Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA96-038 • • ` _�-4r-M cA _FLODRE50E+OT. 4: 15 hl PL, L�{ (2)EA:CARPORT • COPE SEARCH 71�1_ ``dew, � — A1NINO DATA '5+4 • B ZONINGJURISDONO79 CITY OP RENON _ LFll if 1., t ,G T- ,1 I `- + - - /,/ ZONING DESIGNATION: MAY IAc5,OR0WNiCE145133..MULTI MIILY ._ _irr SHALL 82SUEJECTTOhIEDE\ElOPMENT ARC f IITI I_ I 1 _ -- _ ( 9rANDARP5 OF THE MULTI-FAMILY ZONE U��,�yy..��•�'� PAL -- _ I j ! / FOMMUNRYCENTER(MF�,SECIION431.B.D G•!dh,.:rai',Y`ii":151.. / c.0 FIEELSTO 6 I , ,r • Of oIMiER31.TIRE N.0F THE CIttCWE I El+V :S4RC>•/N f�SAIJtO 9� I� 1 1 2 PROPOSED USE: StIE PLAN MULTI-FAMILY l !:' - 1 DENSITY AL PROCESS, 4 UWTSREVIEW.PER ALRE�N431'u5. I —.-I- _ 1 n /'r v - JN DENsarrwoP05ED, ,20 UNITS/ACRE .9 q `.°I_ q ! I. , THREE si0RE5 K L.caN7acS _... ...___ --__J__--«'y°.I1 .N B0.'1i9,-)O011L HEIGHT 350/MAXMNL iH FRONTYARD SETBACK: 2001 MIN. E102 iM12NDAVEbE ' 5E>E YARDSETMCK: 24MIN l I `I, SIDE YARD SETBACK(TOTAL): 26-PMIN. • BELLEVUE.WA9BDOG l REAR YARD SETBACK: IS'OMRL TEL J4]-04w 'YP.GARpoRT PlAI.I: Y4.� ,. ACCE550RYBUM1DING558.: 06'9'MW FAX 989-975 kg'.1'.Ou .p /�^tl v .�IT. / - (E)$UILVINv- �. µLOAEp PP-0JELlI0N51NfO BA:MVM/S PER FACApE 1999T1ANIOVADE MAY PAGE 989.93J5 n1 /:\•, ,' l PPAJECr NOMORERIAN2L', piy'�1! p0 CI=J PARk4K".. EIVE PR0.JECf10N5: MApMUM 2i'WfO RFLUIfSD WiERIOROR 1.1I' T I • M1 ,ry/.' W . _ .-_____ - 1 Srv.EETSE1BncK. 1•"' SREAREA 629654AI O. (267 rcm) Ij 12 (` I _ - LDt COVERAGE AILOWEP. 4BZ WrtDWGICNERAGE �'RAR REGISTERED CI 1.41 �. 2 i ' ' °,.'# I� fSLOG. T L A I -y "\ PROPOSED LOP f,D:ERAGE: 4'ft=4 CARPL 5 541Lwufiillcion GS 1 1 i'J � I,�� API V 1 •F' yam.• 1 •'�. 19.R TOTAL&IILDING COERAGE • • O /•1-l! . 11 I I \ IMPERNOUS SURFACE COVERAGE,'15Z BLDG.FOOTPRINT,90EWALAS.ORMENAYS , • LI"EG: ' ._'121 MIN.SETEAkC, IMPERNOus!U59ACE RROPOSED:wsuw eq Tc.a52. -f`(P_ELEVATION ! % /r/ ' UI. I - . Ygla l'-0 u. {�$9'Id�1��W''.PJp`,Lol I I�-_o 1 ,11 - yl I �pL rN PARKING RELNIRED: I.JS/DV=1BB(DILL 0.2/UNRGUE9T MUG). � 1 "c ...'.:' , -•I'j --_- �'----,-=F-.. _ _-__ _- NG PRW1DER L25f D11=IB K „ 'S'^ Iy 1 _ __ PARKING BRFI,FDOM4: h189M1 131.15e 6m h `'J I LgII 4�- ,,,4._, __—__ V __F� GARAGE PARKING. 24 6 .a- 1 J, }�•: .' {r v t I 1 i : I I _ T e-L L ....... ARKNG wI CARPDRr= Bs • 3?3'__..—�._._ h j. IT-1 A \ '1' bTAas�bTAND¢D sx o .In . k"T r i Il ."• /i',.'/ l rF/t/ _ '_"_—- I I i f At_� I O r `-I.1 i- _ t ' > 1 BTP1151ZE fAMPALT: 81/Z,VI6'(MA%]W41 W . J 1 e �y L ...- _-...._. �j�'_�.�::': C � '9t•DG', r 11 t 1\ t,wDs`AnNG iI t<°`Nvsc\nNG ,s141.y ft. M ,g, - %,, : I ',• 1 1- •I ` .,E 8 /NI HYDROSEEDED SLOPES B6500 .K '_�.' Jtle /'. II/ I B- E. l.v LI_•_rl \�p_ u i. ) aba n C.Xf6TI(STREE'. (t- �1 _BL 1 l-'� "o!Y ,: f I-I EL1 FLOOR JAT.I` +ITN I ..� _-1"JR Il _i__ a{. \ 1 \ LEGEND • G u-S. ' T .f. I �Ar-•�II j __-_ 1 r1 6F�� L'� l COWING GRADES SVERAOE CE)U2PG6zAEU' V�O� 1�'% / / I \ I ...', , �r`Y �,��._�-L(�-j�,.�' �• �•L J 21D11`'- -`.. pm:H GRADES ___ E Hwy W I� III / - I< f:.L-C':T-�I-., jl {_� II EL 16TF BI.Oa' r• \6-.-, ''(!�' I,EU.4 1 '��`'• ` EK5111.4 0ETARON LINE _-- DL.�j,V O /•' I��, 1\ , 2,4.601' - 1\-Z, 1•�,-1,- 1 l; _ u =5 m \`I..\; �✓ . / I' '` �-�;�ri;t, ; I-'---1• �rl �')�:,\`' '� 1`1\' 1" \ M:-A 1 zrrozT / Z i g a \ \' b ' 1 1 , %1� t -1_ ' SPOT GRADE L- °' 1 ' yy�\-,I - YY. ` (-fi 1 i `� PARKING LOT C W '.'.\,'.:\.I jgT C h, ==j_- "Y. a.zv�+cr 1za-W/' �._I.l�� -f%, TP.'.-1 I`] I "."�:,;,I\, - �p`',c i-".• �'1.9u INDiCA,ES CARPORT 1---yii/�•I IPPr1 1 n.E,c 110.V01 - If`\...Oc• \ _ .1'%'T .�' '�- r`Ycsj —��_ ��.I t,Ly I c.S> '�,, l. 1 �.�,. >;.•\_ J� .{?;, I ' w 4- , f:E1.5Aep':.'.. _�! -11 1 '\ WMP3/FR w oC l�Ln \\\,''•��11\'�i ',� '\ i 1ti I F r ` '\ -.._.1 --_II / ,`'..�_'.- ' rj • 7a • ! \ ti O z ,' 1\ \,,,, DG ▪ _ • I''._.___--.�•--- r _ CONCR9tE RETNNiNG WALL a' \ 'I •I i\I it IA .% I :I', li I: .,5T F'p e } 1 T ;'1v--- m..: • i '.._.'' �,�. Y , R0.'KERY/ENGINEERED t G. O i ILL III /, 'I ll`~ �c�▪ T. c ___ - _ f'rJ6GT" ` RETAINING WAIL vKL`�- 1 Ii' w I 1 ' + �--1"\ __ 1 `\ ,} \ BUILDING DATA • I/1 I e iI \ '1 - - L�, - I -BL 2.4� -� I..„_1. I, II v 1 1� ! ', \ .\ \ i{ \<22„ 6,f:LR`14 ND.STORIES IBRJI BATH TBR/T?ALH TtlRl2.BAD1 FL/B✓.11WIG I\ 1 'I' `-. + _M.-. L \. \ 11 _ 1 L Ztt3RL-BLBN^T. �� '�� ,rL}13_ I�:•o `l''( >I3!.P Db0 IOOJ AFFA. {II','. .40-.'. .�St✓D'. \ '6 T (' I 1 i L_.., V -^'P� ` 1 ,_,� ((}'T B _- 4 _-_' A:E.c.l'1].75r i Y y. 11 \� '\\ A iST FL BASEMENT, 2 402 \ 1,1 lY } ',.1' PF•U'. _ ' ,[, --- Q JP.-3A��. R�-. 4 ` 1 I, 1 \,, 2NOL 4 4028 4g. I 1.1 _ LL_.—'- ..I.{--:1 - 51,',I W -1 O N 2NO FL. 4dffi I __ \ �'., I I\6 ., <. , B'$ . 1` \ OD\•V F "'71 .'1`].r. �-�i , j•�I �•=-�- G B BASEMENT fL z z to I TOTAL J 1 la YI L 1\ .� 5 \ r 1B DG T5 f-�� (_ "-I- •i•t -1 I/ I `� .•_. '•\ 1ST FL 4 4 6400 - iir V. '1E tSTFLO;R't .51 4 71 _ b .- WL- 'I •r 4'\il Q` 4 , l\ \ 2ND FL 4 4 0408 ,{ ` :\-?":-4 1-p -- ,-S:WvN RI6LGGlK.2GT:./;.,. TOTAL 4 l0 16520 \ 14, ``\ \1,' p 1ST FL z65z I � \ ` \ `_\ _L, ... 1 \ _ 'r'` -C �_r� ({ J..l._.A-:L J ��•��I • � 1 •\ 1 1 2ND FL 4 2862 • • 1 1 L I .• ��__I. SRDFL �`: 1 a 1. \'`l 1 ,,�-_ 1 A`E(K.S+_ `',\ TOTAL Tz n4oB ` .\ 1� -,f� _ \� 42' 1 D BASEMEN PARK'GSTOR 2310.374 V _7E.Lnll �y -iJY `'\� 2ND FL 4 4028 t_. ':. '' L7, \I • "'•yb ..- \1�-1 \ rmni >z ns ' ' ' u5,1-1 • ! 3 E 1ST FL 4 2552 j.Tl+fNill�k'f I \'' '%I qy�� • ®b. 1 \ 1ST FL PARK'GSTOR 2I16/900 `^ \ r/ LO_ 51 : '\ 2ND FL B 5104 - 704 •-"_� )OJ' ` 3RDFL 8 ST1Tl0 FiR1:S.L L. TOTAL 20 .`\ 5556 • ` '\' (�/ 11 )/� yY • F 5T FL. 4 35E6 drawn.6 LL. '1'\ \ `.I .I '11`\' / 11.'/ ' ,-- _ _ - -uD nl_ "�_ 4,J5 �'+' ,• \ 3R0D FL. a 3556date:roA9/ao .W I i '' �l _ Irs_ 5�'S le,ck -. - y SO l-�. 'j.1 _ TOTAL 1z - wesa n'\icion '-- - -' • i yq f)i; '_,U—/ _ ..-_ '._ s es. \ \'.'1 G sr FL 4 _ 2052 !, ./. A4 / -/ Ita ti_� f'�"' t,�'cD- _ > ' •.'1,• Ili ST FL. PA¢K'G5f0R 2116/900 L] i ':� :M �., ,_ `5'� �' 3' 2ND FL B 5]61 • Q 1 __ __ 1�,l TOTAL 9 , 5J04A __. ._- . (\'t7/ . 58'1,Oe' - _ TOTAL.IO9 du 62 22 92 _.._--_ • -_. 1 /-.-.__. __ / >. ..'� `.. ! ``95 �.\ TOTAL AIff BB62 A ( Du - �. -.CE]'",G.PJ .!IF:.'.'. f• ��, _ _ `'1 \ _ t .: TOrALAREA . e' �4.-,Ur.-to3. -_'. .�' 1':1t l\';t '• / STORAGE '"" *-. •- 912.So, 51TE,PLAN&PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 1O 6° \ 1': If<4o''0° TOTAL AREA 6a46 • ._.___._--= n., L_:_ \ 1. PRFGADG. L� Al TOTAL AREA I9 5 932 PROJECT 1 - .`C`!4::YJE_Ey'.",l , IjIJ WIM •,.' aw ;1, 1Iulil!111111111LI1ighIILi111 ,v_r�i sa�ac�.�-�cc� I ) I I I - I Sri ��y n ,.,, '';�• ,^ l I , ft/prer-lliz j I ,� krii.„ :, I E1, 4�'I . // /• -- ( _ lc '..'a"S� A I� T IIIII9I IL'u�. fu - I Q�w ��O 4 ,�i (G� 1 E �I( \ 1�4 I�1�i�£��Illlill / / T Tj. � As UNEJfir,'. f n'1 1 J 9'1.:‘,'," / / 1 - • 4 '�I I A I _ '' 4 Q1('.. �011 J O�I \V„ ;f ri .11 /A, / . ' ,. /0 ' '"lr,,v,'.D.c es: -,,,,,,,,,,r,› tali:0.w\ ,. J .. 4,Z si / " ' ii „64,ttik. " 911''''Atw''bi' 'W''Mllgtirifal;i*--Ciati:•?;6416',:-7:44.. _ on 1.1111VVI % Air 9 I a i 'p, ...,. ..-. //, / ,/ 1:31 __ 1,-- iisto,w.Loof ik,i):: ,s'`•-,,,a 001 __IP.r'''..0 / irAt:0. ,I (5' Ireig /• jr::$'''.:!''‘!'1.6.1r-alli_i _ ; a / ; ~ : ' ` — _ / ,`r 01 :G'1•S•�r, .: '' jci !� es. ' ,;. fir; a 'i .. tiltiai cc / • / // , ,t'it'ilipo'°_,dirm,"-_, .7.•-• 1114.101111CATiee) -- 0 _ ,,.„ itili,t-.,' Q. ir ti / yi,,. y %of s- 5 )` I j�t.,, ` � !�� d a _....ii 'i:6- ID , , - i 4.47( iffi, --0.--01---mmi - ..b, •. tir7.44,11? • WSk 7 I / / ,E0-// , xigret-i6-ao..- ... __-- . -I-- ,tateal ..:7-,,,,r7, .4,1 '4 1 43_,\ icir . 0 I / / . / 1` I� �.�'� .—®� �rr /J 4LdW' ' �a�� \ - It S EVANS / MilanS EVANS �� i,/ ' ,ems:Ns mimiiimmi LL ----.-------.— --------------- --------_---,--. , -, -' • -.....-I.-4.L.s.--st...%, ...W.,-5=9;4•1•.,,,---,-i,,,c --..:..,,,,,,-.•...„.-,..,.-.r ...,-,.= .......- .. ... .. . . , . . .,... . ,. • • 1 Tr•-,?,,,,,t,1-,,:.,,,-;s:-..,,,t?;=. s,s . -...1-=:•.•. . . . SE 1/4,NW 1/4,SEC.7, TWP.23 N, RGE.5 E,W.M. Ci. ,., ,...• , .... ,. ... , . '•'.-t.l't:,'•:',•,.•-•• -.: -•' -; '......--..,,. --,:::'. , . . Z ',1'-iz•-•-'X:.: :••••• ..: -. 0: . .. ! • 8 co I:4 71. •.7k;'.•••:.. , )/// (---- ..--"'---/ • ,..,..„..7.y ......, . I 1.-,. 1 E-• -‘7' /I I .r' i.••,.•,../1„...••,,, / 1• 'i' ' '•••I --.ki'C' •'..g '• • z ,',-8- • /I/t/ ./ /..,---' ' .r.,//,'; -- / • • I 1 e.• I ( z,, ' / t ,•-- 7' --, 1 0, .: - .. fir I \ 1 ... -;. . . • _ _,) .,1_1.j)2 / / • 1,..t.,,,,,,,,:, 71. .. ...,, I.:- ..-.. • I!)1- , 1 - .1 ' / -./.....--..... I I .„.'"---/ ', , . • _' / '/. -/_,/2 j .... ..., ,, • . 7' II/ / '''',,V,/ /y//-1--_- / . . • ,--z.,,.:11-ei, • .7\:<, . , k i 6'in ,to ///,'/,- ,p.7 ' ///,_/- - EX51-1,-IG OFFICE. I•4.1' •-'?'14;1*" ',.•.,... J --, ''•..: I-.Z'i 3 ,%.,-;-.,.`.-f.•,... .•; 7 1(7//'///'7.‘"V/:- 1 CONSF'L.E.X , ,I . • e•Z,I 3F t•••if, • II: r.'"Cr‘.1"." '' ' ' ''''• C•::::::!:::..11fflt '--- --- -');.4. - .- r.''' 4 - ,/ ! ,• . ,,, .:11 , . , / / //,//// _ Jill 5.;',4.71....., ''/FM.',i--'- t••?.- • , t • VICINITY MAP / /../ / -- I ,./ ...!_--__ •--.,"--1--7" ..., , \ .1=',-.-.------ . ' VSIDD 1 • • ' .fq • .'.,:i';. _.1_,,.L,L/ fr_,_,////.///•V/4 /.411 -7.-------. . ' PM \ I\ ,..,,...„..., ,,4 . , • t_--,---.----- ---- ES7. /r..//////,'.;;;//,' r jpippirP.--, .-- _,- ----------.. -_-•---1..._____-_ -4- \ \ • C/) • • •,,, ...-,..,•.....,.._,,-,... WALLED INTERIOR,SUM AS AOS-N12 OR EQUAL. a''•-r.4.' it ..,,. •., , ,.... . 0 ;',.'•,,''', ' ' 7;. ///V 1 ' ' lila' .II \ '','---- .- -r--• • _ ‘'''-ii.: - ''''CC,..---trr /1,/ / •i) \ SLOWES, .1..,T.IECDTGEA.VPID 5. ALL CATOP BASINS SHALL BE TYPE 1,UNLESS SPECIFIED ...: V // ' '. i%*It/ liri ---' v•-\, T,.._____,----- - • , \ .•\ et ,.,1 '4.' II, .7.0. i 9. ALL BUILDING,DOWNSPOUTS AND FOOTING MAINS SUALL BE .W g ,„ . ( •It'' , 27 / ---... I 1. ..j.,..J..--, . ttiz, , ._:_,,..,_,, ,_..,,,,_.,- -, j\,,,.._..,- ,--t\-:,, __,,, , At ., PIPED INTO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. MIN.6.PIPE AT 21 g; = .,.... 01:-/WATER SEPPRNTDP, SLOPE...-7,,.... ' ' \ \-.. \ -\I 1.1. • ••• •• .-\ao,,,,,t. 5. ALL PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE SURFACED'WITH hSPHALT WITH PERIMETER EXTREME°CURBING. ALL PAVED C W .E4 ., AND INTO THE NEAREST MT.BASIN. • ''4> f . \\\ I \ 1''''' \ : ,:',"-\. . •, ., , ,_ .'-- ilipitik; , \ \ t-t\----,„7,-1 6. THE SWIPNING POOL BACEWASH AND DIEM SHALL BE CONNE=0 Z r14 p.,., '.., ..."....•, k- . .• \ \\''\N. • .. )'\1./r/ -", 1 - I '''.1.:\''',...,•.ki • \ . , TO THE SANITARY SEWER SP.., : ."., \\ \'N ' ( ( i i - •-- i• ,bi,- 11 I'''''-. [si.•-e"-5`\;\,- `t,---•\\,, - '- - -;10014.0ilit.°• 0 F?,.1 C3 E--, , \ .\\\\t'\, •-'.4.4,, \ \\\\\..\\\. '‘ ',, ', , ..,,, BL„ , '\ - , ..,...,•, - ,...,.--...• r-L.._,- K.•,-.,-.L.---- ----. ;--1-- - .i, —; ----,--- -A.h, ' - --,,,•.....— , , z 4 4 • 0-‹ ' --,,...-•s' : \ \ '-- . e4,,„ . . • \ ) ;flilrfir"/ \ \ , kV G. \ •-. .-.. ..::, • . \ / ( \ \ ,::\s \,_\ 7- — „t [r] —1-71.1]. '1 k F,Agr 'T, ' \ .,, . . . . P14) 1 \ 1 i '.. .,,,\N \ .,--11 "‘..- - , 1 --.j'-' I...• '.1--.. '\: • ' I' \ `• . ' I t It k I Ii.,11P ‘:\: '\:\___.\7.\\----7-\‘', '.; • 1 ..-----' - -;.ii--si- c - 7-1-.--r 1 -1 . '" 1:\\\ , ',t . . REVISIONS • . , 1,%. •., \.. ., --. , ,•,•--) ti \, 41, .._,...• 1,-.. , •,t , r •-: ,-.••-• \ ,, ,\\., ,,s..,, : i ,, ...Ili V -,, .6Fri-1 inni ilip:\ ,— ..- ,,,-. - ,T, - ,1-...- , \ \ \,,,,\,",..e.-,,,\",,,,:&,, 3 , -,,,', , ,/,,,, - ,, . -...,-._,-4-__-_,- ,',4,,-.....-:' -.a ,.,.,\,\ '',A ', \ T;') \ \ \ • \INA r6.,...- ____, ---7---:__ ____ __.. . r.,, •.. . - • \I\\ , ,\ ' ' -- , —t—cA" ' I I lk 1 - NC' 1 , i. ,t, •:,\,...A. \ , \A - • •• . • \\ ,. •-,.:\;\ , -•-_,--c--,A\ \, ___., _„.,..,:••_„_, ; .-- --,..i... .. ..... _ ,- '2,--,,,,- 3•92. , - ..., - \I\ ,\ \•,• \\,..;sc \A,..,,\• „7--..1 • RE.P.I.m.......,..t--....S•R ADP - \,....„.,. s' .7 ....2,..0\ , V\. 111611 • • • , ' ... . , V,.\ \• \\'1', \ 1,.\:- - '" ''. ..'!-, \ \ )1 I, „ c -..• '-' \ . • . •, • ---_, •-. -,, \ N''.-,..,... , - ., \ . .- . N-,,„..'.- • -.\s•- •• te .-=----- 1 \ .. . - - '‘'.' \.;' n,--, ----,____. _____.... .--,.. ••••-,.. •N.., ''k.s.?‘-'.2\ 1 \ ; P..' • .',, '',....z-.-.:."'NN-- \\ \ ‘ t 1 /7--- ------- ---'5--- NORTH drown, ..... )''' \ \\A 1 --. ----•-•- •N N., \'‘,. ', ,•,\ •i\\, ' \ •-•\ r—t-.•------1 date: „. scAr..F...: ,°•Ad revision- • • --___ --- ---,-_-,- -- _./4' / / i l.: ' / 7;-:,-----__,-------------1:;'.‹......2_,•-•__,: --„,_ 'N, (-N.7----Q,,, \ '\ \ '\\'..,' ' , .. _______ ,....._;ss; /, / 7-.,;;;',_,,,,, 7....„-_____-T--2-:---0...,.-::::-s_.; -,,,-------.',-.2-_,,N,,,-, \ ---- N.. ,:.st,:,t 5•,,_:\\[ . 'CONCPTIJA1.1.,yTIL17Y P1.:45..N.,. Q ., :: •...i \_______ ,-----_____--- ..„,}P, ,,5 (-<-% ,-2!'') .. -. - ' • JAEGER ENGINEERING •-r, •-... - ••-•, '\ ‘‘ \\\\ v..,• z, . •-“''.--, - . ... . \N,\ -..,,,.--- '',if...;:'..R...• - •' . --\..„._ -_____---_,-___-_,:_--___-- / / 1,.:•1 „ , - ,1, •9419 S.204th PL. -.. \\\\\I\Vs. '.:',t;.--7--ii-•-,,‘,•.: ,-... , •••„____--------__-_=_-:__—_--- , ..- ..;;, KENT,WA. 98031 :i.i.J7-ft•-- '''-'-'':':.. ' . . • l'-'"'"5' I •(206)850-0934 R'...--1',,VS2.-:?..-'4.=1....-,•.-',•,-..., , .. ••• . i (t,..-v''...ep-.Psi:-,-Tralir.f.:3..-:-:-.r.i•--4 ..t,I•:-.V.------.....•-•:-.•.,. . • •-• • •• . . • (:1;y2,--:',.=t1L'ialir.i.--Ltit-k-.I.i,-....-,..>:,•,,,:,..,-_,,;j:....;,•,,,, . . . .. • • . - ..,....., .„ . ..................... ... ________ _..._._._......._....._...........„......„„..„„...................., .„ ., ,. . ,. ,, , „ , . ,, , , - - , . " ,J -• 36I37 36135 34 33 32 1,e 1+' 3029I Zs127126129 I2•�,. ` r°� • �� L.:±11 , ,�,°10 ..o 7•+ • _ :\ - •n t°_ _ - - t, O. lilt ke•t! � . +r. ` , f, °� o "♦ ra' f' 0��t e3 II •2 °a S. I15TH PL _ 7 z ' 64 ,� 4 ,. • ) „• 16 2 -. " s• IB ' p ..♦pi•3 S a ; is 3 ia.•, I �Ng 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1'�0,.✓17 21,`m„y0 -. ' 20'0 D+ : i 0•> ,t �a ! — -- A--,0 4 0 0 �' p 4 •Y•�• is 3� '' otlf''17 2 ©•'✓'S P .... 4 y , ,.+,ne L.. .a— '1 9 / J �' J g f •••19 '\�y" 16 ' .,:a.•.. . . _ \ _ \\e\ oN00�P( \�) —1°t5„ - =T"io 1� a S I16TH �1°ST s, N 'I�• y w 6 r_.,'-, o °•-, ♦ a . , �s.' '2l f 6 r ��•+�5IS 7 ,2 0 �'gP� p' ••°` °Ilr 7 00 �5 e 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 26 27 26 25`2• f'r 14.233 I yw�. O 4 ��• el{.OS w+• ° + ,, 9 1 N III S.72 ^ - .. .. • =i J, r 21y4✓�'S •09°13 3 $ nj°s°11 h :l v.L •c .s s,. f I'. I •/.•.i ,�6 7 : 3 s�o I2 • ¢:r^ w,!.• r,d: U •,fo ice., ''• •t0 +• I t r L v w ,4.:4, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 t ° �••M.' , -_—_—__ f ♦ f' 1••,• 'I .°a O 7 6 5 4 - •2 :fo esu. 2 . ♦ Z L-,'---, c_, `�, --' '.-' <-7 o fA' 'i 7 . _ I,, I Iy:•0 1 , `� I �- o fe j j� Ie •f ;.. (�� •y, - , . S >.9' 3, 3 " w re � �'� ,y h art' !♦•'1 ' •' a 11' = 0S. II6TH PL.Y .<, •o' , 8t ° .�� •4 "♦ _ I 21 p U19 ' S �•°: 1 sr. • S. 1 1q 5 +: �8Jr20 ' � S i ° O z —.--.4e2 ;IJ-'-':;0;:.9 • 6 0 0I z�°0 7 •6 16 y.•v' I° ^�� ✓q• f,! 4 O. ..ctl• • O._t ,vt7ef:e i IS 38 37 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27/ 25 24 Jrs•° 2J.'S • 7 ,•0•e e9 r °,�se a 4« .. •. "�+ 40.2 6_� s° S. 117TH ST. y VAC 54 3 1, I------------7 I5 < I 2 3 a 5 6 7 �r 9 10 11 12 1J i14 15, ae 161 'ao ,• 24 23 22 21 20 19 1E 17 :t�•7 1ie1; ° 5)+'13 •' .e51 �--,'--7 '--•'-•71•-70 0`' ._...,,_4 s+°O Gfr'17 Y MEM `-7 .'H 1•-7. I' 0 • 2 �`' __ 2 'qg s 0 2 ,,r✓ • ° J •P°18• IIMISE ®t,'S ,�' 0 ,4, it 3 '''w. ,,,oa • 3 - "7 ,'' $ ,h� 9 t' •'1 ''J i, +* , tu" / ,LrJ t fr a�` •° •(26 z,es a 0 24 =5 5 If.7Y ♦ h p� •�1" �.. 0 0 :2-'4 BMr= 4ll Y '''0 ! �-z i I" 01,� 5= _. • y 6 a ✓ 3 1 .' 3 ,/ 30 ' 2 O t�f '�� 5.°°� el, , ,'3 �, is 'a l 7; 7, 7 ° IS 3e 37 36 lS 3433 32 31 92e 2726 25 24, 9 s. II 12 IJ 14 is 16 S` 1^ $ Qb$ sC.S HAWTHORNE ST. 32 '2- ✓,/07. YAK [ /Sr al/ s• ,e .. r• ,. ,so 16 I '^ so .. y �r w 1., ve y 'o$'. 1 3 14 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 e 9 10 II 1213 I, 15 . j O j' r 24 20 19 18 17 7 - s e G c...7 '-..7 ...-7 '_.-, L...t t L-,yIl A--s '-r ✓�s,f I? 2 vt"s•f =--, `--, 2 1^ Y 2 _ 1. 0 f0 y '0 a f0 0 q'' ♦h e I f✓a le : N -- - f 0 8 y 1 l'II3 ' 3 3 ' p ✓9 ♦ , V d f 1 i( i / y 19 • ,o 1A . 4 ,,re°I / � I'd' (J11 "4: f1•• \: 4 I °1 .1 \� ✓4 zo• 5 ,,t ��) i ^ (2Asa 5 (28) o y0 ) 0 I/e ' y /p y2 f,,0 21 • , 6 t '-, r-, : r„r<v 6 6 • i�r� l4� J a 9 q ;��4 Oy / 4 / Y _ f ,o 22 w tf ,w� I ��o+eon. 7 * _-, '6 15 38 37 36 35 34 3 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 s > .28 f6 9 12 ,134 15 16 - 3 5 II8TH ST -maw roN"oa ICI, Z VAC a !.sa s7. 11 ° I'Iv",`aot)'I i A' \•S 1 ��l ( II w,. P ••wt'l • I /m II 24 23 22 21� 2 19 Ie 17 .>•I I - 4 3 14 z I 2 3 4 5 6 7 �8 9 10 II 12 IJ 14 IS = 2•✓a el" 1H •.'" ' t ,,., ,�, ...J/„1 j ',. 2 o f 2 el =� O /o ) o I O a I a o i 3 4 minim i ,) (. 5 a ♦ o• $ J4 jI or 13 °B322T5 24 > ,.tfs•' , ,. e Cpp •�sn L_ , _4,,a 9 a ••y ✓/c ,c /rL 37 1 '(3. :H,N Sr) I 'I f• L � rat 3c 136371 p! `♦ 1 t 311� a I{l 1 r, ' : 24 23 20 •19 le I7 ` 1 eL,u•, 1 .1 • I 00 j r • . 7 • oI '' cm i . ' .t"\:• 4 i 4.... .,. ... .,, .,.,, ,,,_ 0 .. il 3 8 I!, i�..y! > <1 1 .'♦ 1fi / .�-1 VI { d� z1_ • } r• II h• a.a,! i;4,- .l..r'1ii `• 6 I { 15 . a7 >• »a4 3a a2 a1 a0 29 iy 27 26 �. •'••.-2Z• • 7 O' 7 I 1 m.= '2 . ' 1 1-1� l rl I ' I I l 1 I I I I 1• I. I .1_I.I `.�•.- 2a= r• 15 c. 19 1, Il . a .. 3 e . s I. ,Cart arl '' •• 3 c ps4.n/ 4 _ l i'1D AV _{ PZr i1 oo 2,. ._ - s 36.27.737 J 3 ,.5,5 (s Y.R.•.D ST. fVy ^ LoO •• Q o .3 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 R 12 13 14 IS roj ) °•° •wl 4' a % • I �{05 er't gL 0 0 9 0`:5 "q er 4 ^ 1✓ IJJ 7 Zoo 5a I OJ ` 1 \ 0 P I. V e v y 0. 9,.a 1 J0^r- - •- J 46 I j ,,'° zo• I 13 '/-s- Epp b, �1 #p`3 9` o 1 6`g `--'a o o i._ 6"->--,° 1 f5✓ 21: •ss 0 17 ,. v 45' T I4 '7 s' ✓ h 1 ,y / 9? ✓ 4 . a' ,a4.b a 2 2: I w D Ys 6 ♦ 1 Z v. �P 16 I IIS .38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 f ,,..01 � I •_ I_o - • ,. " �� _ rsz/osa t s to.t.use. l 30 sst°.eO 2!`4 I no O 9t7 f/ +/45.30-3o w 7. - t...,,A'''' O M'�1. J eaJl7.ee e 2 6•I.1° ., e ,0 ♦° 426820 4.: t,t o II ST. 3 d,' Z '[ ,y R. P�- 7 ,� ' ^1f TTG RACTS,vo�.3v v6 �' •e z.n s d',4 `� RME TO O • Q o ,^ st a rs, u j R M ,e .. .. _ _ _ .. ., ,.ti f •[e 16 S j,l,O•00006 1 3 LE4JZ"�A >°5,7, :,9.17� �'t'1�w 1•°1o°h �' `,9 d' �' ,s�3Y'ol2 ad` $ ,r �3 14 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 1311a IS' . J I N h •--•• °' .'--, '-• '--, ,-, 0 c--7 `--, '-,• I7. to 0 °° .'f a° .. I 8 9 10 =,J,: /s,�e 9D �, ' h • _ • _ 7o II I- � .O•3 _ \ 1p ' 6 ,. 66 y\ t ., I • w 8 J es s,-/se J/o .9°.9) .sr az " 3 as es.a4el A!r.36 �, �� J 121 ST ST. ' Q y p O 0 ° 34•z 20• no 1 7e , ,,;0 7K.704 fo so .o sa 70 eo z.rso s / y B ? /p �' 9 - = O ' `es 0 'bl I '�� {I v-, C sss J.s.a'.[ :s.7/ ',; 1 = 0 1 �J' i ; • s.• 5'9 i ' t' 21' 1- n 4,�•00: �n 8•, O , o) p t.-, u`'->dl O I ter 8 `'-1-7 `� I y 1e JJJ v y 1 ♦ 28 L--,�'p— P 0 0 0 * e .7 D �I? o e 'no I 1 s 0 „°° 0 0 I' 'fl°I j0 N '^ 16 IS 1- .1 38 a7 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 27 26 25 24 se. 22` m j no u ,i e N C 0 ., • • v w 1w w e I" 41 J -} • D v .so m y ., is x.: 19s.°r. 233 I 0 °..) n1`n a `; "off °o °, ` : s' 8h1 Any to 4. 2° .li of `°°° it 4 u ST = Vir •••o a I A[f-s"7 !a S 1 i 1°°� o . 0 L� p 0©` - _� z\ 5 f 4 4e 5•'' r4t•Nr7..,.7w:f • o 4°0 ^o,V<, ,.�.�I,�.e° SF11lNTON AT VOL 6/7p � p A" I ,2 .3 +LI S 6 7 ! 9 101• 1 i2 IJ 14 I5'.!' ,1,7 0 ,e,o°0 4I ",, o ATI ER S LAKE/ sh , I�,0,: ° •4204400 � 1h' :`' �-.�-.>+.-..-,.-..'.-,'-,�.-7'---r'-•-,`•-•'-7 ♦ /so so'm .o se >o° /no •fe i° z°�+1 •1 . li {. LI Fa !18• "� (o•.46Na w,ProN $7', , 7 j Z �+ 54 • Frr. •`Y19. o • s - 5. 122ND 5T. °ac a.a_ \ ^ ✓ �'77,v 20. H vouANo sr) 3easa.xt „es.ss.x".fs.°. 'e 37.09 3 /=;—, 3 o .��-, � - /ro •law o.o /a•. �_`s AC . "e7 - • O • , ' k 22. I i ( e 11 4.•`;.•T sus x >s.e>z ,. 2 �, e'I ,.i 3°+f�`1 a _, 16 O 38 37 36 33 34 33 32 31 30 29 ?e 27 26 25 24 J I ..-, 3 2 LOT^e Los �5.�� < n: z 1 ^ - i - _ . .r_ .• f ,11 23^ I '2 ,�oeo5. c 'iv,2 ,'•o,- : {I f,ys.k. A e ..i. .MC�,,d Oi •n r, ,. RENSP' 26-76 2•° 5 7 ' '° • ei5,D 76g1907S3 °° Sf060.065 � o° • -' r�.'L A j v 7:� _w ar s. _s ,�,. x� - 00 > ,u / S' ,� 1 ` � ,r 9 I ! 0 ,I a I n' a . , 3••°,..s a i 6 sa 26. <7 c 2I13 4• P 1 2 3 •• 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 112 13I14 15 w . 16 '• •'n °o z ,d('/, ' ? s \ \\ l4 p 1•1_„• u 4 'o, -4-,0 ;p '-, 7'-•'--,.-•'--r.._7.--,"''''iiiiii.-, �111•••...I.-.`7! II • -`,5 w S \O/♦' e � i \ \ 4 ( 7 f I 5,�,S _ V e{• S e 6 N „•, _ 55 ,. , •'eo• a f ° z I �J'g °o a ` �� •-', : 3 ..L Alf° i 0 0 `--' a `'' d P ,1 • 7a•� �• o ': °e°• '� • +.' ^+f•, .� •,p',.I •. ,T 6 n 3e 37 36 35 34 3J !� 30 29 20 27 26 25 2•Ir-F. ✓ J , i 1* •^ °t4 0� 4 '• .`r a y " U vsr e. ^°,,.'s j1- 1 ,I • '•41• J I J -1♦ f w 9 �„d'°os°. ..g.u`� 0O V�e ,,. O � •y j� ' H•+l 'J .. _ .JJ _ _J r°.�J.1 Jn 1� V c- - �7 •- AT 2 13 14 ' 2 4 4 5 6 7 e 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 1 1 T• 16 A :II • I'�.:,Z' i . 6 • ►. T " • •n '...,1 g..-7•--i1a-,a-7 '—. L-, a-� [_7 a-7 I AT 17 ` Is a Je rSS.oJ Ni e9.13.,L /Ls L> I 4./7 °�', 1�11 �,t- /4 y \>; �' p 0 a, 0 �., � 0 y ; .Yf-,p"'1+j'-e- 2z 121,0�os: l ,- -2 'So z. }o, ,.o• n^ 24o f/04741 u9s. r5 - o .l'-Y�i :•� ♦ r 4 4 ,8 19 ,r •♦ ,,, 47 e ♦'. to/ es 19 . I ;, o u` - !1. 13 Q „ R i 6c I }II ° 1 ,u13 'ttos 9 s° ` i • . N ' lc_ • ...-,4_, s�, I' . 0 20 t 1•'izo,o• I,�': ..V o 6. t _ ^ e ^ .I, If) •2 24 2 dO O 0 0 •_.., o o��III 1 tot 11,+Pf 21 .1 r 1 e ♦ o . '0 Q _ 1 • : . .e o i C e 38 3 3 J 4 J .2 F J e .2 0;' '�s,f I ,,f •.sq ,t'>`3:` fe I , e !.s ?, o •e 116 b , 3e 37 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 Y4 1• 1♦`1 2 • '" •.'' ° _ rsr,; . w o e , .. u ^ N • a• w I J`J ; •�.•I a',,' ju,t .s •u,+ " ♦ ty--F `3f : e 2 1 ill aso 1115 22 4,..ze raw ssrs/eao ,./.3/ss • F p '•, 1 •9 ,e♦'F 1 9 't o°° - 2 °.'. 23• W ♦e - li - t ` w r /ro �',ra ; ,0 I o°o•v ' 44 I4 Py l s5o o� k••6 O ' 0 a'• p D ^' (n 0 I I I'>. 0 2s L. 4 `e+' 1 ° 3 s„7s s>15 n 4e 'V $ 16h,° op DD 1° •�u 3 •- ' �,. 2 nle 4 .• ,,` 1,I♦.�s•°d 1 •37°aa4 ,o°_O^ +° .o ,'0' n o°o .f . ' 7 0° p ' o' .Q. . 4 24w01 3 vpl. 582 2'. ` z 7• I 7t • � ' r °y's^to 0 2 ff - e.m ''\19 4 rt , !° S-VAN Q�, .11°oaoto U oot3 2 r� !.f w ty." S7 .�i .. op ,o,.j0 6tH Sj f,ae.. •,o.oe y•!• stt.4s 15 •a„ �yDd''O 8 o4 it, s KE a T n 7� STAo°jO 010 ✓M 'e - •o 3" _e'' no - E I tl o t, 1 t N. . c t` st ,+ •..a •YLO 8 w"o s7 !o ° v, 1 • 161 aa•r,..Ar - I n�� Q. � a I •12 i o \ $ _fs.•° �'-'.' • 75•` 4..... ....[S.._ ..». 6.•r, 7 ( �_ \ Q. r� > ............... ...............................--_-_-'____-- .................... .................................-......'.............'................. __............ ........................ ............ ........................... ................. ...........................-_'--_-_-__......... .......... -_'____......... _____' 17 17 WIN k gill 17 VIA qLp flu V-111, X \s' MATRA- 33 el All THE'4 zi•%! — G ---- — — — t LEITZKE _ �N".�., -_ ` , . —T-- — — .�I ARCHI TECTS I / s-- 1 I I 1 I C�� ' I / • i I ✓I\ BATH O-Fp1 KITCHEN APING = aC�� I--.I / --- ^/ =_i ..........::..........._.... T -�� p_p; 6 BATH 'L1 KITCHEN __ 0 01%14:N0 AVE.S.E. { ' ��. , II PINING Imo` 1 \� �_ .___ I y. O \`./ ‘11L 1 _. II TELIEVUE.WA UBLUGm V BEDR00M _ I 1 �_-___ 1 �-�1 -_� _—_ TEL 9 7.0414 9-9 Nf �i�-]OH3 ! I \ 1 `_J -1. 1 'PAGE 989.93T j , BEDROOM N - I -ll I P ; / / \ -_- ./ _ KITCHEN �� s to ma am; .0. ✓ BEOROPA EKING EKING _i I Fe Di W r I ISJ O DINING 0 \- I L - I[ --/ , II ..,, ill O �l I -„ f'EDR001., . Y r n� L.. ._--_-Try _.. - t Ei o SS m I I LMNG Z°�-' F 8'-Ot 1 ,I,.tl T; 5,`II } f3'-oX {2,4 u.rp" __6'.io"' 12_�._N.fs. J -O W zui� --_ TTT 111 6ZG { yo'-o oA \ ---.— 24'O' 9A. .. } - I\ O T r o w W i',S°I °aF. -1oiO 7 EDROOM oIJ .. KAYN 'S -011 7[9 5,F OI.-M ''EOY2OO1-A/ OUE 3A-f!-i '0 1',0` _ — __-__ .d 3 E'., Fp _111,0 - 241._e°- - 4'-0 . 1007 SF 1 'O 5E0VOOM /. T,V.0..Baru. 1,4' = I'.o° • job number pm.:S.'-.L_. _ &nen.s.L L. . data a/8/3/4 revision Q Q Q . A • A2 . • .. . LEITZKECsA, ARCHITECTS -"yeg • .....'''''''.. • ..::.:::::::!-.H::':!!:',s, 0102 142ND AVE.S.E • - --•- 4.1.- -'''""-..____ Y1 '4--- TzDELLSVUEiV/04A.498006 -•— Ft. 747.201. i _IZ 1 • _,-__.± __:_,-1.-.-.7.-_-:;_-_.-- " ---f.':-.7T.:7-2.f.-___. =Ill ' i . ' • • - --'---'- ...7.-:_''f-,"--:--i .--.-:-Lt-Z..-Z____-:7-_-7----::--.7. _.---.1.----::,_-_:-__ :177.--;--2,-_- .7.;-_-=iiit.4.,-,..7--=-_—__:,,,.. ..7......s,_ . ---___ I ''.--- 'p ---- • ,,--- ------.- -- - ,. ...,„, -._•-.,;;__,-,------ 1..„...„.,r„:„.„.,-.-„-_-•,-„=-_,-,,,,,,,,,:,,,,,„,_,_:,.,„ =_-„,„.,-....._,:_:-:-,,,,,:,---, j- • . ___ ._ • E- . r,_--s,.--_.4,•__-,)___,,--2_,-- 4.1.-_-_:_•-••-•...1E_1,----,., -.0 - ,,-.--, — r---,--, (eD, -- • M M i J1 1 R I f-I ji .W. -= Era _ .----: I riL-L.--•-.-ri-7,- I i 7.-=--' ----- ____- ----- [,-------' , r--1-1 11 1 1 LI_ 1 - • • • ----- --,:::_. ..•... . _ -: ..sAittirrsay.,p..41..61,1 -:------7-,---,-7_7-7.:-,-------,_...:,1;14..Fi ][tr.r..4...;••7:_ 1--_-•-••,_-_._-_f,s-,:___,-,._-.:.--,•-=:::,-.-, : , _..., ----•••-_-_-:..„-::::•--- E,,-,)_/ .4•- 1- ,.- 1 11,----- 1,1'01;1:-;,•.- 44;11-1-1- • - . -..MI 1,-Y-E.FLON•1:::,31-P(I- ..__ __,77,-' - ::.'..:25-,i.,, --•-'-A jP---jrf.-7, _... _ J 4-,-,-._ 4.,PA qi- '711 ii i 1. 1__L _ •,-_,-,:-L,_ .,.:,, _L-7 .=-1--,-ff:1,00'ii111 Ili--I---=-3_-t•Ti—J1- / L-_,---11 ,__UI. r ! I LITY , , 4.,,,J,....,z;.,.vE......,.._.., ,......,. . .7, 6;=.77-4' =:,--,:--:-.=,- _ ..=— _-_,--,.- . 1:•- 1 : - 'T P, 1 1 SNAILE-, ' 1:'' 1,''''''. '_----i--';.r"..rft-T ,'- .L-7.r. ' '' I. • .' - '--•-------------71 -\\ -5P•Sel,15,,r-rr 9.;__--7.'El•------- -';"=---'-__.---f---------T--. --"--1 .1.11..-711-1 --;\------e.gign—f-be(:dIE,I,D •I=-1,-I. -.1- fa r______.1 'Fin 1 I li I _ _ r_____,_, L 0 1. „i ii, 1 ._ _,., 1 ., , 4._...„._ , , - ---- -- W44 rn_-42..,/ ._ •,,,,,d... -_ . 7.-t-77-7, • ! , I. -•1... .•\vocrt_mERCLAY,/,,,l'OR . --—— J —---.__I -- Z,,• 5u1-011,1C4 6161,1P0E. . . ,Lit-.1E.OF:SIOEvAi-k.e,R5.11tra'.-A,E 0 V,,,,v 8 •1 IAINviPe. 'A0TT0141 WIDTH - ,_. ' - - ., . ._ .... . ,.J ..... . r2. irg BLDG A-NORTH ELEVATION • 1/esg-I, BLDG A-EAST ELEVATION z. V)=F2 • 1 • • •`-','.„,E . I F,'-'•g . , •,• rr-L--•.1 ...--T--__—„,, -- - , ?I .1 •L -\-. ,_ _,Iii'EXTERIOR MATERIALS&COLOR SCHEDULE . , —M,, II 4 II Ili ,, , 1 ROOFING ,- . , 1 0 ASPI.J.T SHINGLES COLO.CHARCOAL GRAY jj i 11 .IWO 6g.lnvo BATI-I SEE 5111,2 . ..-1 EXPERJOR OWING: fo VINYL HORIZONTAL LEP 51OING COLOR/:TAN p VINYL HORIZONTAL 1AP SIDING COLOR.CLAY . 0 VW,HORIZONTAL Ur SIDING COLOR 3:AMERICAN O. I SYTERIOR TRIM. • 4 -E1,4 II ,... I . (Zi WOO P.C. COLOR:METE s II-- 11 1 'I.II (3 WOOD ALCM:.BAND COLOK:PRESERVATIVE SPINACH LEAF 0 11 .ii_ _II _,I-• —H----1- II l'I r.WOOD PICKEIVVECR.RAILINGS: COLOR,WMITE - -' 13 RAIUNG Tor TRIM COLO,PRESERVARVE SPINACH LEAF- • - t Lie TO'L'-',--:'"-- "-------rI , I IL .11I 1-4-----II__ _11 - i 9/ 1-- I----.1 •-!L-.'_il_ TTP to , Z.o FL._ • 1 I! WINDOWS: $ntm cow.tYriliE AP TO . . , WOOD TRIM 0MVNLIOIV COLO.Min , =---r- I' • GUTTER&DOWNSPOWS , LOb• rumba 0 ALUMINUM MOP-WHITE . , Ili [[ irT-,„__ ____ ,, 1_ _.:-J--r 1._,-.4 I.1 7) 'ff" 11 -...-_A ,:- L___, !• drew.:51-I-. I 11---. — —7 1--- ,--I 1 date: it.i'Ve . ' j L la.-—,-— — —. . ' -1 1 L... --1 revision ii -'-ii-1 —l"— L\ IL-11 I 1 _____.r.,-1: ii .q j . _,_ --\ —,..______,, I Tr__,-_---1- 1 - ", 1 -II A • . . ..1.,---------- SLOG A•FIRST/SECOND/FLOOR PLAN A3 . tir.v.0- IMICIEREMI • , . TFIE reit 41{/rIAL I.il•ni', LEITZKE1411A ARCHITECTS • z:!'s.•-.!:•..!!:'.!:':!:.!: :! ! 262/25 lace) 51(- 2?atz/1 b, too7 ... . 6102 I CM AVE 5-E 64 oe) 09ELLEVUE,WA.98004 -7=- --Tt- 106747,414 207.747.6114 Mt cAP614 1 I 11glaCTIlli:ar...-Wi 1....41,105 - I - [ ... REGISTERED V--' '' --.6- E - - ,-- 1 ARCH ECT I i I,;. ,,,y12,,,r_617,4_ 4L 616ALK --- • , . - ,,...,.. MIt. ___ nr-il - rIt4176--..ctol' rorte,E,R,F3Iiii-G1L.k.41 ' Li —I FT'rl . 1+ • 1-- 1-- 1 i 7—1 t, I 1. 4{-7-1 --, it L — - 1 r— '------ ' 1,.., M r -II 7-11 Pri_,M 1111 ..., , t1-.'62.64. -''''----•_ 'i='- I I 1 11 - I't6 _._-_,-..-.....E I.- Z ez,.?.si.4-r. ,..Ig.c. ,21.- . .13LOGA-.WEST ELEVATION _ _tiera-o- ! < . ., a.6 < i R' . .. 3 t 6 2 g 5':,'• BLDG 67.SOUTH ELEVATION . ' z 'A E OS . .. a. bntrnber pm,: .L.L.,-- dream:s.L.L..__.-. _clate'sfibigeo revision A A A A • . . A A4 minswini -- . . TI-IE: fi LEITZKE . AKCFilTE-CT..c . , ,,,o,5 723 llt...11T iSTAiciOlt_ I 5R/La./23.ukillr_st_. 2 e:Q/.1 6 6eet.ur/.:1- tsrAtal.,2 _--„...2.af2/1.13-04,9 Lli-liT.. ,' ..-----------1": ., _____,...1 4:'•,•`-'-r.-,.-,„,,,,, F!"-- 9 • .... i : ...:„ _________ BULL:11.10.1-,t....g,, 01„ ''" <--....''''''-'' /f- < ---. 1 IREEZEMEREI r—r— 11:- „...---------' ------------....,, .,..,-- 1 -' Fri - . LI -4-- I - - .-T.1 ,__ 1.1111111111[1111 ---L f firi 0-70— ___,LLE__•-i, kli•T-1.; [...c • .., XII or 1.1.11.01 .1 II • - ". - ---- --- ''''--- li -1-'------ ' 1 1 11 1 .--4- . l.:-. ll—, .. .. _......, wii = --.4 Thir.1 r---r- --- - ::••••_;_,J,_ , . i , „ • __-, _ , - -____1 1 ,._...,1 - =• • : _..,I rt.•:„.tL,-.ow:pc!, ‘ 1__L_I,- !sr pL.:1. 6,..d ..., _____MEER _—1--- , i In • Ili-I 4 1----1, 9 IT . Oli-`--' 1111; MI L':÷7 _ 1 . •......, ? 1 Ril [-I— 1 -I — - I U . I ..'..:.'.:. 1 . tr., rm.] i-Thi r......t IFT1 F1. FF1 .2,_.„ ., <, , ,r- : F --',-.-._.%. a_,,,, 'Li I II li 1 l' d 1 i. I-1 T,p7-- -..- Ji lii ! -: Irpt-SS./AT..k O.RALNIErZ AVE. . • 9__. -• -14 BLDG 13-50thH.ELEVATION 1/03,-0- _ - i3LpGB-EAST ELEVATION. thr.r-o. z§,...,. • ..- - ,....„.=______ •. - . --•,1 _Ls: ji 11._ [ _ 1:- -- 7_--.--la-.r__ I=-[\'—'7'- :.-.7 - 1(1. . ir------1----„,„ ,,- 11.._._,_ ,.ir- iF q I —1' 1,-- .•. . I 1:-.--i L_rI L.! 1=1_.__, jo.o..--..11-=---- ,Hr..=•„-, ,,-----11. ------- • . , L'7- ,J - -', . I.1 . ,TwO RV ONG GAGS sorsKr., •.:L_. ..:--:-.-1 i L:il 41 1, il 4 _.,__. II ' 1 L„ 'Ji li 1 I Li'j''' ril ri,. Zz%G:-,TIE E010 ..,___ _j 1 .;.' I 1 L_ J..„.____LI ii_ _1 11_ Il 1, ._____.1 1 _i II _II ... .. ._...._ _.._. _ T liJ ' „IL . „.4.,„urni„., . 1 i! . ,, 11 rt...— ,—.1-71., ,,,,,.•5.1.-L. i, Li Lril .• ,,j1 '\\ '1 dr1 II:I SWIGS 11 III. ' 1 . . 7 , revision .___ 11 ' 1----, . , A .„4 ,, , . IL , A ,, H _----,,r---- ,f-' 1, L L--,--i ----_-_;.'l ,___,,;-_____I 1 , A 19,-_,' , j . 1.__,J1 i.— L---I] il ,,,_ _ , : . . BLDG B-FIRST/SECOND/FLOOR PLAN A5 ,„,-..r.o. • . • THE::,,•:::,..• LEITZKE=,,4— ARCHITECTS �I _.- \_��— t -"< Ill rLL a--.. ;`-=:_tee,_ Y.. ...... \ — — - `- ----••-- 4 E :::::BID21ab1DIN_ E... -yi .....r y _____, t -_.- - I . r ._.__ ;;I(E)"leR pE L'ELLE+UE.T/P 9B006 _ _ _ _ �r��—I4—yI�I i. T�`- PAP ]i)20P3 a r .._ �- r�' I— - II tl II PPG 9Z39 7"i I r 1 I:vLey L PL 14- ° .°'d .befsr'u Co2v:,------ — .1— '� r T— _ - _— ___ -—1 � ,s /-avit-oluv.L LI 1AEcinu� ,ST R... Sv.DG. - .- ._.-._ _- -.__ ___� -.__. - _ _ _ ___ '�—� pztcl oT LT-FZ,t_.".s .', — _. '— Sr+ovtNivDa77 UR4DE / �i mn u,w .11 e�mt _ -- ___--_ _ - ____ BLDG B=WEST ELEVATION ve-.ro- $— — z BLDG B - f to-NORTH ELEVATION ve•.ro- w a d is: s : < �z d 3LL u,�5'm z m z m = cea f 0 Z z to'<,I E ue< i l r< K a. O Sb'umbe pmr s.t:.1- dromn:sa..t... .. date:altivv revision A A A A • A A6 THEi.411.401 LEITZKE a.: ARCHITECTS ealla'�23uutr.... suer; 1me/16 923Lu1r1 ro o / I 8'-11Lo14U.NT 32:.80 / 1' eu?b.NL�ieoo' .. J4 • �- / \ �. % a. �� w /F�GISI ERED Gt llL D \� -_ 1 l _ - o f `—r • ' i�`. 71:1 I �LTf'�I • (��C�RADE'•.SO.ty�� —� � (E)C•112A1J�'- �— 1 I� SLR➢�wa4lhGmn . — 111 FFI J II I J r-__ _ Lu W� UL� r— iJUL?I u� ofY GI Lk L10.1E'�—=__.__ KER-( ..ELDG Ca SOUTH ELEVATION . vB•u-o• SLOG C-EAST ELEVATION va-=r.v m Z' o ¢ BLDG C--NORTH ELEVATION- StMILAi� -- - - BLDG C-_WEST ELEVATION_-_ vB•=r-o• SlrnlLa2. --- P-t 2 3 f. �.._ Zs�z • oWe`<ozE G�w« • W<�o� _ : I I II. 3 i • { O Z T 2 11��TTT d O • . .. , C, 3--- 1-==1 J • • ONE BR/ONE M. —� -=s see s�cix 11 —__I ,-_- -., '_'__:. pm.�S.L.L... . 1 -drawn:SL.L.. • f t.— L_=,if \ date-- /&o,'--. revision A w 0 , -zt„.._i--- [ i,t.,_ Hkn -- LhHLI_ A .. _ -BLOG.C-FIRST/SECONDLTHIRD FLOOR PLAN. A va-=ro . . , • . . THE.0..X. LEITZKE'.,..... ..J ARCHITECTS :'•i...1.,••••itwi:J9112i — •._..73,%.:.,--: A .......... .......„;„„ .. . 1 ._... .• 6.14270 AVE-6.E. 'BELLEVUE.11r,90002 .._._ ._.. 12 i TEL. .7-0414 -. • , i ? i F. 1747-2086 PAGE 66.9.9375 -1\ -40 •--...'- ...--.-.--- ! r-I-11 '''.- -..'...'1,1'.'--.4,..-.--1 1 '.-0-. , ----..... 1 MailiNKSO 1 1 : --- REGISEELO _., 51017,0.4010ri 1 1 -,•1.ii r Illf-I--1.1— [II IT 7_9' .` gif I [ril iTli I:pi 1-c).c,311 1 f r , H i [Id r : . f - T_______T1 . , -,i . ) .a..' —1 rillA li _ ______,___ . ,roi . ur - M 1 `i, . g ET' n . 1 pit it:Ti 0-7- ii --1.ri mi Frm t -,), . 1 ,_._1 „ fr -r.---1-----_-_ t- us JP !__ 4_------1 1-1 ri miL__LI L 1. — _ ,__, ..__.,..„.„..0, ____. ,..__ ,..,.....,,,,... .._..7!4. ti- . . — _ -- FT:T-1 • E;-:: 0 • 1 a s.....--- Li . I 71 u-4.L' .7, _..... z F:F. .. --• -- • L3 ...BLDG P,WEST ELEVATION 1/17..140. • • . . - LTI BLDG D-NORTH ELEVATION ve,r-o- ' . - • e,2,',o` ae... '0 ,) •cl tl L''''' F..E g . II ;r-'.7•. .a,..,-..4 . 6_,T.,..,,. .1.1., -ii, 11 ;! fr-------- -I rvil 1; 'r Ill 1 . -91 II i ti SFZL.IFLeoe.'-geAr 1! TWO BEI TWO 0.10Ft KS.ehlr A2 „ 4 III III !I I. in • 4 .1 tit ti o. H tot „ it II 1:tit a-ill it 1.i — r,--'-' n n tt it tt 6 7---------a. ii 1, ,, 1, 1 -.; ,•_,9_____,I_____Ij• tr,E . IF - - 11_ ______11.,„__.:11 . ,. :i i / ,.1,r/L_ ,4 „, ,, ._. ,, foat,_,.,„„,,,L.,,,,, //, . . . , li Tim ._ : . .• „Jf 7 • • ,-, OA 11±'''- -7-''L--- '' , lOb rumber , • .\—` •- ,- --• 1/1. , L . • „_____• sl. _____I........ = • .• =___, pra:SI.r1.. .. :1,le,20' A1,20' 10',I 2o' • 10,‘22.' 10!,e 22,1... cirenen,si...L, , date,vsPer.. -c&e.Aov• revision , • , . ---....- BLDG D-BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN A& • 110,1,0. "JIMMIE). 5...., THE.t.,5?..7.„-5,,,,,A LEITZKEr.,.,--„; ARCHITECTS 5 :•,-5;,:,.:44n7,1,4 ... . ............:..:::.: +IC,Z.7' •m 1-1 ..+_102.7'• I 1 1 —.- 1 .2 I gelfeianKME —,.. - Ea REGISTERED i 1kfi ; E la rTli I I • i I --- V 't I II i r .. .. 4i_.. i 1 _ -,,,,rr. -9 --7-1, k ! FM ---11 1 _L__J n 1 lu 1 isI ITIEI -i ,,-4 Qe...PE •------ An raj I 1 ---1 a i ___I r2 ............ , .....:72.1, • •-•----61c7E 1.' _' - --- E 2, nu ill -1--) ri iii I I] m ; 4 ne r,,,. -- - - 3.1 --ii Ian ji it_ Il ,L_Li [=11 1- 1 .., ';--, z • 0 '''-',.3..::' ...;..j.a....._ _-------;-_____ PAR.I•eklo 07,ZAer LisveL Et.fr1,00 f, ._ .• r io3,12ei.-J - BLDG D-EAST ELEVATION . lia,r o. it,-,N4PS-r ,Z vi0'444,6146" BLDG D-SOUTH ELEVATION tara-o- O`2':c 6 z E _ as,,o°._ ..r 2' 1 E g 1 ii____ ,—,Er _ - 1 _ _ ._ . . 11 ,T. , I .; 1 i _ -__- : [ II 71-4E—IL —_,J II ,--- u jOb number . WI revon r MO ERE/IWO ETAlli KZ SKr K 1 1_ ____LL___ A 1 [. L , - A . 1-1_ A SLOG D-FIRST/SECOND/THIRD FLOOR PLAN - A9 . . THE11111,"111RI: • LEITZKE411,.1141 ARCHITECTS 0,:ppliti'bill. ,.. :. 1.u/1bn3'UNITHSE,LIZAILLte/l!,_723in.liT 1.. __..12Wilt:71.b_y±lEr_....,'511,11,2 -..18a/15 72/yT II:IIII.Iii......III:II•I•i...:, I _I .211_,,_,,F1 - I 6102 1.12ND AVE.S E. BELLEVUE,WA.98004 i:.... ,-," ''''---"--- '' :,--. • i -.- 206,147-0.41.1 ' . r ,-,--- ---,,,., ..„..,.-------- + a.4.od Skno..n .. ,....,....„0. 919-9375 PAM . ...... 1 ' -17'.--.-....., - ! -------_ .----- /-- - !I_____17ir! .., -------....„.! . ----- ----, --0_ ,u -- t-r-f- .. ,!..- FFI ..1---p, _....0 T-, -_-.-.,...., , ---- 1r-1--H---7 F-•-• 7 11-- ..,t1,E.Gil.rtEilip MINX 9x,ITOV F- .. - -- ——. -o all M.71- 1------- 1 . III__7..1 R. If •---7 T - ,,..__, P l'i I-1 1_111 1--f--I IIM 1---] ______ __ ,,,J,,,,Fl.,. . 17-_:,„,-.2t 1-•-lj=4 L _ r.\1_- 1 I =.1____ --- I'l ------------_—..- - A ----=-.-.._: 012. v.a =:' . --r-0 ___,.. -et_vee.....1..1 _.....,,. , F---- , , - ------ i 1.—--.1 •-- [t-171 _ =_---- Eli :-.5. r _ 1 .,.." ' _ ______ • w . _ -Ilsr-fLEI. •- .. 0,411-.1Z _-___,..___-.. -_____L____j_l.L___ _____._::-_„.____:______L .-_ - - -7•"4, ,---,.., ,,A, . i — ,.__ ----_, ,- _ ‘-/-----------------1 \---lw.v.,1•Aaizeuk?_ . -__________ kg" I VAR22.2/2TNA,JLIC.11-.1" i g P - I / .-"-bUIL.17I,Y.5.,6107,1406_ BLDG E-NORTH ELEVATION err-=r-o- cez V o 8 BLDG E-EAST ELEVATION ,ve,r-o- 'BLDG E-SOUTH ELEVATON. vEr.r-o- ,•J IkIIII ZI ' . Sou:n-1 SI.,51."NrIo.c..1•1S.R,S. ZSE:•9E_LIORTI•1 L... 6 BLDG E-WEST ELEVATION 00,1-0" . - EXL5Fr"iST-Irt.:00K PiVe5 Wen"Flava PAR-KV& 2. • .-\•,,,,.asr MLioNok-r710f4-1716--.- . , . Atoip-SXISVO.AVW?-1NUM..-.-C6R.405.IS .koo -, _ ----_--RRN,E425M-or...:M.N.ST..-_-ELEVAITIokl t,', r,'1'0 . . - i .249..!......„ _....-___.......24.'-eel' _____._ .1.!--0! .......„2,41-p 4.:, -- - E1E ,,STAIR. I 1.- , STAIR_ . - „3 --if II=t_ T----- ,---] ___ -1 •I I__ __, .,, 1,.. • .___.. .,_ I- j 1 • . N2 _ [.../ ., [ ..1__-. i. - • .,_. ..- _..' . . r--; ------1, , I\, . „._ ,, ,,‘,,_ 00E00f0200E 0,,TH . • • • i ' '-- - 17_ ---1_, . _ _ • - - . • F .1—__ I _ ._ IF - • L 4, L.,,,,i,,,,5 . STcuus&E. L.c.kozael sTo e TOR,. E. amg.-Loe.karzs Sroakva L.o.leareTi jOb number . L---I 1 —1 r:- -___T ,_L_____ -I. II ,J1 F—___ r---- -_ • ' da 1,mn': 1-‘,---- ' . 12'.xeJ li'vesl 0'xgvi. [2t Tb'' .' I 2%2S• III<21! • - ••.I ex•231 • ..12Iv2oI...- anti Veirie. , A • !.. 1---- -- 1 ____ *---- 1 _ Li-•7. . , L ! ,,• 4 • ____-- _—•• .._ _ ,____, 2,,,,,3..fli• _.. In . . . - - I A10. -BLDG 5--PIRST fi0Olt-PLAN'-- . MOMENIEROM . . . . . , THE:,..1..•,,,,,,;0,..1 LEITZKE''.:,Zct::1 ARCHITECTS :,•.rE,I,E,PL,ISIrEEM :II I::: :E::.•:: : EIDE IADROAvE SE DELEEME wA.EPODE TEL 747-04ld Pm 747-2004 PAGE 9138 9575 : IffiiiIEIZiNIfigiff .e.•E4 opiii: .... REGISTERED _ AR (GT . = --''''.---, EL•9970't..uorbikr-r-CIF-It....A.irog-. 0,•0,, GAZE Imam* _ ...E.r.._ 44 .3°--: i P-11Tv ,--,:?...21 ,.; ,,,,i-,-,,',,mi +,imail,,,,,!,:i4 H111=114-4 1 — 1911011111111V .,,,,75,4_11,Riumism..-,_ .! ,--1,2.00',,,Ej IrgEllaW.Grj. .... , -=III! I ,s,-:4_-__.. _-,:E..7.- ,_1 _ <, r ! :;,--,'-- :7—, :Ii7--: ------7. -. ., .'t -.-::-•:'.7. 3 1,, 1 III: 111:'-I.'::- PIGS.; 1,,,sodi ,,;-77 -- !COMetagWYoruUnt r-/ - vC2 E g:4 _WAL-.1.:1_1r4E r cokevi- BLDG F-WEST ELEVATION 'I/8,-W i SLOG F-EAST ELEVATION tier.r-o- ,..__ -. , - . — =-- . r : „,,y, r 11-1— n r ) WORE/ODE DATE ---r1 I ._ fi9F_E SKr. 1 1 .4 Cr—11 ;II . --,a \ 7, ri• _ —I, jOb number LI 1 , TELL----- ; ___., _ p .TELL[._ 1 ri- drawn,5...i.., revision . . fii r---E A A A • A . All BLDG F-FIRST FLOOR PLAN 118,,,O. OPIEENffil • THEpi,,-*-,: LEITZKEJs: ' ARCHITECTS . %.... r. I agile, 723 Tee '--- -6L,I17 t 1 atm 142.140 AVE SE I FAY 747,053 t5LLEE ur , ri ' ..,,&.-37<d_HY enGE 989 9375 ,...„. ---------................H_ ,..Ire REGISTERED , _ - I 11-11 171 1 i --I-7-1 minim _ _ 1-- ir El EB _-1-- _,--1-11 [_, -... b . , __.....____ _, 1 ---------' .•••,.-- ' — 11111M -.----- „1 df_____ • 1-1 r_ri El rti ________ _ ....__., ; rr_i --. i I ___1 I T1 ' C.4,4OieCt_OilVE i...,--7 -._ I , -- I : 1 1 Fr , ...„,,_ L----, L1 , , 1 ,, I mmu R7---7E i ---- ,-- 1 _ 2w ''',1" ---121--- - ------ -- :L_Lp.;__ 4 __ F___- _______ b-- _ _ !c4 ril ___. I. 4- - — - <= s 'd -, __.._ 1—ev,Igi4kVLeigirg..%'orlej7j.. LD BLOGG,SOUTH ELEVATION _ _ WA,- ..EIG6,-.WEST ELEVATION_ ol 7.../ 120,(..7E.:Esfl ST'(/ fry!,Plef,p_gi_ya.c t 1:13 304 .-SR,"FLooR WAIT .; , BLDG G-EAST ELEVATION II Pr.r, ,,,,,,,, E,6_ p3 ,04 —;....0 FL L,W ,,,ooLIT i-74.. 3 511.41Lese, r-IELVE71CA SOLI? 1.3 1n4 —163-FLOOR 120,.,17 z .._ 301 302 . 201 202 t"2 A t3 94 101 102 -- 0 1. , r------L, -1 [7 --1--- A- ,---- 1 , ,41E,13,1,,,,ONE DNS 1 i 1 'OFE an/ONE Dfr;n1 Li] 4 I 0 1 . 11 I i 1 ___11 !I _ IL__ __ il -- _ ___ 11— ---1. - I :'_. - :IV t 1. 5,o,z.N.os-Locktes STorzkle LockmRS 1 ,7:-Taittozi--LOcke8..5 SIORACIE_LOckt2S-_,_- iOb mmber 7 J._ —F ] - — 11 11 , ' I 1' - - _ — pm.,S L L, 12',25' 114 291- II,.t21 12,..23, 17.!x234' III,2SI 1.11342 12'4 291 - ddte: /L,/94 ild4t. . WA:24•0S;ry11 revision L 1 , .s-- t , ,___ A : ' L . Al2 V-PG G-FIR-.57 FLOOR PLAN - IIMIEFEAMil , . , • - • .I ' I is • is • ARCHITEL IS . ,. 6.011$.0(ff 1.(0',22;•0E7-.. --- ' . --- ---.---4-___ -411 7.0.401- .r.-0E)2161114(.4 (0I22.,0 , ., -__. 0102 4.2210,2.5.E. • BELLEVJE.WA.0.2006 : - 1 :Mod TEL. 247•0414 _.----- -.---... ;.... . -... FAX 741.2022 2/kGE 0090370 I /-"--- -.'-'-'',. 11.11.11.1M1 ..„, c,/ .• . . ,,....-- . . .. .. .. . . I 11 ,.,1 .... . . „_-ce-,-- --2,- ;1--FirFri1-.T.74- ' ------7------,1 1 ,,.' ... awsitrj . 'IliChL15-1:1V)1:71":11-771•1'. 4 ,..;"—_______.--=, • ,j,7.,-,:-- .1;s--A.B-----.`.-7---,,I,',..'',' 1 I,',!..'l 1 -.1:1 !!!!,,.71.,-4-i h•11,,•: L-71__ — ,r4-,1-rj", -----11T,--- p .. .----1:r.,-,•.„. ,I1 j I,II:4;1 I! ! -... OVA -r •I 4 '!" -12. .—1 ' • 1.......1..t7':-.....:-'---•-•:::H'i'17...: .7) sun,el.Sit.OX • FT 1 iii 1 1 _ :: .. • , •. .. ___ , 1 / - :::rr"---.,_::---- = -_ _---- ...........,....L......„..........._____i_FL :*VOI', .• z , ., -s• . I ,REC-SOUTH ELEVATION Ya-,..ff.a .. . ' • • ---,_ - I IF 8,L„,' &-c, .4,-4,- . .- - . ..- - < 'g______ Z' 0 1 . I -1 1 I i-----, .ii,,_________ 1"----' • .• 1 , - 1 I ; i• ; -------, .— • • • Plli'i : • .mum= ; ,; • 1— , .,...,_. . tzlct2.5c • --:-.-. . , • . . -, , :---, N . __., --,,,, • 1 .= ,•- , , s-r,,,z, c., ...... • . , 1 11 _ 1 1—, •\/1/' . -. . . I I 5t,..L...1._. I I . s,t_p_...1-, -. ,.x.,,,,,s..., —1-- ' , Ps.1 E • .. .. .. ---r.--_,.i, . 1 27-- L 0 ,,- ...: •., :. , • , •,.. .. . • . - , ,....,...„ . • ,. F.,..,_,____...._•,;,. • . _..,° :• 2.„,,...0„,..„,4_....0 iveri..- ;:f ,.:'. „. I 1,-IT-,-.' ,r rIEJ ‘x '...., • t •- •' •SPA•' - ' ' 1 I I '. /': •i,,,.`',\'s_l-- I I . ,_1 . .,,>':','-‘, -. ./ .... / •. ,-,, /z-, . „ . . o 0 • , 's-x.'-,,•,>,,,':,,‘, <:`,..;')..›./ :, . 1 I , ,' '', '. -..A ,,,. 'X ,''. /Z.Y\)" 1 i 1' .\ ,, .../ .• \:•</.).,,,x\ . ., >, :x. , .. ..e ....,• . [. , ,,./ • ..... -... ,\ .,-....-.: ,-.,, -...\,,,, ,, ... , ,,),•,... , icib number .• I ' I -,,,- . •._____:),/,,' . ,- c, ":'.ss.„ • '''\\,' ,./ ..... 1........... , '.‘, ' 1-' l''' .. . _\'\. ';, __ ____ 'I. x,\`.yts.at.i6e.,,, go ‘„,..,.,.,./.,1 .. .,...,, . .,:. . - . 1 • j, 7---- -2. ,., -• \\ ,...-.42,,,,,„3. ., ,..,, I i 1', •. .''..A.,;,,;'`--.l'.'\`\>. \', \\•,,,\,,\ ,'('<,,/i .I><"--.. ••• '‘x.)<• r 1 •p.m.:S.1...L.... . . • • ‘s •I' •-- , .''...,,‹ ,. (In:mai:SA-I-. • .1 ' ..*:‘X.\‘:,<'L. ‘,•.:..*'.. s',• • ‘.e.,<\.:' ' - --.<\ x. 1 I. ' . „ I 1 .• : r LI- i 1 .• 1 .)-7, ,,;1.4-ik.44_srrtstgL...ffet4e, . -1 . _ . •1 1 -411-,' 1 A I\ hii lliti ' '1 , I : 1 •;1 •Aly-r ,?..le.-_A-.-. . - , - I - , IV I A , • , f -- - .1 , _I A .• ill/ • i . . • I I • Al 3 _. REC-FLOOR PLAN l9IO . IffelliMMISSII • • THE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS . • — • --- 6102 142NDAVE 5.E 006 T--(a).Gw.9E 0P,I.e 1+. �D • • " ra /". /i�-�� . TELLEIRIE.WA 90. l %v • TEL ]4]0414. /l________Y �. � FAX 4]-2095 T -� .AGE 999-9575 f j I11,-I�I I 1 ltl lyi l 16,1 m qutERLO 1 _ I I 7 1�_ `NAKER1baJN" ,o '�'-� - - - ® -- f=-IJ - — - -- --- "-� ,..._,A„..„,_! __ I '` ; �I::;:rlil,1,l,.'','L�+- 9NINllL - • 4, "Sb:FDO-?L;EL.:_". __ - _ - _.. ..._—_---- � Z _REC-NORTH ELEVATION -. q•,r.m _ - REC-EAST ELEVATION w FOP 'Lo9S_.6EE SLIEEr A3_. ____ <a .. .... .. .... - 4 • u NJ'LO• Z m ,L2 El � Z 1 eW['<o wj= u=teg� MI., N a L.'. S • job cumber pm.:S.L.L. dramn:5.LL. • • dote:V 15194, revision A A A A14 EEf ' laill 1 70 I. ri" ■ IIIIIIIiIII im-ii- ID r...:1 1 x . v. . ' rTrr1. , , . ' ' 1(0 -7 0 38,'5•6 ( t.6.) ` GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY ' ' : PROPOSED RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS : RENTON, WASHINGTON E=7186 L"`_- : ; ' March 21, 1996'. PREPARED FOR" 'RENTON CROWN LLC" iaymond A. Coglas Staff Engineer'', , :ie.- -- 4g , 11 ..4 °.t,S't' ' . - Robert S. Levinson, P. '', EO9 ��--`'% Principal ? '3�2�/�1� Earth Consultants,' Inc: o, . °1805 - 136th Place Northeast, Suite: 201: 4 t T °'F Bellevue,:Washington`98005 �. *.;;V.. i (206) 643-3780 o,�R �4,1 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT More construction problems are caused by site subsur- technical engineers who then render an opinion about face conditions than any other factor. As troublesome as overall subsurface conditions, their likely reaction to subsurface problems can be, their frequency and extent proposed construction activity,'and appropriate founda- have been lessened considerably in recent years, due in tion design. Even under optimal circumstances actual large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/ conditions may differ from those inferred to exist, The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how the Geosciences. qualified, and no subsurface exploration program, no matter how comprehensive, can reveal what is hidden by The following suggestions and observations are offered to help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays, earth, rock and time. The actual interface between mate- s rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report cost-overrun and other costly headaches that can occur during a construction project. indicates. Actual conditions in areas not sampled may differ from predictions. Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated, but steps can be taken to help minimize their A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING impact. For this reason, most experienced owners retain their REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET geotechnical consultants through the construction stage, to iden- tify variances, conduct additional tests which may be OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS needed, and to recommend solutions to problems encountered on site. A geotechnical I engineering report is based on a subsur- face exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS set of projectlspecific factors.These typically include: the general nature of the structure involved, its size and CAN CHANGE configurationl; the location of the structure on the site and its orientation; physical concomitants such as Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly- access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities, changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engi- and the level of additional risk which the client assumed veering report is based on conditions which existed at by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory the time of subsurface exploration, construction decisions program. To help avoid costly problems, consult the should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose • geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors adequacy may have been affected by time. Speak with the geo- which change)subsequent to the date of the report may technical consultant to learn if additional tests are affect its recommendations. advisable before construction starts. Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not natural events such as floods, earthquakes or ground- be used: water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions •When the nature of the proposed structure is and, thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical changed, for example, if an office building will be report. The geotechnical engineer should be kept apprised of any such events, and should be consulted to erected instead of a parking garage, or if a refriger ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre- determine if additional tests are necessary. frigerated one; •when the size or configuration of the proposed GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE structure is altered; PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES •when the location or orientation of the proposed AND PERSONS structure is modified; •when there is a change of ownership, or Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet •for application to an adjacent site. the specific needs of specific individuals. A report pre- Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade- which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid- quate for a construction contractor, or even some other ered in their report's development have changed. consulting civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise, this report was prepared expressly for the client involved and expressly for purposes indicated by the client. Use MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS" by any other persons for any purpose, or by the client ' ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES for a different purpose, may result in problems. No indi- vidual other than the client should apply this report for its Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical only at those points where samples are taken, when engineer. No person should apply this report for any purpose they are taken. Data derived through sampling and sub- other than that originally contemplated without first conferring sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo- with the geotechnical engineer. A GEOTECHNICA ENGINEERING der the mistaken impression that simply disdaiming re- REPORT IS SUBJ ICT TO sponsibility for the accuracy of subsurface information �' always insulates them from attendant liability. Providing 1 MISINTERPRETATION the best available information to contractors helps pre- vent costly construction problems and the adversarial Costly problems can occur when other design profes- attitudes which aggravate them to disproportionate I sionals develop their plans based on misinterpretations theseof a eOoblemsathe l geoir echineel n caP engineerort. To should be klp avoidale. retained to work with ot1 er approprite design profes- LEAD RESPONSIBILITY -, sionals to explain releva' t geotechnical findings and to CLAUSES CLOSELY review the adequacy of t, eir plans and specifications relative to geotechnical i sues. Because geotechnical engineering is based extensively on judgment and opinion, it is far less exact than other design disciplines. This situation has resulted in wholly unwarranted claims being lodged against geotechnical BORING LOGS S OULD NOT BE consultants. To help prevent this problem,geotechnical I. engineers have developed model dauses for use in writ- SEPARATED FROM THE ' ten transmittals.These are not exculpatory dauses ENGINEERING RLPORT designed to foist geotechnical engineers' liabilities onto 1 someone else. Rather, they are definitive dauses which Final boring logs are developed by geotechnical engi- identify where geotechnical engineers' responsibilities neers based upon their i terpretation of field logs begin and end. Their use helps all parties involved rec- (assembled by site pers'nnel)and laboratory evaluation ognize their individual responsibilities and take appro- of field samples. Only fi al boring logs customarily are priate action. Some of these definitive dauses are likely included in geotechnical engineering reports.These logs to appear in your geotechnical engineering report,and ; 1 should not under any circumstances be redrawn for inclusion in you are encouraged to read them dosely.Your geo- architectural or other de ign drawings, because.drafters technical engineer will be pleased to give full and frank may commit errors or o issions in the transfer process. answers to your questions. Although photographic ,eproduction eliminates this problem, it does nothingto minimize the possibility of OTHER STEPS YOU CAN TAKE TO contractors misinterpret�5ng the logs during bid prepara- tion. When this occurs, 'I elays,disputes and unantici- REDUCE RISK pated costs are the all-ti o-frequent result. Your consulting geotechnical engineer will be pleased to To minimize the likeliho d of boring log misinterpreta- discuss other techniques which can be employed to mit- tion, give contractors read access to the complete geotechnical igate risk. In addition,ASFE has developed a variety of engineering report prepared or authorized for their use. materials which may be beneficial. Contact ASFE for a Those who do not provilde such access may proceed un- complimentary copy of its publications directory. 1 • � 6 Published by • AsFeTHE ASSOCIATION OF ENGINEERING FIRMS PRACTICING IN THE GEOSCIENCES 8811 Colesville Road/Suite G 106/Silver Spring, Maryland 20910/(301) 565-2733 I I 1 i 0788/3M %��-1 Earth Consultants Inc. Ir, IS)` 1J Geotechnical Engineers,Geologists&Environmental Scientists March 21, 1996 E-7186 Renton Crown LLC 704 Northeast Northlake Way Seattle, Washington 98105 Attention: Mr. Mark Lundberg Dear Mr. Lundberg: We are pleased to submit our report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Renton Crown Apartments, Renton, Washington." This report presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratory tests, engineering analyses, and review of the following geotechnical engineering studies previously performed at the subject site: 1) Shannon &Wilson, Inc., Boring and Test Pit Logs, dated August 1979 and June 1988. 2) Golder Associates Geotechnical Engineering Study 883-1538, dated November 1988. Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the proposed development is geotechnically feasible. Medium to high plasticity silt was predominantly encountered at our test pit locations. Some shallow deposits of silty sand were also encountered at some of the test pit locations. With the exception of test pits TP-8 through TP-11, the medium to high plasticity silt encountered at our test pit locations was generally soft to depths of six to twelve feet below existing grades. The soft silt was encountered to depths of two to three feet below existing grades at test pits TP-8 through TP-11 . Below the upper deposits of soft silt, stiff, medium to high plasticity silt was encountered to the depths explored. Varying depths of fill were generally encountered at test pits TP-3, TP-7, and TP-8 through TP-11 . Fill depths generally ranged between approximately two feet to twelve feet with the deepest fill encountered at test pits TP-3 and TP-7. Slide debris was encountered at test pit locations TP-2, TP-4 and TP-5. This deposit was characterized by approximately six feet to ten feet of loose silty sand and silt, with isolated zones of moderate to heavy organics. In our opinion, the proposed buildings can be supported on conventional spread and continuous footings bearing on the native stiff silt, or on at least two feet of structural fill, provided the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into the final design recommendations. 1805 .136th Place N.E., Suite 201, Bellevue,Washington 98005 Bellevue(206)643-3780 Seattle(206)464-1584 FAX(206)746-0860 Tacoma(206)272-6608 Renton Crown LLC E-7186 March 21 , 1996 Page 2 We appreciate this opportunity to have been of service to you. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please call. Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Robert S. Levinson, P.E. _ Principal RAC/RSL/kml TABLE OF CONTENTS E-7186 PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Project Description 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 Surface 2 Subsurface 2 Fill/Slide Debris 2 Native Silt 3 Groundwater - 3 Laboratory Testing 3 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 General 4 Site Preparation and General Earthwork 4 Foundations 6 Slab-on-Grade Floors 7 Seismic Design Considerations 7 Exclavations and Slopes 8 Site Drainage 8 Utility Support and Backfill - 9 Pavement Areas - 9 LIMITATIONS - 10 Additional Services 11 APPENDICES Appendix A Field Exploration Appendix B Laboratory Test Results • ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Test Pit Location Plan Plate 3 Typical Footing Subdrain Detail. Plate 4 Utility Trench Backfill Plate Al Legend Plates A2 through Al2 Test Pit Logs GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS RENTON, WASHINGTON E-7186 INTRODUCTION General This report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study completed by Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) for the proposed Renton Crown Apartments located along Renton Avenue South in Renton, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1 . The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site, and based on the conditions encountered, develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed site development. In developing these recommendations, we reviewed subsurface information at the site previously obtained by Golder Associates and Shannon & Wilson, lInc. At the time our study was performed, the building location, and our exploratory locations were approximately as shown on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. f Project Description We understand it is planned to develop the site with approximately seven, two to three story, wood-framed apartment buildings with first-floor level parking garages at Buildings D, E and G only. The remainder of the site will consist of asphalt pavement areas and landscaping. We understand considerable regrading of the site will be required. It appears the most substantial cuts will be required primarily along the north and east portion of the site. We understand the existing 4H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical) slope along the south side of the site will be regraded to an inclination of approximately 3H:1 V. At the time this report was written, specific structural design information was not available. However, based on our experience with similar projects, we would anticipate wall loads of approxin ately two kips per lineal foot, and floor loading of less than seventy (70) pounds per square foot. - If any of the above design criteria are incorrect or change, we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this report. In any case, ECI should be retained to perform a genera review of the final design. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Renton Crown LLC E-7186 March 21, 1996 Page 2 SITE CONDITIONS Surface The subject site is located along the west side of Rainier Avenue South, approximately in the vicinity of 119th Street South in Renton, Washington (see Plate 1, Vicinity Map). The property is irregularly shaped and is approximately 7.5 acres in size. The east boundary of the property borders approximately 530 feet of Rainier Avenue South. An existing warehouse and office development is present along a portion of the north property boundary. No - developments are immediately adjacent to the western and southern boundaries of the property. There are, however, residential developments along the top of the bluff that borders the west a1nd northwesterly sides of the site. The predominant topographic features include a ravine and the previously mentioned bluff that generally trend north to south along the west side of the site. A small drainage course runs to the north along the bottom of the ravine at the base of the bluff. The site generally slopes down to the north with a maximum elevation change of approximately ninety feet. It is evident that the site has experienced some disturbance in the form of benched cuts along the middle and lower east portions of the site. It appears some fill and slide debris have also been deposited primarily along the north and portions of the east sides of the site. An abandoned asphalt road runs along a portion of the north side of the site and accesses the upper bench trending east to west through:the middle of the site. The site vegetation consists primarily of grasses with an abundance of blackberry and scotch broom. Deciduous trees are present along the west and northwestern portions of the site, along the ravine areas, and along the lower southeastern portions of the site. Subsurface The site was explored by excavating eleven test pits at the approximate locations shown on Plate 2. Please refer to the Test Pit Logs, Plates A2 through Al2, for a more detailed description of the conditions encountered at each location explored. The following is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. Fill/Slide Debris Fill and some slide debris was encountered primarily at test pit locations along the north and east portions of the site. The previously referenced Golder Associates Study indicates varying depths of fill are also located along the west side of the site. The fill ranged in depth between. approximately two feet to twelve feet, and was encountered at Earth Consultants test pit locations TP-1, TP-3, and TP-7 through TP-11 . The fill was wet, and was generally characterized as soft, medium to high plasticity silt and loose silty sand. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Renton Crown LLC E-7186 March 21, 1996 Page 3 It appears some slide debris ranging in depths between approximately six to ten feet is present at test locations TP-2, TP-4 and TP-5. It appears this deposit has resulted from periodic instability of the upslope regions of the site, primarily along the ravine located on the west side of the site. The slide debris was wet, and contained a significant amount of organic material. The soil conditions were generally characterized as loose silty sand and soft, medium to high plasticity silt. Native Silt Below the fill and slide debris, medium to high plasticity silt was encountered to the depths explored. The silt was stiff and generally fractured. Some mottling was observed along the upper por ions of this deposit. Groundwater Light groundwater seepage was encountered at varying depths in the majority of the test pits. These seepage zones generally occurred at the contact between the loose fill and slide debris, and the native silt. Groundwater levels and the magnitude of seepage, however, are not static; th+fore, fluctuations can be expected depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the water level is higher and seepage rate is greater in the wetter winter months (typically October through May). Laboratoni Testing - Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or modify the field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering characteristics of the soil encountered. Moisture content tests were performed on all samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided at the appropriate sample depth on the individual test pit logs. It is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in guiding our engineering judgement) ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. In accordance withour Standard t Sta dad Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for this projectli will be discarded after a period of fifteen days following completion of this report unless we are otherwise directed in writing. Earth Consultants, Inc. • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Renton Crown LLC E-7186 March 21, 1996 Page 4 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion that the proposed development can be constructed generally as planned provided the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into the final design. The critical geotechnical aspects of the planned development.are primarily associated with foundation support and reducing post-construction differential settlements. Based on our understanding of the proposed site grading and building locations, it appears some of the buildings will be located in zones of cut/fill transition. The western two buildings on the north side of the site, and the southeast building appear to be at greatest risk for differential movement due to cut/fill transitions. Portions of the two northern buildings may be located in zones of existing fill ranging in depths between approximately four to six feet. To help reduce post-construction differential settlements, portions of the buildings located in zones of existing fill, or on newly constructed fill, should be supported on at least two feet of structural fill. Additional removal of unsuitable fills may be required, depending upon the condition of the existing fill and final grades. Building slabs not supported on competent native soils should be supported on at least one foot of structural fill. The requirements for structural fill are defined in.the "Site Preparation And General Earthwork" section of this report. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill Ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area for the exclusive use of Renton Crown LCC and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report, in its entirety, should be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. - Site Preparation and General Earthwork The building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all organic matter, and any other deleterious material. Based on the thickness of the root mat and topsoil encountered during our exploration, we estimate a stripping depth of approximately four to six inches. However, these depths may vary and will depend on conditions encountered during the stripping operation. In building areas where greater than two feet of fill is to be placed, and in paved areas with more than one foot of fill, the existing surface need not be stripped. However, long grasses should be cut and trees and shrubs should be removed prior to fill placement. Stripped materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Renton Crown LLC E-7186 March 21, 1996 Page 5 Once stripping operations are complete, excavations to building and pavement subgrades can begin. Pavement subgrades and the ground surface where structural fill is to be placed, should be proofrolled. All proofrolling should be performed under the observation of a representative of ECI. Any areas that are found to be yielding or unstable should be repaired either by re-compacting the area, or overexcavating and replacing with structural fill. The use of a woven geotextile placed on the overexcavated surface may be useful in bridging over unstable areas. Existing utility pipes to be abandoned should be plugged or removed so that they do not provide a conduit for water and cause soil saturation and stability problems. Due to the fine-grained nature and in-situ moisture content of the soils encountered during our exploration, the use of on-site soils as structural fill may be difficult. Much of the existing fill encountered during our exploration was significantly above its optimum moisture content, therefore, considerable moisture conditioning of these soils would be required. The moisture content of the competent native silt encountered during our exploration was generally at or slightly above its optimum moisture content. These soils will degrade quickly when exposed to wet weather conditions. The success of compacting these soils to the requirements of structural fill will depend on the moisture content of the soil at the time of construction. To help stabilize wet soils, the use of cement, or cement kiln dust may be considered. Structural fill is defined as any compacted fill placed under buildings, roadways, slabs, pavements, or any other load-bearing areas. Structural fill under floor slabs and footings should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density, except for the top twelve (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent. The maximum dry density should be determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at oar near the optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum density except for the top twelve (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. • Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Renton Crown LLC E-7186 March 21, 1996 Page 6 Foundations Assuming compliance with the recommendations outlined in the "Site Preparation and General Earthwork" section of this report, the proposed structure may be supported on a conventional spread and continuous footing foundation bearing on competent native soils or on a minimum of two feet of structural fill. As stated previously, it appears the western two buildings along the north side of the site will be partially located in zones of existing uncontrolled fill. To help resist differential movement at the cut/fill transitions, additional reinforcement in the foundation elements, ten feet on either side of the transition, should be considered. All footing overexcavations performed in the uncontrolled fill zones should be observed by a representative of ECI to determine if additional overexcavation is required. Structural fill placed in overexcavations should extend outward from the edge of the footing a distance - equal to one-half the depth of the overexcavation. Footing excavations performed in competent native soils should also be observed by a representative of ECI prior to placement of foundation elements. Exterior foundations elements should be placed a minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches below final exterior grade. Interior spread foundations can be placed at a minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the top of slab, except in unheated areas, where interior foundation elements should be founded at a minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches. With foundation support obtained as described, an allowable soil bearing capacity of two thousand five hundred (2,500) pounds per square foot (psf) can be used for foundations supported on competent native soils or structural fill. Continuous and individual spread footings should. have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively. Loading of this magnitude would be provided with theoretical factor-of-safety in excess of three against actual shear failure. With structural loading as expected, total ' . settlement in the range of one inch is anticipated with differential movement of about three-quarters of one inch. Most of the anticipated settlements should occur during construction as dead loads are applied. Horizontal loads can be resisted by friction between the base of the foundation and the supporting soil and by passive soil pressure acting on the face of the buried portion of the foundation. For the latter, the foundation must be poured "neat" against the competent native soils, or backfilled with structural fill. For frictional capacity, a coefficient of 0.35 can be used. For passive earth pressure, the available resistance can be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of three hundred (300) pcf. These lateral resistance values are allowable values, a factor-of-safety of 1 .5 has been included. As movement of the foundation element is required to mobilize full passive resistance, the passive resistance should be neglected if such movement is not acceptable. Earth Consultants, Inc. • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Renton Crown LLC E-7186 March 21, 1996 Page 7 Slab-on-Grade Floors Slab-on-grade floors may be supported on competent or recompacted native soil, or on at least one foot of structural fill. The slab should be provided with a minimum of four inches of free- draining sand or gravel. .In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, a vapor barrier such as a 6-mil plastic membrane may be placed beneath the slab. Two inches of damp sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. Seismic Design Considerations The Puget Lowland is classified as a Seismic Zone 3 by the Uniform Building Code (UBC). The largest earthquakes in the Puget Lowland are widespread and have been subcrustal events, ranging in depth from thirty (30) to fifty-five (55) miles. Such deep events have exhibited no surface faulting. Structures are subject to damage from earthquakes due to direct and indirect action. Direct action is represented by shaking. Indirect action is represented by foundation soil failures and is typified by ground failure or liquefaction. The UBC Earthquake regulations contain a static force procedure and a dynamic force procedure for design base shear calculations. Based on the encountered soil conditions, it is our opinion that a site coefficient of S2 = 1 .2 should be used for the static-force-procedure as outlined in Section 1628 of the 1994 UBC. For the dynamic force procedure outlined in section 1929 of the 1994 UBC, the curve for deep cohesionless or stiff clay soils (Soil Type 2) should be used for Figure 16-3, Normalized Response Spectra Shapes. Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. Groundshaking of sufficient duration results in the loss of grain to grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave as a fluid. To have a potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with a grain size distribution of a specified range (generally sands and silt); it must be loose to medium dense; it must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of groundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement for structures founded in the liquefying soils. Provided the recommendations in this report are followed, in our opinion, the potential for liquefaction on the site is low. • Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Renton Crown LLC E-7186 March 21, 1996 Page 8 Excavations and Slopes The following information is provided solely as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should this information be interpreted to mean that ECI is assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the Contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. - In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and Federal safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from our field exploration, the soils encountered would be classified by OSHA as Type C for the existing fill and upper soft portions of the native silt, and Type B for the competent native silt. As such, temporary cuts greater than four feet in height should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than 1 .5H:1V in the existing fill and upper soft portions of the native silt, and no greater than 1 H:1 V in the competent native silt. If slopes of these inclinations, or flatter, cannot be constructed, temporary _shoring may be necessary. This shoring will help protect against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workers in the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide shoring design criteria, if requested. All permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 2H:1V. All cut slopes should be observed by ECI during excavation to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed, if needed, to improve stability, including flattening of slopes or installation of surface or subsurface drains. In any case, water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any slopes. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Site Drainage The site must be graded such that surface water is directed off the site. Water must not be allowed to stand in any area where buildings, slabs or pavements are to be constructed. During construction, loose surfaces should be sealed at night by compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils. Final site grades must allow for drainage away from the building foundations. The ground should be sloped at a gradient of three percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the buildings, except in paved areas, which can be sloped at a gradient of two percent. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Renton Crown LLC E-7186 March 21, 1996 Page 9 Perimeter footing drains should be installed around portions of the proposed buildings where infiltrating water can damage interior finishes. Drains should also be placed around the perimeter of below grade foundation walls to help reduce hydrostatic pressures on the wall. The footing drain should be installed at or just below the invert of the footing, with a gradient sufficient to initiate flow. A typical detail is provided on Plate 3. Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be connected to the footing drain system. All roof , downspouts must be separately tightlined to discharge. Cleanouts should be installed at strategic locations to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drain and downspout tightline systems: - Utility Support and Backfill Based on the soil conditions encountered at the time of our exploration, the native soil should provide adequate support for utilities. If remedial measures are necessary to provide adequate utility support, the unsuitable soil can be overexcavated and replaced with a suitable ballast and pipe bedding material such pea gravel. Utility trench backfill is a primary concern in reducing the potential for settlement along utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped to ensure_ - support is provided around the pipe haunches. Fill should be carefully placed and hand - tamped to about twelve (12) inches above the crown of the pipe before any heavy compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench backfill should be- - placed in lifts having a loose thickness of less than twelve (12) inches. A typical trench backfill section and compaction requirements for load supporting and non-load supporting areas is presented on Plate 4. Pavement Areas The adequacy of site pavements is related in part to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To provide a properly prepared subgrade for pavements, the subgrade should be treated and prepared as described in the "Site Preparation and General Earthwork" section of this report. Native cut surfaces should be in a firm and unyielding condition when proofrolled and fill areas should meet the requirements of structural fill. In localized areas of soft, wet or unstable subgrade, a greater thickness of structural fill or crushed rock may be needed to stabilize these localized areas. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Renton Crown LLC E-7186 March 21, 1996 Page 10 The following pavement section for lightly-loaded areas can be used: • Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB) material, or • Two inches of AC over three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB) material. Heavier truck-traffic areas will require thicker sections depending upon site usage, pavement life and site traffic. As a general rule, the following sections can be considered for truck- trafficked areas: • Three inches of AC over six inches of CRB, or • Three inches of AC over four inches of ATB. These pavement thicknesses may be modified based on anticipated traffic loads and frequency. Asphalt concrete (AC), asphalt treated base (ATB), and crushed rock base (CRB) materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. All rock base should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the ASTM D-1557-78 laboratory test standard. - LIMITATIONS • Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the design information provided to us by you, and our experience and engineering judgement. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied. The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the test pits. Soil and groundwater conditions between test pits may vary from those encountered. The nature and- extent of variations between our exploratory locations may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be requested to reevaluate the _recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. • • Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Renton Crown LLC E-7186 March 21, 1996 Page 11 Additional Services As the engineer of record, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction specifications. ECI should also be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. We do not accept responsibility for the performance of the foundation or earthwork unless we are retained to review the construction drawings and specifications, and to provide construction observation and testing services. Earth Consultants, Inc. APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION E-7186 Our field exploration was performed on March 15, 1996. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating eleven test pits to a maximum depth of sixteen (16) feet below the existing grade. The test pits were excavated by Five Ball Construction Inc. Approximate test pit locations were determined by pacing from existing landmarks. The test pit locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate locations are shown on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by an engineer from our firm who classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each test pit, obtained representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site features. All samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System which is presented on Plate Al, Legend. Logs of the test pits are presented on Plates A2 through Al2. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. • Earth Consultants, Inc. f84j1y le0 ST I .'�;N'4 r .?i y rl';'" ., .414. AVALON opir• i //' > W .x'.xr: ..e.> f A� • SE e � , _ 'N3TIN 'od• SET y KENNYOALE ''_, 36TH< . ,E,-. zm BEACH PARK I. ,.t/.� : ✓,$< :r•f° > a Se • .I .33R•D -PL ` ' ;-t: 4 sr.:i.:^,it'.s2:, '''' SOUTN POINT ••S.::',.. NEB''33RD;' COLEMAN =<>` I,: t'`u:::'- $-.. .i-S:7:' • POINT 1 i ;N 31ST'$T:=' u " .' ., N, .`31 • ST ' j ®'`30Tii``'za. `. sr 1� '` " r' "•'''f: : F., • ^,rt#"h1CREEK s� N '2g-m.'.. sr- ,�;; >: ',, : -', ' F`zr--irl � r.;;• ., s<:v ' ., 3c?:01 v; •.. -_ . ,._ '. NE:e;,:•:.:28TH'":. ST .LAKE iy 7�; . ;-: • ,, ✓. 2„H' .�:'- � ,,, ._;.:,:;s'i:�,'#,Wit.'• y r i^,:., . x • , %q --s .r :,rQ `'y. . r •,, '' ^tom.- ,;LLQ^_ F•'zt .:.-.':;k: 1'•'w":f •„`W z.oi KENOA5, _r_24TH;{ST.f:'l .w . :;;.N :< �,- -24T}i PARL y• ti'ys.' ? 2..t Q;. ..atr.,. <ia:..2:z`BE'S ;' I a , E. • . NrQttJ g::.. '0,5.4, BOAT LA H 1 r .Z $y :{i--...i O. 4 ! N '.Z `..W k 1.'t;T2 --_ '� i ':R,,-! Z Y��•W rxi `l,Yt..', 97. o NE ><S•`, ;a �1� ":s�, \I` .•>. 141/1.e- 3:.Si' 'rm Yz':� .�:.. A ' •a :T'«_f 5 ' ,%fir,:� .l, I�•-:•It.I� :gig. !,'•::: •°� k:a.�.:� _.,``-'?:.s: f ilk"B 112TH '.s<" EACH : . i;m t : . f.,.., ,t,12TH., �>'� i�li rr:,,., nt�.,.:`.(' '' r r;; �Ys :,' " ,..1:4 1_ RENTON :e'. „i,: '+h• *'` . . >r 1! •• AIRPORT y \. ;: ,<': t 5» 7 NE 1 O. 1 a BOAT:LAUNCN:..... ® .'• . �._ DL es sv' , TN''iC5 - r-• `;?� NE''10 1'imum. i4: :� y.,•;,'.,' L ©• • H © P L _ S 1 a :NE _� 1 �' B YN eTH �� _I .1A z = �L+•.,PARK © 1.9TH" E' :.! • • x' \\ NE :1by S i20TH STD-�� 17_sT `_' A ;'o'. :.< N``J :TH!.•ST I \ NE' a e S 121ST a c gym. 7e• . .7;. • • �. S IS'� 122ND ST ��T r z �o • N' <., \, d N.. Tz. , s NWTTH ST Z �,,,.. !p \ _ c o.x S' 123R0 ST ^ "', '. I 1`, _`�f�,— . 2_. l m j coo. o.z T'R i. 1 • mnR v, t 0 • • Reference: King County/Map 626 By Thomas Brothers Maps Dated 1993 di!'si / ... 'Ili\ Vicinity Map ttAii(if-#01 t1 EarthConsultantsInC. Renton Crown Apartments 1 / Ce�oledv,ical Engineers.Geoff a4 Ern1 x,ti,er,tal Scie,nLs�s Renton, Washington - Proj. No. 7186 I Drwn. GLS I Date 3/15/96 Checked RAC `Date Mar.'96 • I Plate 1 1 - 110 100 90 BO 70 // 60 / P 50 120 7////1/7 —/ 40 / GTP-4 Li'- , W. i TP-1 13 :_TP-7 ' 0 ,i -° 7P-112 1 TP- � -i- P� ,IftAt �nV� _ P-4 _ I 1 1 a- -a- C4Alti -1 -a ' ' TP-5 Approximate Scale /iL08c _ -• -o-�-11 0 50 100 200ft.i ' TP-1 -4- 40 r TP-6. iilli -o- P-10 i- \ _oB-2liir 13 LEGEND 111 '7P-1O9i 1111. _. 7P-110 i , ��_ o rP % GB-- 1 - ' - % TP-1 -.- Approximate Location of Ili P-9 ECI Test Pit, Proj. No. �- ' E-7186, Mar. 1996 130 -107VIA \ ' J ;:\ TP-1Q4o - = GTP-1 -o- Approximate Location of 1 ; 7P- 08 TP-f05 0- o- • -, TP-104A - Aug.1i1 b 9881der Assoc., 1 7P-115 • tti w , ' n ' G7P °; ' _ TP-1o1 -a- Approximate Location of ew 1 - _o_ -O- - - Test Pit by Shannon & Wilson, ' B-1 7P-101 GB-1 June 23, 1988 GB-1-o- . Approximate Location of '..))i Boring by Golder Assoc., 130 Aug. 19, 1988 � 120 G N:P: N 7° f -- fJ-1 -o- Approximate Location of 110 1� 00 00 1� 110 100 90 Boring by Shannon & wlson, Aug. 10, 197911 Proposed Building 11: Cif E��. ��,►� Boring and Test Pit Location Plan :(i'��,�1�IlI Earth Consultants Inc. Renton Crown Apartments •, \I \ E �Engi^ &Environmental�t Renton, Washington MMI Proj No. 7186 I Drwn. GLS I Date Mar.'96 Checked RAC I Date 3/15/96 Plate 2 • o � • __ Slope To Drain • o o A. . 0 ° • .o a� .o 6 inch min. - o .° ° 0 - eo ° : % ' •.. •:.p.•;00 . . 6.- .a . °o• : 4a� -0- o 18 inch min. •: - •.o•'° •.•• :••. '- •- a ' ° • 4 inch min. .•a -o' o •I .°.o o . ...' •- . • -o-_•.•.. :o..0•. .; ••;. �u ° a°Diameter • : . 0 - . °° . 0 . e ,.°•.. : :•o: :;•:-.;-' _._o . % ° o ;• ° Perforated Pip ..:= :. lo' o o o °Wrapped in Drainage CIO.00Fabric t • .e. f 2 inch min. 2inchmin. / 4inchmax. - _ 12 inch 1.1 min. SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING LEGEND • m '°c - Surface seal; native soil or other low permeability material. Fine aggregate for Portland Cement Concrete; Section 9-03.1(2) of the ° WSDOT Specifications. ODrain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid PVC pipe laid with perforations or - slots facing down;tight jointed;with a positive gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated plastic pipe. Do not tie building downspout drains into footing lines. Wrap with Mirafi 140 Filter Fabric or equivalent. d*. k. 44\ TYPICAL FOOTING SUBDRAIN DETAIL -4 =/y l_ Earth Consultants Inc. Renton Crown Apartments 1',/ VI VII) Geotedinical Engineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists Renton, Washington Proj. No. 7186 Drwn. GLS I Date Mar.'96 Checked RAC I Date 3/15/96 I Plate 3 • Non-Load Supporting Floor Slab or Areas Roadway Areas A- � ..Syfr.•rt ;rr SC�,4 Y''`v4 er+ of yrv:t?N..' a , ;;9:�•;.e,. % ° ° �° Varies 0 0 0 ° 9 5 0 0° 0 0 0 5• 1 5 Fo ot Minimum u nim • Backfill ackf It gp` 90 V ries a l oo=0o(to'l o PIPE o ;oa o o D•o•QoQo 4;. b°o.o°• O. Bedding Q°:°•O° QO•' o'• �•oo ;oOdQo.Oo:• � Varies ooO O.o.:•o.•Q oOO:OQ o:.°VQOP•o o o.•O.:g:o ° o°O.� U oO P. ti• °O JC V on0�o°�O•Q8Qon0�o? °,Qad;„oa°o:Ogg p LEGEND: • twoowl Asphalt or Concrete Pavement or Concrete Floor Slab • o°o a0°°, ° o 0 00 Base Material or Base Rock Backfill; Compacted On-Site Soil or Imported Select Fill Material as Described in the Site Preparation of the General Earthwork Section of the Attached Report Text. 95 Minimum Percentage of Maximum Laboratory Dry Density as : Determined by ASTM Test Method D 1557-78 (Modified Proctor), Unless Otherwise Specified in the Attached Report Text. v.o°.,•. Bedding Material; Material Type Depends on Type of Pipe and ;a0 o°;p• Laying Conditions. Bedding Should Conform to the Manufacturers �° •- Recommendations Recommendations for the Type of Pipe Selected. /Pt lak TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH FILL fikEarth Consultants Inc. Renton Crown Apartments I' tip Geotechnical Fsglnexrs.Geologists&Environmental Scientists Renton, Washington Proj. No. 7186 I Drwn. GLS I Date Mar.'96 Checked RAC I Date 3/15/96 I Plate 4 APPENDIX A Field Exploration Earth Consultants, Inc. MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL SYMBOL O GW Well-Graded Gravels,Gravel-Sand And Clean Clean GravelsGra Q n Q n Q n 9W Mixtures, Little Or No Fines Gravelly (little or no fines) M M Coarse Soils , , GP Poorly Graded Gravels,Gravel Grained 1 gp Sand Mixtures, Little Or No Fines Soils More Than GM Silty Gravels,Gravel-Sand- 50% Coarse Gravels With I gm Silt Mixtures Fraction Fines(appreciable Retained On amount of fines 1 GC Clayey Gravels,Gravel-Sand- No.4 Sieve gc Clay Mixtures Sand o SW Well-Graded Sands, Gravelly And Clean Sand opo�o� o c SW Sands, Little Or No Fines Sandy (little or no fines) d..>.aigq0:.-:a; S Poorly-Graded Graded Sands, Gravelly More Than Soils C:::':*::;;y;�jE?EE#t P y i:::.. 50% Material ::.::.'s:::::::::.::»::4:::::. Sp Sands, Little Or No Fines Larger Than More Than =- No.200 Sieve 50% Coarse Sands With SM Sm Silty Sands Sand Silt Mixtures Size Fraction Fines(appreciable Passing No.4 amount of fines) :' >;:' SC Sieve ••>::; � SC Clayey Sands, Sand-Clay Mixtures 1111 ML Inorganic Silts&Very Fine Sands,Rock FlourSilty- ml Clayey Fine Sands;Clayey Silts W/Slight Plasticity Fine Silts Liquid Limit I CL Inorganic Clays Of Low To Medium Plasticity, Grained Arid YS Less Than 50 j CI Gravelly. Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean SoilI ff I I QL Organic Silts And Organic I I I I I I OI Silty Clays Of Low Plasticity More Than I I I MH Inorganic Silts, MicaceSoilsous Or .Diatomaceous Fire 50% Material Silts Smaller Than And Liquid Limit CH mh Inorg Sandanc ClaysSilty Of High No.200 Sieve Clays Greater Than 50Plasticity, Fat Clays Size !, / /'' OH Organic Clays Of Medium To'High / / l` on Plasticity, Organic Silts `- PT Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils Highly Organic Soils 1, .,-), ,,t G.,u, pt With High Organic Contents Topsoil 4, 4, Humus Humus And Duff Layer ♦••••♦ Fill ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Highly Variable Constituents ♦♦♦♦♦♦ The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. DUAL SYMBOLS are used to Indicate borderline soil classification. C TORVANE READING,tsf I 2"O.D.SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf W MOISTURE, %dry weight 11 24" I.D. RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER P SAMPLER PUSHED * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED i WATER OBSERVATION WELL pcf DRY DENSITY,lbs.per cubic ft. LL LIQUID LIMIT,% 2, DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER Pt PLASTIC INDEX DURING EXCAVATION I SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL W/DATE �'* .,) LEGEND �1 i� Earth Consultants Inc. l (R:uux lu,,,,,unginccrs.Gaiiogisis&Ivn•iro,Ink•nldl SClciulsls Proj. No.7186 I Date Mar. '96 I Plate Al Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Renton Crown Apartments 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 7186 RAC 3/15/96 TP-1 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Fiveball Construction ±75' Notes: W t G .c+ � N G Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Sod 4-61: blackberry,duff a a + a (%) M ] e 11- M 7 LL N • ML FILL:Brown medium to high plasticity SILT, soft,wet 1 - 2 38.2M 3 4 s ML Native, Increasing stiffness, blocky structure 39.3 6 7 8 9 34.6 10 11 12 • 13 -becomes gray, medium plasticity, silt, medium stiff, moist,light 32.6 seepage at 13 14 15 Test pit terminated at 15.