Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA87-071 MEMORANDUM To Date 1, 1°�`6a From S-Q-\. Subject •DES �(3•3 �.v, ,� , s►� ��\-a7 ow1'`Q2vS a h• C60 b �r9 0� o� Lpcv�cy J ri Yn ,o,.`��--• _�J -)-(As i 0 0 • 366 . 50 + 425 . 00 + 124 . 00 + 915 . 50 -� . I l 0 o I. 91 -"Q,: f : i ; ,n,:e e rvv // ' , < o Ir / I I'l` /l I s / r .-----��I•I` _.__ \1 , , L _,J ,l' 1 { oaa e�od F - k✓vr _� :p',.,.\\Hi�. - arxr . Tix.. rr" -- c6 V INDUSTRIAL i PARK I_I R,�. 11 _I_ s i 1 Ji T 1.RENTON IC I • \`\ \\ \\\.c'lA 3 1, �I m I p L I •N -.G T O V N • N PO R T H E R YN m S ill o 'Il 0 _ W0 1 R IBA L PARK A R K R E N T 0 N a f1 `...o c ' s ql DJ 5 /o,.d 0 it, Z ` " '' I'a= = I 141 z LIRE AVE. _• �• s c ;11t1 . A Ifl , e n ? R mE P'0 L A T N .1e E • r,ii� r; " .,=-=---:-- —'1 -"-i'"--::1:---- I.'--- ,----!-::;--r,--: 2 l'ili O N AN O R T H E R N}1 OR I L L 1 A _ elJn e :F ,III --- ---- —--—-- •I — ..'gym"l, YII IL '1111' P A'R K 0'F R ON T O"N D I',V. 15 III II .:.I --- --- --- - -- - -- -- - - - 'i ,._._._•pc„—..._—_- _.—.__. ___'.-_.EAST_•--•VALLEY =�PD: _—_.—'+reGa- II_ lance mueller ������ c.� ,�uu�d..w" A ,°e,\ & a::oclatcBh RENTON WANGTitects aia S W 271h STREET 2 e 3a IeFeeide•eeeccla ws.M1.a9tee ¢Oe 3¢a¢a63 tlece A ne evlelon INIMMINIMIIM—r 13 T I ? ? I = c `. ,. ? (1) / . . mom. --r- IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11IIIIIIIIIII—IIIIIIliii11111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII_II'_' „_ .^4, -"e . .2.M. o oe�E �. fflohlo�l L. • ••AM.�E M.o�.t..�o�!o�.Pgo•Moo�. OEM.M M MR 0 4 K5 — u p al _E--•-' A ' S:'-- T'•, Y rE-' L E V AT ION - Nlij I I I I I Z • aNI W E S __ T ELEVATION Ir o Q 4 Q Q 0au z 0 cc \ - — - h ~ N O R T H ELE V AT I 0 N ~ w .. .. w I q ? q q q p o - 1 I I I- nrw w. �nr o..>..m.e M L . I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 Z- ,_._...-...:.. SOUTH EL E V AT ION .. - CI n • m 0 yal m U nm d m i7 c CIC)L e m to'O z 7U o CO mO _ a C J • W <No ConsultantsEarth Inc. Geotechnical Engineers,Geologists U Environmental Scientists August 17, 1987 E-3453 Alaska Distributors Company 4601 - 6th Avenue South '`..., „� 1 Seattle, Washington 98108 -- \_ l i . (I ,t • Attention: Mr. Alex Schulman j111�� A'-' � ' - Gentlemen: '� '' � r '. .//"," ,; • This letter. transmits four copies of our geotechnical engineering study for your proposed new office/warehouse facility at the subject site. We proceeded with our services on the basis of your July 2, 1987 written authorization. The soils underlying the proposed development area comprise _ primarily loose soft organic silts, clayey..silts and silty sands 1 : with occassional peat interlayerings at relatively shallow depths. These materials, which extend to .'a ;depth of about :' :<,' : seventeen and one-half (17-1/2 ) feet below existinggrade, -are ' highly susceptible to compression under load. This is typically :.reflected in the form of structure settlement. • Based on the encountered conditions, and the results of our analyses, we believe there are two practical and economical means - , of supporting the structure available to you. These are: • to support the structure on conventional footings bearing on • compacted structural -fill after successful completion of a preload surcharge program, or • to support the structure on. a driven timber pile and concrete grade beam foundation system. These foundation support alternatives, along with other geotechnically related aspects of the project are discussed in more detail in the text of the attached report. We appreciate this opportunity to have been of service to you during this initial phase of project, development, and we look forward to working with you in future phases as the project comes M1 1805 136th Place N E,Suite 101,Bellevue,Washington 98005 Bellevue(206)643-3780 Seattle(206)464-1584 222 E.26th Street.Suite 103,P.O.Box 111744,Tacoma,Washington 98411.9998 Tacoma(206)272.6608 . • Alaska Distributors Company V E-3453 - _August 15, .1987 VV Page Two • • to fruition. In the meantime, should you or your consultants have any questions about the content of this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please call. • Very truly yours, CONSULTANTS, INC. N G1 Mann, P. E. • • • Vice-President = - STL/GM/cac - - . .• • . . • • • • n • -; •c • " r n_re. *•"_E • . -••• • , - - _ • • - • ' - ••• - - • , - - ) ' ' s - - • — • • - • • • • -•- • • Earth Consultants, Inc. • • . . c _-. — -_- _- GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED OFFICE/WAREHOUSE SOUTHWEST 27th STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON INTRODUCTION Project Description . The subject site is located along the northern side of Southwest :• 27th Street in Renton, Washington approximately as shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1. The purpose of this study is to explore ? the existing subsurface conditions at the site, and on this basis to develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed site development. - The proposed office/warehouse is _to be :,a two-story ::concrete. '. 'masonry building with a slab-on-grade floor. The majority of the _:. :structure will be constructed on dock-high fills. Approximately -seven feet of fill will be needed to bring the site to .:its • , planned elevation and to achieve design floor elevation. Paved parking, truck 'access and turning area will be provided along the -. southern and eastern sides of the `building. The area to the north will be available for future expansion. According to the structural engineer,f maximum total dead plus live loads are expected to be as follows: • Wall loads - 3 kips per lineal foot • Column loads - 70 to 100 kips • slab loads - 500 pounds per square foot (psf) • • A site plan showing the proposed building and approximate boring locations is presented on Plate 2, Boring Location Plan. In the event that any changes in the nature, design or location of this project are made, we should be consulted to review the recommendations presented in this report. In any case, we recommend that Earth O0nsultants, Inc. (ECI) be retained to perform a general review of final design. Scope of Services Me performed this study in general accordance with the scope of services outlined in our June 29, .1987 proposal. On this basis, our report addresses: {` _ review of information from a previous Dames and Moore study '` r- of part of this site, :' • subsurface ::exploration of site's . ,soil and _groundwater .-:,:I :. conditions, selective laboratory tea - y tenting to characterize =$ite 'saterials, '+ w foundation support alternatives, including conventional spread footings and driven timber piles, • estimated settlement magnitudes and rates, • site preparation, earthwork and grading operations and procedures, - • • • short and long term site drainage and erosion control, and • appropriate asphalt pavement design section recommendations • — 2 — It • This report has been prepared for specific application only to this project in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area. It is provided for the exclusive use of Alaska Distributors Company, and their representatives. No warranty is expressed or implied. We recommend that this report be included in its entirety in the project contract documents. . ... SITE CONDITIONS Surface The site is located along the northern side of Southwest 27th Street in Renton, Washington approximately one mile east 'of the - Green River in the Green River ':flood `:plain. 'The ..property -i s • `'bordered on the east byOlympic Pipeline 'mom amy and Mobile Oil ` !- _ Corporation tank farm facilities, and on the north and west by ~} undeveloped property covered with grass . and shrubs. .Between the • site and the tank . farms is _a .moderaterly deep man-made drainage channel containing Springbrook Creek. t. t • The site is generally level, but is approximately four feet lower in elevation than the Southwest 27th Street right-of-way. The :" surface is covered with grasses and by' numerous Madrona and Alder saplings. Subsurface Our exploratory borings encountered three generally distinct soil stratum (layers) , which are described below: _ ._ ._._. - 3 - ' � r • I Stratum "I-Fill: (0 to . 7-1/2 feet) This layer is a fill predominantly composed -of dense, brown to gray gravelly sand containing Scattered cobbles. Approximately 10 percent of the fill material passed the No. 200 mesh sieve. 'The fill has a moisture c - - antent ranging between about 7 to 18 percent, and is presently firm and competent. Stratum- II-Silt: (7-1/2 to 17-1/2 feet) This stratum consists of very soft to soft brown to gray organic silt, clayey silt, and silty sand with ' interbedded peat. The silt samples tested exhibit an average moi • sture isture content of 48 percent, a liquid limit of 34 to 68 percent, and a plasticity index of 4 to 8 perceht. The interbedded peat sample tested has an average woi• %ture content of 178 percent. These materials are _ - _highly compressible under load. Stratum""-IIi-Sand; (17-1/2 to 54 :feet) :This layer comprises -J'`• : _ primarily �i um dense to: dense gray-black :silty fine sand to ' fine sand. The 'upper fifteen (15) feet of this stratum ..' contains s%beral thin silt lenses. Below thirty-five (35) feet shell fragments exist within the soil matrix. This :;material 4rvears competent to suppo rt a deep :-.foundation =; • -.�= system.• More detailed descriptions of the soil conditions encountered at the exploratory borrng locations are presented on the individual - Boring Logs, P13 tes 4 through 8. The details and results of our field exploratiZn 'and laboratory testing programs are presented in the appendix, Groundwater Groundwater was encountered at depths of about four and one-half (4-1/2) to seventeen and one-half (17-1/2) feet below the existing surfac during drilling. " Groundwater levels are not - 4 - ' static, they fluctuate seasonally and because of changes in rainfall, surface water runoff, and infiltration. Your contractor should be prepared for this in the event construction occurs during the wetter winter months. In order to more accurately determine these existing site water levels, slotted three-quarter inch standpipe was installed in Borings A and D. Water level readings obtained two days after completion of drilling show the stabilized water level to be between about 5-1/2 and 6-3/4 feet below the existing surface. This level approximately matches that in Springbrook Creek to the east. DISCUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, 'it is evident the area Y of _ -. proposed development is underlain to considerable depth by loose _ or. soft and highly g y compressible `soils. ` Because of this we expect a relatively _ large amount of settlement to ':occur under - the proposed building loads. In our opinion, there are two practical and economic means of supporting the proposed structure without subjecting it : to en intolerable degree of settlement induced distortion. .. These, `options are to support the building on conventional spread footings bearing on compacted structural after successful completion of a preload surcharge program, or to support the building on a driven timbar pile and concrete grade beam foundation system. In the latter case, it is almost certain the building's floor slab will need to be a structural slab. The heavily trafficed pavement areas will need to be carefully prepared to avoid the potential for truck traffic induced damage. This typically means that in addition to performing some specific subgrade preparation, a geotechnical fabric and a thicker than normal pavement section will be required. - 5 - { • Because of the relatively shallow groundwater level it is probable you will need to install a carefully designed site drainage system. We understand the site is also subject to the City of Renton's shoreline protection requirements, and that these are presently under study by the Corps of 'Engineers. Regardless of the designed drain system, you will need to comply with these revised regulations. These and other geotechnically related aspects of the project are discussed -- "in more detail in the following paragraphs of this report. Site -Preparation and General Earthwork - Proposed site grades are approximately three feet higher than the present surface elevation. In addition, the dock high floor will require four feet of fill to support it. Fill .-material ,:used to •; achieve design site elevations should meet the requirements for • f- structural fill. Ideally, ' but 'particularly during `wet . weather, --structural ' fill ' = ` should comprise :a free-draining, granular organic free material with a maximum size of three inches. It should contain less then - • ' 3 percent fine material (silt and clay size particles passing the No. 200 mesh sieve biased on the fractfon of the material passing the No. 4 mesh sieve). During dry weather, any compactible non-organic soil may be used as structural fill. Structural fill under floor slabs and footingsshould be placed in thin horizontal lifts not exceeding ten inches in loose thickness. Each lift should be compacted to a least 95 percent of maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified -Proctor). • Fill under pavements and walks - 6 - - • • should be placed in similar thin horizontal lifts and, with the exception of the upper twelve (12) inches, compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum density. The top twelve (12) inches should be compacted to at least 95 percent maximum density. All f ill material should be placed a t or near the optimum moisture content. If the materials are too wet to be compacted to the required degree, it will be necessary to dry them or replace them with a more granular material. Fill materials can be dried by aeration or by mixing in lime or cement powder to :absorb moisture. • Foundations - . Based on the encountered site conditions and :.the preliminary building design criteria, we believe two practical and economical --- _ - 'foundation system alternatives are ` available 'to support -the 1 '.. proposed structure. 'These alternatives are: _ o conventional spread footings bearing on compacted structural ,.. `�< ; fill .after successful completion ,of a ``preload `surcharge program, or t _ o Driven timber or predrilled augercast piles and concrete .= grade beams. If you elect to use conventional footings, you must perform a preload surcharge program to induce a significant portion of the settlements likely to be caused by the proposed construction loads. The surcharge program is discussed in more detail in a subsequent paragraph. Once the preload program is successfully completed, - the conventional footings can be designed on the basis of the, following criteria: • • Allowable bearing pressure = 2500 psf • Minimum depth of perimeter footings = 18 inches • Minimum depth of interior footings = 12 inches below top of floor slab • Minimum width of wall footings = 15 inches • Minimum lateral dimension of column = 24 inches footings • Estimated post-surcharge settlement = 1 inch, or less • Estimated post-surcharge differential = 1/2 inch across settlement • - one column bay. A one-third increase in the above allowable bearing pressures can be used when considering short term transitionary wind or seismic loadings. Lateral loads can also be resisted by friction between the - foundation and the supporting _ compacted "fill 38ubgrade or by _passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of the foundations. Fbr the latter, the foundations must be poured ; _ "neat" against the existing soil. or backfilled with a compacted fill meeting the requirements of structural fill. A coefficient4 !of friction of .0.35 may be used between the structural foundation - concrete and the ' supporting subgrade. The passive resistance of : well compacted fill may be taken as equal to the pressure of a fluid having a density of three hundred (300) pounds per cubic foot (pcf) . • As a precuationary measure, we recommmend drains be placed around all perimeter footings. More specific details of perimeter foundation drains are provided in the Site Drainage Section of this report. We have analysed. two pile foundation systems for axial and uplift capacities. These are a sixteen (16) inch diameter drilled in-place augercast pile, and a driven nine-inch tip diameter timber pile. In both cases the depth of penetration below existing site grade is forty-seven (47) feet. The capacities are tabulated below: Axial Uplift Pile Capacity Capacity - Type (tons) (tons) Augercast .25 - 11 Timber .: 20 _ g Greater axial and uplift capacities can be achieved by enlarging the pile diameters. -:. Resistance to lateral loads can be achieved by restraining the heads of individual piles, and by the stiffness of the piles and the restraint offered by the soils surrounding the upper portion r ..: of the piles. :`Additional resistance can be _achieved :by "a -combination of passive pressures acting on the buried portions of . -, ;; -. the concrete grade beams and the underlying subgrade. Similar ; ,' design values to those described above for conventional footings will apply. For the existing site conditions, we calculate that ;': `each reinforced augercast pile can resist a lateral load of two kips and each timber pile one kip applied at the ground surface. :We recommend your structural engineer verify the structural integrity of the selected pile system under the above lateral loads. For either pile system we estimate individual pile settlements will be on the order of one-half inch, but the majority of these settlements are expected to occur as the structural loads are applied. We believe this magnitude of movement is within the tolerable limits of the proposed structure. - 9 - Dock-High Retaining Walls - From . our earlier discussions, we understand dock-high retaining walls will be constructed along the perimeter of the building. We recommend they be designed to resist any lateral loads imposed on them. For the existing site conditions we estimate the lateral soil load to be resisted should be equal to that imposed by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of forty (40) pcf. If the wall is prevented from rotating, we recommend adding . a one hundred (100) psf uniform surcharge over the full wall height. ''''::. ' y •These values assume that no vehicular, floor or other surcharge _ loads will act on the wall. If such surcharges are to apply, they should be added to the above design lateral pressures. We assume that the walls will be backfilled with a suitable -free drainingmaterial. Typically, "'- ' -- yp y, wall backfill should consist 'of =, �,tti. materials similar to structural= fill.- - `Wall backfill shouldhave ''Z', -: . a maximum size of three inches, be organic free, -:and have a ':' = maximum of 3 percent fines (materials passing the No. 200 mesh ` ``:`` sieve) . 'Twenty-five (25) to seventy (70) percent of. . the --- particles should pass the No. 4 mesh sieve. ;,A typical wall drain k •.." ,`' detail is provided as Plate 13. :. _As an alternative to free-draining wall backfill, you may wish to consider the use -.of a geotextile drainage product such - as "Miradrain". In either case, we recommend the installation of a' drain line along the base of each wall. These drains are discussed in more detail in the Site Drainage section of this report. Slab-on-Grade Floors Slab-on-grade floors can be used with conventional foundations providing a preload surcharge ..... program is satisfactorily completed and the slab is supported on compacted structural fill. - 10 - • Any fill or native soils disturbed by construction activity should either be recompacted :or excavated and replaced with compacted structural fill "or crushed rock. To avoid moisture build-up on the subgrade, the slab should be provided with a capillary break consisting of a minimum of four inches of free draining sand and gravel. We also recommend that a vapor barrier, such as a 6 mil plastic membrane, be placed beneath the slab, but over the capillary break, to reduce both water vapor • transmission through the slab and the resultant moisture related damage to interior furnishings. Two to four inches of sand or pea gravel may be plated over the membrane for protection during construction, to aid in curing of the concrete, and to help , prevent cement paste bleeding -down into the underlying capillary break. We also recommend the floor slab be _"free-floating" so that ';:_: .future differential settlement between floor slabs, columns or - ,walls will not be reflected in the form of warped or cracked 'w!• :•-5 ;floor slabs ,..� If a pile foundation system is selected, we believe it will be necessary to design and construct :a structural floor :slab -to `,';:� '.•: •:' -accommodate the relatively high expected floor loads. "'However, • `,- r. it may be possible to simplify the slab construction by building _ up the dock-high fill so that it can act as formwork on which to • -pour the slab. Once the floor slab concrete reaches its design = strength, the continued subgrade support becomes unnecessary. . Therefore, if the fill subgrade were to settle, it will not have - a detrimental affect on the building floor slab. We understand your structural engineer has already performed a preliminary design of just such a floor slab. - Preload Surcharge Program If you elect to use conventional footings to support your proposed building, you will need-to- perform a preload surcharge 11 - program to preinduce as much of the settlement likely to be caused by the building loads as possible. To accomplish this goal, we recommend you place at least five feet of preload material over the compacted structural fill required to raise the building area grade to the proposed dock-high elevation. We also recommend you add sufficient compacted structural fill to allow for the estimated preload induced settlement, about twelve (12) inches. Based on the subsurface and laboratory test information presently available to us, we estimate this settlement should take about thirty (30)- days to complete. • Preload material has no specific criteria, unless it is to be - .. used as structual fill elsewhere on the site, except that it - • should have an in-place unit weight of no less than one hundred -and twenty (120) pcf. We recommend the preload extend at least five feet beyond the southern, eastern and western perimeters of • .-t';_ • of the building, and at least ten feet beyond the •northern _ - ^perimeter. From _this point the fill should be sloped at a gradient of 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical). The additional distance jat the northern end is to help compensate for potential effect of future construction should you elect to construct an additions• in that area. We also 'suggest as a precautionary measure, that you "roll" the surcharge onto the area of the potential future addition to preinduce settlements on this area too. This will help to reduce, if not eliminate, the affects of future development on this structure. You should also consider extending the preload over the parking lot area as described in the Pavement Areas section of this report. Because this preload fill is to cause settlement, it is necessary to monitor both the magnitude and rate of such settlement. To accomplish this, we recommend you install a series of at least eight settlement monitors over —the building area. These - 12 - settlement monitors should be placed on the existing site subgrade before any fill is placed. A typical settlement monitor is pictorially depicted on Plate 12, attached. Once installed, and while the fill is being placed and compacted, as necessary, _ the movements caused by the filling operation should be recorded. Baseline readings should be obtained as soon as the markers are installed, then readings should be acquired periodically throughout the filling and on through the subsequent weeks until either settlements cease, or the geotechnical engineer is - satisfied the settlements are within the tolerable limits of the proposed building. The readings obtained during the early filling operation are typically critical and should be taken at hourly to daily intervals, depending on the progress of the filling operation. The later readings can be obtained on a ;weekly or even bi-weekly basis. For continuity, we recommend you •� retain ECI to perform the settlement monitoring services. How- - ever, if you ::,elect to use some other entity,Y. �we strongly recommend you provide the data to ECI for review and reduction as Vrquickly after its acquistion as possible. This will tend to help :reduce the potential for misunderstanding or misinterpretation of the data ;.•,�,. , .: � .=Excavations and Slopes • While no major excavations or slope construction efforts are anticipated in construction, you should' be aware that in no case • should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts greater than four feet in height should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than 1H:1V. If slopes of this inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, or if excavations greater than four feet in depth are required, temporary shoring may be necessary. This shoring will help protect against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workmen in - 13 - • the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide geotechincal shoring design criteria, if requested. _ Site Drainage Two days after completion of our borings, recorded groundwater in Borings D and A were 5.5 and 6.8 feet below the existing site surface, respectively. - :Since site and building elevations are to be raised about three and seven feet, respectively, we do not ti .• . expect the site groundwater levels will "present any major construction related problems. however, the site ' should be graded such that surface water is directed off the site. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where buildings, slabs or pavements are to be constructed. During construction, loose .surfaces should be sealed at night by compacting the surface soils to reduce ::.the infiltration of rain into the soils.-:• .:Final - site grades should allow for drainage away from the ;building`' foundations. We suggest that the ground be sloped at a gradient • . of 3 percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the • - :.buildings except in areas that are to be paved. • If seepage is encountered in foundation or grade beam -excavations during construction, we recommend your contractor slope the bottom of the excavation to one or more shallow sump pits. The collected water can then be pumped from these pits to a positive and permanent discharge, such as a nearby storm drain. Depending. ' on the magnitude of such seepage, it may also be necessary to interconnect the shallow sump pits by a system of shallow connector trenches. If conventional spread footings are used, we recommend you -install footing, drains around the building perimeter. These drains should consist of a four inch minimum diameter perforated or slotted rigid plastic drain pipe laid at, or just below, the — 14 — • invert of the footing with a gradient sufficient to initiate flow. The drain line should be bedded on, surrounded by, and covered with a free-draining washed rock, pea gravel or other free-draining granular material. Once the drains are installed, with the exception the upper twelve (12) inches, the excavation can be backfilled with a granular fill material. The surficial twelve (12) inches of fill should consist of compacted and relatively impermeable soil. It can be separated from -the underlying more granular drainage material by a layer of building paper or visqueen. The surface should be sloped to '.drain away from the building wall. Alternatively, the surface can be sealed with asphalt or concrete -. paving. Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be connected to the footing drain system. All roof downspouts must be separately tightined " to discharge. We recommend you install sufficient cleanouts at strategic locations to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drain and downspout tightline systems. 'If subsurface drains -appear to be necessary once construction is underway, we recommend the appropriate locations of subsurface drains, if needed, be established during grading operations by ECI's representative, at which time the seepage areas, if • present, may be more clearly defined. Pavement Areas Because of the relatively high risk of fill induced settlements on this site, and the apparent need to subject a considerable.. portion of the eastern side of the site to regular heavy truck traffic, we believe long term settlements could have a detrimental affect on the site pavements. Approximately three - 15 - feet of compacted structural fill will be required to achieve the proposed design site grade. This fill alone will cause some settlement to occur. Once a pavement is installed and the heavy trucks begin to use the area, the pavement is likely to undergo a wide variety of differential settlements. Over a relatively short time this should result in pavement damage and a need for expensive maintenance. To mitigate or eliminate these potential settlement affects we recommend you surcharge 'the heavily trafficed areas of the site , at the same time the building surcharge is in place, or during _ pile driving and grade beam construction. The pavement area j surcharge need only consist of about two feet of material, and the only requirement is that the material have a unit weight of one hundred and twenty (120) pcf. ante estimate a surcharging period of about forty-five (45) days will • be adequate ` to preinduce settlements in this area. _ Once the surcharge is removed, the subgrade ` must be moisture ;conditioned, as necessary, and the :upper twelve .:112) inches •:' recompacted` to at= least 95: percent compaction (per ASTM ' - := D-1557-78). Below this level, 90 _. . • ._, percent =compaction should be ..: adequate. It is q possible that somelocalized areas of soft, wet - _ or unstable subgrade may still exist after this process. If so, they may require overexcavation of the unsuitable materials and ' their replacement with a compacted structural fill or •a crushed rock. Depending on the nature of the prepared subgrade at the time of construction, it may also be necessary to use a geotechnical fabric to separate pavement materials from the underlying subgrade and to help strengthen the pavement section. We have provided you with two alternative pavement sections for the lightly trafficed staff access and parking areas, and for the more heavily trafficed truck access and loading areas. In the more lightly loaded areas we recommend the following: - 16 - • two inches of Asphalt Concrete (AC) surfacing over four inches of Crushed Rock Base (CRB) material, or - • two inches of AC over three and one-half inches of Asphalt Treated Base (ATB) material. Because of the general nature of the site soils, and because construction is likely to be conducted in the wetter winter months, we recommend you select the ATB pavement section. This will not only provide you with a competent "blacktop" surface that will help protect the site from construction activity, but will also provide a clean, dry and competent surface on which to store and protect construction materials. It has also been our experience that in spite of its slightly higher initial ,cost, , this form of surfacing requires considerably less . -maintenance :either during or afters winter construction -period, _ _ _ _ While the use of CRB offers little advantage over the ATB from the structural viewpoint, it is significantly more susceptible to "deterioration and expensive maintenance during winter use. ' .In .: ; numerous instances this can even lead to the need for replacement • • of the CRB before paving can be accomplished because construction :traffic has forced the CRB down into the underlying subgrade. Although the use of a geotextile will help prevent such separation and contamination of the CRB, you will have to pave• over it before the building can be opened. With the ATB, it is possible to stripe and mark the material and to use it as the "pavement" so the building can be marketed. The ATB can be left _ undisturbed in-place for one or more seasons until the great majority of settlement-related movement has an opportunity to occur. Once this has occurred, any necessary maintenance can be performed and the AC surfacing installed. This should allow you to avoid the need for . any significant pavement surfacing maintenance. - 17 - • For the heavier truck traffic areas we have made some assumptions +: about site usage, pavement life and site traffic. We assumed the pavement life to be twenty (20) years, that truck traffic would be confined to one lane in each direction, and that traffic would double within the pavement life. We estimated the pavement subgrade would have an equivalent "R-Value"• of about sixty (60) . On the basis of these estimated criteria we used . the State of Washington Flexible Pavement Design Method to determine a sutiable pavement design section. As a result of this analysis, • we recommend the following. e Three inches of AC over six inches of CRB, or - - e Three inches of AC over four inches of ATB = • • In either case we suggest the pavement section be separated from = : :.r, the prepared subgrade by a Mirafi 500X geotechnical -fabric, •br-- - 1 equivalent. - If the above design assumptions appear incorrect to you, or If ;z: ; :;, you have more detailed and accurate criteria, please .provide the information to _'us so that we can reanalyze these heavier pavement sections. If we are not provided further data, we will assume `-'these data in our analysis to be correct. _- • LIMITATIONS : . . ._:; _ _ Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site - - conditions and materials observed, and selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised _ by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied. - • 18 • • The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from our exploratory borings. Soil and groundwater conditions between borings may vary from those encountered. However, the nature and extent of variations between borings may not become evident until construction. If variations then appear, ECI should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations contained in this report, and to verify or modify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. *Additional -Services • • . We recommend ECI be retained to perform a general review of the final design plans and specifications to verify that the =, earthwork and foundation recommendations ::have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction .:specifications. _ _ - _ - - - • • We also 'recommend :ECI be retained to provide :geotechnical - _ services during construction. Because : :of the settlement sensitive nature of this project, we do not accept responsibility for the performance -of the foundation or earthwork unless we are retained to review the construction drawings and specifications, { -' ; and to provide construction observation and testing services. