services to potential revenue should be encouraged. " Automobile dealerships have proven themselves to be a very cost effective type of commercial activity in the city as it relates to generation of public revenue. The revenue generated by an automobile dealership is higher than a regional shopping center with much lower costs for emergency services and traffic control . A very large portion of Renton ' s sales tax revenues is collected from the sale of automobiles . URBAN DESIGN GOAL: "To promote aesthetic and functional harmony and to provide a proper balance of residential, commercial and industrial areas. " LAND DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE: "Growth and development should occur in timely and logical progression of the existing urban area to maximize the use of existing services. " POLICY III (A) (3) : "Vacant land surrounded by developed land should be given priority for development. " The proposed project allows the infill of vacant ground that has been non productive for many years. Public services and utilities are available and development will actually result in a net increase of revenues to the City above expenses . * CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATION: The site is zoned B-1, which allows automobile sales as a permitted use. The project will be in conformance with all existing zoning, building code, sign code, and other City ordinances . Lanphere Enterprises/Renton Honda Site Plan Criteria August 1 , 1988 Page 3 * MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES The project ' s site design focuses away from the adjacent shopping center use to the north to eliminate congestion, but at the same time provides improved access to both the shopping center and the commercial uses to the south by creating easier access through a controlled intersection at Maple and Grady Way. In addition, the landscaping will screen the ugly back of the shopping center that is presently visible to Grady Way. Thus the proposal will not create any undesirable impacts that could impair the use or function of surrounding uses or structures . Both the two-story (35 foot high) scale of the building along with the bulk of the building is less than the existing adjacent shopping center. The proposal is actually less intense in both scale and visual impact than other existing new car dealerships in the immediate area. The visual softening of the intensity of the project has been created by the use of landscaping that creates a immediate street-scape along both S .W. Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. The existing pedestrian walkways along Grady will become more aesthetically pleasing with the placement of 10 feet of grass and large street trees. The landscaping will not only benefit the public by first cleaning up the area, but creating a new image of Renton as one enters the primary commercial area from the south. The building itself was located to create specific functional areas that are unique to an automotive dealership. In comparison with other structures allowed in a B-1 zone the proposal represents less than a 1/3 of the total bulk and intensity of the potential development of the site into other commercial and office uses . Low scale lighting fixtures approximately 20 feet in height have been planned for the sales area to provide light for customers in the evening hours , but not intrude into the public areas along the streets . Lanphere Enterprises/Renton Honda Site Plan Criteria August 1 , 1988 Page 4 * MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF A PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE The site is a flat parcel of property that is narrow and has a long frontage along S.W. Grady Way. The building location placement is not only limited by the shape of the lot, but by the design limitation resulting from utility easements. The over head power lines prohibited building construction on the southern 50 feet of the 170 foot deep lot, while a 10 foot wide sewer easement encumbers the northern portion of the site. The specific nature of an automobile dealership lends itself to a site that is seriously restricted because of shape, orientation, and easements. The openness of the development proposal is ideal for the site. The site has been extensively used for utilities in the past. A railroad used to occupy the north portion of the site so for nearly a century the site has been an ugly scar that is gradually being replaced by active prosperous commercial activities. Not only was the natural vegetation of the site destroyed long ago, but the soils were overlain with fill for the railroad bed. The plans call for minor filling and regrading to bring the site up to street level . The new landscaping will be placed in the ideal location with exposure to the southern sunlight. The building scale and placement will not create any shading that is adverse to public areas on or off site. The minor shading that will occur off-site will be limited to established parking areas . On-site, no landscaping will be shaded by the two-story building. * CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES Development of this vacant lot, constructing an attractive building, installing a landscaped entrance to the city, establishing another active business in this commercial area will not only conserve, but will increase area-wide property values . Lanphere Enterprises/Renton Honda Site Plan Criteria August 1 , 1988 Page 6 Combining the three lots provides safer access to all the properties by: (1) limiting ingress and egress movements to fewer points along the public streets, • (2) improving controlled, signalized access to other properties south and north of the subject site from Maple Avenue S .W. , (3) creating access for a superblock along an extremely busy arterial street, and (4) creating access points from side streets or frontage streets (Maple) rather than directly onto arterial streets such as S.W. Grady Way. The internal circulation system has been created to assure the functional relationship of the sales area, service area, and parking area. Since users of the site will drive in their automobiles (which they will be trading in or selling) pedestrian linkages were of minor concern. Safe on-site vehicular circulation was critical and the building was redesigned and relocated several times to assure that the most efficient functioning of the facility occurred. This included the separation of the service, sales, parking, and loading areas of the site. * SIGNAGE Combining of the three lots into one development parcel reduced the legal number of signs under the sign code. Honda uses a standard designed sign that is identical for all of its facilities . Two lighted pole signs are proposed along with three wall mounted signs and an entry way sign. In addition, Lanphere Enterprises is proposing to install a "Gateway" sign to the City of Renton. The .3 foot high monument sign would state simply "WELCOME TO RENTON" . It would be focused upon the intersection of S.W. Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. A backdrop of 3 ornamental trees would soften the sign. Lanphere Enterprises/Renton Honda Site Plan Criteria August 1 , 1988 Page 5 * MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS The building will be designed and constructed to provide for filtered venting of odors and harmful or unhealthy gasses . Landscaping will also mitigate noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions . * AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE The site is at the intersection of S. W. Grady Way with Rainier Ave. S . (Highway 167) and has immediate access to I-405. All City public services and facilities are readily available as well as private services and utilities such as electricity, gas , and telephone. Five Metro bus routes to Seattle, south King County, Bellevue, and Burien as well as to other districts of Renton stop at bus stops adjacent to the site. Also, there are 13 routes with stops in the park and ride lot just east of the site. However, while certain employees could use transit, patrons probably would not. * PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT An attractive new building and an active new business at this important intersection will help to stimulate neighborhood revitalization and discourage deterioration and blight. * CIRCULATION AND ACCESS The issues surrounding both on and off-site traffic circulation and access were considered as critical limiting design factors of the project. The proposal combines three legal lots that could have been developed independently with separate accesses and circulation. spr -OCo4 -SS City of Renton ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1 . Name of proposed project, if applicable: RENTON HONDA 2. Name of applicant: LANPHERE ENTERPRISES 3 . Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Bob Stalp LANPHERE ENTERPRISES 12520 S. W. Canyon Road Beaverton, OR 97005 (503) 643-5577 Owner: Eugene Horbach E & H PROPERTIES 827 108th N. E. Bellevue, Wa 98004 (206) 454-5959 Contact person: Roger Blaylock THE BLAYLOCK CO. 10717 N. E. 4th, Suite 9 Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455-1550 4. Date checklist prepared: August 1988 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Washington page 1 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 6 . Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable) : Occupancy is planned for the winter of 1988. 7 . Do you have any plans for future additions , expansions , or further activity relative to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain. No 8 . List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal . None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes , explain. Yes. S.W. Grady Way reconstruction by the City of Renton Department of Public Works. 10 . List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building, Electrical, Mechanical and Sign Permits 11 . Give brief , complete description of your proposal , including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The request is for site plan approval to construct a 34, 503 square foot building on a 4.09 acre parcel of property. The two story building will house a sales office and showroom, as well as service bays. Also included are landscaped outside display areas and customer parking. Business signage will include two pole signs: one on Rainier Avenue S. and one on S. W. Grady Way. In addition, there will be wall-mounted and entrance signs. It is proposed to include an appropriately designed "Welcome to Renton" sign in a suitably landscaped area on the corner of S. W. Grady Way and Rainier Ave. S. Perimeter landscaping consisting of large street trees along a grassed berm will be provided adjacent to the public streets. page 2 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 12 . Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address , if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site (s) . Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located on the northwest corner of S.W. Grady Way and Rainier Ave S. It includes Lots 1, 2, 3 of Short Plat 100-80 of the City of Renton located in the northwest quadrant, Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one) ; flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes , mountainous , other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope) ? The lot has been filled and is absolutely flat. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck) ? If you know the classification of agricultural soils , specify them and note any prime farmland. Soils are urban fill. There are no agricultural soils. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The site will be filled slightly to bring it up to a foot or two higher than the sidewalk level. Some of the estimated 10, 000 cubic yards of fill will be relocated from on-site. page 3 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings) ? Approximately 88.9% of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None required. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. , dust, automobile, odors , industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, emissions would include dust and exhaust generated by site work. Some emissions to the air could be expected to result from automobile traffic generated by the dealership. b. Are there any offsite sources of emission? I-405, Rainier Ave S and S. W. Grady Way are all sources of automobile emissions. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: During construction, watering as necessary will be used to control the dust. The fact that a new car automobile dealership is selling cars that comply with the emissions control standards is mitigation in itself. The removal and/or rehabilitation of older cars that are in non-compliance is a critical service necessary to meet the air pollution goals of the nation. page 4 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 3 . WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams , saltwater, lakes , ponds, wetlands) ? If yes , describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 ' ) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans . No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. The site is served by City water and sewers. page 5 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources , if any (for example) : Domestic sewage; industrial , containing the following chemicals . . . ; agricultural; etc. ) . Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable) , or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. The site is served by City water and sewers. c. Water Runoff (including storm water) : 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities , if known) . Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water will be collected on site and drained off in accordance with City of Renton ordinances. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. Waste oils will be collected and recycled and will not enter ground or surface waters. It will be constantly monitored to both DOE and EPA standards. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts , if any: Waste oil will be stored in double wall tanks and disposed of off-site. All systems will be designed to meet or exceed EPA, DOE, and City of Renton standards. 4 . PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, aspen, elm, walnut, pear, apple o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other XX shrubs : blackberries , holly, Scotch Broom XX grass o crop or grain o wet soil plants : cattail , buttercup, bullrush, skunkcabbage o water plants : water lily, eel grass , milfoil, other The site is essentially void of significant vegetation. After the initial filling of the site over 8 years ago, the site was neither hydroseeded nor replanted with any type of vegetation. page 6 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grasses and weeds will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants , or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Extensive landscaping will be used along the streets. The most important use of landscaping will be on the corner of Rainier Avenue S. and S. W. Grady Way. Since this is a significant entry to the City of Renton, it is proposed to install a decorative "gateway" which incorporates a sign that says "Welcome to Renton" . The area around the sign will be appropriately landscaped with plants which will supply seasonal color. An evergreen screen will be planted along the north property to buffer the site from backs of the buildings in the adjacent shopping center. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds : hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds , finches , blue jays , other Mammals : deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Yes. Since Renton is located at the south end of Lake Washington, the general area falls within the north-south migration route which parallels Lake Washington. page 7 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The increased landscaping could be expected to attract birds . 6 . ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas , oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be used to light the site and to light and heat the building. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of the proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. Except compliance with the state energy code as it relates to building construction. 7 . ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards , including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill , or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Hazardous wastes including waste oils, gasoline, and solvents will be handled by the employees. All facilities will be designed to code requirements and employees will undertake specialized instruction to deal with hazardous chemicals. The building will be equipped with sprinklers to reduce the fire hazard per City code. In addition, the personnel will be trained in safety measures and emergency equipment will be located throughout the facility. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None is anticipated. City emergency services are available from the main fire station (Station 11) . page 8 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Appropriate precautions are taken by proper training of personnel and availability of emergency equipment in service areas. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other) ? High noise levels exist as a result of heavy traffic volumes on S.W. Grady Way, on Rainier Ave S. and I-405. Major construction noise from traffic improvements to both S.W. Grady Way and I-405 are anticipated over the next three years. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other) ? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. During construction, normal noises from heavy equipment would emanate from the site. On a long-term basis, since this use is so similar to other uses in the area, and since the site is surrounded by traffic, the contribution from this site would be negligible. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts , if any: Construction would occur in accordance with City of Renton standards. In the long term, landscaping will help to mitigate noise. 8 . LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The subject site is vacant, undeveloped land. It was originally used as railroad right-of-way. To the north of the site is a diversified shopping center. Across Rainier Avenue S. to the east is the Sound Ford Automobile agency. South of the site across S. W. Grady Way is a mixed single and multiple-family residential area in transition to offices and manufacturing park. The lot immediately to the west is vacant, but beyond it is a manufacturing park. page 9 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. A major high voltage overhead transmission line runs along the southern portion of the site adjacent to S. W. Grady Way. Two towers are located on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? B-1, Business Use' f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? No one would reside on the site. Employment is anticipated to be 60 people. j . Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts , if any: N/A • page 10 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 1 . Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans , if any: The proposed use is in conformance with both the Comprehensive Plan and the present B-1 zoning. This automobile dealership will have a symbiotic relationship with others in the area. 9 . HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units , if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts , if any: N/A 10 . AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure (s) , not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material (s) proposed. The maximum building height will be 35 feet. The building will be constructed of masonry, concrete, aluminum, steel, and glass with a stone front. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The applicant is proposing to create a new "gateway" to greet people entering the commercial core area of the City of Renton. The concept is to create a controlled image of the City of Renton and promote a positive, friendly attitude to both citizen and visitors. page 11 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur. The proposal will produce the light and glare typically associated with automobile dealerships. The sales lot antl. the building will be lighted. There will be light from headlights entering and exiting the site. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? There is existing light and glare from surrounding traffic on city streets and from the freeway. Also, there is light and glare from automobiles entering and leaving the parking lot at the shopping center to the north and the automobile sales lot across Rainier Avenue S. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts , if any: Landscaping will help mitigate light and glare impacts . 12 . RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The subject site is located in an area of intensive retail commercial uses. It is also subject to extremely high traffic levels on S. W. Grady Way. No formal recreation facilities are available in the immediate area and none have been planned by the City. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No page 12 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreational opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13 . HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14 . TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The direct access to S. W. Grady Way will be limited to right turns. Primary access will be off of the proposed extension of ' Maple Avenue S. W. which leads to Rainier Avenue and to I-405. The intersection of S. W. Grady Way and Maple Avenue S. W. will be signalized. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? At least 5 bus routes travel immediately adjacent to the site. There are bus stops both on Rainier Avenue S. and on S. W. Grady Way. • A large Park-and-Ride lot is located 1 block east. There are thirteen routes that have stops in this lot. Destinations include Seattle, Burien, Sea-Tac, Kent, Auburn, Enumclaw, Maple Valley, Lake Kathleen, Issaquah, Bellevue, University District, and Redmond. page 13 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The project will not eliminate any parking spaces. A total of 93 spaces will be provided for employees and clients. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets , or improvements to existing roads or streets , not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) . Yes. -- See 14 (a) above. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail , or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f . How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Based upon the a special study of new car dealerships in the Puget Sound area by TRANSPO, 27 .1 trips per 1, 000 square feet of building area (948 trips) are anticipated. Peak volumes could be expected to occur on Saturdays and Sundays. Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts , if any: Installation of the traffic signal at S. W. Grady Way and Maple Ave. S. W. will help to control impacts. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other) ? While there might be a minor increase in the need for emergency services, there will be no need for increased health care or schools page 14 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services , if any. None. However, it should be noted that sales tax revenue generated from the sale of 200 new cars per month will be paid to the City. 16 . UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity is provided by Puget Power; telephone, by Pacific Northwest Bell. Other utilities are provided by the City. C. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. • Proponent: . - (Act.,,, verge Name Printed: -OG 7. J L. YC-.0c. page 15 T1-e • Transportation Planning & Traffic Engineering Consultants TRANS! grow July 18, 1988 Mr. Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Company 10717 NE 4th St. , Suite 9 Bellevue, WA 98004 Subject: Trip Generation Rates for Auto Dealerships Dear Roger: Per your request, the TRANSPO Group has prepared the attached trip generation information for your use in estimating the total volume of "driveway" vehicle trips at a car dealership. This information is based on TRANSPO's own experience and previous studies conducted for proposed dealerships in the Puget Sound area. Trip generation rates are simply a ratio of the anticipated number of vehicles that will. be accessing a particular development and a selected independent variable related to the development. These variables are commonly "1,000 gross square feet of building area," "acres," or "number of employees," but can be any useful quantitative factor that relates to the specific land use of the development. For commercial developments, the variable is typically "1,000 gross square feet of building area," which therefore relates the number of vehicle trips to the square footage of the building. The standard reference of trip generation rates utilized by transportation professionals is Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 4th Edition, 1987. This publication lists the average rates for a multitude of specific land uses, based on empirical studies of these land uses. Under Land Use Code 841 of this manual are found the rates for "New Car Sales;" these vaules are listed in the first column of the attached Table 1. Unfortunately, these rates are based on very limited data (three studies in the San Diego and Illinois areas) with varying size developments (with an average size building area of 28,700 square feet). The TRANSPO Group, in an attempt to verify or calibrate these rates for previous transportation analyses of new car dealerships in the Bellevue and Redmond areas, conducted trip generation studies at three local dealerships. The data collected from these studies is summarized in Table 2 (attached), with the derived trip generation rates listed in the second column of Table 1. These studies show that the ITE rates for daily vehicle trip generation could realistically be reduced by over 40 percent for local auto dealerships, and over a 15 percent reduction could be applied for PM peak hour trips. The TRANSPO Group, Inc. • 14715 Bel-Red Road, Suite 100, Bellevue, Washington 98007-3940 • (206)641-3881 The • TRANSPO Mr. Roger Blaylock grow July 6, 1988 Page 2 It is TRANSPO's professional opinion that utilizing the rates based on local observations will provide a more reasonable and accurate estimation of vehicle trips than will the ITE rates. Roger, I trust that this information satisfies your request for the trip generation rates. If, however, you have any questions or require additional information, please call . Sincerely, The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 462!,,) Rory Lindley Transportation Engineer RDG/rmd Attachments Tke TRANSPO Mr. Roger Blaylock GrOVp July 6, 1988 Page 3 Table 1 Comparison of Trip Generation Ratesl for Auto Dealerships ITE2 TRANSPO3 Average Weekday 47.5 27.1 PM Peak Hour --Enter 1.97 1.29 --Exit 2.61 2.53 --Total 4.58 3.82 1. Rates listed are in terms of "number of vehicle trips ends per 1,000 sq. ft. of building area." 2. Listed in Trip Generation, 4th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1987. 3. Developed from various observations and studies prepared by the TRANSPO Group, Inc. • The TRANS[O • grow Table 2 AUTO DEALERSHIP TRIP GENERATION DATA MATRIX DEALER #1 : DEALER #2 : DEALER # 3 : : AVERAGE : MAKE ; Import : Domestic : Import : : N. A. : , BLDG. SIZE ; 18,000 sf. : 29,000 sf. : 20,500 sf. : : 22,500 sf . : PM PEAK TRIPS ; 65 : 110 : 70 : : 86 : iIN/OUT) : (25/40) : N.A. : (20/50) : ; (29/57) : DAILY TRIPS ; 490 : 1020 : 320 : ; 610 : TOTAL LOT SIZE : N.A. : N.A. : 3.88 acres : : N.A. : NO. OF SERVICE BAYS : 16 : 25 : 12 : : 18 : NO. OF EMPLOYEES N.A. : 45 1 25 : : • 35 : EST. % OF DAILY TRIPS: : N.A. : : : : -- Service : : 51% : 427. : ; 49% -- Sales : 247. : 28% : : 25% -- Parts : : 57. 1 7% : : 5% : • -- Employees : : 20% : 23X : : 21% : EST. X OF PM PK TRIPS: : : N.A. : ; ; : -- Service : 60% : : 47% : : 54% -- Sales : 17% : : 24% : : 207. : -- Parts : 9% : : • 8% : : 9% -- Employees ; 14% : : 21% : : 17% : Source: The TRANSPO Group, Inc. a ® CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 II . 111 - --411'-- ' • b * .. ._ est i .....0• • Or( --7.i I---* - .:-- _... - r . . • '4 st • 19— c6`3. ..... •.t... 4 7, ,fts... .., :,•,,,-.- -.,.. whis.. . • "..• • ri ,i .i ,..... . ., .---...?, , ' • g ...:"„,''''... . - . . _ . ' : '' " ilf.;• "ft 4 .4. , 1040 ' • _DA — 0(04 - Sss 4 1 - 1 (1- scs r • • • • 1Ig J -- --........ • an0 vMwWW�� I'1I .T_ -. ¢opooe...�.....„ �T. III 11 .NNI^.1 ee.N ATH AO IW� J I ! LI L \ tr 1 r , b'J.iFleo(T0) 1. 1.1 ;i 2 t 1 r1 o 0 0 0 0 ^ ,./ • i I I I Renton Honda I :- ,fir•• I. liyi / °`\� i 1 / / a< l �;, 1 1 __. 1 , rl I uotfreD POLE'.!!ON ,• ,. . i II •. • • • L.I r,. .�.'. ;..-tt! •� I I • 0 0 0 'W.cOMG'6KaN ! ' 'I : '.. • r IN' VINCA BENEATH(Tr?) • ./ j0 '"' m f . LIOHTGO ROLL 516,N LYcffr STANDARD ENTR *laws) [IYa•I Wl.TAge.FbLG ,' /'' ,y, G ilk Crrn) .. . . l' 'il —. 2 hi 4 0 \O/OCVNLK 67TM/6 ACE ENT W4LL3 GeA hAL Cc-.0 'WrLLOMG'SYcN Q hi > / DV?) (TO eG wovr:Brc'rr of 1�rTON) - SW GRADY.. WAY - - - I / . - 'WNW / , ... itff --.' / [ . 'i 0 15 30 60 90 120 i 1 m .0 171mIllmommi ' Ai irl • PLANTING SCHEDULE: PLANTING DETAILS. �YMPj01. EYT7AN/CA(. E/COMMON NAM 51T.e_/RPMARKS _.. . . �I,..Inl O A2-WEETN'Rao 6.N.+Cr'/ 0'CA 15=16'HT., •MATCHED,�,JI',trtMET21CAL. •/� RED�J`/EGT MAPLECAY7PIEy,WGLI.pZiJJG4G.O,8!5.LM•1BtP G^2PnIA .LRO E 'Fi9-GRNEEA'/ 2'GV.,,IOC 12.'Hr,SYM,YIGTR/GRL,I-,, 1 • �' "�(¢ ,y p5AN6 RI CCLU<MlA2 E1.7eA�EMI f-CYtNEGIM PRANCHFA FULL. B!E,. -� 'Olh•r1VLK RL24ET O , PH NVT.4ERY_ I 0 CI.FRe'J500-YP.'.Ct• LEYLAVOii/ MIN.G'H7,Rl/.s,El!`J-IY 70 5'L�G. 1 VoSB -. LEYLAND CYPRESS Wet ROM EWA0E, 5!6. 12 0A-vnee ': • RA wee r,.�ABp•L 11 1-oz o.P.S»acEa. y evF�r,P•_---_-_. C$GV.LONIA LA.N6L0Ye v*,'AfFtB Q;O.AONI'/ ffi'HT.,p(KL I WeLL dQMrJiGD,C PPALVA.Co a e Y 71NISM BpWO APPLE.EI-Of-QN 66(IlLav/A RXJA.IaP. 6!0. & OF�TFIALL Fr Tor 15 000 °.ems euerWctx7ii/ ', ti'-rARr.wn.Cti P MI5 w um AssFecb 11 - Croce • u r .JrISH 6kl4DE- .. G • ILEX CRENATA V0REEN I�X.M10'/ r1,3YMM T,t/C.AL It1zM,2f¢..r•X I. ryFUK IT S1o6G* S .r1[+Ni1NE 6KI¢7U.. DWP..Y.FiVJee&NOWT (S fiRLW FLY.lI•(LG,0f 8. /.rN.•1MCE e41110 LP PIT - Iy,N-TYICC .1 I 11 I ODeciduous Tree Planting . °Shrub Plating I • VN.r-A MIN'7 / 4'ft7M,I0.AC.7RANON•••a.XY' ChN6r.. r�•ROW I. N.T.S. 4• N•TS. - k FS IW/NKLE K'/N?•Lc(v qe ecroc.. FLIL,St 1YR.AIN/8, ANN.es)regonWGee. .2Y2 HGW rr<AkB. 0 -- 1,.,:: ':i(:::I LAWN/ SCF.D L.1Nh1,RFPPR 70 .1.PEGFICATfQVQ. G .N ro R611.4.1., -.,.P/ AL Cf1LLP 4•RJlr,2 aG.7RLVJ.5F11(/N6. W,R/El7G'�A6 • .3LtLPe A'M1tE WIL._ I.. ��77 Mp7@7VC0. STPANOCNI.RIESM- lin }q NT T77P Or 51TKE I'III O W APO pxEVAal.ws Z C r � _ = a m rr—nJ )--y • TO Z rNl IIVpi d 0 w q A .III. < �` 1 - Op C RANTING r rr€Yp0LL II I, () [[g4 c 00 inns Z sOEvergreen Tree Planting II 0 J. N.T-5. Z . —_.D c- 3anDeSnGp• 'Iqi' i ///N!/{ ®=dam 11 �. L-1 BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE J C� A � 8037,. 061,1 • GjL�/+ CURTIS u'EATTIE & ASSOCIATES Architects 3131 Elliott Ave. Suite 270 Seattle, WA 98121 (206) 282-8512 July 6, 1992 Mr. Don Erickson Zoning Administrator City of Renton Dept. of Planning/Building/Public Works Renton, WA 98055 Reference: Renton Honda/Bear Sculpture • Dear Don: I appreciate your taking the time to meet with me last Wednesday. As I explained, the purpose of the meeting was to understand the permitting procedures relative to the Bear Sculpture for Renton Honda. We reviewed the circumstances generally as follows: • May 22, 1990 - A Building Permit application was filed for "Installation of Folk Art Sculpture" (#7832). • June 10, 1990 - Plan Review Routing slip from the Planning Division stated an interpretation of the Bear Sculpture as a sign and denied it because of existing signs. • July 2, 1990 - Our office requested a formal interpretation of the Plan Review comments. • July 16, 1990 - Your letter indicating that the issue is "mute" since the sculpture had already been erected. • August 15, 1990 - Our letter again requesting a formal determination on the original proposal. • September 11, 1990 - Your letter formally issuing an interpretation and appeal procedure. • September 25, 1990 - Appeal period lapses for lack of formal appeal. However, discussions continued regarding other options. • November 23, 1990 - A revised plan location for the bear sculpture was submitted for review. • December 17, 1990 - Your letter denying the revised plan. • December 31, 1990 - Our letter of appeal of the December 17, 1990 denial of the plan revision. • January 10, 1991 - Hearing Examiners confirmation of appeal hearing. • February 26, 1991 - At the appeal hearing the determination was made that this related to the original application and that the appeal period had elapsed, therefore no public hearing was allowed. Don, the point that I am trying to emphasize and confirm is that the ultimate denial was on the original application. Based on my discussion with you,Jim Hanson, and Ron Nelson we could have, and still can, file the revised location as a brand new Building Permit application. If this were then to be denied on the same.basis as before we would have the legal right to make a timely appeal to the Hearing Examiner in order to have a public hearing on this issue. If my understanding is correct, please sign and return a copy of this letter. Sincerely yours,_ CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS Curtis L. Beattie CLB/mk /f_f Concurrence by Don Erickson Date r. COMMU""TY DEVELOPMENT DEPA-MENT BUILDING DIVISION BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PHONE: 235-2540 ADDRESS OF PROPERTY 2-6. 7 3 J c z1YV 1' (IF NEW CONSTRUCTION, THIS DEP T WILL ASSIGN ADDRESS) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION TO BE PERFORMED /NS . I77(>-.) (7 •- /�_�,(� VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION:''! 6- BOEING JOB 4# (if applicable) KING COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER FOR PROPERTY e 041:/7 qU 01 (MAY BE FOUND ON PROPERTY TAX STATEMENT OF TITLE PAPER$) LEGAL DESCRIPTION TO BE SUBMITTED ON TWO (2) SEPARATE .8-1/2 X 11 SHEETS OF • OWNER OF PROPERTY C / f ` '-'f'E/Z" .-' PHONE•7T1.-'J S— / STREET ADDRESS J7.?J //,T"/ i4-t" —i & CITY/STATE C-f i' ' ZIP TENANT (if applicable) ,-61viDuN1 7/-I01ti'J 1 /elf%2'4 17 0'5/14f-5' CONTACT PERSON ?7t1/--- 6 T7 -ry PHONE . -C)' - 's / 2- STREET ADDRESS 3/3/ /( /ti/c CITY/STATE (DT/r2- ZIP76/Z/ SJ 171 'Z:v CONTRACTOR /41T k ivo(ti'J AT' /S r/ir'6- PHONE STREET ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIP CONTRACTOR'S STATE LICENSE # CITY BUSINESS LICENSE # I certify that the information on this application furnished by me is true and correct and that the applicable requirements of the CITY OF RENTON will be met. I understand that this application is valid for six months from the application date. If a permit is not issued during this time period, the application will become void. This application does not constitute a permit to work. Work is not to commence until building permit is posted on premises where work is to be performed. Work in public rights-of-way and/or utility easements are not authorized under this application. PERMIT FEE $ 07) PLAN CHECK '$ 9a-7 ' BUILDING CODE FEE $ /f c °°"PERMIT RECEIPT # DATE s/2-0/10 PC RECEIPT # 6 2%5‘, DATE S�a�/ 0 DRAINAGE PLAN CHECK $ DATE: 1 CITY OF RENTON SIGNATURE �!, � ',^ E C E 1 V ED DATE MAY 2 2 1990 forms#1:b1dgappi • COVbld216 01/90 BUILDING DIVISION , . Exhibit 1 �' G � '‘ �I F^o s M r( T 1 - R=S �I ( i - P LYGj , . mAri-r, ?-TH_ilr) ?�;:u AL t � 0;vr` or ` 5T, l / LL lIt��;1J; . l =° - IP k� Li, FA-sEN'iNii 1 G1 '1 . SNG 3EqNS / _� • • ,:f f _ i i •—_—� - - -- - —— -- — - - , II N� - /-cj/i _[A? `(i�_ ;III -_ — - - - — I IIzELAN!_ 151-41/� G =iiLLS - �'-r;l'r rs�'.oll I �L�9 s'.�'I s ' �'' I : I, •< r �1 - �-r O o •I H- YYA�4.oll, - - �, s �� Q ��I- ^`,u �- I t I _I �_.a UFL,:.... s�� iII�T � i�ii FzING 1 �� / 4_, ,[ , ..-3 I A/ 6 & c; 6 6 6 [ - _,•,) ----2‘,.,\ite,Aizq / . t -0 ..$1 ?,, h . . • No,O a 6 I a �� !/I i' 1 `.`Z, _../ o- A • tI tl t1 LI. �i.[I -33 • /f-1 I Q . WP-L. . ::: iiiq I / ' I�'l�� .�7 t o �} —Y Q lil , • Z- C� �� • ,-,./.,,- „ Q STD L t, .Q 1 1- 17 5;�'•-1,L 5 1 M -/ . .. ._.. _ ._ � N� • a c C � G G G -� W � "5Ci'-od � b�r��- _- � - I� G � 1=p eU��C r`( ) ��, -fir�►'li- ' ' ° `� tiT4 LL5 4' `f C7 (�'7�c�1 '1 h�� LLS Q Y>=Loi': 5`I'i(�! I h'�1.1.5 m °ll �I% i -Q — • �� _..... _ — ..1. I �r-o l' 11 �"-II I 1 ' f • 1 1 lA `1- I 11; 5-jpLL�,G `i'rl'*LS 8 LI-�r '� •3 S1T l� J _` - • �� f?�LL,d.�J �TQf�I[=Wf�L1- �ly }.{ 1 Il-C<' j ' 5f..1L/ \ f LIh�iE of 50'. I�1IP l"fENT 1aTIC :- Fob �d, _ 1 j -; ; a FAH � Rbl�l�p-I INKS , I IG,HTgP foL>= . S1�,N z -o.)-vE�l� , cL- R, RI I CUTH ER LI L1 JY EAR-N-�S /&-f2 1`t-d E'l6 � �3 El r Rr-i Co I~.I Ef2 LI e'D T �� LJ -iir) �fi 9� T W/ P�WW-IN� ?= M�T� s�u��-u . I. / ; r 4 kh s 11� . . H20 as - ! --_-- -� « pISPI p.� 1c... 7 (31w ,I / ,��, 21-o'lov �( ,) G�� 5>= r �TY�� Ic -�_=-__ = — — — _•. - --- . — — O '=�� / i�F' mod ' 4- + pl LAY -- — _ _. - - - - - 41ar, .. _ - al_° I� - q ;I '- _ - - -_ _ o___- - —_ — — 3 i. JI=-1-- H3r • h. • P UTYoF Rom{ioH STg�p 1/ R0IJ CI-11 pro] aA /vsnNci 1-I6I (sTp _ lM W GIr'( OMH _ • / -� �- . • T W o-1-->°-Y — 1 r lI -T�-1 i�N 11 - • _Lr"'oP05FP 5141..E > • L 5 a- r a d�: VV a .� - .--- ._ • • _ -i•i -.,r •• • __ i , 6 . • zz-,.a_ • CITY OF RENTON hiLL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT � �. afiYC4 Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Director July 16, 1990 • Marc Gleason Curtis Beattie& -`'"" Associates Architect • 1 % �ggp 3131 Elliott Ave,Suite 270 \ • - Seattle,WA 98121 • SUBJECT: Renton Honda . • • Dear Mr. Gleason: In response to your letters dated July 2, 1990,.the issue of the Bear Sculpture is mute for now since it has already been erected. However, if it is used in advertising or in identifying the premises, we will be forced to treat it as a"sign." As you and the applicant are aware, only one free-standing sign per street frontage is allowed under Renton's Sign Code. As to the question relating to sod lawn, I concur that this is not necessary in light of the eminent street widening project. If you have any questions, let me know. • Si cerely, fA Donald K. Erickson,AICP Chief, Current Planning DKE/kac u t /Wm pumsrin tt'1gis)-1 200 Mill Avenue South -.Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 Pacslmlle r2o5) 235-2513 CURTI � iATT1E & ASSOCIATES Architects 3131 Elliott Ave. Suite 270 Seattle,WA 93121 (206) 282-8512 August 15, 1990 Mr. Don Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Reference:. Renton Honda Dealership/Bear Sculpture T 7832.. Dear Don: • The tenant at the Renton Honda site has temporarily "Propped Up" his bear sculpture with the hope that he can permanently display it along Grady Way as originally proposed. Therefore I am still requesting a determination on the originally proposed location of the: Bear. sculpture. Sincerely yours, CURTIS BEATPIE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS Marc Gleason MG/mk • • • V Itt t°? - -4 CIT OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public P Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator September 11, 1990 RECEIVED SEP 1 it 1990 Marc Gleason CBA Curtis Beattie&Associates 3131 Elliott Avenue, Suite 270 Seattle,WA 98121 SUBJECT: Renton Honda Dealership/Bear Sculpture Dear Mr. Gleason: The Renton Honda dealership is located within the Business District (B-1) zone. In the proposed location, the bear is considered to be a sign and therefore, must be located in accordance with the City of Renton Municipal Code requirements. The B-1 zone requires all structures to be located a minimum of ten feet (10') from the property-line. . Section 4-20-12(C)(2), of the Renton Municipal Code, states that each individual business may have only one sign for each street, frontage of any one of the following types: freestanding, roof, ground or projecting or a combination. Renton Honda already has a sign for each street frontage. If the bear is to be located on the street, as indicated by the attached plan, Renton Honda would need to apply for a variance from the sign code allowing two signs on a single street. However, it is unlikely that staff would be able to support the variance in this case since there is no perceived hardship and allowing the variance would set a precedence. One possible alternative would be to locate the bear directly adjacent to the west side of the building. In this location, the bear would be less noticeable from the street and would be less likely to raise questions or precedence about excess signage. Section 4-20-2 defines a sign as "Any medium including merchandise, its structure and component parts, which is used or intended to be used to attract attention to the subject matter for advertising purposes." If the bear is located so as not to be clearly visible from the street and is not referenced in future advertising, we could support the position that it is not used for "advertising purposes." If you have any questions, please give me a call at 235-2550. If you wish to appeal this interpretation you can do so by filing an appeal, in accordance with Section 4-8-11(B) of the City's Building Regulations, with the City's Hearing Examiner. The appeal would have to be filed within 14 days of the date of this letter, by 5 p.m. on September 25, 1990. There is a$75.00 filing fee for such an appeal. Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator ; ////' . O/f 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 -r. n i;U�! ,,, _. — Uqr �?Dul.12.Al?:IN,- EXj rN ioh1 3 '' pv& UN----4 j �,NI.p of fF I , wA-LL !=--f�i• L.,-/�-�r�G4� - 101 NCip� J,�!!=g 1Jf..1F. -sEH$f\_1T cUfz131NC, r3EC{INS• _ r =� / ' E � � _, 7 -ter/ __ ��i r_4 -010 I . H- � WPC oil. (?AIN EP 1�I1 f?!Nci 1 � I t / / h r AN KL_F,tiU., IJ ..: SsL... I 5'-LI/4 i (_, %rtr.��0 yi_1.2, r 5�'-0�l ,-1 �iA-u_5 ems'-&.'' s ��'-&-'` • 15 1,�-k-L1.b e 11-<:1'. ,_ %�''" N/ r; - !_ 1. f i CD. 4 1 r _ 1! . / of i _ • �' G G , --;,\ '.f5'O it /1 t1 t1 ni cr. rl_ fa'i I- b ti I /( PT, �j 1` • 0T • : •- 1} _. ;.q•55-63/4- e 0.c," 3,�,aL Li_ SC 211_4I' t H�. .0 - / , ,j L , • /- - !� / `� 12:l.Q,, A b'P•�L.�a -�, 12 h;i^kl-S 25'-q"r • (I • \'` N a- C c G 6 ,, C a' G • j___- G G _ i - • \ . . 4 , Ii 1 176 LLb c `i1'oil S C,'7'-<7 11 ,'Lh i� LLS p �: o'': SGI�C�'11. h p•U�5 �''il G'I% 1 — ' '�, I t -k I( - - - - j ; 4 G C G L �- 2RYA L•5 f3 1NI_ -b` i-2' , 5'pLVjL `1' II ' EI � % . -o'= LAME - w I r.° i c - 0 - H• G1 CZ% a I � ' I i Co j-'-ox3�-fw_L • ` _ ' ELti Is�b 1 ' J �• . 1 L ' � �J sI M -LINE OF �O ,IIPE �� `ENr , 5 r t LIGHi=P TUE. SIBN (15 24-0� , 2HF � -I ��S I9- ff� t-;I&�E i7=-�? �cu� Uz l i IF��r� Po, rGI LI �S t n� CrP) %tw�-� •J .. . • -•-- .. - Gro l � CUr--_2 U� u rf �� Ts �� j _yT + C_P ` llCr- ` Q 2Q_ T cTY�) �� iq 193 -�� T W IEI NE EI - T / E� . . z-� ov .K!t ..) G 171 ' AY •• /,_., .. ._ _ . . -- -. .1 0 `L- .' ,z__._ . _ _ ___s__ _ ,i _ ___ __. ___ __, ___ ___ ___ __ . -- _ __ -4r ._, •,__ _ri- — — —----— ----F-.F.36-7-57.. — — — --2-----) 0 ..---—--- R:-. -- ----s\--- T.-0,.,..- , -hl i ) .. c-t.1 IA IL, l•'4 • la (... 4 26'1 f?..— .— ......-• .—. -- __ 7 _ i / cr \ y L \ / /urn1 _ 914.31' •r \ / ; L 1 < pF1 d-,4t��VSf N(fi -I!;I-,I SIPGu(Lr iT Y lam l• PE,2 0TYOF - t--iTOr4 ST�� mzR► W lr_Y c..,0 i , • /— . . / g < • 3 21 o// T1.�10-11, Y l�• I-E.' I I t`i--I L�J F . d - S . W . Grady - Way : Imo- , r-., ---- , ;� • -=' �:�'`lil -- _ .v:�..�d ram'`.'/•�-._ - 5• ' O '•=tea -o• � •� i • CITY OF RENTON Department.of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator December 17, 1990 DEC 2 J 1320 Mark Gleason, Project Manager CaA Curtis Beattie&Associates,Archs 3131 Elliott Avenue Bldg;Suite 270 Seattle,WA 98121 • RE: Proposed siting for carved wood bear structure at Renton-Honda Dear Mark: • We have reviewed the proposed siting of the carved bear structure and cannot not support it. The revised location at the driveway west of the existing pole sign along S.W. Grady Way is unacceptable from the City's standpoint and just reinforces our opinion that this object is intended to function.as a sign or logo for Renton Honda. If We-and others are to accept the notion that this object is in fact a piece of sculpture - rather than a sign as defined in Section 4-20-2 of the Building Regulations, it needs to be displayed as such. This means that it should preferably not be exhibited in a passive or semi-passive area where pedestrians can stop and admire it and possibly where seating is provided nearby for those wishing to stop and comprehend its aesthetic meaning. After reviewing the site plan, it would appear that the carved bear could be sited in one of the parking islands within or behind the front face of the existing building (see attached site plan), away from S.W. Grady Way. The"revised location"you prefer is within the zone abutting the street right-of-way where most pole signs are displayed. If the bear were located in this area there is no question in our minds that this structure is a "sign" under the City's definition. Incidentally, you need to know that this issue was recently reviewed by the Renton Municipal Arts Commission and they concurred with City staff that given the way this object was being displayed its perceived character was more that of a sign than a piece of art one would stop to contemplate. If the object were sited such that its orientation was less overtly related to the street right-of-way (a minimum setback of 60 feet or more from S.W. Grady and/or Rainier Avenue S. is suggested) I am willing, in this one instance,to administratively determine that its intent would appear to be more that of an"object de art" presumably to be enjoyed primarily by the employees of and visitors to Renton Honda, rather than being a sign or logo for Renton Honda. If you will resubmit plans that show the object so located, I will make such an administrative interpretation for the record. If we cannot reach an agreement soon on acceptable siting of the pole carving the City will have no other alternative but to begin citing Renton Honda for violation of the City's sign code (fines of up to$300.00 per day are provided for on conviction in Section 4-20-1 of the Renton's Sign Code). I'm hopeful that we can quickly resolve this issue in the near future. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at your convenience.I can be reached at 235-2550. ? �7 • • erely, Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator 3/5/7 I 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • • ��—h..CD, �;L!�c1 I II p' -7 B '- °v/ - - =UN Rc1;?o.UJ2.A:. _;N�..ExT Ea(vio Ni 1' & o\� r- • • : }PoM�M-H RM '-T�L/E. FR�,r:-ii v .�l--i iz-'iGad MatL .No?-Tr! I�� o� ��I A.L Li Src� _ _ -I^`--t6; r�•r�5rrcI-1'� p. to N I �. y� iz- i- J asE.t-eit_JTFNP of �T. k,&t L - •C31 ��lIyS � 1\1 — Q• 7 % Q• I —t i -(' /TPTFP1-, 7r • NG- 1 f- /' IPJ � , il:1 J 111..1'''..II: inn - . / • ' r1cpISFiIEZ k wrT�l 0'i s�� eNK � UYij _ s }I 'I 1 . !! � • ' ' - ' � _ , . I/ l,.L / G %rfLLSE SI-t%`r 54IQ! Y" � 1 �SI.� �{ f •L Q -e � ! , I- 2d!o„ • ' V- - i / I -Ij= -t� =ter— 'r ' { I ' 1 I 3 � '��Lei': 21 13‹ Is IN�f� I • • _ I `'J�QT .. m t{Ki 6 I/ E Yl:L 3 S Lb C ' I Q I 171-0 27 1_ • —I /ie -leif/r`i .‘1,r 9 •. • — � G _ � � i � -s'I : _ IitL kW GU fei/v/ F U#�Fp �UPi3CTyP) `o I `1 i,i.D-I.Lb 9 1. °'� I rl 1 I' I I I 1 Q • I`?G(/! �/� Cly E..`f C� Ce'7-n 1�i�LLSFrY�-� : 5`i�Cd I , hiLl-SC!°I•dr= %� ' 7f ' r_ e/biri 1, ( • — — — • G. I I II . v., I I , 2 i b lr.5 ."I } I I r;•p V- r I l 2'1�O' I .. I wpi. �� I I� r ,I_ r 3 J - • r \/i55i7 LcLAI�W� ' L _.._G. 1" . ` / - 1 I} I`i (' f, .v st 60.1.-A•0?� „ TCNF WA-L l- �I 1-1vi I LIN1= OF =o I--IIPE FA• fENT iq'-ou nzo FusE._• o.-.._-•:•::--•-:-:.. • 7.-.„...) ( % rr !IGH F-P roL1: S}G�! Z4.'-c5. �'E/�. 1�-; ci, R. 1ri�N i�'AR r )- I-` - - oR- avr2HFA-0 FbW aNS . cou.�-URp -= - . . / // ; razor-+ cc?L-45g l,l 5,5 1.J rou -r Pn!--!i Cr*') -rov _ '�1-- 93 CUTHi=1� U1l l J 1Y EA --t-`rF�,rs �T • •• -). . / . ;� i PF-P G . WHr I- ST cirr) �HdS!T LT >° 1 I C. 1 1-9 SAT W/ Polj-1 W-I N E F?--t'1)-1 T) / pfzii,4.44( ,) 7,6•,12 ‘-?•6N-L. , PI3 LAY . Am- ----- '- : -1- - -• --7--- -- I S=E .- Y ) i /).- -. , • •. 4 • • ./ •- ! I_; •• ) I O_ , . Li . Gtif2-r e-LIT 41-• C-12,04--b WA-Li< • . . • ( • • pa' U I-(OF fz=_�I Tort STb,�lp / Pri dl�t'r`e_xisnNC. 1-1611416-P- • za ✓ GIl • • �� `or • r • ,0/7 6Q/ • �—& 1e i�� r�d r9� at ef 3/ � ,, c 1.4- -- • Ti,�!a-L-V < . te-/ik ) 4%*:1- ' ."7-/-V 61e -Acti,,, , -S . Grad i111 ay_ - - 6 ‘.\a/Au/) 7.16/6' • ..., 0. . • . z‘-,adpip-,-A, - . tr:----.__AF-- r-- -, u 1_, -Eu12_•,=_ . . ... . . • • . CITY OF P.ENTON • -�� p��M IT 4- s!� F!-rh I`! Fri XAL ' 5•*2--cio r NOV 2 6 1990 1 • Vis=1� I1 , •23 •10 j ='moo -'0 i Parties of Record Bob Stalp Lanphere Enterprises 12520 S. W. Canyon Road Beaverton OR 97005 Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Co. 10717 N. W. 4th Street, Suite 9 Bellevue, WA 98004 Eugene Horbach A 9800 f`�� "j‘ � /V Bellevue WA 98004 . (Interested Party) Mrs. C. A. Staley PO Box 3407 Federal Way, WA 98063 206-927-2323 Mrs. Edith B allestrasse 201 SW 12th Street Renton, WA 98055 yo A . 1arzSo /l G o )�,ra p .? SU— CURT1 : EATTIE & ASSOCIATE : • Architects 3131 Elliott Ave. Suite 270 • Seattle,WA 98121 (206) 282-8512 • December 31, 1990 • Mr. Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton _ 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, WA 98055 • Reference: Appeal/Bear Sculpture/Renton Honda Dealership Permit No. #7832 Dear Mr.JKaufman: Renton Honda would like to appeal the decision made by the Department of Planning regarding the proposed location of a bear sculpture to be erected on the Renton Honda site. (See attached letter and Site Plan.) The Department of Planning has made an assumption that Renton Honda proposes to use this sculpture as a sign or logo. The Department of Planning references the zoning codes definition of signage. In the definition it states that "any medium... . which is intended to be used to attract attention to the subject matter for advertising purposes". I don't believe Renton Honda intends to sell bears nor is the bear a symbol that references an advertising purpose. At no time has Renton Honda used the bear, in any form, as a part of its advertising approach. The dealership has an established logo and advertising approach that does not incorporate anything relating to a bear (see attached letter head, tv promotion information can be provided, to reinforce this point - upon request) . The Department of Planning is making the assumption that if sculpture is located near a street it is in an effort to use it as a sign or logo. There are numerous sites in this area, Fremont's "waiting for interurban", Seafirst 5th Avenue "Vertebrae", and the animal pole sculpture in front of the new Wallingford Center retail area, all of which incoporate street side sculpture. Similar to Renton Honda, these sites include sculpture that serves as an object to be viewed and not as signage. Renton Honda is not proposing to erect their version of the "Michelin Man". FILE coPN Mr. Kaufman December 31, 1990 Page 2 It appears the bear is being inaccurately viewed as signage when in fact it is sculpture and as such should not be governed by signage ordinance. Renton Honda is requesting that the bear sculpture location be allowed as proposed on the site plan submittal as an object for on and off-site viewing, and that the Department of Planning decision be overturned. Sincerely yours, CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS • • Marc Gleason MG/mk Encl. cc: Mr. Dan Hixson Ms. Pam Putnam •.. a r. P. CIT. OF RENTON Hearing Examiner Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman REC:A IED JAN 1 1 1N1 CBA January 10, 1991 • Marc Gleason Curtis Beattie & Associates Architects 3131 Elliott Avenue, Suite 270 • Seattle, WA 98121 Re: Appeal/Bear__Sculpture/Renton Honda Dealership Appeal No: AAD-004-91 Dear Mr. Gleason: We have received and reviewed your appeal of the above matter and a date and time has now been scheduled. An appeal hearing will be legally advertised and set for Tuesday, February 5, 1991 at 9:00 A.M. in the council chambers located on the second floor of the Renton Municipal Building. It is important that all parties adhere to this time and date as time constraints will make it extremely diffucult to provide another date and time for this hearing. If you are unable to attend, may we suggest that you appoint a representative to appear on your behalf. We appreciate your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: Lawrence Warren, City Attorney Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Renton Honda Jay Covington, Mayor's Executive Assistant GC : tA'11/ ffl dN . . 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 `fiU L / iSSi Fil5i4 1991 C8A :..ub, OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: RENTON HONDA File No: AAD-004-91 LOCATION: 200 SW Grady Way SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Appeal of administrative decision regarding placement of bear sculpture/sign at Renton.Jionda dealership. After reviewing the correspondence pertaining to the above matter it is the determination of the __ Hearing Examiner that the appeal was not filed in a timely manner. • The staff determination which gave rise to an appeal was issued on September 11,.1990. An appeal of that determination should have been filed by not later than 5:00 P.M., September 25, 1990. Since a timely appeal was not filed with the Hearing Examiner's Office as required by law, the Hearing Examiner lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal. Based on the foregoing analysis, the matter is hereby dismissed. . • - ORDERED THIS 26th day of February, 1991. FRED J. FMAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of February, 1991 to the parties of record: Marc Gleason • Curtis Beattie & Associates, Architects - - 3131 Elliott Avenue, Suite 270 • Seattle,WA -98121 Don Hixson Renton Honda 200 SW 'Grady Way P.O.Box 4040 - Renton, WA 98055 • TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of February, 1991 to the. following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Administrator Members, Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson, Development Services Manager Gary Gotti, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney . . Jay Covington, Mayor's.Executive Assistant - Transportation Systems Division Valley Daily News Utilities System Division St-Yak t% THE ILLAYII O CK COMPANY R CITY OF RENTON specialists in land-use procedures JUN 2 9 1992 BUILDING DIVISION June 25, 1992 Mr. Donald Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98004 RE: Renton Honda Automobile/ Landscaping Maintenance Dear Mr. Erickson: The issue of improper pruning of the street trees along S.W. Grady Way was brought to the attention of Mr. Dan Hixson. After a review of the site Mr. Hixson realized that the pruning of the trees had not been as well as he had expected from a professional landscaping company. To determine if there was a remedy to this problem, Mr. Hixson requested that P & G Plant Company, Inc. of Seattle complete a horticultural evaluation of the deciduous trees. (Copy attached) They believe the damage caused by the improper pruning is minimal and can be rectified. It appears this process will take a little time to accomplish, but it should not present a problem. They believe that implementing the corrective measure would be faster, better and more cost effective than replacing the trees, especially when considering that the current trees have over two years of growth and a mature root system. Sincerely, Ro er J. Blaylock 107171E Fourth Street,Suite 9 0 Bellevue,Washington 98004 0 (206)455-1550 . 0. 64: , k „., P&G PLANT COMPANY, INC, June 10, 1992 Dan Hinson Renton Honda 200 SW Grady Renton, WA 98056 RR. Horticultural evaluation of the deciduous trees. Dear Darn, ThP challenge that occurs when deciduous trees are topped IS t:t u t: the trees do not form a good crotch ( see diagram below. ) The topping causes the tree to sucker because a deciduous trap wilt always try to achieve its ultimate height . We can remove the bad suckers and leave the ones that WI ) he "strongest . " We do feel that with the proper hort icu i t i e l pruning the trees can take their natural form again and achieve the desired look for the area. AO A STRONG CROTCHT()t'1't t+ 1 tilt E 2:;), In in gm( kt I • Dan, please let me know how you would like to proceed with Any horticultural corrections or replacements . Sincerely, P & Gant Company �� " ' Scott Barron General Manager SHirp 334 BOREN AVENUE NORTH SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98109-5305 (206) 292.9522 FAX (206) 292.0516 Doi\ 5,4-o(01--gs WeismanDesignGroup -3641 wo,10 W; i) :;'• .,.