Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA97-051
CITY OF RENTON 0 cD\ , . „. seet,Le 41 ..„ Planning/Building/Public Works v . o IP 6.. , cc z,,, Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 a APR 1 rg 1 idi co . E g . PIIMETEA - , la: . :. • 71.58182 .IL-S.'POSTAGE., :.,,i- :. . ,v. 739890-0760-06 TAKAHASHI . I SA0 . . 531196 11645 SE 20811-1 . 1f.1 KENT " WA . . --- .4_____—_:________ I - 'MOT DELIVERA8i •':-.----7-"---'--, . ,,, ---4-1 _ ADOP.ESSE21 ...t._ 1 I.: / 13LE: TO FOB VA BD . ,.....4 • . ... ild - . i i i i i ' iii 1 VI il 11 .'.. I. -''' '-' • ..S.42 i:).:B 1.7-VeAtT•••7:2:?." -:1. i'f'• 7-37-Y itliiIIII!!!!iilliiliiffidiiiliiiii!ililiiiiiiiiliiEilin • S•rcY 0 GA N • NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION i. RENTON, WASHINGTON li An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight (8) dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site.Plan Approval . .Building Permit - _ ' The application can be reviewed in,:tte; Development Services Division:.located;on the third floor of Renton City Hall. ' Comments will be accepted anytime prior to the Environmental Review_:Committee-(ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings;or prior:to an administrative decision::For futher r information,on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY, OF.,;RECORD----and!;receive additional, nofifcations;.-.,by,:-:mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the,ipublic hearing• date(s): for_ this' project; please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for,proper file identification: v t /.5.4 , w: ?.. - __ dr. II G` °' ;' SE 18thi II � i ® I,I H c, 0 t • a lid WO 4 • it 1 ' . 4 , 4c„, %., .-:,. �3;llIriee�=� 02 nu l"+ I �011,011\\ ..- 4S: ii■ =ii fiii !' , . �� 1n _ns ■■ ton ■s -= 1t ire' '' E dl:i ST, ;--..-: -.; :'2, '; i. ",.:?;•.!-. - ftt ,'i - - / I ► '`S'F.' 6:4th` .,T. �. ,+c,">.' . I:,. I '' : , iA:7�_. :'dFp;i.'.j:'' ,, . :':,` II �1'-': i5;.2Zth'ST,:, . '111' .. a i,; '0' .. �� " , _ :_,. _ _ _ A- n r 1 JN,pI� ,w _r MA GENMALOT.DOClit v'A _ _T sas * _— �, �� I E18t1 - a 0 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works •-i. 0.1. - ' ' 4 '' -44 It'' 6.,. .,,J Mill Avenue South - Renton,Washington 98055 cz L 0 TefiliA • co t•- APR kl0 2 9 8'9 T 2103:02 E 0 CC cc U.S.u s. POSTAGE * 1 7135 METER 1 " - * -- ' r". 44--. ,......----- %1 ----- ii D 739890-1290-03 Vk DAVIES JOHN W+JEAN 2020 GRANT AVE S . 103 309999 5 5 oto re, , RENTON WA - - 98055 __ .- - - - - - --- •-•.._. - - DAVI020 980532008 1796 23 04/21/97 NOTIFY ,seNaeR—o EW ADDRESS L6a/ -'41.-\ VIE BRIAN 11 101 T DEUVERABLE c-::;:z.,_. fi li541 E 27 UNIT ; ,› AVIA io ! KENT ADDRESSED _ co luusLE TOF RWARD r--- ift, I co cp iflci• Z . LP:ETURP TO SENDER - '.-13A6r..1S- • if,22... ecitl v.z.r-11 ILItilillitilinillishliiiititttili-tsltitilillinliiimilli ------• ,----! .\ ' _J • Ivo !II I 111 11 i 11 1 CNt.11,1 I I \ : • - - -- - - ---.....- - kaU + MOIR4 + ''NTO NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: - --RENTON HEIGHTS.RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT_/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8) dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive PUBLIC APPROVALS:. \ Environmental Review . ..,,. ... ,t Site Plan Approval _ ...__ ' Bu ilding Permit The application can be:reviewed ' ',in Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted;anytime'prior.,to the Environmental.Review Committee (ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or:prior to an administrative decision. For'further information:on the application, or if you wish to I be made a PARTY OF-RECORD and' receive additional notification s,;..by..:.mail, of the City's environmental 1 determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for.proper file identification. 1 ,a) cz,- 43.4 t Ns A al " Om N Me*4* ,.....,,e14 cp., * SE lath Ivo .. it.,. a \, o ri -♦• •1 g A�i �♦ ♦/j #c' lb . tit0 )k.\\ aIir ���O1C4' 1 ll 1 illk ---\ - eet ;i4; ralAtip \ i Q�♦��' . I 1-(R-Fil 1 e ii tr;:,2,,. :. ::: - '',':'. ir, ..! . /'- k 1,0 , .• . �,,:, -.2 •._ �. n ,_• `r ..i -:, .•.1 , ter•. ' ; . .. .,.... sit i . . ,52-7th-si: 1 1_ ---\\ • • - .. - ' ' -- -- , NrIztkiiiiii' -7 1 47-A t 0 tri . - 1. — . w ---=-Le,-; - i! IIN lif 1:7 III '-' ----::::. lill GENMALOT.DOC \ ��� �, �=II i" _tr:_ _ - �.■ ■ _ N1.111 F 8t1 eIR CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works .... ...mmommem•I , • ,t, V,4 'si,i•*A•444=40 alltel° 4 • II; — „ ..--. * 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 I a: • 0417/4)li.1,4 * o 4- w •-• APR t 8'97 n= E fop$410 2 9 5 * u, 0 cc is ti PB METIER * NO SUCH II A.1 IIMP rED UNNOWN 7158/82 U.S. POSTAGE : ...... I NSW:"F. I C I E NT A D D R E S S R EUS PD: 144 (ADEL AS SHOWN UNABLE• TGFWD...... • VACANT .3\ICI.A ROUTE tfl--"1 I N I rI I Al S •01.---- 8658-N 5 ... P 5 ,. 739890-1130-07 -4117)0 Cit I L Tr210SCRHAC147" Fl 19 AVEV sr, VL1n5 999 RENTON WA 98055 . . .•‘!--7',.-.7". DELIVERABLE LA S ADDRESSED t'.›,-.UNABLE TO FORWMiD `tc5), Vld RETURN TO SENDER - A et 0 r • 15fiVaSCAS il)c..1 iiiiitlilldimilitttilimMitillliiiilLilinlimiiihi m 71n, , • iliFit + i' 'NTl NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL.APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. T e following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight (8) dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive , PUBLIC APPROVALS: : , - ,Environmental Review, -, : . - Site Plan Approval -. UildIng�Permit� -- ! � __ _ , The application can be reviewed in_the;;Development Services Division'located `oii:the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted`anytime prio'rto'the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, d I ring Public Hearings, or prior to•an administrative decision. '.For;further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF..:,RECORD and receive additional notifications, by; mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal. periods and/or the public hearing' date(s) for, this• project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the,project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. 1 1 pi cZ,s,454 i , • -. 'M IC cl rn (13 Op SE 18th- i•°iii ads :1 Ire t /041 0 LP 7,.,, to kill Wi'���`tt" 1 tel likPuttinIabs. ♦ �S4� ." CI .;sii 0**II. eglitoiiihi..1 4 .1 pi ea ul 1 I n - win-v■■ ■ ■■■ . 1 t ' 5 liAtpilk Iqr \ r . -, + ... .. _fir,. •� -�:. ... ' ,,;::• ':. , .c,, i, n - .r lbS.. . .• !ii)..4.t_h_i-\\•ETT 4-, :•,;:',:: .;;,,,:..,-, :_ . .•,.,'.. :• r_ :_--,,:-,1.;:c.zi cl:',:' : ,i-T tl , •� ( S 27th ST '� 1 111 -_ V - 6 'mall Cl: t :.r ., 11 =;,_ GENMALOT.DOC Z _ 1 D. . _,_,_r_. _ -= _ _ .._ -• ---J..... • — , CITY OF RENTON di ,-- ,,L.- v ,,,,:,,,444.-,,....-04.--,-----'---t-H, ,.. Planning/Building/Public Works _;,,,)"Mill Avenue South - Ixa Renton,Washington 98055 CA , '4-. •rein 4 - Co * co fr - API i wig a • 5 , agg a- . ssm ...= 0 2 9 ... • ,.: cc s • - PB METER • mom ..11.L.POSTAGE ** •• : .: Kt) t7 tiTc, 4IE V). 4 _ __ __ 73,890_0.0o-08 VAtigENBaS CHERY L.. zi 98055 1 \ I uELIVRArTh—c- --- 2R0E21.4,0LVr :AVE 1,010 ----A- ____ 1 ADLIPEYSED 4,- a )21.F I() F 0 R',','A ND • p,-REIURN,1.0, W.RiTER . . 1,1 : . ,.,,,w.‹,— ..els,stv:72.47.--..a.P..7. • ' iiihiliddiciiitiiiiiiialfitillillisittitilli.j11.,-".11-1.1 ... . — ...._. . . . „ ) ti(SY O GA ni Nfr NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. T e following briefly describes the application and The necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) dyIplex buildings. There would be a total of eight (8) dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive 1 PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review - •_ _ Site Plan Approval : . '."' . r-: :_ Building Permit -- . The application can be�.reviewed in'the Development'Services Division:=located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime•,prior to;the`•Environm'ental'Review Committee.(ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings;or;prior.to an administrative decision.: For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF 'RECORD- and; receive additional notifications,: by {mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or 'the' public hearing' dates) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. G C, SE 18th' `Orli Me 4 4, H ., •-1 c-f �� 3 7,,,, ' . 4 o� Ilk k :'oy w l> 47 W t ,'' PI/Grano riblFre . .101$0 _• 1 12�aa �ail 1 ,f, II:4t\V—) \- lir- i4 - • .1• St .ii:r ;'T i , }. ig141°91 rH.-F (4th ,r I o n *NM - W =___ �r ---- -111 _t-L,,-__ .: ft r``\$tV - 1111111a.-- . . . 1,-,..,:,'.r:•;..:i.•.;..-,''.f'.:. 1;.-..1• -. • ..-0:. L......L.. I• M I I ; rOrt L r sr R 4 E I 1 . z . „I --A— - ...r...00 • 1. Ho A v s".... SrA.::.....:. , Ll 1 Z i r• Av r• 1 • — 1 . . . .LE L.. .v..„ s. — . 1 . 111 AV I FRWY : (-) ,...L......, .). , ,,,, I 7 c,', ...sm., ,:-: ., t . t‘,11.1- SrAT/uCK Z 1 fiiY S T " 8 . .:, +orfrearldt NOPR S AV S. "04Th 4V i At . I i 1 ;..Cgicsirrliril AV S 7.. — ' :Sr 1 'VS C: . k --I . 0"., 41:It:I :-.r.---- t•fr• 1,—; i i i L71' ', Ig : ‘ < ' • r',., • 1,4 '. : _, : ' SI'.7-.Tv...$0r P,.,,• -•—— .--' .. . .lii-ii....1;1•421,45- ''...5-t-r-- -.7 '''I''.-e-- ....-- -'--------- :i :••'''...':. t" 1 ' ws%..)°,„44 14643 2 _ - r,'"u I :: 'q•i••••. SE g_ -; •,,,, CEDARs AV'15 AV SE i ....! 1 6* ,.S, -' A. " st .,,,i," .i sk_RENTON AV S iGy AV SE 1 Ili ' GANT 'R 'AV S '... • S C..-• 4 " ": .' ibiAl Amt.._ 118111; .. N' s..ri..1•1 •••,ri i - . 0 . ', •,....c,.. ,.., -15•'''/ 7 = • tr Av St g .4 a erics ;A: 4 ":;;Wr.i.I"", •..S jorcaLo &L re"in TN Av SE IA -. "I 7 ' j t:moat.cv tit yt V -(1 %...... - ...11...._ . I 9 0-791212 9004 \i ' \ "'�), fl Z it ��O v. \ \ \ ' LOT I ,\I L07 2 N \ \Z• q'S�\V1 \`I \\ ;' \Oi' it 4G P'e p I" 1 • PUGET ,DRIVE a ,..,..T... \\'\ ,.L.�' \' s�� '• nuld�m"� ER ..... r R [MY VioEIiNE EON. ,/o~ `h••D~ � \.\ i ..•� m I r a Q\ SOVTN SfATTLE T.°.9 �\ „ v •l a 11 SI3'GZG `. +., \ 3`. 7u �~ • NSET foalcorm. .v�.�' - - e �C PPMPSE nyplr,9L.°/T!-E° •NN\ \4 ` .... c • ` m c�v` r e� o m R ,... (k py o n 9 S ?� \� \ 'ybgc \ \ '' fs c �J 1 of,tot''' \ \• °o \c �So• °e 0E - + P a ..r.• t r�"\ .0le' °°j0' v SEC.20,T.2° N » 20,OR RS/ON 6 TKENLN(TYP 3 pG9 GE J -k• q . 0eGsoE - 8 y I / r BEKDe nAiTND B b wR rSz( K E' C 1 i r i __ s _ g [Or 29 EK. I,' IaYE PNRK/N�__-_ ca, cc \� of IH-p--- Ni FSB _FFw9-' \ I ?I6 + / {--J ' I 4:Z R EFFM ______ _ 1 .. . I TeE' I I� (n Ef,.DRAW PAE R/ES 901,R/1/0 _ _ \I 4�—y-A - l/�* oNB arov TOE REMOED FesoresSTE,TO " i t, / . 'I A /T55,9 P,rFPGL Ps APPROVED/ BY THE LT a // .7 04 .W . g QI 3V • // /v OW l • W b ° am%e•r, • `,5 h '`p1 � >© CI � ? O/ // ho -9� • z• d ,Q ;;C'; -r�rai'N .- + 'O / s yF9 _tFF 9E _'; N Go �E F - CZEAN-0(?�_Y A:. RD a 0 ,or- NTS. 4 O RiP RaP I _ t L - E:. OBPLEX a� V!F Ti.,:` I " �e�FGeP.s r B Total square Footagepf Sf a: �:-. s S fools Boot u9 L_ ( .. � .r._-•:� I_ H BtOLKS Square 1st Boor= 0 0 'a'at i�r'�ea y • seaLef Y r T .and floor 6 Q E F- J 9 r . .- ( '/. 6 jg%u E j -Total footage= E. 3< sr Genre I %/ '�£ .; s 39B- Percentage of lot covert "'-'Z = p +i�/u o Ism Parking spaces __ J89`o5"Ss"w I I rrNE -Compact=0 U�' I I s / Ez sE E -T s R,D.w -Full sine=8 I w e STNBS.�19 t,' S foots of lands, c€ I i R/rro Square-Interior parking g 1 n ) , -AB other pa �vFt.li gyg ...� .... waeK Budding height `�� Pze9/S 111 1 r.to `xrsT a _ -Allowable-330 sysy r Be • eo t �c w I `v '�k w 1./e 10 Building setbacks Peru o! -Side'yards=2 I w av If At— 'aw -ron ws -ad( < a P U G E TD R_ 'i I. 11 • Y. 1 . eLK eE • �+ '�© 'ti �� /'� /n s v'F. Is , e 1'j a @' .ti3:: �.•f t - nawi in°owcauRe ° p CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works � "�"" ° '` 200 Mill Avenue South-Renton, Washington 98055 • co N VI 1 8o97 ti gal .-Z.-9 S W Ca / �" y • a.6 rD METER :; 71 58782 U.8. PG,B'T GE * rqv ROLLING HILLS CONDOMINIUMS - ;„ : aS 5J1570 «: C!O PROPERTY CONCEPTS INC _ . 600 1ST AVE t626 �- EEL.°s'i'ERABLE t•:- _� —` $Za i1PCi-1ESSED E$'.r s 5 9 N / BL E u F OR�ii P F3 .,--- 3$ W `� j F i }J 9Ur{ii T^ SENDER T� ,a iiiy.` ri 1•4. 4,� rarer 1!i! 1iE�i' IESiI;IEE�t�fiili�El,i�l1!IIf�1�E31tE[1��1ti33�ii� _r , a NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8) dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 blockiof Puget Drive 1 PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit - , The application can be:reviewed in the Development Services Division located:on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted..`anytime,!prior to the:Environmental Review-'Committee:(ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior toan administrative decision. ;For;further information;on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY' OF,, 'RECORD---and? receive additional, notifications, :by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the i public hearing, date(s) •fori this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when c\--c-'' 'f( s 16'14 47 1 •, ia,:O' :fk.:io.4_Ri1r,,t dua-ltt alling for,proper file identification. G (, SE 18th' :Zip ili n V' :4 -... IA • 14P 4* e, Pu Ein.:NW YfM ...0.0411e gii==1- S • n .� Z=1 aain ■■inII • 1( \ 1 it VA* , 1 • . '-- . ' ` ' , ' Oro A , . , , ._,, ,_ ,:..,,, , , , i ,E., .,,-2,,_d_ s, . . : ,... _. . ;'I.::,:;:',....:, 'll ' ; -:, . . to; , . .... : : ..: i , ., .. 4 . . 1 _ :...z 1 :., 4 . ..:..• :-....:, . :: , _},:.,-.:,,-., :..,., 2,: t4, '' ''.._ .'t J'F 64th '.T .-r . . :J ,:,' ;, '',3" f, i • ^�Ilt . ling as \. --= = _' - . . . u ... . - ... _.. V _ litt-t 0 . ,,!,,,. ,_. ., ,..,.., _..,_ -Nr.gti. — .-. , — ____,,,_ , or ,:-.: Vi9 Ill' . •1 1 1111 — z- GENMALOT.DOC LV IIr = - -_ _ _ ati a © CITY OF RENTON 'a Planning/Building/Public Works Ili ; • 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 W yI{PQ 18"!IZ �' 0 2 9 5ex ppp�0. W i Dl4E1E a• • 713878V.s. POSTAGE ; i 739890-0310-01 HARRINGTON K P ti GANN J L E0,081 2020 GRANT AVE S 11C-101 - RENTON WA 98055 HARR020R 98055'3005 1N 16 04/19/97 RETURN TO SENDER I,66/ NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE NSUFFIC EN1 UNABLE TO FORWARD i;�V £Z RFYI IPM Yn .f-.FNnPr/ ADDRESS d'6' ETUF N TO JL.I�OFF.-4 ��- Y , .,, : 1,1�1'1f„swi'►"�IIt,1� ��tAld oc IIii'.11it1f1l{IifiiIiiiiiiliiiiiiiiiilliilit'iililitliiiiiiiiii 7 Y Oti O� A { NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. I PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DgVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight (8)dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive (PUBLIC APPROVALS: . .• Environmental Review Site.Plan Approval - - ' Building Permit .._.__.... . The application can be .reviewed in,the:Development Services;Division located;on'-the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime;prior toithe Environmental Review.Committee (ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings; or prior to an administrative decision. For;further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OFI RECORD and receive additional, notifications,' 'by.'mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal ,periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. , ry �✓�� , (.,, L tit). 1`ill �P S1i�h j _ _ ;_ ..... u„r fn =A, SE 18th •LO� h ■�i�®��r4\ ti % 11'4 kkiw, e ••44.9( p�/�i �� e1�,.1 0 . IA mow....weir 4 4 __! agotiviiarum , 1 g if tlk --%. :.40J11 MIS in fin t-Y \A \*.i . 1 i i idler 1 - _. , _. _ .' i • E J a�.r�d' ST � , , ; '---.77-u-7 r :: ..'..i: ri I ,.� r, _ , , i : :: _, . .. Sie , '.,E 6,4th .fir, .- c: .. . .•-•,,, l‘ci , • .: S 27th,SJ, „ ii 2 _Li_ .,_ , ,_.‘: „... , ; , 0� w w _S _La. 1 -- GENMALOT.DOC _ ' 11 -- _ r a 0 CITY OF RENTON - • 4,4......q.„,1„;:e_,.....,.....—...r. ,,, .4. Planning/Building/Public Works _ : 07 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 i at: c :' of- - i APR i 6'91 !.•Afical - u 2 9 2 . . ta G.ta. P8 METER • 1.--7451782 U.S. POITA E : -.., 739890-0520-07 - ,, --- --4 -— - -s: -_ VASS ARLENE J . i 2020 GRANT AVF S 1D-3" 432911 VA55020 980552008 iN 23 04/21/97 RETURN TO SENDER ....,...-.. 3. (3.ssi NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE 1 1SUFFICIENT „c--;:-:::-:---____A-1 6:.ii a I UNABLE TO FORWARD ..-- I ( DDRESS c..,,,,f: _II ------ (Aid ! .•.TURN TO SENDER ' z-- - t vs 51Aisr..3=.3.-.-cames rs;:. II I hill!NIL IIIIIiiiiiiiilhiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiliii ---.-- ti(CY O . ,i-IR 4/- NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON , An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City:of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight (8) dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive PUBLIC APPROVALS: - Environmental Review Site Plan.Approval . Building Permit : • The application can be:reviewed in_.the:.Development:Ser,ices:Division. located on the third floor of Renton City Hall: Comments will be accepted anytime;prior to the En,vironmental.Review Committee (ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative-decision.,'For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY ;OF RECORD and,, receive additional notifications, by ',mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or.the! public hearing date(s) for thisproject•, please contact .the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. afi I unit. oer-- �� �VS/6-16,/ SE 18th' `1po xI=iv 4�,ti � .. •tetrilferl• .. i �l,• a At ` woe ti, r • E 22& ST 1II �. 1 ill lik tegaitoolfolighi..; 1 kali :Ili i Mil " 1-( ' 1 4.1140jala lr ' , .ir---- • i ' • ;. - ♦ I rill : �f ... s ill la y -i 6 • II 1 - - r ,. ' . , IMI , GENMALOT.DOC : II - 1& — _- [8t1 - a 0 CITY OF RENTON , _ _ -, fouit _,..........., ,,,, ea Planning/Building/Public Works 4,. - cijw, 1- —4— • ,... A - : Ix • 111711:•01 . 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton,Washington 98055 o ‘•-• CO 1•••, APE 1 8,9 T AMA — 0 29'5 " ma. fac.1 PB METER IP * * . 7158782 IV-' : ,' r,, -- -• ,-,' - - -- - - ----- —---- , -739890-0950-06 I FRANK THERESA 169999 — 2020 GRANT AVE S i1J-103 RENTON WA FRAN020 980552008 IN 23 04/21/97 ____ RETURN TO SENDER I NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD 1 - - - '\ _ - - ,--- S•6i-SSAF..X*Pr24471:73 r4:: litlithihniiiiiiiiiiiii! isidiltililthilliiiill'itidlii 1 I • C�ti�Y O� i_li. , .; -4 .-r\r--W)64 NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: ' The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8) dwelling units. 1GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive , (PUBLIC APPROVALS: . Environmental Review Site Plan.Approval -_- Building.Permit. -= -. The application can be;'reviewed -in,the'Development Services'Divislon_located:or,=,the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to the Environmental'Review'Coriim'ittee=(ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative decision. For,further information on the application, or if you wish to .be. made a PARTY OF RECORD and, receive additional' notifications,' by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal 'periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. is ,,, SE18th: ` iHi ai ilii 4W#it 45,4 r4 0ki i t t> " 00 e• %IL Clf. I IS V 4 PO r Fp It gpsolieptiargil a o ♦4/' r: _A MI 41 4,.. MN ■■ NON In ' 11 _ Zug • _--- .*it \ .1 : • • 'E ,(font T I'l- : :-'''. - ,: .; •'• . \ VA, .: ' ,_ ).- :VIII = s2nh'ST:'. ..11.n 1 II_ .f,.�i .,...., , , - . .. . ,- vi GENMALOT.DOC II_ _ CD - — I 1 8tls IIIIIMIW""MIMMMMMIIIIIIr":1MMIP".rll...IIMIMIMI"Mlr, A d a CITY OF RENTON - LEI, isYr• .....,Y i - -+� Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 a L, %";;� .. V API 1 6V1 s •a1 `.. 0 -g s' ��pp w Q.w P®HEM 7151782 .U.S.Pail.TAG E :- .. 739890-0810-06 - - --- ---- GOLDBERG STEVEN M+MARIANNE 039999 2020. GRANT AVE S. G201 --- --- ---- - - ------ - RENTOt�J-.WA - -- - 1 GOLDO20 008 1N 29 O4/21/97 --- �.�-.._ ----I RETURNTURN TO SENDER I NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD /' 3S0-s.s4.3_'" 1,$3 1-3'' iii'ifiiiliiiifiiiiiifliifiilijlfflLlfifitfill7iiiiiiini i i ma , , oCilet ,f,t NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION , RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The.applicant.seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) rJuplex buildings. There would be a total of eight (8) dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review I Site Plan.Approval.:._: : .-.. : : • (, _ Building Permit` - - ... • . ,_ The application can be-reviewedin the;-Development:IServices;Division Iodated on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to'the`Environmental,Review,Committee (ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings; or prior-to an administrative decision. For.further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY' OF- RECORD and receive additional notifications, .by.;;mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal :periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please incluy\s'k 4,),„de the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. ti _ az gis rigrifr. cn C, 1 SE 18th'1 :ii� I ittfr 4 ♦ -- 7: t‘40) 9 svots 0 gr 4 k g., „ AP 0,0,4*, 0 Nk. . a ill -di, sp4.1," PuzintESOP .1011�0_1 ar ail = g �.t _ 4g8i f■■ rifair ' • eIAi 1a NO I an ■ • I Tip. ma •X tit, ti, �E fi,4fh; . 1ik 1 II W w =S_ ... _[1- ow :� ,_ .‘441,111 -.,- ----;75." - GENMALOT.DOC \- 2 `!j11ç _E CBtI © CITY OF RENTON -= ' - Planning/Building/Public Works - �.. ``a vi, `:i 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 APR i 8`9 % = 9 A. PB MET EA * 7158782 U.S._ POSTAGE. s is • - - ; - 739890-1O00-04 • MAKOWICHUK WESLIE .A : ' C1279 2020:GRANT AVE S J204 -- -- _ - - -_ _-- -- - - ---_ __ ---- -- RENTON WA f r MAK0020 980552008 1N 2B 04/21/97 -- - RETURN TO SENDER NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD I - — —�— — o J (! t i `�-Pj rjs h.W2S•Y2.2.y.+ .z." . JIiiiIiiil!illmfiIiiifiiiiSiill EliiliiiiiI�allilIIISiIII'il '1 9\, / U A • IiiiiR + bin NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON !An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA.ECF 'DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight (8)dwelling units. 'GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval , ; .Building,Permit --- -- The application can be reviewed in(the,Development Services:Division AdOetedi on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted'anytime prior to the Environmental'Review Committee-(ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior'.to"an administrative decision. ;For information;on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF"- RECORD and I receive additional; notifications, by.'.:mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal 'periods and/or the public hearing' date(S) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. �yes SE 18th m :�iso i� d p 4 '° ■■ �♦ Ill :60 1,4 k =oyw �� ♦ �'i►� At � � Ov . •3004dlitiffinfl • rI a =i■ r ■r " , , S%lila 1 .. Ludin_u_61( Ili i: rc:' : „t_N!,‘•,; .,:Jq.:_,-,7_, , t • . , _ _ a tif . . _ • I 7. 64th T' , - ,. T , -.Lt ;.t • . um S;?7hS . E. ;, ;; , S ' . _� — 1 I ( li , —z ..GENMALOT.DOC = "■ P �_ F 8tlr a © CITY OF RENTON - Planning/Building/Public Works ''.f"- `;� `'"t tr. ,' 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 , � :� 0 Q ; ,•'7158782 .0.9. POSTAGE ; 739890-1080-07 COLE 'REBECCA L 622002 2020 GRANT AVE S K204 RENTON WA -- - s - -- -- _ OOLE020 980552008 1N 25 04/21/97 _ RETURN TO SENDER NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE • UNABLE TO FORWARD ! , ` ''3ac •Is3tis , sLi.?js o`..', Ifffl ilIlIIEudduliJ Jla1:i!tIhdad lluaIUHIItd -. i 1 , COC-Y rl 1 41*• .f NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON 1 An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight (8)dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive I PUBLIC.APPROVALS: Environmental Review 1 , Site Plan Approval I . - Building Permit. .. The application can be:reviewed in-the'Development,Services-Division°located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. ' Comments will be accepted anytime,pnor.to the Environmental;Review Committee(ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, _ during Public Hearings,,or prior'to'an'administ'rative.decisiori`:For further information on the application, or if you wish to. be made a PARTY OF ;RECORD and receive additional .notifications, by,: mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) ;for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. yc.ss, S ' and1e u2s" c1SE � Q ffa�n n 18th : ii� 4 -23 ■6,i )6,4 k tut.w .., I •� /1t(■ 04.4,, toi . .44 eih PtiGE/AN ;S► . 4 4 4 Qli 9011s'� elinif ui==1:.1 ts to • �i■ _■. ■■ L. ■1 • ,, i Ate 1r \ , i_ III ', 1 I 1 i-IT-1- , Si) • lE I L. i Tr- I I IL 1 -- 5. it `. G4th T It a • :1_,J.,,, -___ ..,:L-_ ._ .- ---. " • -.'.l'':', ': ":;. '•:, "t':" dr,':r2 , ' ''pie .. • - . .... If' �4r -15 I �� � V r _ 'GENMALOT.DOC _ _ _ çE — _ - I F8t1 wjliEllr i I 1 c. © CITY OF RENTON . , - _. . ea Planning/Building/Public Works ~ tt E"` `'fs ' `� '4 ;11049 1 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 o ( APRtT 0:2-4 c oe �y�} Q.au. i D METU1 s �158182 .0 S.POSTAGE 739890-0970-02 369999 KING JAMES A _ - RENTON WA i KING0a0 980SSSOOS 1N 16 04/19/97 I I RETURN TO SENDER -_.._ __..I_ — ______ ____I NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE n'i�'t4� r 7 UNABLE TO FORWARD s�his t i��L�4 i - v £2 ` P_ES1_sau_rn AFmn ADDRESS �` �,.�.�! iEU�iri Nd I1.1 ' EI1 1i I ' 11 I'IaIII I1 I' I' I i TO SENDER i_�1 v �,�r...^ '1�'� :j ^b7jt�' t'jS:z , ttl!sis s!!f s as s1tEa s tE! i E E s tE aEt i:!Ett Et , t TR4 + 4?4?1\TrfC0' NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. I I PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8) dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval . . ;, Building Permit........... The application can be reviewed.in'the'Development_Ser_vices_Division located;on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted.anytime prior to the En'vironmeritallReview;Committee_(ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearing 7,:pr prior to;an`administrative decision. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY:OF RECORD and receive additional notifications;,, by 'mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or'.the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550:' Please includel,the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. P S i i al �,� SE 18th■ `vr � iUV 4 I . o rn �� i tip ♦ ♦�1 ,; ‘,41 0.1 " 1 terip4.:\ puce-a�%i alm. II V40A"' __� pod si A u g 1 -.4gil\ filla:1) ' ' 1 10141, ••■ an n no n • ( TI"ti ' a)� T L,r " 1 • i v'r. w L 7th ST ll. _it 1 .IL 1;. , ;,;:;_• ,',N,; - ;',-:: n... .,: n': ,,, ! :.':•• :Tf:,,. 11111-s',! Ill 10.11.%441111 \-1:• , :•; -_.:-... -L-..-_.. = ., L., ' ;' ::-.,"c,' ';;z.,:•-.1.! ;; .',. :.',d ')ii,- '::.,, . ':' -,' GENMALOT.DOC14:11.. _ ` - • US is ■ 8t1 - A. , m 1 r— • © CITY OF RENTON - 4 Planning/Building/Public Works ' vL V # • A 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 w N OE 18,$1 ®ems or a CC = g ` 0 2 9 5 Gm ii. F METE A 7l58782 u.s:PosTAoe : , X6.- -- �G e-�� . 1,, %.e,,,,.._,_. ,_ ___ __ _ ______ , __ _ __ _ ____ 73989 021 02 E1279 11 r .jJ . JANET F -- \\ HANFORD 1744 t 98144 u c/ , 'pit A c. ;LE To FORWARD —UM] TO SENDER 6 ;" \ :7")) ' JS 44w v r� . s r' r"`1 I'dilliiI li tiitlii tiliiiitliitll!si1 tiit ti1i titli n iti)J ii CO4 •et + milit + Ialt NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. _ PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8) dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval . • Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior td th'e Environmental Review Committee-(ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative decision. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by. mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please incluist4de the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. Vic, s 1 , ia11ar, I �,� T1� SE18hhl #47,Ip4.., .., r,.„;.,, J d o _a le Air♦A�%1 .6,, miPlicEittiSiP'el#4,‘111 g- 14 lik -.41182 rui or:fill wi t 1 itp% i II N t" M 1 ' ' ..:-. ',.'_ _ . TO .._ �‘:...... A � =� li4th r .3.;" c ff" ( S 27th ST trim ._ :, ...,, P \\I Mill; -: _.•cb ')s `�111 I I .1 GENMALOT.DOC Z _ 7II,vs :l" _ • 8t - a 0 CITY OF RENTON , •. ..u. Planning/Building/Public Works -, ., ,-!-I- _ ,> v:.4).0:ii•v.:‘■-•-.1. 0 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton,Washington 98055 cc - a ‘v • 0 11 • cal- Mg i SS t . -to.eda z 0 2 9 5 1 CC 6 • PBMETER * * ; ::fl587821 U.S. POSTAGE * * ILa: • 739890023008 KENNEDY KATHRYN G 299999 2020 GRANT AVE S f,t74-_1_05_ --- - -- - ---------- — RFNTON KENN020 980552008 iN 25 04/21/97 ---.., , RETURN TO SENDER I IP-_,UFFICIENT ...--..-_--:>,,--1, (je,-‘-, iz NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD I ADDRESS ,,-- j !RETURN TO SENDER ' 5' i\id ,-(;),' z, ,', VZISWV4 24.1:4AS r-v- nduhddlinddiihhuldAhddd,H.41.,,fld 1 1 �Y �GA � -wN�O NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION l RENTON, WASHINGTON l 1 An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application land the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight (8) dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 15001'block of Puget Drive PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval , - • • : Building Permit The application can be reviewed:in the Development Services-Division located ;on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime'.prior,to the Environmental RevieW Committee..(ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative decision'.. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY:;OF RECORD and 'receive additional notifications, 'by, ;mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or'the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. ti y's a .460114A c 0 SE 18th i 4 • ki.:14111;t>gilliPirtk;t44°.474\ 0 iiel AV 4 Opt., IMP th40 Puck-A 741:.a:ottikiiitil ,,,„ iv -,4g•I IA m MI '''i , so 3 i 1' =MI ■■ III----II • 1 �i - tfk MU il - ' r _ . .44 -?_: : _.‘, . _ . ._ . .... , .. .. ,._, , iv - i II 64th r =- '.; ,� '° s-?.. 5 ?_-/th.•SJ ■ 1 in 1 � ,r.. (. �V�1 to Si �: vi 002104,711111 t �ikvii r 1 :r --L GENMALOT.DOC ea� kell,1117r-CD - - -r ■■,�. _ a ■ ins a 0 CITY OF RENTON 14 • " " , ... ..:;- -:?`'-- -- --i.j7,,, "IL , Planning/Building/Public Works - ":71'4° VW' 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 rz ,;--, 0 899 r0 2 9 2 : Ma CD ' ejaCCM a.:• * CC CC 7 $8782 u.s. POSTAGE 1: ---- ---- . - 1160 , • 739.8997 -00 . ' . • ttr,4/1 ,:.' .- . - JOROON DONALD G - - .- . . . 79.9943f"-- 2020 GRANT AVE S ' i'll - :.' . " - -- : RENTON. WA . . , 96.05 ' ---4__ • JORD020 980552008 1N 23 04/21/97 .... RETURN TO SENDER - -----1 : -, 61...6.6,z7z , NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNARLE IO FOR, ARD 1 hODRESS C.::::. _ II _ ,..0 1,) . 7-- ....."---Q . - .,•• N d . 0•`2, i . • iFTURN•TO SENDER • • .- '-- , . . • _.1-. '. t:-... `,1.-[..2. ):.96-A° '.2.,.v,•*51e-4'2-1,4.'4 sr.1:';:t tiduhdandd h.ht. Ulhdil AA d,fl, . hl •••.., • . 1 i , i r Y O A N NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON 1 i An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. ' PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8)dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive PUBLIC APPROVALS Environmental Review -" -r :'; _ : -Site Plan Approval `' _.. _. - •J • V BuildingPermit-1;. _ ' • • 1 The application can be reviewed in the Development Services; Division located on;the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior!to Ithe Environmental Review Committee (ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative decision. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a . PARTY OF RECORD and "receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for.proper file identification. ist,4 r _� ai ' And 6 4 , lilt, ImunriNr_ iis, st tarn " : m l =ih� ' ' f rr rn Per, an 4 e. 0 ilk, :i: # 4 1 Pucc i''.1116"*.it'itia:Lit 7.1 I imr,g ire,\\ 4112 iii so ■■ i 1!-, 4P n . • • JI■ ■■ UI III .: t( 1=1 ! 0 4 \ 1 liA. . MI -1 64th -IIt . IV" 1 : ;:.S•271n..S,T .. r 111 1 .,.. ,!_ ,_ . ,:,• , ••• • •. . it - visk --•E <�1111 ■ w T- . GENMALOT.DOC : _ i ` - __ 1�� 8ti d to CITY OF RENTON ..a Planning/Building/Public Works : ,... 4 • • 200 Mill Avenue South-Renton, Washington 98055 cc L o APR 1 813? reng,u, a._ 0 2 9 a * WA stil - e : ICI CrJ di 1113,01 • CC CC * a. C. ,PBMETER * POSTAGE 739890-1150-02 AT TERBURY RAYMOND E0681 - 2020 GRANT .AVE S fIL-201 RENTON WA.. ' 98055 - —- -- ------ - —---, ATTE020 980552008 1N 23 04/21/97 RETURN TO SENDER / Lee/ , NSUFFICIEN1 ‹.-----7------/.---,d I ,,,,; iz ,,, , NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE ADDRESS %.,... , % 1 . l' i ? c UNABLE TO , 4,21ZtItA1(3_1,3,D ?ETURN TO SENDER : 1 \\;-/ 3 n N., ''' '1?)"'S.:53m.7fr-•V''.7 .-11'S -.- UdAddh..,1,1,.1,1,,,liii.,111.,1,1.1.11,,11,,,,,11,1 a NOTICE.OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON • An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. ' The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. i -PROJECT-NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT I LUA47-051,SA,ECF i DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight (8) dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review . Site'Plan Approval - ; . 1 u- .Building Permit The application can be review.edin_the Development Services' Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime priorttothe Environmental Review"Committee (ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or,prior,to'an administrative decision. •For;further'information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF. RECORD and, receive additional notifications;—by' ` mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing`date(s). for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. �F� s/6;44 vaati uti�.11.r1g I fl IF witigikT r w� SE 18th : *Q h i=i 04 %. AI _ • 8 lire 1910 • *flit u., ILL --c - 0 A 14* 4 eV", PUCE i . rba . ... will L 0 Oita' le roll 2111 Al nil i 'gaol tk -*&11611: r.. ra fig - i , i 14/14ilk - •v. v.. .. In OM ' .il .,,V2,„ • :•• ' • ,-`. - -: 1 i mow ,,., c ., .,.:...,,. ,.:,, ,.. , .,- ,s;_:, .,3::.i 4 ow, . ;._,-. ;,. ,,.-: ii.,‘H..,„: . . '— - . ' ' - L .3164th Mill '' -:!-:':- , -:" '. - C:,' -2:-f-t: . ,L . :-:.J! �• or � l • S 27th ST i 1 i 1-- A, al um g Iiiiiii t �1 Ai � 1'.I111 .RIT.� iettilin GENMALOT.DOC /vI9 _ ���' P` "waftlip ' ■ IIF CITY OF RENTON - - _ - , , -� Planning/Building/Public Works •0 1' 1t.y ; j ' • 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton,Washington 98055 0 '• +!� : ; cn CC1 Ai ¢ P$A. MEp! , ,. 