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifica- tions or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event • i. subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the, start of construction. . 19 - • • • The following plates are attached and complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Boring Location Plan Plate 3 Legend Plates 4 through 8 Boring Logs Plate 9 Grain Size Analyses Plates 10 and 11 Consolidation Test Data Plate 12 _ _ Typical Detail of Settlement - -•. Markers • • r i. _ - Plate 13 ' : Retaining Wall Drainage and $ackfill : . " Respectfully submitted, • = EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC kizielefrt. - r. Sheldon Lynne E 'veering Geologist Glen an _ n, P. -E. - Vice-President STL/GM/cac • z • • • - 20 - . • APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION AND_ LABORATORY -TESTING Our field exploration was performed on July 7 and 8, 1987. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling five borings to a maximum depth of fifty-four (54) fee.t below the existing grade. The borings were drilled by Pacific Testing Laboratories using a truck-mounted rotary drill rig. Continuous flight, hollow stem augers - were used to advance and support the boreholes during sampling. - • The approximate locations of the borings were determined by measuring -from the southeast property corner using a nylon measuring tape. Elevations of borings were determined using a hand level with respect to a temporary bench mark, :the curb on the north side of Southwest 27th Street, as the datum. The curb :: _ - elevation :was assumed to `;be 0.0 feet. The ,_locations and , -!': '` elevations of the borings should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate , locations are shown on the Boring Location Plan, Plate 2. :.:;::_- • ;The field exploration was continuously `:'monitored : by -an .:: ;: : engineering geologist from our firm who classified the soils encountered and maintained a log of each boring, obtained representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site feafures. Slotted standpipes were installed to • - ` . the bottoms of Borings A and D to monitor groundwater levels on a long term basis, if required. All samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System which is presented on Plate 3, Legend. Logs of the borings are presented on Plates 4 through 8. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The • - 21 - - - . • - stratification lines on the -logs represent the approximate boundary between soil types. . In actuality, the transitions may be either more gradual or more severe. In each boring, Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed at selected intervals in general accordance with ASTM Test Desig- nation D-1586. The split spoon sampler was driven with a one hundred forty (140) pound hammer freely falling thirty (30) inches. In addition, a Shelby tube sampler was used to obtain less disturbed soil samples at selected depths. The number of blows required to drive the sampler for the last twelve (12) inches, or portion thereof, is called the EN-Value". This value is :used to help characterize the site materials and in performance of some engineering analyses. ODmpressive strengths of undisturbed soils were measured where : . _. .:.practical in the field with a band penetrometer. These results .- are recorded 'a t.:the appropriate sample depths :on the individual l,L' -.:- - - - - boringlogs. .. _ _ - Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and ` • returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Visual classifications were supplemented by index tests such as sieve .'analyses on :`representative samples. ' -M+loisture determina- tions were performed on all samples. Results of moisture deter- minations, together with classifications, are shown at the appropriate depth on the boring logs ' included in this report. =''' The results of two sieve analyses are illustrated on Plate 9, Grain Size Analyses. Two consolidation tests were conducted on relatively undisturbed representative samples from the Shelby tube sampler to evaluate the consolidation characteristics of the site soils. In addition, time, readings were taken at several points of loading to evaluate the time rate of settlement. The results of these tests are shown on Plates 10 and 11, consolidation Test Data. - 22 - • stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundary between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may -�, be either more gradual or more severe. In each boring, Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed at selected intervals in general accordance with ASTM Test Desig- nation D-1586. The split spoon sampler was driven with a one hundred forty (140) pound hammer freely falling thirty (30) inches. In addition, a Shelby tube sampler was used to obtain less disturbed soil samples at selected depths. The number of ( blows required to drive the sampler for the last twelve (12) ), inches, or portion thereof, is called the "N-Value". This value l ue is used to help characterize the site materials and in performance of. some engineering analyses. Compressive strengths of undisturbed soils were measured where -- _practical in the field with a hand penetrometer. These results are recorded at the appropriate sample depth's on the individual boring logs. = -- Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and ,returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. `:., _ Visual classifications were supplemented b 'T..`. PP y Index tests such - as ,:- ': sieve analyses on -representative samples. Moisture determina- tions were performed on all samples. Results of moisture deter- minations, together with classifications, are shown at the - `�: . appropriate depth an the boring logs- included in this report. The results of two sieve analyses are illustrated on Plate 9, Grain Size Analyses. Two consolidation tests were conducted on relatively undisturbed representative samples from the Shelby tube sampler to evaluate the consolidation characteristics of the site soils. In addition, time readings were taken at several points -of loading to evaluate the time rate of settlement. The results of these tests are shown on Plates 10 and ii,--Consolidation Test Data. - 22 - S. • __ E , : ,\. - i ' 1iI 1 *:.®.•'1 • _... ,.t ..IryTi...,- i\ • ; .w .. oicrX .. -r lJ it ,o �„• •.; r 20 0 s _ t 1 Nur rt. ri .i e . • ,, .t •iniinher4.:10..S'..1'.LI ".: .� E N 1; 0 N ;: a"° ',JP R . 1 • HI AEI 1 y p -�_• .,.•s,e ■r . .n -1. r•-�., :,r. ::rcwi' i.w"'__ f�TON ' -.'': i ! `.a �� �,4; .:. ..i.a 11' E .:=r �� tom•W. - -- — !Rt ill• ��•. r I •25:fmr• w.n. 1 w11� .r C�r lr • si�rE _ . f 11.1.sue _ ' t II st)1RIfT n:°'i:" a s /�� 'SW r —7— I li:T�srs tun'tr. i- -- ar •--• �drP. I _11,1 . ,ti ..„-s.... t 14 ; u. . III .....:,.-. WO.VC II 55 li .-,-:• . . . a 4 .g all e a 1. '�,"+`' ■�.a _ +, a < ; 4. 3 + - 36 t j '3, 31 -- ---� 321' �' _ gg. s -a r !rM j sr ge .,> to -. , 11 1' : -N. s . _ - MIN - n w ! �?�r1 Atw lap,Jr,, > / _ ! 190rw .• . i j, n r ITN 1. • v ,», Ada r s. . • • Cl• Reference : • • King County/ Mop 41 • By Thomas Brothers Mops 5, Doted 1986 s. .• • Vicinity Mop . _~: _ Earth i I Proposed Warehouse Consultants Inc.` i . Renton, Washington GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING I GEOLOGY Proj.No. 3453 I Date July 187 I Plate r- 11: : Yr 10 . • 1 Approximate Scale — aaa� aaa�aae,—MEM____ aaaE MUM aaa=aaaI '_ — 0 50 100 200ft. B-E ! i I f LEGEND I I B'A Approximate Location of ECI Boring, Proj. No. I-- B-C E-3453, July 1987 W I I PROPOSED WAREHOUSEI ± ® Approximate Location of cr FUTURE ADDITION Dames a Moore Boring, Job No. 10292-OO2-05, I ti ( Jan. 15, 1982 N I 3 I i Proposed Building •ui in U . 11 Proposed Future Addition r _1 l I 1) ' Reference : • Site Plan By AI Goodfellow, Architect 8 Engineer . I j ' Dated 5/5/87 1 Property Line :, � 1+. ��' ` ' I" Earth Consultants s and c..ti.g, Boring Location Plan Proposed Warehouse Renton, Washington No. 3453 . _ Proj. Date July 1 87 Plate 2 •i • • MAJOR DIVISIONS • GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL SYMBOL Gravel :11 .4 f GW Well-Graded Gravels.Gravel-Sand And Clean Gravels re:.....:...'.'... gw Mixtures.Little Or No Fines Gravelly (little or no fines) :O. :0: :•: . Gp .. Poorly-Graded Gravels,Gravel- Coarse Soils • • • ' • ' t / Sand Mixtures Little Or No Fines.'•'yp*�, - gp Soils More Than 50 Coarse Gravels With M ■ • GM Silty G avels. Co r y gm Silt MixturesFines(appreciableNeta red On amount o1 fines) GC/ Clayey Gravels.Gravel Sand No d Sieve gc Clay Mixtures 0 ° ° oo ° .� • Sand o o °°.°°,°, SW Well-Graded Sams Gravelly And Clean Sand .a.°o °O.°o �-�SW Sands. Little Or No Fines - ' Sandy 1 little or no fines) i Ott,c More Than Sods • SP / Poorly-Graded Sands. Gravelly 50'. Material - Sp Sands Little Or 'No Fines . Larger Than Mor T ^,• t� No 200 Sieve a Than 50°° Coarse SM sm Silty Sands. Sand Silt Mixtures Size Sands With Fraction Fines(appreciableWA,.Passing No.1 .S/ - Sieve amount of fines) SC Clayey Sands. Sand-Clay Mixtures mi. Inorganic Silts&Very Fine Sands.Rock Flour.Silty- ;' ,// /% nil Clayey Fine Sands-Clayey Silts w'Slight Plasticity t`' Grained And Fine Liquid Limit Silts ���rC1 CI Inorarvgaellny Clays Ssic Clays O'n Lov:G To Medium Plasstc•t)Leap. Soils Clays - Less Than 50 GaysS. ilty Clay OL Organic Silts And Organic . / . 01 Shy Clays Ot Low Piastcdy •.•' i MH Inorganic Silts.Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fine - More Than ,. . : 'i-.. - ..• . '.'..- j) 50'� Material tTth Sand Or Silty Soils Smaller Than Silts Liquid Limit No 200 Sieve And t Greater Than 50 CH Inorganic Clays Of High Size Clays CIl Plasticity. Fat Clays t ' •' I/ O Organic Clays Of Medium To High � /� On Plashcdy,Organic Silts i: ,•••x: Highly Organic Soifs - .A -•— PT • Peat. Humus. Swamp Soils - - - - pt With High Organic Contents • Topsoil . • Humus And Duff Layer . ' . ' . - I*Ir. - •- - . Fill •q•0•."P•• - Highly Variable Constituents - v' ► •♦•••••• z• - The Discussion In The Text 01 This Report Is Necessary For A Proper Understanding r Of The Nature Of The Material Presented In The Attached Logs . ; ` 1 ' Notes:-• = `.. ' ' • Dual symbols are used to indicate borderline soil classification.Upper . . • • case letter symbols designate sample classifications based upon lab- oratory testing;Jower case letter symbols designate classifications not . verified by laboratory testing. - . • I 2"0.D. SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER C TORVANE READING, tsf SHE I.D. RING SAMPLER OR qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf • II SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER P SAMPLER PUSHED W MOISTURE. percent of dry weight • SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED pcf DRY DENSITY,pounds per cubic ft. 2 WATER LEVEL (DATE► LL LIQUID LIMIT,percent aWATER OBSERVATION WELL PI PLASTIC INDEX ' ''i ii 111)# LEGEND Consultants Inc. ' GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No.3453 Date Julyt87 Plate 3 1 . . . . • . .. . • • • • ' % • . . • .• • . . . , - • BORING NO: A . . .: • • . . . . Logged By_ELL._. .-- •- ---- - -- • - . • -5"± * • Date 7-7'87 ' • • (N) US • . VI/ Graph cs Soil Description Depth Sample Blows . •. . - . . *4‘• . • . . IAN: 1/2" topnoil . . '400M SW- Gray gravelly SAND with scattered - 1 48 7 •••-••AO . 104040 SM cobbles, moist, dense (fill) ••••• .-- 5 • i 26 14 • • • • • . PUSH 225 • • ' I . ml Brownish-gray clayey SILT with scattered 105Z I PUSH 115 LL=46 organic matter, moist, soft PUSH 54 PI= 8 -..-,„-i.• • Gray sandy SILT, wet, loose . - I . . . . 15 • -. . . . - . .- • . . • 23 •• - 35 •• • ',.. .• • .• •!.:-:::-;•:•:•;•1.: . • 24 • ,- • :,:;:•:1:1:,:.:0:.:•: . • - • . . - - • - — 20 • '-1:-...:,•:, ' -- W*;::* sin Black fine SAND, wei, medium dense ... •„. • . • . • . -:.k.':NTMy. :•:!:!:!...?...rt:': • • . - : . .• ' . . ow • Na:7 -tr-Scrrgh7:15-65iFf-Cgray interlayered clayey- I 8 53 qu=0.25tsf B 1:1 lit, SILT, organic silt & sand, wet, very soft... 25 . ..•• . . .... •• ...; .., . . Black fine to medium SAND, wet, medium • ,..t.k.Y.::,:-.: sm - dense • - • - - ••• : - • •- •- 20 28 . . . • 2 --'• • ii1:::::h;1:::t: ••* . . . • - '.. :: . • . .. . . .. , - . :: z.•:••• • - 30 . , :::/:;11:::::::!: • .. . .. ' - • - - - . ' .- - ••••.'.,..:.I: ' ...-1- * :. . 3± :: 24 '-•--.,.:.f. -4,...- sin Gray clayey SAND, Nt& very soft, with • - .7711-: •:. .-:... „.. . . .-C: •-':; '.'. 7'...' -,6.44i+:44- •--- :,: :• ' •-• scattered gravel - 35 ,1.`,... -.. • ...- -' r', • _ ..... _ •:-N-:1-t.:...4 - . ' • •.. .._......, - •,!-- . 7. :•:.:•:.:,:e.,:t:.t. I .Gray silty SAND with shell fragments, : . • 14- - 21 ..:,..t.,...t.,•,.t: wet, medium dense - --7 _ - -.-- .-. .. _ . • ,..,..J...:.*:. -,. •: . - - - - - 40 •:-:-::1-;•;..-,•,-.• • ... - -• , t. . ,-. --. : .,. .- ..• . . ',:'' :.:,:,..:.:.•,:.:1:•: . . • • , -• :::::::::::::::1-t-:- • • • * - ••,. _ . .. . - - 16 22 ' .• _ . . . . . . . . '. Boring terminated at 44 feet below existing grade. . Groundwater encountered at 9.5 feet during drilling. 1" PVC standpipe* installed j, :..,-'• . • ,..' • 1 to bottom of boring. Lower 10 feet slotted. Boring backfilled with cuitings. , • -- • • • • • .• • Water level on 7-9-87 was 6.8 feet. - ' . . • . * Vertical datum unknown. Elevations determined with respect to a . . • temporary bench mark, the top of the north side of Southwest 27th Street, at an assumed elevation of 0.0 feet. • . . . . - • . • . . • . •-1-. . subsurtace conditions depicted represent our obsenosions at the time and location of this exptoratory hde modified by engineering tests.analysis.and • . judgement They ere not necessarily representative of otter times and locations We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log . . . . •....41;- • . BORING LOG• i'. k •.::1 Earth • • PROPOSED WAREHOUSE • . : • .,..-' . . . _ . • 4•, RENTON, WASHINGTON il . Consultants Inc. - GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING &GEOLOGY Proj. No. 3453 I Date July'87 'Plate 4 • •• ;',,_ • . . • . ..- •. . • • . -• . . • • • 0" . . . . . _ . . BORING NO. ' B , • . . . . .. . _._ . .. ... . __. . _ . . . ...,_ .. _ . Logged By STL ... -• _ .. -- . r. • • - ELEV. -' • .- Date 7-8-87 - - • • _ . • . - - • . • . . • US . (N) W Graph cs - . Soil Description .. D(eftp.t)h Sample Blows Ft. • (%)_ 1/2" sod . - ' - • " 0.0.:•:•:•:•: . 00 :•:•:••••• - .0 ,w....x. sw- Tan gravelly silty SAND with scattered . 38 9 • . • 0 . ,•:•:•:•:•: . Sin cobbles, dry • - . : 00 .:: * - 5 Moist below 11 , gray below 2.5' :I: 6 18 qu=1.0tsf Brownish-gray organic SILT, moist, . :I: 3 85 LL=68 . . /////, oh medium stiff . ' • . - 10 48 PI= 6 I - 123.; ///// PUSH ---• ///// • . • • . '..... //// .• Interbedded with peat .11' to 14' . - I PUSH . 252 „y, • -• . ' . . ',.. .. • ///42, : .. . . .. . .. - 15 . - 42 . "--. -; ' . z.• .• _ .- • . - - - / . . . • • SZ ' . . r..• ::.::.:*:::.:.: . . . • . , • 1 16 29 ml- Interbedded gray clayey SILT and black . • . • -',.::: .'. • - 20 . . • sm . -silty SAND, wet, medium dense . • . . . - • . . . ::::•Z -.- - . . . - • .•.-.-. . . :x,x.: - • .• . . , . -. .. . . „., - - • --- • . * . 1 16 28 •-:--,.-•- • _. „.. .,:.• - :::::::::; • . • • .• - • . . .• - 25. - •:.:: , . .. . . .• - -•;•:•:•;4 .• . . . - ••• _- .:-.-- _. • . _.. • ..,.... ,. , . :Ye!Y • , •:•:•••' . 7 . • I,- ... . - •, ••• • • ..•.• . ' - '.- . -. . " . - • ••••••,....._ ....-----.—..- .—........... •r•-• ...... ..., ml' Gray SILT,' non-plastic, dense, wet,:c :I: “ _ 1 layer clayey SILT @ 28 5' - .. -.-'. -. 30 . .-.-, . .Y.:•.'...T. - 1 ._.-..- . .. . ... r --..:::17- , ..,T.: • 12 . -,:-'• 23 '-.1.•:-.::: _t-•:. -- . . . . -:- - •:..v.:.x.....:•: : -. Grayish-black silty fine to medium-- --:- .:•••••:•:•:•:.:•:•: . . .•;. ::::.I.:::::::::::::;: . . • SAND, wet, medium densesin -. .: ', •-•:.. _ ...--, • . . ••-.. :•:•1•:•:•:•:•:•:•:- :_y_. .. , • • • • - - 17 _ 24 • - :- . . • :.::-.•. :::::-:.::::t.::::::. . . , With shell fragments below 37.5' -.. ,.. . • • - •::::::::::::::::::: . .• 40 :, •:.--- -- - " - - . . . . :::::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:- •• ••s • .,.. . • . . . . . T 21 21 .-f.i.-': :- • •.•:•:•:.:•:.:.:•:•: - - . .. .• . . . - ' • -.:!-:•!....4....:.,...... . • . . - • • .: ..-.. Boring terminated at 44 feet below existing grade. Groundwater • -.. . encountered at 17 feet during drilling. Boring backfilled with • 7ik . cuttings. 11 ' - ; ' ' •- --;. - . . _ . ' -: . . . • , • ... . . ' ' • ' - . . • • - • • • - • . . . . . • . • . . . _ • . • • . • . . • • Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location Cl INS exploratory hole.modified by engineering tests.analysis.and ludgement They are Viol nocessonly reprosentanni 01 Othei times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for Me use or interpretation by Others 01 information presereed on the log . . _ay. • .-er. - • • -.• • • • . • - :' BORING LOG . • . .• . . 1,. - z„ .., . ' .• • • i 14 /111)% .- .',:L --- -- ' . - P.ROPOSED WAREHOUSE - - -------r`t•--__ --,- RENTON, WASHINGTON Earth .•: ' i • Consultants Inc. - '- '. . GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING &GEOLOGY • Proj. No. 3453 I Date • July'87 'Plate 5 . . . . • -. . • •- . . • • • . • • . • .• • . . ,. •• • • BORING NO. , C. . • • ..._ ... . • . Logged By STL .• : • • • .. .• . • • - . .., ... . • • ELEV. -VI • • . ;,.., Date 7'8'87 • . • .• . . • - • US Depth (N) W ' • Graph cs . . Soil Description (ft.) Sample Blows . . ' . , . . . SW- Gray gravelly SAND with scattered . 10 35 ' sm cobbles,' moist, medium dense (fill) . • ,• .. - 5 11 15 ' . , . YJIII ol Brown organic clayey SILT, wet .. vi , t.. • :I: ' 2 . 67 qu=0.5tsf • •. . . . . . ' . - 10 PUSH 46 , Gray sandy and clayey.SILT, wet, ' - :I: . • •• . _ soft•‘• .:, • . .:t.• .. . • - 1 ' 2 • 46 ,-- ,. • -.,. .,.• . - • •-• ' • - - • . - . • . . . . ... . • - 15 . • - • .. ••• . . •. • . .• • . . . • - ' Si - ----- 51 • -'' - • • . -• ..... . . . L.I_ -•.:' 39 , -.'-•• ::' ' * ,:•C:'...,• •--' . . . . . • . • . • ..-;.-- ":4:':': •••• Gray-black silty fine SAND, wet, loose - 20 .. ._. ".•:•:•:, . -.. _ ... , •.,.. •--• -.. - . . • .'i, •••:•:.: ir....... sm- Medium dense" @ 22.5'--..'• ': • ••• • '..' •..• • . - '• . • • .,. . . ml _ .. . . '22 - 30 ' i•- ' • . . . . . . . 11::::::: . • . ,.,..- i•:::::: . . With .sandy SILT seams and wood fragments—. 25 " N..i: '. • . . . ..:- - el 27.5' ••• : :-•;-... - - ' ..- '. :- - .,.,_ • -1 .... .....,:,: ' , .. . . ., ... .... •., ,.,... . .. . . ::::,:i:. -. • • .,'• ',••'.-.'• •:•`••••.. .'...-'-' ....--:::';'••••• •, - ,-'''':•-. ' ',. -:._-:,' . I.... . .. , .. .7 ., .0 • , 1.1:::I. • 30 . . ,..,. • -' - • • - --- - - ' .; :. '. ;:i•-•;:i.:41:1:;:',: -. ..- -••• • .•-.. ..,- ,--,...-.. ---..r •--__• ..c•-••.: ., _. •. - :,:,..-:' • .. -. - --: -..- ... - ...---,•-•,:.•-i---• ... r •,-..:---:-.:_,..:.-„,•,. . , !:::::if4-1:4:: • -F.:- -•:.:•• - ---• . ----• ---%••• ••-..,- ., -'.-.-:---- • ." •.--'-'-- -'-. . ''..:----,i-:-.. •• .T. -:, • 3.8. .,.,- 22 - :...:::;::.-4i..,:;:r:•''2.... . . -;i . • i:i::::0:1+1- .-' Blac:k silty fine to medium SAND, wet, - .• •-.:-. : r :::::::::':1:;:;•••1: - mediumdense '.---.*:.• :.- ..',..-,-..-. ..:.• 7-, • : ... .-- 35 • - . •_ . , ..-::•• i:"......1:,:i:i::::::: -- • •:•:-.1:1:,:i:1:•:•: •• , . -- • :•-• - . .... • •••-•• • T . .-. ..,. . , . W,-,1-:•ve • With shell fragments below 37.51 . 14 23. : : • :.-.., _ ..,.,:ext.•:,....:. Sm .• . •.,- .,.. ..,.;..• . • !:;:::1:1:e:1*.i::: • •• • .. _ -, • • • •-- •. • .*.i:i:;:i:::::::: • • • .r .. .. . . _. - • -. :. • • . - . - -• ' -• . . . ixr.txtir.2::: -. :\:-.;::....• •,;, ' '. ,..--,,:•::-..-;.::;••-:",•:::,1,....'...--..:..;•-:- :j..- - ••:.• '.‘ :•i•-•_",'- • : .-, . •—1—•-•- . . . 22 29 :-• :••••••.:-.;-.''', '. • , . ditia..:..i..1:1:.;:. : •• , - .. _j_ _.• • Mr:C:IX • -- . . 0•:•t-•;•:•;•:• •• - . . - - - - - " - "- • ''- - , ,.,.1 ::t:t::::: .. . . • • - - . . • •. ..-• . - '::::Aii:•:.::::::::• , . . ..--- • - •• I 39 , 22 ••. . :: -..---•••. . ' • . . - . i • .:......,....,.....,.. '' '14....0.1. :•:.,-1.e.......:-.. .. • ' .,. .. . ......- • • • ._ - . . .' • — .. . • • . _ . .. - ,.. .:. ....I!, . --- - . • • • . ..... .. . . T . 11 24 • . • ' , . , • Boring terminated at 54 feet below existing grade. Groundwater • • • •. encountered at 17.5 feet during drilling. Boring backfilled with cuttings. . • . . , •. • . • • • •. • Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the lime and location of this exploratory hole.modified by engineering tests.analysis.and • judgement They are not necessarily representative Cl other tunes and locations We cannot accept responsibility for the use or imarpretstion by others ol information presented on this tog . . ,. . _... . ..-.. • • -- BORING LOG i'- i s .- :-•...,,._,:._. . • PROPOSED WAREHOUSE • Earth • . • ' . # (11,) • •• RENTON, WASHINGTON • • . Consultants Inc. „, - , • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING &GEOLOGY Proj. No. 3453 I Date July'87 I Plate 6 • •. • . . . BORING NO. - --- ,,L099ed By -STL - - gm Graph • Soil Description • Depth (N) e�►0 {ft.) Sample Blows rill Brown gravelly SAND Ft.dense, with scatteredmCobb� medium Gray fine to coarse SAND, led (fill �:trdense,s wet (fill) medium SZ 20 21 5 Brown SILT with scattered organic 4 28 matter, wet, soft I 2 PUSH 29 PI- 4 - :;. ::;::J:•'t• • = �—. — PUSH 29 . 15 -- • 6 25 :+;:: Gray silty fine SAND, 20 • • :: Medium densewet, loose � •" With below 22.5' 10 33 • ':::�; �: brown silty pockets @ 22.5' • 25 ra:'f sm. . i S 11 22 i:ri'• faith slit pockets @ 32.5'' 30 • 11 35 • • T 26 20 40 • 5 '-':.:' 26 Boring terminated at 44 feet below existin • • encountered at 4.5 feet duringg�rgrade. Groundwater. . " " to 42.5 feet. Lower 10 feet slotted. 1 PVC standpipe installed -_ Boring backfilled with cuttings. - Water level on 7-9-87 was 5.5. • r:= • • • .Subsurface conditions decoctedrepresent Din axerwtanc at the time and toceuon of this exploratory hole modified engineering tests analysis.IncFdDement They are not necessarily�areeernad.e a other t and locations canna accept naponarbdny tor the erpmlatwn by others of atbrmatron presented on this by • • • • - - -• --- fit, A- . _ • ~=- - =-�ti.• - BORING LOG Earth • - 47 PROPOSED WAREHOUSE Consultants Inc RENTON, WASHINGTON • G�EOTECHNICAL ENGINEERINGr B GEOLOGY . • Proj:No. 3453 Date July'87 f ,• BORING NO. . • Logged By STL • - - _ _ _ _ ELEV. �± • Date 7-8-87 _ al 0 _ _ • Graph CS • Soil Description Depth ft lh Sample Blows • Ft. SW- Brown gravelly SAND with scattered • sri cobbles, moist, dense (fill) = 53 8 , . Gray @ 6.5' - 5 • 30 10 6 ml- Gray and brown SILT and silty = 1 35 ' .:•; :: SAND with - 10 = • 1 43 • sm coarse sand and gravl._pckets and i;j: scattered organic maf .e iaet --soft IC PUSH - 20 ' sm Black silty fine SAND, wet medium dense , - 13 32 : With silt pockets and scattered • :�:i': 'c c organic matter at 22.5' . - i- 25 - ' .,.l'. ' :�:i: :.L 8 25 :e.,.;: •. 30 - .. . •" 1 22 :•;;:;::�.;. Gray silty clayey fine to coarse SAND ` f,— 35 _ 'i� :-.N., sin with scattered gravel, wet, very loose 1 25 18 — 40 - : ::::d: Black fine .SAND with shell fragments, . • - ..: :.: ::'i:: wet, -medium dense " . . . • . • `I 29. •.22 Boring terminated at -44 feet 'below existing grade. Groundwater • encountered at 17.5 feet during drilling. Boring backfilled with ' • - • . cuttings. • Subsurface condrtrons depicted represent our observations h the time and location at this exploratory hole modified by engineering tests analysis.and judgement They are not necessarily representatnre at other tones and locations We canna accept responsibility for the use or mbrpretatmon by others of Information presented on thins lop • - _ BORING LOG - - .. 11. -_ .;-:_.�3 _ --- - 1 - PROPOSED WAREHOUSE Earth RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultants Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING &GEOLOGY Prof.No. 3453 I Date July'87 1ate 8 SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PERINCH. U.S.STANDARD ' GRAIN SIZE IN MM• M 0 N ;�CM a ^° m .f O O N O e} �If tb O O O t0 PI N O CO r d O O 0 III A 100^ N_ N (�� ~ O^ co N O O O O O O. O O CC O C 0 - I ® .N. 96 2 i - `� 10 5 r+DI ` — m m go 80 20 i LA Cl 70 �_ 30 33 Z t. • c?I 60 - - J -� O r Z + 40 m m __. \ 0 4 '�y' I IW 50 i `- _� 5 oo . c49r IN NIV-•,•••.• • *LM-) 401. , • , xo � '1 ' . -( I: •A. 130 - •r� . m It. 20 A so _ .4 V Q l w 10 _ 4 �—90 w ob r _ u, 1.1 M 14 0 0 - I I r ► I l I I I r_I I I 18 I I I► I I IT I I IT L► �p p ' 1O0 z itip 31 0 O O coO o v M N O CO 0 a I' N CO ID a M N r O g a O O O 8 O O O O 0 z to > " N — GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS o o O O O O .N•► - Ch n z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE CD Z 0 y COBBLES FINES N - O GRAVEL SAND fn m 1.4 1-8 z 2 M KEY Boring or DEPTH Moisture p USCS DESCRIPTION Content (961 LL PL 03 GIn Test Pit No. (ft.) rn 0- B-A ' 2.5 SW-SM •Well grac 'SAND' with silt and gravel 7 • E • W Q--- B—E 2.5 SW-SM Well graded riAND'with silt and gravel 8 r • -r I • ,�i t 3 f • • • C 41) 4 a. to • w 2 - • • • • • • W . >is 474\40A PRESStsf - Boring Depth - -- Liquid Plastic Plasticity Moisture Dry Key No. (ft.) USCS Soil Description Limit Limit Index Content, W% Density % % Before After (pcf) • A 12 ,ML SILT 46 38 8 54 44 67.3 _ � CONSOLIDATION TEST DATA . - �.- • • 1 - - PROPOSED WAREHOUSE . — — - z Earth I,i •• RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultants'Inc. 1` GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No.3453 I Date July'87 Iiate 10 \ \-. • , 4. • ' . ....7.,.. . • ‘1. ••.-. — .. . . . • . • . . *.. • C C' E...) . . . 0 0. • . 6 4)............., _ . co co cu - cc •• .. . . . I . "••• .--:. • .. - , - - , . - , ... • - . . . , . ._ , I : • k k I k 1 k .-. '.c., • • : • .. • - : • . • - ' -- 7..-'7' ..::-.' - . • , - . ..'.:...,... 1 . • - :. :: , _'.. .. . • —.. . '' • : = ... ..., . • . , ': • 0,..:*1 • - ' ,.: • ' ' • , 7::•-:.- :. :.• 4 - ••• .. . '-- % -2::, :: ,:. :.: • , :,••:::-:. .j ••-: ',`:: 1:;:'...:: : k . :.?••'.....1:.... : ----:' • .- . • -.:';‘.. •.• ::•'-' • • ,.. ..- . - .., PRESSURE, tsf . - .. Boring Depth -._,-- . .,. Etquid Plastic Plasticity Moisture Dry Key No. (fi) USCS Soil Description Limit Limit Index Content, W% Density % % % Before After (POI - 0 D 10 ML SILT 34 30 4 47 37 71.9 • • . • • " ,. R. CONSOLIDATION TEST DATA • :i. ;) , , ‘ , .. .-',. - PROPOSED WAREHOUSE A Earth :, , i RENTON, WASHINGTON • ... Consultants Inc. . .GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY , Proj. No. 3453 I Date July'87 I Plate 11 wim..... + • _ _ SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE - M -• - NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING • • • • • • 1 • _ - • t4 OT - _ -,'-•' -- _-_ _ y. • Base Consists of arn-Inch thick, 2 foot by 2 fool plywood with __ • center drilled sie-inch diameter hole. •,' -' ' - ,• : :Bedding material, if required,should consist of Traction Sand. - - '__ • Marker rod is siz-inch diameter steel rod threaded at both ands. t°L _ ' ! .•parker rod is attached to base bynut and washer on each side .an. . of base. • Protective sleeve surrounding marker rod should consist of 2-inch - - . diameter plastic tubing. Sleeve Is not attached to rod or base. • Additional sections 01 steel rod can be connected with threaded couplings. ` . . • Additional sections of plastic sleeve can be connected with press-tit plastic couplings. • . • Steel marker rod should extend ■t least S-Inches above top of plastic sleeve. . • • Marker should extend at least two feet above top of fill surface. • •,l•. Typical Detail of Settlement Marker Earth + proposed Warehouse Addition Consultants Inc.\ , Ti Renton, • woshington -;•. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING I GEOLOGY Proj.No. "3453 Date Aug. 687 .1 Plate 12 f 4. ,(. • s • IMPERVIOUS SOIL - • •0..•4.�� i:L•:%:,r.••�•�+�.�,f• •r rW '••I.Zi��I_!•t.ti ..4'~:' I I� L • 3.: •.`:i i':.i. • - stir--e,..i•.:-•:. .**1'.. EXCAVATED SLOPE 18" MINIMUM FREE .•• DRAINING GRAVEL • MAXIMUM SLOPE o���1E.ti •d :� y: • : '` fr . DEPENDS ON SOIL • • Q.•®.: V CONDITIONS. IN NO • • - =+' CASE SHOULD IT BE STEEPER THAN 0.5:1(H toV) . •.•••, - ii - 7 ' '?'• -UNCLASSIFIED BACKFILL -ter :_ ......6. •90% RELATIVE COMPACTION - III •:fit , 1 ft.MIN. • J_ .'••_' • ;-:• . � :`• PERFORATED PIPE ='r• ": / L.' -• —' 1'°MINUS ROCK OR PEA ° ' . 1ft. MIN. ; COMPACTED SUBGRADE GRAVEL. WRAP + • ,MOCK WITH FILTER-FABRIC - _ - • _ • _ Retaininglall Draa a an: , ..,.:a, .. ..„.. ...: ._:.._ , : ..i.:„ :.'•;,.-',' ::'• . , . .. Backfill• NOT-TO-SCALE ; • -•.NOTES-... . a _...Classified backfill should consist of granular soil having no more than 5 percent passing the 200 sieve and no particles ,greater than 4" in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the 4 sieve should be between 25 and 75 percent. ....Unclassified backfill should be free of organics, clayey soils,debris, and other delete- rious materials. It should be placed at or below the optimum moisture content. ....For free-standing walls, weep holes may be used. Surround weep holes with 18" of 1"minus rock. . RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE AND BACKFILL PROPOSED WAREHOUSE Earth - iii)i -RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultants Inc. • ' GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Prof. No. 3453 'Date July'87 'Plate 13 - % ' '4,41:-.'' -...;'°."." -:.*'•• - . t6101e!,-. ' '°•,,::.,.---••‘....••:7---:-.T.- 1.) _:.: ::4:..- '; l'...-•:‘• •) .0.- W:":... - - .r-.'-...'„,lr-1 I1 ..'. \ (....„\.._,1 •,% • il:; "•Liu'&111.4,_„.--.••••V-. '. i 7 1 1 .'. ' --- _ • ..- 2!!_,,-. - : 11„..,.--.:., '.',:'`c . -•;;. .•. 5. .:_Ck, 6..,.--C ). :7111 ' .... 41111o' 4-j'' --.-''-''''." ---.:511 r(i 1 ''. 111% 11'"$1"_.1-W_-,,,..-1:-r-..,--.:..-..,..,...•...-. -,,--;_.-__-_--„--.--„ • �y:. -,;._iAdio:I?VNW_.,-.....•....,o„,en,nrW_.'1: ZO 0 -1 ca TT_ i ' ,_,.t,,,.....;-1- 1.........:t.......•• -.'. C3-/..„. .‘:: y _ __-..-.,_ ,. if 4<.• .' •••.- -- __-- •,, _ - .----...-#,..• '-••"•4 • - .:•:•---- - "--,40 'AN . . -0 •----- ---.---7.7-: •••• — .... • ; -• - (--- ••-. ...j 1.---„_ I rilt --- , NM F. 1 v ).,~ - re rya 7�/ J ? _ !�1' 4 +� • _ �k` ' i -44. ` i,•' �.�,a� c ��. 'tea` I a'^` t ' ' C ^it%/ -! + 4 � • 1 C. i -NJ / ? ,. _ - q.„, 1. . `� [: ,. .. ..,.., , , ,., ,,:,., . . .,),..,_,,... \,, ajo ,,:,.. . ,.,,,c,. % - 1..., •••.