Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA87-079
I ' I J 0lri5 was LLI BUILDING r BUILDING I / ��. iti-i'iMal UdYEI A l B Ion: Ui'i$alQ-Ali.r.i Yj Ti 11 ' --• C -) C . ,�ee.nN '� N 00.30.37' �`'- � ad 7- a arm N Lo mLod-aie.o•ov}xac ei mL., -p4��;1,.� M Smce.¢e1-�' IFl!6�^Jt}alp' ie�a rJ./ I ~AA X tJo' l4�'U' / --- D t N t \ �\ I. _ �_ _—J—_ 1 i / / I j �� i — _ T /i1 4 //' —vs __—i——$--� y l i�'.d 'b'_' I d yd \ ,W' y=z F / -f e ( li —- ^ 13 \ „ 1 mom lig LIND 50UARE W 3 a ,III I .7�{mJ//3X6(i \ 1 2 to 0 .. _ l-- / #> W � ♦ Jz��d�uil. I 0j 3'. -:04,=--- N �jw ' I,v ' 'n- -A'o' :�Jl;a re� se91 n!o'I��I+,Le,et'-2'.d ,z1eLJdd�^ -da' `�F�I ''7:- !,.CP z _ i— W I a I \ I P l l — II " VICINITY MAP • ( �� ,��� • — a K� s )ter' o o — c NO SCALE \\ 1 j t I o BUILDINGC ee /ate SS �—t •I I u / 1 ... North IS WAS + c,,,,,,, / azIL . • ' . . 0 ...., ),4-.— 1W,,,, ,‘,..... ld ell v)-o' dd r.0�xr.s 4 M,d td - - ma o a..d w.-c' Ld{erRm 0 d 1-emic o 7 - \' I 1 i- f1 � n`` ``I`I`I`I`I`I`Iael`I`I`I` `I`1/I/ Id I1I J SOUTH e .,9 . LIND SQUARE \ 2. �\y �/ __ qs_ / MOW oa E ' ��k/ \ \ sw.a.a sr 2 e _... .. ..,. 0 SITE LAYOUT PLAN °° ii- SCALE:1':90• t,' North - EWE SEPT.1,1987 SITE STATISTICS: " LOCATION MAP ° "" NO SCALE PRE TOTAL SITE AREA: 190,425 SO.FT. PARKING PROVIDED: No,O, PE''''" LT BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 64,250 SO.FT. STANDARD 153 SITE COVERAGE: 28.5% COMPACT 89 ,v.Y0n6 LANDSCAPED AREA:_41,107 SO.FT. N.C. 4 PARKING MANEUVERING:-06,060 SO.FT. TOTAL 228 . BUILDING AREA: BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B-2 OFFICE 40,680 SO.FT. CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-N WAREHOUSE 0,137 S0.FT. SPRINKLERED: YES STORAGE 8,425 SO.FT. ZONING: MP SD-1 TOTAL 54,260 S0.FT. FIRE/ZONE: ^-�^„�W,o,+gip•; TS TS PARKING REQUIRED: �'�•'�'�'°'""'•' OFFICE 203 eier' BF WAREHOUSE 0 DO DO STORAGE 4 SD. GO TOTAL 215 r C, ABA 387511 pail poi: F'� w r C . Ll . ---- Nafi� BUILDING -.BUILDING Zp:>_ e I • Y�(3>�a -- ri. Li MANY A.. . . , . . , , . : _ FD i _:j.m.s+.-er-' d lTU.lo"osri-.r.�a.�rP.o' ••:e'd nr...w.,e' .1.1....z., e_,., ...., •bra..ar•r .....w tao.d :ea r+. _ ''b • 7, ,a ,.d =l.l=�=�L-=Li=1= o - . o ` =I=�=Jol=1°i°1�°i.°I��� •, �s ici O 'A . Aca-.,a,,. ....-.. , I I I ``1. ' I. ,•r. ,v.,....a..r. _ "'� �. TV.Y i m 4 �- - 6 i.'o' o'- $ d d - / i. S • y � � 1 1 a Ix J= .Q O11t • • Yr _ o m. c(I 9e 1.1 I S,l'te+ Fd~ W •I�Z pi Ig� ii � I � � Ip n.,l ; R'R- -e.d -- m.,z _ e' Tr'- ' An el'a'd - '• I -dd <.4dd 3 �' _ •- - .0 e W Iffillii i '� �Y .. ILIIIIIIrawininim �'r e L.' -- _ -- • /, VICINITY --• - .- NITY MAP NO'CAL. • — - _ • BUILDING - '�"—b t- .. i ' S a J �,--!T.. -. •v� -- u 1 a z ... -2 _,— .-_o opr....tiarawmo•-.: go • 1 .. . ., _ ,_,_ d �, ,....4. ,. ,i-1 ie,.sl._ . .. Q per, a+lhan..la� - •. n r._ '„'.d ' vim_�.>,x '.G.;. � : ,.D.-�„_.,rid._�t _� V \ Z�'oo I .I I _vl ,e'a�a la,o1e!e,ciele c,c;ci^e o"e c cicla i I Imo' I o "3 SOUTH LND SOUARt 'CI • b o A .'I'o n (j'—IL�YT-a�A6_� n'` ol.ih.l J '1' Ark'... Z 'e` Boar 1��' N l►ar n•l J • -- • �� Q Y J PL AN7 SILE / / j' " 10 .e - 0 PI,NI AIiUS. A0 ER FoI\A •Lo.l O=a PlA.1E ],u;4` 7f ` __• -- LANDSCAPE PLAN ® ,,,,,a, ,s , F"Ic asN ; , Q ICALl:1•:iD' 7tu4us SentuLAT.. ''kvJA.12n,CNERRY ed f_�b/.I Pre\.S C....eay.�. "cl,.fe, Acne" • _. North ® A ER PAeMAeuK SNOKAES MAO,.` (.-'1• ' 0 P,cEA P...l(...cas G\.Avca9DRucc b-S- SEPT.1.IRST' SITE STATISTICS: 0 LIOu,DAMgER. ''I_YVAr $. Is,-,;,_ " LOCATION MAP �,,, * ,'t=.I,asds A01,R.(:M eyP2ES, C-9� NO KAu . TOTAL SITE AREA: 190.425 SO.FT. PARKING PROVIDED: North• ® 'a..U.,aA �MFST,LA '11EAJ E.1 y FNAMTOc '• "'" LT BUILDING FOOTPRINT:_54.a0 um S0.FT. STANDARD a `'"'�- ® lleusr vuK-'fAAe\,euM u(A.LOAP Pa.J.r" 'I-Zu' SITE COVERAGE:_ 28.014 COMPACT - 0S Lr:aOsc.enlu LANDSCAPED AREA: 41,107 SO.FT. N.C. 4 O 1?mo.,s TAP0$AI A .P\,R•� IS 5 911101 E.(ER GREET A2AeEA Je..,..1 9.r.axl `-`�'I- • PARKING MANEUVERING:_{O.OSS SO.FT. TOTAL 221 00 =\\ . 41.. BUILDING AREA: BUILDING OCCUPANCY: Fa RVo00Da=.1 OROtl SF- 1 ]I->4- _ ,.a•vvfo=.c..A OFFICE 40.SSS S0.PT. CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-N O Pt,..luc LAutoe.ee,Suc OHO Lu,1Lc,1 One LoI,gte'�\ L..uREL ac... O CwAv.I.E CI PARS 'J,s,=€5A Lc....4.1' b..1..c W.DTt0AS0t1,.1=N ?c.,_ ....,...tr., _ - WAREHOUSE S,la1 S0.FT. SMIMKLlRED: YES • - STORAGE 13.421 SO.FT. ZONING: _ b• Geoudoev1eet kldd\c1EI 14)Ue (]�*.C.' V`b.a ' TOTAL 54,E00 SO.FT. FIRE-ZONE:. C) D...tr..- RN=OO/strnSe4r.0 Coot r,J„o= • __ r. PARKJNO REQUIRED: C' Sor La.e/d I %!!�4' I: • "-.-: . OFFICE 203 y I„ �, mv. ' 1-lillc it - MARlMOUS! S - =ill=1111r lllll—011l - STORAOS , e I . - 1 TOTAL 211 - mn or • • ,d-d a g ri • o u CO 1 — 1IIIi ■ III 1 i ■ °: i ■ Ii—.• II mil ,: . I . I■III 111,411 UPIII III 1 . I III I I U 1iII I II 111 [ II 111 ._ . . I ' �.d . . I • N . I U •• �lll . m I!J1 . I . I 11111 • .III hI'. 11111 jil 0 ell • � I ,:il liii [.II I l■IIIII1 I ■ III,III b [_II ,IlIIIIIiI . IiIII ■l i • iii ii 1 , . . . . . . . . . . 2 2 lr' 1 R 1 % SOUTH LIND SQUARE MACKENZIE / SAITO —— jfiy' ' g 9 ELEVATIONS PHASE II &ASSOCIATES P.S. N P m NENTON,W1ISNINOTON 100POF-'�' I'•I BUILDING SECTION FOR iti; I m +I SPIEKER PARTNERS 1206101.1005 i- - A. t sA , oil I :: 0 CITY OF RENTON t 4�`- L -�mis� "� BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT- [� 1 , � jj `lCE L7 5 OCT mi.—.in�iimin1.. 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washingto 980554. 1 :� /981 F A� -s ..-7) Th Boeing Company ,- n"` pop. Dept. .Mail Stop (1/_!) /\\:-):2) - 13-21 cD flAfgiall1/4Se . P.O. Box 37 G\2 Seattle, ashington 4 _ lifh.l :hwilid.i.ininiiii„mi,:dwii.i:4 • - li.... -c .:r..i.,;L:.✓ .si::...;...,:44,...uv,w.%?s.-.:.:-.:_m.i.,d�- -14-......-.._-.--.:...�y.�_:Y:.: ._..._.44_.: ...;.....e..._...:.._�_u_... =,--,.'. .'i.`?..TrnY✓�- 2.:33>_..,-'n- --,,,c:_1A:_..Y`3�3�" G:'wesli.. s,L, I. r 1 O1ri :jk BUILDING 1 _ BUILDING I , QQ= 3a I ezo §v719ia$ 9 C C r6i- :rfd m''d k1•.'.W nyecC+a nr-to, irl'-o' .St.ol3r:.F0 1.1Lac.,aR7aLa. !-,k' n4�uea+an'-r.F w=d�^'}afa'•:eTo ' ''b d / +y i-----ar--/ i ! jel Bpi. , da'„75, V.. O y (// —,-4A„ ,r..d.d I io o ..dd Q \ 1~";\✓-'/ Z, �� I�i sourx (03-m a t 3' / . 3 I I /,1 A,w uxD sovARE gN;c / u ( a Ij ( I it Q \ ` i so._ l t I I Q. ,d ��,� � _ x\ I y .-s v'-d d`ai�sz�-•an e'I' a'-o^`��f+�*,n'a'.o' ,:„.,_,'cf.' -do iz'o�'dy" %( / ._ ,. V \ F L 'a I'L \, ` r 1 I o // VICINITY MAP - ' • -4 ) -9 6 --11 l!I( :4:..! NO SCALE \v i ' � .g,1 0 BUILDING ... /, —u C 1 / I . 1— ' la FF. � Ia / I, I °i; 1 �` I `u' ' II �:d y s ar.d �� d d .'.a' INV �',r d,1 . real 1 � O l,h I12.1.-6 xsTv..e.1 old et v o' y •mr" M.'' i f Dn,Xn.-c�o ov raLo. f tl,val.•to ill-1. �io' �'ct . :1-7 I. I 1 ri-� T(�T 1; 1 y i 11 I csIci.l6l°la1.1.iclal°lelalal°l°l° °i°„f) 1 -� oa. SOUTH aSS''pp ^ I LIND SQUARE / -.1 1 .Oe.01' ` N _ 1.16T. W • ®/ TP.:A• /,/ �/ x 6a•ar 2r¢ 1\\ \\ \\ ' .w.ma 5T ��� //ii`��-- L , . . Ar . . 0.1 toSIITTE��LAYOUT PLAN ,..gym.�•, f SCALE:I':30' W North • SEPT.I.1087 SITE STATISTICS: t® LOCATION MAP NO SCALE ., PRE TOTAL SITE AREA: 190,428 80.FT. PANNING PROVIDED: x.,0, °' ' LT BUILDING FOOTPRINT:_84.200 SO.FT. STANDARD 183 Hap,. SITE COVERAGE:_ _ 20.1311 COMPACT 00 LANDSCAPED AREA:_61.107 SO.FT. N.C. 4 PARKING UANEUVERING:_05,000 60.FT. TOTAL 220 BUILDING AREA: BUILDING OCCUPANCY: 13-2 OFFICE 40,880 B0.FT. CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-N WAREHOUSE 0,121 00.FT. SPRINKLERED: YES STORAGE 5.428 SO.FT. ZONING: uF SD-1 TOTAL 80.280 BO.FT. FIRE,20NE: - -1'- TS TB PARKING REQUIRED: ` -- --_ OFFICE 203 v.,, BE WAREHOUSE S SD.1 DO DO STORAGE 4 .GO TOTAL 215 v I m 201e11 A • • • Oui • s , _--- a G iNa I.BUILDING -- - � � 2 �r::....._i 1. C= - JliiUlll • • ...-n'U1.22 ,r c.in'-p• ,d uc^lia.e:•:--,h'-ol G}s/.I Ws no 'is.'41 tJ . ) 1Iiei°i!21 I pf.. .-470. 4 . O -e!e a °la ciajel °,°I. j- diems .. LU :�1 . .I .� � Q 1 ! II lir.? •o • cc a I I I I I ; , , = O C • :I. I la I I I I I .i �3 a • a WI - SOUTH w omp w �� ..I F l i l l l l i 0.ill •• I �'••" r to ”' �w o • , !- r Minn , • °a_ • • 'I) • J O O '_� O oN l• -II --- - . " VICINITY MAP .01c4u . • • O-- 7 --- s • F • jp--S 6 „ - 0. • — d.d j.d} 2am'�� mod} Q ®ol I L, - OI o i 'ci°Im'c;ciel' °.mlc°°. c_cicF) . II • �. I. .O InTi&f!&Ti(uiA3l! Q • p cc PL AN-7- SILL / •1r . LANDSCAPE PLAN as C) P.Pr14.h._• At ER FUt-f4 "Lo.niC D511.- 01,C, S �' 0 Gn4T 1.t.±]._.43L•l_� FI..I�yN.. \L��. 6 j IIMPINI I1e me4au 1 © 7e.1.] Se¢Tut..*4 ' k.../4.1-L..l cue01'( `.1 .4t. S• . /141,0k1 •'t•'C •° O D.n C...c L...AL e.•..(a Pc•e' 1\.; • • North ® 4GER ?M...4.-.,., ',-4.de.., M,Otc" L-9' 0 D,cu P,.dosds Gr,uc= '3..,e 5amt.co t,-4' - cn.I.1227` SITE STATISTICS: 0 0u1D."gFi yROc.at___S nrrGNM' IVA., 8 L0CATION MAP B' 4Tea1.ai.l5 4eesRJ,nC Cyoacs._ t-'1_ mo muu TOTAL lilt ARIA: 1C0.411 CO.FT. P410110 PPOYIO10: Hod. L•,ra-u •aeIL 3. mc 5 .OWLOO POOTPIINT:_04.200 W.FT. 1TAI0AI0 102 /Ol...•r It., 3° L., . L . ,1 ' �Aox•wA.a1T8 COVBIAO0:_ 20.80 COMPACT L T • 0 Ptezt` TPPoatl 4 ,° 9111 a,LANOOCAPOD ARAM_m1,t0T SO.FT. U.C. /• 0 ,c RrS _1S" ' ;ILL: ¢.+ v(a L. PAPINIw0 MAI3UVOIIUO:_00,000 00.PT. TOTAL 221 E,IC R GREC.� tP L .. 7c•,..I L BUILOINO ARIA: OUILOioO OCCUPANCY: 1►9 RVgOO O .I(1FPN '5' _ �_ �a.,.c-v!•.•^^`a OFFICB 40.O1300.FT. COIOTIUCTIOI TYPO: V_r O '�➢v.�vt L4uw CER45:,c'0,,,,\-vYkc.l QED tu.�lcn� I.wvR« CQ.M.0 CY D4R.S ,,5-en., Lt....11Jc )-4.c.G,.or ceISBw.lw 7c.,.WAIQNOUaa LIST a0.PT. OPFIrIL[I➢O: T80 •�•"••^1 • 2TOIAoa o,•saW.PT. zowir0:___ MT ° GRov.localay. k,.ld.cK.ld.C•c f��°•c•\ N"a., • . - TOTAL NA*0 BO.FT. Pitt z0w0: -- - C ,•y44C 12N°DO lrs•re.l.. Cent cy - L PAII IO F➢OW880: - C Sea L�,.AI • - ..L%�:r', ////LF t� .._.__ .....' .._..I•....t • OFFICE 200 '1,•;1 if`' 'Il dill Ic.. ..- ..c r.,, • mutawOUaa a _,nF=-I,I,_'lu!�6Lf - OTOIA08 • 4 I - • I • TOTAL 216 1 • i • IJd m y O Z .O. El ■ e = z ■ .1 • - m m ■ y ID LI N < d. O. C OIll O 1117 7 ■ ■ • ■ ■ AN a II HI.: ,.: . ._ g a II 3 I liii II ■ III • U iI . .I I �d ■ BIM ,!d iiIIII Hill om III11 I j .III il ..I • El BM 1 Il 111111 . f. • IiI . .. : • . • • . . 1 . 6 Pll : [11 1 I . • i . I . 1 1 • 1 . , 1 . II .1 . . IIII =, a ^". ,pi / % SOUTH LIND SQUARE MACKENZIE 1 SAITO _ ELEVATIONS PHASE II &ASSOCIATES, P.S. 1 i RENTON,WASHINGTON ;'' BUILDING SECTION FOR �a _ ��i • m SPIEKER PARTNERS r4„+r x, _ _ 1 1 1 (0 5 4. I J I I 1 1 I " tT I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I t S• W. 34TH STREET t I 1 1 s , 1 1 I � 1 1 i� f i i t , i • 9y -11 /___.,____ 1 f // -- I / ul ,7 1 i� 4 / l 7 1 J., f • { z z jJ) i * !�/ SIl' .f�Ti_ Sr- ! 1 ) j I / 7 ___, G 3 1 i . ,..r-- a i ' 11 /le \t 5 4 i ' 11,+I t t -- - ---- S. W. 4/ST - STREET I:� 1.4 ip. 1 \i `, , j 0 'y'l .,;' n. .,.� 7 6 4 ,1 \\1, VALLEY GE r• 0� `I i1. HOSP % 1 y,.«. y,,.,. vYf�, •.t I I , /I/ : , , r 0 r=p .., e k .C P ,' 5 \\\ ' ! �� 1 ti3t• ,ryAz,yh $dY{Srt.w r��afl�#�� S t r t s pad b 5 yr �" ~ �k I h 4 sa 1 r TM ;lks[M; :.ttti.: 7.;: ' e r, e, ' „41 . fi v , ay 1 t cr 1— r e,X+ .;4, ,t ..fS�fs`�1.:�...;.+�,.'��w'4 ,. '+L+•3`�a',.af .::i> rt� '4 -:.�5' `.L-. •mop. �" y, , Ca rr OP t�EtaT . ii ,I ' /A .., IIi ,..yi'" 0.! i I F D �J. / 1 4-0 , I SOUTH LIND SQUARE-PHASE II ,.'; `...., P SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-079-87 1 APPLICANT MACKENZIE/SAITO ASSOCIATES, P.S. TOTAL AREA 4.37 ACRES j PRINCIPAL ACCESS LIND AVENUE S.W. 1 EXISTING ZONING M-P (MANUFACTURING PARK) EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED s PROPOSED USE PROPOSED BUILDING FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE. (54,250 SQ. FT. ) COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIP OPTION-OFFICE. 1 COMMENTS THE APPLICATION IF FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN APPROVAL. I # THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AND APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET SOUTH OF S.W. 41st STREET. , MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 _...� w December 7, 1987 City of Renton Attention: Donald K. Erickson 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: South Lind Square Phase II Project Number 387511 Dear Don: The purpose of this letter is to request reconsideration of the report and decision for site plan approval application Number SA-079-87 (South Lind Square Phase II). The site plan was approved with four conditions, our concern is in regard to condition number 1, specifically the underlined portion of the following: 1. That a revised landscape plan be prepared that: includes a large contiguous "natural " landscape area equal to at least 2% of the site be provided for wildlife habitat, as per Section 4-744(F)2. at the center of the site near the entrance to the courtyard; as well as indicates a common passive recreational area for employees with outdoor benches, tables, etc.; and the provision somewhere on the site a recreational court adequate for a basketball hoop or tennis backboard practice area. We believe that our client and his design team should be allowed the discretion to place the 2% "natural" landscape area in a location we feel is appropriate. The attached site plan illustrates an area which we believe is the most suitable for this type of plant material and environment. We are designing a quality facility. In lieu of the minimum 5% interior landscaping we are providing 9.5%. Our overall landscaping is double that which is required by minimum code standards. We believe the location we have selected is the most appropriate location for the following reasons: 1. The indicated area will be the quietest location due to its maximum distance from public streets and projected functional/operational use. 2. This location will be more centrally located with respect to the projects between 43rd and 41st. 3. This location will allow us to design this project so that the phase I and II portions of the project work well together and compliment each other. 4. The City's desired location would require eliminating over nine parking places which would have significant negative leasable impact. City of Renton Donald K. Erickson Project Number: 387511 December 7, 1987 Page Number 2 We thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, 04/14e4d) Lynn Takeuchi Arc itect HLT:lr Attachment cc: Rick Romney, Spieker Partners MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 •r' ,• _ .,! n, December 7, 1987 City of Renton Attention: Donald K. Erickson 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: South Lind Square Phase II Project Number 387511 Dear Don: The purpose of this letter is to request reconsideration of the report and decision for site plan approval application Number SA-079-87 (South Lind Square Phase II). The site plan was approved with four conditions, our concern is in regard to condition number 1, specifically the underlined portion of the following: 1. That a revised landscape plan be prepared that: includes a large contiguous "natural" landscape area equal to at least 2% of the site be provided for wildlife habitat, as per Section 4-744(F )2. at the center of the site near the entrance to the courtyard; as well as indicates a common passive recreational area for employees with outdoor benches, tables, etc.; and the provision somewhere on the site a recreational court adequate for a basketball hoop or tennis backboard practice area. We believe that our client and his design team should be allowed the discretion to place the 2% "natural" landscape area in a location we feel is appropriate. The attached site plan illustrates an area which we believe is the most suitable for this type of plant material and environment. We are designing a quality facility. In lieu of the minimum 5% interior landscaping we are providing 9.5%. Our overall landscaping is double that which is required by minimum code standards. We believe the location we have selected is the most appropriate location for the following reasons: 1. The indicated area will be the quietest location due to its maximum distance from public streets and projected functional/operational use. 2. This location will be more centrally located with respect to the projects between 43rd and 41st. �v 3. This location will allow us to design this project so that the phase I and II portions of the project work well together and compliment each other. 4. The City's desired location would require eliminating over nine parking places which would have significant negative leasable impact. City of Renton Donald K. Erickson Project Number: 387511 December 7, 1987 Page Number 2 We thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Udi-ef4a) Lynn Takeuchi Arc itect HLT:l r Attachment cc: Rick Romney, Spieker Partners i s MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. _ ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 December 7, 1987 City of Renton Attention: Donald K. Erickson 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: South Lind Square Phase II Project Number 387511 Dear Don: The purpose of this letter is to request reconsideration of the report and decision for site plan approval application Number SA-079-87 (South Lind Square Phase II). The site plan was approved with four conditions, our concern is in regard to condition number 1, specifically the underlined portion of the following: 1. That a revised landscape plan be prepared that: includes a large contiguous "natural" landscape area equal to at least 2% of the site be provided for wildlife habitat, as per Section 4-744(F )2. at the center of the site near the entrance to the courtyard; as well as indicates a common passive recreational area for employees with outdoor benches, tables, etc.; and the provision somewhere on the site a recreational court adequate for a basketball hoop or tennis backboard practice area. We believe that our client and his design team should be allowed the discretion to place the 2% "natural" landscape area in a location we feel is appropriate. The attached site plan illustrates an area which we believe is the most suitable for this type of plant material and environment. We are designing a quality facility. In lieu of the minimum 5% interior landscaping we are providing 9.5%. Our overall landscaping is double that which is required by minimum code standards. We believe the location we have selected is the most appropriate location for the following reasons: 1. The indicated area will be the quietest location due to its maximum distance from public streets and projected functional/operational use. 2. This location will be more centrally located with respect to the projects between 43rd and 41st. 3. This location will allow us to design this project so that the phase I and II portions of the project work well together and compliment each other. 4. The City's desired location would require eliminating over nine parking places which would have significant negative leasable impact. City of Renton Donald K. Erickson Project Number: 387511 December 7, 1987 Page Number 2 We thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, 001-(A4d) Lynn Takeuchi Arc itect HLT:lr Attachment cc: Rick Romney, Spieker Partners s:> MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. ' ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 y f Y7' a I h December 7, 1987 City of Renton Attention: Donald K. Erickson 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: South Lind Square Phase II Project Number 387511 Dear Don: ,- The purpose of this letter is to request reconsideration of the report and decision for site plan approval application Number SA-079-87 (South Lind Square Phase II). The site plan was approved with four conditions, our concern is in regard to condition number 1, specifically the underlined portion of the following: 1. That a revised landscape plan be prepared that: includes a large contiguous "natural " landscape area equal to at least 2% of the site be provided for wildlife habitat, as per Section 4-744(F)2. at the center of the site near the entrance to the courtyard; as well as indicates a common passive recreational area for employees with outdoor benches, tables, etc.; and the provision somewhere on the site a recreational court adequate for a basketball hoop or tennis backboard practice area. We believe that our client and his design team should be allowed the discretion to place the 2% "natural" landscape area in a location we feel is appropriate. The attached site plan illustrates an area which we believe is the most suitable for this type of plant material and environment. We are designing a quality facility. In lieu of the minimum 5% interior landscaping we are providing 9.5%. Our overall landscaping is double that which is required by minimum code standards. We believe the location we have selected is the most appropriate location for the following reasons: 1. The indicated area will be the quietest location due to its maximum distance from public streets and projected functional/operational use. 2. This location will be more centrally located with respect to the projects between 43rd and 41st. 3. This location will allow us to design this project so that the phase I and II portions of the project work well together and compliment each other. 