715878 ,U.$.-POSTAGE- .nj 739390-1140-05 .. DELCAMBRE DANIEL .J+HOLLY ' M '079599 2020 GRANT AVE $s -L-10b: 58C55 RENTON WA • ------ — — — — DELCO2O 980552008 iN 23 O4/2i/97 , 1667 ' RETURN TO SENDER MSUFFIG!ENT �.`'^ y NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE �9 (\_, . ' UNABLE TO FORWARD OEMS ETUrN- i0 SENfM ,,d A„� r I.. ./I, ,��)5..?'•'_-' -' .7:: d e C =:- Iliiillielaiiiitililtil,sip,, illmilirelaltiidh;dimi!ILI 1 cotiY G A �i + TR 4. I NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application'and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL-DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF ' DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight (8) dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive PUBLIC APPROVALS: , Environmental Review 'Site Plan Approval '.:' B ,,...1 wilding Permit The application can be'reviewed inihe Development Se i p rvices Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted pnorr�,to;the Environmental ReviewCommittee (ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, oi•prior to'an administrative decision. For;furtherinformation on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY O F ,RECORD and' receive additional notifications,' by_ mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for.proper file identification. . ,G - :s li �wimp. SE 18th � i=i)4,t ,./.) 0 0,14,, ,,, it, 4„,,, , III O A k IC <> AP elk if, . 4 2 , 0*ki. , • Puce i =_ G=) I If i!4m ' 11 it&S , ; = , E I i,; T I •:. :. lititt).. !... :. .: -: . .,, ,„ ., , ,, —77-..is - :-, ' k . ';,'2 ': :',.' ',. '' .. ::'.,-1' ' _ .. ,} - 64th T�. ��G ill • S•27th ST 1, m �� �VerPler2242k101• w W . --.--. [ ` a <� 1 aurn g, 1 1 GENMALOT.DOG �4 ly . aw. 1 h�1 �� — ■, 1 t at — IIIV . . . . . .,., 4 0. CITY OF RENTON all. Planning/Building/Public Works 1.,15 Iv , ,,. 444 ,-:7.........'.........±..r..."7 e- 6x , ' $171a4 ' * 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 .ct - 4. . ' Old OA .?; * . .•0 I-- - • .APR i 6°9 I OP 'tej. ':::: 0 2.9 P. . . a.u.. _ _ ___ .,_ - . . - . 715878 - 1L-8,-VOSTAGE : i •." - --- : - . , 739890-0650-09 - UROUHART . NAOMI TERESA 539999 . P 2020 CRANT , AVE SOUTH tF-20/ RENTON WA 98056 , •.."... .___ • __ _ URfaU020 980552008 iN 23 04/21/97 RETURN TO SENDER , MSUFFICIENT . .,.7--.>:7----- , 6 ZV a .. r ' NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FOnWARD — ADDRESS . ETURN TO SENDER . 'J.' • ANd ...2 - - "-'-'\---,)- sw...?....a..,9-,s.7 , ,./ HdAddtmidAhnhhulihddjamilmufld -.......,- „ �Y O U A NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City;of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8) dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive PUBLIC APPROVALS: ir, . Environmental Review - .. 'Site Plan Approval : - r- ,_ wilding Permit_<..1 ,. The application can be reviewed_in the Development Service's!Division-located on'the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted•anytime prior.to the Environmental Review Committee(ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to en administrative decision:” For;further:information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF, RECORD and receive additional: notifications, -,-by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing dates) for this• project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. t t, • . 1:.pl —vvs, 45.14, ./. _ 4: A ig4cn � 5E 181h H i 0 cil till g liptitA p i (70 1,10 A._4,..Ar„ �'uct it Mora . . i g, ' Ak\ ---' • - Ix it i VI &lit II -\ I r- - f.= i'l' '..",: • -`-: "u-:ili7H ! : .: : ::: L. '_ ,., 2:: _:,:r.7 • ,-,- - • ,,,-, , - - „ ,„, , , �t . , �.... . (� •tip. i ?rir .: 1. ' 21th Si ll .III li_ -- n ���1 p W _s_ GENMALOT.DOG C� : _— - Ft..: �- — i �� r_ 4. •. _ . . . . _ ..._........ • • .CITY OF RENTON . _.;-- - --"t. .;.0zre , ,-."...,.4---- . .• ..›4,_,., • .-•,40Vidaer .... „, . ..:- . ... . . ea Planning/Building/Public Works l• ti • 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton,Washington 98055 . . :01 i 6'91 IV - a --...,- 0-.3 2 - • . , . - ro MEYER . : 73j890-006C703 °Rt./lisp/I. . BARTHOLCMEW- 4554 F• 'JAMES .471;.'.160'irligel,',7„r-,-„ MURRAY .UT - .4,_ ,:- : 1_1,ti Avo itit...h,--..: - .4, • '.------,.. .--, • :,/j:.. .. , ,, • . . -. . • ,..i i ,- In ---,.....,..... • .. -. elbuzgp .•:, -- . -4 .-- .— IT-i-,- !i-l'i ri '-Trt!'-1:1`, ,,,,.....:."L ''''''.4,i....,- ,',..--. .-.,..,.,7. - . • ,,,, 1, Ar Y O v � ♦ ♦ se‘.-ivrc(?' NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8) dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive PUBLIC APPROVALS: ,Environmental Review Site Plan Approval . Building Permit _ The application can be 'reviewed in the,Development,Services Division-located: on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted:anytime.prior to'the-Environmental!Review.Committee:.(ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative decision. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD--and receive additional notifications, .:by ;mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing-date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. V„s lS Li' gri to r, .„ G � 4,1 SE 18th : bQ H i e 1 =.- •-/- L440)11101I-23 o 8 °a rip Z O 4 MP"de,loe ;� ,,o�,�I, 4300I•�11 egi is t 4 OW\ -"4 fig Ex em 0 1 n . k. „ ," " • „ 1 1.,* . . i \I, 1 i.,R. :5.: \ JthSTllIfl \ .` .,M - - o 0 \,. — w w GENMALOT.DOC = " - - - • —_ 1 Ft8t - L- - -s, • ; • a 0 CITY OF RENTON "NIL Planning/Building/Public Works ,..„ 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton,Washington 98055 cc i.,.. . 11 goil 41I Z 0 2 95--- :. do . _ 4C IX as. et. 1 Pa METIrn _:_ 1 , 1138732 U.0.-POST-Iloe : / rfr:: -- T 7 2 .D Q ------------------------___ / '1:':'''-I''. .___.'"'''.'s." ''.' *!!''14,,P1'°_ S-I°E°G7F°R-1°4 D 4-1-s Mil AK_21-offiL EEN 2/49999 - ._1______ _____s,10. t.0 GR I_lki4 ____ / , ..„ \i ---- „ , . , .A _ N d ' :TrIN TO 3Pirlit:3-1 -a - . \.,;:i -_-?-IN_V / , .4. .4 c.) IlilisiiiiillifiiiiiiiiiimM11131111111111111111111111/1 -- -----_.....--- — — -- C�ti�Y O� A , NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON. An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION; The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8)dwelling units: GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan.Approval_: Building Permit.' The application can be reviewed,in the D evelopmenf=Services Division.located:on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime,prior to the Environmental Review Committee:=(ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative decision.'. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF:..RECORD and receive additional notifications, 'by 'mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal-periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. 1 -.):, <()7/' N I\SSE i8th■ :Wig i=i���0= r:, - .61 illt VI ill . AP 4%.or\tt tAik ur .tabedvi., P(/GfNnh , Sjora iI_Sru=-1 roittliil Itgligilik ,4►� L ar:Trip rill t , ' i 40 \ , :_. --II 1 , . T.44A , _ _ L I " T er� le _ . , , . . , 1 V i •. 'r -: : _, L � In S-27ih sr ,0 I. III _- : . - : . i 4M21i It ii11: - _ ,i. . . . t�' 1II4 .L __ -,-\'-,=,r GENMALOTDOC -- - - _ ____ ._..._, ,J% • 1,11 7 APR 1 6 1997 11.111111111111 L.— Z DEVELONiviElyl PLKIVNlNt ? v CITY OF Rf_iVTON ' Cr ��f,r•� VV. • • r ••r� �- r . • ) I II = ' 6\ . . t gi III 1-0,„ ,/ ,ri., 0. . . ....... c;,� SE 18th fa11014k H ga p 4 4... ..- -;1.: a NFA-17 4 4 • ir?itteff4HH41 gie Fr 4 * ip , k. iir * # 0 k it IAA' t> AY totro\ (r) ....,:. 40 of CD it UCE• 79 o0► , ,,_44 fp 01,4* 41111,11 Milli r 1�� .. A RA\ . --, . _ „me if ma irs .. . . till Vim n "I um . -1 sio" • ,,,...„.„, , q,,,,:,,,,,,•:•„,,,,,,:.:. , --\\, 1. p. .. . 1 , Iii, ,....„54, ..,,,„,..:::•„...,.,,,, ,•.,„,.::„,,,.!,:::2 _ ,,,.,, ,. . • .„. $ oi,,,s,:.,,, -;:, ,,.!,.,, - ...•••••°"-It..„..._.___,_. E-1 )64 th s':-, it _. c' 27th ST . \ : bith ' - \\)111ll 1_ L -� �iy�� •••••••••-.1 Emma .1.. a'...110110.Ili.. W.Va.= It V M)•-cE gi.'ficatSsairqv S- :Iii_.'-i" -4'2.-1-.."-.. .......... "fgt:'"" '" "7:Nf-g 4444444 .....au . gg ggi cg.o"g3b2-obLr iwy -Ita alma ( _ --------5715—do...mi 5513.1• ------'"--'--------.----'-•!--•1/1/0. 1211•. mama—,,,,,,..,.,——.0... — ---asyrosra •-4,.. -1____J__.......;1•0,4 6...,/ ,,.....,.r ,•1 ''.,.7,j-:_:-_...V44, -fa..1;40___-..;°?i°1;;,1::,;:.i.::::1 _,i_V 7:..: i '''' -. •,,,TZ:nE I I ,....-,'.-•••,, ""'" c.1.....:_•;.V.- ' i% . r—0; '4'.•;-..vgrz:g —g: nen : ,.11111•••-••••••VV., .44444 I I:5%.,74,ti, C• t t'I MIMI ...,V Title.. ••,,,,.1., __, .,,,,,, I, I-,.- r.....47. 6-r.,.. '.:1 5 • '-- ,..,:i.4.4,44,° • ,,i (,____..1-,I; - . ,or 1,----f--__:1 ....d...4.,.-.,,,,,....4......:43..glii :1.. 1,__, ,.._ ,E,• --,. _J ma ,„..„„..., •„ . E.,...„;„_,_........:0„,„. _, ...., , -- ... ,..,...„ _ i. ...e....P.,t12,111.1.0,1a110:3.4..-Agtii=iii.. _,-. -v . %SUM osiMEZMIN . '....r.• "‘ \\1 T ire ilaan eiriiiii.i.,,,,,,,,3 ." ,E•crlaarel ... . . . . . •.".4,,,,,,,, .......,.....)....wrap a....rtto:44. 37.fgrA"TA,te"4 A'm'rjinrilAts,r--, '''", . .J.(wvou..nd,ta,v41...174µ.• 2,,,ki . (.44..,1 E.) . • .',,i..1 14,.^Ir...".I-1.+Liap..,. 1 R ,,,,,,A0z,2/111...C11-.721.1.,•laS ..''' Z7 •01195 3.1•1 " Pe--P,4 e .eivqe . . Ipz pr.23s COMP 0 1- , , , - ------ ii= •=,, 1,,= -'A_ _ .- ---- 1 1:__NI 7_ 1 1 ._ '_I— --immwm• • _ . . D5 -- ll 1=i7 = ,_151 -11 - ATi 1 — - ,_.__,-7—= ,-,4-,,,Jzfr 7 - 1.77. I.--. r 1 ... _ ______ _I --I I , ======,_-_-----_--===-_-_-=,3 ' 'CALE-74"-P-0" • _ .. ,._. , ... - ---• .. _ _ ._.• barE:cErr eZE:447-ia.. - . - .9....,e,e, === . SEC.20,T.2:: ,,, c•I — 2438 OF 018.428/03/ C. rn 3 T.363/88 MR 3•83928.3) ''', 't 1 .vareed0'sss, X. V;M:XS'girferls -....f__ __ „,_,,_.. ,6.c.gre ArevAv2N4 . z3 \\ I MBE 8,488,0 Ary LOT 28.32. I ' — r,r- 1.3 ...."'-.....f --:::,;•,111111-7.,—,,.A! -.,,J, • t 3,2. i-________14,: -,',- '''''''''1 111.....;'t....'..:.:.•;'';', 0 1-:' r.....i s'N 'i.. ..2',27.AVA, --e, ,='1F.1aIMglIkiP.,."..:.:"..k. 1k.'/i 4i '•1t',,f, I ta,/ff.IffC/gtre2o 1G.f).e.3E388 8\x.;32v=7,e8s4,f,, vo1r,0Zv Ae,f•ssfw r,se:v.=0e.RTAe1.Pe3O,V7E-8,, • / y, • •• '1' ift C7) 8 0 1''" ,0 1, _...Z{ .:.../. /,'.' 7( ..,.4't'4---'" ,zer.PAAV 0 OZ8:4289,8Le APO., CLEAN-our/YARO 0, 1-. •,,,; .1,,,.: .1. , 4,2 „:01 .-. J .7•• -,I 7-- Z ....,......_ , ,__ .... 1 • '''. l'.I / LO 'LI 2".!.. z, Ix 7.-/-1 L 3-4 I 1 I I .... ''. l' . yil 38S —:, 7( pi.--. ---, 10..../ i 1 I\ , @ Total square FooMge o -11!%. I.., ('-'2 )..-.,r l'..c,';:.: Square footage per Soo As.4 -Tool footage..11 ,,,, 24: -i _,„•692 1 313tt 1 Percentage Wier cover .....E' +.'',,1 1 • i/t.-438.38-", ../..- ....I:r''''I'''°I i Parktng spaces _Ir Is. •• v.v A.['NE . -Compact-0 ..„. -Full nee-8 „..S.V.<sraes,:=--1;'• i'• g Squarc footage orlon& 4R. 1 .C1'"- -Intorior parkins na'g . .. • i t * if 1, „t„, r.-:.::. ,32151.8 8,888 -___ -All other.o E ' Zai5:3--.111-L:—" 4r.Met tJ„orreo.„ '" • .$,A7;11" ., Due.,height -Allowable-gr 4 11 171 ,er‘‘,80-.3 ,.. I 4, I , r', ,,,. , 0..„..——, . ,..,,,, ,,,.. -P•oposed.2, Building setbacls per. td - PUGET Side'awls.2 :I It _ I fe. ' .,„ , 4.1. 'r--t0 "" W -Frontage towat.An . _ 8,0 ,I fEV3g872 , DR._ T6 ‘ ZE, N .0.2.0.8 et8221 81881, '''i I t I M 1 31 2 111 ,s, • • •• I ,A0 Ye . .,.;•• 41pC44000. i• ...griti=ce e a. '..-:•:=1:-..,v --- . CURB AND WIER 91( .4§.•,.....,,4.. ..2."'.. 'i.-- '''' .•.•.•.• . . . . 110KVCR.0.ICR CURB • MAT BE USCD. (SEC S....PUNS IIII • ,.......• V •, mr:•,,,,,,c ,_ :it •"::a .•'.:,' ."?'"":." - . 11 -,• AkkitAI,I10*,411 : 0CITY OF RENTON ., = Planning/Building/Public Works Y ;t. s v„ i r ,- 00 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 ®e j0� 12'8 7 :„ehax,=... # o S 7 mil. ,) 'ja' Ti" * � ��— +J— 7PRE QR�'E� F ED ,, 7 4$7 U.S. POSTAGE \../ . _ Rollin Hills Condominiums £' js=' ..,--_-)Li c/o Property Concept ViiiM i t:,�f7 - - Attn Bil 401 Second Avenue South, 3650 C9 '1 va ��i C+`J :;,. _ attle,WA 98104 a Dep-t� - ELIVERABL. • ` f fDRES: :, ;,< __ETOFtg,.,r,is0 ;r ` _ D . 'p • REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION I DECISION DATE: June 10, 1997 I I Project Name: Renton Heights Residential Development Applicnt: Best Construction/Karl Best Owner: Karl Best ' File Number: LUA-097-051,SA,ECF Project Manager: Mark R. Pywell, AICP Projet Description: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four (4) duplex buildings. There will be a total of eight (8) dwelling units on the two existing parcels of land. Project Location: 1500 block of Puget Drive SE Exist. Bldg. Area SF: : . N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 8,328 sf Site Area: - • -.23,384.sf , Total Building-Area SF: 8,328 sf • 0 y k al, ILE rj,a..w,,,,e r =is1`1 ■ ■ � : SE 18th `r I� n ■_ t 4wt 2 ■eA'♦♦♦ •obi 44 N )61, 4t oyyW �♦ ��0018levri, A gory• Qe • ..._-i �� , 11■ 1'■ in En '■ • ` t IN IRIti\***. i 1 gill 1 N .fig fit r 4rjh,Ij ti-ii� r 1.1 se ■■■4 E 8t - ,. Project Location Map sITEERC.Doc 7 City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT L UA-97-051,.SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1' 97 Page 2 of 13 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant has two existing parcels on the 1500 block of Puget Drive SE. The applicant seeks approval to construct four duplex units on the subject site with a common parking'area and a driveway onto Puget Drive...Any existing structures on the subject property will be removed as part . . . of this development.: . , : . • .. . . . . . .. _ . . , ,•. . . PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with R'CW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts , The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: (1) Earth Impacts: There will be a minor amount of grading required for this project. The applicant estimates that there=will be 250 cubic yards.of.cut and 450 cubic yards of fill. This means _ _ that approximately-200 to 450 cubic yards of fill.material imported onto the site depending ' on'the,suitability of the cut material to be reused as fill material. It will require between ten and 35 round ftriip truck trips to complete the cut and fill operations. 1 The applicant has completed a survey of the subject property. There are no wetland areas or steep slopes that will be impacted by the proposed development. The applicant will need to install temporary erosion control measures that the applicant will need to maintain during the construction phase of the development. ' Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall install and maintain temporary erosion control measures to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the construction phase of the project. I Policy Nexus: Mining, Excavation, & Grading Ordinance, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) (2) Air Impacts: Adverse air quality impacts are associated with the construction and operation phase of the development. Construction phase impacts would be associated with dust from ' the grading operation and exhaust from vehicles. Dust will be controlled by sprinkling the site during the grading operation. Exhaust from vehicles is already controlled by state and federal,regulation. • , , , Adverse.air,quality,;impacts would also be associated with the heating of the residential units and,.the operation of motor vehicles on,the:project:site by the residents. These impacts are already controlled by state and federal regulation. No further mitigation measures are required. SITEERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LUA-97.--051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 3 of 13 Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation required. Policy Nexus: N/A (3),-. :Water Impacts: The applicant is proposing to develop four•buildings and_. •' " "'•• ' ' p ' g � associafed,paved areas on a 23,382 sf site. After the project is completed approximately 22% of the site (5,144 sf) will be covered by buildings and 39% of the site (9,138 sf) Will be covered by impervious walkways, parking area, or driveways. The applicant intends to construct infiltration/spreader11trenches in order to biofiltrate the runoff from the parking area. The difference betvveen the pre-development and post-development storm flows from the project site is less than 0.5 cfs according to the analysis prepared by Perco Engineering. Thus, the applicant is not responsible for providing for storm water detention. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is required. Policy Nexus: .N/A (4) Noise Impacts: During the construction phase of the project noise will be generated from the on- ' site construction activities and from the:vehicles as"they access'The site from Puget Drive. • • 'Due to the proximity of residential development to the,project•site the applicant will need to limit construction activities'to the hours from-7:00 AM'to 700'PM Monday through Friday, • h on as•� � �ours � 'Saturday 4 arranged With the Development Services Division;but no hours in excess of the'weekday hours, and no Sunday'Construction. ''Tfie applicant will also need to submit a construction plan showing the haul routes and hours. Haul hours shall be restricted to the hours between 8:30 AM and 3:30 PM unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a construction plan indicating haul routes and hours, construction hours and any traffic control plan prior to the issuance of any construction permits. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 AM'and 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. Policy Nexus: Noise Ordinance, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) (5) Transportation Impacts: The proposed project will generate additional traffic on the circulation system within the City of Renton. In order to mitigate the impacts of this',additional traffic the City has implemented a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per new trip generated. The ITE - ._. - .• Manual states that each residential'unit'ihthis style'of developm'ent'will,generate 6.74 trips. • Therefore, each unit is'assessed a fee of$485:25•tor'a total-fee of$3,882! SITEERC.DOC ._ City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee StaffReport RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-OS1,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 10,1997 Page 4 of 13 Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per Average Additional Daily Trip. At 6.47 trips per unit, in accordance with the ITE Manual, 'each living'unit shall•be charged a fee of$485.25, fora total fee of$3,882, payable with the • ' -..issuance of building permits. ' Policy Nexus: Resolution 3100, Traffic Mitigation,Fee, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) (6) Police and Fire Impacts: The Police Department staff have stated that adequate resources are available to them to serve the proposed project. They have recommended some features be built into the proposal inO�rder to ensure the safety of the residents. Fire Prevention Bureau staff have noted the Code-requirements for the project and that there is a Fire Mitigation fee that will apply to this project. The applicant will need to submit a mitigation fee of $488.00 per new duplex structure., This fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Miti ation Measures: The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation fee of$488.00 per new duplex structure prior to the issuance of a building permit. Policy Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) (7). Parks and Recreation Impacts: The applicant is'creating eight new residential units within the City of Renton. Due to the small size of the project site, the applicant has not provided on-site recreational facilities. These new residents will make use of the existing and future parks and recreational oppprtunities available within the City. The Community Services Department has adopted a recreation mitigation fee to mitigate the impact of the new residents on the City's park and recreation system. The applicant;will need to submit a fee of$354.41 per new residential unit within the project. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a Parks Mitigation fee of $354.41 per new residential unit vyithin the project (8 units x$354.41 = $2,835.28) prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Parks Mitigation Fee Ordinance, Environmental Review (SEPA) 1 • B. Recommendatipn Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Off'cials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. XX ' Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment and Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment and Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Appeal Period. Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. SITEERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 5 of 13 C. Mitigation Measures 1.. The applicant.shall install and maintain temporary erosion control measures to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration.of.,the construction phase of the project. 2. The applicant shall submit a construction plan indicating haul routes and hours, construction hours and any traffic control plan prior to the issuance of any construction permits. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. 4. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per Average Additional Daily Trip. At 6.47 trips per unit, in accordance with the ITE Manual, each living unit shall be charged a fee of$485.25, for a total fee of$3,882, payable with the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation fee of$488.00 per new duplex structure (8 units x $488.00 = $3,904.00) prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6. The applicant shall submit a Parks Mitigation fee of$354.41 per new residential unit within the project (8 units x$354.41.= $2,835.28):prior:to the issuance of building permits. SITEERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 6 of 13 Advisory Notes to Applicant: ,1 The following notes are s 'pplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination:-,Because tt ese.notes are provided as information only, theY are not subject to.the, ; appeal process:for environmental determinations. . ,., _ ,.. 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 2. The applicant will need to pave the entire parking area in accordance with the City of Renton Code. WATER UTILITY 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$510 per multifamily unit and shall be assessed and payable with the construction permit. 8 units = $4080 2. Water service shall be provided by either single meter services per unit or per building. Separate taps and service line's shall be installed. ; SANITARY SEWER UTILITy 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$350 per multifamily site and shall be assessed with the construction permit. 8 units = $2890 2. Separate side services !hall be provided per building. SURFACE WATER UTILITY, 1. The identified upstream outfalls shall be included in a stormwater conveyance system, tightlined, or otherwise conveyed to;ari.appropriate downstream'faciliity in.accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual... . ,,.. : . : , --.:.. 2. The System DevelopmentCh'arge-shall be at the current rate of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface. 9362'sq'. Ft. = $1206.40 PLAN REVIEW - GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform o the Renton Drafting Standards!. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family homes and duplexes. If the square footage of the structure exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the required fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and two hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. AIRPORT MANAGER 1. The proposed project is located at an elevation of 391 above sea level. The project site is within the 10,000 foot Horizontal Surface of the airport, which has,an elevation of 179 feet above sea level. Since the project is located within the Horizontal Surface area, aircraft will be flying very low over and around the project houses. Some method to ensure that purchasers and renters are informed of this fact.by the seller/manager, is requested. Approval of this project constitutes a_compatible use within the airport area. :I SITEERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT L UA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 7 of 13 PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT &"DECISION' ` • • ' This decision on the administrative land use.action is made concurrently with the environmental';t' "':' s`_ determination. A. Type of Land Use Action XX Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative.Code.Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into'the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this.request. Exhibit No: 2: Drawing No: 1 of 1, Site Plan (Received April116; 1997). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. F=1, Building Floor Plan(Received'April16, 1997)., Exhibit.No. 4: Drawing•No. E-1,Building Elevation (Received April'16, ;1997);.. Exhibit'No: 5: Drawing No. L-I Landscape Plan(Received April 16, 1997) „ . C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31- 33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; The proposed project is consistent with the .Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Element designation of Residential Multi-Family Infill (RMI). The RMI designation is intended to provide infill opportunities in existing multi-family areas. Policy LU-64 Development density should generally be in the range of 10-20 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project is at a density of 14.9 units to the acre. This density is well within the acceptable range for this area. Policy LU-67 Siting and design of new structures should be sensitive to site constraints and adjacent users. Provision of adequate buffers or setbacks or scaling.down of building heights may be -required .to transition from Residential Multi-Family Infill designation to :adjacent lower density;.uses.. The site borders:on,a;Residential"Single Family area to the : . east.:...The proposed duplexes:would provide a better transition:to,the adjacent single family area than would a more intense multi-family development. ._ SITEERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT L UA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORTAND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 8 of 13 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The project site is designated as Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) on the City of Renton :Zoning:Map: The proposed project is not.consistent with the"development standards of the . RM-I,zone, as proposed: Duplexes,arp.a permitted,;use in the RM-I Zone.-,The two areas of inconsistency are..the; location of parking stalls in,.the front,yard ;setback and the gravel parking area proposed by the applicant. In accordance with the Code-requirements the parking area will need to be paved. The develop r ent standards require a minimum front yard setback of twenty feet, a rear yard setback of fifteen feet and side yard setbacks of eight feet. The applicant is providing the appropriate rear and front yard setbacks.;:Instead of the minimum eight foot side yards the applicant is providing setbacks of 30 feet in order to provide each unit with an adequate yard area. The RM-1 zone allows for a maximum height of 30 feet. The proposed buildings have a maximum height, to the-peak of the roof, of 25i feet. The applicant is proposing to provide sixteen parking places within the development. Eight of these parking spaces will be in garages and eight are proposed as open parking spaces. The Parking and Loading Codes requires two, parking spaces per unit for duplexes but only 1.75 parking spaces for per unit for multi-family development. The applicant in trying to comply with the standards for a duplex, that were designed for a single duplex on a single lot, has located two parking stalls in the front'yard and two parking stalls in the rear yard. The development standards specifically stateithat the parking is acceptable in the rear yard but does,not make the-same provisions:for the;front yard setback area. City staff eontend "that the two parking stalls'in' the:front yard setback are not required in order for the applicant to meet the parking ,requirements for the proposed project. The parking stalls should also be removed as they are prohibited from,the front yard setback area within this zone. 3. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The proposed project is adjacent to an existing single family neighborhood. The applicant has provided a fence detail but is unclear oh the drawings where the six foot tall fence would be located. The applicant will need to install a fence along the east and west boundary of the project site outside of the front yard setback. The fence may be tied into the proposed buildings to create private yards for the residents. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan for the project site. Two of the proposed parking stalls extend into the front yard setback area. As staff has recommended that these two stalls be removed from the project, the applicant will need to submit a revised landscaping plan that demonstrates the landscaping plan for the full width of the front yard setback. The fence noted above should also:be shown an the landscape plan. 4. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; There is a filed retaining wall that was made of railroad ties and has slumped onto the subject property. There are as many as eight storm water pipes that empty out onto the subject property. The applicant's plans indicate that these issues will be addressed by other parties. This work will need to be concluded to City of Renton standards prior to the final inspection for occupancy. SITEERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 9 of 13 5. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposed project will be constructed on a site designated for multi-family housing that is currentl vacant: The _ ro osed will=hel to conserve are _ ... .. .. ... . P. P ..Will project.. ... , . ., P a.:Wide'property values by Y� . past dti the'hievel p. Y be'a transition from;the single family neighborhood to the roVidin a develo ment that well�� ily-developments to the west: = •="'- �- denslt �multi fam 6. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; • The applicant has provided a single circulation system for the project site that in reality could be two developments, each on their own lot. This reduces the number of driveways on Puget Drive and will make for safer turning movements in the public right-of-way. The applicant has not provided for a pedestrian only path between the site and the sidewalk along Puget Drive. This means that pedestrian would need to use the driveway to enter and leave the site. City staff recommend that the applicant be required to provide a • sidewalk or path along one side of the driveway between the:edge of the project site and the existing sidewalk so that pedestrians'and vehicles-will not be using the same access point. 7. Provision of adequate light and air; The buildings are well setback from the property lines and separated from one another by twenty-four feet. This spacing should allow for adequate sunlight to reach each of the buildings and allow for adequate circulation of air around the buildings: 8. Mitigation of noise,,odors and,other harmful or.unhealthy conditions The proposed project should not'release S significant noise; 'odors or•otherwise unhealthy conditions:that have not,been addressed;by,the proposed.sight plan or by existing state and federal regulations. , 9. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Adequate public services exist to serve the proposed project. 'The applicant may need to extend service lines as required by existing City Codes. 10. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The applicant has proposed a project that will develop a vacant piece of property that will be a transition area between existing levels of development on either side of the project site. This development and the maintenance of the property should help to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight. XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 9) Request The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for the construction of four duplex structures. SITE ERC.DOC ; City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 10 of 13 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's : file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices reques:ing citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: -. -The applicant's site plan-application complies with the-requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 5. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Multi-Family- Infill. 5) Zoning: The Conditional Use as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Residential Multi-Family- Infill Zoning designation. II 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding'the subject site include: North: multi-family residential; East: single family residential; South: multi-family residential and West: multi-family residential. E. Conclusions 11 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Multi- Family-Infill; and the Zoning designation of Residential Multi-Family Infill. F. Decision The Site Plan for Renton Heights Residential Development, File No. LUA-97-051, SA,ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for frontage area along Puget Drive to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. This plan shall demonstrate the deletion of the two parking stalls that were proposed in the front yard setback. 2. The applicant shall construct a six foot tall wood fence along the east and west boundary of the project area outside of the front yard setback. This fence may be tied into the proposed buildings to create private yards for the resi1ents. 3. Any work identified on the property to be completed by others shall be finished and in place prior to final inspection for occupancy. 4. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian access between the subject property and the existing sidewalk along Puget Drive. The proposed access shall be shown on the landscape plan. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECIS ON ON LAND USE ACTION: June 16, 1996 SITEERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page I1 of 13 SIGNATURES: • A ' e,-_l,2 -q7 oHnn dJa CoZi Administrator� ate 6 --/ . `t'J - Michael D.Kattermann,Zoning Administrator date • I 1 SITEERC.DOC i City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval.&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT L UA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 ,' Page 12 of 13 TRANSMITTED this 16th day of June, 1997 to the applicant and owner: Karl Best - - . . , . " 'Best-Construction'` ;: • - :i .,; ' • . - .,, .. , 10117- 159th Ave.SE ~ .!: .~'i '; : : :: ,..,,,! -. Snohomish, WA 98290 TRANSMITTED this 16th day of June, 1997 to the parties%ofre''cord ••',Y ,i3,= ' e ': ::`' '•'`= Rose&Raymond Saude - 2019 Rolling Hills Ave. SE ' Renton, WA 98055 Teresa Copeland 2020 Grant Ave. SE#M205 Renton, WA 98055 David&Gail Dean ,: 2007 Rolling Hills Ave..SE _ . Renton, WA 98055 ; Elbido Rabang 2107 Jones PL SE Renton, Wa 98055 Vaughn Smith 1 2020 Grant Ave. SE#M301 Renton, WA 98055 , Rolling Hills Condominiums i C/O Property Concepts 401 2nd Ave. South, #605 Renton, WA 98055 Edna Bagnariol 221 S. 4th Place Renton, Wa 98055 TRANSMITTED this 16th day of June, 1997 to the following: Larry Meckling,Building Official ' Bob Arthur,Land Use Inspector Art Larson,Fire Marshal ' Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal • Environmental Deter ination Comment Process 'Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 30, 1997, (15 days from the date of publication). Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination'of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person:wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. • Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor City of Renton Development Services Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 SITEERC.DOC y, .e City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 13 of 13 • • Environmental Determination.and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision:must.be - filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 30, 1997 (15 days from the date of publication).a,< i:'. >.,'., • If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become..final..::._ ; - Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. SITEERC.DOC CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 11, 1997 Mr. Karl Best Best Construction - 10117- 159th Avenue SE Snohomish, WA 98290 SUBJECT: Renton Heights Residential Development Project No. LUA-97-051,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Best: This letter is written on behalf of the,Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on June 10, 1997, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with conditions. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Comment Process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 30, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 30, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. WAC 197-11-660 states that the responsibility for mitigation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project, any mitigation measure established by the ERC not directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. DNSMLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 .cam_ I t • June 11, 1997 Page-2 Mr. Karl Best Best Construction LUA-97-051,SA,ECF June 11, 1997 Page-2- Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation measures recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for:implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, /a/ls/ /eP Mark R. P ,AICP Project Manager cc: Parties of Record: Mr.& Mrs. Raymond Sande;Ms.Teresa Copeland; Mr. & Mrs. David Dean; Mr�,Elbidio Pabang;.Mr. Vaughn Smith; Rolling Hills Condominiums; Ms. Edna Bagnariol �I Enclosure: dnsmltr a + CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-051,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Best Construction/Karl Best PROJECT NAME: Renton Heights Residential Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight_(8) dwelling units. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1500 block of Puget Drive Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall install and maintain temporary erosion control measures to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the construction phase of the project. 2. The applicant shall submit a construction plan indicating haul routes and hours, construction hours and any traffic control plan prior to the issuance of any construction permits. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of:the.weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. 4. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per Average Additional Daily Trip. At 6.47 trips per unit, in accordance with the ITE Manual, each living unit shall be charged a fee of $485.25, for a total fee of$3,882, payable with the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation fee of$488.00 per new duplex structure (8 units x $488.00 = $3,904.00) prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6. The applicant shall submit a Parks Mitigation fee of$354.41 per new residential unit within the project (8 units x$354.41 = $2,835.28) prior to the issuance of building permits. The Site Plan for Renton Heights Residential Development, File No. LUA-97-051, SA,ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for frontage area along Puget Drive to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. This plan shall demonstrate the deletion of the two parking stalls that were proposed in the front yard setback. 2. The applicant shall construct a six foot tall wood fence along the east and west boundary of the project area outside of the front yard setback. This fence may be tied into the proposed buildings to create private yards for the residents. 3. Any work identified on the property to be completed by others shall be finished and in place prior to. final inspection for occupancy. 4. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian access between the subject property and the existing sidewalk along Puget Drive. The proposed access shall be shown on the landscape plan. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-051,SA,ECF ' APPLICANT: Best Construction/Karl Best PROJECT NAME: Renton Heights Residential Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight (8) dwelling units. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1500 block of Puget Drive Advisory Notes to Applicant:l The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks: 2. The applicant will need to pave the entire parking area in accordance with the City of Renton Code. WATER UTILITY 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$510 per multifamily unit and shall be assessed and payable with the construction permit. 8 units= $4080 2. Water service shall be provided by either single meter services per unit or per building. Separate taps and service lines shall be installed. SANITARY SEWER UTILITY 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$350 per multifamily site and shall be assessed with the construction permit. 8i units= $2800 2. Separate side services shall be provided per building. SURFACE WATER UTILITY 1. The identified upstream outfalls shall be included in a stormwater conveyance system, tightlined, or otherwise conveyed to an appropriate downstream facility in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 2. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface. 9352 sq. Ft. = $1206.40 .PLAN REVIEW-GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton'Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee w,orksheet is attached for Your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family homes and duplexes. If the square footage of the structure exceeds 3600 square feet in area,the required fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and two hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. AIRPORT MANAGER 1. The proposed project is located at an elevation of 391 above'sea level. The project site is within the 10,000 foot Horizontal Surface of the airport, which has an elevation of 179 feet above sea level. Since the project is located within the Horizontal Surface area, aircraft will be flying very'low over and around the project houses. Some method to ensure that purchasers and renters are informed of this fact by the seller/manager, is requested. Approval of this project constitutes a compatible use within the airport area. CITX .F RENTON selL '' Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 23, 1997 Ms. Theresa A. Copeland 1020 Grant Ave. South,#M205 Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Renton Heights Residential Development LUA-97-051,SA,ECF Dear Ms. Copeland: We have received your letter requesting that the applicant for the Renton Heights project be required to construct a fence along the north property line of his property. The intent of this fence would be to provide a separation between the proposed project and the Rolling Hills Condominiums. The applicant has submitted a letter, that is now part of the file, stating that it is his intention to construct a fence in this area and that the fence was part of his site plan. As a fence along the north property boundary was part of the site plan it was not necessary for staff to condition the project for the fence in this area. A project must be built as shown on the approved site plan unless a condition of approval modifies the site plan. If feasible, City staff will work with the developer to construct the fence along the north property line as part of the initial development of the project. If you have any further question regarding this matter, please contact me at 277-5586. Sincerely, Mark R. P ,AICP Projec ager 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 T.. .--------- CIT' OF RENTON LL .1 \ Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 23, 1997 Mr. William D. Satrom President Property Concepts, Inc. 401 Second Avenue South, #650 Seattle, WA 98104 Subject: Renton Heights Residential Development LUA-97-051,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Satrom: We have received your letter requesting that the applicant for the Renton Heights project be required to construct a fence along the north property line of his property. The intent of this fence would be to provide a separation between the proposed project and the Rolling Hills Condominiums. The applicant has submitted a letter, that is now part of the file, stating that it is his intention to construct a fence in this area and that the fence was part of his site plan. As a fence along the north property boundary was part of the site plan it was not necessary for staff to condition the project for the fence in this area. A project must be built as shown on the approved site plan unless a condition of approval modifies the site plan. If feasible, City staff will work with the developer to construct the fence along the north property line as part of the initial development of the project. If you have any further question regarding this matter, please contact me at 277-5586. Sincerely, Mark R. P , AICP Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Ica_. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION m z Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of 0 0 the m K n z,-,,,-,„ mo SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL Z>mTZ*�K 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 =m z- m-10 z0z a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal o Z newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months Z K _i prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language D continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County m Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. . CD o 0 0 0 o c c-pcaCD c o �� _m 0 ...< < 3 a.3 _ -1(QD .-1y<ZS_�`a 3 H The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County 2 -0 0 3 w a s c s X m-, Z 0 7, Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers a ° c B N o -o g= a, o ziv = ; during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Cr Q z P u 0 iv`° a 1r. o CD CD < `c a ..:2, >z mg . N o co N -- N tt1 D Z m(D .» 0 3 Notice of Environmental Determination co t =o-to .o �� -m 0 e n co 3• zmmco.Em oaa) cm °' m 0=ZI on= R. m< cco cn g C aspublishedon: 6/1.,/97 .zw3oow�nD) owe � a�� v . o� on pgo M3 .z03 < O O= g d co� . CT'0 < (n m O-a W f The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$44.92 m 3 = n a T9 (13 CD o cn o o C_ o 0 Legal Number 3179 c Nz - co 0 Z = 3• c3 370 o Qo c ^coHcs 3 c-, c_z.� m vi N o m o= F m o. o,o E > o7� co LeC �� mstrvmow m g lerk, So%th County Journal CD c c,o- <- Q j-- " 0 0 N 3 ,? a� m 3 •- CD w �' Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of 19 �( �] •o N s a 3 2(O Ti0 37 0 d 7 O_, c< 0 ka---If 0 m CD CO K- *. r— ``k 0 mw chiF 3 oo r �Nai ,M;,Fe,y�\\1 Notary Public of the State of Washington o o -0 0 3 ,`��.��SstioN X�•,�2�11 residing in Renton K w.D ai cn 3 .. _. �i ' � 9F;-.;j' Ij King County, Washington g` = Q Q ., - A F vu 1, 3 - 0 cN.37 2 g1 *- c, `% /1cn�;,. .. - yogi CIT'AL OF RENTON ...LL ' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 23, 1997 • Mr. Karl Best Best Construction 10117 - 159th Avenue SE Snohomish, WA 98290 SUBJECT: Renton Heights Residential Development Project No. LUA-97-051,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Best: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, Mark R. Pywell Project Mana FLNAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - dy___2/ 492_ Ci-y_a Kea° • P I Ablkido_r Ks DO: REcEN-74) iii1IIi: JUL StL6je_cf: Reriioniteyr/5 - Ceciat_• Wood Fence ciEvlogrr-ZZ'G 'Dear Sirs: - rqunes-L, ctin 0.-ft in wri1-iy my - LdrTr±di icence constr'40D io cOnsinicf a.'15011d_w_o_cci_cedcu- kive aows on Wie AloilA side of Ole proixt (achj Mks le-nm I V-ho,ufhi was /hail ce& on mg Subinetv' sJkyo/aThe bt_ceto-kaicd- wb a,/1 41)&7 71-(4-0_11ht>5___Laicaled cflic gaff. ..521L-ate / _4ff' Oist - - Vr • Washington State Northwest Region •, Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North • Sid Morrison P.O.Box 330310 Secretary of Transportation Seattle,WA 98133-9710 (206)440-4000 DATE: June 20, 1997 DEVELOPMENT P� CITY op p r- NN1NG itv TO: Mark Pywell T j1 N 2 r 997 City of Renton, Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South RECEiV Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 515 MP 6.76.CS 1741 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-Renton Heights Residential Development, Construct 4 duplex a total of 8 dwelling units • File No.LUA-97-051,SA,ECF FROM. Robert A. Josephson, PE, Manager of Planning& Local Coordination • Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project, which is located in the 1500 block of Puget Drive . Our response is below: We have reviewed the subject document and have no further comments. The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. If you have any questions,please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at • 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name Theresa A Copeland 20 Grant Ave South #M20E _ Renton, WA 98055 June 23, 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON 'JUN 2 5 1997 Attn: Jana Huerter Land Use Review Supervisor RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Renton Heights Residential Developement Project No. L.UA-97-051,SA,ECF Dear Ms Huerter: I am writing regarding the above referenced development which abuts Rolling Hills Condominium on it s north and west sides. In the Mitigation Measures and Conditions document relating to the development, item #2 under CONDITIONS requires that "The appl- icant shall construct a six foot tall wood fence along the east and west boundary of the project area outside of the front yard setback. " While I appreciate the fences are required am puzzled by the fact that a fence was not also required on the north boundary of the project area. THIS LETTER IS TO FORMALLT REQUEST THAT A SIMILAR FENCE ALSO BE REQUIRED ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT AREA, AS THIS IS THE SIDE OF THE PROJECT WHICH WILL BE MOST VISIBLE FROM ROLLING HILLS CONDOMINIUM. You may reach me at work (206).162-7455 OR by writing to me at the above address. My home phone will go on message machine after the 4th ring (206) 255-8739. Sincerely, resa Cop nd • 1- Iv ! . .Lore- ,- 3 0 2 PROPERTY CONCEPTS, INC. Management and Maintenance OEVELOPMENT PLANNING June 23, 1997 CRT" rminN ATTN : Jana Huerter JUN 2 4 1997 Land Use Review Supervisor City of Renton Development Services Division RECEIVED 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE Renton Heights-Residential Development Project No. LUA-97-051,SA,ECF Dear Ms. Huerter: I am writing to you on behalf of the Rolling Hills Condominium Board of Directors concerning the above referenced development which abuts Rolling Hills Condominium on its north and west sides. In the Mitigation Measures and Conditions document relating to the development, item #2. under CONDITIONS requires that"The applicant shall construct a six foot tall wood fence along the east and west boundary of the project area outside of the front yard setback." While the Rolling Hills Board appreciates that the fences have been required, they are puzzled by the fact that a fence was not also required on the north boundary of the project area. THE PURPOSE OF THIS LETTER THEREFORE IS TO FORMALLY REQUEST THAT A SIMILAR FENCE ALSO BE REQUIRED ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT AREA, AS THIS IS THE SIDE OF THE PROJECT WHICH WILL BE MOST VISIBLE FROM ROLLING HILLS CONDOMINIUM. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Please feel free to contact me at 401 2nd Ave South Seattle, WA 98104 or by phone at (206) 340-0659. Sincerely, PROPERTY CONCEPTS, INC:: William D. Satrom President rh\duplexes.doc 401 Second Avenue South,#650 Seattle Washington 98104 (206)340-0659 CIT% OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department ammr Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 30, 1997 Mr. Karl Best Best Construction 10117- 159th Ave. SE Snohomish, WA 98290 Subject: Renton Heights Residential Development • Dear Mr. Best: I have tried on several days to reach you by phone and have not been able to reach anyone at 334-9430. We have received the enclosed comment letter regarding your project. The letter request that a fence be constructed on the north property line between your project and the Rolling Hills Condominiums. The easiest way to resolve this would,be for you to submit a letter indicating that you are willing to construct a solid wood fence along this property line and feel that this would only be a minor change to the approved site plan. If you feel that it would be unreasonable for you to provide the fence, please submit a letter'stating your reasons. I will then submit your letter to the Zoning Administrators with the letters received from the neighbors for their determination'in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this project,please contact me at 277-5586 or my supervisor, Jana Huerter, at 235-2550. • Sincerely, • • Mark R. P P _ Project ger • • 200 Mill Avenue South -.Renton, Washington 98055 . PROPERTY CONCEPTS, INC. Management and Maintenance DEVELOPMENT PLANNING June 23, 1997 ClrV^-':7-kr nN ATTN : Jana Huerter JUN 2 4 1997 Land Use Review Supervisor City of Renton Development Services Division RECEIVED 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 . RE Renton Heights Residential Development Project No. LUA-97-051,SA,ECF Dear Ms. Huerter: I am writing to you on behalf of the Rolling Hills Condominium Board of Directors concerning the above referenced development which abuts Rolling Hills Condominium on its north and west sides. In the Mitigation Measures and Conditions document relating to the development, item#2. under CONDITIONS requires that"The applicant shall construct a six foot tall wood fence along the east and west boundary of the project area outside of the front yard setback." 'While the Rolling.Hills Board appreciates that the fences have been required, they are puzzled by the fact that a fence was not also required on the north boundary of the project area. • THE PURPOSE OF THIS LETTER THEREFORE IS TO FORMALLY REQUEST THAT A SIMILAR FENCE ALSO BE REQUIRED ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT AREA, AS THIS IS THE SIDE OF THE PROJECT WHICH WILL BE MOST VISIBLE FROM ROLLING HILLS CONDOMINIUM. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Please feel free to contact me at 401 2nd Ave South Seattle, WA 98104 or by phone at (206) 340-0659. Sincerely, PROPERTY CONCEPTS, INC. • • William D. Satrom President rMduplexes.doc • 401 Second Avenue South,#650 Seattle Washington 98104 (206)340-0659 Theresa A Copeland iuc0 Grant Ave South #M205 Renton, WA 98055 June 23, 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON IUN 2 5 1997 Attn: Jana Huerter Land Use Review Supervisor � � CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION VED 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Renton Heights Residential Developement Project No. L.UA-97-051,SA,ECF Dear Ms Huerter: I am writing regarding the above referenced development which abuts Rolling Hills Condominium on it s north and west sides. In the Mitigation Measures and Conditions document relating to the development, item #2 under CONDITIONS requires that "The appl- icant shall construct a six foot tall wood fence along the east and west boundary of the project area outside of the front yard setback. " While I appreciate the fences are required am puzzled by the fact that a fence was not also required on the north boundary of the project area. THIS LETTER IS TO FORMALLT REQUEST THAT A SIMILAR FENCE ALSO BE REQUIRED ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT AREA, AS THIS IS THE SIDE OF THE PROJECT WHICH WILL BE MOST VISIBLE FROM ROLLING HILLS CONDOMINIUM. You may reach me at work (206) 762-7455 OR by writing to me at the above address. My home phone will go on message machine after the 4th ring (206) 255-8739. Sincerely, resa Cop -1- I nd 60/ o( N.QA(ip.m.oiLti CM011-) oedtz /W-cO a . DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTOrj „ON 1 1997 RECEIVED • Jana Huerter Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division 200 Mill Ave S . Renton WA 98055 :Renton Heights Residential Development Project#LUA-97-51,SA,ECF After having read the Mitigation Measures and Conditions I really have only one major concern. I do not understand why the fencing that will be put on the east and west sides of the property does not also include the north side. This is the area that abuts the Rolling Hills Condominiums parking area. When the trees are in bloom it won't make a big difference,but in the fall and winter when all the leaves are gone there will be nothing to shield either the tenants of the duplexes or the owners of the condominiums. My hope is that there will be a green belt as well as a fence. Thank you for your attention. Edna M.Bagnariol • 221 S 4th Pl EDNA BAGNARIOL Renton WA 98055 n� 2020 Grant Ave S Unit I102 xixvi,itftch'n v tuff >occxx Needlework&Craft Suppli-s Cross Stitch •Needlepoint • -ewe( Brazilian Embroidery 221 S.4th Place (206)255-2706 Renton.\A 98055 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JUN 1 81997 RECEIVED Jana Huerter Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division 200 Mill Ave S Renton WA 98055 :Renton Heights Residential Development Project#LUA-97-51,SA,ECF After having read the Mitigation Measures and Conditions I really have only one major concern. I do not understand why the fencing that will be put on the east and west sides of the property does not also include the north side. This is the area that abuts the Rolling Hills Condominiums parking area. When the trees are in bloom it won't make a big difference,but in the fall and winter when all the leaves are gone there will be nothing to shield either the tenants of the duplexes or the owners of the condominiums. My hope is that there will be a green belt as well as a fence. Thank you for your attention. Edna M.Bagnariol 221 S 4th P1 Renton WA 98055 EDNA BAGNARIOL 2020 Grant Ave S Unit I102 xx,,,` 3tftch'ne5tuff X>COCX Needlework&Craft Supplies Cross Stitch •Needlepoint • Crewel Brazilian Embroidery 221 S.4th Place (206)255-2706 Renton,WA 98055 t • :>:::>:;:>:T:::.<:; �NNIN' `DJAVON ommi ` ummom> <> » <>>€<ii>i>< `i P AFFIDAVit .>:SERVICE B1 MAILIN > < <> ' << < > >?'` » miim 'u >>> On the 1'2,1° . day of 'tu.v t.. , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United • States, &sealed envelope containing • OMck CtS16% documents. This information was.sent to: Name Representing der\ emit CAhs\v .c-L- irv% o e shd innov A Saude:. • "Ttv+esa. Co lave td ay.d Gall Dee, v. • • 1 ' o 1t eLk54.a, S Vv.A',. o ll t wol ‘115 Covmaft n w.tu vent • Edv.a 1.3ao vc•-r tut • (Signature of Sender) SG1orvckVoh. V- • Sc• a r- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) _ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that• '7/'- signed this ' - instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: .`6 .(I 2M57 �72 • • Notary Publid.rn and for the State of hington r'' „w.. • Notary(Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF .�,�,ati°c. My appointment expire • Projec.?Name:• "7:pe►^ron t ttlict% 'Qeos,deAlta\ • t2Cvclo ‘eh- Project Number: ` w LU" ^o5I3sp. wEt NOTARY.DOC' • ' REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: June 10, 1997 Project Name: Renton Heights Residential Development Applicant: Best Construction/Karl Best Owner: Karl Best File Number: LUA-097-051,SA,ECF Project Manager: Mark R. Pywell, AICP Project Description: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four (4) duplex buildings. There will be a total of eight (8) dwelling units on the two existing parcels of land. Project Location: 1500 block of Puget Drive SE Exist. Bldg. Area SF: N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 8,328 sf Site Area: 23,384 sf- Total Building Area SF: 8,328 sf ' !-,0 oz s'is4 t tell �. SE 18th� 011 .i.b. r41=' . vi 0 ....41 If re , 6,,, 14 ittzt> 0 Ofttr, . 0 Imo I mow, •• iris _.� , r ink ._\ ,P.4Pli Ai ;a fill "1 i Is,'may jFId i ti tPiiil(/3 : . S 27th ST . 64th :T a Iti, i k .gymea .. Ilk . ars. Project Location Map - sITEERc.Doc City'of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval& !mental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL Lc, z,LOPMENT LUA-97-051,SA,ECF • REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 2 of 13 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant has two existing parcels on the 1500 block of Puget Drive SE. The applicant seeks approval to construct four duplex units on the subject site with a common parking area and a driveway onto Puget Drive. Any existing structures on the subject property will be removed as part of this development. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: (1) Earth Impacts: There will be a minor amount of grading required for this project. The applicant estimates that there will be 250 cubic yards of cut and 450 cubic yards of fill. This means that approximately 200 to 450 cubic yards of fill material imported onto the site depending on the suitability of the cut material to be reused as fill material. It will require between ten and 35 round-trip truck trips to complete the cut and fill operations. The applicant has completed a survey of the subject property. There are no wetland areas or steep slopes that will be impacted by the proposed development. The applicant will need to install temporary erosion control measures that the applicant will need to maintain during the construction phase of the development. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall install and maintain temporary erosion control measures to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the construction phase of the project. Policy Nexus: Mining, Excavation, & Grading Ordinance, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) (2) Air Impacts: Adverse air quality impacts are associated with the construction and operation phase of the development. Construction phase impacts would be associated with dust from the grading operation and exhaust from vehicles. Dust will be controlled by sprinkling the site during the grading operation. Exhaust from vehicles is already controlled by state and federal regulation. Adverse air quality impacts would also be associated with the heating of the residential units and the operation of motor vehicles on the project site by the residents. These impacts are already controlled by state and federal regulation. No further mitigation measures are required. SITEERC.DOC City'ofRenton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Ei mental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL D il,LOPMENT L UA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 3 of 13 Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation required. Policy Nexus: N/A (3) Water Impacts: The applicant is proposing to develop four buildings and associated paved areas on a 23,382 sf site. After the project is completed approximately 22% of the site (5,144 sf) will be covered by buildings and 39% of the site (9,138 sf) will be covered by impervious walkways, parking area, or driveways. The applicant intends to construct infiltration/spreader'trenches in order to biofiltrate'the:runoff.from.the parking area. The difference between the pre-development and post-development storm flows from the project site is less than 0.5 cfs according to the analysis prepared by Perco Engineering. Thus, the applicant is not responsible for providing for storm water detention. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is required. Policy Nexus: N/A (4) Noise Impacts:- During the construction phase of the project noise will be generated from the on- ::site construction'activities and from the vehicles as they access the site from Puget Drive. Due to the proximity of residential development to the project site the applicant will need to limit construction activities to the hours from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM Monday through Friday, hours on Saturday as arranged with the Development Services Division but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. The applicant will also need to submit a construction plan showing the haul routes and hours. Haul hours shall be restricted to the hours between 8:30 AM and 3:30 PM unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a construction plan indicating haul routes and hours, construction hours and any traffic control plan prior to the issuance of any construction permits. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. Policy Nexus: Noise Ordinance, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) (5) Transportation Impacts: The proposed project will generate additional traffic on the circulation system within the City of Renton. In order to mitigate the impacts of this additional traffic the City has implemented a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per new trip generated. The ITE Manual states that each residential unit in this style of development will generate 6.74 trips. Therefore, each unit is assessed a fee of $485.25 for a total fee of$3,882. SITEERC.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Ei. ?mental Review Committee Staff Report . RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 4 of 13 Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per Average Additional Daily Trip. At 6.47 trips per unit, in accordance with the ITE Manual, each living unit shall be charged a fee of$485.25, for a total fee of$3,882, payable with the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Resolution 3100, Traffic Mitigation Fee, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) (6) Police and Fire Impacts: The Police Department staff have stated that adequate resources are available to them to serve the proposed project. They have recommended some features be built into the proposal in order to ensure the safety of the residents. Fire Prevention Bureau staff have noted the Code-requirements for the project and that there is a Fire Mitigation fee that will apply to this project. The applicant will need to submit a mitigation fee of$488.00 per new duplex structure. This fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation fee of$488.00 per new duplex structure prior to the issuance of a building permit. Policy Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) (7) Parks and Recreation Impacts: The applicant is creating eight new residential units within the City of Renton. Due to the:small size of the project site, the applicant has not provided on-site recreational facilities. These new residents will make use of the existing and future parks and recreational opportunities available within the City. The Community Services Department has adopted a recreation mitigation fee to mitigate the impact of the new residents on the City's park and recreation system. The applicant will need to submit a fee of$354.41 per new residential unit within the project. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a Parks Mitigation fee of$354.41 per new residential unit within the project (8 units x $354.41 = $2,835.28) prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Parks Mitigation Fee Ordinance, Environmental Review (SEPA) B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. XX Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment and A••eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment and Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Appeal Period. Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. SITEERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&E mental Review Committee Staff Report , RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 5 of 13 C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall install and maintain temporary erosion control measures to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the construction phase of the project. 2. The applicant shall submit a construction plan indicating haul routes and hours, construction hours and any traffic control plan prior to the issuance of any construction permits. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. 4. