HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA96-035 Amends Ord 4404, 4560, 4549
452.3P,7 4548
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ��P OFTY ESQ®�
.��9VE0
ORDINANCE NO. 4614 JUN 2 7 1996
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMEND
SECTION 4-31-7 OF CHAPTER 31, ZONING, OF TITLE IV
(BUILDING .REGULATIONS) ,. ....OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED . -. -
"CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON" BY ELIMINATING THE PNR ZONE (PLANNED
NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL) AND ESTABLISHING THE R-14 ZONE
(RESIDENTIAL USE - MAXIMUM 14 UNITS PER ACRE) .
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS :
SECTION I. Section 4-31-7 of Chapter 31, Zoning Code, of
Title IV (Building Regulations) , of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled
"Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is
hereby amended to read as follows :
4-31-7 : R-14 RESIDENTIAL USE - MAXIMUM 14 UNITS PER ACRE.
A. PURPOSE: The purpose of the Residential Zone - 14 Dwelling
Units Per Net Acre (R-14) is to encourage development of new
residential neighborhoods that provide a mix of detached
dwellings, semi-attached dwellings, and attached dwelling
structures which are organized and designed to combine
characteristics of both typical detached single-family and
small scale multi-family developments . Structure size is
intended to be limited in terms of bulk and scale so that the
various unit types allowed in the zone are compatible with one
another and can be integrated together into a quality
neighborhood. Project features are encouraged such as yards
for private use, common open spaces and landscaped areas which
enhance a neighborhood and foster a sense of community.
Civic and limited commercial uses may be combined with
residential development when they support the purpose of the
designation.
_)INANCE NO. 4614
The R-14 Zone is intended for areas that are designated as
Residential Planned Neighborhood (RPN) on the Comprehensive
Land Use Map.
Reviewing Official approval of projects in the R-14 Zone is
contingent upon the determination that the proposed
developments are compatible with site characteristics and are
consistent with the purpose of the R-14 designation and the
Residential Planned Neighborhood policies of the Comprehensive
Plan.
B. Permitted Uses :
1. Primary:
a. Residential Uses.
(1) Detached dwelling units .
(2) Semi-attached dwelling units, limited to four
(4) units maximum.
(3) Modular homes .
(4) Designated manufactured homes .
(5) A cluster of up to three (3) attached ground-
related dwelling units (e.g. townhouses, row
houses) , provided that building length does not
exceed 85 feet .
(6) Group Homes II (maximum of six [6] residents) .
(7) Adult family homes.
b. Non-Residential Uses .
(1) Utilities, small . •
(2) Temporary uses .
2 . Secondary Uses .
a. Residential uses subject to the following
conditions :
(1) Townhouses designed in larger structures than
allowed as a primary use.
(2) Stacked flats . •
(3) Combinations of townhouses and flats in -;one
structure.
All residential uses shall be subject to : the
following conditions :
2
-2DINANCE NO. 4614
(i) these unit types shall not exceed fifty
percent (500) of the permitted units in a
project.
(ii) buildings shall not exceed six (6)
dwelling units per structure, except as
provided in section 4-31-7-D.2 .d, Bonuses .
(iii) buildings shall not exceed 115 feet in
length.
b. Non Residential Uses. •
(1) New community gardens subject to the following
conditions :
(i) Administrative approval under the Site
Plan Review Ordinance for new neighborhood
gardens with an area smaller than ten (10)
acres. •
(ii) Hearing Examiner approval, under the Site
Plan Review Ordinance, for new
neighborhood gardens with an area of ten
(10) acres or larger.
c. New Neighborhood and Community Parks subject to:
(1) Administrative approval under the Site Plan
Review Ordinance for new neighborhood parks
with are smaller than ten (10) acres .
(2) Hearing Examiner approval, under the Site Plan
Review Ordinance, for new neighborhood parks
which are ten (10) acres or larger.
(3) Consistency with the City of Renton Parks &
Trails Master Plan
d. New public or private elementary and secondary
school portables, up to four (4) per site, and
subject to site plan review.
e. Civic Uses :
(1) Community Meeting Hall . •
(2) Senior Center.
(3) Recreation Center.
3
•
1__JINANCE NO. 4614
All civic uses shall meet development standards in
section 4-31-7 .D.3 and shall be subject to the
following conditions :
(i) These uses may only be provided in
conjunction with residential development.
(ii) These uses shall be created as a focal
point for the development .
(iii) These uses shall be designed to include a
common motif or theme.
f . Recycling/Collection stations shall meet development
standards in section 4-31-7 .D.3 and shall be subject
to the following conditions :
(1) The recycling/collectionl station is accessory
to a public or qua i-public use .
(2) The recycling/collection station is portable
and temporary (not to exceed ninety (90)
calendar days out of each year) .
(3) The recycling/collection is not located on any
public right-of-way unless a right-of-way use
permit is granted by the Board of Public Works .
(4) The property owners or managers shall keep the
area surrounding the recycling/collection
station maintained and clear of debris .
3 . Accessory Uses :
a. Household pets consistent with section 4-31-37,
Animals .
b. Building/structures and uses normally associated
with and ancillary to residential dwelling units and
located on the same lot as the residential dwelling
unit .
c. Home occupations, consistent with section 4-31-19 .G, .
Home Occupation. • .
d. Family Day-Care licensed by the state of Washington.
4 . Administrative Conditional Use:
a. Bed and breakfast homes (four [4] or fewer guests
per night) .
b. Utilities, medium.
4
•
_ =DINANCE NO. 4614
5 . Hearing. Examiner Conditional Use:
Such uses are subject to development standards described
in section 4-31-7 .D.3 .
a. Churches, synagogues and temples .
b. Community facilities .
c. Convalescent centers and nursing homes .
d. Day-Care Centers .
e. Group Homes II_ with seven or more residents .
f . New public or private elementary and secondary
schools .
g. Expansion of existing public or private elementary
or secondary schools by the addition of permanent
structures, resulting in an increase of the size of
school facilities of more than ten percent (l00) .
h. New regional parks, new trails and open spaces .
i . Utilities, large.
j . Commercial Uses: Commercial uses listed in this
section are permitted only in conjunction with and
intended to serve primarily the surrounding
residential development.
(1) Convenience markets . No drive-through services
permitted.
(2) Laundromats. No drive-through services
permitted.
(3) Eating and/or drinking establishments . No
drive-through services permitted.
C. ' PROHIBITED AND UNCLASSIFIED USES :
Any use not specifically listed as a Primary, Secondary,
Accessory or Conditional Use shall be prohibited, except those
uses determined by the Zoning Administrator, to be: (1) in
keeping with the intent of the zone; and (2) similar in nature
to a specifically listed Primary, Secondary, Accessory, or
Conditional use. •
D. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS :
1. General Requirements . .
a. Plats or Shadow Plats All permitted uses may :be
developed on either: (a) properties which ., are
5
C__:.`INANCE NO. 4614
platted through the subdivision process; or (b)
properties which are to remain unplatted.
(1) For properties which are to remain unplatted,
the development application shall be �4
accompanied by a shadow plat . For purposes of
this section (4-31-7) , "lot". shall mean legal
platted lot and/or equivalent shadow platted
land area. The applicant must demonstrate to
the Reviewing Official that the proposed
development will :
(i) be developed to standards equivalent to
those requirements established in this
chapter for yards, land areas, widths,
setbacks and frontages, and
(ii) provide access and infrastructure to serve
the development, equivalent to those
requirements established in the
Subdivision Ordinance.
(2) Covenants shall be filed as part of a final
plat in order to address the density and unit
mix requirements of the zone .
b. Site Plan Review:
(1) All applications, including plats, require
concurrent submitt 1 of a Site Plan Review
application for fall proposed and future
development pursuant to section 4-31-33 (Site
Plan Review) .
(2) Site Plan Review shall be required for all
development in the R-14 Zone, except for:
(i) new or replacement detached or semi-
attached home on a single, previously
platted lot,
(ii) exterior remodeling or expansion of an
existing primary residence, and
(iii) accessory structures otherwise exempt
from the SEPA Ordinance.
c. Lot/Coverage: The maximum area covered by buildings
shall not exceed fifty percent (500) of the total
lot area. •
_ I
6
_:FINANCE NO. 4614
d. Sensitive Areas : See section 4-31-34; Chapter 32,
Title IV; Chapter 8, Title. VIII ; section 4-31-35;
Chapter 19, Title IV; section 4-31-31; and Chapter
6, Title IV of the Renton City Code.
e. Signs : See Chapter 20, Title IV of the Renton City
Code .
2 . Residential Uses . To achieve the objectives of this zone
and the RPN Comprehensive Plan Policies, dwellings shall
be arranged in a manner which creates a neighborhood
environment . Development shall incorporate the following
features :
a. Required Project Features :
(1) Building Location:
(i) Residential units and any associated
commercial development within an overall
development shall be connected through
organization of roads, blocks, yards,
central places, pedestrian linkage and
amenity features .
(ii) Front facades of structures shall address
the public street, private street or court
by providing:
(a) a landscaped pedestrian connection,
(b) an entry feature facing the front
yard.
(2) Building Design:
The development shall include the following
features :
Architectural design which incorporates :
(i) Variation in vertical and horizontal
modulation of structural facades and roof
lines among individual attached dwelling
units (e.g. angular design, modulation,
multiple roof plans) , and
(ii) Private entry features which are designed
to provide individual ground floor
connections to the outside for primary
uses and secondary use townhouses .
(3) Landscaping:
7
.
-:)INANCE NO. 4614
- p
(i) The entire front setback excluding
driveways and an entry walkway shall be
landscaped.
(ii) All landscaped areas shall be treated with
pervious surfacing and/or materials.
(4) Parking:
I'.
Parking shall comply with Chapter 4-14, Parking
and Loading.
(5) Building Height :
Units shall be a maximum height of two stories
and thirty (30) f et, except secondary uses
developed under Sec ,ion 4-31-7 .D 2 d. , Bonuses .
Accessory buildings and/or structures shall not
exceed fifteen (15) feet in height.
b. Number of Residential Structures Per Lot: One
residential structure and associated accessory
buildings for that structure shall be permitted per
lot, except for residential buildings legally
existing at the date of doption of this ordinance.
c. Dwelling Unit Density. '
Minimum Density:
(1) Dwelling unit density shall not be less than
eight (8) units per net acre.
(2) Exceptions to minimum density may be granted by
the Reviewing Official based on the criteria
established in section 4-31-5 .E. (R-8 ...
Exceptions) .
Maximum Density:
Density shall not exceed fourteen (14) dwelling
units per net acre EXCEPT that density of up to
eighteen (18) dwelling units per net acre may
be permitted if such development can be
achieved in accord with section 4-31-7 .D.2d.
d. Density and Unit Size Bonus . .
(1) Purpose : .
The bonus provisions are intended to allow
greater flexibility in the implementation of
the purpose of the R-14 designation. Bonus
8
__DINANCE NO. 4614
criteria encourage provision of aggregated open
space and rear access parking in an effort to
stimulate provision of higher amenity
neighborhoods and project designs which address
methods of reducing the size and bulk of
structures .
Applicants wishing such bonuses must
demonstrate that the same or better results
will occur as a result of creative design
solutions than would occur with uses developed
under standard criteria.
(2) Permitted Bonuses : The following bonuses may
be achieved independently or in combination:
(i) Bonus Densities : Dwelling unit density
may be increased from fourteen (14) units
per net acre, to a range of fifteen ..to
eighteen (15-18) units per net acre.
Densities of greater than eighteen (18)
units per net acre are prohibited.
(ii) Bonus Dwelling Unit Mix/Arrangement:
Dwelling, units permitted per structure may
be increased as follows :
(a) Primary Uses: A maximum of four
units per structure, with a maximum
structure length of 100 feet.
(b) Secondary Uses : A maximum of eight
(8) units per structure with a
maximum structural height of 35 feet,'
or three [3] stories and a maximum
structural length of 115 feet.
(3) Bonus Criteria:
(i) To qualify for one or both bonuses the
applicant shall provide either:
(a) Alley and/or rear access and parking
for fifty percent (50%) of primary
uses or secondary use townhouses
permitted under section 4-31-7 .B.
(b) Civic Uses as listed in section 4-31-
7 .B.2 Secondary Uses :
(A) Community Meeting Hall,
9
0 ZNANCE NO. 4614
(B) Senior Center,
(C)Recreation Center, or
(D) Other similar uses as determined
by the Zoning Administrator.
(c) ' A minimum of five percent (5 a) of the
net developable area_ of the project
in aggregated common open space.
'Common open space areas may be used
for any of the following purposes: .
playgrounds, picnic
shelters/ acilities and equipment,
village greens/square, trails, '
- corridors, or natural .
Structures such as kiosks, benches,
• fountains and maintenance equipment
• storage facilities ' are permitted
provided that they serve and/or
promote the use of the open space.
To qualify as common open space an
area must meet ,each of the following
condition
(A) function as a focal point . for
the development,
(B) have a maximum slope of ten
percent,
(C) have a minimum width of 25 * feet
except for trails or corridors,
(D) be located outside of right-of-
ways,
(E) be improved for passive and/or
active recreational uses,
(F) be improved with landscaping in
public areas, and ;
(G) be maintained by the homeowners
association if the property is
subdivided, or by a management
organization if the property is
not. subdivided.
10 i
.DINANCE NO. 4614
(ii) Developments which qualify for a bonus
shall also incorporate a minimum of three
features selected from the improvements
options as described below:
(a) Architectural design which
incorporates enhanced building entry
features (e.g. varied design
materials, arbors and/or trellises,
cocheres, gabled roofs) .
(b) Active common recreation amenities
such as picnic facilities, gazebos,
sports courts, recreation center,
pool, spa/jacuzzi.
(c) Enhanced ground plane texture or
color e.g. stamped patterned
concrete, cobblestone, or brick at
all building entries, courtyards,
trails or sidewalks .
(d) Building or structures incorporating
bonus units shall have no more than
seventy-five percent (750) of the
garages on a single facade.
(e) Surface parking lots containing no
more than six parking stalls
separated from other parking areas by
landscaping areas with a minimum
width of 15 feet .
(f) Site design incorporating a package
of at least three amenities which
enhance single-family character, such
as coordinated lighting (street or
building) , mailbox details, address
and signage details, and street trees
as approved by the Reviewing
Official .
11 .
.
' I .
•
• ;>+ )I NANCE NO. 4 614
e. Residential Lot Size, Width, and Depth.
• The following table provides standards for lot area,
lot width and lot depth
Table 4-31-7 .D.2 .e: Liot size, width and depth
• • standards : •
..:...:.....::.........
tW L D
Primary Units
detached . • 3000 30 ft 50 ft.
semi-attached. 3000 30 ft
• 50 ft.
Primary Units
attached exterior 2500 25 ft 45 ft
attached interior 2000 20 ft •
• 45ft
Secondary Units •
attached exterior 2000 20 ft 40 ft •
attached interior 1800 20 ft
40 ft
Secondary Units •
Flats 1800 50 ft 35 ft
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• 4
tl
12
•
..,DINANCE NO. 4614
f . Setbacks .
(1) The following Table sets forth setback
standards for residential development .
Table 4-31-7 .D.2 . f . 1 : Setbacks for Residential Structures
and Accessory Structures:
:.:::.<::.>:>:>:» ::>:> >:.::::::; > :<::«:» <Minimum:front :.:Minimum front setback:;: :Rear setback
a•rki•n aces ;: ..::::.:::: .;::::::
from';the'rear.: <:<<::.::: ::: :: •
rovided• :from`: , a ublic
.:.:.:.....:.. . . . ..:.
• ALL USES
Corner lots Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable 10
preplattedfeetfor lots
less than 50'
wide .
•
• Attached accessory 20 feet 18 feet 15 feet None required
structures •
Detached 15 feet 10 feet 3 feet. Garages/- None required
accessory carports must
structures provide a
minimum of 24
feet of backout
room
PRIMARY USES
Detached and 18 feet, except 10 feet, except when the 15 feet 5 feet
semi-attached on streets lot is adjacent to a lower
primary structures without intensity residentially
sidewalk, zoned property, setback
setback may be must be 15 feet
15 feet
•
•
SECONDARY USES
Attached 15 feet 10 feet 15 feet 5 feet on both
• townhouses, sides
stacked flats, over 15 feet when the lot is
3 units and their adjacent to a lower 10 feet when .
accessory intensity residentially the lot is
•
structures zoned property adjacent to a
lower intensity
• residentially
zoned property
•
•
•
13
1 1
1
{
;;A. )INANCE NO. 4614
(2) The following Table , sets forth standards . for
detached accessory structures .
Table 4-31-7 .D.2 .f .2 : Detached Accessory Structures
i
Garages or other Structures
Maximum 1/residential unit
Number
Maximum Size 400 sq. ft. per unit
Maximum Floor Less than the floor area of the principal
1 area unit
g. Allowed projections into setbacks :
(1) The following Tale sets forth setback
standards for projections into setbacks.
