Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA96-015 61(0—°VS (4) , . STORM DRAINAGE REPORT FOR • — — . - RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER • RENTON, WASHINGTON BY • BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS 2009 MINOR AVENUE EAST SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323-4144 CONTACT : JOHN E. ANDERSON, P.E. BRH JOB NO. 92233 . 02 0V < t ? j • • .0) nEcovED ,r tp itt 1*--40 co • FE 1 6 1996 sq.,• 1IP. • ,r) 25,.i 18 ;;;;,. DEVELOPMENT PLANNIN *-04, CITY OF R 4 ENTON •- — kAtiL44.1- 2_ce—cl \},\ EXPIRES 12/1/97 i ( 'LONGACRES RACE TRACK ) \� - - - - - - / r�t1 cn RFti N T rn °4, -1°>- "- - rn O (••cuFlc AVE s.w " N, 0,— ` /THOMAS AV1 .W. p "f , i RAYMOND AVE S.W. Z Diii Li -0 ! I LJND AVE. S w4 z- i ---111 ,. (VALLEY FREEWAY) ..• STATE SIGN ROUTE 167 Raymond Avenue Center is a 10.39 acre site located at the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Southwest 19th Street and Raymond Avenue South. The proposed development would occur on Parcel B. Development would include the construction of a 99, 900 square foot building and associated parking. A divided driveway would be extended to Raymond Avenue . Spring Brook Creek defines the southern and western boundary of the site. The original easement for Spring Brook Creek did not coincide with the actual stream location. Bush, Roed & Hitchings has prepared a lot line adjustment which defines the easements according to the surveyed location of the stream. Lot lines shown on the documents submitted for site plan and shoreline review reflect the most current survey information. Several years ago, the site was filled to approximately elevation 18 . Fill slopes toe down to the banks of Spring Brook Creek on the southern and western boundary. On the eastern boundary, the fill slopes toe down approximately 60 feet west of the east property line. Areas east of the fill slopes are classified wetlands. A 60 inch culvert discharges into a ditch on the west side of Raymond Avenue . The ditch is located within the 19th Street right-of-way just north of the north property line. Existing drainage maps indicate the area tributary to the ditch include Panther Creek Wetlands . From the 60 inch culvert, the ditch flows west to Spring Brook Creek. Existing grades on the developable areas are approximately 9 to 10 feet higher than surrounding grades . The ground surface where the proposed development will occur is flat . Tall grasses cover the area. There are no significant tree located within the buildable area. Storm water run-off from the site sheet flows to the surrounding low lands . No defined drainage courses were observed on the site . The proposed site plan maintains a minimum 50 foot setback from Spring Brook Creek and a 25 foot setback from the surrounding wetlands . In most areas the proposed development exceeds the minimum setback requirements . Storm water run-off from the developed areas south of the building will sheet flow across the asphaltic concrete paving to three curb breaks . From the curb breaks the storm water flows into biofiltration swales . Areas north of the building will sheet flow to catch basins . From the catch basins the storm water is tightlined to a biofiltration swale . According to the design standards, a single 200 foot long biofiltration swale would be adequate . Using four, 200 foot long biofiltration swales will provide a significantly higher water quality than required by the design standards . A wetpond is required because the development is located next to Spring Brook Creek and has more than one acre of impervious surface area subject to vehicular traffic. Also, since the storm water will discharge into Spring Brook Creek the detention volume will be calculated using Department of Fisheries guidelines . These standards require a peak discharge rate from the detention system equal to 1/2 the pre-developed 2 year rate for a 10 year developed storm inflow. Peak discharge rates from the detention system for storm events greater than the 10 year can match pre-developed peak rates for the same storm event . Analysis of the combine wetpond/detention pond shows that it performs significantly better than the Department of Fisheries guidelines . Initial sizing was base on maximizing the available area. The goal was to make the detention volume shallow. This would prevent storm water from backing into the biofiltration swales . By making the detention volume shallow, there is not sufficient head pressure to reach the pre-developed 25 year and 100 year peak discharge rates . The calculations show the developed 25 year storm will be discharges at approximately 1/2 the pre- developed 10 year peak rate and the developed 100 year storm discharges at less than the pre-developed 10 year peak rate. Therefore, development of this site would reduce the peak rates for all storm events . Volume provided by the wetpond exceeds the required volume by approximately a factor of three. This is also a result of maximizing the available area. The design guidelines require a 3 foot minimum depth plus 1 foot of sediment storage. Maintaining the depth requirement across the pond provides a storage volume of approximately 26, 881 cubic feet . The required volume is approximately 8, 116 cubic feet. Therefore, the storm water quality will be significantly better than required by Department of Fisheries guidelines . The additional volume will also mitigate the two small areas filled within the 100 year flood plain. A storage volume of 10, 024 cubic feet is required for compensation. reports/92233 . 02 .-•' ._ .- • ; i i i . --- • -41-- • - • . ;; 1 r. 1 , . i --------1 I . •,--.. 1 -14G-foN, • 1.1 - r----- ' ..•• 12 I 1 .. .. 1 I suR.L . I -----------. - ''..•: I i i_ ___—•-- ______________,,j . --1_-------1. ___ L ___-gral---- ... • _- •__--_.v, • _ *--] _.----------, !.__-.. •--- [ .._..-••• . . ,.. ..„, . . .. . . . . _ _os _•--_, .. ..,•••,-,:_:--J---- ____--..-:-• ., rsco„._--- i ,:-.. ,..i/7- - -, • .. , ... • . . .,. . . • ..„--:3-01-5"--- c___---. .__- • 1 1 i _••••••,-,.. i--- 0 -_-___--- ,.... ___ ..../, . .,• . • !.. ...._ , • ,_ ,,, ol-_---, .• __, ./ . ____,, _ •— . _____, ,.._--- WS 1 -'-' '. ' Culvert .---_______.--- ----------- ® 0 --'-- - ---- -- — , . ..... i . ".„..... • _ -..- E j 9 R M333 c4 ._ ... N . , • .....r,r, --- - " ,. ., . • . • - -.:- • -•.....• - ii -... -..... n 1 . • •. - 1.1.. I 1' . • , . ...:.4;:,:.....-' P•' :.. +..,' • '''• . i'''''...g Y.'.!,)';:!?.:.'t....;;;41.-..:,' '. .• • --.' 'v I I ...', :7 RM334 R • 0 ,:...:.., ....:,...,,.----....i... ..„..,..,,.,.: .:,•• .. ....,..-..,.:„.:. .:,..-. ..:.,..; .. •-;,.... ,-:...,.. •:-. ••-•,,s.1.1--=...• . w ,> • ...,....:.• .:-.... ' ...-..,. ,i....• .--,-4.e.) ....,---.::.. 1 . •.- ..: • -. ... ..: . 16 - • • ro ZONE X .;...;,;),.:. ...,!.•:•••:•4 , . .• -• .7:., i •,••11-•: ,'.. 1 -A W.-A ' • rg P ...... .. • . . . ,. .... . . .•...... ..... • . .. I> - . ..,...,-....,.• 1 ...... .., . . • ,„:...„... .........,.:„.•.......,;:•-• ...„.•::‘...„L..-.,..,..._.:__....„..„...;_„..... _....._. : . . . ..., . . .. .....„ . • ...: . ,, ..,....„ . .• ___ _ • • ..., • .• .. . • . . ......,.: .. • • ... •. •• _ ......... . •• • . .. .. ......• .•. . ... ... . • . . .-.„..... ,.. . .. . .: ••• . ..._ •. ..• :• . . • . . . . ... .. . :• • . . • . .. . .... . •.•. .... . .• .. : . ... - .... ••• • • • , • .... . . . . .. .• • • . . • . . .. • . •. . • _ •. . , . .. . . . . . ... . . . .. . .. .. . .. . . . . . •. . . . . . __ ..• . ... .. .. . . •• .. . ... . . . , .......HtE I • ' , — ‘. • ., . 7--"'• • : I ,,j• ., .. . . • • • • • - - • • A ..,•••'• 1 * . . ..., • . . .. .. • ZONE X • . .. .1,- .j.:. -. 1 -,•• • • • - 1 ' • ', • . i --. • ',. :. ..: .! . ' I - - - . • • . , .. ., .. • • • - --- . , . , • .. .. , — • • . . . . . • .::•;:•1.-s,-• •:F..„. i.-:.... .• • . •. .. . ..:. .- '''••• • ..'. •,.'.• ..;:.-•.7;••,•-1., . • . . • . •:.•-: •',.'.'. •'•• ,-... , • ••••• • , —.)-•,:.-1.: ,. . . • .. . . . ..,. .• . • . .• • J"..'• .,.*:•A • , • ). ',.-:,:..",s:::.; .. •..--'„) •-•-•-1."•-• •!• : ...../ • :• ••::• • • • - .% . ';.:1. .:I. "•' -•• • 1.4.:....:, :••,•;...,IL:'..f7t::.!"- -•.::.., . .. ...... . . . ..-, ". — -. : . ...: . .. .. t...... . • - .. • • • ' ....'''...j.......;.t,I4'.... .....4... ',.7...I,,"..1'.' . .. . . . .. . • . . .., . ... .•. . . ..., . ..• .. . • . • . ,......• ,:::1•,....•::::-.': ,...'''' • . '..•' . '.......'n,......... ... - ••,.::; .. .`:....7:4 q .. .-,?-...-?.-•:-A,--",•tr.' ---.: - •...••"1.•-•-••f•::;-.,i•-r,••- . 4.,:.,.-.•.1: _, •,•:::: •--.:,...":._. - . .' :.,''....:•• '::::::...•,;::),. :, -. .. . .,.:...,..,,,, .. . .1 .• . . ,.• — •••• • -• • . . ..--,. . • .. • ,...... • . '''.. .. ' • 7 ..--' :-.:.t.. :::-:.-.1-:-•••:.•::.. "::::•1-.•:••;;Y:--•,...f. . • .. - . •-•••s‘•, • ,..;:...4.1 .'s•-:-•;:.•• -:,. •;,•:‘:: i,‘.- ;a: z o N E x ZONE ''-. ••••• . *. • ..... •' :.•...;!*:::.:..-;•. ....: ''-...•':'•''';;:.:.'::. . '. '''"•,.. .'•:::;:-1,1., :.;.•,-:',:ij,1..•:.•:•'...; `•''.;,•-'6';':i''.- ... • • .`-'..")•::-:, , :. ...:,-.. : . :•••• . - . • ':• '...: ,-.;•• ':,•-•';'-.1;* -i•-• . -:. ,3.•.'','i.-'..'1- • . I I I I • X • . . • ••.- • ••!.:••.',..:::.• .,,...:•.:': .•-,•'.'.-...:-.,-. ,.". .:• .-•.:•;r,..:-.•••:.1:-. if;,-.:-;.‘''....1' ..---.....': .•-: .-':.:•i..'• :::-.)'::. ;- ..--- : ; , 1 ' •:. •:-...3.- ••• '•'-..•':::d.., ‘E.-....,•,-,,,-:'../....•••••• .•••.;;.::?„-,•,',':...-•.-.-:•••,,..,:;•'••• .'-,Ii.., 4..:, .,.,•••;:.,,-;:,:...-.,•,-;........,; •:,;:.•1--'..• ,..- : ...• ..• ••. -, • ...-: -...:;::.i.:-.., '..,.• ......:c••,.: .7,-..-.'.' ,..:..;,.., •••-•,:•.-:-1....,..;-•-•,':',.... . .•.! . .r,-*,••;3•.,-;,;::,,,?:li,.-.i,;.,,,-.-,,.I.......,., ,,:-.....,.,;..i,,,;.,-,,,,:::?:::,..!....-,:•.,.,;:,..,::f.......z..:';:::;::::,.R;...;:t!..-.. „."i;-, Z ` . ,'Fiisi::!..0.:'2:1•.',-.1',.0•••,..••- — - • . ' ., .. ....., •',::.:•,-.,......:„...,•,..;,•,!:‘..".•.•.„'?..• .., :.";:',:.;.,. ••,%;,..::,-•.'A 1..*:..•:::-...;I.:,•;.:•••'.., ,,,,,:',';'.,-.:- :'•.:•,.•••,•;!•.•:',••.:1`..,:z.:.,;1:;,.....V`'.'g'.-:!•;..1';• 'F '"•2••;'.`\,,'..". •. ...... .. . •-,. •—.-.:,:-..,:••; .. •••,;:,-,...• -,. .—-,1:- •••••,. ...; •••••-•,-• :..;', ';',;i.::•:;•::::',:,••.:-•..:r,.,:i;'.•;:;;";:',i''''.:.'%';'•"••'..'...*.•,t-r•i•!•-.',I,!••.1.,''.••''•:__. 1 !* •••• ••• --1•':•:::••'' s.•••••,•••":.•:".•''':'-';'''',';;••••••' . 11 1 I (°.;1) I • ' '..'.1.• ••'-'JI•=.",,,-`,,,,•'''i'-.1'•:•;.;:.-;•...c,...,-;.:;',..' 1 ; ! I ...'-:.": .,.-..:- : ...• .. ::. •-. ,•'...,;•";''.....:14'!-.,•1,',•:••;•••;;'''••'*`:,•;;;•••••:::' • i IIN-1ON ; I 1 I , I DO YEI\IZ" Vwor2 . , • • . . • 1 • • . , 1 :088 I 1 ''• z.vAi-ripki — 1‘ •• • • . ./• 1 . , ,.. ,______ I i 1 BRIDGE UNDER q_3) . . . _ CONSIRUCI ION • , . • • sloD) . • . ! :o ! . ' 10 • • • --,, . RM338 -.T. iirs-r -• - ----27TH ' 11111111.1. L___S°"4 --'------• - r•mt-e-r• FILL V1 im I ti .I co YR " FLaop • TorPL IVZ .. l• I ° r L Z4 GF / /� ll ti'ti : `° 1 8, ,�/' �. • ,yti`,,,I = 8.40 1 CURB //� l� , f� / 13 BREAK ot / ./ � /i r / • , / IE0 Kti -. 0, / / / $ 12 ---._ 1 I - 10. W • 19.=• • \... ,i�1N,A ;, • .. Ivo: , . .. ._ -.- . —_ 441.:A(�� SS MH s , � 14 o,s TE19.00+ •`i4‘ ;4rsz� . : EXIST. SS MH IE-11.28 .,,� �P.\!g I IE 1T. S SS p 4 � '��' TH A N U E = / 1 TE= • 8 CH EX GR '- y IV. . SEWER RAY),1• AVENUE S IE 1 •ry , 8 SAN/ IE-10.•. — — — KING COUNTY, W ASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1C 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS \ ii...dsvitair 4eur ..‘ . 74:ay • • . . . . %v. i wiA- , /4 "Rill i 41-alk ATI lho'S • . ig gialr: illorimitir 111‘, 1 10 - ismri Novax..4-ili 'is, ,„,, ., /1 Argirog, . -vac% C! -..guia...2116 - i - , /grill likitNIAi ' • le 1411"aSir ' --'i rojkaireviiij . i .1. , • 1 \ /\r-irttltttill -t.,*;ie . kir-illai ..r1r011101144 Illif 7 %,., i . ) ,•I 4::. 2Q itittiou i'" - ',Pei IIIIXF.7.,,Aiiii. A f ' No ifiSi \ — e„,.., Vit..247. 7.11=1V111111 // A 0, %ilk . i Al . •.i ... plithe.,. itiOt-fpxsiu.---- 40.0s 4' III 'rah i t -3„,ii FY VII',...91,114. ,111 -iall 411r.h. lilitaliiii)ii I i )) ' ilk I (10 1 4.61111- r 4 .a*-4f el iltVr c. ' 7:\k. AkAttrAlt._, _ .,iv-,-►, / itivi ,..„_., - '-'---t wii.4. l' A /1 1-*-= , tumral.k t lopoi —"vs:iv:tot_ /...elaw,Teakm _-,_-_11 b. - _. -.....Ap;,\71., , \ ,ikallr4910,11 'Iti .4‘ _ ... i i.roinoul. 7;-- , MI mp., it Iron• '.-- Q....V4„..0 \ i li VIM \ ''' I=1'`, 11 PANS :_-_110..- A- / --..r. I { ' I\ - %. I Irma itag - 7./.// !: II= ... ... leNmt. 1iIR . . .., , , , I, i ifiligl. ..E'. ' . Ir vit Are RR!f .� .- "liti '1/4 ; - • pupa 1`jcv ._ .--., same A i ) :Jprirtitittillir.‘ci -� __ 1 -7: I gli " .1k . - Ingpikilip-11. , . .r , • - \ 4,. Nr.,_ .ins • • -"°Y-- PZ = 2 , CSC, '� a t l amy if !- ` 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION w�I��`� 1�IN , ..3.4 r' ISOPLUVIALS OF 2-YEAR 24-HOUR �' wr��r -- TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES ir fy , ,! 0 1 2 4 S 6 7 • moss " • `♦♦ N _ _ Se. Sr-�1'1a300,000 3.5.1-8 1/9° 1 - \\ EARINGTON GARDENS: 1 yp �/ I f N NO I VALLEY OFF10E —M—t 9 •- 0I I i' 1 w %.` C PARK �I/ ._ Ip eilll " pi, l ram, � DEING 0 I I COMaPANY I/7� STONEFIENGE y' II..w.®®. S�20I II TD. 4 I ��° e I I ��."IOY � ° I -comoAVOmr i 1 I .,. I I CFHCESOUTH LAATE _ 'LL v ' OFFICE PLAZA 4� ucxr POYSTRIAL / I N1I I _ -0__ __ GLACIER PARK wn.- GLAC-- COMPANY U PARK I I CO OLYMPIC PIPE LINE I© OLYMPIC PPE COMPANY 1E3 LINE CO. v mil,Roo a.irroloos.ix. 0 W. CM OF R^NTON ^ �,NF1COg00 RAN Ems mama MOM CO NO. IWaMs Ns 252304-90 7+08 CITY OFJ ATTLE 647777 WATER 'OEP COUNTY CITY:SLOG . 302305— 007=06 ' CITYAO . RENTON 379700 200; MILL YE SOUTH. RENTON• NA 98055 • • 302305=9066: 04 ' CITY OF : SEA .LE 617777 • . ;a 252304-9037-08 CITY.: 0F, SEATTLE : ' 647777 WATER DEPT . • COUNTY, CITY, BLDG , 252304...9058-.02 ' kOCWHANSGEORGE . 190.139 % -ALLPAK •CONTAINER . 1106 ,SW '27TH . ST • RENTON WA : , "98055 ' • ' '.•• . - • • '"" • . 252304-9064.'04' • RENTON " illL : L C - ' 559999 ._ 5601 -SIXTHIAVENUE : SOUTH . SEATTLE WA- . 98108 . . • .•: • : . . „ . .• 302305-9007-06 CIMOF RENTON . :379700 200 MILL " AVE, SOUTM RENTOWWA 98055 ••, • .. . • • , 302305-9066704 . . " CITT:OF SEATTLE 617777 . , • . „ . _ : 302305-9054-02 OLYMPIC .PIPE -LINE COMPANY 5N0674 . KEVY: KENNETWR • PCLBOX5568 • • DENVERCO 80217 H. .• • •. . :,• „.... , „ , „ 3340404000-07' RENTON INC 1.90072 •C/0- 6SIC ,REALTY:CORP" • • 255 "SHORELINE ' DR STE.'600 REDWOOD • CiTY;CA . . 94065 334040."5300-701 : GROUP -HEALTH : COOP/PUGET ,SND261233 5211.4ALL, ST , SWTLEWA - . . " ' 98121 , • • _',: 4' ..:BA.T CH. •:NUMBER: : . . ' H©: .Seek7 _ •1 ., ,,. *,: 'CUSTOMER ;NAME;: - BUSH,ROEO&HITCHIN ''r : _ • L>l,kit j. 'l_: a yt _ 41. k - _ - .P. J�'+'�'� .I .. 1. ‘, .,... .,...._.: .:..,.....,.. .,,.. , ..... .„ ,,....: :, .. .... "...), : .• ,.. .. , ,:,• ...,..,,,.,,.... . .•,.... ..... .• . ., : , ., ..:•,...,,,,.....,•....:. .••i•,.:., ••.'''.1.1*;.-•.'• :--i: '''.:' ‘ ''‘'. '."-' • .:: ,",. ic) " ' s, t'41,,..:., •'.,...--:,.':.,... .. ...,:. : • - :',', •-.-' ...:.:',.,-,1-2.',':,::-.--.;:1:„'; :‘ A.: it.-.. .. .:, - -.--.`.. .. -.....- ::. ] '..,. ..-,-,',::-..',. .. -...-...;.,..,....-..-... ::"....i •„.:"-..t.. ..- ..., :-.-. :.,,,....:::. ,-.. ... • ..,._. .,..,.:.. ,;,..,,,........,....:-..-..., ,..,.,,,,,.i.;.•:,!... . . .. .:...,J-_.....,. . .. ._ ..F. ... .....:.• ,,,,.......,.. :,,..., -;•'-;• ..4..'.'..,.•:' .:::.:...',7.-- ....--:.:.::-..,::-.,..... .. . . '- .... ..• ',1:- -,',...,..;.•..., ,- • -HI .....;...-,...i....,.....-'•,-,.•.. ..::.'........ , ..,;,•• ➢y � r ..:. - .2,- ,,, .,:... ......,. :.,..!......,....:•••••,. ,.. .,., ' .:. ,.:•-•-:;..,......;, . .....•':....'..--,... .•;. .;,:r.F'•:,-..4--. `",;".,,,••'. :-. - ,•:: ,...--,..,,''."'",.%--,••••••.z.'''•'•''-2_ • 252304-9019-0 :' ••CITY..'OF ;R :ENT N '209800 • :CITY>HALL" . :. ., 200. MILL . AVE.,: OUTH.. RENTON : WA gancc COMMENTS 154 ?.. 000580-0001-07 THE BOEING COMPANY 530653 . PO BOX 3707 M/S 1F-09 SEATTLE WA 98124 • 192305-9013-03 STONEHENGE II LIMITED 229800 PARTNERSHIP 3605 132ND AVE SE SUITE 300 ' BELLEVUE WA 98006 • 192305-9076-07 SOUTHGATE OFFICE PLAZA I 913335 , LIMITED PRTNRSHP 3605 = 132ND' AVE SE 4300 SEATTLE WA 98006 192305-9095-04 STONEHENGE . III LIMITED . 229800 PARTNERSHIP 3605 132ND AVE SE SUITE 300 BELLE VUE .WA 98006 242304-9020-08 WINMAR CO INC ' 2N0425 PO BOX.: 21545 SEATTLE WA 98111 242304-9022-06 THE BOEING COMPANY • 530653 PO BOX 3707 M/S IF-09 SEATTLELWA 98124 ' 242304.-91157.04 WINMAR , C0 INC 2N0425 PO BOX 21545 SEATTLE WA 98111 252304-9019-00 CITY OF RENTON 209800 CITY' HALL 200 MILL AVE SOUTH . RFNITIN WA , faAncg vICINTIT MAP to 777 i444 4 Az.. c.i...... — i I --- ....., , , , , • , --Ar—T— g Rl . ,., . .. , ... , ,' • WETLAND /, , . 'long ATEOITOT-Or---1- , r ( ,..n-W--- , 1'' ,) : 7 ,,A - PARCEL L,4 . „,.:5„.:0,-- . . • 77.--------------, ---.;..,j1'-'-:.. -- '.-S,, f-;-----"'" '•' - II1 ,' ,,.. , _i__ I- , , . -' „- ' ....-,„...zw:,T2`..-, \' , . „ . ...4/ -''"7`41:Zi-',\ \\ III , I- •. „ tz)9 _I K i—— ,• .,-------)--- ci-§ • L_AL ‘' '",-- \ —0.g z - 1 ,, ., ,„ ,„.-/„,,,,, ,r,,,,,, y,...... __ _,,, - I • / i'l g?.1,:gi''/ .' AIK -,.' , %... ".,.. . ''‘‘s k ''>,. WSW•EI.Ev.430 n',:-.'Sk •,-'''S' ; 1' , // / / . Ai ".'•' \ R.,,,, --- ._ n,,,. 1 1 El 1 ;:ii g .. 91E / .. / ,•„. - - --,-,„:--- ___,,. --- ---- -.7.;------- ...... ,......----"" ..,.. ...--4 / A' 4 -' - • ,..," -4, c3-----------_-_z-,%--,;!--4_,_ _ -, %,,..t.t., -..-------,, , KEAN il0i.lid.;4TIER i „,e 7 ' -'-',•' 1".1'..r-'-------=.:._---- --------...' -•---_--- -- -- - --.. --------- Of MR(•ELEV.4.5, , \' -r , // t/in PROPOW DISTRIONTION — •3____ .-.'""" • I • ,• !WILDING ..--- ...-.------' i'..1,14,11: ''1 ?--1 i •. / a .•• ef Wa DR 4.7' '- ---t __ __,____--_„....__----4.I, .,,,, ,"„,i,i. , ._. ,.. AcKNO STALLS •' '\' ‘/‘:1,,,,I :ill :91 6- . vo - .40011111Ma. • •- Wrdik V.I... '') :*// / / 1 AIL' .•- ,a r L 4 • •• ...... , .:'' lalmilimrAIP'llila .111111.iiiiiiiiiii91.111Pliiilliiiiiiiiiiiri:%a r' 1 e'-.---.., FCTfEtrt''' • 6 CO..6,61.K I- ...0: .,6/ to° WETLAND 4,,,' -A'' . • .. . „__-__________1÷1,______________________ hmt. -... . .„./..... 11 .,..' • 6 CO._MK -1 .- • - 8 NTE AREA VA 04129 EOM CV ECM.ROAD DEDDAF,F41....' i N___7 NCB.. 2 x 1 0.1.10 AREA 99.951.. TrFE OF 02012.1.21 v11 EfIEWIERED a SITE PLAN .:-.-.''' i---- CRANED ME WE lil o 5 CCOAFFCY GROW R1.810,0 5 '''' , 2 I — • MING DISIRCT Ma FOLOIRIAL(Li ICE, i 60.101. 4 . _I < ELECTRICAL PM 1.2044.1..41.ARE EOM DEN. i' CODE,WED taS4 UHL • P..1.11.CODE OECKLIST 4,1•0 1.1.045 0.1.TO ea WY CF MENTO12.1.6 WOE 161.19.6118 TO ME CITY CV PENTON FOR A lERANT le Sheet Ill.....T01 WAIF EIJELDHO CODE ItrieOvErIENT PEPTIrr. 1.0.1.16 STA,NO. pl i 5T4100,2D V x IV UN 2'O... g, All - COVALT V a 110 OW V 0.131.44. . P.M00 FROMM 2,8 SM..ll IlL.val.4 1.1.C.AT111.16, 4:4. . . .1 i- I. . PIPELNNE EASEMENT PER—15- WETLAND „B 15.0 REC.NO.589073 i ;- az, PARCEL 5 76. "A" .- • t- e LOT I alma LOT Ma - .J.°• 6 °%"23,. LOT x 9L7 'I /' `mac B0 /1 aJ D\ \Y�$e\. • ORDINARY HIGH WATER , v ,V' a \ J--s ELEVATION= 4.5' / I I I;I \ �\n '.5 7. PLAIN tt\ / i \w e ELEV..16 00 r a _-�• tJ,ap �'\6� ORDINARY HIGH WATER % j: a { ;/ \' lo ELEVATION=4.5' I (j POI ��// , p �' G�:/a',N a,/ s oo n.aD I �\x N vim` w .0. z 'W OQ�i! ¢.N.�— 1 1660 125D____ .a__3 w__ — Z 1 \ •�s.� N ,��.w� /'• Rn` } %/,� IE-fAW \ \\ J" \\\ tOM1 W CWlll¢ / 20.9, 12.00 Of'-'T\ . \• 21.... \9'4s e I __ ) \\ ,� Yf �.\ E ilia so a=se'n3'WI r1y 3' --( — g [012b(.a 1 / w/ i. / zo.ss � \ \\\ `` re _ , Sao////! • 1. I PER Nc AGE DITCH NO..e.SE MENT j' 0.95 - Tr`tee•w �� `w� O 0 y6 sae JL� ` `I /i // FINISH FLOOR = 21.00 20.9 • .,.:o. —1z• $••! __IE_14� �� 90 �32• �!-- I I 3 01E rETPCNO EN POND / -re-man / A 19.J5 10.111.13, METER „ w1) a =` _ -'`" = / 1 W el wimlTOP Or of�iTm,.a.n ii`.a060D 8. 815�, A C E L rwet _ z.,= ®_-_ �- . L„ I .1: II 'TI aar m6110x-a 10"' • PS.0//• - / ••J -- 20.9oo tfl45 �O` `J //ft I 19.90 Oa_ ca 19.J0 _ I �. 1 reel. 20.95 IE"a61 20.95 ¢.,3.i120.95 IE�,i.95 IE,SN 20.J0 `0 I 4 .�->b -!___ • \rz'1... %/,�/ 19.601 20.95 1 1E tB.6o — [a t IE y'_12'Sp— \ I y a13 20.J0 1¢_lsao m_r— ___ ___ • .3 i. ( /0 soi--- 1z•so- �1z sD— 12• pillim i M�r��II ==H 1 I, /I n ,9. _!s - -sroE-aim e' / na�4^ .j,/ /- - r 20.70 w.- .,nEu�l{SS 11N • Al I I AC WETUND BUFFER ae — -aEEr,,.::- -..- LIg ant 8 s, ...1. ;w //1 • WETLAND „A'. 1 ~ ; �' >r 1320 3v • ` —__I e cow-VW x INSTALL 325'E 12• I — DI WATERLINE EXTEND TO EXISTING o�p0/r , i I ( SEAL �F I Vag �I \ ra BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. I� ML C ENCANEERS&LAND SURVLTTMS N. A Bali MD AVE. (zee)3E3-nw SEW.n[ ano, • feC CITY OF RENTON \ .•',OatI DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS GRAPHIC SCALE Ia/1. SCHEMATIC GRADING&UTILITIES �,1� ,>_ RAYMOND CENTER '° '°° RENTON WASHINGTON or — MOM RIIMIMIIMMIRNMENINI _ ..... m Pa NAND rz air • nN w) WO _ ___ .__.._. _..___.� N- K oauEu G AMER'w re Pu wu 90 PENNON 00 wvN O.L,E 02950 Tu 91EE,. 1 OD I ` 4 I 144..t..%.h ,ones,r �, •K.. �* `.� • I 1 o a1�4�4��il"`. SoR�Y ' }am t ? A! C '.aye � . I 1� it 6� • 1 j ; ro 04. ``\ i 1 v v I I m v. • \ 4 I , \ `'\ r I I p /: ` S. 1 H o \ , \q ., I 1 Q ; 8r ee l ' i ¢ 1 ' z i I i • I ._��_.. __83 / • .w . Y 1‘1,1 ;o 'p,,•> E 4 D i ,- �+ - 1 I �I`°I ::,z i+ 1 4.' lie ,0,4.,' j1 .-'.`.� . , ' ' 1 ilk ®® 1 1 at Q . i I aI r 1: °E I;` D I— I (" m 1 2 aD d 0 r I I 1 �m I •� 1 MAR tt T I , N ..,.. in r D D '} s ', , I z , 1 ' 1 , 1 1 , , I y L, Ian a: ``, \1, ••�.. , Ili 51 , ,. 1 a _— �\\ -T ._..it c MVO.a 7; -, `t-' --- t.`� 1\• L SW „19TH STREET n•:,..:• — gg ___ 1e 1bn_� .so�n�_� S • SITE PLAN RA1'MOND AVE. CENTER lob no. 1 , s LANCE MUELLER ■ ASSOCIATES \� = RA7HOND AVE.SILL/S.W.19iH STREET L mo drawn REtyTON, WASNINGTON eM000l i • MC w I r ■ o T • • • 1 • m�lwia chocked 1 130 LAKESIDE• SEATTLE.WA 95122 • 206 329 266 �VF10f® 3 >x OFLLS NORT ST LLC U8/5e .. .. dote no. rertelon . doh N I j1Li ' / q 2 6 \ C.J. HHLL hAINIS I IQA �, \ EARING-ON GARDENS, I '\DD. V. NO. I ,` mommmi VALLEY OFFICE —�— SIT �i 1 \ c-o �I� T�. 1 PARK I Ii I I , =m1 S c_o /' r / —y_ TAX lOT Y2Gt�049XflO I•C31• r,�ex TAX LOT A33404.4000-0 ./ s ,i LOCATION MAP �_�_$ SfJBfra00' _— . - S. 19th ST. , \ TAX LOT/D2305-90O-0 c-o / , Q, I� C-O I A BOEIING , a 'V I COMPANY G`O/'T LO f S 1 i / tUc il d H NE 9 $ d 11 _f0, =Q, I TAX LOT 00009pg00AO CO TE r I / 1� l ct A co I I / I-L TAX LOT MS230S90TE-0 zC-0-C AL/OB E Tr? r I A Ha-HEAW/NDUSTRIAL U / I g \ TAX LOT nu�49020-0 OY Y ICE PLAZA I-L-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL /i�i C_D ... , . I- • GLACIER PARK I I GLACIER COM PAN Y PARKN_I I. 'I H-I • - - U CO OLYMPIC PIPE LINE 1 OLYMPIC PIPE ' COMPANY I,.1 LINE CO. sr . if ISO F,AN.L' . 0 BUSH. ROm a HUTCHINGS. INC. . O,t. ri 1� rra A.CML XR 75 Is LAND SUFPRIORS � Xunr...IROaR CITY OF RENTON t/n/t. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIICs.WIORKKS +r1 .y. NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN FON GM JOB 1112233 MINN CO.NC. 99.WPG Mm 03/DA/95 ro XAX 92233.00 • X,�wPG JEA rJll wm s .0 .DWW ST .KR. XIS .PW0l00 ....+v........n XCTCOI OT 5 I • 0 0 0 Q Q Q O O 1 77T- 1 k .' II'I I I I( i Ij I{ fi 1 w I 1 Y 4. , ----f-- -_-H-4 _�-i i , O� I __-1.-_ I -�----— 1 4 o I b I� I I q� tt ao 1 I t 70 -_...-r -1----1--------- fir \ \ 11 \ It. • rai11G vex:aa!s:.kssnas a -V FLOOR PLAN RAPT IOND AVE. CENTER lob no. LANDS MUOLl00 0 A090CIAT09 a RAYMOND AVE.S.W.<SW.MTH STREET "° ��ORD E l RENTON, WASHINGTON �y�y R drown __ • n e N I T E e TO . AIA L✓atwrw� checked 130 LAKESIDE• SGTTLE,WA 90122 • 206 325 2353 cBYY�flo� S NORTHWEST LI.Cr �-� ,�y„ . dab no. revision dab Ill ® o i . o --o ' I. . IIIIIIIII" . o .11111flll:: •---o Mil:: IIiI0I:: 1101II" o ]INIIBI:: _0 II'I1I"' I II II 1IGIDI'. - - o i.uuli= ---o ;III�IUI.: —o e I II II ;IIIllull!' ®il!l .-o_ .IIIIIIIII — ;IIIIIIIII116 ° - -__._ IIiIMI.1U e I Ill ll Ellin 0I1II - - o ___o ;11IIIIIII:: ;N1 ' —0 e III !Ill I o o —o D bZ o ; III . ____,±..__, $ 2- uI 2 . 1 —O 1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS ,♦e, 1. CENTER LANCE YUE LL8i1 I A990DIATEt RAYMOND AVE. Allm ob no. tR i RAYMOND AVE S.I.U.1 S1LL 19TH STREET dwrn W R£NTON, W4SHPIGTON A • e H I T t e I • • Al * DEVELOPED a�� chocked 130 LAKESIDE• SEA2TLEI7W0k 98122 • Sot 323 2533 :. BYOFUJ NORTHIIEST LLG �vw - --_'--- _•_ s • Lj' ,h I*,•• M1,I .t ta• f�u i °P'7�•;3.Y.'d'' �!r°p 7• ,+i"r' -Ai,' 3✓,•y,`ajd �'<•f.+..,.,,a; ,y.' `ti`.r�.r.�,�a•.y^P C...,.�, ;,1.°.sf' �,�I 4 Lk 9 74—c,�Ai,' >0 ''''e �,'" ' �:; =14 /4? �.� F'FYF4soa-„y ,,4 J Y s's4z iiii ' e?5.w.;: ,It..s,.". t :LYE-14i, .thIT, . •1•;,.-, ,,,t'- „�l'I t$3tlftl2Ti i.JidQ. ' ' . ,a t ,U .,>. ., ,t1. ,,,: `,%,' :X t>',• L 24Z..r:1:�r 7E6". tD'8'+al F+�, .sn ot%r. .:.K$ I > !;:!�� T, ,'��'�"` �h".. t•': � f.. �f`sue,, ' a, K. V n� 1 O:a Y �v:��t.l, _G�__.a.Y ,gip 5 �. .?S•,a"4i .S'^ '=Yam$.3.�'�,.'�^v'.•��i:��ia',-s,{��•c3��.,.,�.sm.,•'>,'nf�'.`..#� ','L��en��'c '�'.S��tA'�raxr >r.� �3 e KLNa>:cdaC,.. +�.-. o!➢��e '~.g`,,`-c'v?�� :("s.'x =`<"I��l �u7 `'4`'�^'�� r�i,�,, .�? 'a�}�(».?.,:,��,,,.,,=%. ,L-^z�y� �a y�:7,,,x;,•�r R. tom..-,,.+•-n�'n. • ., ,�:h :!4Y4:f! _ .',(t 5;1t{±�lfi,$:tiM,; q' r3-"n-;< �;x. • " .,'i .`.'Y i7`{.`�'':. k: •:�1.',211 ',:f.„y 4;p.LL ...y.n,�Y�V, .,d••,:,. 'h6�•.••Y10" �7!J 81� 9N "'k• ram^, ,j�. �0,:>=� =4 ,0�'.�>�, ,'Tr ?^Y - .Y '�!^ � ti,. ,l ,W,‘ ,its. ..t. .., $1: ,...1bG,�'• ,.,. "fit. �k t..=�t:'t;.`.�"r.., , .,. :x". •,,-.�,. H £.�b:l� .n F,e.. x L ,, ... -_s.«�i:^aYl;!J^.�..�;i..,...� n I.d'�:�'£��,.....i".?��:._.^�`.:JS:,... .....,n. .. .�... ...•. ,..,,e',aii!�I�Y:.:,c.FC�D.�11?Ya�,1[lF W n/vf:*` : ,. ,.�'r...i4. r*•J r..' H ,v,A, I.s f':.,� .,rs':n•, ,.gr. .,a, _ .. , (C-1 . . :.: 1,v24...64,,,,,,i..40,,,,,;;J,.-,...-..:,.:-; • . . . .4/ • i i/ •• 'Y au , I ..VItp \ I� ,,} "S"• „ _ {{ , , e D v,,,,,rzzo3,1git..i,..i.:.,::..]:,„„:. ...•• "./... . ci.....)•,,--k . •..,..„.„..,,,.,,...‘,,„.....,:.....••:.., .c.: . -;4.);:il: . ......„,,,,,,,,,„,,...„.......,...., . ,....„. , ,., 3,„...„ ., ,....,„:„.„,...„,„,::,,,:.....: . ‹..„.., ,. .i,„...,„. ,.....,..:• •:. • .....„,.. „......., . .. • .. .. • . i„. ,OrtRIN; • •..•�` L .� �,`� Y li ,';> t'9 4 • I 1: I r , - ., ,oN. I I tJ •-:,..,M•t•cb<q... "/ •• ________ , 1 hi .:-,F.- • is ,v.., , 0 • I '.. grill • 1 1L - • - i I 1 t • I • �. "\ • I ,t ::: \� I 1 N. t , I I j :� � u. • L. .s y: ,, • ` •IL. • • '" \\; • \ � li It \ uuuluuu '''' Z' -;.' i • • • .,, \'',..., "•%:,;•,,..,. • .4,y.:gol....:,\ -r' f:.r'i`""^yfs/1il•i'''A'J•F!. • • • .;•••::::,.. ..,:z• ,.. 1... ....... ~u it. 1, `I TI I �.. II • I;. .a1' 1,• ; ��, I I'Iu' ti • �_ IIJ ..s�`�,�%✓ ,�� IcnIiui1itijr 141t, . ;''' . 1:7;1611.•;:',.. a ,, r €• o • lil Ilk : Rif y;�� ¢ t.Iji s 1 fit. f. i r1 [ - 1 � BETE 1s ..... i' . _ 4. i.::.. I �1 :% lfir: as pi ' i A 1i • I , JII 1 • I jII 1 I I 1 • •I LANDSCAPE_ . _ _ _ __LANDSCAPE f1A7CHLINE \l imp . " MATCNLINE 1 �� ;�' :,r 4 .i 1.1-11 L l ;I I I i I•..11 •:i.-1 j.+_,- _+ I l eti I nm t' •ws • fro, J . • q''''41Iiil 1 11 • • T''A1 jll 1-*•-•1-•- ,:.,•!-,.••••.a y ',_ �. 10 11 fr:\:tv ii:: . • ., i i,„ 1 1. , ,, ,.. •t• •, k. ,_.,.„ • , . • V`.. - . 51 tt, . k, ,: •: , • ,cfh vs R, • ri 1 • • • ' dIT I! I S' �• p`k1' ill" (' \ } W;• t I. • II• nA \ Or I' •yr, �;'r �� t .4101. 4,,, ';! t ,V1 '•:,•'•••-•: ..-;• 1 —I _yirs� 11 r J^� - S Z /xq I y C - ci In r Z ,,.I I�' .I 1 a • NORTH LANDSCAPE PLAN RA1'1"IOND AVE. CENTER Icb^c• • g, LANCE MUELLER S ASSOCIATES �•' '•} r _ RAmorrD AVE.S.W. sou.19TF1 STREET ' a "� - I]J RENTay WASHINGTCN "_.;. :,:1,. N A . c N I T ■ c T • • A I A Dt�'IIA'm ch•ckad ".'.".;�;;\'.l' 130 LAKESIDE• SEATTLE. WA 98122 • 208 325 2553 BY O�JS NORTFUE$T LLC V"� do•h�9U SO. :,nv(floii'�;�( ,.�+j;aU�/ 1 • • • [TY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Printed: 07-10-2001 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA96-015, 3Pr Payment Made: 07/10/2001 10:16 AM Receipt Number: R0104005 Total Payment: 3,031.30 Payee: OPUS NORTHWEST Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits 3, 031.30 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 085476 3, 031.30 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee .00 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review .00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat .00 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD .00 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone .00 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Special Permit Fees .00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees .00 5023 000.345.81.00.0020 Other Misc Planning/Zone .00 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341. 60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits .00 5955 000.05.519. 90.42.1 Postage .00 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00 Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 CITY ' RENTON ..{L Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor - m Gregg Zimmerman P.E:,Administrator. November 22,2000,= • Ms:Lindsay Herrell Opus Northwest,L.L.C. 915. 118th Avenue SE, Suite 300 Bellevue,WA 98005 : - SUBJECT: PLANTING PLAN FOR SPRINGBROOK INDUSTRIAL PARK (FILE NO.LUA 96-015,SA,SM,ECF=RAYMOND.AVE CTR:II) • • Dear Ms.Herrell: I have reviewed the proposed Landscape Planting Plan(dated October 12,2000) submitted for Springbrook Industrial Park. Main Street Design has proposed to add a total of 70 Spirea - douglasii (Western spirea)within the wetland buffer to;replace dead and dying shrubs.:Fifty of the plants would be installed within the wetland buffer located on the east portion of the site. An additional 10 Spirea would be installed at the north end of the site, and 10 would be installed along the south end of the site. All of the;plants would be two gallon, and planting pits will be a minimum of three times the size of the rootball and backfilled with imported soil.. The proposal to replace dead and dying•plant:material in the wetland. buffer is approved. Please • contact me upon completion of the installation,`so that aninspection of the installation can occur. •I can be reached at(425)430-7286. Sincerely, q.^ . Jennifer Toth Henning Principal Planner cc:, File" Terra Whareham,Opus Northwest • S\f)FVFT Op sF.R\r)Rv&Pr,AN INC\JTH\springbrook letter.doc\cor • - 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 This oaoer contains 50%recycled material.20%'post consumer - Op rthwest,L.L.C. ! OPUS® 915-118th Avenue SE Suite 300 Bellevue,WA 98005 425-453-4100 Fax 425-453-1712 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON October 17, 2000 OCT 1. 8 2000 RECEIVE Jennifer Toth Henning Senior Planner City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Planting plan for Springbrook Industrial Park Renton, WA Dear Ms. Henning, Enclosed you will find the proposed planting plan for Springbrook Industrial Park per your request at our October 10th site visit. This document is for your review and approval. Please respond in writing to Terra Whareham at Opus Northwest,L.L.C., and do not hesitate to contact me with any questions at(425) 519-6842. Thank you for your continued time and help. Sincerely, Opus Northwest,L.L.C. . clieview Lindsay errell Real Estate Intern Enclosure cc: Terra Whareham, Opus Northwest • • Opus Northwest,L.L.C.is an affiliate of the Opus Group of Companies—Architects,Contractors,Developers Atlanta,Austin,Chicago,Columbus,Dallas,Denver,Ft.Lauderdale,Houston,Indianapolis,Kansas City,Miami,Milwaukee,Minneapolis,Orange County,Orlando, Pensacola,Philadelphia,Phoenix,Portland,Sacramento,San Francisco,Seattle,Tampa,Washington D.C. INO-1And /214Fr- All dad dteicvl rinaPed at-Jai 1q71.0 Guirn MA to tyiiz Lpri-GR ad PO' 7-.01-4/ /Tge7; irAN9717/-70 i7H- Aid/ A m// 79i/in toze rwt-00,// 4?2:,%1/ • /944 X/7-/-2 //77 /---rr-d 7pai€4 /j4f&-Aw7d Por-P-T/P 0 z wz * -,P*e el %e 6''?; z • Ala Padd, _ PGrle/Rii pyr&A 11a7 . _M4/fail& 1,frpFR- 7? i 1e4,4 / ) fiv-x - MAIN STREET DESIGN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 110 Third Avenue N. • Edmonds, Washington 98020 /r9 gaarn w-(2-,z90 r:r" CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 24, 1997 TO: Larry Warren FROM: Gregg Zimmerman 6 SUBJECT: Opus Northwest Correction of Drainage Channel Easement This memo is to record my understanding as to your approval as to legal form of the Drainage Channel Easement amendment. On December 24, 1997 I read this amendment to you over the phone and we discussed the provisions. In response to your questions,Tom Boyns has stated in the attached memo that we feel the survey is correct in all respects. We also feel confident that the National Resource Conservation Service will be supportive of the revisions to .the channel that will be necessitated by the encroachment of the emergency access road. Thank you. • cc: Ron Straka Scott Woodbury Torn Boyar H:\W W6ODOTWEMO.DOT\bh • • • • CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 23, 1997 TO: Gregg Zimmerman FROM: Tom Boyns, X 6209 SUBJECT: OPUS NORTHWEST ISSUE SPRINGBROOK INDUSTRIAL CENTER We have been requested by Deborah Berg, attorney for Opus, of Tousley Brain PLLC,to expedite the Mayor's acceptance of the easement amendment and the Agreement to amend the City's drainage channel easement. Both original documents are attached with the record of survey showing the Opus encroachment onto the City easement rights. I have also attached a copy of Larry Warren's memo to us approving the amendment form. He questions the building encroachment issue which is addressed to the satisfaction of the Surface Water Utility staff Scott Woodbury and Ron Straka, Supervisor. Opus has provided a copy of their bond for$50,000 as listed in the amendment agreement. We have discussed the issue with Mr. Steadman and believe his survey is clearly correct in all respects. We concur with his belief that the construction staking was done from the monument at the southeast corner of the Opus property as if the monument were the property corner and not offset by 9.69 feet-please refer to page one of the record of.survey. We have reviewed the legal description as requested by Mr.Warren. We have found no error. We have included the original Easement Agreement for the new correct water easement. This form does not require signature by the City. Opus will send a messenger to pick up the entire package to have it recorded. This should be included in the package. The accompanying memo to the Mayor can be modified to suit the purpose. The Mayor may not be available but Wanda Britts has arranged for Kathy Koelker-Wheeler to come in and sign acceptance if necessary. Deborah Berg,or Stephen Day of Tousley Brain will probably call to expedite our handling of this information. Larry Warren reported that he will not be in until Monday which is not early enough to meet Opus'needs. Larry's remaining concerns are over the conditions in the Agreement to Amend Drainage Channel Easement which he has not seen. I have left a full copy for him in his office. 1 CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 23, 1997 TO: Jesse Tanner,Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Tom Boyns SUBJECT: Opus Northwest Correction of Easements ISSUE: Opus Northwest,L.L.C.has contracted to sell their property at SW 19th and Raymond Avenue SW which they recently developed as the Springbrook Industrial Center which must close by the end of 1997. In the process of selling they discovered that several portions of their construction extend into the City's drainage channel easement encroaching on the City's rights,and that the utility easements were offset from their as build locations. This needs to be corrected prior to closing their sale. They have provided correction documentation and requested these documents be accepted on December 24, 1997 so that they can pick them up and have them recorded to clear the title to the property and close their sale. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends accepting the documents,but holding them until the City Attorney can review and approve them at his earliest convenience. BACKGROUND: • Opus granted the City of Renton a drainage channel easement over a fifty foot wide strip of their property along Springbrook Creek in exchange for credit towards their System Development Charges equivalent to their actual cost to relocate their surface water detention system on the site. This overlays a forty foot wide stream buffer within City Code. The construction on the site was misplaced and primarily their Fire Lane encroaches onto the City easement. When the channel improvements are constructed this encroachment could increase project costs if not mitigated. The property is being sold and the Buyer requires this issue to be resolved prior to closing. City staff met with Opus representatives and agreed that appropriate mitigation would include moving some of the encroaching improvements. The Fire lane cannot be moved,therefore the appropriate mitigation is that Opus will design and build a retaining wall to protect the required Fire Lane at Opus December 23, 1997 --' Page 2 • cost. This cost was estimated at$27,000 to$30,000. Opus has agreed to post a bond for$50,000 to ensure that they will perform the mitigation as proposed. Opus retained Hebrank, Steadman&Associates,P.S.professional land surveyors to prepare and record and ALTA survey documenting the encroachments. This survey has been recorded under 971223-9001. CONCLUSION: While there is no guarantee that one surveyor is more correct than another. The material provided by Mr. Steadman clearly indicates that the descriptions presented are correct and can be relied upon. H:\Opus.doc CITY 1F RENTON N> Office of the City Attorney Jesse Tanner,Mayor Lawrence J.Warren Memorandum TO: Tom Boyns, Property Services Supervisor FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney DATE: December 22, 1997 SUBJECT: Opus Northwest Correction of Easements The Easement Replacement Creation and Amendment Agreement p g is approved as to form. Please have the appropriate staff people review the legal descriptions and determine that the placement of the easements is correct this time. I need more details before commenting .on the building encroachment issue. awrenceJ. Warren LJW:tmj T10.11:61 Post Office Box 626 - 100 S. 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (425)255-8678 • _ C ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY ftopary&Lobby St. Paul, Minnesota Insurance A Capital Stock Company CONTRACT BOND Bond No. JY 3740 Know all men by these presents that we, OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. 200 — 112th Ave. NE, Suite 205 Bellevue, Washington 98004 as Principal, and the ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota and duly authorized to transact business in the State of Washington as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue So. Renton, WA 98055 as Obligee, in the sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars and 00/100***************($50,000.00) DOLLARS, for the payment whereof well and truly to be made, the Principal and the Surety bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns,jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. SIGNED, sealed, and dated this 22nd day of December 19 97 WHEREAS the Principal fwo1/1/gUAaihitk/ai hib/'.M"ttiVUlftlf-4dt!4/cbbbM/v/ViiVA/Virf '/ok/aE/akS0 liefritk/A/464/vfik///////////////////////////44//c/f//////////////////////////////////////AN//// 0,11 has agreed to perform: Springbrook Creek Bank Improvements Renton, WA NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if the said Principal shall construct, or have constructed, the improvements herein described and shall save the Obligee harmless from any loss, cost or damage by reason of its failure to complete said Work, then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. Any suit lender this bond mast be instituted before the expiration of one (1) .year from the date of completion and acceptance. • OPUS NORTHWEST, L L C. (Seal) cipal By !/P�6 . /l6r Titk ST. P FIRE AN . RINE INSURANCE COMPANY Attorney-in-fact Bruce N. Telander • At MM,OWLEDGMENT OF PRINCIPAL (Cos--'-3tion) - . %OOS—Ackttowlediroent by Corporation or Aanciation. (Revised I937) Miller-Davis Co..Minneapolis.Minn. estate of WASHINGTO)i t ss. On this day of M 19 'County of ( 1 before me appeared to me personally known, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that he is the of OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. , a corporation, that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation, (If no seai.so state.and strike nut above as to corporate sell) and that said instrument was executed in behalf of Si.id corporation by authority of its Board of Directors ; and that said I ....-- i acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. • I 1 •Xotarll Public ! County, 1 .31y commission cxpii ii•es _— —---— -- . —. '' 'I • 1' . 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENT!OFSURETY • 'I 1 SOTA i 22nd December 19 97 Mate Of ,ss. On this i day of County of �1 }?TN before me appeared! i Bruce N. Telander • to me personally known, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that he is the Attorney-in-Fact o f _ ST.:....t UL...F.1 ... `TD...MMRINE...INSIT$AN:CE..COMPANY , a corporation, . that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the'co'rporate seal of said corporation, and that said instru.f ent was•executed in behalf of 'said corporation by authority of its Board of _.........D7.raGtQ : ; and that said 1 Bruce...N... .Te1andeV._�.. "ern'eis:d e ri .. - "�• '7 ; to be the free act. and deed f said corpor lion °� NINl1 E. WERS EIN S v_4{ yiln NOTARY n�IC.MINNISOTA .. \., ' 4i : MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 1 - County, � �' �;„�s°� JANUARY 31,2000 Notary Public January 31, 2000 . ,)fy commission• expires............_.._...._._ __..... . • • • • j ' i • i i I ;:facsirnile,and any such power of attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and W RECORDED RETURN TO: Office of the City Clerk Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98065 • . USItIA GRANTOR: Opus Northwest,L.L.C. a Delaware limited Project. Springbrook Industrial Center liability company PID: 242304-9020 GRANTEE: City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation Grantor: Opus Northwest,L.L.C. of King County STR: 242304 ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Street Intersection: Raymond and Adjusted Lot 2'of City of Renton Lot Line S.W. 19th Adjustment No.LUA-95-064-LLA. 2,4 Recorded under Recording No. 9508039005, King County,Washington. . Full description is on pages A-1 and?.-2. ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL No: 242304-9020-08 EASEMENT AGREEMENT (No Monetary Consideration) THIS INSTRUMENT is made the , ,�— day of ' 19v-, by and between OPUS NORTHWEST L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company , hereinafter called "Grantor," and the CITY OF RENTON,a Municipal Corporation of King County,Washington,hereinafter called"Grantee." Grantor owns certain real property situated in King County, Washington (the "Property") the legal CO2 description of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Grantor,for and in consideration of mutual benefits, does by these presents,grants,bargains,sells, conveys,and warrants unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, an easement for public utilities (including water, wastewater, and surface water) with necessary appurtenances over, under, through, across and upon the following described property (the "Utilities Easement') in King County,. Washington,more particularly described as follows: See attached Exhibit B for legal description of the Utilities Easement area. INITIAL DOCUMENT FORM APPROVED BY a CITY ATTO p be--f' la I/°I1 /�l Y � I PROPERTY SERVICES avvormeic?fAtt.itet...fr. The aforementioned Utilities Easement is also referred to below as the "Right-of-Way" and is granted according to the following conditions: For the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, installing, repairing, replacing, enlarging, operating and maintaining underground utilities and utility pipelines, including,but not limited to, water, sewer and storm drainage lines, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor. Following the initial construction of its facilities. Grantee may from time to time construct such additional underground facilities, as it may require within the Right-of-Way. This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions 1. Grantee droll give reasonable notice to Grantor and any occupants (the "Occupants") of the building located on the parcel within which the Right-of-Way is located(the"Parcel")before exercising the easement rights granted herein, if its activities might impact the business operations or activities of the Grantor or the Occupants. Except in case of emergency, Grantee shall coordinate its activities with the Grantor and the Occupants so as to cause minimum disruption to the business operations and activities of the Grantor and the Occupants. 2. The Grantee chap, upon completion of any work within the Parcel, at Grantee's cost promptly restore the surface and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work, as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in ittimediately before commencement of the work • or entry by the Grantee. (7) 3. Grantor shall retain the right to use the IRight-of-Way as long as such use does not e1 interfere with the easement rights herein granted to the Grantee. Grantor shall not, however, have the right to: (a) Erect or maintain any building or structures within the Right-of-Way; or I"t (b) Plant trees, shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage to or interfere with the utilities to be placed within the Right-of-Way by the Grantee; or I' II (c) Develop, landscape, or beautify,the Right-of-Way area in any way which would unreasonably increase the costs to the Grantee of restoring the Right-of-Way area and any private improvements therein. • (d) Dig, tunnel or perform other forms of construction activities on the Parcel which 17 would disturb the'compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the Right-of- • Way,or endanger the lateral support facilities. (e) Blast within fifteen(15)feet of the Right-of-Way. I I it LIB This easement shall run with the land described herein, and shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant.that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. III 1 GRANTOR: OPUS NORTHWEST,L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company By: Jo Solberg 1 ZCi a President STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that John Solberg is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Vice President of Opus Northwest,L.L.C., to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Dated: I — gg- Gl- • (Si attire of No Iubhc) C 01 .\1 40"66111tio einhel'i (lours d (Printed Name of Notary Public) /r/act • mow.:_= My Appointment expires. I� . 0. �FCE�R3E•,,C?Q� 'FTgTE C � •� -.SillIt5t 3 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY • Project: Springbrook Industrial Center ;I PID: 242304-9020 Grantor. Opus Northwest,L.L.C. STR: 242304 Street Intersection: Raymond and S.W. 19th THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 13.SECTION 24.TOWNSHIP 23,NORTH.RANGE 4 EAST, WILLIAMETTE MERIDIAN.IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON.MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID(SECTION 24;THENCE NORTH 00°47'36' EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF 9.69 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF A 40.00 FOOT WIDE RIGHT OF WAY FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK AS,DESCRIBED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 9412231106 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 37°00'42'WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE,A DISTANCE OF 32.02 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55°28'15'WEST 83.16 FEET; ' THENCE NORTH 52°24'00'WEST 186.02 FEET; j THENCE NORTH 54°03'5T WEST 280.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 35°11'09'WEST 138.12 FEET; • THENCE NORTH 23°44'21'WEST 81.38 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.78 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH IA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52°20'18'AN ARC DISTANCE OF 32.69 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENCY; • THENCE NORTH 50°08'30'EAST 107.69 FEET; , THENCE NORTH 51°45'16'EAST 68.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 59°39'11'EAST 93.78 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A CURVE CONCAVE II TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 154.57 FEET; CD THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45°50'57'AN g i ARC DISTANCE OF 123.69 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; till THENCE NORTH 13°48'14'EAST 114.90 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 334.26 FEET; N^' THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH,A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°45'26'AN ARC `� DISTANCE OF 214.44 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENCY; 41.4 THENCE NORTH 23°47'30'WEST 104.50 FEET; • THENCE NORTH 28°32'10'WEST 63.10 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20°51'33'WEST 41.80 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID II cn GOVERNMENT LOT 13 AS SAID LINE IS SHOWN ON A RECORD OF SURVEY BY R.F.MILLPOINTER AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 8910069012 AND WHICH BEARS NORTH 87°26'45'WEST FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 13; , THENCE SOUTH 87°26'45"EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 378.76 FEET TO SAID NORTHEAST CORNER; THENCE SOUTH 00°47'36'WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 24,A DISTANCE OF 1,320.39 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; (ALSO KNOWN AS ADJUSTED LOT 2 OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER LUA • - 95-064-LLA,RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9508039005). oy93. 3T Ia:II %:a (... I �'I J _0,:•L LAB•S it ` XPIRES 9/21/99 /t/9--97 A-1 _,__.�_,__,�,__ 1 i 1 1 . EXHIBIT B UTILITIES EASEMENT AREA Project: Springorook ludustrial Cater PIED: 242304-9020 Grantor: Opus Northwest,L.L.C. STIR: 242304 Street Intersection: Raymond and S.W. I9th A 15.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS ADJUSTED LOT 2 OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-95-064-LLA AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 9508039005; SAID STRIP OF LAND HAVING 7.50 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINES: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, WHICH LIES S 00°47'36'W • 10.51 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE S 50°10'41°W 55.67 FEET; c7y THENCE S 56°08'11"W 108.98 FEET; t?' THENCE S 14°19'36"W 219.62 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS td POINT"A"; • THENCE CONTINUING.S 14°19'36°W 149.82 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED d' TO AS POINT"B"; N THENCE CONTINUING S 14°19'36"W 108.86 FEET; THENCE S 45°10'45"W 27.10 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFEERED TO AS POINT"C"; THENCE CONTINUING S 45°10'45' W 182.76 FEET; THENCE S 01°03'18" E 5.00 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT"0"; THENCE CONTINUING S 01°03'18° E 235.04 FEET; THENCE S 07°08'42" E 14.20 FEET; THENCE S 55°04'24° E 134.66 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT"E"; THENCE CONTINUING S 55°04'24" E 71.49 FEET; THENCE S 66°31'22° E 27.73 FEET; THENCE S 89°05'06" E.21.35 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS • POINT"F"; THENCE CONTINUING S 89°05'06" E 65.65 FEET;. THENCE N 42°34'04" E 17.16 FEET; THENCE N 00°48'06" E 335.05 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT"G"; B-1 1 1 • • THENCE CONTINUING N 00°48'06" E 205.80 FEET; THENCE N 20°25'13"W 38.00 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT"H"; THENCE CONTINUING N 20°25'13"W 34.10 FEET; II THENCE N 00°38'36" E 351.41 FEET; THENCE N 24°26'44' E 8.43 FEET; THENCE N 46°57'09' E 152.26 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2 WHICH LIES S 00°47'36"W 18.80 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; AND BEGINNING AT AFORESAID POINT"A"; I THENCE N 75'40'24"W 54.40 FEET; THENCE S 85°02'18"W 22.43 FEET, MORE OR LESS,TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2; AND BEGINNING AT AFORESAID POINT"B"; THENCE S 75°40'24' E 25.67 FEET; AND BEGINNING AT AFORESAID POINT"C"; THENCE S 44°49'15" E 28.92 FEET; AND BEGINNING ATI AFORESAID POINT"D"; THENCE S 88°56'421 W 41.97 FEET; THENCE N 01°03'18"W 16.85 FEET; AND BEGINNING AT AFORESAID POINT'E': , THENCE S 34°55'36"W 19.43 FEET; , AND BEGINNING AT AFORESAID POINT'F'; THENCE S 00°54'54"W 36.12 FEET; 4-1 AND BEGINNING AT AFORESAID POINT"G"; '1 Cr THENCE S 89°11'54 E 18.95 FEET; ( P N AND BEGINNING AT AFORESAID POINT "H"; PI THENCE N 69°34'47' E 21.48 FEET TO THE TERMINUS OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED V •CENTERLINES; 0) THE SIDELINES OF SAID EASEMENT SHALL BE EXTENDED OR SHORTENED, AS NECESSARY, TO INTERSECT THE EAST AND WEST LINES OF SAID LOT 2. sff a/ 9 S• . ^ '! ;1 i� . �..•. •fit. V • �4s O4:WA8St 1 i t:{7 l'. 2 3itti • ":'?IsTsa •44' g 5 ,,J I. c'i'4 L LAy0 ' XPIRES 9 i 21/99 '4 it It-30-9 7 B-2 _ • EXHIBIT &CONTINUED • EASEMENT MAP EXHIBIT . Project Springbrook Industrial Center PID: 242304-9020 Grantor. Opus Northwest,L.L.C. STR: 242304 • Street Intersection: Raymond and S.W. 19th • NONIMKSI COWtR l01 2. , O11 CF RENION WI LIC A0[SIL(NI 140. LW-93-06I-LIA REC.N0. I30e019003 —S 001T3611 1660' RAYMOND •k' 4 i AVENUE S.W' 6\ S 0P471671 1031'— \•'S' c _ ',tG 117 E. W 0 fTA1I1•A• POINT'N• KW.0• 11 PONI 7• . W N6t Fowl ` �- I (� ar scow c 0 r .� Fo[n LOT 2 1: �1 1 I 1"� I © i POUN•C• Po1I T . lit M SPRING 0 n 0. tbq II POHL ro O D rgi LOT 1 co S.Ste4, , i. iir:k ''': ... :4116-) ,,: 1ff ,,,• O•: • 200 100 0 200 400 1r'A( L**�S [ifF[I 9/21/99 GRAPHICAL SCALE: 1•• = 200' l..��((( /s•L,-97 H HEI3RANK, STEADMAN 1�RAYM Wl AS—BUILT WATERLINE EASEMENT QAfE;ja)0C97 FOR BT:P & ASSOCIATCS, P.S. SP RINGBROOK IMP CHECK:ASS INDUSTRIAL FINAL OIECK:ns PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS CENTER . 97132.00 666L FIFTH MINE SOURS SEATILE.NA49NOT011 Sill(L06176 09R CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON SIIffT 10F2 • B-3 • EXHIBIT B CONTINUED '• EASEMENT COURSE,BEARING & DISTANCE i I . COURSE BEARING DISTANCE COURSE BEARING DISTANCE 1 1 S 50'10'41"W 55.67' ! 21 N 00'38.36"E 351.41' 2 S 56'08'11"W 108.98' I 22 N 24'26.44"E 8.43' 3 S 14'19'36"W 219.62' .1 23 N 46'57'09"E 152.26' 4 S 14'19'36"W 149.82' 24 N 75'40'24"W 54.40' 5 S 14'19'36"W 108.86' I 25 S 85'02.18"W 22.43' 6 S 45'10'45"W 27.10' j 26 S 75'40.24"E 25.67' 7 S 45'10'45"W 182.76' I 27 S 44'49.15"E 28.92' . 