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater seepage encountered at 13.0 feet during excavation. a N N C) ie. 01; •!f►�• Test Pit Log �� ali Earth Consultants Inc. Renton Crown Apartments Renton,Washington Proj.No. 7186 Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'96 Checked SDD Date 3/22/96 Plate A2 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of Information presented on this log. • Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Renton Crown Apartments 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 7186 RAC 3/15/96 TP-2 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Fiveball Construction ±65' Notes: o •r ! �, o Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Sod 4-6": blackberry,duff w a .0 a a .o (%) • a o• IL i i • dl Vl Ul •� SM FILL]SLIDE DEBRIS: Blacl to brown silty fine to medium SAND, loose, •� wet(moderate organics, branches, stump fragments) • •� •. 20.6 :::::: 3 _ -becomes brown, some interbedded silt 4 • 17.9 �� 5 • 6 = -light seepage at 5.5' ML Gray SILT,stiff, moist 23.3 7 8 9 Test pit terminated at 9.0 feet below existing g grade. Groundwater seepage encountered at 5.5 feet during excavation. • • • a N N dAkv Test Pit Log illiiiirlyt..,31111 Earth Consultants Inc. Renton Crown Apartments Renton,Washington 1 Proj.No. 7186 Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'96 Checked SDD Date 3/22/96 Plate A3 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of information presented on this log. • Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Renton Crown Apartments 1 1 Job Na. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 7186 RAC 3/15/96 TP-3 . Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Fivebali Construction ±60' Notes: W a a } a 0 a Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Sod 4-6": blackberry,duff 00 • a • u. • I i LL G N ♦.♦.♦ SM FILL:Brown to black silty fine to medium SAND,loose,wet • • ♦• ♦♦♦♦ • •'‘'‘ 2 ML FILL:Becomes predominantly SILT, loose,wet 26.0 �� -organics(stump fragments) •+• 3 — -Interbedded graysilt �•�• ♦j♦•♦ 4 — ♦�♦ • ♦ ♦♦ • • • • ♦♦♦ ♦♦♦� -brown silty sand lens, some organics 30.7 .:.:.: 9 •♦♦�♦ 10 — • •♦♦♦ •♦• ♦ 11 — ♦♦♦� ♦♦♦♦• 12 ML Gray medium high plasticity SILT, stiff, moist, slightly mottled -light seepage at 12' 32.2 13 14 Test pit terminated at 14.0 feet below existing g grade.Groundwater seepage encountered at 12.0 feet during excavation. w o• • N N d1,* Test Pit Log o 1i s� gA Earth Consultants Inc. Renton Crown Apartments n 'WI' ; M1O ce°'va"'b:0'Engineers,cam i Envlionmental s Renton,Washington J Proj.No. 7186 Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'96 Checked SDD Date 3/22/96 Plate A4 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of Information presented on this log. 1 ' • Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Renton Crown Apartments 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 7186 RAC ----- - 3/15/96 TP-4 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Fiveball Construction t 60' Notes: w r c + o _ao o Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Sod 4-6": blackberry, duff a .0 a • a c (%) 3 • M ? O y O N N SM FILL SLIDE DEBRIS:Brown to gray silty fine to medium SAND, loose, wet, interbedded sandy SILT • % 2 ML FILL/SLIDE DEBRIS:Becomes predominantly SILT 30.2 3 • 4 — -some organics(roots, branches) -1'to 2'silty sand lens • 41.6 �i�i*i ' -becomes gray,wet, mottled •�i�i� a •:.x 9 •ii V• 26.1 10 NIL Brown medium to high plasticity SILT, stiff, moist, light seepage at 10' 11 - 12 Test pit terminated at 12.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater seepage encountered at 10.0 feet during excavation. CO a N N 14 tAi; •i4I\� Test Pit Log qv; �/ a1 Earth Consultants Inc. Renton Crown Apartments Renton,Washington J a Proj.No. 7186 Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'96 Checked SDD Date 3/22/96 Plate A5 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of Information presented on this log. • Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Renton Crown Apartments 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 7186 RAC 3/15/96 - TP-5 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Fiveball Construction ±65' Notes: o .c ! o Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&sod 4-6': blackberry,duff w r .0 1- c' a » (96) i a i IL i > ; O` H G 0 rn ♦i♦ SM FILL/SIDE DEBRIS:Brown to gray silty fine to medium SAND,loose, ♦�♦� wet, some interbedded silt • ��• 2 ML FILL/SLIDE DEBRIS: Becomes predominantly SILT, mottled ♦♦♦♦♦♦ -some interbedded silty sand • 41.1 ♦♦♦♦♦♦ %i -light seepage at 7' ML Brown to gray medium to high plasticity SILT, stiff, moist 34.0 8 s Test pit terminated at 9.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater seepage encountered at 7.0 feet during excavation. • • CD cr • N N «P, Ea>i, �u►>�� = Test Pit Log �� e'. ta°l Earth Consultants Inc. Renton Crown Apartments MO( )/\Itil tivp Geological Pia..Geologists aEnvioro�a�lSdaitlrts Renton,Washington J a- Proj.No. 7186 Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'96 Checked SDD Date 3/22/96 Plate A6 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of Information presented on this log. • Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Renton Crown Apartments 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 7186 RAC 3/15/96 TP-6 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Fiveball Construction ±80' Notes: o . ! ; Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Sod 4-6": scotch broom, grass rw t .0 4- • a . - `%J •L 3 G N N ♦•• SM FILL:Brown silty fine to medium SAND, loose, moist, interbedded silt ♦♦•♦ N•4+� ♦♦♦ 2 ML ALL:Becomes predominantly SILT with silty sand lenses 41.1 - 3 4 5 6 ML Brown to gray medium to high plasticity SILT, stiff, moist 7 38.9 8 9 SZ 10 -seepage at 10' -increasingly stiff: 11 12 - 13 34.4 14 15 • 16 Test pit terminated at 16.0 feet below existing g grade. Groundwater seepage encountered at 10.0 feet during excavation. a • \ N N /Or. Ear: 44111 Test Pit Log m I �i `-- ``aI7 I Earth Consultants Inc. Renton Crown Apartments �`II)/�1f�/\1iF ceologlets&Env4wrnenmisaerwers Renton,Washington Proj.No. 7186 Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'96 Checked SDD Date 3/22/96 Plate A7 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and Judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of information presented on this log. • Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Renton Crown Apartments 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 7186 MC 3/15/96 TP-7 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Fiveball Construction ±50' Notes: W t 0 .c ! cNi 7 Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Sod 4-61: blackberry,duff (90 i 3 i LL 1 7 i L G N N SM ALL: Brown silty fine to medium SAND,loose, moist, some interbedded • :4*• S404• 2 ML ALL:Becomes predominantly SILT, gray to brown, mottled,loose,wet 26.8 3 • •♦�♦�♦ ♦♦ • • %i 8 — -organics(stump fragments, branches) • s I L Brown to gray medium to high plasticity SILT, medium stiff, moist, light seepage at 8.5' 10 -. 11 Test pit terminated at 11.0 feet below existing g grade. Groundwater seepage encountered at 8.5 feet during excavation. • a N N Ae. pt; 44r,�. Test Pit Log m �� a� Earth Consultants Inc. Renton Crown Apartments - 'MIiiLi/\,ir11 .. & Scientists Renton,Washington Proj.No. 7186 Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'96 ; Checked SDD Date 3/22/96 Plate A8 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of information presented on this log. • Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Renton Crown Apartments 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 7186 RAC 3/15/96 TP-8 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Fiveball Construction ±45' Notes: .c ! c Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Sod 4-": grass w t + • a u (%) i 3 i i 7 a o u, N • H ML ALL Grat to brown SILT and sandy SILT,loose,wet ♦•♦27.7 ♦♦• 2 — ♦ p s MI Brown to gray medium to high plasticity SILT and sandy SILT, stiff, moist,light seepage at 2.5' 27.1 4 5 6 Test pit terminated at 6.0 feet below existing grade.Groundwater seepage encountered at 2.5 feet during excavation. • N N le) Ear: ,u►p Test Pit Log �� aI0 Earth Consultants Inc. Renton Crown Apartments Renton,Washington J •- Proj.No. 7186 Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'96 Checked SDD Date 3/22/96 Plate A9 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of Information presented on this log. • Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Renton Crown Apartments 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 7186 RAC 3/15/96 TP-9 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Fivebali Construction ±45' Notes: c .c ! y o Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Sod 4-6': grass (%) is o � i Oa • Vl fA Vl •• ML FILL:Gray SILT and sandy SILT, loose,wet • • 37.8 • 3 ML Gray to brown medium to high plasticity SILT, stiff, moist, some 23.0 interbedded sandy silt 4 • s Test pit terminated at 5.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater seepage encountered during drilling. • o• N N r7 ��►~ pay: 44IV Test Pit Log �� 9 Earth Consultants Inc. Renton Crown Apartments Renton,Washington J F Pro).No. 7186 Own. GLS Date Mar.'96 i Checked SDD Date 3/22/96 Plate A10 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Renton Crown Apartments 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 7186 RAC 3/15/96 TP-1 0 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: Fiveball Construction ±45' Notes: c .c •a (J y c Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Sod 4-6": grass W as a (%) • S • v_ i L . 0 N (, SM FILL:Brown to gray silty fine to medium SAND, loose,wet, some ♦•:♦♦ nter ded silt • ♦ ,. 11.5 2 ML Brown to gray medium to high plasticity SILT, stiff, moist, some interbedded sandy silt 3 4 Test pit terminated at 4.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. • • co a N N Ae- E��: 444� Test Pit Log to �� a/ 9Earth Consultants Inc. Renton Crown Apartments - Renton,Washington F Proj.No. 7186 Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'96 Checked SDD Date 3/22/96 Plate A11 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of Information presented on this log. • Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Renton Crown Apartments 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 7186 RAC 3/15/96 TP-11 Excavation Contactor: - • Ground Surface Elevation: Fivebali Construction ±45' Notes: c .c o w c Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Sod 4-6 :grass (%) i s i I i 7 i H H CA ��i♦ ML FILL]SLIDE DEBRIS:Gray SILT and sandy SILT,loose,wet, some • interbedded silty sand :• 2 Q ML Brown to gray medium to high plasticity SILT, stiff, moist 3 4 Test pit terminated at 4.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater seepage encountered at 2.0 feet during excavation. co • a • N N ,«";_ AI; ,ul,�• Test Pit Log :�� Earth Consultants Inc. Renton Crown Apartments �th>/\ Y��,�ll! .. 8 � Renton,Washington J a Pro].No. 7186 • Dwn. GLS Date Mar.'96 Checked SDD Date 3/22/96 Plate Al2 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. APPENDIX B Laboratory Test Results • • Earth Consultants, Inc. 100 80 x 60 w z CH H 40 A-Line Q J a. 20 • la a Va' CL-ML WIC) 0 20 40 60 80 - 100 LIQUID LIMIT Natural Key Boring/ Depth Soil Classification USCS L.L. - P.L. P I. WaterTest Pit (ft) Content • TP-6 14 Gray SILT ML 49 • 30 19 34.4 Atterberg Limits Test Data �!*� Renton Crown Apartments r11'��; Earth Consultants Inc. P oeotechn,ca,Engineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists Renton, Washington Proj. No. 7186 I Date Mar. '96 I Plate B1 • DISTRIBUTION E-7186 4 Copies Renton Crown LLC c/o Mark Lundberg 704 Northeast Northlake Way Seattle, Washington 98105 Earth Consultants, Inc. Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 20000202000125 PAGE 001 OF 005 02/02/2000 09:24 CITY OF RENTON EAS 12.00 KING COUNTY, WA Title: UTILITIES EASEMENT Property Tax Parcel Number: 1 Is CO - 3 070 • • Project File#: Street Intersection or Project Name: RGMO04 SOWN RPl'S Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Renton Crown LLC 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation Lrl 2. . The Grantor,as named above,for or and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to o the above named Grantee,the following described property: Additional legal is on page 4 of document. o (Abbreviated legal description MUST go here) N LEGAL DESCRIPTION: • C, P Vl cx+e,r Kam Eaw..rnev\{- betrt3 et_. t orhon LOTS 1 1 - roL>el IhGIu lock. 2,4, I ,� Br\t 1 lO LL V 0.CGD rc��rl� Tr1� �lat N • -t-Ale-re o-F re co rc4•e-4 In vol L me_ 5 0 Pi o is , k.IY\s Coa. • ;.o -b9 eAl ex- w l 1 • n Qp�rT1 cO Y� o -o-t-' S . I i e S-• • • • H:IFORMSIKCRECORDIEASEMENT.DOCI Page 1 • FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 • That said Grantors), for and in consideration of mutual benefits,do by these presents,grant, bargain,sell, convey,and warrants unto the said Grantee,its successors and assigns,an easement for public utilities (including water,wastewater,and surface water)with necessary appurtenances over,under,through, across and upon the following described property(the right-of-way)in King County, Washington, more particularly described on page 1. (or if full legal is not on page 1--Exhibit A.) For the purpose o constructing,reconstructing, installing,repairing,replacing,enlarging,operating and maintaining utilities and utility pipelines,including,but not limited to,water,sewer and storm drainage lines, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor. Following the initial construction of its facilities, I' Grantee may from)time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: I. The Grantee hall,upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement,restore the surface of the easement and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work,as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. 2. Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement as long as such use does not interfere with the easement rights granted to the Grantee. Grantor shall tot,however,have the right to: a. Erect pr maintain any buildings or structures within the easement;or b. Plant trees,shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage to or interfere with the • utilities to be placed within the easement by the Grantee;or c. Develo unreasonably landscape,or beautify the easement area in any way which would increase the costs to the Grantee of restoring the easement area and any private improvements therein. Lrl d. Dig,tunnel or perform other forms of construction activities on the property which would disturb the N compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the tight-of-way,or endanger the lateral support facilities. e. Blast within fifteen(15)feet of the right-of-way. c o This easement shall run with the land described herein,and shall be binding upon the parties,their heirs, successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. By this conveyan e,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever, lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors,administrators and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this 22 day of July 19 qiq • 411 E,; • H:\FORMS\KCRECO RD\EASEMENT.DOC\ Page 2 Corporate Form of Acknowledgment State of Washington County of On this 2 Z day of Sk lY , 19 gici ,before me personally appeared 6n S. Tan to me known to be MCtnac tn5 r-1 e.n 101/4?,-• of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and each on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. �gtEEI�Jo,p 4p�� Notary Public in and for the State of Washington • V•ss1ON ;r �� Notary (Print) S he'�� cn�es •6)NrAgy�; M appointment expires —3—ia I y 18, zca�. • UBL C ;_ - OF 18ti. )� o ✓�illSll gAS0��\ a 0 cv EXHIBIT"A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Must be stamped by a P.E.or L.S.) _ li CROWN APARTMENTS WATER MAIN LEGAL DESCRIPTION. l 1 jl A 10 foot wide easement for water mains and appurtenances, the centerline of which is described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Westerly, right-of-way of Rainier Avenue North it wt1ich is 337.78 feet North 11 44' 57"West of the Intersection of the East- West centerline of Section 7,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W. M.,and the Westerly right-of-way of said Rainier Avenue North as shown on Relcord of Survey #98061909014; thence North 89 50' 57"West, a distance of 145.86 feet; thence South 05 53'55"East, a distance of 236.00 feet to Point"A"; thence continuing South 05 53' 55"East 14.51 feet; thence Sciith 89 59' 26"West, a distance of 157.95 feet; thence North 07 57' 57" West, a distance of 2.10 feet to Point"B'; thence continuing North 07 57' 57"West 253.60 feet to Point"C"; thence continuing North 07 57' 57" West 42.88 feet; thence South 89 45 01"East,a distance of 176.2 feet to Point"D'; thence continuing South 89 45'01"East 16.09 feet; thence North 45 54'38"East, a distance of.9.97 feet; thence South 89 15'09"East, a distance of 109.27 feet to the Westerly right-of-way of Rainier Avenue North and North 11 44' 57"West 52.73 feet of the Point of Beginning. N TOGETHER WITH: B ginning at Point"A"; thence South 84 06'05"West 20.36 feet to the o e d of this description. ev Beginning at Point"B"; thence South 82 02'03" West 20.22 feet to the CN.' end of this description. o Beginning at Point"C'; thence South 82 02'03" West 21.34.feet to the o •end of this description. CN Beginning at Point"D"; thence Nortli 0 14'59"East: 1,,4.71 ft to theeAAt VLS end of this description. a�g ' 4.4 • • `h4**+ ��I�L ill IC(� E1+C*,R,�S arp� j.8ov1 i% H:WORMSUCCRECORDIEASEMENT.DOC' Page 4 FORM 03 0000/bWCA2.21-97 Map Exhibit (Must be stamped by a P.E.or L.S.) • '4 - '- ti: 11 1^ _rierii- ii...4.70:ipt 1---pir rIL ) 1Pi"• la 21 7170W. 8 1 I2 • ilI - '{1i9• 0' II $2 MIS16 1II 10 :II' �Ff019 1 1 '�.e_t, _t.�JPJ . • 11r ' 11 to - - 7[O�S.IIm _ �� 4t 4 r r`ti 'I' • .r -r . ..a .I t ,'i\ l. L ' it_.I!• !- f :74 ' 1 20 n la 11 `�'rjV1 Is 16 n i I. 90 t I LIJ °, r 9 1 11 13 14 IS 161 11I3•I2 II• J0 6' Q .t_ •• 1 I _ • s.s I-s &L_. tltlp_ \ h VACATEOS.(119 Si) VACI1TE0 b. c•.; , 7-r-1 r e-r3 C Tnr"—r". 33ii-1.1_4___• ® 1 • , 96l 1 `" '). • ' � �- 1 24 7l 7 71 10 19 18 I1 S MI6 I 1 la 11 ifft-- R� G ''~CD j , 9`Ia' I 1 13 14 IS 161 ';IS 14 I3 n I 1! f. Ql -t.s.:. . s_ 42V.1 4' Uf ..1....: .a....t.. 31 ..,..—kV——.... c+ r.__ _•iltYAC ' ED S. 120 S'C• VACArj. G' �V+•�/T�, 7 Ott RUOY J SIARKOVIGII ‘I 1�, 5ACre.s " ss I.ItAc r.Ia ok._ _l..rs.34. .4r.1�_�,...�`��_�_�r=T __- _ ..___. 1 1 1, ' RUDY J^S111RKOVICII 2014 LBO At,. �(. �1 J rIJ II! 7.•I 2. • A 4t ,,,,„ e.. .i.v,ii& , { l .% , '-%,...$\ . 20734 ",.-,.,. i: 491.E 0 , 0, ,000,, 1\N.L 1 i'• . 11:1FORMS\KCRECORD\EASEMENT.DOC1 Page 5 FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 r: L 519---9✓o - 03e • • Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way . Renton,WA 11111111111111111111 20000202000124 PAGE 001 OF 002 • 02/02/2000 09:24 KING COUNTY, WA CITY OF RENTON BS 9.00 BILL OF SALE Property Tax Parcel Number: I I g oOo— 3070 Project File#: Street Intersection:RErgrbm CRowt.t Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Rent on Crown LLC 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation The Grantor,as named above,for,and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to • o the Grantee,as named above,the following described personal property now located at: `�' 801 Rainier Avenue, Renton WA 98055 o in the City of Renton,County of King and State of Washington,to-wit: c , /\PPRox. I IDS -Fermi- of en cluc f. lrorl 'wote r mo,.w CLI°Y13w t-1k1 4 .. tre h ydro-61-s , rn'noel Le- eons wo:#72r o M cx \cb b 0.4) r+esn oon Gen' . By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawflrlly claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, administrators and essig forever. . IN WITNESS OF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. • • • • • • Notary Seal must be within box INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged It to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument • Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: • Dated: • oou- v4-2,95 H:IFORMSIKCRECORDIBOS.DOC1bh Page I K" Corporate Form lof Acknowledgment State of Washington County of Ki h, ' On this 22. day of '41y , 19 _c ,before me personally appeared H on& S. ?4.7 to me known to b;e M ck.,, 9 ,. Member- of the corporation that Iexecuted the within instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioneFl, and each on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. \\\11 UItIttlll/l////// ��RE JpN�ii�� Notary Public in and for the State of Washington �� *▪ cs\ON-c'A;S' i� Notary (Print) Shev-ec_- hones a**TAR My appointment expires .3 d1 I$i 2co2- cp ��• JBUUC CV V '• Y 18 �''•''� o //4//m l Ulllll„u\��, b4,.„,‘..-- �J I . 0 N it DEVELOPMENT PLANNING RENTON CROWN, LLC Cam'OF RENTON 1200 S. 192nd St.-#300,Seattle,WA 98148 �Q� O Office:206-241-6241 Fax:206-246-8154 5 1998 RE ,EivED Monday,May 04, 1998 . Mark Piewel City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Dear Mark, Per our conversation last week, I am submitting for your files a list of the Renton Crown Apartment buildings' exterior color changes. Also, enclosed are the color schemes for the pool and spa areas for your records. If you have any questions regarding these color changes,please call me at 206-241-6241. Thank you. BUILDINGS 1. Siding Color: Clay(Shown in picture submitted) 2. Shingle Color: Natural Clay 3. Trim Color: White 4. Roof Color: Driftwood gray 5. Door Color: White 6. Accent Color(Signs):Royal Blue/White/Taupe POOL AREA 1. Fencing color: White 2. Pool coping color: Gray 3. Pool&spa tile: Royal Blue 4. Pool furniture: Taupe&Navy w/linen market umbrellas in navy/taupe pinstripes. 5. Spa room shower: Taupe w/one row of navy blue tile @ eye level. c ely, hann Tan .I'roject Manager October 27, 1997 Renton City Council Minutes Page 349 Fire: Training Simulators Fire Department requested authorization to use $610,000 in Fire Mitigation Purchase with Fire Funds for the purchase of three firefighter training simulators for Fire Station Mitigation Funds #14's fire training burn building. Refer to Public Safety Committee. Plat: Honey Creek Hearing Examiner recommended approval, with conditions, of the Honey Heights, Preliminary, 2600 Creek Heights Preliminary Plat; 19 single family lots on a 3.03 acre parcel in Block of NE 25th St (PP- the 2600 block of NE 25th Street (PP-97-036). Council concur. 97-036) MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED TO REMOVE ITEM 9.a. FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION. CARRIED. Separate Consideration Executive Department recommended approval of an ordinance repealing the Item 9.a. Burnstead Annexation ordinance (Ord. No. 4554, adopted 11/06/95). Annexation: Burnstead, Repeal of Ord. No. 4554 Responding to Councilman Edwards, City Attorney Warren explained that although the annexation ordinance never took formal effect, it is being repealed because Council did, in fact, adopt it. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE REPEALING THE BURNSTEAD ANNEXATION ORDINANCE. CARRIED. (See page 350 for ordinance.) OLD BUSINESS Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Corman presented a report Transportation (Aviation) regarding the transportation concurrency regulations. The Committee met on Committeee October 21, 1997, to discuss the proposed transportation concurrency regulations which will implement the Transportation Element of Renton's Comprehensive Plan. The Committee concurred with the proposed transportation concurrency regulations as presented by staff, and recommended that the regulations be forwarded to the State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development for a required 60-day review period. This item shall remain in Committee pending State review. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending approval Finance: Vouchers of Claims Vouchers #152314 - 152771; three wire transfers in the total amount of $1,728,776.15; approval of Payroll Vouchers #156003 - 156275; and 489 direct deposits in the total amount of $1,200,989.40. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Clawson presented a report recommending Utilities: Bryn Mawr concurrence in staffs recommendation that the boundary between the City of Sewer Service to Renton Renton and the Bryn Mawr/Lakeridge Water and Sewer District be revised to Crown Development, allow the District to provide sanitary sewer service to the development known CAG-97- as Renton Crown. The Committee recommended that Council authorize the SA _ Mayor and City Clerk to execute the interlocal agreement for the service boundary revision. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 350 for resolution.) ORDINANCES AND The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL' UTILITIES COMMITTEE _ _ 7 COMMITTEE REPORT• Date -October 27, 1997 Interlocal Agreement Between Renton and Bryn Mawr/Lakeridge Water and Sewer District (Referred October 13,.1997) • .. The Utilities Committee concurs in Staffs recommendation that the boundary between the City and the District be revised to allow the District to provide sanitary sewer service to the development known as Renton Crown. The Committee recommends that the Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Interlocal. Agreement for the service boundary.revision. The Committee further recommends that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. , E0 4 4 x Dan Clawson, hair Toni Nelson,Vice C air • • Timothy J. Sch ' ember ca Ron Olsen.• Dave Christensen ;> Document2\ - - , J - October 27, 1997 Renton City Council Minutes Page 350 Resolution #3290 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Utilities: Bryn Mawr interlocal cooperative agreement with the Bryn Mawr/Lakeridge Water and Sewer Service to Renton Sewer District for the servicing of that apartment complex being developed as Crown Development, Renton Crown Apartments. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY CAG-97- NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. 1 , The following ordinance was presented for first referred and referred to the Council meeting of 11/03/97 for second and final reading: Annexation: Burnstead, An ordinance was read repealing Ordinance No. 4554 (Burnstead Annexation, Repeal of Ord. No. 4554 File No. A-94-001). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 11/03/97. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading: Ordinance #4684 An ordinance was read annexing approximately three acres located in the Annexation: Hoffman, Sierra Heights area, west of Queen Ave. NE, extended, and north of NE 19th Queen Ave NE/NE 19th St., extended (Hoffman Annexation; A-97-001). MOVED BY KEOLKER- St WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. Ordinance #4685 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification of approximately Annexation: Hoffmann, three acres located in the Sierra Heights area, west of Queen Ave. NE, Zoning extended, and north of NE 19th St., extended, to Residential - eight dwelling units per acre (R-8; Hoffman Annexation). MOVED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. Ordinance #4686 An ordinance was read amending subsections 6-10-1.E and 6-10-1.K of Legal: Rented or Leased Chapter 10, Criminal Code; amending Section 6-14-22; and adding a new Property Theft and State section to Chapter 14, Litter, of Title VI (Police Regulations) of City Code Litter Law Adoption relating to the adoption by reference of miscellaneous state crimes. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR 60 MINUTES TO DISCUSS PROPERTY ACQUISITION. Time: 8:37 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:40 p.m.; roll was called; all Councilmembers present. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 9:41 p.m. BRENDA FRITSV LD, Deputy City Clerk Recorder: Brenda Fritsvold 10/27/97 October 13, 1997 Renton City Council Minutes Page 330 City Clerk: Quarterly City Clerk submitted Quarterly Contract List for July 1 to September 30, Contract List, 7/97 to 1997; 51 contracts executed totaling $5,070,979.57. Information. 9/97 City Clerk: 1997 Primary City Clerk submitted Certification and Official Canvass of 1997 Primary Election Certification and Election results, as follows: Council Position No. 6 - Chris Clifford (1,666, Official Canvass nominated); Charles W. Doyle (763); Tim Schlitzer (1,990, nominated). Information. Finance: Assistant Finance Finance and Information Services Department requested permission to hire the Director Step Change Assistant Finance Director at Step D rather than Step C of the salary range. Refer to Finance Committee. (See page 331 for Finance Committee report.) Legal: Rented or Leased Legal Department recommended adoption of ordinance prohibiting theft of Property Theft and State rental, leased, or lease-purchased property, repealing the section addressing Litter Law Adoption failure to deliver leased personal property, and adopting the State litter law. Refer to Public Safety Committee. Vacation: Lake Ave S Planning and Technical Services Division recommended approval of the (Safeway/VAC-95-001) request from Richard Wagner, Baylis Brand Wagner, 10801 Main St., Bellevue, 98004, to extend the matter of the Lake Ave. S. street vacation (VAC-95-001) to April 6, 1998, to allow time for resolution of issues related to the contamination of this site. Council concur. CAG: 97-057, 1997 Street Transportation Division submitted CAG-97-057, 1997 Street Overlay project; Overlay Project, MA and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in Segale the amount of $27,296.82, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $19,494.79 to M.A. Segale, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Utilities: Renton Crown Utility Systems Division submitted proposed interlocal agreement with the Development Sanitary Bryn Mawr/Lakeridge Water and Sewer District for the provision of sanitary Sewer Service (800 Rainier sewer service to the Renton Crown development, located in the 800 block of Ave S), Agreement Rainier Ave. S. Refer to Utilities Committee. w/Bryn Mawr/Lakeridge MOVED BY BY S1' 1(1-U 0ri COUNCIL A PROVES HE CONS NT AGENDADAS PRESENTED.T CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report Community Services recommending concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Rosemary Committee Quesenberry to the Planning Commission, to complete the unexpired term of Appointment: Planning Kenneth Cameron, who resigned (term to expire June 30, 1998). The Commission Commission also recommended concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Rose Anne Jacobs to the Planning Commission, to complete the unexpired term of George F. Mehrens, who resigned (term to expire January 31, 2000). MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation (Aviation) Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Corman presented a report Committeee regarding the proposal from the Downtown Renton Association (DRA) EDNSP: DRA Lease for regarding parking in the downtown. The DRA requested permission to lease Employee Parking at S 4th City-owned property at the corner of 4th and Burnett for downtown employee St & Burnett Ave S parking. The Association also recommended changing the parking spaces on (LAG-), Increase Parking Third Ave. from one to two hour parking and adding "Customer Parking on 3rd Ave S from One to Only" to the signage, and that the City explore the concept of a program of Two Hours tiered parking fines for repeat parking offenders. Outstanding issues include parking enforcement, insurance/liability, lighting, change in parking time restrictions on Third, and two other DRA suggestions. t(.OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA . AI #: (pj . • Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: October 13, 1997 Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division Staff Contact Dave Christensen Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing... Correspondence..: Interlocal Agreement Between Renton and Bryn Mawr/Lakeridge Ordinance Water and Sewer District Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: , New Business Study Sessions Issue Paper Information Draft Resolution Draft Agreement Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept X Refer to Utilities Committee of October 21, 1997. Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... -0- Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted -0- Revenue Generated Total Project Budget -0- City Share Total Project.. Summary of Action: The City has negotiated with the Bryn Mawr/Lakeridge Water and Sewer District (District) the provision of sanitary sewer service to a development known as Renton Crown located in the 800 block of Rainier Avenue N. This development currently lies within the City's sewer service area, but would require the developer to install a sewage lift station and approximately 500 linear feet of force main. The District has existing facilities directly available for connection by gravity to provide service. As such, staff is recommending that we amend our service boundaries with the District to allow them to provide sanitary sewer service to this development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: • The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that the boundary between the City and the District be revised to allow the District to provide sanitary sewer service to the development known as Renton Crown. Staff further recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Interlocal Agreement for the service boundary revision. h:\does\97-888.DOC\DMC\ps CITY OF RENTON • PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 30, 1997 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler,President ®G City Council Members VIA: /�( Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator Cr a Planning/Building/Public Works Department STAFF CONTACT: Dave Christensen x-6212 SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement Between Renton and Bryn Mawr/Lakeridge Water and Sewer District ISSUE: The developer of the project known as the Renton Crown Apartments, located in the 800 block of Rainier Av N., is currently in for permitting with the City. The property is within the City's sewer service area, but the City cannot conveniently provide service to this parcel. Bryn Mawr/Lakeridge Water and Sewer District(District)has existing facilities directly available to serve this proposed development. RECOMMENDATION: • It is the recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department to modify our service boundaries with the District to allow the District to provide service to this development through approval of an interlocal agreement. • Staff further recommends that a resolution be passed authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the interlocal agreement that allows for the boundary adjustment. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The City and the District currently have boundary agreements in place that delineate service area. The parcels that comprise the proposed development of the Renton Crown Apartments currently lie within the City's existing sanitary sewer service area. In order for the City to be able to provide service to this development would require the developer to install a sewage lift station and approximately 500 linear feet of sewer force main to connect to the existing City system. By contrast,the District has existing sanitary sewer mains directly available for this development to connect to by gravity. The provision of service by the District not only will save the development significant funds, but also helps to protect the City in the potential event that regulations are changed that require the City to be responsible for the maintenance and operation of lift stations that are currently installed privately to serve individual developments. CONCLUSION: The transfer of sanitary sewer service from the City to the District would be beneficial to,both the City and the Developer as well as to the District. The City would not have to be concerned with future ownership of a private lift station, the developer would decrease his costs associated with providing service to the parcel, and the District will gain a new sewer customer. As such, we recommend that Council approve of the staff request. hAdocs\97-889.DOC\DMC1ps 09/16/1997 15:22 772-7311 BMLASD PAGE 02 • AGREEMENT FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE • THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of , 1997, by and between Bryn Mawr-Lukeridge Water and Sewer District, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington ("the District"), the City of Renton, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington ("the City") and Renton Crown, LLC, Inc„ a Washington corporation ("Renton Crown"). RECITALS A. Renton Crown has applied to the City for construction of a 112 unit apartment complex on certain real property Iocated north of South 121st Street and west of Rainier Avenue South, Renton, Washington, which property is contiguous to the District ("Property"). B. The City cannot conveniently serve the Property with its sanitary sewer system. C. Renton Crown has entered into a developer extension agreement with the District to construct sewer facilities to serve the Property and to convey such facilities to the District ("Developer Agreement"). D. The District is willing to allow connection of the sewer facilities to the District's sanitary sewer system and to serve the Property with sanitary sewer service. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: • • 1. Property to Served. After Renton Crown conveys sewer facilities to the District pursuant to the Developer Agreement, the District shall provide sewer service to the real property described in Exhibit A and depicted on Exhibit B, both of which are attached hereto and by.this reference made a part hereof ("Property"). The City consents to construction of the sewer facilities pursuant to the Developer Agreement and to delivery of sewer service to the Property by the District. No other real property shall be served by the sewer facilities constructed by Renton Crown pursuant to the Developer Agreement without the written consent of the District and the City. 2. Applicable Rules. The sewer service provided by the District to the Property shall be subject to all District resolutions, standards, rules and regulations, as now in effect and as1may be amended in the future. In the event of delinquency in the payment of any rates, chargs or assessments imposed by the District, the entire Property shall be subject to applicable sewea lien statutes and District resolutions. The sewer service shall be provided on the same terms! and conditions as provided generally to similar buildings and properties in the District. 3. ..Additional Remedies: In addition to rights granted by statutes and District resolutions, the District shall have the right to disconnect private sewer lines located on the Property from the District sanitary sewer system in the event of failure to pay any rates, charges D005111320100110142965.01 09/16/97 - 1 - 09/16/1997 15:22 772-7311 EMLW&SD PAGE 03 or assessments imposed by the District. Upon such disconnection, all rates, charges and assessments paid by Renton Crown to the District pursuant to the Developer Agreement shall be forfeited, and upon reconnection, if approved by the District, Renton Crown shall pay all applicable connection charges and assessments due.and payable at the time of reconnection, with no credit for charges or assessments previously paid. 4, Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and assigns, and shall he a covenant running with the land. 5. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including the exhibits, contains all of the • covenants, promises, agreements and conditions, either oral or written, between the parties. BRYN MAWR-LAKERIDGE WATER CITY OF RF.NTON, WASHINGTON AND SEWER DISTRICT By By President, Board of Commissioners Mayor • RENTON CROWN, LLC, INC. • • By Its • • • • • • • • • DOCS111320100110142965.01 09/16/97 - 2 . . 09/04/1997 11:12 772-7311 • 13MLMNibll r'=,ot 134 � -Li , 12 � S . .. aK 19 8 Il '7 i •. •� • • 10 ihe • EXHIBIT fi ...._. '., \ 1d b L61:"...i\ Z �a �is, '-tf O •• 61' • 3,( • , ' . - .� If:- ' . • 19 NW • = -�•:` 1 • '//. TN, ' ST, (S4 i . 1V- ...'• • _ • h• 6 zi 1 I4 _ 2 3 q mil0q �: a7a. ,� V. i3 !l '• . 8 • 1 •T'=.'6. W m'� 19 _ _ .44L�E /E • •,• 1 _ n E. ., 20 _ • , -6-0 t+ _ ? _ '3?'28 jtd: i , 3 N qp`— - F� �� • • 05.s t i� Facili'7��irlrs • .�.. ' \ s�v;�e j s� 9 Yam, .} 1 • ��r 8 • 1T ..._ in . 6� +� _ 3 ZZ 21 10 19 a � Se�y¢r District Bndr[f. ,•.fit IS • •ts- � s R. 13 Ja i wpm \, • • 14 :I O r 7 6 •• , :• \ CP s ii • • !9 lb s24 23 21 ZIIII l2 ' ;; 1._. . . 4 .,,,:; 19 .. . 5 issillitz.,,, 11/1131111111t4: . .z4 2ZZ.. ... -NI f - ;f \ N L roeor�d ''• r8g'- 8 S• ir 2.34 ill11191Pliffill61111114krAllgr. '411°-11' u 21— • �- 7 • �� I 1• 7 -4 ' 11 • (V /� WA/ . � ` • . , i, . I► R n \ • \s. •1 • ti - Z :10;rdffil . A Or, • I \ , 0 •N •. ie- . _._...__ ., It . \ 22 ! 7 ��I , �I `� _ rd ght st 23 8•, ri-Ya �d Mir 5 '� $ • • . • 16 — G.t. 7 _�----'� 16 • \ _-_-__„-_-- 110 ?A iI ._. _ '. ..�.---- 1 1 . .•CCTG u: C1Lp o3S4sa i> 1iing thigiliitrKONQ 9419 204 PLACE • K ,NT,IA 98031 • (200850-0934 - P'AX 727-5320 September 12, 1997 Mark Pywell, Planning Dept. City of Renton Municipal Building 200 MiII Ave. So. Renton, Wa. 98055 RE: Renton Crown Apartments Filling Beyond the N.G.P.E. Line Mark: Consistent with our discussion at the site last Thursday, I am submitting this letter as a request for the City to allow grading west of the established native growth protection easement line. As you know, we are proposing to place additional fill against the existing bank with hopes of providing enhanced stabilization of that bank. You saw some areas where strict adherence to the NGPE line would cause detrimental "depressions" between the fill and the side the slope. We also pointed out a tree that would be advisable to remove. As stated during our meeting, any grading beyond the NGPE line would be limited to fill only. We are being extremely careful not to excavate into the side of the slope at any location. Attached to this letter is a letter from our geotechnical engineer, Earth Consultants. This letter reiterates the benefits from this fill and further details Its placement procedures and Its monitoring. We will also be installing the groundwater drainage measures that we discussed onsite. Thank you for meeting with us onsite and considering our request. Sincerely, 9,0uNpm.)9 9.0SULea) James J. Jaeger, P.E. FP : 3 pp,GEs RECEIVED SEP 15 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON ..SEF-11-97 THU 4: 14 PM F-1 CONSULTANTS, INC. FAX NO. '"e 746 0660 • P. 2 1 4- - ' �� P•1`}'e ( .��► �� Earth Consultants Inc. l,�r Owt, hrurxl CWJ4ums&111vuM r rlTlf111 41f lwlr. • September 11, 1997 E-7188 SIC Corporation 1200 South 192nd Street, Ste 300 Seattle, WA 98148 Attn: Mark H. Lundberg Dear Mark: An on-site meeting was held on September 10, 1997 with Mark Pywell of the City of Renton Planning Department. along with Jim Jaeger, Don Hansen. Continental Dirt, and you. The purpose of our meeting was to discuss the elope on the west aide of the site. This slope has been subjected to past slides as evidenced by the rock-filled elope, plastic on the soil, and the plastic drain pipe hanging down over the slope. Theme slides occurred on the adjacent residential properties. First,these drain pipes should be connected to the storm drain line that will be installed along the toe of the slope. They should not be allowed to free flow over the surface onto the Renton Crown property. We also have some concern about the stability of these slopes. it is our recommendation fill be placed up against the toe of the slope to act as a buttress. We understand this fill will extend into the native growth protection area, but It Is our opinion the enhancement of the stability of the slope is critical. The areas to be filled should be cleared of all vegetation end debris. There are ■ couple of trees near the toe of the slope that have been partially undercut; these trees should be cut clown but the stumps allowed to remain in place. At the toe of the elope, a minimum ten foot wide key should be extended into competent ground, and then backfiiled. The buttress fill should then be pieced at e 2H:1 V slope end benched into the native slOpe 8s the fill is being . placed. The fill should be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum density es determined by the standard proctor method. • 1805-136th Raw N E.,Suite 201,Bellevue,Wtehington 98006 Belevue(206)843-3780 Seattle(206)464-1584 FAX(208)74-0X60 Tacoma(208)272.6606 - A SEP-11-97 'NU 4: 14 PM r'0TH CONSULTANTS, INC.. FAX NO. °"c 746 G860 P. 3 1 - -- 5TC Corporation E-7188 September 11. 1997 Page 2 Where the fill slope intersects the existing slope,a swats and subsurface drainage ditch should be constructed to intercept any surface and groundwater flowing off the hillside. A toe drain will also be required at the bottom of the key. All grading recommendations presented In the referenced soils report should be followed regarding placement of this till. Upon completion of the fill, the elope should be vegetated with a quick-growing grass or covered with plastic until the area can be hydroseeded. Ail tha drain pipes coming off the hill should be connected to the storm drain system by means of catch basins or whatever other method is feasible. The placement of the buttress fill should be tested and monitored by a representative of Earth Consultants, Inc. It has been a pleasure to continue providing our services to you on this project. Please call if you have any further questions. Respectfully submitted, EARTH ••' SULTANTI, iNC. • / . Levinson, P.E. 193LAml cc: City of Renton, Mark Pywell Continental Dirt, Jerry McCann Jim Jaeger Forth C.n.t+ .. tie CITI 3F RENTON • Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 17, 1997 Mr. James Jaeger P.E Jaeger Engineering 9419 S. 204th Place Kent, WA 98031 Subject: Renton Crown Apartment LUA-96-038,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Jaeger: I have reviewed your letter, dated September 12, 1997, the letter from Robert Levinson P.E. of Earth Consultants, and made a field visit to the site. The work you have requested to perform will constitute less than 10% change to the approved site plan and can be considered enhancement work on the steep slope area of the site that is covered by the Native Growth Protection Easement. Therefore, the work can proceed subject to inspection by the Public Works inspector. I will need to receive a copy of a landscape plan that address the area to be disturbed by this grading work. This plan will need to identify the location, name, and size of the plant materials to be used in this area. Preferably the planting will include a combination of groundcover and shrubs that will discourage children from playing on these sensitive slopes. This plan should be submitted as soon as possible and all grading and enhancement activities will need to be completed prior to requesting final inspection on any buildings. If you have any questions regarding these issues, please contact me at 277-5586. Sincerely, * IC Project ager 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer qr_1(\ r,Mq11111 v ' „ „ 9.40g 1.264 IPLA G KENT.via 310030'. - (200 050.6634 . rah{D-27..s32® September 12, 997;. -DEVELOPMENT PLANNING_ CITY OF RENTON Mark Pywell, Plenning;Dept.' P 1 7 City of"Renton . Municipal Buildi g 'ZOO Mill.,Ave So . Renton; Wa; ;9°055 : RE: Renton Brown Apartments •, Filling Be and.the.N.G.P:E. Line Mark: ' Consistent with our discussion at the,site.last Thursday, I-am submitting this, ,letter,as a requ 7st for the City to allow grading west of the established: • nativegrowth •rotection easement line. As you know, we are proposing ,... to pllace'additioonal fill against.the existing bank with hopes of providing ,. . enhancedsta.i,lization of'that bank.. you saw some areas where strict adherence to.ti"e.NGPEline would .cause.detrimental ``depressions , between the til and the side.the' slope We.also"pointed 'out.a tree that . ' would.be advise ble to remove. As stated during our meeting, .any ,grading beyone 'the NGPE line would Pe limited to fill only.;-We are-being ,' ' extremely care ul not;to'excavate into the'side,of,the-slope at any location. Attached to thi: letter is a letter from our geotechnical engineer,,Earth Consultants. T is letter:reiterates the benefits.from this fill and further • details its plac-ment:procedures and its monitoring: :We will also be installing'the gr•undwaterdrainage measures that we`discussed'.onsite: . Thank you for ,'eeting with•us'onsite and considering'our request _ Sincere,ly," _ James J'. Jaeg_r;'P.E: -:eP-1i-y1 THU 4: 14 FM EARTH CONSULTANTS, 1NC, FAX NO, ZUb 746 UUbU R. — tk I t1• 3 Earth Consultants Inc. .9 Gc:otrx.hnu•.0 l:nginrx:1!:.onolkgtsf.;&t•.n}n x,r,rc ntnl (h- Ii ry • September 11, 1997 E-71 86 STC Corporation 1200 South 192nd Street, Ste 300 Seattle, WA 98148 Attn: Mark H. LUndberg Dear Mark: An on-site meeting was held on September 10, 1997 with Mark Pywell of the City of Renton Planning Department, along with Jim Jaeger, Don Hansen, Continental Dirt, and you. The purpose of our meeting was to discuss the slope on the west side of the site. This Slope has been subjected to pest slides as evidenced by the rock-filled slope, plastic on the soil, and the plastic drain pipe hanging down over the slope. These slides occurred on the adjacent residential properties. First, these drain pipes should be connected to the storm drain line that will be installed along the toe of the slope. They should not be allowed to free flow over the surface onto the Renton Crown property. We also have some concern about the stability of these slopes. It is our recommendation fill be placed up against the toe of the slope to act as a buttress. We understand this fill will extend into the native growth protection area, but it is our opinion the enhancement of the stability of the slope is critical. The areas to be tilled should -be cleared of all vegetation and debris. There are a couple of trees near the toe of the slope that have been partially undercut; these trees should be cut down but the stumps allowed to remain in place. At the toe of the slope, a minimum ten foot wide key should be extended into competent ground, and then backfiiled. The buttress till should then be placed et a 2H:1V Slope and benched into the native slope es the fill is being placed. The fill should be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum density as determined by the standard proctor method. -M _ 1605-I36th Place N.E.,Suite 201,Bellevue,Washington 98005 Bellevue(206)643.3780 Seattle(206)464-1584 FAX(206)74-608-60 Tacoma(206)272-6608 SEP-11-97 THU 4: 14 FM EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC, FAX NO, 206 746 0860 F', - • 1'00_14_ PyLve - STC Corporation E-7186 September 11, 1997 Page 2 Where the fill slope intersects the existing slope, a swele and subsurface drainage ditch should be constructed to intercept any surface and groundwater flowing off the hillside. A toe drain will also be required at the bottom of the key. All grading recommendations presented in the referenced soils report should be followed regarding placement of this fill. Upon completion of the fill, the slope should be vegetated with a quick-growing grass or covered with plastic until the area can be hydroseeded. All the drain pipes coming off the hill should be connected to the storm drain system by means of catch basins or whatever other method is feasible. The placement of the buttress fill should be tested and monitored by a representative of Earth Consultants, Inc. It has been a pleasure to continue providing our services to you on this project. Please call if you have any further questions. Respectfully submitted, EARTH SULTANTS, INC. S. Levinson, P.E. Principal RSL/kmI cc: City of Renton, Mark Pywell Continental Dirt; Jerry McCann Jim Jaeger • Earth Conauttlnts, Inc. • TO RE AUG 8 .1997 BUILDING DIVISION • • NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT This agreement made this is` day of July, 1997 between Renton Crown, LLC (GRANTOR), owner in fee of that certain parcel of land described in Exhibit"A", and the City of Renton, WITNESSETH That the GRANTOR does hereby designate a specific portion of that property described in Exhibit "A" as a Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE). Said portion is more specifically described in Exhibit "B". Said NGPE includes steep slope sensitive areas and shall include the following attached restrictions: • tiO 414 Designation of a Native Growth Protection Easement acknowledges a n beneficial public interest in the land within the easement. This interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the public health, fl safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, visual and aural buffering, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The NGPE imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the land subject to the easement the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by the City of Renton, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the easement. The vegetation within the easement may not be cut, pruned, removed or damaged without express permission from the City of Renton, which permission must be obtained in writing from the City of Renton Dept. of Public Works. IN Wit SS WHEREOF,the said GRANTOR has hereunto signed his name. 411 67 • S. an Manager STATE OF WASHINGTON, } • }ss ' County of King } ' On this ?'day of t 19 9 3- before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and fo tate of Washington,duly . . commissioned and sworn,personally appeared tiv viaqL S . Tam to .• me known to be the individual described in and who exedted the within anti . • foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he_ signed the same as h).S free and voluntary act and deed,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. • Witness my hand an official,seal hereto affixed the day and year first above _ • written. 1,1 , • • Vt.G�Ort&. tlM4^ , � •(-o.• • to Lk fn ., # Notary Public in and for the State N , j •• , , ± of Washingto ,residing at .$e t 6. &4- . rgio R.P. ' COM !SSION�EXPIRES 5-/9--`dl • . • • • • Ext-1 BIT P. PAc e .t oP 3 • PARCE1. "A" • That portion of Blocks 36 dad 39 of Bryn Neir Addition as tiled in Volume 5 of plAto , pegs 5;8 , records of King County , Wnahington, end of thce vacated streets and aIle�i n4jolning, QDdescribed an folrows: QD Beginning at the northeast, corner of Lot 9 mock 36, of said V4 Pint; thence 402 00 53 V along the test line of said Lot 9 a distance of 50.00 feed to the Northwest .corner of Lot. 7 of sold Block 36; thence S87°07'01"r along the North line of sold Lot 7 and along its Neeterly extenelon, d distance of 1,+5 feet, more CD or tess,to the Westerly margin of Rainier. Avenue; thence r Southeitsterly Along Wad Westerly margin 353 feet, more or less, to the South line of the hw 1/4 of Section 7, Township 23 North, • Range 5 East, W.M. , being that eatiteriine of eaceted South 120th Street; thincd WeAtAtrty along wild centerline 405 feat, more or Lees, ha the centerline of vacated 89th Avenue South; thence • NO2°00'53"W along said centerline 520 feet, more or lees, to the • centerline of. v*cated South 118th Street; thence S87 07'07"E nlong [geld 'centerline 150 feet more or less to the laortherly extInsion the East line of Lot �7, Block 36, of eatd Ptnt; thence SO2 00'g3"W ntong the Northerly extenei.on end along the East line of maid Lot 17 H distance, of 130 feet, more or. Less, to the Northwest cornet` of Lot 9 of saki Block; thence 587°07'07"E along said Horth litre jp.00 feet to the Northeast corner of nail Lot 9 and the point of.begint:ing. -• • • • EXH,1 d I .....__ Pt _.___—_PAGE 2 o F• PARCEL "0" . That portion of Blocks 35, 36, 39, and 40, of Bryn Mawr Addition ns Et1ed to Volume S of pasta, pn;;e 58, records or K1n�+, County. Washington, and of, the veented streets and nllnys nd)oining. described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 12, Slot* AO of said Pint; thence N87 07 07 W Along thn southerly boundary of Late 22, 23, dad 24, of Qel1d Bloch 40, and along their westarl extension, 98.00 feet to the centerline of the vacated alley adjoining glad Lot 24; thence N07.°00'53"L elong the centerline of said alley 100.00 feet to Ehte SQuthtetly merkin of vacated South 119th Street; thence northerly #does adtd Street 60.00 feet to the centerline of the vaested Alley Adjoining Lot 9 Block 35 of said lint; thence NO2°00'53"E tlloil said centerline 100.00 feet to the to the Westerly extension of the flotth line of Lot 9, Stock 35 of said plat; thence 887907'07"E Along staid Westerly extension and along the Uofeth Line of Lots 9,10, II And 12 of enId Block 128.00 eel feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 20, block 35, of acid plft; thence 1102°00'53"S slang the West line of sell Lot 20 and along its Northerly itictensiott 130.00 leek to the centerline of vacated 04 South 118th St!•est; thence S87' 07'07"E elong the centerline of vnonted.South 118th Street 150.00 feet to the centerline of ve{ndtdd 89th Avenee 8otfth; thence S02 00' 53"W elong slid centerline 520.0U eetl more or less, to the Sotith line of the NW 1/4 of Section 7, ToWnship 23 Notth, ltdnge 5 Fnst,...W.lt. , being the centerline ' of vieeted botiEh •120th 8tteet; thence Westterly ' along said tentetlitte 180 feet, (moth or Leas, to the southerly extension of the W#It lihd of tot 12 Block 40 of said plat; • thence Northerly eloti8 the Southerly extension And alone the West line of said Lot 12 8 diet/Ince of 130 teat, more or less, to the • point of beginning. Exi-t 1 B L1 A PIrGE. 3 o P s PARCEL "D" • • 'Chat "portion of Blocks 30, 35 end 36, of Bryn I1nwc Addition en filed in Volume- 5 of pints, page 58, records or Ri•l comity, Wnshittgton, and gf. the vecnted streets and alley. described tis follows: ' .D • Beginning nt the northeast corner of I,ot 9 Block 36, of solrl - Flat;. thence 802 00 53 W _dlortg the East tine of enid Lot 9 a . . Voil distnnce of 50.00 l:eet to the Northwest corner of Lot 7 ni. slid Cr) Block 36; thence 987°07'07"E Along the North line of said Lot 7nnd nlong its WeeEetiy extension n • distance of 145 feet, more of lesa,to the Westerly margin of Rainier Avenue; thence NotEhweetecty along said Wenferly metgin D. 180 feet, more or tete, to the centerline of vacated South 118th Street; thence We ter y along enid centerline 136 feat, more or lees to the fotthar y txteteel.on of the Viet line of Lot: 17 , Block 36., of edict• 011E1 thence Southerly Along extension i and along the Eeat litte of said Lot. 17 n distnnee of f 130 leek,thence or Northwest corner 30.00rfeetoto the d Block; kheace A87 07 0 8 • • NorthettsE corner of mild Lot 9 IttId the pol.nt of beginning. TOGETHER 111TIl Lott 13, iA, 15, and 16, Block 30, of enid Plat. and together with Ehat portion of the West half of Vacated 89th Avenue South adjoining sBtd Lots on the Emit, nod -together with the North 1 aAi6 f Soedhehnd tot on 118EI South treet adjoning snld vacated 89t TOGETi1!1t WITl1 Loth 21, 22, 23, and 2". of block 35 of avid pint and together With the Eeat halt of vacated 4tLey adjoining Lot 21� on the West and the South httlf of vnented South 118th Street edJointtig said Ldta on the North. - ' a • • EXHIBIT B NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION f-4 03 That portion of Blocks 30, 35, 39 and 40, of Bryn Mawr Addition as filed in Volume 5 of plats, page 58, records of King County, Washington, and of the vacated streets and alleys adjoining; situated northwest, west, southwest and south of the easement line described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 13, Block 30 of said plat; thence S 87'07' 07" E, along the north line of Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16 and along their easterly extension 150.00 ft. to the centerline of vacated 89th Ave. S.; thence S 02'00' 00"W, along said centerline 35.00 ft. to the True Point of Beginning. Thence S 50'00' 00" W, 200.00 ft. Thence S 40'00' 00" W, 145.00 ft. Thence due south, 120.00 ft. Thence S 32'00' 00" E, 232.00 ft. Thence due east, 508.00 ft. more or less to the west right-of- way line of Rainier Ave. S.,the end of said easement line. „. CIZ _” OF RENTON ar&L. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 15, 1996 Mr. Steve Leitzke The Leitzke Architects 6102 142nd Ave. SE Bellevue, WA 98006 Subject: Renton Crown Apartments Dear Mr. Leitzke: We have reviewed your letter, dated August 12, 1996, and the revised site plan, marked revision 1. The proposed revisions are considered to be minor and consistent with the revision discussed before the Hearing Examiner during the public hearing process. The revision to the site plan are approved. The revisions include the relocation of the entrance to the north and the subsequent relocation of Building A to the south, the construction of an access roadway behind Buildings E, F, and G, and the raising of the base elevation of the site by approximately five feet. The height of the buildings will still be below that of the adjacent hills (approximately elevation 130). It is still the responsibility of the applicant to file a Notice of Proposed Construction with the FAA. • This administrative determination will be final unless a written appeal of this determination is filed with the City's Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the date of this decision. See Section 4-8-11 of the Renton Municipal Code for further information on the appeal process. Sincerely, Mark R. P I, AICP Project Manager • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer • At 1 2 1996 pp ��5577 °EVcLUrrn�N';• L�tDIL�KZ CITY OF Ate;ANNING gECHIITZCTS 6102 142ND AVE. 5.E. BELLEVUE,WA.98006 VOICE:206-747-0414 FAX/DATA:206-747-2083 PAGER:989-9375 August 12, 1996 Mark Pywell City of Renton Dear Mark : Attached are copies of the revised Crown Apartment site plan. The revisions include relocation of the driveway entrance to the North per the Hearing Examiners suggestion. The relocated entrance driveway benefits the site in the following ways: 1. The driveway entrance on the original plan would have required a variance for slope to 15 percent from the l'ublic Works department. The revised plan shows a driveway approach of less than 12 percent. 2. The addition of the loop road and the driveway has resulted in revisions to the grading plan. The amount of exported material is substantially reduced (+20000 cu. yds.) and the large retaining wall to the south of the parking areas for BLDGS C &G has been eliminated reducing the overall impacts to the earth and also impacts to traffic during construction. The access road loop has been added per the conditions of approval. However. crash gates for fire access have not been provided for the following reasons: 1. Having gone to the expense of constructing this roadway, the landowner is entitled to use this road for the benefit of the tenants and to allow alternative paths within the development. It will be stripped as a firelane. Crash gates also restrict access and are generally troublesome for the local fire departments. •` These plans are submitted for your review. We believe that these modifications are minor and are clue in part as a result of conditions and recommendations of the Hearing Examiner. 4irido eve eitzke, Architec Robert Levinson David Halinen Patricia Jarvis 1805- 136th Place NE,#201 10500 NE 8th,#1900 PO Box 1056 Bellevue, WA 98005 Bellevue, WA 98004 Renton, WA 9805 Wallace Morgan Carol Geiger Mike Meyer 11900- 87th Ave S 11914- 87th Ave S 8731 S 11th Place Seattle, WA 98178 Seattle, WA 98178 Seattle, WA 98178 Ethel Woodward Laura Baggett Chris Feldt 8816 South 122nd Street 11225- 84th Avenue South 11908-87th Avenue South Seattle, WA 98178 Seattle, WA 98178 Seattle, WA 9818 Tony Hoare Jim Spears 600 Market Place,#1 8735 South 117th Place 2003 Western Avenue Seattle, WA 9818 Seattle, WA 98121 1Y1aA-k ,)/mac 1I ;y ..,. CITY OF RENTON ``; Renton City Council Jesse Tanner,Mayor May 1, 1996 APPEAL FILED BY: David L. Halinen; Representative for Renton Crown Apartments L.L.C. RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision on June 6, 1996, File No. SA-96-038 To Parties of Record: The Planning and Development Committee will meet to review the subject appeal on: Wednesday, July 3, 1996 3:30 PM Council Chambers Second Floor Renton City Hall This is not a public hearing, but a working session of the Planning and Development Committee. As all Council committee meetings are open to the public, you are welcome to attend. Consideration of the appeal shall be based solely upon the written record previously established. Unless a showing can be made that additional evidence could not reasonably have been available at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. The Committee will submit a written recommendation to the full Council for their consideration at a regular Monday night Council meeting. If you have questions regarding this meeting, please phone the Council secretary at 235-2586. Sincerely, Kathy Keo er-Wheeler, Chair Planning and Development Committee PADCOMM.NOT 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2586 05/14/1996 10:24 2065474373 COMPLEAT COOK PAGE 01 CARLTON DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. i DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Ciro OF PENTON NAY 14194 May 13, 1996 RECEIVED Mr. Mark R. Pywell, AICP City of Renton Planning Department VIA FACSIMILE 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mark, Re. Renton Crown Apartments As discussed in our meeting today, we agree that there will have to be some additional planting on the sloped areas of the site which will be disturbed during the development of our project. It is our intention to leave as much of the native growth on the slopes as is at all possible, and would not only grass the disturbed areas, but also plant two or three dozen small fir trees and other species in general that are indigenous to our area. • Our concern is that the hillside be stabilized as well as be an attractive element of our development. Sincerely ,:, -y • Mark H. Lundberg President 704 N.E. Ncirthlake Way - Seattle, Waehington 98105 - (206) 547-4162 CITY OF RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE `'= MEMORANDUM `` z996' of%1;N DATE: 25-Sep-96 TO: Mark Pywell FROM: Lisa Stephens, ext. 25041-- SUBJECT: Recorded Documents Release of Covenants, Renton Crown Apartments, LLC 9609110682 The attached document has been recorded with King County, and is being returned to you. Please forward copies to parties of interest, and retain a copy for your file. Thank you. Enclosures r FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF: Office of the City Clerk City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RELEASE OF COVENANTS WHEREAS, by letter to the Renton City Council dated June 20, 1996, the attorney for the owners of the property to which the Covenants that are recorded under King County Recording Nos. 8710220434, 8710220435 and 8710220436 refer requested that the City expressly release those Covenants; and WHEREAS, the City Council's Planning and Development Committee duly considered the request for release and made a recommendation to the full Council that the Covenants be released; and • WHEREAS, during the regular meeting of the Renton City Council held on August 12, 1996, the Council directed the release of those Covenants. WHEREFORE, the City of Renton does hereby fully release the above-referenced Covenants 0 and render them of no further force or effect. d T SIGNED this " day of .o 0,0).,( , 1996. C6� CITY OF RENTON, a Washington municipal corporation 40, By. Jes a Tanner, Mayor ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: 15711Q10(Pt Brenda .Fritsvold, Deputy: City Clerk RELEASE OF COVENANTS--Page 1 of 2 I APPROVED AS TO FORM: Lawrence J. Warlen, City Attorney STATE OF WAS INGTON) )ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of S?e uei✓ , 1996, before nbeFper ovally appeared Jesse Tanner and ,Brenda Fritsvold, to me known to lbe the Mayor and,City Clerk of the City of Renton, the Washington municipal corporation described in and that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed a' of said municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereto set;my hand and affixed my official seal the day co and year first above written. f NOT-, RY PUB I in and for the :) State of Washington, residing at r si'`--' My commission expires: /O9 97 . RELEASE OF COVENANTS--Page 2 of 2 y L CITA JF RENTON N.7, Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 7, 1997 Mr. Jim Jaeger Jaeger Engineering 9419 S. 204th Place Kent, WA 98031 Subject: Native Growth Protection Easement-- Renton Crown Apartments LUA-96-038,ECF,SA Dear Mr. Jaeger: The Easement language you submitted has been reviewed by the City Attorney and the Property Management section of the City of Renton. The City Attorney's comments are attached for your review. The Property Management Section, Bob MacOnie found the language at the bottom of the first paragraph in the legal description very confusing. He would prefer that the direction (northwest, etc.) was attached to a particular line. You may want to contact him directly at 277-5569 to resolve this issue. The easement should be recorded as soon as these corrections are completed. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 277-5586. Sincerely, ,i‘171/ Mark R. P ell, AICP Project anager 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer SR-414 -03g CITI DF RENTON "LL Office of the City Attorney Jesse Tanner,Mayor Lawrence J.Warren 'DEVELOPMENT PLANNING :. CITY OF RENTON ' MEMORANDUM JUL 0 3 1997 To: Mark R. Pywell RECEIVED From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date• July 2, 1997 • Subject: Native Growth Protection Easement -Renton Crown Apartments I have reviewed the above-referenced document and the same is approved as to legal form provided that the fourth word "shall" on the first line beneath WITNESSETH is changed,to "does hereby." - Lawrence Warren LJW:as: cc: Jay Covington A8:132.54. • Post Office Box 6261, .1//0O S. 2nd Street- Renton, Washington 98057 - (206)255-8678 ' 'C�•This nnnor rnnf�inc cno%rnrvrinrl...��oa�i onoi....�......... .,.... NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT This agreement made this day of , 1997 between Kohl Excavating, Inc. (GRANTOR), owner in fee of that certain parcel of land described in Exhibit "A", and the City of Renton. rr WITNESSETH Ike That the GRANTOR stnsJl designate a specific portion of that property described in Exhibit "A" as a Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE). Said portion is more specifically described in Exhibit "B". Said NGPE includes steep slope sensitive areas and shall include the following attached restrictions: Designation of a Native Growth Protection Easement acknowledges a beneficial public interest in the land within the. easement. This interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, visual and aural buffering, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The NGPE imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the land subject to the easement the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by the City of Renton, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the easement. The vegetation within the easement may not be cut, pruned, removed or damaged without express permission from the City of Renton, which permission must be obtained in writing from the City of Renton Dept. of Public Works. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said GRANTOR has hereunto signed his name. STATE OF WASHINGTON, ss County of King On this day of , 19 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Witness my hand an official sea]. hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at COMMISSION EXPIRES • • • EX H 1 B l T PPGE I or 3 PARCEL "A" That portion of Blocks 36 Lind 39 , of Bryn Mawr Addition II E filed in Volume 5 of pl. rlts , page 58 , records of King County , Wnshine-or, , and of the vneated streets and aIIe-yn adjoln trig , described vs follows : Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot- 9 , Block 36 , of said Pint ; thence S02°00 ' 53"W along the f:nst line of Raid Lot 9 a distance of 50 . 00 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 7 of said Block 36 ; thence 587°07 ' 07"E along the North line or said Lot 7 and along its Westerly extension , n distance of 145 feet , more or iess , to the Westerly msrggin of Rainier. Avenue ; thence SoUthensterly Along held 'Westerly margin 353 feet , more or less , to the South line of the NW 1 /4 of Section 7 , Township 7.3 North , RAnge 5 E11f;t , W,M. , being the centerline of vacated South 120th Street; thence Westerly along bald centerline 1i05 feel , more or less , to the centerline of vacated 89th Avenue South ; thence NO2°00 ' 53"W along staid centerline 520 feet , mote or le.ssd to the centerline of. vi3crited South 118th Street ; thence S87 07 ' 07"E ni.ong said 'centerline 150 feet more or less , to the Northerly extension the Eest line of Lot. 17 , Block 36 , of said Pint ; thence S02°00' 53"W along the Northerly extension and along the East line of said Lot 17 A dibitrttce of 130 feet , more or less , to the Northwest corner of Lot 9 of said Block ; thence S87°07 ' 07"E: along said North litre 10 . 00 feet to the t'lorthehst corner of said Lot 9 And the point of beginning. • E) -tt13 T.._... .PR _..- -- PPsGe_ 2 of _3 • FARCEL "s" That potation of Blocks 35 , 36 , 39 , and 40 , of Bryn Mawr Addition ns filed in Volume 5 of pints , pnge 58 , records of King County , Washington ; and of the vncnted streets and alleys nd joining , described as fol lbws Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 12 , Block 440 of said Flat ; thence N87°07 ' 07"W Along the southerly boundary of Lots 22 , 23 , and 24 , of stud Block 40 , and along their westerly extension , 98 . 00 feet to the centerline of the vacated alley adjoining se.id Lot 24 ; thence NO2°00 ' 53"E along the centerline of said alley . 100 . 00 feet to the Southerly margin of vacated South 119th Street ; thence northerly across said Street 60 . 00 feet to the centerline of the vacated alley Adjoining Lot 9 , Block 35 of said pint ; thence t102°00 ' 53"E along said centerline 100 . 00_ feet to the to the Westerly extension of the Notrtb line of Lot 9 , Block 35 of said plat ; thence •587°07 ' 07"E along Said Westerly extension and along the North line of Lots 9 , 10 , 11 and 12 of said Block 128 . 00 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 20 , Block 35 , of said plat ; thence t102°00' 53"E along the West line of said Lot 20 end along its Northerly extension 130 . 00 feet to the centerline of vacated South 118th Sttent ; thence S87°07 ' 07"T; along the centerline of vncnted South 118th Street 150 . 00 feet to the centerline of vacated 89th Avenue South ; thence S02 ° 00 ' 53"W along staid centerline 520 .00 feet , more or less , to the South line of the NW 1/4 of Section 7 , Township 23 North, Runge 5 East , W.M. , being the centerline ' of vactated South 120th Street ; thence Westerly along sAid .centerline 180 feet , more or less., to the Southerly extension of the Welt line of Lot 12. , 131.ock 40 of said plat ; thence Northerly along the Southerly extension Acid along the West line of said Lot 12 a dtatance of 130 t:eet. , more or less , to the point of beginning. • • • EH B tr. Pi PR GE 3 of s PARCL „10„ • That portion of Plonks 30 , 35 And 36 , of Bryn iinwt: Addition on filed in Volume- 5 of plats , page 58 , records of V.. I.ng CUctnt- y , Washington , and of the vnr_nled rat: t'e.N. ts and alleys adjoining , dencribed As follows : f3egi.nntog at the northeast corner of Lot 9 , Block 36 , of said Pint ; thence 502 °00 ' 53"W along the East line of. sntcl Lot 9 a distance of 50 . 00 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 7 of said Block 36 ; thence S87°07 ' 07"E along the North line of said t.ot land along its Westerly extenniort a distance of 145 feint , more ot less , to the Westerly margin ot Rainter. Avenue ; thence Northwebtei-iy along said Westerly margin 180 feet , more or lead to the centerline of vacated South 118th Street ; thence Wetterly hlong said centerline 136 feet , more or less ; to the Northerly extension of the' East line of Lot: 17 , Block 36 , of arced plat ; thence Southerly Along t:he Northerly extension and along the East line of sand i.ol 17 a cltst:nnce of 130 feet , more or 1ebb , to the Northwest corner. of Lot 9 , of said Block ; thence S87°07 ' 07"E along Said North line 30 . 00 feel to the Northeast corner of said Lot 9 had the point of beginning . TOGETHER WITH Lotb 13 , 14 , 15 , and 16 , Block 30 , of said Plat: . rand together with that portion of the West half of Vacated 89th Avenue South adjoining siai.d Lots on the Fast , and 'together with the North hitlf of vacated South 118th Street adjoining said vhchted 89th Avenue South and Lots on the South . TOGETHER WI1'tl Lotb 21. , 22 , 23 , and 26 , of 13locic 35 of snld Pint and together with the East halt of vrtcnted d l ley -ad joining I.ot 214 on the West find- the South half of vactrted South 118th Street adjoining said Lcits on the North . r`• EXHIBIT B NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Blocks 30, 35, 39 and 40, of Bryn Mawr Addition as filed in Volume 5 of plats, page 58, records of King County, Washington, and of the vacated streets and alleys adjoining; situated northwest, west, southwest and south of the easement line described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 13, Block 30 of said plat; thence S 87'07' 07" E, along the north line of Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16 and along their easterly extension 150.00 ft. to the centerline of vacated 89th Ave. S.; thence S 02'00' 00" W, along said centerline 35.00 ft. to the Tnie Point of Beginning. Thence S 50'•00' 00" W, 200.00 ft. Thence S 40'00' 00" W, 145.00 ft. Thence due south, 120.00 ft. Thence S 32' 00' 00" E, 232.00 ft. Thence due east, 508.00 ft. more or less to the west right-of- way line of Rainier Ave. S., the end of said easement line. From y'u w LEITZKE THE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS Fax:206.747-2083.y.ice:206-747-0414 To:Art Larsen'Corey Thomas Page 1 of 2 Wednesday,September 04,1996 9:41:37 AM • RENTON FIRE DEPT • Mr_IT \,"�NT;:'ON BUREAU • SEP041ggg Fax Transmission HECEIVED Date: Wednesday, September 04, 1996 Time: 9:27:00 AM 2 Pages To: Art Larsen/Corey Thomas phone: fax: 277-4426 • From: STEVE LEITZKE THE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS phone: 206-747-0414 fax: 206-747-2083 Re: Gentlemen, The loop road for the Crown Apartments is proposed to be modified per this sketch, utilizing a hammerhead configuration. This change is necessary to avoid disturbing the steep slope adjacent to Building E. Our soils engineer and civil engineer do not want to undermine the slope by even one foot and to punch the road through would require at least a ten foot cut. Assuming this modification is acceptable, Mark Pvwell will need a letter of, acceptance from you. •aE LEITZKE THE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS Fax:206-747-2083 VPlce:206-747-0414 To:Art Larsen/Corey Thomas Page 2 of 2 Wednesday,September 04,1996 9:42:41 AM ) -1 .• • 1 TO r3e OM►fircry 4 _ 5Poul N POTTED4-1° '� J5p —' too-Z O o . i P IR bJ op SIAPE i i • 4Ln4+ E t.z •od 2• i tz it., '• J it._ ,o.... ‘, \tiiI \ ....._7_,\.c • 0 ..... ,4., 1.-- — ----- --------D \ , 4, iy, 4,, . } � MO rot) . .Alk \ , 75 20 Q>,'Cb 3 \ c a Si•dD 0 1 ❑ ) 1 Lc=96 THii 2: 19 FM EARTH ULT .iIT• S INC. FAX NO. 20 , 16 0860 P. r Earth Consultants Inc. \ly CI} Cie'•r�i`c hrik;l�ng;n rs.C;t lugists&Envin,nrtu;nral Scie nli%I, September 12, 1996 E-7186 Renton Crown LLC 704 Northeast Northlake Way Seattle, Washington 98105 Attention; Mr. Mark Lundberg Subject: Proposed Roadway Cuts Fire Access Road Renton Crown Apartments Renton, Washington Reference: Earth Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Study E-7186, dated March 21, 1996 Golder Associates Geotechnical Engineering Report 883-1538, dated November 1988 Dear Mr. Lundberg; In accordance with the request of Steve Leitzke, we reviewed the referenced reports for the purpose of evaluating soil conditions in the vicinity of the proposed fire access road west of Building "E," We understand that to construct the portion of the proposed access road west of Building "E", cuts of up to approximately ten feet into the toe of the existing slope will be required. The existing slope in this area has grades of approximately sixty to seventy percent, and is located in a designated greenbelt area. Our review of the referenced reports indicates the soil conditions along the toe of the slope west of Building "E" consist of approximately eight feet of loose silty sand fill. Below the fill, stiff lean clay is encountered. Based on these soil conditions and the steep grade of the existing slope, it is our opinion excavation along the toe of the slope could cause significant disturbance and instability of the slope. 1805-136th Place N.E.,Suite 201,Bellevue,Washington 98005 Gnllone f)11r;1 itid7.47An SAattla(2061 464-1584 FAX(206)74-608-60 Tacoma(206)272-6608 .-!2 6 THE' 2: 19 PM EARTH c SUL TANTS, INC. FAX N0. 206(�"46 0860 P. Renton Crown LLC E-7186 September 12, 1996 Page 2 We hope this information meets your current needs. If you have any questions, please call. Respectfully submitted, • 'TN CONSULTANTS, INC. 41- ymond A. Coglas Staff Engineer Robert S. Levinson, P.E. Principal RAC;RSUsdk Firth Cansutt8nts, Inc. 09/11/1996 13:43 20685009( JAEGER ENGINEER PAGE 01 Jg-tgEK ENQIIl !NEEDg 5415 J.204 FLAKE • KENTIV1 98031 - .4200 850.0934 - fax 727-5320 September 6, 1996 RENTS FIRE DEPT Art Larson/ Cory Thomas ;ESE PREVENTION BUREAU City of Renton, Fire Prevention Bureau SEP1119% Sent via FAX to: 277-4426 Dear Mr. Larson: RECEIVED I am writing on behalf of the proposed Renton Crown Apartment project . I am the civil engineer working on this project for the developer. Your Department has been working with Steve Leitzke, the project architect, on the site plan (particularly the fire access) . I am now working on the grading plan and I have expressed to Mr. Leitzke my concern about constructing a road around the west end of the buildings . I understand that this road is desired to gain vehicular access to all sides of the buildings, but a portion of this road is extremely questionable. The problem is where the road passes next to the northwest corner of building E (the northwest building on the site) . At this location, the steep hillside to the west 'is very near the building. Any road construction around the building would require a tall (15' plus) retaining wall to hold back the hillside slope. This existing slope is very steep and unstable at this point . Even a massive retaining wall may have difficulty securing a stable foundation. Due to the history of instability across this entire hillside, I cannot recommend any cutting of the bank, especially of the magnitude that would be required for this continuous road. We should explore other alternatives to achieve the required emergency access . Please feel free to call with any questions . Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, qeivyyJLD James J. Jaeger, P.E. .43 2068500.9 JAEGER ENGINEEPT_ . PAGE 02 J 7 i I / i i tk / il .._/1 , 1 I Si • I / / •92°I - / cl/ .41.2. •'.• . •• .I..L_./7._'•-._:7_1r:tli 1I• i Ps /a ° ,r/ • 1.... .._._,,‘ •.,7-..-/,,-11. /• .. 1--. 2;17,'.7-4„:-...",/ ' II ( ji - - -1 // : i ,/ - - .,. r. if 111 A - ' .,,,0 ,--- . - kii.., •• .P!. i.i,. /' fq I. lei ,../ , I ..,/ , et I :_ •-d. <1?',..- , A_ ,i 7/ / . . ' Illiv ,trmi„... ..,;:,,sa - , 6 ,/_., , vikalseav,--- - iirirtiv7.-e-rn, Itam le ; si.-io9 (.5ip"1 • . .. \ ,/ , ' . e,' . ,. ., . . • ,,,,,, . . • ........../. ,.....\ i •. • 0,A . ll'^‘ ‘ 11//7.• k ea. , c. . G. 6 . ___. ) ' . ,,.,• \..\\ •.. , , , • . .__ .,,, \ -i, „ . . ., , , . „ ..... i \ „ ) • \ .... i , .,„ „„ .,. ,. ...., ,., \ L,„. NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT This agreement made this day of , 1997 between Kohl Excavating, Inc. (GRANTOR), owner in fee of that certain parcel of land described in Exhibit "A", and the City of Renton. WITNESSETH That the GRANTOR shall designate a specific portion of that property described in Exhibit "A" as a Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE). Said portion is more specifically described in Exhibit "B". Said NGPE includes steep slope sensitive areas and shall include the following attached restrictions: Designation of a Native Growth Protection Easement acknowledges a beneficial public interest in the land within the easement. This interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, visual and aural buffering, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The NGPE imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the land subject to the easement the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by the City of Renton, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the easement. The vegetation within the easement may not be cut, pruned, removed or damaged without express permission from the City of Renton, which permission must be obtained in writing from the City of Renton Dept. of Public Works. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said GRANTOR has hereunto signed his name. STATE OF WASHINGTON, ss County of King On this day of , 19 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Witness my hand an official sea]. hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at COMMISSION EXPIRES • • • • • PAGE I or 3 • PARCF1. "A" • That portion of Blocks 36 zlnd 39 , of ih:ytt Mawr Addition as filed in Volume. 5 of pldts , page 58 , records of King County , Wnshittl;ton , and cif the vecnind streets and nl lva . nd jointttg , described an follows : Beginning at the northeast cornet or Lot 9 , Block 36 , of said Pint ; thence S02°00 ' 53"W along the t:nst line of said Lot 9 a ditatnnce of • 50 .00 feel: to the Northwest cornet of Lot 7 of said Block 36 ; thence S87°07 ' 07"E along the Nor. th . line of said Lot 7 and along its Westerly extension , n distance of 1/15 feet , more or .less , to the Westerly margin o f Rainier Avenue ; thence Southensterly along Said. Westerly margin 353 feet , more or less , to the South line of the NW 1/4 of Section 7 , Township 23 North , RAnge 5 EASE , W.M. , being the centerline of vacated South 120th Street; thence Weaterty along bait! centerline 405 feet , more or lees , to the centerline of vacated 89th Avenue South ; thence NO2°00' 53"W along said centerline 520 feet , mote or trtssd to the centerline of. v4crited South ll8th Street ; thence. S87 07 ' 07"E along bald 'centerline 150 feet more or less , to the Northerly extension the East line of Lot. 17 , Block 36 , of snld Pint ; thence 502°00' 53"W along the Northerly extension end along the East line of said Lot 17 a diattattce of 130 feet , more or less , to the Northwest corner of Lot 9 of said Block ; thence S87°07 ' 07"E: along said North litre 10 . 00 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 9 and the point of- beginning . :.. • • AXE-1.16 l T R --..._PAGE 2 ©F• .3 FAnciL "R" That potation of Blocks 35 , 36 , 39 , end 40 , of Bryn Mawr Addition ns filed in volume 5 of pints , page 58 , records or. King County , Wnsltittgtott , and of the vncnted streets and nl l.ny s ndjoining , described es follbws Beginning at .the Northwest corner of Lot 12 , Block 40 of said Flat ; thence N87°07 ' 07"W Along the southerly boundary of Lots 22 , 23 , and 24 , of said Block 40 , nnd along their westerly extension , 98 .00 feet to the centerline of the vacated alley ndjoining sbid Lot 24 ; thence NO2°00 ' 53"E h.long the center. 