Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA87-058 " = w~ Am- ------------ in 91 ZZ tA Us cr DAVID L. HALINEN Attorney At LawA"---_ e Suite moo,Plaza Center Building "� logo°Northeast Eighth Street _, , Bellevue,Washington 98004 'Oil Oa/ g-off_iy • , ,, ,._/1): doe/ Mr . Donald Erickson �-H. ^+, cry 1.I, , - -`,-iw ' ';,its, •,;,. , ,•, :_.•_,• _ ,__ _ .., . , l' --oral Fx ��. ....,„,•. ,.• ,•_,, .. - . aN ii� I �' l'N , ,, , xE 6' ''.7 1 I -me , .,,ice'. ... P g .0 ... l� -- .; 5 r'.. _ '6 VIc IN,- _ MAP, usu..... .9, _1_ • VAT-A---- h ydL,.ILb rrd',•,o.lU ny.oy.. 6./,-12i ,.40,-, rr'rM Pre,. rfr4.04^0 JIr G, r/.MbcY^ 4di rrr•wrW r--,Irty 4.eV, i --------------------- • �__ -- - � ` << �/ + --t^'�� - ate. -.--- _ _ Eunfl 4 J -. �eaar� � 73 ° Lxy .. Irwwu..r..r J - — i 0444�. r 8i 1 Vim+ tilt': i ' ! L ' ' �' ! �i_ . . 1 1 .' i�: 11 r. °:• L`v..a�w rl .•+1 1Mxw +r�w - �—_�x——__ � 9 E FI �4, I �IIII� III (1IILIIIIIInIII !IIII�s0'. ! III I I � Y- --1'''''' 1/0." "1. EAST VALLEY ROAD e1 14. --3H _� antuM��l4v-e�iin wi.,A,1 i r .p l i` el- _� • a 1 tZe 116110611 a�, Awl`�' • 61 I I I BLDG.q 3 I F.I. ELEV..20.0 I --- I co li oss.S.Mr ass.u•S F.G.GLEJ.ago 11 DLO...II 1 cis F.F. !LW 7D.0 1- 1 �/ a .. p (� 9 u I a .Y „ Z S .n.�..,1 ay �� ee`� 19r, se'"I N' oly �� cv © e ZL § sr.M •YratMldirt e-. 3 r) ill •�Ge ce ��' NS - EMI - IL'ew.5e s�.•nl !� Ge iiiitJ�ry __4.. V O _ _ ��'a�.. ^.�i J -\ Y%; ^r•. 2 a $1 t IIII t— ';'' �— c-R�----- fie i-- � - --'� — -- —.b 1� --� �.�--�— �-- —`�—��'—a .��- -� op g IIII ti i eji - EnsT VALLe•i I,• torso ku a e ke• w; \IIIIsa w .,�. s. �., u _ �.., — -� �.., ` ,I e ow �7'' —� —fir —— 6_ „rtx J— � Q ¢[ Weer ee.„p re.�.[!•wr WOOVIS N _._._._.__________._.______--- s Gli . __ __ .(N . .....---1/7"------ 1 • . _ 4.a- %1• ----------- , . �Lr ' I I I I- - 1 --�r I I Q II '' 1 I W i �Z moss,•2 DLDG.1t 3 * F.F. EL¢,/.20.0 F.P. ELEV.20.0 E T, i u j I I 3 '` I 'n 1 — I DLOG.a 1 / 1 Ice ,�j Z 3 FF.ELEV.20.0 1 7 V1 � x , . I I n, II; J l� il. .� _„. ry F z W yy C R C Y 0 ,..[en.w�1� 1. .. Y Z., 4 ['•K+M .,,[Y r41 `- y •w L ce h,otN N' • H nn� /1 1 sl ID .x �Swl.eeYet . ,, �R....4 [e �1 �� I� .—. �.. 0 C s .e---- �. ia— e1 'x'�r— — �---- —�...,s--�'- PNo awo 4. —4- IIII a I '° ar EAST 4LLE/I e,Qo�c I 1,_?(.... ...,_ i^.poi-s-e� �� m JA.r/ Ke eio�c.00 7� e A,P2 I ' I • • • • . IIIII, �III� • 1 i=l III • III I!! . ill III iii _ • iii - =1 III Hi n I III III ti '.l 1 IIII • - 1�1 IlUl I Il III III • I 11 IIII' , ul0 ut - �y7 Iw. III Ill IIII Ill III Ill 1i1 =I . m'ei Ill . AI III III • III 111111 III ei iii m Iii • MI . III 1 . . . .. . . .. . . . . . i ,,. mTwr Mxsl -1I 4J GOHnn -d 1 lance mueller e....,. toS associates architect. Ma 'kofi,vf�i14. �`� 1 II I • Iuul I min IUIII\ . i ) IIIIl.I, . I • ,1, ,,\ s 1 1 ` a I' iii iiiu" , ' iii l 1MI r �`,� i• I 1 III I 4 I i ii 11 1■ IN I . II I II.iII II _;i nil 1■ 1■1 s ,. c OL1 . IN NI 1• • III ri III I7 11 i1IE � t j�2 111 i la 1 III or i . . , _.. f 'uM,-.y/*f tysw n/Wi=4w*w 4 1J10r.1 4A1"k..ih =p,•=. lance myelleocular al: associate 10�, \v44 1. erchitecte aia S • 1111 iii 1 — II1 1�1 _ II 111 — . lel ll IIII I . i • I.I 1 III . III 1 III -j. 11111 III 1.1 1� . ill iii - u iii w I1 m I., u . . Ili ill 1 s1 i . III ' liii mINIII • _ 1�11 w�,e Ill III 111111` • IN iii • wil - Ill 1E1 m . IllUFO u11� ill 111)11 WIIYIII1III 21 11u1 i=I I Il1he ii�1111 g1� \ 1 q1I:I I ;EMI:I! . • : IN BSI III x! - cell1I1 III ail I • un €a III. ivll . MaEUMIIu*''e.tR'4T J 1%4A sF*ALi.0 I I JrO,-I e,4Mruh lc i l nce mueller f associatew ro!\v.z•,,i4dirol.1 s arehitecte eie 130 I.eeeleo•ones*omen 13131122.OM vYe UM= • .9.i rr y >. is, Z�a6 4 lli .1 A 4r$ 114;1 = n 4 5 Z 1/11$1 0 iti il W ?1) il 1/ r3 idlPili ' '° $ F ;f 5 € F _ � Ili ii ,t_ 42 q 010 isivi \Wg -..z f- 0'lift f�: tIP Ili ti ii 144 $ .i.. �z tECIE t Y� � 9 6 t pi t I; \I \Y 1 r 1 1 41-1 —_ A , \i /i ii 1 # - 11„, _ ,..--; k Kr3T.-- ,,- _t, ts D.. It ,t ... ',.÷,' 41— IF i o. A t�u3 ,F ' @ € S F ' 0 p x FM I o 63 ri10 m q. [ itio. 411 • 711, .A' ro 0/ IF :0 C "' t- .� 171 1 1 1F it ° f izi L ��ea SIG @An _ Y4 mom J k m CA 1,--muTmmor rniAl E • P tiMe, ill — g mg(�V®�d��1rie 0. ® (0 4 .:jirt j c g . ,,,, La LANDSCAPE PLAN RENTON CAMPUS . ; I nce mueller associatesRenton,Wa „a 1 Rwa architectsaia than.., ... ... o+oa•aos sue Qem a.w bl "e ...n.w.. e.t. BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE SIIn � �f� � D o s 5i-- -CST• CG�` - `dam • : ��:.. r • • AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: ' Y City of Renton Office of the City Clerk • Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave. So. Renton, Washington 98055 • RESTRICTIVE COVENANT REGARDING LID PARTICIPATION • This RESTRICTIVE COVENANT REGARDING LID PARTICIPATION (this "Covenant") is made by STRADA DA VALLE, a Washington general C'" , partnership ("Strada") , in favor of the CITY OF RENTON, a Washington municipal corporation (the "City") , . with respect to the Ofollowing facts. • Recitals . • • C A. Strada is the owner of the following-described property .1 lying within the City's corporate limits (the "Strada Parcel") : See Exhibit 1, attached. B. As. a provision of a Traffic Mitigation Agreement between the City and Strada dated March 31, 1994, Strada agreed to execute and deliver this Covenant to the City for recording in the records of King County, Washington. WHEREFORE, with respect to these facts, Strada hereby covenant's not to protest formation of . LID 1 as described in City. of Renton Ordinance 4283 . This covenant shall run with the land consisting of the Strada Parcel and shall be binding upon Strada and Strada's heirs, personal representatives, successors and . assigns with respect to the Strada Parcel. • STRADA DA VALLE, a Washington general partnership • GARY M. INO, Partner • • RESTRICTIVE COVENANT REGARDING LID PARTICIPATION--Page 1 OT6 :I1a DIO Stlafl073 9NIA 4!tl g.wa%SO LE9U-r6 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) } ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that GARY M. MERLINO is the person who appeared before me and acknowledged that he signed the instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as a partner of STRADA DA VALLE,. a Washington general partnership, to be the free and voluntary act of such partnership for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dgd, s gna-`ur &JO ( trv6 / r� Title p /7 S" My po ntment Expires :\aA2009W!3\tint.cov.v 1•- ta M Q 0J 0 cr RESTRICTIVE COVENANT REGARDING LID PARTICIPATION--Page 2 • EXHIBIT 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE "STRADA PARCEL" THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WESTERLY OF THE WEST MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 5, AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5376810, AND LYING EASTERLY OF THE EAST MARGIN OF THE EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY; EXCEPT THE NORTHERLY 100 FEET THEREOF. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. t C7 C ca t'r 0 yT S1) Biz s - g7-0 CITY OF RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE MEMORANDUM • DATE: May 17, 1994 TO: Neil Watts, Plan Review Supervisor FROM: Bonnie Walton SUBJECT: Recorded Restrictive Covenant - Strada Da Valle- #9404210637 The attached document(s) has been recorded with King County and copy is being returned to you. Please forward copies to parties of interest and retain a copy for your file. Per your memo of 4/15/94, you will also want to send a copy to David Halinen, Halinen Law Office, Bellevue. Thank you. . • Enclosures: (2) cc: Clint Morgan • •:1 ; ! OF REIN!ON CITY OF RENTON I }i9L; • MEMORANDUM = '' GLE-K'SOFFICE DATE: April 15, 1994 TO: Marilyn Petersen Att. Bonnie Walton FROM: Neil Watts /V2(,J SUBJECT: RESTRICTIVE COVENANT / STRADA DA VALLE Please process the above referenced covenant for recording with King County. As per your previous comments the following information is being provided. < l X ( r CONTACT PERSON THIS .OFFICE: Clinton Morgan \t' 7- CHARGE ACCOUNT FOR FILING: 007 / 532.030.49.00014 1 ?:01UJOP) APPLICATION NO. LUA-094-032.SA,ECF .wIJ l� (I)joy When the document has a recording number a copy of the recording needs to be sent to 1/ the following person or provide us with a copy to forward to: 5� David Halinen Halinen Law Office, P.S. Bellevue Place / Seafirst Building 10500 NE 8th Street, Suite 1900 Bellevue, WA 98004 Should you have any questions, please contact me or Clinton Morgan of this Office. 94CM102 G�'ve/i0 Qi („o ' � —MM / \ <d arpm, v z o p Qtl0!! A3lltlA 1Stl3 ,� JI i'+a aCe+ M-AaA yriJ,>fiM''yi �I''^'^auy yrJNrF9 .�•'^acn`i�r _ - - - �kN�+ew�.n'^A'i/7 — . .� }� 1 E CD i -,, 4-16.,,geir-4;41 t ®ia - - - : s 1 -—!� 1 1 _I 11111 1 1.y1aa1��f i1TiiT1:EMrF RIPm tou " ••IP rr ��,, %- Nn qyi Ar�.l ad Y -------------- r'*ad•1•1F r�rh.n�ry e.4 ila y cK.Y.+V-.rJI✓1-q/I41d.1 pqo On awe/0 a�sllnoa•A wvrHMal __ -�. at L'sy 46iid nr,tJ- -1 • - 3•ib'.f42 +deYdd 10-1 , I dJ-V .L—T-W r ,.,yi.n,..:,.°,.s��x w3ei.la.+ns awNb w.iw®s+...n.. � Fioie✓3 w.3e.,r,”•n.w3 e."r."'re 3s.e.,e•n.n a mr,.wi - �"n.s•..3.me s,.xu°a w,..,n,.w s,..H+w.v+.e o.rvm sw3 - - Kamm ns i 1 -' •• W AN'I' - - d`e W�LAiINI71A - -- 00904▪ 3 ' 1 ". .11t I T.._ ,..........."";7__ -=1 7_ ,... . .•-••.-, 0 - , „ LO-SIL:017..1 - Lk. _. --7'-'"- ' 1, f .X; J-•,,tr a ',4 . C11-121 011al .1) ,Ai ri . _, _ - . , illi --1,-- 3, ---- ,..7 .,..m , 1 .. 1 .., ,-,„,-....,\ ,----. -, • • • t.. •laaw.lar 97..7"" . ' ' bah0.1••4 il - lir „,,,,.. ....„.....• . ,...., "i III •-• v.aawj ..x q%I 1 it m . A A r-) - 11.12Mni I ri .7119ra 4 ..i Z ; 1 Z 1 L. av / o.orwzg,r i . E 0 ' . ! i I I—— • .. r L'• r ii ov wl z As -.[-A ovz 7,919 wJ in s*V010 Z.0 vcrici t g ' ......51.4.--.1.101.1 >. I I rdi 1 I ..... , 1111 _ . I I -6 ProcePPS,P A, ... [1111:---i---. ..- ___.---------------------11V-----r' ____.=____, C I 70010101..„, 9 ,,:, 6• SYNTI.0 1,10r AnWei O .----------------- -.- , r 7- in Pe c. ---------j7.173------'s — i 60 '3 f , 11 I 1. voca09,7.1 paal ltuna#Vat,.annc,LYAlal ,,I peallator.Ma i 9'4 I, . ..,---. A P- d . E reci ° !,1,. - ____,_ -.. e? ,....,,, , ,.--- ,,,.__....,..- 1111\ fli -,J-1.- '''. _ 0,.....-t,•i -4/.g.,,,A-F °, .k. V g .a• £ I I • . WI In° '''1 1 I: - ____0=/...•. ^ ____46,-tr*______4.-7.,,--_ - •d t -,_ ___ -....„ -111' _ ___„,k,t_____-_,1 1 1 ii / eg a R. . .i , -... .0 ..... ., :=•.,_ -- - - .... ..:•• . . . • mil ...,.._ ...,...alo.v.o.p•o ::, '5,73./Awaw I.‘ U 4151111M I . , .", ,..,....-2. '•C'0 2 2. ,,,, c, 111, LI1 ' a, I.1., .a,; g 2.9) , grit co.2 E ID I II"I 4Il '111111571Pir'" \ i i P 1 - I I 1 2 cg ...;I:•-.. ... sa 77510.1.7313c7 le .--1 1 1' L t aa .• .41. I o.oz pg-la I p'VOW/ I -- i 1 r 1 ., la(ne°4-: A r I ovx 7.-3-1g gg I ... FP647,0904 a Mu '' z sp•001.21 --.. r•-- • SaPaPa0 tra0f Pap,0 87 f- , 1 I .-- I ca•oZ 713-13',1'4 I £11"00191 I Cg -1 "--•s- I 1 iii:i ,e'lli — r's,----h------ 1 ,,,......-„0010000,... --------- g' k----------- ° 1,4 ___---------'---- - ____._ _— r----, _---------1- ;E• , _ • . . , . j • • NIB ia.1o = IIIII 1 • • ta) la 4.1,41 Of# IIIII, IIt/ Mill ill III I III ,�i III III me III • III III I.I ill • III frl ii ui ,.1 l : Ill IC I, 1 p III �,' III . gI HI III II ;:;II I'. U.-1 III • III Li III III III PII1 III II.1 it 1.1 i Ill ' III '1 illu III • obEla InJala>( 4,-(ip,.1 rya I k?.ai.I'(Oi.l &Me l-a, -U 8 &associates a....� IA architects ale la l(O;\vp.4 . .n..k.e i _ I -- 'I h I r s —. II i il — 1■ 1■ hilt' IIil, flitI. I• I iii 111 II I. iu1 l! 1■ ' i II I;i I■ TiiIi IIN ! 3� i1 • 11 3 V1 h 1 iOP III • 1111-M, r m-na4=nw4,o 2 I2G1-.11.0r-1 GAMlaay lance mueller ee d „ &associates {2�.1J'(O�I, \v/> 64, architects aie .... 1 I • IIOr • IIIII 11 MI J_ 1U1 1•1 . • III 4. IUI C Is Rif � en 1�1 iii • � ,1 ill IUUII I III III III 1.1 11111 �IlI I iii Li L d_ Il 1/l III 1: III1 =I I III MI II hi I 1II L!I m Jj ail 1m 'UI III III IN I . In 1u1 i+ul 1U1 dill II I: idII IIIII ` u111 !n I �11 111 51 iii ii ! N iii 1 ui11 I iii 1 w i'si u1� hI III ��Iy /IU ii, II I o 1�1 • ! \ III it III * I 1 3 111 11E1 IEI IUI 111 III 11�I 'f1�M iii 1�1 III M ni I III I la, 1 III , ill , ......, , . uMI Y! n.., OL-P i 4 3 Al at.0 I f JTo,J 664MI.1.16 lance mueller 8 & associate t r!\v0,7,-Iw Tat-i architects era 1 . . 1------1 . Os 1 ocaooppqr,,; ' ,_. M.T'511- ..-- . i 8 - • I NO,1 . ,.._-• . p4-tn1.O11e.r.I_.;:'r4)m,.4::.:.:l1-1i,.11.-,-a..E3 .--..:0 0,,„ml,,F=er-1011,,1b,.1,-g.—,,,'.-.---14-,:\%.1,t,.'.,-i';.406-.;,.i:',.0.A:.., i r1qi;_•liP4R,RiR-\i.;-.. a-0h.0--E-—Pq \a.. 1? ii -m iv,qf1fi1p T1ii0I B 1iq8 B 4t ii1-i100 t z0 PP I „ „ T 4ii f b h.0-1 1 i 1f3'i . 110, — •• i F. I •ft— (PF 111 IT ... . . . 0 ro i /11::0::•,'.,.-4• 12 .IPM11.3. .0.' 440 lifi 1419 to ... : CD o ID 1 5. .1. it : -..T ,,. i fp hc. i ll 0. 1 a -,,i ..:A iiirnimalik gite Fp ,.. el A iii. - ........... co to CII 1tst9.. vl .........0 th.i,10.1,1(:).J1.-- .. r 'AL Illi• t • fib S. 41) 113. 0:.: ilk .. :..... 31 7.0..h. Air 11 *-in .."',s, ep. •D -15 i it :'o 1) IP gi ;g• 71 v.,0 •Vi LI: ..._ 1 '5 — • ID 4 -1 t ... 7, ft 110-,1 liv .71 ti, ...i..301. 7 C4 As .---, AI?' ir ' • • , i RI Tel,, 6 =4 ... ah :.ii w ....':,16 10...gromwo ik : - () OD g; . ..:.,. ,Taamsok„..., . ... .. . ....... lia II -iiiiti . , EP LANDSCAPE PLAN RENTON CAMPUS . i lance Renton,Wa el architects aia .ta.6-1 „,. ,..„,„,.. —, I t if i .. IIIOoopqqqk p a 4 I s py O �:.,.._:•_=°sda�r. Fri r- rm �' Tpig11 $ 5ddd� Y � � P li m t ly ��v i" B r ii ill III Ig< 1, Fig.? • < r II! 9 l 2 #.1 € it a 1 4.• kR? r" g i• it iq ii •5 or r 0, 1k - II ... S m � T. yt aV j r eno (i) e Eli ., IIB p 11 �7�i S IL 62 m 8. ft 1i o w ' t iemeenelks'id /1111 i .I. e:. T :l® al -, li: - rn I O froi n.j,in11 •°tk Ro g Fa a Fr ,d •P 3 •1 A IIIct: Al c0 i1 1, tik �b, w. a d ) 8 —0 (1 tt 111 it, 0—mprisy • r •a lit eam \ •.�:oiftiS at4z., .-... ..-a.„.L: • ill CI9 . Lig0e z LANDSCAPE PLAN RENTON CAMPUS gee lance mueller d;w„ I ay associate¢ Renton,Wa 1301 4 Itl architects BIB ceecMetl 1 Prvc Lmr lv-n+��tt- e ev a eevcNe weep.90122•608 328 2083 tloce:t i ,v reNv(on de • MRY Li ' 1I3 LANCE MUELLEK LUE, fr PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON lance mLieller NIPY - 2 1991 asociates, architects RECEWED 1)1,:r4T. 'Jo • ;7.,P,,,"0 n DOD: ' Ci 3, •_• _ • . i1 or Cvrtr,-,-1 , 'all.„ 7 - I ,• , _ ' e t _ • • ,. • ", jdings F..1.; ,".gle star,: ; • , r.,.• dated 0-•,,,vnii.;).•1,-y 19'..)0 : . .0 and nia OU Lfl staff 1 • • . • s .f . r • s •. ] * , . . , ... • . "That ' • the . be • 'riat the the . • . „ . . . . • • • ,•• ,.•_ k • arcihitagt• IiHi 6 1 UJdb LHINt-t. IrlUt-LLt-N CLOb ", . • 11.-ince mueller & associates architects !lay on• 2 i• 1':• 6:• rc • ••:;!: .L • •j ••!,,0•.• •,• • • ." made , ;. , ;„- • ,•-• - , - s f •• • • • • - , • f ••,: •`' rite . net - _ ', " , T . for ••• , yVe ' k"•.L. • i.,•J-• 0, s of • - , base(11 . • r, • • - Qf tbe Planning, • the t ()wing - . *_ I "/ r, ; ' ! •-.1•1 ' C !!. . ": *e:,':.„t 1 ,"..1 • . • • ,• , . t',10;.!1 !., • ic—Fait a :‘-!f 0.60,h.E01 ZACr4E3aCJ5154 ty.g,Al) .—..ra; ustarar o'iantlynNok.g, -• "•. ,*..• 41,4srirxi rChi tecits August 5, 1991 City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Mr. Robert Arthur RE: Strada Da Valle Office Park - Declaration of Covenant for Proposed Southwest 27th Street Dear Mr. Arthur: Enclosed are two execution copies of the Declaration of Covenant regarding the proposed Southwest 27th Street interchange adjacent to the Strada Da Valle Office Park. Lawrence Warren, City Attorney for the City of Renton, has approved this Covenant as evidenced by his letter of August 1, 1991, a copy of which is attached. Please have Ms. Lynn Guttman execute the "copy" and return it to the undersigned as soon as possible. It is my understanding that execution of this Covenant satisfies all remaining concerns regarding the landscaping at the Strada Da Valle Office Park. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, STRAD DA VAL PARTN RS R ert . Hine , Jr. General Counsel RLH/tv cc: Gary M. Merlino Don J. Merlino 9125 TENTH AVENUE SOUTH ° SEAITLE,WASHINGTON 98108 ° 206/762-9125 ORIGINAL DECLARATION OF COVENANT THIS DECLARATION OF COVENANT is made this J day of August, 1991 by Strada Da Valle Partners, a Washington general partnership comprised solely of Gary M. Merlino and Donald J. Merlino (the "Merlinos") , with respect to the real property described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property") . A. The Merlinos, as Strada Da Valle Partners, are the Owners of the Property, which is located in King County, Washington; , B. The Merlinos have constructed a three building office park on the Property known as the Strada Da Valle Office Park (the "Office Park") ; C. As a condition to approval of the construction permit , application by for the Office Park, the Merlinos agree to allow the City of Renton or the State of Washington to approach them in the future regarding acquisition of a right-of-way necessary to construct the proposed Southwest 27th Street interchange abutting the south boundary of the Property; D. The Merlinos further agreed as a condition to construction permit approval to inform any subsequent purchasers of the Property of the public interest in eventually acquiring the necessary right-of-way for the proposed Southwest 27th Street. E. The Merlinos desire to set forth in the Declaration of Covenant the terms of their agreement with the City of Renton regarding a proposed Southwest 27th Street right-of-way. NOW THEREFORE, the Merlinos covenant as follows: 1. The Merlinos acknowledge, confirm and agree that the City of Renton or the State of Washington may approach them regarding the condemnation of certain land at the south end of the Property which is currently proposed as Southwest 27th Street. 2. All future purchasers of the Property are hereby on notice that the City. of Renton may approach them regarding the condemnation of the proposed future of Southwest 27th Street. 3 . 'The covenants contained herein shall attach to and run with the land and be binding upon all transferees of all or any part of the Property, their heirs, executors, administrators and assigns. r j IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Declaration of Covenant is made the . date first hereinabove written. S RADA DA VALLE PARTNER Gary M. M rlino APPROVED AND ACCEPTED: Lawrence J. Warren Lynn Guttman STATE- OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me, Ga7to me known to, be the �i desc ibed in and who executed the withiip aryl, foregoi g Anstrument as Y4kr-htGh of ,Syre&f'a. A 1�aelC. and acknowledged that they signed the sam as. their free and voluntary act and deed on behalf of said v , for the uses and purposes th rein mentioned. GIV N under_ my hand and official seal this day of 7 4) , 1991. 0.**v11NES,� �\ •••`� .c... 1ON • 4. tary Public in ana fort to of NOTARY ttA Wishington, residing at r • . _ . m r • : Z PUBLIC : 2 9 ) ......•' • .,-c®. rkA, CITX OF RENTON WiFF Office of the City Attorney Earl Clymer, Mayor Lawrence J. Warren. August 1, 1991 Mr. Robert L. Hines, Jr. General Counsel Strada Da Valle 9125 Tenth Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98108 Re: Strada Da Valle Office Park and Proposed Southwest 27th Street Dear Mr. Hines: The covenant as drafted is approved as to legal form. Very ,t ly yours, C7C6u P 'Lawrence J. Warren LJW:bjm Enc. cc: Mayor Jay Covington Don Erickson Lynn Guttman B. 1. 17. 67 Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton. Washington 9R057 - (20(1 ',SS-R(7R `' : CIS I OF RENTON 41, Office of the City Attorney q - Earl Clymer, Mayor Lawrence J. Warren. 5P%-05g 87 p1 cit 7 af1 �l j� R47- �l Ili�, 0 August 1, 1991 a � 42 997 y� Mr. Robert L. Hines, Jr. Y� ft General Counsel 41 Strada Da Valle 9125 Tenth Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98108 Re: Strada Da Valle Office Park and Proposed Southwest 27th Street Dear Mr. Hines: The covenant as drafted is approved as to legal form. Very truly yours, Lawrence J. Warren LJW:bjm Enc. cc: Mayor Jay Covington Don Erickson Lynn Guttman B. 1. 17 . 67 Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street -Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 DECLARATION OF COVENANT THIS DECLARATION OF COVENANT is made this day of August, 1991 by Strada Da Valle Partners, a Washington general Partnership comprised solely of Gary M. Merlino and Donald J. Merlino (the "Merlinos") , with respect to the real property described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property") . A. The Merlinos, as Strada Da Valle Partners, are the Owners of the Property, which is located in King County, Washington; B. The Merlinos have constructed a three building office park on the Property known as the Strada Da Valle Office Park (the "Office Park") ; C. As a condition to approval of the construction permit application by for the Office Park, the Merlinos agree to allow the City of Renton or the State of Washington to approach them in the future regarding acquisition of a right-of-way necessary to construct the proposed Southwest 27th Street interchange abutting the south boundary of the Property; D. The Merlinos further agreed as a condition to construction permit approval to inform any subsequent purchasers of the Property of the public interest in eventually acquiring the _ necessary right-of-way for the proposed Southwest 27th Street. E. The Merlinos desire to set forth in the Declaration of Covenant the terms of their agreement with the City of Renton regarding a proposed Southwest 27th Street right-of-way. NOW THEREFORE, the Merlinos covenant as follows: 1. The Merlinos acknowledge, confirm and agree that the City of Renton or the State of Washington may approach them regarding the condemnation of certain land at the south end of the Property which is currently proposed as Southwest 27th Street. 2 . All future purchasers of the Property are hereby on notice that the City of Renton may approach them regarding the condemnation of the proposed future of Southwest 27th Street. 3 . The covenants contained herein shall attach to and run with the land and be binding upon all transferees of all or any part of the Property, their heirs, executors, administrators and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Declaration of Covenant is made the . date first hereinabove written. STRADA DA VALLE PARTNERS Gary M. Merlino APPROVED AND ACCEPTED: Lawrence J. Warren Lynn Guttman STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )SS COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me, to me known to be the individual (s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument as of and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed on behalf of said , for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of , 1991. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at • stc- osig - L x- °x h Z r . ss SS ors, Pb '4 ..a-SA te.. •r � � "�`r r ...yz -i ., .. .. .t.•suw t7AZM8iHt".'vim .r�• .r July 29, 1991 Mr. Robert Arthur City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Wa 98055 RE: Strada Da Valle Office Park - Placement of Remaining Picnic Tables Dear Mr. Arthur: Pursuant to our telephone conversation earlier today this letter will confirm that the owners of the Strada Da Valle Office Park will have all remaining picnic tables in the southeastern corner of the site and two lunch tables between Buildings B & C, as diagrammed on the revised landscaping plans for the site, by August 31, 1991. If you have any questions concerning the substance of this letter, please call. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, STRAD DA VALLE PARTNERS Ro ert L. Hines, . General Counsel RLH/tv cc: Gary M. Merlino Don J. Merlino �3{? {1a''!'1( 11"I:N1'1:�()f''I'{{ • til'.\l'I'!.i . `\ Ltif i1�(;':( >\ '),;!i) • 2+x) 'O.! vl?; ► \ 7 ,. CITY F RENT ON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator • July 29, 1991 Robert L. Hines, Jr. General Counsel Strada da Valle Partners 9125 Tenth Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98108 SUBJECT: Covenants for Strada da Valle Requirements for Certificate of Final Occupancy SA 058-87;B-15654 2350, 2400, 2550 East Valley Road. Dear Mr. Hines: The revised landscape plan submitted by Heidi Vukonich for Strada da Valle dated July 24, 1991 has been accepted by the City. Strada da Valle must submit to the City for approval by the City Attorney a covenant to the City that Gary Merlino will inform subsequent purchaser(s) of the possible public interest in eventually acquiring necessary right-of- way for southwest 27th Street extension. This was agreed to, in form, by Mr. Merlino in a letter dated March 27, 1990 from David L. Halinen. A portion of the passive recreational facilities (tables, chairs and benches) , required - as part of SA 058-87 conditions of approval, are being relocated to the southeast corner of the facility as per the revised landscape plans. The relocation of these facilities will place them directly within the right-of-way of the possible 27th street extension. Relocating these required recreational amenities is being accomplished voluntarily by Strada da Valle. Strada da Valle shall therefore submit a covenant to the • City of Renton that the passive recreational facilities being positioned within the right-of-way setback of the possible 27th street extension shall be relocated entirely on , Strada da Valle property at the property owners expense 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Robert L. Hines, . July 29 , 1991 Page 2 at such time as the completion of the SW 27th Street extension is accomplished. This covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney and shall be placed on the property title through recording with King County. Plans for the project shall be submitted and approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department of the City of Renton prior to issuance of site preparation/building permits when it becomes apparent that these facilities must be relocated. Should you have further questions you may call me at 277- 6169 . rt L. AGLT, a e Inspe or Development Services cc: Ron Nelson, Building Official File/SA 058-87.. File/B-15654 File/LHISTVA j sw rM s 1.". '14 1111 Y' �` 4 tit. ' July 26, 1991 Mr. Robert Arthur City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Revised Landscaping Plan - Dumpster Placement Dear Mr. Arthur: Pursuant to our telephone conversation earlier today, the owners of the Strada Da Valle Office Park have determined that only one large garbage dumpster at the north end of the property will be necessary to contain all refuse generated by the Office Park. There will be garbage pick up each night which will then be delivered to the large dumpster at the north end of the site. If you have any questions concerning the information in this letter, please call. Very truly yours, STRADA D• VALLE PARTNERS Robert L. Hines, Jr. General Counsel RLH/tv cc: Gary M. Merlino Don J. Merlino O6 ail OF REN Oa RECEIVED JUL 3 9 1991 6U LD NG V ON 9125 TENTH AVENUE SOUTH ° SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98108 ° 206/762-9125 :J,.•l '..may, _ - :}.n,4 ,`� ,71 17, July 24, 1991 NO S Ala nhomin9 L661 Z inr Mr. Ron Nelson CISAili0a8 City of Renton NO1N3 JOI WO 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Strada da Valle Office Park - Landscaping Revisions Dear Mr. Nelson: Enclosed are revised landscape plans for the Strada da Valle Office Park dated July 16, 1991. These plans contain revisions to the plans originally submitted to the City of Renton for construction permit approval. However, the revisions reflect a higher standard of aesthetic appeal established for. this project by the owner which enhances the visual quality and user friendly nature of the site. Set forth below is a brief summary of the revisions made to the original landscaping plans. 1. Plant material throughout the site was substantially upgraded in quality and quantity. The plant pallet closely coincides with the original pallet, except that additional plant varieties were selected by the owner to broaden the year-round aesthetic appeal. 2 . The planting area at the north end of the site was revised to accommodate an existing drainage swell;'ditch for the City of Re bon which flows into a drainage area to the east of the site. 3 . The owner constructed a raised planter extending the entire width of the parking area between Buildings B & C in order to "break up" the parking area and visually reduce the size of the parking lot as seen from either building. 4. Pursuant to Condition No. 3 of the Determination of Non- significance, Application No. SA-058-87, the owner is required to provide on site a minimum of "7,500 sq. ft. of usable exterior recreation space for employees which could include a mixture of active and passive uses in one large space or a number of smaller 9125 TENTH AVENUE SOUTH ° SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98108 ° 206/762-9125 Letter to Mr. Ron Nelson July 24, 1991 Page 2 spaces. " The revised landscape plan provides for 7,540 sq. ft. of passive area only. In addition, the owner has provided 555 linear ft. of walking track, 640 linear ft. of running track and 6,930 sq. ft. of lawn area inside the oval shape running track. The passive areas include the courtyard between Buildings A & B, the handicapped priority area at the southeast corner of Building B, the park-like picnic area at the east end of the running track and seating areas at the west end of the running track. These areas will provide all occupants of the buildings easy access to passive areas for recreation, relaxation and lunch activities. Indeed, the owner has provided a walking path on the east side of the site to provide occupants of Building B pleasant and easy access to the walking/running track without any potential conflict with vehicle traffic. 5. The walking/running track configuration has been changed from an "hour-glass" shape to a traditional oval shape. This change produces a more user friendly route and adds an additional 180 lineal feet of track area. My client believes you will agree these changes significantly improve the visual characteristics of the project as well as the access to active and passive recreational opportunities on the site. These changes also conform to the conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner in the Determination of Non-significance. As you know, the owner is under intense pressure from a potential tenant (Boeing) to have occupancy of Building B by August 1, 1991. We are extremely impressed with the speed at which the City of Renton reviewed the tenant improvements for Building B, and hope that this effort will continue as we progress toward a final Certificate of Occupancy. Meanwhile, we are happy that the City of Renton and the Merlinos were able to complete such a high quality project in the City of Renton. If you have any questions concerning the information in this letter, the enclosed landscaping plan or any other matter, please call. Very truly yours, STRADA DA VALLE PARTNERS Robert L. Hines, Jr. General Counsel cc: Gary M. Merlino Don J. Merlino Heidi Vukonich Mr. Bob Arthur • 'Mr MAY 02 '91 39:37 LANCE MUELLER 2E15 328-0554 P.1 r— -XX TRANSMISSION SHEET DATE: 5-2F91 PLANNING DIVISION • CITY OF RENTON MAY - 2 1991 TO r 87 ) RECEiVED : ( iC 25, 70 : RH • _ _ _ _ • • _ , c1/es NUMBER OF 2.1\1' iS (COVER SHEET INCLUFD) DESCRI''', •-•• • SPECIAL INSTRUCT TONS: jaw 2:8V _rtetti 74047- Yelr) /12-' . vou DO NGT kECEIVE ALL PAGES INDICATED ABOVE, PLEASL CALL 206 325 253 iarrze usher & associates • architects 130 lakeside seattla weell . 98122 FAX ktOE 3.".,8 0554 • { • • 1.Iance mueller & associates . architects PLASs?NT-4G DIVISION December 10, 1990 OirY � DEC 1 4 1990 Mr. Donald K. Erickson P Chief Planner CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue Renton, WA 98055 Re: Strada da Valle Dear Mr. Erickson: I am writing this letter to bring immediate attention to the dire position that my client is now facing. Due to my client's decision to accept a more conservative number of parking spaces than what was initially submitted for in trying to secure a building permit, Anmarco is constantly turning away. potential tenants for small user inquiries. • Thus far, as you are aware, 1/200 is what is typically required and accepted throughout most of King County. While we understand and greatly appreciate the city of Renton's attempt to minimize ' ' the amount of traffic on the increasingly growing number of crowded highways, we ask that you give special consideration to the overwhelmingly negative affect that the lack of parking spaces is having on this small user. For your review, we have provided a site plan which shows one space per 200 s.f. of office area. Your immediate attention would be greatly appreciated as site grading is scheduled for the 17th of December, 1990. If you should have any questions, please feel free to give me a call at 325-2553. Sincerely, • LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS Dion Young DY:bc 130 lakeside•suite 250•seattle, washington 98122•206/325-2553•fax: (206) 328-0554 lance mueller ala, cal•senior associates: robert olschewsky,eileen furney associates:robert fadden, michael galbraith, richard harnish, robert wells a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by and under the supervision of registered architects CITY OF RENTON APR 261990 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: April 23, 1990 TO: Marilyn Petersen, City Clerk FROM: Ronald G. Nelson, Building Official /&/ SUBJECT: Letter of Credit No. S080668 Strada De Valle (SA-058-87 and ECF-053-87) Plan Review No. 6729 Enclosed please find for your files the original copy of the above referenced letter of credit received this date from U. S. Bank of Washington, National Association, in the amount of $180, 000. 00. Said letter of credit expires March 31, 1991. RGN:mjp RGN#5:Strata - (-add#4 1/11-1°."� . V 1 r lei.S. BANK CITY OF RENTON RE C E 1 .V ED APR 2 3 1990 EFFECTIVE DATE: APRIL 5, 1990 • LETTER OF CREDIT NO. : S080668 BUILDING DIVISION EXPIRATION DATE: MARCH 31, 1991 TO: FROM: CITY OF RENTON U.S. BANK OF WASHINGTON, FINANCE DIRECTOR NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 200 MILL. AVENUE SOUTH 1414 4TH AVENUE, 5TH FLOOR RENTON, WA 98055 SEATTLE, WA 98101 (206) 587-7049 DEAR CITY OF RENTON: WE (THE "BANK") HEREBY ESTABLISH, AT THE REQUEST AND FOR THE ACCOUNT OF ANMARCO, 9125 10TH AVENUE SOUTH, SEATTLE, WA 98108 (THE OWNER) , IN YOUR FAVOR THIS IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER S080668, IN THE AMOUNT OF ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY THOUSAND U.S. DOLLARS ($180, 000. 