Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA96-037
• PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN `,,x • sx»- m § R i 3 0 • woo 1 ° xmR.N, viN�E�I IPROJ $ Si EVE 414 \ d` \• \� x0 CORNER 16-23N-5E� q�, W \ \ \� t-..„.___ 0u n G "Wq_ .% r Q 2 Q ---,..„\... / \ ' REN,ON EDLNSI NO (6/Ie�)Ip0 'w Q \� EnSRxC 69rte1 �Y F / Dn CFNiEf! 'P - N g — - VICNRY MAP 0 \ - / NINE M-sa �� \.., ........$ --I =--- i eCAL DESCRIPTION gO a \\ x\ _ —�.�, ,m..® r±H of Ilan No.m3-cs m mad w.iaa cR.m R.wc I. 8' ie W _ n9,ew9ro,.t* apardon00u.Nem:v0,r ofu.Northeast*ter 00°.wmm,owner 006x . '� N. 1 RE -6].6--"6ro--� .. usiER -•EO6 nro Nor..pea.of Sec11m 10.Township 23 North.Range!0006 WI.N Pop Cowes.Wmi:Inqtm. F Z \ Po R —nn nro -�I Nam as 3309 NE.N Street Re:bn,Ym"vq,m M0!° ''''Val—9 m — �\ \�' �,� POLE n„,_/XL - '1 n [_• I _ TO PLANS p \ IA 9'F'.----------PA'". ��/ /\ -H•ea6my Ste PM \ II N 0°•D1'D)'E 280.00' s'•`-� 'm: —� _ A'fanwvy Eme��gDv0w9•P. Z W -R•6nNary Wu�ea F 0 co - °" Nape /Mate O (o W \ • POW elOSn�IEE� n \ BOX y'6 C�.0•rFasl,,,„ A•°L U F L/ { 4 —ryF •• n PEc.NONO a—SOS28 -Y•T1-�nmAlbcma vtl '""�'1 \\\ie PoL 5. I' / 3 ---- — — ---L— --,--- ,a III, su- — Shed -----,ro D-R'mec" a EI"ar"(Canopy) seruan(Meng) ¢ W O / v ��\, 20 ,e ,> 5s .�, --'i V..l.,___ a > . 3 z i --r a serer, F F. D a 6 s .„. f .l _-n.— —�n„__ - ---- ME DATA Z C. 'm.SNlc.c. , �+ \ \ _ ,_ a \ - ----""- ---- -:.a-�.Area. 3.Hsf. U W Z b7—— mg,1 / _ i •. Total-7,504 SF• IIRsEn&fir / / ~ d \i30= .' . „Roi z� G G I J o• ;VEX,' //I7 � mu°�ic -cL'.fie' •Q ._—ver w inwreel-�an-�_ x/" J J Q W //""Es\ I o p a°`mDo<� -x.0 X sn I iaw e,,nstaF.SS.•:4 32 Use 4,o arm S Z 35 6P6:L �. " Nov W PaN.N9we.+6.6(:3anae6am.teR,nea,mae,NaR ta a.� 7 2° /� i, \ i 3R o 6`oz" _ Z Raer,9 DMa.9•a z0(3040s0!b0•, 0 W a 29 / I / i 3T woo �, g • ~ Nergernen ern Proposed:U 30.0• ;,xneH24 / `I V1 --- j I Say u. �" tho% - aasea a.mene ,x>e,w,,AS* 15. m i a s �I - _.� RE r WIIX P/!1t.•• / I°5O NIGX 1U1L RACE \ Ymummn Propow6 N Street Canopy 55' t! Dome - wit �.. i Y I ii2 J1 /\ ,aae.,mal:3(wwaeak nano ss. III 11 + '6•-` L— J \ m .•' NOTES I 32 OILEEIIB- <: - r,nn w coo..tamed x aE b and em. Y Dm. CA9nERf © o s I R. • "�9m�Ida...•oe 5e.e,2. ,0:e6ba ,J 33 F'� �w�UU q �� u �? ri. � ,� I 0 Es10 P]E 510 EC�'� .H Seri.WI(.FACE t n LEGEND F5 Pew. ' it W �� "•, a /rJbgLi$ PoM K - • '—�- -—' 4—.4,1• 260.00 • e c • `n., \ ERN+c r iER x)._. EMT.SIMI CON 0 a Su»M / vvR,R J-e0x E , -c I POWER/ E�Sw.01 = ) H 3'N.' 8 3!'• V 35•dpPEwAT_I • 103, vwLT --- CM R Osi CM Yo I ((( -- ^ _ N»r, aZR WNS MICI u• w ` SS E.ohPr6b POSER -(nM N o \ . « ar.Err.nl.xs• --- sDN»f _xC.. 1. �RL.efPO�x �_ — - —der-- EM6T u,®ERfAdWD POSER m J ele �W au»E 7 sx»-e- NIONROE-AVENUE-NE -mRn«�a6� �w_p x J�" Ex./i0CDNCRErz •::. :. :..:., �N.•DA... i \ —PAT TELEPHONES a0»»-o-/ 5D»x_C • ",i��v I g �b� n� \ PROPOSED A.wwT PAYMENT II ER • »,Owtn/VALVE r l i R:PE SIGNAL �vKSE / PR794D R1E f .:• .. ' •t _itfrI 33 Si TRRENC zwm ,,..66aw"o,b1,n.e.00/1Rit9.6 w2A 6..w., w,. 2.0.-SaSew-T.2540-7. - • III ',4..:;,.• EX A v,tsa H i Yp =... ry«mes ` •,limo II°5I1':II:•':',411/111i.II;•;'14t:;747'::.=1 i " ,v.. - ,p a• I cam .4_y' iqv. 'ap',:,,...=. Rv:".' «..„ .. i .44 . , 4 ' - 3 jr0.r..ir '1;'•'• 9i•- 40 -. ..;._--,..„.r,..,.......—,L4, : 0. ;. , . -� -- ti n 1 n :.J .. .;Y©. a tom`+\ r / :0:1 • ti %0 n 9. • ry'' o.t< I. I. -i*J— XI \1 'N It a I;_,st:t tY � a 1 lfi r' +I 'n \'k \ .' , .t.1 rt L t -t �--- � ....._, r i , --r am t_ • „I t .f©'+' •del --- - - ` ` ' �—IL• IN _ a _ _' — I I' y S�--iilE� ®� t - o I Ws 1 By IG.a I I x.�,.., .b„gym q.GH'4Vys 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH o`•a $4 For We, 5660 mP p\ KE06JNT,WA251-6222 98032 EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION CHEVRON WITH OSR Z (2 AND LAKHA INVESTMENTS NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP mL ENGINEERING. ND PUNNING. „„' 19119 NORTH CREEK PKWY SUITE 101 SWC NE 4th AND MONROE ST.NE „G NVNV8WG.MAMMA'.SExVKES nv'v BOTHELL,WA 98011 RENTON,WA • PRELIMINARY GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN (--- Z ° k-"`III aRM,� o 1•.20• `� ¢ z N. jgrE M 9E CO _ nNR 6/18186) -'-- rv6M PR/'xASNER W, �.�_ __ .- .;� �\ / I�I a RITIL POSITION 6 0-1 ° o OF FISFYEM INOLE --_-. gq \ rover sxoxn ON WIRE HT.ES. --— I Ti 5 SIIr"r'''(SEE —' RPE. No,E,.. ' sW 3 wr w r— --____ w 'NN('\\NT, MD xm aid s \ \5 61'a6�OS E 2.fi3' R I ,M WRE M-63.]a' w CxNNMNN FENCE FOaP)AµPR��MED / -� _�� M Ea —-n__,l��Aa. FROM NORTH k WEST `POLE w / � //�/%%/%% -/ IS PROP CORNERW �� _ wln -"°"---_ z�,_—MS_x y 3 $ O / �Ji(�Illllff�/!/// fi 1 \I BICFlLTFUTION ,OLE" x..la � W ENO REDA W/PU.0 S1YAfE BIOFlLTRARON a C.P•LS,we4 O.•S. ' \\ I I -�-_— " _ WIRE M w 66 J0 // •or w.O 11 _ / /�/ I I I I I I I I I I I I\ \\a'11NNONN ICEI \ \^.. ...-6L'E.OEP90C / / 0{'OY—_� 28000' \ f It�P,o6L -M �pow.r 6=92 ° _ 0 I N Ot _ / I I I I I I I ROM NORM N x)_6916 s� `E«r acNDaa6`_ -R, — « EA,•,E„EN, CO CO / / / I \\ ERasi of iNE kl o-•E."d'.. �R +s 1,�T••- - STORMIER RETEMION REBAR - _ - "o�°s--99�,'6 -.---�____ 0 ~ E1 ® I+,� rtro / / J I I I I I I\�\\ \IX ER E �, A1 ,. b ' 6J = Z Z / I I I I \ v1� R•PROPERTY 7: ,`� r )9'�/ NFlL P'TI,N� I :....���.EIIttE \ O.R I ACCESS •i,% ij , \ � �� � L) IIFT- T aI4 /LI I// _, �,\. I 1I1 ` - .eI o > w• zw I— ¢ 0M-SO s9• \ '...\ I I I J ; ..f.. / DOWNSP�IIT COLLECTOR a I \ I / ,F- V x x\ \ N \ I '�i `1` p ,,,fff"'Irmo / ,. DIRECTLY'TO RET.MT. ® ; II I I� 340.5`-IF' _ Y F J DD 7'C��11. \ / / (BYPas9lBlomA E) — O Ct o 1-W, ---- - o ¢ J ''\ D �.MT: 5�� 1w f'/ 6y� O I o /\ w�SI/ ita. 'lc -J J Q J III IP• r 'Nee \ r /""``' cn lR 7R A. CATCH:• \ /1 _ ¢ O 2 / ti e i ; / RIM=339.. _ CC Z I- LLI1 I I I I Y O ervYcl£ "' / W\ 01 W 0 �, /I' i%///9 4tio'/r'/ i I i l i II \\I// /r , /7�� I, •N�41.51eeosl TRENCH DRAIN - ® Ms ;. \1 / v Z\`1 ••w Cto / Ji I TO ISOLNCH DR I ER REc \ o W '// /%/ /' / o$9 o III I /, cl CANOPY AREA • • xSfoBM F LL // • / r / ; J I I1 I I 'I�\f. 11 I/ e D�'.. 'Al FROM STORMW Tr I I /^/ IL • .. ',',"/',,,,' z/,/'/ /i sA, 1Yo ,Ia Ir ,a� TRENCH DRAIN �I Y / / / // / / s 0 ggER •d'I-e• / TO COLLECT 1 '- 3 '%,// i// / // / 9oylR .' �' 1.... / I1,,,,IR AREA BENEATH 1 ^ ^ �' ///r;%%// // /%i//® I .ftn�.TERa C1wrv0un P�"e/ �\ YJ -A �■-....._ -��� _7 ONE , L O CONOPY i,\ f { .N z .i / ' +++EPEE }TIE E �+ vim'• E 341.' 'J �jI ^ (DISCHMGE TO 1__ .' 1 - -/1 �-1 54N.6.EHER) !le'a , . / //// :FENCE CORNER IS/ ' nI \'/ CAT LTS + 341.5 I i6-a J l- NT H A� a ICI, III I oP PROP oRN R I I a�Cl(}1 SLOG. ,a� - .. I " s $ / // .//j r/r I I L" / -,� I RIM FlN34FLR I. rQl��,b OIL/WATER,, R I $ I d $� j! o n Purvcx w n s=740'9 • j{f`• I I , I Q SEPARATOly - /i �; �'', USwEs E ` OP R 341.4 i TO SAY✓' .. - //// / �—*' / e.• I RIOCE !�y I SE�R rv.l� �fl FS '7/;// RSr E '\,v - •-�-j 341.9.1t III W O�N\__ i99UTA mRx,F \ i / o vl /7//j//r--�.,�--µ, ._ 1 � �i fl \ 4 rovnaN { I °'.E j �v H 0 vouLi _ate 1.5 FAO 340.5 "'m —-- M —_ 9x0fE wIU(E SimPE -254 y /,�• /l M P ..... MT E _� L _ LI -SSMx-C SMX� RR / SINIXE WMnC STRIPE n 3 N ry a d OOU&E 6MRE ' __ �SOM NORM 1/4 16,3N-SE m r... $Y;; rEuu�—T'i G_ '.\ - ——_DOUBLE,'LUOW sow sM �I cl yi"�w r iRON'uo cTM`:' E - ••" S SEM-,1 fy uMx_e7 'FAONROE aVENiiE NE D ' R �x'oN AS � NM.,602 �_ ;OMN_ / x E - ION • M R`I LL ,�N,'R rp v-"uOc t - 1;t-0 HYDRANT,./ PE �C \ $wy 5.GRGRb (' \ DOUBLE %2 5 R -M 1 .4- 4.- V. i ','„,:,Ng'.-Z. POLEwR_ +J.' 8 6 . Ew=29 az O . s O O POLE WAl m 5 6 m I EREi o -9J co b NIVEP I. n.5660P0R $l./r....03/10/1090 0032 scow 1.20 soon Wood Wow :5000-6.2.5060-025669-a PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN " III V=20' -. •,"Vas,4D • D ss� DRA NW 14 w .. ______ ___III g ,. t1N, mo /CAP \\ r OFs.Hs�oi'PRa cS /11..."-WIRE F, Err--^w__ ` 5r I- e,ROs[u�[wr°i E'"rnwrCO `"'E" —n„ rcoxE. Q _— r 044 ca•.!;,"r N,a- FWn� w �n'°vZG-� .—...�� — II �k.- -.•+,—_ A Birk \, w•D°•x 1/ P.M POLE ® _�,_— „_.°o- Z W o aiazis°[" 1.1 x l !x I t! I �j iq 1 1pp��I t rrr 4 i e.r1111.� .w Ifs' - i - uo osPsl EnsEwc�„ wx[. ov O co �II�1% t!t_�t; +ti.iai,,,s, r! �6taS,� M14.,... ✓c"u ur°rENEE r e�i��:iil! I°YA114iF�b?.:".�?{v7�b'&'s�r"�%aySyL�7y�4� li•r�r���7►'J)I�`�I�14�V` f vcL�,� A.I i fiEc �w1 �n ►.. M OD �°�I°'As°os a 9?e �/1-1 J I.Li, F �. MeI+I,1.1 1:/il���rblllnll/.� lfdil. • 1,/.r..+/r.11.r,:...li.5 .:=il+Il p' ro,b. F. - 7,.p I'►II'ti. t U 1r.b' I IGt /%p,, • . >c. ,. ••... ���•q �-ii c wr-" �.• — z > z wovEr+rc mxwEa -�sy^�¢�: a] \aI ao�ro ,° n le/11 �w�. „i] Ix 11 Io ° '/,� 4�\.�z`T''1�.� M al _ ssv a �vPOa"iw Q m O w 6�►��r?u�i1W� \', \ •'�4" �t�l;+� M s e ,.° \] jr/ __ �x n N I- d C7 b a�; - l \ \ �4f. „ ` y� yfyry • ,. „- `WIPE N .°„° U > w / E4, yY��/ wNr i)iI F \`P� w z W CO ����a,� z. �/ — -- - 6— —� nE" I1 War �ISr ¢ U t tir _f. ¢ HAIL _ t!/.I-1E 512E Y•P_!•4�RY1 I ,, P40"GW / N_cRoss i /•• - F U • Jde{Z GICUN,TU JIVE Np.pE.E 0.g1; Hw I C EN 16 6 Y r._ \li.�� ��a+�'i.( i f. +t ( t,, NP[ I //\ a M .�v�'foh'fAPLe use,vR�il/ 4'PvT 18'SP.ul.r Q O 2 1� Inw"I t /& I v KINNIKINNIGK ¢ z I- i \lJlllllp .S IL co O IL ) A, >m s°ssc E d.[r9u wE� 1 "gttti�,411.Z �: , II W 7. a co AoE..IA 'El>KI.WED b-AIG4iEP-' 2144" cl f. l �( \ DS I EI wu �� •kOU a. : N z vji \cl 14'se�lu� W co r { ]° �. J 3c o s f Nv2 �vJtea�lAw b' Ili 61 e- *!as',d / •I 1{qII/ �x+ ]) �cn I/ y' =t 1- 1 r ..GPM 40,:016eK PNE 6 r I e{ ' I Iil .... A I s.u x ME v • m � > I / . = _ 517 5 PfRvh G4u-,at 'AWNfoaga 3 1 y¢ e re_�._''c`yBE �I .. /'\`��c-sror¢ -� -f E ,., 0 I "Si-...0 �� PwW2=¢INro Pes.tz r% lure 61,61<J(AKE r4rlvvY OI.IE`-�X,oN 444 _ 1 $ / -uNs I ./ T. .s J, ''t,,� (— .r-' it. ^�--. �. �- s W t I 1,11.%, •. OIL 1517 -.�"�- - 00 F710'I'IWA FV-OP Fzl/ zd'M. G-l'ZPA(-INCH I 5 ImD 1az PH0.5E IIB �. Q� S{\ N\ D rp ', �_ x B�r0 E-\cxxirt° V -„;. •.' t DINING Dh4°FA y it�= I c COrtI lI u I�_I n n `a' 4� y l • vvoP qr CDCN[N \\ / \ y.f E 11 I =��SGN: FENCE I, I °•LI- I I- I ; '\ .. v" a� /1 Il \ •,,...�.. :r ♦ Nr.II IYDG.F.NAM,PACE `J\\Y//V '11f J := -��az,o �_IM'A �y 4 �' • PN41iYrGilnrrr.r...+ ♦rf ft S.. \ U i �J- \. aver! ! ,_ I)�l+Nc t� ,t���l,I�r r J1• .1,Ltii 1i G �� 'J� _ ''p _ o,[[ w �,.� '-- i/itE✓, F�IrSj +1 o41, /a 0.,,..�� k.,t, :�,1,, \`.��!I °I EG • 1-W`�.�� •• f `auea uu tef�y�f • jc'Nm • VAULT -Do'i D" • \f c '' ' ; as Dart.+r Iaa POvni 4 p1 1717 mu N-° — :t�} , N I CO m g_-- .vDDu°LE rEEur.S,rtaE ,2—oue rta :c r i wS` us`i:irs 9O-- � ssMONRDEAVENiE NE - xn.v � p w,"•1 WgVu '4 ,5 �jQ a tI_ —�— ---- - -- .`wL �ha8rGx°3ENS H41.4141-/ xwK • // Grxrt or; ° laLtz . ,wn` �' � wx°Nm°al7`i cvcNrcE 4WD. ro.E Emsrtnm C .. xEN,.a.., / / o m CO / • Ern Si. .5.b.°,[., a x I]/,CC° I5•, .4.•I_+" _ E5649ss_ ,6EO-,25,C". _ l' r PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN ( 1 x,� Z \� IXISf.ARE HP'DRPM 8 2 1•=20' fL \.\ �` �\ I NER 16-23N-5E END i°IRc(IN N CREIE E Z Q N,Dx LDUIs°r, EN�a f1 , . z a NL ND4DIxL PK/wWsxER w, --- R ,� �� RP' Po NIDn --__--- — /MATCHES ED.RDx --= W \\ -- ------ Q OF EASEMENT a a; wPs =a SURVEYORS NOTE r.. WIRE rO —_ v\ slim �\ \ PO�ER _ z \� �\ exax e x4s� ro i —• —__� —_• r R _.b a ;I wRE ro-fis.r.• \fASENEM"µPOIM `Po'nER ME,ER, ppoLo ow. P ~ PROM 11(1 kEWEST JET .-� m... -- m8 8]HIII T` n. _0/ /OP 17E 280.00' - °-"_._JZ\ " —_ E 13 `p O CO PROM NORM .4 d1REWAt.. --- 1,_a II _ _ sE Ea for WI E Hi•GS 02. F (n W En FENCE.... Nr.On to - D R[�Rw-� .,.� Y rc `•wsamr�. U F- PROPERTY CO ENE E 9PW[pR wlRE - _ — w R ,n- n — E Hi•00...' 7 Z } Z § za i•...21 zo , ,e Fv WIRE r r. '3 „ ,o ,_ —_ _°PPaoP _ -- . FE W O • yp 8 6 �' !,i /. W r ,[x / -�� ' -- WIRE Nr.8Jw6• O Z w X `z iwsx crx.• 7 I' l I.. 1 1/Y WATER SERVICE V W / — S FROM�METER O BIDG.Pc _ WIRE VeIEO^ DD.• f.. W z. \\:, r'',/r,--/ it I• /1�xy,7 ET ir.NO i' j' of W I F VI CREASE i/ ,fC / '/ I R ONOER saos4 sM,1 ,'In(--. '\ l"" Z CO a INTERCEPTOR // I �J j \ �� I If o W CO °,I $ 1r-m / I R r� \�/I 38 _ O° u`•(D sxi/ _ (Ds: WATEF MHER LL 3I _ n \ $ (SR AN q ON '1 TOI / • PRONE T C FAQ .� 0 E CNRIpN ED) / ��\•GR �� a-mK , NiGx \� III m 6 R f �° �I ow_ f 3 s _ $ PRDP, el Sip C—STORE o. o / ti� • i et, O 31 I. �1 .n_ : leg°Rr E lei 1 oxxER¢ I = v 4'BLACK c.o / wINE Hr .e \ N ,1 "' 1 f A POSTStwvo-—ram yy oP PxoP coftxER I Jz I E PHASE 111D 1 dam • , r�l ^ 1�^ I�+ & fi S zO.wx H4xx•O -co E:rsH DINING GSXIERr. \` I( II I(011 . S�4..1,ATER PO END fl C°NC roster uo u"Exr • I. O L,wx u"K ( ® ® AIR/WATER kH AT CORNER &PROP�r.w+ER II I... m+cE I O� I I,' DISPENSER ux - \ 'x' `P�� A rW v ZYl�� �• J. <xuN 5WS YA%.TILE ` v -. EBeA Wn E \ .(f� II _ ForriC -111 L—oo • \\ 4 deP°wn coR°xER —,oP wc' W---� 4 m�31^RRi• rr i.n st.rNJ •• f-y, n b 0 o°K L.li�- —�. . li +Eo "E le., IXIST.SIDE SEWER _ � � �, /ssux-o— — —^ SIN=wXrtE STRIPE i 1,' OCA ON TO BE CONFlRMED ]vd mow _ rss•d Auer - yx t ^3'^^ti i _C1Fl smtlE wxrtc SiRTPE Po 16-" v'NAL xCX .. _II "CMX ss N \ ooD2rc WELLDw„RIPE — PotN{-CE_CCNNECRCr_—__—___—— - __ _ D. i{ I NOR. .aR apt ^ v.. rT n T' I`ST.-SVSTEId"'�'� ———. 2—iTa YELLDW---0 -- _—Al� M COPPERPL x YJrrF_____________ _____________________________o____ ______ _ __-______.__________-________________-___ ss4N- _ — L. cA"S ortvil1°.pSE T' SO.-4AIER IGAONROE- VENUE NE NRnAEiasaENs _ __ MNrxDE '.„'�PD L°`E gN..,Ri / —PAY TEL...sorv.,_D./ <oNr,_E-/fi g ITT xmNa R Y VALVE = V IXSf.FIRE HYDRANT g ,V• lo,� r[R l '�5Re .. 41 bea3iF w mm Oa i • 11- rR • i °zoccW y o WIRE NT.xv.: WRn',I i r: P<•'� m b 1 En CDI, POLE 1 EXPIRES ._v,1 : m PW..3680. wr.nm.03ne/ID4e II 44 scale r zN UNE s<r<"Was zs660-0.1s60-1ssw N. CO , z • 0 • NOS, ALL COLORS LtSTED ee.om ARE BMW F • CPI MATT•LMRERTC LMATR!,Cass Q B.BES NOTED DR66.SB > OMWaw.DSatDoo raOF.]at,PI/MOM 1 J T&N&CTCRLNF.Y ©.cua..LDB Auara.ao NV TOER=COLOR. 8 W weawLYPLMMT®FASCIA WON OP4 NAVARA asAFa Q TYPICAL ROOF CONSTR. W°W ©TO MATCH C.WOLw.DS RID(.S RECOR w+a•RW 1060AROl(QTDIMIe SEE DTL e/Ae L N MUMS'POV 1./YiNY R® -TNIATWI Alo 9RORTNFHD. r/xm PFMfWS (TA SWB PMIP OR ROHN F HMO P2OT E. PAMHa eALV. G'l[WyUNN `• SIMC WS p 1 ©rOH3R catch 12SO PEARL TOR W >♦d.FRRN.aae V°OOQ PM�V�T IAN • 1 ///'''P OVROR4STCPE EU .COO,2141 FROMM LIEHT e BR9 WI PMowmon.H.KIOSY /, `I� ROr�I%1C/© / I / 3• ©(JIWd P/BLIA CDIOR.RLdb)al£ W ((((!(u 11111111 , -7 a MEAL MISPRORXP a Y CC ALT.ODQ 02611ECEOH OR I./1 EQ .vP. 'm1 Q D,l-a/b !II'11li1li[C'/17)1Ciii1 111101t1 o w mP) g Z Y -•.._• •.•• ••::. - /� PNRI®IkTILi1.CiDS -PgTO MATCH ROOF�©� L / / >i- oj O� 9 // pi � / I. I. ' o , T,R,L �::I: G TLL/m.eiZzA n TRM'c° O W Y Z ^ U > W = ACFt FAsw PN8 PPS / , FRONT ELEVATION - CAHOPYLADHt D"A'"wN,�w"ii } '- 2 G u in rcAL MOOS ON Mak �� V4'.1'-O' ORTO STORMAGG w TrP.w] 1- RC PANS AT IEIemn AREA Ci S = FETAL STAMM SFNI POOP PANES - < 1- -I Tool Fbl•NOSIwLYLIBOMT®LEPER. J J Q W I (CGOH2 S82TFaLLLY II DIE PME., Q v 0 CCC Z F 1L8 RIERMLY IlU1IPN1tD OLYROI L000 N1ATgPsrn PANTED -FETAL m0 NTpY� rF 4ern-) Um PAOPEO SAM TA T�izv �` Q O -ProR SEM MOP 'DT�i�.'T is ewwacavN 1=rLfm1. 9 PANT TD rcR BMX.cacRw �W 1 LONIER �� EO �LBE.w Ea ..OL.1$ P�TAMATCN MLdIo + I/P•I T �J/AA,, A3v �.�a'ri�iln'-w FQ°�RMioiR g \ '.'�, ^ I �' ROLP QT. TO N.,CN ax ,-OI 6 P FOAL n)®D�D © // ll !V © Wv ir�l.�li�Ck oih:rl1ll►C' S� © o - o EE \ ? RR PACE COL. / f °R B�tp� L { 1•011 TM..FREAK sEe Harm wl BWBrt AO. AL \�� �m6 N O n ✓< "� 8 l •I ' ./11'. < E',1.2 ' ,) 0 .��I, i �� I.o f I l if m 3 NNTperMM ° mho A KASPHRY y AXIT Rw; MIYP) R�IDtPY1 BY R✓ffffitf£NNO N P WOr,1,NFS w .OgR ERAIT- g � PAMf®ETAL RJJflS NL491TTS2•CKWPRlR9 BY COOLER taRRALTCR TO HATCH ROOF P•TEo taORMIMTW CQGa .K PTibKIR TO CURB �04..O.,SdO (1 RIGHT ELEVATION U �,.,NO' Chevron OSR(Quick Service Restaurant) = SWC NE 4th Street and Monroe Avenue NE Renton,Washington babe R LD+',V. • Emerald City Construction and o of Lakha Investments 1 ro ECC*MC-2-96 1 N r, o Q q I _ I� 5E2EEFNF .L OR taOWlG ER1GR Ns ewe, Z 9@BEVAnoND OR iPAnEIX�tT UV.ERN®tam • Z IMMO 11TDD oEcaEx • I I afar $ @hams,.aanme<am 2aD ruwn.I WRIST 92.OG. pR�Oppppr�OR� FAN A.UNIT Cp.rooNMDS AOD81r 6V0 ND RR mJOIRAVNL4.DM.1 Q ff .i . 4 SLONPILNI HIO \ ©TO MATER IY.1XNIES RED Rf6•IDOKR W Z 1= �I�IIiN. PWROI•Mai 14V.9 rnTIDAL' n AFLNY`'® J O •: i.--------------TAY Asir I;I` ©TOY6t COOL 22D2 MARL MT w E- a U i. ' OF'a ©!RAM.PAN T OR aMP 1 NAA"T E.wlawl O W 'III pcJcwoll rA9cu rgDw mLalo)arE ¢ y ALUMPON W Q re IRA !( �AT® X Z WAFTS- KITCHEN b sTD' 'D"* Chevron OSR(Quick Service Restaurant) } o I SWC NE 4th Street and Monroe Avenue NE 'm D Renton,Washington z �' SECTION Emerald City Construction and I -. El '�PER Lakha Investments U 0.9•NO. CONCRETE - ECG*MC-2-96 1a SEE SITE PLAN RM T 3'x O A .... rw4.v0 FOR LOCATORSE./// \ / / \\\ , sue• aD — y• ' MIMED. O ITO HA ik� rowurN cDNc,ELK CC LLI I-- M O Y " _1. .!; ':its a .//%I�\\���'►�` 4,.. EaraP'''' z W z — • > S NC ,........................................................iiIiIT EBB U W ---- _ ���• rite �fl[I[!i![III[IEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEIEII ® SOH CURDS Z W CO ® , — •7 m O O' } - fLQ v 1 • Y = `- o o .1 II �' rill ��I _. . w '< X OA d I §II al O � I .fir /ANT .. 'rod + „WWmTA ro MANN NNE,IW MELON COND DG,NO ' 1- 000.MOCK GLUM.A. SEE RECO LI- PAIRED NIL RASP. OPTION.E%IHNRt DOOR ET GOOIER CONTRACTOR ODOR TO RATON CO.BLOCK MOOR BOARD NNIFALIDCED DT 4 (Th REAR ELEVATION METAL MORID Er C00.13RTDNm. NOROA BASICS rou'/anoa°)' ORDER cam NDH,iNONOR.OR • 11 V4••BO. ROE NRI OMR T ODOR IEsa® 1 P Jai OlwvR 0 0 n ( + °I °I 'I 'I PARED ERR.MT.PARRS MTN IEf D•xWMINItMAMR .yp @ yp I PANTO ENLV. METAL PAWED SIBS.IAOTx3J (L INTCII CO..ELK /—V a/i\ %. NO D/NI �% A / TA WADWENO I rn. 1Rx«r O E..-I E--: O �rvr ADTO I POp SIaI n m \ \ LI -- MATCH PANED DbEw.,. ff.L � * 1 ' _•. .:...>,. ....• :. v'.i�:...-M:[....:::.-�c:;�..�':v5+''fir• a ♦ _ ... _ ,. .. p,; #.(A. / / a -__np.. 1I BST. m oe ��� `/SAD Y§ :1( 0.• • ~, Told+ Q� u DIG GIINA I LIVE MONO. ALIONH OMB.1 IRMO E L •f• • SEE CT-PBC* D'O UDE --II NET • T@F8ID OO♦GROJR ro HATCH D�UAJ 0+.. c WOO AWN S. Bf MNNJ ROOF.BOBO 000ter rr V AErE 11R1IEOL1l 'gir FACE rrerwlNrx to uTCNrN re CO CT-ROOD ro ORE ml'�IATcx eRTs�i b91co.�` (1 LEFT SIDE ELEVATION ' caxc.aDrx nrPA SEE �J W•Ib' 0 OTI i m CO i10 03 QI x Canopy/Spanner Signs I 1 Chevron ,Chevron l ••Single faced McDonald's sign opposite Hallmark on white fascia •Chevron and McDonald's signs must be of comparable size ,tea.A I •No McDonald's signage on blue fascia j •No McDonald's signage on spanners .25X[ AA. Dewar 1 Chevron por.. ilk separate pole sign is used, no co-brand signs or identity allowed '"'`�'rJ _ r'^r.TM'._ on Chevron pale r. Now signs or 1...U,ppil m .0.001% panic monuments. 0.004 "LuE __0.00A °IL" -_ a 0.004 >u :z.0.008 i Street Side '(Street Side :oil - M El 0.00A f'i'�' iStreet Side 0.00A Preferred High Rise Acceptable High Rise Preferred Pole Acceptable Pole Requires Monument Region Approval High Rise Signs Column Mount Signs Monument Signs •Either side-by-side or McDonald's mounted below Chevron ID sign •Chevron and McDonald's ID signs side-by-side •Chevron ID,LPS and McDonald's ID •Chevron and McDonald's signs must be of comparable size •Chevron and McDonald's signs must be of comparable size signs allowed •No APC,price signs or readerboards on high rise columns •McDonalds readerboards of comparable size to Chevron LPS •Chevron and McDonald's signs must •No separate high rise pole signs •No APC signs are permitted be of comparable size •No McDonald's readerboards on monuments •No APC signs are permitted Chevron/McDonald's Co-Branding October 27, 1995 In the 12 western states covered by the McDonald's alliance, no exterior QSR signage is permitted other than McDonald's. In the non-alliance states,exterior QSR signage is permitted for McDonald's and Category 1 and 2 QSR's FEATHER EXCESS Planting Notes and Materials Rms.2/96 Ao. SOIL UNDER MULCH PRUNE DAMAGED TWIGS AFTER PLANTING WOE 1-1/2-INCH 1/2-q0N 08OCT .DET,BY 6-FOOT COMAS FIR(2%2%61 PANT UST FOR 1 MULCH AT CR PUCE PIVERT.POSITION:DOUBLE LEADERS WILL BE REJECTED ELINT SPACING 1/Y ABOVE GRADE THENALL MATERIALS.LABOR,EQUIP..AND mom IMAS NECESSARY TO ACCOLLPUSX ORwB61 1L 1"ABOVE GRADE m TREAT..ARID PREPARATION OF SOC4 RN.GRADING.PIACEUEM OF SPECTRE°PLANT NOTE: LATERALS,FL RDUZER,STAKING,MULCH,CLEW w WIDE-UP,DEBRIS REMOVAL AND 90-DAY 1-tl1 PoL 'E CHIN LOG TRIE TES:OR 3/Er omosR RUBBER. 7 MULCH(COMPACTED) 0 STAKING ON"AS NEEDED BASIS-PER NOTES;ALL GUYS TO BE FLEXIBLE 9YIDITDLWE OM COCOITNTTAW AU.- 0 KEEP ROOTBALL MOIST AND PROTECTED AT A TIMES ONALFICATIOIli PRESSLWE TREATED M11/RR l0 SIX-TENTHS OF ONE POUND(0.6 LB.)RCRIGN0(UA-22). 0 HOLD CROWN KF AND LIMBS FT OR JUST ABODE FINISHED GRADE 'I\^ USWE CONHOUt FOR SHALL BE PERFO M 1 0 WORD GEARIE I THE FlEID°1 wONK B SPEGFlEO SIZE MAIM 2f/{REPAR PFA OETM. o PROTECT TRUNK AND LIMBS FROM INJURY LU 0 BACNRLL TO BE SETREII USING WATER ONLY- ci NO M LLIMr9 1!COMPACTION AWJIIR6OCILTDDN.S EIJCENSFDM PEnFORu ME WORK SPECIFIED YMIx MEPRESIDINGG �L SOTDDD CO LLNOT LOVVE SOO 0An ODEHO RIM.SOD SfWl INCLUDE BWEGPA55 FOR 9NDER PFRJi 00°.CO• • .'• .•• `.PLR ARED _ //' O • (2)2N2NSTAKES.PLUMB(11/Y01A%IO'SCHbGALV. ��//, Z'US ME COORACFORS RESP alit/TO RENEWMESITE ARID RE--zT BFD PIPEAT STREETS)WITHE FIGU E1 EIGHT) KTY9E �ee' DSCREPINGES TO ME UBIDO oR ME OwnER'S NIB ONSET. 6 MATERIAL AnD lAM1®RO REMOVE.SF1080NTAINER h SCORE 77 REMOVE RUBBER GUYS TIED IN FIGURE EIGHT) - SHED GPMES ARE SUOJECr TO MPPOVAL AR THE OwnER. ROOiflALL.SPREAD OUT GARGLING ROOTS' . �`1'� EMOVE ALTER ONE CROWING SEASON SING BUCK PoLYETI01DOW ED AIM AS FIORD 6D BY V 600]3EWF NS9 OA ERODDE Rp>F�p1 UNDER LAME NAPE OF"DANDY OIAUGp PIgnE NUMBER( ) - BACTERIA 10 BE SETTLED USING WATER ONLY PROTECTIVE WRAPPING DURING SHIPMENT TO SITE h INSTALLATION BIERIICUARDER I lip n CAVE Ax0 PROTECT ALL EXISTING PLANTINGS SHOWN TO REuax. CO NOT PLANT UNTIL OTHER 'S NOTED Ox RIw REMOVE AT COMPLETION OF PLANTING , CONSTRUCTION OPERATTO.WHIM CONNCT HAVE BEEN COLLETED. AN IRRIGATION 1� IFipiTWNI W M IS ID BE INSTALLED. DO NOT PLANT UNTIL ME SYSTEM TESTED AND (RANTED AP ITIMLCH) (3 PLANTED BEFORE TURF PLANTING:PRONDE 3'K-NO CRASS.TREE RING A S DEEP of AREA BEEN HERBICIDE IS NOT RROMUENDED FOR THE FRSF YEAR NTER INSTALLATION. MULCH W WELL MULCH:1/Y-1 SIZE APPROrtO. TILE PUNK HALM CAPE-W not DAMAGE OR BREAK ROOT SYSTEM,BARN, MOLD BACK FROM TRUNK Er TO IT OR BRANCHES REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE ITEMS GUIDED AS A RESULT OF WORK,OR WORK NOT I COMPLIANCE WITH PLANS AND SPECIFIunoss.AS DIRECTED BY OWNER AT NO ANDf�YJM ........••.,....• ADDITIONAL COST. Groundcover Planting Detail FINISHED GRADE 8 • -PROOF: LW TO SHIPMENT TO SITE FROM JUNE THROUGH SEPTEMBER. � � O TED OOU NJNITIII6 THLl TP-It ROOT WATER PP4NT5 PRWR TD OEUVRp. WART MATERIAL DEL""IO SITE G SOLE NONE SOEPARE OR D BED OFA SPEC'B:AT MIN..LOOSEN AND MIX ". a DGUROC qE COURSE OF WORK.REPAIR ALL IXISTHC PUNDNO AREAS BT PRUNING OEIDL BE KEPI CONMGLLY YDISI MROUGN Ix51AGA1roN SOIL i0 18'OR DEPTH OF ROOTBALL M10{DUES BALL qA STARuSHwc iwSHro CRAZE AND RE-uULCN1uG TO SPEGFIEO LEFT �E wL BACK BURLAP:REMOVE LIES.COMYNERN flE BASKETS; SCORE ROOTBYL B. GUARANTEE FINISHED GRADES _ GALGW.NT E NL PUM,:r..FM A PEx100 OF WE-YEAR FRCu GTE OF WY FINE WDETM D 00005 ROO.AND SINEW OBJECTS OVER Two INCHES(S)WUETFA TOP OF CURB SET BALL ON UNDISTURBED N SE OR COMPACTED MOUND UNDER BALL 8 CEPLeNCE OF THE JOB BI OWNER (E)OF PREPARED PLANTING BED. ODES SHALL BE i0 TOF OF MULCH SLOOTI EVEN RADE'S.ESLIGHTLY COMPACTED,AS SHOWN ON THE PUNANDD OETULED SITE PENETRATION TO SUBBASE(W)1Y (MOAT YAMBwW'P DRAWINGS IDENTIFYFINAL ELEVATIONS CURB Y CONTRACTOR SNAJL PROVIDE OWNER WITH A SCOPE OF WORK AT TIME OF INITIAL PROJECT BID TM333 BARK MULCH T ID OE DSGPE AND WMATON MAINTENANCE FOR PO DAYS F1R0CCG COMPIETON Y WI UY �ll PROVIDE (ACCEPTANCE]OE FACILITY BY OWNER GE IRKS ON SITE IN PROPOSED LOCATIONS PER OR AN.. EXCAVATE PIT,PUNT AND COMPACTED DEPTH Deciduous Tree Detail Mun PROJECT AS DEscFnBED PUNTING AND Gran VAI`TUNFENWCE AR E OR GUY,AS CALLED OR AND DEMUR TREES AND SUPPOTS TO STAND a VERTICAL TREES SHALL BE P CEED AS SHOWN 5� EB[PLANTING PUN. sLOCATEDi .DEET• (B and B,Leas Than 3'Die.) CALLED Yam.DNO ILEIN LHelIGL COUPAC80N Ru USING B SS • MANF DMulch at Curb B SCALE NONE PUNT DTTEWALN SHALL BE RAKDE NO ACCORDANCE WITH(RAN)moos WATERILATERALD �OSHRUBS AS SPEGTED FOR TREES. O Z (ANSI 260.-1906). E SOLE NONE 0 (jJ NURSERY ONLY U UPPOON AUTHGIIUTION E UNDSGPE ARCHITEt CATS' 6 RECD. INDICATES O%SACCQ91 t ED:"LONT: DIGFcs coNMI„D"a BESa TES DO r"G• Y SATISFY GLIDER aTDR6 ABOVE SOIL LANE;'CAL' L GaLOu. GRJw BAG TEAUL EXCAVATE PIMA ro A MWIUUN OF MPLE INCHES(OS)BELO CE ME ROOT eeLL I �PROPTRANSITIONR O g .5 2 BR"B6B CONMNEfl CONDITIONS. F�E�4TOL�THOROUGHLY AND RAKE FARE T RE•TIUL R001 GOWN LS AT I1/ (Y OEM PLANT CANOPY ORB GAPER D II.WRAY n�T.^e E AS OETULN. TAP JOINTS = W Z SIZE ESFABuSARS MINIMUM PLANT cpnOmOR To BE FRONDED I 21 2M•2 D.F STN(ES;LIE AT APPRO%.I 1/3 LO 1//2 HBGHF yy O O( FE MAIM RELLIBLE RUBBER TIE R FlGURE ACM 0 > Y1�1 GS NOT COVERED EZ THRF. ERN.STAKES AND TREE PLUMB 1 ®�axER OR BALL wSTDAWTIONDDEUGRDCUDNWODCOVFA WHILN IS RL•UFR DUN OHED`GWAN COMUNPE`RIESRERIOR i0 I � O � � PRESSURE TR M1N0 S DEEP SAUCER FOR WATER 11 PLANT MATERUL wVSHAALLLLUMYNTH STATE AND EFDERK LAWS FOR DISEASE URM«FNMNCEo TIMBER 6R6• O �[ LOn FATLY NNE. BE vIWE0U5.NETT roflLLEO.HALM • lF•---REPAIR ;MIN.DEPTH OF MULCH(BARK) guns SHALL BE SOLI o TaLl NSfO GR ROONDCADCTNEx FEHOu ir,eff PRA.NaW"°,11x OF TREES/SHRUBS ARD 2-FOOT MULCH yyy J F60 W Q DESICCATION. YLLOxrarvED P�iIN PDapTECTEO mau Ix,IURY ANO 5 0 UTNIv VAULTS - ANTMp 6 REMOVE BURLAP FROM LOP I/J OF ROOTHLLL Qcc ESC VwD51FPE ARCHITECT OR BANNON°TFMF�I IMNIDMT� MPLETED ' III— LAWN E%GYAIE TREE Pli AT A MIN.OF 3 TIMES r ^ O U RANTS DETERMINED Erf HAVE �, DL4 OF ROOIBALL SCORE ROOTBALL AND PI WALL ^ n g LEADERS DUMMI0OR ANSI ARY,OF CROTTtlT6 LESS THANDS SWLL BE ROOTS. SWAM, TREES.DOR DO NOTEET SIZE AWTpH,µD UNTIL ACCEPTWN ANCE OF LANDSCAPEDMSTUTAMIN_Po N -- PR SPOILS BaCKFlLL .LJ.1 J1 N MA ERR HA RpM A SINORLEALxDa R SDGRLE FpR EACH SPEGRED M.CE E« E . „.NEEDING.ADS CULTIVATING.TIGHTE°PUNTING rG SETTLED =1 _ _ III o PUNiES/ E CHOSE LOOTED NORM OF THE N2ND KENO*DTI WI GNU URNS WEEKLY AFTER TURF ES INSLISNLETONN Ix 15 -III-TILL 1- SET BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE. OR COMPACTED SOIL. • 1(I000�I E(CwFORLI OFTC N BORDER) F OUO PLANLS AND PUMP SHOZO LOSS DA{0 PERCENT ORSMORE OF - I���-I • - GP Z O CI UO�m1ITP1 URCEME iH{OUGH 11MBEFD"O.C. W m THE IRRIG TRTLOBUSYST`M SHALL E MAFMEUD INCLUDING AOJUS„LENTS FOR BALANCEDNER R MATERIAL NSF OR varR WILL BE PEAUIREO x uALPuxCITT,IRRIGTION EOURYEM °N E S YIE UTIONS ED ro ME OWRER FRAM,WO E IN WRITING POINT R T NRNARCF ALL PLANT Timber Header Si Mom THAGTEOWEREA ICAPE A wNLH. THIERP'EECIFIED"":ZEDSPECIESITµD MMATUELS OSF oPEGO"mRCTOR NECESSARY OM.THIS WORK CROWN AND TO s ED c`PLANT O Evergreen Tree Planting(6'To 10'High) 1Y NEAREST vARIETY,.MPRO END.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. WORRONTI/GUA4aAFES R 1 P MALE NONE A SOLE NONE • BOIRREPARATION nFIC LO ME S�EO.OR i0 CMRTRax RDOxS OF ME SIZE,AS NOTED Ox ME E SP` BACKFILL ARE GEnla REOGREUEMS HOLD PLAMS FROM 22 I 1 FOR AIL IANESCAREDARFIS.UNLESS NOTED OTHEDNWISE Ox Mf PUN. EDC OF PLANTER O • 4 0 A' _ AS NOTED ON PUNT 115T MENDED PLANTING SOIL PER NOTES(TOPSOIL) TURF Y AS A WNW.SUPPLY TOPSOIL CONSISTING OF MLA s0a RIM 6 TO t SPACING AS CALLED OUT I • MULCH y AORRGANIC MATTER. E MENDED WITH SPECIFIC MENDWENISEIN CH. P ON LAN/LANT UST Y MULCH(SETTLED).S LOOSE 'h1 ITECT CORRESPONAND LLT D To OW MD BLENDEIL D OF DETERMINING SOILNSERVATION DEPTHED TETELTURUMOLASSSSESSCAPE FOR `DMA FINISHED GRADE .�/ FlNLSNEO GRADE ,4g yp ANY„ECEESSARY WEED AND CONTROL SAMPLE OF �u CONiTAAMINAATDERD IS RESPONSIBLE / LAWN II-�^1 I�. ��(-•��+°a• 8 & u € s' BED LINE EDGE HOLD PLANTS FROM �• 1 O TO NAME RUMPf COL CURB ALN /EOGM OF PON EN J EETµ%NPAL EUSSIFlGTIOx. PROVIDE AUEnDUExTS /W AS OTED ON PLAINT MST Ji •6 j —Ir., III ��IINI I_ Iry C)L. ) .. LOW AND ROrOTILL AELA NSF%SPECIFIED DEPTH LIT RI-15 =11= I_ III—III-�-ITT-T 1 9•METAL STAKES AT 5'OC CIYBOBR NOTE T J11H (NLL PENETW.iION) THIS SPACING MPUES TO TOPSOIL CHRUB ROW AND ENTYAL EDGING PER PLAN -III I 1 GaYJC OaAKBT SHRUB ROW PLACEMENT. FINISHED GRADE:GRASS 1/SH1" PROVDE THREE-INCHES.MO-wcHEs cpMP,,02 I TA DF COMPOST PER O Spacing Detail FROM TOP ROFA BEAD. MULCH11 6 INCNEASROF SPECIFIED TOPSOIL DEPTH. SxR00u COMPOST.SLUDGE/COMPOST l Y FROM TOP OF BEAD YVTAPER TO S AR BLEND D/DR AGED FIR BARK MULE SLMLL SATISFY ORGNIc Hatt MENIS Punting Bed Adjacent to Lawn 8 MANTALULL BE ETON NON-FARM AN AL SOURCES.NOR FRGY SOURCES SIAN.REDWOOD/CEnw PRODUCTS. SOLE NONE D SOME:MORE O Vinyl Edging Detail = 1 11 a FDTILMT swE.NDnE m COMPLETE FERTILIZER YTH DUCE ELEMENTS. PERCENT Su1FUR,AND A Mlrvluvu FINISH00 00AOE AT{1 T 1 OMPALIED DEPTH OF a m b m OF 50 PERCENT SLOW RELEASE NITROGEN. FERTNZEft BE"AGO-OELLNE SLOPE(( ).2N CH;S LOOSE I ERY - - 50 POUNDS PER 1 E FEET OR YARDS OF SLOPE(TP M .) 11 ORGWC COUPOST:ORNALY-MILER-PRO ORNAMENTAL- - -2 AT 0 POUNDS CURB PER COIL TOPSOIL AS SPECIFIED ui ORGANICw1 33 SDD T�TO DW„OSYPER 2 0WDSDrUJIE EEET Ells g T DS Of`P DMWINCS(MAIL( TOPSOIL T E CO n 3 r .u • -POD SIMILAP) SLOSHED GRADE AT(MIN) (COMPACTED CONDITION) N''e e a HIGH SLOPE(MA%),10:1(MIN) (MENDED SUBSOIL.COARSE � ,� & DI MNLTOBM:MR, PREPARED SUBGRAOE COARSE TRANSITION FROM TOPSOIL (SCARIFlED)TSFE IS m TH� �a _Mq% ( TO AMENDED SUBBASE i0 SUBSOIL FROM LOPSOIL / I • ON-SITE TOPSOIL(EXCAVATED PD SPOILS)AS FIELD PREPARED FOR PtumnG/TORF. MP%. 1 gEFEW Y ) REMOVE GRAVEL -/ {\J M_ DW OTOWIi LWBARAIAN COMP 0 ULCH S DPNN AT LOw T a{ AND G POLARIS a 0'MAN.SPACING `ZJ y�tJ I P OF PREPARED TOPS PER AA)ANI/OR B),ABOVE • �;• BERM SEIGHT TES CONCRETE CURB:TYPE PER I�i TY A DSCAPE NM. S E EVEN, / / / AS NO ED ON PUN CML DRAWINGS _ TYPICAL OUT THE CH PROi1LE. 0 SUS- q �n V / r•O NSUBSO TPE D"rs- OEPM s'AETLEo a SHFLM m rc7RITEDGED oEPM. / •• / it 1� S {Fr.. uF ;-f : ITI FT ISLANDS SMALL BE OVER IXGVAFEO BY BA[KNOE IO A uINIWu G _ MNIL LANES I„ - - 11�1B INCHES BELOW LOP OF SUBGRAOE • CN.RUSH • . J� ''� BADA 1Al01 • SDEWAG IN TURF b "- V c. ONE-HALF-LARCH(1/S)SGE,TD ONE-WG(1") E."ME ri BRAN. MPLY �� (CURB SIMILAR) SUBCRPDE y�\ �; �,-.. V C�` IV a / PAVING SECTION P UITG TED IN TODFO FINE OWOETHREE I . tS)TO LOUR INCHES((T)RR CIVIL DRAWINGS - „pTMM E 1......txuRf AND COW R�o.'" B E O Planter Section i 0 0 H O Grading in Parking Lot Planters(Topsoil Prep.) -moo. SOLE:NONE C NONE a Y2I File: 5660LD Date/Time: 03/15/1996 13:48 Scale: 1=1 Scott Wood Xrefs: • d 41 4 ,_, d m I d ' e'4• I"\. I 1 1 5 ib '- / C p / L_-I . A., ,, .,,,,, . „ 1 /4, ri_\11A z f,\ /Q5,44•l e gg g,An i \ t \ + L 'S 5 a lk 1 ,tt \ S - DM'S In 4 AIM t �.L},• �I�a4'-4VY 4... 5b II a RIM Wil I u-0 R _. 1 �G IP • d a L----, , ,-- 1, d1i , • ii il. a PIP la 4'1 gN -5/ — — ' — • 5. . \ a 4 IC',/4 I /52,M IM� irg4= I-V4 51 \14 3• MEI d 4 • m 1 .—:. I gi i /////'':/// c,$/jz \ . --4 4- Area i o I. d al @. • 93/4•;1 a 1 6-,K2' nisi /7. / I - 'KO' 6 \�— i110 g 1i % s P .I /�_I rti ....id I a I II — —_ Qg s bv 4• I, ,V, �rm �mn r �27' d li i • 7 (�O o b _ O , -�E 7 Zp a d 1,, a I �n UQl ' �► m 7 d i 0 4'-I 3/4',ip � Y I11 0 S i 1 5 _ O fD , ��, a b. ri\ a sa , / <co 4' (O. L I( m Z`" 5 °•$ e•o•,51. 1'-0• nr�sP IB-0'M. ,I-0• ' "'-,VY "'4 V4. I74 1/2' I I I py b.' I q 1 4'I 11'-3 V1' D'-0 In• 14 !g 1 O O O ..I-1NIm.149,I PGHAt, 18215 72N0 AVENUE SCUM °"".b �` For Me: 5880 to KENT.WA 98032, Gam_DM ,,�,,,,, EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION Z (zos)zst-szzz ,,,,,,_ ,/,•.,•- and LAKHA INVESTMENTS PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN ... : (206)251-8782 FAX ~ .= vm 11919 NORTH CREEK PKWY SUITE 101 8 , 10 ‘,''"ae.90E," tz °' B° N/ BOTHELL, WASHINGTON 98011 • • I • • z • 0 r �H, a # 11.1 ' w 77 IV t �J- PP POT LOCATE San Se J salt z � „ J - AlW 2 a HALLMARK 21 CANOPY-85'ELEVATION -\ Z III O -y-w•Iw 0 F CO h ° N CDO ,I 7 W 3Z O r1 F 5Ya ..u' ' ramw'w Tem PPM.c,...le n.«,o) Z NATED 0 W a z, v PLACARD MOUNTED I f' W1e Ofo> 0 > I F=a F=a F=7 ui CO Y ? Q a p in I_ a O i — B ; Lem ° ° ) ° ° � � Y = 3 I MF Kxo w Lea �usin I UFFER roRTION OF COLUMN O J I- W E6] C7] C=] i ➢ mce-�ao Par AL DN2K GRAY(6Y-210) ' (1 FREFIDS)!®OR'4✓111TE < o LOPEP USE INTERNALLY ILWMINAT®EP-i i--,.. W 0 z 0 arltw WNITE Bl4B351(BY OTHERS) g ---a 0 ° 0 ° ° M I ® ■. IEl�1R(BLn30�PANEL. w m POS SIGN FRAME. Y. W — - — C-tJ7 _ C ] C-F7 DMKGRAY(6Y-210) l ISLAM,VALET WITH simile 111&1 I e a I I 1 I I FRONT MOSiHIELD •• COLIMN MUP En-ontevs) _hQ 1'I n n u I n SERVI I. YHNE(VN-035) I._ DARK FiRAY(6Y-210) 1 1 i? = I I 4 T I T re'" 'T') �� II I! I! POS 616N(NON ILLUMINATED) •U U �t i INCLwEs.IXnrro vA1Erp. I IIIIII (BY SIENOTHE(N) I I I t 1 i I . 11 i I ItI I. • IIII,1 III ;NM• I MITE M1lFB35) ii �,( it .I 1. 1- s rrra• a I b e�cwrr a I e'v H I R1 of a-e PP BASE.DARK GRAY(6Y-2a) 1 ri y wns REFLECTIVE D'IAS.STRIPES I 1 I I R�EN:E LINE(SEE NOTE 9) Y 5 8 DCL_2 LL a YY REFLECTED CEILING PLAN 3bl-0" ELEVATION W.W.I,. Sr AI,V,=1.-0. . erg,, gg1 REFERENCE DRAWINGS: SCOPE OF WORK NOTE#3 NOTE#4 <3 c7 3 Te VSAT ANTE4P4A IS ON ROOF °3 I N emb'n uwT muR oerAm OP REMOTE MARKETER GENERAL NOTES: ar i ..,d SOCP[SMUTS MVPIT IS[MTG.PO ITS ISPOS SNP A P.PP te m gSti Chevron QSR(Quick Service Restaurant) OS.SIMS M� IwaM P � SWC NE 4th Street and Monroe Avenue NE f.�.-,'"'a, PISPIPS COlaill H��>o • Renton,Washington a _ j -I Emerald City Construction and �b w 0I Lakha Investments °e•cR• • ECG*MC-2-96 0l 4 o m m ; (o al SM. ) a? • t z ti b n4 - / . I III J__. r, ILI .._,,...! c— Ell cv 1s i lei a• ILI .®iy> /17 Ej •tp EJt1 6 Lu i .1—kJ..IA9.I 6Hq`� 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH �pi°� a For. TILL 5880ir. KENT,WA 98032 ore.,, EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION (206)251-8222osad— ,',.,•- and LAKHA INVESTMENTS PRELIMINARY ROOF PLAN ,„., (206)251-8782 FAX +a^•a— ""°' 11919 NORTH CREEK PKWY SUITE 101 10 10 ~�'‘"*.F•a°`.0 `�`ING.WO FIRMA °" 4° �� BOTHELL, WASHINGTON 98011 • , ( INANCE NO. 4593 SECTION IV. Sections 4-31-10 .4 .D.1, 4-31-10 .4 .D.4, 4-31- 10 .4 .D. 6 and 4-31-10 .4 .E.3 of Chapter 31, Zoning Code, of Title IV (Building Regulations) , of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended to read as follows: 4-31-10 .4 .D.1: Setbacks : Setbacks in the CA zone shall be required as follows : a. Front/Street Setback: A minimum setback of ten feet (10 ' ) is required. The minimum setback may be reduced down to zero feet (0 ' ) through the site plan review process provided that blank walls are not located within the reduced setback. b. Rear and Side/Interior Setbacks: None shall be required except as listed in Special Requirements provisions below in Section 2 .c. c. Special Requirements : If a CA lot abuts or is adjacent to a lot Zoned R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10, R-24 or RM-I, then there shall be a fifteen foot (15 ' ) setback subject to the landscaping provisions in Section 6 . c . (1) or 6 . c . (2) . 4-31-10 .4 .D.4 : Parking: Parking of vehicles related to the commercial uses shall not be allowed on residential streets . See Chapter 14 of Title IV of the Renton City Code. 4-31-10 .4 .D. 6 : Landscaping/Improvements : a . Street Frontage: Lots abutting public streets shall have a minimum landscaping strip of ten feet (10 ' ) , except where reduced through the site plan review process . b. Pedestrian Connection: A pedestrian connection shall be provided from a public entrance to the street unless the i010000 ORDINANCE NO. 4593 Reviewing Official determines that the requirement would unduly endanger the pedestrian. c . Special Requirements : (1) If the CA lot is adjacent to a lot zoned R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10, R-24 or RM-I, then there shall be a minimum fifteen foot (15 ' ) sight obscuring landscaped strip The Hearing Examiner may modify the sight obscuring provision in order to provide reasonable access to the property. If the street is designated arterial in the Transportation Element of the City Comprehensive Plan, non-sight obscuring landscaping shall be provided unless otherwise determined by the Hearing Examiner. These provisions may be modified by the Hearing Examiner where the applicant can show that the same or better results will occur because of creative design solutions, unique aspects or use, etc . that cannot be fully anticipated at this time. (2) If the CA lot abuts a lot zoned R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10, R-24 or RM-I, then there shall be a fifteen foot (15 ' ) sight obscuring landscaped strip. A ten foot (10 ' ) sight obscuring landscaping strip may be allowed through the Site Plan process provided that a solid six foot (6 ' ) high barrier wall is provided within the landscaped strip and a maintenance agreement or easement for the landscape strip is secured. A solid barrier wall shall not be located closer than five feet (5 ' ) to an abutting lot zoned R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10, R-24 or RM-I . These provisions may be modified by the Hearing Examiner where the applicant can show that the same or better results will occur because of creative design solutions, unique aspects or use, etc . that cannot be fully anticipated at this time . 11 DINANCE NO. 4593 (3) If the CA lot abuts or is adjacent to a lot zoned R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10, R-24 or RM-I, then all outdoor storage, loading, repair, maintenance or work areas shall be screened by a fence or landscaping or some combination thereof as determined by the Reviewing Official . Loading docks shall not be located adjacent to or abutting a lot zoned R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10 R-24 or RM-I . These provisions may be modified by the Hearing Examiner where the applicant can show that the same or better results will occur because of creative design solutions, unique aspects or use, etc. that cannot be fully anticipated at this time. (4) Garbage, refuse or dumpster areas shall not be located within fifty feet (50 ' ) of a lot zoned R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10, R-24 or RM-I except by approval of the Hearing Examiner. In no case shall the garbage, refuse or dumpster area be located within 1 the required setback. 4-31-10.4 .E.3 : Effect on Adjacent Properties : Buildings in i excess of fifty feet (50 ' ) in height. shall not. result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. When a 1 building in excess of fifty feet (50 ' ) in. height is proposed adjacent to or abuts a lot. zoned. R-1, -. R-5, R-8, R-10, R-24 or RM-I, then setbacks shall be equivalent to the requirements of the adjacent residential zone if the setback standards exceed the requirements of the CA Zone . Syr"= CIT'S. )F RENTON ..LL Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman July 8, 1996 Mr. Bruce Creager Barghausen Engineers 18215 72nd Avenue S Kent, WA 98032 Re: CHEVRON/MCDONALD'S ON 4TH FILE No. LUA-096-037,SA Dear Mr. Creager: The Examiner's Report and Decision on the above referenced matter, which was issued on May 30, 1996,was not appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered fmal by this office,and the file on your application is being transmitted to the City Clerk as of this date. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, • Fred J. Kaufman Hearing'Examiner FJK/mm cc: Jennifer Toth Henning Sandi Seeger,Development Services . 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593.. ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer - y_ -°� CITY CIF .RENTON sn Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman June 20, 1996 Mr. A. J. Ladner Executive Director Housing Authority City of Renton P.O. Box 2316 Renton, WA 98056-0316 Re: Chevron/McDonald's on 4th File No. LUA-96-037,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Ladner: This office has reviewed your letter and has treated it as a request for reconsideration.. The issued raised, other than the litter control, are really general traffic concerns and not in the nature of matters generally imposed as part of City review. If pedestrian safety is an issue or ' • becomes one,this should be brought to the attention of Public Works which may be able to alter the timings or establish mid-block cross-walks in the,vicinityof the subject site. The-Authority •can also help in educating its residents about proper street crossings in the vicinity of the new use. • The litter control should be covered by other City regulations, although one would hope that • • most"fast food" restaurants have become better community members m helping to educate their patrons in proper disposal... If this office can be of further assistance please feel free to write.' • Sincerely, Fred J:Ka an Hearing Examiner° - cc:•: Parties of Record • • Mayor:Jesse Tanner, Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. ' • Members,Renton Planning Commission, Jim Hanson,`Development�Services Director ' Art Larson,Fire Marshal _; - 1 Mike.Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J.Warren,:City Attorney James Chandler,Building Official ' • Transportation Systems Division Jay.Covington,Mayor's Executive Assistant Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Valley Daily News • 200-Mill Avenue South-Renton,Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593 . • . I • GM PARTIES OF RECORD ! Jennifer Toth Hennin_ Bruce Creager Neil Watts 200 Mill Avenue S 18215 72nd Avenue S 200 Mill Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 Kent,WA 98032 Renton,WA 98055 Randy Welch Doris Alexander 19119 N Creek Parkway,#101 15744 SE Renton-Isaquah Rd. Bothell, WA 98011 1 Renton,WA 98059 1 l pp• it . • _ II i A Housi: , Authority of the City of R4 ,-,bn ( 2 0 6 ) 2 2 6-18 5 0 P.O. Box 2316 • Renton, Washington 98056-0316 FAX 2 71-8 319 TDD 255-8373 OPPORTUPITY C� 1OdC� ^ J1�1131996 J June 11, 1996 Mi 4-WMENRM 04 ,11 . ASIMMMER Mr. Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Ave S Renton WA 98055 Reference: Chevron/McDonald on 4th - Project # LUA-96-037, SA, ECF. Dear Mr. Kaufman: The Board of Commissioners of the Housing Authority, City of Renton, has requested that I submit to your office, their concerns, on the above development. The Housing Authority, City of Renton, owns and operates, Cedar Park Apartments (244 Units) , at 408 Monroe Ave N.E. , in Renton Washington, 98056. Our concerns for additional considerations, are as follows: The ability of residents to cross on Monroe Street, and also, mid-block crossing; Adequate litter control, (paper) ; Reconfiguring street lighting control, so that it is pedestrian activated. Curbing and sidewalks should be handicap accessible. In the event I can be of further assistance, please contact me At 226-0495. Sincerely, C4 1111"-WX1--" LAj A. J. L ner, Executive Director Housing Authority City of Renton AJL/bf Housi, .,;, Authority of the City of R`:...'on ( z o 6 ) 2 2 6-18 5 0 A P.O. Box 2316 • Renton, Washington 98056-0316 FAX 2 71-8 319 101 TDD 255-8373 CPPORRWIT ,CEIVE 11 JUN 131996 June 11, 1996 ,okrir Mr. Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Ave S Renton WA 98055 Reference: Chevron/McDonald on 4th - Project # LUA-96-037, SA, ECF. Dear Mr. Kaufman: The Board of Commissioners of the Housing Authority, City of Renton, has requested that I submit to your office, their concerns, on the above development. The Housing Authority, City of Renton, owns and operates, Cedar Park Apartments (244 Units) , at 408 Monroe Ave N.E. , in Renton Washington, 98056. Our concerns for additional considerations, are as follows: The ability of residents to cross on Monroe Street, and also, mid-block crossing; Adequate litter control, (paper) ; Reconfiguring street lighting control, so that it is pedestrian activated. Curbing and sidewalks should be handicap accessible. . In the event I can be of further assistance, please contact me at 226 495. Sincerely, A. J. L ner, Executive Director Housing Authority City of Renton AJL/bf AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. County of King ) MARILYN MOSES , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 30th day of May ,1996, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: ` C(-+ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 30/k day of `7 , 1996. CAj Notary Public • d fo the State of Washington, - residing at �T‘-c_ ,therein. Application, Petition, or Case No.: Chevron/McDonald's on 4th LUA-96-037,SA The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT • May 30, 1996 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: Bruce Creager(Barghausen Engineers) Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th File No.: LUA-096-037,SA LOCATION: 3209 NE 4th SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Requests Site Plan Approval to demolish existing building and construct gas station with convenience store and quick-serve restaurant. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on May 7, 1996. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the May 14, 1996 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,May 14, 1996,at 10:23 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity map application, proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site plan/landscape plan Exhibit Nos. 4 and 5: Site elevations Exhibit No. 6: Ordinance 4593 The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by JENNIFER TOTH HENNING, Project Manager, Development Services, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South,Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant requests site plan approval for the redevelopment of a 1.3 acre site to a Chevron service station, and a Bruce Creager(Barghausen Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th File No.: LUA-096-037,SA May 30, 1996 Page 2 convenience store and McDonald's restaurant within one building. This particular site is south of Renton Technical College, east of Greenwood Cemetery, and north of a vacant parcel which is currently used as a gravel mining operation but which is zoned R-10 and has been designated for eventual development of residential properties. Properties to the west are commercial in nature. Currently there is a 7,000 square foot building on site, Alexander's Auction Storage,which is going to be demolished. There are also electrical transmission lines which cross the property. The applicant has fine-tuned their site plan to accommodate the guy wires that need to come down and has incorporated those into the landscaping so that the buildings do not interfere with the transmission line facilities. There are existing water mains and sanitary sewer located in NE 4th and Monroe, and existing storm facilities located in both streets. This particular site is located within Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection Area(APA). Applicant is not prohibited from locating in this zone, provided they meet the City standards for lining of biofiltration swales and have double containment for their tanks. This particular project would have three underground fuel storage tanks and would total approximately 35,000 to 40,000 gallons of fuel capacity. The applicant has indicated in their submittals that they would have double wall containment for those tanks. They would have alarm systems monitoring all different types of detection systems and the capability to have manual and automatic shutoffs if there were any leaks detected at all. The convenience store/restaurant would be 4,300 square feet in size. The store would be from 17 to 22 feet in height. It would be displayed with the graphics that are associated with the McDonald's restaurant, and also a Chevron mini-mart and service station. There would be a pump island canopy that would be set back about 55 feet from 4th Street and 53 feet from Monroe Street. It allows for anyone who would be approaching the site to come in and fuel their vehicle and leave either via NE 4th or Monroe Street without getting back and interfering with people who would be coming exclusively to be using the convenience store and the fast food restaurant. There would be three driveways for this particular project; a two-way ingress-egress driveway would be located nearly the mid-point of the frontage along NE 4th, but actually closer to the west. It would allow for two-way movement, both in and out. There would be a second two-way in and out driveway located near the mid-point of the Monroe Avenue frontage, and this would allow for anyone driving a vehicle to access the site for either the convenience store,the fast food or the service station. There is a second egress only driveway at the southeast corner of the property that allows for exiting from the drive-through lane that would be part of the restaurant. There is an escape lane if somebody is not in that drive-through lane. It also accommodates the aisle width needed for parking that is associated with that portion of the site. There is queuing for six vehicle spaces around the building and stacking for a couple more spaces before they begin to interfere with any kind of movements out in the canopy. It doesn't appear that there would be conflict with parking spaces because of the aisle width and the angle. The Examiner asked if the noise from the drive-through speakers and microphones would impact on the future residential development of the site to the south. Ms. Henning explained that applicant has indicated that there are volume controls and speaker orientations that can be accomplished, and there are ways of providing fencing and landscaping if needed to help buffer some of that noise. The other element is that the drive-through lanes typically only operate 6:00 a.m.to 10:00 p.m., so they would be operating 16 hours. They would not be operating from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m., at least under the current proposal. There may be the need to put some sort of a condition stating that even though the service station is operating 24 hours a day,the fast food might need to be limited to the hours they have stated. Bruce Creager(Barghausen Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th File No.: LUA-096-037,SA May 30, 1996 Page 3 The project did go through environmental review and there were three mitigation measures attached to the project: that the applicant pay the appropriate fire mitigation fee;that the applicant pay the applicable traffic mitigation fee at a rate of$75 per each new average daily trip that's attributable to the project; and that the. applicant limit construction traffic on adjacent arterials during any of their preloading activities to the hours between 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. This proposal includes landscaping around the perimeter of the site where the majority of the parking would be located. There is a combination of environmental shrubs and sod proposed on the perimeter. The sod that is being proposed also serves as a biofiltration swale along the western edge of the property. However, in order to effectively provide buffering and screening between this project and the adjacent uses to the west which are the Renton Collision Center and other commercial uses on NE 4th, staff is requesting that applicant be required to provide additional screening on the western property line, either in the form of a fence or trees or shrubs,to increase separation between the uses and buffering along the western edge of the property. The Examiner asked if the potential residential site to the south had adequate landscape buffering or fencing. He also noted that the trash dumpster appeared to be located closer to the residential rather than the commercial site,which would be less bothered by that activity. Ms. Henning responded that there may be an alternate location for the trash enclosure. At this particular spot it does not conflict with the location of handicap access stalls or the maneuvering of fuel trucks, but perhaps it could be located along the western property line, closer to Monroe. Also the landscaping along the southern property line is sufficient for the eastern portion of the south property line, but it is narrow in the area of parking spaces 24 through 27 and the trash enclosure, so it is a narrower area. Perhaps there could be some supplementation in the form of a fence in addition to the ornamental plants that are proposed. The Comprehensive Plan states that any increased demand for commercial uses should be accommodated through redevelopment and intensification of sites within this particular land use designation rather than the expansion of those areas. By redeveloping this site,the project does meet that. Currently there are storm drain problems along Monroe, and some of that has to do with City maintenance of facilities. There have been overflow problems on the site from Monroe. The proposal has indicated that driveways along Monroe would have a slight berm so that if any storm water problems occur, it would keep them from coming on site. This was a recommendation also of the storm water report that was submitted as part of the application. This proposal includes facilities to collect storm water and convey them either through underground retention and infiltration facilities, or discharged to the sanitary sewer system. They also have a lined bioswale as required in the APA Zone 2, and that is going to be provided along the western and northern edges of the property. This proposal is within the Commercial Arterial(CA)Zone. Building height in this zone is limited to 50 feet, and this proposal would result in structures that are no higher than 22 feet in height. There is lot coverage permitted of 65 percent in the zone. This proposal would result in 16.7 percent lot coverage. Parking required in the zone is a minimum of 40 and a maximum of 42 spaces total. Applicant is proposing 40 parking spaces. In terms of impact to surrounding properties and uses,there is a cemetery to the east, a car repair to the west, technical college to the north, and gravel mining/potential residential site to the south. There are other commercial developments and residential neighborhoods nearby. Applicant is providing for landscape screening from adjacent uses to the south and west. Staff is asking that additional plant materials be incorporated into the site design for increased screening on the west, and suggests the extension of ornamental Bruce Creager(Barghausen Eno—_-ffs) Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th File No.: LUA-096-037,SA May 30, 1996 Page 4 shrubs on the perimeter of the western property lines such that these shrubs don't interfere with the function of the bioswale. The site has been designed to provide a clear separation between pedestrians and vehicles. There would be raised walkways that lead from the sidewalk on Monroe Avenue to the convenience store/McDonald's to avoid the necessity for pedestrians to cross through the service station fueling area and parking lots. It is anticipated there will be many pedestrians coming from the technical college. There is a portion of the raised walkway and access doors on the east and south facades of the building. They are located near the drive-through lane. Staff is recommending there be a metal railing added along the south walkway to prevent pedestrians from wandering into that traffic lane that exits the site. It is recommended that there be some sort of traffic control warning or stop sign for drivers who are exiting the site. The architecture that is being proposed, and the installation and maintenance of landscaping should prevent any deterioration or blight to the area. Staff anticipates an improved aesthetic over the current site development. Staff would recommend that the approval be granted for this particular proposal subject to the following conditions: (1)that applicant comply with the ERC's mitigation measures; (2) that applicant revise their site plan, specifically the landscape plan,to provide for additional ornamental shrubs along the western property line that do not interfere with the bioswale, and that those shrubs be approved by Development Services Division prior to issuance of a building permit; (3)that applicant revise their site plan to provide warning or stop signs at exit drives; (4)and that applicant install a metal railing along the south side of the raised south facade walkway so that pedestrians are separated from that drive-through exit lane. BRUCE CREAGER, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, 18215 72nd Avenue S, Kent, Washington 98032, applicant herein, stated that the hours of operation mentioned in the staff report were not fixed, and there was a possibility that the drive-through may be open later on Fridays and Saturdays. With respect to the issue of noise associated with ordering menu items,the menu board and speaker is positioned on the west side of the building which is approximately 110 feet from the south property line. There are speaker volume controls on the menu board, and there are ways to reduce the volume should that be excessive. Applicant is also willing to install a fence along the south property line, as well extend the landscape plantings along the west property line adjacent to the biofiltration swale. Applicant also agrees to extend the handrail along the south elevation of the building to provide satisfactory separation between the drive aisle and that walkway for pedestrian protection. NEIL WATTS, Plan Review Supervisor,Development Services Division, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055, addressed the drainage concerns in this area, and stated that the City has done a lot in recent years to change maintenance of systems upstream. At this time when flooding occurs, a standby crew is at this location with pump facilities to pump around this location if necessary. There are current negotiations with the owner of the property to the south to create an overflow system so that instead of the overflow occurring and flooding in Monroe, it would go down into the gravel pit. There will be a traffic mitigation fee for this project of approximately$43,000.00. That is based on information provided by applicant's traffic consultant and confirmed by the City's plan reviewer. It does give credit for bypass and diverted trips and also gives credit for the existing use on the site. Ms. Henning presented a copy of Ordinance 4593 which contains amendments to the CA zone that list special requirements for landscaping for CA lots when they are abutting lots zoned for residential purposes including Bruce Creager(Barghausen Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th File No.: LUA-096-037,SA May 30, 1996 Page 5 • R-10 designations. The provisions could have a slight impact on the landscaping configuration behind parking spaces 24 through 27 and also the trash enclosure. Mr. Creager stated applicant was willing to install a 6 foot high solid barrier wall along the south property line, and if at all possible to keep that wall on the property line, not offset by 5 feet. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:08 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS &DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Barghausen Engineers for Chevron/McDonald's, filed a request for approval of a Site Plan to redevelop a site with a gasoline station, convenience store and restaurant. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. 6. The subject site is located at 3209 NE 4th Street. The site is on the southwest of 4th and Monroe Avenue NE. Alexander's Auction,which is to be removed, currently occupies the site. 7. The subject site is zoned CA(Commercial Arterial). It received this designation with the adoption of the new Zoning Code in June 1993. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of employment generating commercial uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 9. The subject site is located in Zone 2 of the City's Aquifer Protection Area. This does not bar development of the proposed uses, but does require certain precautions and construction techniques. 10. The area in which the subject site is located contains a mix of zoning districts. The frontage along NE 4th is generally classified CA like the subject site or Center Suburban east of the site. There is also the R-10 residential district immediately south of the site and R-8 on the cemetery. This residential zoning requires that the subject site undergo review at a public hearing. Bruce Creager(Barghausen Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th File No.: LUA-096-037,SA May 30, 1996 Page 6 11. Greenwood Cemetery is located east of the site, east of Monroe. Renton Technical College is located north of the site. Commercial uses are located west of the site. While a gravel quarry is located south of the site, as noted it is intended for residential purposes under the Comprehensive Plan. 12. The subject site is approximately 1.3 acres. The site is level. There have been storm events that have flooded the site but staff believes those are resolved. 13. The proposed building will be approximately 4,350 square feet. The building's dimensions will be 38 feet by 83 feet. This will include the restaurant and convenience store. There will be an approximately 3,150 square foot canopy over the gasoline pumps. The canopy would be approximately 17 feet high. 14. The maximum building height will be 22 feet. The exterior treatment will be painted concrete block and glass window wall. The roof will have peaked elements extending above the facade's parapet wall. 15. The canopy will maintain a setback of 55 feet from 4th and 53 feet from Monroe. The building will be 165 feet from 4th and 15 feet from Monroe. The setback from the south property line would be approximately 60 feet from the menu board. 16. The gasoline use will include three(3)underground fuel storage tanks ranging in size from 35,000 to. 40,000 gallons. The tanks and fuel and piping will all be installed with double containment systems. The system would have internal monitoring to detect leaks and an alarm and automatic shutdown system to limit leaks. 17. The restaurant will seat approximately 52 to 60 patrons. There will be a drive-through window located on the south facade. Orders will be placed at the southwest corner of the building. 18. The restaurant is proposed to be open between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. The gasoline station and convenience store would operate 24 hours a day. 19. There would be parking for 40 vehicles. The stalls would be along the west and south property lines and along the north facade. 20. The drive-through lane will wrap around the west and south side of the proposed building. An escape lane will be provided to expedite traffic flow through and around the site. 21. Staff has recommended additional landscaping along the west margin of the site. The applicant agreed to include additional landscaping in this location as well as along the south perimeter of the site. The applicant also agreed to install a fence along the south property line. 22. Staff recommended that pedestrian safety would be enhanced if stop signs were included at all egress points and if a handrail were erected to divide pedestrian foot traffic near the drive-through facility. 23. The proposed dumpster would be located adjacent to the residential zone. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: Bruce Creager(Barghausen Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th File No.: LUA-096-037,SA May 30, 1996 Page 7 a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 2. The proposed uses are compatible with a wide range of policies and goals found in the Comprehensive Plan. It creates employment opportunities and provides a range of goods and services in the Highlands area of the City. 3. The proposed uses are also compatible with the Zoning Code. The proposed building and canopy meet the setbacks, height and lot coverage criteria of the code. Building code review will occur with the submission of a building permit application. 4. As noted above,there will be a drive-through window with order entry menu board on the west side and pickup window on the south side. Generally, amplified systems are employed in drive-through windows and this could have an impact on the quality of life for future residents of any residential complex south of the site. This could definitely have an impact if the window is open during the proposed 6:00 a.m.to 10:00 p.m. operating hours. The position of these components could adversely affect eventual residential development south of the site. The distance of approximately 60 feet from the south property line coupled with landscaping and fencing should offset the impacts somewhat, but the noise could prove unacceptable. It is true that any development of the south property is speculative at this time, but the only reason for this public hearing was the fact that the proposed site plan is adjacent to residentially zoned property which suggests that protection of even potential residential uses was a consideration. One does not need violations of Noise Ordinances to make a residential living situation less than enjoyable. Lesser sounds, particularly early or late in the day, can make a residential unit undesirable. Discouraging undesirable interfaces or living situations is one of the essential elements of both Zoning and Comprehensive Planning. Therefore,the applicant will have to execute covenants that allow the City to require the silencing of any public address ordering system if complaints occur that create undesirable impacts on the adjacent residential properties. 5. In other aspects, the proposed plan appears reasonable, although as suggested by staff, supplemental landscaping along the west and additional landscaping and fencing along the south property line should be installed to better screen the site. The dumpster location should be moved to somewhere nearer the northwest corner of the site, away from the residential zone. 6. The development of the site should not adversely affect current property values in the area, although the increased traffic will have some impacts on the community. Bruce Creager(Barghausen En__: ;rs) Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th File No.: LUA-096-037,SA May 30, 1996 Page 8 7. The pedestrian and vehicular circulation appear reasonable, although staff has suggested that applicant install some additional safeguards at the driveways and a handrail to separate pedestrians and the drive- through aisle. 8. The one-story nature of the complex, including building and canopy, demonstrates that adequate light and air should be able to reach the site and surrounding sites. 9. The site can be served by the City's utility infrastructure. 10. In conclusion, a lot of emphasis has been placed on assuring that the proposed development remains compatible with any eventual development south of the subject site. Clearly,the location of very active uses--a 24-hour service station and convenience store and a fast food restaurant with a drive-through window situated opposite a residential lot--brings with it many issues. It would appear that the proposed use is acceptable, if not perfect. DECISION: The Proposed Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. The applicant shall place stop signs at all egress points and a handrail shall be erected to divide pedestrian foot traffic near the drive-through facility. 3. The applicant shall install supplemental landscaping along the west and additional landscaping and fencing along the south property line. 4. The applicant shall execute covenants that allow the City to require the silencing of any public address ordering system if complaints occur that create undesirable impacts on the adjacent residential properties. 5. The dumpster shall be moved to somewhere near the northwest corner of the site. ORDERED THIS 30th day of May, 1996. FRED J. KAIUMAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 30th day of May, 1996 to the parties of record: Jennifer Toth Henning Bruce Creager Neil Watts 200 Mill Avenue S 18215 72nd Avenue S 200 Mill Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 Kent, WA 98032 Renton, WA 98055 Bruce Creager(Barghausen Ena____irs) Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th File No.: LUA-096-037,SA May 30, 1996 Page 9 Randy Welch Doris Alexander 19119 N Creek Parkway,#101 15744 SE Renton-Issaquah Rd. Bothell,WA 98011 Renton, WA 98059 TRANSMITTED THIS 30th day of May, 1996 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Administrator Members, Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Art Larson,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann, Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney James Chandler,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Mayor's Executive Assistant Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Valley Daily News Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., June 13, 1996. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities. or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. Appeal of the Examiner's decision is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 11, which requires that such appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King County within twenty (20) days from the date of the decision. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. FIG. 1 _ . ., PROPOSED SITE PLAN I • NE 4th Street I 1 ]o'-4f C16:1 • ttsd' I / I . P/L■196.00' I I _ 1 / I t _` u 14 / I I 1405.F. WAX. FACE I 2 15'NCH 1 I . I I 1 4 - IA >s-� 3Pd ' ' 10 r ——— `(I I ; @ I. @ I I II °11Po GNCPY i .--" • 1 •© ® , D AIR/WATER DISPENSER 7 g M' PMICRC�► j I L] — ——--— I�e ® • V I -o I PAT 1E1EPHOHES L 8 O�r 0 ® 1� L 1a1 1 r=ix: I 9 J.., I +� saH: �I I . 14 S.F.MAX.FACE15 Mat i I 12 I 0 MIEJ 11 13 I ( I A W I y N `ly iL fj 61 s 1° I U O 3S 36 37 38 ,\� 39 C N ` f `—,- d I 411 i mo 81 I Is-0' , m-a 2 ig e—Si0"c / 1.> o,,,,,,� it I t7 / �� I y.. 18, w1cHEN OIL 1511 ;('v�J }yj/ tenon :‘4 PHASE 118 tr \y4) 717-0 \ ttf/ —1E-4;Wh'il; '.'. - _.....- --- ) I X"— zt . .. 1 /.` � I , / zz • F `� / zS '►l SSSSSS. I/ i / 24 25 z6 27 try- -• P --16'X 16 %L■196�0 / . __ ,RASH ENCLOSURE / TITLE: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN: CHEVRON W/C—STORE & QSR - FOR: EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION 19119 NORTH CREEK PARKWAY SUITE 101 / :::....:.: ! \ b.1 : 7 ll' ��. i 1:'1 _ ! +yam+-1, -` , ,'`\,?..`. 4. :S 1 i. �--I`':•II,•;;c4• '.11.'_i: .\r_ r`/'._ tip.;,,°... s:. - 1 i •l _i r• ::,,.,.1•-.'''"':``r;°i'l• \' i}t;P. -'tit• `�I 1 • \-= , •!4-•• '.e`.1.1::','' `+'mot at �"��jr-1 Y-r e;: •a:\. l� n1 � • t ?k / •: : ••3•r, . . or- , :v� -t •\ m � 1 .4. • r' =., �1{..p .4..ii: :,,hal I \sz, \\ ff..::. 1.,,41,f.p.-. li- . g jI tic cv �•`� _..� __ I' O 2,--) - j.--r-,.- -,-;.. ---,,,. _ ....,„•:_- .. . . ., ..._ .4 , .,-,...... .s:,1:......t .— _ . --1 • › (z, ,• 174 • • 1 —• g •". t1'•%4..,•....,0in ram'1,3_I,..`‘t••."ik:".,v..._.-i..-,-,i-.,s..•:e:'•j,.•5... ,\ - • - —•-• 1 i ,i,\\ \\ •>1 • \ '4� .''..:�•,`.✓J rj, .7\ \0 II : F {1; • • ... e- - � �, at. , ."(:I F - Y . n I -- — -. -_. \I _ • i\ 1 e 1_" ,4 -0 • e k F ,E. ,,ss:? EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION CHEVRON WITH OSR �� to- Z (:G)?'.I-L??? w �' NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP (.-�_.1-e'a:r.. AND LAKHA INVESTMENTS " _� -•••-• 19119 NORTH CREEK PKWY SUITE 101 SWC NE 4th AND MONROE ST.NE .. i".<4............. ;I*'*,..+:-`,. BOTHELL.WA 98011 RENTON.WA • ba I i iP l i I .. _1_L [ `, r t. - •:-.: Itt• - t) -.-- 43 f N YI Il\ i (. 4 „A \ t fEll c` ,--') . FT P s ii ,dIv\ !Pi t .1 ,:- „ li�� ! •. � a. -.1-1 q.I ° $ 0 i pil ( 111 _ iii _ 1 , g o —° Itliliii m ,...,-,A,,, , 1 , '''Is-' ii dZ I ic i �r o a4 "� 1 "n. i. I 1 3 i - $ 'I �..�- �a-_ ,�. IR\ z . Of — �'y O va \\ ii a: lg • ll * IP _11T 7_f _ ai PI In mod• ... i, 2 i O o g ° Y 1" ‘1001 J ,,„ . . 3, „,,, . iii p? a" .„ , ...,..,_, ...• . e e As l'? et y__:.z. y illi Pi 1 lif an- .... 6si s t; . ,..• .. ,{1},1 � �' rvg e p".• -.....N 1) P �3 11 E. d 91111.1 a my iii1 F ; I 1 V 411iill i di I • t• i 2/ ! 1 i i 1 3 ill i I._I,I—I_I rr... PGHAL, )t1213 72tm AVENUE S0t1i11 0*JO- For. Title: 6880 mr 1FNf,to uao22 jc EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION (20°)n' °2� W. and LAKHA INVESTMENTS PRELIMINARY EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS y i Y (200251-47e2 DX �"`�� `r oino)m,).alno,,,w„a *^- = �• 11919 NORTH CREEK PKWY SUITE 101 7. 10 •4^r...+•••• QDA°'� �"`a ""'�" BOTHELL, WASHINGTON 98011 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Jessica Folkerts , being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL The Environmental Review Committee DETERMINATION (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- VALLEY DAILY NEWS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Significance - Mitigated for the following RENTON, WASHINGTON j project under the authority of the Renton 600 S. Washington Kent, WA. 98032 1Municipal Code. a daily newspaper published six (6) times week. Said newspaper is a legal CHEVRON/MCDONALDS ON FOURTH newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six The applicant The applicant requests Environmental months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the Review (ECF) for re-development of the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Wash- subject property with a Chevron Gas Station s i ton. The ValleyDailyNews has been approved as a legal newspaper order andiconveniencervee store with a newMcD under- of ld'- 9 PP 9by quick-serve restaurant. Three new under- of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. ground fuel storage tanks would also be The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Valley Daily News installed. The proposal also requires Site not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Plan Review(SA)and is ntsu propertyot to a publicth (andPP g Y hearing since the adjacent to the during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a South is zoned and designated for residen- tial use. Location: 3209 NE 4th St. The 15 day comment/14 day appeal peri- Nn t i r'a of Env De t ods for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 p.m. on May 07, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environ- on 4-2�-9Fi mental Review Committee are available at was published the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton,Washing- The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of ton 98055.Phone:235-2550.You should be prepared to make specific factual objec-. tions. $ 96 - 15 A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Wash-. eg I\ erkJ\Valiey Day News ington, on May 14, 1996 at 9:00 AM to j consider the Site Approval(SA). If the Envi- \J C/ ronmental Determination is appealed, the Subscribed and sworn before me this 304" -da of 19 T `P appeal will be heard as part of this public y ` hearing. Published in the Valley Daily News April 22, 1996. 1475 N c�1�FE`—Z - ,`00, ��:'sS‘UN P�,o�•:�� o Notary Public or the State of Was ington Q;0� 1 A p �F ttil residing at Avtrrnr� if :ch• i �0__ j `� * King County, Washington t • * OPUBL\C�(o;`44 9,�FofI,r\\-\�°,cy l► r ;; CITA. _3F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 16, 1996 Mr. Bruce Creager Emerald City Construction Go Barghausen Engineers 18215- 72nd Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 SUBJECT: Chevron/McDonald's on Fourth Project No. LUA-96-037,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Creager: This letter is to inform you that the comment and/or appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. The Hearing Examiner's decision on the Site Approval (SA)will be mailed to you approximately May 28, 1996. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 277-6186. For the Environmental Review Committee, gewAiD 11/111.F-� - Oh Henning -roject Manager cc: Mr. & Mrs. Lester Alexander/Owners FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Thi,, nnr rnntainc Ffl%rwrvrlwri malwrinl 7S/nncr r.,nc mnr CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the ('6- day of , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containi +Ve l.VWVie\ Etit ntwur TrcPpA' documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing -TIVUX.e. Crca.cir Ev ?&e .kcl �1 (hv skvtkcilati. C C . 1e er A1.ekaa 4e rr- AN .‘7. Icoe d,vr #bumf' /Kz*tl vt - ( , of lawknA (Signature of Sender) ' .Mckb0. S STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) /� I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 6�L)RA K S CCC-E/asigned this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. �• /� /�, VM y Dated: �/ 6/"/6Q lt-trA4, (Gei.(c2 . �.. t`'- ,y, ,`.. Notary P y c in and o the State of WasiiingtcnV V t1 n y o -yt Notary (hint) /�I fe/q-/c��J• /ce 1- ,.r. My appointment expires: (,/ 9/N2 '' A c •'.. Project Name: Chekiyi V\ I ptc.D0v\ekdS 6v\ 4. Project Number: 9(0 —031 1 S}st ,e-(,`_ NOTARY DOC � • _»MAT , ' VA. O.11 . ::: E.RS`>SEC.O:ND F OO.R; RE 1:TO:N MUNI:CI:P ► B:'U:I:LDII G>'<< >< » >`< :i::ii::i"y i::';:?>;�{{:::::::��:ii::•;ii'.::i:i:::::ti::':::::J:i''C;'j:':''::j;:}:}j!{?i::i::::i::i::iii:�' i2':.:��ry::::::::i::::i':i':is::i::::::.i:::'r':i;%??'4Q:::;;i::ii;'fr'::j;i::i:::i::::i+'::i:;i:�:j?}� , :: t ec s r, ::the:<crcter::att::> ct►'>. ,::T�iee : .Ii�f►Ala.s :t�ste�::a#'$:a#t:.�r��r..:�t`.;�.:. iq�ft�.rt�i�.�ber�Q.ni ;and::rt�.::�..::.:�..:sa.... :::..::...::.......:...........:.:..:.�......:: • ::th.� >viral(::�e:::head:,.:.:.;lt�l�tstnr.:ll.:b.�:�a1..::�:�q.::.:.:...:....... ...................................................................... ........................................................ PROJECT NAME: CHEVRON/MCDONALD'S ON FOURTH PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-037,SA,ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests Site Plan Approval for the re-development of a site located at NE 4th Street and Monroe Avenue NE. The site is presently occupied by Alexander's Auction Storage. Existing buildings would be demolished to accommodate the new development. The project would consist of a Chevron gas station with a 38-foot by 83-foot convenience store that includes a McDonald's quick-serve restaurant. The McDonald's would feature seating for 52 to 60 persons and drive-through window service. The Chevron station and convenience store would operate 24 hours each day,while the McDonald's would be open from 6:00 am to 10:00 pm. Location: 3209 NE 4th Street. PROJECT NAME: R&D FACILITY/SW 16TH CENTER PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-034,SA,SM,ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests Site Plan Approval (SA) for the development of a . -- new one-story structure (Building A) and an addition to an existing structure (Building B) on a partially developed 22-acre site. Building A would be 129,000 sq. ft. in size, while Building B would result in the addition of 202,000 square feet to an existing 85,000 sq. ft. building. A total of 618 parking spaces would serve the site. These would be speculative buildings, with office, and high-tech manufacturing uses anticipated. Three wetlands are present on the site. Two small wetlands are not regulated and would be filled. A third wetland (approximately 16,000 square feet) is subject to the requirements of the City's Wetlands Management Ordinance. The site is located adjacent to Springbrook Creek, although no development is proposed within 25 feet of the mean high water mark. The project requires Environmental Review, Site Plan Approval, and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. 801 SW 16th Street. • • HEXAGNDA.DOC v " City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner CHEVRON/MCDONALD'S ON NE 4TH STREET LUA-96-037, SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 14, 1996 Page 1 of 9 City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date May 14, 1996 Project Name Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th Applicant Bruce Creager(Barghausen Engineers) File Number LUA-096-037,SA,ECF Project Manager Jennifer Toth Henning Project Description The applicant requests Site Plan Approval for the redevelopment of a site located at NE 4th Street and Monroe Avenue NE. The site is presently occupied by Alexander's Auction Storage. Existing buildings would be demolished to accommodate the new development. The project would consist of a Chevron gas station with a 38-foot by 83-foot convenience store that includes a McDonald's quick-serve restaurant. The McDonald's would feature seating for 52 to 60 persons and drive-through window service. The Chevron station and convenience store would operate 24 hours each day, while the McDonald's would be open from 6:00 am to 10:00 pm. One driveway on each of NE 4th Street and Monroe Avenue NE would provide full turning movements. A second driveway would provide egress only from the site onto Monroe Avenue NE. Three new underground fuel storage tanks with from 35,000 to 40,000 gallons of storage capacity would be installed on the site. The tanks and product piping would be constructed with double containment. The underground fuel storage system would have interstitial monitoring for the detection of leaks. Alarms would be activated if any leakage occurred, and immediate shut-down would occur. The subject parcel is located within Zone 2 of the City's Aquifer Protection Area. Since adjacent properties to the south are designated for residential land use, the project is subject to a public hearing for Site Plan Review. Project Location 3209 NE 4th Street (at Monroe) B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record C. Lester Alexander and Doris J. Alexander 2. Zoning Designation Arterial Commercial Zone (CA) 3. Comprehensive Plan Employment Area Commercial (EAC) Land Use Designation HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner CHEVRON/MCDONALD'S ON NE 4TH STREET LUA-96-037, SA, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 14, 1996 Page 2 of 9 4. Existing Site Use Alexander's Auction and Storage 5. Neighborhood Characteristics North Renton Technical College, single family residential neighborhoods, electrical transmission line corridor East Greenwood Cemetery, commercial, multi-family dwellings South gravel mining, electrical transmission line corridor West commercial (Renton Collision Center) 6. Access NE 4th Street and Monroe Avenue NE 7. Site Area 1.3 acres 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area 7,000 square To be demolished feet (approx) New Building Area 4,350 sq ft C-Store/ Restaurant 3,150 sq ft canopy Total Building Area 7,504 sq ft (canopy and store/ restaruant) C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation N/A 2249 6/20/66 Comprehensive Plan N/A 4498 2/20/95 Zoning N/A 4404 6/7/93 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities Water An existing 16-inch water main is located in NE 4th Street and in Monroe Avenue NE. Sewer An existing 12-inch sanitary sewer line is located in NE 4th St and also Monroe Avenue NE Surface Water/Storm Water Storm facilities are located in NE 4th Street and Monroe Ave NE 2. Fire Protection Provided as per City Code HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner CHEVRON/MCDONALD'S ON NE 4TH STREET LUA-96-037, SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 14, 1996 Page 3 of 9 3. Transit Metro Transit serves the area on NE 4th Street (SE 128th Street) via Routes 147 and 111. Routes 106 and 107 provide service on NE 3rd/NE 4th Street and Monroe Avenue NE. 4. Schools Renton Technical College is adjacent to the site. Highlands Elementary, McKnight Middle School and Hazen High School are within one mile of the site. 5. Recreation Windsor Hills Park, Kiwanis Park and Highlands Neighborhood Center are within three-quarters mile of the site. 6. Other Site is within Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Arterial Commercial Zone, Section 4-31-10.4 2. Parking and Loading, Section 4-14 3. Site Plan Review, Section 4-31-33 4. Aquifer Protection, Section 8-8 F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Employment Area-Commercial, Land Use Element 2. Community Design, Land Use Element 3. Environmental Element G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND Site Plan Approval for the redevelopment of a commercial property in the Renton Highlands. The applicant is proposing to replace the existing Alexander's Auction and Storage with a Chevron retail gasoline station and convenience store with a quick-serve restaurant. New buildings would include a 49-foot by 85-foot (4,350 square foot) convenience store building that includes a McDonald's restaurant. The convenience store/restaurant would be from 17 to 22 feet in height. The McDonalds would have seating to accommodate from 52 to 60 patrons. A drive- through lane would allow for ordering and pick-up from the McDonald's and would be located on the west and south sides of the combined convenience store/restaurant building. The gasoline fueling area would include a 38-foot by 83-foot pump island canopy with six multi-product dispensers. The height of the pump island would be approximately 17 feet. Three new underground fuel storage tanks with from 35,000 to 40,000 gallons of capacity would also be installed. The pump island canopy would be setback 55 feet from NE 4th Street and 53 feet from Monroe Avenue NE. The convenience store/restaurant would be located 165 feet from Be 4th Street and 15 feet from Monroe Avenue NE. Recent changes in the development standards portion of the HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner CHEVRON/MCDONALD'S ON NE 4TH STREET LUA-96-037, SA, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 14, 1996 Page 4 of 9 CA Zone have eliminated maximum setbacks for structures. The applicant's submittal discuss requests for variances from setback requirements of the CA Zone, however, the setbacks have changed, and no setback variances are needed for the proposal. Site development would also consist of new landscaping, paving for parking and maneuvering, lighting, and signs. The project would require approximately 2,000 cubic yards of cut and fill earthwork activity. This would raise site elevations for finished building pads, and excavation would provide for new underground fuel storage tanks. A total of 40 parking spaces would be provided, including two handicapped accessible spaces located near the north facade building entrance. One 35-foot wide full-turning movement driveway would be constructed on NE 4th Street, 125 feet west of the intersection with Monroe Avenue NE. A 35-foot wide full-turning movement driveway would be constructed 125 feet south of the intersection of NE 4th and Monroe, and an "exit-only" driveway is proposed on Monroe, approximately 100 feet south of the full-turning movement driveway. The proposal would result in the demolition of the existing Alexander's Auction building and redevelopment of the site. Construction would begin upon approval of necessary permits and would last approximately three months. Once operational, the Chevron station and convenience store would be open 24 hours each day, while the McDonald's would be open for 16 hours (from 6:00 am to 10:00 pm). 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on April 16, 1995 the Environmental Review.Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated for the Proposal. The combined comment/appeal period for the Environmental Determination ended at 5:00 pm on May 7, 1996. As of the preparation of this report no substantive comments were received and no appeals were filed. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. Credit may be given for the area of the demolished structure. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of the Building Permit. The applicant will need to comply with this requirement prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of $75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. Credit may be given for existing trips generated by the current site use that would be eliminated with the proposal. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. The applicant will need to comply with this requirement prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 3. The applicant shall limit construction traffic on the adjacent arterials during pre- loading activities to the hours between 8:30 am and 3:30 pm. The applicant will need to comply with this mitigation measure during the construction of the project. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner CHEVRON/MCDONALD'S ON NE 4TH STREET LUA-96-037, SA, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 14, 1996 Page 5 of 9 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-31-33 (D.) "The Hearing Examiner and City staff shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to discourage creativity and innovation. The site plan Review criteria include, but are not limited to, the following:" GENERAL CRITERIA: A. .CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS & POLICIES Policy LU-174: . Parking areas should be landscaped (including street trees, buffer, berms), especially along the roadways,to reduce the visual impacts. The proposal includes landscaping around the perimeter of the site, where the majority of site parking would be located. A combination of ornamental shrubs and sod is proposed. The sod would also serve as a biofiltration swale along the western edge of the property. In order to effectively provide buffering/screening between the proposed project and adjacent uses to the west, and along NE 4th Street, the applicant will be required to provide additional screening in the form of either a fence, trees or shrubs to increase separation and buffering along the western edge of the property (parking spaces 1-10). The selection of plant material should not conflict with the function of the biofiltration swale. Policy LU-175. Landscape buffers, additional setbacks, reduced height, and other screening devices should be employed to reduce the impacts (e.g. visual, noise, odor, light) on adjacent, less intensive uses. The applicant has proposed ornamental landscaping consisting of trees, shrubs, groundcover and sod lawn as part of the project. Photinia fraseri would be used as a buffer between the Chevron/McDonalds and the area zoned for residential uses that is located immediately to the south of the project site. Photinia establishes quickly and creates a solid landscape screen of a moderate height and is an appropriate plant selection to provide needed buffering between the land use designations. Policy LU-176. Increased demand for commercial uses should be accommodated through redevelopment and intensification of Employment Area - Commercial designations rather than expansion of those areas. The proposal would result in the redevelopment of a site in the Renton Highlands. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department - Preliminary Report to the Heating Examiner CHEVRON/MCDONALD'S ON NE 4TH STREET LUA-96-037, SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 14, 1996 Page 6 of 9 Policy EN-3. Minimize erosion and sedimentation by requiring appropriate construction techniques and farming practices. The applicant's Construction Mitigation plan includes temporary erosion and sedimentation control as required by City Codes. Policy EN-27. Control quantity and quality of stormwater run-off from all new development to be consistent with or improved over existing conditions. Currently the Monroe Avenue storm drain is an infiltration type system and experiences overflow that is partially attributable to maintenance and sedimentation control. Maintenance projects underway by the City will prevent further problems with runoff entering onto the subject property. To further assist with preventing-runoff from Monroe Avenue entering onto the site, the proposed driveway is proposed to be constructed with a slight berm. Policy EN-28. Minimize on-site erosion and sedimentation during and after construction. The applicant's Construction Mitigation plan includes temporary erosion and sedimentation control as required by City Codes. Objective EN-G: Provide a storm and surface water control and drainage system capable of preventing threats to life, property and public safety during a 100-year flooding event. The proposal would include a facilities for-the collection of stormwater and either conveyance to an underground retention/infiltration facility or discharge to the sanitary sewer system. A lined bio-swale as required in Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection Area would be provided along the western edge of the property. B. CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS The following requirements and development standards contained in Section 4-31-10.4 Arterial Commercial Zone (CA) of the Interim Zoning Code (adopted June 1993 requirements and development standards are applicability to this proposal 1. SETBACKS In the CA Zone, minimum setbacks are 0 feet and recent changes to the Zoning Code have eliminated maximum setbacks in the CA Zone. 2. HEIGHT Building height is limited to 50 feet. The proposal would result in structures that are no greater than 22 feet in height. 3. LOT COVERAGE Permitted lot coverage is 65% in the CA Zone. The proposal would result in 16.7% lot coverage. 4. PARKING REQUIREMENTS: Chapter 14, Title IV The proposed use requires a minimum of four parking spaces per 1,000 feet of gross floor area and not more than a maximum of 5 parking spaces per 1,000 feet of gross floor area for the Convenience Store (C-store). Since 1,919 square feet would be devoted to the C-store, the required parking would be a minimum of 8 spaces and a maximum of 10 parking spaces. The McDonald's combination sit-down/drive-in HEXRPT.DOC • • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner CHEVRON/MCDONALD'S ON NE 4TH STREET LUA-96-037, SA, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 14, 1996 Page 7 of 9 restaurant requires one parking space for each 75 square feet of gross floor area, or a maximum of 32 parking spaces required. The total required parking based on the applicant's proposal would be a minimum of 40 parking spaces and a maximum of 42 parking spaces. The applicant proposes 40 parking spaces, thus satisfying the requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. 5. LANDSCAPING In the CA Zone,lots abutting public streets must have a minimum landscaped strip of 15 feet. The applicant is providing a minimum of 15 feet of landscaping from the property lines along both NE 4th and Monroe. 6. ROOF-TOP EQUIPMENT All operating equipment located on the roof of any building shall be enclosed so as to be shielded from view, except telecommunications equipment. Building elevation indicate that the proposed mansard roof design would screen views of the roof (A/C and vent) equipment. 7. REFUSE AND RECYCLABLES COLLECTION &STORAGE The trash enclosure would be located on the southwestern portion of the subject site, and would be screened/enclosed on all sides, with an access point on the north. The location would not interfere with pedestrian access or site circulation. The Code requires screening on three sides, and the proposal complies. C. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES; The project site is adjacent to a gravel mining operation on the south and a vehicle repair business on the west. A cemetery is located across Monroe Avenue NE to the east, and a technical college is located to across NE 4th Street to the north. Other surrounding uses include commercial development and residential neighborhoods. The gravel mining site is designated for eventual redevelopment as housing. The applicant is providing for landscaped screening from the adjacent uses to the south and west. However, additional plant material should be incorporated into the site design to provide for increased screening for the site to the west. Staff suggests the extension of ornamental shrubs on the perimeter of the west property line, such that the shrubs do not interfere with the function of the bioswale. The site appears to be designed to allow the applicant to achieve their desired purpose without adversely impacting surrounding properties. D. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; The applicant's proposal will require construction activities that could result in on-site impacts. City Code requires that the applicant submit a Construction Mitigation Plan detailing methods to control stormwater and erosion during construction of the site. This parcel has experienced localized flooding in the past, and a combination of maintenance and the incorporation of a slight berm on the eastern property line (at the driveways)will help to solve this problem. E. CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES; The proposal would replace a use that was considered by some to be reducing area property values. The existing use buys and sells used goods, and often displays the same in the front HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner CHEVRON/MCDONALD'S ON NE 4TH STREET LUA-96-037, SA, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 14, 1996 Page 8 of 9 yard area. The structure has deteriorated over time, and is in need of repair. The proposal would result in the construction of a development that provides for a fully designed and utilized site, with appropriate circulation, signs, lighting, and landscaped improvements. The Chevron/McDonald's would be expected to enhance and conserve area-wide property values. F. SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION; The site has been designed to provide a separation between pedestrians and vehicles. Raised walkways would lead from the Monroe Avenue NE sidewalk to the convenience "store/McDonald's restaurant, and would avoid the necessity for pedestrian traffic to cross through the service station fueling areas and parking lot. Vehicles would have an access point from 4th Avenue NE and another from Monroe Avenue NE. An exit-only drive would serve the drive-through and escape/vehicle circulation areas. Since a portion of the raised walkway and entrance/exit doors on the east and south facades of the combination C-Store/McDonald's are near the drive-through lane, staff recommends that a metal railing be added along the south walkway to prevent pedestrians from wandering into the traffic exit lane. The restaurant would be expected to draw patrons from the nearby technical college, and these pedestrians would be walking .across the access driveways. Staff recommends that the applicant/owner install warning or STOP signs for drivers exiting the site, to increase awareness of pedestrians utilizing the surrounding sidewalks. G. PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; There is only one building and a canopy that would be constructed on the site. The structures would be separated by approximately 70 feet. Lot coverage would be 16.7%, and building heights would not exceed 22 feet. There would not be any adverse impact on light and air on- site or off-site. H. MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; The provision of gasoline and the cooking of food product could result in some localized odor impacts. This is not considered to be harmful or unhealthy. Noise would be produced during construction, but would be short-term in nature and would not be expected to impact off-site uses. AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE;AND Public services are already available to serve the project site. The applicant would need to provide any Code-required connections. J. PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The proposal including the architecture of the buildings and installation/maintenance of landscaping should prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight, and result in an improved aesthetic over current site development HEXRPT.DOC • City of Renton PB/PW Department — Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner CHEVRON/MCDONALD'S ON NE 4TH STREET LUA-96-037, SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 14, 1996 Page 9 of 9 H. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommend approval of the Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th Street, file no. LUA-96-037 subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee's April 16, 1996 Threshold Determination, prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. -Revised Landscape .Plan: :,The applicant is required_to.submit a revised.Landscape Plan with the Building Permit which provides for additional installation'and maintenance of ornamental shrubs along the western property line. The-shrubs should provide buffering without interfering with the operation of -the bio-swale. The selection of shrubs shall be approved by the Development Services Division. 3. Pedestrian Safety: The applicant shall submit a revised Site Plan with the Building Permit which provides for warning or STOP signs at site access/exit drives in order to address pedestrian safety. In addition, a metal railing providing for the separation of pedestrians and vehicles shall be incorporated into the site plan on the south side of the raised south facade walkway, and adjacent to the drive-through lane. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Site Plan Approvals (SA): Two (2)years from the final approval date. (Extensions may be requested.) HEXRPT.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-037,SA,tECF APPLICANT: Emerald City Construction c/o,Baurghausen Engineers (Bruce Creager) PROJECT NAME: Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th Street DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant requests.Environmental.Review (ECF) for re-development of the subject property with a Chevron Gas Station and convenience store with a McDonald's quick-serve restaurant. Three new underground fuel storage tanks would also be installed. The proposal also requires Site Plan Review (SA) and is subject to a public hearing since the adjacent property to the South is zoned and designated for residential use. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3209 NE 4th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have.a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not: required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). ,Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The 15 day.comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 p.m. on May 07, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. PUBLICATION DATE: April 22, 1996 DATE OF DECISION: April 16, 1996 SIGNATURES: Gr ,,,,, IC/7‘ ei me an,Administrator DA E Depart nt of Planning/Building/Public Works l C/76- 7am Chastain,Admini ator -°1 D E Community Srvice Department tv,„",0 qor /06, Le heeler, Fire Chief DA f Ren n Fire Departme DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-037,SA,*,,ECF APPLICANT: Emerald City Construction do Baurghausen Engineers (Bruce Creager) PROJECT NAME: Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th Street DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant requests Environmental Review (ECF) for re- development of the subject property with a Chevron Gas Station and convenience store with a McDonald's quick-serve restaurant. Three new underground fuel storage tanks would also be installed. The proposal also requires Site Plan Review (SA) and is subject to a public hearing since the adjacent property to the South is zoned and designated for residential use. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3209 NE 4th Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. Credit may be given for the area of the demolished structure. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of the Building Permit. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. Credit may be given for existing trips generated by the current site use that would be eliminated with the proposal. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 3. The applicant shall limit construction traffic on the adjacent arterials during pre-loading activities to the hours between 8:30 am and 3:30 pm. MITMEAS.DOC/ CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-037,SAM,ECF • APPLICANT: Emerald City Construction do Baurghausen Engineers (Bruce Creager) PROJECT NAME: Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th Street DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant requests Environmental Review (ECF) for re- development of the subject property with a Chevron Gas Station and convenience store with a McDonald's quick-serve restaurant. Three new underground fuel storage tanks would also be installed. The proposal also requires Site Plan Review (SA) and is subject to a public hearing since the adjacent property to the South is zoned and designated for residential use. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3209 NE 4th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General 1. The applicant shall apply with all applicable City, state, federal and other jurisdictional regulations,codes and policies governing the project and site. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate submittals prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, according to City of Renton drafting standards. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000, 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000; and 3%of anything over$200,000. One-half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits,and the remainder when the permits are issued. 3. The applicant is required to obtain a Construction Permit in order to accomplish site work and installation of site improvements. 4. Construction plans must comply with the City's Drafting Standards. 5. The project requires Site Plan Review. A public hearing before the City's Hearing Examiner will be held following the completion of the comment/appeal period for the Environmental Determination. Storm Drainage 6. There is no System Development Charge (SDC) for storm water applicable to the project if storm water runoff is handled via infiltration as noted in the Storm Drainage Report. 7. Storm detention and biofiltration is required on-site per the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 8. Storm drainage facilities are required per the King County Surface Water Design Manual. ' Chevron/McDonald's on Fourth LUA-96-037,SA,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 2 9. The project site is located within Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection Area which requires that biofiltration swales are lined. 10. Existing localized flooding on the site from Monroe Avenue NE shall be addressed by the applicant via the construction of the proposed driveways with a slight berm, per the applicant's Level 1 Drainage Analysis. Wastewater 11. The applicant is required to provide a grease interceptor as part of the kitchen in order to remove fats,oils, and grease. The grease interceptor must be shown on the construction drawings. 12. The property is subject to the Special Assessment District (SAD0002) wastewater charge of $3,787.13. The SAD charge is payable at the time the Construction Permit is issued. 13. The System Development Connection charge for this property has already been paid. 14. A connection to the sanitary sewer is available on Monroe Avenue NE. Water 15. The applicant is responsible for the payment of a latecomer fee of$3,940.75 for water system development. The latecomer fee is payable at the time that the Construction Permit is issued. 16. The proposed project is located in Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. The applicant will be required to meet all applicable sections of the Aquifer Protection Area Ordinance. 17. The available fire flow is 5,000 gpm. 18. A backflow prevention device is required for the irrigation system and domestic service. 19. The applicant is required to pay a Water System Development Charge of$6,202.12. Fire 20. The applicant is required to pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee as discussed in the Impact and Mitigation discussion. The Fire Mitigation Fee is $0.52/square foot of the convenience store/restaurant building, and is estimated to be $2,260.00. The fee is payable at the time the building permit is issued. Credit may be given to the new construction for any existing building that is demolished. The applicant will need to coordinate with the Fire Department to determine whether any reduction in the mitigation fee applies to the proposal. . 21. The preliminary required fire flow is 2,750 gpm. Three fire hydrants are required; one within 150- feet of the building and two within 300 feet of the building. 22. Separate plans and permits are required for underground storage tank installations and kitchen hood fire protection systems. Parks and Recreation 23. The owner/tenant shall maintain landscaped areas outside of the property line but within the street right-of-ways. Police Services ADVNOTES.DOC/ • • Chevron/McDonald's on Fourth LUA-96-037,SA,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 3 24. The applicant is advised to coordinate with Renton Police Crime Prevention for recommendations to reduce possibility of theft and vandalism during site and building construction. Building Construction 25. The applicant's soils engineer is required to approve footing excavations prior to the placement of any concrete on the site. Transportation & Street Improvements 26. The City's Transportation Mitigation Fee will apply to the project as discussed in the mitigation measures above. The applicable fee is $75 per each new average daily trip and is estimated to be $43,500.00. Credit may be given for existing trips that the current site use generates which would be eliminated with the proposal. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that the Building Permit is issued. 27. One street light will be required on NE 4th Street,just east of the ingress/egress driveway. This will be a condition of the Site Plan Review/Approval. The applicant will need to submit a revised Site Plan showing the location of the street light prior to the public hearing. 28. The applicant will be required to revise the Site Plan to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division to locate the back edge of the sidewalk at the property line. The minimum width of the sidewalk must be five feet, and the minimum width of the planting strip must be five feet. Revisions to the Site Plan drawings should be made prior to the public hearing. Solid Waste 29. The Site Plan must show the location of garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points. All garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. ADVNOTES.DOG DEVELOPMENT SERVICES EIS REVIEW COMMENTS CHEVRON/QSR 3209 NE 4th St. By Clinton Morgan • 277-6216 TRANSPORTATION: 1. Transportation mitigation fee is$43,500.00 to be paid at time the building permit is issued. 2. Back edge of sidewalk to be located at the property line. The minimum width of sidewalk is 5 feet and a minimum planter strip of 5 feet. 3. One Street light require on NE 4th St. Just east of driveway. 96CM078 �l � �� 3, Sob � DO 7 x 5 96CM078.DOC/ l6Z : 06, .?..,......:.v..........:.:f:.:....TRAtV.SP..,.QR.TATlO N:?.:.n11�Tt.�i4.....t.(J.�...F .........:............,.:.::.::.: • Project Name ( 40.-1r,'e`r'I nc/Jina� � ON47v ' Itt E Project Address 3 La 9 N �Sf Donis Contact Person 1--es/- e r A /cx n cl e v Address I5 lY 30 SE, .t'-�,..L�-, - 7S5.a valz Ind, Phone Number /_��rf�ra ifs e-y, "S ec-r5 /F 'vice Crea3r( 2 4)2SI -hZZZ Permit Number //�� �� Project Description `•""'t--' rez & aS 5 ale-5 4J G -S-f e t-� a-•- M C P o 1 cL S Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: ❑ Residential ❑ ITE Trip Generation Manual iErrietaii B"Traffic Study ❑ Non-retail 0 Other Calculation: T,5 X S o = 3 �oa d .,5 il• ID Transportation Mitigation Fee: 73) 6-°19' � ,� o9' Calculated by: ��t�? �t �-o��-� Date: 40 / / Account Number: 105/5Q4. s i&.7O. 00. 16 Date of Payment •City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: SeylI,(c.LL COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 9, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-037,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 02, 1996 APPLICANT: EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING CIO BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERS f:r7rr •••-,QoN PROJECT TITLE: CHEVRON/McDONALDS ON FOURTH WORK ORDER NO: 78073 LOCATION: 3209 NE 4TH STREET APR o a ig96 SITE AREA: 1.3 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 7,5Q4,$Q.ETNG D IViON SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT REQUESTS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(ECF)AND SITE PLAN AFP OVAL (SA)FOR RE-DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH A CHEVRON GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE, WITH A QUICK SERVE RESTAURANT. THREE NEW UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS WOULD ALSO BE INSTALLED. THE PROPOSAL REQUIRES SETBACK VARIANCES(V)FOR THE PUMP ISLAND AND CONVENIENCE STORE, AS THEY WOULD EXCEED THE MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK ALLOWED. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare _ Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Ly.)d C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 5o I L5 6062,m601. To f NYJ fry Itte r!L]&' ocLt cJk1io005 Ma, TD ifiltgligfir Dk A'iO C CII , Wi • = • 'awed this a• i!ation with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas w '�.1 n/ f• a y L/s eede to properly assess this proposal. 1/446, Sig,. re o I'ector or Authorized Representative Date DE APP.DOC Rev.10/93 • • • City or rtenton Department of Planning/Building/Pub►►iW Vorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: paxiers COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 9, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-037,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 02, 1996 APPLICANT: EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING C/O BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERS PROJECT TITLE: CHEVRON/McDONALDS ON FOURTH WORK ORDER NO: 78073 LOCATION: 3209 NE 4TH STREET SITE AREA 1.3 ACRES 1 BUILDING AREA(gross): 7,504 SQ.FT. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT REQUESTS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(ECF)AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA)FOR RE-DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH A CHEVRON GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE, WITH A QUICK SERVE RESTAURANT. THREE NEW UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS WOULD ALSO BE INSTALLED. THE PROPOSAL REQUIRES SETBACK VARIANCES(V)FOR THE PUMP ISLAND AND CONVENIENCE STORE, AS THEY WOULD EXCEED THE MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK ALLOWED. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ae 71n41 ---,L,e-tTe 7 qD/ tom- C, ad.4r)')V `17. g a-Yr" 7r2i)-vvii-C_ ee----rviafe-4/,72te7( C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. it(7'/Sly '/Signature of Direc or Authorized Representative Da DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES EIS REVIEW COMMENTS CHEVRON/QSR 3209 NE 4th St. By Clinton Morgan 277-6216 • WATER: 1. Latecomer Agreement(pvt)for water is$3,940.75. 2. System Development Charge for water is$6,202.12. 3. Preliminary required fire flow required per Fire Department is 2,750 gpm. Available fire flow is 5,000 gpm. One fire hydrant required for each 1000 gallon of required fire flow. 4. The primary hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building, but not closer than 50 feet and the secondary hydrants must be within 300 feet of the building. 5. A back flow prevention device is required for irrigation system and domestic service. 6. The development is located in Aquifer Protection area zone#2. A special code provision for lining of the bioswale must be followed. 7 Project drawings to follow City of Renton drafting standards. 96CM077 96CM077.DOC/ • O�Y Chi CITY OF RENTON 41�'NTC� MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1996 TO: Jennifer Henning - Senior Planner FROM: Jim Gray - Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Chevron QSR - Northeast 4th Street and Monroe Avenue Northeast The following represent the Fire Department comments associated with the above- subject matter: 1. Preliminary required fire flow.is 2,750 gpm. Three fire hydrants are required; one within 150-feet of the building and two within 300-feet of the.building. 2. The Fire Mitigation Fee is $.052_per square foot for the building = 4,350 x $.052 = $2,262.00. This fee is due at the time the building permit is issued. Credit may be given to the new construction for any existing building that is demolished. Provide the Fire Department with the square footage for the existing building 3. Separate plans and permits are required for underground storage tank installations and kitchen hood fire protection systems. Contact me if you have any further questions. • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES EIS REVIEW COMMENTS CHEVRON/QSR 3209 NE 4th St. By Clinton Morgan 277-6216 • WASTEWATER: 1. Property subject to The Special Assessment District(SAD0002)wastewater charge of$3,787.13. The system connection fee has been paid. 2. The Kitchen will require a grease interceptor per the pluming code and needs to be shown on the plans. 3. The sewer connection is available on Monroe Ave.N.E. STORM: (Surface Water) 1. •_ Storm drainage facilities require per the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 2. Storm detention and biofiltration require on per King County Surface Water design Manual. 3. There will be no storm system connection charge if the storm water runoff is via infiltration as noted in the Storm Drainage Report Analysis. 96CM075 WO#78073 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pd‘1ce, COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 9, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-037,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 02, 1996 APPLICANT: EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING C/O BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERS PROJECT TITLE: CHEVRON/McDONALDS ON FOURTH WORK ORDER NO: 78073 LOCATION: 3209 NE 4TH STREET SITE AREA: 1.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA(gross): 7,504 SQ.FT. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT REQUESTS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(ECF)AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA)FOR RE-DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH A CHEVRON GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE, WITH A QUICK SERVE RESTAURANT. THREE NEW UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS WOULD ALSO BE INSTALLED. THE PROPOSAL REQUIRES SETBACK VARIANCES(V)FOR THE PUMP ISLAND AND CONVENIENCE STORE, AS THEY WOULD EXCEED THE MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK ALLOWED. A. 'ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing - Air Aesthetics Water . Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation 3- as'_ f 1 c e ea I l Po( service_ es (n oL a n/wilyj ku M WiteA.5/ Me_ io L acft cal ciiS co it mach J )e �o s OF sits i� h' f - n ! n �- Su� �� Cvn��u�,7�r�� will �.(�� S e'rI L Cfinu O sum as Ht t- U 2Ul ltb 14 T)C i a is Cie(_ / 110(a ll5m ma era/S geed f hb locked up whin /7 -n itsv mcitedi all is - Zeceonnd recur til- 11917/7 or-1- ce7ce fo ids Wong 3I0L ` 'uz- oLnl/6 -o. p (kite_ ►tte.D1 S W((tdOl i • -1164- Cu 1 ( Pice_ pe&siyeet ris 17 f at 65 Wu_ actr4 cb yr ugh - of c • reccOntuicta eyo3s-urd b fain ( cleactia9 f nu OMMEN7S rjj)°9g s C2 #3y Ai 516U i 11c- - WI) Connect W; fecf slxx- ence, Gad n • 9ecUsfrI S Who ex if , reji-o ufa e ( 0911 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. L/ llt7 'i'4 )'1aN - g Signature of Director` Aut •rized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 FIG. 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN • NE 4th Street ]o'd Cana I' 127d f T j 1405.F. MAX- FACE 2 15'HIGH 3 I s I , 1 3S >s- Ix I @ @ 1 ®—II GI) 6 '36'X 6]' I I I 6 YPD CANOPY I •© ® ' ` O 1 AIR/WATER 015PQ SZR • X PARKING 6 I I.@ \I O • 0 , ,I t�e—® • I 1 PAY TELEPHONES I I I ‘ rlitc....i 4OS .COO] I IIGN. WA. ME 15' �' HIGH 12 I 0 *(W1 «- I oI is � I26)11.I e: ..6.14 I 69 ` \ I II L m r1 m is I a35 36 37 36 \�\ 3 40 $ _ 30 I c g <8 1sC �� I0 :—STORE : I� ..11s '• • 16 cc ,J:> tl� 17 / \ 7� ts, wrcNEN OIL 1511 i eve/ !y/ rteoPoss a«rr . \i POLE 1OCAnoN . , PHASE IIB 21 I / ( � .. 401i ; Ji\e g / rs,-- 24 23 26 27SI _ P —iv X 16 n--196D0' / TRASH ENCLOSURE / TITLE: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN: / CHEVRON W/C—STORE & QSR -- FOR: EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION 19119 NORTH CREEK PARKWAY SUITE 101 DriTLIC1 t IAIA 110I\11 . - .. . : • • . . . —§ 8: G.,i‘. '!IA''T-.":747.v.-."-14.-•-?;.- .'\'rs.''''-Z7j•i•r c''';',4-:•‘;)• '''• I ''•,\A'1\ Es. • ...1:,‘,.% • E..‘,%. .....4,1.,:. ..., I ,\t. \,. 5.,‘. k... ..I.1.‘,..,,,I. .,..... , .„tk,. t .. 'I ,......-4...::t ;:fr':•,..%z,e,:•,'.:•., . •••-?. .1 .1-,1, ..s..-.•: h ::•-•,`9c.:::+ry ''•'' •"'.--,-.. •!,- •s•.... .,+;L).:3-'.k.'...;,,'. '' ''' °l'ET.--,:::',.;', '''',.'1-14;•,1_-_-11,.. •,' l 2:'-j::'.7;'i:›-•%-, . m ': • -/-',:47."Dv',,--7') i • ',! A r vi--...-- 1,-: • :'1.1 7'4';'•:N,'-,--..--..z‘`1",=•'4.-IA :11----t•-•Fe`e,..• ....% .• i,‘\.:,::. 0:p i7---•-•.:-,2 'A.!:-.^-4,-7-•-•-••,--..-,..--i-P,..,•r- •••:,-,-,••':•••\, •- - .,' 7 ••••••7.: 7-i.','".":.:77-1 4.LII•I'l.,<'•/, '`'',.!ii l'.'• ,.."\ ' , •:1.„ i,----,--,- ,.,:.\..3•4_i•.:,.,1.22..._,ii,A--,..,.2_,,_,A.,1;•..-- .. .,1 r.--...:-.:',...:.1 :•::::•,--...:-r: .-. ....1..<;.•;7•,./....,,...rz..--•..,‘ . 'f -----,1 ‘:',::, 6X '.. '.7-'-'-;!r-..''Ef..'•‘‘•••1:XX T;K-iv,'•;:j. '...'2:12_,_i,:1.12.Ls..--: •- ----" .._, .,..., . -.------77,-. '.f ir,-,-..:,...,7-- ,:::;-,,,.7;7-17-......4-77:;77'.tt4•••• ., N ‘•'. . ' i • ' "•-•'^'" L. l 1.,,`''C'''.."7-‘1.3'''''\'' ,,,j i ft.s.--•,-...4.-,,C,.. ' .....-r . \''';',t--• .- --'7`. ---:----'-''—.'.71;.•%^'1.4.. ‘?::11% i"-., 'I. I1 ,..q ::,.;.;...,i•,.i i,,,,..;'1 ..,„..,..•;...:,..•,:--2-2-1-7t4,.r,, •-'Lil:_,,-t 1 I t*- \\,....:‘'•• . .. .•- -.:•.•-•..,.,: .. .sq?,------- ii...,--Fn_tkA_ .." „........,. 1.,.:::...6-.:4:',‘‘..sie,.••-, ,r•Th• ‘••'''..••--__, :,- • • j.... \,‘ ''-• - ;•• : ••141-:;•::4.';•.,,,!;•.4:,•‘....- ;`,0.•,,v;IA,: Zy.7•T•r":.'w il: •' i '\...•.- .i .+ .I :1Z-1P:7Z,',/%,:t.•;14r.• +Z.•••:.Q_WL N -.L. ...•-••• . . __ ! .,, . , ,. .•‘,„.„. ..„, _ . _ ,_.... •„A ,i• '4 Z •‘•:,,. ..... .. .. \..,1 4.1,, ••''.1, . ,„*": %„.• th-lt• iN p 1-%, / 1 M Ns• L'',''',,,:,.s,i,...,.,..„,°•"4 "... ..,,,, '''s,' :!1..- ''''''.'",...t.-..,...1 rt- - „r• ..*is A LT`A.4, . ' ' .\•'i -1!'1:.• ---• ‘. 0 X' V • •‘ '••1-1 .j: ---'-.. / \..e 1 I G••• , a ;I.," ; • .1"::r,'4..e';'..',‘. co ,t I .•:• i,,1,-iv ,lt,,h 0 .c•• Lii: .:II! .\'. ., . — . m / ; N,,,,-.--,;•;_i j 1 k 4-.41-rilt \\:-...,,____L_____Aj; .' j• E i 0 O.: SIZILIA l•! ''' M!..r.'-- 76: ,-,..1.-1: 7.--) - f---- , . .. •- .... _ _ - --1 • R . , 'z'....,_ >• , 74 . - . . • • . • ,'-'-'1-y.'" mi• .- I.= si., .01 t`';•:;-=,--.'a ;.' K ito ,-- 0 _ A , / I 71 t' ••,.,,, ,.,.',•:... I, / . e ::!:‘,- Ia \. 0% ,.. a. : •:•,.,.. •Vs '4'•• ... ••:,••''''' ..t•gg..,-• -. — % — 1 '1"•---'. "V;-774..•• .._...j'• 4, 1 ..27 T= '.= Eil, ..;,/.‘. 1.7.j., -Asim a AZ ( s .,v...-71 • ., •- ..r'-,--A},-: •y's- ..., .4'. .. ...--- 1: • 11:-..y4..,. •7.I ‘ik\ • -......... 1,.. : ' • II 1 7.4". '1 *‘-'; --. 'E,•••• q:•••!.1.5.' ••••• .1.14..L.,.!1,...1 in. •EN 2 I 2. '• :, ,"E:'-•1 •I'1"4.! 11-.:2•.-.4....Ar, .‘ -.- et — ,. -- ..... . •• ...— hii.•fc -71 -$ ---°1. , E' 0. !.... TS ,,_ . ---r------ • ---- .±,.,..1 -7—Ts I, - _____ . ,,, • ,% . • .. __..______*!1.I ' " q,• .„. "i -.--. • 1 , _._--'. -'I1'„-•'--T'r • ')..t • •E: 1. . • 1--"1-..—!---,•----.,--...-,—r. ..--:-'I , 4 ., • ‘1._. • •I : I • 1,, , ' •1 • L. ....... I A Ll-,. • il li:t -- ..1...1•!,..L I ....— Mt). .......... C....,.. '"" For: Q. { • . CHEVRON WITH OSR 5660 ,r Pk_A ('',-.O.L:.,i'-6r3:' EMERALDAND LAKCNITYA INVESTMENTS SON NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP G14•44.0 ,e.,15 7'0D 2‘,.•••E Scr.fill • -..& (2J6)2!,1-87•32 i. SWC NE 4th AND MONROE ST.NE 19119 NORTH CREEK PKVVY SUITE 101 '••••••• '; ,.,....p h• .... ••••• .," •:,-..DA.NI,on,,./.... RENTON.WA BOTHELL,WA 98011 We PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN ' • . • - �1. ' ° till A T-20' , I r I I ;�►. fEHION • .µ1M • • 1. • I r•1 — vlcYrrr MAP — a 6 § I Il ' I LEUAL.oEsc*HPTlON • .--.11. � . ,.��'�_,.,.�. � i ' ".--- ---._I�OEX TO RAN3 ' a W ,•r • J•1' f _. _ ]_I[$'PA4MG r�i ' �'� -' j" mar n7 ♦ N el'e.'e)'C - 'leDN' — -. ej. .. I , a cr.....W rY.6i" z H PC/ .... . I I �"�J -I I I •• I- :' `' ` •- V.Tir eo.... . I. • I I; 1 .� ...',;-'ate... . ••••I M,a v.tear,, ' Z 3 z / nal 0 1 a• ,r1)o n •e I v i I1•'. A.r '° �I ,, u n m , • ) e a e "a _ '4. j •4..I tar a m. I- 2 Y 1_ i I ' I !. .. I I r ., I1li -II - i� ,• I I I SriE DATA z CO a- ir Z l • 1 I O Y TRASH anwnC I �. ^! I 11 ;I ` I I I : •..y s.... ,o,r,. O z W u=i I , r ! �, f- I. I sae,...Arc c..,-,.15.sr. W sk \__.„ - r .. ,••oV f•.."I W c.m./mr-,.au v. Y — Q x. fro.., r -1 •.�i51'='' * Q as-200 v. F-ZS _ („) ae Y i i I— w i•.. I .L.. 1 r.'•9 01•Ww4 a+r- ./. J J Q Ill �w.er c�sr..- e/am U. w .�. Q O S o) ,",/ m wort '''' I i a - +qre u. .„ro cc Z i— • se 1 �d, W I r..rr In.+r•.F a•...e.a/:•.....? t0 m m L,,�„ I 1 Z a mud ,) ,wm.'siaa• Via. •.j ?'. • ' 'i Oa.,rove,.erinde mamma'....r r ,._v_ ),•-a•.t•r- ,:m:r i MGM I li ili' a1 Mead ,r `;'f 1 , I,sr.YN.Ira • ; I I, e' r )_. M a.- ...rr.e. , k ; 70 aroma og •q a i • J. o-r../033 rr -�r; -a°'-� 1' .r_v I .a•a•.4 . .r.r f.'?' _ •. i I �l r.+v,tn.eal raam U. I I I I 1 t F Oil 151, a,1 c w -• —__ _ i t I i , i :1 NOTES �rr II PHASE IIB" <� ' I D `, •• `•I♦ ' .j 11 I. ,.r,cm.*tw-e.P...•rs+a.,Wm.,K.tawdry..".oM...•••0 6 • �(/(•����//��� a am WO 11,did 1 I 11 -•n j 1 : ! •••400.1 00Madr,Y.eM..1.AM)•fr•rw)Gam,PM. �.. ;' f � f _RI.M i; �e Ju ° ' 1.1•1'.1 11 i ' d li Y R , ! I I ' I I I 1 rP,or rACI \ 1 I it Ir ,am.c cs • 1g ,a b 11 u.O+r.•C1 { x:. '• am SIMDa. _ _:I I - W [0 2 la r®iqr4• r-v.,vw.C.u---I -- - --- - - rat--- - .• ^s.,- - - .. - _ .1, mrs+.cr + _ _. .. .,_I L tors r ..� j ..,., •I um MOOD MVO ._ -nn, - _"'r • iN DOG MOM rm �.. �+ + .... • MONROE AVENUE NE —M/rRr ( �.e •a 11 �' .: 4,4, ••a,. •, ti ca , .v %', nIu®moot I.`' .. .,.� _ / i nu®rm rMa O Oda V 9-1 • �I • i m � • PRELIMINARY GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN li)) . . ,•.zo' ° \` \ \ _ �u�sE.'En•.as , ry;_i', _° - - .. ,. •. Ti i 1 • • 1 1�/ I I toG a / I ' : " <4i u -- oI1 ` • _ - " l �\, er ..I pl ._y i I j : HF II Y s- EwaI -.� nn NEST 1111(i l'((�ri��;'%;'f' J'I- \ B 1MTION `c_._._ /; >n'�•:,:..•.. .. I __ - � - I I �)` aI - O I I �i wam c1` I'...,, _ i 1 NIr uRAnoN c,;, ' r i:' .,• 4 .i_I l E.,.e5b' .. I.or .ar rxacmn I11 + ` N orJ.vr[ z°om• -- —- - "-"_' Z'cO MEA(a/JJ/ae) '' \\t\, I I rt^cE ttlRtCv dI ]T -...___.._ ' 1, O z I I I I II I I)I II I rtxcE N. �... or ..� �Y—co aRE r r 1�I :I. \ °°.E" _ — I I III \ I \;/ ..._..t ... ... • I `mnE.l-eS OY m co 1 /I I I)I 1 '\usr rs oi's !_., -[.�- . .r-.tn.. STORNWATER RETENTION w.�rcJ" ••• V F- IT '�``.\ o''e'aoc°�m: En 1 E `l i, ro i _n..e a en. I'll,' iR: 1' c -ea s.• Z Y I 1 I t ;�\t \' ; \ i • �. 11 . VE PER RArzD- o'ate: Ili I a ¢ m p 4; I I'I).� I •hI ' '•1 '. i1/: i _ NR,TRATI�N) \\\\\\\\\\I�• ; 11.II I4�ES 1Ui:' i (thPlfAl) F- i 1111 IT? .. \'\\LW — l` �` ! ' :I`LiSy:�'� I-\\\\C\\\`Lisp\\� 1 I j1 iH IIII T 7 :..;`. `V Al. likSIN >µ � \\\\\\\\��\\ • I4' j )� >jI j it 1 i \\�\\\\ `i e�i I I 'iu i7- . VMSCRO• •.� S. I I RECUIa. 'V :.,. �+1_.6..°an "/7 DOY COLLECTOR: r I - > ~ I ...E• -e3 Sa' Sr) x x I I I 14b{LEM�. \. , /�"L0f'"uy' '/i ~t DIRECnYI TO RET.STST. _ Q 1« • *4�. 5' Y 1- -I dill I I I I �i4 ,,Y Ni � .� (9rvAsslmosxuE) i' SI~ -J -I ¢ Ill J I I I IP ,. ,yr,,e. I ;. I ,% GTCN Bl�IN nl"'1-"r.' 1 v Q z F a 11 I I 1 j I I I I ��" ,, / ,. ��. aeo RI4.,]g,D a, w ® o !4�8 I I I I 1 1 1 I �� ,' J! I Ilh —__ 1 DRENCH DRAIN i.•7. '>�.'' - �>;' Z W �. ; ,I 1 I I I III 1€i1 4 —�� -7—I O� . _'I Toiumb01r,G 1 °©. • Ot sTORr • 'II .i i LL re - .• ^$'� I I I I' ,'r` J,I FROM SIC UWATE1 1 I y , ^9�e ggEEfppf II s', r�- 1':? .Y-v �I _'� N° I TRENCH DMIN . II 1 I i SRUtF/. 'IP 'd :' TO COLLECT j I ^ Sa ' a 1 cunt (��-1 _ r� I .yI. 1x MFA DENGTN I ¢i R D SS�vOO'p TER ao\. 1� ■ • 9r,� I J,~, ®. .: (C )TO W I I I1. i _ 'rtrc[ca+xU a�I '�I �/ GT[}I1 .Ta1.51.51- -_ -'i:� �-- •) _-_______ _I sa'��', r I I{1 BLDO. < • J RI4 iTN.FlA 'I ,_r01 `�'/;�1, OIL/HATER,• :,b� z ai If °o Ea 3�.8 •N= i... I: I''Y'I t++I g SEPARATOR ° _^I! : .E 'annl /.. 1 341.4 r I I \.. u TD SW. ( 'I v s"�:Tc »> ice'/, RJ9LC__ .. I I, SD" '' :I. 1. ,3 _/-eoa --"I{ 3J1.9 W 0 v ngya..55 . n .tl ��..�!___I•�I 14 NOVTON gi "./ f --' '=L __ _ _.._ Z��-,�u}51 .__. �S ,-� `Y i ;�.�,� •� �'^ �3 _ r aim e '-SATE. c SMgE.lelC �PC t' _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ - - __ U°U°IL KLLGL S.°mE ----.+•... ...—_ _ __ _ _ - MnM./.cp+x@ate_ t^ .', .. _ _.. ./��_ _._ r_____,_ __ - �owaE.iuoinstwi� - - J H \ `MONROE'AVENUE NE � Eow K •E.•...' ,�° • - -. ."I1 Vi/.an�a•(.960,N .°not .§Q)....S ME aaroui Et��.�`^ a aD e�sag 340.5 ' vr�t_n I ; 10 1 t»WO... °..r.•01/15/11.. CNN) W.t-m Waft bed VOW :ee.o-sseew.:xu-° , PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN ( l' 1 " is .,..,— —„11 1 0052.ORE WIDO , RNE 1%20 N. N. 1 1 g -,-, ---,,, . • •1.10042 LOW,. . / i% .'•.., 'X'. SUFNLYORS FOTE I 4. / . 4 . i I'.' I' .. . .... -... - - . -•-. ' /•-• . GM 2.) '''', ____, ....--..._.._.... _-. ... ...._ •- ... . tl 1 • /II r I--II --.-- W : It. • ,I Z t I u • . . .. _.;:g igil It : 11, , ..... . MO RD./. _.. ........._.-. riIRS NT.65 74a = ...... ..„...,.. ...., :LI:. li .1 • --. _.• FR.PR AT PK..• .. • .' FROM NORM•NISI MINER,AM.POPO i, r.,„,,R : ...!0„.1,i •-,4. ..•• I 6 / , •I, , .. ., .s 0.I.N•0 5.• • f., .73 ,. '' -'-.---- _I, --- • . • GP'is G.'OE'S. (I' ...,..,•'. . .... ........,, \/: .......),,,.... 11 IIJ 11- ' •0 2.N.OF PROPERTY r. l''.' Z ' 1, .I . • 0 i \: ° CORNER(2/22/26) -•••• •• a 0 05 ..-. '‘`....2 M.Ter'orroos .1 Zo'-'-_,....,_ cr.rr-•;ow-..„- ' —•. r f,...:PM:::1:::02. 04.40.0 TO. . N. U.. ,....0.......f....,.....SEPEPRS.••.040. ...,. F.: cn R co FR.NORTH MD • -• /.. ,., ., l' .i : , • •i • : :•.•.•'.1.••• i • : 0 .../.' .... r., ,- MT IS 0 2.S.• I ' ' -... -- IX UST OF 112 . 7,-,:h7,-,,, - -- ,.. .I... lki n .... ).- z PROPERTY CORKER s NE •- .. CC ill 0 I\ .9, 23 22' 2' 22.'‘3, .2 Er '10 kl. 1:.15 1:41"1.7 12 11 10. 9 0 , „ . °,"[-7. , '''' 'I:: 1 . • . .• 1 i POLE i- 2 1_ co I- X 4 \ ,.....090t .. • . . .i l..-/ I• !... . 'I. .'.1•' '': ' z -,.•,,, --. .: 0 Ili 56 -4 IS•2 10 .._IIS\4 •..--. I ;. >.."...NPE NT.42 4e• I ' I'' • 4. ,.0 Wm : 1 l-1 _,, I -.. , 1 1 WATER SERVICE ' ifROLIvIADER TO BLDG., ,„;•••..„,_ Z UJ U) ..- -POKR .1,11 • 24 ' 1 :/ ).,`, .• . 1 iit'W I . •I It; •... ,,' ..,' ,n/....2'"' I . 1...,.--14:- ccoss ••• 1 r.,,," --, . ...-.i • : PROPOSED OWE — l• 1 .CDp.' ' .c) ' *• • .'":- :: ; -i: .1 . . . o < -1 -I cr co . ,: .-'. i ,.....-:4F i d . . ' cc 13 z 1- I ..... 27 ' • . , 1 14 , • - •-:4e. 1 ', i ". I U•1 FO , 0 •, •RIA..29. 00050 I 14;,;‘,1,! ;......:.:... ,, 'l.---:- \• I. 1. ILI i . - i I • M ,_ in 1 CREASE ; ;•:. INTERCEPTOF ../ • ' t____CS . . 1 •''•••• , I •• 5 E LAI ; ' i - 1 CD• •(..D I ; .'. •... \:Exsr.WA1ER 145ER r) O. .- . * ..,* • .I(SIZE AND LOCAnON I I r .; W. •.cr•c4ra / : I I * • r:TO BE COHFIRsoo) ; . I I ro, Hy to, / 41- e GR i - ,i. , . • • ' . i J i i 5 ' /I 1 ' a' ; , j:, P 1.1Ny ••:. .- -'- og c-s-row ..6/-;;;;21 '' im)- k' . .am t. N • ;1 1 " 1 1 g Ila k i\41 \ • INN . .'---":!--_1 'IrT4\_ : j L. .14 Acro alt i _.A' .:-.. • .r''''-!1., : :1; 1 ! I,• ' 1 11111 'cr.Ent cr.cr•LE•Vs I ' I;•i..' r MACK , OIL 1511- V I I X 2 PHASE 1113 'L won ,ril . . • ,• i i. IQM1 3/4'WAlER , r MSS Dr.CN . C.... I‘t 0' C"'"' i ..,•,,,...., . I AlR/WATER AT PRSPWTY CORNER . ,,, DISPENSER .• 1. 11. '-' .slur r•-f,a,Ff.',I'.. ... . - Load.. ooss.wo rwo ,T Ils•14. '.. g i A.i . 1, . i, I! .-•- - ' \ , . • N.7-/' . : . . - . ,I.! ' !.1'.:1 • I I. I, '\ -L..... MAT •PO, .. . • • • 1DOST.SIDE SEWER. . ".. AK''D'r -.'''' • L....:'„ . I. . ,. ... t..; ...t...-t...tt ''''. -+- h.. ' l'. -'''"' , . .ll • 1 if ,.....,i.corm....2.,E .4 r.'''P'7:3• e ---' -- ----•--'-.--.*.- -..---. --. -1;Zai TT-.-I.RIPA . -'-' ---nsif-cmalk"H---- --- --- -- - Owed morlr-toror -'-- -- • .25, T •or II -4,, .....\.-_:.:- i i. , , .C.STRUCTIO,NTERSECRON .. .4. I i.1 I.! ".•••.. (2/22/941) NSO IS CRY or r -MONROE AVENUE NE . -mow.occipsisa' .,_ _ „ ,. ,., 2. RENTON LION.CNT NO 1302 \ "" \ m . past.nRE HYDRANT - • ,oT,,'..Z.o,,,, 15 c5 . • N,PPANI 4., \'!' ' ...: : _...... ;;.„,,,,,.„..., ,,-„ 1[oat or-or.or i 4 30 CIL STN. u.•M4y., .1./......•02,4,996 II 14 Sca.1,0 Wit.I.14.Cm.. .60.3..80-TS5660-tl. • • . . . . .. . . .. . • . . . . • . . . - - . . . • • PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN"" • 4. k � I va• • �m wMCA� - ., 'x; sxoq,p1N C=a ,.,.[�°..° r .i r_.': \� ',,. .C..:. %En'i�`"D,r a •.I•-. :•'' _ __..___ s 1 •� D.Eq — t I I15• w. .___ a cDvnq -In.[q -E -~ —' I m ._ ... •w____._. '^ 1/KgWEq .ES, I [.5 �[r �,E _ -- -..w. 1 .• -it._ _ - zrs�`"f-I---- f I.lIIl1!•`Itltl�f�`19°:gy,1fIZ 1!: I.r fi�'R l79"rtlrEq.i - :ecm _�1 _�I ?: I I-� y_ I ._..___ Oz F- 0 ,�E� � I F .- co [ �K ,.S.I. p .1(I i�„F 0.4wfbs..J..l.(1 iYe k.fea, ;q6% ,Sit folfi►•aiv Iv v ►i :! "--CT 4l 1 I r__ __� - [r- "9.--i5 .•r•� ,__ F rr,rta•.,ate.q '� S1 rY/lr9%/tii:a[ 1�JJ'.✓.r.1 1J.YLvrllrl.pfl/Iv L)c:`I✓i/� c - _ m _ > Z - *r� r7 :[ m ve ,e "1��/Y111r-. ,. _q — — -_i. ' o;17irl. '� fJI" * ---- _......_ fc.cx I- W :�,_ "•T47i re ,, 5e I,/,t:TA��. .'13_x n ,D ° e z e ° /), °`e- . i-1�r-M i/'. I Pz�.' ' I(� F ' O EN ° 'O `II \�/ - _ __-�`` - __ F � Il_`I—1,q•1a:,1�'I- �h I._. _ _. . V Z W 0-21 T ,! } , ' / / Y I W Nr �ISr - 3 ' /;L �u/tfir•-�—— HA•1L.�t_ e:N N.4 E h12E Q jai, \ '_"__�_ �'/ /: '.' p��„� - -- , �� I ¢ Rv.,,,,.� O x k r ' l/ ?Y�. r '"•�` �'�Q') 'O ,'\F A 11 --I:I - y ® .56e{r-uccl+w-Tur..1/JIM�MSW-6 B'aL Nw11•yfGs.11 6{6 0 j Q W I, / , 1�' f \ /, �`�, ��.,�~,�:Y9�r`[ I / -. p Ill r ' fwfwJTap[[1I,ai u�a�a/ol •a'P @ O I- / r' / or IBA*r.,Awrs 1 11['A, i\�\, ,mf �'� I `� r�.IN IKINNIGK Q C Z H �� .+i -1'�.`ll'lii ii III W ILI � � m /: /,11 ./ -.�• .°n ps.'o,Els'.w`a'a ;III 111� id I i title iJEit i 4.4f ikki. h W / S S, %! .'./ / i \ I "1P- C�1 I / 'I 'j' Z Ape[,IA Leo wav iPnG[1Psz.' eoury 1 YI B _ 1 / I 1.' . \ • �° I o. .o'I ,/' .;U.• -. ;.� 1 1,l r hI /: / / �• ' J I `,, ,I 1311.1126 de,. h•u e4.A..[A[,Ne. b'fir er,e, I` �<= _Q IDld�l .... ,M„w.Dl C A 14GN. ` -�f•. �JI Ii _ LI6PA,J IfsG BWGK PNE / .-_._. ` ll I ir'OS'Im[ f� _ �ci-' ` I _ P'(RV u.I.E.Ea-Yr-w..'AayrPoa,.T� I 'GA f 8�61 Hre.r�AGIN 0Wc 4C4eCN J I `-, �' a —I 1'� �D ': 12a-1--. ,._-.'-1_ I I �� POWc•I 1. e.AQ. � }/i ce" I _ ./ \�� .. ,-• v�,r[f� I O�/A:'P,•��- l .r-r .. _` I' /,;,yry6 5oP L3WIJ I „/ I tlI t v V w e:,.�e s II c w - .. I I f;no r.T 4rnu.J� aIy ! h Pr'� .. OIL un .. c no .� "-Or ; i.f `iI CO rWoT[wn sw.95.R1/ ff J. ��\ '.•\ 1$ II I,W� f rfcc R A '31�� '' 3I i+ r I �` .. I _ �, i'��71101 iv'r` ��': `�► "intiti� ,p•wa ot Iw la:9 �, I ,R, !I • - \;. d_ I� ��113111i ,rylhrlig �.i[f .1t1\ ,, , '. 1 _�/��-►-• i+h°. I[ -�'---. L ' 1, . ,:,:.•L ��_4kl:."y--�.' it — j t„� 'i/iil,✓,11(Iflls�il'.01 : 11 ..14C • .1 II j\M ! *. II <� y :S j, I [l,iJ.._1.,.:.-_V .a°Mlei\t°men 4^i•I.ria-... L.�gEq�\A[I[111..V...Li.R.Yyaa Nq[..a•,U•,w�.0•••Mit ... tiv II 1.-_ 5, 4: IBJ+ + •, „i .•III '\ • _ mlrc _ !m. dr t [,_—_--�4rvr n 1 —___—._.. ad°IVA�x jF 1S-0104 v I ;nn "t --- _ - - .D",-e- e -- __ =�_��._ ------..,F.[.E,l<.,reel= .:.- - -- 1 —.. - `.n - '�." m 1 MONROE AVENUE-NE-- —. /W'. -A .V- y4._ "• 13 1, 4-- ‘-WM i Ii kl lb, Z1/ 1 i i 1 i ,.,. t i j 0,— ii �, 4 bail s • a ,-_,.! lir 1 --: \ ILI Q..:]\--;.< \� .•.. p' ,\ Yl qi pi \ ll 11 ):: en rn 1 O i �* ` • aIli il ;El iiiiMEN lkim `4 er i 1 \\ :I 1 IP • are III 3d r d i \\ \�. .�.• i i .<,:k, is z 1 �•e\\ T ■Ici� !I . 7-2.- F . z., 111 Ilk/ - t-i \, / _ o ��„ - 1 \\\\ .. Isom 4... lin ilk I ■� iii / \ if IU\\ °I Fir, Y p.1.A. ---..% ����(1777lI o ` rma I ; o ,3 as? , , Z e O t 1)14 .1.% , 11„ 11 ;- i 1 ; , , ; ; : E. d 3 it an I m! 12. II,' I $A II O©O ©00 . s NI _ 9 ill- my I 'oijiJ P II 3II 4 , _ _IO.1.1..E...► — q.O 4Al%� 15215 72ND AVENUE DOOM .....Jim r For: • Title: B880 ` ENE wA 000J2 __ EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION (200)251-5222 W. and LAKHA INVESTMENTS PRELIMINARY EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS �„ ,'� Y (2oe)I51-57t12 FAx ""— .-.. �--= 11919 NORTH CREEK PKWY SUITE 101 7, io •4' .•..'� °Ap'10"/`m''m °""y U� BOTHELL, WASHINGTON 98011 0 • a " a r'" -e- m ,,`: i;, C• m a I. ikp . 4. 1\..\ ____,-) P: C) L 01 il t ii , _ M / I o a n 'J ',•~,"••.: g ry \\\o ih. a o 0 1,?,S 7-- ',..4,..: „Tr t S OO ' S ew :.li min 1 I p ,,, 3i - se e� f , lil i 01111 :: -.'•::: :',.,:- 31 1—'3- 1 : 9 illiii I .....—........— .:-, : i; ii. 1. OO 1j> o 1 1 .. y k ar \ ' 1 TY \-0 illi Mali% \ j 181 i '.' . \ 1,1 ,c,-----pr,,, ,,,,,,, goor051 1 il. I. . -i „..----1 ptpoll :1 I _F., . : 11 ,,,, ,, „ ...., : . . „ I; \. . ..., ;A, . iP a P . 1 I 1 : . i 1 t 1 �\ 0 ; r m 0 0 0 O© o ,ae Z :II $S11 11. 31 le 0 '" I j%? i ol_q— 0 1 1/, + 1 1 ill asdas o �/ e� 3 81 1 ..— PpF1AV@ 15215 72NO AVENUE SOUTH ""•"o ` For. - Title: 6880 mItfr s KENT.WA Newt — EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION (205)251-5752 _ v.-:•< and LAKHA INVESTMENTS PRELIMINARY EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS/ ... (soe)xs1-e7ez FAX .... �, 11919 NORTH CREEK PKWY SUITE 101 BUILDING SECTION 8 r -- 4% '"""'4°'"o'o""m"'m °" BOTHELL, WASHINGTON 98011 CURRENT PLANNING oivisiorommegnommommungingEm AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 114:1- day of pta, , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Citholyv) Irv:chows documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing °lug t)aefre;‘,Ciecf CovAtitri • irrecver Der-t" cie Lh\c‘k., Li-vem AlskAe.if- ZeiSr FAISIne.viem 1ajcilate-itvawN IDcjg oF r\OlUattl.:-.P .SOLLItem TZttc.k.. iNvsa.e.14.,0fr, - 'Det cf TritunsreT-tatirv% Su.e. --1Z.1/41.11Vle".1 Cal of Searttke-. wuavv¼tsk• kftltan-1-so%Lc. "t2e2c3 VY1a1C...0Vvt ts 'eveslisnu.c1clest,\;:t 1 Kam ti\ TrtL -Tectik. PeAtec_. IRATI" 1bv...1e.r% (Signature of Sender) c5MdJZLIL STATE OF OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 6/4A/DkA i<i signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for jha"•,Us6S and purposes mentioned in the instrument. '71,4 On'bi•nv • Dated: •-tvl Nota ublic in for the State of Wahingfon. 4' •••• Notary(Print) /41q6-11-12-E-- •P ' - My appointment expires: Project Name: CiAeU1437‘ ItArDall-alils or\ 4;44-1 Project Number 05-1 Stsr e--bf NOTARY.DOC CITY }►F RENTON "LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor - Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 18, 1996 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 - Olympia,WA 98504-7703 SUBJECT: Environmental Determinations . Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and'Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee.on April 16,1996: , DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED - • CHEVRON/MCDONALD'S'ON FOURTH • LUA-96-037,SA,ECF The applicantrequests Environmental Review (ECF) for re-development of the subject property with a • Chevron Gas Station and convenience store with a McDonald's quick-serve restaurant. Three new underground fuel storage tanks would also be installed. The proposal also requires Site Plan Review (SA) and is subject to.a public hearing since the adjacent property to the South'is zoned and designated for residential use. Location: 3209 NE 4th Street. • • The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on May 07, 1996. Following the end of the comment and appeal period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. . Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division,. • Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. If you have questions, please call me at 277-6186. . For the Environmental Review Committee, C ). f1174 4e)(444/1"3 Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries. David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Sue Rumery, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Rita Perstac, Puget Power AGNCYLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 60 This paper contains 50%recycled material,25%post consumer " - CITY' ►F RENTON • "LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department • Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 18, 1996 Emerald City Construction c/o Mr. Bruce Creager Barghausen Engineers 18215-72nd Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 SUBJECT: ChevronlMcDonald's on Fourth Project No. LUA-96-037,SA,ECF • Dear Mr. Creager: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on April 16, 1996, decided that your project may be issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: See enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather`than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required 15 day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant)who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The required 14 day appeal period will run concurrently with the comment period. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on • May 07, 1996. • Following the end of the comment and appeal period, the City will finalize its Determination, unless comments received require a reevaluation. • WAC 197-11-660 states that the responsibility for implementation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project, any mitigation measure established by the ERC not directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. Appeal procedures and mitigation measures imposed by.the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. • A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on May 14, 1996 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval (SA): If the. Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at 277-6186. For the Environme. -I Review Committee, 4flrTothLg Proje er cc: C. Lester Alexander&Doris J.Alexander/Owners • A.J. Ladner; Housing Authority-City of Renton/Party of Record DNSMLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 Th;�nnnn,,nnlnfne Fn ronvrinri malcrinl 9F nnef rnnmimor 9 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-037,S ,V,ECF 'I APPLICANT: Emerald City Construction do Baurghausen Engineers (Bruce Creager) PROJECT NAME: Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th Street DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant requests Environmental Review (ECF) for re- development of the subject property with a Chevron Gas Station and convenience store with a McDonald's quick-berve restaurant. Three new underground fuel storage tanks would also be installed. The proposal also requires Site Plan Review (SA) and is subject to a public hearing since the adjacent property to the South is zoned and designated for residential use. 1 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3209 NE 4th Street• • MITIGATION ASURES: 1. The applic t shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new constriction. Credit may be given for the area of the demolished structure. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of the Building Permit. li 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic.Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75 per each new average da''ly trip attributable to the project. Credit may be given for existing trips generated by the curr nt site use that would be eliminated with the proposal. The fee is payable prior to the issuanc of a Building Permit. . 3. The applicant shall limit construction traffic,on the adjacent arterials during pre-loading activities tol'the hours between 8:30 am and 3:30'pm. i II • • MITMEAS.DOC/ •- - 1 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-037,SA,V,ECF APPLICANT: Emerald City Construction do Baurghausen Engineers (Bruce Creager) PROJECT NAME: Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th Street DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant requests Environmental Review (ECF) for re- development of the subject property with a Chevron Gas Station and convenience store with a McDonald's quick-serve restaurant. Three new underground fuel storage tanks would also be installed. The proposal also requires Site Plan Review (SA) and is subject to a public hearing since the adjacent property to the South is zoned and designated for residential use. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3209 NE 4th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General 1. The applicant shall apply with all applicable City, state, federal and other jurisdictional regulations, codes and policies governing the project and site. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate submittals prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, according to City of Renton drafting standards. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000, 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000; and 3%of anything over$200,000. One-half of the fee must be paid upon application • for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the peimits are issued. 3. The applicant is required to obtain a Construction Permit in order to accomplish site work and installation of site improvements. - 4. Construction plans must comply with the City's Drafting Standards. 5. The project requires Site Plan Review. A public hearing before the City's Hearing Examiner will be held following the completion 'of the comment/appeal period for the Environmental Determination. Storm Drainage 6. There is no System Development Charge (SDC) for storm water applicable to the project if storm water runoff is handled via infiltration as noted in the Storm Drainage Report. 7. Storm detention and biofiltration is required on-site per the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 8. Storm drainage facilities are required per the King County Surface Water.Design Manual. Chevron/McDonald' on Fourth LUA-96-037,SA,EC11 Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 2 9. The project site is located within Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection Area which requires that biofiltratio/swales are lined. 10. Existing localized flooding on the site from Monroe Avenue NE shall be addressed by the applicant via the construction of the proposed driveways with a slight berm, per the applicant's Level 1 Drainage Analysis. Wastewater 11. The applicant is required to provide a grease interceptor as part of the kitchen in order to remove fats, oils, and grease. The grease interceptor must be shown on the construction drawings. I 12. The prope is subject to the Special Assessment District (SAD0002) wastewater charge of $3,787.13. The SAD charge is payable at the tune the Construction Permit is issued. 13. The Syste Development Connection charge for this property has already been paid. 14. A connecti n to the sanitary sewer is available in Monroe Avenue NE. Water • - 15. The applicant is responsible for the payment'of a latecomer fee of$3,940.75 for water system developme t. The latecomer fee is payable at the time that the Construction Permit is issued. r o ed_ ro'ect is located in Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. The applicant will be required 16. The p op p � q pp q to meet all applicable sections of the Aquifer Pro n tection Area Ordiance. 17. The availalle fire flow is 5,000 gpm. 18. A backflo prevention device is required for the irrigation system and domestic service. 19. The applicant is required to pay a Water System Development Charge of$6,202.12. Fire ! ' 20. The applicant is required to pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee as discussed in the Impact and Mitigation discussion. The Fire Mitigation Fee is $0.52/square foot of the convenience store/rests rant building, and is estimated to be $2,260.00. The fee is payable at the time the building prmit is issued. Credit maybe given to the new construction for any existing building that is demolished. The applicant will need to coordinate with the Fire Department to determine whether an reduction in the mitigation fee applies to the proposal. . 21. ' The preli ary required fire flow is 2,750 gpm. Three fire hydrants are required; one within 150- feet of the uilding and two within 300 feet of the building. 22. Separate plans and permits are required for underground storage tank installations and kitchen hood fire protection systems. ' Parks and Recrea ion ' 23. The'owne tenant shall maintain landscaped areas outside of the property line but.within the street right-of-ways. ADVNOTES.D oa Chevron/McDonald's on Fourth LUA-96-037,SA,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) • Page 3 Police Services 24. The applicant is advised to coordinate with Renton Police Crime Prevention for recommendations to reduce possibility of theft and vandalism during site and building construction. Building Construction 25. The applicant's soils engineer is required to approve footing excavations prior to the placement of any concrete on the site. Transportation &Street Improvements 26. The City's Transportation Mitigation Fee will apply to the project as discussed in the mitigation measures above. The applicable fee is $75 per each new average daily trip and is estimated to be $43,500.00. Credit may be given for existing trips that the current site use generates which would be eliminated with the proposal. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that the Building Permit is issued. 27. One street light will be required on NE 4th Street,just east of the ingress/egress driveway. This will be a condition of the Site Plan Review/Approval. The applicant will need to submit a revised Site Plan showing the location of the street light prior to the public hearing. 28. The applicant will be required to revise the Site Plan to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division to locate the back edge of the sidewalk at the property line. The minimum width of the sidewalk must be five feet, and the minimum width of the planting strip must be five feet. Revisions to the Site Plan drawings should be made prior to the public hearing. Solid Waste 29. The Site Plan must show the location of garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points. All garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible • to hauling trucks. • ADVNOTES.DOC/ ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION . ' POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: CHEVRONIMCDONALD'S ON FOURTH PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-037,SA,ECF ' The applicant requests Environmental Review(ECF)for re-development of the subject property with a Chevron Gas Station end convenience store with a McDonald's quick-serve restaurant. Three new underground fuel storage Jenks would also be Installed. The proposal also requires Site Plan Review (SA)and Is subject to a public hearing since the adjacent property to the South Is zoned and designated for residential use.Location:3209 NE 4th SI. ' THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. El APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, n YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON MAY 07.1996 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,MAY 07,1996. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL,RENTON, WASHINGTON,ON MAY 14,1996 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE APPROVAL. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED,THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF • THIS'PUBc.LIIrC HEARING. p YrrY yty�a'a, '1 01<FIR I F_.F,�6_>'L.i4-—,T.o,^N'-,4. :r.0(rag . �hy7z.? •1 IIEr.j'1 o 9 ` 1 AIR IIR�':L': ,' j ,I I'11 ('— ci;` 5:115'�j� �TJ6Gn•,,Paah�'411 I i ��lell .. iili ..1 r ` a ' 1 C ^ � , `41 • Gtlj"`d"• t • 1 i ;Q? : _V iiQ .sill L I I( \A Y 'Agri I -, i• dNa ' ia � ti I� , I • \\0 . .. . NO A 1 MN i FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION -,;':Please Include;the'project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification;:,:.. CERTIFICATION I, S&k)d-LI ,4(,L,LI4SUY) , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posteduy me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on Signed: &l,lia/(/1, STATE OF WASHINGTON ) (J ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) • •,,`��;vf,n I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence thati'N��/ � (ti` G�z; signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free a►: voluntar act uses and purposes mentioned in the instrume t. 41, a y � � Dated: q/ /al/%h • jJ.J44 / `�t t../ / li'c%�=r`, a ss f Notary P 4 Illic in a,.l for the State of Wdshi lgton • JCrjr GGL`Notary Tin ) = . J1 . My appointment expires: .4Gl • • NOTARY.DOC ' . .iii(:)..71 r.C!1- 1 - ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: CHEVRON/MCDONALD'S ON FOURTH PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-037,SA,ECF The applicant requests Environmental Review(ECF) for re-development of the subject property with a Chevron Gas Station and convenience store with a McDonald's quick-serve restaurant. Three new underground fuel storage tanks would also be installed. The proposal also requires Site Plan Review (SA)and is subject to a public hearing since the adjacent property to the South is zoned and designated for residential use. Location: 3209 NE 4th St. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. • AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, xxx YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON MAY 07. 1996 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, MAY 07. 1996. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON MAY 14, 1996 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE APPROVAL. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. _ 1 . . ii .�i -�•• j-;-r ` s" •" i I ; r...x.•i I eJ. 11 � j =r•I_ �_t:lir cN �� � • rL ...LJ.l .. > ._, ,.;/.:,44 ,uursnT- -r"r e e l e. • �*.f r'•-•: •; Per! .; !.i `+ :%1 1. is .'la•"?M•.Cla!‘..'"' r : \ ^I III U u \ r ' • (_....' 41. :.h.::-;::e.. ..,),_ .. , il • . kr_-_,„,:ffv-w..-4..,.-ii.:...- ;: ‘,.. 4,,-----------,-- If . b: .. . ,, 1 es\....; ti ;lI. .h r's., I n •I 1 • + 'r I II�--1, , / + / e ��//I��j/ I Ii• i y -•,,•- ........,,_ /I .a 1,0.. .I.,._fe.f r ,J,. / J k1 I. ,\\/\V . sI .-- 1I: ► w L12 ,.. ,--177- i s r Ill 1 h .. • i NOg-TI-1 I FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION =Please:::i lude:a e; ect: �MBE :.; .: nc.:..::...:.:<...... :r9 ....:..:........ R:when>callin:..,€for::..proper.fleswdenttflcatto -:::;•::;:.:::::.:;::.;:..::::; CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-037,SA,t,ECF APPLICANT: Emerald City Construction do Baurghausen Engineers (Bruce Creager) PROJECT NAME: Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th Street DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant requests Environmental Review (ECF) for re-development of the subject property with a Chevron Gas Station and convenience store with a McDonald's quick-serve restaurant. Three new underground fuel storage tanks would also be installed. The proposal also requires Site Plan Review (SA) and is subject to a public hearing since the adjacent property to the South is zoned and designated for residential use. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3209 NE 4th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 p.m. on May 07, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. PUBLICATION DATE: April 22, 1996 DATE OF DECISION: April 16, 1996 SIGNATURES: 10‘ Gregg77�Irr�mer`Rian, Administrator DA E De rrtmdnt of Planning/Building/Public Works P :-.: /0 6- am Chastain, Admini ator D E Community Service Department // 10 , Lee heeler, Fire Chief DA E Ren n Fire Departme DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-037,SA*ECF APPLICANT: Emerald City Construction c/o Baurghausen Engineers (Bruce Creager) PROJECT NAME: Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th Street DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant requests Environmental Review (ECF) for re- development of the subject property with a Chevron Gas Station and convenience store with a McDonald's quick-serve restaurant. Three new underground fuel storage tanks would also be installed. The proposal also requires Site Plan Review (SA) and is subject to a public hearing since the adjacent property to the South is zoned and designated for residential use. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3209 NE 4th Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. Credit may be given for the area of the demolished structure. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of the Building Permit. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. Credit may be given for existing trips generated by the current site use that would be eliminated with the proposal. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. • 3. The applicant shall limit construction traffic on the adjacent arterials during pre-loading activities to the hours between 8:30 am and 3:30 pm. MITMEAS.DOC/ CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-037,SA,m,ECF APPLICANT: Emerald City Construction do Baurghausen Engineers (Bruce Creager) PROJECT NAME: Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th Street DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant requests Environmental Review (ECF) for re- development of the subject property with a Chevron Gas Station and convenience store with a McDonald's quick-serve restaurant. Three new underground fuel storage tanks would also be installed. The proposal also requires Site Plan Review (SA) and is subject to a public hearing since the adjacent property to the South is zoned and designated for residential use. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3209 NE 4th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General 1. The applicant shall apply with all applicable City, state, federal and other jurisdictional regulations,codes and policies governing the project and site. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate submittals prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, according to City of Renton drafting standards. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000, 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000; and 3%of anything over$200,000. One-half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. 3. The applicant is required to obtain a Construction Permit in order to accomplish site work and installation of site improvements. 4. Construction plans must comply with the City's Drafting Standards. 5. The project requires Site Plan Review. A public hearing before the City's Hearing Examiner will be held following the completion of the comment/appeal period for the Environmental Determination. Storm Drainage 6. There is no System Development Charge (SDC) for storm water applicable to the project if storm water runoff is handled via infiltration as noted in the Storm Drainage Report. 7. Storm detention and biofiltration is required on-site per the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 8. Storm drainage facilities are required per the King County Surface Water Design Manual. ' Chevron/McDonald's on Fourth LUA-96-037,SA,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 2 9. The project site is located within Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection Area which requires that biofiltration swales are lined. 10. Existing localized flooding on the site from Monroe Avenue NE shall be addressed by the applicant via the construction of the proposed driveways with a slight berm, per the applicant's Level 1 Drainage Analysis. Wastewater 11. The applicant is required to provide a grease interceptor as part of the kitchen in order to remove fats, oils, and grease. The grease interceptor must be shown on the construction drawings. 12. The property is subject to the Special Assessment District (SAD0002) wastewater charge of $3,787.13. The SAD charge is payable at the time the Construction Permit is issued. 13. The System Development Connection charge for this property has already been paid. 14. A connection to the sanitary sewer is available on Monroe Avenue NE. Water 15. The applicant is responsible for the payment of a latecomer fee of$3,940.75 for water system development. The latecomer fee is payable at the time that the Construction Permit is issued. 16. The proposed project is located in Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. The applicant will be required to meet all applicable sections of the Aquifer Protection Area Ordinance. 17. The available fire flow is 5,000 gpm. 18. A backflow prevention device is required for the irrigation system and domestic service. 19. The applicant is required to pay a Water System Development Charge of$6,202.12. Fire 20. The applicant is required to pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee as discussed in the Impact and Mitigation discussion. The Fire Mitigation Fee is $0.52/square foot of the convenience store/restaurant building, and is estimated to be $2,260.00. The fee is payable at the time the building permit is issued. Credit may be given to the new construction for any existing building that is demolished. The applicant will need to coordinate with the Fire Department to determine whether any reduction in the mitigation fee applies to the proposal. . 21. The preliminary required fire flow is 2,750 gpm. Three fire hydrants are required; one within 150- feet of the building and two within 300 feet of the building. 22. Separate plans and permits are required for underground storage tank installations and kitchen hood fire protection systems. Parks and Recreation 23. The owner/tenant shall maintain landscaped areas outside of the property line but within the street right-of-ways. Police Services ADVNOTES.DOC/ Chevron/McDonald's on Fourth ; . LUA-96-037,SA,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 3 24. The applicant is advised to coordinate with Renton Police Crime Prevention for recommendations to reduce possibility of theft and vandalism during site and building construction. Building Construction 25. The applicant's soils engineer is required to approve footing excavations prior to the placement of any concrete on the site. Transportation &Street Improvements 26. The City's Transportation Mitigation Fee will apply to the project as discussed in the mitigation measures above. The applicable fee is $75 per each new average daily trip and is estimated to be $43,500.00. Credit may be given for existing trips that the current site use generates which would be eliminated with the proposal. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that the Building Permit is issued. 27. One street light will be required on NE 4th Street,just east of the ingress/egress driveway. This will be a condition of the Site Plan Review/Approval. The applicant will need to submit a revised Site Plan showing the location of the street light prior to the public hearing. 