Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA87-071 MEMORANDUM
To Date 1, 1°�`6a
From S-Q-\.
Subject •DES �(3•3 �.v, ,� , s►� ��\-a7
ow1'`Q2vS a h• C60 b �r9 0� o� Lpcv�cy
J ri Yn ,o,.`��--• _�J
-)-(As
i
0
0 •
366 . 50 +
425 . 00 +
124 . 00 +
915 . 50 -�
. I
l
0 o I. 91 -"Q,:
f : i ; ,n,:e
e rvv // ' , < o
Ir / I I'l` /l I s / r .-----��I•I` _.__
\1 , , L _,J
,l' 1 {
oaa e�od F - k✓vr _� :p',.,.\\Hi�. - arxr . Tix.. rr" -- c6
V INDUSTRIAL i PARK I_I R,�. 11
_I_ s i 1 Ji T
1.RENTON IC I •
\`\ \\ \\\.c'lA 3 1, �I m
I p
L I •N -.G T O V N • N PO R T H E R YN m S ill
o 'Il
0
_ W0 1
R IBA L PARK A R K R E N T 0 N a f1 `...o c ' s ql DJ
5 /o,.d 0 it, Z
` " '' I'a= = I 141 z
LIRE AVE. _• �•
s c ;11t1
. A Ifl
, e
n ? R mE P'0 L A T N .1e E •
r,ii�
r;
" .,=-=---:-- —'1 -"-i'"--::1:---- I.'--- ,----!-::;--r,--: 2 l'ili
O N AN O R T H E R N}1 OR I L L 1 A _ elJn
e :F ,III
--- ---- —--—-- •I — ..'gym"l, YII
IL '1111'
P A'R K 0'F R ON T O"N D I',V. 15 III II
.:.I
--- --- --- - -- - -- -- - -
- 'i ,._._._•pc„—..._—_- _.—.__. ___'.-_.EAST_•--•VALLEY =�PD: _—_.—'+reGa-
II_
lance mueller ������ c.� ,�uu�d..w"
A ,°e,\ & a::oclatcBh RENTON WANGTitects aia S W 271h STREET
2 e 3a IeFeeide•eeeccla ws.M1.a9tee ¢Oe 3¢a¢a63 tlece A ne evlelon
INIMMINIMIIM—r
13
T I ? ?
I =
c `. ,. ? (1) /
. . mom.
--r-
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11IIIIIIIIIII—IIIIIIliii11111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII_II'_' „_ .^4, -"e
. .2.M. o oe�E �. fflohlo�l L. • ••AM.�E M.o�.t..�o�!o�.Pgo•Moo�. OEM.M M MR 0 4 K5 — u p
al
_E--•-' A ' S:'-- T'•, Y rE-' L E V AT ION -
Nlij
I I I I I
Z
• aNI
W E S __ T
ELEVATION
Ir o
Q 4 Q Q 0au z
0 cc
\ - — - h ~
N O R T H ELE V AT I 0 N ~
w
.. .. w
I
q ? q q q p o -
1 I I I-
nrw w. �nr o..>..m.e M L
. I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 Z- ,_._...-...:..
SOUTH EL E V AT ION
.. - CI n
• m
0
yal m
U nm
d m
i7 c
CIC)L e
m to'O
z 7U
o CO mO _
a
C
J
• W
<No
ConsultantsEarth Inc.
Geotechnical Engineers,Geologists
U Environmental Scientists
August 17, 1987 E-3453
Alaska Distributors Company
4601 - 6th Avenue South '`..., „� 1
Seattle, Washington 98108
-- \_ l i .
(I ,t
• Attention: Mr. Alex Schulman j111�� A'-' � '
-
Gentlemen: '� '' � r '. .//"," ,;
•
This letter. transmits four copies of our geotechnical engineering
study for your proposed new office/warehouse facility at the
subject site. We proceeded with our services on the basis of
your July 2, 1987 written authorization.
The soils underlying the proposed development area comprise
_ primarily loose soft organic silts, clayey..silts and silty sands
1 : with occassional peat interlayerings at relatively shallow
depths. These materials, which extend to .'a ;depth of about :' :<,'
: seventeen and one-half (17-1/2 ) feet below existinggrade, -are '
highly susceptible to compression under load. This is typically
:.reflected in the form of structure settlement. •
Based on the encountered conditions, and the results of our
analyses, we believe there are two practical and economical means - ,
of supporting the structure available to you. These are:
• to support the structure on conventional footings bearing on •
compacted structural -fill after successful completion of a
preload surcharge program, or
• to support the structure on. a driven timber pile and concrete
grade beam foundation system.
These foundation support alternatives, along with other
geotechnically related aspects of the project are discussed in
more detail in the text of the attached report.
We appreciate this opportunity to have been of service to you
during this initial phase of project, development, and we look
forward to working with you in future phases as the project comes
M1
1805 136th Place N E,Suite 101,Bellevue,Washington 98005 Bellevue(206)643-3780 Seattle(206)464-1584
222 E.26th Street.Suite 103,P.O.Box 111744,Tacoma,Washington 98411.9998 Tacoma(206)272.6608
.
•
Alaska Distributors Company V E-3453
- _August 15, .1987 VV Page Two
•
•
to fruition. In the meantime, should you or your consultants
have any questions about the content of this report, or if we can
be of further assistance, please call.
• Very truly yours,
CONSULTANTS, INC.
N
G1 Mann, P. E. • • •
Vice-President
= - STL/GM/cac - - . .• • . . • • •
•
n • -; •c
• " r n_re. *•"_E •
. -••• • , -
- _ • • - • ' - ••• - -
• , - -
) ' ' s - - • —
• •
- •
•
•
•
-•-
•
•
Earth Consultants, Inc.
• • . .
c
_-. — -_- _- GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
PROPOSED OFFICE/WAREHOUSE
SOUTHWEST 27th STREET
RENTON, WASHINGTON
INTRODUCTION
Project Description .
The subject site is located along the northern side of Southwest :•
27th Street in Renton, Washington approximately as shown on the
Vicinity Map, Plate 1. The purpose of this study is to explore
? the existing subsurface conditions at the site, and on this basis
to develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed site
development. -
The proposed office/warehouse is _to be :,a two-story ::concrete. '.
'masonry building with a slab-on-grade floor. The majority of the
_:. :structure will be constructed on dock-high fills. Approximately
-seven feet of fill will be needed to bring the site to .:its •
, planned elevation and to achieve design floor elevation. Paved
parking, truck 'access and turning area will be provided along the -.
southern and eastern sides of the `building. The area to the
north will be available for future expansion.
According to the structural engineer,f maximum total dead plus
live loads are expected to be as follows:
• Wall loads - 3 kips per lineal foot
• Column loads - 70 to 100 kips
• slab loads - 500 pounds per square foot
(psf)
•
•
A site plan showing the proposed building and approximate boring
locations is presented on Plate 2, Boring Location Plan.
In the event that any changes in the nature, design or location
of this project are made, we should be consulted to review the
recommendations presented in this report. In any case, we
recommend that Earth O0nsultants, Inc. (ECI) be retained to
perform a general review of final design.
Scope of Services
Me performed this study in general accordance with the scope of
services outlined in our June 29, .1987 proposal. On this basis,
our report addresses:
{` _ review of information from a previous Dames and Moore study '` r-
of part of this site, :'
• subsurface ::exploration of site's . ,soil and _groundwater .-:,:I :.
conditions,
selective laboratory
tea -
y tenting to characterize =$ite 'saterials, '+
w foundation support alternatives, including conventional
spread footings and driven timber piles,
• estimated settlement magnitudes and rates,
• site preparation, earthwork and grading operations and
procedures, - • •
• short and long term site drainage and erosion control, and
• appropriate asphalt pavement design section recommendations
•
— 2 —
It
•
This report has been prepared for specific application only to
this project in a manner consistent with that level of care and
skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently
practicing under similar conditions in the area. It is provided
for the exclusive use of Alaska Distributors Company, and their
representatives. No warranty is expressed or implied. We
recommend that this report be included in its entirety in the
project contract documents.
. ... SITE CONDITIONS
Surface
The site is located along the northern side of Southwest 27th
Street in Renton, Washington approximately one mile east 'of the
- Green River in the Green River ':flood `:plain. 'The ..property -i s
• `'bordered on the east byOlympic Pipeline 'mom amy and Mobile Oil ` !-
_
Corporation tank farm facilities, and on the north and west by ~}
undeveloped property covered with grass . and shrubs. .Between the
• site and the tank . farms is _a .moderaterly deep man-made drainage
channel containing Springbrook Creek. t.
t
•
The site is generally level, but is approximately four feet lower
in elevation than the Southwest 27th Street right-of-way. The :"
surface is covered with grasses and by' numerous Madrona and Alder
saplings.
Subsurface
Our exploratory borings encountered three generally distinct soil
stratum (layers) , which are described below:
_ ._ ._._.
- 3 - '
� r
•
I
Stratum "I-Fill: (0 to . 7-1/2 feet) This layer is a fill
predominantly composed -of dense, brown to gray gravelly sand
containing Scattered cobbles. Approximately 10 percent of the
fill material passed
the No. 200 mesh sieve. 'The fill has a
moisture c - -
antent ranging between about 7 to 18 percent, and
is presently firm and competent.
Stratum- II-Silt: (7-1/2 to 17-1/2 feet) This stratum consists
of very soft to soft brown to gray organic silt, clayey silt,
and silty sand with ' interbedded peat. The silt samples
tested exhibit an average moi
•
sture isture content of 48 percent, a
liquid limit of 34 to 68 percent, and a plasticity index of 4
to 8 perceht. The interbedded peat sample tested has an
average woi•
%ture content of 178 percent. These materials are
_ - _highly compressible under load.
Stratum""-IIi-Sand; (17-1/2 to 54 :feet) :This layer comprises -J'`•
: _ primarily �i um dense to: dense gray-black :silty fine sand to '
fine sand. The 'upper fifteen (15) feet of this stratum ..'
contains s%beral thin silt lenses. Below thirty-five (35)
feet shell fragments exist within the soil matrix. This
:;material 4rvears competent to suppo
rt a deep :-.foundation =; • -.�=
system.•
More detailed descriptions of the soil conditions encountered at
the exploratory borrng locations are presented on the individual -
Boring Logs, P13 tes 4 through 8. The details and results of our
field exploratiZn 'and laboratory testing programs are presented
in the appendix,
Groundwater
Groundwater was encountered at depths of about four and one-half
(4-1/2) to seventeen and one-half (17-1/2) feet below the
existing surfac during drilling. " Groundwater levels are not
- 4 - '
static, they fluctuate seasonally and because of changes in
rainfall, surface water runoff, and infiltration. Your
contractor should be prepared for this in the event construction
occurs during the wetter winter months.
In order to more accurately determine these existing site water
levels, slotted three-quarter inch standpipe was installed in
Borings A and D. Water level readings obtained two days after
completion of drilling show the stabilized water level to be
between about 5-1/2 and 6-3/4 feet below the existing surface.
This level approximately matches that in Springbrook Creek to the
east.
DISCUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General
Based on the results of our study, 'it is evident the area Y of
_ -. proposed development is underlain to considerable depth by loose
_ or. soft and highly
g y compressible `soils. ` Because of this we expect
a relatively _ large amount of settlement to ':occur under - the
proposed building loads. In our opinion, there are two practical
and economic means of supporting the proposed structure without
subjecting it : to en intolerable degree of settlement induced
distortion. .. These, `options are to support
the building on
conventional spread footings bearing on compacted structural
after successful completion of a preload surcharge program, or to
support the building on a driven timbar pile and concrete grade
beam foundation system. In the latter case, it is almost certain
the building's floor slab will need to be a structural slab.
The heavily trafficed pavement areas will need to be carefully
prepared to avoid the potential for truck traffic induced damage.
This typically means that in addition to performing some specific
subgrade preparation, a geotechnical fabric and a thicker than
normal pavement section will be required.
- 5 -
{
•
Because of the relatively shallow groundwater level it is
probable you will need to install a carefully designed site
drainage system. We understand the site is also subject to the
City of Renton's shoreline protection requirements, and that
these are presently under study by the Corps of 'Engineers.
Regardless of the designed drain system, you will need to comply
with these revised regulations.
These and other geotechnically related aspects of the project are
discussed -- "in more detail in the following paragraphs of this
report.
Site -Preparation and General Earthwork
- Proposed site grades are approximately three feet higher than the
present surface elevation. In addition, the dock high floor will
require four feet of fill to support it. Fill .-material ,:used to •;
achieve design site elevations should meet the requirements for • f-
structural fill.
Ideally, ' but 'particularly during `wet . weather, --structural ' fill ' = `
should comprise :a free-draining, granular organic free material
with a maximum size of three inches. It should contain less then
- • ' 3 percent fine material (silt and clay size particles passing the
No. 200 mesh sieve biased on the fractfon of the material passing
the No. 4 mesh sieve). During dry weather, any compactible
non-organic soil may be used as structural fill.
Structural fill under floor slabs and footingsshould be placed
in thin horizontal lifts not exceeding ten inches in loose
thickness. Each lift should be compacted to a least 95 percent
of maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM Test Designation
D-1557-78 (Modified -Proctor). • Fill under pavements and walks
- 6 - -
•
•
should be placed in similar thin horizontal lifts and, with the
exception of the upper twelve (12) inches, compacted to at least
90 percent of maximum density. The top twelve (12) inches should
be compacted to at least 95 percent maximum density.
All f ill material should be placed a t or near the optimum
moisture content. If the materials are too wet to be compacted
to the required degree, it will be necessary to dry them or
replace them with a more granular material. Fill materials can
be dried by aeration or by mixing in lime or cement powder to
:absorb moisture. •
Foundations - .
Based on the encountered site conditions and :.the preliminary
building design criteria, we believe two practical and economical
--- _ - 'foundation system
alternatives are ` available 'to support -the 1 '..
proposed structure. 'These alternatives are: _
o conventional spread footings bearing on compacted structural
,..
`�< ; fill .after successful completion ,of a ``preload `surcharge
program, or t _
o Driven timber or predrilled augercast piles and concrete .=
grade beams.
If you elect to use conventional footings, you must perform a
preload surcharge program to induce a significant portion of the
settlements likely to be caused by the proposed construction
loads. The surcharge program is discussed in more detail in a
subsequent paragraph.
Once the preload program is successfully completed, - the
conventional footings can be designed on the basis of the,
following criteria:
•
• Allowable bearing pressure = 2500 psf
• Minimum depth of perimeter footings = 18 inches
• Minimum depth of interior footings = 12 inches below top
of floor slab
• Minimum width of wall footings = 15 inches
• Minimum lateral dimension of column = 24 inches
footings
• Estimated post-surcharge settlement = 1 inch, or less
• Estimated post-surcharge differential = 1/2 inch across
settlement
• - one column bay.
A one-third increase in the above allowable bearing pressures can
be used when considering short term transitionary wind or seismic
loadings.
Lateral loads can also be resisted by friction between the
- foundation and the supporting _ compacted "fill 38ubgrade or by
_passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of the
foundations. Fbr the latter, the foundations must be poured ; _
"neat" against the existing soil. or backfilled with a compacted
fill meeting the requirements of structural fill. A coefficient4
!of friction of .0.35 may be used between the structural foundation
- concrete and the ' supporting subgrade. The passive resistance of :
well compacted fill may be taken as equal to the pressure of a
fluid having a density of three hundred (300) pounds per cubic
foot (pcf) .
•
As a precuationary measure, we recommmend drains be placed around
all perimeter footings. More specific details of perimeter
foundation drains are provided in the Site Drainage Section of
this report.
We have analysed. two pile foundation systems for axial and uplift
capacities. These are a sixteen (16) inch diameter drilled
in-place augercast pile, and a driven nine-inch tip diameter
timber pile. In both cases the depth of penetration below
existing site grade is forty-seven (47) feet. The capacities are
tabulated below:
Axial Uplift
Pile Capacity Capacity -
Type (tons) (tons)
Augercast .25 - 11
Timber .: 20 _ g
Greater axial and uplift capacities can be achieved by enlarging
the pile diameters.
-:. Resistance to lateral loads can be achieved by restraining the
heads of individual piles, and by the stiffness of the piles and
the restraint offered by the soils surrounding the upper portion r ..:
of the piles. :`Additional resistance can be _achieved :by "a
-combination of passive pressures acting on the buried portions of . -, ;; -.
the concrete grade beams and the underlying subgrade. Similar ; ,'
design values to those described above for conventional footings
will apply. For the existing site conditions, we calculate that ;':
`each reinforced augercast pile can resist a lateral load of two
kips and each timber pile one kip applied at the ground surface.
:We recommend your structural engineer verify the structural
integrity of the selected pile system under the above lateral
loads.
For either pile system we estimate individual pile settlements
will be on the order of one-half inch, but the majority of these
settlements are expected to occur as the structural loads are
applied. We believe this magnitude of movement is within the
tolerable limits of the proposed structure.
- 9 -
Dock-High Retaining Walls -
From . our earlier discussions, we understand dock-high retaining
walls will be constructed along the perimeter of the building.
We recommend they be designed to resist any lateral loads imposed
on them. For the existing site conditions we estimate the
lateral soil load to be resisted should be equal to that imposed
by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of forty (40) pcf. If
the wall is prevented from rotating, we recommend adding . a one
hundred (100) psf uniform surcharge over the full wall height. ''''::. '
y •These values assume that no vehicular, floor or other surcharge _
loads will act on the wall. If such surcharges are to apply,
they should be added to the above design lateral pressures.
We assume that the walls will be backfilled with a suitable -free
drainingmaterial. Typically, "'- ' --
yp y, wall backfill should consist 'of =,
�,tti.
materials similar to structural= fill.- - `Wall backfill shouldhave ''Z', -: .
a maximum size of three inches, be organic free, -:and have a ':' =
maximum of 3 percent fines (materials passing the No. 200 mesh ` ``:``
sieve) . 'Twenty-five (25) to seventy (70) percent of.
. the ---
particles should pass the No. 4 mesh sieve. ;,A typical wall drain k •.." ,`'
detail is provided as Plate 13. :.
_As an alternative to free-draining wall backfill, you may wish to
consider the use -.of a geotextile drainage product such - as
"Miradrain". In either case, we recommend the installation of a'
drain line along the base of each wall. These drains are
discussed in more detail in the Site Drainage section of this
report.
Slab-on-Grade Floors
Slab-on-grade floors can be used with conventional foundations
providing a preload surcharge ..... program is satisfactorily
completed and the slab is supported on compacted structural fill.
- 10 -
•
Any fill or native soils disturbed by construction activity
should either be recompacted :or excavated and replaced with
compacted structural fill "or crushed rock. To avoid moisture
build-up on the subgrade, the slab should be provided with a
capillary break consisting of a minimum of four inches of free
draining sand and gravel. We also recommend that a vapor
barrier, such as a 6 mil plastic membrane, be placed beneath the
slab, but over the capillary break, to reduce both water vapor
• transmission through the slab and the resultant moisture related
damage to interior furnishings. Two to four inches of sand or
pea gravel may be plated over the membrane for protection during
construction, to aid in curing of the concrete, and to help
, prevent cement paste bleeding -down into the underlying capillary
break.
We also recommend the floor slab be _"free-floating" so that ';:_:
.future differential settlement between floor slabs, columns or -
,walls will not be reflected in the form of warped or cracked 'w!• :•-5
;floor slabs ,..�
If a pile foundation system is selected, we believe it will be
necessary to design and construct :a structural floor :slab -to `,';:� '.•:
•:' -accommodate the relatively high expected floor loads. "'However, •
`,- r. it may be possible to simplify the slab construction by building _
up the dock-high fill so that it can act as formwork on which to
•
-pour the slab. Once the floor slab concrete reaches its design =
strength, the continued subgrade support becomes unnecessary. .
Therefore, if the fill subgrade were to settle, it will not have -
a detrimental affect on the building floor slab. We understand
your structural engineer has already performed a preliminary
design of just such a floor slab. -
Preload Surcharge Program
If you elect to use conventional footings to support your
proposed building, you will need-to- perform a preload surcharge
11 -
program to preinduce as much of the settlement likely to be
caused by the building loads as possible. To accomplish this
goal, we recommend you place at least five feet of preload
material over the compacted structural fill required to raise the
building area grade to the proposed dock-high elevation. We also
recommend you add sufficient compacted structural fill to allow
for the estimated preload induced settlement, about twelve (12)
inches. Based on the subsurface and laboratory test information
presently available to us, we estimate this settlement should
take about thirty (30)- days to complete.
•
Preload material has no specific criteria, unless it is to be - ..
used as structual fill elsewhere on the site, except that it -
•
should have an in-place unit weight of no less than one hundred
-and twenty (120) pcf. We recommend the preload extend at least
five feet beyond the southern, eastern and western perimeters of • .-t';_ •
of the building, and at least ten feet beyond the •northern
_ - ^perimeter. From _this point the fill should be sloped at a
gradient of 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical). The additional distance
jat the northern end is to help compensate for potential effect
of future construction should you elect to construct an additions•
in that area. We also 'suggest as a precautionary measure, that
you "roll" the surcharge onto the area of the potential future
addition to preinduce settlements on this area too. This will
help to reduce, if not eliminate, the affects of future
development on this structure.
You should also consider extending the preload over the parking
lot area as described in the Pavement Areas section of this
report.
Because this preload fill is to cause settlement, it is necessary
to monitor both the magnitude and rate of such settlement. To
accomplish this, we recommend you install a series of at least
eight settlement monitors over —the building area. These
- 12 -
settlement monitors should be placed on the existing site
subgrade before any fill is placed. A typical settlement monitor
is pictorially depicted on Plate 12, attached. Once installed,
and while the fill is being placed and compacted, as necessary, _
the movements caused by the filling operation should be recorded.
Baseline readings should be obtained as soon as the markers are
installed, then readings should be acquired periodically
throughout the filling and on through the subsequent weeks until
either settlements cease, or the geotechnical engineer is -
satisfied the settlements are within the tolerable limits of the
proposed building. The readings obtained during the early
filling operation are typically critical and should be taken at
hourly to daily intervals, depending on the progress of the
filling operation. The later readings can be obtained on a
;weekly or even bi-weekly basis. For continuity, we recommend you •�
retain ECI to perform the settlement monitoring services. How- -
ever, if you ::,elect to use some other entity,Y. �we strongly
recommend you provide the data to ECI for review and reduction as
Vrquickly after its acquistion as possible. This will tend to help
:reduce the potential for misunderstanding or misinterpretation of
the data
;.•,�,. , .: � .=Excavations and Slopes
•
While no major excavations or slope construction efforts are
anticipated in construction, you should' be aware that in no case •
should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in
local, state and national government safety regulations.
Temporary cuts greater than four feet in height should be sloped
at an inclination no steeper than 1H:1V. If slopes of this
inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, or if excavations
greater than four feet in depth are required, temporary shoring
may be necessary. This shoring will help protect against slope
or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workmen in
- 13 -
•
the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be
available to provide geotechincal shoring design criteria, if
requested. _
Site Drainage
Two days after completion of our borings, recorded groundwater in
Borings D and A were 5.5 and 6.8 feet below the existing site
surface, respectively. - :Since site and building elevations are
to be raised about three and seven feet, respectively, we do not ti .• .
expect the site groundwater levels will "present any major
construction related problems. however, the site ' should be
graded such that surface water is directed off the site. Water
should not be allowed to stand in any area where buildings, slabs
or pavements are to be constructed. During construction, loose
.surfaces should be sealed at night by compacting the surface
soils to reduce ::.the infiltration of rain into the soils.-:• .:Final -
site grades should allow for drainage away from the ;building`'
foundations. We suggest that the ground be sloped at a gradient • .
of 3 percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the
• - :.buildings except in areas that are to be paved.
•
If seepage is encountered in foundation or grade beam -excavations
during construction, we recommend your contractor slope the
bottom of the excavation to one or more shallow sump pits. The
collected water can then be pumped from these pits to a positive
and permanent discharge, such as a nearby storm drain. Depending. '
on the magnitude of such seepage, it may also be necessary to
interconnect the shallow sump pits by a system of shallow
connector trenches.
If conventional spread footings are used, we recommend you
-install footing, drains around the building perimeter. These
drains should consist of a four inch minimum diameter perforated
or slotted rigid plastic drain pipe laid at, or just below, the
— 14 —
•
invert of the footing with a gradient sufficient to initiate
flow. The drain line should be bedded on, surrounded by, and
covered with a free-draining washed rock, pea gravel or other
free-draining granular material.
Once the drains are installed, with the exception the upper
twelve (12) inches, the excavation can be backfilled with a
granular fill material. The surficial twelve (12) inches of fill
should consist of compacted and relatively impermeable soil. It
can be separated from -the underlying more granular drainage
material by a layer of building paper or visqueen. The surface
should be sloped to '.drain away from the building wall.
Alternatively, the surface can be sealed with asphalt or concrete -.
paving.
Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be
connected to the footing drain system. All roof downspouts must
be separately tightined " to discharge. We recommend you install
sufficient cleanouts at strategic locations to allow for periodic
maintenance of the footing drain and downspout tightline systems.
'If subsurface drains -appear to be necessary once construction is
underway, we recommend the appropriate locations of subsurface
drains, if needed, be established during grading operations by
ECI's representative, at which time the seepage areas, if •
present, may be more clearly defined.
Pavement Areas
Because of the relatively high risk of fill induced settlements
on this site, and the apparent need to subject a considerable..
portion of the eastern side of the site to regular heavy truck
traffic, we believe long term settlements could have a
detrimental affect on the site pavements. Approximately three
- 15 -
feet of compacted structural fill will be required to achieve the
proposed design site grade. This fill alone will cause some
settlement to occur. Once a pavement is installed and the heavy
trucks begin to use the area, the pavement is likely to undergo a
wide variety of differential settlements. Over a relatively
short time this should result in pavement damage and a need for
expensive maintenance.
To mitigate or eliminate these potential settlement affects we
recommend you surcharge 'the heavily trafficed areas of the site ,
at the same time the building surcharge is in place, or during
_ pile driving and grade beam construction. The pavement area
j surcharge need only consist of about two feet of material, and
the only requirement is that the material have a unit weight of
one hundred and twenty (120) pcf. ante estimate a surcharging
period of about forty-five (45) days will • be adequate ` to
preinduce settlements in this area.
_
Once the surcharge is removed, the subgrade ` must be moisture
;conditioned, as necessary, and the :upper twelve .:112) inches
•:' recompacted` to at= least 95: percent compaction (per ASTM '
- := D-1557-78). Below this level, 90
_. . • ._, percent =compaction should be ..:
adequate. It is
q possible that somelocalized areas of soft, wet - _
or unstable subgrade may still exist after this process. If so,
they may require overexcavation of the unsuitable materials and '
their replacement with a compacted structural fill or •a crushed
rock. Depending on the nature of the prepared subgrade at the
time of construction, it may also be necessary to use a
geotechnical fabric to separate pavement materials from the
underlying subgrade and to help strengthen the pavement section.
We have provided you with two alternative pavement sections for
the lightly trafficed staff access and parking areas, and for the
more heavily trafficed truck access and loading areas. In the
more lightly loaded areas we recommend the following:
- 16 -
• two inches of Asphalt Concrete (AC) surfacing over four
inches of Crushed Rock Base (CRB) material, or -
• two inches of AC over three and one-half inches of Asphalt
Treated Base (ATB) material.
Because of the general nature of the site soils, and because
construction is likely to be conducted in the wetter winter
months, we recommend you select the ATB pavement section. This
will not only provide you with a competent "blacktop" surface
that will help protect the site from construction activity, but
will also provide a clean, dry and competent surface on which to
store and protect construction materials. It has also been our
experience that in spite of its slightly higher initial ,cost,
, this form of surfacing requires considerably less . -maintenance
:either during
or afters winter construction -period, _ _ _ _
While the use of CRB offers little advantage over the ATB from
the structural viewpoint, it is significantly more susceptible to
"deterioration and expensive maintenance during winter use. ' .In .: ;
numerous instances this can even lead to the need for replacement •
•
of the CRB before paving can be accomplished because construction
:traffic has forced the CRB down into the underlying subgrade.
Although the use of a geotextile will help prevent such
separation and contamination of the CRB, you will have to pave•
over it before the building can be opened. With the ATB, it is
possible to stripe and mark the material and to use it as the
"pavement" so the building can be marketed. The ATB can be left _
undisturbed in-place for one or more seasons until the great
majority of settlement-related movement has an opportunity to
occur. Once this has occurred, any necessary maintenance can be
performed and the AC surfacing installed. This should allow you
to avoid the need for . any significant pavement surfacing
maintenance.
- 17 -
•
For the heavier truck traffic areas we have made some assumptions +:
about site usage, pavement life and site traffic. We assumed the
pavement life to be twenty
(20) years, that truck traffic would
be confined to one lane in each direction, and that traffic would
double within the pavement life. We estimated the pavement
subgrade would have an equivalent "R-Value"• of about sixty (60) .
On the basis of these estimated criteria we used . the State of
Washington Flexible Pavement Design Method to determine a
sutiable pavement design section. As a result of this analysis,
• we recommend the following.
e Three inches of AC over six inches of CRB, or - -
e Three inches of AC over four inches of ATB = •
• In either case we suggest the pavement section be separated from = : :.r,
the prepared subgrade by a Mirafi 500X geotechnical -fabric, •br-- - 1
equivalent. -
If the above design assumptions appear incorrect to you, or If ;z: ; :;,
you have more detailed and accurate criteria, please .provide the
information to _'us so that we can reanalyze these heavier pavement
sections. If we are not provided further data, we will assume
`-'these data in our analysis to be correct. _- •
LIMITATIONS : . . ._:; _ _
Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site - -
conditions and materials observed, and selective laboratory
testing and engineering analyses. The conclusions and
recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner
consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised _
by members of the profession currently practicing under similar
conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied. -
•
18
•
•
The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the
data obtained from our exploratory borings. Soil and groundwater
conditions between borings may vary from those encountered.
However, the nature and extent of variations between borings may
not become evident until construction. If variations then
appear, ECI should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations
contained in this report, and to verify or modify them in writing
prior to proceeding with the construction.
*Additional -Services •
• . We recommend ECI be retained to perform a general review of the
final design plans and specifications to verify that the =,
earthwork and foundation recommendations ::have been properly
interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction
.:specifications.
_ _ - _ - - - •
•
We also 'recommend :ECI be retained to provide :geotechnical -
_ services during construction. Because : :of the settlement
sensitive nature of this project, we do not accept responsibility
for the performance -of the foundation or earthwork unless we are
retained to review the construction drawings and specifications, {
-' ; and to provide construction observation and testing services.
This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifica-
tions or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event •
i.
subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the,
start of construction. .
19 -
•
•
•
The following plates are attached and complete this report:
Plate 1 Vicinity Map
Plate 2 Boring Location Plan
Plate 3 Legend
Plates 4 through 8 Boring Logs
Plate 9 Grain Size Analyses
Plates 10 and 11 Consolidation Test Data
Plate 12 _ _ Typical Detail of Settlement
- -•. Markers • • r i.
_ - Plate 13 ' : Retaining Wall Drainage and
$ackfill : .
" Respectfully submitted, •
= EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC
kizielefrt. - r.
Sheldon
Lynne
E 'veering Geologist
Glen an _
n, P. -E. -
Vice-President
STL/GM/cac •
z
•
•
•
- 20 - .
• APPENDIX A
FIELD EXPLORATION AND_ LABORATORY -TESTING
Our field exploration was performed on July 7 and 8, 1987.
Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling five
borings to a maximum depth of fifty-four (54) fee.t below the
existing grade. The borings were drilled by Pacific Testing
Laboratories using a truck-mounted rotary drill rig. Continuous
flight, hollow stem augers - were used to advance and support the
boreholes during sampling. - •
The approximate locations of the borings were determined by
measuring -from the southeast property corner using a nylon
measuring tape. Elevations of borings were determined using a
hand level with respect to a temporary bench mark, :the curb on
the north side of Southwest 27th Street, as the datum. The curb ::
_ - elevation :was assumed to `;be 0.0 feet. The ,_locations and , -!':
'` elevations of the borings should be considered accurate only to
the degree implied by the method used. These approximate ,
locations are shown on the Boring Location Plan, Plate 2. :.:;::_-
• ;The field exploration was continuously `:'monitored : by -an .:: ;: :
engineering geologist from our firm who classified the soils
encountered and maintained a log of each boring, obtained
representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed
pertinent site feafures. Slotted standpipes were installed to • - ` .
the bottoms of Borings A and D to monitor groundwater levels on a
long term basis, if required. All samples were visually
classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification
System which is presented on Plate 3, Legend. Logs of the
borings are presented on Plates 4 through 8. The final logs
represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results
of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The
•
- 21 - - - .
•
- stratification lines on the -logs represent the approximate
boundary between soil types. . In actuality, the transitions may
be either more gradual or more severe.
In each boring, Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed
at selected intervals in general accordance with ASTM Test Desig-
nation D-1586. The split spoon sampler was driven with a one
hundred forty (140) pound hammer freely falling thirty (30)
inches. In addition, a Shelby tube sampler was used to obtain
less disturbed soil samples at selected depths. The number of
blows required to drive the sampler for the last twelve (12)
inches, or portion thereof, is called the EN-Value". This value
is :used to help characterize the site materials and in
performance of some engineering analyses.
ODmpressive strengths of undisturbed soils were measured where : .