1 lne of said alley 100 . 00 feet to the Southerly margin of vdcat-ed South 119th Street ; thence northerly across sdid Street 60 . 00 feet to the centerline of the vacdtecl Alley ndJol.tti.ng Lot 9 , Block 35 of said. pint; thence t102°00 ' 53"E thong stud centerline 1 00 . 0(1. feet to the to the WetyEerl.y eixtension of the North line of Lot: 9 , Block 35 of said plet ; thence S87°07 ' 07"E along nnid Westerly extension and along the North line of Lots 9 , 10 , 11 and. 12 of sntd Block 128 . 00 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 20 , Block 35 , of said plat ;thence t102°00 ' 53"E along the West line of sold 1,4 20 and along its Northerly extension 130 . 00 feet to the centerline of vacated South 118th Street ; thence 587'07 ' 07"R along the Centerline of vncnted South 118th Street 150 . 00 feet to the cent:erl. l_ne . o f vacated 89th Avenue South ; thence . S02 °00 ' 53"W along said centerline 520 .00 feet , more or less , to the South line of the NW 1/4 of Section 7 , Toi. nnhlp 23 North, Range 5 East , W.M. , being the centerli:ne ' of vacated Sotith 12.0th Stteet ; thence Westerly along Odd -centerll.tte 180 feet , more or less , to the Southerly extension of the Went lind of Lot 1.2. , Block 40 of said plat ; thence Northerly along the Southerly extension And Along the West line of said Lot 12 a diatence of 130 feet , more or less , to the point of beginning. • • E><H B IT- A PRG€ 3 oF 3 rARCLL. "b" that portion of Blocks 30, 35 hnd 36 , of Bryn tlnwr. Addition on filed in Volume- 5 of plats , page- 58 , records of ring C;outnt-y , Washington , and of Elie vhcnted streets and alleys adjoining , described its follows : Beginning tit the . ttorttieast corner of: Lot 9 , Block 36 , of said Pint ; thence S02°00 ' 53"W along the East line of snlcl Lot 9 a distance of. 50 . 00 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 7 of said Block 36 ; thence S$7°07 ' 07"E along the North line of staid Lot 7tind along its Weater. ly extension n distance. of 145 feet , more of less , Eo the Westerly margin or Rainier. Avenue ; thence .1Jorthwesterly along said Westerly margin 180 feet , more or lest# , to the centerline of vacated South 118th Street ; thence Westerly ttlon,g hni.d centerline 13.6 feet , more or less , to the Northerly extension or the East line of Lot 17 , Block 36 , .of said plat ; thence Southerly Along t:he 1•lortherly extension and along the East line of said Lot 17 n distance of 130 feet , more or let313 , to the Northwest corner. of Lot 9 , of said Block ; thence S87°07 ' 07"E along, said North line 30 . 00 feet to Elm Northeast cot-tier of Saki Lot 9 raid the poi.nE of beginning . TOGETHER WITH Lott; 13 , 14 , l5 , and 16 , Block 30 , of snld Flak , and together with that portion of the • West half of Vacated 89th Avenue South adjoining fie1.d Lots on the East , and -together with Elie North haif of vacated South 11.8th Street ad joining said v&dried 89th Avenbe South hnd lots on the South . TOGETIIER WITH Loth 21 , 22 , 23 , and 26 , of Block 35 of enid Pint.: and together. with the East halt of vacated eliey 'adjoining Lot2.1� on the West and- the South half of vacated South 118th Street adjoining said Latta on the North . • • • EXHIBIT B NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Blocks 30, 35, 39 and 40, of Bryn Mawr Addition as filed in Volume 5 of plats, page 58, records of King County, Washington, and of the vacated streets and alleys adjoining; situated northwest, west, southwest and south of.the easement line described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 13, Block 30 of said plat; thence S 87'07' 07" E, along the north line of Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16 and along their easterly extension 150.00 ft. to the centerline of vacated 89th Ave. S.; thence S 02'00' 00" W, along said centerline 35.00 ft. to the True Point of Beginning. Thence S 50'•00' 00" W, 200.00 ft. Thence S 40'00' 00" W, 145.00 ft. Thence due south, 120.00 ft. Thence S 32' 00' 00" E, 232.00 ft. Thence due east, 508.00 ft. more or less to the west right-of- way line of Rainier Ave. S., the end of said easement line. FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF: Office of the City Clerk ". City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RELEASE OF COVENANTS WHEREAS, by letter to the Renton City Council dated June 20, 1996, the attorney for the owners of the property to which the Covenants that are recorded under King County Recording Nos. 8710220434, 8710220435 and 8710220436 refer requested that the City expressly release those Covenants; and WHEREAS, the City Council's Planning and Development Committee duly considered the request for release and made a recommendation to the full Council that the Covenants be released; and WHEREAS, during the regular meeting of the Renton City Council held on August 12, 1996, the Council directed the release of those Covenants. WHEREFORE, the City of Renton does hereby fully release the above-referenced Covenants 0 and render them of no further force or effect. C� SIGNED this 4" day of , L120 , 1996. Ci CITY OF RENTON, a Washington municipal corporation By: Jes e Tanner, Mayor ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Brenda Fritsvold, Deputy City Clerk RELEASE OF COVENANTS--Page 1 of 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM: aeoitivitatocbV/Pel Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney STATE OF WASHINGTON) )ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this L-14. day of S3 tom,' , 1996, before nbe per onally appeared Jesse Tanner and . Brenda Fritsvol4 to me known to be the Mayor and? ity Clerk of the City of Renton, the Washington municipal corporation described in and that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument. f.%? IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day cc c and year first above written. T-1eml f / NOT- RY PUB ''C in and for the State of Washington, residing at jg )+---' Cl: My commission expires: /P 97 RELEASE OF COVENANTS--Page 2 of 2 9(42 _v3 1) SA CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 3, 1996 TO: Marilyn J. Petersen City Clerk FROM: . 'ark R. Pywell, AICP / Project Manager SUBJECT: Release of Covenants Renton Crown Apartments Attached is the release of covenants prepared by David Halinen. Larry Warren has reviewed them and approved them as to form. If you would obtain the signatures and have them recorded we can finally complete the paper work for this project. Thank you. NIEAIO.DOT/ HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. A Professional Service Corporation David L.Halinen,P.E. Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building "`FVELOPMENT PLANNING (206)443-4684 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 NTON Fax(206)646-3467 Bellevue,Washington 98004 AUG 2 81996 • criEGLNED August 26, 1996 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Attn: Mark R. Pywell, AICP RE: Release of Covenants for the Renton Crown Apartments Property Dear Mark: Per your request, I have prepared and herewith enclose a form of Release of Covenants for the above-referenced matter. Please have this form duly signed, notarized and recorded. Please ask • the City Clerk to forward a.copy of the filly-executed instrument to me once it has been recorded. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. David L. H linen Enclosure cc: Renton Crown Apartments L.L.C. Attn: Mark Lundberg (with copy of enclosure) Attn: Ivan Christianson (with copy of enclosure) C:\CF\2275\002\COV-RLSE\PYWELL.LT1 FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF: Office of the City Clerk City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RELEASE OF COVENANTS WHEREAS, by letter to the Renton City Council dated June 20, 1996, the attorney for the owners of the property to which the Covenants that are recorded under King County Recording Nos. 8710220434, 8710220435 and 8710220436 refer requested that the City expressly release those Covenants; and WHEREAS, the City Council's Planning and Development Committee duly considered the request for release and made a recommendation to the full Council that the Covenants be released; and • WHEREAS, during the regular meeting of the Renton City Council held on August 12, 1996, the Council directed the release of those Covenants. WHEREFORE,the City of Renton does hereby fully release the above-referenced Covenants and render them of no further force or effect. • SIGNED this day of , 1996. CITY OF RENTON, a Washington municipal corporation By: Jesse Tanner, Mayor ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Marilyn J. Petersen, CMC, City Clerk RELEASE OF COVENANTS--Page 1 of 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney STATE OF WASHINGTON) )ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of , 1996, before me personally appeared Jesse Tanner and Marilyn J. Petersen, to me known to be the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Renton, the Washington municipal corporation described in and that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My commission expires: RELEASE OF COVENANTS--Page 2 of 2 05, OF RENTON . Office of the City Attorney Jesse Tanner,Mayor • Lawrence J.Warren MEMORANDUM To: Mark R Pywell, AICP From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date: August 29, 1996 Subject: Release of Covenants Renton Crown Apartments I have reviewed the above-reference document and the same4s approved as to legal form.. .. _ L ence J r en',awre 'Warr - �t art -. LJW:as: .cc' Ja Covin on • • • • ;T: Post Office.Box'626- 100 S. 2nd Street ::Renton,Washington 98057 - (206)255-8678 • a © CITY OF RENTON PlanningBuilding/Public Works r v. K r° '�!'ef " '" ' / r -J0 Mill Avenue South 1� Renton, Washington 98055 �-, Il6 16'96 • :: T: 1 1• 7154076 U.S. P4 IL f Irv,- Mike Meyer 0111 8731 S 11th Place C4 Seattle, WA 98178 s� RETURN .- �, rt .4:sr„4 QC6i _� c i- ), *. 4'' 1 y ,r.,f,lei „1..1 i : I i i t •ii • ' i i ii i _ l •�•�r 53 ihh,i:2iohiEEiiit:ii iiiiiiliiiiiitiiiiiitiiitiiiiiiiiiiii ..w _ CITY-OF :RENTON • - := Planning/Building/Public Works.Department ' Jesse Tanner,Mayor : Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • August 15, 1996 . . . . • Mr. Steve Leitzke . ' -. . • ; =.The Leitzke Architects -. . - 6102 142nd:Ave. SE , -. . Bellevue, WA 98006 - Subject: Renton Crown Apartments Dear Mr. Leitzke: ,.We have reviewed your letter, dated August 1,2, 1996, and the revised site plan, marked revision 1. The ` . ::'-' proposed revisions are considered to:be,:minor..and consistent with the 'revision discussed before the -. Hearing Examiner during the public hearing'process._The revision to the site plan are approved.'-•< ,;: ••: •,; ' The,revisions :'include,the relocation`^of.the,-'entrance'to,,.the„north and ,the subsequent,:relocation of - , •-' Building Ato•_the"south,.the construction;:of an access`roadway,behind`Buildings.E,=:F, and G, !and'.the..:-',',': ` ,•.: raising of the,base elevation of the;site by approximately.five feet. The;height of the buildings will still be; below t•hat of the.adjacent hills.(approximately elevation 130) It is still the responsibility.of the applicant "':'--';•r to`file a.Noe--'f P.ro P osed.Ciinstru0to n-w ,,: < ,.,-.p. i n lth the'FAA :�:�:�`•�:- - �t .L„ Y _ _Sys ... •, "This administrative_determination:.will be•flnal'Yunless'a wntten'appeal of this determination-is-filed :with�: °`�: .'•-'_;=., . the City's_Hearing,:Examiner within 14.:days=of.;the'date.of'this decision.::`:,•See :Section:4-8-11'of.the:` : - .Renton:Municipal Code•for,further information on:the appeal.process.;:-?'ti.. ; : : _. , Smcerel - Mark-R.P, I `AICP Pr ct aae' J 9 g ' k C. . i:Y:''fir. :200 Mill_:Avenue"South`. Reritori'Washington�98055 - :;'®This paper contains 50 J recycled material,20%post consumer.' S. ALIO121996 ri p E57 UFVF • LUr�r�iFN II II5�ZII CITY OF ReNTONNING L In ACK lTECT 6102 142ND AVE.5.E. BELLEVUE,WA.98000 VOICE:206-747-0414 - • - FAX/DATA:206-747-2083 PAGER:989-9375 August 12, 1996 _ t Mark I'ywell City of Renton Dear Mark : Attached are copies of the revised Crown Apartment site plan. The revisions include relocation of the driveway entrance to the North.per the Hearing Examiners suggestion. The relocated entrance driveway benefits the site in the following ways: 1. The driveway entrance on the original plan would have required a variance for slope to 15 percent from the Public Works department. The revised plan shows a driveway approach of less than 12 percent. 2. The addition of the loop road and the driveway has resulted in revisions to the grading pl fin. The amount of exported material is substantially reduced (+20000 cu. yds.) and he large retaining wall to the south of the parking areas for BLDGS C &G has been a iminated reducing the overall impacts to the earth and also impacts to traffic during construction. The access road loop has been added per the conditions of approval. However. crash gates f Ir fire access have not'been provided for the following reasons: 1. Havingone to the expense of constructingthis roadway,the landowner is entitled 9 p Y to use thi� road for the benefit of the tenants and to allow alternative paths within the develoibment. It will be stripped as a firelane. Crash gates also restrict access and are ge-erally troublesome for the local fire departments. These plans are submitted for your review. We believe that these modifications are minor and are due in part as a result of conditions and recommendations of the Hearing Examiner. . .40041p eve eitzke, Architec xt • • • %,% : r CITY OF RENTON • -1:1. \1. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner.Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 15, 1996 Mr. Steve Leitzke The Leitzke Architects 6102 142nd Ave. SE Bellevue, WA 98006 Subject: Renton Crown Apartments Dear Mr. Leitzke: We have reviewed your letter, dated August 12, 1996, and the revised site plan, marked revision 1. The proposed revisions are considered to be minor.and consistent with the revision discussed before the Hearing Examiner during the public hearing process. The revision to the site plan are approved. .• The revisions include the relocation,of the entrance to the north and the subsequent relocation of Building A to the south, the construction of an access roadway'behind Buildings E, F, and G, and the raising of the base elevation of the site by approximately five feet. The height of the buildings will still be below that of the adjacent hills (approximately elevation 130). It is still the responsibility of the applicant to file a Notice-of ProposedConstruction with the FAA �� a" This administrative determination will be`final'unless a written appeal of this determination is filed with the City's Hearing Examiner within 14 days of..the date of this decision:` See Section 4-8-11 of the Renton Municipal Code for further information o the appeal process., Sincerely, Mark R. P I,AICP Project anager • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton,Washington 98055 .ca- Robert Levinson David Halinen Patricia Jarvis 1805- 136th Place NE, #201 10500 NE 8th,#1900 PO Box 1056 Bellevue, WA 98005 Bellevue,WA 98004 Renton, WA 9805 Wallace Morgan Carol Geiger Mike Meyer 11900- 87th Ave S 11914- 87th Ave S 8731 S 11th Place Seattle, WA 98178 Seattle, WA 98178 Seattle, WA 98178 Ethel Woodward Laura Baggett Chris Feldt 8816 South 122nd Street 11225 - 84th Avenue South 11908- 87th Avenue South Seattle, WA 98178 Seattle, WA 98178 Seattle, WA 9818 Tony Hoare Jim Spears 600 Market Place, #1 8735 South 117th Place 2003 Western Avenue Seattle, WA 9818 Seattle, WA 98121 August 12, 1996 Renton City Council Minutes - Page 311 CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from William K. Goodwin, 701 Fifth Ave., Seattle, Citizen Comment 98104, representing Landmark Development Group II, formally withdrawing Goodwin - Lexington its appeal of one of the seven issues raised in its appeal letter submitted on Ridge Apartments Site 7/09/96 regarding the Lexington Ridge Apartments site approval. The issue Approval Appeal, 300 being withdrawn is #6 regarding the requirement related to planting. Vuemont P1 NE, SA-95- 184 Citizen Comment Correspondence was read from Alain D. Bourdoiseau, 1915 NE 27th St., Bourdoiseau - Houser Way Renton, 98056, relaying his concerns about the installation of an HOV (high HOV Lane occupancy vehicle, or carpool) lane as part of the NE Sunset Boulevard improvement project at Maple Valley Highway. II Councilman Edwards stated that the letter echoed his sentiments regarding the HOV lanes, and asked if this matter had gone through Committee. Mayor Tanner replied that it had not, and added that the matter will be reviewed. Responding to Council inquiry, Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator, explained that the Sunset Boulevard freeway on-ramp project is not related to ramp metering. He confirmed that the State must reach an agreement with the City before any ramp metering is installed. Continuing, Mr. Zimmerman stated that the marking of the HOV lanes is a Transportation Improvement Project (TIP) being performed by the City in order to conform with the Growth Management Act. The HOV lanes portion of that road made the City eligible for about $1.8 million in grant funds for that project and the Houser Way Bypass project. He added that unless HOV elements are incorporated into TIP projects, many types of State and Federal grant funding will not be made available to the City. Mayor Tanner acknowledged the importance of the funding, however he believed the requirements for HOV designation can be met without causing traffic problems for motorists exiting and entering the major highways. Citizen Comment Halinen Correspondence was read from David L. Halinen, 10500 NE 8th St., Suite - Aqua Barn Property, 1900, Bellevue, 98004, representing Aqua Barn Ranch Inc., regarding the Maple Valley Hwy/152nd north ten acres of Aqua Barn's property located at the intersection of Maple Ave SE Valley Highway and 152nd Ave. SE. He requested that Council pass a resolution indicating that the City does not object to the King County comprehensive plan and area zoning amendment to Neighborhood Business. Mr. Halinen also requested that a pre-annexation agreement be considered by the Council. II MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS ITEM TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Planning & Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Planning & Development report regarding the Renton Crown Apartments removal of existing covenants. Committee The applicant submitted a site plan application to construct 106 one and two Building: Renton Crown bedroom units on a 7.5 acre site (File No. SA-96-038). The project site is Apartments Site Approval, located at Rainier Ave. S. and S. 119th St., across from the Renton Municipal Rainier Ave N, SA-96- Airport. The Hearing Examiner denied the application but under appeal the 038 City Council reversed the Hearing Examiner's determination and approved the project. As part of the approval, the applicant was required to address the existing covenants on the project site. II August 12, 1996 Renton City Council Minutes Page 312 The covenants were recorded as a requirement of a previous project that had been approved for this site but was never constructed. The covenants prohibited development above the 70 foot contour line on the project site after the proposed grading was to have been completed. However, the grading was never initiated and therefore, the contour line was never established. The intent of the covenant was to protect the steep slopes from development. The new project that is proposed, and recently approved by the City Council, established a different grading pattern. The steep slopes on the site will be protected by Native Growth Protection easements. These easements will not II only prevent development of the steep slopes but will also protect the native vegetation on the slopes. Staff recommended that the City Council allow the existing covenants (that were part of the previous project) to be removed. The Planning and Development Committee concurred with the staff recommendation regarding this matter. The Committee recommended that the City Clerk be directed to prepare appropriate documentation to release the covenants that were part of the • previous project. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning: 1996 Planning & Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Comprehensive Plan report regarding the 1996 Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The Committee Amendments met in several sessions in June and July to review the Proposed 1996 Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The Committee recommended adoption of these amendments as shown on the matrix dated July 31, 1996. The Committee also directed staff to prepare the necessary ordinance, map, and policy text amendments to implement these recommendations. The Committee also recommended that the pending 1995 Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Pan Abode Site, involving a proposed change in it designation from Employment Area Industrial to Commercial Arterial, be continued until after the 1997 Amendment Cycle. MOVED BY KEOKER- WHEELER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE II COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 314 for ordinance.) Development Services: Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Sign Code Exemptions report regarding sign provisions for City sponsored signs and events. The (City and Public Service existing Sign Code does not include a specific provision for City signs, Signs) distinguishing them from advertising/identification signs for commercial businesses, etc. In addition, the Code prohibits both off-premise signs and signs located in public rights-of-way. The proposed amendments would exempt different types of City signs from Sign Code requirements. Signs that would be located within public rights-of-way would require approval of the sign placement by the City Transportation Systems Division. This review would mitigate potential traffic safety and sight distance concerns. The Committee recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the amendment to the Sign Code, Chapter 20 of Title IV, City of Renton Building Regulations. The amendment would exempt the following r APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Date /a- 4 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT August 12, 1996 Renton Crown Apartments - - Removal of Existing Easements • (Referred July 1, 1996 ) The applicant submitted a site plan application to construct 106 one and two bedroom units on a 7.5 acre site (File No. LUA 96-038, SA, ECF). .The project site is located at Rainier Ave. South and South 119th Street, •across Rainier from the Renton Municipal Airport. The Hearing Examiner denied the application but under appeal the City Council reversed the Hearing Examiner's determination and approved the project. As part of the approval the applicant Nvas required to address the existing covenants on the project site._ The covenants.were recorded as a requirement of a previous.project that had been approved for this site but was never'constructed. The covenants prohibited development above the 70 foot contour line on the project . site after the proposed grading was to have been completed. .However, the grading was never initiated and - therefore, the contour line was never established. The intent of the covenant was to protect the steep slopes from development . • The new project-that is proposed, and recently approved by the City Council, established a different grading pattern. The steep slopes on the site will be protected by Native Growth Protection easements. : Those . casements will not only prevent:,development of the steep slopes but also protect the native vegetation on:the. . slopes. = . •Staff recohimen&that the CityConneil allow the existing covenants(that'were part of the previous project)to : • be removed. The Planning and Development Committee concurs with the staff recommendation regarding this - • matter. The Committee recommends that the city clerk be directed to prepare appropriate documentation to release the coven nts that were part of the previous project. athv Kealter-Wheeler. Chair • • • Randy Corman, Vice Chair • Timothy J. Schl. ze , Member • Mark PNven - o -ECE!VE D t4LI 6 1 2 1996 -HE 57 DEVELOPMENT LIC� llIT ppIE Oa-1'OF R ��NING 6iACH T T3 6102 142ND AVE. S.E. BELLEVUE,WA.9E5006 VOICE:206-747-0414 FAX/DATA:206-747-2083 PAGER:989-9375 August 12, 1996 Mark f ywell City of Renton Dear Mark : Attached are copies of the revised Crown Apartment site plan. The revisions include relocation of the driveway entrance to the North per the Hearing Examiners suggestion. The relocated entrance driveway benefits the site in the following ways: 1. The driveway entrance on the original plan would have required a variance for slope to 15 percent from the Public Works department. The revised plan shows a driveway approach of less than 12 percent. 2. The addition of the loop road and the driveway has resulted in revisions to the grading plan. The amount of exported material is substantially reduced (+20000 cu. yds.) and the large retaining wall to the south of the parking areas for DOGS C & G has been eliminated reducing the overall impacts to the earth and also impacts to traffic during construction. The access road loop has been added per the conditions of approval. However. crash gates for fire access have not been provided for the following reasons: 1. Having gone to the expense of constructing this roadway,the landowner is entitled to use this road for the benefit of the tenants and to allow alternative paths within the development. It will be stripped as a firelane. Crash gates also restrict access and are generally troublesome for the local fire departments. These plans are submitted for your review. We believe that these modifications are minor and are clue in part as a result of conditions and recommendations of the Hearing Examiner. .40-111 eve eitzke, Architec CIT' RENTON : ;ti' -City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen July .10, 1996 Mr. David Halinen . - 10500 NE 8th, Suite 1900 • Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Appeal by Renton Crown Apartments, SA-96-038 Dear Mr. Halinen: At the regular Council meeting of July 8, 1996, the Renton City Council adopted the recommendation of the Planning and Development Committee to reverse the decision of- the hearing examiner and approve the site plan with conditions. A copy of the' ; committee report is enclosed for your information. The request to rescind restrictive covenants imposed on subject site in 1987 as a condition of future development will be reviewed .by the Planning and Development Committee as a separate issue at a later date: If I can provide additional information or assistance, please feel free to call. Sincerely, • Marilyn ersen City Clerk cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner , • Council President Toni Nelson . Jana Huerter, Development Services Division Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner • • • 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2501 t? This paper contains 50%recycled material,25%post consumer RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting ,1 July 8, 1996 Council Chambers Monday, 7:30 p.m. Municipal Building MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF TONI NELSON, Council President; BOB EDWARDS; RANDY CORMAN; COUNCILMEMBERS TIMOTHY SCHLITZER; KING PARKER; DAN CLAWSON; KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER. CITY STAFF IN JESSE TANNER, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; ATTENDANCE MARILYN PETERSEN, City Clerk; SAM CHASTAIN, Community Services Administrator; MICHAEL KATTERMANN, Planning & Technical Services Director; TERRY HIGASHIYAMA, Recreation Director; KAREN MARSHALL, Housing & Human Services Manager; DEBBIE LITTLE, Recreation Specialist; ACTING COMMANDER KEVIN MILOSEVICH, Police Department. APPROVAL OF MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES THE MINUTES OF JULY 1, 1996, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. SPECIAL Sam Chastain, Community Services Administrator, announced that the Renton PRESENTATION Rotary Club has donated $5,000 to the City's Parks & Recreation scholarship Renton Rotary Donation program. Saying this generous contribution will allow many Renton youth to to Parks & Recreation experience recreational activities such as swimming classes and day camp, Mr. Scholarship Program Chastain added that the scholarship recipients greatly appreciate the opportunity to participate in these programs. Rotarians Jim Sullivan and Bob McBeth presented the check to the City, declaring the Rotary's pleasure in being able to support the Renton community in this manner. Sandra Mootry, Rotary President, presented another check in the amount of $4,000 to the City for the Renton River Days Kid's Day circus event. Councilman Parker praised the Rotary Club's civic contributions, commenting that its annual donations to various Renton organizations and programs total approximately $100,000. APPEAL Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Planning & Development report regarding the appeal by Renton Crown Apartments, File No. SA-96- Committee 038. The Committee convened to consider the appeal by Ivan and Delores Appeal: Renton Crown Christianson and Renton Crown Apartments. Appellants appeal the decision Apartments Site Approval, of the Hearing Examiner dated June 6, 1996. The subject property is located II Rainier Ave N, SA-96- at Rainier Ave. N. and South 119th Street. The appellants seek site plan 038 approval of a proposed project to construct 106 one- or two-bedroom apartment units. The appellants appeal the Examiner's conclusion nos. 1 and 3 through 7 regarding the application of the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code to the subject site, and conclusion no. 8 regarding whether multi-family residential is permitted in the Arterial Commercial (CA) zone. In his report, the Hearing Examiner did propose an alternate recommendation which contained eight conditions should Council decide to allow the site plan. The Committee found that the Examiner committed substantial error in law in July 8, 1996 ..:nton City Council Minutes Page 270 his conclusion no. 8, that the proposal is not appropriate in this area. The Committee found that the proposed use is appropriate in the CA zone and is listed in the Zoning Code as a permitted secondary use with conditions that have been met by the proposed site plan. The Examiner did recommend that the City require the applicant to address those restrictive covenants which were imposed as a condition in a prior proposal in 1987. The Committee noted that the applicant, under separate cover, has formally requested that Council rescind these covenants. As that matter was not announced as an agenda item for this meeting, it was not considered at this time. The Committee recommended that Council reverse the decision of the Hearing Examiner and approve the Renton Crown Apartments site plan with the following conditions of the Examiner's alternate recommendation: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC). 6. The applicant shall receive the appropriate approvals to connect to the sewer system of the Bryn Mawr Service District. 7. The applicant shall provide a combination of stairway and level path on the south side of the driveway to link the complex to Rainier Ave. N. 8. The applicant shall provide an emergency access roadway that links the parking aisles from Building E to Building G, to the rear of Buildings E, F and G. It shall be gated at both ends to prevent improper parking or blockage. The Committee further recommended that Council impose a revised condition no. 4, as follows: Unless a noise study demonstrates to the satisfaction of the City of Renton Building Services Division that special window installation is not reasonably warranted, in order to inhibit interior noise levels stemming from Renton Airport noise, the residential buildings' easterly-facing windows that have an unobstructed view of the Airport's runway shall be made of either (a) double-pane glass with the outer pane having a minimum thickness of 1/4 inch and the inner pane having a minimum thickness of 3/16 inch, or (b) materials having an equivalent or better sound resistivity. Note: Condition nos. 2, 3 and 5 were not imposed as they were moot. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Responding to Councilman Corman, Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler said the request to release the restrictive covenants that were previously recorded in relation to this site will be taken up at a later Committee meeting. Deferring action on this request will not detain development of the Renton Crown Apartments project in the interim. AUDIENCE COMMENT Joan Walker, 1609 Point Lobos Lane, Santa Maria, CA, former Planning Citizen Comment: Walker Commissioner, said in the three years since she moved from Renton to - Recent Renton California, the City has accomplished many things with which she was Accomplishments impressed. She noted in particular the elegant remodel of the Council Chambers. APPROVED BY • CITY COUNCIL • Date /' 1-1 4O PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE V COMMITTEE REPORT - JULY 8, 1996 • Appeal .by ,Renton Crown Apartments, File No. SA-96-038 . • (Referred July 1; 1996) • The Planning & Development Committee . convened to consider the appeal :'''by .;Ivan and • Delores Christianson and Renton Crown Apartments. Appellants appeal the decision of the Hearing ,- Examiner: dated June 6, 1996 • The subject- property :is located at Rainier Avenue N.. and --South 119th 'St.: Appellants ;:seekwx=-•site:; ;plan :approval of a.'..proposed -project, to construct :10 6;ones.and 'twobedroom :apartment:;units.' :;': - :Appellants I appeal the"`Exami"ner's -Conclusions Nos:. 1:=and 3 *through ;. ; regarding:. the.` application of. the`"Comprel%ensive - Plan , and' the. �.r Zoning:..Code to--,thea subj e`ct ; site,:-.•and=:Con'chtielon NO., 8 'regarding' :. •• whether multi=family"residential°?is r.permt,1t -the`".CA'. Zone:- In' :his report, 'the''Ft"1Hearing ', Examiner;: did.: '.propose an Alternate , • - Recommendation whch .contained=' ;eight ;;conditions • should the •Council: decide to``?allow the,psite.�plan. a€ - : The ' Committee •found:'y' ,tY at`"'"the aHear ng„ Examiner committed .. : substantial :error <': n •S..l;aw` in '. his ' Conclusion No. ` 8, .. that -the proposal is :not-. appropriate:.,.yin this`;area' . =' The Committee found : that :the proposed use:zis appropriate : n the''"CA .Zpile„ and is; listed : _ ' = ,: . .in the :zoning code. as . aaa.permitted secondary use :with -.conditions • that, have. been :met..by the`;:proposed•sit'e plan. The f Hearing:, Examiner I did`.-recommend = that: the .,City 'require`: the applicant to. address those Restrictive Covenants which were imposed-'as; ;a condition-: ri,.,:;a " prior- proposal. ..,in`'::_1987 : ;.: :..The Committee the 'applicant, under .:separate cover, :' has .: formally :.`requested;.:that;the Council :rescind:'these :covenants. :.:.that '•matter;:was .not:;;announced:,"as : an -,agenda ,'it,em: for this. 'meeting",' ;; it :was'.not' considered :at-.this dime :: :The .;-Committee.. recommends:'Sthat'.;;the Council `;reverse the". decision '-of . :' the"' Hearin Examiner`,and "approve ;-the ::Site 'Phan;withy _the::following ;Conditions of the ::Hear.ing :Examiner's. Alternate Recommendationi r AL • PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE July 8, 1996 • • • 1 . The applicant shall comply with the Conditions imposed by the ERa. V . 6. The applicant shall receive the appropriate approvals to connect to the sewer systems of the Bryn Mawr Service District. • 7 . The applicant shall provide a combination of stairway and level path on the South side of the driveway to link the complex to Rainier. 8 . The applicant shall provide an emergency access roadway that links the parking aisles from Building E to Building G, to . the -rear of Building E, F and G. It shall be gated at both ends to prevent improper parking or blockage • The Committee further -recommends that the Council impose a revised Condition .#4 :aS•s. follows Unless a noise study',denionstrateS satisfaction of the City of . Renton •Building ,seivices:,-:<Di;ssion that -:special • • Window installation is not , reasonably warranted, in :order to inhibit interior noise levels stemming from Renton Airport noise, the residential windows that :have an unobstructed ',View of the Airport' s runway shall be made of either ',(a).„-: doublet-pane glass with the outer pane , _ having -a minimum ;:cthickness of 1/4- inch /..and the • inner pane having a miniimitiO.:thickness. of 3/16ths ;.f;of an inch, or (b) materials having an equivalent or better sound resistivity. ;- • - - Note: . Conditions 2 -arid 5 were not imposed as they. were . moot . . ' - . • . , - • Kathy olker-Wheeler, • Chair , - • : • R n y ;Co an, Vice-Chair . , • Timothy:.S Memb ; , • , • • • ; • , . . _ , _ . • • • • RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting July 1, 1996 Council Chambers Monday, 7:30 p.m. Municipal Building MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF TONI NELSON, Council President; BOB EDWARDS; RANDY CORMAN; COUNCILMEMBERS TIMOTHY SCHLITZER; KING PARKER; DAN CLAWSON; KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER. PRESS Charmaine Adsero, Renton Reporter CITY STAFF IN JESSE TANNER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Executive Assistant to the ATTENDANCE Mayor; ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney; MARILYN PETERSEN, City Clerk; MICHAEL KATTERMANN, Planning & Technical Services Director; DEPUTY CHIEF DON PERSSON, Police Department. APPROVAL OF MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES THE MINUTES OF JUNE 24, 1996, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are accepted by one motion which follows the listing. Appointment Civil Mayor Tanner appointed James E. Phelan, 2401 NE 24th St., Renton, 98056, Service Commission to the Civil Service Commission to complete the unexpired six-year term ending 12/31/98 of Gerald Nichols, who resigned. Refer to Community Services Committee. CAG: 96-082, Houser Way City Clerk reported bid opening on 6/26/96 for CAG-96-082, Houser Way Resurfacing/Street Resurfacing and 1996 Street Overlay project; two bids; engineer's estimate Overlay, M.A. Segale $363,312.20; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, M.A. Segale, Inc., in the total amount of $320,874.65. Council concur. Appeal: Renton Crown City Clerk submitted appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision on the Renton Apartments Site Approval, Crown Apartments L.L.C. site approval, 106 apartment units on approximately Rainier Ave N, SA-96- 7.57 acres in the 800 block of Rainier Ave. N., appeal filed on 6/20/96 by 038 David L. Halinen, 10500 NE 8th St., Bellevue, 98004, representing the applicant (File No. SA-96-038). Refer to Planning & Development Committee. (See page 262 for related correspondence.) Personnel: Third Party Human Resources & Risk Management Department recommended renewal of Claims Administrator, the contract with Giesy, Greer & Gunn, Inc., to provide third party claims Giesy, Greer & Gunn, administration for the City's property and casualty insurance program in 1996. CAG-96- Refer to Finance Committee. Personnel: Changes & Human Resources & Risk Management Department recommended a partial Modifications to Planning reorganization of the Planning & Technical Services Division to eliminate the & Technical Services Special Projects Section. The reorganization entails reclassifying a Principal Division Personnel Planner (grade 32) to a Senior Planner (grade 23); reclassifying an Assistant Planner (grade 15) to an Associate Planner (grade 19); and splitting one Associate Planner position in half, with 0.5 FTE being transferred to the Technical Services section to bring a half-time Engineering Specialist I position up to full time. Refer to Finance Committee. July 1, 1996 enton City Council Minutes Page 262 II Personnel: City's Human Resources & Risk Management Department submitted recommendation Healthcare Plan Changes from the Health Benefits Task Force for various changes and modifications to ' & Modifications the City's healthcare plan at an estimated annual cost of $12,810. The changes and modifications concern sealants, orthotics, the mail order prescription program, mental and nervous provisions and hearing aids. Refer to Finance Committee. CAG: 96-, King County Water Utility Division submitted proposed agreement with King County Water Water District No. 90, District No. 90 for a temporary emergency intertie for the provision of water, Temporary Emergency if needed, while the City's Highlands elevated water reservoir is out of service Water Service for maintenance for approximately 30 days beginning the second week of July. Council concur. (See page 263 for resolution.) MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from David L. Halinen, 10500 NE 8th St., Suite Citizen Comment: Halinen 1900, Bellevue, 98004, representing Delores Kohl Christianson and Ivan - Renton Crown Christianson, owners of Renton Crown Apartments, requesting that the Apartments Site Approval covenants previously recorded on this site (File No. R-86-102) be released. Appeal, Rainier Ave N, MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL SA-96-038 REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE in conjunction with the appeal received on this matter. Responding to Councilman Corman's inquiry, the City Clerk reported that the letter from SE 4th Street area residents regarding unsightly vehicle parking had been forwarded to administrative staff. She added that July 3, 1996 was the deadline for a response. OLD BUSINESS Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Schlitzer presented a report Transportation (Aviation) regarding an alley dedication to widen the alley between Park and Garden Committee Avenues North, from North 2nd to 3rd Streets. Acceptance of the dedication Streets: Alley Dedication widens an existing non-conforming alley from five feet to ten feet where the (between Park & Garden abutting owners voluntarily dedicated the necessary width. The existing alley from N 2nd to N 3rd) is paved in a ten-foot width except adjoining the northerly parcel where it is paved at eight feet in width. The use of the alley has been continuous, and it has been maintained at this width for many years. One of the neighbors requested that the City formalize the record and remove the alley encroachment from the property. The Committee recommended Council approve the dedications, and authorize the Mayor to accept the deeds. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation: Transit Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Schlitzer recommended that the i Advisory Board Mayor and City Clerk execute a resolution establishing a Transit Advisory Board whose purpose is to advise the Mayor and City Council on matters pertaining to the planning and implementation of the City's Transit Program. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 263 for resolution.) HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. A Professional Service Corporation David L. Halinen,P.E. Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building (206)443-4684 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Fax(206)646-3467 Bellevue,Washington 98004 CITY OF RENTON JUN 2 0 1996 RECEIVE[) CITY CLERK'S OFFICE June 20, 1996 HAND-DELIVERED Renton City Council 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: The Site of the Proposed "Renton Crown Apartments" REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF COVENANTS Dear Council Members: I am writing on behalf of the owners of the site of the proposed Renton Crown Apartments on Rainier Avenue, namely Delores Kohl Christianson and Ivan Christianson as Trustees for Kohl Excavating, Inc. Employees Profit Sharing Plan and Kohl Excavating, Inc. Employees Pension Plan in regard to certain of the subject parcels of land and Ivan F. Christianson and Delores T. Kohl Christianson, husband and wife, as to certain of the other subject parcels of land. On their behalf, I hereby request that you take official action to authorize and direct the release of the covenants set forth under instruments recorded under King County Recording Nos. 8710220434, 8710220435 and 8710220436 (copies enclosed). Please note that the site owners (along with site plan approval applicant Renton Crown Apartments L.L.C., a Washington limited liability company) filed a Notice of Appeal today in response to the Hearing Examiner's June 6, 1996 decision to not approve the proposed site plan under Renton File No. LUA-096-038, SA. The reasons for this request for release of covenants are set forth on portions of pages 8 through 10 of the Notice of Appeal. My clients ask that you take prompt action concerning both this request and the processing of the above-referenced appeal of the Examiner's Decision. Renton Crown Apartments L.L.C. is still hoping to commence construction this summer notwithstanding the undue delays caused by the Examiner's site plan review decision. Note that, on the face of the covenants, no beneficial interest holder is stated and the City of Renton is never mentioned as having any authority to enforce the covenants. Accordingly, the property owners believe that they have the right to unilaterally rescind the covenants. Nevertheless, the property owners are making the above-stated request for an express release of r' Renton City Council June 20, 1996 Page 2 the covenants by the City in order to avoid any controversy. However, in doing so, the property owners hereby respectfully reserve their rights to rescind them unilaterally. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. David L. Halinen Enclosures cc: Ivan F. Christianson and Delores T. Kohl Christianson Mark Lundberg Mayor Jesse Tanner (with copy of enclosures) Jay Covington, Assistant to the Mayor (with copy of enclosures) Susan Carlson, City of Renton Economic Development Director (with copy of enclosures) Gregg Zimmerman, Director (with copy of enclosures) City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor (with copy of enclosures) City of Renton Department of Building/Planning/Public Works Mark Pywell, Senior Planner (with copy of enclosures) City of Renton Department of Building/Planning/Public Works Neil Watts, P.E., Development Review Engineer (with copy of enclosures) City of Renton Department of Building/Planning/Public Works i�rtlRitil'. h"•':.:S.nh i�� +MS�8Q7+e.a+a:Orr4Y..w.^l�':a. _ 'n.v.� '.i - r. .r. w-• - �. ... • ` J • COVENANT Applicant, KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. , has petitioned the City of Renton to rezone a certain parcel of land contiguous 'with the subject site, located on the West side of Rainier Avenue North, at the 800 to 850 block. City of Renton reference number R0-103- • tr 8v. The st,bject site is legally described as set out on Exhibit 0 "A", attached hereto Pond inernnratari by this rcf cncc. • `? As part of that application, KCBL EXCAVATING, INC. , hereby covenants: .■i 1. The only ingress and egress from the site described on Q0 Exhibit "A" shall be restricted to Rainier Avenue North. 2. To refrain from future development in the greenbelt area, legally described as set out in Exhibit "C• , a techel hereto and incorpu:atch uy •tnis reference, 1nsviN4 es the greenbelt area extends into„_the lubject site. 3. To refrain from-future development in that area of the site above the 70 foot contour line, even insofar as that may extend beyond the greenbelt area described in #2 above. This Covenant is given with the_ un erstanding that the term - • 'development" does not include landscaping, catch basins , existing swail,, or existing pipes. These Covenants shall run with the land. DATED: October /4 , 1987. KOHL EXCAVATING. INC. By t1 CA I t S (3)%40(14.e.(r•,Ld J5. :10:1Q./16/87 e7/10'22 *O434 e • • of+;G F 9.00 _ . . CALM=L w**„*9.00 c 11• NriariN::Y<i : i• LAW - 1VU St. , P.O. E3ox 623, Beciton, WA ef.:057 , ' .. • . FARCEL "A" RAINIER AVENUE EXCAVATION SITE • • That portion of Blocks 36 and 39, of Bryn Mawr Addition as filed in Volume . 5 of plats , page 58 , records of King „County , Washington , and of the Vacated streets and. alleys • adjoining, - • `• described as follows: - • Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 9, Block 36, of said Plat ; thence S02°00'53"W along the East line of said Lot 9 a distance of 50.00 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 7 of said • Block 36; thence S87°07 '07"E along the North line of raid Lot 7 and along its Westerly extension,• a distance of 145 feet, more or less , to the Westerly margin of Rainier Avenue ; thence • Southeasterly along said Westerly margin 353 feet more or lass . to the South line of the NW 1/4 of Section 7 , To reship 23 North, vie Range 5 East, W.M. , being the centerline of vacated South 120th . A Street; thence Westerly along said centerline 405 feet, sore or less, to the centerline of vacated 89th Avenue South; thence Si NO2 00 53 W along said centerline 520 feet, more or less d to the centerline of vacated South 118th Street ; thence S87 0/ 07' E v't along said centerline 150 feet, more or less, to the 'lortherly is extension the East line r•* tr•r 17, Rlock 1 sti • e Plat h R t ..i3c:c S02"00'53"W along the Nirtherly .:xtersion and along the East line • of Pr“,- T 17 a ri tancc• ;.f 130 £ L . ..*Ole uC lire's , to the Northwest ccl-nor of Lot 9 pf said Block; thence S87°07'07"E along said North line 30.00 feet to the Northeast corner of Rai.i Lnt a ' and the point of beginning„- . • • • • • • Ea6; ' A' • �--- _ _.____.�..�.,.............r,.,., , •••-"`;r PARCEL "B" RAINIER AVENUE EXCA1'ATION SITE That portion of Blocks 35, 36, 39, and 40, of Bryn Mawr Addition as filed in. Volume 5 of_ plats, page 58, records of King County, Washington, .and of the vacated streets and'-all-eye adjoining, • described as follows: RPvl.,,r.i.n•• at the Northwest corner of Lot 12, Block 40 of said • t'iat; thence N87°07'07"W along the southerly boundary of Lots 22, 23 , end 24,' of said Block 40, and along their westerly extension, 53.00 feet to the centerline of the vacated alley adjoining said Lot 24; thence NO2°00'53"E along the centerline of said alley '!S' 100 .00 feet to the Southerly margin of vacated South 119th -Street: thence .,ortherly across said. Street 60.00 feet to the • ' centerline of the vacated alley adjoining Lot 9, Block 35 of said plat; thence NO2°00'53"E along said centerline 100.00 feet to the to the Westerly extension of the North line of Lot 9, Block 35 of said plat; thence S87°07'07"E along said• Westerly extension and along the North line of Lots 9,'0, 11 and 12 of said Blcce. 128.00 rk feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 20, Block 35, of said plat; QD thence NO2°00'53"E alnap the want line of sal r! T.r+t 20 nad alc,i its Northerly extension 130.00 feet to the centerline of vacated South 1 1 st—h r treet: thence S87 .17'07"E along the cei,Let i ioe of -veomtec' Such 11P.rh Street 150.00 feet to the centerline of vacated 87t1-1 Avenue South; thence S02°0O ' 53"W along Ae1d centerline 520.00 feet, more or less, to the South line of the NW 1/4 of Section 7, Township-.23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , being the centerline of vacated,.South 120th Street; thence Westerly along said centerline 180 "feet, more or less, to the Southerly • extension of the Weat .,line: of Lot 12, Block 40 of said plat; thency Northerly along the ,southerly extension and along the West line of said Lot I2 a distance of 130 feet, more _r less, to the point of beginning. - • • • • • �c►,; 6'Ic8' .,�..,...._b.....�.. • . . LEGAL DESCRIPTION GREENBELT AREA RAINIER AVENUE EXCAVATION SITE That portion of Blocks 30 , 35 , 36 , 39, and 40, Jf Bryn Mawr Addition as filed in Volume S of plate, page 58, records of King . .. • County , Washington , and of the vacated streets and alleys adjoining, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 12, Block 40 of said plat; thence N87°07'07"W along the southerly boundary of Lots 22, 23, and 24, of said Block 40, and along their westerly extension, 98.00 faet to the centerline of the vacated alley adjoining said Lot 24; thence NO2 00 53"E along the centerline of said alley 1Ofl .O0 feet to the Southerly margin of vacated South 119th .� Street; thence northerly across said Street 60.00 feet to the c-"nteriine of the vacated alley adjoining Lot 9, Block 35 of °aid' Qplat; theaee NO2°00'53"E along said centerliue 200.00 feet to the O,t southerly margin of South 118th Street; thence S87°07'07"E along said southerly margin 8.00 feet to the north.ede corner or Lot CP 24 , Block 35, of said plat ; thence NO2°00.53"E along the ,d Northerly extension or the West lino of said Lot 24 a distance of 30.00 feet to the centerline of South 118th Street- tht.lee h eeV3e7le7"r n;ort the centerline el vaeace3 South 118th Street f.!w:t.'i feet to the southerly extension of the West lire of Lot 13, Blee .30 of said Flat; thence NO2°00'53"E along the southerly extension and along the West line of said Lot 13 a distance of 130 . 00 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot ; thence S87°07'07"E 'along the north-line of Lots 13, 14, 15, end 16, end along their easterly extension 150.00 feet to the centerline of vacated 89th Ave. South thence S02°00'53"W along said centerline 7.00 feet; thence S49d25'00"W 219.00 feet; thence S30°00'00"W 150.00 feet, thence S03°55'00"E 90.00 feet; thence S16°00'0O"E 111.00 feet; thence S39°45'00"E 56.50 feet; thence N80°30'00"E 114.50 feet; thence S87°07'07"E 278.5 feet; thence S58°45'00"E 79.00 feet; thence N73°05'00"E 50.5 feet, more or less, to the Westerly margin of Reinter Avenue; , thence Southeasterly along said Westerly margin 134 feet, more or less, to ':`�e South line of the NW 1/4 of erection 7, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , being the c terline of vacated South 120th Street; thence Westerly along said centerline 582 feet, more or less, to the Southerly extension of the West line of Lot 12, block 40 of said plat; thence Northerly along the Southerly extension and along the West line of said Lot 12 a distance of 130 feat to the point of beginning. E VOA, #. ` C. . 4011* PARCEL "D" RAINIER AVENUE EXCAVATION SITE Vr That portion of Blocks 30, 35 and 36, of Bryn Mawr Addition as • Filed in Volume 5 of plats , page 58,-...records of King County, Washington, anal of the vacated streets and alleys adjoining , described as follows: • Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot. 9, 9locx 36, of said Plat; thence S02°00' 53"W along the East line of said Lot 9 a distance of 50.00 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 7 of said Block 36; thence S87°07'07"E along the North line of said Lot land along its Westerly extension a ,` distance of 145 fee' , more or less ,to the Westerly margin of r: Rainier Avenue; thence. Northwesterly elo.ig said Westerly margin ' 180 feet, more or less. to the centerline of vseated South 118th C Street; thence Westorly along said centerline 136 feet, more or less , to the Northerly extension of the East line of Lot 17 , '�..` Block 36 , of said plat; thence Southerly along the Northerly extension and along thA .:Apt line of eeid Lot 17 a 3iarance of E 130 teec, more orless, to the Northwest corner of Lot 9, of said :,t_ �1_; thence S87°07 07��E along said North line 30.00 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 9 aad the point of beginning. TOGETHER WITH Lots 13, 14, 15, and 16, Block 30,. of said Flat, and together +rith that portion of thrr WR'sr half of. Vacated 89th Av_v,.e South adjoining aaLd :.7.t.. on tho vast, and to:tet er with the North half of vaented South 1lbth Street 0djoining said vacated 89th Avcuue L)Le U1, Liu:. TOGETHER WITH Lots 21, 223, and 24, of Block 35 of said .Plat, ` and together with the East half of vacated alley adjoining Lot 24 on the West and the South half of vacated South 118th Street adjoining 'said Lots on the North. • _ • ' . i - • COVENANTS KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. , seeks. ai.nexation and rezone of a • certain parcel of land on the border of.s City limits. City of Renton reference file ECF086-86, R- 102-86. The subject site is Ilegally described as se*. out on Exnibit "D", attached hereto and i V incrr-x�r�te�3 5v a:hi� reference. . - I cp As part of application being made to the City of Renton, • ‘74 KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. , hereby covenants: 3 0,4 1. To refrain from future develcpment in the greenbelt OD area, legally described as net out in Exhibit "C' attached f hereto and incorporated by this reference, insofar as the greenbelt area extends into the aubiect site. This Covenant,shall run with the land. i i DkTED: October . ./C. , 1907. 1 KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. Se - Its O f ti J CZ • •" J 3r2 5 :Q9:.] J16/87 . � - • .. •, �-= l 2n *0435. a . RECD F 9.00 1 CASHSL • *d:�a.*9.OQ 11 • a h.T'(C 'ai4i:ia AI L.'�' .1I- �( :� ':! : 1.011 S: I 1 .. . _ . . - . . . . . . . _. _ ... .. .. .1' r • • PARCEL "A" • RAINIER AVENUE EXCAVATION SITE That portion of Blocks 36 and 39, of Bryn Mawr Addition as filed in Volume 5 of plats , page 58 , records of King County , Washington, and of the vacated Streets and alleys adjoining, described as follows: • • • . -. - Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 9, Block 36, of said Plat; theice S02°00' 53"W along the East line of said Lot 9 a distance of 50.00 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 7 of said Block 36; thence S87°07'07"E along the North line of saia Lot 7 and along its Westerly extension, a distance of 145 feet, more or less ,to the Westerly margin of Rainier Avenue ; thence Southeasterly along saic' Westerly margin 353 feet, more or less, . to the South line of the NW 1/4 of Section 7, Township 23 worth, Range 5 East, W.M. , being the centerline of vacated South 120th Street; thence Westerly along said centerline 4C5 feet, more or i less,_ to the centerline of vacated 89th Avenue South; thence NO2`00'53"ii along said centerline 520 feet, more or less to the centerline of vacated South 118th Street; thence S871347 '07"E Up along said centerline 150 feet, more or less, to the Northerly extension the East line of Lot 17, Block 36, of said Plat; thence S02°OO'53"W along the ?'nrtherly extension and along the East line of said Lot 17 a distance of 130 feet, more or less , to the • Northwest corner of Lot 9 of said Block; thence S876O7'07"E along said North line 30.00 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot- 9 and the point of beginning. • • • • • i . • . PARCEL B --4,5 RAINIER AVENUE EXCAVATION SITE That portion of Blocks 35, 36, 39, and 40, of nryn Mawr Addition as filed in Volume 5 of plats, page 58, records of King County, Washington, and -of the vacated streets and alleys adjoining._ described a8 follows:- - - Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 12, Block 40 of said Plat; thence N87°O7107"W along the southerly boundary of Lots 22, 23, and 24, of said Block 40, and along their westerly extension, 98.00 feet to the centerline of the vacated alley adjoining said in Lot 24; thence NO2°O0'53"E along the centerline of said alley 9 100.00 feet to the Southerly margin of vacated South 119th y° Street; thence northerly across said Street 60.00 feet to the -Q .• centerline of.the vacated allay adjoining Lot 9',..Block 35 of said CI plat; thence NO2°00'53"E 'along said centerline 100.00 feet to the CD14 to the Westerly extension of the North line of Lot 9, Block 35 of said plat; thence S87°07'07"E along said Westerly extension and e4 along the North line of Lots 9,10, 11 and 12 of said Block 128.00 0 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 20, Block 35, of sr.id plat; thence NO2°00'53"E along the West line of said Lot 20 and along its Northerly extension 130.00 feet to the centerline of vacated South 118th Street; thence S87°07'07"E along the centerline of. vacated South 118th Street 150.00 f et to the centerline of vacated 69th Avenue South; thence SO2°00 ' 53"W along slid centerline 520.00 feet, more or less, to the South line of the NW /4 of Section 7, Township^23 North, Range 5 East, ':.M. , being 1the centerline of vacated South 120th Street; thence Westerly along said centerline 180 -feet, more or less, to the Southerly extension of the West line of Lot 12, Block 40 of said plat; thence Northerly along the:Southerly extension and along the.West line of said Lot 12 a distance of 130 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. s • • • • ''4 ` ''44^^ -- �n LEGAL DESCRIPTION GREENBEL" AREA „• RAINIER AVENUE EXCAVATION SITE ay s: That portion of Blocks 30, 35 , 36 , 39 , and 40, of Bryn Mawr Addition as filed in Volume 5 of plats, page 58,, records of King County , Waahingtorc, and of the vacated streets and el1ey`s adjoining, described as follows: • Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 12, Block 40 of said plat; thence N87 07 07 d along the southerly boundary of Lots 22, 23, and 24, of said Block 40, and along their westerly extension, 98.00 feet to the centerline of the vacated alley adjoining said Lot . 24; thence NO2''O0',3"E along the centerline of said alley 100.00 feet to the Southerly margin of vacated South 119th Street; thence northerly across., said Street 60.00 feet to the C 'ce-t rline 'of the vacated alley'adjoining Lot 9, Block 35 of. said A ply , thence NO2 00 53 E along said centerline 200.00 feet to the a soL_uerly margin of South 118th Street; thence S87°07'07"E along sale southerly margin 8.00 feet to the northwest corner of Lot c) 24 , Block 35 , of said plat ; thence NO2°00 ' 53"E along the '4 Northerly extension of the West line of said Lot 24 a distance of PD 30 .00 feet to the centerline of South 118th Street, thence S87°07'07"E along the centerline of vacated South 118th Street 120.00 feet to ,the southerly extension of the West lire of Lot .13. Block 30 of said plat; thence NO2°00'53"E along the southerly .7.3:rns:r;n and along the West line .of said Lot 13 a distance of 130 . 00 feet tc the Northwest corner of said Lot ; thence S87°07 '07"E along the north line ofiLots 13, 14, 15. and 16, and along their easterly extension 150.00 feet to the centerline of vacated 89th Ave. South. thence S02°00'53"W along said centerline 7.00 feet; thence S49 25 00 W 219.00 feet; thence S3000'00"W 150.00 feet; thence S03°55'00"E 90.00 feet; thence S16°00'00"E 111.00 feet; thence S39°45'00"E 56.50 feet; thence N80°30'00"E 114.50 feet; thence S87°07'07"E 278.5 feet; thence S58°45'00"E 79.00 feet; 'thence N73°05'00"E 50. 5 feet, more or less, to the Westerly margin of Rainier Avenue; thence Southeasterly along said Westerly margin 134 feet, more or leas, to the South line of the NW 1/4 of Section 7, Township 23 Irorth, Range 5 East, W.M. , being the centerline of vacated South 120th Street; thence Westerly along said centerline 582 feet, more or less, to the Southerly extension of the West line of Loh, 12, block 40 of said plat; thence Northerly along the Southerly extension and along the West line of said Lot 12 a distance of 130 feet to the point of 'beginning. • • • • 1,; • • - _ • + .. ;."ram • 010 • PARCEL "D" a ~ RAINIER AVENUE EXCAVATION SITE • • That portion of Blocks 30, 35 and 36, of Bryn Mawr Addition as filed in Volume 5 of plats , page 58 , records of King County, - Washington, and 'of the vacated-streets and alleys adjoining., described as follows: - . Beginning et the northeast corner of Lot 9, Block 36, of scid Platy thence SC2°00'53"W along the East line of said Lot 9 a distance of 50.00 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 7 of said Block 36; thence S87°07'07"E along the North line of said Lot • land along its Westerly extension a distance .of 145 feet, • more or less , to the Westerly margin of Rainier Avenue; thence Northwesterly along said Westerly margin 180 feet, more or less', to the 'centerline of vacated South 118th Street; thence Westerly along said centerline 13C feet, more or less, to the Northerly extension of the East line of Lot 17 , Block 36 , of said plat; thence Southerly along the Northerly y extension and along the East line of said Lot 17 a distance of V, 130 feet, more or°less,��to the Northwest corner, of Lot 9, of said Block; thence S87 07 07 E along said North line 30.00 fe-t to the CP Northeast corner of said Lot 9 and the point of beginning. 04 04 CP TOGETHER WITH tots 13, 14, 15, and 16, Block 30, of said Plat, r4 and together with that portion of the West half of Vacated • 89th r* Avenue South adjoining said Lots on the East, and together with Like #;orth half of vacs_ed South 118th Street ad joi-ing said • vacated 89th Avenue South•"and Lots on the South. TOGETHER WITH Lots 21 , 22, ,23, and 24, of Block 35 of sPid Plat, and together with the East half of vacated alley adjoining Lot 24 on the West and • the South half of vacated South 118th Street •adjoining said-•Lots on the North. • • r.✓ • COVENANTS j Applicant, KOHL EXCAVATING INC. , has petitioned the City of } : Renton to rezone property located on the West side of Rainier Avenue North at they 800 to 850 block, reference file R-103-86. j Said property is legally described as set out on Exhibit "B" , i attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. As pa: t of -that appii.,at ion , KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. , hereby' • covenants: ,{ • (1) To refrain from future development in the greenbelt area, WP t" legally described as set out in Exhibit "C" , attached hereto and , ‘1 O incorporated by this reference, insofar as the greenbel area extends 1 N into the subject site. 1 (2) The only ingress and egress from the site described on } r ' Exhibit "B", shall be restricted to the site immediately east and • w i Described on Exhibit "A" herein. t (3) The building -heights on the sight shall be limited to a maximum rooftop elevation. of 100 feet. . 1 (4) To refrain from. future development in that area of the site s 1 above the 70. foot contour line, even insofar as that may extend beyond the greenbelt area described in #1 above. This covenant is 1 given with the understanding that the term development does not include landscaping, catch basins, existing swail, or existing pipes. These Covenants shall run with the land. • DATED: ot9c. e,4a,_ J t • , 1987. KOHL EXCAVATING. INC. a ,� 1, By taieitLe 04:43&411,410.0% b /} .ic _ It^s = Y1 • +' o J5.1:1:9/16/87 • „a 1 III i:', r :r'i er7/10/22 410436 D ACC(: r 9.00 wiY CASHSL v.****4.00 C.O. 1'3+.l.; C26, 1...'1::t,1, v.,:,. .. 1 .. . r' • i, • :.. • . • PARCEL "A" RAINIER AVENUE EXCAVATION SITE • That portion of Blocks 36 and 39, of Bryn Mawr Addition as filed in Volume 5 of plats , page 58 , records of King County , Washington ,_ and Of the vacated streets end alleys adjoining, described as follows: • Beginning At the northeast corner of Lot 9, Block 36, of said Plat ; thence S02`00 '53"W along the East line of said Lot 9 a distance of 50.00 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 7 of said iP Block 36; thence S87°07 '07"E along the North line of sa.a Lot • VI 7 and along its Westerly extension, a distance of 145 feet, more or less , to the Westerly margin of Rainier Avenue ; thence CD Southeasterly along said -Westerly margin 353 feet.,,, more .or _.lass, to the South line of the' NW 1/4 of Section 7, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.V., bei:ip the centerline of vacated South 120th 104 Street; thi nce Westerly along said centerline 405 feet, more c:r r leas , �to 'the centerline of vacated 89th Avenue South; thence Ca NO2 00 53 W along said centerline 520 feet, more or less to the centerline of vacated South 118th Street; thence S87�07 ' 07"E along said centerline 150 feet, more or less, to the Northerly extension the Eaat line of Lot 17, Block 36, of said Plat; thence • 802°00'S3"W along the Northerly cx'cnsion and along the East line of said Lot 17 a distance of 130 .eet, more or less , to the •. " net' corner of Lot: ) J1 cirri., block; thence 587°07'07"E along said North line 30.00 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 9 and the point of beginning ;taw PARCEL "B" RAINIER AVENUE EXCAVATION SITE That portion of Blocks 35, 36 , 39, and 40, of Bryn Mawr Addition as filed in Volume 5 of plats, page 58, records of King County, Washington ,:' and of the vacated streets and' all%ys adjoining , described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 12, Block 43 of said Plat; thence N87°07 '07"W along the southerly boundary of Lots 22, 23, and 24, of said Block 40, and along their westerly extension, 98 ,00 feet. ►o the centerline the vacated alley .d j oining said Lot 24; thence NO2°00'53"E along the centerline of said alley 100 .00 feet to the Southerly margin of vacated South 119th Street: thence northerly across said Street 60.00 feet to the centerline of the vacated alley adjoining Lot 9, Block 35 of said plat; thence NO2°00'53"E along said centerline 100.00 feet to the to the Westerly extension of the North line of Lot 9, Block 35 of said plat; thence S87°07'07"E along said Westerly extension and t.O along the North line of Lots 9,10, 11 and 12 of said Block 128.00 Cf feat to the Southwest corner of Lot 10, Block 35, of said plat; thence NO2°O0'53"E along the West line of said Lot 20 ..ad along Z its Northerly extension 13l.00 feet to the centcrlin+. `of vacated `NI South 118th Street; cthence S87°07 '07"E .along the ce.:terline of . ..cited Louth 118th Street 150 .00 feet to the centerline .of v4 vacated 39th Avenue South; thence S02°00 ' 53"W along , said rs centerline 520.00 feet, more or leper, to the South line of the NW OD z 4 of Section 7 ; Township. 23 Ncrth, :singe 5 East. W.M. , being Ce:1tcrli no of vacaLcu .iuuUI l2Vtia otreet; rnence Westerly along said centerline 180 'feet, more or less, to the Southerly extension of the West line of Lot 12 , Block 40 of said plat; thence Northerly along the'Sautherly extension and along the West line of said Lot 12 a distance of 130 feet, more or less, to the point of beginn:.ng. - .14 LEGAL DESCRIPTION GREENBELT ALEA RAINIER AVENUE EXCAVATION SITE That portion of Blocks 30, 35 , 36 , 39 , and 40, of Bryn Mawr Ad3ition as filed in Volume 5 cf plats, page.. 58, records of King _ County , Washington , and-of the vacated streets and alleys adjoining, described as follows: beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 12, Block 40 of said plat; thence N87°07'07"W along the southerly boundary of Lots 22, 23, end 24, of said Block 40, and along their westerly extension, 98.00 feet to the centerline of the vacated alley adjoining said Lot 24; thence NO2°00'53"E along the centerline of said alley 100 .00 feet to the Southerly margin of vacated South 119th Street; thence northerly across said Street 60.00 feet to the centerline of the vacated alley adjoining Lot 9, Block 35 of said 07 plat; thence NO2°00 53 L along said centerline 200.00 feet to the southerly margin of South 118th Street; thence S87°07 'C7"E along At said southerly margir. 8.00 feet to the ncrthwe;t comer of Lot 1.6 24 , Bloc 35 , of said plat : thence NO2°00 ' 53"E along the ee Nerti,crly extenaion of the West line of said Lot 24 a diezance of 3u . uo feet to the centerline of South 118th Street ; thence ' S87°07 '07"E along the centerline of vacated South 118th Street Z20.00 feet to the southerly extension of the West line of Lot 13, Block 30 of said plat; thPnrA NO2°R0' 53"E alone the southerly cxLension and along the West line of said Lot 13- a distance of 130 . 00 feet t•n the Northweet curnCr of said tot ; thence SR7°O7'07"E along the north-line of Lote 13, 14, 15, and 16, and along their easterly extension 150.00 feet to the centerline of vacated 89th Ave. South thence S02°00'53"W along said centerline 7.00 feet; thence S49. 25'00"W 219.00 feet; thence S30°00'00"W 150.00 feet; thence S03°55'O0"E 90.00 feet; thence S16°00'0O"E 111 .00 feet; thence S39°45'00"E 56.50 feet; thence N80°30'00"E 114.50 feet; thence S87°07 '07"E 276.5 few.: : r';!c:1‹ ,., ::°45 Ct" , 79.00 feet; thence N73`05100"E 50.5 feet, more or less , to the Westerly margin of Rainier Avenue; thence Southeasterly along said Westerly margin 134 feet, more or less, to the South line of the NW 1/4 of Section 7, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , being the centerline of vacated South 120th Street ; thence Westerly along said centerline 582 feet, more or less, to the Southerly extension of the West line of Lot 12, block 40 of said plat; thence Northerly along the Southerly extension and along the West line of said Lot 12 a distance of 130 feet to the point of beginning. • WN,6 Ce PARCEL "D" RAINIER AVENUE EXCAVATION .SITE That portion of Blocks 30, 35 and 36, of Bryn Mawr Addition as • filed in Volume 5 of plats , page 58, records of King County, _ Washington , and. of the vacated streets and alleys adjoining, ' - ' described as follows: - . • . • Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 9, Block 36, of said Plat ; thence S02°00'53"W along the East line of said Lot 9 a distance of 50.00 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 7 of said • block 36; thence S87°07 '07"E along the North line of said Lot land along its Westerly extension a distance of 145 feet , more or less ,to the Westerly margin of Rainier. Avenue;. thence Northwesterly along said Westerly margin at ' 180 feet: innre 'cir less . to the ,ntpr1 i nP 'of "vAcRled South 118th c�3 Street; thence ►lcsterly along said centerline 136 feet, more or v' less , to the Northerly extension of the East line of Lot 17 , Block 36 , of said plat ; thence Southerly along the Northerly extension and along the East line of said Lot 17 a distance of 130 feet, more or leas, CO the Northwest corner of Lot 9, of said r Block; thence E87 07 '07"E along said North line 30.00 feet to the PlbNortheast corner of said Lot 5 and the point of beginning. • TOCETIER WITS! Lots Li, 14, 15, and 1C , Bl r,ck 30, of bdid Flat, • nad together with, that portion of the West half of Vacated S9rh Avenue South adjoining said LoLa on the East, and together with the ,North half of vecated,South 118th Street adjoining said vacated 89th Avenue South atd. Lots on the South. TOGETHER WITH. Lots 21 , 22, 23, and. 24. of Block 35 of said Plat, . and together with the East half of vacated alley adjoining Lot 24 on the West and the South half of vacated South 118th Street a joining said Lots on the North. • • • • • • • r . tk;b,r ,L, June 25, 1996 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) MARILYN J. PETERSEN, City Clerk for the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 25th day of June, 1996, at the hour of 5:00 p.m your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail to all parties of record, notice of appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision filed by David L. Halinen; Representating Renton Crown Apartments L. L. C., site approval, (SA-96- 038). Marilyn . tersen, CMC, City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 25th day of June 1996. isa tephe No ary Public in and for t St to of Washington, residing in L V l l y L L L a L C 600 Market Place, #1 2003 Western Avenue Seattle, WA 98121 Mark Pywell Neil Watts Steve Leitzke Carol Geiger 6102 142nd Avenue SE 11914 87th Avenue S Bellevue, WA 98006 Seattle, WA 98178 Robert Levinson Laura Baggett 1805 136th Place NE, #201 11225 84th Avenue S Bellevue, WA 98005 Seattle, WA 98178 David Halinen 10500 NE 8th, #1900 Bellevue, WA 98004 Patricia Jarvis PO Box 1056 Renton, WA 98057 Mike Meyer 8731 S 117th Place Seattle, WA 98178 Chris Feldt 11908 87th Avenue S Seattle, WA 98178 James W. Spears 8735 117th Place S Seattle, WA 98178 Wallace Morgan 11900 87th Avenue S Seattle WA 98178 Ethel:.Woodward - 8816 S 122nd Street Seattle, WA 98178 ;yam CIT�c OF.RENTON _. City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor • - Marilyn J.Petersen • June 24, 1996 APPEAL FILED BY: David L. Halinen; Representative.for Renton Crown Apartments L. L. C. RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision on June 6, 1996, File No'. SA-96-038 - To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the •hearing examiner's decision on the Renton Crown Apartments L. L. C. site approval has been filed with the City Clerk. In accordance with Renton,Municipal Code Section 4-8-16.B., within five days of receipt , of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. - NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeals and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee. The Council Secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish to attend the meeting, please call the.Council Secretary at 235-2586 any weekday after 1:00 pm (except Friday) for information. The recommendation of the Committee will be presented for consideration by the full Council at a subsequent,Council meeting. Attached is a copy of the Renton Municipal Code regarding appeals of Hearing Examiner decisions or recommendations: Please note that the City Council will be considering th'e .merits of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a showing can be made-that additional evidence could not reasonably have been available at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. For additional information or assistance, please feel free to call. . . '. Sincerely, • Marilyn J et :sen, CMC City Clerk • .' Attachment • • 200 Mill Avenue South =,Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2501 HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL. JUN 2 0 1996 FILE NO. LUA-096-038,SA APPLICATION NAME: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS Site Plan Approval Applicatib'ilTY CLERK'S OFFICE The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the decision or recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated June 6 - 19 96 1. IDENTIFICATION OF'PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) Name: RENTON. CROWN APARTMENTS L.L:C. , et al Name: David L. Halinen Address: 704 N. E. Northlake Way • Address: 10500 NE 8th, Suite 1900 Seattle, Wa. 98105 Bellevue, Wa. 98004 Telephone No. 206-547-4162 Telephone No. _ 206-443-4684 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDING OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's report) No. Error: SEE ATTACHED NOTICE OF APPEAL (10 pages) . Correction: CONCLUSIONS: • • No. Error: SEE ATTACHED NOTICE OF APPEAL. ' Correction: • OTHER • No. Error: SEE ATTACHED NOTICE OF APPEAL. L Correction: 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) X Reverse the decision or recommendation and grant the following relief: SEE ATTACHED NOTICE OF _ Modify the decision or recommendation as follows: APPEAL. Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: • Other • P • ci , June .20, 1996 Appellant epresentative�ign ture Date NOTE: Please refer to Title IV, Chapter 8, of, the Renton Municipal Code, and Section 4-8-16, for specific appeal procedures. June 26, 1995 heappeal.doc/forms city of Renton City Code Title IV -Building Chapter 8 -Hearing Examiner it Section 16 - Appeal 4-9-16: APPEAL: Unless an ordinance providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review•thereof by.the Superior Court, any interested party aggrieved by the Examiner's written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Clerk upon a form furnished b •the City Clerk, within,fourteen (14)„calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with the fee schedule of the City. A. The written notice of appe shall fully, clearly and thoroughly specify the substantial error(s) in fact or law which in b' the record of the proceedings from which the appellant seeks relief. Facsimile filing of a notice of appeal is authorized pursuant to the conditions etailed in Renton City Code Section 4-8-11C. (Ord. 4353, 6-1-92). 1 B. Within five (5) days of rec ipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. Other parties f record:may submit letters in support of their positions within ten (10) days of the dates of mailing of the notification f the filing of the notice of appeal. I I • C. Thereupon the Clerk shall orward to the members of the City,Council all of the pertinent documents, including the written decision or reco endation, findings and conclusions contained in the Examiner's report, the notice of appeal, II and additional letters submitted by the parties. 1 D. No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new nor additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by' • the City Council unless a s owing is made by the party offering the'evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the ime of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that''additibnal evidence is ;a required, the Council may emand the matter to the Examiner for reconsideration. The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the appellant. In the absence of any entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony,!it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council, and that thel record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing xaminer. I I _ • i E. The consideration by the C ty Council shall be based solely upon the record, the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal and pp additional su missions by parties. 11 1 F. If, upon appeal of a decisio of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to Section 4-8-10A and after examination of the record, e Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, it may remand the proceeding to xaminer for reconsideration, or modify, or reverse the decision of the,Examiner accordingly. +, G. If, upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to Section 4-8- • lOB or C, and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law.exists'in the record, or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified, the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration, or enter its own decision upon the application pursuant to Section 4-8-1OB or C. H. In any event, the decison of the city Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be `supported • by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord. 3658,'9-13-82) heappeal.doc/forms 1 2 3 4 5 6 BEFORE THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL 7 8 9 Regarding the RENTON CROWN ) 10 APARTMENTS Site Plan Approval Application ) ) NOTICE OF APPEAL 11. ) 12 Renton File No. LUA-096-038, SA ) 13 COME NOW the actual Site Plan Approval applicant, RENTON CROWN 14 APARTMENTS L.L.C., a Washington limited liability company,' and the owners of the subject 15 16 property, DELORES KOHL CHRISTIANSON and IVAN CHRISTIANSON as Trustees for 17 KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PROFIT SHARING PLAN and KOHL 18 EXCAVATING,INC.EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN in regard to certain of the subject parcels 19 of land and IVAN F. CHRISTIANSON and DELORES T.KOHL CHRISTIANSON, husband and 20 wife, as to certain other of the subject parcels of land, and, for the reasons set forth below, appeal 21 the Renton Hearing Examiner's June 6, 1996 decision to not approve the proposed site plan. 22 23 24 25 lTn submitting the original site plan application as applicant,The Leitzke Architects,the project architect, served as agent for the actual applicant,Renton Crown Apartments..L.L_C_ HALINEN LAW OFFICES,P.S. NOTICE OF APPEAL--Page 1 A Professional Service Corporation Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Bellevue,Washington 98004 (206)454-8272 1 SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS 2 I. CONTRARY TO EXAMINER'S CONCLUSION 8, THE COMPREHENSIVE 3 PLAN AND THE SITE'S CA ZONING EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZE THE PROPOSED MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE OF THE SUBJECT 4 PROPERTY. 5 Conclusion 8 of the Hearing Examiner's Decision states in part that "using the CA's 6 `secondarily' permitted uses to sidestep both the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning code is 7 inappropriate." (Emphasis added.) That statement is illogical. No "sidestepping" is involved with 8 9 the proposed multi-family residential development because both the subject site's Comprehensive 10 Plan Land Use designation (Employment Area Commercial--EAC) and the subject site's zoning 11 classification(Arterial Commercial--CA) explicitly authorize stand-alone multifamily residential 12 development. In that regard, note that Comprehensive Plan Policy LU-171 states: 13 Residential uses in the Employment Area - Commercial designation may be 14 a single use development and should be limited to a maximum density of 20 du/acre.2 15 16 (Emphasis added.) Likewise, under the Permitted Uses subsection of the CA zone (RMC 4-31- 17 10.4), the portion dealing with Multi-Family Residential uses states: 18 B. Permitted Uses: 19 20 * 21 22 2Note that Policy LU-173 states: 23 Single family development should not be allowed in this (Employment Area - Commercial) designation. 24 Accordingly,in view of Policy LU-171,the residential uses to which Policy LU-171 applies must be multi-family 25 residential uses. HALINEN LAW OFFICES,P.S. NOTICE OF APPEAL--Page 2 A Professional Service Corporation Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Bellevue,Washington 98004 (206)454-8272 1 * 2 2. Secondary Uses 3 * 4 * * 5 6 b. Multi-Family Residential: Multi-family residential are [sic]permitted subject to the following conditions: 7 (1)Maximum density shall be twenty(20) dwelling units per 8 acre. 9 (2) Multi-family residential uses located in a structure 10 that is restricted solely to residential uses shall be subject to the development standards as specified in the Multi- 11 Family Zone, Community Center, (MF-C), Section 4-31-8D 12 of Chapter 31, Title IV, of the City Code. 13 * * 14 (Emphasis added.) 15 16 Note that, in contrast to"conditional uses", there are two types of"Permitted Uses" in the 17 Renton Zoning Code: "primary uses" and"secondary uses". The definition of"secondary uses" 18 as set forth in RMC 4-31-2 states: 19 SECONDARY USES: Land uses permitted within a zone subject to conditions 20 specified in the applicable section for that zone and designed to make the uses compatible with primary uses. Secondary uses will generally comprise a smaller 21 proportion of the total uses in the zone. Secondary uses are not subject to requirements different from those that apply to primary uses except as 22 provided in this Zoning Code. 23 (Emphasis added.) In other words, (1) the secondary use provisions of the zone classification in 24 25 which a parcel of land is located set forth the specific conditions that make the secondary uses HALINEN LAW OFFICES,P.S. NOTICE OF APPEAL--Page 3 A Professional Service Corporation Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Bellevue,Washington 98004 (206)454-8272 1 compatible with primary uses and (2) secondary uses are to be treated no differently than primary 2 uses except for those specific conditions.' This being the case, the only"sidestepping" going on 3 with respect to the subject site plan review application is the Examiner's wholly improper attempt 4 5 to sidestep the crystal-clear meaning of above-quoted LU-171 and RMC 4-31-10.4.B.2.b. in 6 refusing to approve the proposed site plan on zoning grounds. 7 The impropriety of the Examiner's Conclusion 8 and his decision to not approve the site 8 plan is made all the more striking by the broadly-publicized Local Permit Process adopted by the 9 1995 Washington Legislature as part of Engrossed Substitute House Bill (ESHB) 1724. That 10 process is a statewide legal requirement. Please note the following excerpts from ESHB 1724 as 11 12 codified under RCW 36.70B.030 and 36.70B.040: 13 RCW 36.70B.030 Project review--Required elements--Limitations. 14 (1) Fundamental land use planning choices made in adopted comprehensive plans and development regulations shall serve as the foundation 15 for project review. The review of a proposed project's consistency with 16 applicable development regulations, or in the absence of applicable regulations the adopted comprehensive plan, under RCW 36.70B.040 shall incorporate the 17 determinations under this section. 