28. The applicant will be required to revise the Site Plan to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division to locate the back edge of the sidewalk at the property line. The minimum width of the sidewalk must be five feet, and the minimum width of the planting strip must be five feet. Revisions to the Site Plan drawings should be made prior to the public hearing. Solid Waste 29. The Site Plan must show the location of garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points. All garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. ADVNOTES.DOC/ STAFF City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE April 16, 996 Project Name Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th Street Applicant Emerald City Construction do Baurghausen Engineers (Bruce Creager) File Number LUA-096-037,SA,ECF Project Manager Jennifer Toth Henning Project Description The applicant requests environmental review for redevelopment of a site at NE 4th Street and Monroe Avenue NE. The site is presently occupied by Alexander's Auction Storage. Existing buildings would be demolished to accommodate the new development. The project would consist of a Chevron gas station with a 38-foot by 83- foot pump island canopy with six multi-product dispensers, and a 4,350 square foot convenience store with a McDonald's quick-serve restaurant. The restaurant would feature drive-through window service and interior seating for 52 to 60 persons. The Chevron station and convenience store would operate 24 hours each day, while the McDonald's would be open 16 hours. One driveway on each of NE 4th Street and Monroe Avenue NE would provide full turning movements. A second driveway at the south east corner of the site would provide for exiting only from the site onto Monroe Avenue NE. Three new underground fuel storage tanks with 35,000 to 40,000 gallons of storage capacity would be installed on the site. The tanks and product piping would be of double containment construction. The underground fuel system would include interstitial monitoring for the detection of leaks. Alarms would be activated if any leakage occurred and portions would be shut-down immediately. The site is located in Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection Area. The proposal also requires Site Plan Review and is subject to a public hearing since the adjacent property to the south is zoned and designated for residential uses. Project Location 3209 NE 4th Street Exist. Bldg. Area gsf unknown Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf 4,350 sq. ft. store • 3,154 sf pump island Site Area 1.3 acres Total Building Area gsf 7,540 square feet RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department En 'mental Review Committee Staff Report " Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th LUA-96-037,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFAPRIL 16,1996 Page2 of 6 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF X DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. Credit may be given for the area of the demolished structure. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of the Building Permit. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. Credit may be given for existing trips generated by the current site use that would be eliminated with the proposal. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 3. The applicant shall limit construction traffic on the adjacent arterials during pre-loading activities to the hours between 8:30 am and 3:30 pm. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General 1. The applicant shall apply with all applicable City, state, federal and other jurisdictional regulations, codes and policies governing the project and site. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate submittals prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, according to City of Renton drafting standards. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000, 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000; and 3% of anything over $200,000. One-half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. 3. The applicant is required to obtain a Construction Permit in order to accomplish site work and installation of site improvements. 4. Construction plans must comply with the City's Drafting Standards. ERCRPT.DOC f • City of Renton PB/PW Department En mental Review Committee Staff Report Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th LUA-96-037,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFAPRIL 16,1996 Page3 of 6 5. The project requires Site Plan Review. A public hearing before the City's Hearing Examiner will be held following the completion of the comment/appeal period for the Environmental Determination. Storm Drainage 6. There is no System Development Charge (SDC) for storm water applicable to the project if storm water runoff is handled via infiltration as noted in the Storm Drainage Report. 7. Storm detention and biofiltration is required on-site per the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 8. Storm drainage facilities are required per the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 9. The project site is located within Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection Area which requires that biofiltration swales are lined. 10. Existing localized flooding on the site from Monroe Avenue NE shall be addressed by the applicant via the construction of the proposed driveways with a slight berm, per the applicant's Level 1 Drainage Analysis. Wastewater 11. The applicant is required to provide a grease interceptor as part of the kitchen in order to remove fats, oils, and grease. The grease interceptor must be shown on the construction drawings. 12. The property is subject to the Special Assessment District (SAD0002) wastewater charge of$3,787.13. The SAD charge is payable at the time the Construction Permit is issued. 13. The System Development Connection charge for this property has already been paid. 14. A connection to the sanitary sewer is available on Monroe Avenue NE. Water 15. The applicant is responsible for the payment of a latecomer fee of$3,940.75 for water system development. The latecomer fee is payable at the time that the Construction Permit is issued. 16. The proposed project is located in Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. The applicant will be required to meet all applicable sections of the Aquifer Protection Area Ordinance. 17. The available fire flow is 5,000 gpm. 18. A backflow prevention device is required for the irrigation system and domestic service. 19. The applicant is required to pay a Water System Development Charge of$6,202.12. Fire 20. The applicant is required to pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee as discussed in the Impact and Mitigation discussion. The Fire Mitigation Fee is $0.52/square foot of the convenience store/restaurant building, and is estimated to be $2,260.00. The fee is payable at the time the building permit is issued. Credit may be given to the new construction for any existing building that is demolished. The applicant will need to coordinate with the Fire Department to determine whether any reduction in the mitigation fee applies to the proposal. . 21. The preliminary required fire flow is 2,750 gpm. Three fire hydrants are required; one within 150-feet of the building and two within 300 feet of the building. ERCRPT.DOC • City of Renton PB/PW Department En mental Review Committee Staff Report Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th LUA-96-037,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFAPRIL 16,1996 Page4 of 6 22. Separate plans and permits are required for underground storage tank installations and kitchen hood fire protection systems. Parks and Recreation 23. The owner/tenant shall maintain landscaped areas outside of the property line but within the street right-of- ways. Police Services 24. The applicant is advised to coordinate with Renton Police Crime Prevention for recommendations to reduce possibility of theft and vandalism during site and building construction. Building Construction 25. The applicant's soils engineer is required to approve footing excavations prior to the placement of any concrete on the site. Transportation& Street Improvements 26. The City's Transportation Mitigation Fee will apply to the project as discussed in the mitigation measures above. The applicable fee is $75 per each new average daily trip and is estimated to be$43,500.00. Credit may be given for existing trips that the current site use generates which would be eliminated with the proposal. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that the Building Permit is issued. 27. One street light will be required on NE 4th Street, just east of the ingress/egress driveway. This will be a condition of the Site Plan Review/Approval. The applicant will need to submit a revised Site Plan showing the location of the street light prior to the public hearing. 28. The applicant will be required to revise the Site Plan to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division to locate the back edge of the sidewalk at the property line. The minimum width of the sidewalk must be five feet, and the minimum width of the planting strip must be five feet. Revisions to the Site Plan drawings should be made prior to the public hearing. Solid Waste 29. The Site Plan must show the location of garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points. All garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? 1) Earth Impacts: Construction and site preparation activities filling and grading of approximately 2,000 cubic yards of cut and fill could result in erosion and sedimentation. City Codes require the applicant provide a Construction Mitigation Plan and a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan(TESCP) prior to the issuance of a Construction Permit. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation required. Policy Nexus: N/A ERCRPT.DOC . City of Renton PB/PWDepartment En mental Review Committee Staff Report Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th LUA-96-037,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFAPRIL 16,1996 PageS of 6 2) Air Impacts: Construction activity would result in increased levels of airborne particulate (especially dust) potentially impacting air quality in the area of the project site. Emissions from construction equipment would have a minor impact on local air quality. Construction impacts would be short term in nature and would be regulated through best management practices of the required TESCP. Vehicular emission are regulated by the State of Washington. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation required. Policy Nexus: N/A 3) Fire Protection Impacts: The proposal would add new construction to the City which would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee would apply to all new construction, less the area of demolished structures (as applicable). The fee has been estimated at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. The Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated to be$2,262.00 and is payable at the time that the Building Permit is issued. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. Credit may be given for the area of the demolished structure. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of the Building Permit. Policy Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting Ordinance; SEPA Ordinance. 4) Transportation--New Traffic Impacts The proposal would result in increased vehicular trips that would impact the City's road system. Any new trips would be subject to the City's Traffic Mitigation Fee. This fee is assessed at a rate of$75 per each new average daily trip and is payable prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. The fee is estimated to be $43,500.00 based on 580 new trips at$75 per each trip. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of $75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. Credit may be given for existing trips generated by the current site use that would be eliminated with the proposal. The fee is payable prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. Policy Nexus Traffic Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting Ordinance; SEPA Ordinance. 5) Transportation — Construction Trips Impacts: Site construction would require between 1,500 and 2,000 cubic yards of fill material. Grading would raise site elevations and excavation would be accomplished to allow for the installation of gasoline storage tanks. Truck trips would increase on the surrounding arterials as fill material is delivered to or excavated material removed from the site. This would result in added congestion on local roads during the AM and PM peak traffic flows. No construction related traffic should be permitted during pre-loading activities except between the hours of 8:30 am and 3:30 pm. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall limit construction traffic on the adjacent arterials during pre-loading activities to the hours between 8:30 am and 3:30 pm. Policy Nexus: SEPA Ordinance ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department En mental Review Committee Staff Report Chevron/McDonald's on NE 4th LUA-96-037,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFAPRIL 16,1996 Page6 of 6 E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. _X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report.. ERCRPT.DOC —g . —8 —8 • i =. I :,I. _',:: ,b, ,` - ?i :yam; 7., , ..... al '.i..,:;:r:....,'N, :'",",reiY,,.)144): )\' 1,ff.<._.t_-) .-ts.\,,:',,,!;,N r ai.. ' a ''• `,,4lr. .C\- /N. t' • ''- e"„_,. t: „ 'i-.t -. P\- 1i \ \\ • si M1w • �"• '/ ' 4 Z9! \• a E .. '', \ iit.:�.' F 10• •. 3i ° �/ 1 \ ^ p ' 7 \ `: ififi / ., L. , switititi..,_ii.4,,,Ft 0.,:',.‘, CO ' -,10 a: I I a7 `des 'I'� .,.�` \Y O : - ....._. a .,.[rr-z�. _.i T,�. c3r� I i rs;i.r[�7v. — m I_o: r. n 00 .,:; „ D. — — : --a.>rv\'. •: ®,e 1 _._,.:_______ ! // HI '.:‘,::::,„.r.i:i__.s.......:,..:-.1"-Ili 11:,,,,,,, oOo Os4e \ vs- € , I(EE(�''; :` 1 t_' I. -.. 3_ 1.\ ' Y 9 - 1 4 I , —�,` ,,L r} v, : r- �I I - I • .,I,.,,,.I.Ir•,I.,..I .•..a. '��._... Q,GHAu 1821$7250 AVENUE SOV,H '�'a'° TNe, 5660 �Pfj�_t�Z RENT,WI 98032 a EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION CHEVRON WfihI OSR (206)251-6222 AND LAKHA INVESTMENTS NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP (206)251-8782 Fax ►5 CIVIL Ex.iM1ECNiNc.LAND xo onv "-' 19119 NORTH CREEK PKWY SUITE 101 SWC NE 4th AND MONROE ST.NE xx u [m q..EMna071111 SERVICESx BOTHELL WA 98011 RENTON,WA VL• 3 II III'' PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN �.:z"".A 1 ��IL VOCO CO Lij BITE T-20' Ierr«I CL CL X a z hq 4'.. • a W • E7 -.. CNTTY MAP a Q „���, ` IFC3AL DESCRIPTION fi r o w — °� of No .", 1P• ,.1w orth,�xf ".�.s . Z.._, .�`� ._ --- - ull; __-. -- ----- 1n.....oxoxxc,nsu.n.R.w...nm.,a Sams r PA4 MG \ Pr...,s,.P� '/I o.•oo•c zea ao• _..__.. ./1 .. v,..6 II I _ ._. 9"sn.n �wrc' ow,.x.PanZW0H ut r. 1-ice" �� s, ' , .. ., 6.0 P. te,.. o �' n CD xl :o v I'I,�9�1 _.• c ^- . 1 • .: I ,o .o... .1�na, p Z >- I2 Salon1 CCz 0 �'1 i' m"'siP.n'd,i �„�.Icaw,l ¢ W 3 p __xs xx Is ,e lc k' Is a 11 f s s s x 7 sms.1 1-- Y ' { �, „, SfTE DATA o... Z W a z a.,S v 5 ., i �` y n.i F I aaa.a r�r Campy-x,w v. } Z rZ 4 x, I S'11ro1 . . .+ W iiO.- �°s i.f,"v. _:P.lu) PROPOSED r —, v i • x.s�_F �� laxs = _. _ you Incwmry IL } I- ?r.In.. ra + \.1�..w, 0 < f" J xs / • « ' � I' ®, i ®� • III �.a t� .r �;_.,al ,u"/:f. u ¢ Z I- „ i ,I., I• z ! P.,:�waw.,r.xx n .•,.1./I camp. 9x pm .. S F I ' I I , III 80.91.9< .»..,: 5v P. - 29 v I,,,L,, INCH& ]] 310xE F'I' '"OE�Yv''I.C'Ip,Ci \ - it Propeak 9 L I - 9a'SS.uAk n#�'. Pg. ICI Oaf"A�mlc "..m.n 11.w* 's .0 Stn.,: from s [x j .b �///J ,l. ` • I IS'NGM W • , C...T S. .' uonu '� 3 C-.,max I I /� 16 1a15 -�I ,'.p J -s,' "I I .m I • IA.b.I:,,.�v. pp� : / . Oa 1511 c,0 1 — • 1 ��, h NOTES g € Jx I PHASE IIB //I ' roe n n wnsnPx ie � II E.44..2 u.00.ncu'111.1926.e m e>.n....,�w^,x WM...K,..�.as,...va^k.+.n. • a,u1.c v r �q�5y5yi �FiP.cx I \®�U�/ \,:. .1l; n"i il'.i LEGEND ...I,•o. ,r._, 34 . s.f W Men • i - -— SI ,,. SR.OR.. wos°oamus�, ''I. _ -.._-p::. ... ,. .. urcA W. Jei b, II .2r.r 2 PL4,t,,, eaoq�— _ ��`% AA _:: ooslwc..xw _ .. .. .... i - • • • t — — __. _. _ ._ _. »3 / x n%-cowm,.. `,n.a• .v. S COW sm sc m =i - ' Qorm ��„�° � — — `I` ) Pam € �,,••, =< Cp5',M'1 u' ms1 0.10D PM. -----PI I - ri • „-1,- AVENUE NE- -- --,.m�w.n...-PuacA_p:=_- MONROE --- ,,.,.,, C-._.. -1 m —PAT TELEPHONES,,,,.-, -a„,o- --- 4;_, A.,lu � P we I• I = ,b A _ „.,xP i .a bb V .4 6160'+m.,-.o3,16/uvs.6]l s.w 1.20 3,eli",,....n nnw-snow-rnsw-". p ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW,COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE APRIL'16, 1996 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Sam Chastain, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jim Hanson & Mike Kattermann Meeting Date Tues , April 16,' 1996 Time: < 9:00 Location: Third Floor Conference Room Agenda listed below. R&D Facility/SW 16th Technical Center(New) (Henning/6186) LUA-96-034,SA,SM,ECF The applicant proposes to develop a new one-story structure (Building A) and an addition to an existing structure (Building B) on a partially developed 22-acre site. Building A would be 129,000 sq. ft. in size, while Building B would result in the addition of 202,000 square feet. to an existing 85,000 sq. ft. building. A total of 618 parking spaces would serve the site. These would be speculative buildings, with office, and high-tech manufacturing uses anticipated. Three wetlands are present on the site. Three wetlands are present on the site. Two small wetlands are not regulated and would be filled. A third wetland (approximately 16,000 square feet) is subject to the requirements of the Wetlands Management Ordinance. The site is located adjacent to Springbrook Creek, although no development is proposed within 25 feet of the mean high water mark. The project requires Environmental Review, Site Plan Approval, and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Location: 801 SW 16th Street. Chevron/McDonalds on Fourth (New) (Henning/6186) LUA-96-037,SA,V,ECF The applicant requests Environmental Review (ECF) for redevelopment of the subject property with a Chevron Gas Station and convenience store with a McDonald's quick-serve restaurant. Three new underground fuel storage tanks would also be installed. The proposal also requires Site Plan Review and is subject to a public hearing since the adjacent property to the south is zoned and designated for residential use. Location: 3209 NE 4th Street (at Monroe Ave NE). Arterial Commercial(CA) Zone Code Amendments (New) (Cohen/5578) LUA-96-044,ECF Code Amendment to allow bus, truck and recreational vehicle sales as a secondary use in the CA zone. Repairs of these vehicles would be allowed as an accessory use to sales. Location: South of SW Grady Way and West of SR 167 and Rainier Avenue South. Interim Transit Hub (Discussion) (Pywel1/5586)) LUA-96-025,ECF Review comments received. cc: J.Covington, Executive Assistant to the Mayor L.Warren,City Attorney (R) F.Kaufman,Hearing Examiner S.Carlson, Economic Development Director(R) J.Gray,Fire Prevention A.Larson,Fire Prevention(R) P.Pierce,P/B/PW Admin. I G.�. © O � • ;:.�-{••<ii•{y ?: ':+.i:�ii.:�{•::i:::i{4i i: •:•::::i':i:9i'rii::{+'ji}::L^:;:;ii`}iiiiiii::�>': {•i'•i:{.::^:4:{4:h:{�:4i:':•+:?:•i:•:Yv;{.v;{{.•r{{Jv:.:. :. ...••. •::: :•:w:v•.�:•::.:x:.�::......::• -�.:�::.:::i{::.4:...•....:.::.:.. Project Name (a'�Dil-- 7 !'11C.Th rube t g!f f Yfh hh e Project Address 3 2_0 9 N E 4 )Yz•< - • Doers Contact Person {"e r ,4 f ex c4 e Y' Address 1 ?a 5E, e-e- .•L1-7 Ai" 2i d kr u1/ Phone Number !_�a►- T�aJs�-, ���rLi) ee-r5 / vice Creaer 02v6)2-51 -4Z2 Permit Number //�� �� Project Description `•""'t-''" .1 G a ale..5 /0 G -5-to Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: ❑ Residential ❑ ITE Trip Generation Manual etail @Traffic Study ❑ Non-retail 0 Other • Calculation: 8 _ L 3 A bG' 5 Transportation Mitigation Fee: # f`3> 6D©' n� Calculated by: /0.4-32 Date: 4'r-'l Account Number: iD 5/5gq. 318.70. 00. 16 Z Date of Payment City of__.Ion Department of Planning/Building/Publ ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:"TwAupY 6M COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 9, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-037,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 02, 1996 APPLICANT: EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER: 'JENNIFER TCrp'an_ON C/O BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERS I CIF11°P PROJECT TITLE: CHEVRON/McDONALDS ON FOURTH WORK ORDER NO: 78073 LOCATION: 3209 NE 4TH STREET APR 5 3 ij96 SITE AREA: 1.3 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 7,5043M.VPIeNIU iji vl6ioN SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT REQUESTS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(ECF)AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA) FOR RE-DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH A CHEVRON GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE, WITH A QUICK SERVE RESTAURANT. THREE NEW UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS WOULD ALSO BE INSTALLED. THE PROPOSAL REQUIRES SETBACK VARIANCES(V)FOR THE PUMP ISLAND AND CONVENIENCE STORE, AS THEY WOULD EXCEED THE MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK ALLOWED. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing LAir _ Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation E. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info ation is nee ed to properly assess this proposal. 2-7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 7 76 DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES EIS REVIEW COMMENTS CHEVRON/QSR 3209 NE 4th St. By Clinton Morgan 277-6216 TRANSPORTATION: 1. Transportation mitigation fee is $43,500.00 to be paid at time the building permit is issued. 2. Back edge of sidewalk to be located at the property line. The minimum width of sidewalk is 5 feet and a minimum planter strip of 5 feet. 3. One Street light require on NE 4th St. Just east of driveway. 96CM078 /7/ / 8-1/n » e- • 7ex = 43JS�6 96CM078.DOC/ City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: t Sou,tuns COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 9, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-037,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 02, 1996 APPLICANT: EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING CIO BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERS Cmi'nr r ,rnrroN PROJECT TITLE: CHEVRON/McDONALDS ON FOURTH WORK ORDER NO: 78073 LOCATION: 3209 NE 4TH STREET APR 0 3 tt qs SITE AREA: 1.3 ACRES .I BUILDING AREA.(gross): 7,5Qg.SQ.ET���G SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT REQUESTS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(ECF)AND SITE PLAID APPROVAL (SA)FOR RE-DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH A CHEVRON GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE, WITH A QUICK SERVE RESTAURANT. THREE NEW UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS WOULD ALSO BE INSTALLED. THE PROPOSAL REQUIRES SETBACK VARIANCES(V)FOR THE PUMP ISLAND AND CONVENIENCE STORE, AS THEY WOULD EXCEED THE MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK ALLOWED. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment .Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary — Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation _ Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation • • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS \\RR II�L_) C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS d 0 I L5 /• 0 6:iri JQ W K= MO r(LCc� oviiiu kXCo006 Ma, -Co Pukedfir DP 1 ( DiCR1,iWe •- : r, sewed this a••/,aeon with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas w • 4• •n�; f• a•• s%eede• to properly assess this proposal. 1/446t Sig,- re o •.ector or Authorized Representative Date D APP.DOC Rev.10/93 • City c:,-,wnton Department of Planning/Building/Pu,. ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'P COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 9, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-037,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 02, 1996 APPLICANT: EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING C/O BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERS PROJECT TITLE: CHEVRON/McDONALDS ON FOURTH WORK ORDER NO: 78073 LOCATION: 3209 NE 4TH STREET SITE AREA: 1.3 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 7,504 SQ.FT. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT REQUESTS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(ECF)AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA)FOR RE-DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH A CHEVRON GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE, WITH A QUICK SERVE RESTAURANT. THREE NEW UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS WOULD ALSO BE INSTALLED. THE PROPOSAL REQUIRES SETBACK VARIANCES(V)FOR THE PUMP ISLAND AND CONVENIENCE STORE, AS THEY WOULD EXCEED THE MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK ALLOWED. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major .Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HlstorldCultural Natural Resources Preservation B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ,t 2;r7 �4 L -/ g 4 acrid 77 2/)-Al C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 171M ignature of Direc orAuthorized Representative Da DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City er,wnton Department of Planning/Building/PUumc"Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'lam \?e lteu — WalcpommENTs DUE: APRIL 9, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-037,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 02, 1996 APPLICANT: EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING C/O BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERS PROJECT TITLE: CHEVRON/McDONALDS ON FOURTH WORK ORDER NO: 78073 LOCATION: 3209 NE 4TH STREET SITE AREA: 1.3 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 7,504 SQ.FT. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT REQUESTS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(ECF)AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA) FOR RE-DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH A CHEVRON GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE, WITH A QUICK SERVE RESTAURANT. THREE NEW UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS WOULD ALSO BE INSTALLED. THE PROPOSAL REQUIRES SETBACK VARIANCES(V) FOR THE PUMP ISLAND AND CONVENIENCE STORE, AS THEY WOULD EXCEED THE MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK ALLOWED. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water 1� Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representativ Date / / DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 tea. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES EIS REVIEW COMMENTS CHEVRON/QSR 3209 NE 4th St. By Clinton Morgan 277-6216 WATER: 1. Latecomer Agreement(pvt)for water is$3,940.75. 2. System Development Charge for water is$6,202.12. 3. Preliminary required fire flow required per Fire Department is 2,750 gpm. Available fire flow is 5,000 gpm. One fire hydrant required for each 1000 gallon of required fire flow. 4. The primary hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building, but not closer than 50 feet and the secondary hydrants must be within 300 feet of the building. 5. A back flow prevention device is required for irrigation system and domestic service. 6. The development is located in Aquifer Protection area zone#2. A special code provision for lining of the bioswale must be followed. 7 Project drawings to follow City of Renton drafting standards. 96CM077 96CM077.DOC/ City orrienton Department of Planning/Building/Puonc Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: prevemll COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 9, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-037,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 02, 1996 APPLICANT: EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOOT 13 EN�NIIN�G��-re C/O BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERS friE rir1IC PROJECT TITLE: CHEVRON/McDONALDS ON FOURTH WORK ORDER NO: 78073 LOCATION: 3209 NE 4TH STREET APR. �• SITE AREA: 1.3 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 7,504 SQ)n&� '/ SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT REQUESTS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(ECF)AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA)FOR RE-DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH A CHEVRON GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE, WITH A QUICK SERVE RESTAURANT. THREE NEW UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS WOULD ALSO BE INSTALLED. THE PROPOSAL REQUIRES.SETBACK VARIANCES(V)FOR THE PUMP ISLAND AND CONVENIENCE STORE, AS THEY WOULD EXCEED THE MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK ALLOWED. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More. Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics _Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation hi d Mr' 1Ai(3itt - d • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS �- ce 4IIacA.� CofnrnC fit We • • • have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional in ormation Is nee-- to properly assess this proposal. 4/.4110 4/V?6, Signature• ector or Authorized Repr=_•ntative Date DEVAPP.DO Rev.10/93 4 , CITY OF RENTON 41�'NTC� MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1996 TO: Jennifer Henning - Senior Planner FROM: Jim Gray - Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Chevron QSR - Northeast 4th Street and Monroe Avenue Northeast The following represent the Fire Department comments associated with the above- subject matter: 1. Preliminary required fire flow is 2,750 gpm. Three fire hydrants are required; one within 150-feet of the building and two within 300-feet of the building. 2. The Fire Mitigation Fee is $.052 per square foot for the building = 4,350 x $.052 = $2,262.00. This fee is due at the time the building permit is issued. Credit may be given to the new construction for any existing building that is demolished. Provide the Fire Department with the square footage for the existing building 3. Separate plans and permits are required for underground storage tank installations and kitchen hood fire protection systems. Contact me if you have any further questions. • C 1)wt- City ar Renton Department of Planning/Building/Pu_...;'Norks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW. SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ?‘eI WCt.O OMMENTS DUE: APRIL 9, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-037,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED:. APRIL 02, 1996 APPLICANT: EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TO y`, ON C/O BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERS PROJECT TITLE: CHEVRON/McDONALDS ON FOURTH WORK ORDER NO: 78073 APR 0 3 1996 LOCATION: 3209 NE 4TH STREET SITE AREA: 1.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA(gross): 7,504 SQ.FT. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT REQUESTS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(ECF)AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA)FOR RE-DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH A CHEVRON GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE, WITH A QUICK SERVE RESTAURANT. THREE NEW UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS WOULD ALSO BE INSTALLED. THE PROPOSAL REQUIRES SETBACK VARIANCES(V)FOR THE PUMP ISLAND AND CONVENIENCE STORE, AS THEY WOULD EXCEED THE MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK ALLOWED. • A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing • Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities 1/ Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • s.e a c h vv\ck We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inf rmation is needed to assess this proposal. Ck" Signature of DirectoFor Authorized Represents a • Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES EIS REVIEW COMMENTS CHEVRON/QSR 3209 NE 4th St. By Clinton Morgan 277-6216 WASTEWATER: 1. Property subject to The Special Assessment District(SAD0002)wastewater charge of$3,787.13. The system connection fee has been paid. 2. The Kitchen will require a grease interceptor per the pluming code and needs to be shown on the plans. 3. The sewer connection is available on Monroe Ave.N.E. STORM: (Surface Water) 1. Storm drainage facilities require per the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 2. Storm detention and biofiltration require on per King County Surface Water design Manual. 3. There will be no storm system connection charge if the storm water runoff is via infiltration as noted in the Storm Drainage Report Analysis. 96CM075 WO#78073 • City or Kenton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL. & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p4(c.' COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 9, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-037,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 02, 1996 APPLICANT: EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING C/O BARGHAUSEN ENGINEERS PROJECT TITLE: CHEVRON/McDONALDS ON FOURTH WORK ORDER NO: 78073 LOCATION: 3209 NE 4TH STREET SITE AREA: 1.3 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 7,504 SQ.FT. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT REQUESTS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(ECF)AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA) FOR RE-DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH A CHEVRON GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE, WITH A QUICK SERVE RESTAURANT. THREE NEW UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS WOULD ALSO BE INSTALLED. THE PROPOSAL REQUIRES SETBACK VARIANCES(V)FOR THE PUMP ISLAND AND CONVENIENCE STORE, AS THEY WOULD EXCEED THE MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK ALLOWED. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals • Transportation Environmental Health • Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation - ag col i c e colts ( service, es-fim a,O aL a ni)uail y ku 4c o() calLs/ OIL proper L OCfua.( C'.cuis td Il n1ati-) �u )ernol.. rn s on .-) of 31- ; rl catiLLh ��- {er11L Cain.o such as Wh e-3 t c i9U Id" iinaM i Gc lS an . ma irMaA nod to lock CL 9 whinB. n /c U 7r)clucli all 11;ol - ie-eccorn62d seer tg 101-7 � - z_ece/Dfairld ad(ito 6L. orf ce7c-6 to rc uls W.1 - si - Ot((Vr° -(E,� Q I(,C_,Dm s W i.((1ot , 1)2(d tej1 p s .rk . 1&f Oat (P - atu4 V?) '/2rCaqh - -hrCAc ltoo reCCoY nc a cross-LL L11 1 pa io Qa # G. COMMEN�'S 14�g s ce /3 y o (lu_ (5).60e 01(c ii 1; r l Conn e-c t w 'h &- avqcsied 3)1)0 Fend C7L W S , pecAsfy S Who ext i- refit vc gv '11) i( We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. LetiON Signature of Director Aut razed Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 FIG. 1 PROPOSED SffE PLAN • NE 4th Street N-0.ORNE,IAY 175'- IJL?tK P b 1 /f I SIGN t40S.f. MAX. FACE 2 15' HIGH 3 I § I I I 4 I. 76' IS-U .� r a 1 all 2 11 0 @ i ®—r 1 GtA . 6 I ° 38'XB3' 1 I I 1 6 AI CANOPY ;,� I °© ®'� d AIR/WATER DISPENSER xk PARKING6 I I 0=� O 0—1 15K -® I PAY TELEPHONES L_ %' .*V I ` L. 1 !%IQII tr SIGN. To 1405J. MAX. FACE / ,5' HIGH 12 I 0 liIilII 0 1 13 V IL mil.14 I /�� R P / 0 ® I}I A Z a1 0 35 36 37 38 •\` 39 C 0 m 15U / \ c \_ _ C0/ C is. 1ST 20'-?I II J� 28 ,7 / ,a _. C- � 3'� ` li .ir PROPOSED Guy-. [F KfCHN DINING L 1511 l �0 :cilieS2- POLE LOCATION . PHASE IIB f/ III /**f/` l_- rr 20 ram' ((�` ilk; 21 - / 22 ,---. F. '..e \ \ - 1149 1.4 3° %%SS -"Jr 8 / + 24 25 26 27 -_ P%1=19600' -16 X 16/ TRASH ENCLOSURE / TITLE: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN: / CHEVRON W/C-STORE & QSR -- FOR: EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION 19119 NORTH CREEK PARKWAY SUITE 101 CTf1TLJCI 1 WA f1Gn11 4.�'t;A vs CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING,SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES March 28, 1996 ti y ®EVELOPMFmT p►�Atrvrnrn e- 4ING ENG0fr APR 0 I1 1996 Ms. Jennifer Henning ���� City of Renton lY ED Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: The Chevron/QSR at the SWC N.E. 4th Street and Monroe Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington Our Job No. 5660 Dear Ms. Henning: As requested, I am writing with additional information for the above-referenced Chevron/QSR project. At this time, there is no significant vegetation on site that could be removed. Therefore, no-clearing/tree removal plan was prepared for the site plan review and variance applications. Also, as requested, I am writing to provide eleven copies of a revised site plan, showing on-site illumination. The luminaries are expected to be 16 feet in height, with 400 watt halogen lamps, and are of a "shoebox" type design which minimizes the back throw of light and, therefore, minimizes spillover illumination onto adjacent properties. Should there be any further information that you need to complete your review of this project, please do not hesitate to contact me at this office. Sincerely, Bruce K. Creager, AIf Senior Planner BKC/es 5660C.011 enc: As Noted cc: Mr. Andy Lakha, Emerald City Construction Mr. Randy Welch, Emerald City Construction Mr. Daniel B. Goalwin, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mr. Jay S. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT,WA 98032 (206)251-6222 (206)251-8782 FAX is�:Fi?i:;:j;!ii'Giiii:?$i.•'�i}ijj;{iviiiii$}}$>:: • .......... :::::.........:.n:;......: {,..........vv:::::•::.:.........:::•}}'•.{S};}•.}•n}}:::•.�::.�::•:::•. .:.{y.v3:::•..:::.�:•r...r f•:::::w::n.::...........}w:::::.-...::::rw:. n.....xr::.•::::v:{:•:}: ? :::?::?::....r...n......n..........,r.....:..�.....n..............n..., .n::r::n:{•::.:p?:-::.}??.::::.::f}:r.; {.{:{}i::;:}}:j•.••:;`.{;:?:.};•.{:?+{L•:i{{•}:ti::}; :::,.:. :a n r : :i:r w: r:}::::.:::::: :}:!?:::::w:::::::}.?:..:._::::4.i. .r}:•:;:;.:n}::n .}....:.. f:r- :< ..:.^?::vw'vw};}•::..y....:.r....:.:::.•r..yx::i:..v.....:.vv:..r -.. ::.. ., fr.. EliiiiSTIORISURROUNDINGaRRORERTY11.0WNERSiiiin .:r.:::::n�:..............r..'f.4i}iii}}}}}:4'r:•r v}:ti!!i}}}}}}}:....y....... .. .. ..::.:::::.�::::::::.................:.n:::::::v:..-....::•::::::... eg ?}?? Y :.......................:........................... hir►.3.OQ;#e. t.o#.the'. . • ::::: :................r..:.......:................ .... ... . ..sub ect:'s PROJECT NAME: Chevron Gas Station with Convenience Store & Quick Serve Restaurant at SWC of NE 4th & Monroe Avenue APPLICATION NO: 9 to —03-1 , 5 R . v, a.ro -The following is a list of property.owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these•individuals of the proposed development. • NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER .' State's Board for Community P.O. Box 42495 722780-0500 i and (Renton Voc-Tech) •• Olympia, WA 98504 - _I. . I Roy Brown's Auto Service 414 Monroe Avenue N.E. - • 092305-9171 Renton,'WA 98056 • • Housing Authority 970 Harrington Avenue N.E. 092305-9051 '• . Renton, WA 98056 : : ' ,Dennis Obermeier, Trustee 14408 S.E. Maple Valley Road 162305-9112 Renton, WA 98059 • U-Haul Real Estate Company P.O. Box 29046 162305-9058 . '- - . • . .. . Phoenix; AZ 850.38 • ..,E.ti'o r Algar l�.. • t'.--' 'bl i 0- Sw,A Halle Von Vougtlander • • 14631:North"Scottsdale Road ,`•1.62�a05-90.5'2.,"',.-• . Scottsdale, AZ 85254 �' La Pianta LP P.O. Box 88050 ',.•'. 1,6230 9' �905 ' ': Tukwila, WA 98188 Greenwood Memorial Park P.O. Box 130540 ' - •1762,406t6691:?w. Houston TX 77219 '( et;,J;s ', c'' s, �r411.1l17i/;j,,JJ • ,. :-0:✓ . r'N •:f, • (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) • a:.. . .. • . : ,. ,- (Continued): .; NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER• • • • Applicant Certification • 1, Barbara Holden , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print.Name) owners and their ddresses were obtained from: '❑ City of Renton Technical Services Records ,f Title Company Records At King County Assessors Records Signed • Date 3/1b1/0 . (Applicant) iv, �♦��ti a (�,f e• NOTARY ♦ ,�q�u�+gyp. ATTSS ‘s °ri,d sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Wash2 � ton, reseincee T ` �J�' on the/�t�i day of �JZ�/ - , 19 S y Si • g "a le •.y.�� 44^ �.�,t ary Public) . P �ERT F1.CA. A LIN • • I.::::. iw,• .:: + .:;' ..:.oreP. :C.e !.:.:.that.: .0troeS.:of...:thy;:P...ropo$: d;:Epplrcato.:::;:..::.:::: ::.::.::::.::.:::xQ:.;:: ;:.;:• :::opt .Eta Ia.ee...........................:.............................::::::::::::•::::::::::::::::..�::::::::.�:.::::.:::._:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;......... . ..,.. .. ..:.:.:.:.................. ..............:..........................:................. ::n::::::::v'r.:::: ..•.••.::::-'vY-iiiii:u'ibiii}:.r:i..::iivjjj;:j;:y;{:{:j;:;:jy;:j:{:::i:iiiiiiiii:�::ii:?;iiiiii:�nLiii?iii.`Lii:?+Ji iiiiiiiiv}::',: :'tiii}iii:•iii•:v. ::::'^i'3i' ?•i d:•• tr:?L:i. :•::w:::::::: ii:•i::?:....{::•�:::?:::::::..: vi?iiiY•:i�is� �i�: ...:......... ........... -ii:�•ii4:h:4 . I/ 4iii}- - ••:v:::... •. :.::::::::::::::::::::.iii:•:vii:ii'-iTi;} �.:::::::::Oii;ii:- ::.i:4:G' A.-::::r:i:�`.ii:\:::4�i::•-..........:.. )..:::•.w:.:�:::::•: '1 ne':.:.:.;;•:. ':.... tl�.: :<;::.:- ...:......::•.�;�t�.«<.;::.:<:.;:;<.:;.;;:;.:.:::;.;::.;:.;:.>::;:.:;�:atel.::::::'�".�::.. :::: •:::::.::::;•v:::•\4J:,•y�::ni;i'i?i}i}iiiiii�iiii»ii:4:•:?iTi}i%: v:-iii:Cii:<_Tii?•i:<.i•�:i::•i:hii'?�iriii:�}ii:?•iii:{i}i:??G:?fii:?LiiTii:{4ii:Gi.�i}/:•::-•::::-::::::�-.�-:�::. ::w.....................................................................................:.................::.. !:}i 4i:ny:}�?•: ?•i:?•:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::.�::::::..::::.0.::::::::.iiiii`:'r:::.::::::x:.�:::::::: ................:....:....:.::.::::::::: ...........:..:::.::..:.:::::::::.:..:..:.:.�..............................................................................�::.:::::::..�::.�...:..::..:::.�::::::::.�:::::.::�:::::::::::.:ter.?•::a:-:�:?.x:::':::�.tj...::f:::.::::.:::.:::::::.:.:�:.: f Sl.fined....:. :,.....,.. .�,#',,:..i. *. . .: ... .......lislprop.doc �� /�_ g/g / ! y _ &/ � REV 07/95 `� � �K� �� / . 2 NOTICE OF ' NOPOSED SITE APPROVAL A?PLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Approval (SA), Variance (V) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: CHEVRON/McDONALDS ON FOURTH/LUA-96-037,SA,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests Environmental Review (ECF) and Site Plan Approval (SA) for re-development of the subject property with a Chevron Gas Station and convenience store, with a quick serve restaurant. Three new underground fuel storage tanks would also be installed. The proposal requires setback Variances (V)for the pump island and convenience store, as they would exceed the maximum building setback allowed. GENERAL LOCATION: 3209 NE 4th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Variance Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. .�'��✓ � .�-` .i' ) Crl� f�' f ,I////JJ����/ {ii Hill„ ii.•��ili.iriiiC�` •`�� � �51 `" S i rv' f �' . ?I' :l :, ��»"1•V-i'I rI,_iiL>J •2',�l .t.l. !_-...-i'I-1.+:�•,�,I - :, , r + 1 �.a - , IF.r _�tgN,..,IE � �y�}�(!��j{'���1 .����� �r�I�.Iy'ir� 1.7J��.'�..1'l I o t�r- � •-.' )4 G 1•.,I \ '1\, 'I I I~\4'M�yht/yT,l� •;, °F,.,.e", ,74,,z'.K' i)iicr i i i I ,, r6,1 , :I fLI' I sad• ,s1,./4I 4, \ • ' 1 71 Y ' l .+' s�'�r 'f, 'd,\e•%F.•,.f.,. '.0, I i 7� ( ..�.. _.�`I , :I I ii J w4JJ.� _ 77 I Y '; "..j.":F14T.::.LI: "L.."'-;,-i;....; 7'. 1' .(''4 ii i I� 1r I. .�•- .•� , I I.I .,�, a.y .� i b „a.,r �,_l,I�._ I t r�; N1-• I ' ca. 1 °•e•`, r I c 11.1 • ' i'l - 4 1 1#1 • . -- I , ,, --- \ /7 R.... ; • , / • I I.T I .,''. V ' I j ® \ 0 ? it T i it NORTH I _ I GENMALOT.DOC o • PENDING APPLICATION : ' PROJECT NAMEINUMBER: CHEVRON/MCDONALDS ON FOURTHILUA-96.037,SA.V,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests Environmental Review(ECF)and Site Plan Approval (SA)for re-development of the subject property with a Chevron Gas Station and convenience store,with a quick serve restaurant.Three new underground fuel storage tanks would also be installed.The proposal requires setback Variances (V)for the pump island and convenience store,as they would exceed the maximum building setback allowed. • GENERAL LOCATION: 3209 NE 4TH STREET PUBLIC APPROVALS: • _Building Permit _Preliminary Plat _Short Plat Conditional Use Permit _Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval ' 'XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Uso XXXX VARIANCE -Permit • Fill&Grade Permit _Shoreline Substantial _Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any lime prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings,or prior to en administrative site plan approval.Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's'Notice of Application'publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application,or If • you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations,appeal periods andler the public hearing date(s)for this project,please contact the Development Services Division at 235.2550. ' r 1 ">411 'ij-r. I p_ :Ir` Ill I fig I ilv.�atIR:a.n� :..1:..•..t.y; rr�r1''��U` l�'iI l' N s k^ L-Ire' i!�� . NTIO1:-Pifif;!L'4 As' 1 '14 ' • tie)11 ..''.=ip..i.;% ..t.,,e,y‘ 1 ) -tli, - N' '' ' ' '', 1- T J_CLI ; is 1-=--E:T/. i.1,:r1-T-.70,11E1 '. 1J ; 1.' _ . .. i \ - sue . . / - , .- — f i , /,) NORTH PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. LA CERTIFICATION • I, ,SG(,Vicl q cJ t(,kSa n , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document . were posted' by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on n 1 5, 1 iqtg . Signed: %(,/1611 r i STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) • • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that f/ /cSon/ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposesmentioned in the instrument. / Dated: '7/5 g 4C-el No ary Pub' in and f he State of Washington . Notary (Print) �f��- / Pa,L -- My appointment expires: /< ,9 qe NOTARY.DOC 4 1 IN_OnCE PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: CHEVRON/MCDONALDS ON FOURTH/LUA-96-037,SA,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests Environmental Review (ECF) and Site Plan Approval (SA) for re-development of the subject property with a Chevron Gas Station and convenience store,with a quick serve restaurant. Three new underground fuel storage tanks would also be installed. The proposal requires setback Variances (V)for the pump island and convenience store,as they would exceed the maximum building setback allowed. GENERAL LOCATION: 3209 NE 4TH STREET PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat Conditional Use Permit Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review ShorelineXXXX VARIANCE • Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's"Notice of Application" publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. f �1.� _ 371 I IY'%I'%1>t i��lfiall.li7iLl%I;1il.nL Islr, : I"..I. :I rj C' i'..,:,.F71•F---1-r;TA ;:•_ is:\ce) :,.: ',1-1. 3 .. : !I, `�J, \ . f r(f(' 'J _4: .' 'i nn,- }±..t'F,cj..'t. i ii 'f. • = I ,. -•Jil. : . . � y:\ � , :T • .._ • prt:-..::i."-t-.1,;7:1".3:!:i)•"...:.i)::. ••• ;9';':::;`:$-:z:\-,511,_ ;,,, ,,, • - i!plii t11-------. ..\.,;__ •.1'.•.' ;, : :: -s • -. es it i. . _ I._—.- .�.�:sue' I ._ I J ,1......IItI- tP . •... ii I _.. .. ✓' I- ..P1--J_ /, � 1.1 p� / ,F.--.L .... ,FIi_ /j I! I . .. j i- i'y... T.': --- ''''' ---' — -,:_! I NORTT-1 PLEASE::INCLUDE THE<P.:ROJECT:NUMBER WHEN::CALLING OR<P.,ROP.E 'FILE:IDENTIFIGATION>'>=:`>';:;°< " CITY OF RENTON adl Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 02, 1996 Emerald City Construction do Mr. Bruce Creager Barghausen Engineers 18215-72nd Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 SUBJECT: Chevron/McDonalds on Fourth - Project No. LUA-96-037,SA,V,ECF Dear Mr. Creager: The Development Planning.-Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. . It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on April 16, 1996. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application for environmental review. Please contact me, at 277-6186, if you have any questions. Sincerely, ` • grh c23, 0*o 16 1-1/ser/1/1Aar> Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager - • cc: C. Lester Alexander& Doris J.Alexander/Owners • ACCPTLTR.DOC • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 #5660 ....................:::::::..::.::.:::.:..:.::...........................:...:........... > '>D :> .;::E !CA1..y..1SCOIV `>;> ><> '><<' ><'> <<<`>'>> >< EUELOPMENT`S:ERUIC S.. . . .. ................... .... .. ` N ' .............................................................. ........................................................................ ........................... .............................................................................................................. Note if there:is fii ore than''o'ne'te al owners''ptease'attach an;additional'. o'aiz`"'. aster:A:.;:::ica::o:<:'fo;":e;•> <>o;:•;;::.;:•: : : ;::> '» >'> :> >:;:''<.>'::<:"`::.::> LAND EXISTINGAN US S E( ). NAME: C. Lester Alexander and Alexander Auto Auction Doris J. Alexander PROPOSED LAND USES: ADDRESS: 15630 S.E. Renton-Issaquah Road Chevron Retail Gas Sales with a 4,350 S.F. Convenience Store and Quick Serve Restaurant CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98055 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Commercial TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: NAME: Emerald City Construction c/o Barghaus'en Engineers/Bruce Creager EXISTING ZONING: CA, Arterial Commercial ADDRESS: 18215 72nd Avenue South PROPOSED ZONING: CITY: Kent, WA ZIP: 98032 SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 251-6222 1.3 AC PROJECT VALUE: PROJECT-OR DEVEL.QPM`NT NAME: Cheliro.n,Gas, Salk s With C—Store and. QSR • IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? PROPERTY/PROJECT.)ACDRESS(S)/LOCATION: Zone 2 3209 N.E. 4th Street Renton, WA 98056 (SWC' N:E:''4th Street & Monroe Avenue N.E.) IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): None Known b era 162305-9111-07 Q�v(i "uFpprvNl� eIvTON G �� . I. :<: q ch>se s�. ,>s.heet` f< t:e'ces • :::::<:::: : .::;:::>:>:::::: . . : . >: < ;: ..R > PERfiY. .. tta _ )..................................... :::>:>::»::>::>;::<:>::::><>;::>::>:<:::::LEOAL:::DESCI�1... .D.(11:.;:OF..P.. O .. :.(.............. ............ ..... ...............................................Y ...:.:............................... See Attached . I1 N & FEES' > ><> > < ><>«><>«> >><>« <><=i>« i<»i>>>>' <€>€<`«<> F:APPLIC ij r :: ct ::>::«:>::>::::::::>::::>:<:>::>::::::>:::::<>::>>::>::>::::::.. � 1c:>: II€:€a (i a i. n:<: es.>that:_ ...s.#a.....................t ............ i —ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ REZONE $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ • _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ • '1 PRELIMINARY PLAT $ j SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ •GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ . (NO. CU. YDS: ) ' PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ X VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION:4-31-10.4D16..., ' PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION _ ,MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN 1 $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ ' _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ .,;.;:.:>.RHIP<`:>>><:;:g:>:»`'i:»><> < >€>i>''>:<><:>> > <:MA::: > <><«::>> ... ................................. ...../�►E..F[DAVIT<OE <OWNE...S........:: ::.::..:....................................................................................... I, (Print Name) 'Jrsra r A7fe.--�iG--.-declare that I am (please check one)X the owner of the property involved in this application,._the authorized representative to act fir the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information he�ewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief,.' . - ' !� ATTEST: Subscrib 6 f sworn to before rile;a Notary'.PUbi,ic,in and 190 4 e. ,7e,c,--,-.-a a✓ f �h-e,7ato of (/ residing a - (Name of Owner/Representative) lArefr,,-��i✓ ,. , on the/s day of e./z4,te,t, a),4d4,1_,Ida) / Lc . a,7„,,,eir' Si nature.of Owner/Re re!sentative) 0 a4 d-� (Signature of Notary ub.c) ..:; ..................................................... .. ..::. ... ........ .::�....mpl..#.... :....tY....................:.......................................................::..:..:::.�:::::::::::::::: ::;.::.;;:.;:.;:.;:�:.;;C.It .. Ile::>Numb.�t... ; :.. ::. ::: ..:.:: ::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::;::::.:::::::::::.�.::::::::::.. ..D......W.....FP.. . ..:::.5 S.ME.....MHP.......13. ................ .P .......:..:........................................................................... > . .. REVISED 2/95 e LEGAL DESCRIPTION (BY OTHERS) Lot 4, as delineated on City of Renton Short Plat No. 373-79 as recorded under King County Recording No. 7910049001, being a portion of the North 330 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. Commonly known as: 3209 N.E. 4th Street, Renton, Washington 98056 • Project: Chevron/McDonald's March 17, 1996 5660L.001 BC/ps - CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST OUR JOB NO. 5660 A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: Chevron retail gasoline sales with convenience store (C-store) and quick serve restaurant (QSR). 2. Name of Applicant: Emerald City Construction c%Barghausen Consulting Engineers,Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Barghausen Consulting Engineers,Inc. 18215 72nd Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 (206)251-6222 Contact: Bruce,Creager 4. Date checklist prepared: March 13, 1996 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable): The facility will be constructed upon issuance of all development permits. The facility will take approximately 70 to 90 days for construction completion. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. None at this time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been Rwmed,or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal. Cerq • A Geotechnical Engineering Report(to be prepared) ,a,,,:3 6 1996 • Transportation Impact Analysis(to be prepared) c " OPhn�N�PLANNING pEV�G T`(OF BEN-TON Page 1 of 19 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] • 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. None known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. • Variance approval for building setbacks to exceed 15-foot maximum • Site plan review approval • Building(structural)permit for canopy, C-store/QSR • Mechanical Plumbing Electrical Permits • Sign permits • Grading permit • Drainage plan approval • Right-of-way permits/driveway permits • Utility permits(sewer, water, storm,power,phone, and gas connections) • SEPA environmental determination • Driveway variance 11. Give brief,complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposed project consists of the redevelopment of the subject property with a new Chevron retail gasoline sales facility with a convenience store (C-store) and a quick serve restaurant(QSR). New buildings would include a 49-foot by 85-foot(4350)C-store building with QSR with a 52 to 60 person seating capacity. The gasoline fueling area would include a 38-foot by 83-foot pump island canopy with 6 multi-product dispensers(MPDs). Three new underground gasoline storage tanks with 35,000 to 40,000 gallons of storage capacity would also be installed. Site development would also consist of new landscaping, paving, lot lighting,and two freestanding identification signs. The project would involve approximately 2,000 cubic yards of cut and fill earthwork activity. One 35-foot wide full-turning movement driveway would be constructed on N.E. 4th Avenue, 125 feet west of the intersection with Monroe Avenue N.E. A 35-foot wide full-turning movement driveway would be constructed 125 feet south of the intersection, and an"exit only"driveway is proposed approximately 100 feet south of the full-turning movement driveway. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project,including a street address,if any,and section, township,and range,if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposed project is located at the southwest corner of N.E.4th Street and Monroe Avenue East, at 3209 N.E. 4th Street. See attached for legal description. Page 2 of 19 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes,mountainous,other The site is generally flat and level. At the south end of the site is a small,irregular shaped area,approximately 20 feet by 60 feet,where the grades are steeply sloping. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Zero(0)to 5 percent. Slopes in the small area described above are approximately 100 percent. c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. In general,the site is underlain by about 1 to 6 feet of loose to dense surface layer of brown silty sand with gravel (unified soil classification SM) overlying a medium dense to dense layer of brown poorly graded sand with gravel(SP). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,describe. None known. e. Describe the purpose,type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Anticipated grading and filling activities include approximately 1,500 to 2,000 cubic yards of fill material. Earthwork activities would be associated with raising site elevations for finished building pads, and excavation for underground gasoline storage tanks. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion may occur as a result of clearing and construction activities. Page 3 of 19 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction? Approximately 75 percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth,if any. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other impacts to the earth include the design and implementation of a temporary erosion/sedimentation control(TESC)plan in accordance with the City of Renton requirements and best management practices established in the Department of Ecology Puget Sound manual. Specific techniques that may be implemented include installation of mirafi filter fabric and rock check dams. After construction, the stormwater collection and retention will be designed to minimize any erosion. 2. Air a. What types of'emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. The proposal would result in potential impacts, both during construction and following facility completion. During construction,air impacts would result from the construction vehicle emissions 'and airborne dust resulting from earthwork activities. Following construction, air impacts would result principally from auto emissions from the customer and delivery vehicles. Additional air emissions may result from the cooking facilities and from the fueling area. ' Page 4 of 19 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. There are no known off-site sources of emission or odor that would affect the subject proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any. Measures to reduce or control air impacts during construction would be principally from the erosion control measures which may include the use of filter fabric fences around the site perimeter. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. There is no known surface water body on or adjacent to the subject property. 2) Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described water? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Not applicable. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. Page 5 of 19 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and ap- proximate quantities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface water? If so, describe the types of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose,and approximate quantities,if known. No water will be withdrawn or discharged to ground water. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. The facility will be connected to the sanitary sewer and thus will not discharge waste material into the ground Page 6 of 19 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Water Runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. Stormwater runoff will result from the paved impervious surfaces and from building rooftops on the subject property. Stormwater will be collected by means of a series of catch basins and conveyance pipes, pre-treated on-site in a biofiltration swale,then conveyed to an on-site infiltration trench/pipe for percolation into the underlying soils. The means of stormwater pretreatment and retention will be in accordance with the City of Renton stormwater standards and the best management practices contained in the Department of Ecology manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. Without the recommended mitigation, it is possible that some waste materials could enter the stormwater system by means of the on-site use. The types of waste materials may include unexpended hydrocarbons,heavy metals, and other substances that are typical of a paved parking lot and maneuvering area. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts,if any. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface water impacts include the aforementioned pretreatment of stormwater in the on-site catch basins and biofiltration swale proposed for the facility. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple,aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass _pasture _crop or grain Page 7 of 19 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage,other _water plants: water lily,eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All on-site_ vegetation would be removed as a part of site redevelopment. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any. Existing vegetation on-site is not proposed for preservation. New landscaping would be provided in accordance with the City of Renton standards for commercial site landscaping, including provision of shrubs and ground cover and trees. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds an animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: X birds: hawk, heron, eagle,songbirds,other mammals: deer,bear,elk, beaver,other _fish, bass,salmon,trout,herring,shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. Page 8 of 19 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any. Provision of landscaping on-site may provide a small, limited opportunity for habitat for small mammals and birds. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,manufacturing,etc. Natural gas and/or electricity are anticipated to meet the completed project's energy requirements. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any. The project would incorporate features for energy conservation as required by the Washington State Energy Code and current building codes. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? • If so, describe. Potential environmental health hazards associate with the development would include the risk of exposure to gasoline and the unlikely possibility of risk of fire, explosion, or major spill. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Special emergency services that may be required during construction phases of the project would include medical, police,and fire services. The same emergency services may Page 9 of 19 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT be needed following the completion of the facility. Hazardous material or response personnel and possible involvement by the State Department of Ecology or Environmental Protection Agency may also be required in the unlikely event of a release of gasoline to the environment. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. The proponent will be required to pay a fire impact mitigation fee. Additionally, the facility provides a significant number of features to reduce and control the potential for environmental health hazards as follows: 1. Emergency shut-off switches are both located inside and outside the building. 2. Fire extinguishers are also provided in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code standards and local requirements. 3. Both the underground gasoline storage tanks and product piping are of double containment type construction. Both are made of double-walled fiberglass-coated materials, which provide significant protection against rupture and/or leakage. The fiberglass-coated material helps prevent deterioration of the walls and prevents subsequent contamination of the surrounding soils. 4. The underground fuel system includes interstitial monitoring of the tanks and piping. This will detect any leaks, immediately alarm the facility operator, and shut down that portion of the system. 5. Upon installation,this system is pressure checked according to the manufacture's specifications to detect any pressure loss and to isolate and correct any problems before final cover and paving. 6. Additional primary and secondary containment equipment and spill prevention features include overfill protection features, gravity return of un- Page 10 of 19 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT dispensed product, flex joints at tanks and islands. breakaway/impact valves and dispensers. 7. The training of drivers and clerks in emergency procedures also aids in avoiding the release of fuel into the environment. Drivers are trained in transport,.delivery, safety and fuel containment procedures. Clerks are trained in emergency response procedures. b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example:traffic,equipment,operation, other)? Noise in the area which may affect the project would include traffic on the adjacent roadways of Monroe Avenue N.E. and N.E. 4th Street. However, this noise is not anticipated to negatively impact the operation of this facility. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or • associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise that may be generated by this project would include short-term noise, created by the operation of construction equipment and vehicles during the demolition,site grading, and construction of the facility. Long-term noise would include the noise of internal combustion'engines from customers' vehicles, delivery trucks, and the operation of site and landscape maintenance equipment, including lawnmowers,leaf blowers,etc. The short-term noise would be generated during the approximate 3-month construction period during daylight hours. Long-term noise such as landscape maintenance would also occur during daylight hours, whereas noise associated with automobiles would occur during the 24 hours per day operation of the gas sales/C-store and during the 16 hours per day operation of the QSR. Page 11 of 19 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any There are several features of the proposed site design which intrinsically provide some mitigation of noise impacts of the proposed development. With the gasoline pump island canopy situated near the corner of the intersection, and the C-store/QSR further south,the C-store building may assist in some buffering of noise generated at the corner of the site, which will tend to be the area with the highest automobile activity. The presence of landscape screening along the south property line may provide a minor, limited noise mitigation as well. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently used for the Alexander's Auto Auction. The use of adjacent properties is as follows: • to the north, across N.E. 4th Street, is the parking lot for the Renton Voc-Tech College (zoned P1, public use) • to the south, the site is used for a gravel mining operation(zoned R-10,residential) • to the east, across Monroe Avenue N.E., is the Greenwood Memorial Cemetery (zoned R-8, residential) • to the west is a small business center housing the Renton Collision Center (zoned CA, arterial commercial). b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Unknown. c. Describe any structures on the site. The site currently has a single building of approximately 6,500 square feet. Page 12 of 19 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? All structures on the site will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning designation of the site? Currently zoning classification is CA, arterial commercial. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation for the site? The current comprehensive plan designation is Employment Area- Commercial (EAC). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,specify. The site is underlain by an Aquifer Recharge Area Zone 2. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Depending upon the shift, five to eight people are expected to be working at this facility.. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? The completed project would not displace any residents, as the current use is for an auction facility. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. No displacement mitigation measures are proposed. Page 13 of 19 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any. Proposed"measures for compatibility with existing and projected land use plan include compliance with all zoning standards except for the front yard setback variance to exceed the 15-foot maximum setback allowed for buildings under 25 feet in height. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle,or low income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle,or low income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any. None proposed. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The gasoline pump island canopy would be approximately 17 feet in height. The C-store/QSR would range rom 17 feet to 22 feet in height. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The views of the subject site from the public roadways would be altered by the removal of the existing Alexander's Auction facility and construction of a new commercial facility. Page 14 of 19 • 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. The proposed project is seen as an improvement to the aesthetics of the subject property. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposals produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The only light which will be produced by the proposal will include illumination of the canopy/gasoline fueling area and internal illumination of the buildings, and perimeter lot light illumination. The only glare anticipated to be produced by the proposal would be headlight glare from the automobiles circulating on site and exiting the driveway to the public roadways. The light created by the proposal is not anticipated to negatively impact the operation of the roadway. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? The only off-site sources of light would be headlamps from cars on the abutting roadways. However,this is not anticipated to affect the operation of the facility. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. The use of perimeter landscaping is expected to assist in mitigation of light impacts onto adjacent properties and onto the abutting roadways. Page 15 of 19 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 12. Recreation a. What designation and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project. or applicant, if any. None proposed. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national,state or local preservation registers to be on or next to the site. If so,generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, ar- chaeological,scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any. None proposed. Page 16 of 19 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,.and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on-site plans, if any. The subject property would be served by both N.E. 4th Street and • Monroe Avenue N.E. Access to the proposed street system would be by means of a total of three driveways. One 35-foot full-turning movement driveway would be constructed to N.E. 4th Street, approximately 125 feet west of the intersection. One 35-foot full- turning movement driveway would be constructed to.Monroe Avenue N.E.,approximately 125 feet south of the intersection. One exit-only driveway would be constructed approximately 100 feet south of the full-turning movement driveway to Monroe Avenue N.E. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? N.E. 4th Street is served by Metro bus transit. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project would have approximately 40 parking stalls. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improve- ments to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). No new roads or streets would be required. Improvements to the existing roads would include construction of a sidewalk along both street frontages. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail,or air transportation? If so,generally describe. No. Page 17 of 19 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Please see The Transpo Group,Inc.,traffic impact analysis for total and new vehicular trip generation. Peak volumes are anticipated to occur during the peak volumes on the adjoining roadways,due to the high pass-by trip generation. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. A significant percentage of trips on site would be shared between the retail gasoline sales and the C-store/QSR. Payment of a traffic impact fee, in accordance with the City of Renton traffic impact ordinance, would serve as mitigation of transportation impacts. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools,other)? If so,generally describe. The only possible increase in public services would include the potential increase in fire protection and police protection services (see Item No. 7,Environmental Health). b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. Mitigation measures to control environmental health hazards have been discussed under the Environmental Health section. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural , gas, water, .refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system,other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utilities providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Page 18 of 19 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT • Electric power: Puget Sound Power&Light Company • Phone service: U.S. West Communications • Gas service: Washington Natural Gas Company • Sewer/Water: City of Renton C. SIGNATURE I,the undersigned,state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: /i14 •e r / Date: Page 19 of 19 5660.005 [BKC/kn/ps] LEGAL DESCRIPTION (BY OTHERS) Lot 4, as delineated on City of Renton Short Plat No. 373-79 as recorded under King County Recording No. 7910049001, being a portion of the North 330 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington. Commonly known as: 3209 N.E. 4th Street, Renton, Washington 98056 • Project: Chevron/McDonald's March 17, 1996 5660L.001 BC/ps qLGHA GS 'et CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING,SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 44MM0 Sp� `: �� March 18, 1996 Sk6 � may, 'kG ENG% '' Ms. Jennifer Henning City of Renton Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Environmental Review, Variance, and Site Plan Review Applications for the Chevron/QSR at the SWC -4th Avenue and Monroe, Renton, Washington Our Job No. 5660 Dear Ms. Henning: On behalf of Emerald City Construction, I am writing to request the City of Renton's Environmental Review and review and approval of a Site Plan and a variance request from the provisions of Renton City Code 4-31-10.4 D 1 (Street Setback) to permit a building setback to exceed the maximum setback of 15 feet. To support this request, I am enclosing for your review and processing the following documents: 1. One original and ten copies of a Master Permit Application. This application has been signed and notarized by the current property owners of the project site. 2. Mailing labels for all property owners within 300 feet of the boundaries of the subject property. 3. Two copies of a signed and notarized certification form of current property ownership. (This document lists the surrounding property ownership information and attests that the information was obtained from the King County Assessor's office.) 4. One check payable to the City of Renton to cover the site plan review and variance application fees plus the mailing label fees. 5. Eleven copies of a justification for the variance request, including a project narrative. 6. Eleven copies of a construction mitigation description. 7. Eleven copies of a neighborhood/vicinity map. FlECi6V D 8. Eleven blueline prints each of the following plans: AR 1 8 1996 • site plan • generalized utilkeeEWJAEN i PLANNING • landscape plan • architectural elevations OF RENTON • grading and drainage plan • floor plans 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT,WA 98032 (206)251-6222 (206)251-8782 FAX Ms. Jennifer Henning City of Renton Planning Department -2- March 18, 1996 9. One 8 1/2-by 11-inch PMT reduction of each of the site plan, utilities plan, landscape plan, elevations, and vicinity map. 10. One 4-by 6-inch reduction of the neighborhood detail map. 11. One colored display map of each of the site plan, landscape plan, elevations, and neighborhood detail map. 12. Five copies of the Level 1 drainage report. 13. Five copies of the geotechnical engineering report. 14. Eleven copies of the Environmental Checklist. I appreciate your prompt review and processing of this variance and site plan review request. Please notify me at your earliest convenience of the scheduled date of the Hearing Examiner's public hearing. If there is any further information you need to assist in completing your review of this request, please do not hesitate to contact me immediately at this office. Sincerely, Bruce K. Creager, AICP Senior Planner BKC/ks/es 5660C.005 enc: As Noted cc: Mr. Andy Lakha, Emerald City Construction Mr. Randy Welch, Emerald City Construction Mr. Jay S. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. - • • . . • - ' , .'.24THISI....HR ea'''.'V•'E..i...':.'-''''-=.047.Vril'•''''''''a -'"' SE -.11gliglatjMil;-;:•'•••• '''.'1E7 NEIETE*';773715RDLIT'Z'L'cl7-:`,7.7•1-r,,''r'77-771 SE[102 '.. '. '''' ''''''I "llaS'r''''l '-''' y •.- ; 4 ,-.r ." ' 's'-',`.!.i.e.'s-K.tr:,:.,•-?:$(!%;''.'•';:-A ,- ,.,--,-a .,-,.,,-,....11='AY-0,25kWr,,,,,,'•,' --;,t i,-1,1,gt,',...:),1 ff ,NE. Rn r;••"-•.I5st!"Ar''''1'7;"2-1-',''',..:.-•••••Tif..!-:"•,\1 4 ..' '°... *..•4';',...MV.4.1, °i;.$c•••'10 E: . ,,,„,,,,-, ,:r..., , •°•.---.; ' ''. .`;1'.'"..!). ','`..'.' ...,,-....,-,4.7,-...;,-,,,',7f:-..,57: Ma'' `;'', t'.!,,t,"°;, Stg:'as',•-' , 44,'Air '',`'. -.11511!.1-•••, u,e';',1:TP,'1.,i,,L,-;Tyil;',:•',.,.'. r''';', v.;-1•'.. ,sE4404111' .......,'4,gr •.,...,.--,.--3.2,34. ,,.,,1,, ,,,r,•-x,- ',1;•• .-e_1„..i:3hce Iii' •.i.•:,-',,',14,.'•,t%,t"4 i'4',.4.51;11M-;.•,',..,,,Y;11,E1.•:',;ice,_,-,_,-z,44.7„,,-..-!i" -,400 rx-sr.,•..409. 51"),..-1.g.r.l'iv . f..z4 •,-..,,,•:7-4-..;,••',..d.e.,!'... ;,:',..,..t 7•4\t''''''`.74';' '•••,":"'eg 4t.:17i;gi 8;1'1°' `;°•-- ij,-.31,"'...,:;!.-4,,.,'i,il'0,...,„...., ‘,:-..?-,,,!,7,..sE 0,Th i-Pz t3,4-7,4,1';' 5;,,,ii..7, . .,T, 7 4-,-e..-,,,.;•fo,0;1*-„,;.,,2,, 1 it4 4;,- , ,,,,.,;,,,T...:-.' .eg ,al t!`il•;"''.°":.'1 EgAT ".6.°."..?:''' ,''. PA:`` .,:°°•",'.4,?-ts7,410.1,... •,P,'11.I 'NPPiLd s I,A.I.*filt'AL', '•11, .":;,..',if-,, •.:PP i:°:`:-°,l'...19,,,,"• 4.,' ,05„, ,1-;•,!..-.. „.:,-,,-;,,,..„,7,-s,,,,,,,,,e,-, 31,,u.,,,,,,,,,,,:o.,;.f.,,,,v,',.,-;."1-,,....;',,,f-,11fe,-.--'3,1,mr Is*,4..-4-41.,,,,,itki.,.IL. ,iiiii.,;,s,r#,.??.ii,,,,,,,:,i,..,,,..,,,,..,..,,,.„,..„,,,,,,:::,.,,i 45.,,,,,,.,.,,,:i ti,,,,-,.-,,,,,i,,,.,..' SE ;:tioii.,,,,..-1 •1,,•,y,i g,,,,,I1 rly,.,,f.,::•I'ili.":;,11,111 i,77;,,,,,:t ,II 1-'16#01,0's.,4"'',ti*,,,,4'-'1.,,,,4'i v.,-.rtz p-,'7.4".,),',-- --'''. .;.'?,,',.-7:•'1,..,!."j- ,tti.,,, , .,4*;'14%1;1,0",i,v,A.,,.! -..i..-.f e.i..,', .-.$ PARIl • r'; .A''''';'.41,f_',"'n' .4^.'"Iir4',M... .'0Crt,C‘.":11 ti, ,.,,0'(1,,,,-. ;•-•• '" ,,,';.•:,3,,kl,,,,,,..4'44 1 . ' ''... 71,14',,'" ,...V4:,...'':•;4'.4-‘:•!,;bli,'.,°•?••I Li,°;...''','•1'..•6••.ii PA ."'r'4'' -,4/1..-,..,I.„ ! .-.5rit,f;,,•;,,; „.1,',.,,i, ;„ ....,,, ,..,-.., .v.,/-,.. cr'7,- i-,5;a•,:••-.8 e..if, .„.;,,,,, ..,4E.p.,,e.... f'sp „e...*:.,., , " .,-,t;,,,„„La.r .....,.„...,...,...,......„-r, ••.. ••-;,.••.••••• , ,,,,, __. 7-•- ,r.,•,-, --,.§ ,; . . ..tl'i'''• ''''''3' ' i''''''-n- • g al° .1•-•.-c- -me ,-,01,.:.,..• -.,.suasi..-r,..•:AisiJ,,ori,* , fs...1.,--•4•19,-Vi ."'4,, ,' ,-' •. -. ' I .«,,•.,,F., ,1,.:...1 .- -gl . ..2400 ur.,,. "k• ;,, •-'"'AP:, .cr ../!"1-",,!•-:i"-- 00..--• Z":'<."'S:E.i4:c. ....lrff,...,..,,54 p,,...101,...'k900 4,r,4f 4 ..,I, BDAT LA -1'. '' )' ."P'''FIV,PCIlill:X',I.,..--..-11:7-„,'" , ni iF,,! 7, e'rt', '1...48,414LAANA:43,„.,,,,,Tvrir.i I-_,•"' -;;VP.Ii.'1. ONv•-,-,,' ';'..';-;;'''''''v'il ,i`°`• `i- 3k %.....,1:: iff•-•311.dg •48:c-,.-"c-.' •4ef'-'*' ''.%.:•. 1 '`TP-1,,,...ii ;i.igilF,..'.•;",„, "••I'ii,',, p14'4,,. '');'4.f.f'..'" .':0":',A'Jo" ---•1;f-irci ;.5,,,,#;6>tg'§;,, (`' - NE 13',11, if,,,7 •.A.'„ •''s'i';`,4.4.Z.,,,i,-,17;'-1,:,:g??.;::-.-e;:i..--= '....1'if..#''''--,-11;":!--":',',; ,'.-'.1--7:1';,'.---' l'- '' 1 ..;,. _- p. •4•.,:r.iv,,_15,41 al rl'i,,,, ..Ek.rq=,L,, 003Th , pm.,,,,.445."4.15,',- ,:•;•;7-,4E.,..,E.4,-4;-„:,:,:y.V-1,4-,N,,51Etzp;;• =.•,;;:;=4:.F,.,, „T5.1i ' 1 .‘1, TP.,,, ,.gi, •.'''',,,,.i-o!§,TY;;.&-atiiy" ,Z.,..' •P'.-YI: ..1'-'1.4.:-711E;1„*-//.4,,..(-Sf 7.g'',1'..;_ i .,-.;..i.1 cii mil :1'°4' .\-cD:P.,, ,,-,„,,'IF•.AL -? -...,.,....i ..:'c,.- -'- ..-1'',-. ."- - • ..,- ,if,-,M,..,1'..•,,ffi..,:',ilsw.T.::'',-•: "700"--P.; 41,, .ieflr•-: :.-titii"-‘, •;":"1.,,,,.;14300 „ .,,,S''''.!4/•••,4?"414.'1. e.i 4,•.,i-glett P'.-.'='40 4,, <.,-.4..ii,§...Kftr...),/•,,et. ! '-`,. '.'''',',..-4 'n.s,°' •,!.'z;i', ':'.C.` ,',,,' .,'‘' „ S'''4. .e...;?,it,k5 3"71-A -.1 •:. • i.,'•-;•sPO' A.m.''' ,.' ''Fa..-`,...,•,5 '.a..1',,-„,, -„ •:---'114••••;f1t,4,, .,,E--.;•,,...Z-,?,-;r1Y.,;; V* 545 -:4••900 4..!PAN--'IRA''41,1 '.e.f...,.,7,-V,-;r'..yi`4 g JulalawgIk.4kz. .. '''. ...' i. 21. i i 1 IF ilEng ' ! •'..-1...;:g;:t410' . „4*' 1 ''.,:',...?,,i•Fr,•,04-iii. , ,,,,,,,,,3 .‘1.,, .p.,--,-..-..;74.,4,,,..ic,,v,40,ra.tx.::-.!;'?;:„..4.1. 4-16liegev!..,:i_ .m,.... ..--,--z1v ,7,•mitwiii.„,-- -'----,..-<..,....,,...?.,-.•,,,,-. ,. -,may. ,,,,. • u6-c,„ -,,ii,--,:,:-.,.„,..,'--.,•••;,v ,,./.,,, . ,._..,... .„..... 'Me - ,•-,,,,,,'',.??•'-' ". ..••; „-; ''''•',"„;', ' , , ,„1,,:„;,A ,,,, , °14'''';`•;:4',M mi. ...,.:' ,;,.--1 sy .- .•,i4Tor ',-;ek. ".',-.;uk:,••*.,'' q.i,: T....413`e..i.;.:... '441 MP,,. Kt,otiit'sf,,11,$i',,,,tifitsViii'6;;4A ."A-l'''-' Etiziiiii,f41%.0.ysTA n f");;',t,,-. ss si • tke,Pl.%p-, -,,Li ,,s-,-,,z, 1.1,,,:,,• ..,.;,,,i,,,,,,., .,..., „„r. ,•1!.."'T'''••,'.F-11 ,,,,b•-. ,, . • ::,'A,-•‘'''''''4'', -'1' ' -Pe.,' 41 '''''7 • \'IP .': iA N5,911itliO.L:.rs3R1-::' ••,C,T.e.'I ;utify,..".409.4 ,.1,z,,..zIT,,,N,,,, ,,,,.,..,.. ,, . „ ,„ . .,,,,,,,• •A '',....-S('''',,h'./. .:.;',.. .''' :',..15N''c.:•';:* ' "'rk4t.,,51.,j's.1,,,, '''V4 ii.,,,'"'• l'IY!,ossa_iNNN•4 AE4,1 .1',745'•:51'' ,r.P.ZINEkt• .,to ,,, ,,,,,,,,,.,„......,,, ,. _ ,,,,, ,,,,:,,.,„„...,,,,,,,,,,,,T05-,.»7'.41 2,:',-tiW -: '-• T-.., :ii far., ' . iP'' , i..".,2.,1:...q-• ..s; •Yii,;.>.•„P,i;•,••••41Q,P4' •`44 g "-• ::'°••••'•::°...:''-'',',','.4.''''P',";';17.f, '''',34. •V,,.7,01.4?.1': -I V",40,.,14 MElt% .-.4A'cl:;j5r0?' .-f,,..,?1 ., ... '1,'L.'_'•'''.,,,,m.,tf tk.,"t.liV:e::3-P-i--.'',.; '2,1° i :'''..'.-z ,„...,',A=.;',,, ,,-,,,„,..i.r,,, i.:,,,,,, ,'".';' 1, ''-,,,\',q •-•.:%-Artit,,, ; • It,;?,,.=:•:;!„,.,.•--.7 :•;,•,-... •,4E.ie.,,,u,kvA,:,,,...1.,,,,T,..9•-•,•,- ...:,.,,g,.,..;‘,....,v&-,,•,),-;,,z-,,,. L•,.,:.';,'1....;%.'1f.2•„i..'t—'.',,1I,,.,;:,;!'r:4'l"....,,-.-....,;.',•'•,.;:.'.g-'..--•';•:-.',1;:',:-'•".-,''11.':.,.-1a,1','.,5'k,',. .„.:.'.---,,,.-.-:'„.'.7':i,-?'i_<-.''-'.7.','_',',`',7,.,'-%...,.-?.-,,;-,:,'‘,.7 j..7Eis.i..1.i,.!.'. ,.f,'0.,.0 './?:•,• Y'.%— :.-,,,i:'7•,.I::.- f-i-V-lic' -,A.iE‘Ls, ,S'•vo..v1gW,•13I20,1'1 1 s;T :a-,f...".,,-;.$z:;.,--",,• ;..<.'-,-,,R6;.5',,,.;''1,:'•".-L',•E:..':4:-,,.f.;i<,{;E,<':E?".!1t•.i."44,:t"4.i.,.-.1I.:..i--I."li..".SeVg7!,.-..,A,t,-'.;-,:..-.,...:.:-I...7.s2.':..'„S".3E itG mizauSosTt ST 4• Y4L •.‘.,, .4 '-',v,pi,_,- IMES•• :,.. :,.--,..-,..i--\;-;;•,;,,,--,,igar'..lardiffila"\113,, ,..,. ,_,....="sw'Ne.LnEL'ISMAIMIII-4-''"•-• — - —... , ---.-----..,. ._ ("<<•:,-1,-:.-•<•-•<,-4:. ---,,,,,-..', ------.<- - t",''..,'''• :" ',"•i',4 M4 ''''<'''4 ',,',---',''';'-'''';-7/4";',,v..."‘l'i'•‘', 1,'".‘''I !4.475m-gw,fforf: --,'1-i 2- ...,,••:.,,,,4„,..,„....., _:, ,.,,,,,,, SE 124TH ST ' Ffia-';= ..f:Z4i6444 Mr'?L'''.-.*'X'-',':.•,..,S.'i t .A1 ,, ,-`,4,-'•P:;4, 4•:'‘W''4::-1:-6..i"..-71' 011-1.i?,•; ,-., ,NE•;,.;,.•;.„,,,6111'•,- , •:.-',. ;-:FTV.I'•-.``4.•I':'•. "...- ---:,-,It':,:1•4.-'f;1 - i,;ii,;,.c. i Mill''''. ..,,,,.,,4,..1:1'404„vw,-,,g.f..„ • ',,,: d , -•,.; ;, .,,,,3-1 Ha., :,,..A. - ,t1-.V.,-Tei,,P.5§,......iii•INCNEr.3.,%*- .%''' ,?:'c -"•:.in.'sr,., ...i-,.:-.- • i l''''''''''' -Pilti ', .-&';'12.'41'417.p.':;,---',rill'''. ,r?•'°•;;.5- ;it',Y.:• RE2 i-1g ill),iis" `;.z.vt .7;4.",:i,:si7.•!;-imtiis..-,A.,,,.0•,,,,,,, •_.,-;:',...;,..,,,,, .:„:.;‘,..• .1,.,,-,,iE, 126TH ,,, ,.-,0;:•Ir,r.:7,1 l'",..Z!`.'..,,,,S4'1; -;,'7,.. '-,..,1'.,!4,,..,,..,- ,..... ,j.;`.,,,,..:3.,„... -1,....,..,'OLY"E...,...4.4.;•.:.;:..-5'',:r.-t,-”,;.;•,..-.,...,`3',4:;i4W,ilk.,V-C.2,..,,.-•,,::, SE 12STH ST y(,...", . '.. .'W:ii.;. ,','. ..:47,1z,f,-,&..„-i4;-14,, .' f.,,`-'.':,-", ,-:;"',''''-,,,-1',,`I ) ,,Tts, . ,.„<..,/ .i,,,,,,Aot .<4.0,0,<,.'.,.<<,'--:A1400,- • ,,,,s;:.wi',..z5,Trati cAl. .:.,?.;.3",fsi,;'-:z.'n',.;V,-i . '...-A', ."y:, :,`,:;,::— ' •:: 5- 4' • ,..i.4?4,I„..,,::,,,-..,,,,z.-dr,.11.. ,,,,F,;;;'-'<'.',,`:•. "16::':',.‘i4.41: '<*4 ",•?<:'?".../;',<I-z?•<.,<7<f•;:;1'<::-<,./IN'i-'-',6 ,.'zI',','•:',;.';"'„r 1;4;'•:,M g•;,;•:','-'-' t 2 :: ,,,,t:! , .,10-1,•-900„, • , „,3 i&item,„...2 ,,•,qi, .A...,..•COLL. . , ,.:;', F,IITH,;...',;:,,!;,,= ..;i,,,,,::,,_-„,. ,..,,t,,p,, ,::ST- -e - SE 128TH ST ,410,:' ' i ,,,,,gri . ,„4„,‘„,,,,,, 1,,,ff,',,,C',...t..`2V .j.,k1S4 •,..43.,;:tr:, !ii.,,,,,,,,...-.:,-;','„;:.4i..5,ki, -•,,,"0.-5."•!,,,;.f2;•,..:r•L,.i c...-.;'.".t t'/:" ''''II;''-`'''41,1-22C ; v ;IP''"'s''''''kP''''-i''%•',' r,,t,.'...,;:c-,M,, 1 • rafporkol,o....:!•,.(,.. ...,,.'i ..;,,,y, ..!r,..c,PL,".,4 -,,,,-.,, SE 129TH i:•T i."1-3 Ewa il ' -- .,- 1",.0*.`A,-;',,f'- ti,-,,is't- ,,,-.',-`41.,',.1,'4' - . -.. ,R•mki,,,,:Y.••itit.iko•••.cf:-.- ..k,:.,...--,fif; .,t,••.,,.•:. -,..,:•';.1.1 PL -akif,.,-' 1-':, May :-.4r .' ..-,A,-%-..,:,,,,i;,,,ke!.. ow ' .-'4.,,,r,,h-:- .,-- Af':: 't, ''''.'•"i-it,fx-1::: ,-,,,,..,..:, ,!,,,,q,..-,--.,..,:,, ,,.,-o,,,,, .•:,'t,,,,,:,-., liS7igkinit.41011,.--.72,.1;•,,,i,75sqlig,.§',Is „.,,,,,,-.0,,,,-. .. ,,,...,1'547413-:''''''''''S1 -4;r"''..4',14:?''-V•.`;;:',.1i1;';iNEOV'•Ip!' r-.1 JE. --- 62ND '''. ST 41' 411.4. Emmy /A.-7:•-1,..AD -, ,:l..:a-,-,*: („y ,,-...i. , rr-,'Ai;:f-...;1. .-i,.Allii.,s;...t.,.4:'-li•.,,••4••...,•„,t--4ki..,L.,..4,-.: -,... 1 111.M., ..,4:•ei..,'•,.,?4 ,„0.cry,ii,?..:., r..,.„...„, I's??',,- '''..-!''i ; 15 .re MA, ST r-1 .;',1 ' 'e"'''' 7k *Pi,',s„//AVP:_.c.':'ilt.,,,.',.5,_-!-Lff.1-711.'`,0 41,. ... .s..-..;‘.,.'.4'4,?3‘2..t,-44:,l'i,f..".1.1-E iiii:.i,-,,,,,..., 1,,,.,TA,„;;•,-: - :-.,, 3,9, ' ';',1."'N',-.--' ; sssil'a.1 !• l'itA174:11i %fr•T'-t, lc --de—s.0-4,;,-,4.4'..c:i.vA..,N.Eisug;-, „,,,x. 1.,:,,,... -;.:•,4, .- rav`"',74,...: '` 'i;l4W':t."0,;,y,,''' '''''.*:''"It,t` .'YeT i WA''''..,44V'g.Zci fiiiAiii.L•I'd 011 l'i7.4'.:3,5.".': i''''il lEni e s 1111 = .31 ',e;• ':`'I 1\, . • / -0.. '''.' , .,lig,3:°41YEink,`4-4ititAl,,,fe,;-,.:,-4f.„"*1,;ifilbo'if:;g4::q_btl,,,sl'AR6P-*-:;;JI,-.OW "sT ; ra .. 0 0 / ST. '•``',i-S11,41/AV; A,401'..,.<-....;144,4,4V7441,,,,tt.pifoli4k..li rt-14,1ulit'''',:illt-4:',::,'Pt-.Y!..;.<";n7ts."(-I,,,-1.„„.„:,,i•.=."iV Fit A ,i`P''' SE • se''''114-50104' D://-151-$741 u-4d-'-'..Y1 ..!3''')et•Iibif,V;Iftkrr'iltat• '',L',''tligt.%.:'44t.'4' ,'‘;7:••;; '1'7'.i''•ti4:1.'`,•.,--'-'..42•'. ' Alligir§z..'1';':''CL'i rs 41' 4 l'nx° R,!': g 0 ‘4-11Fler(iPri,.1,11...-::'44''''''I'r" 1-..64,4StktiM, .'.i C.„ •,;,,z)Aw.,..ine;.;.i-; ,,,, ,,t...-4,..,,ii.;,,,,,,,,, ,,,.--1/.,,.?.-0.1, ,,,iiiietv, , , s,....., ___,::1 ),.4,:' ' ,c1;:,.-,,,,,,r- „4,....,-;,,,-,g:T'-,9-0-- r,21:.\•,,Pe,,,. .0.,„,,,-,..,g-,.•„,,.iro,,,Nop,,,,,,rmvq,,,,,,iis.7i-„,,g:::*,,,','74,,,..',t4 3:i74:;‘'it.t.,. N40::400sr"'-'.:,titTP,1 '-1 ; ''' tg;,,,i2.!•',70J in-1-1 r ''VP,igliii /j 1'0,..,-.•,--4i,e,f,,,,•1.''.',,,-•`•••.,..-:`,.'„4/..i••,i %..,\.yekisf@it'Tiukf,iIvr/r•i',',,.•."'Zttrig10,F,;.1••••';',--,”•:,,,;‘," •.'ee,..,••.**,•''',. •aD. ,.- 't--P4 ,o..--'•r.•s‘v'''') '' : 4,,...,g14 ' di :;:i„i°,c1"114,10'41".474•Its.3;t M.,7•°.7/4-4fiii,•;iiy.'i.„.4.,*/1' ?.10-q,;t...,i,.-it'o.;,,,i.f.,14,1',1;;;':4,,i:i,,-.!fl.'7154,"..,.‘,„,,,, ,, .?„,,,,:,6110,,t.',406.,.;;:l 04,4 'gills i-ii .0!046-tlibr.ii:e;',rqi.', ';',0',..4.;,::.'zi41`.11:1,6•1'.:-.Its-6..Z .-•'.;,-;,,,:.!,„.";A:v...,6:.:47,,,,y,w(t...g...'iL,,...?_11:•,,,:z,2,11,t. . ,,,-1.,,,-.J SE sr ' .... 141ST, D4.1 140M PL . -ppEU' Eilt SE IEV.!521 ; iii ,,',1,4-t-*--4;-:f-4,V,40.41.:3:,r?..44-„,. -a, .1,.,,cii.,•12p..14,,.%.,, ••1;t,".•,,:...„..L.,,2,,,,,!_4„....:;:,,:srzy.,1,1$1,1„.,,,,tig.,1,r,,„,,,71 142ND ST 7s• ',S , ,44•0iTs,„..44,, $4••" ;-), '''''''':•1°-;""'"*'*''''''' - -"'" ii s, If' v'',4' ••...'"," • ''`.vY'04;1•-t.".--4,•':'14e4'.,•,.f., gtH'..5,1361964,..:''4':44'51.,','1:2)1.i'l";.:> <- V., ,%,..... ,'`''''' ., '.„ '•44,:-P:61,441.-•••V , 10.74-4.vii-s1,41.-P, iiitl.,fe. 1'.--,•:.,,,,,,, v..,---..... - ---,'-1-,190-01e.- ... 'aa-......-1;',1 .0 '144 •P., ST PL 5;•:',1';'.'k''''4'iy'r'!fil`...,--,;*'.1r........,:l.#..A•;•,1rA"-•:,'",•••••;,:',-,-,',.. 1-,-,,, ••.v.471,,,,,,,..ii,•••,4,,si....--.*1-&p,,..•...,„,.,,,,tiki SE 1454 iii 644,4-14,03,,,.$4tr.A:.4.-i LI,:•;,1•.4,4,,,,-k-,- 43vT1 ••- iii,„...a.r"---.::-,..r.'..g.-k3r.1.4.1&-rq,..,:,L.._,..,,,..,..,.,.....„--,.,„:"••°V•Y 1..,..47 ,e .s, ,-,•.,.,.,..1 ,,,tz,,,;:,vpmetn9131 ST TonnlaWM,2;.-'1VY';`':•Yr3k9'',is4514'.'F%Vi'il&'&;%4:4 A--5'*&.4.-:;*-','?•,..4,MIt.4-'iVsi;;t4.-. .-.- • ?1.z••••:+SII,,,L.f,;•14.).-1-;:,'4.!9:45,,,e,,`,V•.-Iii•I / 8 , . alqi,,,;',,ri.i'f' ,''-'..- 7,11,75i.11111'7,ii :,,,,,,,tiK 4.t.-,,',;.,:.."44'..i'ii.geIi,fir-.-ii,",1V7 Wii:-..Y.,\k"--iVait,fifieiti-.4A'.r:',. 4`,S,\!,': ,,-,1,'.,'-fe,3A-.•ilbV4-;;;3.',T-L'ig'-'."4 :1.1 4- • 11:,,,,-.F3.6/.'rtil4t$t-..,. ,,,,'8,..,.,r,N4:`,145,,,,,,, ,,-,•..g.'1,,,„.0kEPFt}A_410P4 4ilYttNrIt'DIN ULU LI VI:.,4<f:-.'4',<,,°.ssF".•-:"'\'',P. .,..'c';'.i.""i<:-.•1•••••.' • '-:, tot!1,...!„„k,;,.,,..0 ..v.",• ..,...• ,..4...T.it.:1,,yr,,,,,,--..,II.,,,ti:•<<,?t:3*,,,p,_:,....,' "Oil',",,;‘,.•''"'4-r,N.,,,,,T,,Ii.114,..;?..-41i'e?''1:...f,':',;-=''=-= --W,--,"'•-•" :,;:i;;•„i5q:;:P• ..7n..-„-.4„:",.:-,..%,:,--,•-•'.; .,--..,V.,',',P-, 4t-•c"..4-,,e4i•j•:..V,0,;%-r8.?„.,;.,-P,..--ci;ri,e,,,.--.:;.0".",,,, ,-.31;'..•tre4.:1'..t,-r4,1'-.''''.&',,..,•;' • ”J'i;-: •ig;••":-.P.-,,,,e',14,,,,.5',, C:•'.....,‘..- -1?P.-- -• N,,,,,,„,.,,,,,,_,,.,.,,,.,,.„..;,,,,,,.,:„ ,.....„-,0.m3 1?,"'...'.--,',....;,-.-19,:',it-4,4...74,9„-.4.?"7,-44.:.1,.'7.1"1"0-.;,-.10,11.Y.,...iA4',X.-,-.5; -'4-1,..''.,,,,,f k'•,,,,•.-F',•,‘,-I.:2.,•.:'•:,,,-.,;•;,, ,,,, ,-. . • --,..f "---....,,..... •-;:v. ...,,,,,i,,,4-r?:,,,,,-;•;.,,,,,,,,,-,..$.;;;y. 14,15'.',.1,4.n'.;f,,,,...a...:k,,,gt-'..1.r.,ftp,,,,,i,•••,t1r,:KI-.6-,,. .,;17,ti"...,•„io- ,,,,k,v..,%;:f.1•14;,,•4, :-,.,-•,•,.4k.,,,...„f41.1.:cip,,,,s-;,.,i,i,....7!,-'... .•F::,-..s.,-..j. 0, , Ai.... ''....,•,,,,,„'--,;:-=';-,-;/„.1f-t.,:z.?„,,,,-..-1,,,,,,,,, , ___xeeiiii•RI .:3,-i;N.- 13'4;04.'*'..,,,---,',-.:41.8,L,-,,,;1.4'`iov.,,,)!i,-44,1.0,,,..z,i17,4,?- sy,,-,,,.. •4,4t.,, ,,,,, I .‘._.,.,,,.•:'4,-.47).:7.--7.---„,-,,- -..-,,,,,-,wr - - ,, •---sriiiy,,r-:2-2,,:--:::..,,4.,-,--.-4t•If.mivER'i. .,',., ‘' ',",phg ""i„ ,,,,...1`1•V ; '..4:•,.''.'.•...i.••,:• --1-;//g1-,•i'.'-'•u74--:-!''.., s's's ' •`.'''-'.f; •„, , '•'47•-•,-.2I";••••••':;l'A•18-; •°,:y'...".T.. '4,.*7 jr. ,eivt ' '"•--,-,1" ,Ji'.•••*ifrkli..48Ectottigr4j •° --1,'.•,.-",,if,, )..- '... '- -i- 41:,-:-'','••,' 1,•`'eP.'• s. ' 4,',...._' A-.' ‘• ' -t':',.•:i• ,21( . ,... ,.,-.,,,, ,.i.snit,,,,,4::,Ii.ei , ...,.,. ..,,,:„...: ,,,,,..,.,,,z,....,, ,,,,IF,„s„,,, ,„„ .. ..,..„,,,r.,i,.,,,_.,. : ...,._.D, c,.„.,."r'•-''.;''..Z. ":4 •-e'PS;•Cr.; '.c€'•'i -4" .'";-;-'J-." ' Filid.,,00 •_..•t '',zit',.,;„:--',,,.:;-.'',.1„-..''..4h1...',%=•=1.4.t.d. .=:-.,. • :•J'i IF.- f.fg6 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION CHEVRON/QSR SEC - N.E. 4TH STREET AND MONROE AVENUE N.E. RENTON, WASHINGTON Proposed Construction Dates: Construction will commence immediately following the date that all necessary permits are obtained from the City. We expect permits/construction to begin around July 1, 1996, with completion of the project to occur within 90 days of the start date. Clearing, grading, building/site construction and all utility work will be contiguous. Hours of Operation: Construction operations will occur between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. unless otherwise directed, and authorized, by the City. Proposed Routes: Hauling on and off site of materials will be via N.E. 4th Street as approved by the City. Approved disposal sites and materials locations will be selected by the contractor. Mitigation Measures: The site will the watered as necessary to control dust throughout construction operations. Temporary rock construction entrance(s) will be installed to prevent mud/dirt from being tracked onto public streets. An approved traffic control plan will be implemented by the contractor for work on or adjacent to public streets. A Temporary Erosion Sedimentation Control Plan(TESC Plan) will be designed for the project to mitigate the potential adverse impacts that are typical of construction activities. Noise and emissions will be limited to the short term construction and will be consistent with present vehicular traffic on N.E. 4th Street and Monroe Avenue N.E. VIN ��VG� PIJI O o f R�14 001NG o N 5660.006 [JSG/ps] ���:: ::'':::. ::::°::`:::?'::::.`::.`:::::::: <':::;' ':;:: ':> ���':� ':;::3;'.'• >`:2:��:�::: .�:::<.:::;::��:::�:`��::::::::?::?:>: '':':::'�::::::`��>'`''�?`�? �� �Wit': ': ............ E.::::::i::::;::::;>::: SW * V T STREET AND:: ( . RO:g:«:'::' <:1 OUR JOB NO. 5660 ‘V ED MARCH 15, 1996 0,4' 1 1996 OE�GLONN.��E�i PLANNING CITY OF BEN ION Prepared By: BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 1 8215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 �¢GHAVS� (206) 251 -6222 mc��2 ri)43. r CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PROJECT NARRATIVE • The proposed project consists of the redevelopment of the subject property with a new Chevron retail gasoline sales facility with a convenience store (C-store) and quick serve restaurant (QSR) (see Figure 1). New buildings would include a 49- by 85-foot (4,350 square feet) C-store building with a QSR with a 52 to 60 person seating capacity. The gasoline fueling area would include a 38-by 83-foot pump island canopy with six multi-product dispensers (MPDs). Three new underground gasoline storage tanks with 35,000 to 40,000 gallons of storage capacity would also be installed. Site development would also consist of new landscaping, paving, lot lights, and freestanding identification signs. The 17-foot high pump island canopy would be located 55 feet from N.E. 4th Street and 53 feet from Monroe Avenue. The 17-to 22-foot high C-store with QSR would be 70 feet south of the canopy (i.e., 165 feet from N.E. 4th Street) and 15 feet from Monroe Avenue N.E. One 30-foot wide full-turning movement driveway is proposed on N.E. 4th Street, 125 feet west of the intersection on Monroe Avenue N.E. A 30-foot wide, full-turning movement driveway is proposed 125 feet south of the intersection, and an "exit only" driveway is proposed approximately 100 feet (as measured centerline to centerline) south of the full-turning movement driveway. The proposed project site is located at the southwest corner of N.E. 4th Street and Monroe Avenue N.E., at 3209 N.E. 4th Street. The site measures 196 by 280 feet, for a total of approximately 1.3 acres. The site is zoned arterial commercial, CA. It is currently occupied by Alexander's Auction Storage, and is developed with a building, parking, vehicle and merchandise storage area contained within a screened fence. The site slopes gently downward toward the west. High power transmission lines traverse the western edge of the site. Uses surrounding the subject property are as follows: • To the north, across N.E. 4th Street, the site is zoned P1, public use, and is developed with a parking lot for the Renton Voc-Tech College. • To the south, the site is zoned R-10, residential, and is used for a gravel mining operation. • To the east, across Monroe Avenue N.E., the site is zoned R-8, residential, and is occupied by the Greenwood Memorial Park Cemetery. • To the west, the site is zoned CA, and is developed with a small business center housing the Renton Collision Center. VARIANCE REQUESTED Three variances are requested from the Renton City Code, Section 4-31-10.4Dla (Front Yard/Street Setback), which requires a maximum building setback of 15 feet for all buildings less than 25 feet in height. Two variances of 40 and 38 feet are requested for the pump island canopy setback from both N.E. 4th Street and Monroe Avenue N.E., respectively. Additionally, a 150-foot variance is requested for the C-store/QSR setback from N.E. 4th Street, which is situated 70 feet south of the pump island canopy. The C-store is proposed with a 15-foot setback from Monroe Avenue N.E., satisfying the building setback requirement on that frontage. Page, 1 of 4 5660.002 [BKC/es/ps] JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE CRITERIA CRITERIA"A": "That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, and location or surroundings of the subject property; and the strict application of the building and zoning code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical classification. " OUR RESPONSE: The purpose and intent of the maximum 15-foot building setback is to provide pedestrian-oriented buildings. Strict adherence to the maximum building setback for all buildings on site would create an undue hardship by significantly impacting vehicular circulation and thus preventing proper functioning of the proposed facility. The retail gasoline sales and drive-thru restaurant are clearly auto-oriented. These uses require sufficient area for vehicular maneuvering in and around the pump islands, through the drive-thru area, and for adequate circulation to the perimeter parking. Adequate circulation area is also required for the truck trailers to maneuver on site, without conflict with vehicles and/or pedestrians, to refuel the underground gasoline storage tanks. The hardship of this case is also due to the fact that this property is a corner lot, with two street frontages, thus requiring the maximum 15-foot setback from both street frontages. The following is a detailed examination of the hardships that would be created by two layouts in compliance with the maximum 15-foot setback. Scenario 1: Locating the pump island canopy within 15 feet of both street right-of-way lines would prevent vehicles from maneuvering through the pump island area(see Figure 2). There is no area between the canopy and N.E. 4th Street for cars to stack or queue; stacking/queuing for at least two vehicles (40 feet ±) is mandatory for the safe functioning of the facility. Adequate maneuvering of the gasoline truck trailers is not possible with this layout. Further, the 100-foot distance between the canopy and C-store is excessive. To walk this distance, customers will leave their cars for longer periods at the pump islands, resulting in slower turnaround of cars, potentially more congestion/stacking, and resulting in an inconvenience to customers. The canopy needs to be auto-oriented; promoting pedestrian accessibility is not beneficial. In addition to the fact that placing the canopy 15 feet from both streets would render the canopy non-functional for automobile access, this layout would never benefit or serve pedestrians, as they simply do not use the canopy. This scenario also results in no on-site landscaping between the canopy and right-of-way. This would make the activity at the canopy more imposing on pedestrians and the streetscape on both N.E. 4th Street and Monroe Avenue N.E. Scenario 2: Locating the C-store/QSR building 15 feet from both street rights-of-way and placing the canopy south of the convenience store would create severe functional problems (see Figure 3). The most critical problem with this "backwards layout" is that motorists would be unable to view into the site and thus would be prevented from making the critical decision to enter the site based upon availability of a pump island. Furthermore, motorists would be unable to judge the safety and security of entering the site. Motorists who are unable to prejudge the availability of service and/or unable to verify security prior to entering the site will not fill up at this location. This will result in a loss of business and thus place the facility at a competitive disadvantage. A second critical issue is the intensification of auto activity between the building canopy and parking area. With the"backwards layout," the building's drive-thru lane and canopy are internal to the site, with perimeter parking. Customers refueling their cars or parking on site are required to walk between the canopy area and drive-thru lane in order to enter the store. Pedestrians already on site would thus be exposed to more potential conflicts with automobiles than would exist with the proposed layout. Page 2 of 4 5660.002[BKC/es/ps] The C-store and QSR will serve some pedestrians, but will serve predominately motorists who make purchases of gasoline, convenience store items, and/or quick serve menu items from the quick serve restaurant. Thus, this hybrid facility needs to serve both on-site pedestrians and motorists without unduly compromising the functional, safety or security requirements of the facility. For this hybrid use, only one of the buildings can provide the maximum building setback from only one of the two frontage streets, as described below. As proposed, the C-store/QSR is situated 15 feet from Monroe Avenue N.E., providing an immediate pedestrian access to this frontage street. Monroe Avenue N.E. serves the R-10 zoned properties situated directly south, and the R-8 zoned properties to the southeast. Based on the adjacent residentially zoned land, it seems appropriate that the C-store is more suitable to serve pedestrians as situated. The denial of the requested variance would also deprive the facility of the rights and privileges of at least two other similar facilities on commercially zoned property in the vicinity of the subject property. One, the ARCO AM/PM at 3rd/4th and Jefferson has building setbacks of 92 feet from N.E. 3rd Street and 134 feet from N.E. 4th Street. Further, the Chevron facility proposed at North 30th Street and I-405 was granted approval of building setbacks of 65 feet for the canopy and 148 feet for the food-mart and car wash under zoning variance LUA-95-063V. CRITERIA"B": 'That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. " OUR RESPONSE: The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity. The purpose of this variance is simply to allow a logical land development for a facility that is a hybrid of predominately automobile-oriented uses; i.e., retail gasoline sales and the drive-thru restaurant. As noted, there will still be a 15-foot maximum setback from Monroe Avenue N.E. for the C-store/QSR. There will be a minimum 15-foot landscape screen along the south property line, adjacent to the residentially zoned property. This, together with the placement of the building adjacent to Monroe Avenue N.E. which serves the residentially zoned property to the south and to the southwest, makes sense for the potential of future foot traffic to this facility. All other aspects of this development will satisfy the minimum zoning standards, with respect to landscaping, parking, storm drainage management, etc. For example, the project will still be providing landscaping on all property lines as required by the City of Renton. This landscaping will assist in either buffering the subject property from adjacent land uses and/or providing an enhanced pedestrian pathway along both street frontages. Therefore, no negative or detrimental impact to the public welfare or injury to the property surrounding or in the vicinity of the subject property will occur. CRITERIA"C": 'That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. " OUR RESPONSE: The approval of the variance will not be a special privilege. All uses proposed on the subject property (retail gasoline sales, quick-serve restaurant, and retail convenience store) are permitted in the CA, Arterial Commercial zone. Relief from the maximum building setback requirement is not a grant of special privilege, rather is a grant of approval due to the unique circumstances relating to the use of the property. Approval would allow the business to not only compete fairly in the market, but also function without severe impediment. Page 3 of 4 5660.002 [BKC/es/ps] CRITERIA "D": 'That the approval, as determined by the Hearing Examiner or Board of Adjustment, is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. " OUR RESPONSE: The 41-foot relief from the maximum building setback is the minimum needed to provide relief from the City standard. As noted earlier, this proposed setback will allow the automobiles to safely enter the site and circulate without the potential for queuing onto N.E. 4th Street, to circulate in and around the pump island canopy, and to exit the facility without impediment to other motorists or pedestrians. Additionally, this setback will allow the trucks/trailers delivering fuel to the underground storage tanks to circulate safely without impediment to other motorists on site. Further, the granting of the variance for the C-store/QSR setback from the N.E. 4th Street frontage will allow this building to serve both pedestrians who may access the building from Monroe Avenue, but also serve the motorists who are purchasing gasoline at the pump island canopy and/or desiring to purchase convenience store items jointly with gas sales and/or fast-food items. • Page 4 of 4 5660.002 [BKC/es/ps] FIG. 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN NE 4th Street 30'-d ORNE'AAY 1. 125•4 \ • P/L=196,00' 7I ;t ` _ b .1i 0 } SIGN: 2 I I•I 11�F. MAX. FACE/ 3 I 9 1 4 •,� 38' 15-0'11 row ii��_= 11 ( 0 I I ()-1 G o _ , I �_ 38' X 83' 6 6 MPD CANOPY 1 °© ® •"1' 7 ii 11 I I AIR/WATER DISPENSER CAL PARKING tE _ _ ' 8 11 C 1,184 1 t] 1 p —I 1 KS Q . • 1 I PAY TELEPHONES 1 L 1� .,`1 9 I ,o1� i Ia11 III11 SIGN: I I IT b 140S.F. MAX. FACE \\ 15' HIGH / 12 I 'I illEll . g 0 1 13 i.r o I ro 111' y b W is _p ;� 35 36 37 38 39 40 0 m 15 I III O \ C \ \—` C �r o N 1r o J � N J Al U a O 15'-0' 20'-F 28 I I.. C-STORE -. • c 16 • I. CASHIERI•..•I. 16'�(1 C / r o> I 17 t•' 16 / \`• DINING -• 1 I / PROPOSED GUY ,'♦ KITCHEN OIL 1511 f/ POLE LOCATION •.* PHASE IIB / 41 1L 0 I I I — milt 22 .' 1 b 23 H n b 30 S9 %%SS / 24 25 26 27 / Y b — — —16' X 16 P/L=196.00' / TRASH ENCLOSURE / TITLE: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN: CHEVRON W/C—STORE & QSR FOR: EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION 19119 NORTH CREEK PARKWAY SUITE 101 FIG. 2 CANOPY WITH 15' SETBACKS ON BOTH STREETS NE 4th Street QUEING/STACKMG OF CARS ' [• NOT POSSIBLE INADEQUATE VEHICLE F30'-U DRNEWAY 1 •4 MANEUVEROIG AREA P/ SIGN: ;t. i �r 14OSF. MAX. FACE NO ON SITE LANDSCAPING 15' HIGH 10 0 01„1 01 0 z 36'X63' 3 I I 6 MPD CANOPY 4 0 8 15•-0' Ill0 0 ) I !le —-- • INADEQUATE MANUEVERING I ;till AREA FOR TRUCKS 6 .Q. . , 'ii • w AIR WATER DISPENSER 1' X 20' PARKING 7 I ..�.'iiiv � /YPICAL8I1/5K©`� '1PAY TELEPHONES 90151A JCE TOO FAR FOR CUSTOMER CONVENIENCE ���" AND RESULTS IN LONGER . 4,11. I 716E AT PUMPS. I - mai SIGN: 140S.F. MAX. FACE I 15' HIGH III 12 11. 10 I I .I■ —1, �I 13 tl y b I w to ` .14 - o JI6 k Z a o_ 35 36 3 38 39 40 O CO 15 I I,I a \ b C , . C C aa !... � .13 NI I Irl I _ • • �.�• N > II a O 15'-0' 1 20'-0' 28' 10 111 C-STORE C�. l'l I I �1. I IS'-d O16 I CASHIER / �III 17 • 18,/ it \1I • DINING PROPOSED GUY •:,‘ lit KITCHEN OIL 1511 POLE LOCATION .w PHASE LIB P J / 22 ' 15 I 23 "EE� N b � � t5 *SS% / 24 25 26 27 / \\\l'//, P/L=196.00' -16' X 16 / TRASH ENCLOSURE / TITLE: CANOPY WITH 15' SETBACKS ON BOTH SIDES: CHEVRON W/ C-STORE & QSR FOR: EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION 19119 NORTH CREEK PARKWAY SUITE 101 nnT,Irl I ILIA �I,•-.. . FIG. 3 'REVERSE LAYOUT . C-STORE/ OSR WITH 15' SETBACKS ON BOTH STREETS NE 4th Street BUILDING BLOCKS MOTORISTS' NEWP RITOISLANDS SITE AND PUM 31Y-0'DRIVEWAY 4'LANI,SCAPNG 135'-0' l Y • i • • i 4i b 7LS . /' • , it . ai i J: 2 ��� I OIL 1511 14 `•y' PHASE 118 KITCHEN ‘` 3 I MINK! ��1 4 <74. I � �11� _., ' ,.:. � C-STORE0 'PI20 PARKING 7 • \ \\�\ I.I l.�� B I �\ 40 39 38 Il�I 36 35 O `/ I 1 — 9 I \\\ �� 0 S S POTENTIAL CONFLICT J �• W/DRIVE THRU all 4 l HIGHER POTENTIAL Mall11 I PEDESTRIAFN/VEHICLEo CONFLICT AREA 4I• b (ALL CARS DRIVE - 12 I THROUGH THIS ARE 13 z<• �� ml w _ 4 al 3 ru 14 / 1®IeKI U ci S015 I IAI' � / 1 C \ I 101<®� 38 x 83 . j >I.I� 6 1APD CANOPY Q 10K D I i i o o 15'-0' + 20'-0* _ i_ 01 76 / CONFLICT WITH 4 17/ COCA PONE PPL SED N LOCATION a l 9 • /20 / / 21 / 22 I b I / 23 -- 'N 1:129 b 30 *SS% / 24 25 26 27 A. / -16' X 16 P%L=196.OD' — TRASH ENCLOSURE / TITLE: "REVERSE LAYOUT' C-STORE/ QSR 15' SETBACKS ON BOTH SIDES: CHEVRON W/ 'C-STORE & QSR FOR._ EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION _ 19119 NORTH CREEK PARKWAY SUITE 101 BOTHELL, WA 98011 ......,4,.:,,,.:,.,.....,..1,.,.,::i.:..:::!..!,..:.,.:!!!!!!:;:....!iiiili.::!!!!!!!!.!!!!!::::".:::..,..1:..,....,....