4. The City's desired location would require eliminating over nine parking places which would have significant negative leasable impact. City of Renton Donald K. Erickson Project Number: 387511 December 7, 1987 Page Number 2 We thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, 04111€ Lynn Takeuchi Arc itect HLT:l r Attachment cc: Rick Romney, Spieker Partners MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. ,... ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 • I BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 December 7, 1987 City of Renton Attention: Donald K. Erickson 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: South Lind Square Phase II Project Number 387511 - Dear Don: The purpose of this letter is to request reconsideration of the report and decision for site plan approval application Number SA-079-87 (South Lind Square Phase II). The site plan was approved with four conditions, our concern is in regard to condition number 1, specifically the underlined portion of the following: 1. That a revised landscape plan be prepared that: includes a large contiguous "natural " landscape area equal to at least 2% of the site be provided for wildlife habitat, as per Section 4-744(F )2. at the center of the site near the entrance to the courtyard; as well as indicates a common passive recreational area for employees with outdoor benches, tables, etc. ; and the provision somewhere on the site a recreational court adequate for a basketball hoop or tennis backboard practice area. We believe that our client and his design team should be allowed the discretion to place the 2% "natural" landscape area in a location we feel is appropriate. The attached site plan illustrates an area which we believe is the most suitable for this type of plant material and environment. We are designing a quality facility. In lieu of the minimum 5% interior landscaping we are providing 9.5%. Our overall landscaping ` is double that which is required by minimum code standards. We believe the location we have selected is the most appropriate location for the following reasons: 1. The indicated area will be the quietest location due to its maximum distance from public streets and projected functional/operational use. 2. This location will be more centrally located with respect to the projects between 43vd- and 41st. 3. This location will allow us to design this project so that the phase I and II portions of the project work well together and compliment each other. 4. The City's desired location would require eliminating over nine parking places which would have significant negative leasable impact. City of Renton Donald K. Erickson Project Number: 387511 December 7, 1987 Page Number 2 We thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, 0.01-P4</k Lynn Takeuchi Arc itect HLT:lr Attachment cc: Rick Romney, Spieker Partners MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. 1 ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 December 7, 1987 City of Renton Attention: Donald K. Erickson 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: South Lind Square Phase II Project Number 387511 Dear Don: The purpose of this letter is to request reconsideration of the report and decision for site plan approval application Number SA-079-87 (South Lind Square Phase II). The site plan was approved with four conditions, our concern is in regard to condition number 1, specifically the underlined portion of the following: 1. That a revised landscape plan be prepared that: includes a large contiguous "natural" landscape area equal to at least 2% of the site be provided for wildlife habitat, as per Section 4-744(F)2. at the center of the site near the entrance to the courtyard; as well as indicates a common passive recreational area for employees with outdoor benches, tables, etc.; and the provision somewhere on the site a recreational court adequate for a basketball hoop or tennis backboard practice area. We believe that our client and his design team should be allowed the discretion to place the 2% "natural" landscape area in a location we feel is appropriate. The attached site plan illustrates an area which we believe is the most suitable for this type of plant material and environment. We are designing a quality facility. In lieu of the minimum 5% interior landscaping we are providing 9.5%. Our overall landscaping is double that which is required by minimum code standards. We believe the location we have selected is the most appropriate location for the following reasons: 1. The indicated area will be the quietest location due to its maximum distance from public streets and projected functional/operational use. 2. This location will be more centrally located with respect to the projects between 43rd and 41st. 3. This location will allow us to design this project so that the phase I and II portions of the project work well together and compliment each other. 4. The City's desired location would require eliminating over nine parking places which would have significant negative leasable impact. City of Renton Donald K. Erickson Project Number: 387511 December 7, 1987 Page Number 2 We thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, , h Lynn Takeuchi Arc itect HLT:lr Attachment cc: Rick Romney, Spieker Partners MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. : - ARCHITECTS—PLANNERS ' 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 • I BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 • ' spar December 7, 1987 City of Renton Attention: Donald K. Erickson 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: South Lind Square Phase II Project Number 387511 $. Dear Don: The purpose of this letter is to request reconsideration of the report and decision for site plan approval application Number SA-079-87 (South Lind Square Phase II). The site plan was approved with four conditions, our concern is in regard to condition number 1, specifically the underlined portion of the following: 1. That a revised landscape plan be prepared that: includes a large contiguous "natural" landscape area equal to at least 2% of the site be provided for wildlife habitat, as per Section 4-744(F )2. at the center of the site near the entrance to the courtyard; as well as indicates a common passive recreational area for employees with outdoor benches, tables, etc. ; and the provision somewhere on the site a recreational court adequate for a basketball hoop or tennis backboard practice area. We believe that our client and his design team should be allowed the discretion to place the 2% "natural" landscape area in a location we feel is appropriate. The attached site plan illustrates an area which we believe is the most suitable for this type of plant material and environment. We are designing a quality facility. In lieu of the minimum 5% interior landscaping we are providing 9.5%. Our overall landscaping is double that which is required by minimum code' standards. We believe the location we have selected is the most appropriate location for the following reasons: 1. The indicated area will be the quietest location due to its maximum distance from public streets and projected functional/operational use. 2. This location will be more centrally located with respect to the projects between 43rd and 41st. 3. This location will allow us to design this project so that the phase I and II portions of the project work well together and compliment each other. 4. The City's desired location would require eliminating over nine parking places which would have significant negative leasable impact. City of Renton Donald K. Erickson Project Number: 387511 December 7, 1987 Page Number 2 We thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, 044'44) Lynn Takeuchi Arc itect HLT:lr Attachment cc: Rick Romney, Spieker Partners MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. - ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS I 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 _ .n December 7, 1987 City of Renton Attention: Donald K. Erickson 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: South Lind Square Phase II Project Number 387511 Dear Don: The purpose of this letter is to request reconsideration of the report and decision for site plan approval application Number SA-079-87 (South Lind Square Phase II). The site plan was approved with four conditions, our concern is in regard to condition number 1, specifically the underlined portion of the following: 1. That a revised landscape plan be prepared that: includes a large contiguous "natural" landscape area equal to at least 2% of the site be provided for wildlife habitat, as per Section 4-744(F )2. at the center of the site near the entrance to the courtyard; as well as indicates a common passive recreational area for employees with outdoor benches, tables, etc.; . and the provision somewhere on the site a recreational court adequate for a basketball hoop or tennis backboard practice area. We believe that our client and his design team should be allowed the discretion to place the 2% "natural" landscape area in a location we feel is appropriate. The attached site plan illustrates an area which we believe is the most suitable for this type of plant material and environment. We are designing a quality facility. In lieu of the minimum 5% interior landscaping we are providing 9.5%. Our overall landscaping is double that which is required by minimum code standards. We believe the location we have selected is the most appropriate location for the following reasons: 1. The indicated area will be the quietest location due to its maximum distance from public streets and projected functional/operational use. 2. This location will be more centrally located with respect to the projects between 43rd and 41st. 3. This location will allow us to design this project so that the phase I and II portions of the project work well together and compliment each other. 4. The City's desired location would require eliminating over nine parking places which would have significant negative leasable impact. City of Renton Donald K. Erickson Project Number: 387511 December 7, 1987 Page Number 2 We thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lynn Takeuchi Arc itect HLT:lr Attachment cc: Rick Romney, Spieker Partners MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. " • ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 • BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 . 4,.•,2 December 7, 1987 City of Renton Attention: Donald K. Erickson 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: South Lind Square Phase II Project Number 387511 Dear Don: The purpose of this letter is to request reconsideration of the report and decision for site plan approval application Number SA-079-87 (South Lind Square Phase II). The site plan was approved with four conditions, our concern is in regard to condition number 1, specifically the underlined portion of the following: 1. That a revised landscape plan be prepared that: includes a large contiguous "natural" landscape area equal to at least 2% of the site be provided for wildlife habitat, as per Section 4-744(F)2. at the center of the site near the entrance to the courtyard; as well as indicates a common passive recreational area for employees with outdoor benches, tables, etc.; and the provision somewhere on the site a recreational court adequate for a basketball hoop or tennis backboard practice area. We believe that our client and his design team should be allowed the discretion to place the 2% "natural" landscape area in a location we feel is appropriate. The attached site plan illustrates an area which we believe is the most suitable for this type of plant material and environment. We are designing a quality facility. In lieu of the minimum 5% interior landscaping we are providing 9.5%. Our overall landscaping is double that which is required by minimum code standards. We believe the location we have selected is the most appropriate location for the following reasons: 1. The indicated area will be the quietest location due to its maximum distance from public streets and projected functional/operational use. 2. This location will be more centrally located with respect to the projects between 43rd and 41st. 3. This location will allow us to design this project so that the phase I and II portions of the project work well together and compliment each other. 4. The City's desired location would require eliminating over nine parking places which would have significant negative leasable impact. City of Renton Donald K. Erickson Project Number: 387511 December 7, 1987 Page Number 2 We thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, 0041"(4‘) Lynn Takeuchi Arc itect HLT:lr Attachment cc: Rick Romney, Spieker Partners MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. -" • ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 I BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 r- •_ :, ,`�.. December 7, 1987 City of Renton Attention: Donald K. Erickson 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: South Lind Square Phase II Project Number 387511 Dear Don: The purpose of this letter is to request reconsideration of the report and decision for site plan approval application Number SA-079-87 (South Lind Square Phase II). The site plan was approved with four conditions, our concern is in regard to condition number 1, specifically the underlined portion of the following: 1. That a revised landscape plan be prepared that: includes a large contiguous "natural" landscape area equal to at least 2% of the site be provided for wildlife habitat, as per Section 4-744(F )2. at the center of the site near the entrance to the courtyard; as well as indicates a common passive recreational area for employees with outdoor benches, tables, etc.; and the provision somewhere on the site a recreational court adequate for a basketball hoop or tennis backboard practice area. CJ We believe that our client and his design team should be allowed the discretion to place the 2% "natural" landscape area in a location we feel is appropriate. The attached site plan illustrates an area which we believe is the most suitable for this type of plant material and environment. We are designing a quality facility. In lieu of the minimum 5% interior landscaping we are providing 9.5%. Our overall landscaping is double that which is required by minimum code standards. We believe the location we have selected is the most appropriate location for the following reasons: "` 1. The indicated area will be the quietest location due to its maximum distance from public streets and projected functional/operational use. 2. This location will be more centrally located with respect to the projects between 43rd and 41st. 3. This location will allow us to design this project so that the phase I and II portions of the project work well together and compliment each other. 4. The City's desired location would require eliminating over nine parking places , which would have significant negative leasable impact. City of Renton Donald K. Erickson Project Number: 387511 December 7, 1987 Page Number 2 We thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, e1( Odiffrid; Lynn Takeuchi Arc itect HLT:lr Attachment cc: Rick Romney, Spieker Partners MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. , ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 December 7, 1987 City of Renton Attention: Donald K. Erickson 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: South Lind Square Phase II Project Number 387511 Dear Don: The purpose of this letter is to request reconsideration of the report and decision for site plan approval application Number SA-079-87 (South Lind Square Phase II). The site plan was approved with four conditions, our concern is in regard to condition number 1, specifically the underlined portion of the following: 1. That a revised landscape plan be prepared that: includes a large contiguous "natural" landscape area equal to at least 2% of the site be provided for wildlife habitat, as per Section 4-744(F)2. at the center of the site near the entrance to the courtyard; as well as indicates a common passive recreational area for employees with outdoor benches, tables, etc.; and the provision somewhere on the site a recreational court adequate for a basketball hoop or tennis backboard practice area. We believe that our client and his design team should be allowed the discretion to place the 2% "natural" landscape area in a location we feel is appropriate. The -- attached site plan illustrates an area which we believe is the most suitable for this type of plant material and environment. We are designing a quality facility. In lieu of the minimum 5% interior landscaping we are providing 9.5%. Our overall landscaping is double that which is required by minimum code standards. We believe the location we have selected is the most appropriate location for the following reasons: 1. The indicated area will be the quietest location due to its maximum distance from public streets and projected functional/operational use. 2. This location will be more centrally located with respect to the projects between 43rd and 41st. 3. This location will allow us to design this project so that the phase I and II portions of the project work well together and compliment each other. 4. The City's desired location would require eliminating over nine parking places which would have significant negative leasable impact. City of Renton Donald K. Erickson Project Number: 387511 December 7, 1987 Page Number 2 We thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, 041-1(4eZ Lynn Takeuchi Arc itect HLT:l r Attachment cc: Rick Romney, Spieker Partners ae';404, isinga CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 9, 1988 Mr. Clayton Moss Sign Tech 20021 Ballinger Way N.E. , Suite B Seattle, WA 98155 Subject: Sign requirements for South Lind Square Dear Mr. Moss: The Renton Building and Zoning Department is in receipt of your letter regarding sign code requirements for the project, South Lind Square. You have asked us to consider your client's desire in incorporating a ground-hugging monument sign to fit in with the corporate image of the project and to consider a reduction of setback requirements for this type sign. South Lind Square is located in a portion of the valley which is zoned M-P, Manufacturing Park. The City's sign code requires that signs in this zone be set back a distance of 20 feet from property lines. This requirement applies to both pole type signs and monument type signs, such as you have inquired about. At this time, no reduction in the setback is provided for the lower, monument type signs. It is, however, the City's desire to encourage developers to employ the use of monument type signs in their projects, as we, also, feel that they are more attractive and fitting in a quality development. It is the intent of the City to explore methods of modifying the sign code to encourage monument signs such as you have proposed. Unfortunately for South Lind Square, the 20 foot setback must prevail at this time for their proposed sign. This distance is really not that much greater than the setback distance given under the City of Kent's code, which, as you have stated, works particularly well. For example, a 6 foot high monument sign in Kent would require a 16 foot setback. Renton's code, on the other hand, requires only 4 additional feet for the same sign. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Mr. Clayton Moss , February 9, 1988 Page Two Finally, as mentioned, Renton is exploring ways of revising the sign code. At this writing, no specific recommendation has been made with respect to setbacks in the M-P Zone. We will, however, consider your input on this matter. If you have any further questions or suggestions, please feel free to contact me at this office. erely, if V Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator DKE/JFL/adk JFL:a:mossltr „ c=I,'lni ZUU,t b iiiilgai Say N .BUSS b 4 P,anners/Dr ors/Builders Seattle,Washingtc 55 —O7�—� (206)361-6367 SA CITY OF RENTON :t, I) EIVE JAN 2 5 1988 January 12, 1988 BUILDING/ZONING, DEPT. City of Renton Attn: Donald Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 Re: Renton Sign Setback Requirements We have been referred to you by Jim Hansen of the Planning Dept. He is aware of the problems we and others involved in the design of signage are finding with the current sign setback requirements in Renton and has guided us to you for a solution. The project that we are currently working on, South Lind Square, is a good example of a few of the problems involved. We have designed a low—lying above grade architectural sign made of concrete with embossed graphics. The site is laid out such that the property line from which the setback is calculated is 10 feet +/— in from the street, which means that the sign must be sited no closer than 30 feet from the street to meet code. It is impossible at that distance to read the sign that we have designed. We could solve this problem by designing a pole mounted sign or a tall vertical sign that would allow identification for passing traffic from 30 feet, however; there are several reasons that we prefer to use a smaller sign. Our clients' development is a professional business park. Contemporary architectural sign design incorporates ground hugging monument signs of the type we have designed because they are generally more attractive and less obtrusive than pole signage and fit the corporate image our clients require. When properly sited such signs provide identification and direction for passing motorists as well as pole mounted signs and do not necessitate a 20 foot setback for safety reasons as they are not at all likely to fall, and if one were to fall it certainly could not do any damage beyond it's height. We feel that the Renton sign codes setback requirements fail to address the difference between these types of signage, and encourage the use of pole mounted vertical signs when something more attractive and subtle would do the job just as well, or better. City of Renton Attn: Donald Erickson, AICP January 12, 1988 Page Two Other municipalities, Bellevue, Kirkland, Redmond, Kent, Seattle, Bothell etc. have incorporated setback requirements starting from 5 feet and have maintained public safety, easy identification for passing motorists and attractive communities. • We feel that the Kent sign code setbacks work particularly well. They allow one foot of height for each foot of setback beginning with 10 • feet up to a maximum of 20 feet. We would like to propose for your consideration that the Renton "Planning Department" adopt such a formula in their sign code. Thank you for your consideration of this matter, I would be very • pleased to discuss this with you further. If you have any questions or comments please give me a call. • Sincerely, SIGNTECH Clayton Moss Senior Designer kmw cc: Earl Clymer, Mayor of Renton Jim Hansen, Planning Department • • • MACKENZIE/SAI I U & ASSOCIATES, PS. ARCI1ITECTS-PLANNERS 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 CITY ^+= RENTON December 10, 1987 DEC'1 151(87 ZO1.1P DEPT. City of Renton Attention: Jerry Lind 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: South Lind Square Phase II Project 387511 Dear Jerry: The purpose of this letter is to reconfirm our telephone conversation on December 9th regarding the 2% wildlife habitat landscape location. It was agreed to that we would eliminate one parking stall on either end of the central landscape island, convert the remaining parking stalls from standard to compact, and reduce the aisle width to allow for a 4 ft. increase in the landscape island width. This will provide approximately 2,890 sq. ft. of the required 3,800 sq. ft. ( 2% of the gross site area) for "natural landscaping." The remaining 910 sq. ft. required will be located within the southern landscape median. As requested by the Site Plan Review Committee, three pedestrian pathways have been added to interconnect all three buildings and improve pedestrian site circulation. A baketball hoop located at the center of the southern parking area and outdoor tables and chairs within the southeast courtyard/plaza area will provide for on site recreational needs. Enclosed is an updated copy of the site plan reflecting these changes. We believe this is an equitable and workable compromise and appreciate your timely reconsideration of this matter. Thank you for your time. Please call if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, 12J 6 Paul Engert PE:mo: lr Enclosure: Site Plan, Rev. 4, dated 10/28/87 cc: Donald K. Erickson - City of Renton Rick Romney - Spieker Partners Lynn Takeuchi - MSA MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. ' ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 - • BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 December 7, 1987 City of Renton Attention: Donald K. Erickson 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: South Lind Square Phase II Project Number 387511 Dear Don: The purpose of this letter is to request reconsideration of the report and decision for site plan approval application Number SA-079-87 (South Lind Square Phase II) . The site plan was approved with four conditions, our concern is in regard to condition number 1, specifically the underlined portion of the following: 1. That a revised landscape plan be prepared that: includes a large contiguous "natural" landscape area equal to at least 2% of the site be provided for wildlife habitat, as per Section 4-744(F )2. at the center of the site near the entrance to the courtyard; as well as indicates a common passive recreational area for employees with outdoor benches, tables, etc. ; and the provision somewhere on the site a recreational court adequate for a basketball hoop or tennis backboard practice area. We believe that our client and his design team should be allowed the discretion to place the 2% "natural " landscape area in a location we feel is appropriate. The attached site plan illustrates an area which we believe is the most suitable for this type of plant material and environment. We are designing a quality facility. In lieu of the minimum 5% interior landscaping we are providing 9.5%. Our overall landscaping is double that which is required by minimum code standards. We believe the location we have selected is the most appropriate location for the following reasons: 1. The indicated area will be the quietest location due to its maximum distance from public streets and projected functional/operational use. 2. This location will be more centrally located with respect to the projects between 43rd and 41st. 3. This location will allow us to design this project so that the phase I and II portions of the project work well together and compliment each other. 4. The City's desired location would require eliminating over nine parking places which would have significant negative leasable impact. City of Renton Donald K. Erickson Project Number: 387511 December 7, 1987 Page Number 2 We thank you for your time and consideration. Please call if you have any. questions. Sincerely, 04/i/md) Lynn Takeuchi Arc itect HLT:lr Attachment cc: Rick Romney, Spieker Partners \\, �,� 5 -- �7 -yY METRO- Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 December 2 , 1987 Cis n RENTON ill OE03 -1987 I Mr. Ronald G. Nelson, Director City of Renton „ F E �„ , Building and Zoning Department ` = ?r� '. .n 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Nelson: Attached is the Metro staff comment letter for the City of Renton' s Determination of Non-Significance on File No. ECF-071- 87, SA-079-87 . The letter was mailed to the City of Seattle by mistake, and was returned to us today. Although the comment period for this SEPA document has elapsed, we would appreciate your consideration of our comments. Si cerely, J. . McFar and, Planner En ironmen al Planning Division JKM:ymg Attachment raMETRO---- /1 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 November 23, 1987 Mr. Ronald G. Nelson, Director City of Renton Building & Zoning Department R E C V E D 200 Mill Avenue South NOV 3 0 1987 Renton, WA 98055 DEPT.07 CLit,i i{iiL'utha u LAND USE Determination of Non-Significance File No. ECF-071-87, SA-079-87 Mackenzie/Saito & Associates Dear Mr. Nelson: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no signi- ficant impacts to its wastewater facilities. Public Transportation The checklist should be corrected to note that the site is served by routes 163 and 247 along Lind Avenue. Also, with 100-125 employees in an office/warehouse building, the figure of 952 trips generated per day seems high. This project is proposed in the Renton Valley industrial area which is experiencing severe traffic congestion. Therefore, Metro recommends that the developer be required to prepare a Transportation Management Plan (TSM) to specify how "carpooling measures" (p. 10 ) would be promoted. For further information and questions, contact Carol Thompson, Market Development, at 684-1610 Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Very truly yours , Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB: jmw cc: Carol Thompson • 51067 Le IPA) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL NOTICE OF DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON Audrey Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath states The Environmental Review Committee (ERC)has issued a Determination of NON- that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the follow- ing project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Appli/•ant(s) VALLEY DAILY NEWS have completed a mitigation process pursu- ant to WAC 197-11-350. • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. Daily 54,250 newspapers six (6) times a week.That said newspapers Application for Site Approval ofr a general publishedsq. ft. building to be used for general are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six office/warehouse on a 190,425 sq. ft. site. monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to,printed andpublished ness Property located o Lot 8 of the CKorll er of Hess Center/Renton at the S.E. Corner of in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Lind Ave. and S.W. 41st. File Nos: ECF- County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal 071-87,SA-079-87. Further information regarding this action newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for is available in the Building and Zoning King County. Department, Municipal Building, Renton, The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Washington, 235-2540. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the City of Renton , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in Hearing Examiner by December 16,1987. supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers In addition Site Plan Approval for project was also approved and the appeal period during the below stated period.The annexed notice a shall eno at 5:00 p.m. on December 16, Notice ofEnvironment/1 Determination 1987. Published in the Valley Daily News was published on D-e-c a r 2 , 1987 R2651 • December 2,1987.R2651 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 16 . 0 0 Subscribed and sworn to before this 16th day of De cembelt9 87 , 127 Notar ublic for the State of Washington, r : ,k� � ,- residing at Federal Way, ` ' Y, King County, Washington. G _ v �: � \ � � VDN#87 Revised 11/86 . T3 = . :; j 1 " NNG DEPT. NotEnvirDet/Dsk Pub12287 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. Application for Site Approval of a 54,250 sq. ft. building to be used for general office/warehouse on a 190, 425 sq. ft. site. Property located on Lot 8 of the Koll Business Center/Renton at the S.E. Corner of Lind Ave. and S.W. 41st. File Nos. ECF-071-87, SA-079-87. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2540. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by December 16, 1987. In addition Site Plan Approval for project was also approved and the appeal period shall end at 5: 00 p.m. on December 16, 1987. Published: December 2, 1987 F,STATe ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER � v Director lees ao STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 45 1s111111...,vELOPMENT DEPARTIVtEe. „(QF RENTON November 23, 1987 \wil NOV 2 5 1987 Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Sirs : Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the construction of a general office and warehouse by Mackenzie/Saito and Associates (ECF-071-87) . We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the follow- ing comments . The proposed project must comply with the goals and standards of the local shoreline master program. If you have any questions, please call Ms. Terra Prodan of the Shorelands Program at (206) 459-6789. Sincerely, Barbara J. Ritchie Environmental Review Section BJR: cc: Linda Rankin, Shorelands I ' • N OT C E ENVIRoNMENTAL I , DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-071-87, SA-079-87 APPLICANT MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. I . PROPOSED ACTION SITE APPROVAL OF A 544.250 SQ. FT. BUILDING TO BE USED FOR GENERAL OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON A 190,425 SQ . FT . SITE . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS PROPERTY LOCATED ON LOT 8 OF THE KOLL BUSINESS CENTER/RENTON AT THE S.E. CORNER OF LIND AVE . AND S.W. 41ST. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES 50 DOES NOT I HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON. THE ENVIRONMENT. I , AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., DECEMBER 16, 1987 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. 1 SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICATION NO. : SA-079-87 APPLICANT: Mackenzie/Saito & Associates,P.S. . LOCATION: Located Lot 8f of the Koll Business Center/Renton at the S.E. corner of lind Ave. and S.W. 41st St. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Application for Site Plan Approval to construct a 54,250 sq.ft. building 'to be used for general , office and warehouses purposes. COMMITTEE REVIEW: The review was conducted at 11:00 a.m. on November 25, 1987, in the third floor conference room of the Renton Municipal Building. The Committee review was conducted after receiving written comment from all divisions of the Public Works Department, both divisions of the Building and Zoning Department, and the Fire, Police,. Parks and Policy Development Departments. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1 Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2 Site plan (received October 15, 1987) . Exhibit No. 3 Landscape plan (received September 10, 1987) . Exhibit No. 4 Building elevation plans. FINDINGS. CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the Site Plan Review Committee now makes and enters the following: Findings: 1. The applicant, Mackenzie/Saito & Associates, P.S. , has requested site plan approval to allow the development of a 54, 250 sq. ft. building to be used for general office/warehouse on a 190,425 sq. ft. site located on Lot 8 of the koll Business Center/Renton, at the S.E. corner of Lind Avenue and S.W. 41st. 2. The applicant's file containing the application, the state Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various 'City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43 .21C 1971 as amended) , a Determination of Non- significance - Mitigated was issued for the subject proposal on October 28, 1987, with the following conditions: a. That the applicant mitigate the anticipated traffic impacts of this development by providing a traffic mitigation fee of $156,463; Site Plan Review C aittee City of Renton Report and Decision Page 2 NOTE: This fee is based upon a breakdown of the project into 75 percent office use at 17.7 AWVT per 1, 000 s. f. and 25 percent light industrial at 5.43 AWVT per 1,000 s. f. b. That the applicant provide passive recreation opportunities on site; c. That the applicant participate in providing off-site recreational opportunities in the Valley either through a financial contribution or by developing or assisting in the development of a project as identified in the master recreation plan for the Valley; and d. That the southerly entrance off Lind Avenue S.W. be 15 feet from curb to property-line, for a total 30-foot drive-way when the property to the south develops. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. The subject proposal is only partially consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Commercial, this being for the office component which is considered commercial. 6. The site plan as presented provides parking in excess of what is required to comply with the Parking and Loading Ordinance of the City of Renton. 7. The subject site was annexed into the City in 1959 by the adoption of Ordinance 1764. The site was rezoned from G to M-P in March of 1976 by Ordinance 3016. The subject proposal is consistent with the Manufacturing Park (M-P) zoning designation for the site. 8. Land uses surroundingtthe subject site are a mixture of light industrial and commercial uses. 9. The applicant's site plan complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. 10. Section 4-738 (D, 1) lists ten criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Approval application. These include the following: General Criteria: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; As noted above, the subject proposal is in general compliance with the land use designation of Commercial, shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Land Use Goal of the Valley Plan states: "To promote development of the Valley in a diversity of high quality industrial uses, together with commercial and office uses. " Staff believe this proposal is consistent with this goal, and does provide the sought after diversity. ,-The subject proposal is also consistent with the Manufacturing Park land use designation even though the site is shown as Commercial. The former designation suggests that sites be characterized by adequate setbacks, landscaping, design standards, wildlife habitat and open space, and minimum impacts form noise, glare, traffic, air and water pollution, and safety hazards. In terms of the Urban Design Goal and Policies Staff note that the proposal does provide ample landscaping and endeavors to provide a pleasant environment and enhance the visual experience from adjacent properties and that 1 Site Plan Review Cc.:...ittee City 'of Renton Report and Decision Page 3 parking and loading areas generally are adequately screened and landscaped. With the conditions contained herein the applicant will be providing the required 2% natural landscaping required for wetland mitigation and wildlife habitat. b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; Building and Zoning Department staff have reviewed the subject proposal and found it to be in compliance with all the provisions of the M-P Zone. Whereas, only 215 off-street parking spaces are required, the applicants are providing 226 parking spaces on site. Also, recommendations contained in this report will make the subject proposal comply with the landscaping provisions of Section 4-744 or the Building Regulations of the City. c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The subject proposal is not expected to adversely effect surrounding properties. The closest development is to the immediate south on S.W. 43rd Street. The one story building will be set back more than 60 feet from the south property line and an existing service road. No adverse impacts are anticipated here and a 5 '-13 ' landscape buffer strip will be maintained here. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; Since this is the second phase of a two phase project and few, if any, recreational amenities for employees were provided in the first phase if development, Staff are seeking such amenities in this phase to serve the whole project. In addition, we are seeking clearly delineated pedestrian routes or pathways through planting areas to major streets with sidewalks as well as linkages between the buildings that will be provided on the site. Staff believe this can be achieved by reducing the 11 excess parking spaces currently proposed on the site. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The subject development is expected to ,maintain or enhance area-wide property values. Although the density of the subject development, in terms of floor area ratio, is relatively low. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; As noted above, this is an area where improvement is being sought by Staff. Concerns relate more to pedestrian safety and ease of movement throughout the site and between buildings and public streets more than vehicular circulation. In many ways, it is unfortunate that so much of the site is relegated to parking at the expense of usable or visual open space for employees and visitors. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The buildings are laid out such that they should receive good light and air exposure. . L Site Plan Review Cc. ittee City of Renton Report and Decision Page 4 h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The subject proposal is not anticipated to result in any known unhealthy situations as a consequence of operations occurring within the building. Unhealthy conditions such as potential conflicts between pedestrians and autos are addressed elsewhere in this report. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and As noted above the site is adequately served with sewer and water lines sufficient to accommodate the proposed scale of development. j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. As noted above the subject proposal is not expected to have a deleterious effect on the surrounding area. Conclusions: 1. The subject proposal generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2 . Specific issues raised by various City departments focused on: adequacy of open space; appropriateness of landscape materials; excessive parking; off-site recreational needs; pedestrian access and internal site circulation; and natural area 2% landscaping. 3. A number of these issues were already addressed by the Environmental Review Committee when it issued its Determination of Non-significance - Mitigated for this project. 4 . Areas not addressed and falling under the realm of site plan approval include appropriateness of landscape materials, pedestrian circulation, wildlife habitat landscaping and appropriateness of proposed landscape materials, and possibly architectural character and compatibility with neighboring properties. 3 . The proposal only partially complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Commercial, but does comply with the present zoning classification of Manufacturing Park (M-P) . Decision: The site plan for South Lind Square, File No. SA-079-87, is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That a revised landscape plan be prepared that: includes a large contiguous "natural" landscape area equal to at least 2% of the site be provided for wildlife habitat, as per Section 4-744 (F) 2. at the center of the site near the entrance to the courtyard; as well as indicates a common passive recreational area for employees with outdoor benches, tables, etc. ; and the provision somewhere on the site a recreational court adequate for a basketball hoop or tennis backboard practice area. 2 . That a system of clearly delineated pedestrian pathways be provided throughout the site connecting all three buildings to one another as well as to sidewalked public streets. 1 Site Plan Review C :ittee City of Renton Report and Decision Page 5 3 . That a less aggressive tree than London Plane trees which are notorious for heaving sidewalk and paved areas be specified which like all landscaping shall be acceptable to the City's landscape architect. 4. In order to help facilitate the achievement of the above that the maximum number of parking spaces to be provided on the, site not exceed 215 spaces and that the number of compact stall provided shall reflect the maximum permitted under code. For the purpose of these decisions,, the term "should" and "shall" are to be considered mandatory and the term 01may" is considered discretionary. Notes to Applicant: An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work begun prior to the exhaustion of the 14-day appeal period and/or for work which may consequently be stopped by an appeal or work required to be altered or returned to its preconstruction state, may begin construction activities with the issuance of the proper permits. ORDERED THIS 25th day of November, 1987, on behalf of the Site Plan Review Committee. Donald K. Erickson, AICP For The Site Plan Review Committee TRANSMITTED THIS 25th day of November, 1987 to the parties of record: Lynn Takeuchi 300 120th Ave. N.E. Bldg. 3 Suite 233 Bellevue, Washington, 98005 Spieker Partners 11400 S.E. 8th Bellevue, Washington 98004 TRANSMITTED THIS 25th day of November, 1987, to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Dir. Members Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building and Zoning Dir. Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal 4. Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Site Plan Review C littee City of Renton Report and Decision Page 6 REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before December 7, 1987. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of the decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011(B) (1) , which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on December 7 , 1987, accompanied by a $75.00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits al,l interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. • DEocs November 25, 1987 • oUo IC NOII NOTICE OF,ENVIRONMENTAL I , DETERMINATION AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON- - being first duly sworn on oath states SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the follow- , 2.u dis t Lc of Cl ° Ing project(s) under the authority of-the- -' that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Renton Municipal'Code..The Applicant(s) -have completed a mitigation process pursu- ant to WAC 197-11-350. VALLEY DAILY NEWS MACKENZIE/SAITO&ASSOCIATES .Application for Site Approval of a 54,250 • Kent Edition •• Renton Edition •• Auburn Edition sq.-ft. building to be used for general- office/warehouse on a 190,425 sq. ft. site: Daily newspapers published six (6)times a week.That said newspapers located on Lot 8 of the Koll Business Cen- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six and S.W.41st.at the S.E. Corner of Lind . g � and S.W. months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published Further information regarding thie a• ction in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ! la available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building,. Renton, County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Washington, 235-2550. Anygappeal of ERC newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for • action must be filed with.the:City'of Renton Hearing Examiner by November 24,1987. King County. , Published in the Valley Daily News Nov, 9,1987 R2605. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition } , Renton Edition x , Auburn Edition , (and not in • supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a i,;LLice of Lriviruturien"al Determination was published on November 9, 19d7 R2605 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ - 19.20 • • Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19_ 1'jtt� November is • Notar ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. tt""� VDN#87 Revised 11/86 f ;i -, -, L `� `� i�i ji DCC _3 ..5i.B/ NotEnvirDet/Dsk Pub NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES Application for Site Approval of a 54,250 sq.ft. building to be used for general office/warehouse on a 190,425 sq. ft. site: located on Lot 8 of the Koll Business Center/Renton at the S.E. Corner of Lind Ave. and S.W. 41st. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by November 24, 1987 Published: November 9, 1987 CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director November 6, 1987 Washington State Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, Washington 98504 Dear Sir: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance (Mitigated) for Mackenzie/Saito & Asssociates, File No. ECF-071-87, SA-079-87. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550.. Sincerely, la�,rnm Donald K. Erickson, A CP Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:cs 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 0 CITY OF RENTON "LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT { Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director • November 6, 1987 Mr. Gerald W. Marbett Bldg. and Land, Dev. Div. 450 King County Admin. Bldg. Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Sir: • Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance (Mitigated) for Mackenzie/Saito & Asssociates, File No. ECF-071-87, SA-079-87. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. Sincerely, IL)_&ikra(L 5,1/2Akaav Donald K. Erickson, A M I P Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:cs 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 &lo l e6D ti CITY OF RENTON sal • • BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ' Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director November 6, 1987 • MacKenzie/Saito & Associates 300 120th Ave. N.E. Bldg. 3 Suite 233 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Dear Sir: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance (Mitigated) for Mackenzie/Saito & Asssociates, File No. ECF-071-87, SA-079-87. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AIC Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:cs 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 &lo1e6D 4$ CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director November 6, 1987 • Carol Thompson Market Development Metro MS 52, 821 Second Ave. Seattle, WA 98104 Ms. Thompson: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance (Mitigated) for Mackenzie/Saito & Asssociates, File No. ECF-071-87, SA-079-87. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. Sincerely, ksyv.oak ml, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:cs 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 1 . MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. .. .. ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS . 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 November 2., 1987 " _ u Gt; • + _ �1, f:'\ City of Renton - Traffic Division Lj I! • Q.. L,. ., -1 1 Attention: - Gary Norris . • • �„ 200 Mill Ave; South Bun_r f ,; /7 [` ►'`n n P:r. .. 1 -Renton, Washington 98055 - RE: South Lind Square Phase II . Project Number 387511 . Dear Gary: .. The purpose of this letter is to provide you with additional information with respect ' . to captioned project and the intended use of the Phase II building as well as the' existing use of the Phase I. buildings. As you are aware there has been some confusion . . regarding the use of the buildings due to•the fact that the site plans submitted for Phase II identified uses based on potential worst case parking scenarios. As we stated in your office Friday, October 30, 1987, for the purpose of establishing average weekday vehicle trip ends per 1,000 gross square feet of building area, we believe the characteristics of the uses of these buildings most closely relate to the description of industrial park as outlined in the ITE manual . According to the ITE ' '' definition,' industrial parks are characterized by a mixture of uses with a number of • . small and medium size businesses. The attached drawing, Exhibit A, illustrates the current signed leases for both Phase I and Phase II. Extrapolated at the current rate, Phase I would have 12 to 14 tenants and Phase II . (Building C) 10 to 12 tenants. The Phase I buildings are designed with a total of ' 22 separate entrances and Phase II is designed with 10 entrances. The current four. tenants occupy a total of 41,200 square feet and have 72 permanent on site employees for an average of one employee per 572 square feet of gross building area which is in line. with the ITE average of one employee for each 510 square feet for industrial parks. We believe this information confirms our belief that the. operation of these tenants _most. flearly is representative of the function of an industrial . park. If the four j1\\ ' actual tenant improvement floor plans are analyzed and categorized in the following use categories: office, storage, • general light manufacturing and miscellaneous , (entries, restrooms and rooms such as conference rooms not continuously occupied) the dA breakdown would be as follows: S : '7(04'( ie ''&&) 11, v15-9 uvckbl ,) I� . -1e34-4l 30111, .1t /i i 1 . 'I 1 1 1.I - - - rr, -,------ F 1,--1 1 . IH IT- z-) L-.L lj \/ LL---f. r[-\ City of Renton - Traffic Division 1 Attention: Gary Norris 3 Ce,i Project Number: 387511 .., ik November 2, 1987 L'OjLr,,i '",; / 7.er'dNi.1 Dr:Pf. Page Number 2 Average Weekday Square feet ITE Trip Rate Vehicle Trip Ends OFFICE 14,958 17.7 265.5 GENERAL LIGHT MANUFACTURING 12,868 5.46 70.98 STORAGE 8,228 4.88 39.04 MISCELLANEOUS 52 146 4.88* 24.40 -..---- TOTAL 41,200 399.92 399.92/41.2 = 9.7 (average weekday trip ends per 1,000 square feet) _ *Estimated Trip Rate Computed Using Industrial Park Rate 41,200 square feet 41.2 X 7 trips 288.4 We thank you for your time and consideration and look forward to meeting with you at 8:00 a.m. Tuesday, November 3, 1987 to review in more detail this project and answer any questions you might have. Sincerely, . 7 \aia4A-11A; . .141,cin .. Lynn Takeuchi Architect HLT:lr Attachment .._ . .. .. .4 I I ,, • ), .- . III '' '-.. 8 I r• .- -t 4 • , i\ I i V .. Cq 'f-7 • i • ii II . . . . , . . .. , . S.W. 41st STREET '• / DEN, . . . .._....._. .... .- •- _.. . .... . - • ------ - -. EXISTINO SIDEWALK TO in REMOVED / • . ,,.. • NI 88°36'37''W '''', L 515.11'.. :: -- • -----4- ''\ " •/ R:55-00. r ....... .-- i • A:90 18'38'..;>'"-:--' ,4'ed•— • . ----20.00.EA;SAIENT ' . ' 810HAOE LOCATION ,. 20.•20.EASEMENT. I 1,:JIITI [111111LIT;'.1.111M—it, _ L:86.69 - P 11 1 1 i 1 I I._ F li ;Nt.; 0 L (NO./...,......,E.-I••?',•,,2,..,..0. 4.' . I . —i - i-f1) 1 1 Fl 1 ....... ,,,.,,I,f,„, ,..I.,.., .,,„,i 1 1 .1 ..„„.0....„...,„„„ ,t..,2 1,...,4 ,,,„\,.,„.„....1.7 .17,c.,. 1 10 v?' .. , I " '...ov ."e,•e• u ., V,.., 100 V.••/.....r.?i-:-.,.•e.;,•;__.,.•0.,,,I.,n!sl.-.T2,-•-•',. . . - t(.41•17, -;:;', .t 1.""'- 2Z''.1•;.-;4 tl-t-t-— t •'.-- . t t _. l• _,JT.1-'•1•, • i ,_.„. I f 0-... 1 f . I I Licf ---[ ..,J,f \-./,.,s. _LIE ,, _ , I 1,7,9 ..„,. c-- . . . a -.3 . 4iY-o' 140.-0' • ---- —L.-•iN' • im • ! ..- il --‘," '-i i'... •‘'s..‘ 1 ''' '7.1.1 ,....' ,..........; . , -- ,34.-7..pi\ A A\ • ;., .h ., ._ . •• . ui 1 ..- .C" :4•3' . : : • ' 1 y •-• ,., , . • 'BUILDING \\ X 11 • BUILDING 1 .16 : 4, .? co .• - '..,N .„ . • A \.\ , : • B A\ z ? ••• a •N zs g ,, -i \\\` , ,,,.,i , Ii• 6 •',- 1. 9 .` * .9 I li •6 6 ' A\ _24:r T• . \‘'‘,:• I \ 1 '11.7''. r-ZL. z •_,' 'r tr -...4 ° 1 — • • T. . ______... _ ._.._ 3 isH,... . ="111?,.._ /),,1 . r" _ . t, . . .... . . . r Mc S . . \ 26' 743 b., • ---- • • 1, k 11 II .III I 1 20 . :._ 1 1 .. . ... • •.•.. . . . .. . . . . •- - 3 ' s - 0 ••. , , 4.,, J l' . .,,,. ,, N'../ .-- 'S • !?./IINiled 11,S; I, ....)./1•••...•11).;_H..0. 13 , 9 ( / .9 \ • . , • u -I-7.:: ' :A LO a •3 1 2 '1, ---- '' ° • _. r. \ \ 'i 'IVI1 . "i.i'-,i-_61 ti -0 iiI•d Ilti;44:4,• T,.. lc, , ,_``.._!. 1' _‘• .1cl''e .,-r-.-. I • - - I _ • '.') vic _ _. 91. \1 . . e . , .....--- 4, .... . --4... '4- — - . ' ••• • -... Zt 0. U -.0 — ..7' '-ii-ij l• - . . • / I DW 1 ---- / . al , . " N\ 7 ,,--t .L__-iT--,_=_,-- ,, A- -- . . ., .,, .,, , \\ 0 g ' ' ., NI .--7.:----7 • u it\c:_-_-:-.. •t,, "\\•, u 0 1, __ ..-. d ' ( . . CC I• 2Fir 1S 20' 10 •.\\ :\ . ' 14.5'1_01_4-Z 28' -010 18'0'r.28' .,_1_0:ta,p.' A __ , _ . ----.. I C.1 / I - •.:'. • • -• ... • ,, _or _.. , • 0 o • Z •.. NE 11:3• 11 I I P cIl cIi ct 31.I . . , w WA I ,•, -- . .„ s• ,1 a— EISSI•sr•cr.4,all-57'...o-' ,:zrY•o"Igo' ter& of?„!_4?„,,,g..„.Q f47,10__Ttp• ,,,er)-cil-4,4 ,__,r__, . 4,A,i;j:E;:ls, 4.4,v.,ii}"?Vhcr4-4.._a_Es!-(..•!, ri.!.c4. vi u4 t,t aq.......-4..11:k_dijc?4 ,-I Ltw.'7,1- wv-Pi 1,Lik...:0 f 1' ___...?. .. .21 —tit dultitlultitidulu AC -.-41) 7 4-fg`lcic_icklAd.`.1`1./c1+ i -1 C— ___ _ _ . _ . .. . _ , _ . • ---- -t ,----- 0 ii . 1—..r. • . I Hill1101 _ ., . ... .. ... . .. .. .. . _ , .., I . _o_ _... d,,. 0 ii le ) ."'r. B•in lii 7 -k 1 - --• — -. — • ---- "....: ILI _ 7 .-- r ;Ii.E1-7,0LeP •37',Td ,d:f ' cep.51-,ar,ail iie-o° t z-I•ril .,1-r", -7,7!.,00 .• ,IZ.!‘? ,r,..ria • _.. M. _ > .O b^ ' •. A _... 6, : 211ILIJI111111 -..• 0" .2 (ti ••— .;i• _....._ ........• ••• 01.111:0114 ' .; ..,:—.. . -di . .. .. .. tr .\ . \ •. S _._ '...‘,N\ \ • \ -4 ' \''' \ \ \\\ . f! • _F.. . .... st -.1,;- ‘, \ N''';'.\\ ,\ \\\.- \\‘' N'.'2.\.\\''. \- •',\ -. . _t'__..._ \N\.,...'\'''''' ' '\ ''' \\\ ‘`s\•.; . ,•I 1"S:: \•_.\\ • \ • • , X-..--T'•-• -•-•"-T''.•• s'T.•' ‘‘.. .." •\‘`,..:. .,\ ••• . \..-"K,,,:,\-\\.-:•:•,•.;`. ''- —• -- • •• •• r--r-3. , •-• • '':', '!",:- - .- ' ,"' 1) •- • - \••‘'.... -\"‘'' :`‘L,'N,: , - , , . -SI _._,:: .) _ . I ----- '4 - I I 0---n_j ( I I t: Ic--., (T( 5!. =._:1),._,II .L•1" be.c.,'____ __ ,__ 12.71-ei 0.00..d I • le.•'•(3' ___ uLTI,EL.2.1„)_z_q-g_.1,_44 -- ,I Alec;t 10 o.e-0T,eril- '-di ,d_11 5,1.4 dycz'' °c-r -1: i.. lS .1,7r (3 01•6) 1701-€1 4.14 (1'-:41g 3 1_4.69i.1..1 .1 I I I LI I I _9 I I I I 1111_ cicicickickktc . c citlicic Hit II 1 --, . .. .„, Al -• 17-PIC A: N I 4o'45'E 0 N acr 3e'37'E N se 35'37'E . •....-- -_ _____......_____________ . ___L I. ... - __.. — — ( 1 1 . . . . 0. SITE.LAYOUT PLAN . EXHIBIT 'A' SCALE: 1':30' . , ..., . Imrlimml • 1 lea' • • . . . North . • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-071-87 , APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-079-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for Site Approval of a 54,250 sq. ft. building to be used for general office/warehouse on a 190,425 sq. ft. site. PROPONENT: Mackenzie/Saito & Associates, P.S. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on Lot 8 of the Koll Business Center/Renton at the S.E. Corner of Lind Ave. and S .W. 41st. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority` of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from November 9, 1987. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , November 24, 1987, in order to be considered. A �. fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: October 28, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: November 9, 1987 )1( Ronald G. Nelson a . Sprin r Building and Zoning Director Polic evelop nt Director Richard C Houghton Public Wo s Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: South Lind Square Phase II. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-071-87 APPLICATION NO. : SA-079-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for Site Approval of a 54,250 sq. ft. building to be used for general office/warehouse on a 190,425 sq. ft. site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on Lot 8 of the Koll Business Center/Renton at the S.E. Corner of Lind Ave. and S.W. 41st. CONDITIONS: That the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant mitigate the anticipated traffic impacts of this development by providing a traffic mitigation fee of $156,463 . NOTE: This fee is based upon a breakdown of the project into 75 percent office use at 17.7 AWVT per 1, 000 s. f.and 25 percent light industrial at 5.43 AWVT per 1, 000 s. f. 2 . That the applicant provide passive recreation opportunities on site. 3 . That the applicant participate in providing off-site recreational opportunities in the Valley either through a financial contribution or by developing or assisting in the development of a project as identified in the master recreation plan for the Valley. 4 . That the southerly entrance off Lind Avenue S.W. be 15 feet from curb to property-line, for a total 30-foot drive-way when the property to the south develops. ~-O. CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Sliinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director November 6, 1987 Spieker Partners 11400 S.E. 8th Bellevue, Washington 98004 Dear Sir: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance (Mitigated) for Mackenzie/Saito & Asssociates, File No. ECF-071-87, SA-079-87. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:cs 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ChSin rt h9 DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 21, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 2, 1987 EFC - 071 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-079-87 PROPONENT: MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P-.S. PROJECT TITLE: SOUTH LIND SQUARE PHASE II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 54,250 SQ. FT BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 ACRES IN KOLL BUSINESS CENTER. LOCATION: S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st SITE AREA: 4.37 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth ✓ 2) Air '/ 3) Water `/ 4) Plants ✓ 5) Animals ✓ 6) Energy and Natural Resources ✓ 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use t./ 9) Housing ✓ k. 10) Aesthetics ►/- 11) Light and Glare ✓ 12) Recreation L✓ • 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation ` ' 15) Public Services lam' 16) Utilities ✓ COMMENTS: • - ,,,V gi We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or. areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. _--/-7 -_.,, Signature of irector`or_uthorized Representative Date /D/0/6) 7 Form 4 REN IN BUILDING & ZONING DEF ITMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-079-87 PROPONENT : MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES. P.S. PROJECT TITLE : SOUTH LIND SOUARE PHASE II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A RTTF APPROVAT. Tn CENGPRTTCP A S4 ?cn SO. FT. BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 2.CEL IN tKOTT BUSINESS ENTE LOCATION : S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st TO : fl PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION ITTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : Eli UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT fl .