8 S O1'03.18"E 5.00' 28 S 88'56'42"W 41.97' • 9 S O 1'03'18"E 235.04' I 29 N O1'03'18"W 16.85' 10 S 07'08'42"E 14.20' 30 S 34'55'36"W 19.43' • 1 11 S 55'04.24"E 134.66' 31 S 00'54'54"W 36.12' 12 S 55'04.24"E 71.49' 1 32 S 89'11'54"E 18.95' 13 S 66'31'22"E 27.73' 33 N 69'34.47"E 21.48' 14 S 89'05'06"E 21.35' 15 S 89'05.06"E 65.65' tA 16 N 42'34.04"E 17.16' 1 17 N 00'48'06"E 335.05' 18 N 00'48'06"E 205.80' :I, 19 N 20'25'13"W 38.00' Idi Nuos.sTFq 20 N 20'25.13"W 34.10' AL Lilo ' ,, ❑WPCs 9/2I/99 I 1 I /2-dt-!7 N IIEBRANK STEADMAN AS-BUILT WAI ORNE EASEMENT D+iTF S:I?EC9L. DRANK BLEVI'& • ASSOCIATES, P.S. u SPRINGBROOK ANECKbS FIP CHECK:SS INDUSTRIAL APROFESSIONAL J LAND SURVEYORS CENTER - 97132.00 it 6509 FIFTH►9EAE SCUM SEAM.W*OINGTCN UM(29O)1M1912 CITY OF RENTON. COUNTY OF KING. STATE OF WASNWGTON 'SIEC12OF2 i • i . i Ii i I . B-4 i II 1 i I 0 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Office of the City Clerk Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 980.E GRANTOR Opus Northwest,L.L.C.,a Delaware limited project•. Sprmgbrook Industrial Center liability company PID: 242304-9020 GRANTEE: City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation Grantor. Opus Northwest,L.L.C. of King County STR: 242304 ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION:11, Street Intersection: Raymond and t1) Adjusted Lot 2 of City of Renton Lot Line. S.W. 19th Adjustment No.LUA-95-064-LLA. Recorded under Recording No. 9508039005, King County,Washington. N Full description is on pages A-1 and A-2. 1r0 ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL No: 242304-9020-08 EASEMENT AMENDMENT AGREEMENT (No Monetary Consideration) 0 THIS INSTRUMENT is made the 'O- day of D Pm _iy 19 Q by and between OPUS NORTHWEST L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company , hereinafter called "Grantor," and the CITY OF RENTON,a Municipal Corporation of King County,Washington,hereinafter called"Grantee." g Grantor owns certain real property situated in King County, Washington (the "Property") the legal u, description of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 0 a The Property is the subject of an easement for maintaining a sewer line and appurtenances (the "Sewer Easement") previously granted to Grantee, the legal description of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B. The Sewer Easement was recorded April 8, 1997 under Recording No. 9704081637 in the real property records of King x County,Washington. • H I . x I S ' 0 INITIAL DOCUMENT FORM APPROVE,p BY CITY ATTORNEY ia-ig"77 Z 1 PROPERTY SERVICES • y�r e t D i This Agreement amends the Sewer Easement agreement by replacing an incorrect diagram recorded with and used to illustrate the Sewer Line Easement (attached hereto as Exhibit C. the "Incorrect Sewer Easement Diagram"). The corrected diagram describing the Sewer Easement is attached hereto as Exhibit D (the "Sewer Easement Diagram"). All other terms and conditions of the Sewer Easement remain in full force and effect and are unchanged by this Agreement. GRANTOR: GRANTEE: OPUS NORTHWEST,L.L.C., CITY OF RENTON, a Delaware limited liability company a Municipal Corporation of King County By: : ' I c ,4•.4" /� • J olberg ' By: Vice President Name: Jesse Tanner Title: Ail,4gel%— STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. V, COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that John Solberg is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Vice President of Opus Northwest,L.L.C., to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Dia Dated: �r�- ge / 4&inc, gi1iUIj4 Signs of Notary�blic) Vain �:G)�G (Printed Name of. otary Public) -/ +tlA LIC My Appointment expires D/3//,9606 ,�%`•�••:eER ��•�C��e' 2 _ - , - - ti • • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Yey4i �/t/iW is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the At iktiO,- of The City of Renton to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument •�� 44%g510N �o NOTARY 0% M —.A._ (Signature o 1,/o y Public) r/ DNA %C PUBLIC oo;'2y �IL�N r�i� l� /► . sy), .. 20;�Oeee i!/(J� ,, �•�... ER..• '�O �. (Printed Name of Notary Public) •#•i•0FWASH ss,, My Appointment expires /0 .41 t`w, 3 x EXHIBIT A • LEGAL DESCRIPTION;•OF THE PROPERTY • Project Springbrook Industrial Center PID: 242304-9020 Grantor. Opus Northwest,L.L.C. . STR: 242304 Street Intersection: Raymond and S.W. 19th THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 13,SECTION124,TOWNSHIP 23,NORTH.RANGE 4 EAST, WILLIAMETTE MERIDIAN,IN KING COUNTY.WASHINGTON,MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 'i COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 24;THENCE NORTH 00°47'36' • EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF 9.69 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF A 40.00 FOOT WIDE RIGHT OF WAY FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK AS DESCRIBED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 9412231106 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 37°00'42'WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE,A DISTANCE OF 32.02 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55°28'15'WEST 83.16 FEET; • THENCE NORTH 52°24'00'WEST 186.02 FEET; , THENCE NORTH 54°03'5T WEST 280.51 FEET; . THENCE NORTH 35°11'09'WEST 138.12 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23°44'21'WEST 81.38 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A CURVE • CONCAVE TO THE EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.78 FEET; • THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52°20'18'AN ARC. DISTANCE OF 32.69 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 50°08'30'EAST 107.69 FEET; L') THENCE NORTH 51°45'16'EAST 68.97 FEET; . THENCE NORTH 59°39'11'EAST 93.78 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A CURVE CONCAVE Veil TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 154.57 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45°50'57'AN Kr ARC;DISTANCE OF 123.69 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; C4 THENCE NORTH 13°48'14'EAST 114.90 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A CURVE C4 CONCAVE TO THE WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 334.26 FEET; r°'4 THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°45'26'AN ARC DISTANCE OF 214.44 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENCY; r THENCE NORTH 23°47'30'WEST 104.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28°32'10'WEST 63.10 FEET; I THENCE NORTH 20°51'33'WEST 41.80 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 13 AS SAID LINE IS SHOWN ON A RECORD OF SURVEY BY R.F.MILLPOINTER AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 8910069012 AND WHICH BEARS NORTH 87°26'45'WEST FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 13; THENCE SOUTH 87°26'45'EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 378.76 FEET TO SAID NORTHEAST CORNER; THENCE SOUTH 00°47'36'WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 24,A DISTANCE OF 1,320.39 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; (ALSO KNOWN AS ADJUSTED LOT 2 OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER LUA- 95-064-LLA RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9508039005). v9g:s?':, 7 i. I.,'s,p4,C a$.9:1 • ! ',V 0 L LAKE \ 1 EXPIRES 9/21/99 0a/9-97.. A-1 vi ry i r • EXHIBIT B SEWER EASEMENT AREA Project: Springbrook ltrdustrial Center PM: 242304-9020 Grantor. Opus Northwest,L.L.C. STR: 242304 Street Intersection: Raymond and S.W. 19th A 15.00 foot wide easement for maintaining a Sewer Line and appurtenances, within the Springbrook Industrial Center. said easement tieing 7.50 feet wide on each side of the following described easement• centerline: Commencing at the Northeast Property Corner of Adjusted Lot 2 of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment Number L1!A-95-064-1.1.A,as recorded under'King County Recording Number 9508039005: • Thence North 87"26'45" West along the North Property Line.,a distance of 25.16 fret to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this Easement Centerline Description: Thence South I7"22'45" µ'gist. a distance of.256.04 feet: Thence South 62"36'16" West, a distance of 138.00 fret to the'I'crmmus of this Sewer Line Centerline Easement Description. t.2 r1 e•1 i p • B-1 . . 'EXHIBIT C • INCORRECT SEWER EASEMENT DIAGRAM Project Springbrook Industrial Center Pm: 242304-9020 Grantor Opus Northwest,L.L.C. STR: 242304 , I Street Intersection: Raymond and S.W. 19th 1 ; ,..,• • ,."" •• :''':•• •.....,•::::. ..................g. . 'IC: Llt••••=lt i.3- _ _.1777.!.7 — — = ,.',..---- ..scr.: :asc:-7..-mar 4,-...2:01/. 4,, •72 ::: .. •• :::_ .,;,:r:: , •• • t -, .•••• f• r r • . . 1 _'•,:: _•,1-"...i: ;.. . , • •I: ii: = ...: — - - . , ,_, •• .1 .......4. • .: .- . C) I. 3.7:41.' •; •• "::7 . 7:-.7- ' ...... S. :7 L-:: • ::;: - i. -r:I.::. • .1..r tr, ,•••:71 .• ... ,.. LC) SIZialiniiii.1114t.1 ..-. .. .t. :7-7:'" • :I -: - . 1 - 1.4 I .. 7••2• •-••C : •••••-•. .. . ••••• :• • Id 1 7 I. .--.•.. • *-4.....• ... ' ...f.T. _.... -:•• ..:.• 4 ,. 'a'.... t. .. "....:. VIC I ....... r•'• .... ' '... .• •44... -. 1 3... .4...-;.'...• • :..:..r.. VA T :-....--•• -S .t ::r , .;, i'• , -..: •...: i. :7:4-, • 'I.:: a) / • •. ,, .. •:,.....-••-•:.: .• , - " :. :7:4•- • •-• It 1 .... .. -.. '"I• ! ., • rt / • 1••• • • 1-2 :1' S :2*: 4 C. ::: :2.r.... •j.... ..... .. f• •.•.. •'''. ...• .. .. .:C..=.17.. '" '' •- :. 1.3-*r.:, C ' :i I'. 4 . '..31 , ":...,. . - . • •••• • 7 III .• 6.4.4... , ' :•:.".• ...-.r. 4. .4 I:: Z../;:'4" C44 '.' • .A .. . .. .. . .. ..'••• !I. - .. ..%i ;'• .1. r••: 1 • I:: r ...)". -,-E. ! - 1 ... ,, .• .i e 1 : ,ri •I. :rtr...• • I '• ...4e1.4.• !. , '.N. ...;.• :41 I • r-, 4 ::.1.:5- L.. : 23 J! ,!' \ I T ! i 'aft"I:CI' i..1 • • I'. 1 I PI 'I. •:-e'•:.• C I •:2:- _. II . W•110'7.;!- 9-:za ";:. , .x.:.7:3. .c. : •7:. .* ' rri•-•"'.1% I I. • .... • . : . ... . . . . • ' N. •.•:..... . :..: 2.--• "I-I.•! : :: .: ...._ ...:.....,..:... .i: i•-• :. ••••-I I : :! •• .' •"'...••••'' •'•• . ".'• ••• • •' '' . s _ . •• . . -•-. '••Z. z_L ... . •••... 4•.... . : • :: .. .. ..--.- :2--.•-"-- .i .. . , C-1 . _ . . . - . EXHIBIT D SEWER EASEMENT DIAGRAM Project Springbrook Industrial Center PID: 242304-9020 Grantor: Opus Northwest,L.L.C. STR: 242304 Street Intersection: Raymond and S.W. 19th 110Ri1M51 CORER LOT:. • OTT Of REM10N LOT LIE AWJYS11ENT ND. LUA-95.06/-UA REC.NO. - 950600500S RAYMOND N ST261511 25.16 AVENUE S.W 1722.151 256 EC CET9ECAVANG 1 15:Of 15� S 62 36.16 N 159.00• . LOT 2 • 1111,1 m / I cra SPRI Mc 11.4 s I/ Dim CP,O LOT 1 rs %t °,� 200 100 0 200 400 "5 •I1 DNA( L AMA S -- EWKS 9/21/0 GRAPHICAL SCALE: 1" _ 200' "" iz•2s.-97 AS—BUILT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AI FOR�H IIEBRANh, STEADMAN FGR RANTI N91 & ASSOCIATES, P.S. SPRINGBROOK INDUSTRIAL JAP CHECK:JSS OIAL CHECK JSS APROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS CENTER 97132.00 6569 FIFTH AVM(SOUR SEATTLE Wi91WGTON 9U06 L200)262.1962 CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON SHEET 1 a 1 • • D-1 4 i- • • WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:' YAI Office of the City Clerk Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 • GRANTOR: Opus Northwest,L.L.C.,a Delaware limited Project:. Springbrook Industrial Center liability company PID: 242304-9020 GRANTEE: City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation Grantor: Opus Northwest,L.L.C. of King County STR: 242304 ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Street Intersection: Raymond and Adjusted Lot 2 of City of Renton Lot Line S.W. 19th 115 Adjustment No.LUA-95-064-LLA. Recorded under Recording No.9508039005, vai King County,Washington. • d' Full description is on pages A-1 and A-2. ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL No: 242304-9020-08 C AGREEMENT TO AMEND DRAINAGE CHANNEL EASEMENT (No Monetary Consideration) THIS AGREEMENT TO AMEND DRAINAGE CHANNEL EASEMENT ("Amendment") is made the 27i-9 day of (7ecmirlber 19 97, by and between OPUS NORTHWEST L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company , hereinafter called "Grantor," and the CITY OF RENTON, a Municipal Corporation of King County, Washington,hereinafter called"Grantee." rg Grantor owns certain real property situated in King County, Washington (the "Property") the legal p, description of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. A portion of the Property is subject to an easement for constructing, using, and maintaining a drainage schannel(the"Drainage Channel Easement")previously granted to Grantee in an instrument recorded July 5, 1996, cj under Recording No. 9607050550 in the real property records of King County, Washington: The legal description of the area subject to the Drainage Channel Easement(the"Easement Area")is attached hereto as Exhibit B. d INITIAL DOCUMENT FORM APPROVED BY CITY ATTO /t248-917 6 A M_ - 0,,,,,f,t4e5/3A24-7ter I PROPERTY SERVICES N • • I • This Amendment amends the Drainage Channel Easement agreement as follows: 1. Grantee agrees that the existing encroachments into the Drainage Channel Easement Area as shown in that certain survey recorded on December 23 , 1997 in the real property records of King County, Washington under Recording No. 91 r 2 2.3—Soot (the "Existing Allowable Encroachments") may remain in the Easement Area. 2. At the time Grantee plans the construction of the drainage channel improvements that Grantee intends to construct in the Easement Area(the"Channel Improvements") Grantor and Grantee shall cooperate in designing the drainage Channel Improvements to minimize the need for retaining walls to support the Existing Allowable Encroachments and maintain the slope of the adjacent Channel Improvements. 3. If Grantee determines that rock retaining walls are required to support the Existing Allowable Encroachments and maintain the slope of the adjacent Channel Improvements, Grantee shall notify Grantor of the height and general location of the required walls. Grantor shall either(1)design and construct such retaining walls in accordance with plans and specifications approved by Grantee or (2) pay Grantee's costs of designing and constructing such retaining walls. The obligations of Grantor under this Amendment ("Grantor's Channel Obligations")are personal to Opus Northwest,L.L.C.,a Delaware limited liability company. I' f�f 4. To secure the performance by Grantor of the Grantors Obligations, Grantor shall post a$50,000, two- year bond. Grantee shall have the option to require Grantor to'extend the term of the bond for a third year, if the retaining wall construction described in this agreement has not!been substantially completed within the two-year bond period. • All other terms and conditions of the Drainage Channel Easement remain in full force and effect and are e3' unchanged by this Agreement. � I -01 � I i I GRANTOR: GRANTEE: OPUS NORTHWEST,`L.L.C., CITY OF RENTON, a Delaware limited liability compan a Municipal Corporation of King County By: taillalmtri i . Solberg; 1 By: 4444 Vice President Name: Jesse Tanner Title: 14 Att'OL ' u 2 • • i • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that John Solberg is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to ' execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Vice President of Opus Northwest,L.L.C., to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. ;,,,,. ;•/,9 agi9f . Y ••• / 4 . / /j(rhvym v.. et.r.. N...o. .... . tir)zytzq z � (Siure of NVr,)Public) ?„ I "'.11 Bi 0 3 1\1 1771)ei7/(/ 14 (I ourj iliso yip Q ,.. 0•: (Printed Name of Notary Public) '49 .•Py,�,,,� My Appointment expires /2/51/ / f) .••••�OFeV`.t*,.t In STATE OF WASHINGTON ) (.7 )ss. t•'•i COUNTY OF KING ) • 41 who the `� I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 1(�i4e�A1UNP4 isperson !ui appeared before me,and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she • •Po was authoriz ejiNleW14Pi4 a instrument and acknowledged it as the A4*t f 0i of The City of Renton to be the fiot of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. .��gDDaatteedd % ♦ A ( ° * &; T tnAt p PUBUC o. ! (Signature o i t Public) "♦'••,,.WASN�t�� (Printed Name of Notary Public) My Appointment expires 10 'f' 3 , I , , 1 • 1' EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY ' Project S tin brook Industrial Center P >; j, HD: 242304-9020 . ' Grantor. Opus Northwest, L.L.C. STR: 242304 1 Street Intersection: Raymond and S.W. 19th THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 13,SECTION 24,TOWNSHIP 23,NORTH.RANGE 4 EAST, • WILLIAMETTE MERIDIAN,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON.MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID'SECTION 24;THENCE NORTH 00°47'36' EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF 9.69 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF A 40.00 FOOT WIDE RIGHT OF WAY FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK AS DESCRIBED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 9412231106 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 37°00'42'WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT,OF WAY LINE,A DISTANCE OF 32.02 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55°28'15'WEST 83.16 FEET; ' THENCE NORTH 52°24'00'WEST 186.02 FEET; I I THENCE NORTH 54°03'57'WEST 280.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 35°11'09'WEST 138.12 FEET; In THENCE NORTH 23°44'21'WEST 81.38 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.78 FEET; T4 THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52°20'18"AN ARC • uI DISTANCE OF 32.69 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENCY; 41 THENCE NORTH 50°08'30'EAST 107.69 FEET; N THENCE NORTH 51°45'16'EAST 68.97 FEET; N THENCE NORTH 59°39'11'EAST 93.78 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A CURVE CONCAVE .4 TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 154.57 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45°5017'AN P. ARC DISTANCE OF 123.69 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 13°48'14"EAST 114.90 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 334.26 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°45'26"AN ARC DISTANCE OF 214.44 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 23°47'30'WEST 104.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28°32'10'WEST 63.10 FEET; . THENCE NORTH 20°51'33'WEST 41.80 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 13 AS SAID LINE IS SHOWN ON A RECORD OF SURVEY BY R.F.MILLPOINTER AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 8910069012 AND WHICH BEARS NORTH 87°26'45'WEST FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 13; THENCE SOUTH 87°26'45'EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 378.76 FEET TO SAID NORTHEAST . CORNER; THENCE SOUTH 00°47'36'WEST ALONG THE EAST UNE OF SAID SECTION 24,A DISTANCE OF 1,320.39 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; (ALSO KNOWN AS ADJUSTED LOT 2 OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER LUA- . 95-064-LLA.RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9508039005). �0�9'�•i 9r >;e a;,m x••o of I" =� i 1 ��.s� eca mist �•J¢ ` .Yq L LA "\ _xPIRES 9/21/99 4/l/9-97 I' , 1 ' i EXHIBIT B DRAINAGE CHANNEL EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION Project: Springbrook Industrial Center P1D: 242304-9020 Grantor: Opus Northwest,L.L.C. STR: 242304 Street Intersection: Raymond and S.W. 19th )dement Area; That portion of Lot 2 of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LLA-95-064 (King County Recording No. 95C8039005)in the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 24,Township 23 North,Range 4 East.W.M., in King County.Washington,described as follows: Commencing at the south corner of said Lot 2 and the true point of beginning; thence along the west line of said Lot 2 the following courses: 7.4 N 37°00'42"W 32.02 feet; ' thence N 55°28'15"W 83.16 feet; thence N 52°24'00"W 186.02 feet; ;hence N 54°03'57"W 230.51 feet; thence N 35°11'09"W 138.12feet; rNI thence N 23°44'21"W 81.33 feet to a curve concave to the east having a radius of 35.78 feet; Cq thence northerly along said curve through a central angle of 52°20'28"an arc distance of 32.69 feet; it 1 thence leaving said curve on a non-tangent bearing N 50°08'30"E 107.69 feet; iNb thence N 51°45'16'E 68.97 feet; thence N 59°39'11"E 93.78 feet to a curve concave to the northwest having a radius of.154.57 feet; thence northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 45°50'57"an arc distance of 123.69 feet; thence N 13°48'14"E 114.90 feet to a curve concave to the west having a radius of 334.26 feet; thence northerly along said curve through a central angle of 36°45'26"an arc.distance of 214.44 feet; thence leaving said curve on a non-tangent bearing N 23°47'30"W 104.50 feet; thence N 28°32'10"W 63.10 feet; thence,N 20°51'33"W 41.80 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 2; " thence leaving said west line of said Lot 2 S 87°26'45"E along the north line of said Lot 2 140.00 feet; thence leaving said north line S 37°01'21"W 82.90 feet; thence S 23°47'30" E 96.43 feet to a point on a curve,concave to the west, said•curve being non-tangent to the preceeding course and having a radius of 384.26 feet,the center of which bears S 65°25'36"W; thence southerly along said curve through a central angle of 36°45'26"an arc distance of 257.38 feet; thence S 13°48'14"W 114.90 feet to a curve'concave to the northwest having a radius of 204.57 feet; thence southwesterly along said curve through a cer.tral angle of 45°50'57"an arc distance of 163.70 feet; thence S 59°39'11 W 90.32 feet; ' thence S 51°45'16"W 61.54 feet to a curve concave to the east having a radius of 105.00 feet; thence southerly along said curve through a central angle of 86°56'32"an arc distance of 159.33 feet; thence S 35°11'09"E 88.78 feet;• ' ' thence'S 54°03'57"E 272.92 feet; thence S 52°24'00"E 185.41 feet; thence S 55°28'15"E 72.03 feet to the east line of said Lot 2; thence S 00°47'36"W along said east line 72.32 feet to the true point of beginning. Contains 90,418 square feet of land.,more or less. B-1 ' EXHIBIT B CONTINUED MAP EXHIBIT Project: Springbrook Industrial Center PID: 242304-9020 Grantor: Opus Northwest,L.L.C. STR: 242304 Street Intersection: Raymond and S.W. 19th 22 ' 10 9 ex23 � i 8 $ 'I I 24' j! 7 25 `ee Lane and Cu ,'e Tablas on Following Sheet 6 26 5 ,I 27 • I 4 � II 28 o t'3too• ,00 3 29 ( 11.1 FEET ) 2 30 1 South Corner.of Lot 2 B-2 EXHIBIT B CONTINUED MAP EXHIBIT Project: Springbrook Industrial Center Pm: 242304-9020 Grantor. Opus Northwest,L.L.C. STR: 242304 Street Intersection: Raymond and S.W. 19th 17 Northwest Corner of Lot 2'----- 'g \ \ Line Table 18 l+e ID 1 arise Dist(11) 15 1 N 37'00'42"W 32.02 2 N55'2815"W 83.16 19 °rat 3 N 52'24'00"W 186.02 i N 5 •03.5T W 210.51 14 �� N 35'11.09"W i33.12 6 N 23.44'2r W 81.38 ill \\\ 8 N 50'08'30"'E 107.69 N 9 N 51.45'16"E 68.97 04 10 N 59'39'11'E 93.7E !"'l 12 N 13'41'14"E 114.90 PsT 14 N 23'4710"W 104.50 V) 15 N 28.32'10"W 63.10 13 16 N 20'5113"W 41.80 Curve Table 20 17 S 87'26'45"E 140.00 18 S 3r01 Zi"W 32.90 ID 0 Radios(It) Central Angie Are Lam* 19 S 23.47'30"E 96.43 7 35.7E 52'20'2r 32.69 21 S 13.48'14-W 114.90 11 154.57 45•50'5T 123.69 23 S 59'39'11"W 90.32 13 334.26 36•4526" 214.44 24 S 51.45'16"W 61.54 20 384.26 36.45'26" 257.3E 26 S 35.11'09"E' 88.78 22 204.57 45•S0'5r 163.70 27 S 54"03'5T E 272.92 25 105.00 86'56'32" 159.33 12 21 28 S 52'24'00"E 185.41 29 S 55'23'15'E 72.03 I 30 S 00•47'36"W 72.32 11 I . • 22 10 • 0 1'=100• ,00 . 'ts ( [N FEET ) 9 C+•S' 23 8 f 24 F B-3 e. CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM • DATE: February 9, 1998 TO: Project File FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning SUBJECT: Raymond Avenue Center II,LUA96-015,SA,SM,ECF General Electric has submitted a building permit for tenant improvements. The improvements include revisions to the parking area located along the western boundary of the project site. The curved parking area would be straightened out,resulting in the elimination of 6 parking spaces. According to calculations provided by the applicant, 13,071 s.f. would be used as office and 87,710 s.f. would be used as warehouse. The office use requires a minimum of 3/1,000 gsf and a maximum of 4.5/1,000 gsf. The required parking for the office use would be 39.21 minimum and 58.8 maximum. The warehouse requires 1 space per each 1,500 gsf. For the 87,710 s.f warehouse space, 58.47 parking spaces would need to be provided. The total amount of parking required for these specific uses would be 98 minimum and 117 maximum. The applicant is reducing the amount of parking by 6 stalls would not adversely affect the site and would comply with the intent of the Parking and Loading Ordinance as it was applied to the proposal when it was initially approved. A copy of the revision is attached. cc: \\TS_SERVER\SYS2:\COMMON\-Document6\jth Syitnesis Limited Liability Company • Architectsi RECEW JAN 1 9 1998 January 16, 1998 • BUILDING DIVISION • Jennifer Henning City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton.WA. 98055 - I ' RE: General Electric • Permit#B970813 Dear Ms.Henning: The following parking calculations are for 30 tenants. q.c(; ' >.D'`f Partners Books,Inc. Office: 2,672 SF @ 1:300 = 9 Warehouse: 26,811 SF @ 1:2500= 11 Washington Shoe Office: 3,011 SF @ 1:300 = 10 Warehouse: 33,995 SF @ 1:2500= 14 General Electric Office: 7,388 SF @ 1:300 =25 Warehouse: 26,904 SF @ 1:2500= 11 Total Parking Required: 80 Required Accessible Parking/WAC 1994 Table No. 11-F: 4 Total Parking Provided: 122 Total Accessible Parking: 6 Please call with any questions. Si r y, • ' .17-.= I -- 141 G I -r Jr ndy Bro 'ncipal chitect 7 /6) /: /S00 = 5� q 61:1 h- 97026.01/Doc/City of Renton Lt. /7/-. (i` ''- rl 12828 Northup Way,Suite 400,Bellevue,Washington 98005 1.—, 40 A. Phone:(425)869-1946 Fax:(425)885 6208 P 4.0 sTarF o� CITY OF RENTON RECFRIFD ems.... y /iEV ® :D9 y 1889 a STATE OF WASHINGTON al=vctve 1a•`uuI ve d cr5t;kJ DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office, 3190 - 160th Ave S.E. • Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452 • (425) 649-7000 January 6, 1998 . • Mark Miller Mark Miller Consultants 10801 Main Street, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98004 Dear Mr. Miller: Re: Renton Permit#LUA-96-015 RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II/WINMAR-METRO, INC. - Applicant Revised Shoreline Management Permit#1996-NW-10026-A The subject.Revised Shoreline Substantial Development p t Permit was approved by the City of Renton on December 10, 1997, and received and filed by this office on December 17, 1997. The 21 day appeal period will terminate January 07, 1998. At your own risk, construction may begin during this appeal period provided all other federal, state, and local laws regulating such construction have been complied with. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if this permit is appealed. Sincerely, U C�7� Ann E. Kenny, Shoreline Specialist Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program AEK:aek ' REVREC.DOC cc: James D. Hanson, City of Renton LJ CIT1 OF RENTON >,.. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 2, 1997 Dave Kessler Project Manager Opus Northwest LLC 200-112th Avenue NE Suite 205 Bellevue,WA 98004 SUBJECT: RAYMOND AVE. CENTER 2,LUA 96-015,SA,SM,ECF WETLAND BUFFER ENCROACHMENT APPROVAL REQUEST Dear Mr. Kessler: I am in receipt of your letter dated November 26, 1997, in which you request administrative approval of several small encroachments into the required 25-foot wide wetland buffer area along the east side of the Raymond Ave. Center 2(Springbrook Industrial Center)project. ISSUE:. The survey and as-built work associated with the subject project has revealed several small encroachments of the constructed facilities into the required 25-foot wide wetland buffer along the east side of this project. The applicant has requested administrative approval to leave the encroachments as they are, pursuant to Section 4-32-4B of the City's Wetlands Management Ordinance. EVALUATION: There are a number of small encroachments of the constructed facilities into the 25-foot wetland buffer. These include two long and narrow strips of asphalt approximately 120 and 80 linear feet long respectively and 1 to 2 feet wide; a roughly triangular piece of the entrance road roughly 5 feet wide by 25 feet long; a smaller triangular section of this same access road several feet by several feet in dimension; a water vault and blowoff valve assembly; and a fire hydrant. The applicant request is to obtain administrative approval for leaving these facilities in their constructed location. In support of the application, the applicant has stated that "the paving, hydrant, and water valve and blow off have absolutely no adverse impact to the wetland and its 25' buffer". Section 4-32-4B of the City Wetland Management Ordinance states in part: The following activities may be permitted with administrative review and approval by the Department Administrator: 1. Any activities having minimal adverse impacts as determined by the responsible official on buffers and no adverse impacts on regulated wetlands,provided all associated buffer impacts are mitigated. Document2 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 Page 2 December 2, 1997 It would appear that the subject encroachments are relatively minor in nature, and would meet the criteria of activities having minimal adverse impacts on the buffer, and no adverse impact on the regulated wetland. It would also appear that removal of the encroaching facilities would have an adverse impact on the viability of the development that would be disproportionate to any negative impacts to the wetlands that would occur if the encroaching facilities were to be left intact. DECISION: Administrative approval of the request to leave the encroachments into the wetland buffer as currently constructed is hereby granted, subject to the following condition to mitigate the impacts of this encroachment on the buffer area: 1) The applicant shall provide plantings in the wetland buffer areas adjacent to the encroachments. A planting plan shall be prepared by a biologist with expertise in wetlands, and shall be approved by Development Services Division staff prior to planting. Monitoring and replacement(as needed) of the wetland buffer plantings shall be pursuant to the provisions of the City Wetland Management Ordinance. Sincerely, 214 li Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Department cc: Jennifer Toth Henning(with attachment) ; DEC-22-97 MON 09:54 OPUS NORTHWFT LLC FAX 12064531712 P. 01/05 fink 4. opus Opus Northwest LLC • 200- 112th Avenue NE, Ste 205 Phone: (425)453-4100 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Faxp (425)453-1712 FAX COVER SHEET beL'4o �� /,g9? ,� 1JZ°i R�1 i/44/NG J To: � !r?b1;� Company: Fax Number: _ Phone Number: _ Date/Time: ZZ G Number of Pages (w/cover): Regarding: From: TW- ) 1(sL Message: • Original to follow? No Yes Please contact with questions or problems regarding transmission of this fax. The information contained in this facsimile message is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return the Original message to us at the above address. Thank you. DEC-22-97 NON 09:54 OPUS NORTHWEST LLC FAX NO. 12064531712 P. 02/05 •12/19/1997 16:52 3609432791 IES ASSOCIATES PACE 02 IES ASSOCIATES • 1514 Muirhead Ave.NW December 19, 1997 oiymwa,WA 99562 Ph:(380)943-6127 Fax:(360)943.2791 Jennifer Toth Henning Senior Planner City of Renton 200 Miii Avenue South Renton,Washington 98055 and Mr.Dave Kessler Opus Northwest,LLC 200-112th Avenue NE,Suite 205 Bellevue, WA 98004 RE: Raymond AVentic Center 2,UJA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF Dear Ms.Henning: We have reviewed the Upland Buffer Planting Plan developed by Wm.Todd Tressler,Landscape Architect for the Springbrook,Raymond Avenue Center proposal submitted by OPUS Northwest. All of the plantings tire suitable for the soil and hydrological conditions expected on the site at the completion of the project. The mix includes species with good protective cover and height diversity,wildlife food producers and color. All of the species,with the exception of Rosa rugosa,axe native to the Pacific Northwest. • I have talked with the designer about the selection of rugosa over native roses.His concerns were with lack of shade and soil conditions. An altetuative rose,which he has agreed to substitute if you require all native species,is bald-hip rose(Rosa gymnocarpa). It will not provide as much summer cover as rugosa,however, it is native to the Pacific Northwest. If you have questions,eell me at(360)943-0127. Sincer. y R . Van Wormer „,: land Ecologist J • n % h • :,�: /DEC-22-97 MON 09:55 OPUS NORTHWEST LLC FAX NO. 12064531712 P. 03/05 12/19/1997 16:52 3609432791 IES ASSQCIATES PAGE 01 !ES Associates 1514 Muirhead Avenue Olympia, WA 98502 (360) 943-0127 PHONE (360) 943-2791 FAX FAX ,./ DATE: 12-/t-97 TIME: • " 5/) TO: J _ NUMBER OF PAGES (�� - TO FOLLOW; � t PHONE , -42-5-4J5-'¢I 0 FAX: 425 453- /7/Z FROM: 2441/_ -r)hrp iaktk-V1 IF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMISSION, PLEASE CALL: (360) 943-0127 SUBJECT: _ MESSAGE: 4•14.441,t7,1‘rdilh r ).!•• _ • ;DEC-22-97 MON 09�55 OPUS NORTHWFGT LLC// FAX NO. 12064531712__ P. 04/05 12/19/1997 1711 _== COVER PAGE =__ TO: FAX: 14254531712 FROM : IES ASSOCIATES FAX : 3E 9432791 • TEL: 3E@S430127 COMMENT : URGENT 1 DEC-22-97 MON 09:56 OPUS NORTHWE'°T LLC FAX NO. 12064531712 P. 05/05 , 12/19/1997 17:11 3609432791 IES ASSOCIATES PAGE 01 IES Associates 1514 Muirhead Avenue Olympia, WA 98502 (360) 943--0127 PHONE (360) 943-2791 FAX FAX DATE: ! "/9 97 _ liME: 56 TO: Dalt,. NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW: PHONE: d.Z5--455-4106 FAX: 4Z5 17/2 FROM: • IF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMISSION, PLEASE CALL: (360) 943-0127 SUBJECT: Oo MESSAGE: FoY „k„`" do c fru. i s-x.2_ Li/I/Ad Zizz 64z y6,22..e ,i^W 40 CII = OF RENTON ° Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 17, 1997 Mr.Dave Kessler Opus Northwest,LLC 200-112th Avenue NE, Suite 205 Bellevue,WA 98004 SUBJECT: RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER 2,LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF Dear Mr. Kessler: We are in receipt of the landscape planting plan, dated December 12, 1997. The plan was prepared in order to comply with Gregg Zimmerman's condition of approval regarding encroachments into the wetland buffer area. The condition states: "The applicant shall provide plantings in the wetland buffer areas adjacent to the encroachments. A planting plan shall be prepared by a biologist with expertise in wetlands, and shall be approved by Development Services Division staff prior to planting Monitoring and replacement(as needed) of the wetland buffer plantings shall be-pursuant to the provisions of the City Wetland Management . Ordinance.''. If the plan has been prepared by a Landscape Architect,the professional stamp and signature must be shown on the'drawing. In addition, the.plan must be endorsed by a,wetlands biologist, per the condition. If the plan was prepared by•.a wetlands biologist, then a.letter from the biologist must accompany the plan. The Installation Notes included on the plan indicate that planting should occur October through December. _ Or, if planting occurs in the Spring'(March or April) irrigation would be required throughout the summer months. The City's Wetlands Management Ordinance (Code Section 4-32) a mitigation plan, and requires • bonding and monitoring for mitigation of wetland impacts. The Wetlands Mitigation Plan must outline how the monitoring data will be evaluated;monitoring reports shall be submitted quarterly for the first year and annually thereafter, and .at a minimum, should document milestones, successes, problems, and contingency actions of the compensation project. The monitoring must occur for a period of not less than five years. The City requires a surety device such as a letter of credit, irrevocable set-aside letter of cash in the amount equivalent to one and one-half (1-1/2) times the estimated cost of the performance and surety and conditions sufficient to fulfill the requirements. The City will release the surety device upon determining that all activities, including any required compensatory.mitigation, have been completed in compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit; and upon the posting of a maintenance surety device. The City requires posting of cash or other security acceptable to the City such as letter of credit or irrevocable surety and conditions sufficient to guarantee that mitigation required perform satisfactorily for a minimum of five(5)years after they have been completed. • • H:\DIVISION.SIDEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\JTHIOPSRYMD2.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 60 This paper contains 50%recycled material.20%post consumer - \ Page 2 1 December 17, 1997 In order to approve the Landscape Planting Plan and sign off on the condition permitted encroachment into the wetland buffer, staff will need verification of the acceptability of the plan from a wetlands biologist, a maintenance and monitoring plan, and surety devices for planting and maintenance as discussed above. Please contact me at(425)277-6186 if you have any questions regarding this correspondence. Sincerely, fotki, 41Na Jenm er Toth Henning Senior Planner i . , • • • CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: November 26, 1997 TO: Gregg Zimmerman FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning SUBJECT: Raymond Avenue Center II(Springbrook Industrial Center) Opus Northwest contacted me this week to discuss encroachment issues that had come to their attention as the result of an ALTA survey. As you will see from the attached map, "Area 3" has resulted in the encroachment of asphalt paving and curbing for the fire lane into the 25-foot wetland buffer area. "Area 5" is a water vault or valve and blowoff approximately one foot (1') inside the wetland buffer. "Area 9" shows a fire hydrant abutting the wetland buffer boundary, but it does not appear to cross into the buffer area. As noted in the owner's letter,they are willing to relocate the asphalt paving and curbing to meet City Code requirements of the Wetlands Ordinance. They have requested that they be allowed to leave the water vault and blow off in the current location. Typically, we would not have been made aware of this encroachment, and it came to light only as a result of the ALTA survey. Since Opus is in the process of closing a sale on the property, they must be in full compliance with City.Code, or have appropriate documentation showing that exceptions have been granted. Section 4-32-4B "Additional Allowed and Regulated Activities in a Wetland Buffer"states in part: The following activities may be permitted with administrative review and approval by the Department Administrator: 1. Any activities having minimal adverse impacts as determined by the responsible official on buffers and no adverse impacts on regulated wetlands, provided all associated buffer impacts are mitigated" Furthermore, an argument could be made that the activity is potentially exempt, according to Code Section 4-31-4.C.6 which states under"Exempt Activities" since the vault/valve and blow-off appear to encroach into the wetland buffer by less than 10%. "6. Overbuilding (enlargement beyond existing project, needs) or replacement of existing utility systems and replacement and/or rehabilitation of existing streets, provided the work does not increase the footprint of the structure, line or street by more than ten percent(10%) within the wetland and/or buffer areas." Buffer averaging is not an option in this instance, since minimum buffer width of 25 feet must be maintained. It appears that a determination could be made to permit the water vault/valve and blowoff to remain in their current location. In addition, the fire lane would represent less than a 10% encroachment is considered for the entire fire lane bordering the wetland buffer. November 26, 1997 Page 2 The applicant has requested consideration of these issue. I would be happy to discuss them with you. Please feel free to call me at X6186 if you have any questions. cc: project file LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF H:\W W60DOT\MEMO.DOT\bbh is Northwest LLC opus Su - Avenue NE _ Suite 205 205 Bellevue,Washington 98004 425-453-4100 Fax 425-453-1712 November 26`h, 1997 Ms.Jennifer Toth Henning City of Renton Municipal Building-3 rd Floor 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 RE: Setback Revision for Springbrook Industrial Center Dear Jennifer, Attached please find three copies of the revised site plan showing the new paving setback from Springbrook Creek at Springbrook Industrial Center. This plan reflects the paving and setback as it actually exists since construction was completed. As discussed with you yesterday,the required paving setback is 25' from the Ordinary High Water mark, therefore we are anticipating that a revision from 50' to 40' should require only an administrative review and an amendment of our Shorelines Permit filed with the state. We appreciate your timely response and your willingness to help us with this matter as we are trying to sell the building and close on December 12`h Please feel free to call me if I can be of assistance in any way. We would appreciate it if we could have a response by next Friday. Thank you again for your helpfulness. Sincerely, Dave essler - Project Manager CC:Deborah Berg-Tousley Brain John Solberg -Opus Northwest Bart Brynestad-Opus Northwest - k/ELOPMENT PLANNINr NOV 2 6 1997 Opus Northwest LLC is an affiliate of the Opus group of companies—Architects,Contractors,Developers Chicago,Columbus,Dallas,Denver,Ft.Lauderdale,Milwaukee,Minneapolis,Pensacola,Phoenix,Sacramento,San Francisco,Seattle,Tampa,Washington,D.C. 4. .._ . CIT' '__ .)F RENTON :.LL � Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 10, 1997 • State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 160th Ave. SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 SUBJECT: Minor Revisions to the Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit for Raymond Avenue Center ll File No. LUA-96-015;SA,SM,ECF/Shoreline Permit#1996-NW-10026 Dear Shoreline Permit Coordinator: Enclosed is a copy of a revised site plan for the above-referenced project. An ALTA survey conducted for the property revealed discrepancies between the approved site plan and the as-built condition. The approved site plan indicated a 50-foot setback from Springbrook Creek to the edge of the parking areas. The as-built condition indicates that a 40-foot the setback actually exists. Since the project is an industrial use in an Urban Environment designation, the minimum building setback required by the City's Shoreline Master Program is• 25 feet. The project maintains a 65-foot building setback from the water's edge. A Shoreline Substantial Development Permit was issued by the City of Renton on May 22, 1996. The Department of Ecology appeal period ended on June 14, 1996. These revisions appear to be minor, and this letter is intended to amend the Shoreline Permit. Please review this revision and attachments and call me at (425) 277-6186 if you have any questions or need additional information. . Sincerely, • (Pth Jennifer Toth Henning • Project Manager Enclosures: Revised Site Plan Shoreline Substantial Development Permit nau&kesslCr, cc: , Opus Northwest LLC • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 :.� This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer - . - - . . • IIIMMMMIIIIIW VICANIIT MP ii '00 i S.S.71 .. • ;— 1 1 1 1 , Ir71 Cilli 40 E . • , ty 0 v.,),0 ; • i2H.• c 1 1 MeV. -- 1 I 'Crl , , . 1 -'-k4 LJ -----•- [• , • • -'- . - . .• , g . 13 • . 3, . . • ..• , ; 1 'TS.'''''''' LI“:7.7; I I 1 P.,3 Z•F;!,1, EAN D I _... 1 --_. ,,, • , , ., , A R C E L ,,I. : ,,•:- ••}"..,1%; , j • Er _ __...• I . , . • 1 -,,:,,,. .—l\'''''\...,;-- -g;-;- • I In 1 • , - ------------------:-----• I • ' ' '' L'17.4.1'.:7-''.‘ca.1/4..\ - I . , , •''..,` \ • , I .,.." 13 win ',., \ . •E ' ,,,-- *,:•X ,„,/_"„:..:..-,1::,;--- ,..----.'..-.:k•••-:-.--, k. v•. • —•i_ 1 . . • NI.',. . . • —, _, n . / ,,•• ,„••••,/,,,7-. ' •,,':. A., i I fy i- -i .,,,,' /, '...:".... \ 2.---'-- /4„-•;-•; .•,,,,,-. ....,..„ ., , .,.. i•,, , , , \ . . . ••, , .., „ 45) /. q- i •,/,./ *.• . , -‘‘, ss s'•• ' \-.k\ I I , /-' - ' \s:‘, '''. 7.•••• CI-6 t i . ..„•.:;*- ./•%1''''V =...4i .: •./ , „;7/,akb„ . _ ,,_ / -'•ei .f,-,ri• o--./ ,.., Nv I , 7,,.,e9,,,:f ,ill ' \ -.`..**‘, . '..,:.•?\...:.„.,,, ,.... ...-' . -- /1 M WI g MEM MCA TATER - A ), ..,,, -0. s•Sgr w 6.• i,./ / ..v..;-. -; i i .: '-' 1 / i .... */ / , --.. . \ .‘. .;.',..''. 9ai t qc' / ,./7- . •••I ' MAN 1..1 WATER , .t.:...,'\.....f,':"--...,::---......":„___ Frif._-.7::: ::=1--.... ..,.._ .,.„,,,,_..._.,..-........,-• 1 11.4.•El.r.... /I : '-,_. -----:.;<•(;-z-e; ', FIZOPC=ItgIIIIIIIIIIMCUT ON ..„;‘,.. ' . ,• - -- -- -----_ ' DAMN* ,....,.... _. in. ; --•'--,-,--------r-------, ---'-----,':- ---. I / / / / /•\ • / ammr=“mimm..... , ,7 r''''' ! '---------• -•<,;- -.7---,..,;-.f,-,-%;"---..-->'---'I I, nr:'i 1,g:= , -If ••I.. •/ I `,.,, ' -.. Ae....i. I 11 ._._____':-.C_ '1 0 .;,',,f.,.-...il .1 .6/ ee i/ ...7' .4'. , ' -7A.:.---- AEI= P r\R L,:IL .'B ,:,..;,74/.-• .. .-• ,;.; v •. II illigirft,,,41141 ------------:--xt•-4-,s,,,_,•.„4,,..,-,-_-,:__Ili 1 Ili 1 -, / ..,,,,,,i' ..,,,,,,,;4,1_.---,•:,/,: ma ., OW:'....1 .„ : en.....Pftrlin•.— .v ---;'-Z-WW- ------- --_-•,_:__..j ,) I / j'aW.„_ ' ' - ••• . , . ,. , .. m;., :: :.,. eon 111 W v.e --.eiegiiN, . ,,,,--..--,-\\-..,„::. ,i....,,, 1 . -,----4, I • - . 111 — ...rip. / ; / / •/ ;1 " ---',-.6:, -0.' • 4.--- - • ..i ti'' •"•1 •''''''''' ;• -* -4 - - --- - '----— - .1:-- - wolgeirtniumiliftilizii!!a_i_killoriii_i__:_lit r' ;:=,- ; 7.-..zt.,-t....-- • .4.< ,/ • —__•_. ,_ r .. __ .;.,• t , ,(--, 1 , 1 Jroe 4 ------• p ,.,,. 1 WI- If AND-' 4:'.../ ,/ .: • I • r 1 1 e..•.•• „,-. ,- ' NOM 5 - X WI.4CEA VW POW ItIGN4t4t. I l loae ce MST.FWD X X 2 9.0.1JFG ARLA W.2.P. • •' ±>-,---}0.0441.6.WE LYE MI o• TM 6 020511.1. VN Pe10•121.9, a SITE PLAN LI, .Z..•.-., 1 1 , OCO.S.W.GOV. R6 I 40 B .1 . A' . Mt.DIM. 1.10FrI Mind/a.,• NOTE. . e0 0 u,1 z J ELECTRICAL MO I•rndak,A.ME 50:00e M.. .4 .. COMM, PM USG ENEMY CODE 61E0[1.11$T./.R..15 Lee TO OE OTT OP IENTOI ZOOti COX StersiTTED TO TFIE OTT OP KEW.FOR A 113.1.4NT e sheet ll..G.G1.1 PLATE=DM WOE IITROVITINT MM. PAK.WALL WES 8T.D.1,0 V•IV ori1 r PIM. r' . A1.1 • • tn P....61•1•DvIDED Oa VA.a ROVA 4 I.LG SULU/ • -- • . • • . • • • . CIT,. OF RENTON IL . Planning/Building/Public Works Department . Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 10, 1997 • Mr.David Kessler • Opus Northwest LLC 200 112th Avenue NE, Suite 205 Bellevue,WA 98004 SUBJECT: RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II--PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE APPROVED SITE PLAN(LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF) Dear Mr.Kessler: We are in receipt of your letter of November 26, 1997 and materials submitted to consider revisions to the approved site plan for Raymond Avenue Center II. The materials consist of an ALTA survey by Hebrank, Steadman and Associates(November, 1997), and the revised site plan for the Springbrook Industrial Center(also known as Raymond Avenue Center II(dated November 24, 1997). These as-built drawings illustrate minor revisions to the site plan with regard to the location of parking and circulation areas. • The approved site plan maintained a 50-foot setback from the Ordinary High Water Line for Springbrook Creek. Revisions indicate that building, parking and circulation areas shifted south approximately 8 to 10 feet. The setback from Springbrook Creek haschanged to 40 feet according to the revised plan. Development within "Urban" shoreline designations is permitted subject to the City's Shoreline Master Program. For industrial development, structures are permitted where they are set back a minimum of 25 feet from the water's edge. Commercial buildings must be set back a minimum of 50 feet from the water's edge. The revised site plan shows a decreased set back from the water's edge,but the project would still meet the minimum setback. The distance between the building and the water's edge is approximately 65 feet. Parking and circulation drives would have a minimum setback of 40 feet from the water's edge. • According to the City Code, revisions or adjustments to an approved site plan are reviewed to determine whether the revisions are considered to be minor, and can be processed administratively, • or, whether the changes are considered to be major adjustments requiring an amended application and a decision form the body that originally approved the project. (Major adjustments involve a substantial change in the basic site design, intensity, density, use, and the like generally involving more than a ten percent(10%)change in area or scale.) The documented modifications to the approved site plan for Raymond Avenue Center--II File No. LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF)are considered to be within the minor modification, or"10%threshold" for revisions, and would not require an amended application or review by the City's Hearing Examiner at this time. This determination is based on the judgment that the basic site design plan, intensity,density,use, and the like are generally the same, with no more than a 10%change in area • • or scale. • H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.INGUTH\OPUSRYMD.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 m T.ic nnnnr nnnf�inc�.n%rnrvrinrl mfnriel 9n nnc rnnm mnr Page2 December 10, 1997 The original conditions of approval and environmental mitigation measures are still applicable to the project. City Staff will forward a copy of the revisions to the State Department of Ecology to amend the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the project. This determination will be final unless a written appeal of the administrative determination -- accompanied by the required $75.00 filing fee -- is filed with the City's Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the date of this decision: See Section 4-8-11 of the Renton Municipal Code for further information of the appeal process. Please feel free to contact Jennifer Henning at (425)277-6186 if you have any questions regarding this correspondence. Sincerely, . es C.Hanson,Director Development Services Division cc: Parties of Record • • I • ,20',....... NCINITY KAP it, • "' ... vm.1.1..17,:t •.----..1 :,....,, ——— . _._ JL . 1 i /4 k.s fl7:I't*1,41'lI°C CTi.1§21 4 2 _ LJ • . 1 • I -11 ---erIrs• -.- . . • ,,....• • . : , - • , 1.._... • ., _ . . . . • - . 1 i . . , i . • • 'O., . , . P,A R C E'_ A , ..• 1 . . at , . _____•___________________ 1- ,, ,....- , - '...-.;....-a-,,E-R„..\. '.. 4 .. . ...,:..,,c,, ,..- / '.P.i.OiNSI'V•g.:.7'.„c... \ 0 181•11 I • ' ...'''' ,,..t',' ''''.1.--:a.7:-=-----.,---.%`=,... \ \. I I ! ` ' ,,,' ••,' ,,,.-.,: !..-..--i&7==---j.--::_'',,.. ,•,,, \ \:.kt.,..._,.L',.. ! ' r '''''- '-' '''.••\ I I 1 .7 \‘\'-:.•. "".\ . ; I I ' , ...- : ''‘?_'''*'• \ , ,I,. • . ••',,,,..,''' ..... ,\ ‘• . ‘.:i., \: I CD 1 `1` • , 1 . ,„ ,..; e,./.%„ \i'.'..: '• : /.,.. ot• -‘‘ ‘‘` \'''''t• to) •2= f ..//, • -'''",0,-.1.,I ',, • ' :, I a••6 • , • -/----_,._._r \ s's.‘ ',....,., '.... ,..... c',/ - Z k , --3. !------, \\,:\.‘....,.... , . , .." ,.. •, .„„.„...,„4„, _, . , ,.. ..../ ,,.. I , . --• •\ ,.. , ., -,...,-'. • P.1 1 4.',,P5'N A ! M wi g , .,. ,,,, ,... 1„.„. TEM 1.1.1.1 WM ,..........a,'!'- ' ! ry RK p , .. , ,,/, . nenza004..40.4coms ... '.-- \ ..•s....; p ,aq . • 4. 5h i I . 1 . \‘•P.,., .... '''...IP.f-,', • -.,...- s .',.-`Z'....:•.:k.f.' .. _ E1 ., ' sy /-'-{ - =t.i./ ''. ‘• ..,....1-' -,--...--.. •Ittt=',,,- ---''.. ,.... ...' . .... ' /1 I 1 I . 4 ' 1— . ...., •\--..-13.--:-..-----.-‘;.:,,---4-__•-.1z,-.--,,-1-..... _ ......-- WM 11.11.07. ..' ir' , ..,.. ' . ,,.. ..:...-1.•_.-•l'•:•-•-•--.,-L- • -.-,-- -,r2---"-''''-'--.-''''.. .... -•l'..r---'-:'‘\ \ ! • I ';•! Elf 1 •1.2.ASO / / , / . ; INILDIN6 • -- wzr; oot...." --..C.,2,-.:---7r,----4 -.-1:**,.. r ,..,--.-%71',._-_-C--.':.);11 1,4, .1' t I 1 _I - / /• / //t - tooTtk=sm. ?I .....,,. ..../ „ z.: P.ARC'L .,....!;,..., !pi iiiiii,jpet,ftka„ ------,,,,A.L.--..--r--A ,i,_______ii ,1, -4 ••• 1 , . .54- .. k, 44. t to.... 11•1*.4...1 _, .. , eort..4.1•ftil7sto lirt ' •••-','''',-'=-71 -7-11.-1-:c---,.7--,-._Iji'''I 1 I to/ :,* c• ...- F-..-Vmswerr-h— • ) ,.. , ol ' or. 4 . s'.\ •", ."\. ••••, 7:.... ''''‘,.. ,, • '): : ' . •-- .. • ‘..; • 71[2.2.91., - -- . 1.11/WW2 WWII. -- 4'- ., / '_------.-- ,,----- :--'---*.- : -- ---,-.---- " -• • / ---. 1, . • g . . . Wigs 7e -I ,- • - 2 '...141:-..42.11. i 2210....T.Mb • TR WA ION AOPEES L.O...L.10 LOT . ,s.„/40 1470440 5.1105.50 505 0 TM 010.51.12.211 .110.11.21.1.0. a SITE PLAN .:- -' I 20 owe552 455 1.1.1 o 5 •r --4.. . 2 0550540 GPOP R SI 40 5 ZOOG 06150 Lula 40.15545.5..,• r_,5,211 .1 _1 5 5,5,555,,...0 n,-.1.41pr 4 MG 5=55 O500( .0,041551a GM W. Mart COM 050.0.40 IL.05TO PE sheet cm GP Mid 7065 CODE 5.1551•119 TO 745 OTT 0 RENT.KM•11.1.1. ....1 OWE SAW.CLOL 050005 1.0.15. P4010 SiAll WET• 51.0.4.40 2•1212111 2 0.011.1.1. • . . WI.=.3.IV 112.1 2 0.2.4. ,T) All ,., - 1,4555 05515m in 504-1.5 n ac.vat.1.050, • . * • * • • • •• • . . • • CAG-96-091 'WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: [Asr Fief RI►'z*R Office of the City Clerk Project: ,,u a rt g5-14 do pk o var Renton Municipal Building AGREEMENT-AND,EA El E1�1T Work Order# 65 23 c r �� 200 Mill Avenue South FOR D) i) Adr CANNEL Pict •2 i 23 oy 9 c 2 o • Renton,WA 98055 Grantor: UPu5 • Jl l J. l {! 'SG Street t Intersection: Pq 5/.1 a .1\4 w,.a.%)4 : Sw 4., .}.. fl, G cn THIS INSTRUMENT,made thisl4.ttday of ``j '.' ` S 19' b; by and between Opus Northwest a LLC, hereinafter called "Grantor," and the C' OF RENTON, a Municipal Corporation of King County, Washington, hereinafter called "Grantee." That said Grantor(s), for and in consideration of ten dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the x receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by said Grantor, do by these presents, grant, bargain, sell, convey, and warrants unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, an easement for drainage with necessary appurtenances a over, under, through, across and upon the following described property (the easement area) in King County, N Washington, more particularly described as follows: o See attached EXHIBIT A for legal description _ a For the purpose of installing, constructing, operating, maintaining, removing, repairing, replacing, and using a drainage channel, together with the nonexclusive right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any a suit or proceedings of law . Following the initial construction of its facilities, Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: 11) Lo 1. The Grantee shall, upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement, restore the surface • Cj of the easement, and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work, as nearly as Le: practicable to the condition they were in immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. All restoration shall be performed as soon as reasonably possible following completion of any work and shall be coordinated in advance with Grantor so as to cause the minimum amount of disruption to the use of and operation tLo of Grantor's property of which the easement area is a part. 2. Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement as long as such use does not interfere with the easement rights granted to the Grantee. Grantor shall,not,however, have the right to: a. Erect or maintain any buildings, utilities, structures, and related appurtenances within the easement; or b. Develop, landscape, or beautify the easement area in any way which would unreasonably increase the costs to the Grantee of restoring the easement area and any private improvements therein. 