•...:..:...:::.......:::::::.:...!::::•1:::..:...::.!..!.::.:',::.:1::::::.1!..::.:':.:.'.....!,.:;.:':,!.:i::.:1.::::.::::::::.:....::::;...::.:;.:.:.:•::::::.:.•;.,.:::.::.:..::::::...:::i. :.:.:;.:::::::::: .�:::>:::>!:::>it ROJECT.. 1IA.RRATIVE..A. 1.t ........................ .......... ........ ...:::. HE Rt .H .:> L :: I:TH':: .O VEN:: ..Ci'': `:.: : :.:.:.:T......RE.:.....U.I. .K.: R:..::E:. EST U..R..kANT::::::.::.::.:.:.:..:.:::.:.:..:.::::;.;. .. :::':>:::::>:;:> . .................. ... . k .. TH...S..TREET..J l�l.l .. .O R4 .......::> > > I:mi:<:•:::>:>:::::::: E TO .:: A H t l l.G ..: .. .. ..... . . . ................. OUR JOB NO. 5660 MARCH 15, 996 R 1 ECEIVED 1 8 7996 DEVELOPh„w;v, PLANNING Prepared By: CITY OF R�NTON BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 �GHa(iS� (206) 251 -6222 CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES r�Na�aR� PROJECT NARRATIVE The proposed project consists of the redevelopment of the subject property with a new Chevron retail gasoline sales facility with a convenience store (C-store) and quick serve restaurant (QSR) (see Figure 1). New buildings would include a 49- by 85-foot (4,350 square feet) C-store building with a QSR with a 52 to 60 person seating capacity. The gasoline fueling area would include a 38-by 83-foot pump island canopy with six multi-product dispensers (MPDs). Three new underground gasoline storage tanks with 35,000 to 40,000 gallons of storage capacity would also be installed. Site development would also consist of new landscaping, paving, lot lights, and freestanding identification signs. The 17-foot high pump island canopy would be located 55 feet from N.E. 4th Street and 53 feet from Monroe Avenue. The 17- to 22-foot high C-store with QSR would be 70 feet south of the canopy (i.e., 165 feet from N.E. 4th Street) and 15 feet from Monroe Avenue N.E. One 30-foot wide full-turning movement driveway is proposed on N.E. 4th Street, 125 feet west of the intersection on Monroe Avenue N.E. A 30-foot wide, full-turning movement driveway is proposed 125 feet south of the intersection, and an "exit only" driveway is proposed approximately 100 feet (as measured centerline to centerline) south of the full-turning movement driveway. The proposed project site is located at the southwest corner of N.E. 4th Street and Monroe Avenue N.E., at 3209 N.E. 4th Street. The site measures 196 by 280 feet, for a total of approximately 1.3 acres. The site is zoned arterial commercial, CA. It is currently occupied by Alexander's Auction Storage, and is developed with a building, parking, vehicle and merchandise storage area contained within a screened fence. The site slopes gently downward toward the west. High power transmission lines traverse the western edge of the site. Uses surrounding the subject property are as follows: • To the north, across N.E. 4th Street, the site is zoned P1, public use, and is developed with a parking lot for the Renton Voc-Tech College. • To the south, the site is zoned R-10, residential, and is used for a gravel mining operation. • To the east, across Monroe Avenue N.E., the site is zoned R-8, residential, and is occupied by the Greenwood Memorial Park Cemetery. • To the west, the site is zoned CA, and is developed with a small business center housing the Renton Collision Center. VARIANCE REQUESTED Three variances are requested from the Renton City Code, Section 4-31-10.4D la (Front Yard/Street Setback), which requires a maximum building setback of 15 feet for all buildings less than 25 feet in height. Two variances of 40 and 38 feet are requested for the pump island canopy setback from both N.E. 4th Street and Monroe Avenue N.E., respectively. Additionally, a 150-foot variance is requested for the C-store/QSR setback from N.E. 4th Street, which is situated 70 feet south of the pump island canopy. The C-store is proposed with a 15-foot setback from Monroe Avenue N.E., satisfying the building setback requirement on that frontage. Page 1 of 4 5660.002[BKC/es/ps] JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE CRITERIA CRITERIA"A": "That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, and location or surroundings of the subject property; and the strict application of the building and zoning code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical classification. " OUR RESPONSE: The purpose and intent of the maximum 15-foot building setback is to provide pedestrian-oriented buildings. Strict adherence to the maximum building setback for all buildings on site would create an undue hardship by significantly impacting vehicular circulation and thus preventing proper functioning of the proposed facility. The retail gasoline sales and drive-thru restaurant are clearly auto-oriented. These uses require sufficient area for vehicular maneuvering in and around the pump islands, through the drive-thru area, and for adequate circulation to the perimeter parking. Adequate circulation area is also required for the truck trailers to maneuver on site, without conflict with vehicles and/or pedestrians, to refuel the underground gasoline storage tanks. The hardship of this case is also due to the fact that this property is a corner lot, with two street frontages, thus requiring the maximum 15-foot setback from both street frontages. The following is a detailed examination of the hardships that would be created by two layouts in compliance with the maximum 15-foot setback. Scenario 1: Locating the pump island canopy within 15 feet of both street right-of-way lines would prevent vehicles from maneuvering through the pump island area(see Figure 2). There is no area between the canopy and N.E. 4th Street for cars to stack or queue; stacking/queuing for at least two vehicles (40 feet ±) is mandatory for the safe functioning of the facility. Adequate maneuvering of the gasoline truck trailers is not possible with this layout. Further, the 100-foot distance between the canopy and C-store is excessive. To walk this distance, customers will leave their cars for longer periods at the pump islands, resulting in slower turnaround of cars,potentially more congestion/stacking, and resulting in an inconvenience to customers. The canopy needs to be auto-oriented; promoting pedestrian accessibility is not beneficial. In addition to the fact that placing the canopy 15 feet from both streets would render the canopy non-functional for automobile access, this layout would never benefit or serve pedestrians, as they simply do not use the canopy. This scenario also results in no on-site landscaping between the canopy and right-of-way. This would make the activity at the canopy more imposing on pedestrians and the streetscape on both N.E. 4th Street and Monroe Avenue N.E. Scenario 2: Locating the C-store/QSR building 15 feet from both street rights-of-way and placing the canopy south of the convenience store would create severe functional problems (see Figure 3). The most critical problem with this "backwards layout" is that motorists would be unable to view into the site and thus would be prevented from making the critical decision to enter the site based upon availability of a pump island. Furthermore, motorists would be unable to judge the safety and security of entering the site. Motorists who are unable to prejudge the availability of service and/or unable to verify security prior to entering the site will not fill up at this location. This will result in a loss of business and thus place the facility at a competitive disadvantage. A second critical issue is the intensification of auto activity between the building canopy and parking area. With the"backwards layout," the building's drive-thru lane and canopy are internal to the site, with perimeter parking. Customers refueling their cars or parking on site are required to walk between the canopy area and drive-thru lane in order to enter the store. Pedestrians already on site would thus be exposed to more potential conflicts with automobiles than would exist with the proposed layout. Page 2 of 4 5660.002[BKC/es/ps] The C-store and QSR will serve some pedestrians,but will serve predominately motorists who make purchases of gasoline, convenience store items, and/or quick serve menu items from the quick serve restaurant. Thus, this hybrid facility needs to serve both on-site pedestrians and motorists without unduly compromising the functional, safety or security requirements of the facility. For this hybrid use, only one of the buildings can provide the maximum building setback from only one of the two frontage streets, as described below. As proposed, the C-store/QSR is situated 15 feet from Monroe Avenue N.E., providing an immediate pedestrian access to this frontage street. Monroe Avenue N.E. serves the R-10 zoned properties situated directly south, and the R-8 zoned properties to the southeast. Based on the adjacent residentially zoned land, it seems appropriate that the C-store is more suitable to serve pedestrians as situated. The denial of the requested variance would also deprive the facility of the rights and privileges of at least two other similar facilities on commercially zoned property in the vicinity of the subject property. One, the ARCO AM/PM at 3rd/4th and Jefferson has building setbacks of 92 feet from N.E. 3rd Street and 134 feet from N.E. 4th Street. Further, the Chevron facility proposed at North 30th Street and I-405 was granted approval of building setbacks of 65 feet for the canopy and 148 feet for the food-mart and car wash under zoning variance LUA-95-063V. CRITERIA"B":: 'That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. " OUR RESPONSE: The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity. The purpose of this variance is simply to allow a logical land development for a facility that is a hybrid of predominately automobile-oriented uses; i.e., retail gasoline sales and the drive-thru restaurant. As noted, there will still be a 15-foot maximum setback from Monroe Avenue N.E. for the C-store/QSR. There will be a minimum 15-foot landscape screen along the south property line, adjacent to the residentially zoned property. This, together with the placement of the building adjacent to Monroe Avenue N.E. which serves the residentially zoned property to the south and to the southwest, makes sense for the potential of future foot traffic to this facility. All other aspects of this development will satisfy the minimum zoning standards, with respect to landscaping, parking, storm drainage management, etc. For example, the project will still be providing landscaping on all property lines as required by the City of Renton. This landscaping will assist in either buffering the subject property from adjacent land uses and/or providing an enhanced pedestrian pathway along both street frontages. Therefore, no negative or detrimental impact to the public welfare or injury to the property surrounding or in the vicinity of the subject property will occur. CRITERIA"C": 'That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. " OUR RESPONSE: The approval of the variance will not be a special privilege. All uses proposed on the subject property (retail gasoline sales, quick-serve restaurant, and retail convenience store) are permitted in the CA, Arterial Commercial zone. Relief from the maximum building setback requirement is not a grant of special privilege, rather is a grant of approval due to the unique circumstances relating to the use of the property. Approval would allow the business to not only compete fairly in the market, but also function without severe impediment. Page 3 of 4 5660.002 [BKC/es/ps] CRITERIA "D": 'That the approval, as determined by the Hearing Examiner or Board of Adjustment, is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. " OUR RESPONSE: The 41-foot relief from the maximum building setback is the minimum needed to provide relief from the City standard. As noted earlier, this proposed setback will allow the automobiles to safely enter the site and circulate without the potential for queuing onto N.E. 4th Street, to circulate in and around the pump island canopy, and to exit the facility without impediment to other motorists or pedestrians. Additionally, this setback will allow the trucks/trailers delivering fuel to the underground storage tanks to circulate safely without impediment to other motorists on site. Further, the granting of the variance for the C-store/QSR setback from the N.E. 4th Street frontage will allow this building to serve both pedestrians who may access the building from Monroe Avenue, but also serve the motorists who are purchasing gasoline at the pump island canopy and/or desiring to purchase convenience store items jointly with gas sales and/or fast-food items. Page 4 of 4 5660.002[BKC/es/ps] FIG. 1 • PROPOSED S1 E PLAN NE 4th Street 30'-0'DRNEWAY _I. 125'-0' / I P/L=196,00' T 1 - it \ b ____.,-) 1.1) 0 __.... 1 II / II SIGN: -- 1 MAX. FACE 2, - 15' HIGH 3 I 434-0 . {, 38 15-0' b 7. gi _ , l — — — -- - 1110 II C C fit I - 6 I !_! I L 6 MPD CANOPY II 1 AIR/WATER DISPENSER PARKING I I 1�SK©• ® p` I I PAY TELEPHONES — IV llliii li i `1 �� 9— I I J__I_ 1 1 �1IQI_I SIGN: I bY 140S.F. MAX. FACE l 15' HIGH \ 12 I I I 1��.11 O r / InI W 3 ��k y—i \=I t Z J I § 14 \ 39 \, e o ,�� a 35 36 37 38 \ 39 40 \ d m 15 I I,I O b C \-- `/\ ,r b •• o y I I Irl • $ > 11'0 Q 11 ■ L. 15'-0' 1 20'-0r__ 28) I �r C-STORE m .. _ j CASHIER` ,{. 15'-0' i 16 / I 'I. . 17/ I IIP"Cli r DINING r.0' \fir' I I 16/7 PROPOSED GUY +,♦ KRCHEN OIL 1511 • 9 POLE LOCATION \\!�` ' PHASE IIB /20 \*/<� �JIL/ / 21 / 22 113 23 / I I \ 29 b 30 SI 1 b oiSS / '^ 24 25 26 27 / I 15' -16' X 16 P/L=196.00' — / TRASH ENCLOSURE / TITLE: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN: / CHEVRON W/C—STORE & QSR FOR: EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION 19119 NORTH CREEK PARKWAY SUITE 101 • FIG. 2 • CANOPY WITH 15' SETBACKS ON BOTH STREETS NE 4th Street QUEING/SUCKING OF CARS NOT POSSIBLE INADEQUATE VEIGCIE L 30'-d DRIVEWAY I 123.. MANEUVERING AREA ` I P/L=196,00' SIGN: 4t 1 1405.F. MAX. r 15' HIGH FACE _-I NO ON SITE LANDSCAPING mm i�l I r t, - - - - 1 2 I��► 3 I . 0 i I ; i C 4:i, Q 38' X 83 I 6 MPD CANOPY 4 ) L 13 0 O O 15'-0 — — INADEQUATEFORTRUCKS MANUEVERING AREA f 6 7 L/^I G. `.. T' X 20' PARKING — AIR/WATER DISPENSER PICAL 8 I - 15K©. zi, / T--------1----- Y PAY TELEPHONES mg 9 I DISTANCE TOO FAR FOR CUSTOMER CONVENIENCE ',aAND RESULTS IN LONGER . i■(Lii TIME AT PUMPS. o #1-IUII I SIGN: 140S.F. MAX. FACE I I 15' HIGH 12 ! 1 1:11 I I cI \ 13 I I� W 14 trii b co 1�1'-0'�. 35 36 3 35 3 4!\'.. \ C15 I ,I ' \ b o 4.)C I 11 oCO > Q 15'O _I 20-0' f 2/0. II g C-STORE ` I a OC CASHIER — 16 17 I l i DINING \4- - . / PROPOSED GUY .;-• KITCHEN OIL 1511 X/ POLE LOCATION s.'4PHASE IIB %. IOWA' 21 / 22 7g1:7: 23 ., 111•21;b 30 / a7,y1 24 25 26 27 ..)- %%SS / — I \\~//, X P/L=196.00' —16' 16 — / TRASH ENCLOSURE / TITLE: CANOPY WITH 15' SETBACKS ON BOTH SIDES: CHEVRON W/ C—STORE & QSR FOR: EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION 19119 NORTH CREEK PARKWAY SUITE 101 ROTHFI I WA QRf111 FICA. 3 'REVERSE LAYOUT' • C-STORE/ OSR WITH 15' SETBACKS ON BOTH STREETS NE 4th Street BUILDING BLOCKS MOTORISTS' NEW INTO S1IE AND PUMP ISLANDS r30'D DRIVEWAY 4'LANDSCAPING ,35'-0- P/L=196.00' r.► IS 7xnk), 2 OIL 1511 �r PHASE LIB KITCHEN • 3 ONINIO O 'i1 • 4 ‹.04.)\ _____i It ,,, IE• �IIIy= 'J C-STORE at e lit n .. .. �.�4.... ,5-T1 X 20' PARKING \�c':"'f C /I I��II 8 PICAL I \ 40 39\ 38 Ill1f 36 35 O 41I I 9 V \' �= 0 s� POTENTIAL CONFLICT I :T;;;:;\\ �I W/DRIVE THRU 11 I HIGHER POTENTIAL PEDESTRIAN/VEHICLE CONFLICT AREA MO (ALL CARS DRIVE y b 12 I ;THROUGH MIS AREA .P of 13 , i,�,/ �_1_ N I _ � — u,,,, ., w �I o 74 ® ©15K A i i itg Z a m r 15 I V v.® ED — —..i . '1i1' l� II II . tllt 6 MPD CANOPY I Q 110K I L. I 0 16 / o c CONFLICT WITF, 1 / PSTX.PROPOSED I GUY POLE LOCATION 18/ al • // 9 / 20 21 / 22 IT �J 23 1— n "� .� % 30 I \ / - %%SS 24 25 26 27 / -_ b / -16' X 16 P/L=196.00' — -" TRASH ENCLOSURE / TITLE: "REVERSE LAYOUT' C-STORE/ QSR 15' SETBACKS ON BOTH SIDES: CHEVRON W/ C-STORE & QSR FOR: EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION _ 19119 NORTH CREEK PARKWAY SUITE 101 BOTHELL, WA 98011 PREPARED FOR MCDONALD'S CORPORATION S. Dou las S. Lynnewo�.w � t ff neer ,�� ob t S. Levinson, P. 4flg1 Principal 'WONfiaA44 EXPIRES 03/07/'I(0 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT NORTHEAST 4TH STREET AND MONROE AVENUE NORTHEAST RENTON, WASHINGTON E-6505 April 27, 1994 Earth Consultants, Inc. 1805 - 136th Place Northeast, Suite 101 Bellevue, Washington 98005 (206) 643-3780 222 East 26th Street, Suite 103 Tacoma, Washington 98411-9998 (206) 272-6608 • • �� Earth Con . `'/( 1 i `,� Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists&Environmesultantsntal ScIncientists April 27, 1994 E-6505 McDonald's Corporation 10220 Northeast Points Drive, Suite 300 Kirkland, Washington 98033-7865 Attention: Ms. Nancy L. Heck • • Dear Ms. Heck: We are pleased to submit our report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed McDonald's Restaurant, Northeast 4th Street and Monroe Avenue Northeast, Renton, Washington." This report presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratory tests, and engineering analysis, as well as geotechnically related recommendations for the proposed site development. The purpose and scope of our • study was outlined in our March 18, 1994 proposal. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the above referenced site, it is our opinion that the proposed restaurant may be supported by shallow spread footings provided that the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into the construction specifications. If you or your consultants have any questions about the content of this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please call. Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. • Ro ert S. Levinson, P. E. • President DSL/RSL/kml [6505GES.Rpt] 1805.136th Place N.E., Suite 201, Bellevue,Washington 98005 • _ 222 E. 26th Street, Suite 103, Tacoma,Washington 98421-9998 • Bellevue(206)643-3780 Seattle(206)464-1584 FAX(206)746-0860 Tacoma(206)272-6608 TABLE OF CONTENTS E-6505 PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Project Description 1 SITE CONDITIONS 1 Surface 1 Subsurface 2 Groundwater 2 Laboratory Testing 2 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 General 3 Site Preparation and Grading 3 Foundations 4 Slab-on-Grade Floors 5 Seismic Design Considerations 5 Lateral Resistance 6 Excavations and Slopes 6 Site Drainage 7 Erosion Potential 7 Utility Support and Backfill 8 Pavement Areas 8 LIMITATIONS 9 Additional Services 9 APPENDICES Appendix A Field Exploration Appendix B Laboratory Testing ILLUSTRATIONS • Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Boring Location Plan Plate 3 Typical Utility Trench Backfill Plate Al Legend Plates A2 through A5 Boring Logs Plate B1 Grain Size Analysis Earth Conauhanta,Inc. ( TECHNICAL ENGINEERING STU._ . PROPOSED MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT NORTHEAST 4TH STREET AND MONROE AVENUE NORTHEAST RENTON, WASHINGTON E-6505 INTRODUCTION General This report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study for the proposed McDonald's Restaurant, Renton, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1. The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site and, based on the conditions encountered,to provide geotechnical recommendations for the proposed site development. Project Description At the time our study was performed, the site, proposed structure, and exploratory locations were approximately as shown on the Boring Location Plan, Plate 2. Based on the preliminary plans provided to us, we understand that the site is to be developed with a one-level restaurant in the central portion of the parcel. The remainder of the area is to be asphalt paved parking areas and landscaping areas. Grade modifications are not anticipated to exceed one foot based on site topography and adjacent grades. Structural loading is anticipated to fall within the following ranges, including maximum dead plus live loads: • Wall footings - 2-3 kips per lineal foot • Maximum column loads - 50 kips • Slab loads - 150 pounds per square foot (psf) If the above design criteria are incorrect or change, we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this report. In any case, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final construction design. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The site of the proposed facility is located at the northwest corner of the Northeast 4th Street and Monroe Avenue Northeast intersection in Renton, Washington (see Plate 1, Vicinity Map). The rectangular parcel encompasses about one and one-quarter (1 .25) acres. At the time of our exploration, the site was bounded to the north by light industrial metal frame structures, to the east by Northeast 4th Avenue, to the south by Monroe Avenue Northeast and to the west by an abandoned sand and Earth Consultants. Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGIN' LING STUDY McDonald's Corporation E-6505 April 27, 1994 Page 2 gravel pit. The ground surface is flat and level with no visible drainage gradient. The site is presently occupied by Alexander's Auction House. On the west property line, a slope with an inclination of about 1 H:1 V has a height of about fifty feet and drains to the west. At the time of the exploration, erosion gullies and light vegetation was observed on the slope. It appears the site surface drains over this slope. Subsurface The site was explored by drilling four borings at the approximate locations shown on Plate 2. Detailed descriptions of the conditions encountered at each location explored are presented on the boring logs, Plates A2 through.A5. A description of the field exploration methods is included in Appendix A. Below is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. In general, the surface is underlain by about one to six feet of loose to dense surface layer of brown silty sand with gravel (Unified Soil Classification SM) overlying a medium dense to dense, brown poorly graded sand with gravel (Unified Soil Classification SP). The poorly graded sand was observed to the maximum exploration depth of sixteen and one-half (16.5) feet. The upper layer, which may be fill, thickens to the south with the maximum depth encountered at the south end of the proposed building. Groundwater Groundwater seepage was not observed in any of the borings during the time our site study was performed. It is important to note that groundwater seepage is not constant; thus, one may expect fluctuations in the volume and location depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, groundwater seepage is greater during the wetter winter months (typically October through May). Groundwater seepage is not expected to have a significant impact on construction unless the site is developed during periods of heavy precipitation. Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or modify the field soil classification of the units encountered and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering characteristics of the soils encountered. Visual classifications were supplemented by index tests, such as sieve analysis, and by moisture content tests on representative samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual boring log or on a separate data sheet contained in Appendix B. Earth Consultants. Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGh RING STUDY McDonald's Corporation E-6505 April 27, 1994 Page 3 However, it is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions; our geotechnical recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results. • The soil samples for this project will be discarded after a period of fifteen (15) days following completion of this report, unless we are otherwise directed in writing. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion that the site can be developed generally as planned provided the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into the final design. In our opinion, the proposed restaurant may be supported on spread footings bearing on at least one foot of structural fill or on u' competent native soil. Some overexcavation of the loose soil may be necessary depending on the actual conditions exposed in the foundation excavations. The `1 existing west slope appears stable in its present configuration. The shallow erosion gullies appear to be due to runoff from the site freely flowing from the slope. Further erosion of the slope can be reduced by diverting surface runoff over the slope and vegetating the slope surface. These and other geotechnically related aspects of the project are discussed in the following sections of this report. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area for - the exclusive use of the McDonald's Corporation and their representatives. No warranty is expressed or implied. It is recommended that this report, in its entirety, be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. Site Preparation and Grading Construction areas should be stripped and cleared of all existing vegetation, demolition debris, and any other deleterious materials. Stripped organic materials should not be mixed with any soils to be used as structural fill. Following the stripping, clearing and demolition procedures,the earthwork operations can commence to provide the design grades. Surfaces where fill, foundations or pavements are to be placed should be proofrolled. All proofrolling should be performed under the observation of a representative of ECI. Where soils are disturbed during demolition of the existing building and are to support the new structure or pavement, the soil should be recompacted to the requirements of structural fill. Soil in any loose or soft areas, if recompacted and still excessively yielding,should be overexcavated and replaced with structural fill to a depth that will provide a stable base. Earth Consultants. Inc. • • GEOTECHNICAL ENGui RING STUDY McDonald's Corporation E-6505 April 27, 1994 Page 4 The surface soil layer encountered in our borings is moderately moisture sensitive due to its fines content. As such, in an exposed condition it may become disturbed from normal construction activity especially when in a wet or saturated condition. Once disturbed, and in a wet condition, it will be unsuitable for support of foundations or pavements. Therefore, during construction where this soil is exposed and will support new structures, care must be exercised not to disturb its condition. If disturbed conditions develop, the affected soil must be removed and replaced with a structural fill. The depth of removal will be dependent on the level of disturbance developed during construction. Structural fill is defined as any compacted fill placed under foundations, roadways, slabs, pavements, or any other load-bearing areas. Structural fill under foundations should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum 90 percent of its maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near the optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum density, except for the top twelve (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. Lab tests of the soils expected to be exposed in excavations indicate a moisture content in the range of 2.5 to 6.0 percent. With a fines content of 14 percent and less, these soils appear suitable for use as structural fill with the addition of water in order to bring the moisture to near optimum. Structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a granular material with a maximum size of three inches and no more than 5 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve, based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction. During dry weather, most compactible non-organic soil can be used as structural fill. It is recommended that any structural fill planned for on site use be submitted for approval prior to import. Foundations Based on the encountered subsurface soil conditions, preliminary design criteria, and assuming compliance with the preceding "Site Preparation and Grading" section, the proposed restaurant may be supported on competent native soil or at least one foot of structural fill, depending upon encountered conditions and final grades. Overexcavation of the native soil may be necessary should loose soil conditions be encountered in foundation excavations. A determination regarding overexcavation must be made at the time the foundation excavations are made. Foundations may be Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGIN ING STUDY McDonald's Corporation E-6505 April 27, 1994 Page 5 designed for an allowable bearing capacity of twenty-five hundred (2,500) pounds per square foot (psf). Footings should be at least twelve (12) inches in width and extend to a depth of at least eighteen (18) inches below the lowest adjacent finished subgrade or interior floor slab surface. The above allowable soil bearing values are for dead plus live loads and may be increased one-third for combined dead, live, wind, and seismic forces. It is estimated that total and differential settlements for the relatively light structure will be approximately one-half and one-quarter inch, respectively. It is recommended that all footing excavations be observed by a representative of ECI, prior to placing forms or rebar, to verify that exposed soil conditions are as anticipated in this.report, and/or provide suitable modifications in the design, as required. The majority of the anticipated settlement should occur during construction as the dead loads are applied. Slab-on-Grade Floors Slab-on-grade floors may be supported on recompacted native soil or structural fill, depending on final grades. Should loose soil be present at the slab subgrade elevation, it should be compacted to the requirements of structural fill. Any disturbed subgrade soil must either be re-compacted or replaced with structural fill. The slab should be provided with a minimum of four inches of free-draining sand or gravel. In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, a vapor barrier such as a 6-mil plastic membrane may be placed beneath the slab. Two inches of damp sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. Seismic Design Considerations The Puget Sound region is classified as Zone 3 by the Uniform Building Code (UBC). The largest earthquakes in the Sound region have been subcrustal events, ranging in depth from 50 to 70 kilometers. Such deep events have exhibited no surface faulting. The UBC earthquake regulations contain a static force procedure and a dynamic force procedure for design base shear calculations. Based on the encountered soil conditions, it is our opinion that a site coefficient of 1 .2 should be used for the static force procedure, as outlined in Section 2334 of the 1991 UBC. For the dynamic force procedure outlined in Section 2335 of the 1991 UBC, the curve for Rock and Stiff Soils (soil type 1) should be used on Figure 23-3, Normalized Response Spectra Shapes. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGI vl ING STUDY McDonald's Corporation E-6505 April 27, 1994 Page 6 Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement for structures with foundations founded in the liquefying soils. Groundshaking of sufficient duration results in the loss of grain to grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave as a fluid for short periods of time. To have potential*for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with a grain size distribution of a specified range (generally sands and silt); it must be loose to medium-dense; it must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of groundshaking. It is our opinion that the liquefaction potential at the site is negligible due to the relative density of the soils encountered and the absence of a near-surface groundwater table. Lateral Resistance An allowable passive pressure value against the sides of foundation slabs or other subsurface foundation elements of three hundred (300) psf per foot of depth may be used for design. In order to fully mobilize the passive pressure, the foundations must be poured "neat" against the adjacent soil or the foundation excavation must be backfilled with structural fill. Friction between the base of foundations and the underlying soil may be assumed to be 40 percent of the dead load. The friction and passive pressure design values include a factor of safety of 1 .5. Excavations and Slopes You should be aware that in no case should the excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and federal safety regulations. As described in the current Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations,the native soils would classify as Type "B". Therefore temporary cuts greater than four feet in height, should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than 1 H:1 V. If slopes of this inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, or if excavations greater than twenty (20) feet in depth are required, temporary shoring may be necessary. This shoring would help protect against slope or excavation collapse, and would provide protection to workmen in the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide shoring design criteria, if requested. All permanent slopes should be inclined no greater than 2H:1V. If this inclination cannot be maintained, we should be contacted to review the design and construction criteria. We also recommend that all cut slopes be examined by Earth Consultants, Inc. during excavation to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed, if needed,to improve the stability, including flattening of slopes or installation of drainage. In any case, water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any slopes. • Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGlwls ,:NG STUDY McDonald's Corporation E-6505 April 27, 1994 Page 7 The above information has been provided solely as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should the above information be interpreted to mean that this office is assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. Site Drainage Groundwater seepage was not encountered in any of the borings during the time our site study was performed. It does not appear that groundwater levels will present any construction related problems while excavating the foundations. However, if groundwater seepage is encountered in any excavations during construction, the bottom of the excavation should be sloped to one or more shallow sump pits. The collected water can then be pumped from these pits to a positive and permanent discharge, such as a nearby storm drain. Depending on the magnitude of such seepage, it may also be necessary to interconnect the sump pits by a system of connector trenches. It is recommended that the appropriate locations of subsurface drains, if needed, be established during grading operations by this office, at which time the seepage areas, if present, may be more clearly defined. The site should be graded such that surface water is directed off the site. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where structures, slabs or driveways are to be constructed. During construction, loose surfaces should be sealed at night by compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils. Final site grades should allow for drainage away from the structure's foundations. The ground should be sloped at a gradient of three percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the structures in landscape areas. 4- Erosion Potential During the site exploration, deep erosion gullies.were obse droi the slopw�est/of the property. This slope drains to the west)from the west roperty line at an P Y inclination of about 1 H:1 V. Slope height is about fifty (5 et. In our opinion, the rate .of erosion is less than one inch per year. This rate can be reduced by controlling surface water and estab ing a ' get"wive cover on the slope. Surface water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of the slope. In order to further reduce the rate of erosion, commend the s e be Ipred with a mixture of deep and shallow rooted vegetation. More specific recommenda i an b-e-provVidci ed by a landscape architect fog permanent vegetative cover of the slope. ( ) Cam.. et2 GEOTECHNICAL ENGIIVt,__ NG STUDY McDonald's Corporation E-6505 April 27, 1994 Page 8 Utility Support and Backfill ' Based on the soil conditions encountered, the soils expected to be exposed by utility excavations should provide-adequate support for utilities. Utility trench backfill is a major concern in preventing settlement along utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility line be adequately • supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped to ensure support is provided around the pipe haunches. Fill should be carefully placed and hand tamped to about twelve (12) inches above the crown of the pipe before any heavy compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench backfill should be placed in lifts having a loose thickness of less than twelve (12) inches. A typical trench backfill section and compaction requirements for load supporting and non-load supporting areas is presented on Plate 3. Pavement Areas The adequacy of site pavements is related in part to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To provide a properly prepared subgrade for pavements, we recommend the subgrade be treated and prepared as described in the Site Preparation of this report. This means at least the top twelve (12) inches of the subgrade should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density (per ASTM 1557-78). It is possible that some localized areas of soft, wet or unstable subgrade may still exist after this process. Therefore, a greater thickness of structural fill or crushed rock may be needed to stabilize these localized areas. We recommend the following pavement section for lightly loaded areas: • Two inches of Asphalt Concrete (AC) over four inches of Crushed Rock Base (CRB) material, or • Two inches of AC over three inches of Asphalt Treated Base (ATB) material. Heavier truck-traffic areas will require thicker sections depending upon site usage, pavement life and site traffic. As a general rule, you may consider for truck-trafficked areas the following sections: • Three inches of AC over six inches of CRB, or • Three inches of AC over four inches of ATB. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGII _,RING STUDY McDonald's Corporation E-6505 April 27, 1994 Page 9 Asphalt Concrete (AC), Asphalt Treated Base (ATB), and Crushed Rock Base (CRB) materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. All rock base should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the ASTM D-1557-78 laboratory test standard. It should be noted that parking stall pavement sections assume no truck traffic. LIMITATIONS Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the design information provided to us by you, and our experience and engineering judgement. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied. The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the borings. Soil and groundwater conditions between borings may vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory locations may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be requested to re-evaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. Additional Services This office will be available to provide consultation services relating to review of the final design and specifications to verify that our recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the approved construction plans and specifications. In addition, it is suggested that this office be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction to observe compliance with the design concepts and project specifications, and to facilitate design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. It should be noted that it is generally in the best interests of the owner/client to maintain the same Soils Engineer during construction in order to obtain the project objective, with optimum quality control. • Earth Consultants, Inc. 4JIIIIPJ - s_ -mcl .. -.•� ..� �• � © : - NE �6TN � PL> I< n r z Y`NE1�Rxm I I�y1( NNE ° •I xGR/ W����.,� /,}1�,.% s >,� ' � ` 6RK/ P9U� `' MIYA�Oa YIMOSd n.•L I� :::/// y < I���„ `N 4tx sT 900: �� xrr a NE ,,,� < NE 3R0 PL g C N AIRPo!roRt W In Alr rum I SE RT WY 4�� '6 � 3 HE 2xD 5T 1 S TILLICISI ST w : ��ii er�ar777 NE -- 'W NE L'-- - _SE__ • *'. 5 TOB1H. TS7uElP1 Jr"� ® bNrat •!'' MO t`, x w; :rla S`Si TosIA; _ M a L PONT . T. ITE LOCATION ���r't � 1 T IRENIDN In arm H I.la co- 4• 3 cocoa. I sE =, S 2ND ' STT v ' eS r 6. 'uSTN � '"_ _S 3RD ; ����g ©e 169 g SE I st 0ril.i, `, r s s S •' 4.411110a �� ��RENTO g5® \ REENT ER i.. <pr�J�®®© 'all, pdo AA).�'9� RD SE 5TH \ s' '" ' _ / B d' r?� kn''arA I.seg�pP .4 fr AR +�< ♦ g Q 1 ®1< s 6TH ST RR 'k ,sue L-- I $E 1 `?• ,�? H 5 6TH ST sr ' MN srs �� % :e74 Ii1DlE1K1OD S�4 -d .", , N ST \\\\h GOLF I .rst --- -I�fOE �. .515 ST--Awto.. SE PL ---- - , in COURSE IN °V S REN 4.1 ION VILLAGE PI.,,,,,-- S MB ST .S7••�,1�� `f�4R Rio � ,gMQP LEW00D . ., ;' . ST • is A-tNark J 1 i61 T. 1 e W. ,._ sC • ISM .i.• < a C e FCP4r oGc 4_N . K, • s b \ s<? i ST `• 4 y,y,� N S 16T11 ST s, s e x �y Y. QtlSE•'• y 16.� •k , al ... ~ \ K • vn N K _ $ N N yT 00. 4, t 16TNC =: • y f•1TL �K? CtN. > R t $ qy� +� n \• 7 •J •i 1 Taa ?<A N nIN % ST +I' ..... ni.•r 4 -r4 sr I 7i I 97H sr ' In NI /ME A I T!� • ' S 19TN 5T tA[BOT 1 _-1I/eM n 0 S !'A.iy sr s sE Ivre sr- y - , ut IT E St I s O ----' If G s xlLL o urlT '. rysr 4' , nnur nr .�• �b,4 �S4 \rt--"-•II Iz"list PAAx.I t S PUGET F4. o cNy' t�� w r ��"n@u6ftn,mu � x7:<1ST ��� .. i1R vb1 a,rda° v. uF 4. h'+.n `� I_ 'DS'�R Cis TV E -K x Y:I__ �r 1• W 6TY, 4.` ] , I FA'IRWOOD A IStP 'F• 'tl5E •R �' RI 5_ 23RD ST i s�'' I 'r' r--—-- rrsl,� W >< �� ',Fre TN Ssr 41-K 169n Pt L-- VICTORIA >< 8 S I -, I�J .i `1 i SE 1�5T ST �l9 sE�I615T SL 16arN�F�I sE 159�6~ ' w \ 162ND ST s6tsrnsE <�<=�• ,c Is b: �n s[telsr :lsc t6orN L 9 7,2 SE' sbarr- st a s'._�4 -.-_. Q -. - sm., ffQ "LT _� Q SE 1635D ST- 1? g �Y.. ST . Jt . �"p 3t t 4.'r; lei 'S' .3!T ice, d;,° ¢ Y SE 1GATH_^ ^_5T SE 164TH' I - E: u N FNE _ 4r$ 4 F-rib ��'r A .11. {ST -IN 1.' JoIC_� a J<'l 1 R. a [ N ," S �'� 0� ST m` II ' S Sem-sr: ..SE 1651H 5•tQ SE 165TH ST K'k 16SIN s'SE 164TH ,:`si - '��6 m=': .+r y1• a I < > sT f -' S v ' bs6 fir SE I66TN Sr Sl SE r n'' • -n '0 , K j79rx sr < _� ona' :ps,"'n.0 r lY FAlRNM 1 ,`p+�,:S.M�,�S; R ,t4 S[I6>TN St i�S[,^^o 1661N Pl.i, Irr'f`� / SC 1671N Sl "' I wD { .{ 4 TS•V. ET > an W 1 < ti 1` 67IN,� < /Jr n maim �"' - 1 1ST Ci `- w Cn $ 2 a St VIA St E h 76Tr • SE 1661H PL 31ST ST ISC SE < < -• SE _� N x «168TH '^ =1 = ST vt vWi a a ,I6HTN PI CT�1697N ��j 'W�' `S[]¢9TH ST " n F N 169M eT. - ^ SE 169TN 'f r6y <r s\. •s '^ �s^17Sr _ . I69N'EI_ - 1E SE 170TH ST r T7 "c 1NM Pl. •F r 4 W _ _-i__ L ``1`Y R w e sE 170TH S. H %1- i ,7\}�--- ' < ' y I. ' i _ o Q �� ST 21•� _ • 'Jr: �-• ¢ w'\'iy5(I711TH sr rA'J RENTON '�� "�i • ST , I- • SL�SS.SE I , >t[ 5t ' SE `172ND < S x ISsst ,vARE _ 7� 4 LIB S 1r ST E5r N �N < y `!s�$ •-'SE 1724 ST.•.• Q�N =SE 7 H.. PL a ST SE PL • SI -r u u !a • x ��7 tid•`,•4T f .. S< rrlAY.'..". SE ..• a. .SE 17IST:r FL. sE nv • __ ]rM: {„`17ATN ST .¢�l7Nn ST 177R0 _<,; ._ < R K:IT71U ` I. ' s as N� T�- ;S ^ 'y^�' \ PE �x��'N'' m s� i`Pt `f ^`v. / cr• f s f SE sE vSTx :+ O Av sc SE "" RpVISSYl� kl,,PPI s S '!3 , . �( •'1 176TH ST =� -.r -T' LSE 176TN S7., PES s� a VALLEY I Ri - 'P 4 .r~. SI :I +1 zra g .,1,, I< . .1 IrQrx 0 R3 Reference: King County/ Map 656 By Thomas Brothers Maps Dated 1992 Rio; .p‘: Ok‘ Vicinity Map /Y I1 Earth Consultants Inc. McDonald's Restaurant �III�/ ���J �1Yr/ a E7IVIIElE1fnesitBI SCk71ELSLS Renton, Washington Proj. No. 6505 I Drwn. GLS I Date Apr. '94 Checked DSL I Date 4/22/94 I Plate 1 N.E. 4th STREET _* B-1 1 B-2 I 111 w ' ; B3 Q I tI - W O CC Z • 0 M -.- ' B-4 j Trash (Enclosure 1---] \ LEGEND ID B-1 4- Approximate Location of K ECI Boring, Proj. No. E-6505, Apr. 1994 Approximate Scale liliiiiCEINCI 0 30 60 120ft. Proposed Building EllReference: Existing Building Preliminary Site Plan By McDonald's Corp. Dated 2/17/94 h; E��: al► Boring Location Plan 1 jIy $? I Earth Consultants Inc. McDonald's Restaurant 1�Ii�� 11//��r�/ ceaedin I E�,strx�rs &Environma lal s+,uk�s Renton, Washington Proj. No. 6505 I Drwn. GLS I Date Apr. '94 Checked DSL I Date. 4/22/94 I Plate 2 Non-Load Supporting Floor Slab or Areas Roadway Areas Ill _ 11,I 4 I A• -: o ° °° ° ° Varies `b 000 95 o ° o. l.';4.... Q. •85� 1 Foot Minimum n'imum •4. B 'a kfill c - ':fir •r!S•i - . iit7:ii ..iar:..:it•ri..i' .7•ti,-••,Svu e''i_7•:. nr.•� Varies - Wit:: •?•i':: :Y'.. - .::k::;tit<:•. Bedding R°0Oo'0:c4• •• ••b"°•a0�4C o.¢..•°':•0: .°;* 0•••bd •••• Varies LEGEND: Asphalt or Concrete Pavement or Concrete Floor Slab °•° Goo., . o , Base Material or Base Rock Backfill; Compacted On-Site Soil or Imported Select Fill Material as Described in the Site Preparation of the General Earthwork Section Of the Attached Report Text. • 95 Minimum Percentage of Maximum Laboratory Dry Density as Determined by ASTM Test Method D 1557-78 (Modified Proctor), Unless Otherwise Specified in the Attached Report Text. �..•�.o.Y,�� Bedding Material; Material Type Depends on Type of Pipe and •°o,9°°i0• Laying Conditions. Bedding Should Conform to the Manufacturers �° - Recommendations for the Type of Pipe Selected. /A; •i\\ 4$\ _ TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH FILL Earth Consultan Inc. McDonald's Restaurant J/ IriJ %j Gede etnkal Fsgtrtters Ge°Og S&ESl rpunrnlnts.•N Sfk tSLS Renton, Washington Proj. No. 6505 I Drwn. GLS 'Date Apr. '94 Checked DSL 1 Date 4/22/94 [Plate 3 APPENDIX A E-6505 FIELD EXPLORATION Our field exploration was performed on April 14, 1994. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling four borings to a maximum depth of sixteen and one-half feet (16.5) feet below existing grade. The borings were drilled by Associated Drilling using a truck mounted drill rig. Continuous-flight, hollow-stem augers were used to advance and support the boreholes during sampling. Approximate boring locations were determined by taping from property corners. The locations of the borings should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate locations are shown on the Boring Location Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by an engineer from our firm who classified the soils encountered and maintained a log of each boring, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site features. All samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System which is presented on Plate Al, Legend. Logs of the borings are presented in the Appendix on Plates A2 through A5. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. In each boring, Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed at selected intervals in general accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1586. The split spoon samples were driven with a one hundred forty (140) pound hammer freely falling thirty (30) inches. The number of blows required to drive the last twelve (12) inches of penetration are called the "N-value". This value helps to characterize the site soils and is used in our engineering analyses. Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Earth Consultants. Inc. MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH LETTER SYMBOL SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTION dn°°4ao°o o GW Well-Graded Gravels,Gravel-Sand ' Gravel .vv.°.°°.°°. a. . .0. .0. ' gw Mixtures, Little Or No Fines And Clean Gravels °o ° .._ °'O' 'O Gravelly (little or no fines) •''�;:�;;�; : GP Poorly-Graded Gravels,Gravel- Coarse Soils •0. '•''0- '! gp Sand Mixtures,Little Or No Fines Grained Soils More Than GM Silty Gravels,Gravel-Sand- 50% Coarse Gravels With gm Silt Mixtures • Fraction Fines(appreciable Retained On amount of fines) /f1gc GC Clayey Gravels,Gravel-Sand- No.4 Sieve r Clay Mixtures 0000 Sand o o pO,°Oo°o And Clean Sand 0°°° 00 `SW SW Well-Graded Sands, Gravelly ° °0 Sands, Little Or No Fines o ° o Sandy (little or no fines) .:. :.t. More Than Soils :: :.:••: : SP Poorly-Graded Sands, Gravelly 50% Material :;::::::_:;;�:, Sp Sands, Little Or No Fines Larger Than More Than No.200 Sieve 50% Coarse SM Silty Sands, Sand-Silt Mixtures Size Fraction Sands With Sm Passing No:4 Fines(appreciable Sieve amount of fines) SC SC Clayey Sands, Sand-Clay Mixtures ML Inorganic Silts&Very Fine Sands,Rock FlourSilty- �pl Clayey Fine Sands;Clayey Silts w/Slight Plasticity Fine Silts Liquid Limit CL Inorganic Clays Of Low To Medium Plasticity, Grained And Less Than 50 � CI Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean Soils Clays I I I Organic Silts And Organic 1 III I I 1 I i 1 I 1 OL OI Silty Clays Of Low Plasticity lyl l l , • I MFI Inorganic Silts, Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fire More Than l mh Sand Or Silty Soils 50% Material Silts ' Smaller Than And Liquid Limit CH Inorganic Clays Of High No.200 Sieve Clays Greater Than 50 7 Ch Plasticity, Fat Clays. Size • OH Organic Clays Of Medium To High // oh Plasticity, Organic Silts ///////// - — • pT Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils Highly Organic Soils `_. -_; __, , _ pt With High Organic Contents ' Topsoil ••,,,;'".'"•"ti",,,_r Humus And Duff Layer FillkXkK Highly Variable Constituents The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. . DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classification.UPPER CASE LETTER SYMBOLS designate sample classifications based upon laboratory testing; LOWER CASE LETTER SYMBOLS designate classifications not verified by laboratory testing. C TORVANE READING,tsf I 2'O.D. SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf W MOISTURE,%dry weight 11 24"I.D.RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER. P SAMPLER PUSHED * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED i WATER OBSERVATION WELL pot DRY DENSITY,lbs.per cubic ft. LL LIQUID LIMIT, % 2 DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER PI PLASTIC INDEX DURING EXCAVATION • Y SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL W/DATE 'li ' 44) LEGEND i', p) Earth Consultants Inc. Ci.•uuxlmk:l la tab wers.C'u)luyluls&Environmental Sckaulsis 1 Proj. No. 6505 I Date APR'94 I Plate Al • Boring Log . Project Name: Sheet of McDonald's Restaurant •I 1 1 Job No.: Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No: 6505 ' D. Lynne 4/14/94 4/14/94 B' 1 Drilling Contractor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated Drilling HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: . ❑Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ❑Abandoned, sealed with bentonite W No. : -c ' n. rn.n Surface Conditions: Gravel parking Blows E m E 8 E • k 1°) Ft. 6 e o ,g D ::: :: sin Brown silty medium to coarse SAND with gravel, • `:•::: dense, moist :4 .-:: ' 2 — 3 SP Brown poorly graded medium to coarse SAND with 3.1 31 gravel, dense, moist 4 5 - , 2.2 37 . 6 7 — . . 3.5 34 8 • . 9 10 5.6 35 11 . Boring terminated at 11.5 feet below exiting 12 grade. No groundwater encountered during drilling. Boring backfilled with cuttings. 13 14 15 16 • 17 18 19 ./P i(E1�: ��4►\ Boring Log the `lyviiI Earth Consultants Inc. MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT Geo"d nl al Engin s'Ceobglsts&F"Wror mental Sde"rtsts RENTON, WASHINGTON Proj. No. 6505 Dwn. GLS Date APR'94 Checked DSL I Date 4/25/94 I Plate A2 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and iudoment.They are not necessarily .Boring Log • - Project Name: • Sheet of McDonald's Restaurant 1 1. Job No.: I Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No: 6505 D. Lynne 4/14/94 4/14/94 B-2 Drilling Contractor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated Drilling HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ❑Abandoned,sealed with bentonite W No. : -c n cn-6 Surface Conditions: • Blows m F a li E E (%) Ft. 6 cn o in =cn 1" of asphalt .•':::. 1 — sm Brown silty medium to coarse SAND with gravel, •c ••. medium dense, moist _ • 2 SP Brown poorly graded medium to coarse SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist 3.1 17 • 4 • 3.3 20 6 7 — • 8 . 3.8 57 9 -high count due to rock in sampler (medium dense) 10 3.4 16 11 12 Boring terminated at 11.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during 13 drilling. Boring backfilled with cuttings. 14 15 - 16 17 18 19 ii!!"� 'Al 441\ Boring Log . � ' ( r� I Earth Consultants Inc. MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT MI/\ VI/ \\,f) �'g'"° °E" ar sc+�"'�,s RENTON, WASHINGTON Proj. No. 6505 Dwn. GLS Date APR'94 Checked DSL I Date 4/25/94 I Plate A3 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole.modified by enaineerinn tests anafycic aon hulnrnord Thnv nro.,,,,..00-oce.ra.. Boring Log -. . Project Name: of • McDonald's Restaurant • 1Sheet 1 1 Job No.: Logged by: Start Date: 'Completion Date: Boring No: 6505 D. Lynne 4/14/94 4/14/94 B V Drilling Contractor: Drilling Method: • Sampling Method: Associated Drilling HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑Monitoring Well ❑Piezometer ❑Abandoned,sealed with bentonite W No. 22 s a cn2 Surface Conditions: Grass Blows m S m t E 8 E . (%) Ft. g o cn n :c;;;;::: SM Brown silty fine to medium SAND, very loose, _ ...{: 1 — moist to wet y:.,••: : 2 _— : :: 3 • 14.8 3 ::c•,::s :::,.,.. 4 ::•,i: 5 ' -becomes loose • 9.0 7 :iY >; :: - ' 7 , sp Brown poorly graded medium to coarse SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist 8 . 6.3 17 9 . 10 . 3.4 12 ' 11 1::::...!... . 12 13 , 14 • 3.6 19 :-.:::::i. 15 . 16 Boring terminated at 15.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during 17 drilling. Boring backfilled with cuttings. 18 19 /P.; •pV, 441\ • Boring Log Hob,(ii10,0 Earth Consultants Inc. MCDONAIti)'S RESTAURANT eeotecnnteaf Engineers.Cegloglsts a Environmental Scientists RENTON, WASHINGTON • Proj. No. 6505 Dwn. GLS Date APR'94 Checked DSL I Date 4/25/94 I Plate A4 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests.analysis and iudoment.Thee are net nereccariie Boring Log . 