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per Average Additional Daily Trip. At 6.47 trips per unit, in accordance with the ITE Manual, each living unit shall be charged a fee of$485.25, for a total fee of$3,882, payable with the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation fee of $488.00 per new duplex structure (8 units x $488.00 = $3,904.00) prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6. The applicant shall submit a Parks Mitigation fee of$354.41 per new residential unit within the project (8 units x$354.41 = $2,835.28) prior to the issuance of building permits. SITEERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Er. .imental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 6 of 13 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 2. The applicant will need to pave the entire parking area in accordance with the City of Renton Code. WATER UTILITY 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$510 per multifamily unit and shall be assessed and payable with the construction permit. 8 units = $4080 2. Water service shall be provided by either single meter services per unit or per building. Separate taps and service lines shall be installed. SANITARY SEWER UTILITY 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$350 per multifamily site and shall be assessed with the construction permit. 8 units = $2800 2. Separate side services shall be provided per building. SURFACE WATER UTILITY - 1. The identified upstream outfalls shall be included in a stormwater conveyance system, tightlined, or otherwise conveyed to an appropriate downstream facility in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 2. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface. 9352 sq. Ft. = $1206.40 PLAN REVIEW - GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family homes and duplexes. If the square footage of the structure exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the required fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and two hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. AIRPORT MANAGER 1. The proposed project is located at an elevation of 391 above sea level. The project site is within the 10,000 foot Horizontal Surface of the airport, which has an elevation of 179 feet above sea level. Since the project is located within the Horizontal Surface area, aircraft will be flying very low over and around the project houses. Some method to ensure that purchasers and renters are informed of this fact by the seller/manager, is requested. Approval of this project constitutes a compatible use within the airport area. SITEERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Ei, mental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL L -LOPMENT LUA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 10,1997 Page 7 of 13 PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action XX Site Plan Review Shoreline-Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication,environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: .Drawing No. 1 of 1, Site Plan (Received April 16, 1997). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. F-1, Building Floor Plan (Received April 16, 1997). Exhibit No.,4: .Drawing.No. E-1, Building Elevation (Received April 16, 1997). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. L-1, Landscape Plan (Received April 16, 1997). C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31- 33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; The proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Element designation of Residential Multi-Family Infill (RMI). The RMI designation is intended to provide infill opportunities in existing multi-family areas. Policy LU-64 Development density should generally be in the range of 10-20 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project is at a density of 14.9 units to the acre. This density is well within the acceptable range for this area. Policy LU-67 Siting and design of new structures should be sensitive to site constraints and adjacent users. Provision of adequate buffers or setbacks or scaling down of building heights may be required to transition from Residential Multi-Family Infill designation to adjacent lower density uses. The site borders on a Residential Single Family area to the east. The proposed duplexes would provide a better transition to the adjacent single family area than would a more intense multi-family development. SITEERC.DOC City' of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&E nmental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL be vCLOPMENT LUA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 8 of 13 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The project site is designated as Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The proposed project is not consistent with the development standards of the RM-I zone as proposed. Duplexes are a permitted use in the RM-I Zone. The two areas of inconsistency are the location of parking stalls in the front yard setback and the gravel parking area proposed by the applicant. In accordance with the 'Code-requirements the parking area will need to be paved. The .development standards require a minimum front yard setback of twenty feet, a rear yard setback of fifteen feet and side yard setbacks of eight feet. The applicant is providing the appropriate rear and fr(.Int yard setbacks. Instead of the minimum eight foot side yards the applicant is providing setbacks of 30 feet in order to provide each unit with an adequate yard area. The RM-I zone allows for a maximum height of 30 feet. The proposed buildings have a maximum height, to the peak of the roof, of 25 feet. The applicant is proposing to provide sixteen parking places within the development. Eight of these parking spaces will,be in garages and eight are proposed as open parking spaces. The Parking and Loading Codes requires two parking spaces per unit for duplexes but only 1.75 parking spaces for per unit for multi-family development. .The applicant in trying to comply with the standards for a duplex, that were designed fora single duplex on a single lot, has located two parking stalls in the front yard and two parking stalls in the rear yard. The development standards specifically state that the.parking is acceptable in the rear yard . but does not make the same provisions for the front yard setback area. City staff,contend that the two parking stalls in the front yard.setback are not required in order for the applicant to meet the parking requirements for the proposed project. The parking stalls should also be removed as they are prohibited from the front yard setback area within this zone. 3. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The proposed project is adjacent to an existing single family neighborhood. The applicant has provided a fence detail but is unclear on the drawings where the six foot tall fence would be located. The applicant will need to install a fence along the east and west boundary of the project site outside of the front yard setback. The fence may be tied into the proposed buildings to create private yards for the residents. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan for the project site. Two of the proposed parking stalls extend into the front yard setback area. As staff has recommended that these two stalls be removed from the project, the applicant will need to submit a revised landscaping plan that demonstrates the landscaping plan for the full width of the front yard setback. The fence noted above should also be shown an the landscape plan. 4. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; There is a failed retaining wall that was made of railroad ties and has slumped onto the subject property. There are as many as eight storm water pipes that empty out onto the subject property. The applicant's plans indicate that these issues will be addressed by other parties. This work will need to be concluded to City of Renton standards prior to the final inspection for occupancy. SITEERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&E' mental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL LG vCLOPMENT LUA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 9 of 13 5. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposed project will be constructed on a site designated for multi-family housing that is currently.vacant. The proposed project will help to conserve area wide property values by providing a development that will be a transition from the single family neighborhood to the east to the higher density multi-family developments to the west. 6. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The applicant has provided a.single circulation system.for the project site that in reality could be two developments, each on their own.lot. This reduces the_number of driveways on Puget.Drive and will make for safer turning'movements in:the'public right-of-way. The applicant has not provided for a pedestrian only path between the site and the sidewalk along Puget.Drive. This means that pedestrian .would:need to use the driveway to enter and leave the site. City staff recommend that the applicant be required to provide a sidewalk or path along one side of the driveway between the edge of the project site and the'existing sidewalk so that pedestrians and vehicles will not be using the same access point. 7. Provision of adequate light and air; The buildings are well setback from the property lines and-separated from one another by twenty-four feet. This spacing should allow for adequate sunlight to reach each of the buildings and allow for adequate circulation of air around the.buildings. 8. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The proposed project should not release significant .noise, odors or otherwise unhealthy conditions that have not been addressed by the proposed sight plan or by existing state and federal regulations. 9. . Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use;and Adequate public services exist to serve the proposed project. The applicant may need to extend service lines as required by existing City Codes. 10. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The applicant has proposed a project that will develop a vacant piece of property that will be a transition area between existing levels of development on either side of the project site. This development and the maintenance of the property should help to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight. XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for the construction of four duplex structures. SITEERC.DOC City'of Renton P/B/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&E nmental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DzVELOPMENT LUA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 10 of 13 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 5. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Multi-Family- Infill. 5) Zoning: The Conditional Use as presented, complies with.the zoning requirements and development standards of the Residential Multi-Family- Infill Zoning designation. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: multi-family residential; East: single family residential; South: multi-family residential and West: multi-family residential. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) . . The proposal .complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Multi- Family-Infill; and the Zoning designation of.Residential Multi-Family Infill. F. Decision The Site Plan for Renton Heights Residential Development, File No. LUA-97-051, SA,ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for frontage area along Puget Drive to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. This plan shall demonstrate the deletion of the two parking stalls that were proposed in the front yard setback. 2. The applicant shall construct a six foot tall wood fence along the east and west boundary of the project area outside of the front yard setback. This fence may be tied into the proposed buildings to create private yards for the residents. 3.. Any work identified on the property to be completed by others shall be finished and in place prior to final inspection for occupancy. 4. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian access between the subject property and the existing sidewalk along Puget Drive. The proposed access shall be shown on the landscape plan. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: June 16, 1996 SITEERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&E mental Review Committee Staff Report . RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT L UA-97-051,SA,ECF ' REPORTAND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 11 of 13 SIGNATURES: ', .-",-,2-0-- 1/a,/,4o02------ e - 1.2 -77 //9 eC.Hanson,Zoning Administrator date —if, . Z° Michael D.Kattermann, Zoning Administrator date SITEERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&E mental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL LcvcLOPMENT LUA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 12 of 13 TRANSMITTED this 16th day of June, 1997 to the applicant and owner: Karl Best ' Best Construction 10117-159th Ave. SE Snohomish, WA 98290 TRANSMITTED this 16th day of June, 1997 to the parties of record: Rose&Raymond Saude 2019 Rolling Hills Ave. SE Renton, WA 98055 Teresa Copeland 2020 Grant Ave. SE#M205 Renton, WA 98055 David&Gail Dean 2007 Rolling Hills Ave. SE Renton, WA 98055 Elbido Rabang 2107 Jones PL SE Renton, Wa 98055 Vaughn Smith 2020 Grant Ave. SE#M301 Renton, WA 98055 Rolling Hills Condominiums C/O Property Concepts • 401 2nd Ave. South, #605 Renton, WA 98055 Edna Bagnariol 221 S. 4th Place Renton, Wa 98055 TRANSMITTED this 16th day of June, 1997 to the following: Larry Meckling,Building Official Bob Arthur,Land Use Inspector Art Larson,Fire Marshal Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal • Environmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 30, 1997, (15 days from the date of publication). Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. • Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor City of Renton Development Services Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 SITEERC.DOC City' of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Ei mental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL LI vELOPMENT LUA-97-051,SA,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFJUNE 10,1997 Page 13 of 13 • Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 30, 1997 (15 days from the date of publication). If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. SITEERC.DOC q1-UU I I sA ., iN� 147-Jf/, l 45 -tC) -7-g c 0e 7-- e a- or= i ae2 /r d 74iLs Cold elp4r� �c�6eT bRi v'E. b y D 1 bull Pt b2 'I N/3 L leffSpecr2c;Ai ERIEVIRD --r'' JUN 1 0 1997 BUILDING DIVISION • ..........................................................................::.:................ ....... ..... ...... ....... ... .X......AILING:::::::.....:..::.:::::::.:::::::.:::::::::::::.::�.:::,::::.::.�::::.:::.::.:... ..... On the 12' day of 3 LLht , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing devu Ntitt}tcviS • documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Dick Anderson Department of Transportation . • KC Water Pollution Control Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher Department of Fisheries David Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Sue Rumery City of Seattle • Duwamish Indian Tribe • • • Rod Malcom, Fisheries Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Rita Perstac Puget Power • (Signature of Sender) 1$ 0..k- er STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) • I certify that I know or.have satisfactory evidence thatc)49-ndi2n k. wee p/2- . signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for' the uses and purposes • mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (I l j7 �?� C?ii)t • Notary Public i and for the State of Was ' ton . C c Notary (Print) . MARILYN KAMC!EFF r`�ti . :. - My appointment expit MMISSION EXI-'iHHtS 6/29/99 Eh� Oh CI, grojefo 'Na ie: � • es ,. ,,, g is 9esIdev 1o../.. Levclopw\eKt Project Number: LUPh `q � _ OS I SA NOTARY.DOC CI7t OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 11, 1997 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on June 10, 1997: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-051,SA,ECF The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There will be a total of eight (8) dwelling units on the two existing parcels of land. Location: 1500 block of Puget Drive. Environmental Determination Comment Process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 30, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 30, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, Mark R. Pywe P Project Ma er cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Sue Rumery, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Rita Perstac, Puget Power AGNCYLTR.DOC1 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 a)This paper contains 50°o recycled material,20%post consumer 6 , CIT _L OF RENTON ..� 1 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 11, 1997 • Mr. Karl Best Best Construction - 10117- 159th Avenue SE Snohomish, WA 98290, SUBJECT: Renton'Heights Residential Development Project No. LUA-97-051,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Best: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on June 10, 1997, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with conditions. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Comment Process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 30, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 30, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. WAC 197-11-660 states that the responsibility for mitigation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project, any mitigation measure established by the ERC not directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. DNSMLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 fia _ 1 • ,I June 11, 1997 Page-2 Mr. Karl Best Best Construction LUA-97-051,SA,ECF June 11, 1997 Page-2- Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation)measures recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, Mark R. P " ,AICP Project Manager cc: Parties of Record: Mr. &Mrs. Raymond Sande; Ms.Teresa Copeland; Mr. & Mrs. David Dean; Mr. Elbidio Pabang; Mr L Vaughn Smith; Rolling Hills Condominiums; Ms. Edna Bagnariol Enclosure: I dnsmitr 1.41 • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-051,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Best Construction/Karl Best PROJECT NAME: Renton Heights Residential Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight (8) dwelling units. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1500.block of Puget Drive Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall install and maintain temporary erosion control measures to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the construction phase of the project. 2. The applicant shall submit a construction plan indicating haul routes and hours, construction hours and any traffic control plan prior to the issuance of any construction permits. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. 4. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per Average Additional Daily Trip. At 6.47 trips per unit, in accordance with the ITE Manual, each living unit shall be charged a fee of $485.25, for a total fee of$3,882, payable with the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation fee of$488.00 per new duplex structure (8 units x $488.00 = $3,904.00) prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6. The applicant shall submit a Parks Mitigation fee of$354.41 per new residential unit within the project (8 units x$354.41 = $2,835.28) prior to the issuance of building permits. The Site Plan for Renton Heights Residential Development, File No. LUA-97-051, SA,ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for frontage area along Puget Drive to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. This plan shall demonstrate the deletion of the two parking stalls that were proposed in the front yard setback. 2. The applicant shall construct a six foot tall wood fence along the east and west boundary of the project area outside of the front yard setback. This fence may be tied into the proposed buildings to create private yards for the residents. 3. Any work identified on the property to be completed by others shall be finished and in place prior to final inspection for occupancy. 4. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian access between the subject property and the existing sidewalk along Puget Drive. The proposed access shall be shown on the landscape plan. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-051,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Best Construction/Karl Best PROJECT NAME: Renton Heights Residential Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4). duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight (8) dwelling units.' LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1500 block of Puget Drive Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental del ll terminations. 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 2. The applicant will need to pave the entire parking area in accolydance with the City of Renton Code. WATER UTILITY 1. The System DevelopmenttCharge shall be at the current rate'of$510 per multifamily unit and shall be assessed and payable with the construction permit. 8 units= $4080 2. Water service shall be provided by either single meter services per unit or per building. Separate taps and service lines shall be installed. SANITARY SEWER UTILITY 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$350 per multifamily site and shall be assessed with the construction permit. 8 units= $2800 2. Separate side services shall be provided per building. SURFACE WATER UTILITY 1. The identified upstream outfalls shall be included in a stormwater conveyance system, tightlined, or otherwise conveyed to an appropriate downstream facility in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 2. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface. 9352 sq. Ft. = $1206.40 PLAN REVIEW-GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings,two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to ssuing a check. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family homes and duplexes. If the square footage of the structure exceeds 3600 square feet in area,the required fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and two hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. AIRPORT MANAGER 1. The proposed project is located at an elevation of 391 above sea level. The project site is within the 10,000 foot Horizontal Surface of the airport,which has an elevation of 179 feet above sea level. Since the project is located within the Horizontal Surface area, aircraft will be flying very low over and around the project houses. Some method to ensure that purchasers and renters are informed of this fact by the seller/manager, is requested. Approval of this project constitutes a compatible use within the airport area. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-051,SA,ECF The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four duplex buildings. Location: 1500 block of Puget Drive. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on June 30, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. Publication Date: June 16, 1997 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-051,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Best Construction/Karl Best PROJECT NAME: Renton Heights Residential Development • DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8)dwelling units. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1500 block of Puget Drive LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. PUBLICATION DATE: June 16, 1997 DATE OF DECISION: June 09, 1997 SIGNATURES: Gr gg Z m erma , Admins�r DAT Ci/f Depart e t nning/Building/Public Works (c 7 Sam Chastain,Admi strator DA E Community Service Department Jel:/// % - �� LeVWheeler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC Renton Heights Residential Development LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DNS-M Signature Sheet Page-2- Environmental Determination Comment Process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 30, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to,take further action would need to file a.formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 30, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-051,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Best Construction/Karl Best PROJECT NAME: Renton Heights Residential Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8)dwelling units. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1500 block of Puget Drive Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall install and maintain temporary erosion control measures to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the construction phase of the project. 2. The applicant shall submit a construction plan indicating haul routes and hours, construction hours and any traffic control plan prior to the issuance of any construction permits. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. 4. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per Average Additional Daily Trip. At 6.47 trips per unit, in accordance with the ITE Manual, each living unit shall be charged a fee of $485.25, for a total fee of$3,882, payable with the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation fee of$488.00 per new duplex structure (8 units x $488.00= $3,904.00) prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6. The applicant shall submit a Parks Mitigation fee of$354.41 per new residential unit within the project(8 units x$354.41 = $2,835.28) prior to the issuance of building permits. The Site Plan for Renton Heights Residential Development, File No. LUA-97-051, SA,ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for frontage area along Puget Drive to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. This plan shall demonstrate the deletion of the two parking stalls that were proposed in the front yard setback. 2. The applicant shall construct a six foot tall wood fence along the east and west boundary of the project area outside of the front yard setback. This fence may be tied into the proposed buildings to create private yards for the residents. 3. Any work identified on the property to be completed by others shall be finished and in place prior to final inspection for occupancy. 4. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian access between the subject property and the existing sidewalk along Puget Drive. The proposed access shall be shown on the landscape plan. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-051,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Best Construction/Karl Best PROJECT NAME: Renton Heights Residential Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8)dwelling units. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1500 block of Puget Drive Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 2. The applicant will need to pave the entire parking area in accordance with the City of Renton Code. WATER UTILITY 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$510 per multifamily unit and shall be assessed and payable with the construction permit. 8 units= $4080 2. Water service shall be provided by either single meter services per unit or per building. Separate taps and service lines shall be installed. SANITARY SEWER UTILITY 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$350 per multifamily site and shall be assessed with the construction permit. 8 units= $2800 2. Separate side services shall be provided per building. SURFACE WATER UTILITY 1. The identified upstream outfalls shall be included in a stormwater conveyance system, tightlined, or otherwise conveyed to an appropriate downstream facility in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 2. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface. 9352 sq. Ft. = $1206.40 PLAN REVIEW-GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings,two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family homes and duplexes. If the square footage of the structure exceeds 3600 square feet in area,the required fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and two hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. AIRPORT MANAGER 1. The proposed project is located at an elevation of 391 above sea level. The project site is within the 10,000 foot Horizontal Surface of the airport,which has an elevation of 179 feet above sea level. Since the project is located within the Horizontal Surface area, aircraft will be flying very low over and around the project houses. Some method to ensure that purchasers and renters are informed of this fact by the seller/manager, is requested. Approval of this project constitutes a compatible use within the airport area. • • / & . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ' .POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-051,SA,ECF The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4)duplex buildings. There will be a total of eight(8)dwelling units on the two existing parcels of land. Location: 150D . block of Puget Drive. ) THE HAS DETERMINED ; THAT THE OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ' ENVIRONMENT. I AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. PM ON JJALICUJAZ OR APPEAL ' . THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:0 PMUNE 30N1997.BYD0 THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. q J• rani �vue.ul.�� `A SE I81h•`; p v�� �4 A 1, !-1 .►�: a uL°ri;�1 if i;�►i — lig .y ��i: if 4 F- 611R�-I l ,'AM.E.L.,ILVkI!, 17—,,. --11—1:=-—a\„,-\ ;]Iln;1 81 111 1 • `W71„1.1!! w Zri:� ,- fu4is �e _ 3 • W..* e _=T ,1 . v'ed I . • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT • SERVICES DIVISION AT235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION I Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper Tile Identification. - . CERTIFICATION' I, . -114,i1 itt.C.Bovi • hereby certify that 3 copies'of the above document were posteddby me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on 'wed 13,(qil Signed: SkYIGL 9afJYI . ` . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) . .. A,,certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that �i4-'lac Ck S' K4j ed.this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and)v • ntary act for the uses • : `�,,,anU'4&i(poses mentioned in the instrument. a."• `l at . 6O /7- 7 77 - l - '"" NotaryPubli in and for the Stale o1 hinglon "II01, : �. ' T',• :: - ; :.. Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF My appointment eV1ISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 NO TAR Y•OOC NoioncE0 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION' POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-051,SA,ECF The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four (4) duplex buildings. • There will be a total of eight (8) dwelling units on the two existing parcels of land. Location: 1500 block of Puget Drive. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. xxx YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON JUNE 30, 1997 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, JUNE 30, 1997: THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. • P' S , 5. c co SE 181h"i �, H�_� 4. ll ..-4 c.9. gja O ) ,4 l awf� =AI1_124'y P11cE 1'•% i '. +. I A sill 7\ - 4114 , VA. 11 -\ i_ - livi/11 - = :, fgp ,_ 1.1J- ,z )y kilt sI2.1hS1 ( Iff, - ll-F.11f_4 f- h - r 1 !I!II _ �t ,Q 11■ii, —,- IA. .. — _ __ 1 su. t ,tra _ - _ \IN r2,__ _-, )_. • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. • DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION . !IiiC!':nii ;Oplease include ahe ro oON.Q.mop3..1191 ogii ,fo:r.:, ro :er; le:identification;::=: >;::::#:::,i,i:::;: CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: June 3, 1997 To: Mark Pywell From: Kayren K. Kittrick, Plan Review Subject: Renton Heights Residential Development LUA-97-051, SA, ECF EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER - There are existing 16-inch and an 8-inch diameter water mains in S Puget Drive. There is at least one existing hydrant. Fire flow is modeled at 2400 gpm in this area, with a static pressure of 65 psi. SEWER-There is an existing 8-inch diameter sanitary sewer line in S Puget Drive. STORM - Existing lines in the street are across S Puget Drive. The natural flow is across the property in a north-westerly direction in sheet flows and infiltration. There are as many as eight existing 4-inch storm lines using this property as an outfall. The developer is proposing a combination of infiltration and piping with bioswales for water quality. STREETS - S Puget Drive has all amenities existing. A new joint use curb cut and some repairs to bring existing facilities to code are required. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $510 per multifamily unit and shall be assessed and payable with the construction permit. 8 units = $4080 2. Water service shall be provided by either single meter services per unit or per building. Separate taps and service lines shall be installed. SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $350 per multifamily site and shall be assessed with the construction permit. 8 units = $2800 2. Separate side services shall be provided per building. SURFACE WATER 1. The identified upstream outfalls shall be included in a stormwater conveyance system, tightlined, or otherwise conveyed to an appropriate downstream facility in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 2. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface. 9352 sq. Ft. = $1206.40 BESTGF.DOC • j TRANSPORTATION 1. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per Average Additional Daily Trip shall be assessed. At 6.47 trips per unit in accordance with the ITE manual, each living unit shall be charged a fee of$485.25, for a total fee of$3882, payable with the building permits. PLAN REVIEW- GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and any traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. 