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT DPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON nrmnBRR z, T QR7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : OAPPROVED [1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ENOT APPROVED p , Z) i-'`( �'"��.Z,_ c_ ',.c,.4=0., �,�j(` '"_A !d DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 ? ) 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ( W,i• n 7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I Ya, 'c1 DATE.CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 21, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 2, 1987 EFC - 071 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-079-87 PROPONENT: MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P-.S. PROJECT TITLE: SOUTH LIND SQUARE PHASE II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 54,250 SQ. FT BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 ACRES IN KOLL BUSINESS CENTER. LOCATION: S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st SITE AREA: 4.37 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth !�J_ 2) Air t— 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals G� 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health I 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics • 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation • 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation L---- 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • l o rt R. D tzt: 1 Cr ss ��-- b1 F-1 cis 40) L SS SQF(;/oo0 X I -7. 1 1` 7 = 1. LI I) 8ZS V/Az� Houk o 1 7 S'? °14 o X �'• �� 1 cl 7 - 7 57-oltiy46C_ 5 y 5SQ�/o9n X g9X 197 5�2 r • 0 TTA L ktikou14T .;' 4 Si-{ 9 I / /74 " cL-L-Y-!� a Pi 0 c�v-iUeI.J�O. 1-6 l ��' 3b �i(ol d p • 7 71-6 /2-P 1ilia: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas w have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wherge additional information is needed to pro erly assess this proposal. ,p7 Signature of Director or Au orized Representative Date J Form 4 REF )N BUILDING & ZONING DE RTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-079-87 PROPONENT : MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. PROJECT TITLE : SOUTH LIND SQUARE PHASE II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A SITE APPROVAT: Tn rnNSTRTTCT A a 7n SO. FT. BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 ACRES ,IN KOLL BUSINESS CENTER_ LOCATION : S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ri ENGINEERING DIVISION / TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU LI PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT fl .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT ri POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ri OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON nrTnRPR 1, 1 Q9 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7 I9 Plc EK) G1 E P 1 N G APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED/5 74l—- A1 "Fy o 1-,.l ,�, I �-;D J'�je r��J f 47) /i s `2- La r 7'-��a f � �'c) 1;drove v /J 1 � a ' ��- �.51- Oases& r ' � rn P 17- I c_ 1 z) 0)6 U P SAA-,/, %{ 7 _5 57 _� (P -1 ) 1 .. `1 ' /e 4 ( j 15 7 — ( 7, 3 ) 9: _sir° gpi / \-Yip L .5 7 — (j.r&9,9)3) DATE: 6 _;/, /// / % L SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORI ED REPRESENT TIVE o / REVISION 5/1982 Form 1A2 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEN 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 011 - APPLICATION NO(S) : 5 O-11 -- '67 PROPONENT : M AC.K _1E / A1To A-6,16G, f TES ) 1' S. PROJECT TITLE : 30uT+H L UP E P 4-'SEA .� BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A PLi C._Krtoft Fa I_ A S PPkrl l.- -TO Ca M 5°i Roc T A .54 1250 Sq., FT 1301 LD t Tb & iSED AS A t4 o t F I c C= / 6'1© ems a 4 cj . 37 I+c,>t!,` s 1 ei 1'.8 i 3ugt rues catati LOCATION : S E iA a r L 1 1 k D J4i1 _ 51.0 S W 4t 5•� 5 r, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT C/�� ! ? 9;7 ❑ ENGINEERING DIVISION 1:st TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION ❑ UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION ! • Gp e S ei/ FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 1=1 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT (. 7,f/4/4.-44‘,1/11-4 Li BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ❑ POLICE DEPARTMENT / .0ei. , ❑ POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - _ El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M, ON b ct. 2 1 1q "7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : -I-R,AF IC E GINEE \ NG LIAPPROVED DAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS flNOT APPROVED A) M o s-f-- e r I e vz 1-1r a-vtc.e., a c i L t- l I v e S LJ -- (5 1—. y 0lie rl C IPr.p..,1-1 i I L 1^t`C' 4 r `ZL. to-F Y3 I d c 3O OFPIC. .40 s SQ °{, XI7LZ Xj 7 = Y1I91) S75 13, 6 2 46 AssEssmENT ���• ;G�l DATE: J614 fil SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZ D REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 . ikiA 1162314V_A__ C. ---a ----- 2 i; j/�� L � 6 0Q/ is'44t ! F. TcO• /7. 7 rli0. 21 /� - ( P" s7 14040,py gist, /.3..V x 5,0- rs o¢ 7q1 r T b%;i /11;0 . .75 % se �;: off01g. __. le ie 7tryie jl t . 1 i i _._ ___ 7 . Z/3 _._.._ D f SOUTH LIND SQUARE, PHASE II. SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-079-87 1. LANDSCAPING: • 1. The London Plane trees along Lind Avenue. should be substituted with .a less agressive type canopy tree, ie: Red Maple, and maintain the minimum 2-22 inch caliper size. Berm front planter also. 2. Two percent of the site needs to be landscaped for wildlife habitat per zoning code, section 4-744 (F.) (2) . This requirement needs to- be-show on the landscape plans with • plant materials which would be .suitable for feeding and nesting of the birds and small mammals. 3. Additional coniferous, trees would be desirable around the perimeter of the complex for seasonal color. 2. TREATMENT OF BUILDING/SITE LAYOUT: 1. The revised site plan submitted relocated the main entry into the building from the north alcove to the west side along Lind . • Avenue; The entry- ways located along this side of the building are not well delinated. The walkways lead to the edge of X parking stalls. Pedestrian circulation there as elsewhere on the site is poor and should be improved' to provide more definitive walkways • around the site and to Lind Avenue. 2. The architecture on the facade of the building is not very inter- • • esting and although it should match the earlier phase to .the north as proposed, special treatment should be done around the e try • ways. of the bui fling architecturally to set those area aide and make them more inviting. /0/0 E, 3. Dumpsters are not shown on the site plan. They will need .to be screened with fencing and/or landscaping. 3. RECREATION: 1. The applicant has stated in the Environmental Checklist that no recreational opportunities will be provided by the applicant on the subject. site and the project narrative gave no information in regard. to this. Passiye on-site recreation should be provided for the estimated 100-125 employees of this phase. While raised planters .4) will provide some seating in the alcove spaces along the north side , , of the building, that area is limited. The revised site plan has even reduced those areas. The applicant has stated that there are an estimated 11 extra parking stalls. This would equate to an area of 1,980 square feet of space that could be incorporated into plaza space. The applicant should be required to provide additional seating space outdoors and include some tables for the employees/visitors. • RECREATION-cont. • 2. Interior space off the court yards could also be utilized as an employee lounge/lunchroom during the rainy and cooler times of year. 3. For more active recreation, a basketball hoop could be placed in a parking/loading area if safely designed away from traffic. 4. The project should include some-bicycle racks for bike parking. • Jerry Lind October 29, 1987 ERC/Dskl AG102187 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA OCTOBER 21, 1987 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10: 00 a.m. PENDING PROJECTS: ECF-067-87 'CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (OAKESDALE SM-011-87 AVENUE ARTERIAL CONNECTION) Application for substantial shorelines development permit to allow the construction of 780 lineal feet of Oakesdale Avenue, construction of a new P- 1 channel and realignment of Springbrook Creek into the P-1 channel, and I-405 high occupancy vehicle lane widening. Property located in the vicinity of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. between S.W. 16th Street and S.W. Grady Way. New application to be submitted by Public Works. ECF-064-87 LEWIS AND CLARK FINANCIAL CORPORATION (RENTON CU-074-87 PLAZA II) Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a six-story office building having 32, 000 sq. ft. of office space and 55, 664 sq. ft. of covered parking space, and to allow up to 25% of the adjoining greenbelt to be used for parking to support the office building. Project located north of South Puget Drive, west of Benson Road South and east of Talbot Road S. Deferred pending additional information. CONTINUED PROJECTS: ECF-071-87 MACKENZIE/SAITO AND ASSOCIATES SA-079-87 (SOUTH LIND SQUARE PHASE II) Application for site approval to construct a 54,250 sq. ft. building on a 190,425 sq. ft. site to be used as general/warehouse. Property located S.E. corner of Lind Ave., S.W. and S.W. 41st. NEW PROJECTS: A.L. SLEISTER AND SONS (UNOCAL STATION TANK REPLACEMENT) The applicant will remove two 10,000 and two 550 gallon underground metal gasoline tanks and will replace them with two 12,000 gallon fiberglass tanks and two 550 gallon tanks. Site is located at 3933 N.E. 4th Street. CORRESPONDENCE: Letter from Ramac, Inc. , Re: Park Place Site Plan , ECF-049-87. g i • - MACKENZIE/SAITu & ASSOCIATES, P.S. ,Iru_La CIF 71 n,RIM[ U -, IL 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3, SUITE 233 c /\ O-7�1 j]_`�C�.f • BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206) 451-1005 Date: October 14, 1987 Project Number 387511 To: City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Attention: Jerry Lind Project Name: South Lind Square Phase II Please find attached: shop drawings -plans -samples specifications copy of letter change order details calculations Number of copies: Description: 2 Sheet SD-1 Site Plan dated 10/12/87 X For your use For your review - For approval As requested REMARKS: Copy to: Signed: Paul Fngert/mo Mailed X Delivered C7.- p CIF RaNTCN EL -To be picked up ��' E 1 / n� SUlLL: ,t,.; a Ra a E r. If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. YLJLL° J BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT October 7, 1987 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Mackenzie/Saito & Associates, P.S. PROJECT: South Lind Square Phase II. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-071-87 APPLICATION NO. : SA-079-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for Site Approval of a 54, 250 sq. ft. building to be used for general office/warehouse on a 190, 425 sq. ft. site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on Lot 8 of the Koll Business Center/Renton at the S.E. Corner of Lind Ave. and S.W. 41st. B. ISSUES: 1. Traffic: The City of Renton through its consultant CH2M Hill has identified various traffic improvement projects necessary to allow the traffic to move through the valley at an acceptable rate. Developers in the Valley are participating tin the construction of these improvements through financial contribution or the actual construction of an improvement or some contribution to the two. The applicant's project will will generate approximately 952 trips . These trips occur during the rush hour. Therefore, in order to alleviate congestion of the traffic network , the applicant must participate- in the traffic mitigation program. 2 . Recreation: The project will employ 100 to 125 people. Sufficient outdoor passive recreation needs to be provided for the employees. While the applicant has provided planters with seating, an area should be provided which has tables. The applicant is not providing any active recreation opportunities. At a minimum, consideration should be given to providing some opportunity for active recreation on site, such as a half basketball court. In addition, the applicant should make some contribution to the valley trail system and recreation projects in the valley, since employees of this project will have the opportunity to use these facilities. BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEV 3MMITTEE STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 7, L987 , SOUTH LIND SQUARE PHASE II PAGE 2 C: RECOMMENDATIONS: That the applicant be give a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant participate in the Valley transportation mitigation program by providing 2 . That the applicant pp provide passive recreation opportunities on site. 3 . That the applicant participate in providing off-site recreational opportunities in the Valley either through a financial contribution or by developing or assisting in the development of a project as identified in the master recreation plan for the Valley. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Fire Prevention Bureau: Probable minor impact noted for public services with no further comment. Design Engineering: Traffic Engineering: Utility Engineering: Probable minor impacts noted for Public Services and Utilities with no further . comment. Parks and Recreation: More information requested on Transportation. Probable major impact on Aesthetics and Recreation. The following comments were made: 1. PLANTING MATERIALS: Applicant should consider an alternative to the London' Plane trees because of maintenance problems as the trees mature. 2 . DESIGN: The landscaping fails to create people places on the site. It works primarily as a decorative element that meets a legitimate aesthetic need, but it should also meet the on-site functional need of passive and mildly active recreation spaces. 3 . On-site parking requirements have been exceeded by eleven (11) stalls and compact car stalls comprise only 31% of the total. 4. A site of this size with over a hundred employees needs usable open space which would be possible with a reduction in the number and size of parking stalls. BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIETA )MMITTEE STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 7, L987 SOUTH LIND SQUARE PHASE II PAGE 3 5. Bicycle parking needs to be provided close to the building entrance. 6. Off-site recreation impacts could be mitigated by contributions to valley recreation development projects which include trails and a centrally located park. 7. Pedestrian access to the site needs to be planned for and clearly illustrated. Building Division: Probable minor impacts noted for Earth, Housing, and Aesthetics with no further comment. Zoning Division: The following comments were made: 1. Should site recreational amenities be provided on the site for employees? 2 . Suggest outside area be set aside for 9, tables and benches for employee lunch area. (Alcove areas by entry ways really don't serve this except as seating on planters. ) 3 . The applicant will need to be required to participate in the Valley Traffic Mitigation program. Policy Development: Mon.; information requested on Plants, Animals, Land use, Aesthetics, Recreation and Transportation. Probable minor impacts noted for all - other environmental elements. The following comments were made: • 1. The SCS mitigation program requires a 2% of the total area to be retained in a landscaping acceptable for wildlife habitat, in addition to the landscaping required by city code. It does not appear that this requirement has been met. 2. Are the landscaping and setbacks required by M.P. zoning met by the proposed site plan? 3 . The majority of this site is designated commercial on the comp plan, and a need has been identified for commercial development in the valley. This proposal is inconsistent with this identified need. 4 . On site active and passive recreational opportunities should be provided. A linkage to the proposed trail system along Springbrook Creek should also be provided. 5. Will the applicant participate in the valley transportation mitigation program? BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIETI JMMITTEE STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 7, L987 SOUTH LIND SQUARE PHASE II PAGE 4 6. The structure should be integrated with buildings A and B. Pedestrian linkages between the structures should be provided. OW A oii;•J rit ,, l--A - -t�als'pi?y%K. `•:,�r• rrit,, _as �:l :I.V�f.�Y. n • • �',4thA fA I 5'! !. ,ya' Ir - -y BUILDING BUILDING i Hi NU i2 wOih .. - �S✓'r f .:r ^i'I \ ( ) ( a.uw ery • Il - 4 r �ni^':•q - , ^ '' nyd>eb'm'dl y1?-i�c a e-� n�'.o' aJ-d - .00•rn:Y�oco�¢��Tn'-d / • ,� A id, eta 043 YXea i HO ^�91 EJ4 bl r.,'.'f ~W is-; I ydt f :s:d• t{}ad`So r / 4,,,f t a r-4 "J -- :n:F ti• _ 1.,'.';'• ^pC..h:i�.al 'L °/'�- / ^1 Ic14 y: IY `ti..t;s:3T`-'^i: ''r:. .C� `'•ir' _ • ''if:'��.• - I ��T—i / / S� / �,IN \ C . o et`r i4..,•t .�.�J�—_— _� / d '�d d.o'--' T O od, I' :��' `.' =' I ( -A1 `- 1 ,1 III ,,, uxD sauAR2 o W a I tlI '`li a 1 Y I 2 O w I / s o.� v%'J I I I w ir,.. •A FM w 1 ::a^ a — - 1 •r >I d o a� gx.� a i 1 • - •�l i:Y:R� �'�`i :'r'.�; , v'I - ..{r ,Tr;ia•. 9 1 � I ro � - - -<r': .• n — P I I I I I I — �" 0� VICINITY MAP . r ®D xD aDA E BUILDING II al }_E � _r�l '.i'ry'4:�'��:i':::',� �r 'J-.; �� ee ffffff m_1 / I - to r D I / v , 14 i I �^ I ro �!F� I S - 1 Iv D s\ ❑❑- :--/H,I,1:',:T1:--:Lla.Ii'-'--f- 1 d / ,' ;'; s ! — 4I . 0 _ - .:%'_ - _ - '�— ys.ceo t4 xKc.o �•t e.'d ler'1 . } in.,.. . ,,„ a l SOUTH - I I cic Icicicl cl cic _1P IelAlelA I Icic Ic IIII� I n I LIND..:....•; 'I�� � /� S UA 8 IQ�I � I� I IG , 1 m - 1 x ea• far•E - / 1 - - L . ...•• ....,_,•• ar • f�� LA:OUT .��j"•. P9 Y ''eey PLAN S* } n,l'• _ e� acne t•.30. �`..„ . .__ " __ d.o• ems° (Ye°• W • " -;'z;Yti .o .,i - .. North _ ")y�. y4 :l•- 2. `.I:C'?��,';_''•;• SEPT' .t. OST r :J,1;` SITE STATISTICS: PQ LOCATION MAP x,° t cy.a,-,:,it D 6C.LE ®® TOTAL SITE AREA: p0,620 SO.FT. PARKING PROVIDED: .i:.:�^ '.:hr.R:J.'^::`' - ''�-.r:•-. tram ! SUILDINO FODTPRINT: :=;5;28°:: S0.FT. STANDARD f � :j":. • SITE COVERAGE: 20.61COtJPACT 'c-mas� - 't _ - • LANDSCAPED AREA: 60.Fi. M.C. SA 'P.�•-'.v:;'' 'v •S.•- - .� •iPARKNG MAKEUYERINO60.FT. TOTAL 3 ^.'(:;.< - _Y L -2 t" ,'-' :�,,� _ '`'.� DuaowG AREA: eun.mnD occuoa;Jcr: la-2 'x'4'.•' ''''�.'.: - OFFICE eO,eSD 60.FT. COtJ4TRUCTION TYPE: V-N • ..'�f'Y.. ` i�Yt -^ -' '"d '`'{�` REHOUSE S,t2T S0.FT. 6PRIMKLERED: YES '•l�,`��SP Tv_1 - _ ''+•• ' - GTORAOE fi,A266D.FT. 20RIt1G: YP 347511 ^^` SD-1 TOTAL fit,26060.FT. FIRE 2ONE: __ t'�j r`4y1'••�J 4• 'L'�y.,,"• - TS TS PARKING RESUMED: _ fir, ,1„ BF OFFICE 203 ,' +,�I - }":' WAREHOUSE 8 DO DO STORAGE r SD.1 - r • '$ GO TOTAL 21S • 1, ... ..,-,,'X-J a -,..•t_.,. F if °Ir,• :-z'"rl C! p im. . '� e-`a•f 4 ' •'I •-'h ,a�.!'ii�,•e- �i�, �'>��t• • y • r •• 1-s • e' y ' ai`naF' : i, ;�` - 1• • T ':c• r r;Ni. sut�oarao cu:LGIiVO NU+>. l ( o :::: a l .re ri •aras•n•rr ya`},"• �.'.•i, �za/ n c r- wr' us>f•>,ccs, - �•J"I/ __ •+J-, - - 1'1.; -.0 .a+-n __ IT-d -af i.aa• a� n-d :d I I. ..- %4't {� I 74,; rt• I n I ]y Q c,c 'r; W cc ca °� i1e'0 etc I° It 1 1 _I� vN • , o a •l In. O9 a as n'-d d.d t ,r•d O : ._?'.• so'Y n o -.dd — it N=E L t: P'J M.KtT/1 r l^ _ - •t" t 7 I I I i¢` - r L011T B0U1t0 O IB t O n . I n s J N o 6 i Y I M� CI r I.' .Il 'o DI, / J S 6a 45 r 4,i ]s� S P i I V lY� T a.I;:�}. i I� 1• I I I I I am I I I r rya� rr _ _ J s:' /:P 3 Itco ' .d a� -/..'H a9' 17'-0' T T.'R 'ti o' O -t • '•1 l ,f"'%'•�:; 7 VICINITY MAP 0 20 - _ _ I 0 a cD acAai . '1 •6 �s1 AA � q. ®®V 0 0 A. - • '•!. _ - J i 0 i . .n --it C . C • v i MVP - - -•L A. 1a° gy -t t �. ,A «7 d�7�1 .d C J 'd b:I�'` - d-d r 'd i - � l�r Re 'd 1 a - l.. } �'R � 51� 6 _ '.z-'. `n'. I dlw•s...er•.t-,a'.-' ,. .-..: .�.d •srnrr..r;.G:. m-e._ + i PI<I< i ,I fn 'c I,l o .LIIdo I R O C�°. lJc >_t) ) U ;w ok . • yy • :lo. c srZt / . F% ~ Pt PT A>L4S-ACERFU t-ta LOao+lR>dE0 ATSC APE PLAN 0 : Pule:a .a< a _ `"!M- ':;,7> _ j; .¢ a¢ e' ?�:.G:.�' • North ® F .. "1a LEER Pa...R-v T..P.4Esc .l,-. L-o' -f'. •-.7t'' 1F..:,', O ?,a„ .l.Lv. •c,-sra....l P.A.` L-. „1%}.i:.. - - 'S, • r'l,'• O D,ces P..dL AS, G..,ace .3...E gawLE c--.- 'LEFT.I. inT` ! ` i12' • SITE STATISTICS: L•�U.9.M4ER ,,.; LOCATION MAP 1 -4.. .',.:• �.�i'•-. - `. _ S'Y21G—lU _ S,.IVT:...u- v_ co e...w .P?H _ etl , i' I P-9li e•IS 4a gcq./rrs.E ®® : v _ -- Y- L-�- ....'�!..fn.;' .. ,'.•`'+'-,.,_ ,:,,'..' r':..`v ,'•.,•,�_'a`�• TOTAL SITE AR,,E 1BOA3000.R. PARKIN.PROVIO[.: :.1,.. D d.•la,.t. Jc`s 't:c.Jedly q>Mmo LT .�, i:i l" _ - _ ' Ci•-.,;:;`::'� �i, 6UILDIRO FOOTPRINT:_6•.3fA GO.FT. GTANOARD 1eS 6 ey S°'^- t tT \ a! .•J -,.1'..'..". SITE COVERAGE:_ 311.31 COMPACT G9 _ IrLUSD R•.^1 7.°°.�,LUM wad.}r.a.a Pn,'1 -�r_�'- _ L:aox.°.IL • - 4,¢ TAPodtCP 'P•�Rs s' �.la" ' ,:I"c •• ;I.X`• LANDSCAPED ARM 41.107 I Jt,•.•�' _ SO FT. N.C. 6 � c �'•J� !