'Project Name: Sheet of McDonald's Restaurant • 1 1 Job No.: Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No: 6505 D. Lynne 4/14/94 4/14/94 Drilling Contractor: • Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated Drilling HSA SPT • Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑Monitoring Well ❑Piezometer E Abandoned, sealed with bentonite No. r L a rn 2 Surface Conditions:, Gravel parking W oho Blows a m E E Ft. ( to o ccit) o sm. Dark brown silty GRAVEL with sand, loose to 1 — medium dense, moist -sub-rounded to rounded cobbles 2 — 5.9 6 : 3 — 4 y..0 - GP Brown poorly grade GRAVEL with sand, loose, if••• moist • .•- 5 Y•V 3.6 5 '••• 6 , •••• • i:. .is. ••A 8 -becomes dense 3.7 31 .••. .••V • ••.• 7••• 10 •••• -becomes loose to medium dense • •v 2.6 10 •••• v•v 11 .•.. • •v • •r�v 12 r•r •••• 13 2.6 26 r'r -becomes• dense r�r 14 • r•r .•.. •..w 15 • •.. 40 •a•r —no recovery • ••• 16 i : 17 Boring terminated at 16.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during 18 drilling. Boring backfilled with cuttings. 19 - ,o E�v: \ Boring Log �1 1�� .�.at< ,i, Earth Consultants Inc. MCDONAI,D'S RESTAURANT nu ' �` r Geot"fu'�I Engineers.Ge logiss&Environmental Scientists RENTON, WASHINGTON Proj. No. 6505 Dwn. GLS Date APR'94 Checked DSL I Date 4/25/94 I Plate A5 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis and judgment.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accent resnonsihility Inr Iho uco of internromsnn by nthnre of;nmrr„nt;nn n.oee..,e.1,....h:..i.... SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS B. SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S.STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM N �'a a�� a 'n .f O 1p O O Co O O O p O O O CO N O O O O �; 100^ ID 4 M N r- 0 ? rl at CO r- r- N CI ti U,10 00.- N O O O O, q •0 N cn I_ 90 - i 10 'm 08 1 20 0; gn moo 30 7m0 n rO -Z-I CAm TI 60 , 40 -.1- GC z m co O W 50 - 50 Co m \ m m w - \\ _ E. n m40 �p 60 co 00 3 r) G) �` --II 30 �� 70 m ....1a co \ , =o 20 `\d so C X- eo a 10 90 cn r � - Z��rJJ 0 I JIIIILI I r l l l l r 1 1 I I I I I 11 1 100 0 O O O M O V M N O co ID M N e- 00 f0 tf M N r• O O O O O O C 0 0 O O z z M N GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS • d I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM z 0 (A COBBLES COARS GRAVEL SAND I FINE FINES > m N U] �1 ko zt KEY Boring or DEPTH USCS DESCRIPTION Moisture LL PL f) /o) .... z m -0H 0 B-2 5 SP Brown poorly graded SAND with gravel 3.3 --- -- .4 co tf1w A--- B-4 12.5 GP Brown poorly graded GRAVEL with sand 2.6 -- -- , - �, .<° ��... .� .�,te,r�:.tea � . �� -:";. �**,'., L, � IA ISLE L I°ST.O 4w , . ;0, ,,:_a :- b D 9 ;'4W � V s a xSy \i STC ,, s y /w ~�OIsRO "Y : '4 ' qy ` 'i , ° 3°,,„ Y%'^,,, Q W RENTt N G v' v w RC/'6'<;* f 0 gr MARCH 18, 1996 90 / t : �� 4 • 9'',187ERO (-\� 1V SS'ONAL�I ID PREPARED FOR: EXPIRES 1n/q7 EMERALD CITY CONSTRUCTION 19119 NORTH CREEK PARKWAY, SUITE 101 , ^„p BOTHELL, WA 98011 -., z ;1,43. 7 PREPARED BY: cep yO�R o� • BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 18215 - 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 — (206) 251-6222 OUR JOB NO. 5660 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF WORK 1 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION 1 3.0 DELINEATION OF STUDY AREA 1 3.1 Upstream Drainage Basin 2 3.2 On-Site Drainage 2 3.3 Downstream Drainage Course 2 4.0 RESOURCE REVIEW 3 FIGURES Vicinity Map Figure 1 Soils Map Figure 2 Floodplain Map Figure 3 Preliminary Grading and Storm Drainage Plan Figure 4 APPENDIX Sensitive Area Folios 1 5660.007 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF WORK Emerald City Construction proposes to develop property at the SWC-N.E. 4th Street and Monroe Avenue N.E., Renton,Washington, with a 4,350 square foot combination quick serve restaurant and a Chevron convenience market. This also includes facilities for the retail distribution of gasoline. As part of the building permit procurement process, an evaluation of the existing/potential conditions of the downstream drainage system must be conducted. In response to this requirement, a Level I storm drainage analysis was conducted and herewith presented in report form. The analysis follows the procedures as outlined in Section 1.2-2 of the King County, Washington, Surface Water Design Manual, 1992. The scope of the Level I analysis generally includes the following: • Identify upstream and downstream study areas. • Gather and review material resources containing information regarding existing and potential flooding and erosion problems. • Physically inspect the drainage system within the study area for evidence of existing/potential drainage problems. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION The site is approximately 1.03 acres, zoned Arterial Commercial, and presently developed with the Alexander's Auction facility. The proposal requires complete demolition and removal of the existing building structures as well as all other existing site improvements. The new development includes the convenience market/quick serve restaurant, the freestanding canopy, and underground gasoline storage tanks which would be surrounded by appropriate parking, drive aisles, and landscaping. The topography of the site is relatively flat. There is little or no relief across the property. A significant steep slope is present immediately adjacent to the south property boundary. Remediation and reclamation of this adjacent slope is to be completed by the adjacent owner prior to the redevelopment of the site. Because the entire property is developed, there are no hydrologic features, including wetlands, streams, ponds, etc. observed on site. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (see Figure 3), the site does not lie within a floodplain. 3.0 DELINEATION OF STUDY AREA By use of the available topographic information, together with visiting the study area, the upstream tributary area and the downstream drainage course were defined. The following subsections identify our analysis of the components of the study area. 3.1 Upstream Drainage Basin The site is essentially at the upper reaches of the drainage basin which the site belongs. Therefore, no off-site runoff from upstream sources drains onto the project site, with the exception of overflow runoff from the public system in Monroe. The site has been subject to runoff from the existing public system within Monroe Avenue N.E., during extreme Barghausen Consulting Engineers,Inc. -1- 5660.007[JSG/ps] rainfall intensities. It is our understanding that the Monroe Avenue storm drain is an infiltration type system and the overflow problem is partially attributed to maintenance and sedimentation control. It is our understanding that current maintenance of the system will prevent further problems with runoff entering onto the subject property. To assist with preventing runoff from Monroe Avenue entering onto the site, the proposed driveway shall be built with a slight berm. 3.2 On-Site Drainage A stormwater control plan would be prepared for this project. Even though a storm drainage system presently serves the existing development, all on-site storm drainage facilities would be improved in accordance with current City of Renton standards. Prior to any discharge of stormwater, all runoff would be collected on site and either "detained" or "retained" according to the design standards set forth by the City of Renton. Our preliminary drainage system design utilities "retention" as the method of controlling runoff. The proposed drainage system would be designed to dispose stormwater into the underlying soils via infiltration. Treatment of stormwater would also be provided prior to its release from the site, or into the underlying soil. All stormwater from the pavement areas will be treated via biofiltration or other means such as a coalescing plate oil/water separator. The site is located within an Aquifer Protection Zone No. 2 which requires that the biofiltration swale be lined with an impermeable membrane. 3.3 Downstream Drainage Course This project proposes to dispose stormwater runoff on site via infiltration. Therefore, a connection to the existing downstream conveyance system is not proposed. Therefore, the downstream drainage system will not be affected by the increase of on-site stormwater runoff produced by this project. 4.0 RESOURCE REVIEW The following is a description of each of the resources that was reviewed for the preparation of this Level I Drainage Study: a. Critical Drainage Area Maps: The site is not located within a critical drainage area. b. Flood Plain/Floodway FEMA Maps: The project is not located within a floodplain of a stream as determined by the FEMA maps (Figure 3). c. Other Off-site Analysis Reports: No other off-site analysis reports were conducted for this project. d. Sensitive Areas Folio: Each of the sensitive areas folio associated with this area were reviewed. No sensitive areas that were identified on or adjacent to the site. e. Wetlands Inventory Maps: As mentioned previously, no wetlands are located on the site. Barghausen Consulting Engineers,Inc. -2- 5660.007[JSG/ps] • w w ¢ > • • C wZ ¢Z 0 p' vi w z o .-t �- , z • o z 3 m� o m ..NE 4th $T ��� o GREEN WOOD • �+ 3�d 5� OEM, • e 4 PROJECT{ ui \ SITE z ��--.. _____ RENTON ---\____ q,?\ ! RO Ri q \ MAPLEWOOD i/ f / r/I Nr: CHEVRON/QSR SWC-N.E. 4TH STREET AND MONROE AVENUE N.E. FIGURE 1 RENTON, WA VICINITY MAP Barghausen Consulting Engineers,Inc. 5660.007[JSG/ps] DiEc/ 12'30" 6 M.. TO INTERSTATE 90 ' AkF (Joins sheet 5) AmC ISSAQUAH I?MI. 0' L/7- 7 : ::::$:1:1;:::1;::;::;:: i:4:i1:4::;:::•ii: 7 gih•ViRMia;jj $igh�an.1{,�h. �. M 111 7::7.,::::-I 75.."•:. ' iT' Sch .= �i �•--�--�� ....--:.1i f i; .:; :::: j •• ` •: 1 ter•... •• - y :. 41 AgC•> 1 r-- 0 '' .:.iir. //i p't� �� , -t "J :.9 . 3 1 H- .16,1!-'3 . . . .,, . . 1 ----.0‘ .4t...:........ :. 4L 11---. 1 Li: -, .:. • .. __ ■,�f ti� % `►\� `}- \,'i ooricivigirlt- i :.:: -..:.. ,. ` .:..r I�: .. ri77:.Ev6 _= r =-%1i j �'/H �,p�B-M�� • 1itillnirt . ..1 ., T ..e'.. Ig - 'Ihitat.ara.r,,,,,.,..:...,.,,„.:,,,:,.. . . ii j a II:..E. :B 'uE field ,lliellb, / t919s� ilpir /../ ,-' l :,T i • • . 3 11111 \'/ i� 1 ._� 1 1 Greenwood ea n • - • —� �'r�/1J / �r , t. i I •/•l �a7. '�•406 ..., I C •` 'r , I/iii\I •\ - EvC ��((�i o 11 .: `.asebaiF� > �� �D il\ Cemi 1� �vJ °o� An II, i { Park GRAVEL 'PIT `. a p r� ��l �' ` I t • •I• \ 4- 1 ,I ii .....„6.....- •z- - V 321: o\ a �� el ;.;.,. .,,,\.\\\‘,:.:,!I r-trito , .15 I�1./Ir ii�riAl. a \\ •\kF I(1,: ,.. TTL:1 I ':::±,:.: !.,',\ll I� j -. till ' •:..', ::. • •• . •i-- . . -:!'- ,-. ' ., :.:': ••,0 .. iipiLi AkF'Ur ,� ��. �� AkF 44 BM..; M e. ,ACI111k. : • I t . t. ... .,,,.. • . -- ---- N R,-• - . ,144-0j1) _ I. AkF �RP �co/f,/st\a\I. Id JIllm AgC BM�3;7 i\ ` � •�� CoGp, . - T- - e --•----• •s I ._ ate' o? -__° /:' ViNii.... ;-.-.„/ Rh lo--- -'1. ‘:! \ c r , , \ - Substa i AmC E, � ` n`. - � 4V4 .••• ;I/ C i °1 ki %,Os . • 1 AgC I C�l�` _AkF J \ a �.. • :i:' ° t� \ aon on / / n n,. a s � / 9.0— .3%d ere : JCS Mq.O GIs i )E70,7 O 6f?/Ctie 240,'E CHEVRON/QSR SWC-N.E. 4TH STREET AND MONROE AVENUE N.E. FIGURE 2 RENTON, WA SOILS MAP Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 5660.007 [JSG/ps] _ 4OC/MA/ NORTHEAST 4TH STREET X OP�HEPS� N E N 4G/ * AA, 0'5's O Aeoev'O,C,v.v 00 ZAj f-'le/ea/ NORTHEAST 2ND ZONE X NOTE: MAP AREA SHOWN ON THIS PANEL LOCATED TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST. WITHIN QN2j/1 % f6o,e). A44,c, CHEVRON/QSR SWC-N.E. 4TH STREET AND MONROE AVENUE N.E. FIGURE 3 RENTON, WA FLOODPLAIN MAP Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 5660.007[JSG/ps] PRELIMINARY GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN ( . , . . I MK I I L- N..., N.....„._ . --'-`7,-; I- 1\ • ... N .,..' N-..-.. .i.?.. , .,, , . •.„ , • \ ,.. .... 1 ii \ • YATCRES 1.C4AnCON N.,. NN ----•-•-•".- .F..-__.,___. tell le • , --, (....! . \ !. •!'101 lOalt '':11:71i1.-1-: ------..-.. / --) - -2 .'-.... - all' g ' '""-- ---.------r--4..---__,_______.6„ e N. r '. --''''4-— --.g ,1 f 1 n l'Oft.%;;•-?-',4r-,--(1-11(% •N - BI EXTRA,HI .•':----- 41 °,2LF. .- -- ----- 0 - w _._---- I,no tEeoa r/PLASM i' '\•,\ SW ,At .._ 1 swEROLL1RA11011 7,,zi •• ,--er i„. I,L.. •• -e _....... ---•_..-- —___ Iv v\ , ...___..,..a'...F,R9m1„... P- irn ..,,'----. -----4 ---_......1__ a ! /' / / •----...)11.110ii I\\\.'"ar V.S1 r° , \../ '< N "'" L. - 4' -...,- --3..4,-—ammo=- _1111'n\\\\\WAV`c,Z.1.\• iti`.' •:.. ' -;, '1 ' ' i Irr - 79419..,..!ET"' 4, ,...-z Z".4--.77-fic-'- - : ... / / / / / ' Iliq\'.:00. . . .. ... ‘,-,...i . i.i ....0 '••-.70' / ••E• •oNAjEO. .._milatil42::' . ir - _____,' NM•TRH) pp yip.'' $. / / '' .. i f I I i -."'. •.' ' ..-,' .it,41.164116 ' '''`, N .1,, .; ...;,-,i,v--"/ .. , . : ! i i f I !Illy/ / /\\,.;:‘,... W - , i .:9. -.. / 11', ---‘,. •- ---______. ‘..s•I AIRE 11, QV i__.-I ' "S I i • • I 'il'i IV I/ / .1:....- ,j'C• -'‘ , L__ .7 i_ .,......„.5. .11,...___f.,_ .,, 117 ,m,,,-.4--7—cy;rv—r,\ FL , , il I I/ '''''' •-•: ,' w , „111;11isi-. 4,6...tk's‘ 4" 4, .....s , • • ... DOWNSOUE 1,A1FCTOR •A•A 1., 1 i i l'1(I I I('I '4 a'6 C .W.t".*1/4A,t‘ 3 g , •--/ . 1 ,.• • ••„,-1-•.. DIRECTLY'TO RET.SM. • ,,,-..• \ .4 I,. .-''''... •• -jr:43/' ft 1 1 1 1 &•,4 % g , y , ,,, TN ''• -/ A/--1 V' MEI_ionlEnpAssielosvoLE) • • a..22.)::! •(=> 1 ;./i Vit'•-•' ..'; i'.,,. .1 \ 1 . '... • , .; .7$,-...,/,:,)1 II I 1 1 1 r i,1 ...-. • V, , / ,,,,c;• i 44.41M,Y40:04', CATCH: \ 2'.. ...E• . 1'' i I ''' 1 • ",:9.• ,.., ...- 1 .•• ._ • ' -'z,'/..,.,,,,i i 1 1 I ii,Iiiiii I ,1, ,/ . _1 ,___, .. -.•.. ,PC A ,,, ,,_..• , .' ';i1Pt% ''''''k.,-<"...: '' • "!!!!•,, !'. 1 ,i ;1 1;1•' .,,IJA I . . • • . ‘ •,/ lj)11111!1 Illqi II,% // %'' s/ V I IS i TREND.'MN E.I.531:0''''''' -.s..••. \ C / , l' •• \I... ' ' l,... ..,..$da.i /)1 I I 1 ,i I n -, , , r ei TO ISOLATE 1 ,1RANopy ARE,: CD• •CD 57,06ii. A•• .• 1 I al a L. . i ! ii.i 1 ...:;./!: /'../1./. .'eo'' 'II 11110\. /-'-1 . „., Din . Al FRO14 STOR111 s• ---1 .1. I ..--....../•../,!,•//.../.,./,s,4,,_ .4 sil ii . 1r, _=.1 4 ..,•-o•1...-..I ' ...-r"L:•••—TRENCH MN .1 t • I ill IV 1 • ,r1 TO COLLECT •1 - •1,-: I Id L, 1:1,•'...:,/,/ ',//./r//,/,'SrEr#: 1 • . 18 IP , , ,... COHORT --C3k___kW24 .41:7GE'ER)T° A.' - • 1 CI. , ..?•1 114`i I, .' ..'..:•'-',/' /r/,' /,',' /744'• :' 1 Z lb ' '- 1 3T.' h i i ‘i, '.• 341.5 1 r --ec''• .'il CAT 3 •• -f-Pnr--2-11.• ! ,.....,......,71,/,//•,/,',Or P.114 gal,I I/i . ' as BO' , 4..".71r• . •11 .' r),i, ,,.:. I.. I I ,H1 ___ ,,,,,, , FIN. tli -IL-01 NA .... ' •li ........::::1:-..:::::::•'.;•'°A.P''"A'./Vcv4Z-- --'1/J. '' .3'''.8 . ., ! --‘--CP' r‘in 4 SEVARkilory. ••1 ' - -A." 'r .. ' 1\,_,,,..,,.,., / I ie,1 ID ® 4 r••• 1, .::.-.•...-.;....;,.-'. 4,7.-,,,=3"---- / !..,„:,:,ter.— -- - • Us, , A..,i. il , ig,: ! , •1 341.4 - , .. . ... 1 c')(I) ) TO SAN. '.AN1-. I IF.II -' r •* r* ••,7,4T'lf Afr ---"--,-<. SEWEg \• I •r'.1I l'''cl 1'1111 1 _Ripg_ !!!.... ..•'!.•.:.•..,. ..c" I !k.111 V I'0,1 --,w„. 0 s:_.._.-- w;,,,re 1.. ill,/ 2,1 _Ii II - , ,p s- CORNER ....•......'''..j... .' :',..7..,1'.: -I 1 ).T2z-,, . ,. , \ ° • ' ..--•- "1 7---- - • ' : - .•' • -- -! 1-1-54,,";, ‘i-k„.. I .•?,..4.1-0 / -4,-----""r J-..-N _ I,. . -C ,....,,,,.., 6 SNC.I.0 VIE-§rilln—r- -.. -,_.....f .._,Cforl‘t I 125.-0 ,..v.! :••10.4 f--1,7_1.1 . \--. -- --------E-,...,..i;-aw----------- .:-------- -------- ' -4 , / 7 ,,.,.,:. -- i 0 so.„_..- 1.___ , "-- MONROE AVENUE NE-------- •-- ---- •' -—-----;-- .--cl-- .•':,; ,/,.. ""'"' •,. "-"' 1 - \ V.1...1 \- , DOVI3lE.61.10F 51.14,PE 3 jiZZ giL•C . .------- „ POLE ' • • • CHEVRON/QSR SWC —N.E. 4TH STREET AND MONROE AVENUE N.E. FIGURE 4 RENTON, WA PRELIMINARY GRADING & STORM DRAINAGE PLAN Barghausen Consulting Engineers,Inc. 5660.007 [JSG/ps] APPENDIX SENSITIVE AREA FOLIOS 1, r M•-N--• .�.....(' \ "`.f' • "G; _ ` :Aa6: ' . lam / .\ ; `4 �-• t / _•• . ..- +. '' ; w 'Sr.a,r P_ ,E _ I i �_ .^. `,.s''•P_� - '^ i k L, I - ,G', "4s.1 7i,.f 1 t.Vy.,sr' a`s'e'1Yf ,+ y ! �� • >r.,r. ,yl _ _ .. :�'a•:✓'J.i^ tJ -\ A -r. •,� � J '1: \ +'•s,.,1 'k`" ; t -4,t ,-- a„t.,k-, "^•' Yr• l I .1 1 ' •' .._ /,,r -U 'S f' Uk./ •I':.r'Ti:`.--i11 '.:\` h �' j F - : \•�---.••• ,'.4{I%4 *- }•t i,'v +,• ••r ;,, aft ,-.4 ,,I fir^'`',- c''i��. f r .1. r rj'r / _ - ... .,�• � t35f ,' C". t. 1 ,, n1 �•�tri[ !` • / ,`\.. 1' /. •G+, '7 '% ) r J, 1 ate`, 3; , .41:1 riiko .wig,;, , r 1t� , 4-4:,, "i „it..•_, _ I-,, ,-� ._:✓_ • r • � ."�r•=�\ ^.. _ .:r.� -, 1^\ �- __ .1 . .',�. j S -\ r-/ GkIV ' L) j.\' N 'it :/•.- •i :5 �l •`/ x''''\ 1. r. Cr w :6-�` / ,, ? A :`r i.;- . . c _ape% 'Z� .z • : : \. - ,:_ - • ;k?\'<:'- d.•:._.J } ,- ,R,,,47:1 ,;9 , ,' �, '';. ,�I\'` '�' , :-s.� - ' .;.,; �'�i -'' -- . -'' ff", 1. \l"\—r' r'1 .) t I ter' ,.,•;1:%, _ .,/ F"- .-),1\'1' t.‘,.' 3 . > -)• '(-1-;-'7'-C., 0(.A. ..,--;",r1 e,R0 '•:.'", ..---- \\•`k 1 ,',\I',I .• f. •_ �`S' �:MT' '/ / - ram ` \ �- .f > ._- 7 T.:.,, , , . ../ •., .,,,. ,,,• -. _.:.„. ., „.„5,„ w . ,-\11,,',..:.3 -, - , '',jib C_. i \' , ,l) ..,,. I . /// i�I,.. �1'':. r „ :: '. kF �♦1it'f�� fry. ..... -\• ��___ %�'• ••; ,:'�°� ,�\�\ _ 'y ^1.,"^ti/-.\:�.,., �J4:<;n`., ?' /`��'J. rl 1. ,.( • .�' -..�'l��' I'.• -/i +,ta\ 1' .�./:a`: 4 \ `\Y_ =fib' , r ,ry` k„ 19 /1. �� fr. • ate:: ==r?: � - @ •4c \ — :': '• -• '('•j•••-• -)vc--- ',.• t. ' - ',_.•,,_,' ,_.....,;.... ..\\ 70._...___..... \> r, :r \ f� • ,, --- f� v _ � , 7. • __ rel�pj \'''''''''' a`1 _� SC � • *• . $r '\1 4 ; \i.6*•1 t k t.t.-3 .3 !'n` I �r-(-•-�- '' i'- %,i• •, '');• • ..nne7 � � � T e • �� ra 1•. �/- ` \\ ,•l �iim, I r \ •.-1. �� r i ", [ 1,.\.��. au ` ///''''^^�.,\:, :c• _ I. r- zs •' ,.• 1' /''+ `•' � 1. ,�. ./.-.,, , :�i �e.,:, 4Z'' . +r,J �1`} , -- ^•\`9 .1_.,. / .J.. .:,, ' . - i'� � • <>: 1„ w�� ;. ,. 3 '�f _ �d ,1I( Ca �-'.1� �ig lJll \ 1 ..`(,, ( .,I. Iv 1 1/2 0 1 The boundaries of the sensitive areas dis- These coat mines have had additional min- Wa� ���e Hazard played on these maps are approximate. ing since the most recent map was filed with Wa Mine u I I Additional sensitive areas that have not the Washington Department of Natural Re- been mapped may be present on a Bevel- sources. Any development that occurs MILE opment proposal site. Where differences adjacent to these areas should be preceded Areas occur between what is illustrated on these by a thorough study to confirm or deny the maps and the site conditions,the actual pre- existence of additional subsurface tunnels. • sence or absence on the site of the sensitive area - as defined in the Sensitive Area Ordinance-is the legal control. • '�. � •:i� . • .: ' y � �•i�: ,e. '.._r. h c+ •marx• +y"» �„�fi._C�['•` • -..'�}* ta .=5• '},. r s, s �� r _ ate :. nv v •, ' .r!L�w..r {. +<al � �ST3•. •. .� :2h'? :�'.•,.G•.- �' r ! . _' � 'd.� F •rS ��1 :'2k �.` LQV~�y�r,._ , •J ..:�dp',e , .) r'�.: '{'� J_ .;e:.:l, A �, .. s • �. < y•::r5 _.J� 'e::C.' v'-Y-``; �:'- � .,�j ,.A-,. 4 yt'i-. f rt . ti . s. ,. ``. '- tr ,f , .. . ..rr . *,`:4^ c g. j' , c4�' "�t .3: - r . . .a� G"" . '+', I ';Y•'tr rr�a�`• .+ -�.�3. � .k 5+,n•:5; L:.! ` % %'ra" nit + : : ° ` "`'.'r.r wiC.":i�'r.r•�., „�..•.•.�i 4.r•F y\t rty' . .- h. , ' �" Y:" �W�G,.�'_ 6�..a• r:.. .. �_i•._.itr.: .C.', .,, 'Fi�'••,.,.-rR::p': .'• .. r'. . h- -i•;,. ,i, _a{, vrtV:l�;,v�'i Nta' l� .:�.'r• .r-•ds J"f :ac. - s. 1-y:y j.q,y.,:�po>„.r,.'va.7..;�'gsJ_ x:y. r,i.P:�,a�:•! ....:,F _y 1..".:�>,�,.� .`^� r�k� eSci:+S'r . ..nkca.c• ??F-•-..;..:..;E�: _•;;.. r . : a...• \l �' I \. .•, .w• l '',, ° - /•,i/' J )'I p s,"1r !I 1-Yam••;',.:, - v' ✓ /'' 151_ V ,-...:::....( .--,,\.'\ \„ \, .r y '(C .1 l; \ („ '('. ra i rii4t, ' f); h.-0.----wiffi ,r T:. r rti, k /e++a ,wrvs.l'� � u 1 .. .'t '�ni .1<:.r . • 'I-( ru '' �1 ��, �;,i,;,;,� ' b"• n.:1`#,F•`,, ,�' ':u, i, , • J \ 1 .1 \�•�� ,--� C.l r. •;: •(.. • ( `\\ �• ..t( ''t�'.� ,�.,. e,,�'i -•ra �o el f( i�. '.'�C3B •1713�T! fd•DID \ n � 'i- 'mil' ay •r: l .i ',\7 �! I `�,.‘,-./.:,...-\-4:•-• •:,-32. �4Pt'tt r l., ,.�` _ J// i ,.1 'r' i ''fit"- ['. _ �, a yi • r y.� `l._;.::::4--)•:..-:•,.•--- k.,, - .6 .Y• . , .-. --.'-'• --=•-= '/•-• :!,••!-,._-.:,. -..-. -.-. ...,.•' ! -;-:.-.' -. -:•:,..,:t‹,,-.1-,i-.?....-., '.,-/-/-,•,-( i. ., ....\.. .47,0, 901, .',,,, - --- •',., .. ..,J7.,- .''. .j---.•,.....,,,,r.---. . k _ - . / -—'.. ' .\- ''" ''', - -:.i • .-- - --,.---- --;,i/:''.'- —:',-,_,i'). 1.- L'•--,',..4' .4-•-:'''--'•.•‘ 42141*.'-';''':'''_: ..(1)..,..1.1,,,• _ te_7, _ ,.:1,. ... ., •, -,•• •.,.„,e, t �7'imp� .����.� �;�= -�:: � \ -�,.:._..�.� ,ter 1 ,� �•:. \ •.,.\\ �` a.,',: .- (7'--4 t_ 9{�'`. l- :/. raj .i1 iy/, ._1 ,'.F 4..:_ .7.,..Tel•;'..''.',471r,, �� ��p/�,�, ,tom �` � 1, �� 4;:4•1'� ,y :s= �1�•-- x• 4 � ; � .11 , ',,': `;. -,�:•.), i r'.I r.... ;l ip �!_ - '.'' / ''°y -iy.. r- f .*a :6} l:,w`Z�' qq�� 'f, V'9�Hr8Al /-.,•'���• , `�. ��•�`:> -_J .•�.,' _ •f ' t r.,;a,rr,.�•� -�'�.,'_ ',i.^' ' -� .J`r �;`• .�kgVC �V0�12 \.. // '1 V.^' ./L�` .'1'-:�'wyr./ �:q° p / r .g'i''1F•4 �r:;aw• p • )' - i,u:.- - � ��. � 'fir- • . .•�!' ,�;. y:�r,.p •ia•• �.; ��1 ec,X i�g '--. _�"-.. •I f,.i_.�-:�l;,'�.-r WWI I ,:,' ILA r I • �.' '1\„_r ., \ C. -. 1� 'y y't-, ,` �..e.:y :\ -_�-.-n �C,�` -�{ .i✓, lr Ir: 1 �\e.it V „, 1, .:,aft\\\;.i!- z. •�� :' �� \.. ,\- ' i.( ';!. ,�'$? � a ;—�^-..., ��✓ v�i illiP cr-t �X6 �. j ,24,...„:.,4_.... ?,.. , -..4.1L„,,,,,,z,1\-.1-•..-.:'". , . ., , .`\ \, , "•. , , �Mi \-. j. r-*\ _;"l ''• ,••tcl ,,,; r,i Z ''1 y-i.• ,•1 ,• a • ,,.: f. • �� S • l f' :tea . r. • _•_'tip• • _ t�r 1111.,�` \' •'\ \%. \ '\ \f— ' .-.. . :..-•� '\')'> a'i l -- 'M '�i` dam y' :;� '( 1 1 ,. vif°' R ', .r•, '. { - ._C'. '• .\. { ,''., • • ,-_,..,/tic. ,... , .)14 • . ..„ ,....,... .,„. 7. , 4 .1, •\.\ �14'-,*. 1'lv:`' �''�T" 1 4.. .\v ll,��� '1I�I I I •�\ �( ' 11'rS �'(( I IV L\, _ • by,,, \ ;:r... _ - \t y'',ti',' �',,"•. i'• •: •C,j:.,.r..r T's .Qv" ��r' ' '�,.`�, r Z:' Tf/.�. .\ '-,`._'J.\ \. .1• :, 1•t( T•"#f.t-�to, ',�1 e._ •C!`"ika. f ro Y > �. •e +x ..,,,> >r „r �93. :r ? " "u. \ �.. as, -- 'Ni • :r.'\ !!"U FggrkY �i.'w•a''"ir `: r,Ga?�^--r, r4'�(",�lu.!�yy,�r,rr�_ 4st1 '�c`.�r^y�,. � r1 ,.�, �.'.\ ,r• .,t., �•N. ,�� * "; '\,I. G - .„. • cl/� \ \- '"Vil.,.:N.r- ';"•,.R 7 1� ♦ >n- -�`'tl/.f-,,.dL \\lr zap s 'R'� fit'` » l \l.;•r, . , \( \ ` f j�.. Al � > i \a Y. � �- �1 '�• t r I•1 kmt" '/�'y'Grtyr" �'`�`,`'�N11� , ® .., •, -.') \ .r.f ,,-,D `9 ` .1:,. • iallre re ,,;„,„ . ..‘ \...2.....E..., .1T:.: .,- '( 't .---:- '' Z:', •'i',-,4‘..,"-, ill.=i_.i.1--ia..., map .,'. �Elld5ts . 4 'ter • .: . Milifi'alT \F v '�1 • .:i ;�\ r • , "• •r., - • �26-.`-_� ---.; I\.. - 25 .may. ki i \e:' ice: , 11 > r � i 'ti.�j` l\• ♦ li , I'' • ri ' The boundaries of the sensitive areas dis- Sn wetlands and landslide It az naps fur Seismic ������ 1 1/2 0 1 additional potential seismic hazard areas. Played on these maps are approximate. Wetlands end landslide areas are susceptible Additional sensitive areas that have not been mapped may be present on a Bevel- to failure during earthquakes. Other seismic Areas . opment proposal site. Where differences hazard areas not shown oil thjs map are MILE N occur between what is illustrated on these shorelines underlain by lacustrine sediments; maps and the site conditions,the actual pre- these are susceptible to liquefaction. sense or absence on the site of the sensitive area - as defined in the Sensitive Area . Ordinance-is the legal control. ,o.: - rs s. T`+,i.:'•,..� u3:;-�,�-�'iv. '�v`c,5,�k''a.-Y�:.3.';•r':".Y;%:y�`i."�1.�Y, .Y•h�.-;�r,�'�"`i.'''i"' .?c.K:' .� q.'� 7�b i it`s-=^„� -.ns '�••`-rem ,.if� - -�6': er.... ,,�;;a:Rvyl.` ..:r .:,. Vp'-.�.�.'., : -•o.s'. :— r,.�c'�,e'•,.< w•,i 18.iD- r. :.-;,,, Y s ysti fir.n,.7., .' �'Ir..;,r- ,,. }�` • X.r.i.• cep. • ,,,, .ti::'4.-A,it:. ,, ,-',V r:w •. .'F n :'tt' '' ,r rimt•,`47.Tin-''4,. --+•�5;..;., ..,,ceox,*,t, sr.`•4i:`,'�-,4-...`i'.' % •.ri' ,. .t,3' '•.- �*.'.o?,tu.!�vcf"=5,•„s,, `-••-'-r'C: ._.4'':::;,• ',.rii:is f•- •. ,:4.t.-4 �' e � •'.'F Fa• .,-Atiy .�-,'.3. -ry o,,- u;,, i., - r i-,..c•,•a,:v.,,•k ' • v :� ,� - : •�•,;,.c.H•vL ' .� . �v� s« ���; r n, r.1�, { C. �C 3'��SzSS„Hvr. ,•.,.°=x..._� Xz k+c e� �' ��.,,. }1: ' iv\' V \ ' �� r n.�.ai')f-•• �q'��1 ��'_ `!' i0 ..11¢¢ ..J.L �®�..`���"�.11 :A '7 %\`e\ 'l s. j( _,-. - �3 r • ;vCr:. %� �� -:1 �,I� ,.,\`ze �14� 13 y i .tea \'\ .ram, [�_ ✓' `r}`, }il !, (�,' I /,N - _ \ ``.`;'�: • -5 �_"7 -^,.. \ -._yi� \Jl�' \: �'• `-� ,11 ,K \J. t ,L J• • Il>il,,. . - \-�.=ss>.--ad.*;., b , - L • ,� ," •:,• - • � • •i , - �\� �, • --✓- I '.j ti•'Y'7.. �1_�.la6iid.- !'!:-` �/��r.,r, _�y' t `3'".t s=,. 41. •p>'+y^ 1\I '" 'r '! III =-?-'-.. . rod',•.':,. • : : - j' 1 'J ', •� 0 `-"tJCJ'.• 4w. f- . _ 7 7I;6.>__. — r •Ye 6 f r if ` yy-, (� r ^ • i` •�_, ''.,, ry it 1 S _ E -�: �:r'%��', r. ) v _ ft. :.:,,„0" - ''tip•, • •.r= .�/ ►' ,i.k ',�!' ,rk -�-' • r • `c� 1 s fir. ... y .11.1garg • - T,i:. b r t- ., �r^\\\ 1i ',; • .,�.: fir. ( �-.. ' J':'',' c t._. mil,J ,,, z•/ �1,a � "' 4 r :` - ;;. . °,,. 55 -: ��\-\` ('``,'II..':"`: " '.r Yr _ram. • c� Y p.y �. � `�'1 #I 1, • ��•-� ��W -1`P. .iivll; '�;'l•t f.: ,'�... .'' \!`Ar'/� :,Y�+�, '.2irl� 1"-f. (.-.1.:: 'J.(1...•e.{f Y?*f"�',�,AI>-'•• • 41)11•;?!LjI4rc •• • `t`1 : f .•�•. �.` .L "' .Y,,j1,c,• �1.'L". �;i,.,, -5.:�'! r i ;� r. <;' r'' ' a• :' WilAt' Sys ' . = ,'i,, • -i..• '1:l,' '-�!',;,I 'l•�i.-_-�•" _ fir..,.,.. fr y:.._,• • .yp. i f.t .n 1, +. . i 1 1' .n.;, 'a „+ ,i.., '�,:';,,+I( i. d. :.i�. � - `Ati 'Ya +\ � -\' - .', ,:� ," i • t ., '�!" r ll' •'�-, .je • ,"l. ,;k'ey .,s. to :i!- aw f�'�' ' tr JiK _ _ - � � ,` '••(�' : ( /' �.� t 3? `am• ,� - ``• : ,, j'-''1 la(�1:\• ,t ,' <'K: :,; ,' .r' r ,. r/KV,' r -..1.._"� A..,. ;-:.`ti- :�� : IRE -\- `, ,,®?..,s. l' . ! it .t. ..t',�L . 11 • ;;l1,,; y, ,,. I(\I(\'U ��� ..� •r ', (i ,1, . , ;6 • •a_ • k-qr., ..iii 1 \°\.': .1 'i , ,_•:., ,1 li, �., • "`' •�`.•,7- - -" .: ,_. Ylak:a}df•.•f_%:nii'v.'4..`s'A, c f _�, yr .%ate''-' ._K. .� i -- IO •®j \ 1�\:-. fkj tl I ill .' !' , i\� _ r `\ I '�4 ,..,.1..:-'•• ). ... -z,-----%-y-------- • k.\ :', --,_- --. • , •,,- - 11 Th'. ''' '•'' s' \* '' " ': ''• —"" D --- \\\eilitimi -!.‘, —... .. y.',-.- — -. it'.. \ . . ,. •Nr , • . IA , �� -1 ,,- 4 l!1\' " • ' ` 1 .� � i }j i .= \`� L 'i. G \ _ /I� \ 6 ' ,`.�.- ,l. is-i `'J'n.�:' .I" • '�-7, �• :i'.:• .li •.� :Y,, \-`. • lei 27 WIZ.ic �11��a1 �i r 44 % `U \a L.,„,,,,...., f1114 �I � ' 1/2 p The boundaries of the sensitive areas d;s- Landslide Hazard rr played on e m am I Additional sensitivethes areasaps are that pproxi have ate.not N=I I been mapped may be present on a Bevel- Areas MILE ■ opment proposal site. Where differences ry occur between what is illustrated on these maps and the site conditions,the actual pre sence or absence on the site of the sensitive • area - as defined in the Sensitive Area Ordinance-is the legal control. • .•v. • 1., t , 3 -S,c .,`� \C' {"'t,:1.+.• r _\_.-fit` �\ U J .': ;1,., r, w. ,=.Y, :" '.�: is �q I, iii �, * -d tt '��,,''`:.i;•. �� `q:•(. I • • 5' :�: • "r _�_� 1:� ) \�`��� ;t� 7 ' t , 4: e . r ,ii,yn .••! ram ,y:• y���\1 •• \j :f .� �la�® • y o Y s� ' �I,,r*,, • , • y • f �:.l. 1., ,\rr::- �( e yh •- . E� rf ',4 r� r ".. . ■ fi .+Kw .:l'•,-:. 4, . •I ,i l • --- \ '�lil'i• '.`.Nail9:Y.,10.Yoib , :r 's-�rS--,.�-t'�..�� ., w; ub,,,4)f �.•. � ;',.t/f4;2%iirdl6."-'\"'1\‘-''• 1- \elf% Ty. :'1,,::‘F\.. .,:‘ :.c.:..:.....,:,..;:-..'‘.-L'N.:,,.:...)....'1.: . .? ,,\ '',' \\ '., ..., (i f.--, f),-:.",.`;'-,.,-)., -' ...),I,),I•, -:,.i;•1.(..:\,',..,....i,.,v•\'`,. ...m..... .„,,,r._,4„...„,,,, , ,,......,....,.,„,„:T6..,.... '•T1\„et' c 1-'• • • L.j to ji qrt-•) , i_,.-- '�.�•\• 5 7'- • , r°- ial_�aaR. _; 71.. r -v" l'�"*'f:..� -1r \''� '\�, ���'�- - ..�"• .� .r. • ,r�,�ri' �� � t�• ..�`-.f ,;of -...s.- ,roltJc-a�"`•'<r.,a ..� 72_ p.��� ` 1`�`�f4;%� i�„�` t:'I J� �, 11),,.., \�,,l' l �•� ��ti:Alt rddpB�;,`�• v1 ��1�`q ' ':��<•..,_ '�' R'���?, t��'o• t l/ _.�+�> �., `-.• �� ` VAIL - \.' il 7/•�ail o, '.��;. . '. ---• •• I r %' ' -,-: _. a ,; ; 'c`". ,t �;-:f .2"'(;:i tr' r�`yafs • p '1'.. s,`- Jr'.�.I�.� \`/� .f�r�.. r9 7 r .� �!� ..I, ��- .1 11 .�.� l yY �✓i� �x�t, \-111 z�.mi ' r. •4+}:l�.n .rR �; +r , > i u,�,e ,d-. s� • -�' .. :,^�/��.�� '��� �y[ ,. _. �. r \`._ ,��.'IK'r� � r .K ':•��• _ Lr S: �i i. yam,-•_•?.��r '�;•�- 'f".iaF„�3`""'�A' t< €,r. y*a ''."- -- \y 11, J: r. 1..t.S..A `1`:G'�4' ,� /+�7 ai �Os:y _Y Y.: ji t�l \. � (,�r �� � ��i,���l---':" - t� 'm� .�� 1 i{�S r°` �{ -: (•�Etts( '�'GJ'.�. {'��.. }r `r n43 ;F lfl. r �✓-FC ''�, ,rsi(� _ iktC,f~-�c.. `_ k 'a" n/ei sk li"•L• J " ��tt __ _ t �'Y• p \-:"'� (F VI! stlb tt r ,y - 1.gg l � s V ,,. - _ . — w,`-T S' f ti F3" R - @'.?•.'n!2;- i ,,.. F „ ! �.onis.� - 'i'•\ \�' r-` ,f' 1,S' ` �' `� " 11;4��' � �' ' "�� ! t s` 'a xtr., `'4!It\1sr b �! i�'.\:- ``•�.--�%\ `; -'. ,. .� :\ ice y jq, _,�+?(� i" ��i� "@...+,et6.^tF ,may;• ' _:'' �. %" `" '�.,�'!' lit ..C� y.,, y ��,.V•• /`�s.. �,,.2, ...3.5 iffr - .' v Iy.,." ` c` �„�,rvr, ,,b i'C,�s '"Ai".� /s Sl�(✓' •, • 4� _ v ._ il, ,`,.i` \ ,.,r , � •`�\` % ��p2,ii,%'•, ( ..\ Y fi• 1�1:1".a.,,.„7„<rm,\*. e•'� �'..,.'`� �c 1p, 1 r1I,' � ,, r 3 ! _. � ' ` .�. � ,,(, •t � �'��� l��� • • �� � �'����, � •� x �`� `3' • 1�. 'L`,F - S��" r �'.0 >r' :r.1��tjv �'r� , � );, , .r• - ,.\ l ,,p,ITAT 5",rf' c7��� s -�, , q• 1- t Pi Gtc i:> i •' M .�:.: t_z• ,# � '` ' �� \ r ty,� 1 � vys?:.f r ) • ,r z .¢thS zr a i` ,{ J� %(j •. :�•' - ems, •a��/�.° ie.' Nl/.' 6 .l ,,,Y:.. 't'�I, tiJ' . - f' t' .� .=�- ,$o6,-`t t 0. .l.:.-,:Y �^'r f/T Yp'f`'. �.•' 'L,� �c\ ,t .,� ;r. �-r,/ r "+•�.1. iF ,O N ..�E '1 �� ar- fa >yi,a- �„ ���p;t(, � q ' : � v, � '‘,NI"''' � . 4, � '1 �{{ , 1 �.�._�u,,,P.9"r �-'�.�� Gl?�3•r � +'y��rr`y� �=..� ��J: i .ro ;8! ,n,m: `a ,ik era�r .. .� ,, ,e •."\$r le , �'. r r N' fi/✓. r ,rJ ,-,: jr J '#�:. �� .6e .. . \: � �, , \ Y ( `ssk.-. il, , L.aa • r�,.y.< . ,fix5 �\Zt'% A r �s . .'ji' 1 B J ., r ••' � �- .4 -1. %key/ 1+ k •!;' `�a 'k7 , d>r ',s§�; 'Vafy�"`...,;"�;�,r,,+��' „� L-s�; �:v- vc� d \. '�t.� .,. a�a, ,y'�+"' .� (`. +q 1. S r'r .7.,ts`�C*....� `�"wos, f'•��� ���s,,P ® 1 / �' ,'•\<.�.; , ice` ��^�+',`� � - ?,,V, ',, �'��/ r+':14 ,-� �,<1� �'r� a i�f: t� r cg' q S,+L . • • i 7�p►Vie e� .{ ®id ! j' \ - ' �` // ""C AS n;�, (y / 4t.fn'' -z . S',Wgvb'•t✓�'7'4 :7,y;! pY +E; trf r. , �? �r^�`: ''\;,\��'�C'�\^ V ' •• eA. ,� V\\ •*:"' 4 � y._y�S N : i.an,.4,+�..;n`,. �..s:n.5. ?.. 0' �9sa� 1 r� I� � �\� �l �g r I ,Y-, � �.. �,, mac, y axr�ssr y" ¢«qR Z ' a� \ 1' r _ `�~ ZC • Q �4c4ra` .u32 •^ n�,'y3fi R si :�' tIII E !-/. r I ' y. `'cv�� ,.g r/ 'l_,, 1!i� t' y, ,- `'"""'w!F'�d�✓- �,abi T , -110 '�l::it, I . i . � � • • `. , i t a�r�'s� ��.1r� (h `'o. +b`>� � ���!Q}fy' �'- 'rx ..IiI,..Wi rr� .tl.t+, \' ' r;• �''!.y \ �lri'4��\ mot % > ,/(',���' .�f ` �. .\� `�/ � y.5 .1✓"f')• ,,r..' T ""1�., , 1: :\ \� •^ � /1s�,� tr',r 3si� lAr. {{. l.7 c� s� rsr o- . ' • • • �kliitt s•' J y� �Si fir` Y.:. \ t T�'- J Y r .a#�S z i•�. as -� `1• E` 1!(y"'.\ '�' •i L� -:. �/ rpM1 .✓ , +',,,„. w'a.t,t ,�,. ' `r.st i :.!_ ; \ .. ' � :j nth % A,. \ s �a « pFr 'v� Sy ? . wwv t�Mill • • }�� „ • \!I(!.1. 6•4 lV:i ( • `c�;ti l c�9 . Rtau�3!i sky. a��s "• ... �y�►�j, �� � Ls�.fad\ IN • a \� �^l ? S yrt ,;+z .4!• w �n�f„ Ysb • ,}'W►'.,.�lN`M1.h 16 �.! '� iki +t ..l`6t�� �. , _ r>'. f L, �`• .. • •_ t ,+� 0". // ....,'�,.. ,r„pz,'.t- , ,:. ,q;� 1 R@n C •r, rr.. _ :s-�- � , �:ll ' :.-,i'�� _.,..s'..: "�' atsg: �,�$-'y � -T "'�l-S' wry. - \,,•, ,r,..}',j i''` ,1 - �+ , :qye, . •,•i'} .. : , .,- • y,:i•-•.- . ,, ,1(0... 1 ' • -.----- •.• .: i'l-•',',,,!,:.:•.,;:•-•: '',,...,‘,‘,;-......\:•••..........,‘,...'1,.\\CT.,..,,...,7•---:.-----"' . - ' ''''''.1141'3'''''''''''' ''''-4;... •'.*•-: ' --1-47F;t1 .:•-•-• •V1,;.&,1 ••••- : ::.\-••-•••••.3-, ....-0.571 "1-4111M-7...\4.7 '''.'e...--••• %:•• .' '''' • si;•C,'••,r.:.,, ::•!•.:••).';',t1' 11"./' . • '. ‘,.'•'•,' . ..., ::'-• . •. . 4' ------ 4 .AA . . • 'At!..:. -.V7' '.-• "Aliksz4 t \'� / hp� tt�i yb `f"q it � .. ..R /f/ �1 L�-,i?' ' �\`'•\ `u t /�:'' (L , ;•'� .it i s h. •'dam.�/ •n.� _ __ ;"..,. ! \ .`S\h, f�\ \( •\y • ,1� t, ..,: \.:\ ` .,7_ . a,. , �, \' V .'lei� _ .'�.` �.,'.n ,1' • �\ .. . „\ .11118. � ,;�,.,. .> y''�'' a.;J • .,�/ '.' n "` .,,.(� h.V w�•�'..�u..: •Gam,\„fyy'`j,Y t T�f�L .yT•�, _ -'�x .-�'�" r • .��a1 • / \ �\\ ! /.,./` ,. `"sK'i,� y.4 tl /,1 , 1 1 - �,2'> n,,-- rdpnl.., ••f,0���.i �'``�.i` .`a Yi.. .�.r . ... . _ '.J {- 1--),,_. �� .-C � �'_. t+ 't`.,cy -'; I' ���._!-` ' %Sv.., 9�1s� `••+ r+"\l a, Jt't�\� S StU '•4•Wd nth mil. ` ' \� 'r'"t. :•, • �.: Wf1'r ltC ` �.��+J , ( (r:. .) � �'f`�=3( , �� 69SE�.��\ 4',�` �, / ! .� F _( f it \ �yt ' V�`?� sii. ii\ A.�T • mil,zr �i� ; � .ji F>'•^ '; .. ��::, L\\-.f �.\ ..� ^.,,�N \�;.•7N�~~' - �� : :''�\ j •4.'' 1/1111r11111 �O1 I ytYG�v ''1C. ���.�+��1, - - o ��W wr�',' c\: l% /•"i, C I( - i / • v :. .,:tr.„,,, . I :: (�; �0, .1 .jn�; �:.. gyp, •� .. i ' v4 ik. , , :' I ..r .,, • 1 1f2 urn- laThe boundaries of the sensitive areas dis- pros/Ton c�r��yrd played on these maps are approximate. 6,�za i 1 i 1 f Additional sensitive areas that have not been mapped may be present on a devel- J� • MILE opment proposal site. Where differences A.� : occur between what Is Illustrated on these maps and the site conditions,the actual pre- sence or absence on the site of the sensitive area - as defined in the Sensitive Area Ordinance-Is the legal control. - '. `�4} `�\ ..}1 '�t l�.'`6'.. % • • tNY ,in; til� f��' ��.1 :�\ _` �- ���j;Nl `.� - _ - • 1 ) i- \\' �''>I. I - tip. t .- \�1® ! .5,. , ,1° ''-, - ,l• '"' ' 1 •!` it \♦ '.\ ®® fis Cam,`/ C ,, / \ .. ...eV ,-,-, �.,•;,,kk ti' - `a, �.J ILL\"� - 1;�q® �� ►tij vim•/ - �1f ( 21 .d'.\ ��� r7 I , 'N. ,-7 :.: 41� \� ` 1 i l I 1 :[i t ,l'', 1 CA l, - -. _�.1 ��f nott le, r_ } <_< �.. .,} e r k' -, ' _fi r �: • Y' � • \ `,. `'.`.t;b. , ',.t,•r • - _`,I' µ' , ` .i / '� t s! 'R�'" .ma r7 aF.e`,:a:. f ;, „_ *ia;:, • \\- ,, o� Z '',. �j ,, (\/'/ � ‘ .7 `.. ` `: c. o , y +" —..,-,--.A . ,\.,r ..-A; t\ ,� '( .- 1` .ti. s ..,/N... 'i \I ,\-1;� � '\ �+' t 2`i Ki" 'f" I '..,p >-$t J ‘Niiiti ?r: Qft. •_ .:>/� -Z-• ; •c4�0 t/r=,/J�' } r/ � ° �y ]j��.�y, te. �s► \ a S :, ��` a ,_ N• n, ,-.. ; ��:> '."^-.e. _ % • ,�1 ,' 'f�$+�f�l `3� r % \C 'c . f✓'rJ,�",,- S IA :c:-.16110Mik!..• ':'‘)-'''‘ :'" V a.'s%::-.: -._ :.--k,V':.:-,,,''..\-. 4 ss':;:,.A.,,-• 4,.,- ./. ., • • .1...; ,. .:,,, ..(,,,. ,/_:,-1• , , '\ 4 -:'-'-,;:-. ' ----e ._?' }I�T' ��,� E39'�l �� i,�d 41. � . :. �, l v.;.�. �. Yt'. 7-7 .,.,i-. ,.( �� I ; �✓lY:'• '.:\�.:\'/ tom_ , (1 rft.,....,,,,..,,,:17,,7524italt ,‘, ,z.!•.:\ N.>,'''' iti,); \ _ ,..,„,„,,,,\__.:.....-r, ,, _ , 7 ,,,, _ ; .:7,-.,7\. . . . . NIN.1- ..1/4„ . ... „..„, ..„..,„ ...,..,. ( ., •,,,.. ,.. ��i 1 14it:411'C 'q�.� s: _ .\ • I K ( .fw�':(�; ' /�-'•)r .gym '��- /tom / .>, Ai �'�`.' :,'; :-.t./S' :,, ,iK '�`pp1? ms. � \ ;ai rV'�e�,::. � ,�. ? ...� .�: :'\.,:"j�- �`���'•� ��,�%", y'�. � �,3�� ,i Lem:} �`s offiri,46 .••=. R � _�`. ram. \-• .— ';\ �: a: A. I .. -$,,, il,,to' \Z I r ' ' f_l •f �' - ,-i O• Vi11 �'• pig_ \ __ \ 1 v (/ i '� tt, t.^ r J, "]7�� '�°� \ \\` '-,.,.�•., '+ i f • 1', k I, Ty: Y�;'t 1 , .. f .• r^,,,r'n�`1 ��� EllIP� , i %: w : '4,r \r� ;'' \ ,\ :� \°1.'1 I I ��,,,pp r.\'_ _ - R'�� �'� �'. •� �:� :� ,` ' \ �`�f�' is �i�l} i fl' . ;• .. g 1 ` r` `. I \ 1\ r . \• \ ' .i� � _ i l��'1 {.. .'V'l ,1 _'''F;..,. /ly . • ' � _ i. \ '`�„ ,_ •_ a •_t —� ,c�,�av1 �.".,. �.r ^.4.,"4 \ \ ., ... I\ . •:\-.' mi ,� \,..` it,,', . , �'- .: ��. ,.� ,:rf{�•�.'' j, vI~rr�l! rif 1. r�.. % .1' - ''' i h .15.. .Ip to rOa .!( ill�. w.�:.+ �i \\ aa;\I ��• '� Jl� {\, :fib Th //7 / 71 `' � l .y-� �., �: ,�,�, � \ • ;,_,,,,,„ . \ ,„,,,,,;‘,,,,,....Q-•,.. N•-:.'„,:. ' . - ••• , ‘,11: ,'"..:..::...:,..4.7.;!,:;,. ,T.,.. 7!1.41.41,: .._;;,.,_,: f.isr,P.,.., ,,,,<,,..:::,:-----. '...... ''':' •'t '40,0.,„,.'...:.,,,,;.31..,, • ;9,..„.• .,,,.::.\..s, ,.2... ,.,.....41,,i,,.„,-).e'.,,c(..',-,,,-__-__,-.-.s. ,., ..‘,.,.:_.--„, .;,-,.,:,.......: ..:.;. ,_1.,...;. . ,N ....„.a.,. ..am,. . :,-,,.. . .2.,,'.. Ai: ;4'''''..'`,"?':;•-•''': r) ) !:-. lir 7:414-7.. 7,r.'1'17%','- Z'',' : ,: 0- 7-7;-,,........,,N) i t.e....; !...-7,mst,. • fi., r, ,..:, ,•,,,..........0, • ••ki..',L4a'N"\,..,,-,,, --- • Ia :2?Or, v rau ter:m• 1 1/2 0 1 The boundaries of the sensitive areas dis- One- hundred-year floodplalns extend tie- played on these maps are approximate. yond those shown on maps. Flood In- J II imase I Additional sensitive areas that have not surance Rate Maps do not always show the been mapped may it present on a devel- floodplaln to the headwaters of streams. Year OOdi' MILE N opment proposal site. Where differences ontse 1 G occur between what is illustrated on these maps and the site conditions,the actual pre- I sence or absence on the site of the sensitive area - as defined in the Sensitive Area - • ill Il b \:) ° c ■ v. ,a, y. .•_a, ::: ``-. -ti _ —.-'. I r' - •a akVINkr'.• •";Cli:, :11' 4,tr---- . V, c /,''.:' ,-.s..:,,-,.-T-iv,‘•,-,:::- —, . • •'``.:.sk.(.• l• -4141v4 r i,..io...•-"w' ' _J,:r -/ - :. .) • i , --.;-...::-.,.\,•— r„ -A, .,, •• l i / -- r1411 \ ''' , —14at v.,' ... : .,. ..\. ,,..„..„,, _ , ,. % .,......ci- ...7 ... LI i CI'. ‘i ..'' ':(i‘.,..;,.,,e%,_.?....a4 .s7...A:,:;, /", it: ,.:....i c:''• ?'''/' ''''"..?'''\•;'--.7:,\.\'2.:_'::'-:,. ...: .'..19.K''''..-.. \\1111.811. '''..411IIIC''',N if • ''' ( . ' . . , ••' , . i 1V . • .• . . Iii* ::',.;,,,,,... .•: r '-'-. -1-..k),;"- `-, \ ,..,-)r, '..) 1 (I.' ,"-• ..._.L.- ` '---s:-- \ .\\ \ 'VA'i...‘‘.,.. -'-',c-paw II Nik.!..k '',';''.. 1 .1 VIA ' . ' • ea %,,,‘S. .'- .• 411116: / _ ..ismi.s•P•777,„:-... . -.1 ‘1,•,.:1, c .A,,,\.i .k!..,.: L-_, ..,‘;,--) i, \ \\,*.,...:. :----4 If 1 \' 1 � r: ` ` / r-TibbitsCr'0 'a ('-• .J !kp,4kd n I %, ? r z, '"�aiv.•• ,-, 'it -\ ,r-;c . ,• \ '`i' J 1 :.?(l f� �:_tl sg-• r� F;C_ : ts� , �'�� HJ ' � -<. -. _:'\'‘.%J ',- ', ' i - \\--9 • oCd I • 'ti' `��?• '-,��®�?8 atilw' � r fifi��,'+f�r') 'r.✓ ''." -7 .r tsfAL ,. •,...:, ...• .• ,„,,. ..: . _ -- .,, J :� - j,1l .�•.1 fir, r'r' :r ,,,.,., ... , .11..,..,. .:. . , , 2.,„ ,......„...1.,-7,, ,,.., .... „_., l;r*+i m1/4..,..„ .. ,7zro - -,,\ \,� 'a. , ,~ \- - - - ,,a♦62br . — w '',;` y.;,;. �StE.� • • .',I1 a ,.�, :rF ;.•4"\, 'i�:'C: ' �''\'' `i /rt''" I .f.([P. \''. -... V,••+• ••., 'rm'L:.-i`e. i y..:- .---- -'�, '� Allis■ r, a �e ; `, ' l - I • ' '4./ 7 -. •::; ,::' , `� /! . •",i �/ ' '�\,\' ,' ,�� S Cr,,g _ �,J'' 3:- 1 tt• /_ oaf { ,. ,d`- • ( \ w, / - ..- :., •o •�. 4, eY d Ill l per.. s) ` —r .E� 5" � .■• ._. ,\' I-A _ ' f="',+a.•7/. 3,27 • ( r - \'g' ',---qt,.- ,.. �.' ��;• '-*�}' ,'-).'; �t�`"C/._ .'7'�i9!��, 1; V � -�il�ltia `�f \ I�,. l �' �ol \' :� `'l !: )' IQ 1 li 7 +�;'/� j ^ - �...�.. �. •1 •�j S J 2 t� � (!� "���.A \ \ ,�" \ -^ ` � '\,,f.,1< �` .�,��{�., TG.( 11/�'ffr � -'i,.,. ., . _ , 4bPr• '\, t' ,. \._, V• y � _, gr-•E .� � nl l" ' = T f IGrt Q�Or. � =� �(1. [ .. .,: 1Tr � �' �• ` - \ [3�� .l 1,-• 3.' -'— �7C= ^tz sissition; .,1 4..:".:.ri''j.\...so'0.11 'f.-....-..'-‘.."''''';'.i'5 ('. " "� t>!it ,'� .J - • - .( Y�__—'�`-� Fr' *.J'I `F'"._ \ , y�z i,i .il,. 7V9N� . leis , . :> ` i . ,, : `,,,: M' " )\ . •- .•nC i •r '" tt . � '.��q \ :- :,,,,.,, V�. -. - \I .'b�+�:•.s m<`••'Y i i p ra T�.,°rya ® ► :a e�\ �. °+tom- 1' � 9 "�• 'IVJ'i R� j '+ �� 'GJ /7 �. �, ..( -- - - _ \- .. 1113 'i.. :: - .�- .11,E :� _:;, :, . :_:. : N\ i\,1 i ll' , ,•'\'-_' 6' • 1 3 • sl; . . ® 1 • c �, ;�1 Ni b\ .: 't -- - -; --. _. .. ���'", - •, ",i'.-- - ,. — • � _ ::"'„., .'-\��';� a il.:_':•. .r - ----- - .::. ..' �`, r���s• v `� '�!_- °''/(' mot, .. .��'`',. `r r ,\-...� ryl, ' ;l. /-.`� . _\ ,' T'•'„�\:i"'�r�ti�` �i • ,„„„0: '. ':‘.--;:: 1:/:....--:; --•.--- -.7:41;'.." :" -.- - • '91'' . ;-: ',..-0 . .-- ,., , _ .-.,. .,;- . .• . • ...' - -- .. \ . ,^- -• „i......t........ 1 1/2 0 1 The boundaries of the sensitive areas dis- playedan on these maps are approximate. "a" or "b" designation are included in the v,/ • Additional sensitive areas that have not King County Wetlands Inventory, The �■" "'" been mapped may, be present on a devei- locations of wetlands designated'"a" have MILE r■ opment proposal site. Where differences been verified on the •site by a variety of ry occur between what is illustrated on these sources. Wetlands designated "b"are map • - maps and the site conditions,the actual pre- ped in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 03/18/96 16 :23 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9601140 Amount : 2 . 56 03/18/96 16 :23 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #25886 BARGHAUSE Init : LN Project # : LUA96-037 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 162305-9111 Site Address : 3209 NE 4TH ST Total Fees : • 2, 752 . 56 This Payment 2 . 56 Total ALL Pmts : 2 . 56 Balance: 2, 750 . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 2 . 56 ***********************.***************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 03/18/96 16 :24 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9601141 Amount : 2, 750 . 00 03/18/96 16 :24 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #NONE EMERALD CI Init : LN Project # : LUA96-037 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: , 162305-9111 Site Address : 3209 NE 4TH ST Total Fees : 2, 752 . 56 This Payment 2, 750 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 2, 752 . 56 Balance: . 00 *****************************************.*********************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 2, 000 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0019 Variance Fees 250 . 00 - %-031, SA ,e.c..r (W ) I , 4- - I _ I , \q/I DEVELOPMENT PhNN,NG Lam•-� I - � I APR 5 7996 RECE FY ED - THE TRANSPO GROUP � , I I I I , � I TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • fot Renton Chevron/McDonald's Co-Brand Facility - - - - I _ I 1 I Prepared for: Lakha Investment Company: • April 5, 1996 • I , � I I , � I f TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS for Renton Chevron/McDonald's Co-Brand Facility Prepared for: Lakha Investment Company April 5, 1996 Prepared by: The TRANSPO Group, Inc. • 14335 NE 24th Street, Suite 201 Bellevue, WA 98007-3737 (206)641-3881 FAX: (206) 747-3688 r � TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 Project Description 1 Study Scope 1 EXISTING AND WITHOUT-PROJECT CONDITIONS 4 Street System 4 Traffic Volumes 4 Traffic Operations 5 Traffic Safety - 5 Transit Service 8 Non-Motorized Facilities 8 PROJECT IMPACTS 9 Project Trip Generation 9 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment 10 Traffic Volumes 13 Traffic Operations 13 Site Access Analysis 13 Non-Motorized Facilities 16 MITIGATION MEASURES APPENDIX A- Level Of Service Definitions APPENDIX B - Level of Service Results APPENDIX C -Traffic Volume Data FIGURES 1. Site Vicinity 2 2. Site Plan 3 3. AM Traffic Volume Summary 6 4. PM Traffic Volume Summary 7 5. AM Site Access Analysis 11 6. PM Site Access Analysis 12 TABLES 1. 1996 Existing and 1997 Without-Project Intersection LOS Summary 5 2. Project Trip Generation 9 3. 1997 With and Without-Project Intersection LOS Summary 13 4. Driveway AM and PM Peak Hour LOS Summary 14 5. Queuing Analysis with the Proposed Project 15 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Chevron/McDonald's Co-Brand Facility April 5, 1996 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the traffic impact analysis prepared for the proposed Chevron/McDonald's co-brand facility, located in Renton, Washington. The purpose of the analysis is to identify potential transportation-related impacts associated with the proposed development and to identify measures to mitigate potential impacts. Project Description Lakha Investment Company is proposing a co-brand facility in the Renton Highlands. The project would be located on the southwest corner of the Monroe Avenue NE/NE 4th Street intersection, as shown in Figure 1. The site is currently occupied by Alexander's Auto Auction. The proposed development would include 12 pumping stations, a 1,919 gross square foot-(gsfl convenience market, a 2,431-gsf restaurant with drive-through, and 40 parking stalls. The site plan is shown in Figure 2. Three access driveways would serve the site: two on Monroe Avenue NE, and one on NE 4th Street. Study Scope The scope of the study was identified by transportation staff from the City of Renton Development Services. The Monroe Avenue NE/NE 4th Street intersection, roadways adjacent to the site, and site access driveways are included in the study area and subsequent traffic analysis. The traffic analysis describes traffic volumes occurring during two time periods: the weekday AM peak hour(7:15 to 8:15 a.m.) and the weekday PM peak hour (5 to 6 p.m.). Traffic volume impacts were analyzed during these conditions because adjacent commuter traffic is higher than during any other time of the day. • 96700.00/JLS/96700R2 , The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 1 • . • 4.4) Z 1—y Ism NE 215T _II a Zip © 2 +, \ _-•!aee 2900 ST g• a. - mix a 4 1 �1 g 5 t-R T 1 . <F- e a � sET,osm i G Y - 03«'y 4 . i y RHE 20Tx � a��t•••,-',' i.st , � .. 2303 K r `�V' t i, • iiiii,11 i e '6'e4` L SE 06M ST. NE I. ^i�T'i'�Y' u ,.... W 14 .RA J - 1� t w PARK -�� iiii �- ,�. _ et : 8u ___ - a� -.�•_4,H,4 64, ,n sr �. NE 0...4.3 • `�_ � �$ z400, < -,r 'a NS,T .,ne , r♦ F -Nr 9QAi i :j I ST g m NE 7M PL} tstx ST La K]m�sr *�iams i' - i 6ENE .,1., L, O ta,5 !!W (v _<' It � S®`i';'. ' '- / MAXI& �1 �� NE �_,1211 . I NE 'LI 12TH ST - Tz - 1 25-.. Il S MAW PAR \ 2108 PO•� ME '�� ;2 14300 - - _ 1 OLT R M \v' fr.A.\*Fit10.1111t1/4RICFOR + �1�3n rutx M 1 N i cf Ir , 'Jl/,.■RiniE A11 �1��!.ilk 1��u'/8 - =� -t Q�3" r�<I < ._-. ' •i -i NE 10M ST � Q likli 11:_� r - ^iiir!m. tar:" • \ / 2; �;� Arlimellippligium:.ir � ST 1 •VIIsE ST.�'FL KINANIS, , _ itr , i• _ Di YE int E Et i < NJV 17M CT '<I;' , IE. —� 9(10 � 'w 1121ST ST 4,47‘4 . a!t:121 ti,MIElik 1 4$1111711 7,f&111i." E��Nic_©,. ���r :l_iiiii < m■® •i E� — -- _ w ., SE 124TH S < )1, F Q nnt. � �i 1s- ',f AY NE <g, S '� . 1 1 K .J ��1A :.1�.y 1 iE 125TH • I,ii,,,.,ty ,.,,,., 4,.. .., ! Li MINOSOR < TEAM C4C I dt t:€. ti iiiiii `401:,:, 0 n' HI,. •�•■, NE■ - --- 4TH ' E - ST 1'i • SE • 14000 SE I29TH kEE774C .' ea, �` • ,-g ' - NE 3RD CT PL IPU. NE L NE— ]gym r , N • Lr— _S 132ND < �, �- :, �- ,a ��, , , SITE E>N ,, 15 „aa ST E •�r6f7Q1�IY^ / �� .1.. . sEI51MIF ," t .�` %h 4,. wY ',�M V u-:.i .�i/6 .\ �✓ •'OLlYR ESTATES SE Y u -s1 .s- �1iwv �tlroT. I6 MP O ' 13SM a sT ,S • ��' /, %oARK t 'e3 [fMTFRY t ST I sr vt—�11ee�aI /��j •' - • • ' •N •O' �P SE- 136TH iió2 1 •g 4 i� _ l.. \ k I k �a � L ..E-11mN S<T'�' \•.Jc \9`e _ SE 5TH M� I Jr r�r�.i . ti, . B e4. •o -� �Y v-- J. s N�wn 5 �� 8 `' �' \ / \�- 6' ' I . EM SE 141ST d ©©S�ST re -� 142ND ST s I . l , ' &. •S 7M CT NIP1flA00 ,� •�` s,q 1 S`'�. 2a Y14 `d a vt V' .� RWOSIOE �� '...... a V • e . sT.e.a 24 PARK • .l .S7,_-�Sr144118004_ Vd • 144 •RF <.. ST vi ri -IT S Anratn ,st.,h1°4C< \ a 16, s ER gMAPLEW00D . i 11M Si I. M COURSE i . + .. .4„,x,,,,,.,, ., . ..,.. t. : ,,„..., -. ,G„,,.: 20 � ' Y 21 - g x. . .. �\` • .�� 1. j•FNTo P 6 P 22 ,it • e snit g Q�SE• f• 16C1� '� o ^= '.. T \,. st 1' F — • 96700.00 REV 3/18/96 - K:\CAD\96700\GRAPHIC(A) • RENTON CHEVRON/ Figure 1 McDONALDS Site Vicinity NE 4th St/Monroe Ave NE The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 1 • 44) - - - _ a1h street - - - - - _L_ • • I ' • jrlt 1ditr 1 2 15.1€H 1 • 3 I M 1 I 4 L.J. � 13,C z 1 3Md f dd r 6 11 0 ® ill ®1aX • 1 ` 1 ; a x e ' a � I n 1 ®+« o a ( I 0 . 0 u�e_®J a 1 1 9 1 ,1 10 r 1 _ • 11 + t 1 NWIMAL FACE .l 12 1 II 1 ill , t3 : I:S. +�_ ( W I7 V V 14 •1 ❑ 1 't40 R §I �m7 e o fSd to--a-1% nitI I C-STORE \` Wd 0 I t `CASMF7t .� is / 1 MP° P11 j1 rIP PHASE 118 "--- / , / 23 _ .•► 1 ..]:141 g 11 29 / 1 II 14 ii‘l‘4‘''4. 4 1‘4 I 1‘4‘4 4‘4 1‘ 1 ---.-' l a 1 • a-1C X 16 P%L�196.00' . WASH ENCLOSURE 96700.00 REV 3/18/96 K:\CAO\96700\GRAPHIC(8) RENTON CHEVRON/ Figure '2 McDONALDS Site Plan NE 4th St/Monroe Ave NE The TRANSPO Group, Inc. Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Chevron/McDonald's Co-Brand Facility April 5, 1996 EXISTING AND WITHOUT-PROJECT CONDITIONS This section describes the existing and future without-project transportation con- ditions in the vicinity of the site. These include the street system, traffic volumes, traffic operations, planned improvements, transit service, and non-motorized facilities. A review of existing conditions provides the basis for estimating future without-project conditions. A comparison of the future without-project scenario to the future with-project scenario provides the basis for evaluating the project impacts. Street System The existing street system in the project site vicinity is described below. NE 4th Street is a five-lane, east-west principal arterial with a posted speed of 35 mph. Sidewalks exist on both sides of the street except along the property frontage. Traffic is controlled by a traffic signal at its intersection with Monroe Avenue NE. NE 4th Street is adjacent to the site on the north and would serve one access driveway. Monroe Avenue NE is a two-lane collector arterial. This north-south roadway has a posted speed limit of 30 mph. It is adjacent to the proposed site on the east and would serve two access driveways. Based on review of the City of Renton's Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), no improvement projects were identified as planned in the study area. Therefore, no planned improvement projects were assumed in the future without-project analyses. Traffic Volumes • Existing 1996 weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes in the study area are summarized on Figures 3 and 4, respectively. The traffic volumes are based on manual turning movement counts conducted by Traffic Counts Consultants (TC2) on March 13, 1996 at the Monroe Avenue NE/NE 4th Street intersection. The traffic volume data is provided in Appendix C. Forecast 1997 without-project traffic volumes were developed for the weekday AM and PM peak hours, as shown in Figures 3 and 4, respectively. As directed by city staff, an annual growth rate was to be developed based on previous AM and PM traffic counts performed at the Monroe Avenue NE/NE 4th Street intersection on June 1, 1994 by The TRANSPO Group, Inc. However, comparing the total entering volumes at the Monroe Avenue NE/NE 4th Street intersection during both the AM and PM peak hours showed that traffic volumes have decreased by 3 to 19 percent in the two-year period. Therefore no background growth was assumed to occur on the site vicinity between 1996 and 1997 to develop the 1997 without-project traffic volumes. However, two permit pending projects (a.k.a., "pipeline") were identified by City of Renton staff: The Village on Union, and Forrest Creste. Weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volume estimates for these two projects were included in the 1997 without-project condition. 96700.00/JLS/96700R2 The TRANSPO Group,Inc Page 4 } EXISTING (1996) 10 ruji c7.-- 01) 166< 395 __! k_ 163 II ill 365—• -6-1022 1 �596 43 ) ( 34 • 88 f t 67 80► +7 24 tc • • NE 4TH ST 1 1 T ( p-0) / if f 1219 38 802 1 1 0 I 437 i ri a: s:ru,.t ....:.o•:.a n 187 •i ;\tr3rs fY.; .ti�r3:>n':t:r i �100 1 0 1997 WITHOUT PROJECT 10 z 1�1� 166 a 395 __) ' 163 • 0:") 377 1063 , *Z'' 1596 —.— �-43 f 34 8-t3 S. - ► 208 8 4 �208 24 138 NE 4TH ST 1209 1 ( 0"/ IT -'•-1260 38 814 .11) . 0 I 11 449 {. tiff f.:}`:.•.•hI {Y{r•,< , 0 .v�87 :.Iiiiii ...,:,.i.fi :s!.F•`:? .+:: ::.,tf f Viz 0 1997 WITH PROJECT • 27 z ( ' 57 '.,o 372 -0-1031 � --0---0-602 48 ) ( 81 . z 790 -.6-1203 62 53 • ...../ ( NE 4TH ST 1 36-) r S -1269 64 826 16' 111 �� 7 184 457'-• i . <<:::x0:,:`::.:.::. LEGEND Oi*61 to'::k:.:.:>:::::: 1 5 1 t 131 t%ii1� �:i•s 5� PM PEAK ;�44.:.•'_�. v? 4: 30 +85 TRAFFIC 96700.00 REV 4/5/96 t101 'Y DAILY K:\CAD\96700\GRAPHIC(C) RENTON CHEVRON/ Figure 3 • McDONALDS AM Traffic Volume Summary NE 4th St/Monroe Ave NE • Tne TRANSPO Group, Inc. EXISTING (1996) W 3 i 01) z > r 265 a 305 115 • '� •1038—� +-499 Z t421 11 1 1354 638 1346 637 --.. -..� f 13 y NE 4TH ST 6i3 2 t T1 10/ ( r-615 I . -e. g 2 2 1 ► • 1182 l 1 ' 1356 18 , Rtiiltre:Z.,:•..M • :.. -• t23 0 1997 WITHOUT PROJECT 1 135 ' �, 129 • Z �jL 265 a 305 U 115 i g 1 W ` —► 421 1085 -523 11 .-- 1 •- � 1 1401 662 1393 661 --11. -a-- —. f 13 I 9........„,) '_ NE 4TH ST t 2 9 V 1-0 IP. -Ns-639 i -03 s1 (► _ (► 1229 i 1403 5 1 12 2 ' 18 . ikn:%.tn;:•i•:•}: ti f f::i yti:•i: .,ik}i}.}yiE (i-flt23 • • - 1997 WITH PROJECT . 11 W '�j 130 z 267 a 293 _) U 111 till 1061—'- 4-509 t422 23 C 21 z ) i 1351 �--646 21 I 39 NE 4TH ST 6f 54� �10 �--641 18 ........„2 i 1230-11".a. 1405 30 4� i 12 22 26 ^:f•`: z�'z.#. LEGEND '` t { µw 12 5—• PM PEAK :`<:::•::::&::::}.^• 0 j TRAFFIC • • 96700.00 REV 4/5/96 f23 • �XX DAILY 1 K:\CAO\96700\GRAPHIC(0) • RENTON CHEVRON!'" Figure 4 . McDONALDS PM Traffic Volume Summary • NE 4th St/Monroe Ave NE The TRANSPO Group, Inc. Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Chevron/McDonald's Co-Brand Facility April 5, 1996 Traffic Operations Existing and future 1997 without-project AM and PM peak hour levels of service were calculated at the Monroe Avenue NE/NE 4th Street intersections using methodologies published in the Highway Capacity Manual(Transportation Research Board, 1994). Level of service is used to evaluate and quantify operating conditions and traffic congestion at intersections. Level of service (LOS) values range from LOS A, indicating free-flowing traffic, to LOS F, indicating extreme congestion and long vehicle delays. Level of service is typically measured in terms of average delay per vehicle. This delay is typically reported for the overall intersection for signalized intersections and by approach for unsignalized intersections. Detailed descriptions of levels of service are provided in Appendix A. The existing and future AM and PM peak hour levels of service at the Monroe Avenue NE/ NE 4th Street intersection are summarized in Table 1. The detailed level of service results are shown in Appendix B. Table 1. 1996 Existing and 1997 Without-Project Intersection Levels of Service Summary 1996 Existing Conditions 1997 Without-Project Conditions Intersection LOS1 Delay2 V/C3 LOS Delay V/C Monroe Ave NE/NE 4th St AM Peak Hour C 18.4 0.87 C 18.9 0.88 PM Peak Hour B 11.1 0.61 B 11.1 0.62 1 LOS=Level of service. 2 Delay=Average delay per vehicle in seconds per vehicle. 