3. At the request of the Grantee, the Grantor has revised its development plans for the easement area and the adjoining parcel to the east so that no improvements will be constructed within the easement area by the Grantor. To accomplish the said redesign,the Grantor will incur an additional cost of$25,079, as outlined in the attached Exhibit B. Therefore,to compensate the Grantor for this cost in exchange for this easement,the Grantee shall: a. offset a portion of Grantor's storm drainage system development charge in the amount of$25,079 that may become due for the Springbrook Creek Industrial Center proposal (LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF) or the Raymond Avenue Center proposal(LUA-95-064,SA,SM,ECF,LLA),whichever is implemented. b. allow the Grantor to remove and grade soil from and within the easement area for use as fill material for the construction of either of the development proposal listed in 3a above. Such activities, however, shall be H:DOCS:96-306b:SW:ps Agreement and Easement t,,T1AL Sheet 1 of 6 . I/73 PROPERTY SERVICES prohibited in that portion of the easement area lying within and 25' from the ordinary high water level in the creek. Final grades after the soil removal and grading within the easement area are not to exceed 3 horizontal to 1 vertical and any excavated area shall be graded so as to remain free-draining. 4. Notwithstanding anything set forth above, Grantee's rights under this agreement are subject to the rights of Winmar-Metro, Inc., a Washington corporation ("Winmar"), its successors and assigns, under and pursuant to that certain non-exclusive access and utilities easement recorded as instrument 9603151187 in the Records of King County, Washington (the "Winmar Easement"), insofar as the Winmar Easement contemplates that Winmar may install a bridge and/or other appurtenances over the creek, including the easement area, all, subject, however, to Winmar obtaining the review and approval of all governmental agencies necessary in connection with any such bridge, including the City of Renton. 5. Grantee shall give Grantor reasonable notice prior to Grantee's exercise of its access rights hereunder in the case, of any activities that may impact the operation of Grantor's facilities, business operations or activities on the property of which the easement is a part. Grantee shall coordinate its activities so as to cause minimum disruption of Grantor's and its tenants' business activities on the Grantor's property of which the easement is a part and shall cause its contractors or subcontractors to conform to all reasonable requests from Grantor or its tenants regarding minimization of interference or use of any of the access in parking areas on or adjacent to the easement. 6. Grantee shall indemnify and hold Grantor fully and completely harmless from any and all claims, costs, liabilities and damages arising out of this Easement Agreement or the use of the easement or the easement area by Grantee, its agents, contractors and employees (including reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in the investigation or defense of such actions). 7. In the event of litigation between the parties hereto, declaratory or otherwise, in connection with or arising out of this Easement Agreement, the prevailing party shall recover from the non-prevailing party all costs, including • reasonable attorneys' fees, paralegals' fees, and other professional or consultants' fees expended or incurred in connection therewith, as set by the court, including for appeals, which shall be determined and fixed by the court as part of the judgment. ll� lJ Ca H:DOCS:96-306b:SW:ps Agreement and Easement `�IxfTIAL Sheet 2 of 6 & PROPERTY SERVICES This easement shall run with the land described herein, and shall be binding upon the parties,their heirs, successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. Signatti/ess/of Grantor: l and ; and STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) D I certify that I sow or have satisfactory evidence that M#K IZq uulyogsr signed thi§ instrument, on oath stated that — 'she/they " v ere authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the rie 5 i Q CAJ1 of OPWS IVo,t- 0.007 L C to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ' Dated (v 1 II lob tttill S. 1.0U'',��ss��i L n ��I�\Sx0 N f - G� _ v �` ; tS a',o9 w Notary Public in and for the State w c o NOTARY N ® of Washington residing at Q�oYt�t,u., to,9 �'a� 7 Notary(print): E1J LijnJ 5. Lou ww.SR Nj\ '1 27 OJc' \t� My appointment expires: I i I a�l46 OF wrti' Approv as to Legal Form: CITY OF RENTON avo—,..atA.4..Pa1/1) BY: BY C) Lawrence J. Warren, Jesse T er City Attorney Mayor ATTEST: BY Marilyn J. Pe s 7 City Clerk v)� H:DOCS:96-306b:SW:ps Agreement and Easement INITIAL Sheet 3 of 6 PROPERTY SERVICES E/%Sr 1",0-f vaad Project: r- • EXHIBIT A Work Order# 65-23e LEGAL DESCRIPTION PID: LW=o • Grantor: 0 Pu r • STR: 241-23- y • Street Intersection: `r 11,1 . S R.ny,,.,4A AvE W Easement Area: That portion of Lot 2 of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LLA-95-064 (King County Recording No. 9508039005) in the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the south corner of said Lot 2 and the true point of beginning; thence along the west line of said Lot 2 the following courses: N 37°00'42" W 32.02 feet; thence N 55°28'15"W 83.16 feet; thence N 52°24'00"W 186.02 feet; thence N 54°03'57" W 280.51 feet; thence N 35°11'09" W 138.12 feet; thence N 23°44'21"W 81.38 feet to a curve concave to the east having a radius of 35.78 feet; thence northerly along said curve through a central angle of 52°20'28" an arc distance of 32.69 feet; thence leaving said curve on a non-tangent bearing N 50°08'30"E 107.69 feet; thence N 51°45'16" E 68.97 feet; thence N 59°39'11" E 93.78 feet to a curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 154.57 feet; thence northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 45°50'57" an arc distance of 123.69 feet; thence N 13°48'14" E 114.90 feet to a curve concave to the west having a radius of 334.26 feet; thence northerly along said curve through a central.angle of 36°45_26" an arc distance of 214.44 feet; thence leaving said curve on a non-tangent bearing N 23°47'30"W 104 50 feet; thence N 28°32'10" W 63.10 feet; thence N 20°51'33"W 41.80 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 2; 119 thence leaving said west line of said Lot 2 S 87°26'45" E along the north line of said Lot 2 140.00 feet; vj thence leaving said north line S 37°01'21"W 82.90 feet; ® thence S 23°47'30" E 96.43 feet to a point on a curve concave to the west, said curve being non-tangent to the LO preceeding course and having a radius of 384.26 feet,the center of which bears S 65°25'36"W; Fj thence southerly along said curve through a central angle of 36°45'26" an arc distance of 257.38 feet; 0 thence S 13°48'14" W 114.90 feet to a curve concave to the northwest having a fadius of 204.57 feet; CD thence southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 45°50'57" an arc distance of 163.70 feet; °I thence S 59°39'11"W 90.32 feet; thence S 51°45'16"W 61.54 feet to a curve concave to the east having a radius of 105.00 feet; thence southerly along said curve through a central angle of 86°56'32" an arc distance of 159.33 feet; thence S 35°11'09" E 88.78 feet; thence S 54°03'57"E 272.92 feet; thence S 52°24'00" E 185.41 feet; thence S 55°28'15" E 72.03 feet to the east line of said Lot 2; thence S 00°47'36" W along said east line 72.32 feet to the true point of beginning. Contains 90,418 square feet of land,more or less. H:DOCS:96-306b1:SW:ps Agreement and Easement na�Tlni. Sheet 4 of 6 PROPERTY SERVICES Project. i sr pc Si bWit1 �Cttk',C r . EXHIIBIT A CONTINUED Work Order# 5-23c. MAP EXHIBIT PIDL 2 L/2 3oy 30 2c Grantor: 0 ru 5 STR: 2--4/- 3-1/ 22 Street Intersection:sue+/3'" '- 10 kAti o,J0 SAC SW 9 ' Cy 23 8 ti 24 F 7 25 See Line and Curve Tables on Following Sheet 6 26 5 • 27 4 1n 28 0 0 1"=100' no 3 29 ,, 11111;;;111111.i i ( IN FEET ) 2 30 1 South Corner of Lot 2 H:DOCS:96-306b1:SW:ps • Agreement and Easement IAL Sheet 5 of 6 f7LE NAME. & l650251RA)IOND.C7RIESV7UORXDIOG/PLT PROPERTY SERVICES Project:2la�1- .5,0; v:u ,Ceve,C EXHIBIT A CONTINUED Work Order# fob 2-3 0 MAP EXHIBIT PID_ 24113 oy 9c2.o Grantor: 0 Pu 5 , STR: 2-4/Z30q Street Intersection: Su;!4 ill 5'1 g • (Z .Yek uo kV6 51-1 17 Northwest Corner of Lot 2 J 16 Line Table 18 ID# Bearing Dist.(ft) 15 I N 37°00'42"W 32.02 2 N 55°28'15"W 83.16 • 19 3 N 52°24'00"W 186.02 4 N 54°03'57"W 280.51 14 5 N 35°11'09"W 138.12 6 N 23°44'21"W 81.38 8 N 50°08'30"E 107.69 9 N 51°45'16"E 68.97 . 10 N 59°39'11"E 93.78 12 N 13°48'14"E 114.90 14 N 23°47'30"W 104.50 15 N 28°32'10"W 63.10 13 16 N 20°51'33"W 41.80 Curve Table 20 • 17 S 87°26'45"E 140.00 18 S 37°01'21"W 82.90 ID# Radius(ft) Central Angle Arc Length 19 S 23°47'30"E 96.43 7 35.78 • 52°20'28" 32.69 21 S 13°48'14"W 114.90 11 154.57 , 45°50'57" 123.69 23 S 59°39'11"W 90.32 13 334.26 36°45'26" 214.44 24 S 51°45'16"W 61.54 20 384.26 36°45'26" 257.38 0 26 S 35°11'09"E 88.78 22 204.57 45°50'57" 163.7011, 12 27 S 54°03'57"E 272.92 25 105.00 86°56'32" 159.33 21 C 28 S 52°24'00"E 185.41 in 29 S 55°28'15"E 72.03' Cj 30 S 00°47'36"W 72.32 0 taD 11 CI A 22 10 0 1"=100' 100 _._ .4 ( IN FEET ) 9 'ix 0y 23 8 , 24 F H:DOCS:96-306b1:SW:ps Agreement and asement INITIAL Sheet6of6 767� FILE NAME: LC 1650251RAYMONOCIR‘ESW760RY.ONC/PLT PROPERTY SERVICES Opus Northwest LLC � �e, .OPUS 20ite 205 h Avenue NE E /ii /m Bellevue,Washington 98004 206-453-4100 Fax 206-453-1712 • • • April 24, 1996 • • ti Mr. Ronald J. Straka, Engineering Supervisor Public Works Department ,icy• -' =`7 • City of Renton t� 200 Mill Avenue, South Renton, Washington 98055 • RE: Springbrook Industrial Center, Storm Drainage System Dear Ron: Pursuant to our meeting of 2 weeks ago relating to the possible widening of Springbrook Creek, Opus Northwest LLC would be interested in allowing an easement for a future widening of Springbrook Creek, subject to the following conditions: • 1. A mutually agreeable easement is executed. 2. Additional costs due to storm drainage rework, being taken out of the storm drainage SDC charge as proposed by the City of Renton. 3. Opus would be able to cut and fill the site as previously submitted, using soils from within the 50' setback. - • 1fj Please find enclosed data sheets from BUsh, Roed.& Hitchings onr the changes proposed in the storm system. Preliminary plans will be submitted to you under separate cover. The storm Ochanges pursuant to our discussions would be as follows:. • Add 534 lineal feet of 12"storm pipe at$18 per lineal foot or $9,612 CC • Delete 341 lineal feet of 12"storm pipe at$1.8per lineal foot or {$6,138} • Delete 485 lineal feet of 15"stormpipe at$20per lineal foot or . {$9,700} • Add 731 lineal feet of 18"storm pipe at$25 per lineal foot or $18,275 • Add 38 lineal feet of 24"storm pipe at$35 per lineal foot or $1,330 • Add 4 each type 1 catch basins at$850 per each or $3,400 • Add 2 each type 2 catch.basins at$2500 per each or $5,000 • Delete 1 each type 2 catch basin at$2500 per each or {$2,500} • Re-engineering costs for sketching, drawing and calculations $2 000 5, �Ce • Total additional costs $2- ZS� c-17 Arteua�2 1 r9`1b . traM Opus Northwest LLC is an affiliate of the Opus group of companies—Architects,Contractors,Developers Chicago,Columbus,Dallas,Denver,Ft.Lauderdale,Milwaukee,Minneapolis,Pensacola,Phoenix,Sacramento,San Francisco,Seattle,Tampa,Washington,D.C. • • OPUS. Letter to Mr.Ronald J.Straka Re:Storm Drainage System April 24,1996 If we cannot use soils from within the 50' setback, where we had initaially proposed biofiltration swales our cost will increase an additional $12,80Q00 • Please review this information and call myself or John Anderson at Bush, Roed & Hitchings, if you • have any questions. Assuming this meets with your approval we are prepared to finalize the storm drainage plans incorporating these changes, execute a easement with the City of Renton and formalize a agreement reducing the storm drainage SDC charge by $21,279. Please remember that time is of the essence to get all this accomplished. Very truly yours, Bart Bry estad Director- Real Estate Development Enclosure cc: John Anderson - Bush, Roed & Hitchings BB/mmj Springbrook:str4 24.doc lJ tiO MAY.-01-96 WED 07:49 OPUS ZTHWEST LLC FAX NO. 12GL9J31712 „. P, 02/03 • Opus Northwest LLC 01. .OPUS 200—112ih Avenue NE J Suite 205 Bellevue,Washington 96004 -1-1-7// /( 6 ( Tip)vzn 206453-4100 Fax 206-453-1712 May 1, 1996 Mr. Ronald J. Straka Engineering Supervisor Public Works Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Springbrook industrial Center, 19th & Raymond Avenue S., Renton Washington • Dear Mr. Straka: Please find enclosed a notice of additional work from Bush, Roed & Hitchings, my Civil Engineering for the Springbrook Industrial Center Project. 'Their quote is for the storm system redesign pursuant to our latest discussions. I had errantly given you the number for this work in my letter of last as$2,000. The actual price for this work will be $5,800. Please insert the $5,800 in lieu of the $2,000 in the letter I had previously sent you. As discussed you should now be preparing a draft easement exhibit and a letter agreement discussing the reduction in the storm sewer system development charge. Please.expedite this process as I would like to get these two items completed by next week. 0 Please call myself or John Anderson of Bush, Roed & Hitchings at (206) 323-4144, if you have any additional questions. / Very truly yours, • Bart Brynestad Director- Real Estate Development Enclosure B8/mmj Springbrook:stry 1.dcc MAY-01-96 WED 07:50 OPU,' )RTHWEST LLC FAX NO. 121 i31712 P. 03/03 2063237135 B.R.H. F-603 T-929 P-002 APR 25 '96 14:28 • BUSK ROED &HIICHiNGS,INC. • Notice of Additional Work No. 1 Attention: Bart Brynestad Date: 04/25/96 Opus NW, LLC Contract No.: 92233.14 Description: Raymond Avenue Center Work to be performed: Re-design storm system per city of Renton Reason for Work: As requested by city of Renton Work under this Notice of Additional Work will be accomplished: ❑ With no Change to the contract price. X For a lump sum Increase of$5,800 to the contract price. • o On a time and expense basis not to exceed$ without written authorization. o With work to start immediately on a time and expense basis. o With no change in the completion date. 0 o With completion date extended calendar days. 1/9 Performance of this additional work is authorized by signature. Authorization must be received prior to release of drawings. t. 0) Issued by: 9b H, Project Manager Date Authorized by: Client • Date i . N tWily "Fe STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office, 3190 - 160th Ave 5.E.'• Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452 • (206) 649-7000 June 7, 1996 Mark Miller or Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. J/A,�y4 10801 Main Street, Suite 100 �` 1 .7 ,99 Belle,de, WA 98004 •N w Dear Mr. Miller: Re: Renton Permit# LUA-96-015 • WINMAR-METRO, INC./ Raymond Avenue Center II - Applicant/Project Shoreline Substantial Development Permit # 1996-NW-10026 The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development permit, to construct a 99,635 square foot building, dock-high service doors for 20 trucks, and on-site parking for 128 vehicles, has been filed with this office by the City of Renton on May 24, 1996. The development authorized by the subject permit may NOT begin until the end of the 21-day appeal period, June 14, 1996. You will be notified in writing if this permit is appealed. Other federal, state, and local permits may be required in addition to the subject permit. If this permit is NOT appealed, this letter constitutes the Department of Ecology's final • notification of action on this permit. Sincerely, icr.ur Alice Kelly, Shorelands Specialist Shorelands and Water Resources Program AK:ak SDP.DOC cc: James D. Hanson, Renton 0 CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: June 14, 1996 TO: Bob Arthur,Jan Conklin erill FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning SUBJECT: Raymond Avenue South(a.k.a. Opus,Springbrook Industrial)— File No.LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF Condition No. 2 of the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit requires that the applicant furnish an easement to the City of Renton along Springbrook Creek shoreline for public access. Scott Woodbury has informed me that the easement document has been signed by Opus and is in the process of being recorded by the City Clerk. If you have any questions,please call be at 6186. • 1 \' 1111:lattc___I 1996 Renton City Council Minutes Page 221 d. Agree to construct a six-foot chain link fence along the entire east property line of the deeded area if and when the City's future channel widening project within the deed area is implemented; and e. Agree to provide and install perch poles along the creek if required by the Hearing Examiner for the said SW 16th Technical Center proposal. The above provisions will be set forth in the proposed agreement regarding right-of-way acquisition for drainage channel with Benaroya Capital Company LLC. The expenditure required for the acquisition based on these provisions is estimated to not exceed $160,000. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* City Attorney Lawrence J. Warren requested that Council change the word "waive" appearing in item numbers a and c in the committee report to "offset". MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL AMEND THE MOTION BY REPLACING THE WORD "WAIVE" WITH "OFFSET". CARRIED. *ORIGINAL MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED. Public Works Springbrook Utilities Committee Chair Corman presented a report Creek Widening, Raymond recommending concurrence in Planning/Building/Public Ave SW Acquisition for Works Department's recommendation that the Mayor and Easement from Opus NW, City Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement and CAG-96- easement for drainage channel with Opus Northwest LLC for the acquisition of a 2.0 acre easement along the east side of Springbrook Creek between SW 19th St. and SW 23rd St. The easement is needed for the future widening of the creek, as proposed in the City of Renton Surface Water Utility's East Side Green River Watershed Project (File No. LUA-95-205). The expenditure required for the easement acquisition is $25,079. There are currently no funds budgeted for obtaining the easement. Therefore, to compensate Opus in exchange for the easement, the Utilities Committee recommended concurrence in the Planning/Building/Public Works Department's recommendation to waive OFFSET $25,079 of Surface Water Utility system development charges that will become due for the development proposed on the property owned by Opus at 1901 Raymond Ave. SW (File No. SA-96-015). MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE COMMITTEE REPORT AS AMENDED BY REPLACING THE WORD "WAIVE" WITH "OFFSET". CARRIED. SAD East Renton Sewer Utilities Committee Chair Corman presented a report Interceptor SAD #0002 recommending concurrence with staffs recommendation that the East Renton Sanitary Sewer Special Assessment District No. 0002 be approved as amended from the original submittal to Council on May 6, 1996. The amendment to the Special Assessment District consists of a minor expansion of the northeast boundary of the district to include that area known as the plat of White Fence Ranch. The Special Assessment District will establish connection charges equal to $224.52 IENXPRIENEEIMENNEMEinegiiiimonomme CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIUNG On the 13ti day of •VV•-a..-t , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containin €s\N::•trektv‘e_ reArmct documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing • • 'Dept tcolociti pdtev-tAe.i CzttAcus VrojAt. hntklev- . Wtv‘wk6X— vv.ervio • 0(54.1..% nork4wxist u-c. (Signature of Sender) 11.)441..to.....k. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING I ,z.vp4 s,ig certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 54--A)DR4 K. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for tt1.0.4., purposes mentioned in the instrument. z ' 14 Dated: ht Notary P ic in and op the State of Washiff:, /4-R , Notary (' nt) ........ •My appointment expires: " .. • Project Name: --t>0 ktevw.e. cesAttir Project Number 96 .0\5, s4, ,siv‘ ,ecr NOTARY.DOC • STATe _:' v..4 py 1989 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office, 3190 - 160th Ave S.E. • Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452 • (206) 649-7000 June 7, 1996 Mark Miller Op at Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. B ''6 10801 Main Street, Suite 100 '0 19 Bellevue, WA 98004 0444 �6 Dear Mr. Miller: Re: Renton Permit# LUA-96-015 WINMAR-METRO, INC./ Raymond Avenue Center II - Applicant/Project Shoreline Substantial Development Permit# 1996-NW-10026 The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development permit, to construct a 99,635 square foot building, dock-high service doors for 20 trucks, and on-site parking for 128 vehicles, has been filed with this office by the City of Renton on May 24, 1996. The development authorized by the subject permit may NOT begin until the end of the 21-day appeal period, June 14, 1996. You will be notified in writing if this permit is appealed. Other federal, state, and local permits may be required in addition to the subject permit. If this permit is NOT appealed, this letter constitutes the Department of Ecology's final • notification of action on this permit. Sincerely, rr.e,(2,r- Alice Kelly, Shorelands Specialist Shorelands and Water Resources Program AK:ak SDP.DOC cc: James D. Hanson, Renton • CITY F RENTON "IL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor - Gregg'Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 23, 1996 • State Department of Ecology. Northwest Regional Office 3190 160th.Ave. SE Bellevue,WA 98008-5452 SUBJECT: Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit for File No. LUA-96-015;SA, SM, ECF Dear Permit Coordinator ' Enclosed is the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the above referenced project. The permit was issued by the City of Renton on May 22, 1996. We are-filing this action with the.Department of Ecology and the Attorney General per WAC.173-14-090. Please review this permit and attachments and call me at (206) 277-6186 if you have any questions or need. additional information. Sincerely, . • J nifer Toth Henning Project Manager Enclosures: Legal Description (Attachment"A") SEPA Determination (Attachment"B") Copy of Original Application ' Affidavit of Public Notice/Publication Site Plan cc: Office of Attorney General City of Renton, Transportation Systems City of Renton, Utility Systems • City of Renton, Code Compliance Inspector Applicant SHLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 TI.i___.._.___,_.__env.__.._i_..__.___. new---•----..--- CITY OF RENTON SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO.: LUA-96-015, SA, SM, ECF DATE RECEIVED: February 15, 1996 DATE OF PUBLICATION: April 1, 1996 DATE APPROVED: May 22, 1996 DATE DENIED: N/A TYPE OF ACTION(S): [X] Substantial Development Permit [ ] Conditional Use Permit [ ] Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW,the City of Renton has granted a permit: This action was taken on the following application: APPLICANT: Mark Miller(Mark Miller Consultants, Inc.) PROJECT: Raymond Avenue Center II DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit in order to develop a 10-acre vacant site with a 99,635 square foot building, dock-high service doors for 20 trucks, and on-site parking for 128 vehicles. The site is adjacent to Springbrook Creek. On-site recreation opportunities for employees would include an outdoor picnic area at the southeast corner of the site and an outdoor half-court basketball south of the western parking area. The development would be speculative in nature but would be suitable for warehouse, office and manufacturing uses as permitted in the Light Industrial (IL) Zone. Springbrook Creek is designated as an "Urban" environment by the City's Shoreline Master Program. A portion of Wetland "A" mapped on the eastern edge of the site is designated "Conservancy" environment. A 25-foot buffer would be maintained from Wetland "A", and the proposed structure would be located no closer than 45 feet to the edge of the wetland. In other words, no site development would occur within areas designated "Conservancy". A previous development proposal for a smaller building (81,250 square feet) and more parking spaces (137 vehicles) was approved for the site in May, 1995 (Raymond Avenue Center - File No. LUA-95-064, SA, SM, ECF, LLA). A Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for Raymond Avenue Center was approved by the City on June 6, 1995. The current proposal is a modification of the previous site plan and features a larger building. Revisions proposed resulted in the filing of an application for Site Plan Approval, Environmental Review, and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. As with the previous proposal, the site would be developed with a 50-foot wide buffer between Springbrook Creek and other site development. Under the previous proposal public access to and along Springbrook Creek was to be developed on the west side of the Creek at the time the western SHSBDV.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Raymond Avenue Center 11 Page 2 of 3 half of the property developed (west side of Springbrook Creek). Since the time of the approval of the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for Raymond Avenue Center, the western one-half of the property has been sold. As a separate action, the City of Renton has negotiated with the applicant for an easement along Springbrook Creek to enable the City to widen Springbrook Creek for flood control purposes. The City would need to seek and obtain a separate Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the widening of Springbrook Creek. At the time that the widening of Springbrook Creek occurs, a shelf would be created along the creek that would allow public access to and along the shoreline. In addition,the Springbrook Creek Trail will be developed on the west side of the creek, across from the subject parcel. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment"A" SEC-TWNP-R: S24, T23N, R4E WITHIN SHORELINES OF: Springbrook Creek APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: City of Renton Shoreline Master Program The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: Section Description Page 3.03 Shorelines of the City page 13 4.02 Conservation Element page 15 4.04 Public Access Element page 17, 18 4.05 Recreation Element page 18, 19 5.03 Conservancy Environment pages 20-22 5.04 Urban Environment page 22 6.04 Public Access page 24 6.05 Facility Arrangement- Shoreline Orientation page 24 6.06 Landscaping page 24 6.07 Unique and Fragile Areas page 24 7.11-02 Parking- Private Parking page 32 Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the mitigation measures established by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee and the Site Plan Approval conditions established by the City of Renton's Zoning Administrators (See Attachment"B"). 2. Public access shall be allowed to and along the Springbrook Creek shoreline.. This may be provided by means of furnishing an easement to the City of Renton along Springbrook Creek allowing public access, or by means of other easement or conveyance accomplishing this end. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof. SHSBDV.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department — Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Raymond Avenue Center 11 Page 3 of 3 3. A construction permit shall not be issued until thirty (30) days after approval by the City of Renton Development Services Division or until any review proceedings initiated within this thirty (30) day review period have been completed. 5/a A7.6 Planning/B it 1n ublic Works Administrator ate THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT DATE RECEIVED: APPROVED: DENIED: If Conditional Use, Section of the City's Shoreline Master Program authorizing the use: If Variance, Section(s) of the City's Shoreline Master Program being varied: This Conditional UseNariance permit is approved/denied by the Department pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and conditions: Date Signature of Authorized Department Official cc: Attorney General's Office City of Renton, Plan Review(Neil Watts) City of Renton, Surface Water Utility(Ron Straka) Applicant SHSBDV.DOC / ;; ' CITYF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 16, 1996 Mr. Mark Miller Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. . 10801 Main Street, Suite#100 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: Raymond Avenue Center II Project No. LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF Dear Mr. Miller: This letter is to inform you that the comment and/or appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the. above-referenced project. . No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 277-6186. ' For the Environmental Review Committee, Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc: Mr. Larry Capellaro/King County Drainage District#1 • • FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 cv. Aft WimWashington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North - P.O.Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 DATE: April 9, 1996 DEVCiOPMEN PLANNING TO: Jennifer Toth Henning 12.199v City of Renton, Project Manager APR 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RECEIVED Subject: SR 4055 MP 2 . 06 CS 1743 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-Raymond Avenue Center II DyLeffir441(4/t File No. LUA-96-015, SA, SM, ECF FROM: Robert A. Joseph on, PE, Manager of Planning & Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Ave. North, MS 122 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance for the Raymond Avenue Center II which, is located at 2000 Raymond Avenu South. Our response is checked below. We have reviewed the subject document and have no comments . The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. X The State recommends that a traffic study be prepared to analyze the state intersections that are impacted by ten or more of the project' s generated peak hour trips and also determine what mitigation measures, if any, would be required. If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter at 440- 4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section. • VE:ve filename DEVELOPMENT PLANNING' CITY OF,RENTON` KING COUNTY - • _ ,Transit Division APR01996 Department of Transportation' Transit Design&Construction Section,Environmental Planning&Real Estate ji§cEIV 821.Second Avenue, Seattle,WA. 98104-15.98 M/S 122 Phone:(206)684-1418',Fax: (206) ' April`5, 1996 , City of Renton Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager r ' 200 Mill'Avenue South Renton, WA. 98055' " DNS, Raymond'Avenue Center II- Project Number LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF , Dear'Ms. Henning: • , . • ' , I , King County Transit Division staff have reviewed this proposal and have the following , , comments.. , The closest service to this site is route 153 which operates on SW'16th St, north of the. , l ,• site. Route;153"operates weekdays during peak"hours: Further north on Grady Way are routes 163, 240 and 340. Route 163 is a peak hour peak direction route, but routes 240 ' ' and 340 operate,all day seven days a week. - - . If there are more than 100-full time employees who-arrive.between 6 a.m. and 9 a.m.; ' , this site may be subject to the Renton Commute,Trip Reduction Ordinance. If this is the , case, it appears that measures to support ridesharing, as opposed to more transit service, , would be best. Measures that support ridesharing include guaranteed ride home, HOV " - parking'and Commuter Bonus Plus. = , , Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. ' Sincerely, ' d Kra` . " Gary Kriedt,: t. '''.0 , Environmental Planner . g:\oap71:doc ' AFFIDAVITCURRENT PLANNING DIVISION •••••••••••• """""""• ••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••.. .................. ................. ................. •••••••••••••-•••• • • On the 2..'5 day of IVV)...14iA , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing • • Ttale\ re4ort Vd etty m K etkri4 documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Opus y\ov-444Lotigi- LL(.. MitleAr- )tin-vvuut (Signature of Sender) 93).ALtill_ kS.et,egr_K STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS • COUNTY OF KING . - I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that S * S-4e instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act foYthe uses4;arithifit*Vs mentioned in the instrument. • 24. Dated: a 1i/Y) tIA,• / ' • ilkaAv' • Notary Publin and for the State /Mingto9 iry /60 47/ 6242 Notary(Print) X0.4446,--, ..c My appointment expires: Project Name: vo.„...10Atria tige. cevckr.lx.. Project Number. 9(61 -015 , SA ,SNA% EC,f NOTARY.DOC .................................... .................................... .................................. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE MARCH 19 1996 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Sa Chastain, Comunity Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jim Hanson & Mike Kattermann Meeting Date: Tuesday, MARCH 19, 1996 Time: 9:00 AM Location: Third Floor>Conference..Room Agenda listed below. Boeing Buildings 4-45 & 4-79 Watermain Replacement(New) (Pywell/5586) LUA-96-01 7,ECF The applicant seeks approval to replace an existing water line on-site. Approximately 2,350 L.F. of 12" fire main and 1,623 L.F. of 8"watermain will be installed. The existing line will be abandoned in place. Location: Boeing's Renton Facility in the vicinity of the 4-45 and 4-79 buildings. Farwest Steel Distribution Center(New) (Henning/6186) LUA-96-022,SA,ECF The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of a vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building, a 660 square foot temporary office facility, and a 2,700 square foot office building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. Location: SW 34th Street, Between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue. Raymond Avenue Center II(New) (Henning/6186) LUA-96-015,SA,ECF The applicant proposes to develop the site for warehouse, office and manufacturing uses. The proposed structure would be 99,635 Square Feet in size. Parking for 128 cars and dock high service for 20 trucks would also be provided. Development would maintain a 50 foot setback from Springbrook Creek and a 25 foot buffer from the Class Ill wetland on site. Location: 2000 Raymond Avenue South. cc: J.Covington, Executive Assistant to the Mayor L.Warren,City Attorney (R) F. Kaufman,Hearing Examiner S.Carlson, Economic Development Director(R) J.Gray, Fire Prevention A. Larson, Fire Prevention(R) P.Pierce,P/B/PW Admin. is AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Jessica Folkerts , being first duly sworn on oath NOTICO NIVIEItrr F'ENVrFty states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the DETERMINATIQN" 44 Muncpa code:. ; ENVIRONMENTAL"REVIEW COMMITTEE RAYMDND AVENUE CENTER II VALLEY DAILY NEWS RENroN,WASHINGTON LUA-96015,SA,SM,ECF The Environmental Review Committee The licant (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- site forwarehousepro t�tl Yew the 600 S. Washington Kent, WA. 98032 I Significance— fufitigated for the falk►wing luring uses. The proposed structure a daily newspaper published six (6) times week. Said newspaper is a legal project under the authority of the Renton would be 99,635 Square Feet in size. newspaper of general circulation and .is now and has been for more than six Parking for 128 cars and dock high ser- i. months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the vice for 20 trucks would also be English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Wash- ed. Development would maintain a 0 ,ington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order foot setback from r from Creek of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County.' _. _ __ wetlandnd a foot buffer project the Class m on site. This project requires a f The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Valley Daily News Shoreline Substantial Development Per- (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers mil for development within 200 feet of during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a mond A Avenue SW.Creek.Cr Location:2000 Ray- ,. mood The 15 day comment and 14 day appeal Notice of Env D e t periods for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 p.m. on April 9, 1996. sures imposed by the City of Renton's Appeal procedures and the mitigation mea- ronmental Review Committee are •available at the was published on 4-1-96 Floor,Municipal Buildng,R Renton, . ton 98055.Phone:235-2550.You should be ed for said foregoing publication is the sum of prepared to make specific factual objec- ' The full amount of the fee charged 9 g tiio nsl.1Publication dates March 25,1986 and ' /(,, _ ' Ap , 1996. _ — Published in the V alley Daily News April $ 5 0.5 3 1, 1996. 1376• e I Clerk alley Daily News Subscribed and sworn before me this3 day of i/24p�-� 1 9 ...0,0ounmft,... e0.gth11-.,Yir‘.LqdLit:or a°y�tiN fi Fk — ' • gd .Z�.•'$�pjy Fy f� Notary Public or the State of Was ington 4 ;µ°s' -� Npa residing at Auburn 4 '<'o 0 i AR k .,% King County, Washington yA * . ti _1 pe�ig79C �e� 'R 2� 9 -7� 0 31 1 �• •f'WAS��' 00 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF The applicant proposes to develop the site for warehouse, office and manufacturing uses. The proposed structure would be 99,635 Square Feet in size. Parking for 128 cars and dock high service for 20 trucks would also be provided. Development would maintain a 50 foot setback from Springbrook Creek and a 25 foot buffer from the Class Ill wetland on site. This project requires a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for development within 200 feet of Springbrook Creek. Location: 2000 Raymond Avenue SW. The 15 day comment and 14 day appeal periods for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 p.m. on April 9, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Publication dates March 25, 1996 and April 1, 1996. •• Publication Date: April 01, 1996 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot • On the 2 day of YV'&i(1 , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing documents. This information was sent to: • Name Representing • fir' scolocri • cf i\aq_ • kyym AlslAer. rt of 1>a4td l.i E'Tannaan °F Igo 'uxvt .. -Rcsouat-P3t Lltc.k. AviNdelsovl 'Deft f -Tvansrotatttne, Su. . -Qwnne.vti cif Scat k Duw aVY% 1wate" %Le. e Ma ohn %1•ishevles YYW.Lkiesh (Signature of Sender) IALMNLIrt k. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify'that I know or have satisfactory evidence that's n 2 A k. S Q, signedtithis instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for uses and 4pd;F.os '0. mentioned in the instrument. � ,,`:; a'.' ail, /c1 C/(o w � � Dated: Notary PubliOn and for the State .it'/ as ington Notary (Print) (Vl 4) r\iR c ie r:,'+� My appointment expires: ' 6 �q-y y , Project Namesw:ti f‘tcC Project Number. 1(9 _015, SAA , cCc-,k NOTARY.DOC 4; - CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 20, 1996 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 SUBJECT: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on March 19, 1996: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA-96-015,SA,S M,EC F The applicant proposes to develop the site for warehouse, office and manufacturing uses. The proposed. structure would be 99,635 Square Feet in size. Parking for 128 cars and dock high service for 20 trucks would also be provided. Development would maintain a 50 foot setback from Springbrook Creek and a 25 foot buffer from the Class III wetland on site. Location: 2000 Raymond Avenue South. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on April 9, 1996. Following the end of the comment/appeal period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require, a reevaluation. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. If you have questions, please call me at (206) 277-6186. For the Environmental Review Committee, OtH4-01/14A/to fifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc: Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Sue Rumery, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) 0 Rita.Perstac, Puget Power • • AGNCYLTR.DOC Inn 1\4;11 OQfCC ;; CITY ._JF RENTON "LL �` Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 20, 1996' Mr. Mark Miller Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. 10801 Main Street, Suite#100 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: Raymond Avenue Center II Project No. LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF Dear Mr. Miller: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their-review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on March 19, 1996, decided that your project may be issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: See enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required 15 day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant)who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The required 14 day appeal period will run concurrently with the comment period. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on April 9, 1996. Following the end of the comment and appeal period, the City will finalize its Determination, unless comments received require a reevaluation. WAC 197-11-660 states that the responsibility for implementation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project, any mitigation measure established by the ERC not directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. Staff urges you to contact the various City"representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as. possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. Appeal procedures and mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at 277-6186. For the Environmental Review Committee, - • Fifer Toth Henning • Project Manager • DNSMLTR.DOC - - 200 Miiii Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055. [=1 TL.i.........................CIAO/......•..I...1.....1-.-:.,I O OZ......1..nnc•.r.n• - • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES'AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF APPLICANT: MARK MILLER CONSULTANTS, INC. (MARK MILLER) PROJECT NAME: Raymond Avenue Center II DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to develop the site for warehouse, office and manufacturing uses. The proposed structure would,be 99,635 Square Feet in size. Parking for 128 cars and dock high service for 20 trucks would also be provided. Development would maintain a 50 foot setback from Springbrook Creek and a 25 foot buffer from the Class III wetland on site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2000 Raymond Avenue South MITIGATION MEASURES: • 1. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at a rate of $75 per new average daily trip. The fee is estimated to be $36,466.41. This fee is payable prior to the -issuance of the building permit. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at $0.52 per square feet of•new construction, prior to the issuance of the building'permit. The Site Plan for Raymond Avenue Center II, File No, LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF is approved, subject to following conditions: - i CONDITIONS: • 1. The applicant shall submit a revised Site Plan that provides improved pedestrian linkages between parking lots and the building entrances in order to facilitate safe access for pedestrians and vehicles. This revised plan is subject to, the review and approval of the Development Services Division and must be submitted prior;to the issuance of the Construction Permit. A pedestrian connection should also be provided from at least one of the walkways on Raymond Avenue SW to the parking area. Crosswalks should be delineated in primary pedestrian access areas as determined in consultation with staff. 2. The .applicant shall submit a site lighting plan subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. The lighting shall be of a type and intensity so as not to impact sensitive areas along Springbrook Creek and wetland buffer areas. This plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a Construction Permit. MITMEAS.DOC/ CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF APPLICANT: MARK MILLER CONSULTANTS, INC. (MARK MILLER) PROJECT NAME: Raymond Avenue Center II DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to develop the site for warehouse, office and manufacturing uses. The proposed structure would be 99,635 Square Feet inisize. Parking for 128 cars and dock high service for 20 trucks would also be provided. Development would maintain a 50 foot setback from Springbrook Creek and a 25 foot buffer from the Class III wetland on ite. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2000 Raymond Avenue South Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General: 1. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City, state, county, federal and other jurisdictional. regulations, codes and policies governing the project and site. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate submittals prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, according to City of Renton Drafting standards. Permit- application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first$100,000, 4% of anything over$100,000 but less than $200,000; and 3%, of anything over $200,000. One-half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. • 3. The applicant is required to obtain a construction permit in order to accomplish site work and installation of site improvements. Police Services: 4. Police calls for annual service are estimated at 51.5, based on the size of the proposed building. The Valley area has been a target for theft of building materials and commercial burglaries since 1993. Police recommend that all building materials and tools be secured when not being used. Security lighting is recommended at the construction site. Temporary construction trailers should be equipped with heavy-duty commercial locks and auxiliary locking devices on any windows. Security lighting is recommended for the finished building and parking lots. Heavy-duty dead- bolt locks and peep-holes on back doors without visibility are also recommended. The tenant is advised to consider the installation of an alarm system or contracting with private .security services. The South Renton area has had an increase in commercial burglaries because the area is not heavily populated during the night. Police should be contacted to discuss site security during and after construction. ADVNOTES.DOC/ Raymond Avenue Center LUA-96-015,SA,S M,EC F Fire Prevention: 5. Preliminary required fire flow is 3,500 gpm. Four hydrants are required; one within 150 feet of the proposed building and three within 300 feet. kA 10-inch looped water main is required around the structure. The looped water main shall not be connected to the same section of the existing City main without intervening valves. 6. The City's Fire Mitigation Fee is required and is noted as a Mitigation Measure under the Environmental Review Committee Report Mitigation Measures. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of a building permit. 7. An approved fire sprinkler system is required. A fire alarm system may be required. The applicant will need to coordinate with City Fire Prevention to determine the necessity of a fire alarm system. All fire lanes would need to be marked according to City Ordinance. 8. The building shall be designed in accordance with Article 81 of the Uniform Fire Code for high- piled combustible stock. Water: 9. A utility easement at least 15 feet wide is required for the looped water main. A water System Development Charge (SDC) is estimated to be $51,157 and is payable at the time the construction permit is issued. Stormwater: 10. The drainage outfall to Springbrook Creek would require a drainage easement from District#1. 11. The Stormwater SDC is estimated at $26,410.431 Some adjustment in the fee may occur based on the on-site wetlands. 12. The City is considering the widening of the Springbrook Creek channel. This could affect the location of the proposed bioswale. The City would need a 50-foot channel easement for channel widening and to accommodate the channel slope. This would expand the channel into the proposed setback area. As an option, the bioswale could be replaced with a tightlined drain pipe since the site has both a wetpond and a detention pond. The City will work with the applicant toward an appropriate resolution. 13. An earth berm is proposed between the detention pond and deep drainage channel near the SW 19th Street right-of-way. Stability of the berm and soil conditions need to be confirmed and stated as such by the applicant's Engineer. Sanitary Sewer/Wastewater: 14. Floor drains are required when a fire sprinkler system is in place. The floor drains 'must be connected to the sanitary sewer system. 15. Backflow prevention devices are required on the sewer system if the floor elevation is below 22 feet in height(the height indicated on the plans). 16.' The sewer line from Manhole #1 to existing Manhole #2 in Raymond Avenue SW is to be dedicated to the City and the remaining line to the south is to be labeled "private". 17. The minimum sewer line slope is 2% as required!by City Code. • . 18. Wastewater SDC is estimated to be $35,311.93. ADVNOTES.DOC/ • • Raymond Avenue Center li LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF Transportation: 19. The fire lane would be required to be extended from Raymond Avenue SW approximately 325 feet to the existing pavement on SW 19th Street. The paved width of the fire lane is to be 20 feet, centered in the existing right-of-way. The subgrade and paved surface is required to meet the City's standard for Industrial Collector roadways, and have a center crown of 2% slope. The fire lane would need to taper into the existing pavement width. Meeting these standards would allow for the future widening of SW 19th Street as an additional access roadway in the future. 20. The project is subject to the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee and is discussed under the ERC Report Mitigation Measures. The fee would need to be deposited to Account # R 105.000599.000.3180.0070.00.000136. Parks and Recreation: 21. At the time that development occurs on the west side of Springbrook Creek, Parks will require a trail connection for the Springbrook trail corridor. No dedication of land or other parks improvements are required for this proposal. Valley Habitat Landscaping Requirement: 22. Applicant is subject to the landscaping requirements for the.Valley, whereby an additional 2% of the site must be retained as natural landscaping to provide for wildlife habitat per the City's agreement with Soil Conservation Service. ADVNOTES.DOC/ * - CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF APPLICANT: MARK MILLER CONSULTANTS, INC. (MARK MILLER) PROJECT NAME: Raymond Avenue Center II _ DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to develop the site for warehouse, office and manufacturing uses. The proposed structure would be 99,635 Square Feet in size. Parking for 128 cars and dock high service for 20 trucks would also be provided. Development would maintain a 50 foot setback from Springbrook Creek and a 25 foot buffer from the Class III wetland on site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2000 Raymond Avenue South LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 p.m. on April 9, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. PUBLICATION DATE: March 25, 1996 DATE OF DECISION: March 19, 1996 SIGNATURES: 2J/I 9 I0e-e�- /4 ri l% % Gregg mapp,,,,� dminitrator DATE Depart Planning/Building/Public Works m Chastain,Administrator DATE Community Service Department / Le e er, Fire Chief a DATE I Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC • . CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) • • MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF APPLICANT: MARK MILLER CONSULTANTS, INC. (MARK MILLER) PROJECT NAME: Raymond Avenue Center II DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to develop the site for warehouse, office and manufacturing uses. The proposed structure would be 99,635 Square Feet in size. Parking for 128 cars and dock high service for 20 trucks would also be provided. Development would maintain a 50 foot setback from Springbrook Creek and a 25 foot buffer from the Class III wetland on site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:. 2000 Raymond Avenue South MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at a rate of $75 per new average daily trip. The fee is estimated to be $36,466.41. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at $0.52 per square feet of new construction, prior to the issuance of the building permit. The Site Plan for Raymond Avenue Center ll, File No. LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF is approved, subject to following conditions: CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised Site Plan that provides improved pedestrian linkages between parking lots and the building entrances in order to facilitate safe access for pedestrians and vehicles. This revised plan is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division and must be submitted prior to the issuance of the Construction Permit. A pedestrian connection should also be provided from at least one of the walkways on Raymond Avenue SW to the parking area. Crosswalks should be delineated in primary pedestrian access areas as determined in consultation with staff. 2. The applicant shall submit a site lighting plan subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. The lighting shall be of a type and intensity so as not to impact sensitive areas along Springbrook Creek and wetland buffer areas. This plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a Construction Permit. MITMEAS.DOG CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF APPLICANT: MARK MILLER CONSULTANTS, INC. (MARK MILLER) PROJECT NAME: Raymond Avenue Center II DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to develop the site for warehouse, office and manufacturing uses. The proposed structure would be 99,635 Square Feet in size. Parking for 128 cars and dock high service for 20 trucks would also be provided. Development would maintain a 50 foot setback from Springbrook Creek and a 25 foot buffer from the Class III wetland on site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2000 Raymond Avenue South Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General: 1. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City, state, county, federal and other jurisdictional regulations, codes and policies governing the project and site. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate submittals prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, according to City of Renton Drafting standards. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000, 4% of anything over$100,000 but less than $200,000; and 3% of anything over $200,000. One-half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. 3. The applicant is required to obtain a construction permit in order to accomplish site work and installation of site improvements. Police Services: 4. Police calls for annual service are estimated at 51.5, based on the size of the proposed building. The Valley area has been a target for theft of building materials and commercial burglaries since 1993. Police recommend that all building materials and tools be secured when not being used. Security lighting is recommended at the construction site. Temporary construction trailers should be equipped with heavy-duty commercial locks and auxiliary locking devices on any windows. Security lighting is recommended for the finished building and parking lots. Heavy-duty dead- bolt locks and peep-holes on back doors without visibility are also recommended. The tenant is advised to consider the installation of an alarm system or contracting with private security services. The South Renton area has had an increase in commercial burglaries because the area is not heavily populated during the night. Police should be contacted to discuss site security during and after construction. ADVNOTES.DOC/ Fire Prevention: 5. Preliminary required fire flow is 3,500 gpm. Four hydrants are required; one within 150 feet of the proposed building and three within 300 feet. A 10-inch looped water main is required around the structure. The looped water main shall not be connected to the same section of the existing City main without intervening valves. 6. The City's Fire Mitigation Fee is required and is noted as a Mitigation Measure under the Environmental Review Committee Report Mitigation Measures. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of a building permit. 7. An approved fire sprinkler system is required. A fire alarm system may be required. The applicant will need to coordinate with City Fire Prevention to determine the necessity of a fire alarm system. All fire lanes would need to be marked according to City Ordinance. 8. The building shall be designed in accordance with Article 81 of the Uniform Fire Code for high- piled combustible stock. Water: 9. A utility easement at least 15 feet wide is required for the looped water main. A water System Development Charge (SDC) is estimated to be $51,157 and is payable at the time the construction permit is issued. Stormwater: 10. The drainage outfall to Springbrook Creek would require a drainage easement from District#1. 11.. The Stormwater SDC is estimated at$26,410.43. Some adjustment in the fee may occur based on.the.on-site wetlands.... 12. The City is considering the widening of the Springbrook Creek channel. This could affect the location of the proposed bioswale. The City would need a.50-foot channel easement for channel.. widening and to accommodate the channel. slope:- This would expand'the channel,into the . . proposed setback area. As an option, the bioswale could be replaced with a tightlined drain pipe since the site has both a.wetpond and a detention pond. The City will work with the applicant toward an appropriate resolution. 13. An earth berm is proposed between the detention pond and deep drainage channel near the SW 19th Street right-of-way. Stability of the berm and soil conditions need to be confirmed and stated as such by the applicant's Engineer. Sanitary Sewer/Wastewater: 14. Floor drains are required when a fire sprinkler system is in place. The floor drains must be connected to the sanitary sewer system. 15. Backflow prevention devices are required on the sewer system if the floor elevation is below 22 feet in height(the height indicated on the plans). 16. The sewer line from Manhole #1 to existing Manhole #2 in Raymond Avenue SW is to be dedicated to the City and the remaining line to the south is to be labeled"private". 17. The minimum sewer line slope is 2% as required by City Code. 18. Wastewater SDC is estimated to be$35,311.93. ADVNOTES.DOC/ Transportation: 19. The fire lane would be required to be extended from Raymond Avenue SW approximately 325 feet to the existing pavement on SW 19th Street. The paved width of the fire lane is to be 20 feet, centered in the existing right-of-way. The subgrade and paved surface is required to meet the City's standard for Industrial Collector roadways, and have a center crown of 2% slope. The fire lane would need to taper into the existing pavement width. Meeting these standards would allow for the future widening of SW 19th Street as an additional access roadway in the future. 20. The project is subject to the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee and is discussed under the ERC Report Mitigation Measures. The fee would need to be deposited to Account # R 105.000599.000.3180.0070.00.000136. Parks and Recreation: 21. At the time that development occurs on the west side of Springbrook Creek, Parks will require a trail connection for the Springbrook trail corridor. No dedication of land or other parks improvements are required for this proposal. Valley Habitat Landscaping Requirement: 22. Applicant is subject to the landscaping requirements for the Valley, whereby an additional 2% of the site must be retained as natural landscaping to provide for wildlife habitat per the City's agreement with Soil Conservation Service. ADVNOTES.DOC/ T . . CITY OF RENTON / prnrsvr'n CITY OF RENTON Report DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORIOR 2 I 1996 & ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& .`v�v® ors�vecs.s Decision ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE March 19, 1996 Project Name Raymond Avenue Center II Applicant Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. (Mark Miller) File Number LUA-096-015,SA,SM,ECF Project Manager Jennifer Toth Henning Project Description The applicant proposes to develop the site for warehouse, office and manufacturing uses. • . The proposed structure would be 99,635 square feet in size. Parking for 128 cars and,. dock high service for 20 trucks would also be provided. Development would maintain a 50 foot setback from Springbrook Creek and a 25 foot buffer from the Class III wetland • • on site. • Project Location 2000 Raymond Avenue South • Exist. Bldg. Area sf N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area 99,635 sf • Site Area 10.41 acres Total Building Area sf 99,635 sf \ C.D. HIL LPMIA,j\I , \ EA RIINIGTON GARDENS. . \ N� •\DD. rIY NIO I VALLEY DE ICE 1 I c_o "�Y. , T X LOT.11.0.0.y]pd0 as PARK TAM lOT s]A]00A.DOY!-0 p"��'TX� 0 C-0 7 , ,_ 1 -IV I I 'l�' C-Q 1 ./ I I ,'b \ 2 TAX LOT I0010AOA00p0 SGHET300' II I T \ _ • S. 19th Sr. , , 1�I TAX LOT N V230340143 / G I. c-o r • • BOEIING 1 Lh / . 3 COIMPANIY Gr I r H QW TAX LOT II LTD, o • o x / ///// 0- .� I O I I / / / f I TAX LOT.9t]06 00Tb0 ? I I SDUTHGATE O / 9 \ TAX LOT/242301.0020-0/ OrrICE PLAZA v / I P I //' i Li ___- 2"NN I I c-o .- - -_--- -. —. _ _ sara ST.' GLACIER PARK I I GLACIER COMPANY C PARK H-I . �`. H-I Pra J OLYMPIC PIPE LINE I OLYIMPJC PIPE ' 'TEERC.DOC COMPANY I © LI,i\iE CO. • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Determinati,-_ Administrative Land Use Action RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER zz LUA-96-015, SA,SM,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 19, 1996 Page 2 of 16 Part One: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND • Raymond Avenue Center is a speculative proposal for a site in the Valley portion of Renton. In May, 1995 administrative site approval and environmental review were conducted for a proposed 81,250 square foot building on the site. The proposal was granted administrative Site Plan Approval, and a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated was issued by the Environmental Review Committee. The project was also granted a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and a Variance for a reduction of a Class 3 wetland buffer in order to accommodate the entry drive. • The applicant has proposed revisions to the previously approved site plan, which are greater than a 10% change. The revisions propose a larger building on the site and trigger requirements to conduct additional environmental review and administrative site plan review. The proposal would result in the development of a 99,635 square foot structure suitable for warehouse, office and manufacturing uses as permitted in the Light Industrial (IL) Zone. As with the previous proposal, the site would be developed to provide a 50-foot buffer between Springbrook Creek and other site development. A minimum 25-foot buffer is provided between the wetland areas and site development with the exception of a reduced buffer width for Wetland C at the northeastern corner of the site in order to accommodate the extension of Raymond Avenue SW as the entrance drive. The reduced wetland buffer was granted as an administrative wetlands variance during 1995. Since the proposal is identical for the,;: site site access and effect on the wetland buffer, additional review of the wetland buffer is not required for this; proposal. Parking would be provided on-site. The applicant is proposing a total of 128 parking spaces, and dock high service for 20 trucks. Two drive-in service doors would be provided on the west building facade, north and south of the dock high doors. The majority of employee/visitor parking would occur on the north side of the proposed structure. Additional parking would be accommodated west of the building, but outof the required buffer areas for Springbrook Creek. Truck maneuvering in order to access dock-high doors would also occur in the paved areas located along the west side of the structure. A third parking area would be located on the southwestern corner of the site. - The building would be concrete with reveals serving as architectural articulation. Office areas would feature architectural glazing with a corporate entry feature. Proposed on-site recreational opportunities for employees include a picnic area at the southeast corner of the site, outdoor half-court basketball south of the western parking area, gravel path and bench along Springbrook Creek within the 50 creek setback area on the west side of the proposed development. Since the project is located in the Valley Planning Area, an additional 2% of the site as natural landscaping is required. The applicant has proposed to retain areas of natural habitat as wetland and creek buffers in order to meet this Code requirement. Development would include the removal of 3,950 cubic yards of on-site material, and import of 5,660 cubic yards of fill. Construction is anticipated to commence during the Spring of 1996 and last approximately six=.`• months. The proposal also requires a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. SITEERC.DOC City of Renton P/H/PW Department Environmental Determinati - : , Administrative Land Use Action RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 19, 1996 Page 3 of 16 Part Two: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1) Earth Impacts Construction and site preparation activities (excavation and removal of 3,950 cubic yards of material and import of 5,660 cubic yards of fill) could result in erosion and sedimentation. City Codes • require that the applicant provide a Construction Mitigation Plan and a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) prior to the issuance of a Construction Permit. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation required. Policy Nexus N/A 2) Air Impacts Construction activity would result in increased levels of airborne particulate (especially dust) potentially impacting air quality in the area of the project site. Emissions from construction equipment• would have a minor impact on local air quality. Construction impacts would be short term in nature and would be regulated through best management practices of the required TESCP. Vehicular emissions are regulated by the State of Washington. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation required. Policy Nexus N/A 3) Transportation Impacts The proposal would result in increased vehicular trips that would impact the City's road system. The applicant estimates that 486 new trips per day would be generated by the project. New average daily trips are subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75 per trip. Mitigation Measures The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at a rate of $75 per new average daily trip. The fee is estimated to be $36,466.41. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. Policy Nexus Traffic Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting Ordinance, SEPA SITEERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Determinati f Administrative Land Use Action RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA-96-015, SA,SM,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 19, 1996 Page 4 of 16 4) Fire Protection Impacts The proposal would be subject to the City's Fire Mitigation Fee, which is calculated at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. The fee is estimated to be $51,810.20. Mitigation Measures The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at $0.52 per square feet of new construction, prior to the issuance of the building permit. Nexus. Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting Ordinance; SEPA. B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF X DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-.SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at a rate of $75 per new average daily trip. The fee is estimated to be $36,466.41. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of the building permit. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at $0.52 per square feet of new construction, prior to the issuance of the building permit. ..._.. • SITEERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Determinati_,__,,f: Administrative Land Use Action RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA—9 6—015,SA,SM,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 19, 1996 Page 5 of 16 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental Information provided In conjunction with the environmental determination..Because these notes are provided as information only,they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General: 1. - The applicant shall comply with all•applicable City, state,. county, federal and other jurisdictional regulations, codes and policies governing the project and site. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate submittals prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, according to City of Renton Drafting standards. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection .of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000, 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than • $200,000; and 3% of anything over $200,000. One-half of the fee must be paid upon application,` for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There maj'• be additional fees for water service related expenses. 3. The applicant is required to obtain a construction permit in order to,accomplish site work and installation of site improvements. Police Services: 4. Police calls for annual service are estimated at 51.5, based on the size of the proposed building. The Valley area has been a target for theft of building materials and commercial burglaries since 1993. Police recommend that all building materials and tools be secured when not being used. Security lighting is recommended at the construction site. Temporary construction trailers should be equipped with heavy-duty commercial locks and auxiliary locking devices on any windows. Security lighting is recommended for the finished building and parking lots. Heavy-duty dead-bolt locks and peep-holes on back doors without visibility are also recommended. The tenant is advised to consider the installation of an alarm system or contracting with private security services. The South Renton area has had an increase in commercial burglaries because the area is not heavily populated during the night. Police should be contacted to discuss site security during and after construction. Fire Prevention: 5. Preliminary required fire flow is 3,500 gpm. Four hydrants are required; one within 150 feet of the proposed building and three within 300 feet. A 10-inch looped water main is required around the structure. The looped water main shall not be connected to the same section of the existing City main without intervening valves. 6. The City's Fire Mitigation Fee is required and is noted as a Mitigation Measure under the Environmental Review Committee Report Mitigation Measures. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of a building permit. SITEERC.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Determinat____ .. Administrative Land Use Action RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA-96-015, SA, SM,,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 19, 1996 Page 6 of 16 7. An approved fire sprinkler system is required. A fire alarm system may be required. The applicant . will need to coordinate with City Fire Prevention to determine the necessity of a fire alarm system. All fire lanes would need to be marked according to City Ordinance. • . %, 8. The building shall be designed in accordance with Article 81 of the Uniform Fire Code for high-piledA combustible stock. Water: 9. A utility easement at least 15 feet wide is required for the looped water main. A water System Development Charge (SDC) is estimated to be $51,157 and is payable at the time the construction permit is issued. Stormwater: 10. The drainage outfall to Springbrook Creek would require a drainage easement from District#1. 11. The Stormwater SDC is estimated at$26,410.43. Some adjustment in the fee may occur based on the on-site wetlands. 12. The City is considering the widening of the Springbrook Creek channel. This could affect,the location of the proposed bioswale. The City would need a 50-foot channel easement for channel widening and to accommodate the channel slope. This would expand the channel into the • proposed setback area. As an option, the bioswale could be replaced with a tightlined drain pipe since the site has both a wetpond and a detention pond. The City will work with the applicant toward an appropriate resolution. 13. An earth berm is proposed between the detention pond and deep drainage channel near the SW 19th Street right-of-way. Stability of the berm and soil conditions need to be confirmed and stated as such by the applicant's Engineer. Sanitary Sewer/Wastewater: 14. Floor drains are required when a fire sprinkler system is in place. The floor drains must be connected to the sanitary sewer system. 15. Backflow prevention devices are required on the sewer system if the floor elevation is below 22 feet in height (the height indicated on the plans). 16. The sewer line from Manhole#1 to existing Manhole#2 in Raymond Avenue SW is to be dedicated to the City and the remaining line to the south is to be labeled "private". 17. The minimum sewer line slope is 2% as required by City Code. 18. Wastewater SDC is estimated to be $35,311.93. Transportation: 19. The fire lane would be required to be extended from Raymond Avenue SW approximately 325 feet to the existing pavement on SW 19th Street. The paved width of the fire lane is to be 20 feet, centered in the existing right-of-way. The subgrade and paved surface is required to meet the SITEERC.DOC Cityof Renton P H PW Department •_ Environmental Determinat; & Administrative Land Use Action � � eP RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA—9 6-0 1 5, SA,SM,EC F REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 19, 1996 Page 7 of 16 City's standard for Industrial Collector roadways, and have a center crown of 2% slope. The fire lane would need to taper into the existing pavement width. Meeting these standards would allow for the future widening of SW 19th Street as an additional access roadway in the future. 20. The project is subject to the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee and is discussed under the ERC Report Mitigation Measures. The fee would need to be deposited to Account # R 105.000599.000.3180.0070.00.000136. Parks and Recreation: 21. At the time that development occurs on the west side of.Springbrook Creek, Parks will require a: trail connection for the Springbrook trail corridor. No dedication of land or other. parks improvements are required for this proposal. . Valley Habitat Landscaping Requirement: 22. Applicant is subject to the landscaping requirements for the Valley, whereby an additional 2% of the site must be retained as natural landscaping to provide for wildlife habitat per the City's agreement with Soil Conservation Service. Part Three: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION Report & Decision A. Type of Land Use Action x Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade&Fill Administrative Code Determination . r B. Exhibits is The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 2, Site Plan(Received February 15, 1996). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 3, Floor Plan (Received February 15, 1996). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 4, Building Elevation(Received February 15, 1996). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. 5, Landscape Plan (Received February 15, 1996).. Exhibit No. 6: Schematic Grading &Utilities(Received February 15, 1996). Exhibit No. 7: Neighborhood Plan(Received February 15, 1996). SITEERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Determinat____ 6 Administrative Land Use Action RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA-96-015, SA, SM, CF REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 19, 1996 Page 8 of 16 1 C. Consistency with Site Plan Review Criteria: In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31- 33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following Issues have been identified by City Departmental/ Divisional Reviewers: 1. GENERAL CRITERIA: a. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; The proposal generally complies with the Comprehensive Plan. b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The proposal conforms to the applicable zoning -- Light Industrial. Development standards have been addressed by the proposal for compliance with lot coverage, setbacks, height limits etc. The applicant proposes 128 parking spaces for the proposed use. Since this is a speculative building, and final dedication of building square footage has not been ultimately determined, compliance with the Parking and Loading Ordinance is based on the use as a manufacturing, warehouse, distribution center with some office use. Manufacturing use (not warehouse) requires that a minimum of 1 parking space per 1,000 gross square feet (gsf) of area and a maximum of 1.5 parking spaces per gsf of area are provided. Warehouse uses require 1 parking space for each 1,500 gsf of area. Office uses require a minimum of 3 parking spaces per 1,000 gsf and a maximum of 4.5 per 1,000 gsf. Based on discussions with the applicant, the proposal would result in approximately 20,000 gsf of office, and the remainder of the building (79,635 gsf) would be used for manufacturing and warehouse. Of the remaining 79,635 gsf, approximately 50% (39,817.5 gsf) would be warehouse and 50% would be manufacturing. Parking requirements for office stipulate that a minimum of 60 or a maximum of 90 spaces would be needed. Required parking for the warehouse use would be 26.5 spaces and required parking for the manufacturing use is estimated at 39 minimum to 60 maximum spaces. The minimum number of vehicular parking spaces required to meet the Parking and Loading Ordinance based on the proposed uses would be 126 spaces. The maximum number of parking spaces allowed for the proposed uses would be 176.5. The applicant proposes 128 spaces, which meets the minimum parking requirement and is less than the maximum allowed. The proposal complies with the Parking and Loading Ordinance. The project would comply with applicable development standards for lot coverage, building height, and setbacks. c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The site plan would protect surrounding sensitive areas, on-site wetlands, and would maintain a minimum 50 foot buffer from Springbrook Creek. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; See "c." above. SITEERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Determinat & Administrative Land Use Action. RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA-96-015, SA,SM,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 19, 1996 Page 9 of 16 e. Conservation of area-wide property values; Surrounding sites have developed with similar uses recently. The proposal would not result in decreased property values. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; Parking and vehicular maneuvering areas are generally separated. Additional provisions should be made for pedestrian safety on the site through improved pedestrian walkways between the parking areas and building entrances. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposal appears to comply. A lighting plan would need to be approved prior to issuance of the Construction Permit. h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; None anticipated to occur. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Appropriate services and facilities are available to serve the proposed use, provided required site improvements are installed. j. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. Development of the site with the proposal would effectively reduce deterioration and blight on the vacant parcel. 2. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES: a. Mitigation of undesirable impacts of proposed structures and site layouts that could impair the use or enjoyment or potential use of surrounding uses and structures and of the community; The site is adequately buffered from surrounding uses by existing wetlands, wetland buffers, and Springbrook Creek. The applicant has designed a project that would utilize the southern portion of the parcel for development of the building. Parking areas would be located in three areas to reduce the barren appearance of a large parking lot. Surrounding properties would not be adversely affected by the proposal. b. Mitigation of undesirable impacts when an overscale structure, in terms of size, bulk, height, and intensity, or site layout is permitted that violates the spirit and/or intent of the zoning code and impairs the use, enjoyment or potential use of surrounding properties; The nature of the site development program dictates a requirement for a large building. The proposed structure would be appropriately situated on the parcel to decrease size/bulk/height impacts, since the distribution building would be located in the widest portion of the parcel, and some stepping back of the parcel occurs which decreases the appearance of excessive bulk when viewed from off-site areas to the west. SITEERC.DOC . • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Determinat & Administrative Land Use Action. RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA-96-015, SA, SM,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 19, 1996 Page 10 of 16 c. Provision of a desirable transition and linkage between uses and to the street, utility, walkway, and trail systems in the surrounding area by the arrangement of landscaping, fencing and/or other buffering techniques, in order to prevent conflicts and to promote coordinated and planned benefit from, and access to, such elements; An appropriate transition would occur from the private entry drive at Raymond Avenue South into and through the project site. Existing site features including Springbrook Creek and site wetlands would provide buffering for the proposed use: Landscaping would provide for additional transition between uses. d. Consideration of placement and scale of proposed structures in relation to the natural characteristics of a site in order to avoid over-concentration of structures on a particular portion of a site such that they create a perception of greater height or bulk than intended under the spirit of the zoning code; , One structure is proposed. The building would have architectural features to diminish the appearance of excessive bulk when observed from both on and off the site. The structure would have a modulated facade facing west and would be narrower at the south and north ends to help diminish the visual bulk of the distribution building. e. Effective location, design and screening of parking and service areas in order to promote efficient function of such.facilities, to provide integrated facilities between uses when beneficial, to promote '.'campus-like" or "park-like" layouts in appropriate zones, and to prevent unnecessary repetition and conflict between uses and service areas or facilities; Parking would be located in three separate areas connected by a looped drive. Service areas would be concentrated on the west side of the site to allow for proper maneuvering of vehicles and separation from pedestrian activities. Natural and proposed site landscaping would soften the appearance of parking areas. In the largest parking area with 90 vehicle parking spaces, islands of site landscaping would break up the barren appearance and maintain vehicular circulation. Vegetation in the Springbrook Creek buffer would provide a backdrop for the 22 parking spaces located on the west side of the proposed structure and would provide an adequate screen. Additional landscaping islands would not allow for the needed maneuvering space for large tractor trucks. The 16 proposed parking spaces located on the south side.of the proposed structure would have perimeter ornamental landscaping as a buffer. f. Mitigation of the unnecessary and avoidable impacts of new construction on views from existing buildings and future developable sites, recognizing the public benefit and desirability of maintaining visual accessibility to attractive natural features and of promoting "campus-like" or "park-like" settings in appropriate zones; The natural vegetation present along Springbrook Creek will effectively screen views of the parking areas from areas on the west side of the creek. SITEERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Determinat & Administrative Land Use Action RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA-96-015, SA, SM,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 19, 1996 Page 11 of 16 g. Provision of effective screening from public streets and residential uses for all permitted outdoor storage areas (except auto and truck sales), for surface mounted utility equipment, for rooftop equipment, and for all refuse and garbage containers, in order to promote a "campus-like" or "park-like" setting where appropriate and to preserve the effect and intent of screening or buffering otherwise required by the zoning code; City Code requires that trash enclosures, recycling areas and outdoor storage areas be screened from view. The site plan identifies an areas on the west portion of the site and adjacent to the western parking area as the location for the trash enclosure. Screening is shown on three sides per City Code. h. Consideration of placement and design of exterior lighting in order to avoid excessive brightness or glare to adjacent properties and streets. The proposal generally complies with items e through h. A lighting plan is required prior to the issuance of the Construction Permit. 3. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF A PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE: a. Building placement and spacing to provide for privacy and noise reduction; orientation to views and vistas and to site amenities, to sunlight and prevailing winds, and to pedestrian and `. vehicle needs; b. Consideration of placement and scale of proposed structures in relation to the openness and natural characteristics of a site in order to avoid over concentration or the impression of oversized structures; The proposal generally complies with a and b. The site constrains development due to the presence of wetlands and Springbrook Creek. A north-south building orientation is the most practical for this site. c. Preservation of the desirable natural landscape through retention of existing vegetation and limited soil removal, insofar as the natural characteristics will enhance the proposed development; Wetlands and Springbrook Creek would be retained with the appropriate buffers, except for the small area of the Wetland C buffer that has been granted a variance in order to accommodate the entrance road. d. Use of existing topography to reduce undue cutting, filling and retaining walls in order to prevent erosion and unnecessary storm water runoff, and to preserve stable natural slopes and desirable natural vegetation; • e. Limitation of paved or impervious surfaces, where feasible, to reduce runoff and increase natural infiltration; ° f. Design and protection of planting areas so that they are not susceptible to damage from vehicles or pedestrian movements; g. Consideration of building form and placement and landscaping to enhance year-round conditions of sun and shade both on-site and on adjacent properties and to promote energy conservation. SITEERC.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Determinat__._ S Administrative Land Use Action RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA-9 6-015, SA,SM,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 19, 1996 Page 12 of 16 The proposal generally complies with d, e, f and g. The building would be oriented north/south and would not result in the shading of any public open space areas. Site constraints limit the building configuration to a north/south orientation. Planting areas would be grouped in planters and in areas that would not be subject to damage from vehicles or pedestrian movements. 4. CIRCULATION AND ACCESS: r� a. Provision of adequate and safe vehicular access to and from all properties; b. Arrangement of the circulation pattern so that all ingress and egress movements may occur at as few points as possible along the public street, the points being capable of channelization for turning movements; c. Consolidation of access points with adjacent properties, when feasible; d. Coordination of access points on a superblock basis so that vehicle conflicts and vehicle/pedestrian conflicts are minimized; e. Orientation of access points to side streets or frontage streets rather than directly onto arterial streets, when feasible; The proposal generally complies with a through e. One public access.point is proposed from Raymond Avenue SW. A secondary emergency fire access would be provided via SW 19th Street. A. looped circulation drive would serve parking, dock-high doors, and would also serve as a fire lane along the. eastern side of the structure. The primary parking area for 90 vehicles would be separated from truck. maneuvering and back-up areas near dock-high doors on the west side of the parcel. f. Promotion of the safety and efficiency of the internal circulation system, including they. location, design and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian access points, drives, parking, turnarounds, walkways, bikeways, and emergency access ways; The applicant will be required to demonstrate appropriate pedestrian circulation and to provide clear direction to pedestrians via striped crosswalks to avoid conflicts with delivery trucks and truck maneuvering that would occur on the site. The applicant will also be required to provide for a pedestrian connection from Raymond Avenue SW to allow access to the parking lot or the proposed building. g. Separation of loading and delivery areas from parking and pedestrian areas; Generally, loading and delivery is separated from the parking and pedestrian areas, with the exception of the westernmost parking lot which would be located directly across from the dock high door and truck maneuvering areas. A sufficient distance (minimum 100 feet) is being maintained as a separation between the parking lot and the dock high loading doors. h. Provisions for transit and carpool facilities and access where appropriate; and i. Provision for safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking areas, buildings,: public sidewalks and adjacent properties. • . No provision has been made for transit or carpool uses (h), however, the applicant could designate some parking spaces for carpool use in order to meet commuter trip reduction criteria as appropriate. The SITEERC.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department - Environmental Determinat=___ & Administrative Land Use Action RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA-96-015, SA, SM,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 19, 1996 Page 13 of 16 applicant will be required to demonstrate that appropriate pedestrian connections exist between parking areas, buildings etc. 5. SIGNAGE. a. Signs primarily for the purpose of identification; b. - Management of sign .elements, such as size, location and arrangement so that signs complement the visual character of the surrounding area and.appear in proportion to the building and site to which they pertain; I ,` c. Limitation of the number of signs to avoid visual clutter and distraction; d. Moderation of surface brightness or lighting intensity except for that necessary for sign visibility; and e. Provision of an identification system to allow for quick location of buildings and addresses. (Ord. 3981, 4-7-86) Items 5 a through 5e would be met through compliance with the.City Code. The applicant's sign plan must meet the Sign Code and is subject to the approval of the Development Services Division. 6. AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA(APA): N/A 7. HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT AND STORAGE FACILITIES: N/A • X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now makes and enters the following: -1. D. Findings 1) Request: The Applicant, Mark Miller, has requested Environmental Review & Site Plan Approval for development of a 99,635 square foot building for warehouse, manufacturing and office use. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. SITEERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department _ Environmental Determinat & Administrative Land Use Action RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA-96-015,SA, SM,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 19, 1996 Page 14.of 16 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 7. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal .is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Industrial (EAI). 5) Zoning: The site plan as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Office (Valley Office Park); East: vacant and offices; South: vacant and industrial; and:West:.vacant half of site, Springbrook Creek, and office (former Longacres). E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of EAI; and the Zoning designation of IL. 3) The proposal complies with the Site Plan Review approval criteria, provided conditions of approval are satisfied. F. Decision The Site Plan for Raymond Avenue Center II, File No. LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF is approved, subject to following conditions: CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised Site Plan that provides improved pedestrian linkages between parking lots and the building entrances in order to facilitate safe access for pedestrians and vehicles. This revised plan is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services • Division and must be submitted prior to the issuance of the Construction Permit. A pedestrian connection should also be provided from at least one of the walkways on Raymond Avenue SW to the parking area. Crosswalks should be delineated in primary pedestrian access areas as determined in consultation with staff. 2. The applicant shall submit a site lighting plan subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. The lighting shall be of a type and intensity so as not to impact sensitive areas along Springbrook Creek and wetland buffer areas. This plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a Construction Permit. SITEERC.DOC • • City of Renton P/H/PW Department Environmental Determinat_-. & Administrative Land Use Action RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA-96-015, SA,SM,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 19, 1996 Page 15 of 16 DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: March 21, 1996 SIGNATURES: • J. e .Hanson,Zoning Administrator March 21, 1996 3-2,r Michael D.Kattermann,Zoning Administrator March 21, 1996 TRANSMITTED this 21st day of March, 1996 to the applicant and owner: Mr. Mark Miller/Applicant • Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. ti 10801 Main Street, Suite#100 Bellevue, WA 98004 Winmar-Metro, Inc./Owner 700 Fifth Avenue, #2600 Seattle,WA 98104 Opus Northwest LLC/Developer 200-112th Avenue,#205 Bellevue, WA 98004 TRANSMITTED this 21st day of March, 1996 to the following: Bob Arthur,Land Use Inspector Jim Chandler,Building Official Art Larson,Fire Marshal Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney Valley Daily News Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration: The decision on the requested administrative land use action is being made concurrently with the Environmental Determination. The administrative land use and environmental decisions will become final if the decision/decisions is not appealed within 14 days of the date of the publication. An appeal of either or both decisions must be filed within the 14 day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). SITEERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental DeterminaL..,.. & Administrative Land Use Action RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA-96-015, SA, SM,'ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH 19, 1996 Page 16 of 16 REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before April 9, 1996. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen(14)days of publication. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 4-8-11.B, which requires that such appeals be filed t directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on April 9, 1996. Any appeal must be accompanied by a$75.00 fee and other specific requirements. . .t 7' 4 THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. . ti SITEERC.DOC i i AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION JPSSi r-a Pnl ira rt s , being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS" 600 S. Washington Kent, WA. 98032 a daily newspaper published six (6) times week. Said newspaper is a legal ; , newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the , English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Wash- " ington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Valley Daily News p . (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers • during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a - i - r maintain a 50 foot setback from Spring- Notice of Env De L brook Creek-and..a-25 foot-buffer from11181-° ' , Class III wetland on site. Location: 2000 t d Raymond Avenue South. The 15 day comment and 14 day appeal ; • periods for this project will run concurrently was published on 3 25 6 and end at 5:00 p.m. on April 9, 1996. ' The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of _ Appeal posed by the City of R nton's Envi- sores imposed NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ronmental Review Committee are available DETERMINATION at the Development Services Division,Third $ 44'9 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE. Floor,Municipal Building,Renton,Washing- t RENTON,WASHINGTON ton 98055,Phone:235-2550.You should be l + The Environmental Review Committee prepared to make specific factual objec-f (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non. lions. a Clerk, -Ile wily News Significance - Mitigated for the followin Published in the Valley Daily"News - !3 March 25, 1996. 1349 /� c / Y project under the authority of the Renton i Subscribed and sworn before me this Z? ay of Mal "�� 19 d �b 'RA Municipal AVENUE ECF CENTER II ��y ! The applicant proposes to develop the ;site for warehouse, office and manufactur- ¢ . . ling uses.The proposed structure would be , v��s��s. 99,635 Square Feet in size.Parking for 128 a,�s� O1j M F4-y cars and dock high service for 20 trucks a , '• ..••••••.• j Notary Public or the State of Washington would also be provided,pevelopmen2 would , SS�ON F-to••- 1k residing at > rfl�l / ooTARkt � •°�, King"County, Washington ! • i a • AS ' — OF iAS`�� 9go ' NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF The applicant proposes to develop the site for warehouse, office and manufacturing uses. The proposed structure would be 99,635 Square Feet in size. Parking for 128 cars and dock high service for 20 trucks would also be provided. Development would maintain a 50 foot setback from Springbrook Creek and a 25 foot buffer from the Class Ill wetland on site. Location: 2000 Raymond Avenue South. The 15 day comment and 14 day appeal periods for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 p.m. on April 9, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Publication Date: MARCH 25, 1996 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot 710 iti ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF , The applicant proposes to develop the site for warehouse.office and manufacturing uses.The proposed structure would be 99,635 Square Feet In size. Parking for 128 cars and dock high service for 20 trucks would also be provided. Development would maintain a 50 foal setback from Spdngbraok Creek and a ' 25 foot buffer from the Class III wetland on site.Location:2000 Raymond Avenue South. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. • AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. • n YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION UNTIL 5:00 PM,_ THE CITY WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL UNTIL AFTER THIS DATE. ' n APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING • EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, 'XXX I YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON APRIL 9.1996 OR PPEA I THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,APRIL 9,1996. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. " I \ i • _M1l�.i^IS ` ` 1 '� .V_-'fry I . '/ALI_=Y oPFI:E ' 1 i c.e �s 1 PJ,rIN , —i— I ' 1 `s° Li I: 1 1 [ 1,-,, Nr , n1 :TUNEr:1: / �� II urn C c.e I u� /AT% 1Jr4°1 O s 8 H I I I 5"^I'fi Ka 1T= v / 1 7 I //// I I ai FICE I'LS.ZA / II L_� , i --�....._........... GLAEPv i'AN(----„T— I I "t.'�i I r�� COMPANY i'l,.il x, D xx `' oLYI::C P.'I.LINE I!-] O'_YMPIC PIPE 11c] LINECO. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. •DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 'Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification: CERTIFICATION I, ,Sct.vd IA ,)&(I-SOYI , hereby certify that • 3 copies of the above document were posted-by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on IWIXt:h 22, 16101 to . Signed: 5'liU'lCIA JlLit ,,,, ' STATE OF WASHINGTON ) '~- �' ~v v ` p r t COUNTY OF KING ) - ;- i'- a , . I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that S(zt n, C. 'S u %4->^.z .'4 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free avotary act for'thb'kis.e and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ,...., . Dated: s ✓vA GuL,JA I Yl'1� ,,cj� _ ,�� Notary Public in nd for'the State W/a iington / 1lo L!/- /y t,22( 2 cr- ---C ..- — 6t7c. `• Notary (Print) WI,a g; k A.) Ski; 1 C (��-1 My appointment expires: h. cS_9 1 NOTARY.DOC • • .• : , . • .. . . .. \J TICE. ' . . . . . . .. . . . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II LUA-96-015,SA,S M,ECF The applicant proposes to develop the site for warehouse,office and manufacturing uses. The proposed • structure would be 99,635 Square Feet in size. Parking for 128 cars and dock high service for 20 trucks would also be provided. Development would maintain a 50 foot setback from Springbrook Creek and a 25 foot buffer from the Class III wetland on site. Location: 2000 Raymond Avenue South. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. • YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION UNTIL 5:00 PM, . THE CITY WILL NOT ' ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL UNTIL AFTER THIS DATE. APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, xxx YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON APRIL 9, 1996 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, APRIL 9, 1996. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. \ C D HILLMAINS • _.`,HINGiON GAF ENS. ' ADD J'V NO I a VALLEY OFFICE c.o �-0 s'4`' ,EM; PARF( I , I I '4: MI 5 ,..w, ..•smnsotr I d Tl♦- S tits ST. . 1, \//r T.L•If..2306.160 . �Q°1 I f �, °.° 3OEIING , .i, 3 � I I OMP\II`! GOV r. LOT! � I9� 4 STONEHEINGE a a) II LTD. < y SITE /a 1 /7- r P I I : t� // 1 souHGar_ 0 / 3 / I HI2 ICEIPL.AZA ' / I I • V i� .. ....... —. �.1—.0 ST: 1-I - GLACIER-PARK GLACIER I COMPANY 11 PARK NI © 11.1 LJ CU OLYMPIC PIPE LINE OLYMPIC PIPE P\COMNY 1© LINE CO. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. . DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION <::P.: as:e°include>;the': ro'ec.t;NUM.BER< .K .Oiji6 :for: ro .er:0.30 ::.....: . P.;.J. ..:.... _:.:.: .: 9...: .:::p:..::::;p...:>.::.:<:.<.::. entificattyon:=..`; ;::;::;;: .>I City o_'___Jon Department of Planning/Building/Pu_____larks ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: R,V4 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 11, 1996 ' APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 28, 1996 APPLICANT: MARK MILLER CONSULTANTS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II WORK ORDER NO: 78058 ii99 ION: 2000 RAYMOND AVENUE SOUTH SITE AREA 10 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 99,635 SQ.FT. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO DEVELOP THE SITE FOR WAREHOUSE, OFFICE AND MANUFACTURING USES. THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE WOULD BE 99,635 SQ.FT. IN SIZE. PARKING FOR 128 CARS AND DOCK HIGH SERVICE FOR 20 TRUCKS WOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED. DEVELOPMENT WOULD MAINTAIN A 50 FOOT " SETBACK FROM SPRINGBROOK CREEK AND A 25 FOOT BUFFER FROM THE CLASS III WETLAND ON SITE. / / li 3 A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts impacts Necessary impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land'Shoreilne Use Utilities // Animals Transportation // Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources - I Preservation I % /7 �7l' 9-/ t; L.,' B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS/ y� pA�A�� _claidzI �h �� 4 z/ q� �� m�� /` C,. lam` c/ 2t 2g'r� rr7 r2�.� 1�i '�/ c ,1� o/iv c5'O c/ 72; % e'-'77/2P C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional information Is needed to prope assess this proposal. 1 . %/!‘4)</Ce.P-etl6 ./ ,k c;3-1// Signature of Director or Authorized Representative 3 kk.*My u J D to DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10A73 City or:'/. . ;,.:ton Department of Planning/Building/Pul,;.,, /orks ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'Nicks COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 21, 1995 APPLICATION NO: LUA-95-064,SA,SM,ECF,LLA DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 10, 1995 APPLICANT: MARK MILLER CONSULTANTS, INC. PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER WORK ORDER NO: 79951 LOCATION: 2000 BLOCK OF RAYMOND AVENUE SW SITE AREA: 452,716 SQ.FT. (10.39 ACRES) BUILDING AREA(gross): BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 81,250 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a building approximately 80,000 square feet in size suitable for warehouse, office and manufacturing uses. Parking for 137 cars would be provided on site. Fifty foot setbacks from Springbrook Creek and 25 feet from the Class III wetland are proposed. The project requires Environmental Review(ECF), Shoreline Permit (SM), and Site Plan Approval (SA). A Lot Line Adjustment(LLA) is also being requested to create two lots, one on each side of the Springbrook Creek right-of-way. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics ' Water Light/Glare ✓' Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation ' Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Histonc/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation a ) //cz•vcl.5 cc x bit-) ajd-r roc, G?-1cr1c G' i`,kr,1-Gl a/01/2 7 �� L CSC B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS c--xr rii ci— fz IccctfccI Gii/W7dh /clime r � ?1c •u$- / c64.3 /C - /Z' a ic& /�'�Dc�e� ' ` cr)r tr4� Ct 1ti — c• 'i(n f . c ecis4c.ct ; t �-tC� cnc/ aS '7 �/3 c 77c•c, t e-764.)e-/ 5-4 aw/ / ,eQc 5/ce`-1 '7 hc-b p //1 "Mt t /c / ' �y4'•,ec C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS GCr ,7GI2''cL/70rl c.-of / /%s' 1-4 Yr—A.L / - 1 l( v! 51 rv2.�,-f G) CL- ) We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas i where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. -5igt5a�e of Director or Authorized Representative Dat Jfr' DEVAPP.DOC Rey.1 0/93 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 11, 1996 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CIT(OF: C Ir FROM: Rebecca Lind STAFF CONTACT: Paul Cohen (277-5578) REC O v ED SUBJECT: Raymond Avenue Center LUA-95-064,SM,ECF,LLA 1. Intent of the Land Use Designation The site is designated Employment Area - Industrial (EAI). This designation is intended to "create and sustain industrial areas which function as integrated employment activity areas". Primary uses in the EAI should be industrial, but secondary uses, including warehousing are encouraged. New industrial development in the Green River Valley should be well landscaped with provisions for safe and convenient pedestrian circulation. 2. Areas of Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan The following policies support the proposal. Economic Development Objective ED-C: Sustain and expand the current industrial and manufacturing (heavy and light) employment base. Policy ED-15. Develop strategies to attract manufacturing and industrial jobs. Employment Area-Industrial Objective LU-EE: Create and sustain industrial areas which function as integrated employment activity areas and include a core of industrial uses and other related businesses and services, transit facilities and amenities. Policy LU-195. The primary use in the Employment Area - Industrial designation should be industrial. Policy LU-196. A mix of offices, light industrial warehousing and manufacturing should be encouraged as the secondary uses in the Employment Area-Industrial classification with conditions as appropriate. 