00) , TO INSURE PAYMENT OF TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEES FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS "STRADA DA VALLE" (SA-058-87 AND ECF 053-87) PURSUANT TO THE FINAL VALLEY TRAFFIC MITIGATION 'PROGRAM TO BE ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT SHALL BE EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY AND SHALL EXPIRE MARCH 31, 1991. WE HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AUTHORIZE YOU TO DRAW ON US BY DELIVERING TO US IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS HEREOF, YOUR SIGHT DRAFT OR DRAFTS, WITH EACH SUCH DRAFT ACCOMPANIED BY YOUR SIGNED AND DATED STATEMENT DETAILING THE REASON FOR THE DRAW- DOWN, IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT NOT EXCEEDING THE AMOUNT SHOWN ABOVE. MORE THAN ONE DRAFT MAY BE PRESENTED SO LONG AS THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF SUCH DRAFTS PRESENTED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH DOES NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT AVAILABLE HEREUNDER. EACH DRAFT AND CERTIFICATE PRESENTED HEREUNDER MUST BE DATED THE DATE OF PRESENTATION TO THE BANK. ANY DRAW-DOWN PRESENTED PRIOR TO 10: 00 A.M. WHICH IS IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT WILL BE HONORED BY OUR PAYMENT TO YOU OF THE DRAFT AMOUNT BY WIRE TRANSFER OF IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE FUNDS FOR THE ATTENTION OF THE PERSON SPECIFIED BY YOU IN SUCH DRAFT, NO LATER THAN 1: 00 P.M. ON THE BUSINESS DAY COINCIDENT WITH THE DATE OF PRESENTATION OF SUCH DRAFT. ANY SIGHT DRAFT SO PRESENTED. AFTER 10: 00 A.M. WILL BE HONORED NO LATER THAN 11': 00 A.M. ON THE BUSINESS DAY NEXT SUCCEEDING THE DATE OF PRESENTATION OF SUCH DRAFT. DRAWINGS MAY BE MADE UNDER THIS LETTER OF . CREDIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS HEREOF. MORE THAN. ONE DRAWING MAY BE MADE UNDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT AS DESCRIBED ABOVE. ** THIS PAGE 1 FORMS AN INTEGRAL PART OF CREDIT S080668 ** 16-7349 3/88 A U.S. Bancorp Company SANK .. ANY PRESENTATION UNDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT MUST BE MADE AS HEREIN SPECIFIED TO THE LETTER OF CREDIT OFFICE OF THE BANK. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS SUBJECT TO THE UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, PUBLICATION NO. 400 (THE "UNIFORM CUSTOMS") AS IN FORCE ON THE DATE OF ISSUANCE OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT. THIS LETTER OF , CREDIT SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A CONTRACT MADE UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON AND. SHALL, AS TO MATTERS NOT GOVERNED BY THE UNIFORM CUSTOMS, BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE,: INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON (THE "UCC") . IN THE EVENT OF A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE TERMS OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT AND EITHER OF THE UNIFORM CUSTOMS OR THE UCC, THE LETTER OF CREDIT SHALL CONTROL. AS BETWEEN THE UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND THE UCC, THE UNIFORM CUSTOMS SHALL CONTROL. ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY IN ARTICLE 45 OF THE UNIFORM CUSTOMS NOTWITHSTANDING, THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS INTENDED TO REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT UNTIL IT EXPIRES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ITS TERMS. FOR RENTON: FOR THE BANK: SIGNATURE: SIGNATURE: NAME: NAME: ALEMASH B. ILAHUN TITLE: TITLE: TELEPHONE: TELEPHONE: (206) 587 7053 ** THIS PAGE 2 FORMS AN INTEGRAL PART OF CREDIT S080668 ** 16-7349 3/88 A U.S. Bancorp Company ., OW CITY OF RENTON `� y Lawrence J. Warren, CityAttorney Y ,p Daniel Kellogg - Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean - Zanetta L. Fontes - Terence Lynch - Robert L. Sewell, Assistant City Attorneys April 11, 1990 TO: Donald K. Erickson, Principal Planner • FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE : Letter of Credit re AnMarCo/Strada da Valle ='`a Dear Don: The Letter of Credit submitted by AnMarCo for .the Strada da Valle improvements appears to me to be in appropriate legal form. However, because the Letter of Credit would have to be enforced by the Finance Department, i would suggest that you check with Dan Clements . If I can provide you with any further information please let me know. Lawrenc J. Warren LJW: as . cc : Mayor A8 . 54 : 84 . Post Office Box 626 - 100 S'2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 I, 114, A .. 1 � . 9125- 10th Avenue South 762-9125 Seattle,Washrngtor'il 98 141AR3 0 1990 1 II March 30, 1990 ik Ih Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP City of Renton Building and Zoning Dept. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Strada da Valle (AnMarco - Owner/Developer) Plan Check #6729 Dear Mr. Erickson: This letter is in response to the conditions to approval in the Report and Decision of the Site Plan Review Committee of the City of Renton dated March 23, 1990 (the "Report and Decision") regarding the above-referenced project. it Condition No. 1: The mitigation measures listed as subparagraphs 3b. through 3d. , page 2 of the Report and Decision and copied from the conditions to the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated, issued October 1, 1987, have been satisfied pursuant to the architectural drawings accompanying this letter; provided however, with respect to the implementation of more active recreational areas on the project, we propose placing one (1) or two (2) basketball goals inside the circular ends of the running track. Therefore, we assume Condition No. 1 of the Report and Decision is primarily directed at subparagraph 3a. , page 2 of the Report and Decision regarding traffic mitigation fees. In light of the fact that the final Valley Traffic Mitigation Program currently under consideration has yet to be adopted, and that when adopted, it will in fact impose on AnMarco a traffic mitigation fee less than the fee of $197. 00 per trip required by the Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated, we believe the // I • Letter to Don Erickson March 30, 1990 Page 2 payment of the traffic mitigation fee should not be payable until issuance of the Occupancy Permit. Indeed, mitigation measures will not be necessary until the project is occupied and traffic actually increases. Payment at this time would be a windfall for the City during the construction phase of the project. Therefore, payment as a condition to issuance of the Occupancy Permit appears to be the more equitable approach. Alternatively, if the City of Renton is insistent on security for payment of the mitigation fee prior to issuance of the Building Permit, AnMarco is willing to submit an irrevocable letter of credit from U.S. Bank of Washington in favor of the City in the amount of $180, 000.00. The attached copy of a letter to the Finance Director of the City of Renton confirms that U.S. Bank of Washington is committed to issuing this letter of credit. However, due to the internal procedures within U.S. Bank, the letter of credit will not be forthcoming until after the expiration of the appeal period for the Report and Decision. Nevertheless, this letter should be sufficient to enable the City to issue the Building Permit for Strada da Valle prior to issuance of the formal letter of credit. Condition No. 2: The revised architectural drawings accompanying this letter provide a bermed landscape strip along East Valley Road between the biofiltration swale and the sidewall, all of which Mr. Jerry Lind of your office indicated would be sufficient to satisfy this condition. Condition No. 3: The revised architectural drawings accompanying this letter provide a revised landscape plan which Mr. Jerry Lind indicated would satisfy this condition. Condition No. 4: Any signage constructed on the Strada da Valle property shall be substantially similar to the diagram attached to this letter. If signs are constructed, we will submit the appropriate sign permit application with the following proposal: 1. That a sign be placed at 3 entrances: the south entry, north entry and the middle entry off of East Valley Road, all as indicated in the revised architectural drawings accompanying this letter; 2. That each sign be approximately four feet (4 ' ) high and eight feet (8 ' ) wide and be a directional sign for building identification only; 3. That each sign compliment the visual character of the project, appear in proportion to the building and site to which they pertain, and be architecturally integrated with the design of the project. To this end, each sign it Letter to Don Erickson March 30, 1990 Page 3 will (i) be subtle and non-offensive in its character, is (ii) have lighting for night vision with the lights hidden by landscaping consistent with the landscaping planned for the project, and (iii) have raised lettering. The content of the sign has not yet been determined by AnMarco. Condition No. 5: The architectural drawings accompanying this letter provide for 238 parking spaces. Forty-nine (49) spaces have been placed in "reserve" and landscaped in conformity with the landscaping planned for the project. Please feel free to contact the undersigned if you have any questions concerning this letter. We would appreciate a response to this letter as soon as possible in order to prepare any additional documents consistent with this letter and the Report and Decision so that a Building Permit will be forthcoming at the expiration of the appeal period (April 6, 1990) . Best regards. Very truly yours, AnMarco Robert L. Hines, Jr. General Counsel RLH/lme cc: Mr. Gary M. Merlino Mr. Dion Young Mr. Lawrence J. Warren Mr. Clint Morgan Mr. Jerry Lind Mr. Jim Hanson li it C . r\iINU r lIN 1. I r: ILL NU . LUD J4U oDo.J r eu UJ , UU 1 • Ll r .UL EAST KING COUNTY CORPORATE BANKING U BANK 411 1 OBTH AVENUE N.e..SUITE 400 I::,:;: P.O.BOX 604E BELLEVUE.WASHINGTON 98004.304E C2053 S4O-E1683 ROBERT V.TYRRELL VIL't HRESICENT I,ry;i Rd March 29, 1990 Finance Director • City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: ANMARCO Standby Letter of Credit for Benefit of City of Renton •" Gentlemen: " This will confirm the commitment of U.S. Bank of Washington to grant ANMARCO a One Hundred Eighty Thousand and 00/100 ($180, 000. 00) Standby Letter of Credit for the benefit of City of Renton. • This letter is in process of completion; however, internal procedures do not allow its final issuance prior to April 6, 1990. Please accept this letter as out commitment pending final distribution of the Standard Standby Letter of Credit. Very truly y s, R 'e t V. Ty fell . Vice President • RVT:cjb U.S. Bank of Washington, National Association • . _ . . • • : . ....,. , . - e•-?: •A-----c:: . - . .-: . . 4„• . . - • ?, .',., :,, - • :..:.. •::•.,•_..": -.••„::.-7,.... •,_"-:,-),...4,-•:-..f...••;;;;,•,-;.--!?:.1:- -4.,•. *:1.5 ',,..".,'-;•';:•; '":•,'-,..,-,. .-7:-,..:,,.,,'. . ,. .•,.. . ,? . .. • . • . .• .. . . . ....., • . . --.•-, . • • ,.. - - • •,. --:....,,,k.i•,..•,•:.!::?..?•••:,•:.4",-1,......!',..:.„..1.':;:-., -,;;•0;',-4.,+.....:.:,--4-, .,:•-•;..1.i".:'.;:!:..:''.''. •......:-..'.....,:',.....,:., .. . . L.. • ' - ' -.• .. ,-, :...•!' '.: ' :. ' . ''. ' .i...;. ...,•••:.:'. ••• •-..! .1. '....,41',/-...i..1 ;:!'''..-..i:,Z..--. -...:'. ..:..‘ ...'-,''''''''..'''.', :, ' • • , r . . • • • • - . 11- • . ---t- I . • ' • 1.. - . . . . • • ., ..-, ... . : .' -. -i'.....,-;:.;1.-..,;;..z......t.,.....e. ;.f: r.,:''' ;,:.v fi::?4'..V-..4:i'',.,, ,.....r, -' 4":::41:::',7•• •-!':„;' :''':-.;ti::•i-. ,.-;•,':'. ' -',;' r, • ...,'i Z h II • • ••'• '-..' -..•'"; --F--":.•:-.--'i'•!•„7, ',,,:;',•-:,..::.- '.•••--?-••' •-,•• . ..4.:1,1 ,.. :•,,.•. -,:i•il•t,i.; ;,.,0,...;::,.. ,- . .,.. .....,------.::::7-- _•-•moimpiiiii77" 11 rj ! 1 ft- 1 - • - k''f -,4. 1$:‘,, ; ' --- ..,-,•;'-"":54 _zi „ik - , .. " 1,* "„: . r - ' - - .; , . . v -- . .31,•• % • ,I r .. 1 il .•:,. . '1 i'-::-! Vtl; ,i,if• .Y..:44 ,i• ., ,.• - ,$, It,. •'''' ./.. ' 1..: ---".1------• F— •'F" ' • .10 "--...." /Zit, — .., ' 17,,47,1.1. --- . .4-4,-,,-; —iv ... . , ff. • - ..„.........,,.. ,, ,,:.„_,,,: :.7';''.':-....,• ...'i,-:-../ .7.Z' •'.,....;',.-,..'7 •-,..).:4';; :..i..'.. •-•,,,..i.,,I..g.;,-1.: .2,',..,' .::.....-.'•-,if.'.' f, ...7" 4 'f kil'-,:.4"%•:c.".*:i.•-•4:,:, .`t4,1'f- ., r.,,_- : • - e•., , - -.. . .. i. i.i! ., _c. ..",.. ,..015,;. ....4...... • : ...7.. _,....._-....-.:...,A.:,...;.,‘,• .::. ..;•:•-_,L,... . ;_,...,7...'•"...,,....,.. .„ •..!,..' ,41 ..:.:-;•,;...."_..1. -,*11 . A , . • '* Z . : i V * 1 .. ' . •. I . .. . * - r 41.- • .-....,-. .... . . . .*".17*.* 7-47- W .rt." - '--. 1-•i .- — 'l Vivi :ilt. AkH i • ' . : . ": 1 : • • . . . : • ••., .' •. . .y• .• • ' . • . •_ • 'I t • !, If Rh. .:- s - '''' ' :: ' ' . • H --- _- Jr_ ._____ 'Tr( "1 MSAAI Ph! - -- • ....,ii• ' L.,itiVA Aorileelf--34- . ._ . . . • 1,-4 4.4 4440.1:rim.q..104 d 1.I .d 1 1..•erIla i. '9'---.i•fili--,1,A ..i: _ . . , . • } SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION March 23, 1990 APPLICANT: Lance Mueller & Associates LOCATION: Located on the east side of East Valley Highway, north of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 block of East Valley Road. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Revision to approved site plan to allow the construction of two single-story office buildings of 10, 000 sq. ft. and 17, 000 sq.ft. in Phase One and one single-story 32,120 sq. ft. office in Phase Two, on a 5. 62 acre site. The new site plan provides for two single- story office buildings of 9,200 square feet and 15,946 square feet and one single-story office building consisting of a total of 30,994 square feet. Project includes parking for 287 cars on site. This is an administrative review to revise the approved site plan. The following exhibits were entered into the record: • Exhibit No. 1 Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other • documentation pertinent to this request. . Exhibit No. 2 Site plan (received June 25, 1987) . Exhibit No. 3 Landscape plan (received June 25, 1987) . Exhibit No. 4 Building elevations (received June 25, 1987) plans. Exhibit No. 5 Determination of Non-significance (Sept. 9, 1987) . Exhibit No. 6 Environmental Review Committee Staff Report (August 12, 1987) . Exhibit No. 7. Revised plans (site, landscaping, and building elevations) dated January 29, 1990. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, and conducted on- site inspections, the following is entered into the record: Findings: 1. The applicant, Lance Mueller & Associates, has requested approval of a revised site plan for the Strada da Valle project proposed for construction by AnMarco. The revised site plan consists of two single-story office buildings of 9,200 square feet and 15,946 square feet and one single-story office building consisting of a total of 30,994 square feet for a revised total of 56, 140 square feet. The initial proposal was for 59, 120 square feet. The project includes parking for 287 cars on site and passive and active recreation space. 1 Site Plan Review Con; ' :.tee City of Renton • Report and Decision Page 2 2 . The applicant's file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43 .21C 1971 as amended) , a revised mitigated declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, the responsible official. The mitigated declaration of non- significance was based upon the fact that potentially adverse impacts associated with the project were felt to be mitigable by the City's Environmental Review Committee. The Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated, issued on October 1, 1987, included the following conditions: a. That the applicant pay $197. 00 per trip (or an amount in accordance with the final adopted Valley mitigation program) in traffic mitigation fees as assessment for the Valley Transportation Benefit District based upon an ITE standard of 17.7 trips per 1, 000 gross square feet of office area. Note to Applicant: This amount or portion thereof may be credited towards the eventual purchase of a 45 foot reservation of property along the southern property if this is determined to be needed in the future for roadway construction. b. That noise impacts to the proposed office buildings from SR 167 be mitigated with the use of construction materials and/or berming and landscaping in order to reduce the interior noise levels to no higher than more that 50 dBA. c. That the applicant provide on site a minimum of 7,500 sq. ft. of usable exterior recreation space for employees which could include a mixture of active and passive uses in one large space or a number of smaller spaces. Note to Applicant: That the applicant is advised to work with the Building and Zoning staff on the location of appropriate passive recreation areas for employees. Some of this space could appropriately be located at the south end of the site. d. In order to mitigate stormwater impacts, one oil/water separator should be provided on-site and if at some future time any of the site's stormwater runoff is discharged into the P-9 Channel a biofiltering swale shall be introduced to intercept the runoff before it enters the swale channel. 4. During 1989, the property owner's representative met with representatives of the Public Works and Community Development Departments to discuss changes in City policies affecting Condition No. 1 of the Determination. Representatives of the owner and City met to discuss changes in the Valley Transportation mitigation program as it impacted the improvements and mitigation fee originally required for the project. An agreement was reached with the assistance of the City Attorney that the condition needed to be modified. The condition now reads as follows: a. The applicant shall participate in the Valley Transportation Mitigation Program that will be embodied in the Renton Valley Transportation Policy when adopted. Site. Plan Review Coir.W';tee City of Renton • Report and Decision Page 3 The new condition replaces Condition No. 1 including the note regarding the reservation of property along the southern property. The Public Works Department has determined the reservation of this property is no longer necessary for future roadway construction. 5. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal and they have concurred to the revised plans. 6. The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park. This site is also zoned M- P, Manufacturing Park, which requires a unified theme, substantial setbacks and landscaping for all new development. 7. The site plan as presented provides sufficient parking to comply with the Parking and Loading Ordinance of the City of Renton. The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires a total of 238 parking stalls based upon total "gross" square footage (5/1000 sq. ft. ) , as defined by Section 4-14-2: Definitions: Gross Floor Area. Based upon an 85% efficiency rate with the office buildings, 238 parking stalls are required. The applicant has provided 287 parking spaces, 49 more than are required by code. Since the City is trying to encourage ride sharing and the use of public transportation, the additional proposed 49 parking stalls proposed should be eliminated and that land area incorporated into the landscaping. 8. The Site Plan Review Ordinance lists ten general criteria which are to be considered in evaluating the acceptability of a site plan application. These include: (a) Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies. The proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map designation of Manufacturing Park- Multiple Option. This is an area designated for a broad range of light industrial, service commercial and office uses. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives for industrial/office development as well as those specific policies established for such development in the Green River Valley. These policies call for development in such area to be compatible with adjacent uses; to be located and designed so that access is convenient to major transportation corridors; and designed with compatible design and landscape themes. The Green River Valley policies encourage a quality working environment for employees and high quality development. Further, the Urban Design Policies state: -"Ample landscaping should be provided throughout a developed site, including along property lines, to provide a pleasant environment, minimize the impact of development, and enhance the visual experience from adjacent properties, including hillsides. " and -"In addition, landscaped buffers should be established adjacent to public rights-of-way, between areas of incompatible land use, and along water channels and wildlife habitats. " Staff believe the development as proposed and/or as mitigated is an attractive development, designed in accord with City policies and regulations. Site Plan Review Con- :tee - City of Renton • Report and Decision Page 4 (b) Conformance with existing land use regulations; The subject proposal complies with the minimum lot area requirements of 35, 000 sq. ft. and yard setbacks on lots less than 300 feet which is 20% of the depth of the lot measured perpendicular to the street. Portions of lots deeper than 300 feet are generally required to have a 60 foot setback. The zone has no height limit nor is there a limit on site coverage. (c) Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The mitigation measures imposed by the ERC and as modified address this criterion. The site is isolated and does not share a common property line: with other private properties, except on the south. The landscaping plan, as mitigated and the materials and overall building design is attractive and interesting and will be a "good neighbor" development for future uses on nearby properties in the area. (d) Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The subject proposal will be designed to minimize adverse impacts to the subject site. Mitigation measures imposed by the ERC as well as design refinements recommended in this report will minimize any significant adverse impacts this development may have. Staff believe that the applicant could provide more extensive landscaping, including more trees at the rear of the proposed buildings to act as a landscape buffer between the proposed buildings and the SR-167 right-of- way. The applicant should revise the landscaping plan to reflect additional coniferous trees in this area, i.e. , Pine and Fir species. In addition, the landscaping plan should show additional groundcover between Buildings "A" and "B" ; provide an 18 to 24 inch berm between the sidewalk and the biofiltration swale with trees in the center of the berm and not by the edge of the swale. It is suggested that water tolerant species of trees be used in place of the proposed oak trees i.e. Red Maple. The trees should be spaced approximately 35-40 feet on center. Since the Valley Plan policies state the "provision of recreational opportunities should be an integral part of development in the Valley" and that "firms with large numbers of employees should develop outdoor recreation facilities", Staff are recommending that pursuant to the ERC recommendation, the applicant provide a minimum of 7,500 sq. ft. of usable recreational space on site for employees. This space should include some active space such as a basketball half, or practice court, and passive areas with benches and tables, as well as good solar exposure and noise protection. The applicant's revisions have included and enhancement of the courtyard areas between the buildings which provide pleasant passive outside areas for future employees of the complex. The original active recreation area appears to be more useful than the barbell shaped running track. The intent of the applicant was to provide active recreation which lend itself to use by both men and women employed at the Site Plan Review Com ;tee City of Renton • Report and Decision Page 5 complex. However, the running track may be disused in time due to the monotony of the track, particularly in light of the trail system which will eventually be developed in the Valley. Therefore, the applicant should use the original recreation proposal and include some outside picnic tables and seating in this area. (e) Conservation of area-wide property values; The subject proposal is expected to be of sufficient quality that it will enhance property values in the immediate area. Design elements such as the sloped metal roofs on the buildings will make them look less industrial in character and are consistent with the campus like tone the M-P zoning is trying to achieve. (f) Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; On-site vehicle and pedestrian circulation is good. While the design of the project does not lend itself to a total separation between vehicles and pedestrians, it appears that the applicant is providing special treatment to walkway areas which cross vehicle paths. Pedestrian crossings should be delineated with decorative pavers or special painted stripping. (g) Provision of adequate light and air; Under existing conditions, there should be adequate light and air exposure to this development. (h) Mitigation of noise, odors, and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The subject proposal is not anticipated to create any unhealthy conditions itself. As noted above, noise from SR-167 provides a constant level of background noise. The ERC anticipated this and required that interior noise levels measured at the window line not exceed 50 dBA. (i) Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Development of the office complex is not expected to create a burden on public services and facilities. (j ) Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The three one-story buildings with flat roofs should not have a debilitating effect on the surrounding manufacturing park. With the enhanced landscaping, pedestrian pathways, and recreational amenities that are recommended or have been required by the ERC, this project should enhance property values in the area. Conclusions: 1. The subject proposal is a development consistent with policies, specifications, and codes of the City of Renton. 2 . Specific issues raised by various City departments and focus on: a. Traffic impact mitigation; b. Adequacy of user open space and recreational facilities; c. Pedestrian circulation and safety; and d. Surface water runoff and its treatment. Site Plan Review Con; . .:tee City of Renton . , Report and Decision Page 7 TRANSMITTED THIS 23rd day of March, 1990 to the parties of record: David L. Halinen Attorney At Law Suite 1000, Plaza Center Building 10900 Northeast Eighth Street Bellevue, WA. 98004 Dion Young Lance Mueller & Associates/Architects 130 Lakeside, Suite 250 Seattle, WA. 98122 Anita West Gary Merlino Construction Company 9125 - 10th Avenue South Seattle, WA.98108 TRANSMITTED THIS 23rd day of March, 1990, to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Nancy Matthews Lynn Guttmann,Public Works Director Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Ronald Nelson, Building Official Members, Renton Planning Commission Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before 5: 00 P.M. April 6, 1990. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available prior to the meeting date of March 23, 1990, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of the decision, which is April 6, 1990. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011(B) (1) , which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on April 6, 1990. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-markers in the land use process for site plan approvals include: (1) the Public Works Director, (2) Community Development Director, (4) Planning Manager, (5) Building Official, (6) Hearing Examiner, and (7) members of the City Council. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Site Plan Review Com, :tee City of Renton Deport and Decision Page 6 3 . The applicant has agreed to the mitigation measures, as modified, imposed by the Environmental Review Committee. 4. The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park as well as the present zoning classification of Manufacturing Park (M-P) . 5. The subject proposal generally complies or could be made to comply with the general Site Plan Review Criteria contained in Section 4-738 (D) l. 6. There has been no public opposition raised by neighboring property owners about the subject proposal which is generally believed to enhance property values in the area. 7. The development as proposed will not place a burden on public services, provides an attractive development which will complement future uses, and as mitigated, complies with the policies and regulations of the City of Renton. Therefore, the development should be approved. Decision: The revised site plan, File No. SA-058-87, is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant comply with the mitigation measures of the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated, as modified, issued for the development. ; 2 . The applicant shall provide a bermed landscape strip along East Valley Road between the biofiltration swale and the sidewalk to help screen parked cars in the front of the building as well as reduce noise intrusion from this arterial; 3 . The applicant shall provide a revised landscape plan showing the appropriate number, size, species and size of all shrubs and trees as follows: trees within the bermed area adjacent to East Valley Road which are a water tolerant species such as the Red Maple and spaced approximately 35 - 40 feet on center; additional coniferous trees along the east property line adjacent to SR 167 (Pine and Fir species) ; and provide additional ground cover with trees and shrubbery east of Buildings "A" and "B" . This plan shall be to the satisfaction of the City's Community Development Department; 4. Exterior signage shall be designed to architecturally integrate with the proposed development rather than appear as an after thought and shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. ; and 5. The applicant shall provide parking for a maximum of 238 vehicles and turning the space proposed for an additional 42 parking stalls, into landscaping. Additional required parking, if allowed, may be placed into a landscaping or open space reserve upon application to and approved by the Community Development Department. For the purpose of these decisions, the term "should" and "shall" are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" is considered discretionary. ORDERED THIS 23nd day of March, DON . ERIC ON, AICP For The Site Plan Review Committee ,'4ctiaa Tema© - TO: ‘16-if PLEASE CALL FROM: OR YOUR I NFORMAT I ON _ ri FOR ACT DATE: TIME: -3d ❑ FOR APPROVAL ,,--� 0 FOR SIGNATURE RE: G� � ��' 0 YOUR RECOMMENDATION ❑ PER OUR CONVERSATION PHONE # : 0 PER YOUR REQUEST ❑ READ AND RETURN 0 READ AND ROUTE TO FILES COMMENTS : q ATTACH MATERIAL & RETURN ❑ FORWARD TO CITY OF RENTON Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Daniel Kellog g - Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean - Zanetta L. Fontes - Terence Lynch - Robert L. Sewell, Assistant City Attorneys Cf Y OF Rerropa RE " "D March 28, 1990 MAR 2 9 7990 COMM DEVELOPMENT €keP R7k;EMf TO: Don Erickson, Principal Planner Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director Lee Haro, Development Program Coordinator - - - ---- - - Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director , FROM: Anne Santos, Administrative Assistant RE: Merlino Property_ Dear Folks : For your information I am enclosing a copy of a letter Larry received this morning from David Halinen with respect to the Merlino property. Anne Santos A8 .54 : 38 . • Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 HALINEN & ASSOCIATES Attorneys at Law DAVID L.HALINEN,P.E. Bellevue Place,Suite 376 (206)454-8272 RHYS A.STERLING,P.E. 800 Bellevue Way NE FAX(206)646-2851 W.THEODORE VANDER WEL Bellevue,Washington 98004 t._.�11 1° 1.�A II It •, March 27, 1990 MAR 28 1990 ' .J VIA TELECOPIER AND REGULAR MAIL Lawrence J. Warren, Esq. Renton City Attorney P.O. Box 626 100 South Second Street Renton, Washington 98057 RE: Merlino Property at East Valley. Highway and S.W. 27th Street (Strada da Valle) Dear Mr. Warren: I finally received a copy of your letter to me dated March 9, 1990 last Wednesday, March 21, 1990. The letter generally comports with the conclusions reached during our meeting with Lynn Guttmann and John Adamson. Just two minor clarifications are in order. First, as to my client's intention to construct improvements within the previously requested 45-foot wide reservation (for proposed future S.W. 27th Street abutting the south boundary of the Merlino property) , in addition to the installation of a running track, my client intends to install a storm water detention system and landscape improvements within the 45-foot wide strip. The ability to install a detention system and the landscape improvements within the strip were "passive" improvements that I insisted upon during our meeting with Ms. Guttmann and Mr. Adamson and the proposed installation of such improvements was acceptable to all present at the meeting. Second, I do not recall discussing that my client would inform any subsequent purchaser of the (f; possible public interest in eventually acquiring necessary right- of-way for Southwest 27th Street. However, after discussing this with Mr. Gary Merlino, he has assured me that such disclosure will be made to a subsequent purchaser if and when the property is tl eventually sold. With these two points of clarifications, I will presume that the issue of the S.W. 27th Street right-of-way reservation is closed. Should you have any other thoughts in regard to the two points of clarification set forth above, please let me know. Lawrence J. Warren, Esq. Renton City Attorney March 27, 1990 Page 2 Sincerely, HALINEN & ASSOCIATES • • David L. Halinen DLH:cac cc: Mr. Gary Merlino Rob Hines, Esq. P.S. If you are not already aware, please be advised that the Merlinos ' new in-house counsel, Mr. Rob Hines, will be handling the arrangements for meeting the traffic impact mitigation fee requirements for this project. I have explained to Mr. Hines your willingness to accept an irrevocable letter of credit or set aside account to secure payment of the fee and I have also explained that you expect the Renton City Council to shortly pass a new traffic impact mitigation program for the Valley that will both reduce the current up-front fee for this project and add an L.I.D. component. By copy of this letter, I am forwarding to Mr. Hines a copy of your memorandum to me dated March 15, 1990 along with copies of the attachments. DLH lance mueller & associates architects PLANNING DIVISION cr►Y OF RENTON March 21 , 1990 MAR 2 1 /990 h'EMr. Jerry Lind t� QvE� CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPT. 200 Mill Avenue So. Renton, Washington 98055 Re: STRADA da VALLE PLAN CHECK 6729 Dear Jerry This letter is in response to your comments dated January 23, 1990. 4. Letter dated 12/20/89 from Towne, Richards and Chaudiere, Inc. summarized the noise measurements. Attached you should find pages taken from American Graphic Standards as well as test results for the 3200 series window wall system all of which will be exposed to SR167 at west side of buildings. Taking Lmax, the worst case condition of 75, minus 45 the STC rating of 6" concrete (these buildings will have a 7" thick concrete wall) you attain an Lmax of 75 - 46 = 29 DB. Using the same formula for the window system with an STC per ASTM E413 - 73 = 30, subtracting the 30 from the Lmax of 75, you attain an Lmax of 75 - 30 = 45. Taking the average of the two (29 and 45) you arrive at an Lmax or STC of 37, which is below the recommended 50 DB that you're requesting. Please keep in mind that this does not take into consideration that our concrete wall will be 1" thicker with _ a drywall system filled with insulation. 5. A detail of the required landscape berm has been provided per sheet A-1 . 6. Signage will be designed at a later date. Details will be provided for your approval. 8. Red Maple will be used in place of the Oak trees. 9. Compact parking stalls are 8-1/2' per sheet A-1 . 