Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA96-022
T 4) T T T T p T I T 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 © 18 i'��DOWN �� METAL RODP �y \ODwN .11I I.I LLI lI If I I I I I.LLLL I IIIDDwN DOWN .- Iil�IliiliiUliiiillllllllll� ` I Ii�«illi i ifLIL Hq,G3 m urnl T ��� ( � r IIIIIIIII i P � II q ! GON6TRUCi[ON .- SPOUT elfDv, 4 6P°UT BrOVT� 1i METAL BIDMO "1"----ti IZ R RG SID`ND'.'Y - - I __ ..Y // i;1617eNM TUN°rN izO 0, P . 1----ZMg wLt'- V toP[N—A 0 I.I I' 0 I � .. rN PL. Le weL.Le 2 o O Q zF ,O ZR,�YM0U 1'AR 6ADR 0 Y OSOUTH ELEVATION BMILPIND z 0)SCALE. 1/16". 1'-O" J Z 0 Wa W 03'4 m Wr ® �7 6 5 T. 3 2 1Q1 0 9Q 8Q 7Q 6Q 5Q 4Q 3Q 2 1Q W a . II II1II 4 4 �(� I1II�I� I III I I II 7I 1I�1I��i i IIIIN¶� U I— W F a L tIQIlIIIIIIJ� I r��METAL ROOF �ti mono IIIIIIIIIII IIII up' �e R 0 STANDARD OUTTGII ,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'IIIItIIIIIIIIIIII'IIT 0 C LVMN•18'•t0 T(C'e L co 0=N p�ggl�glpll[�Illlliplipl@I�ll� IlppOp Non HA6[3 w~ POUTRUGTION-- - ., I O a U A Do3z Jr—s.o: ,_______.METAL BIDMD.".------.1 Er---"--:r', cic --s.o r —' 9 4,4 w I— Do y a 11I III x I TD PANGLR-10'-D- O O O 0 ...... ..�.. .. •... .. ro .. .. .. PIN.PLR.L TO we. W 1L U 11'NIDN GONG.icy 5. LT-UP WALL' - GONLRGTC 4GTAININO� - GONG R[TAM[NG WALL T0� • -O PUTUR[FLOOR L[vGL YGNINO•Ra IOINO 0 ll'C P PGRIM[TG OP (TRACKS AT MO[1 fY F PH =G°"°TR°°T'°" 2 N O R T H E L E V A T I O N s SCALE, 1/16-. r•o" Q W 0 /per IL d O METAL ROOF © © e 13 -1.018 COLUMN•RB-t0 T/e HI: 0T0 LDLUNN f>.° PUTG S. ..,....._,METAL BIDING tl'HION CONE.'' �.. [LGV•f'-0- F. rIN PLR T1LT.LIP WALL '' .. . TOP N WALL y e - ae LOND TAININO - O 0 n © E A S T E L E V A T I O N 3 ° 3f s 2 SCALE. 1/16"•1'-0" to ^S' M T Y ® © @ I-z e - .Bxe r— -t1of • N TO COLUMN f>01H na m` i c Li v LONSTRULTION� - `>• 11 Q_C x EG U c o / CU DULAR (/) N n I IIIII 1I p t r IIL wP LB t3 0 6N[ TO 4N[ O *Iep CONS�'i Q LONLR[T[R[TA[NIN°` ` PIN PLR 0 R PN�BLG 3 N7.17"T10011 2 4 W E S T ELEVATION E V A T I O N O or SCALE. tn6"- 1.-O. 2 - • --1 HONZWTAL DARN: CONTROLLING SCNCNNARK: CITY Of RFNTW W Ott 6 RCNNN BENCHMARK NQ 672 I NAO DJ/SI CHISELED SARE IN CONCRETE WALK M/ 1 6.5 FEET WEST AND 1.0 FEET NOR / \ VERTGI DANK 0(SERVICE ENTRANCE 0001 TO GTV OF RENTON SAN YOUNKER'S OATS.: -' EILVAIICN-20.0. ,AwL 1r - CONTOUR INTERVAL-a FEET " I` � %,�Asp. 1:air — — I i — — — / / • NBJ'30'2}-W __ }50.47' .. E / \/ •off-N9.85 ��N875023 W- K� "-" 1 rte� 3--Illiiiiiilli I Q I..' WIIIMIIIII 0 p w UE. F ;] r «s .. �IL O ozu I/ \ 3 "" / �� !' I — "�I I R NeisDz3 _ s O t z o I, \ / \' ' ' ' I Z m w o \�I I Y�I I\ 0 t 90'00'00" / /I I '� I ILi - • I I c nI �E > uaa •+ _1 W• ,ur J \ L 70.69 ' I I 1t I ' I I PAVED WITH PHASE I CONSTRUCTION 1 ,uRK V ' OAT 'AT_.D I �--�� �`� 111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111/111111 III I III o W� �3w O•-0- IL UI LI of IlIO Zp I! ; ; JI �.. r \ .ma co co . II I I NOT PARRTT OF PROJECT I ..„,,\ •r,lr :!, �'! I l Slid:i I �I III IIII III ; i/ I W �- i r I , I ' \ �� � �/�1 II, (� II 1!. ![�i.o D a ,/ LOT 1 /� ° W• m F I E, , R PD o . �,�� - ,� 'T;:l:l I�I� ,�fiv// �r, RRUMW III ► , W I IZ I / \ 0=70'38'S6' / EAsd/•// / 1/1 TRNa w:>70'.0•orrcVvw rwa I 1 rwa]w P.1)rS/ , • ' • I / \.471,78' / �' , "' I uarz�LOs."rtD"N°R rD DE .Ko Wt I ti • ii • II' I,� / / .a'I//21 I1 I LOTILA So• .„„„.• LOT B I sp /� .' X • �A• f p • ..., . ; TTP 7:0:"[Mn' Duc; I I A 76'03'69'^ / �I1/e : / '/�/ lli j''/�/rII II e� %• L1111 „i . i i r /w � Il�lllll�llillll1.1 xVW . ,. _ _ - 0 I 00 I 01. ^ //I , 161.65' _ aIII,/�� j;! 7 O VICINITY PLAN m I I ' i /i'< ../''�•' j/; �I.1,1 „4 pl '/ -'� N V O n I _ l" D Ar.��.13.�:� - 1- p MT.' - ' _ --. _ ��a���l�i�u���a-sra�� N8730'47'W �a q� g 1?-`-i7 n— _ i naI 517.68T so.eg__ L w no. Da p.. -- -- >O v o QMANE, — -- --- .N . -------- POND ORCR EON A-0751'2B• A m 03'49'33- r ai ''''' ' ..9. Li L 0.1 ' rR. err.HD Nnun R.606.87' R=02'73'S9" R-605.87' - L.��. NO2V9'13'E 20.00' (/)3 sJErEA¢ --- L.87.09' L e 2714'7 MAUL, .AMLr R i o n co DRIVEWAY w'", ran 0 .rHar L • LOCATION AREAS ' o n•T ODE Of MD AW-a PARKING ANALYSIS DOOR SOON OF SR.NM)L Q ¢IVM)DR-tr Mr „ 00•0'R SG'PARKING!PACES PROVIDED. _•C • • --• LOTS 4 D.BURLINGTON NORTHERNBIN --- TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OP WE. INCLUDING 3•0'%30'HANDICAP SPACES. (T'� - SW 04O BITE PLAN 505 ACRE! t 1'WIDE VAN ACCESS AISLE PROVIDED. U C I ' SW>4TH ST.DETW[EN LIVID AVG. -_, !WILDING/QUAKE FOOTAGE . ! EACH AACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE!HALL '�' AHD EAST VALLGT ROAD.R[NTON.WA WAR[NOUSL coast L •),)QO 9Q.PT. D[IOENTIFICD DT A SIGN REQUIRED PER LODE REOV[REMENTS TGMPORART OFFICE O S I T E P L A N pPPOCT eD�a 0 Li 5a Wes`o:K;NO STALLS AND ACCESS AISLES 00.000 9Q FT. /MOWN AREA TO DE LINED WITH WHITE SWEAT 9[TDACK!PROM PROPERTY WARCNOU/E.PciALr:0 3. >3300 9O PT TRAFFIC PAINT i SCALE. 1'• 40'-0' L cw>MTH 6TR'eT� I N -- REpUIR[0•f6' ROVID[D.SOS' --• TOTAL PROJ •Ot0"OR T. SHUT UILLIAI SETBACK!FROM INTERIOR PERCENTAGE OT COVGRA6GPROPERTY L1NE6 [tREQUIRED.WAPROVIDED.) YIN. E 3. BUILDING H[IGHT� TOTAL PARKING AND TRUCK MANEUVER ALLOWED.N/A PROVIDED... AREA. 10..270 OPT. OF 1 TOTAL LANDSGPINO 6307 SOFT. I ____.--- K-_ S_m--i_41H $TRFFT III i¢ . �0 1 PLANT SGf IEDULE � � 0 j DX iI_ I aTlE0. I EOTN,KiL NAPE/COITKN NAYe I aIIP I NOR9 I �- \ .:- \_. `_ �- \_ __ __ ___ Q i 0 -SETREETTTR g ,e@aM e.eM.omFa. '9Rlil EASISDAMAR P 1 � �, & i • rye PAWING� ' ���OT�SIJADEES w rx e.e.rurom ram f1 Z O QT )- (l�Tl am.wow.WO eaeYrr�rurte I FUTURE BLDG ExPAN9lON r I u m J G. MAID 1•ENaTLvAAr.tatre•GA.1 .r��I�j p O"' ODECIDUOUS ACCENT TREESAGM v.GAL e.e,NATaeD ram • I =DWI S� 1 LOT I 3 W r IYIPPKISC ./' 07 1 11111 1 1111CIi III' i i I Il(i1 ! I 1111 I ' Ily— Vm Ti w wMw __ li f I+ i I hi I i ( I U j .we��a.oEa� ! I+ il i "?' �I �I 11 I i ii 111 III%% ! I{� I i'� ;i( 1 I •� I�1'I'I`() I/;lj/J /I(E(II '..r, i I EI ���1 ( :I-'+' 'I o 'SAILA RI., 1 riii i1i Jiii ,OMAR 4w .an (/% I : I1 7Jf11i� N661, Acc rsuRues •� ¢ØiI!1/ll;hi -- II iGili 1,�i 1 ,i� I! !(I'a( I'i iiI; � + i { a J ,D x lllfllrcii ii I llll'll il 'ill lil1!'; pi a 3 O kF o n" ".." H LAMS. I' 'i I+iI ii It Ni 1/ II`1'ill OTTO , yrlli Ii €NATIVETES .-e ur - f - r ji i ,l 11 I I t t1-�_ II (I I III ii ' i ���, ' ( i I i., t I tllNATIVE 5HRI1B5 ie-v aaL roLlrc % . 11ii 1 i`!r,I Il-i. 1 I{t II -i - f ''' V� 1 i �:!� �� ( l-,:il is I, _lf!li �i ii 1 IEXISTING VEGETATION MAPS 5; 1 I .. I it !:I d TO REMAIN _REO ate._; N / +� / d.r GROUNDCOVER s ror eon r `4 i HNtiBEmEDLAN //i`�/ I LOT A LOT 8 r�// 1a y.:y CjIco' i I '!/,�,�,Ar�'�.4 E%Jalo.COMM..N+Dr osEED o a a f ��I s°rr ��SCAPE NOTES: m �i',- II11,l �>;, eT O '�PRELS(NARYPLAN MGDESIGN 19 SCHEMATICFINALPLAN INGN' Ll'�'i,� jil, ( I�!£ iI�� ..I.�4� tDEOIC31 TO BE1TTED WRu BUILDINGF£RMRAFPLICATIQIDEXISTING VEGETATIONr I / --tab,' I �w/�� µ�'oI/� TO REMAIN cT�—i ]. ALL NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS rExcEPr ERe01aN CONTROL uromDSeeD) p / O,• , TO CE IRRIG6IED WTH A itLLLT AUTLMATIG IRRGATION 9TSTFH p I / ,�//� �t O O '!.. IRRIGATION DEBKN TO BE SUBMITTED WITH&1RDWCa PERtIi AFRICATICN D_' 3 1 L S V'! �,1 ' tfiw✓�� �._y.:�q�. ' 3. GROVO COVER TO E%TE1ID UNDER N1 TREE N�9NRIJB CANOPIES AT T{ff q ..: SPECIFIED SPACING TO PRONDE CONPLEfE COVERAGE M ALL RANTING � '� •e �// ;�� w�' O^, BEDS DESIGNATED TO FECEIVE GROUND COVER D • �� �J j O� ,% 4: 4 4. SCHALDAPE DRAY WILD ARE BASED ON THE SITE PLAN FREPARED RC BY - / BCHAIIDT 8TEM1.WLD INC.ITIEDIATELY NOTIFY L6'�SCAPE ARCHITECT GF W j is •�� P f.0 _'''` -- ANY FIELD/Gnalr-FO TO THE SITE PLANS WHICH MAY RECAP£ADJLL4TMENT ~L OF DESK31 s y° r• I ra , DETENTION POND S. REFER TO CIVIL ENGMEE E I- BIO'JJAALE IFOFMATION IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CF ANY 0 I u'4 ADVE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS WING!MAY AFFECT TUE HEALTH CF PLANT Q w -, E, I S A MNSCA aF 0'CS S0L COMPOST 5Ot. F E 5.4CC N ALL OLL NEW =- C v TI-CUB APE AREAS.INSTALL A MMIMIH CF]'CF FINE BARG IN ALL NEW V ET elate AND G OOVER BEDS. N N 9 1. NO PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDES TO BE USED ON THE PROJECT SITE DURING E�R t THE FIRST YEAR WAFR'AMEE FEROD. t S. ALL CEDAR AND FIR TREES TO BE NIRSERY GROIN WITH CENTRAL 1. ORIGINAL LEADER INTACT AND I-ENLIST. STATE Ta ELT ox P Brumbaugh&Associates ad. "�°T°® — LANDSCAPE PLAN �n,ait�rurB L' 4 _ SCALE: I•',40'-0" 1915 Rttlmt�,A SB1V confluxwo.Re OF i 1 7 ® ® 14 /5 /6 ©/ 18O30 ®/ 36'-0" ® 3'-0' ® 36 O / 36'-0' / 36 D ®/ a6 O ®/ a6'-0' / 36'-0' 10/ ab'-0- / ib'0' 36'-O' 3 36'0" A 9T-a V. ._---MA.K,ro.,„a o=z,;,.. fL Iz ° ui3 PHASE TW D Ip U 0<0 WAREHOUSE >a360 SG PT. `..0 Z E.r...G- iR1YEe J w Q DOCK K J rE W K INr c N..uEv nw j W p F ^ry aly E. N W I N Q 0 �W 235 itl co 3 z w , m or)u;a N X PHASE O NL 0 (J) 0 WAREHOUSE 4 0 Z 0>J M 00 O T. DOCK EDOE LO = a1 0 9 O F- �..> • Quo G000K J S. U DO of EDGE....-..../ a :Mk _ a �SLAD EDGE a 1 5 G i L 7 - o N — � ._S i A 3 _ 11 ,1.I to \ \O i w• — u6NOP MELDING M T 4 ii w— a A F 0 N ' 14 D 0 6 DO Q N z Ui UC - a rn1' — N . 1.3, o 1 F L O O R PLAN N NMI 1 oP 2 II o.N E o..RUEM MY \ BOTR AVE Et— 0 MALI. RORINERN.USTRIAL PAW PLRIJNOTON WHINE..WOO.TRIAL PARX N. 4 i Y iI-1 1 1,0.1. 1!ASOhRI snexee.Rl nail MIFF RANT PFOGSTRUNr,LII. i i eww aOTON NPR x\JcRN wove z , miLD40 AVE .1, g ,( It'a"' N CO _a �' ❑ aF� wuaaSi DIAL E ,Ii IIIII1dTT]g. all. II I I I ` i II P...„E.PNEk.,,a. luLl! ° III\ 1,11141.111;__' /6\ice a 0 4 FERRARI .' 'I fl P P AR HIT -T P. �)1}y1 ISUNIVOV RevmoNawrrcw C Q TELEPHONE 2 0 6. 8 2 1. 3 3 8 3 FARWEST STEEL NEIGBOORHOOD DETAIL MAP N 12277 134TH COUHT'NE,SUITE'203.REDMOND,WA 9805272433 YN 223 b e D0.RORw S.W. e CC..OAST %3D N'"}"" S. . 34TH STREET ' CIR.BPVC(aNW,..)d8a m b aD , , �� ass '3 ESS ` —i�� O -Tz SD w- 'e•si e.CUR. J aae CUT I` r • �ll�— /� — — —CONCRETE P. e — — — �m ! = - — �� Ex,:�.1. .�.• _.,.'��i Ezm, .c.. -_ \ curve ��0.w"Y•_-"n,. = °„ms^...� , ..n.Yx ��,son.0 .-._ rEwN•._ __ '(r.';.,1 1*! .t .• • Sim r -- NB]50'2J•W 350.17' -- ..l�.BS`m NB]50'23•W N8]5023'W ® 400.15_ •®"Y. S®•' 0 W —}N8]—SO'23'eo —L .).- I I D�ArcDSGPE�� C% PE}MN.IX rS_i __� — _ : �— _ `- __� _ / a � 1 ,...\ DN D EST. �/7-2 m.,� D r 04, _ I I ►i 5 G �pD� le / ERItt E9�i. S�Od W I I • S1µli IB-4�� / �igE�,fV.,E➢ [, "I ••• • ` \ 9Dt]0•DO• Ef ..[Erg +® ®• . � (rv",ui� @ I a.:Nm. , / Le BON I I TFVPwwwr�Z PHASE TWO W ARGW Ua G NORIZ\°L DATUu: T I _ USED RR wTERY in.c� i� R. ;�',7, �— n \\ T7#tE I I 1NTGftIM PAVED ARGA I pYR00yy SYiyxy mat(rwluE I °tl ` NCITY OF. 3�ENTON 1 I. 1ST Ern. .® ' ®. 0 , / i�' \ I I \ I JI $�cm.:•P,<(S.+q-.1L\ VERnCFL DANFL` '/ a l�vfD w,rzR _ uI ' f .•�9 \ ' I\ GTY OF RENiON K itI I'l I ,I III' I II I CONTROWNG ON 8D AR. I P M A 9 G O N G q � 'P\ CITY RENTON BENCHMARK NO.672 wpp0�1T DJ.Y,nR till WARGNOUSG I 1 �(I� . . II III �''r 1 °\ DOFF SEANCE ENTRANCE DOOR TOvB,T / I 5EC YOUNKCR'S DAISUN: 1 �1� ELIaVAION-20.04' _ _I II C UR INTERVAL-2 FEET //�� 1 i qu, I I I I I I I I I I II ,I - m�® /,' I / 1 / \ III .... 10 b,Sm a n. .sA.r\ ,/ 4a zD 0 so lb 1z0 Flit: I I' I TL9' I •. SERY[E AS E09 R ' SCALE IN FEET/ W (SEE.ROI PUTS) / j \ iI I mYw W 14a 1 1 ) /� \ Ii/ l 3 �FY� ��• �� (// aQ �1 I I `I / (N�A MT Di iwf.WuuTbx) \ / �'',DLe ; '� I. L'��( wv"F�� / , .]6tl!'49• PDST ` \ R.TRo.O { (I , I 9,r {•' 'ems i-sea so CI z I` it Y DDin�; / 1 FASWET ir i Dm..co-caE I I �¢ _ ew5nn �� I / // I B5w mD nAt[rm APIA D�� SIGHT •J I I1 I o-705836• / f 9 S R rem SPIN.,RED IP.enemy mE Es. / // ' I R Dwell ACM • Ij1 / s SCR VALVE x SEHR ,M M,,. /. 4]1.78' / /j. �! II i PROPOSED I u+NDFIR•iE I • // PROPOSED AND DONJON.,MCAT.SPINA I �3'E ND YE,ER~ OR ru. tic 1 I ® �n. m LOT9.¢ ew A RR SERvIC b, I _ o lV I tee) // PROPOSrID,�a wCN G I/, , If 11 � OT.ov 1 •I y I ` , E 1�arm, • «!F /�,''/ ROPFR VNE 9lru R RELOCATED di M:PVOPEq�tt,�iEC'iE PR�DACT ,, ! Duck.SPUR 1: iV¢HYI�I �!Y_ DP Ts \ / - // DU..PE PNG,ION. 1 I 1 P W.M. w STES O RAGE%uNDsc,nNc // �� { 'I Mg!, ' � / / %./ / • FUNK a¢E PiPF `p Yw MEV..1100 '1600 uSJ4...IR,., F•_e. I z]DD 56 n. // J V. u,S NB750'47•W V�`{, /„!1�0�' m / I — /( 'VI-_- ,-// �j —e 5 , •s / ¢Ev-�eea MOO Is1.65' `/ �� 5 1®— i I Q-6• , �;--CP` '� V��V PROPOSED IE•D.w.m 6 .E: _ PONT 1 i I •' /'�� / �� / I _munutt C,N.ELOeU1C �/ 1e� / �' • ,9� OZB I IUD• �_/ ' FAS[TDET ` ram+ /ce er 290.01'� Ank�eFF�� D'E"A --�" =Ail�—� NBT30'1YW . 51758' e '' Io. �-0 _ m Y9 , r • DC,D me REi..A¢ �— "1Y elk N020 913 E 20.00' POD _ ANLL, -_ AVHALT Horton Dennis 0.AssoolNea,Ino / ' S _ a," , aN CONTROL smunuaE itDEiroDSRD IHR x Du)YIN REc,R¢rO1 µ PRICES Sv D7 R-805.8]' 3„ D TOP FEY.1720 " L' 40.46 CITY OF RENTON ,SPILLi _• — --. W EGRESS/EDAMESYf. ""' A-07451.213T -`4.• DEPARTMENT OP PUBLIC WORKS Z. R=60SeT —A-02.33'59' • 83.09' R-27.14'' -••••• "•-• ''•••'•.•••••••- PFJMNARY STORM DRML WATER C%DflOVIgN BAST NNTRO-SMU... L-2].14' Fz rmE.<a (xwEBAs1 S NARY SEWER ANAN RAWESTS'TEH_D RE SITE F S Omm .... S/,.gee Eor 14.1.4.0502.0. .2 en. r c r-w 555 woe en MEM B. .PPR. w¢ unrom. �„_.��.� PEED 1 00 1 At....: :; CITY IF RENTON u. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 13, 1999 Mick Hunter Farwest Steel Corporation PO Box 889 Eugene, Oregon 97440 Subject: Approval of Minor Modification of Farwest Steel Site Plan City File#LUA96-022, SA---201 SW 34th Street, Renton Dear Mr. Hunter: Thank you for letter requesting City approval of an additional 12' by 53' modular building. As proposed on the attached site plan dated August 31, 1999 and received by the City on September 2, 1999, the modular will be located adjacent to an existing modular building of the same size to the south of the existing Farwest Steel main building. As you may know from discussions with Laureen Nicolay of my office, the City of Renton Municipal Code permits me to grant minor modifications to approved site plans. Your proposal to site a second modular structure pursuant to the attached site plan is hereby approved. No additional environmental or land use approvals are required. You are now eligible to obtain your building permit and any other associated Building Division permits (electrical, etc.) provided your plans comply with all Uniform Code requirements. This is an administrative determination. To appeal this determination, a written appeal-- accompanied by the required $75.00 filing fee--must be filed with the City's Hearing Examiner (1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, 425-430-6515) no more than 14 days from the date of this decision. Your submittal should explain the basis for the appeal. Section 4-8-110 (attached) of the Renton Municipal Code provides further information on the appeal process. Please feel free to contact Laureen Nicolay or me at 425-430-7294 should you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, (------ 7 (..›.---J na Hanson Development Services Division Director c: File#LUA96-022, SA Building Division Parties of Record 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 - A This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer — . T pi • • TILVELOPMENT PLANK FARWEST STEEL CITY OFRENTON Corporation SEP U 2 1999 • RECEIVED August 30, 1999 Jennifer Henning ' Principle Planner 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, Wa. 98055 I.E. Site Plan Modification • Dear Jennifer, We would like to add to our existing temporary module building currently being used for our shipping/receiving office and locker room. The additional building we are requesting is the mirror image of the 12' x 53' module in place. We need this additional space to accommodate our increase in workforce size with new lockers and eating area. • Our warehouse measures 165' x 420', giving us a total of 69,300 square feet. The . combination of the temporary buildings in total square footage would be 1,272. Please see the attached sketch of our proposal, and feel free to call us if you have any questions. Our phone number is 1-425-656-3261: Sincerely, _P H �� TIf • Mick Hunter Farwest Warehouse Superintendent P.LE. � r ,,Post Office-Box 889-. • -- Eugene; Oregon 97440-0889 • =1541) 686-2t?�C-;:==�_•��:--r Y:=< : .SEE) Location: 2000 Henderson Ave. • Eugene, OR 97403 TOPS FORM 7462- Eugene Tetefax(541) 683-9250 "' I I s • r I - - - ----+--.- ---- - - - - - 1 1 L--1 _ - -�. T - ---- - - - - --- • 1 t t I I ♦ I t t - ..' - I 1 • -- N. -- - �✓NNOVAI ED AS+ 1 AUTHORITY-TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL --- - ------ .r PROVISIONS OP CODES. OROI- _ , % �.-fiR OTHER REQUI AT1ONS Di I FORC_D BY THIS CITY �1JJh-L/O 7i S4 -i + -- - .._ DATE-1.0/40PPROVECI Ila ftl fr- PERMT - N -- - J - ._ I 0 , r. it __ . , icb,actc.,y.AIR : , . ,, ; N n oi 1 i 1 . _h_FPEs-in,`\(\ !Cl /.. . , ; : • , 1 _ : i , i , 1 y � '"- 1 ..I... , . ' --_-,____11 . 1 i_t_ W�Ho i -- 20 . 4 r-7---: ____,_ ___ I`\ 3TO ,' f 305 C I 1�1� q S i P4 0 AD o►-rio�.)- 6 �g./X SS 14i 1.6T. 3 ( J I - - Act '_ NG SA-—9(9 -0 2-2- Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055-2189 Title: UTILITIES EASEMENT Property Tax Parcel Number: 125360-0070 Project File U S Rentals Street Intersection or Project Name:SW 34th @ Lind Ave SW • Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Powell Orillia,LLC 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation 2. The Grantor,as named above,for and in consideration of mutual benefits do by these presents,grant,bargain,sell, convey,and warrants unto the said Grantee,its successors and assigns,an easement for public utilities(including water, wastewater,and surface water)with necessary appurtenances over,under,through,across and upon the following described property(the right-of-way)in King County,Washington: Additional legal is on page 4 of document. (Abbreviated legal description MUST go here) 17. LEGAL DESCRIPTION:Ptn L 8 Burlington Northern,BSP rec K C R N 9206302696 per Plat rec in V 161, pp 8-11,KC,WA in S 30 T 23N R5 E WM. ems For the purpose of constructing,reconstructing,installing,repairing,replacing,enlarging,operating and maintaining utilities and utility pipelines,including,but not limited to,water,sewer and storm drainage lines, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor. Following the initial construction of its facilities, Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The Grantee shall,upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement,restore the surface of the easement,and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work,as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. 2. Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement as long as such use does not interfere with the easement rights granted to the Grantee. Grantor shall not,however,have the right to: a. Erect or maintain any buildings or structures within the easement;or b. Plant trees,shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage to or interfere with the utilities to be placed within the easement by the Grantee;or c. Develop,landscape,or beautify the easement area in any way which would unreasonably increase the costs to the Grantee of restoring the easement area and any private improvements therein. d. Dig,tunnel or perform other forms of construction activities on the property which would disturb the compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the right-of-way,or endanger the lateral support facilities. e. Blast within fifteen(15)feet of the right-of-way. o; I 4?7t:29,5i {t:3„ C:\WINWORD\FORMS\EASEMENT.DOC\ Page 1 FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 N m I I I This easement shall run with the land described herein,and shall be binding upon the parties,their heirs, successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. By this conveyance, Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, administrators and assigns forever. ,I I I IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this 7 day of NOU 19 5 7 ' I REPRESENTATIVE FORM OFACICNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING • s, ++iJr,, f I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Peter- LC� . �r,�1 -r•1,'1*r�. -PO W fib signed this instrument,on oath �kr" .•'r O w-v'.,c{t"%, stated that he/she/they was/ivere-authorized to execute the instrument and o � acknowledged it as the m e- i,b� and S fi I �: L V,4 at' Meft' of t ur .e.l. -©r i(11 it -� Ito be the free and voluntary act of such = y i F A' party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. JCL ale �� 1 C11./.1 1-Adl YJL/ %� ry Public in and for the State of Washington Ts4 '''nn.•,�". ,,,• ` Notary(Print) A Vll I 776ch mQG'iLPA'' My appointment expires: '7 f (O ' 9 k Dated: I 1-7. 97 i C:\WINWORD\FORMS\EASEMENT.DOC\ Page 2 1 FORM 03 0000Poh/CA2-21-97 • EXHIBIT"A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Must be stamped by a P.E.or L.S.) Easements for water facilities on Lot 8, Burlington Northern, a Binding Site Plan recorded under King County Recording Number 9206302696 as per Plat recorded in Volume 161 of Plats, pages 8 through 11, records of King County. Situated in the City of Renton,King County, Washington: Easement No. 1: Being 25-feet-wide, 12.50 feet either side of the following described centerline: BEGINNING at a point on the West line of said Lot 8 and the east line of Lind Avenue SW, said point being North 02°09'37" East, 243.00 feet from the Southwest corner of Lot 8; Thence South 87°50'23" East, 35.00 feet to the end of Easement No. 1. Easement No. 2: Being 20.00-feet-wide, 10.00 feet either side of the following described centerline: BEGINNING at a point on the North line of said Lot 8 and the South line of SW 34th Street, said point being North 87°50'23"West, 273.00 feet from the Northeast corner of Lot 8; Thence South 02°09'37" West 10.00 feet to the end of Easement No.es.? '1�r3 ov w s .c',vI tit At'�• orf "' . r,. 27505 rW I' �g�GISTS.- �ti$ `s1°NAL ElA,, V•`7 EXPIRES 5/2/? . I C:\WINWORD\FORMS\EASEMENT.DOC\ Page 3 FORM 03 0000Poh/CA2-21-97 I Map Exhibit , /A47°5v '23V 15e,.4 4 — � � � .�,,. 2?3 goo ` ¢ 5 2"0 9 1 37," 791) lD.od I 1 r . ti I L,L ___AfHl- . S87 0 23 I '35yea' 6 P N. ,�i V c v li . il M V" 0 • 3 li jj. a — — Air Seel le. C:IWINWORD\FORMSIEASEMENT.DOC\ Page 4 FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055-2189 Title: UTILITIES EASEMENT Property Tax Parcel Number: 125360-0020 Project File#: Home Base Street Intersection or Project Name: SW 34th Street&East Valley SA—9 6-0 2 2 Highway Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. HCWA Realty Corp. 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation The Grantor,as named above,for or and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to the above named Grantee,the following described property: Additional legal is on page 3 of this document. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A 15 ft wide Ptn Lot 2 CRLLA Rec Vol 106,P 180 Surveys, vreiKC Rec#9511299006 in S 30 T 23 N R 5 E W.M.in King County,Washington. That said Grantor(s),for and in consideration of mutual benefits,do by these presents,grant,bargain, sell, !Ed convey,and warrants unto the said Grantee,its successors and assigns,an easement for public utilities (including water, and wastewater)with necessary appurtenances under and through the following described property(the right-of-way)in King County,Washington,more particularly described on ge-1A Exhibits A and B. For the purpose of constructing,reconstructing,installing,repairing,replacing,enlarging,operating and maintaining below grade utilities and utility pipelines,including,but not limited to,water,sewer and storm drainage lines,together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings Following the initial construction of its facilities, Grantee may from time to time after ten(10)days prior written notice to Grantor construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The Grantee shall,upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement,restore the surface of the easement,and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work,as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in inunediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. 2. Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement as long as such use does not interfere with the easement rights granted to the Grantee. Grantor shall not,however,have the right to: a. Erect or maintain any buildings or structures within the easement;or b. Plant trees,shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage to or interfere with the utilities to be placed within the easement by the Grantee;or c. Develop,landscape,or beautify the easement area in any way which would unreasonably increase the costs to the Grantee of restoring the easement area and any private improvements therein. d. Dig,tunnel or perform other forms of construction activities on the property which would disturb the compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the right-of-way,or endanger the lateral support facilities. e. Blast within fifteen(15)feet of the right-of-way. *T7-oa4'3 7 Ari srs M1 C:\WINWORDWORMS\HMBS ESM.DOC t Page 1 0 M1 3. Grantee shall indemnify,defend and hold harmless Grantor and its officers,employees,agents,contractors and affiliates(collectively,"Indemnitees")from and against any and all causes of action,claims,debts,liens,damages, liabilities,losses and expenses,including,without limitation,attorney's fees and costs,which any Indemnitee may suffer in connection with,or in any way arising out of,this easement,the utility lines installed by Grantee and/or the activities of Grantee,its agents,employees,representatives,contractors and subcontractors upon the property covered by this easement or Grantor's adjacent property. This easement shall run with the land described herein,and shall be binding upon the parties,their heirs, successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors,administrators and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this'4A day of WO/ 1991 . • City of Renton TTCWA R tv Corp. /0 .0ll By: By: (1/11„/ Its : se anner Its: or , g p +�u Marilyn J. etersen, City Clerk Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF CALITORNVISS COUNTY OF ORANGE ) GG ., On this �C/', ,day of(/CMhP/! ,19 9 7,before me personally appeared � UP t(Je1 1 / to me known to C"'� be ,e o(/eA/ sa Ph/mMf of the corporation that executed the within instrument,and ackr owledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. /fee Notary Public 0.4 forth State of n-. It IA Notary(Print) 7�iT2rc/A .T� ���� �� � N My appointment expires: 371N e. '1 5 /'9%8 Dated: /V//a/9 7 it I j r 5881'St wrtp node vim • giviNkioarivo Olif sseAQ `rc{r.;;:iSW,F:J''•...'ift:i�v.i.�,ti�:'.:1'a.- :.':��`.'$?`%'i:JF:n ��L':5:......eci'• „v C:\WINWORD\FORMS\HMBS ESM.DOC\ Page 2 - • • • • Horton Dennis&Associates, Inc. .H A • Consulting Engineers,Planners & Surveyors II EXHIBIT A UTILITY EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIFTI Q N (HOME BASE PARCEL) THAT PORTION OF LOT 2, CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 106 OF SURVEYS. PAGE 180 UNDER RECORDING NO. • 9511299006, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON, LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 15.00 FEET IN WIDTH, HAVING 7.50 FEET OF SAID WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: � I COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2: THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF NORTH 87°50'47'WEST 165.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE NORTH 02`09'13' EAST 20.00 FEET: THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE NORTH 87'50'47' WEST 223.44 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 02'09'37• WEST 47.50 FEET TO THE TERMINUS OF THIS LINE DESCRIPTION. THE SIDE LINES OF SAID 15.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP TO LENGTHEN OR SHORTEN AS NECESSARY TO TERMINATE ON SAID NORTH LINE AND AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID POINT OF TERMINUS tic •! `apu•smalaanw a ..muq� y0. bt!to. g • .. ..t • ,Inn f 4[Q .s• u = iLAN9 - . j I t. =MIE O/2./ • • 320 Second Avenue South, Kirkland, Washington 98033, Phone (206) 822-f525, Fox (206) 821-8758 Kirkland • Wcna/chuu • Bunco • . - 9711140163 b ...//////// //„\�N..,,,,,!,, '' Lb',uie smu�a 0 e,owl c3gv� .wc�(-r) I. \ 5 . E - 4 •V '•• tt O j 4 �•h:.aa.,a,,u.,a,u/i nnnn:aia ..`. _`5" ,,!,. .,-. i aQ•s�% - t--•e.zz r•_Lt..o�s-L$r _1_� • U T� J_ pe • I • 7 '�� _7 I, • ii, i• d �C�_ _ _ Hr I I � _, °tPtij i � Hi t t a� ci- ,i • c, 41 La x S=31 - II, o t �"1 -q-LS �59I`A�.4 ) I o 1Ii� - ` • I I1I 4 Ill J4 j � I ,•r',.2Z ,OS ,- r' ,1�J 21.& \ ' '''''' j•, 1Sri-7 S• 1�5, _ . • • lo. ti lD k/ 9Z99� // l G Co RECOR" . ill Return Address: R ' d City Clerk's Office x City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055-2189 F 0 0 125360-0080-02 GOi BILL OF SALE Property Tax Parcel Number: 125380-0211-00 ro) Project File#:v1/ t-2285 Street Intersection: 201 SW 34th Street a, Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page . co CO G ranto r(s): Grantee(s): Irl, 1. Farwest Steel Corporation 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation 0)1 The Grantor,as named above,for,and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to the Grantee,as named above,the following described personal property now located at: ,.O I SW 3 y'A ST T . ,1 '31 L tr r. ca it 'D I e . W ATir IZ.M 41•.J q !D L 0 f o.ir DIY' (.4A-7- 2M,AtAi . r g 9't:3/A L v ES • q Ia 6ATEf> L-r&S A .FI C6 fdY D 2A Avr +SSEM 6 L l w S I S 1I 1°VG 5/-64114 1-I AJ& i J - I'-'O 4U SIj By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, administrators and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. -c-o.r uN-e-n%E -t-L C,Y\-12-v-t-ct- c - INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary eal ust be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS _ , COUNTY OF KING ) ` f� E 8U &21 I certify that I know or have satisfactory..evidence that .._Ja A` \vr � li� "tZ11C Wk signed this instrument and . NQ'� j►*�� ,� acknowledged it to b:�j er/their free and Joluntary act for the uses and purposes i * : �.�. . * ; mentioned in the instrument ii 1§;0,4% MUG : ! A - 1 .4.1\A417&; 50.JOKSik •�fyt71� Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. i ‘ W __ Notary(Print)��c_Q42 � - , �`��,��,,,;-- My appoint ent expires: e;— ��— �% Dated: Lk�- ...,Di Itg?—00, W CO 0 l0 Return Address: • 53 • City Clerk's Office CFI City of Renton RECEIVED , o 200 Mill Avenue South x Renton,WA 98055-2189 SEP 0 9 1997 E KING COUNTY RECORDER m Title: UTILITIES EASEMENT Property Tax Parcel Number: /,253 ff O [ID I O Project File 1I: Street Intersection or Project Name: FA2wc$T, sL Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. G.I. JOE'S Inc. , an Oregon 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation 2. Corporation !'1 The Grantor,as named above,for or and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to d" the above named Grantee,the following described personal property now located at: Additional legal is on page 9 of document. (Abbreviated legal description MUST go here.) C LEGAL DESCRIPTION: POI2.71 p u 6 P. Ld T ack. M A1° ie EC.L) -Oro 1 ti ✓ULLAt•t GO.� 10 0P PG41-.s Pis CT) See Attached Exhibit "A" T • H:\FORMS\KCRECORD\EASEMENT.DOC1 page 1 FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 • • That said Grantor(s),for and in consideration of mutual benefits,do by these presents,grant,bargain,sell, convey,and warrants unto the said Grantee,its successors and assigns,an easement for public utilities (including water,wastewater,and surface water)with necessary appurtenances over,under,through,across and upon the following described property(the right-of-way)in King County,Washington,more particularly described on page 1. (or if full legal is not on page 1--Exhibit A.) For the purpose of constructing,reconstructing,installing,repairing,replacing,enlarging,operating and maintaining utilities and utility pipelines,including,but not limited to,water,sewer and storm drainage lines, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor. Following the initial construction of its facilities, Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: I. The Grantee shall,upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement,restore the surface of the easement,and•any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work,as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in Immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. 2. Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement as long as such use does not interfere with the easement rights granted to the Grantee. • 4.4 Grantor shall not,however,have the right to: w/, a. Erect or maintain any buildings or structures within the easement;or b. Plant trees,shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage to or interfere with the utilities to be placed within the easement by the Grantee;or c. Develop,landscape,or beautify the easement arca in any way which would unreasonably increase the costs to the Grantee of restoring the easement area and any private improvements therein. d. Dig,tunnel or perform other forms of construction activities on the property which would disturb the compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the right-of-way,or endanger the lateral support facilities. • e. Blast within fifteen(15)feet of the right-of-way. • This easement shall run with the land described herein,arid shall be binding upon the parties,their heirs, successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors,administrators and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this I le"day of ilk 19 9 G.I. JOE'S, Inc. By- -V\---� , President • INDIV/ AL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box .STATE OF WASHINGTON )sS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that - signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires:_ Dated: H:\FORMS\KCRECORDIEASEMENTDOC1 Page 2 li • • INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: REPRESENTATIVE FORM OFACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING Qj I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument,on oath ri stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and of to be the free end voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT N a tat), j st .e within box XXXIBMMEMS5tX)SS State of Oregon ivi•%�•to VI,. ) County of Clackamas ��,�,`;•' • On this I{ —day of 014 YAK__ , 19(44,before me personally appeared • Norman Daniels ET, coto me known to cn 0 0 a be the !r`j pant . of the corporation that M a 3 executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said Instrument to be the free mExtpo �, �T and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein -0 P3F mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said Nz instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. K025 � . �� G.nhi �CJCV� • mr'r _o m Notary Public in and for the State of Oregon Z 1 IV Notary(Print)�g),�b fav- p_ Y717a • co • My appointment expires: 3—).P• -sje . Dated: (, — J(, ci H:\FORMSUCCRECORDIEASEMENT.DOC1 Page 3 FORM 03 00001bh/CA2-21-97 • EXHIBIT A UTILITY EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION (GI JOE'S PARCEL) THAT PORTION OF LOT 1, BURLINGTON NORTHERN BINDING SITE PLAN, PER MAP RECORDED IN VOLUME 161 OF PLATS, PAGES 8 THROUGH 11 INCLUSIVE, UNDER RECORDING NO. 9206302696, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 15.00 FEET IN WIDTH,HAVING 7.50 FEET OF SAID WIDTH ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF NORTH 87°50'47" WEST 165.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING 4-1 ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 02°09'13" EAST 20.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING Qom.' ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 87°50'47" WEST 223.44 FEET TO THE POINT OF O BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 02°09'3 7" EAST 48.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°09'3 7" .1 EAST 27.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 42°50'23" WEST 89.95 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 1 AND THE TERMINUS OF THIS LINE it DESCRIPTION. THE SIDE LINES OF SAID 15.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP TO LENGTHEN OF T' SHORTEN AS NECESSARY TO TERMINATE AT SAID SOUTH AND WESTERLY BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOT 1. ``<<riumummuw „m 1q Horton Dennis& Associates, Inc. G. b1IC 320 Second Avenue South ' Kirkland,Washington 98033-6687 c' .�► �WA y'• ,%1 (425)822-2525 . , 1) '7 a • 17872 Acy Q1GO 1°N4.LAND q� EXPIRES• 9/MIMIWW/MM/1 I ge.v. Fo2owlO wit.,%/ • • • • . . , - 9709180941 . . . ' • 1.'1rrp 1'V Zo- •1az • t11tarnf( l\\\W\1164‘W%\\1111r LL iszis SUL J n11 d�'t C$ � �►Wa(-3) ` � a t1 i • p ZL9LL i 0 .t.:4- / ;,1: . -,i; ...,e , . . . 11 • •;) S,� ,• a fl.t.1. 1� 7 --� <yet ~'S (It%% t� ZI n�lnri���11111,` N.��t>,osot.$1`1 till ' oo'S�\ /� J-+�'Fzz . c I iv..,LA--,,oS,Lsr . ��O boo \� I 3 �• „:1 III H i . _ .1 � 1 �,i i q iii ,f p• Q � � � -1- - --ti UA .s, , f-- u 1 �Q� IIIco ���a.LS. .'T,S�Zv ttV ) I I w • Sc �O"1 I III . I�I etr i I- II I • j � , . M,�4.z ,OS ,(.SjY ,I�l'z1j - August 19, 1996 Renton City Council Minutes Page 324 CAG: 96-096, Maplewood City Clerk reported bid opening on 8/06/96 for CAG-96-096, Maplewood Creek Sedimentation Basin Creek Sedimentation Basin Reconstruction; five bids; engineer's estimate Reconstruction, Walashek $284,904.67; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the Industrial & Marine low bidder, Walashek Industrial & Marine, in the amount of $318,496.44. Council concur. CAG: 96-098, S 6th St City Clerk reported bid opening on 8/13/96 for CAG-96-098, S. 6th St. Sewer Sewer Replacement, B&L Replacement; six bids; engineer's estimate $237,663.46; and submitted staff Utility recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, B&L Utility, Inc., in the amount of $237,697.01. Council concur. CAG: 96-099, Tobin City Clerk reported bid opening on 8/14/96 for CAG-96-099, Tobin St./Lake St/Lake Ave S Storm Ave. S. Storm System Improvements; five bids; engineer's estimate System Improvements, $300,010.00; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the D.A. Zulauga Const low bidder, D.A. Zuluaga Construction, Inc., in the total amount of $332,867.56. Council concur. Annexation: Maplewood City Clerk requested approval of proposed appointments to the Maplewood Heights, Voters Pamphlet Heights Annexation Election Voters' Pamphlet Statement Committees, as Committee Appointments follows: Proponent Committee - Bill Evans, Scott Brown and Sam, Throm; Opponent Committee - Rod Dembowski, Ray Griffin and Mary Ellen Hamblin. Council concur. Transportation: Annual City Clerk submitted annual certification of State highway routes within the Certification of State City of Renton as provided by the Washington State Department of Highway Routes in Transportation (WSDOT). Information. Renton Executive: Farwest Steel Executive Department recommended the passage of a Planning Jurisdiction Corp Tax-Exempt Approval resolution on behalf of the Washington Economic Development Economic Development Finance Authority, to facilitate the issuance of tax-exempt economic Revenue Bonds development revenue bonds not to exceed $6,000,000 for Farwest Steel L-Q Ps - Corporation's planned construction of a manufacturing and warehouse facility in Renton at SW 34th between Lind Ave. SW and East Valley Road. Refer to 6Ps �� b Finance Committee. Human Services: 1997- Human Services Division submitted proposed interlocal agreements with King 1999 CDBG and HOME County to receive Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Funding, King County Partnership Investment Program funding for 1997-1999 in the total estimated amount of $434,838. Refer to Community Services Committee. Annexation: Maplewood Planning & Technical Services Division recommended adoption of an Heights, Election ordinance requesting an election be scheduled for November 5, 1996 on the proposed Maplewood Heights Annexation, contingent on and subsequent to approval of the annexation by the King County Boundary Review Board. Council concur in the adoption of the ordinance and refer the fiscal analysis aspect of the annexation to the Committee of the Whole. (See page 327 for ordinance.) Vacation: Bronson Way Planning & Technical Services Division submitted appraisal in the amount of NE (RAMAC/Dan Shane, $21,825.00 for the Bronson Way NE street vacation (VAC-94-006; petitioner VAC-94-006) RAMAC, Inc./Dan Shane), and recommended approval and that compensation due from the petitioner be set at one-half the appraised value. Council concur. CAG: 93-031, Houser Way Transportation Systems Division requested approval of Supplement No. 10 to Relocation, Entranco CAG-93-031, consultant agreement with Entranco, Inc. for the Houser Way • CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL • AI#: 1,-c SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: August 19. 