Table 4-31-7 .D.2 .g.1: Projections into setbacks
STRUCTURE TYPE MAXIMUM WIDTH OF LIMITATIONS
DISTANCE STRUCTURE
(May project into
setback area)
Fireplace structures, 24 inch interior 10 foot max (1) Limited to two (2) per facade.
bay/garden windows, setback (2) Not wider than ten feet(10').
enclosed stair landings 30 inch street
or similar structures as setback
determined by the
Zoning Administrator
Uncovered Porches& 24 inch into interior N/A
Decks 18"or higher setback
above grade at any point 30 inch into street
along outer edge of setback
structure
Uncovered Porches& May extend to N/A
Decks not exceeding 18" property line
above finish grade along J
Outer edge of structure •
at any point
Eaves 24 inch interior N/A A minimum of 10' is required for _..
setback I street setbacks.
30 inch street
setback
I
3 . Civic and/or Commercial Uses : Civic uses and/or
commercial uses listed in section 4-31-7 .B are permitted
only in. conjunction with and intended to serve
residential development in the R-14 Zone. Civic uses
14
I 1
..,RDINANCE NO. 4614
and/or commercial uses may be allowed if it is determined
by the City that such uses are:
♦ Designed to serve as a focal point for the residential
community.
• Compatible with architectural character and site
features of surrounding residential— development, and -
characteristics .
♦ Consistent with applicable City regulations (e.g.
Comprehensive Plan, Site Plan Review Ordinance) .
a. Project Size Requirements:
(1) Civic Uses: The maximum lot area dedicated for
civic uses shall be limited to ten percent
(10%) of the net developable area of a
property. Building size shall be limited to
3 , 000 square feet of gross floor area EXCEPT
that by Hearing Examiner Conditional Use, civic ,
uses may be allowed to be a maximum of 5, 000
square feet for all uses .
(2) Commercial Uses : The maximum area dedicated
for all commercial uses shall be limited to ten
percent (10%) of the net developable portion of
a property. Building size shall be limited to
3 , 000 square feet of gross floor area.
Occupancy permits for commercial uses shall not
occur until seventy-five percent (75%) of the
residential portion of a project is occupied.
b. Building Design/Orientation Requirements: All civic .
and commercial uses shall provide . pedestrian
orientation through such measures as : pedestrian
walkways, pedestrian amenities and improvements
which support a variety of modes of transportation
(e.g. bicycle racks) .
c. Setback Requirements :
(1) The following table sets forth Civic and
Commercial Setback Standards .
•
15 •
n INANCE NO. 4 6 .4
•
•
TABLE 4-31-7 .D.3 .c: CIVIC COMMERCIAL USE SETBACKS
.:.; : >:.: l IMUM :. ::
: • :>.:: :;
FRONT 15 feet Abutting or adjacent to residential development.
10 feet For all other development(e.g. non-residential development)
MAXIMUM No maximum front setbacks are required for new structures. For
• additions to existing structures,the maximum setback requirements
shall be consistent with setbacks provided in the existing structures.
REAR 15 feet Abutting or adjacent to residential development subject to the
provisions of Section 4-31-7.D.3.e below(landscaping).
•
none For all other development(e.g. non-residential development).
SIDE 15 feet Abutting or adjacent to residential development subject to the
• provisions of Section 4-31-7.LD.3.e below(landscaping).
none For all other development(e.g. non-residential development)
INTERIOR 15 feet Abutting or adjacent to residential development subject to the •
provisions of Section 4-31-7.01.3.e below(landscaping).
none - For all other development(e.g. non-residential development).
(2) No structures or parking areas for civic uses
are permitted within the setback areas .
d. Height Requirements :
•
(1) Civic Uses : Structures shall be limited to two
[2] stories .
. (2) Commercial Uses : Structures shall be limited
.to one [1] story and twenty [20] feet.
e. Landscaping/Improvements : •
(1) Street Frontage:
•
(i) Lots abutting public streets shall •be
•
improved wit1i a minimum ten [10' ] foot
wide landscaping strip.
• The Reviewing Official may modify this
provision, through the site plan review
process, where it is : determined that
specific portions of the required
landscaping strip may be developed • and
. maintained as a usable public open space
with an opening directly to a public
entrance.
16
___DINANCE NO. 4614
(ii) Lots abutting or adjacent to residential
property(ies) where the residential
property(ies) is located either within the
R-14 Zone, or within another "Residential"
use, shall be improved along the common
boundary with a minimum fifteen [15' ] foot
wide landscaped setback and a sight-
obscuring solid barrier wall .
The Reviewing Official may permit, through
the site plan review process, the
substitution for the fifteen foot [15 ' ]
wide landscaping strip, of a ten foot
[10 ' ] wide landscaped setback and a sight-
obscuring solid barrier wall (e.g.
landscaping or solid fence) , in order to
provide reasonable access to the property.
The solid barrier wall shall be designed
in accord with the Site Plan Review
Ordinance and shall be located a minimum
of five feet [5 ' ] from abutting
property(ies) zoned and or designated for
"Residential" use. The Reviewing Official
may also modify the sight-obscuring
landscaping provision, through the site
plan review process, if necessary to
provide reasonable access to the property.
A secured maintenance agreement or
easement for the landscape strip is
required.
(iii) Lots abutting or adjacent to streets
which are designated as "arterial" in the
City of Renton Comprehensive Plan
Transportation Element shall be improved
as described in section 4-31-
7 .D.3 .e .1 . (ii) above.
f . Parking: Required parking per Chapter 14, Title IV
of the Renton City Code.
Parking areas abutting residential development shall
be screened with a solid barrier fence and/or
landscaping.
17
,I;)INANCE NO. 4614
ti
g. Surface Mounted Equipment : All on-site utility
surface mounted equipment shall be screened from
public view.
h. Roof Top Equipment : All operating equipment located
on the roof of any building shall be enclosed so as
to be shielded from view, including
telecommunications equi ment .
i . Outdoor Storage: Outdo r storage, loading, repair,
maintenance and work areas shall be screened by a
solid barrier fence or landscaping, or some
combination thereof as determined by the Reviewing
Official, through the site plan review process .
j . Refuse and Recyclables ollection and Storage: All
recyclables collection and storage, garbage, refuse
and/or dumpsters shall be contained within areas
designated for such uses, and shall be located a
minimum of fifty feet [50' ] from a lot developed '
withresidential uses In no case shall the
recyclables collection and storage, garbage, refuse
and/or dumpsters be located within the required
setback area.
The Reviewing Official may modify the location
provisions, through the site plan review process, if
necessary to provide reasonable access to the
property.
All recyclables collection and storage, garbage,
refuse and/or dumpsters, except for access points, .
shall be screened by a fence or landscaping or some
combination thereof .
E. EXCEPTIONS :
1. Pre-existing Legal Lots: Nothing herein shall be
determined to prohibit the construction of a dwelling
structure and its accessory buildings on a pre-existing
legal lot provided that all development standards listed ti
in section 4-31-7 .D for this zone can be satisfied.
2 . Pre-existing. Residential Structures : Residential
structures) that exist or that have been vested for land
use permits prior to the effective date of this ordinance
shall be considered to be conforming structures . Such
structures may be replaced, renovated, and/or expanded
pursuant to the provisions of section 4-31-7 .
18
..
_,=!DINANCE NO. 4614
F. CONFLICTS : In the event that there is a conflict between
either the provisions of this ordinance, or a conflict between
this ordinance and provisions contained in other ordinance (s) ,
the Zoning Administrator shall determine which ordinance shall
prevail based upon the intent of the zones . Life, safety and
public health ordinances are assumed to prevail .
SECTION II_ This ordinance shall be effective upon its
passage, approval, and five (5) days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 17th day of June , 1996 .
Marily Petersen, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 17th day of June , 1996 .
sse Tanner, Mayor
App d as to
atkr-"QA.A-e...PFC74).• 64-4--"12••••,--
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication: 7/21/96
ORD.589 :6/20/96 :as .
19
CITY IF RENTON
"LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator
April 19, 1996
TO: Parties of Record
SUBJECT: R-14 Rezone and Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Project No. LUA-96-035,ECF,R,CPA
Dear Reader:
This letter is to inform you that the comment and/or"appeal periods have ended for the Environmental
Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance for the above-referenced project.
No appeals were filed. This decision is final.
If you have.any questions, please feel free to contact,me at 277-6188.
For the Environmental Review Committee, ,
•
Rebecca Lind
Principal Planner .
cc: Mr. & Mrs. Roy Fournier; Ms. Lila Campen .
DOCUMENT2 "
200,Mi11 Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 '
Thi,nanny,nntaine Fn%rervr•Inr7 nnmrinl 9Fo%nncf rnncn mnr
, ,
.
. 1
. , I .
. ; .
•
. .
.
•
i - •
. .
• .
•
. .
.
•
. .
. ,
. .
h
. •
•
-
•
.
• - .
. - .
•
. . •
• —
. . , .,.. ,.. ... •1-1.-- .
.....
. • • '• . ".:',,, •. 4„ i•-•,•• ) i i l• ..._,_-;i 1 I J Ili i i t )11 1
-- t
* - ,. .. . • - .
I ; ; — i li '...J 1 f i i i i 1 I i f i i III II I I I III II I 1 III 1
'• • sz, .
, .•
•- . • '-•
• . ,
.,,,),.•'•
• . I
.,,. . ,
...__•__,...
•
•i.iF":, . . 4 447-":--1-7.•=1
r---------., ..
.
Dc..1- :---,-,,•-t r• • .
.,.... ,,..i. oorvices
Division PAR 2 09 6 0l,4:41 e Z.L
JIikr1 •.-7.7, -- -t:4
• .
- •
Avenue South
Rcriton, Washington 98055 .. * .
.. PB METER . .•„-':-.
•
._
. '•••••;,...,T'l:i: '2''''-'"' .
2.1.230J9U66
B+E FINANCIAL INC
%PATRICK EASTER
18000 PACIFIC HWY S
SEATTLE WA 98188 ,.,..
•
,---\e" .. .•
i v H A EL E.‹.-:-::-- '-------1—i i ,:.1,:-..r 1 \ (----- • . . •
I
, . .- • . .
luNADLE 111 "101-;WP.qs., ki...4 \ , irl d e,.,, Ilail'iliiiiiiiiillhliiinsithilithillillifilliiilitillifil
s
' RETURN IC ‘Nni I)i Ek '',4..1-t I'd )` S .
•
ir-
-1.
•
. . .• • . •
. ,
. . .
. .
• ' • . .. . . • .
. AllIk
•
f
NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION
•
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton.
The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals.
PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: R-24 (R-14) Rezone and Comprehensive Plan Amendments/
LUA96-035,ECF,CPA,R
DESCRIPTION: The City of Renton Long Range Planning Department, proposes zoning
designation changes in text from existing R-24 to proposed R-14 with concurrent change of Residential Planned
Neighborhood (RPN) and Residential Option (RO) Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
GENERAL LOCATION: City Wide
PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
fThe application can:;b,ei:eviewed in thejDevelopment Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall.
°Co'mrlientstwill be:accepted;anytim'eprior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site
:'plan approval. For°furtherjnformation on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive
,7additional-.potit'cations;qby 'mail, la the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing
'date(s) fbr`ttiis-15`r'oject3 please'contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project
NUMBER when calling for proper file identification.
I '
!
11
Document6
l
On the 2$ .t day of VVID,r , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United
States, a sealed envelope containing
deer vvmv ANS
•
documents. This information was sent to:
Name Representing
iTtr. a
cow tt av, Ce.vititot.
lava
Der-r
lunm A.ttlAey- TZrt cf. Alskgeyie...%
'f�av td 1Catefiunr av, Ro 'u.vtd. rRcsQt�ciem
�tck. ecifsdessctel 1"t al -Tvomrtvlittrtn
Su.e- K.ovNer C e f Sea- ..
Lluw avr ts\ 1vvdtan tv Le.
ans\nev\es 6Lt.cklestn 1wdt&vA Th L
e 'r\a GOVV1 r
Ve-citac. 1:turl" l'ower•
(Signature of Sender) T] t0'
STATE OF WASHINGTON
) SS
COUNTY OF KING ) \
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that /z signed this
instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fa-the uses and purposes
mentioned in the instrument.
Dated: . Q YI')&h, q � 716!he
i4 �''`'° Notary Public i and for the State ashington
Y. 1.
�r : F .� .�� Notary(Print) P 171 It:I r) W a-'c-c
«r °�'` � `� Fy My appointment expires: Co- a 4 -9 5
6 g 1 G y 1- / //o �� � St �?�1,�e,.
-'°,iPras :NA. rrt�e: R-14 24e26 av,d Gvvne P
• Project Number. p3'S, R q'.
ft
NOTARY.DOC
,- CITY JF RENTON
..u. Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator
March 26, 1996
Washington State
Department of Ecology
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703.
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
SUBJECT: Environmental Determinations
Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project
reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on March 26, 1996:
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
R-14 REZONE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
LUA-96-035,ECF,R,CPA
The City of Renton Long Range Planning Department, proposes zoning designation changes in text from
existing R-24 to proposed R-14 with concurrent change of Residential Planned Neighborhood (RPN) and
Residential Option (RO) Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Location: City Wide.
•
The 15 day,comment period with concurrent 14 day appeal period for this project will end at 5:00 PM on April 16, 1996.
Following this, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Appeal
procedures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development
Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be
prepared to make specific factual objections.
If you have questions, please call me at (206) 277-6188.
•
For the Environmental Review Committee,
•
ft(.1.-
Rebecca Lind
Principal Planner
cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro
Department of Wildlife
Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries
David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources
Don Hurter, Department of Transportation
Sue Rumery, City of Seattle
Duwamish Tribal Office
Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance)
Rita Perstac, Puget Power
AGNCYLTR.DOC
200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055
This twiner contains 50%recycled material.25%nod cnnsomer
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-035,ECF,R,CPA
APPLICANT: City of Renton/Long Range Planning
PROJECT NAME: R-14 Rezone and Comprehensive Plan Amendment
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton Long Range Planning Department, proposes zoning
designation changes in text from existing R-24 to proposed R-14 with 'concurrent change of Residential Planned
Neighborhood (RPN) and Residential Option (RO) Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: City Wide 1
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton
Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
Development Planning Section
The 15 day comment period with concurrent 14 day appeal period for this project will end on April 16, 1996. Following
this, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Appeal procedures
imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division,
Third Floor, Muhipipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make
specific factual objections.
PUBLICATION DATE: April 01, 1996
DATE OF DECISION: March 26, 1996
SIGNATURES:
011 , �1 ��� 3/2 q6
Gregg Zi rma Administrator DATE
Department of • nning/Building/Public Works
&e'
Sam Chastain,Administrator DATE
Community Service Department
/1"/-rZ 3/267q6
Lee(W eler, Fire Chief DATE
Renton Fire Department
0
DNGSIG.DOC
(a14,
.� �J
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION •
•
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
R-14 REZONE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
LUA-96-035,ECF,R,CPA
The City of Renton Long Range Planning Department,proposes zoning designation changes in text from
existing R-24 to proposed R-14 with concurrent change of Residential Planned Neighborhood(RPN)and
Residential Option(RO)Comprehensive Plan Amendments(CPA).Location:City Wide.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED
THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED.
YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION UNTIL 5:00 PM, . THE CITY WILL NOT
ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL UNTIL AFTER THIS DATE.
.APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING
EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM,
YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON APRIL 16,1996 OR APPEAL ,
• THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,APRIL 16,1996. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS
WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY.
•
•
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
I - • Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file'identification:. •• '.1
CERTIFICATION •
I, �S(A,r1Gi h C 6Y') , hereby certify that copies of the above document
were poste y me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on
'Max(fri 9-91lqq(0
Signed:,LNL1.1' OLij—L 1,,!AA-C1'1
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that sri-nc\ S
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free 'd voluntary act for the uses .
and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
-,~ ;paled: 1 I 1 l Co
' "- , •s` Notary Public in and for the State of ington
., .A. I l co L(( — Cw
r (P 91't Notary (Print) )11 2r � Kh IAA C,{�e-�-�
r My appointment expires: I a.9-q '9
•
NOTARY,DOC
. • •
11
•
•
•
•
•
• /
•
• • • le- iOr c,
- )12
- .
•
/• _
•• •
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
R-14 REZONE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
LUA-96-035,ECF,R,CPA
The City of Renton Long Range Planning Department, proposes zoning designation changes in text from
existing R-24 to proposed R-14 with concurrent change of Residential Planned Neighborhood (RPN) and
Residential Option(RO)Comprehensive Plan Amendments(CPA). Location: City Wide.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED
THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED.
YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION UNTIL 5:00 PM, . THE CITY WILL NOT
ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL UNTIL AFTER THIS DATE.
APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING
EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM,
)(y( YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON APRIL 16, 1996 OR APPEAL
THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,APRIL 16, 1996. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS
WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
NUMBER:::wtte 1 camn :for "r9 jptti eadent�_....R .:.1.:...... . . ...: .:::. :. .. 9.::......P.::::.p.::::;..::::..:.:.,:..:..:.:::..:ficaton >;>:€:: : >:: <;
CITY _IF RENTON
"LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Jesse Tanner,Mayor - Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator
March 26, 1996
•
•
TO: Parties of Record
•
•
SUBJECT: R-14 Rezone and Comprehensive Plan Amendment -
Project No. LUA-96-035,ECF,R,CPA
Dear Reader.
This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed
their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on March 26, 1996, decided
that your project will be issued a Determination of Non-Significance.
•
The City of Renton.Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the Environmental Review Committee under the authority of Section 4-6-
6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the
lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
The 15 day comment period with concurrent 14 day appeal period for this project will end at 5:00 PM on April 16, 1996.
Following this, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Appeal
procedures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development
Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be
prepared to make specific factual objections.
If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at 277-6188.
For the Environmental Review Committee,
IV6;h4t .
Rebecca Lind
Principal Planner
Document?
200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055
This oaoer contains 50%recycled material.25%oost consumer
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Jessica Folkerts , being first duly sworn on oath NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL-- LUA-96-035,ECF,R,CPA
states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the DETERMINATION The City of Renton Long Range Plan-.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE , ning Department, proposes zoning des-
RENTON,WASHINGTON I ignation changes in text from existing
VALLEY DAILY NEWS The Environmental Review Committee 1 R-24 to proposed R-14 with concurrent
(ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- change of Residential Planned Neigh-
600 S. Washington Kent, WA. 98032 Significance for the following project under bortiood (RPN) and Residential Option
a daily newspaper published six (6) times week. Said newspaper is a legal the
hR-14 REZONE ANDof the enton COMPREHENSIIVE (RO)Comprehensive Plan Amendments
newspaper ofgeneral circulation and is now and has been for more than six PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA). Location: City Wide.
I The 15 day comment period with con-
months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the current 14 day appeal period for this project
English-language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Wash- , will end at 5:00 p.m. on April 16, 1996..
in ton. The News has been a roved as a le al newspaper b order Following this,the City will finalize its Deter-
9 Valley Daily PP 9Y urination unless comments received require
of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. , a reevaluation.Appeal procedures imposed
The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Valley Daily News - ,. ; by the City of Renton's Environmental
not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Review Committee areD availableioThird atF the
(andPP 9 Y Development Services Division, Floor, ,
during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Municipal Building, Renton, Washington ,
98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be •
lU n i i 0 PI O f E ri V D P t prepared to make specific factual objec-
tions.
Published in the Valley Daily News April
' 1, 1996. 1377
was published on 4-1-96 ,
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of
$ 44 92 \\ i
g I Cler Valley Daily News
Subscribed and sworn before me this day of AI! ^-`� 19 S io .
6�•9vsar.� it.A.� .S�V 1-,f1. 6 \... ,
9p M F ®ems •
Q�0 �01 �5 gip• ..� Notary Public or the State of Washington ••
d 't~s\ -fA••. s
o •� a residing at At>tvrtfi
l ;o �oT A R)PN N i King County, Washington ,
--- •: *
uvot-t,41 �dz wC' co.
� -
c. � Zc�: �
. T• 31 � oa
. ,o • 0. f wsv� 0oi, ,
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMWIITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the
following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code.
R-14 REZONE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
LUA-96-035,ECF,R,CPA
The City of Renton Long Range Planning Department, proposes zoning designation
changes in text from existing R-24 to proposed R-14 with concurrent change of
Residential Planned Neighborhood (RPN) and Residential Option (RO) Comprehensive
Plan Amendments (CPA). Location: City Wide.
The 15 day comment period with concurrent 14 day appeal period for this project will end at 5:00 p.m. on
April 16, 1996. Following this, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require
a reevaluation. Appeal procedures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee
are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington
98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections.
Publication Date: April 01, 1996
Account No. 51067
dnspub
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
'MEMORANDUM
• DATE: March 26, 1996
TO: ERC
FROM: Rebecca Lind.
STAFF CONTACT: Michael E. Dalziel
SUBJECT: R-14 Capacity Reductions •
Attached is the calculations for reductions in capacity for the Transportation Analysis Zones(TAZ) that
encompass the R-24 zoning designation. The Chart shows each zone and the reduction of each
residential development type. The zones describe the areas as follows: Zone 36=Orchards and
vacinity; Zone 48, 49, 51=Parker PUD and surrounding area; and Zone 71=Talbot Road south of
SW 43rd.
CAPACITY LOSS STUDY FOR R24 TO R14 DESIGNATION CHANGE
t.:
4110 48 51.16 0 0 0
4110 51 55.11 . 0 0 0
•
:>::»»::>:2gAx lo....3. .8A ................... ..
>:>:»»»38°zg6 :::::>:: :::::>;>:::....... 44.t11.............................�.3.Y?..i�4
08 d.u./acre 98 13 115 439
018 d.u./acre 220 29 258 988
max loss in units 196 26 229 878
STAFF City of Renton
Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
REPORT
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
A. BACKGROUND
ERC MEETING DATE March 26, 1996
Project Name R-14 Zoning Code Amendments
Applicant City of Renton, Transportation Services, Planning/Building/Public Works
File Number LUA-096-35, ECF, R, CPA Project Manager Rebecca Lind
Project Description Repeal of the existing R-24 Zoning Code with proposed R-14 Designation(text
changes). Concurrent with Comprehensive Plan Amendments to Residential Planned
Neighborhood(RPN) and Residential Options (RO).
Project Location City-Wide
Exist. Bldg. Area gsf NA Proposed New Bldg.Area gsf NA
Site Area NA Total Building Area gsf NA
RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of
Non-Significance
B. RECOMMENDATION
Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make
the following Environmental Determination:
DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF
NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED.
Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with
Concurrent 14 da A..eal Period.
X Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Issue DNS-M. with 15 day Comment Period
Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period
C. MITIGATION MEASURES
NONE
ERCRPTI4.DOC
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Review Committee Staff Report
INTERIM TRANSIT HUB/TRANSITWAY LUA-96-XXX, ECF
REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 12,1996 Page2 of 2
D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
See attached Environmental Checklist
Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development?
Yes. The proposed code amendments were addressed in the environmental review of the attached SEPA
checklist. As stated in the SEPA checklist there are no environmental problems associated with the rezone of the
PNR designation to the new R-14 designation.
ERCRPT14.DOC
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
MEETING NOT[CE
MARCH 26, 1996
To: GreggZimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator
Sam Chastain, Comunity Services Administrator
Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief
From: Jim Hanson & Mike Kattermann
MeetingDate: Tuesda MARCE 26,..1996::
. . ..... .....
. ...canon.
Agenda listed below.
R-14 Rezone and Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA) (New) (Lind/6188)
LUA-96-035,ECF,R,CPA
The City of Renton, Long Range Planning, .proposes zoning designation changes in text from existing R-24 to proposed R-
14 with concurrent change of Residential Planned Neighborhood (RPN) and Residential Option (RO) Comprehensive Plan
Amendments. Location: City Wide.
Black River Quarry Prezone (New) (Dennlson/2475)
LUA-96-026,ECF
The proposed action is adoption of an ordinance prezoning approximately 95 acres of unincorporated King
County adjacent to the City limits. Proposed zoning includes Residential Multi-Family In-fill, Heavy Industrial and
Commercial Arterial. Location: East of 68th Avenue South between Martin Luther King, Jr. Way and the Renton
Corporate Boundary.
Chevron on North 30th (Discussion) (Henning/6186)
LUA-96-011,CU,ECF
Discussion of comments and concerns received from neighborhood residents. Chevron is proposing an addition
of a gas station, convenience store, McDonald's quick serve restaurant with drive-through lane, and a car wash
Location: 1419 North 30th Street.
cc: J.Covington,Executive Assistant to the Mayor
L.Warren,City Attorney (R)
F.Kaufman,Hearing Examiner
S.Carlson,Economic Development Director(R)
J.Gray,Fire Prevention
A.Larson,Fire Prevention(R)
P.Pierce,P/B/PW Admin.
City ol, ..piton Department of Planning/Building/Put forks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
r'riry rvr lEIrkrreNAI
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: et,v\StvLlakt3V\ Seuv t COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 25, 1996
APPLICATION NO: LUA96-035,ECF,R,CPA DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 20, 1996 MAR 4. 5 1,96
APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Rebecca Lind BUILDING D VISM
PROJECT TITLE: R-24 Rezone&Comprehensive WORK ORDER NO: 78074
Amendments Cif?Y OF RENTON
LOCATION: City Wide
SITE AREA: I BUILDING AREA(gross): M 6 1996
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton/Long Range Planning Department, proposes zoning designation changes ip teat,
from existing R-24 to proposed R-14 with concurrent change of Residential Planned Neighborhood(RPN•pand-Resident alit
(RO)Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
-
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
i
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
k) 61)6 i
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
N Li.,
We have revie i p cation with articular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas
where addition 1 i • i t e y assess this proposal. 3 -22161
Signature of Di tor Autho' ed Representa we Date
DEVAPP.DOC
Rev.10/93
City iton Department of Planning/Building/PuL.... Vorks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P0,yI % COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 25, 1996
APPLICATION NO: LUA96-035,ECF,R,CPA DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 20, 1996
APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Rebecca Lind
PROJECT TITLE: R-24 Rezone&Comprehensive WORK ORDER NO: 78074
Amendments
LOCATION: City Wide
SITE AREA BUILDING AREA(gross):
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton/Long Range Planning Department, proposes zoning designation changes in text
from existing R-24 to proposed R-14 with concurrent change of Residential Planned Neighborhood (RPN)and Residential Option
(RO)Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information
Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Llght/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
ard,
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS,
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas
where additional Information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
_3
'3ignatur of Irecto or uthoriz Representative Da) /
DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93
City oL.._.tton Department of Planning/Building/Puc:._:Vorks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 10( tu( _ 1 Cr COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 25, 1996
APPLICATION NO: LUA96-035,ECF,R,CPA DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 20, 1-996'r'F RENTON
APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Rebecca Lind
PROJECT TITLE: R-24 Rezone&Comprehensive WORK ORDER NO: 78074 MAR 2 6 1996
Amendments
LOCATION: City Wide ,,a.048..,o1146 D(VilSI®N
SITE AREA BUILDING AREA(gross):
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton/Long Range Planning Department, proposes zoning designation changes in text
from existing R-24 to proposed R-14 with concurrent change of Residential Planned Neighborhood (RPN)and Residential Option
(RO)Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
B. POUCY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
AJ0 C6 t>bfWfeK G
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas
where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal.
v2 5 Al7
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
9 P
DEVAPP.DOC Rev.1QN3
City o,.._.don Department of Planning/Building/Pm-- .Vorks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: REVE QN 13UR AU
Fkr� COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 25, 1��
APPLICATION NO: LUA96-035,ECF,R,CPA DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 20, 1996 MAR 1^" '
APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Rebecca Lind
PROJECT TITLE: R-24 Rezone&Comprehensive WORK ORDER NO: 78074
Amendments
LOCATION: City Wide
SITE AREA BUILDING AREA(gross):
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The City of Renton/Long Range Planning Department, proposes zoning designation changes in text
from existing R-24 to proposed R-14 with concurrent change of Residential Planned Neighborhood(RPN)and Residential Option
(RO)Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water -- Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health _ __ Public Services
Enemy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
V 0 P 6-'
B. POUCY-RELATED COMMENTS
`� S_�����. ra / 40 J P i 1
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas
where additional info Lion is eeded to props assess this proposal.
1 7., C
j_3/ (/1C
Signature of Di or or Authorized Representative Date
DEVAPP.DOC Rev.101D3
City o. ;iton Department of Planning/Building/Pu.:...;.Yorks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:S eJ LL) COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 25, 1996
APPLICATION NO: LUA96-035,ECF,R,CPA DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 20, 1996
APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Rebecca Lind
PROJECT TITLE: R-24 Rezone&Comprehensive WORK ORDER NO: 78074 'OPo,
Amendments � ��)/ ®N
LOCATION: City Wide „�n
7996
SITE AREA BUILDING AREA(gross):
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton/Long Range Planning Department, proposes zoning designation Oa ��t
from existing R-24 to proposed R-14 with concurrent change of Residential Planned Neighborhood (RPN)and Residential optai
(RO)Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land'Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ HlstoriclCultural
Natural Resources Preservation
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
1V c Lo Vey W tE l4Y -
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas
where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
n111%;. ee2at 5/Z►/R1,,
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93
City o. Department of Planning/Building/Pu-__ _Yorks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:—rituxs b a COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 25, 1996
APPLICATION NO: LUA96-035,ECF,R,CPA DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 20, 1996
APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Rebecca Lind
PROJECT TITLE: R-24 Rezone&Comprehensive WORK ORDER NO: 78074 �3rz
Amendments ON
LOCATION: City Wide l'IAR 9 ra
SITE AREA ( BUILDING AREA(gross): `a�r
Uith4
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton/Long Range Planning Department, proposes zoning designation changes in text
from existing R-24 to proposed R-14 with concurrent change of Residential Planned Neighborhood (RPN)and Residential Option
(RO)Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probably More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Hlstoric/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
Ak) cv wt wt '
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas
where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Ale' t (1a 3 A r/94
Signature of birector or Authorized Representative Date
DEVAPP.DOC Rov.10/93
City o...o.7ton Department of Planning/Building/Puorrc vVorks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I®\kce„. COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 25, 1996
APPLICATION NO: LUA96-035,ECF,R,CPA DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 20, 1996
APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Rebecca Lind
PROJECT TITLE: R-24 Rezone&Comprehensive WORK ORDER NO: 78074
Amendments
LOCATION: City Wide
SITE AREA BUILDING AREA(gross):
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton/Long Range Planning Department, proposes zoning designation changes in text
from existing R-24 to proposed R-14 with concurrent change of Residential Planned Neighborhood(RPN)and Residential Option
(RO)Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Ssorellne Use Utilities
ran p
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
( Natural Resources Preservation
l�/o 6o inv/77- (,t Cfi,?,uQ ..
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas
where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal.
' 7G -Q 3- a0 RCP
Signa ure of Director o Autho ed Representative Date
DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93
S C S
PR PERT 1� NER
S
PROJECT NAME: j" 14 r '• RA F/cc &r
APPLICATION NO: 9ln"0351 E(. ‘ R, ci9A
The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development
Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development.
NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER
•
_
•
DE
`1EL f� ' ,' •
CIT`( r��e4NM/4G
of gg1`JTO11- ,
(Attach additional sheets, if necessary)
N I
(Continued)
NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL 1,
NUMBER
Applicant Certification
I, I V t;700Sa-ZI V hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property
(Print Name)
owners and their addresses were obtained from:
❑ City of Renton Technical Services Records
•
T• - om•an _. Records
• As',essors Records
Signed �4 Date 3/I� I J
(Applica,
•
,, v .�'l NOTARY
ATTES EDA., ticcillied and sworn be me, a No ary Public, '� and forte State of Washi9gton,
residih a.. n the day of /',� G , 19 fb
•
a �
r 1 �� (Notary P li )
on:::Use>:<»»:<:<:< > : : ::»««:>::>::::»::>::>;>::: :;
RTIFI:CATION�OFMAI G
•
n tc f he ro osed a cat o e
>'»>
........... .
e a c•••h•.•:I t•s••t•e d•:: :r•o•p e r t y:<o w n e.::.;:o.:.:::..�....r�.............