18 (2) During project review, a local government or any subsequent 19 reviewing body shall determine whether the items listed in this subsection are defined in the development regulations applicable to the proposed project or, 20 in the absence of applicable regulations the adopted comprehensive plan. At a minimum,such applicable regulations or plans shall be determinative of the: 21 22 23 'The definition's comment that"[s]econdary uses will generally comprise a smaller proportion of the tota'. 24 uses in the zone"is not regulatory in nature but appears to be merely the City Council's general assumption in 25 adopting the Zoning Code as to how such uses will likely develop throughout each zone citywide rather than or. a parcel-by-parcel basis. HALINEN LAW OFFICES,P.S. NOTICE OF APPEAL--Page 4 A Professional Service Corporation Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Bellevue,Washington 98004 (206)454-8272 1 (a) Type of land use permitted at the site, including uses that may be 2 allowed under certain circumstances, such as planned unit developments and conditional and special uses, if the criteria for their approval have been 3 satisfied; 4 (b) Density of residential development in urban growth areas; and 5 (c) Availability and adequacy of public facilities identified in the 6 comprehensive plan, if the plan or development regulations provide for funding of these facilities as required by chapter 36.70A RCW. 7 8 (3) During project review,the local government or any subsequent reviewing body shall not reexamine alternatives to or hear appeals on the items 9 identified in subsection(2) of this section, except for issues of code interpretation. As part of its project review process, a local government shall provide a procedure 10 for obtaining a code interpretation as provided in RCW 36.70B.110. 11 * 12 * 13 (5) Nothing in this section limits the authority of a permitting agency to 14 approve, condition, or deny a project as provided in its development regulations 15 adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW and in its policies adopted under RCW 43.21C.060. Project review shall be used to identify specific project design and 16 conditions relating to the character of development, such as the details of site plans, curb cuts, drainage swales, transportation demand management, the payment 17 of impact fees, or other measures to mitigate a proposal's probable adverse 18 environmental impacts, if applicable. 19 (6) Subsections (1) through (4) of this section apply only to local governments planning under RCW 36.70A.040. 20 21 RCW 36.70B.040 Determination of consistency. 22 (1) A proposed project's consistency with a local government's 23 development regulations adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, or, in the absence of applicable development regulations, the appropriate elements of the 24 comprehensive plan or subarea plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW shall be 25 determined by consideration of: HALINEN LAW OFFICES,P.S. NOTICE OF APPEAL--Page 5 A Professional Service Corporation Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Bellevue,Washington 98004 (206)454-8272 1 (a) The type of land use; 2 (b) The level of development, such as units per acre or other measures 3 of density; 4 (c) Infrastructure,including public facilities and services needed to serve 5 the development; and 6 (d) The character of the development, such as development standards. 7 (2) In determining consistency, the determinations made pursuant 8 to RCW 36.70B.030(2)shall be controlling. 9 (3) For purposes of this section, the term "consistency" shall include all terms used in this chapter and chapter 36.70A RCW to refer to performance in 10 accordance with this chapter and chapter 36.70A RCW, including but not limited to compliance, conformity, and consistency. 11 12 (4) Nothing in this section requires documentation, dictates an agency's procedures for considering consistency, or limits a unit of government from asking 13 more specific or related questions with respect to any of the four main categories listed in subsection (1)(a)through(d) of this section. 14 (Emphasis added.) Obviously, the Examiner blatantly violated these state statutory provisions by 15 16 refusing to (1) recognize the straightforward statements of policy LU-171 and the above-quoted 17 CA zoning provisions and (2) have them serve as the foundation for project review as the statutes 18 demand. 19 20 II. THE EXAMINER'S CONTENTION IN CONCLUSION 1 THAT"THE PROPOSED USE IN NOT COMPATIBLE IN THIS LOCATION IN THIS ZONE" IS 21 IMPROPER DURING SITE PLAN REVIEW BECAUSE IT IS AN ATTEMPT TO 22 REEXAMINE THE MERITS OF THE USES PERMITTED UNDER THE APPLICABLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING CODE PROVISIONS 23 RATHER THAN TO APPLY THOSE PROVISIONS TO THE PROJECT APPLICATION AT HAND. 24 25 HALINEN LAW OFFICES,P.S. NOTICE OF APPEAL--Page 6 A Professional Service Corporation Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Bellevue,Washington 98004 (206)454-8272 1 In Conclusion 1, the Hearing Examiner misconceives his role in the local permitting process. 2 After quoting and summarizing various specific criteria for reviewing a site plan under RMC 4-31- 3 33.D.1, the Examiner makes the bald assertion that "[t]he proposed use is not compatible in this 4 5 location in this zone and the site plan is not approved." This assertion amounts to an attempt by 6 the Examiner to usurp the legislative function of the City Council. As is clear from the previous 7 section of this Notice of Appeal, the Examiner violated state law by reexamining the propriety of 8 the permitted uses that have been established for the subject property by virtue of its EAC 9 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation and CA zoning. (See RCW 36.70B.030(3), which 10 is set forth on page 5, above.) Instead of engaging in such a statutorily prohibited effort, the 11 12 Examiner should have simply recognized that, when reviewing a site plan application like the one 13 that was before him in this case, he was statutorily bound to accept the permitted uses set forth in 14 the site's already-adopted Comprehensive Plan land use designation and zoning classification as the 15 foundation for project review. (See RCW 36.70B.030(1), which is set forth on page 4, above.) 16 Because the Examiner failed to do that, the Examiner's Conclusion 1 is contrary to law. 17 18 III. THE EXAMINER'S CONCLUSIONS 3 THROUGH 7 RADICALLY 19 MISREPRESENT THE SITE'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING SITUATION. 20 In Conclusions 3 through 7, the Hearing Examiner radically misrepresents the situation 21 concerning the Comprehensive Plan and zoning situation concerning the subject site. As to 22 23 Conclusion 3, even assuming (for the sake of argument) that the Examiner is correct in his 24 contention that"[t]he primary purpose of both the old B-1 and newer CA zones is to allow land for 25 HALINEN LAW OFFICES,P.S. NOTICE OF APPEAL--Page 7 A Professional Service Corporation Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Bellevue,Washington 98004 (206)454-8272 i 1 commercial uses such as retail and services," such a primary purpose is totally irrelevant because, 2 as proven above, the CA zone explicitly authorizes multi-family residential developments. 3 Conclusion 4's suggestion that"the applicant either failed to request consideration of multiple family 4 5 residential uses or failed to convince the planning commission or the City Council to designate this 6 particular site for multiple family residential purposes" makes absolutely no sense because the 7 Council amended the CA zone text to allow stand-alone multifamily projects in the CA zone 8 citywide when it passed Ordinance 4513 on May 1, 1995. Conclusion 5 makes no sense for the 9 same reason. As to Conclusion 6,the Airport Manager's opinion as to the wisdom of the proposed 10 use is totally irrelevant to the site plan review at hand because the use is explicitly authorized by 11 12 both the site's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation and zoning classification. Likewise 13 irrelevant to the site plan review decision are the location of Rainier Avenue and the existence of 14 the small commercial office development to the north of the site. Conclusion 7 amounts to a 15 criticism of the CA zoning text itself and has absolutely no bearing on the review of the subject 16 project application. In sum, Conclusions 3 through 7 are improper and should all be stricken. 17 18 IV. THE SELF-IMPOSED RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS RELATING TO A 19 PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL SHOULD NOT BE HELD EFFECTIVE IN RELATION TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. 20 The Examiner's Finding 12 refers to a nearly 9-year old series of restrictive covenants 21 recorded by the property owner against at least a portion of the subject site under King County 22 23 Recording No. 8710220434. (Copy attached hereto.) They were recorded in conjunction with a 24 B-1 rezone request relating to a then-contemplated particular development of the site. While the 25 HALINEN LAW OFFICES,P.S. NOTICE OF APPEAL--Page 8 A Professional Service Corporation Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Bellevue,Washington 98004 (206)454-8272 1 rezone was granted,that development never occurred, the B-1 zone classification no longer exists, 2 and the site's zoning has since been changed to CA. The covenants should be rescinded because 3 the proposed project's design respects the site's steep slopes and will not cause view blockage from 4 5 neighboring residences, matters that appear to have been the concern of the old covenants.' 6 Accordingly, Conclusion 9 should be eliminated. 7 • CONCLUSION AND REQUEST 8 9 As proven above, by refusing to honor the City Council's crystal-clear policy choice to 10 make stand-alone multi-family residential uses permitted uses throughout the CA zone, the Hearing 11 Examiner's decision to not approve the proposed site plan on a zoning basis was contrary to law. 12 The Examiner's improper decision has cost the applicant a substantial delay, robbing the applicant 13 of a substantial portion of the summer construction season by wrongfully forcing the applicant to 14 prosecute this appeal. To avoid further delay, the appellants hereby request that the City Council 15 16 promptly reverse the Examiner's decision and approve the proposed site plan subject to the 17 Examiner's suggested conditions 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 as drafted and with the following substitution for 18 condition 4: 19 4. Unless a noise study demonstrates to the satisfaction of the City of Renton 20 Building Services Division that special window installation is not reasonably warranted, in order to inhibit interior noise levels stemming from Renton 21 22 Note that,on the face of the old covenants,no beneficial interest holder is stated and the City of Renton 23 is never mentioned as having any authority to enforce the covenants. Accordingly,the property owners contend that they have the right to unilaterally rescind the covenants. However,to avoid controversy with the City,thQ 24 property owners,without waiving their right to rescind them unilaterally,hereby request that the City Council 25 explicitly authorize and direct the release of the covenants set forth under the instruments recorded under King Co»ntyBecordingNns 8710220414, 8710290415 and R710220416 HALINEN LAW OFFICES,P.S. NOTICE OF APPEAL--Page 9 A Professional Service Corporation Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Bellevue,Washington 98004 (206)454-8272 1 Airport noise the residential buildings' easterly-facing windows that have an 2 unobstructed view of the Airport's runway shall be made of either (a) double-pane glass with the outer pane having a minimum thickness of 1/4- 3 inch and the inner pane having a minimum thickness of 3/16ths of an inch or (b) materials having an equivalent or better sound resistivity. 4 5 Please note that the applicant objects to the Examiner's proposed condition 2 because (1) the 6 property owners contend that they have the right to unilaterally rescind the old covenants given the 7 lack of any statement on their face indicating that the City of Renton has any enforcement rights or 8 beneficial interest in the covenants, (2) the zoning that the covenants were executed in regard to 9 (i.e.,the B-1 zone)no longer even exists and the project considered at the time of that rezone was 10 never built, and(3)the proposed project's design respects the site's steep slopes and will not cause 11 12 blockage of views from neighboring residences. (See footnote 4 on page 9, above, and the 13 corresponding main text.) Please note further that the applicant objects to the Examiner's proposed 14 condition 3 because(1)it would amount to an unconstitutional regulatory taking and (2) provision 15 is being made for dealing with airport noise under proposed substitute condition 4. 16 Respectfully submitted this 20th day of June, 1996. 17 HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. 18 19 20 BY: David L. Ha inen, WS A#15923 21 Attorney for Appellants 22 23 24 c:\ct\2275\002\cncl-appnotic-ap.fl 25 HALINEN LAW OFFICES,P.S. NOTICE OF APPEAL--Page 10 A Professional Service Corporation Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Bellevue,Washington 98004 (206)454-8272 DUPLICATE RECEIPT DUPLICATE RECEIPT CITY OF RENTON CITY TREASURER REG/RCPT : 02-36569 C:06-20-1996 CASHIER ID : G 12:83:00 A:06-20-1996 8000 MISCELLANEOUS REV $75.08 APPEAL 000.008.80.345.81.08.000003 TOTAL DUE $75.08 RECEIVED FROM: HALIHEN LAW OFFICES CHECK $75.80 TOTAL TENDERED $75.80 CHANGE DUE $0.00 DUPLICATE RECEIPT DUPLICATE RECEIPT it 001111111111111111. :f �► ® r l • 1- I CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Send:Copies to: CITY ATTORNE f� crrY,couNcu:ar�clvd*s newspa ffr.'�a�l � FINANCE/INFO SERVICES I.. FIRE DEPT/FIRE PREVENTION /1/-71 rsov / ` 'HEARING EXAMINER HOUSING&HUMAN SERVICES 02 MAYOR/EXEUTIVE: COMMUNITY SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK MGMT. 9' PLANNING,COMMISSION POLICE NEWSPAPER CODIFIER PARTIES OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONy, '� - AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES' efrnue,q�I '—L fi g 'Building/Zonin�/Plan Review .& .�r�,�� . PLANNING TECHNICAL SVCS./�'� Property Management � f TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS/i1 Wr` Traffic Engineering ' UTILrrY SYSTEMS" Arn 0041) AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. County of King ) MARILYN MOSES , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: • That on the 6th day of June ,1996, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: C'l% " 6'p2 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this h- day of 1996. ( 40'1 Notary Publ. and r the State of Washington, residing at .6)- , therein. Application, Petition, or Case No.: Renton Crown Apartments LUA-096-038,SA The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record June 6, 1996 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: Leitzke Architects Renton Crown Apartments File No.: LUA-096-038,SA LOCATION: Rainier Avenue N and South 119th Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Seeks site plan approval to construct 106 one and two bedroom apartment units. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions EVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on May 14, 1996. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the May 21, 1996 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,May 21, 1996, at 9:07 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity map application,proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site plan Exhibit No. 4: Landscape plan(westerly) Exhibit No. 5: Landscape plan(easterly) Exhibit Nos. 6 and 7: Elevation and floor plans The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by MARK PYWELL, Project Manager, Development Services, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South,Renton, Washington 98055. The zoning on the subject site is Arterial Commercial(CA)and Residential R-8. The portion of the site that is being developed under this proposal is the portion that has the Arterial Commercial(CA)zoning which does allow for apartment Leitzke Architects Renton Crown Apartments File No.: LUA-096-038,SA June 6, 1996 Page 2 complexes. Some of the rear portion of the site that is not being developed at this time is presently zoned R-8, which is a single family residential zoning. The applicant has specifically designed this project so that the development at this time occurs in the zoning that allows for it and the remainder of the site will be left undeveloped at this time. The density of the project was based upon the commercial zoning portion of the project site. The applicant has requested a Comprehensive Plan amendment on the site so at a later date they can return for some additional buildings, depending upon the outcome of the CP amendment and zoning amendment. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC)on April 23, 1996, issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated. The applicant will need to comply with the mitigation measures as part of the development of this site. The Examiner asked if the mitigation measures regarding native growth protection easement and the storm drainage vault had been resolved. Mr. Pywell responded that the native growth protection easement will be on the slopes that are over 40%. Those slopes are located at the rear of the site and come down through what would be the south boundary of the site. The applicant has proposed a location for the wet pond in the north central area on the extension of the site behind the existing commercial buildings and it is acceptable to staff. It also places it again in an area that will not disturb the steep hillside. Staff believes that the project is compatible with the CP designation as Employment Area Commercial. That does allow for residential development up to 20 units per acre. The applicant is proposing a density of 17 units per acre. The developed portion of this project is located within the CA zoning. That has a minimum street setback of 15 feet. The applicant is proposing to provide a setback of 30 feet. No side or rear yard are required in the CA unless the property is adjacent to an area that is designated single family residential(R-8). In this case the applicant is proposing to provide landscaping in the proper setback. In the CA zone the maximum allowable height is 50 feet. Apartment buildings by reference to the multifamily zoning are limited to 35 feet. However,through the site plan review,the applicant may request an additional 10 feet in height. The approval of height is based upon the applicant providing pitched roof buildings,recreation facilities or under-building parking. The elevations demonstrate that the applicant will be providing pitched roofs. They are also providing a recreational facility in the center of the project that includes both a recreation building and a swimming pool. The applicant has requested an additional one foot in height for a maximum height of 36 feet on some of the residential buildings. Staff feels that the applicant has met the criteria for the allowance of the additional height and that the 36 feet as measured in accordance with the Municipal Code is acceptable. It should be noted that the applicant will need to ensure that the buildings do not exceed the elevation 179 ASL(above sea level)and a 7 to 1 slope from the airport runway. At this point the elevation is no problem, and when staff reviewed the distance from the runway it was within the 7 to 1 slope. Of course, as the applicant prepares the construction drawings and final grading plans,they will have to ensure that the slope is maintained. The Airport Manager has requested that an avigation easement be recorded on the property for the protection of the airport, and as a warning to future residents regarding noise. The Examiner pointed out that previous rezone requests for residential development near the airport had been denied by the City Council, and asked what had changed to allow this development. Mr. Pywell responded that there has been additional residential building within the County that is closer to the airport than the proposed development. The Examiner asked if conditions could be imposed in the building construction to protect residents from the noise. Mr. Pywell stated that staff at this time believes that the project can be constructed in a manner that will protect the residents. A condition could be added that the buildings will be designed to meet the interior noise requirements for residential structures. Leitzke Architects Renton Crown Apartments File No.: LUA-096-038,SA June 6, 1996 Page 3 At the environmental review level, staff and the ERC were concerned with the slope on the south portion of the site that will have some grading on it, and the applicant at that time was proposing only to seed it for future stabilization. The ERC did place a condition of approval requiring the applicant to revisit the landscaping in that area. The applicant has come up with a plan for some additional tree plantings, along with some shrubs to be matched with the more native seeding and revegetation of that area in order to insure its future stabilization, and also to help with the aesthetics. The applicant will need to provide areas for refuse and recyclable storage, and will need to work with a local collection company to ensure they are easily accessible by contractor's equipment. The area around the project site has been built out for the most part. There is commercial to the north of the project site, some commercial and residential to the south, residential to the west, and the Renton Municipal Airport is located easterly of the project site. There has been some concern expressed by residents as far as the stabilization of the slopes, especially along the slopes to the west part of the site. Staff would note that the applicant is not planning to disturb those and leave the vegetation in place on those. Also, all of the grading plans that are done for the project will have to be done by certified engineer and need to be approved by the City. As far as the mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site,the grading and the planting of the slopes should help stabilize and also help with the storm water on the project site. The improvements the applicant is proposing to place on the site and their maintenance should help in the area-wide property values and would help prevent potential deterioration or blight of the neighborhood. Applicant will be providing a pedestrian circulation system. The Fire Department usually requires two access points to a project of this nature. In this case it was achieved through providing a split entry into the project. Both of those are more than wide enough to serve as fire lanes so that in the case of one route getting blocked, the Fire Department could enter from the other side. The one item that they do wish to be added is a continuation of the circulation system. They spoke of a fire lane to go behind buildings E, F and G in order to ensure that they can access all sides of those buildings in an emergency. At this time staff would recommend approval of the Renton Crown Apartments, subject to the conditions contained in the staff report. The Examiner noted that Metro King County had suggested providing some kind of staircase or regraded entry-way so that pedestrians wouldn't be dealing with the steep driveway as an access, but might have a more convenient way down to the street. Mr.Powell stated that applicant has provided a separate pedestrian link to the street which would be along and adjacent to building A and is shown on the landscape plans. An application to the Board of Public Works for the 12 to.14%grade is pending the site plan approval. The slopes to the site were reviewed by both staff and the Fire Department in trying to give it another secondary access into the project site. Due to the elevation changes between the_site and Rainier Avenue, no other location for an entrance could be found. If the Board were to deny the application for the steeper slopes at this point, then the applicant would need to come back with a revised site plan. Regarding additional geotech support for this site,Mr. Pywell stated that this site was originally an old gravel pit and the emphasis is to ensure that the grading and actual construction is reviewed adequately to ensure that the slopes that are created by this project are stable. Leitzke Architects Renton Crown Apartments File No.: LUA-096-038,SA June 6, 1996 Page 4 STEVE LEITZKE, 6102 142nd Avenue SE, Bellevue, Washington 98006, project architect, listed some of the difficulties in developing this site,particularly regarding the topography and access to the site. Regarding the location of the driveway, directly to the north is an existing commercial project. Their driveway access is on the property line. Typically it is good practice to separate driveway accesses to adjacent properties a distance of 150 feet. Even though the grades may have been a little bit shallower on the north property line, it was more important to maintain safety of ingress and egress to the project. The 12% slope is below King County standards and is not an unusual situation. There is a 40-foot landing at the base of the slope to prevent cars skidding out into Rainier Avenue in the case of snow. The Police Department recommended a gated entry to the site,but the slope is an issue of concern. As a part of the safety measures,the recreational building is located directly at the top of the access to the site. There is a loop road and at the top of that access road is the recreational building. There will be a surveillance camera operating 24 hours a day from that location so that cars can be observed entering and leaving the site, and that will increase the safety of the residents of the project. The natural topography of the site lends itself to a multifamily development adjacent to single family because of the natural separation as a result of the steep slopes, and also as a result of the access. No traffic will be impacting single family development. The existing residential structures that are located on the hillside are set back as much as 50 to 100 feet from the property lines, and there is an additional setback from the property line in most cases exceeding 100 feet. These will all become natural greenbelt areas that will be preserved and maintain the residential character of the surrounding neighborhood. None of the view impacts from the adjacent properties will be affected. There will be a recreational facility that will have an exercise room, a sauna, a tanning room and Jacuzzi, and an outdoor pool. Some other amenities that don't show up in the site plan are some type of basketball hoop and some sort of a children's play area. Because of the topography of the site,there will be several buildings with parking under the structures, and there are a number of garages and carports such that at least one car per dwelling unit will have covered parking. The FAA requirements for buildings and structures adjacent to the airport have been addressed. This project falls within the 7 to 1 contour and a brief study of the contours will indicate the buildings are 15 to 50 feet lower than the surrounding hillside, so it is well under any impact to the airport. An FAA approval still must be obtained and that is in process. Regarding the comment on suitability of residential on the site, residential buildings by their nature tend to be smaller in size and footprint than commercial buildings. To develop a commercial project on this site would be extremely difficult due to the topographic features. For that reason residential in this particular area is well suited. The Examiner pointed out that the concern about rezoning the site to residential was from the aspect of noise, not necessarily the topographic or footprint size of buildings, or even view blockage of the buildings on the slope above. ROBERT LEVINSON,Earth Consultants, 1805 136th Place NE, #201,Bellevue, Washington 98005,the geotech engineer for the project, stated that after reviewing the site and two previous geotechnical investigations Leitzke Architects Renton Crown Apartments File No.: LUA-096-038,SA June 6, 1996 Page 5 that were done for previously proposed projects,the site has been more than adequately explored. The slopes are stable. The grading for the project will tend to stabilize the slopes, control the drainage and ground water. DAVID HALINEN, 10500 NE 8th, Suite 1900,Bellevue, Washington 98004, spoke as legal counsel for the applicant, and objected to recommended condition of approval 2 concerning the requirement for the recording of an avigation easement inasmuch as the proposed development is designed to lie well below the elevation ceiling that applies to this particular site. Approval from the FAA will need to be obtained before the project is constructed, and applicant feels that that is adequate protection for the airport-related concerns. Mr. Pywell read the last two paragraphs of the Airport Manager's memo to staff into the record. Mr. Halinen reiterated his objection to the easement and stated it was regulatory taking and the airport is imposing itself on this property. Applicant has a non-noxious use proposed and would request that that condition be stricken. Mr. Pywell stated that avigation easements are a matter of course around not only the City of Renton's airport, but also other airports throughout the state and the entire West Coast. JAMES W. SPEARS, 8735 117th Place South, Seattle, Washington 98178, spoke as a nearby resident to the project site. He stated that historically this hill slides and at one time they had put up barricades to keep that hill from sliding down onto Rainier Avenue. He also expressed his concerns for the displaced wildlife and the noise to be generated by the apartment complex. He felt that a permit should never have been granted even for a study. NEIL WATTS, Plan Review Supervisor,Development Services Division, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055, addressed the issues of utility service to the site. There's a 16-inch water main available which provides adequate domestic supply and fire flow provisions. However,this is in the Bryn Mawr sewer area. The service boundary includes this in Renton, so there will have to be some negotiations done and completed between the City of Renton and Bryn Mawr Sewer District to allow moving that line. The Examiner asked with regard to the 12%grade, if access could be provided from the northeast corner. Mr. Watts responded that the topography indicates there would be less slope on the driveway if it were moved farther north. However, it does get closer to the existing driveway of the properties to the north. There is a balancing act of having less slope on the driveway, but needing some separation between driveways, especially onto a busy arterial such as Rainier. There is nothing, however, in the code that precludes moving that driveway within 5 feet of the north property line. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:15 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS &DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Leitzke Architects, filed a request for approval of a site plan for a 106 unit apartment complex. Leitzke Architects Renton Crown Apartments File No.: LUA-096-038,SA June 6, 1996 Page 6 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located in the vicinity of the 800 block of Rainier Avenue North and South 119th Street(King County address). The site is west of the Renton Municipal Airport. 6. The subject site is divided between two zoning districts. The portion fronting along Rainier is zoned CA(Arterial Commercial), a designation it received in June 1993. Generally,the western edge of the site is zoned R-8 (Single family residential/8 dwelling unit/acre). The site was zoned B-1 (Business Commercial)prior to the June 1993 reclassification. Prior to that time it was classified R-2(Duplex Residential). 7. A portion of the site was annexed to the city in 1963 with the adoption of Ordinance 2019,with the remainder annexed in November 1987 with the adoption of Ordinance 4090. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of employment generating commercial uses along the Rainier corridor and single family uses along the steeper western slopes of the subject site. The resource conservation/green belt covers the steep slopes of the site. The Comprehensive Plan designation does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 9. The area contains a variety of uses. North of the site are commercial uses. Single family homes are located west of the site on the bluff above a minor stream course along the west edge of the site. The Renton Municipal Airport is located east of the site across Rainier Avenue. Commercial and undeveloped properties are located south of the site. 10. The subject site is approximately 7.57 acres. Approximately one and one-half acres is zoned for single family residential purposes. 11. The site has been regraded by the applicant creating the existing contours on the site. The site slopes up from Rainier at about a 12 to 14 percent grade then is more gentle, followed by another steeper slope. 12. A series of restrictions imposed by covenant appear to limit development to below the 70 foot contour. (See Covenants: King County Recording No. 8710220434.) 13. The City Council had-denied a request to reclassify the subject site from B-1 to R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) in 1990. At the same time a proposed site plan for a 112 unit apartment complex was also denied since the site would not be appropriately zoned for residential uses. 14. The applicant will require an approval from the Board of Public Works for the proposed access to the site. It appears that if a driveway entered the site near its northeast corner and angled to the southwest, it might meet City standards without the need for a variance from access standards. Staff noted that this would create two driveways in close proximity to one another,the driveway from the subject site and the one for the adjacent site to the north. Leitzke Architects Renton Crown Apartments File No.: LUA-096-038,SA June 6, 1996 Page 7 15. The applicant will be preserving a native growth area located on the steeper slopes along the south and west boundaries of the site. This would create a buildable envelope that starts approximately 160 feet from the south property line and approximately 120 feet from the west property line. There is a "panhandle" portion of the site that extends to the north, including some of the R-8 zoned property. At the moment, no development is proposed in this northerly approximately 130 foot extension. 16. The apartment complex would consist of seven apartment buildings and a recreational building and swimming pool. Building A would be located in the northeast corner of the site, north of the proposed driveway and approximately 30 feet from Rainier Avenue. Building B would be located south of the driveway in the southeast corner of the site..It.would.be between 30 and 40 feet from Rainier. Building C would be located west of Building B in the central portion of the site. Building D is located in the north central portion of the site. Building E is located in the northwest corner of the buildable envelope. Building F is located in the west central portion of the buildable site with Building G located in the southwest corner of the buildable site envelope. The recreation building and swimming pool are located in the center of the site between Buildings C and D. 17. There will be a total of 186 parking stalls divided between underground garage, carport and uncovered stalls. 18. In order to provide secondary access,the applicant has divided the entry driveway with a center landscaped island. The Fire Department has requested that the driveway and access aisles be connected to the rear of the three westernmost buildings,Buildings E,F, and G. 19. The buildings will be stepped into the slope and the buildings will be located on different tiers of the slope. Each building will be articulated. The applicant has asked that building height be permitted to exceed the 35 foot limitation by one(1)foot due to the provision of the recreation building and garages which permit buildings to be 10 feet taller than otherwise permitted. The setting of the buildings into the slope means they will be two to three stories in height. 20. The applicant has proposed to landscape those areas of the site that are not part of the steeper slopes. The steep slopes will be retained in natural vegetation. The ERC required supplemental plantings to secure the slopes. 21. Development of the site is expected to generate a population of approximately 181 persons. Staff estimated that the apartment mix would generate approximately 47 students who would be distributed throughout the grades. This complex would generate approximately 690 vehicle trips per day with the traffic first funneled to Rainier. Staff did not believe that these numbers would create any untoward impacts on the community or the existing public infrastructures. 22. The applicant will be required to develop a storm water retention system as opposed to directly spilling the water into the conveyance system. 23. The site is located in the influence area of the Renton Municipal Airport. The Airport Manager has indicated that: "a high density residential area immediately adjacent to the airport is considered a non-compatible use." Leitzke Architects Renton Crown Apartments File No.: LUA-096-038,SA June 6, 1996 Page 8 The manager asked that if the complex is approved that the applicant execute an Avigation Easement. In the main it would limit the heights of buildings, appurtenances and landscaping materials. It would also require that the buildings be sound-proofed in some fashion so that residents don't complain of airport noise. The applicant objected to the easement claiming it was an impermissible taking of property. 24. The Commercial Arterial Zone permits apartments as "secondary uses." It defines them as follows: SECONDARY USES: Land uses permitted within a zone subject to conditions specified in the applicable section for that zone and designed to make the uses compatible with primary uses. Secondary uses will generally comprise a smaller proportion of the total uses in the zone. Secondary uses are not subject to requirements different from those that apply to primary uses. 25. The code provides the following standards: 4-31-10.4B2b. Multi-Family Residential: Multi-family residential are permitted subject to the following conditions: 4-31-10.4B2b(1). Maximum density shall be twenty(20)dwelling units per acre. 4-31-10.4B2b(2). Multi-family residential uses located in a structure that is restricted solely to residential use shall be subject to the development standards as specified in the Multi-Family Zone, Community Center, (MF-C), Section 4-31-8D of Chapter 31, Title IV, of the City Code. 4-31-10.4B2b(2)(A). Projects reviewed under Site Plan Review procedures, Section 4-31-33, may be required to build a ten foot(10') high ceiling for the first story of a building constructed solely for residential use, in order to maintain the long-term potential for conversion to commercial usage. (Ord. 4513, 5-1-95) 4-31-10.4B2b(3). Maximum density shall be twenty(20)dwelling units per acre. 26. The purpose of the Commercial Arterial zone is defined as: 4-31-10.4A1. Purpose: The purpose of the Arterial Commercial Zone(CA) is to provide suitable environments for"strip" commercial development. The CA Zone provides for a wide variety of retail sales and personal/professional services primarily oriented to automobile traffic along designated major arterial streets. This zoning designation is located in areas designated as Employment Area-Commercial in the Comprehensive Plan. 27. The following are an abbreviated list of the retail and service uses permitted in the CA zone: 4-31-10.4B 1 a. Retail: 4-31-10.4B 1 a(1). Apparel and accessories. Leitzke Architects Renton Crown Apartments File No.: LUA-096-038,SA June 6, 1996 Page 9 4-31-10.4B1a(2). Auto supplies. 4-31-10.4B 1 a(3). Auto, boat,motorcycle,recreational vehicle and equipment, including rental and leasing. 4-31-10.4B1a(4). Books, music, stationery and art supplies. 4-31-10.4B1a(5). Building, hardware and garden materials(including small trees, shrubs, flowers, supplies and tools within an enclosed area). 4-31-10.4B 1 a(6). Department and variety stores. 4-31-10.4B1a(7). Eating and drinking establishments. 4-31-10.4B1b. Services: 4-31-10.4B 1 b(1). Amusement arcades. 4-31-10.4B 1 b(2). Auction houses. 4-31-10.4B1b(3). Automobile repair and service. 4-31-10.4B1b(4). Bowling centers. 4-31-10.4B1b(5). Business services, including retail computer services,retail printing and xerography. 4-31-10.4B1b(6). Car washes. (Ord. 4404, 6-7-93) 28. Staff has recommended that a security gate could provide additional safety although it might be a hazard during snow events if cars were to slide down the steep driveway into it. The proposed 40 foot landing would probably prevent cars from sliding onto Rainier but a gate at the far end(the Rainier end)would hamper access to the site and could cause a backup of vehicles onto Rainier. 29. Geotechnical studies prescribe methods for maintaining the slope stability which should safeguard both the site and surrounding properties. 30. The applicant has provided a pathway from Building A to the sidewalk along Rainier. 31. The subject site is within the Bryn Mawr Service District and cooperation will be required from that agency to provide sewer service to this site. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; Leitzke Architects Renton Crown Apartments File No.: LUA-096-038,SA June 6, 1996 Page 10 b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use is not compatible in this location in this zone and the site plan is not approved. 2. Since this site has been the subject of a similar prior request that was denied after protracted review and it proved knotty at that time,this office will offer a possible recommendation that could be implemented if the matter is appealed to the City Council and they choose to approve the proposal. 3. Before proceeding with the analysis,the following discussions and conclusions are directly entirely at that portion of the property designated in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code for commercial or commercial arterial purposes and not toward those portions of the site designated or zoned for single family uses. As indicated above,this site was the subject of an earlier attempt to reclassify the site from B-1, a category not wholly dissimilar from its current CA zoning,to R-3. The primary purpose of both the old B-1 and newer zoning CA zones is to allow land for commercial uses such as retail and services. Then as now,the Comprehensive Plan designated the site for commercial activities. But in the interim the City reviewed it Comprehensive Plan between 1993 and 1995. That review again resulted in this particular site being designated primarily for commercial uses that would generate additional employment. 4. Not only did that designation result in a similar outcome,namely a commercial purpose for the subject site, but the applicant either failed to request consideration of multiple family residential uses or failed to convince the planning commission or the City Council to designate this particular site for multiple family residential purposes. 5. In addition,the City did a major reclassification of the City's various Zoning Districts. That reclassification did not alter the commercial zoning,represented by the CA zoning. Nor did the applicant's property fall within a number of what the City termed "errata" sites which were individually reviewed. In other words,the City seems to have concluded that this site would be appropriately developed for commercial uses. 6. While the reasons the site remained commercial are not spelled out directly,there appear to be a number of potential reasons. One is clearly delineated in the letter from the Airport Manager. The manager clearly states in his request for an avigation easement that a"high density residential area adjacent to the airport is considered a non-compatible use(emphasis supplied). Another reason could be the location of Rainier Avenue and the fact that the immediately adjacent use to the north is a commercial office park. Leitzke Architects - Renton Crown Apartments File No.: LUA-096-038,SA June 6, 1996 Page 11 7. While the CA zone does permit residential uses,they are a secondary use. A review of the types of uses permitted in the CA zone shows that in the main a variety of generally incompatible uses could be developed adjacent to the site. Included uses are: Apparel and accessories. Auto supplies. Auto,boat,motorcycle, recreational vehicle and equipment, including rental and leasing. Eating and drinking establishments. Amusement arcades. Automobile repair and service. Bowling centers. Car washes. Some of these uses are clearly or could be clearly incompatible with the generally expected level of quiet desired in a residential community. In addition, as noted in the prior decisions,the location of this site is quite isolated from other residential uses and therefore, expecting the development of a "community" is misguided. The children in this complex will be pretty isolated from their peers other than the other children in this complex. 8. It appears that the Rainier frontage opposite the airport was specifically designated for commercial uses and using the CA's "secondarily" permitted uses to sidestep both the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning code is inappropriate. There are areas where such a secondary use may be appropriate but clearly there are areas where mixing apartments and commercial uses and then adding airport noise into the mix is inappropriate. This office has to conclude that the proposal is not appropriate in this area. 9. In addition,there appears to be a set of restrictive covenants that limit both the location in terms of contour elevation and the overall height of any buildings and possibly other structures. The record in this area is unclear but this office could not locate any documents rescinding or otherwise altering the significance of these limitations. It appears that some aspects of the proposed site plan may violate those restrictions. 10. Given the above conclusions,the site plan should not be approved for this site. With that decision out of the way,this office will now discuss the other aspects of the proposal which are generally positive if the location were almost anywhere but where it is. 11. With the exception of height(see below),the proposal appears to meet the various limitations of the Zoning Code. It provides the required setbacks from the street and from the westerly single family zoning. It also meets the lot area requirements of the CA zone when developed with residential units. The proposal is 36 feet tall which is one(1)foot taller than permitted in the zone. The applicant may be permitted this additional height in this case since additional amenities have been provided. In this case,recreational facilities,namely the pool and recreational building and pitched roofs have been Leitzke Architects Renton Crown Apartments File No.: LUA-096-038,SA June 6, 1996 Page 12 provided. Building and Fire Code compliance will be determined with building permit application, although the site will need a link along the rear or west side of the property for better emergency circulation. 12. With the exception of additional traffic which Rainier can absorb and the potential for view blockage if structures extend above the limitations imposed by the restrictive covenants,the proposed development should not adversely affect neighboring property. The applicant has designed to the project to avoid direct intrusion into the flight corridors extending out from the airport although objecting to any additional limitations that might be imposed by the proposed avigation agreement. 13. It would appear that, again, ignoring for the moment the restrictive covenants,that the applicant, as conditioned by the ERC will be respecting the steeper slopes. There will be a native growth protection easement that prevents any disturbance of the steep slopes and additional landscaping has been required by the ERC. Geotechnical limitations will be observed in siting and construction activities on the site. The buildings are reasonably separated. They have pitched roofs,which provide a varied profile and the buildings step up or down the slopes of the site. In addition,trim and actual articulations in the facades break up the bulk of the buildings. Finally,the applicant has provided on-site recreation in the form of a recreation building and swimming pool. 14. The proposal should not adversely affect neighboring properties along Rainier. It might create intrusions into the view corridors from the homes west of the site if buildings extend into the area set aside in the restrictive covenants. 15. The proposed circulation through the site appears reasonable although the proposed driveway will need approval from the Board of Public Works. It appears that a driveway that would not require special approval would be possible if it were to cut a diagonal from the northeast corner of the site. This alternative configuration might also permit the applicant to install an access gate that might not be jeopardized if the driveway were to be icy or snow covered. 16. There is a pedestrian link to Rainier and the applicant should provide another access on the south side of the driveway that utilizes steps and a level path to provide a pedestrian path that provides less of an incline. 17. The separation between buildings should permit sunlight to reach the site and also allow for air to circulate through the site. 18. It appears that as long as the Bryn Mawr District is willing to provide sewer service,the site has adequate access to the necessary infrastructure. 19. In conclusion,the decision is that an apartment complex is still not a suitable proposal for the subject site but if the City Council determines that the Comprehensive Plan permits it and the use is appropriate in this location and the issues with the covenants can be addressed,that the proposal is acceptable with the final proviso that they may want to consider an altered driveway which provides a more gentle entry into the site and would probably safely provide room for a security gate. Leitzke Architects - Renton Crown Apartments File No.: LUA-096-038,SA June 6, 1996 Page 13 DECISION: The site plan is not approved. ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION: If the matter is appealed to the City Council and they determine that the project should be approved, this office would suggest making the following conditions a part of any approval: 1. The applicant shall comply with the Conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. The applicant shall address the restrictions in the Restrictive Covenants by either getting approval to rescind those restrictions or redesigning the project to comply with those restrictions. 3. The applicant shall execute the Avigation Easement as embodied in the letter of April 29, 1996 from the Airport Manager. 4. The applicant shall install soundproofing materials in all buildings to reasonably screen out noises that would be generated by both the general aviation and engine testing conducted by Boeing. 5. The Council might want to consider an altered driveway which provides a more gentle entry into the site and would provide room for a security gate. 6. The applicant receive the appropriate approvals to connect to the sewer systems of the Bryn Mawr Service District. 7. The applicant provide a combination of stairway and level path on the south side of the driveway to link the complex to Rainier. 8. The applicant shall provide an emergency access roadway that links the parking aisles from Building E to Building G,to the rear of Building E,F and G. It shall be gated at both ends to prevent improper parking or blockage. ORDERED THIS 6th day of June, 1996. 144#2 FRED J. KA I AN HEARING E II R TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of June, 1996 to the parties of record: Mark Pywell Steve Leitzke Robert Levinson 200 Mill Avenue S 6102 142nd Avenue SE 1805 136th Place NE,#201 Renton, WA 98055 Bellevue, WA 98006 Bellevue, WA 98005 Leitzke Architects Renton Crown Apartments File No.: LUA-096-038,SA June 6, 1996 Page 14 David Halinen James W. Spears Neil Watts 10500 NE 8th,#1900 8735 117th Place S 200 Mill Avenue S Bellevue, WA 98004 Seattle, WA 98178 Renton, WA 98055 Patricia Jarvis Wallace Morgan Carol Geiger P.O. Box 1056 11900 87th Avenue S 11914 87th Avenue S Renton, WA 98057 Seattle, WA 98178 Seattle, WA 98178 Mike Meyer Ethel Woodward Laura Baggett 8731 S 117th Place 8816 S 122nd Street 11225 84th Avenue S Seattle, WA 98178 Seattle, WA 98178 Seattle, WA 98178 Chris Feldt Tony Hoare 11908 87th Avenue S 600 Market Place, #1 Seattle, WA 98178 2003 Western Avenue Seattle, WA 98121 TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of June, 1996 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman, Plan/Bldg/PW Administrator Members, Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson, Development Services Director Art Larson,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann, Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney James Chandler, Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Mayor's Executive Assistant Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Valley Daily News Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in. writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,June 20, 1996 Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in Leitzke Architects Renton Crown Apartments File No.: LUA-096-038,SA June 6, 1996 Page 15 private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow,them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • • -? SE 1/4,NW 1/4,SEC.7.IWP.23 N. RUE.5 E.W.M. . Z i • • • % I EN • • 1 ' ! ..T..t. SITE ' 1 �J ._ /If ?�'/` /o '' yvf �nsccws rxFlcc 1 ` :t]1Y.a1. Ii. ir z 7 L 1 . !lj %; 'l ,j!' j/iP I ^; nG,•. / ('rxw1pF,a' x-,. • VICINITY MAP v -7 7 . • ! I :1,/ //\, . :1. —lrr I•p,Pir--. • _ 1_—.r- 1 Z \__• • v/1 , / ` / Ei- l `t.:3 -`-G.', _ dy.]` l' • eirurww vrca: ]. BALLAL?OS STALL. mr.oci]L°roGminm nri.ao°ri• uu rr, :an ,,. KCAL. W �]/., //1,� / �� 1 j J��]/ 1/ }L. ,./�(-, !•- 1 } • t�':r�,.p.r�Las�~'i s°e I. 1rMw.MN Lr][[1Lu M[•LT m Lc]nrw or L ru.. H •• • •y. % iirk `\'� \., I ^' , • I II `{ •N• t4 ! f `'r'u'� I V � .°e :1� < TILiM[ILUI]TUTCLMi L]'LTOI. GAIN iUlG N CWd1ZC ,'�y� • L 1.YJ r • B0. !L[e l 4. '� W •` ` '• i w A _.zJ 1 �'�. �1 I • (t %I 1�;� ��. 1` ° �. Q.]a T \ •! .• , .. .� stops I 4.•:1: ''_ce'°a..m. i•_.. r �'wi+-` ::- It 1 OyC K U i '1.�ru.•J• ; • ;'�'�._�---I" it ;''= 11- '_`. III G1. , i...X-,5�- •' t...-TM 1(�¢'�`. \ .1\!——•I'"."}---- -T 1 l ...1 •-- r �i._ II '`_4 '- ((r�1 .li 1 1 II \`\ it 1 •'\\• ,F.a j1;� 1� n — - ?t. _J_;�I _ ; .3 t'.�u'':�,. ;- 1;, ,1 1 REVISIONS • [[ 1 • \ �,\t \ .`i�k 1 • 1.;•�—,,Ayr • 1"^J l _"i: ; 17m 1 \ �• , T.i'r�.,..t�; iI1lT1�a.l�r.lff:1..:_f� "—�i ;� V]', S,•, ,1. `1�'...T CI -.1 r 1'JC•-11'1",4-7..L,.. ....... \�I`a� .-- . '` `t 1q, ' ''Il �C\ ;\1 "__ �' \ �� 1 Y'+ ----\ \\,..' s. \i. ,� •. •`,..\\' f '. i i - -• l.s._ �'' :\ ',�\ 1\.• NORTH ph ninkt2 • atte _ i• ,`f)!: (.i \--7-•/r /*,. -~�'` ti ^�11: \ .��- ,1• 11 SU1y_• r••4o' m'6:.n A , .� '�11i _. __._. ` -�- , Z ` • � ''ye CONCEPTUAL'..\ _._. ��( ¢ - !�, t - `.1\,1 -, '\� o .':.t .. UTILITY PUN r-�'\, ` .>� JAEGER ENGINEERING VI 9419 S.204th PL. ' 14:••; 11`I KENT,WA. 98031 (206)850-0934 • . 4 • - % - \� -- ` �, — . 1 • / , \,\ 1\S. v. 'V\ \ --____ • :. / \\t\ \ \ ....,.\ ' lik eql— • ' ' :. 1\ \ \ \\Iiik:t !; t of \ !' • • '\ . . litvillk:,\ ' ... fe tritio4: .i;t-• A \ I. . . • 0 11)1t - ,,;--!-..— t`.:Vit. ..„.„„..__..-.,....... ..,„.„,.,, ,. i V ei -16, 11. Iry �.rl 0 �;;A. _ +} ipit VIPr3 .• 1.4,.. --1-- - 0 . • ,..„, . 41, 40,„-, t !!!!! i ltmil._ . , _ • , ,. 4.4 . _____...,___,_ , . , 11(ii. tik:-.4.,.. • . . 0 .tliliS, . ' \ ‘!PA . .7.i:vici • I 0 kt.11 '''‘‘' 'I !I I I IIII III 111 I I I I I 17 I - :oi, ti,\ \\ \ - ! • • i li iii, ...„,_..1..r,.../4,4404,4111111111 • oillik.„.„..�`` -• t / AO&1 r q!j°�30�'ou ii'rai;i••Zi • CM %OW '1 .-13‘like, . \". . t, a • \ IS 0\\' 1 Iliiiii'llT , `SCE �.•••71_ , - o:�� ilk►i2-C•'5:'''''''''''' ...51,,s1;.....V......:i." '(:‘ . , . . . 1.•;;rf .' ' -� ...110.0., " � fit + • it: \\I• \ . 1111VrtlitS- CIA• . _.....24 Wie iii% • • o• +v ;� • 10\Ctit „ 1.,1\ _„.,-------- - 1 . \ vi4.3-ti?,..t. •cipi, vp,_..„, . . • '110.14M. ---t-itl' ,.....- ,.. _ _ \ \ :41.<16•-'714 .$1•'''O:.'"-4(''4-tr,-..A.h. ril.'illt= -...:--::-4--:.---27.:-Ik-•::•-•4. \,\ � m/ .rays •.wa.-.L('i \ \ - . • ) • 1 • • b \ \ /Od /,p • : . 11 i / (I • \‘' \ a 1 a. ' 'Ili . \ 'i - ' ' PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN I�j 7�•=-=: • `� �.:11kiiiNii. ,/' / off` �-. • NN4 . , Lk\s„.**716'. ... .I*t $ 1 ( (.44. -----,..„ 116\161k N116:01ZIC*.:\ ' ikIL\'s \ \ N \ \ ' r',",kmz WiL -714b-4-1446%-.:-..---4,7wittN70.:,-"ti.. 7-1P'A,11%\\::.' \ \ \- ogi , 1� ab►i�/R:. ii?,• �'e,� \ \\\ Zoe • ; - -"----------- r *Alt• . 1 \ \ \ • : •( ____-_ -it --Ad 1111. : ..1).1. k \\,.,.\\ e:45‘ -\ \ • \ . • flel Pk OA . * ' . \ \ • VP - . \ \\ \ , .m.z.c.i.‘ � ,,:,� art. ii.84S: \Aio,,..., - -'s, \\NNI \ ill ...\sompi Ali „it-.of! .. C 1 \ \ e\ • i � .�° l I I I • • ,iii „.•Kiv„ ,` iskk I , ,.73 .,...... . ....: r. r t. tiN,.. i I Ill{ . 61V. T:11111 1 ' t` ik 1. \ ! 441 li 1 ' \ J iG j‘' :4k. kk \ k . 1./ .1111 ItileirlifrAi*NN1 2 •i V\ \ V. -..A.1:;; t*"j4 \ \ ' ••••\.‹. ...----.- 451,116;'.T.i.41C,:iir.v.i • 1 . \ . (fill • it, _„,„4-..., ., ; w+,4, :- ,,,, ) ) , ...,531:4-1. . • . /.. •.. s , . mktipi d° f. \ ) ,..tr'd"""I MI I tligiii ii a •. " .Aill'i#4 17AI 19'‘‘ • 0 . .• . . f.:fr.'W TIN:4 7 7 IN,44114r. 1// ..V • • • --1174 91 I I M I I Int .i i:•.. 1.44"Va / Z.ie Y._ . illiikt"407' / ,. ... ..44 i VII gm. NI : -.36.,.:4 .ik wA t / . ' . : .. -if-7_ .--- ----- MiliiiitAktgr& • . I • -le , di 0 PAI*444W' //2 • I • Oir....1CIA.Neiwk,a. -�••!S• ::....' .►1: _ r,. �- / , ice, i. _e 09611 1 '44 i 6 1 41:*000 . / 7 : "ii: :h •444140 ,41,_ _4„,.,- • , • //, /(// , firliiiiiiiiIiiiiiiiiiiiiviimiii. ii .14V/// / iii/ / - F . • ... 8 441‘ *V° - / // .1k ./' ‘4,/'Vd: '/ / /.. HEIII IRS 1111111 111111 11 PM • >D: ///�� .. _ _ tt J . 1. ,.J6 i� e ill ��'� =T- az8 II • .0 v ___ PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN (I .. ---_ Washington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133 9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 � % CLI � � -� A/4 FD 0 2 DATE: May 14,1996 of�F<o Q �96 MAY 2 8 1996 is*. -NA, offA,,ac TO: Mark Pywell City of Renton, Project Manager M RENTON H RING EXAMINER 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 900 MP 9.86 CS 1796 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-Renton Crown Apartments — /04o uNirs File No. LUA-95-038,SA,ECF FROM: Robert A. Josephson, P , Manager of Planning & Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project which is located at Rainier Avenue South and South 119th Street. Our response is checked below: We have reviewed this subject document and have no comments. The • project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. X The State recommends that a traffic study be prepared to anaylyse the state intersections that are impacted by ten or more of the project's generated peak hour trips and also determine what mitigation measures, if any would be required. If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name c DETERMINATION procedures and the mitigation measures ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE imposed by the City of Renton's Environ- RENTON. WASHINGTON mental Review Committee are available at The Environmental Review Committee the Development Services Division, Third (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Floor, Municipal Building, Renton,Washing- Significance - Mitigated for the following ton 98055. Phone:235-2550.You should be project under the authority of the Renton prepared to make specific factual objec- Municipal Code. tions. RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS A Public Hearing will be held by the LUA-96-038,SA,ECF Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular The applicant seeks environmental review meeting in the Council Chambers on the and site plan approval to construct 106 one second floor of City Hall, Renton, Wash- and two bedroom apartments. The pro- ington, on May 21, 1996 at 9:00 AM to posed structures will be a maximum of consider the Site Approval. If the Environ- three stories in height. There will be seven mental Determination is appealed, the buildings with 10 to 20 dwelling units in the appeal will be heard as part of this public building. Location: Rainier Avenue South & hearing. South 119th. Published in the Valley Daily News April The 15 day comment/14 day appeal pen- 29, 1996. 1495 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ods for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 p m. on May 14, 1996. Appeal r cts .x a) . N ` p . its C) CL., co -o3 a) O o a) c c >cts o Z E y - ; c C N •- > To co 3 ` t a) C O Q N • Z 0• ° 0 0 3 O cats >+a) cn >, O 0- E fJ a 0 r C ' 'F L coc Z > Q ° a � 3 j ° 0 ca I � co O aa) c as c O r D 0 �,n. ig in � � a) CZ c� a) .0 f-- c � .5 aci °'cam a > �'� V obi u) cn .7 ctsY a) 0) C . I o o O C ra.EULL ' VDU Q � � ov�� ai •o o U o c— a) J W a"i °c ° 0. c � `'.6 fir. To >, c Z a) cts a) 0 7 o ° co d Y 0 a) J Y aa)) c52a3i �E c_- x) o J ' :° C0 Ei Q C '� u) `) cccts � cca ° Ntsc o Z c — a) • 0 O i) (DC o 'as a°) ..— . 3 ccts O U J o cn r ;,a co co a) > w 3 .o •� 0. ww E 3 o o E 0 Q t � � � 3 a) o E .` . a) U Q N � iocaZY oo. o �~....„'' _ .,� ° o C .0 Y o 7 N — E �S ..•...ti Um rn to cD acts '0 E 'c0 .0 @ a) .. C �`�.••• • c� Q 0 Ti ki co cts 0)0 — k, c 0- 0 0 . 7 v.• c -- c s a ... mio °•- 7— p o c :2 . mom '")• r � ._ •� c o a... C 2�•i1)�II Q w co _ 0 �• i itq r r 0 ToC 0 r -0c .c . •..... CZ w O c Cn ' C m cts ~ 7 * /' 11 COE -dam 3 rfl co CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 146 day of , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containin -t }}yea."v� E1 ILK. 1Aer . Qe�v1 documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing 43tet 'erke.. Voln\ Excava�r``I rb*1KC1Q, VoYV1b ldakkar-e Ifvlonor‘ C4,101 GeAoer wood ward t . -t ,19�tt- On s Nast on (Signatde-of Seei er SO,,1I1d1,CL „. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING )I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that /, M/A,e4 ///- SE signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 5/117 J /.r �� ✓ Notary is blic in for the State of WashnngtoR_ Notary (Print) jinx \./• > •l • My appointment expires: Project Name: cet1 Project Number: 04 _0361 Sp+‘ee-1111 NOTARY DOC qL -038, spit ,Ec-10 CARLTON DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING cm(OF PENTON MAY 1 41995 May 13, 1996 RECEIVED Mr. Mark R. Pywell, AICP City of Renton Planning Department VIA FACSIMILE 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mark, Re. Renton Crown Apartments As discussed in our meeting today, we agree that there will have to be some additional planting on the sloped areas of the site which will be disturbed during the development of our project. It is our intention to leave as much of the native growth on the slopes as is at all possible, and would not only grass the disturbed areas, but also plant two or three dozen small fir trees and other species in general that are indigenous to our area. Our concern is that the hillside be stabilized as well as be an attractive element of our development. Sincerely Mark H. Lundberg President 704 N.E Northlake Way • Seattle, Washington 98105 - (206) 547-4162 • 0 King County MAY 16 �yyb Metro Transit Division Design and Construction Section, CITY OF RENT Environmental Planning and Real Estate PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. Department of Transportation 821 Second Avenue M.S.122 Seattle,WA 98104-1598 (206)684-1418 (206) 684-1900 FAX May 13, 1996 City of Renton Mr. Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA. 98055 Mitigated DNS, Renton Crown Apartments, , LUA96-038,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Zimmerman: King County Transit Division staff have reviewed this proposal and have the following comments. The checklist correctly states that there's a transit stop 250 feet away from the site, served by route 107 which operates on 87th Ave. S. That is the closest transit stop serving the site. The slope of the site may make access to the transit stop difficult for residents. Staff requests that a walkway, stairwell or other pedestrian access be constructed to facilitate transit access. Well marked pedestrian access from all buildings to Rainier Avenue South across the site is advisable as well. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, it;)„,41--"" 1447 Gary Kriedt, Environmental Planner g:\oap161.doc ;; `;; CITA_ JF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 16, 1996 • Mr. Steve Leitzke The Leitzke Architects 6102- 142nd Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98006 SUBJECT: Renton Crown Apartments Project No. LUA-96-038,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Leitzke: This letter is to inform you that the comment and/or appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. As you have been advised, the public hearing before the Renton Hearing Examiner will be held on May 21, 1996. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, 344/1/ Mark R. P , AICP Project Manager cc: Kohl Excavating, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan/Owners FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 --- CITY•••O R .:::::::..:.....:.......................................................... ......................... N.. • :.MU1 1. 1. ►L.. tUILDING .......................... th:ey..:w�.l: .:h .ardltirs w li be e8 14t hearrng et the dtc #ian of the Hear711xt�1: . i`r.:::::::::.:::::::::::::.::.:: 8:30 AM PROJECT NAME: Vehicle Impound Hearing PROJECT NUMBER: Case No. 96-3746 PROJECT NAME: Renton Crown Apartments PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-038,SA,ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site plan approval to construct 106 one and two bedroom apartments. The proposed structures will be a maximum of three stories in height. There will be seven buildings with 10 to 20 dwelling units in the building. Location: Rainier Avenue South &South 119th Street. APPEAL PROJECT NAME: Valley Medical Center Cogeneration Facility PROJECT NUMBER: AAD-96-029 (LUA-96-005,SA,ECF) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The appellant, REBOUND, appeals the Environmental Review Committee's Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated (DNSM) for the Valley Cogeneration Facility project. Valley Cogeneration proposes to construct a 6,000 sq.ft., two story building to house a gas fired cogeneration power plant. The appellant alleges that the DNSM was issued in violation of SEPA. Site Location: 400 South 43rd Street. HEXAGNDA.DOC City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date May 21, 1996 Project Name Renton Crown Apartments Applicant The Leitzke Architects File Number LUA-096-038, SA Project Manager Mark R. Pywell, AICP Project Description The applicant seeks environmental review and site plan approval to construct 106 one and two bedroom apartments. The proposed structures will be a maximum of three stories in height. There will be seven buildings with 10 to 20 dwelling units in each building. Project Location Rainier Avenue South &South 119th Street B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record Khol Excavating Inc. Profit Sharing Plan 2. Zoning Designation Arterial Commercial & Residential - 8-du/acre 3. Comprehensive Plan Employment Area - Commercial & Residential Single Family Land Use Designation 4. Existing Site Use Vacant 5. Neighborhood Characteristics North Commercial East Airport South Commercial West Single Family Residential 6. Access Rainier Ave. North 7. Site Area 7.57 Acres City of Renton P/B/PW Department - - Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS LUA-96-038, SA PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 21, 1996 Page 2 of 8 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area N/A New Building Area 98,272 sf 7 Residential Buildings& 1 Recreation Building Total Building Area 98,272 sf C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation 2019 3/25/63 Comprehensive Plan 4498 2/20/95 Zoning 4404 6/7/93 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities Water 16" dead-end water line in Rainier Ave. N Sewer Bryn Mawr Service District Surface Water/Storm Water 24" pipe in S. 121st. On-site detention will be required. 2. Fire Protection City of Renton Fire Department 3. Transit None 4. Schools Bryn Mawr Elementary School Nelsen Middle School Renton High School 5. Recreation Cedar River Trail Liberty Park Coulon Beach Park 6. Other N/A E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Section 4-31-10.4, Arterial Commercial Zone 2. Section 4-31-5, Residential 8-du/acre 3. Section 4-31-27, Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance 4. Section 4-31-35, Greenbelt Regulations PRELMRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS LUA-96-038, SA PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 21, 1996 Page 3 of 8 F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Residential Single Family 2. Employment Area Commercial 3. Housing Element G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant seeks Site Plan Approval for development a 106 unit apartment complex. The applicant proposes to construct 62 one-bedroom/1 bath units, 22 two-bedroom/1 bath units, and 22 two-bedroom/2 bath units. The applicant intends to construct 7 buildings that will include 10 to 20 apartment units in each of the buildings. A recreation building with swimming pool will be located in the center of the complex. The project site was extensively excavated and graded in the past as it was used as a gravel pit. There is a large bench 20 to 35 feet above Rainier Ave. and a smaller bench 5 to 10 feet above " Rainier Ave. Between the benches is a man made slope which will be graded as part of this project. The purpose of the grading will be to stabilize the slope. There are some steep slopes on-site that are designated as greenbelt areas. On the west side, these slopes will be maintained in there natural state. On the south side, the slopes will need to be graded to a 3:1 slope in order to stabilize them. The slope will then be landscaped and allowed to return to its natural appearance. This project is in the influence area of the City of Renton Municipal Airport. The tallest building proposed is two feet below the elevation of the adjacent slopes. Due to the proximity to the airport the applicant will need to ensure that the buildings do not violate the height restrictions of the airport, notify the FAA prior to constructing the buildings, and record an avigation easement on the property. The applicant will also need to inform potential future residents of the proximity of the airport and that the site will have aircraft flying overhead as they approach the airport. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on April 23, 1996, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the Proposal. 3 COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall record a Native Growth Protection Easement on the steep slopes on the south and west portions of the project site. The easement shall be recorded prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. The applicant will need to comply with this condition. PRELMRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS LUA-96-038, SA PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 21, 1996 Page 4 of 8 2. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan that includes the steep slope areas of the site. The plans shall demonstrate a mixture of tree, shrubs, and groundcover on the steep slopes. The revised landscape plan shall be submitted a minimum of ten days prior to the public hearing on the site plan. At the time that this staff report was prepared the applicant had not submitted the revised plan. Staff will present the plan at the public hearing. 3. The applicant shall be required to install either a wetvault or a wetpond as part of the storm water quality system. Plans to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division shall be required as part of the submittal for the construction permits. The applicant is preparing the storm water quality system as required by the Environmental Review Committee. 4. The applicant shall submit a Parks Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per multi- family dwelling unit. This mitigation fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. The applicant will need to provide this fee at the appropriate time. 5. The applicant shall submit a Transportation mitigation fee of $75.00 per trip generated by the apartment complex. This fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. The applicant will need to provide this fee at the appropriate time. 6. The applicant shall submit a Fire Prevention mitigation fee at the rate of $388 per multi-family dwelling unit and $0.52 per square foot for the recreation building. These fees shall be submitted prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. The applicant will need to provide this fee at the appropriate time. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and into the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-31-33 (D.) "The Hearing Examiner and City staff shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to discourage creativity and innovation. The site plan Review criteria include, but are not limited to, the following:" PRELMRPT.DOC City of Renton P/BIPW Department ,- Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS LUA-96-038, SA PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 21, 1996 Page 5 of 8 GENERAL CRITERIA: A. CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS & POLICIES The proposed apartment complex is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation of Employment Area- Commercial. Objective LU-AA: Provide for commercial and residential uses requiring large amounts of land and/or high visibility and access to large volumes of automobile traffic in areas outside of Centers and the Center Downtown designations. Policy LU-171: Residential uses in the Employment Area - Commercial designation may be a single use development and should be limited to a maximum density of 20 units per acre. The proposed apartment complex will be a single use development at a density of approximately 17 dwelling units per acre. B. CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS The following requirements and development standards contained in Section 4-31-10.4 Arterial Commercial Zone (CA) of the Zoning Code are applicable to this proposal. 1. SETBACKS The CA zone requires a minimum setback from the street of fifteen feet. The applicant is providing a minimum setback of 30-feet. No side or rear yard setbacks are required in the CA zone unless the subject property is adjacent to an area that is designated for single family residential development on the City's zoning map. The rear portion of this site is currently zoned for single family residential development (R-8). The CA zone requires a fifteen foot landscaped area or a five foot wide landscape area and a sight obscuring barrier along the perimeter of a project if the adjacent property is zoned for single family development. The property at the rear of the project site is zone R-8 which is the single family designation. Although this property is currently vacant and the applicant for the apartment complex is the property owner, the applicant is providing the required landscaping. It also should be noted that the applicant has submitted a request for a rezoning and Comprehensive Plan amendment on this property so that at a future date it may be brought into the apartment complex. 2. HEIGHT Normally, the maximum allowable height in the CA zone is set at fifty (50) feet. Apartment buildings are limited to 35-feet. However, through the site plan review process the applicant may request an additional ten feet in height. The approval of the height is based upon the applicant providing pitched roofs, recreation facilities, or under building parking. The applicant is requesting an additional one foot in height, for a maximum height of 36 feet on some of the residential buildings. The applicant is providing pitched roofs on all of the buildings and is providing a recreational building on site. Therefore, staff recommends that the applicant be allowed to build to a maximum height of 36 feet as building height is measured in accordance with the Municipal Code. PRELMRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS LUA-96-038, SA PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 21, 1996 Page 6 of 8 The applicant will still need to ensure that the buildings do not exceed the maximum height limit of this area based upon the distance from the Renton Municipal Airport. The buildings, structures, and light poles can not penetrate the 179' ASL (above sea level). From the information provided by the applicant it does not appear that any of the buildings will penetrate the 179' ASL limit. The structures are also supposed to remain below a 7:1 slope established from the center of the runway. From the information supplied by the applicant it appears that the buildings will be below the height limits for this area. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the final grading of the site takes these height limitations into account. 3. LOT COVERAGE The maximum lot coverage in this area is 45%. The plan for the structures proposed by the applicant covers approximately 19.1% of the site. Thus, the proposed project is consistent with the design standards for this zone. 4. PARKING REQUIREMENTS: Chapter 14, Title IV The applicant is required to provide 1.5 parking stalls per apartment and 1 guest parking stall for every four apartments. The applicant is providing 186 parking stalls (1.5 x 106 apartments= 159 parking stalls+ 106 apartments/4 = 26.5 guest parking stalls for a total of 186 parking stalls). The parking provided by the applicant is consistent with the Code- requirements. 5. LANDSCAPING The applicant has provided a landscape plan that demonstrates adequate landscaping within the project site with the original project submittal. The Environmental Review Committee required the applicant to submit a revised landscape plan that would demonstrate an enhanced landscaping plan for the slope area that was being graded to stabilize the slope as part of this project. The applicant had indicated that this area would only be hydro seeded. The applicant has presented a revised landscape plan that demonstrates adequate landscaping along the slope that will stabilize this area. 6. REFUSE AND RECYCLABLES COLLECTION &STORAGE The applicant will need to provide refuse and recyclables collection and storage areas in accordance with the Municipal Code. The applicant will also need to work with the local collection company to ensure that these areas are easily accessible by the contractor's equipment. C. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES; The area around the project site has for the most part already been built-out. The applicant will be landscaping the project site to provide a buffer between the adjacent development and the apartment complex. The development that is at approximately the same level as the proposed project is commercial in nature and should not be impacted by this project. The residential development adjacent to this project is located to the west at the top of the bank. The concerns of this project to the residential area would include view impacts and the potential for erosion of the bank. The view impacts of this project should be insignificant in that the proposed buildings will not exceed the height of the bank and therefore, the single family homes will still enjoy the view over the proposed buildings. Erosion should also not be a problem in that the slopes in this area have been stabilized by a growth of native vegetation that will remain as part of this project. Any on-site grading will be inspected by a soils engineer to ensure that it does not create an stability problems in the area. PRELMRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Heating Examiner RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS LUA-96-038,SA PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 21, 1996 Page 7 of 8 The applicant has also been required to develop a wetpond/wet vault as part of this project as well as bio-filtration. The storm water from this site empties into Lake Washington and the Environmental Review Committee found that it would be necessary to provide a complete storm water system in order to protect the environment of the lake. D. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; The grading of the site and planting of the slopes that are graded will help to prevent erosion on this site once it is developed. The on-site storm water system will ensure that the storm water does not cause erosion or carry pollutants(i.e., oil from the parking lots) into Lake Washington. E. CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES; The design of the proposed structures and the landscaping on a site that is currently vacant should help to conserve, if not improve, area wide property values. F. SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION; The applicant is providing a pedestrian circulation system on-site that includes sidewalks and paved pathways. This internal system will be connected to the sidewalk along Rainier Ave. The vehicular circulation on-site is adequate in size and layout. Although it will only connect to Rainier Ave. at one location it does provide for two driveways separated by a landscaped median. In an emergency, fire or police vehicles could enter either side if one entrance were to become blocked as part of that emergency. City staff reviewed the potential for a secondary (emergency) access point for this site. After careful review it was determined that it would not be feasible to provide a secondary access to this site due to the elevation difference between the site and the adjacent roadways and private drives. The applicant is proposing a driveway that exceeds the recommended slope (8% maximum). The proposed 12% slope will need to be approved by the Board of Public Works. At the time that this staff report was prepared the applicant had obtained a copy of the application and was preparing the necessary documents that need to be submitted. The Fire Department is concerned that the interior driveways as proposed by the applicant do not allow for emergency vehicle access behind Buildings E, F, and G. Staff recommends that the applicant extend an emergency vehicle only access road (paved 20 foot width) behind the three buildings connecting the driveway to the south of Building G to the driveway north of Building E. This road should be laid out in a manner to allow emergency crews access to the corners of the buildings. G. PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; The buildings are well laid out across the site which should allow natural sunlight to reach all of the buildings and not cause wind tunnel effects between the buildings. PRELMRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS LUA-96-038, SA PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 21, 1996 Page 8 of 8 H. MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; Once the project is constructed there should not be noise, odors or harmful conditions generated by the use of the site. Noise is already regulated by City ordinance. 1. AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE;AND Adequate public services are available to this site. J. PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The project as proposed should help to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight. The proposed buildings are well designed and the landscaping should help to maintain an attractive appearance at this site. H. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommend approval of the Renton Crown Apartments,file no.LUA-96-038 SA subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee's April 23, 1996 Threshold Determination. 2. The applicant shall record an Avigation Easement on the subject property. The Easement shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the Airport Manager, Development Services Division, and the City Attorney and recorded prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan demonstrating an emergency access only road behind Buildings E, F, and G to the satisfaction of the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Development Services Division. The plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Site Plan Approvals (SA): Two (2) years from the final approval date. (Extensions may be requested and need to be submitted in writing to the Hearing Examiner 30-days prior to the date of expiration.) PRELMRPT.DOC • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-038,SA,ECF APPLICANT: The Leitzke Architects PROJECT NAME: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site plan approval to construct 106 one and two bedroom apartments. The proposed structures will be a maximum of three stories in height. There will be seven buildings with 10 to 20 dwelling units in the building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Rainier Avenue South & South 119th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 p.m. on May 14, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. PUBLICATION DATE: APRIL 29, 1996 DATE OF DECISION: APRIL 23, 1996 SIGNATURES: V/2.3 7.( Gre i mean Administrator /gg� DATE Departm nt of Planning/Building/Public Works f / "-/k7h-4- Sam Chastain, Administrator DATE Community Service Department .0/1 C 2-3 7f‘ Lee ee er, Fire Chie DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-038,SA,ECF APPLICANT: The Leitzke Architects PROJECT NAME: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site plan approval to construct 106 one and two bedroom apartments. The proposed structures will be a maximum of three stories in height. There will be seven buildings with 10 to 20 dwelling units in the building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Rainier Avenue South &South 119th Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall record a Native Growth Protection Easement on the steep slopes on the south and west portions of the project site. The easement shall be recorded prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. 2. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan that includes the steep slope areas of the site. The plans shall demonstrate a mixture of tree, shrubs, and groundcover on the steep slopes. The revised landscape plan shall be submitted a minimum of ten days prior to the public hearing on the site plan. 3. The applicant shall be required to install either a wetvault or a wetpond as part of the storm water quality system. Plans to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division shall be required as part of the submittal for the construction permits. 4. The applicant shall submit a Parks Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. This mitigation fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. 5. The applicant shall submit a Transportation mitigation fee of$75.00 per trip generated by the apartment complex. This fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. 