1996 ;Dept/DivBoard Executive Department Staff Contact Susan Carlson AGENDA STATUS: Consent X SUBJECT: Public Hearing Washington Economic Development Finance Authority Correspondence... i Tax Exempt/Taxable Economic Development Revenue Ordinance Bond Program Resolution Old Business EXHIBITS: New Business Letter dated August 7, 1996 from WEDFA Study Session Resolution Other RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Refer to Finance Committee Legal Dept Finance Dept Other FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required 0 Transfer/Amendment....0 Amount Budgeted 0 Revenue Generated 0 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Farwest Steel Corporation is planning to construct a rebar and custom steel parts manufacturing and warehouse facility in Renton. They intend to fmance this project through the issuance of WEDFA's tax-exempt/taxable nonrecourse economic development revenue bonds. As part of the issuance process,the Washington Economic Development Finance Authority would like the Renton City Council,as the planning jurisdiction,to pass a Planning Jurisdiction Approval resolution on behalf of the Washington Economic Development Finance Authority to issue tax-exempt taxable economic development revenue bonds. a 'tarp J.SS.T ,•1•i:::y 8•Z 1889 STATE OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY 2001 6th Ave., Suite 2700 • Seattle, Washington 98121 • (206)464-6282 • (FAX)(206)464-5868 August 7, 1996 Ms. Marilyn J. Petersen Clerk ;.T i C.'•, City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 . `P,K'S OFF!C•E Re: Washington Economic Development Finance Authority(WEDFA) - Tax- Exempt/Taxable Economic Development Revenue Bond Programs $6,000,000 (approx.)Farwest Steel Corporation Project Dear Ms. Petersen: Farwest Steel Corporation is planning to construct a rebar and custom steel parts manufacturing and warehouse facility in Renton. They intend to finance this project through the issuance of WEDFA's tax-exempt/taxable nonrecourse economic development revenue bonds. Mr. David Forester, VP Finance at Farwest Steel would be happy to provide you with any further information that you might find helpful regarding the project. His telephone number is: (541) 683-9221. As part of the issuance process, we would like the Renton City Council as the planning jurisdiction, to pass a Planning Jurisdiction Approval (resolution), attached, in behalf of the Washington Economic Development Finance Authority (WEDFA) to issue tax-exempt taxable economic development revenue bonds. We are planning to issue the bonds toward the end of September. It would greatly assist our timing if the City Council could consider this approval at their next meeting. 3 Ms. Marilyn J. Petersen Clerk August 7, 1996 Page two Please let me know how we can work together to facilitate this process. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. My telephone number is: (206) 389-2559. I look forward to working with you on this project. Sincerely yours, I 46014 • Jonathan A. Hayes Revenue Bond Programs Manager cc: D. Forester - Farwest Steel RESOLUTION NO. W-96-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE WASHINGTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY DECLARING OFFICIAL INTENT TOWARD THE ISSUANCE OF NONRECOURSE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS IN ONE OR MORE SERIES IN A MAXIMUM AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $6,000,000 AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INDEMNIFICATION AND COMPENSATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE WASHINGTON . ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY AND FARWEST STEEL CORPORATION (the "Borrower"). WHEREAS, the Washington. Economic Development Finance Authority (the "Issuer") is established as a public body corporate and politic, with perpetual corporate succession, constituting an instrumentality of the State of Washington authorized and empowered by the provisions of RCW Chapter 43.163 (the "Act") to issue nonrecourse revenue bonds for the purpose of financing economic development activities as defined in the Act; and WHEREAS, the Borrower has informed the Issuer that it wishes to acquire, construct, equip, and improve, the manufacturing facilities to be located in Renton, King County, Washington, as more fully described in Exhibit A attached hereto •and incorporated herein (the "Site"), all of which are located within the territorial limits of the State of Washington, and the Borrower has requested the Issuer to issue nonrecourse revenue bonds (the "Bonds") as special obligations of the Issuer in a maximum amount not to exceed six million dollars ($6,000,000) pursuant to the Act to, carry into effect the acquisition, construction, equipping, and improving or real and personal property at the Site to be used in the manufacturing facilities of the Borrower, as more fully described in Exhibit A hereto (the "Project"), to loan the proceeds of the Bonds to finance Project costs, as defined in the Act; and WHEREAS, the Bonds, when and if issued, would be payable solely out of the special fund or funds established for their repayment and would be secured by a financing document,,as defined by the Act; and WHEREAS, a form of agreement designated as an "Indemnification and Compensation Agreement" has been prepared setting forth the respective agreements and undertaking of the Issuer and the Borrower with respect to the Bonds and the Project; and WHEREAS, it is considered necessary and desirable for the best interest of the Issuer that the Indemnification and Compensation Agreement be executed for and on the behalf of the Issuer; and Resolution No. W-96-008 Page 1 of 6 WHEREAS, the Indemnification and Compensation Agreement requires the Borrower to pay all reasonable and necessary costs incurred by the Issuer in connection with the Bonds or in connection with the Project; and WHEREAS, the Issuer finds that the Project constitutes economic development activities, as defined under the Act; and WHEREAS, it is intended that this resolution shall constitute a declaration of official intent to reimburse Project expenditures within the meaning of Sections 1.103- (8)(T)(a)(5) and 1.150-2 of the Federal Income Tax Regulations. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Washington Economic Development Finance Authority as follows: Section 1. It is hereby determined that (a) the acquisition, construction and installation of the Project and their operation as an economic development facility; (b) the issuance of the bonds of the Issuer in one or more series and in a maximum amount not to exceed $6,000,000, to finance costs of the Projects, such total costs to be financed by the Bonds presently estimated to be approximately $6,000,000; and (c) the execution and delivery of such contracts and agreements with the Issuer as are necessary to provide for the payment by the Issuer of amounts sufficient to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds, together with certain costs of.the Issuer, will all be in furtherance of the Act. Section 2. Subject to the conditions listed in Section 3 below, including such other conditions as in the judgement of the Issuer and bond counsel are necessary to insure the validity of the Bonds and the tax-exempt status of the Bonds, it is the intent of the Issuer to proceed toward the issuance and sale of the Bonds pursuant to the provisions of the Act. Nothing in this resolution shall be construed as legally binding the Issuer to authorize, issue, or sell the Bonds. Section 3. The authorization, issuance, and sale of the Bonds by the Issuer are subject to the following conditions: _ (a) the Borrower shall have caused secured a bond purchase agreement (the "Bond Purchase Agreement") from an Accredited Investor, as such term is defined in 17 CFR 230.501(a), acceptable to the Issuer, for the purchase of the Bonds; (b) the Borrower shall enter into such contracts and loan agreements with the Issuer as shall be necessary to secure payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds as when the same shall come due and payable; Resolution No. W-96-008 Page 2 of 6 (c) on or before two (2) years from the date hereof(or such later date as shall be mutually satisfactory to the Issuer and the Borrower) the Issuer and the Borrower shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the contracts and agreements referred to in paragraph (b) of this Section 3; (d) the Issuer shall have received a preliminary opinion of bond counsel that, with certain customary exceptions, the Bonds may be issued as tax-exempt obligations pursuant to the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; (e) the Issuer shall have received an allocation of the State ceiling on private activity bonds imposed by Section 146 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 in an amount equal to the aggregate face amount of the Bonds, and shall have allocated such amount to the Bonds; (f) the Issuer shall have received evidence that the county, city, or town within whose planning jurisdiction the Project lies has approved the Project and the Bonds; and (g) such other conditions as in the judgement of the Issuer and bond counsel are necessary to insure the validity of the Bonds and the tax-exempt status of the Bonds. Section 4. The proper officials of the Issuer are hereby authorized to take such further action as.is necessary to carry out the intent and purposes hereof under the terms and conditions stated herein and in compliance with the applicable provisions of law. • Section 5. That it is deemed necessary and advisable that the Indemnification and Compensation Agreement be approved and executed for and on behalf of the Issuer. Section 6. That an Indemnification and Compensation Agreement by and between the Issuer and the Borrower be, and the same is hereby, approved and authorized and the Chair of the Issuer is hereby authorized to execute the Indemnification and Compensation Agreement on behalf of the Issuer. Section 7. Each Bond, when and if issued, shall substantially state the following language on the face thereof: THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE ISSUER HEREUNDER SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE A DEBT, LIABILITY, OBLIGATION, OR PLEDGE OF THE FAITH AND CREDIT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, OF ANY MUNICIPALITY, OR OF ANY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, QUASI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SUBDIVISION, OR AGENCY OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, OR TO PLEDGE ANY OR ALL OF THE FAITH AND CREDIT OF ANY•OF THESE ENTITIES. NEITHER THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, THE ISSUER, ANY MUNICIPALITY, OR ANY OTHER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, QUASI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SUBDIVISION, OR AGENCY OF THE Resolution No. W-96-008 Page 3 of 6 STATE OF WASHINGTON IS OBLIGATED TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OR THE INTEREST THEREON. NO TAX FUNDS OR GOVERNMENTAL REVENUE MAY BE USED TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OR INTEREST THEREON. NEITHER ANY OR ALL OF THE FAITH AND CREDIT NOR THE TAXING POWER OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, THE ISSUER, IF ANY, OR ANY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, QUASI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SUBDIVISION, OR AGENCY THEREOF IS PLEDGED TO THE PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL OR OF THE INTEREST ON THE BONDS. Section 8. This Resolution shall be effective after its adoption. • ADOPTED by the Washington Economic Development Finance Authority this 23rd day of July, 1996. WASHINGTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY Chair • • Resolution No. W-96-008 Page 4 of 6 • EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND SITE The Project will consist of: A custom steel fabrication and rebar manufacturing plant to be located on SW 34th between Lind Avenue and East Valley Road, Renton, King County. • Resolution No. W-96-008 Page 5 of 6 • • CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Secretary of the Washington Economic Development Finance Authority (herein called the "Issuer"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY: 1. That the attached Resolution No. W-96-008 (herein called the "Resolution") is a true and correct copy of a resolution of the Issuer as finally adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Issuer held on the 23rd day of July, 1996, and duly recorded in my office. 2. That said meeting was duly convened and held in all aspects in accordance with law, and, to the extent required by law and the by-laws of the Issuer, due and proper notice of such meeting was given; that a legal quorum was present throughout the meeting and a legally sufficient number of members of the Washington Economic Development Finance Authority voted in the proper manner for the adoption of the Resolution; that all other requirements and proceedings incident to the proper adoption of the Resolution have been duly fulfilled, carried out, and otherwise observed; and that I am authorized to execute this certificate. IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of July, 1996. ,9 Secretary Resolution No. W-96-008 Page 6 of 6 The i'EriEG -D7 'EGOS i]0 riir Transpoi Group DATE I 12..L.ticuo JOB NO. �l�/�f (FLU7, I -^,oD 14335 N.E.24TH STREET SUITE 201 • BELLEVUE,WA 98007 ATTENTIONV(/-I�I (206)641.3881 • FAX (206) 747.3688 RE: V ev\v\,.cei- 14vw1Iv1J TO CtT1 oC- - ON) P1)-NN11\)6, 1DT. J � .. 2 oa IA , R 1-v-e.vkut so U-}ti. 0 Re� -okn, w(1 q ?0- -s- Ap 2� /996 DELI-Tit rs'0: PtANNI _ WE ARE SENDING YOU 94 Attached CIUnder separate cover via the following IteM( VTON NG ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION l— ,I+Ct(0 Le+'er— no cel R s6- S I l r`;p 6-e iAg rig.i't\()V1 LA—Zy—aio CPI 1 ct►v +- a." THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution - ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints xFor review and comment ❑ El FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS "Z'e vi Q Ssi review - cc So w-e_ Ca v. Cl,niIS c a�' . / c p kas-p c(--,A)0,-,AC� cop 1- `-) c( __1T I'vd v�q a v. `�- C t rS Q)f `rkQ\t-- f'@.v`ce�1 . LJ CtAlJ COPY TO C 1't✓V\- IV\O ra q✓" - —.--- SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at on Transportation and Traffic Engineering PLANNING • DESIGN 11e Transpo Group April 24, 1996 TG: 96240.00 RECEiVED Ms. Jennifer Henning, City of Renton Planning Department AP I? Mr. Clint Morgan, City of Renton Development Review " it 2 6 1996 200 Mill Avenue South DEVELOr Renton, WA 98055 CITY lor OF A pi A., riL SUBJECT: FAR WEST STEEL FACILITY -- TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATE Dear Jennifer& Clint, This letter presents an alternative approach to the City of Renton's estimate of the likely trip generation for the proposed Farwest Steel facility. Typically, estimates of total daily project generated traffic volumes are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation, 5th Edition, 1991. The trip rates and equations in the ITE manual are based on empirical observations for many uses located throughout the country. However, since little trip generation data is available for truck distribution facilities, trip generation estimates should be based on data from similar facilities when available. As discussed in Trip Generation, actual data from similar local facilities is preferred where available. After discussing the city's trip generation estimate with Clint Morgan, we understand that the proposed facility was assumed as a "warehouse" use in the ITE Trip Generation manual. Clint explained that the "warehouse" use was the most appropriate use due to the lack of data for other similar facilities such as truck distribution centers. Utilising the size of proposed facility, the trip generation was estimated using the trip rate for a warehouse (4.88 daily trips/1,000 sf of building). Assuming 66,000 sf of building space, 322 daily trip were estimated for the proposed Farwest Steel facility. In order to ensure an accurate estimate of the likely trip generation for the proposed Farwest Steel facility, trip generation estimates from a similar facility should be utilized. Since Farwest Steel has a similar steel distribution facility located in Seattle, trip generation estimates for the proposed facility in Renton should be based on actual driveway counts or trip generation estimates from the Seattle facility. Farwest Steel has completed an initial analysis of existing trips generated at it's Seattle facility. The results indicate that a total of 60 to 80 trips occur during an average weekday. Thus, since Farwest estimates that the proposed facility would generate less than one-third of the daily trips estimated by the City of Renton, we suggest that the trip generation be estimated from actual driveway counts or trip generation estimates at the Seattle facility. An accredited traffic count consultant would be utilized to perform the counts over a period of three weekdays. The daily counts could then be adjusted based on any difference in size of the existing facility as compared to the proposed facility. Any other adjustments to reflect seasonal variation would be made to reflect"average" conditions. This trip generation estimate would then be utilized to determine Farwest Steel's daily trip generation impact. \JLS\96240L1 The TRANSPO Group,Inc. 14335 N.E.24th Street,Suite 201 Bellevue,Washington 98007 FAX:206/747-3688 206/641-3881 r Ms. Jennifer Henning The Mr. Clint Morgan Transpo April 24, 1996 Page 2 Group Once you have had a chance to review our alternate trip generation approach, please give me a call at 641-3881 so we discuss further. Sincerely, The TRANSPO Group, Inc. actifhtimi Jeff Schramm Transportation Engineer cc: Bart Treece, Horton Dennis &Associates, Inc. Dave Forester, Farwest Steel JLS\9624OL1 ',17.14 .1• a a CITY OF RENTON OLE t. .......... — ,_44/ Drt- Q„,, --w,,, ,.-., ,, _,,... Planning/Building/Public Works — , ,. hut)Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 17 4;PR 0/ eVt ICVrillFZIEltg 49 6 AP 1 1'7'9 6 ....-.1.7.wf t • • PB METER '4- , A 71540761 ".TiI1I . le 0VI , CIN.j . Burlington Northern Railroad Properties,Inc. 1011 Western Avenue, Suite#700 1;,-%' Seattle, WA 9?11011- ___- 98104303R 1395 04/19/96 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND i :BURLINGTON ENVIRONMENT 955 POWELL AVE SW i RENTON WA 98055-2908 11 ' r- -•---4-- ( 9661 r Hilithildhlidshil!huh;.titvillilliiis.01.....110 % CITY OF RENTON • eel " Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 16, 1996 I . Mr.Barton Treece Horton Dennis&Associates, Inc. 320 Second Avenue South " Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: Farwest Steel Facility Project No. LUA-96-022,SA,ECF Dear Mr.Treece: This letter is to inform you that the comment and/or appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project.' . No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 277-6186. For the Environmental Review Committee, �1 .;ennifer Toth Henning -611141 Project Manager cc: Burlington Northern Railroad Properties, Inc./Owner Powell Orillia Associates, Inc./Owner FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,25%post consumer " CITY 01' RENTON "LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg.Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • April 16, 1996 • • Mr. Barton Treece Horton Dennis&Associates, Inc. 320 Second Avenue South Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: Farwest Steel Facility Project No. LUA-96-022,SA,ECF Dear Mr.Treece: This letter is to inform you that the comment and/or appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. • No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 277-6186. For the Environmental Review Committee, WeA444'14/‘9 nnifer Toth Henning • Project Manager cc: Burlington Northern Railroad Properties, Inc./Owner Powell Orillia Associates, Inc./Owner • FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,25%post consumer Washington State Northwest Region Department:of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Sid Morrison' P.O. Box 330310 • Secretary of Transportation, Seattle,WA 9813 1V�LOPMENT PLANNING (206)440-4000 CITY OF D r\11-n" DATE: April 9, • 1996 APR 121996 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning City of Renton, Project Manager RECEIVED 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA• 98055 Subject: SR 167 MP 24 . 15 CS 1766 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-Farwest Steel Facility File No. LUA-96-022, SA,ECF 0.714400(11 / FROM: Robert A. Josephson, PE, Manager of Planning &. Local Coordination . Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Ave. North, MS 122 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance for the Farwest Steel which, is located at SW 34th Street, between Valley Road and Lind Avenue. Our responseis checked below. We have reviewed the subject document and have no comments . 'The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. X The State recommends that a traffic study be prepared to analyze the state intersections that are impacted by ten or more of the project' s generated peak hour trips and also determine what mitigation measures, if any, would be required. If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter at 440- 4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section. VE:ve filename - • FROM :WSOOT NW REGION OPS TO 2fdb 2-ere i4`�b 1�7b•VJ`�—u7 ¢+<•ocr ^ + "�-- \i • � Washington State Northwest Reglon AI Department of 'Transportation 1b/UU Dayton Amu nun,Nnr1h P n (fox 330310 SW Morrison t'milk!,WA 9(1133 9710 ;kx;retary cif 1 ranc;r,nrtAi,ir f;Wos)MM0_41x1U »VELOPMENT PLANNINr- (,ITV ir/',n' DATE: Apr.i ] 9, 1996 qpR 0 91996 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning City of Renton, Project Manager RECEIVED 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Subject: SR 167 MP 24 . 15 CS 1766 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-Farwest Steel Facility File No. LUA-96-022,SA,ECF FROM: Robert A. Josephson, PE, Manager of Planning & Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Ave. North, MS 122 PO Box 330310 • Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance for the Farwest Steel which, in located at SW 34th Street, between Valley Road and Lind Avenue. Our response is checked below. We have reviewed the subject document and have no comments . The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. _ X The State recommends that a traffic study be prepared to analyze the state intersections that are impacted by ten or more of the project's generated peak hour trips and also determine what mitigation meanures, if any, would be required. If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter at 440- 4664 or Vickic Erickson at. 440-4915 of my Developer Services section. VE.ve • filename • • Po6t-It"brand fax transmittal memo 7671 b of popes wr.-.J. v AIMIll o. o. 'I / el Dopl. Phono I (� - / ( iogmipggimgiugoggfgggiiaigggsgsimmsksoga CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIUNG On the 2-'14‘ day of Avpvel , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing . • eein8 IDe_c-%%1Vvas documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing • 13aotn lawrk%inak-Attl notrfke.v1A—QoAkft akct Ov A"Szoc-tgte-",4 • • (Signature of Sender) SavNattx_ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 3 D K. cc&---6_- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for tt:te,,,''t,, §4..and-ipurposes mentioned in the instrument. c;) Dated: - 16 c-7)z/fu C p A.) - gt; - - • Notary Piplic in an f r the State of Wa.StOekcit,01',,y,1 • Notary rint) 4-&-4-/21:77- J My appointment expires: 479/9, Project Name: WeV Project Number: ego ..022 NOTARY.DOC 03/25/1996 17:06 2068228758 H D A PAGE 01 Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. HDA f � f61y �� Consulting Engineers, Planners & Surveyors 5 FAX COVER O� DATE: 3-t/ -94 TIME: TO: ‘,4f COMPANY: 44 0/ •,04-7 ,FAX #:_ 07.44 : FROM: pt OUR FAX #: 206-822-8758 OPERATOR:- The following document (including this cover sheet) is _ pages. / -41-444 Agle444d0-1 "941rEt4 45-11 ?- / VI ri a 7M 444, Apell aa/a 7 .e.a..wead 4.4 ' 1141114r A4P-Apy. OP) ALA awe__ Aljed,a• A11114,-wheihid_r If any of these pages are not legible or you do not receive all the pages, please call the telecomunlcations operator as soon as possible. ` 320 Second Avenue South. Kirkland. Washington 98033-6687• g Phone: (206) 822-2525 •Fat: (206)822-8758 !�— �• 1 16 MAl�1ZER�a�47�" —CURB CUT I EW 6' SIDEWALK \� TELMH (� . ``: _ ; s-x WV [imam) 400.15. -I-- 117.1o) : : 4417..o J 6 _ _- _---_----_—_ _ -- �� Ls. -I- t 10' LANOSCA@E Je [�oo� C I CONNECT TO Ex U11UTY ESMT. Q~' ! = I i I SANITARY SEWER / \ a STUB-OUT 4' ELEVATED _. o 1! - } 22-50 FZ11 I �Y z I' + 11esoF+ 14 i + : 1 A 12 au I'1 N A !'� c HOUSE TYPE I CB ) \ 1 =0 A A ) / PROPOSED4 SAN. SEWER (rYPICAL)16_rIP : r MAIN 1. MIN. ram` _ I• M1=1) i.- --v, ____.- _ --N. ". JJ ., 1 il ,23.0., ,.....- _ _ .:., . ..... -....,,.,... b 4 I i I if D N C /---- - - I iiVi<'1 a• �'� li i il�{ TRU B Y _...- $ �/ a $ / /1// .„,, .7, .A ....., ..... ,„... /t .- 40 SANI ARY SEWER SER A AS REQ'D /i' ~ ( A-CH. PLANS) 10.UTI D a EASE T' T SA rs i r% < , / 30'RAILRC J 1 1 F< 16. v../ I. / t : ' EASEMENT . ''. 4 6 .6.' / 144, 411r niT /h,.. iii- :a ::;-i!::;, aS0 Sq FT'P.1..i ','. ,.::;:-::•:•::: ,IA _-. --\/ 0/ / • /i L i . , • / ... ,.,...- n + /TEMP. ® SERVICE �- / . ,\ -I V TH CLEANOUT • S I1 ME • / / // 1 a J i. PROPOSED SAN. D• WA ' ��/ 1 \ MANHOLE _ /' /D/ PROPOSED 1-1/2� IRR METER, AND DOUBLE WATER , \ PROPOSED a' PVC SAN A' / '�/ IN VAULT SEWER SERVICE • 2.00A MIN. t ] 40.p/ 04, eroa/iipefeetiX fPfe ,.,,, ., ..cp.-_.. ..w.- 44e ., ...,- 4e,zz, Iliefes77411,4, e- --. :--7-.11314:= 2, r....90 00 SQ. "OP j/ FUTURE 6 ® _. /'/� PROPOSED 12" D.I. WAT• CO 1---m-• .!! // 2 - ,r } N87.50'47"W t— t 517.58. _N6 1 _ 1 A - I, CITY OF RENTON Report DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS & ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& Decision ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE March 19, 1996 • Project Name Farwest Steel Facility Applicant Horton Dennis&Associates, Inc. (Mr. Barton Treece) File Number LUA-096-022,SA,ECF Project Manager Jennifer Toth Henning Project Description The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval (SA) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) for the development of a vacant 5.63 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building, a 660 square foot temporary office facility, and a 2,700 square foot office building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A total of up to 79 parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. Project Location SW 34th Street, between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue. Exist. Bldg. Area sf N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area -' Phase 1 -66,660 sf sf Phase 2- 32,250 Site Area 5.63 acres Total Building Area sf Total - 99,910 sf ..„,.., , .„, a .a...ter..,.. i 4.4 ' ,1_1 _ ;..... • a! Y' ! a 1 9 1 1 �i �1�A b��I i 1 1 i ! i ! I 'Way i ' jIX/ 4LJ__ • ? - �� .- z.... 1 ii al piti-L .... .. .. ' zry ,, I rV . J 1J '` -- mr,, Q IP0 , .,„, 6=1a 1 / Farwest Steel Facility - LUA-96-022, SA,ECF Page 2 Part One: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant is proposing to develop approximately one-half of vacant site within the Valley portion of the City with a steel distribution center. The site is located on Southwest 34th Street between the East Valley Highway and Lind Avenue in an area that is presently being developed with a variety of commercial/service and industrial uses. The 5.63 acre site is irregularly shaped due to the configuration of existing railroad easements. Development would occur on the east portion of the subject parcel, the west portion would remain in native vegetation. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation is Employment Area-Industrial (EAI) and the site is zoned Medium Industrial (IM). The proposed use is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and is permitted in the IM Zone. Farwest Steel would locate a steel distribution center on the property. Plate, beam, channel and other structural steel in bulk quantities would be delivered by Burlington Northern Railroad (approximately 30% to 40%) and by truck. Generally, the bulk product would arrive by rail or truck, be unloaded inside the warehouse by gantry crane or forklift. The facility would be used to store the materials for the purpose of selling to manufacturers, fabricators, contractors, etc. Some cutting of materials would occur on-site to fill customer's orders to their specifications, and then the material would be loaded in trucks for delivery. Under the applicant's proposal, development would occur in two phases. Phase 1 would consist of the development of a 63,300 square foot.warehouse, 660 square foot temporary office, 2,700 square foot office building, rail spur line, asphalt loading and maneuvering areas, and parking lots for up to 79 vehicles. Phase 2 would result in the construction of a 32,250 square foot warehouse addition. Phase 1 is anticipated to occur beginning in the Spring of 1996. Phase 2 may occur soon after completion of Phase 1, or be delayed several months or longer. Construction of the project would take about 12 to 15 months from installation of erosion control measures and pre-load through completion. The applicant is seeking environmental review and Administrative Site Plan approval for both phases at this time. The warehouse would be constructed of 12-foot high tilt-up concrete walls with pre-formed metal panels above. Building height would be 43 feet at the top of the column wall and approximately 51 feet at the highest point of the roofline. The two office buildings would probably be modular structures installed on the site, with the smaller temporary office constructed adjacent the warehouse, and the 2,700 square foot office on the southeast portion of the property. All structures would be of a neutral color. Up to 79 parking spaces would be provided to serve employees, customers and vendors. The warehouse would employ warehouse staff, salespersons, truck drivers and administrative personnel. Hours of operation would range from Sunday at 11:00 pm through Friday at 11:00 pm. Office hours would be from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Monday through Friday. Warehouse operations would occur on a shift schedule -- day (8:00 am - 5:00 pm), swing (4:00 pm to 12 am) and graveyard (12:00 am to 8:00 am). Sixteen employees would work the warehouse day shift, four employees would work swing, and three would work graveyard. Twelve employees would work in the offices. Deliveries destined for areas outside of the local area would leave the distribution center in the morning prior to the AM peak and would utilize major transportation routes including 1-5, 1-405 and SR 167. Local deliveries would use the same major roads for deliveries beyond the Renton/Kent geographic area. Local trucks would return for a second run during the day. Farwest Steel Facility LUA-96-022, SA,ECF Page 3 Part Two: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1) Earth Impacts The project site is flat with a maximum slope estimated at 1%. Fill was placed on the site during the 1970's, but no development has occurred and the site is covered with native grasses. The site is located outside of the 100-year floodplain. The proposal would include the import of 20,000 cubic yards of fill and pre-load material from local borrow pits to fill and grade the site for the proposed steel distribution center. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical engineering report prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. The report discusses existing surface, soils, groundwater, and seismic hazard conditions of the site, and recommends construction methods. The geo-technical report also discusses the relatively high floor loadings that are expected (possibly 800 to 1,000 pounds per square foot), and the fact that the applicant intends to utilize a spread footing foundation. In addition, since overhead rail cranes would be used in the facility for the interior transport of materials and products, the report discussed the differential settlement, since cranes have a low tolerance for differential settlement. Provided that the report recommendations are followed, the geo-tech report concludes that there are no geotechnical constraints that would preclude construction of the proposed steel distribution center. 4 Soil erosion could result during rain and/or wind storms that occur during the construction phase of the project. However, the impacts would be short-term in nature, and associated with construction. Furthermore, the applicant would implement temporary erosion control and sedimentation control measures (TESC) to minimize these potential impacts. • Mitigation Measures None required. Standard Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control methods would be required as conditions of the construction and building permits. Policy Nexus N/A 2) Air Impacts Impacts to air quality can be anticipated both during construction and during operation of the facility. Impacts during construction would include exhaust from construction equipment and dust from exposed soils. After construction the impacts would be associated with exhaust from vehicles used on the site, and those owned by employees and customers. The applicant has proposed mitigation measures to reduce or control emissions or impacts to air quality, particularly during construction activities. Dust produced by construction would be reduced with techniques such as spraying with dust suppressants. Exposed areas would be covered with suitable groundcover to prevent wind erosion. Mud control measures would be implemented to control tracking of soils onto streets by trucks. In addition, street cleaning on a daily basis is proposed. Farwest Steel Facility LUA-96-022,SA,ECF Page 4 A Construction Mitigation Plan would be required as part of the construction permit application that discusses plans to limit construction relative transport during peak travel times and requires techniques to limit and control dust and soil impacts associated with construction activity. The exhaust from vehicles is regulated by existing State law and while it would have a slight impact on regional air quality, it is not considered to warrant additional mitigation measures. Mitigation Measures None required. Policy Nexus N/A 3) Water Impacts A wetlands assessment was conducted for the subject parcel. While wetlands have been identified on the adjacent parcel occupied by Home Base, no wetlands were identified for the subject site. Mitigation Measures None required. Policy Nexus N/A 4) Surface Water Impacts. Development of the vacant site would result in the construction of new impervious surfaces that would cover up to 76% of the existing site area upon completion of both phases of project construction. On-site stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces would be collected and directed to the City's stormwater system eventually draining into Springbrook Creek, which flows into the Black River. A preliminary drainage report has been submitted for the proposed development, and staff have requested some revisions and additional information. The runoff release rates would need to be consistent with the peak rate of existing site conditions and with City requirements. The applicant will need to provide final plans for a stormwater detention system and water quality treatment facilities in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual, as adopted by the City of Renton. Mitigation Measures None required, beyond those required by applicable-codes. Policy Nexus N/A 5) Transportation Impacts The project site is located on the south side of SW 34th Street and east of Lind Avenue, immediately north of the Home Base site. The proposed project would be accessed from SW 34th via a driveway located on the northeast side of the site. A second driveway on the southwest portion of the property would provide access to Lind Avenue. Traffic trips are anticipated to increase with the proposal, but would be limited to delivery and employee trips. The applicant estimates a total of 58 average daily trips associated with the facility, (16 delivery and 42 employee) based on historic data for similar truck terminal facilities. City staff have estimated that up to 322 new trips could be added. Further evaluation will determine the applicable trip rate. New trips are subject to a Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75 per new average daily trip Farwest Steel Facility LUA-96-022, SA,ECF Page 5 Mitigation Measures The applicant shall be required to pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. This fee is due at the time of the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus Traffic Mitigation Fee: Resolution 3100, Ordinance 4527, SEPA. 6) Aesthetics Impacts The steel distribution center would have a roof height of 43 to 51 feet. The building configuration, height and location of facilities would have;no significant impact on views or signage of existing structures. Landscaping proposed for the site would include street trees along SW 34th Street, perimeter landscaping utilizing native and ornamental trees and shrubs along the existing rail lines and extensive groundcover planting on the southwest portion of the site. Ornamental landscaping is proposed on the south and east sides of the office structure would further enhance the site aesthetics. Since the site is located in the Valley area, a minimum of 2% of the site must be landscaped with native materials to provide wildlife habitat. The applicant is proposing that approximately 40% of the site be retained in native grasses. In addition, native and ornamental planting provided exceed Code requirements and would provide for consolidatedareas of wildlife habitat. Mitigation Measures None required. Policy Nexus N/A 7) Police and Fire Departments Impacts: The Police Department reports a large number of commercial burglaries and thefts of construction materials in the area over the last 1-1/2 years. It is recommended that any and all building materials be secured when not in use, provide security lighting at the construction site, lock up all building and construction tools, and any temporary construction and office trailers will need to have heavy duty dead-bolt locks and auxiliary locking devices on the windows. When the site is finished, it will require security lighting around the building and in the parking lots to help prevent thefts, vandalism and burglaries. Office areas will require dead-bolt locks. Back doors will require peep holes so employees can view the parking lots before exiting the building. The applicant will be required to submit a Fire Mitigation Fee to off-set the adverse impacts to the City-wide fire service system. The fee is based upon the square footage of the additions and is required at the time of issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation of $0.52 per square foot of building (98,910 square feet x $0.52 = $51,433.20). The Fire Mitigation Fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. Stee l S 1 Facility LUA-96-022, SA,ECF Page 6 B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF X DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall be required to pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project (66,000 / 1,000 x 4.88 = 322.08 total trips); $75.00 x 322.08 = $24,156.00. This fee is due at the time of the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of $0.52 per square feet of building = 98,910 square feet x$0.52 = $51,433.20. This fee is payable at the time of the issuance of building permits. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only,they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. GENERAL: 1. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City, state, county, federal and other jurisdictional regulations, codes and policies governing the project and site. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate submittals prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, according to City of Renton Drafting standards. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000, 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000; and 3% of anything over $200,000. One-half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. 3. The applicant is required to obtain a construction permit in order to accomplish site work and installation of site improvements. Farwest Steel Facility LUA-96-022, SA,ECF Page 7 FIRE: 4. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,750 gpm. Six hydrants are required; one fire hydrant 150 feet of the proposed building and five hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 5. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 6. The access for.Fire Department apparatus is acceptable as shown. All of the fire lanes shall be marked according to City Ordinance. 7. The City's Fire Mitigation Fee is required and is noted as a. Mitigation Measure under the Environmental Review Committee Report Mitigation Measures., This.fee is payable prior to the issuance of a building permit. UTILITIES General: 8. Each utility (water, sewer and storm drainage) is to be shown on separate utility sheets per City drafting standards. The applicant will include a Title Sheet with an index and legend for the project. Water: 9. A looped water system is required around the building since the required fire flow exceeds 2,500 gpm. Approximately 5,000 gpm of fire flow is available with a 12 inch looped water system. 10. A new 15 foot utility easement will be required for water. A legal description of the easement must also be submitted for approval. The applicant must show the water easement (center line and stationing). 11. The System Development Charge (SDC) charge for water is estimated to be $18,239.09 and is payable prior to the issuance of the construction permit. This estimate reflects previous partial payment of water utility connection charges for the site. 12. The applicant must provide an Irrigation Plan with back-flow prevention device (double check-valve assembly- DCVA). 13. The applicant shall provide a Water Plan and Profile. These drawings must comply with City drafting standards. Wastewater 14. The sewer line proposed to run underneath the building must be encased in a steel casing that extends 5 feet beyond the building. 15. The applicable Sewer System Development Charge is $0.078 per square foot of gross area, but not less than $585.00. The total estimated sewer SDC charge is $19,146.66 and is payable prior to the issuance of the construction permit. 16. Floor drains must be tightlined to the sanitary sewer system. • • Farwest Steel Facility LUA-96-022, SA,ECF Page 8 17. The Sewer(Wastewater) Plan and Profile must comply with City drafting standards. 18. The sewer cleanouts are to be located within 5 feet of the building and every 100 feet thereafter. 19. The minimum slope for sewer to the property line is 2% to the right-of-way. 20. . The floor elevation below 22 feet with require a backflow prevention device on the sewer line. 21. The applicant will show the top .and invert elevation and approximate cover on their plans. The minimum amount of cover is two (2) feet. 22. The applicant will show the finished floor elevation on their plans. 23. The vertical datum shown is NGVD 29. The applicant must show the equation with ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network (Net #1544 at intersection of East Valley Road SW and 34th Street NAVD 6.022 [meters]). (Note: NGVD 29 = North American Geodetic Vertical Datum 1929, NAVD = North American Vertical Datum 1988.) Storm Drainage (Surface Water): 24. The applicant's Drainage Report must state how it addresses King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) Special Requirements#5.and#6. 25. The Drainage Report.must note any existing and predicted.problems. The 'applicant will state how control run-off compares with the existing run-off. The applicant will state if the defined conveyance system elements will contain run-off without inundating or overtopping the roadway on Lind Avenue SW. 26. The applicant will state what is planned for KCSWDM Core Requirement#5 in their final report.. 27. The System Development Connection charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious area, but not less than $385.00. Total charge is estimated to be $23,939.82 and is due prior to the issuance of the construction permit. 28. The applicant will provide a plan and profile of the Storm Drainage System to City Standards. 29. The vertical datum shown is NGVD 29. The applicant will show the equation with tie to the City of Renton survey control Net #1544 at the intersection of East Valley Road and SW 34th Street NAVD 6.022 (meters). TRANSPORTATION: 30. A six (6) foot sidewalk is required for the full length of the property frontage to SW 34th Street with the back edge of the sidewalk located at the property line and planter strip between the curb and sidewalk. ' 31. The applicant shall provide an Off-Site Improvement Plan using City of Renton standard details showing sidewalk and driveway details. 32. The project is subject to the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee. The fee is discussed under the ERC Report Mitigation Measures. The fee is estimated to be $24,156. and would be deposited to Account#105/599.318.70.00.160. Farwest Steel Facility LUA-96-022, SA,ECF Page 9 POLICE: 33. It is recommended that any and all building materials be secured when not in use, provide security lighting at the construction site, lock up all building and construction tools, and any temporary construction and office trailers will need to have heavy duty dead-bolt locks and auxiliary locking devices on the windows. When the site is finished, it will require security lighting around the building and in the parking lots to help prevent thefts, vandalism and,burglaries. Office areas will require dead-bolt locks. Back doors will require peep holes so employees can view the parking lots before exiting the building. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES: 34. The structural preload will require a separate permit and special inspection by the Soils Engineer. 35. The piling can be accomplished under a separate permit with a special inspection. 36. The foundation excavations are to be approved by the Soils Engineer prior to placement of concrete. 37. The structural engineer is to design for unequal settlement. Part Three: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION Report & Decision A. Type of Land Use Action x Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade&Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 1 of 1, Site Plan (Received February 27, 1996). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 1 of 1, Preliminary Storm Drain, Water, Sanitary Sewer and Grading Plan (Received February 27, 1996). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 1 of 2, Floor Plan (Received February 27, 1996). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. 2 of 2, Elevations (Received February 27, 1996). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing No. L-1, Landscape Plan (Received February 27, 1996). Exhibit No. 7. Neighborhood Detail Map Drawing (Received February 27, 1996). • Farwest Steel Facility LUA-96-022,SA,ECF Page 10 C. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA: • In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31-33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following Issues have been identified by City Departmental / Divisional Reviewers: 1. GENERAL CRITERIA: a. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; The intent of,the Comprehensive Plan in areas designated Employment Area - Industrial is to "create and sustain industrial areas which function as integrated employment activity areas." Primary uses in the designation should be industrial, but secondary uses, including offices 'are encouraged. New industrial development should be well landscaped with provisions for safe and convenient pedestrian circulation.' The proposal meets the intent of the policies with regard to allowed uses. In order to more fully comply with policies for pedestrian movement the applicant should demonstrate how employees will safely access the office and warehouse buildings from employee parking,areas (lighting, designated walkways). The applicant will also need to provide for on-site recreation for employees through the provisions of on-site open space and recreational components, i.e. outdoor seating areas, basketball hoop, bike racks, etc.). b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; Warehousing is allowed as a primary permitted use in the IM Zone. Offices are permitted as a secondary use in conjunction with a primary permitted use. The proposal is in compliance with this criteria. The proposal meets minimum landscape standards which requires that a 15 foot strip of landscaping be provided along non-arterial streets. Since there is no height limit in the IM Zone, the 43 to 51 foot height of the warehouse would be in compliance. There is no maximum lot coverage in the IM Zone, therefore, the proposal complies. The applicant's proposal showed a total of 50 parking spaces. Warehouses must provide 1 parking space per 1,500 gross square feet (gsf). Phase 1 construction of a 63,300 gsf warehouse would require 42 parking spaces. The office uses would result in the addition of 3,360 square feet of office. The applicable parking ratio is 3 (minimum) to 4.5 (maximum) parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of office. The applicant would need from 10 to 15 spaces to support the office use. Based on the Parking and Loading. Ordinance, the applicant would be required to provide a minimum total of 52 to a maximum of 57 parking spaces for Phase 1 development. Revisions submitted by the applicant provide for the required 52 to 57 parking spaces for Phase 1 development. Phase 2 development would add another 32,250 gsf of warehouse. An additional 22 parking spaces would be required to serve the Phase 2 warehouse. The applicant has options including: providing for the additional parking on the site plan; establishing a parking reserve, or obtaining a modification from the Code requirements. The applicant has provided a revised drawing showing how the additional 22 parking spaces would be provided for. For the entire project (Phases 1 and 2) a total of between 74 (minimum) and 79 (maximum) vehicular parking spaces are required. The parking associated with each phase must be provided at the time of development of each phase. The applicant has demonstrated that the parking could be accommodated on site per the requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. Farwest Steel Facility LUA-96-022, SA,ECF Page 11 c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The proposal incorporates landscaping to buffer the use from existing and proposed off-site uses. No excessive generation of nuisance (noise, odor, dust) is anticipated to occur. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The proposal anticipates future expansion and provides for the construction while maintaining site access and circulation. Storm facilities would be sized for the both phases of the proposed project. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposal•would integrate,with the recently developed sites in the area, and those which have been long established. No reduction of area-wide property values would occur. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The proposal provides a clear separation between truck traffic and private employee/customer vehicle parking areas. g. Provision of adequate light and air; No blocking of light or air would occur with the proposal. A lighting plan would need to be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; None anticipated. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Adequate services and facilities exist to accommodate the proposal. j. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. Development would result in an industrial/warehouse use with on-site landscaped. No deterioration or blight would be expected to occur. 2. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES: a. Mitigation of undesirable impacts of proposed structures and site layouts that could impair the use or enjoyment or potential use of surrounding uses and structures and of the community; Site layout would not impact surrounding uses. b. Mitigation of undesirable impacts when an overscale structure, in terms of size, bulk, height, and intensity, or site layout is permitted that violates the spirit and/or intent of the zoning code and impairs the use, enjoyment or potential use of surrounding properties; While the primary site structure would be large, so are typical uses in this zone. The architectural treatment of the structure includes a mix of concrete and metal, painted in a neutral tone. The orientation of the warehouse would place the longest portion of the structure along SW 34th Street. The building Farwest Steel Facility LUA-96-022, SA,ECF Page 12 would setback (Plan View) from the east boundary to diminish size of the structure. Grade level truck bay doors on the south side of the warehouse would provide for some articulation on the south facade. c. Provision of a desirable transition and linkage between uses and to the street, utility, walkway, and trail systems in the surrounding area by the arrangement of landscaping, fencing and/or other buffering techniques, in order to prevent conflicts and to promote coordinated and planned benefit from, and access to, such elements; A pedestrian walkway is proposed along the west side of the SW 34th access drive to the warehouse structure... Proposed landscaping would provide buffering for surrounding commercial uses. The applicant should make a provision for a pedestrian connection from the Lind access drive. d. Consideration of placement and scale of proposed structures in relation to the natural characteristics of a site in order to avoid over-concentration of structures on a particular portion of a site such that they create a perception of greater height or bulk than intended under the spirit of the zoning code; The structure is adequately sited given consideration for future expansion and the relationship of the buildings to the site boundaries and the street system. e. Effective location, design and screening of parking and .service areas in order to promote efficient function of such facilities, to provide integrated facilities between uses when beneficial, to promote "campus-like" or "park-like" layouts in appropriate zones, and to prevent unnecessary repetition and conflict between uses and service areas or facilities; Parking would be separated from truck maneuvering areas. The employee/customer parking area would be located closest to the main office area. f. Mitigation of the unnecessary and avoidable impacts of new construction on views from existing buildings and future developable sites, recognizing the public benefit and desirability of maintaining visual accessibility to attractive natural features and of promoting "campus-like" or "park-like" settings in appropriate zones; The proposed landscaping would provide for appropriate buffering of an industrial use from adjacent uses. g. Provision of effective screening from public streets and residential uses for all permitted outdoor storage areas (except auto and truck sales), for surface mounted utility equipment, for rooftop equipment, and for all refuse and garbage containers, in order to promote a "campus-like" or "park-like" setting where appropriate and to preserve the effect and intent of screening or buffering otherwise required by the zoning code; Site landscaping would screen on-site storage uses from off-site areas. The refuse area would be located on the south side of the warehouse in an enclosed area, and adjacent to the grade level truck bay doors. h. Consideration of placement and design of exterior lighting in order to avoid excessive brightness or glare to adjacent properties and streets. The applicant will need to submit a lighting plan for approval from the Development Services Division. Farwest Steel Facility LUA-96-022, SA,ECF Page 13 3. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF A PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE: a. Building placement and spacing to provide for privacy and noise reduction; orientation to views and vistas and to site amenities, to sunlight and prevailing winds, and to pedestrian and vehicle needs; The building would be oriented east west, which is appropriate given the size requirements, function and configuration of streets, is appropriate for the site. b. Consideration of placement and scale of proposed structures in relation to the openness and natural characteristics of a site in order to avoid over concentration or the impression of oversized structures; The structure is appropriately placed in relation to site constraints, and the applicant's architectural program and requirements. c. Preservation of the desirable natural landscape through retention of existing vegetation and limited soil removal, insofar.as the natural characteristics will enhance the proposed development; Approximately 40% of the site would be retained in its natural condition. Native plant materials and ornamentals are proposed throughout the development. d. Use of existing,topography to reduce undue cutting, filling and retaining walls in order to prevent erosion and unnecessary storm water runoff, and to preserve stable natural slopes and desirable natural vegetation; The site slopes less than 1%. Fill material will be imported for pre-loading. e. Limitation of paved or impervious surfaces, where feasible, to reduce runoff and increase natural infiltration; Impervious areas are proposed for vehicle maneuvering, access and building location. While a large portion of the site would be covered with new impervious area, adequate storm facilities will be provided, and landscaping is proposed to increase infiltration. f. Design and protection of planting areas so that they are not susceptible to damage from vehicles or pedestrian movements; The proposal complies by concentrating landscaped areas in areas not frequented with vehicular movements. g. Consideration of building form and placement and landscaping to enhance year-round conditions of sun and shade both on-site and on adjacent properties and to promote energy conservation. The orientation of buildings on an east/west axis provides a reasonable solution to the sun/shade criteria. Farwest Steel Facility LUA-96-022, SA,ECF Page 14 4. CIRCULATION AND ACCESS: a. Provision of adequate and safe vehicular access to and from all properties; The applicant shows an access and utility easement to/from Lind Avenue SW to the southeast portion of the site. The applicant has provided a letter that demonstrates that an agreement has been reached between the applicant and the adjoining property owner for the granting of the easement. Pedestrian movement on the site may conflict with vehicular movement in the area between the warehouse and the office. A marked pedestrian path, or other type of direction for drivers/pedestrians will be required as a condition of approval. The project proposes grade level truck bays along the south'side of the Phase 1 warehouse. Two elevated truck bays four feet in height would be located on the stepped-back section of the south facade (east end) of Phase 1 development. Two additional dock-high truck doors would be located on the south- facing side of the east end of Phase 2 development. Adequate circulation of minimum 45 feet is being maintained in front of the grade level truck bays, and the minimum required 100 feet of circulation area is being maintained in front of the dock-high truck bays. b. Arrangement of the circulation pattern so that all ingress and egress movements may occur at as few points as possible along the public street, the points being capable of channelization for turning movements; Two points of vehicular access are proposed, one from each of the surrounding streets. The applicant has provided a letter to the Development Services Division that an agreement has been reached between the applicant and the adjacent property owner for the granting of the access/utilities easement. c. Consolidation of access points with adjacent properties, when feasible; N/A d. Coordination of access points on a superbiock basis so that vehicle conflicts and vehicle/pedestrian conflicts are minimized; N/A e. Orientation of access points to side streets or frontage streets rather than directly onto arterial streets, when feasible; Proposed access points would match driveways existing on the north side of SW 34th would parallel an existing railroad line which crosses Lind Avenue. f. Promotion of the safety and efficiency of the internal circulation system, including the location, design and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian access points, drives, parking, turnarounds, walkways, bikeways, and emergency access ways; A condition of approval is proposed which would require the applicant to provide for increased safety of pedestrian movement on the site. g. Separation of loading and delivery areas from parking and pedestrian areas; Loading and delivery areas are separated from parking pedestrian areas. Farwest Steel Facility - LUA-96-022, SA, ECF Page 15 h. Provisions for transit and carpool facilities and access where appropriate; and N/A i. Provision for safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking areas, buildings, public sidewalks and adjacent properties. A condition has been proposed to require the applicant to provide for safer on-site pedestrian/vehicular movement. 5. SIGNAGE: a. Employment of signs primarily for the purpose of identification; The applicant will be required to meet the requirements of the Sign Code. b. Management of sign elements, such as size, location and arrangement so that signs complement the visual character of the surrounding area and appear in proportion to the building and site to which they pertain; The applicant will be required to meet the requirements of the Sign Code. c. Limitation of the number of signs to avoid visual clutter and.distraction; The applicant will be required to meet the requirements of the Sign Code. d. Moderation of surface brightness or lighting intensity except for that necessary for sign visibility; The applicant will be required to meet the requirements of the Sign Code and provide a sign plan that is acceptable to the Development Services Division. e. Provision of an identification system to allow for quick location of buildings and addresses. (Ord. 3981, 4-7-86) The applicant will be required to meet the requirements of the Sign Code. 6. AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA (APA): N/A 7. HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT AND STORAGE FACILITIES: a. Above-ground hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities shall be constructed with containment controls which will prevent the escape of hazardous wastes in the event of an accidental release from the facility. Such controls shall conform with all adopted Federal, State and local design and construction standards. N/A b. Underground hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities shall comply with Chapter 2 of Title VII, the Underground Storage Tank Ordinance. Farwest Steel Facility LUA-96-022, SA,ECF Page 16 N/A c. Hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities shall comply with article 80 of the Uniform Fire Code as adopted by ordinance by the City of Renton. N/A d. A hazardous waste spill contingency plan for immediate-implementation in the event of a release of hazardous wastes at the facility shall be reviewed .and approved by the Renton Fire Department prior to issuance of any permits. N/A e. The location of all on-site and off-site facilities must comply with the state siting criteria as adopted in accordance with RCW 70.105.210. (Ord. 4186, 11-14-88) N/A X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now makes and enters the following: D. Findings 1) Request: The Applicant, Bart Treece (Horton Dennis and Associates, Inc.) has requested Environmental Review & Administrative Site Plan Approval for development of a steel distribution warehouse and office facility. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application generally complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 7. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Industrial (EAI). 5) Zoning: The site plan as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Medium Industrial (IM) zoning designation. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the sublect site include: North: Burlington Northern Industrial Park; East: Vacant (proposed for future GI Joes store), East Valley Highway; South: commercial (Home Base, Act III Theater complex); and West: warehouse and distribution center. • J , Farwest Steel Facility ' LUA-96-022,SA,ECF Page 17 E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. Parking has been revised to provide the appropriate number of spaces required by the Parking and Loading Ordinance. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Industrial (EAI); and the Zoning designation of Industrial - Medium (IM). F. Decision The Site Plan for Phases 1 and 2 of the Farwest Steel Facility, File No. LUA-96-022,SA,ECF is approved, subject to following conditions: CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of the Construction Permit that pedestrian safety has been addressed. This shall be accomplished through a combination of adequate lighting, and a clearly indicated pedestrian circulation between employee parking areas and site buildings. 2. The applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of the Construction Permit that on-site open space and/or recreational opportunities are being provided for employees. Appropriate features would include the provision of a combination of benches, tables, bike racks, or basketball or other recreational facilities on site. 3. The applicant shall submit a lighting plan for approval to the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of a Construction Permit. SIGNATURES James C. Hanson,Zoning Administrator date Michael D.Kattermann,Zoning Administrator date TRANSMITTED this 29th day of March, 1996 to the applicant and owner: Mr. Barton Treece Hotrod Dennis&Associates, Inc. 320 Second Avenue South Kirkland, WA 98033 Farwest Steel Facility LUA-96-022, SA,ECF Page 18 Burlington Northern Railroad Properties, Inc. 1011 Western Avenue, Suite 700 Seattle, WA 98104 Powell Orillia Associates, Inc. 737 Market Street Kirkland, WA 98033 TRANSMITTED this 29th day of March, 1996 to the following: Bob Arthur,Land Use Inspector Jim Chandler,Building Official Art Larson,Fire Marshal Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney Valley Daily News Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration The decision on the requested administrative land use action is being made separately from the Environmental Determination. The administrative land use and environmental decisions will become final if the decision/decisions is not appealed within 14 days of the date of the publication. An appeal of either or both decisions must be filed within the 14 day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3);WAC 197-11-680). REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION of the land use action must be filed in writing on or before April 12, 1996. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of publication. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 4-8-11.B, which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals of the Environmental Determination must be made in writing before 5 p.m.on April 9, 1996. Appeals of the land use action must be made by 5 pm on April 12, 1996. Any appeal must be accompanied by a $75.00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE MARCH 19, 1996 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Sa Chastain, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jim Hanson & Mike Kattermann Meeting Date:. Tuesday, MARCH 19, 1996 Time: 9:00 AM Location: Third Floor Conference Room Agenda listed below. Boeing Buildings 4-45 & 4-79 Watermain Replacement(New) (Pywell/5586) LUA-96-017,ECF The applicant seeks approval to replace an existing water line on-site. Approximately 2,350 L.F. of 12" fire main and 1,623 L.F. of 8"watermain will be installed. The existing line will be abandoned in place. Location: Boeing's Renton Facility in the vicinity of the 4-45 and 4-79 buildings. Farwest Steel Distribution Center(New) (Henning/6186) LUA-96-022,SA,ECF The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of a vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building, a 660 square foot temporary office facility, and a 2,700 square foot office building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. Location: SW 34th Street, Between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue. Raymond Avenue Center 11(New) (Henning/6186) LUA-96-015,SA,ECF The applicant proposes to develop the site for warehouse, office and manufacturing uses. The proposed structure would be 99,635 Square Feet in size. Parking for 128 cars and dock high service for 20 trucks would also be provided. Development would maintain a 50 foot setback from Springbrook Creek and a 25 foot buffer from the Class Ill wetland on site. Location: 2000 Raymond Avenue South. cc: J.Covington, Executive Assistant to the Mayor L.Warren, City Attorney (R) F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner S.Carlson, Economic Development Director(R) J.Gray, Fire Prevention A.Larson,Fire Prevention(R) P.Pierce, P/B/PW Admin. 'OWELL DEVELOPMENT CO 737 Market Street Kirkland, WA 98033 (206)828-4444 FAX(206) 822-8297 March 26, 1996 �� :ERC: 1996 Jenny Bartz, Planning Technician vEVELOp��ycfi7 p N 200 Mill ACITY OF RvenueOSouth ciry of Reriv°NNING Renton, WA 98055 RE: FARWEST STEEL EASEMENT Dear Jenny: This letter shall act as confirmation that Powell-Orillia Associates, a Washington general partnership and owner of Lot 7 of the Burlington Northern Subdivision, has agreed to grant Farwest Steel an easement over the northerly portion of Lot 7 for ingress, egress and utilities. The final form of the easement agreement is in all parties' hands for final review. A copy of said easement is attached hereto. Sincerely, L-ORILLI SOCIATES eter W. Powe 1 General Partner jgt Encl. cc: Dave Forester-Farwest Steel Bart Treece-HDA Norm LeCompte, Jr., Esq. Lloyd W. Powell -Powell-Orillia Assoc. SENTAY;ALSTON COURTNAGE ; 3-27-86 ;11;38AM ; 206:6231752 2068228207;# 3/20 8EMENT AGE This Easement Agreement ("Agreement") is made on this day of March, 1996 by and between POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES, a Washington general partnership ("Grantor") and YARWEST STEEL CORPORATION, a corporation ("Grantee") . Grantor and Grantee agree to all of the following terms and conditions, including the recitals. SECTION I: RECITALS 1.1 Grantor owns that certain real property (the "Servient Estate") described as follows: Lot 7, Burlington Northern, a binding site plan, according to City of Renton Binding Site Plan recorded June 30, 1992 in Volume 161 of Plats, Pages 8 through 11, inclusive, under King County Recording No. 9206302696. 1,2 Grantee owns that certain real property (the. "Dominant Estate") described as follows: Lot B, Burlington Northern, a binding site plan, according to City of Renton Binding Site Plan recorded June 30, 1992 in Volume 161 of Plats, Pages 8 through 11, inclusive, under King County Recording No. 9206302696; and Parcel A of Short Plat No. 378-79, according to the short plat recorded under King County Recording No. 7909249001. 1.3 Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a description of what shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Easement Property". The Easement Property is a portion of the Servient Estate. Attached hereto as exhibit A-1 is a drawing showing the Easement Property with crosshatching. 1.4 Grantee wishes to have access over and certain utility rights under the Easement Property. Grantor is willing to grant such rights to Grantee on the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. jBCTION 2_: GRANT Or 8AAEMBNT Subject to the other terms and conditions outlined in this Agreement, Grantor hereby grants to Grantee a non-exclusive easement over and under the Easement Property for purposes of (1) obtaining pedestrian and/or vehicular ingress to and egress from the Dominant Estate and (2) from time to time installing and maintaining in the subsurface of the Easement Property storm sewer, 1366/OM3:3/Z7/96 -1- EASElUIT3 RWAI PWEu/FARWEST SENT;,BY:ALSTON COURTNAGE ; 3-27-86 ;11;38AM ; 2Ub:b231'/b2-4 2Ubo22d2 i 1;* 4/2U sanitary sewer, electrical, gas, telephone, cable and other utility systems serving the Dominant Estate. Such easement rights shall hereinafter be collectively referred to as the "Easements". PCTION 3 t DURATION OF EAB1XENTS The Easements granted in this Agreement shall be perpetual in duration. SECTION 4: CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD 4.1 In consideration for the above grant of the Easements, Grantee hereby agrees that it will commence on or before that day which is ninety (90) days after receipt of the requisite building permit(s) or removal of the required surcharge, whichever is later, and complete (subject to force majsure delays beyond Grantee's . reasonable control) on or before that date which is one (1) year after the commencement date, at Grantee's sole expense, the road improvements depicted on Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (such road improvement work shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Road Work") . Grantee shall pursue diligently and in good faith the requisite permit(s) and the commencement and completion of the required surcharge work so as to yield a commencement date for .the Road Work that is as close to the date of this Agreement as is reasonably possible. Grantee shall cause the Road Work to be completed in a good and workmanlike manner, in accordance with all applicable laws and • regulations and without undue delay once the Road Work has commenced. In addition, Grantee agrees to keep the servient Estate free of any liens arising out of ar related to the Road Work, and if a lien is nonetheless filed against the Servient Estate arising out of or relating to the Road. Work, Grantee agrees to promptly post a bond at Grantee's expense in accordance with the terms of RCW 60.04.141, as the same may be amended, so. as to release the Servient Estate from such lien. Before signing any construction contracts for all or any portion of the Road Work, Grantee shall submit the name of the proposed contractor or contractors to Grantor, together with copies of the proposed construction contract(s) and schedule(s) , all of which shall be subject to the review and approval of Grantor, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. 4.2 A portion of the road described in Exhibit It will cross over an existing underground storm water retention outfall pipe. Grantee hereby agrees to indemnify and hold Grantor and Grantor's successors and assigns harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities and expenses (including attorneys fees incurred with or without litigation or on appeal) arising out of or in any way related to any damage to or interference with the functioning of such pipe caused by the Road Work, use of the road or any of the utility installation or maintenance work permitted in 1366/053:3/27/96 -2- EASUUIT3 RNACAU/P0UELL,rARWEST SENT..BY:ALSTON COURTNAGE ; 3-27-36 ;11:39AM ; 206:6231752 2068228297;# 5/20 this Agreement, except to the extent that any such claims, damages, liabilities or expenses arise out of or are in any way related to the actions or inactions of Grantor. The foregoing indemnity is specifically and expressly intended to. constitute a waiver of Grantee's immunity under Industrial Insurance Title 51 RCW, to the extent necessary to provide Grantor with a complete indemnity for the negligence of Grantee's employees to the extent of their negligence and has been the subject of specific negotiation between the parties. SECTION St UTILITIES 5.1 Any utilities installed under the Easement Property for the benefit of the Dominant Estate shall be installed at the sole expense of Grantee and shall be maintained in a good condition at the sole expense of Grantee. Similarly, of course, if Grantor elects to install any utilities under (or above) the Easement Property, such shall be installed and maintained in a good condition at Grantor's sole expense. Prior to commencing any utility installation or repair work, the party wishing to perform the installation or repair work (hereinafter referred to as the "Working Party") shall (1) provide the other party with a written description of the work in question (including, but not limited to, information regarding location/layout, sizing and invert) , as well as the proposed time frames within which the work will be done and (2) use reasonable good faith efforts to accommodate reasonable timing revisions proposed by the other party '(the Working Party shall agree to conduct the work in question after normal business hours if the work will materially interfere with either access or the provision of utility services to the other party's parcel) . In all events, the Working Party shall (1) take reasonable steps to minimize any disruption to the other party caused by the work in question and (2) complete the work in a good and workmanlike manner and in - accordance with all applicable laws and , regulations. Moreover, if Grantee is the Working Party, Grantee shall not allow any liens to be filed against the Servient Estate arising out of or related to the work in question, and if such a lien is nonetheless filed against the Servient Estate, Grantee shall, at Grantee's sole expense, post a bond in accordance with the terms of RCW 60.04.161 so as to remove the lien from the Servient Estate. If the utility work in question will damage any of the Road Work improvements, the Working Party shall, promptly after completion of the work in question and at the Working Party's sole expense, repair and replace the Road Work improvements to the condition they were in prior to the commencement of the work in question. 5.2 Grantor shall at all times be entitled to tap into or otherwise connect to any utility system installed by Grantee or for the benefit of the Dominant Estate without paying any latecomer's charge, hook-up fee or other reimbursement payment, provided that (1) Grantor does not overburden the utility system in question or 1366/053:3/Z7/96 -3- EASEMNT3 RMAcAU/POMELL/FARYEST StALBY:ALS'1UIN LUUK11VAlk. ; ei-L/-JU T11.dJIM i 2110•ULJ!