- I\CPS i cfi� 1)10�- Landscape Architecture a *2- Site Planning n n Developmental Planning r � r March 27, 1992 Mr.Don Erickson Planning Director City of Renton - ' Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,Washington 98055 Dear Don: As a follow up to our meeting the other day,I wanted to let you know that I was the landscape architect of record on Renton Honda. As I drove by the site the other day I was interested in seeing the condition of the plant material,particularly the large specimen street trees along the frontage. I was dismayed to discover that they had been severely pruned back by the Parks Department into ball shapes and have lost all sense of form. I am concerned that the Parks Department is pruning trees without any reason which is contrary to the City's desire for large,mature,full-canopied street trees. The trees in question were beautiful well-branched specimens that did not need any pruning whatsoever. I understand that there are other areas in the City where the same thing was done. I would be glad to talk to you to discuss what can be done to convince the Parks Department that this kind of pruning is not necessary. I would appreciate any help that you can give me in convincing them of this. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, Mark Weisman,ASLA WEISMAN DESIGN GROUP, INC., P.S. MW:sd P}, NNINO DIVISION CITY ftr•RENTON APR 0 7 1992 2329 East Madison Seattle,Washington 98112 (206)322-1732 W 18t 0 esignGroup J(„F^ Landscape Architecture Site Planning Developmental Planning ��\\� ``I®� March 27, 1992 crt Mr.Don Erickson • Planning Director City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,Washington 98055 Dear Don: As a follow up to our meeting the other day,I wanted to let you know that I was the landscape architect of record on Renton Honda. As I drove by the site the other day I was interested in seeing the condition of the plant material,particularly the large specimen street trees along the frontage. I was dismayed to discover that they had been severely pruned back by the Parks Department into ball shapes and have lost all sense of form. I am concerned that the Parks Department is pruning trees without any reason which is contrary to the City's desire for large,mature,full-canopied street trees. The trees in question were beautiful well-branched specimens that did not need any pruning whatsoever. I understand that there are other areas in the City where the same thing was done. I would be glad to talk to you to discuss what can be done to convince the Parks Department that this kind of pruning is not necessary. I would appreciate any help that you can give me in convincing them of this. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, Mark Weisman,ASLA WEISMAN DESIGN GROUP, INC., P.S. MW:sd 2329 East Madison Seattle,Washington 98112 (206)322-1732 )r w r - CACI r CITN 30F '' ENTON '- '` Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator PLANNING DIVISION CITv OE RENTON JAN 0 9 1992 January 8 , 1992 CERTIFIED LETTER P690 876 283 Dan Hixson, President Renton Honda Automobiles 200 S .W. Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: LAND USE VIOLATION LOT 4 GRADY WAY WEST SHORT PLAT Dear Mr. Hixson: The Development Services Division of the City of Renton is currently investigating the apparent illegal use of Lot 4 of the Grady Way Short Plat. This parcel of property, zoned B- 1 Business, is immediately west of, and adjacent to your business enterprise, Renton Honda Automobiles located at 200 SW Grady Way. Documentation on file with the City, file #SA/ECF 064-88 , indicate that your proposal combined three legal lots, 1, 2 and 3 of Short. Plat 100-80 of the City of Renton. Lot 4, the parcel of property to the west, is not included in your proposal . Question #8 of the Environmental Checklist submitted August 1, 1988 asked "What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?" . The response was: "The subject site is vacant, undeveloped land. It was originally used as a railroad right-of-way. To the north of the site is a diversified shopping center. Across Rainier Avenue S . to the east is the Sound Ford Automobile agency. South of the site across S . W. Grady Way is a mixed single and multiple-family residential area in transition to offices and manufacturing park. The lot immediately to the west is vacant, but beyond it is a manufacturing park. " 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton. Washington 98055 Dan Hixson January 8 , 1992 Page 2 Documentation, including photographs, verify that your business, Renton Honda Automobiles, is illegally using this vacant lot as a storage and display facility for new and used automobiles. In the latter part of December 1991, Jim Hanson, Development Services Manager, spoke with you about this violation and you agreed to remove all of the vehicles . This agreement was short lived as the lot is currently being used for new and used car display. You will be required to remove all vehicles from Lot 4 within 5 days of receipt of this certified letter. Failure to comply will result in the filing of a complaint in the Renton Municipal Court. We will sincerely appreciate your understanding and cooperation in this matter and trust that legal action to gain compliance may be avoided. You will receive no further notification prior to filing of the complaint. If you find it necessary to utilize this parcel of property for - any purpose associated with your business enterprise you shall be required to file the necessary request with the City and receive approval for this use. If you have fil ther questions please call me at 277-6169 . jai ".:•e t a- • Sse Co •liance Inspector Development Services cc: Ron-Nelson, Building,_pf.ficial_.... . :_. _Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator ,a Eugene Horbach E and H Properties PO Box 598 Bellevue, Washington 98009 File SA-c(o — 4B ) CITY F R EXTON ® Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator January 8 , 1992 CERTIFIED LETTER P690 876 283 Dan Hixson, President Renton Honda Automobiles 200 S .W. Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: LAND USE VIOLATION LOT 4 GRADY WAY WEST SHORT PLAT Dear Mr. Hixson: The Development Services Division of the City of Renton is currently investigating the apparent illegal use of Lot 4 of the Grady Way Short Plat. This parcel of property, zoned B- 1 Business, is immediately west of, and adjacent to your business enterprise, Renton Honda Automobiles located at 200 SW Grady Way. Documentation on file with the City, file #SA/ECF 064-88 , indicate that your proposal combined three legal lots, 1, 2 and 3 of Short- Plat 100-80 of the City of Renton. Lot 4, the parcel of property to the west, is not included in your proposal . Question #8 of the Environmental Checklist submitted August 1, 1988 asked "What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?" . The response was : "The subject site is vacant, undeveloped land. It was originally used as a railroad right-of-way. To the north of the site is a diversified shopping center. Across Rainier Avenue S . to the east is the Sound Ford Automobile agency. South of the site across S . W. Grady Way is a mixed single and multiple-family residential area in transition to offices and manufacturing park. The lot immediately to the west is vacant, but beyond it is a manufacturing park. " 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Dan Hixson January 8 , 1992 Page 2 Documentation, including photographs, verify that your business, Renton Honda Automobiles, is illegally using this vacant lot as a storage and display facility for new and used automobiles. In the latter part of December 1991, Jim Hanson, Development Services Manager, spoke with you about this violation and you agreed to remove all of the vehicles. This agreement was short lived as the lot is currently being used for new and used car display. You will be required to remove all vehicles from Lot 4 within 5 days of receipt of this certified letter. Failure to comply will result in the filing of a complaint in the Renton Municipal Court. We will sincerely appreciate your understanding and cooperation in this matter and trust that legal action to gain compliance may be avoided. You will receive no further notification prior to filing of the complaint. If you find it necessary to utilize this parcel of property for any purpose associated with your business enterprise you shall be required to file the necessary request with the City and receive approval for this use. If you hav ther questions please call me at 277-6169 . Sin e e , ) e t Ariur, a se C liance Inspector Development Services cc: Ron Nelson, Building Official Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Eugene Horbach E and H Properties PO Box 598 Bellevue, Washington 98009 File T _ • 41 .' CITY _JF RENTON "LL Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator December 17, 1990 • Mark Gleason, Project Manager Curtis Beattie&Associates, Archs 3131 Elliott Avenue Bldg; Suite 270 Seattle, WA 98121 RE: Proposed siting for carved wood bear structure at Renton Honda • Dear Mark: : We have reviewed the proposed siting of the carved bear structure and cannot not support it. The revised location at the driveway west of the existing pole sign along S.W. Grady Way is unacceptable from the City's standpoint and just reinforces our opinion that this object is intended to function as a sign or logo for Renton Honda. If we and others are to accept the notion that this object is in fact a piece of sculpture rather than a sign as defined in Section 4-20-2 of the Building Regulations, it needs to be displayed as such. This means that it should preferably wet be exhibited in a passive or semi-passive area where pedestrians can stop and admire it and possibly where seating is provided nearby for those wishing to stop and comprehend its aesthetic meaning. After reviewing the site plan, it would appear that the carved bear could be sited in one of the parking islands within or behind the front face of the existing building (see attached site plan), away from S.W. Grady Way. The "revised location"you prefer is within the zone abutting the street right-of-way where most pole signs are displayed. If the bear were located in this area there is no question in our minds that this structure is a "sign" under the City's definition. Incidentally, you need to know that this issue was recently reviewed by the Renton Municipal Arts Commission and they concurred with City staff that given the way this object was being displayed its perceived character was more that of a sign than a piece of art one would stop to contemplate. If the object were sited such that its orientation was less overtly related to the street right-of-way (a minimum setback of 60 feet or more from S. W. Grady and/or Rainier Avenue S. is suggested) I am willing, in this one instance, to administratively determine that its intent would appear to be more that of an "object de art" presumably to be enjoyed primarily by the employees of and visitors to Renton Honda, rather than being a sign or logo for Renton Honda. If you will resubmit plans that show the object so located, I will make such an administrative interpretation for the record. If we cannot reach an agreement soon on acceptable siting of the pole carving the City will have no other alternative but to begin citing Renton Honda for violation of the City's sign code (fines of up to$300.00 per day are provided for on conviction in Section 4-20-1 of the Renton's Sign Code). I'm hopeful that we can quickly resolve this issue in the near future. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at your convenience. I can be reached at 235-2550. erely, . Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 M • I F ,Ian L I, �i 1 lt - - 4j�j8 -Ce . -oFl UN2-AIR- � � ,•: -EXTEN4,ION 4 a 1' C ico H 7ur ` - - isrM�t�MM o�MTht TL,/a �-�7R: � .lv•-►�-iY 9a1Is- '6r #- r1 �' � p / ry : N F =MPT ENP of 1 �T. W/ �L GU�311.IG-, 6e4 ` s 0 • am1 �=j l 1 ' Aix-F o - 06rA11 FP I I- 1 1ING 16T�ir ft oll f i 51-4'/a G SY�L LS Co ct'T:'I r �31 ..Q' 1,-0,-TA-LA,5 e g'.la'I s 5�'��'' S b'�LL'� @ 11-r%�'• :�Av N! r; �_ . rt 11-7 :IpN� EhIU. UP, _:t/. ' — A1V-Q1' —/ , . / \/ • ., /� ��r. _o .. /_ . .- - - y3 � �� c.; G d G G • G ; .{5r 0!r • +W .. . tl ri ti.ii 17 - q -Az rri _ _ 1 . , II -I ' i1 .�.6rdl o ►I IDCISTINC� 1, l C p , _ / 1 -ii 11I-Q �7 - -.A. aI - a a. c c c c C., G- \ - • i . dt c'.. 6 - -ehed / I off U#?EP 6.U>2-r!='CTY ) �� f-I;'IWr,,'1p .... , • o • Q -- 1 "i 1/1-k.LL' E 9I-C7A:G-'7i'c II -1-+;��LLb© 5%.(011.' S`11- I I II• IQ /%;G!/lEP �� ieAy, • ( . ,� I I - yam, u - "-o" . G c �. C. L I I 2.b i,a -5 .„I 3 s",r�s ry ,/� - -C . ilie efiff#06 e , ____) C i I "1 '61‘ 1 1),,, LZ . • • . t.. /j. . . ___. • . •. ' \� _C r►zN/155D•Lc AT1 = • -_60U�.r •d7 - TO'NWP-LI- �ly f-� � 1 �1 f 5-G ; F0Iz PP-o Pos�r9. , ;, �o S I M • LIN>: OF so' I^IIPF F-°• iFNT iq'-o° > j&tt •3F�'R , I. f !IGHT,P rol- SIGN 24'-o'i')-vEIr-; CL q, - a 12H 0 RAW 1-1NP•s soU1-TURF - . / i/ % f Rr21-1 Po►.-1E12 L,I P5 1-J r-u -f ner.-1 "[T(r') ( �54H-TSTD - ;11 • 93 , CUTN>=R UT1uTY M Irs �� ,` / , >err-4pP7 6 W1-IR L GiorC `rr) 20-oll 5. ,T 6101 . . I G I 1 1--CANED IA/ PSI W-I N6 EMI-IT) • , ' o., ,/ 21-0"0 t A1.44C ..) GA12 � pl5PLAY / - = QLI is, G, 1�ISPl.�`* 1 - i r r -. �, �: , ,-1:- �t I -4- a l 1i3 • • H3r • �— — ———-- G _. O L F _ +?10.2� j�} �' .. — _. — —— — I�\—�(p ._.. —— _.._. J 1—t _±2Co. t... 2(, M — — — • q14.31 I� � u GuRr3�T Y GRor�wt&t ae- �/ ' Pr-K all-oF' ►sNTOr-1 5T�•N2 �`Wrippnihlt �i •-. era asA- t-exlsnriq 1-I6i141617 • ( �KFtN6*T� W GIrY , v/7 -53/ete#I / / CIM.H 'i ,,o/ � e /�r��IrGI�/ "Y;//oriaiv't 3G'-o(/ �-- Two-Q� J 1 ‘,7ei0-- � F T-Tye �� • . /' ra,PO51, 51/0--v-1-- > _ . . brad ° iiVa ♦.,714C/ .,ai• "atiga4 4‘69. . . . z‘adagrA/7 _ CITY YY OF RENTO\ r E C E I V E _ 0 n I + ;- I ,9 11 0 NOV 2 6 1990 :.••r•D i•• D11/MSia! too—g% CITY OF RENTON NA Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator September 11, 1990 Marc Gleason Curtis Beattie&Associates 3131 Elliott Avenue, Suite 270 Seattle, WA 98121 SUBJECT: Renton Honda Dealership/Bear Sculpture Dear Mr. Gleason: The Renton Honda dealership is located within the Business District (B-1) zone. In the proposed location, the bear is considered to be a sign and therefore, must be located In accordance with the City of Renton Municipal Code requirements. The B-1 zone requires all structures to be located a minimum of ten feet (10') from the property line. !' Section 4-20-12(C)(2), of the Renton Municipal Code, states that each individual business may have only one sign for each street, frontage of any one of the following types: freestanding, roof, ground or projecting or a combination. Renton Honda already has a sign for each street frontage. If the bear is to be located on the street, as indicated by the attached plan, Renton Honda would need to apply for a variance from the sign code allowing two signs on a single street. However, it is unlikely that staff would be able to support the variance in this case since there is no perceived hardship and allowing the variance would set a precedence. One possible alternative would be to locate the bear directly adjacent to the west side of the building. In this location, the bear would be less noticeable from the street and would be less likely to raise questions or precedence about excess signage. Section 4-20-2 defines a sign as "Any medium including merchandise, its structure and component parts, which is used or intended to be used to attract attention to the subject matter for advertising purposes." If the bear is located so as not to be clearly visible from the street and is not referenced in future advertising, we could support the position that it is not used for "advertising purposes." If you have any questions, please give me a call at 235-2550. If you wish to appeal this interpretation you can do so by filing an appeal, in accordance with Section 4-8-11(B) of the City's Building Regulations, with the City's Hearing Examiner. The appeal would have to be filed within 14 days of the date of this letter, by 5 p.m. on September 25, 1990. There is a$75.00 filing fee for such an appeal. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 w CURTIS BE ' TIE & ASSOCIATES 4 Architects 3131 Elliott Ave. Suite 270 Seattle,WA 98121 August 15, 1990 (206) 282-8512 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Mr. Don Erickson, AICP AUG 6 �990 Chief, Current Planning City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South RECEIVED Renton, WA 98055 Reference: Renton Honda Dealership/Bear Sculpture Dear Don: The tenant at the Renton Honda site has temporarily "Propped Up" his hear sculpture with the hope that he can permanently display it along Grady Way as originally proposed. Therefore I am still requesting a determination on the originally proposed location of the Rear sculpture. Sincerely yours, CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS Cl/trI Marc Gleason MG/mk CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES _ %5 RUG c - Architects 3131 Elliott Ave. Suite 270omrist Seattle, WA 98121 gagegri- May 29,1790 Rhode Island Mr. Don Erickson, .AICP Chief, Current Planning City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 f 4i 40t CITY OF RENTON ma PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Director July 16, 1990 Marc Gleason Curtis Beattie & Associates Architect 3131 Elliott Ave, Suite 270 Seattle, WA 98121 SUBJECT: Renton Honda Dear Mr. Gleason: In response to your letters dated July 2, 1990, the issue of the Bear Sculpture is mute for now since it has already been erected. However, if it is used in advertising or in identifying the premises, we will be forced to treat it as a"sign." As you and the applicant are aware, only one free-standing sign per street frontage is allowed under Renton's Sign Code. As to the question relating to sod lawn, I concur that this is not necessary in light of the eminent street widening project. If you have any questions, let me know. Sincerely, -'------ ,444) D Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning DKE/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 c,..,:..,:re (9nQ) .30c-0cso CURTIS Biz TTIE & ASSOCIATES Architects 3131 Elliott Ave. Suite 270 Seattle, WA 98121 July 2, 1990 (206) 282-8512 PLANNING DIVIS!(JN OF;1 r-,r,l Mr. Don Erickson ,. Planning Division j�'� '`I �' City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA. 98055 Reference: Renton Honda Dear Don: We are requesting a formal interpretation of the Plan Review comments for the proposed BPAr. Sculpture at Renton Honda, 200 SW Grady Way, dated June 10, 1990. Sincerely yours, CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECT Marc Gleason MG/mk cc: Mr. Dan Hixson Mr. Pam Putnam 7 -;.1 .r ` � CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES d iPai: I Architects / 3131 Elliott Ave. Suite 270 Seattle, WA 98121 (206) 282-8512 July 2, 1990 'LANNINU Ul\II '•�;:' Mr. Don Erickson I; �'1;'I Planning Division City of Renton ',.� I::>r+,t_. 1` : $- i 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa 98055 Reference: Renton Honda Punchlist Dear Don: The sod lawn along Grady Way has been placed to abut the backside of the - new sidewalk that is proposed on the northside of the Grady Way improvements. According to the Traffic Engineering Division the Grady Way improvements will start sometime between the middle of this month or the beginning of August. As we discussed last week it would be unnecessary to provide lawn for the unplanted area for the interim two to four weeks. ' Because the existing sod will provide the desired planting between the Renton Honda site and the new Grady Way improvements there appears to be no reason to do further planting or • provide a landscape bond for this area. I am requesting that this item be removed fruit the Planning Division's Renton Honda punchlist. Sincerely yours, CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS rrr Marc Gleason MG/mk cc: Mr. Dan Hixson Mr. Pam Putnam CURTIS Br TTIE & ASSOCIATES 100111 Architects 3131 Elliott Ave. Suite 270 Seattle, WA 98121 (206) 282-8512 July 2, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION r,ITY OF RENTON Mr. Don Erickson .JUL 5 1990 Planning Division City of Renton kECEl,VED 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Wa 98055 Reference: Renton Honda Punchlist Dear Don: The sod lawn along Grady Way has been placed to abut the backside of the new sidewalk that is proposed on the northside of the Grady Way improvements. According to the Traffic Engineering Division the Grady Way improvements will start sometime between the middle of this month or the beginning of August. As we discussed last week it would be unnecessary to provide lawn for the unplanted area for the interim two to four weeks. Because the existing sod will provide the desired planting between the Renton Honda site and the new Grady Way improvements there appears to be no reason to do further planting or provide a landscape bond for this area. I am requesting that this item be removed from the Planning Division's Renton Honda punchlist. Sincerely yours, CURTIS BEATrIE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS "C:2/7/1/\(44 - Marc Gleason MG/mk cc: Mr. Dan Hixson Mr. Pam Putnam CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES Architects 3131 Elliott Ave. Suite 270 Seattle, WA 98121 (206) 282-8512 July 2, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Mr. Don Erickson JUL 5 1990 Planning Division City of enton 200 Mill RAvenueSouth E CI V E U Renton, WA 98055 Reference: Renton Honda Dear Don: We are requesting a formal interpretation of the Plan Review comments for the proposed Rear Sculpture at Renton Honda, 200 SW Grady Way, dated June 10, 1990. Sincerely yours, CURTIS BE11TIE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECT —0(4/Lat - Marc Gleason MG/mk cc: Mr. Dan Hixson Mr. Pam Putnam PIIITO' .1 "O1ID1 DAN HIXSON ir r IINLI■ NUInM111111tY AUTOMOBILES PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAY 11990 April 30, 1990 RECEIVED Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning Division City of Renton Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Renton Honda Automobiles - Pole sign along Rainier Avenue File No. SA-064-88, Building Permit B-15001 Dear Mr. Erickson: My recollection is substantially the same as yours. More specifically however, my understanding of the square footage of the sign was that it would be under the 300' limitation with an approximate size of 292' . Please let me know if this interpretation is different from yours. Sincerely, 1=:=747/L---- Dan Hixson President DH:kb cc: Lonny Townsend John Keegan 200 S.W.GRADY WAY•P.O.BOX 4040•RENTON,WA 98057-4040•(206)271-3131 • LONNY E. TOWNSEND• • DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAWYERS 2600 CENTURY SQUARE•1501 FOURTH AVENUE•SEATTLE,WA 98101 (206)628-7783•FAX:(206)628-7040 ANCHORAGE•BELLEVUE•Los ANGELES PORTLAND•RICHLAND•WASHINGTON,D.C. JOHN E. KEEGAN • DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LAWYERS I � 2600 CENTURY SQUARE•1501 FOURTH AVENUE•SEATTLE,WA 98101 (206)628-7688•FAX:(206)628-7040 ANCHORAGE•BELLEVUE•LOS ANGELES PORTLAND•RICHLAND•WASHINGTON,D.C. R1UiouLOohip N&NI U ns® u I®to AUTOMOBILES 200 S.W.GRADY WAY P.O.BOX 4040 RENTON,WA 98057-4040 DAN HIXSON (206)271-3131 FAX(206)277-5232 PRESIDENT RES.(206)454-7433 I CONFERENCE REPORT NAME OF PROJECT: NtNITONJ O&)DA DATE OF CONFERENCE: AIi, .%%,i PROJECT NO. c. TIME: 2 '�® 4e2 (START) I() pe cA - (END) NAME AND TITLE OF ORGANIZATION PHONE PEOPLE ATTENDING cE) ( L 1 POD- C 9D( rL. .r nol n* ?ate--DP .( 4-0< soki „2-1. - 3 7��'O• L onAy se,,d Davl!, Wrr'G�� //�!1'ia,'i b /��- 7743 COL <e� 0. _ ' � Il ' ( i" 76F? .g1;h) 011M . /eter. COMMENTS: nroymJt) OL lia.v 1 Z Tirti5 Fett 364) 41,xarkxp 1. .PlIk)1 Avg Some I. S1ZA6 binar 6C sro 292 Sck_ F-� 2. JM1QHi • • CONFERENCE REPORT NAME OF PROJECT: KE OM.. HOWDA° DATE OF CONFERENCE: Al;)R . 31 Ig9Q PROJECT NO ' '63)b I I TIME: I I 40 A,i4, (START) W5,0 (END) NAME AND TITLE OF ORGANIZATION PHONE PEOPLE ATTENDING OERiq LI KED PLAKIKIIKX9 356-Z6So / Wit if/011/#411/ WWr© yW' 322 l 7 3- 41,2c <�z'� ON GU/zTls ,e 'o f/9sfOG COMMENTS: ORIOiM? RAW 23 � ;I`.g 31/2 ''0,4c, . Zc�' FrDPDo )tAtwI 30 ¶� , Z,i GAP, CITY OF RENTON • .- REnr`�,y l,�= ` _, ,� _ 3\ +_ a.U.S; PiJS1 I,P,.. .,,- I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT -� r _ 30 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 ; , .. - ° _.Z_,•.,,ti�r, 444.',(‘..7 " © , 19 Mr. Mark GleasonAPR 0-041 Azo 90 Curtis Beattie & Associates ''`"'trl/ 100 West Harrison Plaza ® Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98119 i:OT vc1.1,r HALLE •-----" �.;-. AS At;u iESSED AS ADDRESSED '° CEO te a, 5 y;� UNA6lE TO FCRWAi.D �� UNABLE TO FORWARD 6 N 0 y RE1r.4r TO SENDi R • iRETtf!'N TO SENDER .-. 3' ' . --. . ____ . __..__._._—_._.___._ _�' ii=i::i::i:,3:i1:,:iii:i:::i,:{,::iii::1=:{:i::a:�ii 4i � CITY OF RENTON "LL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division March 29, 1990 Mr. Mark Gleason Curtis Beattie & Associates 100 West Harrison Plaza Suite 220 Seattle, Washington 98119 Sitbj ect: Renton Honda ,. Way • Files SA-064-88, B-15001 Dear Mr. Gleason: This letter is written to inform you that the staff of the Renton Planning Division on March 12 , 1990, reviewed revised plans submitted to this office for an addition to the above referenced project now under construction. The revision proposed for the car dealership is an addition located along the east end of the building having a total foot print area of approximately 1,911 square feet which is primarily canopy over exterior display parking. The addition will have 661 gross square feet on the first floor and 542 gross square feet on the second floor for office use. We have determined that this expansion falls substantially short of a 10% building expansion, and therefore, is a minor modification permitted to the approved site plan. A new site plan approval application will not be required. Review for the building addition will be handled through the building permit process which currently is in progress. Parking requirements will need to be complied with to meet the expansion. Our conversation indicated that the net usable area for the first and second floors of the expansion will be 646 and 281 square feet respectively (927 sq. ft. total) which will require 5 additional staff/visitor parking stalls. The plans illustrate that this required parking will be complied with. We are also currently working with the Weisman Design. Group on a revision to the landscaping along the two adjacent streets, Grady Way and Rainier Avenue, modifying the size and the spacing of the proposed Red Maple trees. Because a search has determined that. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile 1206) 235-2513 Red Maples are unavailable at nurseries in the 3 1/2 inch size as originally proposed, smaller caliper sized trees and in greater quantity are now being considered to be substituted. Final details with this revision are still being worked out with the staff of this office and the Weisman Design Group. If I can be of further assistance to you regarding the Renton Honda project, please feel free to contact me at 2325-2550. Sincerely, Jerry Lind Land Use Inspector/Landscape Planner JFL:honda:dskll cc: Building Division City Cleric's Office MINIIIPirr- -.1MMIIIPmemill_. Pimminw . \.- CITY OF RENTON 'r ) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 7,-,?,`-a 14 T 04,-->\ if 1 i 77-ficZZ:L=4-! n -1;•• ilk.)-7 ---; . A211 4 'CO Fi:::--rt-1,-::7 c-,U,L. J i,I., 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 ) k P • • ,.,- 7,-41 f r-M E T Fr" OAS kk" '-: 401 066/ LI•- aZi 6 0 (yete Not Mark Gleason Curtis Beattie & Associates1/0 0/1/L q- 10 100 West Harrison Plaza, Suite 2,247e Seattle, WA 98119 ITOTWEIT------------ . ERABLE ---------._ ( .:::. ,, AL DRESSED 06E1 cn -.' Th TO FCR WARD c 01 L ehig m; ',:. • RETURN TO SENDER . ._ •% ''� CITY OF RENTON Community Development Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director April 4 , 1990 Mark Weisman Weisman Design Group 2329 East Madison Street Seattle, Washington 98112 'Subject: Renton Honda 200 S.W. Grady Way Building Permit No. B-15001 Dear Mr. Weisman: This letter is written as a follow up to our meeting held on April 3 , 1990, regarding changes made with the landscaping to the Renton Honda Dealership. As originally proposed, 23 red maples trees having a caliper size of 3 1/2 inches were to be planted 50 feet on center along Grady Way and Rainier Avenue. Because trees of this size are unavailable with nurseries and the City of Renton desires the species of red maple along these streets, a substitution of tree size and spacing has been proposed to compensate for the larger trees. The revised plan presented, illustrates 30 trees having a size of 2 inch caliper and planted approximately 35 feet apart. The revised landscaping plan is acceptable, and in the long run, will contribute to a more attractive street with the additional plantings. Your plan is currently being routed through the Building Division as a revision to the building permit. This letter will serve as your formal notice of approval for this plan. Sincerely, Jerry F. Lind Land Use Inspec /Landscape Planner JFL:weeisman:dskl2 cc: "Mark Gleason, Curtis Beattie & Assoc. Building Division 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 , ..,: . . , 5pt,oc,q--66 1 .. l , P . 411 ARCHITECTS ' ' 1 -- m • 1 9 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAY 3 1 1990 RECEIVED . { 9 F " c ='L- 4Cite /' .' A YKATE, PLEASE . r 1 3 , iiiii 'A.Q- 3 P . LI 1 4 er PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAY 3 1 1990 RECEIVED May 30, 1990 5 , , ?-1e.priug, !4) SRC; • • • • 7,f2,5/89, • . itof",T9 Ui13i . cpc • WPICh , • the liftle.of • • •J".c.3". . • • 1.1POn • . • good • • i .jti)e • • firm on ,• • .„ . , rt 4%• 0-0 CITY OF RENTON mu. k, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor _ Planning Division March 29, 1990 CITY OF RENTON lviAti3U1990 Mr. Mark Gleason Curtis Beattie & Associates RECEIVEL) 100 West Harrison Plaza CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Suite 220 Seattle, Washington 98119 Subject: Renton Honda 200 S.W. Grady Way Files SA=064-88, B-15001 Dear Mr. Gleason: This letter is written to inform you. that the staff of the Renton Planning Division on March 12 , 1990, reviewed revised plans submitted to this office for an addition to the above referenced project now under construction. The revision proposed for the car dealership is an addition located along the east end of the building having a total foot print area of approximately 1, 911 square feet which is primarily canopy over exterior display parking. The addition will have 661 gross square feet on the first floor and 542 gross square feet on the second floor for office use. We have determined that this expansion falls substantially short of a 10% building expansion, and therefore, is a minor modification permitted to the approved site _plan. A new site plan approval application will not be required. Review for the building addition will be handled through the building permit process which currently is in progress. Parking requirements will need to be complied with to meet the expansion. Our conversation indicated that the net usable area for the first and second floors of the expansion will be 646 and 281 square feet respectively (927 sq. ft. total) which will require 5 additional staff/visitor parking stalls. The plans illustrate that this required parking will be complied with. We are also currently working with the Weisman Design Group on a revision to the landscaping along the two adjacent streets, Grady Way and Rainier Avenue, modifying the size and the spacing of the proposed Red Maple trees. Because a search has determined that 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Red Maples. are unai lable at nurseries in the 1/2 inch size as originally proposed, smaller caliper sized trees and in greater quantity are now being considered to be substituted. Final details with this revision are still being worked out with the staff of this office and the Weisman Design Group. If I can be of further assistance to you regarding the Renton Honda project, please feel free to contact me at 2325-2550. Sincerely, Jerry Lind Land Use Inspector/Landscape Planner JFL:honda:dskll cc:v4luilding Division City. Clerk's Office t a r 3 �i`''' CITY OF RENTON "LL `'`, FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk March 24, 1989 Mr. Bob Stalp Lanphere Enterprises 12520 SW Canyon Road Beaverton, OR 97005 Re: Appeal of Site Approval SA-88-064 Renton Honda Dear Mr. Stalp: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of March 20, 1989, adopted the attached Planning and Development Committee report which found an error of fact and recommended the decision of the hearing examiner be revised and that staff develop an acceptable noise mitigation program. The report further recommended staff monitor the program for 90 days after installation to determine whether the program may continue, be altered, or terminated; and further required that installation of the public address system be conditioned upon obtaining an occupancy permit. If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office or the Planning Division at 235-2550. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON }� Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk Enclosure cc: Parties of Record Donald Erickson, Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Renton City Council FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: Renton Honda Appeal - SA-064-88 The committee met on March 16, 1989 , to consider the appeal of the hearing examiner' s decision dated January 4, 1989 . The applicant was seeking site approval to construct a two-story, 34, 500 sq. ft. building for a new Honda dealership. The hearing examiner approved the site with numerous conditions . The applicant appeals from condition #5, which prohibited the use of any outdoor public address system. The subject property is located on the NW corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. The committee found that the hearing examiner committed a substantial error of fact in concluding there would be a nuisance from noise spillover, while failing to consider provisions which may mitigate the volume of the public address system (similar to the requirements imposed on the lighting) to make it non-intrusive to adjacent property owners . The committee recommends to the council that the decision of the hearing examiner be revised, and that staff develop an acceptable noise mitigation program. Further, the committee recommends the council require that staff monitor the program for 90 days after installation to determine whether the program may continue, be altered, or be terminated. Finally, the committee recommends the council require that installation of the public address system be conditioned upon obtaining an occupancy permit. DATED: March 20, 1989 . t 7 John Reed, Chairman Nancy Matews �` �, �; � , '1 mac` - Kathy Keojker-Wheeler ZLF:as . CITY7 :20 . CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: December 16, 1988 TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Responses to Questions Raised at Public Hearing on the Renton •Honda Site Plan Review Application SA-064-88 At the public hearing on November 22, 1988, Mr. Blaylock raised a query about two letters he had previously written to the City regarding environmental mitigation measures imposed by the Environmental Review Committee, the City's "responsible official" under SEPA and Chapter 28 of the Renton Municipal Code. In addition, other questions were raised at the hearing with respect to the amount of fill to be placed on the property and landscaping of car display areas and potential storm drainage impacts to properties on the south side of S.W. Grady Way. The remainder of this memo discusses these questions. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION CONDITIONS In his letter of October 4, 1988 Mr. Blaylock commented on the DNS-Mitigated mitigation conditions. Specifically, Mr. Blaylock questioned Condition Nos. 1. , 5. , 8. , 9. and apparently, 10. These are discussed below and Staff's response. Condition No 1: Regarding Condition No. 1. the applicant requested that the language be changed to "limit off-site hauling by construction vehicles from the hours of 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and from 3: 30 p.m. to 6: 60 p.m. Monday thru Friday. " The applicant's comment also seems to imply that the hours of construction "only be from 8 : 30 to 3 : 30 Monday thru • Friday. " Staff reviewed Condition No. 1. and felt that it was fairly clear that construction activity, per se, was not being limited to the hours between 8: 30 AM and 3 :30 PM Monday through Friday, but that rather, "off-site hauling by construction vehicles" was. This condition apparently was 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examine Renton Honda Sito Ian, SA-064-88 December 16, 1981 Page 2 originally the result of concerns raised by the Traffic Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. Since the hours of construction activity were not being restricted nor was there any reference to restricting construction activities on weekends, this issue was clarified over the phone with Mr. Blaylock in the middle of October. Condition No. 5: Regarding Condition No. 5. which required the applicant to provide a "revised plan, redesigning and relocating access points to the site via Grady Way, including, but not limited to, coordination of access points, signalization, creation of right-in/right/out routings" there appears to be some misunderstanding. Apparently, Mr. Blaylock felt that the existing site plan was possibly unworkable without a traffic signal at the intersection of S. W. Grady Way and Maple Avenue S.W. Traffic Engineering had taken the position that unless signal warrants justified it, a signal should not be placed at this intersection now. In a subsequent letter from Mr. Blaylock to Mr. Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer for the City, he apparently acknowledges that a signal is not warranted and does not raise the question about creating a new site plan. Staff assumed at this point the applicants were willing to accept this condition. In responding to Condition No. 5. , Mr. Blaylock also raised the issue about the ERC and the Traffic Division apparently not requiring the applicant to participate in the Grady Way Traffic Benefit Improvement District and its per trip traffic mitigation fees. Staff reviewed this with Public Works and found that an oversight had occurred due to new reviewing staff in the Public Works Department. As a consequence, the Staff report of November 15, 1988, to you did contain language in Recommendation 1. that the applicant not only comply with the ERC mitigation measures for the project together with measures identified by the applicants letter of November 4, 1988,to Gary Norris in which they agree to participate in the Grady Way Traffic Benefit Improvement District at a fee of approximately $65 per vehicle (AWDTE) trip. The Traffic Engineering Division has since identified the specific trip generation fee of $72 per trip for a total of $71, 017. 56, as discussed in the letter from Gary Norris to the Examiner dated December 19, 1988. Condition No. 8: Regarding Condition No 8 which required the applicant to " . . .provide bermed lawn areas between the street curb and the sidewalk areas. . . " the location of the sidewalk has changed. Originally when the condition was imposed the sidewalk was to be relocated from the along the street curb • Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examine Renton Honda Site .an, SA-064-88 December 16, 1988 Page 3 to the applicant's south property line which would have allowed a the described bermed landscaped area. Since September when the Determination was issued, a decision has been made to keep the sidewalk as originally designed, adjacent to the street curb. The intent of the condition was to provide a landscaped area which would provide some visual screening and softening of the site to the high visibility of the site from motorists and adjacent uses and to the fact that the site is a gateway area into the City and to provide a measure of safety to pedestrians on the sidewalks. The applicants will now be responsible for landscaping the area between the sidewalk and the south property line which may include berming. The applicant will need to work with the City's landscape planner to ensure that the intent of this condition is met. Mr. Blaylock's letter of October 4th noted reasons why berming would not be possible and that the "vertical streetscape" proposed in the submitted plans which shows large street trees was "more important to create a positive image. Staff disagree that the proposed streetscape is adequate to meet the visual screening and softening of the site. Condition No. 9: Regarding Condition No. 9 which required decorative visual buffers a minimum of 15 inches to screen the lower portions of the parked cars, the applicants via the October 4th letter noted that they had proposed an 18 inch screen but stated "However, we believe after discussions with Mr. Jerry Lind that a 24 inch berm could be used that would still allow visibility of the new car dealership and provide the intended streetscape. Some alternatives for designing the berm are attached to this report. The applicants need to work with the City's Landscape Planner in designing a buffer which meets the intent of this condition. Condition No. 10: Regarding Condition No 10 which required a right turn lane on Grady Way to be shown on the plans. The October 4th letter discussion of this item addresses this as if it were a condition of development. The applicants are not required to provide this improvement merely to identify the improvement on the set of plans. Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examine Renton Honda Site Lan, SA-064-88 December 16, 1988 Page 4 OTHER ISSUES Amount of Fill: The applicants' application package indicates that approximately 10, 000 cubic yards of fill material will be placed. on the site. Some of this material will the provided through the relocation of existing materials on the site. Storm Drainage Impacts: Storm drainage from the site will be disposed of through the development of a system which releases the storm water into an existing storm line system. This system carries the storm water westward through a series of pipes and ditches to the P-1 Channel. Storm Water Utility staff did not believe development on this site including the placement of additional fill would result in the flooding of nearby properties. Further, flooding of the properties on the south side of S.W. Grady Way was apparently due in part to the flow of storm water to the east. This should no longer be a problem with the construction of the new 48 inch storm line which passes through the Renton Village property by the Renton Cinema, under 1-405 and then southwestward past the south portion of the clover leaf and then along the west side of SR 167. City Code requires all new development to provide a storm management system adequate to handle the sites storm drainage. Car Display Areas: A question arose as to whether the 5% landscaping required for large parking lots (10, 000 square feet or more) by Section 4-2204 (6) B (3) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. The opening paragraph on the landscaping of parking lots, Section 4-2204 states "All parking lots, loading areas and drive-in businesses, vehicle sales lot and storage lots except those used for detached single-family dwelling units, duplexes and those in enclosed buildings, shall be landscaped to the standard set forth in Section 4- 744 on Landscaping. " However, Section 4-2208 (2) I states at "The sales area is not a parking lot and does not have to comply with dimensional requirements, landscaping or the bulk storage ordinance requirements for setbacks and screening. Any arrangement of motor vehicles is allowed as long as (1) a minimum five foot (5 ' ) perimeter landscaping area is provided, (2) they are not displayed in required landscape aareas, and (3) adequate fire access is provided by per Fire Department approval. • - - • , tsc. t . • 'fa., 7- 37. s.1 • /I- h 77— "*"-`•- • ; . . _ '="' _ _ • . . . . . . . . _ SAI0• _ _ MP s. 6- • . , • A • .,•••••• " • . /4 t 1 • . • • '• f I, Il , 1111 • . (S) • • r , . 4 ?;'• • ,• ( • • `'‘ • 's.7 t. • .. 74' ''Srrief. •' • • (4444,',12.... ,;* .0 -1, C 7 or • -144, • • • • • PL4Iffv• 1 •• • 1_ I 1/4 ..' J ! r t;),.1 144 - - _ - �'` -_a .� efir `=-�7,�, AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 4th day of January 1989 affiant deposited in the mails of. the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. /64764/ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this Mt day of NO 1989 Nota Public in an for the State of Washington, residing at c o xJ , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: RENTON HONDA - SA-064-88 (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) March 20, 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Page 77 WEST FENCE LINES AS PROPOSED BY GOOD SHEPHERD; AND 3) APPROVE THE REZONE, SHORT PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. Upon inquiry, it was clarified that the requirement for air conditioning can be replaced by landscaping and a performance bond can be accepted for the maintenance of the fence. ROLL CALL: 4 AYES: REED, MATHEWS, NELSON, KEOLKER-WHEELER. 2 NAYS: STREDICKE, TRIMM. CARRIED. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR PROPER LEGISLATION. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Roger Blaylock, 10717 NE 4th Street, Bellevue, asked the City to support Citizen Comment: Legislative House Bill 1645 which prohibits location of car dealerships within Blaylock - Automobile 15 miles of each other since the restriction may represent substantial loss of Dealerships revenue to cities. He also asked Council to advance to the Planning and Development Committee report regarding the Renton Honda site approval appeal. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO OLD BUSINESS. CARRIED. Planning and F Planning and Development Committee Chairman Reed presented a report Development Committee indicating that the committee met on 3/16/89 to consider the appeal of the Anneal Rentgod�� hearing examiner's decision, dated 1/4/89 on the Renton Honda site approval e A royal SA-064-88 to construct a two-story automobile dealership on the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. The hearing examiner approved the site with numerous conditions. The applicant appeals from condition #5 , which prohibited the use of any outdoor public address system. The committee found that the hearing examiner committed a substantial error of fact in concluding there would be a nuisance from noise spillover, while failing to consider provisions which may mitigate the volume of the public address system (similar to the requirements imposed on the lighting) to make it non-intrusive to adjacent property owners. The committee recommended to the Council that the decision of the hearing examiner be revised, and that staff develop an acceptable noise mitigation program. Further, the committee recommended the Council require that staff monitor the program for 90 days after installation to determine whether the program may continue, be altered, or be terminated. Finally, the committee recommended the Council require that installation of the public address system be conditioned upon obtaining an occupancy permit. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Claim: Chappon, Claim for damages in the amount of $1,280.76 filed by Joseph Chappon, CL-11-89 24301-23rd Avenue S., Des Moines, WA, for damage to automobile as a result of hitting traffic signal pole at S. 2nd and Shattuck Avenue S. allegedly caused by failure of City to sand or salt icy roadway (02/06/89). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. CAG: 89-007, South City Clerk reported bid opening 3/9/89 for South Talbot Hill Pipelines #W- Talbot Hill Pipelines, 965; 4 bids; engineer's estimate: $297,619.00 (corrected). Refer to Utilities #W-965 Committee. Rezone: Oakwood Homes, Hearing Examiner recommended approval of Oakwood Homes, Inc. rezone Inc., and Preliminary and preliminary plat of 2.06 acres located at 763 Union Avenue NE from G- Plat, R-091-88, 1, general, to R-1, single family residential zone, for development of 10-lot PP-091-88 plat. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See later correspondence page 79.) Public Works: Clarke Public Works Department recommended emergency action to stabilize hillside Landslide, Lake slide area adjacent to Lake Washington Boulevard directly north of NE 51st Washington Boulevard Street (William Clarke). Refer to Ways and Means Committee for appropriate and NE 51st Street, legislation and funding. Emergency Action MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. t r 7 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Renton City Council FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: Renton Honda Appeal - SA-064-88 The committee met on March 16, 1989, to consider the appeal of the hearing examiner's decision dated January 4, 1989 . The applicant was seeking site approval to construct a two-story, 34, 500 sq. ft. building for a new Honda dealership. The hearing examiner approved the site with numerous conditions . The applicant appeals from condition #5, which prohibited the use of any outdoor public address system. The subject property is located on the NW corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. The committee found that the hearing examiner committed a substantial error of fact in concluding there would be a nuisance from noise spillover, while failing to consider provisions which may mitigate the volume of the public address system (similar to the requirements imposed on the lighting) to make it non-intrusive to adjacent property owners . The committee recommends to the council that the decision of the hearing examiner be revised, and that staff develop an acceptable noise mitigation program. Further, the committee recommends the council require that staff monitor the program for 90 days after installation to determine whether the program may continue, be altered, or be terminated. Finally, the committee recommends the council require that installation of the public address system be conditioned upon obtaining an occupancy permit. DATED: March 20, 1989 . Sohn Reed, Chairman LA/XL.v. Nancy Maews do-612P-7 - hek, Kat y Keojker-Wheeler ZLF:as . CITY7 ::20 .e l,; • RENTON HONDA (Bob Stalp, L;.aphere Enterprises) SA-064-88 January 4, 1989 Page 9 intersection which may need a vehicle actuated signal light in the future. The problem with the eventual installation is that there may not be the appropriate queuing distances and clearances. 13. Staff has suggested that an aisle approximately 100 feet deep be set aside to assure that signal activation is not set off by on-site traffic circulation. This requirement would inappropriately intrude more than halfway into the site and severely restrict on-site circulation. At the same time, the safety of the Grady Way arterial must be preserved. Therefore, to assure the continued safe functioning of Grady Way, staff, at its sole discretion, may restrict at any time the left turn maneuver from the site onto Grady from the westerly driveway and limit that driveway to right-in/right-out, or require its closure or relocation. 14. Property values in the area should not be adversely affected by the development of the subject site as proposed by the applicant and as conditioned by both the ERC and this office. 15. Circulation on the site appears adequate, and again these issues were considered in some of the discussion above. Maneuvering shall occur on the site and access restrictions may be imposed if the safety of vehicles along Grady Way is at any time jeopardized by this development. 16. The low-rise nature of the building and its general separation from adjoining uses should permit the passage of adequate light and air to the site and surrounding uses. 17. Additional (although limited) landscaping will screen the rear of the shopping center buildings located immediately north of the site. Small plantings will also be placed in front of the building. The incorporation of a gateway sign is a nice addition to the site but its design should be coordinated with other similar signs proposed around the city. Any incorporation of decorative sidewalks to soften the impacts of the site should be left to the applicants discretion, although if installed they should be subject to approval by the city. 18. Adequate public services serve the site and the new storm line under I-405 should adequately serve the storm water collection needs of this area. 19. While this office believes that a more aesthetic use could have been found for this prominent site, all in all, the redevelopment of this corner with the landscaping, berm, and traffic mitigation measures imposed by the city and provided by the applicant will serve the public use and interest. DECISION The Site Plan is approved subject to the fail 1. The applicant shall re-grade the site in such fashion that the finished floor elevation of the buildings and parking and vehicle display areas shall align with the curbs surrounding the site. The elevation shall be determined by using the elevations of whatever portion of the curb is closest to the area being graded and where an area is equidistant from two areas of curbing such as the eastern quarter of the site, where curbs exist or will be constructed along both Rainier and Grady, it shall be graded to correspond with the lower of the two elevations. Minor deviations shall be permitted to provide for positive drainage of storm water. 2. The site shall be surrounded by a landscaped berm which shall be not less than 18 inches in height. The berm height shall be determined once the elevation of the site and parking and display areas are established - and the top of any berm shall be at least eighteen (18) inches above the finished elevation of its abutting parking or display area. 3. If the plans have to be altered to assure that all delivery truck, and other maneuvering occurs on the subject site, all additional maneuvering room or turning radius space found necessary shall be deducted from the car display areas or building footprints and not from the parking areas, perimeter landscaping or berm, with the exception of minor driveway modifications which may affect the berm. 6, 4. All used oil, solvents, and other similar chemicals and agents shall be stored using appropriate technology and subject to the approval of the city's Hazardous Materials Inspector. V,9� RAi 5 The applicant shall not use any outdoor public address system. 6. The city, at its sole discretion, may restrict at any time the left turn maneuver from the site onto Grady Way from the westerly driveway, and limit that driveway to right- in/right-out - or require that driveway's closure or relocation. ib:" I! , ( < a.y.: . :`.'r: HONDA (Bob Stalp Enterprises) '" } RENTON• , :.vRa,phere ^ I :.'rt ..^ : ; j: ,'',1.� ,,j;' "?!, • SA-064-88 ,f.,t" i t f xi j• ;i'1, ;;tI ,f, January 4, 1989 , ( `i: i!,I;i' ,; `•iI'�'�;,i;�? I`i,�' is l'l a y j1ia'',1, i Page 10 il : ,� ` ,II;yf ,�, 7. The easterly driveway shall be limited to right-in/right-out turning movements only. ,,!; •I'ij, ' 8. The gateway sign shall be coordinated with other similar signs proposed around the city, ' and is subject to the approval of the city. 9. Any incorporation of decorative sidewalks to soften the impacts of the site should be left to the applicant's discretion, although, if installed, the materials shall be subject to approval by the city. I 10. The applicant shall design the intersection and install the necessary wiring and . channelization at Maple Avenue. ; . i !: ,i ORDERED THIS 4th day of January, 1989. . •. • is .. ...k .A (SL.+0,-.i.Y.,— ,,‘ . FRED J. KA FMAN HEARING EXAMINER ' ;i TRANSMITTED THIS 4th day of January,'1989 to the parties of record: , Roger Blaylock • , Blaylock Company - 10717 NE 4th, Suite 9 ' Bellevue, WA 98004 ' Mark Gleason, Architect . 3131 Elliott Avenue, Suite 270 __.- Seattle, WA 98109 `. l Caren Staley , Box 3407 Federal Way, WA 98063 Gary Norris Traffic Engineer City of. Renton • ' . Bob Stalp ' Bob Lanphere Enterprises •• 12505 SW Broadway : Beaverton, Oregon 97005 TRANSMITTED THIS 4th day of January, 1989.to the following: 'i Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke , • Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator i Don Monaghan, Acting Engineering Supervisor ; ,: Members, Renton Planning ,Commission Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal' ' Ronald Nelson, Building Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney John Adamson, Developmental Program Coordinator ,,,'!, ;• :. Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer : Valley Daily News f Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in . writing on or before 5:00 P.M. January 18, 1989. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,terrors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may•make a '• written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the ' .' ' ' ' Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such , ' appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal ' ' ' be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified ' ' ' requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance :, , ' Department, first floor of City Hall. , The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on=one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may "i PRELIMINARY REPORT TO 3 HEARING EXAMINER Renton Honda Site Pla; Dproval PUBLIC HEARING Date Page 3 of that floor will consist of parts storage, tool storage, washrooms, restrooms, and an area for the service advisors, dispatch and cashier. The second floor consists of 13 , 805 sgare feet. This area includes space for additional parts storage, employee lunchrooms and restrooms, a conference area, and office space. The eastern portion of this space is open to the showroom below on the first floor. The outside area consists of parking and outdoor display areas. The applicant has provided 93 parking stalls which include 2 handicapped stalls. The outdoor storage area consists of approximately 77 , 483 square feet. The remainder of the site consists of landscaping. The applicant has also included a "Welcome To Renton" sign located on the corner of Rainier Avenue South and SW Grady Way. The plans call for a special landscaping treatment in that portion of the area immediately surrounding the sign. 2 . The history section shows that in 1983 an application was made for site plan approval. This application was for a VIP' s Mexican Restaurant, but was withdrawn by the applicant. 3 . The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the project on September 14 , 1988 with the following conditions: -- a. That the applicant shall be required to limit off-site hauling by construction vehicles to the hours between 8 : 30 a.m. and 3 : 30 p.m. Monday through Friday. `lb. That the applicant shall be required to provide wheel washing for all trucks before those vehicles enter the roadway from the construction site in order to minimize tracking of dust and debris from the site. mac. That the applicant shall provide a bond in the amount of $2 , 000. 00 for street cleaning. .d. That the applicant shall develop a plan for erosion control subject to approval by the Public Works Department, to protect the subject parcel and surrounding properties from damage resulting from erosion of the site during construction operations. e. That the applicant shall provide a revised plan, redesigning and relocating access points to the site via Grady Way, including, but not limited to, coordination of access points, signalization, creation of right-in/right-out routings. These improvements should be subject to approval by the Police Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Design Engineering Division, and Traffic Engineering Divisions of the City of Renton. r PRELIMINARY REPORT TO..• HEARING EXAMINER Renton Honda Site Plai. , .dproval 1 PUBLIC HEARING Date Page 4 -71----11. That the applicant shall provide a revised plan which includes pedestrian linkages from the site to the sidewalks surrounding the site; and to adjacent properties. g. That the applicant shall provide a plan for controlling exterior lighting to ensure that glare is directed away from adjacent properties and public rights-of-way. h. That the applicant shall provide bermed lawn areas between the street, curb, and sidewalk areas to visually soften the site and provide a protection buffer between motorists and pedestrians. That all parking areas adjacent or near to street property lines shall have decorative visual buffers to screen the lower portions of parked cars. ' (Note: a minimum of 15 inch high decorative screen is suggested. ) j . That the applicant designate the right turn lane on Grady Way on the site plan approval. 4. With respect to the traffic mitigation measures imposed by the Environmental Review Committee, the applicant has provided the City with a letter of understanding dated November 4, 1988, regarding the improvements to be completed by the applicant. This letter was a follow up to a meeting held with Gary Norris, the City's Traffic Engineer. 5. The applicant has applied for site plan approval. Section 4-738 (D, 1) of the Zoning Code on site plan approval, lists ten criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Plan Approval application. These include the following: a. Conformance with. the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; % The Comprehensive Plan designates the site P g as suitable for Commercial uses. The project complies with the various commercial policies such as follow: o V.A.7. which states that "Commercial areas should be compatible with adjacent land uses. " o V.A. 10. which states that "Various uses within a commercial area should be compatible with each other. o V.B.4. whichIstates that "Site plan design should provide for efficient and functional use of land. " The Transportation Planning & Traffic Engineering Consultants TRANsPo Grove �� SS77 4$$$''�� EX IBIT NO. 7 ,M ITEM NO . S/9-® 6 -?r November 21, 1988 TG: 88329.00 Mr. Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Company 10717 NE Fourth Street, Suite 9 Bellevue, WA 98004 • Dear Roger, At your request, The TRANSPO Group is providing this letter stating their opinion of the probability of the intersection of SW Grady Way and Maple Avenue SW to satisfy national traffic signal warrants. Background Renton Honda is locating a new facility in the northwest corner of SW Grady Way and Rainier Avenue. Access will be gained from the north side of SW Grady Way at two driveways. The westerly most driveway will be designed to align with Maple Avenue SW. The City of Renton requested that Renton Honda evaluate the likelihood that signalization would be required at SW Grady Way and Maple Avenue SW. Signal Warrants The City of Renton provided 1988 traffic counts to Renton Honda near the intersection of SW Grady Way and Maple Avenue SW. The purpose was to assist in the evaluation of the intersection for traffic signals. National standards exist which set forth criteria justifying traffic signalization. These are called warrants and are defined in the national Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) , published by the Federal Highway Administration. Eleven warrants exist nationally. Eight of the warrants (1 through 8) are traditional warrants, having been in use over the last few decades. In recent years, three additional warrants (9 through 11) were added. The warrants are categorized below: Vehicle volume related Warrants 1, 2, 8, 9, and 11 Vehicle delay related Warrant 10 Pedestrian volume related Warrants 3 and 8 School crossing related Warrant 4 Accident experience related Warrant 6 Signal system related Warrants 5 and 7. The TRANSPO Group, Inc. • 14715 Bel-Red Road, Suite 100, Bellevue, Washington 98007-3940 _6, (206)641-3881 The TRANSPO Mr. Roger Blaylock November 21, 1988 Page 2 Meeting any one of the warrants in an indication that a signal could be installed. However, only the vehicle volume warrants (1, 2, 8, 9, and 11) can be evaluated with any reliability for intersections like this that are yet to be constructed. It is difficult to estimate future traffic on side streets such as Maple Avenue SW. City of Renton staff agree that the nature of the current land use would limit. the average daily traffic to about 500 vehicles per day. Renton Honda has provided the City with an estimate of its traffic generation; and at the westerly driveway, the counts would be less than the volume on Maple Avenue SW to the south. In the case of SW Grady Way and Maple Avenue SW, the traffic volume information taken by the City of Renton was compared to the national MUTCD warrants. This comparison was performed on a daily traffic basis for estimation purposes. Hourly traffic rates used in the MUTCD were expanded to daily counts using typical factors. Side street traffic on the higher volume of the two approaches (Maple Avenue SW to the south and the Renton Honda driveway to the north) would have to exceed 900 vehicles per day for the lowest warrant (Warrant 9) and would have to exceed 2,400 vehicles per day for the highest warrant (Warrant 1). This is unlikely unless there is a drastic change in the land use served by Maple Avenue SW south of SW Grady Way. Based on this warrant comparison, installation of a traffic signal is not justified. Summary Using estimated traffic on the side streets of the new intersection of SW Grady Way and Maple Avenue SW, traffic will not be heavy enough to warrant the installation of a traffic signal . Future changes in land use may invali- date this analysis. In the near future (three to five years) , there should be little justification to install a traffic signal until actual operation of the intersection demonstrates the need based on warrants that cannot be evaluated at this time. Very truly yours, • The TRANSPO Group, Inc. lEreZ ' C6�6bP.E.�(::JA. Wresident JAW/ndl P DM ' EXHIBIT NO.__S---------. .. CITY OF LANNING RDA0N NO. ��,p 61-�-- DEC 1 3 1989 - ITEM EMU /z - i 0- 8 V RECEV /tic r DEC 191988 ge4a-0.7 , 60 q . 2kos--,s- GrrY Rf�� N /z.e_ : AL,,aet s_,:te- , t,,e,„_ ' ge.e/vi , )7A,,, , f,:,/,„, : , Off &)7 dt7( 4 .1c-e ,telc,- 14'0Cel-er ,az-Ze . — g- N a /6, //46„tot,,J tv,,e_c_, e, ,_, 4,,,,c4_, . , t _ -e s7 -e' -t_ 4-ez--vt, /....eck-e•Lr,-?"": 4-Q'(A-e- e e2 lz.OL7 ;k r,yz,r1 , te gAt-fiL7/-/(2 --,2A-7-7A e:61(-e4-C,:<-64-y( ))/t-el-Cj i J./fc-ta 60-g-/-e- 2 1 pi7a az" 42:7, - / L (A , ,y,,,, e4 ..y_ic, ,,f - ,,„: &i-m--e-pliy-/L,,,,, ,,,,, -e,e-t a , 4721-2 --/) p • - , -if 2 - 7 y _ iev?‘ --z7 42,(774-,,,-4 79/ yy� P y v 0 : u __ �1 y Grip' Gs ry "" �'` a�a}� ", ��/ t' 12 DEC � / . tom: ,. 6,-- ,(, r.zze,e__„ ,)24-1"-'1'" 47 X _ %o 0 Y • F. RENTON "LL rt ,JJ 'g BLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayort •0 Traffic Engineering Division OV) ta„,,E December 19, 1988 DEC 19 W988 Mr. Fred Kaufman CITY' of T Hearing Examiner I-MARINO cumuli City of Renton Subject: Trip Generation Rates for Renton Honda Dear Mr. Kaufman: The Traffic Engineering Division had been asked by your office to determine a correct trip generation rate for the proposed Renton Honda auto dealership on Grady Way at Rainier Avenue. This letter and attachment answers that question. The City uses the trip generation rate from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual , 4th Edition. Most trip generation rates in the Manual are based on numerous studies conducted across the United States. However, in the case of auto dealerships only three studies were conducted. Because of this the proponent and the City Traffic Engineering Staff agreed that trip generation studies conducted on similar types of auto dealerships and at similar locations in the Seattle area would be more valid. The Transpo Group was retained to conduct the studies at eight auto dealerships. Their report is attached. The Transpo Group recommends that a trip generation rate of 28.59 trips per 1,000 square feet of building be adopted. The City Traffic Engineering Staff concurs with this recommended rate for auto dealerships. Based on the rate of 28.59 trips per 1,000 square feet of building, a building of 34,500 square feet, and a rate of $72 per trip in the Grady Way district, the trip generation fee will be $71,017.56. Please contact me if I can be of any further assistance. Sincerely, j� �,�- Q. � , GaryA.CNorris P.E. Traffic Engineer Attachment cc: The Blaylock Company 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 _,. The Transportation Planning & Traffic Engineering) V ants �` .�y SPO %Tr . DP December 16, 1988 tr' OP pip TG: 88280.50 !(lFcr Mr. Roger Blaylock tkir ®A The Blaylock Company 10717 NE 4th Street, Suite 9 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: TRIP GENERATION RATES FOR THE PROPOSED RENTON HONDA DEALERSHIP Dear Roger, The TRANSPO Group is pleased to provide you with the attached trip generation information required by the City of Renton for the proposed Honda dealership. We believe that this information will further exemplify what has been our contention from the start -- that the rates for the traffic generation of auto dealerships published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation (4th Edition, 1987) are much higher than has been observed on a local , Puget Sound area basis. In July of this year, we prepared a letter for your submittal to the City of Renton to document this over estimation of vehicle trips in support of lower traffic mitigation fees for the proposed development. Our letter was based on previous observations of several local Bellevue-area dealerships. However, the City of Renton now desires a comparative study done with a dealership within Renton (specifically Sound Ford because of its proximity along Grady Way). Per your authorization, TRANSPO conducted PM peak hour manual driveway counts of the Sound Ford/Suzuki dealerships six driveways on two consecutive days (because of the nature of the shared driveways and service facilities between the Ford and Suzuki entities at this location, it was imperative that they be counted and assessed as a combined dealership). In addition, the singular driveway of the adjacent Sound Subaru dealership on Rainier Avenue was counted for the same two days, and the four driveways of the Sound Toyota dealership (located at the corner of SW 7th Street and Hardie Avenue) were counted for one day. The actual driveway tallies for each driveway are listed in the attached Figures 1-A through 1-C. As it turned out, the location of Sound Ford/Suzuki along Grady Way proved to be of little importance, as over one half of the driveway trips of this dealership occurred at the northernmost driveway along Rainier Avenue (the main Service Department entrance). This particular drive- way is designated as "Driveway F" on Figure 1-A. The TRANSPO Group, Inc. • 14715 Bel-Red Road, Suite 100, Bellevue,Washington 98007-3940 • (206)641-3881 The TRANSPO Crow Mr. Roger Blaylock December 16, 1988 Page 2 Figure 2-A tabulates the Ford/Suzuki driveway counts in a reduced summary form which illustrates the averages for the two-day period and highlights the resulting PM Peak One Hour Period by shading the corresponding values. Figure 2-B present similar information for the Sound Toyota and Sound Subaru driveways. Figure 3 lists the characteristic information for the three dealership loca- tions surveyed for this analysis, as well as for five other Bellevue dealer- ships where TRANSPO has collected information within the past year. Included in this list are the number of PM peak hour trips that were correlated with each dealership and the estimated number of daily trips based on the PM peak volumes. Typically, the percentage of the daily traffic volumes occurring during the PM peak (referred to as a "K" factor) for the Bellevue area dealerships have ranged form a low of 10.8 percent to a high of 14.5 percent, with an average of 12.4 percent. This average factor was utilized to estimate the daily trips for dealerships where this information was not available. The lower rows of Figure 3 list the averages used for factoring of trip gener- ation rates for the conditions of considering only the three Renton dealer- ships or evaluating all of the eight dealerships. Figure 4 tabulates these generation rates for both the PM peak and the daily periods, as well as list- ing the ITE published rates for comparison. Upon reviewing the results listed in Figure 4, TRANSPO recommends that the rate based on all of the eight dealerships with building square footage as the independent variable be utilized for determination of traffic generation for new or proposed auto dealerships. This rate of 3.55 PM peak trips per 1,000 square feet of building space (or 28.59 daily trips per 1,000 square feet) shows a relatively consistent correlation based on a sample of eight dealer- ships. Given the proposed building size of 34,500 square feet for the Renton Honda dealership, this would result in a total of 990 daily and 120 PM peak hour trips for the proposed development. Roger, I trust that this information will be helpful in your dealings with the City of Renton regarding traffic generation of the subject proposal . If, however, you have any questions or require additional information, please call me. Sincerely, The TRANSPO Gr up, Inc. Rory D. Grindley Transportation Engineer RDG/ndl Attachments ' 112113188 DRIVEWAY A DRIVEWAY B � r`FUVEWAYC DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY E DRIVEWAYF TOTALS --- TOT INOl jT TOT�� \NO� �0 NO0 T�! IN: �� IN T� -___- __- � �0-215 1 0 1 4 2 S 1 2 3 1 0 1 515- 0 1 S 0- 3 2 2 1 1 2 2 4 1 1O 11 8 14 -- 0 O 0 4 7 11 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 11 14 S 20 23 0 0` 0 0 0 3 3 O 1 1 2 0 ` 2 O 3 3 4 12 16 8 18 25 ITOTAL 11 2 13 57 82 139 10 21 31 18 11 28 S 20 28 124 181 305 228 317 546 _ 12114188 DRIVEWAY DpJVEWAYB DRIVEWAY O0VEWAYO DRIVEWAY OFUVEWAYF TOTALS IN OUT TOT IN OUT TOT IN OUT TOT IN OUT TOT IN OUT TOT IN OUT TOT IN OUT TOT 2:00-215 0 O 0 4 2 8 2 5 7 2 1 3 2 1! 3 3 8 15 13 15 34 215-2:30 0 O O 7 5 12 0 3 3 1 0 1 0 2: 2 11 15 26 13 25 44 12:30-2:45 0 S 0 S 8 3 0 y 2 2 0 2 8 0: O 8 14 20 11 22 33 -1 2:45-3:00 0 0 0 0 5 5 4 2 8 2 0 2 '0 2i 2 S 5 14 15 14 29 ' 3.00-315 1 0 1 5 7 12 3 2 5 0 0 0 1 4: 5 12 5 17 22 18 40 315-3:30 0 0 0 2 2 4 3 0 3 3 3 8 1 3: 4 S 10 16 15 18 33 -- 3:30-3:45 1 0 1 4 5 3 1^ 0 1 0 1 1 0 21 2 8 4 12 14 12 26 13:45-4:00 1 0 1 1 4 5 2 1 3 2 0 2 1 4:: 5 3 8 11 10 17 27 4:00-415 0 0 0 7 8 13 1 1 2 4 2 8 3 6! S 13 S 13 28 21 48 415-4:30 2 0 2 5 5 10 2 4 S 1 1 2 1 1i 2 8 3 15 17 20 37 4:30-4:45 O 1 1 4 2 0 2 3 2: 5 19 13 32 23 --- S - 4:45-5:00 0 O 0 S 12 18 1 1 2 1 1 2 0 1i 1 18 14 30 24 28 53 _ _ 5:00-515 0 0 0 2 7 3 0 1 1 1 0 1 O 0 0 7 17 24 10 25 35 515-5:310 0 0 0 i 0 3 3 1 1 2 O 1 1 5 8 13 8 18 2-- 5:30-5:45 0 8 O 1 7 81 0 1 1 0 O 0 1 2 3 5 10 15 7 20 27 :00 1 0 1 0 6 6 0 0 O 2 0 2 2 1 3 7 8 15 12 15 -27 ITDTAL S S 30 48 24 10 34 15 32 47 142 152 234 268 314 574 ! ---' AVEFAGE-�-- ~-- S 41 21 38 133 167 300 246 318 564 ---- ' -F-8G,URE I-~A ��0Dl��0K P�� PEAK .�ERK��D KNDK�yKD��KL DRKVE��k�� K0 N K�KN ' ---- - ' COUNTS OBSERVED- At �� 7 -- - -- - - ��K�� SUZUKK DEALERSHIP �� «)'JP (6 .DRKVEWAYS, �-WO .-C-ONSECUTU. E- DAYS) :• . UL ; • SOUND SLIBARI 12i13I88 • DRIVEWAY G 2:00-2:15 0 2:15-2:30 0 i 1 2:30-2:45 8 4 10i r 2:45-3:00 • 0 2 2i 1 3:00-3:15 2 1 3i 3:15-3:30 0 4 4i I 3:30-3:45 7 3 10i 3:45-4:00 4 3 7 t 4:00-4:15 3-7 10 4-15-4.3n 4 3 I 4:30-4:45 1 4 5i 4:45-5:00 2 3 5i 1 1 5:00-5:15 1 5 8 f 5:15-5:30 1 1 2 ' 5:30-5:45 0 1 1 5:45-6:00 1 1 2 TOTAL 32 42 74i. 12114188 IN OUT TOT 2:00-2:15 1 3 4 2:15-2:30 4 3 7 2:30-2:45 ! 2 1 3 2:45-3:00 ! 1 0 1 3:00-3:15 ! 2 4 6 3:15-3:30 ! 0! 0 0 3:30-3:45 2! 1 3 3:45-4:00 ! 2! 2 4 4:00-4:15 ! 2 2 4 4:15-4:30 i 01 4 4 4:30-4:45 2! 4 6 4:45-5:00 ! 2 2 4 5:00-5:15 2 2 4 5:15-5:30 2 5 7_4 5:30-5:45 3 3 6 5:45-6:00 0 1 1 it !TOTAL 27 37 64 1 • .AVERAGE 30 40 70 .FIGURE 1-B BENTON PM PEAK PERIOD INDIVIDUAL DRIVEWAY T-he COUNTS OBSERVED AT THE 112ANS1O . HONDA SOUND .SUBARU DEALERSHIP • girovp ( 1 DRIVEWAY, TWO CONSECUTIVE DAYS) / • ; • i ! .• SOUND TOYOTA • . . 12/14188 DRIVEWAY H DRIVEWAY I DRIVEWAY J DRIVEWAY K TOTALS IN OUT TOT IN!OUT TOT IN OUT! TOT ill OUT TOT IN OUT I TOT 2:00-2:15 0 1 0 i 0! ! 0 0 0! 01 2:15-2:30 02 2 5 2 7 8 11 91 2I 1 3 15 61 211 2:30-2:45 0 1 1 1 2 3 7 51- 121 11 7 8 9 151 24i 2:45-3:00 1 0 1 3 3 6 3 3 6 2 1 3 9 71-161 ; I I 3:00-3:15 2 3 5 2 0 2 4 41 8! 1! 3 4 9 10! 19 3:15-3:30 1 2 3 2 2 4 6 2! 8 11 3 4 10 9I 19 I 4 C 3:30-3:45 2 1 3 2 1 3 1 5! 61 11 4 5 6 111 17 3:45-4:00 3 2 5 4 0 4 7 7! 14! 2i 4 S 18 13! 29 4:00-4:15 1 8 9 1 2 3 5 9! 14! 3! 3 6 10 22! 32 4:15-4:30 2 3 5 0 2 2 8 31 11! 1 I 3 4 11 11! 22 4:30-4:45 0 5 5 1 0 1 5 5! 10! 2! 3 5 8 13! 21 4:45-5:00 0 2 2 0 0 0 5 6! 11! 1! 5 6 6 13! 19 5:00-5:15 0 1 1 0 0 0 7 1! 8! 0! 4 4 7 6! 13 5:15-5:30 0 2 2 0 2 2 2 4! 6! 3! 3 6 5 11! 16 5:30-5:45 0 0 0 1 2 3 2 6i 8! 0! 2 2 3 10! 13 5:45-6:00 0 0 0 2 2 4 3 3! 6! 1! 1 2 6 SI 12 • TOTAL 12 32 44 24 20 44 73 64i 137! 211 47 68 130 163 233i • .•• • • • FIGURE 1-C The RENTON PM PEAK PERIOD INDIVIDUAL DRIVEWAY COUNTS TRANSI HONDA OBSERVED AT THE SOUND SUBARU DEALERSHIP crrovp (4 DRIVEWAYS,ONE DAY) • SOUND FORD/SUZUN DRIVEWAYS DRIVEWAYS I DRIVEWAYS DRIVEWAYS TOTALS AVERAGES ! / OUT �Tr�� °j "x` TO� rnr �� OL�� - ""' '"' "` ""' '"' "` ""' '"` "" : �� ^ "� ""'| u��-!��_- --' m/ 2:00-215 7 13 13 8 21 13: 15 34 1 215-230 1 S 2 11 12 29 38 21 7: 8 15:' 12 17 29 13" 25 44 20 27 47 *2-30-2:45 1 1 3 4 1 � 8 11: 8 14 22 11 22 33 2:45,-3:00 12 3 21 S 14 20 18 ' / 11: 11 7 18 15 14 28 3TN-315 | 4: 8 10 21 10 31 25 3 18: 13 9 22 22 18 40 � 315-3:30 4 S 10 12 8 2 B. 2 10 16 26 15 18 33 18 IS; 032 3.30-3:45 3 3 14 20 S 5 11 8 7 15 14 12 26 12 1 _ 3:45-4:00 3 S S 10 7 17 4 5 S S 12 18 10 17 27 12 4:00-415 4 4 8 8 10 18 8 7 15 20 14 34 28 21 48 4j5-4-38 6 14 20 5 15 21N 8 S 18 8 11 18 17 20 37 430-4:45 S 5 11 12 16 28 18 21 39 5 12 17 24 15 39 29 27 56 4:kl;-5:00 3 15 24 8 11 20: 18 26 44 7 13 20 17 19 33 24 28 53 . 5.00-515 3 14 17 11 12 23 14 26: 40 2 8 10 8 17 25 10 25 35 1 26 38 515-5-30 4- 2 8 4 12 18 8 1 2 8 8 S 10 16 8 18 24 8 15 23 5-30-5:4-5 4 8 12 5 12 17 8 20 1 8 8 S 12 18 7 20 27 8 20 28 5:45-8:00 0 4 4 8 15 21 S 18 1 S 7 11 8 20 12 15 27 8 17 26 -TOTAL 229 317 548 280 314 574 248 320 568 � PM PEAK HOUF� 78 85 174 ' FIGURE 2-A U K�^ ��0��N0 ��N � �nm ��'K��8�0�� 7TMSPO 0UU�U0�� SUMMARIZED �� KN��x SOUND ��B��X��x��«x�xvn� ��^ ~ �k ' ` • .• . . I.• .• .• .•• .•• SOUND TOYOTA !SOUND SUBARU -1 s- - ONE-DAY TOTALS i TWO-DAY AVG. DEC.14,1988 EEC.13&14,1988 11,11 OUT TOT IN OUT TOT1 r------- 1_ 2:0o-2:15 01 0 0 1 2 3 2:15-2:30 15i 6 21 1 2 2; _41 2:30-2:45 91 15 24 i 41--31 -71 2:45-3:00 9i 7 16 1 1 21 3:00-3:15 3 10 19 21 3! 5i ; ; 3:15-3:30 10 9 19 0 21 2; .. .. ....., r 3:30-3:45 61 11 17 3:45-4:00 400-415 415-430 4:30-4'45Z 2 21 4 6 4:45-5:00 1, 6 13 19 2 3 5 5:00-5:15 ; 7 6 13 2 4 6 515-5:30 5 11 16 2 3 5 5:30-5:45 I 3 10 13 2 2 4 5:45-6:00 6 6 12 1: 1. 2 TOTAL 130 163 293 34 44 78 I PIA PEAK HOUR 45 59 104 i 13 14 27 • FIGURE 2-B The RENTON • SUMMARIZED DRIVEWAY COUNTS AT THE TRANSPO HONDA SOUND TOYOTA AND THE ®rovro SOUND SUBARU DEALERSHIPS • _ = o M _ _ a C Z DEALERSHIP LOCATION BUILDING SIZE LOT AREA Number of PM PEAK EST.TOTAL (1,000 g.s.f.) (acres) SERVICE BAYS HOUR TRIPS DAILY TRIPS 0 0 SOUND Grady Way/Rainier Ave 56.29 38.085 48 174 1400 * 2 ai E FORD/SUZUKI Renton,WA SOUND SUBARU Rainier Ave 9.54 0.86 10 ** 27 220 * zi 0 Renton,WA SOUND TOYOTA SW 7th/Hardie Ave 27.80 4.05 12 104 840 * w >� Renton,WA z A ; ACURA of NE 20th St 20.50 3.88 6 37 320 v as 72 BELLEVUE Bellevue,WA AC HONDA AUTO SE 36th St 24.00 4.13 18 126 1010 * •c 0 g Mi CENTER Bellevue,WA 0 0 = (.0B-M 116th Ave NE N.A. N.A. 17 109 750 CO R s~ CHEVROLET Bellevue,WA C 0 z MICHAELS 116th Ave NE 18.00 N.A. 16 65 490 23 rri , TOYOTA Bellevue,WA rn Q rn PLATIS NE 10th St 29.00 N.A. 25 110 1020 r a 4 xi CADILLAC Bellevue,WA I rn AVERAGES Renton Dealers Only 31.21 14.33 23.33 102 820 0 All Dealers 26.45 10.20 19.00 94 756 *--Rough estimate based on averaged'K'factor of 12.4% as no other data was available. **--Estimated number based on size of service department,as an actual count could not be obtained. lsg0 i - • 'PM PEAK TRIP RATES 'BUILDING SIZE ILOT AREA Number of BASED ON: (1,000 o.s.f.) I(acres) SERVICE BAYS !SOUND 3.09 t 4.57 3.63 (FORD/SUZUKI 'RENTON DEALERS 3.27 712 4.37 ONLY ALL DEALERS 3.55 9.21 4.95 !COMBINED IITE TRIP GENERATION 4.58 N.A. N.A. 1PUBLISHED RATES 'DAILY TRIP RATES BUILDING SIZE LOT AREA 'Number of BASED ON: (1,000 g.s.f.) (acres) SERVICE BAYS SOUND 24.87 36.76 29.17 FORD/SUZUKI RENTON DEALERS 26.27 57.22 35.14 (ONLY I i TALL DEALERS 28.59 74.13 39.80 'COMBINED ITE TRIP GENERATION 47.52 N.A. N.A. IPUBUSHED RATES FIGURE 4 TRe RENTON SUMMARIZED RESULTS OF TRIP GENERATION °MANSPPO SURVEY FOR BOTH PM PEAK AND • H O N Q A ESTIMATED DAILY PERIODS GI"OVf e• %o ® CITY OF RENTON .211. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION MEMO RAWO ITEM NO. DATE: December 16, 1988 TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Responses to Questions Raised at Public Hearing on the Renton Honda Site Plan Review Application SA-064-88 At the public hearing on November 22, 1988, Mr. Blaylock raised a query about two letters he had previously written to the City regarding environmental mitigation measures imposed by the Environmental Review Committee, the City's "responsible official" under SEPA and Chapter 28 of the Renton Municipal Code. In addition, other questions were raised at the hearing with respect to the amount of fill to be placed on the property and landscaping of car display areas and potential storm drainage impacts to properties on the south side of S.W. Grady Way. The remainder of this memo discusses these questions. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION CONDITIONS In his letter of October 4, 1988 Mr. Blaylock commented on the DNS-Mitigated mitigation conditions. Specifically, Mr. Blaylock questioned Condition Nos. 1. , 5. , 8. , 9. and apparently, 10. These are discussed below and Staff's response. Condition No 1: Regarding Condition No. 1. the applicant requested that the language be changed to "limit off-site hauling by construction vehicles from the hours of 6:30 a.m. to 8 : 30 a.m. and from 3 : 30 p.m. to 6: 0 p.m. Monday thru Friday. " The applicant's comment also seems to imply that the hours of construction "only be from 8 : 30 to 3 : 30 Monday thru Friday. " Staff reviewed Condition No. 1. and felt that it was fairly clear that construction activity, per se, was not being limited to the hours between 8: 30 AM and 3 : 30 PM Monday through Friday, but that rather, "off-site hauling by construction vehicles" was. This condition apparently was 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examine Renton Honda Sit( lan, SA-064-88 December 16, 1986 Page 2 originally the result of concerns raised by the Traffic Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. Since the hours of construction activity were not being restricted nor was there any reference to restricting construction activities on weekends, this issue was clarified over the phone with Mr. Blaylock in the middle of October. Condition No. 5 : Regarding Condition No. 5. which required the applicant to provide a "revised plan, redesigning and relocating access points to the site via Grady Way, including, but not limited to, coordination of access points, signalization, creation of right-in/right/out routings" there appears to be some misunderstanding. Apparently, Mr. Blaylock felt that the existing site plan was possibly unworkable without a traffic signal at the intersection of S . W. Grady Way and Maple Avenue S.W. Traffic Engineering had taken the position that unless signal warrants justified it, a signal should not be placed at this intersection now. In a subsequent letter from Mr. Blaylock to Mr. Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer for the City, he apparently acknowledges that a signal is not warranted and does not raise the question about creating a new site plan. Staff assumed at this point the applicants were willing to accept this condition. In responding to Condition No. 5. , Mr. Blaylock also raised the issue about the ERC and the Traffic Division apparently not requiring the applicant to participate in the Grady Way Traffic Benefit Improvement District and its per trip traffic mitigation fees. Staff reviewed this with Public Works and found that an oversight had occurred due to new reviewing staff in the Public Works Department. As a consequence, the Staff report of November 15, 1988 , to you did contain language in Recommendation 1. that the applicant not only comply with the ERC mitigation measures for the project together with measures identified by the applicants letter of November 4 , 1988 ,to Gary Norris in which they agree to participate in the Grady Way Traffic Benefit Improvement District at a fee of approximately $65 per vehicle (AWDTE) trip. The Traffic Engineering Division has since identified the specific trip generation fee of $72 per trip for a total of $71, 017 . 56, as discussed in the letter from Gary Norris to the Examiner dated December 19 , 1988 . Condition No. 8 : Regarding Condition No 8 which required the applicant to " . . .provide bermed lawn areas between the street curb and the sidewalk areas. . . " the location of the sidewalk has changed. Originally when the condition was imposed the sidewalk was to be relocated from the along the street curb / Fred Kaufman, He--4ng Examine Renton Honda Sit Lan, SA-064-88 December 16, 1988 Page 3 to the applicant's south property line which would have allowed a the described bermed landscaped area. Since September when the Determination was issued, a decision has been made to keep the sidewalk as originally designed, adjacent to the street curb. The intent of the condition was to provide a landscaped area which would provide some visual screening and softening of the site to the high visibility of the site from motorists and adjacent uses and to the fact that the site is a gateway area into the City and to provide a measure of safety to pedestrians on the sidewalks. The applicants will now be responsible for landscaping the area between the sidewalk and the south property line which may include berming. The applicant will need to work with the City's landscape planner to ensure that the intent of this condition is met. Mr. Blaylock's letter of October 4th noted reasons why berming would not be possible and that the "vertical streetscape" proposed in the submitted plans which shows large street trees was "more important to create a positive image. Staff disagree that the proposed streetscape is adequate to meet the visual screening and softening of the site. Condition No. 9: Regarding Condition No. 9 which required decorative visual buffers a minimum of 15 inches to screen the lower portions of the parked cars, the applicants via the October 4th letter noted that they had proposed an 18 inch screen but stated "However, we believe after discussions with Mr. Jerry Lind that a 24 inch berm could be used that would still allow visibility of the new car dealership and provide the intended streetscape. Some alternatives for designing the berm are attached to this report. The applicants need to work with the City's Landscape Planner in designing a buffer which meets the intent of this condition. Condition No. 10: Regarding Condition No 10 which required a right turn lane on Grady Way to be shown on the plans. The October 4th letter discussion of this item addresses this as if it were a condition of development. The applicants are not required to provide this improvement merely to identify the improvement on the set of plans. Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examine Renton Honda Site Lan, SA-064-88 December 16, 1988 Page 4 OTHER ISSUES Amount of Fill: The applicants' application package indicates that approximately 10, 000 cubic yards of fill material will be placed on the site. Some of this material will the provided through the relocation of existing materials on the site. Storm Drainage Impacts: Storm drainage from the site will be disposed of through the development of a system which releases the storm water into an existing storm line system. This system carries the storm water westward through a series of pipes and ditches to the P-1 Channel. Storm Water Utility staff did not believe development on this site including the placement of additional fill would result in the flooding of nearby properties. Further, flooding of the properties on the south side of S.W. Grady Way was apparently due in part to the flow of storm water to the east. This should no longer be a problem with the construction of the new 48 inch storm line which passes through the Renton Village property by the Renton Cinema, under I-405 and then southwestward past the south portion of the clover leaf and then along the west side of SR 167. City Code requires all new development to provide a storm management system adequate to handle the sites storm drainage. Car Display Areas: A question arose as to whether the 5% landscaping required for large parking lots (10, 000 square feet or more) by Section 4-2204 (6) B (3) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. The opening paragraph on the landscaping of parking lots, Section 4-2204 states "All parking lots, loading areas and drive-in businesses, vehicle sales lot and storage lots except those used for detached single-family clr 1 dwelling units, duplexes and those in enclosed buildings, shall be landscaped to the standard set forth in Section 4- - 744 on Landscaping. " However, Section 4-2208 (2) I states at "The sales area is not a parking lot and does not have to comply with dimensional requirements, landscaping or the bulk storage ordinance requirements for setbacks and screening. Any arrangement of motor vehicles is allowed as long as (1) a minimum five foot (5 ' ) perimeter landscaping area is provided, (2) they are not displayed in required landscape aareas, and (3) adequate fire access is provided by per Fire Department approval. . , • • • . • . . .. . , • I " . . . I . , . _ ,—• -1_,_--------- 6 J,• . i . . ., 1 H . -rr—•-• . , . . . . . . . • 4 • 111H . .•,. ' :. 111111F .. _ _ . ..„....„_.,,,._,/,•••,,•-yr..,,,,,s ..44 I. . . • . .. .,:4 .. •5.! . .••• %,4 . •. . .,. „N. , . . • .,- v • -,, . . ••• r • • • ..... ) 1, 1 ••• .4 f‘O Ifilci. 1fP2: 111 I., ! ) k 1.' • g . • .41. i '4 r .. . • • •. , . I . , •. . . • . • • (CO ‘: • . ...... •va I 1 .• • i4 l' •• . • :1.11$ hi . . . . 1 •• ..: 1 . .. , . ..., ,....,.. . • • .,.., .. ..i., • ;t ..„ . ; . ....: ,„...1 ..:,.... .. 0.)i,; • .. ., ; , ....I. :. ' -' ‘.. :..'• ..! .r4( . . • . ',' I '• Il.' I i ... .......•:.• .• . . ., . . . . . . . ,. . . . . .. . . . . . . • I . . . . . . A - 1.. . .. I • . . .. . ., ,. i .. • . . ,•. . • , . . • • 1 - '".. '. a I ., • . . . • • ,. ---,Is/ . • ..• I • . . i 'i 1 • .. • • ' • . . . I • • .. . , . • • c., l•1 .......1 . . . i. • . • • • • I • 1.1 . . :. , C : 1 • .. . . . • , . . t Pi".• . . • I . t ...---"•-.„ • . . . • I.,,) . , . . . . . I • . I • . A i'l, *1, • • I n..', 541. -.: . ,... .; • . ',' .. . • . , ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . •-•:, -7) . mum , • . . . . ... ..........,:,...-k.--.,............i . • . . . ' '\.. .• • . . 1 .-r .4 ry. ,te-k:104.7x- !••.-.v.:, - . i• V- • v,.. ... . . . . . . -.I•, :1..lit: . 1 .> . ) . •. . . , .4 . .'f 'Ng••' . . i .. % • . . .. . • 0114:A 10.f,,--'--.••" . • /, • . .- • .•. 1 . ,° . •s .., 1,\ < , 77. r • . . .. .. kr•-•,,, -4,..,-...., . . . . . . .. . . • .. ....„_• , . . . . ....„. . . . . . . , d . • . . ilf) • , . • . . . . . , •Kii :4. , ,,,,,,, . I . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . .. . .. . • . . . . . . . • • . . . . . _ . . . . • '• S u Y cm, CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division EXHIBIT NO._ December 6, 1988 ITEM NO. S' O‘-�- e Mr. Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Company 10717 NE Fourth Street, Suite 9 Bellevue, WA 98004 Subject: Renton Honda Dear Mr. Blaylock: I have prepared this letter in response to questions of the City of Renton Hearing Examiner concerning the traffic impact of the Renton Honda development. The Renton Honda development is not expected to generate enough traffic by itself to warrant the installation of a traffic signal at SW. Grady Way and Maple Avenue SW. However, the future use of other land abutting Maple Avenue SW when added to the traffic from the Renton Honda site may require a traffic signal . Renton Honda should put in the necessary underground wiring, etc. , for a future signal at the intersection of SW Grady Way and Maple Avenue SW. The developer should also participate in the Grady Way Benefit District. Please contact me if you have any further questions. Si erely, 0,424. John R. Adamson Program Development Coordinator cc: Renton Honda file Guy A. Norris, Traffic Engineer . seinnald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 11 17-10: 62:24 F ILES DETAIL 1 . 000 WDG 1 . 000, . 0 , . X = RAWING FILED GRDUP=PCH USER=RED �, PN, FN=BL OFFTRACK.ING, III u- OFETRACKING IS EASED ON : 4'-a IN --� -t e 1 ) INSIDE WHEEL CUT OF 32 • r- r- 2 TRUCK �1HEELBSE OF 19E . 0 �' INCHES 16' 4 °_ .) --- - - - -- --)---- I-F T H LI H E E--L--U `Sr E R$ G 0 p----8-8-: -1---1*-CUES-?�- -.-------- - -t{, • A E • ,38B . 00 INCHES "4-' t-, If � . DFFTRPICKING RESULTS E i -O �RfA(lC�r 1 ) TRUCK TURNING RIDIUS IS 439 . 16 INCHES 3�;1 4 2 ) TRAILER TURNING RADIUS IS_. 251 . 15 INCHES 21-0 F120.1tEED 3 )...._OFFTPaCKIN.G IS 185 . 02 INCHES IN A 90 '.. 4'5' r EXHIBIT NO.. / . ITEM NO. �',f o -s)g : 21. . j \ . 1 ,STRT/CALL/FILE/DATA- M/USER/TEXT/SPLIT/UNITS/PLGTJLUGOFF- March 13, 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Page 69 Appeal: Renton Honda Letter dated 3/10/89 was entered from Voyce A. Hanson, owner of Site Approval, SA-064-88 Professional Assistants, 1100 Maple Avenue SW, Renton, requesting Council to uphold the Hearing Examiner's decision on the Renton Honda site approval request to prohibit use of an outdoor public address system. Ms. Hanson, owner of the building across the street from the subject site, pointed out that public paging systems used by other dealerships in the area are annoying to tenants of the building even through closed windows. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE OFFICIAL FILE. CARRIED. Appeal: Good Shepherd Mayor Pro Tempore Stredicke entered letter from Keith Dearborn, Ferguson Group Home Rezone & Burdell, 29th floor, One Union Square, Seattle, attorney for Good (Olympia Avenue NE), Shepherd of Washington. The letter relayed objections by Good Shepherd to R-015-88 the appeal filed by Neighbors for R-1 Preservation on the rezone, short plat and conditional use permit for property located on Olympia Avenue NE and NE 10th Court proposed for development of a group home. Objections are based on the fact that an appeal was not filed by that group in October of 1988 when the matter was originally appealed by Good Shepherd. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS LETTER TO THE OFFICIAL FILE. CARRIED. Executive Session MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LITIGATION. CARRIED. Time: 7:43 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Council reconvened into regular session; roll was called; all members were present except Hughes, previously excused. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 8:00 p.m. MAXINE E. MOTOR, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Marilyn Petersen 03/13/89 • PROFESSIONAL ASSISTANTS Total Office Services 1100 Maple Ave,S.W. Renton,WA 98055 (206)226-8189 RECEIVED March 10, 1989 MAR 131989 CITY OF RENTON Mr. John Reed, Chairman CITY COUNCIL Planning and Development Committee The Renton City Council 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Planning and Development Committee meeting March 16, 1989 regarding Appeal of Hearing Examiner' s decision regarding site approval request for Renton Honda Dear Mr. Reed: As an owner of the building at 1100 Maple Avenue S.W. (across S.W. Grady Way from the proposed Renton Honda site) and operator of the secretarial service, Professional Assistants, one of the tenants of the building, I would like to comment on the section concerning the public address system. Professional Assistants and the tenants in the twelve offices of the building are concerned about our daily business being greatly interrupted by the noise generated by the system. There are several other dealerships in the Renton area that use public paging systems, on Rainier Avenue and 3rd Avenue South, and the noise from their paging of salespersons is annoying even through closed car windows, while driving through town. We would seek through this letter to avoid these problems by requesting that you uphold the Examiner' s ruling. Sincerely, Voyc A. Hanson Owner VAHh PROFESSIONAL ASSISTANTS _ Total Office Services 1100 Maple Avenue S.W. 0' _ F NA - � " -- _ m—=== _, , Renton, WA 98055 °' -`;�,tav�+ � �a'; ` �% ` 11 �•-r-- '�- al.�r: C.� .- @ •G n Yosemite 5 Mr. John Reed, Chairman Planning and-Development Committee ilb The Renton. City Council 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 ti i ! 1 it [ l F i 11 ii i F i i 1 � 1 __. 1. '" 4� a CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman March 1, 1989 CITY OF RENTON Members of the City Council MAR 2 1989 City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South REC,E' OF Renton, Washington 98055 CITY CLERIC'S OFFICE Re: Renton Honda Appeal SA-064-88 Dear Council Members: Please find attached a copy of portions of the Minutes from the Public Hearing on the above entitled matter. The appellant alleged substantial errors in content. The only error was the inadvertent mis- identification of one person named "Bob" with another named "Bob." For that error, this office apologizes. Occasionally this office finds it necessary to respond to unfair characterizations of the Minutes issued by this office. While occasionally errors in transcription occur, they are usually minor and are not intended to inappropriately influence the outcome of a hearing. As I am sure the City Council is aware, the Minutes of the Hearing Examiner's meetings are merely a brief narrative of the entire proceeding. They are prepared independently of the Hearing Examiner, and are not part of the official Findings and Conclusions. They have no substantive weight. The Minutes are not subject to editorial review by the Examiner, but are an independent work product. They are edited by the Examiner, merely for clarity and spelling and punctuation. This office never • attempts to introduce any bias into the Minutes. They are prepared contemporaneously with the Examiner's Report by the Recording Secretary, and are not modified to reflect the ultimate recommendation or decision of the Examiner. This office relies solely on the original verbatim tape recording and the entire file of written material submitted prior to or at the Public Hearing to reach the ultimate decision. The speaker was mis-identified. The tape is difficult to hear at that point and both the owner and his representative used the first name of "Bob." The mis-identification of the speaker is unfortunate but the context of the testimony (as is evident from the enclosed transcript) is quite accurate. It is neither inaccurate nor distorted, as alleged by Mr. Blaylock. Is it possible the applicant was not aware that he or his representatives admitted the site had quite a number of constraints or that similar paging systems are mainly used in industrial areas? Many times 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 _ alleged errors in transcription are not borne out by the actual tape. People have difficulties remembering exactly what they said. Concerning the issue of noise, this office finds it necessary to respond, since again the accuracy of the Minutes were brought into question. Caren Staley was quite clearly disturbed by the noise. If noise. were not an issue she would not have specifically written and testified regarding the existing paging system on an adjoining lot. Is it possible the applicant wishes that that written and spoken testimony be disregarded? Further, regarding noise, this office finds it necessary to inform the applicant that it would be unnecessary to define noise as a criteria in the Site Plan Ordinance, if the only issue were legally permissible noise limits. Since no business is permitted to violate the Noise standards, the drafters of the Code, the City Council, must have had the unusual, disturbing and intrusive but otherwise legal noises in mind when adding noise, as well as light and glare, to the list of criteria to be considered in reviewing site plans. Merely because a business does not violate the provisions of the noise code (more a health issue), does not mean that they do not have an adverse aesthetic or land use impact. If reliance on the Noise Ordinance was all that was necessary in the area of noise mitigation, there would be no reason to incorporate separate provisions in the Site Plan Ordinance (See Sections 4-738(A(1) and 4-738(D)(1)(h)). Therefore, Mr. Blaylock's testimony stating that noise on the site does not come under Renton Code is incorrect. This office weighed the applicant's testimony and that of other witnesses. Obviously even with the background noise of Grady and 1-405, Caren Staley singled out for comment the public address system used nearby. Can the applicant honestly believe that Caren Staley thought it a non-issue when heard over the other background noises in this locale. In the applicant's (Mr. Lanphere) own words, this site "is a very difficult lot to build on, it is very long, very narrow, it's almost impossible to address all these problems." This office commented similarly and approved this proposal subject to some modest and not unreasonable conditions. Is it unreasonable to require that this business do as so many other businesses do - to simply take a message and have the message returned or have someone locate the intended recipient? Again, as Mr Blaylock himself testified in attempting to justify the use of pagers: "they're in more heavily industrialized areas, I would have to admit that." He also admitted that they had not considered individual pagers. This office has not required the use of supposedly costly, individualized pagers, it has only prohibited an antiquated and disturbing practice. Merely because it has been employed by car dealerships in the past and is still employed by some, does not require anyone to accept unchallenged an unacceptable custom and usage. If outdoor paging systems are an inherent aspect of running a car dealership, then maybe car dealerships should be relegated to industrial districts, not gateway sites. The 21st century is just around the corner. Further, Mr. Blaylock admitted that just because another car dealership was using such a system did not require compounding the error. I finally submit for your consideration the fact that an error in the Minutes is not a basis to reverse a decision. While Minutes are attached to the report it is only the Findings and Conclusions that constitute the Decision or Recommendation of this office. Again, the Minutes are only intended to serve as a synopsis of what is sometimes a long and complicated course of technical testimony. One final observation has to do with the characterization by this office of incorrect or inaccurate testimony. This office generally avoids embarrassing the speaker by ignoring rather than pointing out the speaker's mis-statement. This office gracefully ignores the improper testimony and, of course, does not make any finding based upon such testimony. Some speakers find the failure to adopt their testimony tantamount to error, others find the failure to identify their erroneous testimony a merciful omission. This office has also chosen to screen out the puffing and exaggeration which accompanies a lot of testimony in the form of promises, assurances, claims, and disagreements. I believe that this philosophy provides a better framework for decision-making and achieving a fair hearing process. As an aside, many jurisdictions require that on the filing of any appeal, an appellant pay for the preparation of the entire transcript so that just this type of situation is avoided. I hope this letter assists your in your deliberations. If this office can be of any further assistance please feel free to call. Sincerely, 6-1-4fr FRED J. K UFMAN HEARING EXAMINER cc: Earl Clymer, Mayor Lawrence Warren, City Attorney City Clerk • Renton Honda - SA-064-88 Testimony of 11/22/88 - Caren Staley: I'd like to know the volume level of the loudspeakers that will be allowed on the Honda site, especially at night when someone is sleeping and then you hear a blast out and it comes out and says Henry or someone wanted on the telephone or the service department's wanted or something like that - it's very clear, very precise and just booms out and I want to know what loud noise level they're allowed to have there. Don Erickson: The City, Mr. Examiner, has very extensive provisions within its noise ordinance and it depends on the type of noise and duration. You can have short blasts of noise that go up to 80 or 90 decibels (Boeing does that for example, testing aircraft) engines, other things that have a Ionger duration - the greater the duration the lower the decibel rating. It's fairly extensive - it's spelled out in the city's Noise Ordinance. And they would have to comply with those provisions. Mrs. Staley: We can hear every single word over there and if you're sleeping it just wakes you right up - you know the phone number and everything that's how loud it is. Hearing Examiner: So there's still single family uses across the street? Mrs. Staley: Yes there is. All of Ms. Staley's testimony regarding loudspeaker noise was shortened in the minutes to: "She also questioned the noise to be created on the site not only from vehicles but also the loud speakers." Testimony of 12/20/88 - Blaylock: Noise from the site doesn't fall under any Renton City Codes. It's not an impulse noise where its less, than 1 second and it's not a long duration noise. There's already strong background noise from the freeway in this area as designated by the Comprehensive Plan as a manufacturing park, office park and commercial area, without any long term residential, but we do have a problem of immediate residential users in the area. We don't believe that's really an intrusion because our operations are not out of normal working hours. Normal working hours in the noise code are anywhere from 6AM to 10PM. The Examiner questioned the use of private beepers - Mr. Blaylock replied: We admit private beepers can be utilized - they're an option I don't think we've really talked about with the dealer very much but we do have many users in the city that have paging systems that go out throughout their plants, throughout their open spaces and so on, however - they're in more heavily industrialize areas, I would have to admit that. But we already have that situation immediately across the street. Mr. Blaylock's testimony was summarized: As to noise - Blaylock felt there is already strong background noise from the freeway and does not feel this proposal will be an intrusion. He said in many of the city's heavily industrialized areas businesses are using the outdoor paging system. Hearing Examiner: Well does that mean we should compound it - I mean I imagine that's why this has been raised as an issue - it's obviously been an irritant to people in the neighborhood and they are concerned about another car dealership doing the same thing. • Roger Blaylock: That's true. Bob Lanphere: I have 5 dealerships that are in very heavy residential areas. The acoustics can be addressed - there can be noise levels that we can live with. Put us on a paging system is very expensive. This is a very difficult lot to build on, it is very long, very narrow, it's almost impossible to address all these problems. We can address the noise problem - they are adjustable. The minutes condensed the above testimony to the following: Bob Stair) of Lanphere Enterprises, 12505 SW Broadway, Beaverton, Oregon 97005 noted he has 5 dealerships and stated acoustics can be addressed; to be put on an individual pager system would be very costly; the lot is very long and difficult to build on, and feels it is difficult to address all of the problems at this time but they can be worked out in time to the benefit of all concerned. January 23. 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Page 20 full occupancy of the E & H buildings. She suggested that in the meantime, maps designating alternative routes could be distributed to Boeing employees to help them make informed decisions about their route and alleviate traffic problems. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, COUNCIL GO ON RECORD AS SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke asked that the State Legislature be lobbied to expand the geographical area for vehicle emission tests to mitigate pollution in Renton from large volumes of traffic originating from outlying areas. Versie Vaupel, 1402 N. 2nd Street, Renton, thanked Captain Don Persson and Lt. Dale Baker, Police Department, and Paul Lumbert, Traffic Engineering Division, for courteous attitude during recent meeting with North Renton residents. She faulted Boeing management for lack of cooperation with residents and lack of concern for their employees on the matter of transportation planning, and objected that funds derived from business license head tax was not spent to mitigate North Renton traffic problems. AUDIENCE COMMENT Bob Johnson, 14727 SE 145th Place, Renton, President of South Lake (continued) Washington Chapter of Trout Unlimited, indicated his organization has Citizen Comment participated in Renton River Days and has worked with the Renton Parks Johnson - Recreation Department in its commitment to the enhancement and preservation of cold Fishing Enhancement Act water fisheries. He presented a resolution recently adopted by the City of Tukwila in support of the Recreation Fishing Enhancement Act of 1989 and preservation of salmon stocks in the Green River, and requested that the Renton City Council adopt similar legislation. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THE DRAFT RESOLUTION TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION BACK TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. Rezone: Good Shepherd Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11 th Place, Renton, representing Neighbors for R-1 Group Home (Olympia Preservation, requested that discussion of the Good Shepherd rezone appeal Avenue NE), R-015-88 not be scheduled between February 20-24 since he will be unavailable during that period. Also, he requested that a roll call vote be taken by Council on any final action on the appeal. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Item 7.d. was removed at Council request. Claim: Peck, CL-03-89 Claim for damages in the amount of $75.00 filed by Mary Peck, 4106 NE 24th, Renton, for cleaning of windows and screens and increased water bill allegedly as a result of contract work on NE 24th Street watermain replacement (11/23/88). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Webb, CL-04-89 Claim for damages in the amount of $281.47 filed by Sanford Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South #3, Renton, for damage to residence located at 256 Chelan Avenue SE allegedly caused by sewer backup and faulty installation of main sewer line (12/21/88). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Finance: Limited and Finance Department submitted ordinance authorizing sale of Limited and Unlimited Tax General Unlimited General Obligation Bonds for capital improvements, replacing Obligation Bonds for equipment and senior housing to low bidder (bid opening scheduled for Capital Improvements and 2/6/89). Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See later action.) Senior Housing .Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler asked that the spelling of her name be corrected in the preliminary official bond statement. Citizen Comment: Hazen Mayor Clymer transmitted request from Hazen High School Class of 1990 for High School Request for waiver of fee to use Community Center for spring prom. Refer to Park Community Center Fee Board for report back to Council. Waiver Public Works: City Hall Public Works Department requested additional $39,000 to meet environmental Off-Site Parking on Main and Code requirements for City Hall off-site parking on Main Avenue. Avenue Refer to Community Services Committee. Public Works: Consultant Public Works Department requested authorization to retain consultant to to Review Departmental review Public Works departmental structure. Refer to Community Services Structure Committee. Renton Honda Site Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision filed regarding site approval request Approval, SA-064-88 by Renton Honda, Lanphere Enterprises, for proposed automobile dealership located on the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South, File No. SA-064-88. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. CI'iY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: 01/23/89 Dept/Div/Board.. Finance/City Clerk Staff Contact.. M. Petersen AGENDA STATUS: Consent X SUBJECT: Appeal of hearing examiner's Public Hearing.. decision on Renton Honda Site Approval, Correspondence.. File No. SA-064-88 Ordinance Resolution Old Business.... EXHIBITS: City clerk's letter New Business.... Letter of appeal Study Session... Hearing examiner's report, 01/04/89 Other RECOMMENDED ACTION: I APPROVALS: Refer to Planning & Development Committee I Legal Dept I Finance Dept.... I Other FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated... SUMMARY OF ACTION: CITY OF RENTON NAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk January 19, 1989 APPEAL FILED BY ROGER BLAYLOCK REPRESENTING RENTON HONDA, LANPHERE ENTERPRISES RE: Appeal of hearing examiner's decision, dated January 4, 1989, regarding site approval request for Renton Honda, File No. SA-064-88. To parties of record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the hearing examiner's decision on the referenced matter has been filed with the city clerk, along with the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee, and the recommendation of the Committee will be considered by the City Council at a subsequent Council meeting. The council secretary will notify all parties of record either by mail or telephone of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish to be notified of the meeting, please call the council secretary at 235-2586 any weekday after 1:00 p.m. for information. Sincerely, Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 5 CITY OF RENTON No 30654 FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 / /F 19 __ CEIVED OF ]3( (cc/ CIO P •t. (I i --y Received by TOTAL ! 5 O C) •,3 • WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICATION NAME: RENTON HONDA FILE NO. SA-064-88 BOB STALP / LANPHERE ENTERPRISES The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the Decision of Recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated JANUARLY 4, 1989. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY. APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) : Name: BOB STALP Name: ROGER BLAYLOCK LANPHERE ENTERPRISES THE BLAYLOCK CO. Address: 12520 S. W. CANYON ROAD Address: 10717 N. E. 4TH, SUITE 9 BEAVERTON, OR 97005 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 Telephone No. (503) 643-5577 Telephone No. (206) 455-1550 SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors of law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDINGS OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's Report) MINUTES Error:OMISSION OF EXPERIENCE WITH 5 LOCATIONS ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL AREAS WITH. SUCCESSFUL CONTROL OF THE ACOUSTICS OF THE PUBLIC ADDRESS AND SYSTEM. INCORRECT IDENTIFICATION OF PERSON TESTIFYING. Correction: COUNCIL REVIEW A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF MR. LANPHERE'S TESTIMONY. CONCLUSIONS: No. 11 Error:THERE IS NO SUBSTANTIATION IN THE RECORD OF NOISE COMPLAINTS ABOUT OTHER CAR DEALERSHIPS IN THE AREA. IN FACT, THE STAFF REPORT SAYS "NOISE AND GLARE ARE NOT EXPECTED TO BE A PROBLEM." Correction: (SEE ATTACHED) OTHER: No. Error: Correction: 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) Reverse the Decision or Recommendation and grant the following relief: XXXXX Modify the Decision or Recommendation as follows: MODIFY CONDITION #5 TO REQUIRE THAT ANY PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM INSTALLED BE LOCATED ALONG THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE WITH DIRECTIONAL SPEAKERS AIMED INWARD. Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other: (9F91 A lic nt Represe Pp Sntative gnature - Date e_c . -RL„, C�M� Note: Please refer to Title IV, Chapter 30 of the Renton Municipal, Code, and Sections 4-3016 and 4-3017, specifically (see reverse side of page) for specific appeal procedures. CITY OF RENTON • JAN i o 1989 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE :1 THE BLAY .00ft COMPANY n specialists in land-use procedures January 18, 1989 Renton City Council 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: APPEAL / RENTON HONDA / LANPHERE ENTERPRISES FILE NUMBER SA-064-88 Dear Council Members: INTRODUCTION Lanphere Enterprises is appealing Condition #5 of the City of Renton Hearing Examiner's ("Examiner" ) decision, dated January 4, 1989, in which he prohibited the use of "any outdoor public address system" . Lanphere Enterprises disagrees with the Examiner' s decision and respectfully requests that the Council modify the condition. ARGUMENT The Examiner conducted two public hearings: November 22, 1988 and December 20, 1988 . The decision reached by the Examiner prohibiting the outdoor public address system is not based on the public record, City codes, or adopted policies. The lack of any substantiating evidence in the record suggests that the decision is based solely on the subjective opinion of the Examiner. The City Council is the legislative body of the City establishing policies, the Examiner's action is a de facto amendment to the Noise Ordinance as found in Title 8, Chapter 11, of the City of Renton Municipal Code. 107171E Fourth Street,Suite 9 0 Bellevue,Washington 98004 0 (206)455-1550 Renton Honda Appeal File Number SA-064-88 January 18, 1989 page 2 ERROR #1 An error in the minutes is the omission of the fact that residential uses are adjacent to dealerships that are presently operated by Lanphere Enterprises in Oregon. Lanphere Enterprises has been successful in controlling acoustics to avoid complaints from residential neighbors. Therefore, it could be assumed that noise could be mitigated on this site designated for commercial use and adjacent to future manufacturing park uses when Mr. Lanphere has successfully dealt with the issue in an even more sensitive areas. In the written record his brief two minute testimony is distorted and reported inaccurately. The minutes state "he has 5 dealerships and stated acoustics can be addressed; to be put on an individual pager system would be very costly; the lot is very long and difficult to build on, and feels it is difficult to address all of the problems at this time but they can be worked out in time to the benefit of all concerned. " It was. Mr. Bob Lanphere, owner of Lanphere Enterprises, who testified on the issue of the public address system, rather than Mr. Bob Stalp. We would suggest that the City Council request that the Examiner's office provide a verbatim transcript of Mr. Lanphere' s testimony to have accurate information on which to base their decision. ERROR #2 (Finding #31/ Conclusion #11) The Examiner statesthat "complaints have been received regarding the use of public address systems by car dealerships in general, and particularly in this area as used by the dealership across Rainier. " Yet the record, presented before the Examiner did not substantiate any of the references made to "noise complaints" . • Renton Honda Appeal File Number SA-064-88 January 18, 1989 page 3 Mrs. Caren Staley "questioned the noise to be created on the site not only from -vehicles but also the loud speakers" . (page 3, paragraph 1 of minutes) Mrs. Jeanette Samek-McKague, Senior Planner, in response suggested that the app could possibly check into the use of individual pa es (page 3, paragraph 4 of minutes) . In fact the staff reports present a positive position and state that "Since residential uses do not exist in the vicinity noise and ,glare are not expected to be a problem in that sense either. " [Mitigation of impact to surrounding properties and uses, (page 5, paragraph 2) - Preliminary Report To The Hearing Examiner, dated ? (presumably November 15, 1988) ] Mr. Blaylock, responding for the applicant, pointed to the fact that "there is already strong background noise from the freeway and does not feel this proposal will be an intrusion. He stated that many of the city's heavily industrialization areas business are using the outdoor paging system. " (page 4, paragraph 3 of minutes) . While ironically, the Examiner ignores his own finding #10 in which he states: "Grady Way is generally less retail oriented, especially west of the subject site where smaller office and industrial parks predominate. East, across Rainier, are a variety of uses including another automobile dealership, a hotel complex, movie theater and shopping center. An anomaly in this area are the remaining single family homes generally located between Grady Way and I-405 immediately south of the subject site. These are older homes which predate the construction of I-405 and the general .transition which has occurred in this area over the last 10 to 15 years. " [Emphasis added] Instead the Examiner, in Conclusion #11, focuses on what he subjectively believes should not be the applicant' s "exclusive right" to indiscriminately use the air on, or surrounding the site and foul it with noise. Renton Honda Appeal File Number SA-064-88 January 18, 1989 page 4 However, the Examiner' s zest in modifying the City' s Noise Ordinance for this specific site distorts the equal application of the law. The Examiner admits, in the second sentence of Conclusion #11, that the outdoor public address system is appropriate within the minimum standards for noise regulation in the City of Renton. Under the General Criteria of Section 4-738 (h) , the Examiner is charged with considering the "Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions" . As part of the site plan review process, any inappropriate noise could be mitigated by modifying the direction and intensity of noise. Normally large public address systems are placed on the outside of the building and directed out into the parking and car display areas. This design can be reversed by mounting directional speakers at perimeter locations and focusing them inward. In the site plan review process, a similar design issue of illumination and its impact on adjacent uses was resolved, the applicant was charged with mitigating glare by directing light inward on the site. It should be suggested that the function of the Site Plan Review Process should first to be design with the last position being to prohibit. We would therefore request that the City Council include a condition that requires any public address system installed be located along the perimeter of the subject site with directional speakers aimed inward. erely, tt7:;(4014, Urjet Roger J. Blay ock 0117APEL.DOC • 0 CITY OF RENTON .JL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: December 16, 1988 TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Responses to Questions Raised at Public Hearing on the Renton Honda Site Plan Review Application SA-064-88 At the public hearing on November 22, 1988, Mr. Blaylock raised a query about two letters he had previously written to the City regarding environmental mitigation measures imposed by the Environmental Review Committee, the City's "responsible official" under SEPA and Chapter 28 of the Renton Municipal Code. In addition, other questions were ti raised at the hearing with respect to the amount of fill to be placed on the property and landscaping of car display areas and potential storm drainage impacts to properties on the south side of S.W. Grady Way. The remainder of this memo discusses these questions. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION CONDITIONS In his letter of October 4, 1988 Mr. Blaylock commented on the DNS-Mitigated mitigation conditions. Specifically, Mr. ' Blaylock questioned Condition Nos. 1. , 5. , 8. , 9. and apparently, 10. These are discussed below and Staff's response. Condition No 1: Regarding Condition No. 1. the applicant requested that the language be changed to "limit off-site hauling by construction vehicles from the hours of 6: 30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and from 3 : 30 p.m. to 6: 60 p.m. Monday thru Friday. " The applicant's comment also seems to imply that the hours of construction "only be from 8 : 30 to 3 : 30 Monday thru • Friday. " Staff reviewed Condition No. 1. and felt that it was fairly clear that construction activity, per se, was not being limited to the hours between 8 : 30 AM and 3: 30 PM Monday through Friday, but that rather, "off-site hauling by construction vehicles" was. This condition apparently was 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examine Renton Honda Site Lan, SA-064-88 December 16, 198E Page 2 originally the result of concerns raised by the Traffic Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. Since the hours of construction activity were not being restricted nor was there any reference to restricting construction activities on weekends, this issue was clarified over the phone with Mr. Blaylock in the middle of October. Condition No. 5: Regarding Condition No. 5. which required the applicant to provide a "revised plan, redesigning and relocating access points to the site via Grady Way, including, but not limited to, coordination of access points, signalization, creation of right-in/right/out routings" there appears to be some misunderstanding. Apparently, Mr. Blaylock felt that the existing site plan was possibly unworkable without a traffic signal at the intersection of S. W. Grady Way and Maple Avenue S.W. Traffic Engineering had taken the position that unless signal warrants justified it, a signal should not be placed at this intersection now. In a subsequent letter from Mr. Blaylock to Mr. Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer for the City, he apparently acknowledges that a signal is not warranted and does not raise the question about creating a new site plan. Staff assumed at this point the applicants were willing to accept this condition. In responding to Condition No. 5. , Mr. Blaylock also raised the issue about the ERC and the Traffic Division apparently not requiring the applicant to participate in the Grady Way Traffic Benefit Improvement District and its per trip traffic mitigation fees. Staff reviewed this with Public Works and found that an oversight had occurred due to new reviewing staff in the Public Works Department. As a consequence, the Staff report of November 15, 1988, to you did contain language in Recommendation 1. that the applicant not only comply with the ERC mitigation measures for the project together with measures identified by the applicants letter of November 4, 1988,to Gary Norris in which they agree to participate in the Grady Way Traffic Benefit Improvement District at a fee of approximately $65 per vehicle (AWDTE) trip. The Traffic Engineering Division has since identified the specific trip generation fee of $72 per trip for a total of $71, 017.56, as discussed in the letter from Gary Norris to the Examiner dated December 19, 1988. Condition No. 8: Regarding Condition No 8 which required the applicant to " . . .provide bermed lawn areas between the street curb and the sidewalk areas. . . " the location of the sidewalk has changed. Originally when the condition was imposed the sidewalk was to be relocated from the along the street curb Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examine Renton Honda Site Lan, SA-064-88 December 16, 1988 Page 3 to the applicant's south property line which would have allowed a the described bermed landscaped area. Since September when the Determination was issued, a decision has been made to keep the sidewalk as originally designed, adjacent to the street curb. The intent of the condition was to provide a landscaped area which would provide some visual screening and softening of the site to the high visibility of the site from motorists and adjacent uses and to the fact that the site is a gateway area into the City and to provide a measure of safety to pedestrians on the sidewalks. The applicants will now be responsible for landscaping the area between the sidewalk and the south property line which may include berming. The applicant will need to work with the City's landscape planner to ensure that the intent of this condition is met. Mr. Blaylock's letter of October 4th noted reasons why berming would not be possible and that the "vertical streetscape" proposed in the submitted plans which shows large street trees was "more important to create a positive image. Staff disagree that the proposed streetscape is adequate to meet the visual screening and softening of the site. Condition No. 9: Regarding Condition No. 9 which required decorative visual buffers a minimum of 15 inches to screen the lower portions of the parked cars, the applicants via the October 4th letter noted that they had proposed an 18 inch screen but stated "However, we believe after discussions with Mr. Jerry Lind that a 24 inch berm could be used that would still allow visibility of the new car dealership and provide the intended streetscape. Some alternatives for designing the berm are attached to this report. The applicants need to work with the City's Landscape Planner in designing a buffer which meets the intent of this condition. Condition No. 10: Regarding Condition No 10 which required a right turn lane on Grady Way to be shown on the plans. The October 4th letter discussion of this item addresses this as if it were a condition of development. The applicants are not required to provide this improvement merely to identify the improvement on the set of plans. '▪ Fred Kaufman, Hear"wig Examine Renton Honda Site Lan, SA-064-88 December 16, 1988 Page 4 OTHER ISSUES Amount of Fill: The applicants' application package indicates that approximately 10, 000 cubic yards of fill material will be placed on the site. Some of this material will the provided through the relocation of existing materials on the site. Storm Drainage Impacts: Storm drainage from the site will be disposed of through the development of a system which releases the storm water into an existing storm line system. This system carries the storm water westward through a series of pipes and ditches to the P-1 Channel. Storm Water Utility staff did not believe development on this site including the placement of additional fill would result in the flooding of nearby properties. Further, flooding of the properties on the south side of S.W. Grady Way was apparently due in part to the flow of storm water to the east. This should no longer be a problem with the construction of the new 48 inch storm line which passes through the Renton Village property by the Renton Cinema, under I-405 and then southwestward past the south portion of the clover leaf and then along the west side of SR 167. City Code requires all new development to provide a storm management system adequate to handle the sites storm drainage. Car Display Areas: A question arose as to whether the 5% landscaping required for large parking lots (10, 000 square feet or more) by Section 4-2204 (6) B (3) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. The opening paragraph on the landscaping of parking lots, Section 4-2204 states "All parking lots, loading areas and drive-in businesses, vehicle sales lot and storage lots except those used for detached single-family dwelling units, duplexes and those in enclosed buildings, shall be landscaped to the standard set forth in Section 4- 744 on Landscaping. " However, Section 4-2208 (2) I states at "The sales area is not a parking lot and does not have to comply with dimensional requirements, landscaping or the bulk storage ordinance requirements for setbacks and screening. Any arrangement of motor vehicles is allowed as long as (1) a minimum five foot (5 ' ) perimeter landscaping area is provided,. (2) they are not displayed in required landscape aareas, and (3) adequate fire access is provided by per Fire Department approval. t• .' .. I `P1 tI ram\ .. V lull i ,. , Ilk ' ll 1::4 0 ll itc . ,. 4 a, ' . . , . . . . . . . ' . •. . . ' . . . . • ac . .. . . • iz.---*.ritt---6------:)(-- . . . „...,...._ .; .,,,,• . 1 • _.......,.. . . ) : • . . . . . . . • . ... ... .. . . • . . alilli , . . . ,.....A....„.,.......„,........ ,. g . . A ,:.1.4 .". .. Csk s., • . . . -,.. • ,.e.. .4 . . '•.. • .....___--- -..4,,444) - - ,. •, . ..., . . . • wok.. 0. ik. . . . . .- • '-',- • . . . . - -- •• ..,,i.c.,.- . . • 1.i • t:1•',. ., ,,,„,1›,.2- „. - . .. . f.., . . • , ,:,,z•-s. ,, ....:„... -.•,tiato, ..,.:, .• . ,-•_-:.1% • • ' " • • •• . ' .....„....1- •• . \.r:. -.., -.....,•,- . , . . . • 'mom , . • . • . .i, , I • i. ,.. • .. . • . • i . .. . • •••...,,..-4,4 . . . . . .. • . . . . Il \ .. . . • . . . , . • • • ; • . . • .1 . . , 1 .• ,.,..• • 1 , • ' •,' AN.:' ' ...' .: . . . ! . . . ., .-• f":4:,0 .1,/: - . . i, . • • 1, . . . ., . • • ,0) ''.1 . \, ) . . • . k ) N,..,. ' . . TA. .1 .. . . . . . . • . . . .. • . . . , . .• I ' . . . , . . ' I . . . .• I . • ' . . . - . . . . -_ ,• - ...- - ir •. r =ir•• • ••• • Pilik• ..% - ...z.... ... —__Y__.P8MIlilikilftminsiiitivomft,..01011110.142°- .11V401111W'e .. - J c , Ai • 4-1 ,.1-Jr:• 4 , 1.... )4 . (.. ,. c .• _ ,c,-. .........,.. _ . January 4, 1989 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: RENTON HONDA (BOB STALP, LANPHERE ENTERPRISES) File No: SA-064-88 LOCATION: Located on the NW corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Site Approval to construct a two story, 34,500 square foot building to house offices, showroom and service bays for a new Honda dealership. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval, with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on November 15, 1988 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on November 22, 1988 at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan Exhibit #3 - Landscape Plan Exhibit #4 - Elevation Plan Exhibit #5 - Full set of Site Plans showing modifications Exhibit #6 - Elevation Plans Exhibit #7 - Letter dated 11/21/88 from Transpo to Roger Blaylock Exhibit #8 - Letter from C.A. Staley to Don Erickson dated 12- 10-88 regarding storm drainage flooding on to her property. Exhibit #9 - Letter of 12/16/88 from Transpo to Roger Blaylock.. Exhibit #10 - Letter from Gary Norris to Roger Blaylock. Exhibit #11 - Supplemental Report to Hearing Examiner from Don Erickson dated 12-16-88. Exhibit #12 - Letter of 12-6-88 from John Adamson to Roger Blaylock. Exhibit #13 - Series of three drawings showing berming dimensions. RENTON HONDA (Bob Stalp, ____sphere Enterprises) SA-064-88 January 4, 1989 Page 2 Exhibit #14 - Maneuvering on-site diagram. Exhibit #15 - Sheet of calculations concerning turning radius on- site. The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by the Zoning Administrator, Don Erickson, which included the following information on this project. This request is to provide for a new automobile dealership to be located on the NW corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue. The site is approximately 4.09 acres and is located in an area considered to be a gateway into the city. He said staff feels this proposal meets the needs of the Comprehensive Plan; the business will be located in the commercial portion of the downtown area; Maple Avenue SW will be used for ingress and egress for the site with a driveway in the middle of the site that will also be used with a right in/right out movement only; and the applicant has agreed to participate in the Grady Way Traffic Improvement Benefit District. The ERC reviewed this proposal and issued a determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated, and set out a list of conditions at that time which included such matters as limiting hauling materials to the site during the construction phase, assurance on keeping the streets clean during construction, erosion control, redesigning access points, concerns addressed about pedestrian linkages between the facility and the street, landscaping and screening, berming, light and glare, buffering. He said the applicant has responded to some of the conditions with letters of understanding, and noted traffic warrants for a signal were not sufficient to require a traffic light but volunteered to participate in the Traffic Benefit District. Additional landscaping will be provided to the north but not on the eastern portion of the site. Mr. Erickson at this point reviewed the criteria to be considered when reviewing a Site Plan and stated the proposal will not provide impacts to surrounding properties and uses, lighting is to be shielded from off-site exposure, landscaping requirements are to be approved by city staff; the Examiner questioned whether or not there is going to be sufficient room on-site for delivery trucks to deliver vehicles and Mr. Erickson felt there would be sufficient room. There is to be low lot coverage on the site; noise will be contained within the buildings; the existing water main on the property will have to be extended and tied in with the Metro line; and a security and alarm system will have to be approved by city departments. Mr. Erickson concluded stating it is not felt this project will have adverse impacts on the neighborhood noting this is a very narrow site and may not lend itself to many other different types of uses at this time. With staff recommendations Erickson asked the Examiner for approval of this proposal. Beginning testimony in support of this proposal and representing the applicant was Roger Blaylock, 10717 N.E. 4th, Suite 9, Bellevue, 98004. Mr. Blaylock noted agreement with the staff report but stated the report does not agree with Exhibit #2 because revised plans had previously been submitted to staff. He submitted a revised set of plans for review and they were entered as Exhibit 5. It was noted for the record that staff had not had an opportunity to review the new set of plans prior to this hearing. Mark Gleason, Architect, 3131 Elliott Avenue, Suite 270, Seattle, 98109 addressed the revisions in the Site Plan. The new site plan included the S.W. Grady improvements and widening and channelization plans; shows pedestrian access on either side of the driveway; on the NW corner there is a ramp off the fire lane that provides access up to the area for vehicle sales display to provide on-site access for the owner/client and could be used later by the fire department. He explained there is a service island under the second story of the building; feels they are providing an aesthetic design; the site is narrow but is narrowed even further by the utility easement under Grady Way; does not feel parking as referred to by staff should be considered as outdoor storage; reviewed proposed contents of the site which include a sales display area, customer parking and car pickup, service department, parking, vehicle display, and access to wash bays. New car delivery is felt to be adequately provided for with the same maneuvering space available as would be required for fire department equipment. The Examiner advised Mr. Gleason that more than likely he is going to make it a condition that all deliveries be made on-site and the applicant will have to determine if the site is adequately designed to accommodate this requirement. Mr. Gleason said three access points have been pulled away from Rainier and Grady Way as much as possible; and Gleason presented a walk-through of the proposed completed building and all the uses and detail aspects of the site as a part of this proposal. Mr. Erickson advised that Grady Way may be widened in the future and if that is the case landscaping used now may be lost at that time. He also reiterated that the applicant has been advised that the visibility they now have may not exist in the future. There is also a powerline easement crossing the site. Speaking again Mr. Blaylock addressed the extension of Maple Ave. S.W. and easements for the water line located under Maple; the powerline and Metro sewer line which add to the strange configuration of the site. He also referred to the intersection of Rainier and Grady Way and past discussions regarding a possible overpass to alleviate traffic; referenced peak hour traffic; hours of operation; landscape RENTON HONDA (Bob Stalp, Enterprises) SA-064-88 January 4, 1989 Page 3 buffers and berming; sidewalks; pedestrian and vehicular circulation on and off the site, and participation in an LID, Caren Staley. Box 3407, Federal Way, Washington 98063 testified as the owner of 108, 114, 118 and 122 S.W. 12th Street, neighbor to this proposal. Her property was changed to MP zoning in 1981 and is recipient to three (3) driveways on Grady Way through a court order. She wanted to find out what impact this proposal would have on those driveways on the city right-of-way in front of her property on Grady Way. She said it is almost impossible to get off Maple Street on to Grady Way. She also questioned the noise to be created on the site not only from vehicles but also the loud speakers. Ms. Staley questioned the berming to be used as there is a drainage problem from Grady Way and stated if the berming is raised the elevation would cause additional flooding on her property on SW 12th Street. She said if that area must be elevated 6 inches then the storm drain should be kept clean by the city at all times to ensure no further flooding of her property. She feels there should be another hearing due to the additional letters and plans submitted at this hearing. She felt staff and citizens deserved additional time to review this proposal. The storm drainage problem is severe enough she wanted the city to monitor same, and again requested a signal be considered for the Maple intersection. Mr. Blaylock referred to the storm drainage problem which he stated resulted from work completed on I-405 and the Renton Village site as well as two major culverts placed on this site years ago by the Public Works Department which he feels will handle the general area and control the water in this area. He considers the project appropriate, of benefit to the city, concurs with staff recommendations and changes, and requested approval. The Hearing Examiner stated here have been a number of letters introduced that have not been responded to and feels this should be done; staff should be permitted to review the new plans submitted; and the concern regarding traffic generation - and with these, and other minor concerns expressed, he wanted to remand this matter back to the ERC for further considerations. A new hearing date was set to further discuss whether the site should be raised another 6 inches, how that would affect the visibility of the site, and storm drainage in the area. Also the Examiner said he would like the Traffic Engineer to address the ITE Manual differences suggested by the applicant and the city, and the traffic warrants for Maple Avenue should be re-addressed to include safety factors that would justify a traffic signal. He said with a private driveway intersecting with a T-intersection at two public streets (one of which is a major arterial) there must be consideration given to more than just the actual numbers of cars and the fact that turns are not facilitated at that intersection. Public Works should address the flooding on 12th and whether or not I-405 improvements and expansion will be capable of handling the problem; and the noise problem created with outdoor loudspeakers should also be addressed. The date for the continued hearing was set for December 20, 1988 at 9:00 A.M. DECEMBER 20, 1988 Jeanette Samek-McKague, Senior Planner, presented a review of the first hearing and clarified where staff and the applicant are presently regarding the topics of concern previously discussed. During the course of this hearing Exhibit Nos. 8 - 15 were entered into the record. During this review clarification regarding certain mitigated conditions was given - namely to condition #1 noting hours of operation for hauling hours; #5 regarding redesign of access points and Traffic Engineering's feeling that signalization will not be necessary at this time at S.W. Grady Way and Maple; fees that will be required of the applicant for the LID; conditions 8 and 9 regarding visual buffers with berms being no more than 18 inches; condition #10 regarding right-turn lanes which are to be shown on the plans and the possible loss of landscaping in that area. Mrs. Samek-McKague continued stating staff has been unable to identify a swale or creek on the property. There is a new storm water line through the site which lies on the south and west sides of highway #167 and ultimately ends up in the P-1 Channel - it appears there is no storm drainage impact from this site. She continued stating the car display area will not be treated as a parking lot thereby making it responsible for additional landscaping as referred to in the Parking and Loading Ordinance as amended in 1984. As to noise concerns from loudspeakers on the property it was suggested the applicant could possibly check into the use of individual pagers. Gary Norris. Traffic Engineer, City of Renton, spoke to some of the traffic concerns previously expressed. Mr. Norris acknowledged concerns of residents along the south side of Grady Way regarding access time during peak hours. He stated the city has proposed, and is in the process of developing an extension from the right turn lane at Lind Avenue SW to Rainier Avenue So., with that lane providing a right only turn onto Highway 167 on free-flow conditions which would remove this maneuver from the traffic signal at the Rainier Avenue and Grady Way intersection. He said he feels this will relieve concerns about accessing Grady Way and Maple Avenue; it is also proposed the intersection of Maple Avenue SW and Grady Way be identified as a signalized intersection - and access to Grady Way for left turns be located between Rainier and Lind Avenue which would restrict all left turn traffic in that corridor. Norris said further that the applicant has verbally agreed to provide undergrounding for a future signal and do the channelization on their portion of Maple Avenue and Grady Way for future left turn pockets, so that at such time when traffic warrants are met installation could proceed. Norris said access on the Maple Avenue extension to the north should be restricted for RENTON HONDA (Bob Stalp, __phere Enterprises) SA-064-88 January 4, 1989 Page 4 approximately 100 ft. to allow adequate storage and protection of the vehicle detection equipment, with the access being either reserved in the form of an easement or dedicated to the city as right-of-way. The Examiner queried if the driveway should be moved rather than restricting movement in that area as suggested, and it was again clarified that warrants at this time do not substantiate a traffic signal at this time, but at such time as development to the south becomes more intense the signal may then be justified. The Examiner commented noting safety should also be a consideration for a signal as well as traffic volumes. Mr. Norris continued noting he had not specifically addressed the maneuverability of large delivery trucks on the site as well as emergency vehicles in the proposed plan and its two driveways as proposed; based upon local traffic studies by the applicant Traffic Engineering concurs with the applicant's trip figure of 28.59 trips/1000 sq. ft. of building for a total of about 988 trips. Based upon that figure, the City Council at their meeting of December 19, 1988 adopted the Grady Way Benefit District and for a use such as this proposal the figure would be $72.00 per trip generated for a total of approximately $71,017.56. Norris commented about the right turn lane at Grady and Rainier stating it was an issue at a previous development proposal for a restaurant, and at that time there were some significant utility constraints on the property to the north that presented a problem in setting up a designated right turn lane. He said there are some very significant plans by the city to reconstruct the Rainier and Grady Way intersection that may not tie into a designated right turn lane at that time but it is felt maybe at this time it is not appropriate to make that demand on the developer. Speaking on behalf of the applicant was Roger Blaylock, The Blaylock Company, 10717 NE Fourth Street, Suite 9, Bellevue. 98004. Mr. Blaylock added additional exhibits to the record and proceeded stating there is no objection to the requirement to underground for future signalization and the Examiner commented on the letter entered as Exhibit #12 and its reference to the term "etc." and what it means. Blaylock said in previous discussions with staff regarding the extension of Maple Avenue to the north noting it was not the intention of the applicant to put in a full street even 100 ft. back into the property (it would be a private street accessing the site) because it would impact the use of a long strip of their property along Rainier Avenue. The building has been pulled to the west to centrally locate it to provide sales on one end and service on the other, with the access on the eastern portion of the property being a right-in, right-out access; over 1/3 of the site there will be no landscaping with only 2-3 ft. extra at the end of the property that could be used for landscaping. The problem is to maintain the 12 ft. of landscaping shown across their site. Responding to the Examiner who asked clarification on the applicant's intention regarding channelization at the potential Maple/Grady Way intersection and the "etc." contained in the letter referencing same - Blaylock stated that was not the understanding of the applicant. He said they can provide the width to provide the necessary lane but had no intention of building the street back into the site. Regarding berming of 24 inches reference was made to code section 4.738.(d)(1)(g) which he feels an auto display area is like a picture window and should not be required to landscape so intensely that the product is not visible - stating 24 inch berming is excessive - if 24" is measured from the parking lot they will lose the visibility of the total car and the site would be useless. He suggested the berm be measured at the display area from the sidewalk using the figure of 15" as discussed by the ERC. A truck maneuvering diagram was presented as well as a diagram referring to calculations for turning radii. As to noise - Blaylock felt there is already strong background noise from the freeway and does not feel this proposal will be an intrusion. He said in many of the city's heavily industrialized areas businesses are using the outdoor paging system. He acknowledged there will be no gasoline maintained on the site; feels this proposal is appropriate, and all concerns have been adequately addressed. He requested approval of the site plan as proposed. Bob Stalp of Lamphere Enterprises, 12505 SW Broadway, Beaverton, Oregon 97005 noted he has 5 dealerships and stated acoustics can be addressed; to be put on an individual pager system would be very costly; the lot is very long and difficult to build on, and feels it is difficult to address all of the problems at this time but they can be worked out in time to the benefit of all concerned. The Examiner asked Mr. Blaylock how the 100 ft. dedication suggested by Traffic Engineering would affect the east/west flow across the first 100 ft. of the site by Maple Avenue. The reply was that access provides the means to maneuver large trucks on site and to access the service areas, parking in front, and if that first 100 ft. were taken the applicant would have no circulation around the building which would be in violation of the fire code. This would put a street through the property and diminish the effectiveness of the operation of the site and such a street would benefit no one which would leave them with a limited strip containing a 15 ft. sewer line easement along the back of the building and 100 ft. of power line easements on the south side limiting the position of the building. At this point there was general discussion on the possibility of no traffic signal at all and the movement of the driveway to the east or west so a full intersection is not created at Maple Avenue. Norris said if that was done then the traffic would have to be restricted to right turns only at that access and wanted to be sure the turning radius for large trucks would be sufficient at the entrance to the site. He concluded referencing other sites in the city where private access roads are provided into the site and are signalized and because this site will have a certain level of traffic and storage equipment he does not feel this requirement will be out of line based on previous site requirements. Mr. Blaylock • RENTON HONDA (Bob Stalp, __ __phere Enterprises) SA-064-88 January 4, 1989 Page 5 concluded stating the redesign for Grady Way included a protected left-turn pocket for people to wait and turn into the site at that location. All testimony was concluded at this time. The Examiner requested an additional week to make the decision in this matter due to the holiday weeks forthcoming. There was no objection. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:20 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: • Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Bob Stalp, Lanphere Enterprises, filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for a car dealership on approximately 4.09 acres. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South, immediately north of the Rainier and I-405 intersection. 6. The subject site was reclassified to its current zoning of B-1 (Business/Commercial) in January, 1981 with the adoption of Ordinance 3499. 7. A short plat was approved in March of 1981. A site plan approved for a restaurant was never utilized and was withdrawn. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 9. The area as described above is immediately north of I-405 and west of Rainier Avenue South. A long, intense commercial strip begins at this corner and runs north along both sides of Rainier. A large variety of retail services are located along this corridor including two larger shopping centers and smaller groupings of smaller retailers. 10. Grady Way generally is less retail oriented, especially west of the subject site where smaller office and industrial parks predominate. East, across Rainier, are a variety of uses including another automobile dealership, a hotel complex, movie theater and shopping center. An anomaly in this area are the remaining single family homes generally located between Grady Way and I-405 immediately south of the subject site. These are older homes which predate the construction of I-405 and the general transition which has occurred in this area over the last 10 to 15 years. 11. The zoning in the area generally mirrors the uses described above. The site and areas to its north and east are zoned B-1. West of the site is an M-P (Manufacturing Park) zone reflecting the office park and industrial uses in these areas. The single family homes along the south side of Grady are included within the M-P district as non-conforming uses. 12. The rear wall of shopping center buildings bounds the subject site along the eastern third of the subject site's northern property line. 13. The applicant proposes establishing a Honda dealership on the corner of Rainier and Grady on what is now three lots. 14. The subject site is approximately 165 feet deep and approximately 1,080 feet long. The site is not a perfect rectangle and is shaped more like an imperfect parallelogram with a section missing at the corner of Grady and Rainier. The longer approximately 1,080 frontage is along Grady, while the shorter frontage is located along Rainier. RENTON HONDA (Bob Stalp, —...i.phere Enterprises) SA-064-88 January 4, 1989 Page 6 15. The easterly third of the site would accommodate a car display area. The middle third would contain the combined sales and parts and service buildings. The buildings are actually connected, or bridged, by a second floor level. The westerly third would contain a parking area. 16. Two driveways will serve the site. The easternmost drive would be approximately 500 feet from the corner of Rainier and Grady and will be limited to right-in/right-out maneuvers. This driveway enters the site and provides access to an aisleway that runs directly north to the portal between the sales and parts/service wings of the building. This portal provides access to the service drop-off area. 17. The second driveway, the westernmost drive, would be approximately 800 to 900 feet east of the Rainier/Grady intersection and approximately 400 feet east of the Lind/Grady intersection. This second driveway would correspond with the northerly extension of Maple Avenue South which forms a "T" intersection with Grady at the location of the second driveway. Maple, which at one time ran north through the site, is a vacated right-of-way. 18. The first floor is divided by the drive-thru area into two separate wings. The service bays and parts wing of the building, approximately 200 foot wide by 70 foot deep, is 14,000 square feet. The sales area/showroom is approximately 5,200 square feet. Capping the drive-thru area and portions of the other two first floor sections is a 13,805 square foot second floor. That portion of the second floor over the sales area will be open through to the first floor creating a vaulted open area two-stories high. 19. The applicant proposes filling and grading the site to bring it up to street grade. In addition, fill materials will be used to create a 10 to 15 foot wide landscaped berm along the east and south margins of the site between the sidewalk and the display and parking areas. The filling will require the importation of approximately 10,000 cubic yards of materials. The applicant agreed to a berm height of 18 inches above the level of the parking and display areas. 20. In addition to the berm, the applicant proposes a "gateway" or entry sign at the southeast corner of the site, displaying a "Welcome to Renton" sign. While the site is not actually near a boundary, it is a major entry point for those exiting I-405 in this location. 21. Additional landscaping will be provided in the western parking lot and minimal plantings are proposed in front of the showroom and near the eastern half of the parts building. To soften the blank wall provided by the rear of the buildings in the adjoining northerly shopping center the applicant proposes a narrow row of taller plantings. No additional interior landscaping has been proposed in the vehicle display area since the code does not appear to require any, although frankly, the provisions speak all around the issue. 22. Intermittent flooding problems have occurred in this vicinity immediately south of Grady Way. Staff reviewed the storm drainage problems in the area and found that the alteration of the subject site - both the grading and filling and the actual construction, will not exacerbate any existing flooding problems south of Grady Way. A new larger storm line installed in conjunction with the I-405 widening project is anticipated to handle any additional storm water. 23. The applicant will store used motor oil on site in conjunction with the service center. The applicant has decided not to install underground gasoline tanks in order to avoid any hazards involved with storing such agents on the site. 24. The site will be served by a complement of 93 parking stalls which will include 2 handicapped stalls. 25. Large vehicle carrier/tractor trailer trucks will deliver new vehicles to the site. The applicant has presented plans which appear to demonstrate that such vehicles can do all maneuvering on the subject site. The Traffic Engineering Division did not have an opportunity to review these plans. 26. Traffic mitigation fees are based upon a figure extrapolated from the ITE Manual and actual vehicle counts in Renton and Bellevue of similar uses. Traffic Engineering has accepted the derived numbers of 28.59 trips per 1,000 square feet of building. Based upon a building of 34,500 square feet, and utilizing the Grady Way District fee o 72.00_per "' the fee totals $71,017.56. These fees were imposed for general traffic improve nt� in the Grady Way vicinity necessitated by the additional traffic generated by the proposed project. 27. These fees are not expected to offset the specific improvements immediately abutting the site necessary to serve this development. Those improvements were also addressed by the ERC which imposed additional conditions related to traffic and transportation. They required that a RENTON HONDA (Bob Stalp, __There Enterprises) • SA-064-88 January 4, 1989 Page 7 right turn lane into the site along Grady be shown on the plans. It is unclear what effect construction of such a lane would have, but loss of landscaping appears inevitable. 28. Traffic Engineering, reviewing a condition imposed by the ERC, has determined that the development of the subject site will not create sufficient warrants to require installation of a signal at Maple and Grady. Traffic Engineering also clarified the ERC determination that the applicant must design the intersection and install the necessary wiring and channelization so they they create an effective and safe left turn pocket for the applicant's westerly driveway. 29. Staff also recommended that the applicant provide an easement in which vehicle detection equipment can be installed. The easement would provide an envelope in which only vehicles prepared to exit the site would be allowed. Any other use of this proposed area by vehicles would create false signals that vehicles were stacked and awaiting a.signal change. The easement would have to be approximately 100 feet deep, thereby cutting more than halfway into the subject site. 30. Staff clarified the time limitations on hauling imposed by the ERC, specifying that the limitations only applied to off-site activities and that on-site activities could proceed during the regular periods. 31. Complaints have been received regarding the use of public address systems by car dealerships in - general, and particularly in this area as used by the dealership across Rainier. Apparently car dealerships habitually utilize paging systems to contact salespeople and service people. These address systems carry off-site spilling intrusive noise into adjacent parcels during operating hours. 32. Staff recommended that the applicant provide decorative sidewalks around the subject site to reflect similar treatment proposed for the theater renovation to the southeast and the new development along Park, north of the central business district. CONCLUSIONS 1. The Site Plan Ordinance provides a number of specific criteria generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air and the absence of disturbing noises; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 2. In addition, proposed site plans must not adversely affect area-wide property values, must provide adequate air and light, and must not cause neighborhood deterioration or blight. This proposal appears to successfully satisfy these additional criteria. 3. The proposed use, an automobile dealership, is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is designated for commercial uses and the dealership qualifies. 4. The proposed use complies with the various setbacks and other requirements of the Zoning Code. The buildings will obviously be constructed in conformance with the Building Code. The elimination of the gasoline storage tanks will simplify the permit processing for the proposed use, although all used oil will have be stored using appropriate technology. 5. The proposed use will provide some mitigation to lessen the impacts on surrounding uses, although more could be accomplished in this regard by limiting the filling of the site and by providing additional landscaping. There seems to be no reason to raise the elevation of the site above the height of the surrounding terrain. Elevating the site and structures would make the RENTON HONDA (Bob Stalp, _.__sphere Enterprises) SA-064-88 January 4, 1989 Page 8 site more prominent, which may serve the applicant's purposes but serves no known land use purpose, especially with the vast amount of display area unbroken by landscaping. 6. Since the applicant has seen fit to take advantage of code provisions (which are vague at best) in regard to landscaping car display areas, at least the impact of this use can be minimized by limiting the scale of any filling. This gateway site (acknowledged by the applicant who has proposed a "gateway" sign) could have a more aesthetic appearance if the corner were not dedicated to car displays but rather to a well designed building. If anything, the proposed use reinforces rather than dilutes the strip development which has been introduced along Rainier. 7. Therefore, the applicant shall re-grade the site in such fashion that the finished floor elevation of the buildings and parking areas shall align with the curbs surrounding the site. The elevation shall be determined by using the elevations of whatever portion of the curb is closest to the area being graded - and where an area is equidistant from two areas of curbing such as the eastern quarter of the site with curbs along both Rainier and Grady, it shall be graded to correspond with the lower of the two elevations. Minor deviations shall be permitted to provide for positive drainage of storm water. 8. The landscaped berm required by the ERC will also assist in mitigating the rather blank sea of cars. The site, therefore, shall be surrounded by a landscaped berm which shall be not less 18 inches in height. The height shall be determined once the elevation of the site and parking areas are established, and the top of any berm shall be at least eighteen (18) inches above the finished elevation of its abutting parking or display area. 9. To assure that there are minimal off-site impacts, the applicant will have to make sure that all maneuvering occurs on the subject site. Grady Way is too important an arterial, and the site is located too close to Rainier Avenue, to permit any possibility of maneuvering on Grady. The applicant's plans were not reviewed by Traffic Engineering since they were submitted at the public hearing, and there was some concern that at least the turning radius was insufficient. Therefore, since the code prohibits maneuvering on the public right-of-way, and since Grady Way is a heavily travelled arterial, the applicant will not be permitted to either unload or maneuver on the right-of-way. If the plans have to be altered, all additional maneuvering room or turning radius space found necessary shall be deducted from the car display areas or building footprints and not from the parking areas, perimeter landscaping or berm, with the exception of minor driveway modifications. 10. Finally, in the area of mitigating impacts on surrounding properties and uses, this office cannot ignore the unfettered use of the public address system to contact the various employees of the dealership. This is obviously a new area of concern but that does not make it unworthy of consideration. This office has had to review a horse manure composting facility, as well as paint plants whose odors could spill over onto adjoining properties, and noise should not be any different. And again, in these matters the violation of odor or noise ordinances was not the issue, it was purely the nuisance aspect of the spillover. The analogy may have to be limited to these odor cases since so far there have been few noise as nuisance matters presented, although it has been peripherally presented at the city airport. 11. The applicant does not have exclusive right to the appropriation of the air on, or surrounding its site. While noise regulations provide for certain minimum standards, land use regulations restrict what may be permitted in a certain area. If car dealerships require amplification/paging/public address systems which spill noise off their respective sites and disturb neighboring uses then it may be that they should be located in an industrial zone. As a matter of fact the applicant's only reference was to the common use of pagers on industrial sites. Merely because the public address systems may meet statutory noise limitations does not in and of itself demonstrate that the use of those systems is permissible. It's obvious that the systems are disturbing since it was specifically mentioned, probably as a result of the disturbance created by the dealership across Rainier. While the issue may not have been considered sufficiently in the past, that oversight does not require that it be further ignored. The paging system is more than likely archaic, and its use is certainly inconsiderate. Few other private users usurp open air for purely private purposes. If the applicant wishes to be located in a high visibility, high quality commercial area then limitations on the unaesthetic qualities of its business are necessary, including limitations on the use of a public address system. There does not seem to be any overriding need to use such a system. Phone messages can be taken and the site is not so very large that someone could not hand carry a message if it were that important. Therefore, the applicant shall not use any outdoor public address system. 12. The site is very constrained. It is clear that the applicant is attempting to shoehorn in too much on too limited a site. Obviously this site has incredible visibility but it is also located in an area of increasing traffic congestion. Not only that, but the site is rather long and narrow, and it also straddles and blocks the normal course of Maple Avenue creating an awkward "T" RENTON HONDA (Bob Stalp, _____phere Enterprises) SA-064-88 January 4, 1989 Page 9 intersection which may need a vehicle actuated signal light in the future. The problem with the eventual installation is that there may not be the appropriate queuing distances and clearances. 