130 lakeside • suite 250 • seattle,washington 98122 • 2O8/325-2553 • fax:[2013]328-0554 kenos mueler ais,cal • senior associates:robes obehewsky.eleen furney associates:robsrt fodder:,michael gsibreith,richard Flemish,robert wells a weshingto,,corporation furnishing arcldteoturel services by and under the.uperviabn of registered architects { lance mueller associates architects March 21 , 1990 Mr. Jerry Lind CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPT. Page Two If you should have any further questions, please contact me as soon as possible. Sincerely, LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS Dion Young DY:nk enels. • 130 lakeside • suite 250 • Seattle,waehington 98122 • B0e/325-2553 • fax:[2013]328-0534 lone mueller els,eel • senior associates:robert alsch.wsky,elieen furney sesoolates:robert fsddsn,micheei ge6raith,r chard Famish,robert wells s'washington corporation furnishing architectural services by and under the eupsrvWon of registered architects Towne,Richards 8 -:haudiere,Inc. Consultants in Sound an.., .ibration 4 � RECt. ' Vty December 20, 1989 DEC 11989 ►ANCE MUD t ER & ASSOC.. Mr. Dion Young Lance Mueller Architects 130 Lakeside PLANNINGDIVISION CITY OF RENTON Seattle, WA 98122 MAR211990 Re: Noise Measurements Strada daValle kD Dear Dion: This letter is a report of noise measurements made during the morning rush hour on SR-167 (East Valley Freeway) just south of 1-405. The purpose of the measurements was to document existing noise levels from traffic on SR-167 as they would impact three office buildings proposed for the site. The site extends from 23rd Street on the north end to 27th Street on the south end, and is located between the East Valley Road and SR-167. The exact noise measurement location was at the middle of the site (north-south direction) at the edge of a drainage ditch that runs between SR-167 and the subject property. A "FOR SALE" sign was lying on the ground at the exact location. The distance from the measurement location to the guard rail along the west side of SR-167 was 52 feet, and 80 feet to the jersey barrier running along the median between the north and south traffic lanes. The noise measurements were made using a Larson-Davis type 800B integrating sound level meter. The measurements were made in five minute increments between 7:38 a.m. and 8:35 a.m. At the 105 NE 56th Street Seattle,Washington 98105 206/523-3350 ( \ FAX 206/523-0174 Mr. Dion Young December 20, 1989 Page Two beginning of this time period northbound traffic was quite slow, but speeded up to normal highway speeds towards the end of the measurement session. The measured levels were adjusted for a distance of 130 feet from buildings A and B to median of SR-167, and 185 feet for building - . C. The results of the measurements are as follows: Summary of Noise Measurements Location L,_geMAX Buildings A & B - (130 ft. from Median) 70 75 Building C (185 ft. from Median) 68 72 The Leg noise descriptor is the equivalent sound level, an energy average of the fluctuating sound as measured. The Lmax is the highest level that occurred during each five minute increment for the entire 1 hour measurement session. 'Thyme, Richards& Chaudiere, Inc. Consultants in Sound and Vibration Mr. Dion Young December 20, 1989 Page Three If you have any questions regarding these measurements or the results, please give us a call. • Sincerely yours, TOWNE, RICHARDS & CHAUDIERE, INC. Roy L. ichards Vice President • jb • • • • • Tbwne, Richards& Chaudiere, Inc. Consultants in Sound and Vibration . • wv — • _ ,-y_ ' 4 I _ • '.',.'C'l''''.-.• ' ..6' - -- --- ---- • .- OCT- 20 ' BR 15 : 58 , PRGE . 30 1 yli/i/A gen4,,t, /#,,,,,, ,i,oitur: r t, 7-/ 0 (Pi.zil . • , . " - • .- . . .:-- , , OCT 2 3 1989 -.) - t) ! ,J , 7.) , il ,',,1 . , , , -. . • :. , ij, 6 IL:ii 0 . .., -- , " ,..%.. ' .. .! .:...-- .-. ..';.".. , ..... : , •- •- .. . :. ,.. _. . .. _ ... - . . _ • - ;. •-. . :. . . '• ,-.• ., , !,• ,_:._.. ,.. J.-. - 5., _,': . ..1 : ' . . 1,.• . ..., . . . .• ,--- . ,. . , . . _-.. " . - . -. ., ... .. '..' 1-• ,,- • . ... ._ __,, _ ---- -- ... - .:_-. • -_'''' _:'. •-•:':1-7 , . . . 1.'1; .1_,'',,'- _ -. . ••• ..- . • ,, _ _ --- .. -_-_-_-...--- , '' " ' . • , , .- • , • •• ,. . , • _ _ ,-„-, , i' . ,• ,_ PST , .. , , _ , . . _. .. ____. ! . .. . . , - - ' -- • - ---- _.. . ..... - . : .-"':-... ..'..,.- : . '.. .,,...::11•. :,:.., .,. .•-' ., _ ____ ..._- --- - -- -- _._ • --- - .._ _._ . -- -- • _ 71F.,..1"., •.:1',..; :lir_,.1: . ' ,.: ..'..'.;,1):/.1 i.,' :,-! (.-:: '.121.-T..11:4 ]:.-::,:.:I,',6',, PLEASE CALL S..7,2ID'Pli OR IRIA CZ'.Dit. LT 4 Ep,..,--,9 2 7 7., ...-,.: / ./ OCT 20- ' 89 15: 59 .---, PAGE . 002 ,,,. • . HALINEN &t ASSOCIATES Attorneys at Law _ . . __ _ ... . _. .. ____ C)AVID L.HALINEN,P.E. Rellevue Place,Suite 376 (206)454-8272 RHYS A.STERLING,P.E, .'.:Jin !,',.',.1:-..v1,1e7hviff.:. FAX(W6)646-2851 W.THEODORE VANDER WEI. 6 .11:-., - :l' ! ..,,L,,lick%.!„-":. • • 1 .! ._Ii.':1:, T_I'.., _ :-.:i.4i'i '...:7,--,...-:: .:i::. -_:''.. .=:';r .7 a --1,,,c.-.7":•i --•',_f.,,' • 2- '. -, ' '— . ..?.,, •:_..,'. r ...:. .:. . -•••= 7 :' ::: ., 1':-.:"1.:.., , ,,-71-..,-, On behalf ._•': -,,,:_:, -"i ., -,-i',.:., ,',,,-.42,-i,:-.J.,:!,:. .,-. 1:-..:-.,.]:-.-.7,.- :..-. -. c._;•:2 ,,,% h,,,. :.-,:.,:".:,-1 ,,i-, :1):: , -,:f the site .:,''',-,- ...7 :'2C7(..'..,C-_.',--'r: . A ,:z•% L.A,:.,, ';'...\-.[:-",f, '- z• 73,27::.t. 'L,;'...F, ..::_':.-..:-.,...... s.,y '.;.'- n,:.-..: ,...). ;*2..,. .-.,_:...;.'2.is, pe.r.Ait - .-,..,-7,-.,..-._ .t_:.: .-..•-...i-,,,:-. if rz..7. "....,.'/.: j.,A •..-",. ..;-;., ,, ,1:!.1.-.:.-:7:.•."J, -', L'il ..: y.--,:::t.)i._'.':'-,--. .,:',7..? IttCt and •, .."'..,Cj,1.. ,7,,, ,, );., to the .,. : . ..,, —LZS lined •-_,_;..-_ ,:: 1. _ ...,,:. 1 ,-- -., ,,,,,,..,-.-:J. - ',.',_:.2:. %...L.:-..„ ;..„.,jr.-:..,...-.... . . .1-7:2 ;11 plans , I 7.1'.1.:,. YI-2.-'''L. 1-7.7'7' "1:-.... :rhj.-----. l'.','''.--':-....:-. !-:110:flq with : _. .-1 -: to ,-,,..1:•:::: :::-..I.::(::: -i--:,:2.•: rf.,Y,..._,':::..7__:,...i.-- .,-.:_._ja...., ;_sin(:, :T7...T.-1-13 .1-,,-', .::J .,.:1.-,/:,- 7...1-...- ''''alley Road •-_: : :-.,..,..:.-7,,,. •-•'; '.,-..- , ,-,...:', - tr,A.,, , . , _ -.?... 2.-„-:„ , 'T..:-., .7, -.-..-•,-.-,u.... ,-,.-:.:=; 7uring ,...,17.1.11-:. rranted. ••••,--•; :•;:.: .-:- .-•.•",.:_•••-,f;••••.: ).:..,:;..•::),z.•.-y...-.•!:.....\• :,-,',2,,,,,.:.,-.. _ ,2.1L•f,...'1. ••(:,... .-,,, c:-..•••,-.: ,-,... t ...-) year I ,-.---...:12.11...:r•if.)--1 ,),,..-. ,- 1,..1,.„1;:. .1.:: ,:.., j....:,.---: i 0 . -:•._ ''..%."!C:_•;.• 1 .-.1i...; y,..i...,. f•or your _-:•-_,T.,:• `,..w.-"...- •:.-i,-':.1_,:,:, : ' ',..; "..7..,?... .,,,-•.:,..i• 7; •. '.'.- ,-„. !:;',',.•S 0 ..'...'-,t,TI.,::':. , . ' .." . .• ' - . . , .' 1 ...,.. !!,,....10 , . ., . !! DLN:c. 7.- cc: EL:, Gr.v..-.,:y D.- Kr4,..I.-LL.tv,".7. • .''' . .. -. ,,. • ,:,-1:.'''. „., ..„ . „,,. ,.. ** TOTAL PAGE . 002 WESTERN ELEOTRO - ACO ISTIC LABORATORY, INC. 1711 SIXTEENTH STREET • SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90404 • (213 9)a9268 • 450.1733 29 August 1984 PAUL S.VENEKLASEN / Director REPORT SOUND TRANSMISSION LOSS TEST NO. 84-115 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF F1ENTON mAR 2 1 1990 CLIENT: International Aluminum Corp. RECEIVED TEST DATE: 12 July 1984 • INTRODUCTION The methods and procedures used for this test conform to the provisions and requirements of ASTM Procedure E90-81, Standard Recommended Practice for Laboratory Measurements of Airborne Sound Transmission Loss of Building Partitions. Details of the procedure will be furnished upon request. DESCRIPTION OF TEST SPECIMEN The specimen tested was an International Aluminum Corp. curtain wall window known as the 3200 Series. The frame dimensions are 13'-9 7/8" long and 8'-9 3/4" high. This rectangular frame is subdivided into six small rectangular spaces by various vertical and horizontal extrusion members. There are four vertical extrusions, CW-351, that are 8'-9 3/4" long. The horizontal members are also CW-351's, but are only 4'-4 9/32" long and are attached between the four vertical ones with AC-352, shear blocks. A total of nine horizontal pieces are required, three for the top, three for the mid-point center line and three for the bottom. They are screwed on together with a 40 degree horizontal clip, HC-3S2, at the intersecting points. All interior gasket riglets are lined with a type NP-520soft sponge neoprene gasket. Six pieces of 1" insulated glass, 50-1/2" x 53-5/16", are positioned within the frame members. Each glass required two neoprene sitting blocks, - SB-110, at their bottom edge to separate them from touching the extrusion. These blocks are composed of a 90-Durometer neoprene rubber. Once the lites are positioned, they are fastened and secured with pressure bars. The outer perimeter pressure bars (8) are types CW-374, and the inside standard bars (5) are type CW-358. In the center section of the pressure bars there is an 80-Durometer vinyl spacer thereto-break separating the bar from the, frame mullions. The gasket riglets on the pressure bars are laced with 0-330, which is an 80-Durometer E.P.D.M. , gasket. RESEARCH CONSULTING CALIBRATION INSTRUMENTATION .._.,—.... ... , . 1 , . . ,WESTERN ELECTRO-ACOUSTIC LABORATORY, INC. Report No. TL 84-115 Lo) 70 1." '0 it ? ? u 4t ty • kg '? tr 3/ vus, v1, 31_ ef 41 ,I I A T.' -1 a..m... 1. 1.... I ar 60 — , I . 1 ) , , 1: 50 . ' . „ . i I , - .-' ..' _. --.....-.6.1 • 4 __ A . 4 4 ;1 I „8 4- , .., . .--.--,, , . , r , .., 0 40 . MI r . - .. . i • Z . 4 ,.../ If .• , 4 M.--4,....... ....4 LI 14-)t-IC SIC ic .. , -;... L 4. - 1 30 , , , , - - , 5 , ... - ... . ih‘ CI K' • ; ; • , ....;;),,... II .., 1 20 r _ - --. ..„ -, , IIIIII .., Aft, AO ... 1 • I •••• p. ; . P , , 4. M A • . I • , a ' - • A OP 4. t ) , —40—r-74o,-1}-4$7,0-200-2s-s•-• •• ., -41.- - 1 11.11#4.6-too-20-v‘-.0.-sio......0_1804 NIT 1 2 1 f T } I , i 10D 1000 1 0 000 .: FREQUENCY IN CYCLES PER SECOND : . '.., OCT BM fo 225 160 200 250 315 400 500 .630 80_,.....2... ...„_0 1 __ __ _,..............000 600 2000 2500 3150 4000 00 22 18 21 21 •23 27 29 30 32 32 32 31 30 31 35 38 35 . .._ , . . 1 •-, 4 f TL. ... -SIC. er ASTM E413-73 I., 30 • Test Wall Size: 123,1F14 . Temperature: 74* F o Relative Humidity: 54% Test Date: 12 August 1984 Test Engineer: Stephen A. Martin • .---, ))' Appr. , --•-ai de(iver • • te!• i IfV`. . 1 =U l..•iU IV.U J r1LUFIII`IUI I L-1 I Cl- INU.OK.I -10(JOJG 4-{ repo , • f The pressure bars are torqued to 40-50 in./lbs. to insure sealing all along Ls, the edge of the glass. All horizontal bars are equipped with weepholes for . the water seepage. Once all the panes have been mounted and secured, the vertical and horizontal face caps, CW-356, are snapped over the bars. The entire system is firmly fixed in place by putting shims between the opening and the frame, and then attaching the aluminum frame to the structure with screws. A backer rod, (spongy material) is also inserted to absorb any movement. The entire Joint formed between the perimeterp frame and the test facility opening was sealed with a silicone caulk. RESULTS OF THE MEASUREMENTS The sound transmission loss values at 17 one-third octave bands are tabulated on the attached sheet. The Sound Transmission Class rating determined in accordance with the procedure was STC-30. Respectfully submitted, Approved: Western Electro•Acoustic Laboratory, Inc. 10 os . •r e.4116 S �p a ar n a" .� • Sound Transmission Loss Test No. 84-115 Page 2 my ; Ouuno 1 ldllsllllbSlon Loss; rdruons ano VVdIIs OUND TRANSMISSION LOSS—WALLS AND PARTITIONS OF MASONRY AND CONCRETE ASE CONSTRUCTION WEIGHT (Ib./ft.2) STC RATING' PLANS (NO SCALE) 4" LIGHTWEIGHT • 20 36 ' 4" DENSE 30 38 i j F 6" LIGHTWEIGHT • 28 41 6" DENSE • 43. I 43 • j 8" LIGHTWEIGHT • 34 46 i O 8" DENSE 55 48 - 1 U 3 - . a 12" LIGHTWEIGHT • 50 51 • : g 12" DENSE 80 53 ' 4" BRICK t 38 41 cn i c)J 8" BRICK t 80 49 - Q co }' 12" BRICK t • 120 54 —_�_ w 6" REINFORCED DENSE CONCRETE 75 46 kill" w v u) 8" REINFORCED DENSE CONCRETE 95 51 J • i O 3 12" REINFORCED DENSE CONCRETE 145 56 iealed against air leakage with 2 coats of sealer paint both sides oc similarly sealed. :areful workmanship: Air-tight joints and surface sealed. • I . • • ODIFICATIONS TO THE BASE CONSTRUCTIONS PRODUCE CORRESPONDING IMPROVEMENTS IN - rC-RATING • ODIFICATION STC RATING'IMPROVEMENT • PLANS (NO SCALE) • • FORMULA: >,ND FILLED CORES + 3 points IHI1qu Iuunnu1/q//111N1 Cumulative improvement of any combination of �M � �� these modifications is calculated thus: 1111111111111HNf11INIIIIANIHN Largest number+next largest number+ next largest number, etc. • 2" SANDED PLASTER 1 Side + 2 points 1R SIMILAR SURFACE SKIN) 2 Sides + 4 points EXAMPLE: Given a base construction such as 4" Lightweight IGIDLY FURRED 1 Side + 7 points Block=STC-36 JRFACE SKIN 2 Sides + 10 points Add: " Resilient plaster skin ESILIENTLY ATTACHED 1 Side + 12 points j one side ' = 12 points • JRFACE SKIN 2 Sides + 15 points /� //ii Add: _ 1 Side + 3 points Sand in cores = 3 3SORPTION IN CAVITY 2 Sides -I 5 points '►�i!�'l.'i'��:94.51.!dP.P4�l►�1J4' points Add: ' 1II/////////////////////////////L Plaster on IVIDING WALL INTO MO`—�=�=� opposite . %/U/%//////////%/////////%/////, y side 2 points EPARATE WYTHES WITH + 15 points = " AIR SPACE "///////O////////////_ . , • Total 17 points MENIIMIp _/ Therefore"base construction" increases from • • STC-36 to STC-53. we S.Gutierrez;Vincent G.Kling and'Associates;Philadelphia,Pennsylvania . - ' - . le F.Verges,Consulting Engineer;Downers Grove,Illinois orms surFat..,,s teTM furniture AE1 200 6 44 Tables \ \" N4ok 411111111ftigfillit aim* /etc Aet.A.roveei. PLANNING a CITY 0 •E MAR °6 7z ? Pedestals To Order,Specify: 0 Marble Pedestals 1. Product Number Pedestals are created in a selection of four classic marbles that match 2. Quantity our table tops.The 5 inch diameter column and 18 inch diameter base 3. Color or marble selection provide a substantial look and solid foundation.A cast metal collar allows easy attachment of the table top. Concrete Pedestals Two handsome pedestal designs are created in Portland cement with fine aggregate.These are made available in natural grey and four integral concrete colors.The surface is acid etched to create a slight texture,and sealed to inhibit stains.These pedestals are also offered in a black color coating,specially formulated for application to concrete.A metal top plate allows easy attachment of the table top. Permanent Mount Pedestals Permanent mount pedestals are designed for installation on a concrete slab or foundation.A 3 inch diameter steel column is finished in a durable,polyester powder coating and attached to a tubular galvanized steel anchor that is embedded in the concrete.We also offer an optional bolt-to-the-floor base plate welded to the column.Permanent mount pedestals are available in black,white and 8 Forms+Surfaces colors. Metal Pedestals Standard pedestals are cast in aluminum and finished in a durable polyester powder coating in black,white or 8 Forms+Surfaces colors. This cleanly designed and practical unit is also our most reasonably priced pedestal. • Indicates items normally available from stock Marble Pedestals •AE1250 H28 Dia.18 Colors: • White • Dark Green Grey Black Concrete Pedestals t t:_ l •AE1260 H28 Dia.17 AE1261 H28 Dia. 18 Colors: •Natural(Grey) Buff Sandstone Tierra Brown Charcoal Permanent Mount Pedestals • •AE1270 H28 Dia.3 Table Base_ ' AE1271 H28 Dia.3—with base plate Color: • White Bronze Set Screw_. . Lam._Set Screw • Black Brown Red Tan Blue Green Anchor Grey Teal Metal Pedestals C PLANNING DIVISION •AE1280 H28 Dia.23 RENTON Colors: • White Bronze MAR • Black Brown 0 6 1990 Red Tan �r�• Blue Green iltet'VED Grey Teal AE1 200 Tables The AE12Q0 series introduces a beautiful new group of tops and Table Tops pedestals for outdoor or indoor installations.Tops are available in marble, Marble Table Tops fiberglass,perforated metal and melamine.Pedestals are of marble, The classic and timeless beauty of natural marble is offered in three metal and concrete.We offer an extensive pallet of colors,both unique to standard sizes,and at very affordable prices.Custom sizes and shapes each material,and matched to our other Site Furniture series.By are available upon request.Select from four beautiful veined marbles, utilizing the mix and match capabilities of our tops and pedestals,you finished with a comfortable full radius edge.A plywood disc bonded to can create designs that will blend beautifully with your project and add a the underside provides for simple attachment to the pedestal.Use with statement of quality and excellence. matching marble pedestals or any of our other table pedestals. Perforated Metal Table Tops Heavy guage perforated steel table tops are finished in a durable,two- stage polyester powder coat,in colors to match our wide selection of metal chairs and benches.The pleasant full-radius rolled edge and handsome colors make these high-tech table tops an ideal selection for any commercial or institutional application. Melamine Table Tops . A super-hard melamine surface on a tough,dimensionally stable inner core makes these table tops unsurpassed for low cost,durability and minimum maintenance. An excellent selection for exterior applications and food service use. Fiberglass Table Tops Fiberglass table tops are moulded with a subtle pattern of small raised domes similar to the pattern of our perforated metal table tops.The hard polyester surface is fiberglass reinforced and bonded to a 3/4"plywood core.The generous bullnose edge adds to the pleasing and substantial character of these table tops. Marble Table Tops AE1201 Dia. "36 �; •AE1202 Dia. "42 •AE1203 Dia.42" Custom sizes and shapes on request. Colors: •White Grey •Dark Green Black Perforated Metal Table Tops •AE1210 Dia.36" •AE1211 Dia.45" Colors: • White Bronze lv°" • Black Brown • Red Tan Blue Green Grey Teal Melamine Table Tops • AE1220 Dia.24" r \r�i�� O�iV V V V�``j\`jV``%``�i•AE1221 Dia.30" �// /�\ �O��/AE1222 Dia.36" 1v°" Oj i,�/i��i/�/.��i.�.A.Ai�.Colors: •White iVanilla \ ��\ Fiberglass Table Tops AE1230 Dia.36" •AE1235 36"x 36" •AE1231 Dia.42" ��// �.///�//��///��/// Colors: •White 11 " %i///i\ i\\ Custom colors on request i / Forms+Surfaces Site Furniture Division Box 5215 Santa Barbara,CA 93150(805)969-7721 °Copyright Forms+surfaces 1987 itsa '1-4 .1 'a . r. 11 White Dark Green Black Grey . K_. : T;; ?;" . Melamine Top With Metal Pedestal White Marble Top and Pedestal Perforated Metal Top With Concrete Pedestal T ti ri y. Fiberglass Top Close Up Melamine Top With Concrete Pedestal Perforated Metal Top Close Up - ....-st,"'-''''k.1-v' • '' - I. '---.-.:..-,,, '.**.1-:' -• ,'.• • ''''',. 7' -•-• 0 • ' - • -. •or ....' .. ,,, • 4 ., .. . . ,,,o;. , ..---1. .4 4,...,''.'i ‘ :•'.'. .. • -- - ' v." 71.• • ..•1•7•14•'• — .4.... ''',.•.*44,- . • i .- . ' .0- --'1' '6, y, 6. .• 4...4;-.: . - •in....;:. rp 1 .f.p.A. • -,.,- , •.e.ht.,_4., - ...,dadolk' larrtvitai,...,,--‘,:."-: ..-:- . •'''''. N4 „ .-,"--j '' . 1-' S----4:41k,"Q.-.41,,,,g.. •s'jik't" ..e.,.. -.'velert. .. --.--7 • =,!•.0':%,".kte..' • - .„,-. .e-lip - zi• 14 . -• '-',.tsit- •.' ••:.- -,......t- . -,.-• (-"--, . _ .. ''''- ( __.---•:....: ( ''-ii; ', ..•r: 4,r. ''• . ••••.,,.. . .. .: . •.,,...,..,:,,....146, • ./1,1-. ••-, —.A.• , uk ' ',. ".',,} ,A.;-•-. ..• • . . . ... ... a. At,... '( 4 t,. , • .,. ..., .t. --4. ' 't;,‘-i: ' • .....- ..... ' .... ti.-' ' - ' , .• - . • . , ' -..:1.......,.,:„., ....-...,...--- ',..:,,....:.-,:......,•-.2,,..-...p.,4.,-! ,. _4ittre tL.,..,,:.'-4,i„..--iviti-------:,--71-;\1--,'. ''.1- ..'"' •- - ' 7:4.--A*. 161. ... .... . _ . . -m• - .,',ki,i. •,... _ . . ... --,•-•_.---.: -.14.,••••_- . , - —:„;..;•;.,.., .,-•,:i...:,.....:,....ii7:::: ,.:.).....„:„...,,..,....,::;.!:„..i......:::,. , : ,:i...:,:...:1741... .... ‘_ _,„:. '7*" , .,_.-.: - .• ..---_:.....6"-,.; ----..b0r. : • '-4, . ._ _ _.-41:::4-4,'-:::: '• _ -.. v.. ,- .• • ,.. --,...r...- 71 ...., ••• _ - ..- !,.s....- __- ,,,._ , '-•-••-..., ‘,....... - •.r*,:-,Y....'...:4.'4i. , . ', • r ._ . .,_ .. •,. ,.•,-,.., „.3.. ., , , • ._. .. . _ ......„, .. , . ' '-' . ..., .. .... , .., . .... • -•, . ..... • • 'Is; 'w47.7.,..• ..,,, ,., .,,.1,,,,, . 4..,., ,,, • ••-• ' ---t" . r'''''- 4- r'-', .,., ,— , .=---, 1 i noir , ,,.. .,., ,..)..,-i,e,, ,.4.?.4.4,-.:,.,- - ---"-T•14 '''.---',--t---- _ --.----;-.,•,,. -....;.-Tit• ' ,- . ,-,- --'''"....`ri,essarazumFirawanomw.-•-a,i,-, . . .. , ::..:.::„.,..:i ,.1..c?"1.,!•• ...v3":4.,•, .. .•_.;:p.•:,...it......,-,0,..,,,...;;',-• ' ' .:.'•...7,;.,,s4• - _ --------- --, ,.....:„.. V.'.,.,•T„ .,/a *MEROMW.-- ..-1KW----•,.. -'-an -,..A.,'' ' - •••,:4-X, .';',4-,Hil''ft:W.'-''•--',-'-'4"_'4-'., .. 1-A..44.'';'•.. ' -'•••.: - . _ "';',..'",i,-.;W , ‘lt•:-..;:,Z.-,li...:-.,...-e-' : -'•=.,,,-• . - : ,-.=..-1.:P.• - ''-'''-riqt-D" it:;--f.',----..., g..:tii`•: .,'''''._ .'lvitiOL4,'-,",'-- -- •;--. -1._ ..":',..`,•-.,•;:d!-.,....-,,:,,,,,..„.-e,..,z-z.•*?-4-17;.-q.„),,,:,.V-,- --7-- --4,_-_-:kz. ... .., ... "e)--- --.6.4e4AN7,--i;...,•:,.::.:,7,1-:,- ---f.-.-°?-- ,..-„,,, ,,,.„. .,,..„..v-,,,,,,,,:,7,&_,-.-:-.,„..,-a,--,--,,-;.›7.- . , . . , . 44.. 'A' • 6k . . d''''...;-,.. -;_t,.,..1.,-Z-•:',-,.•.6'',,;474."-liv -," ,, ''''' ' ---'''',,v-'--4•:::-,..--., •-.."--;.--- -4.--' ,- F : ‘'-,.•'va-Agt"----,.- 414,-4T.441,*' , .--- ..• .;-:<,,;.;:„ ,:,j,gfT-,,-..,-.,, ,,%.:‘,.-,.--.-f-t•::1-`7,-:.,'„-- • ... . 7--•._%....t......,,.. -4„.,,_, ....7.:-„- -4,,,,Iii— .-...6_E 419 ,Re d. . ',,,.:,,i-:1•.,.,.11.,-'....k.:;`,' 'r , _. , , „ APEe AlAio /30.'‘/cfr'l ., . .,... a . , ....,_ .., . .- , . .. ` . .-- , . . , , . • . •t: . ,„‘ 4 .. • .;;:'..."7.;,.••••,!.•.-- -,-..,1':, ..!‘..,4'....-',,.-..---!.....'.- , . .. •,,'.'..•.A. f...,-..,..11;.$73.1'.. .°.‘•••••A*14='4?-",f7t.' -- - - - i --_ „_.,. ..:._,1_ ''•;-:•A it.tc4%1..,,41-- •--mg. „4-:•?-1,,,,if....C4c_,.-vit...4.-..4.• _.....„6„._ . .1"A-. 4.„.4-..... .-..-v•-ijr..4-.......,-x..."-- ••- - , ...- • .-. ,••••,4';•:....--:•••• i;•.:1-t. l ',..-:,:-•-:-'::. ,,..-',';- - . • : -:. • . ...-. • ,.,— • . - • -,. - • :,.. .- - :.. .•.,t," .., .,..:,,,t.• ., -,-i..-L-:.:- •,---, .•-.' -' '..5•'.• . . - . • ' • +.' • • • .•. . - 1 --___ ii . . . ------------ 7 , .."• ... . -------- ' ..i - . . . • • . . . • . • • • ......, ) AE4101. Red I .. , ..r„,„•.. . , . .......,,,v447.;.-..‘,,,,..,- . , . . , „..• -1.-. -3- t- ----- „ .. ,..„.„.•,:7-,..4...,;„„,..„. • ,. . . . . . . . ' . • .. . ..., . .. • . . . • . . . -. .....-.....—........—....•=== =•••••••••""• ""WM............M.M.".....11..M..111.11..M.11111111.111.1MIMMIIMIMMIMI I . . . . . • , . . . I . . . .• .... ... . . . • . . . . .. . . • ' . .. . . . , • .. . . . . . • .. , . ' . . . . • • . . . i g I i. • - . . . . . . . • . . . . • . - . 8 0 Pr a I -`1 . . 1 . . . . . . • . . . - 0 .. . 4. . . . . ... . \n ,.., , . .4.11.1111111.11.1101.1111.."........"......"............W. • . • . • . . • • . . . • .. . . . •4 r . . . . . . . I • ellmi. i . . . . . . . I . • . I . I .. . ..•., 6 , . • I • • . . \ . .... 1 V . . • I • . . _ . . . . = ,, • i . -‘i • / • . • frl , . ....\ . . . • . is • • el!.../ , -. , / ,,• ',\„.., . p. . - ' ( •. 4' i n . .1 \ . Ili ...„ . . . I/ • )'-• . i-• /. I . ..••0. / •'t . i ir • • • • • - . [.......0. , , • , . I. i 1,,I• 1 I 1,• .. . .• i, • V . h . _7 • • up. . . . f ...vfo. . , .. . .• , . . . . , . . ... . . • , . . . / ,..: . . ..1-.. .• LI° . 42.#41 -4 :,:,/; • • . / ..• .1,„ 1- .. /. .. ._•t, ... . I v 1 I • ,•:/ '1 . • ‘ '" Of.,,: ' '.4 ' . • .' . el el .67 .aig gag4 i 4, 740/1 •"!-. e 1 , Allik. ,,,,if .' f••.. :•,4:.i.::.-...'• •' ';/ ' 1110,-.........A....../..k. • . .., . . ' ., , . . . ..I•• ./ / •// . .i ,,,.„,...: . ----- . • • . . - • • 6-'4 .. .. r.. ..Oil : ...... , . . a' . 7• ,' • - • • ! . ; 0 • . /I • , . .• I . I .. • 4 .... . . . . 3 • 4 ....,.....„,,x .,., :". . .[ i t 111411.111 . . . . 1. .-..........--- ............+.4.! re 11. • hilli •• Poll . ' . , w . ) Lel • . • ..iy". ,,. . 1.1 . . ., - .. \\,..._.• . _ A —.• • . Aiiiir,Pr l... II -•un.- •• ), .... • . . . . W. / A.,. ,- To ,..„. ... iv_ „iv. , • • , . . .. .: e IN , 4 . . . . . . .. . . . • . . .._ ih... . L., ... ..... / , ..,„ .... . .. ....41 . .... ..h. _AL.' :::".. .....a...A.___ ti a . ..s.e•--- 2 ..., .• . . • • - . . . ik 4 • . . . • . . . . • . . . . . . . 1 . . .. . . • . . . • • • .• , . . . . 1 . , . . , . • . . , . • • • . . . . . . . . i'it • . . . • I 1 t . . . . . • . . • . . . . . • • . • . . . . . . • • . • . . . . . . . . . . . • . • • . . . . X . , ..• [re 0? -•• . . . . . /40,-,,---- _ . • . 0 = , .• '411/(1 oti ,,,,, . . "0, cl7ine---7. • • '''''''-' c--8 7' • 0661, r i . • • . • • . . . Fiff c..0 .0 .irii , c„ z -3 o p7" , . . . . • ,„,,,,,_ , ..1,,, . • . . . . . -.) • • if . . . 1.1 50 i‘ a ft',., . • • 4--,,,,,,,r,,...:...,,•0 ',....4,,i . . . . . '''• , „. . . . .. :.:- .. . . -....,••••„,_ s . • . . • . . • . . . . .., . . . . • . . • • • • • ; . .• . . " . • w-. /I ~�;�-',•,,''F..6 • . -; . .. '�+R /1 r('yd • • t 1:., ei �•„• cam-4 f f ,; • L ..► f• „ r, S� In �� _ . a f Y . I . . illt;,'ten. ' • . • i ',: !. 4 . . '1111111 . or . . ,• • . . . f•'..-• '4''• ' • `P,'.% r • ,..:',...11:,.1i1::esg,r''''..:)1,...'. • . !IVO .1... ', A . ..:".$ . '. .'' . , • :.:::...:__--._.7:.:.:=-1-0,--- itred__ 1 .0 k ' . . ':'.'"Ii) • • I ��1 Y Air�i . I, Mie :�, •. • ,•mmirip Tor .... . . 'f,',.t.'4 . iiiip . 4 , I: . i , ~y.T , ill + �� ,y (. . . big i � I I ..,;.;,,,fir.• :i.z i .. f I • • r• • • .. . 5-1):. •. • . _ • ,All b : . . i l , run, • • r l glii . . • LT . f. n � • • c � . . IT C:3 �� . coo ®1,4 ;: , - ®CY •z°o z DATE: February 26, 1990 TO: File FROM: � Jerry Lind, Land Use Inspector/Landscape Planner SUBJECT: Strada da Valle File NO. ECF,SA-058-87 I today reviewed revised plans submitted for the above referenced project and my comments regarding the revisions are as follows: 1. The lawn area with street trees between the biofiltration swale and sidewalk should be bermed 18"-24" . Trees should be center in the berm, not at the edge of the swale as illustrated. I also suggest using a water tolerant species of tree along this area in place of the oak trees, ie: Red Maple, and additional trees should be provided along East Valley Road spaced approximately 35-40 on center. 2 . Tree plantings along the east side (adjacent SR-167) are rather sparse. Suggest additional coniferous trees be mixed in with the shrubbery, ie: Pine and Fir species. 3 . Provide ground cover with trees and shrubbery east of Buildings "A" and "B" . 4 . The outside recreation space proposed with the revision (running track) , does not appear to be as useful as the previous recreation approved (basketball court) . Would recommend going back to the original proposal and including some outside picnic tables and seating in this area. 5. The change of square footage with the buildings seems reasonably acceptable. The former buildings did have pitched roofs which architecturally, may have been more interesting. 6. The court yards proposed between buildings "A"-"B" and between "B"-"C" are a positive enhancement to the site. 7. The project requires a total of 280 parking stalls if based upon total gross square footage. The application proposes 287 parking stalls. At least 7 of these parking stalls should be eliminated and the space incorporated into open space landscaping. If net square footage is used for calculating a parking count (which is permissible) , and an efficiency rate of 85% is used, a minimum parking count of 238 parking stalls can be used. JFL:strada:dskll CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: February 20, 1990 TO: File SUBJECT: Revision of Environmental Determination Strata da Valle File SA-058-87 During 1989, the property owner's representative met with representatives of the Public Works and Community Development Departments to discuss changes in City policies affecting Condition No. 1 of the Determination. Representatives of the owner and City met to discuss changes in the Valley Transportation mitigation program as it impacted the improvements and mitigation fee originally required for the project. An agreement was reached with the assistance of the City Attorney that the condition needed to be modified. The condition now reads as follows: The applicant shall participate in the Valley Transportation Mitigation Program that will be embodied in the Renton Valley Transportation Policy when adopted. This new condition replaces Condition No. 1 including the note regarding the reservation of property along the southern property line. The Public Works Department has determined the reservation of this property is no longer necessary for future roadway construction. _ t, PLMNING DIVISION lance mueller CrrY OF RENTON & associates JAN 2 91990 architects a1guiEtV January 29, 1990 Ms. Jeanette Samek-McKague CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Ms. Samek-McKague, This resubmittal of Strada daValle includes a revision of building 'C' and its immediate surrounding site. The re- vision of Building ' C' includes an increase of building floor area from 26,800 to 30,994 sq.ft. , a total of 15% increase. The basic configuration, use and aesthetics or architecture are virtually unchanged. Attached to this submittal is an artist's rendering of the completed project. This submittal also includes a biofiltra- tion swale as requested by the City of Renton. In providing for the swale, the elimination of a berm at the west of the site became necessary. Also, located at the south end of the site is the addition of another swale, as well as a running track for active recreation. If you should have any questions, please give me a call . Thanks. Sincerely, LAN, MUELLER & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS Ali' Dion.404 :.n io g Project Architect DY/f attachment 130 lakeside • suite 250 • Beattie,waehington 99122 • 206/326-2663 • fax:[206]326-0664 lance mueller ale,cal • senior associates:robert olscheweky,eileen furney associates:robert fedden,mkhael gelbraith,richard hernioh,robert wells e weshington corporation furnishing architectural services by end under the supervision of registered architects • ....._.__,_—.--..----------------:_t_._._____.-- r' • w,v - �r • II IIPo Ii )11P �. ' wYiw ' ...U. - xi.'•b a �'` . v v ,- , p1 Mi ,.,..044 COMPUT I ,I � - w Mr Mr , 10 i 1 . .. , ,..e 1.,.t.. . , „,..,.. ..„,E , ...z.„ It . , , 4 II�r 1I. , . y ( -, . . . ... ( ` li r v pie. • i g w w u . 4 r `` . a• A N ,,e, a w. „ , x - LANCE MUELLER P °�1Pb�g0 P!/PSPOR{ � in_ 0{P 4G IRISE 01T11 L ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECT , crry oP=RE nN, r 130 Lakeside Suite 250 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 91990 DATE /f . JOB NO. (206) 325-2553 Ci'a C "/{�' qqq f' t7`4/J D ATT NTION erAyfejg ./ TO 4IJI2DIIV /Z4/0/1/4 7:RE: 6 , 10/11— 1/;2_ S 0 . / éIá7J//t/ WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints 0 Plans ❑ Samples 0 Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION Lam%J G/2- 5/7"7a-7-y4 f2e, �/IA .� ce11.0, -A C eL�V S. �� , sires 1 G 1220-44 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use 0 Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested 0 Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS I COPY TO SIGNED: I�-..wln....w. ..w nM .. nn�wA 47nAly nn►Hv . .�nnrw WATERFRONT REPROGRAPril p'9 j-03 WESTERN AVENUE CCrY I.)r RENTON * SEATTLE, WA 98104 (206)467-9889 9 '199a ti� q JAN 2 �oGRP�Q DATE a KG b L G U`'S /310 I. 0 0� AD1 ORD RED BY ORDER NO. SHIPPED VIA DUE 25,30 DESCRIPTION I ITS Pc NO. OF PACKAGES RECEIVED COMPLETE ORDER NC PARTIAL ORDER ORIGINALS ENCLOSED YES I I NO ` / HALINEN & ASSOCIATES Attorneys at Law DAVID L.HALINEN,P.E. Bellevue Place,Suite 376 (206)454-8272 RHYS A.STERLING,P.E. 800 Bellevue Way NE FAX(206)646-2851 W.THEODORE VANDER WEL Bellevue,Washington 98004 November 28, 1989 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON VIA TELECOPIER & REGULAR MAIL NOV 2 91989 City of Renton RECEIVED Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Street Renton, Washington 98055 Attn: Ms. Janette Samek-McKague Re: Request for Amendment to Site Plan Approval and Environmental Mitigation Measures for "Strada De Valle" (formerly "Renton Campus") Site Plan Approval No. SA-058-87/Environmental Review No. ECF-053-87 (Project ID 6687C-Plan Check No. 6729) Dear Ms. McKague: On behalf of AnMarCo, the owner/developer of the proposed Strada De Valle project, I hereby request amendments to three of the conditions relating to the Site Plan Approval for the project. The three requested amendments are as follows: 1. The condition for a bermed landscape strip along East Valley Road (set forth as Condition No. 2 of SA-058-87) should be eliminated. 2 . SEPA Condition No. 1 of ECF-053-87 should be amended to simply require the applicant's participation in the Valley Transportation Mitigation Program that will be embodied in the Renton Valley Transportation Policy when finally it is adopted. (All references to the previously proposed reservation of right-of- way for a future Southwest 27th Street along the south boundary of the site should be eliminated from both SA-058-87 and ECF-053-87. ) 3 . Condition No. 1 of SA-058-87 should be updated to reflect the requested amendment to Condition No. 1 of ECF-053-87 . As you know, the reason for the elimination of the berming condition is that the Renton Engineering Department has insisted upon extensive biofiltration swales, which swales can only be fully accommodated by utilizing the landscape strip along the East Valley Ms. Janette Samek-McKague City of Renton November 28, 1989 Page 2 Road right-of-way margin (in addition to utilizing the swale that is now proposed along the running track near the site's south boundary) . As to the modification of SEPA condition No. 1 and the elimination of references of the previously proposed SW 27th Street reservation, City Attorney Larry Warren, Traffic Engineering's John Adamson and Public Works Director Lynn Guttman all agreed during a conference I had with them on September 7, 1989, that the changes being made to the Valley transportation mitigation program mandate the above-requested amendment. You may wish to consult with Mr. Adamson or Mr. Warren to confirm. Please phone me should you have any questions regarding the above or if there are any additional materials you may need for processing this request. Sincerely, HALINEN & ASSOCIATES 3.--"(1.7*2"e6;1-124/ David L. Halinen DLH:rkd cc: Mr. Gary M. Merlino (via/telecopy) Mr. Dion Young, Lance Mueller & Assoc. (via/telecopy) HALINEN & ASSOCIATED Attorneys at Law DAVID L.HALINEN,P.E. Bellevue Place,Suite 376 (206)454-8272 RHYS A.STERLING,P.E. 800 Bellevue Way NE FAX(206)646-2851 W.THEODORE VANDER WEL Bellevue,Washington 98004 VIA TELECOPIER AND REGULAR MAIL OCT 2 3 1989 October 20, 1989 L ,., Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator City of Renton Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Strada Da Valle Your File Number: ECF;SA-058-87 Dear Mr. Erickson: In response to your letter of October 10, 1989, and on behalf of my client, AnMarCo, I hereby request an extension of the site plan approval for the above-referenced project. As you know, my client has already filed a building permit application for this project. Currently, the project architect and the project civil engineer are completing minor revisions to the site plan necessitated by the requirement for a grass lined biofiltration swale for the project. I anticipate that such plans will be resubmitted within the next two to three weeks along with a request for a minor amendment to the Site Plan Approval to eliminate the conditions regarding berming along East Valley Road and the reservation for future Southwest 27th Street. Because of my client's substantial progress towards securing a building permit for this project, an extension is well warranted. We therefore respectfully request that you approve a two year extension pursuant to Ordinance 4008 . Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, HALINEN & ASSOCIATES • David L.2kuicire i DLH:cac cc: Mr. Gary M. Merlino c: 110 CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division October 10, 1989 David L. Halinen Halinen & Associates Attorneys at Law Bellevue Place, Suite 376 800 Bellevue Way N.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 Subject: Strada Da Valle File #ECF;SA-058-87 Location: The east side of the East Valley Highway north of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 block of the East Valley Road. Dear Mr. Halinen: Please be advised that you must notify me in writing if you wish to extend the Site Plan Approval for the above referenced project. The present site plan approval expires on December 7, 1989 as per Renton Zoning Ordinance, Section 4-738 (I): "Time Limits: The final approval of a site plan shall expire within two (2) years of the date of approval. A single two (2) year extension may be granted for good cause by the approval body which approved the original site plan. The approval body may, however, determine at its discretion that a public hearing may be required for such extension. (Ordinance 4008, 7-14-86)." If you have any questions regarding the extension of the application, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague of my staff or myself at 235- 50. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/MBS/adk cc: Gary Merlino 9125 10th Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98108 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 r JUIY Gl 'C7 i •'ll LHi 1Lt nUtLLtF OVJb dCti-✓UDD4 I'. I FAX Tm LARISMJSS1ON SHEE' a-: ' DATE: ► - /fir" ,I , . TO: G''1" . 54 .. ei /i�/4 I./ri • J ATTN: irOird Je•el gesepoel _ PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JOB: TJUN 2 2 1989 0 - , iHdllll IE NUMBER OF PAGES (COVER SHEET INCLUDED) DESCRIPTION: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: je,';i121 /rI'„ 1 r OM 01, e..01//esedokioly,"144 111.440 der,Zedir---).Y4 Ito"'00 ofill#10/401/0 "VW .effe- #7 .. .r/2014-1 C pei° IF Y.. DID NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES INDICATED ABOVE, PLEASE CALL 00 - ,/ / 0/ 441 206 325 25 -, / s 1 = ; lance . mueiier a,, associates t architects 130 lakeside • seattle vteash. 98122 ., FAX 208 388 0554 JUN 21 '89 15:10 LANCE MUELLER 206 328-0554 - P. 1 il " • •. Rt1vr �� 0 4:;r1 FFR 18 1988 CITY OF RENTON ai•il. ; '1, l ANCE MUE±r ER & ASSOC. BUILDING & ZONING, DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 15, 1987 • David L. Ralinen Attorney At Law 3015 - 3.12th Avenue R.E• , St. 203 Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE: Renton Campus Site Plan Review, SA-058-87 Dear )Ir. Halinen: (:::ank you for your letter of February 10, 198rregarding the atus of the above referenced project. I spoke with Jerry nd and apparently there has been some confusion regarding s communications on this project. - ,� - . . - -viewed - ' - . .re. iminar si = . , , i : +` �I > =ir'owing the propose. sea ng areas► and p cn c tables as well partial basket ball court. After reviewing this with the rks and" Recreation Department staff, Jerry says he talked th both you and Lance Mueller's project architect and said told you both that the plan looked acceptable. If your terpretation of these events is different, please let me ow. Regarding Condition No. 3, we still want trees provided along the east edge of the site per the landscape plan submitted July 15, 1987 . Jerry Lind says he sees no problem getting the landscaping in. If you are now saying that the landscaping shown on the Landscape Plan dated June 29, 1987 cannot be provided because of topographical constraints, please clarify this in writing as soon as possible. You note that in your opinion there was an error in judgement regarding the landscaping. If there was an error it would have been by the applicant or his landscape architect, since trees have clearly been shown on the east side of the proposed three buildings ever since the original submission. The proposed recreational areas' with benches and lunch, tables for employee's benefit can be located as proposed in' the Preliminary Site Plan dated December 11, 1987. The half basketball court is fine as now shown. The scattered passive recreational equipment appears to be adequate per tha Preliminary Site Plan however this plan needs to be finalized. . i . 200 Mill Avenue Sour_ c. Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540: % CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division June 8, 1989 Mr. Dion Young - Lance Mueller & Associates 130 Lakeside Seattle, WA 98122 Subject: Strada da Valle (Renton Campus) 2350 East Valley Road File No. SA-058-87 Dear Mr. Young: This letter is written as a follow up to our telephone conversation yesterday afternoon regarding the above referenced project that is pending building permit review. Review by Planning Division staff has determined that a number of substantial changes have occurred with this project since it was initially reviewed and approved administratively on November 23, 1987. The most evident of the changes to have occurred centers around Building No. "C" to the south. The siting, configuration, and square footage of this building clearly deviates away from the approved plan, and therefore, we are unable to approve this alteration with the building permit. As we discussed, Section 4-738(F) defines "major adjustments" as a substantial change in the basic site design plan (Building "C" does represent such a change), intensity, density, use and the like, generally involving more than a ten (10%) change in area or scale. As I noted to you in our phone conversation today, the 10% measure must be applied to each individual building in making a determination since to do otherwise would not make any sense. With a multiple building configuration such as yours, one could otherwise delete or add whole buildings and still be within 10% of the approved area or density. Site plan review, as we discussed, is exactly that, the approval of an acceptable site plan including building layout and location, parking, pedestrian circulation, form and massing of buildings, screening, lighting, and landscaping. Building "C", because of it's changes in area and configuration as currently designed, will be required to go back to the Site Plan Approval Committee for administrative review and approval unless the original plan is more closely adhered to. The Committee will also need to re-evaluate other site features around the entire site such as the revised parking, landscaping and recreation amenities, etc. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Dion Young Strada da Valle (Renton Cam)us) June 8, 1989 Page 2 Building "A" and "B" are fairly close to what was shown and approved in the original site plan. We expect to accept them for building permits shortly, providing all other City staff involved in the plan checking process have signed off on them. We would suggest that you make arrangements with the Building Division and reorganize the pending building permit application by making it either a phased operation to include the northern most buildings (A & B) and reapplying for a revised Office Building Complex "C". Another alternative would be to make Building "C" more closely reflect the original building shown in the site plan approval. I would expect it to take another four (4) to five (5) weeks for us to approve the revised site plan for "C" and it's reconfigured parking . Should you want to continue with the revision as you have expressed to do so, we will assist you with the necessary application forms. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact either Jerry Lind or myself at this office. Since this is an administrative decision you have the right to appeal it to the Hearing-Examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date of this letter (Section 4-3011[B][b]). Your appeal, if you decide to do so, must be accompanied by a $75,00 filing fee payable to the City of Renton. The appeal hearing process takes approximately six (6) weeks. rely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:JFL:young:dsk5 cc: Building Division Anmarco Development Co. At SA - 0 58-69 lance Mueller PLANNING DIVISION & associates CITY OF RENTON architects , MAR 7 1989 March 6, 1989 Mr. Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator CITY OF RENTON BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 'Re: STRADA DA VALLE (RENTON CAMPUS) Dear Don, Per our phone conversation on 3-6-89 regarding the DNS mitigating measure #4, a biofiltering swale will not be required .for this site on the basis that stormwater run- off will be discharged into the city's street storm system and will not be discharged directly into the P-9 Channel . If you have any questions, please feel free to call . Sincerely, • LANCE. MU LLER & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS Dion YfoUng DY:ks 130 lakeside • suite 250 • seattle,washington 98122 • 208/325-2553 • fax: [209)328-0554 lance mueller ale,cal • senior associates:robert olachewaky,oilcan furney associates:robert fedden,michael galbraith,richerd harnish,robert wells a Washington corporation furnishing architectural services by and under the supervision of registered architects L, - �; �; CITY •►F : E TON tag ,L BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director %Gc February 15, 1987 David L. Halinen Attorney At Law 3015 - 112th Avenue N.E. , St. 203 Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE: Renton Campus Site Plan Review, SA-058-87 Dear Mr. Halinen: Thank you for your letter of February 10, 1987 regarding the status of the above referenced project. I spoke with Jerry Lind and apparently there has been some confusion regarding his communications on this project. Jerry says he reviewed the revised preliminary site plan dated December 11, 1987 showing the proposed seating areas and picnic tables as well as partial basket ball court. After reviewing this with the Parks and Recreation Department staff, Jerry says he talked with both you and Lance Mueller°s project architect and said he told you both that the plan looked acceptable. If your interpretation of these events is different, please let me know. Regarding Condition No. 3, we still want trees provided along the east edge of the site per the landscape plan submitted July 15, 1987 . Jerry Lind says he sees no problem getting the landscaping in. If you are now saying that the landscaping shown on the Landscape Plan dated June 29, 1987 cannot be provided because of topographical constraints, please clarify this in writing as soon as possible. You note that in your opinion there was an error in judgement regarding the landscaping. If there was an error it would have been by the applicant or his landscape architect, since trees have clearly been shown on the east side of the proposed three buildings ever since the original submission. The proposed recreational areas with benches and lunch tables for employee's benefit can be located as proposed in the Preliminary Site Plan dated December 11, 1987. The half basketball court is fine as now shown. The scattered passive recreational equipment appears to be adequate per the Preliminary Site Plan however this plan needs to be finalized. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 David L e Halinen February 15, 1988 Page 2 At this time I would be hesitant to ask the ERC to reconsider Item 3 unless you still believe, after this clarification, that there are other issues that still warrant its reconsideration. Please let me know if this is the case. (771, Donald Ito Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cc:Dion Young, Lance Mueller & Assocos DAVID L. HALINEN, P.E., J.D. (206) 827-2637 ATTORNEY AT LAW Suite 203 3015-112th Avenue NE Bellevue,Washington 98004 February 10, 1988 Mr. Don Erickson t' . /7 1 • Zoning Administrator jh City of Renton Building & Zoning Department t 200 Mill Avenue '• Renton, Washington 98055 BU„ Ir: ZONING DEPT.Re: Renton Campus Site Plan Review Renton File No. SA-058-87 Dear Mr. Erickson: As you will recall , I submitted a Request for Reconsideration on the above-referenced site plan review December 7, 1987 . A few days later, Lance Mueller & Associates, the project architect, submitted an updated site plan in relation to the Request for Reconsideration. I spoke with Jerry Lind on January 25th regarding the status of the Request for Reconsideration, and he promised to look into it and get back to me. However, as of yet, I have received no feedback from him. In view of the above, I would appreciate your review of this matter and response as to its status. Sincerely, David L. Halinen DLH:sld cc: Mr. Gary Merlino -10 DAVID L. HALINEN, P.E., J.D. (206) 827-2637 ATTORNEY AT LAW Suite 203 December 7, 1987 3015-112th Avenue NE Bellevue,Washington 98004 HAND-DEIVERED W is �! 1 Mr. Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator DES; 127 City of Renton 3rd Floor City Hall 694'' :�t �, 9 - s`_°�FT. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Report and Decision of Site Plan Review Committee on File #SA-058-87 (Lance Mueller & Associates) REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION Dear Mr. Erickson: With respect to the above-referenced matter, on behalf of both the applicant and the owner (Lance Mueller & Associates and AnMarco, respectively) , I hereby request reconsideration of the following points of the Site Plan Review Committee's Decision of November 23, 1987: 1. Condition No. 3 of the decision requires, among other things, that trees be provided along the east edge of the site to create a visual buffer between SR167 and the proposed new buildings. Because the existing freeway drainage ditch (which is at a substantially lower elevation than the site itself) creates a steep slope and need for rockeries and/or retaining walls along this east edge, trees cannot reasonably be planted along the east edge. Therefore, we view this portion of Condition No. 3 to be an error of judgment and request that this condition be eliminated. 2. The Report and Decision fails to make clear whether or not the "lawned, common, passive recreational areas with benches and lunch tables for employees' benefit" (required by Condition No. 3) may be provided withhin areas otherwise considered to be satisfying parts of the proposed project's required landscaping. We hereby request clarification of this point. 3 . Condition No. 3 also mandates the provision of a recreational court. However, nothing in the report guides the location of where such a court may be situated. While suitable areas for about 5000 square feet of passive recreational use can be provided outside of the south 45 feet of the site that is contemplated for potential future freeway right-of-way { f� 1. IS Donald Erickson BEG e Page 2 December 7, 1987 (assuming such recreational space may be provided within areas otherwise considered to be satisfying parts of the proposed project's required landscaping) , sufficient space for a recreational court only seems to exist along the very south portion of the site. Therefore, we request clarification as to whether the recreation court can be provided within the south 45 feet of the site, and specifically request that such a location for the court be permitted. To assist in your consideration of items 2 and 3, above, I have asked Lance Mueller & Associates to prepare and submit to you by this Friday, December llth, an updated site plan that would specifically delineate where we would propose to situate the passive and active recreational areas. I therefore request that you consider that site plan along with this request for reconsideration and then issue an updated decision. Please phone me immediately if you have any questions or comments in this regard. Sincerely, David L. alinen cc: Mr. Gary Merlino, AnMarco Mr. Dion Young, Lance Mueller & Associates DAVID L. HALINEN, P.E., y.D. (206) 827-2637 ATTORNEY AT LAW Suite 203 December 7, 1987 3015-112th Avenue NE Bellevue,Washington 98004 HAND-DaIVERED Mr. Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator DEG 19a1 City of Renton 3rd Floor City Hall I3t.,::._f; :..;, ' ��.",'t<<' 1i l"PT. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Report and Decision of Site Plan Review Committee on File #SA-058-87 (Lance Mueller & Associates) REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION Dear Mr. Erickson: With respect to the above-referenced matter, on behalf of both the applicant and the owner (Lance Mueller & Associates and AnMarco, respectively) , I hereby request reconsideration of the following points of the Site Plan Review Committee's Decision of November 23, 1987: 1. Condition No. 3 of the decision requires, among other things, that trees be provided along the east edge of the site to create a visual buffer between SR167 and the proposed new buildings. Because the existing freeway drainage ditch (which is at a substantially lower elevation than the site itself) creates a steep slope and need for rockeries and/or retaining walls along this east edge, trees cannot reasonably be planted along the east edge. Therefore, we view this portion of Condition No. 3 to be an error of judgment and request that this condition be ; reliminated. 2 . The Report and Decision fails to make clear whether or not the "lawned, common, passive recreational areas with benches and lunch tables for employees' benefit" (required by Condition No. 3) may be provided withhin areas otherwise considered to be satisfying parts of the proposed project's required landscaping. We hereby request clarification of this point. 3 . Condition No. 3 also mandates the provision of a recreational court. However, nothing in the report guides the location of where such a court may be situated. While suitable areas for about 5000 square feet of passive recreational use can be provided outside of the south 45 feet of the site that is contemplated for potential future freeway right-of-way • 3 _ Donald Erickson DEG 1987 Page 2 pPlA..t; P:C4 December 7, 1987 (assuming such recreational space may be provided within areas otherwise considered to be satisfying parts of the proposed project's required landscaping) , sufficient space for a recreational court only seems to exist along the very south portion of the site. Therefore, we request clarification as to whether the recreation court can be provided within the south 45 feet of the site, and specifically request that such a location for the court be permitted. To assist in your consideration of items 2 and 3, above, I have asked Lance Mueller & Associates to prepare and submit to you by this Friday, December 11th, an updated site plan that would specifically delineate where we would propose to situate the passive and active recreational areas. I therefore request that you consider that site plan along with this request for reconsideration and then issue an updated decision. Please phone me immediately if you have any questions or comments in this regard. Sincerely, t avid L. allnen AA-L-" cc: Mr. Gary Merlino, An Marco Mr. Dion Young, Lance Mueller & Associates CITY 'OF RENTON • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT u Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division October 10, 1989 David L. Halinen Halinen & Associates Attorneys at Law Bellevue Place, Suite 376 800 Bellevue Way N.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 Subject: Strada Da Valle File #ECF;SA-058-87 Location: The east side of the East Valley Highway north of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 block of the East Valley Road. Dear Mr. Halinen: Please be advised that you must notify me in writing if you wish to extend the Site Plan Approval for the above referenced project. The present site plan approval expires on December 7, 1989 as per Renton Zoning Ordinance, Section 4-738 (I): "Time Limits: The final approval of a site plan shall expire within two (2) years of the date of approval. A single two (2) year extension may be granted for good cause by the approval body which approved the original site plan. The approval body may, however, determine at its discretion that a public hearing may be required for such extension. (Ordinance 4008, 7-14-86)." If you have any questions regarding the extension of the application, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague of my staff or myself at 235- 50. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/MBS/adk cc: Gary Merlino 9.125 10th Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98108 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 %o CITY OF RENTON "LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 9, 1987 Mr. Gerald W. Marbett Building & Land Development Division 450 King County Administration Bldg. Seattle, WA 98104 • Gentlemen: Transmitted'herewith are copies. of the Finalized Threshold Determinations and Environmental Checklists for-the following projects: Gary Merlin SA-058-87 James W. Dalpay R-072-87 Everett Ayers & Eugene.:Hofmann PP-067-87 Henderson Homes R-077-87•.• . If you have any questions, -please call 235-2540. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator • Enclosures DE:DB:ss 200 Mill Avenue South -•Renton, Washington 98055 (206) 235-2540' • vs CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ammo Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 6, 1987 Washington State Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Gentleman: Transmitted herewith are copies of the Final Determination of Non-Significances and Enviromental Checklist for the following projects: Oakesdale Associates SP-042-87 S4-007-87 ECF-032-87 Gary Merlin SA-058-87 ECF-053--87 James W. Dalpay R-072-87 ECF-061-87 Everett Ayers & Eugene Hofmann PP-067-87 ECF-057-87 If you have any questions, please call 235-2540. Sincerely, Dona1a—K. Erickson, ATCP Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:BD:ss 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 tr. Vsi CITY OF RENTON _ BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 1, 1987 David L. Halinen, Attorney Plaza Center Building, Suite 1000 10900 Northeast Eighth Street Bellevue, WA 98004 Subject: Environmental Review Committee Decision on Reconsideration of Mitigation Measures Re: Renton Campus Site Approval and Environmental Review (Files ECF-053-87, SA-058-87) Dear Mr. Halinen: Enclosed please find a copy of the Finalized Mitigation Measures from the Environmental Review Committee's threshold determination of the above referenced project. Since your application has already gone through the 15 day comment period, these mitigation measures are construed as final. The fourteen day appeal period will commence October 2, 1987. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely you s, a Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:BG:cb 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Renton Campus ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-053-87 APPLICATION NO. : SA-058-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: • Application for Site Plan Approval for two single story office buildings of 10, 000 sq. ft. and 17, 000 sq. ft. in Phase One and one single story 32, 120 sq. ft. office in Phase Two on a 5. 62 acre site. Project includes parking for 284 cars. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the East side of East Valley Highway North of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 Block of East Valle CONDITIONS: 1. That the applicant pay $197. 00 per trip (or an amount in accordance with the final adopted Valley mitigation program) in traffic mitigation fees as assessment for the Valley Transportation Benefit District based upon an ITE standard of 17. 7 trips per 1, 000 gross square feet of office area. Note to Applicant: This amount or portion thereof may be credited towards the eventual purchase of a 45 foot reservation of property along the southern property if this is determined to be needed in the future for roadway construction. 2 . That noise impacts to the proposed office buildings from SR 167 be mitigated with the . use of construction materials and/or berming and landscaping in order to reduce the interior noise levels to no higher than more that 50 dBA. 3 . That the applicant provide on site a minimum of 7, 500 sq. ft. of • usable exterior recreation space for employees which could include a mixture of active and passive uses in one large space or a number of smaller spaces. Note to Applicant: That the applicant is advised to work with the Building and Zoning staff on the location of appropriate passive recreation areas for employees. Some of this space could appropriately be located at the south end of the site. 4 . In order to mitigate stormwater impacts, one oil/water separator should be provided on-site and if at some future time any of the site's stormwater runoff is discharged into the P-9 Channel a biofiltering swale shall be introduced to intercept the runoff before it enters the swale channel. ( (4).) SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE • CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. November 23, 1987 APPLICANT: Lance Mueller & Associates LOCATION: Located on the east side of East Valley Highway, north of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 block of East Valley Road. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Application for Site Plan Approval for two single-story office buildings of 10,000 sq. ft. and 17, 000 sq. ft. in Phase One and one single-story 32, 120 sq. ft. office in Phase Two, on a: 5.62 acre site. Project includes parking for 284 cars on site.. COMMITTEE REVIEW: The review was conducted at 10: 00 a.m. on November 23, 1987, in the third floor conference room . of the Renton Municipal Building. The Committee review was conducted after receiving written comment from all divisions of the Public Works Department, both divisions of the Building and Zoning Department, and the Fire, Police, Parks and Policy Development Departments. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1 Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2 Site plan (received June 25, 1987) . Exhibit No. 3 Landscape plan (received June 25, 1987) . Exhibit No. 4 Building elevations (received June 25, 1987) plans. Exhibit No. 5 Determination of Non-significance (Sept. 9, 1987) . Exhibit No. 6 Environmental Review Committee Staff Report (August 12, 1987) . FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, and conducted on- site inspections by the Site Plan Review Committee, the Committee now makes and enters the following: Findings: 1. The applicant, Lance Mueller & Associates, has requested site plan approval to allow the construction of two single-story office buildings in the first phase, with an area of 10, 000 sq. ft. and 17,500 sq. ft. and a single-story office building of 32 ,120 sq. ft in the second phase. Parking for :248 cars will be provided on site along with landscaping. 2 . The applicant's file containing the application, the , State Environmental Policy Act (£EPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 'Site Plan Review C - nittee City of Renton Report and Decision Page 2 3 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C 1971 as amended) , a mitigated declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, the responsible official. The mitigated declaration of non-significance was based upon the fact that potentially adverse impacts associated with the project were felt to be mitigable by the City's Environmental Review Committee. Areas to be mitigated included traffic impacts, where the applicant was required to pay a $197 per trip mitigation fee; noise impacts from SR-167 where interior noise levels are to not exceed 50 dBA; user impacts, so that usable exterior recreational space will be provided; and storm water retention and treatment impacts, requiring on-site retention and treatment before being discharged into the P-9 channel. 4 . Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by: all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. The Traffic Engineering Division of the Public Works Department had concerns about traffic impacts and recommended a traffic impact assessment fee $188,741.47, and the Parks and Recreation and Building and Zoning Departments raised concerns about insufficient exterior open space or pedestrian linkages between buildings. The Policy Development and Building and Zoning Departments raised concerns about retaining sufficient right-of-way for the proposed future interchange at S.W. 27th Street and SR-167. 5. The subject proposal is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park. This site is also zoned M-P, Manufacturing Park, which requires a unified theme, substantial setbacks and landscaping for all new development. 6. The site plan as presented provides sufficient parking to comply with the Parking and Loading Ordinance of the City of Renton. The applicants are required to provide 284 spaces (5/1000 sq. ft. ) and are providing 284 spaces on site. 7. The Site Plan Review Ordinance lists ten general criteria which are to be considered in evaluating the acceptability of a site plan application. These include: (a) conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies. As noted above the subject proposal does comply with the land use designation shown on the Comp Plan for this area. Under the Urban Design Policies it states that: - "Ample landscaping should be provided throughout a developed site, including along property lines, to provide a pleasant environment, minimize the impact of development, and enhance the visual experience from adjacent properties, including hillsides. " and - "In addition, landscaped buffers should be established adjacent to public rights-of-way, between areas of incompatible land use, and along water channels and wildlife habitats. " Staff believe that the applicant could provide more extensive landscaping, including more trees at the rear of the proposed buildings to act as a landscape buffer between the proposed buildings and the SR-167 right-of- way. Staff are also recommending that the applicant provide clearly deliniated pedestrian walkways between the three proposed office buildings as well as between these buildings and the public sidewalk on East Valley Road. Site Plan Review C--nittee City of Renton •Report and Decision Page 3 Since the Valley Plan policies state the "provision of recreational opportunities should be an integral part of development in the Valley" and that "firms with large numbers of employees should develop outdoor recreation facilities", Staff are recommending that pursuant to the ERC recommendation, the applicant provide a minimum of 7,500 sq. ft. of usable recreational space on site for employees. This space should include some active space such as a basketball half, or practice court, and passive areas with benches and tables, as well as good solar exposure and noise protection. (b) Conformance with existing land use regulations; Staff review finds that the subject proposal does comply with the minimum lot area requirements of 35,000 sq. ft. and yard setbacks on lots less than 300 feet which is 20% of the depth of the lot measured perpendicular to the street. Portions of lots deeper than 300 feet are generally required to have a 60 foot setback. The zone has no height limit nor is there a limit on site coverage. (c) Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The mitigation measures adopted by the ERC address this criteria. The site is isolated and does not share a common property line with other private properties, except on the south, and if S.W. 27th Avenue is extended, the site will be completely isolated. (d) Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The subject proposal will be designed to minimize adverse impacts to the subject site. Mitigation measures imposed by the ERC as well as design refinements recommended in this report will minimize any significant adverse impacts this development may have. (e) Conservation of area-wide property values; The subject proposal is expected to be of sufficient quality that it will enhance property values in the immediate area. Design elements such as the sloped metal roofs on the buildings will make them look less industrial in character and are consistent with the campus like tone the M-P zoning is trying to achieve. (f) Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; As noted above, this is an area where improvements should be made. Staff are recommending that clearly deliniated pedestrian pathways be provided between all three i proposed buildings as well as between the buildings and sidewalk along East Valley Road. Crossings could be deliniated with decorative pavers or special stripping. (g) Provision of adequate light and air; Under existing conditions, there should be adequate light and air exposure to this development. Staff is somewhat concerned about whether a new interchange at S.W. 27th Street will reduce light and air to the south wing of Bldg. #3, not to mention, creating potential noise impacts. NOTE: The City is seeking a 45 foot wide reservation at the south end of the site for this proposed future development that was identified in the Valley Transportation Improvement Program. This reservation Site Plan Review C---nittee City of Renton -Report and Decision Page 4 would not only result in the loss of some 28 parking spaces but more importantly, place this new right-of-way within 20 feet of Bldg. #3 's south facade. (h) Mitigation of noise, odors, and other harmful or unhealthy . conditions; The subject proposal is not anticipated to create any unhealthy conditions itself. As noted above, noise from SR-167 and the future S.W. 27th. Street/SR-167 interchange could poise a problem to this development. The ERC anticipated this and required that interior noise levels measured at the window line not exceed 50 dBA. (i) Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and The site is served by an eight-inch sanitary sewer line and a twelve-inch water line, both along East Valley Road. (j) Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The three one-story buildings with their sloped roofs should not have a debilitating effect on the surrounding manufacturing park. With the retention of the sloping roofs, enhanced landscaping, pedestrian pathways, and recreational amenities that are recommended or have been required by the ERC, this project should enhance property values in the area. Conclusions: 1. The subject proposal is a development consistent with policies, specifications, and codes of the City of Renton. 2 . Specific issues raised by various City departments and focus on: a. Traffic impact mitigation; b. Adequacy of user open space and recreational facilities; c. Pedestrian circulation and safety; and d. Surface water runoff and its treatment. The applicant has agreed to the mitigation measures imposed by the Environmental Review Committee, and attached as an appendix to this report. 