_. .:.practical in the field with a band penetrometer. These results .-
are recorded 'a t.:the appropriate sample depths :on the individual l,L' -.:-
- - - - boringlogs. .. _
_
-
Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and ` •
returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing.
Visual classifications were supplemented by index tests such as
sieve .'analyses on :`representative samples. ' -M+loisture determina-
tions were performed on all samples. Results of moisture deter-
minations, together with classifications, are shown at the
appropriate depth on the boring logs ' included in this report. ='''
The results of two sieve analyses are illustrated on Plate 9,
Grain Size Analyses.
Two consolidation tests were conducted on relatively undisturbed
representative samples from the Shelby tube sampler to evaluate
the consolidation characteristics of the site soils. In
addition, time, readings were taken at several points of loading
to evaluate the time rate of settlement. The results of these
tests are shown on Plates 10 and 11, consolidation Test Data.
- 22 -
•
stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate
boundary between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may -�,
be either more gradual or more severe.
In each boring, Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed
at selected intervals in general accordance with ASTM Test Desig-
nation D-1586. The split spoon sampler was driven with a one
hundred forty (140) pound hammer freely falling thirty (30)
inches. In addition, a Shelby tube sampler was used to obtain
less disturbed soil samples at selected depths. The number of
( blows required to drive the sampler for the last twelve (12) ),
inches, or portion thereof, is called the "N-Value". This value
l ue
is used to help characterize the site materials and in
performance of. some engineering analyses.
Compressive strengths of undisturbed soils were measured where --
_practical in the field with a hand penetrometer. These results
are recorded at the appropriate sample depth's on the individual
boring logs. = --
Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and
,returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. `:.,
_ Visual classifications were supplemented b 'T..`.
PP y Index tests such - as ,:-
': sieve analyses on -representative samples. Moisture determina-
tions were performed on all samples. Results of moisture deter-
minations, together with classifications, are shown at the - `�: .
appropriate depth an the boring logs- included in this report.
The results of two sieve analyses are illustrated on Plate 9,
Grain Size Analyses.
Two consolidation tests were conducted on relatively undisturbed
representative samples from the Shelby tube sampler to evaluate
the consolidation characteristics of the site soils. In
addition, time readings were taken at several points -of loading
to evaluate the time rate of settlement. The results of these
tests are shown on Plates 10 and ii,--Consolidation Test Data.
- 22 -
S.
•
__ E , : ,\. - i ' 1iI 1 *:.®.•'1 • _...
,.t ..IryTi...,- i\ • ; .w ..
oicrX
.. -r lJ it ,o �„• •.; r 20 0 s
_ t 1 Nur rt. ri .i
e
.
• ,, .t
•iniinher4.:10..S'..1'.LI ".: .� E N 1; 0 N ;: a"° ',JP R
. 1
• HI AEI 1 y p -�_• .,.•s,e ■r . .n -1. r•-�.,
:,r. ::rcwi' i.w"'__ f�TON ' -.'': i ! `.a �� �,4; .:. ..i.a
11' E
.:=r �� tom•W. - -- — !Rt ill•
��•. r I •25:fmr• w.n. 1 w11� .r
C�r lr • si�rE _ .
f 11.1.sue _ '
t II st)1RIfT
n:°'i:" a s /�� 'SW r —7— I li:T�srs tun'tr. i- -- ar •--•
�drP. I _11,1 . ,ti ..„-s....
t 14 ; u. . III
.....:,.-. WO.VC II 55 li .-,-:• . . . a 4
.g all
e a 1. '�,"+`' ■�.a _
+,
a < ;
4.
3 + - 36 t j '3, 31 -- ---� 321' �'
_ gg. s -a r !rM j sr ge
.,> to -. ,
11 1' : -N. s
. _ - MIN - n w ! �?�r1 Atw lap,Jr,, > / _ ! 190rw .• .
i j, n r ITN 1. • v ,», Ada
r s. .
•
•
Cl•
Reference :
•
• King County/ Mop 41 •
By Thomas Brothers Mops
5, Doted 1986
s.
.• • Vicinity Mop . _~: _
Earth i I
Proposed Warehouse
Consultants Inc.` i . Renton, Washington
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING I GEOLOGY Proj.No. 3453 I Date July 187 I Plate
r-
11:
: Yr 10 .
•
1 Approximate Scale
— aaa� aaa�aae,—MEM____ aaaE MUM aaa=aaaI '_ —
0 50 100
200ft.
B-E ! i I f LEGEND
I
I
B'A Approximate Location of
ECI Boring, Proj. No.
I--
B-C E-3453, July 1987
W I I
PROPOSED WAREHOUSEI ± ® Approximate Location of
cr
FUTURE ADDITION
Dames a Moore Boring,
Job No. 10292-OO2-05,
I
ti ( Jan. 15, 1982
N I
3 I i Proposed Building
•ui
in
U . 11 Proposed Future Addition
r _1
l I 1) ' Reference :
• Site Plan
By AI Goodfellow, Architect 8 Engineer
. I j
' Dated 5/5/87
1
Property Line :, � 1+. ��' `
' I" Earth
Consultants
s and c..ti.g,
Boring Location Plan
Proposed Warehouse
Renton, Washington
No. 3453
. _ Proj. Date July 1 87 Plate 2
•i
•
•
MAJOR DIVISIONS • GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTION
SYMBOL SYMBOL
Gravel :11 .4 f GW Well-Graded Gravels.Gravel-Sand
And Clean Gravels re:.....:...'.'... gw Mixtures.Little Or No Fines
Gravelly (little or no fines) :O. :0: :•: . Gp .. Poorly-Graded Gravels,Gravel-
Coarse Soils • • • ' • ' t / Sand Mixtures Little Or No Fines.'•'yp*�, - gp
Soils More Than
50 Coarse Gravels With M ■ • GM Silty G avels.
Co r y
gm Silt MixturesFines(appreciableNeta red On amount o1 fines) GC/ Clayey Gravels.Gravel Sand
No d Sieve
gc Clay Mixtures
0 ° ° oo ° .�
• Sand o o °°.°°,°, SW Well-Graded Sams Gravelly
And Clean Sand .a.°o °O.°o �-�SW Sands. Little Or No Fines -
' Sandy 1 little or no fines) i Ott,c
More Than Sods • SP / Poorly-Graded Sands. Gravelly
50'. Material - Sp Sands Little Or 'No Fines .
Larger Than Mor T ^,• t�
No 200 Sieve a Than
50°° Coarse SM sm
Silty Sands. Sand Silt Mixtures
Size Sands With
Fraction Fines(appreciableWA,.Passing No.1 .S/
- Sieve amount of fines) SC Clayey Sands. Sand-Clay Mixtures
mi. Inorganic Silts&Very Fine Sands.Rock Flour.Silty- ;'
,// /% nil Clayey Fine Sands-Clayey Silts w'Slight Plasticity t`'
Grained And Fine Liquid Limit Silts ���rC1 CI
Inorarvgaellny Clays Ssic Clays O'n Lov:G To Medium Plasstc•t)Leap.
Soils Clays - Less Than 50 GaysS. ilty Clay
OL Organic Silts And Organic
. / . 01 Shy Clays Ot Low Piastcdy •.•'
i
MH Inorganic Silts.Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fine
- More Than ,. . : 'i-.. - ..• . '.'..- j)
50'� Material tTth Sand Or Silty Soils
Smaller Than Silts Liquid Limit
No 200 Sieve And t Greater Than 50 CH Inorganic Clays Of High
Size Clays CIl Plasticity. Fat Clays
t ' •' I/ O Organic Clays Of Medium To High
� /� On Plashcdy,Organic Silts
i: ,•••x: Highly Organic Soifs - .A
-•— PT • Peat. Humus. Swamp Soils - -
- - pt With High Organic Contents
•
Topsoil . • Humus And Duff Layer . ' .
' . - I*Ir. - •- - .
Fill •q•0•."P•• - Highly Variable Constituents -
v' ► •♦••••••
z• - The Discussion In The Text 01 This Report Is Necessary For A Proper Understanding
r Of The Nature Of The Material Presented In The Attached Logs
. ;
` 1 ' Notes:-• = `.. ' '
• Dual symbols are used to indicate borderline soil classification.Upper . . •
• case letter symbols designate sample classifications based upon lab-
oratory testing;Jower case letter symbols designate classifications not .
verified by laboratory testing. - .
• I 2"0.D. SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER C TORVANE READING, tsf
SHE I.D. RING SAMPLER OR qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf •
II SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER
P SAMPLER PUSHED W MOISTURE. percent of dry weight •
SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED pcf DRY DENSITY,pounds per cubic ft.
2 WATER LEVEL (DATE► LL LIQUID LIMIT,percent
aWATER OBSERVATION WELL PI PLASTIC INDEX '
''i ii 111)# LEGEND
Consultants Inc. '
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No.3453 Date Julyt87 Plate 3
1
. . . . • . .. .
• • • • '
% • .
. • .•
• . .
. ,
- • BORING NO: A . . .:
• •
. .
. .
Logged By_ELL._. .-- •- ---- - -- • -
. •
-5"± *
•
Date 7-7'87 '
• •
(N)
US •
. VI/
Graph cs Soil Description Depth Sample Blows
. •. . -
. .
*4‘• . • .
. IAN: 1/2" topnoil . .
'400M SW- Gray gravelly SAND with scattered -
1 48 7
•••-••AO
.
104040 SM cobbles, moist, dense (fill)
••••• .-- 5 • i 26 14 •
•
•
• • . PUSH 225
• • ' I .
ml Brownish-gray clayey SILT with scattered 105Z
I PUSH 115 LL=46
organic matter, moist, soft
PUSH 54 PI= 8
-..-,„-i.•
• Gray sandy SILT, wet, loose . - I
. .
. .
15
• -. .
. . -
. .-
• . . •
23 •• - 35 •• • ',..
.•
•
.• •!.:-:::-;•:•:•;•1.: . • 24 • ,- •
:,:;:•:1:1:,:.:0:.:•: . • - • . .
- - • -
— 20 • '-1:-...:,•:,
' -- W*;::* sin Black fine SAND, wei, medium dense ... •„. •
. • . •
. -:.k.':NTMy. :•:!:!:!...?...rt:': • • . - : . .• ' . . ow •
Na:7 -tr-Scrrgh7:15-65iFf-Cgray interlayered clayey-
I 8 53 qu=0.25tsf
B 1:1 lit, SILT, organic silt & sand, wet, very soft... 25
. ..•• . . .... ••
...; .., . .
Black fine to medium SAND, wet, medium •
,..t.k.Y.::,:-.: sm
- dense • - • - - ••• : - • •- •-
20 28
. . .
• 2 --'• •
ii1:::::h;1:::t: ••* . . . • - '.. :: . • . .. . . .. , - . :: z.•:••• • - 30 .
,
:::/:;11:::::::!: • .. . .. ' -
• - - - .
' .- - ••••.'.,..:.I: ' ...-1- * :. . 3± :: 24 '-•--.,.:.f. -4,...-
sin Gray clayey SAND, Nt& very soft, with • - .7711-: •:. .-:... „.. . . .-C: •-':; '.'. 7'...'
-,6.44i+:44- •---
:,: :• ' •-• scattered gravel - 35 ,1.`,... -.. • ...- -' r', • _ .....
_ •:-N-:1-t.:...4 - . '
• •.. .._......,
- •,!-- .
7. :•:.:•:.:,:e.,:t:.t. I .Gray silty SAND with shell fragments, : . • 14- - 21
..:,..t.,...t.,•,.t: wet, medium dense - --7 _ - -.-- .-.
.. _ .
• ,..,..J...:.*:. -,. •: . -
- - - - 40
•:-:-::1-;•;..-,•,-.•
• ... -
-• , t. . ,-. --. : .,. .- ..• . .
',:'' :.:,:,..:.:.•,:.:1:•: . . • • ,
-•
:::::::::::::::1-t-:- • •
• * -
••,. _
. ..
. - -
16 22
' .• _
. . .
. .
. .
. '. Boring terminated at 44 feet below existing grade. . Groundwater
encountered at 9.5 feet during drilling. 1" PVC standpipe* installed j, :..,-'• .
•
,..' • 1 to bottom of boring. Lower 10 feet slotted. Boring backfilled with
cuitings. , • --
•
• •
• • .• •
Water level on 7-9-87 was 6.8 feet. - ' . .
• . * Vertical datum unknown. Elevations determined with respect to a . .
•
temporary bench mark, the top of the north side of Southwest 27th Street, at an assumed elevation of 0.0 feet.
• . .
. .
- • .
•
. .
• . •-1-. .
subsurtace conditions depicted represent our obsenosions at the time and location of this exptoratory hde modified by engineering tests.analysis.and • .
judgement They ere not necessarily representative of otter times and locations We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
information presented on this log
. .
. .
•....41;- • . BORING LOG• i'. k •.::1
Earth • • PROPOSED WAREHOUSE • . : • .,..-'
. . . _
. • 4•, RENTON, WASHINGTON
il .
Consultants Inc. -
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING &GEOLOGY Proj. No. 3453 I Date July'87 'Plate 4
•
•• ;',,_ • . .
• .
..-
•. . •
• .
-• . .
• •
•
0" . .
. . .
_ .
. BORING NO. ' B , • .
.
. . .. . _._ . .. ... . __.
. _ . . . ...,_ .. _ .
Logged By STL ... -• _ .. -- . r. •
• - ELEV. -'
• .-
Date 7-8-87 - - •
• _ . • . - - • .
• . . •
US . (N)
W
Graph cs - . Soil Description .. D(eftp.t)h Sample Blows
Ft. • (%)_
1/2" sod . - ' - • "
0.0.:•:•:•:•:
. 00 :•:•:••••• -
.0 ,w....x. sw- Tan gravelly silty SAND with scattered .
38 9 • . •
0 . ,•:•:•:•:•:
. Sin cobbles, dry • -
. : 00 .:: * - 5
Moist below 11 , gray below 2.5' :I: 6 18
qu=1.0tsf
Brownish-gray organic SILT, moist, . :I: 3 85 LL=68
. .
/////, oh medium stiff . ' • . - 10 48 PI= 6
I
- 123.;
///// PUSH
---• /////
• . •
•
. '..... //// .• Interbedded with peat .11' to 14' . - I PUSH . 252
„y, • -• . '
. .
',..
.. • ///42, : .. . . .. .
.. - 15 . - 42 . "--. -; ' . z.•
.•
_ .- • .
- - -
/ . . . •
• SZ ' . .
r..• ::.::.:*:::.:.: . . . • . , • 1 16 29
ml- Interbedded gray clayey SILT and black . • . • -',.::: .'. •
- 20 . . •
sm . -silty SAND, wet, medium dense . • . . .
- •
. . .
::::•Z -.- - . . . - • .•.-.-. .
. :x,x.: - •
.• . . , . -. .. . . „., -
- • --- • . * . 1 16 28 •-:--,.-•- •
_. „.. .,:.•
- :::::::::; • . • • .•
- • .
. .•
- 25. - •:.:: , .
.. . .
.•
- -•;•:•:•;4 .• .
. . - ••• _- .:-.--
_. • . _.. • ..,.... ,. , .
:Ye!Y •
, •:•:•••' .
7 . • I,- ... . - •, ••• • • ..•.• . ' - '.- . -. . " .
- • ••••••,....._ ....-----.—..- .—...........
•r•-•
......
...,
ml' Gray SILT,' non-plastic, dense, wet,:c :I:
“ _
1
layer clayey SILT @ 28 5' - .. -.-'. -. 30 . .-.-,
. .Y.:•.'...T. - 1 ._.-..- . .. . ... r --..:::17- , ..,T.: • 12 . -,:-'• 23 '-.1.•:-.::: _t-•:. -- .
. . .
-:- - •:..v.:.x.....:•: : -.
Grayish-black silty fine to medium-- --:-
.:•••••:•:•:•:.:•:•:
. . .•;. ::::.I.:::::::::::::;: . . • SAND, wet, medium densesin -. .: ', •-•:.. _ ...--, • . . ••-.. :•:•1•:•:•:•:•:•:•:-
:_y_. ..
, • • • • - - 17 _ 24 • - :-
. . • :.::-.•. :::::-:.::::t.::::::. . . , With shell fragments below 37.5' -.. ,.. . • • -
•::::::::::::::::::: .
.• 40
:, •:.--- -- - " - - .
. .
. :::::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:- •• ••s • .,.. . • . . . . . T 21 21 .-f.i.-': :- •
•.•:•:•:.:•:.:.:•:•: - - . ..
.• .
. . - ' •
-.:!-:•!....4....:.,...... . •
. . - •
• .: ..-.. Boring terminated at 44 feet below existing grade. Groundwater
• -.. . encountered at 17 feet during drilling. Boring backfilled with •
7ik . cuttings.
11
' - ; '
' •- --;. - . . _ . ' -:
. . . • ,
•
... . .
' ' • '
- . . •
• -
•
•
• - • . . . . .
• .
•
. .
. _
•
. •
•
. • . .
• •
Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location Cl INS exploratory hole.modified by engineering tests.analysis.and ludgement They are Viol nocessonly reprosentanni 01 Othei times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for Me use or interpretation by Others 01 information presereed on the log . .
_ay. •
.-er.
- • • -.•
• • • . • - :' BORING LOG . •
. .• . . 1,. - z„ .., .
' .• • • i 14 /111)% .- .',:L --- -- ' . - P.ROPOSED WAREHOUSE - - -------r`t•--__ --,-
RENTON, WASHINGTON
Earth .•: ' i •
Consultants Inc. - '- '. .
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING &GEOLOGY • Proj. No. 3453 I Date • July'87 'Plate 5
. .
. .
• -. .
• •- . .
• • • . •
• . • .•
•
. .
,.
••
• • BORING NO. , C.
. •
•
..._ ... . • .
Logged By STL .•
: • • • ..
.• . • •
- . .., ... .
• • ELEV. -VI
• •
. ;,.., Date 7'8'87 • . • .• . .
• -
• US Depth (N)
W ' •
Graph cs . . Soil Description (ft.) Sample Blows
. .
' .
, . .
.
SW- Gray gravelly SAND with scattered .
10
35 '
sm cobbles,' moist, medium dense (fill) . •
,•
.. - 5 11 15
' .
, .
YJIII ol Brown organic clayey SILT, wet
.. vi , t.. • :I: ' 2 . 67 qu=0.5tsf
•
•. . . . . .
' . - 10 PUSH 46
, Gray sandy and clayey.SILT, wet, ' - :I: . •
•• . _
soft•‘• .:, • .
.:t.•
.. . •
- 1 ' 2 • 46 ,-- ,. • -.,.
.,.•
. - • •-• ' • - - •
. - . • .
. . .
... .
•
- 15 . • - • ..
•••
. . •. • . .• • . . .
•
- ' Si - ----- 51 • -'' -
•
• .
-• ..... . . .
L.I_ -•.:' 39 , -.'-•• ::' ' *
,:•C:'...,• •--' . . .
. . • .
• . • ..-;.-- ":4:':': •••• Gray-black silty fine SAND, wet, loose - 20 .. ._.
".•:•:•:, . -.. _ ... , •.,..
•--• -.. - . . •
.'i, •••:•:.:
ir....... sm- Medium dense" @ 22.5'--..'• ': • ••• • '..' •..• • . - '• . • • .,. . .
ml _ .. . . '22 - 30 ' i•- ' •
. . . . .
. .
11::::::: . • . ,.,..-
i•:::::: . . With .sandy SILT seams and wood fragments—. 25
" N..i: '. •
. .
. ..:- - el 27.5' ••• : :-•;-... - - ' ..- '. :- - .,.,_ • -1 ....
.....,:,: ' , .. . . ., ... .... •., ,.,... . ..
. . ::::,:i:. -. • • .,'• ',••'.-.'• •:•`••••.. .'...-'-' ....--:::';'••••• •, - ,-'''':•-. ' ',. -:._-:,' . I.... . .. , .. .7 .,
.0 • , 1.1:::I. •
30 . . ,..,. •
-' - • • - --- - - '
.; :. '. ;:i•-•;:i.:41:1:;:',: -. ..- -••• • .•-.. ..,- ,--,...-.. ---..r •--__• ..c•-••.: ., _. •. - :,:,..-:' • .. -. - --: -..- ... - ...---,•-•,:.•-i---• ... r •,-..:---:-.:_,..:.-„,•,. .
, !:::::if4-1:4:: • -F.:- -•:.:•• - ---• . ----• ---%••• ••-..,- ., -'.-.-:---- • ." •.--'-'-- -'-. . ''..:----,i-:-.. •• .T. -:, • 3.8. .,.,- 22 - :...:::;::.-4i..,:;:r:•''2.... . .
-;i . • i:i::::0:1+1- .-' Blac:k silty fine to medium SAND, wet, - .• •-.:-. : r
:::::::::':1:;:;•••1: - mediumdense '.---.*:.• :.- ..',..-,-..-. ..:.• 7-, • : ... .-- 35 • - .
•_ .
, ..-::•• i:"......1:,:i:i:::::::
-- •
•:•:-.1:1:,:i:1:•:•: •• , .
-- • :•-• - . .... • •••-•• • T . .-.
..,. . , .
W,-,1-:•ve • With shell fragments below 37.51 . 14 23. : : •
:.-.., _
..,.,:ext.•:,....:. Sm
.• . •.,- .,.. ..,.;..• .
•
!:;:::1:1:e:1*.i::: • •• •
.. _ -, • • • •-- •.
• .*.i:i:;:i:::::::: • • • .r .. .. . . _.
- • -. :. • • . - . - -• ' -•
. . .
ixr.txtir.2::: -. :\:-.;::....• •,;, ' '. ,..--,,:•::-..-;.::;••-:",•:::,1,....'...--..:..;•-:- :j..- - ••:.• '.‘ :•i•-•_",'- • : .-, . •—1—•-•- . . . 22 29 :-• :••••••.:-.;-.''', '.
• ,
. ditia..:..i..1:1:.;:. : •• , - .. _j_ _.• •
Mr:C:IX • --
. .
0•:•t-•;•:•;•:• •• -
. . - - - - - " - "- • ''- - ,
,.,.1 ::t:t::::: .. . . • • - - . .
• •. ..-• . -
'::::Aii:•:.::::::::• , . . ..--- • - •• I 39 , 22 ••. . :: -..---•••. .
' • . . - .
i
• .:......,....,.....,..
'' '14....0.1.
:•:.,-1.e.......:-.. .. •
' .,. .. . ......- •
• • ._
- . . .' •
—
.. .
•
• . _
. .. - ,.. .:. ....I!, .
---
- . • • •
. ..... .. . .
T . 11 24 •
. • ' ,
. ,
•
Boring terminated at 54 feet below existing grade. Groundwater • • • •.
encountered at 17.5 feet during drilling. Boring backfilled with
cuttings. .
• .
. ,
•. •
. •
•
• •. •
Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the lime and location of this exploratory hole.modified by engineering tests.analysis.and
•
judgement They are not necessarily representative Cl other tunes and locations We cannot accept responsibility for the use or imarpretstion by others ol
information presented on this tog
. .
,.
. _... . ..-.. • • -- BORING LOG
i'- i s .- :-•...,,._,:._. .
•
PROPOSED WAREHOUSE
•
Earth • . • ' . # (11,) • •• RENTON, WASHINGTON
• • .
Consultants Inc. „, - , •
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING &GEOLOGY Proj. No. 3453 I Date July'87 I Plate 6
•
•.
•
. . .
BORING NO. -
--- ,,L099ed By -STL - -
gm
Graph •
Soil Description • Depth (N)
e�►0 {ft.) Sample Blows
rill Brown gravelly SAND Ft.dense, with scatteredmCobb� medium
Gray fine to coarse SAND, led (fill
�:trdense,s wet (fill) medium SZ 20 21
5
Brown SILT with scattered organic 4 28
matter, wet, soft I 2
PUSH 29 PI- 4 - :;.
::;::J:•'t• • = �—. — PUSH 29
. 15 --
•
6 25
:+;:: Gray silty fine SAND, 20
• •
:: Medium densewet, loose
� •" With below 22.5' 10 33 •
':::�; �: brown silty pockets @ 22.5' • 25
ra:'f sm.
.
i S 11 22
i:ri'• faith slit pockets @ 32.5'' 30
•
11
35 • •
T 26 20
40
•
5 '-':.:' 26
Boring terminated at 44 feet below existin • •
encountered at 4.5 feet duringg�rgrade. Groundwater. . " "
to 42.5 feet. Lower 10 feet slotted. 1 PVC standpipe installed
-_ Boring backfilled with cuttings.
-
Water level on 7-9-87 was 5.5. •
r:=
•
•
•
.Subsurface conditions decoctedrepresent Din axerwtanc at the time and toceuon of this exploratory hole modified
engineering tests analysis.IncFdDement They are not necessarily�areeernad.e a other t and locations canna accept naponarbdny tor the erpmlatwn by others of
atbrmatron presented on this by
•
•
•
•
- - -• --- fit, A-
. _ •
~=- - =-�ti.• - BORING LOG
Earth • - 47 PROPOSED WAREHOUSE
Consultants Inc RENTON, WASHINGTON •
G�EOTECHNICAL ENGINEERINGr
B GEOLOGY .
•
Proj:No. 3453 Date July'87
f ,•
BORING NO. .
•
Logged By STL •
- - _ _ _ _
ELEV. �±
• Date 7-8-87 _ al 0 _ _
•
Graph CS • Soil Description Depth
ft lh Sample Blows
• Ft.
SW- Brown gravelly SAND with scattered
• sri
cobbles, moist, dense (fill) = 53 8
, . Gray @ 6.5' - 5 •
30 10
6
ml- Gray and brown SILT and silty = 1 35 '
.:•; :: SAND with - 10 = • 1 43 •
sm coarse sand and gravl._pckets and
i;j: scattered organic maf .e iaet --soft IC PUSH
- 20
' sm Black silty fine SAND, wet medium dense , - 13 32
: With silt pockets and scattered •
:�:i': 'c c organic matter at 22.5' . - i- 25 - '
.,.l'. ' :�:i: :.L 8 25
:e.,.;: •. 30
- .. . •" 1 22
:•;;:;::�.;. Gray silty clayey fine to coarse SAND ` f,— 35 _
'i� :-.N., sin with scattered gravel, wet, very loose
1 25 18
— 40
- : ::::d: Black fine .SAND with shell fragments, . •
-
..: :.: ::'i:: wet, -medium dense " . . . • . • `I 29. •.22
Boring terminated at -44 feet 'below existing grade. Groundwater •
encountered at 17.5 feet during drilling. Boring backfilled with ' • -
•
. cuttings.
•
Subsurface condrtrons depicted represent our observations h the time and location at this exploratory hole modified by engineering tests analysis.and
judgement They are not necessarily representatnre at other tones and locations We canna accept responsibility for the use or mbrpretatmon by others of
Information presented on thins lop
•
- _ BORING LOG - -
.. 11. -_ .;-:_.�3 _ --- -
1 - PROPOSED WAREHOUSE
Earth RENTON, WASHINGTON
Consultants Inc.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING &GEOLOGY Prof.No. 3453 I Date July'87 1ate 8
SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PERINCH. U.S.STANDARD ' GRAIN SIZE IN MM• M
0 N ;�CM a ^° m .f O O N O e} �If tb O O O t0 PI N O CO r d O O 0
III A 100^ N_ N (�� ~ O^ co N O O O O O O. O O CC O C
0 - I
® .N.
96
2 i - `� 10
5 r+DI ` —
m m go
80 20
i LA Cl 70 �_ 30 33
Z t. • c?I 60 - - J -�
O r Z + 40
m m __. \ 0
4 '�y' I
IW 50 i `- _� 5
oo
. c49r IN NIV-•,•••.• • *LM-)
401. , • , xo
� '1 ' . -(
I: •A. 130 -
•r� . m
It. 20 A so _
.4
V
Q l w
10 _ 4 �—90
w
ob r _
u,
1.1 M 14 0 0 - I I r ► I l I I I r_I I I 18 I I I► I I IT I I IT L► �p p ' 1O0
z itip 31 0 O O coO o v M N O CO 0 a I' N CO ID a M N r O g a O O O 8 O O O O 0
z to > " N — GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS o o O O O O
.N•► - Ch n z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE
CD Z
0 y COBBLES FINES
N -
O GRAVEL SAND
fn m
1.4 1-8 z 2 M KEY Boring or DEPTH Moisture
p USCS DESCRIPTION Content (961 LL PL
03 GIn Test Pit No. (ft.)
rn 0- B-A ' 2.5 SW-SM •Well grac 'SAND' with silt and gravel 7 •
E •
W Q--- B—E 2.5 SW-SM Well graded riAND'with silt and gravel 8
r • -r I • ,�i
t
3
f
•
•
•
C
41)
4
a.
to
• w
2 -
•
•
•
•
•
•
W .
>is
474\40A
PRESStsf -
Boring Depth - -- Liquid Plastic Plasticity Moisture Dry
Key No. (ft.) USCS Soil Description Limit Limit Index Content, W% Density
% % Before After (pcf)
• A 12 ,ML SILT 46 38 8 54 44 67.3
_ � CONSOLIDATION TEST DATA . - �.-
• • 1 - - PROPOSED WAREHOUSE . — — - z
Earth I,i •• RENTON, WASHINGTON
Consultants'Inc. 1`
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No.3453 I Date July'87 Iiate 10
\ \-.
•
,
4.
•
' . ....7.,.. . • ‘1.
••.-. — ..
. .
. •
. •
. .
*.. •
C
C'
E...) . . .
0
0.
•
. 6 4)............., _
. co
co
cu -
cc
•• ..
. . .
I . "••• .--:. • .. - , - - , . - ,
...
•
- .
. . ,
. ._ , I
: • k k I k 1 k .-.
'.c.,
• •
: • ..
•
- : • .
• - ' -- 7..-'7'
..::-.' - . • , - .
..'.:...,...
1 .
• - :. :: ,
_'.. .. .
• —.. .
'' • : = ... ..., . • . ,
':
• 0,..:*1 • - '
,.:
•
' ' •
, 7::•-:.- :.
:.• 4 -
••• .. .
'-- %
-2::, :: ,:. :.: • ,
:,••:::-:. .j ••-: ',`:: 1:;:'...:: :
k .
:.?••'.....1:.... : ----:'
• .- .
•
-.:';‘.. •.• ::•'-' • •
,.. ..- .
- .., PRESSURE, tsf .
- .. Boring Depth -._,-- . .,.
Etquid Plastic Plasticity Moisture Dry
Key No. (fi) USCS Soil Description Limit Limit Index Content, W% Density
% % % Before After (POI
-
0 D 10 ML SILT 34 30 4 47 37 71.9
•
• .
•
•
" ,. R. CONSOLIDATION TEST DATA
• :i. ;) , , ‘ , .. .-',.
- PROPOSED WAREHOUSE A
Earth :,
, i RENTON, WASHINGTON •
...
Consultants Inc. .
.GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY , Proj. No. 3453 I Date July'87 I Plate 11
wim.....
+ •
_ _ SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE -
M -• - NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING •
•
•
•
•
•
1
•
_
-
•
t4 OT - _ -,'-•' -- _-_ _ y.
•
Base Consists of arn-Inch thick, 2 foot by 2 fool plywood with __
• center drilled sie-inch diameter hole. •,'
-' '
- ,• : :Bedding material, if required,should consist of Traction Sand. -
- '__
• Marker rod is siz-inch diameter steel rod threaded at both ands.
t°L
_ ' ! .•parker rod is attached to base bynut and washer on each side .an.
. of base.
• Protective sleeve surrounding marker rod should consist of 2-inch - -
. diameter plastic tubing. Sleeve Is not attached to rod or base.
• Additional sections 01 steel rod can be connected with threaded
couplings. ` . .
• Additional sections of plastic sleeve can be connected with press-tit
plastic couplings. •
.
• Steel marker rod should extend ■t least S-Inches above top of
plastic sleeve. .
•
• Marker should extend at least two feet above top of fill surface.
•
•,l•. Typical Detail of Settlement Marker
Earth + proposed Warehouse Addition
Consultants Inc.\ , Ti Renton, • woshington
-;•. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING I GEOLOGY Proj.No. "3453 Date Aug. 687 .1 Plate 12
f
4.
,(. •
s
•
IMPERVIOUS SOIL -
•
•0..•4.�� i:L•:%:,r.••�•�+�.�,f• •r rW '••I.Zi��I_!•t.ti ..4'~:' I I� L
• 3.: •.`:i i':.i. • - stir--e,..i•.:-•:.
.**1'.. EXCAVATED SLOPE
18" MINIMUM FREE .••
DRAINING GRAVEL • MAXIMUM SLOPE
o���1E.ti •d :� y: • : '` fr . DEPENDS ON SOIL
• • Q.•®.: V CONDITIONS. IN NO
• • - =+' CASE SHOULD IT BE
STEEPER THAN 0.5:1(H toV)
. •.•••, - ii - 7 '
'?'• -UNCLASSIFIED BACKFILL
-ter :_
......6. •90% RELATIVE COMPACTION -
III •:fit ,
1 ft.MIN. • J_ .'••_' • ;-:• . � :`• PERFORATED PIPE
='r• ": /
L.' -• —' 1'°MINUS ROCK OR PEA ° ' .
1ft. MIN. ; COMPACTED SUBGRADE GRAVEL. WRAP
+ • ,MOCK WITH FILTER-FABRIC
- _ - • _ • _
Retaininglall Draa
a an: , ..,.:a, .. ..„.. ...: ._:.._ , : ..i.:„ :.'•;,.-',' ::'•
. , . ..