2. Areas of Potential Inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan i1 April 21 , 1995 Page 2 At the level of specificity shown on the submitted materials, no inconsistencies with the policies are noted. 3. Advisory As the proposal is refined, the following policy guidance should be considered by the applicant and reviewing City staff. Policy LU-162. On-site open space and recreational facilities in developments should be required while allowing for flexibility of design. Policy LU-200. Development standards should restrict the number and intensity of secondary uses in Employment Area-Industrial designations to insure the secondary uses do not significantly reduce the amount.of land available for industrial activity in the City. Policy LU-203. Off-site impacts from industrial development such as noise, odors, light and glare, surface and ground water pollution, and air quality should be controlled through setbacks, landscaping, screening and/or fencing, drainage controls, environmental mitigation and other techniques. Policy LU-206. Site plan review should be required for all new projects to ensure a high level of quality in site development. Policy LU-207. Parking should be located internally to the site and landscaped as appropriate to mitigate adverse visual impacts. Policy LU-209. Safe, convenient pedestrian movement should be encouraged through appropriate access and the location of facilities on sites such as covered walkways, drop-off zones, kiosks, security lighting, and covered bus stops. Policy LU-211. Site design and zoning designations should be used to protect environmentally sensitive areas in applicable industrial employment areas. Policy EN-10. Establish and protect buffers along wetlands to facilitate infiltration and maintain stable water temperatures, provide for the biological regime, reduce amount and velocity of run- off, and provide for wildlife habitat. A:\RAYAVCEN/OD City of‘____lion Department of Planning/Building/PuL;,�-4Vorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: CoAttima-um. LaoCOMMENTS DUE: MARCH 11, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 28, 1996 APPLICANT: MARK MILLER CONSULTANTS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II _ WORK ORDER NO: 78058 R19\1TON Ii®9TION: 2000 RAYMOND AVENUE SOUTH SITE AREA: 10 ACRES BUILDING AREA(gross): 99,635 Si.g19 2 8 N96 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO DEVELOP THE SITE FOR WAREHOUSE, OFFICE AND MANUFACTURING USES. THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE WOULD BE 99,635 SQ.FT. IN SIZE.VRKINGQRj1 C,n��44��AND DOCK HIGH SERVICE FOR 20 TRUCKS WOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED. DEVELOPMENT WOULD MAINTAIN A 50 ) SETBACK FROM SPRINGBROOK CREEK AND A 25 FOOT BUFFER FROM THE CLASS III WETLAND ON SITE. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Infonnatlon Environment Minor Major Inrormatlon Impacts Impacts Neee/s}ary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth i� Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LancYShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 1■1 '■■ � )/(�\) tJ/(�/t ///�) ■/�/�)/�J /yam/[j 1■l 5D (Lb � o kT Y VVO r T1 LObDU2 V1 D f 1& 6( t mVr( C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have vi ap catio ' particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise nd hay identified areas of probable impact or areas where a drG 1 i n n grope assess this proposal. n�f I to° Signatur o Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/B3 C I City 1ton, Department of Planning/Building/Pul _Vorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:^ �'. h COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 11, 1996 °OlR,, �1/�IASFIr1 im . �p APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 28, peg APPLICANT: MARK MILLER CONSULTANTS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HEWNRNIfl /96 PROJECT TITLE: RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II WORK ORDER NO: 78058 „0��s°twos I0e9otTION: 2000 RAYMOND AVENUE SOUTH SITE AREA 10 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 99,635 SQ.FT. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO DEVELOP THE SITE FOR WAREHOUSE, OFFICE AND MANUFACTURING USES. THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE WOULD BE 99,635 SQ.FT. IN SIZE. PARKING FOR 128 CARS AND DOCK HIGH SERVICE FOR 20 TRUCKS WOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED. DEVELOPMENT WOULD MAINTAIN A 50 FOOT SETBACK FROM SPRINGBROOK CREEK AND A 25 FOOT BUFFER FROM THE CLASS III WETLAND ON SITE. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable Mont Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth . Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare - Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation r/ Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation I B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio al information Is needed to property assess this proposal. . Signature of Director or Authorized Representative / Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10I10 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 11, 1996 , Bn TO: Jennifer Toth Henning Co M '7 a�� A FROM: Rebecca Lind al L -o.4' STAFF CONTACT: Paul Cohen (277-5578) SUBJECT: Raymond Avenue Center LUA-95-064,SM,ECF,LLA 1. Intent of the Land Use Designation The site is designated Employment Area - Industrial (EAI). This designation is intended to "create and sustain industrial areas which function as integrated employment activity areas". Primary uses in the EAI should be industrial, but secondary uses, including warehousing are encouraged. New industrial development in the Green River Valley should be well landscaped with provisions for safe and convenient pedestrian circulation. 2. Areas of Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan The following policies support the proposal. Economic Development Objective ED-C: Sustain and expand the current industrial and manufacturing (heavy and light) employment base. Policy ED-15. Develop strategies to attract manufacturing and industrial jobs. Employment Area-Industrial Objective LU-EE: Create and sustain industrial areas which function as integrated employment activity areas and include a core of industrial uses and other related businesses and services, transit facilities and amenities. Policy LU-195. The primary use in the Employment Area - Industrial designation should be industrial. Policy LU-196. A mix of offices, light industrial warehousing and manufacturing should be encouraged as the secondary uses in the Employment Area-Industrial classification with conditions as appropriate. 2. Areas of Potential Inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan April 21 , 1995 Page 2 At the level of specificity shown on the submitted materials, no inconsistencies with the policies are noted. 3. Advisory As the proposal is refined, the following policy guidance should be considered by the applicant and reviewing City staff. Policy LU-162. On-site open space and recreational facilities in developments should be required while allowing for flexibility of design. Policy LU-200. Development standards should restrict the number and intensity of secondary uses in Employment Area-Industrial designations to insure the secondary uses do not significantly reduce the amount of land available for industrial activity in the City. Policy LU-203. Off-site impacts from industrial development such as noise, odors, light and glare, surface and ground water pollution, and air quality should be controlled through setbacks, landscaping, screening and/or fencing, drainage controls, environmental mitigation and other techniques. Policy LU-206. Site plan review should be required for all new projects to ensure a high level of quality in site development. Policy LU-207. Parking should be located internally to the site and landscaped as appropriate to mitigate adverse visual impacts. Policy LU-209. Safe, convenient pedestrian movement should be encouraged through appropriate access and the location of facilities on sites such as covered walkways, drop-off zones, kiosks, security lighting, and covered bus stops. Policy LU-211. Site design and zoning designations should be used to protect environmentally sensitive areas in applicable industrial employment areas. Policy EN-10. Establish and protect buffers along wetlands to facilitate infiltration and maintain stable water temperatures, provide for the biological regime, reduce amount and velocity of run- off, and provide for wildlife habitat. A:\RAYAVCEN/OD f City o ton Department of Planning/Building/Pub orks -ENVIRONMENTAL & DEV'ELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1,0m COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 11, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 28, 1996 APPLICANT: MARK MILLER CONSULTANTS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II WORK ORDER NO: 78058 1/4.99T, ION: 2000 RAYMOND AVENUE SOUTH SITE AREA: 10 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 99,635 SQ.FT. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO DEVELOP THE SITE FOR WAREHOUSE, OFFICE AND MANUFACTURING USES. THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE WOULD BE 99,635 SQ.FT. IN SIZE. PARKING FOR 128 CARS AND DOCK HIGH SERVICE FOR 20 TRUCKS WOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED. DEVELOPMENT WOULD MAINTAIN A 50 FOOT SETBACK FROM SPRINGBROOK CREEK AND A 25 FOOT BUFFER FROM THE CLASS III WETLAND ON SITE. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS ' Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LJght/G/are Plants Recreation Land'Shorellne Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 Clz City a _ ;1ton Department of Planning/Building/Pu Vorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS (A)& eLiAt ,COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 11, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-015,SA,SM,E F DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 28, 1996 APPLICANT: MARK MILLER CONSULTANTS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTdiiKilKtrOYV PROJECT TITLE: RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II WORK ORDER NO: 78058 r":r';R•"9Vs�,' Ii.e9 TION: 2000 RAYMOND AVENUE SOUTH FEB2 8 1996 SITE AREA 10 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 99,635AS . SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO DEVELOP THE SITE FOR WAREHOUSE, OFFICE AND-rim MANUFACTURING USES. THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE WOULD BE 99,635 SQ.FT. IN SIZE. PARKING FOR 128 CARS AND DOCK HIGH SERVICE FOR 20 TRUCKS WOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED. DEVELOPMENT WOULD MAINTAIN A 50 FOOT SETBACK FROM SPRINGBROOK CREEK AND A 25 FOOT BUFFER FROM THE CLASS III WETLAND ON SITE. • ' A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities 114d�`� Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Servkes ' Energy/ Historic/Cultural ' Natural Resources Preservation Sets a-t-F a c,h ' ' v- Ye V I : Car-A-2.»• B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ( //• 5 7 2 C. CODE-RELATED We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10ID3 RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II RAYMOND AVE. SW & SW 19TH ST. W.O.# 78058 Rev. EIS Submittal March 1, 1996 STORM (Surface Water): 1. Out fall to Spring Brook Creek will need a drainage easement from District #1. 2. HPA (Hydrologic Project Approval ) will be require. 3. The System Development Service Connection charge is $26,410.43. Some adjustment in the dollar amount may occur if wet lands measure is documented. 4. Geotechnical report missing. 5. The City is considering widening the Spring Brook Creek channel which could have a impact on the location of the proposed bioswale. 6. An earth berm is proposed between the detention pond and deep drainage channel just off the SW 19th St. righ-of-way.. Stability of the berm and soil conditions need to be confirmed. SEWER (Waste Water): 1. Floor drains are required with a sprinkler system and the drains are to be connected into the sewer system. 2. Back flow prevention device is required on the sewer system if floor elevation is below 22-feet which has been indicated on the plans. 3. Sewer line from MH#1 to existing MH in Raymond Ave, SW to be dedicated to City and remaining line to the South to be labeled "Private". 4. Minimum sewer line slope is 2%. 5. The special System Development Connection charge is $35,311.93. 96CM047 RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II RAYMOND AVE. SW & SW 19TH ST. W.O.# 78058 Rev. EIS Submittal March 1, 1996 TRANSPORTATION ISSUES:. 1 . SW 19TH STREET: Fire lane is to extend from Raymond Ave. SW approximately 325-ft to existing pavement on SW 19th St. The paved width of the fire lane is to be 20-ft. centered in the existing right-of-way. The subgrade and paved surface is to meet City Industrial Collector roadway standards with a center crown of 2% slope. The fire lane is to taper into the existing pavement width. This will allow future widening of SW 19th St. as an additional access roadway in the future. 2. The Transportation Mitigation fee is as follows: $75 x (4.88 x 99,635/1000) = $36,466.41 Deposit $36,466.41 to Acc.# R 105.000599.000.3180.0070.00.000136. 95CM048 S Y �.r O .v'+::n.�...a LLN)] ........ .......v.... /: .. . • . . ..I : I N§F EEPPEmmo Project Name / \a o 116-Kkl. Ave, Ci iif e' L Project Address Contact Person 'It4` /V11//6 ( &Y.SLatf�u 5) >)C- D Address /L g[ f/„4L/�l/ . free f . i:e/7L /Jv , e//e Ofe 11)'-, 9 '1-- Phone Number ('p'& 42/5 1 '/7Z/ Permit Number 7g I/17 -e `� G` Wiz' �Zc d xi- Project y� �zeizitc / Description ai ��-- ,f (' Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: ❑ Residential ©-ITE Trip Generation Manual ❑ Retail ❑ Traffic Study QiNon-retail ❑ Other Calculation: 4 7 _' X Cam(, x 99, 63.6 J / 049 Transportation Mitigation Fee: 0 6, `L n Calculated by: �>�lrm 4, /lei -- Date: -9///74 Account Number: R, /05e 0U659 , 0o0 , �i64,36 06)7z)ipa, ovo/Y Date of Payment RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II RAYMOND AVE. SW & SW 19TH ST. W.O.# 78058 Rev. EIS Submittal March 1, 1996 STORM (Surface Water): 1. Out fall to Spring Brook Creek will need a drainage easement from District #1. 2. HPA (Hydrologic Project Approval ) will be require. 3. The System Development Service Connection charge is $26,410.43. Some adjustment in the dollar amount may occur if wet lands measure is documented. 4. Geotechnical report appears satisfactory. 5. The City is considering widening the Spring Brook Creek channel which will have a impact on the location of the proposed bioswale. The City will need a 50-foot channel easement for channel widening and to accommodate the channel slope. This will expand the channel into the proposed set back area. The bioswale could be replaced with a tight line drain pipe since the site has both a wet pond and a detention pond. We are meeting with the Developer Engineers to work to a solution. 6. An earth berm is proposed between the detention pond and deep drainage channel just off the SW 19th St. right-of-way.. Stability of the berm and soil conditions need to be confirmed and stated as such by the Developer's Engineer. SEWER (Waste Water): 1. Floor drains are required with a sprinkler system and the drains are to be connected into the sewer system. 2. Back flow prevention device is required on the sewer system if floor elevation is below 22-feet which has been indicated on the plans. 3. Sewer line from MH #1 to existing MH in Raymond Ave, SW to be dedicated to City and remaining line to the South to be labeled "Private". 4. Minimum sewer line slope is 2%. 5. The special System Development Connection charge is $35,311.93. 96CM047 City 'ton Department of Planning/Building/PUJ Vorks ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'Ply Pevteuj > LLkiltirCOMMENTS DUE: MARCH 11, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 28, 1996 QF RENTON APPLICANT: MARK MILLER CONSULTANTS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNIt�G,�,�A , D 'Iw a PROJECT TITLE: RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II WORK ORDER NO: 78058 it%it 0 b 1J96 Ite9TION: 2000 RAYMOND AVENUE SOUTH SITE AREA 10 ACRES BUILDING AREA(gross): 99,635 SQ.FT:-"'-n.selvG SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO DEVELOP THE SITE FOR WAREHOUSE, OFFICE AND MANUFACTURING USES. THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE WOULD BE 99,635 SQ.FT. IN SIZE. PARKING FOR 128 CARS AND DOCK HIGH SERVICE FOR 20 TRUCKS WOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED. DEVELOPMENT WOULD MAINTAIN A 50 FOOT SETBACK FROM SPRINGBROOK CREEK AND A 25 FOOT BUFFER FROM THE CLASS III WETLAND ON SITE. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary • Earth Housing Air _Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistoriclCultural Natural Resources Preservation B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Reg 1:4 vec1 4li v- ci40_,.) is 3500 isj a o I h recq u ( re.5 a G, toot) W o�� I i t -e, c� e L t-c� IX< < L e-- /.1-f>C r -6 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS I r 4 V t IT; r-U e sc->k/r7. ( S T„`S 1 1- IL l w.IiCcTGb` /6-Poof' sd�h p. e . -,eYtt h ."-1) '?114cr?) CI o l.o e a d 7.1.3 crrv,5-fir o s t Ss cieA We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where rtional information is needed property assess this proposal. �I '1--41 /1 f 6 Signature of Director or Authorized Represents Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10093 Cityof l7enton Department of Planning/Building/Pub orks P ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: t 11(e_ Rene A+ CM COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 11, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 28;°1996,,,F,,,, APPLICANT: MARK MILLER CONSULTANTS PROJECT MANAGER: JENIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II WORK ORDER NO: 78058 FEB e i 1.@9TION: 2000 RAYMOND AVENUE SOUTH ,�.�_...,; _, A; ; �j;� �� I'11L�`ilvu �, ��— SITE AREA: 10 ACRES BUILDING AREA(gross): 99,635 SQ.FT. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO DEVELOP THE SITE FOR WAREHOUSE, OFFICE AND MANUFACTURING USES. THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE WOULD BE 99,635 SQ.FT. IN SIZE. PARKING FOR 128 CARS AND DOCK HIGH SERVICE FOR 20 TRUCKS WOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED. DEVELOPMENT WOULD MAINTAIN A 50 FOOT SETBACK FROM SPRINGBROOK CREEK AND A 25 FOOT BUFFER FROM THE CLASS III WETLAND ON SITE. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More ' Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Wafer Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources. Preservation ' B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS See aik Q �� ter-�Q ,, ciao /'t c q y (°196. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to pro assess this proposal. % 12._ 3 /q/96 Signature of Director or Authorized Representati Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 111 Oti�Y Obi . " ♦ CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: March 4, 1996 TO: Jennifer Henning - Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas - Plan Review Inspector SUBJECT: Code-Related Comments for Raymond Avenue Center 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 3,500 gpm for the above-subject project. Four hydrants are required; one hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and three hydrants are required within 300-feet of the proposed structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. The looped main shall not be connected to the same section of the existing city main without intervening valves. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of building - 99,635 square feet x $0.52 = $51,810.20. This fee is payable at the time the building permit is issued. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 4. Further details are necessary in order to determine whether or not an approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 5. The building shall be designed in accordance with Article 81 of the Uniform Fire Code for high-piled combustible stock. 6. All fire lanes shall be marked according to the City Ordinance. If you have any further question, please contact me on extension 2524. CWT:mbt raymd r City of_._�,Jton Department of Planning/Building/Pul_ ,Yorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pAlCe COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 11, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 28, 1996 APPLICANT: MARK MILLER CONSULTANTS PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II WORK ORDER NO: 78058 1te9FION: 2000 RAYMOND AVENUE SOUTH SITE AREA 10 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): 99,635 SQ.FT. S S L CF% SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO DEVELOP THE SITE FOR WAREHOUSE, OFFICE AND MANUFACTURING USES. THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE WOULD BE 99,635 SQ.FT. IN SIZE. PARKING FOR 128 CARS AND DOCK HIGH SERVICE FOR 20 TRUCKS WOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED. DEVELOPMENT WOULD MAINTAIN A 50 FOOT SETBACK FROM SPRINGBROOK CREEK AND A 25 FOOT BUFFER FROM THE CLASS III WETLAND ON SITE. Q A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS ^ � Element of the Probable Probable More Bement of the Probable 'IW Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Wafer Light/Glare Plants Recreation LancMShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services X X Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Police cal §s for service estimated at 51 . 51 annually , based on the size of the proposed building. This area of Renton has been plagued by thefts of building materials and commercial burglaries for the past 1 1/2 years . Recommend the builder secure all building materials when they are not in use , provide security lighting at the construction site„ lock op all tools , and secure any temporary construction trailers with heavy duty commercial locks and auxiliary locking devices on any windows . Once the site is constructed , it will need security lighting around the building B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS and in the parking lots , doors will need heavy-duty dead-bolt locks , and any back doors that don ' t have an adjacent window will need peep-holes fgr employees to be able to view the parking lots before exiting the building. Recommend the tenant install an alarm system or consider the services of pri :ut =,s.ecurity . The , South Renton area has a large number of commercial burglaries because the area is relatively deserted at night , and the burglars know they can break into businesses quickly , easily , and probably not be detected until an employee comes to work in the morning. ' C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this appication with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impactor areas where additional Information Is needed to property assess this proposal. adAl SI nature of Director or authorized -epresentative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 l .t. f ,::..;•::tt;r::;•£;};i }};to'::4''t;+, .\ti.....:,::itt:+••irr'•}:ryr>:t•:••:ry>}:ri ti.:ii••.:::.::,t::+:a:,,•::i.:;:..•.<.�:::.;:.i:...,..t:....:..:..:.::...; ..:tiw,•,�,;3:;3:S:i':.':rrr}'ri:,,•,,,l.:rr•.�.:,•:\•:ti•.C:,v,. \ . .siai•T.rr;r,•::ii:.::.t•ix<i.:•: . ....:: i \;,?fi: .:/.:tNfr:;%::..: _ �ti\\"4\k�<::::•:+ V,':}:;.;::.. ryr.....•4ti..,:i:.i.:..,::i.::a::/;.y:::;.::......+� \ \*r•••ti.a::. :n::.it•,.i:ta:, }:: .: ~....::}a�+iS'�a ii•4:;a}:.:::i?x,.s:}.:la:•.i::.};•;k}c�ry}}::• :•}2 #';Ct'ff..•':>}:.:;;,:.:.},.,..ti.:...(u n •,,.i,.:ix:..:::a.::.:,-::J/•..::,•::r:::::i::,.ai: \.?..�:::r•r?:r.rr:•i:•:i:i•••..fir..•n`n.'•:.. .tiT`•�.,{` • i t'}" nv ^ \n••x...,vv.:.;.. f....::::•�•::.:i..v.:r...::: \�\ 'lea,-• .k,r ri. ?: fiFj :C;i•.'i::r {ti:}:}.f;:•}itff.:v/:., ?%i:•>C}:?;:iiii}\S\ \\\ti�'•r + :C{:'.fi /f' }^; <Y''.Y:+.a:c;:A:.:;.a4c,*.•t„,;\\\\,3�.i:,':y.;r,`.: ■66■,,■lyy�1 +MM,��-{,,{yyLL • ■- py► �N• „1rl• }}}{.. :\:,4-..•t,•f:�ln.':4.n �:ati l� �IN....Ir::IlJ11M:T ` ��.��+:� if�!7':{$� +�i .\ \� ,� • •.'ri., :;:;5:•. i,r{,'�4,aX { rcy \giiy`r ,',�`:;; '2•'s$ti} •' � •sS'>3kv •Ci�,� \\�\. �� GKY+�r A•:�:a.Y�,.<i•:inrv4YF.i.,}.}ri�:SiY:� ,nY 44 � ,{)•iY:{./l/.Uf >v.'., \ \�:}\\ v. 3t �v}}}}:•r.'i}}:;.r:t•.,•;!:,:;r' . ...a.} .'�'4\\�••• :4}a::a}...::•:ot:•ra.,:r4:•::i•:.,,C \4', ♦ .+. : - :+.fi'y,;;1•.?;.}.::::ar.:.rr•:ri•``i:f :'{•�c::+: :\r}.t,. .�, i ;�r>,43.,,,r'•�;:�, .:r.:: �;\\ ,443 : '•hR•.�':Fi4i � \ \. ``S...*c`:•� \ : b\ .:t •.}}.,. • •}}};?:a4:r},}>`..:.n.;t./,}i.:.:t;a;:•}}%'},• 4ti\,c::;o:::o:•: . # .J»,riprt.+"�-\i,. \�\}�\?n'�` :^?:+.i-:}::•f.}4;/,.::ivnv:a:}r�Li•:fAi:a:.r+:�}(•\v.?�,�+,.?�,.,�n�42�\•\}.v:vrr}:{{iif-Y!tl[:'rYT'.lT..i��.-l .fiY� �'�y}��{'��b `' nd�IXa{OL,ny� � ................ ..}.. .,. .:.............:........�.�..:..........{..::......:.....:.;,-:�.?T,�T�T..T..F:Y�i9N:n:n.Cri:::ri0.`}2.�\ m:::.Y•.':+ '-,+�i}a,��iQT}-=`v.2': PROJECT NAME: "C 6vti 1D APPLICATION NO:• 16'r 0115 I SR'r IrS/v�s.E The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. ' NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER GEE. - -� ,�- . . .. • • • • • wEcovED FEB 1 5 1996 DEVECITY OF LOPFAENTReNTOtd PLAh11JIIJG \', r. o • N ::;•c0:_� o u �7 0 A • (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) I. (Continued) • NAME 'ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1 . Applicant Certification I, .301-4-1--) ` -- v7 SaP.j , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: 0 City of Renton Technical Services Records 0 Title Company Records i 7ja'- King •unty Assessors Records 4 - r . ,Siang lar---. Date Z/,3 / 7 ��,'-\OLB (Applicant) m° ^1 woaif- 0 ��`��-'-6`o1 •:o'�O�a NOTARY `moo o� 6T TfQ: A. bs,,ribed an sworn before me, a of ' Public, in, for he State of Washin ton, . residing at: ;_/'/� on the day of g • F UB LlG u'�•`�y Sign�� • � .s S,i:�C.�`®'" (Notary Public) `1 c s o to U e:::;<:<>:»::::;::>::>:::�>:*::::»::>::::»>:>::>:::::;:>:<:»::>::<>:<>:>;>:<:::>:::::>:<:»::;::>:<:>:<:::>::>::>:::<:::>::: :i:i:i:CERTIFICATI F:MAILIN 0 0 NG::<':'`i <`<at>:i:'i<itiEgi<ii>`.iigg:`:€>g_�':�Na'>::`>i `; ' . �� ereby certify that notices of the•propoSetV application ere ma ed to each:lister>`.spro:>:: y{ wner ti :• `::; >.:.•ii.:`s'>i ::: :>:s<> > r :zr :g.:::$ ::$i ig3i.i > ''><> s:«:s>:i::'`: : : ' :gi.:i> ` td e a o ::::i:::::r :::%::ii::: ?::>:i::i:::ii'::::::::: :i::i::::<<%< :::::':�`::�>::i:i: ::i:::::`:::::'.g%':i. ::::>::: :::::?: :::;:%:: :::;::::<'r:i::�::> ATTEST::;::Sub ibed:;and::sworn;.before:.me::a::No . .:;Public;::: ::: for.:the:State;t i ashin• tort <'i: : re :sidin .at:<:>:::;:;..; : ;>.;?J/ ; ::;:<::::::>:>::::;.::::.::: on:.the.: da of:.::.;:.,.. : : : : ::: :,•>:.::>:>:< i c . : "::;;;:::<:<::»:::::::::: listprop.doc 6//9 91 REV 07/95 2 1 '- - - - -'rrrrW'r-+-- 1.7. T.0 C YT TT TT Y.W. 4"7,14fiV.T• *° BATCH NUMBER: HD ._COMMENTS a- * - CUSTOMER NAME BUSH•ROLu .HITCHIN 11,,. t *° u• ****Vtit *-1-ft** rntftAt**Itnit** **, *****t t*hoe******h**.! ************fetir **, rtr,t44 411* 000580-0001-07. 000580-0001-07 THE . BOEING COMPANY: 530653 THE BOEING COMPANY 530653 PO BOX 3707 M/S 1F-09 • . PO BOX 3707 M/S 1F-09 SEATTLE WA 98124 SEATTLE WA 98124 192305-9013-03 192305-9013-03 STONEHENGE II LIMITED 229800 STONEHENGE II LIMITED 229800 PARTNERSHIP . PARTNERSHIP 3605 132ND AVE `SE SUITE 300 . 3605 132N0 AVE SE SUITE 300 BELLEVUE WA ' 98006 . BELLEVUE WA 98006 1923057.9076-07 • 192305-9076-07 SOUTHGATE OFFICE PLAZA I . 913335 ' SOUTHGATE OFFICE PLAZA I - 913335 LIMITED PRTNRSHP LIMITED PRTNRSHP 3605 132ND . AVE SE :0300 - 3605 132ND AVE SE 0300 SEATTLE WA 98006 SEATTLE WA 98006 192305-9095-04 : 192305-9095-04. -STONEHENGE III LIMITED - 229800 . . 1 STONEHENGE .. III LIMITED 229800 PARTNERSHIP.. PARTNERSHIP 3605 132ND AVE SE:.SUITE : 300 3605 132ND AVE SE SUITE .300 BELLEVUE WA . 98006 BELLEVUE WA - 98006 ' 242304-9020-08 • ' - 242304-9020-08 WINMAR-:.CO.. INC. 2N0425 . -. WINMAR CO: INC 2N0425 PO: BOX 21545 .. . : . •PO' BOX . 21545- . . • . . SEATTLE' WA '98111' • SEATTLE WA 98111 242304-9022-06 . . 242304-9022-06 THE .BOEING 'COMPANY 530653 ' THE BOEING COMPANY : 530653 • PO BOX 3707M/S.- IF-09 PO " BOX 3707 M/S IF-09 SEATTLE : WA 98124 SEATTLE WA 98124 • • 242304-9115-04 : ; 242304-9115-04 * WINMAR . CO INC 2N0425 WINMAR CO INC 2N0425 "- PO' BOX : 21545 + PO : BOX 21545 SEATTLE . WA • 98111 SEATTLE WA 98111 252304-9019-00: ; 252304-9019-00 CITY : OF . RENTON- 209800. CITY . OF RENTON 209800 CITY HALL CITY HALL 200 MILL AVE SOUTH 200 MILL AVE SOUTH . RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA - 98055 . 252304-9037-08 • 252304-9037-08 CITY OF SEATTLE . 647777 CITY OF SEATTLE 647777 WATER DEPT WATER DEPT COUNTY'`CITY; BLDG COUNTY CITY. BLDG 252304-9058-02 252304-9058-02 KOCH .HANS GEORGE . 190139 KOCH HANS GEORGE ' . 190139 ' X.AALLPAK. CONTAINER X ALLPAK CONTAINER 1100• SW '27TH ' ST 1100 SW 27TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 252304'-9064-04 252304-9064-0, RENTON 01 L L C $59999 RENTON nl L C i.- 5601 SIXTH AVENUE SOUTH 5601 . SIXTH AVENUE SOUTH 559999 SEATTLE WA 98108 SEATTLE WA • 98108 302305-9007-06 302305-9007-06 CITY OF RENTON • 379700 CITY OF RENTON '�:�200 MILL AVE SOUTH 200 MILL AVE SOUTH 379700 - RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA • 98055 302305-9066-04 302305-9066-04 CITY OF SEATTLE 617777 CITY OF SEATTLE 617777 • 302305-9084-02 302305-9084-02 • OLYMPIC PIPE LINE COMPANY. 5N0674 OLYMPIC PIPE -LINE COMPANY 5N0674 ALEVY. KENNETH .R ALEVY:KENNETH R PO. BOX . 5568 PO BOX 5568 ` DENVER CO 80217 DENVER CO 80217 • 334040-4000-07 334040-4000-07 RENTON DELAWARE INC. 190072 .� -: C/O• GSIC: REALTY. CORP RENTON OELAWARE INC 190072 255 SHORELINE DR STE 600 C/O• GSIC REALTY. CORP 255 SHORELINE DR STE 600 REOWOOD: CITY. CA • 9.4065 REDWOOD CITY;CA • 94065 334040-5300�01 . • :'. :_..... ....... .._...__ ._. ,: .. . _ - 334040-5300-01 _ ;`j GROUP_:HEALTH • 000P/PUGET. SND261233 •521•.WALL: ST . GROUP HEALTH COOP/PUGE7 SND261233 SEATTLE • WA 521 WALL . ST 98121 SEATTLE WA . 98121 • • • • . - eF • [..{. :i ... , i , _. L'e'i2=4..F,....„i�.:'4R4.a.:Jt:•: ;,- -„.:,r::v5,,.:�yy$.;•••;A!...i r_.. • '• - ;`42;6ioiogsfff4),.. ."i- `Q.ri;1-0,441/�SYSSf.: . yt�>Y4 :<.':I .h. l '1 ':e , . t�.w•1� 'iG'G';? :1._'i•7 .�v, Re , .• 'Tia � ht • NOTICE OF r-rrOPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Approval (SA), Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SM) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II/LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to develop the site for warehouse, office and manufacturing uses. The proposed structure would be 99,635 Square Feet in size. Parking for 128 cars and dock high service for 20 trucks would also be provided. Development would maintain a 50 foot setback from Springbrook Creek and a 25 foot buffer from the Class III wetland on site. GENERAL LOCATION: 2000 Raymond Avenue South PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit Shoreline Substantial Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. ------ - --- — C.D NLLMGAI :• II EARINGTCN GAM � •' V 1[ S VALLEY OFFICE • a I I `�`, �=+ PARK —N— .y I�- I _ ca. O� I ICOMPA NY I r STONENENGE I I--�� !!!VA � � II LTD. C . O I / f01o___.. 9 I , , I w.00� OO~ /I I SOUTMGATE I«•I�..,,Q,.,,yt I I I OFFK �a.u�n�nrr AE°LEA i G GLMMK u co - -G— I■ OLYMPIC PIPE LINE r I I GLYNEK PIPE COMP NY LINE CO. I t-' • art Of FONTON I -- ------ - -- - - -- - -- - - -— `. 1.f_ .�i :1=" li GENMALOT.DOC • PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II/LUA-06-015,SA,SM,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to develop the site for warehouse,office and manufacturing uses.The proposed structure would be 99,635 Square Feet in size. Parking for 128 cars and dock high service for 20 trucks would also be provided. Development would maintain a 50 loot setback from Springbrook Creek and a 25 foot buffer from the Class fit wetland on site. GENERAL LOCATION: 2000 Raymond Avenue South PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit -Preliminary Plat _Short Plat • _Conditional Use Permit _Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review -Shoreline Conditional Use -Other Peril Fill&Grade Permit XXXX Shoreline Substantial -Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any lime prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative silo plan approval.Comments for Substantial Shoreline Perils must be received within thirty(30)days from the last dale of applicant's'Notice of Application'publication in the Valley Daily News. For further Information on Ike application,or II you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental • determinations,appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s)for this project,please contact the Development ' Services Division at 235-2550. , r fir, • • • • • • CERTIFICATION ,SCUIddA via L Q I'1 , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were osted y me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on Fto b. z�. ��G • Signed: SCLlabi, J1 JV• MY STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that �� J,g c,K. 4. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary,a;t'.for•the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. o;' e'er c•o �r Z.: , nor Dated: Notary •lic in a ifor the State of Vass ifir g Nota Print) l'Y14-�P -/e• twutkof My appointment expires: iVq1'ce, NOTARY.DOC PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: RAYMOND AVENUE CENTER II/LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to develop the site for warehouse, office and manufacturing uses. The proposed structure would be 99,635 Square Feet in size. Parking for 128 cars and dock high service for 20 trucks would also be provided. Development would maintain a 50 foot setback from Springbrook Creek and a 25 foot buffer from the Class III wetland on site. GENERAL LOCATION: 2000 Raymond Avenue South PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat Conditional Use Permit Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use Other Permit Fill&Grade Permit XXXX Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's"Notice of Application"publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. �\ ?ANIIGT I\ u \ N%-�VALLEY DrICE _M_,I � I II I y 1I .a i nCf INC. `I�CAIPANYLiI�fE:E j Ya0 1 Fill GATF /f I CFfFE PLAZA �•�rMW • I °«MF4 cant rir m CO OLYMPIC"PIPE LINE I OLYMPIC Gv C,PrY eta -� CITY iF RENTON sal Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • • February 28, 1998 Mr. Mark Miller Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. 10801 Main Street, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: -Raymond Avenue Center II Project No. LUA-96-015,SA,SM,ECF Dear Mr. Miller. The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has formally accepted the above-referenced application for review. • It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on March 19, 1996. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application for environmental review. Please contact me, at 277-6186, if you have any questions. Sincerely, • (1: • ennifer Toth Henning Project Manager - ti! • ACCPTLRDOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 [Z7 T.ie nnnnr nnntnine Fflo.rnnunlml mnt n& 9S%nncr nn..e ,..er .- . Mark Miller CONSULTANTS INC. DEVELOPMENT ■ LAND USE • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT February 20, 1996 RECEIVED FEB 21 1996 Jennifer Toth-Henning DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Public Work Department CITY OFRENTON City of Renton 200 Mill Ave . S . Renton, WA 98055 RE: Raymond Center - Opus Northwest LLC Dear Jennifer: As a follow up to the site plan approval for the Raymond Center application submitted on February 15, 1996, I am also enclosing the following requested information: Memorandum from Opus Northwest LLC regarding construction mitigation description as per your site plan approval outline item number 8 . If you have any questions on this information, please do not hesitate to call . Very truly yours, MARK MILLER CONSULTANTS, INC. Mark Miller MM:pp Enclosure cc : Bart Brynestad (w/ encls . ) 10801 Main Street, Suite 100 • Bellevue,Washington 98004 • 206/455-1724 • FAX 206/455-5076 hob-th-yti I K1 14;b4 uru NUKI11Vt.a1 LLU riA NU. 1cu04031 iic r. uciuc Ai, opus Opus Northwest LLC 200 112th Avenue NE Phone: (206) 453-4100 Suite 205 Fax: (206) 453-1712 Bellevue, Washington 98004 MEMORANDUM TO: Whom it may concern FROM: Bart Brynestad DATE: February 16, 1996 RE: 10 Acre Renton Site 8. Construction Mltiget(on Pe r(ptipn • Proposed Construction Dates It is proposed that construction will start in May 1996 and construction will be complete by December 1996. • Hours of Operation The hours of operation during construction will be 7:00am to 5:00pm, Monday through Friday. • Proposed Hauling/Transportation Routes Any hauling and transportation routes will be approved by the City of Renton. It is proposed that the routes will be from 1-405 or Highway 167 to SW 16th Street to Raymond Avenue to the site. • Measures to be implemented to minimize dust traffic and transportation impacts, mud, noise and other noxious characteristics. Dust debatement methods will be used at the site as well as street cleaning. All local and federal requirements regarding noxious characteristics will be complied with. 02/16/96 FRI 14:48 [TX/RX NO 5012] e002 Mark Miller CONSULTANTS INC. DEVELOPMENT ■ LAND USE ■ CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON February 16, 1996 FEB 2 0 1996 RECEIVED Jennifer Toth-Henning Public Works Department City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. S . Renton, WA 98055 RE: Raymond Center/Opus Northwest LLC Dear Jennifer: As a follow up to the site plan approval for Raymond Center submitted for Opus Northwest LLC on February 15, 1996, I am enclosing as requested the following items : A. Three copies of October, 1992 wetland delineation by Shannon & Wilson, Inc . ; B. Three copies of April 14, 1995 geotechnical report by Earth Consultants, Inc . Very truly yours, MARK MILLER CONSULTANTS, INC. Mark Miller MM:pp Enclosures cc : Bart Brynestad 10801 Main Street, Suite 100 ■ Bellevue,Washington 98004 ■ 206/455-1724 ■ FAX 206/455-5076 ..............................:.:.:::.<.....:.......:......:.......................:. :..:..:::bEUEL'OPIVI ENT:S.ER�I:CES:.D.I. .1.SION........................ . /.IA TER AP . LICATIO ...... C . ...�:::::::.::::::.:::::::.:::. .:.::.:::::.�..::::: .................... ..1.... O�iMATI .N... con ........ ....... ..........:.::....... ::....:,::..::.::.:..:..:...::.::::::.:..::....:..::::::,::..:. Note >[f<the:re<.s ore tF an onefe aI ow er le notarized Master:€Applcation,for.each.owner .,.... ....... ......... EXISTING LAND USE(S): Vacant Lana. Owner _ Developer NAME: Winmar-Metro,_ Inc . Opus Northwest LLC ADDRESS: 700 5th Ave-.., #2600 200 112th Ave ROPOSED LAND USES: Office/Warehouse/Manu— N.E. , #205 facturing CITY: Seattle, WA ZIP: Bellevue,: WP_ 98104 98004 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 223-6292 (206) 453-410C PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: NAME: Mark Miller Mark Miller Consultants , Inc . EXISTING ZONING: IL ADDRESS: 10801 Main Street, Suite 100 PROPOSED ZONING: IL CITY: Bellevue, WA ZIP: 98004 SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): 452 , 716 s . f. TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 455--1724 PROJECT VALUE: 1 500 00 0 . 0'0 »<; ........................ PROJECT.OR.DEVELOPMENT NAME: • • • '?'.°-_Raymond.,..Avenue Center ' IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? No. I?ROPERTY/PRO eCT ApDDRESS(S)/LOCATION: 901 Ra 'mbid'' Avenue S .W. IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? Springbrook Creek KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): RIVED • 242304-9020-08 8 � � ?996 Dt_yELOPmPNT`-ry of Rery OONING N .i, r - I :::!1:ii::<:::>::>::>::::i iii ::::i:mi::; . >: t` ,igl .i: sheet:)f>::ne.cess .......................................: :>::::>: ::>:<:::>:::;::»>:::> ::::<::>::�EGAL::DE.S.CRI ,.. )N::.OF..:P.ROPEF3IY.. At�ach.:ae. :a_. :..........................::::.:...::::::::.::Y1.::::::..:............................ •, . Please see attached documents for legal description. 1 • ,I :> :>::«: ::» :>:> « «: heck<a[Ia .Ircation:t thata .L it sf ffw( I>determi ne:fees :«<> < :> :> > :: : : ::: :::. ::: :: ::: . : ;: . .. :: .. ...:.: .::.. : ..: ._:::::::.:::..::::.:::.::....:..............:::.:...:..:.:::.:: ...:............::.:.......:...::. i _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: ' _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE 1 $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _,SHORT PLAT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ —TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _'PRELIMINARY PLAT $ X SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ 5 0 0 .0 0 _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY ! _WAIVER $ _ FINAL I _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION _ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ 'I BINDING SITE PLAN $ . 1 j SHORELINE REVIEWS: ' •X SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $1 ,000 .00 _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ , _ EXEMPTION $No Charge 'ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW., $ 500 . 0Q REVISION $ OVV)NERSHIP>< > >> <» :'g:4! >NEME > >' > >M::: «><>> LiDraik I, (Print Name)/_J J/D(Z)k6p-"l , declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,,the authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ' 4,000,V114,41 ATTEST: Subscribedand sworn to before rr}�+ , , �1�'�$ard Eddie L. Hehdri kson, President for the State of residing at �,` IoN e.,42�L'f SI (Name of Owner/Representative) 19 , on the J� TARy�. �'�$ ci% RIBS =s (Signature of Owner/Representative) ♦ lw _4a ',`O.1., (Signature of Notary Public) b, 0F• !•. '•`'`.�� :;:.::::::::>::>:::::::::;::::;::::>::»::>::»:.::;<;::>::.>:<::<:::::>:::<:.;;.»::>::>:<:.:>::;:.::<:>:..: f ..h(s..se. t. .. . c. m. .lete:d':b:...C..t ..S:o......)............................................ ......:....:..............:..:..::::::.::... :::...:.........:. .... ::.. ... .:.g .;.:::::::::..:.:..Cr. A.:.,.F3::.:..SH.PL.t:C.U.sLLA:.::::PP.�:::.F,.p.:.:."FP:::::5P,.:::::RV[VIP::>::>:::V::»>::>;:;;.;;:.;:.;:.;:.;;:.iii ;;: REVISED 2/95 BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2 OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER LUA-95-064-LLA, AS RECORDED UNDER K.C.R.N. 9508039005. >.....D. VELOP. E;<>: MEN:::>SE' V:.;:::::.;:.: :.; :: :::.;::: <» > < <«< «`< > >><>< ><>> '< _;> ::.:::.::.::.::.::.::::.::::.:::.:.::.::.:......>:....:::.::.:,. ...................... .. T.. . R. fCES..QIVI.SI.ON............... :: : : :. :. ...... ..ENT` LCHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: • • The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of,Jhis.checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. RPCRIVED FEB I 5 1996 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON • i Environmental Checklist , A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: RAYMOND STREET CENTER '! 2. Name of applicant: Opus Northwest LLC ATTN: Bart Brynestad 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: \ Architect: Bob Fadden Opus Northwest LLC Mark Person: Lance Mueller & Associates Mark Miller (455-1724) 200-112th Ave. N.E. , Su_ it e 205 1080.1.-N�ain St., Suite 100 130 Lakeside, Suite 250 Bellevue, WA 98004 Bellevue, WA 98004 Seattle,.,WA 98122 4. Dale checklist prepared: 325-2553 February 14 , 1996 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Receive site plan approval Receive Shoreline permit Receive Grading permit 7. BnRt Wave any plansngr Fu ure additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Soils report Wetland review 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Shoreline permit Building permit Grading permit Utility permits '! Street use permits Department of Fisheries approval 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. See Exhibit "A" • 2 i ; .I S S EXHIBIT "A" RAYMOND STREET CENTER Raymond Street Center is a commercial project designed for warehouse, office and manufacturing use as permitted in the IL zone in Renton. The building will be constructed for those uses, permitted in the F1, Si and B or other acceptable occupancy groups of the Uniform Building Code . The facility is planned to be available for occupant use in late 1996 . The facility will be constructed as a type III-N fully sprinklered building. The roof structure will be a hybrid wood steel Berkley. system with a class "B" built up roof membrane. The exterior walls will be painted concrete with reveals serving as architectural articulation. Office areas will feature insulated architectural glazing with a corporate entry feature. A secondary office entry area will be provided at the south end of the facility. This will allow the facility to accommodate a variety of users . The building floor will be designed for 250 lb. /s . f . loading and be concrete slab on grade. Future office areas may be located on mezzanine areas . These floors may be of plywood and wood truss construction or traditional metal system of concrete on a metal deck or bar joists . The site is located at the end of Raymond Street and is located between Springbrook Creek drainage channel on the south and west and a class III wetland area along its eastern boundary. The north boundary of the site has a drainage ditch that flows along its border to Springbrook ditch. The site is served with water and sanitary sewer at the northeast corner where Raymond Street abuts the lot . The approximate area of the site Parcel B is 452 , 716 s . f . The site was previously filled under an earlier permit to elevations shown on survey. The survey also indicates the edge of the delineated wetland along the east boundary. The bank of the drainage channel on the west and south is bermed above the elevation of the fill . The existing site is covered with grass, Scotch Broom and scrub Alder at wetland. Ditch areas have some brush cover. The site plan has been designed to meet the needs of current tenant demands in the south Renton area. The plan has been developed to accommodate the building and parking requirements based on highpiled warehousing and manufacturing. The building area of approximately 99, 635 s . f . is in the minimum range of area required by most current users . 1 EXHIBIT "A" RAYMOND STREET CENTER Page Two The layout of the site is a direct result of user needs, site constraints and setback requirements . In order to develop sufficient building area and dock high services, the main loading and activity areas were located on the western and southern faces of the building. The main office area will be located at the north end of the building. The main employee parking area will be placed between the water quality area at the far north and the building. All paving, parking, drives and service areas will be placed with a 50' setback from ordinary high water of the drainage channel and 25' away from the class III wetland. The site will have a low lot coverage of 19% with vehicle parking for 128 cars. The building will provide dock high service for 20 trucks and drive in service areas in at least two places . The site plan, as designed, provides for separation of parking and service activities . It also has good maneuvering and circulation of large vehicles along with adequate areas for large vehicle parking with opportunity for limited outside storage. The site Parcel B, at this time, will be fully developed. All areas outside of wetland and stream buffers will be landscaped, paved and developed into water quality areas or building. If any recontouring in buffer areas is necessary, those areas will be restored, otherwise they will be left as native buffers . \mark\raymdstl.exh 2 4111 Environmental Checklist 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. See civil drawings sheet C-1, 3 and attached neighborhood maps . B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one)O oiling,-hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other • b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Less than 1% in all areas of development. c. -- What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand,.gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Silty sand, peat and silt. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None e. - Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Volume out = 3 ,950 c .y. ; Volume fill:.= 5 ,660 c.y. • Source of fill as approved by soils engineer. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion could occur during various construction activities due to grading and trenching. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Total area = 10 .39 ac. , .. disturbed area = 4 . 97 ac. , impervious surface area = 4 .70 ac. Percent impervious = 45 .2% . 3 M 411, Environmental Checklist ' I h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Pro'vide city approved temporary erosion control plan until final improvements are installed. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If .any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust, equipment and vehicle emission during construction. Vehicle emissions after completion and emission from gas heating equipment. b. Are there any off--site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Comply to vehicle emission standards and dust abatement procedures . I 3. WATER a. Surface Water: . I 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater„lakes, ponds,-wetlands)? If yes; describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Spring Brook Creek (drainage channel) at the west. Existing class III wetland at the east and north. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Building and site improvements within 50 ' of ordinary high water — and within 25 ' of existing class III wetland at the east and north. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None 1 5) • Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. Site is currently filled above 100 year floodplain. 4 i I a ,• imo Environmental Checklist 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground Water: 1) :.Will.ground water be.withdrawn,.or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will.be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for,example: Domestic sewage;industrial,: containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size•ofthe system;'the of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe.the source of runoff. (including storm water) ..and.::method•.of.collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). -Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Runoff from impervious surfaces will be collected into an underground system and discharged into a city drainage ditch at the north edgel of the site. Some of the clean roof water will be discharged into 2) wDtl nd at east to ma maintain or existinga run off conditions. g waters? _If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Provide city approved water quality and detetio system prior to discharge into city drain. Pay ci n ty mitigation fees per Ordinance . 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on • - site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain X • wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grass and Scotchbroom will be removed in previously filled area which will be developed. 5 410 111 Environmental Checklist c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscaping will be installed per city ordinance and Green River ordinance. This landscaping will enhance habitat value of the site. 5. ANIMALS a. :Circle any birds:and animals which have been observed.on:or.near the site or-are known to be on or near the site: (see next page) Birds: hawk, heron, eagle6ongbirds, they Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon,trout, herring, shelifis i, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If sol, explain Pacific Flyway d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Install new landscaping. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energ CID natural ga, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed proje - ergy nee•s Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be used for lighting, cooling, convenience outlets and to run equipment. Gas will be used for heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No 1 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Conform to State Energy Code. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 6 111 Environmental Checklist a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire, police and aid car. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? • None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction equipment noise and vehicle noise during construction. Vehicle noise after completion. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Comply with vehicle noise standards and noise abatement regulations . 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Undeveloped land. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. . None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? IL f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Industrial 7 • 1110 11111. ' Environmental Checklist g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Class III wetland at east and north lot lines. I � i. -Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 35 to 50 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing:.and.:projected land uses and plans, if any: ' Comply with zoning standards . 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would. be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. DNA, b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. DNA c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: DNA • 10. AESTHETIC'S a. 'What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 35 '; height above finish floor . Principal exterior material is painted concrete. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? II None . c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:. Install landscaping. II, 8 • F 410 Environmental Checklist 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Night lighting of site will be installed. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, 'f any: Use Photometrics to control lighting affects. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate Vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses?- If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts.on.recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Provide basketball area, seating area at channel and picnic area. . . . . 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. • Raymond Street • , i 4114 Environmental Checklist b. Is site currently served by public transit?1 If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? One1mile to any bus stop. jl c. How jmany parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Approximately 128 new stalls. No existing stalls . d. -Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,-or,improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so,'generally describe :(indicate whether-public or private? No . :I I e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate ..vicinity:of) water,-grail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe; No f. How.many vehicular trips per day would'be,generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 4 . 