/c7L-' .LUUU,LLdLJirff U/LU materially diminish its service to Grantee and (2) any maintenance expenses incurred in connection with any shared utility system shall be split between Grantor and Grantee in proportion to their respective amounts of usage of the system in question (however, if the maintenance work is required due to the negligence or intentional misconduct of either party, that party shall bear all repair expenses and if the maintenance is required at a point in the utility line in question that no longer serves one of the parties, the party not served shall not be required to participate in the repair or maintenance expenses) . Moreover, Grantor shall be entitled to require Grantee to increase the capacity of one, some or all, of the utility systems being installed by Grantee to accommodate Grantor's use, provided that (a) Grantor agrees to pay for all additional expenses relating to such oversizing and (b) Grantor advises Grantee of its election to oversize a given utility system prior to the commencement by Grantee of the installation of such system (in other words, once the system has been installed, Grantor shall no longer have the right to require oversizing) . SECTION 6: MAINTIN NCE OP ROAD WORK IMPROVEMENTS 6.1 The Road work improvements shall be maintained by the parties in a good, safe, clean and presentable condition and all costs incurred in such maintenance shall be split between the parties on a pro rata basis based on the ratio of the total floor area in all buildings located on a party's parcel to the total floor area in all buildings located on both the Dominant Estate and the Servient Estate. Until such time as a building is located on the Servient Estate, Grantee, at Grantee's expense, shall have the right to undertake any required maintenance work without any notice to or consent from Grantor. After a building is located on the Servient Estate, either party shall have the right to undertake any required maintenance work, but no party shall do so without first advising the other party of the work in question, the proposed timing for such work, the proposed contractor or contractors who will perform the work and the estimated cost thereof. If the other party reasonably objects to the proposed timing, cost (including allocation thereof -- see Section 6.2 below) or contractor or the need for the maintenance work in question, the parties shall endeavor in good faith to settle their differences before the work is commenced, and if they are unable to do so,. they will implement the arbitration procedure described' below in Section 6.4 to determine whether the objection in question is reasonable. If the Arbitrator determines that the objection is reasonable, it shall enter the appropriate order under the circumstances (e.g. , it may order bidding, a delay in the commencement of the work, a change in contractor, a disproportionate sharing of costs pursuant to the terms of Section 6.2 below, etc. , or it may order that the work need not be done at all) . 1366/053:3/27/96 -4- EASEMNT3 RMACAU/POYELL/FARYEST SENT BY:ALSTON COURTNAGE ; 3-27-96 ;11:40AM ; 206:6231752 2068228297;# 7/20 6.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, any maintenance work required by the negligence or intentional misconduct of a party, or a party's employees, tenants, agents or invitees, shall be paid for solely by such party. 6.3 With regard to maintenance work done in accordance with the terms of Section 6.1 above, the instigating party shall invoice the other party for its share of the cost of such work within one hundred eighty (180) days after completion of such work and, if the party being invoiced is Grantor, such invoices shall be accompanied by full lien releases from the general contractor who was responsible for the work in question,. The .invoiced party shall pay its pro ,rata share of the cost in question within fifteen (15) days after the instigating party complies with the terms of the immediately preceding sentence. If the invoiced party fails to make such payment within such 15 day period, the sum in question shall begin to accrue interest at the rate of the prime rate of interest as charged at the time in question by Seattle First National Bank, Main Branch, plus five percent (5%) per annum, from the end of such 15 day period through the date of payment. In addition, any such claim for reimbursement by the invoicing party, together with the above-described interest, shall be a secured right and a lien shall attach and take effect upon recordation of the below-described claim of lien by the invoicing party in the King County Recorder's Office. The claim of lien shall include the following: (i) the name of the claimant; (ii) a statement concerning the basis of the claim of the lien; (iii) the last known name and address of the owner or reputed owner of the parcel against which the lien is claimed; (iv) a description of the real property against which the lien is claimed; (v) a description of the work performed or payment made which has given rise to the claim of lien hereunder and a statement itemizing the amount thereof; and (vi) a statement that the lien is claimed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement reciting the recordation number of this Agreement. The claim of lien shall be duly acknowledged and shall contain a certificate that a copy thereof has been served upon the owner against whom the lien is claimed, either by personal service or by mailing to such owner by certified mail sent from King County, Washington. The lien so claimed shall attach from the date of recordation solely in the amount claimed thereby and it may be enforced by suit, under power of sale (which power is hereby granted) , judicial foreclosure or in any other manner allowed by law for the foreclosure of liens. Any exercise of the power of sale or foreclosure shall be conducted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington applicable to the exercise of powers of sale in or foreclosures of mortgages and deeds of trust. If appropriate, the invoicing party is hereby appointed the trustee for purposes of exercising such power of sale, with full right of substitution. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such liens shall be subordinate to any mortgage or deed of trust given in good faith and for value now or hereafter encumbering the property subjected 1366/053:3/27,96 -5- EASEMRT3 RMACAU/POYELL/FARWEST SIT t ;ALS'1'ON COUK1'NA(ib ; 3-2/-Ub ;1I:40AM ; 206;8231762-•1 2088228287;# 8/20 to the lien, provided such mortgage or deed of trust was recorded prior to the recording of . the lien, and any purchaser at any foreclosure or trustee's sale • (as well as any grantee by deed in lieu of foreclosure or trustee's sale) under any prior mortgage or deed of trust shall take free and clear from any such then existing lien, but otherwise subject to the provisions of this Agreement. 6.4 If the parties are unable to resolve their differences as to an issue arising out of Sections 6.1 or 6.2, . the dispute shall be resolved by single-arbitrator arbitration before the American Arbitration Association under the Commercial Arbitration Rules modified as follows: (i) the total time from date of demand for arbitration to final award shall not exceed thirty (30) days; (ii) the Arbitrator shall be chosen by the American Arbitration Association without submittal of lists and subject to challenge only for good cause shown; (iii) all notices may be by telephone or other electronic communication with later confirmation in writing; (iv) the time, date and place of the hearing shall be set by the Arbitrator in his or her sole discretion, provided that there shall be at least five (5) days prior notice of the hearing; (v) there shall be no post-hearing briefs; (vi) there shall be no discovery except by order of the Arbitrator; and (vii) the Arbitrator shall issue his or her award within seven (7) days after the close of the hearing. Any of the above provisions may be modified by stipulation of the parties.. The decision of the Arbitrator shall be final and non-appealable and enforceable in any court of competent jurisdiction. The parties hereby release.the Arbitrator from any and all claims or possible claims against the Arbitrator based on the decision of the Arbitrator. The prevailing party in the proceeding shall be awarded reasonable attorneys' fees, expert and non-expert witness costs and expenses, and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with the arbitration, unless the Arbitrator for good cause determines otherwise. The costs and fees of the Arbitrator shall be borne by the non-prevailing party, unless the Arbitrator for good cause determines otherwise. SECTION 7; CROSS-,INDENZIITY Each party to this Agreement hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the other party harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities and expenses (including attorneys' fees incurred with or without litigation or on appeal) arising out of or in any way related to the use of the Easement Property by the indemnifying party, its employees, tenants, agents or invitees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the claims, damages, liabilities and expenses so arising are caused by the concurrent negligence of both parties, their employees,, tenants, agents or invitees, each party shall indemnify the other only to the extent of the indemnifying party's own negligence or that.,of .its agents, tenants, employees or invitees. The foregoing indemnity is specifically and expressly intended to constitute a waiver of each party's immunity 1366/653:3/27/96 -6- EASppT3 RMACAU/POWELL/FARYEST SENT BY:ALSTON COURTNAGE ; 3-27-96 ;11:41AM ; 206:6231752-, 206.8228297;# 9/20 • under Industrial Insurance Title 51 RCW, to the extent necessary to provide the indemnified party with a complete indemnity for the negligence of the indemnifying party's employees, to the extent of their negligence, and has been the subject of specific negotiation between the parties. SECTION8: RESERYAT;ON OF EIGHTS Grantor hereby reserves the right to use the Easement Property however it wishes (including the right to construct improvements on, under and above the Easement Property) provided such use does not materially or unreasonably interfere with Grantee's above- granted rights under the Easements. In addition, Grantor hereby reserves all other rights in and to the Easement Property not specifically granted to Grantee herein. SECTION 9: SUCCESSORS ]STD ASSIGNS • All of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run with the land and shall inure to the benefit' of, and be binding upon, the successors and assigns, personal representatives and heirs of the parties hereto, including without limitation all subsequent owners of the Dominant and Servient Estates and all persons claiming through or under them.• SECTION 10 t NI<OELLMJEo08 10.1 If either party to this Agreement consults an attorney in order to enforce any of the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reimbursement by the non-prevailing party of the prevailing party's reasonable costs and attorneys' fees, whether such costs and attorneys' fees are incurred with or without litigation or on appeal (to the extent inconsistent with the foregoing, the terms of Section 6.4 shall govern over the foregoing with regard to the arbitration procedure described in Section 6.4) . 10.2 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the, Easement Property. Neither party is relying on any oral or written representation made by the other party or the principals, agents, employees or affiliates of the other party unless such representation is expressed in writing in this Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any prior written agreements between the parties pertaining to the Easement Property. This Agreement may be amended only by a writing signed by both parties. 10.3 No claim of waiver, consent or acquiescence with respect to any provision of this Agreement shall be made against either party unless such party has expressly waived, consented or 1366/053e3/27/96 -7- EASEWIT3 RMACAU/POWELL/FARYEST SENT BY:ALSTON COURTNAGE ; 3-27-06 ;11:41AM ; 206:6231752-) 2060228287;#10/20 acquiesced in writing. In such latter event, the waiver, consent or acquiescence shall not apply to any future action or inaction. 10.4 This Agreement is the result of substantial negotiations between and input from both parties and their respective counsel. Consequently, this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the fair intent of the language contained herein as a whole, and not for or against any party, regardless of who performed the mechanical function of drafting this Agreement. 10.5 If either party 'defaults under this Agreement, the other party may exercise any or all rights and remedies available at law or in equity, including the right to sue for specific performance. Both parties acknowledge and agree that it is necessary that each party have available to it as a potential remedy the right to sue for specific performance. However, before exercising any rights or remedies, each party shall give the other party written notice of the default and five (5) business days to cure a monetary default and thirty (30) days to cure a non-monetary default (if a non- monetary default cannot reasonably be cured within such 30 day period, the defaulting party shall have a longer period of time to cure provided that the cure is commenced within the 30 day period and is thereafter diligently pursued to completion) . In the event of a monetary default or a non-monetary default that is cured at the expense of the non-defaulting party (the parties hereby agree that the non-defaulting party shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure non-monetary defaults of the other party at the expense of the defaulting party if the defaulting party has not cured within the required time frame) , the non-defaulting party shall have the lien rights outlined above in Section 6.3 (to the extent the terms of this Section 10.5 are inconsistent with the terms of Section 6 above, the terms. of Section 6 shall govern with respect to the matters dealt with in Section 6) . 9BANTQR: GRANTOR: • POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES, YARWEST STEEL CORPORATION, a Washington general a corporation, partnership, By: By; Its: Its: 1366/053:3/27/96 -a- EASEMRT3 RMACAU/PC LL/FARYEST SEW UY:ALS'1•UN UOUK11NAUL ; ;i-G/-ib ;11;41AM 2110;b2dlib2-, 2Utab223GW,WF11/LU • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • •• • ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of , 1996, before me, the -undersigned, .a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared , known to me to be the of POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES, the partnership that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the . said instrument to be . the free and voluntary act and deed .of said. partnership, for the purposes therein mentioned, and on oath. stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the person appearing before me and making this acknowledgment is the person whose true signature appears on this document. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in the certificate above written. signature. • Print Neer NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at• . My commission expires • • • 1366/053:3/27/96 .. EASEROIT3 R1ACAU/POIR.L/FARWE5T SENT BY:ALSTON COURTNAGE ; 3-27-96 ;11:42AM ; 206:6231752-' 2060228297;#12/20 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of , 1996, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared , known to me to be the of FARWEST STEEL CORPORATION, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she .was authorized to execute. said instrument. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the person appearing before me and making ..this.. acknowledgment is the . person whose true signature appears on this document. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in the certificate above written. Signature • Print Name. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My commission expires 1366/053:3/Z7/96 -10- EASERMT3 kIIAIAU/POYELL/FAR 8T 206�6231752; 3-27-96 ;11�42ASENT BY:ALSTON COURTNAGE 2068228297 413/20 . EXHIBIT A THE EASEMENT AREA.IS DESCRIBED AS A.. PORTION OF LOT 7 ACCORDING TO THE BURL.INGTON NORTHERN BINDING SITE PLAN AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 181 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 8 THROUGH 11:• RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOT 7, THENCE SOUTH 87°50'47" EAST ALONG THE NORTH UNE THEREOF 268.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 87°50'47" EAST 42.37 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°34'27" . WEST 22.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT.HAVING A RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37°09'39" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 84.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83`44'06" WEST 224.17 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 7 • AND THE EAST MARGIN OF UND AVENUE; THENCE NORTH 02°09'37" EAST ALONG SAID WEST UNE 30.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 83°44'06" EAST 219.73 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32°59'28"AN ARC DISTANCE OF 57.58 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 7 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ICONTAINING 9,126 SQUARE FEET OR 0.21 ACRES MORE OR LESS. • • legalth:47.1pt SENT BY:ALS'PON COUtUNAG1✓ ; 3-21-iti ;11:42AM ; 2ub:b2311b2-' ntib22040/4114/2u • __. _._..._. . EXHIBIT A 1 . g! . . 511 . : . .. . . .....,..,..,.... . .. ...'.1 ' • . • Am • 6 — "VITSP- ....._••-40-5,--4 _..,_.._ • rss . . 0 - ----- • . _...__....... i — ‘ 7 I : __+—. =q) • ___.:..._. ......__hi :: ... . . 1 y 101u fINNN 1, .1.1/ . V41111 •n gs\r_.. NdZ�09'37'E .ram ._ �1 • 1 R' lk . ••:.! . ":.. • .00•°C 1 iej I I a _ itl . g ,1136„,,4 ' . In - Fi • g R N,• I ••., ------ ripig : z )44, I , / «g i'il - i . I ) ... a • t ran a / , i MA hi ili \\.., (.71 ci bid . I P R g . NA 1 , \,\,.• k 4 55igm • • p . i kki!i I % \ ti- . 'Ai: or' ! \ � i 1 R Wir ,• 14 \ I i` r Ag a 1401z . '''' r-- 8 3 g i I.41 _-i viA ,• g IF . . .i.,„ , i ...ro x‘,;,\.\ \- • Fl . I •,..4t, 11 . - i itoi ,.. ----i'' \\\. \ s i .. i . ,,,,,,,04,0*• \,\... \ . • 100,4 \ ‘‘ \ . r .4 *IN• •%• s'. Va". . ..\ \ .. .. • 31 . 1 ki, %, ..-\:N. - - ... ..: .. .43 I 114101r1A.--\ii.-V iss;.. ... ---- - l i - • --off mI i t V4. , ► . De 99Vd V 4 H (GL8 ED= LY:OT 966i/411/c4 SENT•BY:ALSTON COURTNAGE ; 3-27-96 ;11:42AM 205:6231752-, • • 2Ub8228201;#1b/2U • • EXHIBIT B • • EX DRdi • • .. '. •;• . :': . • A • A • m O0 -1 to 4,�N i vy * CO In 9 -I0 - 1 .• ..; , • . . .. . 4 t • • • • ZB 39Vd V Q H 95LBLLe98L TE%TT 9i'•; • • • ;' . fit:.• On the Z61.% day of rY10..K.11 , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing • de;reV rnIVVIIIMS documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Qcfr `1 N qaus1n VvY avo 124951" ce • Lhkak., _. • lunm • �tSlneVte.� 'faa�td LZte.Cztnnal" � o �o u�va�. �csot.ure3a 1Zttck #1r.d.e vscv1 Tie ;t Af —1-vaansPa a-tav, • • Slue. —Qwnnc cif Sea-tt‘ .. tiuw avvt tsL wvAta" 1 Le., "t ecc VY1akcovn =ttShevles Hnudc.lesI, 1 tqh elRt'a. 1e✓vsCa�. 14bWe r (Signature of Sender) `e .Y tk. k o;27e_r • - • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS . COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that c5,4r1cL-iM *. Se&. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: a1 )914w 69 " (1� n�n rir tig 'II'. K, ..;` Notary Pub u- in o the J -shi tor, «?� �6t►1+• % Notary(Print) wt-# et I ri) * It *AWL My appointment expires? ,- , -4.4 41 at.tc r.. PrOject.lmber. (E, --OWL Sf NOTARY.DOC c: `. CITY F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 28, 1996 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 - SUBJECT: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on March 19, 1996: • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED FARWEST STEEL FACILITY LUA-96-022,SA,ECF The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of a vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building, a 660 square foot temporary office facility, and a 2,700 square foot office building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square . feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on April 9, 1996. Following the end of the comment/appeal period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton,Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. If you have questions, please call me at(206)277-6186. For the Environmental Review Committee, Jennifer Toth H nning Project Manager cc: Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Sue Rumery, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Rita Perstac, Puget Power AGNCYLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CR)This paper contains 50%recycled material.25%post consumer • CITY RENTON "LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 28, 1996 Mr. Barton Treece Horton Dennis&Associates, Inc. 320 Second Avenue South 0 Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: Faiwest Steel Facility Project No. LUA-96-022,SA,ECF Dear Mr.Treece: This letter is written on behalf of,the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on March 19, 1996, decided . . • that your project may be issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: See enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required 15 day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant)who may have an interest in the Committee's-decision. The required 14 day appeal period will run concurrently with the.comment period. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on April 9, 1996. • Following the end of the commenUappeal period, the City will finalize its Determination, unless comments received. require a reevaluation. • WAC 197-11-660 states that the responsibility for implementation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project, any mitigation measure established by the ERC not directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. Appeal procedures and mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at 277-6186. For the Environmental Review Committee, • bZ Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager • cc: Burlington Northern Railroad Properties, Inc./Owner Powell Orillia Associates, Inc./Owner DNSMLTR.DOC ' 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 T.:n..n..n.r.nnlninn q/pL.mvnlnrl.nelnrifll 9SN_nnN nnnm....n. ti CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): . LUA-96-022,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Horton Dennis&Associates, Inc. (Mr. Barton Treece)• PROJECT NAME: - FARWEST STEEL FACILITY, . DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of a vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I(would result in construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building, .a 660 square foot temporary office facility, and a 2,700 square foot office building. "Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at;build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. ;Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SW 34th Street, between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue MITIGATION MEASURES: • 1. The applicant shall be required to pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project (66,000/1,000 x 4.88 = 322.08 total trips); $75.00 x 322.08 = $24,156.00. This fee is due at the time of the issuance of building permits. I' 2. . The applicant shall be required to pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of$0.52 per square feet of building = 98,910 square feet x$0.52 = $51,433.20. This fee is payable at the time of the issuance of building permits. • i • MUME • ,I I As.Doca CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-022,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Horton Dennis&Associates, Inc. (Mr. Barton Treece) PROJECT NAME: FARWEST STEEL FACILITY DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of a vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 square foot - warehouse building, a 660 square foot temporary office facility, and a 2,700 square foot office building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A.total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. • LOCATION OF,PROPOSAL: ' SW 34th Street, between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue - • Advisory Notes to Applicant: . The following notes are supplemental information provided In conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only,they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. GENERAL: • 1. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City, state, county, federal and other jurisdictional regulations, codes and policies governing the project and site. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate submittals prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, according to City of Renton Drafting standards. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first$100,000, 4% of anything over$100,000 but less than $200,000; and 3% of anything over $200,000. One-half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. 3. The applicant is required to obtain a construction permit in order to accomplish site work and installation of site improvements. FIRE: 4. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,750 gpm. Six hydrants are required; one fire hydrant 150 feet of the proposed building and five hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 5. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 6. The access for Fire Department apparatus is acceptable as shown. All of the fire lanes shall be marked according to City Ordinance. - I• FARWEST STEEL FACILu ' LUA-96-022,SA,ECF t: 7. The City's Fire Mitigation Fee is required and is noted as a Mitigation Measure under the Environmental Review Committee Report Mitigation Measures. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of a building permit. UTILITIES General: 8. Each utility (water, sewer and storm drainage) is to be shown on separate utility sheets per City I I drafting standards. The applicant will include a Title Sheet with an index and legend for the project. Water: 9. A looped water system is required around the building since the required fire flow exceeds 2,500 gpm. Approximately 5,000 gpm of fire flow is'available with a 12 inch looped water system. 10. A new 15 foot utility easement will be required for water. A legal description of the easement .. must also be submitted for approval. The applicant must show the water easement (centerline and stationing). 11. The System Development Charge (SDC) charge for water is estimated to be $18,239.09 and is - payable prior to the issuance of the construction permit. This estimate reflects previous partial payment of water utility connection charges for the site. 12. The applicant must provide an Irrigation Plank with back-flow prevention device (double.check- valve assembly- DCVA). I 13. The applicant shall provide a Water Plan and Profile. These drawings must comply with City drafting standards. Wastewater II 14. The sewerline proposed to run underneath the building must be encased in a steel casing that extends 5 feet beyond the building. ! ; 15. The applicable Sewer System Development Charge is $0.078 per square foot of gross area, but not less than $585.00. The total estimated sewer SDC charge is$19,146.66 and is payable prior to the issuance of the construction permit. 16. Floor drains must be tightlined to the sanitary sewer system. 17. The Sewer;(Wastewater) Plan and Profile must comply with City drafting standards. 18. The sewer cleanouts are to be located within 5 feet of the building and every 100 feet thereafter. 19. The minimum slope for sewer to the property line is 2%to the right-of-way. 20. The floor elevation below 22 feet with require a backflow prevention device on the sewer line. 21. The applicant will show the top and invert elevation and approximate cover on their plans. The minimum amount of cover is two (2)feet. 22. The applicant will show the finished floor elevation on their plans. 2 FARWEST STEEL FACILITY LUA-96-022,SA,ECF 23. The vertical datum shown is NGVD 29. The applicant must show the equation with ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network (Net#1544 at intersection of East Valley Road SW and 34th Street NAVD 6.022 [meters]). (Note: NGVD 29 = North American Geodetic Vertical Datum 1929, NAVD= North American Vertical Datum 1988.) Storm Drainage (Surface Water): 24. The applicant's Drainage Report must state how it addresses King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) Special Requirements#5 and#6. 25. The Drainage Report must note any existing and predicted problems. The applicant will state how control run-off compares with the existing run-off. The applicant will state if the defined conveyance system elements will contain run-off without inundating or overtopping the roadway on Lind Avenue SW. 26. The applicant will state what is planned for KCSWDM Core Requirement#5 in their final report. 27. The System Development Connection charge is$0.129 per square foot of new impervious area, but not less than $385.00. Total charge is estimated to be $23,939.82 and is due prior to the issuance of the construction permit. 28. The applicant will provide a plan and profile of the Storm Drainage System to City Standards. 29. The vertical datum shown is NGVD 29. The applicant will show the equation with tie to the City of Renton survey control Net#1544 at the intersection of East Valley Road and SW 34th Street NAVD 6.022 (meters). TRANSPORTATION: 30. A six (6) foot sidewalk is required for the full length of the property frontage to SW 34th Street with the back edge of the sidewalk located at the property line and planter strip between the curb and sidewalk. 31. The applicant shall provide an Off-Site Improvement Plan using City of Renton standard details showing sidewalk and driveway details. 32. The project is subject to the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee. The fee is discussed under the ERC Report Mitigation Measures. The fee is estimated to be $24,156. and would be deposited to Account#105/599.318.70.00.160. POLICE: 33. It is recommended that any and all building materials be secured when not in use, provide security lighting at the construction site, lock up all building and construction tools, and any temporary construction and office trailers will need to have heavy duty dead-bolt locks and auxiliary locking devices on the windows. When the site is finished, it will require security lighting around the building and in the parking lots to help prevent thefts, vandalism and burglaries. Office areas will require dead-bolt locks. Back doors will require peep holes so employees can view the parking lots before exiting the building. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES: 3 T• 1 II r I FARWEST STEEL FACT n LUA-96-022,SA,ECF 34. The structural preload will require a separate permit and special inspection by the Soils Engineer. 35. The piling can be accomplished under a separate permit with a special inspection. 36. The foundation excavations are to be approved by the Soils Engineer prior to placement of concrete. 37. The structural engineer is to design for unequal settlement. 1 �I . l ,j I - I , I 4 • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-022,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Horton Dennis&Associates, Inc..(Mr. Barton Treece) PROJECT NAME: FARWEST STEEL FACILITY DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of a vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building, a 660 square foot temporary office facility, and a 2,700 square foot office building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SW 34th Street, between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal ' periods for this project will end at 5:00 p.m. on April 9, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. PUBLICATION DATE: March 25, 1996 DATE OF DECISION: March 19, 1996 SIGNATURES: // /A- Gregg Zin ma�administrator DATE Department f Pinning/Building/Public Works r' 6/ Sam Chastain, DATE Administrator V Community Service Department /6// Le Beeler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department DNSSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-022,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Horton Dennis&Associates, Inc. (Mr. Barton Treece) PROJECT NAME: FARWEST STEEL FACILITY DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of a vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building, a 660 square foot temporary office facility, and a 2,700 square foot office building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SW 34th Street, between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall be required to pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project (66,000/ 1,000 x 4.88 = 322.08 total trips); $75.00 x 322.08 = $24,156.00. This fee is due at the time of the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of$0.52 per square feet of building = 98,910 square feet x$0.52 = $51,433.20. This fee is payable at the time of the issuance of building permits. MITMEAS.DOC/ CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-022,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Horton Dennis&Associates, Inc. (Mr. Barton Treece) PROJECT NAME: FARWEST STEEL FACILITY DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of a vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building, a 660 square foot temporary office facility, and a 2,700 square foot office building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SW 34th Street, between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental Information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only,they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. GENERAL: 1. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City, state, county, federal and other jurisdictional regulations, codes and policies governing the project and site. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate submittals prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, according to City of Renton Drafting standards. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000, 4% of anything over$100,000 but less than $200,000; and 3% of anything over $200,000. One-half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. 3. The applicant is required to obtain a construction permit in order to accomplish site work and installation of site improvements. FIRE: 4. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,750 gpm. Six hydrants are required; one fire hydrant 150 feet of the proposed building and five hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 5. An approved fire sprinkler system is required tc be installed throughout the structure. 6. The access for Fire Department apparatus is acceptable as shown. All of the fire lanes shall be marked according to City Ordinance. • FARWEST STEEL FACILITY LUA-96-022,SA,ECF 6. The access for Fire Department apparatus is acceptable as shown. All of the fire lanes shall be marked according to City Ordinance. 7. The City's Fire Mitigation Fee is required and is noted as a Mitigation Measure under the Environmental Review Committee Report Mitigation Measures. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of a building permit. UTILITIES General: 8. Each utility (water, sewer and storm drainage) is to be shown on separate utility sheets per City drafting standards. The applicant will include a Title.Sheet with an index and legend for the project. Water: 9. A looped water system is required around the building since the required fire flow exceeds 2,500 gpm. Approximately 5,000 gpm of fire flow is available with a 12 inch looped water system. 10. A new 15 foot utility easement will be required for water. A legal description of the easement must also be submitted for approval. The applicant must show the water easement (center line and stationing). 11.. The System Development Charge (SDC) charge for water is estimated to be $18,239.09 and is payable prior to the issuance of the construction permit. This estimate reflects previous partial payment of water utility connection charges for the site. 12. The applicant must provide an Irrigation Plan with back-flow prevention device (double check- valve assembly-DCVA). 13. The applicant shall provide a Water Plan and Profile. These drawings must comply with City drafting standards. Wastewater 14. The sewer line proposed to run underneath the building must be encased in a steel casing that extends 5 feet beyond the building. 15. The applicable Sewer System Development Charge is $0.078 per square foot of gross area, but not less than $585.00. The total estimated sewer SDC charge is$19,146.66 and is payable prior to the issuance of the construction permit. 16. Floor drains must be tightlined to the sanitary sewer system. 17. The Sewer(Wastewater) Plan and Profile must comply with City drafting standards. 18. The sewer cleanouts are to be located within 5 feet of the building and every 100 feet thereafter. 19. The minimum slope for sewer to the property line is 2%to the right-of-way. 20. The floor elevation below 22 feet with require a backflow prevention device on the sewer line. 21. The applicant will show the top and invert elevation and approximate cover on their plans. The minimum amount of cover is two (2)feet. 2 FARWEST STEEL FACILITY _J LUA-96-022,SA,ECF 22. The applicant will show the finished floor elevation on their plans. 23. The vertical datum shown is NGVD 29. The applicant must show the equation with ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network (Net#1544 at intersection of East Valley Road SW and 34th Street NAVD 6.022[meters]). (Note: NGVD 29 = North American Geodetic Vertical Datum 1929, NAVD= North American Vertical Datum 1988.) Storm Drainage (Surface Water): 24. The applicant's Drainage.Report must state how it addresses King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) Special Requirements#5 and#6. 25. The Drainage Report must note any existing and predicted.problems. The applicant will state how control run-off compares with the existing run-off. The applicant will state if the defined conveyance system elements will contain run-off without inundating or overtopping the roadway on Lind Avenue SW. 26. The applicant will state what is planned for KCSWDM Core Requirement#5 in their final report. 27. The System Development Connection charge is $0.129.per square foot of new impervious area, but not less than $385.00. Total charge is estimated to be $23,939.82 and is due prior to the issuance of the construction permit. 28. .'...The applicant will provide a plan and profile of the Storm Drainage System to City Standards. 29. The vertical datum shown is NGVD 29. The applicant will show the equation with tie to the City of Renton survey control Net#1544 at the intersection of East Valley Road and SW 34th Street NAVD 6.022 (meters). TRANSPORTATION: 30. A six (6) foot sidewalk is required for the full length of the property frontage to SW 34th Street with the back edge of the sidewalk located at the property line and planter strip between the curb and sidewalk. 31. The applicant shall provide an Off-Site Improvement Plan using City of Renton standard details showing sidewalk and driveway details. 