13. Staff has suggested that an aisle approximately 100 feet deep be set aside to assure that signal activation is not set off by on-site traffic circulation. This requirement would inappropriately intrude more than halfway into the site and severely restrict on-site circulation. At the same time, the safety of the Grady Way arterial must be preserved. Therefore, to assure the continued safe functioning of Grady Way, staff, at its sole discretion, may restrict at any time the left turn maneuver from the site onto Grady from the westerly driveway and limit that driveway to right-in/right-out, or require its closure or relocation. 14. Property values in the area should not be adversely affected by the development of the subject site as proposed by the applicant and as conditioned by both the ERC and this office. 15. Circulation on the site appears adequate, and again these issues were considered in some of the discussion above. Maneuvering shall occur on the site and access restrictions may be imposed if the safety of vehicles along Grady Way is at any time jeopardized by this development. 16. The low-rise nature of the building and its general separation from adjoining uses should permit the passage of adequate light and air to the site and surrounding uses. 17. Additional (although limited) landscaping will screen the rear of the shopping center buildings located immediately north of the site. Small plantings will also be placed in front of the building. The incorporation of a gateway sign is a nice addition to the site but its design should be coordinated with other similar signs proposed around the city. Any incorporation of decorative sidewalks to soften the impacts of the site should be left to the applicants discretion, although if installed they should be subject to approval by the city. 18. Adequate public services serve the site and the new storm line under I-405 should adequately serve the storm water collection needs of this area. 19. While this office believes that a more aesthetic use could have been found for this prominent site, all in all, the redevelopment of this corner with the landscaping, berm, and traffic mitigation measures imposed by the city and provided by the applicant will serve the public use and.interest. DECISION The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall re-grade the site in such fashion that the finished floor elevation of the buildings and parking and vehicle display areas shall align with the curbs surrounding the site. The elevation shall be determined by using the elevations of whatever portion of the curb is closest to the area being graded and where an area is equidistant from two areas of curbing such as the eastern quarter of the site, where curbs exist or will be constructed along both Rainier and Grady, it shall be graded to correspond with the lower of the two elevations. Minor deviations shall be permitted to provide for positive drainage of storm water. 2. The site shall be surrounded by a landscaped berm which shall be not less than 18 inches in height. The berm height shall be determined once the elevation of the site and parking and display areas are established - and the top of any berm shall be at least eighteen (18). inches above the finished elevation of its abutting parking or display area. 3. If the plans have to be altered to assure that all delivery truck, and other maneuvering occurs on the subject site, all additional maneuvering room or turning radius space found necessary shall be deducted from the car display areas or building footprints and not from the parking areas, perimeter landscaping or berm, with the exception of minor driveway modifications which may affect the berm. 4. All used oil, solvents, and other similar chemicals and agents shall be stored using 4e appropriate technology and subject to the approval of the city's Hazardous Materials �AV Inspector. fee'k 5. The applicant shall not use any outdoor public address system. 6. The city, at its sole discretion, may restrict at any time the left turn maneuver from the site onto Grady Way from the westerly driveway, and limit that driveway to right- in/right-out - or require that driveway's closure or relocation. RENTON HONDA (Bob Stalp, phere Enterprises) SA-064-88 January 4, 1989 Page 10 7. The easterly driveway shall be limited to right-in/right-out turning movements only. 8. The gateway sign shall be coordinated with other similar signs proposed around the city, and is subject to the approval of the city. 9. Any incorporation of decorative sidewalks to soften the impacts of the site should be left to the applicant's discretion, although, if installed, the materials shall be subject to approval by the city. 10. The applicant shall design the intersection and install the necessary wiring and channelization at Maple Avenue. ORDERED THIS 4th day of January, 1989. FRED J. KA MAN HEARING E AMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 4th day of January, 1989 to the parties of record: Roger Blaylock Blaylock Company 10717 NE 4th, Suite 9 Bellevue, WA 98004 Mark Gleason, Architect 3131 Elliott Avenue, Suite 270 Seattle, WA 98109 Caren Staley Box 3407 Federal Way, WA 98063 Gary Norris Traffic Engineer City of Renton Bob Stalp Bob Lanphere Enterprises 12505 SW Broadway Beaverton, Oregon 97005 TRANSMITTED THIS 4th day of January, 1989 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Don Monaghan, Acting Engineering Supervisor Members, Renton Planning Commission Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney John Adamson, Developmental Program Coordinator Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Valley Daily News . Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. January 18. 1989. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may RENTON HONDA (Bob Stalp, sphere Enterprises) --. SA-064-88 January 4, 1989 Page 11 not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. 1 `t . • • 4.. ♦ . .-. j'lrc. 01. 1. D"�-Ire q" '�� 1,giftI•�,_.. \ I FPUDD� 84 = L. . __FOVD-0371- , -B 1$ • �- O S.N. 7' • ST iiI .� i it. , , L ,' • mI •3 _ if I I i �a�0 I:. / 'I. ... • .. IL...---' . --- . ° I d, II1 II. I; . 411111111161'.111 L_.-- .. - c _______— c., _11...,,„,5, �F R1110-,.1!lj 00000.hogg) \. ' 10 IIIUIl III P I IIIIIIiI!'"_-- �' - &AP° �.IIIIII-.',; 0IUi ] I..,,-�ti1'E i1 .��I�, ( . 0011111 rrT77-friTV, .4 rail i'' . -'- fr.1il�ln�'{IIII ` , =_= - ice — 111111111111 ___,--.- - _ - . c Min. ''',.. 1 7: 1k I ill 17;77---=1- 7 ---E- 4- -1 7.:: :.milimma .J_ . m. N , \ , ,:.46i. 10 i tr_.- 1111111"1" Nis, t-- Wrik ..s —_ //'. --7, C3- ..- ‘.s .t .7 .11, ''"-zo �1�i `AIL III elli�v _ _ — :,::::, - -- _ .tom I I I I I / ,, 71 !i I ,L.i IIIJI.W / .� r - ee� =a--=- iIIIII > - it• = � , -- - n a Q r., — - . - -bra • to I .. �4011,„ . 9-, . RENTON HONDA . • . 4/ . • SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-064-88 NI • APPLICANT BOB STALP (LANPHERE ENTERPRISES) TOTAL AREA 4.09 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS . S.W. GRADY WAY . EXISTING ZONING B-1, BUSINESS USE ' • EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED . ' . PROPOSED USE NEW CAR DEALERSHIP . • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMERCIAL COMMENTS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF. RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH AND S.W. GRADY WAY. • I0. • . "vl • , CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-064-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-064-88 PROPONENT: Lanphere Enterprises DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval for a new Honda automobile dealership with construction of a two story building of steel and glass, approximately 34 , 500 sq. ft. in size, which will house offices, showroom, and service bays. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property is located at the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probably significant adverse impact on the environmental. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminay site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditionsare necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from September 20, 1988 . Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. , October 4 , 1988 , in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official; Environmental Review Committee Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: September 19 , 1988 DATE OF DECISION: September 14 , 1988 w' SIGNATURES: 'Ronald G: Nelson Larry Springer Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director • Richard C Houghton Public Works Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-064-88 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-064-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval for a new Honda automobile dealership with construction of a two story building of steel and glass, approximately 34,500 sq. ft. in size, which will house offices, showroom, and service bays. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the ERC issue a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated- with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant shall be required to limit off-site hauling by construction vehicles to the hours between 8: 30 AM and 3 : 30 PM Monday through Friday. 2 . That the applicant shall be required to provide wheel washing for all trucks before those vehicles enter the roadway from the construction site in order to minimize tracking of dust and debris from the site. lip . erm,ination of Non-Signif4 -- Ice-Mitigated Ltigdtion Measures mton Honda Site Plan Approval ige 2 3 . That the applicant shall provide a bond in the amount of $2 , 000.00 for street cleaning. 4 . That the applicant shall develop a plan for erosion control subject to approval by the Public Works Department, to protect the subject parcel and surrounding properties from damage resulting from erosion of the site during construction operations. 5. That the applicant shall provide a revised plan, redesigning and relocating access points to the site via Grady Way, including, but ' not limited to, coordination of access points, signalization, creation of right-in/right-out routings. These improvements should be subject to approval by the Police Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Design Engineering Division, and Traffic Engineering Divisions of the City of Renton. 6. That the applicant shall provide a revised plan which includes pedestrian linkages from the site to the sidewalks surrounding the site, and to adjacent properties. 7 . That the applicant shall provide a plan for controlling exterior lighting to ensure that glare is directed away from adjacent properties and public rights-of- way. 8 . That the applicant shall provide bermed lawn areas between the street curb and sidewalk areas to visually soften the site and provide a protection buffer between motorists and pedestrians. termination of Non-Siynif?'Inn e-Mitigated tigation Measures nton Honda Site Plan Approvai ge 3 9 . That all parking areas adjacent or near to street property lines shall have decorative visual buffers to screen the lower portions of parked cars. (Note: a minimum of 15" high decorative screen is suggested. ) 10. That the applicant designate the right turn lane on Grady Way on the site plan approval. mmdoc ;.:, . THEB3I.. y'LJck .� -COMPANY pk specuilists in land-usi,prc,cedu,tc ;z :p CITY 19F UNION ri • November 4, 1988 f .1.5 NOV4 : 198a BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Mr. Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Department of Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Traffic Mitigation/Renton Honda • Dear Gary: • • - Thank you for meeting with Mr. Bob Lanphere, Mr. Bob Stalp, Mr. Duane Christie, and me on Monday afternoon to discuss and clarify the position of Traffic Engineering Division concerning traffic mitigation. ' • It is our understanding that the following is the present position of the City: . 1. A signal warrant analysis must be completed for the intersection of SW Grady Way and Maple Avenue SW. to determine if a traffic signal is warranted at this time. (I contacted TRANSPO Tuesday morning to authorize them to conduct the street warrant analysis . Their preliminary response on Thursday was that the signal was not warranted because of the low traffic counts on Maple Avenue S .W. A separate letter will be directed to you for the official file from the TRANSPO GROUP. ) 2. Based upon the above conclusion reached by TRANSPO the issue of Lanphere Enterprises installing the traffic signal at this time and subsequently the Traffic Engineering Division supporting our request' for a latecomers ' agreement to the City Council becomes a moot issue . 3. We will participate in the Grady Way Traffic Benefit Area at the time of occupancy. • It is our understanding that your original estimate of $197 per vehicle trip will probably be modified to approximately $65 based on the pending Benefit District Study before the City Council . The form of the payment can either be a bond, • letter of credit, or cash. This will be decided „• prior to occupancy. 10717 NE Fourth Street,Suite 9 • • Bell,-vue,.Washington 9AUU•a • (2mro-155-I550 Gary Norris Renton Honda Site Plan November 4, 1988 Page 2 4. The estimate of traffic generation presented by TRANSPO in the original application has been accepted by the Traffic Engineering Division and for purposes of the cost participation we will use the figure of 962 average daily trips. 5. Lanphere Enterprises will pay the estimated cost of $2 , 080 to upgrade the street lighting level on S.W. Grady Way. 6. ` The site plan .will be modified to provide 30 foot wide driveways instead of 24 feet shown on the original plans . % ) . 7 . The project will not impact either the intersection at S .W. Grady Way & Powell Ave.. S .W. or S.W.7th Street & Hardie Ave. S .W. ; therefore we would not be involved in the present latecomers agreements with Holvick de Regt Koering. If the above points do not clearly address your understanding of the present agreement, I would appreciate an immediate response by Wednesday, November 9 , 1988 . The Community Development Department will be preparing the staff report for the public hearing before the Hearing Examiner on November 22, 1988 . Sincerely, Roger(----- ) (:) , %if41.\/4-k . latipIt., - Blaylock cc. won Erickson Bob Lanphere Bob Stalp Gene Horbach Curt Beattie REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI .IN : TRAFFIC ENGINEERING . I ( APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED See attachment. • • .1 ' 1r DATE: 9-19-88 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZEb REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 1. Provide traffic impact analysis. Include the following information: Form 182 a) Trip generation impact on adjacent streets and intersections b) Trip generation through the following specific intersections: 1) SW Grady Way & Powell Ave. SW 2) SW 7th Street & Hardie Ave. SW c) Traffic signal warrant analysis for Grady Way & Maple Ave. SW. 2. Developer to participate in cost for traffic signal installation at the above two intersections per latecomer's agreement (Holvick de Regt Koering) . Cost of participation will be determined after the trip generation impact is known as requested in item (1) above. 3. Developer to provide a proposed traffic channelization plan for SW Grady Way from Rainier Ave. to Lind Ave. SW. The -plan should include left turn pockets for SW Grady Way to Maple Ave. SW and a center lane two-way left-turn at the driveway between Maple & Rainier Ave. If space is not available for two-way left-turn channelization, then a restrictive turning movement channelization must be provided on Grady Way for the driveway. Note: Channelization plan to be coordinated with City widening plan for Grady Way. 4. Developer to participate in cost of upgrading the street lighting level on Grady Way. Cost is as follows: eight street light units at $260.00 each. 8 x $260.00 = $2,080.00 5. Driveway width to be 30 feet, not 24 feet as shown. 6. Developer to participate in the North Renton Benefit District at the rate of $197.00 per trip generated. The cost will be determined after the traffic impact analysis is reviewed. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISI"" ; �//a�'�f/ �� O� C'C! APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED ah fcc n ',I rodeo cuee( A 712k'e �GI�7 &CCou�I t kM °/C 71r146 • g1 a„,< /-"gfr c /kef « 6 th(/ Si p' ye ,f67 Ceef o n the ("/ a/fecL IGNATU DIR CTOR OR AUTHORIZED DATE;. e �7 �� ... REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Ei APPROVED APPROVED WITH -CD( I ITIONS © NOT APPROVED l m ✓ice_ p ` z 2_ k 3 47" oar ,g e . 7 L56Zhr=---- IGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVDATE: • REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : PLANK( IV DiuisiotJ. ( APPROVED t APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED J L,,,,,psc a D I 'Aar PA.R.kwG 1_07 ARI I \few) SPARSt_ Aship SHOULD ix LIWOSCAtb w -ritEE 0 �1'I °morn t.._E1U.).4 S h1OlLO [ :: A m I►.11 rh r•-, 2. 1' iN r5ovE � TN1F D t S PL ton 1 R., PINK K IKR, Gar Ark1 J t ppc.lc T rS FYkYD 'tt tt car,rr, c*O rV U S Rout- m 1NCLUO D w ritt iki This S fit► N_ DATE: c1_ ,_e ? SIGNATURE OQDIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • : VIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIC, /4./Ty 44/G/n, F,e//VG n APPROVED . APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED 8zQ4o79o©/ L oTs /, 2 frr 3 I.�, /r 51'#/moo-6O AF' [UTILITY APPROVAL SUO i 3 f 1'J Pi?1.CA6 LATE COMERS AGREEMEi:T i I 5 , _ j yam. ,.� W-Co/�To L;/pz�3q,es,�/ 45'452.42 - LATE COMERS AGREEMENT T '• 1..�.Q� I . SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT Ci:':' r 2.7�:i y�5 gC..* sQ Er•k/76a.Ug,c = $'7/% 72 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT f:::_ _ :..t y,� 1.04/sa f7ix i74 26.ed= #7,/30. '1 fae.'444 31°7'5 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT A:: 1 .:•::2Y.-UATER A/0 �� 2(j/. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT A,:r: ; '�. -SE};rR A/p 44 APPROVED WATER PM /,ES - W�. � S �� "A,�s 4PP�;EZ'dL•D SEWER.PIl:Ei y,ES � CZ..Kau Ll'L�t u . IF 'ROVED FIRE HYDRANT Willi0i'i BY FIRE D'?T. y, S h't'a- �'`�`"`�� . �Ir.' '.'' -1 A:i 1YSIS AT: � � a' , e� U L . � C�,�-� ,�it,,.G,- tits� .�. �Ata AiicE/ 7'- "4'`' DATE. X? 2S Ay IGNATURE OF DI ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • F-Z��WA,G,y4 • REVISION 5/1982 Fnrm 1R2 EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIV SION ; lk r i K6N.. 1 I APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS • • El NOT APPROVED ly development andlor construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- Inces. • second means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roadsllanes shall be paved inimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6 . Yes No a �� is reliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of m each squired. hydrants with a minimum flow of / 'v- gP required. /�o� feet of the structure. rimaryhydrant is required to be within feet of the econdary hydrants are required to be within Jaa" tructure. n approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes _No_ _-.. kll fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes._-._ MI fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes No_ DATE: /7, /7/ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Fnrm 1R2 ZEVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : I 1(-4"--lr • vViln APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED r °tvillf1471-4- '-'CA)- L 0_,--Yfrur Ply-L-N34' i2' , • /u�_'> DATE; - >IGNATUR 0 DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE I I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDU ) ERC DATE : 1 ENGINEERING DIVISION FlTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ❑ UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ❑ FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ❑ PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT q BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT F-1 POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : )MMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ( 5: 00 P .M. ON AUGUST 11 1988 , :VIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : &) e •1) RAPPROVED ' APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS EINOT APPROVED ?7GcS I l77 r-7 IJ Lk IL U i. i.t_ c� Co ID C--�', • .2 Jr'Co�2z , ( l`1-c., DATE: F� .GNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Z�^�� REVISION 5/1982 Fnrm 1 fl 7. /IEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 11511Ce_. t3/APPROVED EAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED ti , NA RE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE N. •..o .w emu.. -..: -^ -.**.sr. .**.s F'/L illy ow.x o 1 D u I V..M e 1 u.y I j itinagraerit) IID11S9A',yV -- ��— 7i1 "°^� 133HS �'ais9�"-a14�eS�. av_db4�.d�a,{�tir�+,-'d'a 3f9ii8 �IHD ..A H 3 A o 0 f�.j� 'i:• P ' :�_ ;.�, „ ,4a'• •rn-.1 anW�i' r.14"u�S• cw . - 5 T�-� a� a.��C7�]SSBi19 • 0 ". • - :.?.r ,•ias, 'lid • 'I '2?`'•r.•'ll...: _1��•. t pl., Pih ha ',1qafii o s«,� • • • • • • • • • • • PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON J D tNN O ry 2I1 4 1119988� LS © 15 U 15 -1 7 711.1, -..1 • =l:m, • :a. • . _ 1• ..a Sez®..a.,r• arras.a.ar. exii 01 Iwme a+.rr-..s Erer.0..f .PRIDoDuse u,'�a.Y s.._ a�..v i.wir.Y ` Suff--`�'r 41 ° -431 r. )� T•+ra�a LR.Mo IilSl•.rIA?rm FERUIRCI At�. I ��-s ci • • „I I I f•I'I ar�aJ.�L ' /� I I`I'I I Parts an0 SRrvica ail r Sabe `. . . m . Pn+`..Tr � _ f .IrT 110•O Pi/ • • //^/(f n�srr en sss ...�. r^.r. r r r,1 .6I .I•la.I.I.Irl r.I�J (• 1 �J /90r= l frJ rO • \ / ata.c aaOtTY/1 / / I II��.� I G4R"SVFS'CiSM`( Irwin.ae "Y� h I t ..I I I I I I I I / I'd I• .I I t "L _ u : wjn I ! r • . , ., QL'-----�— —II ar.'w«o,"Ism.- . 1 I a \_ w w.ca r <,+Ern..�"" I.. i..l l.rw� � ,a,ar / m f^�3 ° l' YI°ar+n R. Yn { ../...-. ....L.°u�..d�nam rr447c� .. .Ed...^-•-, I .-- �...K..Iv.•.r _ - �a� I�.....an i- o„ fri m vQ.1 �:o -WI !% i --•-m�I u�yu.0.PCPLAY tt f" J _•/ up s tz.WI // Q r' Z. l a� ��'-�d 1 =_=� \ • �1 /fig. /1�vFY. —7 ." 1 ti- I D �r— —uA�'w"'.-rl.+ —_r� — — a..a ��}' --�, lea,w..•.a_. J• I �� .. ��.._.,, SW Grady MfaY� r s ^�: 7 • -- [ Fe; 9 • \� / _ „0 1 I 1 I I 1 ..,_;, Site Plan \' • KEY r...a I .M•.O. ED L .. in ( a em o.eror(Is aro)uo•e. [ry- y 7- -Mawr!,... t �, • a o o, — �i t. 11`` c.o.aa,..y r— I V' rn a...luaa) x . Ii ' ✓<', U ([ ` �.nr roar ~ RI; Q jII W C•'M • n'-d I a�o_ • • Tn ar 7 a•aa 1t `W' Site Section A-A I F ar N L=tiJ �v �` I Site Statistics V .......- BULGING USE TYPE • A �•a9� n•AUTO.Area �� U - OTEL C. I.I.aM S.r Ma r CI=oum mRat nr.0m>,usr. a. H >...rYap man maYad CT • Q n R-RETAIL �� _ _ _ ; L-COYYEROIAL - 0. TM Evclm�=Forma la lee Oa mr.rt=wr u a.=Mr= D. C 0-OFFICE BLDG. L i a Y: L.Tr+w i,d,a F Mac.ca.,rc t=r a. .x�mina•••a� a.ar.n s� O , li 1 f f.� Q �� I -_J ^ A eara49 la mlfrr Y:ra IRS c...run Mama Milt . amac ,�}1 ��`_ -�C Oa-OUTDOOR STORAGE n �Mo .Y..... _ I rk y.�l.-- 0-DUPLEX . .•Sna lma� ® r W i; fR� .A 0 I t gdo F•�e.ru=VC taw m M.Mat Lim a r.we rare uJ ro T 0 {MOLE FAY.T RE.DEYtt I J �,aG T..aaa I.rm u,Y»p...�..m aew d m`""r.'" oo.N•truGIL .�a.rd • '�' W i 1,..... IRaw.Ma.aa..ae y �� m Nmra r ISIYm Ma ali 100 tam .Um r asor .uu m. a { E D.- '�-..{I o CZ)(� y. / • m .aloe al ra IY...aum•[RCN e..c a ins m..elr. ri 19 Q, ! '' - W. r�M.,ova YavTe rulrT nl+a my: • or®Tr. vw� a...�.r ! . Z O • I �D-" N ro Jag L.a eV Jau Ma Marto sa•=====lt lar r �i z Dwnm m m urs ay ty 1/1•aM�a Iratd alt.rarw.a FA1 Q _ Z • TDm O Grao�:i U®® ¢ r .�,n•n•n• ..,a.ma r Wausau.r r 6 a. ..•. rw,f a r �• o ..m a• rr,.WrAr,al:r la.mM.vmla.r ^Wf w f � �7I I Q - aaar�.r. la�.rr mi rA.am i,:n w e.`�'.�` (• � r r y,L, ~ - L dr ° l.araw b'Wlm,.mr°'it Rani e. raa.a�...a aa..a. I. .... �,. v� �� _ ,T,• o ., mw r�r..e ,r a:R.1..........4 LL -�--a M (Cl, am — 1I /11= 1,o t -�.nl,��„ �.era.ar.� a..._a .:..._....... — .. rr nrIrl•O alas.Je aam Um,•ar..r at um al Oamo/aLt Vicinity M a P "`m On Ta: rm.. . • '®a Y�m `� ' A-1 .s ,..yM• mans u Ma m.ar r u,..a..r,..aam. a..rr..a.= ; — :, ,, jj .1 ,--I886T b T AON a NOirnj d0 A.LIO NOiSli c i t)1';I14I`JV1d • •-n . iT-1-* . -, • r o o 1 • I wy . coo co , P. co g m , R 1 , I kis. , I 1 I • I. 1 1 1 = . • x � ____--______^--I . ..T 0 li i 1.--43,--. -......-.... ...--. ..---,-49...-i-..— ..-..—. -._7—..-..-.0 . 1_ at—ak r-- It —_ .g — t -- _ — — — — — — — — —— —�. 1 4 — • 1 . .a- — 4 '"------ I . i I . " ii 1 • . ,T- ,I mu; I. il , . ' • V rl '',, l'' r .. - . : .A, -.1-11,01 A i l, _ 47,,,t,,N, 1 . .,...„... . ..• .,.., : . ....... .. . :• .:., ,. - o . . 0 ?R lb r. • 1 • ., • • ..... •••• .•• •:• .. , . :• • .• , . „ ., , ,.... .. ,L , 1 'nib c oII P I CI • 1 1 /P 1 — — r—r-- — 'II— t-7. — — 1 P-8 ' — A I - -— -- ----- - 9 — o 1 li • • .1),\P •, 1ED . • Lotit-t!otewutlw&wSii4aiiiii.i in1TG !t'avirgkAa_._ Q ,i�"r�riz�a�a:ss�4�'z rv44 g� Qi:A¢Atk FIRST FLOOR PLAN ') u.1•DD — a mci121i N I �a s, s I .a. : n.w�rt¢oa. R Zoo e_e oo ....... —. • I,_----II•a.u a -_�(:.a 1 n V[a n-._— ___—_.... _.. ..—.1 ..._ I Circe W+�MVc�wL .,I ft. , . • • .:. , .A...L:,:.'; .: '';..: .::.'?. 1.1,:i. :.;• •1.i.L.' : ...i ..!..::':,:•. . •, If 51 11.11 886T 17 I A ON 0 NOltd8 dO ADO NOISlitiU ONINNIrld i ------------------------___ • 1 A w cR a • m '6 R. J 0 I Hill 1 = • 2 El r (-1 1 Irmo 3• • ' 1 t f. ] 11111 .- , 1 , d I I , 1 ....way' -1..„ • { 1 7 ,V , , 1! , 7 I ? I ; 1 1 1 L I '61-ite-tfilibelittririlifirtiiirrglii id at.r.-t'zL';'---144.1.iirMiwArgarrittarts`usult-4=4.Tawaitilimajd( SECOND FLOOR PLAN ) r. 8 I.db !CI 2) 1 I MI ME 3 1 7"'s - .0..'-.'7• i 1 , ITM i r--•14.0.1...6(..d4..,/p.c.occa4,1 cr.cow..,...7....P • / r7-7--D---.. r 1 , ‘ , , 1 / - ,--.......•••._._, kl, Diii-r7i . 1 i 1 1 , 1 I i Ili I li , ; 1 ii I LEE= ,. • ;:x 1;.-1--:), i I . --4 I 1- p_.! -,,.. .. 1 . • :-I , in 1 . • -:- ! i : 1 _ . 1 ' ••••••••.,..e...4.8. • • .---- -- - - • — • I.;- .. I 1 I D ILL i I-I 'V V•••••••••i........• I ••.; . . ,.._ 1:___ I __ , , i 0 4.i.Cik.1:11.0 ,....//, '... :.'- '—' r E r I I ba _ . , ,_, -_-•---,• 11 _—"-'---". ----- -- 41 _ N P.",tr--C, .A . partial South Elevation 1• .'i . 'f' • 'IS .. /--1.0..••••rtr.o..2 1.1%J 1.7 . ....” m I . • 1 1 -, .• I 1 I :', . z . .. , , . -..— J ,. : .— -7••••'; li a 1 I i • re- ., :__7.__EH I Ell j .• - In ZI I 1 . I - 1 JE ? — , t I 1 4i 7 . E.1- FT 7 , 7 7 I LI 4.... _... ,,. -..„... 1(11 -...ki. •partial South Elevation East Elevation. , ;0 ,.......1 — / .......... /,-.-- P.a.! ./---.....44•••••...C.11411%.; --••I'l. / F-7 — nini •-, . — I . 0 z CI ri El D MODDEJ. .._ '. __ - ,- -71 I:I 0 El 1:1 El , i i I . ElEDOCIOnFIDDF/ • . ,:E! ...I I p:1 ... Cli - DODO (...... Pesscar ....9••• .. n _ •. F.: ......1 1 .ax _-:• 4.31-,•"..:! West Elevation partial North Elevation 'till 'f 1 - / ., -.,....! ,.j G-3 ',4•11 w 0;: m t7) = El D CI I:1 1=E El \1\=ILiDEICICID El _,c•f5 -El - • -, cc, =-&—) im co = -g r__, 0 ifin- . to T ii!...41(11 1 • 4 WI'--- ,...., - partial North Elevation , ia 1 A-4 • , a 1 . . . - - 1 I] Ili 1 ,41'...1 Li , i I] 896T V I A ON Q NOIN311J01.1.13 NOISIAla ONINNV1d .• • • --- - _ % .i•:- S..1.> —-- - — 0[1H : oo 0 ____________„, I 4 U Willi 4 y) , — .. — 11 15 . •— —1 _-------- ..------------. — — --------------14.4** / 1:7 1"IP P 'Mil P6 lI — " I. I .. 1)ii; 11 qrli fi i ! . Il .f, -/ d 1 II • Phi li s 'IP 1 J id 33 g il l , a . q 3 1 1 0 r A x 1 1 ..: I 4i9.•• a I di i — t E---. , -0 MI -4 L .. r- q . . ). 1 i ... :,. F. , II ..1-'.. ---- ---1 . --, — I ii.A. I \..,,...- / — _ . :-.. I " iq -a ( . Ini 0Ig i Iiii/iv iv 0 I 1 iii f: if u li , m i I kiiiii -,; 1.1i1 tie i —1 0 1 i WO i: .1IF 1 i i : P-- 1 1 cn ri i, ' w Pt.-.• % 4 1 IFI ril . ..., ill•,. ni •^3 I 2 R • P I i I.' 31 a . . 1 4%43 AdON 111 1 'RI 3 . • . ,... : 0 . et..) A.,,2i , '.: ' • (' \A• II I i k= 1 \ 2 ft4,N,E0 ,i • .:---1-...,0„, ..,.., • _,. -ve sour?, ai----azthiaLdattiarid4iiktuala 1... ( LANDSCAPE PLAN ) '-'"vile& '" I lrEaS.1 1 I "......""'''' ---:•m,..u 1 m.1:4::n m,••.•., III!cr. - -.., 1_ • MP .._ ter: a� 'e"_W Ono m..••re,e••••••••+,,..».••[..al •.mow�..•wWlr.tea•aYYw+Yo...•t t, �!'i' � �( .7........d. �'li -�r i ,17.,,, 14 ....k,.., 45. <m Wa "_ 550•MU OM n•IOW• •.n1. •av:••11�• aw SLY ."1.•,�'a.+ n. ` } f i�'� K .:�,. II --••eel.. IY •Y...•4 •... 11. ....,. w..1.• W, D 1• ••••O..•a.•- •a OCR.4w•. 1 1•'a ..1a • 4v WY la.•..a,w .®..YY R[•. me..,. fr•` %'G •ffl•tr.'9•I •—� .��rtn1..- -� S. • ..., 7 0 • • Y. on••»• • R 1...--i:.u�a me.•a'u'O a%.•••.n...••UP w[R•4n1 rr. 1r'a� - IfAil u. wY Y• In o•4 » _.,.n .•••_n•••a.n1n 4a•R• _. _a` ;�.•nOP ••1134312 „ ._. n W��:.�.n.. -� • ..4n.,K [..•..n..w.aan.1.. iY— No L }1. I A111 : ' c: a ••••n fn. w.-.a• 1 I W w••a M•1••-MM.."" } �i tra+ 1 • . • • nw•w.w +. W.•Y•® 1 .�. .'... ••••Wa Y•4•••••••r•11-a.MM.a'••". SITE LOCATION MAP Li a... �•n me• X ••.•••YY•••, • Y.A.11.» •Y''' ic.�a .n.o• ,Ali •Y11<PC • P 11 Y. 4n•W Y •a•.a1•1. [.•..4a.Om TOOT w• ,w••w.[. • a1 ' WO 4 4, •M.Y tl�+ J 1 as a•.. w. [I.a w. Y• ; . �[. •..•.a n o nw O. 4 ••.4 TM•••n men w r a.e.�•..a•. `yt' .�R v. �--.IW•... w. a.» w.WJI •ems":+•410. 1ar•'nn PM Y menu MO �— MOT Yw O. wrtY••me•wme• a•.4a •••.w KRUM MT• .••1n • me�»•1 OEM, .. MOTr M.II.Y ._..n.Y a.•.11.•1 M▪. •mef•••••••• a r[ .6M/•••• a. .•1•Al, w. ;A. • •rtw • MOON••••••• NM YYWR w HA 1aa•a 1 • _•. • Wpm�• 0•R al•Imes.Y••.••Y• • •J. .0 RIM 0-414•a al. meme Ma a 1••••ca. . V a .••G•.••.•. A' i \ ♦ n.n•w • •••a MU n ••.••u.•aa. • '�ovum••a••a.a. .a. i O w as • r.a • Y. •••r uc...•. a. •r 4w.••1• • _ Y. u••a.r a...•ae. E[ •o•r•u MOIL • n. l•••...1. Y. RPM•.a1.OUP '- • V 11.. • 7 . ; i . i e, • bow • Z i.e 1 a • A. �/. / // tion n. tf $ / �, n!J/ rl co' o' d• 1I °• •< MOW eo•»••• Sr•LL SHOOS BUILDING 8I�Q+ /a • --P^•` i /7/ -.„„e •[ c "[ •••4••••••••••.. f ,�N,0 /y/L •... O..>.. • ... <».�.mN.a.. /r /+�. dY, a R SW LOTH ST•y••: , , a r f T ..�• e4. Pa Cl' r.•..ro......w.1..ca r..r....r. m;'J+'.yt� 1 .., i'° •t 9 . :rva� .. •. . 7e, , J tit!l 3 W • o ....° °` t s : • �e.•...e Y... �•.[ e 4.• .° i ♦•. 'e r•W 47:<°r••r•1• �•• .c °` .. 14 ' ,7 1./N _I } \ _ 7-p s L. �,•6 .• =V:rrf----' . --.. 14 ' °% -. � P,zo•,`^o'z--'.,j c 4313•' �7. , .,•. 'a`-' = - �`, `--- --p�-1'- ♦ 1 _;,•__ -, • 'n~ � I'll,`'P i k \• ,•. '`N 77.2 7'14-E �,e/ �.•w•.• °• I 1284.22 .".a/< ° ,//' . • • l/+ i ° 4 3 .<o a....•.. .[<....,. . •2 •Y.....< 4.Y.•.•. .r...•<...,•Ya•. _ Y r'� `.. 1• Q" L • • m° r, <.. el .•4.• ..• .•".fig r ..Yme» 9hr { '/ 2 I • ,. U t. it f ""� I • /J•--i-is .,....,a �,°.�.�.•:'m:[ "' �b w + ,s. i 1Y� '.='- ."`_ _ zD�� - ' —'. ,`_ - "0"'i°-----i,--pp•�� v.;,�---T�` - .ter---•,- '.."Iib_i • -1-_ ••..o-.07. w • • _� /_ / ,� �^ .�. '�•e..r•Y•.I 36e/ S 7T28'O2 27 ••J•!ed• / 2] f>—__ —T_�_,_ I.t 194.30— —.. — S y/ °�Llu• ° +uma ir•• • ---/ , ,•22' ' "~"=`.—wo+:•—•`_•;• - --• - °. -.- t- rs•�.--��I - ^°\_ ��•..r • -� __• ' _ —• - • +^:c^�.p•"'r. i"° ,. Os c 2, ,• ;.'' *• PI .• .Zo ^J r =�1 .. —a '•e-�-.• ,— ••—�T-_P � •�;.•..<,,,�d,' -,{—,r y' -!�'p, ,! --,15 ;•`,, -' _T..u.. .M) t. ,c 1 • I. Z f •' ✓r Jf'�� •�� cs _ '�, ,,� a G._ ,• ,�[c.+c li°,o1-..•' —_._ _ r __._. ' _J.ep • _ 7 I/ r v. ni o • .•[[.,�...,[: °<.. :..-_. •-I yr//7SW GRADY WAY I } s�" I �1 co _ .17: ir I cc /.1" / . imic - LL i � k. 1• M w • ti1 .c-1 41 ._i.... " •,,' ‘.. .i.. , - ". . 1 --).:::•:••:•" • .:....::+ .-„,.,...• - .. - • LAND USE EL,'-'1ENT ,,..-.. .i::,:: . I ___ ..:,:.,/,,, :• ••:i.:::::.: i,,,,,,:y: •__ ____,:t.--,..„ ..:.. .:,-,::::::: :,..,-,A'•#ii:.i: ..•• •• . • V°.° •'.'•:.:.. 7 Single Family 1111111111 Commercial 1., 1). 1..1 [....t.,., 3 .T Z_C:4_)I i•:.;rirlir: 1 1:310°°10°°O. 0000 .. ill iiii ' ,..- FAO /11111,111 41. Low Density 4 \ ,e- t-:77:T77:':':'::::. - gi ' '• Office / Office Park FV-^- tv),. ....111111t.1 Eig'''''''..'''''''4--- A•Pfit :.:•:•:::::::::::: Multi-Family .. ....... Iriidk ,•4 ' •:::::::.:•:•:.:.:. * .. '-';.1: ....`•• 0. ii:::::::::.::::rinvi :::i Miri,,igliiit' • i ;',,1 .. .. .'''.. ':::i*::•FrAlit k.,Mi. L.14251114 !: • • •- • ,•• •:•:•:•:•:: Medium Density „ ..0...0.4010 Multi-Family , Public/Quasi-Public • •••!.- .,'.:..::r:'.(le• • .:: .i.•.::::::..:..:..:...:.0.1.Wiiii•iii11 r %'4il5; 1 NI i .•;••••• 'il % .iiii: Mil iii.11 Pkt ••• •-_.7-- •I A - ' W.q•P' High Density Light Industrial .n:::::::..pw: . Multi-Family • • • •• • ,., 11._1•_•_•_ • . J.., MINE , .4 0.0.• •K:i4t...b‘A•V•• • • • • :.I . Welew •••Ck, I: o o•.... ...1.t. • • • • • ..,., A ,:t•-!'. ar' 0 0 • • •. • r•.••' 1, --• •0 0 e,.. l 1"C,f;•:.i.C.'.' i • • • • • ...;.',. •• T7crte.f, Recreation • • • " • • • • Heavy Industrial • • • •• . .,..0. ,,. • • • , • ..-,: l• oo• : ".5.1"4., • • • •••••••••• 1•,:e! ik ikdi • • • • • y .% lie i .. • • • • ,• ...• • • • 1h. V 0. ..;,..s,:..,..,.. Greenbelt _ _ ______ Manufacturing Park ' ••••••• • "aVP / _.A4e • . i .:.:.: !•re.e""i. e` / Multiple Option '.'•?•7f7 o•ooil lirt$A- ....., . ..._.1 .A-• I 000000 .- - .01:1 . i'"7 .•.. ..•• ... ... _____ '4.4, • ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:....• .. 4.11. .gog0g0g02,0gegAt'',. ..0074,A. 1.•:.• :•••:.::•:_ :-.. .) 1:.,1:::.:1••:::.111 11161::11_a1 1c-,-2-2t ijW itAo)WA.gOtki.•,,.,e.,: im.•::::m:i:i:i,:i,.:i:.:i,.:i::.i::..ii:ii...:..:.:.:..i.:ii:: 0.009..%3..9.93o0%,n.300%t-i00°00=..°90=093%=•P0-..0.0 g . ,, g00 0 ET1.0002 1 g... . .00000000.0 0,%,c IIlitidep A icythill:,_il.„' • •••••.'n''" '.' -iiii]]:ii::::i: ::i:ii:i:ii P.{6°,0°0°0°0°0°0% %c. Nu ', I Illyik . 0000 .3 11 -Irte "":,•,?:_ •••:A•re. ,-,•, 1 °°"° 4, '...;iiiiiIiiiiiiR .ii,:.::J,i. .9)°,891 c • rr/ ::. ..,cvn.:- . .,• Npriaiii It hi:.A. I ., . . .,A ,,,,,..mi:i:ii:i:!::::i ..5-a..sc: ,i!ii.giigi;:::::i::::::.,. ..,i,-....: ., ..,....:p.,7,,..„.r,.,.. • p 1 i P'Por.s.;i•.`ci),•‘.. **.%404,14 *pi'.L::' A iiniiin: ,..„. 0.0• --imp...4 im. •'.0:'\'•,4...:11,4voc., N * • Pill': 11:1111 1 111111111i1;1111. d ,..,.. I- ,• •..F:- --go, „fp.zyi . .{:V , '•:•:::::::::::.:.' ;3.,....),,,,,7,:.?•:,!..,%.r..% ‘i.:..)::?,AC.41..ci.r.j1,:rk:r.1 1,:''j•-•,4';.:,?;-..:42,&.i.:,j-;•...-Ff;',15,'-',5?i'r?":;,S.;':-.(?';',' • •••rt,r.1... c i' ii,...,-,xv,,,.t1 .,„p-.'.•-• ?•.,•, nJ••:,,•"-Q 1-5.7',,,e •':'••';', --,....:"' , tv,••,:rv.LiSc "rims loursamihr. a EI Dr.IVA 1°,0: . .., -rt',14•;'6.•:'. :3,,.0..`.4,1'r.,,•,• '1/2,'',•';',''72 C:'''0'1 '''-:-.'. --------------- '''',,,''''•,.,-", '-'1••••41110,01209 ilil 111111 rAlil . 1 I '); ..•N....rr.4,....4.••n.,,(...c mil,V.04 e.p•,,;.•14 pj...n;LT-. . -• r,...,,...:7,.., \ ..,....c,?0. v 0:.x4s..,. 'moo -'. ••'-'3.‘fP'' ---_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_--_-_- 'ci...,..-•;M:::::::::::: :::::::•:72°.MRP... , r 1 p .„.., • •n• ••''',. -..ticiti.,Let,' lino 1,.'0-:,..,-- ... -,71..,Fi.-:!;-•'„--_-_---=--=-=-:- '''.' .;%:':,:::i:MiON:Mg:. „11 III kr-r. ..,,.-3.6,114 ..,,,;,:,,,,,;, ....i,- • .s.• "I - I I 11.4 •v.',5'...c.1:: ..... .1'..,:':,•?7'.?:•jr,'".1i.'; ?..''''',.;',.0' .7. ... 'i:3-..-- -.-..1"..r... 1‘..4.,-. :41.7.:'ilr'''.--:;•"1: '•• •/1.1',A.„•s)",?•.:,•Q•i'il n •;•••••.' '''•;..:8::9S:'•••:•' ' ..------.. '''',i:•',-.:::-•‘..., _-:A all/M0-=--=-=-1- '.....::.:'! ii 1 f r g•.`.!••." • • -: :-_-_--_-_--=-Off ice---- - .. "r,c`i 4 ]Ci • . 1.11K '4 • lii. ''.i-9',..;..ii,..e.:',.p:.,?,•„,!.;•51• ',-'..,n , --',,-,.•"'-'..- • • • -.(„ 0 0 1,,:.:•,,f..,;?,,,....1.:„!...,.,;::c.).,,,,...,..3.,i.t,,,,:.,:..,;,-,,,,..4.v,..:,,,,,,,,..;,,.,..1-e.,.„,,....•...t. 2 0 . •,..;... . :„:(k1.'S' -t)`'d n'''n'f `;'••••1.^ 7,4,1 •• W 011 I :ggi:i P....ird, .s.tp.,•.9§6. , •(•.-.(1 si.i!'01.4•:‘ ,rist,'•!..41••c11)•;;q -.• II •-::`1.. .T,°•• . •;;;;:1?-.' •`;!:'?'...”',!;:.+31 P'‘.:1-:';''..fi' i.)':.'''eli::" .1-7- ,000000-••-:------ - -: PLA10.-_ ! pi _. ..;...- ...miliNgs• •••Iii,'.7- Pg.iiii!WW1 ' '-"oir.‘... . ,i f. ..e.. 0, ..,,b, ,• •(•• •• (2.(' •.••• •c. •1 ,....,,,,p.,• 0 .4.1"..r" .,";'!''' :(:r ii13`;'''';',..ko'.§'?('-'n•V:';:i.'•:"Y.,.1.,`!q.4;),••,;',,...;.6 b000cpoom....,,:..• _-_-_-_-_:- :-.-:--_---.---, ..,„,.i•.•-, I si •• ••I o h .•::i::::.:..... z.,,• • .. •.,„..., il,.• . „r„.. ,,,. ••<,) •,"-,"• r'' `I"•E> "'O.' • .p00D3D,•0o p,o00•oo.-c00•n0 7•00,0•.0o0„.X•0o o00•0c-io000ata:•00 1.._.r0,I,'_0i.-i!0,,...4.:,:,."._.0...•;,r•„m_.1. -.-.-_..-7-_=. t,it_-.- ‘i:-Ng6 0,.y- 111 1 I III i r1i l i•-11m.1•;1• :l°:1_2. •::,,:,:....•::::::•:0:•:::•:•:::•:,::•:,:.:•::-:::;•::m:•.:::.•:.:•.:.•.•:•.::.::•..::,.:. '',1'...0',::,,fz:ti7,i:..:,..•p,..,',.'.•...,,'0 111 { 1 . ,,, q.'.,1•;1•"A.:,,..:u.i.:•:•..•,..•..•1:,•:i,c .•,,,•.,...,ik.„..4.•oin1"tt-O3:OA''-,00%on00oo,.o .o ib%i-,"1;*.',,-'•r'.•,-;i'•.,•'',i,"..,'.:1',::vV•:.•.n,......1....„,'..-..Wi.1,.•,;••.W••.c2.e'...,,.:....f..,....' !'•,..0•.:..::•• :.:,,„„: „,::::::,::::::::::::::: A.,• 11, • - • ,.., Astilidues. . • .::i:::i::'..:M: ,. -,:,;;•-3,:,.,(7,.;:,..),:,<. ;i:.:;;..t..r,1 . . a is I 1 111114_ _ L.--------1. t-_.-_-_-_- _-_-_-_-_-_: .i .is• ••:•:•:•:•:•:•:.:::•. •, --"--- a .....0%°..ik• .3,, .0%,:::..:\...A.....„...- 1 Nik:AL. :, .":.::::i .. Ng•.070°01 09. °tifi 1141111=s:\-7=======Th--1-2-======: 7 I .4• n IFF-1...5:!, •...:.... •0 lif '020 :*.:.:.. •••-;i ', .•....,• 0 0 :.:.:.:.:•:•:.. .' • •:•:•:•:. 1 0 C Nrgi .i 1111 ! WA=:=714_P7 MCU:----=----_-=.----7=H .:r•-:;': I 1 1 illni li iiir.:,77=11-7_ --_-_-_-__=_=_:00 00 00 8 7=-1.--ill_ .:i;3•. 0 0 0 ill%:•:•:•:.:.. '.3.j ..:.:•:•• sit r°0:00C ....1.:::::::::::::::::::r. •.:::: •:.F7-",,,:•:.,.5::..'IP .:.:iiiiii:::.:::if:::::•.• ",:-1 -o 11110h 1174: ''''' IN li II II pi • i1 i Ili ril'..'---:------- --------- ------_-_-_-_- •:,;,,'?', : k Nil or 1 :Sill F.• -------- ----------------------------- '-',,.. . 1 ,:.........:.......::::i:::::::.. •-' ..... ..'F. - _117,,,go 1 • •- i-0.-.-.-.... ..7 7 7.7 -..7 7.7.7.7 7 -' ..."";::•': .•:: (,. ... -....11. 000000 ,=1.-T--------- :•:•:•:..1 n n n n n flr., .a / . .00000. NM lig I Eli -.--.-- 'ocicral e ,... • 'm P_.°_0°.°09,00 1 9.55; I • •13"0:0'0'0'' .. ,.. IAIL! 1 g_ ••..,•.1.-----7 . =----__---_--_=-'.. --_----_-_--_--:_--=_-=.-. .'.. ••‘ TVA', ';:tt' .• n000000 000000 fir. NI i iiiiilr.,..Aff. ---:-.1-__-_-_: -...:--_-_-_-_:-_ -._.. -__.:. .,.:- .0.0orycr. ,,,-. , Ve 2 i " " "'""E ''.7=A10-=f ----------: iMPLMO_ _-_ .,...,..,. 1 I I Ilim .,..---------:. -:-------=-=-: ------- --- `-'.(•• 1 . - 00.930,600 - ..2 ., ir .. .. _ •i, ----- ----.-=------------ ---2 ..--:: I • 1• _... . iiiii 2 ..V.P,i. ...viv•-- =..E..7..-'._- -_-_-_-. -_-_-_-_-- - -_-- . , . ! 'RI • .0.3.,,,.- .•-,• .,,,-,.:','.0--69.-.ze,:-;;-... -_--- --------i- ----- 5 f' 'E:. y___ ._1`,:v • :;'),!(;,)1. SW - •••. 't*, I;- 1-•:7=-737.---7=-7---7:7----7-t '-i•"5.;:t.;•S'..0-J .'1,:.' -_-=-=_-=.-.-=.-----:---7.---)=: E-:=-:: :'.:; 11 . ... .., ,• .• • ' :::.124b, \.•-- •. ::::_hip afoit==.=:_-_-_-_-_:_- . ._-:•-•-•-_--_-.--_-_--_---_-_-=-7-±:LC1.4 -_-7-:-. '.-...' _ . .• . ... . . • -----_- 1--------------------------.7-1..1 ---_--2-- g..7,' I ,•:::.:::::::::.•::;:.:;:::::i:i:::....:''...:.:.: % ,. \ f Jp101 1 1 : ••••::• El Ai::•iE:;.:.fin::.1111:11111111111 . '..f, 1 , ______/ p •..:.:• :.:::::::::::::::::::::::..., ....I Naomi ki . .. 'llIlltt•k: •OVITSK1 --:..-----__-----1.1' --------------------- ----------- gg I ..... . . - --_:-.-4 -11 . • A.,•:1 . . .. ,•••,:s....:, r ,...,(74, .:::::. r•. ... , t000.000cpx.00.0.071 .,..i . ..... • 1 ,... .. ....atelci .0............. . •''..,'. -....... .., co %foe•0•..:•co 0.0°0° :: .,. . • L s..I >•93°0°093°.'0°0°0°093°0' .::: '::::: ...:•.:'-''' 1 a 00000•00000• .:•:• :.:•:•: 6=-Q...,..•..7,•. .. -__.._.----- " ---,. f----:I Y, \ . ocnocp830..ocpcp0000,• r„ i: ii' .1•••.:,„5.:•?.;....:hi.. • \ ,. :.:..;..7.F..o.o0o..0o.o• ...,,.,,:,.,.o.,.2,...(,?..?..f,.,;••.1 ri . :7- • \ ,,,,, .::::::•:•:•:•: :i::i:. ' •.•;?i,-'•' '''',- ' ' :1 '75 , etwo....... • .,,.., • ... . .• •:. 1 1 1 . • , •; . ,.• 1 ;:itibir.";?;1',1:4i.:?A'•vr44. ,- _ - - lit -4,Lft,-4. I, , --_----------;• \\ \\ '‘' ) ; IL R-1 \ i __ �\ AIL ,R_ F� FOUR-0`37 . 15 __ B-=1 .. \ •. , ,:. - r ,• , i 1 y . I - Sol b YSC'Y 1 II $.k. . ''C W VIE 1 _ . > . w o >'' ..4 i I2i F �9 1 . 1 , .1100111! I II I II,,---r— -----viiirraill631bIll , , I . .. goo 1 1 . , RN./'R I it I L ,._____- ,,, \c„, _,,,,,,c, . ",1-,51-c _ ... • II i 01u-et° 001II' \ aF sN�-r Lam' 0 Il�u�� I III 1� IO '' c,� 1I IIIIII IIII, i 11. ;I 17--- 1r - W-IIIIIp ,1011 InP '411IQ� III _ I>1T1Ii1i9 T,. _ __ - FR9T \\\ \� /.*\* 1 1O — � 1— '' Q' .. j.is ; \�� r l.f q " ..I.. /0 lat i / Alk i- ' --- --:1 ii;il .II 2 ----- • � ANEW� .�� rr_ ---I"---Q 'JI _'' , mii_ t. .. — - -rya ! CZ-+ i Il - Ma0.1.11111,+ ka` 40 RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-064-88 APPLICANT BOB STALP (LANPHERE ENTERPRISES) TOTAL AREA 4.09 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. GRADY WAY • EXISTING ZONING B-1, BUSINESS USE EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE NEW CAR DEALERSHIP COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMERCIAL • • COMMENTS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. AND S.W. GRADY WAY. • • -a: • t® • • AI. • ,y • ,:p{ D e aI • •awry'co- '�/ MM.( fBy 6 • �eli,cMW-..f.fH.4.f M.� tw.a �\ .,-y._ C0: . •Cry, ,r""� +I cR..ito rs.im WARM) _ I I !" I- _..—.-..- rr:,t� Parts and Service $ales ^'A Mff— 7O"'O� / ;" H.• •tn.sss • • L • • '�I� t / 1 . ' — . . IRMIIIMP IMRR MR bm•IM12110M '/ / . .mrm O.Olwrr (J.rZ-r.Jd.Er�'QSM`( h ••, I I/ um" • .Ar. pJ , - J//T�� II//�/ A..- _ — 9e I I . - xrwpw"'�`,w.o / / i D • / )ul I I I I I �`�`I`I`�`�`�`) l I IT`/ l L. ,"I AYL,q— I Ir et.'�: �.Nw.y LLj : . . . .• --_�— / p ,• I ` ., l L • U F ''�'�,. IE �.. ri+n ae•K'.,.. fig {".' • �' w.aaD lea.. .....) n>1Or. 1 �,i .rti'.•R ��I..uo""�'.;ono // 5 vi '-E i r • AMMO n w..�r+E D+,...n i �w..--,. � uc ass MORAY .ss.a.....�� „ ;��- /""wur burs c�+Ati� / / D....o -...o,.�i �� '�� a =e o 1.. 1 / i • r . • —r'->-- vi C. _ �" 7-in . T-1-� —ram _. �-5 R t S a .. s is o _ _ _ _ _ i<_ —SW Grady�YaY — e •` _—J' .e.r u,w,c �. ' � = a - - - - = -��-- ' - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - / i Ij ,, _:.)„ , , • -----.< fie Site Plan i' t 1 KEY rw......0. ® II 9 M • ? •�'�' i\i \/\/\, \/\. \. \ /. i�/ .m•R•..,..,T.....e......ra. 0 r:- tI C.CIT Cr..wrW(Il...o)II•D-b 4, • • IA• ,•.FI • / M ArMl . � / (,1..y. / �k_aN. F / 9DL Et N r. • :!^ 1 SP or 4 a.e. W! W 1 m Site Section A—A' �.,....;.a I. �` c I Slte Statistics V' gUhD1�lG USE TYPE_ I m..m la V 7 A-*uto*Am L • a (.a..a 1.. a Mart.,a M.I .• • m.� r...:-- al o G:�..- • m.w.w...AT.mcoad..r,.....r.r.m,..... r r� > `. Q Q R-RETAIL • • m.l.,a•m.e Lemma loc 1 o m..m�c mum-u a.mas • mix am a� .r..a Sol W. _ • • �-( L-,COR.ERCIAL F .m.m...cc. r • O-OFiICE pLD4 � G � c • ^(raa L•.Te•m•o v,no,rrp a ra[,ram.••rc,m rm immemaR try. O • �� O M'-wARE.0u9E IJ A ORr .Ma.Yms mrr �•�..nrr m.v..m a.• am mom • �_.I ~ T G OYOYTDOD,i•TORAOE i i . j D-W y{le ..a..•.�c,re Nw.,a,...r su..r. .,l`r. ::1�` ® 'D _ ra..,..sr 9l..cr.cm W i (n Q .MOLE FM.,RE.oE.CE I N 01a0 •mr.ram frsd m er w>w m•..warn.N er.r�• .�: f�: I� Z wY•...M...I..• • I 0 ..�•.4.,...N•P•ml a m a.em• la..•f ea s -•I J ��' > r---,-- am, �Erma .Mile T.a OM m,•RAMS. • u•� . .... •. �� y CO O it m.e .I.a re..„r...,.,Of MIR.•. o�, . JZrI I •.a lll:.e m I�r..•ARM.,sa,.R.uw•w. •.,, r�.® _ '*7. r ,.r •�.+�i..m.Ra eoa>N+r�. em`�imr rraWo 13{ < 4�" •z ' WCO a M avu+.•r r�+ 9w - 1 -_ O Gradv .p4il rL..,r u�.. •'•`.d .. ..• ..,,re a •a+i'a i;: .„.:. —� CI ¢ m..sT'.�u v�-,.-...•...n•.0 a w.w e.••.m. Lr.r .i W -" j I'� 0 - •�.m: . j1O�i+•rr.�,.v" ss`.i.m.113 i,..tr.eprt v..�n,':a w`i r,r�'°.ur,° �—� y ��" OM a[r m mN L•m�•amm f�10. • i b ,zln❑ c G� 0 L:i..+e`mOam m.•..arq No. .s WO UR.cf 1Iti:w�".e....... ..a. ; — Yr � .. rovclTb•Y.aW.Ort r. �r m.•.d .... . IRE AA_1 1 Vicinity Map Ime m Ible MR AM M•.r.a — ®.. 3 I4...e ,•.yo, ur.•.u r••••.r f EA,w.r ee rru•am. ••.rr..AM. •p . $ li(1 J 886T b T AO N it • NO1ha38 j0 All0 • NOISII►IO ONINI Id • • • • ii % • I • n O n T O O 1. 5 ,Lifb ; p o] , I,lil...,{ i I I i i f_ i i a • =1 ',come rj \ I.' • 7 .. 1 • • sa I ---_ 169 q I 7 O.-it, • SECOND FLOOR PLAN , Aa+1g+ "eaR.p y ueiro I 1 14.V r x.nr.,� •rr..nrn v.n HE. _ n.w.... / 1 896T 17 T AON a •-J NOl(.,+3!1 JO A.1.10 NOi;1,16.1`1AkiluV7d :1 41-1 ca rf r. 1 , , m . o -, I I . w v m w • m w w 1 ' 1 P. w m m 1 I • I 1 1 1 :.,, zC:r'r — — v i___L_______________r €__r_:____,_ _7_____cif__ 8. .JJ $§ _ I l c • y- . 4 �31 a1 11 : .7. Fl 74 Fi II o F 11llll1llLLl • - yt il ii 1 a li Fn.. i - [al 1 J c • ( i ----1 - -P, ; o j :.: —--i—'7 1 ' ,,_,:•• .171:. �� 1 d • 1 . • _.tj1ielattl ._Pssoplti .tjska7��J1�E�#�'� p9 k q.lL:4 rnpJOaopAiEtio4-7r...:1g4t}}•-•�g�--�-"P..�ittX�s *4141ee4041141 FIRST FLOOR PLAN .1 '"..s.1_pe . = = • • 1I �_ m elcnlu//m _.N_.—... I__.I.il_®on—8 s b n 1 n C i_----- -- 1 ��p - ��•eli��7`� Shl ft.W 'pvt.L eNyofl 0 ' . _. . n '.1 Vu 11 •', 3 L1.1 ii 1 j 886T V I A ON a NOIN3U J01113 Noisinia ONINNVI1 .,• D -77,-,--- - ----, [ D q00 (D - 0 .1, § r -,,; . _ z --I _ . . _ C , ,ii 111H l' il CI) -..-_____ •-_ — 1 i I 0 in! Si g ...___------ ---......_____ -.----____________ — - / ,... _ _ / 1 1 i 1 1 1 S - 1 71 . -------- • . g __ _-:= . _ _PI qi P .pr,F gi . - 01lD1 iIr i 1 i R1 33 1 • d 4 . 0 0 r i 1 ci a ./1 ,h . .. ,,/ I.: __• Iiii 1 1. i -____ 3 — i• __ ... — • i P"--) • ..., ..,..0 r-- 31 , ) I • • , . frf ' . / z 1 • 1 1- —- --1 — - '---•' 2 f \ V I ; • ,..-54! '5 :‘,;, i 1% ,,,a zi 1 ik i If P IY ° ii 11 M 1 I — • ST 4 ro I, ,: 1 lil 4 I "-I 1!?. 1 1 1 .?. ' ____.• • I 1 r- ........-..--41 - 0 co z , r .1117 i III ) i i t 1.7] ! $011ti ---i• •t, 0 ...--- 5 tat) I o 1 • - o N A g 4 111R li i lL !II I :0 '. . , i '443 •ai I !,Aliicia a 0 1" : 0 (14,4 \g• 1 ‘1‘s WA rill,p 1138: li tii g t .i a . '" -,......_ .4, , . :: :.__. N . ------- ,,,„ igitittittitquibetd.int.kiiitzt—nrili` • . . ( LANDSCAPE PLAN ) °'"i/si MO I- ........,..,,,.0. cT loinpl ,.,.. K-. :. cc : Bc _ calp rs 11-1E BLA _LOCK W MPA.T Mark Gleason { s" =i:. eci&isls in land-use procedures Pam Purtinten P {-LIT October 4 , 1988 TO rrin- Mr. Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Community Development Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 'RE: RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL ECF-064-88/ SA-064-88 Dear Mr. Erickson: • Lanphere Enterprises offers the following comments concerning the Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance as issued by the Environmental Review Committee on September 14 , 1988 . Condition #1 . The property is located in a commercial/industrial area. The way that the condition is stated suggests that hours of construction can only be from 8 : 30 to 3 : 30 Monday thru • Friday. This would •appear to prevent construction on weekends . We would request that the language be changed to limit off-site hauling by construction vehicles from the hours of 6 :30 a.m. to 8 :30 a.m. and from 3 : 30 p.m. to 6 : 60 p.m. Monday thru Friday. Conditions #2 , 3 and 4 . Are acceptable and will be complied with during construction. Condition #5. Includes numerous traffic related improvements . Coordination of Access Points . The site plan as submitted limits access onto Grady Way to two points . One access would align with the extension of Maple Avenue S .W. We have specifically combined access to the three legal lots to only two points to lessen traffic impacts . We do not believe any further modifications are necessary. 10737 NI: 1-ourth Slre(t. Suite 9 Bellevue, Washington.98004 (206)455-j 550 RENTON HONDA ECF-064-88/ SA-064-88 October 4 , 1988 page 2 Signalization. We assume signalization is meant for the intersection of S .W. Grady Way and Maple Avenue S .W. However, contacting the Traffic Engineering Division, we have discovered that first a a Traffic Warrant Analysis for the intersection was requested with possible bonding for installation. Lanphere Enterprises conducted a preliminary meeting on April 10 , 1988 with the City of Renton to determine issues . The greatest concern was traffic and access . We were told that a traffic analysis was not necessary since the area had been so intensively studied and the actual' physical improvement were known. At the suggestion of the City we accepted the idea of a traffic signal at the. intersection of Maple Avenue S .W. and S .W. Grady Way. The site plan was redesigned 3 times to reflect input we received from the City in April and May. Discovering that a two way left turn is now proposed by the Traffic Engineering Division confuses us and we are concerned that our whole site plan may be inappropriate . We agreed with several City Department heads 6 months ago that signalization of Maple and Grady was critical and we wanted to install the traffic signal , which would be charged against our area wide improvement participation. Yet, the Mitigated DNS does not require participation in the Grady Way Traffic Benefit Area plan. We had assumed substantial participation based on our traffic generation of approximately 960 daily vehicle trips . It seems very odd that the City is turning down a developer who wants to install improvements. In addition, Traffic Engineering had requested a trip generation analysis considering impacts on the intersections of (1) S .W. Grady Way and Powell Ave . S .W. and (2) S .W. 7th Street and Hardie Ave . S .W. to consider our proportionate share in latecomer ' s agreements for those intersections . At this time it does not appear that our project would have any impacts on S .W. 7th. Street . The cost of paying back these late comer agreements should have been included in the area wide fees . ' RENTON HONDA ECF-064-88/ SA-064-88 October 4 , 1988 page 3 Creation of Right-in/Right-out Routings . Again we were told in April that we would be limited to right-in/right-out access for the eastern access point; that = a two way left turn lane was impossible. The only right - turns would be allowed at the signalized intersection of S .W. - Grady Way and Maple Avenue S .W. Now the City seems to be requiring that we redesign again. = - Condition #6 . The present site plan shows pedestrian circulation around the building and out to the public sidewalk along Grady Way. Condition #7 . We will provide a specific exterior lighting plan at the time of building permit application. Condition #8 . • As a result of the configuration of the new street improvements proposed by the City for S .W. Grady Way, it is impossible to provide any lawn areas between the sidewalk and curb. along the eastern portion of the site . Along the western two-thirds of the site a gradually increasing area can be devoted to lawn. Because of the shape and width, berming of the area is not reasonable . We would anticipate the same disaster that occurred along S .W. -43rd Street with maintenance. We believe that the vertical streetscape that we are proposing with the introduction of larger street trees is more important to create a positive image . Condition #9 . Our present plans call for the creation of an 18 inch berm on the first 10 feet of the subject site . This is where we intended to create the vertical streetscape . We believe that an 18 ' inch berm above the sidewalk grade would be sufficient to screen the automobiles and act as the suggested 15" high decorative screen. However, we believe after discussions with Mr. Jerry Lind that a 24 inch berm could be used that would still allow visibility of the new car dealership and provide the intended streetscape . RENTON HONDA ECF-064-88/ SA-064-88 October 4 , 1988 page 4 Condition #10. We believe that this condition may be misstated. The original request we had from the City in. preliminary meeting in March was to provide room to widen Rainier Avenue to allow the City to create a new right turn lane. We believed this would be part of the S.W. Grady Way project. Since the dedication was not obtained as part of the original short platting of the property and it is not critical to any construction on the site, it must be a necessary area wide and the value of the land should be charge against our area . wide participation. Thank you for the opportunity to submit comments . Sincerely, Ro er J. Blaylock CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9: 00 AM, NOVEMBER 22, 1988 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed below are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL ECF;SA-064-88 Application for site plan approval for a new Honda automobile dealership with construction of a two story building of steel and glass, approximately 34,500 sq. ft. in size, which will house offices, showroom,. and service bays. The property is located at the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. METRO -SILVICULTURE ECF;SA;SP-085-88A Development of a silviculture demonstration to illustrate the effects of sludge fertilizer on tree growth through the planting of Douglas fir (30, 000 sq. ft. ) and hybrid poplars (75,000 sq. ft. ) to show the differences in growth rates between trees fertilized with sludge and those grown without sludge. The property is located at the Renton Sewage Treatment Plant at Oakesdale Avenue and SW 7th Street. BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: Bob Stalp, Lanphere Enterprises FILE NUMBER: ECF-064-88, SA-064-88 LOCATION: Located on the NW Corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval to construct a two story, 34, 500 square foot building to house offices, showroom and service bays for a new Honda Dealership. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Eugene Horbach 2 . Applicant: Bob Stalp/Lanphere Enterprises 3 . Existing Zoning: B-1, Business Use 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: B-1, Business Use; L- 1, Light Industrial; M-P, Manufacturing Park. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial 6. Size of Property: ± 4 . 09 Acres 7. Access: SW Grady 8. Land Use: Undeveloped Property 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Commercial Uses (Shopping Center,. Fast Food) East: Commercial Uses (Sound Ford Automobile Dearlership) South: Single Family, Multiple Family) West:. Undeveloped Property C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Rezone R-101-80 3499 1/14/81 Short Plat SP-100-80 3/02/81 Site Approval SA-042-83 Withdrawn ' PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER Renton Honda Site Pla approval PUBLIC HEARING Date Page 2 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: A 12 inch water line is located near the the west and north property lines of the site. b. Sewer: An 8 inch sanitary sewer line is located along Lind Avenue SW, west of the site, and a Metro trunk line is located along the north property line. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit: Several Metro Transit lines operate along Rainier Avenue South and SW Grady Way, adjacent to the east and south property lines. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: NA b. Middle Schools: NA c. High Schools: NA 5. Recreation: NA E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-711, Business Use (B-1) 2 . Section 4-738, Site Plan Review F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Commercial Goal and Objectives, Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986. 2 . Central Area Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986. 3 . Proposed Grady Way Benefit District. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Bob Stalp/Lanphere Enerprises, seeks site plan approval to allow the development of a new Honda dealership on the site. The applicant proposes a 34,503 square foot building, two-stories in height (approximately 35 feet in height at the tallest point) and constructed of masonry, steel and glass. The first floor consists of a 5,200 square foot showroom which will be located on the eastern end of the building adjacent to a 60 foot drive-through. The drive-through area will be used for on-site circulation and to allow the temporary parking of vehicles for customers using the adjacent service area to the west. The remainder of the first floor of the building includes an 8,060 square feet auto repair area located along the west end of the building and accessed by two roll-up doors on the south and west sides of the building. The remainder PRELIMINARY REPORT TO,HE HEARING EXAMINER Renton Honda Site Pla, :Lpproval PUBLIC HEARING Date Page 3 of that floor will consist of parts storage, tool storage, washrooms, restrooms, and an area for the service advisors, dispatch and cashier. The second floor consists of 13,805 sqare feet. This area includes space for additional parts storage, employee lunchrooms and restrooms, a conference area, and office space. The eastern portion of this space is open to the showroom below on the first floor. The outside area consists of parking and outdoor display areas. The applicant has provided 93 parking stalls which include 2 handicapped stalls. The outdoor storage area consists of approximately 77,483 square feet. . The remainder of the site consists of landscaping. The applicant has also included a "Welcome To Renton" sign located on the corner of Rainier Avenue South and SW Grady Way. The plans call for a special landscaping treatment in that portion of the area immediately surrounding the sign. 2. The history section shows that in 1983 an application was made for site plan approval. This application was for a VIP's Mexican Restaurant, but was withdrawn by the applicant. 