Signed:;:.;:.;:.::: •
... _ :::::::::::::...::.. ..::
� N
ATTES�� abLc(.:and.sworn:;b.efore me, a Notary PuFalic, i d for kh� State:of.Was n #on. „,<>
"�i::4'+:•:�'.4ii?:4i:i�iiii::�::.•i:v:�:i::?i':'�i::��.;:;v;:•;':;.yiiiiiii�+•:'i;`i:;iii:i?i?i?iij?i;:yi;:y;:??;:;>:�:i:��ii:'v:i�i:i�ii:i+Ji:?vi:iii?:�i+1}:�is�ii::};:;:j}<i`jji:::::>::�iY�iii:�i:�}i:�:??};:;:y;:?;i:::1�i iiiiii:i�iii?
in<..
d
?SIB:>I`I... ................... .J 9..
listprop.doc vv-7-2
REV 07/95
2
06622059049 - 3622059051
KROHN GLADYS M ALLDREDGE RICHARD W+R CAROL
9235 S 192ND 13630 SE 180TH
RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058
0622059061 0622059098 0622059143
GALLAGHER DONALD J DENNIS DONNA MAE STYNER LORRAINE A
19225 TALBOT RD S 9211 S 192ND PO BOX 1232
RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 BELLEVUE WA 98009
1023059009 1023059011 1023059012
ORCHARDS,DIVISION I,THE G M ASSOCIATES WENDALL FLETCHER
ALSO 9010,062,067,131,088 i GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO 380 E 4450 N
ADV 96 DEP PD$66,618.88 9125 10TH AVE S PROVO UT 84604
1997 PLAT NEW MAJOR 640350 2 SEA FILE WA 98108
1023059032 1023059034 1023059036
TIBBOTT DEAN W&ANNE 0 MERLINO GARY+DON HERTEL MICHAEL J
17003 NE 28TH PL 9125 10TH AVE SO 14012 SE 126TH ST
BELLEVUE WA 98008 SEA FILE WA 98108 RENTON WA • 98055
1023059066 1023059070 1023059080
G M ASSOCIATES , DYKEMAN ROBERT E LA BLANC RAYMOND A
1560 140TH AVE NE#100 14029 SE 124TH ST 11621 SE 47TH PL
BELLEVUE WA 98005 . RENTON WA 98059 BELLEVUE WA 98006
1023059086• 1023059088 1023059100
CORBELLA BERT&LAURIE A MERRICK ANN G WINDSOR APARTMENTS
12625 195TH PLACE SE ADDRESS C/O R E T S
ISSAQUAH WA 98027 UNKNOWN 0 3801 150TH AVE SE#300
BELLEVUE WA 98006
1023059123 1023059125 1023059208
DYKEMAN ROBERT E MEAD HENRY L WOOD SYLVIA L
14029 SE 124TH ST 12424 142ND AVE SE 12255 142ND AVE SE
RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98056
1023059291 1023059375 1623059012
BUSH LYLE L+SUSIE A HICKS ANNE LIEPUGET SOUND POWER&LIGHT CO
14030 SE 126TH ST 20548 SE 159TH PROPERTY TAXES
RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 PO BOX 90868
BELLEVUE WA 98009
2123059003 2123059040 2123059055
PARKER C A CITY OF SEATTLE ROYAL HILLS ASSOC
15822 SE 369TH ST SC 486190 0 2810 EASTLAKE AVE E
AUBURN WA 98002 SEA FILE WA 98102
2123059067 2123059068 3123059022
MORGAN DAVID F B+E FINANCIAL INC VICK ALUN E
335 E MAIN ST %PATRICK EASTER 4827 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH
AUBURN WA 98002 18000 PACIFIC HWY S • RENTON WA 98055
SEATTLE WA 98188
312059023 3123059024 3123059035
HARBOR INVESTMENTS AHLUWALIA RAVINDER SINGH+JA DIAMOND G WARREN
PO BOX 3825 730 E 55TH ST 4914 TALBOT RD S
FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 .
3123059037 3123059038 3123059041
BURNSTEAD CONST CO CAMPEN LILA M SENTINEL REAL ESTATE CORP
1215 120TH AVE NE, #201 4908 TALBOT RD S 666 5TH AVE 27TH FLOOR
BELLEVUE WA 98005 RENTON WA 98055 NEW YORK NY 10103
3123059049 3123059051 3123059061
BUTTON A I LONGVILLE PAUL&LEONA DEAK ANDREW&MARGARET
715 S 50TH : 4521 TALBOT ROADS 4509 TALBOT RD S#200
RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055
3123059061 3123059063 3123059064
VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER PUGET WESTERN INC FOURNIER ROY E&NORMA M
400 S 43RD ST 19515 NORTH CREEK PKWY#310 4700 TALBOT RD S
RENTON WA 98055 BOTHELL WA 98011 RENTON WA 98055
3123059066 3123059067 3123059069
MORELL SARAH AGNES KING COUNTY SWANSON ARTHUR D
PO BOX 1492 500 A KING COUNTY ADBLDG 4512 TALBOT RD S
RENTON WA 98057 SEATTLE WA 98104 RENTON WA 98055
3123059072 3123059073 3123059075
BING OWEN GURU NANAK SIKH SOCIETY HAYES DELBERT L+IRENE H
5310 TALBOT RD S PO BOX 58423 5304 TALBOT RD SO
RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055
3123059076 3123059080 3123059083'
GURUDWARA SINGH SABHA FIGUEROA JOSEFINA C+PENOR,T STATE OF WASHINGTON
C/O WASHINGTON INC 520 S 55TH ST 0
5212 TALBOT RD RENTON WA 98055
RENTON WA 98055
3123059090 3123059091 3123059094
ANDREWS WILLIAM J+TERESA M+ CIRCLE TIME SHEGRUD GROVER W
REEVES,RANDALL B SHELLIE WEITZ PO BOX 12686
605 11TH AV 4907 TALBOT RD S MILL CREEK WA 98012
KIRKLAND WA 98033 RENTON WA 98055
3123059095 3123059096 3123059100
YODER ERVIN E HOLDREN EUGENE A BILSKI B LEE+ROXANNE H
1501 S EAGLERIDGE DR 5218 TALBOT RD S 700 SOUTH 50TH ST
RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055
3123059107 3123059119 3123059122
MARTZ JACK FRAGA STANLEY E+MARIE PETERSON ARTHUR ALLAN
18831 102ND AVE SE 2117 MONTEREY CT SE 4915 TALBOT RD S
RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055
342.3059125 3123059137 3123059150
WILSON ROBERT D BING OWEN FINK LAWRENCE E+SALLY J
720 S 55TH ST 5310 TALBOT RD S 709 S 50TH
RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055
3388200090 3388200100 6649500160
DUBOIS JULIE R PEDRO JOHN F+MARY ELLEN SMITH DUNCAN B
19203 99TH PL S 19211 99TH PL S 12115 138TH PLACE S.E.
RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98059
6649500170 7695600010 7931000151
ROHRER JAMES RIBERA-BALKO ENTERPRISES PRIMER()1-1tANCES
13817 162ND SE 13740 SE 246TH C/O WATKINS MARY
RENTON WA 98059 KENT WA 98042 22109 SE 277TH ST
KENT WA 98042
7931000152 7931000153 7941200010
MOLINA ALEX C PENOR JOSEFINA C BITEMAN JAMES F+RUTA D
9609 S 192ND ST 520 S 55TH 19203 98TH AVE S
RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055
7941200020 7941200230. 8083350010
BRIGHAM JOHN F KING COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL DEV CORP
SPEISER TODD H REAL PROP PO BOX 1574
3734 BELVIDERE AVE SW 500A ADMIN BLDG BELLEVUE WA 98009
SEATTLE WA 98126 SEATTLE WA 98104
8645500090 8645500100 8645500120
CARPENTER MELVIN L EVETTS GAYLE&KENNETH DEAN PAUL R
1319 LAKE YOUNGS WAY SE 1325 LAKE YOUNGS WAY SE 1401 LAKE YOUNGS WAY SE
RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055
8645500150 8645500160 8645500170
LITTLE JR DON F+MARIE ELAIN REED WENDELL E HUPE GREGORY MCDONALD
2632 LAKE YOUNGS COURT SE 2626 LAKE YOUNGS CT SE 2616 LAKE YOUNGS CT SE
RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058
8645511120 8645511130 8645511140
GILL MANJIT S NOTCH ARLEN J HUYNH JASON THANH
19314 138TH AVE SE 23633 156TH AVE SE THAI LYNN MY
RENTON WA 98058 KENT WA 98042 1401 HARRINGTON AVE S E
RENTON WA 98058
8645511150 8645511160 8645511170
MALHI HARCHAND+KIRPAL+DARSH NELSON GEORGE H ADAMS RUDY H+JERRY L
1317 HARRINGTON AVE SE 1313 HARRGINTON AVE SE 1309 HARRINGTON AVE SE
RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058
8645511180 8645511190 8645511200
PALMER LARRY L BUETTNER TERESA PLODZIEN LEONARD
1305 HARRINGTON AVE SE 1301 HARRINGTON AVE SE 1402 INDEX AVE SE
RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055
864-5511210 8645511220 8645511230
STRACHAN ROBERT HILL ANDREW M+KIM TANAKA-HI GEISLER BASTIANA
1406 INDEX AVE SE 1410 INDEX AVE SE 1414 INDEX AVE SE
RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98056
8645511240 8645511550 8645511560
LOHMAN DAVID A TRAN TIMOTHY HUU NAKATA JAMES F
1502 INDEX AVE SE 1402 HARRINGTON AVE SE 1306 HARRINGTON AVE SE
RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058
8645511570 8645511580 8645511740
SUENAGA JEFFREY D SAYLER BOBBY L+LAVONNE M ORNELAS A MATTHEW+JULIE R
1300 HARRINGTON AVE SE 1407 INDEX AVE SE 1408 HARRINGTON AVE SE
RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058
8645530240 8645600010 8645600020
HIGGINS BRUCE C ROSS CHRISTOPHER G+RUTHY GILL GURMIT S&MOHINDER K
1401 OLYMPIC AVE SE 1324 LAKE YOUNGS WAY SE 19314 138TH AVE SE
RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98058
NOTICE OF PRJPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL, /APPLICATION
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton.
The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals.
PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: R-24 (R-14) Rezone and Comprehensive Plan Amendments/
LUA96-035,ECF,CPA,R
DESCRIPTION: The City of Renton Long Range Planning Department, proposes zoning
designation changes in text from existing R-24 to proposed R-14 with concurrent change of Residential Planned
Neighborhood (RPN) and Residential Option (RO) Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
GENERAL LOCATION: City Wide
PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall.
Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site
plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive
additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing
date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project
NUMBER when calling for proper file identification.
GENMALOT.DOC
•
PENDING APPLICATION" .
PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: R-24(R-14)REZONE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS/
LUA-96-035,ECF,R,CPA
DESCRIPTION: The City of Renton/Long Range Planning Department,proposes zoning designation
changes in text from existing R-24 to proposed R-14 with concurrent change of Residential Planned Neighborhood(RPN)
and Residential Option(RO)Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
GENERAL LOCATION: City Wide
PUBLIC APPROVALS:
•
Building Permit _Preliminary Plat Short Plat
. _Conditional Use Permit XXXX Rezone _Site Plan Approval •
XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use XXXX Comprehensive Plan
Permit Amendments(CPA):
_Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other
Development Permit
The application can be reviewed In the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hail.
Comments will be accepted any lime prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative site
plan approval.Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within Ihlrty(30)days from the last date of I
appllcoml's'Notice of Application•pub/alien In the Valley Daily News. For further Informal on on the application,or If
you wish to bo made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the Cily's environmental• determinations,appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s)for this project,please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550.
•
•
•
•
•
I l
):PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE•IDENTIFICATION.i-''3--i'
CERTIFICATION
I, Sayik.4 �k ck 'C�b� , hereby certify that, copies of the above document
• were posted/by me in 3 conspicuous,places on or nearby the described property on
M.a Ch 22, 19%
Signed: < L-r U '
• STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS .•
COUNTY OF KING ) .,1 ''
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that .5A„
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to •be his/her/their free and voluntary act for aieyu,544(10w
and purposes mentioned in the instrument. o
Dated: a S J'y�a.t GG� f��� ('""`�`'" � t 'rtz •�'{ •`
Notary Public in and for the State �ll7ashingtcq`J';"p,• �1�,:'
'/G y/ /1/4-4 Cum e+
Notary (Print) WI r-IL, I v_) ki4 VIA c. kg) •��
My appointment expires: 6 • 29 - 5 •
NOTARY.DOC
NoIrtolE .
PENDING APPLICATION
PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: R-24(R-14)REZONE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS/
LUA-96-035,ECF,R,CPA
DESCRIPTION: The City of Renton/Long Range Planning Department, proposes zoning designation
changes in text from existing R-24 to proposed R-14 with concurrent change of Residential Planned Neighborhood(RPN)
and Residential Option(RO)Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
GENERAL LOCATION: City Wide
PUBLIC APPROVALS:
Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat
Conditional Use Permit XXXX Rezone Site Plan Approval
XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use XXXX Comprehensive Plan
Permit Amendments(CPA);
Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other
Development Permit
•
The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall.
Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site
plan approval. Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of
applicant's"Notice of Application" publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application, or if
you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental
determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development
Services Division at 235-2550.
•
PLEASEINCLUDE::THEPROJECT NUM BEFt::INHENs:CALLING>FOR€pROP:..,ER FILE:)DENTIFICATIO.N;:._::»;<;;<;.
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
Date: March 20, 1996
To: Rebecca Lind/Long Range Planning
From: Jana Huerter/Land Use Review Supervisor qILV,
Subject: R-14 Rezone and Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Project No. LUA-96-035,ECF,R,CPA
The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has received the above-referenced application
for environmental review.
I have tentatively scheduled a presentation of the project to the ERC Committee on March 26, 1996
Your staff report is due to Karen Codiga no later than Wednesday, March 20, by 2:00 PM.
At the ERC meeting, you will present staff recommendations for the Committee's review and
environmental determination. Following the ERC meeting, Karen will send you copies of the
determination along with the timeframes for the public comment and appeal periods for your files.
ACPTMM.DOC
...;:::.;;;::<;:.;:.:::::>::>•.;:;.::<::>:>::::.:<;:::>::::::>:<::<;::;;:«:<::::�:::>:�:;:>:::::;::><:::><:<::<::;;:::>:<:»>:: E1/ELOPMEJVT:S.ER1/ICE�..D.U.S . .. ... .........
Note >�af<Ber:a:s<'.moresaFan>o'neIa`al>oVinef. a eattach. n. i n
nataned€:Mste1pcaona . hn . . ::: : :: :.: : ..:.. : .. . EXISTING LAND USE(S):
NAME: *VA
PROPOSED LAND USES:
ADDRESS:
Zip o /CM AVM �o
CITY: ZIP: 4�p
1 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
1 'V TELEPHONE NUMBER:
(ZzP) 23? -
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
;:<.,<.; ;;>P<:.;::.;:,,.>::.:.;11(�:�1;.:'P ">•ANT::� <�<� >'�'>':.::.:::::..:..:.::.................................................................................. ......................................
NAME: -S( u N p EXISTING ZONING:
-z4
ADDRESS: zoo LLI, x 1,= gyp.
�"��✓L PROPOSED ZONING:
CITY: ZIP: C►5c - k4-
I SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE):
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
(.2...Z) )
ROJ •
P ECT VALUE•
>«P.Fi.O.J.E.GT:I.N F.O.R.....ATI O.N......................... ......
tic
PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Pf lqq"� () /
is<A10-117, IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA?
PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS($)'/LOCATION: ` 1/A
r1/k., V g'cx S
,`-. IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY
• N SENSITIVE AREA?
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 11 /PS E'ClA® D
f•/ r?. 1.,� 1996
C/ry'3r�ts�VTp�plHlCi
lir
::>L i:DES. >RI 111<::0E'P.ROP..................................... ,::..s.heeta.: n'ecessa ... ............. ...... ........:.....
1
1
I
«;•;;<E `` «'> :` << < ;< ;>;>'>;>;€>;><> < > ;<>`> «'
ili ::r : I�ii:: ::: :;::isi::: : i :::C:::i'::::'� ::iiiiii ; :ii; y j;'::
:i:vi:� . .: : ::is:::Y�iiii::::� <:t: :.::::iiijiiii:. ;{i:j:7ii :
<:: ::�i i;(:;:i;:;:;::ii i;i:::i::i iiiii ii iii i:i::::i g ff:will»: r: in e»«::>:>:�:::»: <:<:>:> :« <;» .:.h•.:.:k ;:..<II " i s n s t a C .s�a...............d.etQ...m... �.... .+� ............................:.......:.....:.
..: ::::::::::::::::::::.:.............C...e.c....a.....a . ...�..t:o....::x.: .:e. ...:..:�.:.a..pP.:: .._::......fY..............................................................................................:..................:::.
_ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION:
_ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $
_ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $
_ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $
_TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $
_ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $
_ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $_
_ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $
(NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $
VARIANCE $
(FROM SECTION: 1 _ PRELIMINARY
_WAIVER $ _ FINAL
_WETLAND PERMIT $
_ ROUTINE VEGETATION •
MOBILE HOME PARKS: $
MANAGEMENT PERMIT $
_ BINDING SITE PLAN $
SHORELINE REVIEWS:
_ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $
_ CONDITIONAL USE $ •
_VARIANCE $
_ EXEMPTION $No Charge _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $
REVISION $
<: :::<::.g::; :>::;:::> >>: ><:<::>:>:_:>«:>::< :>: ; »::: «:::>:>:> :: :_;>:!:°;AFFIDAVITS>OF.`O.W.NERSHI ....................................... ..
I, (Print Name) , declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,_the
authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein
contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
A4 /� ATTE T: Subscri d and sworn to.befor;3 r:e;.a Piotary Public, in and
,, A ;� „ -�!L.14111 .. - fort ate of ' residin;,...