88 trip per 1 ,000 s .f. or 486 .2 trips per day based on ITF manual . � g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Participate in Renton Traffic Mitigation Program. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES • a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care,,schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Fire , police and aid car. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Paycitymitigation fees per Ordinance . g 16. UTILITIES a. Circle util' '- rren . ailable at the site - 11211.a refuse II service telephone sanitary sewe septic system, : - . 10 Ji Environmental Checklist b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity — Puget Power Telephone — U.S . West Other utilities from City of Renton C. SIGNATURE I, .the.undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge-the above information is.true and complete. It :is understood that the lead agency may;withdraw any-declaration of non- • significance that it might.issue in reliance upon this•checklist .should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: MARK MILLER ONSULTANTS, INC. • • 4110141. Name Printed: MARK MILLER Date: Fes' . is if 9 4 • 11 0 f 0 .: 1 I. Environmental Checklist I D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS r i • ;,:::s::ee s`€>s::'ould> ';<;:I:`: b.� >��:`ed>fo�ri>acfio'��`�€ nvolvin'��>deciso�ns>`on>�? of c s . en . (Tt. se.:::.miii:i...t .:.v::igii Qn.Y,::::.: .,*i:$::::::::::.: .::.::..::.: ::.: . :.::.:.g:::: :.:: .::::::: :::.::::.:.P.. .:. ..,.::p:.. :.: .n..: :..;.`:::u c1' `::`o`'''ee_ _.;. Pout f es s e s f ro ct n programs :Yo. .; o.n. t.n ,to.:fl:. : ..h. . b. �. . .......P . .:: . . ) ::.......:..: ::::: : :.:::::::::::::. . i Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. .When answering these questions, be aware of the extent.the proposal, or the types of activities . likely.to.result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate • than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly.and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to .water;:emissions to air;.production, I . storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production-of noise? ,' . Proposed measures to avoid,or reduce/such increases are: . 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish,-or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals,-fish, or marine life are: P I 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? i I i, li Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use for affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? I . Proposed measures to protect such'resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? i Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: I • 12 41) Environmental Checklist 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw:any.-.declaration of non- significance that it•might issue in reliance •upon this checklist should there .be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Date: REVISED 9/94 • 13 111 Mark Miller CONSULTANTS INC. DEVELOPMENT ■ LAND USE • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT February 15, 1996 0i City of Renton Development Services Division Municipal Building DEB, 1 1996 200 Mill Ave . S . Renton, WA 98055 �EVELopive�taP��No oF RE: Raymond Center Dear City of Renton: On behalf of Opus Northwest LLC I am applying for a site plan approval, shoreline substantial development permit and environmental review for the Raymond Center property. This property previously received the above listed approvals approximately May 3 , 1995 under Project No. LUA-95 . 064, SA, SM, ECF, LLA for a 81, 250 square foot building. This application is for a 99, 635 square foot building. The previous application received a wetland variance approval on November 6, 1995 (No. LUA 95 . 064, SA, SM, ECF, LCA, Category 3) . The previously approved wetlands variance has been incorporated into the plans of this application. Also, as it relates to this property, the city suggested on September 25, 1995 that a letter of map revision with FEMA be obtained, but that the FEMA approval is not part of site plan approval conditions . Opus Northwest LLC is currently working on obtaining a letter of map revision in conjunction with a future building permit application for this property. As part of this application I am enclosing the following: A. 11 copies of Master Application; B. 11 copies of signed Environmental Checklist, including project narrative; C. One full set of mailing labels; E. Two copies of notarized list; F. One check for $2, 000 . 00; G. 11 copies of architectural Al, A2, landscaping L1 . 1, L1 .2 and civil 1 of 1; H. 11 copies of neighborhood plan; 10801 Main Street, Suite 100 • Bellevue,Washington 98004 • 206/455-1724 • FAX 206/455-5076 S City of Renton February 15, 1996 Page Two I . One set of reduced architectural; • J. Two sets of reduced neighborhood plan; K. One copy of 4"x 6" reduction drawing; L. One set colored architectural landscaping and neighborhood plans; M. 11 copies of storm drainage report . If you have any questions regarding this application, please contact : Mark Miller Mark Miller Consultants, Inc . 10801 Main St . , Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455-1724 Thank you for your attention in processing our requests . Very truly yours, MARK MILLER CONSULTANTS, INC. Mark Miller MM:pp Enclosures cc : Opus Northwest LLC M e il K C'1 .I 1 .' ; 1'+--'.,, i,;"'�.L �.,�-a..R qy �r ,-�'^e'.1 U 10801 Main Street, Suite 100 • Bellevue,Washington 98004 • 206/455-1724 • FAX 206/455-5076 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 02/15/96 14 :36 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9600662 Amount : 2, 010 .24 02/15/96 14 :35 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #2810 M MILLER Init : LN Project # : LUA96-015 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 242304-9020 Site Address : 2000 RAYMOND AV SW Total Fees : 2, 010 .24 This Payment 2, 010 .24 Total ALL Pmts : 2, 010 .24 Balance : . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 500 . 00 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 10 . 24 . . . T 1412-01 1;5 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING - • 1`t CITY OF RFNTON FEB 2 01996 :• .. . �4 t..T • a CE M - j . ' 4 d I i; ;: Preliminary Wetland Delineation Van Woerden Tract .�_ • . x t'; . Southwest of Raymond Ave. S.W. Renton, Washington =1 :t'i 1; • October 1992 `� . Mr. Tim Puryear :. Winmar Company, inc. •``y :T rr. • • L'a is . 700 - 5th Avenue - 0 Gateway Tower •,t Seattle, WA 98104-5026 I'1 a r k Y . i i-..: . . - ,. „, 4 _ 'VA4 .: fp . • ti.36er S.": SHANNON 6WILSON, INC. _ ,1m ' - GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 400 N. 34th St. ® Suite .100 , . P.O. Box 300303 k' Seattle, Washington 98103 • . - ',a. . • 206�632 ®8020 :°• . - f.-... rF 1 • i' �..I��NI SEATTLE EVERETT KEW GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTALts • I��S INC ENE SK ANCHORAGE • SAINT LOUIS October 27, 1992 Mr. Tim Puryear • Winmar Company, Inc. • 700 - 5th Avenue ,Gateway Tower ,Seattle, Washington '98104-5026 'RE: PRELIMINARY WETLAND DELINEATION VAN WOERDEN TRACT SOUTHWEST OF RAYMOND AVENUE SOUTHWEST RENTON, WASHINGTON A preliminary wetland delineation was requested by Mr. Tim Puryear from Winmar Company, Inc. • for the Van Woerden Tract property located southwest of Raymond Avenue Southwest in Renton, Washington. Shannon &Wilson, Inc. prepared this preliminary wetland delineation in accordance • with our proposal dated September 1, 1992. The scope of services was authorized by Mr. Dean Henery on October 8, 1992. The objective of this preliminary wetland delineation is to identify and flag wetland boundaries on the subject property using the Federal Manual for Identifying and • Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands (January, 1989). Sincerely, SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Theresa R. Henson Wetland Specialist • Irank W. Pita, P.E. P.G. Vice President TRH:FWP/trh T1412-01.RPT/r1412-1kd/dgw T-1412-01 • 400 NORTH 34TH STREET•SUITE 100 P.O.BOX 300303 SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98103 206.632.8020 FAX 206.633.6777 • SHANNON&WILSON.INC. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The findings and conclusions presented in this study are based on an interpretation of information currently available to Shannon &Wilson, Inc. This summary is for introductory purposes and should only be used with the full text of this report. Based upon information derived through site reconnaissance and readily available documents, three wetland areas were delineated on the subject property. The wetland delineation was based upon the Routine On-Site Determination Method described in the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands (January, 1989). Wetland "A" is a palustrine forested (willow),palustrine shrub-scrub(willow),palustrine emergent(yellow iris/cattail)wetland located along the eastern property boundary. The on-site portion of Wetland "A" is approximately 1.35 acre(58,742 square feet(ft2))in size. Wetland "B" is a palustrine scrub-shrub (alder),palustrine emergent (reed canarygrass/cattail) wetland located in the southwest quarter of the site. The on-site portion of Wetland "B" is approximately 4.21 acre (183,184 ft2) in size. Wetland "C" [f is a palustrine scrub-shrub (willow), palustrine emergent (sedge) wetland located along the _ northeastern property boundary. The on-site portion of Wetland "C" is approximately 0.03 acre f; (1,329 ft2) in size. " Using the City of Renton Wetland Management Ordinance No. 4346 (March 1992) Wetlands "A", "B", and "C" would be classified as Category 3, Lower Quality Wetlands. .These wetlands have been severely disturbed by human-related hydrologic alterations including diking, ditching, channelization and outlet modification, and have had soils alterations including the presence of fill, soil removal and soil compaction. The ordinance requires 25 foot native vegetation buffers around the wetlands, since the site would have an urban Shoreline Master Program designation. A 20 foot building setback from the wetland buffer edge may also be required by the City of Renton Building Regulations. Springbrook Creek flows in a northerly direction through the center of the site. Springbrook Creek would require at least a 50 foot native vegetation buffer between the creek and any • development, since the site would have an urban Shoreline Master Program designation. A Modified Reppert Values Evaluation (MRVE) was completed for each of the three wetland areas. Based on an interpretation of the MRVE, Wetlands "A" and "B" have generally high to moderate functions and values, and Wetland "C" has generally moderate functions and values. T-1412-01 i SHANNON&WILSON.INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i • 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Scope of Services 1 1.2 Site Location and Description 2 2.0 DOCUMENT RESEARCH 3 • 2.1 Historical Aerial Photographs 3 2.2 Wetland Inventory Maps 5 2.2.1 City of Renton Wetland, Lakes, Rivers and Streams Maps 5 2.2.2 U.S. Fish and wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map 5 • 2.3 Washington State Natural Heritage System Database Review 5 2.3.1 Washington State Department of Wildlife Nongame Database Review . 5 2.3.2 Washington State Department of Natural Resources Database Review . 5 2.4 Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey of the King County Area 6 2.5 Springbrook Creek Stream Flow Data 7 • ` 3.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 7 3.1 Site Conditions During Site Visit 7 3.2 Topography 7 3.3 Fauna 8 3.4 Vegetation 8 3.5 Soils 8 • 3.6 Hydrology 9 4.0 WETLAND AREAS 9 • 4.1 Wetland "A" 10 4.2 Wetland "B" 10 ' 4.3 Wetland "C" 11 T-1412-01 ii SHANNON&WILSON,INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) Page 5.0 WETLAND FUNCTIONS AND VALUES - 11 5.1 Wetland "A" 12 5.2 Wetland "B" 12 5.3 Wetland "C" 12 6.0 WETLAND REGULATION 12 7.0 CONCLUSIONS 13 8.0 CLOSURE 14 9.0 LIST OF REFERENCES 16 LIST OF TABLES Table. No. 1 Identified Wetland Vegetation Species 2 Identified Upland Vegetation Species 3 Hydric Soil Indicators 4 Results of Triple Parameter Approach for each Plot/Test Hole 5 Hydrologic Regimes and Wetland Characteristics • LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. 1 Vicinity Map 2 Wetland Site Plan 3 City of Renton Wetlands Map 4 National Wetland Inventory Map 5 Soil Conservation Service Map T-1412-01 iii ' • SHANNON FiWILSON,INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) LIST OF APPENDICES • APPENDIX A - WETLAND DELINEATION METHODOLOGY • • APPENDIX B - PHOTOGRAPHS • • APPENDIX C - DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE NONGAME DATABASE INFORMATION • APPENDIX D - DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DATABASE INFORMATION APPENDIX E - DEFINITION OF PLANT INDICATOR STATUS AND FIELD SHEETS APPENDIX F - MODIFIED REPPERT WETLAND VALUES EVALUATION SHEETS • • • • T-1412-01 • iv SHANNON 6WILSON,INC. PRELIMINARY WETLAND DELINEATION VAN WOERDEN TRACT RENTON, WASHINGTON 1.0 INTRODUCTION Shannon & Wilson, Inc. has completed a preliminary wetland delineation of the Van Woerden Tract property located southwest of Raymond Avenue in Renton, Washington (Figure 1). The scope of services was authorized by Dean Henery on October 8, 1992. This work was per- formed for Winmar Company, Inc. to assist in the acquisition of permits necessary to proceed with development of the subject site. _ 1.1 Scope of Services The scope of work for this study was limited to the following tasks: ► Review of local regulations pertaining to the wetland areas identified on or near the subject site.. The review will be used to identify the required buffers and to classify . . the on-site wetlands. ► Conduct a visual assessment to observe existing site conditions and identify and flag any wetlands located on the site. This will be accomplished using the Routine On-Site f' Determination Method, defined in the January 1989 Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands (Appendix A). ► A review of aerial photographs to help identify past disturbances and conditions of the site. • ► Review of readily available documents including: • - Local wetland inventory maps. • - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Maps. - The Soil Conservation Service soil survey of King County. • ► A review of the Washington Department of Natural Resources database for endangered, threatened, or sensitive plants or plant communities and animals and their breeding or nesting areas on and near the site. T-1412-01 1 SHANNON&WILSON,INC. ► Assessment of identified wetlands to help determine the overall functions and values • of the wetlands. ► Preparation of a report documenting the process, findings, conclusions, and any recom- mendations for this project. 1.2 Site Location and Description The subject property is located southwest of Raymond Avenue Southwest along Springbrook Creek in Renton, Washington (SE1/4 Sec. 24 T23N R4E) (Figure 1). The subject site is a . rectangular shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 28 acres. Springbrook Creek flows in a northerly direction through the center of the site. The site consists of six distinct areas, the northwest upland field, the southwest wetland, the eastern upland field, the northeast wetland ditch, the eastern wetland, and Springbrook Creek (Figure 2). Photographs of the subject property are included in Appendix B. Three wetlands were identified on the subject site. Wetland "A" ,is a palustrine forested (willow),palustrine shrub-scrub(willow),palustrine emergent(yellow iris)wetland located along the eastern property boundary. The on-site portion of Wetland "A" is approximately 1.35 acre (58,742 square feet (ft2) in size.. Wetland "B" is a palustrine scrub-shrub (alder), palustrine emergent (reed canarygrass/cattail).wetland located in the southwest quarter of the site. The on-site portion of Wetland "B" is approximately 4.21 acre (183,184 ft2) in size. Wetland "C" is a palustrine scrub-shrub (willow), palustrine emergent (sedge) wetland located along the northeastern property boundary. The on-site portion of Wetland "C" is approximately 0.03 acre (1,329 ft2) in size. The site is bounded on the north by undeveloped land and wetlands, on the south by a ware- house, undeveloped land and wetlands, on the east by wetlands and a cleared lot, and on the west by the Longacres Practice Track. . • • T-1412-01 2 SHANNON FiWILSON,INC. 2.0 DOCUMENT RESEARCH 2.1 Historical Aerial Photographs In the study of aerial photographs, observations are interpretive and limited to the subject site and adjacent areas. Aerial photographs for the years 1936, 1946, 1956, 1960, 1968, 1974, 1980, 1985, and 1990 were reviewed to evaluate past site conditions. 1936 Aerial Photograph Interpretation of the photograph taken in 1936 indicated that the subject property contained grassy fields, and a bridge was located over the northern on-site portion of Springbrook Creek. Springbrook Creek flowed in a northerly direction through the center of the site. A portion of an old meander scar from the Green River extended from the east central property boundary to Springbrook Creek. A small creek flowed north from the south central property boundary into Springbrook Creek. An east-west ditch had been excavated from the northeast corner of r` the site to Springbrook Creek. 1946 Aerial Photograph j, Interpretation of the photograph taken in 1946 indicated that the on-site fields had been recently plowed, and planted, and shrub vegetation was located on-site along the eastern property boundary. The meander scar was well defined and inundated. The small creek was shrub covered.. Standing water was located in the central portion of the eastern field. Culverts and fill material were placed at the eastern and western ends of the ditch located on the northeastern property boundary. 1956 Aerial Photograph • 1- Interpretation of the photograph taken in 1956 indicated that shrub vegetation that was located along the eastern property boundary had been cleared. Otherwise the site appeared relatively unchanged from the 1946 photo. 1960 Aerial Photograph Interpretation of the photograph taken in June of 1960 indicated that at the majority of vegetation that was located along the small creek had been cleared, and it was evident that the small stream T-1412-01 3 SHANNON&WILSON,INC. • did not have a well defined channel. The old meander scar had been recently dredge and the dredge materials had been side cast to form a low dike. The eastern field contained several east- west shallow ditches. Standing water was present over much of the southwestern field. • • 1968 Aerial Photograph Interpretation of the photograph taken in May of 1968 indicated that Springbrook Creek, the meander scar, and the small creek had been recently deepened and widened. The dredge materials had been side cast. The bridge crossing the northern on-site portion of Springbrook Creek had been removed. A portion of the southwest field, and the adjacent property east of the site had been cleared of vegetation. 1974 Aerial Photograph Interpretation of the photograph taken in March of 1974 indicated that the southwest field had been cleared, and a series of shallow east-west ditches had been constructed. A deep ditch northwest-southeast ditch had been constructed in the southwest corner of the site. A deep ditch had also been excavated along the southern property boundary. The northern portion of the small creek, adjacent to Springbrook creek had been filled and a culvert was placed in the fill. A tall berm had been constructed on the southern edge of the meander scar. A small "v" shaped break was observed in the western portion of the berm. Standing water was present in all of the ditches, in the southwest field, in Springbrook Creek, the meander scar, the small creek, • and in the eastern portion of the eastern field. 1980 Aerial Photograph Interpretation of the photograph taken in May of 1980 indicated that the eastern field had been filled. Standing water was evident in all of the on-site ditches, Springbrook Creek, the meander • scar, and the southwestern field. 1985 Aerial Photograph • Interpretation of the photograph taken in March of 1985 indicated that the western half of the site had been cleared of vegetation. Standing water was evident in the same locations described • in the 1980 aerial photograph. T-1412-01 4 • SHANNON&WILSON,INC. 1990 Aerial Photograph Interpretation of the photograph taken in July of 1990 indicated that the eastern field had been ' cleared and graded. 2.2 Wetland Inventory Maps 2.2.1 City of Renton Wetland, Lakes. Rivers and Streams Maps The City of Renton's Wetland, Lakes, Rivers and Streams Maps shows a portion of Wetland 9 (W-9) located on the eastern boundary of the subject property (Figure 3). Wetland 9 is listed in the City's Wetland Inventory Report as containing palustrine emergent, palustrine scrub-shrub, palustrine forested, and palustrine open water (permanently flooded) wetland classes. At the time of the site visit the wetland was entirely vegetated and an open water component was not observed in the wetland. 2.2.2 U.S, Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map The.U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National.Wetland Inventory Map (1973) for the area shows a palustrine emergent saturated/semipermanent/seasonally flooded wetland (PEMY) as being present in the steam beds and on the eastern boundary of the subject property (Figure 4). 2.3 Washington State Natural Heritage System Database Review 2.3.1 Washington State Department of Wildlife Nongame Database Review A review of the Washington State Department of Wildlife Nongame Da tabase p g has been requested to determine if there has been a recorded occurrence of special animal species on-site or within the immediate vicinity of the subject property. The data base review information has not been received at this time but will be forwarded upon receipt in our office. 2.3.2 Washington State Department of Natural Resources Database Review A review of the Washington State Department of Natural Resources Database determined that there are no significant natural features located on or within the immediate vicinity of the subject property (Appendix D). Significant natural features that would be listed include endangered, threatened, or sensitive plant species as well as high quality native plant communi- ties and wetlands. T-1412-01 5 SHANNON 6WILSON,INC. • 2.4 Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey of the King County Area • The U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Soil Survey of King County, Washington (1973) was consulted to determine the general nature of soils on the subject site. The following soils information was taken from this publication. Puyallup sandy loam (Py on the SCS map) and Woodinville silt loam (Wo on the SCS map)is mapped as being present on the subject property (Plate 5). The Puyallup series is made up of well drained soils that formed in alluvium under grass, hardwoods and conifers. These soils are typically located on natural levees adjacent to streams. The surface layer is typically a grayish-brown and dark grayish-brown fine sandy loam extends to a depth of about 34 inches. The substratum to a depth of about 60 inches, is a very dark grayish-brown, and dark-brown medium sand, loamy sand, and sand. Permeability of this soil is moderately rapid. Available water capacity is moderately high, surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight. the seasonal water table is typically at a depth of 4 to 5 feet. As i. part of the mapping of the Puyallup series, the SCS has included up to 15 percent Briscot, Newberg, Nooksack,,Oridia, and Renton soils; and up to 10% poorly drained Woodinville and Puget soils. The Puyallup series is not included on the hydric soil list for King County; nor are the Newberg and Nooksack soils included within the Puyallup map unit, however, the Briscot, Oridia, Renton, Woodinville and Puget soils included in the Puyallup map unit are list as hydric soils. The Woodinville series is made up of poorly drained soils that formed under grass and sedges, in alluvium, on steam bottoms. A representative profile of Woodinville soils includes gray silt loam, silty clay loam, and layers of peaty muck to a depth of about 38 inches. This is underlain by greenish-gray silt loam extending up to 60 inches or more in depth. Permeability of the Woodinville soil is moderately slow and the water table is usually at or near the surface. Available water capacity is high and surface runoff is slow. As part of the mapping of the r' Woodinville soil, the SCS has included up to 15 percent Puget soils, up to 10 percent Snohomish, Oridia, Briscot, Puyallup, Newberg and Nooksack soils. The Woodinville series is included on the hydric soil list for King County; as are the Snohomish, Oridia, and Briscot soils included in the Woodinville map unit. The Puyallup, Newburg and Nooksack soil included in the Woodinville map unit are not included on the hydric soils list. • T-1412-01 • 6 SHANNON&WILSON,INC. 2.5 Springbrook Creek Stream Flow Data Data gathered and provided by Mr. James Nuerenberg of Boeing indicates that Springbrook Creek at the Bridge, directly north of the subject property, had base flows from September 1991 to February 1992 ranging between 5 and 18 cubic feet per second. This data indicates that Springbrook Creek does not have a flow greater than 20 cubic feet per second, and therefore, would not expect to be regulated under the Shoreline Management Act. 3.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 3.1 Site Conditions During Site Visit On September 9, 1992, Ms. Theresa Henson, Wetland Specialist, and Ms. Ann Youberg, Environmental Specialist, with Shannon &Wilson, visited the subject site to locate and flag the wetland boundaries. The site visit included a visual observation of the subject site and surround- ing area. The eastern upland field 'on the subject property is relatively flat and contains a large area of fill. North and east of the eastern upland field are on-site areas that were not filled, and are considered to be wetlands, Wetland "C" and "A" respectively. South and west of the eastern upland field is Springbrook Creek. The northwestern portion of the site contains an upland field and a few shrubs. A weather station is located in the southern portion of this field. The • majority of the southwestern portion of the site contains a wetland field. North of the wetland field is a wetland containing shrubs,.a narrow upland berm, and a permanently flooded wetland with cattails. The narrow upland berm was mapped as wetland because of its shape, and position within the northern portion of Wetland "B". The southwest wetland field, shrub area and the permanently flooded wetland are designated as Wetland "B". 3.2 Topography The topography of the eastern field slopes gently to the west toward Springbrook Creek. Wetland "A" is a six to eight foot deep depression surrounded with fill slopes. Wetland "B" is a five to ten foot deep depression with fill slopes along the north and west boundaries, and a levee on the east boundary. The wetland depression continues south off of the subject property. The northwest field slopes gently to the east toward Springbrook Creek. Wetland T-1412-01 7 SHANNON&WILSON,INC. "C" is an eight foot deep depression surrounded with steep fill slopes. Based upon information obtained from a U.S. Geological Survey Topographical Map, the topography of the subject property ranges from approximately five to twenty feet above mean sea level in elevation. 3.3 Fauna • Fauna noted during the site visit included mallards, one Great Blue Heron in Springbrook Creek, goldfinches, swallows, two red-tailed hawks, California quail,various songbirds, and Northwest garter snakes. Endangered, and\or threatened animal species were not observed during the site reconnaissance. 3.4 Vegetation Species and dominance of vegetation were observed and noted at 7 plot/test holes on the subject property. The approximate locations of these plot/test holes are shown on Figure 2. The dominant wetland tree and sapling species on the site was willow. Red osier dogwood was the dominant wetland shrub species. Reed canarygrass, cattail, and yellow iris are all dominant wetland herbaceous species on the site. • There were no dominant upland tree species on the site. Blackberry, scotch broom, and thistle are the dominant upland shrub species. Pasture grasses such as orchard grass, bentgrass and fescue are the dominant upland herbaceous species on the site. Field sheets detailing observa- tions for vegetation are included in Appendix E. A listing of wetland and upland plant species observed on the site are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. • 3.5 Soils During the site reconnaissance, soil conditions, including color, texture, and approximate moisture content were observed and recorded at seven plot/test holes on the subject site. The indicators used to identify hydric soil are summarized in Table 3. Soil types observed on the subject site ranged from a gravellysandyloam (fill) to a fine sandyloam to a silt loam. Hydric Y soil characteristics were observed in four of the seven plot/test holes (Table 4). Field sheets detailing observations for soils are included in Appendix E. • T-1412-01 8 SHANNON bWILSON,INC. 3.6 Hydrology Hydrologic conditions including saturated soils and inundation as well as indicators of wetland hydrology, as defined by the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands, were observed within four of the seven plot/test holes (see Table 4). Field sheets detailing observations of hydrologic conditions are included in Appendix E. F: Wetland "A" discharges into the southeastern on-site portion of Springbrook Creek through a ditch. At the time of the site visit Wetland "A" did not contain standing water or saturated soils. A 36 inch diameter culvert discharges into the northwest corner of Wetland "B". Water from the northern portion of Wetland "B" leaves this wetland through a 24 inch culvert that discharges into Springbrook Creek. At the time of the site visit water approximately 2 feet deep was observed in the northern portion of Wetland "B". Water from the southern portion of Wetland "B" flows through a ditch and discharges into Springbrook Creek through a 24" culvert (Plate 2). At the time of the site visit saturated soils were present in the southern portion of Wetland "B". A 60 inch diameter culvert discharges into the eastern end of Wetland "C". Water from • Wetland "C" leaves this wetland through a 60 inch culvert that discharges into the northeastern on-site portion of Springbrook Creek. At the time of the site visit water approximately one foot F= deep was observed flowing in Wetland "C". 4.0 WETLAND AREAS • Based upon the use of the triple parameter approach defined within the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdiction Wetlands, three areas on the subject site were found to contain wetlands. Species of vegetation, soil conditions, and hydrologic conditions were observed at seven plot/test holes on the subject site (see Table 4 and 5). The final wetland boundary was refined through additional observations of vegetation, soils, and hydrologic conditions between a plot/test holes exhibiting wetland characteristics and a plot/test holes exhibiting upland characteristics. The • on-site wetlands were classified as wetlands due to the presence of all three wetland parameters (Table 4). T-1412-01 9 • • SHANNON&WILSON,INC. • • 4.1 Wetland "A" Wetland "A" is a Lower Quality Wetland containing three wetland classes, a palustrine forested wetland, a palustrine scrub-shrub wetland, and a palustrine emergent wetland. Wetland "A" is located along the eastern property boundary, and the on-site portion of this wetland is approximately 1.35 acre (58,472 ft2) in size. The eastern boundary of Wetland "A" is located off-site, and was not delineated. One plot/test holes (plot/test hole 2) was inspected in the • vicinity of this wetland to identify the presence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and characteristics indicative of wetland hydrology (Table 4). Wetland "A" is between 50 and 200 feet wide, approximately 1,100 feet long, and is a six to eight foot deep depression surrounded by fill slopes. Hydrology in Wetland "A" appears to be present due to precipitation and shallow groundwater. Culverts and discharge points into the wetland were not located during the site visit. Water leaves Wetland "A" through a ditch located in the southern portion of the wetland. This ditch discharges into Springbrook Creek. At the time of the site visit saturated soils and standing water were not present within the wetland. Vegetation in the northern portion of Wetland "A" is dominated by willow, cottonwood, nightshade, and reed canarygrass. The southern half of the wetland is dominated by cattails and yellow iris in the base of the wetland, surrounded by willow, and cottonwood on the slopes. 4.2 Wetland "B" Wetland "B" is a Lower..Quality Wetland containing two wetland classes, a palustrine scrub- shrub wetland, and a palustrine emergent wetland. Wetland "B" is located in the southwestern corner of the site, and the on-site portion of this wetland is approximately 4.21 acre (183,184 ft2)in size. The southern and western boundaries of Wetland "B" are located off-site, and were not delineated. Two plot/test holes (plot/test holes 6 and 7) were inspected in the vicinity of this wetland to identify the presence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and characteristics indicative of wetland hydrology (Table 4). Wetland "B" is a triangular shaped wetland, and is a five to ten foot deep depression with fill slopes along the north and west boundaries, and a levee on the east boundary. The wetland depression continues south off of the subject property. A narrow berm is located between the northern and southern portions of Wetland "B". A 36 inch diameter culvert discharges into the northwest corner of Wetland "B". Water from the northern portion of Wetland "B" leaves this T-1412-01 10 ' SHANNON FIWILSON,INC. wetland through a 24 inch culvert that discharges into Springbrook Creek. At the time of the site visit water approximately 2 feet deep was observed in the northern portion of Wetland "B". Hydrology in the southern portion of Wetland "B" appears to be present due to precipitation, shallow groundwater, and seepage from the base of the berm that separates the northern and southern portions of Wetland "B". Water from the southern portion of Wetland "B" flows through a ditch and discharges into Springbrook Creek through a 24" culvert (Plate 2). At the time of the site visit saturated soils were present in the southern portion of Wetland "B". vegetation in the northern portion of Wetland "B" is dominated by cattails and sedges. The southern portion of the wetland is dominated by willow and reed canarygrass. 4.3 Wetland "C" Wetland "C" is a Lower Quality Wetland containing two wetland classes, a palustrine scrub- shrub wetland,and a palustrine emergent wetland. Wetland "C"is located along the northeastern property boundary, and the on-site portion of this wetland is approximately 0.03 acre (1,329 ft2) in size. The northern boundary of Wetland "C" is located off-site, and was not delineated. One plot/test holes (plot/test hole 1) was inspected in the vicinity of this wetland to identify the presence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and characteristics indicative of wetland ' i d hydrology (Table 4). Wetland "C" is between 50 and 100.feet.wide, approximately 250 feet long, and is an eight foot deep depression surrounded with steep fill slopes. A 60 inch diameter culvert discharges into the eastern end.of Wetland "C", and water leaves Wetland "C" through a 60 inch culvert that discharges into the northeastern on-site portion of Springbrook Creek. At the time of the site visit water approximately one foot deep was flowing in Wetland "C". Vegetation at the bottom of Wetland "C" includes sedges, and duckweed. The slopes of the wetland are dominated by red osier dogwood and willow. 5.0 WETLAND FUNCTIONS AND VALUES • A Modified Reppert Values Evaluation (MRVE) was completed for each of the three wetland areas (Appendix F). T-1412-01 11 SHANNON FIWILSON,INC. • 5.1 Wetland "A" Based on an interpretation of the MRVE, Wetland "A" has generally high to moderate functions and values. Wetland "A" has low values in its ability to provided shoreline protection. Wetland "A" has moderate values as an aquatic study area, its ability to store storm and flood water, and its ability to offer groundwater recharge capabilities. Wetland "A" has high values in its ability to offer water purification capabilities, and potential as a cultural resource. Wetland "A" has high to moderate values in its natural biological function, and its ability to offer hydrologic support functions. 5.2 Wetland "B" . • Based on an interpretation of the MRVE, Wetland "B" has generally high to moderate functions and values. Wetland "B" has generally moderate values in relationship to its natural biological functions, its use as an aquatic study area, its ability to store storm and flood water, and its ability to offer shoreline protection. Wetland "B" has generally high to moderate values in ability to offer hydrologic support functions.. Wetland "B" has generally high values in its ability to offer groundwater recharge capabilities, its potential as a cultural resource, and its ability to offer water purification capabilities. 5.3 Wetland "C" .. . Based on an interpretation of the MRVE, Wetland "C" has moderate functions and .values. Wetland "C" has generally low values in it ability to proved shoreline protection. Wetland "C" has moderate values in relationship to its natural biological functions, and its potential as a cultural resource, store storm and flood water, its ability to offer water purification capabilities, its ability to provide natural groundwater recharge, and its potential use as an aquatic study area. Wetland "C" has high to moderate values in its ability to offer hydrologic support functions. 6.0 WETLAND REGULATION Between January 1989 and August 17, 1991, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) used the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands (1989) to identify wetlands. The Corps is currently using the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987) rather than the 1989 Manual. The transition from the 1989 manual to the 1987 manual T-1412-01 12 SHANNON&WILSON,INC. was mandated by the 1992 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, enacted on August 17, 1991. The City of Renton requires the use of the 1989 manual to identify wetlands. Therefore, this wetland delineation was completed using the 1989 manual. Wetland boundaries may differ depending upon which manual is used to identify the wetlands. Therefore, depending on which agencies have jurisdiction over wetlands on a specific project, wetlands may need to be evaluated using both the 1987, and 1989 manuals. If you plan on filling wetland on the subject property it will be necessary to delineate the wetland using the 1987 manual. It is expected that delineation of wetlands on this specific site will not be significantly different if identified using the 1987 manual. • If you plan on filling wetland on the subject property it will be necessary to acquire an individual permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers because the three on-site wetlands are hydro- logically interconnected to Springbrook Creek, which has a flow greater than 5 cubic feet per second. Individual permits are difficult and costly to obtain, and the applicant must demonstrate that the wetland impact is unavoidable and that other practicable alternative sites which impact less wetlands area are not available. Mitigation is required to offset all unavoidable wetland losses.resulting from fill.activities. . Usingthe Cityof Renton Wetland Management Ordinance No. 4346 g (March 1992) Wetlands "A", "B", and "C" would be classified as Category 3, Lower Quality Wetlands. These wetlands have been severely disturbed by human-related hydrologic alterations including diking, ditching, channelization and outlet modification, and have had soils alterations including the presence of fill, soil removal and soil compaction. The ordinance requires a 25 foot native vegetation buffer around the wetlands, since the site would have an urban Shoreline Master Program designation. A 20 foot building setback from the wetland buffer edge may also be required by the City of Renton Building Regulations. Springbrook Creek flows in a northerly direction through the center of the site. Springbrook Creek would require at least a 50 foot native vegetation buffer between the creek and any development, since the site would have an urban Shoreline Master Program designation. • • 7.0 CONCLUSIONS The soils, hydrologic conditions, and vegetation necessary for an area to be considered a wetland were found within three separate areas on the subject site. Wetland "A" is a palustrine forested T-1412-01 13 • SHANNON&WILSON.INC. (willow),palustrine shrub-scrub(willow),palustrine emergent(yellow iris)wetland located along the eastern property boundary. The on-site portion of Wetland "A" is approximately 1.35 acre (58,742 square feet (ft2) in size. Wetland "B" is a palustrine scrub-shrub (alder), palustrine emergent (reed canarygrass/cattail) wetland located in the southwest quarter of the site. The on-site portion of Wetland "B" is approximately 4.21 acre (183,184 ft2) in size. Wetland "C" is a palustrine scrub-shrub (willow), palustrine emergent (sedge) wetland located along the' northeastern property boundary. The on-site portion of Wetland "C" is approximately 0.03 acre (1,329 ft2) in size. Using the City of Renton Wetland Management Ordinance No. 4346 (March 1992) the on-site wetlands would be classified as Category 3, Lower Quality Wetlands, and would requires a 25 foot native vegetation buffers around the wetlands. Springbrook Creek would require at least a 50 foot native vegetation buffer between the creek and any development. If you plan on filling wetland on the subject property it will be necessary to acquire an individual permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers because the three on-site wetlands are hydro- logically to Springbrook which has a flowgreater than 5 cubic feet r interconnectedCreek, per E 'second. Individual permits are difficult and costly to obtain,"and the applicant must demonstrate that the wetland impact is.unavoidable and that other practicable alternative sites which impact less wetlands area are not-available. : Mitigation is required to offset all:unavoidable wetland losses resulting from fill activities.:. 8.0 CLOSURE The findings and conclusions documented in this report have been prepared for specific applica- tion to this project and have been developed in a manner consistent with that level of care and • skill normally exercised by members of the environmental science profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area, and in accordance with the terms and conditions set.forth in our proposal dated September 1, 1992. The conclusions and recommendations presented in . this report are professional opinions based on interpretation of information currently available to us and made within the operational scope, budget and schedule constraints of this project. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Wetlands boundaries identified by Shannon &Wilson are considered to be preliminary until the wetland boundaries flagged are validated by the Corps and/or the local jurisdictional agency. T-1412-01 14 SHANNON bWILSON,INC. Validation of the wetland boundary by the regulating agency(s) provides a certification, usually • written, that the wetland boundaries verified are the boundaries that will be regulated by the agency(s) until a specified date or until the regulation are modified. Only the regulating agency(s) can provide this certification. • Since wetlands are dynamic communities affected by both natural and man-made activities, changes in wetland boundaries may be expected. Therefore, wetland delineations cannot remain valid for an indefinite period of time. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) typically recognizes the validity of wetland delineations for a period of three years after completion. The • City of Renton recognize the validity of wetland delineations for a period of two years. Any development activities on a site two or three years after the completion of this wetland delinea- tion :. report may require revision of the wetland delineation. In addition changes in Government Codes, regulations, or laws may occur. Due to such changes, our observations and conclusions applicable to this site may need to be revised wholly or in part. Sincerely, SHANNON &.WILSON, INC. ��as R G))...cnivu Theresa R. Henson Wetland Specialist • Frank W. Pita, P.E., P.G. Vice President . • TRH:FWP/dgw • • T-1412-01 15 SHANNON&WILSON,INC. 9.0 LIST OF REFERENCES City of Renton, 1992, Building Regulations, City of Renton, Washington. City of Renton, 1990, Shoreline Master Program, adopted by Ordinance No. 3758. City of Renton, 1992, Wetland Management Ordinance, Ordinance No. 4336. City of Renton, 1992, Wetlands, Lakes, Rivers and Streams Maps. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe, 1979, Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Publication FWS/OSB-79/31. Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation, January 10, 1989. Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. Cooperative Technical Publication. Reed, P.B., Jr., 1988, National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88(26.9). t:. Reppert, R.T., W. Sigleo, E. Stakhiv, L. Messman, and C. Beyers, 1979, Wetland Values Concepts and Methods for Wetland Evaluation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute . for Water Resources, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1987, Hydric Soils of the United States, Prepared in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (SCS), 1973, Soil Survey of King County Area Washington. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1988, National List Of Plant Species That Occur In Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9), Biological Report 88(26.9). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1973, National Wetland Inventory Map, Renton Washington, quadrangle. T-1412-01 • 16 • I c SHANNON&WILSON,INC. TABLE 1 IDENTIFIED WETLAND VEGETATION SPECIES* Trees Black Cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) Red Alder (Alnus rubra) Western Red Cedar (Thuia plicata) Willow sp. (Salix sp.) Shrubs Black Hawthorn (Crataegus douglasii) • Douglas Spiraea (Spiraea douglasii) Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus stolonifera) Salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis) Herbs American Brooklime (Veronica americana) Bird's Foot Trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) Bittersweet Nightshade (Solanum dulcamara) Common Cattail (Typha angustifolia) Common Duckweed (Lemna minor) Common Plantain (Plantago major) Common Velvetgrass (Holcus lanatus) Creeping Buttercup (Ranunculus repens) Curly Dock (Rumex crispus) Giant Horsetail (Equisetum telmatia) Lady Fern (Athyrium filix-femina) Hardstem Bulrush (Scirpus acutus) Hedge Nettle (Stachys emersonii) Lyngby's Sedge (Carex lyngbyei) Morning Glory (Calystegia sepium) Pacific Water Parsley (Oenanthe sarmentosa) Redtop Bentgrass (Agrostis alba) • Reed Canarygrass (Phalaris arundinaceae) Soft Rush (Juncus effusus) Stinging Nettle (Urtica dioica) Water Smartweed (Polygonum amphibium) • Watson's Willow Herb (Epilobium ciliatum) Yellow Iris (Iris pseudacorus) * This listing represents the major plant species identified. There may be other species pres- ent within the subject site that are not listed. T-1412-01 , SHANNON FWWILSON,INC. TABLE 2 IDENTIFIED UPLAND VEGETATION SPECIES* Trees None observed Shrub Butterfly Bush (Buddleja davidii) Dewberry (Rubus vitifolius) Evergreen Blackberry (Rubus laciniatus) Himalayan Blackberry (Rubus discolor) Red Elderberry (Sambucus racemosa) Scotch Broom (Cytisus scoparius) Herbs Bracken Fern (Pteridium aquilinum) Bull Thistle (Cirsium vulgare) Canada Goldenrod (Solidago canadensis) Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) Dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) Fireweed (Epilobium angustifolium) Foxglove (Digitalis purpureum) �4 Japanese Knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum) Lanceleaf Plantain (Plantago lanceolata) . ' Pearly Everlasting (Anaphalis margaritacea) Orchard Grass (Dactylis glomerata) Quack Grass (Agropyron repens) Sweet-Pea (Lathyrus tingitanus) Tansy (Tanacetum vulgare) Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinaceae) White Clover (Trifolium repens) * This listing represents the major plant species identified. There may be other species pres- ent within the subject site that are not listed. • • T-1412-01 • • SHANNON&WILSON,INC. TABLE 3 HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS Hydric Indicator Diagnostic Criteria Organic Content > 50% by volume (constitutes an organic soil). Sulfidic Material "Rotten egg" odor. Soil Color Matrix Chroma of 3 or less in sandy soils. Matrix Chroma of 2 or less in mottled soils. Matrix chroma of 1 or less in unmottled soils. Gleyed colors. Water Saturation Soil saturated at 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 feet from the surface (dependant on the soils drainage class and permeability) for a significant period (usually a week or more) during the growing season. Soil Color Definitions Hue: Indicates the dominant spectral color(i.e., red, yellow, green, blue, and purple). Value: Measure of degree of darkness or lightness of the color. • Chroma: The measure of the purity or strength of the color. Source: Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation, January 10, 1989. Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, Washington D.C. Cooperative technical publication. T-1412-01 SHANNON FiWILSON,INC. TABLE 4 RESULTS OF TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROACH FOR EACH PLOT/TEST HOLE Plot/Test Hole Wetland Hydric Wetland Wetland Vegetation Sas Hydrology Determination 1 Yes Yes Yes Yes 2 Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 No No No No 4 Yes No No No 5 No No No No 6 Yes Yes Yes Yes 7 Yes Yes Yes Yes T-1412-01 SHANNON F&WILSON,INC. TABLE 5 HYDROLOGIC REGIMES AND WETLAND CHARACI hRISTICS Degree of Inundation Duration of Inundation Wetland or Saturation or Saturation* Characteristics Permanently inundated " 100% present Semi-permanently to nearly 75 - < 100% present permanently inundated or saturated • •.. Regularly inundated or >_ 25 - < 75% usually present saturated . • Seasonally inundated or 12.5 - < 25% often present • present Irregularly inundated or z 5 - < 12.5% often absent saturated Intermittently or never < 5% absent c: inundated or saturated !' * percent of growing season ** inundation > 6.6 feet mean water depth *** inundation <_ 6.6 feet mean water depth Note: Saturation implies that the soils are saturated to the grounds surface at some point in an average rainfall year. Soil saturation to the surface normally occur when the water table is (a) 0.5 feet from the surface for somewhat poorly drained mineral soils, (b) 1.0 feet from the surface for highly permeable, poorly drained, or very poorly drained mineral soils, (c) 1.5 feet from the surface for low permeability, poorly drained, or very poorly drained mineral soils, and (d)at depth where saturation occurs more than rarely in poorly drained or very poorly drained organic soils, for a significant period (usually a week or more) during the growing season. Source: Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation, January 10, 1989. Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, T-1412-01 . .. . ,.,,,,,,,,,,,..:_„_...,.,., ,. .........._...._ •4,5,75, L. ... .,,,,,-„, , .. • , N • • • .0•• l. ,, ` •y�' -2 - : �• I�• �}r .fir � 9 .'•� L RAILROAD \ •..i� j ':,fi•�:.k i.. : /. i . ,.:...:,:; r,,/.(.,.,l..u—'-,-..-.-.-.. • 7 �t`ri` /VV O4pq��\ou `yyR'' . s••� L:;:� ;/y II / \__ - \I.'N BM /I L) lei r�It. , ,1(,I.:. • 1 .�� I :.1--.'` L . ` -,;�n13\ • 11 irlV I �� 71 F■;L' •, `I ,' I I I \ I •t_ _i bsla t.^.� Coll quurse ,\ I �_ l -'�k'• ) \ Vk 1 I : -:� • \ Q� I o TrIF-RN " :' ; `` ter. • '1,(V Sewage EiLI.e LI •}' I-_ . ♦ - \ ■ -I 01 ,. tSr. ,• \ % .� a • • it I;:: .11. HI"' \. J:': ; _ I' ?/i • ` 1/ 1 r • h1111G II I 1" •• •r •' -`••• \ ,`, 7. • Pt�t r✓. '" ;c� �� n L 1. •1 -z1� it • `• ••- t� h ,�I �� 1 �' • • •� I I Eri • -`1 Track .•....� • iiiiy ▪ nBr+l k.1• i�°ie. . 1 •..:ir . 1 •... ,:.,, • =i . z• �� ■ BM E , -IN)..): II: BM,'I IIIL.I� —lilt I � ( � _..-- --- '_._.._ I f�O1 Reservoir 1 :.• ..! • �� PROJECT tl I •.• a, , ▪ .��•r i :� i LOCATION {I / '.;,. • 1� ilk 1 ;3 cB25 - 0 •• • • ; 1 1 . 7). , , II II ........ II / I It 1 r% :"...:•:.:: .!) • 1 lA ,. • • • • 0 1/4 1/2 1 • I I I I Van Woerden Tract • Scale in Miles Renton, Washington • NOTE VICINITY MAP • Map adapted from USGS metric October 1992 T-1412-01 • topographic map of Renton,WA quadrangle,dated 1973. SHANNON &WILSON,INC. FIG. 1 • Geotechrilcal end Environmental Consultants . • .::.:.... Ditch 60°CMP —� — , • , ''' . ''''.:-.„:''.. 1 • 3 ..; WETLAND "C" a� ; 3 v • I 1 ':1 1 �1 3 A ' .� PARCEL B O 1/60°CMP . 1. 1 0 O co Ditch' 1 i • 0 / -\i ...-:! 24°CMP 1 PARCEL A a 1. • 5 Ii. 1 24°CMP—' 1 6. I :INE°CLAN D•.;.B.: • 1 0 100 zoo :. : :.:.::<` .. .. .:.... : LEGENDScale m Feet ;.M Approximate : de Tract Van W oer n _____ q♦ v`<. _ .;__._.;_::Berm Loc >.,.......,.. Renton Washington Plotlrest Hole Designation--_ andApproximateLocaLon '�-- -- ifci, .�r:.__i >:.:.;':'..'r_.: .....:. NOTE ,.-. ------ . ...,. — __ iiiiiiiiII — —. .:._.�__°�" _ SITE PLAN :..:.::>::::.:.::K:.: WETLAND SI Wetland "' ' Site plan adapted from drawin rovided ,.... ,. by Bush,Roed&Hilchings,Inc.,dated 36°CMP • i. October 1992 T 1412-01 2 Photo Locations September 1992. SHANNON&WILSON,INc. FIG.2 Geote:Rii;xl zn:'emzonmerCal CoiuuMares , \ V '/{:4. VV - I \ VV - OH N k W 2 � .\S W 3 //// " \\ ` • Il f_i j�, PROJECT w S - 3 .� �;i LOCATION / I+ `zw� I r • .. S 7 W_ / J [4: ji::C.mil: Y� ` ``- k s. k 4.' it L W 3A t�`Yt..»ttK x 3/4 t^� [�.�t? tl' IA (' 4rNSY O� t � W-e a 0 i2uN�:� % , ' "11 / ,t`'-i(//'/ W — II LID_ ems. = =�3 :, '_ W - 14 i W �.22Y . r / ► $ W- 32,/ to. 1:' # W _ 3 �' �y W — 3 3 nj I ,' S — iI W- 3 (.,// r 0 1/4 1/2 1 I I I I Van Woerden Tract Renton, Washington Scale in Miles NOTE CITY OF RENTON WETLANDS MAP Map adapted from City of Renton wetlands, lakes, rivers and streams October 1992 T-1412-01 map, dated 2-7-92. SHANNON &WILSON,INC. 1 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. 3 • / .,, ` � ;.\ .t �. . -11. \ N , . 1 •.%-731- ___.,13. .....• _/,' /,•• •ii, • Ril--- • ,, , • ii .,it 4111, g. .)• ,... .___,,• ,.5 ._6/ .... ,4 1 . 1 � . i • •P•�.��r � p ' •. f •• i•• :. 