3 . The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park as well as the present zoning classification of Manufacturing Park (M-P) . 4. The subject proposal generally complies or could be made to comply with the general Site Plan Review Criteria contained in Section 4-738 (D) 1. 5. There has been no public opposition raised by neighboring property owners about the subject proposal which is generally believed to enhance property values in the area. Decision: The site plan, File No. SA-058-87, is subject to the following conditions: 1. The mitigation measures imposed by the Environmental Review Committee in their September 9, 1987, decision to issue a Determination . of Non-significance - Mitigated shall be satisfied; /� ,Site Plan Review C^miittee City of Renton , " .Report and Decision Page 5 2 . A bermed landscape strip shall be provided along East Valley Road to help screen parked cars in the front of the building as well as reduce noise intrusion from this arterial; 3 . Revised landscape plans showing the appropriate number, size, species and size of all shribs and trees shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the City's Landscape Architect showing lawned, common, passive recreational areas with benches and lunch tables for employee's benefit,. a recreational court and trees along the east edge of the site to create a visual buffer between SR-167 and the proposed new buildings; 4 . Exterior signage shall be designed to architecturally integrate with the proposed development rather than appear as an after thought and shall be approved by the City's Landscape Architect; and 5. The applicant shall submit revised elevations indicating the "as built" colors of all exterior surfaces prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. For the purpose of these decisions, the term "should" and "shall" are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" i- considered discretionary. ORDERED THIS 23rd day of November, 191111111111111 // V 11 DONALD K. ERICKSON, 1y For The Site Plan Review Committee TRANSMITTED THIS 25th day of November, 1987 to the parties of record: David L. Halinen Attorney At Law Suite 1000, Plaza Center Building 10900 Northeast Eighth Street Bellevue, WA. 98004 Dion Young Lance Mueller & Associates/Architects 130 Lakeside, Suite 250 Seattle, WA. 98122 Anita West Gary Merlino Construction Company 9125 - 10th Avenue South Seattle, WA.98108 TRANSMITTED THIS 23rd day of November, 1987, to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before 5: 00 P.M. December 7, 1987. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or' fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available prior to the meeting date of , 1987, may make a written request to Site Plan Review C^- ittee "City of Renton .Report and Decision` Page 6 the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of the decision, which is , 1987. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011 (B) (1) , which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on December 7th, 1987. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-markers in the land use process for site plan approvals include: (1) the Public Works Director, (2) the Building and Zoning Director, (3) The Policy Development Director, (4) the Hearing Examiner, and (5) members of the City Council. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Requests for Reconsideration as. well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. q ;., CITY OF RENTON ;f; BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 1, 1987 Lance Mueller & Associates; Bob Fadden & Dion Ybunh. 130 Ladeside Seattle, WA 98122 Subject: Environmental Review Committee Decision Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed please find a signed copy of the recent threshold determination of the Environmental Review Committee that was referred to in our previous correspondence. If you have any questions please call. ce yours, I Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:plp:p1021 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 ®® CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 1, 1987 ANMARCO 9125 10th Avenue South Seattle, W7a. 98108 Subject: Environmental Review Committee Decision Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed please find a signed copy of the recent threshold determination of the Environmental Review Committee that was referred to in our previous correspondence. If you have any questions please call. ce yours, r J Donald K. Erickson, AICP . Zoning Administrator DKE:plp:p1021 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 db tv CITY OF RENTON IMMOfr, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 1,1987 David L. Halinen Attorney at Law Plaza Center Building Suite 1000 10000 Northeast Eighth. Street Bellevue, WA 98004 Subject: Environmental Review Committee Decision Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed please find a signed copy of the recent threshold determination of the Environmental Review Committee that was referred to in our previous correspondence. If you have any questions please call. ce yours, /,, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:plp:p1021 r;> 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 - : I r---Sicinalized Intersect,"on at trade ST VALLEY HIGHWAY '-?:::r_ ' 1 I 1 li \//f r. i I /4 \ ''d• -------> i rl 1I‘ o 1/ \ o° - „. r \' � , S. W . /447 ° - / o. • _� `=� —- I - �-- . / i . • - ,c.. / • ? os I T2c--ttAK& �' % tz,voi: ;� /" �r ALii2�UAT� - t uoc7 .; ./" - ALTF12-k)Ara - — ASED o eU w/-1•K b l SG u-S5 to-- Mo2&had . - . .: --.:..:;..“ is :. �z� .• .�.••:..�---•:,.Y '�.:: 'DAV'ID L, HALINEN (206) 454-8272 ATTORNEY AT LAW Plaza Center Building CIC QE �ON Suite rf o � iogoo Northeast Eighth Street nBellevue,Washington 9800q SEP 1 J 19 / BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. September 14, 1987 City of Renton Environmental Review Committee HAND DELIVERED 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Motion for Reconsideration: Renton Campus Site Plan Approval and Environmental Review (Your Files ECF-053-87,SA-058-87) Dear Committee Members: I am in receipt of your letter of September 11, 1987 in which you outlined proposed mitigated conditions of approval and additional proposed site plan conditions. On behalf of the applicant, I hereby request reconsideration of your decision as follows: (1) Conditions 2 and 3 should be eliminated. As drafted, they deal not with noise impacts of the proposal but with noise from another project, existing SR 167. (2) Condition 4 should also be eliminated both because it is totally unrelated to any probable environmental impact of the subject proposal and because it is unrelated to any established SEPA policy of the City. (3) Condition 5 should be modified to read as follows: In order to mitigate stormwater impacts, one oil/water separator should be provided on- site.„ and at the time the P-9 Channel is constructed a biofiltering swale shall be introduced to meet the runoff before it enters the swale channel if the site's stormwater system discharges directly into the P-9 Channel . (Additional language underlined. ) '- CITY OF RENTON City of Renton R E C E I V E D LL J� Motion for Reconsideration PageerriJ1987 BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. This proposed modification would be consistent with comments made to me this afternoon during a phone conversation I had with Mr. Don Monaghan, P.E. of the City's Public Works Department. (4) Condition 7 should be eliminated because the City does not have authority to require this applicant to make a "contribution" to the City for future recreation and open space in the Valley. Additionally, no valid reason exists for requiring a public hearing under Renton Code Section 4-738 (c) 8. Instead, upon completion of environmental review, the site plan should simply be deemed approved pursuant to Section 4-738 (c) 10. Sincerely, David L. Halinen DLH:jsm cc: Mr. Donald Erickson Mr. Lawrence J. Warren, Esq. Mr. Gary Merlino Mr. Dion Young M' n • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-053-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-058-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for Site Plan Approval for two single story office buildings of 10, 000 sq. ft. and 17, 000 sq. ft. in Phase One and one single story 32, 120 sq. ft. office in Phase Two on a 5. 62 acre site. Project includes parking for 284 cars. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the East side of East Valley Highway North of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 Block of East Valley Road. PROPONENT: Gary Merlino LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen, (15) days from September 18, 1987. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. October 2, 1987 in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: September 9, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: September 18 , 19 7 r 7Z2 Ronald G. Nelson . Spri er Building and Zoning Director Poli evelo ent- Director Richard C. H ghton Public Works irector DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Renton Campus ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-053-87 APPLICATION NO. : SA-058-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for Site Plan Approval for two single story office buildings of 10, 000 sq. ft. and 17, 000 sq. ft. in Phase One and one single story 32, 120 sq. ft. office in Phase Two on a 5.62 acre site. Project includes parking for 284 cars. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the East side of East Valley Highway North of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 Block of East Valle CONDITIONS: 1. That the applicant pay $197. 00 per trip in traffic mitigation fees as assessment for the Valley Transportation Benefit District based upon an ITE standard of 17.7 trips per 1, 000 gross square feet of office area. This amount or portion thereof may be credited towards the eventual purchase of a 45 foot reservation of property along the southern property if this is determined to be needed in the future for roadway construction. • 2 . That noise impacts to the proposed office buildings be mitigated with the use of construction materials that will reduce the interior noise levels to no higher than more that 35 dBA. 3 . That the applicant use a combination of screening landscaping and berming together with insulated thermal type windows on the east side of the building and reduce noise impacts from the SR-167. 4 . That the applicant provide on site a minimum of 7, 500 sq. ft. of usable exterior recreation space for employees which could include a mixture of active and passive uses in a number of smaller spaces. Note to Applicant: That the applicant is advised to work with the Building and Zoning staff on the location of appropriate passive recreation areas for employees. 5. In order to mitigate stormwater impacts, one oil/water separator should be provided on-site and at the time the P-9 Channel is constructed a biofiltering swale shall be introduced to meet the runoff before it enters the swale channel. '` • ham' y(F Lc,. d ..1 y. 110 TAL Ec 4 , , 10 APPLICATION NO. ECF-053-87, SA-058-87 APPLICANT LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATESCRENTON CAMPUS ) PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW CON- STRUCTION OF 2 SINGLE STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS OF 10 000 SQ. FT. & 17, 500 SQ, FT. FOR PHASE I & A SINGLE STORY OFFICE BUILDING OF 32, 120 SQ, FT. FOR PHASE II TO INCLUDE PARKING FOR 284 CARS, GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS LOCATED ON THE EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY NORTH OF S.W. 27TH STREET AT THE 2300 - 2700 BLOCK OF EAST VALLEY ROAD. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIR •NMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION • DOES r! DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL ►#1 WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE ATE BELOW COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY ,Tb8EA 4 � y AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ENVIRONMEN iAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON- Audrey Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath statesing SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED for the follow that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Renton project(s)MuniunderlC the The Applicant(s) of s Municipal Code. App ( ) have completed a mitigation process pursu- ant to WAC 197-11- 50. VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATED RENTON CAMPUS Application for site plan approval to allow Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers construction of two single story office build are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six ings of 10,000 sq. ft. and 17,500 sq. ft. for Phase 1 and a single story office building of months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published 32,120 square feet for Phase II project to in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King include parking for 284 cars. Property locat- County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal ed on the East Valley Highway North of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 block of newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for East Valley Road. File Nos.: ECF-053-87, King County. SA-058-87. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Department, Municipal Building, Renton, , Renton Edition �; , Auburn Edition (and not in Washington,befiled235-25 with Any appeal of Rofenton ERC action must filed the City of Renton supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Hearing Examiner by October 1, 1987. during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Published in the Valley Daily News Sep- tember 18, 1987. R2513 Notice of knvirenmentAl Determination was published on September 16, 1967 R22_513 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ .(15 • Subscribed and sworn to before me i22nd day of Sept 19 87 Note ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, CITY King County, Washington. ��"� F RENTOIV I )) � 11 v e VDN#87 Revised 11 86 l (�, l98'7' 8�� E�;G ZONING DEPT, NotEnvDet/Dskl ECF05387 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATED RENTON CAMPUS Application for site plan approval to allow construction of two single-story office buildings of 10, 000 sq. ft. and 17,500 sq. ft. for Phase 1 and a single story office building of 32,120 square feet for Phase II project to include parking for 284 cars. Property located on the East Valley Highway North of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 block of East Valley Road. File Nos. : ECF-053-87, SA-058-87. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2540. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by October 1, 1987. Published: September 18, 1987 mo 4 CITY OF RENTON F .`f' BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director September 11, 1987 Gary Merlino ANMARCO 9125 10th Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98108 RE: Renton Campus Site Approval and Environmental Review (Files ECF-053-87, SA-058-87) Dear Mr. Merlino: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of your Site Approval request for property located on the east side of East Valley Highway North of S.W. 27th, Street at the 2300-2700 Block of East Valley Road. The Committee on August 31, 1987, decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated with the following mitigation conditions for those impacts which individually or collectively could have a significant environmental impact: 1. That the applicant pay $197 . 00 per trip in traffic mitigation fees as assessment for the Valley Transportation Benefit District based upon an ITE standard of 17 .7 trips per 1, 000 gross square feet of office area. This amount or portion thereof may be credited towards the eventual purchase of a 45 foot reservation of property along the southern property if this is determined to be needed in the future for roadway construction. 2 . That noise impacts to the proposed office buildings be mitigated with the use of construction materials that will reduce the interior noise levels to no higher than more that 35 dBA. 3 . That the applicant use a combination of screening landscaping and berming together with insulated thermal type, windows on the east side of the building and reduce noise impacts from the SR-167. 4 . That the applicant provide on site a minimum of 7, 500 sq. ft. of usable exterior recreation space for employees which could include a mixture of active and passive uses in a number of smaller spaces. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Ga.ry Merl ino • September 11, 1987 Page 2 Note to Applicant: That the applicant is advised to work with the Building and Zoning staff on the location of appropriate passive recreation areas for employees. 5. In order to mitigate stormwater impacts, one oil/water separator should be provided on-site and at the time the P-9 Channel is constructed a biofiltering swale shall be introduced to meet the runoff before it enters the swale channel. In addition to the above mitigation conditions the Environmental Review Committee is seeking the following which it _believes are necessary for site plan approval: 6. That the south forty-five feet of the property be reserved for the City because of the anticipated widening of S.W. 27th Street. 7. That the applicant work with the Parks and Recreation staff on the appropriate amount of a contribution to the Parks and Recreation Department for future recreation and open space in the Valley. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee' s decision. The comment period will end September 29, 1987. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination 'unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. Appeals are made to the City's Hearing Examiner. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2540 and ask for myself or Betty Grimshaw. Fox the Environm r a Rev' w Committee, 1: :14A/ Don . Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:BG I �o i CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director September 11, 1987 Bob Fadden and Dion Young Lance Mueller & Associates 130 Lakeside, Suite 250 Seattle, WA 98122 RE: Renton Campus Site Approval and Environmental Review (Files ECF-053-87, SA-058-87) Dear Messrs. Fadden and Young: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of your Site Approval request for property located on the east side of East Valley Highway North of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 Block of East Valley Road. The Committee on August 31, 1987, decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated with the following mitigation conditions for those impacts which individually or collectively could have a significant environmental impact: 1. That the applicant pay $197. 00 per trip in traffic mitigation fees as assessment for the Valley Transportation Benefit District based upon an ITE standard of 17.7 trips per 1, 000 gross square feet of office area. This amount or portion thereof may be credited towards the eventual purchase of a 45 foot reservation of property along the southern property if this is determined to be needed in the future for roadway construction 2 . That noise impacts to the proposed office buildings be mitigated with the use of construction materials that will reduce the interior noise levels to no higher than more that 35 dBA. 3 . That the applicant use a combination of screening landscaping and berming together with insulated thermal type windows on the east side of the building and reduce noise impacts from the SR-167. 4 . That the applicant provide on site a minimum of 7, 500 sq. ft. of usable exterior recreation space for employees which could include a mixture of active and passive uses in a number of smaller spaces. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 • r Bob Fadden and Dior Dung September 11, 1987 Page 2 Note to Applicant: That the applicant is advised to work with the Building and Zoning staff on the location of appropriate passive recreation areas for employees. 5. In order to mitigate stormwater impacts, one oil/water separator should be provided on-site and at the time the P-9 Channel is constructed a biofiltering swale shall be introduced to meet the runoff before it enters the swale channel. In addition to the above mitigation conditions the Environmental Review Committee is seeking the following which it believes are necessary for_ site plan approval: 6. That the south forty-five feet of the property be reserved for the City because of the anticipated widening of S.W. 27th Street. 7. That the applicant work with the Parks and Recreation staff on the appropriate amount of a contribution to the Parks and Recreation Department for future recreation and open space in the Valley. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end September 29, 1987. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. Appeals are made to the City's Hearing Examiner. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2540 and ask for myself or Betty Grimshaw. For the Environm al evie Committee, d Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:BG CITY OF R,ENTON ma ; ` #, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director September 11, 1987 David L. Halinen, Attorney Plaza Center Building, Suite 1000 10900 Northeast Eighth Street Bellevue, WA 98004 RE: Renton Campus Site Approval and Environmental Review (Files ECF-053-87, SA-058-87) Dear Mr. Merlino: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of your Site Approval request for property located on the east side of East Valley Highway North of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 Block of East Valley Road. The Committee on August 31, 1987, decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated with the following mitigation conditions for those impacts which individually or collectively could have a significant environmental impact: 1. That the applicant pay $197. 00 per trip in traffic mitigation fees as assessment for the Valley Transportation Benefit District based upon an ITE standard of 17.7 trips per 1, 000 gross square feet of office area, to be credited towards the eventual purchase of a 45 foot reservation of property along the southern property if this is determined to be needed in the future for roadway construction. 2 . That noise impacts to the proposed office buildings be mitigated with the use of construction materials that will reduce the interior noise levels to no higher than more that 35 dBA. 3 . That the applicant use a combination of screening landscaping and berming together with insulated thermal type windows on the east side of the building and reduce noise impacts from the SR-167. 4 . That the applicant provide on site a minimum of 7,500 sq. ft. of usable exterior recreation space for employees which could include a mixture of active and passive uses in a number of smaller spaces. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Gary Merlino • September 11, 1987 Page 2 Note to Applicant: That the applicant is advised to work with the Building and Zoning staff on the location of appropriate passive recreation areas for employees. 5. In order to mitigate stormwater impacts, one oil/water separator should be provided on-site and at the time the P-9 Channel is constructed a biofiltering swale shall be introduced to meet the runoff before it enters the swale channel . In addition to the above mitigation conditions the Environmental Review Committee is seeking the following which it believes are necessary for site plan approval: 6. That the south forty-five feet of the property be reserved for the City because of the anticipated widening of S.W. 27th Street. 7 . That the applicant work with the Parks and Recreation staff on the appropriate amount of a contribution to the Parks and Recreation Department for future recreation and open space in the Valley. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end September 29, 1987. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it' s Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. Appeals are made to the City's Hearing Examiner. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2540 and ask for myself or Betty Grimshaw. Fo a Environmr a Rev' w Committee, :1.44/ Don ' . r Erickson, , AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:BG 41, CITY OF RENTON `I 1 r' �� *,, Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Daniel Kellogg - David M. Dean -Mark E. Barber - Zanetta L. Fontes -Theodore R. Parry Assistant City Attorneys September 3 , 1987 CMY C.-: RENTON i - 0,1 ,`11 Mr . David L. Halinen �1 lS S r'k 9 8 7 LrrJ Attorney at Law DEPT. Plaza Center Building, Suite 1000 BUILDING / 7.01G 10900 Northeast Eighth Street Bellevue , Washington 98004 Re : Renton Environmental Review Committee - AnMarCo ' s Proposal ��-- 096_8" Dear Mr . Halinen: I am in receipt of your letter dated September 1, 1987 asking for the City' s authorization to place certain environmental conditions upon your client ' s property. You refer in your letter to both a site plan review and environmental review. If we are speaking of environmental review under SEPA, then the City must consider the traffic as part of the built environment under WAC Section 197-11-444 (2 ) ( c) . The City also has the right to implement SEPA policies. As you probably know, the City has an interim policy concerning traffic in the Valley area . That policy charges a trip generation fee to build certain necessary traffic improvements. One of the necessary traffic improvements is S.W. 27th. In order to build S.W. 27th a portion of your client' s property would have to be acquired by the City . Since that is an existing policy and plan, I believe that qualifies as a SEPA condition. The review by staff would indicate that no damage to your client' s plan would occur because of this reservation. If and when the City saw its way clear to develop S .W. 27th, the City might eliminate certain parking from your client' s site, and of course would have to pay just compensation at that time . With respect to site plan review, if that has occurred, the exact purpose of site plan review is to locate the transportation amenities, curb cuts, landscaping, etc . so that the site will conform with the City ' s future plans and will fit in to the general neighborhood. A condition of reservation for future public right-of-way would be exactly the type of purpose to be served by a condition on site plan review. Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 ,. ., i Mr . David L. Halinen September 3, 1987 Page 2 Your client will be required to pay certain traffic mitigation fees. It might be to your client' s advantage to negotiate with the City concerning terms of payment of that fee . It could be that we could defer the payment until such time as the City makes an election whether or not to acquire this parcel of property. This would defer the payment of your client' s money for a period of time and , if the City decided to proceed , result in a dedication of land in lieu of payment of money. As I am sure you are aware, the traffic problems in the Valley are severe . Unless the City has a coherent plan to remedy the situation, each property owner will be required to mitigate their individual traffic impacts. In a number of situations that may be impossible and could result in a denial of building permits. I have no knowledge as to whether or not your client' s property would fall into that category . Additionally, if adequate means of ingress and egress to the Valley are not provided, all of the property values in the Valley will be depreciated as will the value of any improvements on the property. It would appear in the best interest of both of our clients for us to work toward a full understanding of the conditions imposed by the ERC and determine if there are any further or collateral agreements necessary to protect both parties . Very truly yours , Lawrence J. Warren LJW:nd cc : Mayor Environmental Review Committee Council Members N8. 11: 1 a DAVID L. HALINEN (206) 454-8272 ATTORNEY AT LAW D Plaza Center Building D Suite root �---�- rogoo Northeast Eighth Street Bellevue,Washington 980o4 SEP 1987 WARREN &KELLOGG By September 1, 1987 HAND DELIVERED Mr. Lawrence Warren, City Attorney City of Renton c/o Warren & Kellogg 100 S. 2nd Renton, WA 98057 RE: Action of the Renton Environmental Review Committee with respect to AnMarCo's "Renton Campus" Site Plan Review Application - Dear Mr. Warren: I represent Gary Merlino and AnMarCo with respect to AnMarCo's planned construction of an office development on its property at East Valley Road and S.W. 27th Street. Ron Nelson informed me this afternoon that the ERC plans to issue a written decision this Friday that would condition site plan approval upon the grant of a "reservation" to the City over a portion of AnMarCo's property for future construction of freeway ramps at S.W. 27th Street. Since the State Environmental Policies Act does not authorize such a condition in the circumstances of AnMarCo's proposal, would you please let me know upon what authority the ERC will be relying in issuing this decision? Your timely response would be appreciated. S 'ncerely, avid L. Hahne DLH:jsm cc: Mr. Gary Merlino DAVID L. HALINEN /v (206) 454-$272 ATTORNEY AT LAW �' Plaza Center Building Suite i000 logo°Northeast Eighth Street Bellevue,Washington 98004 CITY OF f ENTON September 1, 1987 1:7 0 HWT P``f1 Mr. Ronald B. Nelson, Director C�,� �$ City of Renton Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South L i�ILDriG/ZONING DEPT. Renton, Washington 98055 ARE: Renton Campus ,. M. r r. Nelson: With respect to the point I made this afternoon about the old Fill and Grade Special Permit decision for the Merlino site not mandating a public hearing for the Renton Campus site plan review, I have enclosed the relevant pages of the Examiner's Report and Recommendation under SP-062-77 . Please note that in Conclusion No. 6 on page four of the Examiner's report, the Examiner merely pointed out what Renton Code Section 4-2303 .2 .0 then required. At the time, the Code required a public hearing regarding the "final uses and site plan" . Now, however, Section 4-2303 .2C only requires "site plan review as established in Section 4-738" . Since Section 4-738 does not now require a public hearing for this project (see especially Section 4-738 (c) 8) , the Examiner's Report in SP-062-77 does not require one either. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please give me a call. 57ere27David Lalinen DLH:jsm cc: Mr. Gary Merlino 4 Q C49- --G - ? 41,vcl W1.4,6$200--1- n U , .... _ OFFICE OF INE LAND USE HEARING; F) - .R CJTll �� ‘. _ CITY OF REPITOii ? 'vrON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (1 _ ., IV APPLICANT: Gary Merlino FILE NO. SP-062-77 "'-.a) 2 11 LOCATION: Property located at 2900 East Valley Road just north 'oriLf.ds, the existing lumber market between East Valley Road and iG/ZL1NII�G DEPT SR-167. The site is also south of the existing Seattle Water Department Bow Lake Pipeline and Olympic Pipeline right-of-way. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests special permit pursuant to the City's Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance to allow filling f of approximately 20,000 cubic yards of material within a 'tea 5.75 acre site. The subject request is considered the CO initial step in preparing the property for future ..-7-1 commercial or industrial development. Q SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to conditions. 1\7 RECOMMENDATION: rV Hearing Examiner: Approval subject to conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the '� REPORT: Examiner on August 23, 1977. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining' available information on file with the application, and--- field checking the property and surrounding area, the w Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on August 30, 1977, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Bui),ding. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. • It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed • the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit N1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit $1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit H2: Assessor's Map Exhibit 113: Engineered Fill Map Including Cross Sections Exhibit M4: Resolution No. 1923 (reference only) Exhibit fi5: Documents from Soil Conservation Service (on file with Planning Department - reference only) Exhibit 116: Memorandum from Hearing Examiner to Planning Director and Public Works Director, dated August 24, 1977, and respective responses, dated August 25, 1977 and 1 August 26, 1977. 1 Mr. Smith submitted an addition to Exhibit k1 and statud that the maximum slope shall be no greater than two to one as per ordinance requirements. In response to the Examiner's inquiry regarding dimensions of the P-9 channel at the northern end of the subject property, Mr. Smith clarified the boundaries on the map, Exhibit 03, stating that although a discrepancy exists in the dimensions, it would be resolved by the King County Hydraulics Division. In response to the Examiner's inquiry regarding requirements for 2% of property ' retained for landscaping suitable for wildlife habitat, Mr. Smith reported that property located within the P-9 channel would be included in the requirement and additional landscaping, if required, would be in the form of exterior boundary __ landscaping around the site to flow properly into the development Scheme and would I' be accomplished at the time of development. • av-e P P.e. four .. 19. No oppositi �s expressed to some landfill occurring !r. - way of the 1 Valley -.. the public right-of- Road; however, this landfill lies within the purview of the Public Works Department. • 20. Some of the existing landfill material is concrete and debris which does not conform to Section 4-2316. 21. Section 4-2314 requires a 10-foot setback of the tops of slopes from the building setback line (see attached memorandum dated August 30, 1977 from the Examiner and legal opinion from the City Attorney dated August 31, 1977). CONCLUSIONS. 1. The proposal generally conforms to the Green River Comprehensive Plan with the exception that wildlife habitat must be provided on the site. It appears that the requirement of 2% of the site to be wildlife habitat can be accomplished within the area designated for the P-9 drainage channel. Any additional area needed can be taken from the perimeter via landscaping during final development. The Planning Department has on file several documents (Exhibit M5) outlining ' the landscaping materials for wildlife habitat. • 2. Section 4-2303.2.B. requires that the Examiner conclude that the fill activity "...not be unreasonably detrimental to the surrounding area." Based upon the evidence submitted in the public hearing and the physical characteristics of the site, the proposed landfill is compatible with and similar to existing landfill operations in the immediate vicinity. Since the operation will occur in a drainage area, some restrictions are necessary to control erosion, mitigate loss of wildlife habitat, and facilitate storm water drainage. These conditions will make the Special Permit not detrimental to adjacent properties and the surrounding area. 3. The P-9 drainage channel should be preserved in its existing natural condition to maximize drainage effectiveness. A 2 to 1 slope should be maintained on the fill (Section 4-2316.7), and this slope should be Stabilized by hydroseeding (Section 4-2312.10). 