4. Any work identified on the property to be completed by others shall be finished and in place prior to final inspection for occupancy. CC: Neil Watts BESTGF.DOC • PROPERTY SERVICES FEE REVEWV 97- C - Z I DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 0 PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 0 OTHER APPLICANT: =,5 T C�r�r S j 2�r r 77 r fN( RECEIVED FROM ' ( .,;3X2 JOB ADDRESS: ,(5- 6 /�c— 2 z S 7',, r j17 WO# te) NATURE OF WORK: j7�,�i z'�c c GREEN# El SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ❑ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE ❑ VICINITY MAP ❑ NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES 0 FRONT FOOTAGE ❑ OTHER ❑ VESTED 0 NOT VESTED ❑ This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review# dated 0 PARENT PID#(subject to change)_ SUBJECT PROPERTY PID# 2.0)-.3 c/ /Y) i- c ❑ King Co.Tax Acct#(new) It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER Special Assessment District/WATER Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER --p-- Joint Use Agreement(METRO) Local Improvement District Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE O Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) ] Never Pd SQ. FIG. Single family residential$850/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park Apartment, Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x jf `y //O 8G . 0(7 Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq. ft. of property (not less than$850.00)x Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter(2,800 Gem threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) El Never Pd Single family residential dwelling unit$585/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x Apartment, Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x g $ Z�C , ov Commercial/Industrial, $0.078/sq. ft. of property (not less than$585.00)x REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New- Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) El Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x All other properties$0.129/sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less than$385.00) / .5 Z p Z PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ a , (ye' Signs re of Reviewing Au rity DATE *If subject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. **The square footage figures used are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only. c:!template/feeapp/tgb EFFECTIVE July 16, 1995/Ord.Nos.4506,4507,4508,4525,and 4526 fD� City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Tja sty COMMENTS DUE: MAY 2, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 18, 1997 APPLICANT: KARL BEST PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL WORK ORDER NO: 78206 DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: 1500 BLOCK OF PUGET DRIVE SITE AREA: 23,384 SQ.FT. I BUILDING AREA(New expansion gross): 23,384 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4)duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8)dwelling units. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Y OF C R RENTON ON APR 18 1997 IDEyti-OPIVIEN7 5craveC DIVISION B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS . S( 477?9CE/6Z) F072/o_ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 74 `aDate /�� Director or A horded Representative Sin re C Rev.10/93 oev� .00c n . . ...::::.:.::..:...:: ..::::. . ::.. .. .... . +;%i.✓,r :�: �awroA>:y�V ,riC»% � xiclaYE.�'?%?Q!�f2?L'te7�iyrw»oe�" rp: -r ..°:4 T f' sPxQR Y.. Ti T e" FEE .. .. •...m:. , ... FL%O::?04lalw.h%'YMr1I!�1i.0%^.^%JR4+A..P �, • .. .. ... lirtMiW R))?.. Project Name Best D a p l e xe 5 Project Address I5 0 0 h l l�cuJ e7� D v Contact Person Kay I 8e 5 L Address 1011-7 15c1-“' Act SE, t,aelrcuilsh (.071 cl3210 Phone Number (206) - 3 314 - CI 3.0 Permit Number LUA - '7- 0 5 Project Description Coiistvt . 14 du fie x )Ic45 - tole, f r/ u ii t S Land Use Type: Method__ zoo Calculation: Ap-t (220) ["Residential I ' ITE Trip Generation Manual Pete? 30 ❑ Retail 0 Traffic Study ❑ Non-retail 0 Other ><atc: 6.47 pg,, uh, Calculation: u c(u,l 'trip.5 ( 6 ./10 ( 8 ) = 51. 76 tvie5 At 175 t �p ( 5i.70 ( 475 ) .= / 3882-- . • Transportation Mitigation Fee: 3882. `'0 Calculated by: • '• 4% /\) Ji122' i1 Date: Tulle Z- Mg Account Number: Date of Payment • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMEN TAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Su,v-Fev P 1 (i is MMENTS DUE: MAY 2, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-051,SA,ECF 1 DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 18, 1997 APPLICANT: KARL BEST PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL WORK ORDER NO: 78206 DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: 1500 BLOCK OF PUGET DRIVE SITE AREA: 23,384 SQ.FT. I BUILDING AREA(New expansion gross): 23,384 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4)duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8)dwelling units. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Llght/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet crT'OF RENTON RECEIVE.r2 APR 1 8 1997 �kVr�vr-hbhv7 vlCl g DIVISION B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Alt-No M1 a 6//97 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 74(edis /,/07 of Director or Authorized ReSign resentative Datep DEVAP- 2• Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �V(GU)r (j, 6 bMMENTS DUE: MAY 2, .1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 18, 1997. r r Y OF FtENTON APPLICANT: KARL BEST PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELC F.�,�...... PROJECT TITLE: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL WORK ORDER NO: 78206 DEVELOPMENT APR 21 1.997 LOCATION: 1500 BLOCK OF PUGET DRIVE bUUli-V..%..a e'I 4 iaDN SITE AREA: 23,384 SQ.FT. I BUILDING AREA(New expansion gross): 23,384 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4)duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8)dwelling units. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major information impacts impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary • Earth Housing _ Air • Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation , Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation • Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 6 /,(ouo b47- 6// f7 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 6 �� M7 Si r o Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVA DOC Rev.10r83 RENTON FIRE DEPT rrAu City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVAERitSerFT REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: cwt._ eut4\ Egon COMMENTS DUE: MAY 2, 1997 g 'Li_r,-,L W , r D APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 18, 1997 APPLICANT: KARL BEST PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL WORK ORDER NO: 78206 DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: 1500 BLOCK OF PUGET DRIVE SITE AREA: 23,384 SQ.FT. I BUILDING AREA(New expansion gross): 23,384 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4)duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8)dwelling units. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet /0a / \10r .1 ,CI /c)t t �l B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 10I C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS. .f- See di c:Ld G1,1M e4/5 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addi onal information is needed t. • .pert),assess this proposal. C014 AIT /-//7 a V,7 Sign tur of Director or Authorized Represent a Date DEVAP Rev.10/93 1 "S. O ® , CITY OF RENTON 1,t7 re FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: April 21, 1997 TO: Mark Pywell, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Renton Heights townhouses, 1600 Blk. S. Puget Drive Fire Department Comments: 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single family and duplexes. If the square footage of the structure exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the required fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and two hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A fire mitigation fee of$488.00 is required for each new duplex structure. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City of Renton InterOffice Memo To: ReeiPieat.. 1i'1a yk, f�4.4,,e 1LQ From: Kayren K.Kittrick ,A3 Date: May 1, 1997 Subject: Renton Heights Townhouses In light of the changes to the paved parking areas that are required, and the neighbor's concern about the existing drainage onto this site from Lots 28 and 29, an amended storm report is required prior to this project proceeding. My concerns are: how the off-site surface water will be picked up and the location of the proposed outfall; whether the 5000 square foot threshold is exceeded with the addition of pavement for the gravel areas; and an explanation on the intent of the bioswale and how it is functioning as a water quality facility when nothing seems to be directed to it. In addition, information on sanitary and water services locations is needed to determine whether separation requirements are met. Size and location of the irrigation meter information is required as well. CC: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: tkiits COMMENTS DUE: MAY 2, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 18, 1997 APPLICANT: KARL BEST PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL WORK ORDER NO:. 78206 DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: 1500 BLOCK OF PUGET DRIVE SITE AREA: 23,384 SQ.FT. I BUILDING AREA(New expansion gross):.23,384 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4)duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8)dwelling units. A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ruZIA-cam rzC aa'C--4- 740 /2 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • G'CrY u��u-� . 3s4, 5 2 a& /1-7-1,6,„,,,,,,-„____,r, j'7,,:d____i 2-7, 7 J , C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 1-ze cr/A--. 10 ? ' - We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. c- 74'(-e-Lq°51 ti� JJJ"`«<"' 9/ i/97 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative /�{/ Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 City Or Department of Planning/Building/1- Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ,rFoort COMMENTS DUE: MAY 2, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 18, 1997 APPLICANT: KARL BEST PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL WORK ORDER NO: 78206 DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: 1500 BLOCK OF PUGET DRIVE SITE AREA: 23,384 SQ.FT. I BUILDING AREA(New expansion gross): 23,384 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4)duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8)dwelling units. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Llght/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation -Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS The proposed project is located at an elevation of 391 feet above sea level . The attached Airport map shows that the project site is within the 10,000 foot Horizontal Surface of the airport, which has an elevation of 179 feet above sea level . The drawing also shows the extended centerline of the airport runway. Since the project is located within the Horiz- ontal Surface area, aircraft will be flying very low over and around the project houses. Some method to insure that purchasers are informed of this fact: by the seller, is requested; Approval of this project constitutes a compatible use within the airport area. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this ap !cation with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a '' nal informs n needed to properly assess this proposal. 7 ‘La GeAEL Signature ., Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.b oC Rev.10/93 E.4-...;*735:-_:_-_::::::::_i_.--.5:33.7.-FM-E.::::::--_-___-.:::::: Vi :E.E:_:33:::_:_:__::::.]:-:.:-:::::-::::::;_-_:::;_-_:.::::::::::::;-_--lar , a . ...II..j17, j . k:- . :::::::::::::!0-_-_-='5:::-E-:=1:-E-::::::---x-----7--EFE:::::-..:71-7-_-:::::-:-::-E-::::::::::::-7:71:::-:1:::::::::::-.:_ _-_-:-:.:_:::::-::-.7::::-.:-:-.:::::::::::::-::.:-::F7,am:L-—1.1. ..1 I tin I Ki Ill\ •1/4-IL%..16/ '11 I k'-'1141,r ro : •rii • ====_==-:-. =_====__= =___=_ . =' _ - wit ,. go ; r, A;::_:::E:_E'::E:'::K:::.:E:E:E:E:E:Er.:::::_:K:H::__3K::Z:_:_E:S::::::_:_E.:_E.::_:._:_::::_E:_E:_E::::EE:_:::::_::_::._:.:-f._:_:.:::._:F._:.:_::_:_:-:f._:_::.h_:,-c wit . rid, , ,Ir., : .. .::::::EE_EE_EE:,-E_:_..t ra li, .._.• ...., It FloLi -.1-:::-..--.:-:::-__ -_===-=== ====-====-_= ====- i K Ts 0� o10 !: /Off \ yitst,,, ,Z, Q . w 1 ENE _=_r = a=_agit:=' __=_ - __-,2. -14 1 fiil Tyyyppp! a��� �� ====_-__==__=_=====___=_== _=_-------=- \� (NC,Irr, Tjalit-> �."cam �+-" ./ �a��o, ==__� _ __�_�==_' _____ lam W,t�ll+� ..BI �► ���.`� a �1�D�o��►_=-===========_= =_- a d I .ail Z� 10.17. 1 , ,r- .. �' ®® C ._131 it r__F___Nrn FE t_...E arm..t, -_-_ -_-_-_.:i.,-..;.;..- Dem .... . ____ ,i.f-'11 \'tit' ���a{.a isini `� )11)11fiumErm&lia, n% N `in ®' .: i 4t,_ eomu1x i 411.1 , .. EL r 2 ; • ......„..,1=,..,,,,, A -. ....la . \44,11 gi 1 ill 1011-1 .4r, _ PP- A q-Cill i 't: \ `lid oiLil 1iiil.:. �. / ,;d-Do.,.., ct,A. _Ammo li , VIP 7i-W- -MN IIP I,,, vivoir,rvir- ,[ii 07i; 1 .. :--— `1 fIF1 w....,-. 11_ , r__, ,,), 69r/ \ 614 pi 1-,-..r.lr. .-p i . ,.., :, gp,NA.cl 1, 7,,,, aintriii, ,,, ,,,--irr,....____________ ,_ 1.164,4,--.Air © =reiN., \id 41E14 x 1 ''''' nWIZ • to Kr., ._. _ idie ,,..,1(1t ). 1. 01011* ‘INSUffrt.,-; - riclillgift 0 Zr g - ---\ ,, top..„, wok, .„. man., Wei!air il.,11 I � �-r ',NT r-t IX , ;) '-461144011 A role � � )--1:61 c•7Pdsill . / Id p) a .. \---- /-;,,c\ _, ." ir .4i: „„„„06...„.* ...1 r. Ic V\"tit!/ vi: ii:M a r1):L Aral elfial v ; ._. a_. ,, % R,__A_„ . 1 ro I .111kil 71 VI ,.._i ,) iN s t:, 0441/ A to * - ' ' . r - 4 _i_, _ itt) �� � �,.-��1�4 l � 77x1 /;_ n ' 4 co co col i 11/011 _.„,„id, _, li 11•L.II w ' ' R � ' M v , now �.�_, ■ • CO , R � Y� M M M clui/ - • n � t ,11t . 11-• I i\14,41. v 1 V..1.1,...ii-E-- kw II.6 II ii: drn tIPP-' t , 0 4, W M 0101\ . .0 A.!II • tee'- +\1`joiti Y , �� 11-i j i . ,_,\: 17-1, ,\I- ii I. .-... .ermsa... . i *4 1 ..-, -4 \, 1 im p,..?._ I.U.P ' - OM II Ns t 1 R_•IVi' E 1ttl m . ,...1--- / g, . 1 ,,..1 ti :killiiirlA EP 1 I AIRPORT chnical Services D. Visneski A i r n n r f- f Y 7 n ri i n ;cY f p s i ri n d i n-n i City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1c6LLce..., COMMENTS DUE: MAY 2, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 18, 1997 APPLICANT: KARL BEST PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL WORK ORDER NO: 78206 DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: 1500 BLOCK OF PUGET DRIVE SITE AREA: 23,384 SQ.FT. I BUILDING AREA(New expansion gross): 23,384 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8)dwelling units. k pl ,,, p,fi `1 A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS PI Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts. Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services t Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ,_,Se, 6z,e-viacie_S B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those are•s in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio erly I information is needed to prop assess this pro•o • ' Signature of pirector or Authorized Representative Date I 1 DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/83 City of Rent )epartment of Planning/Building,, Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) 7.36 police calls for service estimated annually, based on the size of the units. This is based on a city-wide average but generally the calls for service around this area are quite high. Crime can range from theft from motor vehicle to auto theft, and simple assault to residential burglary. Construction Phase: Theft of building materials during this phase should be a concern. There tends to be a heavy juvenile population around this area and improper security during this time could make this area a target for thieves. During the construction phase, security fencing and lighting is strongly recommended to deter crime. Any and all building materials and tools will need to be locked up when not in use, especially during the hours of darkness. The use of a private security patrol of off-duty officers is recommended as auxiliary security if you experience problems. Lighting: Proper lighting is recommended at the front and sliding door entrances, as well as over the dual garage doors. Additional lighting at parking Spaces 1, 8, 9, and 16 needs to be provided to protect vehicles not secured in a garage. Locks/Security Devices: The front door and the door leading from the garage into the duplex needs to be solid core with single cylinder deadbolts on each with no less then a 1" throw when bolted. Peepholes should also be provided on each door. Sliding glass door in the back should have an auxiliary lock(anti-lift/slide)to deter possible criminal activity. Fencing: Fencing should be lattice or chain link(or a mixture of both)to provide adequate surveillance for security of property and residents. Solid panels of wood provide criminals the enclosure they need to burglarize a home or vehicle. Fencing around complex should be extended to cover the north end of the complex as well. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW. SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Covrtvuc.. a '.A.1(OCOMMENTS DUE: MAY 2, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 18, 1997 APPLICANT: KARL BEST PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL WORK ORDER NO: 78206 DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: 1500 BLOCK OF PUGET DRIVE SITE AREA: 23,384 SQ.FT. I BUILDING AREA(New expansion gross): 23,384 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4)duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8)dwelling units. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts impacts Necessary Earth ✓' Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet CITY OF RENTON RECEIVE) APR 1 8 1997 DEVrA-Urivszisa i ocreve, DIVISION B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 5.6/L.S WI e/00X / /e EQ C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where itional information is needed to pro rly assess this proposal. ,,(:7W, Signature ofor or Autho' Representati Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 y CIT:` OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • June 4, 1997 • Mr. Karl Best Best Construction 10117- 159th Ave. SE Snohomish, WA 98290 Subject: Renton Heights Residential Development LUA-97-051,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Best: The information you provided has been accepted by City staff and they have provided their comments • based upon this information. The date of June 10, 1997, has tentatively been set for the completion of • the environmental review. The administrative site plan review should be completed within a week after the completion of the environmental review. Although the need for the additional information has caused a slight delay in the processing of this application, I'm sure you understand the need for a complete record to be available to the decision makers. Otherwise, the project could be subject to appeals that take a considerable amount of time for the applicant and City staff to respond to the issues that are raised. If you have any further questions regarding the processing of this application, please contact me at 277- • 5586. Sincerely, 9/0// ,'"' Mark R. P ,AICP Project M ager • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer 4$ ,Lk-.-) CITY )F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 6, 1997 • Mr. Karl Best Best Construction 10117- 159th Ave.SE Snohomish, WA 98290 Subject: Renton Heights Residential Development Dear Mr: Best: The enclosed comments have been received from the Plan Review section. As City staff can not complete their environmental review comments until the information requested is provided, we are placing this project on hold until the information is submitted. This will stop the time clock for the review of the project. Once the requested information is accepted by staff, we will resume the review of the project and establish new dates for the Environmental Review Committee meeting and the completion of the project review. If you have any questions regarding this matter or the review period for this project, please contact me at 277-5586. Sincerely, Mark R. Pyw ICP Project M ger • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton,Washington 98055 GI This naoer contains 50%recycled material.20%oust consumer City of Renton InterOffice Memo To: Reeipion W1a.,•k. From: Kayren K. Kittrick „AO Date: May 1, 1997 Subject: Renton Heights Townhouses In light of the changes to the paved parking areas that are required, and the neighbor's concern about the existing drainage onto this site from Lots 28 and 29, an amended storm report is required prior to this project proceeding. My concerns are: how the off-site surface water will be picked up and the location of the proposed outfall; whether the 5000 square foot threshold is exceeded with the addition of pavement for the gravel areas; and an explanation on the intent of the bioswale and how it is functioning as a water quality facility when nothing seems to be directed to it. In addition, information on sanitary and water services locations is needed to determine whether separation requirements are met. Size and location of the irrigation meter information is required as well. CC: SQ .. �,.. .�T....O.�....5... ...1�►.Itl... ...:.. ..I.M. ..�.#�.... .:.:.......�li:.. ...�".. ...... ............... ...:.... .:.....�.�.1.. ......... <.:.::.;:.::.«»<;;; ......::::::;:::<:::><.,, :"'`. :' '':' '.'"':«'.<' '.°'wit in.3.OQ:fe.ef<c� :::th.e>su ect..s.t ..................................................................... PROJECT NAME: P)P1)4OI1 )J9hd APPLICATION NO: -1 .b 51 S�'c The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER ace • .• y' RECEIVED NCO • • *PR 16 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RLNTON (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (Continued) • • NAME • ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL • NUMBER • • ( Applicant Certification �/ BCv I, a , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: 0 City of Renton Technical Services Records 0 Title Company Records 0 King County Assessors' Records �e�' pATTE�;so Signed W.e.,_,-)2 Date q/a - PASSION.F• A%O_ Applicant.)--- �� P�`� oTARrN. '� NOTARY o• --- : ATTESTED: Subscrib d a w rn before me, a Notary Public, in and fokjt g to i a,in,: .e residing at on the 1 S"µday of t `,:e? 1=`:' •C Signed "* A S # (Notary Public) (,'J.0-{k- eQ ('39-4 �i`aat.t i7'wer'.«<r aile`''"><'< ```. ''<?''rm Ica Io... a.e .;:.. }:. r:. .t at...o#.ces.:�..:.t...e. ..... .¢...ed.a.. ........#.................................d..to..:........... ::»::>:>:: ....::.:.......:. ......�:".�.::::::.:�::.::.::.�: : : Date'.:... ........... ............ .........�..........:;.;;::;;:;:�!:.;:�;.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;;;;;:.;: :;i;};:y::};y;i:::••?ii?ii'.i.i::.i:v:^:?:C}iii:?iiiiiiiiii:?i4:4i:4i}iiiii A?"CE'T:>:.>: u '�riCe. ::ands:iivfir�•€:::..'fiir : .;..,.,a,:+vta........u�...c:...... . ... .......Yt .e....t'at�..o.........a........ #Uri........... .......... ..... • listprop.doc � REV 07/95 • 2 • I. ' • ` . NOSHO JAMES Z 309999 FORR2EST ALICIA M 589999 2020 GRANT AVE S VM-302 2020 GRANT AVE VM-303 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 �. 739890-1400-00 739890-1410-08 • MACIAS PATRICIA R 699999 MANGOLD DOROTHY M+ 059999 2020 GRANT AVE S OM304 CHANDLER,JEFFREY S+MAUREEN A ' RENTON WA 98055 2020 GRANT AVE S 4:M305 RENTON WA 98055 �ry 739920-0230-02 739920-0240-00 ' � FORRAS PETER C1077 ' 1 KARP REIN 249999 2030 ROLLING HILLS SE 1 2024 ROLLING HILLS'AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 i 1 RENTON WA 98055 ;, 739920-0250-07 739920-0260-05 0 SMITH BONNIE JEAN 2D9999 WIBMER TALETTA M 609999 • - 2018 ROLLING HILLS SE 2009 JONES CIR-SE RENTON WA 98055 ; RENTON WA 98055 - -739920-0270-03 739920-0280-01 WILSON JOHN M JR E0281 ALDREDGE CARLOS D 639999 2017 JONES CIRCLE SE 2025 JONES CIRCLE SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 ___ 739920-0730-07 739920-0790-04 - - L> CAMBRONERO THOMAS A 0514 GEIGER JAMES H C0577 1928 JONES CT.SE 1923 JONES CT SE RENTON WA ' '98055 . RENTON WA 98055 739920-0800-02 739920-'0810-00 ' ALSAGER LEE L . 379999 MARYOTT•DANA G R0675 1929 JONES CT SE ii '2001 JONES CT-SE RENTON WA 98055 �' ; RENTON WA 98055 .Z..Y - 739920-0820-08 tl' ' 739920-0830-06 DEAN DAVID M 463977 ; : WERNER MARGARET L: 170125 '' 2007 ROLLING HILLS AVE SE 2013 ROLLING HILLS AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 739920-0840-04-.- 739920-0850-01 `) • SAUDE RAYMOND A PENOVICH JOHN N 2019 ROLLING HILLS AVE SE: 11832 64TH S RENTON WA . - 98055 SEATTLE WA 98178 -, • .- . - '-i r'- • DELCAMBRE DANIEL J+HULLY M 079999 ATTERBURY RAYMOND E0681 - 2020 GRANT AVE S, 01.-106 2020 GRANT AVE S 11L-201 . •) RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 E0881 O . .• - :. ...._c . - 98055 739890-1160-00 739890-1170-08 AP: JOFOON DONALD G 799999 JACKSON JAMIE L 309999 H= _-- —' 2020 GRANT AVE S 11L202" 2020 GRANT AVE S L203 ', : ) RENTON, WA 98055 i RENTON:WA•. 98055 HI 489999 ; • -+.' 739890-1180-06 739890-1190-04 r� ®. ANTRIM.MARTIN"C+V-DIANA 654582 BOWIE-MELROSE ANNIE P+CLIFF539999 '� ---- 1 19801 97TH AVE S 2020 GRANT AVE S -11L205 -,. °, RENTON WA - - .98055:- i RENTON: WA 98055 `85007 �_ 1 739890-1200-02 739890-1210-00 ' ) � ��� • RYAN DEETTA+STEPHEN A 6D9999 KANDI FREDERICK• 490794 F_-'_--:_-._� 2020 GRANT AVE S ill_ 206 2020 GRANT AVE S OL-301 ' I RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 )9994 ®• —= - - 18055 ) 739890-1220-08 • 739890-1230-06 �_, GRANADA TERESA .J - 539999 - GALLAGHER K G E P J E1279 ;< . 14054' SE 208TH ST 10640 DIXON DRS i , ) KENT .WA- 98042 SEATTLE WA . 98178 ,'--x i566 :: )055 ) 739890-1240-04 739890-1250-01 + 1 CALDART BRAG J+HAWES,LEANNE379999 - CUSHMAN.VERONICA R 289999 =Z'------•- 529 NE 82ND ST 2020 GRANT AVE S ;.'L-305 j - - ) SEATTLE-WA 98115 . RENTON.WA 98055 . .,t') 999 �.:. • - -- 178 ) 739890-1260-09 ' ' 739890-1270-07 . ;c:3 " = 1 ` MCKELLIPS CLINTON"8 211278 WOLFF CHARLES E+MARGARET 369999 2020 GRANT:AVE ,S L306 .. 1708 SE 16TH PL . ) RENTON WA. 96055 j RENTON WA 98055. " j 739890-1280-05 1 • 739890-1290-03 . SANDSTROM DAVID I- 720397 i'; DAVIES JOHN W+JEAN 309999 • 2020_GRANT.AVE S ;1M102 ia 2020 GRANT AVE S 11M103 ) RENTON WA 98055 j.y; RENTON WA 98055 . • 739890-1300-01 --- ;' 739890-1310-09 -�---- - . MONTGOMERY KAREN 309999 i"� GARCIA MICHAEL 0 109999 2020 GRANT AVE S M-104 2020 GRANT AVE'S ;M105 RENTON WA 98655 ; RENTON WA 98055 �'-''' -- -sus: -7=2 =T - - - - - ) 739890-1320-07 — • --i.;1 739890-1330-05 `.' ' KAGE GENEVIEVE 230794 CANTIL •CHERYL ANN - 489999 ;', 2020 GRANT AVE S 11M201 _ �. � ; 14300 SE 171ST WAY C-1 ' == RENTON WA 98055 I,'! RENTON WA 98058 � .1'• 739890-1340-03. 739890-1350-00 ' �•"" , r SIPINEN STACY L 412304 HART LISA L 279999 i:+, 6007. 5TH AVE NE 2020 GRANT AVE S ;. M.-204 ) SEATTLE WA 98115 IgiI, RENTON-WA 98055 +K , ,. ---a-^r--:.. � .• 5;; 739890-1360-08 739890-1370-06 r-•.$ COPELAND THERESA A- - E0481 SMITH VAUGHN. B • 3N9999' 1®'e r ; 2020 GRANT AVE S 11M-205 ` ' 2020 GRANT AVE 1111301 r';:;; 1I;7. ' RENTON WA 98055' I_' RENTON' WA 98055 !oil' . ,3 c7'U-vjvu-v; I.?7 7U-0711J-1.� � yr. .;.•. .� �••+f BAGNARIOL EDNA M+JOHN A 651628 BOYCE RUSE A 0280 1 ' 221 S 4TH PL 2020 GRANT AVE S 41201 ' • D RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 4 , 739890-0920-03 739890-0930-01 0 ' KING CEDRICA W 679999 ! ! BERGH HELEN L 0280 2020,GRANT AVE S VI-202 . -' 2020 GRANT AVE S UNIT J101 ;i, RENTON WA 98055 l : RENTON WA • 98055 ' • - , 3' 739890-0940-09 739890-0950-06 KNUDSEN ELISABETH 3D9999 FRANK THERESA 169999 • : 2020 GRANT AVE S 1J-102 2020 GRANT AVE S 4J-103 RENTON WA 98055 ' RENTON WA 98055 ' 739890-0960-04- • 1 . 739890-0970-02 I • - MORTENSEN M TERRILL+JUDY-NE1N9999 KING JAMES A 369999 i . • 5774 SE SEDJWICK 2020' GRANT AVE S OJ 201 - PORT ORCHARD WA 98366 i.. RENTON WA 98055 ' • i . 33 739890-0980-00 739890-0990-08 COOK GARY F+PAMALEE A 509999 LOCKHART CYNTHIA. A 609999 2020 GRANT AVE S J-202 ' , 2020 GRANT AVE S 4J-203 RENTON WA 98055 H SEATTLE-WA 98055 Q 3 739890-1000-04 739890-1010-02 - - - • NAKOWICHUK WESLIE-A C1279 WELCH BRADLEY JAY 519999 2020 GRANT AVE S J204 2020 GRANT AVE S 4K101 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055� . 3. 739890-1020-00 is 739890-1030-08 ., NG SUSANA•S 399999 NOROSTROM. FREDERICK L 2N9999 8122 NE 161ST PL. . 2020 GRANT'AVE UNIT K=103 - .. BOTHELL. WA 98011 ' RENTON WA. 98055 739890-1040-06 739890-1050-03 i HOLLAND BLANCHE W 279999 i JACOBS MICHAEL E. 549999 , . : 2020 GRANT AVE S K-104- . 2020 GRANT AVE S 4K-20104 . • RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 " ; ) 739890-1060-01 739890-1070-09 ZEMANEK GREGORY J 289999 BRESSAN CYNTHIA S 449999 �"' 2020 GRANT AVE S APT K-202 H 2020 GRANT AVE S 4K203 ). RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 r .,'., .... u .:.. .. .: ..-- ..-. ..'i a_I�..._.�'-!1:F-.. -y:.:•....-..���.--�--.�-_--.--:�.. :ss:_.vu=__.,.�.�-_- '..�ai`v„-.fir-_-�.r..-_..,-L"..':. 734890-1080-07r 739890-1090-05` COLE•REBECCA L 62ZCO2 'ti TERRY NARY KATHRYN 849999 �_; 2020 GRANT AVE S K204 2020 GRANT AVE S. UNIT L-101 • RENTON WA • ' ): 98055 RENTON WA 98056dii. 739390-1100-03 _r i 739890-1110-01 '/ :. DOHRMANN.JAY D 169999 • .HIRSH ALflERT' I530508 2020 GRANT AVE SOUTH ;'L-102 ,' 2020 GRANT 'AVE S �'L-103 _:; `= )'I RENTON WA -98055 , RENTON. WA . 98055 ,. r "T If�r-.-•a"-� -i,fir- ...-., a -ems...-«;r.. .�^;'�•.-�'-..i+s-.�..`.^'^'-�.....-.,_-e-.r.-.-.T f.":.R-'crFT�c-_-++_-a-_. 739890-1120-09 739890-1130-07 ' " • �: ' SITKO BARBARA 569999 '' DAVIS RHONDA- M. . 119999 _`: - 2020 GRANT AVE SOUTH VI-104" ky' j 2020,GRANT:-AVE'SOs.�.L.105 �';.;. )'' - RENTON.WA' , ' 98055 r''i RENTON'WA' 98n55. f ai=` �" LEE MICHAEL 3N9999 SAGAFI JOHN X 595029 "' :"•''' - '-"i'-• 2012 SHATTUCK .AVE S 2020 GRANT AVE S 4E203 r. , RENTON WA 98055 :i RENTON WA 98055 i , 7 735690-0680-03 I" 739890-0690-01 ARY.BRENTLEY S _ 509999 r'1, HILOENBRAND CORRI LENEE 409999 t:,..,.•. 2020 GRANT AVE S VE-204 r'' 2020 GRANT AVE SO UNIT ;,F101 • RENTON WA ' 98055 . RENTON WA 98055 - - ; • 739890-0700-09 �. y r ~739890-0710-07 ti • t''' CHACE:NANCY.K - 592053 PILON.LAURIE A. 909999 �h t r 2020 GRANT'AVE S VF102 I: 2020- GRANT AVE SO ,iF103 i ' ,, RENTON WA 98055 RENTON.WA- 98055. Jk. 739890-0720-05 �— ——T`� "`��I. 739899-0730-03 MELONE RUSALYN'J 056621 I": LEWIS DARRELL W JR 499999 626 W ELM AVE "'' 2020 GRANT AVE S fF201 EL SEGUNDO CA 90245 i, RENTON'WA 98055 L- 734890-0740-01 739890-0750-08 I ' , . IIO. TAKA+NANCY 219999 WHITE_DARREN L 379999 I•' 1715 E 70TH AVE 2020 GRANT_AV S ;F203 y TACOMA WA 98424 RENTON WA 98055 739890-0760-06 . 739890-0770-04 TAKAHASHI ISAO 531196 ;HI GEFERT BARBARA R 2N9999 ,• 11645 SE 208TH V1 2020 GRANT AVE 'S UNIT VG-101 r ' KENT WA 98031 � ; RENTON WA 98055 -0 739890-0780-02 739890-0790-00 1 ` LEE-JACK' SIK—WING: 069999 .; HINTZ ALBERT.IAN 350817 I® 4•+•, LEE JOHN SIK_ON d 2435 130TH AVE SE ',, 2020 GRANT AVE UNIT G102' f BELLEVUE WA 98005 10 yY, RENTON WA 98055 H. • 739890-0800-08 ��`(y 739890-0810-06 --. * . VANOENBOS CHERYL 649999 ii; 'GOLDBERG STEVEN M+MARIANNE 039999 : it +. 2020 GRANT.AVE ;.G104 . 02020 GRANT-AVE S G201 1 . . xx'a., RENTON WA 98055 I d RENTON WA 98055 , 1)-•• 739890-0820-04 739890-0830-02 VO. GIANG T+PHAN NGA T+NGUYE469999 O'BRIEN JOHN L+MARY E 713686 • ' 2020 GRANT AVE S G-202 . _PO, BOX 1317 1 RENTON WA 98055 ISSAQUAH WA 98027 I . PA". . ~ 739890-0840-00 739890-0850-07 1 HUFFMAN RICHARD E GUARDIAN 001320 1-: SHAEFFER LESLIE L 429999 . • 21738 SE 262ND PL I 2020 GRANT AVE S VH-101 MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 .41 RENTON WA 98055 I ': 739890-0860-05 1.' 739890-0870-03 SHOKRI CYROUS 029999 NEWTON THOMAS M+GEORGE T 2N9999 ®r. ... . 2020 GRANT AVE S UNIT H102 2020 GRANT AVE S VH-201 - RENTON WA 98055 .:i RENTON WA 98055 pi 739890-0880-01 739.90-0890-09 <,.. SHOCKLEY JACK II+GLORIA E 909999 JONES DAVID O+SIGRID P 409999 ,.. 2020 GRANT AVE S VH202 2020 GRANT AVE SOUTH I-101 . - • RENTON WA 98055 i,'" RENTON WA 98055 Ar; } _ - . ^ uLju/c pnILLI~+LCuA 4 ye oExxxo kuuti.�r c E� wxNm c 350142 2020 nnxwT AVE S o304 +279 83mo AVE 3F nEw7Ow �x pnonn / esL�svUE H� 9noo6 ^ ` , 7a9e9o-n4^o-o+ � 7*9oVo-o4on-ul � mOOns Eowxno E 579999 � p nn�En oGasRT � On�*9 / o 2020 nnAmr AVE S Vo-loz 2020 GRANT AVE 5O olns 1 x�nmn xx yanyn 9oo�5 / � ` 7a989o-O*60-89 739890-047n-o7 BROWN ROusRT o 3n9599 NELSON T*Omxs J yO9n9� 7734 3 LAKEn[oGE DR i� 2020 GRANT AVE 5 �o-lon ' | -� / SEATTLs WA 98178 i� pEwTow x4 98055 739890-0480-0* 7�pa9u-n�oo-os ` POTTER ox[oxT 030075 ! SMITH 4wTOwIx n 072184 z+o ss 37x pL ` 2020 onxwT AVE SO '110201 ` ' ~�"."" °° 9o055 � . REn/un wv ,ov,n � 739890-0500-01 739690-0510-0e / � . FAuLxwsn vIcuIs L soyoys /' *LrwAw nzcxxno K 20*9n9 2020 nnxwT AVE S :o-uoz . zozo anxwT AVE S wnaos nsw7ow *� vaonn | nswTow x4 9eonn ' ..' ' ------------ ---'--- ---- -- ----' -----^�----- --'-'-------------T / ' 7nyano-onzo-u7 } 7»9n9o-onao-o5 ' � vAss xnLswe J 432911 ��� cLxnx nxyYT0v sn 6099*9 2020 GRANT.AVE 3 l`o-j04 i ' 2020 GRANT AVE S PInZo5 � x"n/un WA , 98055 vEn.un wx 98055 ' _---- _�_ ) '~'~^"-"'-"-~~ 739390-0550-0" > 2 —''TAD CINDY ' 683594 | - ^ -- --- > nswTom wx 9onss � nsnTOw WA ' 98058 � | ` � 739890-0560-0" / 739890-0570-0" _ 2008 LIwcOLw cIncLs ss � ['� zoonn SE WAX no 509999 > xsn/uw xx 9e055 MAPLE vxLLsv x4 gooaO ra9oeo-onon-n4 / 7ova90 ns9o-oz � > onoww mx7T*sx x sYs '�� - q�p LAFn«mx*z vlCTOn m zw2347 | / eswrow xx 98655 nswTow WA 98055 ! ` ` > 739890-0600-00 � 7sye9o-oazo-ue . nzLLxxw x pLoYo ' 2n�6lo � nEY�s �o5� �+�z�Y r zae999 '- | 10053 *4T* AVE s znzn nnxmT AVE s "s-101 '! ^ ` ssArTLs *A Yal7a � nsxTOm w» yonss' � ��. � 739890-0620-0* � 7*voyo-naso-n+ � Jowss xx7xLssw x zo9��o ' covs��o DENNISv �s��un ` � oozu GRANT AVE s Vezoo zozu GnxwT Avs � nswTOm HA 9a�s5 � nEwTOw HA 's �s-zns 98055' | ' 739890-06+0-02 ' 739890 -----'09 ---] ' LOcxwoou pswwY LEE 409y9' 9 KnuuxxnT'wxumz TsueSA 539999 ' znan GRANT AvswoE 5O IVcln4 ` ' 2020 snxwT AVE SOUTH IVs-zoz nswTOw WA 98655 p nsmTOw HA 98056 , . . w �-xu/ /+KtLLiL c o/a15 9 u*bwm xuw//s u+Euwx L eoyyy 2020 6nxw7 AVE 5 Xx-an* 202o Cn4wT AVE I "'9-zol nswTow w^ yoo55 �sw7ON w� 9oo55 ^ / � 73e890-0200-0+ , 739890-0210-02 oOnAw u4TxnYw *51658 | c*zww Jxwsr p s1279 _ HOLLY _ '4 1744 S HANFORD . """""' ' "" ,o^vu SEATTLE WA 98144 ' 739890 u22o ou |� 7398 o oeao� --,,- --'--' -'-Y' ' -'-''' ' ^^'`'~~ ~~ 98055 RENTON WA 98055v 7s9aoo-o24o-oo !