Backfill•
NOT-TO-SCALE ;
•
-•.NOTES-... . a
_...Classified backfill should consist of granular soil having no more than 5 percent passing
the 200 sieve and no particles ,greater than 4" in diameter. The percentage of particles
passing the 4 sieve should be between 25 and 75 percent.
....Unclassified backfill should be free of organics, clayey soils,debris, and other delete-
rious materials. It should be placed at or below the optimum moisture content.
....For free-standing walls, weep holes may be used. Surround weep holes with 18" of
1"minus rock. .
RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE AND BACKFILL
PROPOSED WAREHOUSE
Earth - iii)i -RENTON, WASHINGTON
Consultants Inc. • '
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Prof. No. 3453 'Date July'87 'Plate 13 -
% ' '4,41:-.'' -...;'°."." -:.*'•• - . t6101e!,-. ' '°•,,::.,.---••‘....••:7---:-.T.- 1.) _:.: ::4:..- '; l'...-•:‘• •) .0.- W:":... - - .r-.'-...'„,lr-1 I1 ..'. \ (....„\.._,1 •,% • il:; "•Liu'&111.4,_„.--.••••V-. '. i 7 1 1 .'. ' --- _ •
..- 2!!_,,-. - : 11„..,.--.:., '.',:'`c . -•;;. .•. 5. .:_Ck, 6..,.--C ). :7111 ' .... 41111o' 4-j'' --.-''-''''." ---.:511 r(i 1 ''.
111%
11'"$1"_.1-W_-,,,..-1:-r-..,--.:..-..,..,...•...-. -,,--;_.-__-_--„--.--„
• �y:. -,;._iAdio:I?VNW_.,-.....•....,o„,en,nrW_.'1:
ZO 0 -1 ca TT_ i
' ,_,.t,,,.....;-1- 1.........:t.......•• -.'. C3-/..„. .‘:: y _
__-..-.,_
,. if 4<.• .' •••.- -- __-- •,, _ - .----...-#,..• '-••"•4
•
- .:•:•---- - "--,40 'AN . . -0 •----- ---.---7.7-: •••• — ....
•
; -• - (--- ••-. ...j 1.---„_ I rilt --- ,
NM
F.
1 v ).,~ - re rya 7�/ J ? _ !�1' 4 +� • _ �k` ' i -44. ` i,•'
�.�,a� c ��. 'tea` I a'^` t ' ' C ^it%/ -! + 4 � •
1
C. i -NJ
/ ? ,. _
- q.„, 1. . `� [:
,. .. ..,.., ,
, ,., ,,:,., . . .,),..,_,,...
\,, ajo ,,:,.. . ,.,,,c,. % - 1..., •••.__- 11/4:_t_i.,), •,,,•:-/-777 , k
,. ____...,
_, • i ._
, ,- , ,..,..: , .., - , .,_.: \, \\ -, , _
, ,• ,
..„, ,
, , ,...,. ,
\ l , . _ . ._
1, . - p d,`. !.�- - a� ^ �' �- 's a i ii ,1 •G a -...-....-/ram 't\ 1',' ° r \*. •�
_____ _ .....:.„:„ ,:7;
„f _, , in. ..
, kk, :1-4,, , _ -. _-., -, 1 1
'... ' ' 1. 0 . I I r , k,./! , IN:
, 4.', Lrc...> 4...) 1 "'" .1 . " \)
4. I, (,, . I! , . - L.,. ."-1 .4'
•- •• ... , ,. , --' c----f'---„-(,-- - 7.:., ik
i.r.'"----.-. . , _
•
•
rj f ; • �J� � \ IvI� If • .a
/ 7. •
I
i ?t I :.
.\' ,\ I_I
- ç
d Ill
1 •,,....." 4.../-, N4k•*', :, ••: i ; e.,.. f.. :- I u I
,41,„
. __ .
• ,, ,,,,______„,. _, ___.„. - ,
. ..._
_____.
,.... ___ . * rt '1B7
..., ...:. , _ \ '' _--J */- :---:• tIvEt %ma
C/ !./. ..,..-- ---"4-,:-----,-----,---__.7 _ .. „N.:: .____ ___,, ,,-- --1.),_. t,, . \ ,,,
rCiir
I !-, - ' ,•-J. ,�,`-'1 �r���. -•— ' - WORK MAP FOR SHEET 21 of Q
I a a -� No. 33
I i •.r i — W
• =, • _ _ ,,^ _ FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP & o
K� `—`` CONTRACT NO.
.' ��s- `�-`,,'' -', �__ . FLOOD
4 _ _ , BOUNDARY AND FLOODWAY MAP EMw_$s-C-iss3 f(��
11 `r
ti ! ' i ,�z' _ " . _ _ COMMUNITY:
%� SOURCE OF FLOODING: W
�' �� "` '� :-�_' - � -- KING COUNTY, WA GREEN RIV
EE SHEET 1 F o , BLACK RIVER, SPRINGBROOK CREEK
- ' .. 1.-*'''''':-'-•-
.- .;..--.- ' ' zoA7e. Agt--'' '•''' _, _
• , -.....-- ---4._.......,_,
;
• 4 -• Q, ._
'''' ' -
• •• / .r,,,,,,,F.1 ..
....., J\ •._.----/- ' '.,. :-.... a----
., gii. ., ,..-., ,, ). . ., •• il 0 (., ' .'. ,, ' __ , . . • _ .. .
•,,•.. %.,.
i 2oisi xr,l'
-,,
k-- -'1.,i ,:, ,, i,,,, )
, t:. 4„, • . __________..../.. p. ,. [
oivE ••••, ';• - , -, i''.‘ ; k ,..„ -,
"Y.'1! ' ., * •
. . . Clip,:' ds„ i";1;' ' •.,-., 1.,,..-;',-. --,...., \ ".1f I/-\et.---./,‘ ...7..
-, *r• 1%. I.4, °•:!•V,10 ''.-' . . ) '... J471,4%.'i••• .. e.4.1:- ...;
:, 7 ''4,
i\
•
..'..- -.-• 0 •ge A \ . •
,-, , , .: %
,--_
• -
° it z 0,, -.-. . ' ..,..-,f:
. ." 1 :: 'I .,
... n 0 o`sr , :.•• \ .S, ,,‘r "'(' -4
0 C, - •'.. \ .--, ,. ..
1 \ ' .,.‘ -,.\ . v \ /40P 3; 3k ..,.% - ' (I: Zi .12C
4.a 1.... ''' ..--- \ .r_...?"—;,---4, - i '• : • r •• f ..\,•,.
. - ... „____/..„S •1
i
\:.\ ' • e.) ' k_ • '1 ' 1`• ..t'‘...,-----.-4' , . 41 -.1.,...,, ,
-4. 4.-• / . ' . ---••• .• 1
J 1 (0-Cll..,c••• • r. ,e'- ."' --& .. -.'-'--7:-..1=-1.-- ---'*-----' - - _-_-_:i.-1..- -% ., .-- --.:7.E
.' - ------ :' -•
i . : ''• i•
1 ,-• •-•.. . • t: /-,/',,1,/ i4 - ------z.-
,-- 1 ZaVetEL ' '''-,-;"f ._ • 414 -' '11 ''' -
• . , 1 ." •• ;..1, , ..,
•- 11 2
-•
. 4. ..i .
' , •.., . El . - _
.
.
• .zan/ff AE. Vi' -..... •
, -
k II
,
. .., .,.. ) lc;,..... -
„Qt.) ce,-,.;:._ ,
I
. _ • - - ' , .\. ..... Alik 11 . •
)1 V..),./-
\) t.:, ).
(.‘ ;,.. . ...7 -,_..,.. ........ .. ......"-- •••.-- ,-.............,,....... ,... ..,4,..II ilip : . 100 .., • ' k __.%), ...... • ...,,,,, ,,.... . zoN, x
,...,..,. .-...„...------- -----___,, N..„----,„,„,,,,, ....‘ •. , ,,‘ .,,t, .
..........„..... ';#$# .....:
41. . ..
lir
. \ e
_ _N 4P4lit• AA r‘'.. . . 0 --- ........ ...
.„
:4.,.-- -) •-.,.. .,. .,
, \,. .• .
.
.. ..„..1
..
r
1 , -...
,
'\•-•It) \" s s \ - A).1' 1
, , -- •>,..' \\‘ , '( ,-, ''' ;„,..., V(' _ .,1 1
\. ; .,-,... ..-L--4---.:11 - -- ••111f ''• •
)'. :. ••• 4 I.;. '‘.''s\ ''\I\ , \ ''.7\ ' Il
N CI ';.• \‘ - It \ \ 4- • 0
"A) ':.-. .•,..
- --..• I ki
r -...
.
111,
I •., -,,
-..... 4... .„,,
•,
, ', • '''*, ,
. ..
• ,-..•1, ( 4
-,..3' -) •-••
\t. ,...
\' .. \\7-... q •-.,. ',/.. si ) ;- . -
\\?
' cA I
''' 1 4
\ '''` '".. .• ' /
-4 t '.i, '; J",.,
. v.
ZOWE A - , -
i -,- .
-,
.. --,,
. r 1 ...., . . .
......
j ,
., ::•• ,.. , , ) ., .... ,. ,. ,
,. ..• ,...,..,,,.... _.,_. . ,.. ..,..... ,,, ,
, ..... ., . _ ,, f_,• ,, ....... ....
. , \. ,,, ,,, i. :•, ... ,,,, 1-• \ - , ...,
✓ .. l:•!, ...--- .. r? ', \ \ % ; __,,'7,...> II , I"'.
:10 r•Vii......,„-- - .'•P /
•. 'rt. -II . -------:'
<-- I •'s l" I 1 -. __ • -•-
.
s'
' ., • .,, . .... .„
-..; , .
i .•• . , .e •0\• t-x•k I ' e n .
..• .S." \ ' .•-• ' 1'I '''. s'r4 ' "Ili 41
•
. .•
-'
▪ ( 2
'--- ,•,, . .
. .
•4,••
•• 111, , .. /^ • .- s.-
\ , • I." -
. 4 4•• \• --4. "P \ (e,;., '
V% c• ,
1:- ..f . .., . ,\:' 0 , 1;,‘,. I l = -. -
•
. .1,
• ' II •, i N. .i ..---- -- ------ ------
• , \ . I''''.' ' ...4: \ .c, (44`‘ .4..., ,:'' ,.,-...e. 1‘..,._% 2,- , :„. ., ,. .... -------•'• ,_--7:_--- , ....
. f• al. • ;
,. i•-:` ...": ...,,1!..1.) , :-*.• ._.„„4., t r‘ ' ---- ‘ .- ,•., .-=---"'"---r- ? s.i. r_:..:,_.--'-% _ . ( ___- .! t\ \.'• ...
`"'N e \' ""-'s ' . . -- -• 11111/4
\ ,,_.t•- 4 .-„, * , - • ' . *: . .1 . :I.
' 4.--'''.. 'V 4 i - . . - •,. 1._____I+ .... -,,,. . .
,----- ..-- . —
• . 4 - 4,-. 4 - ..41 --‘1,12 0 At..,,_};_:.„,_... yb•••.• , ,
IN \ , • :::'"-..--'-------T-•••••.... ..
, k -•• , "7 •'*:--i-An, ". ., _ : ' 4. . 1 t•
) ..•••\ ' I: a• ' - 'Li"-- :. ri..ct
...•
,- N. ---:-:-•- ---_. - ..... . ' ,.-',.,--•*Ilki'e I , .,,,,.,•ow— -11401V-41:-__:, ----%- ' , 1 l''' [_)• t 1 d• ‘'n i,t.
•I
-1‘',-t--e•:\N. ->- -----.-___ , . --.4-77_,_-- .,..:- 4//,,amor--,..- ,„;„, ,„.. di ,,,a 1 ..... ........- '''' ZO X
- . ,...., s,...0 ••••• ,„ ••• •„,,me- „..--...- .., ,-,, C.3 •
.;:. \N'l \ \ • - ---- 4 ..:
• ., \, -J.-, ., , -A f ci V c? , . :
,,‘, • .... • • . .
.) •-,. .;\ ,' \„‘ .', , ,.. . • ....,- -. - . 1, ; — ,:: - -0 4,,,, ‘,. ,
• ) . _ ..„_. ._ . • .. • . •_.,--..-..
, / • , -s-.-, ,--- 0 44111,1
„ ,, .1 i., -, . ./,‘„, :_/-- i c„. ...,„ ,, ......• _ 4 _ ,,, .
a- - • '• __=_ - -
N , S I • . t ,,., ' ------
. .....,
v..%),.. I it,..,*. ,.!:, , • i . 4• 4"..'T
144.4.444444'44.44"4"-'''"""'".""'""•111.1111.11.11111.11121"
..• , -L.'... . -
'IIII --•;?'- ''.'%M. - 11111414.
'A ) ‘., • _ -," ....- •4'' ' 43.0-6.1.2°‘ - ' R -• -' "'"UiF---. • -'7-77------__---•'-':''--
'A / , r• . V:
' - N\J'. 6 .., -7)---.4)_\_.,......e.010" ... •-__1_.----.------ . ,_ co 1 ... .,,.. !
'
/ . .'''f, 4",, 2. I ' ..N, \.--.--..---4-?,.,___ '1. .• -. ' •__ _ ______ _!1‘..ji ,".'„_-..2„,, --TO tr-,9 rni".7fi.:A/- -,..' •._ .r_----,, .,..L:.•- _ . r Fij -
.,, , ,,; _. , ,,,10:1F4616... ,e-iii.
„..... . , ,--.- - , ....
. ,
,, „ • •
-111 /-.-' , ,„, •,
----- ,..--- -01 ... • 11.
V ' . Z' rAtj
E .1 • ' 1 if' - 1,5„.„./ -- .40, . e''' f , ., •. • Aft
',
.--...., ej ,. . i , , •,..dh ,. l '- ,
. '-'4.4 --I VA/ • ...
..- •:..\ • i'....T-
/
' 4 ... .
.1 . .. .... ,t1 4 . 4.4yk .......14.......-
•...•.
Aw 211i ei------...( jig.. -.;- -------‘ •) ---",\I-j 1- 7.-- "
P.\''\\;*•\'\\‘:k. ,.. litifl\A" , -3 i• 0.0„.....-__,4491, e.,..••,:::, le, - '-.\•:•Risl'g.. tilt - Irri, - _ •_ •:.
1.g$V -- . ----- -z-- — 1- 2-. MI • -7-1 - .t ,•17 - .
..../ .......__/ - . c, •
,'\\C ''.' ''' /- •'. 4._- - -0 ,..- " 1. •f-- )„ - ---. ...1-- -1,f '."--- ...3
'e:11Prinp.
6 1 . .-, •-•"' 0,- •
*‘% . ' • '.., • t (::=1 tc • '‘all‘(1 41." \, .1:0 .4A.:' ':41: " , 2 . •1 ''
`7.--' Awl, el:- '''s.-- 2, \ 'i ‘s
/ .-tt,\ ‘',,
,,...„ .,
1„ ,
r1 ., . ..---- --...i...- tt-i. , 0,...._ ,4, , • ,...
(......---
)ir
i
'‘‘,, 4 0 ' s.. s , ,, ,--,.."7-:';-------"---"'"".---'- •Nis:4\i\.. r1;11Z irl'"`'"'''.) - IP I.\. \\ o°c ,. 'r—,'1.._I :i; —, --...." 4:::____, -,.. _1 ;,.4 t
•,:
'' -\ A ':' •0 ' 1
1 A
%' )
),,..-_---,--- ' \\\ 9,p 0 0 •I q ‘ \v. ...cS
/ ...•-•44 .-____ 17-,-. ..,..„,_,-,.. ..••••.•4......._
I -..••••••-•-•- ..4.
.. .
•• ti s, /
;C // ') 11 1 . f• ,, I •1 ''t
1
,j l'• -, fho 1 0, 0 1 01
'''. '‘ 16 ' .14. 0 % • , ,:: t\ ,.., -- . . il ,...
.;
,• ...., ,:c•-
'1 . , '\\ \ 0 IC—-1,1't::Q*11 jou,' 4 . -7.---;-- .•'t\S. (
• •
I
(--- •
4 4
1 1.• \-
4:.
1,. ;111I '''''.••
Illel, 1 /......./•-•sr'., t4/I,..• 4I 1 ..
' '•,..:.'.., ..,./..;. Ie. -,:...:i; ...
't-Nt. • 1 i Ss 1, .. --
\G-- . ‘ 1 •••• I
)
I I • :
It. i I 7 1 it• i 1, 0 ‘ . i '
•
e,r,fr: r• 1 .0...... ,, , . , . t.., • I I, UM-
1 411 )
•ti / 1,.. '•
1 I
i 1. — .
.4. •'''.•4 Ali Ir
' 11 1111(.47-1-ii.'Ili nia. 11
I ....t . • • r
r.- -. \ '"-,.• '
••-. 1.. • 'a. '
e•-.
4. 101 /eQ4Z21. 1,-4 6 0 4 *-, r•-•.:- 14 I.,\-.i ' ''Ir -', g••-r ..,
• -,a,
/ ...-/
• V IT i 40:i--i- • i - 1
• I a I -...
/ ---.----- 4' --
/...
.., , i...I>, a ,II ..
--,.. •
f. k}11 4 ( .1'4
111 t Il raT-- k - ..--•••
: I ,
' • •••%. i \ 1 ".,• , I
if; 1 . • ' x -1' ..42 i Imp ,11 1 1 ;.-: • . i•
. 1 ••• - . ....f..• :7'1 i abI,1 _. •_____ ,. 4 \_, _ z) , 04•161P . •., 1)\"
,
/ am= 1. • ..„
'-"--- '
e - \) .1 • C111(1 . •
-,..4 • .•
" ' , ,••
r,1 \i..e.,4,--. 0.....4;::.._ . ,
4 I r. : t 1%.* II' '1. - -' I --19' • ? °'44- •14 a I,
__11 1 • /, . .„..;,___,.._.....:. 1 ' ‘44 's• 'I I \'• -• •-•.1
' • .4" '-----s /-• • I / '' 4 'qi 1 a • P:,I Pl‘f•/:_)
isi 4 ' I I 4 4, ,.., . : _ _ ,i. ,, •,1:0 1.\
/ / 14 I . I 1 I l' at•'. A ‘r /
rr%4".jP;IF:j‘' '. I
. it ''.•/, ,i. 1
, I
Ili / I f• 1... ... . 2. \----:s•J ,.....- ris,
.. , , . , , ,i,, — .... ___ , ,, :—..,, , ..
,.. ........ ,.
I 1 \ '1 •„ 4 1.1 / -4(' -1 i /..)
• X 1 1 i 11 tf i. ti, ' A I 1
D ' 1 c...1.4 ...
;.•• A ..-- , r ,- 4 )
...4.1 6. r ( , p )0.. . rz... ,/.' ..„.
. , ,s‘ ,
4 ., 1 .77.,,.S,,.. 4,- 1. • '., '
•I ' ; ii 1. o',' , • .-.. I I 1
. .
1 ,•-, . ' 1
, ,
„:.)
ligil..y) , ,..
._ ..,... ; .4 .". ., i . ....
s -(t4..f ....--, •. . , .
1 .
$ 1 i) r\ . ii 11 N„ . 2.„.„,, .
,, —1 d \N..,„ \.. I • '' ,.....
u 4.,).‘ g"k i, . 4.1..........,-,
-. .,
•
• .1 '----
If' ' 4h ,I'
, 1: • , •ifili I • i ( ):••
ll ) .11 ,• .
11 1 I
I'1 M • o es 0, .7511 \ ...i. ,,, , , 1
i ... All.. el...i.
I I I
l 1 :
* i I it.,
' . Ina - V
ii01 4L,\.. :,... - ',\....,;,c.,,,--j,' . , ,i'•t
. i •%. • .. ts- 1 . {„
,..• • '. %. '
li. L \ ., \-- .1
• • L----•••• ' t....•!..)•• ,
.. • •‘`' ^ ' I ' ••••......,
, , ...` ' I • . '"- N \ :• .'-.. .. i
. ,1 1 \il ' -.... ..,j ,7- H: iiv., Li ,1\ 1, _./. .„ p ".....,. 1,
I
I '.. \ •! \ &t. /
till , •_..",\ '' - *. ' '-----
. ..... ,,, .,
= I elp , I. ' • • ?%
.1, . ,..5 ....• evl i I•_•=7,E7.- 2v
i r '' \,, ... •• ...,.„„ ei, 1 N
iri:‘ -„s .*_____---"",, • 7 ' '
...) ...... :, __ ,
3. _, •
c,°'
. _
--_-_•__-____:".
•,'il, ' ' li lit ' / bil 1. .
• „_ t- / • , 1 !1,..,.. ---- i---- i ti• . ,..„... ,$1,i 4:t ----c. •
, 1 1 Tr , . : J- P. \ •‘1.• N.,. ------
/ I I • '''",..79e) 1 p---,,e,---,-..„___..„..,1, -- .,..„.Th4:\
.„,... ... t t
I, f".II . y 1 - 1 ____,...-- ____,__, • . _.
-:. ,N.
, :. E) .. I l'/ 1 V2 \' • -
• '
, • C-I 1-1 i e l _ 1 ' , .
,. EE SHEET 1 P ,
,.,
I .ill plannncltlr, rearures oursruc spcu. . .,.....,
w It I or adjoining Wrap panels, see separately printed Index to Map
— i Panels. i
0-
F
---r INITIAL II)I N I II ICA I ION: 4•
JUNE 7,1974
I LOOT)IIA/ART) BOUNDARY MAP RI VISIONS: v
NOVEMBER 7, 1975
i~Q
if;
d.
II.00D INSU RANCI. RAIL MAP III l r I I\ I ,
MAY 5, 1981
11.00L) INS(IRANCL RAIL MAP RI.VIStONS:
A
r ...
to determine it flood insurance is available in this community.
contact your insurance agent,or call the National flood Insuranu
Program,at (800) 638-6620.
1
APPROXIMATE SCALE
500 0 500 FEET
I--) f-1 1=1 __ I O
J
0
tl.
I
CATION 1101
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
of power telephone pole
hwest 16th Street bridge
side of road. Established ,
ent. j
power pole on north side FIRM
'vole east of Springbrook
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP uhlic Works Department.
_on east side.of driveway
ird Street, 51.5 heel south 1
eel south 01 south lace of 1
I:•ublic Works Department. ><. ;as+r-� :.,., •a 'leira: ,r,.w...
11 y4 � **1; •45 '•'._ CITY OF '
;
tt ' . RENTON,
1 98a
isio it. .
WASHINGTON M it
KING COUNTY
PANEL 4 *OF 5
1 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED)
r
Rent*
cagy
r-
1,
COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER
530088 0004 B
MAP REVISED:
•
rF 5173,
1.
• �,y .ph� F�'
1 '
Federal Emergency Management Agency
1.�
1 REV.PRELIMINARY I I 90 DAY STARTS I I PRELIMINARY I 2
\ g II-
j \ 'R9.
ZONE AHr y �z :
_y
''" LONGACRES :
RACE TRACK _ __
ZONE Cu) w ,, J z�. �.'
ZONE N E C SOUTHWEST 19TIi STREET
,s .
ni
J t• 3'k, M
QI s FM.: ,, lij
f
C t -ZONE AHf-1 _
O 0i I �dra ' .. .s (EL 151
+ I I ZONE AHo
D !, j o
14.. .
(EL 15) 5.ZONE C i
ZONE C �� I
( �+e. e ZONE.. C ' i
wi
ZONE C ZONE C t , ii
" q i
AH o- �� _i ,r , Aei
r z
" 4 ZONE JA4 ;\\
-i ZONE AH II
) ----
1 IEL151 _
/ ----SOUTHWEST
'
P
Z 5 .1 l
1 Bridge Under
p, ,`` . ZONE c I1�(-Construcrivn
cc
a �� 1!f ZONE
�, I
a 1
y ° I g ~ ZONE AH -
z Ii 151 , _
cii ZONE C S001WEsT Zrty ST ET . I RM 10 p1
____________}:
_. -'�- —�. -,_cn
~�� ?_-+*'R+.+!"+wia�w .'Aiih ... � '�4 ' �
__.___. _ • ZIP
If-
t '
¢� sl 1
' ,�' a " I ,4 s; S W _.2 l 111 S 1 R� I
j
ii.
f
[01—zors1
(EL
L —ZONE C'' ''
. . .,ZONE C __ { =�_._..___i.,-,._..•
SDUTtgME$L
— ! ITH STREET Ili. ZONE B 1,
SOUTHWEST 31ST STREET
• f,. ZONE A4�
tip
i - f t 1.
ZONE B
/�r� PZ �OJtG �r5 16 ZONE AH f
''✓.rc" 3 ( G4d,N' . !aa e«. J (EL 161
41�c91 Z. 4�/4`C T�fUJ`�lr.1 i[G�v.SI!►
lS j�r, f � ) i , .
ZONE C
_ 1
LI :
:11
jOP0
�- P�
°
Zes-
$QUTHWE$T ..--_3SSH SII EE-I__
ZONE C —
✓� ZONE AH I
ZONE B (EL 16) r- '-- HAYMOW)
m}
i
I ! -_—' _{__ Abandoned Railroad 1 —+--- _, 1 , __
5 --OZONE C
>> OUTHWEST 41SL_ STREET-- --- -- -----
�- —
ZONE A4
ZONE B
+ M
�r all planimetric features outside special flood hazard areas.
For adjoining map panels, see separately printed Index To Map
Panels.
r _ i
INITIAL IDENTIFICATION:
JUNE 7,1974
FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP REVISIONS:
NOVEMBER 7, 1975
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP EFFECTIVE:
MAY 5, 1981
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP REVISIONS:
•
Refer to the FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP EFFECTIVE date
shown on this map to determine when actuarial rates apply to
structures in the zones where elevations or depths have been estab-
lished.
To determine if flood insurance is available in this community,
contact your insurance agent,or call the National Flood Insurance
Program,at(800)638-6620,or(800)424-8872.
APPROXIMATE SCALE
500 0 600 FEET
1—I I
/1111
limummemanollo
rloN NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
power telephone pole II
:st 16th Street bridge
le of road. Established
✓er pole on north side FIRM
east of Springbrook
c Works Department.
east side of driveway FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
street, 51.5 feet south
south of south face of
c Works Department.
CITY OF
RENTON, WASHINGTON
KING COUNTY Fil
04:04A--
PANEL 4 OF 5 111 IP I
(SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PF tP4t D)
Tom—.
COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER
530088 0004 B
EFFECTIVE DATE:
MAY 5, 1981
federal emergency management agency
federal insurance administration
'
ZONE A4
�,
y ` g
TN N
1 ZONE C 3 � �,/' E R
ZONE �4 a� N cs, �'` f / BURUNGT O-1
�' pY F-
10 W ,n
\\\\
S,• T W
ZONE C �. /so���� _
�x / i 2 ~
F v)
3 D o
co
W w
)pors
' 6*. .1 Tr.,, ,‘ S
•
W W > /
f- > Q 4
—OAKSDALE AVENUE p Q _-
SOUTHWEST N - - - --- --- - -
•_--- --=-- - _
O W
W Z U O J
'_ __ _ Z Z z Q
0 y Q �
—_ —'-- .'`aOUTHWEST 16TH STREET
W
t Z to16 \ 16 0 O , ,_
}
I ( Ai } F /
ZONE C tu
i b
`F++ ! /( ^'\� � i s r .vo,......
rr
/
I�' , ' ��.......,ti�\ •� ZC
_ONE AH r
(EL 16) I 1
ZONE A4 `
J .' - ZONE C ��---,__ ZONE C lri
H #�� :;LONGAARES �'C)P�E
cc RAC& WRACKOO
C) 4 )/; '
1 191.::1,nti,.. ,f?h.�55d+i,,k e - /. il 9:i ( / Jii?0,40,1.,:.
. $
v \ r e t s d t
_ TUNE C " " r' i
/
ou.
r Y+ , Fw i. J _I
,I
ZONE AH
(EL 16) i
I
2 et Ar,,i •
, 4E,Ldif U,7WN
k.
Q. a° ZONE C ,, •'* ZONI
O
z
ci 2
J
CC
CO SOUTHWEST 27TH STREE _
t
— ZONE Apt , t
. 0 W W 29TH STREET
1 715I.' 4i
i -1/1! {
I ..\...tuetaem... .... ,,,
, ,, . .„.**Ititii
I SW .t„NI
STREET }
S_W to —SSTREET f
f
} }
, { i
1 1
- f f
OUTHWEST 34TH [ STRE
._� I I I
•
I I
q 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 11 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
I1 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I
-....i,:1),Hil '1 i
I I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I'�:1;;.'7"»a
.... -_ .. ram.s.:,
.,t` `�tom.. .�a ,a > o o IL Ed oi.i do'.> .o�..tom.- • 10.1 E I . .ono. ..N.! ii=.o do'..�f ooa. .m.o.. o a t�_>T �.. rtN ...s 2
1 .° u.in..,r(mr) ...a t'a•.idIV.) • t,.r;:`.u:�n i7-d.+mr...er+) 7 ; °d.°�
-{ E' L E V A T I 06 N °1 r9
Q 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 t 1 4 4 4 4 4 Q ® I
I
•I . IIII o
0 Z
a 3
W E S T ELE V A T I 0 N
I)mtlir-
a - •
rnn • 4 4 4 Q OO o
,_�— ..... .. 0 ix
II 11 1 I aw.... ..r....
N 0 R T N E L E V A T I 0 N 1'
w
w
p o cr
co
I
I
1 I I I I I I I I i I I I I 1 I -P- ale)wr .--•µ
N
.. Tr_E
d 3
S 0 U - T H E L E V A T I 0 N
to O
co 1
°
°
O
41 id
0
4 °
.421, i
2BY m
?-�LLL m
0 E o
~ mN
U� m
J m0
W
ehaa
In
I
I 1
I
I \\ A`i I i l I -l I
I`• P
"
/ 7 I i' lil l''
m
�I A
__,,_(_,
IIe FFee
R e F I 0
x
V INDUSTRIAL PAR ( Fp
—
ENTON II �I
., .�. \ \ \\\. R w A
2
L I ;N G T OU N ; N mO R T H E R N m ii
--- --
II :-
' m.te . = J3! NWt ' «. -- -- a ,.? . o
RI AL PARK RENTON 2E i c I OO BI! RI
lit El,
r r. LINO AVE v ,. 3I{ltl`
,•y .�,� m - •Ru E P�_L_-A„T ;. a R i
lji!
I
I 11
11111
O N s N 0 R T H E R N. 0 RI L L ( A s
p 6!�I
11111
1 P A'R K 0"F R E'IN T O"N D 'I,V. I A i'pl
li
: m Ike w .... PII ,m M1_ I'I1!111
s 11 ill,i III II
' �I - - Ih m ;Ill
Y—...-=ND -.-._...._..........r._ ..—.�req, —..____ ., - --�.�_._.EAST.-•. MALLEY. _"._AD._ Y�w`,--
1 Y Ili
1
./I -IHIr7- n.-r �
r.b ..
—lance mueller �a���a3ma ou��co���oa� —
A , & associate >wa a..w.
1 2 architects aia S W 27th STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON ,,,ee,,.,
„ 130 Ieke.m.•...tn.wee.90103•3021323 2883- --1.31
.vommommgAr
GENERAL NOTES to' rcrrX2:".I-Z,IZ:=III:=1/.ItrITtr:.trodrnnIVIII,;un,,,,,./......tu.. 1 i LI 1 r-
..,
11
....'..nr..."..."....... I?
U.
r-1
• e. S
C.
Mne...Zeiitgr=r=.r217111..t:rj...:T.t:t:::
....re.. (All current editions a.moo.e,Neel nutnorityl.
""""""'"."d""tru*""lenrtemperature will be beim
I= ,
17.'reent=ron731'1:-T.drintt:74":%'.:f":frtneles't'o avoid 1 %
_ Interference between divisions of Ne wort.
..— =I
_
...°Z.nsbn.c.r.b.”sZP..nd........z.z.N.Nr•........r.z•
— -.
Ar.
_
21.Concrete walks to Net Zne follow.criteria:, uL
_ .,
e
— e ei , ZNN Nr'en..-.mln••3,Ns• I OZ_
2.2
_
. A 23.1:7titivLfrtures NI be drawn on.once.but snail be provided es
-4 MN 'a 0 E
— :=Itterte'd:rgerre'd for seismic Zone IN.submit
(,)
_
-:-
2M1.gel=t7e=a:ItrTel'renrst.cturel onsIneer for nom
3 <
_
-._
_
. .4 =in IiiL 1:
3..Zli roar toovnted equipment N N: Z
w 1..
IN z
11177111 _
L
IM
li
11
VICINITY M A P
-
N — . ,D
i II
g
1 —.—
—4—
— III ,.
1 z
r ,
, 4 „.,...4, :41. -,1 ,If" I-
....--,L 4'
ow*.1 il
N.---,CFF,e.",-.719mc „' ,r.-,. WA-•
c.0
ac
re
I--
1
Mr'
I, .Z.C.L.E.., 1 .14zeOlailkliii'*'". fill, 'ISR 4
F.r.a.18, N
,51-ra 4 61-D& •STAT.,., I -—.. ED -4-
ITS.:'',!,',,".- 1 -,": KV FEMIIPIN :•' ' ' a CV
I . icL . -..--:4-4-M Al " ' ' • 1-- 4
In
wnlIti:u:s VW.;0'1. W
1
_
— • 0 :41 I ANL i kw I -
— ,
_ Ap.. I . ..,
-,,_ - . . 1.--,r,.fflo "%1 i
_
‘
i-,
— -:-
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
i
•
• 7,.: — :7E2,17i.=:,i1.7,E.:F.12-7;i71-1:7;`-°::1-=4!.- . t g
CO O.,
'
4a.e r.e e Fr.e,s
———•. z..tn.'r. .•‘ Comon....eto north..corm.of.1.1 Soctio.