__- 11/4:_t_i.,), •,,,•:-/-777 , k ,. ____..., _, • i ._ , ,- , ,..,..: , .., - , .,_.: \, \\ -, , _ , ,• , ..„, , , , ,...,. , \ l , . _ . ._ 1, . - p d,`. !.�- - a� ^ �' �- 's a i ii ,1 •G a -...-....-/ram 't\ 1',' ° r \*. •� _____ _ .....:.„:„ ,:7; „f _, , in. .. , kk, :1-4,, , _ -. _-., -, 1 1 '... ' ' 1. 0 . I I r , k,./! , IN: , 4.', Lrc...> 4...) 1 "'" .1 . " \) 4. I, (,, . I! , . - L.,. ."-1 .4' •- •• ... , ,. , --' c----f'---„-(,-- - 7.:., ik i.r.'"----.-. . , _ • • rj f ; • �J� � \ IvI� If • .a / 7. • I i ?t I :. .\' ,\ I_I - ç d Ill 1 •,,....." 4.../-, N4k•*', :, ••: i ; e.,.. f.. :- I u I ,41,„ . __ . • ,, ,,,,______„,. _, ___.„. - , . ..._ _____. ,.... ___ . * rt '1B7 ..., ...:. , _ \ '' _--J */- :---:• tIvEt %ma C/ !./. ..,..-- ---"4-,:-----,-----,---__.7 _ .. „N.:: .____ ___,, ,,-- --1.),_. t,, . \ ,,, rCiir I !-, - ' ,•-J. ,�,`-'1 �r���. -•— ' - WORK MAP FOR SHEET 21 of Q I a a -� No. 33 I i •.r i — W • =, • _ _ ,,^ _ FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP & o K� `—`` CONTRACT NO. .' ��s- `�-`,,'' -', �__ . FLOOD 4 _ _ , BOUNDARY AND FLOODWAY MAP EMw_$s-C-iss3 f(�� 11 `r ti ! ' i ,�z' _ " . _ _ COMMUNITY: %� SOURCE OF FLOODING: W �' �� "` '� :-�_' - � -- KING COUNTY, WA GREEN RIV EE SHEET 1 F o , BLACK RIVER, SPRINGBROOK CREEK - ' .. 1.-*'''''':-'-•- .- .;..--.- ' ' zoA7e. Agt--'' '•''' _, _ • , -.....-- ---4._.......,_, ; • 4 -• Q, ._ '''' ' - • •• / .r,,,,,,,F.1 .. ....., J\ •._.----/- ' '.,. :-.... a---- ., gii. ., ,..-., ,, ). . ., •• il 0 (., ' .'. ,, ' __ , . . • _ .. . •,,•.. %.,. i 2oisi xr,l' -,, k-- -'1.,i ,:, ,, i,,,, ) , t:. 4„, • . __________..../.. p. ,. [ oivE ••••, ';• - , -, i''.‘ ; k ,..„ -, "Y.'1! ' ., * • . . . Clip,:' ds„ i";1;' ' •.,-., 1.,,..-;',-. --,...., \ ".1f I/-\et.---./,‘ ...7.. -, *r• 1%. I.4, °•:!•V,10 ''.-' . . ) '... J471,4%.'i••• .. e.4.1:- ...; :, 7 ''4, i\ • ..'..- -.-• 0 •ge A \ . • ,-, , , .: % ,--_ • - ° it z 0,, -.-. . ' ..,..-,f: . ." 1 :: 'I ., ... n 0 o`sr , :.•• \ .S, ,,‘r "'(' -4 0 C, - •'.. \ .--, ,. .. 1 \ ' .,.‘ -,.\ . v \ /40P 3; 3k ..,.% - ' (I: Zi .12C 4.a 1.... ''' ..--- \ .r_...?"—;,---4, - i '• : • r •• f ..\,•,. . - ... „____/..„S •1 i \:.\ ' • e.) ' k_ • '1 ' 1`• ..t'‘...,-----.-4' , . 41 -.1.,...,, , -4. 4.-• / . ' . ---••• .• 1 J 1 (0-Cll..,c••• • r. ,e'- ."' --& .. -.'-'--7:-..1=-1.-- ---'*-----' - - _-_-_:i.-1..- -% ., .-- --.:7.E .' - ------ :' -• i . : ''• i• 1 ,-• •-•.. . • t: /-,/',,1,/ i4 - ------z.- ,-- 1 ZaVetEL ' '''-,-;"f ._ • 414 -' '11 ''' - • . , 1 ." •• ;..1, , .., •- 11 2 -• . 4. ..i . ' , •.., . El . - _ . . • .zan/ff AE. Vi' -..... • , - k II , . .., .,.. ) lc;,..... - „Qt.) ce,-,.;:._ , I . _ • - - ' , .\. ..... Alik 11 . • )1 V..),./- \) t.:, ). (.‘ ;,.. . ...7 -,_..,.. ........ .. ......"-- •••.-- ,-.............,,....... ,... ..,4,..II ilip : . 100 .., • ' k __.%), ...... • ...,,,,, ,,.... . zoN, x ,...,..,. .-...„...------- -----___,, N..„----,„,„,,,,, ....‘ •. , ,,‘ .,,t, . ..........„..... ';#$# .....: 41. . .. lir . \ e _ _N 4P4lit• AA r‘'.. . . 0 --- ........ ... .„ :4.,.-- -) •-.,.. .,. ., , \,. .• . . .. ..„..1 .. r 1 , -... , '\•-•It) \" s s \ - A).1' 1 , , -- •>,..' \\‘ , '( ,-, ''' ;„,..., V(' _ .,1 1 \. ; .,-,... ..-L--4---.:11 - -- ••111f ''• • )'. :. ••• 4 I.;. '‘.''s\ ''\I\ , \ ''.7\ ' Il N CI ';.• \‘ - It \ \ 4- • 0 "A) ':.-. .•,.. - --..• I ki r -... . 111, I •., -,, -..... 4... .„,, •, , ', • '''*, , . .. • ,-..•1, ( 4 -,..3' -) •-•• \t. ,... \' .. \\7-... q •-.,. ',/.. si ) ;- . - \\? ' cA I ''' 1 4 \ '''` '".. .• ' / -4 t '.i, '; J",., . v. ZOWE A - , - i -,- . -, .. --,, . r 1 ...., . . . ...... j , ., ::•• ,.. , , ) ., .... ,. ,. , ,. ..• ,...,..,,,.... _.,_. . ,.. ..,..... ,,, , , ..... ., . _ ,, f_,• ,, ....... .... . , \. ,,, ,,, i. :•, ... ,,,, 1-• \ - , ..., ✓ .. l:•!, ...--- .. r? ', \ \ % ; __,,'7,...> II , I"'. :10 r•Vii......,„-- - .'•P / •. 'rt. -II . -------:' <-- I •'s l" I 1 -. __ • -•- . s' ' ., • .,, . .... .„ -..; , . i .•• . , .e •0\• t-x•k I ' e n . ..• .S." \ ' .•-• ' 1'I '''. s'r4 ' "Ili 41 • . .• -' ▪ ( 2 '--- ,•,, . . . . •4,•• •• 111, , .. /^ • .- s.- \ , • I." - . 4 4•• \• --4. "P \ (e,;., ' V% c• , 1:- ..f . .., . ,\:' 0 , 1;,‘,. I l = -. - • . .1, • ' II •, i N. .i ..---- -- ------ ------ • , \ . I''''.' ' ...4: \ .c, (44`‘ .4..., ,:'' ,.,-...e. 1‘..,._% 2,- , :„. ., ,. .... -------•'• ,_--7:_--- , .... . f• al. • ; ,. i•-:` ...": ...,,1!..1.) , :-*.• ._.„„4., t r‘ ' ---- ‘ .- ,•., .-=---"'"---r- ? s.i. r_:..:,_.--'-% _ . ( ___- .! t\ \.'• ... `"'N e \' ""-'s ' . . -- -• 11111/4 \ ,,_.t•- 4 .-„, * , - • ' . *: . .1 . :I. ' 4.--'''.. 'V 4 i - . . - •,. 1._____I+ .... -,,,. . . ,----- ..-- . — • . 4 - 4,-. 4 - ..41 --‘1,12 0 At..,,_};_:.„,_... yb•••.• , , IN \ , • :::'"-..--'-------T-•••••.... .. , k -•• , "7 •'*:--i-An, ". ., _ : ' 4. . 1 t• ) ..•••\ ' I: a• ' - 'Li"-- :. ri..ct ...• ,- N. ---:-:-•- ---_. - ..... . ' ,.-',.,--•*Ilki'e I , .,,,,.,•ow— -11401V-41:-__:, ----%- ' , 1 l''' [_)• t 1 d• ‘'n i,t. •I -1‘',-t--e•:\N. ->- -----.-___ , . --.4-77_,_-- .,..:- 4//,,amor--,..- ,„;„, ,„.. di ,,,a 1 ..... ........- '''' ZO X - . ,...., s,...0 ••••• ,„ ••• •„,,me- „..--...- .., ,-,, C.3 • .;:. \N'l \ \ • - ---- 4 ..: • ., \, -J.-, ., , -A f ci V c? , . : ,,‘, • .... • • . . .) •-,. .;\ ,' \„‘ .', , ,.. . • ....,- -. - . 1, ; — ,:: - -0 4,,,, ‘,. , • ) . _ ..„_. ._ . • .. • . •_.,--..-.. , / • , -s-.-, ,--- 0 44111,1 „ ,, .1 i., -, . ./,‘„, :_/-- i c„. ...,„ ,, ......• _ 4 _ ,,, . a- - • '• __=_ - - N , S I • . t ,,., ' ------ . ....., v..%),.. I it,..,*. ,.!:, , • i . 4• 4"..'T 144.4.444444'44.44"4"-'''"""'".""'""•111.1111.11.11111.11121" ..• , -L.'... . - 'IIII --•;?'- ''.'%M. - 11111414. 'A ) ‘., • _ -," ....- •4'' ' 43.0-6.1.2°‘ - ' R -• -' "'"UiF---. • -'7-77------__---•'-':''-- 'A / , r• . V: ' - N\J'. 6 .., -7)---.4)_\_.,......e.010" ... •-__1_.----.------ . ,_ co 1 ... .,,.. ! ' / . .'''f, 4",, 2. I ' ..N, \.--.--..---4-?,.,___ '1. .• -. ' •__ _ ______ _!1‘..ji ,".'„_-..2„,, --TO tr-,9 rni".7fi.:A/- -,..' •._ .r_----,, .,..L:.•- _ . r Fij - .,, , ,,; _. , ,,,10:1F4616... ,e-iii. „..... . , ,--.- - , .... . , ,, „ • • -111 /-.-' , ,„, •, ----- ,..--- -01 ... • 11. V ' . Z' rAtj E .1 • ' 1 if' - 1,5„.„./ -- .40, . e''' f , ., •. • Aft ', .--...., ej ,. . i , , •,..dh ,. l '- , . '-'4.4 --I VA/ • ... ..- •:..\ • i'....T- / ' 4 ... . .1 . .. .... ,t1 4 . 4.4yk .......14.......- •...•. Aw 211i ei------...( jig.. -.;- -------‘ •) ---",\I-j 1- 7.-- " P.\''\\;*•\'\\‘:k. ,.. litifl\A" , -3 i• 0.0„.....-__,4491, e.,..••,:::, le, - '-.\•:•Risl'g.. tilt - Irri, - _ •_ •:. 1.g$V -- . ----- -z-- — 1- 2-. MI • -7-1 - .t ,•17 - . ..../ .......__/ - . c, • ,'\\C ''.' ''' /- •'. 4._- - -0 ,..- " 1. •f-- )„ - ---. ...1-- -1,f '."--- ...3 'e:11Prinp. 6 1 . .-, •-•"' 0,- • *‘% . ' • '.., • t (::=1 tc • '‘all‘(1 41." \, .1:0 .4A.:' ':41: " , 2 . •1 '' `7.--' Awl, el:- '''s.-- 2, \ 'i ‘s / .-tt,\ ‘',, ,,...„ ., 1„ , r1 ., . ..---- --...i...- tt-i. , 0,...._ ,4, , • ,... (......--- )ir i '‘‘,, 4 0 ' s.. s , ,, ,--,.."7-:';-------"---"'"".---'- •Nis:4\i\.. r1;11Z irl'"`'"'''.) - IP I.\. \\ o°c ,. 'r—,'1.._I :i; —, --...." 4:::____, -,.. _1 ;,.4 t •,: '' -\ A ':' •0 ' 1 1 A %' ) ),,..-_---,--- ' \\\ 9,p 0 0 •I q ‘ \v. ...cS / ...•-•44 .-____ 17-,-. ..,..„,_,-,.. ..••••.•4......._ I -..••••••-•-•- ..4. .. . •• ti s, / ;C // ') 11 1 . f• ,, I •1 ''t 1 ,j l'• -, fho 1 0, 0 1 01 '''. '‘ 16 ' .14. 0 % • , ,:: t\ ,.., -- . . il ,... .; ,• ...., ,:c•- '1 . , '\\ \ 0 IC—-1,1't::Q*11 jou,' 4 . -7.---;-- .•'t\S. ( • • I (--- • 4 4 1 1.• \- 4:. 1,. ;111I '''''.•• Illel, 1 /......./•-•sr'., t4/I,..• 4I 1 .. ' '•,..:.'.., ..,./..;. Ie. -,:...:i; ... 't-Nt. • 1 i Ss 1, .. -- \G-- . ‘ 1 •••• I ) I I • : It. i I 7 1 it• i 1, 0 ‘ . i ' • e,r,fr: r• 1 .0...... ,, , . , . t.., • I I, UM- 1 411 ) •ti / 1,.. '• 1 I i 1. — . .4. •'''.•4 Ali Ir ' 11 1111(.47-1-ii.'Ili nia. 11 I ....t . • • r r.- -. \ '"-,.• ' ••-. 1.. • 'a. ' e•-. 4. 101 /eQ4Z21. 1,-4 6 0 4 *-, r•-•.:- 14 I.,\-.i ' ''Ir -', g••-r .., • -,a, / ...-/ • V IT i 40:i--i- • i - 1 • I a I -... / ---.----- 4' -- /... .., , i...I>, a ,II .. --,.. • f. k}11 4 ( .1'4 111 t Il raT-- k - ..--••• : I , ' • •••%. i \ 1 ".,• , I if; 1 . • ' x -1' ..42 i Imp ,11 1 1 ;.-: • . i• . 1 ••• - . ....f..• :7'1 i abI,1 _. •_____ ,. 4 \_, _ z) , 04•161P . •., 1)\" , / am= 1. • ..„ '-"--- ' e - \) .1 • C111(1 . • -,..4 • .• " ' , ,•• r,1 \i..e.,4,--. 0.....4;::.._ . , 4 I r. : t 1%.* II' '1. - -' I --19' • ? °'44- •14 a I, __11 1 • /, . .„..;,___,.._.....:. 1 ' ‘44 's• 'I I \'• -• •-•.1 ' • .4" '-----s /-• • I / '' 4 'qi 1 a • P:,I Pl‘f•/:_) isi 4 ' I I 4 4, ,.., . : _ _ ,i. ,, •,1:0 1.\ / / 14 I . I 1 I l' at•'. A ‘r / rr%4".jP;IF:j‘' '. I . it ''.•/, ,i. 1 , I Ili / I f• 1... ... . 2. \----:s•J ,.....- ris, .. , , . , , ,i,, — .... ___ , ,, :—..,, , .. ,.. ........ ,. I 1 \ '1 •„ 4 1.1 / -4(' -1 i /..) • X 1 1 i 11 tf i. ti, ' A I 1 D ' 1 c...1.4 ... ;.•• A ..-- , r ,- 4 ) ...4.1 6. r ( , p )0.. . rz... ,/.' ..„. . , ,s‘ , 4 ., 1 .77.,,.S,,.. 4,- 1. • '., ' •I ' ; ii 1. o',' , • .-.. I I 1 . . 1 ,•-, . ' 1 , , „:.) ligil..y) , ,.. ._ ..,... ; .4 .". ., i . .... s -(t4..f ....--, •. . , . 1 . $ 1 i) r\ . ii 11 N„ . 2.„.„,, . ,, —1 d \N..,„ \.. I • '' ,..... u 4.,).‘ g"k i, . 4.1..........,-, -. ., • • .1 '---- If' ' 4h ,I' , 1: • , •ifili I • i ( ):•• ll ) .11 ,• . 11 1 I I'1 M • o es 0, .7511 \ ...i. ,,, , , 1 i ... All.. el...i. I I I l 1 : * i I it., ' . Ina - V ii01 4L,\.. :,... - ',\....,;,c.,,,--j,' . , ,i'•t . i •%. • .. ts- 1 . {„ ,..• • '. %. ' li. L \ ., \-- .1 • • L----•••• ' t....•!..)•• , .. • •‘`' ^ ' I ' ••••......, , , ...` ' I • . '"- N \ :• .'-.. .. i . ,1 1 \il ' -.... ..,j ,7- H: iiv., Li ,1\ 1, _./. .„ p ".....,. 1, I I '.. \ •! \ &t. / till , •_..",\ '' - *. ' '----- . ..... ,,, ., = I elp , I. ' • • ?% .1, . ,..5 ....• evl i I•_•=7,E7.- 2v i r '' \,, ... •• ...,.„„ ei, 1 N iri:‘ -„s .*_____---"",, • 7 ' ' ...) ...... :, __ , 3. _, • c,°' . _ --_-_•__-____:". •,'il, ' ' li lit ' / bil 1. . • „_ t- / • , 1 !1,..,.. ---- i---- i ti• . ,..„... ,$1,i 4:t ----c. • , 1 1 Tr , . : J- P. \ •‘1.• N.,. ------ / I I • '''",..79e) 1 p---,,e,---,-..„___..„..,1, -- .,..„.Th4:\ .„,... ... t t I, f".II . y 1 - 1 ____,...-- ____,__, • . _. -:. ,N. , :. E) .. I l'/ 1 V2 \' • - • ' , • C-I 1-1 i e l _ 1 ' , . ,. EE SHEET 1 P , ,., I .ill plannncltlr, rearures oursruc spcu. . .,....., w It I or adjoining Wrap panels, see separately printed Index to Map — i Panels. i 0- F ---r INITIAL II)I N I II ICA I ION: 4• JUNE 7,1974 I LOOT)IIA/ART) BOUNDARY MAP RI VISIONS: v NOVEMBER 7, 1975 i~Q if; d. II.00D INSU RANCI. RAIL MAP III l r I I\ I , MAY 5, 1981 11.00L) INS(IRANCL RAIL MAP RI.VIStONS: A r ... to determine it flood insurance is available in this community. contact your insurance agent,or call the National flood Insuranu Program,at (800) 638-6620. 1 APPROXIMATE SCALE 500 0 500 FEET I--) f-1 1=1 __ I O J 0 tl. I CATION 1101 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM of power telephone pole hwest 16th Street bridge side of road. Established , ent. j power pole on north side FIRM 'vole east of Springbrook FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP uhlic Works Department. _on east side.of driveway ird Street, 51.5 heel south 1 eel south 01 south lace of 1 I:•ublic Works Department. ><. ;as+r-� :.,., •a 'leira: ,r,.w... 11 y4 � **1; •45 '•'._ CITY OF ' ; tt ' . RENTON, 1 98a isio it. . WASHINGTON M it KING COUNTY PANEL 4 *OF 5 1 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) r Rent* cagy r- 1, COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 530088 0004 B MAP REVISED: • rF 5173, 1. • �,y .ph� F�' 1 ' Federal Emergency Management Agency 1.� 1 REV.PRELIMINARY I I 90 DAY STARTS I I PRELIMINARY I 2 \ g II- j \ 'R9. ZONE AHr y �z : _y ''" LONGACRES : RACE TRACK _ __ ZONE Cu) w ,, J z�. �.' ZONE N E C SOUTHWEST 19TIi STREET ,s . ni J t• 3'k, M QI s FM.: ,, lij f C t -ZONE AHf-1 _ O 0i I �dra ' .. .s (EL 151 + I I ZONE AHo D !, j o 14.. . (EL 15) 5.ZONE C i ZONE C �� I ( �+e. e ZONE.. C ' i wi ZONE C ZONE C t , ii " q i AH o- �� _i ,r , Aei r z " 4 ZONE JA4 ;\\ -i ZONE AH II ) ---- 1 IEL151 _ / ----SOUTHWEST ' P Z 5 .1 l 1 Bridge Under p, ,`` . ZONE c I1�(-Construcrivn cc a �� 1!f ZONE �, I a 1 y ° I g ~ ZONE AH - z Ii 151 , _ cii ZONE C S001WEsT Zrty ST ET . I RM 10 p1 ____________}: _. -'�- —�. -,_cn ~�� ?_-+*'R+.+!"+wia�w .'Aiih ... � '�4 ' � __.___. _ • ZIP If- t ' ¢� sl 1 ' ,�' a " I ,4 s; S W _.2 l 111 S 1 R� I j ii. f [01—zors1 (EL L —ZONE C'' '' . . .,ZONE C __ { =�_._..___i.,-,._..• SDUTtgME$L — ! ITH STREET Ili. ZONE B 1, SOUTHWEST 31ST STREET • f,. ZONE A4� tip i - f t 1. ZONE B /�r� PZ �OJtG �r5 16 ZONE AH f ''✓.rc" 3 ( G4d,N' . !aa e«. J (EL 161 41�c91 Z. 4�/4`C T�fUJ`�lr.1 i[G�v.SI!► lS j�r, f � ) i , . ZONE C _ 1 LI : :11 jOP0 �- P� ° Zes- $QUTHWE$T ..--_3SSH SII EE-I__ ZONE C — ✓� ZONE AH I ZONE B (EL 16) r- '-- HAYMOW) m} i I ! -_—' _{__ Abandoned Railroad 1 —+--- _, 1 , __ 5 --OZONE C >> OUTHWEST 41SL_ STREET-- --- -- ----- �- — ZONE A4 ZONE B + M �r all planimetric features outside special flood hazard areas. For adjoining map panels, see separately printed Index To Map Panels. r _ i INITIAL IDENTIFICATION: JUNE 7,1974 FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP REVISIONS: NOVEMBER 7, 1975 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP EFFECTIVE: MAY 5, 1981 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP REVISIONS: • Refer to the FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP EFFECTIVE date shown on this map to determine when actuarial rates apply to structures in the zones where elevations or depths have been estab- lished. To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your insurance agent,or call the National Flood Insurance Program,at(800)638-6620,or(800)424-8872. APPROXIMATE SCALE 500 0 600 FEET 1—I I /1111 limummemanollo rloN NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM power telephone pole II :st 16th Street bridge le of road. Established ✓er pole on north side FIRM east of Springbrook c Works Department. east side of driveway FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP street, 51.5 feet south south of south face of c Works Department. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON KING COUNTY Fil 04:04A-- PANEL 4 OF 5 111 IP I (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PF tP4t D) Tom—. COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 530088 0004 B EFFECTIVE DATE: MAY 5, 1981 federal emergency management agency federal insurance administration ' ZONE A4 �, y ` g TN N 1 ZONE C 3 � �,/' E R ZONE �4 a� N cs, �'` f / BURUNGT O-1 �' pY F- 10 W ,n \\\\ S,• T W ZONE C �. /so���� _ �x / i 2 ~ F v) 3 D o co W w )pors ' 6*. .1 Tr.,, ,‘ S • W W > / f- > Q 4 —OAKSDALE AVENUE p Q _- SOUTHWEST N - - - --- --- - - •_--- --=-- - _ O W W Z U O J '_ __ _ Z Z z Q 0 y Q � —_ —'-- .'`aOUTHWEST 16TH STREET W t Z to16 \ 16 0 O , ,_ } I ( Ai } F / ZONE C tu i b `F++ ! /( ^'\� � i s r .vo,...... rr / I�' , ' ��.......,ti�\ •� ZC _ONE AH r (EL 16) I 1 ZONE A4 ` J .' - ZONE C ��---,__ ZONE C lri H #�� :;LONGAARES �'C)P�E cc RAC& WRACKOO C) 4 )/; ' 1 191.::1,nti,.. ,f?h.�55d+i,,k e - /. il 9:i ( / Jii?0,40,1.,:. . $ v \ r e t s d t _ TUNE C " " r' i / ou. r Y+ , Fw i. J _I ,I ZONE AH (EL 16) i I 2 et Ar,,i • , 4E,Ldif U,7WN k. Q. a° ZONE C ,, •'* ZONI O z ci 2 J CC CO SOUTHWEST 27TH STREE _ t — ZONE Apt , t . 0 W W 29TH STREET 1 715I.' 4i i -1/1! { I ..\...tuetaem... .... ,,, , ,, . .„.**Ititii I SW .t„NI STREET } S_W to —SSTREET f f } } , { i 1 1 - f f OUTHWEST 34TH [ STRE ._� I I I • I I q 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 11 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 I1 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I -....i,:1),Hil '1 i I I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I'�:1;;.'7"»a .... -_ .. ram.s.:, .,t` `�tom.. .�a ,a > o o IL Ed oi.i do'.> .o�..tom.- • 10.1 E I . .ono. ..N.! ii=.o do'..�f ooa. .m.o.. o a t�_>T �.. rtN ...s 2 1 .° u.in..,r(mr) ...a t'a•.idIV.) • t,.r;:`.u:�n i7-d.+mr...er+) 7 ; °d.°� -{ E' L E V A T I 06 N °1 r9 Q 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 t 1 4 4 4 4 4 Q ® I I •I . IIII o 0 Z a 3 W E S T ELE V A T I 0 N I)mtlir- a - • rnn • 4 4 4 Q OO o ,_�— ..... .. 0 ix II 11 1 I aw.... ..r.... N 0 R T N E L E V A T I 0 N 1' w w p o cr co I I 1 I I I I I I I I i I I I I 1 I -P- ale)wr .--•µ N .. Tr_E d 3 S 0 U - T H E L E V A T I 0 N to O co 1 ° ° O 41 id 0 4 ° .421, i 2BY m ?-�LLL m 0 E o ~ mN U� m J m0 W ehaa In I I 1 I I \\ A`i I i l I -l I I`• P " / 7 I i' lil l'' m �I A __,,_(_, IIe FFee R e F I 0 x V INDUSTRIAL PAR ( Fp — ENTON II �I ., .�. \ \ \\\. R w A 2 L I ;N G T OU N ; N mO R T H E R N m ii --- -- II :- ' m.te . = J3! NWt ' «. -- -- a ,.? . o RI AL PARK RENTON 2E i c I OO BI! RI lit El, r r. LINO AVE v ,. 3I{ltl` ,•y .�,� m - •Ru E P�_L_-A„T ;. a R i lji! I I 11 11111 O N s N 0 R T H E R N. 0 RI L L ( A s p 6!�I 11111 1 P A'R K 0"F R E'IN T O"N D 'I,V. I A i'pl li : m Ike w .... PII ,m M1_ I'I1!111 s 11 ill,i III II ' �I - - Ih m ;Ill Y—...-=ND -.-._...._..........r._ ..—.�req, —..____ ., - --�.�_._.EAST.-•. MALLEY. _"._AD._ Y�w`,-- 1 Y Ili 1 ./I -IHIr7- n.-r � r.b .. —lance mueller �a���a3ma ou��co���oa� — A , & associate >wa a..w. 1 2 architects aia S W 27th STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON ,,,ee,,., „ 130 Ieke.m.•...tn.wee.90103•3021323 2883- --1.31 .vommommgAr GENERAL NOTES to' rcrrX2:".I-Z,IZ:=III:=1/.ItrITtr:.trodrnnIVIII,;un,,,,,./......tu.. 1 i LI 1 r- .., 11 ....'..nr..."..."....... I? U. r-1 • e. S C. Mne...Zeiitgr=r=.r217111..t:rj...:T.t:t::: ....re.. (All current editions a.moo.e,Neel nutnorityl. """"""'"."d""tru*""lenrtemperature will be beim I= , 17.'reent=ron731'1:-T.drintt:74":%'.:f":frtneles't'o avoid 1 % _ Interference between divisions of Ne wort. ..— =I _ ...°Z.nsbn.c.r.b.”sZP..nd........z.z.N.Nr•........r.z• — -. Ar. _ 21.Concrete walks to Net Zne follow.criteria:, uL _ ., e — e ei , ZNN Nr'en..-.mln••3,Ns• I OZ_ 2.2 _ . A 23.1:7titivLfrtures NI be drawn on.once.but snail be provided es -4 MN 'a 0 E — :=Itterte'd:rgerre'd for seismic Zone IN.submit (,) _ -:- 2M1.gel=t7e=a:ItrTel'renrst.cturel onsIneer for nom 3 < _ -._ _ . .4 =in IiiL 1: 3..Zli roar toovnted equipment N N: Z w 1.. IN z 11177111 _ L IM li 11 VICINITY M A P - N — . ,D i II g 1 —.— —4— — III ,. 1 z r , , 4 „.,...4, :41. -,1 ,If" I- ....--,L 4' ow*.1 il N.---,CFF,e.",-.719mc „' ,r.-,. WA-• c.0 ac re I-- 1 Mr' I, .Z.C.L.E.., 1 .14zeOlailkliii'*'". fill, 'ISR 4 F.r.a.18, N ,51-ra 4 61-D& •STAT.,., I -—.. ED -4- ITS.:'',!,',,".- 1 -,": KV FEMIIPIN :•' ' ' a CV I . icL . -..--:4-4-M Al " ' ' • 1-- 4 In wnlIti:u:s VW.;0'1. W 1 _ — • 0 :41 I ANL i kw I - — , _ Ap.. I . .., -,,_ - . . 1.--,r,.fflo "%1 i _ ‘ i-, — -:- LEGAL DESCRIPTION i • • 7,.: — :7E2,17i.=:,i1.7,E.:F.12-7;i71-1:7;`-°::1-=4!.- . t g CO O., ' 4a.e r.e e Fr.e,s ———•. z..tn.'r. .•‘ Comon....eto north..corm.of.1.1 Soctio. 0 . • '-'d.i '' ' .r.i. A _ n-..-Z.1:172,tr:nt-,...14'..V4===.1r•"""` :2 I . ., . ••••\ _ - ' ,..111111,111Villiilli-I'll ';:'.: 'i' bItItItb 4 RIFFEll.it7:11::1:1.11..:Fat!!!."1!::::,F,E.::.;11.°E.:P 1-jcaj 2 1 11 tIN lee ,: .: -4::'-'' k ''" ...,""•P'' Sp al 1 • •• ' .,.qi• -,ii :=.;-_:=2T;I:414f,:-.1L'=m.:',;;..17.'11'0:7` u °a „;,,,:.1-',.? • ,...' - L ' ,. .' i LI MOIL LiThil ! ! IMIIM lrealTornIr=o:Ziot...TatgoltdanattetZ41•114P5Mon .‹ n'"an 2 -J a .,.• .. T:7=4.no:tottot ottt„ot nom,ttoo ot toto toom.to tto toto a- MO V .:i.., ,,,ZerS,12.Z:e.an,rn,-sem.. • f===.=1"..e.:r4:1117f m f°'.*"'''''''."'a w Cheat t ..... —. • 4 4,1.".^ .a..,o a....mot., • • • . 2 . /) • I!" I,' I. 1 I III , ;a , . I 9 " _ _ -- " rr I N 11' ' (- // II-1 I s! I '_ _ \ r I 1\ �� ' D ( \ T11 n f 11 -00 zo �i � 01�u 1—_ 4 60 ,--- 0. Pxm \\�� aMi n° D 2,0 / I 1 1 , /1 N. / IIm 2 k 7 rr- _ 05 T1pse I � I � 1, � � I . -B W. - e o \___ "' j , 1 o--1., — _,,_—I. — Q " 1u 11l • t pw ... (.1 Id a'''' ____) 1) I 11_ 1 1.---00—./.=-1,..----,6----.y..-----A6---y-7,7,-is.7—r—r---/ -6.-- -Y 7- • • - � SrKI NGSz = oK 1 • Lrrcw:I� ' ./ ' T- II 48 4III � "s a= ys s A , _< Nik . .. . (.4. ',rev \ ti. I.2.1 ,i.. 1 IT1 Ii- .� -\— '; m, 6 —r t;.4�11. Oef:, '‘, kt,.. 3,-.7,1.''''"-I 414% a. v,..min%�".� „1 �i�i I II'I LI SCHEMATIC GKADIU6 4 1.,I L11, 1,60 W' nA- E 6 6 s e a o 1 s T tz 1 our=z s /�^_ BUSH,ROED&HITCHINGS,INC. l9;"4.`�4 c rn J I CIVIE ENGINEERS&LAND SURVEYORS SEAL n zT4 ST KG BT' viv au • I q.9 p u - E FEMTe.J,,uASHI HGTGH BRH Iu... w�� „H6 — — T - i S - C. di r — L I J —� PLANT SCHEDULE n F 9 ' —., . .I f�-rr. I I�'p-N IUL/Cq.{I.101)I-1M{P. �JL•5 K(:t+N4- {i I ,- ED D6 pUlaHus fcsnlPoua/IallooN rtAgt e c-L, ;D c m'I- V _.• ;{: eo PSeuentsuEl^kr-AzE 51/IzuyL 6 plrc c'-e' o:o o si. ( - • k .� —\ .•:: 6, feat,.NE7cpal'NY /NEVI!EIP-4 ax C-s' _ v 5`ti 1C, ¢ =• w 0 3a p,Pus rral r'Nlyu/ oH9azcrpo�.x a-I,' Icl ''----. :?:•:•4 I \ O 61 AGE12 cozGl.1.4ilb-1/'Ns I-I�LE 6'-6' 9 7(PJ-1 HIH. 1i1 WO —�\' •••• ya 5,4oNYHous A..q./l 4'l W5N 15'•1e" �% Um GI hNo4Nla_rp.3 il/pNaT1NW, 3-' 111.k �� «sa 'w Ae.Lu,cinwnlrloaA/AL L.Ia 3 a.Future ulng Wans:ion,.; Q — Iq \ cofalPasTER'Lawr,r" 4 cars 50'o.c. I.,,; �+ IS`:a: FIE)x.W.HEux'ram srFL1;'I/gmEN -"Ill, ,-.1"o.a. 410 1 Wpple I,-,r 2 I^' Q — k \ NOTES Id' I h —' - e.m ee .��..., .ieurt em orb- ...rr,ixe rL 4 _ - 1-10nv l-nronun vC rnucewne wroo).ma, 0.. -t..s ,1,1 MAT.*lam:,ArTuc mr aa.o-,y+...- � •!! C.017" (. � nx1rC-eerrwr n+w..imrwrin' W: �- - - ytaliH sCokrlauos Niirat TvrssIN \\ (lom. ss olue rrnw) arssurr 1-1 ,& .uHf+cees .s s.a.w(YC veTaL) ." - c acr a+o zw mcr c,eco .au..me CPc•rsrrs ..151,..E.s. 11I asx.,uu A.M. LuENua a 'y V rw.�Innev s ..r.com�rurtyz`ne�rs`pu, a, Y - ALL_LFNo1'al'K.AzenA T APGe.-v AUA 4a.TI laA 11'oI. in IN 8 0 I41 to _ H ri a to, �,,e' FI'vt wHLA.rproaJ- Q 0 y 1.eu...bap-wm ttielFY4 41 to N, \, uItOr �,Pyua `v�+IzPc yrera-,Jve H E r��r zzz uzb•Arm INI.b 11•PP N 1"Z- jo .I AR'R1 At MJp yLh�aQ rn QIlII f£W,rETu".u7.pup511 )_ Pwl.4�lYs o=9uPMyw+7 rPaNI q1 6!LL`'' to g A 1-e'w, m i',�,. a= ----..,t„„.,,..,...Pzm,ular<,FwTP arx+bt• tfli. pc _�,,,,,....f1NeFw. m • a �'�' N �I``r (YsN4h k'hu•IFP0-1,-t Y . cu /� U iar, II �� 3_ TREE STA1CNG 8 PLANTING DETAIL. v j� ! 11 m U le t moot, --.I',di- \ — 1.- TREE IN PLANTER BED ..i:�'xmo, Wq 3!� 6 S yp '� barb _ up OD AIDI I I I 1 1 9 — . AQ scale:1'—40r .s y In v SW 27th S I K I L1FAow.4. z'alelkj 9(s-1 0Wm EARTH ENTERPRISES nit rea.%"r11 L-1 BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE 8A -' 27 - 01• / * ttpiatiod SA.b/1 -S ? RECEIVED of RA, AUG 21 1981 Jane Mueller & Assoc. 4$ © °z SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 s o — CITY 0 F RENT 0_�N Coil Ot i�i om 9�9r ���Q� PLANN I NG D P )- '' g F E d1, I 6110 LE LD:NG/ZONHNG DEPT. APPLICATION FOR: OFFICE USE ONLY: �7 "p7 Application No. : Si� --�(' - ..� _ ECF No: Cry SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT Sec-Twnp-R `" • PERMIT Date Received 'lf Date Accepted CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Date Approved Date Denied I 1 VARIANCE Publication Date AFF Comprehensive P1anlrnJA)OcACTt3i?u\' L,, p K. I 1 EXEMPTION Zoning \fP, YfA,i D C-ro('�1 1 PA 1 Water Body -pR,1(3 �,'(( -).Roc. In addition to the information below, the applicant should include a site map and any other pertinent information which will assist in the review of this application. The Planning Department reserves the right to require additional information needed to evaluate the application (note permit procedure on the last page) . APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1 THROUGH 14 BELOW: 1. Name of Applicant ,44g5kA D/67'R/rn'r4 -$ MG 2. Mailing Address (00/ Sixr, a' .5'6w-rale SE4rrG�' / �F}. Polo$ /Telephone: � G - 3ao0 3. Applicant is: N, Owner ❑ Lessee ❑ Contract Purchaser ❑ Other (Specify) 4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant: /Telephone 5. General location of proposed project (give street address if any or nearest street and intersection) ow S. jitJ: .9941 st GUesr er= L/N° ,due, • 6. Legal Description ( if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) : 7. Name of adjacent water area or wetlands: .SPR/AEG t3e6o, . G et-7ER Ciec Gocil- h.) • 8. Intended use of property: ®F /c /, / rt /,6O1?'Oiv ,r¢G/'/i7/ • 9. Generally describe the property and existing improvements: crop /5 €45/44 (a-t —' /45 .PPizoe aN 5/ 10. A. Total construction cost and fal.r market, value of proposed project include additional developments contemplated but .not included in this application: B. Construction dates (month and year) for which permit is requested: Begin 07-/. /917 End 'e '7 / 9cS'a 11. Does this project require a shoreline location?-Explain. 1 • 12. List any other permits for this project from state, federal , local governmental agencies or the City of Renton for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for, and if so, the date of the application, whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same, and number of the application or permit: 04/044 Amy l;A -ce 13. Site and vicinity maps (refer to application instructions) : 14. Additional information: 15. VARIANCE CRITERIA If the applicant is seeking a variance, the applicant must include a written (justification) narrative addressing the following criteria as 'ispecified in Section 173-14-150 of the Washington Administrative Code: A. Development On Land. 1. That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards set forth in the applicable City of Renton Shoreline. Master Program precludes or significantly interferes with a reasonable b__ permitted use of the property. it • • • • [ •__ LEGAL • DESCRIPTION • That portion of the northeast quarter of. the northeast quarter of • Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. in Ring County, State of Washington, described as follows: Commencing atlthe northeast corner of said Section; - Thence south along the east line of said Section a distance of 180.01 feet to an intersection with, a line parallel to and 180 feet southerly, measured • at right angles to the north line of said Section; • Thence westerly, parallel with the north line of said Section 20 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to and 20 feet westerly, measured at right angles, to the east line of said Section, and the true point of beginning; Thence southerly 1074.37 feet along said line parallel to and 20 feet • ? westerly measured at right angles to the east line of said Section; Thence north 88°24'48" west 560 feet; • Thence northerly, parallel to the east line of said Section, 1095.48 feet more or less to the intersection with a line which runs north 87°12'59" west from the true point of beginning; Thence easterll �, parallel with the north line of said Section, to the true j point of beginning. EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Renton for road purposes by deed recorded under 4ecording Number 8401240272. • 11", .4 VI CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON OUTLINE OF PERMIT PROCEDURE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT I 1. The applicant obtains the permit forms , completes and returns them to the 'Planning Department. 2 . Applicant puts public notice in newspaper of general circulation in Renton once a week for two weeks . 3. Interested parties may submit comments to Renton Planning Depart- ment for 30 days following last public notice . 4 . After at least 30 days from last public notice , Renton Planning Department grants or denies permit. 5 . Within eight , ( 8) days from the Renton Planning Department action, copies of the action taken and the application form shall be sub- mitted to the Washington Department of Ecology , and the office of the State Attorney General . 6 . If permit is : granted, permittee cannot begin construction until 30 days after date permit is granted. If permittee is informed that a review of the permit is to be held by the Hearings Board then he must further delay construction until the review is com- pleted. 7 . The minimum time required to process a permit is 68 days . 8. If permit isidenied, applicant may appeal to Shoreline Hearings Board, as outlined below. APPEAL PROCEDURE 1 Appeal initiatedlby Department of Appeal initiated by the applicant Ecology or Attorney General or by a private party 1 . Either the Department of 1 . Any person , including the Ecology or Attorney General applicant, aggrieved by may request review of the the granting or denying of granting or denying of a a permit may request an permit within 30 days of appeal . The request is sent the action of the Renton to the Department of Ecology, Planning Department. Notice the Attorney General , and the is sent to the Planning De- Hearings Board. partment and ', the Hearings Board. 2 . Either the Department or the Attorney General must certify 2 . The Hearings Board conducts a the request as valid for the review as requested and accepts review to continue . Certi- or overturns the decision of fication must be given within the City of Renton . 30 days . 3 . Any part to the review may 3 . If the. request is certified, appeal the Hearings Board the Hearings Board conducts decision to Superior Court. a review and sustains or overturns the decision of the City of Renton . 4 . Any party who fails to obtain certification or any party to a review before the Hearings Board may appeal to Superior Court. City of Renton Planning Dept. February 9, 1973 REV. : September 12, 1980 2. That the hardship is specifically related to the property, and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features and the application of the master program, and not, for example, from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions. 3. That the design of the project will be compatible with other permitted activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or the shoreline environment designation. 4. That the variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area, and will be the minimum necessary to afford relief. 5. That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect. B. Development either waterward of the ordinary high water mark or within marshes, bogs, or swamps: 1. That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional nor performance standards set forth in the applicable City of Renton Shoreline Master Program precludes or significantly interferes with a reasonable permitted use of the property. 2. That the hardship•is specifically related to the property, and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features and the application of the master program, and not, for example from deed restrictions or the applicant's{ own actions. i I 3. That the design of the project will be compatible with other permitted activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or the shoreline environment designation. 4. That the variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the !area, and will be the minimum necessary to afford relief. 5. That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect. 6. That the public rights of navigation and use of the shorelines will not be adversely affected by the granting of the variance. STATE OF LUASHINGTON ) CITY OF RENTON ) ss I, - �— (cd, .. tere_ _ , being dully sworn, certify that I am the above-named applicant for; a permit to construct a substantial developmen :. an to e eline Management Act of 1971, and that the foreg. • g statements, answers, an. ' .formation are in all respects true and correct to th? best of my knowledge and belief. Si gnaturi 45 --ie404- frt owl Subscribed and sworn to me this day of / ' • Notary Public in and for - State of Washington, residing at 171pj ,s Pt II o100-r 13U1LDiiN!G/ZDNING DEPT. d i 4EMORANDUM To Marillynn' Peterson, City Clerk Date 2/18/91 From S7 ?eeger • Subject Alaska ;Distributors SA-071-87, SP-095-87 This project has been withdrawn by the applicant and .is ready to be filed with the City Clerk. I k CITY ENT � �i 4 ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director i March 9, :1988 Alaska Distributors 4601 Sixth Avenue South Seattle, 1WA 98108 i i RE: Environmental Detelinination for Fill and Grade Project File SP-095-87, Property located North side of S.W. 27th Street. 1 Dear Sirs: This letter is to inform you of the Environmental Review Committee' s revised decision on their review of your project. As you are aware, the Committee had issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated on January 18, 1988 . There was a fifteen day comment period which ended February 2 , 1988 . During this period the Committee was made aware of new information from the Department of Ecology with respect to the City° s flood control project in the Valley (P-i and P-9 Channels) . As a result of the information provided, the Committee at its regular meeting on February 23 , 1988 , revised its earlier decision on the Determination. The Committee is now prepared to issue a Determination of Significance due to the fact that mitigation measures for flood storage capacity loss cannot be met at this time without further istudy. Previously, the City Policy has been to require applicants to compensate for filling by digging out an equal portion of material below the 100 year flood plain elevation for these portions of the site below this level which are filled. This digging in the past has been done in the P-i Channel alignment. However, at this time there are questions, being raised regarding the flond control program in the valley that must be answered before we can proceed. . 