� 739oen-u25o�u3 / sy*os woLAwo 69999* !� aVTLso oAvzo L 9o9999 2020 GRANT AVE S to 106 zoZn sn^wT AV 5 "18201 KswTom Hx 98055 ` nsw7Ow *A 98055 , ~EL""" ^""" "-"""^^,° . »uv,v� rnEL,S uExE^ +39999 aZ42s �4sxo pL SE . � aozn GRANT AVE �uzos � m^pLs vxLceY wx ven�a ! � nemTow w» yooss~ 73e890-0280-07 - 7sYu90 ozsn-nn � os wxLT wzCnxcL 489999 � oswAo nosS x Cnzao aozo nnxwr AVE s 2204 2020 GRANT AVE s '113205 � nswTom WA 98055 nswTow WA 953055 � 739890-0300-03 7s9nvo-oazo-nz po*sLL nuaY x 4zvg�n ' xxnezwG7ow u p u oxww J L � ozo oa4m7 AVE S �nzo6 _ 2020 GRANT AVE s �C-lol �vo«� - � � ncw7Ow RENTON WA 98055 ` � 739890-0320-09 '�| 739890-0330-07 | ^ . woYLs cunTIS L 179999 � pCumxxnlwl oAwx p+w»nLswE o4a9e99 zozo GRANT AVE s wc zoz � 2026 cexwr Ave c-103 '' } � nswrow, wA 98055. nsNTON WA gnnss ---������--' ------ --'-- ---- - --====-=�'----- - i � 739890-03+0-05- � 73e890-0350-02 c*xppsLLs000GLxs s y59999 ) cOoMas CLxnEwce Lvws Tnsr sesoor . zozn sRxwr AVE s C-zo*- znzo nnAnT'xvs sooTo ""c-201 � nsnTom WA 98055 / nsw7ow w« Yaosn �k} � 7seayo-noao-ou / � /syoon-oarn-oa ' cAnTsn 7� �s n ��q xusm�x°' *7n��z ` j HOOD sTxeL x 809999 ' osswAxE ws ws216 i�. 2020 snxwT AVE souTx �czoa � nswTow w�� yoona / nsnTow w4 9au�s | ` ' '�' / �7a9a9n-6s8n-ou 7s Yoyn-oaeo-o4 � ' p»oL�mAomi' n .�' 45999e ' P»TpIcx xwwA r zzos»o u»a« »R uoxo on*w7 AVEs �c_sn� . ""' nEw7ON N� ~ | � 98055 ' -'-- - '^^ ~^ . 73*890-0410-00 ' MOxxMMED A5zr ' +599Y9 Jo*wsow sco/T L 199999 ' 2020 GRANT AVE 5 c�502 12702 6+TH xv S ` RENTOw HA 98055 |.,' oEuT7LE x4 98178 bO/JU3-U 4U-U1 qu:vrA:G r. _..: {a-�.i KWAN CORINA 479999 PRASAD AVINASH 689999 ,,A:� f.`" 2106 JONES PL SE 'd 2100 JONES PL SE R+:, RENTON WA 98055 �% RENTON WA 98055 `{ +", 289999- j CAMPANELLA & MARTINEZ CO279 : �,1 F 692820-0010-00 ,.! 692820-0020-08 �. t KIM SUSAN C 1615 S PUGET DRIVE VA . 1615 S PUGET"OR UNIT" 8. 1- , RENTON WA 98055 `j RENTON' WA 98055 - ' ) .692820-0030-06 . 692820-0040-04 i KING STEVEN M CO279 - 4 QAVIS TOM C 709999 1615 C S PUGET .OR C ,i _ 1615 SOUTH PUGET DRIVE VD RENTON WA 98055 RENTON.WA 98058 ilv - - - - T��� _T , -- - - — -------•=-..::..__-�..-.._..-,_..... ;, --,--_:,, _..H__ -,—:- --;- - _--: - -- - 692820-6050-01 iI C1079 c: "739890-0010-04" 1 "' JONES CHARLES H �: ROLLING HILLS CONDOMINIUMS 501570 i 1615 S PUGET OR VE 1:.I C/D. PROPERTY CONCEPTS INC RENTON WA 98055 600 1ST AVE 0626 `' - -_- -- -- - - —_ _ --t... SEATTLE WA • 98104 1 73YUASAODONNA2 — - - 332355 ,. "' 739890-0030-00 . SHELTON IDA 0580 �:. 2020 GRANT AVE S ;;A=102 �.1 2020 GRANT AVE S A103 ? RENTON WA 98055 1; RENTON WA 98055 ., 739890-0040-08 I,i 739890-0050-05 } FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE A689999 '`j CLAY SUSAN L . 049999 IV 135 N LOS ROBLES AVE. `. `2020 GRANT AVE S VA-105 PASADENA CA • 91102 f"' RENTON WA 98055 _______________ 739890-0060-03 _-` r 739890-0070-01 BARTHOLOMEW KELLY SCOTT+TRA299999 I � ARP SIEGFRIED A+M KATHLEEN 2N9999 h°- 654 E.JAMES PT OR V5H 2020 GRANT-.AVE 'S- VA-201 1:.;=. 1 MURRAY UT. 84107 i_.' SEATTLE WA 98146 _ - is -. • 739890-0080-09 ——�+ 739890-0090-07 NELSON JOHN W+MARILYN T 589999 �"- FARMER LAURIE & JEANNE 503773 , ,. 22423 243RD PL SE 18305 152ND AVE SE MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 RENTON WA 98058 739890-0100-05 739890-0110-03" : AESOUIVEL JR. BENIGNO C+MARI369999 BIRCH WILLIAM 009999 .: 1 20437 97TH AVE S '1 2020 GRANT AVE UNIT A205 . KENT WA 98031 RENTON WA 98055 141, r 739890-0120-01 739890-0130-09 COPELAND THERESA A 100010 I , PREPOTENTE SR ARTURO 0 389999 �' 2020 GRANT AVE S M205 : i 2020 GRANT AVE' S VA-301 1 ,,. RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 '®-" 739890-0140-07 , 739890-0150-04 �`® . ANDERSON JUDIE A 6D9999 '.' VILLANUEVA R 8 & SAN LUIS E063.602 .. • 2020 GRANT AVE S 0A-302 5823 20TH AVE-S " ' RENTON WA 98055 II SEATTLE WA 98108 , 739890-0160-02 "; 739890-0170-00 PERALA RAYMOND A 7999'99 . 1- MCKINNON"ANTHONY E 691806 .,. H 2020 GRANT AVE A-304 I•' PO BOX+ 18171 RENTON WA 980F9 CFATTIF WA nog o �S • — - *. . 0` ' ---'...-.__ .. n, i.1:7:Y:'^.• ,,a:l_'. '.:2.:'L':n,.,..,,f:V.,,,x,_-:.':t"' ,1-.1 lit:•:..... - ., -,,..,!.s..S.:r-,...t Nt'._k:. :-_.,..,...':t,:. .. _.. .. " ii{ -...._ •:��_r• ,�.,, ::r� �;'<-aa:.•r,%ate•^:�-r�.a�•rr.3-:Y�-,r,��:.� -.:ri:,_„ ,.t F—x..rr�r � taass^:\t;e>��a �:ri�•J•.9:.��ur.:sz�x�•r�ne=*-�.:.:rsr. .A.:7 .2�1� � , ie _ Rlj " .,.:`?:Y.: L"SY7'=r[hrT' n;Cv-�9.1'.�it+Twil.2iLY'Sbf.:."951::Si.�':�^Pt}S.Yini�7C: i .SEtiv'.'(+,n'! ._3...:Y_e .2Ti:::5:'T;c.'.`f.�:fi'ti:".^_0.�tiM."T.: -_. ..G:=d<?` - d\+m_ • • . ,•�••:_-•"�I'•y...i v'i,i1:4>:SYn 37... ::::1'r..S?,�^x i'�::e x7!.i..:>t73.1t,:• -"r.:;� .a ::63fn':,:utY:,C. . _.:di_",:r•7;t:.'.:4'. .fi".�".`,'::::.r,:,'2"-,:+":3=LYYiS•7.1i$Fr.. �.. .3..::r.y- •rF:�' • Y: .. - ;i _..: _x ix:x.::: -cr,iw; ..tazs.+.qa au`::',ecalt.':.t.>tvrs, m:4.::.a:ar:� ter,••;- 5 :h. .ec,;:::c:'-,,.r.e::,r;:::,s•:r,Vc- . . . _ :'t int ....,_._.,- i......�5'c"..:_.;.-_ ..;;,^-....:2•:.i:: :iC`.:.\:'bSi3.i,V._a:i.Fh:,' .c _;4f%:_^.i..d.._.....`.b1,.!:ti=Y-,.3:. .... .... - -.._•.._.':\'.'":...�:�i:z; :.....^. .'3.oi,1!::i.:,- eY L,r r. �k�' - • 1t. {<>t is;<3<i,< >4<a4> ;ooc>t ac�*44<>aYa;<;<Y;c>; ,<s,<<>>4>; }>,<•'<4a47>,<a4 >!<><>' 4 <>t,!;< <nh <,c a4a'<fc>;<>'<;<*;<; ,<>;<;a '<a4>t <;c>;c*a'a4 >4 cs4>, ) ' BATCH NUMBER: KE 'l' COMMENTS f'..:' ) * CUSTOMER NAME KARL BEST CONSTRU Ili'. —r rrr rrrrrrr rrrr rr,,,,,,r'rti-rr•s>f r. .. •<. 202305-9013-00 ! 202305-9016-07 1..,....—. ,„. - PUGET SOUND POWER &LIGHT CO231676 . PUGET.SOUND..POWER &LIGHT CO231676 , • PROPERTY TAXES PROPERTY TAXES 1 PO BOX 90868 PO BOX'.90868 ' BELLEVUE WA .98009 ; • BELLEVUE WA . ...... .......... 8009 I_ .,:: �: .,i J--'---- — 202305-9056-08 j ' 202305=9065-07 1 JACKSON KEITH O+MARILENA A 999999 . PUGET SOUND POWER &LIGHT' CO231676 _ ' ' 1506 S PUGET DR PROPERTY TAXES RENTON WA 98055 ', PO BOX 90868 ' ti„ • ' 1 BELLEVUE WA 98009 ®'. ` 667305-0010-06 667305-0020-04 HOANG NGUYEN' T - 0179 i'i RABANG ELPIDIO R 1278 , , 2101 JOKES PL SE H • _ 2107 JONES PL SE )' RENTON WA 98055 l.,j ' RENTON WA 98055 ��'. ' 667305-0030-02 1.1 667305-0300-05 ��, • CORSILLES ADELAIDA+DIONIOS0969.999 (.j STRICKLAND CINDY F+MARCUS F619999 2113 JOKES PL SE � . 1716 SE 21ST PL' �:: :."= ) ' RENTON WA 98055 r RENTON WA 98055 E®,=: \ ,`cY O Li n.3 + IIIIR4 • VP: re NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4) duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight (8) dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) meeting date, Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative decision. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of-the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. 1 41 IF ,r,,,,,,,,, ,,,c_ rn �, l SE nth■ :m j` a Ir 14 UM e ♦4 ,:):fi lk. _ k t, t> w e•Ae- rGpol '►�I►�: Ei =ii i a�i kli t t", E. `D&�,� 1E I I:1 sT '„ Mt ._. _, • 64th ,T -- '? - '•:if � S ?_7th ST u =a '�' 1 \1U1.03 0"tint ‘41/0) --* - — li p ., [How ie, in , . .o,c-- it4, s. ill = ,_ gr, ,..., <n `I _ GENMALOT.DOC �.i ,2, I I `1�. 1 I� .�,_ mum ■ T'� �llllll� ` L ,MNO M OM' II' . — E1: • i. i • PENDING APPLICATION • . I PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks epvlronmenlal review and site approval to construct four(4)duplex buildings.There would be a total of eithl(9)dwelling units. GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit _Preliminary Plat _Short Plat ' Conditional Use Permit _Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval • I XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use _Other . . -Pe Fill 6 Grade Permit _Shoreline Substantial _Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. • Comments will be accepted any time prior to Environmental Review Committee(ERC)meetings,Public Hearings,during Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative decision. For further information on the application,or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications,please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. . • • i e ,payy) f� (/S SA .t Ina, oil 1/19 . • • roci 2 eE '..�CI i . »'.�\ L1LLLLI I IJ .1� • . r NT ii �Iu^. ( 'f.-i Ill 411 'illI L_..I . • ` ;2/In;I 1 11 1 • Y/I'r r IPLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CAWNG FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. .I CERTIFICATION • I, Skie447 JJ,GIGSd' , hereby certify that 3 copies-of the above document • were posted byy me in .3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . . ri l ICI, I°I'f1 • Signed: Saila t . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) , ) SS COUNTY.OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that iiiJPY •f0 ''Korn) , signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and vol ikar�sa`aidot�he uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. = ti;-'QS-• ,-s'••:(.4 . n • Dated: jtl /q 7 = .� - Notary Pub- in and f r he Stiaz 2rs, V433,1.irgt_on ,r Notary (Print) MAR G-192E ,.:J rct u,/4`r,2 • My appointment expires: 4t/t /9k • NOTARY.00C , NOn . . . ;NO-TicE. PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RENTON HEIGHTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT/LUA-97-051,SA,ECF . DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks environmental review and site approval to construct four(4)duplex buildings. There would be a total of eight(8)dwelling units. . GENERAL LOCATION: 1500 block of Puget Drive PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat Conditional Use Permit Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use Other • Permit Fill&Grade Permit • Shoreline Substantial Other . Development Permit • The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton'City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Environmental Review Committee(ERG)meetings,Public Hearings,during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative decision. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications,please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. J_ 4\ • VF 1 . V F'. N rt �.r =:9�'1A1d• iiit SE 18th;;rep „mut& 0 a. 0 Al kik■to Wei �• • • • 1g irtk • ;-.WS qi 1 . - • i 011tir • 1 .., --- • vs I ---, . �\ #V0 / , . F 64th ST -Y . .. .- lti I — v 0 . ,, ilil S1/thST :I1. .111 II "�.VM " 1`1111'■�_ -- , `� .111 � rn� � _ t -l'PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN'CALLING FOR`PROPER;?FILE IDENTIFICATION ?>': °;:': r - z _ 4 T1 C�Z :`OF_._RF,NTON .y, r. 4' . •13U1A"nin� ldin P=Plan ubli cWorksD- - e artmen t T�— g g/ P %Greggmmerman P E.,Administrator .:.':,' ;Jesse Tanner,Mayor.•:., ..., - .... - ---::.,',..:-:: ::-„April 17 1 7' ar est Mr:I< rl B 'Construction •• :._ _ 'Best - _ '10117 159th Avenue SE -98 90 = _ S o -1591NA- 2 •nh - .�r ,r; T. %•, ..':':Renton Hei hts Residential Develo`ment - - o'ect o tIJA-97= 51 SA ECF - - - ,. °Pr N 0 J ��Dear r-"Best:� - M _ f• E::p 5t•,:- •••The.-Development;Planning :Section:,of;the;.City of Renton has'_:determined,that the :sub'ect a lication .is com lete'.accordin r'to submittal_'re uirements"and therefore :is ` .-;'• :• _ - _- J PP. P _ 9 _q - - - c ie4 ..,::.;.".,.......,_:., a ce ted for.�evi w. P - ; ."`It is tentatively scheduled for,consideration by the,Environmental Review-Committee on:::�.`: '. •'' - ,.. .. May-.1.3,..1997. Prior to that review,;you will,be notified'if any additional information•is` 0 o . ue .:rocessi our a .,licatio•re wired t c ntin in n•:� - - 9 P g Y pp a:`, •,Please contact me at 277-5586 if' ou`have`an' uestions:' "` ;Y Yq = •'Sincere) Y a I ICP. .M rk R:`P A - •P o'ect Manager : r ,y. -5" c, • • - - - .' 0 : Vf' • -tic J_t" _r ''-. a :Q J(.. ..... .....�,;. . te: .t? r :_ .:fig, , • r. � — _- - .-..._—_-'_.-—_•_.•__•_- -- -_.- -- -- -,. ` h i ri_ "t n�9 055 f. ?isM1 ue`Sou l '-;`Renton fi�Was . .. .. .. . . ... . ., �`� 200•Mlli°Aven ° , ��,. -- •--- - ...�� .�` �.,,,,.�. miner _.--�—_-__- <CITY OF,. NT:`:.,.><<s?<"'.>I{«'::<s < '>`<< ':<[> << <?' s.{>< :'.'`if> `•>>i'>'i[ ?> >>">< > ..:.:::...:. ,11,11,111:1 SION::«: >::»:::::;::.:>«:»»>:::;:::::<:::>::»::>::»::>::;:::. :<:::::>:»::::>>:::::::::<::;»:;::. <:: :D�U1':IVI.EfVT:>S E.RVI G:�S:.D.I...1. .. ......... ... E t::::: ; ; .c.:. .. 1 .. : . ... :.: .:::..::.:„:...: . »::::::>::::»::::»::>::::»>::>::::<:<:::::<::::>:::::: S l:� 0 ...,,••••••••••........",""""--"...••••••••••••••••..•••••••••••••••........................................................................................................ ................. ,,,,,,,,,,...................................................................................„:„:::::::::::::::„........::.::::,::::::::::::::::.:...:,.:.:.:.:.:.,.,.:.:...:.....„:.....:................................................................... .><•>=>iPRO.P.ERTY<:O.W.N.ER(S ..!!!!•:!!!:::.•.•>i•>•>.!!:!!!>.•>i•>.•.•.•i•.•i•.•.•i•.• €• ..: . :-:. ROJ.E.CT..INF:O.RMATI:O...„ > > «> >......>•... :; ne l;egal''owner'' lese attac.•ar add no'el�• .............................................. ......... ........ .. .... .... ..... .. . ... .... ... :k.:8, :i.i. re in m 01iii#:...Re!fro.:..::.::::P:. •p!...a.: :::::::.:.�h•::gi.i :::: . :::: :o�'ariecl<N1asYr.�A������li��ati n.•f ..e h.o'wriesti <•'••<<: <.><'.; ><••••>'•<••:��•.<••:>•<•<••n t . ppc _..........._............. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: y� �,� � NAME: ' id p j fie6`61�j ( ctoi- ik IIJ C Re l��q/ 11 J ti./�/t/ 4j��'l PROPERTY/PROJECT A /N:� C�` ADDRESS: L, 16xx P — Dr-ADDRESS(S)/LOCATI LV � ) /0/l`1 /s7� f4 tit s ,..: -e P U( V V�'a i CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): . t-3 parcel NO. aOa..,o5- 9/' ea3 v o9 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): f/ (. aj �„i_ , 4 33 4-9 1 3 o. V :f: i �"P:P:LI:>:: ' .::::: if::o . er:€• . n o i er:•<•<•<•••::•:••:•>:•:: . • PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: multi-•Fc ,1ly Cnf=1 COMPANY(if applicable): .,EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: e.5-- Co 3 ruc l'On TAM-r ADDRESS: 13930,5 D,COMPRE-HENSIVE-PLAN^MAP=DESIGNATION (if applicable): N CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: 6r)Mhn . 61`6 igIO niF-, . .. TELEPHONE NUMBER: I I ' i �/`�/p -9113CI. �^ ���� PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): v( l'J 0,m ...................... .. ...................................................................................................... SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: , l'kftr / 5p_e a- c%��° y0/a,/ /nctp . • . Cd 19 COMPANY (if applicable): • i Al,P-OJECT VALUE: 6 ain-e Gts Gbove e $/ 3 000--(properly on l>1) ,,.i. -(pr©/.r t P d bL ) ' ADDRESS: IS THE ITE LOCATED IN THE A IFER PROTECTION AREA? CITY: • ZIP: R CEJV D 1 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? No 159% TELEPHONE UMBER: i • DEVELOPMENT Cl `(GF PLATO�NN� ING !�E7! • _ : .r:) <>_< < >:: : < < << .;:; :: :::::: :.:..�:. ::.::::�: : AL.;..DE.S.CI >:: ,<:: :; OP:ERT€Y>€: /�tta:ch> se . ar:oriel 'e`ea�<if>ne:c'ess.a.::.:).:::.::...............:.::::.:...... Imo+-•* Z - STIR 202 305 lox Lic ` 149 01- 2 o-f- RZeniem Short Plot---. Olio a . . 275-79 kec. NO. 770?A 0 QO i) SD 11af DA-F- for 51 V . 4-43 - 20Z 305 -Mc I-0-1-- 1453 Lo- 3 6-P gen.40n Sho v+ Pico-No: 275- `7 ? Rec. NO. 'NU "720g017 5 D Rai- 1)AF- 1°prS(.0 .:�:::::;:>::>::>::>::>::>::>::::::;>::>::>::>::::>:::>:::<::>:»:>::::>::»::::>::>::>::><::>::::>:::::>:::::::>::::>::<::::>:::;:>:.T:YPE .O.F»AP:PLI:CATfO: '&:F ......................... ...... ........... ..................... ... . Th `-`'C A a ..... determine...f e.e5' gei.;i<_:` < ,i: ' >` ">•>``<<: << ` ````..he`ck<al[<aI'rcation�<t: es.. at.a I ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ — LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ . _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ l ,G{, _ FINAL PLAT $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ _ ROUTINE VEGETATION _ MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ - _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ 50,U REVISION $ :::«NAFFIDAVIT>:0.E WN RSH .... �� ��• '.... � �� ..� � .� ��: � .����� � :e� are that�am����� �check� �:���:•the�owner�of.theproperty� � ��involved��in this..a application, the �� • I, (Print Name) kl 1r I3, '}',d cl I (pleaseone) p _ authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respe tsetraetaand correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. hilri j: Beol--- . �,°°lr,�PATTr�,s cy �' �° •�S510JV E�-� �ES:�: Subscribed a • s or to before me, a Notary Public, in and «+ • S -.the Slate of A /r r-siding at (Name of Owner/Representative) 9 �0 TA R y on the j 5 day of /� 'ter t ,� • - 1Mi i ��C RS7r e �n ' ir °°�nPUBL10� : it...,;,,,..............._ (SiatyXe o caner resentative) ��„.,/0,�3 1�0)•' r ( aeF °°° °°�:9' atyre f otar Public) T® .;:.;:.;:.;>:.:.;:.>;;:.:: :.;:.::.;:.;::.;:;.;>::.:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.:.;:.:.;:.;:.:.::.;:.;::.;;;::. :.;;;:: ec o>: e c b it . .ff.,):< ii !><> ><<<>'« >>< <<s < <`> ' >< . ............ :>.: :> •.:<::.::�................. .. .::.�:.;:.;;: ;: ::. . .:::.. .:::< . ; :: :::» : >� >::>::::LLA::>>::PP::»::::::.P,::>:<:»:::P;:» : ::.;;;;;RU11/IP> <U«:><<><°:;:: :`<: ; ::: ::.::::::<.:::::.Clt....�lle..Numbed.......................�:.�................ Cl= ...�A.:..R.....SHPL.:::.:CU.::.:.......:.:..:.::::.::::..:�..::::::TTSP::.:.:.:..:.:...:::: :................., BSP>'?''.: {;> P':<»`>''>' >'< > ``.. ?>z< » '.. ::>::::::::>::::::::>::::»::>::r<:>:::::::<:>::>::::<:::>:::<::<::<::::<:::>'.::>::>>::>::::::>::::::»:::»�.�.'D:<:a:::W»::>:FP. .D::>::::>: . ;::>::>:: E::>::M> Ps::«:BS C i!ii: ::::::::::::.,:::::::: ::::::::.TQTAL:..FEE.S. .. .:�:�).�r�?, O.TAI,::P.O.STA:..: :..:: ..! ...::..�..: ..:.:..:......:...:.. .; ....:..::.:.:...:::.:........:..::::::::..:.. liiiii!iiiiiiii!!1!iiliailii.iNFiiin!;,E. ::••••••••• ••:..:.:......................... . . ......................................................................................... ....................... MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 9/96 KARL J. BEST 10117 159th AVE SE Snohomish, WA 98290 (206) 334-9430 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE - ( 11 Copies ) The project proposed for application is located at: 15xx Puget Dr . Renton, WA Lots 2 & 3 . Both lots lie parallel to one another on the North side of Puget Dr. The lots are of equal size measuring: 75 ' wide and 155 . 89 ' in depth. Both lots are currently vacant and have no improvements . Both lots are relatively flat and have no wetlands , water bodies or steep slopes . It is my opinion that no existing structures will have their views obstructed as a result of the proposed buildings . I am proposing to construct four, duplex buildings with two buildings on each lot . The project will be refered to as "Renton Heights" . All four buildings will be exactly the same. The following are the dimensions and land use: Building Height = 24 ' Building Sq. Footage including garage = 2, 607 sq. ft. (Townhouse Style) Lot Coverage = 2 ,576 sq ft. (two bldgs per lot) each bldg. = 1288 sq.ft . Total Square Footage per lot = 11 , 625 0 Total % of lot covered by Bidings = 22% Parking totals eight spots of which 4 are in the garage. Outside of bldg parking totals = 720 sq. ft . Driveway (Access) equals 20 'x 138 ' which services both lots . Half on each lot totals = 1380 sq. ft. per lot . In conclusion, 4, 676 sq. ft . of the total lot space of 11 ,625 will be used by bldgs . (2 per lot) , parking, and access . This leaves 6,949 sq. ft . of open space. All buildings will have back yards , and a lot of landscaped areas achieving a very aesthetically pleasing site. FODETOID (a 1997 DEVELOFMcN PlI�NNI G CITY OF F;ENTON Karl J. Best 10117 159th AVE SE Snohomish, WA 98290 (206) 334-9430 CONTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION - ( 11 copies) The project " Renton Heights" is proposed to start constuction June 15 , 1997 thru December 15, 1997 ( 6 mo. ) approx. from start to finish (all four buildings) . The hours of operation will be 8 :00am-5 :00pm M-F. Occasionally work may need to be done on the week-ends between the same hours . The transportation routes will be up the hill heading east on The Puget Dr. to enter the project and the opposite to exit the property. repstty- measures taken to prevent dust and mud will be to cut a drive off of Puget Dr. and gravel back to bldg. site . The project size will not require continuous trucking (at most on a few of the deliverys will equireeee maybe two trucks a day) . Most days the only activity will be approx. workers reporting to the job site and leaving at the end of the day. Workers will be parking on the job site . In short no traffic will be affected by this project . Noise will be regular construction noise, (hammering, sawing, etc . ) . No loud music is allowed on site. I will not cause and noxious characteristics . 011 A °''e 000'10>- 1I SEPA for CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICE SECTION A. $ACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: RENTON HEIGHTS TOWNHOUSES 2. Name of applicant: Karl Best 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: 10117- 159th Av S.E. Snohomish, WA 98290 Ph: (206) 349-9430 Contact Person: PERCO Engineering 1143 SR 532 Camano Island,WA 98292 Ph: 360-629-6710 4. Date checklist prepared: March 27, 1997 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Public Works Dept. 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable): Complete building construction by end of summer of 1997 or as soon as possible. Clear for private access road and home sites and install spreader trenches for drainage late spring. Complete parking area pavement by midsummer. Phase any remaining construction as weather permits. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. Coordinate with city to connect sewer and water lines for service to lots to existing stubs. Shedule utility connections. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Unknown. � ��m �1 2:g97 � �I • 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. None known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known. City Engineering review, Building permits, Sewer&Water connection. 11. Give brief,complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) TWO lots to be used for four duplex'es, associated parking area,and shared access to Puget Drive. Combined lot dimension is 155'x 150' 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project,including a street address,if any,and section,township and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map,and topographic map,if reasonably available. Site is near 159xx Puget Drive between Grant Ave and Rolling Hills Ave. just southeast of the Highway 405 and Benson Road crossing. This is in Section 20 Township 23 Range 5 East. Legal Description is : Tax Lot 147& 148, Lot 2 and 3 of Renton SP#275-79,Rec #7907209017 SC Plat DAT-PORSW. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site(indicate one): Flat,rolling, hilly, steep-slopes; mountainnus3 other b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? 45% c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat, muck)?If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. Silty Sandy Loam. Alderwood Series. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,describe. None known. ' 2 e. Describe the purpose,type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Install imported gravel base for private access road per county standards. Quantities may vary from 50-150 C.Y. depending upon soils subgrade condition. 1/2 of fill and grading material for parking to excavated from crawl space areas of proposed duplex's. This will be approximately 250 CY of cut and 450 CY of fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. Minimal erosion expected due to predominantly flat topography, construction during late spring early summer. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example,asphalt or buildings)? 40% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any: Construction to occur late spring an early summer. Use of tracked machinery for clearing and gradinng. Filter fence as required. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,dust,automobile odors,industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Typical exhaust and dust from equipment associated with construction of a single family residence. Minimal wood&brush burning during clearing process. . b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,generally describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: Comply with standard city brush burning permits. Use of standard construction equipment. 3. Water a. Surface 1y Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including, year-round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. No 3 2) Will the project require any work over, in,or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described waters? if yes, please describe and attach available plans. N.A 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,purpose and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial,containing the following chemicals...,agricultural: etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served (if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff(including storm water): • 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal,if any (include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water low into other waters? If so,describe. Runoff from the proposed parking area will be collected into a yard drain with a sediment trap and oil/water separator before infiltration and dispersal through a spreader trench and grass 4 lanape. Existing storm systems adjoining road frontage will converge with the remaining runoff. 100 year storm water increase should be negligible(less than 0.14 cfs). 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. Unlikely since storm system intercepts runoff. Runoff is not significant quantity and potential contaminant strength to be of much concern. In general runoff could contain small quantities of oil from parking area which will be removed with oilwater separator and grass filtration. No other wastes materials are anticipated. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground and runoff water impacts,if any: Splashblocks, infiltration of some runoff,vegetative landscaping, level spreaders, construction in relativelydry weather, and application of standard erosion control facilities including filter fence. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: • x_deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other x_evergreen tree:fir, cedar,pine, other x_shrubs _x_grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bullrush, skunk cabbage,other . water plants: water lily, eelgrass, mil foil,other other types of vegetation salmonberry, ladyfern b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Brush and blackberry clearing&cutting small alders and scattered small second growth evergreens. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None'MC/Wm. • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance • vegetation on the site, if any: Lawns,fruit trees,flowers, landscaping bushese. 5. Animals a. Idicate any birds and animals which has been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk heron, eagle_songbirds, other: 5 Mammals: deer,bear,elk,beaver, other: None Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. Not known d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: Landscaping typical for Duplex lots b. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric and or gas heat. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: Low energy appliances and high"R" insulation typical to new homes. Possibly energy efficient wood stove. 7. Environmental Health a. Arc there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. No . 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire department, Ambulance, and typical 911 service. • 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: Compliance with Building Code for construction periods and standard methods of construction. 6 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic,equipment,operation, aircraft,other)? Puget Drive and close freeway traffic, aircraft from Seatac. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis(for example: traffic,construction,operation,other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. There will be added vehicular traffic due to 4 duplexes and approximately 10 vehicular trips per day per residence or 80 to the local area. This includes additional garbage pickup and mail delivery. Hours of 7:00 -9:00 a.m. and 5:00 -7:00 p.m. typically account for the greatest acti'ity periods. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Landscaping typical for a residence and or duplexes. Additional noise insulation within house walls facing traffic. Location of homes as far as possible back from access ways without imfringment upon proposed landscape areas. Potential sound landscaping along Puget Drive. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Residential and Apartments. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? N/A e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Multifamily and residential. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? RMI (Residential Multifamily Infil) g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A 7 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so.specify. No. The locality however is mapped as a potential coal mine hazaard area within the Cities • Critiacl Area inventory. Subsequently Icicle Creek Engineering has inspected the area 3/97 and determined the site is not hazaardous. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 8 units @ 2 to 2.5 persons each= 16 -20 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any: SEPA. Site Plan, Engineering plan review, Inspections to be done by City and Building Inspectors. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. 4 middle to high income Duplex'es. b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: Comply with applicable city codes. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building materials) proposed? 28'with wood siding. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None 8 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: Set houses back from road as far as possible while still maintaining adequate parking. Enhance visual attractiveness with landscaping including backyard areas. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Glare due to windows only at late afternoon. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. not likely. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Slight traffic light from Puget Drive. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: Landscaping, setback of residence,and face duplexe windows toward one another and away from the Puget Dr. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Horse trails, parks,fishing,boating, swimming, aircraft golf. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: None. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Arc there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for,national,state or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe No 9 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. Puget Drive. Access will be taken at that frontage. b. Ls site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. Local Transit within 100'of site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 8- 10 None eliminated d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). Access driveway cut per city standard drawings. e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail or air transportation? If so,generally describe. SeaTac within 5 miles. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known,indicate when peak volumes would occur. 10 per residence with 4 duplexes assumed for a total of 80. 7:00-8:00 a.m. and 5:00-7:00 p.m. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: School bus service, flexible work hours,Transit service. 10 • 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. Standard increase of services would result including police protection, school bus service,mail, and garbage service. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. None proposed. • 16. Utilities a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity,natural gas,water, refuse service. telephone,sanitary sewer,septic system, other. (utilities are in the existing frontage and may need to be connected.extended to inside areas of the lot. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electric Power by Puget Sound Power and Light may require transformer vaults and line extension, Gas by Cascade Natural Gas would need to extend service stubs, GTE telephone- vaults are within right-of-way. C. ,SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: /l/'2/9 7 11 I E Icicle Creek Engineers, Inc. Geotechnical, Geologic and Environmental Services March 6, 1997 APR i' 997 Karl and Trica Best 10117 - 159th Avenue SE 'JEVELOPMENTPL VidifvU Snohomish, Washington 98290 CITY OF RENTON Geotechnical Consultation Coal Mine Hazard Assessment Lots 2 and 3, City of Renton SP#275-79 Rolling Hills Area Renton,Washington File No. 0136-001 INTRODUCTION This letter summarizes our geotechnical consultation regarding our coal mine hazard assessment of a property located east of 1506 Puget Drive Southeast in Renton, Washington. The property is identified as "Lots 2 and 3" on a plat map labeled "City of Renton SP#275-79, AF#7907209017. Our services have been completed in general accordance with our Services Agreement dated February 25, 1997 and were authorized by you on February 26, 1997. The property is situated in southeast Renton(Rollings Hills area)in an area where underground coal mining has occurred. The property is shown relative to nearby physical features on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. We understand that the city of Renton has requested a coal mine hazards assessment before development can occur on the property. SCOPE The purpose of our services was to provide a preliminary evaluation of coal mine hazards that may be a factor regarding property development. Specifically, our scope of services included: 1. Review of available mine records from the city of Renton, Washington State Department of Natural Resources and our in-house technical library to evaluate the location of the mined out areas, together with the depth of mining, thickness of zone mined and mining methods. This information was reviewed in concert with ground surface topography at the property to evaluate if there has been any surface expression or collapse of underground openings. 