3 . The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the project on September 14, 1988 with the following conditions: a. That the applicant shall be required to limit off-site hauling by construction vehicles to the hours between 8:30 a.m. and 3: 30 p.m. Monday through Friday. b. That the applicant shall be required to provide wheel washing for all trucks before those vehicles enter the roadway from the construction site in order to minimize tracking of dust and debris from the site. c. That the applicant shall provide a bond in the amount of $2, 000. 00 for street cleaning. d. That the applicant shall develop a plan for erosion control subject to approval by the Public Works Department, to protect the subject parcel and surrounding properties from damage resulting from erosion of the site during construction operations. e. That the applicant shall provide a revised plan, redesigning and relocating access points to the site via Grady Way, including, but not limited to, coordination of access points, signalization, creation of right-in/right-out routings. These improvements should be subject to approval by the Police Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Design Engineering Division, and Traffic Engineering Divisions of the City of Renton. ' PRELIMINARY REPORT TO -TIE HEARING EXAMINER Renton Honda Site Pla ,pproval PUBLIC HEARING Date Page 4 f. That the applicant shall provide a revised plan which includes pedestrian linkages from the site to the sidewalks surrounding the site, and to adjacent properties. g. That the applicant shall provide a plan for controlling exterior lighting to ensure that glare is directed away from adjacent properties and public rights-of-way. h. That the applicant shall provide bermed lawn areas between the street, curb, and sidewalk areas to visually soften the site and provide .a protection buffer between motorists and pedestrians. i. That all parking areas adjacent or near to street property lines shall have decorative visual buffers to screen the lower portions of parked cars. (Note: a minimum of 15 inch high decorative screen is suggested. ) j . That the applicant designate the right turn lane on Grady Way on the site plan approval. 4. With respect to the traffic mitigation measures imposed by the Environmental Review Committee, the applicant has provided the City with a letter of understanding dated November 4, 1988, regarding the improvements to be completed by the applicant. This letter was a follow up to a meeting held with Gary Norris, the City's Traffic Engineer. 5. The applicant has applied for site plan approval. Section 4-738 (D, 1) of the Zoning Code on site plan approval, lists ten criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Plan Approval application. These include the following: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as suitable for Commercial uses. The project complies with the various commercial policies such as follow: o V.A.7. which states that "Commercial areas should be compatible with adjacent land uses. " o V.A. 10. which states that "Various uses within a commercial area should be compatible with each other. o V.B.4. which states that "Site plan design should provide for efficient and functional use of land. " PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Renton Honda Site Pla approval PUBLIC HEARING Date Page 5 b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The subject proposal complies with the development standards of the B-1 zone, Section 4-711 of the Zoning Code. The requirements for lot coverage for buildings, the height of the project, the building setbacks, and allowed uses section. The project complies with the requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. While the project does comply with the minimum landscaping requirements, the landscaping plan needs to be enhanced and the size of the berm increased to a minimum of 24 inches above the display area parking lot. This berm should include both the applicant's and the City's property. The applicant needs to work with the City's Landscape Planner on an acceptable landscape plan. c. Mitigation of impact to surrounding properties and uses; The subject site is not expected to adversely impact surrounding properties or uses. Immediately north of the subject site is a community shopping center comprised of principally vehicular-oriented retail uses and some office buildings. These structures are basically oriented away from the subject site so that there should be very little direct impacts from the service area of the subject proposal. The nearest building to the service area will be over a 100 feet away so that noise is not expected to be a problem. Since residential uses do not exist in the vicinity noise and glare are not expected to be a problem in that sense either. The ERC also has required that all light sources over 100 watts be shielded from view off site as well. Aesthetically the applicants are providing a lawned, berm in front of the proposed car sales/display area. This is intended to reduce the amount of car surface area that will be visible from the street and is expected to help soften the visual impacts of cars being displayed on the site. d. Mitigation of the proposed site plan to the site; The applicants are providing extensive landscaping including a treed buffer screen of the end wall of the retail building immediately to the north which otherwise would remain exposed because of the proposal's site plan, a lawned berm in front of the car sales display area, and a lawned parking strip between the sidewalk and the street curb. They have also offered to provide a "Welcome to Renton" sign in the lawned berm. Because of the high visibility of this site and its proximity to the Renton Village Complex and Holiday Inn Hotel, Staff would also like to see the applicant provide decorative sidewalks similar to those recently installed in the vicinity of N. 6th and Park Avenue N. recently. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO .TFE HEARING EXAMINER Renton Honda Site Plk },pproval PUBLIC HEARING Date Page 6 e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The subject proposal is expected to enhance property values in the area through the improvement of the property and overall exterior site treatment. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; Staff believe the applicant has provided adequate vehicular circulation. With respect to pedestrian circulation, staff believe this circulation system can be improved particularly from the surrounding sidewalks along the east and south boundaries of the property. The applicant should work with the City's Landscape Planner to ensure safe pedestrian linkages from the adjacent sidewalks to the service and display areas. This may include striping pavement areas for pedestrians. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The location of the building, together with the fact that the building is a maximum of 35 feet at the highest point, is not expected to adversely impact light and air to the surrounding properties. h. Mitigation of noise, odors, and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; Once construction is completed, the development is not expected to result in adverse impacts as a result of noise, odors, and other unhealthy conditions due to the design of the building and the fact that the site is located at the northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and SW Grady Way. Both roadways are major arterials and heavily traveled since Rainier Avenue turns into S.R. 167 just south of this intersection. In addition, a set of on and off ramps for 1-405 are located just south of the intersection. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and As noted above, the utilites such as water and sewer are located on or near the property. The Utility Engineer commented that the watermain will need to be extended with all the necessary ties required and that the City sanitary sewer manhole may be required to tie to the METRO manhole. In terms of the roadways, the City plans to improve SW Grady Way in the near future and an attempt will be made to coordinate the City project with the installation of off- site improvements required for the project. Transit service is readily available to the site (bus stops are located adjacent to the site which serve Seattle, South King County, Bellevue, Burien and various areas of Renton. ) Finally, neither police or fire indicated that the proposed development would PRELIMINARY REPORT TO tHE HEARING EXAMINER Renton Honda Site P1E Approval PUBLIC HEARING Date Page 7 create a burden on their respective services. Police did comment that coordination with their department should occur to minimize any potential traffic problems during construction and they wanted to ensure that adequate lighting, security and alarm systems are provided. The applicant should consult with the Police Department concerning the location and types of lighting, security and alarm systems installed for the development. j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The proposed development is not expected to have a deterious affect on surrounding properties. The development, as proposed by the applicant together with mitigation measures and site conditions recommended with this report, should result in a project that enhances the area and provides the catalyst for improvements to other properties in the immediate area. 6. Various City Departments and their Divisions have reviewed and commented on the application. These comments are attached to this report for review. 7 . The project, as modified through the environmental mitigation measures and the site plan conditions identified in this report, is in the public interest and should provide a postive development for the City together with an increase in tax revenues. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner approve the site plan application for Lanphere Enterprises, file SA-064-88, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant comply with the environmental mitigation measures of the Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated issued for the project and as modified by the November 4th letter to Gary Norris regarding some of the traffic improvement conditions. 2. The applicant should work with the City's Landscape Planner to ensure safe pedestrian linkages from the adjacent sidewalks to the service and display areas. 3. That the applicant consult with the Police Departmnet regarding the adequacy of the types and location of the lighting, security and alarm systems proposed for the site. 4. That the applicant needs to work with the City's Landscape Planner on an acceptable landscape plan. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO ?'9E HEARING EXAMINER Renton Honda Site Pla] approval PUBLIC HEARING Date Page 8 5. That the applicant provide decorative sidewalks similar to those recently installed in the vicin- ity of N. 6th and Park Avenue N. because of the significance of the site as a highly visisible gateway into the downtown area of Renton as well as to reflect the relatively high pedestrian levels expected over the life of the develop- ment in this part of town. • i l uu) Public ot�e• an addition of a new structure of"approxl '/irately 4,800 sq.ft. to provide space for religious activities and administrative offic- es. Property is located at 1111 South Carr Road. KOHL. PRELIMINARY PLAT (ECF; V-054-88)' Application to subdivide a 1.27 tract into six AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 1.(8)residential lots for future construction of single-family homes. Property Is located on 'i the north side of Sunset Avenue S.W., (Empire Way-South)between 80th and,81s Audrey Benner _,beingfirstdulyswornonoathstates Avenue. ` that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the t_ RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROV-+ AL(ECF;SA-084.88)(CONTINUED FROM r NOVEMBER 22,1988) • VALLEY DAILY NEWS HondaAppli ion forautom site plan dealership approval anew `Honda automobile dealership with con- • etruction of a two story building of steel and Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition glass, approximately 34,500 eq.ft. In size, Which will house offices, showroom, and Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers service bays.Property located at the north- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six west corner of Grady Way and Rainier Ave 'nue South. - months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published 5 Legal descriptions of the tiles noted .- in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King :above are on file in the Renton Community County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Development Department. ' ALL INTERESTED PERSONS YTOSAID newspaper by order of the Superior Court of th PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- King County. ' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN ,SENT AT°THE PUBLIC HEARING ON i,RENTON HEARING EXAMIN DECEMBER 20, 1988;Ar 9:00 A.M. TO •RENTON,WASHINGTON* . EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS.`" The notice in the exact form attached,was pub] A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELIt sy Published December 9, 1538 Valley Daily THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT News R5157 Acct.#51087 , Renton Edition _ X , Auburn Edit HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN- _ supplement form) which was regularly distri CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON,WASH- during the below stated period.The annexed not 'INGTON, ON DECEMBER 20, 1988, AT ! Notice of Public_Hearin 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOW- g ING PETITIONS: • was published on Ilacarnhe r .-9 FAITH COVENANT CHURCH COM- --19 8 8—--- , PLEX EXPANSION(ECF;CU-051-88) Applicant seeks to obtain a conditional use ',, permit to expand the church complex with The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing pu1-waitrorrsThe- sum of $ 36 .48 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 8 th day of Dec 19 8 8 lj-r-e% L Notary lic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VON#87 Revised 11,86 I(clka) • • • • • • NOTIC ° • ENVIRCNMENTA D RMINA ON • Environmental•.Review om i +ee AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Renton,Washin"c5Th The Environmental Review'Committee (ERC) has issued.i'Determination of Non- Audrey Benner ignificance-Mitlgatedforthefollowingpro- being first duly sworn on oath states ect(s) under the authority of the Renton that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the uniclpal Bode. T e fo to ing Applicant as completed p ',Upton process:t • VALLEY DAILY NEWS . RENTOW-FORDA Rigg ROI APPROV- AL • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Application`for site plan approval for a new (Honda automobile dealership with con- Daily newspapers published six(6) times a week.That said newspapers Astruction of a-two story building of.steel and glass, approximately 34;500 sq.ft. in size_ are legal newspapers and are now .and have been for more than six which will house offices, showroom; and months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published service bays. Property located at.the-_north • - in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kin west corner Co Grady Way-064- 8'`, Ave- gKent, g nue South.ECF-064-88,SA-Ofi4=88 ", County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Further information regarding this action newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building;,Renton;' . • King County. !Washington, 235-2550. This Determination ,is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal,period which will end at 5:00 PM on November 7, The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition ,1988. Any appeal of this decision;may be , Renton Edition , Auburn Edition 'made to the City's HearingExaminer, (and not in y' x 'Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers [Renton,Washington.An appeal must state • during the below stated period.The annexed notice a ,clearly, in.wring, why t - Deter „ ation hould be evis and l aer.A..mpa- Public Notice nied oya non-refundable$75.00 G111a fee. was published on October 24, 1 9 R f i p 513 Published. October;24, 1988 Val ey Daily News R51321{Accou t '51067 • The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the • • sum of $ n , 3 2 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 D th day of o c 1983 • Notar ublic for the State of Washington, ,• . residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 •• 41011 • • • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING • On the 441 day of 1\ l y- , 1988, I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing cr,r1� I F. documents. This information was sent to: NAME: REPRESENTING: 56 StalP Lan pyre Cln evprLse 1- - _ I • SIGNED BY: SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of \3 , 1988 . Notar Public in and Tor the State of Washington, residing at ` e hn, , therein. Project Name and Number: Re An koncla OF .A � Cs ° NDFCEz ti NOTICE p9grEo SEP'( ��P City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a '''. .: PUBLIC HEARING . in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON NOVEMBER 22, 1988. BEGINNING AT 9:0 .M. P.M. ECF-064-88, 'SA-064-88 CONCERNING: RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A NEW HONDA AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP WITH CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY BUILDING OF STEEL AND GLASS, APPROXIMATELY 34,500 SQ.FT. IN SIZE, WHICH WILL HOUSE OFFICES, SHOWROOM, AND SERVICE BAYS. FPUD 08G-4,84- R 1 I .• ,,:',, , \ , 11:n a _F'UD-d37.1.8� B_1 , ST„., ; . . .• y 4 c w ,...RR ( o• • SATE._ '_•'�J^ asx ' � i A : sw Cr?I -- , I % L_ , UIIICnt,.,— lllI ,.L , i1I}�I % 5 au OR1NK'ft/+ p I' • ��l� ,� .... \� \ER - l llMI f � 1 Ilo � f `;;, Ti0♦'j 1-IU"U tpqiIL �- t11.111110111101Ci� - .' �91 Uli I 0 U1 QU° �I II Iv.,1los „inJU ;�1 1W - - IIIDQlljIIII ' y: _ -_ _ _— ._ z E, II • — J _ _ I ) / ., I-_ — _ GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRADY WAY AND RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON 'BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT • PROPER AUTHORIZATION 6ERA.-/ • CERTIFICATION I , F, L►N)O , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT d�f� ( THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN �G62 1- • CUrIES OF PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ( 4 � CONSPICUOUS . ON IOy .iAjdqg .. . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, e Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in73?F�LJ; k2 , on the 1L/a • day of Isg� SIGNED : 0 r • O F R,� I • O A. U, . 9'0 z Nil (3 T 1 c E . p, z o • 9,0 O� O94 SEPS0, • City of Renton Land Use • Hearing Examiner will hold a i: ,. ,r 4I YlY • x •,6: ' ( v f i' II e HEARING . . p . • .. •., i In CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON NOVEMBER 22, 1988 BEGINNING AT 9: 0cA.M. P.M. ECF-064-88,' SA-064-88 ®N C E a" N I N G RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAp APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A NEW HONDA AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP WITH CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY BUILDING OF STEEL AND GLASS, APPROXIMATELY 34,500 SQ.FT. IN SIZE, WHICH WILL HOUSE • • OFFICES, SHOWROOM, AND SERVICE BAYS. • FPUD OP:- 8�1 :��O.tL�s _ i L R-1 y ` IF _FI'UD-037}-87 . —• .. . ,� ' --a - sw I•-•J ` s� t q� t ill p — . ri • O(L- StitJJECY. �_ �"�� 'L,N�. 1 �111111pll, I �• '-4 l i iili,i .� I ORjA �,i 1[L�UiIi • ��o��,� I T J�D_.-�r\'-r ,10 Wes'" LH 611101 a�j��1 I �� r. . . (11I1IIIIIU1 ailig u i . I111 �T 11� till n 1aI11 ..t f Il 11[[�r^ IIII �\ I ,1 T 'Holing] r it, _ " : . ,-----1. 7--L- L-1-T-• 1 1 ---'--- — - ---\:-)i-1:-.7L is f II _: •— �� I I �.�0 •.i,,e GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRADY WAY AND RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION I NOTItrOF PUBLIC REAFItNd RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON � A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY '6 .THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT c' HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN- "' CIL CHAMBERS ON THE 'SECOND '? FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON,WASH- AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION INGTON, ON NOVEMBER 22,'1988, AT 9:00 A,M.r70 CONSIDER:THE FOLLOW- ING PETITIONS:' ^ $' i ,`` Audrey Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath states METRO-SILVICULTURE ' { ECF;SA;SP-085-88A that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Development of a silviculture demonstra- r.4. tion to illustrate the effects of sludge fertiliz- .i er on tree growth through the planting of 1 Douglas fir(30,000 sq.ft.) and hybrid pop- VALLEY DAILY NEWS lays(75,000 sq.ft.) to show the differences ',1 • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition in growth rates between trees fertilized with Sew- sludge and those grown without sludge. Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers �'The property is located at the Renton Sew- age Treatment Plant at Oakesdale Avenue - are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six -and SW 7th Street. 010)1.,.? i months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published 1' RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROV- in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King 'ECF;SA064-88 3 County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Application for site plan approval for a new Honda fhbbile dealeratd .with con- il newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Xli it, `1 i,:;,,i:Gi .+-,k4, ,, King County. struction of a two story building of steel and glass, approximately 34,500 sq.ft. In size, 1 A. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition which will house offices, showroom, and , Renton Edition _ x , Auburn Edition , (and not in serve bays.The property is located at the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Avenue South. during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Legal descriptions of the files noted-:a. 'j above are on file in the Renton Community I Notice of P ub t i c Hearing Development Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID 1 was published on N o're rime r tt,_1 q l�k I' 141 PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- 'SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 22, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. 4 Published:NOVEMBER 11, 1988 Valley The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Daily Ne*$ 5141 Account#51067 sum of $ 32. 00. d/ :e. ,„-ef:?--a-- if- ,. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 5 tii day of Dec 19 88 P J i Not Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, A King County, Washington. 1 VON#87 Rev,sed 11i86 K i 1 c i i Ild/ho 4' 0 CITY OF RENTON "LL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION • December 6, 1988 • Bob Stalp Lanphere Enterprises 12520 S.W. Canyon Road Beaverton, OR 97005 RE: Renton Honda Site Plan ECF; SA-064-88 Dear Mr. Stalp: A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been continued from November 22, 1988 and is scheduled for December 20, 1988. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. jr_ Dona . Erickson, AIC Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp (cc: to Parties of Record on Page 2) • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Renton Honda Site Plan Approval (Continued from November 22, 1988) December 6, 1988 Page 2 cc: Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Company 10717 N.W. 4th Street, Suite 9 Bellevue, WA 98004 Eugene Horbach 827 - 108th N.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 Mrs. C. A. Staley PO Box 3407 Federal Way, WA 98063 Mrs. Edith Ballestrasse 201 S.W. 12th Street Renton, WA 98055 Curtis Beattie & Associates 3131 Elliot Avenue Building Seattle, WA 98121 J MPImilE'' Ill rvi crir 1 ,agir iiii .. • ,, • • . OI - 09,4TE0 SEP1°° j City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING . . in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON DECEMBER 20, 1988 BEGINNING AT 9.90_A.M• P•M• ECF-064-88, SA-064-88 CONCERNING• RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL (CONTINUATION FROM NOVEMBER 22, 1988) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A NEW HONDA AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP WITH CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY BUILDING OF STEEL AND GLASS, APPROXIMATELY 34,500 SQ.FT. IN SIZE, WHICH WILL HOUSE OFFICES, SHOWROOM, AND SERVICE BAYS. ll�l' s— -,' 1— s-\\ •/ '- �'. . V-1 11 1 Q I . :I j a I�.,v•., :.�'.,.,•...,�. 1 1---7::::::- ,I; 'yam L 1 I_ -- pc' "' I p0 1 1 1 I-,p, o1.'QI <i_t' usIIf IL Ieiar„„10. 1 I` rnq4 -U11 Bl I I NII!I I 11 111Jl l ( ��— ;` UIIUIUl 1/t 1a � a�plll I., l lyII P =1--I1,. t — - ( 3 4� Ip 1 •I If � I nllIIII d - - � I = - iil! Rill lIlllIlll:l.i, IUUIUIIU �i � - ,.3 s GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRADY WAY AND RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT .. PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I , ZERN1 T.. Liot,e, , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 'niR,EF1.3 , COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 11+PAS ( 3 , CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON E, C IgiY ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a ' Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington 1 residing in 1�(iM on the ��• SIGNED : .T. `JW:K. day of ��c/) tk_kr,cmv m 1. ,.r.- ) R � Z . • O9-•F0 SEP1s•-' City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a • I::114'':: '. IF i, . t S,.. ' r, HEAR, I IM G ., ,, . . „, 0, . .. •• in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL : ON DECEMBER 20, 1988 . BEGINNING AT 9 : 00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: ERENTON4HON, SSITE4P88 RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL .I (CONTINUATION FROM NOVEMBER 22 , 1988) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A NEW HONDA AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP WITH CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY BUILDING OF STEEL AND GLASS, APPROXIMATELY 34 , 500 SQ.FT. IN SIZE, WHICH WILL HOUSE OFFICES, • SHOWROOM, AND SERVICE BAYS. \-- — -.._._. n _t • .^P L :i l r SOP aACT / II?. • W ' I• , '. -� � -r.. - iII1011I.pII f , ; .L � pfii; IItmi` � 0!., ' 1 I � RSr� IIt91Gili tI � , \ ,.f 1oiY'liill1[ I iip ariin, ' 1vii orh u ..-- 1 i ' ,ioi Illo I„II n1 Ira • U � I � 113,/„A.A3: Imp ----- • _____ ' .\4 A- -.'f,':'..---1 -;---73 xi -_!::_il 4 • , II .._ram _ r,1 : - V • GENERAL LOCATION AND/DR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRADY WAY AND RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. • • • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT • • . = PROPER ,�: AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON NOVEMBER 22, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: METRO-SILVICULTURE ECF;SA;SP-085-88A Development of a silviculture demonstration to illustrate the effects of sludge fertilizer on tree growth through the planting of Douglas fir (30, 000 sq. ft. ) and hybrid poplars (75, 000 sq. ft. ) to show the differences in growth rates between trees fertilized with sludge and those grown without sludge. The property is located at the Renton Sewage Treatment Plant at Oakesdale Avenue and SW 7th Street. RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL . ECF;SA-064-88 Application for site plan approval for a new Honda automobile dealership with construction of a two story building of steel and glass, approximately 34,500 sq. ft. in size, which will house offices, showroom, and service bays. The property is located at the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 22, 1988, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. • Published: NOVEMBER ii, 1988 y- f ' . THE B L&YLOCK 'COMPANY specialists in,land-use procedures CITY OF REN ON E • November 4, 1988 Fft9 � tow $U)LDING/ZONING DEPT, Mr. Gary Norris , Traffic Engineer Department of Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Traffic Mitigation/Renton Honda " Dear Gary: • Thank you for meeting with Mr. Bob Lanphere, Mr. Bob Stalp, Mr. Duane Christie, and me on Monday afternoon to discuss and clarify the position of Traffic Engineering Division concerning traffic mitigation. It is our understanding that the following is the present position of the City: , 1. A signal warrant analysis must be completed for the intersection of SW Grady Way and Maple Avenue SW. to determine if a traffic signal is warranted at this time. (I contacted TRANSPO Tuesday morning to authorize them to conduct the street warrant analysis . Their preliminary response on Thursday was that the signal was not warranted because of the low traffic counts on Maple Avenue S.W. A separate letter will be directed to you for the official file from the TRANSPO GROUP. ) 2. Based upon the above conclusion reached by TRANSPO the issue of Lanphere Enterprises installing the traffic signal at this timeand subsequently the Traffic Engineering Division supporting our request for a latecomers ' agreement to the City Council becomes a moot issue. 3. We will participate in the Grady Way Traffic Benefit Area at the time of occupancy. It is our understanding that your original estimate of $197 per vehicle trip will probably be modified to approximately $65 based on the pending Benefit District Study before the City Council. The form of the payment can either be a bond, letter of credit, or cash. This will be decided prior to occupancy. 10717 NE Fourth Street, Suite 9 Bellevue, Washington 98004 - (206)455-155 0 Gary Norris Renton Honda Site Plan . November 4, 1988 Page 2 4. The estimate of traffic generation presented by TRANSPO in the original application has been accepted by the Traffic Engineering Division and for purposes of the cost participation we will use. the figure of 962 average daily trips. 5. Lanphere Enterprises will pay the estimated cost of $2, 080 to upgrade the street lighting level on S.W. Grady Way. ( 6. ) The site plan will be modified to provide 30 foot wide driveways instead of 24 feet shown on the original plans. 7 . The project will not impact either the intersection at S .W. Grady Way & Powell Ave. S.W. or S.W.7th Street & Hardie Ave. S.W. ; therefore we would not be involved in the present latecomers agreements with Holvick de Regt Koering. If the above points do not clearly address your understanding of the present agreement, I would appreciate an immediate response by Wednesday, November 9 , 1988 . The Community Development Department will be preparing the staff report for the public hearing before the Hearing Examiner on November 22, 1988 . Sincerely, RogerY. Blaylock cc. I/6on Erickson Bob Lanphere Bob Stalp Gene Horbach Curt Beattie 4$ 0 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION November 8, 1988 Bob Stalp Lanphere Enterprises 12520 S.W. Canyon Road Beaverton, OR 97005 RE: Renton Honda Site Plan Approval ECF;SA-064-88 • Dear Mr. Stalp: A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for November 22, 1988. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. in el • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp (cc: to interested parties on Page 2) 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Renton Honda Site Plan Approval Notice of Public Hearing November 8, 1988 Page 2 Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Company 10717 NW 4th Street, Suite 9 Bellevue, WA 98004 Eugene Horbach 827 - 108th NE Bellevue, WA 98004 Mrs. C. A. Staley PO Box 3407 Federal Way, WA 98063 Mrs. Edith Ballestrasse 201 SW 12th Street Renton, WA 98055 t OT IC E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-064-88, SA-064-88 APPLICANT RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A NEW HONDA AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP WITH CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY BUILDING OF STEEL AND GLASS, APPROX. 34,500 SQ.FT. IN SIZE, WHICH WILL HOUSE OFFICES, SHOWROOM, AND SERVICE BAYS. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRADY WAY AND RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. , POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. • COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., NOVEMBER 7, 1988 • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. • • DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. CERTIFICATION • I , Q R: L11u0 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I PKW ( 7) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN -11-1-R,6 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON OCIVe28N27, 1,91,gs ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, i mod for the State of Washington • residing in .9' /L) , on the ,g7ciA SIGNED : )€,JulAde. ultet day of od„J Cj oT1 E ENVIRoNMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-064-88, SA-064-88 APPLICANT RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A NEW HONDA AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP WITH CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY BUILDING OF STEEL AND GLASS, APPROX. 34 , 500 SQ. FT. IN SIZE, WHICH WILL HOUSE OFFICES, SHOWROOM, AND SERVICE BAYS. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRADY WAY AND RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES Ira DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT I I WILL XZWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., NOVEMBER 7 , 1988 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicant has completed a mitigation process: RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL Application for site plan approval for a new Honda automobile dealership with construction of a two story building of steel and glass, approximately 34,500 sq. ft. in size, which will house offices, showroom, and service bays. Property located at the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. ECF-064-88, SA-064-88 Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5: 00 PM on November 7, 1988 . Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City' s Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. Published:October 24, 1988 ui 21 3 4i 0 CITY OF RENTON ..LL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION October 20, 1988 Bob Stalp Lanphere Enterprises 12520 S.W. Canyon Road Beaverton, OR 97005 RE: Renton Honda Site Plan ECF-064-88, SA-064-88 Dear Mr. Stalp: This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the above referenced project. No comments were received. The Committee' s determination is final and may be appealed to the City' s Hearing Examiner no later than 5: 00 p.m. on November 7, 1988 . Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, S-rncerel• , • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp (cc: to interested parties on Page 2) 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 r - Renton Honda Site Plan ECF; SA-064-88 October 20 Page 2 cc: Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Company 10717 NW 4th Street, Suite 9 Bellevue, WA 98004 Eugene Horbach 827 - 108th NE Bellevue, WA 98004 Mrs. C. A. Staley PO Box 3407 Federal Way, WA 98063 Mrs. Edith Ballestrasse 201 SW 12th Street Renton, WA 98055 3mETRD LETTL OF TRANSMITTAL, Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle DATE FILE/CONTRACT NO. ExchangeBl�d�g.•821 Second Ave., ®er /7/ /.9 e' Seattle,Wallington 98104 TO ATT NTION OS REGARDING ,� TO: C�/Ty �i= r��.�T©/J Fni S�lE .4)2- effo� ,EL'/ Ty ��'dEGO�•G1��✓T £1 r: � ,rJ.rJiuG ��/is�o•� �i��ir/�rrl .0pp49- ,1 ' /9vJNv� WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING JE ATTACHED ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER COPIES DATE DRWG.NO. DESCRIPTION PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON OCT 1 9 1988 Ullfl THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: ❑ FOR APPROVAL ❑ FOR YOUR USE AND INFORMATION is,AS REQUESTED ❑ FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ❑ OTHER: REMARKS • SIGN TUBE TITL/�� ^, DII�ON�6: 5L?_ /7 l/ zit �✓ �:_./v F/ c. !� 029 (Re /78) ` ' �l %o '� CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: October 14, 1988 TO: Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer FROM: Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator l7' RE: Location of Sidewalk on North Side of Grady Way Adjacent to Proposed Renton Honda Dealership This memo is to confirm a decision reached in our phone conversation yesterday afternoon. At the time, I was meeting with Roger Blaylock on the proposed Renton Honda Dealership site. Part of that discussion included a discussion of the City's roadway improvements proposed along the north side of Grady Way. As you will recall, I asked you whether or not the sidewalk could be moved adjacent to the Renton Honda Dealership property line instead of adjacent to the street curb so that pedestrian' s would not be walking adjacent to the roadway and to enable the placement of a landscaping strip between the sidewalk and the curb. My understanding is that this was possible and will be incorporated into the roadway improvement plans. Based on our conversation, I have adsked Mr. Blaylock to redesign the site plan for the dealership to reflect this understanding. Please call me if you feel I misunderstood you yestersday. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 -::R1ETRO- „ 6,0 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 October 4, 1988 �1 OCT 6 1988 Environmental Review Committee c/o Donald Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-Significance File No. : ECF-064-88 Renton Honda Site Plan Approval Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments. Wastewater Treatment Facilities This project could conflict with Metro's Eastside Interceptor Sewer, Section 1. The location of this sewer on and near the (;iproosed projp ect site is shown on the attachedd drawings. The i project proponent should contact Mr. Jim Hawthorn of Metro's Engineering Services Division at 684-1303 before beginning construction to ensure that the project will not adversely affect the Eastside Interceptor. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, _ _ <AL G . Bush, Ma ager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsg . M THE BLAYLOCK COMPANY specialists in land-use procedures y October 4, 1988 I :. f,', k ' It; f, I' Mr. Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Community Development Department f .. : i City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL ECF-064-88/ SA-064-88 Dear Mr. Erickson: Lanphere Enterprises offers the following comments concerning the Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance as issued by the Environmental Review Committee on September 14, 1988 . Condition #1. The property is located in a commercial/industrial area. The way that the condition is stated suggests that hours of construction can only be from 8 :30 to 3 : 30 Monday thru Friday. This would appear to prevent construction on weekends. We would request that the language be changed to limit -off-site hauling by construction vehicles from the hours of 6:30 a.m. to 8 :30 a.m. and from 3:30 p.m. toc6:_60T p.m. Monday thru Friday. Conditions #2, 3, and 4. Are acceptable and will be complied with during construction. Condition #5. Includes numerous traffic related improvements. Coordination of Access Points . The site plan as submitted limits access onto Grady Way to two points. One access would align with the extension of Maple Avenue S.W. We have specifically combined access to the three legal lots to only two points to lessen traffic impacts. We do not believe any further modifications are necessary. 10717 NE Fourth Street,Suite 9 • Bellevue,Washington 98004 • (206)455-1550 /rxr/ . RENTON HONDA ECF-064-88/ SA-064-88 October 4, 1988 page 2 Signalization. We assume signalization is meant for the intersection of S.W. Grady Way and Maple Avenue S.W. However, contacting the Traffic Engineering Division, we have discovered that first a a Traffic Warrant Analysis for the intersection was requested with possible bonding for installation. Lanphere Enterprises conducted a preliminary meeting on April 10, 1988 with the City of Renton to determine issues. The greatest concern was traffic and access. We were told that a traffic analysis was not necessary since the area had been so intensively studied and the actual physical improvement were known. At the suggestion of the City we accepted the idea of a traffic signal at the intersection of Maple Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way. The site plan was redesigned 3 times to reflect input we received from the City in April and May. Discovering that a two way left turn is now proposed by the Traffic Engineering Division confuses us and we are concerned that our whole site plan may be inappropriate. We agreed with several City Department heads 6 months ago that signalization of Maple and Grady was critical and we wanted to install the traffic signal, which would be charged against our area wide improvement participation. Yet, the Mitigated DNS does not require participation in the Grady Way Traffic Benefit Area plan. We had assumed substantial participation based on our traffic generation of approximately 960 daily vehicle trips. It seems very odd that the City is turning down a developer who wants to install improvements. In addition, Traffic Engineering had requested a trip generation analysis considering impacts on the intersections of (1) S.W. Grady Way and Powell Ave. S.W. and (2) S.W. 7th Street and Hardie Ave. S.W. to consider our proportionate share in latecomer' s agreements for those intersections. At this time it does not appear that our project would have any impacts on S.W. 7th. Street. The cost of paying back these late comer agreements should have been included in the area wide fees. RENTON HONDA ECF-064-88/ SA-064-88 October 4, 1988 page 3 Creation of Right-in/Right-out Routings. Again we were told in April that we would be limited to right-in/right-out access for the eastern access point; that a two way left turn lane was impossible. The only right turns would be allowed at the signalized intersection of S.W. Grady Way and Maple Avenue S.W. Now the City seems to be requiring that we redesign again. Condition #6. The present site plan shows pedestrian circulation around the building and out to the public sidewalk along Grady Way. Condition #7. We will provide a specific exterior lighting plan at the time of building permit application. Condition #8. As a result of the configuration of the new street improvements proposed by the City for S.W. Grady Way, it is impossible to provide any lawn areas between the sidewalk and curb along the eastern portion of the site. Along the western two-thirds of the site a gradually increasing area can be devoted to lawn. Because of the shape and width, berming of the area is not reasonable. We would anticipate the same disaster that occurred along S.W. 43rd Street with maintenance. We believe that the vertical streetscape that we are proposing with the introduction of larger street trees is more important to create a positive image. Condition #9. Our present plans call for the creation of an 18 inch berm on the first 10 feet of the subject site. This is where we intended to create the vertical streetscape. We believe that an 18 inch berm above the sidewalk grade would be sufficient to screen the automobiles and act as the suggested 15" high decorative screen. However, we believe after discussions with Mr. Jerry Lind that a 24 inch berm could be used that would still allow visibility of the new car dealership and provide the intended streetscape. RENTON HONDA ECF-064-88/ SA-064-88 October 4, 1988 page 4 Condition #10. We believe that this condition may be misstated. The original request we had from the City in preliminary meeting in March was to provide room to widen Rainier Avenue to allow the City to create a new right turn lane. We believed this would be part of the S.W. Grady Way project. Since the dedication was not obtained as part of the original short platting of the property and it is not critical to any construction on the site, it must be a necessary area wide and the value of the land should be charge against our area wide participation. Thank you for the opportunity to submit comments. Sincerely, Ro er J. Blaylock • • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING • On the G / day of 5096442 1988, I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing 4documents. This information was sent to: NAME: REPRESENTING: • 1p-r- of e-d-ez_06-1 en Paha° Sc- T-7•0741 Ai -i 4 -, r L/6 M440 Gib Liz c-16 - 6r- • -PErs--eRy M 6ks# erkid -05AV 6-7)/E-A-) bePr uM/DLi PC SIGNED BY: / SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me his c - day of , fJ7M � , 1988 . Notary Public in and f r the State of Washington, residing at P , therein. Project Name and Number 6 6 m/d , D 4- longaz. t-C r 6 ,(6�f.-Fr 6&-(A)6- 162 13 CIF F 7 QD/i Pu&_Jc ST i?4 6ZF- a-aa 4a X7 WY D /t y GlA`.D ti F- vm-fie City of Renton 200 Mill, Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 : W . State Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Planning Division City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue :South Renton, WA 98055 Mr . Gerald Marbett Bldg . & Land Development Div . King Co. Administration Bldg Seattle, WA ' 98104 City of Renton 200 _Mi11 Avenue South: Renton. WA . 93055 Joe Robe's Habitat . Management Director Rm . 115, M/S AX-11 Olympia. WA 98504 City of Renton 200 .Mi11 Avenue . South Renton, WA 98055 Gregory M. Bush/ Manager Environmental Review Section METRO 821 - 2nd Avenue. M/S 92 Seattle. WA 98104 3 .Planning Division City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 ,. Department of Wildlife 16018 Mill Creek Blvd. Mill Creek. WA 98012 4% : � CITY OF RENTON i��11 Fi' POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor September 19, 1988 Bob Stalp Lanphere Enterprises 12520 S. W. Canyon Road Beaverton, OR 97005 Re: Renton Honda Site Plan ECF-064-88, SA-064-88 Dear Mr. Stalp: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated and the Mitigated Measures for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. S' v Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Company • 10717 N.W. 4th Street, Suite 9 Bellevue, WA 98004 Eugene Horbach 827 - 108th N.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 di • r C$ CITY OF RENTON sal ,. POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor September 16, 1988 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations issued on September 14, 1988. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL Application for site plan approval for a new Honda automobile dealership with construction of a two story building of steel and glass, approximately 34,500 sq. ft. in size, which will house offices, showroom, and service bays. Property located at the northwwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. ECF-064-88, SA-064-88 BOEING 4-42 BUILDING Application to use a portion of the existing 4-42 building to paint sections of commercial aircraft. Property located in the Boeing Industrial Area (approximately 250 ft. east of Cedar River and 500 feet south of Lake Washington). ECF-072-88 RENTON/HARDIE PUBLIC STORAGE Application for a conditional use permit to allow a self-storage facility on 1.95 acre parcel of property. Approximately 500 individual storage spaces will be constructed in a two-story, 52,400 sq. ft. building. In addition, a manager's unit will be located on the second floor. Property located between Hardie Avenue S.W. and Maple Avenue S.W. at the 400 block. ECF-060-88, CU-060-88 The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on October 4,1988. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 Environmental Determin.......ls September 16, 1988 Page 2 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE EXTENDED FAMILY CHILDCARE CENTER Application to permit the use of an existing structure in a commercial zone as a day care center to serve a maximum of sixty (60) children, supported by a maximum of eleven (11) staff members on a 1.15 acre site. Property is located at 200 South 2nd Street. ECF-088-88 The Determinations are final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on October 3, 1988. Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. ly, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries DKE:mjp CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-064-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-064-88 PROPONENT: Lanphere Enterprises DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval for a new Honda automobile dealership with construction of a two story building of steel and glass, approximately 34, 500 sq. ft. in size, which will house offices, showroom, and service bays. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property is located at the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probably significant adverse impact on the environmental. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminay site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from September 20, 1988. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , October 4, 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official ; Environmental Review Committee Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: September 19, 1988 DATE OF DECISION: September 14, 1988 SIGNATURES: . /l Ronald G.- Nelson Larry Springer Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director Le-14/ Richard C Houghton Public Works Director • T- DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-064-88 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-064-88 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval for a new Honda automobile dealership with construction of a two story building of steel and glass, approximately 34,500 sq. ft. in size, which will house offices, showroom, and service bays. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the ERC issue a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated- with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant shall be required to limit off-site hauling by construction vehicles to the hours between 8:30 AM and 3 : 30 PM Monday through Friday. 2 . That the applicant shall be required to provide wheel washing for all trucks before those vehicles enter the roadway from the construction site in order to minimize tracking of dust and debris from the site. Deterni nation of Non-Signiance-Mitigated Mitigation Measures Renton Honda Site Plan Approval Page 2 3. That the applicant shall provide a bond in the amount of $2, 000. 00 for street cleaning. 4 . That the applicant shall develop a plan for erosion control subject to approval by the Public Works Department, to protect the subject parcel and surrounding properties from damage resulting from erosion of the site during construction operations. 5. That the applicant shall provide a revised plan, redesigning and relocating access points to the site via Grady Way, including, but not limited to, coordination of access points, signalization, _ creation of right-in/right-out routings. These improvements should be subject to approval by the Police Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Design Engineering Division, and Traffic Engineering Divisions of the City of Renton. 6. That the applicant shall provide a revised plan which includes pedestrian linkages from the site to the sidewalks surrounding the site, and to adjacent properties. 7 . That the applicant shall provide a plan for controlling exterior lighting to ensure that glare is directed away from adjacent properties and public rights-of- way. 8. That the applicant shall provide bermed lawn areas between the street curb and sidewalk areas to visually soften the site and provide a protection buffer between motorists and pedestrians. Deterkip Lion of Non-Signif' -'ince-Mitigated Mitigation Measures Renton Honda Site Plan Approval Page 3 9. That all parking areas adjacent or near to street property lines shall have decorative visual buffers to screen the lower portions of parked cars. (Note: a minimum of 15" high decorative screen is suggested. ) 10. That the applicant designate the right turn lane on Grady Way on the site plan approval. mmdoc i TICE' ENVI ' MENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-064-88, SA-064-88 APPLICANT BOB STALP, LANPHERE ENTERPRISES • PROPOSED ACTION APPLLCATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A NEW • • %) HONDA AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP WITH CONSTRUCTION OF A 2 STORY BUILDING OF STEEL AND GLASS, APPROXIMATELY 34,500 SQ. FT. IN SIZE, WHICH WILL HOUSE OFFICES, SHOWROOM, AND SERVICE BAYS. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRADY WAY AND RAINER AVENUE SOUTH. • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL ^WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY OCTOBER 4, 1Q&8 4 , AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. CERTIFICATION • I , Q1 ZIZ I . LIh1� , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT `ri4g COPIES • THE ABOVE OCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN � � OF �NJt. (3) CONSPICUOUS . PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington • residing In RE ti ()k) , on the .T day of �•Pr (sic .SIGNED : � . � 1 . eit i': ENVIRONMENTAL DECLAA ATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-064-88, SA-064-88 APPLICANT BOB STALP, LANPHERE ENTERPRISES PROPOSED ACTION APPL]CATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A NEW HONDA AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP WITH CONSTRUCTION OF A 2 STORY BUILDING OF STEEL AND GLASS, APPROXIMATELY 34, 500 SQ. FT. IN SIZE, WHICH WILL HOUSE OFFICES, SHOWROOM, AND SERVICE BAYS. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS • PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRADY WAY AND RAINER AVENUE SOUTH. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMNTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY OCTOBER 4 , 88 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M.., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- ' jects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. Rua r ey Be nn e r ,being first duly sworn on oath states AL RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROV- that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Application for site plan approval for a new Honda automobile dealership with con- struction of a two story building of steel and VALLEY DAILY NEWS glass, approximately 34,500 sq. ft. in size, which will house offices, showroom, and • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition service bays. Property located at the north- west corner of Grady Way and Rainir Ave- nue South. ECF-064-88,SA-064-88 Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers BOEING 4-42 BUILDING are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Application to use a portion of the existing months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published 4-42 building to paint sections of commer cial aircraft. Property located in the Boeing- in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Industrial Area (approximately 250 ft. east County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal of Cedar River and 500 feet south of Lake Washington). ECF-072-88 newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for RENTON/HARDIE PUBLIC STORAGE King County. Application for a conditional use permit to allow a self-storage facility on 1.95 acre parcel of property. Approximately 500 indi- The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition vidual storage spaces will be constructed in Renton Edition Auburn Edition not in a two-story, 52,400 sq. ft. building. In addi- X (andtion, a manager's unit will be located supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers between Hardie Avenue S.W. and Maple Avenue S.W. at the 400 block.ECF-060-88, during the below stated period.The annexed notice a CU-060-88 Public Notice This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., was published on September 19 , 1988 :25111 October 4, 1988 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will com- mence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Committee are available at the Planning Division of the Community Development sum of $ 3 3 •44 • Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055,.Phone:235-2550. Published:SePtember 19, 1988 Valley Daily News R5111 Account#51067 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 thday of Sept 1988 • Notar ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 It NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following , ..projects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. )(RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL Application for site plan approval for a-"rfew Honda automobile dealership with construction of a two story building of steel and glass, approximately 34,500 sq. ft. in size, which will house offices, showroom, and service bays. Property located at the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. ECF-064-88, SA-064-88 BOEING 4-42 BUILDING Application to use a portion 'of , the existing 4-42 building to paint sections of commercial aircraft. Property located in the Boeing Industrial Area (approximately 250 east of Cedar River and 500 feet south of Lake Washington) . ECF-072-88 RENTON/HARDIE PUBLIC STORAGE Application for a conditional use permit to allow a self-storage facility on 1. 