32. The project is subject to the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee. The fee is discussed under the ERC Report Mitigation Measures. The fee is estimated to be $24,156. and would be deposited to Account#105/599.318.70.00.160. POLICE: 33. It is recommended that any and all building materials be secured when not in use, provide security lighting at the construction site, lock up all building and construction tools, and any temporary construction and office trailers will need to have heavy duty dead-bolt locks and auxiliary locking devices on the windows. When the site is finished, it will require security lighting around the building and in the parking lots to help prevent thefts, vandalism and burglaries. Office areas will require dead-bolt locks. Back doors will require peep holes so employees can view the parking lots before exiting the building. 3 ' I AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION , vm Md Jessica Folkerts 33m being first duly sworn on oath Kzi states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the n xi' . _1• Z, VALLEY DAILY NEWS Zm z 600 S. Washington Kent, WA. 98032 1 . a daily newspaper published six (6) times week. Said newspaper is' a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six __ months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the ,. �o >Q-n� 0 n*, y m m.$� c n o m co— English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Wash- -4 *= s aK m m 52,2 < S>> c in ton. The ValleyDailyNews has been approved as a legal newspaper order o m war w m -v-o= a s a m 2.0® <• . 9 PP 9by o. w of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. a a v,-,Mat* f -_':.• 0 a ® w 43 -I °' = p, m z; The notice in the exact form attached, waspublished in the ValleyDailyNews a S F R % "'-` Q 2 _"E' ' a) g a iD --`-m�' o $ s - 0 c = -0 ci�tn z $ o:cin�o$ °nrtg$ -g?Dm msTcoalz' (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers a 2 2.= b g a n a s� o w < m m s 2.3 • during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a- * 3 a' 3 �O ! a roP 2-•-0 2 < a m car m 7 z • m �t w w �m aDQo »co®....,p,� Nmc.p� a D �d w_27mo. 7 A B i g G 5 2 0 0 0 ~7 W rg o a Kco ��G m ® a�oi°�wii. wmm ® 5. -sta. OO' was published on 1-25-96 m, •• -w2 "oNQ.2.0Fn-g ® mo �3 em u+ O ® • ® N C•� C S� (!J E.`* z a g; a '� a y '.Z,� o g ..5',P a iD W 7 co 7 llTTmll The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing -ubli tion is the sum-of -- .-. - r $ 47 .7 2 r\f C N� �O m 7 p al . . N Ers: 5.m 5 3 N-0 rD _• o m Qm ••. C -0n•� S., g, L 6al Clerk, Val ey Daily News'' ' a 312 ® * -P'13, m C O�.. N (n3 ��� - h-• Subscribed and sworn before me this 2 ay of t',+ _19 S ; 45 E•R s m ws la o offirguicardw.t. 14j,iiiiLe\ YNN..-30.L11,14 z . 2 , 5. = = (0 .�0 \;®�stot �••�/ `g Notary Public or the State of Washington n$(9 a ? 2 w• �61, 0 r�� �-; G,v, residing at A rn- . 86 ." ",r \0►ARk �,;�' o • King County, Washington - - , � ; --- : * 9 A,Q� t .Re sltl 92 0) ,C 0 • 4 ''�'®c 31 1°)° ' 0 .>O�- iNAS�'..0 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. FARWEST STEEL FACILITY LUA-96-022,SA,ECF The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of a vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 sq. ft. warehouse building, a 660 sq. ft. temporary office facility, and a 2,700 sq. ft. office building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 sq. ft. of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 sq. ft. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. The 15 day comment/14 day appeal periods for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 p.m. on April 9, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Publication Date: MARCH 25, 1996 y� Account No. 51067 C dnsmpub.dot _ ___ . , • inoTi . t ....ar-mh . , , .. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION FARWEST STEEL FACILITY LUA-96-022,SA,ECF The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of a • vacant 3.7 acre site fora steel distribution center. The site would be developed In two phases. Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 sq.ft.warehouse building,a 660 sq.ft.temporary office facility, and a 2,700 sq.It.office building. Phase 2 conslnlction would add 32,250 sq.ft.of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 96,910 sq.ft. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. ' YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION UNTIL 5:00 PM, . THE CITY WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL UNTIL AFTER THIS DATE. I —I APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM,_ IXXX I YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON APRIL 9,1996 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,APRIL 9, 1996. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. • 14. ,., :.�!,_�i t .yam'„ ...;IOW• . now 1, _ 1 ..\....t,•;,.,.. ..m.. i - I - 1 iw4C.: 1.-�-- �I emu, ) 1 p ! 1i .l? ,hill �I/i:.. �E-.3 it _.!A i --O o o a"...., ; '‘i / o .dD =_L I H / Il ilAi! == FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION _Plnn,n lnrl„rl.,Ho nrninrl NI I.IIQFG,..I.nn r+11:....i............�nl.._ -•r--•-� CERTIFICATION I, &A,YYA,t j . 1tu, So 1'1 , hereby certify that 3copies of the above document were poste by me in .� conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on NA,YUh Z'L, Ilci to Signed: CkyA.Ua-,J6Lai5 • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) • certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that S—ia-n.ccj 5c c S e.^ ;`,_'‘• '' •,.. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the or s G e.�..� y, and purposes mentioned in the instrument. .. • 4: �''.-~-� - • , en 'j1iE1`.„ • Dated: S I"� l°}' 1 a�IG ��� cr�-,�. vr: ti t` ~�� n ,,� . • � Notary Publi in and for the State of Washingtok `: f/ 6 cI/- /L/ Q Si _ it'w Z s- t •.,• Notary (Print) 0✓1 ,t.i Li,a *, 0,c ita 4 C • My appointment expire : Co- aq-q NOTARY.DOC ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION FARWEST STEEL FACILITY LUA-96-022,SA,ECF The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of a vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 sq.ft.warehouse building,a 660 sq.ft.temporary office facility, and a 2,700 sq. ft. office building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 sq. ft. of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 sq.ft. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION UNTIL 5:00 PM, . THE CITY WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL UNTIL AFTER THIS DATE. APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, XXX YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON APRIL 9, 1996 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, APRIL 9, 1996. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. Ma . len t... - I. 3 1 , .-.- s _ I t, , I _ I 9; C .-.,, i- it — IN Atillo 4 ! 11= \IIIIII�I p Nm.rr S P. 1 1 �g►d_ - MIT_" I LIB "liii I Lk p ik5r. . iMn =van i ••._ II.Ilk.9. P Ail. NI 9111.,I,�,4 � III' / ° N 114i,C =0 O �` 6111 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION : <:<>; <. <> . ease incl.0..e a .e"..ro ec..< : .BER w en callin for-. r:.o. er<,file:lde. <.:: _`:_: :<<>::>;.: 03/25/1996 17:06 2068228758 H D A PAGE 01 gn Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. HDA £wA� a , ®,b ' YFS N < 6 �, Consulting Engineers, Planners & Surveyors 96 R icy 6,4v0 41, FAX COVER DATE: j -94 TIME:. TO: COMPANY: 011 Q.ohtigi FAX #: FROM: jciiiik2-704 _ mt OUR FAX #: 206-822-8758 OPERATOR: The following document (including this cover sheet) is pages. • If any of these pages are not legible or you do not receive all the pages, please call the telecomunications operator as soon as possible. 320 Second Avenue South, Kirkland, Washington 98033-6687•Phone: (206) 822-2525 •Fax: (206) 822-8758 03/25/1996 1,7:06 206822B758 H D A PAGE 02 e- .--- —CURB CUT- - —4— --E _ 1 _,6--_. PO MAWVII) 112. ,:------t. — kiTER MN EW 6' YAM SIDEWALK W.--—__ •• '-°I. . - •'•r.-P- 12r1II ••--- TE-• I'M-14: (:)....---, .. r .. .-.-.,. .-..m7.., .. .. • .-..:1: ..‘;..-.:''11....21101.1.0-.1• rj45-\ - •"• -..ira,gria4 :::ii.Anie_.(i. - r_.... ______ [moo 1 idebaselaimara ....... 400.1 5' I a 1,7.,0 1 . . -4417.00 1 .0......2ai__- t:_ _ • . • -77:7—",--__ T- + 123.oc11 I I CONNECT TO EX: SANITARY SEWER 10' LAND-gbAteE it • / U TIU TY ESM T. -------,..„... '''''-;'40-. 1 a 045------: hp iti gl; S1RJB-OUT 4' ELEVATED _- 2 I II _ + illa= _} 12:,..i..... iti..1,171.falv ,__ * ---- 1 e SD (- .Z 1--- ik I!a so ft- . NAiEHOUS e TYPE I CB 1-------- . I f '20 A A 1 PROPOSED4 SAN. SEWER (TYPICAL\6------- ....... 1.:1) it "N„..,.., I : I . ..------- 12sLool -":1 . .......„:",_, .J1 / 'h21 / Ill 7-.4 ------ i .4 I i i i t d N E 1 //1 1.4 1 II / 1 6' ARL7 1-..... fli . i ...-- .1. / i ,---- ...- Lr ..... N P p2E72 --, . SANITARY srwER /al:7: : //,// /4° At i SERE AS REQ.° fi - ,/..,( tAR CH. PLANS) —*--1 10' U Ti / //. /..___ EASE T ' 1 . ArialallVe- / 11.41. / i . / 5krSRE a n.., " ;Illi / 0 I n pui , = 660 SQ. FT. go r yr- .. ____/ ,• TEMP. .celLEANOUVI '\ • S'n9 ALE 17.• . 4/• /4/111r// I .P.••• -.1.- I I 1 1 • '•ft \ ' wr , ry°P WA! / / / ....„. ... 6 • PROPOSED SAN. SE PROPOSED 1-1/2" IRR I MANHOLE /4/P/ METER. AND DOUBLE C WATER \ PROPOSED ir PVC SANITAwm. e / / di IN VAULT SEWER SERVICE • 2.00% .4 / 7. Ailile' . va 3 e Ae,.. _ ri-c4,7 . •-r"'" .0 01 IF4''''/' / gd, em././7 op..€0...• st oe'' d. "011.v 40Pr/ /X law- 1011° ;41:1•9° la/c11;, e- .,,,,,, ,x. • lit, s ,- - \ .0";00t z //i -- 11'1'1'11M I . b FUTURE 6 POO SC:LIFT. II I • ,..-.: -,00,".-. • . - ....... ...,,,, . 0-sisr-50 ig-4,. ' ....„._ ,.... , ,_ ............,---,....----- ,,,„, .....-- ) -Jrd-wesi .4.a-, - _.....--c- ..,...22„--,,,,,•• ..• ---- ..--- _ 4 yaettp...xite../lafreitPs7 --istO ..-)--- / PROPOSED 1 2' D.I. WATE :"- 14 --------- .....--'- _____...--„ :,...- ---- ______, ------/" / _. stko CO 24 kvti .- . 4A/ 1,14teiet) .1111441PG ‘'NAIY -----,, 1111111111111 „....7,- —1......7._--=‘--- —...._-- — 16 ------ ----,,,,,'5. ------ - .4 -•tews..----- _' — -____ --- NI3750.47W 517.58' xs"- - . ....... v ______I____1 A - __ ' Alt•Y'• City ofrio.:.on Department of Planning/Building/PubC_ -_.brks ENVIRONMENTAL, & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION3fR-EVIrEW SHEET rz (REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ¶'wtc, ?it-cut a,`-hch" COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 8, 1996 '" '"` u APPLICATION NO: LUA 96-022,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 29;1996 ..r . APPLICANT: HORTON DENNIS&ASSOCIATES PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING, '!_i PROJECT TITLE: FARWEST STEEL DISTRIBUTION WORK ORDER NO: 78063 CENTER 'LOCATION: SW 34TH STREET/BETWEEN EAST VALLEY ROAD AND LIND AVENUE SITE AREA: 3.67 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of 'a vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in (construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building, a 660 square foot temporary office facility, and a 2,700 square foot office ;building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total !amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Eby/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Alave, 'B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS I . Now-e, C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS f� ��j_ / cq/� Sri Qt.?.Lc j1/Le�t�i/�O � 't/�VLt.�- GLf 1- (614_ 4 �/ l Cie We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. • 117 3/7/94 Signature of Director or A orized Representative Date I DEVAPP.DOC Rev.ions oti�Y o� CITY OF RENTON �, FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • rat Y'PMEMORANDUM -'NTo DATE: March 6, 1996 TO: Jennifer Henning, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Code-Related Comments for Farwest Steel 1 . The preliminary fire flow required is 5,750 gpm. Six hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and five hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. Fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of building: 98,910 square feet x $0.52 = $51 ,433.20. This fee is payable at the time of building permit issuance. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 4. The access for Fire Department apparatus is acceptable as shown. All of the fire lanes shall be marked according to City Ordinance. CT:js Farwest v ►i - City of 7:o„ton Department of Planning/Building/Puts._ _._orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 'REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: cmAA 'Reg l — L 0AtiCOMMENTS DUE: MARCH 8, 1996 :APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-022,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 29, 1996 APPLICANT: HORTON DENNIS&ASSOCIATES PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TCMItfittelaON ,PROJECT TITLE: FARWEST STEEL DISTRIBUTION WORK ORDER NO: 78063 RECEIVEdn ;CENTER , 0 7 1JJ6 !LOCATION: SW 34TH STREET/BETWEEN EAST VALLEY ROAD AND LIND AVENUE id Yl6nlEA tltl NOd SITE AREA: 3.67 ACRES BUILDING AREA(gross): ^`m �o v soeoNAN SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of la vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in 'construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building, a 660 square foot temporary office facility, and a 2,700 square foot office ;building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total !amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water � LighVGla►e Plants Recreation LancMShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Eby/ Hlstork/Culfwal Natural Resources Preservation 13. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS IC CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional m Inforation is needed to properly assess this proposal. r 3/ ,/ 'Signature of Director or Authorized Representa;75 Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10iO3 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES EIS REVIEW COMMENTS FARWEST STEEL DISTRIBUTION By Clinton Morgan SW 34th St. Between Lind Ave.SW&E. Valley Rd. March 8, 1996 WATER: 1. A new 15-foot utility easement will be required for water. Approved legal description required. Show easement center line and stationing. 2. Required fire flow per Fire Prevention Department is 5,750 gpm. Therefore, Six(6) fire hydrants are require. One required within 150 feet of the building, but not closer than 50 feet. The remain hydrants to be within 300 feet. 3. A loop water system is required around the building if the required fire flow exceeds 2500 gpm. Approximately 5,000 gpm of fire flow is available with a 12-inch loop system. 4. One fire hydrant required for each 1,000 gallons of fire flow required for the building. 5. The System Development Connection charge for water is $ 18,238.09. 6. Each utility (water, sewer & storm drainage ) to be shown on separate sheets per City standards. Include Title sheet with index and legend for project. 7. Show location of dumpster. 8. Provide irrigation plan with DCVA. 9. Provide plan and profile. City of __.i ton Department of Planning/Building/Pub,ic-iWorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: aLe_l U)asjev. COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 8, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-022,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRU rat i e APPLICANT: HORTON DENNIS&ASSOCIATES PROJECT MANAGER: JEN,,ffFSi HENNING 'PROJECT TITLE: FARWEST STEEL DISTRIBUTION WORK ORDER NO: 78'. r `996 ;CENTER. LOCATION: SW 34TH STREET/BETWEEN EAST VALLEY ROAD AND LIND AVENUE O�Qytt � D%VbS OM SITE AREA 3.67 ACRES BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of 'a vacant 3.7 acre site fora steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building, a 660 square foot temporary office facility, and a 2,700 square foot office building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land'Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition I inform 'on is needed to property assess this proposal. • ". — 4e' 'Signature of Director or uthorized Representative ( Date DEVAPP.DOC Rw.10 93 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES EIS REVIEW COMMENTS FARWEST STEEL DISTRIBUTION By Clinton Morgan SW 34th St. Between Lind Ave. SW& E. Valley Rd. March 7, 1996 SEWER/ (Waste water): 1. Sewer line going underneath the building must be encased in a steel casing that extends 5-feet beyond the building. 2. The Sewer System Development Charge is $0.078 per square foot of gross area, but not less than $585.00. Total charge is $19,146.66. 3. Floor drains are to be tightlined to the sanitary sewer system. 4. Plan and profile required to City drafting standards. 5. Sewer cleanouts to be located within 5-feet of the building and every 100-feet thereafter. 6. Minimum slope for sewer to property line is 2% to right-of-way. 7. Floor elevation below 22-feet will require a back flow prevention device on the sewer line. 8. Show top &invert elevation and approximate cover on plans. Minimum cover is 2-feet. 9. Show finished floor elevation on plans. 10. Vertical datum shown is NGVD 29. Show equation with tie to City of Renton survey control Net # 1544 at intersection of E. Valley Rd. SW &34th St. NAVD 6.022(meters). STORM DRAINAGE (Surface Water): 1. Drainage Report needs to state how it addresses Special Requirement #5, 6. 2. The report should note existing and predicted problems. State how control run-off compares with existing run-off. State if the defined conveyance system elements will contain run-off without inundating or overtopping the roadway on Lind Ave. SW. 3. State what is planed for Core Requirement# 5 in final report. 4. The System Development Connection charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious area, but not less than $ 385.00. Total charge is $23,939.82. 5. Provide plan and profile of the Storm Drainage System to City Standards. 6. Vertical datum shown is NGVD 29. Show equation with tie to City of Renton survey control Net # 1544 at intersection of E. Valley Rd. &SW 34th St. NAVD 6.022(meters). 96CM054 City of Benton Department of Planning/Building/Pubt_ ..Jrks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:lea\ ov-ta.+l.0A, COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 8, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-022,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 29, 1996 APPLICANT: HORTON DENNIS&ASSOCIATES PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: FARWEST STEEL DISTRIBUTION WORK ORDER NO: 78063 -—y OF RENTON CENTER LOCATION: SW 34TH STREET/BETWEEN EAST VALLEY ROAD AND LIND AVENUE r"Fr1 2 19AS SITE AREA: 3.67 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): Ni SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and EnvironmentaliRdVi 3�for'`"t'Fie development� of a vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building, a 660 square foot temporary office facility, and a 2,700 square foot office ;building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation f/ Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation • e Z-1M cf-1 4 r 2 V/-C4i) B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 'C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ey`�� �� /' -�'1 ��/ ��UG' -��� ram, /”'" Signature of Director or Authorized Representati ( Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES EIS REVIEW COMMENTS By Clinton Morgan SW 34th St. Between Lind Ave. SW&E. Valley Rd. March 7, 1996 TRANSPORTATION: 1. Off-site improvements required is 6-foot sidewalk the full length of the property frontage to SW 34th St. with the back edge of sidewalk located at the property line and planter strip between the curb and sidewalk. 2. The transportation mitigation fee is as follows: 63,300 + 2,700 = 66,000 Sq. ft. of office Trip rate per ITE trip generation Manual is 4.88 per 1000 Sq. Ft. 66,000 / 1,000 x 4.88 = 322.08 total trips Cost per trip generated is $75.00. Therefore: $75.00 x 322.08 = $ 24,156.00 Deposit $24,156,00 to City designated account. Acc. # 105/599.318.70.00.160 • 3. Provide off-site improvement plan with City Of Renton standard details showing sidewalk and driveway details. • • gED .::::::::. .::.:...................... 111111111111111111111TRANSPORTATIO:NinimmnoNgfEemmouggs :::.::.:.:.:::::::::::::::r:::::::.:.:: Project Name S &/ , /J 1 S7 Y1h;-�fi�G Project Address tt •,S L) ._ 4 - ' Contact Person 73air�P 1 ��� L' /�i lrfcYJ��ri vi 5 / e Address .��� .��Cc�7�1C� ��—' ��u�f�' f �� y.'i1�aY,c� 1��� � C'' Phone Number (-2 6) �-Z. -- Permit Number Project Description - cG eG/ /s1)--i I :-i / �yj ki,F 'ehG-�i�S� Land Use Type: Method_,of�C Iculation: ❑ Residential 0'TE Trip Generation Manual ❑ Retail ❑ Traffic Study g?"-i fon-retail 0 Other4411e ?r pS Calculation: G 3 , 3bO wa eL,c,w 4 6 � pogo v x 4, Fly `� 3 �z— ,c_- 2) too 1 640 o — of 41, 7-1 b� Transportation Mitigation Fee: - 2*) Calculated by: t _ 777 Date: , J 7L Account Number: 105/5RR', 318, 70.00, 160 Date of Payment 1 ,= / City of::o.;ton Department of Planning/Building/Pub Forks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: FcuitiLs COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 8, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-022,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 29, 1996 APPLICANT: HORTON DENNIS&ASSOCIATES PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: FARWEST STEEL DISTRIBUTION WORK ORDER NO: 78063 CENTER LOCATION: SW 34TH STREET/BETWEEN EAST VALLEY ROAD AND LIND AVENUE SITE AREA 3.67 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of a vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building, a 660 square foot temporary office facility, and a 2,700 square foot office building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major information Impacts impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LandrShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Enemy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS r?,0 , (7/4/24.0Cel---—71-0 pcvdc4-. , C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ,G1 740 f2A ;l We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional information Is needed to property assess this proposal. Cea—} :----- L...--- 3/;. /Wp Signature of Director or Authorized Representat D to DEVAPP.DOC Row.10/93 Ii CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 8, 1996 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning FROM: Rebecca Lind STAFF CONTACT: Paul Cohen (277-5578) SUBJECT: Far West Steel Warehouse LUA-96022 -Long Range Planning Comments 1. Intent of the Land Use Designation The site is designated Employment Area - Industrial (EAI). This designation is intended to "create and sustain industrial areas which function as integrated employment activity areas". Primary uses in the EAI should be industrial, but secondary uses, including warehousing are encouraged. New industrial development in the Green River Valley should be well landscaped with provisions for safe and convenient pedestrian circulation. 2. Areas of Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan The following policies support the proposal. Economic Development Objective ED-C: Sustain and expand the current industrial and manufacturing (heavy and light) employment base. Policy ED-15. Develop strategies to attract manufacturing and industrial jobs. Employment Area PolicyLU-154. Asa priority, railroad transport should be encouraged as an alternative to heavy P ty P truck transport. Railroad facilities in industrial areas should be protected from adverse development. Employment Area-Industrial Objective LU-EE: Create and sustain industrial areas which function as integrated employment activity areas and include a core of industrial uses and other related businesses and services, transit facilities and amenities. November 28, 1995 Page 2 Policy LU-195. The primary use in the Employment Area - Industrial designation should be industrial. Policy LU-196. A mix of offices, light industrial warehousing and manufacturing should be encouraged as the secondary uses in the Employment Area-Industrial classification with conditions as appropriate. Policy LU-199. Developments which generate significant, incompatible non industrial traffic during industrial working hours should be discouraged from locating in these areas. 2. Areas of Potential Inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan At the level of specificity shown on the submitted materials, no inconsistencies with the policies are noted. 3. Advisory As the proposal is refined, the following policy guidance should be considered by the applicant and reviewing City staff. Policy LU-161. Street trees and landscaping should be required for new development along Oakesdale and Lind Avenues and SW 34th in the Green River Valley to provide an attractive transition from the office uses in the northern part of the Valley to the industrial/manufacturing uses in the south. Policy LU-162. On-site open space and recreational facilities in developments should be required while allowing for flexibility of design. Policy LU-203. Off-site impacts from industrial development such as noise, odors, light and glare, surface and ground water pollution, and air quality should be controlled through setbacks, landscaping, screening and/or fencing, drainage controls, environmental mitigation and other techniques. Policy LU-206. Site plan review should be required for all new projects to ensure a high level of quality in site development. Policy LU-207. Parking should be located internally to the site and landscaped as appropriate to mitigate adverse visual impacts. Policy LU-208. The use of parking structures should be encouraged through incentives. Policy LU-209. Safe, convenient pedestrian movement should be encouraged through appropriate access and the location of facilities on sites such as covered walkways, drop-off zones, kiosks, security lighting, and covered bus stops. Policy LU-210. Industrial uses should provide adequate buffers for less intensive, adjacent uses, e.g. setbacks,fencing, intensive landscaping. Policy LU-211. Site design and zoning designations should be used to protect environmentally sensitive areas in applicable industrial employment areas. A:IFARWEST.DOC City of i on Department of Planning/Building/Publ— —arks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: IGut t✓ COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 8, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-022,SA, CF "—' DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 29, 1996 APPLICANT: HORTON DENNIS&ASSOCIATES PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: FARWEST STEEL DISTRIBUTION WORK ORDER NO: 78063 .CENTER LOCATION: SW 34TH STREET/BETWEEN EAST VALLEY ROAD AND LIND AVENUE SITE AREA 3.67 ACRES BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of a vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building, a 660 square foot temporary office facility, and a 2,700 square foot office 'building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information impacts impacts Necessary - Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Ught/Glare Plants Recreation LandShorellne Use utiimea Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Eby/ Histak/1Cultural Natural Resources Preservation B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. itt66n4 qs/wv Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 City of liwiion Department of Planning/Building/ ..irks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Fo1 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 8, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-022,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 29, 1996 APPLICANT: HORTON DENNIS&ASSOCIATES PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: FARWEST STEEL DISTRIBUTION WORK ORDER NO: 78063 CENTER LOCATION: SW 34TH STREET/BETWEEN EAST VALLEY ROAD AND LIND AVENUE SITE AREA 3.67 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): C /C) S I • IQ er- ' SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of a vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building, a 660 square foot temporary office facility, and a 2,700 square foot office building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS .l t 611 Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Alr Aesthetics Water Light/Glare I Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities I Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services �- Energy/ HIstorIc Cultural Natural Resources Preservation 51 ., 15 police calls for service estimated annually , based on the size of the buldin The SouthRenton area has sustained a large number of commercial burglaries and thefts of construction materials for the past 1 1/2 years , due to all of the new construction underway. Recommend that any and all building materials be secured when not in use , provide security lighting at the construction site , lock up all building and constructon tools , and any temporary construction/office trailers wil need to have heavy duty dead-bolt locks and auxiliary locking devices onthe window Once the site is finished , it will need security lighting around the building and B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS in the parking lots to help prevent thefts , vandalisms and commercial burglaries . Office -areas . will need dead-bolt locks , and any back doors will need peep-holes soiemployees may view the parking lots before exiting the building. Because this business will be mostly a 24- hour operation , changes of burglary will be less than that experienced by other businesses . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 'We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information needed to properly assess this proposal. Otja&11 in( (4° Sig Lure of Director A Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.1 W W City'6r:-4enton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING CoArkskuak— &matt COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 8, 1996 (APPLICATION NO: LUA 96-022,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 29, 1996 APPLICANT: HORTON DENNIS&ASSOCIATES PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HgNNI 0.„% [( tl `Abe-PIV PROJECT TITLE: FARWEST STEEL DISTRIBUTION WORK ORDER NO: 78063 - CENTER w-- I fru" 2 9 1996 LOCATION: SW 34TH STREET/BETWEEN EAST VALLEY ROAD AND LIND AVENUE ,SITE AREA: 3.67 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): EllJ"�164'tle a.a •-sa 1r r;S,ON SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of a vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in ;construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building, a 660 square foot temporary office facility, and a 2,700 square foot office building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total 'amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. 1 A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities 'Animals Transportation ' Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistoricJCuitural I Natural Resources Preservation B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 1- $'f0 \ LT U 2il(i 0P.Lt_ A® K&D IkE., S�pR Q Al'E Pge P (T Pa06 5P hb itO5Peclioh BY lig S'a(CAS C'll - PI(Amu LIk1 s011QA1.i, vA l'illf ?vat cif& i iPoth). 1 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS I- C86 NatI1LDF aw1 tUi TVim% t kg iPPaoU an 13y bo [LS eft UtNe . P fi(o Q :CD puh&alayi 0P et2 6 C,IZ 6f‘i We have re ,wed this a adon with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where i.I �`7f %7 to properly assess this proposal. 3/146' Sign- of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 FARCorporation DAVE FORESTER Vice President jojogo vi/avof Finance yaz e,e.or, ille6"e".":") ///31° ' . 644A4/#251- 46.1j °Q- a7"\ • (1 41/Ce ," sozie 4A7e144.4j1 led\-- • p 54°1/4 461)'. aoloS 4,1244Yj 424-i 7P-1111-1-A (ige--24-‘1-77-"k)C 4as•jr- DEVELOPMENT PLANNwr CITy OF" FEB 2 6 1396 R EC E 2000 Henderson Avenue • Post Office Box 889 • Eugene, Oregon 97440 • 503/686-2000 •.,•/:::::.:•::.:,+:•.t:.:.....;r.r r.:...})if•::r:Cn!•r.r.>.`.`;s: SS"4:'r$i %r}�^iSS•'!• Si.�}}'.:i�:'%;•S+`.•:ScT'r:'))ii•f': ::/.,.:rr:•.,•}r:::r.•:::.$r.?•}r}tY'Y.:•y,•i;:;}:r .};;T r;}::•: :�..y,., .;,%�. .S`irWi,.f: •..// si :`�$'•:k^;S%�:`•?i22�i�?s:.... ..+4.r .;./:y?!:i;+.}:�.. (��'}� :ar• �.}: .f• .r ,+r:i•'Y t:Y;p r;•r:•r !:•� •: •:.•S.•:::w:.tn}!•i :{.}i:•r.<nT:+.:.t. ri:.:.•.,tL}}:•SY'{:•::•>:...r rs•../.w i •: r/•.{+.r '''r'::+..f;yr;,. //.•'I/i Y! •!!ri• r r r,', / . •::.a•!$.0.,•,•;.>•::{ her <n.Cl>�".k• .:ar.:: rr:r},..::r�s<+ •.}.n:<ni:•}%r:%SSS'•r.• T� f(�f.;Q��4:;+(.%•••:: :,•:i./,n{rr..r/,Ci/i�h./ :r.;/;{/r.;J/��r<Srr,/i�fr. ..4.. ...u.:.':.••;{.};:•i:s2k;}:x•Y}:•:. }'.+.:..::•:,?<;sn•:,;%•r.•.,s........s..../.tr.. .::�.,•"#:•.!r.,!4 r.S.. nS%�.. :I .!i:.:r rir•5i:./rr/.r.•.r••.�ri/ r I •>:;r::�i$$:C.r};,.{,.v:v.v••::•$:::.v::.,,•::•:::.:• :::.: .::..:......vvrr.... ::..:::::r:::::::r.•:r•:}:::•}}ra}}..... .Yr'.:r.....,r.t rn;t;w.{•:;;4.4;'{:..;.;.{..u,.}}}t{:••/.:•/rF.�':•:H r.. .{ ../.;r.r v:!•%.:. .!/�: r ::.y.v:.v:•:.:•r�•;{•.•;:.}:.:..w.v::::m:},•;r.::,.T,+i',?t:::•::n;}:::$}Y.•:{'•'?•T:•t{..:...•: ..;.;....:... .:. ,f.........:;" ,;, ..•x:r.+w:+Y'{S%:.}�}//.�}::+.•:•^i.S•r'•:;q•:.f:�{{•1t+r K•r.+�i'$ ..ti::v:y T:?:::.va}Y.;}::::}.;•:•::::::::::yv .v:,!.•,•;.\.::•:•:::x:iv:r.•. ?v.•l,•f.f•r?:•:uv:.•r:::. n:.:.t•:r::Y:r:^:rv::.n::.i: {:i:: rr/i.r: T:iY.{t:�.•:.v.}w:{:%.i;:.}}v'•}}}}}•}::.: .v;},.:}:}:::•f+.,•.••:. F ::{•:::•.:v:::r:x:::t:::n•:::n•:::x::.v:�:.:r::?•:•:•::4.�{+r..::::.;.:.. :...v....;;...:.:•}}:...:.. ■MM`■.��••y yL0�'M>~t��`;S�R?11:i�ES:::i��...t ::.v::.v..w.............v:::."' v:r.•.;r•:+::.•:???^:Y:v:: M. M ,...,...........,........:....,. ..:}::,w•::,...v.v:;.::,{{.;;;.r n}:4:.4., •.{•$:::}. •h�. . .r Qf•:•.4:w::::::::::....v:...�......:v: .. ..:...:::::.....:::;w::..n.,n,...,......}:•::A•.....:. }}�:<`%.�}:}�::5•$i:.::::in: ��:•'�ft• '.:iii:•�. :•� n }...r:::::rr::::w:::;:{+•rr:.�::::.:::E,,:+.v?:::.?:n}•'{:):..T :{•:.::..:.:..::..}..::•v�:.::.:.v:�•:.v.•n�::,::}::.:•nk:..:}}:. , .. ..... ...,;i.::,,$T;...,,}..;;,. ,.: ::.:}`.:::?•:?:•:t•+:•:.:.: .}.sh.,.•}, fir.:•.'•:};':;.. ..... �....: .... :::..:. .i . :. { }. .,.`' '• .'y': � v. '' .. ... ; � :}. ? � •. :•:titer�'.aa'•::� ■N+■■■-w^�7 R� /rv�. ?:: "$'i:O' •N.E. $:;Y;:;:yt$Y:; .... .. ... .............................n.........�......... ..::w:•:•:}...........:..........:.:.:x::::.vnv:•:•.v:n;{{n}}}:•.}•:::.:}:n'•Yy}• •r::::::::...r::•r.•::•:r:•}::}}i:•'i.•::.n v:}:n}:i ...................a:........,................:,::.•.:.............r.............. .. ..... ...:.:. .• ...�..............::.::•:l•''+y:•:/'•r:$:+r:+4+•'lr.•Y�:}T:•i:•�r:•i$$;{tiir$:•}i}+.%ii f:':.n:•irr:i:•ri/.4: ..}}4:'}:'$i$:•$'C�:��Y�$'�:•?y�;{:<:};$$•:::•}:�$$$$i:•i$;`.:•$:•$::•.v:k•::4$:•i.`•:•i: 9� ��O V:•,:$:;:;::::.r.... .1..:::;•..v::w::::....r.....r....r rr:::::•r::.:v::: PROJECT NAME: F eta Ce APPLICATION NO: c1( -812. SPt t ( L ' • • The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the; s•tF6::jec E site. Me Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. • NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL Burlington Northern Railroad 1011 Western Ave, Ste. 700 NUMBER Properties, Inc. Seattle, WA 98104 • 125360-0010-07 Burlington Northern Railroad 1011 Western Ave, Ste. 700 Properties, Inc. Seattle, WA 98104 125360-0060-06 East Valley 34 LLC 2001 Western Ave, Ste. 330 Seattle, WA 98121 125380-0030-09 Consolidated Freightways PO Box 3175 . • Attn: Financial Acct Deot. Portland, OR 97208 125380-0050-04 Arensberg Investments PO Box 88932 Seattle, WA 98188 125381-0010-02 HCWA Realty Corp. 3345 Michelson Dr. c/o Homebase Support Ctr.• Irvine, CA 92715 125360-0020-05 Burlington Northern Railroad. 1011 Western Ave, Ste. 700 Properties, Inc. Seattle, WA 98104 125360-0070-04 Seattle Fur Exchange . `200 SW 34th St. PO.Box 88159 Seattle, WA 98138 125380-0040-07 A & H Company • ' PO Box 2547 Kirkland, WA 98033. • 125380-0060=02 Sabey, David A. 101 Elliott Ave West . Seattle, WA 98119 125381-0020-00 • • FEB 271996 • 1/, LL'rct �r�rtc w' PLANNING u c�,` `` • CITY OF RENTON • c Ur f• C • • ' • • (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) , r .:(Continued) • • • NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • 1 • • • I •• AppTice.rrI { °1.Tlifile:gdk ?' I, ti �s. � ya.i vie'. , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property y ! . 1 (Print Name) 1 owners and their addresses were obtained from: 0 City of Renton Technical Services Records ' 0 Title Company Records ,D` King County Assessors Records , 1. Signed1 't Date -if .91c (Applicant • osisilest uu, C NOTARY �•`'Z'''`S$10N�F,,,/<c ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and4,70 gtote4 gton, residing at antes-c.c. Sp4owomisRr, Co, on the l'1 day of Fee A' ' ® , " . i, cps: P. G =' 0 Signed �.A- -. ---7 eL1 (Notary Public) (3 CP6e s roll=itc. •♦.F„',h,„ ,q`,,,C9 4, ;il.41 4... •:::::;•;;?:::ii}:^ :• :••»:•}•}}:::;;•:::v. :: L'i:•:..... ..: :: '. �:+ .' �:' ......:.:.:: ::.:::•:::: . .i' r,: :.. • :•i:•}:::c•;,y}}}:fi}:•}::•i.. • i f.Ren n• s .................. .......... MAILI: h r''notices.ate o osed><a cat . I;.,.., ;. . :. ;;•. .,•':�, .'; .. .•:�:hereb.Y:;certify:ttiat;:.. ...: .::�:; : :�P...:.P:::.:.:...:: ..PP: ; :: «�»::;::<:::. 0 e�m 1 it E P a.Y. 'WRe ................. 0 ::....max::::;•.v•: :v::iv:• :':: •}t•. ::•..:.:.';i4:4:�ii?i};i:>.�ii;::j}y:isv:ii:v}}i:?�:j;}•i:4:b:;;;::'•}:'i::•ry};..�:•:•:}:;;<:;. ...... :�•!iii::::;i :y:r:%:%:L%:•ii`?:�i:�:::;`.;:;:;:i"}:i%:;:::,ir�::�}ii: N}.,TARP'"��:` <><<':i�«?`iii'?< i?<>�':<> i..'K>'??' <�'> `?`��` f:: iiStR ATTEST.•> .Sus nbed::a.nds.wurn:.befo a i„ghan®>s : . . ary> iu61c :! ....... .::t, e:at.:.:: ; : ::::. .y.Jt::•:,::::•;;::.:>: ♦.. ., ii:... ::' : ::;::::1•:}:.::::•:.�. .:. : ::• ::.• ..::::::•.• :: .}.ry?::,.i .::tic•:%i}';:•::i}:;:ii:.• .:..::.... 1 • : :. .; ''.':.::: :: :::: : ,:,;;�;, :k:.:.r,:<..:..:....:...,...: : : : ::;;:,} ; :: :: :: ::: , ;:: :Si ned::.:::.::.:,. .;:. :: • • ••••••• ,1 neipopioo . ' T G u_ii�Z REV 07/e5 (/a / NOTICE OF PROPOSED i'E APPROVAL AND ENVIRC 1.1JIENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Administrative Site Approval (SA) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: FARWEST STEEL DISTRIBUTION CENTER/LUA-96-022,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of a vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building, a 660 square foot temporary office facility, and a 2,700 square foot office building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. GENERAL LOCATION: SW 34th Street, Between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. I 1 \. 1 I 1 3 �^ e Ir. ����� 3 tE ■I ii 4 1P �-J ,1�=\\IIIIIIIIIII 1 I Y I 1 1 � 4r�•OII 3 `i --%11 116 _ �tlhnI I 'y � M ■ um _ �I . LL. 1 c it a iti I / /„ T s3i R-km.��i An Mtoil lij: t I p � C:r.�1 i �, 10 �r'o N , ./,ii r t( ,f 1 I / , rg - 1 NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP GENMALOT.DOC w....-- r PENDING APPLICATIOW . • PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: FARWEST STEEL DISTRIBUTION CENTERILUA-96-022,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of a vacant 3.7 acre site fore steel distribution center.The site would be developed In Iwo phases.Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building,a 660 square foot temporary office facility,and a 2,700 square fool office building.Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided:Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. GENERAL LOCATION: SW 34th Street,Between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit _Preliminary Plat _Short Plat . _Conditional Use Permit _Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval • XXXX Environmental Review _Shoreline Conditional Use _Other Permit _Fill 6 Grade Permit _Shoreline Substantial _Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative site plan approval.Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's'Notice of Application'publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application,or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations,appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s)far this project,please contact the Development • Services Division al 235-2550. II .