}V f. 0 6•IER GRe ES. A1A,.ER ?. l P...e.i U(t_ PARKING MANEUVERING:-00,0BB DO.PT. T 336 °-'=i-''� .~ - - • OPAL-t�1.:.:'' O Qv..000,,,1•SQo•t SP• BUILDING AREA: DUILOIN O OCCUPANCY: C-3 Z-1='---. -./a• -J•n.•� , 0 '0ew\u� Lnta5.0LERASuS t�.TO l)Ytcal 0Zp W./ta�l I_.URCI D.... „�r;�� :t�• OFFICE •0.000 ROM CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-0 O • 1 Ctt..n.E CYP.Rt1 'P. A....."1.J' E v..4,1 ••.+,a.....t '.•j":. _•.T' -; : :, 11ARCNOUCE S. LO.FT. tIR1NKLEREO: TEE 11,Gr.o t M9 ;,--- 1 • ._ • STORAGE OAtt CO.PT. LONIAG:__ _ et, 'ill° C-Rc.•.l 02,1E2..V:,Mt9C.ld'Cle f)„`,,.<.� „-a,,.. X�.y�•t,'ta 1.:1, ^�: R • TOTAL N.3t0 CO.FT. FIDE 20RE:. - O b W.Lc 41ty .S<.1.,- C.,nt - r....• ___ . • IARKIUONEOVINED: S°n �A..✓.l _ y��;,'; /!//L4' ,,�I \ .•: r' i; +k-•":\.''+•!',� - • WAREN0U20 0 • _Illh'II VI(Cli(TII sT;x.', vg- - ,"I`..1'j •.t.,.Y; _ 1 TOTAL II Si • ,I:I ,'k i, •ff_ • _ '' Is • r ' • u.o t0T01I ........_ • • • 0.0, . RI f co s.,z 111 s. : Pil 5 • II m ,& CD Mi 11 4 Cn () 11:111 54. WI o.) . 5 • 5' • z • . o . = IM = .. • I N 1 • : I . . L-II .... la • . ..: ,..,.: ....,... [1: :... -.1 4 ,L9111 , ---1 .. , ;go MI H IN 1 ' il • i ; II ' II 'Ill. • 111 * .1 in 2 . :BM :11111 1:1= AMI aAm .. 0..1 lall ia wm co a sm . II • m - i (T, el < [xi I NM • • I • , . • al il II P I • 1 a • - E 1 3 I IT, . 1 . l 1 . III 1111 . .. 1.1 i , •11 I . -i. .., _ . , • . • .11 . . I . • • . ,,, i i . . II, . , . • 1 • • • . = 1 1.1 =I 11:ii . • ii PH 12.•- - II . . . . • • SOUTH LIND SOUNIE g g IT% i 1 I e ELEVATIONS PHASE II RENTON,WASHINGTON d M !iql FOR ...........8,M;t 1/4C.:;.!..71.NC.a.,,,.......3„.,ZIA1,_..sETE,..11,....„.SALT.s0. 1—___—__ il$, ?. p - BUILDING SECTION SPIEKER PARTNERS .-' ....",.. Q l!, 'IL • ..._ ..,.. ._.,--.,..-;.-.....:,,,,::7-. ..7••-•..:-,•--.-...--',.:,2i.-‘-',.•-fil.••••;,;..,•••-....,,,:,-;•,',:':-.•-)•::--...:-:••,,,,.:•••.,-.--...--..-• •Yr.;••••?7,!;:,..,•;•.i.:'•-, ,- ";.r.. ' ' 'i' '?:,';:C;.-;:".'"1.:';.`,::Pl,_,e,S:,',...7:1;•:4':.:;,:kg-1,..,':,,,.:,'Zi;.7i Vg.;-,':,..;,...i.: r,,L,,' ',.,,,,;..1,',X.i:',4....-.+:,..:ri,V '.',:nA::,‘,,,....,..1::....7,,,;;V,,i.;":;,..,,,,..,:::, -;,,,..1,24_,W,!ri•ft;,ii':..i.',.,:!1'.:=;.5,'.'",,4 '..i'''..!..,...4•t:',',.. ,,' ,•1":',.f.,::.• •,...4- *;•:,•--,,,,7,:•:,.,.•.,,i,,,,,,,-:?,..1-•,:‘,.,-=r:i,,,,. •!s,':,.:-•,---?-_,-..--,..=,0,--,..::,,,-.::•-.=•t:: ...:,;,..-.,:-A•:.,. ,- :•'"-? - ••.....':;.•,..--:-,., .„...--•,-; .-1.....,-. 2.••• •••;.!'.......-•.:-...,r::.,_:,---:-!:,,',,,-•,:.,;..:•.•:':-..:,•:..• -.-.-....::. .-.... . , ... .%-...,-;.:.,-3,-:-‘,...,.,,,•::.:,:,,,,,----=1,,••:,' ' --..::f...-.9'7•,.::;•,.'•:,''•_,.....,,,,•::.-°••,,..;..i,..-:.•:":,,:.•-•..,.. ,...-....,-,...,:„.7•,..‘T1,;,...:,'''.',.:: .-....,.;!'.::',-,'. ...-,',,,,-;,• i I ::::•',''. ,..11":7.-ri:..V:f' '!..'?,'.',.:'.!: 3‘:•:::,,r:/!. r..: ':.,..•':*::r:..S,5:-.f.-,'...:,;-. ..._:-::.-.1 !"...;;;--..,..:f:...f-•.:....•.,:::...,,;;"4.3-.,%C....-... .5:,:.-..-:;.-.:;:y.....-..........!...,...,:.1-,:',:;,.:.:',...-.:•,,,,::::..,;.::;!::`:,:',,)':....-;:::•,' ".:-y.;:-...,''''.'.•:'.'s'.C:':''...*"..'...,'.'-'..'. :,717::?Plf.,-;'",,;:*--I.::.,....1'.,,,-;:f.s:siz',!!:',';•..:;:..47;',i,„,,,!_,..-.°: -,''.'.V-".•,--.'.'.:!:. i=',.,`,.:'."',2-.•,':':-...,.%•-••,‘?:.-.,,:.-':!,,•-:'-:,.. :.:-..:,-. ';':-:-.::::•••,, r-,,;,:.--'-'.,..-:•....:::::-''':`''''':-:,:'•'.•.,• ".,:':. .--....,:';'''. '-:...r-:r.,:::-.:-::i''':.-.'::':',.: ..*.f.'''':'':.,. -''''.'::-..::7., ..-2-:.:.r. --;,-....:::":.. ....'•:.•:'..':.''';'.:1';..::-..'.':7::..:::::.-...'::::::1"....!:,.....''':7:: ::,-?.r.:!.;::---:: :'-:f-..:;;..,:•,:- ,"•-...--.;-•••-,.',.:.....:-.--- •.-,:.:.-!•'•:-.-.,‘•••••••..,..•::i.;.-..--•••,J.,.;,,:--.!.•.,:,,:!,......'.r,,•:.,,,•:•.,.-;:..: •:.....:::-.,,;:.: .:•••.:4.,..s..:..;..,,...,,-;::.'.."'-',',..„'...-..:..-...1.-;•-•.':-•.."-.,... --..:.:.. : :. - -.'- .-.,- . ....-,-..:,;...-..1..," :.-:::-,:....,,- ...r.:•!,P;.-:,.::.:,..2...!..,:f,-,,;,-;:.. .,,.:.; :....',e.,:;::•,•"'....,':,..-'-;:,'.-'...L.',':..,...:..,-:''..',::::,...Cr:';'-':! --,- ;::-:!,. .-.;:'-',:•,,:.:'-:''-''',..".""-'-::1•:'::-'1"-i l'':'.-:''''....:'''':-"':'''''':' 37''`'.'''' '''''''''';.---- ":'.-:-,...?:*±:.::--i:::-:?"...'''':','-':',"..:'--,:"`:-.:'-',..:•:.---.',.::..::%-`.''.:.' .-.;!.,,-....-..:-'..',i-,''......`.-..,,.':..1';'.:..'e-'-.1- -*,:•'.:'1:,,:',...,,---.,.-',-.....;-;-.--.*:,-.-....-N.'•':-''.;-.•-'.."•"7..'1..,7''''''''T.::''''',":2:::::':..:::-..:'-: ,.f,"Z.;.*:',';--..<:.f.,ri::::,:.:.......',...,'-',;=;.::-....-..-•r',..'...-,.:7.',!:::: .:.,,'''•,-.:-;:.;;...:. ,-;,•-•'.:-..,:t,,.77:".,:.:'-.1,-7-•,-,...-`•,`......."-;':'s.`i::...."::"--.:.:..--.74::.fi:';''.. -:-,,:.:".71,..1,'-',.•; :-:•:..;,s7.',--•.',.-:•:':-:-::,;-.Z.c.7,:,,.-::-.„::-::,:-..-,,,T..,::;:,.. ...,.,..-,;';'....:,s,j, .....,:-.1.:.;.:,.•:;:,..!;:.,....1....,:fi,-(....-7::,;;;_:-...,,',::-. ..:,.,;.. .,--„:i,!::,;:.-..z::::'.;,'I.:.-1,:••':';';--.;.;j:C.c., ,:=.,,...-•.-'.-,...-.--;:::::.-*--4--_-..,.....;..::::',...E.-...!;,:.:.:,'.,7-;,.:.:,,..,,..-,r.-.: :.';.'2•;'-!.':,..,-;--,..!:::::;:l'',:':::',.=.‘i7-.:-;':••,'...-,.;':.•'........t.frJ.- .:',•''." :;:.:•..::"--::'•"'•.'•:'..: :-... ":-..'".•.‘,.:.----•.-:'-:-I'''. ',..,•'.-. :-,'.''''':-:-.----,..,-,'.':',--Ci;•Y.1'.:*•''''''.:'-'-'-'ff'f-7:•:.:.:L•... "':'..''"''' -'.-:.,-.-..,,,,.7:.::.::.;.:-:;--....,*;=.;:::;;;;?.,.;';',..-.Y,•-:.:-=•'-',.-...•_ . .P•A.L:;•..,...'.";:.-•;,,.-..,;:.:-:'.e::-.1,';;:i;,.f.:-.r.--, ` !. ... .-..-,:. : '.;,l,--;:',.,..,...:_,..',...!=::::::-...•.,...'.,,:.;'.:.,j-:-.. ,`:;:•..=:,.. .':-.':7;-.1`::.;,--.:,.-::;.-;:-.--z'l&...e...7.]..,.. •'.•.,:,,::.:.:::::--,•.:f.,;-:'.../..-::.7,7;.;''''.;;''',',:'.f."-:::-..:?-':.'7,;;'::",7,:-,7•::',::,..'..5.Y......-::-;;,1,,,-:-,. .",.;.;;; ;L..,-:.;,,I !.'- i:"i: ..:;*.-!?:'.-''''''.,`V:'''...S1,?....'. .•;?*:;13:i'':',7-rie!,r4,?‘:',.;.'"A'''':',.:';',3::', .V.-11'''''' ':••i'.:t''..i.!'''-v.:''';'": .t.*-:',C.'".";f'ff;;;.;g7i•-•:-,:f '-'..?-,;',1'fir:f.,!iqt-. .,,,,!'-'2'.".:;:•.,..,,--,C:',,,:::'.'.'i:::;..-.-;•.,i'i.„:'.vir,',.•.:ezi,,,`,•t::-',',,c,"..F ;!-:..;W,;;:i..?,;&',IK..";:i:,t,:ffiNic'.itt'A.'",,,,::::.;.4,:i.E:i.-.7i.,4--i.:,2,!... .- -,1•: )..!--s-i-,...;:. ,>:.U:.:ILZI::,;'.:,z..•:-;:,;5-N7., pp-,C,::;;; :.?.;,y.•.:,...,;5:,::'•....-.--_,z;.,,,,:',.,_',..1:..'r•!.:.',...:;,..,:..,',...•,. it,:iff4.f..1.*A.L...8,:r,a47:;•:,;?0,i4A.2..'Kila4";k7-..%;:i'.W:(( . ;--1•3:;..!..i•;-i'-;*4-.,. ".b/C'''''', . . .- 4.1-...:.;'..'..,:-::::: '',-','-'..."-,.,i:::',';:f.':(:',....::.1,...:j:,:',;,---.-:}.:?: ;::.:::: :.. t.'•,-,:j:-...,,-•"'-';',:.-•-2,....-.11 .. .;'?A'•-•-`74V-...1:1-1 ,"kjr7.r:?..';''A':.-',.:';':',..:.;.•i;2:;::',:'.`.7,!•••:'-ij-T.::),:.'..t.. ...::::......,';•.:::;,:.::,",',.ils,.. .",....::•••,:•.• :f.:,-:)--•,:-.:,:•.:i-•',:-,2:.1.1*!..,.! .;.'.--) •'.. ,A.. •• ,...*;.,J17:,•:::,'41rr....„,.,i.,-,:•.,..-,:..;,,,s....:7...:,.:„.;,.,-,....:,..,..,,..;.,,..,...,,,...;y,.;...:•,;:::,,... ---7-•.:-::•%•::.:-:'•'';'•:•'i.''2,-,:".•-•-:::''''':';',..='!;,-;;;:'`...-.;-1;.':'•"•',." 7-.',,•;';'''-';'"•:-.•' ',..ii.:a•'-'''';';'•'•':"•-•,',."-:;,:-.,:: •b- ..,%'•:-'2".. ,&?...:1-q,.,''',•:,:-, ..'F..•::,:,•'.•:",,-;,,•': ••.•:-:,,,.,`...'••,',"r'c':•-:";:•'-,•'.V-'`''f',,,,•:.,•':%:.•-•:,;•::',.::,-.V..'.•"‘..-•:-'•-'","':.' ,..,•:,:,,:,!.-.;.,:..7.--;-,,,,r.:;,••••::,-,...,%:.,,,..„.-.%,:,..::.;,•.;:: ..--,.:7,p,..;,•,. ...-v* ,..,: ,.-.,,,,..:: ,:...,::;.•„,,j.,,::,...,%-..e.;,„...,.--7. •: . V:5:. ;!:-'.::•,-,:::'::;:,,,",..„;.....,?;;;•.-i'.:-.;',*;;i::::•`:::::',..,`i'::,:-:''':...''.:;"?--t,;',-...-;:.,:•;•••:':::':?.''.1::.'.::',1','-•.-..•":•..:...j,;..' 1..::. ,.., . - - •'`..:.----::-..:-::-....Y.:-..'::.:..::.,..c••.'.....'.;,:;,•''':‘:':•`..,'.::....--- ,:;:'...-..-:"..,'...,:;.s.',-Ii-:',,s-,;''''f.: ";k:1--;.:',..:-..-j. :Tx...-•:.1 ','''-'-':::'s'`'""' ••' •• - .,.. ..•,, . . . 2149N ENVVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r'o..YLS DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 21, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 2, 1987 EFC - 071 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-079-87 PROPONENT: MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. PROJECT TITLE: SOUTH LIND SQUARE PHASE II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 54,250 SQ. FT BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 ACRES IN KOLL BUSINESS CENTER. LOCATION: S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st SITE AREA: 4.37 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics x 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation x ' 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation_ . 14) Transportation f 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: . L a drCoV e /3/2k, . As,-,ir kei/R-7-aeb- ( je,-" a, Q./T,.-/ d,(./tee 19�//« 7' 1-h o a/d 7 ,`2J( 1'6 `/e I-0 17 da/1 ,/&tee 741,--ee� !creme cC- U, t,,, (e ,1-0/lei s g.J 7-4e /fe --1 17 tu''C C . 0efi •9n. TG e . /a")dr«`o7w V 74-a//r ct / fr /e p/Cfl6'f G. /he .(-( r C' . G� ems- `cs /y �/'( J Gt dPc o r GG T/'v e eka4 eGt 7L m c'rl=l a /may 1- c,/e per ��e/( c /7&e(, 6 / .71- SLJ r/d a4 c.) ,./ �e/ the 4) 7 s,ie ::..7c d=.7a/ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info tion is eeded to properly assess this proposal. 7 <i/ c -A / /Z /7 P Signature f Director or Authorized Representative Date f'l PP d � 1J ll U e- ''i//16- �&727. e /- c`�w 1"ate �&„ Form d rl'Y//A I �/ ... is . „w.e, J7.) ..„z 5/..w./vd -e/j 771 fir/ �o i (r > �• 9 G > /'/ 9 / 0/p/� -7/d 1 707-'6 % d/'A'.79 (4/9 / G/� -772_2 t /y�1f o /'� 2y—� j � � /,)�eJ� �� � rig to//4a A740 ky2 v 7.41 In 9 7,D 44,,p dr/i/e4 ,9 6)y-' v o/'��7 RENT"" BUILDING & ZONING DEN -TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-079-87 PROPONENT : MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. PROJECT TITLE : SOUTH LIND SOUARE PHASE TI BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A STTF. APPROVAL To rnigSTRTTrT A Fgti ? R SO. FT. BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 1c N OLT, BTJSTNESS CFNTFR. LOCATION : S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st TO : ri PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION r-i TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ri UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON nrTnRRR 7 l QR7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Ar,eJ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS fl NOT APPROVED 460/(ra4 74 /'('�di_r dcJ<- ,Celr( e ahGQ Dde--a /Wk__ aLT7Ue o4 ,S// e r�C//'�7L/G 6 6,-7L /1<-7` /el' 5-4// /7u Pin e j t i4(eG� Ib l 111grove / e. do,,- / 1� 2 �ey� h. �h 6l fA ~re /4e/ �,• ��fk-cem. d//e11 A,cPh CZ'a714 rAoc,eJ , DATE: O / SIIGGNAT /� OF DIREC,TT R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 16/7 ,412‘//l ,, G/���(/ `'FCl/z''rC7"/6� k4 c& 6C REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 { 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Qollc. DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEM]3ER 21, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 2, 1987 EFC - 071 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-079-87 PROPONENT: MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. PROJECT TITLE: SOUTH LIND SQUARE PHASE II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 54,250 SQ. FT BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 ACRES IN KOLL BUSINESS CENTER. LOCATION: S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st SITE AREA: 4.37 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or. areas where additional on information is needed to properly assess this proposal. / - 7�� Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEN FWIENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-079-87 PROPONENT : MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES. P.S. PROJECT TITLE : SOUTH LIND sauw PHASE II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A STTR APPRnvAT: Tn rnmgmpTTf T A sa 9r1 SQ. FT. BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 A.CRE.$ BUSINESS CENTER_ LOCATION : S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st TO : ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ® ENGINEERING DIVISION r1TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ri UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT LI BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT EOLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ri OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON OCTnRPP 2 1 (127 (/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; �-P APPROVED [] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED DATE: LL LL SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 70r' rv- DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 2i, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 2, 1987 EFC - 071 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-079-87 PROPONENT: MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. PROJECT TITLE: SOUTH LIND SQUARE PHASE II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 54,250 SQ. FT BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 ACRES IN KOLL BUSINESS CENTER. LOCATION: S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st SITE AREA: 4.37 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation • 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • SLcu s ZL Liu"7 1: 1'07 )c) ApPlt Yy\ 17L ct ")�(,t- ,%vI ��.b We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. e L I C- 7 do 2 Signature of Direc�£pr or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 - fENT^�1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPT -TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-079-87 PROPONENT : MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES. P,S. PROJECT TITLE : SOUTH LIND SOUARE PHASE TI BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A STTF APPRfVAT, Tn rnNJTRTTCT A r 4 7cn SO. FT. BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 ACRE _N KQLT_, BUTNFSS CENTER__ LOCATION : S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION Ell FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU EIPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT TjBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON nrTnRFR 9 1 (1g7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED [1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS [' NOT APPROVED DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: uk\CA1 ii DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 21, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 2, 1987 EFC - 071 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-079-87 PROPONENT: MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. PROJECT TITLE: SOUTH LIND SQUARE PHASE II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 54,250 SQ. FT BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 ACRES IN KOLL BUSINESS CENTER: LOCATION: S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st SITE AREA: 4.37 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth !� 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 1 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • i N We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or. areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. C-- 4�'✓ri�- Sig±e of birector or uthorized Representative Date Form 4 • RENTS--- BUILDING & ZONING DEPI "MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-079-87 PROPONENT : MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. PROJECT TITLE : SOUTH LIND SOUA'RE PHASE II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A SITR APPROVAT, TO C'nNRTRTTf T A 4, cn SO. FT. BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 ACRES ,IN KOLL BUSINESS CFJTE3_ LOCATION : S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st TO : fl PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION Ti TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : F-1 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION F-1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ELBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON fCTlRPR 7 l L1R7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : RAPPROVED 11APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ENOT APPROVED /' C Oce4-1-;;;_-- DATE: 9°---cc 7 47 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 . / 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET VV REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: POI1c_`A l a leic pr e9 DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER V1, 1987 COMMENTS DUfpLIL'DP B IIFT D AFNT EFC - 071 - 87 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S). : sA-079-87 D S E P 2 1 1987 IT PROPONENT: MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P:S. MOVE !), PROJECT TITLE: SOUTH LIND SQUARE PHASE II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 54,250 SQ. FT BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 ACRES IN KOLL BUSINESS CENTER. LOCATION: S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st SITE AREA: 4.37 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION LITV OF RENTON IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth RECE "/ E IU1 ✓ 2) Air OCT 987 3) Water BUILDING I ZOIliiva UEPT. 4) Plants r I) • 5) Animals ✓ lri 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health ✓ 8) Land and Shoreline Use ✓ 9) Housing ✓ 10) Aesthetics ✓ �� 11) Light and Glare ✓ 12) Recreation ✓ 1- 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ✓ 14) Transportation ✓' 15) Public Services ✓ 16) Utilities COMMENTS: rwat=2TX.9 trve-ge-- ---. +Lc_ cc- Mk- La-.t-ot. u,:�►Y I -�—' lateAL- 2 . .01-AA-01- "xv4-jiew+.4 (AAA,. VI M P evirez..4 raAt. vni-ut--5 tu,‘.2r Lot_s c..eyyt.41,14,tee, . es-rat:x(1e._ We have reviewed this application with particular attention t those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or. areas where additional information is need to properly assess this pro osal. (' a--1---1 2 ) Signature of Director or A horized ep sentative Da e Form 4 11 II rYK4- c-Thev-L44w-iisoi--)-6 i) • -)on4e), nr .)-01 I • viherkov kinfriC414 02414e)f..1 In'rYrY'A - - 2a,277,0:' '71'2?A2 ' rrw,,e+. , 24 '10rti ' p-r-rAga-d r-2C) )--rrYpr-?..f72..A (2Ae2sHo-d( ihne4017 "a?'24 lt_t • „ - s 1 hi • " RENTI BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : sA-079-87 PROPONENT : MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES. P.S. PROJECT TITLE : SOUTH LIND SOUARE PHASE TI BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLTS'ATION FOR A STTR APPROVAL Tf1 CONgTRTTfT A 44 ?4fl SO. FT. BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 ACRES IN KOLL BUSINESS CENTER_ LOCATION : S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st TO : [1] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ® ENGINEERING DIVISION ri TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : LI UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT LII BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT LI POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON OCTIRFR J l Q1R7 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; akALaTrYNA)t-- APPROVED LI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS [1 NOT APPROVED sp ,e-rvulki.A-1--s CITY OF ' ENTON RE C E 6 V ED COT 3,1987 BUILDING /ZONING Ci2T. • DATE:047 2 SIGNATURE OF DIREC R OR A THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 Y 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Uri A1cs DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 21, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 2, 1987 EFC — 071 — 87 d APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-079-87 PROPONENT: MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P—.S. PROJECT TITLE: SOUTH LIND SQUARE PHASE II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 54,250 SO. FT BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 ACRES IN KOLL BUSINESS CENTER. LOCATION: S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st SITE AREA: 4.37 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION ), IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services / 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • (-) -, /„,>") \I is,.-V ( '' P We have rev this this application with particular attention to those areas we ( -- have expertise i . a have identified areas of probable impact or. areas where additional nfor , ion i needed to properly assess this proposal. /C I _ 87 Signature pf Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENTI BUILDING & ZONING DEPA' 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 — 87 . APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-079-87 • PROPONENT : MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P,S. PROJECT TITLE : SOUTH LIND SOUARE P AS . TT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A STTR APPROVAT. Tn CnNSTRTTrT A Sa 7r1 SO. FT. BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 ACRES IN KOLL BUSTNESS CENTER. LOCATION ; S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ®UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT CITY OF Norrou RE C E V th El POLICE DEPARTMENT ElPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OCT 119R7 ÜOTHERS : • BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON nC`T1RFR 7 1 QR7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; pi ® APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Le 8 /(0.L..4. SOSIN S C'kn/TEe UTILITY APPROVAL MIN r Soil 4 ,C✓^14) So. f i-/iT LATE COMERS AGREEI;sEa LATE COMERS AGNEW:E a /-� SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT C di.