0 .
• '-'d.i '' ' .r.i. A _ n-..-Z.1:172,tr:nt-,...14'..V4===.1r•"""` :2 I
. ., .
••••\ _
- ' ,..111111,111Villiilli-I'll ';:'.: 'i' bItItItb 4 RIFFEll.it7:11::1:1.11..:Fat!!!."1!::::,F,E.::.;11.°E.:P 1-jcaj 2 1
11 tIN lee ,: .: -4::'-'' k ''" ...,""•P'' Sp al 1
• •• ' .,.qi• -,ii :=.;-_:=2T;I:414f,:-.1L'=m.:',;;..17.'11'0:7` u °a „;,,,:.1-',.? • ,...'
- L ' ,. .' i LI MOIL LiThil ! ! IMIIM
lrealTornIr=o:Ziot...TatgoltdanattetZ41•114P5Mon .‹ n'"an 2
-J a
.,.• .. T:7=4.no:tottot ottt„ot nom,ttoo ot toto toom.to tto toto
a- MO V
.:i.., ,,,ZerS,12.Z:e.an,rn,-sem.. • f===.=1"..e.:r4:1117f m f°'.*"'''''''."'a w Cheat
t
.....
—.
•
4 4,1.".^ .a..,o a....mot.,
•
•
•
.
2 . /)
•
I!" I,'
I.
1 I III , ;a , . I 9 " _ _ -- "
rr
I N 11' ' (- //
II-1 I s! I '_ _ \ r I
1\
�� ' D ( \ T11 n f 11 -00 zo �i
� 01�u 1—_ 4
60
,---
0. Pxm \\�� aMi n° D 2,0
/ I 1 1 ,
/1 N. / IIm 2 k 7
rr- _
05
T1pse I �
I � 1,
� �
I
. -B W. - e o \___ "' j
,
1 o--1., — _,,_—I. — Q
"
1u 11l • t pw
... (.1
Id
a'''' ____) 1)
I 11_ 1 1.---00—./.=-1,..----,6----.y..-----A6---y-7,7,-is.7—r—r---/ -6.-- -Y 7-
•
•
-
�
SrKI NGSz = oK
1
•
Lrrcw:I� ' ./ '
T- II 48
4III � "s a=
ys
s A
, _< Nik . .. . (.4. ',rev \ ti. I.2.1 ,i..
1 IT1 Ii- .�
-\— '; m, 6 —r t;.4�11. Oef:,
'‘, kt,..
3,-.7,1.''''"-I 414% a.
v,..min%�".� „1 �i�i
I II'I LI SCHEMATIC GKADIU6 4 1.,I L11, 1,60
W' nA- E 6 6 s e a o 1 s T tz 1 our=z s /�^_ BUSH,ROED&HITCHINGS,INC. l9;"4.`�4
c rn J I CIVIE ENGINEERS&LAND SURVEYORS SEAL n
zT4 ST KG BT' viv au • I q.9 p u
- E FEMTe.J,,uASHI HGTGH BRH Iu... w�� „H6
— — T
-
i
S -
C.
di r — L I J —� PLANT SCHEDULE n F
9 ' —., . .I f�-rr. I I�'p-N IUL/Cq.{I.101)I-1M{P. �JL•5 K(:t+N4-
{i I ,- ED D6 pUlaHus fcsnlPoua/IallooN rtAgt e c-L, ;D c m'I-
V _.• ;{: eo PSeuentsuEl^kr-AzE 51/IzuyL 6 plrc c'-e' o:o o si.
( - • k .� —\ .•:: 6, feat,.NE7cpal'NY /NEVI!EIP-4 ax C-s' _ v 5`ti
1C, ¢ =• w
0
3a p,Pus rral r'Nlyu/ oH9azcrpo�.x a-I,'
Icl ''----. :?:•:•4 I \ O 61 AGE12 cozGl.1.4ilb-1/'Ns I-I�LE 6'-6' 9 7(PJ-1 HIH.
1i1 WO —�\' •••• ya 5,4oNYHous A..q./l 4'l W5N 15'•1e"
�% Um GI hNo4Nla_rp.3 il/pNaT1NW, 3-'
111.k
�� «sa 'w Ae.Lu,cinwnlrloaA/AL L.Ia 3 a.Future ulng Wans:ion,.; Q —
Iq
\ cofalPasTER'Lawr,r" 4 cars 50'o.c.
I.,,; �+ IS`:a: FIE)x.W.HEux'ram srFL1;'I/gmEN -"Ill, ,-.1"o.a.
410 1
Wpple I,-,r
2
I^' Q —
k \ NOTES
Id' I h —' - e.m ee .��..., .ieurt em orb- ...rr,ixe
rL
4 _ - 1-10nv l-nronun vC rnucewne wroo).ma,
0.. -t..s ,1,1 MAT.*lam:,ArTuc mr aa.o-,y+...-
� •!! C.017" (. � nx1rC-eerrwr n+w..imrwrin' W: �- - - ytaliH sCokrlauos Niirat TvrssIN
\\ (lom.
ss olue rrnw) arssurr 1-1 ,&
.uHf+cees .s s.a.w(YC veTaL)
." - c acr a+o zw mcr c,eco .au..me
CPc•rsrrs ..151,..E.s.
11I asx.,uu A.M. LuENua a
'y V rw.�Innev s ..r.com�rurtyz`ne�rs`pu,
a, Y - ALL_LFNo1'al'K.AzenA T APGe.-v AUA 4a.TI laA 11'oI. in
IN
8 0
I41
to _ H
ri a
to, �,,e' FI'vt wHLA.rproaJ- Q
0 y 1.eu...bap-wm ttielFY4 41
to
N, \, uItOr �,Pyua `v�+IzPc yrera-,Jve H E r��r
zzz uzb•Arm INI.b 11•PP N 1"Z-
jo .I AR'R1 At MJp yLh�aQ rn QIlII f£W,rETu".u7.pup511 )_ Pwl.4�lYs o=9uPMyw+7 rPaNI q1 6!LL`'' to g
A 1-e'w, m
i',�,. a= ----..,t„„.,,..,...Pzm,ular<,FwTP arx+bt•
tfli.
pc _�,,,,,....f1NeFw. m
• a �'�' N �I``r (YsN4h k'hu•IFP0-1,-t Y .
cu
/� U
iar,
II �� 3_ TREE STA1CNG 8 PLANTING DETAIL. v j� ! 11 m U
le t
moot,
--.I',di- \ — 1.- TREE IN PLANTER BED ..i:�'xmo, Wq 3!�
6 S
yp
'� barb _ up OD AIDI I I I 1 1 9 — . AQ scale:1'—40r .s y In v
SW 27th S I K I L1FAow.4. z'alelkj 9(s-1 0Wm
EARTH ENTERPRISES
nit rea.%"r11 L-1
BEGINNING
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
8A -' 27 - 01• /
* ttpiatiod
SA.b/1 -S ?
RECEIVED
of RA, AUG 21 1981
Jane Mueller & Assoc.
4$ © °z SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971
s
o — CITY 0 F RENT 0_�N Coil Ot i�i om
9�9r ���Q� PLANN I NG D P )- ''
g
F E d1,
I 6110
LE LD:NG/ZONHNG DEPT.
APPLICATION FOR: OFFICE USE ONLY:
�7 "p7 Application No. : Si� --�(' - ..� _
ECF No: Cry
SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT Sec-Twnp-R `"
• PERMIT Date Received 'lf
Date Accepted
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Date Approved
Date Denied
I 1 VARIANCE
Publication Date AFF
Comprehensive P1anlrnJA)OcACTt3i?u\' L,, p K.
I 1 EXEMPTION Zoning \fP, YfA,i D C-ro('�1 1 PA 1
Water Body -pR,1(3 �,'(( -).Roc.
In addition to the information below, the applicant should include a site
map and any other pertinent information which will assist in the review of
this application. The Planning Department reserves the right to require
additional information needed to evaluate the application (note permit
procedure on the last page) .
APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1 THROUGH 14 BELOW:
1. Name of Applicant ,44g5kA D/67'R/rn'r4 -$ MG
2. Mailing Address (00/ Sixr, a' .5'6w-rale
SE4rrG�' / �F}. Polo$ /Telephone: � G - 3ao0
3. Applicant is:
N, Owner
❑ Lessee
❑ Contract Purchaser
❑ Other (Specify)
4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant:
/Telephone
5. General location of proposed project (give street address if any or nearest street and
intersection) ow S. jitJ: .9941 st GUesr er= L/N° ,due,
•
6. Legal Description ( if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) :
7. Name of adjacent water area or wetlands: .SPR/AEG t3e6o, . G et-7ER Ciec Gocil- h.)
•
8. Intended use of property: ®F /c /, / rt /,6O1?'Oiv ,r¢G/'/i7/
•
9. Generally describe the property and existing improvements: crop /5 €45/44
(a-t —' /45 .PPizoe aN 5/
10. A. Total construction cost and fal.r market, value of proposed project include
additional developments contemplated but .not included in this application:
B. Construction dates (month and year) for which permit is requested:
Begin 07-/. /917 End 'e '7 / 9cS'a
11. Does this project require a shoreline location?-Explain.
1
•
12. List any other permits for this project from state, federal , local governmental
agencies or the City of Renton for which you have applied or will apply, including
the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for, and if so,
the date of the application, whether the application was approved or denied and
the date of same, and number of the application or permit:
04/044
Amy l;A -ce
13. Site and vicinity maps (refer to application instructions) :
14. Additional information:
15. VARIANCE CRITERIA
If the applicant is seeking a variance, the applicant must include a written
(justification) narrative addressing the following criteria as 'ispecified in
Section 173-14-150 of the Washington Administrative Code:
A. Development On Land.
1. That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance
standards set forth in the applicable City of Renton Shoreline. Master
Program precludes or significantly interferes with a reasonable
b__ permitted use of the property.
it
•
•
•
•
[ •__ LEGAL • DESCRIPTION
•
That portion of the northeast quarter of. the northeast quarter of
•
Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. in Ring County, State
of Washington, described as follows:
Commencing atlthe northeast corner of said Section;
- Thence south along the east line of said Section a distance of 180.01 feet
to an intersection with, a line parallel to and 180 feet southerly, measured
•
at right angles to the north line of said Section;
•
Thence westerly, parallel with the north line of said Section 20 feet to an
intersection with a line parallel to and 20 feet westerly, measured at right angles, to the east line of said Section, and the true point of beginning;
Thence southerly 1074.37 feet along said line parallel to and 20 feet
• ? westerly measured at right angles to the east line of said Section;
Thence north 88°24'48" west 560 feet;
•
Thence northerly, parallel to the east line of said Section, 1095.48 feet
more or less to the intersection with a line which runs north 87°12'59" west
from the true point of beginning;
Thence easterll
�, parallel with the north line of said Section, to the true
j point of beginning.
EXCEPT that
portion conveyed to the City of Renton for road purposes by deed
recorded under 4ecording Number 8401240272.
•
11", .4 VI
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
OUTLINE OF PERMIT PROCEDURE
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
I
1. The applicant obtains the permit forms , completes and returns
them to the 'Planning Department.
2 . Applicant puts public notice in newspaper of general circulation
in Renton once a week for two weeks .
3. Interested parties may submit comments to Renton Planning Depart-
ment for 30 days following last public notice .
4 . After at least 30 days from last public notice , Renton Planning
Department grants or denies permit.
5 . Within eight , ( 8) days from the Renton Planning Department action,
copies of the action taken and the application form shall be sub-
mitted to the Washington Department of Ecology , and the office of
the State Attorney General .
6 . If permit is : granted, permittee cannot begin construction until
30 days after date permit is granted. If permittee is informed
that a review of the permit is to be held by the Hearings Board
then he must further delay construction until the review is com-
pleted.
7 . The minimum time required to process a permit is 68 days .
8. If permit isidenied, applicant may appeal to Shoreline Hearings
Board, as outlined below.
APPEAL PROCEDURE
1
Appeal initiatedlby Department of Appeal initiated by the applicant
Ecology or Attorney General or by a private party
1 . Either the Department of 1 . Any person , including the
Ecology or Attorney General applicant, aggrieved by
may request review of the the granting or denying of
granting or denying of a a permit may request an
permit within 30 days of appeal . The request is sent
the action of the Renton to the Department of Ecology,
Planning Department. Notice the Attorney General , and the
is sent to the Planning De- Hearings Board.
partment and ', the Hearings
Board. 2 . Either the Department or the
Attorney General must certify
2 . The Hearings Board conducts a the request as valid for the
review as requested and accepts review to continue . Certi-
or overturns the decision of fication must be given within
the City of Renton . 30 days .
3 . Any part to the review may 3 . If the. request is certified,
appeal the Hearings Board the Hearings Board conducts
decision to Superior Court. a review and sustains or
overturns the decision of
the City of Renton .
4 . Any party who fails to obtain
certification or any party to
a review before the Hearings
Board may appeal to Superior
Court.
City of Renton Planning Dept.
February 9, 1973
REV. : September 12, 1980
2. That the hardship is specifically related to the property, and is the
result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural
features and the application of the master program, and not, for example,
from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions.
3. That the design of the project will be compatible with other permitted
activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent
properties or the shoreline environment designation.
4. That the variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special
privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area, and will
be the minimum necessary to afford relief.
5. That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental
effect.
B. Development either waterward of the ordinary high water mark or within
marshes, bogs, or swamps:
1. That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional nor performance
standards set forth in the applicable City of Renton Shoreline Master
Program precludes or significantly interferes with a reasonable permitted
use of the property.
2. That the hardship•is specifically related to the property, and is the
result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or
natural features and the application of the master program, and not,
for example from deed restrictions or the applicant's{ own actions.
i I
3. That the design of the project will be compatible with other permitted
activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent
properties or the shoreline environment designation.
4. That the variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special
privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the !area, and will
be the minimum necessary to afford relief.
5. That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect.
6. That the public rights of navigation and use of the shorelines will not
be adversely affected by the granting of the variance.
STATE OF LUASHINGTON )
CITY OF RENTON ) ss
I, - �— (cd, .. tere_ _ , being dully sworn, certify
that I am the above-named applicant for; a permit to construct a substantial
developmen :. an to e eline Management Act of 1971, and that the
foreg. • g statements, answers, an. ' .formation are in all respects true and correct
to th? best of my knowledge and belief.
Si gnaturi 45 --ie404- frt
owl
Subscribed and sworn to me this day of /
'
• Notary Public in and for - State of
Washington, residing at
171pj ,s
Pt II o100-r
13U1LDiiN!G/ZDNING DEPT.
d i
4EMORANDUM
To Marillynn' Peterson, City Clerk Date 2/18/91
From S7 ?eeger •
Subject Alaska ;Distributors SA-071-87, SP-095-87
This project has been withdrawn by the applicant and .is ready to be filed with
the City Clerk.
I
k
CITY ENT �
�i 4
® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director
i
March 9, :1988
Alaska Distributors
4601 Sixth Avenue South
Seattle, 1WA 98108
i
i
RE: Environmental Detelinination for Fill and Grade Project
File SP-095-87, Property located North side of S.W. 27th
Street.
1
Dear Sirs:
This letter is to inform you of the Environmental Review
Committee' s revised decision on their review of your project.
As you are aware, the Committee had issued a Determination of
Non-Significance - Mitigated on January 18, 1988 . There was a
fifteen day comment period which ended February 2 , 1988 .
During this period the Committee was made aware of new
information from the Department of Ecology with respect to the
City° s flood control project in the Valley (P-i and P-9
Channels) . As a result of the information provided, the
Committee at its regular meeting on February 23 , 1988 , revised
its earlier decision on the Determination.
The Committee is now prepared to issue a Determination of
Significance due to the fact that mitigation measures for
flood storage capacity loss cannot be met at this time without
further istudy. Previously, the City Policy has been to
require applicants to compensate for filling by digging out an
equal portion of material below the 100 year flood plain
elevation for these portions of the site below this level
which are filled. This digging in the past has been done in
the P-i Channel alignment. However, at this time there are
questions, being raised regarding the flond control program in
the valley that must be answered before we can proceed.
.
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540
I
Alaska Distributors
March 9, 1988
Page 4
Rather than prepare an environmental impact statement the
Committee would recommend that you withdraw your application
and work with us and the other Valley property owners on
resolving the issue of how and where compensating flood
storage should be provided and what configuration any system
of channels and wetland for retaining storm drainage in the
Valley should take. A meeting with Valley property owners is
proposed to be set up within the next 2 to 3 week.
The City is required by the State Environmental Protection Act
to issue threshold decisions within (20) days when there is
new information provided. In this case, we would like to know
your Company's decision as to whether it wishes to withdraw
the application, or not, by 5: 00 p.m. on March 14, 1988.
Should a decision be made not to withdraw the application at
this time, the Committee believes it will have no other choice
than to issue a Determination of Significance. If you have
any questions please call J9anette Samek-McKague or myself at
235-2550.
(72)
e Envi . men -al Review Committee,
/ f el
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
DKE/sgr
c:alaska
CITY OF IINNTON
kw,
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director
March 9, 1988
Pat Kerr
130 Lakeside #250
Seattle, WA 98122
RE: Environmental Determination for Fill and Grade Project
File SP-095-87, Property located on the North side of
S.W. 27th Street.
Dear Ms. Kerr:
This letter is to inform you of the Environmental Review
Committee's revised decision on their review of your project.
As you are aware, the Committee had issued a Determination of
Non-Significance - Mitigated on January 18, 1988. There was a
fifteen day comment period which ended February 2, 1988.
During this period the Committee was made aware of new
information from the Department of Ecology with respect to the
City' s flood control project in the Valley (P-1 and P-9
Channels) . As a result of the information provided, the
Committee at its regular meeting on February 23 , 1988 , revised
its earlier decision on the Determination.
The Committee is now prepared to issue a Determination of
Significance due to the fact that mitigation measures for
flood storage capacity loss cannot be met at this time without
further study. Previously, the City Policy has been to
require applicants to compensate for filling by digging out an
equal portion of material below the 100 year flood plain
elevation for these portions of the site below this level
which are filled. This digging in the past has been done in
the P-1 Channel alignment. However, at this time there are
questions being raised regarding the flood control program in
the valley that must be answered before we can proceed.
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540
Pat Kerr
March 9, 1988
Page 2
Rather than prepare an environmental impact statement the
Committee would recommend that you withdraw your application
and work with us and the other Valley property owners on
resolving the issue of how and where compensating flood
storage should be provided and what configuration any system
of channels and wetland for retaining storm drainage in the
Valley should take. A meeting with Valley property owners is
proposed to be set up within the next 2 to 3 week.
The City is required by the State Environmental Protection Act
to issue threshold decisions within (20) days when there is
new information provided. In this case, we would like to know
your Company' s decision as to whether it wishes to withdraw
the application, or not, by 5: 00 p.m. on March 14 , 1988 .
Should a decision be made not to withdraw the application at
this time, the Committee believes it will have no other choice
than to issue a Determination of Significance. If you have
any questions please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or myself at
235-2550.
F the Envirom ent 1 iew Committee,
V
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
DKE/sgr
c:alaska
�� - CITY OF RENTON
4.. N.? BUILDING & 2;ONING DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director
March 9, 1988
Lance Mueller & Associates
130 Lakeside #250
Seattle, WA 98122
RE: Environmental Determination for Fill and Grade Project
File SP-095-87, Property located on the North side of
S.W. 27th Street.
Dear Mr. Mueller:
This letter is to inform you of the Environmental Review
Committee's revised decision on their review of your
project. As you are aware, the Committee had issued a
Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated on January 18 ,
1988 . There was a fifteen day comment period which ended
February 2 , 1988. During this period the Committee was made
aware of new information from the Department of Ecology with
respect to the City's flood control project in the Valley
(P-1 and P-9 Channels) . As a result of the information
provided, the Committee at its regular meeting on February
23 , 1988, revised its earlier decision on the Determination.
The Committee is now prepared to issue a Determination of
Significance due to the fact that mitigation measures for
flood storage capacity loss cannot be met at this time
without further study. Previously, the City Policy has been
to require applicants to compensate for filling by digging
out an equal portion of material below the 100 year flood
plain elevation for these portions of the site below this
level which are filled. This digging in the past has been
done in the P-i Channel alignment. However, at this time
there are questions being raised regarding the flood control
program in the valley that must be answered before we can
proceed.
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540
Lance Mueller & Associates
March 9, 1988
Page 6
Rather than prepare an environmental impact statement the
Committee would recommend that you withdraw your application
and work with us and the other Valley property owners on
resolving the issue of how and where compensating flood
storage should be provided and what configuration any system
of channels and wetland for retaining storm drainage in the
Valley should take. A meeting with Valley property owners
is proposed to be set up within the next 2 to 3 week.
The City is required by the State Environmental Protection
Act to issue threshold decisions within (20) days when there
is new information provided. In this case, we would like to
know your Company's decision as to whether it wishes to
withdraw the application, or not, by 5: 00 p.m. on March 14,
1988 . Should a decision be made not to withdraw the
application at this time, the Committee believes it will
have no other choice than to issue a Determination of
Significance. If you have any questions please call
Jeanette Samek-McKague or myself at 235-2550.
Envir ent Review Committee,
aafil
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
DKE/sgr
c:alaska
lance mueller
associates r- ° �`
LI isr�.
architects JAN 2 O1Q88
January 19, 1988
Mr. Don Erickson
CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPT.
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Mr. Jim Hanson
CITY OF RENTON BUILDING DEPT.
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
RE: ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS
Dear Sirs:
Please hold in abeyance the permit applications for Alaska
Distributors until the council appeal #CU-064-87 by Mike
Mastro and Benton Smith is decided.
Sincerely,
LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS
Bob Fadden
Associate
BF:ks
cc: G & M Investments
Alaska Distributors
130 lakeside • suite 250 • seattle,washington 98122[208]325-2553
lance mueller ale,cal•senior aseocietee:robert olscheweky,eileen furney
associates:robert fadden,michael gelbraith,richard harnieh,robert wells
a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by end under the supervision of registered architects
Public Notice
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION • RENTON,WA
The •
Environmental Review committee
(ERC)has issued a Determination of Signif-
• icance for the following projects:
Audrey Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath states (ALAS LANCE
A D UE LUR A D SCIATE
that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the BUTION WAREHOUSE.
Applications for approval of 1)a site plan
for Phase I of a complex to allow the con-
VALLEY DAILY NEWS struction of a 148,000sq. ft. warehouse
with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2)a
• Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition pealaita% and grade
adetollowsPPciimtelYaoo cubic yards of al
e-
Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers rial on the site; and 3) shorelines substan-
tial development permit. Property located
are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six on the north side of S.W.27th Street at the
months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published 800 block and directly west of Springbrook
Cr
in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King 87eek. File Nos. ECF-060-87 and SA-071-
County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Further information regarding this action
newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington fori rtm ble in ent, Munithecipal Building, Renton,
King County. Washington, 235-2550. Agencies, affected
tribes and members of the public are invit-
ed to comment on the scope of the EIS.
The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Comments must be submitted to the City of
Renton Edition Auburn Edition (and not in Renton by 5:00 p.m.on February 22, 1988.
' X Any appeal of the ERC action must be
supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by
during the below stated period.The annexed notice a 5:00 p.m.,February 9, 1988.
Public Notice Published in the Valley Daily News,Jan-
uary 25, 1988. R2771
was published on January 25, 1988 R2771 •
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the
sum of $ 2 5 .6 0 .
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 9 t h day of Ja n»ar y 19
NTniN
Notary Public for the State of Washington,
residing at Federal Way, `I
King County, Washington. / "LINING DFPT.
VDN#87 Revised 11/86
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WA
The Environmental Review committee (ERC) has issued a Determination
of Significance for the following projects:
LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATES (ALASKA DISTRIBUTOR
OFFICE/DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE
Applications for approval of 1) a site plan for Phase I of a
complex to allow the construction of a 148, 000 sq. ft.
warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2) a special
permit for fill and grade to allow approximately 47,400 cubic
yards of material on the site; and 3) shorelines substantial
development permit. Property located on the north side of
S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly west of
Springbrook Creek. File Nos. ECF-060-87 and SA-071-87.
Further information regarding this action is available in the
Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton,
Washington, 235-2550. Agencies, affected tribes and members of the
public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. Comments
must be submitted to the City of Renton by 5:00 p.m. on February
22 , 1988.
Any appeal of the ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing
Examiner by 5: 00 p.m. , February 9, 1988.
Published: January 25, 1988
11,
ed61 4 CITY OF F'=° ENT. N
rap 'a BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director
January 18, 1988
Alaska Distributor
4601 Sixth Ave. S.
Seattle, WA 98108
RE: Environmental Review Determination, File SA-071-87, SP-095-87
Dear Sirs:
This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee
completed their review of the environmental impacts of your Site
Approval request for property located on the north side of S.W. 27th
Street at the 800 block and directly west of Springbrook Creek. The
Committee on January 13 , 1988 decided that your project may be issued
a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following
conditions:
1. That the fill application be limited only to the Phase I fill
until such time that the City, in conjunction with various State
and Federal agencies, completes an evaluation of the Wetlands in
the Valley including those currently on the site.
2 . That the applicant contract with a licensed professional
geotechnical engineer, approved by the City, to monitor the types
of fill material being deposited on the site and to certify the
level of cleanliness of the fill material being placed on the
subject site.
3 . That the applicant work with the Public Works Department and the
Police Department on acceptable haul routes and hours of
operation.
4 . That the applicant provide a wheel washing facility on-site with
a sedimentation pond.
5 . That the applicant design construction entrances with a rock
covering or other material acceptable to the Public Works
Department. This entrance should be approximately 20 ' wide x 50 '
deep or of a size acceptable to the Public Works Department.
6. That the applicant provide a $5000. 00 bond to the City to cover
street cleaning and potential City liability.
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540
Alaska Distributor
Environmental Review Determination
January 18, 1988
Page 2
7 . That the applicant provide acceptable compensating flood storage
capacity for that portion of the site which is below the 100 year
flood plain level bringing that portion up to an elevation of 16
1/2 feet. The applicant shall work with the City's Department of
Public Works staff with respect to the amount of compensating
flood storage and the location of said compensating storage.
8 . That the applicant provide both on-site active and passive
recreational space. At a minimum this shall include outdoor
seating and two picnic tables and a workout room or a half court
basketball area for employees. ,
9. That the applicant contribute to the City a traffic mitigation
assessment fee in the amount of $231, 870 based on $197. 00 per
ADVT since the applicant's project is located in the Valley
Transportation Benefit District.
NOTE: The applicant may be eligible for a $9. 00 per trip refund
if they have an approved TSM program.
10. That the applicant provide a traffic signal warrant analysis and
traffic signal design at the intersection of Lind Avenue A.W. and
S.W. 27th St. The applicant shall install the traffic signal if
warranted. The installation cost for the signal is not included
in the Benefit district assessment fee.
11. That the applicant redesign the parking area, placing
approximately 116 spaces into a landscaped reserve area as
allowed under Section 4-2208 (12) .
12 . That the applicant provide the City with the necessary easements
along the Springbrook Creek frontage for flood control and
maintenance.
OTHER:
In addition to the above mitigating measures, the Environmental Review
Committee identified that the project's employees will use the nearby
trail system once it is constructed along the east bank of Springbrook
Creek and therefore the applicant should consider making a voluntary
contribution to the City to mitigate the off-site recreational
impacts.
. f
Alaska Distributor
Environmental Review Determination
January 18, 1988
Page 3
Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation
measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a
required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are
solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may
have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will
end February 2, 1988. Following the end of the comment period, the
City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require
a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination,
there is a required 14 day appeal period. Appeals are made to the
City's Hearing Examiner. In addition, by the end of the comment
period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date
before the Hearing Examiner for your application.
If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please
call our office at 235--2550 and ask for myself or Jeanette Samek-
HcKague.
For the Environmental Review Committee.
�; . .I _mot_
ff /
Donald K. Erickson, AICP /L-6>
Zoning Administrator
DKE:cs
CITY F RENTON
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director
January 18, 1988
Mr. Bob Fadden
Lance Mueller & Associates
130 Lakeside
Seattle, WA 98122
RE: Environmental Review Determination, File SA-071-87, SP-095-87
Dear Mr. Fadden:
This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee
completed their review of the environmental impacts of your Site
Approval request for property located on the north side of S.W. 27th
Street at the 800 block and directly west of Springbrook Creek. The
Committee on January 13, 1988 decided that your project may be issued
a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following
conditions:
1. That the fill application be limited only to the Phase I fill
until such time that the City, in conjunction with various State
and Federal agencies, completes an evaluation of the Wetlands in
the Valley including those currently on the site.
2 . That the applicant contract with a licensed professional
geotechnical engineer, approved by the City, to monitor the types
of fill material being deposited on the site and to certify the
level of cleanliness of the fill material being placed on the
subject site.
3 . That the applicant work with the Public Works Department and the
Police Department on acceptable haul routes and hours of
operation.
4 . That the applicant provide a wheel washing facility on-site with
a sedimentation pond.
5. That the applicant design construction entrances with a rock
covering or other material acceptable to the Public Works
Department. This entrance should be approximately 20 ' wide x 50 '
deep or of a size acceptable to the Public Works Department.
6. That the applicant provide a $5000. 00 bond to the City to cover
street cleaning and potential City liability.
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540
Mr. Bob Fadden
Environmental Review Determination
January 18, 1988
Page 2
7. That the applicant provide acceptable compensating flood storage
capacity for that portion of the site which is below the 100 year
flood plain level bringing that portion up to an elevation of 16
1/2 feet. The applicant shall work with the City's Department of
Public Works staff with respect to the amount of compensating
flood storage and the location of said compensating storage.
8. That the applicant provide both on-site active and passive
recreational space. At a minimum this shall include outdoor
seating and two picnic tables and a workout room or a half court
basketball area for employees.
9. That the applicant contribute to the City a traffic mitigation
assessment fee in the amount of $231, 870 based on $197. 00 per
ADVT since the applicant's project is located in the Valley
Transportation Benefit District.
NOTE: The applicant may be eligible for a $9. 00 per trip refund
if they have an approved TSM program.
10. That the applicant provide a traffic signal warrant analysis and
traffic signal design at the intersection of Lind Avenue A.W. and
S.W. 27th St. The applicant shall install the traffic signal if
warranted. The installation cost for the signal is not included
in the Benefit district assessment fee.
11. That the applicant redesign the parking area, placing
approximately 116 spaces into a landscaped reserve area as
allowed under Section 4-2208 (12) .
12 . That the applicant provide the City with the necessary easements
along the Springbrook Creek frontage for flood control and
maintenance.
OTHER:
In addition to the above mitigating measures, the Environmental Review
committee identified that the project' s employees will use the nearby
trail system once it is constructed along the east bank of Springbrook
Creek and therefore the applicant should consider making a voluntary
contribution to the City to mitigate the off-site recreational
impacts.
Mr. Bob Fadden
Environmental Review Determination
January 18, 1988
Page 3
Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation
measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a
required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are
solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may
have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will
end February 2, 1988. Following the end of the comment period, the
City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require
a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination,
there is a required 14 day appeal period. Appeals are made to the
City's Hearing Examiner. In addition, by the end of the comment
period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date
before the Hearing Examiner for your application.
If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please
call our office at 235-2550 and ask for myself or Jeanette Samek-
McKague.
For the Environmental Review Committee.
„(.7
Donald K. Erickson, AICP ,% G✓
Zoning Administrator
DKE:cs
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
(MITIGATED)
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-060-87
APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-071-87, SP-095-87
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applications for approval of 1) a. site
plan for Phase I of a complex to allow
the construction of a 148, 000 sq. ft.
warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft. office
mezzanine; 2) a special permit for
fill and grade to allow approximately
47,400 cubic yards of material, on the
site; and 3) shorelines substantial
development permit.
PROPONENT: Lance Mueller & Associates
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located on the north side of
S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and
directly west of Springbrook Creek.
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning
Department.
The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that
it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the
environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required
under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an
expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file
with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures
by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section
4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These
conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified
during the environmental review process.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act
on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from January 18, 1988. Any
interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted
by 5: 00 p.m. , February 2, 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen
(14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the
DNS.
Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055
Phone: 235-2500
DATE OF DECISION: January 13, 1988
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 18, 1988
•
Ronald G. Nelson Larry M. Springer
Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director
Richard C. Houghton
Public Works Director
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
MITIGATION MEASURES
PROJECT: Alaska Distributor Office/Distribution
Warehouse
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-060-87
APPLICATION NO. : SA-071-87, SP-095-87
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applications for approval of 1) a site plan
for Phase I of a complex to allow the
construction of a 148, 000 sq. ft. warehouse
with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2) a
special permit for fill and grade to allow
approximately 47,400 cubic yards of material
on the site; and 3) shorelines substantial
development permit.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located on the north side of S.W.
27th Street at the 800 block and directly
west of Springbrook Creek.
CONDITIONS:
1. That the fill application be limited only to the Phase I fill until
such time that the City, in conjunction with various State and
Federal agencies, completes an evaluation of the Wetlands in the
Valley including those currently on the site.