(Name of O --.�Tr.4 : , cr r ,: Bey"of:
L.,
(Signatu-'of Owner/R y jta 'ye) ; `47 y`
,,-`'
(S' nat of No ja 7l )
;. .<si: be . . a ed°6'` C Sta'' � hs ec I t . t .
:> .::;.;:;: ::CIt. :;.1=11e::.Numbet. ;.:: ::.;ECF:;;::•A -HPL. ::.: U:.;:.;.LL ' .. . .::..':F.P.;:. :TP;;:.:;.SPi::;::ifR�fMP......V......................
......::::: ::...:.::... .......
:i:z:::i:::::::;::::.:.::.;::>'::>:::iii:ii::%::::<•zi::>:^'•::ii:;::;:>:ii:::> ;::.iiG: .i:::::i e;::. ;:::i ;. %;; ;::;:<: ii: .. :<:;»'::::;:;::::.i:p;:j:;:::;::}.:yy.;.;i.};•:y;;.:1j:::.;:>:;;:::; :<;. ,;;:::;•<:.:
....... .................. ..................... .................... ...... .......... _. :.;;:;•: :i; .. :::::i:: .;:O!.'::2•;:<;i>:;i;i;•i>::>i::;d::<•:i::•:::•X:,li:;::::;;i:.;i: .
..::. ::...:.: ........::.:::::::..�: ::::..:.. .::::::. :.AA.A::.:W.:..:.FP.. . ... :: ;;:..MHP;<:::i:::SS.P.,: .A...:.CP:. ::::::...�:.:::::::::.�:::.::::::::::::::.:: .:::.::.:: ::: ::::::::.:.
:.>-..!:;:::is•:i: ?::i::::_:::::i::3 i:::ig ::2:::::':::i:'i:::::i:;::i;:;:3� :;:::i::::::'::::::2 i:;
.:..... :.< »:.:;>:;;;;:::
°LiFEE'S< $> > <<»>:> ><< '.:: :: '<': `TOTALP.OSTA E<PR ..
....... ............ .............:............. ..................... .................
REVISED 2/95
Project Narrative:
RPN Comprehensive Plan Policies and R-24(R-14)Amendments
The Residential Planned Neighborhood Comprehensive Plan amendments and the proposed R-14 zoning
were referred together to the Committee of the Whole by the Planning and Development Committee for
clarification of policy issues which the Committtee felt required input from the entire Council. The
Planning Commission finished its review of the zoning proposal on March 13th.
Comprehensive Plan Amendments: (attachment 1)
The major issues for the RPN policies are summarized in the attached staff report which Council received
as part of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments package. Major issues include:
• the 50/50 unit mix
• density change from 8-24 du/acre to 8-18 du/acre
• the number of units in a structure
• the size and scale of multiOfamily complexes
Zoning Code Amendments: (attachment 2)
Major issues in the zoning include:
• size limits of 3 units and 85 linear feet on the"single-family"clusters
• size limits of 6 units and 115 linear feet on the"multi-family"clusters
• bonus provisions which allow up to 4 units for "single family" and 8 units for "multi-family" and
densities up to 18 du/acre
• a menu of project features which developers can select from to achieve bonuses and
• height limits of 30 feet(35 feet 3 stories bonus)
Documents/
Attachment 1
AMENDMENT TWO. RESIDENTIAL PLANNED NEIGHBORHOOD AND
RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS
Purpose: This is a City initiated request to clarify several implementation problems with
the existing policies and to provide better direction to property owners seeking development
opportunities.
The attached policies cover both the Residential Options (RO) and the Residential Planned
Neighborhood (RPN) designations. RO is implemented by R-10 zoning while RPN is
implemented by R-24. Changes proposed for the RO designation are intended to provide
better compatibility with the revised R-10 zoning approved by the Commission and Council
last year.
Background: Several major changes are proposed for the RPN policies. This designation
was created by the City Council to accommodate property owners seeking multi-family
development at 35 dwelling units per gross acre, and the Planning Commission which was
envisioning a smaller scale mixed unit type of development in the range of 18 dwelling
units per net acre. The compromise was 24 dwelling units per net acre with requirements
for a 50/50 split of single family and multi-family unit types, and requirements for
intermingling the units in a "neo-traditional neighborhood" style of development with an
emphasis on creating a single family character for the entire neighborhood. Commercial
uses, civic uses, parks and open space were envisioned as part of projects. Density and
processing incentives were included to encourage accumulation of parcels.
Developer and staff experience in working with the RPN policies and R-24 zoning code
over the last two years allowed staff an opportunity to evaluate the effectiveness of the
policies. Staff found that some of the compromise vision did not work well in the
marketplace and that some of the policies created practical obstacles to development. Staff
also found that the overall concept of encouraging smaller scale multi-family structures and
townhouses designed in a single family style was viable compared with garden style multi-
family development in large complexes. The proposed revisions suggest changes to several
policies with the intention of improving how the designation functions.
Planning Commission Review
At the Planning Commission public hearing consensus was reached on the majority of
issues. Three issues, the 50/50 mix of unit types, the number of units in each building
cluster, and the density will still require additional review. The Planning Commission
voted to support the proposed revisions in a four to three vote. One property owner is
requesting reconsideration of the Commission vote.
Issues Requiring Additional Review
Issue 1. Unit Mix (New Policies LU-57- and LU-61)
The policy question which is before the City Council is: how much multi-family
development does Council desire within this designation? The existing policies limit multi-
Page 1
.. F
family development to 50% of a project. The Planning Commission proposal is to allow a
maximum of 40% multi-family with a minimum of 60% in single family development.
Staff examined alternatives to the 50% cap on multi-family and presented this proposal to
reduce the multi family component to the Commission. The development community
representatives testifying at the Planning Commission public hearing stated that it will be
more difficult to achieve maximum density if the percentage of multi-family is reduced.
The Commission did not deliberate on this issue at length, but approved the change. Based
on additional information which will be presented to the Planning Commission February
7th, staff has now changed its recommendation to support the original 50/50 split.
Issue 2. Building Size (New Policies LU-58 and LU-60)
The existing Policy LU-62 increases building size based on project acreage and master
planning. It allows a range in cluster sizes from 8 units to 12 units per building for multi-
family development. The maximum of a 12 unit multi-family cluster could only be
achieved where a property owner has over 20 acres and processes.a master plan. Current
administrative interpretations limit clusters of single family attached units to 4 units per
structure. The original staff draft of amended policies recommended reduction of these
building sizes. After discussion with developers, staff proposed an additional amendment
which deletes this issue from the policies and defers it to the zoning code for resolution.
Instead of specifying unit size limits the revised policies describe the type of complexes that
are encouraged in this designation using the concept of limiting mass and scale to create a
single family character. The Planning Commission supported the revised version as did the
majority of property owners. This important issue will be reviewed again during the R-24
zoning code re-write.
Issue 3. Density (Policy LU-56)
The existing Policy LU-62 had a hierarchy which allowed an increase density based on
project acreage and master planning. This system is proposed for elimination for the
following reasons: 1) The incentive of granting additional density to encourage aggregation
of parcels was not effective in the market; 2) The master plan requirement was never
clarified in code and duplicates the site plan review process for review of some project
features. The master plan is also not a very effective tool for granting additional density
because it is a review process designed to allow coordination of large parcels or phases of
development. A master plan does not inherently address project features or development
standards which might create eligibility for a bonus; and, 3) The maximum density of 24
dwelling units per acre was not feasible given the objective of allowing smaller scale
structures with a single family character. The development standards. needed to create
smaller scale structures result in development closer to 14-18 dwelling units per acre. A
survey of projects built under the RPN and similar designations in other jurisdictions
(presented to the Commission in the slide show and tour) confirmed this conclusion.
The revised Policy LU-61 establishes the density as 8 minimum to 18 maximum dwelling
units per net acre. This range provides the flexibility to allow a range of development
Page 2
types. Specific thresholds and development standards required to meet the maximum
density will be provided in the zoning code.
Consensus Issues
Issue 4. Dwelling Types (Policies LU-57 and LU-61)
The existing policies lack clarity about the definition of single family unit types. Of
particular concern was how to treat the attached townhouse with or without condominium
ownership. The two proposed policies describe multifamily developments as townhouse or
stacked flats (rental or condominium). Single family development would include detached
structures and ground related townhouses with yards. Single family units would provide
• either fee simple or condominium ownership. Platting of property would not be required,
however, site layout would be designed with yards and setbacks to approximate single
family neighborhoods. A new policy, LU-62 , is proposed to clarify that both single family
and multi-family unit types could occur as condominium developments.
Issue 5. Mapping Criteria (Policy LU-55)
The existing policy includes density criteria, mapping criteria, and a reference to the
feasibility of a 50/50 mix. The proposal separates these issues. Policies about density are
rewritten in the new LU-55. Additional mapping criteria are added to new LU-55 to clarify
that sites eligible for RPN need to be part of a total designation of 20 acres. The 50/50
mix is addressed in Policies LU-57 and LU-61. (See Issue 1)
Issue 6. Concentrations of Multi-family Structures and the Mix of Single Family and
Multi-family
Existing policies LU-43, LU-46, LU-47, LU- 58 and LU-61 included guidance on where
multi family structures were to be located within the project. These policies are eliminated
and replaced with a major revision to LU-43 (re-numbered as LU-44). The new direction
provides greater flexibility to cluster or segregate multi-family and single family within a
project. Unit types would not need to be intermixed but could be provided in clusters of
like unit types. Various units types could be connected through the use of roads, open
spaces, yards, blocks, or civic uses to create a functioning neighborhood. The intent was to
eliminate references to neo-traditional development style but to still provide direction so that
multi-family development would not be completely isolated from single family. The
revised Policy LU-44 is located in the general policies section because it applies both to RO
and RPN.
Issue 7. Intensity of Multi-family Development
The existing policy LU-60 allowed multi-family developments of 8 units per structure when
projects were on parcels sized from 5-20 acres, and allowed bonuses of up to 12 units per
structure if property was over 20 acres and a Master Plan was prepared. The policy intent
was to allow up to 50% larger scale multi-family projects. In response to Committee of the
Page 3
Whole direction to re-evaluate how the multi-family development was handled in this
designation, staff recommended that the multi-family uses be scaled back to smaller
structures described as "small scale multi-family" rather than "garden style apartments".
Small scale multi-family would generally consist of buildings of 4-8 units designed to
incorporate features of single family housing. Garden style apartments generally would
consist of 8-12 unit structures designed in a multi-family style. These larger structures
would no longer be allowed. The specific size limits would be defined in the zoning code.
Policies LU-41 and LU-59 express the revised policy intent.
Issue 8. Miscellaneous Changes to RO, RPN, and General Policies
1. Minimum density is reduced from 8 du/net acre to 7 du/net acre in RO ( Proposed Policy
LU-49)
2. Clarification is provided for dimensions of non residential structures ( Proposed Policy
LU-47)
3. Additional sitting criteria is added to RO (Proposed Policy LU-52)
4. Revised guidelines are provided for ways to address single family character in
development standards. (Proposed Policy LU-53 and Proposed Policy LU-63 in RPN).
5. A new policy is proposed in RPN to guide the siting of non-residential and mixed use
development (Proposed Policy LU-63.3).
Recommendation: Approval of the proposed amendments is recommended to provide a
framework for more detailed revisions to the R-24,code, to eliminate potential interpretive
conflicts with the newly adopted R-10 code and to improve the clarity and focus of the
policies.
•
Page 4
Proposed Revisions to Residential Planned Neighborhood Policies
Objective LU-K: Create new planned residential neighborhoods in areas mapped as
Residential Options (RO) and Residential Planned Neighborhood (RPN) which include a variety
of unit types designed to incorporate features from both single family and multi-family
developments andin a "traditional neighborhood" development style while at the same time
supporting cost efficientaffardable housing, infill development, transit service, and the efficient
use of urban services and infrastructure.
IPolicy LU-4144. Provision of small lot single family detached unit types, ewms er-e
townhouses and small scale multi-family structures should be are encouraged provided that
density standards can be met.
Policy LU-42. A range and variety of lot sizes should be encouraged.
Policy LU-414S. Central place public amenities should function as a focal point within the
development and should include features such as a public square, open space,_park, civic or
commercial uses. center. The central place should include passive amenities such as
benches and fountains, and be unified by a design motif or common theme.
Policy LU-4443. The dwelling types, including detached and attached units, should be
clustered mixed and connected within-throughout the overall development projeet through
the organization of roads, blocks. yards, central places and amenity features to create a
neighborhood with diverse housing typeswhich f unctions en the traditional ghborhood
development .
Policy LU-4541-. Development should occur on a flexible grid street and pathway system to
the extent feasible given environmental constraints, traffic flow and the pattern of existing
development.
Policy LU-46St. Develep-Specific design standards should be developed for residential
structuresheight, width and length of structures, and building clusters based on the
following criteria.
a. height, width and length of structures should be designed to resemble single family
housing, with similar setbacks from the street as single family;
b. parking should be in the rear or side yards of multi-family lots or under the structure;
c. structures should be located on lots to ensure adequate light and air, and views if any,
are preserved between lots;
d. buildings should be massed in a manner that promotes a pedestrian scale with a small
neighborhood feeling;
e. units and entrances of each dwelling unit should be individually distinctive and front
on streets rather than courtyards and parking lots.
f. fences may be constructed if they contribute to an open spacious feeling between
units and structures; and
g. streetscapes should include green, open space for each unit.
Page 5
Policy LU-4750. Non-residential structures may have dimensions larger than residential
structures.- but should be compatible in design and dimensions with surrounding residential
development.
Residential Options
Policy LU-4854. Residential neighborhoods may be considered for the Residential Options
Designation if they meet three of- the following criteria:
a. The area already has a mix of small scale multi-family units or had long standing
duplex or low density multifamily zoning.
b. Development patterns are established.
c. Vacant lots exist or parcels have redevelopment potential.
d. Few new roads or major utility upgrades will be needed with future development.
e. The site is located adjacent to a Center designation.
Policy LU 53. Encourage infill development in designated neighborhoods. The mix of
nits should be based en f .,., lot . nd should be deter.,•ine -by
al^vpliciirc
code.
Policy LU-4956. The net development densities should be 10 dwelling units per acre.
Policy LU-5057. Minimum net development densities should be 78 dwelling units per acre.
Policy LU-5155. Detached& single family housing, _attached townhouses, duplexes,
triplexes, and fourplexes er-up-1e should be allowed in the Residential Options Planned
Neighborhood-designation.
Policy LU-5245. A maximum of 50% of units allowed within an individual RO de-
velopment may consist of attached multi family units.
Policy LU-5359. Development in Residential Options should be compatible with existing
development_ patterns
and bear-e sensitive to unique features and differences among established neighborhoods.
Development&standards should reflect single family neighborhood characteristics such as
ground related orientation, coordinated structural design, and private yards.address, but not
be limited to: 1) building height, width, and length; 2) front, side, and rear yard setbacks;
> ;
' h
Policy LU-5449. Mixed • development ;n the form „f con enienee eeniniercial
• •f ZVllllll Vl talill
Non-residential structures, should be clustered and connected within the
overall development through the organization of roads, blocks, yards other central features
and amenity features to create a neighborhood^llewe,� places of m stei
Page 6 h,
I
I
b
Residential Planned Neighborhood
Policy LU-5560:.
Aareas may be mapped Residential Planned Neighborhood on the
Land Use Map where the site meets the following criteria:
a. adjacent to major arterial(s);
b. adjacent to employment area and/or Centers;
c. part of a designationproject totalingsize over 20 acres (acreage may be in separate
ownerships);
d. site is buffered from single family areas or other existing incompatible uses; and
e. development within the density and unit type range is achievable given environmental
constraints. SF50 MFcn%_ r achiev Te
Policy LU-5660. Density in the Residential Planned Neighborhood designation should be in the
range of 8 to 18 dwelling units per net acre.
Policy LU-5763. Single family development should consist of a minimum of 60% of a project in
the RPN designation. The Ssingle family development in this designation may be
traditional;detached, zero lot line detached. or attached ground related townhouses with
private yards which are designed to reflect a single family character. or a mixture of both styles
Planning Commission Recommendation is 60% Single Family. Staff recommends 50% Single
Family.
New Policy LU-58. (revisions of old LU-62) Single family attached building clusters should be limited
in size so that the mass and scale within the cluster retains a single family character. Limits on the
number of units which may be attached in one cluster should be established in the development
regulations.
New Policy LU-59. (revisions of old LU-62) Multi-family building clusters should be limited in size so
that the mass and scale of the cluster retains a small scale multi-family character rather than a garden
apartment development style. Limits on the number of units which may be attached in one cluster should
be established in the development regulations.
New Policy LU-60. The mass and scale of multi-family components of projects should not preclude
locating multi-family unit types adjacent to single family components.
• b
+ .l d 1 ld g lot nd difF nt s+ d idential stru .