4. Fill material should be inspected periodically by the Public Works Department for conformance to Section 4-2316. Existing fill material should be inspected for conformance to Section 4-2316. 5. Drainage of storm water that will accumulate atop the fill must conform to the standards under the jurisdiction of the Public Works Department. A drainage plan was not submitted as part of the application nor at the public hearing. However, the drainage plan can be resolved by,the applicant with the Public Works Department prior to issuance of the Special Permit. Since the fill operation will occur sporadically, the Department should establish specific criteria and procedures to control storm water drainage and erosion responsive to this type of irregular operation. A part of this procedure should be hydroseeding of the landfill except where existing vegetation is retained. 6. Per Section 4-2303.2.0 the final uses and site plan must be approved by the( Examiner. A public hearing will be required and the Examiner must conclude that, the uses and site plan conform to the Comprehensive Plan and are compatible with' • the vicinity as well as applicable zoning requirements.L 7. Sufficient access exists via the East Valley Road and SR-167. The stated maximum, 15 trucks per day, can be adequately accommodated on these roads. 8. The applicant is aware of the possible requirement of making the floor elevation of future buildings at the 21.8 foot elevation (or as established through the current study by the Soil Conservation Service). This requirement lies within the jurisdiction of the King County Hydraulics Division and not the City of Renton. 9. Dust and mud control as recommended by the Public Works Department and accepted by the applicant is sufficient to meet the requirement of Section 4-2312.8. 10. The additional setback requirement of Section 4-2314 does not apply where slopes do not occur as in the proposed fill abutting and meeting the grade of the existing fill along the south property line. But in instances where slopes occur, the required 10-foot setback must be measured from the building setback.lines (see • attached memoranda). This impacts the proposal in requiring a total of 10-foot setbacks from the west, north and east property lines since no building Setbacks are required in L-1 (Section 4-712). Chapters 23 and 30 do not provide the Examiner with the authority to reduce this setback requirement. i } ":WIDL. HALINEN (206) 454-8272 'iTTORNEY AT LAW Plaza Center Building { Suite i000 �`9TY ,' ��.�� logo°Northeast Eighth Street Bellevue,Washington 98004 it ICI Q MI� 1 August 5, 1987 I` 7 Mr. Richard C. Houghton Director of Public Works {. City of .Renton BUILDING /ZOI i NG NFL 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: The Merlino "Renton Campus" Site Plan Review Dear Mr. Houghton: Thank you for having the Environmental Checklist Review Sheets for the Traffic Division and the Engineering Division corrected. They are now more closely in accord with your earlier summary of the Public Works Department position with respect to the subject project proposal. Please note two other matters. First, if you have not done so already, I would like you to make one more Review Sheet correc- tion. Please have comment 1 on the Engineering Division's Environmental Checklist Review Sheet changed to read: "Drainage easement needed for P-9 channel. " As we discussed and agreed to earlier, conveyance of an easement will be consistent with both the proposed Renton Campus project and the City's future P-9 channel project, while conveyance of right-of-way will leave the Renton Campus site short of necessary square footage. Second, as we have also discussed, a public hearing is not required by the City Code for this site plan review. Since the issue of whether or not a public hearing should be held will be determined by the Environmental Review Committee, I would appreciate it if you would point out to the other committee members that none of the conditions specified in the Site Plan Review Ordinance calling for a public hearing have been met. (Those conditions are listed in Renton Code Section 4-738 (c) , a copy of which is enclosed. ) With reference to those specific conditions, a public hearing should not be required because: 1) No significant unresolved issues are raised by the proposal; 2) The applicant has not requested a public hearing; and 3) The proposed project does not exceed: (i) 100 multi-family residential units (it is not residential at all) ; (ii) 100, 000 square feet of gross floor area in the Valley Planning .area (less than 60,000 square feet are X !II proposed) ; (iii) four stories or 60 feet in height (the proposed buildings are only one story) ; - (iv) 300 parking stalls (only 284 parking stalls are proposed) ; and (v) 10 acres in size (the project site consists of only 5.6 acres) . Also in regard to the public hearing issue, please note that the existing special permit for filling and grading on the site SP- 062-77 does not require a public hearing on this site plan propo- sal. While in Conclusion 6 on page 4 of the Hearing Examiner's Report of September 12, 1977, the Examiner did conclude that a public hearing before the Examiner was required, he did so because, at that time, the Section 4-738 site plan review requirements that were specified by Section 4-2303.2.c required it. Now, however, Section 4-738 site plan review does not require it. Thank you for your attention to these matters. Please phone me if you have any questions. S 'ncerely, A , V641-124-1 r David L. alinen DLH:dmm Enclosure cc: Gary Merlino Dion Young, Lance Mueller & Associates 4-738 i 4-. Md 4-738 . ' it • C,4) signs placed on or near the subject property and clearly visible from the largest 1.public street serving the property and a public notice mailed to all adjacent i property owners at the applicant's expense.:The applicant shall be responsible_ I ' for providing completed mailing labels and postage. ("Adjacent" shall mean i all contiguous properties, with the assumption that railroads and public rights of way, except limited access roads, do not exist.) The notices shall state the nature and location of the proposed development, the public approvals that • • %,',:+ s are required, and the opportunities for public comment. A fourteen (14) day r T is public.comment period shall be provided prior to any final action by the City on a site plan application, whether or not a public hearing is required. I, ,4 5. Comments from the reviewing departments shall be made in writing within. Ifourteen (14) days. Unless a ro osed site plan is subsequently modified, the •',• i ', recommendations of the reviewing departments shall constitute the comments of the respective departments with regard to the proposed site plan. li. Lack of comment from a department shall be considered a recommendation for approval of the proposed site plan. However, all departments reserve the • 3, / ':• right to make later comments of a code compliance nature during buildinger- 1 • t R ihV.� p mit review. This includes such requirements as exact dimensions, specifics- �;. tions or any other requirement specifically detailed in the City Code. ta f: i, 6. After the departmental comment period, the Building and Zoning Depart- ment shall notify the applicant of a p` pany negative comments or conditions recom- gi; mended by the departments. When significant issues are raised, this notifica- • I a, tion should also normally involve a meeting between the applicant and IA •lij appropriate City representatives. The applicant shall have the opportunity to t {; respond to the notification either by submitting a revised site plan application, `';. by submitting additional information, or by stating in writing why the recom- ;t mendations are considered unreasonable or not acceptable. ,w. 7. Whenever a revised site plan or new information is received from an a li- ;;; cant, the Building and Zoning Department may re-circulate the application to •concerned departments. Consulted departments shall respond in writing within ,;;,;; ten (10) days with any additional comments. In general, the City's environmental • '` determination of significance or non-signficance pursuant to Title IV, Chapter i ,: 28 will not be issued until after final departmental comments on the site plan ;. or revised site plan are received. 8. Upon receipt of final departmental comments and after the close of the public comment period, the Environmental Review Committee shall determine the n necessity for a public hearing on the site plan application.A public hearing before the Hearing Examiner shall be required if: tj`:, rt (a) The Environmental Review Committee determines that based on P - departmental comments or public input there are significant p that are raised by the proposal; or unresolved concerns ;r: ,.; (b) The applicant has requested a public hearing; or �' r t, :••v ' "` (c) The' proposed project is larger than any one of-'X.}r Yf` the following: ° ..,f..1:.,. 1,41,, 'F - one hundred (100) multiple family residential units; �' • i t. !,i. .., l! . a. 4-738 .�. A 4-738' \ • • C,8,c) - One hundred thousand 1100,000) square feet of gross floor area in t the M-P Zone or other zones in the Valley Planning Area; - i si - Twenty-five thousand (25,000) square feet of gross floor area in the i. ',i : B-1, O-P, or P-1 Zones outside the Valley Planning Area; :'i - four (4) stories or sixty feet (60') in height; '' i - three hundred (300) parking stalls; or . L - ten (10) acres in size. i:..F • 7 1 , 9. Whenever a public hearing is required, the Building and Zoning Department shall coordinate with the Hearing Examiner in setting a hearing date for the .; site plan application. After conducting at least one public hearing on the site .: plan application, the Hearing Examiner shall render a written decision pursuant • to the provisions of Title IV, Chapter 30. The time limits of Title IV, Chapter 30 shall apply. In all cases, the public hearing for site plan review should be conducted concurrently with any other required hearing, such as rezone or sub- ;`l• division, if the details of the development are sufficiently defined to permit adequate review. 10. When the Environmental Review Committee determines that a p 9 ublic hearin ,"` r is not required, the proposed site plan shall be deemed approved, subject to any environmental mitigating measures that may be a part of the City's declare- t:.1 tion of significance or nonsignificance. (D) Site Plan Review Criteria: The Hearing Examiner and City staff shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with . any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, • but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to discourage creativity and innovation. The site plan review criteria include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. General Criteria: (a) Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; (b) Conformance with existing land use regulations; (c) Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; ' (d) Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; - (e) Conservation of area-wide property values; (f) Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; (g) Provision of adequate light and air; • 480 11 Staff Report/Dsk ERC BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT August 12, 1987 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Lance Mueller & Associates PROJECT: Renton Campus ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-053-87 APPLICATION NO'S: SA-058-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for Site Plan Approval for two single story office buildings of 10, 000 sq. ft. and 17, 000 sq. ft. in Phase One and one single story 32, 120 sq. ft. office in Phase Two on a 5. 62 acre site. Project includes parking for 284 cars. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the East side of East Valley Highway North of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 Block of East Valley Road. B. ANALYSIS: The subject site is an elongated 244, 963 sq. ft. site wedged in between SR- 167 and East Valley Highway. It is currently zoned Manufacturing Park (M-P) , which allows a wide variety of industrial, transportation, service and office activities which "meet high operational, development and environmental standards. " offices are a principal use in this zone and site plan approval is required for all development, regardless of size, in it. The minimum lot area in this zone is 35, 000 sq. ft. and yard setback on lots less than 300 feet is 20% of the depth of the lot measured perpendicular to the street. Portions of lots deeper than 300 feet are generally required to have a 60 foot setback. The zone has no Lance Mueller & Associates - pg. 2 height limit nor is there a limit on site coverage. Because of its proximity to SR-167, noise from passing traffic is also considered to have major impacts if not adequately mitigated. The 1219 foot long site is virtually filled at this time (this was done under an earlier 1977 grade and fill permit) and formerly was a wetland. The applicants intend to maintain a + 9, 000 sq. ft. wildlife habitat in the future P-9 right-of-way. Surface waters are to be run through a oil/water separator before being discharged into the future P-9 channel. Staff believe that a vio-filtering swale should be introduced at the north end of the site in the area designated as a wildlife habitat. It would be very desirable to implement such a swale now since they are considered (when properly designed and sized) to be more effective than oil/water separators in treating surface water runoff. C. ISSUES: * Whether there are adequate utilities to serve the site? * Whether noise impacts from SR-167 and East Valley Road can be mitigated to create a humane working environment for the project's estimated ± 300 employees? * Whether there are adequate recreational and other support services for future employees on or nearby the site? * Whether sufficient provision has been made for pedestrian circulation on site between buuildings as well as between buildings, parking areas, and adjacent streets? D: RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That the north eighty (80) feet of the site be put in a reservation, dedication or easement for drainage and wildlife purposes. 2 . That the applicant pay a traffic assessment fee of $188,741.47 as assessment for the Valley i Lance Mueller & Associates - page 3 Transportation Benefit District based upon an ITE standard OF 17.7 trips per 1, 000 gross square feet of office area. 3 . That the applicant use a combination of screening landscaping and berming together with insulated thermal type windows on the east side of the building and reduce noise impacts from the SR-167. 4. That the applicant provide on site a minimum of 7, 500 sq. ft. of usable exterior recreation space for employees which could include a mixture of active and passive uses in a number of smaller spaces. 5. That the applicant work with the Parks and Recreation staff on the appropriate amount of a contribution to the Parks and Recreation Department for future recreation and open space in the Valley. 6. In order to mitigate stormwater impacts, one oil/water separator should be provided on-site and at the time the P-9 Channel is constructed a biofilteriny swale shall be introduced to meet the runoff before it enters the swale channel. 7. That the applicant is advised to work with the Building and Zoning staff on the location of appropriate passive recreation areas for employees. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: No significant traffic impacts. Fire PreventionBureau: Probable minor impact noted for Public Services with no further comment. Design Engineering: More information requested on Water and Land and Shoreline Use. Probable minor impacts noted for all other environmental elements. The following comments were made.: Lance Mueller & Associates - page 4 1. Right of Way needed for P-9 Channel. 2 . Install offsite improvements (sidewalks) 3. Storm sewer connections should not be in P-9 Right of Way. Traffic Engineering: Probable major impacts noted for transportation and probable minor impacts noted for all other environmental elements. The following comments were made: 1. All driveway widths to be 30 feet 2 . Assessment for Valley Transportation Benefit District: Office trip rate & cost : 17.7 X 56,720 1, 000 X $188 = $188, 741. 47 Utility Engineering: Probable minor impacts noted for Public Services and Utilities with no further comment. Parks and Recreation: Note: The following comments are primarily site plan review rather than environmental impact oriented. Probable major impacts noted for Aesthetics and Recreation. The following comments were made: 1. Renton Campus. .The name conjures up images of grassy areas and walkways, but unfortunately the site plan for the Renton Campus fails to live up to its name. 2 . There are no grassy areas and the pedestrian circulation on the site needs improvement. This site needs outside seating areas and they should be designed so that the buildings act as a buffer between them and the high noise levels of SR 167. 3 . The sidewalk needs landscape buffering from the traffic on East Valley Highway. 4. Buildings #2 and #3 need a well defined pedestrian Lance Mueller & Ascociates - page 5 link accentuated with landscaping. Building Division: Probable minor impact noted for Earth, Housing, and Aesthetics with no further comment. Zoning Division: 1. Should a pedestrian plaza be incorporated into the development for the employees of the complex? The project should include at a minimum, some tables and outdoor seating areas. 2 . Can the pedestrian circulation in the site be improved? There is no sidewalk circulation between the buildings or to different areas of the same building. All walkways currently lead from the buildings door's to the parking lot. Policy Development: More information necessary for Earth Water, Plants, Animals, Land and Shoreline Use, Recreation and Transportation. Probable minor impacts noted for all other environmental elements. The following comments were made: 1. Is the fill permit SP- 062-77 still valid? (No. 2 years maximum) 2 . Linkages should be established between this site , P-1, P-9 and Panther Creek wetlands including adequate buffering, integration with a trails network and landscaping. (Pedestrian linkages?) 3 . The M-P zone requires a unified theme, substantial setbacks and landscaping. Does this proposal adaquately meet these requirements? (Not an environmental impact - rather site plan/zoning related. ) 4 . It is this department's understanding that the southern portion of this property will be utilized by Lance Mueller & Associates - page 6 the City to construct SW 27th Street and an interchange on SR 167 . How will this affect the applicant's project? (Public Works has stated that this site is not needed for such a future development. ) . . -.-- -7.70.0fA•U.,, .. 7:.";_.•',, :/.1 '- 1.4t *-1,7-17,47.- _•:-..--77,.. 77. --.77 ''-'1 , * ` : 41' -2,,, S ‘.'„.--..,, iii Ill._ • 4-1f If iN". -......-....3141/ • •1. '''.:4 \ ,. rifft%V.0.(1 ....i i .I! I .„,,, / • ) .;r i .. m 7,-.. Ki •-•"- . • Iii` - : 0-\".- -11.:?!1'L'')! NNW y_Lcu_N)-c,:,y_ ,eE„_ I 11241.1.•I,25641, • f 1.3.223:211. } . 1 - I t 4.rat.22.eartfraeff.fpotter flu2 sorttsst1.2•2122.422212.9. 1 22=012 22 WTI.22,ft If.11.lo Sfq 22.242.111211.222,1212,.1.27 ) 12 On meal fff2012f 2212arl MU DIC.31 DD.II 22,1 entorly ef al 2111 22r2i•42 Ca Gm talky 11112,62221 Oa Larrfa 141. • 7 i 1 eV,I ,_-r, , . ry...1.."..14 4. 1.44.14•14,44e.C.44...044W-A t ra.,.....4.ova...pt., op..,•0.- 07707 7 771•00•11.t.•re77,71,00, 0 i70 7 7 rf....,,,,A=.0...7.•00.4777 707•7•••••••• . ' . . 7 • --- ------ ! 7 c - ------------------------ ' ----- ; ___----------------- , ...-- 11 . • -.--------------------- --- — --- ---- -- --- •E‘ -••- t . .------t13-1-61 - - C)- L I _ _-- 'A- - •, ‘\ , ,S. ; .. ffTry I .-------------------------„ - _ J __ mrwersiggi (-) ---S `j 1 e _ _--- _ --------------- I • ----- I.• I .4771,1/7 o00{001, .............--'.........-1.........!_..-.--: t, -.1" \ ..I.V.0.4.4.0 4 7•00(,..,07.:0,.-0.71,••• , `;,........„)+0-,r...;',7,,,,,r.4ET.,:t. ____.,-.7_, —__. r---- ——ri F-'211- i. .... Li.ti •0.._ , • tgraglant i . ---------Tir:':111-T- ---' , ; 0'.,,*00 0,• p -::: , a ,--... r q :r-r.--r • 1•00.,,,c.f„, —.• ---r Li.. i :' -td; 11" ' 1"--l' • 4 , 1 is..,_,,r_r‘.. --;—, l'S --P---- ,----, I IT I 1 i I 1 i 1 • II-11-1111H111111 ...frx."777.7777.07. -IC - _ ---- _ ! . ....1 I -1.1. Clt.4.42 .*I-• ' r 7 Fr-ITT- ' 1 !ir ,..TuIti_niiiii.:iiill_n_Lii!,, i ! il -7'-7---t .: q. ',, ,,:;, -,,, . ' •- ' ..-t- ______ , ---} -1------ __ _ ... v7.9.70,_j:_.7- . .7) \.... _,.• _ .A .___.__,_.__.,_,______________) -t_ 9 a I ,,'•,' - _ 03 L.......-.0....70704••• EAaLVALLEY ROAD . Pe.„0.7,,..e.I.•70-6771070e7,A rv,d 1 I'M 0 • • --313- H • 1.01941.4t-11,--1,..A...i.e-f O-. 1•17.1 toter--1 ------. ',.',1 r 0,1 .......,.a 4...e -..... .. .r'`'m"r- e'en.' .raa.ra t a�}aanuu a3g N. vw 414Hv7 rolr i car%,r'elwrtl k. a / I I r~1 II , t� . In = rili Ill10 to C In .. u.II III■I nI■I in ui III / it IIIIll I 1 III IiI III i n • Iii 1 . �' III i n III 1 um um 41 .. el,. IU III III t= I1.1 II t Ill u� m III\ 1 111 t`1 fr.\ II `L j4 PI ! r ' • • JL1I t. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Renton Campus ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-053-87 APPLICATION NO. : SA-058-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: • Application for Site Plan Approval for two single story office buildings of 10, 000 sq. ft. and 17, 000 sq. ft. in Phase One and one single story 32, 120 sq. ft. office in Phase Two on a 5. 62 acre site. Project includes parking for 284 cars. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the East side of East Valley Highway North of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 Block of East Valle CONDITIONS: 1. That the applicant pay $197. 00 per trip (or an amount in accordance with the final adopted Valley mitigation program) in traffic mitigation fees as assessment for the Valley Transportation Benefit District based upon an ITE standard of 17.7 trips per 1, 000 gross square feet of office area. Note to Applicant: This amount or portion thereof may be credited towards the eventual purchase of a 45 foot reservation of property along the southern property if this is determined to be needed in the future for roadway construction. 2 . That noise impacts to the proposed office buildings from SR 167 be mitigated with the use of construction materials and/or berming and landscaping in order to reduce the interior noise levels to no higher than more that 50 dBA. 3 . That the applicant provide on site a minimum of 7, 500 sq. ft. of usable exterior recreation space for employees which could include a mixture of active and passive uses in one large space or a number of smaller spaces. Note to Applicant: That the applicant is advised to work with the Building and Zoning staff on the location of appropriate passive recreation areas for employees. Some of this space could appropriately be located at the south end of the site. 4 . In order to mitigate stormwater impacts, one oil/water separator should be provided on-site and if at some future time any of the site's stormwater runoff is discharged into the P-9 Channel a biofiltering swale shall be introduced to intercept the runoff before it enters the swale channel. / 4 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: f ),‘\(-1.1vi j DATE CIRCULATED: July 17. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: July 31, 19R7 EFC - _Q53 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-058-87 PROPONENT:_jnce Mueller Sri Ascnriatec PROJECT TITLE: Renton Campus BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Site Plan Approval for two single story office buildings 10,000 sq. ft.. and 17500 sq. ,ft. (phade one)and one single sLury. 32,120 sq. 11. uffiLe ('phase Lwu ) .Project includes parking for 284 cars. LOCATION: On East side of East Valley Highway North of S.W. 77th Street at the 2300-2700 Block of East Valley Road. SITE AREA: 5.6153 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 244.602 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY I � 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 1 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertis and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional ' f mation is nee a to properly assess this proposal. i 7-2-?— 7 'gnat , a of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENT. BUILDING & ZONING DEPSMENT { 7 DEVELOPMENT! APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 053 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-058-87 PROPONENT: LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE; RENTON CAMPUS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR TWO SINGLE STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS 10,000 SO. FT AND 17500 SO. FT. (PHASE ONE) AND ONE SINGLE STORY 32,120 SQ. FT. OFFICE (PHASE TWO) . PROJECT INCLUDES PARKING FOR 284 CARS. LOCATION : ON EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY NORTH OF S.W 27th. STREET AT THE 2300-2700 BLOCK OF EAST VALLEY ROAD. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ® ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ❑ UTILITIES ENG. IIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ,BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 11 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JULY 31,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : EAAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED 6rD S _Aei/ rL}ii r DATE: c�-29' 7 ATUR 9' iF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 7f,--Armuw- DATE CIRCULATED: July 17, 1983 COMMENTS DUE: July 31. 1987 EFC - _,50 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-058-87 PROPONENT:_143nre Minallpr and Acsnriatpc PROJECT TITLE: Renton Campus BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Site Plan Approval for two single story office buildings 10,000 sq. ft. and 17500 sq. ft. (phade one)and one single Sl,ur-y 32,120 sq. II. uffice (-phase Iwo ) .Project. includes parking for 284 cars, LOCATION: On East side of East Valley Highway North of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 Block of East Valley Road. SITE AREA: 5.6153 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 244,602 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY CITY OF RENTON 1) Earth -FT 2) Air AUG �' . 1\ 3) Water .� dare 4) Plants 1• /` 5) Animals � 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health >1/4/ 8) Land and-Shoreline Use �( 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ?� 14) Transportation i' ,lJ R. 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: -- - - r? 1� n \)1r; � `r\1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. LV ,0( Roo\ I i co 7 Signature of Dii for or Authorized Representative Date cj Form 4 REN N BUILDING & ZONING DEP . -'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 'REVIEW SHEET ECF - 053 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-058-87 PROPONENT: LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON CAMPUS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR' SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR TWO SINGLE STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS 10,000 SO. FT AND 17500 SO. FT. (PHASE ONE) AND ONE SINGLE STORY 32,120 SQ. FT. OFFICE (PHASE TWO) . PROJECT INCLUDES PARKING FOR 284 CARS. LOCATION : ON EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY NORTH'OF 'S'.W' 27th. STREET AT THE 2300.2700 BLOCK OF EAST VALLEY ROAD. TO: LI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : `)1121 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY OF IDBUILDING & ZON 'to ING DEPARTMENT _ I@jr Wi ` a POLICE DEPARTMENT AUG 11 / OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. FI OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON JULY 31,1987 II REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ZONIA369 . APPROVED ® APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED 4.E: 51* ef24. Lo Je_AJL,\ (,sv- DATE: /F8 'SIGNATURE OF DIRE OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 ' 2149N ENVIRONMENTALI CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P y-I:C DATE CIRCULATED: July 17. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: July 31. 1987 EFC - _Q53 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-058-87 PROPONENT:__Ljwp Mueller and Ascerin^tpc PROJECT TITLE: Renton Campus BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Site Plan Approval for two single story office buildings 10,000 sq. ft. and 17500 sq. ,ft. (phade one)and one Sinyle siury. 32,120 ski. IL. uffic,e (,phdse Lwu ) .Prujecl includes pdr•king for 284 cars. LOCATION: On East side of East Valley Nighway North of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 Block of East Valley Road. SITE AREA: 5.6153 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 244,602 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: gatik, C WA-P(4J tttee aal-C r ,,, / s P y s 9/ra.T G-ear aoal 44/41/4va ji✓; 474 Ctilc/-.•4,e2ge `/e 4.._ r'/e.Mit .ee-4 Ga. ifi a,i � / a /ie (- Cr / 7I `?adVe.K 71,,e 4,-c o 1`WZ9 G!`C�l�Z7'GlGct, o!ti e c ,Ti e rn ii /_ `faeat 74 f(re /7gedi- 4 f, (" feiz )4 r /he fkoid e' deJ7 ecelSG tiVe 1474 a J. % ( J. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition information is needed to properly assess this proposal. f Si. -r` •re o Di ecto or Authorized Representative Date 18 e/f- Grp /6? Form 4 "'1� f r RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPI. MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET - 053 - 87 ECF APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-058-87 PROPONENT: LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON CAMPUS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR TWO SINGLE STORY 1 OFFICE BUILDINGS 10,000 SO. FT AND 17500 SO. FT. (PHASE ONE) AND ONE SINGLE STORY 32,120 SQ. FT. OFFICE (PHASE TWO) . PROJECT INCLUDES PARKING FOR 284 CARS. LOCATION : ON EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY NORTH OF S.W 27th STREET AT THE 2300-2700 BLOCK OF EAST VALLEY ROAD. I TO: JPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 17:1 ENGINEERING DIVISION , E] TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU , PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT 0 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JULY 31,1987 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Jeo+/Z OAPPROVED EgjAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS , ONOT APPROVED 4 ..1-<,7c-4a/e A__ p-a.,/}K dpie, ..e. fywc ,,,, .., V4e ,--,-,,f, Z eie 4,e - Me S'l%ee /% ere-it'--- ll e/i-Cac,V C // J4- l 4��/'`�" c.A. e ,4 ji L/c_ li-froG#A7,-G ,,A.._ dy r' / V/ep ge'kA-Gvv C 3 . h /,, cle �eV 1 a"-cws k- Ge4 f c/C ,e* 6(--// ,j- mod - w(-ll a/�.� d' rf//UC /-�C ,- ,o/1"�� cooa�7� �•l' , a. af , Gl1)`y-<'e� race. c06,0„s4,4 6v de- o,--v�-4� ,,,, DATE: (�� 24 / ??? SIGNAlp-E OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Q�21 Jr.,r.r. REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ) Icc r1 DATE CIRCULATED: July 17, 987 COMMENTS DUE: July 31. 1987 EFC - _153 - 87 d' ,r 1 rtENTON APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-058-87 J U L 1 a 1987 PROPONENT:__Lancp Mueller and Assoriatps POLICY PROJECT TITLE: Renton Campus ncr"'gyp"qc.T "N— BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Site Plan Approval for two single story office buildings 10,000 sq. ft.. and 17500 sq. •ft. (phade one)and one single 51oty 32,120 sq. IL. uffice (.Ntiuse l.wo ) .Project includes Narking for 284 cars. LOCATION: On East side of East Valley Highway North• of S. L. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 Block of East Valley Road. SITE AREA: 5.6153 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 244,602 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth V I 2) Air ✓ 3) Water ✓ 4) Plants V 5) Animals • ✓ 6) Energy and Natural Resources Le ' 7) Environmental Health ✓ 8) Land and Shoreline Use ✓ 3 ' 9) Housing V 10) Aesthetics ✓ 11) Light and Glare ✓ 12) Recreation ✓ 2 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation . ✓ NTON 14) Transportation s C®E�ttAlt D E 15) Public Services ✓ jtiL 28 1987 ' 16) Utilities ✓ COMMENTS: BUILDING 1 ZONING DE T. ) i. -( 4'o .. A 401v2 -99" �t ( Vor—,4-- L 7 `?tLL ) P- 1 ) P-- � •A-Axt-e-4-A-Dine • fl) t r•$ = ex, AA.At.ALA 4a- * — .471. A•A•• 7t-AAA . •tA' r;t•e'&dt4— Adtsi‘.4t-tdtAt"t-6 4=4=1 jaAulfAA :1°." •'#'€-^tz,„.. r74.1"4LtI2t- -;1>:1:7-jj7; L4114. J We have reviewed this plication with articular a entio to tF a areas we ®v'0_ ' have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 6aizzbadevtio_Signature of Director or uthoriz d epresentative ► : e 9 Form 4 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEP ;MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 053 - 87 ENTON APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-058-87 JUL 1 l 1987 POLICY PROPONENT: LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATES /1MMOPPIP6'7" ^e^- PROJECT TITLE : RENTON CAMPUS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR TWO SINGLE STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS 10,000 SO. FT AND 17500 SQ. FT. (PHASE ONE) AND ONE SINGLE STORY 32,120 SQ. FT: OFFICE (PHASE TWO) . PROJECT INCLUDES PARKING FOR 284 CARS. LOCATION : ON EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY NORTH OF :S.W' 27th. STREET AT THE 2300--2700 BLOCK OF EAST VALLEY ROAD. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION flTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU DPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT E...POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : A COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON JULY 31,1987 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; APPROVED APPROVED WITH DITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED I RECEIV ED JUL 28 1987 • BUILDING I ZONING DEPT. T SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR 0 AUTHOLZ REPRESENTATIVEDATE; Ajr4tt /4S) � REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 ►f 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWIN G DEPARTMENT: ElInP- _)rt DATE CIRCULATED: July 17. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: July 31, 1987 EFC - _Q53 - 87 - APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-058-87 PROPONENT: Lapce Mueller and AasnriRtes PROJECT TITLE: Renton Campus BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Site Plan Approval for two singip story office buildings 10,000 sq. ft. and 17500 sq. ,ft. (phade one)and one single Siury 32,120 5t1. IL. uffice (phdse Iwo ) .PrujecL inCludes parking for 284 cars. LOCATION: On East side of East Valley Highway North of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 Block of East Valley Road. SITE AREA: 5.6153 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 244,602 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth �✓ 2) Air 1/ 3) Water ✓ 4) Plants I/ 5) Animals c/ 6) Energy and Natural Resources v" 7) Environmental Health r✓ 8) Land and Shoreline Use ✓ 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 1✓ STY OF NEN-131 N 12) Recreation ✓ e� D 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation Uu 3 198 r 15) Public Services ' BULDRkle B 7ONIN DEPT, 16) Utilities COMMENTS: I) le 10 Ai- s/-4c i w-�rd ,.c am S . •�c,✓aliGs' 3/ J�Y�^^ �. i Fi'� <'k- 9 2� z&5G✓t 4 `�, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of e or or Aut "ori ed Representative Date Form 4 • RENTS BUILDING & ZONING DEPA 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 053 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-058-87 PROPONENT : LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON CAMPUS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR TWO SINGLE STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS 10,000 SQ. FT AND 17500 SQ. FT. (PHASE ONE) AND ONE SINGLE STORY 32,120 SQ. FT. OFFICE (PHASE TWO) . PROJECT INCLUDES PARKING FOR 284 CARS. LOCATION : ON EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY NORTH OF S.W 27th. STREET AT THE 2300-2700 BLOCK OF EAST VALLEY ROAD. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : DENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY ;,F AENTOM BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RE i� I` �9 ED POLICE DEPARTMENT AUG 3 1987 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING !ZONING DEPT. OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JULY 31,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : LI APPROVED EAPPROIVED WIT CONDITIONS EI NOT APPROVED 1) Pro yr-ic 0— s,re d" Z> S Ade .Sam w -- /,�5"O c,s .�( -3 6 Q. lam b 1/ ( i#-4 -- F �17✓r �/ ,p / d z Qist.-ST k./v +, ,S S po ►..r r[ via- �r7✓e i 3 / F—� H-ed.C__ P— 9 Goa • DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 pf 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: rcy «e DATE CIRCULATED: July 17. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: July 31, 1987 EFC - - 87 . APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-058-87 PROPONENT: .Lance MiiPl1er and AccnriatPc PROJECT TITLE: Renton Campus BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application: for Site Plan Approval for two single story office buildings 10,000 sq. ft.. and 17500 sq. •ft. (phase one)and one shrgle story 32,120 sq. IL. uffice (-phase two ) .Prujecl includes parking for 284 cars. LOCATION: On East side of East Valley Highway North of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 Block of East Valley Road. SITE AREA: 5.6153 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 244.602 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 4 2) Air 3) Water ' 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 4 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use ' 9) Housing ' 10) Aesthetics 1 11) Light and Glare fi 12) Recreation ' 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RE CEO V En AUG 5 1987 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date , Form 4 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPA ,-WENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 053 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-058-87 'PROPONENT: LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON CAMPUS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR TWO SINGLE STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS 10,000 SO. FT AND 17500 SQ. FT. (PHASE ONE) AND ONE SINGLE STORY 32,120 SQ. FT. OFFICE (PHASE TWO) . PROJECT INCLUDES PARKING FOR ;p84 CARS. LOCATION: ON EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY NORTH OF :S.W' 27th. STREET AT THE 2300-2700 BLOCK OF EAST VALLEY ROAD. TO: 4:1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT y SCHEDULED ERC DATE : EIENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ❑ UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 1 ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 4 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT D BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 1SPOLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT $ I: OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JULY 31,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: OAPPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT BUBLDING & ZONONG DER MENT P • DEVELOP' °E '' T kLIPPL CATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 053 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-058-87 PROPONENT : LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON CAMPUS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR TWO SINGLE STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS 10 000 SO. FT AND 17500 SQ. FT. (PHAL'E ONE) AND ONE SINGLE STORY 32,120 SQ. FT. OFFICE (PHASE TWO) . PROJECT INCLUDES PARKING FOR 284 CARS. LOCATION : ON EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY NORTH OF 'S.W' 27th. STREET AT THE 2300-2700 BLOCK OF EAST VALLEY ROAD. TO: El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ® ENGINEERING DIVISION aTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT CBI`Y OF RENTON 9 TDE C U ll V L. L BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ® POLICE DEPARTMENT AU G 3 1987 ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT �� I' �' I � � (' P T. El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON JULY 31,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : i F�AF//� E476)A-1 'IJ/V ® APPROVED ® APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS A NOT APPROVED a 2 ., AL si e. 5 a' $'-r w .a l i 1,^ Kr l c / �_�- 7 _// / • • •_I. Ci / 2-1! 41 -1a.j �� Le- .n l r /4.'1-< c: r7 ep,�— r ti ��Lr c._.�9 i K 7/ j cord-Ai, -�il �� =+ j5.� c.ra/ f.r_l� / (�C�" /+' L`A• �� .•r • I r L ,gyp "4 ( �R Cw� J/t- �� ATE 7 E J : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE `t g / ! L 6 p r� /1�_ • 0-7)-. !� i� �1/LD i-e REV!SION 5/1982 - cs� Form 182 `,L 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST R VIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -Yn-(6? , DATE CIRCULATED: July 17, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: July 31, 1987 EFC - _;5O - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-058-87 PROPONENT:_-[,.anr.e Mueller and Associates PROJECT TITLE: Renton Campus • • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Site Plan Approval for two single story office buildings 10,000 sq. ft. and. 17500 sq. .ft. (phade one)and one single slury 32,120 sif. 11. uffice ('phdse Lwu ) .Project includes pdr°king for 284 cars. LOCATION: On East side of East Valley Highway North- of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 Block of East Valley Road. SITE AREA: 5.6153 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 244,602 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY _y . 1) Earth - 2) Air ,, 3) Water 4) Plants - `� 5) Animals `�'� 6) Energy and Natural Resources r�--- 7) Environmental Health liMPAI 8) Land and Shoreline Use ,- -NTON 9) Housing 4. '= .._ �, a V E 10) Aesthetics . '--'' IIIIIIIIh =" 11) Light and Glare /� 1987 12) Recreation --- V.° P 2,C, 'INC, DEPT. 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation �a-°--- 15) Public Services "'"� 16) Utilities '-_" COMMENTS: _ 4 ,1 A I1' v tV •1r.5��t. , . , 7 . f, _t � (t -,I . 9 I / ram. ,.-..� ..-} e!' ae,� 4 el) /,_• s._= ,, / B 7'/ V a,L/c,_a '✓Z ' i/a rj..�:; . e/ � 7 at�k•ti.� z- D� ' a �� l - ilil JiT I ,C? = �v-I S e Y sl t 4)- c - , `� - c-n, 0.-, v �, , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. G%?.... _ ‘.4.01- 2 / ap/g 7 Signature of Director or AuthoridRepresentative Date 4p g\'1 L''I.} I 1'� �' ``, i• ,,_� '0-,r.fl/; f1'. ,,,-[,,; , Form 4 i`.IC 0 ,� ` -� -, ,1 .�-n ' l 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: July 17. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: July 31, 1987 EFC - 053 - 87_ APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-058-87 PROPONENT• -_L.,anCP Mueller end AccnrintPs PROJECT TITLE: Renton Campus BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Site Plan Approval for two single story office buildings 10,000 sq. ft.. ,and. 17500 sq. ,ft. (phade one)and one single story 32,120 sq. R. office (phase Iwo ) .Pr•ujecL includes parking for 284 cars. LOCATION: On East side of East Valley Highway North of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 Block of East Valley Road. SITE AREA: 5.6153 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 244.602 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants ' 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services ✓ 16) Utilities COMMENTS: CITY CV RENT ON RECEOVED jut 31. 19S7 BUILDING 1 ZONING CZPT. -trir We have - ''ewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have ex.- se -nd have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi• - nf. 7 •n is needed to properly assess this proposal. • - 7/ // Sign-" ore of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 --R. RENT--- BUILDING & ZONIOG DEPA 'AGENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 053 - 87 fi APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-058-87 PROPONENT : LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON CAMPUS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR TWO SINGLE STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS 10,000 SQ. FT AND 17500 SQ. FT. (PHASE ONE) AND ONE SINGLE STORY 32,120 SQ. FT: OFFICE (PHASE TWO) . PROJECT INCLUDES PARKING FOR 284 CARS. LOCATION : ON EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY NORTH OF IS.W 27th STREET AT THE 2300-2700 BLOCK OF EAST VALLEY ROAD. 4 TO : 1::] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ® ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Chrf F RENTIM ER E C IF: 11 '),,:' 11;3; fr---% E POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ,)UL e I 1987 DOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JULY 31,1987 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ('T/L/Ty ,��n/E,AJE.E',e/Hilo APPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ri NOT APPROVED (-77L/TY ,ENG. /VEEP S TD MEET OTiUTVAi'PROYAL SOHIECT T®� /�1/7f/ C/V/I EN6-. Foie / /6C7 1Y1PP..V,� TD ,eEso .v.E 1/✓.47-6-se ,a ES/GT/ IM MO AGREEMENT-VEER rn I NO 1. ___ C7UE7/ON. 14M-'7 I PL 4R/ ,PEA101/EL LATE was AGREEMENT-SEMI AID,.!•,=m� C3y 2L D Pose P er/ e , E-vizi-v. SYST��TCHARGiE-V".,1F;:i �y 5_ o. .PT. 2��6,02 -• 9, 7g4. os' SYSt®/EYELLI!'MENT CHARGE-SEv.I s l SQ.I FT 21 6 P2 = 9 704. ! SPECIAL UMW AREA CI:T"":-i _ tit^�@ i/D1 Or // ✓cY fV tir 04 SPECIAL AI TENT AREA Cf:A, -i - i APPROVED WATER PLAN / 5 . APPROVED SEWER PLAN ye-,i AIE cri 2L v, APPROVED FIRE MYDRANT LOL°ATW S yeS �T DY FIRE DEPT. . in-, G / FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS I� V U (jv' ./ DATE: 7/ 31 4 . . SIGNATURE OF DIRE TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: July 17, 1987 -iCOMMENTS DUE: July 31, 1987 EFC - 5�3 - 87 O`'L APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-058-87 3. 7 10• � PROPONENT:_( ance iftplIpr and Acccriatpq AIIC PROJECT TITLE: Renton Campus BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Site Plan Approval for two single story office buildings 10,000 sq. ft. and. 17500 sq. ,ft. (phade one)and one 5inyle slury 32,120 sq. IL. office (phase Lwu ) .PrujecL includes park htg for 284 cars. LOCATION: On East side of East Valley Highway North of S.W. 27th Street at the - 2300-2700 Block of East Valley Road. SITE AREA: 5.6153 acres BUILDING AREA'(gross): 244.602 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use ' 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: CITY CF RENTO N RECEIVED JUL 2 01987 BUILDING !ZONING DEPT. Jk We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. • ill/ lv1 /9.7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da Form ,. .� RENT' BUILDING & ZONING DEN MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET fCF - 053 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : sA-058-87 PROPONENT: LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATES 'PROJECT TITLE ; RENTON CAMPUS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR TWO SINGLE STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS 10,000 SO. FT AND 17500 SO. FT. (PHASE ONE) AND ONE SINGLE STORY 32,120 SQ. FT: OFFICE (PHASE TWO) . PROJECT INCLUDES PARKING FOR 284 CARS. LOCATION : ON EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY NORTH OF :S•.W' 27th. STREET AT THE 2300-2700 BLOCK OF EAST VALLEY ROAD. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : • El ENGINEERING DIVISION • 0 TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION Eg_ FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU F PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT RE C®I RENTON E D BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT JUL 2 01987 POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : ;COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JULY 31,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : El APPROVED s APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED / CGa. �,ce �-24 erai- Gae+��/ �C ati� a ll- cam. o "aze) e „ /64, zalta, .3• CZ.Lef:/_,./„04/61-1 ?- el p y c a/ goo ' / /z��:/� s� -e DATE: / 0/0), / 7.? SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 crv, /' REQUIRCU FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME --ic.,TBW C . )✓»A,'7S U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS //?s7 /I--4-,�yi S-Gcl - ,,,... 7 '- FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV I I FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE V Y WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: / , GROUND FLOOR AREA: Sig,taei FT2 (A) [' NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE #1, USING AREA (A): ,,Z50 GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: - l/Z, 5 GPM IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARDi, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) CC) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) A, 1/3 70 5 GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: - /Z /go 7 GPM CE) (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF CD): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT; USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH /,,g' ADD 6- % 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST G a/ ADD / % 31 - 60 SOUTH • 4 S ADD /D % 61 101 -100 0 10% MAX. WEST (,5' ADD /0 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : AM % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJUSTMENT: 776 GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT; GPM CO 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: 4/93.- "25 GPM (H) / ,� a aSd 4' 'r�?• 11. SIGNED: /c--s � /��'� - CITY OF •ENTON RECEIVED JUL 2 01987 BUILDING !ZONING DEPT. REQUIRED FIR( FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME c_°r-Ar7©A' (3)f.?..,/),/s U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS 4E 7°- ,/Ga/%w'v .. 5-. 6:), ? FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV II ;:) FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE 0 V Y WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: /� / GROUND FLOOR AREA: / Ddd FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: / • TOTAL BUILDING AREA: /l,DDD 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): /7SQ 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM (C) �/37; SD GPM CC) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD,, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): CIF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) /3/,2.5- GPM CD) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: —8-- GPM CE) CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 11 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH SD ADD /5 % 30 20% MAX.31 - 60 15% MAX. EAST / Z' ADD ,2S % 61 -I6010% MAX. SOUTH y6 ADD i� % 101 -150 5$ MAX. WEST (;4 � ADD //J % 101 OR-1 4-HR WALLOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 0% MAX.� (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : ,. % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJUSTMENT: 7 2 7- 6— GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: --1!9----- GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,030 GPM) (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: 2/M GPM (H) aaso . �./r). i 11. SIGNED: CATE J ce ,..7d, /987 RE C E I V ED . JUL 201987 BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. `sD L.-m_ o r iii] 9 3 7 SUMMARY OF RENTON CAMPUS BUILDING SETBACK COMPEYAI-CEri / ( ', `j';;?': 1917.. Setbacks from East Valley Road In the M-P zone, Renton Code Section 4-730 (c) 4.a. requires minimum setbacks of 60 feet from arterial streets such as East Valley Road, except where the lots are shallow (i.e. , 300 feet or less in depth as measured perpendicular to the street) , in which case the minimum setback must be at least 20% of the lot depth. The minimum setback required by this rule is illustrated on the site plan. Since all three of the proposed buildings are at least 60 feet from the east margin of East Valley Road, the proposal satisfies the zoning code's setback requirements for building setbacks from East Valley Road. Setbacks from SR 167 The M-P zone's "Other Yards" setback provisions, Section 4- 730 (c) 4.b. , require that " [a]ll buildings or structures be located a minimum of twenty feet (20' ) from all other property lines, including limited access ,highways. " However, the M-P zone's "Flexible Setbacks" provisions, which are contained in Section 4-730 (c) 4. f. , provide for the reduction or elimination of a rear setback when such setback is not adjacent to a public street if the front setback is increased accordingly. Presumably, this flexibility is limited by the Freeway/Arterial Street Setback Restrictions of Section 4-716, which require a minimum 10 feet landscaped setback from a limited access highway property line. The rear setback reduction provision of Section 4- 730 (c) 4. f. is applicable to the Renton Campus project rear setback because the project's rear yard abuts a limited access highway, SR 167, and because, for purposes of Section 4- 730 (c) 4. f. , a limited access highway is not a "public street. " That limited access highways are not to be considered streets for purposes of the Flexible Setbacks provision is clear from the fact that the M-P zone's "Other Yards" provisions encompass setbacks from limited access highways, as the following excerpt from Section 4-730 (c) 4.b. illustrates: b. Other Yards: All buildings or structures shall be located a minimum of twenty feet (20' ) from all other [i.e. , non-street] property lines, including limited access highways. (Underlining added. ) Thus, because the rear setback reduction provision of Section 4-730 (c) 4. f. applies, and because of Section 4-716's minimum 10 foot setback requirement applicable to limited access Page 1 of 2 .I , highways in all zones, the minimum setback from the SR 167 right- of-way is 10 feet, provided that the front setback has effectively been increased accordingly. Since, by simple examination of the site plan, the west edges of both Buildings 1 and 2 lie more than 10 feet east of the building setback from East Valley Road that is otherwise required by Section 4- 730 (c) 4.a. , the front setback for these two buildings has in fact been "increased accordingly" as to those two buildings. As designed, Buildings 1 and 2 in their entirety lie at least 10 feet from the SR 167 right-of-way and thus meet the zoning code setback requirements for those two buildings. Building 3 lies well in excess of the ordinary 20-foot setback requirement from SR 167 and thus satisfies the setback requirement without resort to the Flexible Setbacks provisions. (As an additional comment to the application of the Flexible Setbacks provisions to Buildings 1 and 2, Section 4- 730(c) 4. f. specifies that " [t]he site plan decision shall be based on a finding that, with reduced setbacks the architectural design, building orientation, circulation, noise and glare of the proposed project will be compatible with adjacent uses. " This clearly will be the case because the adjacent use here is a limited access highway. Further, the rear setback reduction makes possible the attractive, stepped-rear-wall design of Buildings 1 and 2 . Note that because of the stepped design, the average distance between the SR 167 right-of-way and the east faces of Buildings 1 and 2 is at least 20 feet. ) Setbacks From the North and South Property Lines The "Other Yards" setback provisions of Section 4- 730(c) 4.b. require minimum building setbacks of 20 feet from both the north and south boundaries of the Renton Place site. The proposed project complies with this requirement because Building 1 is setback much further south than 20 feet from the site's north boundary and because Building 3 is setback much further north than 20 feet from the site's south boundary. Lance Mueller & Associates Architects AIA June 24, 1987 Corrected August 5, 1987 Page 2 of 2 DAVID Ti. HALINEN (206) 454-8272 ATTORNEY AT LAW Plaza Center Building Suite b000 io9o0 Northeast Eighth Street Bellevue,Washington 98004 C y CfF :.NT'O N August 5, 1987 15 Lc= f r_� 11 ) I \ City of Renton r'!!i 0987 I A J Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 'a ` i 7,0 DEP. Attn: Ms. Betty Grimshaw RE: Correction to Summary of Renton Campus Building Setback Compliance Dear Ms. Grimshaw: I would like to call to your attention an inadvertent error in the above-referenced Summary by Lance Mueller and Associates, dated June 24, 1987. (That Summary was included as part of the site plan approval process application. ) Specifically, the word "not" was omitted before the word "adjacent" in the second sentence of the third paragraph on page 1. In the enclosed, corrected version, which is dated August 5, 1987, that sentence has been corrected to read as follows: However, the M-P zone's "Flexible Setbacks" provisions, which are contained in Section 4-730 (c) 4. f. , provide for the reduction or elimination of a rear setback when such setback is not adjacent to a public street if the front setback is increased accordingly. The arguments based on the subject sentence are unaffected since they are predicated on the sentence being as it has now been corrected. Sincerely, David L. Halinen DLH:dmm Enclosure cc: Dion Young Lance Mueller & Associates Architects AIA 4-730 4-730 C,4) d. Adjacent to Residential Lots: Whenever a proposed use in the M-P Zone shares a common property line with a lot designated residential on both the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map, the minimum setback contiguous to the common property line shall be fifty feet (50'). Whenever an adjacent lot contains a residential use and either the Comprehensive Plan or zoning designation or both is something other than residential, then the appropriate setback and landscaping adjacent to the residential lot shall be determined by site plan approval. A site plan decision to require more than the minimum setback and landscaping shall consider the long term viability of the residential use, the presence of other residential uses in the surrounding area, and such other indications of stability as owner-occupancy and housing condition. e. Use of Setback Areas: All required setback areas shall be unoccupied and unobstructed except for off-street parking and loading, driveways, entrance roads, a gatehouse or guardhouse, water pits, lawn sprinklers, walkways, landscaping, ordinary and necessary utility service facilities, utility poles, lighting fixtures, identifying and direction signs, underground installations accessory to any permitted use, and railroads. f. Flexible Setbacks: With site plan approval and subject to applicable Building and Fire Codes, one of the side setbacks (not adjacent to a public street or residential use, as defined in Section 4-730(C)4,d above) may be reduced or eliminated if the total of both side setbacks is at least forty feet (40'); and the rear setback not adjacent to a public street may be reduced or eliminated if the front setback is increased accordingly. The site plan decision shall be based on a finding that, with reduced setbacks, the architectural design, building orientation, circulation, noise and glare of the proposed project will be compatible with adjacent uses. 5. Height: a. In the M-P Zone, no height limit is established, provided that all required setback areas on the periphery of the lot shall be increased one additional foot in building height above forty five feet (45'). b. Gate houses or guardhouses shall not exceed twelve feet (12') in height. 6. Landscaping: (Ord. 3463, 8-11-80) a. Setback Areas: A landscaped strip a minimum of twenty feet (20') in width or one-half ('h) the required setback, whichever is less, shall be provided adjacent to all street or highway right-of-way lines, except limited access highways; and a landscaped strip a minimum of ten feet (10°) in width or one- half ('h) the required setback, whichever is less, shall be provided adjacent to interior side lot lines within the required front setback. (Ord. 4035, 12-22-86) b. Adjacent to Residential Lots: Whenever a proposed use in the M-P Zone shares a common property line with a lot that is designated residential 287 40 CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 17, 1987 Bob Fadden and Dion Young Lance Mueller & Associates 130 Lakeside St. 250 Seattle, WA 98122 • RE: Renton Campus Site Approval and Environmental Review (Files ECF-053-87, SA-058-87) Dear Messrs. Fadden and Young: The Building —and Zoning Department has formally accepted your environmental checklist application for the above referenced project. Your application has been routed and tentatively scheduled for the Environmental Review Committee -on August 12, 1987, to - consider your environmental checklist. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of your project, please contact Betty Grimshaw of this office at 235- 2540. Sin r Do . Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE: 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 CITY OF RENTON „; . BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 17, 1987 Gary Merlino _ ANMARCO 9125 10th Ave. So. Seattle, WA 98108 RE: Renton Campus Site Approval and Environmental Review (Files ECF-053-87, SA-058-87) Dear Mr. Merlino: The Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted your environmental checklist application for the above referenced project. Your application has been routed and tentativelyscheduled for_ = --the Environmental Review Committee on August 12, 1987, to consider your environmental checklist. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of your project, please contact Betty Grimshaw of this office at 235- 2540. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP. Zoning Administrator DKE: • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 lance mueller R associates � � id architects July 15, 1987 JUL z 5 IC' 7 ��Q �' v�198 � o CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Ave. So. Renton, Washington 98055 Re: RENTON CAMPUS SITE APPROVAL & EXAMINATION REVIEW (FILES ECF-053-87, SA-058-87) Dear Sirs: This letter is to address the concerns that have been raised by the preliminary staff review regarding the above referenced project. 1. The noise impacts from the building's proximity to SR 167 will be reduced by the following existing and proposed methods. A difference of over 5 ft. between the elevation at the crown of SR 167 and the floor elevation of the proposed office buildings should provide a measurable reduction in the highway noise. Added along the east property line will be landscaping which will include evergreen trees that will provide a natural year round sound barrier. The exterior concrete walls of the building will be 6 to 8 inches thick, covered with 3-1/2 inches of batt insulation and 5/8 inch GWB should provide for a substantial reduction in noise from SR 167. The glass at the east elevation will be 1 inch insulated glass which normally provides adequate noise barrier qualities. 2. The landscape plan has been revised to show all trees aligned in a uniform layout on Merlino's property to allow for a more uniform streetscape over time. 3. The drainage concerns has been addressed in the letter attached. 130 lakeside• suite 250 • seattle,washington 98122[206)325-2553 lance mueller ela,cal•senior associates:robert olacheweky,eileen furney associates:robert fadden,michael galbraith,richard harnleh,robert wells a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by and under the supervision of registered architects lance mueller & associates architects July 15, 1987 CITY OF RENTON RENTON CAMPUS SITE APPROVAL & EXAMINATION Page Two If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact myself or Bob Fadden at this office at 325-2553. Sincerely, LANCE UELLER & A SOCIATES/ARCHITECTS Dion Young DY:nk encl. 11 CETV op ,„,,,3, t BUILDilJUL 15 1987 r�J l) 130 lakeside • suite 250 • Seattle,washington 98122[206]325-2553 lance mueller ale,cei•senior associates:robert olachewaky,eileen furney associates:robert fadden,michael geibraith,richard harnish,robert wells a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by and under the supervision of registered architects BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INc. RECEIVED 2009 Minor Avenue East Seattle, Washington 98102 JUL 13 1887 Area 206 / 323-4144 LANCE MUEP ER & ASSOC. July 13, 1987 Mr. Dion Young Lance Mueller & Associates 130 Lakeside, Suite 250 Seattle, WA 98122 Re: Renton Campus Site Approval and Environmental Review BRH Job No. 87066 Dear Dion: Per our telephone discussion of July 9, 1987, we are providing clarification on Item 4 of Donald Erickson's letter of July 2 , 1987 , to Bob Fadden and yourself concerning the Renton Campus site approval and environmental review. Item 4 requests more information on the proposed runoff detention system, its location and the treatment system for the runoff. The system shown on the design schematic dated April 3, 1987, proposes 90 L.F. of 72" storm sewer pipe for primary detention of runoff from the entire site. This pipe and the associated control manhole are located at the northwest corner of the property. The outlet pipe from the control manhole is shown connecting to an existing 48" diameter culvert which crosses under East Valley Road adjacent to this location. Our understanding obtained from discussions with City of Renton and U.S. Soil Conservation Service officials is the P-9 Channel had been planned at the same location as the 48" diameter culvert mentioned above, but the project is not presently active. The outlet pipe would then discharge at the future location of the P-9 Channel. Currently, no bio-filtration system is indicated ,before connection to the 48" pipe but an oil/water separator willpprobabl?Sbe installed in the system before its discharge to the channel. Also;• •whe the P-9 is constructed a bio-filtering swale may be located on the main channel bottom similar to the configuration used on the P-1 Channel. Another option which was considered but has not been shown on the schematic is a tie to an existing 21" diameter storm sewer stub up to the property line from the East Valley Road road drainage system. This pipe is located approximately mid-way along the west property line and may be a viable alternative discharge point for the site. If you have any questions please contact me. Sincerely, PC ITV ��;;,,�;.r ;r,7C,V; r 4YNryry�s6J9Tu :: LAI JUL 15 1987 Robert H. Darrow, P.E. RHD/cd BUI . f,° cc: Bob Fadden, LMA Bob Roed, BRH Paul Dragoo, BRH CIVIL ENGINEERS/ LAND SURVEYORS y . !9 v O _ ; N 2 8v N "Pi? I� N _ F.�.: V :1 N > j00 r) Eli li 16 11) il Ill 1 4 ci % i r 3 4 AM C Di Z id billi II illi 14 I lb 1 \O-iil' - 5ii 1! P 11# 1! ".4 1 !I ; ii it 1E 41 „:•Dr \ K'r1 Y' U p is P Yr Ili 'U' nH .:0 iii p. ig q il 1; p Vg 1 i I 1 t ti 4 %1 1 I !il , = i. ,s 5? , i, 0 u.1 1 ;ifs 1p ai zg 1 I 11 ie, 0 i er 1.ert cf! JE g 0 [ ; i 1 1 (.'i I It Aft 40 eke o c d m € a sraAe 0 1, _I_ ( ril' OF RENTON pi — D `mli �' 8ils E. R 0 1E0711ED J U L 15 1987 _" BU1LD 9G I ZON G DEPT. LA /D Lammaanaltia : c. 't ;. a' '` T o�. S 6 rArwmma![aa! A o L D 1 II� 10 4D a N. �a C 4� C ry: i l °: 43 _w© l0' 1 b. r' 40 q. i1 51,, if 1 14 • p d i e 9 v 1 (f�9: !Ss ' 12, O. is S? `tl 0g�HsW®1r ®> HIT A% LANDSCAPE PLAN RENTON CAMPUS 9 p• igar,.muelbr Renton,Wa P.. arc Meats ala r t es a p •m w..rr ....a.:...n.ass r>a ave aen> > LANCE MUELLER [LIET1rL .O F UQQ2SIffl uirr m ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS 130 Lakeside Suite 250 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 DATE /f//71oa NO. ATTENTION /L (206) 325-2553 / TO ` `/ 7 RE:,// "i `V r..�� WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: — 0r4pp drawings rints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications py of letter ❑ Change order 0 COPIES /ATE NO. DESCRIPTION 7 1 1;------/-eer, ,r---,edr-- .,,,,,,A.//,-2,.. ),,,,,(„-,,,,,,,,,...;z- 7 ( ifit--"%re,*--"K-0,a77 ii7 CFA Of REMu=6 RLGE 11 V E --0-- i JIJl 7 5 1997 BU LDUG /ZQI iiyICI bEP i, THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED: PRODUCT 240.2 / Ees/loc.Won.Mac 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. f 40 ti,, 0 CITY OF RENTON "LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 2, 1987 RECEIVED cfpr OF ?RENTON G� E GED J U L 61987 ,1UL 1 5 1987 LANCE MUE!'ER & ASSOC. Bob Fadden & Dion Young BUILDING ZONING DEPT. Lance Mueller & Associates 130 Lakeside St. 250 Seattle, WA 98122 RE: Renton Campus Site Approval and Environmental Review (Files ECF-053-87, SA-058-87) • Dear Sirs: The Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted your environmental checklist and application for the above referenced project. The preliminary staff review has identified the following issues which you may wish to begin looking at: 1. The possible need. for an on or off-ramp to SR 167 across the property has been identified by the Traffic Engineering Department. The site plan needs to anticipate this future need. Possibilities might include some two-story buildings and parking under the building. 2 . We will need more specific information on the type of exterior materials that are to be used and what measures are planned to reduce the noise impacts from the building's proximity to SR • 167. 3 . The landscape features shown on the site plan are not consistent with the landscape plan. Trees in the public right-of-way should be uniformly spaced so that other parcels . can be planted in a' similar manner to create a more uniform streetscape overtime. More evergreens could also be used to minimize winter bareness in other areas of the site. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 4. The drainage system to be used for the site needs to be explained in more detail. The application states that "site runoff will be collected in a city approved detention system and be discharged into the public system in the street. " We need more information about any proposed detention system, its location and the treatment system to be used. We need to know where site runoff will eventually be disposed and, if it goes into the P9 channel, whether it will be bio-filtered. We will not be able to schedule this project for ERC review pending receipt of this additional information, although we will begin routing your application to other departments for their comments. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact myself or Jean t e Sam -McKague of this office at 235-2540. ince 1 Do K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DE:BG 9 t4 ayru it CITY OF 7�J ENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 2, 1987 Bob Fadden & Dion Young Lance Mueller & Associates 130 Lakeside St. 250 Seattle, WA 98122 • RE: Renton Campus Site Approval and Environmental Review (Files ECF-053-87, SA-058-87) Bear Sirs: , The Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted your environmental checklist and application for the above referenced project. The preliminary staff review has identified the following issues which you may wish to begin looking at: 1. The possible need for an on or off-ramp to SR 167 across the property has been identified by the Traffic Engineering Department. The site plan needs to anticipate this future need. Possibilities might include some two-'story buildings and parking under the building. 2 . We will need more specific information on the type of exterior materials that are to be used and what measures are planned to reduce the noise impacts from the building's proximity to SR 167. 3 . The landscape features shown on the site plan are not consistent with the landscape plan. Trees in the public right-of-way should be uniformly spaced so that other parcels can be planted in a similar manner to create a more uniform streetscape overtime. More evergreens could also be used to minimize winter bareness in other areas of the site. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 rl z I i 4. The drainage system to be used for the site needs to be explained in more detail. The application states that "site runoff will be collected in a city approved detention system and be discharged into the public system in the street. " We need more information about any proposed detention system, its location and the treatment system to be used. We need to know where site runoff will eventually be disposed and, if it goes into the P9 channel, whether it will be bio-filtered. We will not be able to schedule this project for ERC review pending receipt of this additional information, although we will begin routing your application to other departments for their comments. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact myself or Jean t e Sam -McKague of this office at 235-2540. Ince 1 I f Don K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DE:BG I 4110 Cm sZ CITY OF RENTON soLL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 2, 1987 Gary Merlino ANMARCO 9125 10th Ave. So. Seattle, WA 98108 RE: Renton Campus Site Approval and Environmental Review (Files ECF-053-87, SA-058-87) Dear Sirs: The Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted your environmental checklist and application for the above referenced project. The preliminary staff review has identified the following issues which you may wish to begin looking at: 1. The possible need, for an on or off-ramp to SR 167 across the property has been identified by the Traffic Engineering Department. The site plan needs to anticipate this future need. Possibilities might include some two-story buildings and parking under the building. 2 . We will need more specific information on the type of exterior materials that are to be used and what measures are planned to reduce the noise impacts from the building's proximity to SR 167 . 3 . The landscape features shown on the site plan are not consistent with the landscape plan. Trees in the public right-of-way should be uniformly spaced so that other parcels can be planted in a similar manner to create a more uniform streetscape overtime. More evergreens could also be used to minimize winter bareness in other areas of the site. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 4. The drainage system to be used for the site needs to be explained in more detail. The application states that "site runoff will be collected in a city approved detention system and be discharged into the public system in the street. " We need more information about any proposed detention system, its location and the treatment system to be used. We need to know where site runoff will eventually be disposed and, if it does go into the P9 channel, whether it will be bio-filtered. We will not be able to schedule this project for ERC review pending receipt of this additional information, although we will begin routing your application to other departments for their comments. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague of this office at 235-2540. Inc e , Dona d K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DE:BG - LANCE MUELLEI LEA` OF c a gSEU ML • ASSOCIATES/ARCHIT--fS 1 130 Lakeside Suite 250 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 oATE� //�9/f7 JOB NO. 206 32 -2 ATTEENN ON �( ) 5 553 , / /14/77 TO (i // "10)i'/rT :f RE: 4e19'S WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: D Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ 6 Z )11 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION / �� ' 41.°1 /612i/erg/ _/°4,'� THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies For r t:'prrwz-I r"Or your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ • ❑ FOR BIDS DUE : 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS I i) 1 ;. 1� s— c 41 �elL D3`_ / 7_ON I NG DEPT. COPY TO SIGNED: rRoDuci 240-2 (n a/Inc,Groton,Mass 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us ce. .4�Y. o �'IITY OF RENTc N FILE NO(S): 5A - 058- e7 C0 . 6.,JLDING & ZONING, DEPART.....NT g _ psi $7 .4s ® Te4Nrc0 MASTER APPLICA i N NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME Q,�/ G n., FEES 1 S4 e. n2ut1 g fd6 50G• Q • REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS �•'� /ff 4 //.e 5//✓6 Sr Z .. ® - ..,SPECIAL PERMIT* .,:..0 TEMPORARY PERMIT* CITY ZIP "''0 " CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* / !!!!! SITE PLAN APPROVAL ,TELEPHONE • . 2S 2 Ss-3 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND F.LLL.. No. of Cubic Yards: VARIANCE* CONTACT PERSON F?am section= NAME „ • .. . . .,. * Justification Required ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: " I /a G"/Les//30 CITY G ZIP 0 TENTATIVE PLAT ,77Z �ie' . 7 ® PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE 0 FINAL PLAT g�y.,,s ---Z r3 D... WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS; NAME PLAT NAME; �/V/1?/�/LGD 1 ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT; 0 PRELIMINARy CITY .. ZIP 0 „ _r_ �,g,47r j aJ#41-. 9 4r/.f FINAL P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE i 7� 7 — l 2 5 0' l Residential 0 Industrial 0 Commercial 0 Mixed LOCATION MOBILE. HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS i �47.455/A _ e./ Q TENTATIVE EXISTING USE N PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY 6(l // / � PROP05ED USE PARK NAME: 0I G� NUMBER OF SPACES; ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW C01#IITTEE SQ. FT. ACRES AREA: 2 6p0 2- S/ I C //S3 TOTAL FEES i, 76,5TAF•F USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE.PROCESSING DATE STAMP \- L'•} `-- ?.: L4±1 APPLICATION • r,APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: v ' v�v 1 0 Accepted • :,: -'`,'• _ - - , C/ZC"d1NG DEPT. ® Incomplete % Noot4fication Sent On By: 3�., (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY-: r\\0\5\ ' APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 0 Accepted • Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: , m � Building © Design Eng. El Fire 4E:1 Parks ® Police ®! Policy Dev. ' Traffic Eng. ® Utilities REVISED 1-31-84 lance mueller associates architects June 25, 1987 CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPT. 200 Mill Ave. So Renton, Washington 98055 Re: RENTON CAMPUS Dear Sir: Renton Campus is an office complex designed for the small office user. The project will consist of two single story office buildings in the first phase, with an area of 10,000 square feet and 17,500 square feet. The second phase will consist of a single story office of 32, 120 square feet (Phase II A). The building will be constructed of tilt—up concrete, red concrete tile roof and tinted exterior glazing. All concrete surfaces will be painted in light color. The site plan will feature significant landscaping and parking for 284 cars. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS Dion Young DY:nk 130 lakeside• suite 250 • seattle,washington 98122[208]325-2553 lance mueller ale,cei•senior associates:robert olscheweky,eileen furney associates:robert fadden,michael gelbraith,richard harnish,robert wells a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by and under the supervision of registered architects SUMMARY OF RENTON PLACE BUILDING SETBACK COMPLIANCE Setbacks from East Valley Road In the M-P zone, Renton Code Section 4-730(c)4.a. requires minimum setbacks of 60 feet from arterial streets such as East. Valley Road, except where the lots are shallow (i.e. , 300 feet or less in depth as measured perpendicular to the street) , in which case the minimum setback must be at least 20% of the lot depth. The minimum setback required by this rule is illustrated on the site plan. Since all three of the proposed buildings are at least 60 feet from the east margin of East Valley Road, the proposal satisfies the zoning code's setback requirements for building setbacks from East Valley Road. Setbacks from SR 167 The M-P zone's. "Other Yards" setback provisions, Section 4- 730(c)4.b. , require that " [a]ll buildings or structures be located a minimum of twenty feet (20') from all other property lines, including limited access highways. " _ However, the M-P zone's "Flexible Setbacks" provisions, which are contained in Section 4-730(c)4.f. , provide for the reduction or elimination of a rear setback when such setback is adjacent to a public street if the front setback is increased accordingly. Presumably, this flexibility is limited by the Freeway/Arterial Street Setback Restrictions of Section 4-716, which require a minimum 10 feet landscaped setback from a limited access highway property line. The rear setback reduction provision of Section 4- 730(c) 4.f. is applicable to the Renton Place project rear setback because the project's rear yard abuts a limited access highway, SR 167, and because, for purposes of Section 4-730 (c) 4.f. , a limited access highway is not a "public street." That limited access highways are not to be considered streets for purposes of the Flexible Setbacks provision is clear from the fact that the M-P zone's . "Other Yards" provisions encompass setbacks from limited access highways, as the following excerpt from Section 4- 730(c) 4.b. illustrates: b. Other Yards: All buildings or structures shall be located a minimum of twenty feet (20' ) from all other [i.e. , non-street] property lines, including limited access highways. (Underlining added. ) Thus, because the rear setback reduction provision of Section 4-730(c)4.f. applies, and because of Section 4-716's , minimum 10 foot setback requirement applicable to limited access Page 1 of 2 A` highways in all zones, the minimum setback from the SR 167 right- of-way is 10 feet, provided that the front setback has effectively been increased accordingly. Since, by simple examination of the site plan, the west edges of both Buildings 1 and 2 lie more than 10 feet east of the building setback from East Valley Road that is otherwise required by Section 4- 730(c) 4.a. , the front setback for these two buildings has in fact been "increased accordingly" as to those two buildings. As designed, Buildings 1 and 2 in their entirety lie at least 10 feet from the SR 167 right-of-way and thus meet the zoning code setback requirements for those two buildings. Building 3 lies well in excess of the ordinary 20-foot setback requirement from SR 167 and thus satisfies the setback requirement without resort to the Flexible Setbacks provisions. (As an additional comment to the application of the Flexible Setbacks provisions to Buildings 1 and 2, Section 4- 730(c) 4.f. specifies that " [t]he site plan decision shall be based on a finding that, with reduced setbacks the architectural design, building orientation, circulation, noise and glare of the proposed project will be compatible with adjacent uses. " This clearly will be the case because the adjacent use here is a limited access highway. Further, the rear setback reduction makes possible the attractive, stepped-rear-wall design of Buildings 1 and 2. Note that because of the stepped design, the average distance between the SR 167 right-of-way and the east faces of Buildings 1 and 2 is at least 20 feet. ) Setbacks From the North and South Property Lines The "Other Yards" setback provisions of Section 4- 730(c) 4.b. require minimum building setbacks of 20 feet from both the north and south boundaries of the Renton Place site. The proposed project complies with this requirement because Building 1 is setback much further south than 20 feet from the site's north boundary and because Building 3 is setback much further north than 20 feet from the site's south boundary. Lance Mueller & Associates Architects AIA June 24, 1987 Page 2 of 2 SUMMARY OF RENTON PLACE BUILDING SETBACK COMPLIANCE Setbacks from East Valley Road In the M-P zone, Renton Code Section 4-730 (c) 4.a. requires minimum setbacks of 60 feet from arterial streets such as East Valley Road, except where the lots are shallow (i.e. , 300 feet or less in depth as measured perpendicular to the street) , in which case the minimum setback must be at least 200 of the lot depth. The minimum setback required by this rule is illustrated on the site plan. Since all three of the proposed buildings are at least 60 feet from the east margin of East Valley Road, the proposal satisfies the zoning code's setback requirements for building setbacks from East Valley Road. Setbacks from SR 167 The M-P zone's "Other Yards" setback provisions, Section 4- 730(c) 4.b. , require that " [a]ll buildings or structures be located a minimum of twenty feet (20' ) from all other property lines, including limited access highways. " However, the M-P zone's "Flexible Setbacks" provisions, which are contained in Section 4-730(c) 4.f. , provide for the reduction or elimination of a rear setback when such setback is adjacent to a public street if the front setback is increased accordingly. Presumably, this flexibility is limited by the Freeway/Arterial Street Setback Restrictions of Section 4-716, which require a minimum 10 feet landscaped setback from a limited access highway property line. The rear setback reduction provision of Section 4- 730(c) 4. f. is applicable to the Renton Place project rear setback because the project's rear yard abuts a limited access highway, SR 167, and because, for purposes of Section 4-730(c) 4 . f. , a limited access highway is not a "public street. " That limited access highways are not to be considered streets for purposes of the Flexible Setbacks provision is clear from the fact that the M-P zone's "Other Yards" provisions encompass setbacks from limited access highways, as the following excerpt from Section 4- 730(c) 4.b. illustrates: b. Other Yards: All buildings or structures shall be located a minimum of twenty feet (20' ) from all other [i.e. , non-street] property lines, including limited access highways. (Underlining added. ) Thus, because the rear setback reduction provision of Section 4-730(c) 4.f. applies, and because of Section 4-716's minimum 10 foot setback requirement applicable to limited access c • Page 1 of 2 1, , j'. p rl i 1 ']', . is E� •''' DJ y; -1. ..J highways in all zones, the minimum setback from the SR 167 right- of-way is 10 feet, provided that the front setback has effectively been increased accordingly. Since, by simple examination of the site plan, the west edges of both Buildings 1 and 2 lie more than 10 feet east of the building setback from East Valley Road that is otherwise required by Section 4- 730 (c) 4.a. , the front setback for these two buildings has in fact been "increased accordingly" as to those two buildings. As designed, Buildings 1 and 2 in their entirety lie at least 10 feet from the SR 167 right-of-way and thus meet the zoning code setback requirements for those two buildings. Building 3 lies well in excess of the ordinary 20-foot setback requirement from SR 167 and thus satisfies the setback requirement without resort to the Flexible Setbacks provisions. (As an additional comment to the application of the Flexible Setbacks provisions to Buildings 1 and 2, Section 4- 730(c) 4.f. specifies that " [t]he site plan decision shall be based on a finding that, with reduced setbacks the architectural design, building orientation, circulation, noise and glare of the proposed project will be compatible with adjacent uses. " This clearly will be the case because the adjacent use here is a limited access highway. Further, the rear setback reduction makes possible the attractive, stepped-rear-wall design of Buildings 1 and 2 . Note that because of the stepped design, the average distance between the SR 167 right-of-way and the east faces of Buildings 1 and 2 is at least 20 feet. ) Setbacks From the North and South Property Lines The "Other Yards" setback provisions of Section 4- 730 (c) 4.b. require minimum building setbacks of 20 feet from both the north and south boundaries of the Renton Place site. The proposed project complies with this requirement because Building 1 is setback much further south than 20 feet from the site's north boundary and because Building 3 is setback much further north than 20 feet from the site's south boundary. Lance Mueller & Associates Architects. AIA June 24, 1987 Page 2 of 2 RECi iV' Eu APR 2r1987 jarygi!Ierlino LANCE uE''EASSOC. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. 9125-10th Avenue South 762-9125 Seattle,Washington 98108 April 27, 1987 City of Renton Building & Land Use 200 Mill Ave. Renton, WA 98055 Gentlemen: Attached is our Proof of Ownership, per your request. Included is the following: (a) TAX STATEMENT (b) TITLE REPORT (Parcel "A" is Property) This ownership consists of AnMarCo (previously Gary Merlino Construction) , which is a partnership of Gary Merlino and Don Merlino. The address of this partnership is 9125 - 10th Avenue South, Seattle, Washington 98108. If you are in need of further information or assistance, please contact me. Sincerely, Anita West AW:jao Enclosures „ • L. Page 2 Order No. 854627 VESTED IN : GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a partnership , as to Parcel A, (See Notes 2 and 3) ; and GARY M. MERLINO and DONNA M. MERLINO, husband and wife , and DON J . MERLINO and JOAN P . MERLINO, husband and wife,, doing business as GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a partnership , as to Parcel B; - continued - ^ Page 3 Order No. 854627 1 DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: That portion of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. , lying Westerly of the West margin of Primary State Highway No . 5 and lying Easterly of the East margin of the East Valley Highway ; EXCEPT the Northerly 100 feet thereof; Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. PARCEL B : The South 3/4 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. ; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying East of the West line of Primary State Highway #5 as conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under Recording No. 5363053 ; AND EXCEPT that portion lying West of the Easterly margin of the East Valley Highway; Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. - continued - Transamerica Transamerica Title Insurance Company 1l Title Services . Please address correspondence to the office checked below: g ❑ BELLEVUE MAIN • 10635 N E 8111 St Perk Place Boa 1493 6th Ave al Unrvers'ty St • Bellevue WA 98009 Seattle WA 98101 (206)451.730i (206)628-4676 Transamerica No. : 854627 Seattle(206)678.4654 Customer No . : --- Peoples Financial Center 411 108th Avenue N.E. #200 Seller : --- Bellevue, WA 98004 • Buyer/Borrower: Gary Merlino �.�ttn: Anita Construction Company REGISTERED LAND PRELIMINARY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Washington Land Title Association Form Amount Premium Sales Tax Total Commercial Rate ( ) Owner's standard coverage ( ) Purchaser's standard coverage • ( ) Mortgagee's standard coverage • ( X) Mortgagee's ALTA coverage $2 , 000, 000 . 00 $3 , 703'. 00 $ 299. 94 $4, 002 . 94 ( ) Tax Registration • • ( ) Total • Date: May 13, 1985 at 8 : 00 A.M. $4, 002 . 94 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY agrees to issue on request and on recording of any appropriate documents, its policy or policies as applied for, with coverage as indicated, based on this pre- liminary commitment that tide to the property described herein is vested on the date shown above in - - as hereto attached - subject only to the exceptions shown herein and the terms, conditions and exceptions contained in the policy form. This report and commitment shall have o force or effect except as a basis for the coverage specified herein. BY• - Title Officer F service on this order, call : 451-7314 Jed Clawson, Robert L. Iverson or Rose Bouloumpas • - continued - • liytlt tilgol+1otl should Wilk to d i nthi. 1t then).oto org tottsitei itatotiotiott, l oitiInd ICt i or construction charges for sewer,water or electricity. 't 0110 the eve II IVUNtitetioot fails to rlrsHr, eM ra+rtrellaliamor Ire will he ehoteeeel for serrirer �� -k '34 rendered hi accordance with our rate schedule. SEE REVERSE SIDE 1987 REAL ESTATE TAX STATEMENT PROPERTY TAX RP10 KING COUNTY,STATE OF WASHINGTON ACCOUNT NUMBER 165zCURRENT BILLINGDISTRIBUtTION CURREN•TBILLINGINFORMATION:T H 302305-9103-09410 ® State School Support.. . 11028.08 Land-Value— . 271,700 / Local School Support... 621. 79 Improvements • 156183A \ County 499.81 Less:TAXABLE VA• LUE 9%%�® City . 1,077.47 271,700 A CDC C{ Unincorporated/Road .. Levy Rate 12.77302 t • ti-� Port 110. 89 General Tax 3,47310...4453 .1 "� - l ('• Fire Special Assessment �'• Sewer&/or Water Surface Water Mgt. _ - BRING ALL PARTS WHEN PAYING IN PERSON 0s Library TOTAL CURRENT BILLING 31 501.88 " Other 64. 46 Omitted Taxes ........ Emergency Med Svc.... 67.93 o T Special Assessment .... 31.45 Y . I�IERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO Surface Water Mgt. .... _ TOTAL CURRENT BILLING _ ., --- 86P TOTAL CURRENT BILLING ~> 3i S1,1.Sg INCLUDING OMITS ,, , 3,c011.88 — 8630 FAUNTLEE CREST SOUTHWEST TOTAL ^� S EATT LE W A First half must be paid or postmarked DELINQUENCY INFORMATION . by April 30 or FULL AMOUNT BE• INTEREST COMES DELINQUENT and accrues YEAR BILLING PENALTY LOT s • `. BLOCK 'CODE SEC. 'TWPt- RG. interest and penalty as prescribed by law. If first half paid by April 30 3 0—2 3—0 5 9103 2110 30 23 05 second half must be paid by October POR NW 1/4 . OF NE 1/4 LY WLY OF 31 or it becomes delinquent and W MGN OF PRI1ARY_. FULL AMOUNT ST HWY # 5 a LY penalty. accrues interest and pe nalty. ELY OF E IIGN - OF EAST VALLEY HWY PAID APRILMAY BE SWM • LESS N 100 FT — �_ .._=-_.r...-..- DELINQUENTTOTAL ,- 1 1, TQ.TALCURRENI? 3,501.88 `AND=DELINQUENTS _ `;:DETACH THIS PORTION=AND'N1AIL I l��<f. ,,d;;- -1987 :REAL"ESTATE TAX',1':'' [� U��.i Q - _ . 'WITH YOUR PAYMENT .:°;'.` ::.., • payment `±KING COUNTY,STATE OF:WASHIN.GTON, 'DELINQUENT:PAYMENTS:RECEIVED WITHOUT `.,PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT-NUMBER 2 E,98104 2387 INT.EREST-AND PENALTY WILL BE RETURNED 500 FOURTH AVENUE,SEATTL — Your cancelled.check our receipt., `. °r 302305 9y Make check payable to:KING COUNTY'FINANCE OFFICE.03 09 E. ,°urc y • -J - TAX -TAX OMIT INTEREST PENALTY FULL AMOUNTC HALF AMOUNT * SECOND HALF PAYMENT BECOMES•DELINQUENT:' `.•-% TYPE YEAR YEAR TO: (SEE REVERSE) : .::AFTER OCTOBER.31st. Current }�7 1,750.94 If, you "did not. make..a I first payment and/or pay'all- of the• Omitted delinquencies listed above, call (206).344-3850 for delinquent---:` talc, interest and penalty due. .. - swM .. .- ..-. _ Oelin- _ GARY C1ERLINO CONSTRUCTION CO swM H 8630 FAUNTLEE CREST SOUTHWEST . SEATTLE WA - 98116 PAY Till 5 AMOUNT" DUE OCTOBER 31 1,750-.94 30230591030900017509402 LANCE MUELLER ILIUM[ OF UMMSF rna ASSOCIATES/ARCHITEI _ 130 Lakeside Suite 250 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 DATE 5. / jJOB No. (206).325-2553 ATTENTIO �j%, TO 4/ /��'2i/ I/t�J��/ /'1 zd / as • _ WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: O Shop drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications 0 Copy of letter 0 Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION /ZS�fj-7 /967 L )� T/a1/ ,4h�,�,y ,e4a4 sizz til f Kfrie/hfic07 ,74- /44-� 1fl J -2/6 z A/# . L t fZ d6,,,e7/a2V _c s THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution 0 As requested 0 Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment 0 ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Nri DEPT- COPY TO SIGNED: PRODUCT 240.2 / Ee$/Inc,Groton,Mas.01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. • OF NA, ECF: J ger-D53--s'7 4$ o City of Renton t.u: no • o9R ers ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST so SE PI Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some. basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nbnproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: tO ti Os 2. Name of applicant: 6Afky � Ib+�S €�� S��o Wes 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact erson. ktot . / of t.5 .�. ` PPS-0 4. Date checklist prepared: 4:-20- 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. rU ,5Adolue. eV-(000 17k-k 1\4PS; ?0,,,\‘s otz, 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. i P W IPcFpw vo row 44 6- l v eoo, ' ' CAL Pa 2 t OtOQ 11 I I � QLe -14-11 ?txo Pr 6'. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. IQ(7 hC 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, • if known. Ps Pi 1"�6 !rota. (}n t,..t"t°1 s (v 60061)2-1,74-1 1 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. 6 e,5. kris Ne*s 12. Location of the'proposal. Give sufficient information fora person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. GCS h Le-tot, . rt+ .rr . i6 L06ATE �.D E SAL te- IGRWAN't PorzT4 '44, Mot— 'W, B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . b. What is the steepest slope on the-site (approximate percent slope)? s c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. ork g,, 6 i- 1 e. Describe the purpose. type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. f LL p�-` i,\L �JI�., 156 k4rivreD `co 6u 1..)Kmektz. Ppgv1Nfp $u1tr1�1�P� -x. V/o1.4.• t.. o Gom6wr Oc -rop o1�1 r'o1 f. Cou�'dr�sitn egcur�s a-result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. '('34.4 t,,1ionl•, '1$E► V t-5.61Tp-f'lo p ri1 69-O b 40A 1, 5-(6-ri�,A ` lS ,I) P1,P g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: • C 6H pql� 0. ‘16 3 6,60-f L- e-p,64.7 1r�/tlob e.Aarrioue u12-110G. CAG 7 ucA1oc'J 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. . ,pv4,-r VG111 LL,5 'AIM trob 100.5 1�1s O'1,W12-- IOU 12-1/-) Peo 0C.1"/0 , A VV`L b. Are there any o f-site sourcds`bf err ss on? O&v&opt'�Jr c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 001\1 6 • 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Ota1S • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the'described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. �0 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description. purpose, and approximately quantities if known. kJO 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn. or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. 2)' Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable). or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NC\.3 • c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal. if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. • 61-VC RuLI ®F1' W9 56 Lo1.6661r t iA G I' poor ue.0 A5T6),rnoto t6 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally, describe. -.4 - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: f' �161106 ev rre 1-1-k5 00 V065-rwrioi.3 , k jur is % ®r 'rN611'5. lOp P )ioo,L) 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other o Shrubs X, grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? M ion 1\12-6 OP &aisteo Nei!LA.. 12. -)1 dye c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve, or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: (ve, �4\10 $p ‘4,0 lr)6 1 Pole d App o 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other C./11 1112.0 S Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. N6 t� c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. 5 • -d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: P\PO I 1"da O PTAs i ?wipe -P-I6 1 12.a g. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. sq,,,, -c„fory2.46,11---i —\1„11 ‘..q.„ tj‘ze.) &lad .61ja t Cal rri. —\ e LI L • &- U‘ rap 600(.4 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Jo • c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 6,t2 k pt..1 AP C iS W rriri 1 v t R®)-) o� NelP614 ►J&TDB ‘-iTPf123-. +E P 4--( 600 6, 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. • 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:. K.)0 0 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? ?• - 6 - • ' 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. cop -rfZounoto V l-t-Q W e LL, Carovyr 001106 Dint C, '1-446 toaL,61 12-0/./neb A i . "016 o ii10co P‘e,6 044,1)1p/at2 drora. V6(. i l 6 Po�66 � I►t,Lo, .:�� (�,6� 150., ' 1'ii a ►u�-'4 Houvb 1d®vL,0 we € k` 7a' ,0- -- 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? \ b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. c. D scribe any structures on the site. QOpJi d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? NONE • - -e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Oar k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: PaPr - 7 - 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 6,011 p A oc-6 d tilt /Viol-4 4,4\ex,,,5 a4P1 PedSS 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 6/..., 4 air b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? 000/6 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 11. _.Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? O l tite.„(-tr p� b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? . c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? yvb • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: \AM-L. 1 01110.0 Loo 610°1/412Z i,#) tle*P i 6Hor IA6 I1e4...rccoor<00 - 8 - • 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportu ities are in the immediate vicinity? lisrma.bp_rbpio -rof Lop,�A---c b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so. describe. 'kit) c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: ' 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state. or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. go06 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Poo. Art- c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: ‘Ja1..)5 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. k'-r V use k-/ ( 42pp Ave '7 — b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? yes 1rti o e) , ' c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? S.LA ofxr5 000 — tom'' 2b 4 'f L Ls P i- B' t !-o 0 ifr Of e d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). • - 9 • ' e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air tral portation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. s.‘"rti.1 Ara Trod, f6 DAY. ?6ABc. awe iri24 B g. Proposed measures t• reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NoP6 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. 't(7. P9416140 tA I Pot.I tic (5c 'B00 EIS zosve.s.1 Pit 1\Urfr GP12-6 . _ _b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities a. C' le u1 ilities c rre -1 Y a `ai a le"at theu's'te: eql�ctricit� , na�tu al , water refuse sere ce re hond, anitar sew r septic m other. ��_� Y P Y b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.1 GUNN6LT �Ibs✓ lb Av,d\IUr r L riLoT6 Vhi...1.„ ea C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Q.(1tait± Name Printed: t V • - 10 - #176 11-8-84 • CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN •'* * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE: "4/7-40/ APPLICANT: 4f '1`06/66-#i0 .41G/4T7--5 APPLICATION NUMBER: . The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code. Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER po. 80X234 3°z-3 s- 10 4/7a/ /yam � - f'p iPz/Ari'/coM '-' Z�36O G/�t/,0,�1/� 50� 3 a 236.S9G�6 L1�s ir1/� diA/Tpn; aI. f,411v.g`hr,1, 29447 • IA1IE)/ 30 3aSr-a9 g Ta,� .� . q40�� lr-��` iyy.- oa s��°°�s 4''I/h ( �46/vrr# ,-2'91/ 5T v41 £4rZ'/ /01 4eP,s3,06". izegraw /`''f'usrq °'� or'7/0 3 .t e704ea`Yr./Yb4 L 5 4302 • • ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • • • 1 • • • • • CERTIFICATION I. /O?l,/ YOZ/Ic/�, hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. s. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for the. State of.Washington residing at h J1-7 on the a-577 day of d iVE: i e.7 SIGNED: CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I. . hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on . to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington residing at • , on the day of • • SIGNED: • • FORM 208 c, Y 1/' 2149N ENtiIRONMENTAI- CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEEN REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: July 17, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: July 31, 1987 EFC - 053 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-058-87 • PROPONENT:.__Eancp Mueller and.&s riatec PROJECT TITLE: Renton Campus BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Site Plan Approval for two single story office buildings 10,000 sq. ft. and 17500 sq. ft. (pha§e one)and one siriyle sLory 32,120 sc . IL. uffice bhdse Lwu ) .PrujecL includes pdrking for 284 cars. LOCATION: On East side of East Valley Highway North of S.W. 27th Street at the 2300-2700 Block of East Valley Road. SITE AREA: 5.6153 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 244,602 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 053 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-058-87 PROPONENT : LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON CAMPUS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR TWO SINGLE STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS 10,000 SO. FT AND 17500 SO. FT. (PHASE ONE) AND ONE SINGLE STORY 32,120 SQ. FT. OFFICE (PHASE TWO) . PROJECT INCLUDES PARKING FOR 284 CARS. LOCATION : ON EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY NORTH OF S.W 27th STREET AT THE 2300-2700 BLOCK OF EAST VALLEY ROAD. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : [7 UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT I ( BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M, ON JULY 31,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 , II DAVID L. I±IALINEN 1 1 'Attorney At Law 1 Plaza Center Building Suite moo. logo°Northeast Eighth Street I, (206)454-8272 Bellevue,Washington 98°04 ' . - i 1 ati 1/cle - 6/1 P)4jnf-‘2117 .;- -(Y-u -s— (-c-jc'-';' --' . 6135kiz .6 7/9 - O` ,ir .4 '�"`-tee' '�,; , `� a. he. &be,,_,_,1 -w-c,a0„.... .L. rh:44..„ q c - „ . --I11"%-c-a,og, --(-4----%4-4-44 -cte4 4.00.,c1/4_4Th 4.(.A.0.AJ,...K.I..._ - - 1 <It- ,)"\-&-%--,v .... -ID \l-o-A -- -PA.fat. prett4 ei,:k.tiL, ,I.ct,,,..liza.,._•