2. Surface reconnaissance mapping to identify mine openings such as adits or air shafts, together with stockpiles of mine rock or other areas in which the original ground surface has been altered. In addition, we noted surface topographic anomalies that might indicate collapse of underground workings. 3. Provide our opinion as to the risk of future property damage caused by collapse of underground mine workings. Icicle Creek Engineers,Inc., Meadow Creek Professional Center, 22525 SE 64th Place, Suite 202, Issaquah, Washington 98027 Telephone: (206)557-4368 Fax: (206)557-4369 Karl and Tricia Best March 6, 1997 Page 2 SITE DESCRIPTION GENERAL Our surface reconnaissance of the property was completed on March 2, 1997. The property is less than one acre in size and is vacant. The ground surface slopes less than 5 degrees downward to the northwest and is vegetated with brush and small trees. We did not observe any topographic depressions on the property other than a depression caused by the pulled root wad of a fallen tree. We did not observe any waste coal fill on the property. The property is surrounded by residential and multi-family development including Rolling Hills Condominiums to the north and Rolling Hills Village No. 2 to the east. The property is bordered on the south by Puget Drive Southeast. We did not observe surface water on the property at the time of our reconnaissance. SITE GEOLOGY Surficial soils at the site have been mapped by the U.S. Geological Survey(Mullineaux,Map GQ- 405,dated 1965)as glacial till that overlies bedrock of the Renton formation. The till generally consists of medium dense to dense silty sand,gravel,cobbles and boulders. The till may range from a few feet to 30 feet or more thick. The Renton formation consists of non-marine bedded sandstone and shale with coal seams. The Renton formation bedding dips at roughly 10 degrees downward to the east beneath the site. COAL MINE DESCRIPTION Similar to many areas in the Renton and South King County vicinity,underground mining activity occurred below the property in the early 1900s. We reviewed the following document as part of our assessment of coal mines in the property area: • Morrison/Knudsen,January 1985,Engineering Investigation for the Renton area, prepared for the U.S. Department of Interior Office of Surface Mining. The Renton/Talbot Mine.underlies the subject property. The referenced Morrison/Knudsen report presents a chronological history of the mining activities in the Renton/Talbot Mine. These activities are summarized as follows: Year Activity 1874 Opened by the Renton Coal Company 1886 Closed 1895 Reopened by the Renton Cooperative Company 1901 Bought out by the Seattle Electric Company 1920 Closed 1922 Reopened by the Strain Coal Company 1933 Closed The primary workings of the Renton/Talbot Mine consisted of the No. 3 seam. The No. 3 seam is documented to be about 11-1/2 feet thick, dipping toward the east at about 7 to 10 degrees. Typically, coal was removed using"room-and-pillar"mining methods where coal "pillars"were left in place for support of the"rooms"where the coal was removed. A map of the mined out area with an overlay of the property area is shown as the Underground Mine Map,Figure 2. The mine records indicate approximately 550 to 600 feet of overburden rock and soil above the mined out area. The relative thickness of overburden above the mine workings across the site is shown as the Overburden Thickness Map,Figure 3. Icicle Creek Engineers 0136001/030697 Karl and Tricia Best March 6, 1997 Page 3 The geologic map of the property area indicates a relatively thin veneer of glacial drift soils overlying the bedrock in this area. We estimate that the depth of glacial drift soils is probably less than 100 feet across the property. Based on our review of the Morrison/Knudsen report, mining related surface features (mine spoils and a surface depression) occur about Y2 mile west-northwest of the property. We did not observe any evidence of unusual topography on the property that may indicate collapse of underground workings, coal spoils or piles, portals or air shafts. COAL MINE HAZARD DESCRIPTION The principal physical hazards associated with abandoned coal mines include (1) sinkholes and related gas emissions or concentrations, (2) regional subsidence, and (3) mine spoils. Sinkholes form shallow depressions in the ground surface, or in extreme cases, a vertically sided pit caused by collapse of poorly backfilled mine openings or progressive failure of the mine roof(stoping). Regional subsidence occurs as regional plastic deformation of the ground surface as the mine collapses. Mine spoils are stockpiles of mining by-product consisting of broken rock and coal. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL In our opinion,the mine workings that underlie the Best property are relatively deep and are a low risk for sinkhole development potential. There is an inherently higher risk of potential damage to a structure built on the subject property as compared with a similar home built in an area with no underground mines. This is because of the possibility of undocumented underground workings and prospects, and the unknown nature by which regional subsidence is manifested in this area. The area mine workings have been abandoned for several decades, and consequently, a substantial amount of the collapse in the workings should have already occurred. SINKHOLE HAZARDS Based on our review of available information,the Renton/Talbot Mine exists approximately 550 to 600 feet below the ground surface at the subject property. Currently, the generally accepted depth or thickness of overburden for "safe" surface development over underground mines in this area is 200 feet. A surface expression of mine collapse(such as a sinkhole) is unprecedented for a mine with this thickness of overburden in all case histories and technical reference papers that we reviewed. In Washington state, we are currently investigating more than 800 sinkholes including the documented sinkholes in the Renton area. Based on our preliminary findings, approximately two-thirds of these sinkholes have formed over poorly backfilled mine openings. The remaining one-third, with exception of three, have occurred where the workings are less than 100 feet deep. The three exceptions have occurred where the workings are less than 150 feet deep in an area of unique overburden conditions not comparable to the subject property in this report. REGIONAL SUBSIDENCE HAZARDS It is our opinion that the entire Rolling Hills area is at a moderate risk regarding future regional subsidence of the ground surface caused by long-term collapse of all the abandoned underground mine workings. We are not aware of any reports of damage to structures in the Rolling Hills area because of regional subsidence. The damage to a structure in the general Rolling Hills area caused by regional subsidence is expected to be manifested by jammed doorways or windows,or cracks in drywall or masonry finishing. The structural damage could be similar to that expected for most new, wood-framed construction because of ground Icicle Creek Engineers 0136001/030697 i Karl and Tricia Best March 6, 1997 Page 4 adjustments to the home foundation loads. We do not characterize this type of damage as threatening to the overall structure integrity. MINE SPOILS Based on our site reconnaissance,no mine spoils exist on the property. USE OF THIS REPORT We have prepared this report for Karl and Tricia Best for use in evaluating coal mine hazards at the property subject to this consultation. Our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of subsurface conditions at the site. Within the limitations of scope,schedule and budget,our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time the report was prepared. No other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. ******************** We trust that this report provides the information you need at this time. If you have any questions or need additional information .le. . tact us. .. ,o AsIil tiw ' 4k' F c, 7', Yours very truly, '' Icicle Creek Engineers, Inc. kv r)i"^ i^ 4010 � A,.422 2'P--.M.''')." . IP 0 +.GISTOV ti't�, --1CNAL ECG Brian R.Beaman,P.E.,P.G. Principal Engineer/Geologist LEXPIRES (o.3o.q S 1 Document ID:0136001.LET Three copies submitted Icicle Creek Engineers 0136001/030697 • tIto e' •.�\ .at l- i. 117 1 '`' Wit—r-- r' ~ \ If __;Pe,.., i i `tom _Y4- 1V c Vj •cISIN•11101+ \ .:3'$""" . `: ti.. 'I . �. . :.- =. :::�-:�.`' • ,,> �J \ j„_ L- Map]-wood-- ` re _ I ILJ _`�, -�-�-�, -r• .,-rr • 1,:,._ ._. • �,�/ He;gh sj. t ;'1 'yam• Tg -i '*" '1° <o, It! i=r= �� r;rr.• ---r=!^/ _.. ti ✓l 4 f. _ ..; 1 - Best Property' t,_--- Y ,.� • ;ti \ ter i.= !fr.- I trt),•\` .� -- %;. '.°-:_ -:z,:p , /� _':, -=I� •t i .'li •d i ^ I �167 , J� ` =.7 ^�� i � � •\,p �` - ,, I `� 1 I r i r __ / : `�- � � 2t, `t. \ _- / _ 1. Paa _r 1i/I r��;' 35 31 i';r.P a - _-,`�i f? \\ 1 ,w� f06 ' r ." may: _ ' ' - t ,` I`�--r i �� , p . , w I. \ r .� Jt2 r`iPc�rh, • \I�y� i' G \ ... _ —�t.F it_.Jhijiteremer`•tlfi-i-�fffIt�7���.7_ _ t �'; 3 e ve � �` acB tI ��L +' ` Prt yi �- (,,..,,,,,,./ l I%�`/Sewaoei'�i{ I I lkilik ' `� J v� , '� • - • . , 1, ,:s Er\ ._ i'als:C. J '',,,1\ s\N. 'k's\\,,s...)Nii:\..1/ i[� M1a ,\ i E1 ,o .a�� 1 t \ _ 114�ad •I H.. -- __ iP:r ``i�- l•wts OVAL - 515 _ C:rk- \`-• ••h1 9 J 1R71er• ?= - a 11�,, i 5.16d -4 :al=y1 •4.`' L ke�,1, .` ;1 plc r �7a �, 1• - nnii, 1 - - I.�� .Filii-.6.6,-L7-"411 R �,�A rf I_ r1 °ste,Or ` t. l\r \ l•. I 're Ta� : 1 I A-114 L7 ' All f� \ i6� q ar� + �' fliC3I. .St_ .ke J " _. .-. `\/ik6 11, %t�\ -is \_^l^ T. 1 JI `! t% i0 Base map: U.S.Geological Survey "Tacoma,Washington", 1991,scale 1:100,000 A 0 8,000 16,000 Approximate Scale: 1 inch= 8,000 feet North Icicle Creek Engineers Vicinity Map - Figure 1 . ,. , c„.., 1 .s,,.. rn It7. i. .... .. .... .„,_4.4, 4.,-• ,,,...4 • - . ,to ',.• ..4,,,,, .•,-,,,r • , ' I. *4- , 2. /.-,,, 4.,_4,,;.„,.•. ,::kvi:Ikt),..:,,.,,,:„„,,,a,„0p, A, ,, tli.lit:c4:-i I .,... ..—.4-,----; • . e4 . - - . ..-- v-p..., ,i . _444,,-.4..• ik..,„,,-.,v., ...... mIi% "'` • •l�.`- JT t'. R ,`a� ,� y ` E csCfi` •)� •f - "f3 , [r '';1vf, � lYi1'`�:f➢`s.,',.,v, 11 �7�1,�� gt,t k.S'1 .�r': �j{r }dr Y:?1N. .�• i t ig; - 'x i aAS"S% Ys"L ''c::" $f—IvAlt':;':*o.„* g s.44.d... ,,•, :lk 114.( ` . •i t_.. .. f°:F ` 7 t 'S N'ya a i'y T r i' 's,,�` �v 'tt '1,7 "'r y+C . ry; � • 'r"x• e+"F.. r-- I - s�.._..Q��3• saA ya+' y,,j��iTytre e-01�.+44, 1 .'f•-%A.. •�+'4 i L• s t -+,�r,s f1 � da.� 'i�, `'�$ f b �4„ t v• tt, si. .3 tY ",`` �v„,qt...�ii: ',,,.T,n. T' -, t ".i AN k:i,�; j a r ,. ,a ; r h,,r .w!. ,'+,� ,r a `.t&n ... r r�'x•`e.;,'r14ti,•"`y`.-44• n. i'Y i n<,a'2*:ling;. 11, 11=r1`� i, �+ ;h2, {.!�. Lr i ,1•.Y � hc3 ,,A'�y.a"pi,-, s i ,-r kf``#,,4 Y.".ir,r,• .1 ' '. 'ti t L- "ti. 'a.}�. , '�.. "� p..a.-,. ITv. .. y,F„� i�, .r�.vh�T ��x� ��t',��,px t s. r�'r. b�+r'�S'Gp;,rzr xTy �3a���`� Via` —.N, 1, y. 'i+r t }. iet1,1.s :m.;�h--`�.}t�„t.;,4I4:tr,.'iv4 y»xc `�Y 4 3'F s�e ,,,..N N`ssx ,; ! zS�". i y :�' 3 ,� 'i r• 'A . v y �r t ,.k r,�r.'"C' a, k fey •�yj s . 1 rvi4- •A 'i3. a k:� f� Tq-0,7_,-.„,‘„.., a,� t s� , SY i.. L z, r.r x; �". ^{' '7 ;:. 4 1,le 74 . t ., ` s 4 si• ::;....,' ..r ':D y'F' . : �y' . a +'•,,i 3„,..„ 5A� ,-e . S.> ����,,, - F `543.•,,x`<.-qv ° N'1 , ii.b 'n E s��]{ Y Z `'Li vt 5i of a r. �t > +.� k t t � 4q�5 i s-E.,�i Wit- sr ' lc. •x ;y 1 y "�• '�.w f`: �k� a'�, .,j( U f ..,�''""".#. .'T' ��„',, '�r�`t.. G` :;.` , ?w c. ate` t.i'{ 0,40-.',----r•:' �4 •-i:�. 'ir , r, rat 54ini, • ' t ,. r:xsn,. .*,r.„n..F,4.y "' Ltr1j4j •' s 4 �.{'.•,, ya f ; ! t x`` 't• SA-, • �lS -` ZZA-i s4itt' 'ilv ',AA1 4:-;' "` " r 7t*.,i%j i .77V-4.+t_,� • :a ..... - �sr?/' . zi-' tom' , �En .{il 4: t ..„,„ .,,,< '�" , ,,,a. ', z'.',- r., 'qa . ,„ F� {ti.‘'-' '€"t a � S `, k "'t ' '.a " ft` : ? A, {7-t aro. kr -}vtv.i 3�t t : n e r- 14 y ?�''' -zi, "'sS j �'t,�, 3't+. `a.,vr�,� �atfC ���i �R}.yYf,nr ,i��' '. ai• � �r +Shu'" �n" .tA� r-- •'..^Y r, ,ME+. r t-:y� �: ^ ,54 •"�✓''r nt y, �rl4M vY 1> NZ7�t<' �?�grrir -0sligi ,13+ 1.. •F 4 '''f.: � � .' . s,• t„'a-':y .1 t gytin 'S, fit!✓c�xs :•4Pa .,Y?t.;r r: 7t,VS,.,vf_ p a, .s yia. ,t.. :IQrJiq .'. ' ,j� f...... rya,i» sa. '�, . ! ,1~r. F ` `,4 .x'x a . •:.+'`� •_ x , .a.+. )2 y", �T it c..' ,r ..hr yam; : +r ...,91r `". ♦ Y t.,- t `. i' -r. t<t �•'•- _ r t L,q ft3,t,.•' "A i 7f yttAfr, `'-7` i'$1 C'tc ti f'r" ( 1 :!�C+ idr a' ii^ s'"+��".. .& iiiS+;Az'� ! a t, ice.: r at 3".3Y t� ;'Jvilt r ,+itt�'!. ,:,4-'�A� ,�• ?P. a �1 € r "�:•i; afi fi '�F+;�'1r fir' R s t' ni '''" to t. .. %. r a k;, ,�' ,tt ,,A.A. I.�t;�rr� w - r�,,; /�. � si .�•y.,t.; ti � ,Y.'.r `L ry ,'�it�yt �.iA.. (�1.�`,�, •t��}{t t,; 55 k ti :- d �.,gw`i rs 5j.f ,,,...g" -) r i►f*._r .: a i +y,Px �.VI- �raam ;Ct vt l y », s z � �'3''z �•�tv�ik� � t�.'Sy,�-. x7c ��3 r/ ,,, r��..•-t '. .g ( y �''(f• �� ,r.� a�xF�"'4Y..r_�.f�'' � , ,,'T : � . $r^tt '" .,r _ a�- ask,.^ -1-, 9r L t ,tyrh �a`1.;r4.6.e'.,s r.. 1� � "b t•ty,t''{rfi ( "clY�J �1 ep 2 3 A•1' `�; - ...-l' If.. .,f, ! r,7�+k 4"` "`ss.5 i. a�. t t�,l:*- n*"F, s,11 + ^• l 1 "' ^ '.. , 0:-_-,- '"Y`• " ai. �.-:. ,•i.0 t qk !r": ,-4., .;,raa`:::,,.,�.,'...,.. ,b ".,vt '`,a,-.1. ��s", y, , •-• t 'b lit • i • szs � r� rye.-� Stiff l� f J'�. 1 ;rC ��F . yt } 7y j j +.-.t 'F,a�; i';ts. ..��,z,,�. ‘...1 ri.r, `., r • V }...-•.. tr I5r?! rt.,4, °t#•,,'Sk'"'vr.,y:. T {Si-` f t f ^^z i'Ya'`,�• i t+,.`- « j «{ ax^,.. ' e �ir,�sP.�r Se'. f{,A,,i,�\f -S ^`t, � '\ ,.r. tax, I}fC `. • . s -t ...k ; VP+• t I 1.: �.'7- • rt.:,� t' ,,, �. 1 r h x. ti r}.F' "� N11�5 P s/ t r� .. ... N„ ,,,,r ,, - ;l t' ..,.t ��s n • SRUm• S� ... .. .: ,. 'i >'4... : r •,'s t` y'yn1-,* �a.' ' 4t .,T - V-. `t.'"t- 'a'^tcr''' I°.b'' ^ • / '^ t, 9�, p�1 f '}F-•� fi�'j. 4 S i4 '�, ,./1 '/'.. - s� ' fir `t"U' r.,,,„.3. ''"? y- r .4 m, f-, t Ys. C �f "' F :s ,� h "'r / get ,:+ a .er.,," r rFz •'Best Property r ' ,4 • ,;Y .� ; , :r' ' 1 r/ Doi rj l !, sis :,, 7tr x• k �`�3> .; " s_ � r +r � �,,.. { 1 lY t t i ,G h .ar ,44i,..44 y� ' . to ,,.,.' I� • .s •., ; , • t .yy., ,:s. w .5� lt'.. t .jC ,�.y y J'i• ft.:` ,,r. V �y £s (a j 1 : .L 1 {� t .ya"4 t -•--:.' ,,, y `3F4"`2.' ',i, Yfi,..4 kT' 15.; T" -, . • . JI- I� `fan, `� �II,'�.� �' �'.."4 M. ,✓Z I� �:'� 'i • • �a rr y�`{" Ir•1. y '�',''S7W L', a` P . ' 'zr '+ !'. � r ... J.fi t,. 4. '-3f',,, i �'r + t } 1 ! } „'.,. i, , '�Tw4 ' P6° ! } 1 fit �j," t ,jr-„pi, r, ,.^ 4r , > r g � 'C�� tµ a,t v. �t#it .0 t f ._.': } :� M - y j' • l' ,! a s 4 r �' tilt J { �I1 et nn 'f 1.• t � x • .a. R - rs'xr'F t�,.• ,,-p".rsr3 3.o�- •l0 %Siir 4�4���1�1�, ' i 4 i F'2.tri,n•" y ' s ,����??E''''' .c✓. r .r- '•(x xA> 5'i,v F f�.C.t`5 7 7 '. ' , 'It: yL 1.,. ' R"qz 4' i'''" 1 y 1' A s ay,,rK, b ! ` f .1 ton w t ! - al... .„0,_ „44..... .., .. .,., , . ,•t {A .,2,.t 5 �a. }"yv sh' fir,#41- '•^a� t Fr rd"F �'t,�..•-C t; • f ,-.• .x,,rJ' { . •v' t�T C _ 'S 2'Ji}1 "T SJ 'Y rC ,t i 4 .. ` .� . .. 2 .,F.. i 4tt •7 x4i ,`� ..•=r s. r i '` �11 „: .__,,,,:. _ ._., F,. N " 1u 1. ,� 4 .frr '4' .y,k. •,� r .. j, k, •_ .. .... t!l4...e :; -.�^ 't 2, RA r t'.• s 1 k ' !s,\ 4t T r.•w i`;���•.h :.y..r..�l ,x , a >. r9 .....x' r ' ,,., rik,\r.•r1� •ei+"rr•�'+... '.7=E w .. The Underground Coal Mine Map shows the distribution of underground mine tunnels of the Renton/Talbot Mine in the vicinity of the Best property area(Reference: Moririson/Knudsen, 1985) A 0 500 1,000 Approximate Scale: 1 inch=500 feet North Icicle Creek Engineers ; Underground Coal Mine Map - Figure 2 r. '�9 }�,t''((p�+ s i�' 1'1 ' :';d am ' � `jam :r y`• �,_ -.If •.. i`�'y+" r 't{ "rla!ryr'41, ..�1""o-..`kivktr h.>`-� ;5,.�.,e .Ar-..'s.i `Ne#�, ?t 't4 h s=' ,,,..~,:.,..,1-- L.f Y .•Yj'• �+� "w, .) G ` r} t' 4 ? t-r' ;.'�''> 'i tyr�'�?. ."�` '''''. `' .}'-volt' r'1,• ` v "' .,,J!g. ".' r•-c a f,"dC . r'� t�'��;f j ' .f 1. . 4? �q .4 r - w. '�.° .r ,,, , {V, c k< F#�e' �•'1 .v• �:, t g � • TJ r '$�a�- '' �£ F .. a� c �. ..-,�4 i- A^ i' ,. , h t }ia rn ,1,4 ::-3 ,7 '�`, :rt. ♦, x'.. •'> t. t ��kn t �. b i�" r ' ' •V V •'S 1X1" ii,, !' k'',�ff� .. 'y, �'fN�3�y" }i t Y.+G 1�"y '� ��`t f.. r,.• �+Y' '' u,1 4, "•' 1 ., , .• +.. �X .Yt $ j& kr jX '.�• ,. k"SY • o.G � r i i!•Y '}�i F I( ,LvR '4'V' 7 S•` . r'-k-f- .• . ki`':, � t 'p,� ' � ►, +�• . ?4 , � '&«+ ? ,� 3, r H x o x n 4�, r +''• r� ,y w is m r .+- .r w t. ��r �_� j',•• �Tr � o -N,r 'r 'r4`'w"a+.�=d r*J�:r��,��s1�j:' '�4w�a�++�3�St`, a��..�!�"�"�(�•+ , „..,4, '^c gam. 'A t ' A- k.. s+pr, S `v ;o.'i + C•+ a t .:-•w '* *s..,t vt, :Xw.. i • tr ,� -•y'�..•i d��' }+ �rtr_' '� kv�y � ti„ i t_ r -' t s ' s `t�r t ,�'`,,.'` i.: :,pit... Y ;!f',hr rR c �4.. ? :� , a lta 1,''r' .y4, ‹>4 '"t1 -k �d ;cM F ^"''' Y '.t• 5 4r . - }k'.T `r `+ .t� Y ' ,, i t 'R� t,,.Y-„At ,..,,. ,, '}v7,a_. *r5 r`...r ,4 fx ,c. �3 i..I.`'' '^ : _a.- .*a� r y -• '. -,r, u ' ", r }' ' X ,w. 'r£x .- - 'd.t ids f,?�...,- �>'�' ''µ bk 1, of ' a4,t�. x. s q. "y'�,`� (� jyp, gyp. -ypf . �. .4]rs _ ,d,ls. . vS @) •/}t -'�r A,r, F.,i vtju: � ` (... _lvfft, .,y "t .� 1 i y i r 1. ,1 'I 'f " Y..3 ' �..l e'+ t` Y- . '' Y ',701 � � r`< .. ?t. �.`" v ii�' ' S'✓ '�x'r �"'`+`+F 4 7 i �: ' -x.•ki ar ••�`+ i.' t E ` rt s,,a 'S" a•r y�"`AP ,,fit N" y a F, 1e• °+c.4'4; A rt , t x L Irt5.1 Y !. 1 y . p i",k > �`4,4iz r � � Ftp,•,aiFwcat� .,t, rs �'1�ti a�i�',`��tr t .,� �`��!f„„' ��, +tY .uy,M;j'� �"�}�`•�ry 5•L�'0,•. XS ��,. .•�0 ��'�.�r }•"ti• + 'L" ; .. ^.a 1 "f4--, Vz. t;V t�.'. b '7.J•yt'xdhS :i., Y psi 4- a k^F 'y',.i.. s .��r x.•S`W'4 '."4 A ,t �` ='a.Q� • to r^+-4y }, p , * s k t ;>c a 4� + e Y"x "Yx •f +yhi 4''_� �" Jsr, ,t 'L . rf l " ,' r.yJ` Y r +''`; ;� �y.�•�✓ r �• r�- St R +} ,� e k�r��, -y'�.Y• '�'Y,,,,�,,, ,�,•.ev �y'q' � ; :sr .t K" t �`r*^� , t . t�f n'r 41 9 Y y ,„• C i• StrA 2 .. xi-;,Al. a. ,,,`la(.a t.�$ t '.�• tt 4�t+ t � ,�s '' £�.'kiir< ..� 't�i°' �� >• k,>t Y�„n'�t..k' e.L r. ti � �� +'�' ��=, t i _tii, r-:,,', '€ ,, ..itr,i�vI+e+t�.,cr,. . + k+',,+-- s Zm4'�,4yn, �{t Sties r, : �1� _ trc z',`c l'-: _ __ r y�.r ir .' W- sC'sn, 7 ttp, %it$4,'a rr�a ,��a;Y• ad i',zr y�,,..� ; S�` ,y •'�y •� ez.' {�+'�y�rSf�i ., � � E� `a� --�+ �j L�e � ,e',?t, y�-iF�y '' '�';iI.* a'�a �'a '�' -•,t;.. y3.lII"` sF '' r tL. �� r. i •,^t•+, Y. -p y,, 'c 3� s� "Li•k' J?,i✓ Ms s,5C', 4 Yo+ Y`I- `''i •tJ a .I-.ro�,, c,'?�'*f'YS3.I"v rr t w -i-'Ix Y Y -E'�. • ".rx, . ,, r* �,r} r ti• i+ L r r wit „,btu 0' • ' ,S'ct `'" '9v '3r r�F ,, r r'L{ry{� x. h �_ a ict N ' ' , S•. > A16. Cal .lr v> j 1'55, 7 .,%c - 4=4 ' r .5 ' ,7 •+ F�.�p�� } �k. > N '�s r .' ..>�r+>,t ,LysS. r, s s (.:.• L. ':>, C,,2 s T�{ �r'' `U' iA r 4,-.. '.: 1 r , ,...v •. f ' k` nr``t ar y+ es'' £ }� i px''_` , � 4 f'a; ~r �_ a i • . SY7 v",f.1t y t is •s v>` -. "�r ..t i� � kr '1�! } ;�.v! F" .tt. =;'. a't44, ., p. r a i.VZ' H i'lt5 ,t. :".>s }A�3"4:, Y r r§1 ..- Yg, •,. u._ .. 'r... " � r o r _- ,4 •',ri; 'T s die 541`+",,j4-.^ f•4 2 'r$�' ,�'r • y J. �„ \ --.4 ''.-.: 4 E i �� n pve,SE �•> . f r•IS ` ' y, a �:� .a` li•,, Y,.'WL„, hS: , 4,, RokIling i•,: Ta r t• �'� ti� x h to �. t}t••* L" a L • ;I F. a i !.. �5 _z'-J s -4 `` , ro, �'z L,i,:. r.:.;'t tn,l ;., t�tc ,y t 7.,` to �„st'�' 'y`'y_,ps i 5' -. '. may, > g t -j ,c`},,„ 1 i. k r4k rp . 1 ,Y"• ,,, ,': ' j S; r i f` 2 g �' L OS-4 ",, F,_.. '�,--,-�•^^•'44 t r+�'" ",: �r :=!!:r r:a f`.r, ,get��� }` "is+�e�`i-' `•�•Best Property x �k' u ' tx :tti. M Y 1• -'� Y r}T".`. `'r4 `/� .. ". _ -$L `a" k k Y.. • r' :4)4' , --:- } r i'?7'r i,l a •r s''g +t4.. S� !4 r 1 r s° 1<. sr '{i A„..„. y + .,Q, x3tn t. t- -i --it "-'<,it �"'g------. '."' •hP ;t t 4 :a, r ' �,'• 44 'j ,�x 7f�k'�v V f r3Ri^�} ,-".t,�-•rr'j'r.a a r r' I t, l irk .x•••e.. -(`'F:J-,„sth}•` ..�y,,,,, t. •ram -�..vp Yc 4" li-�y , , fi'r } /.k • l Y /. r er �, W- S"�•,.Ar iG.. ,,y,• F"J.2y V• ^�1 ', Sir t rj .d 3 s o-J s; Y•S' ,'.. :t 7 • y'�t„s o. . tar �4 a .r �" . . 4 i"'J two Y.44 3 .fi t'�- . A v,n. ti .2•y`I•r •• r '. 4 .-y, (� ,+ • 4 ro x t ..fit 1,Z ,t� s' �" •• .• i %tr • t +. , ,., , : 'l ' ,-,:C j N}fc.ra ,x,,, ti co, =t. ,t M k �. •t. �' , . .,, '�•,A c' 't„ k,. t�`j`:• C•t' i7: - �,, fr 3'7'4'{ t,,qq� F 4 r +. }; O t r #"� 1. i. ,'i'�¢rSt, '�Q K -+� yi r `� { . p j s fw ' , r : ,' Y x +a ', 7 tr ,ah J 7y 5pi.'t4 -, 1 .J �- .sub i•-4-7t� � y o.HP"`=. E `e r• -, 1:.;,= ,,'�-.__ .-c' 'FA;;,...„ .;,;,,,,......,' � ":. is r x ,••q< t: "•. a't r f ' .. • s 5 r •r r 1C" "•k ' 4i fi•y.i. i,..,F • ��, ji`! �+-It Y: 'S`.'�w.::i. r ""..�`"' «, . 3> r. t, i rt • ti at ;s tt°S�y+�� J r • '- '+tire'+�`ry7HR4� . { > ^; r�'h fi a.� ,. �r,7 a6.o� x•L ., ,l..r'3' _,•t3 r, sr, �Z a�te' �.. s.'y ='n•-. .'" °' Lt.,._ 33 l r t x{ «`_S`c ';`w +r' `A. 'c�s: s '�.a d+,� ..,..y.': The Overburden Thickness Map shows the estimated depth(in feet)from the ground surface of the Renton/Talbot Mine in the vicinity of the Best property area(Reference: Morrison/Knudsen, 1985) A 0 500 1,000 Approximate Scale: 1 inch=500 feet North Icicle Creek Engineers Overburden Thickness Map - Figure 3 S. R. Jay Consulting Biologist 1908 Liberty Lane . Marysville,WA 98270 (360)659-8159 FAX(360)651-7252 Shelly Rae Jay,Owner Date: February 27, 1997 To: Mr. Best Best Construction 10117 - 159th Avenue SE Snohomish, WA 98290 From: Shelly Rae Jay S.R. Jay Consulting Biologist 1908 Liberty Lane Marysville, WA 98270 Regarding: Wetland Determination on Lots east of 1506 Puget Drive in Renton, WA. S.R. Jay Consulting Biologist, was hired to determine the presence of wetlands and streams on two lots located east of 1506 Puget drive. Site visit commenced on February 27, weather conditions at that time were over case/rain. This area consists of sparse trees with a dense under canopy. The upper canopy is made-up primarily of Red alder with mixed Big leaf maple. Two-thirds of the shrub layer is dominated by Himalayan blackberry. To the east there are Indian plum and a few Vine maple. Ivy is common along the west side. Mahonia and Salal make-up the majority of the herbaceous layer on the east side. Nootka rose and Snowberry along with a few small willow were found along Puget Drive. The soils on these lots showed no signs of past or present hydrology to 18 inches. No standing water or flowing water was observed. Drains pipes from the property to the east discharge on to the subject property, but does not seem to accumulate. The City of Renton requires that the all Environmentally Sensitive Areas be located. The Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987) was used to identify any wetlands. According to the methodology set forth in this manual no wetlands were found to be present on these two lots. No streams either seasonal or perennial were found on this property. The wildlife value of this disturbed urban site is low. The most common animal use is usually song birds, mice , rats, and opossums. EOSc1.711 k 6%1/6,4 J�NT p c9� O Pg. 2 Date: February 27, 1997 RESULTS Soil information 0-6" 10YR 2/2 gravelly sandy loam 6-20" 7.5YR 4/4 to 10YR 5/4 gravelly sandy loam this area has been burned in the past mixed charcoal and bright areas were found below 6 inches. soils were moist, no saturation was observed within 18" of the surface. Plant information Common Name Indicator Scientific Name Red alder Alnus rubra FAC Big leaf maple Acer macrophyllum FACU Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor FACU Indian plum Oemleria cerasiformis FACU Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FAC Snowberry Symphoricarpos albus NI Willow Salix spp. FACW Oregon grape Berberis nervosa NI Salal Gaultheria shallon FACU Ivy Hedera helix NI If there are any questions please contact Shelly Rae Jay at 360-659-8159. Respectfully Submitted, Shelly Rae Jay, Owner S.R. Jay Consulting Biologist y. STORM DRAINAGE REPORT for 2 PROPOSED DUPLEX LOTS "RENTON HEIGHTS TOWNHOUSES" Tax# Zo2-305— J' l47 09)VS Site: 159XX Puget Dr Renton, WA March 11, 1997 '' ' -` ._ �7lZJL,:7 �0 wAS 1.,ey. , PERCO q '�' i y.' ' Job #96039 ', ,' �rt` o ':''"l'o,p :1': 1"- ''74+s'GISTSSV , ' Q10NAL° COVEP ,, EXPIRES 6-20-Se) I APR 161997 Owner: OEV cow oFIRE PLANNING LNG Prepared by: Karl Best PERCO ENGINEERING 4801 Storm Lake Road 1143 SR 532 Snohomish, WA 98290 Camano Is. ,WA 98292 PH: (206) 334-9430 PH:(360) 629-6710 qVg 4t , PERCO ENGINEERING Dan Parrent Professional Engineer 1143 SR 532 Camano Island,WA 98292 Telephone(360)629-6710 March 13, 1997 PROJECT: Tax #: 202305-9147-09, Er D8 2 Duplex Lots 159xx Puget Drive Renton, WA 98--- DEVELOPER: Karl Best 4801 Storm Lake Road Snohomish, WA 98209 Ph: (206) 334-9430 DRAINAGE REPORT Er DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS Four Duplexes are proposed for an approximate 0.52 acre parcel located lmile east of downtown Renton ,adjacent to Puget Drive near Jones Place. The eastern 75' of both rectangular parcels front Puget Drive along the southerly boundary, where access will be taken for the proposed buildings. The property is approximately 1/4 east of Benson Highway 515 and 1 miles south of the 405 interchange. More generally this is in Section 20, Township 23, N., Range 5 E., of the Willamette Meridian, in Washington County, WA. . EXISTING CONDITIONS Less than 15% of the lot has scattered second growth trees and thick underbrush. The remaining area is thick grass and blackberries. Most of the combined lot area slopes gently toward the northwest at 5-10% while the eastern 10% is relatively steep along the property boundary. The frontage at Puget Drive is already improved with curb, sidewalks, and a planter strip. Utilities are in place within the frontage and will be connected to the proposed structures per city standards. Storm water presently traversesthe lot in the form of sheetflows from southeast to the west and northwest, and appear to infiltrate and or and disperse along the property boundary. Brindle Storm Drainage Report PERCO#96022 2/11/97 DRP Page l/24, . . . . • , • , . .. . . . . ...: . • . ' . , ;',.;-:,:•",, . . .. - . , . . • ' . . •, , • ' • .. --=Th-- -- • •••••,••••••—1,,,,r,,-.:-. _.. •• • ..„,.7.7,777, r.. -.:.,:y,li :f, o,,v,,,-.;t,,r-i-i'!...51....v....17,,...4);,:s.Nc '1:':•.--'7,••••';''''.•:•; _,L-'7;••:.I.Y::-.."•';',,1,-.;:.',),:,,'-.'-:•,:;'•2 I...2.•.•••1''',•••• ".'"-••••-•• ••-;..:. :•;•.'•;!' ••CI''•' .....:.Ii:T• • ''''V: 44;'..4...'. :: 4.,‘ I .I'. '-'44'S..4.:72 :•••'''..;?-;'‘:::•;,'1'. ,.1,,••;4, .•.:Ik4;r•w•.,1;:;:1•:',•,T•vi.:•'”.c1....:••.•.:1 .! •:...f2.,;•%1:'4.?' . E4E16,:i•iii,,..,,.,' ,,.., 1...,v...':- ..-..•!.,:;-.- 0.•-,. .-•.,..2. . ,.,:r -,Af: ,,,,h,?-_-L-,-.-.-7.±+7,.---- .. *-7'h....'3.1-. '. ir,,, .v,v.....,". •:...„..,,.:.•,:y Av. . , s,,, ..;.,• .•,-. •,,i• -.. ... •• ';-.. .._ •iii•.... PACIFIC x,.,SW ,,,i,...- I.e,,i,•tccii: 4,.,..4:..„," ...-...,,,,,,, ,...,..1......:?: ...:.„;•..,,:... ,...., .,..„...• :• •-.,,,.....-°-.-:. ....:....:'':'''''''''''• • 1....,•.„-1.,-,-,..---, ,.„, L.,'..•.::::::,,-:..-..,.---,,-, ,.. I.,-:,..D3,:_•.. , :.::.,:•,.,=..• ..;_., r„- ci-, yr• : EOWELL. AV SW 1”: .,'.2:•,••,k••i.•:.. ..!•4......t:. 474..,,.......... •:::.:;..-,,s_:•.: ...:74,.......,.., . ,•••..• •.,...,..,.N•i'...;=;•. ' 'TH9PAA -• b.4./. W .'T-tif.-0..m.As:'••v" • 11,1*.;44.:•^Y., LTO:." 5,'.',.. ---...:: , ''1. '.:1-',Fri ,:, .• .:...',:.i',..;2';,...".' -': :.1.. ,',.1:. ..,,;, '..::1 ' •' '0, ... .''''"• . .'''':' "- . 1R-4iE • ---• ',..,-,.. • ...,. 'a, ,,,.=' .- HAVMGN• `'••• f'. AV •'• ....- • , ••. • .L:,..-••••,'.--,:-,.•; :..-•-fl..,_._-....z'.—._.•_::—.-r'‘'1,.-.'=..— , •,.--•7:..-7-!.7.7i7".., l';.„:):::•,11.•lei::.::i.•(,:.'1,'''. ..':''''' r.•'•.'• -:'- -,'.'••-••, •:1-.1•:-,..•.;.-! .. .-.1,•:::•i..;':''''i';',-4-.::''.:•••-•:.-'''''''1"':‘'3'''':*1.1'''1•:•• ' .1.' .' ''''...,:i•!'1:•,;'•-•:?1'.;••-,•;;.' . v:••i;,17ii:::..:.„...,, :. ,..,•.•:`,.;::!...,'..., :0....,,:,L.,i'v.• ,:, *:,..1... :::0"+::::•:... ,:i•'.',.,,,,•.,:,::•:„.....,':',!,':'•,:'-'.''.:.•;:::•-,.\:' S.0:43. :••• '. SW . -I4!...:••‘;'i.:S.EilECAl. '..IT . W • I';'":"'''' ''''' --.1.'‘..!,7:::''':.•ti••:- ,.•."...-;"••:‘....•:.. .'..•.el.;•;-•=ri..'•':'- • 2:..J.. ":'V"k•Z.'•,''.'....•'/..'''-'.-...J...;' 1•..4T;.•k';•-• ....1. i.-,7.; i•ND •" 'SW...'"...,....',--T.: I='-`,.;•7:';,4'; -...'''..•;.. -•.',•,,0•.‘:'-'(n5 "...,:•.i..,'".' ''..:.I-,...:.----• %.-0,". ,..4:15 UT:;,--"-,`/'''.Cd)•"'....21 '''' ', !,-"' '12:1:-,!:...! "22- ',`"!...''',':;7'.-,-,•:,--: 7----,i,;'•-•.- '''<.-.',--:-.,:•'--s---- -• .•(... .,,:-.::;.:,,-;-:: -,•••'.:‘.--:-.1',.,'-i'ii''. '...`-•:: -.-- •,-5-:"-.•.:-.-•;-•,;,:;-.--,, , . 1-..'.. ;::',.. il---.5,' ','t,'7!..,..z)..,'.7i';1:.•'-:-. .,It3:.:;.;.,-4.7...'::.: ,1---',."-•1' ,..-2.::•; .-,.. ,, .....:, ,...- `-‘----:. ,•::.:::-...4AP,LE ,•,.-,;;-Av- . f:..::: :..,;:i1:;:•::';-',%'?•",••;:.•':-'..'.; .J.; x '-'..r....:•. 1 :::,,,,•::•••.,- . . ':.SI ;"':!•::;:-EILV "'Z0--...V.4.•21,11.; uLf•- ',,i_ ___-_ •••• -,•-4-14. l':•‘"--- '''''4---...H42 -.7 7•777.°-—--1•-•''77-I17.7.- ,::',•41";•,;‘, -4', ,_'4••':-41,-4,:.', ,';'..,,;:.:i .'f-4,',,' • . . , • . -''..4.• • ...:•,•;....74,1!,.•-•,. • :-.4).•..if:- :•.4:..,:-.:.'!''':"':•:Ir....:1;'...;-',:::T.-.,--.....:':*:.1:4 j•-•''.'-'.:'..•- ..3:.- an -...":','cn.'41.'..:::?.:;TH'.4,;.7.:•,. Ir.' °i, LEY..' 4--.-••• •-• . 1..•4'.•,-:-".-r•,,'.... ,,'"'...74-..'•-?%:::: .-... .1 r... ...:.. ";•'•-.. ....:.,.:„._,..... , :,:%.":,..•;•:::::••••:•-;''.''''."'..':"..."..,.'."'.'• / ::;,•''''''.•''-.•'-‘ '•'•-...• •'. .]. ,gs::::(:•,4rir.,5- . CO ' M „ .4.1.10,i F R WY..-. :-. ' ' ..,.., ,......':,•-.,<-1‘n .,••• ,.--i. ',:::-- ;.)i,t'•:;'?'::?.'!1-:,t;-:-'' : .‘ - a .'• ec. : l''...,,.-:i::::.',..n.i:::::-, 3'.,•:.:.z 1, - 1,'::: .,,, , :,..!.,... . •• , :',-..:::::::-.- ,,.,, i-..:: 1 : ....,:. A'-,='.>•:-.r . s NO_ .;,,,.,:.-1.1,.. i7- -,i.::.,:,--*,.77 '..•,,r;...A. , ----:-.:: ' .'1'.-'''.-',".•Y.:• '''"i-7.:''-'4' -614sT;.,.."••' L. '1••;-:•-•-..'.• '' '•"' •••• • '''• '`.••'' '- •, a •..,-,..,. ,;-,.,„,..,s% ...•• --,., ,t....,-.:,,..,....-m- -4. • •, -- . ' -',,,,''':" f"-si''',"..1,:". ''- sHA u-ck •Av s „,,,'',',1:: :•.•- ',..•- --.---', c • ,.. - :,,,IjC:.:W.. .:-.-•::;....•:':'•.::,>-... .. ..4.. .isuc't•'-44 PA-5 ,-444 . E-4,. z •. .. - .. - ."- ' •.. •'''4. • •'. :'WHIT ORTH•-n AV:S. . • ••. ... - :, /t, ° C. ' '21.;'.'Ogi-2•• '.— . ,,,,. . ,..i,, ,,;• F: ' ,,:.. ../- . ....,c„, • I•...SMITHERS AV S s -.., .. _ •• -,--I z -I- ., CI S;221•••4',4 x„, . xu.,..7,,,,• .-. .*.'••:". ..- rn • •• .,. ' 0 cs' sm,T.Ans cl 1. ,s. , ?...%;..-,,,,-.',.T. ... ..--1 •,'"? `2,-1 . -.• . . -.1-2 ,,, I %7 'P ''' C.6 \-)Vtos(1:1.1:;•:.N.?!.: WILLIAMS AV 5 , -'" - W. . i_— ____ 0.-S m m . : NOSN3a :1). E..i.1;11..F .,....... 6 • , . . / 1 ' ',••',' oc‘ -,..., .. - .. 0 ICEDARr< ' '-. . • :41.;.:c... :.-:" - \,.--- . AV H AV SE AV' S IIIIEI•ff.',..•:.•'- •••,.••• ,6,. , ...... - :,.,:., I • ,... .:,....•.•.•,i,,.. : CEDAR AV . 1) E a i I 1 TH AV SE •%."7 cn-1,7,.. -,?•„,'.'.'1..-:: S.J.3.,:ii.'4`...%;: .:4.-',. -'..;- .••1',,....--.-- ;-.4.-..,:;-,S.:.-,.•,:.-,,-ii ":'..• RENTON AV S . . I V11' 106TH AV SE r •...::t,'I:. ,r.r\i , ....., ..„:4;3••1. A.:•:.•1-,:••':: -..,•-,, ,,z4..:1•:-.....,.: 2- ',..,;;,..f: . .., .!•2,t,1,,,. u., . .-,:•, .• • A :74. /:,N'''1‘ '''''•:•':1:::'161-.1.'' .4:-,41. 4::--',..,.. F1 . r. ..--'.":...Y:,'',,..,'',",'... .,.--"„;:-. 24...,•-•r, • ,,,, • 4., u.,ici,i4 : ,•••. •%,-q,4..;ir....4, -e..4.,-• .,•••. ...,- • 4•••••••••••..-.;,:.4,s, • •:: HIGH • z ,,. C' SE1" rfi'-I'••.•-•.".• I'---''',.1 ...'.',''''';'`,'.••.F. 0 k-/+.1"e,„.•.•-.•..(2':.:,*. ,,:'. '.r\),_., i'l .c-r2:,„•..: -i' . .•.,.._.-, -- `11'4--11--.i..44.:41.4 L'4":'4'4,-'44.; 3•14':-.0"4:. "..4.." •':'''''...'• kJ ••-'..-•'''..4'.:''.: .•'441 JONES'''AV i , ,-,1 -i -. •, An X -4', , " '' I ?.,, !!. :! ,...:41- 151 CK CT SC KENNEWICKTrOSTH AV ./ "•_.••',":V.. .'',1, r •i: - . •‘•: '::', i',c)4-- ''..-•.:•i.i..t.:,.:7" , ',,. SE ql _./ LINCOLN,. '.-..". ,,"- LINCOLN." 7,.. 1..I..•::;,, ,.,.„,.... . . . • . . . , ".•' . . . . .‘.-." . . . • •.•;,:.,.: .. , ....f, . . •,,;.:;;4.::'.. DEVELOPED CONDITIONS New impervious areas proposed will include rooftops and paved or gravel driveways. The developed 100 year 24 hr peak storm water flows are less than 0.50 cfs more than the predeveloped peak flows and should not require detention under the current Renton nor King County standards. (Actual calculations demonstrate the difference is less than 0.14 cfs.) Rooftop runoff will be directed to splash blocks and dispersed into the landscape areas. Infiltration/spreader trenches will "biofiltrate " parking lot runoff prior to dispersion . Storm water analysis done with the King County software generates the pre and postdeveloped 2,10,4 100 year stormwater hydrographs using the SCS SBUH methodology. DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS A site visit was conducted 4(6(97 to determine potential drainage problems and or impact from the proposed development. The 1(4 downstream analysis included observation for items including: erosion, sedimentation, flooding, and or potential flow restrictions. Drainage leaves the site in a sheet low pattern and is directly intercepted by the Puget Drive storm water system. Catch basins along that curb were inspected during a heavy rain and appeared to be functioning well. Remaining stormwater running to the northwest is intercepted.within the apartment complex storm system parking areas and be directed to Grant Ave. and then return to Puget Drive. The downstream conveyance system appears in good condition and no restriction to flows nor flooding was observed. Erosion and sedimentation was not evident on or near the site. In Conclusion : • The downstream drainage corridor from the site is well established and has no significant drainage problems within 1(4 mile of the site. Well established storm conveyance is in place and functioning well. Developed flows from the proposed building site if controlled per approved construction plans, should have negligible affect on the downstream drainage peak flows. Analysis by: Dan Parrent, P.E. Brindle Storm Drainage Report PERCO#96022 2/11/97 DRP Page .340 • . ._C-4-z,Cve-A7_7041--s" eK( 7:1/V0 fra-55- Ave.c,J /-0-11 fs. )°(0 CO 7 45- r 5 /00 - fc44t 0 • r(03 /4-5- 0, 42. C.