ZIT ilaJ3li Vlfl 4 Jf 4 �
Page 7
_ r
Policy LU-6163. Projects in a Residential Planned Neighborhood designation should have no more
I than 40-0%. multi-family development designed as townhomes, or stacked units.(or rental).
Planning Commission Recommendation is 60% Multi-family. Staff recommends limiting
multi-family to 50% of a project.
New Policy LU-62. Condominium ownership may occur in either single family or multi-family
unit types.
1. Projects of 20 acres or more:
a. Master Plan is required.
b. Residential density of 24 dwelling units per acre is allowed.
c. Multi family buildings may be 12 plexcs or smaller.
2. Projects of 5 19 acres:
units per acre.
ail Multi—family build' ti 1n t ll
•
..� ......... .--......., v.........b,s ...w, ✓✓ a x/a✓�W Vl-Jlli�
b .
3. Projects of less than 5 acres.
a. Density may reach 10 dwelling units per acre.
b. Multi family buildings may be four plexcs or smaller.
Policy LU-63. Single family townhouse development should provide either condominium or fee
simple homeownership opportunities.
'ng additional criteria.
Policy LU-63.152. Buildings should front the street rather than be organized around interior
courtyards or parking areas. "
Policy LU-63.2. Development standards should be developed to address developments in the
Residential Planned Neighborhood designation. Sstandards should reflect single family
neighborhood characteristics such as ground related ,.-:entation, coordinated structural design,
private spacesyards and amenities,public amenities, ground related orientation,a4 screened service
areas public ameniti and access to public services.
Policy LU-63.3. Mixed use development in the form of small scale civic and commercial
development, or other non-residential structures, may be allowed in the central places of
developments subject to compliance with criteria established through development regulations.
Page 8
'::RE g
4=3: .`=7�``R=>" 4< .. ES DEN:TI . L<USE'l6IIAXIMUM.:1.4:U.N..ITS<;PEI�< 4:CR . ..
/::::6 '` > `y '" '+ t 'z '' <3'' 2 '' <
A. PURPOSE: The purpose of the Residential Zone -.14 Dwelling Units Per Net Acre (R-14) is to
encourage development of new residential neighborhoods., that provide a mix of detached
dwellings, semi-attached dwellings, and attached dwelling structures which are organized and
designed to combine characteristics of both typical detached single family and small scale multi-
family developments. Structure size is intended to be limited in terms of bulk and scale so that
the various unit types allowed in the zone are compatible with one another and can be integrated
together into a quality neighborhood. Project features are encouraged such as attractivo yards
for private use, common open spaces and landscaped areas which enhance a neighborhood
and foster a sense of community.
Civic, lenity-and limited commercial uses may be combined with residential development
when they support the purpose of the designation.
The R-14 Zone is intended for areas that are designated as Residential Planned Neighborhood
(RPN) on the Comprehensive Land Use Map.
B. Permitted Uses:
•
1. Primary:
a. Residential Uses
(1) Detached dwelling units.
(2) Semi-attached dwelling units, limited to 43 units maximum.
(3) Modular Homes
(4) Designated manufactured homes
(5) A cluster of up to three attached ground-related dwelling units (e.g.
townhouses, row houses), provided that building length does not exceed 8580
feet
(6) Group Homes II (maximum of six[6] residents).
(7) Adult Family Homes.
b. Non-Residential Uses
(1) Utilities, small.
(2) Temporary uses.
2. Secondary Uses
a. Residential uses subject to the following conditions:
(1) townhouses designed in larger structures than allowed as a primary use,
(2) stacked flats,
{Aycaxcage'mse,i>.I rrutOcjta pAtOw gf � ...............................................................
................................. .... .
(4) combinations of townhouses and flats in one structure.
All residential uses shall be subject to the following conditions:
• These unit types shall not exceed 50% of the permitted units in a
project.
• Buildings shall not exceed 6 dwelling units per structure, except as
provided in section 4-31-7-D2d, Bonuses.
•
•
3 4.. ..
SIDFNTIA.L.USE::MAXINJUM.1, „4: ILVI ITS.PER...A.....CRE......::
3/1419
...1:3tti�ii: s> �l>:
.......:,.:................1w.yew'................. ............. . . ...eet::ft�::�e: r::<»::<>:<>:>:<:>>::>::�:>:::><>:::�:::<:»::::::»::::::>::>;>::>::>;::,:
vru•...:.....:........•.........:.:Gl...•......:.........•.•............:.::::rv.vv....ww::m•::::�m:x:::::.:v:::r •:.w:x:ri•i.Gi$ki•:ii{•iti niti•:i:1•::.::i:.:i:•ii:i:::•:iriti:4:i:ii:
b. Non Residential Uses
(1) New community gardens subject to the following conditions:
(i) Administrative approval under the Site Plan Review Ordinance for
new neighborhood gardens with area smaller than ten (10) acres.
(ii) Hearing Examiner approval, under the Site Plan Review
Ordinance, for new neighborhood gardens which area ten (10)
acres or larger.
• c. New Neighborhood and Community Parks subject to:
(1) Administrative approval under the Site Plan Review Ordinance for new
neighborhood parks with are smaller than ten (10) acres.
(2) Hearing Examiner-approval, under the Site Plan Review Ordinance, for new
neighborhood parks which are ten (10) acres or larger.
(3) Consistency with the City of Renton Parks &Trails Master Plan
d. New public or private elementary and secondary school portables, up to four (4)
per site and subject to site plan review.
e. Civic Uses:
(1) Community Meeting Hall
(2) Senior Center
(3) Recreation Center
•
All Civic Uses shall be subject to the following conditions:
• Be provided in conjunction with residential development.
• Created as a focal point for the development.
Designed to include a common motif or theme.
f. Recycling/Collection Stations subject to the following conditions:
(1) The recycling/collection station is accessory to a public or quasi-public
use.
(2) The recycling/collection station is portable and temporary (not to exceed
ninety(90) calendar days out of each year.
(3) The recycling/collection is not located on any public right-of-way unless
a right-of-way use permit is granted by the Board of Public Works.
(4) The property owners or managers shall keep the area surrounding the
recycling/collection station maintained and clear of debris.
Include a design motif or common theme.
2
31,:i ::.: .. :41;i.:RL IDEN:�`I L` ::,>:S,;•>«;>:::::A:;»:>> VIU::: 1 ` / :S> .:.>:ER<<': C.
7R. 1::..::..::......:S.:....:.......:...:.T..... :USE MAXIMUM.. .4. UIVaT.....:...P.........:::.::A R....::::.::::::
3/4.4196 > >> < > > >> ``> > > KI:; : > < > » < < > ` > <'' > ineilMPia iniMPia0;<
h. r-uses:
3. Accessory Uses:
a. Household Pets consistent with Section 4-31-37, Animals.
b. Building/structures and uses normally associated with and ancillary to residential
dwelling units and located on the same lot as the residential dwelling unit.
c. Home Occupations, consistent withsee Section 4-31-19.G Home Occupation.
d. Family Day Care licensed by the State of Washington.
4. Administrative Conditional Use:
a. Bed and breakfast homes (four[4] or fewer guests per night.)
c. Retirement residencos. •
bd. Utilities, medium.
5. Hearing Examiner Conditional Use:
a. Churches, synagogues, and temples.
b. Community Facilities "
c. Convalescent centers and nursing homes.
d. Day Care Centers.
e. Group Homes II with seven or more residents.
fg. New public or private elementary and secondary schools.
gh. Expansion of existing public or private elementary or secondary schools by the •
addition of permanent structures, resulting in an increase of the size of school
facilities of more than ten percent (10%).
hi. New regional parks, new trails and open spaces.
•
i}. Utilities, large.
jk. Commercial Uses: Commercial uses listed in this section are permitted only in
conjunction with and intended to serve primarily the surroundinaprimary R 11
residential development. Such uses are subject to development standards
described in Section 4-31-7.D.
(1) Convenience markets (no drive-through services)
(2) Laundromats (no drive through services)
(3) Eating and/or drinking establishments (no drive through services)
I users-zas--identified in the Conditional Use Ordinance, Section 4 31 36. (Ord. •
39394-1-645)
•
•
<`R-14: RESIDEINTIAL USEM.. �IMU .1.. ::.. , ?::>[ -31-7A X...:.:.:..:...::M.:::.�....4..::.UN.I.TS,::PERA... CRE::?.;:::.::.:
C. PROHIBITED AND UNCLASSIFIED USES:
Any use not specifically listed as a Primary, Secondary, Accessory, or Conditional Use shall be
prohibited, except those uses determined by the Zoning Administrator to be: (1) in keeping with
the intent of the zone; and (2) similar in nature to a specifically listed Primary, Secondary,
Accessory, or Conditional use.
D. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
1. General Requirements
a. Plats or Shadow Plats All permitted uses may be developed on either: (a)
properties which are platted through the subdivision process; or (b) properties
which are to remain unplatted.
(i) For properties which are to remain unplatted, the development
application shall be accompanied by a shadow plat. For purposes of this
section (4-31-7), "lot" shall mean legal platted lot
and/or equivalent
shadow platted land area. The applicant must demonstrate to the
Reviewing Official that,the proposed development will:
• provide development standards equivalent to those requirements
established in this chapter for yards, land areas, widths, setbacks,
• and frontages.
• provide access and infrastructure to serve the development,
equivalent to those requirements established in the Subdivision
Ordinance.
(ii) Covenants shall be filed as part of a final plat in order to address the
density and unit mix requirements of the zone.
b. Site Plan Review:
(i) All applications including plats require concurrent submittal of a Site
Plan Review application for all proposed and future development
• pursuant to Section 4-31-33 (Site Plan Review).
(ii) Site Plan Review shall be required for all development in the R-14 zone,
except for
(a) New or replacement detached or semi-attached home on a single,
previously platted lot.
(b) Exterior remodeling or expansion of an existing primary residence.
t.:<>::<::::??.:.:.:.;f_c�rtf ac .::' :• a i : ::: r:� re : ::A iitai tig :;;:?;:` ,:vkii!it:--F<:.<:..,.:. .
..r>:.::.:::.:::::•;;:•:•:•::ti.:•.+ ::•<;:;•� :•:':?::..;ti:<;.::?•:;:•::;:t :y;;:?:.;?:.��:::.::tt?::?::::.;•.;:.;:•:?•;.:.;,;:.:•:. :>'•:�:•}� {t� :: ii:•i::•}ii:•�:?�::.}:::?•i k: ::?:ii
. o
d. Sensitive Areas: See Chapter Section 4-31-34; Chapter 32, Title IV; Chapter 8,
Title VIII; Section 4-31-35; Chapter 19, Title IV; Section 4-31-31; and Chapter 6,
Title IV of the City Code.'
4
.4 RESID TIAL USE MAKIMUM 14 ITS PER ACRE
e. Signs: See Chapter 20, Title IV of the City Code.
.Av}??%•?:?i?•wy},:n;n}u••?}':::^}%•}}:v}}}}};:.}•v,:yr�ry.w?.�:}}••Y..}:•}:?•}i}}}^}}:.:yn�::n
::::<:::::::>::::>:::::::::::.::..:. jj� atK:<s€'.n '::::#r :::r r r €a�(:ps s::::i iyj�}� :z ♦n� ah 1ne ::::e' cep'
.}:.?:•:•:?{.}:.}}::•i:•i::i;;;ii„I���i�lf, ;l•1�•.•.�.•.�..::::::::::.�:•::::t:::::.�:::::::•.�:::::•::•::::•:.�:::::.�:::::::::/1.`il 1 t{;�1...J :::::::::::•::::•::::::::�.;:..;i/����
_:>:>:>>::>�::>:<::: ci<:�o��::�yytt:�{{:�Q.{��...��,{{� .( .:�+•�j��1.�1. tl�t1 yip �yj( 11�� }1� �y�}
k..:..:...:..................... ..1...i.+!ftl:T?i. 4 :iY�}`S{:M?::1?�Fil'::i/.�k::S#l.�f�Y��}�+;1;� ��:; �r'3:4�.:::::�>:•:•::}:i%::::>:•:•:•>:'t:::ii'ri'r::?:5::•::.^•.:::y;i:S:::
2. Residential Uses To achieve the R 14 objectives of this zone and the RPN
Comprehensive Plan Policies, dwellings shall be arranged in a manner which creates
a neighborhood environment. Development shall incorporate the following features:
a. RequiredProject Features:
(1) Building Location:
Units shall be connected within. an overall development through
1 1 1.
amonity-features
(I) Residential units and any associated commercial development within an
overall development shall be connected through organization of roads,
blocks,yards, central places, pedestrian linkage and amenity features.
Y}i:t:yb:}r.•y.�•.•. {n;N.{nn;.:v'lxr,•}:{x:?;Y„x,{;?.;r,;{rr.:y;.}}:+/xn;w;n;?{.};r�;:.};{.;.:•:.;.};.vn•:y••};r,•:r,•}};?ryi:•::{u:•:+.•}:•:+.•}::}:•:.}}:{?i^+Y?;?r:x{r,.:::.v.}'+i}}}:n:;x{n}}kgvn;{x{.
fir#>"tnt faeei.&f hires Mali;acresie:plttcr#val � t
REWATORRENONVM.ailiiiiialfiriMEiiiiiiEMBIERIBEMBRIERMIKI
R �
...e`':"`:i+ . irr:.((�• oqffiao=ye07fflotommlmiges><: :...::.... .
:i::::: #.......:............�::::�...�::.::::::.:::.:.:•:.�:.::•.�:::.:::•::.:::•::.,•:.
t�3
rZ11:\3 ;t��/{;'d^,F.;j,��` i .=y{�y�hr ��.}c�`�::et�� y{��ipj 1�;j�iy= .�ta�1{:y/:}�.}...,.::>....;.:.:;...::.: :..::..::.::<�:::./�•{.?g�;:::�::>::...
•�I,N,� 1�;C;{1�i{�y�fli��;.�..;{l.f1jtly}1�1;1�Y`,1�{�1 �:j��y1�.:.:.�.....:t„i,�(ulF�igy��xF�l(1{I /�.�.^ff{,.�.l J;��l�:l /y....................................
y�y���F/1��,��,�jf�,��l l.lii;1 /y��
aiS� i ro 1 1{I1 i1� J} anion :ll{ i� i'i'i"1'lll ached Ill l �..1t'1'{111c'"'"J{I; ...K'.
i�?}i:}}i}}:v}:?.}}:::}:}}}}::}}i}:4:}r':::}i'•rvvv:.•vv:j:i}:vi:•i:':].}}::i}}}}:v:�}}::':}}i:'.}}}}}}}:'}}i}:4}:G:ii}i}}}i}i}::}}}}}}:�}i}}}}}}}}:i{.::?:
•
Sri i:ii:i:
'}'"}."lj::+::i::::i::::i::::i::::::::i:::}:yY::::i::::::::i::i:}•::::::::::.::}:v::vsiii}}}}}}}:•}}}}:4}}}':.:gin}'.�::.
:i?::ii::ii::'}:}•i:;}}iX}'}::%':4 ':�'•}'::•}{:•try?y;p::}}}}:?.}}}:;X
i,:i RoR•:.: ::y::::::::.,,•r}:::::.,•:::::::.,+:: r.,•::rr: ;•::}:>::::xx:}:x.:ox::::}>}}}»}x.?.}}:?:•
_(2) Building Height:
I Units shall'be a maximum height of two stories and thirty (30) fee}
Accessory buildings andlor structures shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in
height-N-Q-TE-4-GGIlle-baok-for-m-ere-ctisoU-S-S443117
and-roof-mg
1 1 ,
5
..;::<..1 ' 7R SIDENTI/�L USE.MAXIMUM 14 UNITS PER ACRE: ._..
/14/ .600ig oimim > >`'>>> '< i inoi ig i ><>> "><> >>> > > < << <<'> >> ; gm <<<°' o
(3) Landscaping_-to-pProvide an attractive streetscape
.>y.��:x:??r:??•;••;:?::.;r,..;{r,.,:ra;>k,;{;;::.,:;�::�;••;<,;•,.x:;.,;?.,w.;.:fix.?.,:?•:<??m::,+>rm.,;::...;>y; ,,?:.r+;:a<:?..;;.,,;.,;..;.:.,?::.::..:{;o;?::x::.;.;:..
�� }<�wf!�i�;��r.�s,'a �(i..l� id�:'ai�r�tlt ��:���<�i✓.�I. �rr�r.��rr�.:Q:f:���.. fir.;.;
(4) Parking:
Private garages should be sited so that thoso facilitios can be limited in
number per facade. Whoro feasiblo, v+&ibility of thoso strusturos is
preferred)
`:.f.;:.,..w.;.r,.yr :::v,:nos t.,.w?.yw..�,r..,:;•{.a;>':..; „yy..,, ,,y?.2, •:•'c:•:•:�i+r;:•:;• x•:::n:•• r.Y.,,,•.*.•C *•
??au??{?:?a:<:•'. ;•. i2:i :;::iii:: ::':::{�.• aab"'.:c:2'c'•i:<::: E':,wa+�'.:t?t'?w:.1i:?:..,a.:::,,,??,k.k:::::i�:�'?'i'k2wi•',''''wr''''.•kt£ d:.:,2uhi'w s4'
�...wxr�f;,,..r{x,•{{{{?{:�..:';:?;r,.�'::;?{»?»»?r,:;»{?r•. „»?.v{»:,{..•,:••{.»»»{{»»:;{?{..;r,:.?+'»??»??{?r,.:x»»:.:;:!•:;!r{{{{ar:?a;<•::;{;.;??;•r,;t;;?r?»{r,.