1< •,n� 'ter- 15r t m • ...',. -'-';),': ?.:/'/5,4'1 .RAILR OA 0 '•\. k.„ - -''.41 •••• ••• ' ')4 g I •:;:.-- -47.-11. ..-, ''''''....--ik..*: 6 : — • . 4/ Pi . '4 ' . . ...R.q-.. •? PFOY.i,ti, ��•t • ) r NIT \ 1�,7 fa �.1h PFOWI ri N i ( _� -▪' I••r- -- J .sa`1 .\ I ,t�, i.!1SI.W41;1' . ` 3L15.1 , • •..j_ii !,!_.::_t, 1111,101..,_..J,,t,_ :v.;•E:l'!- ,1 • . .. . . .. . • "1—m .-c-C.II—. 74.-C4... .'• '.. : '..; : li'--,...-::t .•\ '• • . .• jr-4b --7.':‘\'' -I,i•• •• •-!.,1;-;11;"...\ - "" 1 i t.3. •:: ..•:•.(-[I:\••• 1/• .. • c••' . ;',,,t •,•\ „ :".• ",lt,,L I ...., .., .,-,..,-.:. 'i:i:N::):::: . re.• i i,. . ' -i =--r i i i � �i _ "\ ..aol�' IiM _�I .�� III I i %•PG III II' ! tili I'y I is' Ix Reservoir � ••I, i I PROJECT = . / ;l% !' .1`. r- • ,. . s LOCATION �;� - � ) Po II ' ��'' ) II \ 55 SnS WKZ -. . . . .(e. • r• 1� �. P Y . F� Y i V( i' II \ 16 z < /11 '� j� III �PEMY/ • . ' t ' III 1 ' "._ • 0 1/4 1/2 1 I f 1 I Van Woerden Tract Scale in Miles Renton,Washington NATIONAL WETLAND NOTE INVENTORY MAP • Map adapted from National Wetlands October 1992 T-1412-01 Inventory map, Renton quandrangle, US - Fish and Wildlife Service, dated 1973. SHANNON &WILSON,INC. FIG. 4 Geotectn cal and Environmental Consultants • P. Pu Ur ' . -- r tl III ■ �, i .' I ■: N c I ) Iyl 1 ,, I \� IGolt nI1 • _ •°' _o i. • 1 n.:" ._. '\ NIIIr, ,,„ 1.1.•••:',.. ",..' -. .--:, . . , ,_:, lyzeitast I�( I r l��ei�l- u �;}�1 U i nr9• `f �l • I IL7 on acre ' 1 Pu;: -- i :.�\ g $�iCl� . • iii:zvii Pii' . .. • •O:1 i Qi Ur • 'm 7 ReE i�� \_111 ` . .1li' iBeCI =\ • •� _I_ F�Ur 7�� Wo_ !�Jf.,,1- :• aja • ceD �ii •u 1 141 O I. • V • 1 I. ....•..,,........, .. Track \ _ .r- • �-. tr— ►••:,:. a i. :-.7,11, ' p-..,.„. :.__,: ....:1 ._ . . . 2 . .. 7. 7 ' - : 10 .. -.--..:-:•-_:-.. • .. • n'i -i 1Jg_ I ,. ❑0 Res rvoir . I - - • - • '( PROJECT s .. =.' So::'r'U: Z ; ,. ....41, . , . _, .• • m ... '. LOCATION Pu.. : i m sk = ' ... . i. ••..0 .: -i., ;- u - . --• 1 6: , )'-' )i( = 1i3 Ir,. I 169 - 20$' • I • Py _ 1 ,.5 r ` Sk I-' r. n Wo Ur ;%s • 1 r. e t • u r t • 1 - - Tu•[ _ 1 44 i ..-...;..:g.',',/,':.. --...,:..--- ..::,..,'.?:'..:, •:: :--:.:.! ,!.!.. -tY..-.:::-..; ''....:. r ,.e...3 i: -h. '., _,_ - / - \ lir':'.;-,"::'-'•;-'_____„' • .. .i .. . - • . `r-.. .:.1-L-L, , ••._—._ ,ft- - g Pii-' I_yI ?\. 7..7..4 i/1:3z;.......:. 1 ._.„...,. r.lagg, :,.-A,,.._,,,,_,:„:.:,:i..: f„,,,,:-..-..,..„,-• • ,,,,, ,,.: • ___ r.:•,,•;_.,:- , _:,..„,„,„,,,,. .. • .. ,• 11 .;., 1 • -. , ., .. .,,,:-,,,.., �`•i;{ /yam 1 I.. I - _ ?�� II1 O L 1 III t`k \`�— I f I�/ . _ , i - c"' •. -, •P ' ? ^\ • sl.� i . Ng . . `B I -�_ T . t )(A :'..:-- ' : . }Fe . 1::':.: ....4'..,7'2' , 7---- .. .' ' T, '.1 H.i.,'..• ii. ... Nk.l II N IIII g ff • 0 1/4 1/2 1 1 I Van Woerden Tract Scale in Miles Renton, Washington NOTE SOIL CONSERVATION • SERVICE MAP •. Map adapted from Soil Conservation Service, soil survey of the King County October 1992 T-1412-01 area, Washington, dated 1973. • SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. 5 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants • SHANNON&WILSON,INC. APPENDIX A WETLAND DELINEATION METHODOLOGY • T-1412-01 • ' , SHANNON&WILSON,INC. APPENDIX A WETLAND DELINEATION METHODOLOGY The triple parameter approach of the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdiction • - al Wetlands (January 10, 1989) was used to delineate the extent of wetlands on the site. Under this methodology, vegetation, soils, and hydrology are each evaluated to determine the presence or absence of wetlands. Based upon local agency guidelines for the use of this method, an area is considered to be a wetland if three of the following conditions are met: (1) dominant hydrophytic vegetation is present in the area, (2) the soils in the area are hydric, and (3) the necessary hydrologic conditions within the area are met. The Plant Community Assessment Procedure and Plot Inventory Technique, as described in the Routine On-Site Determination Method (Federal Manual For Identifying And Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands, January 10, 1989), were used for the evaluation of triple parameter criteria for this project. This methodolo- gy was selected because differences in vegetation types were easily observed, aiding in the s; identification of areas likely to meet the hydrology and soils criteria of the triple parameter approach. r Wetland boundaries were determined by conducting a walking inspection of the property. As part of this inspection, species of.ve vegetation, soil conditions, and hydrologic conditions are noted P� �� P� g � at several plot/test holes to more accurately determine the boundaries of on-site wetlands. Wetland Vegetation Hydrophytic plants are plants specially adapted for saturated and/or anaerobic conditions. The • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and the USFWS has assigned an indicator status to many plant species that is based upon the.estimated probability of the species existing under wetland conditions. Plants are categorized as Obligate(OBL), Facultative Wetland (FACW),Facultative (FAC), Facultative Upland (FACU), and Upland (UPL). Species with an indicator status of OBL, FACW, or FAC are considered to be adapted to saturated and/or anaerobic (i.e., wetland) conditions and are referred to as hydrophytic vegetation. Additional information concerning characteristics of hydrophytic plants may be found in Appendix D. Trees within a 30 foot radius and shrubs and herbs within a five foot radius of each plot/test hole were identified and noted. The approximate percentage of cover for each of the different • T-1412-01 SHANNON&WILSON,INC. plant species occurring within the tree, shrub, and herb strata was determined. Dominant plant species are considered to be those that, when cumulatively totaled in descending order of abundance, exceed 50 percent of the areal cover for each vegetative stratum. Any additional species individually representing 20 percent or greater of the total areal cover for each vegetative stratum are also considered dominant. The indicator status of the dominant plant species within each of the vegetative strata was used to determine the presence of hydrophytic vegetation near each plot/test hole. A plot/test hole was considered to have hydrophytic vegetation if greater than 50 percent of the dominant plant species within the area had an indicator status of OBL, FACW, or FAC. • Throughout the area delineated as wetland, identification of hydric soils was aided through observation of surface hydrology. The areal extent of hydric soils was defined through the direct soil observation within several plot/test holes placed both inside and outside of the wetland. Hydric Soils . • Hydric soils are defined as those soils which are saturated, flooded, or ponded for a significant period of time (usuallyseven consecutive days or more) duringthe growingseason. As a result "s Y of anaerobic conditions, hydric yd c soils exhibit characteristics directly observable in the field, including high organic matter content, greenish or bluish grey color(gley formation), accumula- tion of sulfidic material, spots of orange or yellow color (mottling), and dark soil colors (low chromas). Additional information concerning hydric soil characteristics may be found in Table 3. All soil observations were completed within soil plot/test holes dug with a shovel to a depth of at least 18 inches below the existing ground surface. Soil samples were examined for the presence of hydric indicators. Soil organic content was estimated visually and texturally. The presence of sulfidic material was determined by the presence of sulfide gases (i.e., a "rotten egg" odor). Soil colors were recorded after being determined through use of the three aspects of color in the Munsell Soil Color Chart: hue, value and chroma (e.g., a soil designated as 10YR 6/2 has a hue of 10YR, a value of 6, a chroma of 2, and a soil color name of light brownish gray). A soil chroma of two in combination with soil mottling or a soil chroma of one without soil • mottling typically indicates a hydric soil. Additionally, if soils were found to be saturated within 18 inches of the soil surface, they were considered to be hydric. T-1412-01 SHANNON&WILSON,INC. Wetland Hydrology Hydrologic conditions identifying wetland characteristics occur during those periods when the soils are inundated permanently or periodically, or the soil is continuously saturated to the surface for at least seven consecutive days during the growing season. The growing season begins when the soils reach a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit in the zone of root penetra- tion. Additional information concerning hydrologic regimes associated with wetlands may be found in Table 5. The hydrology was evaluated by direct visual observation of surface inundation or soil saturation within 18 inches below the existing ground surface in test/plot holes. In the absence of direct observation of hydrology, the area near each plot/test hole was examined for indicators of wetland hydrology. These indicators include dried algae on bare soils, cracking of mud, soil mottling along live plant root channels, water marks on vegetation or rocks, and drainage patterns. It was not possible to observe conditions during the entire growing season. Therefore, it was assumed that wetland hydrology is present for at least seven consecutive days during the growing season within the area of the plot/test holes where positive indicators of hydrology were noted: CK T-1412-01 SHANNON&WILSON,INC. • APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHS i• • T-1412-01 . . -e. .. . , t.---- 1/4_:- 4 ,.. ,. •—•;. --P• '4'.' ' .?..4- -'4: - ...1-• -• ',". - - ,,.., :•-.--,... s..., •,. y..,.-i. - •-•• !; •• , .Z. -_- kte- -,, •. . • .•.,,,•-,g,Vi.,„.„-,, Av....,4p1VA ....'' '''',.44,4.1f.tcM4,4p,,,t,Y,Al'JA.,,r,,.11.;?.,.,;.,:-...0;.....1...;. ,,,,t.,,,i. .•.;,,--.....1:,,,,,;e, •,..."'_„,.. ,14N,.r.,,,y.,4,„ 7...W1,.--vAl t,,..-0.1 .,)1,.?X',,,44 . ,,,_<-&,,..„ ,,. ',...itiZ-2-1 6,44,,,,:.,N,"1,,,',.....2N17.•;,,t-.,,.tt,,..2„,..•ti••;-;..-.,..;ti;3;,,p.,, PA, `'f'-',Vci•lti.',A.P,AailiA,Viik‘Itti-IN r,...in- '''ZIttf,'A".",..A;r4:-'‘'7041...%.,i t,4,71...-..2 t.;,.•. . - - .1,:%.,..-=‘?.',,,..:4•tt',: ,,,,,,-,,i,,e-0„--1..,..,10,:fip.,., ,,,,,,,,..114,-„,itu..4,,,,,,.,,.-4$4,,,,,,..„4-,‘-i,k‘Ar...4.,,,,ig.,-kst,1,...x.,p„--itti•-•,,,mq,3•.i.„4-•,41-1,,,,,,„:>:;f4..,,,,,..-,,..,,,,lif',,,,,,,,..k.,,,,,,,.:„.,--a,..,.-.i.,‘‘,1-,..,,,--;,..) ....:. .\?1 ,',.'":.• :0-) . t,gf. ,-, ,,,,,,-,-1A,10%.:::;,-,i,i7v4:-.AT:me..‘ 5-'-.4.,;'.,,'-7zi-,•74-1-7,±1,, ,i'i ii ..k.', V,-ft'.'AI, TJ.,„!r„.vol-NT.,i11-24V.1r.,...'•%1:•,,,IL,',4-•Pt:.. ;.-4,.,,,..A.r,•0.•:kt- .7..•',.1",-,•--•r\e,„,-. .,_•,:".•-t7;„3.•,,.....-,‘-‘,...','!. .... \ !,1,tk ',t t,& ti.N.1.1,y,r,ISS44.:!*-; , :.,:pAe4.,_•,•:„--,:::7,--••-_,I....N.?\-$:;t4fi"i •i,•"•-•.;„.; 'r,-'. i.'',5--7 .:.":',.'',''''' =.k‘,. 0.1,4,'•• 7‘,.."•C,",•f.'41...,}t<?s•i• i''.4•)41•,,\*4•c';'''‘NVOZ"'••.X.",,O•Fils4 .41S .:i''..../,`,,,I'li,'.;•:: -•. s:',;-i,,`'. ..- .•-•-•,'.:-S.'",,./C-On:- ''',,V4Z Ai.t.-4,*.43' '... ‘f_,.226,.-.3k-Z4'''t-P4;';'&4%,,, Z.V4 -v,..,..'-i..t.,74-„,.':.;4 :,'''":-.....'''...*,...,,---'z'li''-i4.\'-t •-''' \, ..1.kk 411,;!,'S..''`.„!k4.1,....(,.". ‘i,;4,-;,. ...1/4'...:Qr',?,1-A,A..`,11,...;,.,t.. ..,,,,i';,.,l'4.:;Z4.41. ...':,q,,.:•73,`,-;‘,-,'.t.;.i.:.!.:7,-`. '-,-:',.. .....;.=- ,---' ,'•,--- ‘‘'--'\'1:\°''‘'. ' '4.Y* 'A":11"W‘ ' . 4-''''.11sVil'i''' '$1 :4';14'atSk'-'-`11-• ••A:k:W.•-:<;f•,e1.:-.,< '',4.4.;.."7•"..- -:----"'-_:`-c,'-''''... -2.-...;,'4` . ;\.„,••.,„ ',....‘,•:\...,,`i." ,,,s.iN,, .„,.'‘.....> :•.,: r.&.,_.-.1.i..?-!,„,,if)"'',...4.,-, ..Q.:,,,C.,..'z'k•- ',let'Cir-7-,----,,-•--- "•••:''''-r.-.t-_-. .-7"F4--f-al...•:-,-,•`'''- 4 .•:;.?;;' 4411.1..,,,..`:-. S'At,,\.'t•,,N..)**,,:i..„,„\-„,. .z.C .:)--..„,.-,'' ..:',`.-.... ..:,..••-F•-`,_4;-,..!-•v..-.13:_- ..'',-;'--t• i•• -.. ---,....".--..7.- - ,- •Tx.;.• •A • . ..........-.--_,J.h. ,,,,4.1.,-.„. ,.t.. . -,•,_ , 4.'',.•• - '1,,,,,•.' 1-‘,71kr, -..-•!Q•k,z,•iek....--4„...a.... -•,,,--...,..‘,... v:,,,,-.. ,-- -.1,--4-• ----,-.---44,.,:- pok,,..z..,,,, , , .:.-,„,..•,‘,.. ,..11„,,,\:‘,.....,• -..,.. -...,,,,,,- ,41,x,,,,...k.._ .--,,,,,--,..,..-_,..„,./„...-_,,,....„.•....„-,...4.„- ::,,,.. ,N,-„, „.,-... .• ..... ., .... -k. - •.,_ ' ,-,4,--..,,, ,.. ..:-.?•:-.1,. -.7,..,:z,..N.,- ;, --_, ,:;:vz.,,--...•-tio,,,, 4,,,L -,,.....1 - ,...- , , ...,:e.„0\ - -.,....%N.-.4.. .,.,,,..,, ,.. :-...„..- ........,,,..,,,,,.., . i ,,,..,:_. ::,,,,,,„,,,,: , ..N.11.,,,-.. ,..„.. ,,,,,,z7,,,. :.;•.,,,,,,-..-os.. -....., ,t...,____-:-..-„,____,-,3,,,,..,,Tz-...,,,s,,,,-----ii.,_..---- ---.,......-.r.- ::-.,:, Photo 1. View north. Shrub vegetation in the background indicates the location of Wetland "C". The field in the foreground is representative of the eastern upland field. .- ‘............-.-.-..p7,...„,- . - . , ...,....,..:IV , :-,,:.,;:.:.......,„:: .Z,....,s, ' . •.'' ..1"...'"....-...4 - ' ••••• - -.,. "'.:.'....-''' ''''-':'-"=P- .., ,, ,,..,r44:-,.kr . -..>•_,,,,.,,.__ -• •_,-.. :.,;.;'.1.1.;„..,:i,._ ••.,'• -,...- '•••:,--= '• . '--;''-"..'. .:''...': "..:::,,tit a ..-.7,--4......-,...,,-Pm, . .. i...t . • , ..., --.,. .,''''',":':'-•%''ea'Llt • • -',_-:;,' ' ..- „.: .-','\•-•1'.''''''; .'"-•!'‘,:: ''',...-- '''s r^t6 ' .7--‘-.::.----- —''.' • ' :'.f;NI .--..' _."—'' :?.. .....1•5•-'4., .'‘._" .,-,--$.- • — .......",.=•W'; .. z......'.:.— - -1.- r e 4'; ... , ":... -- 4'.- ' t '1• , ..... ' -• .. ',..e.- , • 7S.%•• '' '"'-tPr,•••-::• 1*.;.-' .2.., 1••,". . . . • - ..', ••• • •".,. . ' • ,./ -: e- •'.'" `'..•••`..- .• . -,--, --. -,--7cy-; -. :•,• ,-:, . -- . ,- ..., -. ..: „ s.c.,, , : - •,-, -.,...:-. ,,,,,;.-,.-- .„ \•f- -„ •':..,:"..,v*. • et, r,...v.-'',,;',..1 ' • •t ,-- . :".-•:::,•,• -r1,-%-sr:•J''' ••1-- i _;, _ ,- I'•..,,,: .;•_0.--.1,.:••..41$4. ,, ...- t'\'?!..-51.-?eJ;;c s :- "v)•;'1..'7 ''..Vr5.:4.f";?'•';itirarlziki\l' i''''ki' let- 4,;;-PC40/4ifiPV ,_.i..- --,--.... .- --•Ft4:_, .••• '- _.-41-' „,_-:,p' •tr•-1•KM1'<*z,t04t. . v :4,1e. ' e,,,t,, „-.4.,,,,,.40,g-J-..f4 .....,...,,, 41.,.-.:1,,...., -• .„ ,.,,.,-, ., ,.,N•t ....,a1 - -t --14irp....„--, .,...9„, .,.. -.t.L.,,, ,,,4 tmh.... -4:' ....,-• -•-,7. l' t'-',-;',-'44 rj,`"-d-:"-v-t'?•*:''cr''',kit.•;.::•• ->-`. .,..,"•L'ek,r,iti.,A,,,,,-,V;•1',itkx"Y.",...)''''' I 14, fg'-'..• y'4i`i‘'."Y,#f"'''.112,5i,,kF.,2. ',; ....:-.S.'- :-, ..,P•rr,<...,7,4-",-,.•,-g-1.',.?, 44-,i41,'-,..4_,,,ipk) f-A,,c',i."5;s4:Ai4-14•I'er-TA'..mePt1471.4.'1*e:A-fli. , 1-1F,t3i I %;'-t'•- --.,` '.--'-' ,.1. ..1..;••••---•,--h--14--k-g--t•-;--,#-....)f.i,.rivs.v.v ,t1-,,,,t vf-4-tA - ( ' ," ,A.`k. ei -,,,-!",:.::".....›-.':'•?.. . .vr‘•;...V7.- -,s-'''''.)•?';1' yai .".4.,14 t''''4"•• .7.V4_,.-1-'41....:al:Ir7.14,-t''•44-1-riPq•ly 51 `c,.-'•t - .,V,•,„740 Ay If 1 h....*• 4,,,,I,, Pl..,..,,1.1., ,..,,,.1,,7,, , ..41,,,F„..;:w...,4,f,,1,,it..... ir .s.'y, ..•,' Ter. ''41: ' .... , I:. rtlai.. , , „Pe's "titt..5... .(k-r .t.A 3 .77, ....•..a '. ,'',,-1 ." '.`)r- ' 4 '. : ..,•,' , X-4:1•.' 44,•'',. f• 4 4 -4, - ' .4 „, , .0. „ 4 ., AL. ,. • if,,if,"i 7 1 .,..,..z.if ,- i,,,,,16;,,, .3 .t.v,14 r,54,44_,VV, . Snitv.‘7.7t 1,-...-.0, 14,-",,+' • pl• , ., +4 ., . ,-,..-ij.ttM/J4-4:.;tA 1-,-.417,11,1,41.,r, , t ••..1,/-4. ,,, z • i, ' -AT'. ..-fr' - 4, -4:A- -.4 , eyb.-t54.4g4co ... .,. ..... 1,....4K.,, -.,,, v^,-f-t"'s-,*vWJ,.,,,,;,'v./.1 ,n.,,, 1.,". :1" -1"..-.1.,•-',..V ,' fi :e. • •--7;11 i„,-,... , Ill,. 15t 1 ilt*, - :'$-j- ''s7.,,4;t'.?', ;4'17 '.:1P.N.(474.,...,.''' ,..1,. •V4 4 er,,,, ; -.f. --- ,,, , 'ir 41' -51 i.'3, '"4C''Vitel..<4 IP`If% WI 'AVM • ' l'. . ?1• 5-i° ' - ''i; V. a Photo 2. View southeast. Shrub vegetation in the left hand portion of the photo indicates the location of Wetland "A". The grassy field is representative of the eastern upland field. Van Woerden Tract Renton, Washington PHOTOS 1 AND 2 October 1992 T-1412-01 i SHANNON &WILSON, INC. FIG. A-1 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants I [ -- 11116 . . , --.., . . ',....• e , ..4•23' IX 11h,, 1F• ,7,4-a....•,,,,,,,,:,i:•-zyi:r.. s---- - -'•.:-...`g--......,.. . - ...' -•,..,.:-. k ' - . f• YeSe" rt.f7e+,-i - 0 *.,..1_;,-4,-, , -.'z.t.••••,-;„.T41. -..,-:er:INTI-.-,,Es..4:5,-',Irt,,...`t...,.._•,-.' :•-•f.ir-4.-'%6 s',...1....c.•.',.q.;.:i.,151:...._,Vi; 7;.',.. -4•.• 1: s-4',:.:Iri4;,11A;M:1-• :q l' 1.11E VACr ..;.?,,i,..,4 -•.1'k' 14:(00,,r1;.ei77,:i-P17i1--k'•;:i,,,,!!' ., r-••":-*Allr'll' - I: ..." •- '--.. r•'1?,,, . . :-1..1".• •."I','• 1.1*.1,.. ?1,•,.,..,....t' :t,.*)f-r.' 7.,.....,_,....,;tAN . 'T'.',4",-4. .'..):..*---X, .4,04...s ..):1 ,V,i...11.,X,4 [T•:3 .... 7 7 ..t. •••3•., .....• -.7•7' -‘.. . •'r. ''',. , '':1.'lintP5.:3*.;;AX•*Y..' ''V 11.,,,,,4 :!, r';.-14 .,.-egly:t...iVilik.1-',..it ,-.C,SICIt'-;-'7'11.'4. 5-t• / ,7 1,,,!..; i ', ;;;713,ic.,4:4i;et,I 1„1'f'rti. ' l'.iil .t.;f4t..1).;,‘...?‘:‘,":‘,Trirq.,'F.Yr4.44..7:S•A :7 3''.7e( •k.i.i....C.r.W., L..,33 • ot.. . 1.4"i''::.1,"'t'14......1,K.',011...,1 k \Nr . :k,\,,4.!-,- -,„1,•,,4.`---1...t-.V.','$ A,.„1 t, .ii` =./1 .,,•:". -144,1.-;-4,(7.... i -2 .---•• • -'rir•T., •- --;-•1,,,-,- ... rip-i t.-LF1:1"4,...,,,,AI,,,,.., 10-..._(...t,.,tir?I r .1'_1 1-2:- , ""3:E.,':,`.,.,,,-..?„y,.. '',...7-c.ii 7. : ',i ,4 . - 11(.., ,,l-f,ria-4...,,, :.,,,, ...:4• 1'-•-f---c,.....q, .,,,.'-,.,_ _.••-•‘--,;-:/;,----"-1:-_---.';*. w..- ,',.,..,,_ ,I., !,4,... ,,,,'5.k k.k„..., -N ,46,'_,,) ,'1, .i-AT,*;,,-,-1 ,--- ;1-• , h 1---- -,' ,.._._;___.,,- ,,..-4-' - ;7' 14'7' 1,1?".•.--.7, 1'ic ..( '. ; ! -Nri i q.,,v,racf,--.%. , ,!, ;Iv -, , ., 1-.7 , ,,-..-..s - .,.0. . ...., 4 ., ,i.... . t.„ _ t , ..7... .. • /NC 1,--- 1' ,mi.( ,,. - i .. 1, , -.,-..v. -c-7 '-- 1 , ''';'&'-' • "" i '1 ,, r i e p /, V i ', ,....----- '-,r'pr' , .. .-a.I. N • . 7 4,' • •*-- -__r.:----- , -4--.: •'.1... e _,-"--2- -L-/-/ i st.:-. • ,i. — - ---..---..- 1- , • - .' , ,', " r ".„..•-• •••--7---..•-•--, __ ..-4.--- 4.-•, ' k . )1 I -4 -- .- -1,., \ ,-;.44 / ;--.---- ... :. , 1 ' .1 „,- ---•;„•• .,,,_ •----' • . • • 1 ).:..;' ---.1 A : . -''-'. I' 1 ---- N. .: , 1 ---/7.7: ________-1 —4--- i.:„1-1 / /....'''.1.. rr -- N- ••• ' ---1'. :." I • . 'r.•;\ '' / ' ,-/ ', _--1., ' '' '' -;%-;--."-----, 7°- / vi ,-7/ i .- . 1 •.',4 , i ._\ ,.•f/ , , ... ; • , \ • ' // ' 1t . ,- i • — • •/ t. . 1 • '1'f .*•J:' '' ..'""ftilit J• _-- \-1, ' Fr,,,,. .,, ii.,:‘'t ' f,,' 71 . •=. __...„ , _.. "-- _.• d in the Photo 3. View east. Yellow iris and cattail wetland locate portion of Wetland "A". southern • ri r: I:, v r 1.-.. P . . ,....z.,,...r„: . , ..„.-...r.,..2 .7 k t, -, •, k: -1 '4"!... •v•-,.: , •• -:- .....:...lb,.,A ,,,...4 . s jt ''' il. ......FA V4,.1,. 1 .4.,., ,Al., JZ:'' -; ,•i ' .; Y ';'. ---Ih " 11'11 ,..,i,i,,,k.e...„s iz..k.... .t- ..;,'' ..<4,X.,,:reLliott.,,, .. .....:--1.,„Eg" -.-.-..11,us,00 4'. '' t --,-"Ac;: :,'"?=.- ' - ---, ,.. ... ..,.,..#--__,--.-.--4,-2-ca, ..,.. n-A.,---,—t-__,,... -ii,,;.•,,j-li.ii,te, ,t-•; •`••„.;.,,,-4- ‘,, , :,.. --:-• _,,,-.• -- :_. ,-...„,-,-Y.,.,'1.-7----:-.-. -5c•-••;cr_--- ,'„"- re-,--7..--.:i$, ••---:•-‘-'1•••`•-••••-t/--filifz-, .:";44' .417- ,r• - 1-.' •4,',".44f,r- ?''• ,..•.- , ''' •-1,.,••••,— -',..r,;---1-9,•s--. F•-•'„ :-..,--..: -Y•••• "%."'=-----1 :tr- '.• ••., 44-3.."'' " • - . ... , -- -." .-,--...%',--..A., ,..?. .1-. --.. • ps. ...4'--.w -.. r ...674:4-i--i-d,,,:g1 '.k•.,-' --'7..i. 9f.-, -,:..:-.$ .1/4; ..-^,, 't•-• : -' rt.i 4 e` .•-•-`Zst.'d ... 41..r--1-.7.,1,„:,,-!...:e.e-;.,4, ' ;•-•' r„.1,..i'",.:-.4'''',,, ..:1,,,,,-,..• 1,•', 1t, V".4 l'r'/:: , • •If• s:''',:....",go.--.'"-..C.-',..--,-;;..-• ' '•••. . .. .. 1 --'.- .. ff.--.........,tm , --,r—r- •,?-,,, ,', .. ,.;- ..„—g.... i..- ,- ,-..,..i—;4',.,44V44,4-, t,1%-;----;-..,;•--fe.'-`-‘•%," *,C,;".-',.• . .::::^•::):1. ..,,,5,4=3,* 1._ s:‹,..,..5._:g...,,,,,-1,-;:lit,.. -.1',.._6-.-g---g—„,,---- . 3., ,...„.„..4„:..k._. --.,:-., ,,,t.f., ,,......,-;„ . ...c.r,-, :,..4....r: roe.- .&"*1;' ' -.1. - -.• -....-*7-gli; z 7..?..'i.A.f.'"Z t,' '-, ...r- "i -'"-"•4...-... -..,r' •ctS 7:St' ,..,, ,..!: 'VV. -1/..'...V.; • ', ' •;:i-t..., .. .. .,_,L;-`1-(11..44--A.-4 .,:,2:01%4-4;et--- -k-s-'•-•i' ;,A1Pr'.•••• -,•••-"k".;;Pl•:444 i",•:•;',.:, .•••'' -,- --' •-- :-:";-,-4•,:ers"-,,,,A-33.,5-•'"44!..- x..,,-0:--•:. , ".4,‘,....-'--, i,:,,f_z, st,,,., • ••••'<,_:-- -,,,,,V."6-7,_.- .;,•i- 41 ‘1..-sre.A-,:e'--,--sx--rt.:7 ..17-..-. e_..„ .,....., -.,:„.... 1...: ..-4 •..-..--A.„._::,..._,-........4,e:F., ....... e" ... -'- .,.,,S,E...,,..4 -4-z .44.K.4.C'ff. ,"'. .:-.7.-.,,/•'‘tqlS.01-7: C..f• t.. '.•- ,c JAWCI'F.3''''';• _.4 e":4 'N4''•',At-- 7 1 :'.. ,: 4 1.,. -.,- - ., :"Voi,..,- li- 'P" '4;'''.?: -,,‘,&:,._., '/.. X.r.7..f.../:"4.4 :tf,th' ,'-n4,..".--'2::2.q3,1•')- rt ..__, .-f'-'11'. - ••• . 4 ,„4.-4.--.477„, „•,.. - , ..1„,„ ..-44-j,..,c-.L.:,?., ..-,:s.,_,_.•- _••,••••,, r4 , ''.'i,,;-Pir.V.:$'•.".1..3.:t.. .. ...,:j".frAV.? I''' _r ..c„ ,,..-`....,... .1.4,..f 7m....--r_•-4,-, ,,,,d.k.,7,.—._•,,1-. -...--v-e -.........._.v. or.:' -""•,7_,' :Lks7-4,-,; ••4 :.,.. •?,.•:,...-.. ,57ks•-••airg4-m-: '-•_9,''--''' -; k • r.P'Z2-:'.4',71r :--_•,-7" '- - -,13_,dgis,1/4 '7 .''' hi.•-, - 5 ''''''— ,/- --,---`'": -'-' -0-'kt...,..1'4:-.-V:5-e• ' portion of Wetland "B". isthe scrub-shrub Photo 4. View background porno • n of the photo . west. Sprin,_abrook Creek in the foreground. In the left Van Woerden Tract Renton, Washington PHOTOST.3 AND 4 October 1992FIG A.4.12-01 SHANNON &WILSON, INC. 2 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants I It of•t. -S-\, ��m�[.. � jit 4` ' T♦i �,^•F 7 t -cY : 7i36r� }J , �rz "' ~ .'• to _ t - ` J t,,0}, +1 J,i• :.i• , .t.\t - ,','-,- ,- y t ", t•.:,..:!'.,fr,,.1, 4..r--.-----Ni."„.-"-.:;.,-...?A:,7•,$;:\ .-.!, • , Lr 1 , • } �\ ` ' o ' •; \; �: �^l�' `-_� J•t t� .� � \ ,;1 . `ti p �• , i r -!r 4, •t~ i ': \ ,:t ? � 4 ` .-{, .... -... - �1+ , X � ` 3,. k:, %t -: k *k om Photo 5. View south. Reed canary grass field in Wetland "B". • i,� } .. ,Wi : �q" sr i 1 . •x •�,,N{ i , C`i � ..;;!.A.?..':',: -fIl7A1 t J,,, . q xr ' •,, r: ..sr r/• rw t a '21, t~t�1• 'v f 'n4e�.•4.1 f ,K r ` . .,fit _ .. .11, •. / k: ,x: <,t j • . - �, .. •�l+ t .j ri:a�t'1 �, , r r7r t . r r y o-•-f(-,'' ,t ,• i;• �, ,t•' - /!_ / •,. • .� ! is l''I'�'ff 7 !'�' � ti T !`. • 1 i f1 r 1 1,u, t f !' �N �r' ,icl 1. / 1 1 tl�,�5 t j 1 t r h i "V, t!<, •'�/ • r , s ! y • •Hui. n s S 'i/r,.47'4 4- ".e x�iT' •4. �{ ;4 * 11(`,L� 4#- b[ •y ��-S L 'Eu.,:•t1 ,� 4f Z.'-",;:.9 Z... tyr"ry,,.ff`- ti..`4a v. r-I iq\ i '"Y ' f,-r is. . -- Y. < .r/ri, rti t 1 k;1 . -ybu J.vYF.,rr` ( ',1;'<f, t l '.ft4 C,Ir uf..:-r r /1l-• itr J S E :4 , y `�! 1 �� ., i t\t 1 S` i ;.("4 1 , w�_,..-4,.. t '�.t.q" 1•44.41i,..'02',ViO.i7-letZ., •' 7- ' f a' �. ,,.. , Rr. y k IIPPP�I.. ./j '` R *+ '+^ "fit :'elf. l ` J ,' ' t% H,..'. t'•:G'•-.1 'JiI l'.5.1:17'if (341y`54`:',114�.j ,l': 1 A'lk.:= ,�y,;. P''�.e ., i ''.i .�+t 110.,1\1� ':ii�. !4\ i 17l �`•' f 1,` n'r' Isll` .`4r:r4l..r 3 f'J',:: .i,V �r �'Qrn Il�tl� • , • lfi'}!,'' i�t' it7•r ,..• l' .` ,,4i' ytle t',,. 1,i'ftli .''(. 14.. f;r t. i t .; aa .i.'?'iiii7_et�'�rr�' ., /t.ail f A 1 4.1 _��S• :�;j.�.•r� • . ,.y b`t:'r•,.,..titt.. ,�` "N • • f ` �'.i.• , .1'YY:1.•t,f... ! '1 t� .. \�•'.: :iti'' . ,Fry, ,�; S�; 1. ,'\g,t '',;'•'�`'.:r_i:'ij^` .i,1 �.'.' i,t " •'\Yy4�iw�1 : , �'' _;r :1 C ,4, .ti''i.t!'/,' F•' it 4' ' Photo 6. View west. Springbrook Creek. Van Woerden Tract Renton, Washington PHOTOS 5 AND 6 October 1992 T-1412-01 SHANNON &WILSON, INC. FIG. A-3 ' Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants • • i'+ ta.w2. ..z. ,{r,y . M TjYs `. x .. Ffy.i T t -r2.Y 3' �y ,{L}K, u`? },•' 2 y,` ! F `C T.z�a4kSrM-5�Z}}r t F#t:� i�,�F,�..�ry�:.,s'ZtS55h?'R��y_?•nia'�r�+ TJ v�'t••2'�a�` } ..�r-tis.t y :F . i�''7 t:��y1"F ` {aitJr 3'•�''rft.�at$ 3. '` k(rtZ C, 4•5e 'd t q �` 4'y .. 5 K } } t n -a 1+F i,t i s ; ,( 5" : `'c ,''y t'• • • • • •r .. l -. 'iG•✓ } •I pt t 4: • • Photo 7. View west. The northwestern upland field. • Van Woerden Tract Renton, Washington PHOTO 7 October 1992 T-1412-01 SHANNON &WILSON,INC. FIG. A-4 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants SHANNON FiWILSON,INC. • • APPENDIX C DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE NONGAME DATABASE INFORMATION (will be forwarded once it is received in our office) • T-1412-01 SHANNON&WILSON.INC. APPENDIX D DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DATABASE INFORMATION T-1412-0I _-°Y:_ WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF • kfra- Natural Resources • NagEir BRIAN BOYLE Commissioner of Public Lands • OLYMPIA, WA 98504 October 22, 1992 Theresa Henson Shannon & Wilson Inc PO Box 300303 • Seattle WA 98103 SUBJECT: Wetland Delineation in Renton (T23N R04E S24 SE) • We've searched the Natural Heritage Information System for information on • significant natural features in your study area. Currently, we have no records for rare plants, high quality native wetlands or high quality native plant communities in the vicinity of your project. The Natural Heritage Information System is a cooperative effort between the Department of Natural Resources' Washington Natural Heritage Program and the Department of Wildlife's Nongame Program. The Washington Natural Heritage Program is responsible for information on the state's endangered, threatened, and sensitive plants as well as high quality native plant communities and !? wetlands. . The Nongame Program :manages and interprets data on wildlife species of concern in the state. For information on animals of concern in the state, 1 . please contact the Nongame Program, Washington Department of Wildlife, 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, WA. 98501-1091. The Natural Heritage Information System is not a complete inventory of Washington's natural .features. Many areas of the state have never been thoroughly surveyed. There may be significant natural features in your study area that we don't yet know about. This response should not be regarded as a • final statement on the natural features of the areas being considered and doesn't eliminate the need or responsibility for detailed on-site surveys. • I hope you'll find this information helpful . • Sincerely, cSCIAJ'-'64 04 • Sandy Norwood, Environmental Review Coordinator Washington Natural Heritage Program Division of Land & Water Conservation PO Box 47047 • Olympia, WA 98504-7047 (206) 902-1667 • Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer SHANNON&WILSON.INC. APPENDIX E DEFINITIONS OF PLANT INDICATOR STATUS USED ON FIELD DATA SHEETS • Indicator Category Definition OBL Obligate Wetland. Occur almost always (estimated probability >99%) under natural conditions in wetlands. FACW Facultative Wetland. Usually occur in wetlands (estimated probability 67-99%), but occasionally found in uplands. FAC Facultative. Equally likely to occur in wetlands or uplands (estimated probability 34-66%). FACU Facultative Upland. Usually occur in uplands (estimated probability 67-99%), but occasionally found in wetlands (estimated probability 1-33%). UPL Obligate Upland. Occur in wetlands in another Region(as defined in the National List of Scientific Plant Names), but occur almost always (estimated probability >99%) under natural conditions in uplands in the region specified. 93 NI No Indicator. These species have not been given an indicator status. They are assumed to be upland. Source: National List Of Plant Species That Occur In Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88(26.9). 89 pp. SHANNON&WILSON.INC. • • • • • APPENDIX E DEFINITIONS OF PLANT INDICATOR STATUS USED ON FIELD SHEETS • 1 • • • T-1412-01 • SHANNON FIWILSON,INC. • MODIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROACH WETLAND "C" • Site Van Worden Tract Date 9-9-92 Staff TRH/AMY Plot# 1 • VEGETATION Trees Status % Cover Herbs Status % Cover • Red Alder FAC 5 • Reed C marygrass FACW 90* • Black Cottonwood FAC 5 • Canada Thistle FACU Trace • Morning Glory FAC Trace Shrubs Status % Cover 4 Willow sp. FACW 30* • • Red-osier Dogwood FACW 20* ♦ Canada Thistle FACU 5 *idominant species % of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 100% % cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: 150% Hydrophytic vegetation? Yes • SOILS . Series/Phase Puyallup • On hydric soils list? No • Aj horizon: depth 0-8" matrix color 2.5Y 4/3 Dry mottle color No depth of sample 4" Soil type: (sand, clay, etc.) Sandy Loam B'horizon: depth 8-18" matrix color 2.5Y 7/2 mottle color 10YR 3/6 depth of sample 10" Soil type: (sand, clay, etc.) Sandy Loam • Gleyed? No Other indicators None • Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration 14" Approximate % organic content(by volume) 0% Consistency Non-plastic, Non-sticky Hydric soils? Yes Basis Chroma 2 with mottles • HYDROLOGY • • Inundated? No Depth of standing water 0 Saturated soils? No Depth to saturated soils 0 Hydrologic indicators?Wetland drainage patterns • Describe obvious topographic features, if any: On bench above low flow in channel Wetland hydrology? Yes Basis Presumed on the basis of vegetation, soil and topography. • Normal Circumstances? Yes Atypical situation? No Wetland determination Yes Basis Meets Three Wetland Criteria Comments: There is one foot of water in the channel discharging from a sixty inch diameter culvert. • • October 22, 1992 T-1412-01 Page 1 of 7 SHANNON F&WILSON.INC. MODIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROACH • WETLAND "A" Site Van Worden Tract Date 9-9-92 Staff TRH/AMY Plot#2 VEGETATION Trees Status % Cover Herbs Status % Cover • Willow Species FACW 50* ♦ Reed Canarygrass FACW 40* • • Black Cottonwood FAC 10 Shrubs Status % Cover ♦ Himalayan Blackberry FACU 5 • Douglas Spiraea FACW 5 • Bittersweet Nightshade FAC Trace • * dominant species % of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 100% % cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: 105% Hydrophytic vegetation? Yes SOILS Series/Phase Puyallup On hydric soils list? No I y A horizon: depth 0-5" matrix color 10YR 4/3 Dry mottle color None depth of sample 4" Soil type: (sand, clay, etc.) Silt Loam B horizon: depth 5-18" matrix color 2.5Y 5/2 mottle color 7.5YR 3/3 depth of sample 8" matrix color 2.5Y 6/2 mottle color 7.5YR 3/4 depth of sample 10" Soil type: (sand, clay, etc.) Silt Loam Gleyed? No Other indicators None Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration 5" • Approximate % organic content(by volume) 0% Consistency Slightly plastic, Non-sticky Hydric soils? Yes Basis Chroma 2 with mottles • • HYDROLOGY Inundated? No Depth of standing water 0 Saturated soils? No Depth to saturated soils 0 Hydrologic indicators?Wetland drainage patterns • Describe obvious topographic features, if any: Drainage swale, hvdric soil. Wetland hydrology? Yes Basis Presumed based on indicators. • Normal Circumstances? Yes Atypical situation? No Wetland determination Yes Basis Meets Three Wetland Criteria Comments: October 22, 1992 T-1412-01 Page 2 of 7 • SHANNON&WILSON,INC. MODIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROACH • EAST UPLAND FIELD Site Van Worden Tract Date 7-10-92 Staff TRH Plot# 3 VEGETATION Trees Status % Cover Herbs Status % Cover • None Observed ♦ Orchard Grass FACU 30* • Common Velvetgrass FAC 10 ♦ Tall Fescue FACU 40* • ♦ Quack Grass FACU 10 Shrubs Status % Cover • ♦ Black Cottonwood FAC 5 • • Canada Goldenrod FACU 5 *dominant species % of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 0% % cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: 15% Hydrophytic vegetation? No SOILS } Series/Phase- Fill On hydric soils list? No A horizon: depth 0-18" matrix color 5Y 4/3 mottle.color None .depth of sample 10" Soil type: (sand, clay, etc.) .Gravelly Sandy Loam B horizon: depth , matrix color mottle color depth of sample Soil type: (sand, clay, etc.) • Gleyed? No Other indicators None Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration 16" • Approximate % organic content(by volume) 0% Consistency Non-plastic, Non-sticky Hydric soils? No Basis Chroma 3 soil HYDROLOGY Inundated? No , Depth of standing water 0 Saturated soils? No ,. Depth to saturated,soils 0 • Hydrologic indicators?None observed Describe obvious topographic features, if any: Flat. . Wetland hydrology? No Basis No saturated soil, inundation, or other indicators. Normal Circumstances? Yes Atypical situation? No Wetland determination No Basis Lacking Three Wetland Criteria Comments: October 22, 1992 T-1412-01 Page 3 of 7 • SHANNON WILSON,INC. MODIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROACH NORTH OF WETLAND "B" • Site Van Worden Tract Date 9-9-92 Staff TRH/AMY Plot#4 VEGETATION Trees Status % Cover Herbs Status % Cover • None Observed • Reed Canarygrass FACW 70* • Canada Thistle FACU Trace • Watson's Willow Herb FACW Trace Shrubs Status % Cover • • Black Cottonwood FAC 15 • Canada Thistle FACU 5 • Willow Species FACW 5 • Himalayan Blackberry FACU Trace • Common Cattail • OBL Trace • Japanese Knotweed NI Trace • *dominant species % of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 100% % cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: 95% Hydrophytic vegetation? Yes SOILS Series/Phase Puyallup On hydric soils list? No `' A horizon:. depth _ � matrix color mottle color depth of sample �. Soil type: (sand, clay, etc.) B horizon: depth 0-18" matrix color 2.5Y 4/3 mottle color None depth of sample 10" Soil type: (sand, clay, etc.) Fine Sandy Loam Gleyed? No Other indicators None Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration 12" Approximate % organic content(by volume) 0% Consistency Non-plastic, Non-sticky Hy'dric soils? No Basis Chroma 3 soil, no mottles or other indicators. HYDROLOGY • Inundated? No Depth of standing water 0 Saturated soils? No Depth to saturated soils 0 Hydrologic indicators? None observed Describe obvious topographic features, if any: Flat. Wetland hydrology? No Basis No saturated soil, inundation,or other indicators. Normal Circumstances? Yes Atypical situation? No • Wetland determination No Basis Lacking Three Wetland Criteria Comments: Standing water about 20 feet south near culvert. Gage station indicates that the water level elevation = 7 feet. Water has a sewage smell. October 22, 1992 T-1412-01 Page 4 of 7 SHANNON EIWILSON,INC. MODIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROACH • NORTHWEST UPLAND FIELD • Site I Van Worden Tract Date 7-10-92 Staff TRH Plot#5 VEGETATION Trees Status % Cover Herbs Status % Cover ♦ None Observed • Orchard Grass FACU 40* ♦ Redtop Bentgrass FAC 10 • Tall Fescue FACU 40* • Quack Grass FACU 10 • Shrubs Status % Cover • Canada Thistle FACU 10 • * do ninant species % of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 0% % cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: 10% Hydrophytic vegetation? No SOILS Seris/Phase Puyallup On hydric soils list? No •r? A horizon:: depth 0-18" matrix color 10YR 3/2' mottle color`None " depth of sample 10" Soil)type: (sand, clay, etc.) -Sandy Loam �y f B.horizon: .. depth - . matrix color mottle color depth of sample - Sod type: (sand; clay; etc:)... Gleyed? No Other indicators None Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration 14" Approximate % organic content(by volume) 0% Consistency Non-plastic, Non-sticky Hydric soils? No Basis Chroma 2 soil, no mottles. HYDROLOGY Inundated? No . Depth of standing water 0 Saturated soils? No Depth to saturated soils 0 Hydrologic indicators?None observed • Describe obvious topographic features, if any: High flat area. Wetland hydrology? No Basis No saturated soil, inundation, or other indicators. • Normal Circumstances? Yes Atypical situation? No Wetland determination No .Basis Lacking Three Wetland Criteria Comments: October 22, 19 92 T-1412-01 • Page 5 of 7 SHANNON&WILSON,INC. MODIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROACH WETLAND "B" Site Van Worden Tract Date 7-10-92 Staff TRH Plot#6 VEGETATION • TreesI Status % Cover Herbs Status % Cover ♦ Nine Observed ♦ Reed Canarygrass FAC 95* ♦ Soft Rush FACW Trace Shrubs Status % Cover • • None Observed *dominant species • % offdominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 100% % cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: 95% Hydrophytic vegetation? Yes • SOILS • Series/Phase Woodinville On hydric soils list? Yes 1'1.: A horizon: depth 0-18" matrix color 5Y 5/1 mottle color 5YR 3/3 depth of sample 10" f„s• Soil type: (sand, clay,etc.) Silt Loam B horizon: depth matrix color mottle color_ depth of sample Soil type: (sand, clay, etc.) • Gleyed? No Other indicators None • Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration 14" Approximate % organic content(by volume) <50% Consistency Plastic, Non-sticky .. Hydric soils? Yes Basis Chroma 1 soil. HYDROLOGY • Inundated? No Depth of standing water 0 Saturated soils? Yes Depth to saturated soils 8" Hydrologic indicators?Wetland Drainage Pattern. • Describe obvious topographic features, if any: Large low depression. Wetland hydrology? Yes Basis Saturated soil. Normal Circumstances? Yes Atypical situation? No • Wetland determination No Basis Meets Three Wetland Criteria Comments: • October 22, 1992 T-1412-01 Page6of7 SHANNON&WILSON,INC. • MODIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROACH WETLAND "B" Site Van Worden Tract Date 9-9-92 Staff TRH/AMY Plot#7 VEGETATION Trees Status % Cover Herbs Status % Cover ♦ None Observed ♦ Common Duckweed OBL 5 ♦ Lyngby's Sedge OBL 20 Shrubs Status % Cover • Common Cattail OBL 50* • * dominant species % of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 100% % cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: 75% Hydrophytic vegetation? Yes SOILS Soil was not sampled. Soil was assumed hydric based on inundation. Series/Phase On hydric soils list? !; A horizon: depth matrix color ' mottle color depth of sample Soil type: (sand, clay, etc.) B horizon: depth matrix color mottle color depth of sample Soil type: (sand, clay, etc.) Gleyed? Other indicators Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration Approximate % organic content(by volume) ; Consistency Hydric soils? Yes Basis Inundation. • HYDROLOGY • • Inundated? Yes Depth of standing water 2' • Saturated soils? — Depth to saturated soils — Hydrologic indicators?Wetland Drainage Pattern. Describe obvious topographic features, if any: Ditch Wetland hydrology? Yes Basis Inundation. ' • • Normal Circumstances? Yes Atypical situation? No • Wetland determination No Basis Meets Three Wetland Criteria Comments: T1412-01.TB1lT1412-Ikd/lkd October 22, 1992 T-1412-01 Page 7 of 7 SHANNON&WILSON,INC. • • • APPENDIX F • MODIFIED REPPERT WETLAND VALUES EVALUATION SHEETS f.fA • • T-1412-01 SHANNON 6WILSON.INC. APPENDIX F MODIFIED REPPERT WETLAND VALUES EVALUATION VAN WOERDEN TRACT: WETLAND "A" Value Rating Basis for Evaluation 1. Natural Biological Function HIGH TO MODERATE A. Food Chain Support Moderate 1. Net Primary Production High Wetland contains marsh vegetation. 2. Mode of Transport Moderate Linked to Springbrook Creek. 3. Food Chain Support Moderate Songbird use. B. General Habitat High diverse wetland with three plant com- munities. • C. Special Habitat High Snags, banks with cover. 2. Aquatic Study Areas, MODERATE Sanctuaries, or Refuges Heron Rookery and Natural Shoreline Master Plan Designation one mile north. ' 3. Hydrologic Support Function HIGH to MODERATE A. Hydrologic Periodicity.;, . . Moderate Linked to Springbrook Creek. B. Elevation in basin High Near open water system, Springbrook Creek. • 4. Shorelines Protection LOW Narrow corridor approximately 200 feet wide along the creek. 5. Storage of storm and MODERATE flood water • A. Flood Storage Factor Low Wetland less than five acres in size. B. Flood Retardation Factor . High Greater than 30% of wetland vegetation is woody. • T-1412-01 • F-1 SHANNON&WILSON,INC. • APPENDIX F • MODIFIED REPPERT WETLAND VALUES EVALUATION (continued) VAN WOERDEN TRACT: WETLAND "A" Value Rating Basis for Evaluation • 6. Natural Groundwater MODERATE Recharge Wetland is a seasonal system between 5 and 10 acres in size. 7. Water Purification HIGH A. Wetland Type High • 1. Hydroperiod High Wetland is near Springbrook Creek. 2. Vegetation Density High Wetland plant cover is greater than 80%. B. Areal and Waste Loading Moderate Relationships 1. Total Wetland Moderate Total wetland system appears to be greater than ten acres in size. 2. Proportion of Water Low Less than 40% of wetland is normally , covered with water. f= 3. Proportion of Runoff High More than 50% of surface water runoff is retained in wetland for no more than a 2 year event. C. Location Factors' High 1. Frost-Free.Days High Over 250 frost-free days/year. 2. Location related to High Discharge from surrounding area has very high total fecal conform levels, as high as 16,000 organisms per liter. 8. Cultural Values (Economics, HIGH Locally used for recreation and may Aesthetics=.Recreational,.. have aesthetic value as a greenbelt to the Archeological Sites) local office building employees. • • T-1412-01 F-2 , SHANNON&WILSON,INC. APPENDIX F MODIFIED REPPERT WETLAND VALUES EVALUATION VAN WOERDEN TRACT: WETLAND "B" Value Rating Basis for Evaluation 1. Natural Biological Function MODERATE A. Food Chain Support Moderate 1. Net Primary Production High Wetland contains marsh vegetation. 2. Mode of Transport Moderate Linked to Springbrook Creek. 3. Food Chain Support Moderate Moderate diversity of vertebrate animals. B. General Habitat Moderate At least emergent and scrub-shrub communities. C. Special Habitat High Snags, banks with cover. 2. Aquatic Study Areas, MODERATE Sanctuaries, Heron Rookery and Natural Shoreline or Refuges Master Plan Designation one mile north. 3. Hydrologic Support Function . HIGH to MODERATE. A. Hydrologic Periodicity Moderate Linked to Springbrook Creek. B. Elevation in basin High Near open water system, Springbrook Creek. 4. Shoreline Protection MODERATE Shoreline vegetation is between 100 and 200 yards wide. 5. Storage of storm and MODERATE flood water A. Flood Storage Factor Moderate Wetland is between five and ten acres in size. B. Flood Retardation Factor. Moderate Between 10% and 30% of wetland vegetation is woody. T-1412-01 F-3 SHANNON&WILSON,INC. • APPENDIX F MODIFIED REPPERT WETLAND VALUES EVALUATION (continued) VAN WOERDEN TRACT: WETLAND "B" Value Rating Basis for Evaluation 6. Natural Groundwater HIGH Recharge Total wetland is greater than 10 acres in size, and has an open water compo- nent. 7. Water Purification HIGH A. Wetland Type High 1. Hydroperiod High Wetland is near a river, Springbrook Creek. 2. Vegetation Density High Wetland plant cover is greater than 80%. B. .Areal and Waste Loading Low Relationships • 1. Total Wetland Moderate Total wetland system appears to be .> between ten and 100 acres in size. 2. Proportion of Water Low Less than 40% of wetland is normally covered with water. 3. Proportion of Runoff High More than 50% of surface water runoff is retained in wetland for no more than a 2 year event. C. Location Factors High 1. Frost-Free Days High Over 250 frost-free days/year. 2. Location related to High Discharge from surrounding area has very high total fecal coliform levels, as high as 16,000 organisms per liter. • • 8. Cultural Values (Economics, HIGH Cultural and aesthetic values in todays Aesthetics% Recreational, society. Archeological Sites) T-1412-01 F-4 i ' SHANNON WILSON,INC. APPENDIX F • MODIFIED REPPERT WETLAND VALUES EVALUATION VAN WOERDEN TRACT: WETLAND "C" Value Rating Basis for Evaluation 1. Natural Biological Function MODERATE A. Food Chain Support Moderate 1. Net Primary Production Moderate Dominantly scrub-shrub vegetation. • 2. Mode of Transport High Linked to Springbrook Creek. 3. Food Chain Support Moderate Songbird and possible fish use. B. General Habitat Moderate At least emergent and scrub-shrub communities. C. Special Habitat High Bands with cover, downed logs. 2. Aquatic Study Areas, MODERATE Sanctuaries, or Refuges Heron Rookery and Natural Shoreline Master Plan Designation one mile k, north. 3. ' Hydrologic Support Function HIGH to MODERATE A. Hydrologic Periodicity Moderate Linked to Springbrook Creek. B. Elevation in basin High Near open water system, Springbrook Creek. 4. Shoreline Protection LOW Narrow corridor, approximately 200 feet wide along the creek shore. • 5. Storage of storm and MODERATE flood water • A. Flood Storage Factor. Low Wetland less than five acres in size. B. Flood Retardation Factor Moderate Between 10% and 30% of wetland vegetation is woody near base of wet- land. • • T-1412-01 F-5 A" SHANNON 6WILSON,INC. APPENDIX F MODIFIED REPPERT WETLAND VALUES EVALUATION (continued) VAN WOERDEN TRACT: WETLAND "C" Value Rating Basis for Evaluation 6. Natural Groundwater MODERATE Recharge Small area. Water flowing year round. Soil is silty sand. 7. Water Purification MODERATE A. Wetland Type High to Moderate 1. Hydroperiod Moderate Permanent water system flooded by • large and small storm events. 2. Vegetation Density High Wetland plant cover is greater than 80%. B. Areal and Waste Loading Low Relationships • 1. Total Wetland Low Total wetland system appears to be less than ten acres in size. 2. Proportion of Water Low Less.than.40% of wetland is normally covered with water, r. 3. Proportion of Runoff Low Less than 25 of surface water runoff is retained in wetland for no more than a z., 2 year event. C. Location Factors High 1. Frost-Free Days High Over 250 frost-free days/year. 2. Location related to High Discharge from surrounding area has very high total fecal coliform levels, as • high as 16,000 organisms per liter. 8. Cultural Values (Economics, MODERATE The area is locally used for recreation. Aesthetics% Recreational, Archeological Sites) T-1412-01 F-6 66 oU !5, S6, �--� DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON FEB 2 01996 RECE1VFD GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION FACILITY RAYMOND AVENUE SOUTHWEST AND SOUTHWEST 19TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON E-6754 April 14, 1995 • PREPARED FOR WINMAR PROPERTIES o uglas_ . Lynne - • . . Staff Engineer := Vt.�CA/11/ 4- ��oF iede cC` . .. : Kyle R. Camp:ell E. fig Manager of Geotec is I Se Yes; . SAL t1� tEXPIRES i • Earth Consultants, Inc. 1805 - 136th Place Northeast, Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 (206) 643-3780 IMPORTANT INFORMATION .., '' ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT More construction problems are caused by site subsur- technical engineers who then render an opinion about face conditions than any other factor. As troublesome as overall subsurface conditions,•their likely reaction to subsurface problems can be,their frequency and extent proposed construction activity,and appropriate founda- have been lessened considerably in recent years,due in tion design. Even under optimal circumstances actual large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/ conditions may differ from those inferred to exist, The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how the Geosciences. qualified, and no subsurface exploration program, no • matter how comprehensive, can reveal what is hidden by : The following suggestions and observations are offered to help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays, earth, rock and time.The actual interface between mate- cost-overruns and other costly headaches that can rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report indicates.Actual conditions in areas not sampled may occur during a construction project. differ from predictions. Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated, but steps can be taken to help minimize their A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING impact. For this reason, most experienced owners retain their REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET geotechnical consultants through the construction stage, to iden- tify variances,conduct additional tests which may be . OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS needed,and to recommend solutions to problems A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsur • - encountered on site. face exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique • SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS set of project-specific factors.These typically include: the general nature of the structure involved, its size and CAN CHANGE configuration; the location of the structure on the site and its orientation; physical concomitants such as Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly- access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities, changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engi- • and the level of additional risk which the client assumed neering report is based on conditions which existed at by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory the time of subsurface exploration,construction decisions program.To help avoid costly problems, consult the should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors adequacy may have been affected by time. Speak with the geo which change subsequent to the date of the report may technical consultant to learn if additional tests are 1 affect its recommendations. advisable before construction starts. 14.4 Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and • • otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not natural events such as floods,earthquakes or ground- be used: water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions •When the nature of the proposed structure is and,thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical . changed, for example, if an office building will be report.The geotechnical engineer should be kept • • erected instead of a parking garage, or if a refriger- apprised of any such events,and should be consulted to ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre- determine if additional tests are necessary. frigerated one; •when the size or configuration of the proposed GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE structure is altered; PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES •when the location or orientation of the proposed AND PERSONS structure is modified; • •when there is a change of ownership.or Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet •for application to an adjacent site. the specific needs of specific individuals. A report pre- . Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade • - which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid- quate for a construction contractor,or even some other • ered in their report's development have changed. consulting civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise, this report was prepared expressly for the client involved and expressly for purposes indicated by the client. Use MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS" by any other persons for any purpose,or by the dient ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES for a different purpose, may result in problems. No indi- vidual other than the client should apply this report for its Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical • only at those points where samples are taken,when engineer. No person should apply this report for any purpose they are taken. Data derived through sampling and sub- other than that originally contemplated without first conferring sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo- with the geotechnical engineer. fiti I �E�� 44\ Earth Consultants Inc. fll�� ` `, Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists • April 14, 1995 E-6754 Winmar Properties .• c/o Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. • 10801 Main Street, Suite 100 • Bellevue, Washington 98004 • • Attention: Mr. Mark Miller Dear Mr. Miller: We are pleased to submit our report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Distribution Facility, Raymond Avenue Southwest and Southwest 19th Street, Renton, Washington." This report presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratory tests, and engineering analysis, as well as geotechnically related recommendations for the proposed site development. The purpose and scope of our study was outlined in our proposal dated February 2, 1995. >= • Based on the subsurface conditions enco.untered.at.the above referenced site, it is our opinion that the proposed additions may be supported by shallow spread footings bearing on a minimum of two feet of structural fill after completion of a surcharge program or a preload program, depending on the magnitude of post-construction settlement that can be tolerated. • If you or your consultants have any questions about the content of this report, or if • we can be of further assistance, please call. • Respectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. • Kyle R. Campbell, P.E. : . Manager of Geotechnical Services • DSL/KRC/kml [6754GES.Rpt] • • • 1805.136th Place N.E., Suite 201, Bellevue,Washington 98005 Bellevue(206)643-3780 Seattle(206)464-1584 FAX(206)746-0860 Tacoma(206)272-6608 TABLE OF CONTENTS E-6754 PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Project Description 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 Surface 2 Subsurface 2 Groundwater 3 Laboratory Testing 3 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 General 3 Site Preparation and Grading 4 Surcharge Program 6 Foundations 8 Seismic Design Considerations 9 Lateral Resistance 10 Retaining Walls 10 Slab-on-Grade Floors 11 Excavations and Slopes 11 Site Drainage 12 Utility Support and Backfill 13 Pavement Areas 13 LIMITATIONS 14 Additional Services 14 APPENDICES Appendix A Field Exploration Appendix B Laboratory Testing ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Boring Location Plan Plate 3 Settlement Plate Detail Plate 4 Typical Footing Subdrain Detail Plate 5 Utility Trench Fill Plate Al Legend Plates A2 through A10 Boring Logs Plate B1 Grain Size Analysis Plate B2 Atterberg Limit Test Data GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION FACILITY RAYMOND AVENUE SOUTHWEST AND SOUTHWEST 19TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON E-6754 INTRODUCTION General This report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study for the proposed distribution facility near the intersection of Raymond Avenue Southwest and Southwest 19th Street, Renton, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1 . The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site and, based on the conditions encountered,to provide recommendations for site preparation, as well as present geotechnical information for the proposed site development. • • Project Description At the time our study was performed, the site, the proposed structure, and exploratory locations were approximately as shown on the Boring Location Plan, Plate 2. Based on information provided by. Lance Mueller and:: Associates, it is proposed to C develop the parcel with a concrete tilt-up office/warehouse. We understand that fills up to about two to three feet in depth are anticipated to provide grade for the building Lia slab. Based on our experience with similar structures in the past, we anticipate P �xs structural loading to be in the following ranges: • Wall footings - 2 to 3 kips per lineal foot • Maximum column load - 50 to 100 kips • • Slab loads - 250 pounds per square foot (psf) If the above design criteria are incorrect or change, we should be notified and allowed to review our recommendations in light of actual design information. In any case, it is recommended that Earth Consultants, Inc. be retained to perform a general review of the final construction design. • Earth Consukants, Inc. I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Winmar Properties c/o Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. E-6754 April 14, 1995 Page 2 SITE CONDITIONS Surface The site of the proposed facility is located southwest of the Raymond Avenue and Southwest 19th Street intersection in Renton,Washington (see Plate 1, Vicinity Map). The rectangular parcel covers about twenty-four acres; however, the proposed development is located in the portion of the site between Spring Brook Creek and the east property line. The development area is bounded by Spring Brook.Creek on the south and west, by the Southwest 19th Street right-of-way to the north and by the Raymond Avenue Southwest right-of-way to the east. At present, the site is undeveloped, with grasses covering the existing surface. The site is generally level with elevational changes of about two feet. Subsurface The site was explored by drilling five borings at the.approximate locations shown on Plate 2. Detailed descriptions of the conditions encountered at each location explored are presented on the Boring Logs, Plates A2 through A10. A description of the field exploration methods is included in Appendix A. Below is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. During our subsurface exploration, a three to six foot thick layer of fill was observed across the site. The fill consisted of sandy lean clay and silty sand (Unified Soil • Classification CL and SM). Immediately underlying the fill, our exploration encountered gray silt/lean clay (ML/CL) to depths ranging from fifteen to twenty feet beneath the existing grades. Between depths of about nine and fifteen feet, the silt/lean clay was mixed with peat. In Boring B-3, a distinct layer of peat was observed between ten and one-half (10.5) feet and thirteen and one-half (13.5) feet. The peat layer was also observed in Boring B-4 between eleven and one-half (11 .5) feet and thirteen and one-half (13.5) feet. Moisture contents of the peaty soil ranged from 43.5 to 105.0 percent. Underlying the silt/lean clay, layers of poorly graded with silt (SP-SM), sandysilt (ML) and siltysand (SM) were observed to the sand t maximum exploration depth of thirty-five (35) feet. Earth Consultants, Inc. . `GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Winmar Properties • c/o Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. E-6754 • April 14, 1995 Page 3 • • Groundwater Groundwater was observed in all of the borings except B-5 at depths ranging ,from four to eight feet below the existing ground surface. Groundwater was not encountered until borings were advanced to a depth of about eight feet, at which point the water surface rose to four feet beneath the ground surface. It is important to note that groundwater seepage is not constant; thus, one may expect fluctuations in the volume and location depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, groundwater seepage is greater during the • wetter winter months (typically October through May). Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or modify the field soil classification of the units encountered and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering characteristics of the soils encountered. Visual classifications were supplemented by index tests, such as sieve analysis and Atterberg Limits, and moisture content tests on representative samples. The results of laboratory. ` ° tests perform d on specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual boring log or on a separate data sheet contained in Appendix B. However, it is important to note that these test results may not =' accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions; our geotechnical recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results. The soil samples for this project will be discarded after a period of fifteen (15) days following completion of this report, unless we are otherwise directed in writing. • • • DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General • Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion that the site can be developed generally as planned provided the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into the final design. In our opinion, total settlement of the existing fill and underlying fluvial soils is anticipated to be on the order of two to five inches from application of new structural fill and building loads. In order to reduce the anticipated settlements to about one inch, a surcharge post-constructionram is ro 9 program recommended. Earth Consultants, Inc. 'GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY • Winmar Properties c/o Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. E-6754 April 14, 1995 Page 4 • The recommended surcharge program would involve placement of at least two feet of fill above the finish floor elevation and allowing the induced settlements to stabilize. As an alternative to a surcharge program, a preload program could be used; however, the anticipated post-construction settlements would be in the range of two inches (total settlement) and one to one and one-half inches (differential settlement). A preload program would consist of placing structural fill to the finish floor elevation and allowing the induced settlements to stabilize. We anticipate stabilization of settlement within four to six weeks after placement of the surcharge or preload fill is complete. If the preload option is chosen, the induced settlements must be monitored in accordance with the recommendations concerning settlement monitoring in the • Surcharge Program section of this study. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area for the exclusive use of Winmar Properties and their representatives. No warranty is expressed or implied. It is recommended that this report, in its entirety, be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. Fh Site Preparation and Grading The building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, organic material and any other deleterious material. The root mat of the existing vegetation can be left in place in fill areas provided a minimum of two feet and one and .one-half feet of structural fill underlie foundations and pavements, respectively. The vegetation will have to be cut, with grasses left in place in areas to receive fill. Shrubs will have to be removed from the site. Based on conditions encountered at our exploration locations, which indicated minimal topsoil, we anticipate stripping.will be limited to removal of vegetation and one to two inches of soil. Stripped materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. Stripped materials may be used in non-load supporting areas such . as landscaping. • Following the stripping and clearing procedures, the earthwork operations can commence to provide the design grades. The ground surface where structural fill is to be placed should be proofrolled. All proofrolling should be performed under the observation of a representative of ECI. Soil in any loose or soft areas, if recompacted and still excessively yielding, should be overexcavated and replaced with structural fill to a depth that will provide a stable base beneath the general structural fill or suitable support for slabs. Earth Consultants, Inc. ‘GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Winmar Properties c/o Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. E-6754 April 14, 1995 Page 5 The soils observed in our borings are moisture sensitive due to their high fines content. As such, in an exposed condition they will become disturbed from normal construction activity especially when in a wet or saturated condition. Once disturbed, in a wet condition, they will be unsuitable for support of foundations or pavements. Therefore, during construction where these soils are exposed and will support new structures, care must be exercised not to disturb their condition. If disturbed conditions develop, the affected soils must be removed and replaced with a structural fill. The depth of removal will be dependent on the level of disturbance developed during construction. Structural fill is defined as any compacted fill placed under foundations, roadways, slabs, pavements, or any other load-bearing areas. Structural fill under foundations should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum 90 percent of its maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near the optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks should also beplaced in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90percent of maximum P density, except for the top twelve (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 k'•.,; percent of maximum density. r.. Soils expected to be exposed in the footing and utility excavations are silty sand, lean clay, silt and peat. In our opinion, the inorganic soil is usable as structural fill, provided it is moisture conditioned to at or near optimum moisture content. In order to moisture condition the soil, it may be necessary to either add water or aerate the • soil. However, the peat, which may be exposed in deep utility trenches, should be removed and replaced with structural fill to a depth that-will provide adequate support • for the utility. Structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a granular material with a maximum size of three inches and no more than five percent fines • passing the No. 200 sieve, based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction. During dry weather, most compactible non-organic soil can be used as structural fill. It is recommended that any structural fill planned for on site use be submitted for approval prior to import. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Winmar Properties c/o Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. E-6754 April 14, 1995 Page 6 Due to the loose/soft condition and moisture sensitivity of the surface soils at the site, in our opinion, it would be prudent to construct a temporary access road around the building that will be useable by construction equipment during wet weather. The road should be constructed during mass grading operations. The temporary access road should consist of eighteen (18) inches of free-draining granular structural fill underlain by a geotextile fabric suitable for use in stabilization applications. As an alternative, six inches of four-inch to six-inch quarry spalls can be used i lieu of the geotextile fabric. Surcharge Program The surcharge program is designed to pre-consolidate the compressible fills and soil underlying the site, such that the surcharge would apply loads equivalent to, or greater than, anticipated building loads. The surcharge fill is in addition to the fill required to bring the site to grade. The surcharge should extend at least five feet beyond the perimeter of the buildings. If the preload option is used as described in f the General section of this study, the preload fill should also extend at least five feet beyond the perimeter of the building. The height of the surcharge should be two feet above finish floor. The side slopes of the fill should not be inclined any steeper than 1 H:1 V. If a wet weather construction schedule is planned, the surcharge fill should meet the requirements of a wet weather fill as discussed in the Site Preparation and : Grading section of this study. The surcharge material should have a minimum in-place unit weight of one hundred twenty (120) pcf. Depending on the material used as surcharge, it may be necessary to compact the surcharge. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to overexcavate soil to provide the required thickness of structural fill below footings and slabs prior to placement of the surcharge. Alternatively, footing overexcavations can be accomplished after removal of the surcharge. We.anticipate the settlement induced by the surcharge should range from two to five inches. A smaller settlement should be interpreted as that the soils have been preconsolidated and soil conditions are better than anticipated. Conversely, a larger settlement could be interpreted that the soil conditions are worse than anticipated, and that additional time and measurements should be taken to obtain satisfactory results. However, the only reasonably accurate means of verifying the settlement magnitude is to perform a monitoring program. Based on the conditions encountered, we anticipate completion of the surcharge program in approximately four to six weeks. Earth Consultants. Inc. ''GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Winmar Properties c/o Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. E-6754 April 14, 1995 Page 7 it The settlement monitoring program should include setting settlement monitors on the existing site subgrade before any fill is placed, monitoring them through completion of fill placement, continuing until settlements cease or until anticipated future settlements are considered to be less than one inch. More specific details of this program are presented below: • Settlement markers should be placed on the native subgrade of each building pad before any fill is placed. Seven to nine markers should be installed within the building footprint. ECI can supply and install these markers. (A typical detail is provided on Plate 3). • A baseline reading is obtained on each marker and is referenced to a temporary • benchmark located on a feature that will not be affected by the fill-induced settlements. • The fills are then placed. Settlement readings are taken at relatively short r; intervals during this process, since this phase generates relatively large and rapid settlement. " • operation is complete, readings are obtained on aperiodic basis, Once the fill o erat o 9 P P typically weekly, until the settlement ceases or the anticipated future settlements are judged by the geotechnical engineer to be less than approximately one inch. • Each set of settlement readings are plotted graphically against time to determine the magnitude and rate of settlement, and are matched against the predicted magnitudes and rates to verify the accuracy of earlier estimates and to make any appropriate modifications. ECI should be retained to acquire the settlement readings. If you prefer to use another organization to collect these readings, measurements should be provided to us as quickly after their acquisition as possible for plotting and interpretation. This will help avoid any misinterpretation or misunderstanding regarding the success of the surcharge program. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Winmar Properties c/o Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. E-6754 April 14, 1995 Page 8 The settlement markers must be kept intact during earthwork operations. In our experience, earthwork equipment(dozers, rollers,trucks, etc.) often demolish markers at a very high rate. This adds to the project costs in that they need to be replaced and it makes the information obtained less reliable. To avoid this scenario, it is suggested that the project specifications include a requirement that the earthwork contractor is required to immediately replace any damaged settlement marker and have the settlement readings reobtained at his own cost. This requirement makes the earthwork contractor more conscious of the importance of the preload program and • will aid in maintaining the integrity of the monitoring program. Fill for landscaping purposes should not be placed near the building since additional fill could induce further settlements after the building is constructed. If such fill is planned, the surcharge should be extended to five feet beyond the planned landscape fill, or a lightweight fill, such as "hog fuel" be used. Foundations Y. I �'3 Based on. the encountered subsurface soil conditions, preliminary addition design criteria, and assuming compliance 'with the preceding Site Preparation and Grading section, the proposed structures may be supported by a minimum of two feet of new structural fill after completion of a surcharge program or a preload program, as described earlier. The foundation may be designed for an allowable soil bearing capacity of two thousand five hundred (2500) pounds per square foot (psf). Footings should be at least twelve (12) inches in width and extend to a depth of at least eighteen (18) inches below the lowest adjacent grade. The above allowable soil bearing value is for dead plus live loads and may be • increased one-third for combined dead; live, wind, and seismic forces. It is recommended that all footing excavations be observed by a representative of ECI, prior to placing forms or rebar,to verify that exposed soil conditions are as anticipated in this report, and/or provide suitable modifications in the design, as required. • Without completion of the surcharge or preload programs, we estimate there is the potential for two to five inches of total settlement with two to three inches of differential settlement. Following successful completion of the surcharge program, total settlements are expected to be less than one inch for foundations bearing on structural fill. Differential settlement is anticipated to be about one-half to three-quarters of an inch. Total settlement of about two inches and differential settlement of about one to one and one-half inches should be anticipated if the preload program is used. The majority of the anticipated settlement should occur during construction as the dead loads are applied. . Earth Coneultanta, Inc. , GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Winmar Properties c/o Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. E-6754 April 14, 1995 Page 9 Seismic Design Considerations The Puget Sound region is classified as Seismic Zone 3 by the Uniform Building Code (UBC). The largest earthquakes in the Puget Sound region have been subcrustal events, ranging in depth from 30 to 55 miles. Such deep events have exhibited no surface faulting. The UBC earthquake regulations contain a static force procedure and a dynamic force procedure for design base shear calculations. Based on the encountered soil conditions, it is our opinion that a site coefficient of 1 .5 should be used for the static force procedure, as outlined in Section 2334 of the 1991 UBC. For the dynamic force procedure outline in Section 2335 of the 1991 UBC, the curve for Soft to Medium Clays and Sands (Soil Type 3) should be used on Figure 23-3, Normalized Response Spectra Shapes. Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods �r of time during an earthquake. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or. differential settlement for structures with foundations founded in the liquefying soils. Y Groundshaking,of. sufficient duration results in the loss of grain to grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave as a fluid for short periods of time. To have potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with • a grain size distribution of a specified range (generally sands and silt); it must be loose to medium-dense; it must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of groundshaking. Based on laboratory testing,the majority of the loose/soft soils encountered during our field exploration consist of fine-grained silt and clay, which have a lower susceptibility to liquefaction than sands. Given this information, it is our opinion that the potential for widespread liquefaction over the site during a seismic event is low. Isolated areas may be subject to liquefaction, however, the effect on structures is anticipated to be minimal if the recommendations contained in this report are followed. We estimate liquefaction induced settlement would be in the range of the estimated post construction settlements discussed earlier. . • Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Winmar Properties c/o Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. E-6754 April 14, 1995 Page 10 • Lateral Resistance • An allowable passive pressure value against the sides of foundation slabs or other subsurface foundation elements of three hundred (300) psf per foot of depth may be used for design. In order to fully mobilize the passive pressure, the foundations must be poured "neat" against the adjacent soil or the foundation excavation must be backfilled with structural fill. Friction between the base of foundations and the underlying soil may be assumed to be 40 percent of the dead load. The friction and passive pressure design values include a factor of safety of 1 .5. Retaining Walls • Retaining walls and foundation walls that will act as retaining walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the retained soils. Walls that are designed to yield can be designed to resist the lateral earth pressure imposed by an r•. equivalent fluid with a unit weight of thirty-five (35) pounds per cubic foot (pcf). The equivalent fluid weight should be increased to fifty (50) pcf for walls that are restrained at the top from free movement. These values are based on horizontal backfill and that surcharges due to backfill slopes, hydrostatic pressures, traffic, structural loads or other surcharge loads will not act on walls. If such surcharges are to apply, they should be added to the above design lateral pressures. Calculation of lateral resistance should be done using the passive pressure and coefficient of friction • values contained in the previous section. Retaining walls should be backfilled with a free-draining material conforming to the WSDOT specification for gravel backfill for walls (WSDOT 9-03.12(2)). The free-draining material should extend a minimum of eighteen inches behind the wall. The remainder of the backfill should consist of structural fill. A perforated drain pipe should be placed at the base of the wall. Drain pipes located in the free draining • backfill soil should be perforated with holes less than 1/2 inch in diameter. The drain pipe should be surrounded by a minimum of one cubic foot per lineal foot with 3/4 rock or should be wrapped with a filter fabric. Earth Consultants, Inc. l' 'GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Winmar Properties c/o Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. E-6754 April 14, 1995 Page 11 • • Slab-on-Grade Floors Slab-on-grade floors may be supported on a minimum of one foot of structural fill • suitable for use during wet weather conditions. Should loose soil be present at the slab subgrade elevation, it should be compacted to the requirements of structural fill. Any disturbed subgrade soil must either be re-compacted or replaced with structural fill. Slab-on-grade floors should be designed by the structural engineer based on the anticipated loading and the subgrade support characteristics. A modulus of vertical subgrade reaction of three hundred (300) pounds per cubic inch (pci) may be used for design. The slab should be provided with a minimum of four inches of free-draining sand or • gravel. In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, a vapor barrier such as a 6-mil • plastic membrane may be placed beneath the slab. Two inches of damp sand may be • placed over the membrane for protection during construction and to aid in curing of ! : the concrete. Excavations and Slopes In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state rr and federal safety regulations. As described in the current Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations, soils anticipated to be encountered in excavations (fill, silt and peat) would classify as Type "C." Therefore temporary cuts greater than four feet in height, should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than • 1 H:1 V in the Type "C" soils. If slopes of this inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, or if excavations greater than twenty (20) feet in depth are required, temporary shoring may be necessary. This shoring would help protect against slope or excavation collapse, and would provide protection to workmen in the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide shoring design criteria, if requested. • All permanent slopes should be inclined no greater than 2H:1V. If this inclination • cannot be maintained, this office should be contacted to review the design and construction criteria. We also recommend that all cut slopes be examined by Earth • Consultants, Inc. during excavation to verify that conditions are as anticipated: Supplementary recommendations can then be developed, if needed, to improve the stability, including flattening of slopes or installation of drainage. In any case, water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any slopes. • Earth ConauItanta, Inc. • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Winmar Properties c/o Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. E-6754 April 14, 1995 Page 12 • The above information has been provided solely as a service to our client Under no • circumstances should the above information be interpreted to mean that this office is • assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. • Site Drainage • • Groundwater was observed in all of the borings except B-5 at depths ranging from four to eight feet below the existing ground surface. Groundwater was not encountered until borings were advanced to a depth of about eight feet, at which point the water surface rose to four feet beneath the ground surface. It is possible that groundwater levels will present construction related problems while excavating • for the foundations or utility trenches. Should groundwater seepage be encountered during construction, the bottom of the excavation should be sloped to one or more shallow sump pits. The collected water can then be pumped from these pits to a permanent discharge, such as a nearby storm drain. Depending on the Positive and P magnitude of such.seepage, it=may'also be necessary to interconnect the sump pits °t6, by a system of connector trenches. It is recommended that the appropriate locations of subsurface drains, if needed, be established during grading operations by this at. office, at which time the seepage areas, if present, may be. more clearly defined. The site should be graded such that surface water is directed off the site. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where structures, slabs or driveways are to be constructed. During construction, loose surfaces should be sealed at night by compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils. • Final site grades should allow for drainage away from the structure foundations. _The ground should be sloped at a gradient of three percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the structures in landscape areas. Foundation drains should be installed where landscaped areas are immediately • adjacent to the building. In our opinion, foundation drains are not necessary in dock- high areas or where pavements extend to the building walls. The drains should be installed at or just below the bottom of the footing, with a gradient sufficient to initiate flow. A typical detail is provided on Plate 4. Earth Consultants, Inc. bEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY • Winmar Properties c/o Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. E-6754 April 14, 1995 Page 13 Utility Support and Backfill Based on the soil conditions encountered,the majority of soils expected to be exposed by utility excavations should provide adequate support for utilities; however, deeper utility trenches may encounter the peat that is beneath the existing fills. Should the peat, or soft soils, be exposed near pipe grades, the peat or soft soil should be replaced with structural fill to a depth that will provide adequate support for the utility. Utility trench backfill is a major concern in reducing the potential for settlement along utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped to ensure support is provided around the pipe haunches. Fill should be carefully placed and hand tamped to about twelve (12) inches above the crown of the pipe before any heavy compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench backfill should be placed in lifts having a loose thickness of less than twelve (12) inches. A typical trench backfill section and compaction requirements for load supporting and non-load supporting areas is presented on Plate 5. Pavement Areas The adequacy of site pavements is related in part to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To provide a properly prepared subgrade for pavements, we recommend the subgrade be treated and prepared as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report. This means at least the top twelve (12) inches of the subgrade should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density (per ASTM 1557-78). Due to surface conditions observed during the subsurface exploration, we recommend pavements be supported by a minimum of one foot of structural fill suitable for use in wet weather. Depending on actual conditions, thicker structural fill or a geotextile, such as Mirafi 600X, may be required to provide adequate support • for pavements. It is possible that some localized areas of soft, wet or unstable subgrade may still exist after this process. Therefore, a greater thickness of structural fill or crushed rock may be needed to stabilize these localized areas. We recommend the following pavement section for lightly loaded areas: • Two inches of Asphalt Concrete (AC) over four inches of Crushed Rock Base (CRB) material, or • Two inches of AC over three inches of Asphalt Treated Base (ATB) material. Earth Consultants, Inc. • 'GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Winmar Properties • c/o Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. E-6754 April 14, 1995 Page 14 • • Heavier truck-traffic areas will require thicker sections depending upon site usage, pavement life and site traffic. As a general rule, you may consider for truck-trafficked areas the following sections: • Three inches of AC over six inches of CRB, or • Three inches of AC over four inches of ATB. Asphalt Concrete (AC), Asphalt Treated Base (ATB), and Crushed Rock Base (CRB) materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. All rock base should be • compacted to at least 95 percent of the ASTM D-1557-78 laboratory test standard. It should be noted that parking stall pavement sections assume no truck traffic. LIMITATIONS Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the design information provided to. us by you, and our experience and engineering judgement. •.The conclusions and recommendations are`professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied. The recommendations submitted-in this report are based upon the data obtained from the borings. Soil and groundwater conditions between borings may vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory locations may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be requested to re-evaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. Additional Services This office will be available to provide consultation services relating to review of the final design and specifications to verify that our recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the approved construction plans and specifications. In addition, it is suggested that this office be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction to observe compliance with the design concepts and project specifications, and to facilitate design changes in the event subsurface conditions • differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. It should be noted that it is generally in the best interests of the owner/client to maintain the same Soils Engineer during construction in order to obtain the project objective, with optimum quality control. Earth Consultants. Inc. • al .. • ";i' •'Il'"{` ''�P' *.'; .Irk, • ; : Olk ��,�/ • R f :\ ?;,;FT DE(Vj^'.': iv'i,S:1'`'( ;'I c "11'T V� y S RENTON VILLE i Y o.PARK' i. O tiN i• I' r 149TH .a . :r•. z'r" • 1 Z - ;t�'''- 000 1 2S T '%ro F 1 r� E < tt . o� �TN r� S > tr a • $ 5 O 'If�S PL [a, � U E ST IZ' c • '9 'Y d. • SW y .. C" •, 16TH T'1:. gill! i'si Y F E :v . p1`pO- Sm153RD'::'.:.�r.-+— .� • — . Arai �.- ; q�-:- •'j.•T1. Vzt o W.--t •_7 •m c t`.:. \ _ ;çc0. 4 tT :'f7 V _; .>• • a Q .SITE,:`:LeS i a( c1 9W 19TH ST :' c:: :L m yu • ; I�• � :i S 19TH o o N W<1 y . j1 m �.... a a Z'cif Rfzce II' :,:�, Q 9 .•♦♦.•♦•♦♦♦♦•• ♦ W ILA • ♦.♦.♦..♦♦♦ lL1K S J ; ; SW 213T .T o C ~ a ♦♦�♦�♦�♦�♦�♦�•♦♦�♦�♦� PKWY 158TH ST hr 0�•�.�.�.�?..�.�.�. EVANS °�o ,Ir I • I tr.' , • ♦♦♦.♦...♦.♦ < rely Track • ��.�� 3 SLACK w 1 ♦♦.♦.♦...♦ DR a w • IV •:':II BUT ♦.�., rn r �I� :;T� __ • T__ SW 23R ST ,S 23RD v� ♦.♦BAKER BLVD I= Z ..1 S • . j ♦ ♦ ♦♦.♦ W _Icp 2BIC NTENNIA {T R• �ip I I••• `•1: R E N TO N I -' y - ' • tits .• tilOiNIT::::::i.:•;; • STRANDER •I. w G`\.. • W . I _ SW 27T ST JQ .•`` 1 . > �*,' rn% � I I . _ ..r S 2TTH•, PL .S... .'ir • - • TR CE DR i DOA Fib 2. � I > I / sPt 4 Q�Pi C_C I luul I luul •Q SW 29THiI ,.i a'. :'k�''y yL : O J PO G • I I yC_ s 9ly•5 I P I : s•'•ry '. 26.: a i 25 H �i : :_ : ',,,, wsr. • I .'' CHRIST- c, I W 30TH S7 �_ vY SW 31$1 R G EENBELTSW 33RDTU5 [LA I PK j. > I ST a I TL 4 • . CORPpRATE' I ; • ST 1., a; `" `. sly MINKLER B YD • ZI • I } ;i;;.u 1-0 1MUN/TY_UPId1ND 8F�_ — _ _ I - - --u — -� —rt�` 5 +ERGENCY CC S 38TH ST ..._ '� S>c $17.ERGEN .- J2 if.MIDLAND QTi . /... _ ' • .' � I - OSW m¢ 39TH S7 L c yj?-x-CT} asrt:::::';7:-:..-.']' I W ' .ss SQ '''e' N : . 1 .I : ie3 • 41ST ST ( VALLEY 1TTIH ST 1 TRILAND DR)_; _ 2 f .., AF. 1 EDICAL=tFnQ' S\T ~T 'av�i I A• Q I I I CENTER: .; o ,: ieoni I. t` ti' SW . I' _ Yy:;`r:, m 5� r �I I 43RD 'ST .I T.z A P' el SEGALE PARK ' t� 1615T $T: =r 18QTH—' ' ST ti t ? �_ ' . • . �j.s.. Q r� I •• • •• u`P �r` -1 .gin;-'' -_s,., :]C ':w I •D I N ,++ F I • ,w. la' , � F _ 1 F Q 4��H • _ — -pC,z - R/N�•B OK • rA:,- .4:' - „... -- .>..„ sy i.:,,. REENBELT _ -L .=••P ..s .,;.:-V;O %:4. Y, I' m Y J' r ti�A �U .7�3;� - ;rr`^tC'G. ...... � �.� .. .. . ... .. .-.. .,'fit r,- "A'.1 :.. -�• .. ''`, ..,.in1+b>`i �A.�_..vd :id"::i 0 . . :-.'..1..' • RT - Reference: II King County/ Map 41 By Thomas Brothers Maps - Dated 1990 • • '/Pv 'ik. 441\ Vicinity Map Earth Consultants Inc. Raymond Avenue Center �llPJ,v lip 1:11�) Gedeehnld Engine s.Geolog sts&Environmental SckrnWS Renton, e on, Washington Proj. No. 6754 I Drwn. GLS I Date Apr. '95 Checked DSL I Date 4/7/95 I Plate 1 r j 1 I i I 0 I Ey 0I \� I �. Q� I 1 GJ 1 I I i • I ----.2-\__________ 1 1 4th AVENUE S. , . w w i § Fc... , 6 co . ..c Reference: • Site Plan I O) Job No. 94-071 / Sheet No. Al ! ' r By Lance Mueller &Associates Dated 3/21/95 Boring Location Plan Raymond Avenue Center - Renton, Washington Checked DSL I Date 4/7/95 I Plate 2 - I. 1 I • FY SCHEMATIC ONLY- NOT TO'SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING • Surcharg e or Pr l oad Surcharge or Preload u Fil l I Fill 3i iiY:i:iiii<::4ii$:iiiiY. • :Xv:is{:iSSiiiii„...{::i. ^_ frr.. ri :}:C: ;:::{;}i};%is ::i::::Y:::i::4;}:'::iiy;{i:::::.`•: Ill-111=111^ I `L7 111=111=11i= r__r =111 _ =ltl= STANDARD NOTES 1) Base consists of 3/4 inch thick, 2 foot by 2 foot plywood with center drilled 5/8 inch diameter hole. 2) Bedding material, if required, should consist of Traction Sand. 3) Marker rod is 1/2 inch diameter steel rod threaded at both ends. 4) . Marker rod is attached to base by nut and washer on each side of base. 5) Protective sleeve surrounding marker rod should consist of 2 inch diameter plastic tubing. Sleeve is NOT attached to rod or base. • 6) Additional sections of steel rod can be connected with threaded couplings. 7) Additional sections of plastic sleeve can be connected with press-fit plastic couplings. • 8) Steel marker rod should extend at least 6 inches above top of plastic • . sleeve. 9) Marker should extend at least 2 feet above top of fill•surface. • • • d4!.sij �f�1`• 44i\ TYPICAL SETTLEMENT MARKER DETAIL 1 t4l I Earth Consultants Inc. Raymond Avenue Center 'i I., 1 i w G En . ts e E,vIf«mental Sci of Renton, Washington Proj. No. 6754 ; I Drwn. GLS I Date Apr. '95 Checked DSL I Date 4/7/95 I Plate 3 G. t.e..-,� Slope To Drain e o ' b ° e • •O • o • °o 0 ° oO• °o r inch min. - 0 o 6 c 0 _ o vo 0 0 . - o • • I. �'' -'' a. .°.' 18 inch min. �.. ••0• • , 0. -• •0••:••"° '-,.•.•'• ,. :,••.. • • o C pr• • ,• , ' •0••••-••,•°•'•0 •,'0••,.-',1, o• OO ° 4 inch min. •. ° r Diameter •,':. ,;:;•,: -•:. ° - 0 o° o • ° Perforated Pipe! • • • :•r;0:-•o o - ° o 0 0 De° o a• 0 -o° Wrapped in Drainage • 0 • o • - - o° o °° Fabric ° ,_o . sr 2 inch min. . 4-..:. 2 inch min. / 4 inch max. ,, - 12 inch . r:. min. SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING LEGEND _ -:� '`: ' Surface seal; native soil or other low permeability material. o•: -•'. Fine aggregate for Portland Cement Concrete; Section 9-03.1(2) of the o;!° WSDOT Specifications. ODrain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid PVC pipe laid with perforations or slots facing down;tight jointed;with a positive gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated plastic pipe. Do not tie building downspout drains into footing lines. Wrap with Mirafi 140 Filter Fabric or equivalent. iP,. , A411\ TYPICAL FOOTING SUBDRAIN DETAIL Earth Consultants Inc. Raymond Avenue Center 1(�Iit\WI vid Georechnld En 6 Fnvironmental Scientists Renton, Washington Proj. No. 6754. I Drwn. . GLS , I Date Apr. '95 Checked DSL 1 Date 4/7/95 I Plate 4 r 4 , • Non-Load Supporting Floor Slab or Areas Roadway Areas I• • i. 1I • % r . at a..f - " . }!y, . m ° igi Varies • 0''` 0 o 5 s 7................. ..::".,..:"...,......"'".:;" Minimum'��'' 1 Foot Mi m m 95. 0o u Y Backfill ac I • 0,' �+f: Varies • .' 0 Ao= 000aoPIPE0:: .0 • •�0: 0.✓ •�°' ii mo� d0 0oQo .• • ° o004o . Bedding 2 •o •°0 •• ; o 0 •e ••. • Varies�D"•b0g0• 04o.• %o• Q o •a•o•. 0: o.•• Q ooO °••o.•o. ( .0. O . 0• •• U •. � o. DO. 000 OD .d.• •.i °00o .o 0e'O '.0004 �' 0o, - ;tiOAo°o°•�00�nOo°0 Qod OQ •oroQ o°O • • k,x LEGEND: tiks. Asphalt or Concrete Pavement or Concrete Floor Slab ." "--sue*^ 0 o•o Oo°°; ' - • o • ,. Base Material or Base Rock • 1::�:;g �::;; •::- Backfill; Compacted On-Site Soil or Imported Select Fill '' 'J•I'iii Material as Described in the Site Preparation of the General ....... "Earthwork Section of the Attached Report Text. 95 Minimum Percentage of Maximum Laboratory Dry Density as Determined by ASTM Test Method D 1557-78 (Modified Proctor), • Unless Otherwise Specified in the Attached Report Text. • u••.,,.o°Y°�� Bedding Material; Material Type Depends on Type of Pipe and 5°a��•p`• Laying om o the Type Bedding Pipe Selectedform to . Manufacturers Recommendations ons • ioN.,l+'i.. 44t\ TYPICAL UTILITY-TRENCH FILL ` + ff FIT:till,...„ Consultants Inc. Raymond Avenue Center %II\id/ 1r`ii ,s Gmlt u5 6 itrimrnt:A 5ilscs Renton, Washington Proj. No. 6754 I Drwn. GLS - I Date Apr. '95 Checked DSL I Date 4/7/95 I Plate 5 APPENDIX A E-6754 FIELD EXPLORATION Our field exploration was performed on March 27, 1995. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling five borings to a maximum depth of thirty-five (35) feet below existing grade. The borings were drilled by Boretec, Inc. using a trailer mounted drill rig. Continuous-flight, hollow-stem augers were used to advance and support the boreholes during sampling. Approximate boring locations were determined by pacing from the approximate property corners. The locations of the borings should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate locations are shown on the Boring Location Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by an engineer from our firm who classified the soils encountered and maintained a log of each boring, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site features. All samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System which is presented on Plate Al, Legend. Logs of the borings are presented in the Appendix on Plates A2 through A10. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil:types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. '. r-. In each boring, Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed at selected intervals i- in general accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1586. The split spoon samples were driven with a one hundred forty (140) pound hammer freely falling thirty (30) inches. The number of blows required to drive the last twelve (12) inches of penetration are called the "N-value". This value helps to characterize the site soils and is used in our engineering analyses. Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. • • • Earth Consultants, Inc. , ,i. - GRAPH LETTER MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTION CD' Q ( GW Well-Graded Gravels,Gravel-Sand Gravel Clean Gravels 0 °0 °0(\ gw Mixtures, Little Or No Fines AndGravelly (little or no fines) ` 40 4 GP Poorly-Graded Gravels,Gravel- Coarse Soils I ' ! ' (l ' gp Sand Mixtures, Little Or No Fines Grained Soils More Than , I GM Silty Gravels,Gravel-Sand- 50% Coarse Gravels With * gm Silt Mixtures Fraction Fines(appreciable . Retained On amount of fines) GC Clayey Gravels,Gravel-Sand- No.4 Sieve gC Clay Mixtures oo SW Well-Graded Sands, Gravelly San And Clean Sand o o ' 0 c SW Sands, Little Or No Fines Sandy (little or no fines) d:;.:q>�:z::, .;:,•:4;;-% • a::::>:::>:: SP Poorly-Graded Graded Sands, Gravelly More Than Soils '8>: ;:::;; Y !::;>; o:.:.•.a•••.. S Sands, Little Or No Fines 50% Material ��'� p Larger Than More Than No.20D Sieve 50/ Coarse Sands With SM Sm Silty Sands Sand Silt Mixtures Size Fraction Passing No.4 Fines(appreciable f.;:.; •:.::.:.;;;;. • amount of fines) ,;,�' SC Clayey Sands, Sand Clay Mixtures Sieve r+:> >::S:`;:: SC • 1111 ML ml InorganicClayeyFine SiltsSands&Very Fineyey Sands, Siltsw/Rock FlourPlasticitySilty- ;Cla Slight Fine Silts Liquid Limit CL Inorganic Clays Of Low To Medium Plasticity, Grained And Less Than 50 / / CI Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean Soils Clays • Organic Silts And Organic 1 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 OL Ol Silty Clays Of Low Plasticity MH Inorganic Silts, Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fine. More Than I mh Sand Or Silty Soils • 50% Material Silts Liquid Limit • Smaller Than And CH Inorganic Clays Of High • No.200 Sieve Clays Greater Than 50 ch Plasticity, Fat Clays ,. Size 1' .' � OH Organic Clays Of Medium To High t.; . /i i Oh Plasticity, Organic Silts Highly Organic Soils PT Peat,'Humus, Swamp Soils l ': 1. d i, d/, d i pt With High Organic Contents e• Topsoil 'y�'y NI/ Humus And Duff Layer ��•��•��• HighlyVariable Constituents Fill ♦�.�.� •• • � . • The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classification. • • C TORVANE READING,tsf I 2"O.D.SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf W MOISTURE, %dry weight 11 24"I.D. RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER P SAMPLER PUSHED * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED i WATER OBSERVATION WELL • • pcf DRY DENSITY,lbs.per cubic ft. • LL LIQUID LIMIT,% SZ DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER • PI PLASTIC INDEX DURING EXCAVATION • 1 SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL W/DATE • • /41►* ,p 4\ LEGEND k ,lad) Earth Consultants Inc. ....xi.„.,,„lip Vtvrs.GoulogiSIS&HilvIra,nx7u:l Sclailisls Proj. No. 6754 I Date Apr: '95 I Plate Al , ,' ,Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Raymond Avenue Center 1 2 • Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 6754 DSL 3/27/95 3/27/95 _ B-1 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Boretec HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoing Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite No, u o .c Wco o Surface Conditions: Grass W Blows a E n... E N E %j a 23Ou- N . 3, �♦�♦� CL RLL•Gray sandy lean CLAY,medium stiff,wet ♦♦ .• . 1 • . • 2 — ♦♦♦ ♦♦ 20.1 11 ♦♦�S♦ ♦ 3 ♦♦♦ ♦♦♦. 4 ♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦•♦ ♦♦♦♦♦ 5 . . 22.0 19 ♦♦♦♦ 6 ML Gray SILT with sand,medium dense,wet 7 1= 8 f.- 34.1.. 7 I:; decrease in sand content,becomes loose li: 9 !' :'; 10 - " 35.8 7 11 -mixed with peat,becomes very soft 12 88.6 1 13 • • 14 -becomes soft • 15 -decrease in peat content 47.6 5 16 • -1"sand lens 17 18 In 1 o% 9 �t • \ it do',� Eel: ,.�►�, Boring Log �r i '� filmEarth Consultants Inc. Raymond Avenue Center �' \WJ"\�1I `FI °e�'ea.+a.' * "Ce(40 " &e°" en°'embalm-taiga Renton,Washington N ca —Ica Proj:No. 6754 Dwn. GLS Date Apr. '95 Checked DSL Date 4/13/95 Plate A2 'Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. I !!',Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of . Raymond Avenue Center _ 2 2 . Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 6754 DSL 3/27/95 3/27/95 B-1 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: • Boretec HSA SPT . Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoing Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite No. n o t °J N o Surface Conditions: Grass W BIOWS a E a} E N E (%) Ft o �- cn = cDI 1� `:': SP-SM Grades to black poorly graded fine to medium SAND with silt,medium dense,water i bearing 21 .: -> = 22 — a4:•: _ r .:• :: :. 23 — iiiv:: 25 • . 44.5 5 26 ML Gray sandy SILT,loose,saturated • 27 ;r • 28 I' L: 29• ,, t�: -4'of heave '' I�: ii t30SM Black silty fine to medium SAND,water bearing 28.3 3 Fig' -N Value low due to heave __'::s 31 ' `: i . 32 a: 33 — • _= 34 -3'of heave(NO SAMPLE ATTEMPT) . Boring terminated at 35.0 feet below existing grade.Groundwater encountered at 4 feet during drilling.Boring backfilled with cuttings. in o. —I ct , .L p�: 41A11, Boring Log v e �� Earth Consultants Inc. Raymond Avenue Center to, Renton,Washington E Proj.No. 6754 Dwn. GLS Date Apr. '95 Checked DSL Date 4/13/95 Plate A3 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. 'Boeing Log Project Name: Sheet of Raymond Avenue Center 1 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 6754 DSL 3/27/95 3/27/95 B-2 " Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Boretec HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoing Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite • No. 'c- o r W v7 o Surface Conditions: W Blows Q.-0 a+- a v .n j%j Ft. Lcs) U Cl) Cl) • ••• SM FILL:Dark gray silty fine to medium SAND,medium dense,wet 1 ••�� 2 — •�*�� •.ot 27.1 16 �� 3 .4. 4 N ••1♦ 18.0 14 •.„i .. 6 ML Gray SILT,medium dense,wet 26.2 14 8 .. ;e • 9 -mixed with peat,becomes very soft If 10 43.5 1 11 . 12 • 81.9 2 13 14 qu=.75tsf 15 54.1 3 • • 16 SM Gray silty fine to medium SAND,medium dense,water bearing • . == = 17 — 18 a =` = 19 \ ifi. i' 1 `4- Os, AI: AV Boring Log • N 11 i Earth Consultants Inc. Raymond Avenue Center Mk\WI `tl ff 000k 'nngineeM O001004$&BriVbCanitaidl scienstais Renton,Washington —lea Proj.No. 6754 Dwn. GLS Date Apr. '95 Checked DSL Date 4/13/95 Plate A4 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. • ' Boring Log IProject Name: Sheet of Raymond Avenue Center 2 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 6754 DSL 3/27/95 3/27/95 B-2 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: _ Boretec HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: • ❑ Monitoing Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite No, u o .c d N — Surface Conditions: . %) Blows o.E o-'�• E full E • Ft. LN au- �N SM Black silty fine to medium SAND,medium dense,water bearing 29.4 16 21 22 — 23 — • 24 — • 25 • — 31.1 13 26 — 27 — • • r., 28• • ', 29 — fM1: -5'of heave(NO SAMPLE ATTEMPT) 30 Boring terminated at 30.0 feet below existing grade.Groundwater encountered at 4 feet during drilling.Boring backfilled with cuttings. • • • • tn' o. \' iT,„ Aits, Boring Log ter' 4( :-.00 Earth Consultants Inc. Raymond Avenue Center mRenton,Washington 03-1 Proj.No. 6754 Dwn. GLS Date Apr. '95 Checked DSL Date 4/13/95 Plate A5 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of Information presented on this log. j,,Bo'ring Log Project Name: Sheet of Raymond Avenue Center 1 2 I Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 6754 DSL 3/27/95 3/27/95 B-3 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Boretec HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: I ❑ Monitoing Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite No. u o .c • col 4- Surface Conditions: Grass W Blows =a.11a-I- E 8 E (o) Ft. 2 cn 24 A = rn . ♦♦♦♦♦ SM FILL:Gray silty fine SAND with gravel,loose to medium dense,wet ♦♦♦♦♦♦ : ♦: 1 ■ ♦ •♦ , ♦♦♦♦♦ I. ♦♦♦♦♦ 2 - ♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦ 25.0 12 3 CL (6"of TOPSOIL) / Gray lean CLAY with sand,medium stiff,wet 4 � -rootlets to 4' 5 37.2 5 6 7 "? S II 41.3 4.. .;. • E`7 4/// 10 ty, 105.0 2 o, `o, PT PEAT,soft,saturated ,, 0,, , 11 \t4 ,,+4 ,, d i., .. 12 ..4 0 4 13 -becomes soft 79.6 1 +, oi, very • ML Gray SILT,very soft,saturated 14 15 SM Dark gray silty fine SAND,loose,water bearing 41.6 5 1s ;: • 17• 1 =8 u0.) 19 • do'. i11: 44i>,, Boring Log ` 1i 1 yt� Faith Consultants Inca Raymond Avenue Center In ��11;/ UV MO O an0o'e ca sas.e aeolo¢ .Euiviicennenita Eicielgtsts CD Renton,Washington m-) Proj.No. 6754 own. GLS Date Apr. '95 Checked DSL Date 4/13/95 Plate A6 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. ' ,Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Raymond Avenue Center 2 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 6754 DSL 3/27/95 3/27/95 B-3 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Boretec HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoing Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite No. o .c rn o Blows Surface Conditions: Grass W a a+- °- v (%) Ft r2.3 DI o Cl) M SM Dark gray silty fine SAND,medium dense,water bearing 28.3 16 21 • 22 — 23 — 24 — 25 31.2 8 26 27 — • 28 29 f. 30 " 27.1 32 31 Boring terminated at 31.5 feet below existing grade.Groundwater encountered at 4 feet during drilling.Boring backfilled with cuttings. • 4 ,4►1, Boring Log A Earth Consultants IfC. Raymond Avenue Center Renton,Washington —Ica Proj.No. 6754 Dwn. GLS Date Apr. '95 Checked DSL Date 4/13/95 Plate A7 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on thi s log. , ' oBo'ring Log • Project Name: Sheet of Raymond Avenue Center 1 2 • Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 6754 DSL 3/27/95 3/27/95 B-4 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Boretec HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoing Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite No. o r 51 top Surface Conditions: ., Blows =n. a-1-. a v la • 96) Ft c� to cl I` to = cn � • ML FILL:Gray sandy SILT,medium dense,wet • 4 ? CL Gray lean CLAY with peat,medium stiff,wet 26.6 7 5 - . 6 : 7 ;W 8 l,28.0 10 F; 9 r" / fi. u=.5tsf. / 10 q / 47.1 6 / • // it .` PT PEAT,very soft,saturated . ‘t 6 ,, 12 or, ab 13 72.7 2 's .!r. i ' ML Gray SILT,soft,saturated 14 • 15 29.7 16 ' '?' SM Dark gray silty fine SAND,medium dense,water bearing • 17 == 18 — in -w . (NI ._.�: _: 19 •--1\I `t 1.,, theI411 Boring Log N � -.001] Earth Consultants Inc. Raymond Avenue Centerm / I� aeoe°no ig' '°a'.°°°'°0'"&�'�i'°`�'° 'ear'°'" Renton,Washington -I Proj.No. 6754 Dwn. GLS.. Date Apr. '95 Checked DSL Date 4/13/95 Plate A8 co Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or ' interpretation by others of information presented on this log. ,Bering Log Project Name: Sheet of Raymond Avenue Center 2 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: • 6754 DSL 3/27/95 3/27/95 B-4 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Boretec HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: _ ❑ Monitoing Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite No. o W o Surface Conditions: Blows a }n_i- g- n • %j Ft cn o u n SP-SM Grades to gray poorly graded medium to coarse SAND with silt,medium dense, water bearing 27.8 17 >'iit 21 — e.;: x .>G -6"of heave 22 r'•#io 23 Boring terminated at 23.0 feet below existing grade.Groundwater encountered at 4 feet during drilling.Boring backfilled with cuttings. • Q Boring Log Kt II Earth Consultants Inc. Raymond Avenue Center m id/ 0) Renton,Washington Proj.No. 6754 Dwn. GLS Date Apr. '95 Checked DSL Date 4/13/95 Plate A9 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. . : ,.;Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Raymond Avenue Center 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 6754 DSL 3/27/95 3/27/95 B-55 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Boretec HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoing Well El Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite No. u o .c a) N o Surface Conditions: Grass W BIOWS a E a.'�- E 8E • v%) Ft LN pLi- N N �♦�♦� SM FILL:Gray silty SAND,loose to medium dense,wet ♦♦ j♦j♦• 1 - ♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦ ♦♦♦• 22.9 18 3 CL Gray lean CLAY,medium stiff,wet 4 5 23.7 g / 6 Boring terminated at 6.5 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during drilling.Boring backfilled with cuttings. -- .. f.. U) o` .t t') 14 41,411, Boring Log N ``11%-,01 Earth C0nsultants Inc. �1� 1 °°°'°ai'°" �"a "°°"°°°" r~� "` "`'° " 'ea«.� Raymond Avenue Center ' Renton,Washington co m-1 Proj.No. 6754 Dwn. GLS Date Apr. '95 Checked DSL Date 4/13/95 Plate A10 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of Information presented on this log. SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS ' _ B. SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH•-U:S STANDARD- GRAIN SIZE-IN MM r� 00 8 8 ppM N .— z Z. i�T/ eN— N-v v O^ a° O (p O O 0 0 O p 0 0 O O N p 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 w t0 Cr el N �- c i in c0 CO�- .- N M t1'J t0 00 N o �. too IN �d 90 -o` --n 10 p rD .D 80 20 Dor 30 73 ri n C. m 70 O -Z-I Z crl 5) 71 so ao -I F Z n 1a, 50 50 73 0 W co C 3 Cf) -< 1 MI• g * 40 60 hcl E "" COn � r_" c.) �; 1 30 70 m 3 n _ CD 20 80 -1 A x- m a 9 10 0 C1 In r N 0 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ►I 1 1 1 1 I I III 1 100 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O O O O co CO tt CI N O CO CD 'Cr CON .— CD V CI N °0 f0 M N 00 f0 f`7 N 0 O O O O O O O O O O • D_ DIN GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS • 0 0 0. 0. 0 0 ✓ • p, Z COARSE ] FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE CD Cl) COBBLES FINES Fj GRAVEL SAND CD m m w G CD D Boring or DEPTH Moisture P• m D KEY USCS DESCRIPTION Ctent(%) LL PL Test Pit No. (ft.) on u, w n 1 rtm 0 0 rt y s K 0 B-1 2.5 CL Gray sandy lean CLAY 20.1 -- -- .. m p—=— B-3 2.5 CL Gray lean clay with SAND 25.0 -- -- I-, 5a _T 100 80 x 60 W Z CH j 40 `�-A-Line CD J a.. 20 • r:, CL-ML ®gI OL 0 20 40 60 80 100 LIQUID LIMIT • Natural Key Boring/ Depth Soil Classification USCS L.L. P.L. P I. Water Test Pit (ft) Content • • • B-2 15 Gray SILT ML 47 32 15 54.1 • B-4 7.5 Gray lean CLAY CL 40 24 16 28.9 Atterberg Limits Test Data yea, a1: �i�►� �• Raymond Avenue Center �� $, Earth Consultants Inc. Renton, Washington '.MPk('i'J``V�J Geotedmlol Engineers,GeologLsts&En lmnmental Sclentlsts Proj. No.6754 IDate Apr. '95 II'Iate B2 a. 7•C�ti - DISTRIBUTION E-6754 4 Copies Winmar Properties c/o Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. 10801 Main Street, Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Attention: Mr. Mark Miller 1 Copy Lance Mueller and Associates 130 Lakeside Avenue, Suite F Seattle, Washington 98122 Attention: Mr. Bob Fadden Earth Consultants, Inc.