--eLih? .1E3 44/z..7.0 32_ o z - l, a -- o y, ---- ------------ --- // - C tgr2 CC-r cry' z - sq, Ica Q - -25' J o5, z CMG 02 17 -- ------- -- 0 ' O (?4 °°2-C. ) ' ? 9-c (-7/ • 67) geos) -sg)7a -Ds 1. - • �a ._ .. �•�� _ _ `,..-.^-:<---. \ =I = ':. .. •S oss��r ' —_ _ 7 — S I. - W 1 I • - •'-.�/. 1. ‘•.. - _Ai C3 0.� f ci..3 . • 68r dv7, /Z S6s.1o1 �J ( ) 5508 ( i1 i . : . >17OW ,9 1S/Xi' • ••' HW'SS;t7 + . I I tSbl ._...:„........„...." • L ll L �i r, • I F- / -- . rri . ...>7..,„..---1., a; . 1 r • . I • . ij . .. • 6 65 �,,h� �, . —�r,�i x q,f a I / c�ig�i, �g .,y I 5 I �n d- . Lh • . la • sI I • t,��-• 1 • . o N� I/' Y I. I . I • E _ p �r saCai-k• • 7 • . ..• S-.' . OS / k np 5( ......._...., .. . .... . . 1 fi....... .. . 1 F. , . f / �1- c . - --I- i, "osb •-•- < -g8 ? 1 f . . ��� 4 . • I • ihi iii . or . ; ______ pt: • 2,, — • � s .�� �• B 3��s /600 68N - i . ' • ' • �,� jk - fix try ;:� °� .+� ':..�d�:m-<�_.. ti'sue.. .r. ..__ .,. _._... t'";r�--s�'.. ..:c's:'�''�':';a,::: [-ti: a:� .., _ ,.. _ �. .. ,-,.:..„--_,,,-,,..,A.:„..„.,,,, - I I • y 55„8 c 1 s 9 d - -- - 24i, } L-----.-- cri . a'..7/>1.77S 79 1---4.1 I . . \ 1.) I 1% I . I. . I 41,5$60o6BS �00'OS/ ;/ I I t56c • 2 Z � /z S a \. .. r..7.7._' :::. . j ( /‘'k.r- -- ( . . _._.: ___ 2)/' N 6 . / • . . 1 I ./ - I =__� 88gi• —— _ �, • kiN • -:r Q y/LI vd7ctac 1)1 o 1 O 0--- o - CNN �0 q. ,6z /o • - ►I • • r—, 77/-7- 13_/.Y1\Cs — : , a iss. d I /11 • i 1 . / ' \S\ • Clf __11 . /' I 3-t�� ] • J -1 si.s-o a p -8 • -?8 is k . o ,� y Lo- - • o •os/ , _s--y—, ..------zg7-.__._.y_:: _____Lt. 1 .., g .a7„ss,60,be �� SOF 4-• F • N2/Y_gY1 / 0 Y /Sa'5ds/O dQ .1753 RENTON HEIGHTS TOWNHOUSES PREDEVELOPED STORM HYDROGRAPHS KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3- ROUTE 4- ROUTE2 5-ADDHYD 6- BASEFLOW 7- PLOTHYD 8- DATA 9- RDFAC 10- RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2- 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 2 24.00 1.95 S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION **AAAAAAk 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM """ 1.95"TOTAL PRECIP. *AAAAAAAk ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .4 85.0 .0 98.0 18.7 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 .4 85.0 .0 98.0 18.7 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .06 7.83 1181 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 2.EX Karl Best Storm Drainage Report PERCO#97032 2/11/97 page /Za SPECIFY: C- CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P- PRINT, S_STOP N STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S.TYPE-1A 2- 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: • 1 S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 10 24.00 2.85 S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.85" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER:A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .4 85.0 .0 98.0 18.7 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 .485.0 .098.0 18.7 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .13 7.83 2274 ENTER [d:][path]filename[ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 10.EX SPECIFY: C-CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P- PRINT, S - STOP N STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C:S. TYPE-1A 2- 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3- STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) . 100 24.00 3.85 S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION *********100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.85"TOTAL PRECIP. A*"'***** ENTER:A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO.: 1 7••- Karl Best Storm Drainage Report PERCO#97032 2J11/97 page .try- .._ ... ....:-•- .4 85.0 .0 98.0 18.7 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 .4 85.0 .0 98.0 18.7 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .21 7.83 3614 ENTER[d:][path]filename[ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 100.EX SPECIFY: C-CONTINUE, N- NEWSTORM, P- PRINT, S - STOP N RENTON HEIGHTS TOWNHOUSES POSTDEVELOPED STORM HYDROGRAPHS STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S.TYPE-1A 2- 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3- STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 2 24.00 1.95 S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 1.95"TOTAL PRECIP. **k*"`*""`* ENTER:A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .3 90.0 .1 98.0 8.4 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 • .3 90.0 .1 98.0 8.4 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .13 7.83 1860 ENTER [d:][path]filename[ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 2.DEV Karl Best Storm Drainage Report PERCO#97032 2/11/97 page I e/ 20 SPECIFY: C- CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP N STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 10 24.00 2.85 *********-"--****S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION *A*AA#AkAAAA k**AAAA AAAAAAAAA 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM '""'`* 2.85" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER:A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .3 90.0 .1 98.0 8.4 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 .3 90.0 .1 98.0 8.4 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .22 7.83 3134 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 10.DEV SPECIFY: C- CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S- STOP N STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2- 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION • ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 100 24.00 3.85 Karl Best Storm Drainage Report PERCO#97032 2/11/97 page ll/ S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION *""""****"*`*'``** " *"***"" 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM -*** 3.85" TOTAL PRECIP. ***A"'" ENTER:A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .3 90.0 .1 98.0 8.4 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS. TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 .3 90.0 .1 98.0 8.4 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .33 7.83 4607 ENTER [d:][path]filename[ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 100.DEV SPECIFY: C- CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S- STOP S Stop- Program terminated. — ke 5 c, oVw� d e- Gva t vitccc' CA-( wt 0-4c o te l s GC i c,S .n o f I. c l kitc-k -1- vocD4-H F Pit.trezt s . -ria ��cc..�� i,u a i l l,�e s to 5 b t o c. -ed cc,,, d.l vi o-1 d- ,i t -e C - y J 40 -Kft e- U t.S e.v-s c( ce /1 G €s — Q Se-� 1 k`- v1 e tc 4" S4 -cr4 c - C�✓ O Coot Cc v"t S o tl o t" -{-(ze-- l o o e- .. -P,,-e- post c(e u (0 F cr p e cc t - -4-(i Cc-i do c G(..". --`6-c-. V,e,,O . 4o a.v'G - S . Karl Best Storm Drainage Report PERCO#97032 2/11/97 page (2 10 RENTON HEIGHTS TOWNHOUSES 100 YR STORM HYDROGRAPHS (which includes Duplex footprint areas) KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 -ROUTE 4 -ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 -BASEFLOW 7 -PLOTHYD 8 -DATA 9 -RDFAC 10 -RETURN TO DOS • ENTER OPTION: • SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR),PRECIP(INCHES) 100 24.00 3.85 &Karl Best Storm Drainage ReportPERCO#97032 2/11/97 page 13 /ZU ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.85" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .5 85.0 .0 98.0 18.7 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(M1NUTES) A CN A CN .5 .5 85.0 .0 98.0 18.7 PEAK- (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .26 7.83 4371 ENTER [d:][path]filename[ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 100.EX SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N -NEWSTORM, P -PRINT, S - STOP C ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 .4 90.0 .1 98.0 8.4 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .5 .4 90.0 .1 98.0 8.4 T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 40 7.83 5514 ENTER [d:][path]filename[ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 100.DEV SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N-NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP S Stop -Program terminated. vt�� c s v e t c t • &Karl Best Storm Drainage ReportPERCO#97032 2/11/97 page «/ HYD KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: 9 R/D FACILITY DESIGN ROUTINE SPECIFY TYPE OF R/D FACILITY: 1 - POND 4 - INFILTRATION POND 2 - TANK 5 - INFILTRATION TANK 3 - VAULT 6 - GRAVEL TRENCH/BED 6 5 C- to �� � To�•�-cam ENTER Ed: ] [path] filename [ .ext] OF PRIMARY DESIGN INFLOW HYDROGRAPH: 10 .DEV PRIMARY DESIGN INFLOW PEAK = . 22 CFS ENTER PRIMARY DESIGN RELEASE RATE (cfs) : . 13 ENTER NUMBER OF INFLOW HYDROGRAPHS TO BE TESTED FOR PERFORMANCE (5 MAXIMUM) : 3 ENTER Ed: ] [path] f it ename [ .ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 1 : 2 .DEV ENTER TARGET RELEASE RATE (cfs) : . 06 ENTER Ed: ] [path] filename [ .ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 2 : 10 .DEV 1572o ENTER TARGET RELEASE RATE (Cfs) : ,. 13 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 3 : 100 .DEV ENTER TARGET RELEASE RATE (Cf s) : - - .21 ENTER: NUMBER OF ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD (ft) , RISER-DIAMETER (in) 1, 2 .5, 8 RISER OVERFLOW DEPTH FOR PRIMARY PEAK INFLOW = . 10 FT SPECIFY ITERATION DISPLAY: Y - YES, N - NO N SPECIFY: R - REVIEW/REVISE INPUT, C - CONTINUE R SUMMARY OF INPUT ITEMS 1) TYPE OF FACILITY: GRAVEL TRENCH/BED 2) STORAGE DEPTH(ft) : 2 . 50 , 3) VERTICAL PERMEABILITY(min/in) : 15 . 00 4) PRIMARY DESIGN HYDROGRAPH FILENAME: 10 .DEV 5) PRIMARY RELEASE RATE (cf s) : .13 6) NUMBER OF TEST HYDROGRAPHS : 3 PYez(eve,l O e J, .ga f es TEST HYD 1 FILENAME: 2 .DEV TARGET RELEASE (Cfs) : .06 TEST HYD 2 FILENAME: 10 .DEV TARGET RELEASE (Cfs) : . 13 TEST HYD 3 FILENAME: 100 .DEV TARGET RELEASE (cfs) : .21 7) NUMBER-OF-ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD (ft) , RISER-DIAM(in) : 1, 2 .50, 8 8) ITERATION DISPLAY: NO ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER ZERO IF NO REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED) : 0 INITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES : 921 CU-FT SINGLE ORIFICE RESTRICTOR: DIA= 1 . 74" PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET-OUTFLOW ACTUAL-OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: .22 .13 . 13 2 .50 158 TEST HYD 1 : 2Yre. .13 . 06 . 08 . 97 , 60 TEST HYD 2 : (OW., .22 . 13 .13 2 .50 150 TEST HYD 3 : 1oCY .40 .21 .39 2 . 61 150 SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STOP D PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET-OUTFLOW ACTUAL-OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: .22 . 13 . 13 2 .50 158 TEST HYD 1 : .13 . 06 . 08 .97 60 .TEST HYD 2 : . 22 . 13 . 13 2 . 50 150 TEST HYD 3 : .40 .21 . 39 2 . 61 150 hl-fl TE; P G v � :'p e . STRUCTURE DATA: GRAVEL TRENCH/BED (30 PERCENT VOID VOLUME) W ( p,15 o P vnlJ4e aci a 4- vcck 5-b,-a RISER-HEAD GRAVEL-BED-AREA STOR-DEPTH STORAGE-VOLUME 2 .50 FT 212 . 1 SQ-FT 2 . 50 FT 158 CU-FT SINGLE ORIFICE RESTRICTOR: DIA= 1 . 74" ( (SE ea. 3 � 2-•4TaS g1 Z,5` DAP ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) DISCHARGE (CFS) STORAGE (CU-FT) PERM-AREA(SQ-FT) .00 . 00 . 0 . 0 . 25 . 04 15 . 9 212 .1 .50 .06 31 . 8 212 . 1 . 75 . 07 47 . 7 212 . 1 1 . 00 . 08 63 . 6 212 . 1 1.25 .09 79 . 6 212 . 1 1 .50 . 10 95 .5 212 . 1 1 . 75 .11 111 .4 212 . 1 2 .00 .12 127 .3 212 . 1 2 . 25 . 12 143 .2 212 . 1 2 .50 . 13 159 . 1 212 . 1 2 . 60 .34 159 . 1 212 . 1 2 .70 . 72 159 . 1 212 .1 2 . 80 1 . 06 159 . 1 212 . 1 2 .90 1.20 159 . 1 212 . 1 3 . 00 1 .33 159 . 1 212 . 1 AVERAGE VERTICAL PERMEABILITY: 15 . 0 MINUTES/INCH SPECIFY: F - FILE, N - NEWJOB, P - PRINT IF/OF, R - REVISE, S - STOP F ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF ROUTING DATA: ZTE2 . IT FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? Y SPECIFY: F - FILE, N - NEWJOB, P - PRINT IF/OF, R - REVISE, . S - STOP S KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .20 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD l 7/� - ROUTE 4 - ROUTE2 5 - ADDHYD 6 - BASEFLOW 7 - PLOTHYD 8 - DATA 9 - RDFAC 10 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: 3 RESERVOIR ROUTING INFLOW/OUTFLOW ROUTINE SPECIFY [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] OF ROUTING DATA RTE2 . IT DISPLAY ROUTING DATA (Y or N) ? Y ROUTING DATA: STAGE (FT) DISCHARGE (CFS) STORAGE (CU-FT) PERM-AREA(SQ-FT) . 00 . 00 . 0 . 0 .25 . 04 15 . 9 212 . 1 .50 . 06 31 . 8 212 . 1 . 75 . 07 47 . 7 212 . 1 1 .00 . 08 63 . 6 212 . 1 1 .25 . 09 79 . 6 212 . 1 1 .50 . 10 95 .5 212 . 1 1 . 75 . 11 111 . 4 .212 . 1 2 . 00 . 12 127 .3 212 . 1 2 . 25 . 12 143 . 2 212 . 1 2 .50 . 13 159 . 1 212 . 1 2 . 60 .34 159 . 1 212 . 1 2 . 70 . 72 159 . 1 212 . 1 2 . 80 1 . 06 159 . 1 212 . 1 2 .90 1 .20 159 . 1 212 . 1 3 . 00 1 .33 159 . 1 212 . 1 3 . 10 1.45 159 .1 212 . 1 AVERAGE PERM-RATE: . 0 MINUTES/INCH ENTER [d: ] [path] f it ename [ .ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 2 .DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS : PEAK-INFLOW(CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) OUTFLOW-VOL(CU-FT) . 13 . 09 1853 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) . 00 8 . 00 1 .35 PEAK STORAGE: 80 CU-FT ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: GAR SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, P - PRINT, S - STOP, R - REVISE R &NTER REVISED "PERM-RATE" : 15, 1 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 2 .DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS : PEAK-INFLOW (CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) .13 . 08 1273 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) . 00 8 . 00 . 98 PEAK STORAGE: 60 CU-FT INFILTRATED VOLUME: 581 CU-FT ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 2 .OUT FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? Y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, P - PRINT, S - STOP, R - REVISE C ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 10 .DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS : PEAK-INFLOW(CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW (CFS) OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) .22 . 13 2266 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) . 00 8 . 00 2 .50 PEAK STORAGE: 150 CU-FT INFILTRATED VOLUME: 937 CU-FT ENTER [d: ] [path] f ilename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 10 .OUT FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? Y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, P - PRINT, S - STOP, R - REVISE C ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 100 .DEV INFLOW/OUTFLOW ANALYSIS : PEAK-INFLOW(CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW(CFS) OUTFLOW-VOL (CU-FT) . .40 .39 4255 1 INITIAL-STAGE (FT) TIME-OF-PEAK (HRS) PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) . 00 7 . 83 2 . 61 13/ PEAK STORAGE: 150 CU-FT INFILTRATED VOLUME: 1360 CU-FT ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 100 .OUT FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ? y SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWJOB, P - PRINT, S - STOP, R - REVISE /40 1 APPENDIX • • KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL-- I Exemptions From On-Stte Peak Rate Runoff Control j' On-sitepeak_ . : . •. :: �,-.,...sod project In the following situations . `•-- 1) Neoli t< le Pik Runoff Rate Increase': !" - o The proposed project site post-developed peak runoff rate for the 100-year, 24-ho •-•' :I , duration design storm event is calculated to be less than 0.5 cfs more than the pre- • .. developed peak runoff rate for the proposed project site existing runoff conditions. OR 5ubj'ec-f--Fa vef4. ties II o The project proposes to construct 5.000 square feet, or less, of new Impervious surface. ii1. 'Proposed projects In designated.critical drainage areas requiring stricter peak runoff rate or runoff volume controls shall not qualify,for this exemption. • OR • I . (2) DIrect Dlscharoe:'_ The proposed project will discharge surface and stormwater runoff without on-site peak rate !•!' runoff control directly-to: . . A-Regional Facility. Direct discharge of surface and stormwater runoff to a regional facility will ij be.allowed tf: the facility has been demonstrated to adequately to control the proposed. ;1 1 project's increased peak rate of.runoff by an adopted IGng County basin plan or,by a'detailed drainage analysis approved by the SWM Division;the facility will be available by•the time of - • construction of the project;AND, the conveyance system between the proposed project and 1' the regional facility.wfl be adequate for the proposed project's design peak runoff with no 11 significant adverse impacts. i . A•ReceMng Water. Direct dtscharge of surface and stormwater'tunoff to the following. !.i . receiving waters maybe allowed. Proposed prof ects that require Master Drainage Plans(see • .Special Requirement ,fr3) shalt demonstrate no significant adverse impacts from direct discharge to a river. • Cedar River • Green/Duwamish River (below river mile 6.0. F_E.MA) ! Puget Sound I' Lake Samrnamish Samrnamish River ! Skykomtsh River Snoqualmie River ' Lake Washington . White/Stuck River I• A Lake, Wetland or Closed Depression. See Special Requirement #8: Use of Lakes. Wetlands or Closed Depressions for Peak Rate Runoff Quantity Control. In Section 1.3.8. The applicant ;; should note that many takes, wetlands or dosed depressions will not qualify for this11 exemption. ii. .1' **Projects qualifying for Direct Discharge must meet the requirements of Special Requirement if. #5: Special Water Duality Controls In Section 1.3.5. i• i rya ``' ' , ,,,Y, r KI`,NGgCOUNTY, Wi --IING'TON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL ': 1 f - ~ .' TABLE 3.5.2B SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS .•i • SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type 1A rainfall distribution. 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC SO OUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION A B 40 D Cultivated land(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89 Wood or forest land: undisturbed or older second growth 42 64 76 81 Wood or forest land: _ young second growth or brush 55 72 81 •86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. good condition: grass cover on 75% or more of the area 68 80 86 90 fair condition: grass cover on 50% to 75% of the area 77 85 90 92 Gravel roads and parking lots • 76 , 85 89 , 91 - . Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 87 89 - Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs, etc. • 98 98 98 98 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 100 Single Family Residential (2) ' .Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) • 1.0 DU/GA , 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA 30 impervious portion • '3.0 DU/GA 34 . ., of the site or basin ,. 3.5 DU/GA • 38 • 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 • 5.5 DU/GA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 Planned unit developments, % impervious condominiums, apartments, must be computed commercial business and industrial areas. . (1) -'For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering =. Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology; Chapter 9, August 1972. . , . (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/stohri system. _ (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. • II/9"2-2:3 ::;•.; s: Fa 1. KING COUNTY, WA IINGTON, SURFACE WA 'I . DESIGN MANUAL (• TABLE 3.5.2C "n" AND "k" VALUES USED IN TIME CALCULATIONS FOR HYDROGRAPHS ' ; a.8 -O.4r25 L) li ) -e Sheet Flow Equation Manning's Values(For the Initial 300 h of travel) , �^Z`0'���O�O,¢ Sm>.-rh surfaces(concrete,asphalt,gravel,or bare hard packed soh) 0.011 Fak+fields or loose soil surface(no residue) 0.05 • _t Ceti-wed soil with residue cover(s <=0.20 h/h) 0.06 ' _ (JtKsted soil with residue cover(S> 0.20 h/h) 0.17 ' 2 ! ShM prairie grass and lawns 0.15 • Dense grasses 0.24 • '• •Bermuda grass 0.41 • a I • Rance(natural) 0.13 i l « - Woods or forest with light underbrush 0.40 3 i Nbais or forest with dense underbrush 0.80 l 1 •AUnning values for sheet flow only,from Overton and Meadows 1976(See TR-55. 1986) • • 'k-Values Used In Travel Time/Time of Concentration Calculations V "I 5 O ,3 S,Ulow Concentrated Flow (After the Initial 300 ft.of sheet flow,R -0.1) k, _ ij 1• Forest with heavy ground liner and meadows(n=0.10) 3 �/ ) 2. Brushy ground with some trees(n -0.060) 5 !' :. Fallow or minimum tillage cultivation(n'0.040) 8• II. . 4. High grass(n =0.035) 9 j11 S. Short grass, andpasture lavihs(n=0.030) 11 !r 6. Nearly bare ground(n=0.025) 13 • r 7. Paved and gravel areas(n.0.012) 27 it . U r..T(r ! Channel Flow(Intermittent)(At the beginning of visible channels:R.0.2) k, • i,. _ 1. Forested Swale with heavy ground litter(n =0.10) 5 • ' 2. Forested drainage course/ravine with defined channel bed(n=0.050) t0 s ' 3. Rock-lined waterway(n=0.035) 15 1 • 4. Grassed waterway(n=0.030) 17 l., i 5. Earth-lined waterway(n.0.025) 20 • Iy 6. CMP pipe(n=0.024) 21 a 7. Concrete pipe(0.012) 42 5 • & Other waterways and pipes 0.508/n ( - Channel Flow(Continuous stream,R =0.4) k. , a - 9. Meandering stream with some pools(n<0.040) 20 to. Rock-lined stream(n-0.035) ' . _ 23 ' _ 11. Grass-lined stream(n.0.030) 27 ' 12. Other streams,man-made channels and pipe 0.807/n'• ' ••See Chapter 5,Table 5.3.6C for additional Mannings•n•values for open channels 3 -i=:;- ..,.. -. . • . . . ..-... may.. s • i9t 'r Jy 5.. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.2A HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP OF THE SOILS IN KING COUNTY HYDROLOGIC HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP GROUP•. SOIL GROUP GROUP• Alderwo - Orcas Peat D ,, erwood Material C Oridia D - Arents, Everett Material B - Ovall C Beausi;e C -- Pilchuck C -- Bellingham D Puget D - Briscot D Puyallup B - Buckley D -- Ragnar B - Coastal Beaches Variable Renton D Earlmont Silt Loam D Riverwash Variable Edges+ick C Salal C - Everett A- Sammarnish D — Indianola A - Seattle D Kitsap C Shacar D - Klaus C - Si Silt C • Mixed Alluvial Land Variable Snohomish D _• Neilton A - Sultan C Newberg B Tukwila D Nooksack C Urban Variable Normal Sandy Loam D Woodinville D HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS A. (Low runoff potential). Soils having high infiltration rates, even when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of deep,well-to-excessively drained sands or gravels. These soils have.a high rate of water transmission. r- B. (Moderately low runoff potential). Soils having moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of moderately fine to moderately coarse textures. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. ' C. (Moderately high runoff potential). Soils having slow Infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water, or soils with moderately 1 fine to fine textures. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. • D. (High runoff potential). Soils having very slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a hardpan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. • • From SCS,TR-55, Second Edition,June 1986, Exhibit A-1. Revisions made from SCS, Soil Interpretation • i. . Record, Form #5, September 1988. f{I • • , f " •j- ':i":•.; '1.":-Z.t.'"•I'F':"-,'-:'. ;'' '; . . . '". •••:1:.'.,:'' ..;:.:'"''f, "i'::"'.•,:::•:: : yii_1 • - _ `j; .:=�' 3.5.2-2 1i9O y 1 il_' .,yV 'H r . '- ,,.K1NG COUNTY. WASH GITON. SURFACE WATER SIGN M"XNUAL Section 33 ¬ion 3.5.1 Design Storm Ilytaognph a ' Hy Analysis Hydrograph Method FIGURE 3.5.1C 2-YEAR 2.4-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS • _ i '\ a�I•���. al .,. \I-- f iT ArlI ii .1 3Imo- IS•i�• f' ky i it&i �,lli 1 r i ntL - dig l ik 1 12' Argieflii '411 Vat ' 1\4*.."Illia &"7P . . lci golivillk Vela%%V ag il-Al ' ,ifigmell-ispri-- \I , 4,,i'n, Al isli 1 iq . --7_4111 Liffliii s__,, ii 1 . : --a or-sprizall i ,, \• g ' kq ,, • . I" i ‘ )11 LI. r' •` r 1IL4aIiit11r [ i . %%, Ill ' 1 !alk•V or \ --- I otiN, 4.; — ..,4 ..k.e.,„,ak -- ,.. %ice - itikatriarAIM :F#A, ' • kk , • 4;.._. .• 4.44-4R.Famenr.,___,..... ..ow ^.4 - .1 -,. ..-: III\ will 4.m.va It I. .1000011MP •41C0 AS ow.' WI VIIIIIIS__`411511111 —derioir . Valkik V\ A _ i ! / 11-47/Aviirmoiowsi, &,,,,-- 1 iti,,,,,t, ...% ,-;., livic , iT,/ , ((di, - . • / ..:11111‘841t 1 711:14r*Vkl‘ W 1r/ 14. , gr,, , _ - it% -ii, iNtr :IAN . . r..... --- . = ,,g.,f,ir . . i/:.,i,.1i i.... ..,.1, ,\r ta. w sr vpi..' . a,..l1.y iOiiisffiili t._gil a_ .<< . , - tea:\o\N ,... iiail. . %\; i 'Powinitill --i.--. . „,4 ;mit L - �I -cam• li milk -::._‘,.‘,44‘, `ups` / -- -%. Off # I IPIIIBM - ' '.. ' 4pyy„,.._,.... 14111. 4.5.AtIvi,d1 \\ . .0 I*11-= _ #. ,. i bralpdpillitireL. ‘6:. , . .., . , .-p 7 .. Y. W.1 Alt )ir I Ai h r. . gip ! i / A16111114 1171:.• - I flaw • ___- r ..„ , ....= , , , c‘.1. 1._ _._ •- 06.=, lit jc el lielpi A-31/4 'Sc".) 1 (V MY .1.:. idrli*IIII 2111:11N1141114- te . 4 . .., 4„: . ...., ,c____ , I 011 - . \. , k, /VP, Pr- /40 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION. i Ma 1 , r 3.4 �` 1SOPLUYIALS OF 2-YEAR 24-HOUR r 3,� TOTAL PRECIPITATION 1N INCHES11411 :::. :y.,--,.11.:,`:::„.: ,f��.� I -• "I''.•• DRAFT-- :ice.:•S1e�?%w: s!...: A„:-.F.,�..,,..,t `y,,a. f . . o � Z . - , . GTON. UR� ACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL ;. N7y, WASHIN !' ! _ ydoe i Soctim 3.5 Scrfirn 3_5.1 Duie o Storm H n - Hydrognph Method c R 24 HOUR 1SOPLUVIALS ._ _._._ i S.lE 10-YEA - - - - _ •- - :� . _ `_ • ice,- = - - - mac- .ram ti _ f `'` . I li#_ ,j i A., , _.. -a ,-, .,,,,_,..r,10 . . 23 .!\ 4.21tilityr %knit jiirbk 1 A , . . . , , , 2.4 ' i - _Mara /41 Ar-Alliz llik ' -- - , 1. is 'AIN m ogrir 10 6..._. ., .. •5 Ad etrAillk 4PO.PtflkrAtllitk , , , g .1" I , 3.0 : <-.-----,:-..‘soplo.r/ —(11411W1001146114r1:. . I „ Nnil . - km-tiorgir. itsirmatfry. .7. , •j . PI '4;.'' 1 4.vilikeitel......ii,...itire , , 1 1 1 . 3.1 i,C .....4,, al . it"' #01-10--• -,4*-.4517,, iiir.db‘- , ''':'. - %TIM% ' )4? A '44/ .4.11,4 , :, ltip-A-41/41- ' i• ' Ill t— el. — 5 i OArll 1 4.7 . i ,11111116-P-Atimiww*, _.. .11410 1 -- --7---\: I'OIIhMkwleiS 1i iV\,'.\li I 1(., ..—fi„o—.-7..4A,4P-1/4 1Ik'.1!#1h.h1,%W. k. p1‘tl io . : _ r -. - w . :0 v tiff,,. .., I :F.:.. Ili I-.seljedit", 4.4. ' '7„ J) _.= , , 1 grfilita-yir+1 olLnti! --4v-..efirod 4 t%t • \ . ..t. 1 _ .... _ ..... . 'I- . " 'IIIIIR k• -., . \.._::. wit i , , 1 iti,„._ 0„, ,,. w ed _ .„...... V. mu - :'!II gip.41 113111. aiii*A4 1k ' : , 11:117 Ude irligkiir ridAC'4S&N /I lip ak y'- 1� f iiiMilill ':.!_., . .., \ -i, _. _.- - , ----;,:%/ig plaittupi _ - .. ( • ...._ 1 . r Its ...a., amid ..:, ,,. . _ .. . I -10 ita • . . Ahlr ....r. , ... _ .\ •. '-if I '. ft1X0/11.7141$1 ,. r 4 A *I , , .,„.,,,.,.. . viiiiirpi-4011.01 41 I, . • . • . • ;,,„.„ .,: • . , . .. . . . . . • ) viehr41•41 . ,.. ..._ ',i=' i.•-` 10-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION ik'r�Pos tt 3 4 ISOPLWIALS OF 10-YEAR 24-HOUR Ariffai1 1 r td I TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES . .r--•'T� `i•ir' jam."' a+ti- _ 'ri:� a �'ea' `s ... ':F.e- _•fR._. 'r'•:!. r1+s 1iMr^.. .•A. - •icr.�..r KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL I I FIGURE 3.S.1H 100-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS • ' . 3./ ' '"ittiati v4111. iii 414 `�� .. r�� ` fir/3 i _ _ . .-, a ir�3 i � isw.rlit-egigri Mat al ` .0 . ..4altIVAli rillig.h.a PATII 4., • •„,_ ......A.,.....-,s- Ir'----toll.° ipt A i - 14:3Vie. - iy ) 1 4.3 _ ,1l, : , - , :�� 1 ►. R/� ....4, • •., -,..ffigh...mr ‘ ..„, ,riA ,Ai . 1 4 `'- _ 0 .-t litietommisi to-st., : , „ilk:"... - ., -.. j trop,---wr.,...r,,..............,..„14,,, 4kt IS, �,1- • -ii• ill .....% _ �• rr� .em .—ik � ►'0 iff AtillfA cceili:A1011 -- -..alia illidbiP 1 IT min riktilk ,. kINVO400.11.1.400041111. r - - lt, N._ _Issitk, , lor -Ityliaimeo jfklik_. ,..... .2.1. r,.... . ./..,,y . \ E- 1%.‘nwpopyAglikiI Nk. lor • . . *0 intw, ---; tor A-A-w1-7-1LN \ f ! 161'1111 1 -; .„LI,Nor. Ai g , .\A _.) \ -- . , i I 1011111114, .... ... ouglimuil ( . ....:‘,..,.. V•ii\al or 410 o "11/4' lialkl • ' i , 111401 I I I:= * .1111111kfuf.. "--,,,r- Alk , . ..../ ..`. : iit i 10, , ge It lapoolil ,.. 1110. • , , ) , RI . r:L° l!1 1 i I( // ��� - _- l _ -. -1....16_,4,.„,h_ Airlift-0 N.4) ,--4.'. y5, , , . . \-\.1---- Wilit.4 •figeRiWW- lia p 1 1-Arlf '' . p. . / i _ • r.,:, . - , , ifiriw' arslirlieNiPliwiliorti itit ilf . . i . ...:"--!:,..- • fi .ig,. . t4. . VrillrArS. .. 100-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION �. VifirAIR4FIN 3.4----ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 24HOURrga '=` etAr TOTAL PRECIPITATION M INCHES I �.• -�illirrAligr/ = = - - t 1 . -- - . - ".'1C%irk 3,•v , • 3- ..:-:. ..n...:.... ... ... ,,. .=.: - - - -,•��;% .•row , e•: Slohomish CountyAea,Washn9ton - _ - .=.: ..,._ . _ 7 0,,. • • a SOILS _ - TABLE 14.--PHYSIC:.�• •'" ' •• AL` AND' CHEMICAL PROPERTIES.Of -. [The symbol < means less than; > means more -than: Entries under "Erosion factors--T" apply to the entire profile. Entries under "Organic matter" apply only to the surface layer. Absence of an entry indicates.: ,_ 1;. ifc that data were not available or were not'estimated] IIh : : Erosion : 1 Soil name and :Depth:Clay <2mm Permeability Available Soil : Shrink-swell ; , factors 10r.ganic,..._.,- : it li water capacity . reaction: potential-'; ' -: :• matter : .:•_: , . , , . .. . : K I T i : In i Pct : In/hr .• : In/in _ ' pH 1 I , I 11 , .. r 1 , 2, 3 0-7 : 5-10 2.0-6.0 0.07-0.11 :5.1-6.5 :Low :0.20: 2 5-10. i� ' Alderwood : 7-35: 5-10 : 2.0-6.0 : 0.07-0.11: :5.6-6.5 :Low 10.201 .". , --- , --- , 1 . 1 !' , I I I i 4". : I Alderwood 0-7 5-10 2.0-6.0 0.07-0.11 '5.1-6.5" :Low 10.200 2 5-10 :': 7-35 5-10, 2.0-6.0 , 0.07-0.11 5.6-6.5 :Low 1 0 ' I , i I ,: ' '0.17: 1 10-15 Everett : 0-6 : 5-10 : ' 2.0-6.0 : 0.08-0.12 15.6-6.5 ;Low , 6-18: 5-10 : 6.0-20 : 0.05-0.08 :5.6-6.5 :Low :0.10: :18-60: .0-5 : 6.0-20 : , 0.02-0.05 :5.6-6.5 :Low :0.10: : l Ili 5*, 6*: : : : • - , , ,. . : : Alderwood : 0-7 : 5-10 : 2.0-6.0 : 0.07-0.11 :5.1-6.5 :Low :0.20: 2 : 5-10 Si. : 7-351 5-10 : 2.0-6.0 : 0.07-0.11 :5.6-6.5 :Low :0.20: : .. Urban land. : : ; :I I I i11,! 7 ; 0-9 : 15-30 : . 0.2-0.6 : 0.20-0.24 :5.6-6.5 :Low :0.32: 5 : 10-15 Bellingham : 9-60: 40-60 : 0.06-0.2 : 0.20-0.24 :6.1-7.3 :High 10.24: : : I I I I 8 0-6 27-35 i 0.2-0.6 0.19-0.21 :5.1-5.5 ;Moderate :0.32 5 : 10-15 [ i Bellingham 6-42 35-45 : 0.06-0.2 0.18-0.21 :4.5-5.5 :High :0.32 : Variant 42-60 12-30 : 0.2-0.6 0.14-0.16 :4.5-5.0 :Moderate :0.32 : p 10 11 0-8 : --- : 0.6-2.0 0.18-0.20 14.5-6.0 ;Low Low :0.37: 5 : 5-10 Ii Cathcart 8-35 - --- 0.6-2.0 0.13-0.17 :5.1-6.5 :Low :0.43 : 35-60 --- 0.6-2.0 0.14-0.17 :5.1-6.5 :Low :0.37 ' : I I ;I k 12". i , i �' • , , ' i Cryohemists , , , few, 10-15 , 2.0-6.0 - 0.13-0.15 :5.6-6.0 :Low ,0.28, --5 - 5-10 _ t 3 : 0-9 : . ;_ Custer : 9-35: 0-10 : 0.2-0.6 0.06-0.08 :5.1-5.5 :Low :0.24: 1 :35-60: 0-10 : >20 0.06-0.09 :I 5.6-6.0 :Low • :0.10: I I 3 i I '' 0.6-2.0 0.22-0.26 :3.6-5.5 :Low :0.37: 2 , 10-15 14 , 0-2 , --- , , Elwell : 2-231 --- : 0.6-2.0 0.19-0.23 :5.1-5.5 :Low 10.43: i.' :23-27: --- : , 0.6-2.0 0.09-0.13 :5.1-5.5 :Low :0.281 , E,L' : 27 : --- , --- , , , gg:. 15*: ' ' 1 0.6-2.0 0.22-0.26 :3.6-5.5 Low :0.37: 2 : 10-15 , u Elwell : 0-2 : --- : i : 2-23: --- : 0.6-2.0 - 0.19-0.23 :5.1-5.5 Low 10.431 23-27: --- 0.6-2.0 0.09-0.13 :5.1-5.5 Low --10.281 Olomount : 0-2 --- 0.6-2.0 ' 0.13-0.16 :5.1-5.5 Low 10.24;J "2 1 .2-5 I11 : 2-18 --- 0.6-2.0 0.11-0.14 :5.6-6.0 Low 10.281 , ' :18-32 --- 0.6-2.0 0.08-0.10 • 5.6-6.5 Low :0.28: : , : . --- --- --- --- :----: d - 32 I. > v_::- 'Elwell 0-2 --- : 0.6-2.0 . 0.22-0.26 3.6-5.5 Low :0.37: 2 : 10-15 % • 2-23 --- : 0.6-2.0 0.19-0.23 5.1-5.5 Low , 10.431 - 23-27 --- : 0.6-2.0 , . 0.09-0.13 5.1-5.5 Low :0.281 '7' See footnote at end of table. - t Yy-' - : . v - • - _ = mow:" JNINKtnd J..N?I.NdOI-3A3C! ipirolf)m AO iSadOic Uillitrt(41:14 ' ' ' •RAM:4V=iva FA1 f 1 faill7aA4g 4910.43, .....0 w ' \uni .//731D .79 Qi Q 4 1gj __. _ I .�:: .1 -ems: ae,.`; . ._ ..6E,.vim .1 - ....._.. ...._ .„ 4, . ^r . +' ,.-fi, g� 6 . �':: < w': , - .:.,4ii.;,'.-..- r.O rt r.:.. �e1 ®,`` .y C.4. . ;1 .3.J 7. dx_ .y,. Z£ Ob&d01 -- -- - ' :.. ' r^b. .,. V •' .. ' S us/ ,, ;. I-- • :'. ': r, rrx r • ram:. M /N. M . • .f „z/ • .,„-:,•.". M ae T -i^3• -i+c K.i< t`'.G: -rr!/ '.. ,tic ) n_� ;;.'Y'"•�'. , 9rt�X. F: �3a%ni::P,... :., ..._8�u A1y w7 N _ :/Y7 ..,. «: {---''9a777 14/X3 a•69Fd01 ;-I 60'09S'37 1 •9:7'X.7 II It Eg•Arm a•56sdot .tii t . SS.,8 kI �5,b— HN•SS X9 I I - 7bM ,7 :LS/X3 O I I y ' ���F9/71 S a'9M9S 'Xa'- I J J .:I•'.1 r• 1 H J .WN/7 »9 O a • + ,s4 .., + M„SS,60o6ELS. •. : r ,•S� �O/ II L ` .. �� 1I • 30, 7s on7I ail/ 1 - a dcl SI2 �,£b �c 5Z _ `d • HScY7dS rf. I ff - (oikl) •'1 ' • (QOZ 77G I'• ':'• Q: ,'- X 7d/70 ';•=1 dda :.610N 1:2*;•_r. c.f.„is.:L. „ „_1 6 l c,o/ -I :.• liN Ile. l' . .: C-) 1 1\ . - . ‘•`.7.- - N 4 -. ,11:7e I 1-I--(..p lag;..41..'..i. •-c------: - -/A ::-- : / '6Z 107 _� I •:. • Z Ei id •• • aaHP5/v - : ' I / z o ' , oA _s 0 41 A. _ , „, ... c. . . . . ...i., %z ..,„ ,z „GO :Oppri7— ) — --1. -, • tie- / / fir:,_ • ,Vz. .. ..�. 1; a •, � /Pc b' I 7 11.;.,...:..... / ,;. /:)...1: t.#1 ..,'011 I Z7 7717' rA.I2 jl • • (d 1 I '�• 9 d9 k . 0 016 7N0� I /' I . r eelibi:•:Fe :Ii, Vd;./...)..4,1y7(t ce. i / ••:;•! d�J/YO . 8Z 107y n.: I• . 6. =✓� It•i- e, ', '` cg dd 1 71 N , \ • I —4 . 7, x /Y/�d'dd - ' 6Z 107 5 aF 7 097/d/.b \ _F„SS,6,0968N '7 XOa'dCd Q cis NO/';7,9dS/O d0 .2'7.,Z N **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9702318 Amount : 1, 562 . 95 04/16/97 11 : 59 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #1591 BEST CONST Init : LMN Project # : LUA97-051 ; Type : LUA Land Use Actions Location: 1500 BLOCK S . PUGET DR. Total Fees : 1, 562 . 95 This Payment 1, 562 . 95 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 562 . 95 Balance : . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 341 . 60 . 00 . 0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 8 . 55 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 . 42 . 1 Postage 54 .40 City of Revenue/Creel Date: Source: City Clerk Amount: Account Code: 000.000.00. 338.58.( Description: Appeal i' M a • i