��I1',W'I \ j A -I //_/_ .,I j 1i � _. __ lit r+�_ T71___ �- 1,2 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER-FILE tDENTIFICATION:i,' '" • CERTIFICATION I, c Y1 S(ki/bcuYI , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were poste y me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on Pla,rhh , ion(p l Signed: S,L1 G NJa c • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) : �, Pl I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ` ll +'ia�i1't /�, signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary,fttt;f4!' tbe ust,§ • and purposes mentioned in the instrume' a V t`�F � .7 hliiii �' / �i �/ .L:Dated: f ��� .1_<�� .L.. fit/ ,", Notary„ blic in f for the State of-W• ashin ton . Notary (Print) / ��s- ' �Gc� /. . rC_ f/L My appointment expires: ' Mar NOTARY.DOC ,.. ._ . . . . . . IN01.7 rio . PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: FARWEST STEEL DISTRIBUTION CENTER/LUA-96-022,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks administrative Site Approval and Environmental Review for the development of a vacant 3.7 acre site for a steel distribution center. The site would be developed in two phases. Phase I would result in construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse building,a 660 square foot temporary office facility,and a 2,700 square foot office building. Phase 2 construction would add 32,250 square feet of warehouse to the west side of the Phase I warehouse. Total amount of new buildings at build-out would be 98,910 square feet. A total of 50 automobile parking spaces would be provided. Access would be from SW 34th Street and from Lind Avenue. GENERAL LOCATION: SW 34th Street,Between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue PUBLIC APPROVALS: • Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat Conditional Use Permit Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use Other Permit Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's"Notice of Application" publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. ■ I ![ pp �4 1 I !I, IICn/1.n' --i- „I 11.1 y �' r.: �I J' ,it � ..., NI: L ] J UMW a � ri iJ N1 NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL NAP PLEASE INCL DE!T H E PROJECT NU B Ri:. HEN>CALLING.:FOR:PROPER FILE IDFNTIFiCATION`3< <::%:;. 2" .z CITY JF RENTON %. - "LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 29, 1996 Mr. Barton Treece ' Horton Dennis and Associates, Inc. 320 Second Avenue South Kirkland, WA 98033 ' SUBJECT: Farwest Steel Distribution Center ' Project No. LUA-96-022,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Treece: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has formally accepted the . above-referenced application for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on March 19, 1996. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application for environmental review. Please contact me, at 277-6181, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 161 b -416,144/193 • • ---JJennifer Toth Henning Project Manager . cc: Burlington Northern Railroad Properties, Inc./Owner . Powell Orillia Associates, Inc./Owner ACCPTLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,25%post consumer :.�::•.y:.�:?._?::.?;::::?.:•}'rvir:..:.:.:..:L:.�:n,?.:....::::::n..{.:'{:::r:}}:.n;.n.. :?:.}:.�:::.n ..........4:?i rii.... �•.f... • :ii}i}:�:•:•:•}}:4%•}'f.�ii}YlS�'r:`v:�i::}:yi;;�:•}:•:•:::;:'i:?;:??:r:•,:�:;::?',:•}::;•,:?y:•}}:r}i:+r'!:i:•i:�:?;}}' :}:?•ir}'r.::.::.:r.•.�::..}'.}•:::;:.:.}..+ � f......: ...........r.......................::::::.•::.�::w:.�:::::::.�:::.�::::.�:::::.........:::::.: .:.:::.......••:v:, ... .......�::.:...r...... I n:�:::F.:p}:Y:?i•:•}:?:4:}:•}:v:4:•r:?•:'4.•r f.•+•:w::F .: ......................v........:w.env..:......:.................:.:::r::::n�::n:w:::?: ::{.}iY r}:•i}}i}i}:J:.. . .. . :::..:}:4:?Y:•:.............: .............F.:f/...............:.. ,...• • '�•1}ii}:4i}Xiry}}�ti??{•i:?•}Y.. '}r}/ i ........... ... Dl :[SI.ON:.>:;}<::.:?:}:.>:??.}:. }:.>}'.:�'.}';..:.:?.:.}:.:?.}:?.;�.}}:.:.;':.... r.r.ff r?:.:::.:::.::.:.... •.:?.<;}>:.}:.:..r.:........ ::. ...:........r' E1J:EEO.PMEIVT S.ERV[. .ES. .V:................:.................:...:.. r�: ..r ,..::.:::::::::.:.::..... is >`PRO EC:: :?I . FORM 0 c t .lease'y tta' `ar additional'.`. Note;:'[Fthei?e:isrino�e:ifanoneiepel.owner,..p:ea;}:•>a.}:.:�h ,:_:.....:.;;..:.::.;.:•. •" "•".:Master:Appication.fdr.eachcwner::;::; : :::: :: :.: EXISTING LAND USE(S): NAME: BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD PROP ERTIES, INC. SITE IS CURRENTLY VACANT ADDRESS: 1011 WESTERN AVE SUITE 700 PROPOSED LAND USES: • DISTRIBUTION FACILITY FOR FARWEST STEEL CO., INC. • CITY: SEATTLE, WA ZIP: 98104 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: IM ZONING TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 467=3446 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: :?;?<.}:.,,>1,}:..::;::}:;:•7 ::'` <>``` ;'°> IM USES ::< > <:::>::<»>> > C:ONTO►GT>P.ERSO:N.(APP.L,.:Cp►N:...:::::.::...::.:..:.::..: NAME: HORTON DENNIS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. • EXISTING ZONING: . CONTACT: MR. BARTON TREECE IM ADDRESS: 320 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH PROPOSED ZONING: • `CITY: KIRKLAND, •WA ZIP: 98033 IM SITE AREA (SQ.FT. OR ACREAGE): TELEPHONE160,042 SF (3.67 AC) • NUMBER: (206) 822-2525 PROJECT VALUE: • PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: $5,000,000.00 FARWEST STEEL FACILITY IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: SW 34TH ST RENTON No • BETWEEN E. VALLEY RD. AND LIND AVE. IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE.AREA? KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): • No RECEIVED 125360-0080 FEB 2 7 1996 • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY iY(IF FtFtNTnto >::::<:::;:»::::::,::><::::::::: GAL DESCR 0.11(... F..PR PE :: ><:<: ::::;::<::: » I O ..... 0 .. RT.Y.. Attach„.. >:>: :: : >: ::::::.::::::.�:.:::..�::..�... .. . ........................(....... . . ....... .. e.;;sheet.>If::ngc:t~ssar:..: :;::.;;:.:<.>:.::.::.:.:>;; .:.::..;:: i BURLINGTON NORTHERN BINDING SITE PLAN, LOT B AS MODIFIED BY LOTLLINE ADJUSTMENT' • RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR.'S NO. 9511-2990-06 PE OF. .PL :.'::::::.;::::.:..:::.:•:•,:.:::::::: on..t s..t I --Cit ... f .. .11l> ..... ......:. ..:........ ........ C....e.c...a.l...a . ..I.cat(........ e. .. hat.a s d .termtn .:f -<:<:::>:::<::<:::<::«:::::»::>:<:::»::>::::::::::>; : :::::;>::::;::: :>:::>:<:>:: :»:<>:<:::::<>:. ............ .. . .....pP.........................YP . .. pP.:: .... ::...:ta:.:.f...:.w.::......e. . .. .e....ees,::::::::::::::::::.::::...:...:........ .. _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ i' _ REZONE $ ' LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ — SPECIAL PERMIT $ . _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ — GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ _ VARIANCE CU. YDS: ) $ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ "'•: . (FROM SECTION: ) . PRELIMINARY _WAIVER • $ I FINAL —WETLAND PERMIT $ - — ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: •,; _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ ' _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ . �.:: ' ' .i »: :: :;:>::>':'::<::>>: :» FF A. .IT..OF.•:.OWNERSHIP..... ..........:................................................ I, (Print Name n e. 7J €try.4.=declare that I am(please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,j'the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge end belief. r.� ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me,a NotirryRpbljg,�in and (NaG/ . `iaep4 t for the State of(,t�ASu1/liJ iesiding at csrtd.1 `1L�, M/e�', Na e of Owner/Representative) Sf�louomtstA Cou.A.- , on the l3aday,st i,\'tttttttt,,,CIj..©, FEB¢uA4.f 19°(G VZ`Q`„\yg10 N Fa•,;(cam o - r e (Signature of ner/Re esentative) �` ` �� s c) -I- w- �" (Signature of Notary Public) 9cP12ts�' ,-tt LIG .;'z;e I s'vj-,, 6-11-96 ‘,•`��v .alp .:::. .:. .:.... ...::::*. . ... . ..... ... .. .... ..::.:....:..�,::. ......�.:...Thls:sectlon::to:�be:com leted�b .;C <. .... . ... • : ':.::>:>::::::: � :.. . . .::. . ...: .:.....t� .. ... .:..:.......(........ . ..... ............:.. .:..:...:.p.... . . .. tt ..Staff.::):: : >::' . : : : ;: : ..Y . .:�.. ... ........ ::<.;. . ::::.Y... .:::::: f?.::::.:... � :. .�...��.�. ....:::<:.:...C.F....:<;<:: RSHPL:.;�.;:GU:: ::LEAP.,E:':::.:F.P:::..TP.....SP.....RVMP.....V............. ...... :.:'.::.:::::<.::;;;;•.:;:.;:.;::.;:.::.:>:.;:.::;:.;;:>.:' ::.�:.. :O A....:...:D.........W................P.... ...:.:...S....M.......'''S....V....E......'::M.....H....F:.�:>.:.,.B:S'P>< A..`...0 PA':'::<::<> >:::{::><: » « :.»i§ " i><`!iii:<:>>::<<:>:': >:::<::.<:.> t O A .FEES.....S......... .:.. : •:• :. :. :.... . :: .: .................................. .... :. ..,....,,,...:.:::::::.. ........:.......Q..AL:PO.STA.GE..PRO.VID.ED...::..$::::::.:�::.:::::::.�:::...:: . : ::::..:.::. REVISED 2/95 k I ::.:.:.;::.::.»:>:.:>:t.>:.:>:!.>::.:::.::::.:;.::-::.:>:.»:<.i•.i:.i:::.:.::.::.i:;.••:.:.;:;•i::<;.:.:!.:.:>:•:.:::.;::.::!.:�:.::.::::.:�>:!.>:.»>:!.:i:.:.:.::!•:;•;;•i:•i::.:.:;.::.:ii::;;•:,:.:>:;!•:::.::!<•:>;•::•:;•:•:;.:r:.::.i::i:;:!•;;•:;::••-i::;•::Y:;:;:>::::>:;.:;:<.::.:.::.;::<.::.:::>:-':.::.::.:::.::;.::.i:✓::•f::::::::::Li;•%:;..: :...:.:...:......:. .:::�::: ...:.......................................:..::::..............:.::...:.:.:.:::::..:.:...:::.:.::. :: ' is � :isis4:;r.:4vi:irii:::(ii.'•i:i::!:'i:i::i::i::i'i:::::::::!•:.:r:L:Lv;,fe.�::!?::::::•.�::::::::.: - :::: >:::>::::>:<:::>::>::»>�:»:<;:�::»:<:»::»::>:<:>•:>::::>:::::<:>::r:::;<:;:>;::<::>:<:::::;:>;:: <::<:::»<::::_::>::»>: V [ � ' E T:::S RVC •>E :::DlV1.S QN::;:;:::>::::<>:<>;::::;;::;>::::>::>;:<<:>:<:»:>:»:>:.::>::>:::�: ... �:'.::•::::::::.::::::::::::::.:.�:::r'vi}:::::::::::::{::L::xLi{r:Li;:^•:::: ...........:•ii:iv:!pi:<+.-i::.................... :�::i:•:!•i:!!4i:•i:LL{{.:::-{f... .................................n...................... .....:.................................................... •v:::::.�::::.�niii;:i,:•ih'4y:�:4ii$i:::!:'r}i::ii::i:{:CY:i}iyii}iv.'.•/. .......:....::'.:::..y'..::.:.}}.::::4::-:::::.:: :::::::.:..••::•:.....::.:...:..:.......................................................................................................................................................................................:................:..�:••:!yi:•'r'.iiii/!.r.:•:iii?;}iiY.ii::-:::iiii:: •isL:i4:A:'?.•v.4ii}nr:•i:^:•i..:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::!:::{:v:L!:::.:�:::::!:qi'::-;^ii:.;:..:.ii;••:::::::.::::!:.:.:::{.iSi:4i::::::::::::::::r::::..........::::::::•:::::::::;....:::::::.....::::..:: ......................... m....... ..........;.i?-`:'v:::::::::::::.v...r'fi::�C:!:Y+•t44^:L!!•i:•i•}.i:Cii:�.::-:� ;:{;:l lri'.?:S:::::'%::�:::i?.;..:_:!•fir: :•ii'fiiii:•ii?iiiiii:v:•ii:. • .•OJECTINF RMATI N Note;> tftheres.':'more:tFan:,._nB`Ie'at:b...:ne��.: ....s..:attaChar►:eddtiorial •. 8 P Wotan;ed.Masi®.Application.foc:eah owner ..... ..... ... . EXISTING LAND USE(S): NAME: POWELL ORILLIA ASC., INC. SITE IS CURRENTLY VACANT ADDRESS: 737 MARKET STREET PROPOSED LAND USES: DISTRIBUTION FACILITY FOR FARWEST STEEL CO., INC. CITY: KIRKLAND, WA ZIP: 98033 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 828-4334 IM ZONING • PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: IM USES NAME: HORTON DENNIS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. EXISTING ZONING: ' CONTACT: MR. BARTON TREECE ADDRESS: IM • 320 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH PROPOSED ZONING: CITY: KIRKLAND, WA ZIP: 98033 IM SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 822-2525 84,071 SF (1.93 AC) OJ P R ECT VALUE: $5,000,000.00 PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: FARWEST STEEL FACILITY, IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: No SW 34TH ST RENTON BETWEEN E. VALLEY RD. AND LIND AVE. IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AR6�t't CF VED KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): � 125380-0211 No FEB2 7 1996 • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON . ::::> A ach::° � es�eet:),f;> ecessa ... .. .. :.. ':>::<;:;>:::<:::»>::>::;.;::•::;:«:<:'::L EGA EI�ES •�RI ;O.IV:::: F>PROPERT°Y.. . tt s� PARCEL A RENTON SHORT PLAT NUMBER-378-79 • KING COUNTY AUDITOR REC. NO. 7909249001 1 : :: ;:Y '. :: F;: PPLI A 0: >: T PE . A i >wil<. .. rmina::fees>: <<:>:<:;> <'<>:><�<:>_: .>;<>>>. ::: .:<:::>;>:<:<:::::::<::>::>:><>>:::>:<::<:::>;:: �y k•a Il::a I( ( �::> es::<tHat<:. . .1.. , C t ..?sta.ff...... ..l..d..�te . .. ..... . ..,...................... ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ REZONE $ .....L LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE_PERMIT $ . PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: 1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ 4,-. (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY I�, ' WAIVER $ ! FINAL ,a __WETLAND PERMIT $ _ ROUTINE VEGETATION M MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ '•' _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ 1 �; • SHORELINE REVIEWS: ,•`i�'. _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ •,;: _ CONDITIONAL USE $ ; VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $No Charge ' ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ p !.;a :. :; WNER . >.gin »<:>: :<>`:i's,. }::€<::<€<`:::: :>: ::::<: : :::::: ><:::<€:><:.:::. »: .FO . SHIP I, (Print Name) ,.declare that I am(please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,jhe authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof Of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I � A -/ / `.r • I ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me,a Notary Public,in and reiI r1 N f,,�Q�« ' for the State of WA u.& residing at C3o'r'�{ y §A�®aneeee (Na of Owner/Representative) 5klat osniiscv( Coa.vl-:J,on the 134►dav \ G. M/C�®,P� I t ®V 4 k\OTARy .�; 0�, Signature of Owner/Repres tative) j-7-7/44./,.,./�J' s-&°o m=N w r. (Signature of Notary Public) exPtg.,,9) -ttpuet+� �s_ ... .. .. .. ... ................................................. ............. ..... .. ... .. .....:.:..:• .:'..:.?i: :.''::i::::::::>: ? i:• ti:i:'t:i:L:i':'::ii: 'r'v}:.}:':.i:':.i, :i4i:Y..n.. .. .: ... . .... .......... ... . ..: ...:. . .... . : .. ... ... ...This:sectlon:.to:.be..com letd . e .b >:Ctt . ff...Sta ........ . ...........................v. .:.......... ::... .....:.::..._ e.:...::.:.::::....::.::.:::: ::::::.:.:.: .:.::tE F::; :.SA ::.R.:.::.SHPL.::::.CU:::._.LLA.:::::PE*.::::F.P:.:..:TP., SP::.::RVMeCt: i .>:.;:g:.:;.:>:;._. ><:<::W::>:<:FPUD:: . M;i:°:SME:::MHP> :»;B.S.P<<s i4<'<CPA`>' >><>`'{ <> >< '<;:>: `: >: ::`<::: >:>:'>::: <;>;<= EI:.' • >; » `::::::::»>'> ' » _> >;;; :::: :i:>;:�:T.QTAL�'FEE ..<.>:..S ..:;::;:.;:::;;;:.:'.;;:;. :;.;:.;;;:.;:.;::..:<.;::::<.;:..:.::;;f. TAL:::POSTA.G .. .. .....$...::>:.:;;;:.:. .:. .::... :.:::.::::.: i:;:::.;:.:>::»:;;::.:.;.. REVISED 2.95..'... 02/09/96 FRI 16:24 FAX 503 683 9200 F19S/ADMIN.—PRES. Z 001 - I I I 1 FAR ST STEEL Corporation 1 DAVE FORESTER Vice PreDIdent of Finonce I 1 1 #1t)r C'// PrZ.' *' I 11 teleini/404:D i - b/ I .je 217444 C� 1 1 6 ./: ! . 9--4,04-4.1- 4-61-1 1 pi natteyr,-._ /c-ai.•e.A- t . 4.414„4":::0041 1 1 /a e r°141.4%i . rgle.... t 5 --i-%f , 1 ca. er..4.4 onekz.0.--J '0(7 rja-7i 1 7:44.vewioh 1 0.~ii) I 1 1 1 r j )---00-9*-' 1 1 DEVE!a,�,hpL'N't"('tAfVNING 1 C1iYOFRE'NTON I I 1 2000 Henderson Avenue • Post Office Box B89 • Eugene, Oregon 97440 • 503/686-2000 I I . ' Aged O111 5-yeatfic , 1 I mit,whyx 1 , 'ill , ,ot ao rp Horton Dennis &Associates, Inc. H DA Consulting Engineers,Planners & Surveyors CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION FARWEST STEEL RENTON,WASHINGTON 1. Proposed construction dates - Construction is anticipated to begin with the installation of temporary erosion control and placement of building preload on or about April 1, 1996. Construction is anticipated to be complete on April 1, 1997. 2. Hours of Operation - Hours of operation are anticipated to be 7:00 am through 7:00 pm. As the general contractor has not been part of the application to this point, these hours may be modified slightly, with staff approvals. 3. Proposed Hauling/Transportation Routes -It is anticipated that the majority of materials will arrive on site via I-405, Valley Freeway, SW 41st Street Interchange, and East Valley Highway. Likewise, the exiting maneuvers from the site would be East Valley Highway to the SW 43rd Street entrance onto East Valley Freeway and thence to I-405. 4. Measures to be Implemented to Minimize Construction Impacts - If needed, the site will be sprinidered to minimize dust, the traffic and transportation impacts will be minimized as most material deliveries and materials exiting the site are anticipated to in off-peak traffic hours,there will be rock construction entrances and, if necessary, truck wheel wash facilities and noise will be minimized to the extent possible - obviously most construction is during normal business hours. EC 6VED FEB 2 7 ii9s DEVELOpMEN1 PLANNING CITY OF RENTON I _ 9556.mit 320 Second Avenue South, Kirkland, Washington 98033, Phone (206) 822-2525, Fax (206) 822-8758 Kirkland • Wenatchee • Burien Horton Dennis &Associates, Inc. HDA Consulting Engineers, Planners & Surveyors FARWEST STEEL PROJECT NARRATIVE • Size and Location of Site The site size is 245,470 square feet (5.63 acres) located in Renton on the south side of SW 34th Street, mid way between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue. The legal description is as follows: PARCEL 1: Parcel A of City of Renton Short Plat No. 378-79 recorded under King County recording No. 7909249001 and 7909240948; situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. 1 PARCEL 2: Lot B of Burlington Northern, a binding site plan, according to the City of Renton Binding Site Plan recorded under King County recording No. 9206302696, in Volume 161 of Plats, Pages 8 through 11,Record of King County; situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. And an easement for ingress and egress over the following described property: The north 60.00 feet of the west 289 feet of Lot 7 of Burlington Northern, a binding site plan, according to the City of Renton Binding Site Plan recorded under King County recording No. 9206302696, in Volume 161 of Plats, pages 8 through 11, Records of King County; situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. (Note: The final description will be included in the easement document upon final location approvals from City staff.) During future permitting processes, Parcels 1 and 2 will be combined and the associated easement relocated along the proposed water main once this facility's location is approved by City staff during final design. • The existing site is very flat with little vegetation and no existing improvements except rail spurs and frontage improvements on SW 34th Street. 2 fEB • There are no wetlands, steep slopes or other sensitive features. ovEL o �T� ��G l of 2 320 Second Avenue South, Kirkland, Washington 98033, Phone (206) 822-2525, Fax (206) 822-8758 Kirkland • Wenatchee • Burien • • The proposed use of the property is to house a steel distribution center. Plate, beam, channel and other structural steel in bulk quantities will be delivered by Burlington Northern Railroad (approximately 30% to 40%) and by truck. The facility will store these materials for the purpose of selling to manufacturers, fabricator, contractors, etc. Some steel will be cut to customer's orders by saw, slicer, or burning machine. Generally, the bulk product arrives by rail or truck, is unloaded inside the facility by gantry crane or forklift, assembled into customers orders, loaded onto trucks and delivered to customers concentrated in Washington. • The Phase I warehouse will be 63,300 square feet, with a maximum height ranging from 39 to 45 feet. The Phase II warehouse will add an additional 32,250 square feet. The Phase II building area will be paved during Phase I construction and utilized for material storage until demand dictates construction of the Phase II building. Phase I will include the installation of a 2,700 square foot office and a 660 square foot superintendents office/crew facility. Warehouse exterior material will consist of 12-foot-high tilt-up concrete walls with preformed metal panels above. All in a neutral color. The two office facilities may be modular buildings, also of a neutral color. the lot will be paved except for landscaped areas. Access will be from 34th Street and Lind Avenue. The proposal calls for 50 parking spaces. Based on other operations, this will allow at least five extra parking spaces. • The warehouse will be open Sunday 11:00 p.m. through Friday 11:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday will be available on an as needed basis. Office hours will be 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. The initial project will employ approximately 16 warehouse staff and 12 other staff consisting of outside salespersons, truck drivers and administrative personnel. There will be three shifts - day (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.), swing (4:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m.), and graveyard (12:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m.) with 16, 4 and 3 employees, respectively. An additional 5 drivers report for work at 4:00 a.m., 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. • Deliveries outside the local area will leave the plant early in the morning prior to a.m. peak and would use I-5, 405 or 167. Local trucks will also leave early in the morning using the same main routes for deliveries outside the Renton/Kent area. Local trucks would return for a second run during the day. Analysis of current trip generations from Farwest Steel facilities indicate a total of 58 ADT, 16 of which are delivery vehicles and 42 employee generated. ITE lists only two studies for similar facilities (truck terminals) therefore, historical data is presumed to be more accurate. • Farwest Steel's business does not generate any undue amount of dust, mud, noxious fumes or the like. Noise caused by forklifts, cranes and saws has not been considered a nuisance at other Farwest Steel facilities. Most of Farwest Steel's trucks will be leaving before peak morning traffic and returning before or after peak evening traffic. 2of2 Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. • • • }r,:. ::::GtTX`.. F:., .:(3EN..T .N VELOP•`<.ENTSE•;`;v}}:. ..}:.:S::: • ENVIRONMENTAL 1.1% • • - - C. PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this.checklist is to provide information to help you and the *agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. • INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to.describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of. your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately arid carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or If a question does not apply to your proposal, write"do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area,"respectively. . G!IN( 1 A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 1. Name of project, if applicable: Farwest Steel Co. Facility 2. Name of Applicant: Mr. David Forester Farwest Steel Company 2000 Henderson Avenue Eugene, OR 97440 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Horton Dennis & Assoc., Inc. 320 Second Avenue South Kirkland, WA 98033 • Contact: Mr. Barton Treece (206)822-2525 4. Date checklist prepared: February 1, 1996 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction will be an initial phase commcencing April, 1996 with completion scheduled for June, 1997. A future phase, depending on need, will follow. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or • connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. A possible future second phase may add 32,250 s.f. to the building. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Soils report, wetlands assessment 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. We are not aware of any other pending applications or proposals on this site. 10: List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site plan approval - City of Renton Grading, construction and building permits - City of Renton 2 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposal is to construct a 95,550 s.f. office/warehouse facility in (2) phases and an associated 3,360 s.f. office space on a 245,470 s.f. (5.63 acre) site with 45 parking stalls, a rail spur line, asphalt loading and manuevering areas with associated site civil and landscape improvements. Please refer to attached project narrative for additional information. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range of boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related tot his checklist. The general location of the project is the southern portion of Renton in the Green River Valley. Burlington Northern binding site plan lot B as per lot line adjustment auditors number 9511-2990-06 King County, and parcel "A", Renton short plat number 378-79, auditor's no. 7909249001. 3 B. ENVIRONMENTAL. ELEMENTS • 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): 4,11, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Maximum 1%.. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Refer to soils report by Terra Associates, Inc. included as an attachment to this checklist. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 20,000 cubic yards of fill and pre-load material will be imported to the site from local borrow pits. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, soil erosion could occur in connection with the proposed development since the entire site would be stripped of vegetation. Even though the site is flat, erosion could occur during rain and/or wind storms that occur during the construction phase of the project. To minimize this potential for soil erosion, site preparation techniques would include temporary detention ponds and filter fences to reduce the impact of water runoff on the surface soil. Landscaping will be placed on all surfaces not covered with impervious materials. No significant erosion is expected following project completion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 76%coverage. Total Site Area: 245,470 s.f.; Building Area: 98,910 s.f.; Paving Area: 86,670 s.f. 4 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. Earthwork activities should be done during periods of dryer weather. Erosion and sedimentation controls such as interceptor swales, straw bale barriers, silt fences and straw mulch for temporary erosion protection of exposed soils should be applied during construction. Stabilized construction entrances and washpads should be installed at the beginning of construction and maintained for the duration of the project. All erosion and sedimentation control measures shall be installed and maintained in accordance with City of Renton requirements. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Development of the site, as proposed, would not result in any significant impacts to existing air quality. The primary impacts from development of the proposed project are related to construction activities and future vehicle traffic. Dust generated from grading and construction vehicle activity would be a temporary nuisance in the general area. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. Transport of materials on local streets should be controlled to minimize congestion during peak travel times. This would minimize secondary air quality impacts caused by reduced travel speeds. Dust produced by construction can be reduced by using a number of techniques. Areas of exposed soils such as storage yards could be sprayed with water, oils, or chemical dust suppressants. Areas that might be exposed for prolonged periods of time should be covered with suitable groundcover to prevent wind erosion. Soils carried out of the construction area by trucks could be minimized by: use of a sawdust mat as a transition zone from the construction site; wheel washing; washing or brushing truck undercarriages; and covering dusty truck loads. For soils that do escape the construction site on trucks, a daily street cleaning program for truck routes would help to minimize dust. (. 5 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, salt water, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Wetlands have been identified on the adjacent Home Base site ref. application no. LUA-95-204, SA, ECF. None are present on this site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. The proposed project will not require the withdrawal of surface water from existing wetlands. However, surface water drainage will be conveyed to the storm drain system in Lind Avenue SW west of the project site. Surface water runoff will be directed to an onsite water quality and detention facility. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. According to the City of Renton Community Profile, 1989, the site of the proposed project is not within either the 100-year floodplain or floodway. The FEMA flood plain maps for the City of Renton depict the project site as being outside of the 100-year floodplain as well. 6 6) Does the pr ._:;al involve any discharges of wdsie materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, all waste material from the site would enter the City's storm drain or sanitary sewer collection system. Based on the preliminary grading and utility plans for the project, all surface water runoff would be collected from paved areas and roof tops by storm drains and directed to an onsite water quality facility. b. Groundwater: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No, none. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Future construction of buildings and site improvements would cover up to 76% of the site with impervious surfaces. This would result in storm water runoff that would drain to the Springbrook Creek, which flows back into the Black River.. - 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Surface water could be contaminated by runoff containing oil and gas from parked cars on the parking lot and streets servicing the proposal. However, surface water runoff will be directed into an on site water quality facility. No storage of hazardous materials on site is proposed. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: On site storm drainage and water quality/detention capabilities. 7 4. Plants a. Check or circle ve types of ation found on the site: P 9 deciduous tree: alder' maple aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs Xgrass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All of the shrubs, grasses, and weeds on-site would be removed during the grading phase of construction. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: All new landscaping and irrigation systems would be installed per the requirements of the City of Renton's landscaping ordinance. See preliminary landscaping plan submitted along with this checklist. C 8 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site (see next page): Birds: hawk, heron, eagl songbirds th Mammals: deer, bear, elk, , of a Roden Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfis , o er: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None proposed. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric lighting, power, HVAC, gas heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: For the Farwest Steel facility, energy conservation would consist of an insulated office area envelope, HVAC with heat recovery features, automatic energy management systems, energy efficient light fixtures. The State of Washington has adopted model conservation standards for new commercial buildings, and as the City of Renton has adopted these standards, this building would be consistent with these model standards. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? if so, describe. None to our knowledge. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire, police and ambulance services would be required on a basis consistent with similar facilities. No special services are required. 9 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None required. b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? Traffic from SR 167 and local arterials can be heard from the site but would not affect proposal. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term: construction related (9 month duration) 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Long term: normal commercial traffic associated with a distribution facility. Facility will operate three shifts - 24 hours. Refer to project narrative for additional information. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None proposed. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is vacant; adjacent site has a Home Base warehouse store, surrounding sites are commerical uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? IM. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? IM uses. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable: lu • h. Has any part of 1. .lite been classified as an "environl tally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 36 employees would work in the completed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None required. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. The proposed project is a steel and concrete structure, that is similar in size, design and scale of the other industrial, warehouse, and commercial buildings in the vicinity of the site. The type of use proposed is also consistent with land uses adjacent to the site and in the surrounding area. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None required. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Maximum building height would be 45'-0" Principal exterior materials will be prefinished sheet metal siding and concrete. 11 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Appearance of the site would change from a vacant and undeveloped area to an urban use. Views from adjacent commercial and industrial uses toward the site would change from vacant fields to views of commercial uses with parking lots. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. A landscaping strip along the public right-of-way, interior parking lot landscaping, and perimeter landscaping consisting of a variety of trees, shrubs, and groundcover are proposed. Also see the project narrative prepared by the project architect and included as an attachment to this checklist. An enhanced entrance facing the parking lot and a varied building painting scheme will serve to provide some aesthetic interest for the proposed project. See the project narrative prepared by EKA Architects and HDA for additional information. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposals produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Exterior lighting resulting from the proposed building would consist of wall lighting, parking lot lighting, with non-glare fixtures, and some signage. Any glare that may occur would happen at night. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No safety hazards from lighting would occur. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. All outdoor lighting would be shielded and directed downward or upward so as to minimize potential instrusion on neighboring properties. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? An Act Ill Theater Complex occupies an adjacent site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. None required. 12 a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state or local preservation registers known to be on or next to, the site? If so, generally describe. None. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. None are proposed. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed project is located on a vacant site that fronts S.W. 34th Street between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue S.W. The East Valley Freeway (SR 167) parallels East Valley Road and is to the east. The closest freeway interchange is located at SW 41 st Street where freeway southbound on- and off- ramps are available. Northbound on- and off-ramps for SR 167 are located at SW 43rd Street. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is not currently serviced by public transit. Route 155, which provides service to and from the Southcenter shopping mall, is the closet public transit line to the project site. The closet bus stop to the site is several blocks to the south at SW 43rd and East Valley Road. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 45 stalls - None eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). A connection from the project's SW corner to Lind Avenue will be constructed and maintained as a private drive. 13 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes, existing rail service will be utilized on site by means of a new spur track system. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 58 trips during maximum for any 24 hour period. Peak daily volumes: 6:00-7:00 a.m. and 3:00-4:00 p.m. Based upon historic operational data from existing facilities. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. Impact Fees. The City of Renton has recently adopted an Impact Fee Program. As mitigation for a project's impact to the area transportation system, the City of Renton requires an impact fee to help fund future capacity improvements within the City. The impact fee is $75 per net new average weekday daily trip (AWDT). This projects's contribution would be$4,350.00. Local Off-Site Improvements. Other than installation of a sidewalk on the project's 34th Street frontage, no local off-site improvements are recommended. Since the project does not degrade the level of service at any study area intersection for 1996 conditions with the proposed project no specific roadway ' improvements are required. 14 15.Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes. The new development would require police and fire department service. The building proposed on-site would be fully sprinklered, thus reducing the potential demand on fire department services. Future calls for fire service and emergency medical service would be expected. The impact on schools and health services would be minimal since most new employees are expected to be hired from the local labor pool. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None proposed. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utilities providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Sewer: City of Renton Telephone: GTE NW Water: City of Renton Power: Puget Sound Power and Light C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Agri Proponent: I',,i Name Printed: *44 , lit«- Date: Z.13 .94 15 DO NOT USE THIS SHEET FOR PROJECT ACTIONS. D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emission to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life? 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 16 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE • I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Date: ch:c:envcklst.frm 10/90 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 02'/27/96 15 : 12 . Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9600842 Amount : 1, 503 . 52 02/27/96 15 : 11 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: FARWEST, 99460 Init : JB Project # : LUA96-022 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Location: SW 34TH ST BETWEEN E VALLEY AND LIND AV • Total Fee's : 1, 503 . 52 This Payment 1, 503 . 52 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 503 . 52 Balance: . 00 ********-******************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site. Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 3 . 