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 I Alaska Distributors March 9, 1988 Page 4 Rather than prepare an environmental impact statement the Committee would recommend that you withdraw your application and work with us and the other Valley property owners on resolving the issue of how and where compensating flood storage should be provided and what configuration any system of channels and wetland for retaining storm drainage in the Valley should take. A meeting with Valley property owners is proposed to be set up within the next 2 to 3 week. The City is required by the State Environmental Protection Act to issue threshold decisions within (20) days when there is new information provided. In this case, we would like to know your Company's decision as to whether it wishes to withdraw the application, or not, by 5: 00 p.m. on March 14, 1988. Should a decision be made not to withdraw the application at this time, the Committee believes it will have no other choice than to issue a Determination of Significance. If you have any questions please call J9anette Samek-McKague or myself at 235-2550. (72) e Envi . men -al Review Committee, / f el Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/sgr c:alaska CITY OF IINNTON kw, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director March 9, 1988 Pat Kerr 130 Lakeside #250 Seattle, WA 98122 RE: Environmental Determination for Fill and Grade Project File SP-095-87, Property located on the North side of S.W. 27th Street. Dear Ms. Kerr: This letter is to inform you of the Environmental Review Committee's revised decision on their review of your project. As you are aware, the Committee had issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated on January 18, 1988. There was a fifteen day comment period which ended February 2, 1988. During this period the Committee was made aware of new information from the Department of Ecology with respect to the City' s flood control project in the Valley (P-1 and P-9 Channels) . As a result of the information provided, the Committee at its regular meeting on February 23 , 1988 , revised its earlier decision on the Determination. The Committee is now prepared to issue a Determination of Significance due to the fact that mitigation measures for flood storage capacity loss cannot be met at this time without further study. Previously, the City Policy has been to require applicants to compensate for filling by digging out an equal portion of material below the 100 year flood plain elevation for these portions of the site below this level which are filled. This digging in the past has been done in the P-1 Channel alignment. However, at this time there are questions being raised regarding the flood control program in the valley that must be answered before we can proceed. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Pat Kerr March 9, 1988 Page 2 Rather than prepare an environmental impact statement the Committee would recommend that you withdraw your application and work with us and the other Valley property owners on resolving the issue of how and where compensating flood storage should be provided and what configuration any system of channels and wetland for retaining storm drainage in the Valley should take. A meeting with Valley property owners is proposed to be set up within the next 2 to 3 week. The City is required by the State Environmental Protection Act to issue threshold decisions within (20) days when there is new information provided. In this case, we would like to know your Company' s decision as to whether it wishes to withdraw the application, or not, by 5: 00 p.m. on March 14 , 1988 . Should a decision be made not to withdraw the application at this time, the Committee believes it will have no other choice than to issue a Determination of Significance. If you have any questions please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or myself at 235-2550. F the Envirom ent 1 iew Committee, V Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/sgr c:alaska �� - CITY OF RENTON 4.. N.? BUILDING & 2;ONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director March 9, 1988 Lance Mueller & Associates 130 Lakeside #250 Seattle, WA 98122 RE: Environmental Determination for Fill and Grade Project File SP-095-87, Property located on the North side of S.W. 27th Street. Dear Mr. Mueller: This letter is to inform you of the Environmental Review Committee's revised decision on their review of your project. As you are aware, the Committee had issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated on January 18 , 1988 . There was a fifteen day comment period which ended February 2 , 1988. During this period the Committee was made aware of new information from the Department of Ecology with respect to the City's flood control project in the Valley (P-1 and P-9 Channels) . As a result of the information provided, the Committee at its regular meeting on February 23 , 1988, revised its earlier decision on the Determination. The Committee is now prepared to issue a Determination of Significance due to the fact that mitigation measures for flood storage capacity loss cannot be met at this time without further study. Previously, the City Policy has been to require applicants to compensate for filling by digging out an equal portion of material below the 100 year flood plain elevation for these portions of the site below this level which are filled. This digging in the past has been done in the P-i Channel alignment. However, at this time there are questions being raised regarding the flood control program in the valley that must be answered before we can proceed. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Lance Mueller & Associates March 9, 1988 Page 6 Rather than prepare an environmental impact statement the Committee would recommend that you withdraw your application and work with us and the other Valley property owners on resolving the issue of how and where compensating flood storage should be provided and what configuration any system of channels and wetland for retaining storm drainage in the Valley should take. A meeting with Valley property owners is proposed to be set up within the next 2 to 3 week. The City is required by the State Environmental Protection Act to issue threshold decisions within (20) days when there is new information provided. In this case, we would like to know your Company's decision as to whether it wishes to withdraw the application, or not, by 5: 00 p.m. on March 14, 1988 . Should a decision be made not to withdraw the application at this time, the Committee believes it will have no other choice than to issue a Determination of Significance. If you have any questions please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or myself at 235-2550. Envir ent Review Committee, aafil Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/sgr c:alaska lance mueller associates r- ° �` LI isr�. architects JAN 2 O1Q88 January 19, 1988 Mr. Don Erickson CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPT. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Mr. Jim Hanson CITY OF RENTON BUILDING DEPT. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS Dear Sirs: Please hold in abeyance the permit applications for Alaska Distributors until the council appeal #CU-064-87 by Mike Mastro and Benton Smith is decided. Sincerely, LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS Bob Fadden Associate BF:ks cc: G & M Investments Alaska Distributors 130 lakeside • suite 250 • seattle,washington 98122[208]325-2553 lance mueller ale,cal•senior aseocietee:robert olscheweky,eileen furney associates:robert fadden,michael gelbraith,richard harnieh,robert wells a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by end under the supervision of registered architects Public Notice NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION • RENTON,WA The • Environmental Review committee (ERC)has issued a Determination of Signif- • icance for the following projects: Audrey Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath states (ALAS LANCE A D UE LUR A D SCIATE that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the BUTION WAREHOUSE. Applications for approval of 1)a site plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the con- VALLEY DAILY NEWS struction of a 148,000sq. ft. warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2)a • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition pealaita% and grade adetollowsPPciimtelYaoo cubic yards of al e- Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers rial on the site; and 3) shorelines substan- tial development permit. Property located are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six on the north side of S.W.27th Street at the months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published 800 block and directly west of Springbrook Cr in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King 87eek. File Nos. ECF-060-87 and SA-071- County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Further information regarding this action newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington fori rtm ble in ent, Munithecipal Building, Renton, King County. Washington, 235-2550. Agencies, affected tribes and members of the public are invit- ed to comment on the scope of the EIS. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Comments must be submitted to the City of Renton Edition Auburn Edition (and not in Renton by 5:00 p.m.on February 22, 1988. ' X Any appeal of the ERC action must be supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by during the below stated period.The annexed notice a 5:00 p.m.,February 9, 1988. Public Notice Published in the Valley Daily News,Jan- uary 25, 1988. R2771 was published on January 25, 1988 R2771 • The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 2 5 .6 0 . Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 9 t h day of Ja n»ar y 19 NTniN Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, `I King County, Washington. / "LINING DFPT. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WA The Environmental Review committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Significance for the following projects: LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATES (ALASKA DISTRIBUTOR OFFICE/DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE Applications for approval of 1) a site plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148, 000 sq. ft. warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approximately 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) shorelines substantial development permit. Property located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly west of Springbrook Creek. File Nos. ECF-060-87 and SA-071-87. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Agencies, affected tribes and members of the public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. Comments must be submitted to the City of Renton by 5:00 p.m. on February 22 , 1988. Any appeal of the ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by 5: 00 p.m. , February 9, 1988. Published: January 25, 1988 11, ed61 4 CITY OF F'=° ENT. N rap 'a BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director January 18, 1988 Alaska Distributor 4601 Sixth Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98108 RE: Environmental Review Determination, File SA-071-87, SP-095-87 Dear Sirs: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of your Site Approval request for property located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly west of Springbrook Creek. The Committee on January 13 , 1988 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the fill application be limited only to the Phase I fill until such time that the City, in conjunction with various State and Federal agencies, completes an evaluation of the Wetlands in the Valley including those currently on the site. 2 . That the applicant contract with a licensed professional geotechnical engineer, approved by the City, to monitor the types of fill material being deposited on the site and to certify the level of cleanliness of the fill material being placed on the subject site. 3 . That the applicant work with the Public Works Department and the Police Department on acceptable haul routes and hours of operation. 4 . That the applicant provide a wheel washing facility on-site with a sedimentation pond. 5 . That the applicant design construction entrances with a rock covering or other material acceptable to the Public Works Department. This entrance should be approximately 20 ' wide x 50 ' deep or of a size acceptable to the Public Works Department. 6. That the applicant provide a $5000. 00 bond to the City to cover street cleaning and potential City liability. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Alaska Distributor Environmental Review Determination January 18, 1988 Page 2 7 . That the applicant provide acceptable compensating flood storage capacity for that portion of the site which is below the 100 year flood plain level bringing that portion up to an elevation of 16 1/2 feet. The applicant shall work with the City's Department of Public Works staff with respect to the amount of compensating flood storage and the location of said compensating storage. 8 . That the applicant provide both on-site active and passive recreational space. At a minimum this shall include outdoor seating and two picnic tables and a workout room or a half court basketball area for employees. , 9. That the applicant contribute to the City a traffic mitigation assessment fee in the amount of $231, 870 based on $197. 00 per ADVT since the applicant's project is located in the Valley Transportation Benefit District. NOTE: The applicant may be eligible for a $9. 00 per trip refund if they have an approved TSM program. 10. That the applicant provide a traffic signal warrant analysis and traffic signal design at the intersection of Lind Avenue A.W. and S.W. 27th St. The applicant shall install the traffic signal if warranted. The installation cost for the signal is not included in the Benefit district assessment fee. 11. That the applicant redesign the parking area, placing approximately 116 spaces into a landscaped reserve area as allowed under Section 4-2208 (12) . 12 . That the applicant provide the City with the necessary easements along the Springbrook Creek frontage for flood control and maintenance. OTHER: In addition to the above mitigating measures, the Environmental Review Committee identified that the project's employees will use the nearby trail system once it is constructed along the east bank of Springbrook Creek and therefore the applicant should consider making a voluntary contribution to the City to mitigate the off-site recreational impacts. . f Alaska Distributor Environmental Review Determination January 18, 1988 Page 3 Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end February 2, 1988. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. Appeals are made to the City's Hearing Examiner. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner for your application. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235--2550 and ask for myself or Jeanette Samek- HcKague. For the Environmental Review Committee. �; . .I _mot_ ff / Donald K. Erickson, AICP /L-6> Zoning Administrator DKE:cs CITY F RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director January 18, 1988 Mr. Bob Fadden Lance Mueller & Associates 130 Lakeside Seattle, WA 98122 RE: Environmental Review Determination, File SA-071-87, SP-095-87 Dear Mr. Fadden: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of your Site Approval request for property located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly west of Springbrook Creek. The Committee on January 13, 1988 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the fill application be limited only to the Phase I fill until such time that the City, in conjunction with various State and Federal agencies, completes an evaluation of the Wetlands in the Valley including those currently on the site. 2 . That the applicant contract with a licensed professional geotechnical engineer, approved by the City, to monitor the types of fill material being deposited on the site and to certify the level of cleanliness of the fill material being placed on the subject site. 3 . That the applicant work with the Public Works Department and the Police Department on acceptable haul routes and hours of operation. 4 . That the applicant provide a wheel washing facility on-site with a sedimentation pond. 5. That the applicant design construction entrances with a rock covering or other material acceptable to the Public Works Department. This entrance should be approximately 20 ' wide x 50 ' deep or of a size acceptable to the Public Works Department. 6. That the applicant provide a $5000. 00 bond to the City to cover street cleaning and potential City liability. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Mr. Bob Fadden Environmental Review Determination January 18, 1988 Page 2 7. That the applicant provide acceptable compensating flood storage capacity for that portion of the site which is below the 100 year flood plain level bringing that portion up to an elevation of 16 1/2 feet. The applicant shall work with the City's Department of Public Works staff with respect to the amount of compensating flood storage and the location of said compensating storage. 8. That the applicant provide both on-site active and passive recreational space. At a minimum this shall include outdoor seating and two picnic tables and a workout room or a half court basketball area for employees. 9. That the applicant contribute to the City a traffic mitigation assessment fee in the amount of $231, 870 based on $197. 00 per ADVT since the applicant's project is located in the Valley Transportation Benefit District. NOTE: The applicant may be eligible for a $9. 00 per trip refund if they have an approved TSM program. 10. That the applicant provide a traffic signal warrant analysis and traffic signal design at the intersection of Lind Avenue A.W. and S.W. 27th St. The applicant shall install the traffic signal if warranted. The installation cost for the signal is not included in the Benefit district assessment fee. 11. That the applicant redesign the parking area, placing approximately 116 spaces into a landscaped reserve area as allowed under Section 4-2208 (12) . 12 . That the applicant provide the City with the necessary easements along the Springbrook Creek frontage for flood control and maintenance. OTHER: In addition to the above mitigating measures, the Environmental Review committee identified that the project' s employees will use the nearby trail system once it is constructed along the east bank of Springbrook Creek and therefore the applicant should consider making a voluntary contribution to the City to mitigate the off-site recreational impacts. Mr. Bob Fadden Environmental Review Determination January 18, 1988 Page 3 Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end February 2, 1988. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. Appeals are made to the City's Hearing Examiner. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner for your application. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2550 and ask for myself or Jeanette Samek- McKague. For the Environmental Review Committee. „(.7 Donald K. Erickson, AICP ,% G✓ Zoning Administrator DKE:cs CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-060-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-071-87, SP-095-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applications for approval of 1) a. site plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148, 000 sq. ft. warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approximately 47,400 cubic yards of material, on the site; and 3) shorelines substantial development permit. PROPONENT: Lance Mueller & Associates LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly west of Springbrook Creek. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from January 18, 1988. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , February 2, 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: January 13, 1988 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 18, 1988 • Ronald G. Nelson Larry M. Springer Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Alaska Distributor Office/Distribution Warehouse ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-060-87 APPLICATION NO. : SA-071-87, SP-095-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applications for approval of 1) a site plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148, 000 sq. ft. warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approximately 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) shorelines substantial development permit. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly west of Springbrook Creek. CONDITIONS: 1. That the fill application be limited only to the Phase I fill until such time that the City, in conjunction with various State and Federal agencies, completes an evaluation of the Wetlands in the Valley including those currently on the site. 2 . That the applicant contract with a licensed professional geotechnical engineer, approved by the City, to monitor the types of fill material being deposited on the site and to certify the level of cleanliness of the fill material being placed on the subject site. 3 . That the applicant work with the Public Works Department and the Police Department on acceptable haul routes and hours of operation. 4. That the applicant provide a wheel washing facility on-site with a sedimentation pond. 5. That the applicant design construction entrances with a rock covering or other material acceptable to the Public Works Department. This entrance should be approximately 20 ' wide x 50 ' deep or of a size acceptable to the Public Works Department. 6. That the applicant provide a $5000. 00 bond to the City to cover street cleaning and potential City liability. 7. That the applicant provide acceptable compensating flood storage capacity for that portion of the site which is below the 100 year flood plain level bringing that portion up to an elevation of 16 1/2 feet. The applicant shall work with the City's Department of Public Works staff with respect to the amount of compensating flood storage and the location of said compensating storage. 8. That the applicant provide both on-site active and passive recreational space. At a minimum this shall include outdoor seating and two picnic tables and a workout room or a half court basketball area for employees. 9 . That the applicant contribute to the City a traffic mitigation assessment fee in the amount of $231,870 based on $197. 00 per ADVT since the applicant's project is located in the Valley Transportation Benefit District. NOTE: The applicant may be eligible for a $9. 00 per trip refund if they have an approved TSM program. 10. That the applicant provide a traffic signal warrant analysis and traffic signal design at the intersection of Lind Avenue A.W. and S.W. 27th St. The applicant shall install the traffic signal if warranted. The installation cost for the signal is not included in the Benefit district assessment fee. r// 11. That the applicant redesign the parking area, placing approximately 116 spaces into a landscaped reserve area as allowed under. Section 4-2208 (12) . 12 . That the applicant provide the City with the necessary easements along the Springbrook Creek frontage for flood control and maintenance. OTHER: In addition, the Environmental Review Committee identified that the project' s employees will use the nearby trail system once it is constructed along the east bank of Springbrook Creek and therefore the applicant should consider making a voluntary contribution to the City to mitigate off-site recreation impacts. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON SCOPE OF EIS FILE NUMBER(S) : ECF-060-87 and SA-071-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applications for approval of 1) a site plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148, 000 sq. ft. warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approximately 47, 400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) shorelines substantial development permit. PROPONENT: Lance Mueller & Associates LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly west of Springbrook Creek. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department EIS REQUIRED. The lead agency has determined this proposal is likely to have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) and will be prepared. An environmental checklist or other materials indicating likely environmental impacts can be reviewed at our offices. The lead agency has identified the following areas for discussion in the EIS: Earth, water, plants, animals and transportation. l SCOPING: Agencies, affected tribes, and members of the public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. You may comment on alternatives, mitigation measures, probable significant adverse impacts, and licenses or other approvals that may be required. Your comments must be submitted in writing and received before February 22, 1988. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, WA 98055 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination of significance in writing pursuant to RMC 4-3016 accompanied by a $75. 00 appeal fee no later than February 9, 1988, to Land Use Hearing Examiner 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. PUBLICATION DATE: January 25, 1988 Ronald G. Nelson Larry M. Springer Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director • . . N. OT I C E ENVIRONMENTAL • DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-060-87 AND SA-071-87 'APPLICANT LANCE. MUELLER AND Assoc. (ALASKA DISTRIBUTOR OFF I CE/ DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE) PROPOSED T Pur IONS FOR APPROVAL OF 1) SITE PLAN FOR PHASE I OF A COMPLEX TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 148,000 SQ.FT. WAREHSE W/24, 500 SQ, FT. OFFICE MEZZANINE; 2) A SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE APPROX. 47,`400 CU.YD MATERIAL ON SITE; AND 3) A SHORELINES SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOP , GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NOR" " SIDE OF S.W. 27TH 'ST. AT THE 800 BLOCK AND DIRECTLY WEST OF SPRINGBROO1 .CREEK. . • POSTED, TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. • THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES IK1DOES NOT • HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL .WILL NOT •• BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY 5 P.M. FEBRUARY 2, 1988 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY ' BE FILED WITH 'THE RENTON. HEARING EXAMINER . BY 5:00 P.M., ' FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON • BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. ,• DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. • • Public Notice AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ' AudreyBenner RENTON,WASHINGTON ,being first duly sworn on oath states The Environmental Review Committee that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON- SIGNIFICANCE — MITIGATED for the fol- lowing project(s) under the authority of the ReVALLEY DAILY NEWS have completed al Code. The Applicant(s)s - have completed a mitigation process pursu- 197-11-350. ant Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition anLA CECMUELLER AND ASSOCIATES (ALASKA DISTRIBUTOR OFFICE/DISTRI- Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers BUTION WAREHOUSE) are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Applications for approval of 1)a site plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the con- months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published struction of a 148,000 sq. ft. warehouse ; in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2)a Count Washington.The ValleyDailyNews has been approved as a legal special permit for fill and grade to allow S'� g pp approximately 47,400 cubic yards of materi- newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for al on the site; and 3)shorelines substantial King County. development permit. Property located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the , 800 block and directly west of Springbrook The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Creek. File Nos. ECF-060-87 and SA-071- 87. , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in This decision will be finalized in 15 days. supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Written comments received after 5:00 Feb-1 ruary 2, 1988, will not be considered. A during the below stated period.The annexed notice a fourteen (14) day appeal period will corn- ivotice of Environmental Determination mence following the finalization of DNS. The mitigation measures imposed by the was published on January 18 , 1988 R2755 City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, I Renton,Washington.Phone 235-2540. Published in the Valley Daily News Jan. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the 18, 1988.R2755. sumof $ ," ° U Subscribed and sworn to before me 2 8 t h day ofJ an uary 19 88 Notary '`-(blic for the State of Washington, � �� ` ;..� 'i� residing at Federal Way, L.J King County, Washington. u.�'J ,a' / /;i �N G i ro �-T. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON-SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATES (ALASKA DISTRIBUTOR OFFICE/DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE Applications for approval of 1) a site plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148, 000 sq. ft. warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approximately 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) shorelines substantial development permit. Property located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly west of Springbrook Creek. File Nos. ECF-060-87 and SA-071-87 . This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5: 00 February 2, 1988, will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS. The mitigation 'measures imposed by the City of Renton° s Environmental Review Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington. Phone 235-2540. PUBLISHED: January 18, 1988 - ( (4) ) BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DECEMBER 9, 1987 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Lance Mueller & Associates PROJECT: Alaska Distributor Office/Distribution Warehouse ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-060-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applications for approval of 1) a site plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148, 000 sq. ft. warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approximately 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) shorelines substantial development permit. i LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly west of Springbrook Creek. B. ISSUES: Whether sufficient information has been provided on the source of fill for the site. The applicant has not disclosed the source of fill materials. The applicant proposes to place 47, 400 cu. yd. of material on the site which is located adjacent to the Springbrook, P-9 Channel, the P-1 Channel and the City owned wetland; Whether sufficient information has been provided on any wet areas located on the property; . Whether sufficient information has been provided on measures to keep pollutants out of the Springbrook Creek drainage ditch and other drainage ways and the City owned wetland during construction and during the life of the project; Whether sufficient information has been provided on haul routes for new fill material; Whether sufficient measures have been provided on measures to keep streets clean from debris; Whether sufficient information has been provided on compensating flood storage; Building and Zoning De -rtment Environmental Review _mittee Staff Report Lance Mueller & Associates December 9, 1987 Page 2 Whether sufficient measures have been provided to mitigate traffic impacts; Whether sufficient information has been provided on active and passive recreational opportunities for employees; and Whether sufficient information has been provided with respect to hours of operation for the fill project. • C: RECOMMENDATIONS: . Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the fill application be limited only to the Phase I fill until such time that the City, in conjunction with various State and Federal agencies, completes an evaluation of the Wetlands in the Valley including those currently on the site. 2 . That the fill material be certified as to its cleanliness by a licensed geotechnical engineer. 3. That the applicant work with the Public Works Department and the Police Department on acceptable haul routes and hours of operation. 4. That the applicant provide a wheel washing facility on-site with a sedimentation pond. 5. That the applicant design construction entrances with, a rock covering or other material acceptable to the Public Works Department. This entrance should be approximately 20' wide x 50' deep or of a size acceptable to the Public Works Department. 6. That the applicant provide a $5000. 00 bond to the City to cover street cleaning and potential City liability. 7. That the applicant contract with a licensed professional geotechnical engineer, approved by the City, to monitor the types of fill material being deposited on the site. 8. That the applicant provide acceptable compensating flood storage capacity for approximately 17,400 cu.yds. of fill for Phase I at a location or locations determined appropriate by the City. Building and Zoning D trtment Environmental Review ... mittee Staff Report Lance Mueller & Associates December 9,. 1987 Page 3 9. That the applicant provide both on- site active and passive recreational space. At a minimum this shall include outdoor seating and two picnic tables • and a workout room or a half court basketball area for employees. 10. That the applicant contribute to the City a traffic mitigation assessment fee in the amount of $231,870 based on $197.00 per AWVT since the applicant's project is located in the Valley Transportation Benefit District. 11. That the applicant provide a traffic signal warrant analysis and traffic signal design at the intersection of Lind Avenue A.W. and S.W. 27th St. The applicant shall install the traffic signal if warranted. The installation cost for the signal is not included in the Benefit district assessment fee. 11. That the applicant redesign the parking area, placing approximately 116 spaces into a landscaped reserve area as allowed under Section 4-2208 (12) . D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. Wash down for the lugs to avoid tracking debris on roadway. 2. Fill haul route approval. Fire Prevention Bureau: No comments. 1 Design Engineering: No comments. Traffic Engineering: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. Assessment for Transportation Benefit District: Office 26, 305 sq ft X 17o70X$197=$91,723 1000 Warehouse 145,780 sct ft X 4.88X$197=$140, 147 1000 Total Amount $231,870 (To be paid when permit is issued) 2 . Provide for traffic signal warrant analysis and traffic signal design at Lind Ave. S.W. and S.W. 27th Street. If traffic signal is warranted, the installation shall be provided and the cost shall be in addition to the Transportation Benefit District assessment. / • , • Building and Zoning D Lrtment Environmental Review imittee Staff Report Lance Mueller & Associates December 9, 1987 ; Page 4 / Utility Engineering: Reviewer made no comments. Parks and Recreation: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. There are four (4) main issues that need to be addressed by the proposed development. The most important issue is the City's Springbrook Trail System. Lesser, but nevertheless important issues are the development of the City's Wetland Park directly south of the site, a small scale on-site active recreation facility and finally, the requested reduction in parking. 2. The City's Springbrook Trail System is the main north/south pedestrian and bicycle separated right-of-way trail for the Valley. Construction of a section of this trail system would be the most important off-site mitigation measure the project proponent could undertake. This project should develop a site plan that takes full advantage of the trail to the east and the proposed Wetland Park to the south. 3 . The applicant has already proposed to install a shower facility, which could be complimented by an on-site active recreation facility, such as a workout room, a half court basketball area or a tennis practice backboard. 4. Finally, the applicant could presumably address the above issues more effectively if the parking requirements were reduced. However, even if the applicant does not see it in those trade-off terms, it is still a reasonable request which this department supports. Building Division: No comments. Zoning Division: Reviewer provided the following comments: 1. Substantial Shorelines Permit is now exempt. 2. Should a trail system be developed within or near the 40' wide wildlife preserve along the west side of existing Springbrook Creek. 3. Include passive recreational amenities, seating, picnic tables. 4. Replace Vine maple in wildlife planting area with larger canopy type tree. Also include berry type plants to mix in with the proposed plantings. Building and Zoning D irtment Environmental Review ..u. umittee Staff Report Lance Mueller & Associates December 9, 1987 Page 5 • Policy Development: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. What is the source of the 47,400 cubic yards of fill? 2 . What measures will be taken to protect Springbrook Creek from any potential contaminants during construction? 3 . The manufacturing park zone requires a unified theme and substantial setbacks and landscaping requirements. Does this proposal adequately meet these requirements? 4 . The applicant should be required to sign a restrictive covenant prohibiting the development of the greenbelt area. 5. Pedestrian linkages should be provided between the project and the proposed pedestrian trail along Springbrook Creek. 6. Does this proposal really need 285 parking spaces for the anticipated 80 employees? Perhaps some of this parking could be eliminated and replaced with additional landscaping (which would be more in line with the policies and intent of the manufacturing park designation) and on-site passive recreational features. 7. Additional information should be provided on the number of trips/day. 8. Will the applicant participate in the Valley T.I.P.? F f, OF Re� A 4�•6 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT $ ® z DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING � . 235-2631 • rn MUNICIPAL BUILDING . 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 tr 134 0,941 1- -0 SEPI°4‘ P• BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR c".e...y r1p s 'kiroN MEMORANDUM ' 8V19198l DATE: November 18, 1987, TO: Building and Zoning Department FROM: Bob Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS DEVELOPMENT at S.W. 17th St. and Flood Control I have several items that should be addressed on the Alaska Distributors development along Springbrook Creek north of S.W. 27th Street. 1 . 100-year flood plain elevation - There are three FEMA maps for this area. It has been the Public Works intention to use the worse case elevation recognizing that the three maps are based upon three different flood situations and P-1 configurations. 100-year 1981 FEMA Maps - 16.0 to 17.0 (average = 16.5) 100-year 1983 FEMA Maps - ' 15.0 to. 16.0 (average = 15.5) 100-year 1987 FEMA Maps - Shows elevation 16.0 at S.W. 16th St. and end of map update should expect 16-17 at Alaska site. 2. Springbrook Easements - The Alaska Distributor frontage along Springbrook Creek requires additional easements for flood control and maintenance. The creek bottom is within the Drainage District #1 40' right-of-way. However, their easement does not extend up the bank, nor does Drainage District #1 have room to dredge the channel, from the bank. Public Works needs: a. 40' wide drainage/utility/public access/landscaping/ and wildlife along the east edge of the project; b. a 20' wide maintenance road and easement, outboard and west of Springbrook and the 40' bank easement; c. additional 50' Utility Maintenance Easement over the driveways and parking lots of the Alaska Distributor site - outboard and west of Springbrook and the 40' bank easement; OR d. 50' wide Maintenance Easement along the north side of the property along the P-9 right-of-way. . 1 - Building & Zoning Department November 19, 1987 Page Two 3. Flood Plain Compensating Storage - Under our old, existing Flood Plain Policy begun by Dave Clemens, the previous Policy Development Director, and confirmed by the City Council , all filling below the 100-year flood plain must be compensated by digging out an equal volume below the 100- year flood plain. If this site is subject to a flood plain elevation of 16.5, all filling below must be dug out somewhere else. Public Works recommends digging out some portion of the P-1 Channel that is owned or controlled by the City. Phase II - New fill of 30,00 C.Y. - compensating storage must be dug out. Phase I - New fill of 17,650 C.Y. plus 11 ,100 C.Y. displaced by building plus 8,150 C.Y. moved from mound on site to fill low areas. 36,900 C.Y. compensating storage must be dug out. 66,900 C.Y. TOTAL. This is equivalent to digging 2580 L.F. of the P-1 Channel outfall section. Thankyou. 1D.7.20.REB:mf .."iG9'9i,<J,w/ o -' V • • REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS _,) f I L L: ri'' ''7 19b? 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME A/ys4-.8 �is-T/4/�via.ES U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS s. Gem• a/ T7/ si FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: /7;, soo FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: /7-.. 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE I1, USING AREA (A): � 017-, GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: -- — IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B)PM (C) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): CIF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) 6 , ac-a GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: _3 , Uc'G • GPM CE) CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT; USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAR. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 11 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH 76 , ADD /0 % 3 20% MAX. EAST v2 Go ADD % 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH • 70 ADD /,D $ 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST .3o ADD ,&O 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : /49 % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJUSTMENT: /i/ce GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: �� GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) ' CD+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: SAC GPM (H) 1. SIGNED: I_V-A" F/�e�r.,�.® , I.ATE ~%s��.,• �� /2/7 / . 11/ 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Z}--{ I I'Elc� DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: Novem* 1 f} 87_,._: EFC - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Land Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors—office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1) a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq_ ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2) a D,pecial permit for fill and grade to L tO. pgevelo47 4 00pCub c,yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly_idest of S ri pok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172.500 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water _ 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation / 15) Public Services `✓/ 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 101111. 1111" We have reviewed thi lication with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in a ha e identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informs cn is ded to properly assess this proposal. C - /0'./ fr /672 Signature of irector or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENT* BUILDING & ZONING DEPA1MENT DEVELOPMENT APPUUC TI iiN { REVIEW -SHET .. ., ECF - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 .cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION : Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek. TO: LI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 ® ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : Ed UTILITIES ENG., DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Ei POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE. PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON Novcm►bPr 1 9,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : [ 47/_.1Ty1 4i1/4-114//c4E,,EzlNCo ri APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 11 NOT A• '•.* ' I 10 1114 [UTILITY APPROVAL S1""' , i� � �' LATE COMERS AGREE:: A)# TEr A/0 _ LATE COMERS AGREEc::, sgwoe Az. SYSTEM DEVELOPMEIIT C . ()Wm' _ . d.G24/SQ.FT st 6-8e.), ?SCoa 4.23,a 38.5-V SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT L..._.; . SEIJet y, s 40. D¢/// /' // = `a3, c: .3 S`. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA(�::'.::, a tsi:i'i SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA C i:; T -SEVa No APPROVED WATER PLAN y,,Es rd APIleveo .S ✓6,0g (6-416,&1054_. l4 fAPPRAPPROVED SEWER PLAN OYED FIRE HYO• .;- OCATIONS D BY FIR !EFT. YtE' J, FIRE FLEW ANALY.IS s ': 1J. 1. DATE: /' / 74r /e7 SIGNATURE OF D` RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1•\\ REVISION 5/1982 J Form 182 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C .otryn DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: November 19,1987 EFC - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors. . Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of i1 a Site Pl r Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 14.8(000 sq ft warehouse with a 24,500 sa ft office mezzanine 2) a �8 cg ial �erm�'t or_ fi'11_ and ar_adP to abitit1apRevelo47 4 00permit,yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial Located on the north side of S GV 7t Stre _t at the 800 block and_ d_irec y_west of Sriieok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172,500 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • Sit, 5/INN I)L, `3 0,Ely i tyk ( t? vt i i 2 ,HO tJ L-L Av I R,of l(.. S`' S Y rv- 13� 1DC C(tP c(.11 W 1 1-14"/ sv C�R- 40 . vJ 10 LA) t._,its L t Fcc_ IZ E S LIL,u t NL-J6)N G l}� �/v 7 51 OE OF S'p t I nJ(o63RG 1( c›cuce--- Z 10ry C tA,D , pNss p,--/(0yJA-1, � ► ��, �', s I+'v�, pIC.Nt i t✓v _r �pL \ K)e, av\NoUe pLNv-i(EiN) PeRS PL Io `To 'if\1` , II ) W 1 I - - 1 is ci \loirot.ih We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. „ Signature of Direcit r or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENTON -WILDING & ZONING DEP,- -WENT DEVELOP ENT APPLICAllikth REVIEW SHEET ECF - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft' warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill-and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION : Located on the north side of S.W: 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek. TO : fl PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 ® ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT r BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ® OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON Nor nher 19,1987 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; -7)04)I U Jj APPROVED IAAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED fV ALiPcC 1_,)01\.)00113 \ LiZ .TES /sclDrJ Co S. ,/, Z.lr.:f 5 i rc-6.1 w' p I-1 L PSG 2css lu45 s G/ S, R ATIA1Z �PI rJ 51 CIO r s TO i sou sP811,i4-f 6 f pp[-c J kji=NO UL, P6Z,Old ��--� 77r, V���� DATE SIGNATURE OF p37PECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL, ' CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P��Lr &- DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, l R 7 COMMENTS DUE: November 19,1987 EFC - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : sA-071-87. SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors, .Office/Distri'bution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1) a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a. 148,000 sq. ft warehnise with a 24,500 sct ft office mezzanine• d grade to LdaftbaPREaclogLIFA'Ym b c•yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines substantial Located on the north side of S W 7 yj est of S ri Qok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172.900 sa_ ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use " \ 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation ?� 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: There are four (4) main issues that need to be addressed by the proposed development. The most important issue is the City's Springbrook Trail System. Lesser, but never- theless important issues, are the development of the City's Wetland Park directly south of the site, a small scale onsite active recreation facility and finally, the requested reduction in parking. The City's Springbrook Trail System is the main north/south pedestrian and bicycle separated right-of-way trail for the Valley. Construction of a section of this trail system would be the most important offsite mitigation measure the project proponent . could undertake. This project should develop a site plan that takes full advantage of the trail to the east and the proposed Wetland Park to the south. The applicant has already proposed to install a shower facility, which could be compli- mented by an onsite active recreation facility, such as a workout room, a half court basketball area or a tennis practice backboard. Finally, the applicant could presumably address the above issues more effectively if ` the parking requirements were reduced. However, even if the applicant does not see it in those trade off terms, it is still a reasonable request, which this department supports. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inf mat' needed to properly assess this proposal. _1.0e07 Signatur of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RE 3TP!" BUILDING & ZONING DE{PP"I EHT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval Of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Develooment permit. LOCATION : C Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek. TO: [=1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 II ENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION LI FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT . ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ,. POLICE DEPARTMENT LI POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ® OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE. PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON NoVembEr 19,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : A' ,ee,c,e .7z%oh JJ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED The applicant needs to address off-site park and recreation mitigation issues the most important of which is the Springbrook Trail. On-site mitigation should be expanded to include a small scale area for active recreation activities. Aesthetic considerations should lead the applicant to develop a site plan and building design that will relate visually and physically to the proposed public space adjacent to it. •SIGNATU OF DIRECTOR R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / / REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p..&44‘00,1N DATE CIRCULATED: November 9, 1987 " COMMENTS DUE: Nover,_19,7}98�7p EFC - 060 - 87 r i' [. t 11 . APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-071-87. SM-012.-87 1� - PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller Ass: iatesl d '�, ° �� Fri k PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors. . Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Alications for axz�ov 1 of 11 a S;te Pla„ fir Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148. 000 sq_ ft warehcrose - with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzani'nev• 2) a pecial permit for fill and grade to Lddiff0PREglogd120pgubf .yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines substantial Located on the north side of S.W. 27th .$tr'eet at the 800 block and dirertly est of S ri Lb pok Creek. 13.3 Acres. BUILDING AREA (gross): 172. 00 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water tl 4) Plants 5) Animals • 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) • Housing l/ 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional infor ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. • .� ����� 7V-2 3 i7 Signat of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENT^M BUILDING & ZONING DEPP"MENT DEVELOPMENT! APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 060 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase T of a complex to allow the construction of 'a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION : Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek. TO : ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ' SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 [=1 ENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG, DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT RBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT 1=1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT flOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE• PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON November 7 9,19A7 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Y fl APPROVED DI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS E NOT APPROVED • e ‘P /5 2Alrn 61z- DATE: //z SIGNATURE OF r. RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2149N El____ZONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE, 11 7m REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: e5Arn(t'1P.renY j ' DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 19R7 COMMENTS -DUE: Novembeg19;,1987" EFC - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors-Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1 ) a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2) a especial permit for fill and grade to L O PRevelopmg00pC b c.yards. of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines substantial ' Located on the north side of S,W, 27th Street at the 800 block and directly�est of Sribpok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172,500 scta ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health +� 8) Land and Shoreline Use ►� 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation ✓ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities '/./ COMMENTS: • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info mation is needed to properly assess this proposal. ////,3/87 Signet o Directs or Authorized Representative Date • • Form 4 RENTrilm BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATOON REVIE " SHEET ECF - 060 • - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of 'a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION : Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek. . TO: El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ' • . SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 2 ENGINEERING DIVISION flTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT LI BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ii:ii OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON November 19,19i97 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ® APPROVED APPROVED W H CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED o-�-- Ste✓ z 7�'„S /Cc S ✓. �� '� ( • y) v( a � f r i /2/67 DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 C1TY OF RENTON r . 2149N E RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE ) 1-� grilIVINM. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C) i DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 19R7 COMMENTS DUE: Nove r ,� EFC - 060 - 87 U NOV 5 1987 . APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) illi l5 E I E PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors. . Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1) a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq_ ft warehrm. e with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine, 2) a _ppecial_a-rmi't for fill and grade to aiatiollemiA4R0aubivards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial Located on the north side of S y_Idest of i '�.gok Creek. } SI 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172,900 sq_ ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 1 2) Air ✓ 3) Water • Z 4) Plants 5) Animals ✓ 6) Energy and Natural Resources ✓ 7) Environmental Health ✓ 8) Land and Shoreline Use 5 ) 1 9) Housing ✓ 10) Aesthetics 4 3) - 11) Light and Glare ✓ 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ✓ 14) Transportation �I 15) Public Services ✓ 16) Utilities ✓ COMMENTS: 1 . *AAA.. w, 1 hlw at. 9S of- 2 . UMAk bc- +a prot l- =1=7% Gre-ar. frrwl .4-441 lowevildet..A4 euuel44.3% AntAtt v i1 MP r-ei e.e.= w.tA. `rc wAut_ L41.44.44.744-trAutttr t wr,v . 1Of.dp Ht 14,4,E 194enr).°47414. "Lel 1°4-41-141 -t .t ►x V-e AA4e. t. 1 .r_. of- -1-k.e -�— We hav reviewed this application ALA particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signatur: of Director o:, Authoriz-d Raprbsentative Date • . Form 4 c4‘111E-NJ 11 ? 1 , 41ti • 1;--1• 14 }-i ';0D1 it.hrisi !) z ! It*. RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT ! APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, sM-o12-87 PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval df 1)a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a.148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION : Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek. TO: ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 ® ENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : LI UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ®BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ® POLICE DEPARTMENT ,• POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ® OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON Nor inhpr 19,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : El APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED kitAte 6k art-MIA*, f DATE; ' f IS I1GNATURE F DIRECTORIfr*1 UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 e - C 7�d 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET FI � , !1 .'I H 11 :: li REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Tire , 4 „19a.16-','= f! DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: November' 19,'1987v EFC - 060 - 87 �F . n.::a'a,;:.,.., APPLICATION NO(S). : sA-071-87, sip-o12_87 d 7, 1-`.1, F5 F \1,7 i 3 ,1 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mu]ler & Assoc tat esl' 4 �''(,CisLI&�eee pry ,..,ii p:FU• 2�1 •J , PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors. . Office/Distribution Center ' • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Apgl,ications for approval of l ) a site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq_ ft warehrnise with a 24,500 sQ ft office mezzanine• 2) a fip is perm;' for fill ana rr ada to L Okp evelopment0pCubic.yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines substantial ' Located on the north side27th Street at the 800 black and d;rectly....ldzest of Srikpok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172,500 sq ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth /. 2) Air r✓ 3) Water L.__- 4) Plants _ v _ _ _ . _ _ 5) Animals L- - 6) Energy and Natural Resources C.— .77 ,.F F-4:1N7701kil 7) Environmental Healthy �} Di. 9) Land and Shoreline Use " " VD 1.91997 91 9) Housing y' 10) Aesthetics �---- BuiL' `•W I Loi'rtil`3�� PT. 11) Light and Glare ' _ - 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation _ 2.------ 14) Transportation " x :tiir ' 15) Public Services �'' 16) Utilities ` ,,� { COMMENTS: i SSa 51,.,.;E,LAd- 4 V Tr,,,`;`o,a Y 1�a-4- LoLI ge_ , -e i , 1 j! S ry i c.)7f ,--- / e.707' U(1il-p- 14uvse 14 ) 7 b c'n?' !/, ‘ ' yI`'7 .7 ( c�.b, 042 y_ ----- -- Al • - / f ,' -,T L. I /L i,yv4/f-`' c� J f a ,g 70 r �: C 7 Z.e /6-q( '2�/(.t_0-e, ) i - ' %•. /Sse.� ,_ t"I—J - '- ,(4 , , . < i/,-;`- -((: d GI t o i s "1,J 7_'2..,c- 1'cLt e e -1-11.Ana , cJ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. (_•>-/-.4-7.--:, -)-9 zr (1-1- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ! ' I II 5(-a !i Z,-t'L o v.1 S t_.� �/C"J'� 'i)•Y�-,?if J ci.t. d /m n �o S L- . /44,-�% /:-) 6. rL"�t -���' .aid Form 4 2,cl t 71 in LLi7/0' e T f2Ya,,,spov I2///!, 4 a 1.1 c.`'7';4 /7 -5 1r,/ �. c r' <s !':.';,-,%` . RE 1TC ` BUILDING & ZONING DEPAi `"". °'ENT REVEL*PMENT PPUUCATION ` iE L49E °{ f SHEET ECF - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION : Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek. TO: ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 El ENGINEERING DIVISION RTRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION fl FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 111 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE. PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON November 1 9,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : T CA FF(c. F_tti1.G I L -J K El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED 1 ti /D A S S e., ScS 1'h f I lrc?S r cp le- `I%l a�j cLJ G�• , c: j") //1� i�(rl r .3D`� --- 1.7 ? 1, /17 1 -723 J 9 s �_ tag,3 se �S `',�?€>^ 4, 2-` �' 7 f L/O) l y 7, e pa-id A v:a, FL,g-r t..r `.a 5S:!.�.C:__� ( :3r "1.1 I ,l_r {Je: 'L)) ;:.• -p a7: /•;1) `P /_I Q/ rj� ' Ut ) '- v) r✓fir. '_ r C_) S r "t^C i S .) -0 5 DATE: ALP cJ, ) ) , SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUYHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE /1eP �;4�, ,✓�' ,-7 �.`� 7`) Tires 5 poV�dfio`-, ig e �,-21- ��sJ/- -�' ‘ c4:ev5 11E$ION 5/1982 Form 182 r `,,I! [7 ry,� 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEEIW.- L' t i t' fed REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: q/� eir �� E' 01 a�4�� DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE:I November 19,1987 EFC - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-o71-s7; sM-012-$7 . PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) • PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors. Office/Distribution Center • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval. of 1 ) a Site Plan fQx__ Phase I of a complex to allow the construr, ion of a 148d00fl s=_ ft warehol,se with a 24,500' sg ft office mezzanine° 2) a ecia pe ft for fi11 and rg adP to LdaftiAPREMAMLIV0peub c.yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial Located on the north sid_of S W 27th Street at the sc10 h1n -k and directl _.uest of S ri pok Creek. 13.3 Acres. BUILDING AREA (gross): 172, nn ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health B) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • Nv'e /ut_ 4s cs Uoea. � r�tICC (o re_e- crow4c y ) J -L) "4-��1 1. 1 eo c - -YAP,,d v 0-4 • • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we -have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. t Signature of D° ector or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 t, RENT^" BUILDING & ZONING DEPA DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF 060 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT' TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION : Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek. TO: El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : flUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1:1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT LI POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT r1OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE. PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 e 00 P.M. ON NoVemhPr 19,19A7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : oie_ APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ® NOT APPROVED � �✓ /Grt�--�77 DATE: 77 7 87 SIGNATURE OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 Mikn'O •'9 't 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE ' i � 3' !' \'' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P("eMerN4 Nr\ , � DATE CIRCULATED: November S, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: Novemb19,1987 EFC - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1 ) a S;te Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 1 48,00n sq_ ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine. 2) a Drpecial permit for fill and grade to L tillp'nrox 47,400 Cub c,yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly_west of S ri Qok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 1.72.900 sq_ ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation •_ 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da Form 4 - • RENTS--- BUILDING & ZONING DEN - MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 060 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill' and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek. TO: ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 LI ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : LI UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT [' OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE. PROVIDE COMMENTS TO. THE BUILDING. & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON • Novsab r 9 t987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI ON : El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Ei NOT APPROVED .