2 . That the applicant contract with a licensed professional
geotechnical engineer, approved by the City, to monitor the types
of fill material being deposited on the site and to certify the
level of cleanliness of the fill material being placed on the
subject site.
3 . That the applicant work with the Public Works Department and the
Police Department on acceptable haul routes and hours of operation.
4. That the applicant provide a wheel washing facility on-site with a
sedimentation pond.
5. That the applicant design construction entrances with a rock
covering or other material acceptable to the Public Works
Department. This entrance should be approximately 20 ' wide x 50 '
deep or of a size acceptable to the Public Works Department.
6. That the applicant provide a $5000. 00 bond to the City to cover
street cleaning and potential City liability.
7. That the applicant provide acceptable compensating flood storage
capacity for that portion of the site which is below the 100 year
flood plain level bringing that portion up to an elevation of 16
1/2 feet. The applicant shall work with the City's Department of
Public Works staff with respect to the amount of compensating flood
storage and the location of said compensating storage.
8. That the applicant provide both on-site active and passive
recreational space. At a minimum this shall include outdoor
seating and two picnic tables and a workout room or a half court
basketball area for employees.
9 . That the applicant contribute to the City a traffic mitigation
assessment fee in the amount of $231,870 based on $197. 00 per ADVT
since the applicant's project is located in the Valley
Transportation Benefit District.
NOTE: The applicant may be eligible for a $9. 00 per trip refund if
they have an approved TSM program.
10. That the applicant provide a traffic signal warrant analysis and
traffic signal design at the intersection of Lind Avenue A.W. and
S.W. 27th St. The applicant shall install the traffic signal if
warranted. The installation cost for the signal is not included in
the Benefit district assessment fee.
r//
11. That the applicant redesign the parking area, placing approximately
116 spaces into a landscaped reserve area as allowed under. Section
4-2208 (12) .
12 . That the applicant provide the City with the necessary easements
along the Springbrook Creek frontage for flood control and
maintenance.
OTHER:
In addition, the Environmental Review Committee identified that the
project' s employees will use the nearby trail system once it is
constructed along the east bank of Springbrook Creek and therefore the
applicant should consider making a voluntary contribution to the City
to mitigate off-site recreation impacts.
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE
AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON SCOPE OF EIS
FILE NUMBER(S) : ECF-060-87 and SA-071-87
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applications for approval of 1) a site plan
for Phase I of a complex to allow the
construction of a 148, 000 sq. ft. warehouse
with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2) a
special permit for fill and grade to allow
approximately 47, 400 cubic yards of material
on the site; and 3) shorelines substantial
development permit.
PROPONENT: Lance Mueller & Associates
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located on the north side of S.W.
27th Street at the 800 block and directly west
of Springbrook Creek.
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department
EIS REQUIRED. The lead agency has determined this proposal is likely to
have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental
impact statement (EIS) is required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) and will be
prepared. An environmental checklist or other materials indicating likely
environmental impacts can be reviewed at our offices.
The lead agency has identified the following areas for discussion in the
EIS: Earth, water, plants, animals and transportation.
l
SCOPING: Agencies, affected tribes, and members of the public are invited
to comment on the scope of the EIS. You may comment on alternatives,
mitigation measures, probable significant adverse impacts, and licenses or
other approvals that may be required. Your comments must be submitted in
writing and received before February 22, 1988.
Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee
City of Renton
200 Mill Ave. South
Renton, WA 98055
APPEAL: You may appeal this determination of significance in writing
pursuant to RMC 4-3016 accompanied by a $75. 00 appeal fee no later than
February 9, 1988, to
Land Use Hearing Examiner
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the
Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA
appeals.
PUBLICATION DATE: January 25, 1988
Ronald G. Nelson Larry M. Springer
Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director
Richard C. Houghton
Public Works Director
•
. .
N. OT I C E
ENVIRONMENTAL
•
DECLARATION
APPLICATION NO. ECF-060-87 AND SA-071-87
'APPLICANT LANCE. MUELLER AND Assoc. (ALASKA DISTRIBUTOR OFF I CE/
DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE)
PROPOSED T
Pur IONS FOR APPROVAL OF 1) SITE PLAN FOR PHASE I OF A
COMPLEX TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 148,000 SQ.FT. WAREHSE W/24, 500 SQ,
FT. OFFICE MEZZANINE; 2) A SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE APPROX.
47,`400 CU.YD MATERIAL ON SITE; AND 3) A SHORELINES SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOP ,
GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NOR"
" SIDE OF S.W. 27TH 'ST. AT THE 800 BLOCK AND DIRECTLY WEST OF SPRINGBROO1
.CREEK. .
•
POSTED, TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS
OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. •
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
(E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION
DOES IK1DOES NOT
•
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
WILL .WILL NOT
•• BE REQUIRED.
THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS
PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW.
COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY
5 P.M. FEBRUARY 2, 1988
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
' BE FILED WITH 'THE RENTON. HEARING EXAMINER
. BY 5:00 P.M., '
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
• BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550.
,• DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION.
•
• Public Notice
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE '
AudreyBenner RENTON,WASHINGTON
,being first duly sworn on oath states The Environmental Review Committee
that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON-
SIGNIFICANCE — MITIGATED for the
fol-
lowing project(s) under the authority of the
ReVALLEY DAILY NEWS have completed
al Code. The Applicant(s)s -
have completed a mitigation process pursu-
197-11-350.
ant Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition anLA CECMUELLER AND ASSOCIATES
(ALASKA DISTRIBUTOR OFFICE/DISTRI-
Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers BUTION WAREHOUSE)
are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Applications for approval of 1)a site plan
for Phase I of a complex to allow the con-
months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published struction of a 148,000 sq. ft. warehouse ;
in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2)a
Count Washington.The ValleyDailyNews has been approved as a legal special permit for fill and grade to allow
S'� g pp approximately 47,400 cubic yards of materi-
newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for al on the site; and 3)shorelines substantial
King County. development permit. Property located on
the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the ,
800 block and directly west of Springbrook
The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Creek. File Nos. ECF-060-87 and SA-071-
87.
, Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in This decision will be finalized in 15 days.
supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Written comments received after 5:00 Feb-1
ruary 2, 1988, will not be considered. A
during the below stated period.The annexed notice a fourteen (14) day appeal period will corn-
ivotice of Environmental Determination mence following the finalization of DNS.
The mitigation measures imposed by the
was published on January 18 , 1988 R2755 City of Renton's Environmental Review
Committee are available at the Building and
Zoning Department, Municipal Building, I
Renton,Washington.Phone 235-2540.
Published in the Valley Daily News Jan.
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the 18, 1988.R2755.
sumof $ ," ° U
Subscribed and sworn to before me 2 8 t h day ofJ an uary 19 88
Notary '`-(blic for the State of Washington, � �� ` ;..� 'i�
residing at Federal Way, L.J
King County, Washington. u.�'J ,a' / /;i �N G i ro �-T.
VDN#87 Revised 11/86
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination
of NON-SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED for the following project(s) under
the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have
completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350.
LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATES (ALASKA DISTRIBUTOR
OFFICE/DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE
Applications for approval of 1) a site plan for Phase I of a
complex to allow the construction of a 148, 000 sq. ft.
warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2) a special
permit for fill and grade to allow approximately 47,400 cubic
yards of material on the site; and 3) shorelines substantial
development permit. Property located on the north side of
S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly west of
Springbrook Creek. File Nos. ECF-060-87 and SA-071-87 .
This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments
received after 5: 00 February 2, 1988, will not be considered. A
fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the
finalization of DNS. The mitigation 'measures imposed by the City
of Renton° s Environmental Review Committee are available at the
Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton,
Washington. Phone 235-2540.
PUBLISHED: January 18, 1988
-
( (4) )
BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
STAFF REPORT
DECEMBER 9, 1987
A. BACKGROUND:
APPLICANT: Lance Mueller & Associates
PROJECT: Alaska Distributor Office/Distribution
Warehouse
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-060-87
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applications for approval of 1) a site
plan for Phase I of a complex to allow
the construction of a 148, 000 sq. ft.
warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft. office
mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill
and grade to allow approximately 47,400
cubic yards of material on the site; and
3) shorelines substantial development
permit. i
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located on the north side of
S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and
directly west of Springbrook Creek.
B. ISSUES: Whether sufficient information has been
provided on the source of fill for the
site.
The applicant has not disclosed the
source of fill materials. The applicant
proposes to place 47, 400 cu. yd. of
material on the site which is located
adjacent to the Springbrook, P-9
Channel, the P-1 Channel and the City
owned wetland;
Whether sufficient information has been
provided on any wet areas located on the
property; .
Whether sufficient information has been
provided on measures to keep pollutants
out of the Springbrook Creek drainage
ditch and other drainage ways and the
City owned wetland during construction
and during the life of the project;
Whether sufficient information has been
provided on haul routes for new fill
material;
Whether sufficient measures have been
provided on measures to keep streets
clean from debris;
Whether sufficient information has been
provided on compensating flood storage;
Building and Zoning De -rtment
Environmental Review _mittee
Staff Report
Lance Mueller & Associates
December 9, 1987
Page 2
Whether sufficient measures have been
provided to mitigate traffic impacts;
Whether sufficient information has been
provided on active and passive
recreational opportunities for
employees; and
Whether sufficient information has been
provided with respect to hours of
operation for the fill project.
•
C: RECOMMENDATIONS: . Recommend that the Environmental Review
Committee issue a Determination of Non-
Significance-Mitigated with the
following conditions:
1. That the fill application be limited
only to the Phase I fill until such time
that the City, in conjunction with
various State and Federal agencies,
completes an evaluation of the Wetlands
in the Valley including those currently
on the site.
2 . That the fill material be certified
as to its cleanliness by a licensed
geotechnical engineer.
3. That the applicant work with the
Public Works Department and the Police
Department on acceptable haul routes and
hours of operation.
4. That the applicant provide a wheel
washing facility on-site with a
sedimentation pond.
5. That the applicant design
construction entrances with, a rock
covering or other material acceptable to
the Public Works Department. This
entrance should be approximately 20'
wide x 50' deep or of a size acceptable
to the Public Works Department.
6. That the applicant provide a $5000. 00
bond to the City to cover street
cleaning and potential City liability.
7. That the applicant contract with a
licensed professional geotechnical
engineer, approved by the City, to
monitor the types of fill material being
deposited on the site.
8. That the applicant provide acceptable
compensating flood storage capacity for
approximately 17,400 cu.yds. of fill for
Phase I at a location or locations
determined appropriate by the City.
Building and Zoning D trtment
Environmental Review ... mittee
Staff Report
Lance Mueller & Associates
December 9,. 1987
Page 3
9. That the applicant provide both on-
site active and passive recreational
space. At a minimum this shall include
outdoor seating and two picnic tables
•
and a workout room or a half court
basketball area for employees.
10. That the applicant contribute to
the City a traffic mitigation assessment
fee in the amount of $231,870 based on
$197.00 per AWVT since the applicant's
project is located in the Valley
Transportation Benefit District.
11. That the applicant provide a traffic
signal warrant analysis and traffic
signal design at the intersection of
Lind Avenue A.W. and S.W. 27th St. The
applicant shall install the traffic
signal if warranted. The installation
cost for the signal is not included in
the Benefit district assessment fee.
11. That the applicant redesign the
parking area, placing approximately 116
spaces into a landscaped reserve area as
allowed under Section 4-2208 (12) .
D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS:
Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the
project. These comments are as follows:
Police Department: The reviewer made the following comments:
1. Wash down for the lugs to avoid tracking
debris on roadway.
2. Fill haul route approval.
Fire Prevention
Bureau: No comments. 1
Design Engineering: No comments.
Traffic Engineering: The reviewer made the following comments:
1. Assessment for Transportation Benefit
District:
Office 26, 305 sq ft X 17o70X$197=$91,723
1000
Warehouse 145,780 sct ft X 4.88X$197=$140, 147
1000
Total Amount $231,870
(To be paid when permit is issued)
2 . Provide for traffic signal warrant
analysis and traffic signal design at
Lind Ave. S.W. and S.W. 27th Street. If
traffic signal is warranted, the
installation shall be provided and the
cost shall be in addition to the
Transportation Benefit District
assessment.
/ • , •
Building and Zoning D Lrtment
Environmental Review imittee
Staff Report
Lance Mueller & Associates
December 9, 1987 ;
Page 4 /
Utility Engineering: Reviewer made no comments.
Parks and Recreation: The reviewer made the following comments:
1. There are four (4) main issues that need
to be addressed by the proposed
development. The most important issue is
the City's Springbrook Trail System.
Lesser, but nevertheless important issues
are the development of the City's Wetland
Park directly south of the site, a small
scale on-site active recreation facility
and finally, the requested reduction in
parking.
2. The City's Springbrook Trail System is
the main north/south pedestrian and
bicycle separated right-of-way trail for
the Valley. Construction of a section of
this trail system would be the most
important off-site mitigation measure the
project proponent could undertake. This
project should develop a site plan that
takes full advantage of the trail to the
east and the proposed Wetland Park to the
south.
3 . The applicant has already proposed to
install a shower facility, which could be
complimented by an on-site active
recreation facility, such as a workout
room, a half court basketball area or a
tennis practice backboard.
4. Finally, the applicant could presumably
address the above issues more effectively
if the parking requirements were reduced.
However, even if the applicant does not
see it in those trade-off terms, it is
still a reasonable request which this
department supports.
Building Division: No comments.
Zoning Division: Reviewer provided the following comments:
1. Substantial Shorelines Permit is now
exempt.
2. Should a trail system be developed within
or near the 40' wide wildlife preserve
along the west side of existing
Springbrook Creek.
3. Include passive recreational amenities,
seating, picnic tables.
4. Replace Vine maple in wildlife planting
area with larger canopy type tree. Also
include berry type plants to mix in with
the proposed plantings.
Building and Zoning D irtment
Environmental Review ..u. umittee
Staff Report
Lance Mueller & Associates
December 9, 1987
Page 5
•
Policy Development: The reviewer made the following comments:
1. What is the source of the 47,400 cubic
yards of fill?
2 . What measures will be taken to protect
Springbrook Creek from any potential
contaminants during construction?
3 . The manufacturing park zone requires a
unified theme and substantial setbacks
and landscaping requirements. Does this
proposal adequately meet these
requirements?
4 . The applicant should be required to sign
a restrictive covenant prohibiting the
development of the greenbelt area.
5. Pedestrian linkages should be provided
between the project and the proposed
pedestrian trail along Springbrook Creek.
6. Does this proposal really need 285
parking spaces for the anticipated 80
employees? Perhaps some of this parking
could be eliminated and replaced with
additional landscaping (which would be
more in line with the policies and intent
of the manufacturing park designation)
and on-site passive recreational
features.
7. Additional information should be provided
on the number of trips/day.
8. Will the applicant participate in the
Valley T.I.P.?
F f,
OF Re�
A
4�•6 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
$ ® z
DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING � . 235-2631 •
rn MUNICIPAL BUILDING . 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
tr
134
0,941
1-
-0 SEPI°4‘ P•
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR c".e...y r1p s 'kiroN
MEMORANDUM
' 8V19198l
DATE: November 18, 1987,
TO: Building and Zoning Department
FROM: Bob Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor
SUBJECT: ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS DEVELOPMENT at S.W. 17th St. and
Flood Control
I have several items that should be addressed on the Alaska Distributors
development along Springbrook Creek north of S.W. 27th Street.
1 . 100-year flood plain elevation - There are three FEMA maps for this
area. It has been the Public Works intention to use the worse case
elevation recognizing that the three maps are based upon three different
flood situations and P-1 configurations.
100-year 1981 FEMA Maps - 16.0 to 17.0 (average = 16.5)
100-year 1983 FEMA Maps - ' 15.0 to. 16.0 (average = 15.5)
100-year 1987 FEMA Maps - Shows elevation 16.0 at S.W. 16th St. and
end of map update should expect 16-17 at
Alaska site.
2. Springbrook Easements - The Alaska Distributor frontage along
Springbrook Creek requires additional easements for flood control and
maintenance. The creek bottom is within the Drainage District #1 40'
right-of-way. However, their easement does not extend up the bank, nor
does Drainage District #1 have room to dredge the channel, from the
bank. Public Works needs:
a. 40' wide drainage/utility/public access/landscaping/ and wildlife
along the east edge of the project;
b. a 20' wide maintenance road and easement, outboard and west of
Springbrook and the 40' bank easement;
c. additional 50' Utility Maintenance Easement over the driveways and
parking lots of the Alaska Distributor site - outboard and west of
Springbrook and the 40' bank easement; OR
d. 50' wide Maintenance Easement along the north side of the property
along the P-9 right-of-way.
.
1 -
Building & Zoning Department
November 19, 1987
Page Two
3. Flood Plain Compensating Storage - Under our old, existing Flood Plain
Policy begun by Dave Clemens, the previous Policy Development Director,
and confirmed by the City Council , all filling below the 100-year flood
plain must be compensated by digging out an equal volume below the 100-
year flood plain. If this site is subject to a flood plain elevation of
16.5, all filling below must be dug out somewhere else. Public Works
recommends digging out some portion of the P-1 Channel that is owned or
controlled by the City.
Phase II - New fill of 30,00 C.Y. - compensating storage must be dug
out.
Phase I - New fill of 17,650 C.Y.
plus 11 ,100 C.Y. displaced by building
plus 8,150 C.Y. moved from mound on site to fill
low areas.
36,900 C.Y. compensating storage must be dug
out.
66,900 C.Y. TOTAL. This is equivalent to
digging 2580 L.F. of the P-1
Channel outfall section.
Thankyou.
1D.7.20.REB:mf
.."iG9'9i,<J,w/ o -' V
•
•
REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS _,) f
I L L: ri'' ''7 19b?
1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION
NAME A/ys4-.8 �is-T/4/�via.ES
U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD
ADDRESS s. Gem• a/ T7/ si FIRE MGMT AREA
2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE):
I - II IV III V
FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED
(NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW)
3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: /7;, soo FT2 (A)
NUMBER OF STORIES:
TOTAL BUILDING AREA: /7-..
4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE I1, USING AREA (A): � 017-, GPM (B)
5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: -- —
IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B)PM (C)
6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C):
CIF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) 6 , ac-a GPM (D)
7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: _3 , Uc'G • GPM CE)
CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY
AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD).
8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT;
USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF
THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT:
SEPARATION MAR. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ.
11
0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH 76 , ADD /0 %
3 20% MAX. EAST v2 Go ADD %
31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH • 70 ADD /,D $
61 -100 10% MAX. WEST .3o ADD ,&O 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT
150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : /49 %
(TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJUSTMENT: /i/ce GPM (F)
9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT:
CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: �� GPM (G)
10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED:
(IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM)
CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) '
CD+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: SAC GPM (H)
1. SIGNED: I_V-A" F/�e�r.,�.® ,
I.ATE ~%s��.,• �� /2/7
/ .
11/
2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Z}--{ I I'Elc�
DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: Novem* 1 f} 87_,._:
EFC - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Land Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors—office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1) a Site Plan for
Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq_ ft warehouse
with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2) a D,pecial permit for fill and grade to
L tO. pgevelo47 4 00pCub c,yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly_idest of
S ri pok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172.500 sq. ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth
2) Air
3) Water _
4) Plants
5) Animals
6) Energy and Natural Resources
7) Environmental Health
8) Land and Shoreline Use
9) Housing
10) Aesthetics
11) Light and Glare
12) Recreation
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation
14) Transportation /
15) Public Services `✓/
16) Utilities
COMMENTS:
101111. 1111"
We have reviewed thi lication with particular attention to those areas we
have expertise in a ha e identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional informs cn is ded to properly assess this proposal.
C - /0'./ fr /672
Signature of irector or Authorized Representative Date
Form 4
RENT* BUILDING & ZONING DEPA1MENT
DEVELOPMENT APPUUC TI iiN { REVIEW -SHET .. .,
ECF - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I
of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 .cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION :
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek.
TO:
LI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
® ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
Ed
UTILITIES ENG., DIVISION
® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
Ei POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DOTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING, PLEASE. PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P .M. ON Novcm►bPr 1 9,1987
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : [ 47/_.1Ty1 4i1/4-114//c4E,,EzlNCo
ri APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 11 NOT A• '•.* ' I
10
1114
[UTILITY APPROVAL S1""' , i� � �'
LATE COMERS AGREE:: A)# TEr A/0 _
LATE COMERS AGREEc::, sgwoe Az.
SYSTEM DEVELOPMEIIT C . ()Wm' _ . d.G24/SQ.FT st 6-8e.), ?SCoa 4.23,a 38.5-V
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT L..._.; . SEIJet y, s 40. D¢/// /' // = `a3, c: .3 S`.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA(�::'.::, a tsi:i'i
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA C i:; T -SEVa No
APPROVED WATER PLAN y,,Es rd APIleveo .S ✓6,0g
(6-416,&1054_. l4
fAPPRAPPROVED SEWER PLAN
OYED
FIRE HYO• .;- OCATIONS D
BY FIR !EFT. YtE'
J,
FIRE FLEW ANALY.IS s
':
1J.
1. DATE: /' / 74r /e7
SIGNATURE OF D` RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
1•\\ REVISION 5/1982
J Form 182
2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C .otryn
DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: November 19,1987
EFC - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors. . Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of i1 a Site Pl r
Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 14.8(000 sq ft warehouse
with a 24,500 sa ft office mezzanine 2) a �8 cg ial �erm�'t or_ fi'11_ and ar_adP to
abitit1apRevelo47 4 00permit,yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial
Located on the north side of S GV 7t Stre _t at the 800 block and_ d_irec y_west of
Sriieok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172,500 sq. ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth
2) Air
3) Water
4) Plants
5) Animals
6) Energy and Natural Resources
7) Environmental Health
8) Land and Shoreline Use
9) Housing
10) Aesthetics
11) Light and Glare
12) Recreation
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation
14) Transportation
15) Public Services
16) Utilities
COMMENTS: •
Sit, 5/INN I)L, `3 0,Ely i tyk ( t? vt i i
2 ,HO tJ L-L Av I R,of l(.. S`' S Y rv- 13� 1DC C(tP c(.11 W 1 1-14"/
sv
C�R- 40 . vJ 10 LA) t._,its L t Fcc_ IZ E S LIL,u t
NL-J6)N G l}� �/v 7 51 OE OF S'p t I nJ(o63RG 1( c›cuce--- Z
10ry C tA,D , pNss p,--/(0yJA-1, � ► ��, �', s
I+'v�, pIC.Nt i t✓v _r
�pL \ K)e, av\NoUe pLNv-i(EiN) PeRS
PL Io `To 'if\1` , II ) W 1 I - - 1 is ci
\loirot.ih
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we
have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. „
Signature of Direcit r or Authorized Representative Date
Form 4
RENTON -WILDING & ZONING DEP,- -WENT
DEVELOP ENT APPLICAllikth REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I
of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft' warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill-and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION :
Located on the north side of S.W: 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek.
TO :
fl PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
® ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
r BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
El POLICE DEPARTMENT
® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
® OTHERS ;
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P .M. ON Nor nher 19,1987
•
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; -7)04)I U
Jj APPROVED IAAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED
fV ALiPcC 1_,)01\.)00113 \ LiZ .TES /sclDrJ Co S. ,/, Z.lr.:f
5 i rc-6.1 w' p I-1 L PSG 2css lu45 s G/ S, R
ATIA1Z �PI rJ 51 CIO r s TO i sou sP811,i4-f 6 f pp[-c J
kji=NO UL, P6Z,Old
��--� 77r, V���� DATE
SIGNATURE OF p37PECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
2149N ENVIRONMENTAL, ' CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P��Lr &-
DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, l R 7 COMMENTS DUE: November 19,1987
EFC - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S). : sA-071-87. SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors, .Office/Distri'bution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1) a Site Plan for
Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a. 148,000 sq. ft warehnise
with a 24,500 sct ft office mezzanine• d grade to
LdaftbaPREaclogLIFA'Ym b c•yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines substantial
Located on the north side of S W 7 yj est of
S ri Qok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172.900 sa_ ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth
2) Air
3) Water
4) Plants
5) Animals
6) Energy and Natural Resources
7) Environmental Health
8) Land and Shoreline Use " \
9) Housing
10) Aesthetics
11) Light and Glare
12) Recreation ?�
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation
14) Transportation
15) Public Services
16) Utilities
COMMENTS:
There are four (4) main issues that need to be addressed by the proposed development.
The most important issue is the City's Springbrook Trail System. Lesser, but never-
theless important issues, are the development of the City's Wetland Park directly
south of the site, a small scale onsite active recreation facility and finally, the
requested reduction in parking.
The City's Springbrook Trail System is the main north/south pedestrian and bicycle
separated right-of-way trail for the Valley. Construction of a section of this trail
system would be the most important offsite mitigation measure the project proponent .
could undertake. This project should develop a site plan that takes full advantage
of the trail to the east and the proposed Wetland Park to the south.
The applicant has already proposed to install a shower facility, which could be compli-
mented by an onsite active recreation facility, such as a workout room, a half court
basketball area or a tennis practice backboard.
Finally, the applicant could presumably address the above issues more effectively if `
the parking requirements were reduced. However, even if the applicant does not see
it in those trade off terms, it is still a reasonable request, which this department
supports.
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we
have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional inf mat' needed to properly assess this proposal.
_1.0e07
Signatur of Director or Authorized Representative Date
Form 4
RE 3TP!" BUILDING & ZONING DE{PP"I EHT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval Of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I
of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Develooment permit.
LOCATION :
C
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek.
TO:
[=1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
II ENGINEERING DIVISION
® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
LI FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT .
® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ,.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
LI POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
® OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING. PLEASE. PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P.M. ON NoVembEr 19,1987
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : A' ,ee,c,e .7z%oh
JJ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED
The applicant needs to address off-site park and recreation mitigation issues
the most important of which is the Springbrook Trail.
On-site mitigation should be expanded to include a small scale area for active
recreation activities.
Aesthetic considerations should lead the applicant to develop a site plan and
building design that will relate visually and physically to the proposed public
space adjacent to it.
•SIGNATU OF DIRECTOR R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
/ /
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p..&44‘00,1N
DATE CIRCULATED: November 9, 1987 " COMMENTS DUE: Nover,_19,7}98�7p
EFC - 060 - 87 r i' [.
t
11
. APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-071-87. SM-012.-87 1� -
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller Ass: iatesl d '�, ° �� Fri
k
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors. . Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Alications for axz�ov 1 of 11 a S;te Pla„ fir
Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148. 000 sq_ ft warehcrose -
with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzani'nev• 2) a pecial permit for fill and grade to
Lddiff0PREglogd120pgubf .yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines substantial
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th .$tr'eet at the 800 block and dirertly est of
S ri Lb pok Creek. 13.3 Acres. BUILDING AREA (gross): 172. 00 sq. ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth
2) Air
3) Water tl
4) Plants
5) Animals •
6) Energy and Natural Resources
7) Environmental Health
8) Land and Shoreline Use
9) • Housing l/
10) Aesthetics
11) Light and Glare
12) Recreation
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation
14) Transportation
15) Public Services
16) Utilities
COMMENTS: •
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we
have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional infor ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. •
.� ����� 7V-2 3 i7
Signat of Director or Authorized Representative Date
Form 4
RENT^M BUILDING & ZONING DEPP"MENT
DEVELOPMENT! APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 060 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase T
of a complex to allow the construction of 'a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION :
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek.
TO :
® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ' SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
[=1 ENGINEERING DIVISION
® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
® UTILITIES ENG, DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
RBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
1=1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
flOTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING. PLEASE• PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P .M. ON November 7 9,19A7 .
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Y
fl APPROVED DI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS E NOT APPROVED
•
e ‘P /5 2Alrn 61z-
DATE: //z
SIGNATURE OF r. RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
2149N El____ZONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE, 11 7m
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: e5Arn(t'1P.renY j '
DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 19R7
COMMENTS -DUE: Novembeg19;,1987"
EFC - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors-Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1 ) a Site Plan for
Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq ft warehouse
with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2) a especial permit for fill and grade to
L O PRevelopmg00pC b c.yards. of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines substantial
' Located on the north side of S,W, 27th Street at the 800 block and directly�est of
Sribpok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172,500 scta ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth
2) Air
3) Water
4) Plants
5) Animals
6) Energy and Natural Resources
7) Environmental Health +�
8) Land and Shoreline Use ►�
9) Housing
10) Aesthetics
11) Light and Glare
12) Recreation ✓
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation
14) Transportation
15) Public Services
16) Utilities '/./
COMMENTS: •
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we
have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional info mation is needed to properly assess this proposal.
////,3/87
Signet o Directs or Authorized Representative Date •
•
Form 4
RENTrilm BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT •
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATOON REVIE " SHEET
ECF - 060 • - 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I
of a complex to allow the construction of 'a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION :
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek. .
TO:
El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ' • . SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
2 ENGINEERING DIVISION
flTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
LI BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
DPOLICE DEPARTMENT
OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ii:ii OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P.M. ON November 19,19i97
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
® APPROVED APPROVED W H CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
o-�-- Ste✓ z 7�'„S
/Cc S ✓. �� '� (
•
y) v( a
� f
r i /2/67
DATE:
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
C1TY OF RENTON r
. 2149N E RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE ) 1-� grilIVINM.
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C) i
DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 19R7 COMMENTS DUE: Nove r ,�
EFC - 060 - 87
U NOV 5 1987
. APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) illi l5 E I E
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors. . Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1) a Site Plan for
Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq_ ft warehrm. e
with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine, 2) a _ppecial_a-rmi't for fill and grade to
aiatiollemiA4R0aubivards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial
Located on the north side of S y_Idest of
i '�.gok Creek. }
SI 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172,900 sq_ ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth 1
2) Air ✓
3) Water • Z
4) Plants
5) Animals ✓
6) Energy and Natural Resources ✓
7) Environmental Health ✓
8) Land and Shoreline Use 5 ) 1
9) Housing ✓
10) Aesthetics 4 3) -
11) Light and Glare ✓
12) Recreation
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ✓
14) Transportation �I
15) Public Services ✓
16) Utilities ✓
COMMENTS:
1 . *AAA.. w, 1 hlw at. 9S of-
2 . UMAk bc- +a prot l-
=1=7% Gre-ar. frrwl .4-441 lowevildet..A4
euuel44.3% AntAtt v
i1 MP r-ei e.e.= w.tA.
`rc wAut_ L41.44.44.744-trAutttr
t wr,v . 1Of.dp Ht 14,4,E 194enr).°47414.
"Lel 1°4-41-141
-t .t ►x V-e AA4e. t. 1 .r_.
of- -1-k.e -�—
We hav reviewed this application ALA particular attention to those areas we
have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Signatur: of Director o:, Authoriz-d Raprbsentative Date •
. Form 4
c4‘111E-NJ
11 ? 1 , 41ti
•
1;--1• 14 }-i ';0D1
it.hrisi !) z
! It*.
RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT ! APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, sM-o12-87
PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval df 1)a Site Plan for Phase I
of a complex to allow the construction of a.148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION :
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek.
TO:
® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
® ENGINEERING DIVISION
® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
LI UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
®BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
® POLICE DEPARTMENT
,• POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
® OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P.M. ON Nor inhpr 19,1987
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
El APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED
kitAte 6k art-MIA*,
f DATE;
' f IS I1GNATURE F DIRECTORIfr*1
UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
e -
C 7�d
2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET FI � , !1
.'I H 11 :: li
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Tire , 4 „19a.16-','= f!
DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: November' 19,'1987v
EFC - 060 - 87 �F . n.::a'a,;:.,..,
APPLICATION NO(S). : sA-071-87, sip-o12_87 d 7, 1-`.1, F5 F \1,7 i 3 ,1
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mu]ler & Assoc tat esl' 4 �''(,CisLI&�eee
pry ,..,ii p:FU• 2�1 •J ,
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors. . Office/Distribution Center ' •
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Apgl,ications for approval of l ) a site Plan for
Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq_ ft warehrnise
with a 24,500 sQ ft office mezzanine• 2) a fip is perm;' for fill ana rr ada to
L Okp evelopment0pCubic.yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines substantial
' Located on the north side27th Street at the 800 black and d;rectly....ldzest of
Srikpok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172,500 sq ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth /.
2) Air r✓
3) Water L.__-
4) Plants _ v _ _ _ . _ _
5) Animals L- -
6) Energy and Natural Resources C.— .77 ,.F F-4:1N7701kil
7) Environmental Healthy �} Di.
9) Land and Shoreline Use " " VD 1.91997 91
9) Housing y'
10) Aesthetics �---- BuiL' `•W I Loi'rtil`3�� PT.