6. The applicant shall submit a Fire Prevention mitigation fee at the rate of$388 per multi-family dwelling unit and$0.52 per square foot for the recreation building. These fees shall be submitted prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. MITMEAS.DOC/ CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-038,SA,ECF APPLICANT: The Leitzke Architects PROJECT NAME: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site plan approval to construct 106 one and two bedroom apartments. The proposed structures will be a maximum of three stories in height. There will be seven buildings with 10 to 20 dwelling units in the building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Rainier Avenue South &South 119th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General Notes 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. Parks and Recreation 1. The proposed street tree landscape improvements along Rainier Ave.need to be maintained by the owner/applicant. 2. Rainier Ave. has a stripped bike lane in this area. The contractor should post signage and excise caution during the construction phase of the project. Renton Police Department 1. It is anticipated that an apartment complex of this size will generate 97.52 police calls for service annually. The applicant has proposed excellent security/crime prevention services and this will have a big impact on reducing the estimated number of calls. 2. This area of Renton routinely experiences vehicle-related crimes such as auto theft and theft from vehicles. The Police Department recommends an electronic gated entry to the property. Apartment complexes that have electronic gates suffer minimal to no crime. 3. The applicant needs to be aware of the construction area thefts going on in Renton. Construction materials and tools need to be secured when not in use. Lighting the site during the construction phase of this project will also help to reduce theft. Renton Crown Apartments LUA-96-038,SA,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued)] Page 2 Fire Department 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 2,000 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required for each building. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structures and one hydrant is required within 300-feet of structures. 2. An approved sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout all structures, except the recreation building. 3. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout all the structures,including the recreation building. 4. A looped fire apparatus access road is required behind buildings E,F, and G. Construction Services 1. A licensed architect and a structural engineer are required for the preparation of plans submitted for building permits. 2. The soils report will need to be revised and submitted to Construction Services at the time that the applications for building permits are submitted. Total adherence to the soils report is mandatory. 3. Structural fill requires a separate permit from Construction Services. Sewer Utility 1. This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. 2. This project is located in the West Lake Washington Sewer Basin. 3. There is not a City of Renton sanitary sewer main available to serve this site. 4. Sanitary Sewer system needs to be negotiated between the City of Renton and Bryn Mawr. The existing agreement in principle signed by the parties in 1989 will need to be reevaluated due to conditions existing in the City of Renton Sewer System. 5. Sanitary Sewer System Development Fees (SDS)fees will be a part of the negotiations between the City and Bryn Mawr. Water Utility: 1. This site is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. 2. This site is in the Downtown 196 Pressure Zone. 3. There is a 16"dead end water line available in Rainier Ave N. 4. This area is not identified on the Comprehensive Water plan. 5. Per the City of Renton Fire Marshall,this project has a fireflow of 2,000 GPM. 6. Fireflows that exceed 2500 GPM require a looped watermain system around the building. This is additional information for the applicant in case the buildings are revised such that the fireflow requirement increases. 7. All fire hydrants must be capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM. 8. Watermains are to be located in the driving lanes. ADVNOTES.DOC/ Renton Crown Apartments LUA-96-038,SA,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued)] Page 3 9. System Development Fees (SDS)fees of$0.113 per square foot gross area but not less than$850 are required if they have not previously been paid. DRAINAGE: 1. Drainage system shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM. 2. A Level 1 Downstream analysis has been submitted and reviewed by the Plan Review Section. 3. Direct discharge will not be allowed due to lack of capacity of the downstream system. Detention is required. 4. If there is 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious area subject to vehicular use,a Biofiltration Swale is required. 5. A site visit was made. The pipe in S 121st is a 24"and was running full at the time of the site visit. 6. The Surface Water System Development Charge of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious area but not less than$385 applies to the proposed project. Street Improvements: 1. A variance from the Board of Public Works is required for a driveway approach in.excess of 8%. 2. Curbs,gutters, sidewalks, and street lighting are required to meet City standards. If the existing curbs,gutter, sidewalks and street lighting meet the City standards then no improvements are required. General Plan Review Comments 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer in accordance with City of Renton Drafting Standards. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvement is 5%of the first$100,000, of the estimated construction costs;4%of anything over$100,000,but less than$200,000, and 3%of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. ADVNOTES.DOC/ City c nton Department of Planning/Building/Pc Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: t S`,ergce0 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 11, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-038,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 27, 1996 -TY OF RENTON APPLICANT: LEITZKE ARCHITECTS(STEVE LEITZKE) PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS WORK ORDER NO: 78075MAR 2 7 1996 LOCATION: RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH&SOUTH 119TH STREET SITE AREA 7.57 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 98,952 SQJ'." i LJI VISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks approval to construct a 106 unit apartment complex on a 7.57 acre site. The ._ project includes seven buildings containing 10 to 20 dwelling units each and a recreation building. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Bement of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth - Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Lia\st kal[Tar asi31-A[�dDuti glob)n . I ltI Yt% 1'1{Ul.n l f VET D . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 5 c 1 I G l/1 Q T - g ga 15 Lbmtu Im Pull A L , tifkG 11/0 N c YD TK, SDiILS PariT 15 mPit6OK0 �i - 5%0111/ F[c� �Q0i '�.s A ''.1''R r' PE1201[1 evi ed this p 'cation with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas e itio I snee ed to property assess this proposal. I ‘q&° SI ature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DE PP.DOC Rev.10193 M DEVELOPMENT APPLI ;ON REVIEW SHEET 0 PI"- REVIEW ROUTING SLIP '0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHE( IST REVIEW S 'ET [] _ .APPLICANT: Rfi//L C�CCAJ.¢ A16 he /123 .!f gioµ1.,.. f�T/ RECEIVED FROM V(ra Per JOB ADDRESS: <-D f .¢rnJfFA' i /�/ W NATURE OF WORK: IRrA.7rolJ el uJ n) 4f nCNTS /114 i'a rf-c GREEN# O SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 114 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED - 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 VICINITY MAP O NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES 0 FRONT FOOTAGE 0 OTHER . O VESTED 0 NOT VESTED - O This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review/ dated . /0 PARENT PIM(subject to change)_ SUBJECT PROPERTY PID/ f/ROOO— 30 70 91.S/3ff 35 3 8S� 0 King Co.Tax Acct/(new) 3/GS73j7c/9/oo It is the intent of this development fee analysts to put the eveloper/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities.street improvements.etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT . . DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE ' Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER . Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER Special Assessment District/WATER 0 — . Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER ��v"— Joint Use Agreement(METRO) .J Local Improvement District e " Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE •OBLIGATIONS • SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER I OF UNITS/ . SDC FEE ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) ® Never Pd . SQ.FTG. Single family residential$850/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park Apartment, Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x /C)6, $ S`f 040 .00 Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq. ft.of property(not less than$850.00)X • Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter rt,sao GPM threshold) " SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) ® Never Pd Single family residential dwelling unit$585/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x Apartment, Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x /CL $ 3 7J I CGS .c' 0 Commercial/Industrial, $0.078/sq. ft. of property(not less than S585.00)x REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New-Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER ❑ Pd Prey. ❑ Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) CI Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x All other properties$0.129/sq ft of new impervious area of property x y,�9�_z /2� 7�� / (not less t 385.00) I PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ /0'3, 9a yj {J t.....q IX/4 L< Sig tote of Reviewing Autho(yyr DATE 0a / ii •If subject property is within an LID,it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept.for paid/un-paid status. • The square footage figures used are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only. e:hemplate/feeapp/tab EFFECTIVE July 16,1995/Ord.Nos.4506,4507,4508,4525,and 4526 7 4 n 0 oti�Y o� CITY OF RENTON + A® ♦ FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU �"`� MEMORANDUM •ei�NTo� DATE: April 4, 1996 TO: Mark Pywell, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Code-Related Comments for Renton Crown Apartments 1 . The preliminary fire flow required is 2,000 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required for each building. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structures and one fire hydrant is required within 300-feet of the structures. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $388 per multi-family unit, and $0.52 per square foot of building for the recreation building: 106 units x 388 = $41,128.00. 1,460 square feet x $0.52 = $759.20 These fees are payable at the time of building permit issuance. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout all the structures, except the recreation building. 4. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout all the structures, including the recreation building. 5. A looped fire apparatus access road is required behind buildings E, F and G. CT:js Crown CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: April 10, 1996 TO: Mark Pywell FROM: Arneta Henninger X6198 IVIA4 SUBJECT: RENTON CROWN APTS RAINIER AVE S. & S 119TH ST I have reviewed the green folder application for this project which is located in the NE 1/4 7-23-5 and have the following comments: SEWER: • This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. • This project is located in the West Lake Washington Sewer. • There is not a City of Renton sanitary sewer main available to serve this site. • Sanitary Sewer system needs to be negotiated between the City of Renton and Bryn Mawr. The existing agreement in principle signed by the parties in 1989 will need to be reevaluated due to conditions existing in the City of Renton Sewer System. • Sanitary Sewer System Development Fees (SDS) fees will be a part of the negotiations between the City and Bryn Mawr. WATER: • This site is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. • This site is in the Downtown 196 Pressure Zone. • There is a 16" dead end water line available in Rainier Ave N. • This area is not identified on the Comprehensive Water plan. • Per the City of Renton Fire Marshall, this project has a fireflow of 2,000 GPM. • Fireflows that exceed 2500 GPM require a looped watermain system around the building. This is additional information for the applicant in case the buildings are revised such that the fireflow requirement increases. Renton Crown Apts. Green Folder'' April 10, 1996 Page 2 of 3 • All fire hydrants must be capable of delivering a min. of 1,000 GPM. • Watermains are to be located in the driving lanes. • System Development Fees (SDS) fees of $0.1 13 per square foot gross area but not less than $850 are required if they have not previously been paid. DRAINAGE: • Drainage system shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM. • A Level 1 Downstream analysis has been submitted and reviewed by the Plan Review Section. • Direct discharge will not be allowed due to lack of capacity of the downstream system. Detention is required. • If there is 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious area subject to vehicular use, a Biofiltration Swale is required. • This site is required to provide water quality treatment. This may be a wetvault or a wetpond. This should be a SEPA condition, since it is not directly stated in the code for this situation. • A site visit was made. The pipe in S 121st is a 24" and was running full at the time of the site visit. • The Surface Water System Development Charge of $0.129 per square foot of new impervious area but not less than $385 applies to the proposed project. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: • A variance from the Board of Public Works is required for a driveway approach in excess of 8%. • Curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and street lighting are required to meet City standards. If the existing curbs, gutter, sidewalks and street lighting meet the City standards. then no improvements are required. GENERAL • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer in accordance with City of Renton Drafting Standards. • Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvement is 5% of the first $100,000, of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000, but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder Renton Crown Apts. Green Folden''' /_ April 10, 1996 Page 3 of 3 when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. eq . • ' fl. r. CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: April 29, 1996 TO: Mark Pywell, Senior Planner FROM: Gail Reed, Airport Manager- SUBJECT: Proposed Renton Crown Apartments Rainier Avenue and South 119th Street Reference is made to the Staff Recommendation to the Environmental Review Committee of a Finding of Non-Significance-Mitigated, on April 23, 1996. The apartment complex is proposed to be constructed on the west side of Rainier Avenue, just west of the Renton Airport. Topographical maps show that the land between Stevens Avenue and Rainier Avenue is steep, sloping terrain, with an altitude above sea level near 125 feet (125 ASL). The apartment complex will be located beneath the Airport Horizontal Surface. This surface is at an elevation of 179 feet above sea level (179 ASL). The apartment complex structures, light poles and trees cannot extend above or penetrate the 179' ASL surface. In addition, there could be an additional height restriction based on a 7:1 slope from the Airport. I could not locate the proposed complex using the map on the staff report, and so was unable to determine if the 7:1 slope restriction would affect the complex. Aircraft sometimes overfly Rainier Avenue at a low altitude. The location of the apartment complex would be almost directly beneath the route taken by the aircraft. The allowance of a high density residential area immediately adjacent to the airport is considered a non- compatible use. To preclude noise and aircraft overflight complaints from future residents, an Avigation Easement is absolutely necessary. Because of the apartment complex location and the potential for trees or man-made objects to extend above the complex into tale Horizontal Surface, and the potential for complaints from the residents of the airport complex concerning aircraft noise from the airport, it is requested that an additional mitigation item be the granting of an Avigation Easement to the City of Renton. This easement will permit the operation of low flying aircraft over the subject property, the operation of aircraft on the airport, and will prevent the complex owners from permitting trees or other objects to extend into the Horizontal Surface, shine lights into the air in such a manner as to affect pilots, etc. L .1LL•L\1 I. O7I:.i%V a‘..W a a.••a.u•a...•• •. ,.. ,. , 1 1— r; Eil DEVELOPMENT APPLIC!' )N REVIEW SHEET 0 P. ' REVIEW ROUTING SLIP , `' 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHE(.--.[ST REVIEW S 'ET ❑ �-- OTHER T APPLICANT: ROL C>;CAc) A/6,KC ?9 •<f b440, — RECEIVED FROM /XXV FaJOB ADDRESS: ��"_<-C/ 1-/n.'/7=4 r4e'E- /4 WO# ( NATURE OF WORK: (tCtrA..'7DU' C •u'/J �r,27mCA/75 /A as ifs GREEN# 0 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: CI LEGAL DESCRIPTION W . SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED O SQUARE FOOTAGE ❑ VICINITY MAP O NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES 0 FRONT FOOTAGE 0 OTHER O VESTED I] NOT VESTED - 17 This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review# dated . /O PARENT PID#(subject to ch ange)� SUBJECT PROPERTY. PID# //ROW O- SIC.)?/9/S/3 f.345 3 S53 CI King Co.Tax Acctil(new) 3/65/397 7V/oo It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the eveloper/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits.r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. I SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS • NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE ._ Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER i Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER ' D.. j . Special Assessment District/WATER r c — Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER .- v— Joint Use Agreement(METRO) Local Improvement District ' Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS I I • I SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER #OF UNITS/ . . SDC FEE 0 Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) ® Never Pd SQ. FTG. Single family residential$850/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park Apartment, Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x /0/A $ Sy (7 6 O •00 Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq. ft.of property(not less than$850.00)X • Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter R,aoo GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER . ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) el Never Pd Single family residential dwelling unit$585/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x Apartment, Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x /Ce- $ 3 7J /CL' .c' 0 Commercial/Industrial, $0.078/sq. ft. of property(not less than$585.00)x REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New-Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) El Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x All other properties$0.129/sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less t 385.00) ' el 5-2 ' /2/ 76V.. �1 l r PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ /c.3, 9; y, S/ t y/�� Sig cure of Reviewing Autho DATE a `a *If subject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. ' **The square footage figures used are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only. 0 e:/template/feeapp/teb EFFECTIVE July 16,1995/Ord.Nos.4506,4507,4508,4525,and 4526 CD A 4 vs O it ( City t.. ..dnton Department of Planning/Building/PL-._= Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: abeka COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 11, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-038,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 27, 1996 APPLICANT: LEITZKE ARCHITECTS(STEVE LEITZKE) PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL • PROJECT TITLE: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS WORK ORDER NO: 78075 LOCATION: RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH&SOUTH 119TH STREET SITE AREA: 7.57 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 98,952 SQ.FT. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks approval to construct a 106 unit apartment complex on a 7.57 acre site. The project includes seven buildings containing 10 to 20 dwelling units each and a recreation building. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics _ Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources )'�� Preservation ' , B. POLICY-RELATED COMME T / G/xs G2./.�., �a�--, ...1 r-r4.61xaalmeed,r77644;7-2 / gee.,,, _ci paaeoL matb4A-4.- 1=-.),121)2-cer../-c41.- 1,--c, • 610,_ 'f.4-g-- "1-flav?...) `' „It,fa-1 a�fi £ ZL/QY.C. . ,.../ ,lam• X 3 54•, z h't. ivado C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 0-7 Cr..41/27 1 15 -/-2-071t))4 #46_____ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have lden' d areas of probable impact or areas Cwher�e additional information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director r Authorized Represen ive D to OEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 i (- : r I , City c nton Department of Planning/Building/Pt Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: eOkl(-e COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 11, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-038,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 27, 1996 APPLICANT: LEITZKE ARCHITECTS(STEVE LEITZKE) PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL `,, PROJECT TITLE: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS WORK ORDER NO: 78075 LOCATION: RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH&SOUTH 119TH STREET SITE AREA: 7.57 ACRES • I BUILDING AREA(gross): 98,952 SQ.FT. SUMMARY-OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks approval to construct a 106 unit apartment complex on a 7.57 acre site. The project includes seven buildings containing 10 to 20 dwelling units each and a recreation building. • A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Alr Aesthetics Water light/Glare Plants Recreation LandYShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation q'l. Sa forIce Cao.15 -Fr sefv\ct. eal:i rested t lit • l`h.t we Ck actnf has 9 D fmed e)ccit 1Lent sec1ufrEq ) cr ntQ ?roJe1- Dn ser v i Les to IP tS b . , CV.O tVniA. ui t1 1 aut., 0L. lo'i g i.r Tact- of' re.duzi n9 941.2._ number o4 esfirnaAtd eottce, coals . l ila axe ge pn roU Uftel& -e)Wer Ienccs veh,ct . - rat ecl crimes 3u.ch ci A.i-to c k2ff. -Prom v ehl c1,e.S . 76 ConkPLg_ Will b el 9Ctaeen ?-ethcn Ccn-re r ci- kplui, ftutwo 6each cOlta of smelt h s Seu, . . 2er cn as cL -" 6� Q„u4o 4u.f� Odong eatruld M.) , 4- . , CA feu) OF cut n it(n'` CIQs are- recovered Co At Setaird. hrK I Zanti A fxcL . Ina t:i -hon iD OIL becuc-ij already �is-ed NIGyp licarr- , •e cornnrtk,rtd an diz-i-ror1ic, golfed eni- y it) au Pop peftq • A 'mr lt- D(L.P Lacs tea+ Irlavt Wyse- suffer' Tnro m mi n i rna 1 fo no Gr i nl.. . I-b to vx_- ode0,4 Xit h►-(- +o OIL res'►oltrit3 and, Ill.Duld- 10 c-- ck Sellin 'ot`n-1- -1v AL Man MerrWin+ . 1+ (WRAC). G,lso h-( eASV hp in 31&t l (C /I1;e1u_ is only o nc> vcht clL atc-css poi n 4- At Pro PeI'tLf 11c. Qp P l t ccunfi also in: 4S fo t ot✓ux -e. Of 4kt- consf(Li C ,cn Qfts gotno� on ►n rtentn • eons-tru.c*;on (y\ ite.rtats (1.- GIs TO _ SeCUY'Ca U) no-I- , n tse, , ar'1 U4u 51te (LU2d5 *0 he_ -I t- l►4- Larl ag (i cvc to e nur t -o nib p l�.is cour'L4 t M,2fl- And.. ✓aAc a.l w i nk.. . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1.-11 Y"`r"" a ' 7l1 3—cj( Signs ure o Director• Auth•rized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 • ice.., •`•:' 1 ti'g' P. . '.;.i ' SE 1/4,NW 1/4,SEC.7, 1WP.23 N. RGE.5 E. W.M. . z i 1' /- - • CG 1 '/ / j ' ',''i c a. i. el{ i• __\P�vv Aw)(� '!•�//1 /� '�,S..r, ITE ' ^ ` '/ /' � / T ;`' / II �'+r•' � .ee p. - _� '- i:•.� • ;� i %: % - E]Fllr-IG CFFIfC ` I ' r 0 z s�> C�nvE�u r /^ I(l, / ./i/a ','. 11 / IA.32' " I a •- K,I .1, I-I .... -. # f z �' </l/l r /�I/ / %/: ' ''iI x.SA oelAw WNW. VICINITY MAP 1%%// / ;r/ /•%- 1#/.P, w: m IAN. (s.•) / �ie,eN'P.a. . J..___„--,--4*-•‘-'-'-- 1 il.n..:— .. 74. \ ,, • ` • v, •/r,., a //' /r./ ' I ('• e• L=iIII 6JLC; • ,/- ,,,, ,TMTVJI SAKE' ALL PIPE SHALL BB SOHROWr®POLYETHYLENE PIPE.SOOIN. //, ' /�/ , '/ I i 1 ( h. _ \`\t lIL' - - _ - ' , ' )Fr' e, RAMS-U.iD I L B6 P �L P A MI V '/ A. - BALL=INTERIOR.SUCH AS ADS.N13 OR 0` 1,1 • .' / // it 1 ir,) ' ee _ 1• rr#J; 1 L T� , 1 }1 ivcx .''groE w,DH, T' ocw"MPOPPiu.i12isys.L AT run ELOIMNfNO D Ix a ' irtnPGm,: :: ..!+A,APPL 6a.Vl Z . /' /; 4_�.,-__ ...I yT ALL CATCH PASIAS SHALL BR TYPE I,UNLESS SPECIFIED _ 1 HI A '�Io OTHEPVISL. 4 l'j / r'-J'• J ,'1 1, L�-�c-,,-- �! 1] .. •" IPPD �!�'SE OOMn1ENVPS AAD iCVIIH.6�PIPRBAT 3\ a{7.1IM �•4' ,!) `�� }-. ■ '� li elgc.u\ 1', F•'' y\11 v I ,TLI'HE O l I/Y- / i.// / 3 i '> .: _.. 1.. _ -I1I _ '•�� ''- \-----. .'...--_: _ 1.. " I', IN TI 7^E0." CP115� 5 s`wvePixn B z z ` 1 1 r�[ L[_.J+�-�_ _ _ ,{ ALL 1• 101.9..JSUPPe NEAREST TO TEE G]C'H BASIN INECRTI VE SWAMP U> \ \.\ . I I r _ 1\ I •RLG�A• `� \"• f bi \1 'HR S•Ivwl!r�00 BASFW H AND SPAIN SHALL BP CxvPTE. z.� ` I �1j 1 ` 11 1qy I .�`_t TS MS SANIT .SSE.ER SYSTEM. 41 Ogli • H U 1.jI II 11-1 • ,''�J� eL � II �M•�1 _ L-2 Mom" \I :I I I• i ( �,i '`I '�. 1 --�1 � I. ___ _.-�=-1�' • ,1111 1 ��:— vwrve 1 � l- -.1 1 1 t"'r i I i '� 1` `1 5'''_:._-- —� , _.:, ,, -4__ - g, _ 1 r ,' ).1 41'`IL • 1 1, I¢1�' , F.._A-` ,-1 1 — � Ll C II ; - 1,.._q --L-1. T-' �9! 1 1 ' I l't `.� 1, �''I' 1 n _ - - .-�_�.1 _._ ::_.,� t� 1 '1 '• REVISIONS '\ l' . ) y Y j I_ } l -_ '''.1 1 'Lto�:;el i�` • 'A 1 \ \�\ `; 6 A '- ��Y ` e1 `�: 1-)_1. .1.�'fI \ r �I I. 1�`-ii� \ P" 11.. IIf _ . . • ',t,I\\',,,1 • , 1 , 1111)1111iti 7-•.1), \ ' . .L \ \\ 1 • \� -` 1 , �1. �„t P i'ti•-c-I:r •I�{1_L—ir I 1 \'. \ t C 1 SLI`-� A�./'J:II�f pwiuP G w La Ro.I--„_,„�,V_ t' ' '� , I. 1 1 -,..\ Ya 1 ', \ idl n_enb r \.\_ �� II`\• .1i�1 _``� �� , 1\, t NORTH rR41on J, III 1 / 1I�, / J _____ -__Ib. ..\ \ 1 A • li 1' �'T &TIC. s-'NN: revision is • �' , _. '% - --- ..�-r7,,- `\ i$ 0 • -- __'--j`�P�/// i_d'/:'�,/f, '� ]'— 'uo'..'-.Pno:\i+ :.�---`_`. �� ®fie � �1i' CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLAN '6, • \' % ( �1 . i—� '.- ! ---.A.-, - - ~-, \ `-�j1\,; • 1 3- JAEGER ENGINEERING \��_ I�---,_------1_,_.-...,_::::---:,---;,.." ,_�i� .% i ` J ,I,I a^Via, 9419 S.204th PL. ii- / \1•: • ' \ ', °� ,`•l'„iaP KENT,WA. 98031 ` s . " (206)850-0934 -..' r, • -ti� / / / / "-- .� di ./i ,4. i -- \ k-leg.‘.. : . I /,,,,y / &/- ,_____ // 1 7/07/0 A 4444 ______ \ . l (4,.. ,....„. _44..,. . -iN, _ 74, to; .........„ ........_ ........_ . _ *-v,.N -. ,,, ,1 .1 s:k 4 0 4 tt,-' \N N ik1/4.. \lik��.. . 1 \\p� \... x Lk\ \ -.. . ZZ`:FC� � kik161:44‘14*. ` 4;‘,4)% leo,- Iter**1‘1**#%\ \\ \\\ \ Tio CnC _lit..1Th.t•-tr,-,M_.!.,::-.:,-;,-4.,‘:,,,,,'„, -- VI% . \ -\\ \\ \ . :-'7,-.....za-tr:-..ii 00 m,._ \\ \\ \ • a _ I. 0 — _ ' . .( ___----00111fr ).I'• \ \\ .16%'\___ \ , ( \611r I 0. r . sz,t. \\ 1 VillAt I 1 \ \ 1 alail Al-'100111 \ `1 I I .0.0elitnagik ,A.:1P.:11411\1\4\‘ . , to„ I War- - \\ \ ii 1 l , Is: li'.\\* \ tkit'A 1 .11\\\\c- \ t---II nowt •‘• 2..,1&, 11p, 1 \ ,,(., -- -1111 linal,P744%. 1 )211 \\ \ je t __..__ tilliktrg,;'1;‘,„:"..):y-,,'').',. ). wi, #s4A.; c‘, )\\\ \\ . 4' ibk -1.-41.1=r---- ., , . ‘ip 1 ' / • \ 4.04,,,°)1 d° ) \\ '---- P''V-(jF•4'ArifrAIELVg'LFIro.'• ,' 441/`• -44:4-1 co. 0 Itiii - ..;.;si pp:"..."pp--=,aii..,' .• \ 4 A_ ,, c,,, ) _ ,.. . 4.-fr., :I .' 40,,• 410. .&_.,4441/- • . . --iik,.. ,n • • 4 1 , 4 4 // y..-- - rip-- Jo .14 7 -6(e--- < -,_4,,,, _ EMIllWrI, givi SS ,‘,.,Y r _ ______- ---- -----IMIER'4, 41414 r (/ . ._.__ ., _ . _ Thor#-.0%**4,4000..44,,,///19A54.4, 4, ' , 4:41t-smi/ rill.' 4,!:''''; ;At lie'4-/- 2 /7 ' _ ...,. e•:;:e.--47: , ; / 1///4 • KA q 1 I, Nk .4iWief,‘- / 7// / 1 lirril iiiiiiii 1111111 firli 111111 IIIIII i , N ,k 1) . .,p / , 4 //(„ / i R I I i if : I: - S * ,7/////1//// i 1/ / • i : : ; , AO / �� , /i1 / e/j / /)i / i / a i I i$ iQ l fag ijIiI1111'! 0111 t1 zte. ! t 14 t $ i VIi 5-x. .1{ill ;: • PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN I r _ L \ S �� \ _ �- % / 1\. \I\ \'1\ 4- 03\9?\\- - 1 . ,/... \\I \.\Ilk \ \%,;44N -\ � N._ \ „.,A, \. . , .: , \ • : \ , , , .1,1 „0%,, ,,,,,,,,A . \ \ . . I,1 • • vit,‘ . , ,ftioi.;;‘* , \\::..s, \.,.,,, \ k-. ‘#,„.‘ -7--.0 , .• .. . ..,.• F.,,,,, ,.,,..,:,,,,..,.. ‘, , . .,„„ , _ ,,, -,....,„,.. ..„ ,,,,,„ „...,„,,,,,:. ,.,.,,,.:,......;...,. . . \ _, • !, ,......,., . . ,,,, i..��Ioo'�G',►,wwr/i ... ..vM.. .►�...w...avM,l.wt.,,,L,... . , ‘,.:„..„...„ , ‘,... _....... , ; �� „�� i.i„i '4+S...,•'.f°�:uGao'1..L:L':%4 i_TSrze F..'IMP-Mir I '�-Mir4►IP,'i��r'''"" i� . tii ti.,...,-,,, 3 Mom- _ imi - i I 0, Fl, >St all1• - - 1 a � � �� ., ,mil Teo:;,.._ 1 Ip� \ • -.7, -7.. • : ta) .1411 i„.„.0111.1 la'. Itl IPA t ti . . : . , Or 'vz:•:b.11 ..:....;1{ rrili !ilw • 1 V i ria) ki.s.l&V.t.....-7,-,ci)!:‘,,pa' *0 .-. ' -- 117.74.61;n::,',57-; _ . , ' ' • . . . lii,...rdiaki---.V6.-•%....% . ,,am ..� ,:. ;:.''''r.s \ . • i \\ - 104ww"-""40.- Asigh4---iroll...„.11%v Lk ....amoinivir \ , 1/40rA , ...,,,,..- . • \ ' 01111.171r Ali. '/---. .. \ *,...)01.• ; 11,7 1 II 110 1.4 \ • 4*\ '1.1 ''1 4 I a r Ihi ' : • •-•';'.V.I..... ....-.e." i \ ' . . / 0 th i • i 10 iiiiiiiiiiiiilltilar40:64: -*:."4"/;-••-''' Ail* \ . • \\ f4 5 fr k.I. eC):OA.m'' 2' V1-1). •••' rtti '''. .''-* .4*1 ‘ 1 CIK4 'e#'::' —II W " ,2� I f 41110 \ In\\\ 'to- -iv A _ • diV.ti till . . 0.V 4 „J.:9.-kw' .. • • K4.44114.--...AA.- 11:1) ER flii . - -dilk -di; . • . \ ‘ \‘\ \ -.- • - 1 \ / . a \\ / I I // / it • `1 • o ., 1 • • J11 / , K.; >›,,,,›-,3; ,-, 1 „ 14, 0 • I. a P y aa• fl. --r II C? f��',1+ =T+,wey . �� 1 • PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN �� ih "'�„—�- 'l --4-4o VATF FLOURESCENT L 1:%rN PI_ COPE SEARCH \ (2)eA•CAePoRTN.• I1 II_ — --_ ZOHMG Oam EDINGJURI5P.M. MT OFKENYON 1 :11.7-f;I: _ WING .-]u1D..MITER,CW1419AL MENDED ( 'T T __—I I j- ' RUT u9P5.ORDNANCE.So.wLnsAa.Lv 1,1\�.I II I I_C.Ic I—Y---- _----cam --- -�,,-t- I 4- -_ _ I—•a sr.no.,ev SUBJECT FrucrralcT ti:NG. HE¢LST I -• CPAAIIMtt CENTER. SECTION 1-31.60 • .. I' .51L. I 'y t MOM5E0 U5E. OF 1/CID J12RTI,TITLE N.OF ME COT COLS `FAD SNC•/1•I FbrTEO- - AT/TOTAL nFORv SNE RAN REVIEW.SECTION 1-3163 t.— -. -. _ DEN5n,ALLOYED. TOW UNr5 FER ACRE • 91 1 1 ,1 91 I -,D, 4 DENSITT ED. •'.D NRISI ACRE SE • ' HEIGHT LMh 354/LIAR F S DPIFS eLy , - , _� f[CO Veep SETDACR tDPIRN. - . .I Tyre \ I V B9•9 10E0/ 190,OII MDE YIPUSETDACr< 120-MN EitLEVLF.WA 8D000 L-.GFN3'CS .._L. ...--. ._-____.I ND ' L i ' , �-"'1 ._. .._._-...-_-.._ rSPEeA YARD SETMO.(TOT AL). 15-0 ARN. D REAR I ARO SETDACh 6'4 NFL lFl. raro.0 ._-_.._.A. _ 1,1 / ACCESSORY EWILDIA:55D 05'41.RN 'A' rn'2OD: "YP.OARI'alzT PLAN • ti CO 6DILOIIJII 1`( ALLOWED reWECTICIS INTO D.-1MO LDA PER FACADE LE55 DIAN b WIDE LW! IMIMMOMMIN FAGS^evs33 ' ;' : %Inl gOeF, i'i. '.. �E]r+urt4s 11 l EAVE PROJECTIONS: Sr�eEcrNSzoor 0404oED 14 0oa T 1� 12 �. W C' •h ^^- _ L I.Or COh!IGf e1LPVED ✓�I WRW0 00L0 GE 320.951 hi h VS'�1 rw R[S'STRI[ y tt(1 D' �' • '0.5 ,• .•.� CO H� • , FepDSED LOT UNERAGE. 0006 hi h.H2l OhELLING5 ,y 1602O F4 FE.aRCARPCRIS _!nl ,' '8 yr: '1 BLD(S. A r1 , ton TOT,aftlnNG COrt[0GE m I -li• �! 'r M. , III a I e-..� , } .1 MIL a ur.oT. . • '•' •OI ! L 1 hmERnOLIS 5DUICE[A/RAGE:Tit PPG FOODTRO.SIOEWALrS.RMEWAVS , NP ELEVATION • z�' • LI LJE----- • '! I .I 12 MIN.SeT6AGlc-� I I.--�1 l lurE[rIW551MFACE no.-o u9.Dp,,h...5Ti • Lq'.I:v• N@I•le'ley 60',. l '`5 4. I�\. EARRING rEmseED Ir,/vJ=uD ��-!^ _ JB9e.�63 2872PJ1 �.Q=W PARKING rR0.YED Tr0041Dfi MCI-OZY ONTffhST r0PA'GI T i ' 1 k ____ ^} -_ _ -- - �__�Y FAxFJW DRFJ7Ffq'M 1 F I __ __ ; - 1MAO*. 2a N89e 1+,16 BcO�•Ig j ! •�i , R• I f I 1.14 ___ z!.��__ _ - L r nrwuer r. DD1Ij j; t'F'r' i A 1 y SvtlS+II5ru1D. n ]. .- ..__. ._ .bJ�_._- -_ .. \. 1\j I I • - `- 1 ,, 5!HL Strf f/JVPIR D V27!61•aAA:4L) /- ll -r T-r�I-/ I b_{ '-�-1. •- _ _ _ _� 1 C._� J �, - 1 I ANpSGyTf 1'L Fin'eF.rabt 5tOD eq h. W '' 11 l ( 1r •• ' I L fog _ - � �1y i ll LA f, . i L .__l f j __ —tL \ �'4Y`VDT-D0( t.s '-MN.Ip.1,11' ' ERw.rEUWm'JMr +Dt.rp's H ,m • I \ .:; -1 - l +,,..0,r__ 5 YARb -- NYpRl5FFL4D 5LOPE5 NfAoAq R K Y GYIES dZREE �; L. I y . LIB 1 s �.OF7• d it -• .rD: LLJe . I EL 15•FLOOR p'/m.,1`•. .: -t i U- D, 1. `,•' �{``l 1 11 IFGEHD a= d'{�v 1 It 1 r• ,1 - --. l t'' , S -1\ • I'1 z V I l I -- , `..-'\ t ` 8 FTC5i1I CRADE5 S ---- mr-RAee ]H RACE-A EO \ 4' I• .71-•-r i,1...-1-i_i 1 r-LJ EL lernieroo• .1 V.•• t, Yc EASmIG 1EGErAMM LINE I j �, I — -.G VEN.g2D'\ 1 .� --- be u u'0 . '�`,� � I'I \-aD -lI-- -�l _=:; ay,.-I _--(-I • Ii NSOI�I'..G \ '.'.e�• ' l -1 -y': .REVToN sFmrdeADE i z=-,< w I`,; •P• /_ l=-__Tr•.71T- t l' ')1:- 1.� � � i_ • M Al¢tlT2T = ' "A4• 1 h'�1 1 t/ \� I,.I I��1 }��l' 1 -_�" l 1 .2 u i 3 �1 / s"F \t' --___�/ ( , .T� \ I -PixmF-I _ _ `d-�yl -��;•:11 1` `I1�- • :1,_r PratNG LOT�TIND•>7 _ w Y i w • I, '• 1 DPP• a• 1 Ri , 1'', + 1 3Cfi_'_., .• •��'c ,y;.oe l --,-� \ INDATES CAREC'RT - Dom- 9 1 I eG ftDM'- l'' W4PirER N W.K o I'11, N.'\ J1•..ea:m ..'.\�•r'�•I: i, 1 I u.eAed.'/I 1i_ r ,+ • Js'_.1 �f'�'Glc�sa�I° l ' ] _��"l_ 2-' ,y. • ,.v r 1—'F1 4 l'I .I �. 'i p _ w et 11• { CONCRETE RET,NAIG WALL _.1 0 tl y:?'*.- 1 DT FLOOR fpDLT` I, ., _- _ •rl... I ��F`. _ —_ ' ,,,. I 1G L (r �', _ I �. \\\ RGQERY/ENC NEERED - __ d v �H I I �- ( ,l A G C- L�I - • 1 JECT L RETMNNG WALL � �• tt 4)1f. i 11\ I - .l�. y1\ ..-. -a ,..�i i--•= ` I $ l :l 19 BUILDING DATA • > _ .t l `\I 1 c. - tc btee-;—• T i 11 tI g - . L lu ' ` 1c t ., . `t1.W DSaO, •' £. AE.c rl.'15' j 4 "-..a. V3' "1 . v'- 1• 1t11 i- 1 - 1 f'1 F+ LL � , INV •SEE A..L CASEMENT FL 1 A � . • �, �\ 1` G LI.. ._.. i{ - y..L1 , D�S(JT37 1 lr sr FL, a .ve i g -e4 'e-y- -1 ,5 rO30°'T'' L `GJ 1-77-Tr' 1 ' ;• I -.,(I Lit �Id4 .d.•.i , o_ 1- '1 TOT w wmD ( A q`��l`��r��•� FJ. F`-••A 1. •-i Y ! 15 • D BASEUENr Ft 2 z 3204 •d ,'-TTS� 1,.-\^• ./ ..I ,-J.I...J ! i ��_>�� '1 t� Sr FL A 6app '` tT,r. •.tE4i., \ . ' -ti't l 2F, vs: 11 L' `': ` 1 ''1 ,.I.•o , `,L, 't.. 1 T. ° I-/. - .-,` ?�'"�„�tn i�,2'L 8' -a �i znO FL A— -- Gaoe • 1 • t} +1.1" r. . ' ,.�'WnH 4Rleiact e¢eT sa6L ll` ` i \ 1, ma v w mm ! - :•A., tom '. ..-1 1 I I j rl I I:y _.�Q ,I 1 '1 e I amrL —. 2esz \s` 1 �_,�� ! '� � LI�1..1.._._� �.I.I_.; {tl_�1� MO FL PD52 ) �• \T_,'.) -.l; \•.'1. �,4-f- t.lnF_v.1- t- TOTAL Lx IMOD I , -�'"'.. �'- {'Ll-+.1� `• Ae _ ' D TOR -- 1026 • t014 : IEe• • r012\ \ 5704 --• \• rA cSroR ale/sro A 5701 ... • J �—,�-i 6 Q.'y • 6 PLO, D 5-l0a 1.' Ir .$ TOTAL znRR rRFO -- --- I' ,, sea.ov' _-t,• ��'-�, -- • '• \ l Tomoosr/I a a 22 ------ L\ A -. ' •� •,. - - r4 ,• 'l 1l TOTAL AREA DDDn 20 l_ i. GEL] c.6.t l' • �'`_' - , • 1 t mALAun I Iva ' F(AA1,6l. 103.60, •'' •..�•-^+-: �^ STORAGE •�.t'.le. 2w1 SITE,PLAN A PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN A 00 { • `• F°-la o Tm" �" 6-.- n;�t__:___1� -- RAPING Al REC.IXRG- WO TOTAL AREA I I I5DDD2 i FILO"` L —_^_� i— CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIUNG On the 21.04i1 day of Apvd. , 1996, I deposited in the mails.of the United States, a sealed envelope containing evt ael'e_vAntifLittilrIAS documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing dict.ZicAKA4d-urvN CUANt ___GAstorrerqatitsigh- INAVC ter kletti "Dr-iTZ AIS\neine.v. Ta!,\J 'D.‘i1.11-trt.rvaln of• cL Rolu.V0-1.1:ZczoLLAtem iNvide.Kottl •De_r-T cf --"Tisytsreof-litair. —1:Zuasne.y\-\ C of Seartt\e_ Dw,javvL Ites4Itan --temck trY\a‘,c_.ovvi 4‘SInev‘es 6u.c.WesLO-ot lyucktatA "lerkik, Te-Zta.c. Tttsr.i. 1=bk&lex". (Signature of Sender) 5101tAtitk. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING • 5 0- I certify that* I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sl-AJD4194- / ‘ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. •,)!' • Dated: 1!/d6 //4 _ Notary P lic in and f r the State of IftkosWiracriz.. ;_., Notary rint) • My appointment expires: b y9er . C I:.•.,, ''''' • Project Name - -14% Cpcnol, Ar4s Project Number. NOTARY.DOC CITY )F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 24, 1996 . Washington State - Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 SUBJECT: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on April 23, 1996: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS LUA-96-038,SA,ECF : The applicant seeks environmental review and site plan approval to construct 106 one and two bedroom apartments. The proposed structures will be a maximum of three stories in height. There will be seven buildings with 10 to 20 dwelling units in the building. Location: Rainier Avenue South & South 119th _ Street. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on May 14, 1996. Following the end of the comment/appeal period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. If you have questions, please call me at (206)277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, %��G,/ n Mark R. P , AICP Project Ma ager cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Sue Rumery, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Rita Perstac, Puget Power AGNCYLTR.DOC • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,25%post consumer ti } CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-038,SA,ECF APPLICANT: The Leitzke Architects PROJECT NAME: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site plan approval to construct 106 one and two bedroom apartments. The proposed structures will be a maximum of three stories in height. There will be seven buildings with 10 to 20 dwelling units in the building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Rainier Avenue South &South 119th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 p.m. on May 14, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. PUBLICATION DATE: APRIL 29, 1996 DATE OF DECISION: APRIL 23, 1996 SIGNATURES: ifftffelea----- AS Gregg it me an,Administrator DATE P De artment of Planning/Building/Public/Buildin /Public Works 7 1—ilZ / c ss Sam Chastain,Administrator DATE Community Service Department Lee‘Item Fire Chie DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC 40 CITY JF RENTON "LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department • Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • April 24, 1996 • Mr. Steve Leitzke The Leitzke Architects 6102- 142nd Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98006 SUBJECT: Renton Crown Apartments Project No. LUA-96-038,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Leitzke: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on April 23, 1996, decided that your project may be issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: See enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than-issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required 15 day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The required 14 day appeal period will run concurrently with the comment period. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on May 14, 1996. Following the end of the comment/appeal period, the City will finalize its Determination, unless comments received require a reevaluation. WAC 197-11-660 states that the responsibility for implementation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project, any mitigation measure established by the ERC not directly attributable.to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g.,the Public Works Division) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have , specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. Appeal procedures and mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at.the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. ,Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, .Renton, Washington, on May 21, 1996 at 9:00-AM to consider the Site Approval. If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(206) 277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, • Mark R. Pyw CP Project Ma er cc: Kohl Excavating, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan/Owners; ,Parties of Record DNSMLT R.DOC -, 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 . CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION N•(S): LUA-96-038;SA,ECF APPLICANT: The Leitzke Architects { PROJECT NAM;: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site plan approval to construct 106 one and two bedroom apartments. The proposed structures will be a maximum of three stories in height. There will be seven buildings with 10 to 20 dwelling units in the building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Rainier Avenue South &South 119th Street MITIGATION MEASURES: { 1. The applicant shall record a Native Growth Protection Easement on the steep slopes on the south and west portions of the project site. The easement shall be recorded prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. 2. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan that includes the steep slope areas of the site. • The plans shall demonstrate a mixture of tree, shrubs,and groundcover on the steep slopes. The revised landscape plan shall be submitted a minimum of ten days prior to the public hearing on the site plan. 3. The applicant shall be required to install either a wetvault or a wetpond as part of the storm water quality system. Plans to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division shall be required as part of the submittal for the construction permits. 4. The applicant shall submit a Parks Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. This mitigation fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. 5. The applicant shall submit a Transportation mitigation fee of$75.00 per trip generated by the apartment complex. This fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. 6. The applicant shall submit a Fire Prevention mitigation fee at the rate of$388 per multi-family dwelling unit and$0.52 per square foot for the recreation building. These fees shall be submitted prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. • MITMEAS.DOC/ CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-038,SA,ECF APPLICANT: The Leitzke Architects PROJECT NAME: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site plan approval to construct 106 one and two bedroom apartments. The proposed structures will be a maximum of three stories in height. There will be seven buildings with 10 to 20 dwelling units in the building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Rainier Avenue South &South 119th Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall record a Native Growth Protection Easement on the steep slopes on the south and west portions of the project site. The easement shall be recorded prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. 2. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan that includes the steep slope areas of the site. The plans shall demonstrate a mixture of tree, shrubs, and groundcover on the steep slopes. The revised landscape plan shall be submitted a minimum of ten days prior to the public hearing on the site plan. 3. The applicant shall be required to install either a wetvault or a wetpond as part of the storm water quality system. Plans to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division shall be required as part of the submittal for the construction permits. 4. The applicant shall submit a Parks Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. This mitigation fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. 5. The applicant shall submit a Transportation mitigation fee of$75.00 per trip generated by the apartment complex. This fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. 6. The applicant shall submit a Fire Prevention mitigation fee at the rate of$388 per multi-family dwelling unit and$0.52 per square foot for the recreation building. These fees shall be submitted prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. MITMEAS.DOC/ CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-038,SA,ECF APPLICANT: The Leitzke Architects PROJECT NAME: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site plan approval to construct 106 one and two bedroom apartments. The proposed structures will be a maximum of three stories in height. There will be seven buildings with 10 to 20 dwelling units in the building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Rainier Avenue South &South 119th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General Notes 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. Parks and Recreation 1. The proposed street tree landscape improvements along Rainier Ave.need to be maintained by the owner/applicant. 2. Rainier Ave.has a stripped bike lane in this area. The contractor should post signage and excise caution during the construction phase of the project. Renton Police Department 1. It is anticipated that an apartment complex of this size will generate 97.52 police calls for service annually. The applicant has proposed excellent security/crime prevention services and this will have a big impact on reducing the estimated number of calls. 2. This area of Renton routinely experiences vehicle-related crimes such as auto theft and theft from vehicles. The Police Department recommends an electronic gated entry to the property. Apartment complexes that have electronic gates suffer minimal to no crime. 3. The applicant needs to be aware of the construction area thefts going on in Renton. Construction materials and tools need to be secured when not in use. Lighting the site during the construction phase of this project will also help to reduce theft. Renton Crown Apartments LUA-96-038,SA,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued)] Page 2 Fire Department 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 2,000 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required for each building. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structures and one hydrant is required within 300-feet of structures. 2. An approved sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout all structures, except the recreation building. 3. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout all the structures, including the recreation building. 4. A looped fire apparatus access road is required behind buildings E,F, and G. Construction Services 1. A licensed architect and a structural engineer are required for the preparation of plans submitted for building permits. 2. The soils report will need to be revised and submitted to Construction Services at the time that the applications for building permits are submitted. Total adherence to the soils report is mandatory. 3. Structural fill requires a separate permit from Construction Services. Sewer Utility 1. This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. 2. This project is located in the West Lake Washington Sewer Basin. 3. There is not a City of Renton sanitary sewer main available to serve this site. 4. Sanitary Sewer system needs to be negotiated between the City of Renton and Bryn Mawr. The existing agreement in principle signed by the parties in 1989 will need to be reevaluated due to conditions existing in the City of Renton Sewer System. 5. Sanitary Sewer System Development Fees (SDS)fees will be a part of the negotiations between the City and Bryn Mawr. Water Utility: 1. This site is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. 2. This site is in the Downtown 196 Pressure Zone. 3. There is a 16"dead end water line available in Rainier Ave N. 4. This area is not identified on the Comprehensive Water plan. 5. Per the City of Renton Fire Marshall,this project has a fireflow of 2,000 GPM. 6. Fireflows that exceed 2500 GPM require a looped watermain system around the building. This is additional information for the applicant in case the buildings are revised such that the fireflow requirement increases. 7. All fire hydrants must be capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM. 8. Watermains are to be located in the driving lanes. ADVNOTES.DOC/ t Renton Crown Apartments LUA-96-038,SA,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued)) Page 3 9. System Development Fees (SDS)fees of$0.113 per square foot gross area but not less than$850 are required if they have not previously been paid. DRAINAGE: 1. Drainage system shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM. 2. A Level 1 Downstream analysis has been submitted and reviewed by the Plan Review Section. 3. Direct discharge will not be allowed due to lack of capacity of the downstream system. Detention is required. 4. If there is 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious area subject to vehicular use, a Biofiltration Swale is required. 5. A site visit was made. The pipe in S 121st is a 24"and was running full at the time of the site visit. 6. The Surface Water System Development Charge of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious area but not less than$385 applies to the proposed project. Street Improvements: 1. A variance from the Board of Public Works is required for a driveway approach in excess of 8%. 2. Curbs,gutters, sidewalks, and street lighting are required to meet City standards. If the existing curbs,gutter, sidewalks and street lighting meet the City standards then no improvements are required. General Plan Review Comments 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer in accordance with City of Renton Drafting Standards. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvement is 5%of the first$100,000, of the estimated construction costs; 4%of anything over$100,000,but less than$200,000, and 3%of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. ADVNOTES.DOC/ CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-038,SA,ECF APPLICANT: The Leitzke Architects PROJECT NAME: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site plan approval to construct 106 one and two bedroom apartments. The proposed structures will be a maximum of three stories in height. There will be seven buildings with 10 to 20 dwelling units in the building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Rainier Avenue South &South 119th Street • Advisory Notes to Applicant:The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General Notes - 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. Parks and Recreation 1. The proposed street tree landscape improvements along Rainier Ave.need to be maintained by the owner/applicant. 2. Rainier Ave. has a stripped bike lane in this area. The contractor should post signage and excise caution during the construction phase of the project. Renton Police Department - 1. It is anticipated that an apartment complex of this size will generate 97.52 police calls for service annually. The applicant has proposed excellent security/crime prevention services and this will have a big impact on reducing the estimated number of calls. 2. This area of Renton routinely experiences vehicle-related crimes such as auto theft and theft from vehicles. The Police Department recommends an electronic gated entry to the property. Apartment complexes that have electronic gates suffer minimal to no crime. 3. The applicant needs to be aware of the construction area thefts going on in Renton. Construction materials and tools need to be secured when not in use. Lighting the site during the construction phase of this project will also help to reduce theft. Renton Crown Apartments LUA-96-038,SA,EC Advisory Notes(Con 'Tined)] Page 2 Fire Department 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 2,000 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required for each building. �I One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of theproposed structures and one hydrant is required within 300-feet of structures. 2. An approved sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout all structures, except the recreation building. 3. An approved fi:e alarm system is required to be installed throughout all the structures, including the recreation building. 4. A looped fire a paratus access road is required behind buildings E,F, and G. Construction Se ces 1. A licensed arc 'tect and a structural engineer are required for the preparation of plans submitted for building permis. 2. The soils repoi4 will need to be revised and submitted to Construction Services at the time that the applications for building permits are submitted. Total adherence to the soils report is mandatory. 3. Structural fill requires a separate permit from Construction Services. Sewer Utility 1. This project is ixot located in the Aquifer Protection,Zone. 2. This project is liocated in the West Lake Washington Sewer Basin. 3. There is not a City of Renton sanitary sewer main available to serve this site. 4. Sanitary Sewer system needs.to be negotiated between the City of Renton and Bryn Mawr. The existing agreelnent in principle signed by the parties'in 1989 will need to be reevaluated due to conditions exis ing in the City of Renton Sewer System, 5. Sanitary Sewer System Development Fees (SDS)fees will be a part of the negotiations between the City and Bryn awr. - • '1 Water Utility: 1. This site is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. 2. This site is in the Downtown 196 Pressure Zone. 3. There is a 16"dead end water line available in Rainier Ave N. 4. This area is not identified on the Comprehensive Water plan. 5. Per the City of Renton Fire Marshall,this project ha's a fireflow of 2,000 GPM. 6. Fireflows that exceed 2500 GPM require a looped watermain system around the building. This is additional information for the applicant in case the buildings are revised such that the fireflow requirement inc eases. - 7. All fire hydrantis must be capable of delivering a.minimum of 1,000 GPM. 8. Watermains are to be located in the driving lanes., • ADVNOTES.DOC/ Renton Crown Apartments LUA-96-038,SA,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued)] Page 3 9. System Development Fees (SDS)fees of$0.113 per square foot gross area but not less than$850 • are required if they have not previously been paid. DRAINAGE: 1. Drainage system shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM. 2. A Level 1 Downstream analysis has been submitted and reviewed by the Plan Review Section. 3. Direct discharge will not be allowed due to lack of capacity of the downstream system. Detention is required. 4. If there is 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious area subject to vehicular use, a Biofiltration Swale is required. 5. A site visit was made. The pipe in S 121st is a 24"and was running full at the time of the site visit. 6. The Surface Water System Development Charge of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious area but not less than$385 applies to the proposed project. Street Improvements: 1.. A variance from the Board of Public Works is required,for a driveway approach in excess of 8%. 2. .Curbs,gutters, sidewalks, and street lighting are required to meet City standards. If the existing curbs,gutter, sidewalks and street lighting meet the City standards then no improvements are required. General Plan Review Comments , 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer in accordance with City of Renton Drafting Standards. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvement is 5%of the first$100,000, of the estimated construction costs;4%of anything over$100,000,but less than$200,000, and 3%of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. • • ADVNOTES.DOC/ NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS LUA-96-038,SA,ECF The applicant seeks environmental review and site plan approval to construct 106 one and two bedroom apartments. The proposed structures will be a maximum of three stories in height. There will be seven buildings with 10 to 20 dwelling units in the building. Location: Rainier Avenue South &South 119th. The 15 day comment/14 day appeal periods for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 p.m. on May 14, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on May 21, 1996 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Publication Date: April 29, 1996 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot y • • • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS • LUA-99-005,SA,ECP The applicant seeks environmental review and site plan approval to construct 100 one end two bedroom apartments.The proposed structures will be a maximum of three Modes in height.There will be seven buildings with 10 to 20 dwelling units In the building. Location:Rainier Avenue South&South halts Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. n APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, ® YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON MAY 14,1998 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM.MAY 14.1998. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL,RENTON, WASHINGTON,ON MAY 21,1996 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE APPROVAL. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED,THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. IAN N7TH•calc, vi sww ....T..- 4 • ms ,yyppT,• h:. I j a:c�'��t ,it��7ru� y J r � '0. 51 lh r:'1 'A R '� rra sr I f aj k iv> • x hh e i l tzaoz vro Vitt:rm • s. hi, 120TN sr ��. r1��`11 t•.q teemsl7lY� ,5 =�.•:,:�...1`r(5 •— II. �smar 111 sr. it,e 4.tithtTR•c r _� 117 M ..,. : ta-;a rai-.16.;4.6":4cs�t .l • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. • DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file IdentifcatIon. - •' I CERTIFICATION • I, 5(;,,r v-tui .GI,C' - 2Y , hereby certify that• 3 copies of the above document were postedJ.y me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on Signed: SIVIA41...,,,XliaZglal • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary and purposes mentioned in the instrumen . ;�'�o 1,0- '.'s) Dated: 'ab L71/A 6‘ 1111 ,,, Notary blic in a or the State of WWs ip iio`': Notary rint) /1 .17 at-, My appointment expires: to/'f/C/ r NOTARY.DOC 14(3- ilin ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS LUA-96-038,SA,ECF The applicant seeks environmental review and site plan approval to construct 106 one and two bedroom apartments. The proposed structures will be a maximum of three stories in height. There will be seven buildings with 10 to 20 dwelling units in the building. Location: Rainier Avenue South & South 119th Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. . AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE-FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, XXX YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON MAY 14, 1996 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, MAY 14, 1996. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON MAY 21, 1996 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE APPROVAL. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF• THIS PUBLIC HEARING. 1's tiip n n`f' 'Iar '1i n aF rw„.e iw ails: e,' :if,u7Ly� w.'` .s '1t ri,7 is I�nn�i sZ�s a��j �Iyry �rs*uLe� •��y�yi ➢ I�n�o a • � �.J.' 51,'„_ .Fi n..Q .�:l1 i,) ■ II nlr.ffo sue"lul, ,!d '�,, n � n.• , hi r „., rn S.�C l;/�7TyH 'E$I VC A�1IPL. s 51N�1+�,1'a'1+s.l^�a�'+ � ',i �\'J�,,r',1' 1.r,P I"g l ,f' �I �, 1 C.u=!_ ..i. 7 I r.4, . 6K1�t\, z 'y la�l�Flil� � '; 'r i, I �� .,; : ,, _ •o_ Icy// -a a t�..•- R MR. , ',' SI p{1 yl 1181 f MtY�ll�yt `T : . --11 �, �i`•• _" ,'f��^J iC � M:YIIN -TA s's��yy :i..,._ �o I I�ulf`T'- . '''',0 6/ .3 F� z�IOLI��r� `f u Ae y `• N'rr.! M ', i a p9 �j��{ 14 nan va.Is,n•• .v 1" p �T hl sip a.n. f n n s : '3 Tii a'f..' s-7 }+'lais :A a n 1 Niiii l 1 all'Z•, In _ 1. K I'' ' ''"'--• t 3. 70 4, vim4 I a_ } uJ-P . ,... , NV 4,-tT-1,,7- - .. V 11 II _•, ra;l u■ r� {7j . •n '-.t''• �,Y `i� f� ', it 6,'9 .. 1tr1s'Srnsil� fa'�ii 'ii�iJalumn..n1 t, s,. r A!,s, I;f0 2S,.. I I U1 r�xn f1f.My;n Jl y11.. .: Il.�$. f/� f '1 nMn,a C 73 �: .1' .,.., UM Sb ...P -I o..ia7'.LILL1.1k_4!! ,_ v , 'a -4 ,S. MOTH SI ;m . : 31' l (!g w GOVI .oetK 3uor J su.aarrzx 4-, 'lJ �I., 'iY.� �� n- u: r�i5'. pergs; 1,., ,,. ,i, ,Ill1k ',nm .ftf appl��s,, ��!!j�y1„�,:fu*�.3"1 •-�-,,,;-___=ca'um J.lgl�(Miw� iea ecII,, '.11 mQIrt. , rl Jib LEI, �.�, -_ 1�',� • S /2/ST STs ;l. Fited r �a y s t I- C e tl �in s 1+s a Ni s _11_aa2 _ _L__r_ ___ __ucu_- i a /2/S , ., ., N ', ., . .1 .... 71.I.1.1,1 I..19 _ ,t: Kg- ya.i4;1rl �`;h1. 1t-I, � n, s • -- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION . e..the.. ro 0100P.MBER:when<:011in lOtil ro a.: .. ::... . ....:.......;,;>;::«><: <,;;:.,>.rigginig10.1010:010:040.01.00010100:.<:<.::.:::.:<..::...R.:.: :...::..::.:.... ....:.....:.::::.:...:.::..::..:::::.:....:..9. .:... . ....:.. . .c:file.::ltientiftcanon.:<:.:.:;::>�:�:>:;:.:::;:.: . STAFF City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE April 23, 1996 Project Name Renton Crown Apartments Applicant The Leitzke Architects File Number LUA-096-038,SA,ECF Project Manager Mark R. Pywell Project Description The applicant seeks environmental review and site plan approval to construct 106 one and two bedroom apartments. The proposed structures will be a maximum of three stories in height. There will be seven buildings with 10 to 20 dwelling units in the building. Project Location Rainier Avenue South& South 119th Street Exist. Bldg. Area gsf N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf 88092 sf Site Area 7.57 acres Total Building Area gsf 88092 sf RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance--Mitigated. 1 .,i s...: `1,-;,F:x /. . W1_; ` r ; k ,...u`..�... - . - _j H,t, 1Iv 5 , _ ., A',, 1, 9gg5JI 1�: V _1;1� `tom -•\ ` ---,_.r,.: " ,.a "' , '' nu f�1 ism Project Location Map _ ERCRPTDOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Env rental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS LUA-96-038,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF April 23,1996 Page 2 of 6 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall record a Native Growth Protection Easement on the steep slopes on the south and west portions of the project site. The easement shall be recorded prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. 2. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan that includes the steep slope areas of the site. The plans shall demonstrate a mixture of tree, shrubs, and groundcover on the steep slopes. The revised landscape plan shall be submitted a minimum of ten days prior to the public hearing on the site plan. 3. The applicant shall be required to install either a wetvault or a wetpond as part of the storm water quality system. Plans to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division shall be required as part of the submittal for the construction permits. 4. The applicant shall submit a Parks Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. This mitigation fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. 5. The applicant shall submit a Transportation mitigation fee of$75.00 per trip generated by the apartment complex. This fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. 6. The applicant shall submit a Fire Prevention mitigation fee at the rate of$388 per multi-family dwelling unit and$0.52 per square foot for the recreation building. These fees shall be submitted prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General Notes 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. Parks and Recreation 1. The proposed street tree landscape improvements along Rainier Ave. need to be maintained by the owner/applicant. 2. Rainier Ave. has a stripped bike lane in this area. The contractor should post signage and excise caution during the construction phase of the project. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Envi rental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS LUA-96-038,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF April 23,1996 Page 3 of 6 Renton Police Department 1. It is anticipated that an apartment complex of this size will generate 97.52 police calls for service annually. The applicant has proposed excellent security/crime prevention services and this will have a big impact on reducing the estimated number of calls. 2. This area of Renton routinely experiences vehicle-related crimes such as auto theft and theft from vehicles. The Police Department recommends an electronic gated entry to the property. Apartment complexes that have electronic gates suffer minimal to no crime. 3. The applicant needs to be aware of the construction area thefts going on in Renton. Construction materials and tools need to be secured when not in use. Lighting the site during the construction phase of this project will also help to reduce theft. Fire Department 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 2,000 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required for each building. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structures and one hydrant is required within 300-feet of structures. 2. An approved sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout all structures, except the recreation building. 3. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout all the structures, including the recreation building. 4. A looped fire apparatus access road is required behind buildings E, F, and G. Construction Services 1. A licensed architect and a structural engineer are required for the preparation of plans submitted for building permits. 2. The soils report will need to be revised and submitted to Construction Services at the time that the applications for building permits are submitted. Total adherence to the soils report is mandatory. 3. Structural fill requires a separate permit from Construction Services. Sewer Utility 1. This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. 2. This project is located in the West Lake Washington Sewer Basin. 3. There is not a City of Renton sanitary sewer main available to serve this site. 4. Sanitary Sewer system needs to be negotiated between the City of Renton and Bryn Mawr. The existing agreement in principle signed by the parties in 1989 will need to be reevaluated due to conditions existing in the City of Renton Sewer System. 5. Sanitary Sewer System Development Fees (SDS)fees will be a part of the negotiations between the City and Bryn Mawr. Water Utility: 1. This site is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. 2. This site is in the Downtown 196 Pressure Zone. 3. There is a 16"dead end water line available in Rainier Ave N. 4. This area is not identified on the Comprehensive Water plan. 5. Per the City of Renton Fire Marshall,this project has a fireflow of 2,000 GPM. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Em nental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS LUA-96-038,SA,ECF .REPORT AND DECISION OF April 23,1996 Page 4 of 6 6. Fireflows that exceed 2500 GPM require a looped watermain system around the building. This is additional information for the applicant in case the buildings are revised such that the fireflow requirement increases. 7. All fire hydrants must be capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM. 8. Watermains are to be located in the driving lanes. 9. System Development Fees (SDS)fees of$0.113 per square foot gross area but not less than$850 are required if they have not previously been paid. DRAINAGE: 1. Drainage system shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM. 2. A Level 1 Downstream analysis has been submitted and reviewed by the Plan Review Section. 3. Direct discharge will not be allowed due to lack of capacity of the downstream system. Detention is required. 4. If there is 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious area subject to vehicular use, a Biofiltration Swale is required. 5. A site visit was made. The pipe in S 121 st is a 24"and was running full at the time of the site visit. 6. The Surface Water System Development Charge of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious area but not less than $385 applies to the proposed project. Street Improvements: 1. A variance from the Board of Public Works is required for a driveway approach in excess of 8%. 2. Curbs,gutters, sidewalks, and street lighting are required to meet City standards. If the existing curbs,gutter, sidewalks and street lighting meet the City standards then no improvements are required. General Plan Review Comments 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer in accordance with City of Renton Drafting Standards. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvement is 5%of the first$100,000, of the estimated construction costs; 4%of anything over $100,000, but less than$200,000,and 3%of anything over$200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? 1. Earth Impacts: The subject site is located along the west side of Rainier Avenue South, approximately in the vicinity of 119th Street South. The property is irregularly shaped and is approximately 7.5 acres in size. The east boundary of the property borders approximately 530 feet of Rainier Ave. South. An existing warehouse and office development are immediately adjacent to the western and southern boundaries of the property. There are residential developments along the top of the bluff that borders the west and northwesterly sides of the site. ERCRPT.DOC City ofRenton PB/PWDepartment Envi ,ental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS LUA-96-038,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF April 23,1996 Page 5 of 6 The predominant topographic features include a ravine and the bluff that generally trend north to south along the west side of the site. A small drainage course runs to the north along the bottom of the ravine at the base of the bluff. The site generally slopes down to the north with a maximum elevation change of approximately 90 feet. It is evident that the site has experienced some disturbance in the form of benched cuts along the middle and lower east portions of the site. It appears some fill and slide debris have also been deposited primarily along a portion of the north side of the site and portions of the east sides of the site. An abandoned asphalt road runs along a portion of the north side of the site and accesses the upper bench trending east to west through the middle of the site. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical engineering study,prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. and dated March 21, 1996. Construction Services has stated that the report will need to be amended and submitted with the application for building permits. The recommendations contained in the final geolotechnical report will become mandatory conditions as part of the building permit. The plans submitted by the applicant demonstrate grading on some of the steep slopes in order to stabilize the slopes. Enhancement activities are allowed on steep slopes. The applicant will need to record a Native Growth Protection Easement on the steep slopes. The applicant will also need to prepare a manual for the future land owners to use. This manual shall explain the need to protect the slopes and also how to perform maintenance activities in this area. Once the grading has been completed the applicant should be required to landscape the slopes. The present plan does not indicate any landscaping in this area. The applicant shall provide a revised landscape plan for the project which includes a mixture of trees, shrubs and groundcover for this area. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall record a Native Growth Protection Easement on the steep slopes on the south and west portions of the project site. The easement shall be recorded prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan that includes the steep slope areas of the site. The plans shall demonstrate a mixture of tree, shrubs, and groundcover on the steep slopes. The revised landscape plan shall be submitted a minimum of ten days prior to the public hearing on the site plan. Nexus: Environmental Ordinance(SEPA); Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance; Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance,Landscape Ordinance. 2. Air Impacts: Air impacts would include dust and vehicle exhaust during the construction phase of the project. Vehicle exhaust and emissions from the apartment heating units could have adverse impacts. Dust will be mitigated by the requirement for the applicant to sprinkler the site during the construction phase of the project. Exhaust from vehicles and heating source are already controlled by state and federal regulations. No further mitigation measures are required. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: N/A 3. Surface Water Impacts: The applicant is proposing to construct a bio-filtration swale on the northeast corner of the property. The applicant is required to provide a storm water system in accordance with the King County Surface Water design manual. City staff is concerned that on this particular site, due to the existing and proposed topography, that the minimum requirements will not mitigate all of the anticipated adverse impacts. In order to completely mitigate any adverse impacts to the water quality the applicant will need to install either a wetvault or a wetpond. ERCRPT.DOC ' City of Renton PB/PW Department Ern nental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS LUA-96-038,SA,ECF ?EPORTAND DECISION OF April 23,1996 Page 6 of 6 Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to install either a wetvault or a wetpond as part of the storm water quality system. Plans to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division shall be required as part of the submittal application for the construction permits. Nexus: Storm and Surface Water Drainage Ordinance, Environmental Ordinance(SEPA) 4. Parks and Recreation Impacts: The applicant is proposing to construct 106 single and two bedroom apartment units within the proposed project. Although the applicant is proposing to construct an on-site recreation building, the future residents will still need to use the existing and proposed recreation facilities located throughout the City. In order to mitigate the adverse impacts to the City of Renton's recreation facilities the applicant will need to submit a mitigation fee of$354.51 per dwelling unit. The recreation building can be used to reduce the total fee by one-third. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a Parks Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. This mitigation fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. This fee may be reduced by one-third by the Parks Department. Nexus: Environmental Ordinance(SEPA) S. Transportation Impacts: The apartment complex will generate approximately 700 trips per day. This will have a significant impact on the local streets unless mitigated. The City has adopted an impact fee of$75.00 per trip to mitigate the anticipated adverse impacts. This fee will need to be submitted prior to the issuance of building/construction permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a Transportation mitigation fee of$75.00 per trip generated by the apartment complex. This,fee shall be submitted prior-to the issuance of construction/building permits. Nexus: Environmental Ordinance(SEPA) 6. Fire Prevention Bureau Impacts: The proposed apartment complex will have an impact on the City's Fire Departments ability to respond to calls for emergency services. The installation of the code-required improvements will off-set this impact. The City has also adopted a mitigation fee of $388.00 per dwelling unit and $0.52 per square foot for the recreation building to completely mitigate the impact on the Fire Department. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a Fire Prevention mitigation fee at the rate of$388 per multi-family dwelling unit and$0.52 per square foot for the recreation building. These fees shall be submitted prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. Nexus: Environmental Ordinance(SEPA) E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. _X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report~. ERCRPT.DOC ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE APRIL 23, 1996 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Sa Chastain, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jim Hanson & Mike Kattermann Meeting Date: ,Tuesda April 23 1996 y Time: 9:00 AM Location: Third Floor Conference Room Agenda listed below. Renton Crown Apartments (New) (Pywell/5586) LUA-96-038,SA,ECF The applicant seeks environmental review and site plan approval to construct a 106 one and two bedroom apartments. The proposed structures will be a maximum of three stories in height. There will be seven buildings with 10 to 20 dwelling units in the building. Location: Rainier Avenue South & South 119th Street. Valley View Estates (New) (Pywell/5586) LUA-95-207,PP,ECF The applicant seeks approval to subdivide 8.4 acres into 34 lots for single-family residential development. The lots will range in size from 4,500 SF to approximately 12,250 SF. Location: 2100 Shattuck Avenue South. Springside Building (New) (Henning/6186) LUA-96-039,SA,SM,ECF Applicant requests administrative Site Plan Approval and environmental review for development of a 3.11 acre site. The development would consist of an approximate 43,000 square foot building with the possible addition of up to 5,000 square feet as mezzanine in two separate areas. The building would be suitable for office, warehouse and industrial use. Since the site is located within 200 feet of Springbrook Creek, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must also be obtained. Location: West end of the cul-de-sac on SW 39th Street. cc: J.Covington,Executive Assistant to the Mayor L.Warren,City Attorney (R) F. Kaufman,Hearing Examiner S.Carlson,Economic Development Director (R) J.Gray,Fire Prevention A.Larson,Fire Prevention (R) P.Pierce,P/B/PW Admin City G.-.. nton Department of Planning/Building/Pu:;....'Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:iC arv.% ser4KLO COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 11, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-038,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 27, 1996 -rY OF RENTOP APPLICANT: LEITZKE ARCHITECTS(STEVE LEITZKE) PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS WORK ORDER NO: 78075A 1996 LOCATION: RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH&SOUTH 119TH STREET SITE AREA: 7.57 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 98,952.SCI mat dam J VISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks approval to construct a 106 unit apartment complex on a 7.57 acre site. The project includes seven buildings containing 10 to 20 dwelling units each and a recreation building. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Licaa L tr6.(f Ala 3 TR fv1),/9L 036)n .- 'kpQotit O . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 5 b[L5 't I)U P.1 To Q� i 1 r i s /i1 uk TI f f! L L t1DO PUitit5 A L J / Ria 1b lL k01-1UfIci TO Tii‘JoIL.5 flyALT l5 111A160A t0 ft RMQl)i4.5 R SVARfig pa [1; W e evi ed this p ication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas e itio i f 's nee ed to properly assess this proposal. 1 In 1, 5 Si ature of Director or Authorized Representative Date D APP.DOC Rev.10/93 PROPERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEW if.yo- r 1/) y (,• ® DEVELOPMENT APPLIC 1 ON REVIEW SHEET 0 PI REVIEW ROUTING SLIP ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL CHE....IST REVIEW S 'ET 0 ��'-'- /� �' OTHER ra APPLICANT: ,'L t�iC C'Ar.1A xJ( �KC ✓ Q/ (' J v«- -- RECEIVED FROM AT/I JOB ADDRESS: ' C/ d-W ig-II_ A�Jf- l�/ WO// ( rnCAJ ure!f� GREEN# NATURE OF WORK: �TmpJ C Rr uJ A) .�f39,27 7"S Id1r Cl SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION g SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED Cl SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 VICINITY MAP O NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES 0 FRONT FOOTAGE 0 OTHER O VESTED 0 NOT VESTED CI This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review/ dated 0 PARENT PM/(subject to change)_ SUBJECT PROPERTY PM/ //ROWO- 120 7A 9/6/3ff.33/8s3 0 King Co.Tax Acctl(new) 3RG513f7v9/ua It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the eveloper/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements.etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. _SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER . Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER Special Assessment District/WATER ^- Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER 0— Joint Use Agreement(METRO) Local Improvement District Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS _ I .- I • I , SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE.-WATER #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE 0 Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) ® Never Pd SQ.FTG. Single family residential$850/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park Apartment, Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x ./c,/, 5`f (,60 .00 Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq. ft.of property(not less than$850.00)X • Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter R,eoo GYM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER 0 Pd Prey. ❑ Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) ® Never Pd Single family residential dwelling unit$585/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x Apartment, Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x /G6. $ 37, 100 .c: 0 Commercial/Industrial, $0.078/sq. ft. of property(not less than$585.00)x REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New-Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER 0 Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) El Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x All other properties$0.129/sq ft of new impervious area of property x(not less t 385.00) I9 5_2 p /2 76 9' I PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ /3 sr Qa y, 5( �yit . ‘1"`" (////Y� Sig lure of Reviewing AuthorityDATE 1 vl " o. *If subject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept.for paid/un-paid status. ' **The square footage figures used are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only. 1 c:/template/fceapp/tgb EFFECTIVE July 16,1995/Ord.Nos.4506,4507,4508,4525,and 4526 A • c re F C O ( City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:T{vp_. 1JJeA".' COMMENTS DUE: APRIL,1/1.0996 f;`� �A_, " ° +rat:LEp7- APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-038,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: �Ii�RCH52971Ad 96ra,-n,. APPLICANT: LEITZKE ARCHITECTS(STEVE LEITZKE) PROJECT MANAGER: M,A1� K PrYWELL �t xtl 4I Oki PROJECT TITLE: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS WORK ORDER NO: 78075 LOCATION: RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH&SOUTH 119TH STREET ' , SITE AREA: 7.57 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 98,952 SQ.FT. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks approval to construct a 106 unit apartment complex on a 7.57 acre site. The project includes seven buildings containing 10 to 20 dwelling units each and a recreation building. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 572 a. a-C—.- PIA g_aAijvi,, 0,L1,4 ) /96 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. f` 7;(1"..7. Signature of Director or Authorized Representativ/ Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 Ormt � CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1996 TO: Mark Pywell, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Code-Related Comments for Renton Crown Apartments 1 . The preliminary fire flow required is 2,000 gpm. Two fire hydrants are required for each building. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structures and one fire hydrant is required within 300-feet of the structures. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $388 per multi-family unit, and $0.52 per square foot of building for the recreation building: 106 units x 388 = $41,128.00. 1,460 square feet x $0.52 = $759.20 These fees are payable at the time of building permit issuance. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout all the structures, except the recreation building. 4. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout all the structures, including the recreation building. 5. A looped fire apparatus access road is required behind buildings E, F and G. CT:js Crown CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: April 10, 1996 TO: Mark Pywell FROM: Arneta Henninger X6198 Vik SUBJECT: RENTON CROWN APTS RAINIER AVE S. & S 119TH ST I have reviewed the green folder application for this project which is located in the NE 1/4 7-23-5 and have the following comments: SEWER: • This project is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. • This project is located in the West Lake Washington Sewer. • There is not a City of Renton sanitary sewer main available to serve this site. • Sanitary Sewer system needs to be negotiated between the City of Renton and Bryn Mawr. The existing agreement in principle signed by the parties in 1989 will need to be reevaluated due to conditions existing in the City of Renton Sewer System. • Sanitary Sewer System Development Fees (SDS) fees will be a part of the negotiations between the City and Bryn Mawr. WATER: • This site is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. • This site is in the Downtown 196 Pressure Zone. • There is a 16" dead end water line available in Rainier Ave N. • This area is not identified on the Comprehensive Water plan. • Per the City of Renton Fire Marshall, this project has a fireflow of 2,000 GPM. • Fireflows that exceed 2500 GPM require a looped watermain system around the building. This is additional information for the applicant in case the buildings are revised such that the fireflow requirement increases. Renton Crown Apts. Green Folder;' April 10, 1996 Page 2 of 3 • All fire hydrants must be capable of delivering a min. of 1,000 GPM. • Watermains are to be located in the driving lanes. • System Development Fees (SDS) fees of $0.1 13 per square foot gross area but not less than $850 are required if they have not previously been paid. DRAINAGE: • Drainage system shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM. • A Level 1 Downstream analysis has been submitted and reviewed by the Plan Review Section. • Direct discharge will not be allowed due to lack of capacity of the downstream system. Detention is required. • If there is 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious area subject to vehicular use, a Biofiltration Swale is required. • This site is required to provide water quality treatment. This may be a wetvault or a wetpond. This should be a SEPA condition, since it is not directly stated in the code for this situation. • A site visit was made. The pipe in S 121st is a 24" and was running full at the time of the site visit. • The Surface Water System Development Charge of $0.129 per square foot of new impervious area but not less than $385 applies to the proposed project. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: • A variance from the Board of Public Works is required for a driveway approach in • excess of 8%. • Curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and street lighting are required to meet City standards. If the existing curbs, gutter, sidewalks and street lighting meet the City standards. then no improvements are required. GENERAL • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer in accordance with City of Renton Drafting Standards. • Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvement is 5% of the first $100,000, of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000, but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder Renton Crown Apts. Green Folder April 10, 1996 Page 3 of 3 when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: April 29, 1996 TO: Mark Pywell, Senior Planner FROM: Gail Reed, Airport Manager SUBJECT: Proposed Renton Crown Apartments Rainier Avenue and South 119th Street Reference is made to the Staff Recommendation to the Environmental Review Committee of a Finding of Non-Significance-Mitigated, on April 23, 1996. The apartment complex is proposed to be constructed on the west side of Rainier Avenue, just west of the Renton Airport. Topographical maps show that the land between Stevens Avenue and Rainier Avenue is steep, sloping terrain,with an altitude above sea level near 125 feet (125 ASL). The apartment complex will be located beneath the Airport Horizontal Surface. This surface is at an elevation of 179 feet above sea level (179 ASL). The apartment complex structures, light poles and trees cannot extend above or penetrate the 179' ASL surface. In addition, there could be an additional height restriction based on a 7:1 slope from the Airport. I could not locate the proposed complex using the map on the staff report, and so was unable to determine if the 7:1 slope restriction would affect the complex. Aircraft sometimes overfly Rainier Avenue at a low altitude. The location of the apartment complex would be almost directly beneath the route taken by the aircraft. The allowance of a high density residential area immediately adjacent to the airport is considered a non- compatible use. To preclude noise and aircraft overflight complaints from future residents, an Avigation Easement is absolutely necessary. Because of the apartment complex location and the potential for trees or man-made objects to extend above the complex into the Horizontal Surface, and the potential for complaints from the residents of the airport complex concerning aircraft noise from the airport, it is requested that an additional mitigation item be the granting of an Avigation Easement to the City of Renton. This easement will permit the operation of low flying aircraft over the subject property, the operation of aircraft on the airport, and will prevent the complex owners from permitting trees or other objects to extend into the Horizontal Surface, shine lights into the air in such a manner as to affect pilots, etc. PROPERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEW #96- (%/3 ,,19 •DEVELOPMENT APPLIC_. ON REVIEW SHEET ❑ PL', REVIEW ROUTING SLIP . ` 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S 'ET ❑ -` OTHER APPLICANT: Rfif/L E CAJ.¢77,tl(,KC ✓12a. ( b4v<<-,-),. RECEIVED FROM / IP/ raJOB ADDRESS: c0/ iedvi)//=,_ A -f1- /4 WO# ( NATURE OF WORK: (I! ry J ('a;,u,A) //91e7mC,&17 I Uri if-c GREEN# ❑ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION If SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED ❑ SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 VICINITY MAP O NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES ❑ FRONT FOOTAGE 0 OTHER ❑ VESTED ❑ NOT VESTED - ❑ This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review# dated /❑ PARENT PID#(subject to change)_ SUBJECT PROPERTY PID# f/ROd 4- �7O 7 A 9/•6/3 ff,36 3&Sr 0 King Co.Tax Acct#(new) 34 GS-39'737 9/0 o It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the eveloper/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit _ application. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE ' Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WATER . Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER ' ^U-'� I Special Assessment District/WATER a - _-------- Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER /c— ,1 Joint Use Agreement(METRO)' Local Improvement District - Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION' V FUTURE OBLIGATIONS I I • - ' SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER . #OF UNITS/ . SDC FEE . • ❑ Pd Prev. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) El Never Pd SQ.FTG. Single family residential$850/unit x • . Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park V Apartment, Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x - ./o& s' S'y 060 :00 Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq.ft.of property(not less than$850.00)X V ' . Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter R,aoo GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER . • ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) ® Never Pd • Single family residential dwelling unit$585/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x Apartment, Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x ice- a- 3'7J 1 C'(. .c•' C' Commercial/Industrial, $0.078/sq.ft.of property(not less than$585.00)x REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New-Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) Ead Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x All other properties$0.129/sq ft of new impervious area of property x(not less t 385.00) 78 S_2 �2 7G�s. �l _J PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ l C 3 Qo2 `/. �� ayr /2--S' 7 7/ 7 Sig lure of Reviewing Authority DATE B a *If subject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. ►1 ' **The square footage figures used are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only. 0 c:/template/fecapp/tgb EFFECTIVE July 16,1995/Ord.Nos.4506,4507,4508,4525,and 4526 . • V... tD 0 7 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: mks COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 11, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-038,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 27, 1996 APPLICANT: LEITZKE ARCHITECTS(STEVE LEITZKE1 PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS WORK ORDER NO: 78075 LOCATION: RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH &SOUTH 119TH STREET SITE AREA: 7.57 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 98,952 SQ.FT. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks approval to construct a 106 unit apartment complex on a 7.57 acre site. The project includes seven buildings containing 10 to 20 dwelling units each and a recreation building. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth - Housing Air --- Aesthetics Water --- LIghVGlare Plants -- Recreation _ Land/Shoreline Use -- Utilities Animals --- Transportation Environmental Health --- Public Services Energy/ _-- Preservation Historic/Cultural Natural Resources cit11.'v�/T? 1 72)j /) - a4l4- B. POLICY-RELATED COMME TS D 4 mac got- "zeta, _ _ _ _ nil,ce ) - 1-- ., ,�°aeo � ' %7a f2v)14:- .,., (//=-;Zuzdet./..c.e....?„42-ere../ ig . �O ri C7,vf� i'vr.��o 40A-/ X 3 s4• .l • 4. fix. •=="c_.- i 1 i f. ewe/ do ,� rru io1 .�i G/r-r C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS try7 cu1 oc vim" -77-10e-W-V2C,), A46._._ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identi d areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,c-. 4.ret-- \1T-t- b-/-4 Signature of Director r Authorized Represen ive D to DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 e City or icenton Department of Planning/Building/PuNn Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET t REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ee:Ikl(„8 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 11, 1996 ' APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-03.8,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 27, 1996 APPLICANT: LEITZKE ARCHITECTS(STEVE LEITZKE) PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS WORK ORDER NO: 78075 LOCATION: RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH &SOUTH 119TH STREET SITE AREA: 7.57 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 98,952 SQ.FT. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks approval to construct a 106 unit apartment complex on a 7.57 acre site. The project includes seven buildings containing 10 to 20 dwelling units each and a recreation building. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth - Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation qf. sa Qlol;tce calls -Fe,ir Soace. e31'1 mcafol curlakka,i1T ° l e- O f2 r(C of has 9,ru foxed e)lc.-e Lent secu,. I C,ri'rY Z frOk 3n ser v i as in -tft IS e . , oAd- cliltith. W 4 t\ insure, (.- loi y I:mea af\ re-c)JL01 r c 44u._. num►aer of es-I:m& l potkce.. Calls . .Th,k, (tea- .fin (oc�-t t\e .4 )er i�enccs veh't&-- r- tccl cr►mes Such as Auto c +f -Prom veh'1 cI S • Th1)6 eonkfltc u5 a I ei lOt W en g entn Gcn-he r• d- 4 %. P,U.in L0 C?Cach ah.ta of Sat Sattiel Seca-Flk • '2e 10 has, a it* Ch au#v Liktift ot.lOng &Guru f1 chit I73:uPck. feu) of our Vibuil of 1 cles ay C✓caw erect i;n *t Scu rct ?ar'lc / tZaruun CL AJ•i0A . In a rti-Ron 5ecLueltN d oa(e y list-ed by vim. C p lRca►�+ , - re coimr' act an e12.C.ironic gai-ed errh +0 4h.c. rev dtt1 • , 'cu tknun - C nLp Ltx s Lkhal- have_ clue, suff,er m mini nta 1 fo no Gr in.t. . i.b wow • I _ Tean` A- -I) - res'ti d.2r and, LouLlci. loc.- C Selling pot`n+- iv AL rr of Mtnt n+ . 1+ l uolLA also itx ef;k.s\I 4io ins &i t aS 4411N is only ont> V J'A CJLL a.Cctss ?cm+ 4,144 pcioe1'tLj . 1 gplt cad` a LukasLukas to tie,., a of � consfruc-hon �- fts also Lukas go in n 9 o n I. ,,n-to n • Cons YU,e i on m f ev1 a l S 4- -fools rn .d. +0 Ix 5ecurat. whcn no+- i.n (A , cuntA LAu_ 5itiz no oc s to lie- w l- 1-1-E- ag (leveto9 aunt- to ilttp (.►scour'a-C- Aeff nn I.. ✓arIckc.ti nt, . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /at( Signa ure o Director• Auth rued Representative Date 3—C?Srl% DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 • NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Approval (SA) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted ,with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS/LUA-96-038,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Leitzke Architects, seeks approval to construct a 106 unit - apartment complex on a 7:57 acre site. The project includes seven buildings containing 10 to 20 dwelling units each and a recreation building. GENERAL LOCATION: Rainier Avenue South &South 119th'Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: -Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit • The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval: For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. ,Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. .•,.,.1. .•. ,.I=f.6.14,'J]oI I• . IK ' 71 8.6 1,,il•I.1.i;N lw. •,1 _ , -S • //7TH. ST 2 ' - a...,s' a Q+�I, :i `+ Q p� f11 P liTaLl I . f!,. �,, r,•j3v��'I.- 3' .ii xi__,ti c"(I--• }°.'i�7, ,e:.;q,di. -o, ' -n,, -nal 5 6 14J3 9 10i. R 13_44 3 45 6N 10 II 121314 IS .!A a -1- ••-1• 2' 2 1 ° ' W e 3•y,_1 r 11 ',; -26'7A123T IBJ71•15 36 j134�3-33 0y2�928211''2�62524 121 u3' 64.9 ,I. .16i 3 _ 6• 1'l' • V1 i '' Ia :1 id "3A `E'"3. i-,I 4 0,D Yt o r J G,': - ,c 8« a. a'§ •0 I1 7 ' • i' 1,1', S.< : //7TH 'Rti=61 N17. 4o::LL.+ . e Sikh '�^M, c .,, 0is i ■ ■ t3�1 5 ." -w?It ■'1 sa, ? ...ma. O I G E. '1 ' . - 3 5 6 1j 9 II • 15 .443 y, 02. ,'1 2 2019 13.l 1.C�4 �� h R d �,�El 3P 713 )S' •,72111' 292821 • Z6j 24 i2�11`'+ 6 �• 9 0,'�'I 3�15161' III,!ON. O IA s r //BAH Sr e :: . m v cArED -1 Ya ;v� ,J1�'I I '�co,� .r�3p 6 � 'r��lP)° 7s t?J*rr�To.T__ y eY` '^1 _ 9 .FL f3 I Y' r`5 o"I I� 2I I•,. 4 "sm'S� . Ir Who I'rl I .2 1T, l U I,' • .4 II, A I,2 3 A 5,6 7.1' IOe11 2r 114WW1 ';5 it s°� : i24�V 2120I1918 11i ,114,16117'.3, , 5y ' =1`I,, �4J6 9 µ` yf Id 23 -1 ..mile❑ .4,38313 53431,:.31 781Ij;2622: 21 yg3,�4 L171�d11 9;II..-2 13!a 161 I7 1_2111.1019 •�.-- i�a. F+ i R�i' r o 313.rt 3 Q _ .II 1 0. .1 1. of y11 cl, ,120116 e. Z j�1i l 73 S //•T� . ., . ST , y' • My 13G3Te$ ';+ i; -�. q w t�7 f'p 7 ,i ,o�r- !r�'.�1 1 c:-^s]T,•�,� N t�z _� � r�a7- Q ,' j • III I II ■ N ''flb�, a �f'~ 1 z ' +t 11^ .0 4 8'i•I10111 013 1415 Wig '''2423�2121191817i •46.01819:2:2;3Y m I , II1 f ZS(�,• 2?t 201 {� yy ZI 6ti '9 I° i'.7�3 4IS I61 '1IS;41312111'9 p, +�, 111-8 I_ :'e e� �� d, a'i.4a�'ti,L e�. • q�_ _I•J•L s_1.a7.4p L._illy,* 11 11� � I • /20TH ' ST a G-- ° VA _O_ _ ,_ _ _ _ _ VACATE_ _ 11113 q __ II Y '. M•I ® •i,o.�,,. .f1^� I i„ ov.Lot 7 0.2r2A;;I RUDY J 51ARK0VICH A. 114 •11 ■�;. Ii I1C 3 '::❑4'I,,I�yy��...fj� {�`'� IIF3 .Jol �55 Acre 1.12 Ac r,2 ,IA 4 5 6.1 8 9I10 11 12113 14 I 13ti,415,6;14.8;9.1il.i,_kliCA `18 'Ic4° x..r,sa -- =61 „ •I' 'I'1 a"t' -DD1=_ .�7 ----RUDY J.S1ARK0VICH 1.60AG I, •� �1,0 25 4l!13.c I 19181gq7 1615 ]8!31o,3G'Syi4 31�13-2,eq' 1-�9:Z��8yt121'12625tA ly=1 �6� tl� .�yi�rtil tC% Y ,f.v+ '.*j'.�•1•I.�` 3 �S.i6o �aJ t:<.J l`1C.' L I • �B S • '/2/ST :ST.. ).4 R3. ri4 F5 i:6 f7-1!e..6r1k YG.2.•I,� 1c,' cP. +,, • ' 4 S,I,6 I 910 11'12.113!14 1 12 13.1;315,16 I :.1 •3 I IB T_S@s1-1: 1- 1--'---,•;;03-.J�-L{'-T„e,,- , _ - 1 ="11 Tt;t YL� xS I2IST SIT `` J. 322 11 S 17363S17A 3231 tBRI 5 � a_ • . r'I rn ' •`'P j l 11 J,I_1J �.I.I-�!(., - �?z , �.�,.. ,Pale er; .. ... i,f° 14� l: T.1 GENMALOT.DOC • W 1 . . ,„., :•,•• •: - ,;:::;•• ",:?,3*•'.=''' ''',;,.'';::',.'-';?'•,::.i `, • :••• •j ::. : • • ' .• '1"":'Tl."':::! ', ' ','"': :' :'-',' ' ' •„, :. "i';-, ,:i -, ' ,•:1 ,,,,‘ f.„;' „•• ,; ,, ' , ',,, . , 0 • 7 , .. 11 .1 11111 1 11 I 11111111 1 )1/ 1! I 1 1 1 1111 1111' 1 i ), it '7‘Iiili I :I I :Mil!: i in il I : I 1111.1 I :1! I --,, II .. •i , 1 1 . I , , I - - 1' 1' --- i 1 - -- :• ! PITY OF REA91-01,1 4. Dov:,:;:pmoi-it Soivicos Uvision 154076 i 8 MET Fi W A 200 Mill Avonuo South Renton, Washington 93055 1 • osotio , Robert 3' Ma‘cla 11902 VIA 98178-4033 r , - seattle , _________,1,:=. [:, i•‘c.\- \ -7- i IP:;.:1‘.•'''.:.: . I i q .--,,- •• L\i I 77. .., . '. Ihliiiiiiiiiiiillillliallii!IMk, I! 1 I si ; ill Hsi!I I I II II Ilkl -,riai-76-4073:21. ../7 1 . -: • , . , , ' ' , '. _1_ , NOTICE OF PROPOSED SIT:E APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON . A Site Approval (SA) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted_with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and'the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS/LUA-96-038,S'A,ECF . DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Leitzke Architects, seeks approval to construct a 106 unit apartment complex on a 7.57 acre site. The project includes seven buildings containing 10 to 20 dwelling units each and , a recreation building. • GENERAL LOCATION: Rainier Avenue South &South 119th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. .. • H, 1-I8cai,°r:1:I.I.�F-\ `'.-_ , , I"-S //7TH . . � JJ ��' TT ST' a ' Y a ra.".M,r— w a �\- ' '1, 0' .1r 1 '7Ep$i1 re s; J ��!i§e 4t I i ,, 1'�`1 "NW .I ich .EJ�� ,,El;„,',-1./" ,i - � .1 .. at3. 5 6 1 • 9 IO II 12 13 4 12 3 4 5 6- N0 II 12413 14 6 IB'� • I a 1 W 'g.7,, ' 2512412) Zr10 �y 33 37 36 �34 33 0 29 20 T1 26 25 24 6i a9I,1.I2 U 14 15 I6 i "^��-� i t--' .•�•� - p Ell' jA I link .- In�, , iY • ` iriNB O. n-I81'• it N S-G • l/7THtl'eF�1 b N`�IAIPL. e �.�ltilbl. M. 6 .,,-.4 E ''• ;'1 VI ao ._ E . o• 616 x. II T' &... ' Z u 1111 11 'i' _ , �! I ..' , c Nam:;. o_ I „ -� �� - 1 . 11, I�3 • 5 6 7 8.ar 11 M '= y/ 2019,4:7, I1 it _ -O 1 • h �fSk1 tly,E 3e 31 A •'12.1:°'192R121 261204 12°II• ?,.,. 6 19,f0'1i 12• 4 15 161 III,10,-,,•fnr, . ', 0 • • S //BTH ST e . . •- := ea 1 7.------- cts 23 3i a;�l�;' .fir --'• YACATEO �• �1 os ,r..1r 5�N'7�, �u. Ji�Q,1 i gj(-1'• I if.. 1,6 2 H``.S111':i. - 1 IT.•383i a �. ,_ D ,7. i 4.7 F7,.,;„ , � '.234 5N6 1„., �q,11 j� ;�� '•24�V.2120119`�'1811 15316I17�3 i`, ` m t7'a i'' . •'i''33(■�y 1 `M ,38373 53431,3231 2821,26254 � , EMI,91 1'R,314T15,6i `13?')'1110'9. y ;..--i'�'' " 73 s I/s'E1 �•. n Q e O �1= .�.I$r22' 11.1_,J.,.„i. 3 'ter . Z ,' 11yin. F+J. •P. 1.1,I-'. n° 3i, Q � 1n`. My �C47E4I' 11V90 U IIk7 II �j7�1pl�� a1.7 11Ig,••L3 •• -^ p,,'r pl..1N j } '\ '_fas I',, 11 3 .41111E 2 �CY2�( CSC-8'110111 -}18-LJ- ' 1 29�{.:1.019I.8 171 .461I7 18 19 1012..,47 -il \III', 111.i 25I�I .2;°ZO�I,I 31 3?•j.B 2'1126 '�i.,• 721 6 9 1°(11'2 ri A 15I116' j115;4I1312;1f'1 9 - '', 11 73 �. l Uhl.. 4) u'n u 11 . I t ' (4 . I,I•I .�_1�� 0' •J_.i•1_ V i, 'lm -' d J Itg o'tegy •23,s k a ,�_j,3j.. _ L !U _i. 3, S, ,I IIA • , S. /2OTH • ST U __ YI,,0_ _ __ - _ YI CATS_ ,. -I, '‘IC-1 113 . `.. �y2 J,•--',.�."'. •' I.� a°h 6.W.T.OT7 012.. RUDY J S:ARKOVILH I� ' C■.11 I it AIM! di. I Ll',`. ' '; . 'W-', 5 kre. n I UL Ac • „Y 11 ��IIIIL'. ' \9 • 4 5 -'7 B 9110 II 1211314 -�3 415'46,7 8,0,E II1'IJL.,1 i- h& -ntc +_. __fir --.__._-_._ %�j `I• 4�n• 4' i•'�2�0 fl RUDY J.57ARKOVICH f I.BDAL. II , ',o 25 4 3 211 18 fl 1615 38!31a5'A 33i3231 .98121�2625;7A }21• yµ; ly"°lo " ,,I1. . S /2/ST ST a .x P,53 F4 5 1 6 E.11-R4c L ' 1r,-. ,III 91 1 N"1Ei;QI'31` Fu n u 1sidr roan ie4ER!� x =thI' o: 12 `1' 4I5�6.i18-9 0'1112�3 14 I'2°3 jd•ISl6 Olt ICI j?_ _13�1_L'vL_L__i—L_1 _J�_}A__L?d_` ., . •'�, I19�.8 • t,3713635 32 31 T 26R1 (�, -_ ° 7. , a 3°1 t°r.232E LL{.1I I7.�1 1 1. , I r. G-21 v -1 y I p.iI " 1y 11. .1 LI I,.f. •'�Z� I'�:�Y,4O !R��pC'9 "��ria�'r?1or�i.�"lIg i. ,l r-,7 ,.,. GENMALOT.DOC • • 1 11 1111111II 1111i 11 1 1 11111 1 }1 tl 111 4 } ' 4 t77,di}} t }11'3.t 1}}} }} 1 } }}! fry OF R TO �._. -{ ,,: Services Division ;`1 a • 200 �Siil Avenue South MAR 2 8'9 6 '�deh .k� a..r� Renton, Washington 98055 METER d'- -. 7154076 U.S..POSTAGE Kranz Mathewson 2271 Rainier Ave N Renton , WA 98055 _ �. 1 _ NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Approval (SA) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS/LUA-96-038,,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Leitzke Architects,. seeks approval to construct a . 106 unit - 1partment complex on a 7.57 acre site. The project includes seven buildings containing 10 to 20 dwelling units each and i recreation building. - GENERAL LOCATION: Rainier Avenue South &South 119th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval • Building Permit ---The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when;calling for proper file identification. .. ,,. .i:7.,I,R,f.4 IL' -1 L8 .�I':.'1:1-'I'a111 r� ']1`u '-I- '1 ., , : ' 1 . '''' //Mti':- ' - - -'ST_, 9r _•e _.....-_-_ lamotw,•`yam'_ _'..'"\: .'1 •1•', O I J, �� gr, - - oe z - 7 - - y .1I 5 6.7• 0111�.U.A4 1 2 3 5 5. roll 12,0 N Is SEE „u A' •• 1 o — '.�; ,i. Its in• 70 re i .:a' n 34+33 30292611 232A "4�2:4, 2' F yt '61 ,1 9i�illt 1 \, 71 II 1i I] p'ni 1is "C- IY3�1�. :i '` .p le z il, S.F-- l/7TH "RESI 17� • ill. x sl 46L F }iM. C,or° 1 -- � 6 0 •1� •Pa N, � �''�c � � Il r ,�' O � 1 1 • z ❑11A1 W.air b Ig rL•1rS� '�ktr, i �: :;,►yr w- 5�67�.��fb u`d I„A3 '667 9_11 +ems tl �s„ ��t!t• ��:A '', �,:11 Att.n* •0- Ic -.4 f.r.. via ]e. li$:. r•.29 - zSj 2] ,. 7' ,,., io7'il•. aIS161� 'li,p4•L17 '� O e I.,,l i y) ay. i s t31 fg9Sl ATI1. ,22 (n C gg � q, �Ej, �Ti�� Z _ .aa.• 2] x SL�rIr= lj_ �: ,�F' vtur6o ,'ink "—s art a A S 7 1 It' _ 1: , ii¢ , I .4 y zl 20 N IR I.I 2��za; '91 i.O l7 N 5 161 r• : ' I-',2�„+.-,l Q /�Il, i_i.�. . �. z_1 T S I h,. ,, .g,,_ 3 ' :„,- r N5 6' 9110 ,3 iC 'roo Y213 is 7�, � 2 P.21:019..t''8,J K J.r18 19.r2.;.1 rn 1'VI, II i* i 2524 232 203 107.614 i2f1 ,g, p, • .. 5'''910'21:InN 61161 1115.Pdi1312!I I.',9.Si,!• � `;,. �1v .��'. ':'I::°h' �"n 1k i m A i1.� - ,.,r., :In 9 I I V ', 1Im -1 a.1 cb h d 'd re F k �_a,vl.'I.I.L �_1?+r w Cz�l�_L�_I_i. 1,__ „� ' /20TH ST a VA `=°- - - -- — -'"cam_ - II „3 rt� ,,,, Goa LOT 7,OZZ AL RUDY J STARROVILR, 'II 1-7 Val'0 I balira] �� 14"-�,'I,I � 'r-.. 3�9qp5!�A[r25i . n I ,.I2 AC .,: !iIIlly 111A. ,4 B I112:13 4 I 3;,,415,;,6,�:'8 4VI��L� .n. �. w_.��S�i .L:_ �ai�___r 21▪ -r7:�� a ill '1' N - ``__RUDY•J.6TARROVICN 1.60 UC . ',1,10 I ;_2q5 ( 18 12.1164 J�6{,7J'3.6;35 33d,-31 09,022•1;2A•,f' la, - 2J1 I `,'I 11�1 !tT1V PP29.1'T 1.92 * -YO " . }'..._.,.. .:a - . __r....,-_ �,,.r'f S /2/ST .. _1-- . ::1. .r'STa ,DI.;-„R3-..;,s ;5,;:6 M YR.c I;. z -1, ,,�1 A15�6 �?� II I12y3 11213�A ISw6I •I IC': • I^ 1'7.__ �1L.°-I..1.� 1_—L �-L__1-• 1— E I •� ' �11 ?_ �3 22 I I7 5 17.135 3534133132131 1261n s I „0 ..,1{p�1 L' '. GENMALOT.DOC . it .; 'i' . . - r ._ 't j v. e.. t _ ., Arr,w ,..°` •.°':- .fir• . 'a.: i, rJv' » 4:. r;, ;.1'4 ,'C , 4 ;'> • 1: . ,,;s :• a;°, ,l I I 4' Ii - - -' -------- - - --- --- - 1 1 111 11 it 11 1 111111 11111 11 ill 111 11111 1 11' 1 1 Cti . 11 11 11 i1 ! 111111 iiis! 11 Fi: 11! 11111 i 1, I . • ; I, I III i 77. f ' IL P E.N T O ti sx'fe S �'�`ay 4r,_",'s.�ar----- -iit *, r7�j 6 F r1 r-ray�j E,l 6 F r * Day: ; ..� . . ::1 i Cv,'J �� J ...3. �AR 2 8'9 G Q? �w ��i .�D o - 4,, 200 M:I 11Uliiiliv Soni Renton, Washington 98055 w A PB METER 41 c 154076 U.S..POSTAGE ' Eduardo Valentin 14895 Interurban Ave S #46 ' Tukwila , II,J J 9Q1--L_9,— { r�_, •.T ----r^ ai I r, : VA'LEy89 4,,, a9@16+53068�.1,3'95':03/;� �,'46-,, : I /_: vq��' tARD TIME 4E'X'F � Ft-PIN :TO' "SEND i'1•_ __...__.____ .._.___ ._..... ,_.__. 4 —1 kliVa'yEDU` 4R1 -' / \ 116=1Y6 '6'7k7F•It`a`'P 'E '5 - i I\ /4. ;p 6eATTILE-- WH 9,5,17,f5-4O;Oh• ` I Iy `-ICI ` r:;; 1I V i`i '' t' s } �4 `Ir ((i i i il(iitli1(1! i !Ft i i t I((ii ii�(t . (( i; • 1:1 3 111 . il7:' • . ilh NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Approval (SA) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS/LUA-96-038,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Leitzke Architects, seeks approval to construct a 106 unit apartment complex on a 7.57 acre site. The project includes seven buildings containing 10 to 20 dwelling units each and a recreation building. , GENERAL LOCATION: Rainier Avenue South & South 119th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hail. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. FF 5 �-I:� v 7 I I-Y Is 1`fin Pro,7 i 8,II.:c,.c-I.I-I.n I`"1 _ •c 1`k. - q _S w //7TH ' ST a n a rco<oM, :, v O I. r<.. 3c->• I" �� T. .b yam, ai •,.r.^ as 1 ,� � ,1 11 6:1 4 L�f" 1_? 41, r gw s,1■a ta, ■xti34� 90', ,, 'fit �'S 6'MOW rt'15 4 i 3 4 5 IO I12 fl I4 6 =AV =1 -t :,_2 I ' , _,Q,_J _a,�1' - 25'24I23 •!9;8'171• 4E2-33' 4i1,1262526 ,1 y} 9 r'L 213 !bi "'6• ' I\ ''' i, ' —r1. Iz7 n 5 2z ' 7t to �e 11 < n 7 a 3.I. . �:- ,icra3 . . .� 23 „; 4.0 6' �!.IFal' :-2-s3,,.1�` , 1 rnS.F- l/7TH '� Ib N`tlt�1,'L. o �Il•lul. ^ 1• c J, 1°' �� 'I • tii atttyy�,, 3�� l�■17I 1� r. IIGi�E_ �1 b4� ■ "� i1 b!1:11 I�: Fj Ia . 1.359 5:i 11 r(i.* IS 15 :1� mt :2I, u,it4 _.. .O- ,1 75 :2 .1, 16 3�.. a 2124 ] � 7ur�56"'9 , 112' W 1516i V III,10.'., � O, , , • _ Ea Ind ■iii Fii o If11mlH • • Q. I:,. • J •L: • cn1:, \ '', L• S //BTH ST ,2 "o ------- 1;v, ?r a• _ vAcArEO -i �(�j v,,, x. n.io"'4, Jo ,6 r•p wag, r . r•77' (Fr,r1.13F- I e, ' ■l 3. sln 31 t3e C4'i I Il �d'k 'ark , J�i'�i•�T' 'I, q ,41 i I•az , In t,, il' 45 7 f,I II1.c C3 I,234 S67 910 II'Rr31145 I9-Nz;2� � �74 is 21 20 19 18 111 ..1K i15116 i17 ti 9y •;, ,II 23 I NIA rr 161�;33373 S34311323r 9 i 2L2612e 1 __zi rJ`i; m}� 9II ! R I3,kt1f5!6: 1113 11.19."99, r �1.n..I p� , �!�I�li rtlr � p,Q� c� 1 •A; I ��..Q I�`4 19 I""• ',13 rzL.F Q ._ .Pfki,ni.I_.1 , 11c'f al_L• yx �e Z it�I�i i 73 S //,T,J1 • ST ''i. ish% $SMc!s 911 ;I ,�. ii q. I . •.0 iohtt• 0;Mai,9�-�-i�ar,•rx; �A 1 c•-.111'„S,inr ihi i-7T1V�1" 2�a?1- 1 ,i_ 41617 :'9 I10:M1. 314 4 4-5 7„64�10111 1213�1415 . owe: Z4 23_ 2120!?r,8 17� •1161I7 1819.7.A.3r m 11,1 llE O �, �E .LJ d'i, �.. 74 r1 I 73 25(�,•®.2?I�201 38�]73635 W,1j,2 30�:927h6, rp 't 549{. I 213 W15.I61' 'IISr!61312II I•9.6: 0111, Illy • :.r �,, : .- v] . .1. . �4. fE . -'ill i. . ,_L-lv_ .'•1J-11 x El v 1I'1 Om "'� /20TH _—k L VA; _ ._. _ _ YeCArF_ 11 ' Iim , S. ,.o.,. I.;.,.�.,. I..-U� T GOV I. 171O rt Acr RUDY J S'ARKOVICH 'll 1riR, ' g --VA I.IL Pc st 2 A • r��• rtY1 IJ�: 4 5„6PI 8 9 • I10.1'I!2113141tco3 I n�i 7,a.?`....ii. tiJc4`a _' T": s-1'� =6J- '11 . '!' � RUOY J.STARKOVICH I.DOAD „ '�'1�0 A. 423 2 I' BIIBIf7 1515 ?6;37y5 • 3t3231. Ij9_Z82126'2574 S /2/ST- h�: R3 la4 -5 I{:6 �I 18 .c 11 ,,`` ST g __ t�;nI. �SFje'T1}�l{ t '' " ,11 .I.■: ��r, '',•:,. . . • 161 d r`r—_ ,WriLeti 1 t!"fl!,, ti A 111.7�]�" I2 t z '1 :� i _I-,1_ L—��—EEEIII�-__x_m_-_--7p- ue , 1 5 6 1 -9j0;lI II2!j314 12 3 6'5 6' w .1 .3 _ cn o Fdr oar 11 -N d I I I J•I a{ �. 2; i � s i2/sr ' r.2322 '9+, Il j�15 313635 3231 j28121 5 I j 20 •a; x .2yr Uol.a 1.1 •hI .' 1 V' ,a I.�. I 1 I. .I.I''''�' �.. Z 'let P'" i,PeN l;In flop. .1.0..il.t-. 4'i i, ,t r,1 `A., GENMALOT.DOC j • • I y n • • �J L._ •^ram ak:�W tv1 ' } ... t�i,:f:,iii, , iF 1 11 , F FF\ -I. II -sue •*.' _ �.u.a^s m \ ti.. .. -..__._„- ,.,..,•.�. -e.:......ter- �z�,:r• -r _ _ _ • 1, - I' i MAR 28'9G 04',9 4111 a 0 a3 2 - « Services Division "' 2i�3 Mill l�venue Scnth ,t METER 47 Rg;�tOfl, !(Uashingi®n 98055 �` 1 54076 t1.S..POST E ,x . Mehrdad & Elaine Shirazi 214 NW 2nd St Ren-ton ,- Wes- _..98.055-110f • ••;;.;:;i::::::?::i:::'r:i�;:;;;;:;�:::;':.i.is:i:.ii:Y:ii::ii:ti:i:Y.i:�:!tii:tiff:::ti:Si:k:<isi:<:;isJ::;::`:::Ciii:'i{w.,.:'..wa..:�:.::::yw�..�: '.:.:::`w.:`. ii}i::9:•i':is iiiii:?i iiii'vi:?iii:•i:ii:•ii}i}i}}i::vvM:::::'•i'::::••}:::{n.i'•:'•i::::{¢:::i}i::•:•:ii.:..V I.1•:�:�t!�i.�L��O ......... ``�� ?: .l'VI� �. �::i::::::':•::::::•:::::::::ism:v::::::::::::::::'i::::'ii}}:':f!::C::i'�:i:?'::ii::::::::::::•.:::}:�:;i '.:`i}iiiiiiiiii:?•iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii}i:[•:iii::4}iiii Ji::ii•iiii:.:}:C:•i:•?ii::;}:}i.:�:::::.�::::::::::::.: .:i'fiii::isis^i{:::•:•'}titi::':•ti:ii::::ti::::•:::::::•:•::::::':v:'i::iii::i::i::i::i::i:::i::::ii:::i::'::.;..:x::wr::..?'v::.;':::::.}:...:..:: ....I.C>�S..D.....S..QN.......................................................:..........:.....::..: s a sup : UNDI u n s qi'{•ii:{::::•i:.ii?ii:{::.i'iryii::.iii}ii:.i:•ii:{.}}ii:^i}:i4i::vi:4:Li:•:}iiiii:iii:.i:. ;.,y.y. .:Y.:.:< .. .. .: •.....:.:..:......................:.........:.....:.:..:::.�::•::•.�:.�::::::.:� PROJECT NAME: ---/j/0 A CQ)UJA) /9, [T) / APPLICATION NO: Ste - 03e, SPt , etr The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL • NUMBER REC yvED tiM 2 0 1996 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING • CITY OF REIVTON &`'ate 4 (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (Continued) NAME .-: ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER . . , . . ', . Applicant Certification I, MIWC-- a.- (4-Jkle) fi61 , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: D ' y of Renton Technical Services Records Title Company Records 1 D Kin County Assessors Records i/ 5) Signe Date (ApPlicAt 1 NOTARY ATTESTED: Subsc ibed and sworn before me, a Notw_Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at on the / /)-day of In'k c-i-c_A--.. , 197 C. • Signed • C) (")-(21-6--v . • ' , (Notary Public) 1 .i..•:::::E:::i:igini•n•;:ggni.N.::::::::M;::::::.P...Miiiinai.:::::: ::::::::::•gt;t::tit:Piiiiiitisiiiii3fge:iiiiiiiiiijieltit.trit.E:::0:i.:;:liiii::!::nii::::.:MigagNinili::i:i:iiiii:igiiii?..i,....ii:!iiiii.::ii*:.:::. OF..--'-'-'w•••••••••'••••'•'•:•:•:••••••••••:.:•:••••:•:.••••:•:•.....:...:•:.:,.........,:::::,:,...::::..................:.:.::::::::::::::::::::::::....:.:.;.:„.; CERTIFICATION:ViiiAlLiNG i i•:.:..5141ilijAditi::•.::::::•!::""•:•''''"••:::,..4i0ietiy.:.,: e.ttifvItlavnouce*.ptthe.:::iprpp-itlAp*ApplIpappmwpre...fn?!...g..*:,...City ,.......:::::::;.:::::.......„.. Employee). :44:46iiiiiiiiiialliii6:60.iii!!iiiiiiiii24.C53$!;I::::2464:;tr..f/s:::::::itEMEM:: ::•:.:''...EgMaii.-0:::i. ii:VE.ii'Vs:::::i.?:iiiimii...iiii.:iii:::iiimi-..isc..iii.:i.:i.::::::::::.ii*J:i:::?::::.:::i:i:::::x , .,... .:-. ,:.. SPY' Date..l::i.:.n::.t.. n... F!1?! *4:.:.2t::ii:::.;i::i:•::,':,'..*::i:i4:::::4:::i*:::...i..1:.*1*1;':1:•-Z-111;;.0;;;:::iis:i!ii'::i-..i:i;;iiTa:i::i::i::i:iii:iigii:iii;igii:i.:iig;i:.iiiiiii.:i::i:i::i;i0iM::i;i;sigiii.:i::i;::i!;i!i:i::i;!i:ii::I:iii:iiiiiiiii!i 1 •...sa-%' - .:CM:in':::::::•:::.i...: .: . ::. ::: :::. .:!::::::::::.:.:::.::::.7..:!_::::::::_:::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::.:!::::::::::::.:!:::.!:::::::::::.:::!:::::::'::::::::::::::!:!::.:!::::::.::::::::::.::::.: :::::.:!:!::::::::::::::::::.:!::::.::.::.::::!..s.::::::.:!::::.:!:!::::.::.:!:!::::::::.:!::::::::::::::::: --' 4-. .1:::::*:::!:"..''',:''''j:::..*::::..;.:.::::-::::::;,:::.::::::*•::i.i4;::::::::::::::::::::=•:;:.iig:::::::::::::.*.::::::::.ii:i:,...:*i:::::::::::;:1:::::;n:i•:::. .iii.:ii:dhotArtvigionmigig.:.:simgggim....-eiiiiiiiii::::.;:wi.:mi:iii.:ii:.:ii::.:.:iii.:ig...mir.: sdoidif'-e*ii4'.:.iiW&i.n:::,iiifeitiCaiiil'iii*Ntifoer.g.:00.1.0;!!!ii0:1004:i1.0(Pt§pMpIiNOPttl01Ang i _g:,Y..::;4i$bioyi.A::ii.il::IM:gt;,iiirt•.%A:ifiiWao44.kiiiciSt).,i::!wxjie;.a,mmp.gp:,!iq,1.Ii.#.4vi::;.::,::::::::::g:i..ilig.iiggii ...L .„:,.,,..„... ..:,„..,....;„„..„,„„„„.„„„„,.4f,„„„„.„„„„„„„,„...;„,.„,„„,,,:„,.„,,,.„,„„:„„„„„„„,„„„„„:„„„„„„,„„:„,..,„„„,"„,„,,,:,,„„,.„„„„„,„,,..:,:,,,i,„„,,„,„,„„,„,„„„„,.,„,„„,„„„„„„.„„„,„„.„„„„„,..„,,,..,,„„,„„:„„„„„„„„„„,„„„„,„,„„„„„„„,„,„„„„,:„„„„;:„.,„,„„„,:„.,„„„!„„„„i„„„, , .,..,,,...... listprop.doc REV 07/95 2 !' TRANS'I.r,.'ION TITLE INSURANCE COMPI .. Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 02/16/96 Prepared for:MARK LUNDBERG Parcel Number : 118000-3070-09 Q-S-T-R : NW-07-23-05 Owner/Taxpayer : KOHL EXCAVATING INC Mailing Address: 3330 E VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98055 Site Address WA 98178 Phone Number : CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 921-VAC-COML 0-1AC Zoning : SF Square Feet : Land Size : 19,500 Total Rooms : Units Bedrooms • Yr Built/Remodl: Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total : $5,000 1995 Tax • $70.29 Land Value $5,000 Tax Exemption: Imp Value • Tax Area; Code: 2124 %Improvement : Jurisdiction : RENTON SALE DATA Last Sale Date : 78/05/24 Type Loan Sale Price • $5, 000 Lender • . Type Deed • TDWWD Lender Name . Multi Parcel Loan Amount 1: Excise Tax # 0474886 Loan Amount 2: Auditor Fee # : 780524-0984 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: BRYN MAWR ADD Vol/Page: 005/058 , Legal : L 13-14-15-16 B 30 LOT 13-14-15-16 B 30 & POR ST ADJ • • Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1996 TRW-REDI Property Data TRANSLU 'ION TITLE INSURANCE COMP/Y._ Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 02/16/96 Prepared for:MARK LUNDBERG Parcel Number : 118000-3855-00 Q-S-T-R : NW-07-23-05 Owner/Taxpayer : KOHL EXCAVATING INC Mailing Address: 3330 E VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98055 Site Address WA 98178 Phone Number . CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 922-VAC-COML lAC-5AC Zoning : CA Square Feet : Land Size 2 . 64 Total Rooms : Units Bedrooms .• Yr Built/Remodl: Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total : $40, 000 1995 Tax $553 .57 Land Value $40, 000 Tax Exemption: Imp Value Tax Area Code: 2124 %Improvement Jurisdiction : RENTON SALE DATA Last Sale Date : 78/01/24 Type Loan .• Sale Price : $104, 000 Lender : Type Deed TDCEC Lender Name : Multi Parcel Y Loan Amount 1: Excise Tax # 0453173 Loan Amount 2 : Auditor Fee # : 780124-0333 PARCELS INCLUDED WITH LAST SALE Parcel Number UseCode Total Value %Land %Imp. Total Ac. 118000-3855 901 $16,200 0.0 0.0 0.000 118000-3965 903 $37,200 0.0 0. 0 0. 000 118000-3975 903 $75,500 0.0 0.0 0. 000 OTHER PARCELS 2 $88,600 0.000 5 $217,500 0. 000 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: BRYN MAWR ADD Vol/Page: 005/058 Legal : L POR LOT POR LOTS 9 THRU 20 BLK 35 TGW LOTS 12 THRU 24 BLK 40 & POR ALLEY & STS ADJ Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1996 TRW-REDI Property Data / TRANS.:- 2ION TITLE INSURANCE COMP- Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 02/16/96 Prepared for:MARK LUNDBERG Parcel Number : 118000-3915-08 Q-S-T-R : NW-07-23-05 Owner/Taxpayer : KOHL EXCAVATING INC PRF SH Mailing Address: 3330 E VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98055 Site Address WA 98178 Phone Number CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 921-VAC-COML 0-1AC Zoning : SF Square Feet Land Size : 16,400 Total Rooms Units : Bedrooms • Yr Built/Remodl: Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total : $5, 000 1995 Tax $70.29 Land Value $5, 000 Tax Exemption: Imp Value : Tax Area Code: 2124 %Improvement Jurisdiction : RENTON SALE DATA Last Sale Date : 87/01/27 Type Loan • Sale Price $4,500 Lender • Type Deed : WARRANTY Lender Name Multi Parcel : Loan Amount 1: Excise Tax # 0923703 Loan Amount 2 : Auditor Fee # : 870127-1053 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: BRYN MAWR ADD Vol/Page: 005/058 Legal : L 21 THRU 24 B 35 LOT 21 THRU 24 B 35 & POR ST & ALLEY ADJ Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1996 TRW-REDI Property Data / V l . TRANSL_ ION TITLE INSURANCE COMP_._ Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 02/16/96 Prepared for:MARK LUNDBERG Parcel Number : 118000-3935-04 Q-S-T-R : NW-07-23-05 Owner/Taxpayer : CHRISTIANSON I C Mailing Address: 3330 E VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98055 Site Address : 11805 RAINIER AV N WA 98178 Phone Number : CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 921-VAC-COML 0-1AC Zoning : CA Square Feet : Land Size : 26,195 Total Rooms : Units Bedrooms • . Yr Built/Remodl: Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total $117,900 1995 Tax $1,629.21 Land Value : $117,900 Tax Exemption: Imp Value Tax Area Code: 2124 %Improvement : Jurisdiction : RENTON SALE DATA Last Sale Date : 80/04/01 Type Loan : Sale Price : $115,000 Lender : Type Deed CONTRACT Lender Name : Multi Parcel Loan Amount 1: Excise Tax # : 0585930 Loan Amount 2: Auditor Fee # : 800401-0177 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: BRYN MAWR ADD Vol/Page: 005/058 Legal : L 1 THRU 6 B 36 LOT 1 THRU 6 B 36 & POR ST ADJ Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1996 TRW-REDI Property Data . TRANSI__ -ION TITLE INSURANCE COMPS-'._ Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 02/16/96 Prepared for:MARK LUNDBERG Parcel Number : 118000-3965-07 Q-S-T-R : NW-07-23-05 Owner/Taxpayer : KOHL EXCAVATING INC Mailing Address: 3330 E VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98055 Site Address : 11900 RAINIER AV N WA 98178 Phone Number : CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 921-VAC-COML 0-1AC Zoning : CA Square Feet . Land Size : 12,400 Total Rooms : Units Bedrooms .• Yr Built/Remodl: Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total $55,800 1995 Tax $771.73 Land Value $55,800 Tax Exemption: Imp Value Tax Area Code: 2124 %Improvement Jurisdiction : RENTON SALE DATA Last Sale Date : 78/01/24 Type Loan .• Sale Price $104,000 Lender .• Type Deed : TDCEC Lender Name Multi Parcel Y Loan Amount 1: Excise Tax # 0453173 Loan Amount 2: Auditor Fee # : 780124-0333 PARCELS INCLUDED WITH LAST SALE Parcel Number UseCode Total Value %Land %Imp. Total Ac. 118000-3855 901 $16,200 0.0 0.0 0. 000 118000-3965 903 $37,200 0.0 0. 0 0.000 118000-3975 903 $75,500 0. 0 0. 0 0.000 OTHER PARCELS 2 $88, 600 0.000 5 $217,500 0. 000 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: BRYN MAWR ADD Vol/Page: 005/058 Legal : L 7-8 B 36 LOT 7-8 B 36 & POR STS ADJ Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1996 TRW-REDI Property Data • TRANSI.r,±ION TITLE INSURANCE COMPA�... Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 02/16/96 Prepared for:MARK LUNDBERG Parcel Number : 118000-3975-05 Q-S-T-R : NW-07-23-05 Owner/Taxpayer : KOHL EXCAVATING INC Mailing Address: 3330 E VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98055 Site Address : 3000 119TH ST S WA 98178 Phone Number : CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 921-VAC-COML 0-1AC Zoning : CA Square Feet : Land Size : 42,900 Total Rooms : Units : Bedrooms . Yr Built/Remodl: Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total $128,700 1995 Tax $1,778. 33 Land Value $128,700 Tax Exemption: Imp Value Tax Area Code: 2124 %Improvement Jurisdiction : RENTON SALE DATA Last Sale Date : 78/01/24 Type Loan .• Sale Price $104,000 Lender .• Type Deed TDCEC Lender Name . Multi Parcel : Y Loan Amount 1: Excise Tax # 0453173 Loan Amount 2 : Auditor Fee # : 780124-0333 PARCELS INCLUDED WITH LAST SALE Parcel Number UseCode Total Value %Land %Imp. Total Ac. 118000-3855 901 $16,200 0.0 0.0 0.000 118000-3965 903 $37,200 0. 0 0. 0 0.000 118000-3975 903 $75,500 0. 0 0.0 0.000 OTHER PARCELS 2 $88, 600 0.000 5 $217,500 0. 000 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: BRYN MAWR ADD Vol/Page: 005/058 Legal : L 9 THRU 17 B 36 LOT 9 THRU 17 B 36 & POR ST ADJ Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1996 TRW-REDI Property Data TRANS1' _-ION TITLE INSURANCE COMPA.._ Page 1 TRW REDI PROPERTY PROFILE 02/16/96 Prepared for:MARK LUNDBERG Parcel Number : 118000-4100-01 Q-S-T-R : NW-07-23-05 Owner/Taxpayer : KOHL EXCAVATING INC Mailing Address: 3330 E VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98055 Site Address : 11900 RAINIER AV N WA 98178 Phone Number : CHARACTERISTIC DATA Use Code-Desc : 922-VAC-COML lAC-5AC Zoning : CA Square Feet : Land Size 2 .32 Total Rooms : Units Bedrooms .• Yr Built/Remodl: Bathrooms : F T H ASSESSMENT/TAX DATA Assessed Total : $455,400 1995 Tax : $6,289.40 Land Value .• $455,400 Tax Exemption: Imp Value Tax Area Code: 2124 %Improvement Jurisdiction : RENTON SALE DATA Last Sale Date : 78/01/24 Type Loan .• Sale Price $104,000 Lender • Type Deed TDCEC Lender Name . Multi Parcel Y Loan Amount 1: Excise Tax # 0453173 Loan Amount 2 : Auditor Fee # : 780124-0333 PARCELS INCLUDED WITH LAST SALE Parcel Number UseCode Total Value %Land %Imp. Total Ac. 118000-3855 901 $16,200 0.0 0. 0 0. 000 118000-3965 903 $37,200 0.0 0.0 0.000 118000-3975 903 $75,500 0.0 0. 0 0.000 OTHER PARCELS 2 $88,600 0.000 5 $217,500 0.000 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Plat Name: BRYN MAWR ADD Vol/Page: 005/058 Legal : L 1 THRU 21 B 39 LOT 1 THRU 21 B 39 & POR VAC ST Information provided is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed Copyright 1996 TRW-REDI Property Data • ■ TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PREPARED FOR: MARK LUNDBERG Date : 02/16/96 Time : 10:34:50 Report: Farm List Sort : Owner Name ********************* * SEARCH PARAMETERS * ********************* ********************************************************************* * ITEMS SELECTED INDEX USED * ********************************************************************* * * * [ 118000 4205 Parcel Number * * [ 118000 4230 * * [ 118000 3815 * * [ 118000 3850 * * [ 118000 3000 * * [ 118000 3120 * * 118000 2820 * * [ 118000 2645 * * [ 118000 2685 * * [ 118000 2515 * * [ 118000 2615 * * [ 420440 0005 * * [ 420440 0355 * * [ 426820 0005 * * [ 426820 0065 * * 072305 9063 * * 072305 9050 * * 072305 9047 * * 072305 9007 * * 072305 9003 * * 072305 9002 * ********************************************************************* REMEMBER TRANSNATION TITLE WHEN PLACING YOUR TITLE ORDERS • * 1 * MetroScan/King : •_ Owner:ABBOTT A F Parcel # :420440 0065 00 Site : 8925 S 121ST ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : Mail : 8925 S 121ST ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $109 , 800 YB: 1955 Q: SW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 3 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ /1 Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 340 Ac: . 27 Ph:206-772-2301 * 2 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:ABBOTT ALBERT Parcel # :420440 0066 09 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : Mail : 8925 S 121ST ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $300 YB: Q: SW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 3 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: . 05 Ph: 206-772-2301 * 3 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:ARNONE ALFRED Parcel # :420440 0020 04 Site : 12110 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : Mail : 12110 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $95, 600 YB: 1942 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 1 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm:2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 880 Ac: . 20 Ph:206-772-4379 * 4 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:BANEL ROBERT J & MELANIE S Parcel # : 118000 2645 07 Site : 11718 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 05/23/90 Mail : 11718 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $140, 000 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $133,500 YB: 1930 Q:NW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 25 LOT 5-6-7-8 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF:2, 050 Ac: .27 Ph: * 5 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:BARRON BRENT Parcel # : 420440 0215 09 Site : 321 RAINIER AVE N RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 07/27/89 Mail : 310 HARDIE AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use :532 IND, SERVICE BLDG,2K TO 10K SQFT Asd.V: $163,200 YB: 1953 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 48 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 2, 000 Ac: . 33 Ph: * 6 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:BECHTOLD EDWARD J & BABETTE Z Parcel # :420440 0055 02 Site : 8908 S 122ND ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 02/22/89 Mail : 8908 S 122ND ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $62, 170 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $80, 500 YB: 1971 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 3 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT E Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 950 Ac: . 17 Ph: 206-772-2015 * 7 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:BEKCMAN VIRGIL H & CLAUDIA K Parcel # : 420440 0210 04 Site : 333 RAINIER AVE N RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 06/15/88 Mail : 17404 SE 140TH ST RENTON WA 98059 Sale Price: $310, 000 Use :261 OFF, 1-3 STORY,LESS THAN 5K SQFT Asd.V: $347, 300 YB: 1982 Q:NW S : 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 48 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : 1 BldgSF:4, 176 Ac: . 37 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • * 8 * MetroScan/King : Owner:BENDER V J Parcel # :420440 0281 08 Site : 260 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail :260 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $95, 900 YB: 1951 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 54 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm:4 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF:2, 100 Ac: . 17 Ph:206-271-0696 * 9 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:BIRD G ROBERT Parcel # : 426820 0025 06 Site : 8722 S 121ST ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : Mail : 8722 S 121ST ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $108,400 YB: 1941 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 4 LENZ-FARMETTE TRS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF:2, 180 Ac: .21 Ph:206-772-2099 * 10 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:BLUMENTHAL M J Parcel # : 118.000 3035 03 Site : 11742 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : Mail : 11742 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $96, 300 YB: 1920 Q:NW S:07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 30 LOT 6-7-8 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 390 Ac: .20 Ph: 206-772-1793 * 11 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:BOWEN WILBUR E & TERRI Parcel # :420440 0202 04 Site : 315 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 07/16/86 Mail : 315 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $25, 000 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $147,200 YB: 1987 Q:NW S: 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 46 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF:2, 660 Ac: . 33 Ph:206-255-2228 * 12 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:BROCKWAY STEVEN C Parcel # : 118000 2580 04 Site : 8524 S 117TH PL SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 09/02/93 Mail : 8524 S 117TH PL SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $75, 700 YB: 1919 Q:NW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 24 LOT 30-31 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm:2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 890 Ac: . 13 Ph: * 13 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:BROCKWAY STEVEN C Parcel # : 118000 2580 04 Site : 8524 S 117TH PL SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 09/02/93 Mail : 8524 S 117TH PL SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $75, 700 YB: 1944 Q:NW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 24 LOT 30-31 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm: 1 Bth F3H: /1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF:550 Ac: . 13 Ph: * 14 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:BULLOCK RUSSELL E Parcel # : 118000 2660 07 Site : 8716 S 117TH PL SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : Mail : 8716 S 117TH PL SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $87, 800 YB: 1946 Q:NW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :BLK 25 LOT 9-10 BRYN MAWR ADD 9 & Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 .5 BldgSF: 1,290 Ac: . 11 Ph:206-772-4248 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • * 15 * - . MetroScan/King : _ Owner:CASE DOUGLAS H Parcel # : 118000 3120 09 Site : 8717 S 117TH PL SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : Mail :RR 2 PALMYRA MO 63461 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $123,500 YB: 1930 Q:NW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 30 LOT 23-24 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm:4 Bth F3H: 2/ / Stories : 1 .5 BldgSF:2, 980 Ac: . 13 Ph: * 16 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:CASE DOUGLAS H Parcel # : 118000 3110 01 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* Sale Date : Mail :RR 2 PALMYRA MO 63461 Sale Price: Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $38, 000 YB: Q:NW S: 07 T:23N R:05E Lgl:BLK 30 LOT 21-22 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: . 13 Ph: * 17 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:CHAMBERS RONALD G & OLGA B Parcel # :420440 0036 06 Site : 8804 7TH AVE S SEATTLE 98108 Sale Date : 02/14/95 Mail : 4249 E TIMBERLINE RD CLINTON WA 98236 Sale Price: $104,450 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $89, 800 YB: 1955 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 2 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 980 Ac: . 17 Ph: * 18 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:CHMICHZOWSKI WLADSLAW Parcel # :420440 0125 08 Site : 114 NW 3RD PL RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail :533 S 28TH PL RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 111 RES,APARTMENT,5 TO 9 UNITS Asd.V: $356,400 YB: 1989 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 40 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm:2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories :2 BldgSF: 8, 184 Ac: . 32 Ph: * 19 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:COFFIN JOANNE M Parcel # :420440 0201 05 Site : 321 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 321 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $90, 100 YB: 1948 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 46 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 120 Ac: . 17 Ph:206-226-5009 * 20 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:DADE PIERRE A Parcel # :420440 0096 03 Site :406 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 01/10/94 Mail :406 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $189, 950 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $171, 600 YB: 1991 Q: SW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 33 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories :2 BldgSF: 3,540 Ac: . 16 Ph: * 21 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:DINIUS JOHN L Parcel # :420440 0070 03 Site : 8918 7TH AVE S SEATTLE 98108 Sale Date : Mail : 8918 S 122ND ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $139, 100 YB: 1956 Q: SW S:07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 3 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF:2 ,500 Ac: . 32 Ph: 206-772-5716 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • * 22 * -- -. MetroScan/King : Owner:DONOHUE EDWARD V Parcel # :420440 0177 05 Site : 371 LIND AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 371 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $100, 500 YB: 1956 Q:NW S : 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 43 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT E Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF:2, 160 Ac: . 17 Ph: 206-772-5761 * 23 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:EDMUND DONALD A Parcel # : 118000 2560 08 Site : 8536 S 117TH PL SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : Mail : 8536 S 117TH PL SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $69, 800 YB: 1930 Q:NW S : 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 24 LOT 26-27 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm:2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 B1dgSF: 860 Ac: . 13 Ph:206-772-6369 * 24 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:ENEBRAD GERALD G/JESSIE G Parcel # :420440 0160 04 Site : 354 LIND AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 07/03/95 Mail : 354 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $120, 000 YB: 1947 Q:NW S : 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 42 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT W Bedrm: 5 Bth F3H: 1/2/ Stories : 1 BldgSF:2, 740 Ac: .22 Ph: * 25 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:FEASTER TOM G Parcel # : 420440 0303 02 Site : 264 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail :264 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $121,200 YB: 1965 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 57 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm: 4 Bth F3H: 1/1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF:2, 980 Ac: . 15 Ph: 206-226-6793 * 26 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:FEASTER TOM G Parcel # :420440 0299 08 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : Mail :264 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $43, 700 YB: Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lg1:LOT 57 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: .22 Ph:206-226-6793 * 27 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:FELDT CHRISTINE Parcel # : 118000 4215 03 Site : 11908 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 05/09/94 Mail : 11908 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $107 ,500 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $105, 600 YB: 1926 Q:NW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 40 LOT 2-3-4 BRYN MAWR ADD S Bedrm:2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF:2,240 Ac: . 18 Ph: * 28 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:FRANK BENNETT P Parcel # :420440 0200 06 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : Mail :522 SW LANGSTON RD RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $123,500 YB: Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 45 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT & Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : B1dgSF: Ac: 1 .52 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • ' j * 29 * -_- . MetroScan/King : - - * Owner:GALIMBA NESTOR H & DOLORES A Parcel # :420440 0173 09 Site : 364 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 09/30/92 Mail : 364 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $142,500 YB: 1969 Q:NW S: 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 43 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm: 6 Bth F3H: 1/1/1 Stories: 1 BldgSF: 3,220 Ac: . 18 Ph: * 30 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:GAVIN WILLIAM R Parcel # :420440 0302 03 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : Mail :265 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $42, 700 YB: Q:NW S : 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 57 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: . 18 Ph:206-226-8122 * 31 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:GAVIN WILLIAM R Parcel # :420440 0301 04 Site : 265 LIND AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail :265 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $111, 600 YB: 1958 Q:NW S: 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 57 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT E Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 2/ / Stories : 2 BldgSF: 1, 980 Ac: . 19 Ph: 206-226-8122 * 32 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:GEIGER BENJAMIN & GLADYS J Parcel # : 118000 2590 02 Site : 8518 S 117TH PL SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 01/19/95 Mail : 11817 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $53, 000 YB: 1940 Q:NW S : 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 24 LOT 32 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm: 1 Bth F3H: /1/ Stories : ]. BldgSF: 360 Ac: . 06 Ph: 206-772-0937 * 33 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:GEIGER BENJAMIN & GLADYS J Parcel # : 118000 2595 07 Site : 8516 S 117TH PL SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 01/19/95 Mail : 11817 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $78, 300 YB: 1923 Q:NW S: 07 T:23N R:05E Lgl:BLK 24 LOT 33-34 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 870 Ac: . 13 Ph: 206-772-0937 * 34 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:GEIGER CHARLES G & CAROLE S Parcel # : 118000 4230 04 Site : 11914 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 01/18/85 Mail : 11914 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $137, 600 YB: 1926 Q:NW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 40 LOT 5 THRU 11 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF:2, 020 Ac: . 67 Ph:206-772-0352 * 35 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:GIFFORD GREGORY S & LOU R Parcel # : 118000 2515 04 Site : 11713 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 06/06/85 Mail : 11713 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $42, 000 Use : 101 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $95, 700 YB: 1969 Q:NW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :BLK 24 LOT 20 & 21 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 720 Ac: . 13 Ph:206-772-4528 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • * 36 * MetroScan/King : - * Owner:GISTARB CHARLES L & ANITA D Parcel # :420440 0015 01 Site : 8716 7TH AVE S SEATTLE 98108 Sale Date : 05/22/95 Mail : 8716 S 122ND ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $130,000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $100,500 YB: 1955 Q:SW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 1 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 360 Ac: . 17 Ph: * 37 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:GRAHAM DOUGLAS J Parcel # :420440 0186 04 Site : 318 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 06/16/88 Mail : 318 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $77,500 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $127, 300 YB: 1935 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R:05E Lgl:LOT 44 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT Bedrm: 1 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : ]. BldgSF: 600 Ac: . 74 Ph:206-235-8364 * 38 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:GRAHAM DOUGLAS J Parcel # :420440 0186 04 Site : 318 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 06/16/88 Mail : 318 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $77,500 Use : 101 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $127, 300 YB: 1933 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 44 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT Bedrm:2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 .5 BldgSF: 1,530 Ac: .74 Ph:206-235-8364 * 39 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:GRANT PAT Parcel # :426820 0005 00 Site : 12030 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 06/20/94 Mail : 7824 S SUNNYCREST RD SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $48, 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $61, 000 YB: 1936 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 1 LENZ-FARMETTE TRS S 62 FT Bedrm: 1 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : ]. B1dgSF: 660 Ac: . 17 Ph: * 40 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:GULLA JOANNE Parcel # : 072305 9063 06 Site : 12016 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : Mail :W F LUTTMANN 12016 87 SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $79, 700 YB: 1955 Q: SW S : 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl: STR 072305 TAXLOT 63 S 75 FT OF W Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 820 Ac: . 19 Ph: * 41 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:GUSE JAMES A;DBA GUSE/ASSOC Parcel # :420440 0071 02 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : 01/24/92 Mail :PO BOX 4184 KENT WA 98032 Sale Price: $6, 000 FULL Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $19, 000 YB: Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 4 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: . 37 Ph: * 42 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:GUSTAFSON DAVID B & MAXINE T Parcel # :420440 0010 06 Site : 12100 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 10/18/94 Mail : 12100 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $103,400 YB: 1939 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 1 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 .5 BldgSF: 2, 140 Ac: . 20 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • * 43 * . MetroScan/King : Owner:HANCOCK LEROY A/MARVA Parcel # :420440 0162 02 Site : 355 MAPLE AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 10/06/95 Mail : 355 MAPLE AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $150, 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $128, 900 YB: 1977 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 42 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT E Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF: 2, 770 Ac: .22 Ph: * 44 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:HARRISON GARY L Parcel # :420440 0044 06 Site : 8817 S 121ST ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 01/03/83 Mail : 18015 ASHWORTH AVE N SEATTLE WA 98133 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $80,500 YB: 1949 Q: SW S:07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 2 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 880 Ac: . 16 Ph:206-546-8187 * 45 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:HASSEL WARREN & NOLA Parcel # :420440 0203 03 Site : 307 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 307 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 102 RES,DUPLEX Asd.V: $139, 300 YB: 1948 Q:NW S: 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lg1:LOT 46 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT E Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H: 2/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF:2, 340 Ac: . 38 Ph:206-255-7481 * 46 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:HASSEL WARREN & NOLA Parcel # :420440 0203 03 Site : 307 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 307 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 102 RES,DUPLEX Asd.V: $139, 300 YB: 1914 Q:NW S : 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 46 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT E Bedrm: 4 Bth F3H:2/1/ Stories : 1 .5 BldgSF:2, 450 Ac: . 38 Ph: 206-255-7481 * 47 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:HAUGE ROBERT B Parcel # : 118000 3825 07 Site : 11806 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : Mail : 11806 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $97, 100 YB: 1936 Q:NW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 35 LOT 3-4-5 BRYN MAWR ADD & Bedrm:2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 940 Ac: .22 Ph:206-772-6184 * 48 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:HAY PHYLLIS Parcel # :420440 0320 01 Site :218 NW 2ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail :218 NW 2ND ST RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $61, 200 YB: 1935 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 59 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 780 Ac: .20 Ph: * 49 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:HELPE HENRY A Parcel # : 118000 3050 03 Site : 3716 S 118TH ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : Mail : 8716 S 118TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $117, 300 YB: 1935 Q:NW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 30 LOT 9 THRU 12 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm:2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 330 Ac: . 35 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * 50 * MetroScan/King : Owner:HODO DANIEL J Parcel # : 118000 3000 04 Site : 11730 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 01/25/91 Mail : 11730 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $101, 000 YB: 1959 Q:NW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 30 LOT 1-2-3 BRYN MAWR ADD 1-2 Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ /1 Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1,470 Ac: . 15 Ph: * 51 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:HOFFMAN WILLIAM JR Parcel # : 420440 0040 00 Site : 8722 7TH AVE S SEATTLE 98108 Sale Date : Mail : 4510 SW HEINZE WAY SEATTLE WA 98136 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $74,500 YB: 1960 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 2 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : ]. BldgSF: 800 Ac: . 17 Ph:206-935-8574 * 52 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:HOGG ROBERT S Parcel # : 072305 9047 07 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* Sale Date : 02/04/86 M Mail : 245 CONEY ISLAND DR SPARKS NV 89431 Sale Price: $265, 000 Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $1, 000 YB: Q: SW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl: STR 072305 TAXLOT 47 N 105 FT OF E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: .22 Ph: * 53 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:HOLLINGWORTH FREDERICK T Parcel # : 118000 2670 05 Site : 8722 S 117TH PL SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 12/27/93 Mail : 8722 S 117TH PL SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $95, 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $83, 800 YB: 1930 Q:NW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 25 LOT 10-11-12 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 940 Ac: . 16 Ph: * 54 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:HOLLINQUEST ALVIN & ANNIE L Parcel # : 420440 0305 00 Site :260 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 05/25/84 Mail :260 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $82,500 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $146, 100 YB: 1981 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 57 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT W Bedrm: 4 Bth F3H:2/1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF:2,430 Ac: . 14 Ph:206-271-4534 * 55 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:HOLMS DANIEL E & J ANTHONY HO Parcel # : 426820 0060 02 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : 03/30/95 M Mail : 2688 BISHOP PL W SEATTLE WA 98199 Sale Price: $5, 000 FULL Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $19, 000 YB: Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 11 LENZ-FARMETTE TRS Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: .27 Ph: * 56 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:HOLMS DANIEL E & J ANTHONY HO Parcel # :426820 0065 07 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date :03/30/95 M Mail :2688 BISHOP PL W SEATTLE WA 98199 Sale Price: $5, 000 FULL Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $19, 000 YB: Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 12 LENZ-FARMETTE TRS LESS WLY Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: . 23 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • * 57 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:HULK DOUGLAS B Parcel # : 426820 0020 01 Site : 8718 S 121ST ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date :04/09/93 Mail : 8718 S 121ST ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $75, 000 FULL Use : 101 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $66, 300 YB: 1938 Q: SW S:07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 3 LENZ-FARMETTE TRS Bedrm: 1 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 620 Ac: .21 Ph: * 58 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:JACK JONATHAN A & PALMER CAND Parcel # :420440 0115 00 Site : 100 NW 3RD PL RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 03/31/95 Mail : 100 NW 3RD PL #3 RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $149, 990 FULL Use : 103 RES,TRIPLEX Asd.V: $94, 700 YB: 1911 Q:NW S: 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 39 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm:4 Bth F3H: 3/ / Stories : 1 .5 BldgSF: 2, 620 Ac: .08 Ph: * 59 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:JARVIS PATRICIA Parcel # : 072305 9003 09 Site : 12014 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 07/06/92 Mail :PO BOX 1056 RENTON WA 98057 Sale Price: $360, 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $341, 900 YB: 1930 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lg1: STR 072305 TAXLOT 3 S 3 AC OF N 5 Bedrm: 1 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 820 Ac: 1 . 80 Ph: * 60 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:JARVIS PATRICIA Parcel # : 072305 9002 00 Site : 12000 RAINIER AVE S Sale Date : Mail :PO BOX 1056 RENTON WA 98057 Sale Price: Use : 922 VACANT,COMMERCIAL, 1 TO 5 ACRES Asd.V: $105,500 YB: Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl: STR 072305 TAXLOT 2 N 2 AC OF GL 7 Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: 1 . 11 Ph: * 61 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:JARVIS PATRICIA Parcel # : 072305 9003 09 Site : 12014 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 07/06/92 Mail :PO BOX 1056 RENTON WA 98057 Sale Price: $360, 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $341, 900 YB: 1921 Q: SW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:STR 072305 TAXLOT 3 S 3 AC OF N 5 Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories : 1 .5 BldgSF: 3, 150 Ac: 1 . 80 Ph: * 62 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:JARVIS PATRICIA Parcel # : 072305 9003 09 Site : 12014 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 07/06/92 Mail :PO BOX 1056 RENTON WA 98057 Sale Price: $360, 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $341, 900 YB: 1978 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lg1: STR 072305 TAXLOT 3 S 3 AC OF N 5 Bedrm: 1 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 670 Ac: 1 . 80 Ph: * 63 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:JOHNSON RICKY D & KATHLEEN L Parcel # :420440 0030 02 Site : 8717 S 121ST ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 01/26/89 Mail : 8717 S 121ST ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $73, 948 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $107,500 YB: 1940 Q: SW S : 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 1 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H: 2/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 250 Ac: . 17 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • * 64 * - . MetroScan/King : Owner:JONES R R Parcel # :420440 0060 05 Site : 8820 7TH AVE S SEATTLE 98108 Sale Date : Mail : 8820 S 122ND ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $63, 100 YB: 1943 Q: SW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 3 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT W Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1,200 Ac: . 17 Ph:206-772-5959 * 65 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:KANGAS MARTIN F Parcel # :420440 0283 06 Site : 268 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 09/28/84 Mail : 268 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $33,500 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $51, 900 YB: 1942 Q:NW S : 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 54 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm: 1 Bth F3H: /1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF:520 Ac: . 10 Ph: 206-271-1188 * 66 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:KAYNAN Parcel # : 072305 9007 05 Site : 1011 PERIMETER RD W RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 06/11/90 Mail : 350 AIRPORT WAY S RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $320, 000 Use : 616 IND,TERMINALS,AIRPORT Asd.V: $28, 176, 300 YB: 1978 Q: SE S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl: STR 072305 TAXLOT 7 POR SECS 7 & Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 10, 772 Ac: 167 . 00 Ph: * 67 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:KAYNAN Parcel # : 072305 9007 05 Site : 1011 PERIMETER RD W RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 06/11/90 Mail : 350 AIRPORT WAY S RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $320, 000 Use : 616 IND,TERMINALS,AIRPORT Asd.V: $28, 176, 300 YB: 1978 Q:SE S : 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl: STR 072305 TAXLOT 7 POR SECS 7 & Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : 1 BldgSF:22,200 Ac: 167 . 00 Ph: * 68 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:KAYNAN Parcel # : 072305 9007 05 Site : 1011 PERIMETER RD W RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 06/11/90 Mail : 350 AIRPORT WAY S RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $320, 000 Use : 616 IND,TERMINALS,AIRPORT Asd.V: $28, 176, 300 YB: 1987 Q: SE S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl: STR 072305 TAXLOT 7 POR SECS 7 & Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 800 Ac: 167 . 00 Ph: * 69 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:KAYNAN Parcel # : 072305 9007 05 Site : 1011 PERIMETER RD W RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 06/11/90 Mail : 350 AIRPORT WAY S RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $320, 000 Use : 616 IND,TERMINALS,AIRPORT Asd.V: $28, 176, 300 YB: 1987 Q: SE S : 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl: STR 072305 TAXLOT 7 POR SECS 7 & Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : 1 BldgSF:23, 600 Ac: 167 . 00 Ph: * 70 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:KLEPACH KENNETH J Parcel # :426820 0055 09 Site : 8916 S 121ST ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : Mail : 8916 S 121ST ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $120, 600 YB: 1954 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 10 & 12 LENZ-FARMETTE TRS 10 & Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 740 Ac: .26 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • * 71 * -- . MetroScan/King : Owner:KLSW ASSOCIATES Parcel # :420440 0314 09 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : Mail :PO BOX 11988 SPOKANE WA 99211 Sale Price: Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $66,500 YB: Q:NW S : 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 59 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT W Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: .53 Ph: * 72 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:KLSW ASSOCIATES Parcel # :420440 0316 07 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : Mail :PO BOX 11988 SPOKANE WA 99211 Sale Price: Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $66, 500 YB: Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 59 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: .53 Ph: * 73 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:KLSW ASSOCIATES Parcel # : 420440 0310 03 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : Mail :PO BOX 11988 SPOKANE WA 99211 Sale Price: Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $156, 700 YB: Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 58 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT & Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: 1 . 79 Ph: * 74 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:KNEE ARVID C Parcel # : 420440 0225 07 Site : 313 RAINIER AVE N RENTON 98055 Sale Date :01/25/93 M Mail : 313 RAINIER AVE N RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $200, 000 Use : 403 PUB,AUTOMOTIVE,RETAIL Asd.V: $93, 800 YB: 1979 Q:NW S : 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 48 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 748 Ac: . 10 Ph: * 75 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:KNEE ARVID C Parcel # :420440 0225 07 Site : 313 RAINIER AVE N RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 01/25/93 M Mail : 313 RAINIER AVE N RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $200,000 Use : 403 PUB,AUTOMOTIVE,RETAIL Asd.V: $93, 800 YB: 1986 Q:NW S : 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 48 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : 1 BldgSF:480 Ac: . 10 Ph: * 76 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:KOHL EXCAVATING INC Parcel # : 118000 3070 09 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : Mail : 3330 E VALLEY RD RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 921 VACANT,COMMERCIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $5, 000 YB: Q:NW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :BLK 30 LOT 13-14-15-16 BRYN MAWR Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: . 44 Ph:206-251-8820 * 77 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:KOING NORN & KET BIRN Parcel # : 118000 2605 05 Site : 8508 S 117TH PL SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 01/09/90 Mail : 8508 S 117TH PL SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $88, 000 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $87, 500 YB: 1956 Q:NW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 24 LOT 35-36 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 030 Ac: . 13 Ph: 206-772-0931 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * 78 * MetroScan/King : Owner:KRAMER ROBERT W & ANITA J Parcel # :420440 0100 07 Site : 365 RAINIER AVE N RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 03/14/89 Mail : 355 RAINIER AVE N RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 532 IND, SERVICE BLDG, 2K TO 10K SQFT Asd.V: $1, 036, 800 YB: 1988 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 39 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PALT N Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 3, 600 Ac: . 73 Ph:206-226-3860 * 79 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:KRAMER ROBERT W & ANITA J Parcel # :420440 0100 07 Site : 365 RAINIER AVE N RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 03/14/89 Mail : 355 RAINIER AVE N RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use :532 IND, SERVICE BLDG,2K TO 10K SQFT Asd.V: $1, 036, 800 YB: 1988 Q:NW S: 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 39 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PALT N Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 6, 000 Ac: . 73 Ph:206-226-3860 * 80 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:KRAMER ROBERT W Parcel # :420440 0120 03 Site : 355 RAINIER AVE N RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 355 RAINIER AVE N RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use :251 COM,RETAIL STORE,LESS THAN 10K SQFT Asd.V: $196, 100 YB: 1954 Q:NW S: 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 39 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : 1 BldgSF:4, 204 Ac: . 12 Ph:206-226-3860 * 81 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:LANG KATHRYN G Parcel # : 420440 0307 08 Site :256 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 06/01/89 Mail : 256 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $95, 000 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $107, 800 YB: 1957 Q:NW S : 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 57 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm:5 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF:2,460 Ac: .22 Ph: 206-277-8163 * 82 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:LARSON MATTHEW R & JENNIFER K Parcel # :420440 0193 05 Site : 312 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 06/16/88 Mail : 312 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $69, 950 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $131,200 YB: 1936 Q:NW S : 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 44 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm:4 Bth F3H: 1/ /1 Stories :2 BldgSF:2, 700 Ac: . 41 Ph:206-271-5807 * 83 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:LIDZBARSKI RICHARD & ZOFIA Parcel # :420440 0175 07 Site : 360 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 11/21/89 Mail : 360 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $203,700 YB: 1991 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 43 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT W Bedrm:5 Bth F3H: 3/ /1 Stories :2 BldgSF:2, 920 Ac: .22 Ph: * 84 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:LITTLE THOMAS W & LAURA Parcel # :420440 0206 00 Site : 320 MAPLE AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 11/07/90 Mail : 320 MAPLE AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $160, 100 YB: 1992 Q:NW S: 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 46 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF: 3, 180 Ac: . 30 Ph: 206-277-8374 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • * 85 * MetroScan/King : -\_ * Owner:LIU SAM B Parcel # : 420440 0135 06 Site : 360 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 2150 N 107TH NUMBER 320 SEATTLE WA 98133 Sale Price: Use : 112 RES,APARTMENT, 10 TO 49 UNITS Asd.V: $1,506,200 YB: 1968 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 40 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm: 1 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 3 BldgSF: 40, 987 Ac: . 91 Ph: * 86 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:LY NGHIEP M & LY TRUONG M Parcel # :420440 0092 07 Site :403 LIND AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 01/26/90 Mail :403 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $188,503 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $176, 800 YB: 1989 Q: SW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 33 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:2/1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF: 3, 740 Ac: . 16 Ph: * 87 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:MARR ALMA F/PRISCILLA F;GROVE CAROLYN J Parcel # :426820 0035 04 Site : 8810 S 121ST ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 11/07/95 Mail : 1514 2ND ST SNOHOMISH WA 98290 Sale Price: $50, 859 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $68, 100 YB: 1948 Q: SW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 6 LENZ-FARMETTE TRS Bedrm:2 Bth F3H: /1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF: 660 Ac: .21 Ph: * 88 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:MATHEWSON/KRANZ Parcel # : 420440 0260 03 Site : 309 NELSON VAC PL NW RENTON Sale Date : 11/01/91 Mail :PO BOX 238 HOBART WA 98025 Sale Price: $182,500 FULL Use :921 VACANT,COMMERCIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $1, 000 YB: Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 53 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: . 03 Ph: * 89 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:MATHEWSON/KRANZ Parcel # :420440 0261 02 Site :271 RAINIER AVE N RENTON 98055 Sale Date :04/23/90 Mail :271 RAINIER AVE N RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use :533 IND,SERVICE BLDG, 10K TO 25K SQFT Asd.V: $652,200 YB: 1990 Q:NW S: 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 53 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories :2 BldgSF: 11,442 Ac: .47 Ph: * 90 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:MATHEWSON/KRANZ Parcel # :420440 0262 01 Site :RAINIER AVE N RENTON Sale Date : 11/01/91 Mail :2271 RAINIER AVE N RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $182, 500 Use :401 PUB,PARKING,ASSOCIATED Asd.V: $158, 100 YB: Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 53 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: . 36 Ph: * 91 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:MC CRUM FRANK H Parcel # :420440 0098 01 Site :410 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail :410 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $124, 900 YB: 1963 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 33 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm:5 Bth F3H: 1/1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF:2, 380 Ac: . 18 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * 92 * MetroScan/King : - Owner:MCCLURG ROBERT Parcel # : 420440 0150 06 Site : 353 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 353 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $111, 100 YB: 1927 Q:NW S: 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 41 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT Bedrm: 4 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 .5 BldgSF: 3, 100 Ac: . 27 Ph:206-277-0083 * 93 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:MCGANN MARTIN & SANDEE K Parcel # :420440 0325 06 Site : 304 NW 2ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 05/08/89 Mail : 304 NW 2ND ST RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $45, 000 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $85, 300 YB: 1956 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 59 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 B1dgSF: 1, 350 Ac: .20 Ph: * 94 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:MCINTYRE R P Parcel # : 118000 2550 00 Site : 8540 S 117TH PL SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : Mail : 8540 S 117TH PL SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $85, 900 YB: 1943 Q:NW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 24 LOT 24-25 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 290 Ac: . 13 Ph: * 95 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:MELDRUM TED W Parcel # :420440 0097 02 Site :405 LIND AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail :405 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $142, 900 YB: 1963 Q: SW S : 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 33 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm:4 Bth F3H: 1/1/ Stories : 1 B1dgSF: 3, 370 Ac: . 18 Ph:206-772-6015 * 96 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:MEYER MICHAEL F Parcel # : 118000 3100 03 Site : 8731 S 117TH PL SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 01/03/90 Mail : 8731 S 117TH PL SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $25, 000 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $47,200 YB: 1938 Q:NW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :BLK 30 LOT 19-20 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm: 1 Bth F3H: /1/ Stories : 1 B1dgSF:410 Ac: . 13 Ph:206-772-9145 * 97 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:MINKLER ENTERPRISES Parcel # :420440 0355 09 Site :251 RAINIER AVE N RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 1701 KENNEWICK AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 Sale Price: Use : 252 COM,RETAIL STORE, 10K-25K SQFT Asd.V: $590, 600 YB: 1961 Q:NW S : 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 62 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT & Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : 1 B1dgSF: 6, 964 Ac: 1 . 17 Ph:206-228-2545 * 98 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:MINKLER ENTERPRISES Parcel # :420440 0355 09 Site :251 RAINIER AVE N RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 1701 KENNEWICK AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 Sale Price: Use :252 COM,RETAIL STORE, 10K-25K SQFT Asd.V: $590, 600 YB: 1961 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 62 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT & Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 166 Ac: 1 . 17 Ph:206-228-2545 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * 99 * -- - . MetroScan/King : * Owner:MINKLER ENTERPRISES Parcel # :420440 0355 09 Site :251 RAINIER AVE N RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 1701 KENNEWICK AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 Sale Price: Use :252 COM,RETAIL STORE, 10K-25K SQFT Asd.V: $590, 600 YB: 1946 Q:NW S: 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 62 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT & Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : 1 BldgSF:2,424 Ac: 1 . 17 Ph:206-228-2545 * 100 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:MORGAN WALLACE K Parcel # : 118000 3850 05 Site : 11900 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 11/05/93 Mail : 11900 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $143,500 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $116, 800 YB: 1983 Q:NW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT POR BRYN MAWR POR W 1/2 OF VAC Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/1/ Stories : 1 .5 BldgSF: 2,490 Ac: . 13 Ph: * 101 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:MUNSON RONALD W & ELIZABETH A Parcel # :420440 0335 04 Site :207 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 01/04/89 Mail : 8648 S 134TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $90, 000 Use : 101 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $151, 000 YB: 1944 Q:NW S: 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 60 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm:2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF:2, 100 Ac: .45 Ph:206-228-5662 * 102 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:MUNSON RONALD W & ELIZABETH A Parcel # :420440 0335 04 Site :207 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date :01/04/89 Mail : 8648 S 134TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $90, 000 Use : 101 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $151, 000 YB: 1964 Q:NW S: 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 60 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm:4 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 000 Ac: . 45 Ph: 206-228-5662 * 103 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:NAGY ALEX/KINAM Parcel # :420440 0068 07 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : 01/24/92 Mail : 14043 7TH PL S SEATTLE WA 98168 Sale Price: $5, 000 FULL Use :901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $19,000 YB: Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 4 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: . 31 Ph: * 104 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:NETTLEBECK KENNETH Parcel # : 118000 2540 03 Site : 11717 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 12/22/95 Mail : 11717 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $92,500 YB: 1922 Q:NW S : 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 24 LOT 22-23 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF:2, 140 Ac: . 13 Ph: * 105 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner:NOVAK WALTER V Parcel # :420440 0005 03 Site : 12116 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : Mail : 12116 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $122, 100 YB: 1940 Q: SW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 1 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm:2 Bth F3H: 1/ /1 Stories : 1 .5 B1dgSF:2, 280 Ac: .23 Ph: 206-772-6659 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • * 106 * - MetroScan/King : Owner:OSOTIO ROBERT 0 & MARIA L Parcel # : 118000 4205 05 Site : 11902 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 02/01/85 Mail : 11902 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $60, 000 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $81, 900 YB: 1955 Q:NW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 40 LOT 1-2 BRYN MAWR ADD 1 & N Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 160 Ac: . 16 Ph: * 107 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:OSOTIO ROBERT 0 Parcel # :420440 0099 00 Site :414 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 414 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $136, 300 YB: 1963 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 33 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT W Bedrm:5 Bth F3H: 1/1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF: 3, 000 Ac: . 