�. S-Soo �n o oz � -4-, & 7/ ' :24744.(4;c/- _.,64;iKe0 .-17/-eAcs feej,,reA6'', -,);_fiZ42-7/ a-free/ DATE: j)u.• G, / ,7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 LANCE MUELLER LL, TUT OF UQLaummonrQEL ASSOCIATES/ARCHITEC1 5- 130 Lakeside Suite 250 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 DATE JOB NO. (206) 325-2553 ATTE TION A RE: !� TO i of o�% ,�/�� � TJl . - , ____, .%., 0 ' -,_,___. -77 ;-i \' 77 , .=, 11 dl .. £'",,at 9i r-::'f`: 7t 'i r'.'r: sli-P�B. ... .11, LI WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: — ❑ Shop drawings 0 Prints ❑ Plans -� Sampl s 0 Specifications CI Copy of letter 0 Change order ) , ,,S' p. COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval El For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution IX As requested ❑ Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints / For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US i REMARKS COPY TO (� SIGNED: PRODUCT 240-2 (es/Inc,Groton,Mass.olait. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. / 11 LANCE MUELLER } Lairug OF linkmen oirum ASSOCIATES/ARCHITEC... . 130 Lakeside Suite 250 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 oAT NO. 87 (206) 325-2553 ATTEN .ON 6` � Ad i 2.) / RE: I % GL i �//l±TO . l WE ARE SENDING YOU D Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order 0 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION Ie• &y$cd' j — A I, G I, ewie., 6 Do ' &-,c de e Gar- --e 4 3 ,Dege-et,/d'b-A074 6-, 7 .7.4.,e 74- 1 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution — 0 As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints • For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Vit(f2 2 / r&/./e kW -7 'e Aied -531:W.5" ‘1A.%/1?-04/...:L 3C6"74..‘-- Ze.. t r ,641 s �- ----- s i U arezagia-4 l/0 /-iti. ,4i cex * Ai * __17,e.."ell / it'd/ zratl' 19.4, • * — Q,o -/ 71-- 0.‘44..., . 1 COPY TO Pd-- . _ SIGNED: PRODUCT 240-2 /rVEsJ ice.,crown,Mass.01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. J lance mueller & associates architects October 22, 1987 CITY OF RENTON Building & Zoning Dept. 200 Mill Avenue So. Renton, Washington 98055 Re: ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS Dear Sir: Alaska Distributors is an office/warehouse distribution facility designed for the distribution of merchandise to Alaska via truck. The project is two phased - phase 1 is the south portion of the site including the new proposed structure with surrounding parking and truck maneuvering. Phase 1 consists. of 148,000 s.f. warehouse with 24,500 s.f. office mezzanine. Future development will include another 140,000 s.f. of warehouse and 24,000 s.f. of office mezzanine. The building is constructed of tilt-up concrete panels, dryvit over-hang above truck loading doors and insulated tinted exterior glazing. All concrete and dryvit to be painted in warm earth tones. Phase 2 is the north portion of the site where future expansion is to occur. For the present, the site will be filled to parking lot elevation as shown on civil drawings. Phase 2 should be under separate permit from phase 1 , but run concurrently. The site plan will feature significant landscaping and parking for 229 cars (owner wishes to reduce this to 115) . If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sine = SOCIATES/ARCHITECTS r ri Patrick Kerr r PK:nk OCTO CU I NG/ZONING DEPT. 130 lakeside• suite 250 • Seattle,washington 95122[2061325-2553 lance mueller aia,eel•senior associates:robert olschewsky,eileen furney associates:robert fadden,michael galbraith,richard harnish,robert wells a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by and under the supervision of registered architects PC P5.001 NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING , DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 148,000 SQ. FT. WAREHOUSE WITH A 24,500 SQ. FT. OFFICE MEZZANINE AND SUB- STANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITHIN 200 FT. OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. ; ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS FILES: SA-071-87, SM-012-87 GENERAL LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 27TH STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK AND DIRECTLY WEST OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. • PUBLIC APPROVALS: 1. SITE APPROVAL • 2. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT 3. BUILDING PERMIT The application can be reviewed at the Bulding and Zoning Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2540. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. Ronald G. Nelson Building & Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I J ER eI F. L.1 r.1D HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1i4iie,6 COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME ON SEPlEMf5ElZ 3 ,19 81 ,IN -(HKEe, CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEAR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in AL'',E4-1 , on the yth day of ,('C�%E' J i3&-2 )M L�c� SIGNED: .W✓1(J� • ±' CITY OF RENTON ogIL ammo w _ BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director August 11, 1987 William S. Tsao 2201 6th Avenue Suite 1008 Seattle, WA 98121 Subject: Michael R. Mastro Lot Line Adjustment, S.W. 27th Street Dear Mr. Tsao: The Renton Building and Zoning Department is in receipt of the above referenced application for a lot line adjustment between two lots. We understand that this is desired to allow the firm of Alaska Distributors to locate a new building along the eastern side of the property. As the adjustment you desire involves shifting the common line between Lots 1 and 2 a full 90°, this cannot be construed as a minor adjustment under the City's lot line adjustment procedure. This is a major reconfiguration of the lots. The method for a major readjustment of property lines is to have the property replatted through a short plat process. This method does require more time and is costlier, but can be done concurrently with the pending site plan approval application we have with Alaska Distributors. We are therefore returning to you, your lot line adjustment application and check in the amount of $100. 00. If you wish to pursue this matter through the short plat procedure, please let us know so that we may assist you with the proper forms and steps in accomplishing the replat. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact either myself or Jerry Lind of this office. 4401 Do . rickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:JFL:csb:dskl LtTsao Enclosure 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 • •�. '1,480 CITY OF RENTON gams BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director August 11, 1987 William S. Tsao 2201 6th Avenue Suite 1008 Seattle, WA 98121 Subject: Michael R. Mastro Lot Line Adjustment, S.W. 27th Street Dear Mr. Tsao: The Renton Building and Zoning Department is in receipt of the above referenced application for a lot line adjustment between two lots. We understand that this is desired to allow the firm of Alaska Distributors to locate a new building along the eastern side of the property. As the adjustment you desire involves shifting the common line between - Lots 1 and 2 a full 90°, this cannot be construed as a minor adjustment under the City°s lot line adjustment procedure. This is a major reconfiguration of the lots. The method for a major readjustment of property lines is to have the property replatted through a short plat process. This method does require more time and is costlier, but can be done concurrently with the pending site plan approval application we have with Alaska Distributors. We are therefore returning to you, your lot line adjustment application and check in the amount of $100. 00. If you wish to pursue this matter through the short plat procedure, please let us know so that we may assist you with the proper forms and steps in accomplishing the replat. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact either myself or Jerry Lind of this office. Do rickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:JFL:csb:dskl LtTsao Enclosure . 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 —— — as , A 36 z L' se 31 �� i 1 z c'- - I e - I �o II �M NO. 4�, - - - �.W. 1t TH I 1 SY I -- 3 2 1 0r34-:Sr . ai 1 6 - —5 - - 4 \ G-, ° u Q J 41 7 1 Q .} ,E.a1s tle r — 2 Ig 11 — - �1 I I - i. 1 P . . Iijs — -LL � • ___ — au).. G�14 D 51 77SobJ€C1' 3' ,I,1It oI 1 I3 �t j, w � =� 1 I . Ski 7 _‘ I e S.W. 27 77-1 `.2)-7: 0 t1 G ®I I I I 1 r 1 . • IZ II 1: 10 I 1 2 I 1 \ •r di SII I I I u , 1 I II I I 7 8O9 z + ; ; I d i- '— ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS (LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES) . SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-071-87 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM-012-87 APPLICANT LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES • TOTAL AREA 13.3 ACRES ' PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 27th STREET. EXISTING ZONING M-P (MANUFACTURING PARK) ' EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED 'PROPOSED USE WAREHOUSE' AND OFFICE USE . - COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION COMMENTS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 27th STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK AND DIRECTLY WEST OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THE APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE A SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL. . i ' \ f-.1 . 9 4O +'^ NO. 46• , �W 1 lam •I -II , �i 1 l 1 01 —4 1 I 61 J i• ® l7 Ih -- ,- --=L ,e1 i tp __-LC w —�" alai r-- t 1 —N 111 y J 3- �I 9�f 11 ,at . 1 s rid i ,A 7 . 1, o .6 ', 1 ,p A , j, A4 5/ere a , /A ' QI /l+ ,1 i .+` F r 2 3.115,2,_ ___s_f_.,-,,.,,,,,I.,4 0 4 , , \ �FM>Mu ---2-T TM J f. I I + I © ` P I i Iz II to It5 '?9r#i sr , a n/ I I , I II I 7 8 9 z I I I I I I i + II ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS (LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES) SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-071-87 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM-012-87 APPLICANT LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA 13.3 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 27th STREET. ' EXISTING ZONING M—P (MANUFACTURING PARK) EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE WAREHOUSE AND. OFFICE USE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION COMMENTS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 27th STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK AND DIRECTLY WEST OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THE APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE A SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL. 4 Al t s4-- — —GIs'" C L I — .G PLANT SCHEDULE te: 1 f, '' I %., \_ >i. pl.q,lus fcEwrwa/La;no0 w1sJlE 2."CeL. ;n o m .. - -. - 7= :I —\ a en FiEUGbT54E}.-Ifalxslyl/U%44•s pIR C'-6' o ; �'9 • u :1 — © rw 15ucy.NElera MYU->/LIE aI1 -11acx C•e' v ``� 40' d .I 1 = o •D, pbpuLus rr..1-(u..N,c-,a:/�Hew+.�'po o'-Io G i' ?,r,1 :I 1 O �_ - I �.,` _• ; :s O 61 .CPA UPrullalu,•I/vnlE W.PLe 6'-9 9-I .WN• Ia1 1 '� —j op •r. yD 54oNyH,Le A....1••/2Dwl1Ny E 44 15'-le' ��1 I b 40 am 61 pHanNlw .A.5m/1'Nof 4L s Cy.a. nu<+lT FBhre BLAIdslp Expansion,., I • _ = i? Rxa 46 AC6Llq c}ti.1 JIpLG /Ate-v s CAN. in r1. — — �� .. Lard.-15 5TEa 11.cuF..�" -I'POTS .50'o.c. a �. 1 — -\�Q \,:1:': p Eeen. Nru ' W wTTLEyy , q'MIS al.o.c. Ijl 1 __ — Wppl&1vY C1 _ •• • a Gam. AI I ;, I —a NOTES Cr ml I - 4od4ecr. me.rt-r .v".c RIOT I QI - e aw u-(vauh aurora—zee.).coo." eaw/ \ - ytaii3O•-;me cahiauous utiP-.R-ivaF} _ w.c rtxnny ancci.i.- " '. - —\ - IL., o w a s as o+a. (xt eera..l —IP.15, - caw-cps r•o.r-+r .S. eu y.n N ..r LAW,.Nun1r. Ir. - •,uu y �:� .....r.2...�t...4. CO) _`' - ALL 1..No3,-Ars..R , RF •s .WTcw.iic lv.Gp no.l. CC a ID G -9.4 ZZ b' ` 0© O - ycs (A (n _,00Ei l it —,»,®' rYW-wrN Lw.411.4• a 1s1 —,s 44) un-1 eWp P.M.04511.C, %/ fib lik `�'C'��R --owo w 1 4ZEb bfCG•-.1PE $. CO ... g jj \'. au lazy-04, •h'+N67 b.7i f� eww 1•WaC•fiiWr b•APplo+r N 1I, — ; it eer. P awH rxotavl pp =,••0 (Y••= trpw + ) Q m I b 0® I P'+w++�i war w a 5,111.1. 1 m 11 •p rnu.« • watrva. '® - •:pp raxw+ixen0lrox go- ;w,aN.rPLLrwtUP4- V. — �u „f ry=.1.11 ;hu^a*OpWtY al _—.\ 0 I ao 7. r- '{" {�7r yy .oCri'( L'l ;p @pc:IF:, o „up rtrCrmn.ynr,Ce - —1� Awr:,�r:`t'EK E.. 1F�t STAKING&PLANTING DETAL. ..... ID 03 p peanp • .?i} _ TREE IN PLANTER BED . ..:.w I 7•" 1 :' I I I leii 'IIIIJ ( _III �'r1III !! ' � ! :pl • Ik. s�e:1•-ao' `� ®p S.J 27th STREET �-FLut e• co•.la1.l •q.r-Lr ® .,... EARTH ENTERPRISES L-1 • vmmenin...yr GENERAL NOTES -- ' ..7.17:n V.:2".Lt..".11,1rX:,',.f.V.T..":.=..°,7;•:,,; ....,.,. 1 . . '..3 !1 1 2. .11 ut11100 to 0•pot or abls Eat., ----__.-_. ;•1 .y.----.--,--_. -_- . i.IA..0*.I.prra'no 1! ,•-•, ,_ ____--- -—___ ananana up an.---------- •'-----------------.1 L--- ' • r-1 • e............,..r.,....“..,. ‘,.,:,...”....... L L , to 0 •L'olTse:.=orr"'""""""*. C"""."""r.t"""""""""'""' It.LI Bite....taaor.s.a..tadv,s‘brY,.......,,.....,•••,... '74• ino..,••looir•Ca..1.0*to to 0.•.0...a ..i., i. i,., 1 . . i •, . In.1.a,..r.:.:!,'..•ruia............1.....er.........ansaa nem, g ',a. •••'-= ‘•'_...= P an.a.eatat.na...n.no ma.0.a nas apern..1. Il a 1",-00_020,02i2,6•00.04,101_ - . - 1 • - . 91_ 9 4 ....,.ta.,a•0.0 0.00. .- : • Ui g oz. . _ a 0 0 _?.I — — -. ,•.1:',.-c:'•----------'="7:Jr,7,71;%:•••,., for 210.3 n < ... . 111 ...5 .,a .=A ,-,-,_ 11t1t --)-- '--- . Lou z - . 0 c,4 — — 1 ; • . .- t I -0- 7 .i....7. Z, 4 - a 0 si ,,......,-...,.,.......-.. MAP 7,..:.;.1:4:7:::::,441; ti,,,,z,rigg45:_i,x,.:i...-.• ,ii,....,,44:),11,.."' g = VICINITY N .., sn , a I • -- : - •••',.., ._ • f tO..-Lt 1 cc . i : N •I s- _ '• ., r•NY N • •••• ..Jle,'%1RiFIK {Mk 1?)--." qtY•li .. q 3IT'S • eLno,_t-r... . —...% h*.'''' 1 1- . - , - L -• -*_I'-i4 . : t \1--•• 63 ri.,.., ............w• C.% 1 __-: ---1 ________-It_ _ '• -,7-• a *,,,E.Fal —I •-..'i '--- '"^' .1..-$'':'-'' /. .,,, i .1''" qh........-:-*:stk—. --- q u) . ../en• 19 Z 1 .Z. - -- __ -. '‘.4::•?..1.,•.Yr•••• 1—, -r-' . .- -.. , 1 I$ 04;„1'4. MIMIC ••°00 -I-- ' . ,._-.4 ..... ,1 1., 1 i ..:,: a 1-3. ,. 7 _ — ___ : -i= • -4----' LEGAL DESCRIPTION i: I-- • i 7- rut rm..as tee ann...a.•aaea ea a.......n,....,••••••.••a :7=2Z:•=12attai::::."".''"""'..'"."." CZI IP, t 1 —...1.4 da•e' pi... ..,b•b• ,,. „•_, [ca.et Om 000.1 son.of 01.1200.1 '. •4 , .ea 0000.00,•11••0.11•I to ••••00.22,... . 1 ' •,! • ' ••..0.=a14.re•I•lart I.1.1.0.1.080 G.lil•C I .1, . •- , _1 III 111,11 1111 ..,. 111 III 1 ill 1 :'..:T,T , , ititItIbl.), -, . ... —.....-7.init7:51'.11.:F.E'.11'i'7:::**".:Tt."-.--"..:',"1.1.1. -').3g i 3 r_01-19 ,•.i -- 1 9.9•..1.9 4..; .r,;_a_4_, .i.,...4,...4...4_ 3•,-; : • Z i •,, ,.. . ., ,,,../ 0.,•_•_",__11 ... ••.-,•..:. ,:j ,,,,,,i,....... "--.2::::::';::,111,t.---,::17 r,2".V.:7:1:::." E5 : ._ __• - .. •... . • .,L"ki 1,Liii!wo_H.J. I ;I! u.1111W L11:11,11111 . ,. .....—..........HO••••I 20 GA-- Zra•""lart!'0'..1::!::•::1:r0":%"17:•".1"Vrrol:::•VIr-P"Lot •Gl 5 CI5 . el 1 T ..r1:-.11.";1•.•...''''... 1 .7. IF.E.••••.010 of.100. _l C , "_;.‘'4.1.I. "". • ____....'_'.__...,_or,.'.o'.r.4.,.1.'„rx,.../.,......."....rz. ..,.,.."....,..,.”......, --,".,9..,t-..7"-'"--"----______ .1,.1... "••.••••T:;%....„1.0.1101.101.00 02016 be...rb••e tt•0. aL1--,- - [:M.L.L0 0:.0:. 1 m.or.. ge . b S‘ 27th STREET , e..IV.c0I11. rP.,---,.. x..... „„...-....... ,-'" 0 ---, 1 • I -r- 9 I1 ICI, // 1 1 t — -a 1 0 :1 1 i i fro „. I: t • n CA '— 0 9a d,// k l r-0 r a PO d T I, e a ra 1 `\ --ea:: ) I r .- 1 -a 00 \ / \ -° '-'1 ,-- �R1, s Pxm I � 1 - DO .� I sI` / I'1, 0 I 1, 11 _�.... ,. \ __ I ' Io-- -i11I1Q�I;11� --Q——10•• i P 4. /'i,(1.__) gr-_.ail s r z . " 6 0 V. o f ' E-T�--Iii f mm-L, ' II - o i a` r 'ry f,. Fl rf4 Aa ////�� 0 �• i I •: LI sdw,,,T•C 61ae01"6 4 � r•-.iY PLUM ��. _ g' 4 ( > a 6.P. o i s i .i our'e s : BUSH,ROED&HITCHINGS,INC. 1�p°4' — clvacnmrieeass LAND Surrvirar+s SEAL • �w $' "� Re .'",WawsN6r6" BRH «•n.„„ OF R4. U,„ 0 q7 SEP�Euxe OF PENDING -SITE LAN At ,:.! - PLICATION ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS FILE #: SA-071-87 & SM-012-87 DESCRI ' LION : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 148, 000 SQ. FT. WAREHOUSE WITH A 24,500 SQ. F. OFFICE MEZZANINE & SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT MEZZANINE & SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPEMNT WITHIN 200 FEET OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. GENERAL LOCAT AN "./OR ADDRESS: ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 27TH STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK AND DIRECTLY WEST OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. S PUBLIC APPRIVALS REQ . ! RED : 1. SITE APPROVAL 2. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT 3, BUILDING PERMIT . PUBLIC COMMENTS .WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING . ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND }'I URING PUBLIC HEARINGS, FOR FURTHER 'INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION i ti�Y. o `"ITY OF RENTC"T FILE NO(S): AVO7 ` -81 0 �;, ' " 6.,.LDING & ZONING DEPARTI..�NT ' `_, " �'8�- �.N�o MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I 1 TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME ��%i / �I FEES /6intee i7' a/(1`� ,A_s' G . Q REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS f3 - o `� � d/- 5/ /e _? - EJ SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY/ L ZIP RY PERMIT* S Qc 6 'I/? Z Q CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE Jffill SITE PLAN APPROVAL .lalP -P' 54 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL �5'� (V i6) g- ' `-s�3 No. of Cubic Yards:- A-DO CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE* . From Section: NAME * Justification Required ADDRESS r SUBDIVISIONS: 3 0 L(i 4e S l d 257) D SHORT PLAT CITY //A. ZIP ' Q TENTATIVE PLAT SC%C2 /( 9 f/7 Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 3 a .�- ass 3 . ED WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: 6/e, 19/5/(?v/,e ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: y�e 5),t4 ,, So' Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP ED FINAL sea_#/e f/�� P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE /�„ , - r 7 j// Residential Industrial C// l Commercial Q Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS / ,tI X 73 Q TENTATIVE EXISTING USE l� PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: at P-- 7/ 1�TZf r/ &n NUMBER OF SPACES: / Ifft ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 1 Z.+o9- SQ. FT. / ACRES '— "— }- - ~ AREA: 5 1 1 S / �. OTA`�I � S � S D/ R=. __ CITY O I;y 47(_,1. STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE STAMP Li L i I° i.. , ' APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: � `� APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: „L.2'i J8 ® Accepted CD Incomplete Notification Sent On' y: ' r.JG/ZONING DEPT. B(Initials) ' DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: Cc l a-25'f 1 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: S (MI aTli1 171 Accepted ® Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: ®Building t=1 Design Eng. Fire Q Parks 7t Police 12ELPolicy Dev. E Traffic Eng. fra] Utilities i. • REVISED 1-31-84 Legal description of property (if more space.is required, attach a separate sheet). .i • AFFIDAVIT tA-7-2(cic _ , being duly sworn, declare that I am 1:211.1thorized representative to act for the property owner,Mowner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS ��—lI DAY OF dtx 19 ,4 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE S ATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT • ,I (Na of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) Q-5( w0 -tr- • (Address) ! (Address) (City) „ , (State) (Zip) (xc) 3P;S" _�S�S 3 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Foxm #174 That portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. in King County, State of Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Section; Thence south along the east line of said Section a distance of 180.01 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to and 180 feet southerly, measured at right angles to the north line of said Section; Thence westerly, parallel with the north line of said Section 20 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to and 20 feet westerly, measured at right angles to the east line of said Section, and the true point of beginning; Thence southerly 1074.37 feet along said line parallel to and 20 feet westerly measured at right angles to the east line of said Section; Thence north 88°24'48" west 560 feet; Thence northerly, parallel to the east line of said Section, 1095.48 feet more or less to the intersection with a line which runs north 87°12'59" west from the true point of beginning; Thence easterly, parallel with the north line of said Section, to the true point of beginning. EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Renton for road purposes by deed recorded under Recording Number 8401240272. CITY OF RENTON 11111 D JUL 291987 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. lance mueller '& associates architects July 23, 1987 CITY OF RENTON Building & Zoning Dept. 200 Mill Avenue So. Renton, Washington 98055 Re: ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS Dear Sir: Alaska Distributors is an office warehouse/distribution facility designed for the distribution of merchandise to Alaska via truck. The project consists of 148,000 s.f. warehouse with 24,500 s.f. office mezzanine. Future development will include another 140,000 s.f. of warehouse and 24,000 s.f. of office mezzanine. The building is constructed of tilt-up concrete panels, dryvit over-hang above truck loading doors and insulated tinted exterior glazing. All concrete and dryvit to be painted in warm earth tones. The site plan will feature significant landscaping and parking for 285 cars. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. CL Siny N\ LANCE ,&ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS Patrick ICerr PK:nk 130 lakeside • suite 250 •seattle,washington 98122[208]325-2553 lance mueller ele,csi•senior assoclatee:robert olecheweky,eileen furney associates:robert Fadden,michael geibreith,richerd hernieh,robert wells a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by end under the supervision of registered architects LANCE MUELLER [L ETT OF MRSE ITITTIM ASSOCIATES/ARCHITEC.. S 130 Lakeside Suite 250 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 DATE JOB NO. (206) 325-2553 A N 17 : TO (-4 0 RE/rt���jj� eft srtexi 1VL S/,e( /oez WE ARE SENDING YOU D Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 5- .sue itialtel. Zek _ . _T_- CITY'OTR-is _ - ,ENTO�� -v 1 r) . ,N,?,,N,•.,, ,.... _, ,i-11---J-tiL-2-019974 Jut_3 0-1981 , . ENGINEERING P -CITY=OFREAT0N THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use 0 Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ® ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS <� i __.04f,t a6 -,/�-h1-1 Gei z4e,4e COPY TO 9,— SIGNED: 7 i PRODUCT 240-2 I �Inc,Groton,Rm.0147I If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE! ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS APPLICANT: LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES APPLICATION NUMBER: SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-071-87 The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER Adjoining to West Longprop Development 510 Rainier Ave. So. 252304-9064-04 Seattle, WA 98144 252304-9058-02 Adjoining to North Burlington Northern R.R. 2100 First Interstate Center 252304-9019-00 999 Third Ave. 252304-9001-00 Seattle, WA 98104 Adjoining to South (across street) City of Renton Renton City Clerk 252304-9076-00 Renton, WA 98055 Adjoining to East Mobile Oil Co. c/o Olympic Pipeline 302305-9084-02 612 So. Flower St. Los Angeles, CA 90017 Mobile Oil Co. Property Tax Division 302305-9086-00 P. 0. Box 290 Dallas, Texas 75221 CITY OF RENT071 i JUL291987 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER CERTIFICATION I, 76�-i�2ict T',c9, hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the Kin Count Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed,and sworn to be re me. a Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington residing at . on the ?5 day of CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I, ��fZ1'``( F.LtL)O . hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on At5(0, 77- 1987, to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington residing at F;AjTc,A) on the 2 7 o4. day of A-11/�t is I f q8-7 LQ__,2-LcA [ av SIGNED: tA/v►(k.- F ORM 2013 OF R4,+ EC F: lEf—n‘,D 1 °�1, �% ° Cityof Renton LU: s» o� -Bi © sP- 06Is -61 mill ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 0,9gre0 sEPTE. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this check�,ist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Alaska Distributors 2. Name of applicant: Lance Mueller & Associates/Architects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Pat Kerr 130 Lakeside, Suite 250 Seattle, WA 98122 (206) 325-2553 4. Date checklist prepared: July 23, 1987 5. Agency requesting checklist: Building & Zoning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): October 1 , 1987 begin building construction February 1 , 1988 occupancy CiTY of FiENTOJ1 'JUL 2 9100 D BUILDING/ZONING D .PT, fai7. Do you have any poor future additions, expansions, rther activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. Yes, site plan shows future expansion. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, drectly related to this proposal. N.A. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. N.A. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. N.A. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you Ito describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Natural earth tone color painted tilt-up/dryvit office/warehouse distribution facility. Ofifice. space has solar bronze insulated glass. Structural fill under slab with perimeter landscaping and general site improvements. 12. Location of title proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. See attached. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); a, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 2%0 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know Ithe classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sandy clays, silty clay and sandy gravel d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. - 2 - i e. Describe tht pose, type, and approximate qu ies of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Al/0 do 7 .566 /v/G Dut � � 'to//t6 4 tl= 7/vac compacted select fill pad) an�12I compact below°h `` a 'ing area. � J7 � /7 00y �l�i`St `3o,00a�fJ f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, oir use? If so, 7 generally describe. Temporary erosion control measures will be utilized to contain erosion completely on site. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? /o a7 72% of i°/tnSE 0,06 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Containment ditches, sedimentation pond(s) , and hay bail dams or other means as required to contain on site. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Normal equipment exhaust emissions during construction , as well as dust (rains should help mitigate) . Post construction vehicle exhaust emissions from normal car and truck traffic. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. ' 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Spring brook creek/ditch. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, site improvements and building construction. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Does not apply. C;TY OF RENT O'f \\T" 0CT221987 - 3 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 4) •.. Will .the prop 11 require surface water withdrav- or diversions? Give . _ general desca on, purpose, and approximately qu ties if known. No.: . 5) Does the proposal lie'within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan...: - No. 6) Does.the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. L b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, a,if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) . ; Describe the source . of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water. will .be collected by city approved on site detention system. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? .If so, generally describe. No. - 4 - d. Proposed res to reduce or control surfaced, and runoff water impacts, if any: See 3.c. 1 ) above 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ':X Shrubs a grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Shrubs and grasses over 95% of the site. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Do not know of any. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed landscape includes maples, pines, rhododendrons, azaleas, laurels, ivy, lawn and miscellaneous other local plant material indigenous to the area. A natural area to the east side of the site will 5. Animals remain undistrubed. a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Cc ty mamma I s Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other rro1TE b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Do not know. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Do not know. - 5 - d. Proposed Ales to preserve or enhance wildli,ny: Preservation of existing grasses plus addition of new plant material (see B.4.d. above) 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric or natural gas for heating, lighting manufacturing ventilation, etc. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included find*.: plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Comply with Washington State Energy Code. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: No. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Do not know. - 6 - r 2) What types.evals of noise would be created r associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction will generate typical construction noise. Operation of the plant will generate insignificant noise. Vehicle noise will include 30 passenger cars + /day at 8a.m. and 5 p.m. , 8 truck trips per day +. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vacant, undeveloped. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? M-P. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Manufacturing park. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not Applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 70 - 80 including truck drivers. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 75% + of the work force will come from the local area. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. - 7 - 1. Proposed reres to ensure the proposal is coble with existing and projected land uses and plans. if any:, Do not know 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any. would be eliminated? Indicate whether high. middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts. if any: None. 10. Aesthetics i a. What is the tallest height of anyii proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 28' - 0" above floor line; 32'' - 0" above grade at dock high doors; plus additional 3' + to roof ridge plus rooftop equipment. Exterior: painted smooth concrete & dryvit solar tint glass. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Architectural and landscape desilgn. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Office lighting will be visible at night through the window system. Site lighting will be provided by security wall pack lights on the side of the building during hours of darkness. b. Could light or glare from _the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No safety hazard. No views at night. 