11) Light and Glare ' _ -
12) Recreation
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation _ 2.------
14) Transportation "
x :tiir
'
15) Public Services �''
16) Utilities ` ,,� {
COMMENTS: i SSa 51,.,.;E,LAd- 4 V Tr,,,`;`o,a Y 1�a-4- LoLI ge_ , -e i , 1 j! S ry i c.)7f ,---
/ e.707'
U(1il-p- 14uvse 14 ) 7 b c'n?' !/, ‘ ' yI`'7 .7 ( c�.b, 042
y_
----- -- Al
• - /
f
,' -,T L. I /L i,yv4/f-`' c� J f a ,g 70
r �:
C 7 Z.e /6-q( '2�/(.t_0-e, ) i - ' %•. /Sse.�
,_ t"I—J - '- ,(4 , , . < i/,-;`- -((: d GI t o i s "1,J 7_'2..,c- 1'cLt e e -1-11.Ana
, cJ
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we
have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
(_•>-/-.4-7.--:, -)-9 zr (1-1-
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ! '
I II 5(-a !i Z,-t'L o v.1 S t_.� �/C"J'� 'i)•Y�-,?if J ci.t. d /m n �o S L- . /44,-�% /:-) 6. rL"�t
-���' .aid
Form 4 2,cl t 71 in LLi7/0' e T
f2Ya,,,spov I2///!, 4 a 1.1 c.`'7';4 /7 -5 1r,/ �. c r' <s !':.';,-,%` .
RE 1TC ` BUILDING & ZONING DEPAi `"". °'ENT
REVEL*PMENT PPUUCATION ` iE L49E °{ f SHEET
ECF - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I
of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION :
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek.
TO:
® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
El ENGINEERING DIVISION
RTRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
fl FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
El POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
111 OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING, PLEASE. PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P.M. ON November 1 9,1987
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : T CA FF(c. F_tti1.G I L -J K
El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED
1 ti
/D A S S e., ScS 1'h f I lrc?S r cp le- `I%l a�j cLJ G�• , c: j") //1� i�(rl r
.3D`� --- 1.7 ? 1, /17 1 -723
J 9 s �_ tag,3 se �S `',�?€>^ 4, 2-` �' 7 f L/O) l y
7, e pa-id A v:a, FL,g-r t..r `.a 5S:!.�.C:__�
(
:3r "1.1 I ,l_r {Je: 'L)) ;:.• -p a7: /•;1) `P /_I Q/ rj� ' Ut ) '- v) r✓fir. '_
r C_) S r "t^C i S .) -0 5
DATE: ALP cJ, ) ) ,
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUYHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE /1eP �;4�, ,✓�' ,-7 �.`�
7`) Tires 5 poV�dfio`-, ig e �,-21- ��sJ/- -�' ‘ c4:ev5 11E$ION 5/1982
Form 182
r `,,I! [7 ry,�
2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEEIW.- L' t i
t' fed
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: q/� eir �� E' 01 a�4��
DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE:I November 19,1987
EFC - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-o71-s7; sM-012-$7
. PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates) •
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors. Office/Distribution Center •
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval. of 1 ) a Site Plan fQx__
Phase I of a complex to allow the construr, ion of a 148d00fl s=_ ft warehol,se
with a 24,500' sg ft office mezzanine° 2) a ecia pe ft for fi11 and rg adP to
LdaftiAPREMAMLIV0peub c.yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial
Located on the north sid_of S W 27th Street at the sc10 h1n -k and directl _.uest of
S ri pok Creek. 13.3 Acres. BUILDING AREA (gross): 172, nn ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth
2) Air
3) Water
4) Plants
5) Animals
6) Energy and Natural Resources
7) Environmental Health
B) Land and Shoreline Use
9) Housing
10) Aesthetics
11) Light and Glare
12) Recreation
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation
14) Transportation
15) Public Services
16) Utilities
COMMENTS: •
Nv'e /ut_ 4s cs Uoea. � r�tICC (o re_e-
crow4c y ) J
-L) "4-��1 1. 1 eo c - -YAP,,d v 0-4
•
•
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we
-have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
t
Signature of D° ector or Authorized Representative Date
Form 4
t, RENT^" BUILDING & ZONING DEPA
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF
060 _ 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT' TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I
of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION :
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek.
TO:
El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
ENGINEERING DIVISION
El TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
flUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1:1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
LI POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
r1OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING. PLEASE. PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 e 00 P.M. ON NoVemhPr 19,19A7
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : oie_
APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ® NOT APPROVED
� �✓ /Grt�--�77 DATE: 77 7 87
SIGNATURE OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
Mikn'O
•'9
't
2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE ' i � 3' !' \''
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P("eMerN4 Nr\ , �
DATE CIRCULATED: November S, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: Novemb19,1987
EFC - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors •
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1 ) a S;te Plan for
Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 1 48,00n sq_ ft warehouse
with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine. 2) a Drpecial permit for fill and grade to
L tillp'nrox 47,400 Cub c,yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly_west of
S ri Qok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 1.72.900 sq_ ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth
2) Air
3) Water
4) Plants
5) Animals
6) Energy and Natural Resources
7) Environmental Health
8) Land and Shoreline Use
9) Housing
10) Aesthetics
11) Light and Glare
12) Recreation
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation •_
14) Transportation
15) Public Services
16) Utilities
COMMENTS: •
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we
have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da
Form 4
- • RENTS--- BUILDING & ZONING DEN - MENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 060 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I
of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill' and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek.
TO:
® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
LI ENGINEERING DIVISION
El TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
LI UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
[' OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING. PLEASE. PROVIDE COMMENTS TO. THE BUILDING. & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P.M. ON • Novsab r 9 t987
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI ON :
El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Ei NOT APPROVED
.�. S-Soo �n
o oz � -4-, & 7/ '
:24744.(4;c/- _.,64;iKe0 .-17/-eAcs
feej,,reA6'',
-,);_fiZ42-7/ a-free/
DATE: j)u.• G, / ,7
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE /
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
LANCE MUELLER LL, TUT OF UQLaummonrQEL
ASSOCIATES/ARCHITEC1 5-
130 Lakeside Suite 250
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 DATE JOB NO.
(206) 325-2553 ATTE TION
A RE:
!�
TO i of o�% ,�/�� � TJl . - ,
____, .%.,
0 ' -,_,___. -77 ;-i \' 77 , .=,
11
dl ..
£'",,at 9i r-::'f`: 7t 'i r'.'r: sli-P�B.
... .11, LI
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
—
❑ Shop drawings 0 Prints ❑ Plans -� Sampl s 0 Specifications
CI Copy of letter 0 Change order ) , ,,S' p.
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval
El For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution
IX As requested ❑ Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints
/ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
i
REMARKS
COPY TO (�
SIGNED:
PRODUCT 240-2 (es/Inc,Groton,Mass.olait. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
/
11
LANCE MUELLER } Lairug OF linkmen oirum
ASSOCIATES/ARCHITEC... .
130 Lakeside Suite 250
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 oAT NO.
87
(206) 325-2553 ATTEN .ON 6` �
Ad
i 2.) / RE: I % GL i �//l±TO .
l
WE ARE SENDING YOU D Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Shop drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order 0
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
Ie• &y$cd' j — A I, G I, ewie.,
6 Do ' &-,c de e Gar- --e 4 3
,Dege-et,/d'b-A074 6-, 7 .7.4.,e 74-
1
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution
— 0 As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints •
For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS Vit(f2 2 /
r&/./e kW -7 'e Aied -531:W.5" ‘1A.%/1?-04/...:L 3C6"74..‘--
Ze.. t r ,641 s �- ----- s i U arezagia-4
l/0 /-iti. ,4i cex * Ai
* __17,e.."ell
/ it'd/ zratl' 19.4, • * — Q,o -/ 71-- 0.‘44..., .
1 COPY TO Pd-- .
_ SIGNED:
PRODUCT 240-2 /rVEsJ ice.,crown,Mass.01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
J
lance mueller
& associates
architects
October 22, 1987
CITY OF RENTON
Building & Zoning Dept.
200 Mill Avenue So.
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS
Dear Sir:
Alaska Distributors is an office/warehouse distribution facility
designed for the distribution of merchandise to Alaska via
truck.
The project is two phased - phase 1 is the south portion of the
site including the new proposed structure with surrounding
parking and truck maneuvering.
Phase 1 consists. of 148,000 s.f. warehouse with 24,500 s.f.
office mezzanine. Future development will include another
140,000 s.f. of warehouse and 24,000 s.f. of office mezzanine.
The building is constructed of tilt-up concrete panels, dryvit
over-hang above truck loading doors and insulated tinted
exterior glazing. All concrete and dryvit to be painted in warm
earth tones.
Phase 2 is the north portion of the site where future expansion
is to occur. For the present, the site will be filled to
parking lot elevation as shown on civil drawings. Phase 2
should be under separate permit from phase 1 , but run
concurrently.
The site plan will feature significant landscaping and parking
for 229 cars (owner wishes to reduce this to 115) .
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sine =
SOCIATES/ARCHITECTS
r ri
Patrick Kerr r
PK:nk
OCTO
CU I NG/ZONING DEPT.
130 lakeside• suite 250 • Seattle,washington 95122[2061325-2553
lance mueller aia,eel•senior associates:robert olschewsky,eileen furney
associates:robert fadden,michael galbraith,richard harnish,robert wells
a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by and under the supervision of registered architects
PC
P5.001
NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE
BUILDING AND ZONING , DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY
DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS:
DESCRIPTION: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A 148,000 SQ. FT. WAREHOUSE WITH A 24,500 SQ. FT. OFFICE MEZZANINE AND SUB-
STANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITHIN 200 FT.
OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. ;
ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS
FILES: SA-071-87, SM-012-87
GENERAL LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 27TH STREET AT THE
800 BLOCK AND DIRECTLY WEST OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK.
•
PUBLIC APPROVALS: 1. SITE APPROVAL
• 2. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT
3. BUILDING PERMIT
The application can be reviewed at the Bulding and Zoning
Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments
will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during
public hearings. For further information on the application
or dates of final action by the City, please contact the
Building and Zoning Department at 235-2540.
Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the
Renton Building and Zoning Department.
Ronald G. Nelson
Building & Zoning Director
CERTIFICATION
I J ER eI F. L.1 r.1D HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1i4iie,6
COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME ON
SEPlEMf5ElZ 3 ,19 81 ,IN -(HKEe, CONSPICUOUS
PLACES ON OR NEAR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED
BY LAW.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington
residing in AL'',E4-1 , on the yth
day of ,('C�%E' J i3&-2
)M L�c� SIGNED: .W✓1(J�
•
±' CITY OF RENTON
ogIL ammo
w _ BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director
August 11, 1987
William S. Tsao
2201 6th Avenue
Suite 1008
Seattle, WA 98121
Subject: Michael R. Mastro Lot Line Adjustment, S.W. 27th Street
Dear Mr. Tsao:
The Renton Building and Zoning Department is in receipt of the above
referenced application for a lot line adjustment between two lots. We
understand that this is desired to allow the firm of Alaska Distributors
to locate a new building along the eastern side of the property.
As the adjustment you desire involves shifting the common line between
Lots 1 and 2 a full 90°, this cannot be construed as a minor adjustment
under the City's lot line adjustment procedure. This is a major
reconfiguration of the lots.
The method for a major readjustment of property lines is to have the
property replatted through a short plat process. This method does
require more time and is costlier, but can be done concurrently with the
pending site plan approval application we have with Alaska Distributors.
We are therefore returning to you, your lot line adjustment application
and check in the amount of $100. 00. If you wish to pursue this matter
through the short plat procedure, please let us know so that we may
assist you with the proper forms and steps in accomplishing the replat.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to
contact either myself or Jerry Lind of this office.
4401
Do . rickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
DKE:JFL:csb:dskl
LtTsao
Enclosure
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540
•
•�. '1,480 CITY OF RENTON
gams
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director
August 11, 1987
William S. Tsao
2201 6th Avenue
Suite 1008
Seattle, WA 98121
Subject: Michael R. Mastro Lot Line Adjustment, S.W. 27th Street
Dear Mr. Tsao:
The Renton Building and Zoning Department is in receipt of the above
referenced application for a lot line adjustment between two lots. We
understand that this is desired to allow the firm of Alaska Distributors
to locate a new building along the eastern side of the property.
As the adjustment you desire involves shifting the common line between -
Lots 1 and 2 a full 90°, this cannot be construed as a minor adjustment
under the City°s lot line adjustment procedure. This is a major
reconfiguration of the lots.
The method for a major readjustment of property lines is to have the
property replatted through a short plat process. This method does
require more time and is costlier, but can be done concurrently with the
pending site plan approval application we have with Alaska Distributors.
We are therefore returning to you, your lot line adjustment application
and check in the amount of $100. 00. If you wish to pursue this matter
through the short plat procedure, please let us know so that we may
assist you with the proper forms and steps in accomplishing the replat.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to
contact either myself or Jerry Lind of this office.
Do rickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
DKE:JFL:csb:dskl
LtTsao
Enclosure .
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540
—— — as
, A 36
z L' se
31
�� i 1 z c'- - I e - I �o
II
�M NO. 4�, - - - �.W. 1t TH
I 1 SY I -- 3 2 1 0r34-:Sr . ai 1
6 - —5 - - 4 \ G-,
°
u
Q
J 41 7 1
Q
.} ,E.a1s
tle
r — 2
Ig
11
— - �1 I
I -
i.
1
P . . Iijs —
-LL � • ___ — au).. G�14 D 51
77SobJ€C1' 3' ,I,1It
oI 1 I3 �t
j, w �
=�
1 I . Ski 7 _‘
I e
S.W. 27 77-1
`.2)-7:
0
t1
G ®I I I I
1
r 1
. • IZ II 1: 10
I
1 2 I 1 \
•r di SII
I
I I u , 1
I II I I
7 8O9 z
+ ;
;
I d
i- '—
ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS (LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES) .
SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-071-87
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM-012-87
APPLICANT LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES • TOTAL AREA 13.3 ACRES
'
PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 27th STREET.
EXISTING ZONING M-P (MANUFACTURING PARK) '
EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED
'PROPOSED USE WAREHOUSE' AND OFFICE USE .
- COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION
COMMENTS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 27th STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK AND
DIRECTLY WEST OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THE APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE A SUBSTANTIAL
SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL. .
i ' \ f-.1 . 9
4O
+'^ NO. 46• , �W 1 lam •I
-II , �i 1 l 1 01 —4 1 I
61
J i• ® l7 Ih -- ,- --=L ,e1
i tp __-LC
w —�" alai r-- t
1 —N 111
y
J 3-
�I 9�f 11
,at . 1 s
rid
i ,A 7 . 1, o .6 ', 1
,p A , j, A4 5/ere a , /A '
QI /l+
,1 i .+`
F r 2
3.115,2,_ ___s_f_.,-,,.,,,,,I.,4 0 4 ,
, \
�FM>Mu ---2-T TM J f.
I
I +
I
© ` P I i Iz II to
It5 '?9r#i sr ,
a
n/
I I , I
II I 7 8 9 z
I I I
I I I i +
II
ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS (LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES)
SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-071-87
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM-012-87
APPLICANT LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA 13.3 ACRES
PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 27th STREET. '
EXISTING ZONING M—P (MANUFACTURING PARK)
EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED
PROPOSED USE WAREHOUSE AND. OFFICE USE
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION
COMMENTS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 27th STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK AND
DIRECTLY WEST OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THE APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE A SUBSTANTIAL
SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
4
Al
t
s4-- — —GIs'"
C L I — .G PLANT SCHEDULE
te: 1 f, '' I %., \_ >i. pl.q,lus fcEwrwa/La;no0 w1sJlE 2."CeL. ;n o m
.. - -. - 7= :I —\ a en FiEUGbT54E}.-Ifalxslyl/U%44•s pIR C'-6' o ; �'9
• u :1 — © rw 15ucy.NElera MYU->/LIE aI1 -11acx C•e' v ``�
40' d .I 1 = o •D, pbpuLus rr..1-(u..N,c-,a:/�Hew+.�'po o'-Io
G i' ?,r,1 :I 1 O
�_ - I �.,` _• ; :s O 61 .CPA UPrullalu,•I/vnlE W.PLe 6'-9 9-I .WN•
Ia1 1 '� —j op •r. yD 54oNyH,Le A....1••/2Dwl1Ny E 44 15'-le'
��1 I b 40 am 61 pHanNlw .A.5m/1'Nof 4L s Cy.a. nu<+lT
FBhre BLAIdslp Expansion,., I • _ = i? Rxa 46 AC6Llq c}ti.1 JIpLG /Ate-v s CAN.
in r1. — — �� .. Lard.-15 5TEa 11.cuF..�" -I'POTS .50'o.c.
a
�. 1 — -\�Q \,:1:': p Eeen. Nru ' W wTTLEyy , q'MIS al.o.c.
Ijl 1 __ — Wppl&1vY
C1 _ ••
•
a Gam.
AI I
;, I —a NOTES
Cr
ml I - 4od4ecr. me.rt-r .v".c
RIOT I
QI - e aw u-(vauh aurora—zee.).coo."
eaw/ \ - ytaii3O•-;me cahiauous utiP-.R-ivaF}
_ w.c rtxnny ancci.i.-
" '. - —\ - IL., o w a s as o+a. (xt eera..l
—IP.15, - caw-cps r•o.r-+r .S. eu y.n
N ..r LAW,.Nun1r.
Ir. - •,uu
y �:� .....r.2...�t...4. CO)
_`' - ALL 1..No3,-Ars..R , RF •s .WTcw.iic lv.Gp no.l. CC
a
ID
G -9.4
ZZ
b' ` 0© O
- ycs (A
(n _,00Ei
l it —,»,®' rYW-wrN Lw.411.4• a
1s1 —,s 44) un-1 eWp P.M.04511.C, %/ fib
lik `�'C'��R --owo w 1 4ZEb bfCG•-.1PE $.
CO ... g
jj \'. au lazy-04, •h'+N67 b.7i f�
eww 1•WaC•fiiWr b•APplo+r N
1I, — ; it eer. P awH rxotavl
pp =,••0 (Y••= trpw + ) Q m
I
b 0® I P'+w++�i war w a 5,111.1. 1 m
11 •p rnu.« • watrva. '®
- •:pp raxw+ixen0lrox go- ;w,aN.rPLLrwtUP4-
V. — �u „f ry=.1.11 ;hu^a*OpWtY
al _—.\ 0 I ao 7.
r-
'{" {�7r
yy .oCri'( L'l ;p @pc:IF:, o
„up
rtrCrmn.ynr,Ce - —1� Awr:,�r:`t'EK E.. 1F�t STAKING&PLANTING DETAL. ..... ID 03 p
peanp • .?i} _ TREE IN PLANTER BED . ..:.w
I 7•"
1 :' I I I leii 'IIIIJ ( _III �'r1III !! ' � ! :pl • Ik. s�e:1•-ao' `� ®p
S.J 27th STREET �-FLut e• co•.la1.l •q.r-Lr ® .,...
EARTH ENTERPRISES
L-1
• vmmenin...yr
GENERAL NOTES
--
' ..7.17:n V.:2".Lt..".11,1rX:,',.f.V.T..":.=..°,7;•:,,;
....,.,.
1 . .
'..3 !1 1 2. .11 ut11100 to 0•pot or abls Eat.,
----__.-_. ;•1 .y.----.--,--_.
-_-
.
i.IA..0*.I.prra'no 1! ,•-•, ,_ ____--- -—___ ananana up an.---------- •'-----------------.1 L--- ' •
r-1
• e............,..r.,....“..,. ‘,.,:,...”.......
L L ,
to 0
•L'olTse:.=orr"'""""""*. C"""."""r.t"""""""""'""'
It.LI Bite....taaor.s.a..tadv,s‘brY,.......,,.....,•••,... '74•
ino..,••looir•Ca..1.0*to to 0.•.0...a ..i., i. i,.,
1 .
. i
•, . In.1.a,..r.:.:!,'..•ruia............1.....er.........ansaa nem, g ',a.
•••'-= ‘•'_...= P an.a.eatat.na...n.no ma.0.a nas apern..1.
Il a 1",-00_020,02i2,6•00.04,101_ - .
- 1 •
- .
91_ 9 4 ....,.ta.,a•0.0 0.00.
.- : • Ui
g oz. .
_ a 0
0 _?.I —
— -. ,•.1:',.-c:'•----------'="7:Jr,7,71;%:•••,., for 210.3 n <
... .
111
...5 .,a .=A
,-,-,_
11t1t --)-- '--- .
Lou z
- .
0 c,4 —
—
1 ; •
. .-
t I -0- 7
.i....7. Z,
4 - a 0
si ,,......,-...,.,.......-..
MAP
7,..:.;.1:4:7:::::,441; ti,,,,z,rigg45:_i,x,.:i...-.• ,ii,....,,44:),11,.."' g =
VICINITY
N
.., sn ,
a
I • -- : - •••',.., ._ • f tO..-Lt 1 cc
. i
:
N
•I s- _
'• .,
r•NY
N • •••• ..Jle,'%1RiFIK {Mk 1?)--." qtY•li .. q 3IT'S • eLno,_t-r... . —...% h*.'''' 1 1- . -
, - L
-•
-*_I'-i4 . : t \1--•• 63 ri.,..,
............w• C.%
1 __-:
---1 ________-It_
_
'• -,7-• a *,,,E.Fal
—I •-..'i '--- '"^' .1..-$'':'-'' /.
.,,,
i .1''" qh........-:-*:stk—. --- q u)
. ../en• 19 Z 1 .Z. -
--
__ -.
'‘.4::•?..1.,•.Yr••••
1—,
-r-'
.
.-
-.. , 1
I$
04;„1'4. MIMIC ••°00
-I-- '
. ,._-.4 ..... ,1 1., 1 i
..:,:
a
1-3. ,. 7
_ — ___ : -i= • -4----'
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
i:
I-- •
i 7- rut rm..as tee ann...a.•aaea ea a.......n,....,••••••.••a
:7=2Z:•=12attai::::."".''"""'..'"."." CZI IP,
t 1
—...1.4 da•e' pi... ..,b•b• ,,. „•_,
[ca.et Om 000.1 son.of 01.1200.1
'. •4 , .ea 0000.00,•11••0.11•I to ••••00.22,... . 1
' •,! • '
••..0.=a14.re•I•lart I.1.1.0.1.080 G.lil•C I
.1, . •-
, _1 III 111,11 1111 ..,. 111 III 1 ill 1 :'..:T,T , , ititItIbl.), -, .
...
—.....-7.init7:51'.11.:F.E'.11'i'7:::**".:Tt."-.--"..:',"1.1.1. -').3g i
3 r_01-19 ,•.i -- 1 9.9•..1.9 4..; .r,;_a_4_, .i.,...4,...4...4_
3•,-; :
•
Z i
•,, ,.. . ., ,,,../ 0.,•_•_",__11 ... ••.-,•..:. ,:j ,,,,,,i,....... "--.2::::::';::,111,t.---,::17 r,2".V.:7:1:::." E5 :
._ __• - ..
•... . • .,L"ki 1,Liii!wo_H.J. I ;I! u.1111W L11:11,11111 . ,. .....—..........HO••••I 20 GA--
Zra•""lart!'0'..1::!::•::1:r0":%"17:•".1"Vrrol:::•VIr-P"Lot •Gl 5 CI5 .
el 1
T ..r1:-.11.";1•.•...''''... 1
.7.
IF.E.••••.010 of.100. _l C
, "_;.‘'4.1.I. "". • ____....'_'.__...,_or,.'.o'.r.4.,.1.'„rx,.../.,......."....rz.
..,.,.."....,..,.”......, --,".,9..,t-..7"-'"--"----______ .1,.1... "••.••••T:;%....„1.0.1101.101.00 02016 be...rb••e tt•0.
aL1--,-
- [:M.L.L0 0:.0:. 1 m.or.. ge . b
S‘ 27th STREET , e..IV.c0I11. rP.,---,.. x..... „„...-....... ,-'" 0
---,
1
•
I
-r-
9
I1 ICI, // 1
1 t — -a
1 0 :1 1 i i fro „. I: t
• n CA '— 0 9a d,//
k l r-0 r a PO d
T I, e a ra 1 `\ --ea::
) I r
.- 1 -a 00 \ / \ -° '-'1 ,--
�R1, s Pxm I � 1 -
DO
.� I sI` / I'1, 0 I
1, 11 _�.... ,. \ __ I '
Io-- -i11I1Q�I;11� --Q——10•• i P
4.
/'i,(1.__)
gr-_.ail s r z . " 6 0 V. o f '
E-T�--Iii f mm-L,
' II - o
i a` r
'ry f,.
Fl
rf4 Aa ////��
0 �•
i
I •: LI sdw,,,T•C 61ae01"6 4 � r•-.iY PLUM ��. _
g' 4 ( > a 6.P. o i s i .i our'e s : BUSH,ROED&HITCHINGS,INC. 1�p°4' —
clvacnmrieeass LAND Surrvirar+s SEAL •
�w
$' "� Re .'",WawsN6r6" BRH «•n.„„
OF R4.
U,„
0 q7 SEP�Euxe
OF PENDING
-SITE LAN At ,:.! - PLICATION
ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS FILE #: SA-071-87 & SM-012-87
DESCRI ' LION :
APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO
ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 148, 000 SQ. FT. WAREHOUSE WITH A 24,500 SQ. F.
OFFICE MEZZANINE & SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID
DEVELOPMENT MEZZANINE & SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW
SAID DEVELOPEMNT WITHIN 200 FEET OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK.
GENERAL LOCAT AN "./OR ADDRESS:
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 27TH STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK AND DIRECTLY WEST
OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. S
PUBLIC APPRIVALS REQ . ! RED :
1. SITE APPROVAL
2. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT
3, BUILDING PERMIT
.
PUBLIC COMMENTS .WILL BE RECEIVED
BY THE BUILDING . ZONING DEPARTMENT
ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS
AND }'I URING PUBLIC HEARINGS,
FOR FURTHER 'INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
i
ti�Y. o `"ITY OF RENTC"T FILE NO(S): AVO7 ` -81
0 �;, ' " 6.,.LDING & ZONING DEPARTI..�NT ' `_, " �'8�-
�.N�o MASTER APPLICATION
NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those
items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed.
(Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
APPLICANT I 1 TYPE OF APPLICATION
NAME ��%i / �I FEES
/6intee i7' a/(1`� ,A_s' G . Q REZONE*(FROM TO )
ADDRESS
f3 -
o `� � d/- 5/ /e _? - EJ SPECIAL PERMIT*
CITY/ L ZIP RY PERMIT*
S Qc 6 'I/? Z Q CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT*
TELEPHONE Jffill SITE PLAN APPROVAL .lalP -P'
54 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL �5'�
(V i6) g- ' `-s�3 No. of Cubic Yards:- A-DO
CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE*
. From Section:
NAME * Justification Required
ADDRESS r SUBDIVISIONS:
3 0 L(i 4e S l d 257) D SHORT PLAT
CITY //A. ZIP ' Q TENTATIVE PLAT
SC%C2 /( 9 f/7 Q PRELIMINARY PLAT
TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT
3 a .�- ass 3 . ED WAIVER
(Justification Required)
OWNER NO. OF LOTS:
NAME PLAT NAME:
6/e, 19/5/(?v/,e
ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT:
y�e 5),t4 ,, So' Q PRELIMINARY
CITY ZIP ED FINAL
sea_#/e f/�� P.U.D. NAME:
TELEPHONE
/�„ , - r 7 j// Residential Industrial
C// l Commercial Q Mixed
LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS:
PROPERTY ADDRESS
/ ,tI X 73 Q TENTATIVE
EXISTING USE l� PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY
FINAL
PROPOSED USE PARK NAME:
at P-- 7/ 1�TZf r/ &n NUMBER OF SPACES:
/ Ifft ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 1 Z.+o9-
SQ. FT. / ACRES '— "— }- - ~
AREA: 5 1 1 S / �. OTA`�I � S � S D/
R=. __ CITY O I;y 47(_,1. STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING
DATE STAMP Li L i I° i.. , ' APPLICATION RECEIVED BY:
� `� APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE:
„L.2'i J8 ® Accepted
CD Incomplete Notification Sent On' y:
' r.JG/ZONING DEPT. B(Initials)
'
DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: Cc l a-25'f 1
APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: S (MI aTli1
171 Accepted
® Incomplete Notification Sent On By:
(Initials)
ROUTED TO:
®Building t=1 Design Eng. Fire Q Parks
7t Police 12ELPolicy Dev. E Traffic Eng. fra] Utilities
i.
• REVISED 1-31-84
Legal description of property (if more space.is required, attach a separate sheet).
.i
•
AFFIDAVIT
tA-7-2(cic _ , being duly sworn, declare that I am
1:211.1thorized representative to act for the property owner,Mowner of the property involved
in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the
information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS
��—lI DAY OF dtx
19
,4
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE S ATE OF
WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT
•
,I
(Na of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) Q-5( w0 -tr-
•
(Address) ! (Address)
(City) „ , (State) (Zip)
(xc) 3P;S" _�S�S 3
(Telephone)
Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete
application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in
the "Application Procedure."
Foxm #174
That portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of
Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. in King County, State
of Washington, described as follows:
Commencing at the northeast corner of said Section;
Thence south along the east line of said Section a distance of 180.01 feet
to an intersection with a line parallel to and 180 feet southerly, measured
at right angles to the north line of said Section;
Thence westerly, parallel with the north line of said Section 20 feet to an
intersection with a line parallel to and 20 feet westerly, measured at right
angles to the east line of said Section, and the true point of beginning;
Thence southerly 1074.37 feet along said line parallel to and 20 feet
westerly measured at right angles to the east line of said Section;
Thence north 88°24'48" west 560 feet;
Thence northerly, parallel to the east line of said Section, 1095.48 feet
more or less to the intersection with a line which runs north 87°12'59" west
from the true point of beginning;
Thence easterly, parallel with the north line of said Section, to the true
point of beginning.
EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Renton for road purposes by deed
recorded under Recording Number 8401240272.
CITY OF RENTON
11111 D
JUL 291987
BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
lance mueller
'& associates
architects
July 23, 1987
CITY OF RENTON
Building & Zoning Dept.
200 Mill Avenue So.
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS
Dear Sir:
Alaska Distributors is an office warehouse/distribution facility
designed for the distribution of merchandise to Alaska via
truck.
The project consists of 148,000 s.f. warehouse with 24,500 s.f.
office mezzanine. Future development will include another
140,000 s.f. of warehouse and 24,000 s.f. of office mezzanine.
The building is constructed of tilt-up concrete panels, dryvit
over-hang above truck loading doors and insulated tinted
exterior glazing. All concrete and dryvit to be painted in warm
earth tones.
The site plan will feature significant landscaping and parking
for 285 cars.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
CL Siny
N\
LANCE ,&ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS
Patrick ICerr
PK:nk
130 lakeside • suite 250 •seattle,washington 98122[208]325-2553
lance mueller ele,csi•senior assoclatee:robert olecheweky,eileen furney
associates:robert Fadden,michael geibreith,richerd hernieh,robert wells
a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by end under the supervision of registered architects
LANCE MUELLER [L ETT OF MRSE ITITTIM
ASSOCIATES/ARCHITEC.. S
130 Lakeside Suite 250
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 DATE JOB NO.
(206) 325-2553 A N 17
:
TO (-4 0 RE/rt���jj�
eft srtexi
1VL S/,e( /oez
WE ARE SENDING YOU D Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
5-
.sue itialtel. Zek _ . _T_-
CITY'OTR-is _ - ,ENTO��
-v 1
r) .
,N,?,,N,•.,, ,.... _,
,i-11---J-tiL-2-019974 Jut_3 0-1981
, . ENGINEERING P
-CITY=OFREAT0N
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ For your use 0 Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
® ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS <�
i
__.04f,t a6 -,/�-h1-1
Gei z4e,4e
COPY TO 9,—
SIGNED: 7 i
PRODUCT 240-2 I �Inc,Groton,Rm.0147I If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN
* * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * *
PROJECT TITLE! ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS
APPLICANT: LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES
APPLICATION NUMBER: SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-071-87
The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the
pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City
Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to
site plan approval.
ASSESSOR'S
NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER
Adjoining to West
Longprop Development 510 Rainier Ave. So. 252304-9064-04
Seattle, WA 98144 252304-9058-02
Adjoining to North
Burlington Northern R.R. 2100 First Interstate Center 252304-9019-00
999 Third Ave. 252304-9001-00
Seattle, WA 98104
Adjoining to South (across street)
City of Renton Renton City Clerk 252304-9076-00
Renton, WA 98055
Adjoining to East
Mobile Oil Co. c/o Olympic Pipeline 302305-9084-02
612 So. Flower St.
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Mobile Oil Co. Property Tax Division 302305-9086-00
P. 0. Box 290
Dallas, Texas 75221
CITY OF RENT071
i
JUL291987
BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
ASSESSOR'S
NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER
CERTIFICATION
I, 76�-i�2ict T',c9, hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their
addresses were taken from the records of the Kin Count Assessor as prescribed by law.
ATTEST: Subscribed,and sworn to be re me. a
Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington
residing at . on
the ?5 day of
CERTIFICATION OF MAILING
I, ��fZ1'``( F.LtL)O . hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site
plan approval were mailed on At5(0, 77- 1987, to each listed adjacent property owner as
prescribed by law.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a
Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington
residing at F;AjTc,A) on
the 2 7 o4. day of A-11/�t is I f q8-7
LQ__,2-LcA [ av SIGNED: tA/v►(k.-
F ORM 2013
OF R4,+
EC F: lEf—n‘,D
1 °�1, �% ° Cityof Renton LU: s» o� -Bi
© sP- 06Is -61
mill
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
0,9gre0 sEPTE.
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all
governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making
decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals
with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose
of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts
from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)
and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your
proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the
environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS.
Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best
description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your
knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own
observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know
the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does
not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and
landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the
governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do
them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional
information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The
agency to which you submit this check�,ist may ask you to explain your answers or provide
additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impacts.
Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly)
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be
answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR
NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs),
the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site"
should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Alaska Distributors
2. Name of applicant:
Lance Mueller & Associates/Architects
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Pat Kerr
130 Lakeside, Suite 250
Seattle, WA 98122
(206) 325-2553
4. Date checklist prepared:
July 23, 1987
5. Agency requesting checklist:
Building & Zoning Department
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
October 1 , 1987 begin building construction
February 1 , 1988 occupancy CiTY of FiENTOJ1
'JUL 2 9100
D
BUILDING/ZONING D .PT,
fai7. Do you have any poor future additions, expansions, rther activity related
to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain.
Yes, site plan shows future expansion.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, drectly related to this proposal.
N.A.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
N.A.
10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,
if known.
N.A.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and
the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist
that ask you Ito describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to
repeat those answers on this page.
Natural earth tone color painted tilt-up/dryvit office/warehouse distribution
facility. Ofifice. space has solar bronze insulated glass. Structural fill under
slab with perimeter landscaping and general site improvements.
12. Location of title proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and
section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,
site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you
should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate
maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
See attached.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one); a, rolling, hilly, steep
slopes, mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
2%0
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know Ithe classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
Sandy clays, silty clay and sandy gravel
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
No.
- 2 -
i
e. Describe tht pose, type, and approximate qu ies of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Al/0 do 7
.566 /v/G Dut � � 'to//t6 4 tl= 7/vac
compacted select fill pad) an�12I compact below°h `` a 'ing area.
� J7 � /7 00y �l�i`St `3o,00a�fJ
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, oir use? If so, 7
generally describe.
Temporary erosion control measures will be utilized to contain erosion
completely on site.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces
after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
/o a7 72% of i°/tnSE 0,06
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the
earth, if any:
Containment ditches, sedimentation pond(s) , and hay bail dams or
other means as required to contain on site.
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,
dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and
when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give
approximate quantities if known.
Normal equipment exhaust emissions during construction , as well as
dust (rains should help mitigate) . Post construction vehicle exhaust
emissions from normal car and truck traffic.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emission?
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,
if any:
None. '
3. WATER
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state
what stream or river it flows into.
Spring brook creek/ditch.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)
the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Yes, site improvements and building construction.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site
that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
Does not apply.
C;TY OF RENT O'f
\\T"
0CT221987
- 3 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
4) •.. Will .the prop 11 require surface water withdrav- or diversions? Give . _
general desca on, purpose, and approximately qu ties if known.
No.: .
5) Does the proposal lie'within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on
the site plan...: -
No.
6) Does.the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
discharge.
No.
L
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground
water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if
known.
No.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, a,if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.).
Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the
number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or
humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
None.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) . ; Describe the source . of runoff (including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
Storm water. will .be collected by city approved on site detention
system.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? .If so, generally
describe.
No.
- 4 -
d. Proposed res to reduce or control surfaced, and runoff water
impacts, if any:
See 3.c. 1 ) above
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
':X Shrubs
a grass
o crop or grain
o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other
o other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Shrubs and grasses over 95% of the site.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
Do not know of any.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve
or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
Proposed landscape includes maples, pines, rhododendrons, azaleas,
laurels, ivy, lawn and miscellaneous other local plant material
indigenous to the area. A natural area to the east side of the site will
5. Animals remain undistrubed.
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site
or are known to be on or near the site:
Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other
Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Cc ty mamma I s
Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other rro1TE
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
Do not know.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Do not know.
- 5 -
d. Proposed Ales to preserve or enhance wildli,ny:
Preservation of existing grasses plus addition of new plant
material (see B.4.d. above)
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be
used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it
will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Electric or natural gas for heating, lighting manufacturing
ventilation, etc.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe.
No.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included find*.: plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any:
Comply with Washington State Energy Code.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
No.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
None.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if
any:
No.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for
example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
Do not know.
- 6 -
r 2) What types.evals of noise would be created r associated with the
project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come
from the site.
Construction will generate typical construction noise. Operation
of the plant will generate insignificant noise. Vehicle noise will
include 30 passenger cars + /day at 8a.m. and 5 p.m. , 8 truck trips
per day +.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
•
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Vacant, undeveloped.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
None.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
M-P.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Manufacturing park.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of
the site?
Not Applicable.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"
area? If so, specify.
No.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
70 - 80 including truck drivers.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
75% + of the work force will come from the local area.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
None.
- 7 -
1. Proposed reres to ensure the proposal is coble with existing and
projected land uses and plans. if any:,
Do not know
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
None.
b. Approximately how many units, if any. would be eliminated? Indicate
whether high. middle, or low-income housing.
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts. if any:
None.
10. Aesthetics
i
a. What is the tallest height of anyii proposed structure(s), not including
antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed.
28' - 0" above floor line; 32'' - 0" above grade at dock high doors;
plus additional 3' + to roof ridge plus rooftop equipment. Exterior:
painted smooth concrete & dryvit solar tint glass.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Architectural and landscape desilgn.
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day
would it mainly occur?
Office lighting will be visible at night through the window system.
Site lighting will be provided by security wall pack lights on the
side of the building during hours of darkness.
b. Could light or glare from _the finished project be a safety hazard or
interfere with views?
No safety hazard.
No views at night. 11
j�
r,
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
Existing street lights on both Lind Avenue and S.W. 27th Avenue.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Wall pack lights will be non-glare type.
12. Recreation
^ Y
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the
• immediate vicinity?
Interurban trail .
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
No.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Shower facility can accommodate individual workouts.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state,
or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
None.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: •
-Does not apply
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Entrance drives at south property lines will access S.W. 27th Street
and Lind Avenue.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately
distance to the nearest transit stop?
No: 500 yards + to nearest stop.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate?
Project provides 285 stalls; eliminates none.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
No.
- 9 -
e. Will the prW use (or occur in the immediateity of) water, rail, or
air transportation? If so, generallydescribe.
p
No.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
50 - 60 cars coming in morning and leaving at night plus 5 trucks
during the da and 20 trucks during the night.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or contrortransportation impacts, if any:
None.
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for
example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)?
If so, generally describe.
Police and fire protection - yes; emergency only.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,
if any.,
None. ;
16. Utilities
a. Circle; u ' '= curren ly a ailable lat the site: - tural gas
q - -, telephone anitary sewer, septic sys em, other.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility
providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or
in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Electricity - Puget Sound Power and Light
Gas - Washington Natural Gas I
water, refuse (PNB) , sanitary
C. SIGNATURE
I, th ersigned, sta - .•at to the best of my knowledge the above information is
tr and conj plete. It is ••erstood that the lead agency may withdraw any
de laration of non-sig ' icanc= at it might issue in reliance upon this checklist
sho d there be a ti 1 ul mis •` en ation or willful lack of full disclosure on
my pa
Proponent:
-�< <. ���A';� —maw ><-
Name Printed: Pat Kerr
it
- 10 - {
#176
2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:
DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: November 19,1987
EFC - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1 ) a Site Plan for
Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq_ ft warehcnise
with. a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine;'2) a Dpecial permit for fill and grade to
L6E4ftbkiliaglogMLU0T2 b cc_yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial
' Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and direct1y_west of
SISrigQok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172.500 sq. ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth
2) Air
•
3) Water
4) Plants
5) Animals
6) Energy and .Natural Resources
7) Environmental Health
8) Land and Shoreline Use
9) Housing
10) Aesthetics
11) Light and Glare
12) Recreation
• 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation
14) Transportation
15) Public Services
16) Utilities
COMMENTS:
•
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we
have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date •
Form 4
RENT' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA 'MENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of l)a Site Plan for Phase I
of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION :
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek.
TO:
0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
OENGINEERING DIVISION
OTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
fBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
OPOLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DOTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING . PLEASE' PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P .M. ON November 19,1987
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
DAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED
DATE:
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
l`
Building & Zoning Department
November 19, 1987
Page Two
3. Flood Plain Compensating Storage - Under our old, existing Flood Plain
Policy begun by Dave Clemens, the previous Policy Development Director,
and confirmed by the City Council , all filling below the 100-year flood
plain must be compensated by digging out an equal volume below the 100-
year flood plain. If this site is subject to a flood plain elevation of
16.5, all filling below must be dug out somewhere else. Public Works
recommends digging out some portion of the P-1 Channel that is owned or
controlled by the City.
Phase II - New fill of 30,00 C.Y. - compensating storage must be dug
out.
Phase I - New fill of 17,650 C.Y.
plus 11 ,100 C.Y. displaced by building
plus 8,150 C.Y. moved from mound on site to fill
low areas.
36,900 C.Y. compensating storage must be dug
out.
66,900 C.Y. TOTAL. This is equivalent to
digging 2580 L.F. of the P-1
Channel outfall section.
Thankyou.
1D.7.20.REB:mf
---.</Gig i,,...419 / 0 k' )/
REQU I RCU FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS ) L a! `. ' ; 1I
1/ '‘, 'L—: •c% —7 & 19fil LL:—.J
1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION
NAME /9/f9-s/17 �/s7- /wia.eS
U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD
ADDRESS s_ 2. a7
FIRE MGMT AREA
2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE):
I - II IV III V
FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED
(NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW)
3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: /7,2 Sob FT2 (A)
NUMBER OF STORIES:
TOTAL BUILDING AREA: /7a,S
4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A):
4/ c3-21, GPM (B)
5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: -- —
IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B)PM (C)
6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C):
(IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) 6 , 6cro GPM (D)
7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: 3 , Ur-,G
GPM CE)
CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY
AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD).
8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT:
USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF
THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT:
SEPARATION MAR. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ.
11
0 - 10
25% MAX. NORTH 76 ADD /0 %
30 20% MAX. EAST o2 Go ADD ) %
31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH • 7o ADD /D %
61 -100 10% MAX. WEST
101 -150 a ' �o ADD �b %1 -1OR 4-HR WALL 50 MAX.� TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT
0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : /49 %
(TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJ! TMENT: 3/c GPM (F)
9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT:
CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: �� GPM (G)
10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED:
(IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM)
(IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) '
(D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: 67:5 GPM (H)
.1. SIGNED: -- `` -(3 ____ < 1
I ATE , ��- 4.. /P/%
N
2149N ENV RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE1 I NT n
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Z1- i 1141
DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: Novemb 1 8
EFC - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S). : sA-071-87. SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors. Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1 ) a Site Plan for
Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 14f?.000 �cr_ ft warehouse
with a 24,500 sa ft office mezzanine• 2) a pp cci_al hermit for fill and grade to
L6 tb pgevelo47 4 00pCXb c.yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 0300 block and dirertly_west of
SribApok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172.500 sq. ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth
2) Air
3) Water _
4) Plants
5) Animals
6) Energy and Natural Resources
7) Environmental Health
8) Land and Shoreline Use
9) Housing
10) Aesthetics
11) Light and Glare
12) Recreation
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation
14) Transportation
15) Public Services 1.7
16) Utilities
COMMENTS:
110111611"
We have reviewed thi lication with particular attention to those areas we
have expertise in a rave identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional informs cn is leilded to properly assess this proposal.
it /87
Signature ofiDirector or Authorized Representative Date
Form 4
RENTS BUILDING & ZONING DEPA•MENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATII I . REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I
of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION :
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek.
TO:
[=11 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
® ENGINEERING DIVISION '
flTRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
Et UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
E FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
fl .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
® POLICE DEPARTMENT
® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
LI OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED :'
IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P.M. ON Npremhpr 1 9,1 987
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 0/7LITy >-NtC/L e1/1/4-1 ro
Ei APPROVED flAPPROVED WITH ,CONDITIONS 11 NOT A' ' ''vD- 011(
„.A.11
UTILITY APPROVAL VA SU i n 411F 0. - --' f
LATE COMERS AGREEr AM-TE, ' WO
LATE COMERS AGREE:, SE4)E*"2 NO
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT C:. 4.147E,e �/ gD.G24/50.�:X ,58o JsGd g' Z 3,a 38.',5-V
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT C:;..:.__. .___-.:SE )674. 'I ./ = $o23, .t3 si --�
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA ::'.::;..s-t`:,ti7 ! Ala iI g i/lo, T 7/m. 5/�
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA Ciii -SEWER ,/p
APPROVED WATER PLAN N 'os ,�pxw� a
,y, 5,.. (ems dt{.ss 11.6✓r5io403 -)
r �APPROVED SEWER PLAN
S iZ-ig-f ,� /�
APPROVED FIRE HYD NAMESn
BY FIR EFT. YlEs I jV
FIRE FLC 1 ANALY IS
DATE:
/ / /'r /87
SIGNATURE OF D'aRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
` REVISION 5/1982
�
Form 182
2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Zn
DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 19R7 COMMENTS DUE: November 19,1987
EFC - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S). : sA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1 ) a site Plan for
Phase I of a complex to allow the canstruc i'�n of a l4F3 000_ s_ ft warahnuse
with a 24,500 sa. ft. office mezzani7ie: to
L F roPRE°ox 476n00pC b c.yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th St�Qf at the f3n0 hlerk and c3irPc-tly._west of
S ri pok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172,900 sq. ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth
2) Air
3) Water
4) Plants
5) Animals
6) Energy and Natural Resources
7) Environmental Health
8) Land and Shoreline Use
9) Housing
10) Aesthetics
11) Light and Glare
12) Recreation
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation
14) Transportation
15) Public Services
16) Utilities
COMMENTS: •
Se.,,0:5-1/34'(( L `��flrti�+„Ir� 2-1'VI i S\ Iifirf
ice&) l Lc LA FE . p s oLu t
N O N( 1--lfcV s a p E s p 12.13 C 63l cx ( ;
• C P I 0_=, ��LI +Z�A`-/i Cl (\.)Vae(., e i1.)) �✓s
S Pry I A D 1 ?I CAA t i'crb
epL ce \Jlt\ic lAiNNiOUt bK) t,,J)LS) - - pUk j-1tN6 t accrA
w NI (01 Ci -06N i€f - o j vuow o cc
E,76RSt-(. puskyir- ry\,\A 11\) \-11+ pNipcz-e d
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we
have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,.
Signature of Direct r or Authorized Representative Date
Form 4
RENTO I BUILDING & ZONING DER- —TVIENT
EVEL'S)PIMENT APPLIC SHEET
ECF - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I
of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft' warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill' and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION :
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek.
TO :
fl PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT . SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
® ENGINEERING DIVISION
fl TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
LI UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
J POLICE DEPARTMENT
OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Fl OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P .M. ON Np,r mber 19.1987
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVLSION : 7)O11)ll167.
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS LI NOT APPROVED
histIAC6 (JOr\)00P'3 VLANIV6 TIZIa63 / ON S.v,,?, Z7r!J
rc-i ( U fTli It.-6is 2EkJ /Lei SlgC/ /) 1 : 13 B e',
ftitruk &/L PAR i Cio ,J To R �.1 ��v`c� Ste ���(�� Nop Rw '
M1 O UL%b-i �f" .� u6 Cyr pOu"Y1 l-f
DATE:
SIGNATURE OF ! ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F) Z-
DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 19R7 COMMENTS DUE: November 19,1987
EFC - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S). : sA-071-87, sM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors. . Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approv 1 of 1 ) a site Plan for
Phase I of a complex to allow the co struction of •
14f3.00o scr_ ft warehn,�se
with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine: 2) a ppecial permit for fi'11 end grade to
LdEatilqPREaloggPpS‘Pm b c.yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 8o0 b o .k antl clirectly_zest of
S ri pok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172.900 sq_ ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth
2) Air
3) Water
4) Plants
5) Animals
6) Energy and Natural Resources
7) Environmental Health
8) Land and Shoreline Use
9) Housing
10) Aesthetics
11) Light and Glare
12) Recreation
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation
14) Transportation
15) Public Services
16) Utilities
COMMENTS:
There are four (4) main issues that need to be addressed by the proposed development.
The most important issue is the City's Springbrook Trail System. Lesser, but never-
theless important issues, are the development of the City's Wetland Park directly
south of the site, a small scale onsite active recreation facility and finally, the
requested reduction in parking.
The City's Springbrook Trail System is the main north/south pedestrian and bicycle
separated right-of-way trail for the Valley. Construction of a section of this trail
system would be the most important offsite mitigation measure the project proponent .
could undertake. This project should develop a site plan that takes full advantage
of the trail to the east and the proposed Wetland Park to the south.
The applicant has already proposed to install a shower facility, which could be compli-
mented by an onsite active recreation facility, such as a workout room, a half court
basketball area or a tennis practice backboard.
Finally, the applicant could presumably address the above issues more effectively if
the parking requirements were reduced. However, even if the applicant does not see
it in those trade off terms, it is still a reasonable request, which this department
supports.
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we
have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional inf mat' ' needed to properly assess this proposal.
Signatur of Director or Authorized Representative Date
Form 4
RENTr'' BUILDING & ZONING DEP®'WENT '
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
EC F - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NOBS) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I
of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft' warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION :
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the '800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek.
TO:
® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
® ENGINEERING DIVISION
fiTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
® UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
�1 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
fl .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
LI POLICE DEPARTMENT
fl POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
flOTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING. PLEASE. PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P.M. ON Novemhpr 19,1987
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : AlW4l4ec,,e4K1%Oti
El APPROVED EIAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED
The applicant needs to address off-site park and recreation mitigation issues
the most important of which is the Springbrook Trail.
On-site mitigation should be expanded to include a small scale area for active
recreation activities.
Aesthetic considerations should lead the applicant to develop a site plan and
- building design that will relate visually and physically to the proposed public
space adjacent to it.
�4 DATE: /�/����
SIGNATU. ;27
OF DIRECTOR R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pLkOci4ANIA
rh ,1987
DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: Novpe „1
., , R9,�
EFC - 060 - 873
• ,„„ I �� ^
1 ,
. APPLICATION NO(S). : sA-071-87. SM-012-87 .. o �
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance MuelJer & Associates)
'' `� ' �aJ
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors Office/Distr;b�tion center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications fnr approval of ll a Site Plan for
Phase I of a complex to allow the construci'on of a 148z000 s�_ ft warehrnse
with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill end grade to
Ldaffl . ppevelo47 4 00pCub c.yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial
' Located on the north side of S.W. 27thStreet at the_80n block anc3 directly est of
Sitt igpok Creek. 13.3 Acres. BUILDING AREA (gross): 172,5n0 sq_ ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth ��•
2) Air
3) Water
4) Plants
.5) Animals •
6) Energy and Natural Resources
7) Environmental Health
8) Land and Shoreline Use
9) Housing
10) Aesthetics
11) Light and Glare
12) Recreation
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation
14) Transportation
15) Public Services
16) Utilities
COMMENTS: •
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we
have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional info nation is needed to properly assess this proposal.
� � 317
Signatg - of Director or Authorized Representative Date
Form 4
FIENTruo BUILDING & ZONING DEPik -ThilENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATI N RE 1{' IE ,,:I SHEET
ECF - 060 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I
of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION :
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek.
TO:
El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 1.2/2/87
OENGINEERING DIVISION
LTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
•
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
•
OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
jBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
fl POLICE DEPARTMENT
OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
LI OTHERS : ,
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P .M. ON November 1 9,1957 .
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ,-7;3'6__p -.--
ri APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ® NOT APPROVED
r
/ Gp� /5 2 .f-16€ La � 71—X/4
2IL ( i
��} ' C7.12',', .-----
DATE. 7 z -
SIGNATURE OF RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVPSION 5/1982
Form 182
- •
2149N El____iONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE - ? �'I. .�;
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 65.,Yntre2XIh,Cj i'
DATE CIRCULATED:_ November 5, 1 987 COMMENTSL-DUE: NowPmbeb 404-98T
EFC - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S). : sA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors Office/Di s riIb it"on Cen er •
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: pplications for approval of 1 ) _a_s;tP_ Eaan f_or
Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq ft warehouse
with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine; 2) a ppecial permit for fill and grade to
LadhfrOPREWIAMOPpubi .yards• of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines substantial
Located on the north side of S.W. ?7th . resat thei8(10 block and directly_itzest of
S ri pok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 177,' oo SQ_ ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
• MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth
2) Air
3) Water
4) Plants
5) Animals
6) Energy and Natural Resources
7) Environmental Health
8) Land and Shoreline Use
9) Housing
10) Aesthetics
11) Light and Glare
12) Recreation
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation
14) Transportation
15) Public Services '/-
16) Utilities
COMMENTS: •
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we
have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional info mation is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Gy ////3787
Signet o Directk or Authorized Representative Date
Form 4
RENTrim BUILDING & ZONING DEPP�'"WENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF — 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I
of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION :
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek.
TO:
El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
KENGINEERING DIVISION
® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
® UTILITIES ENG, DIVISION
El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
® •BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
® POLICE DEPARTMENT
fl POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
® OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING. PLEASE' PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P.M. ON November 19,1987
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
flAPPROVED ® APPROVED W H CONDITIONS EDNOT APPROVED
756 ga D Ye raTp✓ �'z�e,-ax/�►� - so rI,.ti"....- O
Ff s /0.,. r'mot.
4/ i tee- v r -- -
f///I/67
DATE:
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
CITY OF IIENTON
2149N E RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE ) ' @ CE I li!] D
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 0:A1 9
DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1g87 COMMENTS DUE: Nove r
EFC - 060 - 87
1.0 NOV 5 1987
. APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87. SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributor (Lance MLelle & Associates lln IC D
Luj
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors— Office/Distribution Center •
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 11 a Site Plan for
Phase I of a complex to allow the constrwtion_ of a 148,000 sq_ ft warehouse
with a 24,500 sa. ft. office mezzanine: ?_) a ppecial mi' _ for fill and grade to
LdifraFREvoelo447 400ACrb c.yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly_mest of
Gnrinrt pok Creek.
Sltt F�Kt�. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172,500 cc'_ ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth
2) Air ✓
3) Water ?►
4) Plants
5) Animals
6) Energy and Natural Resources ✓
7) Environmental Health ✓
8) Land and Shoreline Use �J
9) Housing ✓
10) Aesthetics 4 51
11) Light and Glare ✓
12) Recreation 5
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ✓
14) Transportation LOP
15) Public Services ✓
16) Utilities ✓
COMMENTS:
. hilAdtea tkoc- 4i'/400 ak• 9147 of-
fIAA'7
rwerA74.1.7716— frowl dom-41
etwet.ttis GnyptV ?
3. -Hu, MP real .r.5 a. , AAA.-
wAui_ LitAt.4.42447144t..
reluoviewiti-OzP• Pot+ 414-tot, itovverrod.rat. 44-0Lett-in•tacl
r
.—t4.4 ►x V-ceiww. .A. fv e2' c— A
r-Gifvfri.aAAM-- AtrtteAtAsistA— rek.•iet.4.01,1144-,c
.9{ -t .e X.
aeat- . a
We hav reviewed this application wtparticular attention to those areas we
have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
A Nor-115 , 11151:_
Signatur: of Director o.. Authoriz-d Representative Date
Form 4
• len,A_Gottetkii buotibLayi.47
1;ro-v6uka, A) AA& L V e)GcA- a
-
itit-e- Ma-0471-4- rceL&L,fletoat._ ArotAlAth
IsrevietootervIc., .
114.0772:67-ai tee.a.GUI
(dit-ED V Ike_ I ctos4Atztp•outt.A..
AA/upitudiv ? Poeitotr, " of-
-rhAdiv leA44 e.inALA.
vtoo-utAt... et4L4t,Ildn1k.0,
Lotiti, krint-LA. ht.aye.,
totiZtALd -(A4,t ro-Giscot.% AtAtet..4_,
Af•ut(Aidt" tik-f IselP 41.1.4
ot.it,t.A. 011 • e-At•
fUt.011.4.44417
AAjtAkt-414-A-4 AYVIeLitMArk..d 171eLn41-0(..
plearlAkili-A. FYI -IAA 4r-V-
X441
WIAX, LrriA/C.44,Vt radVti,(A104- CAA--
4Lt. VeUdial 1: 1. P
1
. RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ' •
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 060 • - 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
•
PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ' PROJECT; Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I
of a complex to allow the construction of .a 148,000 sq. ft' warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
Of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION :
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek.
TO : •
® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ' . • ' • . SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
OENGINEERING DIVISION
OTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
UTILITIES ENG, DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
U PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
D .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .
1-_=] POLICE DEPARTMENT
®.POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
[' OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING. PLEASE' PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P.M. ON • Noyembpr 19,1987
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 9I A/.0 17atagritiAttr .
U APPROVED • U APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED
1, *.r.IPAIr iroweleixoLtz
is
,
•
DATE: 6I 1�6�
44(VU
GNATURE F DIRECTOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
. ' •
77' re.
, n :• -
2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET '1 ' - , 1 il ',1'
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: . .
17tre, '
. •
t , W7
DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: Novembe1
EFC - 060 - 87 r'- \--c- r.--.
APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87, SM-012-87 i"--r;) 7 (T.) i-,r; [ \i7 11 rr- )
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller .c _Lissociate'sT' :1 .1.4otift [ li -
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distribu ors, Office/Distribution Center • •
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: spLlatjnafor iatiLasitepianfar_ '
Phase I of a complex to allow the construcionof ä148j)00
with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine: 2) a Dpecial permit for fill and grade to
LdEAfthaPREgiogen20iab permit.yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly_west of
S fflEimWok Creek.
13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172,500 sq ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth
. .
2) Air L.--
3) Water
z...-----.
4) Plants
5) Animals
6) Energy and Natural Resources L.----- Ciqr rtr, F7417rrON
7) Environmental Health C.------ 1-1:-v-L, E D
4.....„- lo a
8) Land and Shoreline Use vavifil991
9) Housing
10) Aesthetics c---
11) Light and Glare '/ - -
12) Recreation . BUI12, ,t'ta I ilui4ittiG Eil:PT.
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation il---- . .*- , ' ..
,•
t---
14) Transportation
t 1r I'
15) Public Services f
16) Utilities .---' , ' b" / •
COMMENTS:
7) i 4 A ss5 .3 53 1'4'1(9 LA+ 47))y Tr ztA.,s• 13 LO 1," 1--a-4----Col-\ .)je_t_., ..,11..i 7.- 0 i• <, .6,t-Lt.- ,,
0 )
7,6
6 i '.:-,"‹,:e--- ' 2:6 .3 °•c' 1',? A r7 7
— x /9 ---- 1'9
4/ 7
. ----------.— A' \/ ,ZiO•'?
if 14b I L/ 2
--------— - - A '
/ 0 o 1 ),-_i
:,-„7),11,.. /1*-1w4(7-
e ,-.,/,4 1,. (
L-'0 -
1-)Y a m cl1 (..'
--Q ) ',- -GP. ril7Z `,::',)/ ci-[--,,-...-/ (. Jic.w--;,-7.7--,---/- .0' -) e./ -7
') '•'
c.--,),) '•:-V- i i',_:' -1--.('-fc ,, ! '.4 i.,4) --,/),-_•,,:; , „, 1_ , rJ /
- 0 -!-- l" l ' ' ,
..,-,.) :/,Y'.. q- / ,41 , / if,--2 --/-)c. ;.( JI,Ae,__( ts -k)-"o\cr,?q,11-ed -1-11_,c)
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we
have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
-L--)-2 _, ,
,I.
/
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
I '1 3ta // :,'-+:1-0 vi 's ki,--e--0--, 1,0,e, 'i)--)r,-.)u)„,!..,,,c1 ci.4 d
Form 4 ascid i -/- rci Li /2).' 1-11(7-ya-L-kspoli-hi/E-,i--, /F..) ..) )1 ,-.7';2i-• /,'.,. -5 /1.,;,,._,7- ';'.[,--•! ,,t/1-;
RENT(' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA ENT
DEVELOPMENT APP UCATIIi0;N REVEEW SHEET
ECF - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I
of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION :
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek.TO :
JJ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
ENGINEERING DIVISION
RTRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
n UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
fl FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
ri POLICE DEPARTMENT
r--1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING . PLEASE. PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P.M. ON _o -mhpr 1 9,1 987
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : T'A FF((. EKG I l\l LIE LE- ) KG
® APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED
/D SSe, S(S Lv Big,, c-1 )i .1/1-1) 4\0/
r f% [7-'7 9 1 J z 3
f�a e lv e ' '62 '7er 4, 44 x 197 f L/O) lU -)
1-bT ��-1nvn� , `a 1 ),
PG 1 4,1
2 F") _r PAY_ ,, _j ,, :7 14 -{? �c .y
i 5 z��r �4.1'c� 7`�re. e1--c,77a'llz-1-1d(-) (� e
DATE: /UP II, )7 l. a 7
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR
I OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE n� f;�, .T. ,, ,�' ,E- e7 :,
�Q U !Cl- �eG
/ � c i S Po of /Q� /� -� ��i 7, /$l-41;?z `�G�eyv� FdEC�I810PJ 5/1982
Form 182
2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEt f• ; `—' La • 4_•
I
t
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: kCli, _
DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, l9S7 COMMENTS DUE: November 19,1987
EFC - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S). : sA-071-87` SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distri;butors, . Office/Distribution Center •
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A i cations for a�oroval of l ) Site Plan for
•
Phase 1 of a complex to allow the constr ct�on of a 148,f)0n ss_ ft warehouse__
with a 24,500. sct. ft. offi'ce mezzanines 2) a �ecial nermi - for fill and grade to
L w` aiDaeveloA7 1-2 Oloubivards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial
' Located on the north side of S.W. 27th_ Streat • . •Ie block and directly_Iaest of
sffEifigkpok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 177.500 sq- ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth
2) Air JIIIIIIIIII
3) Water
4) Plants
5) Animals
6) Energy and Natural Resources
7) Environmental Health
8) Land and Shoreline Use
9) Housing
10) Aesthetics
11) Light and Glare 1111111111!
12) Recreation
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 11111111111
14) Transportation
15) Public Services JIIIIIIIIII
16) Utilities
COMMENTS: •
9 L^)0.S k e�a\w h 1 ✓- 4-1 CC. /LL QS C� U 0 e a- �c 1C- ^jc,, I e �o r e.e c� 1
roc «Jv y 1
zJ -c 11 1 c, 1/ ro 0.1) 041
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we
'have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
- uk,--- Z -- ✓ �- //7-efi
Signature of D. ector or Authorized Representative Date
Form 4
p REt4T°I" BUILDING & ZONING DEPA --MEW
DEVELOP 'wM ENT APPLICATION c' EVIEW SHEET
ECF - 060 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT : Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I
of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION :
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek.
TO:
fl PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
® ENGINEERING DIVISION
flTRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
fl FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
PARKS a RECREATION DEPARTMENT
LBUIL)ING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
A POLICE DEPARTMENT
® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P .M. ON Norpmber 19,1987 0
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : "Pn( ice
ri APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
•
. � XZz) DATE: /7— 7 87
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
TON
�P c z y
2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE V �' f ` r
�x �; iwali
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pr v.e 4 rr\ I,. ," G
DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: November19,19874,4d
EFC - 060 - 87 31011 '
APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87. SM-012-87 151
� �
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller r Associates)
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors— Office/Distribution Center •
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1 ) a Site Plan for
Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 1 4£3,000 sq_ ft warehcrose
with a 24,500 sg1 ft office mezzan' to
Ldaftballilegkson4m,n00AS'ub cc.yards of material on the site; and 3)Shorelines Substantial
Located on the north side of S W 27th r _ a _ th SAS block and directly_west of
SriApok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172.500 sq. ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1) Earth
2) Air
3) Water
4) Plants
5) Animals
6) Energy and Natural Resources
7) Environmental Health
8) Land and Shoreline Use
9) Housing
10) Aesthetics
11) Light and Glare
12) Recreation
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation
14) Transportation
15) Public Services
16) Utilities_
COMMENTS: •
•
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we
have expertise in and have identified' areas of probable impact or areas where
additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
/7 7
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da
Form 4
• RENTS--- BUILDING & ZONING DEN —BMENT •
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I
of a complex to allow the construction of a.148,000 sq. ft warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill' and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of
Springbrook Creek.
TO:
fl PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
® ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
1=1 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
g FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
[' POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
EIOTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO,. THE BUILDING. & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P.M. ON Notenb r l A TAR7
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI ON :
® APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
!� rcG2 ,--..e .-w-;-cf
2 .GGL��/� c .- y .
S-,Soo �n
f �'3"2 ^G� c am ��, --�- �� �_
e.
(/'0
ft
141Z,e, �ti�� /Aso' 30:42,e/
u�. _ ate/ a�' � - a
944eA6'
) •G
DATE: j1w. C, /9;1°7
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE /
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
LANCE MUELLER ILETWE CDF UQ eOSIEITTMIL
ASSOCIATES/ARCHITEC1 b
130 Lakeside Suite 250
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 DATE0R39 • a7 J09 NO.
(206) 325-2553 ATTEVTION
% JC��, /A),Q
//}.Jy'�,� ,(/ RE:TO /,J/�J�/(�/f�Z�J.�/l /���"J
/ 3 - ,` , 1 n/
\J 1I ��
1 l 1 I` I.I�' 2gyp. i`
i
1 I1 I—,it m,
'..I f: 9 I S.
C..
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
—
O Shop drawings ❑ Prints 0 Plans �"�C Sampl s 0 Specifications
ElCopy of letter 0 Change order .S' Mr
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution
As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints
f For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPY TO 1)
SIGNED:
PRODUCT 240-z fi jInu,Groton,Mass.0147I If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
LANCE MUELLER LIET3n OF 11 G°1 MSfi1][117a[i
ASSOCIATES/ARCHITEC'...