18 Ph:206-772-6756 * 108 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:PFIEFFER G R Parcel # : 420440 0056 01 Site : 8907 S 121ST ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : Mail : 8907 S 121ST ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $117,500 YB: 1940 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lg1:LOT 3 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ /1 Stories : 1 .5 BldgSF:2, 350 Ac: . 17 Ph: 206-772-5254 * 109 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:POPE W STEWART TRSTEE Parcel # : 420440 0263 00 Site : 257 RAINIER AVE N RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 12/31/86 Mail : 1655 BROADMOOR DR E SEATTLE WA 98112 Sale Price: Use :251 COM,RETAIL STORE,LESS THAN 10K SQFT Asd.V: $238, 700 YB: 1970 Q:NW S : 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 53 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT & Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 3, 102 Ac: . 37 Ph:206-322-1572 * 110 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:PORTER GOLDIE Parcel # :420440 0279 02 Site :263 HARDIE AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail :263 HARDIE AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $83, 600 YB: 1920 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lg1 :LOT 54 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 .5 B1dgSF: 1, 840 Ac: . 18 Ph: 206-228-1526 * 111 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:RANDLES MATTHEW J & MARIAN L Parcel # :420440 0265 08 Site :271 HARDIE AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 05/17/91 Mail :271 HARDIE AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $98,500 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $98, 100 YB: 1921 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 54 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories : 1 .5 BldgSF:2, 330 Ac: .22 Ph: * 112 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:RENTON ASSEMBLY OF GOD Parcel # : 420440 0340 07 Site :221 HARDIE AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail :221 HARDIE AVE NW #02661- RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use :407 PUB,CHURCH,RELIGIOUS SERVICES Asd.V: $1, 634, 800 YB: 1961 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lg1:LOT 61 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories :2 BldgSF: 36, 066 Ac: 1 . 37 Ph:206-226-0880 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • * 113 * MetroScan/King : Owner:RENTON ASSEMBLY OF GOD Parcel # :420440 0338 01 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : Mail :221 HARDIE AVE NW #02661- RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $23, 700 YB: Q:NW S : 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 60 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: . 10 Ph:206-226-0880 * 114 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:RENTON ASSEMBLY OF GOD Parcel # : 420440 0333 06 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : Mail :221 HARDIE AVE NW #02661- RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $23, 700 YB: Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 60 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : B1dgSF: Ac: . 10 Ph:206-226-0880 * 115 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:RENTON ASSEMBLY OF GOD Parcel # : 420440 0329 02 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : Mail : 221 HARDIE AVE NW #02661- RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $42, 700 YB: Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 60 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : B1dgSF: Ac: . 18 Ph:206-226-0880 * 116 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:RENTON ASSEMBLY OF GOD Parcel # :420440 0340 07 Site :221 HARDIE AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail :221 HARDIE AVE NW #02661- RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use :407 PUB,CHURCH,RELIGIOUS SERVICES Asd.V: $1, 634, 800 YB: 1976 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 61 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : ]. BldgSF:2, 014 Ac: 1 . 37 Ph: 206-226-0880 * 117 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:RENTON ASSEMBLY OF GOD Parcel # :420440 0275 06 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : Mail :221 HARDIE AVE NW #02661- RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $33,200 YB: Q:NW S: 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 54 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: . 19 Ph:206-226-0880 * 118 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:RENTON ASSEMBLY OF GOD Parcel # :420440 0340 07 Site :221 HARDIE AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail :221 HARDIE AVE NW #02661- RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use :407 PUB,CHURCH,RELIGIOUS SERVICES Asd.V: $1, 634, 800 YB: 1976 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 61 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories :2 BldgSF: 11, 879 Ac: 1 . 37 Ph:206-226-0880 * 119 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:RENTON ASSEMBLY OF GOD Parcel # :420440 0270 01 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : Mail :221 HARDIE AVE NW #02661- RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $47,500 YB: Q:NW S: 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 54 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: . 31 Ph:206-226-0880 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * 120 * MetroScan/King : Owner:RENTON ASSEMBLY OF GOD Parcel # :420440 0345 02 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : Mail :221 HARDIE AVE NW #02661- RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $47, 500 YB: Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 61 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: .44 Ph:206-226-0880 * 121 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:ROEDDER STEPHEN R & JULIE A Parcel # :420440 0176 06 Site : 357 LIND AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date :08/17/84 Mail : 357 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $114, 900 YB: 1918 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 43 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF:2, 100 Ac: . 34 Ph:206-271-2498 * 122 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:RUFFALO SAM J Parcel # :426820 0010 03 Site : 12018 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 04/24/87 Mail : 12018 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $93, 700 YB: 1940 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lg1:LOT 1-2 LENZ-FARMETTE TRS N 3 FT Bedrm:2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 960 Ac: .20 Ph: 206-772-6538 * 123 * : MetroScan/King : Owner: SAMMALISTO RITA E Parcel # :420440 0178 04 Site : 363 LIND AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 363 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $115, 900 YB: 1963 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 43 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H: 1/1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF:2, 680 Ac: . 17 Ph: 206-255-2802 * 124 * : MetroScan/King : * Owner: SAULS-JACOBS BARBARA E Parcel # :426820 0040 07 Site : 8814 S 121ST ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 09/14/92 Mail : 8814 S 121ST ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $76,500 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $74, 100 YB: 1943 Q: SW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 7 LENZ-FARMETTE TRS Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 970 Ac: .21 Ph: * 125 * : MetroScan/King : Owner: SCHLITZER TIMOTHY J Parcel # :420440 0174 08 Site : 368 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 368 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 102 RES,DUPLEX Asd.V: $146, 100 YB: 1959 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 43 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT W Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories :2 BldgSF: 2, 120 Ac: . 34 Ph:206-772-5683 * 126 * : MetroScan/King : Owner: SHIRAZI MEHRDAD Z/ELAINE S Parcel # : 420440 0334 05 Site :214 NW 2ND ST RENTON 98055 Sale Date :07/14/95 M Mail :214 NW 2ND ST RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $75, 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $50, 000 YB: 1950 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 60 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT W Bedrm: 1 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 670 Ac: .24 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * 127 * : MetroScan/King : Owner: SHIRAZI MEHRDAD Z/ELAINE S Parcel # :420440 0336 03 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : 07/14/95 M Mail :214 NW 2ND ST RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $75, 000 FULL Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $22, 500 YB: Q:NW S : 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 60 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: . 24 Ph: * 128 * : MetroScan/King : Owner: SLETTEN RODNEY A Parcel # :420440 0306 09 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : Mail :255 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $42, 700 YB: Q:NW S: 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 57 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: . 18 Ph: * 129 * : MetroScan/King : Owner: SNYDER LEROY J Parcel # : 118000 2820 04 Site : 11717 RAINIER AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : Mail : 8736 S 117TH PL SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 911 VACANT,MULTIPLE,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $18, 000 YB: Q:NW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :BLK 26 LOT 5-6-7-8 BRYN MAWR ADD W Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: . 10 Ph: * 130 * : MetroScan/King : Owner: SNYDER LEROY J Parcel # : 118000 2685 08 Site : 8736 S 117TH PL SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : Mail : 8736 S 117TH PL SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $144, 900 YB: 1929 Q:NW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :BLK 25 LOT 15-16 & BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm: 4 Bth F3H: 1/1/1 Stories : 1 . 5 BldgSF: 3, 350 Ac: . 17 Ph: * 131 * : MetroScan/King : Owner: SOURS DAVID K & KAREN K Parcel # :420440 0035 07 Site : 8805 S 121ST ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 11/06/91 Mail : 8805 S 121ST ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $120, 000 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $109, 600 YB: 1940 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 2 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm:2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 . 5 BldgSF:2, 230 Ac: . 17 Ph: 206-772-5363 * 132 * : MetroScan/King : Owner: SPEARS JAMES W Parcel # : 118000 3090 05 Site : 8735 S 117TH PL SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 10/09/92 Mail : 8735 S 117TH PL SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $52 , 600 YB: 1943 Q:NW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 30 LOT 17-18 BRYN MAWR ADD & Bedrm:2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 630 Ac: .20 Ph: 206-772-2894 * 133 * : MetroScan/King : Owner: STARK MYRNA L Parcel # : 420440 0041 09 Site : 8721 S 121ST ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 04/06/89 Mail : 8721 S 121ST ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $79, 503 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $111, 300 YB: 1942 Q: SW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 2 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 2, 370 Ac: . 17 Ph:206-772-6398 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * 134 * -. MetroScan/King : - -- Owner:STETTEN RODNEY A & CARLA J Parcel # :420440 0308 07 Site :255 LIND AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail :255 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $108, 100 YB: 1961 Q:NW S: 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 57 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm:4 Bth F3H: 1/1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF:2,080 Ac: . 18 Ph: * 135 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:STOCKMYER MEARL S Parcel # :420440 0277 04 Site :264 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail :264 TAYLOR AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $63,400 YB: 1952 Q:NW S: 18 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 54 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT S Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 760 Ac: . 13 Ph: * 136 * : MetroScan/King : Owner: STOUTENBERG ROBERT A Parcel # :426820 0045 02 Site : 8904 S 121ST ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : Mail : 8904 S 121ST ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $116,400 YB: 1953 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 8 LENZ-FARMETTE TRS Bedrm:5 Bth F3H: 1/1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF:2, 320 Ac: .21 Ph: 206-772-5659 * 137 * : MetroScan/King : Owner: SWENSON HAROLD V Parcel # :426820 0050 04 Site : 8908 S 121ST ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 10/24/91 Mail : 8908 S 121ST ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $110,200 YB: 1940 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 9 LENZ-FARMETTE TRS Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 .5 BldgSF: 1, 680 Ac: .21 Ph: 206-772-5216 * 138 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:TANG HANG NHUAN & MUOI Parcel # :420440 0094 05 Site : 401 LIND AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 07/24/90 Mail :401 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $217, 503 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $206, 300 YB: 1990 Q: SW S : 07 T:23N R:05E Lgl:LOT 33 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT Bedrm:5 Bth F3H:2/1/1 Stories :2 BldgSF: 3,570 Ac: .21 Ph: * 139 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:TAYLOR CLIFTON L & KAREN S Parcel # :426820 0030 09 Site : 8728 S 121ST ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 05/05/89 Mail : 8728 S 121ST ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $112 ,248 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $111,200 YB: 1935 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 5 LENZ-FARMETTE TRS Bedrm:4 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 .5 BldgSF: 3, 020 Ac: . 21 Ph: * 140 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:THANG PHLOEUN H & REN & SOK RIE Parcel # : 118000 2680 03 Site : 8728 S 117TH PL SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 05/01/92 Mail : 8728 S 117TH PL SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $175, 000 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $150, 300 YB: 1991 Q:NW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 25 LOT 13-14-15 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm:5 Bth F3H:2/ /1 Stories :2 BldgSF:2, 230 Ac: . 17 Ph:206-772-7146 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * 141 * MetroScan/King : Owner:THOMAS JEFFREY B Parcel # :420440 0059 08 Site : 8901 S 121ST ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date :04/19/91 Mail :8901 S 121ST ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $97, 000 YB: 1957 Q: SW S : 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 3 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ /1 Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 180 Ac: . 17 Ph: * 142 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:THOMAS RACHEL L Parcel # :420440 0049 01 Site : 8810 7TH AVE S SEATTLE 98108 Sale Date : 10/02/92 Mail : 8810 S 122ND ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $126, 300 YB: 1955 Q:SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 2 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT W Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF:2, 940 Ac: . 19 Ph:206-772-5625 * 143 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:THOMPSON SAXON V Parcel # :420440 0184 06 Site : 323 LIND AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : Mail : 323 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $83, 200 YB: 1921 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 44 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT E Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories :2 BldgSF: 2,280 Ac: .27 Ph: * 144 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:TOM JOHN D & KATHLEEN M Parcel # : 118000 3012 00 Site : 11736 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 08/11/88 Mail : 11736 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $50, 000 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $78, 700 YB: 1948 Q:NW S : 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 30 LOT 3-4-5 BRYN MAWR ADD 4-5 Bedrm:2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF:780 Ac: . 18 Ph:206-772-7731 * 145 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:TOMAN JOHN S Parcel # : 072305 9050 01 Site : 12006 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : Mail : 12006 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $104, 000 YB: 1940 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl: STR 072305 TAXLOT 50 N 105 FT OF E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H: 1/1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 730 Ac: . 48 Ph: 206-772-4791 * 146 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:VALENTIN EDUARDO M Parcel # : 118000 3840 08 Site : 11816 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 03/08/95 Mail : 14895 INTERURBAN AVE S #46 TUKWILA WA 98168 Sale Price: $125, 000 FULL Use : 101 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $124, 400 YB: 1957 Q:NW S:07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :BLK 35 LOT 6-7-8 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/ /1 Stories : 1 BldgSF:2, 160 Ac: .20 Ph: * 147 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:WARNER PINKEY L Parcel # :420440 0155 01 Site : 350 MAPLE AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 05/20/91 Mail : 350 MAPLE AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $124, 990 FULL Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $117,500 YB: 1982 Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :LOT 41 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/1/1 Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 980 Ac: . 18 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • * 148 * MetroScan/King : Owner:WOLSTED JIM & JOYCE Parcel # :420440 0204 02 Site : *NO SITE ADDRESS* RENTON Sale Date : 09/02/94 Mail : 17433 SE 192ND DR RENTON WA 98058 Sale Price: $24, 000 Use : 901 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL,LESS THAN 1 ACRE Asd.V: $33, 200 YB: Q:NW S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 46 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : BldgSF: Ac: . 16 Ph:206-228-6870 * 149 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:WONG KEVIN & TIN YUEN Parcel # : 118000 3815 09 Site : 11802 87TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 12/23/88 Mail : 11802 87TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $98, 902 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $142, 700 YB: 1980 Q:NW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl :BLK 35 LOT 1-2 BRYN MAWR ADD & POR Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories :2 BldgSF: 2, 040 Ac: . 14 Ph:206-772-3309 * 150 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:WOODWARD JERRY ROSS Parcel # :420440 0046 04 Site : 8816 S 122ND ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 10/23/91 Mail : 8816 S 122ND ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $122, 000 YB: 1945 Q:SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 2 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT E Bedrm: 1 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 820 Ac: . 19 Ph: 206-772-2809 * 151 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:WU GEORGE & VICKY K Parcel # : 420440 0093 06 Site : 411 LIND AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 07/19/90 Mail : 411 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: $155, 000 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $124, 400 YB: 1964 Q: SW S:07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 33 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT E . Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF:2, 650 Ac: . 18 Ph: * 152 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:WYSOCKI HENRY J Parcel # : 118000 2615 03 Site : 8502 S 117TH PL SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 10/27/87 Mail : 8233 S 123RD PL SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: $42, 000 Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $72, 600 YB: 1948 Q:NW S : 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 24 LOT 37-38 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 710 Ac: . 13 Ph: 206-772-4146 * 153 * : MetroScan/King : Owner:YEAGER BRAD L Parcel # : 420440 0095 04 Site : 402 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON 98055 Sale Date : 12/02/88 Mail : 402 STEVENS AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $143, 900 YB: 1965 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 33 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT Bedrm: 4 Bth F3H: 1/1/2 Stories : 1 BldgSF: 3,280 Ac: .21 Ph:206-772-5834 * 154 * : MetroScan/King : Owner: ZABLOUDIL CHRISTINE Parcel # : 420440 0048 02 Site : 8809 S 121ST ST SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 01/09/86 Mail : 8809 S 121ST ST SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $110,400 YB: 1950 Q: SW S: 07 T:23N R: 05E Lgl:LOT 2 LATIMERS N H LAKE WN PLAT N Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H: 1/1/ Stories : 1 BldgSF: 1, 760 Ac: . 16 Ph:206-772-1292 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * 155 * MetroScan/King : - * Owner: ZEBROSKI CAROLINE F Parcel # : 118000 2570 06 Site : 8532 S 117TH PL SEATTLE 98178 Sale Date : 08/13/91 Mail : 8532 S 117TH PL SEATTLE WA 98178 Sale Price: Use : 101 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Asd.V: $67, 900 YB: 1930 Q:NW S: 07 T: 23N R: 05E Lgl:BLK 24 LOT 28-29 BRYN MAWR ADD Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories : 1 BldgSF: 900 Ac: . 13 Ph:206-772-2808 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. NOTICE OF IA :.3POSED SITE APPROVAL ,-.v PLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Approval (SA) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS/LUA-96-038,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Leitzke Architects, seeks approval to construct a 106 unit apartment complex on a 7.57 acre site. The project includes seven buildings containing 10 to 20 dwelling units each and a recreation building. . GENERAL LOCATION: Rainier Avenue South &South 119th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. y-1.I.Y.Ii,IS.0,43of(` ..fin 1 I.,as 1-1 8. 'I.,I<:;:r.I<o 9�15TA ;,,"= 1 -S //7TH ST a ,., .5 d ,1 1 Q 11 1 RI"."1'II'.1 ai . „ .3`s+-,•C7 - � �I' IY 4I il1i1I�1 ii.1: 61 9:'\�I',7"--- �\ 11 "n ._ID Il It 13(9• 1,23156��ID II I3 W�5 1�8�u�_ ;l w�3tCZ'.7C..' Q _❑•1�,, a ` __ 420 'iii F■ .�1817 I. 36736 13 I�30292621262552244 1 u 3 I�71,I-87 I I6i C ;Pei , II' I�^ �{1 Pi li>' 11..E. q 11, ro.-+ . , 7223 ?'4 1, 11311 E imam 1 i 1111 /�/ ,� �o _ o 1_2_>.. I S.` — //7TH 'R5•61 N1T1A+i'L. e S1Na1. 'f•M. `4,,0: 'I ill i +r3 s0 � � �PO '�lIb _ w "'-i q t. II r•. .RAs� � 1 1 i i 11 I �1ILFPPL1�,�,;I, �+s,��° D�Y n �ma, p4RI! �1�1151y�+,�� yl�:�el 0 1 cc � ' ci 1.-�'3..'+'.-6 7..�338i„'�II ._.is 42 •n_ '.s_ m". , _: _,;,11A 'O- IG� 1, �-I r1 •u■a 3831 ��321'�1�'129282126 524 12111��g,.S T 6 9 3�I616j 1 II' 10`� �lia `1 • OJ [f � 14 t; I•d , 123 iM1'N- '16. 8 .!I. I. a i.. 1 .k ,11.-ii,-L; • ,11 1• !I 1 S nerH ST fo ✓ACATED �1 1�s 1 cat. 3 �Y$o if • km:1;1A+a,� •- :. - 3a„T—_ m eta 3 Ie, 1� �1 �� n, �� I' .2 . , ��r . 4 4• 1,2 3 4 5 6 7,,, 9 10 11 lb ,A,4}IS -t r ! . 6 V 30 0 18 11 014�,I6 17 z 96 1, j', '{��j1�`' 38'.373 5343 3,31 �j9282b262524 '21 e-1" 0 91•I.12 13 14 5 15j '[p TII ,: � m y 13�r `II 1 FUN O;Q 3 d��l�l ❑a A24 122 1 .� •".'Pl clI 11.1--!♦ Z 111 1 f� 5s. Lli ,,� .,0 23i s 4,o.__.1• p 90 1.._r� 11 ' it+s �; _ I5�lr 1� OP}SYZtY r S //�Til „ A p . ST �i ' • Mv$4} e1cirE$ ';� '1; -0 41w i. 3036•30 30;�jpla,3c 1,OeN raw gm r r a -1".- O I ■A�11 II N �r'��- II 31 Ii YN.19 ID 1N, ' -1 2 9 5 7„g{ 10 0 12137415 r I}1•23,01201918 IJ •II6•i17 18 19 120 2,3; R~j �I 11 IIIIIf 0 ■ �� '4; 11 I 73 25(;•im 1,35173r35Y3 3231N30,19.'2J82f7f7�262$$�tt Mire 1., • _ e '9 I. I'2 13 W 5•BI '1,5141312II I'9 6� .66 1„ 'Ih Ill :11 'A 1''.1 'COP:. 1. .`•I,`;1,11,' M 9) . .2�_-')P—.,,l, _IP*, L•_ J_i_.2oJe1p__ `' 1i‘, i11t �--I $ /2�TH m ST " -1,-�, —,—_ - __ vecare____.. ' m ' .n.a • 17OVI.TO�7 O2z A6 RUOY J 5TARKOYICH I1 / 11-'1 •1'.� 'Jr•'�,q N I � I �"� uVJ JI � Ilfrt ' 11003 LJm 1��'71, I 8 4i ,3.4-,�P rps nJ I.I2- 2,2 }I I� ,Ip I• • I 1 a'�i''I1'1 9 YW6 leeit"L'-1 1. ,tb9 __�_ \ Il .4,5 i 110 11 12.13 14 1 3141516 7 i8 41t{�II 12 l 1 tpo� -_ __ _____-------tg"25242318171615 3831'�36 3 31 . ,7N_ OUCH JST44005ICH LBOAa(9 11 Ioy� �j �9;38�212625�k PI `.�.', .t 7 ."1P. „ r .1 n 1t.;63 us '' ri' el\ 111,E 4�`P ,��. 3� � 11 S /2/ST STa 4,4 ,R3 ;34 1 55 . 1�-,_IE•�akc r '!,f P �'�1 t 3 ea F `:--' �g I�7I�n'� � ;--Iieoio l�4E 1EFI1'��.�� ' ° 12 3 = �`41, 4ISi�I�19j011 11314 213�•6SI7151,IItl'�m �°_LZ°1__>s 1__�T__L__l�_J�P LN__LNt '1 1 _. i ii •1'9 .335 ../��S/ hareo [L�,gr a $•I 11 i� tT322 Il Is t,313635 �3�3231 •1 '25i21 ��21 a ��8a m w kk�dot r+ ' JI„, I ' 'r�I. 'r ,1. '9'' h'� I I I I IrT,4 lir-,'}'42__-• 'I' 0- i IN�y',ilAtC7 pfl, .;a 1^onl, l It ,l ,, , GENMALOT.DOC V ` : ln,;n WAX:r:=x;, f , 1 r n•1s •-f{ --- . 4.e.:., ty 0,,,i Ala f 1 ': ' PENDING APPLICATION .• PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTSILUA-96-038,SA,ECF I r DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Leilzke Architects,seeks approval to construct a 106 and • apartment complex on a 7.57 acre site.The project includes seven buildings containing 10 to 20 dwelling units each and �, - a recreation building. GENERAL LOCATION: Rainier Avenue South&South 119th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit _Preliminary Plat _Short Plat Conditional Use Permit _Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review - Shoreline Conditional Use _Other • Permit Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial _Other -Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton.City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Puplic Hearings,during Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative site plan approval.Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last dale of applicant's'Notice of Application'publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application,or If you wish to be.made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations,appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s)for this project,please contact the Development Services Division at235.2550. . • J i�;"rmla� 4 a1 JiO - O ri 6.0a8 Va..tataf01' i 'F4Ifj t.'r''i I," \-1.'- S. //77H Rablem44T7ppz, stNYLF Pv.t, a15•5 =,�ii�!"L.c (V'7i."601..p'� ;474J i E!,•.11.-P:r` ri.*t°3 11- _ '.�i. D S / Sr . ' artr A 9. Y I��::�V -may .. ,, rnok art > , vT�� r tiT?iTil g /IOrN ,5r r} - - tv �< SPsrei . I.�•�i l�f'"� �'ry �i�y; uJ� F.P ai PC4;':rim°0z41J-1,.1'.4sTr.( .,. J IPLEASE INCLUDE'THE'PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE"IDENTIFICATION.; .' l CERTIFICATION I I, S YldI' ,)(.A,(i CYl , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were postediby me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on Signed: t,l/H1,, ( ,IA,t(/1n'1 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that sA-rra, , -'/are• -K -y, ' signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free d voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: ` (��n,.Q l ) I '(O ..>,,-- r a . - - Notary Public and for the State o shington % I/O yl— /,-/ C,v •5'4 — a-v—, r Notary (Print) ,4-fi ,v evAc --c• T �+ 13 •...' ,. My appointment expire 4- ...q-.gq -NOTARY.DOG` • 1 ,_ ' . NO . . ,. 7 f 1 (I 1 i Imilo,....,,,, _.7" • PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS/LUA-96-038,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Leitzke Architects, seeks approval to construct a 106 unit apartment complex on a 7.57 acre site. The project includes seven buildings containing 10 to 20 dwelling units each and a recreation building. GENERAL LOCATION: Rainier Avenue South&South 119th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat Conditional Use Permit Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use Other Permit Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's"Notice of Application" publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. i S //TTH ST zh7 rlLi �9 s_____: .1 s a•7 pp oiii2lJIQ 1fLI • _fzil_ - - - f fi iCii �i b•.n m. 9e• '. - II itiSN i, Ua Ii•C: I� o,'.J!:_t- I x VA 0 "1fl11z :i _ �6,-.1 -R'°r/i .,• '� '147 VaG MF'—e . :C�C s,h i1'•a;.: 3 . i 19 I'l• -- f''7 3�• ei 1.. $lb, 9. r - `O.1s°1=IA D - JJ, a•1 • ,aq■ �a7,�`<oonanus° a �yl�wr- °n I� I�[zp.1 N 1,`11 , ° / .. 17C 421 201 18 171 :1146i17 � RJ `°IJ Rr''1 !_ '•I ■ �(I(I(»Shhh »il t�.'e•ia ii, !1;[� wV•lll �!,J�i',pli ,Ij- •� y '.��il •• :, •s 6 Q , le . d.Ipt its Q �vo 19y II Is�N�fs mi' o 'III it;9.4.= ,' D //9r _mil._ ' '1-r`L r: Z 1';nI I ,I v•;. :, ST ti ,.• CIS'o s TYi' 'IL"'l� 73 a 69,M s m rA ■' ,7a , i ii f_n.p ,. , '• ' N %�EICA-rgr_ 73 o I 'I 'D r��WV 1 oilgit al WI�� ttt /�� rJ LIU19d J; 2� IL,..i son^+1;701�' I I. it3�T-e l •:T" s.' '.s` 1, 1 �x:r s� '1I' Ili 0 .In �Gyp CO Ion .6 IN u tl tl % 'v': '2 n wyls, ,,. I I ,'H� j I y 'Ez.-L. it I{',}RZ 'Of', ily Il S. /20TH '`°--'.`'I:.'I'L yl�+`.c°Gum J = v 1, Ilm —1 RS„ Gov1.,ot, 0,z,1 — — I'm ' 6 s ¢ a 5 e7s llo a al, I,,�•1.p;�1 14'a ' 'a � [y : 'y1'pS,CfPS I "uor J sJnnRovlcN I ,41 y)V 1I1�¢3A,:i:JS ' "_6u',.-...sz11 � .li/.c r,.e •I 41lill\,,•, 1p .•.. la 23C 5 �O-'p fir' _ _ _ . E nl m7", 7e'i'm.'say �;_ — ;;C: r- I1,v.19.76�sl1I 14 , - uiqJ l RYOr J aJ,1PM10VICN ,■OAc 1I�'P. �,: �, S /z/ST .,sr b <sya -7 np2�i,N 1'i la I.I(s. 1.,1 I ;IL._ �.,ti.„.._pt.a_=tiC_1___:;_-t--i-I Mp-2t1r'� 'a\ 7a ops nl7ifss ?3:3 1 e i'T. "S /2/ST •. ° SF Ai � :•I'.I. . .f..my.i, 1.1 � ,,:�� ...^r_--, "F,:,p �.,=n °i d-I!. 1 f r,1 ',; .. =:A..LFASE INCLURE>TH :......JECT;NU . ....1NIiEN::CALLING.:.F.OR PROPER::.....1QENTIFIC. :;:>:«<»:: CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 27, 1996 Mr. Steve Leitzke The Leitzke Architects 6102- 142nd Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98006 SUBJECT: Renton Crown Apartments Project No. LUA-96-038,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Leitzke: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has formally accepted the above-referenced application for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on April 23, 1996. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application for environmental review. Please contact me, at 277-5586, if you have any questions. _ Sincerely, Mark R. P ,AICP Project M ager cc: . • Kohl Excavating, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan/Owners • ACCPTLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF ENTOI ',.!''F.M1b0.afig!.:t::40:•ft500510i .1:7d1::•:g.:Vilt,.. PCY#100mtNt.:!00Yt "419A10s11..ji!liVAPiiiffiV;Z:Wi•!.';:;:.itii.A.RI:t1:?:;,::2:1:ii-ii::miii...)i.is ....... ASTER •APPLIil ; . • ;:.:) .;. :• '; . . Note lIel'e Is more*hah One IeaI owner please ettaoI an odditIo & . .5. . . . . EXISTING LAND USE(S): •• • • •-•'• • i .• • • • NAME: Kohl Excavating, Inc Employees Pension Plan Currently vacant SPE Scl-ie01.)Ls °A' ATTAo0 PROPOSED LAND USES: ADDRESS: 3330 East Valley Road Multi-Family residential/ mid-income CITY: Renton 98055 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-251-8820 Center Sub-Urban & Single Family Res. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: • 0 N TAQTME Rt ON tA PP LI CANT'• • ••c• <!:: .......... • .•• •. . • :• Center Sub-Urban & Single Family Res. NAME: The Leitzke Architects /Steve Leitzke EXISTING ZONING: ADDRESS: 6102 142nd Ave. S.E. Arterial Commercial & R-8 Single Family PROPOSED ZONING: CITY: ZIP: N.A. Bellevue 98006 SITE AREA(SQ.FT. OR ACREAGE): TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-747-0414 .7.57 Acres .i;. PROJECT VALUE: $4,500,000 PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Renton Crown Apartments IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: No Rainier Ave. S. & S. 119th Street IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Steep slope/ protect,.gaw tielt See attached Schedule B 2 rj 1996 • - -•v,f0-1-PLANNING cm/OF RENTON • CRIPTION::OF:PROPERTY:..(Attach °separate sheet.i :necessary) < %: : • See Attached Legal Description :: :. .:::::: . .::. :: . :< •F:APPLIC/�TfON.:8.i E 5... . . . . .. .«::..:::.,: . - .:".: heck:;: Il;a licat(v.n<:t es:;that:a ly _.Clty.:staff>wdl;determine::fees <;> : :> <>' >: — ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ REZONE $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ — SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: • ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ • _VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: I — PRELIMINARY WAIVER $ FINAL — WETLAND PERMIT $ —ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN $' S_HORELINE REVIEWS: _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ _EXEMPTION SNo Charge _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ : . ... .. : . .,.;. :.�.: T�`O ;O:W FIDAVIF: .IV.ERSHIP: ':>.. ;:;::.:.. .::: ;,.' <;:'�' > '<`::� . : I,(Print Name) fv fe° Sj7/{IJJ5b declare that I am(please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application, ,the authorized representative to.act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. �r /� FF�� n ('� ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me,s Notary Public,in and rX.E�t9 O �J, �' l-�' �� for the State of IM'�Sk• residing at-rt,� (Name o Owner/ presentative) .,ni' , on the l 1 day of (, i ,---A, , i Atvaze-- _., ,-8....-.,-L.-- 0 C) -(/ '--- ignature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of No ublic) • .: . . ..:�..:... .: . :.:...: "°�: Cif 'S:�affl.:: <: .:.-.:: :.;�`.': .; .=� '<'. > '; ;`�:«:>'<: <:<.; >_:><<.> :€c:':(��iis:section'to:!?erc�ompletedby:. , y„ , .,, ...::.. .Clt :.Flte�Number,;:.:; . . _��•�::�:::....:..:.. . : ...ECF.:...SA...:R;::SHP:.,L;:=;::.Cl)..;.:;LLA >�'P;:. FP:: .:.:.:::•.:�.:..:.;.>:.:;::.::.:::;:;.:::::::<.;.. ::.;,,.:>...:.::<.:;. :.... . . .... . :.,;:.:.......:. .;.. ..;: ..:.. .., .;..:..::::.:.A.AD,...:W.:::::FP.U.D.:. SM . .S.ME:.:..—'''':;:;: :S,:014 A:.;>:<CPA . :.:..:.:.:... ::<:::: 'f. TAL':RQSIAGE':pRO:VID.ED <:5<:<;> : ;::;:< > `` : >`>'' >s[< _> <t . . . . .................:..: REVISED 2/95 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 320 108TH AVENUE N.E. SCHEDULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: December 22, 1995 at 8:00 A.M. DELORES KOHL and IVAN CHRISTIANSON, as Trustees for KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PROFIT SHARING PLAN and KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN, as to Parcel A; DELORES KOHL and IVAN CHRISTIANSON, an Trustees for KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN, a Parcel B; IVAN F. CHRISTIANSON, WHO ACQUIRED TITLE AS IVAN C. CHRISTIANSON, and DELORES T. KOHL CHRISTIANSON, HUSBAND AND WIFE, as to Parcel C, and DELORES KOHL and IVAN CHRISTIANSON, as Trustees for KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PROFIT SHARING PLAN and KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN, as to Parcel D SCHEDULE B - KING'COUNTY TAX ASSESSORS # 118000-3070-09 (Covers Parcel A) 118000-3915-08 (Covers Parcel B) 118000-3935-04 . (Covers Parcel C and other property) 118000-3855-00 (Covers Lots 9 through 20 In Block 35 and Lots 12 through 24 In Block 40,together with vacated streets and alleys in Parcel D) 118000-3965-07 (Covers Lots 7 and a in Block 36,together with vacated streets in Parcel D) 118000-3975-05 (Covers Lots 9 through 17 in Block 36,together with vacated streets adjoining in Parcel D) 118000-4100-01 (Covers Lots I through 21 in Block 39,together with vacated streets adjoining-in Parcel D) • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: • LOTS 13, 14, 15 AND 16 IN BLOCK 30 OF BRYN MAWR, A5 PER FLAT RECORDED IN VOLUNE 5 OF PLATS,PAGE 58,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; • TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH 1/2 OF VACATED STREET ADJOINING ON THE SOUTH AND WEST 1/2 OF VACATED STREET ADJOINING LOT 16; • • SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON. ' PARCEL B: LOTS 21 THROUGH 24 IN BLOCK 35 OF BRYN MAWR, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS,PAGE 58,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED STREET AND VACATED ALLEY ADJOINING WHICH, UPON VACATION,ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF'WASHINGTON. PARCEL C: LOTS 1, 2, 3,4, 5 AND 6 IN BLOCK 36 OF BRYN MAWR, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF FLATS,PAGE 58,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE VACATED PORTION OF LAKE AVENUE (NOW RAINIER AVENUE) LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOTS PRODUCED EAST AND BETWEEN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY No.5; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL D: LOTS 9 TO 20, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 35; LOTS 7 TO 17, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 36; ALL OF BLOCK 39; AND • LOTS 12 TO 24, INCLUSIVE,IN BLOCK 40; ALL IN BRYN MAWR,AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 58, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF VACATED STREETS AND ALLEYS ADJOINING WHICH, UPON,VACATION,ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 TO 8 INCLUSIVE IN SAID BLOCK 39 CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR STATE HIGHWAY NO. 5 BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3108767; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON. S � ,:•.%},..i::T:•..•J}:.:'.{:..}.:•Y:::.:{w•v•.:J. i::};. ....: ..T}:.':}... .y... •;�..,;. •:•.::•..,,{ .: :iiir..:n:•y: Y:ti:i•v: ...:.: .......... ..:... ....... ..:{.:.i:•. EirC k'i'r:•ir•y il.}:$Y.$fi:`f.} ::YaY.•v5 r:.:;;:ty Y�'• • t:. . S:{ v 4 %lu :{n .....•..•. .. .:.. n.r+.:}. }•.::.{.. .. ..:::v:it..:v::'.v::.:.:: Y.{.:.,:}.i .., .......... ... .. .,.. ......... . f.. : r . . .. .CI'TYY:OF: . lV'T'.ON :> >�f':� :� ;��:%' ...: :,.. :.}.... ...:ir :..a ..}; •.}. .>,..:•:.:... .. .: .. .. .:.,.r.Y.::.:..... ;..:r:: .:r•. :.. ...., k:; •:Y:3;:?:•:�;,'.;%%r:.::..;•�:SS'%'! :.DEV�EOPM.E T SERVICESDIVIS I�:: ft� `�>> :M1i:: t:• ;Si k t+4` •k: S.YS� SSlri f• $i: ..{ ;:�j: ,.r :i: rrtlY::�.•'� <E Sj:' :' .. . ...IVI ASTER::A•PP • I : :.:?'• : ::. , ,: ... .: . .:,.: :.. ... {...:...:. r}....::.:... . ... ... . . .t 1, O$N '• •# � ��.�: :.Y • • Y•.:::::>:;{:{>{.':.::. r}: • ..<<..}.':• .t:.ni.r ...:;}C.,;v;•'•. • .r{.. ....: .>.••;r .: +•:::... .....f• •:...r.:... fY... :s: .... .,.: ,.; • # <'s':••':';.y S;: ';f7e 'S . ...r.... •::{::$'}:.. :.:;+n:.t>. .. .. • ::• • •:.C• .:•{i ::Sir • • • .:,.:.r... .;..•,...y.v:f::•t•...-.f...•............:..: .....:•:.... • . .. ... . . :.•. . •'.': .. ... E :i::'.. r... . , ...1;,: E";>". }:.:- {:i;{;<!•; . t t r •.. ,r:+' •• .: 'f.:. :: .. : }:' :}:.R{{ :' �•t••••.ffY-fit$. °•:<:.:•i;.<.O;1NN RCS}:°r, :":::} 46..\:4 JECT> NFORMATlP.N contc . J. .; 5 : Note ;1f;Itie gi`•tswmorA:ifFisij o+ne Ia aI n�ner,`plea'se attach an:`addiiioli�I: lotantec)`NIat9i:flppl(Cetgn,fd� : . EXISTING LAND USES): • NAME:Kohl Excavating, Inc. Emp. Profit Sharing Plan Currently vacant sss Sc1-1VE OL1r 'A.I ATl'A P 0 PROPOSED LAND USES: ADDRESS: 3330 East Valley Road • • Multi-Family residential! mid-income • CITY' Renton ZIP: 98055 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-251-8820 • Center Sub-Urban & Single Family Res. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ':t ONTA. Tz':P.ERSON/APPLICANT • <: : Center Sub-Urban & Single Family Res. NAME: The Leitzke Architects /Steve Leitzke EXISTING ZONING: Arterial Commercial & R-8 Single Family ADDRESS: 6102 142nd Ave. S.E. • PROPOSED ZONING: N.A. CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98006 SITE AREA(SQ.FT. OR ACREAGE): TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-747-0414 7.57 Acres :;.. ........:.}:,.:.:.}.:.::.%::..:;. PROJECTVALUE: P:RO:JCT:111iF.0tMA7lON.'.: E ::i•: • PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME:• $4,500,000 • Renton Crown Apartments IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: No • Rainier Ave. S. & S. 119th•Street IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Steep slope/ protected GrP See attached Schedule B 2 f� 1996 ..•ELOVivtc�i • PL4PlPlIP.G -rI Y OF RENTON • r e::sh� t ff n .cepsar `.;;:: •• ••;.•'LEGA DESCRIPTION :OF..PROPERTY>.(A• ttaphsepa..at .,., e Yl ..... .. . a . . .. See Attached Legal Description • is•:'•..;.:: '::: .: :.: ;..�..••y::.:n.:{::::::i.::f":::.�:.:::.::�•.�::::. ::'... .:..... ::>.::":.::�:.:.:;::::;: .h k:<. Il::a I)ca ton•:t .... etermine.:::.fees: :>'': ..:;< :< ;� :<.� > ::..:,.::::;:::�:;;::::.:;:::::.:::;C...ec.:•;a ....PP. '.'.t .:. .. YR.... . . . .. pp.Y .. tY . :,. . ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT S REZONE $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ SPECIAL PERMIT S SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT S CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ x_GRADE & FILL PERMIT S (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE — $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ _ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _BINDING SITE PLAN $' SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ VARIANCE _ $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ AFFIDAVIT;OF:;`OW:NERSHIR..>:< €::< ': .;':;;:': : :'' ` : : ' €i ..... ................ ........ I,(Print Name)y(/ rtI7e6i'1/ eclare that I am(please check one) the owner of the property involved in this application,Kthe authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. n n / ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and - Z . • (J�t/ �A td& for he State of j'(..,. on at (Name of Owner/ epresentative) t" , on the ( I day of n^crrt4 199 C Signature of Owner/Representative) _ (Signature •t.otary Public) : ..• „ .. ...:.....:.. . ��..::...:..:....... �. ..:. : ....,.{�hls:.section:to.be...co,mpleted.by.:C,ty.;Ufa. �) ...;�:.. . .... :.:• :...:>.. ...:.:• Clt ;sFrle?Number:::::» ;:.:.;:.::<;.:::::.:;:..::..::.:::::..;• ECF..;` S:Q; s:R<sSHP::,L°.>::::C ::> LL:y ;:<PP:.: ><.F.P:°`;TP::?<`SP; RYI'd(.P`<:%sV<' € '<`: ><:<.> ..... .... ....::..:..... ....:.:.�.::.: . .. . : ::W��:.��. �''SN1::,.:..ME:::;NIFIP: >�:�:S.P,.:<`A•:�:`CPA:'.::;:>:.:>::::;:"<a',>:::�'<.°;.:::;::;:>::.;::<::<::;::;:;:>: ::;':�:«:;:�;'>:�: ............ ......::...:... :'r.bTAL�:�EE�S:z<.5 �.;>: >'':. _'€: >' .. �''CpTAL'::a?OST`AGE"PROVID�EI�•c` $:><�<::>:`. �'>.>. '<>>><''> `.:' <:'.`<'>' .><`'``:2><: REVISED 2/95 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 320 108TH AVENUE N.E. SCHEDULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: December 22, 1995 at 8:00 A.M. DELORES KOHL and IVAN CHRISTIANSON, as Trustees for KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PROFIT SHARING PLAN and KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN, as to Parcel A; DELORES KOHL and IVAN CHRISTIANSON, an Trustees for KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN, a Parcel B; IVAN F. CHRISTIANSON, WHO ACQUIRED TITLE AS IVAN C. CHRISTIANSON, and DELORES T. KOHL CHRISTIANSON, HUSBAND AND WIFE, as to Parcel C, and DELORES KOHL and IVAN CHRISTIANSON, as Trustees for KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PROFIT SHARING PLAN and KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN, as to Parcel D Y SCHEDULE B - KING'COUNTY TAX ASSESSORS# 118000-3070-09 (Covers Parcel A) • 118000-3915-08 (Covers Parcel 5) 115000-3935-04 (Covers Parcel C and other property) 118000-3855-00 (Covers Lots 9 through 20 in Block 35 and Lots 12 through 24 In block 40,together with vacated streets and alleys in Parcel D) 115000-3965-07 (Covers Lots 7 and a In block 36,together with vacated streets in Parcel D) 115000-3975-05 (Covers Lots 9 through 17 in block 36,together with vacated streets adjoining in Parcel D) 118000-4100-01 (Covers Lots I through 21 in block 39,together with vacated streets adjoining-in Parcel D) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: • LOTS 13, 14, 15 AND 16 IN BLOCK 30 OF BRYN MAWR, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUNE 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 58,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH 1/2 OF VACATED STREET ADJOINING ON THE SOUTH AND WEST 1/2 OF 4 VACATED STREET ADJOINING LOT 16; • { SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON. ' PARCEL B: LOTS 21 THROUGH 24 IN BLOCK 35 OF BRYN MAWR, AS PER FLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS,PAGE 58, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED STREET AND VACATED ALLEY ADJOINING WHICH, UPON VACATION,ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF'WASHINGTON. PARCEL C: LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 IN BLOCK 36 OF BRYN MAWR, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF FLATS,PAGE 58,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE VACATED PORTION OF LAKE AVENUE (NOW RAINIER AVENUE) LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOTS PRODUCED EAST AND BETWEEN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY No.5; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL D: LOTS 9 TO 20, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 35; LOTS 7 TO 17, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 36; ALL OF BLOCK 39; AND • LOTS 12 TO 24, INCLUSIVE,IN BLOCK 40; • ALL IN BRYN MAWR,AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 58, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF VACATED STREETS AND ALLEYS ADJOINING WHICH, UPON,VACATION,ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 TO 8 INCLUSIVE IN SAID BLOCK 39 CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR STATE HIGHWAY NO. 5 BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3108767; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON. t. ..}:2.{5•r:•Ji^::{.:.,.... . ::..a...•r:<Y•::::.•;' :.,'1:;:•;•.•{ ..y,:{.- •••.,'.::2:r.• ::J2:YY:f;:W:::.::..::...},• {..L.:.f:..r vi:.N 1• ..•..t.nv•...;..:•::••.S.v.:t••. ...}{::' .. .. .r- .. :, :%S.,: :.:.,}E.Y .. ........+.}/.. .. .. .. \{}: ...r.•:: }•,.,.; . ... :... :. .. r::t:i::', i::4-: ..{i$-}N.. }.{•...vi;:::i.i:: • :'2:f)iL{.:i:. 2fi{.2r ...•.:.::..:+...:•.::...:r;r..,[':.22: ::Y+•;)•:••:t� : , .• ., , •.:.:..:n`:•:..:::. : ...;i N ,. !. i y:{Y:: ..{.:•:r. :zf'i:.:::*:•YfJ:.a•;•.a:`i`?: .:{.:•:•f•. ' ii+4 { .n:..n;•.{:r.s.:{....:�.••. •:•,tff' .}::• ••[5:.,Zi.::'::•.:.:....y:.;;..,, ,. ...; :..•:...... :r.2r:: :,•••.:••.::C.:::�::r::.;::• CITYv. ENT' N ;24: ER..r .a... i<..:;iv--."fi:: •:t tii?.. .. ,,.., ...{..:v t..:..Ji::•:i•. a ..::.: ' ..;:::2::•:}:.•.:".4:5: ;>E.t:,};iY ;t,::}:::':in{ ,:.•::.., :..j : .. t: :.:::.i{riy:,:•Y+:n:;+:ini:..:v;Y•ury ••y;.;fi• ;yY S;: Y.r'��-'.�fS'r?:y ..,v,:,.. ry •.....} L::C•..•:.:?Si ..::'•: 2�:';.;2 ..::n. ... :. . .. {:;..,} :},.;:r:{}.r r.:f�i...':.•.� ':'>.:. .i r;..,. : i:: 't}::{i;:•`#::<].':Si:'i.:..♦:;..f].::a• Yn.+.:.rSt:2,32 :.: .:.+f ... .. :DEUELOPMNT SERVICES e:... : ON :?�'.L2)::;•:; •'} '.•" '.' / • .{•. ^. r.., }• �'}fin k :^fi r�ik • .. }... .:. : .:. .. ♦ .. :. •..... ,.., . :.:a .: �:•.,.• ,..;..:•. .. •..<Y:�}'l .i'sii25ivi: •n: } .} , :'.,..;.. ••1.:::: :..i: 4:..•.:..,•ri}Y.•S:i2..., :.y}•:'.::v, : ..t:: .t. :it 2.: :i?,2c. 1;..i•'�• . •:i•:ir:,. r: .:,..:.... . :.:.: .t;{t.., .y::{}:::•.:?•: , :::i�.'. : •'.• .... .ij.i i:f•; };:5 • r}}:.,;:�,. ., r/•.,..::.+t;.;::;: yr: ...:.:.t2:} f•t••..;rf}"ri .. ,:, ::.t,...;::5 n••]: :,U:W N 4t$Y4.... • ; . f ote f,}')iete:.is:morA''tNah tine:Im ei'o ner lea'se'attach:an%edd(tlo fir: .:;f Fr:f Milan ,1.4 r: f JS' /....... -r'. S •<• . OJECT�fNFORM ;# .,.;,; (iotati ei)?Masster A{ipIi atior for eec'h;owner...?:;.• }.'.:..,•,'.' • EXISTING LAND USE(S): CD VreCOOT 9 I?.(, bIs NAME: Mark Lundberg/Re.,JTON C+ROVN 3. , , Currently vacant SCs SCHSfULF_ 'A' 'A"I"rACINEO ADDRESS: 704 N.E. Northlake PROPOSED LAND USES: • Multi-Family residential/ mid-income • CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98105 • EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-5474162 Center Sub-Urban & Single Family Res. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: •.v":::'.."CONTA:GPP.ER'SON/APPLICANT:' [}.:i;::;:.::..... . ....:,....}::...{..::..::..:....:.:... ... ::. :...: :.. .. . Center Sub-Urban & Single Family Res. NAME: The Leitzke Architects /Steve Leitzke EXISTING ZONING: ADDRESS: 6102 142nd Ave. S.E. Arterial Commercial & R-8 Single Family • PROPOSED ZONING: • N.A. CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98006 SITE AREA(SQ.FT. OR ACREAGE): • • TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-747-0414 7.57 Acres :; . ...•:.:,.+.::....::.i.'•;::{.:}.:.. .. .. ..•. PROJECTVALUE: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: $4,500,000 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? • Renton Crown Apartments • PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESSIS)/LOCATION: No Rainier Ave. S. & S. 119th Street IS THESENSITIVE SITEAREA?LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Steep slope/ proteCte r = See attached Schedule B 1996 (�EVF�CWMEN r PLANNING CITY OF R . UB° • ::LEGAf_:>DES. RO CRIPTION;:OF::PPERTY::.(Attach para sete sheet:if:necessary)';< < ? : ::;<:; See Attached Legal Description .:.. . .....:...' :..: .::... .. .....:..• .' ' SEES :. ....:.:. ..,,,: . . .,.�TYPEF;APPLICpiT(ON & . •':..:.:...•.:::..' .::`::::'.ice:.. . .•. .:::::• :••..::: .:.;.::.: :;.;:.:>:.:..>: ' es::that:a I � .Cl :staff>>will';;iletermine::fees;::>: '::;€_ >. <;:?. :'°::':' ; .�::.:;: ;::>:::::<;.>�::::; ::>:;:::Ch.eck;all..applr.caflo..n.t.Y.p : . . ...:.. pP:Y...: .tY . :...... ..:...... . . .., .. . .: . .. _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _REZONE $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _SPECIAL PERMIT $ _SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ x-GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ • }(NO. CU. YDS: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ —VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY — WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ _ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _BINDING SITE PLAN $' SHORELINE REVIEWS: _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _CONDITIONAL USE S _VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge ^ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ ::;::::::':::: :::€ €'::;;.. . ::. : .:°>;': :;: AF•FIDAVIT OFQW>NERS:.. ..... . . I,(Print Nama?/'!/r�� `1" """ 7 declare that I am(please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application the authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the'nf ir ation h rewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ATTEST: Subscribed end worn to before me, a Notary Public,in and for the State of(�,atltn, residing at,r,� (Name of Owner/R • e ' , on the I I day of �ar-Gr� 19 qtr. (Signature of Owner/Representative) C) (Signature otary Public) : :: . : ::<:;:: :.:. . : ;:....:.' :.... . ....: ::';: '• o: ;: •om eted b :;Clt .r.Staff:}::.::: :...: � : : < ;` <:;' > > < ::• . ... .• ..;..,(This.;sectio•nt;, be c:';'.:p�:.:.... .' .::Y:•:.....,Y..;::.>::..::..... .....,.. ......::..Clt ;:Flle::NurnberL<::»::'';':'::::......................................... :::.:.::..::.:.. <.:::;�� ;cECF..:";'.S:A:; :<:SHPL;>:::C(�:>:•L�'A>>><!?P ><.F.P':��TP:: 'SP;��RV:M'P: ;<;V�`:?<� `:�`:< ??;��< • :...:.::..:.:... .. � �1N��>� : ..� B:S:P��i'A<>'CPAr :> ":'• ':> . < <<:';�«;:: :>i'>< >�>< <' : ..:.:>'.:.:•..;':.:.,..;..:'..;'.::':::'.;;..,.::....::...<.:....:..:.1A.AD;:r::. .FPU.D :�`SM:"�''S.f1llE::>=NiHP:>> .. ... .....::. . . . : ::>:.:..:... ... ...... .. ... .:.:::.::�':.T..•TAL'::R05TAG.E��pfO-UID'gD :<$>:;. .:....:.:.::.: REVISED 2/95 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 320 108TH AVENUE N.E. SCHEDULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: December 22, 1995 at 8:00 A.M. DELORES KOHL and IVAN CHRISTIANSON, as Trustees for KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PROFIT SHARING PLAN and KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN, as to Parcel A; DELORES KOHL and IVAN CHRISTIANSON, an Trustees for KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN, a Parcel B; IVAN F. CHRISTIANSON, WHO ACQUIRED TITLE AS IVAN C. CHRISTIANSON, and DELORES T. KOHL CHRISTIANSON, HUSBAND AND WIFE, as to Parcel C, and DELORES KOHL and IVAN CHRISTIANSON, as Trustees for KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PROFIT SHARING PLAN and KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN, as to Parcel D SCHEDULE B - KING'COUNTY TAX ASSESSORS # 118000-3070-09 (Covers Parcel A) 118000-3915-08 (Covers Parcel B) 118000-3935-04 . (Covers Parcel C and other property) 118000-3855-00 (Covers Lots 9 through 20 in block 35 and Lots 12 through 24 In Block 40,together with vacated streets and alleys in Parcel D) • 118000-3965-07 (Covers Lots 7 and a In Block 36,together with vacated streets In Parcel D) 118000-3975-05 (Covers Lots 9 through 17 in Block 36,together with vacated streets adjoining in Parcel D) 118000-4100-01 (Covers Lots I through 21 in block 39,together with vacated streets adjoining-in Parcel D) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: • LOTS 13, 14, 15 AND 16 IN BLOCK 30 OF BRYN MAWR, A5 PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUNE 5 OF PLATS,PAGE 58, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH 1/2 OF VACATED STREET ADJOINING ON THE SOUTH AND WEST 1/2 OF VACATED STREET ADJOINING LOT 16; • SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: LOTS 21 THROUGH 24 IN BLOCK 35 OF BRYN MAWR, A5 PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS,PAGE 58, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; • TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED STREET AND VACATED ALLEY ADJOINING WHICH, UPON VACATION,ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF'WASHINGTON. PARCEL C: LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 IN BLOCK 36 OF BRYN MAWR, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF FLATS, PAGE 58, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE VACATED PORTION OF LAKE AVENUE (NOW RAINIER AVENUE) LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOTS PRODUCED EAST AND BETWEEN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY No.5; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL D: LOTS 9 TO 20, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 35; LOTS 7 TO 17, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 36; ALL OF BLOCK 39; AND • LOTS 12 TO 24, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 40; ALL IN BRYN MAWR,AS PER FLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF FLATS, PAGE 58, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; • TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF VACATED STREETS AND ALLEYS ADJOINING WHICH, UPON,VACATION,ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 TO 8 INCLUSIVE IN SAID BLOCK 39 CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR STATE HIGHWAY NO. 5 BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3108767; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON. • .:::. .••v.:•v:., .•r.....•;• 'k:if{F:+.Y%k!/.•S:!.].is y::F:::'::''{."i Y••. .::{:::u:F}.}:v ,FF:Ci-..:: ♦ :r:-i:.:..F:::.♦k':.:•?: ": ..}:•.. }i:j::k:F i}..r:.•:iy}{`}{.:..: .. ,•:.,.. ....r iliiia... ..... ../{.r... ,,.tr .... .. .4 ... ... .::.:.. .. ...:•••.•,.f'„• t.•`••::}'?%:;:•• Sj::.<'y:::?::.r 'tf tf. • . .....:............... ......r nr..r .. .:. ..:.}.:. ...tr ......:.:.....:•..•:. ./ v .v.}k}SS.t3.::}•.:,}r:'::.5}:::Fi.F:.::}i:5'#iiiF. :'+':-: tft'C:?;: }':' ::;':FSF::i.;i.....tiC.•F}:} ':'•:!Mt }:...• ..:: ..;}:: :.:P:..:fl;l•:ri%•.:}>:;�: t:,.:..:.,;:::::.:...:}..<.. ..::r.:.•t.....:......r:.::$:.5:r?..}. ....,.,.t.:t?. :.:pE1/f=�O.RME •� : ::.; ...<... >`s>i<:;; ..:.:>.... �,i.,.....,....:.):..:,:. .:,,�.:..:..:.,....:.....,..:,;:?} •F:t F • ./•t • ti: �. •• :u :t:vn ::.; U.i;u:• r.:ti tJ y.,;. j:i: • ry. ':::AP }•F #f. ;f. . .. .. . . ..... .. ..: . �l'III�i��.T:E`R�.A�1?P �•.I••G� �= ��i.•� r •SC y.. <#. ? i. .i.4iv Y • • • .� :i • •• PR ECT<{NF•... .. .. . .. ,J: Q ORIVIA� .% ION>�c•� n Note#;••l1;;heYe;Is:mor6 than One legal owner please attach an eddiilop4l: •':., . .` EXISTING LAND USE(S): notanted Ma§t9r,:A'ppliCefion;for;eeah, "vJner. • NAME: 'Kohl Excavating, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan Currently vacant Ste SGHe r)01...1_ J ATTA o 1-1 Eta • PROPOSED LAND USES: ADDRESS: 3330 East Valley Road Multi-Family residential/ mid-income CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-251-8820 Center Sub-Urban & Single Family Res. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: : : Center Sub-Urban & Single Family Res. NAME: The Leitzke Architects /Steve Leitzke EXISTING ZONING: • ADDRESS: Arterial Commercial & R-8 Single Family 6102 142nd Ave. S.E. PROPOSED ZONING: • N.A. CITY: Bellevue ZIP. 98006 SITE AREA(SQ.FT. OR ACREAGE): TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-747-0414 7.57 Acres • , •` PROJECT PROJECTINFORMATION .: ;:': < • PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: • $4,500,000 Renton Crown Apartments IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? PROPERTY/PROJgCT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: No • Rainier Ave. S. & S. 119th Street IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? Mq� KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Steep slope/ protea: �lt See attached Schedule B 9tvFI_OI'11,41 r PL.0NNI•NG CITY OF HENFOPd . . OPERTY>:° Attach:se .arate.;sh.eet.iif:necessar:y:) ° <`:::' - ' LEG/a:k,DES•CRIP•TION.;:OF:PR.. ..(:.. p........ . ... See Attached Legal Description . :. :. ::.:: :::•:'> : = ':: : . ... .< ;:.: :.•;:<: : . . E: : • PPLICATION::&>:FE.E$:. : : :: :..-. . ;.::.: .:::;;.>•:.::....„:„: :,..::.::: . •:': :: : :.:'':::::. , ;. I staff>wlll:..determine:..fees::::'>'.>:: °=::?>. :`° : _: . . .;: ,,.,....,:>...... ::;>Check:tall applict4o..n t.Y.R:es:that;:applY .=.0 ty.: :,:.:..•.... _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _REZONE $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _SPECIAL PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ — — — TEMPORARY PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT $ _CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ — PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ — VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY WAIVER $ _FINAL ^_WETLAND PERMIT $ _ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $' SHORELINE REVIEWS: _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ —CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ _EXEMPTION SNo Charge ^ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ I,(Print NameLh1.441 C V711AYTUV,declare that I am(please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,(the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and ansvVers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. DnQ ��( () ,f" ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public,in and oi1.t.� �, Tl 1,txt t( `^ for the tote o �,VG�S(+, residing at--� (Name of wner/Repr sentative) f on the I I day of ,."-wu" t Signature of Owner/Representative) CM (Signature o otary Public) ............. •: . .. .:..:;:;::. .:. :< .:...:. .�.• .::: .• :i•.: :. '; :• :: t to ..::'..... ...,;.......;.<.: '.':::.:<;><�>;:: °`':.>::°: ::��::°;.:';•.,;:.::;::,•: ::: .;:.: :... . :•.::'..:;. .. ....:• .. (T.hls.:sectlon,to:be:.completed:.bY:6;:,. . 1......:..EP:: ::;:..::-;:::":•.,:•;:>';:•:-;:.:'•.: ::'>>;. �::><..:.:;:::;'::.: :.:,..:::.:.,..:..:.....: .-: ... ..:::<P.P..�<:<:; P:''.::T.P.:: <SP. :'RVNf1 .:.:;:';;;:.;:.:::.�:.:<..: . •..:.;:r::.Ctt ::FII�::Nutnber..:.:.: . ..,..:..:.,:..,:.:..:.... . ...ECF..--.:-.A,::::R::,SHPL;:;:; U,;..:;LLA..:::...:..•.A:1:: ...: ......... .-. ....wi:...... ....,...:: ;;;.g li,:: :..A.l�D.i>:W:��'FP.G.D° �SIVI :'S.fVIE:�::NIF{P:•><>'Q:S.P<>A`='>CPA`�'�<<<>':;::: ':`< ; : : :> r < ��' :...::::::.:: b:: .li•'P': '... < `€; ' t :::. :: .;,:' :,.:;:::. :,:AL :�: TAGE PROVIDEL�...<$..... . ....._. :::<::,s:;.::::: `rQTAI r1=1 ES...:.$..::>...:........::<.:.::..:::::•......:. .TQTALPQS..... .. ....:..: .:.::...:..:, ...:::.:..:..:<. ....:.::::::.. » '` ' .. ........ REVISED 2/96 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 320 108TH AVENUE N.E. SCHEDULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: December 22, 1995 at 8:00 A.M. DELORES KOHL and IVAN CHRISTIANSON, as Trustees for KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PROFIT SHARING PLAN and KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN, as to Parcel A; DELORES KOHL and IVAN CHRISTIANSON, an Trustees for KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN, a Parcel B; IVAN F. CHRISTIANSON, WHO ACQUIRED TITLE AS IVAN C. CHRISTIANSON, and DELORES T. KOHL CHRISTIANSON, HUSBAND AND WIFE, as to Parcel C, and DELORES KOHL and IVAN CHRISTIANSON, as Trustees for KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PROFIT SHARING PLAN and KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN, as to Parcel D SCHEDULE B - KING'COUNTY TAX ASSESSORS# 118000-3070-09 (Covers Parcel A) 118000-3915-08 (Covers Parcel 5) 118000-3935-04 . (Covers Parcel C and other property) 118000-3855-00 (Covers Lots 9 through 20 in 51ock 35 and Lots 12 through 24 In Block 40,together with vacated streets and alleys in Parcel D) 118000-3965-07 (Covers Lots 7 and a In Block 36,together with vacated streets In Parcel D) 118000-3975-05 (Covers Lots 9 through 17 in Block 36,together with vacated streets adjoining In Parcel D) 118000-410Q-01 (Covers Lots I through 21 in Block 39,together with vacated streets - adjoining-in Parcel D) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: • LOTS 13, 14, 15 AND 16 IN BLOCK 30 OF BRYN MAWR, A5 PER FLAT RECORDED IN VOLUNE 5 OF PLATS,PAGE 58,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH 1/2 OF VACATED STREET ADJOINING ON THE SOUTH AND WEST 1/2 OF VACATED STREET ADJOINING LOT 16; .• • SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON. ' PARCEL B: LOTS 21 THROUGH 24 IN BLOCK 35 OF BRYN MAWR, AS PER FLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF FLATS,PAGE 58,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; • TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED STREET AND VACATED ALLEY ADJOINING WHICH, UPON VACATION,ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF'WASHINGTON. PARCEL C: LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 IN BLOCK 36 OF BRYN MAWR, A5 PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF FLATS, PAGE 58, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE VACATED PORTION OF LAKE AVENUE (NOW RAINIER AVENUE) LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOTS PRODUCED EAST AND BETWEEN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY No.5; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL D: LOTS 9 TO 20, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 35; LOTS 7 TO 17, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 36; ALL OF BLOCK 39; AND • LOTS 12 TO 24, INCLUSIVE,IN BLOCK 40; ALL IN BRYN MAWR,AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF FLATS, PAGE 58, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF VACATED STREETS AND ALLEYS ADJOINING WHICH, UPON,VACATION,ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 TO 8 INCLUSIVE IN SAID BLOCK 39 CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR STATE HIGHWAY NO. 5 BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3108767; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON. • • • ..:.,:: r .t.,..{.....•......:....?r..... r..}......fr.:r..:..r•. ::.,r,...�.,...)+,:,... .... .} .:. .r• ..: rt;: r:'t;,':•.: ..t;r: .. f: .: :i.. .: :...: J.f,.,....v}xf: ..}: •{.••...• .•.:.. •. ...... : }:. r.£ 1/{.,:r„ii.Y.r/•.i {iJ;; '}F!£$%:'rr ♦ 43-+:,: t..:..,.x.:r..: :t.,n...:,.:{y:,:q. Sr..J.. :.. : { • .. .. .};t r....,.,. ` .<..,r{.i �'1.:.+ j;,r,.r .,.., . .,.finis i+$ .... : .: ..t:.;•„ ) ::r .r.,•.3, ..... ?^•.:.. .}.4...: J..:•.{.. ..::.s:, f;,}..:::..•a, .}i..:3 ::<::�<' ?:::%{:, ..t Cr{f.::+.. .,..:.:: � : .: ...:... •.. :.:prr:,.:..:}.•...•.... .. ....}. .. i•/•S .s:j�•:>:,':. i'%s..:.:r::.)<%£i!$.. .............:.. :},:...,.:..<{�?.;{:..,. ..:.. �..::...,.:..:...:.... .;:..Y.,.,:: . ... .CITYY:O . NT.ON{5:•I{.:::>:;k::£ :.. ;•:,• :r.Y.::' €> ...:;.::,... .,/,. ..3$':r,:x:.Y:i1:. .:}....{.,.{,:,r, .., .•...::•:. ;:3`•:: :•'.:: : .. :ii r• .i y.:, ::i•$::, : :.: ., :i$:.{:: :•DEVEf.O.PM.ENT SERVICES DIVtS N:#"i>:< ' " �'�•' � l.0 ..r:.Y,:} r::,:.....!,Y.w:.}:.... .?..:{•:':.:.:} £},:..,..,..:,...t .. ....:•:. •.i: • •k;♦ :, Y:r.: :�': t ♦. { .t . ,.. ....r,♦ .... ,..r.f:..• .. , .:• .. ,.. . Y ::.i.:, .•:Y•• r•i}1'•::.:r?i:r.;.:• :,•'• .:•:}.,. .. {., .,...Y.•.:...• :. r..t• ..... . .r.. .... :r •fir. ::5.::.'••:t: .:<: .{:•]'%£:3 .<:. ;}'k:s:<•... .:3...:... }':}. .. t . .r:.. .:.... .: .. a ... $.i.:. •,.r:, •• :t#$':t:•<:.�;.., ,: ,.. ..... .. '••v:rx. +r•:s .:...y.:..; 3:: , ,r,1.•',?:%4�•r.;'Y�{.;. •..3::1?:..ra/••..£': ' { t.. ., }$...:}:3r :.:::3}:::+:'+.; » .: � :4 :r `.i .� ,:J $}#:3> $�J$i. ••; ...r..•: •::{'....:r.i:::Sl rr .. ....r... :.: •• R .v rij ♦,r ::<r::r}. ii3>%}$ S kYy :r, •. t..:•••::•••,:$:{.., J tYs,•+:•••••,}::.:;.,?...:•.:;•Y.:• .•.:: ...t••;;.;.:•.;•....... ..:.. y$:.r.:: is i�i£::t• il., .r:..., : :. ..,:.k:i 2,.:....., ..... .. •:{.:k r.•. :r'..:.'., ,:tit:::: �::�$ • }.:4. . , .,t„•.Y;:..Jrd f...... ..>:: ;. . :...i:.:, ... :. t :' v: • %i,Y •s3 h:.: •.:.:{;';: �'t. .�$ • . 1 :.::r:i:}:}::r•,; n .:}.•'+.St:ii:{i:.':i�{:v'.$..::.r{'.:.:. :•::fir'.: : '. ; .: :{ .:t::.:;O:1NN (S): : . ..<: ::Q .JECT INFOR11A .10. : c• •-- ' : kS ft$} Note;3•s1.f;tI e;Y'is>morA:tfian One legal•owher please attach a....,itiopb(: hots teirroastd.topp)icaton%pr.pachoinlner'r:.:::.• .: .,. •:.•. - EXISTING LAND USE(S): NAME: Delores Kohl & Ivan Christianson Currently vacant SEE Sc4-1t"1:7IJL 'A4' ArrAG 4 P PROPOSED LAND USES: ADDRESS: 3330 East Valley Road Multi-Family residential/mid-income CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 . EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-251-8820 • PROPOSED COCenterMPREHENSIVESub-Urban PLAN MAP DESIG& SingleNATION:Family Res. : .•.,::::::Ri#atiNitACT>'PER'SONIAt P!LICANT:: : . <° . ""' Center Sub-Urban & Single Family Res. NAME: The Leitzke Architects /Steve Leitzke EXISTING ZONING: ' ADDRESS: 6102 142nd Ave. S.E. Arterial Commercial & R-8 Single Family PROPOSED ZONING: • • N.A. CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98006 SITE AREA(SQ.FT. OR ACREAGE): TELEPHONE NUMBER: RECeIVED 206-747-0414 7.57 Acres k ' • PROJECT VALUE: G`�� '::: :: :':: €PR.(JIdlii1i t MA'TION`-: ::: •:•. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: $4,500,000 DEVciryoENTPIANNING. CITY OF ReNTON Renton Crown Apartments IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(SI/LOCATION: No Rainier Ave. S. & S. 119th Street . IS THE SITESENSITIVEAREA?LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Steep slope/ protected Greenbelt See attached Schedule B • • : . ::.: Attach::se arate:sheet if:ne.cessar"1`; <%?:<`- ::.: :.:•.::;.:. [.EGA�:,DEttRIPTION OF.PROPERTY.,.{:. P.....::.. : Y See Attached Legal Description • : :.:: .: >:>. :: : : :.::<.... :;::.:...: -„, ,,.TYPE:<OF:APPLICATION:: •::;FE.ES: ::::. -..•... :.::•; . >;:;..>: >;::�: .:;::.• 1 --.C1 • tffwill:.:'.iletermineJfees;:»..r,..;'><_.„%.. >:::,. • . ....; :;:,,..:.<>:> •:: Check:<:ali<applicax�a..n a.YP.es:;t. at:apP:Y:..;. .tY.: —ANNEXATION $• SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _SPECIAL PERMIT $ _SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ — $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ -x_SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ FINAL PLAT $ X—GRADE & FILL PERMIT • (NO. CU. YDS: ) • PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ —VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) — PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ _ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _CONDITIONAL USE $ —VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $No Char4e ^ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ •....:.:.. : . . .:�.�: `�AFFIDAVIT' OF:=�O>WNERS,N.IR <' ;; > :. ,. :�` des k)ttL• I,(Print flame) Q�ZIST7I}f\J ,declare that lam(please check one) he owner of the property involved in this application,_the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. n „ � ,^ 0 ATtEST: Subscribed and sworn to geforTme,a Notary Public, in and OL( J for the fete of �e-SI+• residin at (Name •' Owner/ epresentative) �.�e.�'i" on the I day of •p .z� . (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of tart' ublic) .. .. , ...:. .:.:.:...... .......:. . :i:(This:~:section::to.be::c•ompfeted>bY:>Cify�S:taffy)��°•: .:.�.: . . •..:• :::::<:.Clt ..Flig::Number.::.:.: . . .:...:...,.:.:.:: .... :�.• . ...ECF.::::.SA .:R;::SF1P.:.L.:;'4U.::...LLq. >�'�';:.:>:F:P::.TP.:..::�.S..:.;::.:;R.:.:.M.P;:.;:...::::::::::.:>.:...:..;. :. . .W:..'> : ;SM ':' 05: `NIHP: .,.,, A CPA::'. :,i, : ::..:,.:?„,c.:` '> <>:< > >> : `:` ':><`` < . :.:. ..:: .. .... ...::..:.:...:..:... :.:'C.OTAL:�EES .......... .. .....:. :..... :.:: ......:. .TQTAL..P. STAG.E:f?RQVIDEO.:..;$:::>::;:.;:;.:•: ;::.;:�..:<:.:.:.><:,.....,...::::...,:::....::<: REVISED 2/95 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 320 108TH AVENUE N.E. SCHEDULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: December 22, 1995 at 8:00 A.M. DELORES KOHL and IVAN CHRISTIANSON, as Trustees for KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PROFIT SHARING PLAN and KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN, as to Parcel A; DELORES KOHL and IVAN CHRISTIANSON, an Trustees for KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN, a Parcel B; IVAN F. CHRISTIANSON, WHO ACQUIRED TITLE AS IVAN C. CHRISTIANSON, and DELORES T. KOHL CHRISTIANSON, HUSBAND AND WIFE, as to Parcel C, and DELORES KOHL and IVAN CHRISTIANSON, as Trustees for KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PROFIT SHARING PLAN and KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN, as to Parcel D SCHEDULE B - KING'COUNTY TAX ASSESSORS # 118000-3070-09 (Covers Parcel A) 118000-3915-08 • (Covers Parcel B) 1 6 118000-3935-04 . (Covers Parcel C and other property) 118000-3855-00 (Covers Lots 9 through 20 in block 35 and Lots 12 through 24 In Block 40,together with vacated streets and alleys in Parcel D) 118000-5965-07 (Covers Lots 7 and a In block 36,together with vacated streets In Parcel D) • 118000-3975-05 (Covers Lots 9 through 17 in block 36,together with vacated streets adjoining in Parcel D) 118000-4100-01 (Covers Lots I through 21 in block 39,together with vacated streets adjoining-in Parcel D) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: • LOTS 13, 14, 15 AND 16 IN BLOCK 30 OF BRYN MAWR, A5 PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUNE 5 OF PLATS,PAGE 58,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; 1 4 TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH 1/2 OF VACATED STREET ADJOINING ON THE SOUTH AND WEST 1/2 OF VACATED STREET ADJOINING LOT 16; .• • SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON. ' PARCEL B: LOTS 21 THROUGH 24 IN BLOCK 35 OF BRYN MAWR, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS,PAGE 58,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; • TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED STREET AND VACATED ALLEY ADJOINING WHICH, UPON VACATION,ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF'WASHINGTON. PARCEL C: LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 IN BLOCK 36 OF BRYN MAWR, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 58, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE VACATED PORTION OF LAKE AVENUE (NOW RAINIER AVENUE) LYING BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOTS PRODUCED EAST AND BETWEEN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY No.5; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL D: • LOTS 9 TO 20, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 35; LOTS 7 TO 17, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 36; ALL OF BLOCK 39; AND • LOTS 12 TO 24, INCLUSIVE,IN BLOCK 40; ALL IN BRYN MAWR,AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 58, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF VACATED STREETS AND ALLEYS ADJOINING WHICH, UPON,VACATION,ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 TO 8 INCLUSIVE IN SAID BLOCK 39 CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR STATE HIGHWAY NO. 5 BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3108767; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON. .t. PROJECT NARRATIVE SIZE AND LOCATION The site area within the boundaries indicated on the Site flan is 329,954 sq.ft. (7.57 acres) in area. The project lies West of Rainier Ave. S. and vacated 120th Street. ' CURRENT USE The site has been extensively excavated and regraded in the past and is currently not used for any purpose. Other than a sidewalk along Rainier Ave.there are no site improvements. SPECIAL SITE FEATURES There is large"Bench" 20-35 feet above Rainier Ave. and a smaller"bench"5-10 feet above Rainier Ave. Between the"benches" is a steep, manmade"cut" slope which will be graded as part of our proposal to a more uniform slope. The purpose of the regrading is to stabilize the slope (existing slope cannot support vegetation), eliminate the hazard that such a slope would pose within the development, and allow for a more gradual and less abrupt transition to the dwellings located to the West. The steep slopes to the West of the proposed development will not be graded in any way as part of this proposal. Existing vegetation will remain and may be enhanced with an orchard hydroseed mix. The portions of the steep slope to the South of the development will be regraded to a maximum slope of 3 horizontal to 1 vertical (See Soils Recommendations) and will receive an orchard hydroseed mix. POTENTIAL VIEW OBSTRUCTION The steep slopes to the South and West have the benefit of buffering the adjacent single family developments. The average top of the existing slopes is at elevation 120' or higher. The floor elevations of the homes at the top of these slopes are not known, but one could assume conservatively that the finish floor elevations would be at least 3'to 5' higher (approx. 124') than the top of the slope. The highest roofline within the proposal (BLDG G) is at approx. elevation 118',two feet below the top of slope and setback at least 150 feet horizontally from the top of the slope and over 200 feet from the nearest house. The rooflines of the remaining buildings within the project are at least 10 feet lower in elevation. Impacts to existing views is negligible. PROPOSED USE The project Renton Crown Apartments includes seven multifamily buildings containing from 10 to 20 units ea. and a recreation building with pool. The buildings identified as Bldgs. D, E, and G have parking below. Exhibit A, attached gives a summary of areas per floor, building, and project totals. The project will consist of 106 one and two bedroom dwelling units of above average quality. RECtivED I' 1g96 PLANNING CIT`s'OF—lRENTON Access will be from Rainier Ave. Due to topographical constraints no other access is possible. Maximum building height proposed is 36 feet,which exceeds the allowable height by 1 foot. We are asking for the additional height in order to allow higher ceilings in the dwelling units (9 feet instead of the usual 8 feet). See attached summary information for parking, lot coverage, etc. END OF NARRATIVE • • • • CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION/PHASING Construction is scheduled to begin in July of 1996 and finish May 1997. The proposal is not phased. Construction hours will be between the hours of 7:00A.M. and 8:001'.M. , Monday thru Saturday per ordinance #3592,12-14-81. Hauling routes will be South on rainier Ave.to 1-405. Water trucks will be utilized during periods of dry weather to minimize impacts from dust during construction. A rock entrance will be provided in order to assist in removing loose soil from trucks leaving the site. Internal drives will be stabilized with structural asphalt (ATB) as soon as possible. This will minimize tracking of mud onto the streets and provide a driving surface with a minimal amount of dust becoming airborne. • Slopes will be stabilized and hydroseeded early in the construction of the Work.' Equipment"shall be properly muffled and maintained in order to meet the requirements of 0rd. #2820. The site currently has minimal vegetation in the area proposed for development, including those areas to be graded. The existing trees and vegetation at the South and West will be left in their natural state. The South slope will be planted with material intended to reduce erosion impacts. See Landscape flan. CODE SEARCH ZONING DATA ZONING JURISDICTION: CITY OF RENTON ZONING DESIGNATION: 4-31-10.4: ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL, AMENDED,;; MAY 1,1995, ORDINANCE 4513. MULTI-FAMILY:' SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE MULTI- FAMILY ZONE, • • COMMUNITY CENTER, (MF-C), SECTION 4-31-8.D OF CHAPTER 31, TITLE IV, OF THE CITY CODE. PROPOSED USE: MULTI-FAMILY APPROVAL PROCESS: SITE FLAN REVIEW, SECTION 4-31-33. DENSITY ALLOWED: 10-20 UNITS PER ACRE DENSITY PROPOSED: <20 UNITS/ACRE HEIGHT LIMIT: 35'-0"/ MAX. THREE STORIES FRONT YARD SETBACK: 20'-0" MIN. SIDE YARD SETBACK: 12'-0" MIN. SIDE YARD SETBACK (TOTAL): 24'-0" MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK: 15'-0" MIN. ACCESSORY BUILDINGS S.B. : 06'-0" MIN. ALLOWED PROJECTIONS INTO S.B. :TWO MAX. PER FACADE LESS THAN 10'WIDE MAY PROJECT NO MORE THAN 24". EAVE PROJECTIONS: MAXIMUM 24" INTO REQUIRED INTERIOR OR STREET SETBACK. SITE AREA: 329,954 sq. ft. (7.57 acres) LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED: 45% BUILDING COVERAGE PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE: 47008 sq. ft. = 14.2% DWELLINGS 16020 sq.ft. =4.9% CARPORTS 19.1% TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE: 75% BLDG. FOOTPRINT, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS IMPERVIOUS SURFACE PROPOSED: 149450 sq. ft. =45.2% PARKING REQUIRED: 1.75/ DU= 186 PARKING PROVIDED: 1.75/ DU=186 (INCL. 0.25/ UNIT GUEST PARK'G) • PARKING BREAKDOWN: GARAGE PARKING = 24 . PARKING W/ CARPORT= 89 STALL SIZE STANDARD: 9'X20' STALL SIZE COMPACT: 81/2'X16' (MAX 30%) LANDSCAPING (INTERIOR PARKING): 5108 sq. ft. LANDSCAPING (ALL OTHER): IRRIGATED LANDSCAPING 48141 sct.ft. HYDROSEEDED SLOPES 86500 scl.ft. BUILDING CODE DATA BUILDING CODE: 1994 UDC OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: ' R-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: TYPE V-N SPRINKLED BUILDING DATA NO. UNITS: 106 UNIT BREAKDOWN: ONE BEDROOM ONE BATH 62 TWO BEDROOM TWO BATH 54 [J41-76-035 -. Rodisi17 ' CR0WN4.DOC BUILDING DATA BUILDING NO. STORIES 1 BR/1 BATH 2 BR/ 1 BATH 2 BR/ 2 BATH FL/BUILDING 713 SF 889 1007 AREA A BASEMENT FL. 2 2014 15T FL. 4 4028 2ND FL. 4 4028 TOTAL 10 10070 BASEMENT FL. 2 2 3204 15T FL. 4 4 0408 2ND FL. 4 4 6408 TOTAL 10 10 16020 C 1ST FL. 4 2852 2ND FL. 4 2852 3RD FL. 4 2852 TOTAL 12 8556 D BASEMENT PARK'G/STOR. 2314/374 1ST FL. 4 4028 2ND FL. 4 4028 3RD FL. 4 4028 TOTAL 12 14772 E 1ST FL. 4 2852 1ST FL. PARK'G/STOR. 2116/900 2ND FL. 8 5704 3RD FL. 8 5704 TOTAL 20 17276 F 15T FL. 4 3556 2ND FL. 4 3556 3RD FL. 4 3556 TOTAL 12 10668 G 15T FL. 4 2852 15T FL. PARK'G/STOR. 2116/900 2ND FL. 8 5704 3RD FL. 8 5704 TOTAL 20 17276 TOTAL=106 du 62 22 22 TOTAL AREA 88092 DU TOTAL AREA 2174 STORAGE TOTAL AREA 6546 PARKING REC. BLDG. 1460 TOTAL AREA RECEIVED 98272 PROJ ECT MAR 7 9 1996 DEVELOPIviENT PLANNING Environmental Checklist • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND RECEIVED MAR 2 c 1996 1 . Name of proposed project, if applicable: Renton Crown Apartments. DEVEtof DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON 2. Name of applicant: The Leitzke Architects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: The Leitzke Architects 6002142ND Ave. S.E. Steve Leitzke tel &fax 747-0414 pager 989-9375 4. Date checklist prepared: 2/12/96 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is scheduled to begin in June of 1996 and finish March 1997. The proposal is not phased. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: Yes. A portion of the site is currently zoned single family and cannot be utilized for commercial purposes. The single family portion of the site is burdened by steep slopes and can only be accessed from Rainier Ave. through the commercially zoned portion of the site. We believe the single family zoned portions of the site are unsuitable for single family housing given the access and topographical problems. We have discussed with Staff the possibility of utilizing • this area for additional parking, storage, and expanded recreational uses (See attached letter to Mark Pywell, 01/11/96). Although Staff has been sympathetic and supportive of our suggestions, we have been informed that a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone is required. We have also been informed that the Comp. Man Amendment and Rezone would have to precede Site Man Review. We have therefore elected to proceed with our current proposal (reducing the number of units proposed from 120 to 106) which is located entirely within the Environmental Checklist • commercially zoned portion of the site. The Comp. flan Amendment and rezone of the single family portion of the site will be submitted as a separate action at a later date. The future proposal will include the construction of additional parking (garages and carports) and additional multi-family units in accordance with the conditions of the rezone. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Boundary and topographic survey prepared by Dodd's Engineers. Soils report prepared by Golder Associates including the following relevant documents was prepared for a prior development proposal. Our development proposal, differs significantly from the prior proposal: Shannon and Wilson, Inc., 1979a,"Preliminary Soil Explorations for Development of Property near Bryn Mawr, Rainier Ave. South," Report W-3534-01, July 17. Shannon and Wilson, Inc., 1979b, "Soil Exploration Borings Regarding Development of Property near Bryn Mawr, Rainier Ave. South," Report W-3534- 02, October 15. Shannon and Wilson, Inc., 1988, "Transmittal of preliminary Test Fit Logs, proposed Development at Rainier Ave. North and South 119th Street, Renton, Washington," Report W-3534-05, July 19. A supplemental soils report will be prepared by Earth Consultants utilizing the prior soils investigation information including borings and test pits. Earth Consultants will conduct additional site investigation to be used in preparing their report. The report will address the slope stability and foundation support issues specific to our proposal. We anticipate the report will be available by March 201996. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known: Grade and fill permit, building permit, street use permit WSDOT, plumbing mechanical, and electrical permits. FAA approval was mentioned at the Fre-app meeting due to the proximity to the Airport. Our buildings are three stories with the highest part of the roof at least 20 feet below the Huff directly to the South and West and substantially below the tree line. Insofar as the proposal is lower in elevation than the existing obstacles FAA approval would not be required. We will complete the required FAA Form 7460, Notice of proposed Construction or Alteration. Environmental Checklist 1 1 . Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The site area within the boundaries indicated on the Site Man is 329,954 sq. ft. (7.57 acres) in area. According to topo information at hand aprox. 56000 sq. ft. of the site is on slopes equal to or exceeding 40%. These steep slopes occur primarily within the boundaries of those portions of the site which are currently zoned for single family use. The portions of the site currently zoned single family are not a part of this proposal. The project includes seven multifamily buildings containing from 10 to 20 units ea. The buildings identified as Bldgs. C, E, and G have parking below. A recreation building of 1600 sq. ft. and pool is provided. The mulifamily buildings range in size from 10000 sq. ft. to 16900 sq.ft. The total sq. footage of the proposal is 98644 sci. ft. See attached document CROWN4.doc for exact summary of areas. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist: The proposed development is located in the City of Renton and lies West of Rainier Ave. South, South of vacated 5. 118th Street, and North of vacated S. 120th Street. The Northerly end of the City of Renton Airport lies directly to the East. See attached legal description and vicinity map. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of this site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other ;,. o L.b3vE The site has a variety of slope conditions. There is a bench adjacent to Rainier Ave. on the Easterly portion of the site with slopes less than 5%. This bench is approximately 100 feet wide at the widest point and decreases in width at the Southerly property line. At the Westerly edge of this bench is a steep manmade "cut" slope which is the result of mining operations on the site. The"cut" slope is Environmental Checklist . • approximately 15 feet in height and runs North/ South the full length of the property. A much larger bench occurs at the top of the"cut" slope. The average slope of this second bench is aprox. 10%. Slopes between 25%to 40% occur at the Southerly portion of the site creating a buffer approximately 150 feet horizontally from the neighboring property to the South and 60 feet lower in elevation. The Westerly portion of the site has slopes of 40% and greater extending 150 beyond the nearest proposed building and at least 60 feet lower in elevation. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximately percent slope)? Over 40 % c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland: See attached soils report. The fills found on the site are generally Silty Clay, Silty Sand (CL). There is evidence of topsoils in the some of the fill material.. Native undisturbed soils are generally stiff gray motted brown, silty clay (CL) and compact to dense, gray mottled brown, medium to coarse sand,trace gravel (SM). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe: Yes. There have been some minor slide activity South of the Site on the West side of Rainier Ave. The slopes in this area are much steeper than found on the proposal (50-100%) and appear to have been created as a result of the. excavation for Rainier Ave. e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill: The site has been extensively graded in the past. There are areas of compacted and uncompacted fills of varying depths which must be removed. Some of this material (sands and gravels) will be removed and recompacted in parking and landscape areas, and under buildings on the Western portion of the site. Some of the existing fills are unsuitable as fill material will be removed from the site or placed in the landscape areas. An onsite Soils Engineer will determine which soils are available for recompaction. We estimate that at least half of the existing soils to be cut can be relocated and recompacted. The grading plan illustrates that we intend to regrade the site so that the buildings and roads can be founded on the native soils if possible. Where structural fills under buildings and roads are necessary due to the depth of existing fills; suitable fill Environmental Checklist materials will either be found onsite or they will be imported from local quarries, and compacted in accordance with the recommendations of the Soils Engineer. Due to the extensive cuts proposed importing of structural fill material is not anticipated unless weather conditions prevent the use of onsite materials. Approximately 20000 cu.yds. of material will be exported and another 20000 cu.yds. of material will be be cut and re-used onsite.. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe: Due to the nature of the soils found on the site erosion can occur. Short term erosion impacts would most likely occur during clearing and grading operations and during construction. Long term erosion impacts are not likely as a result of use and will be reduced in the long term by the regrading of steep slopes and revegitation of those areas which are currently in a constant state of erosion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 35.6%. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Erosion impacts will be reduced in the long term by the regrading and flattening the steeper slopes within the development and revegitation of those areas. See temp. erosion plan. Filter fences will be utilized at the boundaries of the site. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known: Construction activity will result in additional emmissions from exhaust from construction equipment. Increased emissions from airborn dust is anticipated depending upon the time of year. There will be no long term impacts to the air as a result of the use. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe: No Environmental Checklist c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Water trucks will be utilized during periods of dry weather to minimize impacts from dust during construction. A rock entrance will be provided in order to assist in removing loose soil from trucks leaving the site. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into: Lake Washington 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans: No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material: None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known: Yes. The Soils Engineer has indicated a number existing areas that have poor drainage. Generally,the surface water in these areas will be routed to a water quality swale prior to entering the site storm drainage system. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan: No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge: No Environmental Checklist b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known: No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: None • c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe: Stormwater runoff from the roofs and parking areas will be collected in pipes and directed to a baffle oil water separator,then grass lined water quality swales along the Northerly and Easterly property lines which converge at the Northeast corner of the property into a type 11 catch basin, and finally into the existing 36 inch storm drain at this location. The storm water eventually is released into Lake Washington. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe: No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water impact, if any: Biofiltration measures will be provided., The length of water quality swales provided is in excess of City requirements. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation foud on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple,- aspen, other Environmental Checklist • _x evergreen treeCfir, cedar p, i other shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The site currently has minimal vegetation in the area proposed for development, including those areas to be graded. The existing trees and vegetation at the South and West will be left in their natural state. The South slope will be planted with material intended to reduce the possibility of erosion. See Landscape Man. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site: None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Substantial landscaping is proposed utilizing indigenous plant materials. With the exception of the property immediately adjacent to the South and West property lines, no significant vegetation currently exists. All of the existing evergreen and deciduous trees shrubs and grasses in these areas are to be preserved in their natural state. The remainder of the site will be revegetated. See Landscape Man. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, ongbi , other: sparrow • Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: none Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: none b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site: None Environmental Checklist C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain: None d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Use of indigenous plant materials to attract wildlife. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.: Electric for lighting and heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe: No. The property to the North that could be affected by the proposal is an existing office building and set back from the Northerly property line +70 feet. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Water saver toilets and restricted flow shower heads. Water heaters set at the lowest possible temp. Fire places will be fitted with glass doors and outside air kits. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: None 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required: N.A. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N.A. Environmental Checklist • - b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing vehicular traffic on Rainier Ave. will impact the intended use. The existing Airfield will impact the proposal. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term noise impacts will be generated by construction equipment. Long term impacts will be from additional automobile traffic to and from the development. Weekdays from 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. during construction. Weekdays and weekends from 7:00 A.M.to 7:00 P.M. post construction. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Require construction equipment to be properly muffled. Construction shall be limited to normal construction hours, 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. A Transportation Management Man will be implemented to reduce the numbers of trips to and from the site. Noise impacts from the Airport are not anticipated to adversely impact the proposal. The proposed buildings are out of the 60 dBA noise contours for the Airport. Furthermore, Seatac Airport noise studies prepared for the City of Des Moines to address noise mitigation measures recommended a number of remedies which are now required by law in order to comply with the Washington Energy Code, such as, additional insulation in the ceilings and walls, sealing of wall plates, insulating floor cavities at the outside walls, and the use of vapor barriers which in addition to preventing air infiltration also prevent the intrusion of sound. The use of resilient channels between floors will greatly improve the acoustical performance of the structures. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently vacant. The adjacent property to the North is an office use. The East on the opposite side of Rainier Ave. is the Renton Municipal Airport. The adjacent properties to the South and West are residential. Environmental Checklist b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe: No c. Describe any structures on the site: None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? ZONING DESIGNATION: 4-31-10.4: ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL, AMENDED MAY 1, 1995, ORDINANCE 4513. MULTI-FAMILY SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE MULTI- FAMILY ZONE, COMMUNITY CENTER, (MF-C), SECTION 4-31-8.D OF CHAPTER 31, TITLE IV, OF THE CITY CODE. THE PORTIONS OF THE SITE UNAFFECTED BY THIS PROPOSAL ARE ZONED SINGLE FAMILY(R-8). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Center Suburban and Single Family Residential. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N.A. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify: Yes, Greenbelt areas have been established in the areas of steep slopes. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 140 will reside in the project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None Environmental Checklist Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposal is well buffered from the residential development to the West and South. The proposed buildings adjacent to the residential properties are over 15D feet horizontally from the nearest residential structure. There is a vertical drop in topography of at least 15 feet from the grade line of the residential structures to the highest ridgeline within the proposal, so that any existing views will be preserved and the visual impacts to the neighboring properties will be minimized. Access to the proposal does not impact the residential properties. The vegetative buffer within the greenbelt areas will riot be disturbed. Complies with Policy LU-171: Residential uses in the Employment Area may be a single use development and should be limited to a max density of 20 du/acre. Policy LU-174: The parking areas are well buffered from Rainier Ave. Policy LU-175: The buildings proposed along Rainier Ave. are setback from the property line an average of 30 to 40 feet allowing for additional landscaping. The minimum allowable setback is 20 feet. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing: 106 middle income units. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle , or low-income housing: None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest structure is under 34.85 feet in height. The principal exterior materials are: Roofing: Asphalt shingles Exterior siding: Vinyl siding Windows: PVC frames with wood trim. Environmental Checklist - b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The buildings will be modulated so that long expanses of wall do not occur without modulation. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Lighting in the parking areas. Evenings. The orientation of the buildings and • average height above Rainier Ave. will not result in adverse glare impacts. • b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Lighting is proposed to provide security to the parked automobiles and people going to and from their automobile. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Lighting proposed will be low-glare type, with hidden light source 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Atlantic City Park, Lakeridge Park, Coulon Memorial Beach Park, biking trails. b; Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so describe: No Environmental Checklist - c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The proposal includes a recreation facility with exercise room and equipment. An indoor spa and outdoor pool is proposed. A parks mitigation fee will be applied to the proposal in excess of$300/dwelling unit. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe: None b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site: None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any: The proposal is provided access from Rainer Ave. South. The site plan has been modified from our earlier submittal (Pre-Application Aug. 1, 1995) to incorporate a dual access drive to the loop road which serves the project. Jim Gray had requested that we provide two points of access for fire truck apparatus. After investigating alternate grading options, I am satisfied that the topography of the site is such that two separated drives at either end of the site along Rainier is not possible without extensive regrading of the Southerly steep slope and placement of retaining structures. The Geotechnical Report by Golder recommends cuts no greater than 4H: 1V and no grading which could undermine and destabilize the steep slopes to the South and West. An access road at the Southeasterly corner of the site would be contrary to the Environmental Checklist recommendations of the Soils Engineer and could result in unsafe conditions during construction and in the completed project. Therefore, we have elected to comply with Mr. Gray's recommendation by providing two separated drives at the Northeasterly corner of the site which connect to a looped fire lane. The two buildings along Rainier can be accessed from two points, Rainier and the"loop road". The balance of the buildings can be accessed from two different directions on the"loop road". I believe this configuration meets the requirements of the Uniform Fire Code. Internal circulation between adjacent parcels is not possible because achieving the required access would require eliminating two parking spaces on the adjacent property. The proposed access configuration is in conformance with Policy LU -170: "minimize curb cuts and share access points" "centralize signing" "provide landscaping and streetscaping to soften visual impacts" b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit shop? No. 250 feet. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 186. None. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes. Renton Municipal Airport. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 636 trips/day. Peak volumes would occur during the morning hours from 7:00 A.M. to 8:30 A.M. and evening hours from 4:30 P.M. to 6:30 P.M. Environmental Checklist g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The proposal itself is a mitigating factor. A Transportation Management Plan (TMP) will be implemented as follows: An information center will be provided in the Recreation Building which will include bus schedules, bus routes, car pooling information and bulletin board, and a Metro contact number for assistance. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would there project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe: The proposal may require some additional police protection. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: Provide adequate security lighting to deter theft and other crimes. Provide deadbolt locks on unit entrance doors. Provide"peepholes" on entrance doors. Provide additional pin type locks on sliding doors. Provide secure garages will doors for some of the units. Provide 24hour video cam surveillance of all vehicles entering or leaving the premises. Wire the individual dwelling units for optional monitor motion detector security system. Provide lockable storage lockers. Provide sprinkler and fire protection alarm systems on all the buildings, except the recreation building. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: 'electricity,natural gas, water,:refuse service,,.telephone, sanitary sewe?,septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed: Electricity: Puget Power Additional transformers on site. Gas: Washington Natural Gas Telephone: US West Cable: Viacom Environmental Checklist Water: There is an existing 16 inch water main available on Rainier Ave. S. The buildings will be designed not to exceed 3300 gpm fire flow availability, which will include the use of the fire sprinkler system. An & inch "looped" main is proposed. Sewer: Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge&City of Renton sewer exchange per prior agreement. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there b any willful misrepresentati. • :ck of full dis losure my part. 1111 Proponent: Name Printed: Steve Leitzke, Architect J Date: MA►11-• . VaON Ce Inn L OTZKE 6102 142ND AVE. SE BELLEVUE,WA. 98006 747-0414 989-9375 PAGER 01/03/96 CITY OF RENTON JIM HANSEN, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR MARK PYWELL- SENIOR PLANNER RE: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS 800 RAINIER AVENUE GENTLEMEN: The attached site plan is provide for your use. The plan is incomplete in that it does not address all of your comments during our preapp Aug 3. The purpose of this submittal is to request an Administrative ruling on the ,following issues so that we may proceed with our site plan: Given that the single family portions of the site will not be developed as single family do to topographical and access difficulties and given that no buildings are proposed within the single family zoned portion of the site. Can we construct an access road (fire loop) on the single family zoned portion of the site as shown? Can we use this land which is unsuited for single family for additional parking? Is it possibble to do a PUP or obtain a Conditional Use Permit to construct duplexes within the single family zoned portion of the site? After review of several access layouts, I am convinced that two separated access drives at the North and South ends of the site along Rainier Ave. is impractical due to topography. The South access would be at a grade exceeding 16%and could only be achieved through the use of extensive retaining structures and could destabilize the steep slopes in this area. The proposed configuration provides a dual access route and immediately connects to a looped access. This loop provides two points of access to all the structures. The two structures along Rainier can be accessed either from Rainier or the access drive and meet the 300'access requirement for fire truck apparatus (From Rainier). I believe this meets all the Uniform Fire Code requirements for access. If you have any questions please contact me at your convenience. Since Steve .- Architect 6102 142ND AVE. S.E. BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON, 98006 206-747-6869 LI 1 ZII t 6102 142ND AVE. SE BELLEVUE, WA. 98006 747-0414 989-9375 PAGER 01/03/96 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON JIM HANSEN, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR MAR 2 0 1996 MARK I'YWELL- SENIOR PLANNER DEVELOPMENT PLANNING RE: RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS CITY OF RENTON 800 RAINIER AVENUE GENTLEMEN: The attached site plan is provide for your use. The plan is incomplete in that it does riot address all of your comments during our preapp Aug 3. The purpose of this submittal is to request an Administrative ruling on the following issues so that we may proceed with our site plan: Given that the single family portions of the site will not be developed as single family do to topographical and access difficulties and given that no buildings are proposed within the single family zoned portion of the site. Can we construct an access road (fire loop) on the single family zoned portion of the site as shown? Can we use this land which is unsuited for single family for additional parking? Is it possibble to do a PUD or obtain a Conditional Use Permit to construct duplexes within the single family zoned portion of the site? After review of several access layouts, I am convinced that two separated access drives at the North and South ends of the site along Rainier Ave. is impractical due to topography. The South access would be at a grade exceeding 16% and could only be achieved through the use of extensive retaining structures and could destabilize the steep slopes in this area. The proposed configuration provides a dual access route and immediately connects to a looped access. This loop provides two points of access to all the structures. The two structures along Rainier can be accessed either from Rainier or the access drive and meet the 300' access requirement for fire truck apparatus (From Rainier). I believe this meets all the Uniform Fire Code requirements for access. Environmental Checklist - - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1 . Name of proposed project, if applicable: Renton Crown Apartments. 2. Name of applicant: The Leitzke Architects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: The Leitzke Architects 6002142ND Ave. S.E. Steve Leitzke tel &fax 747-0414 pager 989-9375 4. Date checklist prepared: 2/12/96 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is scheduled to begin in June of 1996 and finish March 1997. The proposal is not phased. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: Yes. A portion of the site is currently zoned single family and cannot be utilized for commercial purposes. The single family portion of the site is burdened by steep slopes and can only be accessed from Rainier Ave. through the commercially zoned portion of the site. We believe the single family zoned portions of the site are unsuitable for single family housing given the access and topographical problems. We have discussed with Staff the possibility of utilizing this area for additional parking, storage, and expanded recreational uses (See attached letter to Mark 1'ywell, 01/11/96). Although Staff has been sympathetic and supportive of our suggestions, we have been informed that a Comprehensive Man Amendment and Rezone is required. We have also been informed that the Comp. Man Amendment and Rezone would have to precede Site Man Review. We have therefore elected to proceed with our current proposal (reducing the number of units proposed from 120 to 106) which is located entirely within the Environmental Checklist - - commercially zoned portion of the site. The Comp. Flan Amendment and rezone of the single family portion of the site will be submitted as a separate action at a later date. The future proposal will include the construction of additional parking (garages and carports) and additional multi-family units in accordance with the conditions of the rezone. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Boundary and topographic survey prepared by Dodd's Engineers. Soils report prepared by Golder Associates including the following relevant documents was prepared for a prior development proposal. Our development proposal, differs significantly from the prior proposal: Shannon and Wilson, Inc., 1979a, "Preliminary Soil Explorations for Development of Property near Bryn Mawr, Rainier Ave. South," Report W-3534-01, July 17. Shannon and Wilson, Inc., 1979b, "Soil Exploration Borings Regarding Development of Property near Bryn Mawr, Rainier Ave. South," Report W-3534- 02, October 15. Shannon and Wilson, Inc., 1988, "Transmittal of Preliminary Test Fit Logs, proposed Development at Rainier Ave. North and South 119th Street, Renton, Washington," Report W-3534-05, July 19. A supplemental soils report will be prepared by Earth Consultants utilizing the prior soils investigation information including borings and test pits. Earth Consultants will conduct additional site investigation to be used in preparing their report. The report will address the slope stability and foundation support issues specific to our proposal. We anticipate the report will be available by March 201996. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known: Grade and fill permit, building permit, street use permit WSDOT, plumbing mechanical, and electrical permits. FAA approval was mentioned at the Fre-app meeting due to the proximity to the Airport. Our buildings are three stories with the highest part of the roof at least 20 feet below the bluff directly to the South and West and substantially below the tree line. Insofar as the proposal is lower in elevation than the existing obstacles FAA approval would not be required. We will complete the required FAA Form 7460, Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration. Environmental Checklist - - 1 1 . Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The site area within the boundaries indicated on the Site flan is 329,954 sq. ft. (7.57 acres) in area. According to topo information at hand aprox. 56000 sq. ft. of the site is on slopes equal to or exceeding 40%. These steep slopes occur primarily within the boundaries of those portions of the site which are currently zoned for single family use. The portions of the site currently zoned single family are not a part of this proposal. The project includes seven multifamily buildings containing from 10 to 20 units ea. The buildings identified as Bldgs. C, E, and G have parking below. A recreation building of 1600 sq. ft. and pool is provided. The mulifamily buildings range in size from 10000 sq. ft. to 16900 sq. ft. The total sq.footage of the proposal is 98644 sq. ft. See attached document CR0WN4.doc for exact summary of areas. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist: The proposed development is located in the City of Renton and lies West of Rainier Ave. South, South of vacated 5. 118th Street, and North of vacated S. 120th Street. The Northerly end of the City of Renton Airport lies directly to the East. See attached legal description and vicinity map. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of this site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other .bovE . The site has a variety of slope conditions. There is a bench adjacent to Rainier Ave. on the Easterly portion of the site with slopes less than 5%. This bench is approximately 100 feet wide at the widest point and decreases in width at the Southerly property line. At the Westerly edge of this bench is a steep manmade "cut" slope which is the result of mining operations on the site. The"cut" slope is Environmental Checklist approximately 15 feet in height and runs North/ South the full length of the property. A much larger bench occurs at the top of the"cut" slope. The average slope of this second bench is aprox. 10%. Slopes between 25%to 40% occur at the Southerly portion of the site creating a buffer approximately 150 feet horizontally from the neighboring property to the South and 60 feet lower in elevation. The Westerly portion of the site has slopes of 40% and greater extending 150 beyond the nearest proposed building and at least 60 feet lower in elevation. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximately percent slope)? Over 40 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland: See attached soils report. The fills found on the site are generally Silty Clay, Silty Sand (CL). There is evidence of topsoils in the some of the fill material. Native undisturbed soils are generally stiff gray motted brown, silty clay (CL) and compact to dense, gray mottled brown, medium to coarse sand,trace gravel (SM). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe: Yes. There have been some minor slide activity South of the Site on the West side of Rainier Ave. The slopes in this area are much steeper than found on the proposal (50-100%) and appear to have been created as a result of the excavation for Rainier Ave. e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill: The site has been extensively graded in the past. There are areas of compacted and uncompacted fills of varying depths which must be removed. Some of this material (sands and gravels) will be removed and recompacted in parking and landscape areas, and under buildings on the Western portion of the site. Some of the existing fills are unsuitable as fill material will be removed from the site or placed in the landscape areas. An onsite Soils Engineer will determine which soils are available for recompaction. We estimate that at least half of the existing soils to be cut can be relocated and recompacted. The grading plan illustrates that we intend to regrade the site so that the buildings and roads can be founded on the native soils if possible. Where structural fills under buildings and roads are necessary due to the depth of existing fills: suitable fill Environmental Checklist - materials will either be found onsite or they will be imported from local quarries, and compacted in accordance with the recommendations of the Soils Engineer. Due to the extensive cuts proposed importing of structural fill material is not anticipated unless weather conditions prevent the use of onsite materials. Approximately 20000 cu.yds. of material will be exported and another 20000 cu.yds. of material will be be cut and re-used onsite.. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe: Due to the nature of the soils found on the site erosion can occur. Short term erosion impacts would most likely occur during clearing and grading operations and during construction. Long term erosion impacts are not likely as a result of use and will be reduced in the long term by the regrading of steep slopes and revegitation of those areas which are currently in a constant state of erosion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 35.6%. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Erosion impacts will be reduced in the long term by the regrading and flattening the steeper slopes within the development and revegitation of those areas. See temp. erosion plan. Filter fences will be utilized at the boundaries of the site. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known: Construction activity will result in additional emmissions from exhaust from construction equipment. Increased emissions from airborn dust is anticipated depending upon the time of year. There will be no long term impacts to the air as a result of the use. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe: No Environmental Checklist c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Water trucks will be utilized during periods of dry weather to minimize impacts from dust during construction. A rock entrance will be provided in order to assist in removing loose soil from trucks leaving the site. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1 ) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into: Lake Washington 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans: No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material: None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known: Yes. The Soils Engineer has indicated a number existing areas that have poor drainage. Generally, the surface water in these areas will be routed to a water quality swale prior to entering the site storm drainage system. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan: No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge: No Environmental Checklist b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known: No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe: Stormwater runoff from the roofs and parking areas will be collected in pipes and directed to a baffle oil water separator, then grass lined water duality swales along the Northerly and Easterly property lines which converge at the Northeast corner of the property into a type 11 catch basin, and finally into the existing 36 inch storm drain at this location. The storm water eventually is released into Lake Washington. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe: No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water impact, if any: Biofiltration measures will be provided. The length of water c uality swales provided is in excess of City requirements. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation:fou d on the site: x deciduous tree:cr, maple, aspen, other Environmental Checklist - _x evergreen tree eda pin other x shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The site currently has minimal vegetation in the area proposed for development, including those areas to be graded. The existing trees and vegetation at the South and West will be left in their natural state. The South slope will be planted with material intended to reduce the possibility of erosion. See Landscape Man. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site: None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Substantial landscaping is proposed utilizing indigenous plant materials. With the exception of the property immediately adjacent to the South and West property lines, no significant vegetation currently exists. All of the existing evergreen and deciduous trees shrubs and grasses in these areas are to be preserved in their natural state. The remainder of the site will be revegetated. See Landscape Man. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbi s, other: sparrow Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: none Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: none b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site: None Environmental Checklist C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain: None d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Use of indigenous plant materials to attract wildlife. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.: Electric for lighting and heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe: No. The property to the North that could be affected by the proposal is an existing office building and set back from the Northerly property line +70 feet. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Water saver toilets and restricted flow shower heads. Water heaters set at the lowest possible temp. Fire places will be fitted with glass doors and outside air kits. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: None 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required: N.A. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N.A. Environmental Checklist -- - b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing vehicular traffic on Rainier Ave. will impact the intended use. The existing Airfield will impact the proposal. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term noise impacts will be generated by construction equipment. Long term impacts will be from additional automobile traffic to and from the development. Weekdays from 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 I7.M. during construction. Weekdays and weekends from 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 17.M. post construction. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Require construction equipment to be properly muffled. Construction shall be limited to normal construction hours, 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 F.M. A Transportation Management Man will be implemented to reduce the numbers of trips to and from the site. Noise impacts from the Airport are not anticipated to adversely impact the proposal. The proposed buildings are out of the 60 d5A noise contours for the Airport. Furthermore, Seatac Airport noise studies prepared for the City of Des Moines to address noise mitigation measures recommended a number of remedies which are now required by law in order to comply with the Washington Energy Code, such as, additional insulation in the ceilings and walls, sealing of wall plates, insulating floor cavities at the outside walls, and the use of vapor barriers which in addition to preventing air infiltration also prevent the intrusion of sound. The use of resilient channels between floors will greatly improve the acoustical performance of the structures. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently vacant. The adjacent property to the North is an office use. The East on the opposite side of Rainier Ave. is the Renton Municipal Airport. The adjacent properties to the South and West are residential. Environmental Checklist b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe: No c. Describe any structures on the site: None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? ZONING DESIGNATION: 4-31-10.4: ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL, AMENDED MAY 1, 1995, ORDINANCE 4513. MULTI-FAMILY SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE MULTI- FAMILY ZONE, COMMUNITY CENTER, (MF-C), SECTION 4-31-8.D OF CHAPTER 31, TITLE IV, OF THE CITY CODE. THE PORTIONS OF THE SITE UNAFFECTED BY THIS PROPOSAL ARE ZONED SINGLE FAMILY (R-8). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Center Suburban and Single Family Residential. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N.A. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify: Yes, Greenbelt areas have been established in the areas of steep slopes. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 140 will reside in the project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None Environmental Checklist - Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposal is well buffered from the residential development to the West and South. The proposed buildings adjacent to the residential properties are over 150 feet horizontally from the nearest residential structure. There is a vertical drop in topography of at least 15 feet from the grade line of the residential structures to the highest ridgeline within the proposal, so that any existing views will be preserved and the visual impacts to the neighboring properties will be minimized. Access to the proposal does not impact the residential properties. The vegetative buffer within the greenbelt areas will riot be disturbed. Complies with Policy LU-171: Residential uses in the Employment Area may be a single use development and should be limited to a max density of 20 du/acre. Policy LU-174: The parking areas are well buffered from Rainier Ave. Policy LU-175: The buildings proposed along Rainier Ave. are setback from the property line an average of 30 to 40 feet allowing for additional landscaping. The minimum allowable setback is 20 feet. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing: 106 middle income units. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle , or low-income housing: None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest structure is under 34.85 feet in height. The principal exterior materials are: Roofing: Asphalt shingles Exterior siding: Vinyl siding Windows: INC frames with wood trim. 4 ` Environmental Checklist b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The buildings will be modulated 50 that long expanses of wall do not occur without modulation. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Lighting in the parking areas. Evenings. The orientation of the buildings and average height above Rainier Ave. will not result in adverse glare impacts. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Lighting is proposed to provide security to the parked automobiles and people going to and from their automobile. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Lighting proposed will be low-glare type, with hidden light source 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Atlantic City f ark, Lakeridge Park, Coulon Memorial Beach Park, biking trails. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so describe: No Environmental Checklist c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The proposal includes a recreation facility with exercise room and equipment. An indoor spa and outdoor pool is proposed. A parks mitigation fee will be applied to the proposal in excess of$3OO/dwelling unit. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe: None b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site: None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any: The proposal is provided access from Rainer Ave. South. The site plan has been modified from our earlier submittal (i're-Application Aug. 1, 1995) to incorporate a dual access drive to the loop road which serves the project. Jim Gray had requested that we provide two points of access for fire truck apparatus. After investigating alternate grading options, I am satisfied that the topography of the site is such that two separated drives at either end of the site along Rainier is not possible without extensive regrading of the Southerly steep slope and placement of retaining structures. The Geotechnical Report by Golder recommends cuts no greater than 4H: 1V and no grading which could undermine and destabilize the steep slopes to the South and West. An access road at the Southeasterly corner of the site would be contrary to the Environmental Checklist recommendations of the Soils Engineer and could result in unsafe conditions during construction and in the completed project. Therefore, we have elected to comply with Mr. Gray's recommendation by providing two separated drives at the Northeasterly corner of the site which connect to a looped fire lane. The two buildings along Rainier can be accessed from two points, Rainier and the "loop road". The balance of the buildings can be accessed from two different directions on the"loop road". I believe this configuration meets the requirements of the Uniform Fire Code. Internal circulation between adjacent parcels is not possible because achieving the required access would require eliminating two parking spaces on the adjacent property. The proposed access configuration is in conformance with Policy LU -170: "minimize curb cuts and share access points" "centralize signing" "provide landscaping and streetscaping to soften visual impacts" b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit shop? No. 250 feet. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 186. None. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes. Renton Municipal Airport. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 636 trips/day. Beak volumes would occur during the morning hours from 7:00 A.M. to 8:30 A.M. and evening hours from 4:30 F.M. to 6:30 P.M. Environmental Checklist g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The proposal itself is a mitigating factor. A Transportation Management flan (TMI') will be implemented as follows: An information center will be provided in the Recreation Building which will include bus schedules, bus routes, car pooling information and bulletin board, and a Metro contact number for assistance. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would there project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe: The proposal may require some additional police protection. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: Provide adequate security lighting to deter theft and other crimes. Provide deadbolt locks on unit entrance doors. Provide"peepholes" on entrance doors. Provide additional pin type locks on sliding doors. Provide secure garages will doors for some of the units. Provide 24hour video cam surveillance of all vehicles entering or leaving the premises. Wire the individual dwelling units for optional monitor motion detector security system. Provide lockable storage lockers. Provide sprinkler and fire protection alarm systems on all the buildings, except the recreation building. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity�Cnatural ga�, wat re , refuse service; telephone;, (anitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed: Electricity: Puget Power Additional transformers on site. Gas: Washington Natural Gas Telephone: US West Cable: Viacom Environmental Checklist Water: There is an existing 16 inch water main available on Rainier Ave. S. The buildings will be designed not to exceed 3300 gpm fire flow availability, which will include the use of the fire sprinkler system. An & inch "looped" main is proposed. Sewer: Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge &City of Renton sewer exchange per prior agreement. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there b- any willful misrepresentati. • :ck of full dis losure • my part. 0111A Proponent: \ r Name Printed: Steve Leitzke, Architect Date: Ate- Vckc't Cfp If you have any questions please contact me at your convenience. Since 11 Steve - Architect 6102 142ND AVE. S.E. BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON, 98006 206-747-6869 • l C tHQllllENci: 94091.204 f'LcICL KENT,WA 98030 '(20fiD 650.0934' o: !G.X 727 5320 February 22 , 1996 CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN • RENTON CROWN APARTMENTS RAINIER 'AVE SOUTH @ S. 118th .ST. • CITY OF . RENTON . • PREPARED 'FORc Carlton .Development Goup; Inc: Mark Lundberg 704 NE Northlake Way Apo Seattle, Wa • 98105 , . . /9° ' (206) 547-4162 Dt—vs PREPARED. BY: :. James J. Jaeger, P.E . • 20734 /- r • I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is a multifamily residential development located west of Rainier Ave. S . between S . 118th St . and S . 120th St . , and west of the City of Renton Airport . It lies within the NW 1/4 of Section 7, Township 23 N. , Range 5 E. , W. M. The proposal includes 106 apartment units distributed within 7 buildings . A swimming pool and a recreational facility will also be part of the development . The project will gain access from Rainier Ave. S . , which is the only street that fronts the property. The proposed driveway will slope up to the west from Rainier Ave. at a maximum of 120, with a gentler landing near the ROW line. The development will continue to rise up to the west with the driveways and parking aisles at a maximum grade of 120 . The existing site is an old gravel pit that has been idle for many years . Prior to that, a tavern was located at the site before being destroyed by fire. The south and west perimeters are fairly steep treed slopes . These slopes are beyond the proposed development area and will not be disturbed. There is an existing office complex to the north. The project area includes a narrow, level bench adjacent to the street, wider to the north. A steep 15 ft . bank separates this lower bench from a much larger plateau in the central portion of the site . This is the primary area of the development . The site has had numerous geotechnical studies performed which have indicated the presence of significant • fill areas . II . CORE REQUIREMENTS AND WORKSHEET The drainage core requirements are identified in the City adaptation of the King County Drainage Manual . Each of these five core requirements have been reviewed and addressed in this report and accompanying drainage design. The core requirements were addressed as follows : 1 . The natural drainage discharge location of the site is at the low corner which is the northeast corner along Rainier Ave. There are catch basins along Rainier Ave . that might collect the sheet flow down the site slopes . There are also catch basins along the south edge of pavement of the office complex parking area to the north which may also collect the existing runoff . The developed drainage will discharge into the existing 36" piped system that runs along the west and north edges of the project . This system was installed to collect runoff from the residential development west of the project . It also collects the runoff from the parking lot north of the subject site. The developed discharge location will be near the northeast corner. 2 . An off-site drainage analysis is included in this report in Section VI . A level one off-site drainage analysis is included. 3 . Peak rate runoff control is not proposed. \ There is an exemption in the code for direct discharges into a receiving water body. In this case, there is a direct piped discharge into Lake Washington, approx. 1800 ft . downstream from the project . 4 . A conveyance system will be designed and submitted with the engineering plans . A network of catch basins and pipes will generally be located along the centerlines of the driveways and parking lots . The pavement will have negative crowns to channel the runoff into the catch basins . The conveyance system will be able to handle the 25 year flows within the pipes and the 100 year flows within the catch basins or the driveway prisms . 5 . An erosion and sedimentation control plan will be submitted with the engineering plans . Page 1 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART T• ''PROJECT'OWNER.AND `• PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION , • ' • PROJECT ENGINEER ` AND DESCRIPTION . • Project Owner CO-A-A-}-rrr\ DeoR-lo�p 1\.QN1 �srn 1 Project Name CiYoLv rnvN l'tf il'S Address 70 4- NE Nor-1'tAta I� 7-4,"di• Location Phone 547-- 41(D2 c e? 94/0' Township Z3 N Project Engineer �.*MQ5 3 e - 6 P. f=. Section 7 E Tc Company e r EAN-l‘n ee-► tVTh J Project Size 7. 577 AC Address Phone t i ct S . 4- FL• Upstream Drainage Basin Size l0 ± AC - - , . '03 eS0-09 • PART 3TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION PART 4 OTHER PERMITS • . 0 Subdivision 0 DOF/G HPA 0 Shoreline Management I 1 Short Subdivision 0 COE 404Rockery I I Grading I I DOE Dam Safety = Structural Vaults Commercial I I FEMA Floodplain n Other I Other 0 COE Wetlands I HPA PART 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN . , • Community B r•In r0o Lo r.Drainage Basin Lake__ ( , () kIN� Y 1rM - PART 6. SITE CHARACTERISTICS fl River I 1 Floodplain I 1 Stream 0 Wetlands 0 Critical Stream Reach = Seeps/Springs 1 Depressions/Swales II .= •High Groundwater Table j:Stl - Lake i-k- • U3O -k,vk '", I I Groundwater Recharge Steep Slopes SO1..)41 4 i ikrt per ` Other 0 Lakeside/Erosion Hazard PART 7' SOILS' ' e - .• Soil Type Slopes 'Erosion Potential, Erosive Velocities Stl-ki So-eJ Ieh - 1-0%% rn0cQ e 5 FPS I I Additional Sheets Attatched . 1/90 Page 2 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS ' REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT 11 I I I Ch.4-Downstream Analysis GQ 1 rec* C I SCJ�1 �. i�� I t c +tra--�tcrn S •.�t. © r€x D O F o- 1�p,-��-y. S 0 f El a I Additional Sheets Attatched PART 9' ESC"REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION f Sedimentation Facilities 1 Stabilize Exposed Surface It Stabilized Construction Entrance .11- Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities >^ Perimeter Runoff Control Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Clearing and Grading Restrictions Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities 5t" Cover Practices ti Flag Limits of NGPES Construction Sequence O Other 0 Other PART 10 SURFACE'WATER SYSTEM ,. V • • l Grass Lined Channel O Tank 0 Infiltration Method of Analysis )Q Pipe System 0 Vault I-1 Depression SI3U H 1 I Open Channel O Energy Dissapator 0 Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation 1 1 Dry Pond O Wetland fl Waiver of Eliminated Site torage 1 I Wet Pond F I Stream 0 Regional Detention ps - trec ' i5�r�u Brief Description of System Operation pp,.0€ p oriCAY pa-eA.s 4 a ri u-e s LA-2 1+k ro ve_4 BSI—tw Ilr��ex-�crnUnecT►y�a r�piv�m 'fte i co w • Facility Related Site Limitations n Additional Sheets Attatched Reference Facility Limitation PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PART 12 EASEMENTS/TRACTS • (May require special structural,review) , ' 1-"Drainage Easement 0 Cast in Place Vault O Other 11 Access Easement Retaining Wall I Native Growth Protection Easement Rockery>4'High - n Tract 0 Structural on Steep Slope V n Other PART 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ', . . ' • - • ; , ' I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site.Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attatchments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided Ipailivi_c)• 6• t) here is accurate. . / 1/90 III. EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS The existing drainage is basically a combination of sheet flow and shallow channel flow down the several banks and benches towards the east property line, or Rainier Ave . The drainage analysis considered only the area that will be used for the development . There is a considerable area along the south and west property lines that is too steep to develop, and is not within the commercial zone. In the developed condition, the drainage from this area will be diverted around the development and will not enter the drainage system. Thus, the 7 .57 acre total site area is reduced to 4 . 11 acres after this undisturbed area is subtracted. This "project area" is the same for the developed conditions calculations . The existing site has been previously disturbed by extensive grading for a gravel/sand mining operation. The north, east and central areas, which are the proposed development areas, do not have any trees . The vegetation is predominantly short grasses and scrub shrubs . The existing drainage analysis was performed using the SBUH hydrograph method and the "Waterworks" hydrology software . The methods outlined in the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual were uses as guidelines . Following this page is the data sheets used for the computer input data. The computer summary sheets for the peak flow and time of concentration are also attached. Below is a brief summary of the existing conditions drainage characteristics : Time of concentration: 30 . 82 minutes 2 year peak flow: 0 .46 CFS 10 year peak flow: 1 . 02 CFS 100 year peak flow: 1 . 72 CFS pervious area: 4 . 11 acres CN: 85 impervious area: none 2/25/96 Jaeger Engineering - page 1 Renton Crown Apartments Drainage Analysis Predeveloped Hydrograph Summaries BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: A10 NAME: Predeveloped, 10 year SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4 . 11 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 4 . 11 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 85 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 30 . 82 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 300 . 00 ns : 0 .2400 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0500 TcReach - Shallow L: 140 . 00 ks : 9 . 00 s : 0 . 1430 PEAK RATE: 1 . 02 cfs VOL: 0 .52 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: A100 NAME: Predeveloped, 100 year SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4 . 11 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 4 . 11 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 85 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 30 . 82 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 300 . 00 ns : 0 . 2400 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0500 TcReach - Shallow L: 140 . 00 ks : 9 . 00 s : 0 . 1430 PEAK RATE: 1. 72 cfs VOL: 0 . 81 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: A2 NAME: Predeveloped, 2 year SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4 . 11 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 4 . 11 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 85 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 30 . 82 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 300 . 00 ns : 0 .2400 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0500 TcReach - Shallow L: 140 . 00 ks : 9.. 00 s : 0 . 1430 PEAK RATE: 0 .46 cfs VOL: 0 .27 Ac-ft TIME : 480 min File ' Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool 3eee5eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee&eeeeeeeeee; eeeeeeeeee; o ° SHEET FLOW CALCULATOR - INITIAL 300 FEET ° ° O 0 ° ° °DES°Mannings Sheet Flow • 0 .2400 0 ° °ARE°Flow Length (ft) • 300 . 00 ICI °HOICES ° °RAI°2 yr 24 hr rainfall (in) : 2 . 00 ° ° °TIM°Land Slope (ft/ft) • 0 . 0500 ° ° °TIM° COMPUTED TRAVEL TIME (min) : 30 . 13 ° ° °RAI° TYPICAL MANNINGS VALUES FOR INITIAL 300 FT °A ° °ABS° 0 0 °BAS°Smooth Surfaces • 0 . 011 0 ° °STO°Fallow Fields of Loose Soil Surface • 0 . 05 °Y ° o °Cultivated Soil with residue cover (s<=0 .2 ft/ft) : 0 . 06 00 °PER°Cultivated Soil with residue cover (s>0 .2 ft/ft) . : 0 . 17 ° ° °ARE°Short prairie grass and lawns • 0 . 15 ° ° °CN °Dense grasses • 0 .24 ° ° o °Bermuda grass • 0 .41 ° ° o °Range (natural) • 0 . 13 ° ° °PEA°Woods or forest with light underbrush • 0 .40 ° ° °PEA°Woods or forest with dense underbrush • 0 . 80 0 ° °TOT° ° ° °OF10Key: QUIT F5Key: CLEAR °ete 0 o Pgaeeee&e&&eeeeeeeeeeeeee&eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefit ° Aeeeeeeeee&eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee&eeeeeeeeeeeef File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool 3eeeee&eeeeee&eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee&eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee&eeeeeeeeeeeeeee&eeeeeeee; o INPUT, MODIFY OR BROWSE DATA ° o 5ee&&e&eeeeeeeeeeee&eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee; ° °DES° SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW CALCULATOR 0 0 °ARE° 0 0 °RAI°Flow Length (ft) . . . : 140 . 00 TG2 ° ° °TIM°Land Slope (ft/ft) . : 0 . 1430 ° ° °TIM°Kc, Velocity Factor: 9 . 0 ° ° °RAI° COMPUTED TRAVEL TIME (min) : 0 . 69) ° ° °ABS° TYPICAL VELOCITY FACTOR VALUES - R=0 . 1 ° ° °BAS° 0 0 °STO°Forest with heavy ground litter and meadows (n=0 . 10) . : 3 0 0 o °Brushy ground with some trees (n=0 . 060) • 5 0 0 °PER°Fallow or minimum tillage cultivation (n=0 . 04) • 8 00 °ARE°High grass (n=0 . 035) • 9 0 0 °CN °Short grass, pasture and lawns (n=0 . 030) • 11 0 0 o °Nearly bare ground (n=0 . 025) • 13 ° ° o °Paved and gravel areas (n=0 . 012) • 27 ° ° °PEA° 0 0 °PEA°F10Key: QUIT F5Key: CLEAR 0 0 °TOTAeeeeeeeeeeeee&eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee&eeeeeeeeeef ° o HOME END F1 :Find F2 :New F3 :Get F4 :Tc-Calc F5 :Delete 0 o Pgup Pgdn F6 :Compute F7 : F8 :Method F9 :Template F10 :Exit ' 0 Aeeeeeeeeeee&eeee&eeee&eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee&&eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee&eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef fIRE. a r E0 PE-0 ME, aP Co►icENTR. M0N • is N C tRoLu 1 ,'i'S -17Rf�-N PtGE c.ptl it _i PRE - €LD'PE b DRY-i NAGE,. C J I,LATior\IS as«� 1 . To'k1 S sZg/ 954 31= oaooa , uuu'Sug33 �� 1� =EA z . - Fn zs e c' = /501 '14-1 ,SF- g#» 3 CD f.ey'e-S g3NONOic ii /OY\ -� .. vv000f �"-V�� - 3- $ern e. - 3. 4-to 411 ft c.. $ , R.,' Nums S , h.a-- be. . c s+v\---15 .01 6 ?t-e-vi s Avl (5.,c)kv I ties y rn kv\tv�. nb - r e 2 . (17533.te.... 3,5 ,Z 6 - mLu) err- .PoSA-v r2 C. , 71 V\ ( F C-E i c-5-1Q TRfN n o -3rla ISPLYI Ar s-e-s six 6 s, L, 3c�o I `s �-►-�- sl � 75-L Q 5 % • n s = o Zq- (c riasses 1, �a.b!e. 3, S,2 1 . TCZa 1.3 Mph. se_e. c-cwtf v'r-k-- su mma sk 1 — 1 s .'ow N PP. DRPrINIPTGE GA _A • = . 0 , "rymZ.. OF GONC-eNTR oN (c ) Z. G z cy-I Ge-d D,Sfi C_e_. CCU — l 40 ' ««3 L: 14-0 ' skc-4,Id a v,.e l REEH 0.A.-e, sly n - 41-o _ 3% I LL. s3 k , - 6:t ( ku,f-k i-ra.7.3" tb-bi e.. 3.5,2. \ sL_=> U PAMPA „.! "rG 2. z- 0 .‘...0-q PA t\N s•e_e- ats.,tv\poie-r- 5-ki okyst‘pi tizz ..-7 Z 0 t % a rn\y,utte_..5 p, I soPLON 1 Po_s Cc \ S . 3.s, 1 C — t) P2. Z%o \‘r\ciNo...s Rio Z , PZS = 3. 4 Il Pt 0 0 3.CI \l E. J K FRE - a N.PJ ()POD Pl--oWS ( 32_e_ criy.t..f.LA--0_3r. 6-Z. _ . 0.4c� e 'S 1 0 0io - ) ,l�Z GAS c ,o�,. 1,-7z ems IV. DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS The developed site will incorporate a network of catch basins and interconnecting piping within the parking lots and driveways . The pavement will be constructed with a negative crown to channel the runoff into the central catch basins . The roof and footing drains from the structures will be connected to the storm drain system. Numerous yard drain inlets will be strategically placed within the lawn areas to collect yard runoff . The collected runoff will be piped to the lower east property line, to a catch basin within the main entry driveway. This catch basin will include an oil/water separator. This catch basin will discharge into the biofiltration swale located in the northeast corner. Similar to the existing conditions drainage analysis, the SBUH hydrograph method will be used to determine the peak flow rates . An identical area was also used. The computer data input sheets follow this page as well as the computer summary sheets . A brief summary of the developed drainage characteristics are : Time of concentration: 12 . 23 minutes 2 year peak flow: 1 .46 CFS 10 year peak flow: 2 . 30 CFS 100 year peak flow: 3 . 26 CFS pervious area: 1 .32 acres CN: 86 impervious area: 2 . 79 acres CN: 98 2/25/96 Jaeger Engineering page 1 Renton Crown Apartments Drainage Analysis Developed Hydrograph Summaries BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: B10 NAME: Developed, 10 year SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4 . 11 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 1.32 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 12 .23 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 2 . 79 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 70 . 00 ns : 0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0290 TcReach - Channel L: 700 . 00 kc :42 . 00 s : 0 . 0380 TcReach - Channel L: 200 . 00 kc : 17 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 PEAK RATE: 2 .30 cfs VOL: 0 . 79 Ac-ft TIME : 480 min BASIN ID: B100 NAME : Developed, 100 year SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4 . 11 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 1 . 32 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 12 . 23 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 2 . 79 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 70 . 00 ns : 0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0290 TcReach - Channel L: 700 . 00 kc:42 . 00 s : 0 . 0380 TcReach - Channel L: 200 . 00 kc: 17 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 PEAK RATE : 3 .26 cfs VOL: 1 . 12 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: B2 NAME: Developed, 2 year SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 4 . 11 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 1 . 32 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 12 .23 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 2 . 79 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 70 . 00 ns : 0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s : 0 . 0290 TcReach - Channel L: 700 . 00 kc:42 . 00 s : 0 . 0380 TcReach - Channel L: 200 . 00 kc: 17 . 00 s : 0 . 0050 PEAK RATE: 1.46 cfs VOL: 0 .51 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool 3eee5eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee; eeeeeeeeee; o ° SHEET FLOW CALCULATOR - INITIAL 300 FEET ° ° o 0 0 0 °DES°Mannings Sheet Flow • 0 . 1500 al 0 ° °ARE°Flow Length (ft) • 70 . 00 °HOICES ° °RAI°2 yr 24 hr rainfall (in) : 2 . 00 ° ° °TIM°Land Slope (ft/ft) • 0 . 0290 0 ° °TIM° COMPUTED TRAVEL TIME (min) : 8 . 03 0 0 °RAI° TYPICAL MANNINGS VALUES FOR INITIAL 300 FT °A 0 °ABS° 0 0 °BAS°Smooth Surfaces • 0 . 011 ° ° °STO°Fallow Fields of Loose Soil Surface • 0 . 05 °Y ° o °Cultivated Soil with residue cover (s<=0 . 2 ft/ft) : 0 . 06 0 0 °PER°Cultivated Soil with residue cover (s>0 . 2 ft/ft) . : 0 . 17 ° ° °ARE°Short prairie grass and lawns • 0 . 15 0 ° °CN °Dense grasses • 0 . 24 0 ° o °Bermuda grass • 0 .41 ° ° o °Range (natural) • 0 . 13 ° ° °PEA°Woods or forest with light underbrush • 0 .40 0 ° °PEA°Woods or forest with dense underbrush • 0 . 80 0 ° °TOT° 0 0 °°F10Key: QUIT F5Key: CLEAR °ete ° o Pga22eeeeeeEEe2e2e2e2E2e22e2eeee2Eee688888ee2e22e2G2eeee2ee2e2eefit ° aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool 3eee5eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ; ee; o ° CHANNEL FLOW CALCULATOR ° ° o 0 0 0 °DES°Flow Length (ft) . . . : 700 . 00 1 C Z. ° ° °ARE°Land Slope (ft/ft) . : 0 . 0380 ° ° °RAI°Kc, Velocity Factor: 42 . 0 0 0 °TIM° COMPUTED TRAVEL TIME (min) : 1 .42 ° ° °TIM° TYPICAL VELOCITY FACTOR VALUES ° ° °RAI° R I° 0 0 °ABS° Intermittent Flow - R=0 . 2 ° ° °BAS°Forested swale w/ heavy ground litter (n=0 . 10) 5 0 0 °STO°Forested drainage course/ravine w/ defined channel bed (n=0 . 50) : 10 ° o °Rock-lined (n=0 . 035) . . . : 15 Grassed (n=0 . 030) . . . : 17 ° ° °PER°Earth-lined (n=0 . 025) . . : 20 CMP pipe (n=0 . 024) . . : 21 ° ° °ARE°Concrete pipe (n=0 . 012) : 42 other • 0 .508/n ° ° °CN ° Continous Flow - R=0 .4 0 0 o °Meandering stream w/ some pools (n=0 . 040) • 20 ° ° o °Rock-lined stream (n=0 . 035) 23 0 0 °PEA°Grassed-lined stream (n=0 . 030) • 27 ° °PEA°Other streams, man-made channels and pipe • 0 . 807/n ° °TOT° 0 0 °OF10Key: QUIT F5Key: CLEAR 0 0 o Pgaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef ° aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef 1 1 rn E OF Co^t cZkrn2, 1'1 o Ni File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool 3 ! eel O ° CHANNEL FLOW CALCULATOR ° ° O 0 °DES°Flow Length (ft) . . . : 200 . 00 T-C 3 0 0 °ARE°Land Slope (ft/ft) . : 0 . 0050 ° ° °RAI°Kc, Velocity Factor: 17 . 0 ° ° °TIM° COMPUTED TRAVEL TIME (min) : dp ° ° °TIM° TYPICAL VELOCITY FACTOR VALUES ° ° °RAI° 0 0 °ABS° Intermittent Flow - R=0 .2 ° ° °BAS°Forested swale w/ heavy ground litter (n=0 . 10) 5 0 0 °STO°Forested drainage course/ravine w/ defined channel bed (n=0 . 50) : 10 ° ° o °Rock-lined (n=0 . 035) . . . : 15 Grassed (n=0 . 030) . . . : 17 ° ° °PER°Earth-lined (n=0 . 025) . . : 20 CMP pipe (n=0 . 024) . . : 21 ° ° °ARE°Concrete pipe (n=0 . 012) : 42 other • 0 .508/n ° ° °CN ° Continous Flow - R=0 .4 ° ° o °Meandering stream w/ some pools (n=0 . 040) • 20 ° ° o °Rock-lined stream (n=0 . 035) • 23 ° °PEA°Grassed-lined stream (n=0 . 030) • 27 ° °PEA°Other streams, man-made channels and pipe • 0 . 807/n ° ° °TOT° 0 0 O°F10Key: QUIT F5Key: CLEAR 0 0 o Pgaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef ° aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool 3eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee1 o INPUT, MODIFY OR BROWSE DATA ° o BASIN ID B2 SBUH HYDROGRAPH ° °DES4eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ; ° °ARE° TIME OF CONC WORKSHEET °NFALL CHOICES 0 °RAI° <----Tc Reach Type----> Tt (min) °TYPE IA 0 °TIM° °TYPE I ° °TIM°REACH 1 [SHEET] [SHALLOW] [CHANNEL] 8 . 03 °TYPE II ° °RAI°REACH 2 [SHEET] [SHALLOW] [CHANNEL] 1 .42 °TYPE IIA ° °ABS°REACH 3 [SHEET] [SHALLOW] [CHANNEL] 2 . 77 °TYPE 3 ° °BAS°REACH 4 [SHEET] [SHALLOW] [CHANNEL] 0 . 00 °USER 1 ° °STO°REACH 5 [SHEET] [SHALLOW] [CHANNEL] 0 . 00 COKC 7 DAY ° O 0 °CUSTOM 0 °PER°Tc, sum of travel times (min) . . . . T 0 0 0ARE° IG 0 0 °CN °F10Key: QUIT F5Key: CLEAR 0 0 o aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef 0 o SUMMARY DATA 0 °PEAK HYDROGRAPH TIME: 0 . 00 hrs 0 °PEAK HYDROGRAPH FLOW: 0 . 0000 cfs 0 °TOTAL HYDROGRAPH VOL: 0 . 0000 ac-ft 0 o HOME END F1 :Find F2 :New F3 :Get F4 :Tc-Calc F5 :Delete ° o Pgup Pgdn F6 :Compute F7 : F8 :Method F9 :Template F10 :Exit 0 aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef PE\i P ` -rAF OF CoN'c rrR -loN R�Nro N GRow r1 I r. DiZpj-t N pr G E_ C4 vU 5• J . .S P+-5 D \l E oPej Q RA-1 t J P-&E C.Ps•L C-t.)LPt-T10 KILT' ONOON Iii 1 . �•ot& St+e � = 32-9, I s4- sF ww�== w wo .. -7. 5 7 i'r�e.r HE� NCC soL1 2 \ ' 1\ ar- Pro3 ._ " o, m F, me S L- eo oho _ o ' w!( nof- - be c� s rb� �n. c w, I no c trr f-r�b L)te. 0..my .1 mr S c ) LUes'h r,sf ; 6 ZR k 39 ►) 4 k 30) - = 50, !Laar sr 1 ,1 5 ftc--• b) ( ss u ,s4- -f 57� _ 50 C - _� 0 z. Z. - 110 - 2SL2s6) Z ( 072 5f - 1. S(Q , c. h or4 54-v-i.p ; /so 1 = 19,S .S 17 o, f-c. 3_ Pro.. e ' eon _ -7,5? - ( I-,,i5+ 1 ,(3(134o,'4-s) 4.41 F c--1-e s P. cUR\IE NuMBEAs . Total pro3e- — Via.,: 4,( 1 p ;S Z. 1-0-11,-A Imee-r\J10 us sue- 4-e- : G hG= 9f6- \ a.b(e, 3,5,z. EJ :) bud Aln..5 47 , / 5) F - b. ( -, am als'. La, 24-3 SF G wojk.wemi3 : 5)30o 5` d Tb{-ail = I Z() ( ct a s-F = 2 .7 ci /}c . 1 . RENT-0 ow N .s DR'Pr i N. &E B , c u Rva N�mBE (�v-14--) (�L T1 - G� -- f 3,5,z 1 wwww b�ooN o o.�-eon. - 4 , ( o.G‘re s - 2:79 0-e - 132. I nEasi fly (I ) alSa w;r WUU 41 i/iy QC �og< C , T\rn O C�t�c� tTRP-TtCaN REA G C.Ir��l Dr st,, Cc. = 7o s ue' pio w i o fit— ( - ) 6 e..-t,..)e...Qm bk� , F bI� G t -(1 d.VD.). L 70' s\PD, t maw sl of-e_ (98 — Ca Cp = 2- 2 . r.ivN , C see. c erM Putt cp.\ Z . TG Z ,I (L> -7odI I e.. T6W L.z a ' icy o ' pie °,-' .51 re-- = 1-03 - 3� _ 3 5 70 -70 0 , T o.61e. 3,5.2 c T . = , 42 m IY1 C Li 4 3. TG3 c_cLA ID\si L3 = Zoo' 610ci i -=:1 0A s� L 3 = 20 o' c,4\o.sn V-N Q'I 7 Ctros- °y � -TG 3 ,-77 M ih, C see GeNNif. c-o-k. . Tom = TG1 -f Tcz * T I2,Z 3 kYlUtez cRotoNi 3PraSaR D, I IP LS (FrD,t,r). , 3, 5 , E : C - 122. = 2. 10 v\c.Nt3-' SEEK N4NUNFw Wow== PzS - S. 4-- wwii:33 a;8 III 3, cyFAR « Qe F I< D V L.OP W ti see-- C P�fe-y- at-o k Su vvvrvko4-+e.s> i cf-s a,o 2.30 e,Fs aoo = 3, V. DETENTION STORAGE SIZING The site is exempt from detention storage requirements because it has a direct discharge into Lake Washington, which is 1800 ft . downstream from the site . BIOFILTRATION SWALE The biofiltration swale was designed using the King County SWM Manual criteria. The vegetation type within the swale will be wetland type, as allowed in the manual for actual swale slopes of 0 .596 or less . This type of swale vegetation specifies a design water depth of 8" within the swale . The bottom width of the swale was determined using the developed 2 year flow of 1 .46 CFS . The required bottom width was calculated to be 3 . 86 ft . with 3 : 1 side slopes . The swale length will be 200 ft . The velocity at these conditions is 0 .37 FPS, less than the maximum 1 .5 FPS . The swale was also checked for capacity during a 100 year developed flow rate . Its actual slope of 0 . 596 was used. The resultant depth of flow was 0 . 39 ft . , which would be contained by a 1 ft . deep swale . The computer calculation sheets for the bioswale are attached. Trapezoidal Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name : Renton Crown Apts Comment : Biofiltration Swale, Design Conditions Solve For Bottom Width Given Input Data: Left Side Slope 3 . 00 : 1 (H:V) Right Side Slope 3 . 00 : 1 (H:V) Manning' s n 0 . 350 Channel Slope 0 . 0200 ft/ft Depth 0 . 67 ft Discharge 1 .46 cfs Computed Results : Bottom Width. . . . 3 . 86 ft Velocity 0 . 37 fps Flow Area 3 . 93 sf Flow Top Width 7 . 88 ft Wetted Perimeter 8 . 10 ft Critical Depth 0 . 16 ft Critical Slope 3 .4725 ft/ft Froude Number 0 . 09 (flow is Subcritical) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3 . 12 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 Trapezoidal Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: Renton Crown Apts Comment : Biofiltration Swale, 100 year actual flow Solve For Depth Given Input Data: Bottom Width 4 . 00 ft Left Side Slope 3 . 00 :1 (H:V) Right Side Slope 3 . 00 : 1 (H:V) Manning' s n 0 . 030 Channel Slope 0 . 0050 ft/ft Discharge 3 .26 cfs Computed Results : Depth 0 .39 ft Velocity 1 . 61 fps Flow Area 2 . 02 sf Flow Top Width 6 . 35 ft Wetted Perimeter 6 .47 ft Critical Depth 0 . 26 ft Critical Slope 0 . 0222 ft/ft Froude Number 0 . 50 (flow is Subcritical) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3 . 12 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 VI. OFF-SITE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS A. Analysis of Resources: Several resource materials were reviewed for the preparation of this analysis . These resources include: 1. City of Renton drainage maps . 2 . USGS quadrangle topography maps 3 . King County sensitive areas folios . 4 . Engineering plans and reports for previous projects proposed for this site. B. Upstream Off-site Analysis The upstream off-site drainage onto the site is limited to the west and south property lines . The residential lots along the top of the banks along these property lines slope onto the property. The tributary area is limited to the strip of lots between the top of the bank and the adjoining residential street . Most of this runoff is rear yard sheet flow, but some downspout drainage is piped over the bank. This upstream flow is negligible given the small tributary areas . Any upstream flow that traverses the subject site would be intercepted by the proposed retaining wall along the south side or by the existing swale that runs along the toe of the bank along the west side. There is no upstream flows from the north or the east . The existing office complex to the north controls its drainage within its parking lot . Rainier Ave. is along the east line, which is downgradientfrom the site. C. Downstream Drainage The drainage from the site will discharge into the existing 36" CMP that runs west to east within the parking lot just north of the property. 12" pipe stubs have been run onto the site from the existing catch basins within this parking lot . The 36" pipe network is identified on the City of Renton drainage maps as the run from MH 11D5-4 to MH 11D5-12 . The site connection point will be near the latter MH. From this point, the drainage travels east across Rainier Ave. S . for approx: 320 ft . and onto the City of Renton Airport. The piping along this run is 36" concrete and CMP. At this point within the airport, the pipe tees into a 96" x 60" pipe that runs north along the west edge of the airport for approx. 1500 ft . before discharging into Lake Washington just west of the mouth of the Cedar River. • • EMTSD11.XLS . ' MANHOLE AND OUTLET PIPE INVENTORY SHEET 11 The inventory information for the storm drainage system was compiled from numerous sources and is the best information available at this time and should be used only for GENERAL guidance The City of Renton is not responsible for errors or omissions when this information is used for engineering purpose. Designers are to field verify this information. DWN GRATE UPPER LOWER GRATE O/W PIPE PIPE STREAM PLAN STRUCTURE INDEX # TYPE CB ? IE IE IE TYPE SEP. DIAM. TYPE LENGTH STRUCT FILE MH 11,D 4 - 25 MOD4 Y ' - - - C N 96X60 CC - - 13-1-39 MH 11,D 5 - 1 2 Y - - - C N 12 CC - 11,D5-2 4-4-254 MH 11,D 5 - 2 2 Y - - - C N 12 CC - 11,D5-3 4-4-254 MH 11,D 5 - 3 2 Y - - - C N 36 CMP - 11,D5-13 4-4-254 MH 11,D 5 - 4 2 Y 103.4 92.6 81.5 C N 36 CMP - 11,D5-5 CROWN PT MH 11,D 5 - 5 2 Y 99.3 81.05 60.55 C N 36 CC 145 11,D5=6 CROWN PT MH 11,D 5 - 6 2-54. Y 68.57 60.55 53.94 C N 36 CC 228 11,D5-7 CROWN PT MH 11,D 5 - 7 2-54. Y 62.55 53.94 51.76 C N 36. CC 75 11,D5-8 CROWN PT MH 11,D 5 - 8 2-54. Y 60.25 51.76 48.4 C . N 36 CC 116 11,D5-9 CROWN PT MH 11,D 5 - 9 2-48. Y 57 45.72 44.77 C N 36 CC 43 11,05-10 CROWN PT MH 11,D 5 - 10 2-54. Y 55 41.77 37.8 C N 36 - - 11,D5-11 CROWN PT MH 11,D 5 - 11 2 Y 44.7 37.7 29.2 C N 36 CMP - 11,D5-12 CROWN PT MH 11,D 5 - 12 2 Y 37.15 28.68 - C N 36 CMP - 11,D5-3 CROWN POINT MH 11,D 5 - 13 VAULT Y - - - C N 36 CMP - 11,E5-1 - MH 11,D 7 - 1 2 Y 146.7 136 - S N 18 ' - - OUT 17-1-1 MH 11,D 8 - 1 2 Y - - - C N 12 CC - 11,D8-2 2-4-951 MH 11,D 8 - 2 2 Y 91.5 - - - N - - - - 2-4-951 MH 11,D 8 - 12 2 Y - - - - N 18 CC - OUT - MH 11,E 5 - 1 - Y - - - C N 96X60 CC 11,D4-25 13-1-39 ` MH 11,E 5 - 2 - Y - 11.99 - C N 96X60 CC - 11,E5-1 13-139 MH 11,E 6 - 1 2 Y - - - C N 12 CC - 11,D5-1 - MH 11,E 6 - 2 MOD4 Y - - - C N 84X60 CC - 11,E6-3 13-1-39 MH 11,E 6 - 3 MOD4 Y - - 11.9 C N 84X60 CC - 11,E5-2 13-1-39 MH 11,E 7 - 1 2 Y - - 17 c N 24 CMP - 11,E7-4 4-4-254 MH 11,E 7 - 2 2 Y - - - C N 15 CC - 11,E7-1 4-4-254 MH 11,E 7 - 3 2 Y - - - C N 12 CC - 11,E7-2 4-4-254 MH 11,E 7 - 4 - Y - 14.17 - C N 84X60 CC - 11,E7-5 13-1-39 April , 1995 Page 2 S I157H ( S7 �! j if _`� i if 41 ci S 115TH I PL 2 m 11 �� co Itn3=5 1 ' 11. - 11,' - v' .1 �, iLDa • ILJ3- \ ; �-11`A3-3 - • 1iD4-IF ^I7 1I.D4-1- S A 131it ` Ds-L 1 rH ST '0 `ILD41B 11.0044 01-t,1 \.1 MIDI; 13 . .\\ ¢: '.-I- ;--_- - ¢_;-- 1. . i j__.. = IL• 1.�- \•• ILO 22 �Si Y 117Tii f ! ( , . -.--. -- --F�_ ISTI}D 7t ' I ' i I I I I ! I — `=__ !11.0 IIL 5 I• -1LD4 i3 ILL4-2'3 I-.-.L__-__- _ 1 F- j 11 W-6 ` ` HAVTHIIJRNE! Q .- iST °Q / '7= ! ILCa-:1 __ \ 1-,-.1 _i I I _ 1LD4f. BOEING I ihBrH I 's? i -- - ; I d z ! 1 \ ten I Z I I I co S I I --- _ IIAS-l0 an-11 i �, \ . 0 119TH - ILDS ! it=3 < \ / T 111 I I LLD5-7• II., 9 70 J_ I 11 • 1 f II .__ .n5-6020 L1J s 12orH , la I 1105-21 • _ i 1 I I , 1.21 II 11•354 116-51 - II25-2 i t _ ( i Sf I' i�T _ _ 1 i 186-16 1186-18 ILC6-Il 1LC -13 1 11.C6-I6 ___- Z W I1,06-I5A 11.• -1 _ I ! I /� I COI 1LB6-15 0'4LB6-20 1 lL 10 i }tC¢12J I ILC6-U 1I,C6-IS S`( '21TH I 'S`TI 14II5-1 ILB6-14 I,,,6_8 O ( �f II it I �� :3Et6-] ILB6-130 , T l6- ILB6-I2° 1Le6-7 IL _9 O--I1,C6-6 I I I I .1 I RENTUN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT ,�, I I \1LE6-1 t ILB6-I1° !L - lu-ILCe` • r _ NV I 'S T i I ` , ¢ ILC6-4 0 l lB6-10°d„,g .$ 23eL ST La! C 3 i 11,136-4 �....r...�...C6-3, -lI,C6'2 ¢ Z I Z !LE6-2 tBb La l I i \ , 1 6-1 I 11,C8-t Q \ CE 11.36-1 iLB7-9B`_ S 12 RD 3` Li 17 tl,fb-1H _� i Jp 1117 L -i0 1 87-12 ILB7-1 '�ILC7-18 491 , 1 --1 1•-I \\1/4� ° 11,H7-9 11 C7-17 \ E7-3 E7-5 °1L _ T ST T 1 , -13 �' N „ ! 6TH ,1„,_, ST 0 IL 1LC7-11 c7� 11.E it - �� \ O O '� II,07-6 O �L p 9 O p f I f ! r , LLH7-l6 I 14 1L ILC 7-3 I I� I ! II - , 1LC7 B II,C7-6 ILc7-2 ST 11,B7-s 11.B7-3 , - I I ILC7.4 I 6 � 1L07-20 . I I \ , 1LE7-' I I N� I I I I STgTf I1,B7-10 4 1 1 I 145 I !"T - . I 4, \ • R 9iL �_ Z 3 1 \ I _�-; --tr, 1t 6�=z.. I \ - _- NO J ♦ y Z c�i r 9 . 1, ILBB-3° ¢ W i �ILD74 ( 'r ItE7-1 . \ : ' �9 y 7_ISLD7_ 0 SI ,\ 1LB8-2 I i `--1 0 Il,BB-4 '- 1 • 1LB8-1 8-6 .ILC: _._�. •O -1LBB-5 7.y _ _i 1 2* \:4 :l -I. 1 \ 8 1LD8-11 �•• Q ILE8-7 . {` \1 • 1Z- ¢_1LD3 LOB-12 - 1LW-0 1 / l --_ _.. __ _ - -. • ,- ;'Lcs-1 Z - 3 -. �,., 11.78-2 i:.Ea-. CO 7 tce i�— — Z / \ t 1 .. j . yam- o ---- 1 APPENDIX CHARTS, TABLES, GRAPHS FROM KING COUNTY SWM MANUAL • • KING COUNTY, WAS -' ' NGTON, SURFACE VAT DESIGN MANUAL TABLE 3.5.213 SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS • SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type 1A rainfall distribution, 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION AB CD Cultivated land(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89 Wood or forest land: undisturbed or older second growth 42 64 76 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. good condition: grass cover on 75% or more of the area 68 80 86 90 fair condition: grass cover on 50% to 75% of the area 77 85 90 92 Gravel roads and parking lots 76 85 89 91 Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 87 89 ' .Impervious.surfaces,,pav meat,r��o's.��r_. . .-:S -98 g • Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 100 Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 DU/GA 15 • Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA 30 impervious portion 3.0 DU/GA 34 of the site or basin 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA • 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU/GA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 • 7.0 DU/GA 56 Planned unit developments, % impervious condominiums, apartments, must be computed commercial business and industrial areas. (1) For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. 3.5.2-3 11/92 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TABLE 3.5.2C "n" AND "k" VALUES USED IN TIME CALCULATIONS FOR HYDROGRAPHS 'n;Sheet Flow Equation Manning's Values(For the Initial 300 It of travel) n.' Smooth surfaces(concrete.asphalt,gravel,or bare hard packed soil) 0.011 Fallow fields or loose soil surface(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soil with residue cover(s<-0.20 It/ft) 0.06 Cultivated soil with residue cover(S>0.20 ft/h) 0.17 Short prairie grass and lawns 0.15 Dense grasses 0.24 Bermuda grass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods or forest with light underbrush 0.40 Woods or forest with dense underbrush 0.80 *Manning values for sheet flow only,from Overton and Meadows 1976(See TR-55,1986) *le Values Used In Travel Time/Time of Concentration Calculations Shallow Concentrated Flow (After the Initial 300 ft.of sheet flow.R -0.1) k. 1. Forest with heavy ground litter and meadows(n=0.10) 3 2. Brushy ground with some trees(n-0.060) 5 3. Fallow or minimum Wage cultivation(n-0.040) 8 4. . High grass(n=0.035) 9 5. Short grass,pasture and lawns(n-0.030) • 11 6. Nearly bare ground(n-0.025) 13 7. Paved and gravel areas(n=0.012) 27 Channel Flow(Intermittent)(At the beginning of visible channels:R-0.2) kc 1. Forested swale with heavy ground fitter(n =0.10) 5 2. Forested drainage course/ravine with defined channel bed(n=0.050) 10 3. Rock-lined waterway(n=0.035) 15 4. Grassed waterway(n-0.030) 17 5. Earth-lined waterway(n=0.025) 20 6. CMP pipe(n=0.024) 21 7. Concrete pipe(0.012) 42 8. Other waterways and pipes 0.508/n • • Channel Flow(Continuous stream,R-0.4) k. 9. Meandering stream with some pods(n-0.040) 20 10. Rock-lined stream(n-0.035) 23 11. Grass-lined stream(n-0.030) 27 12. Other streams,man-made channels and pipe 0.807/n * **See Chapter 5,Table 5.3.6C for additional MannIngs'n'values for open channels 3.5.2-7 I/90 KING COUNTY, Wd'_ _ HINGTON, SURFACE WA ' -_'R DESIGN MANUAL • FIGURE 3.S.1C 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS 'r----- -r�ei l ' - --=P- titEir--- --- -- '� 1:1 frin 1-L_A,-- N:I' \-\; 1. /# it-, :-4 -:,,.-: vk-. AI II Tilkk '' zoi •-•orr, : •IIE ./AF , • tc:LsItk, , ,.. .... ,,,, .,7- .,.411. mmiii* 1?‘ - 1- Ailisgs . -11110 tivAIN4 VA ' 6-%4 ., is larravoi. ; :I ,_,.ig Apr= miritio, / . cv- , ‘,., ,,,_ 1# /-,:!..„..i.Ainball • ,,,,,f ---1 ,,,,, _,,,,ohitt 1 -tir ---- . 't p ,..., iv, 7.. Ir. Al. ' IN 4 2 _ ..rr , , 01 ./-. \ .... : , .z,..?"'tele.24',.3‘.. .\ '11‘,,.1 ill..... ,,_L:1.:(ii4iiiii:. pillx\ ri= - '1 } - 4,11,118 \ -4970.iti 7.11 .. ....telit, k ff ;±-JVA i - ' -.(01.1 - • fr_4APF1' / . •i --:** \irli Obrg' - RiLiom.:=......... .....• -• -_,...4%.*„.,e, • -ii..SI ,.-tliN .. 1111) IL I P iii...s. 4i,, ; 6ra'—. ---sgalP...1.-- -fti•\ 41- 4111,- - ! i '.. ' '114-Pik .*:. iI:b'°i. NV _ 00.- '4 - -:,, oik \ 4. Vir ‘i :".7.-_ ; itlf - .4147,----- ,p -1,4 y Juiiii,4 , - ,1 i .:')1,42., te---1: ,..0,‘ . ,pirtv. 1 cir mit - , • NO: 411W =. •s 4.1)\_. .., •At..4 /74 • .. -'---.1-0-' .!'- ....A. TO. 14 ...kijilibitr\ \N ,, _ : % • •10 s ''jug iI fi a ' '4.-N- 1-4-ili Viblri riN l --- ,.. ,w-s-Ilk ''' .... 0 .= — . il 1 : - - t _ •:::e. "1'7\i grill Of ' gla ,".. (-- _:::: '-4 \N\b‘ AI -4.1% / , , (A. ,iiiiik, lrilv / ,i LAii:•.= •i ,`, IMIT4 . mil ( • 0.--:",-.7" \k.,,,, : .... • 7 , ' ,E:. _ Cin • • Mil • 'i . itil ,0 •k ( 71114ipto. • . .._. Air qua J•kyp ..... w..- \ ) ,- ..„-_,,_,- •,_ - , ,- :r. ro�l .__. . - ,11-- ...,,,, ,.. , ,1 rak...,10,11/4... ..... . , i : • , L ''''' '“r‘ Pi 54 1 - ; ... _ ialmoWAIN I illti5.AF N Orelli7 NII mg T eti ormwrAima Auk , - 4- • cv •,,, irolid fat amppr,e001, ;.4' ' . h. • lrp.,.. :,) .r--, • : - Atli . ''' i ' ,. N ''''-'• VE301111111t \ , , 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION Itiarf igNin I •.", ,.3.4�' ISOPLUVIALS OF 2-YEAR 24-HOUR (V► atill)MI _ 35 TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES -� ''�� Nify . Arm - I 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a!Miff' � N �✓ / is 300,000 -♦ Air mod- t- ' 3.5.1-8 1/90 • KING COUNTY, WA'r 1INGTON, SURFACE W ATE._•• DESIGN MANUAL U ' FIGURE 3.5.1E 10-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVI..,.....±:,„_,ALS . .\ . ...EL.2.10,1c il,c7 .4444 al• . Ali f ''' ••"..: y' . . . ,y22' \ 14016-4,.... 4 -,. am' / �y , .R.,„. . .,,,..,,,,,_„ I ii*:-) 111 �IFq25 AV • li 26 ./ ''lliaffl .:;1. '-‘--.J% r iinfaw ', _,-fteimi . \I ,1-.44110, A ...: . 7."-N , =-\\ , ...tiori-opw. .t7.-)1' ,,- ,_:.A 0 tritel ,_ illp t 1 . . , (-C, 29 .' PAill"*'' .='. ' ' 'Iti" illibrAt-' W e .„,„„. c:„ ' ...--• ...-- Iv ,. i :.: ,,,.._do.. _ _. ..„, ,s,2.7 i ililiKralk-.• r'' °Pi*" ' , ..,:, . ', tvelikplina ';f :. . 3./ J./ AIN - fit I\ '4.- 1117 .- 911,. . M. sionriivw-4.1111\111Ak_ l I ;041" IjI• .. Nig - i i 2 ,, . \. .... r, . 3.,2 . si T m ‘ wpA i I, (4) raiti-.1-„ Ilk , A,i), \Ott? .,- 7.--4....10.4 '4\1 ' --.\:::..„AliWik ---) • 33 ! ..-. 1 . IL. - _ lip • .. 47- ..1 '.- ' =':. \ao si,. :AIIL*44\tar . c_`. - ,.Il i _Y,.1.. if •Y, ,. ,7 ... ....._. 1m lige / :A P SI - "Vida 4 re t.!3 r' ‘111 - \\:- ' f..- . 'N i N1/41 :Mi I J �• ,.:./.i.,,F rill 77. _ •siv 1 n ) .,c. r., 1, vi r umpa...,:ilik, . 10.---.-: , ..... . . r. di MN . F i , .!.- ,....=lafffini- to"-Iii A, .: , , • / Do mars 1 1 ' 'k- . _ .... lgitilik VOW irl 10-YEARAlt .,.. fill.17/41.001V l* • ---.. -. - ' \.^. 2 1,13"alara /LW"' .11111...ir.AMMAllik„ , _ , 11... illt isaviffirkw --4•. __. ,A tei • r . , - . . 4„, le..,,,, riaN7FoorwfT4,1 .g• i• tii ilk\ v a,...... ..3_ folo, , . . awl iii , ,,, ,, . . . ___._ P.v..r. ._.___, .. Nvems, li )1 ., , 0 Mr \. . dd . 24-HOURI .�e � PRECIPITATION �q , �A►► sot .o,,M4V 3.4� ISOPLUVIALS OF 10-YEAR 24-HOUR A��'r kill TOTAL: : : RTATION IN HES 3. N �-� '3' et illippwrt.-, ,.c 0 1 2 �� ` 1:300,000 3.5.1-10 �3y I/gp - 4.0 , KING COUNTY, W A S H I' . J T O N, SURFACE WATER ---- SIGN MANUAL �_/'' • FIGURE 3.5.1H 100-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS go,_____ : ..L...,_rlion.iir $;,Ai .1_i4m.g. ,,,,t. ,,. ..,,u-___.. , ._ _._._.3 ._. ctif.-- ---- --(7-- ------— ---- Ali;FATA apmett. ... i v-N..„_, p ., A�.4 ,...;, �� .v 2m,.0 ',i ,ilk_A -.: ) "It t 36, 1 - all5- MI el aiiqi lit , _mitftwfts\ vokamomm - AN iii% . ,, awir_. 400, 3.'Se. '. igragaritAlEretaight .9! ;,-- i 141 ) 10 1 Wit t bilar.1/4113P waren_ y 4 ' r."4111111fir . . t, II . i , _ " ,kw.47� ,.,- , -f` isr � ig 9/4 4 klilr:"..4.' 4- - -\\' elL ii,VACII :: 4.3 ) ,.s.-- ..k..41.1.014, . ,•Aiter, 1...4,-,..... ..,*.) . 4.n0.0, / 44 ...�� •- F, �x� ` "q - -Yr i:u,-ion eir A. • i � • co ii‘ ' - 10-0•1140' . s ,-.(1.c •r Is ls. 4:131POillkda .. '3'brid ) d I , .00- - . wm - 4.: A 46 . ) 1 INIVAVU 1 i I . /.11A1 - ‘14.4( 4011117: , A ,•-• ,Olivill;i14,_. 44114: \ v Ar . 1"4'. Itieitc•orp - pig ..-di , v 44441111110-$.1kib , . la -1 — -- "\ it* . t il Illh,. Ili iikriallteSilk tiZ0 � :,Air � l 8 : \ , . E .� yk _ -- , i Ifin -i.;...---'' - • OR AO . .--_. i, ANS i ,..- •.- _ 4'r. li.i A-- _ -: _.---. i golimilt '. :II' PAD IIMI : 4 1 Vmil /./ ( Wilit' ':% IP Mir Mad - l& Oat" qt - ,,jkiitral ' p' i,1N-k4 Ira 101 1 i / . '''' 6%114 1114"Ell I I liP 1 _±__41101tifiLY Allikt --i f.,, t-` i ... lA� ` �� `aperoi i / cam'- y. .7\-- -- . . .-.\ ..,Airgliii irite 4. _ file - 9A.,,. 11/ •• •� . WW1 frat miumwoisa. ,..4 N . ,, .. ., ‘,. 4 1 - .. 4 •.e. ._:_._._ .A. i iii o, a dato '4e i - _ , • li ...! irit . I, ) • tv 3co , 100-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION VIZEIFIV •.,, 6.6.." •3.4 ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 24-HOURNI'% raterr.R TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES O►� �� •� 1► iir 5.5 0 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 Mlles • �43 ,�—� 3.5.1-13. • 1:300,000 yO , 1/'90 : KING COUNTY, WAS , NGTON, SURFACE WATT DESIGN MANUAL o The velocity of runoff through the biofiltration swale or filter strip for the maximum conveyance capacity design flow rate (see Core Requirement #4, Section 1 .2.4) shall not exceed 5 feet per second. Design Flow Depth o Biofiltration swales shall be designed using a design flow depth at the biofiltration design flow rate by assuming a winter design height of vegetation as shown in Table 4.6.4A. TABLE 4.6.4A DESIGN FLOW DEPTH BY TYPE OF VEGETATION Type of Vegetation Winter Design Height Design Flow Depth Urban (lawns) 3 inches 1 inch Rural (natural areas) 6 inches 4 inches Wetlands (wet areas) 10 inches 8 inches • Design Process Biofiltration Swales 1. Compute the biofiltration design flow rate. 2. Determine the preliminary route and actual slope. 3. Compute the bottom width of the swale based on the proposed vegetation type and side slopes (3 to 1 preferred). 4. Check the velocity at the biofiltration design flow rate (Ignore the check dams and use the actual swale slope). If in excess of 1.5 feet per second, re-design the swale by decreasing the • actual swale slope, stepping down the slope by dividing the swale into segments, or increasing the width. 5. If the swale length must be less than 200 feet in length, compute the surface area of the design water surface at the biofiltration design flow rate and widen the shortened swale to provide an equivalent surface area. 6. Use the conveyance capacity maximum design flow rates and establish the required swale depth to provide adequate freeboard. 7. Check the maximum velocity in the swale at the maximum design flow rate (Ignore the check dams when computing the maximum velocity.) If greater than 5 feet per second re-design the swale by decreasing the actual swale slope, stepping down the slope by dividing the swale into segments, or increasing the width. Filter Strips 1. Compute the required width of the filter strip by calculating the length of of tributary unit area of impervious surface per one foot length of strip and multiplying times 0.23 feet. 2. Determine the preliminary design of the filter strip. 3. Size the swale at the toe of the filter strip to convey the maximum design flow rates from the area tributary to the filter strip. 4.6.5 COALESCING PLATE OIL/WATER SEPARATORS Coalescing plate oil/water separators are used to effectively remove oil and grease from surface water. They operate by using differential gravity separation of particles that have a different density than water. Particles of higher density than water (such as sediments) will settle down to the bottom, while particles with a lower density than water (such as oils) will rise to the top. Once separated from the water column the particles of interest can be removed. The most effective separator designs employ a series of parallel inclined plates that shorten the distance particles have • 4.6.5-1 11/92 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA ( Reprinted: 03/20/96 13 : 13 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9601189 Amount : 2, 549 . 92 03/20/96 13 : 13 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: RENTON CROWN 03 Init : JB Project # : LUA96-038 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Location: RAINIER AV S AND S 119TH ST Total Fees : 2, 549 . 92 This Payment 2 , 549 . 92 Total ALL Pmts : 2, 549 . 92 Balance : . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 2, 000 . 00 000. 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 49 . 92