•:•�.,{�:;},h,F??;r•::;.:•:•.v.,....rr:::x::x:vxr•rr•:.1.};;};::{x.»!px:^..,'r"rrwn;:{,y{{n•:y,{nw:•:?r{.yy,{{{nr{{�:�i:::x}:;{n;r:;}}};•:?;:y{;:;:!•i,',++.;}:{•:?:{'.•Y.
i ca dg ` g s� l i pro"dN�Iif2 s gi s i per tifit:<: ,
..n....xn.,;in•A r ..•.w:::::r:r.r:xf:::v::i:•i$i 'i1i::$:: iiri::•.?:•ii:::v$:::•i'i:4:::•%
x:;;,;.��,n;�?p};{{......:::,.v,�.y;;?y{w{r.:•{;?4:?n:;.w;m;;.•.}yr{{n;.v,??{n;rn;.:??:6:??•:rJ.•:4:?x{ny::xx?:x,:.;.}:+,.;;:?.yx{n;.:};xrxn:?r�vxr.:•:r.
(5) Building Height:
•
Units shall be a maximum height of two stories and thirty (30) feet,
except that secondary uses developed under Section 4-31-7.D 2 d.,
Bonuses, may permit additional height.
•:;}}'f,1?;:;:i�:{;'{N i...ry.,.,:.xxxx{r;{r,.;;}..:.;?;},w,,.}v;.}v{.•{.:}};x{x?rgw.;•;{i;::;{{.ii::x{.;;:{•yr„xq}:•:?ir?.;.••y:;?ri:H.x,.}i;r v:•••:.i:•:+'r.•:•Y.¢+C•}'{:{
b. Number of Residential Structures Per Lot: One residential structure and
associated accessory buildings for that structure shall be permitted per lot,
except for residential buildings legally existing at the date of adoption of this
ordinance.
c. Dwelling Unit Density:
•
Minimum Density:
(1) Dwelling unit density shall not be less than eight (8) units per net acre.
(2) Exceptions to minimum density may be granted by the Reviewing Official
based on the criteria established in Section 4-31-5E. (R-8 Exceptions)
Maximum Density
•
(1) Density shall not exceed fourteen (14) dwelling units per net acre
EXCEPT that density of up to eighteen (18) dwelling units per net acre
may be permitted, if such development can be achieved in accord with
Section 4-31-7.D.2d.
6
4-31-7R 14: ESiObaTIALIUSEMAXIMUM 14 vnr1TS PER ACRE
d. Density and unit size bonus
1. Purpose
The bonus provisions are intended to allow greater flexibility in the
implementation of the purpose of the 'R-14 designation. Bonus criteria
encourage provision of aggregated open space and rear access parking
in an effort to stimulate provision of higher amenity neighborhoods and
project designs which address methods of reducing the size and bulk of
structures.
Applicants wishing such bonuses must demonstrate that the same or
better results will occur as a result of creative design solutions than
would occur with uses developed under standard criteria.
2. Permitted Bonuses: The following bonuses may be achieved
independently or in combination,
(a) Bonus Densities: Dwelling unit density may be increased from a
maximum of 14 units per net acre, to a range of 15 - 18 units per
• • net acre. Densities of greater than 18 units per net acre are •
prohibited. •
(b) Bonus Dwelling Unit Mix/Arrangement: Dwelling units permitted
per structure may be increased as follows:
(1) Primary Uses: A maximum of four units per structure, with a
maximum structure length of 10095 feet
(2) Secondary Uses: A maximum.of eight units per structure with
a maximum structural height of 35 feet three [3] stories and a
maximum structural length of 115105 feet.
3. Bonus Criteria:
a. To qualify for one or both bonuses, the applicant shall provide
either:
niMit , f git;§ 5 ' ';,V, �, fir tea'of 014,M: s
h::`.£;;'.••':#lSi����4F��?��i�i2 �. �4'�f�4Fl��«!SS�'�:L?:�i.i:''i;:ii:;:;i:::i:?5:::SSS::::: ;a:;:>:::.'•:;:2%:>` 'a;ri?ciii:ii
iiiiiliggAMPSINUM454.490.MiSMOMMONFORMiiHRFNE
(2) Civic Uses: as listed in Section 4-31-7 B.(2) Secondary Uses
which meet development standards in Section 4-31-7.D3.
(a) Community Meeting Hall •
(b) Senior Center •
(c) Recreation Center, or
If tte net d eicpabfe area of the •
...........
7
-:7::; 3i.,:1.4..;:.RE
4....:.::.: . :
� � Sl..:..::.:.. NTIAL USE.MAXII.�II.UM:.;t.:.4..:.:UINITS PER ACRE ......
u
Structures such as kiosks, benches, fountains and ,
maintenance equipment storage facilities are permitted
provided that they serve and/or promote the use of the open
space.
To qualify as common open space an area must meet the
following conditions:
(a) Function as a focal point for the development.
(b) Have a maximum slope of ten percent.
RaiiinafitilititkiiiiMigWitittOte2VOMexagjt:fo ::::>tr:aiis::::::or P
::;corridors: ::»>::::::::?::;: :.>
(d) Be located outside of right-of-ways
(e) Be improved for passive and/or active recreational uses
which conform to Section 4-31-7 B2g. Open Space Uses,
(f) Be improved with landscaping in public areas,
(g) Be maintained by the homeowners association if the
property is subdivided, or by a management organization
if the property is not subdivided,
finEMENNEMENEMEMIORIMONNEffifarManiga
b. Developments which qualify for a bonus shall also incorporate a
minimum of 3 features selected from the improvements options as
described below:
(1) ArchitectualStructural design which incorporates enhanced
building entry features (e.g. varied design materials, arbors
and/or trellises, cocheres, gabled roofs)
(2) Active common recreation amenities such as picnic facilities,
gazebos, sports courts, recreation center, pool, spa/jacuzzi.
};?:•°.;iiis ;�teY?.',tt.,,P.,"�b„n,iA tt�„t,'tf,i„i1TI� T15i(,,,, Y,v1�„n( ',Ti;y�Y:7i,,, 1",iogg tit ,Y`It
offloOmoo Yf•, r<<YYft:tf'.'t,*�ti ,r, 'rro 'r7�t?art'Y Sr Fti4'r'ko,p r,l:,f`,i 'e
mataimitignomistreamtumeggsmostailioni
Eggi000leadottitommosiiiiiiingigiiiiiNisliiiiiiiiimisomminglilleiiii
:<' kae <"*Mi:.:,.? 'ttgix#` N::::::::EEM::::>:tfiaEre. .MTRINal.
::::::;=:e iaretot:::l +::::tape€se t <:ar e:idEItiE?MTgeti:fi r v :»<EE
(}:i :i ii?<: f.g.1 : kta4??.a ? 'aaao: eo :•»ii.a:.^.t :eas :?:•?}?ivi??Qv3:•:.v
0
?:i •4{?vkivI: yYryv aiie iferl d}¢ ke{ s m w:hfrFdea
mi Fi€i"" i (igimii '>':f3 itef#ia: :<::::: 1 iiii ki . : iK
isivaiiiidgagetagigivirgaiiissilmosemnoun
c. Review Officialu,,arin„ Examiner approval of bonuses is contingent
upon the determination that the proposed developments are
compatible with site characteristics and are consistent with the
purpose of the R-14 designation and the Residential Planned
Neighborhood policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
8
is A'
MAXIMUM 1: L ,.1 'S. PER,ACRE •
/1.4.
e. Residential Lot Size Width and Depth
The following Table provides standards for lot area, lot width and lot depth:
Table 4-31-7 D 2e Lot size , width and depth standards
•
m m
Primary Units •
detached 3000 30 ft 50 ft.
semi-attached 3000 30 ft 50 ft.
Primary Units • •
attached exterior 2500 25 ft 45 ft
attached interior 2000 20 ft 45 ft
•
•
Secondary Units
attached exterior 2000 20 ft 40 ft
attached interior 1800 20 ft 40 ft
Secondary Units
Flats 1800 50 ft 35 ft
•
•
•
•
• 9
'
�
'
|
�
------------------'______~~, �
f. Setbacks �
i
1. The following Table sets forth setback standards for residential development /
TabYe4-31-7 D 2Jf.1 Setbacks for Residential Structures and Accessory Structures:
ac
PRIMARY USES
Detached and 15 feet 10foet 15 feet 6foet
semi-attached
18 feet when m 1G feet when the lot is
primary structures
sidewalk occurs adjacent tomlower
intensity residentially
zoned property
ALL USES
Corner lots 10 feet for
improved with all pnap|mttmd lots
uses and structures less than 50'
vide
Attached accessory 20feet 15 feet 5 feet oron
structures property line
Detached 15 feet 10foet Within 3 feet ofan 5 feet oron
accessory alley provided m property line
structures minimum 34fee1
cardoqohnu000 mfbaokout room io
provided
SECONDARY USES
Attached 15 feet 10 feet 16 feet 5 feet
townhouses,
15 feet when the lot is 10 feet when
stacked flats,
adiacentto m lower the lot is
carriage houses ^
mvmr3 units and intensity residentially adjacent to a
their accessory zoned property lower intensity
structures residentially
zoned property
2. The following Table meta forth standards for detached accessory structures.
Table 4-31-7D 2'f.2 Detached Accessory Structures
10
'ii:{:;{:L7.7iii R:;�:;:y;:;:%y:j;:;::<:j;:;{:'r::::iY:::::i::i'•i::'r::i:
_ l i::i::y7j:::<:i?::i:::v:::#:::<:i::Fi:::i::::iy::ii::::i::<:iv:::is::;::<:::i::>:::ti:i:::::•ri:::�::i:i:::::i:::::i:yi:i 2:;:;:
<:4..-3:a :714214::RESIb :.. :SE:::: I U ::. : ..:E .. '
.........::..:::::.::::...::.:::...:::.:::..:::......:....:.:....: . lv.�l�#L.:.�1.. . MAX M.. .M. ..�.:.4.: t��nr�TSP R:,ACRE > <>
g. Allowed Projections'into Setbacks:
•
1. The following Table sets forth setback standards for projections into setbacks.
Table 4-31-7D2.g.1 Projections into Setbacks
>::>::>::>:<:>::<..
:>:<;:::::>: TY.:: : :: .::........::..:UISTAN...CEM:mWIDTH: ;::NUMBER:;:.
. ............. .
Fireplace Structures, 24" interior 10 foot 2 A minimum of 10' is required
Bay/Garden windows, setback 30"street max for street setbacksN/A•
Enclosed Stair Landings setback
or Similar Structures
Uncovered Porches•& 24" interior N/A N/A A minimum of 10' is required
Decks 18" above grade setback 30",street. for street setbacks.
at any point along outer setback Fence height to be measured
edge of structure at any • from grade.N/A
point
Uncovered Porches& Property Line N/A N/A Subject to meeting the
Decks not exceeding 18" requirements for Lot Coverage
above finish grade along (see below h.)
outer edge of structure at
any point
Eaves 24" interior . • N/A N/A
• setback'30"street
setback
useA minimum of 10'is
required for street setbacks.
h. Parking: Required.parking per Chapter 14, Title IV of the City Code shall be
provided in the rear yard area when alley access is available.
3. Civic and/or Commercial Uses: Civic uses and/or commercial uses listed in Section 4-
31-7.B. are permitted only in conjunction with and intended to serve residential
development in the R-14 zone. Civic uses and/or commercial uses may be allowed if it
is determined by the City that such uses are:
• designed to serve as a focal point for the residential community:
• compatible with site characteristics;
• consistent with applicable City regulations (e.g. Comprehensive Plan, Site Plan
Review Ordinance);
• consistent with the following development standards:
a. Project Size Requirements:
(1) Civic Uses: The maximum lot area dedicated for civic uses shall be limited
to ten percent (10%) of the net developable area of a proiectpodien of a
property. Building size shall be limited to 3,000 square feet of gross floor
area. EXCEPT that by Hearing Examiner Conditional Use, a single civic use
may be allowed to be a maximum of 5,000 square feet.
•
11
i::::,:::i i::::;.;y7y,R:,{ ..;.:y RESIDENTIAL USE M UCIMU.M. :.:.::�4 UNITS.. .:,.FR.ACRE :.
4..14 �:.::::: ; ; ;g '' <;; ` ' ` ; `;``` ' >' ` ;';; iel i >`migmfi><>' >' `> ><< ><< >>' >>'
5:• yiy-r,.vr,;' r yl.••:. :.:F?;xi 5..:; .:ar:
.... ...:.''#�t:... x�m r .:.a�a:>; fka l< #ii ::> :::>:s n [`e:. e•:.{ :.
.:.::.{.ii':.>:{.:.:;.i:;.i:.ii:;.i:.i•.:.i'.;'.;:.:.i:.ii ii:.:{.:'.i:.;'{.ii r;:::.::::::..i.::::.�:.. :....�::.:.�::..::..,.::::::::::.:: :::.:::..:..:............... ...............::...�.
..:{{;.�:::..: .:.<..,..,.:::•.:v;i:.:{{,:{{.�..::is{;%:{:.N{ .y....iiiw•:;:.i.:..y..;::{.;.;::::: ::;,.:::::.ii•:{:.::r..y:.::.::.v{.:t�.;.i:::{<.,.i:.i::.:::>.y�:>
ii.:7:ax tnbfnei >c ininet�tia ,a. .. yF h ,.:. .... a ..:.:yy...,..ce .{,(.: :.. :,:::01. .:..<>....;::...
i:.ir.i,•i:,;,se,shall bt' frt�(l ect,cr ::p ge—...g.,:°1 .of Ott. t-et.
i•:n}}.i:i.::..:yy:.•.nY:n':.v.•....�::::.:••::::::i::ii"y:Si•i:::::::yi ryy:.^::.iyyi'}iyy"'::n•{:••:.}':::: :::rvi:::::•::::•:.::v:\•:x••y::'vy::::::•y:{•yyyyy'F{•:•y'4Y?i%'1
:: : : devel ablea:l0 ortion�:of a: : •'a:. :{>::: n.....>:. .....,:.r.., :.. :.:....r ...:.i.,..: :::::.::;:.:<•: ;D;
::..:::.�::::::::::::�?::::::::::::::.�:.:::::::. ?�:.::!��,i:.i:.y#��i�€I... :���.sha�(::k:�.:.[1mtt�t#::;C.�;{.�tl�
.i. y{..�...:%•{.:•:i::rr• yy:{iv::::•,:^.:v:.�.vi::i:}ny'.{{�i:4,•wr::}:yy:.y:4.;:•y:;:'yy:y.y'yyY{{:y:{.y:yyi y'::i:i:yyy}i:;:y:�
<:...... qua 1 e c : s::1lot..r:.::::;ar,.ea �..... part.Y.::tzetrn Its:>:fei*.....r nnteiriaf>:rtsea
. 4 {::::.shall:irnel::ors:tr utZ (::: to:::eF>tlie:: sideni a(eetrf n€t:::t?t::a:::rtrt:fe ::s::ocet#pit,d<::X«>n
b. Building Design/Orientation Requirements: All civic and commercial uses
shall provide pedestrian orientation through such measures as: pedestrian
walkways, pedestrian amenities, and improvements which support a variety of
modes of transportation (e.g. bicycle racks).
c. Setback Requirements:.
(1) The following table sets forth Civic and Commercial Setback Standards.
TABLE 4-31-7.3.c CIVIC COMMERCIAL USE SETBACKS
; YP'E:::::::::::: ::::::::::.
:. • :.i:.i:.iyy:.y:.;::.iy:.;:;;.i: .i:.;:.isi:;.i:.;;:.:;.;:.;. ;:.i:.::;:.i::;:.i.i::
. FRONT 15 feet abutting or adjacency to residential development
10 feet frontages for all other development(e.g. non-residential development)
MAXIMUM No maximum front setbacks are required for new structures. For additions to existing
structures,the maximum setback requirements shall be consistent with setbacks provided •
in the existing structures
REAR 15 feet abutting or adjacency to residential development subject to the
provisions of Section 4-31-7.D.3.e below(landscaping)
none frontages for all other development (e.g. non-residential development) ,
SIDE 15 feet abutting or adjacency to residential development subject to the
provisions of Section 4-31-7.D.3.e below(landscaping)
none frontages for all other development(e.g. non-residential development)
INTERIOR 15 feet abutting or adjacency to residential development subject to the
provisions of Section 4-31-7.D.3.e below(landscaping
none frontages for all other development(e.g. non-residential development)
(2) No structures or parking areas for civic 'uses are permitted within the
setback areas.
d. Height Requirements:
(1) Civic uses: Structures shall be limited to two[2]stories.