52 1 1 • • I - HDA File No. 9556.00 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR FARWEST STEEL CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON Prepared By: Bryant O. Mercil, P.E. ; lJ •ov s 0f%, 4:4 , HORTON DENNIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. � z 320 Second Avenue South �°� �� ' ' ' w • O `.b. 27991 Kirkland, Washington 98033-6687 0�! �'ts•rER� ti ' Phone: (206) 822-2525 $ 1%•ANAL ECG' Fax: (206) 822-8758 .4 '' ' 2/ 14J'% I EXPIRES G'27, le February 13, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction: 1 Summary of Results: 3 Storm Routings Pre Developed Conditions: 5 Post Developed Conditions: 6 Runoff Curve Number and Time of Concentration: 9 Detention Basin Design Data: 11 Drainage Area Map: 14 INTRODUCTION The following computations present the preliminary design of a storm water detention system for the proposed FarWest Steel warehouse. The proposed 5.63 acre development is located on the south side of SW 34th Street, east of Lind Avenue in the City of Renton and will be developed in the following two phases: • Phase One will involve construction of a 63,300 square foot warehouse, 660 square foot temporary office and a 2,700 square foot permanent office. • Phase Two will involve construction of a 32,200 square foot warehouse. EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS The project site is presently a vacant parcel comprised of two recorded parcels (Parcel A of SP 378- 79 and Lot B of the Burlington Northern Railroad Binding Site Plan No. 014 - 92). The parcel was filled approximately 18 years ago. The existing ground cover consists mainly of grasses in poor condition over the fill material. The site generally drains from east to west at an average slope of 0.25 percent. PROPOSED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS Runoff from the parking, driveway and loading areas on the project site will be conveyed in a storm drain pipe system to two water quality basins adjacent to the south property line. The basins have been designed with a flat bottom slope to promote water quality through the ponding of storm water runoff. The lower basin outfalls into a pipe system, which in turn discharges into an excavated detention facility located in the southwest corner of the project site. A 2.5 foot deep excavated settlement area has been provided in front of the detention system control structure located in the southeast corner of the facility. The control structure has been designed to provide controlled release of excess storm water runoff from the project site. Control in the detention system will be provided by the following set inside a 54 inch diameter catch basin manhole: • An 3.25 inch diameter orifice set at elevation 12.00. • An 4 inch diameter elbow set at elevation 13.75. • An 12 inch diameter restrictor with an overflow elevation of 15.25. 1 The control structure will discharge to a 12-inch storm drain pipe. The storm drain pipe will extend approximately 330 feet west to a connection at an existing catch basin constructed as part of the storm drain outfall system for the HomeBase Warehouse development. An existing 12-inch storm drain pipe continues approximately 90 feet west to an existing 60 inch storm drain pipe on the west side of Lind Avenue. The storm drain pipe continues approximately 600 feet north, then 1,000 feet east to an outfall in Springbrook Creek. The proposed detention basin has been designed to maximize the volume available for storage of excess storm water runoff. Due to the disturbed condition of the vacant parcel, a pre developed land use condition of meadow was assumed consistant with previous studies in the general area. As seen in the summary of results, the proposed facility provides a significant reduction in peak discharges from 'development of the project site. 2 SUMMARY OF RESULTS PROPOSED DETENTION SYSTEM Total Area of Project Site- 5.63 Acres Less Bypass Area: 0.35 Acres Total Site Area Tributary to Detention Basin: 5.28 Acres 2 YEAR STORM Peak Discharge, Pre Develped Conditions: 0.93 cfs Peak Inflow to Basin: 2.22 cfs Proposed Release Rate: 0.41 cfs Design Water Surface Elevation: 13.68 Approximate Volume of Storage Provided: 11,100 cf 10 YEAR STORM Peak Discharge, Pre Develped Conditions: 1.76 cfs Peak Inflow to Basin: 3.36 cfs Proposed Release Rate: 0.76 cfs Design Water Surface Elevation: 14.31 Volume of Storage Provided: 16,230 cf 100 YEAR STORM Peak Discharge, Pre Develped Conditions: 2.75 cfs Peak Inflow to Basin: 4.61 cfs Proposed Release Rate: 0.99 cfs Design Water Surface Elevation: 15.04 Volume of Storage Provided: 23,500 cf 3 STORM ROUTINGS 4 ******************80-80 LIST OF INPUT DATA FOR TR-20 HYDROLOGY****************** JOB TR-20 NOPLOTS TITLE FARWEST STEEL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STUDY TITLE PRE DEVELOPED CONDITIONS 2, 10 AND 100 YEAR STORMS (9566E1.DAT) 6 RUNOFF 1 01 1 0.00825 89.00 0.75 0 1 0 0 0 0 ENDATA 7 INCREM 6 0.10 7 COMPUT 7 01 01 0.0 2.00 1.0 3 2 1 1 ENDCMP 1 7 COMPUT 7 01 01 0.0 2.90 1.0 3 2 1 2 ENDCMP 1 7 COMPUT 7 01 01 0.0 3.90 1.0 3 2 1 3 ENDCMP 1 ENDJOB 2 *******************************END OF 80-80 LIST******************************** EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION INCREM MAIN TIME INCREMENT = 0.10 HOURS RECORD ID EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT FROM STRUCTURE 1 TO STRUCTURE 1 RECORD ID STARTING TIME = 0.00 RAIN DEPTH = 2.00 RAIN DURATION = 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO. = 3 ANT. MOIST. COND = 2 ALTERNATE NO. = 1 STORM NO. = 1 MAIN TIME INCREMENT = 0.10 HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE 1 2 YEAR STORM TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = 0.00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = 0.10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA =0.00825 SQ.MI. 6.00 DISCHG .07 .08 .09 .10 .11 .12 .13 .14 .15 .17 7.00 DISCHG .18 .20 .21 .23 .25 .27 .30 .35 .43 .55 8.00 DISCHG .68 .81 .90 .93 .91 .87 .82 .77 .73 .69 9.00 DISCHG .65 .61 .58 .55 .52 .50 .47 .45 .44 .42 10.00 DISCHG .41 :40 .39 .39 .38 .37 .36 .36 .35 .34 11.00 DISCHG .34 .33 .33 .33 .32 .32 .32 .32 .31 .31 12.00 DISCHG .31 .31 .31 .30 .30 .30 .30 .29 .29 .29 13.00 DISCHG .29 .29 .28 .28 .28 .28 .28 .28 .28 .28 14.00 DISCHG .28 .27 .27 .27 .27 .27 .27 .27 .27 .27 15.00 DISCHG .27 .26 .26 .26 .26 .26 .26 .26 .26 .26 EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PASS 1 RECORD ID EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT FROM STRUCTURE 1 TO STRUCTURE 1 RECORD ID STARTING TIME = 0.00 RAIN DEPTH = 2.90 RAIN DURATION = 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO. = 3 ANT. MOIST. COND = 2 ALTERNATE NO. = 1 STORM NO. = 2 MAIN TIME INCREMENT = 0.10 HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE 1 10 YEAR STORM TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = 0.00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = 0.10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA =0.00825 SQ.MI. 6.00 DISCHG .23 .25 .26 .28 .29 .31 .33 .35 .37 .40 7.00 DISCHG .43 .45 .48 .51 .55 .58 .63 .73 .89 1.11 8.00 DISCHG 1.35 1.57 1.72 1.76 1.72 1.63 1.52 1.42 1.33 1.24 9.00 DISCHG 1.16 1.10 1.04 .98 .92 .87 .83 .79 .76 .73 10.00 DISCHG .71 .69 .68 .66 .65 .63 .62 .61 .60 .58 11.00 DISCHG .57 .57 .56 .55 .55 .54 .54 .53 .53 .52 12.00 DISCHG .52 .51 .51 .51 .50 .50 .49 .49 .48 .48 13.00 DISCHG .48 .47 .47 .47 .47 .47 .46 .46 .46 .46 14.00 DISCHG .45 .45 .45 .45 .45 .44 .44 .44 .44 .44 15.00 DISCHG .43 .43 .43 .43 .42 .42 .42 .42 .42 .41 EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PASS 2 RECORD ID EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT FROM STRUCTURE 1 TO STRUCTURE 1 RECORD ID STARTING TIME = 0.00 RAIN DEPTH = 3.90 RAIN DURATION = 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO. = 3 ANT. MOIST. COND = 2 ALTERNATE NO. = 1 STORM NO. = 3 MAIN TIME INCREMENT = 0.10 HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE 1 100 YEAR STORM TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = 0.00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = 0.10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA =0.00825 SQ.MI. 6.00 DISCHG .44 .46 .49 .51 .54 .56 .59 .62 .66 .70 7.00 DISCHG .74 .78 .82 .87 .92 .97 1.05 1.19 1.44 1.78 8.00 DISCHG 2.15 2.48 2.70 2.75 2.66 2.51 2.34 2.17 2.02 1.88 9.00 DISCHG 1.76 1.65 1.56 1.47 1.38 1.30 1.23 1.17 1.13 1.09 10.00 DISCHG 1.05 1.02 1.00 .97 .95 .93 .91 .89 .87 .85 11.00 DISCHG .84 .83 .81 .80 .79 .79 .78 .77 .76 .76 12.00 DISCHG .75 .74 .74 .73 .72 .72 .71 .71 .70 .69 13.00 DISCHG .69 .68 .68 .67 .67 .67 .67 .67 .66 .66 14.00 DISCHG .65 .65 .64 .64 .64 .64 .64 .63 .63 .62 15.00 DISCHG .62 .61 .61 .61 .61 .60 .60 .60 .60 .59 EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PASS 3 RECORD ID EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDJOB END OF 1 JOB IN THIS RUN RECORD ID 5 ******************80-80 LIST OF INPUT DATA FOR TR-20 HYDROLOGY****************** JOB TR-20 NOPLOTS TITLE FARWEST STEEL STORM WATER MANAGEMENT STUDY TITLE POST-DEVELOPED CONDITIONS 2, 10 AND 100 YEAR STORMS (9556D1.DAT) 3 STRUCT 01 8 12.00 0.0000 0.0000 8 12.20 0.1282 0.0270 B 12.40 0.1813 0.0549 8 12.60 0.2220 0.0836 8 12.80 0.2564 0.1131 8 13.00 0.2866 0.1435 8 13.20 0.3140 0.1748 8 13.40 0.3392 0.2074 8 13.60 0.3626 0.2411 8 13.80 0.4816 0.2761 8 14.00 0.6225 0.3122 8 14.20 0.7164 0.3503 8 14.40 0.7941 0.3912 8 14.60 0.8625 0.4348 8 14.80 0.9245 0.4812 8 15.00 0.9819 0.5303 8 15.20 1.0356 0.5817 8 15.40 1.6311 0.6350 8 15.60 3.0765 0.6901 8 15.80' 3.9852 0.7470 9 ENDTBL 6 RUNOFF 1 01 1 0.00825 97.00 0.20 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 RESVOR 2 01 1 2 12.00 0 1 1 0 0 0 ENDATA 7 INCREM 6 0.1 7 COMPUT 7 01 01 0.0 2.00 1.0 3 2 1 1 ENDCMP 1 7 COMPUT 7 01 01 0.0 2.90 1.0 3 2 1 2 ENDCMP 1 7 COMPUT 7 01 01 0.0 3.90 1.0 3 2 1 3 ENDCMP 1 ENDJOB 2 0*******************************END OF 80-80 LIST******************************** EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION INCREM MAIN TIME INCREMENT = 0.10 HOURS RECORD ID EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT FROM STRUCTURE 1 TO STRUCTURE 1 RECORD ID STARTING TIME = 0.00 RAIN DEPTH = 2.00 RAIN DURATION = 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO. = 3 ANT. MOIST. COND = 2 ALTERNATE NO. = 1 STORM NO. = 1 MAIN TIME INCREMENT = 0.10 HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE 1 2 YEAR STORM TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = 0.00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = 0.10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = 0.00825 SQ.MI. 6.00 DISCHG .41 .43 .47 .48 .49 .49 .53 .58 .60 .61 7.00 DISCHG .62 .66 .73 .75 .77 .78 1.14 1.81 2.08 2.17 8.00 DISCHG 2.22 1.93 1.37 1.17 1.11 1.09 1.01 .87 .82 .80 9.00 DISCHG .80 .75 .65 .62 .61 .60 .59 .56 .55 .55 10.00 DISCHG .55 .53 .50 .49 .49 .49 .48 .46 .45 .45 11.00 DISCHG .45 .44 .43 .43 .43 .43 .42 .41 .41 .41 12.00 DISCHG .41 .40 .39 .39 .39 .39 .38 .37 .37 .37 13.00 DISCHG .37 .37 .37 .37 .37 .37 .36 .35 .35 .35 14.00 DISCHG .35 .35 .35 .35 .35 .35 .34 .34 .33 .33 15.00 DISCHG .33 .33 .33 .33 .33 .33 .33 .32 .31 .31 OPERATION RESVOR STRUCTURE 1 TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = 0.00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = 0.10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = 0.00825 SQ.MI. 6.00 DISCHG .17 .17 .17 .18 .18 .19 .19 .20 .20 .20 6.00 ELEV 12.34 12.36 12.38 12.39 12.41 12.43 12.45 12.47 12.49 12.51 7.00 DISCHG .21 .21 .22 .23 .23 .24 .24 .25 .27 .26 7.00 ELEV 12.54 12.56 12.59 12.62 12.65 12.68 12.72 12.79 12.88 12.98 8.00 DISCHG .30 .31 .32 .33 .33 .34 .34 .34 .35 .35 8.00 ELEV 13.08 13.17 13.24 13.29 13.33 13.37 13.41 13.44 13.46 13.48 9.00 DISCHG .35 .35 .36 .36 .36 .36 .36 .36 .37 .37 9.00 ELEV 13.51 13.53 13.54 13.56 13.57 13.58 13.59 13.60 13.61 13.62 10.00 DISCHG .38 .38 .39 .39 .39 .40 .40 .40 .40 .40 10.00 ELEV 13.63 13.64 13.64 13.65 13.65 13.66 13.66 13.66 13.67 13.67 11.00 DISCHG .40 .41 .41 .41 .41 .41 .41 .41 .41 .41 11.00 ELEV 13.67 13.67 13.67 13.67 13.68 13.68 13.68 13.68 13.68 13.68 12.00 DISCHG .41 .41 .41 .41 .41 .41 .41 .41 .41 .40 12.00 ELEV 13.68 13.68 13.68 13.68 13.68 13.68 13.67 13.67 13.67 13.67 13.00 DISCHG .40 .40 .40 .40 .40 .40 .40 .40 .40 .39 13.00 ELEV 13.67 13.67 13.66 13.66 13.66 13.66 13.66 13.66 13.66 13.65 14.00 DISCHG .39 .39 .39 .39 .39 .39 .39 .39 .38 .38 14.00 ELEV 13.65 13.65 13.65 13.65 13.64 13.64 13.64 13.64 13.64 13.63 15.00 DISCHG .38 .38 .38 .38 .38 .37 .37 .37 .37 .37 15.00 ' ELEV 13.63 13.63 13.63 13.62 13.62 13.62 13.62 13.61 13.61 13.61 EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PASS 1 RECORD ID 6 EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT FROM STRUCTURE 1 TO STRUCTURE 1 RECORD ID STARTING TIME = 0.00 RAIN DEPTH = 2.90 RAIN DURATION = 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO. = 3 ANT. MOIST. COND = 2 ALTERNATE NO. = 1 STORM NO. = 2 MAIN TIME INCREMENT = 0.10 HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE 1 10 YEAR STORM TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = 0.00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = 0.10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = 0.00825 SQ.MI. 5.00 DISCHG .51 .53 .56 .57 .58 .59 .61 .63 .65 .66 6.00 DISCHG .66 .69 .75 .77 .78 .79 .84 .92 .95 .97 7.00 DISCHG .97 1.03 1.13 1.17 1.19 1.20 1.75 2.78 3.17 3.31 8.00 DISCHG 3.36 2.91 2.07 1.76 1.67 1.64 1.52 1.30 1.22 1.20 9.00 DISCHG 1.20 1.12 .97 .92 .90 .90 .88 .83 .82 .81 10.00 DISCHG .81 .79 .74 .73 .72 .72 .71 .68 .67 .66 11.00 DISCHG .66 .66 .64 .64 .63 .63 .63 .61 .61 .60 12.00 DISCHG .60 .60 .58 .58 .58 .57 .57 .55 .55 .55 13.00 DISCHG .55 .55 .55 .55 .55 .55 .54 .52 .52 .52 14.00 DISCHG .52 .52 .52 .52 .52 .52 .51 .49 .49 .49 15.00 DISCHG .49 .49 .49 .49 .49 .49 .48 .46 .46 .46 OPERATION RESVOR STRUCTURE 1 TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = 0.00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = 0.10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = 0.00825 SQ.MI. 5.00 DISCHG .19 .19 .20 .20 .20 .21 .21 .22 .22 .23 5.00 ELEV 12.43 12.45 12.47 12.49 12.51 12.54 12.56 12.58 12.61 12.63 6.00 DISCHG .23 .24 .24 .25 .25 .26 .26 .27 .27 .28 6.00 ELEV 12.65 12.68 12.71 12.74 12.76 12.79 12.82 12.86 12.89 12.93 7.00 DISCHG .28 .29 .29 .30 .31 .31 .32 .33 .35 .37 • 7.00 ELEV 12.97 13.01 13.05 13.10 13.14 13.19 13.25 13.35 13.48 13.62 8.00 DISCHG .45 .54 .60 .63 .66 .68 .69 .71 .72 .73 8.00 ELEV 13.76 13.88 13.97 14.02 14.07 14.11 14.15 14.18 14.21 14.23 9.00 DISCHG .73 .74 .74 .75 .75 .75 .76 .76 .76 .76 9.00 ELEV 14.24 14.26 14.27 14.28 14.29 14.29 14.30 14.30 14.31 14.31 10.00 DISCHG .76 .76 .76 .76 .76 .76 .76 .76 .76 .75 10.00 ELEV 14.31 14.31 14.31 14.31 14.31 14.31 14.31 14.30 14.30 14.30 11.00 DISCHG .75 .75 .75 .75 .75 .74 .74 .74 .74 .74 11.00 ELEV 14.29 14.29 14.29 14.28 14.28 14.27 14.27 14.26 14.26 14.25 12.00 DISCHG .73 .73 .73 .73 .73 .72 .72 .72 .72 .71 12.00 ELEV 14.25 14.24 14.24 14.23 14.22 14.22 14.21 14.20 14.20 14.19 13.00 DISCHG .71 .71 .70 .70 .70 .69 .69 .69 .68 .68 13.00 ELEV 14.18 14.18 14.17 14.16 14.16 14.15 14.14 14.14 14.13 14.12 14.00 DISCHG .68 .67 .67 .67 .66 .66 .66 .65 .65 .65 14.00 ELEV 14.12 14.11 14.10 14.09 14.09 14.08 14.08 14.07 14.06 14.05 15.00 DISCHG .64 .64 .64 .64 .63 .63 .63 .62 .62 .61 15.00 ELEV 14.05 14.04 14.03 14.03 14.02 14.02 14.01 14.00 13.99 13.99 EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PASS 2 RECORD ID 7 EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION COMPUT FROM STRUCTURE 1 TO STRUCTURE 1 RECORD ID STARTING TIME = 0.00 RAIN DEPTH = 3.90 RAIN DURATION = 1.00 RAIN TABLE NO. = 3 ANT. MOIST. COND = 2 ALTERNATE NO. = 1 STORM NO. = 3 MAIN TIME INCREMENT = 0.10 HOURS OPERATION RUNOFF STRUCTURE 1 100 YEAR STORM TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = 0.00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = 0.10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = 0.00825 SQ.MI. 5.00 DISCHG .75 .77 .81 .83 .84 .85 .87 .91 .93 .93 6.00 DISCHG .94 .98 1.06 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.18 1.29 1.34 1.35 7.00 DISCHG 1.36 1.44 1.58 1.63 1.65 1.66 2.43 3.84 4.38 4.55 8.00 DISCHG 4.61 3.99 2.83 2.40 2.28 2.24 2.07 1.78 1.67 1.64 9.00 DISCHG 1.63 1.52 1.32 1.25 1.23 1.23 1.19 1.13 1.11 1.10 10.00 DISCHG 1.10 1.07 1.01 .99 .98 .98 .96 .92 .91 .90 11.00 DISCHG .90 .89 .87 .86 .86 .86 .85 .83 .82 .82 12.00 DISCHG .82 .81 .79 .78 .78 .78 .77 .75 .74 .74 13.00 DISCHG .74 .74 .74 .74 .74 .74 .73 .71 .70 .70 14.00 DISCHG .70 .70 .70 .70 .70 .70 .69 .67 .66 .66 15.00 DISCHG .66 .66 .66 .66 .66 .66 .65 .63 .62 .62 OPERATION RESVOR STRUCTURE 1 TIME(HRS) FIRST HYDROGRAPH POINT = 0.00 HOURS TIME INCREMENT = 0.10 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA = 0.00825 SQ.MI. 5.00 DISCHG .24 .25 .25 .26 .26 .27 .27 .28 .28 .29 5.00 ELEV 12.72 12.74 12.78 12.81 12.84 12.87 12.90 12.93 12.97 13.00 6.00 DISCHG .29 .30 .30 .31 .31 .32 .32 .33 .34 .34 6.00 ELEV 13.04 13.07 13.11 13.15 13.19 13.24 13.28 13.32 13.37 13.42 7.00 DISCHG .35 .35 .36 .39 .42 .46 .50 .59 .67 .74 7.00 ELEV 13.47 13.52 13.58 13.64 13.70 13.76 13.83 13.95 14.10 14.26 8.00 DISCHG .80 .84 .87 .89 .91 .92 .94 .95 .95 .96 8.00 ELEV 14.41 14.54 14.64 14.70 14.75 14.80 14.84 14.87 14.90 14.92 9.00 DISCHG .97 .97 .98 .98 .98 .98 .99 .99 .99 .99 9.00 ELEV 14.95 14.97 14.98 14.99 15.00 15.01 15.02 15.02 15.03 15.03 10.00 DISCHG .99 .99 .99 .99 .99 .99 .99 .99 .99 .99 10.00 ELEV 15.03 15.04 15.04 15.04 15.04 15.04 15.04 15.04 15.03 15.03 11.00 DISCHG .99 .99 .99 .99 .99 .98 .98 .98 .98 .98 11.00 ELEV 15.03 15.02 15.02 15.02 15.01 15.01 15.00 15.00 14.99 14.99 12.00 DISCHG .98 .98 .97 .97 .97 .97 .97 .96 .96 .96 12.00 ELEV 14.98 14.98 14.97 14.97 14.96 14.95 14.95 14.94 14.93 14.93 13.00 DISCHG .96 .96 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .94 .94 .94 13.00 ELEV 14.92 14.91 14.90 14.90 14.89 14.88 14.87 14.87 14.86 14.85 14.00 DISCHG .94 .93 .93 .93 .93 .93 .92 .92 .92 .91 14.00 ELEV 14.84 14.84 14.83 14.82 14.81 14.60 14.80 14.79 14.78 14.77 15.00 DISCHG .91 .91 .91 .90 .90 .90 .90 .89 .89 .89 15.00 ELEV 14.76 14.75 14.74 14.73 14.72 14.72 14.71 14.70 14.69 14.68 EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDCMP COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PASS 3 RECORD ID EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION ENDJOB END OF 1 JOB IN THIS RUN RECORD ID 8 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER TIME OF CONCENTRATION 9 FARWEST STEEL RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER TIME OF CONCENTRATION STUDY POINT NO. 1 -PRE DEVELOPED CONDITIONS Soil Name and Cover Description Runoff Curve Area Hydrologic Soil Group Number (Acres) Name HSG RCN A RCN x A Snohomish D Meadow(Good Condition) 89 5.28 469.92 Totals 5.28 469.92 Runoff Curve Number=(RCN x A)/A. 89.00 Runoff Curve Number Used in TR-20 Input File. 89.00 Time of Concentration Used in TR-20 Input File(Minutes). 45.00 Time of Concentration Used in TR-20 Input File(Hours). 0.75 STUDY POINT NO. 1 -POST DEVELOPED CONDITIONS Soil Name and Cover Description Runoff Curve Area Hydrologic Soil Group Number (Acres) Name HSG RCN A RCN x A Snohomish D Lawn/Landscaped Areas 90 0.60 54.00 Snohomish D Impervious Areas 98 4.43 434.14 Snohomish D Detention Basin 100 0.25 25.00 Totals 5.28 513.14 Runoff Curve Number=(RCN x A)/A- 97.19 Runoff Curve Number Used in TR-20 Input File- 97.00 Time of Concentration Used in TR-20 Input File(Minutes). 12.00 Time of Concentration Used in TR-20 Input File(Hours). 0.20 9556RCN.XLS 10 2/14/96 DETENTION BASIN DATA 11 DETENTION BASIN NO.1 - POST-DEVELOPED CONDITIONS Water Surface Average Depth Incremental Total Total Orifice Orifice . Orifice Orifice Restrictor Restrictor Total Surface Area Surface Area Volume Volume Volume Head Outflow Head Outflow Head Outflow Outflow Elevation (SF) (SF) (Feet) (CF) (CF) (AF) (Feet) (CFS) (Feet) (CFS) (Feet) (CFS) (CFS) 12.00 5,800 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 5,890 0.20 1,178.00 12.20 5,980 1,178.00 0.0270 0.20 0.1282 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.1282 6,070 0.20 1,214.00 12.40 6,160 2,392.00 0.0549 0.40 0.1813 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.1813 . 6,250 0.20 1,250.00 1 12.60 6,340 3,642.00 0.0836 0.60 0.2220 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.2220 6,430 0.20 1,286.00 12.80 6,520 4,928.00 0.1131 0.80 0.2564 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.2564 H 6,610 0.20 1,322.00 13.00 6,700 6,250.00 0.1435 1.00 0.2866 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.2866 6,830 0.20 1,366.00 13.20 6,960 7,616.00 0.1748 1.20 0.3140 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.3140 7,090 0.20 1,418.00 13.40 7,220 9,034.00 0.2074 1.40 0.3392 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.3392 7,350 0.20 1,470.00 13.60 7,480 10,504.00 0.2411 1.60 0.3626 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.3626 7,610 0.20 1,522.00 13.80 7,740 12,026.00 0.2761 1.80 0.3846 0.05 0.0971 0.00 0.0000 0.4816 7,870 0.20 1,574.00 14.00 8,000 13,600.00 0.3122 2.00 0.4054 0.25 0.2171 0.00 0.0000 0.6225 8,300 0.20 1,660.00 14.20 8,600 15,260.00 0.3503 2.20 0.4251 0.45 0.2913 0.00 0.0000 0.7164 8,900 0.20 1,780.00 14.40 9,200 17,040.00 0.3912 2.40 0.4441 0.65 0.3501 0.00 0.0000 0.7941 9,500 0.20 1,900.00 14.60 9,800 18,940.00 0.4348 2.60 0.4622 0.85 0.4003 0.00 0.0000 0.8625 10,100 0.20 2,020.00 14.80 10,400 20,960.00 0.4812 2.80 0.4796 1.05 0.4449 0.00 0.0000 0.9245 10,700 0.20 2,140.00 15.00 11,000 23,100.00 0.5303 3.00 0.4965 1.25 0.4854 ‘0.00 0.0000 0.9819 11,200 0.20 2,240.00 15.20 11,400 25,340.00 0.5817 3.20 0.5127 1.45 0.5228 0.00 0.0000 1.0356 11,600 0.20 2,320.00 15.40 11,800 27,660.00 0.6350 3.40 0.5285 1.65 0.5577 0.15 0.5449 1.6311 12,000 0.20 2,400.00 15.60 12,200 30,060.00 0.6901 3.60 0.5439 1.85 0.5906 0.35 1.9420 3.0765 12,400 0.20 2,480.00 15.80 12,600 32,540.00 0.7470 3.80 0.5588 2.05 0.6217 0.55 2.8048 3.9852 12,800 0.20 2,560.00 16.00 13,000 35,100.00 0.8058 4.00 0.5733 2.25 0.6513 0.75 3.2753 4.4999 9566DET1.XLS 12 2/14/96 GOVERNING EQUATIONS: Low Flow Orifice Q=cxAx(64.4 x orifice head)^0.5 Orifice Coefficient,c• 0.62 Diameter of Low Flow Orifice(Inches). 3.25 Orifice Area,A(Square Feet). 0.06 Invert of Low Flow Orifice. 12.00 Low Flow Orifice Q=cxAx(64.4 x orifice head)^0.5 Orifice Coefficient,c• 0.62 Diameter of Low Flow Orifice(Inches). 4.00 Orifice Area,A(Square Feet). 0.06 Invert of Low Flow Orifice- 13.75 Overflow Restrictor(Weir Flow) Q=9.379 x D x(restrictor head)"1.5 Elevation of Overflow Restrictor 15.25 Diameter of Overflow Restrictor,D(Inches). 12.00 Transition Elevation(elevation at which flow over riser changes from weir flow to orifice flow)• 15.65 • Overflow Restrictor(Orifice Flow) Q=3.782 x D^2 x(restrictor head)^0.5 Elevation of Overflow Restrictor 15.25 Diameter of Overflow Restrictor,D(Inches). 12.00 Transition Elevation(elevation at which flow over riser changes from weir flow to orifice flow)• 15.65 9566DET1.XLS 13 2/14/96 DRAINAGE AREA MAP 14 0 .. EX SSW I 1061-17.63 I t'.• 11.1:311 LIcOleTXI FX.SSMN CM.FLONEINE(N.W.E/NPEM • RIMA15.76 CIR.rew4s,waser.o.e.sa S.W. 34TH STREET I 36-50 P•11111111.111r= 26 SD a'ss 0 -- •••••11-MMF .''" P411M•11 ... ' miLEFISO1 '-,,.-sr SD -a 4 36.12 W•55- 11•SS 36-S° . 141rAmmegoommongii . It . , pm, CONC.CURD•conu - MIS CUT --------..---- _ 9 ASPHALT _ • /71 V / \ .... ii - s - - __, , ....._ „. \ I . . $ ,.n. I-51 MAIER IN 121)-4:CEIDE S7DEWALK --J.11- ,3 ._ 1.11.... • lik4 . am. Ex.irw arc. •\ EX12 =I °TNEIN/.":214 POWER • A "//-RIPIT I..',,.,':.•:-. .:1 ix IRK- , ,,,,,,, \EX. oppr ..--• e,.,. __ moo ii. om N87'50 23 W Sr_ . N87'503"W __ 111 . MO 400.15. A MD.: T=Iffinq I r! .----- /' 7 1- \.. N38.73.50:3"Vi -\ 350.47' 1171.ANDSCAPE A I ) -/- OP/ 111107.-6 hi 111.1• SE=1 1 L/- __ F 7-- J.11...• , t IIi - ,.,‘,CONL:NE.CT,TO EX.- / .151-A"°Trs "PT''-',....,_......„, , 1 -" I. 1 ,./..,.\A.1....*\\) // . . N\‘\ fA <1 . 11 7/7 . .7 '. - \ U111./TI MIT. -„,--1.-, - IL.11M1 . CONCNEW PAD 1 II SWTANT WNW P0'.. \ T 1 t LeEITIT ON (..,••'-.--'?..- I ' I II . EX.55111-1 0 \ i I 'c'''' I' i 6= 8940 32 RW-16.76 Z II II j'• R = 55.00' CTR a-evr4s..4)-7.,6 I- N.. ( I I I . -;2 /1 • 1EPROMT.E.r.• I PHASE TIWO. WAREN / USE ' ' Ty,,, ...,___:_}1 11-4411- 1. 11 I) 1 1---'.----------,,,. C, L = 86.0 36'50- / Cti4 R -r-,55.00 1r HORIZONTAL DATJIA I I IN 6 I USED FOR INTERIM .ACII I P•1711.4 PAVED AREA I i (TyncALI ---rayaid pp:, ! N LE.17•02II. 11CAS165,0-P 6 ---7--7-----C I \ L =-A86.39* CITY OF RBVTON ) 5 250 SO PT .------"• ,-.. /js.„Les, .... 1 I Ni. NAD 83/91\ ! ' ''-i-1; tgi° "I::::/ 4=1 'EIM3 a Cfl 1 V T.' PIT GRASSED UNED WIER / I -01/, \ \ VERTICAL OARIA4 ----__ / QUAUTT SWALE I I- HI 111 o II ' 1 i .__V 123:3 ,,,,, ,..t... ‘, I ---.., ''' 1„ I A \ N a / ... a r4".11 l‘ir ..-1--- \4 CITY OF REN TON \ T/NYIRCIF RnOr attrioltRK TN:.672---- \6TIKET WECVA12r,,,-;.g.FNEcERTEZORTILK S'ERNKOUYIA .0ATSUN"--'6-------- --) RE E VSAERT"ONCE.EN:RosAAN*CE L , )73" 14. .g. II I , PHA,SE T W 0 WAREHOUSE 1 50700 SCI FT ...- CI:Ic• •-• ',..,„ ;TIfF gila j.r,s, • _ c,„... II ; I I ••'-'' / I I/ N. 1 I I.- • :" ‘) c• i 22 I a .,_.A__ 5.-.1.1 GH.T..,:. O TOUR INTERVAL- 2 FEET /111.. I III C.13 I : I ' I 'Mt 55S00 SO FT , t • ECM N / 1 la 1-TsD 0 \ Z\ DRAINAGE DIVIDE Ilia ./ I H. 1...-ID AT WADE LEVLY I/'' .t, • t/ -02 / \ - 11' ... ill .1 \ ..-/- /qt./ I • 7 T-20'ueurr aasame.':67.".''''''' 1 li 10'OTLITT :_0 T !ASEIIENT ////...,.. .TA. ›- I 1 1 < I 1 I \ I i ' . :.,,",;C.ST Esa, . \ // 7r /iPif ,. ' I I t __ I i , ,I I, ,' 0171 / A= 7 '03'49" ( i ) I iii +=I ODD Il 7 i 9111 Terg•cr • i „ , / R = 4-3.37' 1 i • = 588.60' / / \ , . ws6 INN PT 1 R...R.,"/I Iii, 1 I Exanumo CONCRE I 67,01.‘,V,- •• vamooe mew \ WADE LEVI. i 1 ''''',..,, TINCK WAX ' / / / \ 4 = 705836" ) / ii Y 1 i PAVED AREAS .,i CV,r-,P' oesa.moto Pewee \ =al. / / / . ___._ , / ny...38 („)..9,0 ,c,'•-. yp....*....17:17''" °I:- 0 r r 0 DI f. ./' I I, II . . ro, ,,,,, LL1 / --....,.. "3 . I --' i . I z '4, > Z ,,,' / Nks, / ----.,.,,, 7,-- N., - it I CM UZI 4 ....., 1 LLi s I:':, I ) / iiI I 1 ! I\ -..- , ..._ * U") > 1.•• I I al '11) I_LJ $ I fl / ,F=oszo.c FlommatAisiz a I i rr••meorrierr uwe or 1.1t0AEcT / dr . 0 ' /L.,I / /4/ • , I i i I 1 um ' ,.341- - AaP...-IL-1-4 ED , / TET:r- --1--%, Z AREA TO BE EXCAVATED FOR ..._.] ( .21 / MENTON STORAOE 101166.61 ELEV.A 11.00 /.. / • , //' .EMI NI!. ,I 00 SO FT ,,,, / / •••'0. • , 4, l., ,,,, I ll Ai 1 I - Z I / /r"t t '•z/ ,,\ '41:41:1,$!,Fil ,iiiICECI -CSS ...II 7 ,1.,,s" \i„I-SIM• WD"'i "'• %,j " 7/Z7 / ' f 11 I • - ‘ =3 i. , _..... CM/LOCUS R j _// 1-----is_________..........„:„-----;:00,0 e• ''''':" 0, ,,, ri, ..a.-' , 4',,Z n13 f OM I MI,: ' ••-""• ----- ' '' . . EASEMENT ___---.---•••'---- TEINI.SIGN///k (61.54,10.6.511 . *Via i ' -1------ • -cjj,....'7711....-"/ ----IC" --'•'.- 5.--41/00- ,-••'•'''..-- ______--IN- S 6 26 T-E.... ..- C. ._ .7--- -•-•.' ---- .P. .111'241. I- 125n I, , . /__UM------Ai_ _,.... -,. ...iiiipp- --"C --.. -••• ,,-------:------ ,-------- ___ ______ -I opa- 2.5X-.:. -- ---,---,.- A•,...... ...1• i -- , N87'50 47 W 517.58 -0 -----,-. / 10. ._,-___ al--- iinai=i .'1 "Zi, - .10.1 NM MO Olmis.. ..Lcs:I.'%re • _ 11:-......mi MI.WA• 111.1=RIME MMIll III INIINnim i ••••=MI MEM ... - 1/1___ N87'50.521W-1.-_------,N,i P ... -SNIP •--7 WArZniti =_-__:=7, . •------ KIMI ti cc la"OCNC RET WA/1 164 90' 10-Vi -. : 6.CONC.OIR9 A aurae L 9 II -' T _Iiir " __„---. , 1 ...---• 10.GONG ET.WALL .,-.-- -------- \ ,.., 1 • 12 SD . sin ...,, _------ ...... ... y, ,.1 ASPHALT 1.14. GRASS UNED WATER QUALM WALLS NO2.0913"E 20.CO' ASPNALT 12'W I - --..., ‘,0 "NT- "q -_ • -4: 151.6`Orflo CO t CS TYPE 6 04'D1A.1 W111 RESTRICTOR 6 03'4933" .4% 1 AND TPD STAGED ORRICES(2.25.II/XOEF) EW ____---- TOP ELEV.17 50 R 605.87' C.C e• TYPE LT LH T T. P tr NV.I 11.64 L 4046' : r T -; 1 CO 1 1S 0wcao El= 07.51.28" ,..., . ... 417 MRCSS/EGRESS ESN, It. 8 R = 605.87' A= 0233'54 E:.:•: TiNi."2: HiC.i-iE-..ii.6,":;.E: L = 83.09' R = 605.87' ' EX.DETENTICA1 RAW CONTROL STIO/CIVRE I. = 27.14' CC TOPS lice 110k1/-07-1ASE TOTAL AREA TO DETENTION BASIN = 5.28 ACRES DRAINAGE AREA MAP FOR FARWEST STEEL SCALE: V = 100' --------- -- ::.......:...... .............:.: ........::::.:::. �L_-, . ',ice :.2.`' j .) !• . ' • in ' - - ' G,EOTECHNICAL REPORT q. „F rwest Steel ' :: ; . . • • S 3t Street:„;::,„ Renton :� • �G Project No. 'T-306 p�v��orm + ��r'Nt�t��► ' ciYY of� r�TON ' • • .. , t,, „ �::{ ,„%ttt ; Terra Associates Inc_ : ; : '. !. :" '.:t: .......... .::::.: ..:.::.. , Prepared for ' ' Farw,est Steel:Corporation ` . E•ugene, Oregon::: ' ' , . - " ' •• . February 1,•,199C ' ' TERRA' ASSOCIATES, Inc. r‘ . s,. 4 ' Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geolo and Environmental Earth Sciences' February 1, 1.996' Project No..T-3'064 . I Mr. Dave Forester Farwest Steel-;Corporation , • P.O:.Box 889 Eugene, Oregon`97440 Subject Geotechnical Report, Farwest Steel ; SW'34th"Street Renton,Washington Dear Mr. Forester : . As requested,we have conducted a geotechnical:engineering.study for the subject.project..The attached, report our,:findin s and recommendations-for the 'eotechnical'aspects' of project designand P presentsg • P , construction. In general,the site is underlain by five to six feet of dense granular fill over several feet of organic silt or , : : peat: The organic silt-and peat are underlain by medium dense to dense alluvial sands:' A six to:seven foot thick layer.of very soft silty, clay',is:present at'a depth of about'32 feet below existing site grades. Medium dense silty'sand underlies the very soft silty clay • To reducepost-construction:settlements to tolerable levels' we recommend that the buildm -area be re ' loaded with a surchar a.fill. :Followin�g successful,com letion of the surchaz a program, the ' g P g P g proposed steel,fabrication'facility ;may be 'constructed' using conventional spread footings: placed on':the,',new structural' fill ad. The intolerance of the 'rail.cranes to' foundation settlement' requires usinga,Pile' pad. q, - foundation. The piles must extend through"the very soft silty clay found at a depth of 32 feet in order to minimize the potential'impact to them from differential settlement across'the site as aresult of longterm compression of the silty clay. 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101.:Kirkland, Washington 98034 • Phone (206):821=7777 Mr. Dave Forester - February 1, 1996 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service during the initial .design,phase of this:project and'look forward to working with you during the design and construction,phases': We trust the information presented in this report is sufficient for your current needs.. If you have any questions'or need additional information,'please call. Sincerely yours, - ,, TERRA AS t) TAT.ES,.INC. , '- Sj° St , Kevin P�Robe CLPie.'. % ,3 , Project E I gineerok' 1`,N. LI \`p ` 2a7.42 c • ''crslFaE / i .2'=/--96 .. •. 'Theodore J.•Scliepper P.E: Princi al Engine EXPIRES 6115/9, ' KPR/TJS ah.: cc: Mr. Bart Treece,Horton Dennis and Associates,Inc: Project No. T-3064 • " Page No. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS : ' 1 _ 1 0 -1 Project Description - : , ,• „ 1,. ,r 2.0 Scope'of Work, _ . 1 3.0 . Site Conditions , . :2 ` 3.1 Surface'. 2 3.2- Soils.. . 2 3 3 Groundwater 3 3:4, Seismic.Hazards 3 4.0, Discussion and.Recommendations 3. , 4'.1., General 3. 4.2.. Site.Preparation:and Grading 4'.3 . = Surcharge'and Settlements 5 4.4. Spread Footing Foundations 7 4:5 Rail Crane Foundation:Steel H-Piles 7:: 4.6` Rail'Crane Foundation-Augercast Piling_ 8 n= rade Floors 8., 47. S ab-o 4.8 Excavations. 9 Utilities - 9 4.10 Lateral Earth Pressures 9 4.11'. Drainage 1 Q. 4:12 Pavements 10 Additional:Services ,. ,11 , 6..0 Limitations 11' ` Figures ; . Vicinity Map Figure 1 Exploration Location Plan Figure: „ Typical Settlement Marker Detail „ ' ;Figure 3 Reinforced Soil Wall Section . Figure 4 Appendix Appendix A r' and Laboratory Testing, � -stiii Field Exploration `1 " Geotechnical,Report • - i Farwest.Steel: : SW 34th Street Renton, Washington,, ; : 1:0. PROJECT DESCRIPTION; _ The project will consist of constructing.a new steel fabrication plant in Renton,'Washington:' The location of the project site is:shown:blithe Vicinity Map, Figure 1 A conceptual Site plan dated November 15,•19;95 shows • the location of the 96,000 square;foot_steel fabrication building:and an attached 4000;square foot office space. Finished floor grades are expected.to be seven to eight feet_above'existing site grades: Access to the building will be from the south from an easement connecting to Lind Avenue. Traffic loading is expected to be heavy along the easement-and in parking areas at the perimeter of the structure. • ' The steel fabrication facility-Will consist of steel-frame construction with dock-high floors:,, We understand,that the.lower portion of the;perimeter walls may be constructed using pre-cast concrete tilt-up wall panels;.with the :' _ upper portion finished with a metal skin exterior. Floor loadings are expected to be relatively high,possibly 800 „ to:1,000-pounds per square.foot(psf): We understand wish to`support the buildng,using a spread footing foundation: .Overhead rail cranes,will also be used in the facility for interior transport of materials and products. ' - We understand the-cranes have:a low tolerance for differential settlement. = , . -The recommendations in the following sections of this report are based on Our understanding of the`project's • W.-Verify that our recommendations designfeatures. We should review final desi ,drawin s and specifications t .v- grify have,been properly interpreted'and incorporated into project design. ' 2:0 SCOPE OF,WORK On.:January;9 through 11,;1996; we drilled six test borings at the site"to'.depths ranging between 9.-and59 feet below existing;site grades:„ Using_the;information obtained from the"subsurface exploration, We performed ' analyses to develop-geotechnic4:recommendations_for project design and construction Specifically,this"report - .addresses the following; Soil and groundWater conditions, • Site preparation and grading Foundation alternatives . " • Surcharge arid settlements •• Lateral earth.pressures' , • Slab-on-grade floors •. Utilities Pavements. • Drainage requirements _ February 1, 1996 Project No. T-3064,, ; - 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS . 3.1 Surface - • _ • • The subject site is located on SW'34th Street between.Lind Avenue and the East Valley Highway in Renton, ' _ Washington.,This location-is shown on.Figure 1. The site is bounded to the south and'`north by^aHomeBase store and SW:34th Street,respectively, Open,undeveloped parcels bound the site"on,the east and west: The site and vicinity are flat ,We noted-a large pile of fill and debris near the northwestern corner of the site.. An absence of Vegetation indicated that relatively recent grading:was completed over the central and western portions'of:the site. :,The southwestern and eastern portions of the:site.-contained areas of standing'water and were vegetated with sparse grasses. The proposed'access easement area in_the vicinity of,Boring.B-2 was flat • - and contained-very.sparse grasses and some standing water. I Two'existin� railroad spur tracks,enter the roe from the-north and,curve westward within the property to g p property�S' p p m' — join a railroad.line extending"west across Lind Avenue. The tracks were raised slightly above surrounding grades: .Shallow.ditches filled with standing water were observed adjacent to each of the spur lines. No other obvious signs of surface water-.drainage were observed at:the site. 3:2 Soils . The soil conditions at the'site"generally consist of silty sand and sand,with gravel;fill overlying a variably thick` • layer of compressible peat or organic clayey silt.'The compressible soils were underlain by generally competent: - sand deposits.' The sand was found overlying loose to medium dense silty sand,:with a layer of very'soft silty clay present at the northern portion of the site at a depth-of about 32 feet:' • All of our borings showed fill soil comprised of gravellyto sil sand to depths ranging,from four to seven feet. g - P ty P This material was generally dense but.became loose near the,contact With the underlying native clayey silt and "peat: The compressible native soilunder the fill consisted mostly of gray to brown-gray, soft to stiff organic Silt,•and.silty, clay occurring to depths of,eight to nine feet. As shown.by Boring B-:1, dark brown soft to •medium stiff peat underlies,the fill to a depth of about 12 feet at the southern portion of the site. , -; We observed black medium dense to very dense sand underlying the compressible:strata. At Borings B-i and B-- , 6,we f• ound dark gray silty sand with shells that was loose to medium dense at a depth of about 36 feet Boring B-5 also showed gray very soft,silty clay with shells overlying'the gray silty sand between depths of about 30 -and 37 feet. I All borings were terminated within the black medium,dense:to'very dense sand or gray medium dense silty sand with-shells: Figures A-2.through A-7 in'Appendix'A present more detailed descriptions;of the subsurface`conditions.:encountered, in the test borings. The approximate test boring locations are shown on Figure 2: • • • Page No. 2: February 1, 1996 • Project No. T-3064 The Geologic Map,of the Renton'Quadrangle, ,King County, ,Washington by.D:R: Mullineairx (1965).shows • that the soils'are mapped as peat (Q1p).,; The peat encountered in-Boring B-1 correlates With the.published- ' description.`:However, the native.organic.silt and clay underlying the fill at the site correlates better with:the description of the nearby mapped.alluvium(Qaw)• 3.3' Groundwater. We 'encountered groundwater,in all of the test borings at depths ranging from ground surface to seven:feet. _ Some of the groundwater, encountered near the ground -surface'appeared-to consist .of:a perched zone of infiltration from recent heavy rains._In general,the groundwater table was found at depths ranging between four,: and seven feet. Due to'-its flat nature, groundwater depths are not ex ected:to vary significantlyover the site. However, we: expect some seasonal fluctuations in the position of the groundwater table..,. 