(.7'.,L- A/0 ��- ��{+�' n •0a'-r t4---C . .0,0 d/¢r - . �- SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT C[:r:22-SEb^d`ER' VO5 S•4¢ �S�w�T x /g2,Lo28'Lfl SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AEAEIdrARGE-WATER AID SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER /\!D 4cA APPROVED WATER PLAN ,Es APPROVED SEWER PUN APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS � d6;11 / 1 g BY ,•4E DEPT..'1 "1 PLEf 'RYA Oty DATE: /` - f - c(77 SIGNATUR: 'i DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE jam. : . -�-�+- 2 -®d, �e" . 3 1.r44-,,,,,L04z4;/1c-frte,014,0_, d� IsION 5/198 6 509�'d l4 + 1+� /a-eaao �.B�+C/-14C - -Form 182 4111) ?149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHELF REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTtre , BER 21, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 2, 1987 EFC - 071 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-079-87 PROPONENT: MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. ' PROJECT TITLE: SOUTH LIND SQUARE PHASE II + _ry BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A SITE AP R AYA OONSTRUCT A 54,250 SQ. FT BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 ACRES IN KOLL BUSINESS CENTER. r---fri!criPkTTNI 0 k1; r`E LOCATION: S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st `� SEP r 1987 SITE AREA: 4.37 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): BULUyg i� se�rsca b �'e. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation ' 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or. areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENTS BUILDING & ZONING DEP OMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : sA-079-87 PROPONENT : MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES. P.S. PROJECT TITLE : SOUTH LIND SQUARE PHASE II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPr,ICATION FOR A STIR APPRnVAT. T(1 C'(1NGTRTTC'T A Sa�2�n SO. FT. BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 . CR S 1T] cOLL BUSINESS CENTER. LOCATION : S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION F-1 TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : LI UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ETFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT [' POLICE DEPARTMENT LI POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON. OCTfRRR > 1 QR7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED ELAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED .. & L Qom "Z 74, ,ce airs, � :::,7_22,zeit:z ° DATE : 7 /q17 SIGNAT RE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 ` REQU I RCI) FIRE FLow CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME -_S-'dc/T/� //.Sly -5 OuA 7?c U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS ,l/,yp ',9v4 _-_ FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY V (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASSFIICEFIRE FLOW)D 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 3-`/25 ' -7= 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): 1i,-e.5C) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: — /pC hsa GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARDI, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B)PM (C) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) ,�/ /f~/ 5 GPM CD) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY CYM a) AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE ',FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MA. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH 11 - 30 20% MAX. -----'`'��_ ADD /.b- % 31 - 60 15% MAX. EAST 70' ADD i_ $ 31 -100MAX. SOUTH G 5- ADD /O % 10% 102 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL "!5` ADD /0 $ 101 OR-1 4-HR WALLOTAL. % OF ADJUSTMENT 0% MAX.� (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : I/ % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJUSTMENT: / �!3q.�_?7.5- GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: GPM (G) , CIF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) l (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: ` • //ke'.4;. ; 3 � � fe izs� cPM CH)II. SIGNED: ' -�_ 3 zSD •//',(9 . SATE zi. /S6F _3 s CITY OF RENTON ,;,, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director September 18, 1987 Lynn Takeuchi Mackenzie/Saito & Associates 300 120 Ave. N.E. Bldg. 3 Suite 233 Bellevue, Washington 98005 RE: Site Approval for South Lind Square, 54,250 sq. ft. office/warehouse. Files: ECF-071-87, SA-079-87 Dear Mr. Takeuchi: The Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted your environmental checklist application for the above referenced project. Your application has been routed and tentatively scheduled for the Environmental Review Committee on October 7, 1987, to consider your environmental checklist. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of your project, please contact Betty Grimshaw of this office at 235-2540. erely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:BG 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 pie CITY =� F ENTON 0011. ear BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director September 18, 1987 Spieker Partners 11400 S.E. 8th Bellevue, WA 98004 RE: Site Approval for South Lind Square, 54,250 sq. ft. office/warehouse. Files: ECF-071-87, SA-079-87 Dear Sirs: The Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted your environmental checklist application for the above referenced project. Your application has been routed and tentatively scheduled for the Environmental Review Committee on October 7, 1987, to consider your environmental checklist. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of your project, please contact Betty Grimshaw of this office at 235-2540. Si ely, V Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:BG 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 - MACKENZIE/SAITO & SOCIATES, P.S. [1-,E f7 -X IF VEQ SE FT`tfn.= 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3, SUITE 233 J BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 Date: September 10, 1987 Project Number 387511 To: City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington Attention: Building & Zoning Project Name: South Lind Square Phase II Please find attached: shop drawings X plans -samples specifications copy of letter -change order details calculations • Number of copies: Description: 1 M/SA Check #854 for Environmental Review & Site Approval 8 Master Application (Original + 7 Copies) 8 Environmental Check List (Original + 7 Copies) 7 Legal Description 1 Title Report 1 Mailing Labels & Postage 7 Vicinity Map 7 Land Use Map 7 ,Site Plan/Grading Plan For your use For your review - For approval As requested REMARKS: 7 Landscape Plan 7 Building Elevations/Building Sections 1 82 x 11" PMT of Site Plan 1 82 x 11" PMT of Landscape Plan 1 82 x 11" PMT of Building Elevation/Section Copy to: Signed: Paul Engert/mo Mailed X Delivered by Jill -To be picked up If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. mP ) CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director September 9, 1987 Richard Romney 11400 S.E. 8th Street Bellevue, Wa. 98004 SUBJECT: SOUTH LIND SQUARE, PHASE II Dear Mr. Romney: Your request per your letter dated 'September 8, 1987, to grade and install crushed rock onto the Phase II portion of South Lind Square appears to be in the best interest of both parties. The reduction of tracking of mud onto the public right of way and clogging the storm drains would be helpful. I looked at the site approval given in 1986 and this should not obstruct the application review. Sincerely, ,---4°./42.6, Ronald G. Nelson Building & Zoning Director RGN:plp:p1081 cc: Jim Hanson, Assistant Building Director 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 11400 S.E.8th Street �--- Bellevue,WA 98004 206 453-1600 SPIEKER September 8, 1987 ?ey �"4`' �� v�ON PARTNERS ri 16.1') S E P 9- LY) Mr. Ron Nelson Building & Zoning Director City of Renton BUILDINGZ®���� D� Municipal Building ` 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Work on South Lind Square, Phase II, located at Lind Avenue and 41st Dear Mr. Nelson: As I have discussed with you and Mr. Houghton, we would like the City's approval to clear, grade and place crushed rock on the vacant piece of land located at 41st and Lind (site plan attached) . Our intention is to get the site ready for construction of an approximate 55,000 square foot building to be built during the winter. During construction of the first phase of South Lind Square, we noted that the soils retained water for a long period of time. Thus, even though the buildings were ready in March, we were not able to pave the site until mid-May. Our prospective tenant would like to move into the second phase building between March and April, 1988. Thus it is imperative for us to prepare the site now in order to avoid working in a foot of mud throughout the winter. We feel that the City would also benefit from having much less mud tracked over the streets when the winter rain sets in, and the site would be much more appealing to neighboring businesses. We have no intention to use this site as a parking area, nor do we plan to place a surcharge on the land. If we can finalize the building location within the next month, we may approach you for permission to place an asphalt treated base in the areas designated for future parking. Both Spieker Partners as well as our new tenant appreciate your cooperation in this matter. We await your response. Sincerely, SPI R ART ?r ,"71 Richard L. Romney Partner Attachment 0N./4, CITY OF RENTO"T FILE NO(S): =rn9- ;-rf'") .11., cm, 4. B:.-.DING & ZONING DEPARTML. . r t ci'-DPI -8-1 mu MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of applications) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES Mackenzie/Saito & Associates, P.S. ADDRESS Q REZONE*(FROM TO ) 300 120th Ave. N.E. Bldg. 3 Suite 233 SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* Bellevue, Washington 98005 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* ® TELEPHONE SITE PLAN APPROVAL 321.85 ® SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL (206) 451-1005 No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE* From Section: NAME * Justification Required Lynn Takeuchi k' 745DRESS SUBDIVISIONS: I 300 120th Ave. N:E':: Bldg. 3 Suite 233 SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP ® TENTATIVE PLAT Bellevue, Washington 98005 U PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 451-1005 U WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: - Spieker Partners i ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 11400 S.E. 8th Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP a FINAL Bellevue, Washington 98004 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 453-1600 0 Residential Q Industrial Commercial Q Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS S.E. corner Lind Ave. & S.W. 41st ® TENTATIVE ED EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY FINAL Vacant MP PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: General Office/Warehouse NUMBER OF SPACES: �Ca ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE lig n n SQ. FT. ACRES - '.." AREA: 190,425 4.37 TOTAL FEES $436.85 CITY OF RRENTON AE.USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING ' DATT Mif. i I� APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: D SEP 1 0 1387 iAPPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ElAccepted ijn Incomplete Notification Sent On By:�Jr BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. ' (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: (,, ) \`(��" `D APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: CDAccepted ® Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: Oa Building Z1 Design Eng. Fire t51 Parks IJ Police 1X1 Policy Dev. [El Traffic Eng. IN Utilities REVISED 1-31-84 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). Lot 8 of Koll Business Center/Renton, as per plat recorded in Volume 114 of plats on pages 15 & 16, records of King County: situated in the City of Renton. County if King. State of Washington AFFIDAVIT I, being duly sworn, declare that I am C:1 authori d representative to act for the property owner, owner of the property involved in this apt lication aInd that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 1st DAY OF September 1987 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT Bellevue • Marsha 0kino ; (Name of Notary Public) + • 4431 153rd Ave!. S.E. , Bellevue, Washington 300 120th Ave. N.E. Bldg. 3 Suite 233 (Address) .. (Address) �;. _; Bellevue, Washington 98005 1 I, . O eye (City) . (State) ,(Zip) . • v,�//y//�J// /��,Q(pc�v^s6 (206) 451-1005 pc) (Telephone) Acceptance of/this `application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Foxm #174 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 8 of Koll Business Center/ Renton, as per plat record in Volume 114 of plats on pages 15 & 16, records of King County; situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. • CITY OFRENTC'.1 SEP101987 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. - MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.S. ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 300 120TH AVENUE NORTHEAST•BUILDING 3,SUITE 233 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005•(206)451-1005 September 10, 1987 South Lind Square Phase II Project #387511 PROJECT NARRATIVE: South Lind Square Phase II is the final phase of a two part office/warehouse development in Koll Business Center/Renton. Construction of Phase II is tentatively scheduled to begin in late October 1987 and reach completion by May 1988. licrry op ri SEP 1 p ' -. BUILDINGZD�VI�vG D EPT OF R. . 1,1 A >, ECF: kn - o1l -81 $ © z Ci' Y 't of Renton C Lu: s�_�-,9_g, awn 09A ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 9Air.60 SEPSE'O�P Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your • proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals,_ even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. ; A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: South Lind Square Phase II 2. Name of applicant: Mackenzie/Saito & Associates, P.S. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact.person: 300 120th Avenue N.E. Building 3 Suite 233 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Paul Enqert - 451-1005 4. Date checklist prepared: September 1, 1987 5. Agency requesting checklist: Cityof Renton 6. Proposed timingor schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction anticipated to begin November 1, 1987 CFI OF r,.'N-c:1 p S 1 o 1,9Ra 8U!�_, JG/ZOFP NING U F'T 7. Do you have any ph _ for future additions, expansions, c irther activity related r Ij to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. , I i None ! 9. Do you know whether applications are pending' for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. h No 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. None 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Site: 190,425 sq. ft. Building:I 54,250 sq. ft. To be used as general office/warehouse 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Lot-8 of Koll Business Center/Renton as per plat recorded in Volume 114 of plats, on pages 15 & 16, records of King County; situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH ' a a. General description of the site (circle one); rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 12% in a very isolated case. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel; peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Medium dense to dense granular fill of silty sand and gravel . d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No - 2 e. Describe the pose, type, and approximate que ;ies of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The existing soil has sufficient structural capacity to support the building. The ratio of cut to fill will be approx. equal on the site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 70% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Typical automobiles and construction machinery emissions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Minimize work machinery activity during peak traffic times. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet). the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None - 3 - 4) Will the p sal require surface water withdr is or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes. Entire site. Green River 100 year level 27.2 feet 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water?, Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No . 2) Describe waste material that will ;be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water from building and' parking into catch basins and directly to existing city storm water drainage system. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No - 4 - i d. Proposed me es to reduce or control surface, i _ Ind, and runoff water impacts, if any: Through grading, of site, contain runoff water to site and into city drainage facilities. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other o Shrubs gX grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Existing vegetation is low scrubby grass and will be replaced and altered in accordance with landscape plans submitted to the city. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Use of native plants. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds-and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Typical native birds Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other None Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. None - 5 - d. Proposed rr ures to preserve or enhance wildlii ,f any: None ' 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas. oil. wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be'used for heating, manufacturing, etc. In addition to electricity for normal office use, an electical heating system will be provided for the building. Natural gasiwill be stubbed out to the building to provide for any additional unforseen future requirements. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. ' No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building to meet Washington State Energy Code. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards. including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services,that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic, Railroad - 6 - • 2) What types a\ •levals of noise would be created t ;r associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term: Construction machinery/Normal business hours Long Term: Traffic/Normal business hours 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Effective coordination of construction sequence to minimize any excessive or unnecessary construction equipment. 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? -Site is currently vacant -Adjacent property used for a combination of retail , general office and warehouse space. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? MP f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? MP g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 100-125 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None - 7 — 1. Proposed r Auras to ensure the proposal is cc,. -atible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Project complies with existing conditions and 'is in line with 9. Housing the proposed area development. a. Approximately how many. units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 160-0" painted concrete and glass in dark amodized frames. b. What views in the immediate vicinity mould be altered or obstructed? No intrisiely valuable views I would be altered. c. Proposled measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Building set back sufficiently from existing roads with a generous amount of landscaping. I � 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Glare is possible from window glazing, but would be minimal . b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? q No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None evident d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Glare minimized by the type of glazing used (grey light 14) - 8 - 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Lind Avenue and S.W. 41st Street one major access at mid-site of each public street. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? No c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 222 0 - eliminated d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No - 9 - e. Will the pr :t use (or occur in the immediate! Anity of) water, rail, or - air transpori,amion? If so, generally describe. 'I Local rail lines are used tb the northwest of the site. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 952 trips. Peak volume at rush hour. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Promote carpooling measures. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. 'I II No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities I a. Circle utilities currently available ;at the site: electricit 6atural qa (watery) refuse service telephone�Canitary s_ei.feb septic system, other. II I b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Underground conduit to connect to existing city water, storm drainage , sanitary sewer and telephone service. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: - 10 - I #176 11-8-84 • • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHE FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? No increases to water or toxic substances are foreseen. An increase in the amount of cars in the area contributing to emissions in the air would be minimal relative to the existing traffic flow. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Promote carpools and use of mass transit. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The immediate site area has no significant wildlife that would be affected by this project. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed office/warehouse project should have a minor affect on existing city systems, and deplete energy on a heating use basis. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Compliance with the Washington State Energy Code. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? There are no environmental sensitive areas in the immediate vicinity of the site. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None - 11 - I 5. How would the E 'osal be likely to affect land a **reline use, including whether it would 'a`i ow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?? This project is in compliance with current plans for the area and would not adversely affect proposed land uses. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Increase:.landscape areas. Minimal b1lilding profile. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Miner increase in our usage of public streets. Very small increase on sanitary and_:storm drainage systems., Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: - Provide adequate connections and interface with existing city services. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state. or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the;environment. There are no conflicts. i SIGNATURE i I. the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. i'I Proponent: ( 6^-1(1147-4 - 1 Name Printed: Paul Engert - Mackenzie/Saito & Associates i i - 12 - ., '+;s 'tA:S 01-.. gny..F; 11 V V VV✓r1 4. .. FORM NO.WaAlt5000.1 '•* ,' i I' For use with Washington a Alaska men can Land Title Association 411. ^ 'kVM1 '•`=+t,,,.4 Owner's Policy—Form B-1970(Am, _, d 10-17.70) if P �//\(�t r(¢/ yVvf, So ufk L AA Jo t,.+" ti1. . i:.' .1•-r` p . f� ?y?;,;r SCHEDULE A - 1'y`u. 123 . 30 Polk No. 01-00-651063 t.'.' � tr • . Amount of Insurance$ 1 ,560,123 . 30 y u'"r; i '`1; Date of Policy October 24, 1985 at 8 : 30 A.M. Order No. ---- ' :' Prem: $3 , 067 .00 r#-1 1. Name of Insured: IL..i r < CROW-SPIEKER-HOSFORD #131, y.Ts ... limited partnership +;ti` 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which i9 covered by this policy is: • Fee simple estate :x .'d's ti4 I 1,4 LEI 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in: The Named Insured k. 0 a:1 { :� 11L 1987 • n. 1- J d t.l'^ivh�EPJZiE/S�11ttJ&ASS�C P.S, CITY cF r, N:—o•.i II LAL[ n nn N w.a • SEP 1 ®1,9 q r , x BUILDING/ZONING DEPT'. 4 : •F. i 3;1( Y s - x.M ,�,. .y`. 1t. �`•�.,.a'�3!Niv .... .... - ...11` t _.,t e. ._ �51n ..•> :la.t..• b. _ ..,,_ .r. _. i. s ..fi:-. -. ri} ; e•!,,ili.,„..,•• FORM NO.W d AK 5000-2 a{ e • e 4E .�gi;1:.-; • For use with Washington&Alaska American Lend Title Association ,'4.r s r Owner s Policy—Form 8-1970(Amended 10-17-70) ., S C H E D U L E A—Continued `'" The land referred to in this policy is situated in the Slate of Washington , County of . y ;�" + King , and is described as follows: r= Y•y'x - -we,.1:.'•- Lots 7 and 8 of Koll Business Center/Renton, as per plat recorded in " "•` `• • Volume 114 of Plats , on pages 15 and 16 , records of King County; A=, ::.-.',.'• Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. • • t' I • ' r' • I^ • I • t • . . • 010 FORM NO.W 6000-3 REVISEDARD) 1111 For use with Washington Region Amor and Title Association Owner's Policy—Form B—1970(Amended 10.18-70) • • SCHEDULE B ` '; '=: z"ih ' This policy does not insure against loss or damage, nor against costs, attorneys'fees or expenses, any or all of which arise •by reason of the following: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS 1.Encroachments or questions of location,boundary and area,which an accurate survey may disclose. 2.Public or private easements, streets, roads, alleys or highways, unless disclosed of record by recorded plat or con- veyance,or decree of a court of record. • :. 3.Rights.or claims of persons in possession,or claiming to he in possession,not disclosed by the public records. • • 4.Material or labor liens,or liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not disclosed by the public records. 5.Water rights or matters relating thereto. 6.Any service,installation or construction charges for sewer,water,electricity,or garbage removal. 7. Mining claims,reservations or exceptions in Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. 8.General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same • • • becoming a lien. 9.Right of use,control or regulation by the United States of America,in the exercise of powers over navigation. 10.Any prohibition of or limitation of the use, occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any portion which is now or has been formerly covered by water. t` SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS S+ 1. General taxes , as follows , together .with interest and penalty, if any, after delinquency: • Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid Principal Balance 392680-0070-03 • WE $5 ,623. 79 $2,811 .89 $2,811. 90 (Covers Lot 7) • • 392680-0080-'01. 1985 $5,414 .63 $2,707.31 $2 ,707 . 32 (Covers Lot .8) • • . Special taxes , as follows , together with interest and penalty, . if any, after delinquency:. Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid Principal Balance' • 392680-0070-03 1985 $ 81.97 • $ • 40. 99 $ 40. 98 • . (Covers Lot 7) 392680-0080-01 1985 $ 78. 95 $ 39.48 $ 39. 47 (Covers Lot 8) • •°I - continued - i Y'}; .. 411 $ a • 411. a SCHEDULE B (cont nued) 5 '}ice';� .w 2. UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: M' °i; :'' '7• ' GRANTEE: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, �. ; ' :. a Washington corporation ,"? ' `` PURPOSE: Underground electricc transmission and distribution system ' .. . AREA AFFECTED: Easement "A" - The South 15 feet of Lots 1 , ,,. 2 and 3 AND the Easterly 15 feet of Lots 3 and 5 • 1 Easement "B01 - The Westerly 10 feet of ,,-e Lots 1, 7 and 8 AND the Northerly 10 feet ',t of Lots 6 and 7 °4I Easement "C" - The Easterly portion of Lot 2 , the Westerly portion of Lot _3, the ,.t ; . Easterly portion of Lot 8 , the Westerly portion of Lot 5 , the Northerly portion a of Lot 5 , and the Westerly portion of Lot 6 "4 ' RECORDED: April 17 , 1980 RECORDING NO. : 800417-0684 .. Contains covenant prohibiting structures over said easement or ; I other activity which might endanger the underground system. • , T' I 3 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: '1 ! GRANTEE: City of Renton, a municipal corporation qi PURPOSE: A walk and landscape easement t ' AREA AFFECTED: 15 feet in width adjoining East Valley Highway and S.W. 43rd Street and 10 feet in width adjoining all other public f .streets within Lots 1 , 2, 3, 5 , 6, 7 and 8 ..t i RECORDED: June 4 , 1980 j 1 RECORDING NO. : 800604-0533 4. 4.. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: I • GRANTEE: City of Renton, a municipal corporation PURPOSE: Water mains with necessary appurtenances AREA AFFECTED: . The South 20. 00 feet of the North 30. 00 fee of the West 20.00 feet of the East 35. 00 1 feet of Lot 7 ;• 4 The South 20 . 00 feet of the North 30. 00 fee = � ; of the West 20.00 feet of the East 405.00 E ,;.. 1 feet of Lot 7 ; • - continued - ..'? •, ,..-. ».,., .•..;: . ..• .ti: mritcreamormatmankrenawsanumarriammiztivxmayssmincintmemmar • 41// IF • SCHEDULE B (con hued) ; . . • r` JjParagraph 4 (continued) The North 15. 00 feet of the South 30. 00 feet of the West 15. 00 feet of the East ,... •A 140. 00 feet of Lot 7 ; The North 20. 00 feet of the South 35. 00 - , feet of the West 25. 00 feet of the East 395 . 00 feet of Lot 7 ; The North 15. 00 feet of the South 30.00 feet of the West 20 .00 feet of the East 145 .00 feet of Lot 8 RECORDED: June 24 , 1980 RECORDING NO. : 800624-0643 5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DISCLOSED BY: Instrument recorded under Recording No. 810521-0487 PURPOSE: Ingress, egress and utilities AREA AFFECTED: The Southerly 12.5 feet of the Westerly 170.28 feet of Lot 8 III 6. Easements , restrictions, slope rights , notes and dedications , bythe recorded plats of Burlington Northern Orillia as disclosed Industrial Par of Renton, Division 1, and of Koll Business Center/Re 7 . , Restrictions imposed by instrument recorded on December 4, 1978 , under Recording No. 781204-0682. 8. Restrictions imposed by instrument recorded on December 15 , 1983, under Recording No. 831215-0123. • 9. Reservations contained in deeds recorded under Recording Nos . 4547626 , 4547627 , 4547628 , 4547629, 4547630, 4547631 and 4547632 , as follows : Reserving right to retain 50% of any and all royalties which may be derived from all oil produced on or from said property. • 10. Reservations contained in deed recorded under Recording No. 750401-0479 and amended by deed recorded under Recording No. 781130-1027. . - continued - e • el. SCHEDULE B (continued) 11. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Bruce Hosford, as nominee for a yr partnership to be formed PURPOSE: Paving encroachment AREA AFFECTED: As herein described DATED: August 28 , 1985 RECORDED: August 30 , 1985 4 RECORDING NO: 8508301299 GGt 12. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: . . GRANTEE: Bruce Hosford, as nominee for a partnership to be formed PURPOSE: Ingress , egress and movement of vehicles and pedestrians AREA AFFECTED: As herein described DATED: August 28, 1985 'r RECORDED: August 30, 1985 '" RECORDING NO: ; 8508301299 4 . END OF EXCEPTIONS ?.. .anr ern ewo mf astir wwwtrom emtp +xymcww-sumtsnygm.rma... I.•(P,rauu.dTuam AuW'.• SP) 6S I D t 1 Demo by Checkedfiiiill D■te Plat NG, ` Order No. - • I . , I � 1, 1 SKETCH OF PROPERTY SE OUT IN ATTACHED ORDER i To assist in locating the premises. It ! not based on a survey, and the company • assumes no liability for variations if any, in dimensions and location. , 1 1 I2.5350— 0110 S.W. 41 st. STREET N 88. 36' 37'W I 1 1 sr 12 1 515.11 o 55.00 ri ..• . R .30•• 90° 18' 38• • o L• 86.69 . 1 w 7 • ,moo N R? • g uJ 200075 intv N 1118 - .I 1 2 •NQ d I s 1 co so Z to 3I 23 - 101 2- m e N 08° 36' 37. W _ _ — _i? _ • �_. s 68.so— tlM7tsrmnuBEasemenl 1 fr J__578.50— _ In 1,,..-- •377.5t • W ®+ n1 D i i! Ni 1...: E.- j..1::: NN 15.— 1 . < 392Co80-c tL _ 76E lel 5 . VWterman�ement 0 3 ' " — — 41300.00— — — 276.69 I larc- IS� • 40 w I ;,, 2 \•� 1 312.Cerdo 0 Iof 1 sti 65205 Ch N 60851 QI . a; io i R c 55.00 N " • 'N .p • 89. 41'22' (\ 86.09 a I i L • N1 88 tee'37.W 1244.11 • l 2T6.69 1 , 657.49 • 1 S +r • j N 88. 36' 37 W w T . 5/, Note—This map does not purport to show all highways, roads or easements affecting the property. i4 _t CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE: SOUTH LIND SQUARE-PHASE II APPLICANT: MACKENZIE/SAITO ASSOCIATES, P.S. • APPLICATION NUMBER: SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-079-87 The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER Koll Northwest Associates 2021 152nd Ave. N.E. - Suite D 392680003002 Redmond, Washington 98052 Prudential Ins. Co. of 2049 Century Park E. #1300 125380017009 America Los Angeles, California 90067 Burlington Northern RR 2100 First Interstate Center 125380016001 999 Third Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 Koll Northwest Associates 2021 152nd Ave. N.E. - Suite D 392680006005 Redmond, Washington 98052 Forty First Place Associates 621 Pacific Avenue #215 392680004000 Tacoma, Washington 98402 Koll Northwest Associates 2021 152nd Ave. N.E. - Suite D 392680005007 Redmond, Washington 98052 Farmers Insurance Exchange 4680 Wilshire Blvd. 392680001006 Los Angeles, California 90010 Commercial Prop. Inv. III 6000 Southcenter Blvd.-Suite 250 '.392680002004 Seattle, Washington 98188 Walter D. Northfield, Jr. 4836 N.E. 85th 312305909706 Seattle, Washington 98115 Orilla Indl . Dist. Assoc. I 18000 Pacific Highway South 312305903303 Suite 1115 Seattle, Washington 98188 Mazda Dist. N.W. Inc. 8621 South 180th Street 312305912106 Kent, Washington 98031 Genuine Parts Company 2999 Circle 75 Parkway 312305912908 Atlanta, Georgia 30339 The Boeing Company Prop. Tax Dept. Mail Stop 13-21 312305901208' P.O. Box 3707 Seattle, Washington 98124 CITY OF RENTO!-I —� Mcei \\11 SEP 101 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. E•. I ASSESSOR'S • NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER CERTIFICATION I. Marsha Okino , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at 4431 153rd Ave. S.E. ,Be1,levugn ` the 2nd ,day of,. September SIGNED: Y1 `NSW Jac,l G Fa �i: >' CERTIFICATION OF MAILING �.. D I. I�ERR-( :J.l.l'NCs. , hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval Were mailed on OC1'• 5- 9P,h7. , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at A,/7 p,t) on the day of nc.T-0.zs—•,e,.iigg7 _4,0(194..e„e, SIGNED: �,l .f. (A"-\ FORM 2013 • , • 6OWwV2-3 I -23 - -KENT-RENTON - 600�, ,ao61 - - -t,, 51963 — • a s 1::1 -- . �o I �_►3 ali 0 4.0 361 a BURLINGTON - NORTHERN ORILLIA ! ,z - , 2 el; 4 • I • 5 f Iy f INDUSTRIAL PARK i3OF RENTON DIV. I ;o• I °; 65661 ,i I 5s3s7 �% • S.W. 41ST • ST. 515.0 421 I 278A2 rB • •. • v� i , visa C Q 4 ,::: - - j 30a27. N �� GOV'T. LOT Ir L _ B I • b�/� S 1 i L11� ., 7 6 ' •/ •i • J i Z n, 28.84 AC. f z Li Glacier Park Co. __ —_ t ! I G7 _ _ - - - - iz� - - � '_ I• Q : �j -568-5------- c- rn•..., -221ii.,.. i. 1.-- , SIDE ,/,2 ../,/ ;; �� /:, • ( T ....-1/221/ ,./..;,/ /////".//' / / ,, / ,./ --... - . ,..- • \•ci ./ Al 0 14'\ ,io7 . —H.=re-.�� 57 9TF,i-r7-7 - - A 5usr 4 4 - - . . "relli .. .-, ai -• ti�0 1.2 2 A c. 1 ° North • VICINITY 11IIAP Q �� 3 244-II 276 69 " 136.69 232:0 • �'o 43RD CORPORATE • ST. LIMIT -, .\ S.W. REN�`ON aok CI0 =AB =r{3QeC-49 ✓! B =1 9C) BO9EZ?❑ = C3G7 = no0 = 3C3.❑ = 0C3 ❑ o ❑ = r = rQ ❑ oE' CORPORATE LIMIT too F` KENT .• qyq. 3 1 I • 0. LAND USE MAP • _N'o.rth---. . . . . - . .. .._ •_ • . • o u■' s „'s u • . •::::: 11 !grill:1'4E 14101! PAO . ... TrI.,....11I : :::i...;i::•••.:::.*.::i:'•:. ;i':,:.•C' • .: _-_-_--_---:_--_--_. '.• '..." Nlik... li: '••:::1'•'::]:::::1:::.1. -:',1. .-_-_-.------- •• ''''.•••••••••••••••••••••:".911 4/ il• 'III":g ipst Elb 4 Mil .. ..:•,... • ` inHo-=___ }- 10 s•9' aka..! .. . ___ , \Nr.-• . ....„... • ,,_ .- ___-_-___.;__,_,,_____-_)_-_-_-_-_•___. rig , Log ,; :as%.1Bffi,„ •4 • I/ --y�-�'�-f�-/'-1 s •-____=_____ I . ri■ . •°fir I; ■. • ` -'0.1]• J t•• -OIT.IIRCr ,000ao0� - --- - -� : ��■: •goo; :Pg j ■y Ii Fw°�: 4• (1'C^ Q ---_ o0000nOoo • PZMO'f. i �■ � ■��■�I Y II -_-- -•n000°00000°.,c: - --- f■f.0.■: a ■ ` •• • fy�. _ •000000000000 _-•-- �r ■r■■ ■ ■ ■ •' \'' t^j�0 C 1., •.- .00000000000000 --__- f-/•�.' • �■I:■■■ a ■a■■ II: - • � � ,r•t `000000000000000 - --- T'• _ """' .°0000000 a 00000•.. -' e_ "1* • i9•._ Di •�;: : to. .r 1 �Li • 900000000000•0 -� I 1 t' • ••0000000. r �.m 1 ■..�- ,• • 00000. • • • • 1 f.p •':.'':;:�::; :.';".,: • • \,\• • •.•. . r — fir Ai lb 41851► :- , . / .11111:niti , '''-givissimugl, , . ,___-M-b• -__. 41 zi 140., . 4::::::4,...:al . 1:...1.0 f -•_-------------------- ------------ ' 't- i. II■ ;WWII ■ ---- --_- - -- IIIII - _� :� • .' . . . I■ ..i is a:■■i : .■IMI, me =i:i -_`?`tom _.:_ - 4° C �' ■■:: .•.•. IIII ■■■:Mtn I ..4-111111 _ •0°0°4°•___ •' )000 • __- ....‘14,.:% '.:1-'''''''-; • Aire T!' I ■:i11i■ .. •■r ■■ .:' - Q''• --- -:-.:--_---_-_--_-• °000 4.r:•. 004D0• $ • . ■■i i - I ■■■ ■U■■: :■ ■■i•: _--- - --- - �:t:•• 0000n • J0o:6J4 •1 El.t....--- L _• •. 1 jIiIII!IIIIIjIiP'J: : _ -_ _MPZMD_ Illtillt:•.,..apt < _==__ ===__= - ==- I • ' r';),t:■:a3ee■x i;0 ..,_3.:::....; -_-- -- _ _ _ 'c .�•r , I.c'-I- a .�4a "''J`� --- ---- __ - - fir. •4 -1 '^y • • t?..1;'.--_--_--_------_--_---_---*..::".:?-'i;:l..LT:';`..! .------------------- ----_-: '-', • • j I I). (- • ` _ _-  _ - -• =_ _ _-_ _______1 --- n _ . i, 4.-_, --_-trtstairK -_-_- 1_-st_P-_, c_-_-_-_-_-_-. -_-_- J,.f,-! Nag i , ...:::::,:,i:.,,,a II•NI II:IN . �ir _._-_ �+ TC• • Q■■, .�,,'0000000.• - i Olga ■■fll■•11• t :::::::. - -----i ----- .SI 1 G• l=/■■.:■. 0000000 xr A f■U■_.• ,• _ :.iiii:�:•ffr,'r o0000000°�' `!•r ►. 'wcca ■■■i o00000000 _ r,l��a�l+■ .00000000 ��7 � =_.7UCZ_IIl ■ 0000000•• ,• j�•-- s - ={3Hlae___--_ :■i tr■ 1• 000Cn 40 urnanderint 00000 T LAND USE ELEMENT • I....... ■a■:f■■ Single Family �: Commercial y■f..= Low, Density •' Office • / Office Park • Multi-Family • • crry o�= rEIJ-0,;1 : Medium Density °°°°�°° n °°n44nn Public/Quasi-Public rs'd • II N .T1i Multi-Family °°°°°°°' D 0000000 0000000• SEP 1 .:, ". :, High Density Industrial-1 J-5 Multi-Family Light • s rial • BUILDING/ZONING DEpr .' • • • rn`• ' l _ Recreation '•.'•.'•. Heavy Industrial • `� `f' l: Greenbelt ===__= Manufacturing Park '. `4 •�`r ____- / Multiple Option f . . 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 21, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 2, 1987 ! EFC - 071 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-079-87 PROPONENT: MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES P::S. PROJECT TITLE: SOUTH LIND SQUARE PHASE II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 54,250 SQ. FT BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 ACRES IN KOLL BUSINESS CENTER. LOCATION: .S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st SITE AREA: 4.37 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation__ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET jECF - 071 - 87. APPLICATION NO(S) : sA-o79-87 PROPONENT : MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES. P.S. PROJECT TITLE : SOUTH LIND SOUARE PHASE II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A STTF APPRnVAT, Tn rfNGTRTTcm a. ?qn SO. FT. BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE ON 4.37 ACRES rIN KOLL BUSINESS CENTER.' LOCATION : S.E. CORNER LIND AVE. & S.W. 41st TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : El ENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION IL] FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU j 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT I ❑ POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT EIOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED I�N WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT B1Y 5: 00 P .M, ON nrWMPP 9 1 QR7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : LIAPPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Fnrm 182 , I --I I I 5 4 J ' I— I i -— 1 I I , I _-_--._ I _—__- 1 —� \ _ _ I --- S. W. 34TH STREE I w 1 I ) MP � 8 9 I -- -- 1 / , w � I : 9i? / . 7 //' J sW 30..1 sr 4 >: /// 1 Jp _7 _I, . 5 k ul - S. W. 4/ST STREET 501b7eGt 7 64 �I/ VALLEY Gi SITE I HOSP ' ,,. 1—p \I. rev. : 3 5 / , 11 , NI ] 2 3 B-I . ''`UD " r ..,MktA, , +"" ,." t., .ii .y x.... :`t. :x .« }2t ta".0 '..,,ft 5,. CITY OF ka 4T / / ,' ,., /: • 11 1 a PI Ill '-' /I ' 0,:/,' , /// , SOUTH LIND SQUARE-PHASE II 41P > SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-079-87 APPLICANT MACKENZIE/SAITO ASSOCIATES, P.S. TOTAL AREA 4.37 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS LIND AVENUE S.W. EXISTING ZONING M-P (MANUFACTURING PARK) EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE PROPOSED BUILDING FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE. (54,250 SQ. FT. ) COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIP OPTION-OFFICE. COMMENTS THE APPLICATION IF FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN APPROVAL. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LIND AVENUE S.W. AND APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET SOUTH OF S.W. 41st STREET.