(2) Commercial Uses: Structures shall be limited to one[1] story and fifteen
Lam]feet.
e. Landscaping/Improvements:
(1) . Street Frontage:
(i)• Lots abutting public streets shall be improved with a minimum ten
[10'] foot wide landscaping strip which is not sight-obscuring.
• • The Reviewing Official may modify this provision, through the site
• plan review process, where it is determined that specific portions of
the required landscaping strip may be developed and maintained •
as a usable public open space with an opening directly to a public
entrance.
(i) Lots abutting or adjacent to residential property(ies), where the
residential property(ies) is located either within the R-14 zone, or
12
... ..3`1'...7.. R..�....RE31DE..�xVIAL. E.
US ..MAXIMUM �4 (�,..TSP ERACRE:� <::
6
within another "Residential" use, shall be improved along the
common boundary with a minimum fifteen [15'] foot wide
landscaped setback and a sight-obscuring solid barrier wall.
The Reviewing Official may permit, through the site plan review
process, the substitution for the fifteen foot [15'] wide landscaping
strip, of a ten foot [10'] wide landscaped setback and a sight-
obscuring solid barrier wall (e.g. landscaping or solid fence), in
order to provide reasonable access to the property.
The solid barrier wall shall be designed in accord with the Site Plan
Review Ordinance and shall be located a minimum of five feet [5'] •
from abutting property(ies) zoned and or designated for
"Residential" use. The Reviewing Official may also modify the
sight-obscuring landscaping provision, through the site plan review
process, if necessary to provide reasonable access to the property.
A secured maintenance agreement or easement for the landscape
strip is required.
(iii) . Lots abutting or adjacent to streets which are designated as
"arterial" in the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Transportation
• Element, shall be improved as described in Section 4-31-7.3.e.1.(ii)
above.
• •
f. • Parking: Required parking per Chapter 14, Title IV of the City Code
Parking areas abutting residential'development shall be screened with a solid
barrier fence and/or landscaping.
g. Surface Mounted Equipment: All on-site utility surface mounted equipment .
shall be screened from public view.
h. Roof Top Equipment: All operating equipment located on the roof of any
building shall be enclosed so as to be shielded from view, including
telecommunications equipment.
•
Outdoor Storage: Outdoor storage, loading, repair, maintenance and work
areas shall be screened by a solid barrier fence or landscaping, or some
combination thereof as determined by the Reviewing Official, through the site
plan review process.
j. Refuse and Recyclables Collection and Storage: All Recyclables collection
and storage, garbage, refuse and/or dumpsters shall be contained within areas
designated for such uses, and shall be located a minimum of fifty feet [50'j from
a lot developed with residential uses. - In no case shall the Recyclables
collection and, storage, garbage, refuse and/or dumpsters be located within the
required setback area. •
The Reviewing Official may modify the location provisions, through the site plan
review process, if necessary to provide reasonable access to the property.
All Recyclables collection and storage, garbage, refuse and/or dumpsters
except for access points, shall be screened by a fence or landscaping or some
• combination thereof.
E. APPI ICATION R�}EW REQUIREMENTSS
� rsrr�arc��vrc--rc �cvrrc�r
1. Site Plan Review
13
•
•
4 31-7,R-14 RESIDENTIAL USE MAXIMUM 14 UNITS PER ACRE>> >
,
E . EXCEPTIONS:
•
1. Pre-existing Legal Lots: Nothing herein shall be determined to prohibit the
construction of a dwelling structure and its accessory buildings on a pre-existing legal lot
provided that all development standards listed in Section 4-31-7.D. for this zone can be
satisfied.
2. Pre-existing Residential Structures: Residential structures) that exist or that have
•
been vested for land use permits prior to the effective date of this ordinance shall.be
considered to be conforming structures. Such structures may be replaced, renovated,
and/or expanded pursuant to the provisions of Section 4-31-7. .
FM CONFLICTS: In the event that there is a conflict between either the provisions of this
• Ordinance, or a conflict between this Ordinance and provisions contained in other ordinance(s),
the Zoning Administrator shall determine which ordinance shall prevail based upon the intent of
the zones. Life, safety and public health ordinances are assumed to prevail.
•
h:kliv\p&ts1pIn\zoning\r-18-2 .
•
•
•
14
Ci OfRenton: :• ,
Y
:: EN:V/RONMEN;T :.
:���E� `[LI • T
•
PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all
governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making
decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals
with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. . The purpose
of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from
your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to
help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your
• proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the
environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS.
Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best
description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge.
In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or
project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if
a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply".
Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some
questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark
designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental
agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them
over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that
will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you
submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information
reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
•
USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered
"does not apply. " IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT
ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the
references in the checklist to the words "project, " "applicant, " and "property or site"
should be read as "proposal, " "proposer, " and "affected geographic area, " respectively.
R14CHKL.DOC
City of Renton Environmental Checklist Project Name
March 11, 1996 Page 2 of 14
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
R-14 ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS
2. Name of applicant:
City of Renton, Planning and Technical Services Division
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Rebecca Lind, Senior Planner
Long Range Planning
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
277-2475
4. Date checklist prepared:
March 8, 1996
5. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Renton, Department of Planning/Building/Public Works - Development Services
Division
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
????
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
No, we do not have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related
to this proposal.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal.
No environmental information has been or will need to be prepared for this non-project
application.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
No applications or other proposals, pending government approval are covered by this
proposal.
10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if
known.
No other governmental approvals or permits will be needed for this non-project action.
R 14CHKL.DO C
•
City of Renton Environmental Checklist Project Name
March 11, 1996 Page 3 of 14
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the
size of the project and site.
This proposal is to amend the existing R-24(PNR) zoning code and replace it with the R-
14 zoning code.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project,including a street address,if any,and section, township,and range if known. If a proposal would
occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan,
vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the
agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to
this checklist.
N/A
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other
N/A
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?)
N/A
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel,
peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and
note any prime farmland.
N/A
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
N/A
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill.
N/A
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
describe.
N/A
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after
project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
R14CHKL.DOC
City of Renton Environmental Checklist Project Name
March 11, 1996 Page 4 of 14
N/A
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if
any:
N/A
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust,
automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the
project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities
if known.
N/A
b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal?
If so, generally describe.
N/A
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
N/A
3. WATER
a. Surface Water:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,
state what stream or river it flows into.
N/A
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)
the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available
plans.
N/A
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in
or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
N/A
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give
general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
N/A
R14CHKL.DOC
City of Renton Environmental Checklist Project Name
•
March 11, 1996 Page 5 of 14
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location
on the site plan.
N/A
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface
waters? If so,describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
N/A
b. Ground Water: •
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground
water? Give general description,purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
N/A
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial,
containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the
system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served(if applicable), or
the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve.
N/A
c. Water Runoff(including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. •
N/A
2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally
describe.
N/A
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water
impacts, if any:
N/A
•
4. PLANTS
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
N/A deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
R14CHKL.DOC •
City of Renton Environmental Checklist Project Name
March 11, 1996 Page 6 of 14
N/A evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
N/A shrubs
N/A grass
N/A pasture
N/A crop or grain
N/A wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk
cabbage, other
N/A water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other
N/A other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
N/A
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
N/A
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
N/A •
5. ANIMALS
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or
are known to be on or near the site: •
Birds:hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other N/A
Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other N/A
Fish:bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other N/A
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
N/A
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain
N/A
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
N/A
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to
meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for
heating, manufacturing, etc.
R14CHKL.DOC
City of Renton Environmental Checklist Project Name
March 11, 1996 Page 7 of 14
N/A
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe.
N/A
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if
any:
N/A
7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur
as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
N/A
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
N/A
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if
any:
N/A
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for
example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
N/A •
•
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with
the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come
from the site.
N/A
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
N/A
S. LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
N/A
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
N/A
c. Describe any structures on the site.
N/A
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
R14CHKL.DOC
City of Renton Environmental Checklist Project Name
March 11, 1996 Page 8 of 14
N/A
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
N/A
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
N/A
g. if applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the
site?
N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area?
If so, specify.
N/A
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
N/A
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
N/A
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
N/A
I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
N/A
9. HOUSING
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
N/A
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? indicate whether
high, middle, or low-income housing.
N/A
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
N/A
10. AESTHETICS
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;
what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed.
N/A
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
N/A
R14CHKL.DOC
City of Renton Environmental Checklist Project Name
•
March 11, 1996 Page 9 of 14
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
N/A
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it
mainly occur?
N/A
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with
views?
N/A
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
N/A
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
N/A
12. RECREATION
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinity?
N/A
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
N/A
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
N/A
13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally
describe.
N/A
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
N/A
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
N/A
14. TRANSPORTATION
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
R14CHKL.DOC
City of Renton Environmental Checklist Project Name
March 11, 1996 Page 10 of 14
N/A
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance
to the nearest transit stop?
N/A
c. How many parking spaces would the,completed project have? How many would
the project eliminate?
N/A
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing
roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate
whether public or private?
N/A
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
N/A
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
N/A
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
N/A
95. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example:
fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally
describe.
N/A
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
N/A
R14CHKL.DOC
City of Renton Environmental Checklist Project Name
March 11, 1996 Page 11 of 14
16. UTILITIES
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse
service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
N/A
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate
vicinity which might be needed.
N/A
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is
true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any
declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist
should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my
part.
Proponent: &c6leediriA0
Name Printed: Rebecca Lind, Senior Planner
Date: t104c, , l4 1`lilt
•
•
R 14CHKL.DO C
City of Renton Environmental Checklist Project Name
March 11, 1996 Page 12 of 14
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans
and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with
the list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of
activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a
faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;
production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of
noise?
This proposal will not increase discharge to water, emission to air; or increase the
production, storage and release of toxic or hazardous substances; or increase the
production of noise because there is a negative change in capacity for potential uses or
increased development activity.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
None
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
This proposal will have no additional affect on plants, animals, fish, or marine life beyond
the current or previous development potential.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
None
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
This proposal will not cause depletion of energy or natural resources beyond the existing
potential of the afffected zone (PNR).
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
None
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas
or areas designated(or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such
as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species
habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
The proposal will not use or directly affect the environmentally sensitive areas or areas
R14CHKL.DOC
City of Renton Environmental Checklist Project Name
March 11, 1996 Page 13 of 14
designated (or eligible or under study) for government protection; such as parks,
wilderness, wild-life habitat areas, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered
species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands
because none are in this zone and the amount of developed area is unchanged from the
existing development potential.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
None
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including
whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans?
The proposal will not affect land and shoreline use except to provide greater flexibility
and range to redevelop.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
None
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
This proposal will not increase the demands on transportation or public services and
utilities beyond current or previous development potential.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
None
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal
laws or requirements for the protection of the environment.
None
SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is
true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any
declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist
R14CHKL.DOC
City of Renton Environmental Checklist Project Name
March 11, 1996 Page 14 of 14
should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my
part.
Proponent: gl.C1`,C(eU /I
Name Printed: gthe,rect 4 Li,) •
Date: G !,(,(AG&. Itt Wo
R14CHKL.DOC
0622059049 J622059051
KROHN GLADYS M ALLDREDGE RICHARD W+R CAROL
9235 S 192ND 13630 SE 180TH
RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058
0622059061 0622059098 0622059143
GALLAGHER DONALD J DENNIS DONNA MAE STYNER LORRAINE A
19225 TALBOT RD S 9211 S 192ND PO BOX 1232
RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 BELLEVUE WA 98009
1023059009 1023059011 1023059012
ORCHARDS,DIVISION I,THE G M ASSOCIATES WENDALL FLETCHER
ALSO 9010,062,067,131,088 GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO 380 E 4450 N
ADV 96 DEP PD $66,618.88 9125 10TH AVE S PROVO UT 84604
1997 PLAT NEW MAJOR 640350 2 SEATTLE WA 98108
1023059032 1023059034 1023059036
TIBBOTT DEAN W&ANNE 0 MERLINO GARY+DON HERTEL MICHAEL J
17003 NE 28TH PL 9125 10TH AVE SO 14012 SE 126TH ST
BELLEVUE WA 98008 SEATTLE WA 98108 RENTON WA 98055
1023059066 1023059070 1023059080
G M ASSOCIATES . DYKEMAN ROBERT E LA BLANC RAYMOND A
1560 140TH AVE NE#100 14029 SE 124TH ST 11621 SE 47TH PL
BELLEVUE WA 98005 RENTON WA 98059 BELLEVUE WA 98006
1023059086 1023059088 1023059100
CORBELLA BERT&LAURIE A MERRICK ANN G WINDSOR APARTMENTS
12625 195TH PLACE SE ADDRESS C/O R E T S
ISSAQUAH WA 98027 UNKNOWN 0 3801 150TH AVE SE#300
BELLEVUE WA 98006
1023059123 1023059125 1023059208
DYKEMAN ROBERT E MEAD HENRY L WOOD SYLVIA L
14029 SE 124TH ST 12424 142ND AVE SE 12255 142ND AVE SE
RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98056
1023059291 1023059375 1623059012
BUSH LYLE L+SUSIE A HICKS ANNE FIE PUGET SOUND POWER&LIGHT CO '
14030 SE 126TH ST 20548 SE 159TH PROPERTY TAXES
RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 PO BOX 90868
BELLEVUE WA 98009
2123059003 2123059040 2123059055
PARKER C A CITY OF SEATTLE ROYAL HILLS ASSOC
15822 SE 369TH ST SC 486190 0 2810 EASTLAKE AVE E
AUBURN WA 98002 SEATTLE WA 98102
2123059067 2123059068 3123059022
MORGAN DAVID F B+E FINANCIAL INC VICK ALUN E
335 E MAIN ST %PATRICK EASTER 4827 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH
AUBURN WA 98002 18000 PACIFIC HWY S RENTON WA 98055
SEATTLE WA 98188
7 It.- . vcDP r %wafgs' D' Amu
ea lugex bees $ 2351
. b mv 89-032: I-14 IJEXOIIE
Tweoo
1 - � 7
0 900 reoo
/A l [ I 1 l 1 I l l I l l l 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I II I1� �'l ,a*tiF�n
Li"y' � •w1' ' �'r:R11 1 —I • on i:1����Tf1;�� ,�� �♦jfOiiYliYr
1 kit , N( . , I rata**id 010 ef4V one r:,
r 44.4., jOh - illig" ma Vek,0
wt. As Al . , ,s 00011011 /v atoor
NA� 000 0 Welk
i ♦�` Q r���'��:�� i4 i►4
rf
:Ns �h ��+�♦ . �*** ♦���,ir k ". 4 .* • V-t, ���
0 / #''. 4`.' tittlfbVir r -
,„,,,./et:. _.,.
.0 iirg. Ila
AS 4" vto tv 04 08 • to 4p
• 49174•404votiolso vo at,• I., # •
..,0_ , #._„,. oks.
v � pi 4,-
♦ `,1
,4111 p1. .4 . 1
�e,\ Z ot- 2E v. l#4
.440 \'')
- - i i
/ \ \ % AN, .
wit 4
ea It Ayr-
air
At
•
I -
i i i ae ovd I I I I I I adV)1011d rzy I I I I I I Oe1v)1aVd
IL SW 41st St I C
la
vuomr
/ lw 43r.W 167 creZ"\C-----
4
3�d St
1
-1_____ P,Ill
�
�� 45t gm
. ~
1 a
< r.
�% I 1 I -
I
•
T _ mop
iNg
_i- -
re
/ ..%�
S,
0 800 1600
ii I
1:9,600
0: LONGRANGE PLANNNG LUA 96-035: R-1 4 REZONE
+
+
Works
MDFlor�.I L MacOni., V' ilu
,��• ..
25 March 1996 Index Page # 5331
tI \
z — SE 11441[T1( L
- w _ _
ltu1Ii
1 i I
ASP1 ' � - T
u'!Ul'1!L/j1 �ig -- s
- 10th-St
= U VE 10TH St - -
TT
1.
— t 7 _ LL
( I IAl
l rth St
11 .451" ' I 4
...." Nam -
__ 1.„,"
LT_ a
i i►%L "!1I4 It Z�
► 1 ' I lin LL Hui
1 p 9►• -
' I 1 kalligk 1I --
8:3--
•
E 5t S 4%
NE ���i /
4 -- - —-
Vil'
-I
—
IE 4-0- st _ sE stn St —
0 800 1600
1:9,
• : LONG RANGEaris LUA 96-035: R-1 4 REZONE
+ +
+ !Vw _ w rD. Y Id Index Pe # 5310