3 WC=Volume-to-capacity ratio. As shown in Table 1, the Monroe Avenue NE/NE 4th Street intersection currently operates at LOS C during the weekday AM peak hour and LOS B during the weekday PM peak hour. This intersection would continue to operate at the same levels of service in 1997 without the project during both the AM and PM peak hours. Traffic Safety To quantify traffic safety in the study area, traffic accident data were obtained from the City of Renton for the three-year period between January 1, 1993, and December 31, 1995. Based on the data provided, the Monroe Avenue NE/NE 4th Street intersection has experienced an average of 3 accidents per year. Adjacent to the project site, no accidents have occurred at midblock or driveway locations along either Monroe Avenue NE or NE 4th Street. Therefore, based on review of the traffic accident data, no significant safety problems have been identified in the study area. 96700.00/JLS/96700R2 The TRANSPO Group,inc. Page 7 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Chevron/McDonald's Co-Brand Facility April 5, 1996 Transit Service ! Transit service near the site is provided by Metro Transit Routes 107, 108, 111, and 147. The site vicinity is served by the four routes via Monroe Avenue NE and NE 4th. Street, as described below: Route 107 -This route serves the Renton Highland, Kennydale, Skyway, Rainier Beach, Holly Park, and downtown Seattle. Route 107 operates every 30 minutes during the commute periods of 6 to 9 a.m. and 3 to 6 p.m., and hourly during the remainder of the day. Route 108 -This route operates between Boeing Industrial, the South Renton Park-and-Ride, the Renton Highlands, Mercer Island, and downtown Seattle during the morning and evening commuter peak periods. Route 108 makes three stops on Monroe Avenue NE and NE 4th Street between 5:30 and 6:30 a.m. and three stops between 3 and 4 p.m. Route 111 -This route serves Lake McDonald, the Renton Highlands, the Renton Highlands Park-and-Ride, Kennydale, Newport Hills Park-and-Ride, and downtown Seattle. It operates from Renton to downtown Seattle during the morning commuter peak hours (5:30 to 8 a.m.), and from downtown Seattle to Renton during the afternoon com- muter peak hours (3:30 to 6:30 p.m.). Route 111 operates every 30 minutes in both directions. Route 147-This route serves Lake McDonald, the Renton Highlands, the South Renton Park-and-Ride, and downtown Seattle. Route 147 operates every 30-minutes during the commute periods of 6 to 8 a.m. and 3:30 to 6:30 p.m. The remainder of the day, this route operates every hour in both directions. The closest westbound bus stop in the immediate vicinity of the project site is located on NE 4th Street,just north of the proposed north site access. This stop has an existing bus shelter on the north side of the road. The closest eastbound bus stop is located on the south side of NE 4th Street, about 100 feet east of Monroe Avenue NE. Non-Motorized Facilities Existing pedestrian and bicycle activity near the project site are minimal. Adjacent to the site there are no sidewalks on the south side of NE 4th Street. However, on the north side of NE 4th Street, 5-foot sidewalks exist. Sidewalks also exist on the east side of Monroe Avenue NE east of the site. • 96700.00/JLS/96700R2 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 8 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Chevron/McDonald's Co-Brand Facility April 5, 1996 PROJECT IMPACTS This section of the report summarizes the traffic-related impacts that would be generated by the proposed development and describes the assumptions and methodology used to develop the project traffic volumes. Project Trip Generation Trip generation estimates for the existing site and proposed project were developed using actual tube-count data at the site driveways and trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation Report. The trip rates in the ITE report are based on empirical observations for many types of uses located throughout the country. Trip generation estimates for the proposed facility were based on the'number of pumping stations for the gasoline/service station and the square footage of the fast-food restaurant. Trip generation for the existing site, containing Alexander's Auto Auction, was based on actual tube counts taken at all three Site driveways in March of 1996 by TC2. The traffic count data is provided in Appendix C. Table 2 summarizes the trip generation estimates for the proposed facility, with a net reduction taken for the existing use. Table 2. Project Trip Generation ITE Vehicle Trips Land Use/Time Period Size Trip Rate Total Pass-by Internalization Net New Proposed Site: Chevron 12 pumps (100%) (75%) • (0%) (25%) Weekday Daily . 162.78 1,953 1,465 0 488 AM Peak Hour 10.06 121 91 0 31 PM Peak Hour 13.38 160 120 0 40 - McDonald's 2,431 gsf (100%) (60%) (40%) (24%) Weekday Daily 710.08 1,726 1,036 276 414 AM Peak Hour 55.87 136 81 22 32 PM Peak Hour 36.56 89 53 14 21 Existing Site: Alexander's Auction' N/A N/A N/A N/A Weekday Daily -323 -323 AM Peak Hour -8 -8 PM Peak Hour -52 -52 Total Net New Trips Weekday Daily 580 AM Peak Hour • 55 PM Peak Hour 9 1 Alexander's Auto Auction trips were based on weekday daily driveway counts performed by TC2. . 96700.00/JLS/96700R2 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 9 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Chevron/McDonald's Co-Brand Facility April 5, 1996 As shown in Table 2, the Chevron portion of the facility would generate 1,953 total daily driveway trips (121 during the AM peak hour and 160 during the PM peak hour). It is important to note that the project proponent indicated that a typical Chevron generates much fewer trips than indicated by the corresponding ITE trip rate, which includes data from many different fueling brands. Using the higher rate ensures a conservative analy- sis. A 75 percent pass-by rate was assumed for the Chevron, which is a standard pass-by rate used for fueling/convenience market facilities. The McDonald's portion of the facility would generate 1,726 total daily trips (136 during the AM peak hour, and 89 trips during the PM peak hour). A 60 percent pass-by rate was assumed for the McDonald's, which was documented in a study prepared for McDonald's in 1991, McDonald's Site Traffic Analysis Manual. The trips generated by the McDonald's were further reduced to account for the number of shared trips between the Chevron and the McDonald's that would occur during an average weekday. Since the project proponent expects this shared-trip reduction to be significant, we used a moderate 40 percent reduction to ensure a conservative analysis. It should also be noted that this 40 percent shared-trip rate was approved by King County traffic engineering staff for a traffic analysis currently being completed in King County for a similar facility. The existing site was found to generate 323 daily trips (8 during AM peak hour, and 52 during PM peak hour). These trips were subtracted from the net new trips gener- ated by the proposed project to determine the total net new trips generated by the site. The net impact of the proposed project would generate approximately 580 weekday daily trips, with 55 occurring during the AM peak hour and 9 during the PM peak hour. Project Trip Distribution and Assignment The project trip distribution is based on the potential market area and local travel patterns in the area. The resulting AM and PM peak hour trip distribution for the proposed Chevron/McDonald's co-brand facility is shown on Figures 5 and 6, respectively. Twenty- five (25) percent of the project traffic would be oriented to the north via Monroe Avenue NE. Another 30 percent would be oriented west via NE 4th Street, and 5 percent would be oriented to the south via Monroe Avenue NE. The remaining 40 percent would be oriented to and from the east via NE 4th Street. The project-generated trips were assigned to the vicinity street system based on the distribution pattern and the location of project driveways. Approximately 70 percent of the project traffic was assigned to the two driveways on Monroe Avenue NE, while the remaining 30 percent of the project traffic was assigned to the driveway on NE 4th Street during the AM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, approximately 60 percent of the project traffic was assigned to the two driveways on Monroe Avenue NE, while the remaining 40 percent of the project traffic was assigned to the driveway on NE 4th Street. 96700.00/JLS/96700R2 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 10 . e NEW TRIPS 8 w ri iaL N 8 a 1 LU + ot 6 2—► —-41 z a 2 -i� � 8 2---• 7 7 6 NE 4TH ST f 1 U r 1 +9 5 123 3 12__ -i �° 8-- 307 40% !OM" 6°_) 1 i° a PASS—BY TRIPS 9 w -7 Z �1�2 1 0% -15_} !___ -6 ow -7� t--33 3-) 39 z -lir -25--► -.- -12 31 9 NE 4TH ST 25 1- 3 21 54 12 6 36_ r-3 50% 4It25 111.!:::iiii:•;iii 29j i -2 CO 2T t • 0 TOTAL SITE TRIPS 17 La -7 2 La8 a -14 '�. -6 iw ► �-5— ---32 � t6 5-) 1) z -Itir • -23--► -+ -5 38 15 NE 4TH ST f 35 ( 4 +9 26 12 72 8 15 9 48.� 1 r-3 ii'r4 1 ` r 51 t31 ':s.ti: : 35...) + -2 , LEGEND 5 . PM PEAK 96700.00 REV 4/4/96 >. 3 V t — TRAFFIC K:\CA0\96700\GRAPHIC(E) 1 RENTON CHEVRON/ Figure 5 McDONALDS AM Site Access Analysis - NE 4th St/Monroe Ave NE The TRANSPO Group, Inc. • NEW TRIPS NLi 41) - 2aileilL1*--- L 0 t, % j 2 , 2 -lir , , 0—r � 0 1 NE 4TH ST -.I- 2) ( 0 -41--2 1 4 2 Io ij1j0 , � 40� .::.:.{.:...: 30% glitt, 0-) 7.,.) t 1 4: ::; 1 0 o) o . PASS—BY TRIPS 8 LaJ r2ija Q%os -4 4' -24=► <---14 c 12-) 18 zo -lir -- -40-•s. -14 8 29 NE 4TH ST 40-1 ( 5 16 ' 38 60% 1:) :.(76. . :.34.__! ) 0 4 f.:'.4.Ammam.a 0—) Cii) ili1 19 s . 23_.) t 0 0- . 0 - TOTAL SITE TRIPS Lair="310 :.... Lai Z JjL2 < -4 1 —► ---24 < --14 �1 12) ( 20 Riol -40—► I-14 8 30 NE 4TH ST �1_. 42) r 5 2 17 2 42 1 i 15' ' 16 35_) i0 ` '`rl 24� ) 0 • LEGEND 20 4 :ti+iv•i:;n;;:•ii:• v�i:ti'�iri�:ii:}.�{�Y: 96700.00 REV 4/5/96 07i t 5-0- PM TRAFFIC K K:\CAD\96700\GRAPHIC(F) 0 RENTON CHEVRON/ • Figure 6 . McDONALDS PM Site Access Analysis NE 4th St/Monroe Ave.NE The TRANSPO Group, Inc. Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Chevron/McDonald's Co-Brand Facility April 5, 1996 Traffic Volumes The project-generated traffic was added to the 1997 without-project traffic volumes to produce traffic volumes for 1997 with-project conditions during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The resulting weekday AM and PM peak hour volumes are shown on Figures 3 and 4, respectively. A comparison of project traffic to total traffic at the study area intersection was also analyzed to quantify the percent impact of the project on adjacent street traffic. Project traffic would represent less than 5 percent of the total 1997 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the Monroe Avenue NE/NE 4th Street intersection. Since peak hour traffic volumes typically fluctuate up to 5 percent on a daily basis, the increase in traffic from the proposed project would not be noticeable to the typical commuter during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Traffic Operations Table 3 summarizes weekday AM and PM peak hour levels of service for forecast 1997 conditions with the proposed project. Without-project levels of service are also shown for comparison. The detailed level of service results are shown in Appendix B. Table 3. 1997 With and Without-Project Intersection Levels of Service Summary 1997 Without-Project Conditions 1997 With-Project Conditions Intersection LOS1 Delay2 V/C3 LOS Delay V/C Monroe Ave NE/NE 4th St AM Peak Hour C 18.9 0.88 C 24.9 0.95 PM Peak Hour B 11.1 0.62 B 12.2 0.62 I LOS=Level of service. 2 Delay=Average delay per vehicle in seconds per vehicle. 3 V/C=Volume-to-capacity ratio. The addition of project traffic would not change levels of service at the Monroe Avenue NE/NE 4th Street intersection during either the AM or PM peak hours. Thus, based on the City of Renton's Policy Guidelines for Traffic Impact Analysis of New Development, no mitigation measures are required. Site Access Analysis The proposed project would have three full access driveways. Two driveways would be located on Monroe Avenue NE and one access driveway on NE 4th Street. Operating conditions at the driveways were evaluated by conducting level of service analyses. Table 4 summarizes 1997 AM and PM peak hour levels of service at the site driveways. The detailed level of service results are also shown in Appendix B. 96700.00/JLS/96700R2 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 13 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Chevron/McDonald's Co-Brand Facility April 5, 1996 Table 4. Driveway AM and PM Peak Hour Levels of Service Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Site Access Intersection LOS' Delay2 LOS Delay North Driveway/NE 4th St Northbound Left turn F >60 F >60 Northbound Right-turn A 5.3 B 6.2 Westbound Left turn B 5.9 C 12.4 Northeast Driveway/Monroe Ave Northbound Left turn A 2.6 A 2.3 Eastbound Left/Right-turn B 5.4 A 4.0 Southeast Driveway/Monroe Ave Eastbound Left/Right-tum A 4.6 A 3.7 1 LOS=Level of service for each movement approach of the intersection. 2 Delay=Average delay per vehicle in seconds per vehicle. As shown in Table 4, all turns at the site driveways would operate at LOS C or better with the proposed project, except the northbound left turn from the access driveway onto. NE 4th Street, which would operate at LOS F during both AM and PM peak hour conditions. This left turn movement would operate at LOS F primarily due to the high volumes on NE 4th Street during both AM and PM commuter peak periods. As a result, this site access driveway would likely operate with right-in/right-out movements only during AM and PM peak periods. However, during non-peak conditions throughout the day, left turns out of the proposed site driveway on NE 4th Street will not likely operate at LOS F. Queuing Analysis A queuing analysis was conducted to determine if queues from the Monroe Avenue NE /NE 4th Street intersection would extend south and west to the proposed site driveways on Monroe Avenue NE and NE 4th Street, respectively. The proposed northeastern driveway on Monroe Avenue NE would be located approximately 140 feet south of the Monroe Avenue NE /NE 4th Street intersection. The proposed driveway on NE 4th Street would be located approximate 130 feet west of the intersection. The queuing analysis was based on Equation 16.19 from ITE's Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handbook, Second Edition. The equation relates the average queue to the vehicle flow rate and the intersection's red time. The red time for this calculation was determined from optimized level of service calculations. Traffic queues with the proposed project were examined for both the northbound lanes on Monroe Avenue NE and the eastbound lanes on NE 4th Street. Both average queue lengths and maximum queues length were determined. Average queue lengths reflect the average queue that would exist during the weekday AM and PM peak hour periods. Maximum queue lengths were determined to reflect the worst-case typical traffic queue occurring during the weekday peak hours. Maximum queues were described as the 95th-percentile traffic queue for each tested movement. Table 5 summarizes the results of the queuing analysis, assuming one vehicle is approximately 25 feet in length. • 96700.00/JLS/96700R2 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 14 Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Chevron/McDonald's Co-Brand Facility April 5, 1996 Table 5. Queuing Analysis With the Proposed Project AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Movement Average Queue Maximum Queue Average Queue Maximum Queue NE 4th St-EB Left turn Lane 200 feet 275 feet 150 feet 225 feet - NE 4th St-EB Thru/Right Lanes 50 feet 100 feet 125 feet 175 feet Monroe Ave-NB Thru/Left Lane 75 feet 150 feet 25 feet 75 feet Monroe Ave-NB Thru/Right Lane 75 feet 150 feet 25 feet 75 feet Average queues for the eastbound left turn at the Monroe Avenue NE/NE 4th Street intersection would block the proposed driveway on NE 4th Street, since the driveway would be located approximately-130 feet west of the intersection. This means that, during typical weekday AM and PM peak hour conditions, the center, left turn lane would not be available for westbound left turns into the site, and left turns out of the site could be blocked. The eastbound through lanes, however, would not interfere with traffic attempting to turn right out of the proposed site driveway. Average queues for the northbound lanes at the Monroe Avenue NE/NE 4th Street intersection would not block the proposed driveways on Monroe Avenue NE, since the both driveways would be located at least 140 feet south of the intersection. The 95th-percentile (maximum) queue for eastbound through traffic would extend up to 175 feet west of the intersection. Thus during maximum queuing conditions, the proposed driveway on NE 4th Street could be blocked by queues on the west leg of the Monroe Avenue NE/NE 4th Street intersection. However, it is important to recognize that • the 95th-percentile queue represents'queues that would occur only 5 percent of the time. For example, of the 40 traffic signal cycles that would occur each hour, only 5 percent(2 cycles) would be subject to these conditions. Thus vehicles turning right out of the site driveway may be blocked during only a few cycles during a typical weekday. The 95th-percentile (maximum) queue for northbound through traffic would extend approximately 175 feet south of the Monroe Avenue NE/NE 4th Street intersection. This means that the northbound lanes could block the northernmost driveway on Monroe Avenue NE. However, only 5 percent (2 cycles) of the time would the site's northern driveway be subject to these conditions. Furthermore, since the southernmost driveway on Monroe Avenue NE would be located approximately 225 feet south of the intersection, this driveway would not likely be blocked at any time during the day. Based on the conclusions of the queuing analysis at the Monroe Avenue NE/ NE 4th Street intersection, left turns into and out of the site access driveway on NE 4th Street would not likely be allowed due to the traffic queues during both AM and PM peak periods. As a result, this site access driveway would likely operate with right-in/right-out movements only during AM and PM peak periods. However, left turns into and out of the proposed site driveway on NE 4th Street will not likely be blocked during non-peak periods throughout the day. 96700.00/JLS/96700R2 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 15 • Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Chevron/McDonald's Co-Brand Facility April 5, 1996 Non-Motorized Facilities Based on the lack of pedestrian and bicycle activity observed near the site, few if any project trips would be from pedestrians or bicyclists. However, some increase in trips associated with non-auto travel could occur as a result of the proposed project, but the increases are likely to be small. Consistent with the project site design, sidewalks would be built along the site frontage on both Monroe Avenue NE and NE 4th Street. r 96700.00/JLS/96700R2 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 16 ' . Traffic Impact Analysis for Renton Chevron/McDonald's Co-Brand Facility April 5, 1996 MITIGATION MEASURES This section of the report identifies potential mitigating measures that would offset or reduce transportation impacts for the proposed Chevron/McDonald's co-brand facility. Impact Fees. The City of Renton has an adopted Impact Fee Program. As mitiga- tion for a project's impact to the area transportation system, the City of Renton requires an impact fee to help fund future capacity improvements within the City. The impact fee is $75 per net new average weekday daily trip. The average weekday traffic volumes were developed based on the net difference between traffic generated by the existing site, and traffic generated by the proposed site. The net new average weekday daily trips are esti- mated to be 580, as shown in Table 2, which corresponds to an impact fee of$43,500. Local Off-Site Improvements. No local off-site improvements are recommended. Since the project does not degrade the level of service at any study area intersection for 1997 conditions with the proposed project, no specific roadway improvements are required. On-Site Improvements. Adjacent to the site on both NE 4th Street and Monroe Avenue NE, recommended frontage improvements include a minimum of 5 foot wide side- walks adjacent to the existing curb and gutter. 96700.00/JLS/96700R2 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page 17 Appendix A Level of Service Definitions Traffic Impact Analysis for the Renton Chevron/McDonald's Co-Brand Facility Appendix A Signalized intersection level of service is defined in terms of the average vehicle delay of all movements through an intersection. Vehicle delay is a method of quantifying several intangible factors, including driver discomfort, frustration, and lost travel time. Specifically, level of service criteria are stated in terms of average stopped delay per vehicle during a specified time period (in this case, the PM peak hour). Vehicle delay is a complex measure based on many variables, including signal phasing (i.e., progression of move- ments through the intersection), signal cycle length, and traffic volumes with respect to intersection capacity. Table 1 shows level of service criteria for signalized intersections, as described in the Highway Capacity Manual. Table A-1. Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Average Delay General Description Level of Service Per Vehicle(Seconds) (Signalized Intersections) A Less than 5.0 Free Flow B 5.1 to 15.0 Stable Flow(slight delays) C 15.1 to 25.0 Stable flow(acceptable delays) D 25.1 to 40.0 Approaching unstable flow(tolerable delay, occasionally wait through more than one signal cycle before proceeding) E 40.1 to 60.0 - Unstable flow(intolerable delay) F Greater than 60.0 Forced flow(jammed) Unsignalized intersection level of service criteria can be further reduced into two intersection types: all-way stop-controlled and two-way stop-controlled; All-way, stop- controlled intersection level of service is expressed in terms of the average vehicle delay of all of the movements, much like that of a signalized intersection. On the other hand, two- way, stop-controlled intersection level of service is defined in terms of the average vehicle delay of an individual movement(s). This is because the performance of a two-way, stop- controlled intersection is more closely reflected in terms of its individual movements, rather than its performance overall. For this reason, level of service for a two-way, stop- controlled intersection is defined in terms of its worst individual movement. With this in mind, total average vehicle delay (i.e., average delay of all movements) for a two-way, stop- controlled intersection should be viewed with discretion. Table 2 shows level of service criteria for unsignalized intersections (both all-way and two-way stop-controlled). Table A-2. Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Total Delay(sec/veh) A <_5.0 B >5.0 and<_10.0 C >10.0 and. 20.0 D >20.0 and<_30.0 E >30.0 and<_45.0 F >45.0 96700.00/JLS/96700R2 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. Page A-1 Appendix B Level of Service Results HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4a 03-22-1996 The TRANSPO Group Streets: (E-W) 4TH STREET (N-S) MONROE AVE NE Analyst: JLS File Name: MON4AMEX.HC9 Area Type: Other 3-22-96 AM PEAK Comment: 1996 EXISTING CONDITIONS Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 2 < 1 2 < > 2 < > 2 < Volumes 395 365 43 34 1022 163 24 38 38 34 10 122 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * * NB Left * Thru * * * Thru * Right * * * Right * Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 3.OA 14.OA 43.OA 5.OA Green 10.OA Yellow/AR 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Yellow/AR 3.0. Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB L - 540 1736 0.841 0.311 26.6 D 13 .8 B TR 2719 3599 0.181 0.756 2.0 A WB L 58 1736 0.674 0.033 44.7 E 16.7 C TR 1709 3577 0.837 0.478 15.9 C NB LTR 238 2145 0.776 0.111 35.1 D 35.1 D SB LTR 301 2708 0.794 0.111 34.5 D 34.5 D Intersection Delay = 18.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.865 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4a 04-03-1996 The TRANSPO Group Streets: (E-W) NE 4TH STREET. (N-S) MONROE AVE NE ', Analyst: JLS File Name: MON4AMWO.HC9 Area Type: Other 4-3-96 AM PEAK Comment: 1997 WITHOUT-PROJECT CONDITIONS Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T .R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 1 2 < 1 2 < > 2 < > 2 < Volumes 395 377 43 34 1063 163 24 38 38 34 10 122 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * * NB Left * Thru * * * Thru * Right * * * Right * Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 3.OA 14.OA 43.OA 5.OA Green 10.OA Yellow/AR 3..0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Yellow/AR 3.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS - EB L 540 1736 0.841 0.311 26.6 D -13.7 B TR 2719 3599 0.186 0.756 2.0 A WB L 58 1736 0.674 0.033 44.7 E 17.7 C TR 1712 3583 0.864 0.478 17.0 C NB LTR 238 2145 0.776 0.111 35.1 D 35.1 D SB LTR 301 2708 0.794 0.111 34.5 D 34.5 D Intersection Delay = 18.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.880 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4a 04-03-1996 The TRANSPO Group Streets: (E-W) NE 4TH STREET (N-S) MONROE AVE NE Analyst: JLS File Name: MON4AMWP.HC9 Area Type: Other 4-3-96 AM PEAK Comment: 1997 WITH-PROJECT CONDITIONS Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 < 1 2 < > 2 < > 2 < Volumes 381 372 48 81 1031 157 62 64 53 32 27 115 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * * NB Left * Thru * * * Thru * Right * * * Right * Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 6.OA 8.OA 37.OA 6.OA Green 17.OA Yellow/AR 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Yellow/AR 3.0 Cycle Length: 89 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB L 507 1736 0.864 0.292 29.-3 D 15.9 C TR 2302 3594 0.220 0.640 4.3 A WB L 117 1736 0.795 0.067 46.4 E 28.8 D TR 1490 3583 0.962 0.416 27.6 D NB LTR 381 1993 0.867 0.191 35.5 D 35.5 D SB LTR 505 2642 0.497 0.191 21.5 C 21.5 C Intersection Delay = 24.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.945 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4a 03-22-1996 The TRANSPO Group Streets: (E-W) NE 4TH STREET (N-S) MONROE AVE NE Analyst: JLS File Name: MON4PMEX.HC9 Area Type: Other 3-22-96 PM PEAK Comment: 1996 EXISTING CONDITIONS Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 < 1 2 < > 2 < > 2 < Volumes 305 1038 11 1 499 115 13 1 9 135 1 129 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3 .00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * * NB Left * Thru * * * Thru * Right * * * Right * Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 1.OA 17.OA 36.OA 5.OA Green 16.OA Yellow/AR 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Yellow/AR 3.0 ' Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB L 576 1787 0.589 0.322 17.6 C 6.7 B TR 2672 3757 0.458 0.711 3.7 A WB L 20 1770 0.051 0.011 28.5 D 14.1 B TR 1448 3619 0.578 0.400 14.0 B NB DfL 112 631 0.160 0.178 20.3 C 20.1 C TR 291 1638 0.045 0.178 19.8 C SB LTR 559 3144 0.594 0.178 23.2 C 23.2 C Intersection Delay = 11.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.608 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4a 04-03-1996 The TRANSPO Group Streets: (E-W) NE 4TH STREET (N-S) MONROE AVE NE Analyst: JLS File Name: MON4PMWO.HC9 Area Type: Other 4-3-96 PM PEAK Comment: 1997 WITHOUT-PROJECT CONDITIONS Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 < 1 2 < > 2 < > 2 < Volumes 305 1085 11 1 523 115 13 1 9 135 1 129 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * * NB Left * Thru ( * * * Thru * Right * * * Right * Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 1.OA 17.OA 36.OA 5.OA Green 16.OA Yellow/AR 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Yellow/AR 3.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB L 576 1787 0.589 0.322 17.6 C 6.7 B TR 2672 3757 0.479 0.711 3.8 A WB L 20 1770 0.051 0.011 28.5 D 14.3 B TR 1450 3625 0.599 0.400 14.3 B NB DfL 112 631 0.160 0.178 20.3 C 20.1 C TR 291 1638 0.045 0.178 19.8 C SB LTR 559 3144 0.594 0.178 23.2 C 23.2 C Intersection Delay = 11.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.617 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4a 04-03-1996 ' The TRANSPO Group Streets: (E-W) NE 4TH STREET • (N-S) MONROE AVE NE Analyst: JLS File Name: MON4PMWP.HC9 Area Type: Other 4-3-96 PM PEAK Comment: 1997 WITH-PROJECT CONDITIONS Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R •L T R L T R - • • No. -Lanes 1 - 2 < 1 2 < > 2 < > 2 < Volumes 2293 1061 23 21 509 111 21 18 39 130 11 126 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 • 0 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00' 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3..00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations ' Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * * NB Left * ' i Thru * * * Thru • * . Right * * * Right * . Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru • * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right . WB Right Green 3.OA 14.OA 34.OA 6.OA Green 18.OA - Yellow/AR. 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Yellow/AR 3.0 ' Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 Intersection Performance Summary ( Lane Group: Adj .Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow , Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB L 576 1787 0.566 0.322 17.3 C 7.5 B TR 2501 3751 0.506 0.667 5.0 A WB . L 59 1770 0.458 0.033 31.4 D 15.8 C TR 1369 3625 0.617 0.3-78 15.3 • C • NB LTR 546 2730 0.207 0.200 , 19.4 C 19.4 C SB LTR 543 , 2714 0.615 0.200 22.7 ' C 22.7 C Intersection Delay = 12.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.621 , 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 **************************************************************** File Name NDW4AMWP.HCO Streets: (N-S) NORTH SITE DRWY (E-W) NE 4TH STREET Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst JLS Date of Analysis 4/4/96 Other Information 1997 WITH-PROJECT CONDITIONS, AM PEAK HOUR Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 2< 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 790 36 5 1203 16 11 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV's (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE's 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 l Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 413 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 855 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 855 Prob. of Queue-free .State: 0.98 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 826 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 618 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 618 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.99 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2016 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 54 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 53 • Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App NB L 19 53 104.7 F 66.1 NB R 13 855 4.3 A WB L 6 618 5.9 B 0.0 Intersection Delay = 0.9 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 **************************************************************** File Name NEDWYAMP.HCO Streets: (N-S) MONROE AVE NE (E-W) NE SITE DRIVEWAY Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst JLS Date of Analysis 4/4/96 Other Information 1997 WITH-PROJECT CONDITIONS, AM PEAK HOUR Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0> 2 0 0 2< 0 0> , 1< 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 5 131 84 72 48 0 1 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (o) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (o) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV's (o) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE's 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road "6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 *******************,r*********************************,r********** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 78 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1264 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1264 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 156 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1414 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1414 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3600 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 256 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 773 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 770 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 256 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 726 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 723 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App EB L 56 723 > > > 728 5.4 B 5.4 EB R 1 1264 > > > NB L 6 1414 2.6 A 0.1 Intersection Delay = 0.8 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 **************************************************************** File Name SEDWYAMP.HCO Streets: (N-S) MONROE AVE NE (E-W) SE SITE DRIVEWAY Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst JLS Date of Analysis 4/4/96 Other Information 1997 WITH-PROJECT CONDITIONS, AM PEAK HOUR Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound • L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0> 2 0 0 2< 0 0> 1< 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 0 101 85 0 35 0 3 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV's (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE's 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap •(tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 • 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 42 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1318 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1318 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 85 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1543 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1543 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3800 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 186 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 849 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 849 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) / 186 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 805 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 805 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay - LOS By App EB L 41 805 > > > 827 4.6 A 4.6 EB R 3 1318 > > > Intersection Delay = 0.8 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS:/Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 **************************************************************** File Name NDW4PMWP.HCO Streets: (N-S) NORTH SITE DRWY (E-W) NE 4TH STREET Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst JLS Date of Analysis 4/4/96 Other Information 1997 WITH-PROJECT CONDITIONS, PM PEAK HOUR Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 2< 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 1351 54 10 646 22 26 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV's (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE's 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 **************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection. Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 702 Potential Capacity: (pcph) , 610 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 610 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.95 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB - EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1405 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 302 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 302 Prob. of Queue-free State: 0.96 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2034 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 53 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.96 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.96 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 51 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App NB L 25 51 134.1 F 66.1 NB R 30 610 6.2 B WB L 12 302 12.4 C 0.2 Intersection Delay = 1.6 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 File Name NEDWYPMP.HCO Streets: (N-S) MONROE AVE NE (E-W) NE SITE DRIVEWAY Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst JLS Date of Analysis 4/4/96 Other Information 1997 WITH-PROJECT CONDITIONS, PM PEAK HOUR Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0> 2 0 0 2< 0 0> 1< 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N ' Volumes 4 43 12 43 35 0 0 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (o) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU/RV's (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV's (o) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE's 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 r Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 **************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 28 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1340 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1340 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 55 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1602 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1602 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3800 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 80 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 979 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 977 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 80 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 941 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 939 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App EB L 41 939 > 939 > 4.0 > A NB L 4 1602 2.3 A 0.2 Intersection Delay = 1.1 • • . . • I! I I . . I ' I_ I ' 1 ! I 1 I , l'. I ) I. I . t I . 11 ( i . I_ ' I. r . 'I 1 . . . r 1 . . . . I . . _ 1 . . . . I_. . . ' 1 . ( i' . . ' ) j 1 k . . I . . 1 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 **************************************************************** File Name SEDWYPMP.HCO Streets: (N-S) MONROE AVE NE (E-W) SE SITE DRIVEWAY Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst JLS Date of Analysis 4/4/96 Other Information 1997 WITH-PROJECT CONDITIONS, PM PEAK HOUR Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0> 2 0 0 2< 0 0> 1< 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 0 23 12 0 24 0 0 PHF - .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (o) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 sU/RV's (o) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV's (o) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE's 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 **************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 6 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1375 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1375 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 12 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1689 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1689 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3800 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 3 : TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 35 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1041 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1041 Prob. of Queue-free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 35 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1006 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1006 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 **************************************************************** Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App EB L 28 1006 > 1006 > 3.7 > A Intersection Delay = 1.5 Appendix C Traffic Volume Data 2 TC Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. 14303-82nd Avenue NE,Bothell,WA.98011 Phone:(206)823-1821 FAX:(206)823-6021 Turning Movement Diagram _. ow1 686 y Ig 166 596 NE 4th Street 122 10 34 NE 4th Street A V A 163 ill 1168 1022 1219 1995 4 34 1797 395 803 365 437 V 43 ,. , v 24 38 38 a) z au c 87 100 Check In: 2288 • • i r< 36 Out: 2288 %HV PHF Intersection: Monroe Avenue NE © NE 4th Street EB 4.1% 0.87 Location: Renton WB 3.9% 0.87 Date of Count: tues 3-13-96 NB 23.0% 0.57 Peak Period: 7:15 A - 8:15 A SB 1.2% 0.73 Checked By: CJP Intersection 4.6% 0.88 Prepared For: The Transpo Group TM-96-0030 • TC C Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. 14303-82nd Avenue NE,Bothell,WA.98011 Phone: (206)823-1821 FAX: (206)823-6021 - Vehicle Volume Summary Intersection: . Monroe Avenue NE @ NE 4th Street Date of Count: tues 3-13-96 Location: Renton Checked By: CJP Time From North on(SB) From South on(NB) From East on(WB) From West on(EB) Interval Interval Monroe Avenue NE Monroe Avenue NE NE 4th Street NE 4th Street Total Ending at T L S R T L SR T LSR T L SR ::26 60,; . 7:30 A 0 7 1 23 3 6 7 8 11 7 300 33 11 80 88 6 566 8:00 A 1 10 3 26 8 9 26 9 11 7 210 51 9 109 95 27 582 815 A 0 10. .:::3 26::: 4 4 3 ��:: 13. 8:30 A 1 13 3 296 6 4 6 13 12 192 22 5 17 100 10 414 9:00 A 0 6 2 24 2 2 0 8 11 5 150 14 5 18 92 20 - 341 9:1:5:A:: : : 9:30A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 A 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Survey 6 68 18 224 34 42 43 62 86 63 1794 244 58 501 677 98 3834 Total 2 34 10 122 . 23 24 38 38 47 34 11022-163 = 33 395 365 43 2288 Approach 166 100 1219 803 2288 %HV 1% 23% 4% 4% 5% PHF 0.73 0.57 0.87 0.87 0.88 Legend: T=Number of heavy vehicles(greater than 4 wheels) L=Left-Turn S=Straight R. Right-Turn HV=Heavy Vehicles PHF= Peak hour Factor(Peak hour volume/(4*Highest 15 minutes)) Prepared For: The Transpo Group TM-96-0030 • TC Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. 14303 -82nd Avenue NE,Bothell,WA.98011 Phone:(206)823-1821 FAX:(206)823-6021 Turning Movement Diagram 686 U 265 421 I 0 NE 4th Street 129 1 135 NE 4th Street A j r A 115 641 499 615 ,- , 1995 1 1797 ao, 305 1354 1038 1182 • `/ 11 - V 13 1 9 13 23 Check In: 2257 c 36 Out: 2257 %HV PHF Intersection: Monroe Avenue NE @ NE 4th Street EB 0.7% 0.90 • Location: Renton WB 2.1% 0.77 Date of Count: tues 3-13-96 NB 0.0% 0.72 Peak Period: 5:00 P - 6:00 P SB 1.1% 0.84 Checked By: CJP Intersection 1.1% 0.85 Prepared For: The Transpo Group TM-96-30 2 TC Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. 14303-82nd Avenue NE,Bothell,WA.98011 Phone: (206)823-1821 FAX:(206)823-6021 Vehicle Volume Summary Intersection: Monroe Avenue NE @ NE 4th Street • • Date of Count: tues 3-13-96 Location: Renton Checked By: CJP Time From North on(SB) From South on(NB) , From East on(WB) From West on(EB) Interval Interval Monroe Avenue NE .Monroe Avenue NE NE.4th Street NE 4th Street Total Ending at T L S R T L SR T L S R TISR 4:30 P 1 18 0 17 0 1 0 1 1 0 90 27 , 2 27 201 2 384 R: 220°: 5:00 P 6 27 1 25 0 9 1 10 3 1 110 34 2 48 285 1 552 42i.. 5:30 P 2 24 1 31 0 3 0 1 4 0 123 19 2 71 236 3 512 5,45 .. . .0... . 33.: :::>:0:::::::;.34•,::::::>0_ �: ':1:::::'� ;:.1:': ::$;::;: ;:' :;: :_: ::.:.:; :;:,.:: ,:':::<. ..;..: . ..:. . 6:00 P 1 36 0 27 0 5 0 1 5 0 114 38 2 87 278 1 587 '''6: 5'P ::0 _' `:`d 1 ... :. . . 0. . ..0 . .....0 ... U 0 0.. 0.: � #1 6:30 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6-45•R - 7:00P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Survey 12 213 3 213 0 30 2 27 22 3 875 227 14 436 1942 16 3987 Total 3 135 1 129 0 13 1 9 13 1 . 1499 115 9 F: 305 1038 11 2257 Approach 265 23 615 1354 2257 %HV 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% PHF 0.84 0.72 0.77 0.90 0.85 Legend: T=Number of heavy vehicles(greater than 4 wheels) L=Left-Turn S=Straight R=Right-Turn HV=Heavy Vehicles PHF=Peak hour Factor(Peak hour volume/(4*Highest 15 minutes)) Prepared For: The Transpo Group TM-96-30 Site reference : 00002737 - 1 - Site identifier : 000000002737 East Driveway 51 NE 4th Street IN AXLES/2 Wed 27 Mar 1996 TIME HOUR < Interval > BEGIN TOTAL 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 06:0000 00 00 00 0 0 007:00 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 0 0 • 09:00 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 2 0 0 0 2 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 0 0 0 0 0 15.00 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 1 0 1 0 0 17:00 1 0 0 0 1 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 1 0 0 0 1 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 i 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 12, 16 18 & 24 HOUR TOTALS 07:00-119:00 4 06:00-22:00 5 06:00-24:00 5. 00:00-24:00 5 AM PEAK HOUR 10:45 PEAK VOLUME 2 P.H.F 0.25 PM PEAK HOUR 19:45 - PEAK VOLUME 1 P.H.F 0.25 Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. Printed at 01:26:18 on 01 Apr 1996 Site reference : 00002737 - 2 - Site identifier : 000000002737 East Driveway 0 NE 4th Street IN AXLES/2 Thu 28 Mar 1996 TIME HOUR < Interval > BEGIN TOTAL 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 0 0 09:00 1 0 1 0 0 10:00 1 0 0 0 1 11:00 2 0 0 2 0 12:00 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 2 0 0 1 1 14:00 2 1 1 0 .0 15:00 2 1 0 0 1 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 1 0 1 0 0 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 12, 16, 18 & 24 HOUR TOTALS 07:00-19:00 11 06:00-22:00 11 06:00-24:00 11 00:00-24:00 11 AM PEAK HOUR 10:45 PEAK VOLUME 3 P.H.F 0.38 PM PEAK HOUR 13:30 PEAK.VOLUME 4 P.H.F 1.00 Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. Printed at 01:26:19 on 01 Apr 1996 Site reference.: 00002737 - 3 - Site identifier : 000000002737 East Driveway B NE 4th Street OUT AXLES/2 Wed 27 Mar 1996 • TIME HOUR < Interval > . BEGIN TOTAL 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 • 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 t 01:00 0 0 0 0 , 0 02:00 . 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 • 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 0 0 09:00 0 0 0 0 0 . 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 • 11:00 0 ' 0 0 0 0 12:00 0 0 . 0 0 0 13:00 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 0 0 -0 0 0 15:00 0 • 0 0 0 0 • 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 • 0 0 0 0' 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 22.00' • 0 .0 0 0 - 0 23:00 -- 0 0 0 0 0 12,•16, 18 & 24 HOUR TOTALS . • 07:00-19:00 0 • 06:00-22:00 0 . 06:00-24:00 0 00:00-24:00 0 • • AM PEAK HOUR `11:45 PEAK VOLUME 0 • P.H.F 1.00 - • PM PEAK HOUR 23:45 PEAK VOLUME 0 P.H.F 1.00 • Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. Printed at 01:26:21 on 01 Apr 1996 Site reference : 00002737 - 4 - Site identifier : 000000002737 East Driveway a NE 4th Street OUT AXLES/2 Thu 28 Mar 1996 TIME . 'HOUR < Interval > BEGIN TOTAL 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 - 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0. 0 0 0 06.00 0 0 0 0 0 . 07:00 0 0 0 0 = 0 08: 1 0 1 09:00 00 00 0 10.00 1 0 0 0 1 11:00 1 . 0 0 0 1 12:00 .. 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 1 0 0 1 0 14:00 1 1 0 . 0 0 15:00 0 0 . 0 0 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 . 21:00 •0 0 0 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 12, 16, 18-& 24 HOUR TOTALS 07:00-19:00 5 06:00-22:00 5 - 06:00-24:00 . 5 00:00-24:00 5 AM PEAK HOUR 11:45 PEAK VOLUME 1 • P.H.F 0.25 PM PEAK HOUR 13:30 PEAK VOLUME 2 P.H.F 0.50 ' Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. Printed at 01:26:32 on 01 Apr 1996 1 . I Site reference : 00003579 - 1 - Site identifier : 000000003579 West Driveway B NE 4th Street IN AXLES/2 Wed 27 Mar 1996 TIME HOUR < Interval > BEGIN TOTAL 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 - --- - 0 - -- 0 0- - 0 0 06.00 0 . 0 0 0 0 07:00 1 1 0 0 0 . 08:00 1 0 0 0 1 09:00 1 0 1 0 0 10:00 1 1 0 0 0 11:00 6 0 1 1 4 12:00 6 0 2 4 0 13:00 2 0 0 0 2 14:00 3 1 0 0 2 15:00 1 1 0 0 0 16:00 1 0 0 1 0 17:00 7 3 0 3 1 18:00 2 2 0 0 0 19:00 1 0 0 0 1 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 21:00 2 2 0 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 12, 16 18 & 24 HOUR TOTALS 07:00-119:00 32 06:00-22:00 35 06:00-24:00 35 00:00-24:00 35 AM PEAK HOUR 11:45 PEAK VOLUME 10 P.H.F 0.63 PM PEAK HOUR 17:00 PEAK VOLUME.- 7 P.H.F 0.58 Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. - Printed at 01:21:44 on 01 Apr 1996 Site reference : 00003579 - 2 - Site identifier : 000000003579 West Driveway B NE 4th Street IN AXLES/2 Thu 28 Mar 1996 TIME HOUR < Interval > BEGIN TOTAL 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 00:00 -- -0 0___ -0 -- - 0- --- 0 ---- - -- - -- -- ---- ---- - 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 06.00 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 2 0 0 0 2 08:00 1 0 0 1 0 09:00 4 2 0 1 1 10:00 8 4 0 1 3 11:00 14 2 2 4 6 12:00 16 3 2 3 8 13:00 6 0 1 4 1 14:00 6 3 0 0 3 15:00 17 7 3 0 7 16:00 7 4 1 0 2 17:00 1 0 0 1 0 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 12, 16, 18 & 24 HOUR TOTALS - 07:00-19:00 82 06:00-22:00 82 06:00-24:00 82 00:00-24:00 82 AM PEAK HOUR 11:30 PEAK VOLUME 15 J P.H.F 0.63 PM PEAK HOUR 15:00 PEAK VOLUME 17 P.H.F 0.61 1 Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. - Printed at 01:21:45 on 01 Apr 1996 Site reference : 00003579 - 3 - Site identifier : 000000003579 West Driveway B NE 4th Street OUT AXLES/2 Wed 27 Mar 1996 TIME HOUR < Interval > BEGIN TOTAL 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 - - — - — - - -- - 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 - 06:00 2 0 1 1 0 07:00 2 1 0 0 1 08:00 1 0 0 0 1 09:00 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 4 3 0 0 1 11:00 7 0 1 1 5 12:00 8 1 2 5 0 13:00 2 0 0 0 2 -- 14:00 7 2 1 0 4 15:00 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 2 0 0 2 0 17:00 16 4 0 10 2 18:00 2 2 . 0 0 0 19:00 1 0 0 0 1 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 21:00 5 5 0 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 12, 16, 18 & 24 HOUR TOTALS 07:00-19:00 51 06:00-22:00 59 06:00-24:00 59 00:00-24:00 59 AM PEAK HOUR 11:45 PEAK VOLUME 13 P.H.F 0.65 PM PEAK HOUR 17:00 PEAK VOLUME 16 P.H.F 0.40 Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. Printed at 01:21:46 on 01 Apr 1996 Site reference: 00003579 - 4 - Site identifier : 000000003579 West Driveway a NE 4th Street OUT AXLES/2 Thu 28 Mar 1996 TIME HOUR < Interval > BEGIN TOTAL 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 • 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 , 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 1 0 1 0 0 07:00 5 3 0 0 2 08:00 4 0 0 1 3 09:00 3 0 0 1 2 10:00 9 4 1 1 3 11:00 16 3 2 6 5 12:00 19 4 4 2 9 13:00 8 0 2 5 1 14:00 7 3 0 1 3 15:00 19 7 4 0 8 16:00 7 5 1 1 0 17:00 4 0 2 2 0 18:00 1 0 1 0 0 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 21:00 1 0 1 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 12, 16, 18 & 24 HOUR TOTALS 07:00-19:00 102 06:00-22:00 104 06:00-24:00 104 00:00-24:00 104 AM PEAK HOUR 11:30 PEAK VOLUME 19 P.H.F 0.79 PM PEAK HOUR 15:00 PEAK VOLUME 19 P.H.F 0.59 Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. Printed at 01:21:58 on 01 Apr 1996 Site reference : 00002734 - 1 - Site identifier : 000000002734 Driveway a Monroe Avenue NE IN AXLES/2 Wed 27 Mar 1996 TIME HOUR < Interval > BEGIN TOTAL 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 1 1 0 0 0 08:00 6 0 0 0 6 09:00 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 1 0 0 1 0 11:00 4 4 0 0 0 12:00 4 2 2 0 0 13:00 3 3 0 0 0 14:00 2 2 0 0 0 15:00 7 2 0 0 5 16:00 6 0 2 2 2 17:00 32 8 0 16 8 18:00 2 2 0 0 0 19:00 3 0 0 3 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 21:00 16 16 0 0 0 22:00 2 0 0 0 2 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 12, 16, 18 & 24 HOUR TOTALS 07:00-19:00 68 06:00-22:00 87 06:00-24:00 89 00:00-24:00 89 AM PEAK HOUR 08:45 PEAK VOLUME 6 P.H.F 0.25 PM PEAK HOUR 17:00 PEAK VOLUME 32 P.H.F 0.50 Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. Printed at 01:04:21 on 01 Apr 1996 Site reference : 00002734 - 2 - Site identifier : 000000002734 Driveway B Monroe Avenue NE IN AXLES/2 Thu 28 Mar 1996 TIME HOUR < Interval > BEGIN TOTAL 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 0:00:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 02:00 _ 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 • 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 4 0 0 0 4 07:00 1 1 0 0 0 08:00 8 6 0 0 2 09:00 8 5 3 0 0 10:00 8 8 0 - 0 0 11:00 14 11 0 3 0 12:00 14 3 0 6 5 13:00 3 1 0 0 2 14:00 1 1 0 0 0 15:00 23 8 7 0 8 16:00 14 7 2 5 0 17:00 10 6 1 2 1 18:00 1 1 0 0 0 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 Q 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 12, 16, 18 & 24 HOUR TOTALS 07:00-19:00 105 06:00-22:00 109 06:00-24:00 109 00:00-24:00 110 AM PEAK HOUR 11:00 PEAK VOLUME 14 P.H.F 0.32 PM PEAK HOUR 15:00 PEAK VOLUME 23 P.H.F 0.72 Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. Printed at 01:04:22 on 01 Apr 1996 • Site reference : 00002734 - 3 - Site identifier : 000000002734 Driveway B Monroe Avenue NE OUT AXLES/2 Wed 27 Mar 1996 TIME HOUR < Interval > BEGIN TOTAL 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 1 1 0 0 0 08:00 2 0 0 0 2 09:00 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 4 4 0 0 0 12:00 4 3 1 0 0 13:00 2 2 0 0 0 14:00 2 2 0 0 0 15:00 4 0 0 0 4 16:00 6 0 2 2 2 17:00 19 6 0 11 2 18:00 1 1 0 0 0 19:00 1 0 0 1 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 • 21:00 14 14 0 0 0 22:00 1 0 0 0 1 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 12, 16, 18 & 24 HOUR TOTALS 07:00-19:00 45 06:00-22:00 60 06:00-24:00 61 00:00-24:00 61 AM PEAK HOUR 11:45 PEAK VOLUME 4 P.H.F 0.33 • • PM PEAK HOUR 17:00 PEAK VOLUME 19 P.H.F 0.43 Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. Printed at 01:04:23 on 01 Apr 1996 0 Site reference : 00002734 - 4 - Site identifier :- 000000002734 Driveway B Monroe Avenue NE OUT AXLES/2 Thu 28 Mar 1996 TIME HOUR < Interval > BEGIN TOTAL 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 00:00---- — --- 0 ------0- - 0------ 0- - -- 0 — -- — — 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 3 0 0 0 3 07:00 2 1 0 0 1 08:00 4 3 0 0 1 09:00 8 4 4 0 0 10:00 6 6 0 0 0 11:00 10 9 0 1 0 12:00 10 2 0 3 5 13:00 1 1 0 0 0 14:00 2 2 0 0 0 15:00 18 5 6 0 • 7 16:00 8 5 0 3 0 17:00 12 6 1 3 2 18:00 1 1 0 0 0 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 12, 16, 18 & 24 HOUR TOTALS 07:00-19:00 82 06:00-22:00 85 06:00-24:00 85 00:00-24:00 85 AM PEAK HOUR 11:00 PEAK VOLUME 10 P.H.F 0.28 PM PEAK HOUR 15:15 PEAK VOLUME 18 P.H.F 0.64 • Traffic Count Consultants, Inc. Printed at 01:05:03 on 01 Apr 1996