130 Lakeside Suite 250
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 DAT JOB NO.
67(206) 325-2553 ATTEN ION
' TO AlLtkt i .. Z(06-77 /71 0/437-7'
I
WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items:
—
O Shop drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications
O Copy of letter 0 Change order 0
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
a 41(SeC/ ,D01...9 — A /, G /, ivrG
& %ei eiude eie Gar- - e 4_ 3
:,-454et-r4-074 d/ ./ e7,c. e 7L.
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
O For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution
Xr
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE _ 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS /
Air-d -$"(/I! 6.ethfiee--4-#:L. -
f<
•
/10 )& Age : *,14.4i 0
/ (-I ye- ep., 7‘- ?Lk le -i-ovi v / yj- 0,44.(.. .
COPY TO Pd SIGNED:
PRODUCT 2442 ( Eaj Inc,Croton,etas otaTt. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
I
lance mueller
& associates
architects
October 22, 1987
CITY OF RENTON
Building & Zoning Dept.
200 Mill Avenue So.
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS
Dear Sir:
Alaska Distributors is an office/warehouse distribution facility
designed for the distribution of merchandise to Alaska via
truck.
The project is two phased - phase 1 is the south portion of the
site including the new proposed structure with surrounding
parking and truck maneuvering.
Phase 1 consists. of 148,000 s.f. warehouse with 24,500 s.f.
office mezzanine. Future development will include another
140,000 s.f. of warehouse and 24,000 s.f. of office mezzanine.
The building is constructed of tilt-up concrete panels, dryvit
over-hang above truck loading doors and insulated tinted
exterior glazing. All concrete and dryvit to be painted in warm
earth tones.
Phase 2 is the north portion of the site where future expansion
is to occur. For the present, the site will be filled to
parking lot elevation as shown on civil drawings. Phase 2
should be under separate permit from phase 1 , but run
concurrently.
The site plan will feature significant landscaping and parking
for 229 cars (owner wishes to reduce this to 115) .
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sine- = .,
v l �n' SOCIATES/ARCHITECTS
4kJ
e r
Patrick Kerr F,•`
,_8_
PK:nk ! _..� 0C12219
,� )
CU LDING/ZONING DEPT,
130 lakeside • suite 250 • seattle,washington 9B122[206]325-2553
fence mueller aia,cal•senior associates:robert olscheweky,eileen furney
associates:robert Fadden,michael gaibraith,richard hamlet',robert wells
a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by and under the supervision of registered architects
P5. 001
NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE
BUILDING AND ZONING , DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY
DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS:
DESCRIPTION: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A 148,000 SQ. FT. WAREHOUSE WITH A 24,500 SQ. FT. OFFICE MEZZANINE AND SUB-
STANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITHIN 200 FT.
OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK.
ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS
FILES: SA-071-87, SM-012-87
GENERAL LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 27TH STREET AT THE
800 BLOCK AND DIRECTLY WEST OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK.
•
PUBLIC APPROVALS: 1. SITE APPROVAL
2. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT
3. BUILDING PERMIT
The application can be reviewed at the Bulding and Zoning
Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments
will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during
public hearings. For further information on the application
or dates of final action by the City, please contact the
Building and Zoning Department at 235-2540.
Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the
Renton Building and Zoning Department.
Ronald G. Nelson
Building & Zoning Director
CERTIFICATION
F. Li 1.31) HEREBY CERTIFY THAT "�h-►IiE
COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME ON
J' E.P're.wm5 R 3 , 19 81 ,IN '04Kee CONSPICUOUS
PLACES ON OR NEAR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED
BY LAW.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington
residing in _ 1E/li% , on the y t h
day of .('Z-PrE' %3 6-i2
,/
•
a� s CITY OF RENTOTAT
mum
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director
August 11, 1987
William S. Tsao
2201 6th Avenue
Suite 1008
Seattle, WA 98121
Subject: Michael R. Mastro Lot Line Adjustment, S.W. 27th Street
Dear Mr. Tsao:
The Renton Building and Zoning Department is in receipt of the above
referenced application for a lot line adjustment between two lots. We
understand that this is desired to allow the firm of Alaska Distributors
to locate a new building along the eastern side of the property.
As the adjustment you desire involves shifting the common line between
Lots 1 and 2 a full 90°, this cannot be construed as a minor adjustment
under the City's lot line adjustment procedure. This is a major
reconfiguration of the lots.
The method for a major readjustment of property lines is to have the
property replatted through a short plat process. This method does
require more time and is costlier, but can be done concurrently with the
pending site plan approval application we have with Alaska Distributors.
We are therefore returning to you, your lot line adjustment application
and check in the amount of $100. 00. If you wish to pursue this matter
through the short plat procedure, please let us know so that we may
assist you with the proper forms and steps in accomplishing the replat.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to
contact either myself or Jerry Lind of this office.
S .
•
Do . rickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
DKE:JFL:csb:dskl
LtTsao
Enclosure .
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540
•
tro . ti 0 CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director
August 11, 1987
William S. Tsao
2201 6th Avenue
Suite 1008
Seattle, WA 98121
Subject: Michael R. Mastro Lot Line Adjustment, S.W. 27th Street
Dear Mr. Tsao:
The Renton Building and Zoning Department is in receipt of the above
referenced application for a lot line adjustment between two lots. We
understand that this is desired to allow the firm of Alaska Distributors
to locate a new building along the eastern side of the property.
As the adjustment you desire involves shifting the common line between -
Lots 1 and 2 a full 90°, this cannot be construed as a minor adjustment
under the City's lot line adjustment procedure. This is a major
reconfiguration of the lots.
The method for a major readjustment of property lines is to have the
property replatted through a short plat process. This method does
require more time and is costlier, but can be done concurrently with the
pending site plan approval application we have with Alaska Distributors.
We are therefore returning to you, your lot line adjustment application
and check in the amount of $100. 00. If you wish to pursue this matter
through the short plat procedure, please let us know so that we may
assist you with the proper forms and steps in accomplishing the replat.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to
contact either myself or Jerry Lind of this office.
Do rickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
DKE:JFL:csb:dskl
LtTsao
Enclosure .
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540
......__ _
3,
. zl 1 \\ 11,c..i .
r// : ,__ _
I4 . , ,.
:; _.
I ,q
J4o
1"1 NO. 4.t • ' 3..U.). 19TH 517 •I
SY ( -�ti.) 32 , 1 a
i ' 1 1 \ G..id ii,
J . I P17 I• Q ._ ,t_Q S 16
0 ® C w 7151
1 5 T T
w `\ Emma= - '— ,1
Eimw 2 - 1 1-_=u2. —--7.1 ... 1'
:],.-:,..-:;-.;;IliH:7,
I,J9" . 11
1 Z sobJEC'f 3'. !ki . 4, . — .
I 0,,1 F W . r. J ••
, I y
G ® I .b I I I 1
I I I I
I
I i � IZ it 10 I
•
2 I I
L
I _9lf ST
s Q- 411k I
I I I I 7 8 9 z
--I I I
I I
ter. I - - ✓11_ -- _
40
ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS (LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES)
SITE PLAN APPROVAL: - SA-071-87
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM-012-87
APPLICANT LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA 13.3 ACRES
PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 27th STREET.
EXISTING ZONING M-P (MANUFACTURING PARK)
EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED
PROPOSED USE WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE USE
- COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION
COMMENTS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 27th STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK AND
DIRECTLY WEST OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THE APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE A SUBSTANTIAL
SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
4
J'
a s � ��
I —,o
_______ \ LE__w_i
,..7_, NO. 4}�•
L- I 4 dY
iv
On
d; `
, , n. ,...
(4 __ , 1 .
I _ W- ---- W— 4
U > >,-.____
O4 I I ---- -- I.
•
1' —9- — - -~ - it '
x
I 1Pr' 's ,,7- - .,-'i SubJECsr 31 , .., ,
+.y A ' 0,5 1, S y r
QI , , �,
, 4- _______J . /
!, , . ....
'r 1 ,/ ! I t' a ,
,' pit .''' Lf
.0 . A '
I\
G 1) i l
© ` , I I • I
o I I IZ II 10 1
,,[, •
..., ..
A--
I.
r
I
I I
—.)--) I I , I 7 8 9 z I
1 1 I I V
11 I 1
11 I i
ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS (LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES) .
SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-071-87
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM-012-87
APPLICANT LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA 13.3 ACRES
PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 27th STREET.
EXISTING ZONING M—P (MANUFACTURING PARK)
EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED
PROPOSED USE WAREHOUSE .AND. OFFICE USE
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION
COMMENTSLOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 27th STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK AND
DIRECTLY WEST OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THE APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE A SUBSTANTIAL
SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
,
-- I
_1
E .. __., __
tl'@, Si ...., . I
� _ -1 .2' . I =;
a, Li
I
h = �.�.,�.�..
— 11 l�l ��1�
't`- I
s O� II I I I I � -, ,
F0 1 1 , , ' ;,_,
i3 1 111 SN ;il lllITI I II � bI iI II III� r I I I � I I t II IrI � sn I I I IN I III I '
�' QjAo �' •c 4 � .+' .��aP• ,V a ®CO
;- c �, . 0 . .
sP SPRINGBROOK CREEK
1 ig,41 , i g i 1 -,t4p,z la kt.. . i .1 % zzv. ' 0
ram == i1rN9U
•I
('il � � �
ii' 1 t z $ Fr Z i Ili zs Q 41 fZ4 -6 > ; \- .. E
o
? it c 111 „, V" 1 i 1/1
4 R
o F
1 1 it ' N 6' 0 c c I lit,.
F
O O ¢ -
Ss r
I
2
Ea
UI ; I!l9 ..
N
LANDSCAPE PLAN ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS
r d�^•
lance mueller c,1
& associatcp SW 27th$IHttl
arehiteete aia
,..,...... w ..'" .......... RENTON,WASI-QNGTON J..ei �. d..
•
GENERAL NOTES
___________ .••___LEL_____;. _,...,- .
—
_,j( i.j 1 I
1 I
Li
i
3.Verl 4 144.of 41 41114 442.
!,=:_._ n _________
, i;,,....,:._,......,.... : _______________ _____ 44444 4.4 oleo.441 44144 le us be 4444.4 4.•
-------;L_______________;L________ _i ; (__ 1 ,••
NN.N.,•N. a
a.n.‘wears.
c 3 1,2
c..-,..,),▪—.4.4—.),:-,.....,..;.,.c.....,....r.,....
„.tzr,',77,;. :2 z:qn,..°.:1:7.::,:'.."-"'-'---'• (
. :
--.-_____-----,--
, -7:g;z„7.7:',r:',.r•-".'7, —,-:!"'----•""'— 1111•
•
1.4444 betwee el1.1.or a.44.
0 t . . 0 el CD
-.,;--
2..re...n........aa.Ern,o...a...a.......
ET)
I .
I .•.; .,.;.::::::,;:;."4::..rr::,.„—4414 prIse 4 444 of
Oa.474.1=.14.4 Le 1.441.4.4 444 44a 44r 4
1._____• GI
Z—
.—...,--
gd IZ-
.= 41
33.4w1rea 414nto per Clty C411.4 1.3 4 444441 414 4
a =
i .
I -4, - ...ne.tanam.......n...us n.. n.....I....
a.n......n ri........
I —
— 7
_..
— 0
)i)
N
VICINITY MAP
rl _
.,, , • ,rn
i- -• 3_' X*. .11.N.li 1 ''..-1 7.
-- i • Z -• t, •:,--• - • Id
11
•
Cr
. i
. -Nile;`.‹. --.- -- 1.• .' ;I I.i t,,.IT: V I-
'.! "•-•‘: ; r N
C/1
.,--,_ .e.,--,_-_---..._14,.. . ,ki- •• _. ,. . 7
I.';-..14 .' ,r* ' 'r..i "10 ''. it ' •
-=':t, Alf r'',..,` ;IVA' "'"I ,"I-- ,••i ,..
-1711VITrir"—Wii16.17.-4 1 4 - ;I, • -•'a .,'C'''.'.qatt 'l aCia_k I - -416',6 ' 4i
.517-E • tLX)& 1/2. .../ 1.1447.4 0. I I- . _
, — i..
1- •
...., _.
-,,-
,........•—......:ins.x..-- I
c.....,-.... SC.%
7:4':::::..• i
I ----1 —
— '. ..- '''' '-';..47,5r1 ' l'--r.,'4 f •1- .4..,t-1 q I —I
il-- --„T'irti. '1. 4..'''''': .-i : . :. /. . •ii, A ,.i . ....-^—e-.;)S., • : J"!- ,I.: ..-
.....,,
---.4
'It en
ILI 112-E ' 'j-r
______ ,' 2 II .---- LI'- . :.I -* L. 771 i
V, - . :.I-4,-' : 1:
_ .
) .
•1— — .
...1_ .
_
LEGAL DESCRIPTION o
./I
I—
— .1 444 of tee 4444.44 4.ear0441.444.1......
t g
,i'-dj-.1..:t-, Q......................,,....
I 1 B '''•
-.,.)i • • ,.• „ , rx.:7.1.117.2:„.::,,i1:::,.,-.,:r..-.111,1::=4...1.,•=4,
n 4/4•414 uo obe go of Nold 114.4 I.CZ ;
•
, .., 11111 Ili ITIL .
:
. .. ..:,. ,. Ititi) .4
17.;r:l7:11.1::761."•:::.:Xlat It:74:11.-.7:Z.::.:.'"
Troce 4.1,44114•ItO llso ogelb I.at eeld lorgise 10 feet to 4
e.co CO O
.14._..______,,•,e_Lcy.).'• • e er,,c ,,,,,._ i_4_, ...j...
i• •:,—,11-e_^-- —---::::::::=ILV.."1:::::::',11::::'.:7::.::.:;- 3'- :
E a ;
'‘..." .1.. i I'Sillijill2-1' LI 1 1 ialL 1 i ii 1,7ril
_ .
.,_ .
.____... i....., .......n..........n -1 C
4 AV IV IOW 4
.i.11/410 oe•4:4":4"------ ./...4 .•••4......,44.1.0..1.I.4 oold 14114.4 tbe 44 a- Cid
.--
--"' ".ri:!.----....--- 41''''....----.------ 4 4.114.
.. ./1,<.....,. .. . .
..........,.... p.m......,.... .......n
—....._,L...--.4_2r4,''if 4t•IN r:c....e....,......,,_
SW 27th
4ter.4114 1414 40.0211. t1i ;
'• , STREET_.._..r. .••..... .r......,.,.......... ,••••••;
— '" ul
r.
—•
..---.._L?trrr_1_,..•-...-... ,e",•Pols 44,
— ,
`....
I_ •
•
:l .
•
SI
I 1;i -
1 I
-J —� \/
N
I /
1 I, / -7 f __ I _ T'
. I i i 1 .--.) iLFII o o j,/
L P I }1 '' /� / I ! I
I r
x l
1 o i 1"
7--ri i • I \�_ __/ :v 1 1
}1 1`1 $ ma \\ o.n 1\ l
51 I c T CV �— T vo i I /
—oo 01ao 1—.1 5.---
a ^. 3-m �� \1 P�n_� r I --
1 \ ) / 7 ¢
I II t a
1 mI II o2- '� o
im, 1 Lp _ / , I
T 1 1 a8 r -i I / r /
t 7 , ) T- -T ; I . 1 VF,;___- J 1 1
I 1 ; !. _jia,.I '''' 7,:: . \
el
¢ _ .m ¢. .� I InI
1 It _y----- _ - le' IY l ••—� �� e ne i
�Ii=\ tit f s R G - R o - k_ � —
r _ h,I111
II 4s i8
o
p.
I 0•
IS :is
r� ,
a
.
n_ it �-1sI, `
t ' �' I. .•.I,I SCHE IC GR.o I. 0 4 .+ Imo,-,- P H,I , V .-.,
g a s >a t n o I sH I our=e s %/�d BUSH,ROED&HITCHINGS,INC. fISP°`�°
'� CIVIL[NmuEcnS L LAND sunvLVORS SEAL —
' Y.
Re.,:e'n1,.Ha9,TSH RB H .22 dI
OF RFti
U c% © Z
1 211 '2
09 111::::::1/1 ,,
III ICE
0,91TEO sole"
OF PENDING
I •
: SITE , A.
I ,
ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS FILE #: SA-071-87 & SM-012-87
DESCRIP ,. ION :
APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO
ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 148,000 SQ. FT. WAREHOUSE WITH A 24,500 SQ, F.
OFFICE MEZZANINE & SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID
DEVELOPMENT MEZZANINE & SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW
SAID DEVELOPEMNT WITHIN 200 FEET OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK. .
GENERAL LOCATION ANII:/OR _ADDRESS:
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 27TH STREET AT THE 800 BLOCK AND DIRECTLY WEST
OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK.
PUBLIC APPt• VALS REQ .' IRED :
1. SITE APPROVAL
2, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT
3, BUILDING PERMIT
PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED
BY THE BUILDING & ZONING II. EPARTMENT
ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS
. ., ND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
•�� 7 o `''ITY OF RENTO"T FILE NO(S): A=o7 -&1
C) E; t L...LDING & ZONING DEPARTI..LNT 8 e'-'1 `')'872' 4
„k ` - oho a
41) N MASTER APPLICATION
NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those
items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed.
(Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
APPLICANT I 1 TYPE OF APPLICATION
NAME FEES
d.nee /4�e%r A.. ,,. . Q REZONE*(FROM TO )
ADDRESS -
/3 0 1�// . fie #- .s-e) CJ SPECIAL PERMIT*
CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT*
5 Qe 6 9 p/ 2- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* -
TELEPHONE D SITE PLAN APPROVAL Zt4A,0 "?'
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 426 °.
(Ve)G) 3 5 - c2-5�3 No. of Cubic Yards:4'/4 C)
CONTACT PERSON Q . VARIANCE*
From Section: •
NAME * Justification Required
ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 1
/
5 0 Z.4 /d/ 7. 257 D SHORT PLAT
CITY ZIP ' Q TENTATIVE PLAT
S _CC-./V// 91/7-2- ® PRELIMINARY PLAT
TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT
3 ,? .5-- a.ems 3 . 1::::1 WAIVER
(Justification Required)
OWNER NO. OF LOTS:
NAME //� /� PLAT NAME:
/o6e, -!//5 7?g to
ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT:
/•oe/ S,+', 1 Ae So' Q PRELIMINARY
CITY ZIP E] FINAL
-ea,',k ?fre P.U.D. NAME:
TELEPHONE
/�„ -,2 - 7 3// ID Residential Q Industrial
C!� O l Commercial Q Mixed
LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: ,
PROPERTY ADDRESS
Q TENTATIVE
) 4-55 J/cam/a6-73
`/
EXISTING USE ( PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY
FINAL
PROPOSED USE PARK NAME:
Q FIZ- V LSTi,l O 077D4J NUMBER OF SPACES:
f
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 1 2'}-�-
SQ. FT.- ACRES }-��FEES - 0 l
AREA: S .1 l 5 / IOTA`` Figs
J0
_. _ C TY PT= t N�'t~N,STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING
STAMP u
DATE TAMP I L'i �? u 1.4� f APPLICATION RECEIVED BY:
argn i APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE:
\j've�L. ae' 98 Q Accepted
Incomplete Notification Sent Oh: By:
: L.:_)-,1G/ZONING DEPT, (Initials)
DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: ,, Li ,®!Zjq't?f
APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 5 ti."COL/ 05P-nn,j
i E1 Accepted
QIncomplete Notification Sent On By:
(Initials)
ROUTED TO:
Mikkiilding Ei Design Eng. E Fire E1 Parks
II Police =3, Policy Dev. l=J Traffic Eng. v Utilities
• REVISED 1-31-84
.
' I
Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet).
II
AFFIDAVIT
' I, isaA `f2/r,C , being duly sworn, declare that I am
[]uthorized representative to act for the property .owner; owner of the property involved
in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the
information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS
o 9 — DAY OF
19
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE S ATE OF
WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT
`•\
(Na of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) rc-c/e --gr,.otr-
/3 Q,kl ch
(Address) 'I (Address)
III
(City) (State) : (Zip)
1. 00 3
(Telephone)
Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete
application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in
the "Application Procedure."
Form #174
� r
•
That portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of
Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. in King County, State
of Washington, described as follows:
Commencing at the northeast corner of said Section;
Thence south along the east line of said Section a distance of 180.01 feet
to an intersection with a line parallel to -and 180 feet southerly, measured
at right angles to the north line of said Section;
Thence westerly, parallel with the north line of said Section 20 feet to an
intersection with a line parallel to and 20 feet westerly, measured at right
angles to the east line of said Section, and the true point of beginning;
Thence southerly 1074.37 feet along said line parallel to and 20 feet
westerly measured at right angles to the east line of said Section;
Thence north 88°24'48" west 560 feet;
Thence northerly, parallel to the east line of said Section, 1095.48 feet
more or less to the intersection with a line which runs north 87°12'59" west
from the true point of beginning;
Thence easterly, parallel with the north line of said Section, to the true
point of beginning.
EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Renton for road purposes by deed
recgrded under Recording Number 8401240272.
CITY OF RENTON
JUL 2 91987
BUILDING/ZONING DEFT.
lance mueller
& associates
architects
July 23, 1987
CITY OF RENTON
Building & Zoning Dept.
200 Mill Avenue So.
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS
Dear Sir:
Alaska Distributors is an office warehouse/distribution facility
designed for the distribution of merchandise to Alaska via
truck.
The project consists of 148,000 s.f. warehouse with 24,500 s.f.
office mezzanine. Future development will include another
140,000 s.f. of warehouse and 24,000 s.f. of office mezzanine.
The building is constructed of tilt-up concrete panels, dryvit
over-hang above truck loading doors and insulated tinted
exterior glazing. All concrete and dryvit to be painted in warm
earth tones.
The site plan will feature significant landscaping and parking
for 285 cars.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sin ere' y
LANCE _,& ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS
Patrick Kerr
PK:nk
130 lakeside• suite 250 • seattle,washington 913122(205]326-2553
lance mueller aie,cal•senior associates:robert olscheweky,eileen furney
associates:robert fedden,michael gaibraith,richerd hernish,robert wells
a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by and under the supervieionof registered architects
LANCE MUELLER LEM OF U'E[ SIE DUMIL
ASSOCIATES/ARCHITEC... z.
130 Lakeside Suite 250
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 DATE JOB NO.
5 .
(206) 325-2553 A 7
RE:
TO 0 k 1L S Teiira/MieZ
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans 0 Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
CITY OF RENTON
ENGINEERING DEPT.
cly=?f-RENTON
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
rr-
Z
COPY TO �—
SIGNED:
PROINCT240-2 (NJ Inc,Gmtnn,M�01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN
* * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * *
PROJECT TITLE: ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS
APPLICANT: LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES
APPLICATION NUMBER: SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-071-87
The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the
pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City
Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to
site plan approval.
ASSESSOR'S
NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER
Adjoining to West
Longprop Development 510 Rainier Ave. So. 252304-9064-04
Seattle, WA 98144 252304-9058-02
Adjoining to North
Burlington Northern R.R. 2100 First Interstate Center 252304-9019-00
999 Third Ave. 252304-9001-00
Seattle, WA 98104
•
Adjoining to South (across street)
City of Renton Renton City Clerk 252304-9076-00 .
Renton, WA 98055
Adjoining to East
Mobile Oil Co. c/o Olympic Pipeline 302305-9084-02
612 So. Flower St.'
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Mobile Oil Co. Property Tax Division 302305-9086-00
P. 0. Box 290
Dallas, Texas 75221
•
CITY OF REN O,''
JUL 291987
BU1LDING/ZONING DEPT.
1
' ASSESSOR'S i
NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER
I
CERTIFICATION
I, 3nn2ict T,&k , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their
addresses were taken from the records of the Kin Count Assessor as prescribed by law.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to be re me, a
Notary Public, in and or the State of Washington ;
residing at -e_ on
the c 5 day of
Z---) .
cam,- ___--- S
CERTIFICATION OF MAILING
I, "-3-EK ( F.l.tion , hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site
plan approval were mailed on AAS�, 21, l i87, to each listed adjacent property owner as
prescribed by law.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington
residing at F;tiT©n.) , on
the 2 7 t , day of c i ()s 1 3-?
C o_<j C o0C_p SIGNED: Lvn i
FORM 2QB
OF R4,4,j, ECF: ( —nt0-87
4. S - D7l-Bi
t LU: ly
0 z City of Renton - o s
P �S 61
0, P ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
9g7
4
1)
SEP.T°'It
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all
governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making
decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals
with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose
of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts
from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)
and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your
proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the
environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS.
Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best
description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your
knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own
observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know
the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does
not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and
landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the
governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do
them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional
information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The
agency to which you submit this check.;dist may ask you to explain your answers or provide
additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impacts.
Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly)
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be
answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR
NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs),
the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site"
should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Alaska Distributors
2. Name of applicant:
Lance Mueller & Associates/Architects
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact.person:
Pat Kerr
130 Lakeside, Suite 250
Seattle, WA 98122
(206) 325-2553
4. Date checklist prepared:
July 23, 1987
5. Agency requesting checklist:
Building & Zoning Department
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
October 1 , 1987 begin building construction
February 1 , 1988 occupancy CITY OF RENTC J
- 1MD
'JUL 2 fgay
•
BUILDING/ZONING DPT,
7. Do you have any poor future additions, expansions, arther activity related _
, to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain.
Yes, site plan shows future expansion.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
N.A.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
N.A.
10. List any governmental approvals or permits, that will be needed for your proposal,
if known.
N.A.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and
the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist
that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to
repeat those answers on this page.
Natural earth tone color painted tilt-up/dryvit office/warehouse distribution
facility. Office space has solar bronze! insulated glass. Structural fill under
slab with perimeter landscaping and gener41 site improvements.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and
section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,
site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you
should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate
maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
See attached.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one); a) rolling, hilly, steep
slopes,' mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site;(approximate percent slope)?
2%o
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
Sandy clays, silty clay and sandy gravel
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
No.
- 2 -
•
a. Describe the pose, type, and approximate qu ies of any filling or
�` grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
l l0 do cS 7 S66 G'/l//G „Da 7e ,e7. b(It V 71 Y�oc-`(J
4i►t�, al o ` ), compacted select fill (bldg. pad) and 12" of compact fill below
paling area. /)nt,,,s-)i of / = /7/yoo'-y pffil`St - a�000
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing. construction, dr use? If so.
generally describe.
Temporary erosion control measures will be utilized to contain erosion
completely on site.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces
after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
/o..30 67 72% OF Pfislse 0,06
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the
earth. if any:
Containment ditches, sedimentation pond(s) , and hay bail dams or
other means as required to contain on site.
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,
dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and
when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give
approximate quantities if known.
Normal equipment exhaust emissions during construction, as well as
dust (rains should help mitigate) . Post construction vehicle exhaust
emissions from normal car and truck traffic.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emission?
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,
if any:
None.
3. WATER
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state
what stream or river it flows into.
Spring brook creek/ditch.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)
the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Yes, site improvements and building construction.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site
that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
Does not apply.
CITY OF F2NTO'I
re \II WI
OCT 2219F
- 3 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
.. _ zer:, Any
4)' '5
Will.the 'prof 'ii, require surface.water withdrav-`=1 or diversions? Give . _
! general desci _ on, purpose, and approximately qu ties if known.
No..
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? '.If.so, note location on
the site plan. .
No.
6) .Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
discharge.
No.
b. , Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground
water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if
known.,
No. '
2) ' Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing ,the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.).
Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the
number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or
humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
None.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of
I.. collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? .Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
Storm water. will'.be collected by city approved on site detention
system.
2) Could waste materials ,enter ground or surface waters? .If so, generally
describe.
No.
- 4 -
d. Proposed r ts to reduce or control surfaced, and runoff water
impacts, if any:
See 3.c. 1 ) above
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
'a Shrubs
rX grass
o crop or grain
o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other
o other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Shrubs and grasses over 95% of the site.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
Do not know of any.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve
or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
Proposed landscape includes maples, pines, rhododendrons, azaleas,
laurels, ivy, lawn and miscellaneous other local plant material
indigenous to the area. A natural area to the east side of the site will
5. Animals remain undistrubed.
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site
or are known to be on or near the site:
Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other
Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Cc ty mamma I s
Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other riUrre
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
Do not know.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Do not know.
- 5 -
d. Proposed rilOas to preserve or enhance wildliny: , _I
Preservation of existing grasses plus addition of new plant
material (see B.4.d. above)
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be
used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it
will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Electric or natural gas for heating, lighting manufacturing
ventilation, etc.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe.
No.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included Ihnett • plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any:
Comply with Washington State Energy Code.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health 'hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
No.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
None.
C
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if
any:
No.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for
example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
Do not know.
111 2) What types#ovals of noise would be createdr associated with the
project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,
•
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come
from the site.
Construction will generate typical construction noise. Operation
of the plant will generate insignificant noise. Vehicle noise will
include 30 passenger cars + /day at 8a.m. and 5 p.m. , 8 truck trips
per day +.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
•
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Vacant, undeveloped.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
None.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
M-P.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Manufacturing park.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of
the site?
Not Applicable.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"
area? If so, specify.
No.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
70 - 80 including truck drivers.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
75% + of the work force will come from the local area.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
None.
- 7 -
i
1. Proposed rams to ensure the proposal is coiible with existing and -
projected land uses and plans, if any:
Do not know
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided. if any? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
None.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
None.
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including
antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed.
28' - 0" above floor line; 32' - 0" above grade at dock high doors;
plus additional. 3' ± to roof ridge plus roof top equipment. Exterior:
painted smooth concrete & dryyit solar tint glass.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or cont Il01 aesthetic impacts, if any:
Architectural and landscape design.
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day
would it mainly occur?
Office lighting will be visible at night through the window system.
Site lighting will be provided by security wall pack lights on the
side of the building during hours of darkness.
b. Could light or glare from the. finished project be a safety hazard or
interfere with views?
No safety hazard.
No views at night.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
Existing street lights on both Lind Avenue and S.W. 27th Avenue.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Wall pack lights will be non-glare type.
- 8 -
,
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
Interurban trail .
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
No.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Shower facility can accommodate individual workouts.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state,
or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
None.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: •
-Does not apply
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Entrance drives at south property lines will access S.W. 27th Street
and Lind Avenue.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately
distance to the nearest transit stop?
No: 500 yards + to nearest stop.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate?
Project provides 285 stalls; eliminates none.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
No.
- 9 -
e. Will the pr use (or occur in the immediate ty of) water, rail, or
air transportation? If so, generally describe.
No.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
50 - 60 cars coming in morning and leaving at night plus 5 trucks
during the day and 20 trucks during t the nitgtt.
g. Propose measures to reduce or contro ranspor a ion impacts, if any:
None.
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for
example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)?
If so, generally describe.
Police and fire protection - yes; emergency only.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,
if any.
None.
16. Utilities
a. Circle u • •= curren y a ailable at the site: lectricity ural gais
a er,, efuse services telephonet=- septic system, other.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility
• providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or
in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Electricity - Puget Sound Power and Light
Gas - Washington Natural Gas
water, refuse (PNB) , sanitary
C. SIGNATURE
I, th-. .ersigned, sta - ..at to the best of my knowledge the above information is
tr - and complete. It is •■erstood that :the lead agency may withdraw any
de, laration of non-sig • icanc= I. at it might issue in reliance upon this checklist
sho ,d there be a �i I ul mis, • ` en ation or willful lack of full disclosure on
my pa • ,� �I
-�4��' 1
Proponent: A- -�•�
Name Printed: Pat Kerr
- 10 -
#176 11-8-84
•
2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:
DATE CIRCULATED: November 5, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: November 19,1987
EFC - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
PROJECT TITLE: Alaska Distributors. Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval of 1 ) a Site Plan for
li Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a T48,000 sq_ ft warehnnae
. with, a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzanine:' 2) a ppecial permit for fill and grade to
L n' allrvelop7,400pglb c.yards of material on the site; ' and 3)Shorelines Substantial
Located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directl west of
Srigpok Creek. 13.3 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 172,500 sq_ ft.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
• MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
, 1) Earth
1 2) Air
3) Water
4) Plants
5) Animals
6) Energy and Natural Resources
7) Environmental Health
8) Land and Shoreline Use
9) Housing
10) Aesthetics
1 11) Light and Glare
12) Recreation
13) Historic and Cultural Preservation
14) _Transportation
15) Public Services
1 16) Utilities
COMMENTS:
I
1
, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we
; have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where
additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
,Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
Form 4
RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPA 'MENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
IECF - 060 - 87
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-071-87, SM-012-87
PROPONENT: Alaska Distributors (Lance Mueller & Associates)
•PROJECT TITLE : Alaska Distributors, Office/Distribution Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applications for approval Of 1)a Site Plan for Phase I
Of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft- warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft
office mezzanine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approx. 47,400 cubic yards
of material on the site; and 3) Shorelines Substantial Development permit.
LOCATION :
Located on the north side of SW': 27th Street at the 800 block and iirectly west of •
Springbrook Creek.
TO:
, El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12/2/87
OENGINEERING DIVISION
OTRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
OUTILITIES ENG, DIVISION
10 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
tiPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1:1BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
fl POLICE DEPARTMENT
fl POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING. PLEASE' PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P.M. ON • Npvember 19.1987
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
. ® APPROVED [1] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
1
_
1
DATE:
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182