95 acre parcel of property. Approximately 500 individual storage spaces will be constructed in a two-story, 52,400 sq. ft. building. In addition, a manager's unit will be located on the second floor. Property located between Hardie Avenue S.W. and Maple Avenue S.W. at the 400 block. ECF-060-88, CU-060-88 This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5: 00 p.m. , October 4, 1988 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of ''a DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's *Environmental Review Committee are available at the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055, . Phone: 235-2550. Published: September 19, 1988 City of Renton Environmental Review Committee MEETING NOTICE September 9, 1988 To: Larry Springer Mike Parness Dick Houghton Ron Nelson Glen Gordon From: Don Erickson, Secretary Meeting Date: September 14, 1988 Time: 10:00 AM Location: Third Floor Conference Room 1,1 Agenda attached below. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA SEPTEMBER 14, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 AM TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL ECF-064-88, SA-064-88 Application for site plan approval for a new Honda automobile dealership with construction of a two story building of steel and glass, approximately 34,500 sq. ft. in size, which will house offices, showroom, and service bays. Property located at the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. BOEING 4-42 BUILDING ECF-072-88 Application to use a portion of the existing 4-42 building to paint sections of commercial aircraft. Property located in the Boeing Industrial Area (approximately 250 feet east of Cedar River and 500 feet south of Lake Washington). • ERC Meeting September 13, 1988 Page 2 RENTON/HARDIE PUBLIC STORAGE ECF-060-88, CU-060-88 Application for a conditional use permit to allow a self-storage facility on 1.95 acre parcel of property. Approximately 500 individual storage spaces will be constructed in a two-story, 52,400 sq. ft. building. In addition, a manager's unit will be located between Hardie Avenue S.W. and Maple Avenue S.W. at the 400 block. DISCUSSION 16TH STREET BRIDGE Application for special permit to allow the removal of approximately 3,300 cu. yds. of material as part of the S.W. 16th St. improvement project. Thepart? of project includes the removal of the existing S.W. 16th St. bridge and replacement with a reinforced concrete box culvert. The street is to be reconstructed as a 3 lane roadway with turning lanes at the Oakesdale intersection. Utility improvements include storm and water mains. A substantial shorelines development permit is also applied for as said development is within 200 ft. of Springbrook Creek. Located on S.W. 16th Street from Lind Avenue to Longacres Drive. Note: The purpose of this discussion is to review an environmental checklist for an application to construct a temporary storage structure for excavated material. The structure is proposed to be in place for the duration of the above noted 16th Street Bridge project. • I` , 1 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 10:00 A.M. Renton Municipal Building September 14, 1988 3rd Floor Conference Room MINUTES ATTENDING: Ron Nelson, Building Director, Dick Houghton, Public Works Director; Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator; Camille Walls, Fire Prevention; Ken Nyberg, Acting Public Works Deputy Director, Margaret Pullar, Secretary. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Mr. Erickson. NEW PROJECTS: RENTON IIONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL Application for site plan approval for a new llonda automobile dealership with construction of a two story building of steel and glass, approximately 34,500 sq. ft. in size, which will house offices, showroom, and service bays. Property located at the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. ECF-064-88, SA-064-88 DECISION: Following a review of the proposal site and the staff report, Mr. Nelson made a motion, seconded by Mr. Houghton, to accept the staff recommendations, to add Item No. 10 requiring the applicant to designate the right turn lane on Grady Way on the site plan approval, and to issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the ten conditions as noted. The motion carried. BOEING 4-42 BUILDING ECF-072-88 Application to use a portion of the existing 4-42 building to paint sections of commercial aircraft. Property located in the Boeing Industrial Area (approximately 250 feet east of Cedar River and 500 feet south of Lake Washington). DECISION: Mr. Erickson reviewed the proposal and briefly explained the proposed interior modifications. Ile noted modifications were expected to reduce hazardous air emissions by more than 1.5 tons a year. Mr. Nelson made a motion, seconded by Mr. Houghton, to accept the Staff recommendations for a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated. The motion carried. RENTON/IIARDIE PUBLIC STORAGE BUILDING ECF-060-88, CU-060-88 Application for a conditional use permit to allow a self-storage facility on 1.95 acre parcel of property. Approximately 500 individual storage spaces will be constructed in a two-story, 52,400 sq. ft. building. In addition, a manager's unit will be located between Hardie Avenue S.W. and Maple Avenue S.W. at the 400 block. DECISION: Mr. Erickson reviewed the project site and proposal. A lengthy discussion followed regarding I) whether or not this proposal was an appropriate use for a B-1 zone; 2) the type of proposed construction uses plaster board and metal studs rather than concrete tilt-up walls; 3) the City's inability to control secondary storage of hazardous material in the units; 4 bonding requirements; 5) the City's potential liability and responsibility relating to a dual key lock system for inspection of material storage; 6) impervious membranes for the flooring of the buildings; and 7) the location of a nearby archaeological site and the potential investigation of archaeological finds on this particular site. Mr. Nelson made a motion, seconded by Mr. loughton, to accept the Staff recommendations and issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following changes and additions to the proposed conditions: Item 1c) add the condition that the plan for an impervious flooring membrane will be enforced by the Planning Department; Item le) delete; Item 1 f) add the amount of the bond at $250,000 to $300,000, and the additional language "or other means of bonding approved by the City Attorney"; Add Item 8) That the applicant be required to obtain a written statement of approval from the • ERC Minutes September 14, 1988 Page 2 Washington State Archaelogical and Historic Preservation Department Society to construct on site due to potential archaeological finds and that the applicant be advised to notify the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, acting on behalf of the Duwamish Indian Tribe, regarding the potential archaeological site. The motion carried. EXTENDED FAMILY CIIILDCARE CENTER ECF-088-88 Application to permit the use of an existing structure in a commercial zone as a day care center to serve a maximum of sixty (60) children, supported by a maximum of eleven (11) staff members on a 1.15 acre site. Project development will require interior remodeling of the structure to meet State and local standards for a day care center. It also will require location of a play area in an existing parking area, and removal of parking to a new undeveloped section of the parcel. The property is located.at 200 South 2nd Street. DISCUSSION: Mr. Erickson reviewed the proposal and located the site. He noted that this remodel and change of use application had not been routed for environmental review because the reviewer thought it was exempt. Because other departments had signed off on it at the building permit stage and because time was of the essence, it had been brought directly to TAC and ERC. It was noted for the record that at times there may be excessive noise outdoors due to plane activity in the area and that there is a potential hazard in this location since it is so near the airport. It was noted that there was an incident last year when a plane landed in the high school play field near the vicinity of the subject sit. Following a discussion of the use, and the site as it relates to the nearby airport, Mr. Nelson made a motion, seconded by Mr. Houghton, to accept the Staff recommendations for a Determination of Non-Significance. The motion carried. DISCUSSION 16TH STREET BRIDGE Application for special permit to allow the removal of approximately 3,300 cu. yds. of material as part of the S.W. 16th Street improvement project. The project includes the removal of the existing S.W. 16th Street bridge and replacement with a reinforced concrete box culvert. The street is to be reconstructed as a 3 lane roadway with turning lanes at the Oakesdale intersection. Utility improvements include storm and water mains. A substantial shorelines development permit is also applied for as said development is within 200 ft. of Springbrook Creek. Note: The purpose of this discussion is to review an environmental checklist for an application to construct a temporary storage structure for excavated material. The structure is proposed to be in place for the duration of the above noted project. DISCUSSION: Mr. Erickson reviewed the project history with regard to DOE requirements. Ile noted that the City Council has authorized a study to evaluate compliance to existing regulations. Mr. Houghton indicated that the temporary storage structure would be in place approximately 6 months maximum. Ms. Walls was asked to discuss the location of the temporary storage site with Jim Matthews, Deputy Chief, to determine site approval. All agreed that the proposal for the temporary storage structure presented no apparent problems. RECONSIDERATION RIVERTECH ASSOCIATES - NACHES CENTER ECF-056-88, SA-056-88, SM-056-88 Application for site plan approval to allow the development of Naches Center consisting of three buildings: a 3 story office building of 67,000 sq. ft. and 2 one story office/R&D • .buildings with 28,000 sq. ft. and 23,000 sq. ft., respectively. DISCUSSION: Mr. Erickson reviewed the site plan and area noting that DOE is contesting the proposed development of a segregated parcel. He noted that the following letters were received during the comment period: 1) LPN Architecture and Planning, applicant's architect; 2) Department of Ecology; 3) Marty Murphy, Half Moon Bay, Co.; 4) Gerald Adams, Seattle Audubon Society; 5) Department of Wildlife; and 6) Mary M. Anderson. Discussion followed regarding the information contained in the comment letters and the memo Mr. Erickson submitted outlining new and revised conditions for the project. It was agreed to hold the discussion over to the next meeting so that ERC members could effectively review the information submitted. It was also agreed that Staff should attempt to obtain verification of the DOE stop work orders which are referred to in their letter, and that Mr. Erickson would schedule a meeting with the developer, Mr. Schuman, to discuss the status of the project. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 11:45 AM. 1, 1 •FPUD O% 84- `-�' L. R-1 ►,, `, • • ._FOUD-a3_ 7• 1- s1 - • _B-=1 .. '\ . ' s w. t -r Tom. L •ST 3 I .^ . - r I a • m — I I \ , 1 i I yamf 4 1 • 'D 144 i IQ �,� I 1 F d, - , ��' I in i 11 _______— c, -lc _ • I, L____�N�RN-�9- 5ic ill -,. i . 1111011„_. i��OV .� . rjOR s A1 `.�' - I NO. 1 •''1 1M IIIIIl —�� Ns_... . _______ , ram• ,� �R-1•1. H 1690111111 111111 _,: 1 1 III MN `II ri-c! �� `'`A 'lllUl...Milo N. . Il, I -- . ,.3,=1 Q 0111011ir , :. ---- -. - 1 , . , /.4TJUL' \ 1o•—' 1 , -- wa 1 77 !! 1 lIII1i11JJJ�-1J��---111 •�.-��,. -I.!J 1., I I I I I,W i Il )1 N , - _ �./^i 1l ill W • • .7IF-7;i' • - t. 90 7Q LY 7 - -- _- Q In I :: „ ..\ ` xf,t 1n 1 RENTON HONDA qe4 • SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-064-88 lki APPLICANT BOB STALP (LAMPHERE ENTERPRISES) TOTAL AREA 4.09 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. GRADY WAY . EXISTING ZONING B-1, BUSINESS USE EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE NEW CAR DEALERSHIP COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMERCIAL COMMENTS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH AND S.W. GRADY WAY. . . ' . . • -. . . .• , - . . .•---• . . .. ..: _ ...-_. ... _. . ...-.-.. .. . . . . .... ..-.- . . • • ..j,.. CITY OF TIENTO:4 I'Ici, • • rniii El N 1 i.l.:: ' '' • AUG 1 2198s J--'. .. ,.. . . 1 —'-•ii . BUIL ING/ZONliwz i,9 ,.., .,•,,,•••.•...- _--•1 a••,,,,,, •"'" 0....„.r..e„, ,/ .! , • • .........., ; fe, --- ' , • _ . , engu. ,,..y.1..Isusspev”comms..11.es.ti. vegge66 • , 0 I 14,9i—r-ri ....-- , .‘. .,. -7 L __;1_ --,,,,,,,L.,..., -,, =,,,,.77.7,___.7,7______ . ”_;,7.. . / -..-..., •fl` .,_. .• I I filf-I-InTo- Parts and Servoce Sales .1.I'1.1.1 r'1,-.t 1:1i;-,ii:,111:1' -''"' A .. * k l' fii...if.f . . --1 . a • :11W I 1 I I I 1::1:11:1-.1•11"I''''./ —1 •••• /-..:• / -..:4, .--1 •=i..,..•craZo•-•Irt , -, [4' --, Las•-•••••"awn, r.a . I Ort...7=C..,Irv, / „...../IL34'it•'1,11_ ,.., _ / , _ [ A 1 ILIJ,d, r,.., ., , , -,.1 , I I , 1.,.....„...!„,i,„.,,,„2,4./ ! . I Li.' 1111 ,,,:,, ''''''..:1-:11'1'-ic -_ -0:7.1'7.'1' .-,, . . • • ,...„-,z,,.,,,,„,„—. , /, __• ________ .q, . lig 1 1 _L..._— _.._..____ _,.....T,_.---. ___ , ______.____ _...j.,.....„,,__.__--___—-—-.__.___....._,47;,r.i_. , ..! ..-- E.......,-......-r— '',/- •0../7715.7•YE / 1.1(qr / 1 r...... r‘r=I e‘1.4 fr :I'.1; IE.*CO•Sa.,zoix=41. f.,Fg s ae rs • „...--/ ......1.0.....•......I n.0,, --...\ ..---"—/-1.1tt ann•eir'err / Gan..err,*.......,,,, 0 0// ' g:.-...,-,.....•,Ai. ,...... - _, p;ruc.,,....s,......._....,, gli,.rtrmrt .......•......1. ‘r 71 Icc•TED VI a..........5 f.•••••/./W,,,,, .4, 1 i lit r-----"'" UR Y.2.1Z.121.5PUY 1 , ,14.}.6_16. // IL. ,.,--.•;, . A ci.- f i ' •- - AIWSIBirdlli r ...... 11-111.11f*Mi I Wil I 1 IIIM'S.I I i r- 41.VI 11111k =116 MP.% ___,' 4 6, , yr - ler lir 710.111,1 - w w w "......-EN-rrEre WYE,*fir0 fl, a . Ilir 11, 11., AIIMMILW _AMMINEFANN=LY/MNIMK_ Tar .----- ,. , ._ a. ' IS/ 0.41 ' •-•5..:',/. r ir•s, • - TW:0-' '0 • - ., .. • ;,;-,i., 'SW GradY WaY. •,- . t'ke5 1.1 •-,.-c".:.:Si • • . . . I1,f..f... r.•.-...•.:..-_...-1.' e Plan . • .. • . ....._..- . .• .•. • • • • • KEY. • .. • = q,3 ..I.. I , 5I1 --7,..1 • •. . 1-- . • wo, 44 • . --gr-A . ...i---,‘\ • . ., . f -, =------..efg ..........., 1- °,- N„,,-\/N/\./N/\/\/,,,,,\/\/‘ . . . . _ ..,. ___ ... .. — . • 's- ? ,.. • . . _I, • .... . • . . .,-.''.. t':-. . • . • e.....C.,e1,1 . , — i ....o.c.- . el......o ecl..L...) , • „ 1 . ..v.-.4 1 : L'..•••••<—\"'"' ,,,_2..-..t. / ,,,,,,.e. i 11 -- .r,i• '. 1„,.. /-1...............4 .. 7_71L,... V to- . • •• I..1. ,- • :L.L,,.. ia..-0 I "--o, i • . • • ,4-... . -••-1 0-...' r • . ._ *1-. Site Section A—A' 46.1,ve......d • ' t . '0 > . . .... .. • • • UILDING USE TYPE • • • . -. • r - 'Site Statistics . • —...... -.01 E • ' ' • —1__[ • . .. • B • i .r.s..c..= • .. ...,.... . . Ey.........:7:. • Ictii a _ . . . . • . A AUTO SALES {as 1r lr a 2.••rirn En CIE>a•Ese Eiect M.ie.Ete-Eor • • . -.. , Er.... r E.• t•I..HOTEL , Ewer.......E .ry cr=aatn,a wow.,tr.•;extra I in . R-SETAIL • • , Z TErEE,Nen Ed EreacrE•rs Lee n...cr.mac.tEr•rea.erE tem•zerEmac lal 0 -.,r0 . C-CONEIERCIAL . il E. .' ,. mar of•••..I.En E.E,reffEwErn EEL,s•rErr s tam.•.x.,esclhal me • E.neva wawa Eara• .c M... 0-OM./31.04 • • Eameac••• . ,17,11 17-- --:-:•.;,. IA-WAREHOUSE . H 1 .1-1 ,,,, ...y.....rrE,...,...qr.,EE.E...,,E,...p.p....,procc.c;en•ra E•g• • r . . ..‘,...... 101 ff• ...1,.. 05-OUTDOOR STORAGE ''''''''r17.17.V."'"?'.t''"erf.j.511.7er"'"'''-'of .E:E%a a iii ."' • • • 0-00PLE1 ' 1 " I . Zavg,sale 001ei 111,0.11110•••Linn ce hiEfEEEE PErla Ammo. . • . •••• I- urea.noted Gorr* . i. laVIRgibil ''' I -/ .. EE.,,,,rm..,arLIA treLne alma lytr•en er•secctrEarn.ma mow wall*...Err Ea..eirls•Eur;I.Ewe vials ,— — '. m® tl"..t==..zi— la Ft t . • • • F . • . - -- .., i .,,,[1:•d'":„7.1....7..,,,,........9''LTVf,:L.,./.1.7.,.........'.''''''RWIIIIVINfill.7.1.,1,4''....' *.03...C19129•A 1112.••: .CPAL•1•CLAY . la , • . . '''''IL 14.."Cl..7;'19:''"'7.'''Ptr..bi.0•• IA... . ''41 ' 421 ' _. • ----____--__--._,--- -:---- c-. --3 L,--:::. ..100..0000 F. .0 EEL...Cr.,E•ODE one vas,/Enna Era.77•111,02E Irmt•Icre;mid 11.00.10,0•••0.101ma et US,.tam to teapot Om et that=RYA . 2... 00,, . _. • .............rw.d.at....4 lamezn Ity Itattraite re:0a Labor 10. . tme•mem tr• ii:01 . a WI - una...re Ira..tr.tarn,...err.aro Moe,umn..01.0n.meld I_ ....-- 0 . ,,..,...,,,.r,,..,M..7.............* .......”. 00e..u m al....0.1.0 "011.-- -/-r-----------". 0 El . num.W.I.Ertl,"Ems Elm,salrf E..4 Um et••••• erf tE•rant . 11111111111r :I: II C:-.. 0 CI CI CI - • ra:E====;Liar%nn:Errenttl=let; . rr warmers Ere Erma le r Ia..;or•*a.. EL,.Er r•amEav•as 2.0,a lon:.. .. t......, I 51 'A:i: nr.ters.71,7••••Irc ex,7Jr;ace 1.1..•distarra at EisE.E.E ova..;cm Emma rErm.Ow E.E•mar... . 'Vicinity Map . . -- • . .,....,,.a...,a E.......a.......... , . • ......6 i,a... 114 _ . . • . . . `) • : . •._ .......,..., . _ I . ___. • II , no LAI '57 .....4-- .....- .....1 ..0..4... ,,,. ":47.,... ....,... ..“4-'2 4:-..... 4.1.!: 1,•;:ii I OM i 1 :4 : I VYTY1,....il 01 1 ril V ti ,._ : dliFILE .i 11 •1 . . . ... ;. -. .., ••.•.. ....1 - t 1 -','i :- ..-- . • ......1.6 .e ',4 -al .:,'V: z- •' .• ''I 6.1l..b Co•UVALLM. • • . . . . • ;41 :-,:LI "4 R _ (I) I n1--Pl•3 a I Lr.i,1 7...i': I t Pi First Floor—tiales ---— Ls. I5'4 ne..s. 117 1. JYIj U.A.I ,___, 0 C10 0 C) 0 0 if i t ,t ,-- I TATO,WI 4.....rut2E, trf-Firs we 1 Iwo... *...'7'.....' V.1., S.M. UP L I - - rz - : 0 rbt _ 0 ... . I- ii, 7 - -.-_ :-• I 1D .7 1 5 - . . .....,........1 I . ....,_ _ 3 -f-4 - - .i ,-...., I al/1 I • :VI. _,.. .... .._ .. -... • T.,Vrer.... I aT—tt.r,, III . _ , 1 'iAa • . -,,- e0.1..... T..., . ' I : . ,, .. ,...C. ... IIHIIIIV N.,-; • •___ irc`, ;di! _____._._______,_ •,- - io. ---- ' --•-••• 0 ------7 -7-1XJ-7 _ (f' 0 . .. 0 !. I ' I r!,51:7411.44.4.Ec' r--------: : — . .-- i—.1.4,41.11:41•15. . — , Foua I.% . 1.1.014 nOltai tf .0 == 41; •:. .11 • u.mire, " .1d3a - i, LT. :13 First Floor —'parts & service :- _.\ )3 ,„ ED .ii.2..,. A ., ,k 'A i)\it\lls NI. .... .....,-, ,. ______ . _ City of Renton Technical Advisory Committee MEETING NOTICE September 3, 1988 To: Nancy Laswell Morris Don Monaghan Steve Baima John Morris Gary Norris Gerry Ritchie From: Don Erickson, Chairman Meeting Date: September 7, 1988 Time: 8:30 a.m. Location: Third Floor Conference Room Agenda is attached below. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA September 7, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 8:30 a.m. TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS (RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL ECF-064-88, SA-064-88 Application for site plan approval for a new Honda automobile dealership with construction of a two story building of steel and glass, approximately 34,500 sq. ft. in size, which will house offices, a showroom, and service bays. Property located at the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. BOEING 4-42 BUILDING ECF-072-88 Application to use a portion of the existing 4-42 building to paint sections of commercial aircraft. Property located in the Boeing Industrial Area (approximately 250 feet east of Cedar River and 500 feet south of Lake Washington). Technical Advisory Comn e Agenda September 7, 1988 Page 2 RENTON/HARDIE PUBLIC STORAGE ECF-060-88, CU-060-88 Application for a conditional use permit to allow a self-service storage facility on a 1.95 acre parcel of property. Approximately 500 individual storage spaces will be constructed in a two-story, 52,400 sq.ft. building. In addition, a manager's unit will be located on the second floor. Property located between Hardie Avenue S.W. and Maple Avenue S.W. at the 400 block. 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: \c:AVX , r , '4, 4/ , DATE CIRCULATED: 8/17/88 COMMENTS DUE: 8/31/88 , EFC 064�.— - �8— a re:90 C ; APPLICATION NO(S). : SA 064-88 ° fir PROPONENT: i anphere Enterprises PROJECT TITLE: Renton Honda a BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to develop 4.09. acre site with an auto dealership, including retail sales, service, parking and offices. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Grady and Rainier Avenue South SITE AREA: 4. 09 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 34,503 sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR . INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air S 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: ? We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional infor ion is needed to properly assess this py/ 7FP al. igna ure of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 f` RENTOIt : UHLDING & ZONING ?'PAR ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 064 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-064-88 PROPONENT : LANPHERE ENTERPRISES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON HONDA_ BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF. PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO DEVELOP 4. 09 ACRE SITE WITH AN AUTO DEALERSHIP , INCLUDING RETAIL SALES , SERVICE , PARKING AND OFFICES. LOCATION : NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRADY AND RAINIER ,AVENUE SOUTH TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : Ell ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT [110THERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M, ON AUGUST 11° 19RR REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : \%lice__. APPROVED I ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED DATE; V.17 SIGNA RE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 / y. 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ;�.�te4 !cam. ` 4, DATE CIRCULATED: 8/17/88 8/31/88 ' :~ 23 >�� • COMMENTS DUE: �-; ' � + EFC 0'64=-- - __ EL_ >A5 4a-) APPLICATION NO(S). : SA 064-88 44, \c� \ PROPONENT: Lanphere Enterprises ? , PROJECT TITLE: Renton Honda BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to develop 4.09 acre site with an auto dealership, including retail sales, service, parking and offices. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Grady and Rainier Avenue South SITE AREA: 4. 09 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 34,503 sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • C3 -i, OF R.P TON t11 AUG 191 88 BUILDING ! ZON►r4k, 8,2T. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expert in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additiona' inf rmation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Sig e of Director r Authorized Representative Date Form 4 / RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 064 , - _3$_ APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-064-88 PROPONENT : LANPHERE ENTERPRISES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON HONDA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO DEVELOP 4. 09 ACRE SITE WITH AN AUTO DEALERSHIP , INCLUDING RETAIL SALES, SERVICE, PARKING AND OFFICES . LOCATION : NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRADY AND RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : n ENGINEERING DIVISION F-1 TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT i4, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON AUGUST 11 1988 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : rB L APPROVED I ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ] NOT APPROVED Y'/c k E l— of---'7 Z cA i L 0/ C-c) D---5-- /7 �I!�'� C I DATE; F'' _--Pdi SIG TU ,5 OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE . REVISION 5/1982 - r.r � 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �. �'��` REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ��. � ,�/ DATE CIRCULATED: 8/1 /88 COMMENTS DUE: 8/31/88 41tz, _0)�(r//y�q SA 064-88 G�y fit Pr,brON iph , � . APPLICATION NO(S). : AUG 1 7 gggg ` ,` 4� PROPONENT: I nphPre Enterprises PROJECT TITLE: Renton Honda (� (� • 11`7 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to develop'4.09acre site with an auto dealership, including retail sales, service, parking and offices. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Grady• and Rainier Avenue South SITE AREA: 4. 09 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 34,503 -sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals • 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informa ion is needed to properly assess this proposal. g- -w Signature 07 rector or Au horized Representative Date Form 4 1 4 RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPAR _ __!ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 064 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-064-88 PROPONENT : LANPHERE ENTERPRISES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON HONDA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO DEVELOP 4. 09 ACRE SITE WITH AN AUTO DEALERSHIP , INCLUDING RETAIL SALES, SERVICE, PARKING AND OFFICES. LOCATION : NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRADY AND RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION I ( FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT RPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON ATTGu ST 11 , 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : umq e h� j!fffROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED - DATE: - � A-e) �ZS SIGNATUR 0 DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 ', ''----''''''r"rM'g''"'V.:, ,r2 j , 09N: „_,; __ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST '�iI EW SHEET"—` ` -'� �S REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -9 roc. Y t i in , I 1 N ��✓ t ,, DATE CIRCULATE9,. 8/17/88 COMMENTS DUE: 8%31/88 q"› °�C. ck°74efts `'L EFC .. . -RR A. SA 064-88 I ( � A. APPLigg IOh �O�S). . P l PROPONENT: LanphereF , •. nterpri ses �. '��, PROJECT TITLE: Renton Honda BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to develop 4.09 acre site with an auto dealership, including retail sales, service, parking and offices. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Grady' and Rainier Avenue South SITE AREA: 4. 09 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 34,503 sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR .. INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1/(1-rtur- - (7 . /7/ /9'1/ • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 7 Form 4 . • RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 064 , - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-064-88 PROPONENT : LANPHERE ENTERPRISES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON HONDA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF. PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO DEVELOP 4. 09 ACRE SITE WITH AN AUTO DEALERSHIP , INCLUDING RETAIL SALES, SERVICE , PARKING AND OFFICES . LOCATION : NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRADY AND RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : El ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : O.UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON AUGUST 11 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIV SION : fire-- ereMeydAk n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. - A second means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes. No Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of �4/.51 is required. • hydrants with a minimum flow of / a-v-0 gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within /6-0' feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within goo' feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No_ All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes No_ Ail fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes No DATE: ( . /7, /9/� SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (/ REVISION 5/1982 2V REQU I RITD FIRE FLOP! CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME . X/'i G1sc/ D,4'®9 U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS -S - GC, • �,€. P/ aii•9/ v." . y=',::,7/0' ag.FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - I I IV� III V • FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 1,9:5®,' 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE fi1, USING AREA (A): ,2 752) GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: -2 ----- GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD4, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL CB+C): CIF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) a, 7,c6 GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: /S 7c5 GPM CE) CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH Jv ADD OD % 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST � ,�O -4- ADD -4)-- % • 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH 6,n- ADD 1 ) % 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST "--0 .1.- ADD % 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : .) % CTOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJ. TMENT: •-r' Z5 - GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: • CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12.,000 GPM) �c",5®C..) (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: r a? SO GPM (H) • 11. SIGNED: Z�fr , I-ATE °{, -°%) 4 9-4 7 p -,:11 p ENVIRONMENTAL • $1:!? CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET :K 2149N I� � (7,e� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ca \lan S �� p�ii DATE CIRCULATED: 8/17/88 COMMENTS DUE: 8/31`/..:,,, 0 c)74,6)(5)\-741, E FC 0f — - __E__ 2Y APPLICATION NO(S). : SA 064-88 °�j� PROPONENT: Ianphere Enterprises PROJECT TITLE: Renton Honda BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application forsite plan approval to develop 4.09 acre site with an auto dealership, including retail sales, service, parking and offices. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Grady and Rainier Avenue South SITE AREA: 4. 09 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 34,503 sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals • 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services ',/7, 16) Utilities "/ COMMENTS: • We have review this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertis in a _ ave identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional iryform, on s needed to properly assess this proposal. ' Z 23—* Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Dat Form 4 , s - — RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 064 , - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-064-88 PROPONENT : LANPHERE ENTERPRISES PROJECT TITLE : . RENTON HONDA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF. PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO DEVELOP 4. 09 ACRE SITE WITH AN AUTO DEALERSHIP , INCLUDING RETAIL SALES, SERVICE , PARKING AND OFFICES . LOCATION : NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRADY AND RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH TO : I ( PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : MPTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I ( PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT . . '1 1--] POLICE DEPARTMENT .-' y . ,_ OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Fl OTHERS : �_, COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON AIIGIIST 1T 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 0774/Ty ,--A/6./A/.&--,E,e,iv& ri APPROVED `' APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED L ors , 2 f'3 ,E,EivrroA/ sp46/00-8 7 tiF Bzo4o7900/ [UTILITY APPROVAL SHOT TOJ per:I.CAa- LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-'t':7773 T V _ DES 0/Q TO L/pz.Bq,2s,‹/ St5-4.52.4? LATE COBS AGREEMENT- .; ql ,A9 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT Ca:;.:..: -'t'.":::i VR. � / 7 ,-7-;SYSTEM DEVELOPMErIT C:::: 2�l'C Z: Jys $.61/s4•Fr x /7(2G�'e= s `7,/90. -- f°� D SPECIAL ASSESSMENT Arse i .;::: rE-WATER A/0 l� 2&/.;- SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ARP. -SEWER A/0 ., APPROVED WATER PLAN y/,ES W -cam Sri Luz v,- s rAPPi;OIED SEWER PLAII y,Es V. I?i.G2.l)L c'L"►z l7 . APPROVED FIRE IIYDI4AIi MOONS S � G BY FIRE DEPT. �l a-� . €E: ! -.-1 ii:YILVS4S AS. tits ,�,-.e_41,A -4/14444AIN �-- DATE: '7 ZS /Fe SIGNATURE OF DI ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ZQm? &-zr-di -T'-- REVISION 5/1982 �. 146 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C (Y p‘zinhu , DATE CIRCULATED: 8/17/88 COMMENTS DUE: 8/31/88 EFC 064__ - _L8_ APPLICATION NO(S). : SA 064-88 PROPONENT: Lanphere Enterprises PROJECT TITLE: Renton Honda BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to develop 4.09 acre site with an auto dealership, including retail sales, service, parking and offices. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Grady and Rainier Avenue South SITE AREA: 4. 09 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 34,503 sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR .. INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants x 5) Animals `5C. 6) Energy and Natural Resources X • 7) Environmental Health.. X/ 8) Land and = _____ to Use °t 9) Housing 0/ ` 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation )( 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation �( 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: ReC:OMrv\tnvo fD K1S— M tT l GA-r1E.lD, AFL, D1Scthf oureoce tAcoarlu 6 SIO 15e ozi -1O oNITO 1-t srrE ok&y. ® rr PNND scApjIu, Fo.. IssESIliele 5 rT MIS 141611(.1 Vt5A1htt snag 1hiikRSEciloN SHouu rr tweprtrsvEo . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.4 Signature of ector or Authorized Representative Date • Form 4 RENTOrillUILU@NG & ZONING DEPARTMENT MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 064 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-064-88 PROPONENT : LANPHERE ENTERPRISES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON HONDA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO DEVELOP 4. 09 ACRE SITE WITH AN AUTO DEALERSHIP , INCLUDING RETAIL SALES, SERVICE, PARKING AND OFFICES . LOCATION : NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRADY AND RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH TO : 11PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : n ENGINEERING DIVISION 11TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OM BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M, ON AUGUST 11 , 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : pc_Akik(110(4 Duui5ronl fl APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED lr1ak1OSCADi& 15 t407 A cOIrkeAZ . lArc5r u0 PA,R.iCw6 Lo7 An 1 S viEs., SI'Mcst AKIO SHOULD FSt LT IiOSCApb writ' TRtt tutedo . sviitu PSr ER6. T►it CtErtivtir21 LAM 5 r 1R,N m,Ninibt".1 a4 "PSf5ovE: T HE D IS PL Ay R t(IhJ(, cc rr Mio ISclM 'NE 1 ex lc 'S F vo 4t c(Tr, pRomirri s HCL. b tx imam/no w rit+u•r TI�FI� ERP . • DATE : 940-M SIGNATURE 01 IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 4 I I ��",?6/7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: . in€ l S . d4 C? 4O' DATE CIRCULATED: 8/17/$8 COMMENTS DUE: 8/$60 27,4 46 EFC O64. _ - G4? 90 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA 064-88 4r PROPONENT: ianphere Enterprises ® db PROJECT TITLE: Renton Honda BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application •for site plan approval to develop 4.09 acre site with an auto dealership, including retail sales, service, parking and offices. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Grady and Rainier Avenue South SITE AREA: 4. 09 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 34,503 sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth ,/' 2) Air 3) Water ✓ 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources ✓ 7) Environmental Health (✓ 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing ,/' 10) Aesthetics C✓ 11) Light and Glare ✓ 12) Recreation b/7 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation c/ 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: - We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informati n is needed o properly assess this proposal. e//di Signature of rec or or utho ized Representative Date Form 4 ' • RENTOI_ BUILDING & ZONING DEPAR ..:DENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 064 - APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-064-88 PROPONENT : LANPHERE ENTERPRISES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON HONDA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO DEVELOP 4. 09 ACRE SITE WITH AN AUTO DEALERSHIP , INCLUDING RETAIL SALES, SERVICE, PARKING AND OFFICES. LOCATION : NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRADY AND RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH TO: El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION 1-1TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 00THERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON ATT(TTST 11 19RR REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : OAPPROVED APPROVED WITHC6DITIONS n EINOT APPROVED ,02e9 3 , _ � oY- ��q �2��..�,, �...�, � DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE \� REVISION 5/1982 I \ 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET .i rA REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: air cYea °ys. DATE CIRCULATED. " 8/17/88 COMMENTS DUE: _ 11,,,/fr-„, EFC O€�— - _B8_ • '' lb -. 4�;4r' APPLICATION NO(S). : SA 064-88 tt i PROPONENT: Ianncere Enterprises `•, PROJECT TITLE: Renton Honda ,t-, BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to develop 4.09 acre site with an auto dealership, including retail sales, service, parking and offices. . .. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Grady and Rainier Avenue South SITE AREA: 4. 09 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 34,503 sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals • 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing r-,.,•- ; ' '4"• 10) Aesthetics F.- " . ; a, N 11) Light ,and Glare i .` s- iv..J, ,� � �_,-c 1,-,r,,-,, - i 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 1•U'••--•• .0;-,,,n... ^. '` 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: A/ ( ,4 G/7- re //- 741.- im- 4G -77- S/p aq/ / ilytid o/1- le;11*5 �1 f/•eJ /. /6 r-f-Cd10 -- , i' d f(V( f- ,i, f(.(e- /6 c;f(r. G._ U GEC L'G i f( -/tor Mt/ -,ek a, 9:Se'cua/v 4 i're' 6 -. 6ii (/i i - 4- 5/fR /2((hf. tz,/,1A__ , .,e/ ..7//. ,v_z 5,E odd if--tvecj thif air We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional ' format' 's neededed to properly assess this propposa ./ f-e- • Signa� o Director or Authorized Representative Date \ Form 4 . ,' 6 V RENTC•.. BUILDING & ZONING DEPA o 41/IENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 064 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-064-88 PROPONENT : LANPHERE ENTERPRISES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON HONDA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO DEVELOP 4. 09 ACRE SITE WITH AN AUTO DEALERSHIP , INCLUDING RETAIL SALES, SERVICE , PARKING AND OFFICES . LOCATION : NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRADY AND RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION [] TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT F," '/ � n .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT L n POLICE DEPARTMENT ,`•j 9 n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 00THERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON AUGUST 11 , 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : #1" / /fe n APPROVED 7 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Ei NOT APPROVED aAdfC �� , s,�l�cod 7 fl� j u�� 4 LA" fay ke 7th aC a wl d M(/ f(k- - "aid a0A , -‘t AiRdfr-( "vr %(e ,f o the a7z6)w, a/pec a/ 7 (7 r6 DATE: f/r �� SIGNATU DIR CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -1315 c, DATE CIRCULATED: R/17/88 COMMENTS DUE: 8/31/88 EFC 064- _ - APPLICATION NO(S). : SA 064-88 PROPONENT: Ianphere Enterprises PROJECT TITLE: Renton Honda BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to develop 4.09 acre site with an auto dealership, including retail sales, service, parking and offices. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Grady and Rainier Avenue South SITE AREA: 4. 09 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 34,503 sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE . MINOR MAJOR . INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth l/ 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants --' 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation r/ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation G/ 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • See attachment. L We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. -41--�� 9-19-88 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 �a a Lanphere Enterprises Renton Honda EFC 064-88 SA 064-88 1. Provide traffic impact analysis. Include the following information: a) Trip generation impact on adjacent streets and intersections b) Trip generation through the following specific intersections: 1) SW Grady Way & Powell Ave. SW 2) SW 7th Street& Hardie Ave. SW c) Traffic signal warrant analysis for Grady Way & Maple Ave. SW. 2. Developer to participate in cost for traffic signal installation at the above two intersections per latecomer's agreement (Holvick de Regt Koering) . Cost of participation will be determined after the trip generation impact is known as requested in item (1) above. 3. Developer to provide a proposed traffic channelization plan for SW Grady Way from Rainier Ave. to Lind Ave. SW. The plan should include left turn pockets for SW Grady Way to Maple Ave. SW and a center lane two-way left-turn at the driveway between Maple & Rainier Ave. If space is not available for two-way left-turn channelization, then a restrictive turning movement channelization must be provided on Grady Way for the driveway. Note: Channelization plan to be coordinated with City widening plan for Grady Way. - 4. Developer to participate in cost of upgrading the street lighting level on Grady Way. Cost is as follows: eight street light units at $260.00 each. 8 x $260.00 = $2,080.00 5. Driveway width to be 30 feet, not 24 feet as shown. 6. Developer to participate in the North Rent'on'Benefit District at the rate of $197.00 per trip generated. UTife—co t will be determined after the traffic impact analysis is reviewed. L. ." RENTOP _UILDI 1G & ZONING DEPAR': ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 064 - 88 , APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-064-88 PROPONENT : LANPHERE ENTERPRISES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON.HONDA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO DEVELOP 4. 09 ACRE SITE WITH AN AUTO DEALERSHIP , INCLUDING RETAIL SALES, SERVICE ,' PARKING AND OFFICES . LOCATION : NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRADY AND RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH TO : I ] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : .ENGINEERING DIVISION N1TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : I ] UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION [-AFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT I ] BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT ❑ POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 00THERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON ATTGi1ST 11 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : TRAFFIC ENGINEERING n APPROVED I ] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 21<10T APPROVED See attachment. ' `,,- '4,G e9Y 01C• DATE: 9-19-88 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZE REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Lanphere Enterprises Renton Honda EFC 064-88 SA 064-88 1. Provide traffic impact analysis. Include the following information: a) Trip generation impact on adjacent streets and intersections b) Trip generation through the following specific intersections: 1) SW Grady Way & Powell Ave. SW 2) SW 7th Street & Hardie Ave. SW c) Traffic signal warrant analysis for Grady Way & Maple Ave. SW. 2. Developer to participate in cost for traffic signal installation at the above two intersections per latecomer's agreement (Holvick de Regt Koering) . Cost of participation will be determined after the trip generation impact is known as requested in item (1) above. 3. Developer to provide a proposed traffic channelization plan for SW Grady Way from Rainier Ave. to Lind Ave. SW. The plan should include left turn pockets for SW Grady Way to Maple Ave. SW and a center lane two-way left-turn at the driveway between Maple & Rainier Ave. If space is not available for two-way left-turn channelization, then a restrictive turning movement channelization must be provided on Grady Way for the driveway. Note: Channelization plan to be coordinated with City widening plan for Grady Way. 4. Developer to participate in cost of upgrading the street lighting level on Grady Way. Cost is as follows: eight street light units at $260.00 each. 8 x $260.00 = $2,080.00 5. Driveway width to be 30 feet, not 24 feet as shown. 6. Developer to participate in the North Renton Benefit District at the rate of $197.00 per trip generated. The cost will be determined after the traffic impact analysis is reviewed. r. I� 'rr •` 7 ��,♦ FPS '' ': ur % Cz tl Curtis beattie & associ is Lrru 0,F umaRgeraior L architects 100 West Harrison Plaza/Suite 220 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98119 DATE 8.'7-88 JOB NO. (206) 282-8512 ATTENTION `! V GVG vJiL L ENO QG.. ib..N M RE: TO i�e1.1To) GI T)l HALL Ip-EtJTc k-1oNPP.- ZONING' "t>ffPT z c r11 L.L / v WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ILESSat%(4EI2, the following items: — ❑ Shop drawings 0 Prints E Plans 0 Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter 0 Change order 0 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION / c. /.es 7 REt i o N5 oNDA - S 17 r.-xm / ?ilZn 1lptl c"7. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit _ copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution — ❑r'As requested 0 Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints O For review and comment 0 O FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO • SIGNED: ,Le..,..j. PRODUCT 240-3 Lass Inc.,Groton,Mass.01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify at once. NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION Lanphere Enterprises ECF-064-88, SA-064-88 Application for site plan approval for a new Honda automobile dealership with construction of a two story building of steel and glass, approximately 34,500 sq. ft. in size, which will house offices, showroom, and service bays. GENERAL LOCATION Property is located at the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. N PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED 1. Site Plan Approval 2 . Building Permit Application can be reviewed at the Planning Department located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For more information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Department at 235-2550. I `., %• .i CITY OF RENTON 4;444,`yr POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor August 18, 1988 Eugene Horbach 827 - 108th N. E. Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Renton Honda Site Plan ECF-064-88, SA-64-88 Dear Mr. Horbach: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above-referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee on September 7, 1988. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact our office at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/adk 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 410 CITY OF RENTON M ,k t POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor August 18, 1988 Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Co. 10717 N. W. 4th Street, Suite 9 Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Renton Honda Site Plan ECF-064-88, SA-64-88 Dear Mr. Blaylock: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above-referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee on September 7, 1988. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact our office at 235-2550. Sincerely, c),,i7 Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/adk 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 9I (.,0 4, „ u CITY OF RENTON � r `' POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor August 18, 1988 Bob Stalp Lanphere Enterprises 12520 S. W. Canyon Road Beaverton, OR 97005 Re: Renton Honda Site Plan ECF-064-88, SA-64-88 Dear Mr. Stalp: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above-referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee on September 7, 1988. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact our office at 235-2550. Sincerely, cm,r ./ Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/adk • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 - WATERFRONT REPROGh.,,IHICS •�� R��'l� 903 WESTERN AVENUE * �+- „ Ln SEATTLE, WA 98104 (206)467-9889 NG I ~ DATEc81)1 GRP�� L D R T o TO-6Inlu- AvaS , ORDERED BY ORDER NO. SHIPPED VIA DUE \)0W1,1 7 1)1 2+'•31) DESCRIPTION 1 "- V" S. r- 8!'0d 8 I enV I. LA\ Li 5_ N . !`;OANJ dQ All? NO.OF PACKAGES ) RECEIVED COMPLETE ORDER PARTIAL ORDER I 1 / ORIGINALS ENCLOSED YES NO rf--- e9--ce -t-i( Mz-- WATERFRONT REPROGi■n pHI1�ra7 �� 903 WESTERN AVENUE * 'til. Lin SEATTLE, WA 98104 (206)467-9889 7AGIG��~� DATE 8j II- . GR (_,V l )S e) ):M1? E Cl ry Ot- 4-2-1:::Y'0 Zrzt3I'- - ti)) . S 0 I L "�(0'D 01 L.I.S S, eV—tldYw--. D R V:,3 o 01_.4y Ul'77 ORDERED BY ORDER NO. SHIPPED VIA ' DUE )-941'6"- -2(0)2.l L, S}.TO DESCRIPTION CITY OF REM 1 O I . M F?, n 111T � I • �J OF PACKAGES ) AUG 1219es RECEIVED TE ORDER PARTIAL ORDER I J BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. • -NCLOSED YES NO Fr / curtis Beattie & ass( Ites L-E4 ;z Oo 1 UM S1117MI architects 100 West Harrison Plaza/Suite 220 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98119 JOB NO. (206) 282-8512 ATTENTION\ rr' L ( ( f0 TO y r/V �c / j �(s� r )(I Z JL/< ( ,e m(M-, s 3 oS5— `,sq WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via /12 '`( the following items: ❑ Shop drawings 0 Prints tans 0 Samples 0 Specifications O Copy of letter 0 Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION '(2 / fi 77 S(7 , / (r ,',U N /5 ' c/r c NIT-/ /447/1 G 1 sl%1— / fir✓ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval or your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested 0 Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS 440 f,,sAJ� ON/Q,1 9 g •.firi e On COPY TO SIGNED: /7�% -�i r.-- ";A �1 PRODUCT24Qa /nresaI Inc,Groton,Mac&01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. curtis beattie & associai LIE-MT 0 7MQKSEIT77Q-, architects 100 West Harrison Plaza/Suite 220 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98119 DATE 10 JOB NO. (206) 282-8512 ATTENTION / IP � �I� TO Cirri / / RE p 7jf �`�� /Anf - G ' °7- 6M,uu- AVg s 780 5'S AUG 1 5 1988 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via - the following items: ❑ Shop drawings Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION ilii / fziar77 i it5 O f( T 45•gp / / c2 Co-, y op- /4 7,1 THESE ARE TRANS as checked below: for ap royal ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval or your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED: PRODUCT240-3 I EeS}Inc„Groton,Mass.01471. It enclosures are not as noted, kindly not.y us at once. • CITY OF RENTON : BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director August 11, 1988 Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Company . 10717 N.E. Fourth Street, Suite #9 ,Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE: Application for Site Approval for Renton Honda proposed to be located at S.W. Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South (SA 064-88) Dear Roger: We have received and begun to review application materials for the above-referenced project. In order to proceed with the review we must have a revised vicinity map (instructions enclosed) . If you have questions please contact me or Lenora Blauman of our staff. Thank you. Don- d K. Er'ckson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:lrb:81188 Enclosure nnn 1E 11 w_.__.... o_..+t _ D....+..-. RT....1.:....+..., OM( _ (')1141 ')2C-7Cdll V CITY OF RENTON VICINITY MAP INSTRUCTIONS A vicinity map at a scale of one (1) inch equals 200 feet shall be provided with all development applications. (If the applicant wishes to use another scale, authorization to do so should be obtained in advance from the Zoning Administrator) . This map shall to show surrounding properties. Lot lines, land uses, building outlines, and curb cuts for driveways and entrances to parking areas for these surrounding properties should be shown. In addition the map should have a north arrow (true north) , scale used for the map, as well as street names for all streets shown. This information will assist the City in carrying out its review of your proposal. • curtis beattie & associai 11E771 _ F unamardirnrail, architects 100 West Harrison Plaza/Suite 220 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98119 DATE 45• �,Iye) JOB NO. ��//�%/ (206) 282-8512 ATTENTION,r`� ��(J�'//�f �//,�,L/y//,y^/a,'/��/�{��( TO O / / Of' 100��-�� -//N RE. `��!'�� } zAii �'V✓/' I ao WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached 0 Under separate cover via eNNO ,Old following items: ❑ Shop drawings 0 Prints laps 0 Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order 0 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 5$ / AeUGS2 PJ4 & P-oe Feunri • THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: El For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval For your use 0 Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested 0 Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints El For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Ct!iI ' OF RENTON RECF 8V E MG etas BI JILUM /ZONING DEPT COPY TO SIGNED:0 �." / PRODULT240-3 /AEBsf Int.,Groton,Ma¢01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. • LANPH E - ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS PARCEL NUMBER BLOCK LOT NAME ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP 092305907300 9073 19-23-05 SEVENTH AVENUE CO P 0 BOX 598 BELLEVUE WA 98009 192305902103 9021 19-23-05 BJRBw! EUGHtE . P 0 BOX 598 BELLEVUE WA 98009 192305902905 9029 19-23-05 SEVENTH AVENUE CO P 0 BOX 598 BELLEVUE WA 98009 192305904703 9047 19-23-05 DCRI A SHARP 2120 W LK SAIIANISH PK NE ,REDrf3ND WA 98052 192305908001 9080 19-23-05 SEVENTH AVENUE CO P 0 BOX 598 BELLEVUE WA 98009 192305908209 9082 19-23-05 SEVENTH AVENUE CO P 0 BOX 598 BELLEVUE WA 98009 192305908506 9085 19-23-05 HORBACH EU(E P 0 BOX 598 BELLEVUE WA 98009 334040244009 16 2-7 HUES KARA R & MICHAEL J 13824 SE 251ST ; KENT WA 98031 334040246509 16 8,9 STALEY CAREN A P 0 BOX 3407 FEDERAL WAY i01 98063 334040247507 16 10,11 STALEY CAREN A P 0 BOX 3407 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 334040248505 16 12-14 STALEY CAREN A P 0 BOX 3407 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 334040251004 16 15,16,17 BALLESTRASSE ART & EDITH 201 S W 12TH STREET- RENICN WA 98055 334040252507 16 18 BAILLESTRASSE .FAA BUSAM Z01 S W 12TH STREET. RENT 1 WA 98055 334040254503 16 22,23 BAILESTRASSE ROY 4440 PR 1--FALL CITY RD FALL CITY WA 98024 334040257001 16 27,28 HANSCN/KUPFFRER 1100 MAPLE AVE SW RENTCN WA 98055 334040439500 27 1-7 DELTA FINANCIAL SVCS INC P 0 BOX 7000 ISSAQUAH WA 98027 334040443007 27 8,9 DELTA FINANCIAL SVCS INC P 0 BOX 7000 • ISSAQUAH MI 98027 334040444005 27 10-13 BRCRWLIBURDI-LIMITHOUSE 8756 SANDPOINT WAY N E SFATTTLE WA 98115 CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN Page 1 * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: APPLICATION NUMBER: The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code. Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER ' SEVENTH AVENUE CO P 0 BOX 598 BELLEVUE,WA 98009 $92305907300 SEVENTH AVENUE CO P 0 BOX 598 BELLEVUE,WA 98009 192305902905 SHARP, DONN A 2120 W LK SAMMAMISH NE REDMOND,WA 98052 192305904703 HORBACH,EUGENE P 0 BOX 598 BELLEVUE,WA 98009 192305908506 SEVENTH AVENUE CO P 0 BOX 598 BELLEVUE,WA 98009 192305908209 SEVENTH AVENUE CO P 0 BOX 598 BELLEVUE,WA 98009 192305908001 HORBACH,EUGENE P 0 BOX 598 BELLEVUE,WA 98009 192305902103 KNACK,FRED 263 RAINIER AV S,SUITE RENTON,WA 98055 192305903500 BROWN/LIBURDI-LIGHTHOUSE 8756 SANDPOINT WY NE SEATTLE,WA 98115 334040444005 DELTA FINANCIAL SVCS INC P 0 BOX 7000 ISSAOUAH,WA 98027 334040443007 DELTA FINANCIAL SVCS INC P 0 BOX 7000 ISSAOUAH,WA 98027 334040439500 HANSON/KUPFERER 1100 MAPLE AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 334040257001 BALLESTRASSE,ROY 4440 PRESTON-FALL CITY FALL CITY,WA 98024 334040254503 BALLESTRASSE,EDA BUSATO 201 S W 12TH STREET RENTON,WA 98055 334040252507 BALLESTRASSE,ART/EDITH 201 SW 12TH STREET RENTON,WA 98055 334040251004 STALEY,CAREN A P 0 BOX 3407 FEDERAL WAY,WA 98063 334040248505 STALEY,CAREN A P 0 BOX 3407 FEDERAL WAY,WA 98063 334040247507 STALEY,CAREN A P 0 BOX 3407 FEDERAL WAY,WA 98063 334040246509 HOLNES,KARA/MICHAEL 13824 SE 251ST KENT,WA 98031 334040244009 CITY OF RENTON '19P N LI) AUG2 AAR ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER 1 jl qI 7 i' I , ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER CERTIFICATION 4 A/l7,JA i hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the KingCountyAssessor asprescribed bylaw. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington residing at on thep‘,,,, 'day of SIGNE • CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I. hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on _ to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington residing at on the day of . SIGNED: FORM 208 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: 8/17/88 COMMENTS DUE: 8/31/88 EFC 0fi4=__ - __ APPLICATION NO(S).: SA 064-88 PROPONENT: ianphere Enterprises PROJECT TITLE: RPntnn Honda BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to develop 4.09 acre site with an auto dealership, including retail sales, service, parking and offices. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Grady and Rainier Avenue South SITE AREA: 4. 09 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 34,503 sq ft IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR : INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources__ _ _ . 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Ili Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENTL__ BUILDING & ZONING DEPA__ _ MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 064 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-064-88 PROPONENT : LANPHERE ENTERPRISES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON HONDA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO DEVELOP 4. 09 ACRE SITE WITH AN AUTO DEALERSHIP , INCLUDING RETAIL SALES, SERVICE , PARKING AND OFFICES. LOCATION : NORTHWEST CORNER OF GRADY AND RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH TO : I ( PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON ATTGTTST 11 1988 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : El APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 l :' o: -( ' TY: OF RENTO 'r FILE NO(S): SP-064'88 • is cmBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMra ET-a0¢ '88 ..0 l'' ,, -. .,,Trco MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME Bob S t a l p FEES Lanphere Enterprises Q REZONE*( TO ) ADDRESS — 12520 S. W. Canyon Road 0 SPECIAL.PERMIT* CITY ZIP ED TEMPORARY PERMIT* Beaverton , OR 97005 ® CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE Z SITE PLAN APPROVAL ( 5 0 3 ) 6 4 3—5 5 7 7 Q SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE* From Section: • * Justification Required NAME Roger Blaylock ;_ The Blaylock Co.;—ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 10717 N. W. 4th Street, Suite 9 Q SHORT PLAT CITY Bellevue, WA 98004 ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 455-1550 Q WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: Eugene Horbach . PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: ADDRESS. .10 8 t h N . E. tiL Q PRELIMINARY CITY Bellevue, WA 98004 ZIP 0 FINAL P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 4 5 4—5 9 5 9 Residential Q Industrial 0 Commercial Q Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS Northwest corner, Grady & Rainier 0 TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING a PRELIMINARY Vacant B-1 t] FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: New car dealership NUMBER OF SPACES: 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SQ. FT. ACRES AREA: 178, 268 4. 09 TOTAL FEES • DATE sTAmF F ,r. aiS �F USE ONLY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE STAMEN �, ,E ? , � \I k APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: RUG 01 1988 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 11 ElAccepted BUELDI('G/ZO-ITNG DEPT., ED Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: a — I*7_ eje) APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 0 Accepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: _ (Initials) ROUTED TO: / \ �. X_Building Q%Design Eng. /[;,:} Fire ��Parks /0 Police L„_^J U:Policy Dev. 12 Traffic Eng. Utilities REVISED 1-31-84 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). Lots 1 , 2, 3 Short Plat 100-80 NW Quadrant, S19, T23N, R5E WM AFFIDAVIT I, Roger J. Blaylock , being duly sworn, declare that I am ®authorized representative to act for the property owner,Downe h{r of the property involved t in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers nereinp contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF , 19 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT C - u (Name of Notary Public) e e n t a t i'v e of th owner and the applicant (Address) (Address) 1 � • (City) (State) (Zip) (Telephone) Acceptance, of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 CITY CF I F..NTON f',U G 01 1888 RENTON HONDA SUE'Elgz /`01%.!:`O rt PT LANPHERE ENTERPRISES , INC. PROJECT NARRATIVE SITE DEVELOPMENT The 178 , 268 square foot (4 . 09 acres) site is divided into four functional areas : Retail Sales - occupies the eastern one third of the site. Both outside and in the showroom. Service - is located in the west end of the building Parking - for employees and service customers is provided west of the building. - for retail sales customers is provided south of the building Offices - are located on the second floor above the sales , service , and drive-through BUILDING PROPOSAL The two-story masonry, steel and glass commercial building will contain a total of 34 , 503 square feet. The showroom, which is in the eastern end of the first floor, is separated from the parts and service department by a 60 foot wide drive through. The drive-through will be used for both on-site circulation and the momentary parking by customers accessing the service area. The business offices bridge over this drive-through to create one building. The unique two story design was developed to solve the basic problems inherent in the narrow long project site . Even though the actual building footprint is 26, 110 square feet only 20 , 698 square feet is within the building. The remaining 5, 112 square feet is under the drive-though. To create the height necessary to create a legal drive-through, the building will approach 35 feet in height. The lot coverage is 14 . 6 per cent when considering the bridging of the upper floor over the drive-through. Lanphere Enterprises Project Narrative August 1, 1988 Page 2 PARKING Both the interior and outside sales areas , along with the office space and service area demand a total of 93 parking spaces based on the City' s code. A total of 93 parking spaces has been provided that meet the City' s code dimensional requirements . These parking areas are removed from the highly visible commercial sales areas adjacent to the public rights-of-way. ACCESS Access has been limited to two locations on S.W. Grady Way. Even though the site has frontage onto Rainier Avenue South, the limited frontage and design of the building and site discourage any attempt to request direct access . Vehicular access was planned as far west of the intersection of Grady and Rainier as possible because of the congestion. The eastern most access , which is over 500 feet west of the Grady/Rainier intersection, will still be limited to "right- in" and "right-out" because of the extended turn lanes on Grady Way. The western access was specifically designed at the suggestion of the Public Works Department to align with the extension of Maple Avenue S .W. We would request that this intersection of S .W. Grady Way and Maple Avenue S .W. be given immediate attention. We believe that our dollar contribution for our traffic impacts in the area would be sufficient to allow the immediate construction of this intersection. Installation of this intersection would dramatically increase vehicular access to the Payless Shopping Center and the new developments to the south of S.W. Grady Way lying between Rainier Avenue South and Lind Avenue S .W. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS The project will provide all public improvements for sewer, • domestic water, and storm water drainage as required by the City Codes . When Maple Avenue S.W. was vacated several years ago through the site, the water lines and easements for public utilities remained. The building has been located not to interfere with those easements or the operation of the City' s utilities. • Lanphere Enterprises Project Narrative August 1 , 1988 Page 3 TRAFFIC Traffic from a automobile dealership is traditionally focused at non-peak hours and most commonly on weekends . It- is anticipated that a total of 963 vehicle trips per day will be generated from the site . EMPLOYMENT It is anticipated that approximately 50 people will be employed on the site. The building will be surrounded by display areas for new cars and parking spaces for customers and employees . GATEWAY SIGN TO RENTON On the corner of Rainier Avenue S . and S . W. Grady Way, Lanphere Enterprises has designed into their project a a gateway entrance sign to the City of Renton, with the simple statement "WELCOME TO RENTON" . LANDSCAPING To complement the "WELCOME TO RENTON" sign, the landscaping along both Rainier Avenue South and S.W. Grady Way is overstated. Large street trees a minimum of 3 1/2 inches in caliper and approximately 20 feet in height are planed to provide an immediate tree-scape. A gently bermed lawn area varying from 10 to 15 feet will be adjacent to the public right of way. North of the outside sales area on the eastern portion of the site a row of large evergreen cypresses will be placed to create immediate screening of the back from the existing shopping center. Landscaping will be strategically placed around the building, and within the parking areas. On the western portion of the subject site the parking area has been separated from the retail sales area by a landscaped strip. THE BLAYLOCK COMPANY ��Z ci7, specialists in land-use procedures CF J, t:Ep TO /Ar 1988 O,, August 1 , 1988 Mr. Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: SITE PLAN FOR RENTON HONDA Dear Mr. Erickson: The Blaylock Company has been retained by Lanphere Enterprises of Portland, Oregon to submit an application for site plan approval to locate a new Honda dealership in Renton. Lanphere Enterprises is only very well known in Oregon, but it is the the largest integrated automotive dealership with both new and used car sales , leasing, repair, and insurance in the Portland Metropolitan area. In Oregon, other products sold by Lanphere Enterprises include various types of motorcycles and Honda Y power products . This will be Lanphere Enterprises first commercial venture into the Seattle-Everett Metropolitan Area. Renton, located half way between the existing Honda dealerships in Bellevue and Auburn and with the growing population in the southend, is the perfect market location. The project proposal calls for the construction of a 34, 530 square foot commercial building on a 4. 09 acres parcel of property. A sales office and showroom as well as service bays will be housed in a two story building. 10717 NE Fourth Street,Suite 9 • Bellevue,Washington 98004 • (206)455-1550 Renton Honda August 1, 1988 Page 2 Additional plans and documents that accompany the Master Appication form include: 1 . A Site Plan at a scale of 1" = 30 ' 2. Environmental Checklist 3 . Project Narrative 4. Project Justification 5. Landscaping Plans 6.. Elevation Drawings 7. Survey of Property 8 . Floor Plans (3 sheets) The following narrative describes the project in detail, while the site plan justication shows compliance with zoning code criteria. If you have any questions or need for clarification, please call me immediately. Sincerely, Ro er ay ock CITY CF RENTON 4. AUG 011988 The Transportation Planning & Traffic Engineering Consultapth / �z�� l�SPO July 18, 1988 Mr. Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Company 10717 NE 4th St. , Suite 9 Bellevue, WA 98004 Subject: Trip Generation Rates for Auto Dealerships Dear Roger: Per your request, the TRANSPO Group has prepared the attached trip generation information for your use in estimating the total volume of "driveway" vehicle trips at a car dealership. This information is based on TRANSPO's own experience and previous studies conducted for proposed dealerships in the - Puget Sound area. Trip generation rates are simply a ratio of the anticipated number of vehicles that will be accessing a particular development and a selected independent variable related to the development. These variables are commonly "1,000 gross square feet of building area," "acres," or "number of employees," but can be any useful quantitative factor that relates to the specific land use of the development. For commercial developments, the variable is typically "1,000 gross square feet of building area," which therefore relates the number of vehicle trips to the square footage of the building. The standard reference of trip generation rates utilized by transportation professionals is Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 4th Edition, 1987. This publication lists the average rates for a multitude of specific land uses, based on empirical studies of these land uses. Under Land Use Code 841 of this manual are found the rates for "New Car Sales;" these vaules are listed in the first column of the attached Table 1. Unfortunately, these rates are based on very limited data (three studies in the San Diego and Illinois areas) with varying size developments (with an average size building area of 28,700 square feet). The TRANSPO Group, in an attempt to verify or calibrate these rates for previous transportation analyses of new car dealerships in the Bellevue and Redmond areas, conducted trip generation studies at three local dealerships. The data collected from these studies is summarized in Table 2 (attached) , with the derived trip generation rates listed in the second column of Table 1. These studies show that the ITE rates for daily vehicle trip generation could realistically be reduced by over 40 percent for local auto dealerships, and over a 15 percent reduction could be applied for PM peak hour trips. The TRANSPO Group, Inc. • 14715 Bel-Red Road, Suite 100, Bellevue, Washington 98007-3940 • (206)641-3881 The Z nANSPO Crow Mr. Roger Blaylock July 6, 1988 Page 2 It is TRANSPO's professional opinion that utilizing the rates based on local observations will provide a more reasonable and accurate estimation of vehicle trips than will the ITE rates. Roger, I trust that this information satisfies your request for the trip generation rates. If, however, you have any questions or require additional information, please call . Sincerely, The TRANSPO Group, Inc. e"1012 Rory Tlindley Transportation Engineer RDG/rmd Attachments The TRANSPO Mr. Roger Blaylock grow July 6, 1988 Page 3 Table 1 Comparison of Trip Generation Ratesl for Auto Dealerships ITE2 TRANSPO3 Average Weekday 47.5 27.1 PM Peak Hour --Enter 1.97 1.29 --Exit 2.61 2.53 --Total 4.58 3.82 1. Rates listed are in terms of "number of vehicle trips ends per 1,000 sq. ft. of building area." 2. Listed in Trip Generation, 4th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1987. 3. Developed from various observations and studies prepared by the TRANSPO Group, Inc. The • TRANSPO • Grove Table 2 AUTO DEALERSHIP TRIP GENERATION DATA MATRIX DEALER #1 : DEALER #2 : DEALER it 3 : : AVERAGE : MAKE ; Import : Domestic : Import I N.A. : BLDG. SIZE 18,000 sf. : 29,000 sf. : 20,500 sf. : : 22,500 sf. PM PEAK TRIPS ; 65 : 110 : 70 : : 86 : ( IN/OUT) : (25/40) ; N.A. : (20/50) : ; (29/57) DAILY TRIPS : 490 : 1020 • : 320 : ; 610 : TOTAL LOT SIZE : N.A. I • N.A. : 3.88 acres : : N.A. NO. OF SERVICE BAYS • 16 " 25 : 12 : : 18 NO. OF EMPLOYEES ; N.A. : 45 25 ; ; 35 ; EST. % OF DAILY TRIPS: N.A. -- Service 51X : 42% ; : 49% : -- Sales : ; 24% : 28% ; : 25% : -- Parts ; : 5Y. : 7X : : 5% : ' -- Employees : 1 20% : 23% : : 21% : EST. X OF PM PK TRIPS: : N.A. -- Service ; 60% : 47% I 54% ; -- Sales ; 17% : : 24% : ; 20% ; -- Parts : 97, : : 87. : ; 9% : -- Employees ; 14% : ; 21% ; : 17% ; Source: The TRANSPD Group, Inc. CITY CF RF.P•I7 Cif.J SUF.:L:1A �'G 0L1988 i\.1:NVei LANPHERE ENTERPRISES SITE PLAN CRITERIA AUGUST 1988 The proposal complies will all of the general and specific criteria enumerated in the Site Plan Ordinance . The following analysis addresses each of those criteria: * COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates the area for commercial uses . Since this use fills in a vacant lot in a commercial area, the proposal is in conformance with the Goals , Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. "Vacant land surrounded by developed land should be given priority for development . " Filling this empty lot with a building which faces toward S .W. Grady Way will visually open the entire area and help to entice customers into this commercial section of the city. ECONOMIC GOAL: "To promote a sound, diversified economic base. " Making use of an empty lot will contribute to the tax base, generating between $200 , 000 and $300 , 000 for the City annually. POLICY II (A) (2) : "Activities should not overextend public facilities or services. " All urban utilities and services are already available . Lanphere Enterprises/Renton Honda Site Plan Criteria August 1 , 1988 Page 2 POLICY II (A) (3) : "Activities with a favorable ratio of cost of public services to potential revenue should be encouraged. " Automobile dealerships have proven themselves to be a very cost effective type of commercial activity in the city as it relates to generation of public revenue. The revenue generated by an automobile dealership is higher than a regional shopping center with much lower costs for emergency services and traffic control . A very large portion of Renton ' s sales tax revenues is collected from the sale of automobiles . URBAN DESIGN GOAL: "To promote aesthetic and functional harmony and to provide a proper balance of residential, commercial and industrial areas. " • LAND DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE: "Growth and development should occur in timely and logical progression of the existing urban area to maximize the use of existing services. " POLICY III (A) (3) : "Vacant land surrounded by developed land should be given priority for development. " The proposed project allows the infill of vacant ground that has been non productive for many years . Public services and utilities are available and development will actually result in a net increase of revenues to the City above expenses . * CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATION: The site is zoned B-1 , which allows automobile sales as a permitted use. The project will be in conformance with all existing zoning, building code, sign code, and other City ordinances . Lanphere Enterprises/Renton Honda Site Plan Criteria August 1 , 1988 Page 3 * MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES The project ' s site design focuses away from the adjacent shopping center use to the north to eliminate congestion, but at the same time provides improved access to both the shopping center and the commercial uses to the south by creating easier access through a controlled intersection at Maple and Grady Way. In addition, the landscaping will screen the ugly back of the shopping center that is presently visible to Grady Way. Thus the proposal will not create any undesirable impacts that could impair the use or function of surrounding uses or structures . Both the two-story (35 foot high) scale of the building along with the bulk of the building is less than the existing adjacent shopping center. The proposal is actually less intense in both scale and visual impact than other existing new car dealerships in the immediate area. The visual softening of the intensity of the project has been created by the use of landscaping that creates a immediate street-scape along both S .W. Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. The existing pedestrian walkways along Grady will become more aesthetically pleasing with the placement of 10 feet of grass and large street trees. The landscaping will not only benefit the public byy first cleaning up the area, but creating a new image of Renton as one enters the primary commercial area from the south. The building itself was located to create specific functional areas that are unique to an automotive dealership. In comparison with other structures allowed in a B-i zone the proposal represents less than a 1/3 of the total bulk and intensity of the potential development of the site into other commercial and office uses . Low scale lighting fixtures approximately 20 feet in height have been planned for the sales area to provide light for customers in the evening hours , but not intrude into the public areas along the streets . Lanphere Enterprises/Renton Honda Site Plan Criteria August 1 , 1988 Page 4 * MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF A PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE The site is a flat parcel of property that is narrow and has a long frontage along S.W. Grady Way. The building location placement is not only limited by the shape of the lot, but by the design limitation resulting from utility easements . The over head power lines prohibited building construction on the southern 50 feet of the 170 foot deep lot, while a 10 foot wide sewer easement encumbers the northern portion of the site . The specific nature of an automobile dealership lends itself to a site that is seriously restricted because of shape , orientation, and easements . The openness of the development proposal is ideal for the site. The site has been extensively used for utilities in the past . A railroad used to occupy the north portion of the site so for nearly a century the site has been an ugly scar that is gradually being replaced by active prosperous commercial activities . Not only was the natural vegetation of the site destroyed long ago, but the soils were overlain with fill for the railroad bed. The plans call for minor filling and regrading to bring the site up to street level . The new landscaping will be placed in the ideal location with exposure to the southern sunlight. The building scale and placement will not create any shading that is adverse to public areas on or off site. The minor shading that will occur off-site will be limited to established parking areas . On-site, no landscaping will be shaded by the two-story building. * CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES Development of this vacant lot, constructing an attractive building, installing a landscaped entrance to the city, establishing another active business in this commercial area will not only conserve, but will increase area-wide property values . Lanphere Enterprises/Renton Honda Site Plan Criteria August 1 , 1988 Page 5 • * MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS The building will be designed and constructed to provide for filtered venting of odors and harmful or unhealthy gasses . Landscaping will also mitigate noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions . * AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE The site is at the intersection of S . W. Grady Way with Rainier Ave. S . (Highway 167) and has immediate access to I-405. All City public services and facilities are readily available as well as private services and utilities such as electricity, gas , and telephone . Five Metro bus routes to Seattle, south King County, Bellevue , and Burien as well as to other districts of Renton stop at bus stops adjacent to the site. Also, there are 13 routes with stops in the park and ride lot just east of the site . However, while certain employees could use transit, patrons probably would not. * PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT An attractive new building and an active new business at this important intersection will help to stimulate neighborhood revitalization and discourage deterioration and blight. * CIRCULATION AND ACCESS The issues surrounding both on and off-site traffic circulation and access were considered as critical limiting design factors of the project. The proposal combines three legal lots that could have been developed independently with separate accesses and circulation. Lanphere Enterprises/Renton Honda Site Plan Criteria August 1 , 1988 Page 6 Combining the three lots provides safer access to all the properties by: (1) limiting ingress and egress movements to fewer points along the public streets , (2) improving controlled, signalized access to other properties south and north of the subject site from Maple Avenue S .W. , (3) creating access for a superblock along an extremely busy arterial street, and (4) creating access points from side streets or frontage streets (Maple) rather than directly onto arterial streets such as S .W. Grady Way. The internal circulation system has been created to assure the functional relationship of the sales area, service area, and parking area. Since users of the site will drive in their automobiles (which they will be trading in or selling) pedestrian linkages were of minor concern. Safe on-site vehicular circulation was critical and the building was redesigned and relocated several times to assure that the most efficient functioning of the facility occurred. This included the separation of the service, sales , parking, and loading areas of the site. * SIGNAGE Combining of the three lots into one development parcel reduced the legal number of signs under the sign code. Honda uses a standard designed sign that is identical for all of its facilities . Two lighted pole signs are proposed along with three wall mounted signs and an entry way sign. In addition, Lanphere Enterprises is proposing to install a "Gateway" sign to the City of Renton. The 3 foot high monument sign would state simply "WELCOME TO RENTON" . It would be focused upon the intersection of S .W. Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. A backdrop of 3 ornamental trees would soften the sign. Ec.i-00-.86 \L CITY CF RENTON D hU; 01 19 City of Renton ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1 . Name of proposed project , if applicable: RENTON HONDA 2 . Name of applicant: LANPHERE ENTERPRISES 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Bob Stalp LANPHERE ENTERPRISES 12520 S. W. Canyon Road Beaverton, OR 97005 (503) 643-5577 Owner: Eugene Horbach E & H PROPERTIES 827 108th N. E. Bellevue, Wa 98004 (206) 454-5959 Contact person: Roger Blaylock THE BLAYLOCK CO. 10717 N. E. 4th, Suite 9 Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455-1550 4. Date checklist prepared: August 1988 5. Agency requesting checklist : City of Renton, Washington page 1 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 6 . Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable) : Occupancy is planned for the winter of 1988. 7 . Do you have any plans for future additions , expansions, or further activity relative to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8 . List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal . None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Yes. S.W. Grady Way reconstruction by the City of Renton Department of Public Works. 10 . List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal , if known. Building, Electrical, Mechanical and Sign Permits 11 . Give brief, complete description of your proposal , including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal . You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The request is for site plan approval to construct a 34,503 square foot building on a 4.09 acre parcel of property. The two story building will house a sales office and showroom, as well as service bays. Also included are landscaped outside display areas and customer parking. Business signage will include two pole signs: one on Rainier Avenue S. and one on S. W. Grady Way. In addition, there will be wall-mounted and entrance signs. It is proposed to include an appropriately designed "Welcome to Renton" sign in a suitably landscaped area on the corner of S. W. Grady Way and Rainier Ave. S. Perimeter landscaping consisting of large street trees along a grassed berm will be provided adjacent to the public streets. page 2 Renton Honda Environmental . Checklist August 1, 1988 12 . Location of the proposal . Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project , including a street address , if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site (s) . Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located on the northwest corner of S.W. Grady Way and Rainier Ave S. It includes Lots 1, 2, 3 of Short Plat 100-80 of the City of Renton located 'in the northwest quadrant, Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one) ; flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes , mountainous , other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope) ? The lot has been filled and is absolutely flat. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel , peat, muck) ? If you know the classification of agricultural soils , specify them and note any prime farmland. Soils are urban fill. There are no agricultural soils . d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe . No e. Describe the purpose , type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill . The site will be filled slightly to bring it up to a foot or two higher than the sidewalk level. Some of the estimated 10,000 cubic yards of fill will be relocated from on-site. page 3 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 f . Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings) ? Approximately 88.9% of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None required. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i .e. , dust, automobile, odors , industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, emissions would include dust and exhaust generated by site work. Some emissions to the air could be expected to result from automobile traffic generated by the dealership. b. Are there any offsite sources of emission? I-405, Rainier Ave S and S. W. Grady Way are all sources of automobile emissions. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: During construction, watering as necessary will be used to control the dust. The fact that a new car automobile dealership is selling cars that comply with the emissions control standards is mitigation in itself. The removal and/or rehabilitation of older cars that are in non-compliance is a critical service necessary to meet the air pollution goals of the nation. page 4 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 3 . WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams , saltwater, lakes , ponds , wetlands) ? If yes , describe type and provide names . If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None 2) Will the project require any work over , in, or adjacent to (within 200 ' ) the described waters? If yes , please describe and attach available plans . No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so , describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. The site is served by City water and sewers. page 5 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources , if any (for example) : Domestic sewage; industrial , containing the following chemicals . . . ; agricultural ; etc. ) . Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems , the number of houses to be served (if applicable) , or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. The site is served by City water and sewers. c. Water Runoff (including storm water) : 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities , if known) . Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe . Storm water will be collected on site and drained off in accordance with City of Renton ordinances. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe . No. Waste oils will be collected and recycled and will not enter ground or surface waters. It will be constantly monitored to both DOE and EPA standards. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts , if any: Waste oil will be stored in double wall tanks and disposed of off-site. All systems will be designed to meet or exceed EPA, DOE, and City of Renton standards. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, aspen, elm, walnut, pear, apple o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other XX shrubs : blackberries , holly, Scotch Broom XX grass o crop or grain o wet soil plants : cattail , buttercup, bullrush, skunkcabbage o water plants : water lily, eel grass , milfoil, other The site is essentially void of significant vegetation. After the initial filling of the site over 8 years ago, the site was neither hydroseeded nor replanted with any type of vegetation. page 6 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grasses and weeds will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants , or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Extensive landscaping will be used along the streets. The most important use of landscaping will be on the corner of Rainier Avenue S. and S. W. Grady Way. Since this is a significant entry to the City of Renton, it is proposed to install a decorative "gateway" which incorporates a sign that says "Welcome to Renton" . The area around the sign will be appropriately landscaped with plants which will supply seasonal color. An evergreen screen will be planted along the north property to buffer the site from backs of the buildings in the adjacent shopping center. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds , finches , blue jays , other Mammals : deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass , salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Yes. Since Renton is located at the south end of Lake Washington, the general area falls within the north-south migration route which parallels Lake Washington. page 7 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The increased landscaping could be expected to attract birds. 6 . ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil , wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be used to light the site and to light and heat the building. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of the proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. Except compliance with the state energy code as it relates to building construction. 7 . ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals , risk of fire and explosion, spill , or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Hazardous wastes including waste oils, gasoline, and solvents will be handled by the employees. All facilities will be designed to code requirements and employees will undertake specialized instruction to deal with hazardous chemicals. The building will be equipped with sprinklers to reduce the fire hazard per City code. In addition, the personnel will be trained in safety measures and emergency equipment will be located throughout the facility. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None is anticipated. City emergency services are available from the main fire station (Station 11) . page 8 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards , if any: Appropriate precautions are taken by proper training of personnel and availability of emergency equipment in service areas. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic , equipment , operation, other) ? High noise levels exist as a result of heavy traffic volumes on S.W. Grady Way, on Rainier Ave S. and I-405. Major construction noise from traffic improvements to both S.W. Grady Way and I-405 are anticipated over the next three years. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other) ? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. During construction, normal noises from heavy equipment would emanate from the site. On a long-term basis, since this use is so similar to other uses in the area, and since the site is surrounded by traffic, the contribution from this site would be negligible. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts , if any: Construction would occur in accordance with City of Renton standards. In the long term, landscaping will help to mitigate noise. 8 . LAND AND SHORELINE USE a . What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The subject site is vacant, undeveloped land. It was originally used as railroad right-of-way. To the north of the site is a diversified shopping center. Across Rainier Avenue S. to the east is the Sound Ford Automobile agency. South of the site across S. W. Grady Way is a mixed single and multiple-family residential area in transition to offices and manufacturing park. The lot immediately to the west is vacant, but beyond it is a manufacturing park. page 9 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe . No c . Describe any structures on the site. A major high voltage overhead transmission line runs along the southern portion of the site adjacent to S . W. Grady Way. Two towers are located on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? B-1, Business Use f . What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i . Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? No one would reside on the site. Employment is anticipated to be 60 people. j . Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts , if any: N/A page 10 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 1 . Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans , if any: The proposed use is in conformance with both the Comprehensive Plan and the present B-1 zoning. This automobile dealership will have a symbiotic relationship with others in the area. 9 . HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units , if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c . Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts , if any: N/A 10 . AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure (s) , not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material (s) proposed. The maximum building height will be 35 feet. The building will be constructed of masonry, concrete, aluminum, steel, and glass with a stone front. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c . Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts , if any: The applicant is proposing to create a new "gateway" to greet people entering the commercial core area of the City of Renton. The concept is to create a controlled image of the City of Renton and promote a positive, friendly attitude to both citizen and visitors. page 11 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 11 . LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur. The proposal will produce the light and glare typically associated with automobile dealerships. The sales lot ant the building will be lighted. There will be light from headlights entering and exiting the site. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? There is existing light and glare from surrounding traffic on city streets and from the freeway. Also, there is light and glare from automobiles entering and leaving the parking lot at the shopping center to the north and the automobile sales lot across Rainier Avenue S. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts , if any: Landscaping will help mitigate light and glare impacts. 12 . RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The subject site is located in an area of intensive retail commercial uses. It is also subject to extremely high traffic levels on S. W. Grady Way. No formal recreation facilities are available in the immediate area and none have been planned by the City. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No page 12 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreational opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant , if any: None 13 . HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national , state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe . No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic , archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c . Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14 . TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans , if any. The direct access to S. W. Grady Way will be limited to right turns. Primary access will be off of the proposed extension of Maple Avenue S. W. which leads to Rainier Avenue and to I-405. The intersection of S. W. Grady Way and Maple Avenue S. W. will be signalized. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? At least 5 bus routes travel immediately adjacent to the site. There are bus stops both on Rainier Avenue S. and on S. W. Grady Way. A large Park-and-Ride lot is located 1 block east. There are • thirteen routes that have stops in this lot. Destinations include Seattle, Burien, Sea-Tac, Kent, Auburn, Enumclaw, Maple Valley, Lake Kathleen, Issaquah, Bellevue, University District, and Redmond. page 13 N Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 c . How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The project will not eliminate any parking spaces. A total of 93 spaces will be provided for employees and clients. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets , or improvements to existing roads or streets , not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) . Yes. -- See 14 (a) above. e . Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail , or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f . How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Based upon the a special study of new car dealerships in the Puget Sound area by TRANSPO, 27 .1 trips per 1,000 square feet of building area (948 trips) are anticipated. Peak volumes could be expected to occur on Saturdays and Sundays. Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts , if any: Installation of the traffic signal at S. W. Grady Way and Maple Ave. S. W. will help to control impacts. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other) ? While there might be a minor increase in the need for emergency services, there will be no need for increased health care or schools page 14 1010 0 Renton Honda Environmental Checklist August 1, 1988 b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services , if any. None. However, it should be noted that sales tax revenue generated from the sale of 200 new cars per month will be paid to the City. 16 . UTILITIES a . Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural qas , water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project , the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity is provided by Puget Power; telephone, by Pacific Northwest Bell. Other utilities are provided by the City. C. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete . It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. (------q Proponent: V --- '-ecle Name Printed: �OGEf� 1 . L )(Loci: page 15 �v ' v ' • CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: February 25, 1991 TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM. C* Don Erickson,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Renton Honda"Bear"Sculpture/Sign Appeal Hearing PREFACE It is not the intent of staff to speak on the artistic merits of Renton Honda's self-acclaimed wood sculpture, but rather to lay out a case for why it is in the public Interest to interpret the definition of"SIGN"as I did on September 11; 1990, as well as on subsequent occasions in the past. Whereas, staff also believe that the City's sign code should be amended in the future to allow for the public display of recognized "artistic" expression (staff have already met with the Renton Municipal Arts Commission to discuss the possibility of that group's involvement in evaluating and recommending on the merits of so-called "works of art" that could be exempted from the City's Sign Code), this should not be the focus of this appeal. If criteria are developed as to what is public art, there presumably would also be developed standards as to how such works are to be displayed and the type of public access, if any,that would be afforded them. BACKGROUND On July 2, 1990, Marc Gleason of Curtis Beattie&Associates Architects wrote the Department requesting an interpretation as to whether a so-called bear sculpture they had erected on the site of the new Renton Honda dealership would be construed by staff to be a sign or a sculpture. A plan showing where the"bear" was to be sited on the dealership site was also submitted (see Exhibit "X"). The object in question is a depiction in wood of a standing bear that is mounted (or carved) on the end of a wood pole. Whereas the 19 foot high"bear on a pole"is now sited approximately 60 feet north of South Grady Way, Renton Honda has indicated that, in their mind, this is only a temporary location and requested of the City permission to re-site the "bear"within 20 feet of South Grady Way right-of-way, just west of their entrance driveway and an existing pole sign on the east side of the driveway. In response to Mr. Gleason's second request on August 15, 1990, I noted in my September 11, 1990 letter to him that although we would have to interpret the "bear" as a sign in the location where it was being proposed near South Grady Way,we would support an exception, or variance, if Renton Honda would site the"bear" away from, rather than next to, the street, as was being proposed. Staff noted (see Exhibit"A") two or three locations approximately 60 feet away from the street where the "bear" object might be sited and pedestrians could presumably view it out of the normal flow of traffic along South Grady Way and in and out of the dealership's driveway. This decision carried a 14-day appeal period on the "SIGN" interpretation with it. Apparently wishing to site the "bear" In their preferred location only 20 feet away from the street, Curtis Beattie & Associates again requested an, interpretation as to whether the 19 foot high "bear" would be considered to be a sign at their preferred,location next to South Grady Way. Staff again explained its reasoning as to why we felt the"bear at this location.was a sign and even noted that we had discussed the matter with the Renton Municipal.Arts:Commission. Since the issue was not being resolved, and Curtis Beattie & Associates had not appealed. our earlier determination, this letter noted in closing that if "we cannot reach an agreement soon on acceptable siting of the pole carving, the City will have no other i alternative but to begin citing Renton Honda for violation of the City's sign code."Apparently, in response to this last letter Mark Gleason, on behalf of Renton Honda, submitted an appeal of my earlier(September 11, 1990) interpretation that under Section 4-20-2 "SIGN"the above described object was a sign since by being oriented to the roadway it was in fact being used "to ... attract attention to the subject matter", Honda automobiles, in this case. ARGUMENTS FOR UPHOLDING THE CURRENT INTERPRETATION Renton's Building Code does not currently make any provisions for sculptures or other works of art. Such objects, unless part of or integral to an approved landscape plan, would be considered to be a structure under current zoning and building code interpretations (flag poles, kiosks, and other similar objects have been interpreted in the past by the Building Division to be structures). As a consequence, unless granted a variance, such elements are required to meet all setback and height restrictions of the zone they are located in. It apparently was Renton Honda's intent to display the "bear" all along. Although the "bear" was never submitted as a part of the applicant's site plan review proposal, Mr. Gleason apparently was aware that efforts might be made to site such an object on the Renton site. In early conversations with other staff, Mr. Gleason had apparently noted that the owners of the Renton Honda dealership had a similar dealership near Portland, Oregon, where they displayed such a wooden bear outdoors,too. This was also noted by the local press when they quoted one of the Renton Honda officials on the same thing. Historically, the City has interpreted that objects (whether detached or attached to a building) that are intended primarily to attract the viewer's attention to the premises or the product or service being provided are advertising and would meet the definition of a "sign" under Renton's Sign Ordinance. Examples of other objects attracting attention that have been interpreted to be signs and have been required to be removed in the past include: the red airplane that used to sit atop the Sheraton Hotel (kitty-corner to the Renton Honda site); a "Bugs Bunny" type "rabbit" object that was displayed in a residential zone in conjunction with a daycare center; large overhead inflated balloons and gondolas used in conjunction with commercial promotions; and other large inflated objects, some of which apparently have no other purpose than to draw one's attention to the premises above which they hover or sit in front of. Unlike the object in question, most art in public places, including the pieces cited by Mr. Gleason in his December 31, 1990 appeal letter to you, are either officially or unofficially sanctioned by the arts community or its representatives. Fremont's "Waiting for the Interurban" by Byers, Henry Moore's 'Vertebrae" in front of the former Seafirst Building on 4th Avenue, and the "animal pole" in Wallingford in front of the Wallingford Center have, according to Diane Sammish, Public Arts Coordinator for the Seattle Arts Commission, been reviewed and sanctioned in their placement either by either the Seattle Arts Commission and/or the Seattle Design Commission. Also, unlike the object in question, most art in public places, including the pieces cited by Mr. Gleason in his December 31, 1990 appeal letter, and others such as the large painted metal "flower" in front of the Interstate Building at 3rd Avenue and Madison Street, or the two tall wooden totem poles in Steinbruck Park north of the Pike Place Market,are sited in such a way, even when on private property,that the public can easily view them from an adjacent plaza, park, and/or landscaped setback area. Many of these sites include abutting areas where one can stand or sit outside of the normal flow of traffic to view the piece. Also, the piece is usually identified by a plaque with the name of the work and the artist who executed it. The only real exception that staff found to this was the sculpture, "Waiting for the Interurban" in Fremont which is located in a paved concrete "Island', replicating apparently an earlier transit station which, for obvious reasons,was located next to the roadway! For the above reasons, staff do not believe it is fair to construe the "bear" as a public-oriented piece of sculpture in the same light as"Waiting for the Interurban'or"Vertebrae." To make an exception to previous interpretations of the City's Sign Ordinance in this case, could open the door to similar requests by other j merchants who believe that In order to remain competitive they, too, must display objects that attract the publics attention to their premises or act as an identifying reference point. Also, if not regulated by the sign ordinance, there presumably would be no limitation on the number or type of such objects one could display on their site. Banners and strings of pennants could potentially be interpreted to be"objects de art" and would also have to be exempted from regulation under the Sign Ordinance. Large inflated animals or other objects sitting above or on the building or premises could, it would be argued, be construed as"art" or at least non-signage, even if it was displayed on a permanent basis. Whereas staff are strong advocates for the arts we believe it would be hard to show that such objects were in the public interest, even if we had provisions that allowed such an exemption, without some outside review as to the artistic merits by some independent and objective group. It is for that reason that we have begun exploratory discussions with the Municipal Arts Commission to see if there is a role for them in sorting out that which clearly is in the public interest as art and should be exempted, and that which is displayed primarily to draw public attention to it, or the premise, or what is being sold on the premises. It is for these reasons, as well as what we believe Is the untimeliness of Mr. Gleason's appeal, that we request the Hearing Examiner to uphold the decision of the Zoning Administrator in his determination of September 11, 1990 that the subject object,the"bear", is a sign under the definition of"SIGN"as contained in Section 4-20-2 of the City's Building Regulations. CITY OF RENTON v MEMORANDUM DATE: February 5, 1991 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: t Donald K. Erickson,AICP, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Appeal/Bear Edifice/Renton Honda Dealership Permit No. 7832 In reviewing the file for the above referenced appeal, it became apparent to me that most, if not all, of this appeal is moot in that the applicant formerly requested an administrative determination on their originally proposed location of the so-called "bear"sculpture on July 2, 1990 and again on August 15, 1990. In both cases, I prepared a response to Mr. Gleason. In the first instance, I noted that the"bear"had been illegally erected without a permit or design review, but because of its location some 60 feet north of S.W. Grady Way, we would not press the issue,as to whether it was a"sign"or not, unless it was used for advertising or as a logo. Apparently, this was not satisfactory to Mr. Gleason, who in his letter of August 15, 1990, requested an"interpretation"based upon their proposed permanent siting of the"bead'at a location only some 20 feet north of S.W. Grady Way, immediately west of their main entrance driveway and the existing pole sign for the Renton Honda dealership. pe . a received itt determination from d e , stated that Inres theonse"bear"to, atthis thelast applicanlett r, Mr t's Gle preferredson "permanenawrt" location en near S.W. Gradyme Way (toSept the leftmber of their111990 mainthat entrance driveway and an existing pole sign), would be interpreted by me to be a "sign", pursuant to the provisions of Section 4-20- 12(C) of the Renton Municipal Code, because of its physical proximity and orientation to S.W. Grady Way. This letter also noted that Renton Honda would need to apply for a variance from the sign code if they wished to have another pole sign along this street frontage. My letter ended by notifying Mr. Gleason of his right to appeal,my interpretation by filing an appeal within 14•days of the date of my letter(by September 25, 1990)with your good offices. Since no appeal was filed by September 25, 1990, it would appear that Renton Honda waived their right to any subsequent appeal on this same issue (i.e.,whether the"bead', at this location, is a"sign"under the provisions of Section 4-20-12(C)). In response to questions raised by Bob Arthur, our new Land Use Inspector,and other staff in the Plan Review Section who had been trying to resolve all outstanding issues prior to granting the Final Occupancy for the Renton Honda dealership, I was again asked to review their revised site plan regarding the possible siting of the "bear" nearer the street. In another written response to Mr. Gleason on December 17, 1990, I again noted that we could not support the siting of the"bear"next to S.W. Grady Way. In that letter, I reiterated our reasoning as to why the"bear", at this location,would be considered to be a"sign". Again, I noted that if the object were sited a minimum 60 feet back from S.W. Grady Way, I was willing to administratively make a determination that it was not a"sign" but presumably an"object de art"for the enjoyment of employees and visitors to Renton Honda. I asked that new plans be submitted so that such an interpretation could be made. I also noted that if there was no early resolution of this matter,we would have no other choice but to begin enforcement action against Renton Honda for violation of the City's Sign Code. Since Mr. Gleason's appeal apparently was based upon this last letter(December 17, 1990),_it appears that the only issue not already addressed that is still appealable Is my authority, as Zoning Administrator, to make an administrative determination that the"bear", if sited a minimum distance of 60 feet from S.W. Grady Way could be considered, because of its siting,to be something other than a"sign". I hope this memorandum helps to clarify these issues for you. Again, we do not believe Mr. Gleason's appeal is timely. If it is, it raises numerous questions as to when an issue becomes closed to subsequent appeals. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me 277-6181. DKE:mjp cc: Larry Warren Jim Hanson