11 j� r, c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Existing street lights on both Lind Avenue and S.W. 27th Avenue. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Wall pack lights will be non-glare type. 12. Recreation ^ Y a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the • immediate vicinity? Interurban trail . b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Shower facility can accommodate individual workouts. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: • -Does not apply 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Entrance drives at south property lines will access S.W. 27th Street and Lind Avenue. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? No: 500 yards + to nearest stop. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Project provides 285 stalls; eliminates none. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. - 9 - e. Will the prW use (or occur in the immediateity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generallydescribe. p No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 50 - 60 cars coming in morning and leaving at night plus 5 trucks during the da and 20 trucks during the night. g. Proposed measures to reduce or contrortransportation impacts, if any: None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Police and fire protection - yes; emergency only. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any., None. ; 16. Utilities a. Circle; u ' '= curren ly a ailable lat the site: - tural gas q - -, telephone anitary sewer, septic sys em, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity - Puget Sound Power and Light Gas - Washington Natural Gas I water, refuse (PNB) , sanitary C. SIGNATURE I, th ersigned, sta - .•at to the best of my knowledge the above information is tr and conj plete. It is ••erstood that the lead agency may withdraw any de laration of non-sig ' icanc= at it might issue in reliance upon this checklist sho d there be a ti 1 ul mis •` en ation or willful lack of full disclosure on my pa Proponent: -�< <. ���A';� —maw ><- Name Printed: Pat Kerr it - 10 - { #176 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: November 19,1987 EFC - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1 ) a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq_ ft warehcnise with. a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine;'2) a Dpecial permit for fill and grade to L6E4ftbkiliaglogMLU0T2 b cc_yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial ' Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and direct1y_west of SISrigQok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172.500 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air • 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and .Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation • 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • Form 4 RENT' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of l)a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION : Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 OENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT fBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE' PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON November 19,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : DAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 l` Building & Zoning Department November 19, 1987 Page Two 3. Flood Plain Compensating Storage - Under our old, existing Flood Plain Policy begun by Dave Clemens, the previous Policy Development Director, and confirmed by the City Council , all filling below the 100-year flood plain must be compensated by digging out an equal volume below the 100- year flood plain. If this site is subject to a flood plain elevation of 16.5, all filling below must be dug out somewhere else. Public Works recommends digging out some portion of the P-1 Channel that is owned or controlled by the City. Phase II - New fill of 30,00 C.Y. - compensating storage must be dug out. Phase I - New fill of 17,650 C.Y. plus 11 ,100 C.Y. displaced by building plus 8,150 C.Y. moved from mound on site to fill low areas. 36,900 C.Y. compensating storage must be dug out. 66,900 C.Y. TOTAL. This is equivalent to digging 2580 L.F. of the P-1 Channel outfall section. Thankyou. 1D.7.20.REB:mf ---.</Gig i,,...419 / 0 k' )/ REQU I RCU FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS ) L a! `. ' ; 1I 1/ '‘, 'L—: •c% —7 & 19fil LL:—.J 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME /9/f9-s/17 �/s7- /wia.eS U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS s_ 2. a7 FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: /7,2 Sob FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: /7a,S 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): 4/ c3-21, GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: -- — IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B)PM (C) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) 6 , 6cro GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: 3 , Ur-,G GPM CE) CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAR. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 11 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH 76 ADD /0 % 30 20% MAX. EAST o2 Go ADD ) % 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH • 7o ADD /D % 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST 101 -150 a ' �o ADD �b %1 -1OR 4-HR WALL 50 MAX.� TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : /49 % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJ! TMENT: 3/c GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: �� GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) ' (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: 67:5 GPM (H) .1. SIGNED: -- `` -(3 ____ < 1 I ATE , ��- 4.. /P/% N 2149N ENV RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE1 I NT n REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Z1- i 1141 DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: Novemb 1 8 EFC - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : sA-071-87. SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors. Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1 ) a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 14f?.000 �cr_ ft warehouse with a 24,500 sa ft office mezzanine• 2) a pp cci_al hermit for fill and grade to L6 tb pgevelo47 4 00pCXb c.yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 0300 block and dirertly_west of SribApok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172.500 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water _ 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 1.7 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 110111611" We have reviewed thi lication with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in a rave identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informs cn is leilded to properly assess this proposal. it /87 Signature ofiDirector or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENTS BUILDING & ZONING DEPA•MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATII I . REVIEW SHEET ECF - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION : Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek. TO: [=11 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 ® ENGINEERING DIVISION ' flTRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : Et UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION E FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT fl .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ® POLICE DEPARTMENT ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LI OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED :' IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON Npremhpr 1 9,1 987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 0/7LITy >-NtC/L e1/1/4-1 ro Ei APPROVED flAPPROVED WITH ,CONDITIONS 11 NOT A' ' ''vD- 011( „.A.11 UTILITY APPROVAL VA SU i n 411F 0. - --' f LATE COMERS AGREEr AM-TE, ' WO LATE COMERS AGREE:, SE4)E*"2 NO SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT C:. 4.147E,e �/ gD.G24/50.�:X ,58o JsGd g' Z 3,a 38.',5-V SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT C:;..:.__. .___-.:SE )674. 'I ./ = $o23, .t3 si --� SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA ::'.::;..s-t`:,ti7 ! Ala iI g i/lo, T 7/m. 5/� SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA Ciii -SEWER ,/p APPROVED WATER PLAN N 'os ,�pxw� a ,y, 5,.. (ems dt{.ss 11.6✓r5io403 -) r �APPROVED SEWER PLAN S iZ-ig-f ,� /� APPROVED FIRE HYD NAMESn BY FIR EFT. YlEs I jV FIRE FLC 1 ANALY IS DATE: / / /'r /87 SIGNATURE OF D'aRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ` REVISION 5/1982 � Form 182 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Zn DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 19R7 COMMENTS DUE: November 19,1987 EFC - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : sA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center ' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1 ) a site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the canstruc i'�n of a l4F3 000_ s_ ft warahnuse with a 24,500 sa. ft. office mezzani7ie: to L F roPRE°ox 476n00pC b c.yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial Located on the north side of S.W. 27th St�Qf at the f3n0 hlerk and c3irPc-tly._west of S ri pok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172,900 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • Se.,,0:5-1/34'(( L `��flrti�+„Ir� 2-1'VI i S\ Iifirf ice&) l Lc LA FE . p s oLu t N O N( 1--lfcV s a p E s p 12.13 C 63l cx ( ; • C P I 0_=, ��LI +Z�A`-/i Cl (\.)Vae(., e i1.)) �✓s S Pry I A D 1 ?I CAA t i'crb epL ce \Jlt\ic lAiNNiOUt bK) t,,J)LS) - - pUk j-1tN6 t accrA w NI (01 Ci -06N i€f - o j vuow o cc E,76RSt-(. puskyir- ry\,\A 11\) \-11+ pNipcz-e d We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,. Signature of Direct r or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENTO I BUILDING & ZONING DER- —TVIENT EVEL'S)PIMENT APPLIC SHEET ECF - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft' warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill' and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION : Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek. TO : fl PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT . SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 ® ENGINEERING DIVISION fl TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : LI UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT J POLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Fl OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON Np,r mber 19.1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVLSION : 7)O11)ll167. APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS LI NOT APPROVED histIAC6 (JOr\)00P'3 VLANIV6 TIZIa63 / ON S.v,,?, Z7r!J rc-i ( U fTli It.-6is 2EkJ /Lei SlgC/ /) 1 : 13 B e', ftitruk &/L PAR i Cio ,J To R �.1 ��v`c� Ste ���(�� Nop Rw ' M1 O UL%b-i �f" .� u6 Cyr pOu"Y1 l-f DATE: SIGNATURE OF ! ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F) Z- DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 19R7 COMMENTS DUE: November 19,1987 EFC - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : sA-071-87, sM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors. . Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approv 1 of 1 ) a site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the co struction of • 14f3.00o scr_ ft warehn,�se with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine: 2) a ppecial permit for fi'11 end grade to LdEatilqPREaloggPpS‘Pm b c.yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 8o0 b o .k antl clirectly_zest of S ri pok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172.900 sq_ ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: There are four (4) main issues that need to be addressed by the proposed development. The most important issue is the City's Springbrook Trail System. Lesser, but never- theless important issues, are the development of the City's Wetland Park directly south of the site, a small scale onsite active recreation facility and finally, the requested reduction in parking. The City's Springbrook Trail System is the main north/south pedestrian and bicycle separated right-of-way trail for the Valley. Construction of a section of this trail system would be the most important offsite mitigation measure the project proponent . could undertake. This project should develop a site plan that takes full advantage of the trail to the east and the proposed Wetland Park to the south. The applicant has already proposed to install a shower facility, which could be compli- mented by an onsite active recreation facility, such as a workout room, a half court basketball area or a tennis practice backboard. Finally, the applicant could presumably address the above issues more effectively if the parking requirements were reduced. However, even if the applicant does not see it in those trade off terms, it is still a reasonable request, which this department supports. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inf mat' ' needed to properly assess this proposal. Signatur of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENTr'' BUILDING & ZONING DEP®'WENT ' DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET EC F - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NOBS) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft' warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION : Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the '800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek. TO: ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 ® ENGINEERING DIVISION fiTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU �1 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT fl .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT LI POLICE DEPARTMENT fl POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT flOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE. PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON Novemhpr 19,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : AlW4l4ec,,e4K1%Oti El APPROVED EIAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED The applicant needs to address off-site park and recreation mitigation issues the most important of which is the Springbrook Trail. On-site mitigation should be expanded to include a small scale area for active recreation activities. Aesthetic considerations should lead the applicant to develop a site plan and - building design that will relate visually and physically to the proposed public space adjacent to it. �4 DATE: /�/���� SIGNATU. ;27 OF DIRECTOR R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pLkOci4ANIA rh ,1987 DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: Novpe „1 ., , R9,� EFC - 060 - 873 • ,„„ I �� ^ 1 , . APPLICATION NO(S). : sA-071-87. SM-012-87 .. o � PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance MuelJer & Associates) '' `� ' �aJ PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors Office/Distr;b�tion center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications fnr approval of ll a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construci'on of a 148z000 s�_ ft warehrnse with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill end grade to Ldaffl . ppevelo47 4 00pCub c.yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial ' Located on the north side of S.W. 27thStreet at the_80n block anc3 directly est of Sitt igpok Creek. 13.3 Acres. BUILDING AREA (gross): 172,5n0 sq_ ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth ��• 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants .5) Animals • 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info nation is needed to properly assess this proposal. � � 317 Signatg - of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 FIENTruo BUILDING & ZONING DEPik -ThilENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATI N RE 1{' IE ,,:I SHEET ECF - 060 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION : Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek. TO: El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1.2/2/87 OENGINEERING DIVISION LTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT jBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT fl POLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LI OTHERS : , COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON November 1 9,1957 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ,-7;3'6__p -.-- ri APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ® NOT APPROVED r / Gp� /5 2 .f-16€ La � 71—X/4 2IL ( i ��} ' C7.12',', .----- DATE. 7 z - SIGNATURE OF RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVPSION 5/1982 Form 182 - • 2149N El____iONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE - ? �'I. .�; REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 65.,Yntre2XIh,Cj i' DATE CIRCULATED:_ November 5, 1 987 COMMENTSL-DUE: NowPmbeb 404-98T EFC - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : sA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors Office/Di s riIb it"on Cen er • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: pplications for approval of 1 ) _a_s;tP_ Eaan f_or Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2) a ppecial permit for fill and grade to LadhfrOPREWIAMOPpubi .yards• of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines substantial Located on the north side of S.W. ?7th . resat thei8(10 block and directly_itzest of S ri pok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 177,' oo SQ_ ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE • MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services '/- 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info mation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Gy ////3787 Signet o Directk or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENTrim BUILDING & ZONING DEPP�'"WENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION : Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek. TO: El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 KENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG, DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ® •BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ® POLICE DEPARTMENT fl POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ® OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE' PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON November 19,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : flAPPROVED ® APPROVED W H CONDITIONS EDNOT APPROVED 756 ga D Ye raTp✓ �'z�e,-ax/�►� - so rI,.ti"....- O Ff s /0.,. r'mot. 4/ i tee- v r -- - f///I/67 DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 CITY OF IIENTON 2149N E RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE ) ' @ CE I li!] D REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 0:A1 9 DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1g87 COMMENTS DUE: Nove r EFC - 060 - 87 1.0 NOV 5 1987 . APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87. SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributor (Lance MLelle & Associates lln IC D Luj PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors— Office/Distribution Center • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 11 a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the constrwtion_ of a 148,000 sq_ ft warehouse with a 24,500 sa. ft. office mezzanine: ?_) a ppecial mi' _ for fill and grade to LdifraFREvoelo447 400ACrb c.yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly_mest of Gnrinrt pok Creek. Sltt F�Kt�. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172,500 cc'_ ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air ✓ 3) Water ?► 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources ✓ 7) Environmental Health ✓ 8) Land and Shoreline Use �J 9) Housing ✓ 10) Aesthetics 4 51 11) Light and Glare ✓ 12) Recreation 5 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ✓ 14) Transportation LOP 15) Public Services ✓ 16) Utilities ✓ COMMENTS: . hilAdtea tkoc- 4i'/400 ak• 9147 of- fIAA'7 rwerA74.1.7716— frowl dom-41 etwet.ttis GnyptV ? 3. -Hu, MP real .r.5 a. , AAA.- wAui_ LitAt.4.42447144t.. reluoviewiti-OzP• Pot+ 414-tot, itovverrod.rat. 44-0Lett-in•tacl r .—t4.4 ►x V-ceiww. .A. fv e2' c— A r-Gifvfri.aAAM-- AtrtteAtAsistA— rek.•iet.4.01,1144-,c .9{ -t .e X. aeat- . a We hav reviewed this application wtparticular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. A Nor-115 , 11151:_ Signatur: of Director o.. Authoriz-d Representative Date Form 4 • len,A_Gottetkii buotibLayi.47 1;ro-v6uka, A) AA& L V e)GcA- a - itit-e- Ma-0471-4- rceL&L,fletoat._ ArotAlAth IsrevietootervIc., . 114.0772:67-ai tee.a.GUI (dit-ED V Ike_ I ctos4Atztp•outt.A.. AA/upitudiv ? Poeitotr, " of- -rhAdiv leA44 e.inALA. vtoo-utAt... et4L4t,Ildn1k.0, Lotiti, krint-LA. ht.aye., totiZtALd -(A4,t ro-Giscot.% AtAtet..4_, Af•ut(Aidt" tik-f IselP 41.1.4 ot.it,t.A. 011 • e-At• fUt.011.4.44417 AAjtAkt-414-A-4 AYVIeLitMArk..d 171eLn41-0(.. plearlAkili-A. FYI -IAA 4r-V- X441 WIAX, LrriA/C.44,Vt radVti,(A104- CAA-- 4Lt. VeUdial 1: 1. P 1 . RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ' • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 060 • - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 • PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ' PROJECT; Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of .a 148,000 sq. ft' warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards Of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION : Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek. TO : • ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ' . • ' • . SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 OENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG, DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU U PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT D .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT . 1-_=] POLICE DEPARTMENT ®.POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT [' OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE' PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON • Noyembpr 19,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 9I A/.0 17atagritiAttr . U APPROVED • U APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED 1, *.r.IPAIr iroweleixoLtz is , • DATE: 6I 1�6� 44(VU GNATURE F DIRECTOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 . ' • 77' re. , n :• - 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET '1 ' - , 1 il ',1' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: . . 17tre, ' . • t , W7 DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: Novembe1 EFC - 060 - 87 r'- \--c- r.--. APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 i"--r;) 7 (T.) i-,r; [ \i7 11 rr- ) PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller .c _Lissociate'sT' :1 .1.4otift [ li - PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distribu ors, Office/Distribution Center • • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: spLlatjnafor iatiLasitepianfar_ ' Phase I of a complex to allow the construcionof ä148j)00 with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine: 2) a Dpecial permit for fill and grade to LdEAfthaPREgiogen20iab permit.yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly_west of S fflEimWok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172,500 sq ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth . . 2) Air L.-- 3) Water z...-----. 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources L.----- Ciqr rtr, F7417rrON 7) Environmental Health C.------ 1-1:-v-L, E D 4.....„- lo a 8) Land and Shoreline Use vavifil991 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics c--- 11) Light and Glare '/ - - 12) Recreation . BUI12, ,t'ta I ilui4ittiG Eil:PT. 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation il---- . .*- , ' .. ,• t--- 14) Transportation t 1r I' 15) Public Services f 16) Utilities .---' , ' b" / • COMMENTS: 7) i 4 A ss5 .3 53 1'4'1(9 LA+ 47))y Tr ztA.,s• 13 LO 1," 1--a-4----Col-\ .)je_t_., ..,11..i 7.- 0 i• <, .6,t-Lt.- ,, 0 ) 7,6 6 i '.:-,"‹,:e--- ' 2:6 .3 °•c' 1',? A r7 7 — x /9 ---- 1'9 4/ 7 . ----------.— A' \/ ,ZiO•'? if 14b I L/ 2 --------— - - A ' / 0 o 1 ),-_i :,-„7),11,.. /1*-1w4(7- e ,-.,/,4 1,. ( L-'0 - 1-)Y a m cl1 (..' --Q ) ',- -GP. ril7Z `,::',)/ ci-[--,,-...-/ (. Jic.w--;,-7.7--,---/- .0' -) e./ -7 ') '•' c.--,),) '•:-V- i i',_:' -1--.('-fc ,, ! '.4 i.,4) --,/),-_•,,:; , „, 1_ , rJ / - 0 -!-- l" l ' ' , ..,-,.) :/,Y'.. q- / ,41 , / if,--2 --/-)c. ;.( JI,Ae,__( ts -k)-"o\cr,?q,11-ed -1-11_,c) We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. -L--)-2 _, , ,I. / Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date I '1 3ta // :,'-+:1-0 vi 's ki,--e--0--, 1,0,e, 'i)--)r,-.)u)„,!..,,,c1 ci.4 d Form 4 ascid i -/- rci Li /2).' 1-11(7-ya-L-kspoli-hi/E-,i--, /F..) ..) )1 ,-.7';2i-• /,'.,. -5 /1.,;,,._,7- ';'.[,--•! ,,t/1-; RENT(' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA ENT DEVELOPMENT APP UCATIIi0;N REVEEW SHEET ECF - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION : Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek.TO : JJ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 ENGINEERING DIVISION RTRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION fl FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ri POLICE DEPARTMENT r--1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE. PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON _o -mhpr 1 9,1 987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : T'A FF((. EKG I l\l LIE LE- ) KG ® APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED /D SSe, S(S Lv Big,, c-1 )i .1/1-1) 4\0/ r f% [7-'7 9 1 J z 3 f�a e lv e ' '62 '7er 4, 44 x 197 f L/O) lU -) 1-bT ��-1nvn� , `a 1 ), PG 1 4,1 2 F") _r PAY_ ,, _j ,, :7 14 -{? �c .y i 5 z��r �4.1'c� 7`�re. e1--c,77a'llz-1-1d(-) (� e DATE: /UP II, )7 l. a 7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR I OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE n� f;�, .T. ,, ,�' ,E- e7 :, �Q U !Cl- �eG / � c i S Po of /Q� /� -� ��i 7, /$l-41;?z `�G�eyv� FdEC�I810PJ 5/1982 Form 182 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEt f• ; `—' La • 4_• I t REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: kCli, _ DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, l9S7 COMMENTS DUE: November 19,1987 EFC - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : sA-071-87` SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distri;butors, . Office/Distribution Center • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A i cations for a�oroval of l ) Site Plan for • Phase 1 of a complex to allow the constr ct�on of a 148,f)0n ss_ ft warehouse__ with a 24,500. sct. ft. offi'ce mezzanines 2) a �ecial nermi - for fill and grade to L w` aiDaeveloA7 1-2 Oloubivards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial ' Located on the north side of S.W. 27th_ Streat • . •Ie block and directly_Iaest of sffEifigkpok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 177.500 sq- ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air JIIIIIIIIII 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 1111111111! 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 11111111111 14) Transportation 15) Public Services JIIIIIIIIII 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • 9 L^)0.S k e�a\w h 1 ✓- 4-1 CC. /LL QS C� U 0 e a- �c 1C- ^jc,, I e �o r e.e c� 1 roc «Jv y 1 zJ -c 11 1 c, 1/ ro 0.1) 041 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we 'have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. - uk,--- Z -- ✓ �- //7-efi Signature of D. ector or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 p REt4T°I" BUILDING & ZONING DEPA --MEW DEVELOP 'wM ENT APPLICATION c' EVIEW SHEET ECF - 060 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION : Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek. TO: fl PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 ® ENGINEERING DIVISION flTRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION fl FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS a RECREATION DEPARTMENT LBUIL)ING & ZONING DEPARTMENT A POLICE DEPARTMENT ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON Norpmber 19,1987 0 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : "Pn( ice ri APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • . � XZz) DATE: /7— 7 87 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 TON �P c z y 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE V �' f ` r �x �; iwali REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pr v.e 4 rr\ I,. ," G DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: November19,19874,4d EFC - 060 - 87 31011 ' APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87. SM-012-87 151 � � PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller r Associates) PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors— Office/Distribution Center • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1 ) a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 1 4£3,000 sq_ ft warehcrose with a 24,500 sg1 ft office mezzan' to Ldaftballilegkson4m,n00AS'ub cc.yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial Located on the north side of S W 27th r _ a _ th SAS block and directly_west of SriApok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172.500 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities_ COMMENTS: • • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified' areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /7 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da Form 4 • RENTS--- BUILDING & ZONING DEN —BMENT • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a.148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill' and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of Springbrook Creek. TO: fl PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 ® ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1=1 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION g FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT [' POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT EIOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO,. THE BUILDING. & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON Notenb r l A TAR7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI ON : ® APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED !� rcG2 ,--..e .-w-;-cf 2 .GGL��/� c .- y . S-,Soo �n f �'3"2 ^G� c am ��, --�- �� �_ e. (/'0 ft 141Z,e, �ti�� /Aso' 30:42,e/ u�. _ ate/ a�' � - a 944eA6' ) •G DATE: j1w. C, /9;1°7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 LANCE MUELLER ILETWE CDF UQ eOSIEITTMIL ASSOCIATES/ARCHITEC1 b 130 Lakeside Suite 250 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 DATE0R39 • a7 J09 NO. (206) 325-2553 ATTEVTION % JC��, /A),Q //}.Jy'�,� ,(/ RE:TO /,J/�J�/(�/f�Z�J.�/l /���"J / 3 - ,` , 1 n/ \J 1I �� 1 l 1 I` I.I�' 2gyp. i` i 1 I1 I—,it m, '..I f: 9 I S. C.. WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: — O Shop drawings ❑ Prints 0 Plans �"�C Sampl s 0 Specifications ElCopy of letter 0 Change order .S' Mr COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints f For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO 1) SIGNED: PRODUCT 240-z fi jInu,Groton,Mass.0147I If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. LANCE MUELLER LIET3n OF 11 G°1 MSfi1][117a[i ASSOCIATES/ARCHITEC'... 130 Lakeside Suite 250 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 DAT JOB NO. 67(206) 325-2553 ATTEN ION ' TO AlLtkt i .. Z(06-77 /71 0/437-7' I WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: — O Shop drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications O Copy of letter 0 Change order 0 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION a 41(SeC/ ,D01...9 — A /, G /, ivrG & %ei eiude eie Gar- - e 4_ 3 :,-454et-r4-074 d/ ./ e7,c. e 7L. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: O For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution Xr ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE _ 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS / Air-d -$"(/I! 6.ethfiee--4-#:L. - f< • /10 )& Age : *,14.4i 0 / (-I ye- ep., 7‘- ?Lk le -i-ovi v / yj- 0,44.(.. . COPY TO Pd SIGNED: PRODUCT 2442 ( Eaj Inc,Croton,etas otaTt. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. I lance mueller & associates architects October 22, 1987 CITY OF RENTON Building & Zoning Dept. 200 Mill Avenue So. Renton, Washington 98055 Re: ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS Dear Sir: Alaska Distributors is an office/warehouse distribution facility designed for the distribution of merchandise to Alaska via truck. The project is two phased - phase 1 is the south portion of the site including the new proposed structure with surrounding parking and truck maneuvering. Phase 1 consists. of 148,000 s.f. warehouse with 24,500 s.f. office mezzanine. Future development will include another 140,000 s.f. of warehouse and 24,000 s.f. of office mezzanine. The building is constructed of tilt-up concrete panels, dryvit over-hang above truck loading doors and insulated tinted exterior glazing. All concrete and dryvit to be painted in warm earth tones. Phase 2 is the north portion of the site where future expansion is to occur. For the present, the site will be filled to parking lot elevation as shown on civil drawings. Phase 2 should be under separate permit from phase 1 , but run concurrently. The site plan will feature significant landscaping and parking for 229 cars (owner wishes to reduce this to 115) . If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sine- = ., v l �n' SOCIATES/ARCHITECTS 4kJ e r Patrick Kerr F,•` ,_8_ PK:nk ! _..� 0C12219 ,� ) CU LDING/ZONING DEPT, 130 lakeside • suite 250 • seattle,washington 9B122[206]325-2553 fence mueller aia,cal•senior associates:robert olscheweky,eileen furney associates:robert Fadden,michael gaibraith,richard hamlet',robert wells a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by and under the supervision of registered architects P5. 001 NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING , DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 148,000 SQ. FT. WAREHOUSE WITH A 24,500 SQ. FT. OFFICE MEZZANINE AND SUB- STANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITHIN 200 FT. OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS FILES: SA-071-87, SM-012-87 GENERAL LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 27TH STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK AND DIRECTLY WEST OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. • PUBLIC APPROVALS: 1. SITE APPROVAL 2. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT 3. BUILDING PERMIT The application can be reviewed at the Bulding and Zoning Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2540. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. Ronald G. Nelson Building & Zoning Director CERTIFICATION F. Li 1.31) HEREBY CERTIFY THAT "�h-►IiE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME ON J' E.P're.wm5 R 3 , 19 81 ,IN '04Kee CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEAR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in _ 1E/li% , on the y t h day of .('Z-PrE' %3 6-i2 ,/ • a� s CITY OF RENTOTAT mum BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director August 11, 1987 William S. Tsao 2201 6th Avenue Suite 1008 Seattle, WA 98121 Subject: Michael R. Mastro Lot Line Adjustment, S.W. 27th Street Dear Mr. Tsao: The Renton Building and Zoning Department is in receipt of the above referenced application for a lot line adjustment between two lots. We understand that this is desired to allow the firm of Alaska Distributors to locate a new building along the eastern side of the property. As the adjustment you desire involves shifting the common line between Lots 1 and 2 a full 90°, this cannot be construed as a minor adjustment under the City's lot line adjustment procedure. This is a major reconfiguration of the lots. The method for a major readjustment of property lines is to have the property replatted through a short plat process. This method does require more time and is costlier, but can be done concurrently with the pending site plan approval application we have with Alaska Distributors. We are therefore returning to you, your lot line adjustment application and check in the amount of $100. 00. If you wish to pursue this matter through the short plat procedure, please let us know so that we may assist you with the proper forms and steps in accomplishing the replat. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact either myself or Jerry Lind of this office. S . • Do . rickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:JFL:csb:dskl LtTsao Enclosure . 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 • tro . ti 0 CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director August 11, 1987 William S. Tsao 2201 6th Avenue Suite 1008 Seattle, WA 98121 Subject: Michael R. Mastro Lot Line Adjustment, S.W. 27th Street Dear Mr. Tsao: The Renton Building and Zoning Department is in receipt of the above referenced application for a lot line adjustment between two lots. We understand that this is desired to allow the firm of Alaska Distributors to locate a new building along the eastern side of the property. As the adjustment you desire involves shifting the common line between - Lots 1 and 2 a full 90°, this cannot be construed as a minor adjustment under the City's lot line adjustment procedure. This is a major reconfiguration of the lots. The method for a major readjustment of property lines is to have the property replatted through a short plat process. This method does require more time and is costlier, but can be done concurrently with the pending site plan approval application we have with Alaska Distributors. We are therefore returning to you, your lot line adjustment application and check in the amount of $100. 00. If you wish to pursue this matter through the short plat procedure, please let us know so that we may assist you with the proper forms and steps in accomplishing the replat. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact either myself or Jerry Lind of this office. Do rickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:JFL:csb:dskl LtTsao Enclosure . 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 ......__ _ 3, . zl 1 \\ 11,c..i . r// : ,__ _ I4 . , ,. :; _. I ,q J4o 1"1 NO. 4.t • ' 3..U.). 19TH 517 •I SY ( -�ti.) 32 , 1 a i ' 1 1 \ G..id ii, J . I P17 I• Q ._ ,t_Q S 16 0 ® C w 7151 1 5 T T w `\ Emma= - '— ,1 Eimw 2 - 1 1-_=u2. —--7.1 ... 1' :],.-:,..-:;-.;;IliH:7, I,J9" . 11 1 Z sobJEC'f 3'. !ki . 4, . — . I 0,,1 F W . r. J •• , I y G ® I .b I I I 1 I I I I I I i � IZ it 10 I • 2 I I L I _9lf ST s Q- 411k I I I I I 7 8 9 z --I I I I I ter. I - - ✓11_ -- _ 40 ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS (LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES) SITE PLAN APPROVAL: - SA-071-87 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM-012-87 APPLICANT LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA 13.3 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 27th STREET. EXISTING ZONING M-P (MANUFACTURING PARK) EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE USE - COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION COMMENTS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 27th STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK AND DIRECTLY WEST OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THE APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE A SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL. 4 J' a s � �� I —,o _______ \ LE__w_i ,..7_, NO. 4}�• L- I 4 dY iv On d; ` , , n. ,... (4 __ , 1 . I _ W- ---- W— 4 U > >,-.____ O4 I I ---- -- I. • 1' —9- — - -~ - it ' x I 1Pr' 's ,,7- - .,-'i SubJECsr 31 , .., , +.y A ' 0,5 1, S y r QI , , �, , 4- _______J . / !, , . .... 'r 1 ,/ ! I t' a , ,' pit .''' Lf .0 . A ' I\ G 1) i l © ` , I I • I o I I IZ II 10 1 ,,[, • ..., .. A-- I. r I I I —.)--) I I , I 7 8 9 z I 1 1 I I V 11 I 1 11 I i ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS (LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES) . SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-071-87 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM-012-87 APPLICANT LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA 13.3 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 27th STREET. EXISTING ZONING M—P (MANUFACTURING PARK) EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE WAREHOUSE .AND. OFFICE USE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION COMMENTSLOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 27th STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK AND DIRECTLY WEST OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THE APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE A SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL. , -- I _1 E .. __., __ tl'@, Si ...., . I � _ -1 .2' . I =; a, Li I h = �.�.,�.�.. — 11 l�l ��1� 't`- I s O� II I I I I � -, , F0 1 1 , , ' ;,_, i3 1 111 SN ;il lllITI I II � bI iI II III� r I I I � I I t II IrI � sn I I I IN I III I ' �' QjAo �' •c 4 � .+' .��aP• ,V a ®CO ;- c �, . 0 . . sP SPRINGBROOK CREEK 1 ig,41 , i g i 1 -,t4p,z la kt.. . i .1 % zzv. ' 0 ram == i1rN9U •I ('il � � � ii' 1 t z $ Fr Z i Ili zs Q 41 fZ4 -6 > ; \- .. E o ? it c 111 „, V" 1 i 1/1 4 R o F 1 1 it ' N 6' 0 c c I lit,. F O O ¢ - Ss r I 2 Ea UI ; I!l9 .. N LANDSCAPE PLAN ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS r d�^• lance mueller c,1 & associatcp SW 27th$IHttl arehiteete aia ,..,...... w ..'" .......... RENTON,WASI-QNGTON J..ei �. d.. • GENERAL NOTES ___________ .••___LEL_____;. _,...,- . — _,j( i.j 1 I 1 I Li i 3.Verl 4 144.of 41 41114 442. !,=:_._ n _________ , i;,,....,:._,......,.... : _______________ _____ 44444 4.4 oleo.441 44144 le us be 4444.4 4.• -------;L_______________;L________ _i ; (__ 1 ,•• NN.N.,•N. a a.n.‘wears. c 3 1,2 c..-,..,),▪—.4.4—.),:-,.....,..;.,.c.....,....r.,.... „.tzr,',77,;. :2 z:qn,..°.:1:7.::,:'.."-"'-'---'• ( . : --.-_____-----,-- , -7:g;z„7.7:',r:',.r•-".'7, —,-:!"'----•""'— 1111• • 1.4444 betwee el1.1.or a.44. 0 t . . 0 el CD -.,;-- 2..re...n........aa.Ern,o...a...a....... ET) I . I .•.; .,.;.::::::,;:;."4::..rr::,.„—4414 prIse 4 444 of Oa.474.1=.14.4 Le 1.441.4.4 444 44a 44r 4 1._____• GI Z— .—...,-- gd IZ- .= 41 33.4w1rea 414nto per Clty C411.4 1.3 4 444441 414 4 a = i . I -4, - ...ne.tanam.......n...us n.. n.....I.... a.n......n ri........ I — — 7 _.. — 0 )i) N VICINITY MAP rl _ .,, , • ,rn i- -• 3_' X*. .11.N.li 1 ''..-1 7. -- i • Z -• t, •:,--• - • Id 11 • Cr . i . -Nile;`.‹. --.- -- 1.• .' ;I I.i t,,.IT: V I- '.! "•-•‘: ; r N C/1 .,--,_ .e.,--,_-_---..._14,.. . ,ki- •• _. ,. . 7 I.';-..14 .' ,r* ' 'r..i "10 ''. it ' • -=':t, Alf r'',..,` ;IVA' "'"I ,"I-- ,••i ,.. -1711VITrir"—Wii16.17.-4 1 4 - ;I, • -•'a .,'C'''.'.qatt 'l aCia_k I - -416',6 ' 4i .517-E • tLX)& 1/2. .../ 1.1447.4 0. I I- . _ , — i.. 1- • ...., _. -,,- ,........•—......:ins.x..-- I c.....,-.... SC.% 7:4':::::..• i I ----1 — — '. ..- '''' '-';..47,5r1 ' l'--r.,'4 f •1- .4..,t-1 q I —I il-- --„T'irti. '1. 4..'''''': .-i : . :. /. . •ii, A ,.i . ....-^—e-.;)S., • : J"!- ,I.: ..- .....,, ---.4 'It en ILI 112-E ' 'j-r ______ ,' 2 II .---- LI'- . :.I -* L. 771 i V, - . :.I-4,-' : 1: _ . ) . •1— — . ...1_ . _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION o ./I I— — .1 444 of tee 4444.44 4.ear0441.444.1...... t g ,i'-dj-.1..:t-, Q......................,,.... I 1 B '''• -.,.)i • • ,.• „ , rx.:7.1.117.2:„.::,,i1:::,.,-.,:r..-.111,1::=4...1.,•=4, n 4/4•414 uo obe go of Nold 114.4 I.CZ ; • , .., 11111 Ili ITIL . : . .. ..:,. ,. Ititi) .4 17.;r:l7:11.1::761."•:::.:Xlat It:74:11.-.7:Z.::.:.'" Troce 4.1,44114•ItO llso ogelb I.at eeld lorgise 10 feet to 4 e.co CO O .14._..______,,•,e_Lcy.).'• • e er,,c ,,,,,._ i_4_, ...j... i• •:,—,11-e_^-- —---::::::::=ILV.."1:::::::',11::::'.:7::.::.:;- 3'- : E a ; '‘..." .1.. i I'Sillijill2-1' LI 1 1 ialL 1 i ii 1,7ril _ . .,_ . .____... i....., .......n..........n -1 C 4 AV IV IOW 4 .i.11/410 oe•4:4":4"------ ./...4 .•••4......,44.1.0..1.I.4 oold 14114.4 tbe 44 a- Cid .-- --"' ".ri:!.----....--- 41''''....----.------ 4 4.114. .. ./1,<.....,. .. . . ..........,.... p.m......,.... .......n —....._,L...--.4_2r4,''if 4t•IN r:c....e....,......,,_ SW 27th 4ter.4114 1414 40.0211. t1i ; '• , STREET_.._..r. .••..... .r......,.,.......... ,••••••; — '" ul r. —• ..---.._L?trrr_1_,..•-...-... ,e",•Pols 44, — , `.... I_ • • :l . • SI I 1;i - 1 I -J —� \/ N I / 1 I, / -7 f __ I _ T' . I i i 1 .--.) iLFII o o j,/ L P I }1 '' /� / I ! I I r x l 1 o i 1" 7--ri i • I \�_ __/ :v 1 1 }1 1`1 $ ma \\ o.n 1\ l 51 I c T CV �— T vo i I / —oo 01ao 1—.1 5.--- a ^. 3-m �� \1 P�n_� r I -- 1 \ ) / 7 ¢ I II t a 1 mI II o2- '� o im, 1 Lp _ / , I T 1 1 a8 r -i I / r / t 7 , ) T- -T ; I . 1 VF,;___- J 1 1 I 1 ; !. _jia,.I '''' 7,:: . \ el ¢ _ .m ¢. .� I InI 1 It _y----- _ - le' IY l ••—� �� e ne i �Ii=\ tit f s R G - R o - k_ � — r _ h,I111 II 4s i8 o p. I 0• IS :is r� , a . n_ it �-1sI, ` t ' �' I. .•.I,I SCHE IC GR.o I. 0 4 .+ Imo,-,- P H,I , V .-., g a s >a t n o I sH I our=e s %/�d BUSH,ROED&HITCHINGS,INC. fISP°`�° '� CIVIL[NmuEcnS L LAND sunvLVORS SEAL — ' Y. Re.,:e'n1,.Ha9,TSH RB H .22 dI OF RFti U c% © Z 1 211 '2 09 111::::::1/1 ,, III ICE 0,91TEO sole" OF PENDING I • : SITE , A. I , ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS FILE #: SA-071-87 & SM-012-87 DESCRIP ,. ION : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 148,000 SQ. FT. WAREHOUSE WITH A 24,500 SQ, F. OFFICE MEZZANINE & SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT MEZZANINE & SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPEMNT WITHIN 200 FEET OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. . GENERAL LOCATION ANII:/OR _ADDRESS: ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 27TH STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK AND DIRECTLY WEST OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. PUBLIC APPt• VALS REQ .' IRED : 1. SITE APPROVAL 2, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT 3, BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING II. EPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS . ., ND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION •�� 7 o `''ITY OF RENTO"T FILE NO(S): A=o7 -&1 C) E; t L...LDING & ZONING DEPARTI..LNT 8 e'-'1 `')'872' 4 „k ` - oho a 41) N MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I 1 TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES d.nee /4�e%r A.. ,,. . Q REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS - /3 0 1�// . fie #- .s-e) CJ SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* 5 Qe 6 9 p/ 2- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* - TELEPHONE D SITE PLAN APPROVAL Zt4A,0 "?' SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 426 °. (Ve)G) 3 5 - c2-5�3 No. of Cubic Yards:4'/4 C) CONTACT PERSON Q . VARIANCE* From Section: • NAME * Justification Required ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 1 / 5 0 Z.4 /d/ 7. 257 D SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP ' Q TENTATIVE PLAT S _CC-./V// 91/7-2- ® PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 3 ,? .5-- a.ems 3 . 1::::1 WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME //� /� PLAT NAME: /o6e, -!//5 7?g to ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: /•oe/ S,+', 1 Ae So' Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP E] FINAL -ea,',k ?fre P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE /�„ -,2 - 7 3// ID Residential Q Industrial C!� O l Commercial Q Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: , PROPERTY ADDRESS Q TENTATIVE ) 4-55 J/cam/a6-73 `/ EXISTING USE ( PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Q FIZ- V LSTi,l O 077D4J NUMBER OF SPACES: f ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 1 2'}-�- SQ. FT.- ACRES }-��FEES - 0 l AREA: S .1 l 5 / IOTA`` Figs J0 _. _ C TY PT= t N�'t~N,STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING STAMP u DATE TAMP I L'i �? u 1.4� f APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: argn i APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: \j've�L. ae' 98 Q Accepted Incomplete Notification Sent Oh: By: : L.:_)-,1G/ZONING DEPT, (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: ,, Li ,®!Zjq't?f APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 5 ti."COL/ 05P-nn,j i E1 Accepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: Mikkiilding Ei Design Eng. E Fire E1 Parks II Police =3, Policy Dev. l=J Traffic Eng. v Utilities • REVISED 1-31-84 . ' I Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). II AFFIDAVIT ' I, isaA `f2/r,C , being duly sworn, declare that I am []uthorized representative to act for the property .owner; owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS o 9 — DAY OF 19 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE S ATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT `•\ (Na of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) rc-c/e --gr,.otr- /3 Q,kl ch (Address) 'I (Address) III (City) (State) : (Zip) 1. 00 3 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 � r • That portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. in King County, State of Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Section; Thence south along the east line of said Section a distance of 180.01 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to -and 180 feet southerly, measured at right angles to the north line of said Section; Thence westerly, parallel with the north line of said Section 20 feet to an intersection with a line parallel to and 20 feet westerly, measured at right angles to the east line of said Section, and the true point of beginning; Thence southerly 1074.37 feet along said line parallel to and 20 feet westerly measured at right angles to the east line of said Section; Thence north 88°24'48" west 560 feet; Thence northerly, parallel to the east line of said Section, 1095.48 feet more or less to the intersection with a line which runs north 87°12'59" west from the true point of beginning; Thence easterly, parallel with the north line of said Section, to the true point of beginning. EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Renton for road purposes by deed recgrded under Recording Number 8401240272. CITY OF RENTON JUL 2 91987 BUILDING/ZONING DEFT. lance mueller & associates architects July 23, 1987 CITY OF RENTON Building & Zoning Dept. 200 Mill Avenue So. Renton, Washington 98055 Re: ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS Dear Sir: Alaska Distributors is an office warehouse/distribution facility designed for the distribution of merchandise to Alaska via truck. The project consists of 148,000 s.f. warehouse with 24,500 s.f. office mezzanine. Future development will include another 140,000 s.f. of warehouse and 24,000 s.f. of office mezzanine. The building is constructed of tilt-up concrete panels, dryvit over-hang above truck loading doors and insulated tinted exterior glazing. All concrete and dryvit to be painted in warm earth tones. The site plan will feature significant landscaping and parking for 285 cars. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sin ere' y LANCE _,& ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS Patrick Kerr PK:nk 130 lakeside• suite 250 • seattle,washington 913122(205]326-2553 lance mueller aie,cal•senior associates:robert olscheweky,eileen furney associates:robert fedden,michael gaibraith,richerd hernish,robert wells a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by and under the supervieionof registered architects LANCE MUELLER LEM OF U'E[ SIE DUMIL ASSOCIATES/ARCHITEC... z. 130 Lakeside Suite 250 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 DATE JOB NO. 5 . (206) 325-2553 A 7 RE: TO 0 k 1L S Teiira/MieZ WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans 0 Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION CITY OF RENTON ENGINEERING DEPT. cly=?f-RENTON THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS rr- Z COPY TO �— SIGNED: PROINCT240-2 (NJ Inc,Gmtnn,M�01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE: ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS APPLICANT: LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES APPLICATION NUMBER: SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-071-87 The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER Adjoining to West Longprop Development 510 Rainier Ave. So. 252304-9064-04 Seattle, WA 98144 252304-9058-02 Adjoining to North Burlington Northern R.R. 2100 First Interstate Center 252304-9019-00 999 Third Ave. 252304-9001-00 Seattle, WA 98104 • Adjoining to South (across street) City of Renton Renton City Clerk 252304-9076-00 . Renton, WA 98055 Adjoining to East Mobile Oil Co. c/o Olympic Pipeline 302305-9084-02 612 So. Flower St.' Los Angeles, CA 90017 Mobile Oil Co. Property Tax Division 302305-9086-00 P. 0. Box 290 Dallas, Texas 75221 • CITY OF REN O,'' JUL 291987 BU1LDING/ZONING DEPT. 1 ' ASSESSOR'S i NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER I CERTIFICATION I, 3nn2ict T,&k , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the Kin Count Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to be re me, a Notary Public, in and or the State of Washington ; residing at -e_ on the c 5 day of Z---) . cam,- ___--- S CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I, "-3-EK ( F.l.tion , hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on AAS�, 21, l i87, to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at F;tiT©n.) , on the 2 7 t , day of c i ()s 1 3-? C o_<j C o0C_p SIGNED: Lvn i FORM 2QB OF R4,4,j, ECF: ( —nt0-87 4. S - D7l-Bi t LU: ly 0 z City of Renton - o s P �S 61 0, P ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 9g7 4 1) SEP.T°'It Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this check.;dist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Alaska Distributors 2. Name of applicant: Lance Mueller & Associates/Architects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact.person: Pat Kerr 130 Lakeside, Suite 250 Seattle, WA 98122 (206) 325-2553 4. Date checklist prepared: July 23, 1987 5. Agency requesting checklist: Building & Zoning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): October 1 , 1987 begin building construction February 1 , 1988 occupancy CITY OF RENTC J - 1MD 'JUL 2 fgay • BUILDING/ZONING DPT, 7. Do you have any poor future additions, expansions, arther activity related _ , to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. Yes, site plan shows future expansion. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. N.A. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. N.A. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits, that will be needed for your proposal, if known. N.A. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Natural earth tone color painted tilt-up/dryvit office/warehouse distribution facility. Office space has solar bronze! insulated glass. Structural fill under slab with perimeter landscaping and gener41 site improvements. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. See attached. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); a) rolling, hilly, steep slopes,' mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site;(approximate percent slope)? 2%o c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sandy clays, silty clay and sandy gravel d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. - 2 - • a. Describe the pose, type, and approximate qu ies of any filling or �` grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. l l0 do cS 7 S66 G'/l//G „Da 7e ,e7. b(It V 71 Y�oc-`(J 4i►t�, al o ` ), compacted select fill (bldg. pad) and 12" of compact fill below paling area. /)nt,,,s-)i of / = /7/yoo'-y pffil`St - a�000 f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing. construction, dr use? If so. generally describe. Temporary erosion control measures will be utilized to contain erosion completely on site. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? /o..30 67 72% OF Pfislse 0,06 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth. if any: Containment ditches, sedimentation pond(s) , and hay bail dams or other means as required to contain on site. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Normal equipment exhaust emissions during construction, as well as dust (rains should help mitigate) . Post construction vehicle exhaust emissions from normal car and truck traffic. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Spring brook creek/ditch. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, site improvements and building construction. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Does not apply. CITY OF F2NTO'I re \II WI OCT 2219F - 3 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. .. _ zer:, Any 4)' '5 Will.the 'prof 'ii, require surface.water withdrav-`=1 or diversions? Give . _ ! general desci _ on, purpose, and approximately qu ties if known. No.. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? '.If.so, note location on the site plan. . No. 6) .Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. , Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known., No. ' 2) ' Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing ,the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of I.. collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? .Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water. will'.be collected by city approved on site detention system. 2) Could waste materials ,enter ground or surface waters? .If so, generally describe. No. - 4 - d. Proposed r ts to reduce or control surfaced, and runoff water impacts, if any: See 3.c. 1 ) above 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other 'a Shrubs rX grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Shrubs and grasses over 95% of the site. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Do not know of any. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed landscape includes maples, pines, rhododendrons, azaleas, laurels, ivy, lawn and miscellaneous other local plant material indigenous to the area. A natural area to the east side of the site will 5. Animals remain undistrubed. a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Cc ty mamma I s Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other riUrre b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Do not know. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Do not know. - 5 - d. Proposed rilOas to preserve or enhance wildliny: , _I Preservation of existing grasses plus addition of new plant material (see B.4.d. above) 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric or natural gas for heating, lighting manufacturing ventilation, etc. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included Ihnett • plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Comply with Washington State Energy Code. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health 'hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. C 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: No. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Do not know. 111 2) What types#ovals of noise would be createdr associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, • construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction will generate typical construction noise. Operation of the plant will generate insignificant noise. Vehicle noise will include 30 passenger cars + /day at 8a.m. and 5 p.m. , 8 truck trips per day +. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vacant, undeveloped. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? M-P. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Manufacturing park. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not Applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 70 - 80 including truck drivers. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 75% + of the work force will come from the local area. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. - 7 - i 1. Proposed rams to ensure the proposal is coiible with existing and - projected land uses and plans, if any: Do not know 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided. if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 28' - 0" above floor line; 32' - 0" above grade at dock high doors; plus additional. 3' ± to roof ridge plus roof top equipment. Exterior: painted smooth concrete & dryyit solar tint glass. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or cont Il01 aesthetic impacts, if any: Architectural and landscape design. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Office lighting will be visible at night through the window system. Site lighting will be provided by security wall pack lights on the side of the building during hours of darkness. b. Could light or glare from the. finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No safety hazard. No views at night. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Existing street lights on both Lind Avenue and S.W. 27th Avenue. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Wall pack lights will be non-glare type. - 8 - , 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Interurban trail . b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Shower facility can accommodate individual workouts. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: • -Does not apply 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Entrance drives at south property lines will access S.W. 27th Street and Lind Avenue. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? No: 500 yards + to nearest stop. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Project provides 285 stalls; eliminates none. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. - 9 - e. Will the pr use (or occur in the immediate ty of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 50 - 60 cars coming in morning and leaving at night plus 5 trucks during the day and 20 trucks during t the nitgtt. g. Propose measures to reduce or contro ranspor a ion impacts, if any: None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Police and fire protection - yes; emergency only. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. Utilities a. Circle u • •= curren y a ailable at the site: lectricity ural gais a er,, efuse services telephonet=- septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility • providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity - Puget Sound Power and Light Gas - Washington Natural Gas water, refuse (PNB) , sanitary C. SIGNATURE I, th-. .ersigned, sta - ..at to the best of my knowledge the above information is tr - and complete. It is •■erstood that :the lead agency may withdraw any de, laration of non-sig • icanc= I. at it might issue in reliance upon this checklist sho ,d there be a �i I ul mis, • ` en ation or willful lack of full disclosure on my pa • ,� �I -�4��' 1 Proponent: A- -�•� Name Printed: Pat Kerr - 10 - #176 11-8-84 • 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: November 19,1987 EFC - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors. Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1 ) a Site Plan for li Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a T48,000 sq_ ft warehnnae . with, a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine:' 2) a ppecial permit for fill and grade to L n' allrvelop7,400pglb c.yards of material on the site; ' and 3)Shorelines Substantial Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directl west of Srigpok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172,500 sq_ ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE • MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY , 1) Earth 1 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 1 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) _Transportation 15) Public Services 1 16) Utilities COMMENTS: I 1 , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we ; have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPA 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET IECF - 060 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) •PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval Of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I Of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft- warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit. LOCATION : Located on the north side of SW': 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of • Springbrook Creek. TO: , El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87 OENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG, DIVISION 10 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU tiPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1:1BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT fl POLICE DEPARTMENT fl POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE' PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON • Npvember 19.1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : . ® APPROVED [1] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 1 _ 1 DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182