3.4. Seismic Hazards . falls Within Seismic Zone 3.as classified bythe-Uniform Building`Code UB:C Based on The Pu et,$ound area (• , ) 1. the soil conditions;encountered and the local-geology, Table 16-Jof the 1994 UBC:indicates a site coefficient of 1.5 should be used in design of the structure:, We reviewed the results"of our field and laboratory testing in order to assess the potential for liquefaction of the.. site's soils during an earthquake. .Liquefaction is;a'phenorrienon where there is a reduction or complete loss of . soil strength:due to an increase in pore water pressure induced byvibrations•from a seismic event. -Based on the. . information.obtained and considering the additional confining',stresses from the'Wilding and:fill weight, it is'our opinion that the risk of liquefaction-related impacts to the structure are'minimal: ' 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 • General Based on our study,iri our opinion,there-are no geotechmcal constraints that would preclude'construction of the proposed steel fabrication facility: For building loads,the primary geotechnical concern.for construction at this site is the three to,five foot thick laYeY of or anic'silt'and peat at depths of,6 to12 feet below existing g rades , ' With these conditions, a surcharge program will need to be:coinpleted in'order to'support'the facility,using standard spread footing construction.. The purpose of the surcharge is to consolidate tle compressible soil • layers to limit post-construction settlements to an:amount that the,structure can tolerate: • Page No:3 • February 1, 1996 Project No. T-3064 The overhead rail crane's,intolerance of settlement imposes additional geotechnical'Constraints on the design and placement of its'foundation. Though competent sands underlie the organic clayey-silt and peat at the:site,these sands are underlain by a seven-foot-thick layer of very soft silty clay at a depth of 30;feet. Our analysis, indicates that the site will experience long-term total and differential settlement as this layer consolidates under the building and;fill.pad loads. While these long-term,settlements may be tolerated by the building; we expect their magnitude to exceed what could be tolerated by the crane. It will therefore be necessary to transfer the , crane's loads through the competent sands and underlying very soft silt to the medium dense to dense sand and. silty sand.. The'following sections provide detailed recommendations'regarding the above issues,and otherge'otechnical - design considerations. These .recommendations; should be incorporated into.the final design‘drawings 'and', construction.specifications: • 4.2. Site Preparation,and Grading - Following_clearing,the fill,surface should be proofrolled with heavy construction equipment prior to:placement. of additional All. ,Soft, yielding areas should be=overexcavatedto firmbearing soil and re• placed.with structural, fill. Where excavations to achieve firm conditions are excessive; the use of a geotextile fabric such as Mirafi '500X in conjunction with limited overexcavation and replacement with a structural fill can be-considered. Typically,.18 inches of clean granular structural fill over the fabric will.achieve:a'stable subgrade. Our laboratory, results'show that.the_existing fill was above its:optimum;moisture content at the_time of.our investigation. Some_of the fill soils'encountered at the site contain up to 14 percent by weight of fines and will • • ' be difficult to compact if the moisture conditions cannot be carefully,controlled. Extreme`care should be taken to ensure that,exposed surfaces of the on-site,fill do not become'disturbed due to weather'and construction traffic.- Moreover;the ability to use these soils as,structural-fill will depend,on..their moisture content and the prevailing weather,conditions at the time of construction.-It will be,diffrcult to-achieve proper compaction of , these soils-when their moisture content is above optimum. When the moisture is excessive,the soil can be dried • by aeration to a moisture content which:will,allow for proper.coinpaction. ' _ We recommend that the structural fill required to achieve site grades consist of inorganic granular soil,meeting the.following-grading requirements: : , Maximum Aggregate Size - 6 inches - Minimum Retained on the No 4 Sieve = 25 percent Maximum Passing.the No..200Sieve .- 25 percent, (Based on the Minus 3/4-inch Fraction) ,(see following narrative) If fill placement takes place during wet weather, or if the.moisture conditions of the fill material, cannot be _ controlled, consideration should be given to importing fill soil that conforms with the above gradation,but with the maximum passing theNo.:.200'sieve reduced'to five percent. • Page No: 4 Febru :1- 1996 Project No. T-3064.. •Structural fill materials should be P placed in uniform loose layers not exceeding 12.inches"arid compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the soil's maximum- density, as determined by ASTM Test Designation:D-698 (Standard Proctor). The moisture content of the soil'at the.time"of compaction should be within about two percent of its"optimum;.,as determined by this same ASTM method.. - . Prior to placing foundations and floor slabs,we recommend'probing or proofrolling the structural fill surfaces to determine if any isolated soft and yielding areas are present. As discussed above, soft or yielding areas should be overexcavated.:and filled to grade with structural fill or crushed rock. . It-maybe-.necessary to protect foundation and slab areas. with Lean,mix`or "a layer of crushed ;rock.to guard' against:soil degradation:, Construction traffic miist'ziot be allowed on subgrades that haVe been prepared just prior to foundation or slab placement.' A representative of Terra Associates, Inc..should observe all proofrolling 'operations. We also • recommend field evaluations at the time of construction to verify,stable subgrades. • 4.3. Surcharge and Settlements • " As discussed for spread footing foundation support and slab-on-grade construction; we recommend placing a - surcharge fill over the bmlding_area.- The surcharge program is necessary to limit.building.settlements to what may be considered tolerable levels .- Our surcharge and settlement analysis is based on at assumed existing• • ground surface elevation of 12 feet. In addition, our analysis is based on a finished floor (top=)f--slab) elevation of about 20 feet, and the anticipated floor loads discussed above. We'should review the final foundation and . grading plans in order to better assess expected settlements. • : Primary Consolidation The site grades should be raised using structural fill as outlined in_the.Site Preparation and Grading,section. • Oncegrade is achieved, an additional eight feet of fill should'be placed as a surcharge. This surcharge fill does ` not need to meet,any special requirements other than having a minimum.in-place unit weight,of 125 pounds,per• cubic foot(pcf): However,•it may be advisable to use a good quality fill which could be used to raise grades in other portions of the site, such as parking and driveway areas,if necessary" We do not believe it to be necessary to place a surcharge of fill within the parking and access easement areas if • grades at these'areas are raised to elevations comparable to the building area. In any case,the structural fill pad in the',pavement areas should be placed concurrently with the structural,fill in the building areas to allow enough time for consolidation of the compressible layers and reduction of.potential settlements. • The.estimated total primary settlements under the recommended surcharge range from 12 to 18 inches across the building area: These settlements are minded to occur 12 to _16'weeks following full application of the ' surcharge loading. The actual period for completion and magnitude Of the primary settlements will be,governed F . by variations in subsurface conditions at the site. • Page No:5 • • February 1;:1996. P'ro'ect No:'T-3064 J '•__ The rate "of consolidation can be accelerated by.installing-sand or wick drains;at regularly 'spaced intervals • throughout the pre-load fill pad. Alternatively, an additional.thickness of.-fill surcharge will'accelerate the;rate• , - • of primary settlement._ The sand drains"should penetrate a_Minimum of five feet into'the gray-black fine sand.` :' • • underlying the organic silt or peat layers: With the pre-load pad`in place, we estimate the sand drains-will be 30 ' . . to.35 feet long. Proprietary wick drains may be used: in lieu,Of sand'.drains.`,.We.can provide 'specific , , recommendations for either option if acceleration of the surcharge settlement period,:is desired;:;.. ' To verify.the amount of.settlement and the rate of movement;,the surcharge;program should be monitored by , • installing settlement markers: :Atypical settlement marker installation:is shown on 'Figure 3. The,settlement markers'should beinstalled:on the existing grade prior to placing'any building'or surcharge fills.; Once installed, . .elevations of both.the fill height:and markershould be recorded daily by a registered land surveyor until the full: height of the surcharge is in place. Once'fully surcharged, readings'should'Continue weekly until-the anticipated . . settlements have occurred. • It is' critical that the grading.contractor,recognize the importance of the.settlement marker installations: All, • •efforts must he made to protect the markers from damage-during fill•placement,.,It is difficult,if not impossible; to;evaluate the''progress;of the:surcharge program if the markers are damaged- or destroyed• .by:construction - ': equipment: As a,result,'it may he necessary to install.new markers and.to extend the surcharging:time to ensure - • that settlements have,ceased,and building construction can begin.`; - ' We recommend that the surcharge pad-extend,a minimum.of'five:feet,beyond the building perimeter and then slope down at an inclination of 1 1"(Horizorital:Vertical). The,conceptual site plan shows the northern building: , perimeter,'may be 20,feet from SW 34th Street.:This would place the toe'of the 15'-foot high fill pad at the edge . of.the -roadwa : Where 'sufficient'area is.•not'available.to sloe the surchr e and to•reduce impact' of, . Y p ag.. settlements due to, surcharge,on the existing roadways, the surcharge may`be ',supported.;at a near vertical • inclination(minimum 1:12)using reinforced soil wall. Figure-4 shows a typicalal'reinforced-soil wall:section:` • Post-construction`Settlements Primary consolidation:of compressible soils-at the site.will be achieved upon;completion of thesurcharge(pre ' load)program. Secondary`consolidation will continue at the;site:throughout the life of the structure: During.secondary,consolidation, you should expect a maximuin,post-construction total settlement of 1.5 inches, 'and differential settlement,of,3/4 inch. These values'represent,expected settlements over'a 50,'year period' We anticipate_tnat.most of these settlements will occur within five to ten years•after completion of the structures • "- • Impact of Surcharge on Adjacent Roadway and Utilities- ,. •Depending.on its location,the,proximity'of the surcharge,fill pad to SW 34th Street and the railroad•spurs may :, result:in settlement'of these structures'due to soil beneath them being influenced by the„preload fill pad: We , . - :recommend;placing monitoring'pomts on.the.roadway curbs and pavement to record possible movements during-'. surcharge. A similar monitoring program should be implemented for the railroad spurs•if they cannot tolerate possible settlement from the pre-load. • , Page No 6 -' • February1 1996 , • Project No. T-3064 Will be di'sturbed.b ytraffic: Sufficient momtoring'porrrts should.be-estabh m shed.sce_some of these points,, y In addition,we suggest,making a.photographic survey of the pavement before placing the surcharge to identify - development of new'cracks•during and after,the area is surchargedi -We understand a fiber optic;telephone transmission cable,is located within a;utility easement adjacent to SW : • • 34th Street: This Utility;line"as well as other utilities within:the easement may experience vertical and/or-lateral • movement as a'result..of the stress changes:in the soil associated`with the placement Of a pre-load fill pad. ,'.Utility organisations should be prepared to relocate utilities:as required prior to construction.of the pre-load: _ : , 4.4 Spread Footing Foundations i- - Following the successful completion'of-the:surcharge program, if the above estimated.settlements are considered tolerable,the building,may be supported on conventional spread foundations bearing on a minimum of two'feet, - of structural'fill. Existing 'competent'fills may be included in determining the depth of the:'structural fill. Perimeter foundations exposed to the weather should be at a'miniimum-depth,of•.1:5 feet below final exterior. Fades: . We recommend designing foundations for a net allowable bearin&capacity'of 3;000 psf: For short-terin loads such as wind and seismic, a 1/3 increase-in this allowable capacity canbe:used. 'With the.:anticipated.loads,and - bearing stresses,the estimated total settlements are as discussed inthe Secondary Settlements section.: For,designing_foundations to;.resist lateral loads, a base friction coefficient of 0':4 can be used. .Passive earth pressures•"acting'on;the side of the footing.and buried portion of the'foundation;stem wall can also be considered. , We recommend calculating this.lateral resistance using an equivalent fluid Weightof350.pa-'We recommend not acluding:the upper 12 inches of soil in this computation because:they can .be. affected by weather or , disturbed by;future grading activity: This:value assumes-the foundation will be constructed neat against.` ` competent fill soil or backfilled with-structural~fill as described in the Site Preparation and grading'section. The _ - recommended lateral resistance value includes a safety `of 1.5. _ 4.5. • - Rail Crane.Foundation Steel H-Piles. •• We understand you are considering using steel H-piles for transferring overhead rail•crane loading below the • 'consolidating layers at the site. We estimate.that`a W12-x 5`8,steel Pile will achieve an allowable axial load of - '_- '30 tons when driven to elevations of 40 to 45 feet below'existing surface grades. This allowable axial load takes.into account potential'negative•loading•caused by dowdrag on'.the pile due to consolidation of; the compressible layers underbuil'ding fill and floor slab loading: • : , Full axial.capacity can be used provided the piles are spaced at a minimum of three pile:diameters. Closer• 'spacing in-pile groups will require a reduction in the single pile capacity.; This-reduction will,depend on the. the pile ile'group arid the spading used. For resistance:to lateral loading, a lateral ile ca aci' . - number of piles in . . .P , ln' .P arid p g g, , p P tY. of four tons can be used: :The:estimated pile settlements are 1/4 inch nand less,'excluding settlement dueto elastic- ' Shortening.of the pile itself. ; - February;1, 1996 Project No. T-3064 The pile driving;hammer used to install the piles.should have-sufficient-energy to drive the piling to the;estimated tip elevation without damage to the'pile. .We also recommend that,prior to ordering'.production piles•and their installation, a minimum=of three test piles be driven at the site to verify anticipated tip elevations and establish driving criteria for use in evaluating production pile capacities.. The test piles should be'driven,with the same _ equipment that will:be used the production pile installations., _ • 4.6 Rail Crane Foundation Auzercast Piling ' Augercastpilingcan be considered_as an alternative to steel piling in transferring rail crane foundation loading below the consolidating layers at the"site:..For.16-inch.diameter pilings with minimum tip elevations of 40 feet , below existing surface grades, an allowable;axial load of 35 tons.is available-for design. This loading takes into . . account the potential negative loading effects.due to downdrag. _ " Similar reductions in pile:capacity as those discussed above can be.expected,when piles are placed,in groups. For,resistance to lateral loads, an allowable lateral pile capacity of four tons is available: The estimated pile _ settlement is' 1/4 inch and less, , .. Au gercast PileS are formed_by the:•ressure injection,of out through a.hollow stem an get which is slowly : n the recomme nded'tip elevation. Thegrout; ressure used will retractedfrom the ground.after advanceme t to p p , . compress'the soils within the immediate vicinity of the pile, thereby increasing to 'some extent the pile.diameter and the amount.of grout required to construct the pile. For planning purposes, we suggest considering a 30 percent increase in the;amount of grout necessary.to form the pile. • ` -In construction of augercast piling, a higher than normal reliance on quality workmanship'is required -for successful installations. It is extremely im ortant thatrthe out,pressure is consistent and uniform during the p grain . . installation and that retraction of the auger occurs at a slow uniform pace beneath a sufficient head of grout'in the pile column. The contractor should'have adequate means for verifying-grout pressure and estimating the volume of grout used in the construction'of the piles.. Because of the'compression effects and'the possible influence on adjacent pile construction;the installation sequence should be based on a minimum pile spacing of five pile diameters: Once the grout column has achieved its initial:•24 hour set, pile construction in'between these spacings can be completed ` • , 4:7 Slab-on-grade Floors With site preparation_completed.as described in the.:Site.Preparation and'Grading-section; new structural:fill. soils should be suitable for supporting-'slab-on-grade construction: ;.Immediately below the floor slabs, we recommend that an allowance be,Made for placing a six-inch layer of clean free-draining sand or gravel which has less than five percent passing-the'No: 200 sieve. This capillary break will guard against wetting of the floor. • slab due to the underlying soil conditions ; Where moisture via vapor transmission is not desired,;a polyethylene vapor.barrier should,also be installed. We suggest that this vapor barrier be.placed on an initial four inch layer.of the capillary break material and then covered with the final two.inches`:to help .protect it during,construction and to;aid in uniform curing of the concrete floor slab. For slab thickness'design with respect to floor deflection due to traffic and pointloadings;-a =. subgrade modulus,of 300.pci(pounds per cubic inch),can be used: Page No.,8 February 1;-.1996 ; • Project No. T-3064 . Estimated floor slab settlements of less,-than,3/4 inch;are expected due to post-primary consolidation._ ,This .; movement assumes that settlements due to'required building fills,would be allowed to occur prior to floor slab construction. The floor movements would'be entirely differential with respect to the foundation-construction: 4':8 Excavations ,.Excavations greater-than four'feet in depth will need to be completed in accordance with local,'state, or:federal ; ' regulations:; In accordance'with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration-(OSHA),"'inorganic soils encountered at the site would be classified as Group C soils. Accordingly, excavations:made within the native soils or fill at the site greater than four feet in depth but not exceeding 20 feet in depth will need to be laid back with:side slope gradients 'of:1.5:1. ; Due to the low strength characteristics .of:the on-site silty peat, we , recommend that excavations within this material be shored using a ditchbox or temporary bracing. - Optionally,,the..use or a trench"shoring.box to support,excavations throughout the lower:depth may be used in ` conjunction with sloping of the upper'portion of the excavation'as outlined above. Dewatering of the excavation will need to be considered where excavation depths.exceed five feef-below existing site grade. : • 4.9. Utilities . - • ' We recommend that,all sitee"utilities be bedded,"and 'backfilled:'`in accordance ,with applicable APWA specifications:.; For site utilities within City rights-of way, .bedding and backfill should' he completed in. accordance'with'City of'Renton.specifications.'`.At a minimum,'utility-trench backfill-should be placed and.- compacted in accordance with recommendations:presented iri the Site Preparation and,Grading:section.'.Where ' utilities will occur-.below:unimproved"areas, the degree,of compaction can be reduced,to.a minimum-of 90 percent,of the ,soil's maximum density-as, determined by the referenced ASTM;standard:. Because:Of the , potential for long-term settlements, utility pipe joints and connections should.be of flexible nature allowing for Up to one inch of differential movement. 4.10 Lateral Earth•,Pressures_ The magnitude of earth pressure development on retaining walls;constructed in loading dock areas will:partly depend on.the,quality of backfill. Where fill is placed behind.retaining-walls, 'recommend placing and compacting it as structural fill. The fill should be compacted to a minimum of 95 .percent of its-maximum dry ..' ;unit weight as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-698 (Standard Proctor). To guard against the,build.up • of hydrostatic pressure,wall,.drainage must also,be installed as discussed in the drainage section. With granular-backfill placed and:compacted'as recommended;and'drainage properly installed, we recommend :designing restrained' (riot` free-to deflect) retaining 'walls;`for an at-rest.earth pressure :equivalent to,"a.fluid.. weighing 50 pcf:. For unrestrained walls (free to deflect),this value May be reduced to 35 pcf., These values do, - ' . . not include other surcharge loading such as adjacent footings or sloped backfill that may act on these walls'. .If. '- • such conditions,will`exist,then the imposed:loading'must be included in the wall design. Friction at the base of foundations`and:passive`earth pressure"'will. provide resistance to these lateral loads: Values for' these -parameters are provided in the Foundations section of this report. : ' Page,No: 9 . February'1, 1996 •• - 6:Project,No: T30 4 4.11 Drainage` Surface Final exterior, grades should promote`-free and•positive drainage away-from„the building areas at.all.-times. ;' Water must not be:allowed to pond or collect adjacent to foundations or within:the:immediate building area ',We:_ ,recommend providing a gradient of.at-least three percent for a minimum,distance of ten feet,from the building; r 'enof one percent should�be Provided eriineter exec t.in'paved locations: Ire paved locations-:ainunimum gradient p p p . • • ions are included for collection and disposal of surface_Water to the.structure.. unless proves .. padjacent Subsur ace_ • on ei eter:foundation'drains:•would not be:necessa if xhe.•area immediatel •adjacent�'to the In our'o uu , run .- rY y J p p structure•is`paved and positive surface drainage maintained.,;If the grade is,not positively drained away from the ,structure or is landscaped,perimeter foundation drains shouldbeanstalled;.: - _ . • To gu4rd against`hXdostaticpressure develoPment,'retaining, drainage must be installed: Wrecommmend • wall draina e'consist of.a,mi�nimum 12-inch thick y of:washed rock or, ea gravel. laced adjacent to-the - that glayerp g , -. P, J • walla,A four-inch diameter:perforated pipe.,should; placed on a bed'•of:gravel at the base of the wall:footing • • and.gravel"drainage_ column. ;The pipe should be directed to a:suitable outlet: 4.12' , Pavements,1 With subgrade soils prepared as: described;in the Site Preparation and Grading. sections suitable support for .; i avement:construct on.should,be, rovided. •However, regardless of the compaction results obtained, subgrades � g P must be in a stable non--yielding condition,prior to pavingAnimediately•prior to paving;the area of the subgrade should be,proofrolled with heavy construction equipment to verify this condition: The required pavement-thickness is not only•dependent upon.the supporting capability.of the subgrade soilsbut;. • -also on the traffic.loading''conditions which will be applied For light,commercial"vehicles and typical passenger vehicle traffic,the following'pavement sections are recommended Two inches of asphalt,concrete(AC) over four inches:;of crushed rock base(CRB) - _ • • • 'Two iiiches=of AC over two inches of asphalt treated base(ATB) - _• For heavy truck traffic areas,we:recommend the following pavement sections:.'" Three mches of AC over six inches of CRB Three inches of AC over four inches.of ATB •Pa a No. 10, : . g • February 1,.19.96 -P ro'ect No T- 3064 If there is a'potential that pavement.construction will be,delayed until the wet winter months;the subgrade soils must consist of a-clean granular material as-described in.the Site Preparation and Grading section. ;In-addition, • we;strongly suggest that the subgrade be further protected by placing,a layer of ATB on-.which,construction traffic could access;the:project without excessively disturbing the subgrade soils.. The.ATB thickness for this purpose.should -be -four.inches. Repair of failed ATB.areas.should be anticipated" prior to final,paving.-;, However,:the overall integrity;of the subgrade soils will;be considerably less impacted with this•protection. provided.', Because of"second - "compression of the organic silt layer, degreep_some of ost-construction;settlement'within` Y the pavement "structure'should be anticipated. This settlement will probably:result in,some longitudinal and: transverse cracking,of the pavement :Cracks in the pavement should be sealed in a timely.fashion to prevent_ into.the.sub subgrade soils'', Water infiltration excessive surface wat ; g 5.0, ADDITIONAL SERVICES = Terra Associates, Inc. should review the final design and specifications in order, to verify that earthwork and ' foundation`recommendations have been properly interpreted and incorporated in the project design, We should also provide geotechnical services,_during construction in order to observe compliance with the design concepts,`; specifications, and recommendations. This will also allow for design'changes if subsurface conditions,differ from those anticipated prior to•the'start of construction. • We,request a minimum of two,working days notice be given to schedule,our;services`during construction. 6.0 LIMITATIONS. We prepared this.report in,accordance With generally accepted-geotechnical engineering,practices., This report is the property of Terra Associates,Inc: and is intended for specific application to the Farwest Steel project in _ :. Renton, Washington,',.This report is for the exclusive use of Farwest Steel:Corporation and their authorized• • representatives: No other warranty,•expressed or implied,is;made. : n data obtained'from the test b orin s edu o The al �ses and recommendations Presented in this report are bas $ an Y P p P, become evident extent.ofwhich-May.not drilled on-site: Variations in soil:conditions can occur,the nature and ariConditions , until construction: If variations appear evident, Terra Associates; Inc. should he"requested:to reevaluate the recommendations in this'report prior to proceeding with-construction." • Page No: l 1, N, -K • • r�r �. . s — �1 "��n 4 5. , IET.• ♦� • 81 A,8 ..�N IlinprpARt y • / •- 7 g�'}\ ' I i � 31 s�w /-NT V1) Err. IUE - , _ :' ® Dry - '\777. 'A ° ENTON . � S REHTON VILLAGE.PLr ', _ S]lTH ni Cr, '\ -' ;IQ 2 m.• �� - Vr.f7; — s3—� ' - Z 20 X s _ _ �!�- iiiiS 16TH ST `'�T19?IIUifib �.. iii�i ��'I!rlfl at • S u `l� -iiigTXr,. 1 `i �i ��'405 I- g ?< ' '! 9LY0 j1: e.TM$ d, �I x."'!'• V,.4vU %\ Q 'l_ , I ® df' 1 �I m� Ll.I ILL; 'S 39TH ST: =EA1B0I X r,,, ,. •:-4! • PKWY' ' e�. -1,-. RACF' .C1�., 9uzisT® �'. mlzr}per` ;.. 1'�S + PUGET•w4�G : .GRFFH ' •t �iRtiCK. 3 - ® ,1 ' N..� w,u`IST E1 . . `^ SW 23RD j' "s_23RD'1\L . TLC^' -ry@,RLYD f�'R N ITON � • II aMIN_ `��,,�'Ofii1�.,�-.an� IS z e SE 1..T I S S rf,. 79t,TC1 S'78OI-ST:7. - - o 1N0Ds� NCTI'O . 1 1 29TH•ST-'. ,� ' �'' J y15TX:' s[ iTMLst7�rrxnl' - 25 I - 30 :.c -N ;, , '.• 'TX[T '^ •$ s , I. / _, • SW 30TH - > 29 ., ,E E. , •FS ai'' , •% I ST - ' -SF--?SST'-Si16ETMF J7, < <' Co = . 1�' SW an 33Rp SY 33R0,5T I _ .;1 TX rl [T Z•j,j - - ' , vs g 'SE 169TH L- -- - ` lD , 4 ST - I , Ie97X�n ,,,,,'e'.rl., . • SE- 1t 7r1N ST 7. _pi I S•li26 ST'sv r ® 1726 ST . • , 1� SN=`387H SW::ill"IT J l• -;,.., ' '' , -4 , ' 'ems< SCE:7izS SI - ' "' I T" S 77<TX ST '.I - / l .. SW^391 , S 'Ni• s.�a h �!gi I.S - . �V3 "h st -E' • ,,i F' SE. 1767E DR �RILLA� x ' 1'01 I-.E IN .,,,2 ' ' l',.•' '., .-','. 21 S',ig. < _ s .. . n ,m• 1 'c 4'" I M ,511179TXI'rL. ' ap,R:. �� i� Sly 43RD 5T1 '!: --1. . Q• rmn,f 1' t` �Ia -e c�,. SW• I _r. 3Rp 5'. I n 'Et 16:ni sT, , � :® 1ST SE'• pa LEE, ,S WI1STST rt• I I .T l�� 1 'SE ?''o.• W.,A 9e, . x ! n-_ -, yr. I �1}I ,`' SE- 182ND1< • -. '; `, Csts!• 's 11020 r 1 is 4.1 , - _ ,., DR �J•..l SI ,S tjr 36 - L, _i' •' sa_sT«o..: -• I 6` SE, 16[' .1....TQOD ,•.I +' SGREFNBE�K o���iC �I�� il :3T', y _ _. , • AJ,�•'T��3RPL IEE,� REVp _ H i ! . /•- . • •I I •`W , 1RCTHi^ . '. LAP; ,. :1'861' ST . . • .� /-- ' ;'' R _N 4 N = N Sri �6 ST .-3 - r1 . SE IE5T« 1 , I. I • 9 1RRTH ST' NW•- I„ %s 187TH ST p ",o.. sr =ie st o .. _ = t s[IBE1,1 F r • lE1,n.CT 190TH 1.' S' 19DTH S'I - /j - - "N I 1 190TH ST Ni '190TH Si • \+� ,� St MTh51 sesrg _ I - r O Sl[.i97TN S 5[1901n rl '. - --j- - - -s. St. 192ND ' Si < T92ND• S_ - S 55TH '9- Tsa" } ST+, I- . :If .. SE.' `I " 3 � ,' �,, •S 57.�- ^ , , SW 1saTH $ SW 1GTH .ST W� I i I �, 1� IeL,a— • a •ST I : _ s��.-�Jr I. £-ysc to St 154:1i cs ``C)E _C-i."' I. �I ` asXv.= I-� _— _ Sr.n -' 95, ' . S 196TH 'ST S 196TH-i I TH • • • • .- P. I .c _',19BTH ST ''<.li S_r19RT ST �1. s 57 'I NI' '- .r ^ "' S ETH n N 11`�. ., '. I '1 'y<1 _ �a ig9TH _, 3 .• S 200TH s m 200TH S .. ' S 6' - -200TH'11'II 'S - - -,Pow g 57 . 1 '^ 1-i SE 1200TH ST 9DJO , �5 '202ND.�' ST Nl ' 1' 7 �\ . 7. '� :s� '. "%�- „REFERENCE: THE";THOMAS GUIDE,..KING. ,COUNTY, W.ASHINGTOiy,•PAGES,655, 656, 685.AND'' 6.86, 1995 EDITION." - VICINIY• . .MAP > - `", :":: TERRA :' .FAR,WEST STEEL •' - . •�0\\ . - RENTON WASHINGTON :,.e . .•': ASSOCIATES otechnical' Consultants • Proj. No.3064 Date :1/96 Figure : 1 • fl S W. 4tt STREET • - Two I I 3 50 5yii. - I 1 � . ,• _. , = o : ! _ B-6 / /1' ` 's - , .i— tL.' LA ..‘ '' ' i S B-5 i: - _ ce .. : : I • _ ... B-2 . _ D LEGEN .REFERENCE: APPROXIMATE: BORING LOCE;TION ,- SITE PLAN PROVIDED_. BYHORTON'. DENNIS 'AND , ASSOCIATES, INC:, JOB No. UNKNOWN', SHEET _ - ------ :10 ft. LANDSCAPE EASEMENT. ` No. SB5.GCD,.'DATED 1/24/96. ' - , ' ALONG STREET FRONTAGE ., - - - - -.---.--- - - - — - _ _ -- - .. _ - - APPROXIMATE SCALE - • RAILROAD CENTERLINE - -- ----, PROPOSED RAILROAD CENTERLINE -` , 1 , 100• 0 - 100 . 200 feet ; '- - EXPLORATION. LOCATION,PLAN eal.l TERRA ' :.FARWEST STEEL: `,�� a6. ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON , ` Geotechnical Consultants. ' Proj.. No.3064 Date 1/96 Figure '2 -, • STEEL ROD 0 - . • PROTECTIVE SLEEVE HEIGHT VARIES r • SURCHARGE : .i•: • (SEE NOTES) + . : .:. SURCHARGE" , OR. FILL :� - +• . . OR: FILL. II - � � � \ \i\/\ �• � • , ,NOT TO SCALE - NOTES: 1 BASE CONSISTS'. OF 1/2" THICK, 2'z2'. PLYWOOD WITH CENTER DRILLED.:5/8" ,DIAMETER" HOLE: • 2.. BEDDING MATERIAL, IF REQUIRED, SHOULD CONSIST'OF CLEAN COARSE-SAND,. 3. MARKER ROD 'IS ..1./2". DIAMETER STEEL ROD THREADED 'AT ,BOTH; ENDS.: • _ 4: MARKER ROD IS ATTACHED TO BASE BY NUT AND WASHER,.ON EACH SIDE OF BASE. 5.'.'PROTECTIVE. SLEEVE'SURROUNDING MARKER ROD SHOULD CONSIST OF 2"; DIAMETER • PLASTIC TUBING. SLEEVE IS NOT ATTACHED:TO ROD OR BASE:.' • - 6.c ADDITIONAL SECTIONS OF STEEL. ROD CAN. BE CONNECTED WITH"THREADED COUPLINGS. 7: ADDITIONAL SECTIONS OF. PLASTIC PROTECTIVE SLEEVE CAN BE CONNECTED WITH:.PRESS-FIT PLASTIC:COUPLINGS: _ 8."`STEEL MARKER:.ROD SHOULD EXTEND AT LEAST 6" ABOVE TOP 'OF PLASTIC PROTECTIVE SLEEVE. • • 9. STEEL MARKER:ROD,SHOULD EXTEND. AT LEAST 1' ,ABOVE TOP`,OF.'PILL SURFACE. • TYPICAL SETTLEMENT MARKER' DETAIL TERRA . FARWES.T ,STEEL � \ RENTON, .WASHINGTON ASSOCIATES • ' „Geotechrucal Consultants Proj. No. 3064 • Date 1/96 'Figure 3 , SLOPE 1:2:1 V,H) , • GEOTEXTILE FACING, - ,_COMPACTED :STRUCTURAL FILL = t 2% �MAX: DRY,. DENSITY • WRAP' t 'ical -95% , ! MINIMUM. •� (YP ) -• , ,'• . OPTIMUM,^MOISTURE CONTENT- PER D698 --(STANDARD PROCTOR) .' . =.0.8H feet (TYPICAL) r 3 feet. • ' (TYPICAL) .. H feet : • 18 in: (max.) ' • MIRAFI 5T • ' ' • ' .. • , . , I GO •. ' . .. '^ (TYPICAL). . • • • •• • •.. ,. . NOT TO SCALE' REINFORCED SOIL :WALL SECTION ' - .,� ' n r-:.',:° TERRA :FARWEST :STEEL : �� ASSOCIATES R'ENTON, -WASH"INGTON' • ' ' GeptechnIcal' Consultants Proj..No.:3064, ..Date 1/96 ; Figure 4 FIELD"EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING:, • Farwest Steel,;,' Renton,Washington• On'January 9 through 11, 1996, we performed our field exploration using a truck-mounted hollow stem „ auger drill:rig. We explored subsurface soil and groundwater conditions,at the site by drilling six hollow" stem'auger test borings to a'maximum depth of 59 feet below existing grade. The-test boring locations., are shown:on Figure.'2._ Test hole elevations" were interpreted from 'the USGS Renton Topographic Quadrangle. The Boring Logs are presented on Figures A-2'through A-7. • ; . thesoil . . each testhole as it:was�drilled' classified An eri' ' eer"from our office'maintained a to o f g .. conditions encountered, arid obtained representative soil samples: All soil samples .;were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System shown on Figure A-1: • Representative soil:"samples were:obtained froth'the test borings"using sampling procedures,;outlined in ASTM Test Designation,D-1586:'(Modified Proctor). The samples were placed in jars or tubes:;(ring • samples):,and taken to;our laboratory for further examination and testing. The moisture content of each sample was measured and.is`reported on:the Boring Logs.,,Plasticity characteristics of the fine-grained, - soils were determined by conducting Atterberg limits tests.'; Consolidation tests were 'performed On _ samples of the organic:silt and silty clay obtained during drilling of Borings B-5 and;B-6..`Grain size analyses were performed on eight of the samples. The:results of the-grain size analyses;are presented as Figures A-8 through.A-i T. . • • • • Project No. T-3064 „ Boring. ;No.' B-1: _ , '- Logged by: KPR • Dater 1'/9/96 , . r Approximate ;Elev:_ 12, - a� a N Water' Graph/ ' ,' Relative . - „ De.pth" " ' �. Blows/ Content !" USCS- ' Soil, Description, / p Density, (ft.) 0 foot (V) 9 Brown-gray gravelly medium sand , {Sr pp a; :FILL cuttings:saturated. - i : :� z"': FILL: Dark gray siltySAND with, , " ' SM Very Dense _ ''61 7.8 - gravel,;fine to mediminlrained,moist. :. { ::>. 5 . : ::: '''✓::, ALL:"Dark"gray silty SAND with •- 4:::, •i�^•`'• SP ;?%r� few gravel,fine to medium- Loose" "-.':<,.;::>, k. .grained,saturated: - i, is.n,n i►¢A Dark brown PEAT,.with some silt, - A A A A A n n fibrous to ainorphouse.,wet to Medium Stiff •- 7' 202:3 • ' A A a e saturated. 7.5 to 9 feet dark , , -- , ." , w , {�'�n ous with'silt et. A rJ.-..-1 n brown PEAT fibr , A n n A n'n.A r 10 to 11.5 feet"Dark brown.silty Soft — 10 -. .3, 171.6- - . i et, A e n PEAT,fibrous'.to amorphouse,wet. . - :E•"• Black SAND,medium-grained, 24 25,1 , Bentonite slurry - V• v ;'..,fats .saturated, 4 inch thick layer , ,, Dense Medium , ' • - • added to hole to ' " .k of brown, saturated, non- - , ' " control heave.. plastic silt.at 13 feet." • , " ` - •r %' Black-SAND,.as above.but'• - - , t without-silt layer arid•very dense. Very Dense 4 20 u ?`? > :` Black.SAND, as above. Very Dense: • 50+•_. , _ , SP: '• -25 . • • - " : )1;••' Black SAND, as above but ," - Dense , . _ j finer grained. 49.• ", 24.3 .<. -30 . f::•>:.,-,..Ti,4 Black SAND, medium grained,• - saturated, interbedded with 4 Medium Dense, T '29 . 36.0 •", `^: :.:<'•:.: inch thick layers"of-brown,soft; _ • . •: ,'e`;} -Y clayey silt. - .• _35 : $ ! >sEa•! ,Black.SAND "medium rained - {,., >`'°< .saturated. '° , • " 25.8 • • • . - . . • , . 4.. ' 1 -Medium Dense SM ," �T<: Dark gray silt SAND with'shells :;:i::::� I::::I>� g Y Y I , • fine grained,'satu'rated: - , Test boring terminated at 39 feet: ' , ' , ,. • • Groundwater encountered at 4.5 feet. •- • • . ,'Hole plugged with 3 bags'of bentonite chips mixed with.cuttings.. ` - - . • • • BORING LOG. FAR WEST .STEEL ,."-- �`��5�l ASSOCIATES 'RENTON;; WASHINGTON " ' -.•_. • Geotech'nical Consultants ' - ' ' - - ,Proj. .No. T-306,4 , -Date, 1/96., . ,: Fgure. A 2-- Boring No. B-2'. ' Logged by . KPR. •• ,Date: ',1/9/96 , : - ' : ' ;Approximate'•Elev. :12 . n. • •. N Water Graph/ Relative.' 'Depth 'USCS : ' Soil 'Description . O Blows .Content , . , p• Desity °(ft.j a (%)' ,r ,Brown SAND:with'few:gravel - , • . and'silt fill cuttings; medium-. - - - • . - ..= - '.. i:- grained,wet. - SPSM f,<< , FILL: .Brown SAND,witfi_few. : - f Dense - ` :;,;:: €'?€ gravel, medium-grained;.wet: - :33 12.3 � 1 i> I�I,�1 1 i�1' 1 1 C LL=60 i 1 i 1 1 1 i. Gray-brown,organic,clayey:SILT,', :J •iiiiiiii Medium Stiff. ' i I 1 low lasticit , saturated,•1 inch i i i.ii i i iP Y • . 8. • 64.0 PL=47 lift I I-l 1-111 thick peat•layer at 7.5 feet. - , • P.I=13' ' - I 1 i !`I 11 I i.� i-i •1 i Gray-brown organic SILT- • - Y1111',i 1 (as.above). • Medium Stiff• SP nt,'"• -.Black SAND with.silt,very'fine- _Medium,Dense.. • ' ,. - • . `grained; satu'rated.' ' - -; Test boring terminated at 9'feet: ' ' - . • ' Groundwater encountered at'4.5 feet. ' . ' ' 'i _ Hole plugged with 1 bag of bentonite chips,mixed•with,cuttings: •`` • _ .-, BORING LOG , TERRA , , . •'.: ,FARWES,T .STEEL 1 , >..; <>'��\N��; RENTON,':WASHINGTON .. ••, l AS-SO.C,IATES.' . - . - -• ' •rGeotechnical-Consultants - ' Pro No: :T-3064'=.:. i ur e` -3. • . - Date 1 96. F r :A • V ' •• Boring . No. B-3_ - - Lo ed b Y' , Date:. 1/10/96,: •• Approximate,, Elev. 12'` • Graph/ :o: .,(N) Water': .• _ '• `USES Soil 'Description ' Relative :Depth . .Blows/ Content " ' , . p Density; (ft.): foot - •(%) ''' ''7 Brown; medium grained'sand - ' Bentonite slurry i FILL cuttings with few gravel,- added to hole • .;?:,. wet. • to control heave , FILL: As above but saturated: Medium Dense• 18 16.9: isP T ``Y' »•�r'g:�'• .FILL:'�As above-but-grey: ' Loose ' Art:,• > ' ;< ,.. -- 1.s q:' ' • • 4 27.0 _ 1 i 1 i i 14 1 Dark brown organic SILT with peat III,I,I,i I fibers;low plasticity,moist to wet. • Soft • I I I 1 Gray-brown clayey SILT,-low plasticity i 1I i A.-.''saturated;5 inch thick layer of _ - , ' 'I'I I'I'i I i'I' fibrous peat at 8 feet;black,fine- 5. 69.1. PI_=64" Medium Stiff, , !i! ! !,,ib I,! grained,silty sand.in sampler tip. , '.PI=9 - ` : -10 " HADark gray, silty SAND,very • - , __. I `': SM s : fine to fine-grained, saturated: .Medium'Dense - •• • • ._ 19 33.7 {#v w>•E• %. ''Black�SAND,with.thin.interbeds.' $P• s.•. of dark gray silty SAND, fine ' Medium Dense - 17 " ' 33.2 - - ' ``• - ,i< to-medium-grained, saturated: : • ' _ -, • • —20: ' • - `-`•`•`'` `'"` Dark b'rown,gray silty SAND, Medium.Dense , ' SM >'s'`: very fine-grained, saturated. • , :, .k•r{;,.t,:y,, Black SAND,'fine to medium .• Medium,Dense • _ .grained, saturated: =25 SP •' - 1 b >. .' x" t' Black SAND, as above': -Dense . - . - • 36 24.6. Test boring terminated at•29 feet. ' -- Groundwater encountered at 1.5 feet:and 7‘feet. , • • ' , • • ' - , -Hole plugged.with 1 bag of bentonite'chips mixed.with cuttings.. . • - - ,. BORING • >< . . TERRA FARWEST,.STEEL.; >>>>' ��\��� • , RENTON, WASHINGTON ASSOCIATES . Geotechnical--Consultants • - -. -Prof.. No..- -T-3064. Date:1/96, Figure A4 :, - . • ' .. .Boring No. B=4-: - Logged by: KPR. - - • - . ' . .Date:" "1/10/.96. •• .- . . - Approximate Elev. .12 Grad, . (N) Water - p / , . Relative _ Depth Ea'. glows. Content USCS Soil..Description'• :'Dnsity . .(ft )- , ,: ft s' A ' Brown; medium-grained sand '- i Is:. FILL cuttings,wet. ;: • ,• - SPA.;,: FILL: Brown SAND; medium-• Medium Dense • ':•` f` grained; saturated:: - - - - 27 13:6; - , , i - ' , , : . 2_ i1,i!iii1,ii: :: •Gray-brown organic SILT, low = Medium Stiff eJ • L'L=7.0 i�i�.i�i�i�f�i�i. plasticity,wet, dark brown '6 , 60.8 ' PL=50 : ' iiis •OH iIli fibrous;wet peat,in sampler . , I -• - - - P1=20 . :, ' ����I�1i1l l i ti1111 .'.p. . i �,,, , ,�ii , , Medium Stiff ". 43.2 =<:i SM `•>I;;' .Dark.gray silty SAND;;very.fine Medium Dense' • `to fine-grained,-saturated.• / , - • • • , • BORING LOG >: TERRA ' °:FARWEST.STEEL . :-'-:. " . ASSOCIATES " RENTON,, WASHINGTON _ , Geotech'nical Consultants {- _ , - Proj.' No. T-3064• Date 1/96; Figure A-5. ; Boring N.o. 'B-5 ' ' L • ogged by:- KPR,. . - ' Date: 1%11/96 - Approximate'•Elev. 12 �. N . Water Graph/ - l , Relative Depth. E glows/ •Content • OSCS , • Soil Description Density, (ft.) -- foot • •(%) , - • •'>':: Gray sand FILL cuttings with ••• • _ "- , • 4.. ' 'few gravel;,medium-grained; :' Sp ' moist. - - •• :::::::::::::: i:: FILL:•Gray sand with silt and some Dense 30`: • 9.1 . Y:`:liUi gravel, medium:grained,.wet to 3.5 i -i :-»:4.; feet becoming-saturated.- - • - • - • - • , , iiirii.ii - 5 LL=78 i i 1 1 i i r Brown-gray organic SILT;with. . Stiff i-iiiiiiiiiiiiii 10 . 71.0_ PL= 4" •_ • i ,., i ,, peat fibers,."saturated,.low • 111.1 OH I1li plasticity: ' " _ PI=24 I i i rl I • ' 1 iI I1I1I1I1I 1I1 Gray clayey SlLT;;wet, low' - - • - ' ' LL=53 ' - lilill'ililI,' plasticitySoft - 69.1 PL=35 Dark gray silty'SAND;very fine - •" ' •PI=18 Loose- Bentonite slurry >_•,to fine-grained; saturated.- • . =•,,10. -'' - ' ' ' - _ added"to hole � to control heave Dark gray,silty SAND;as above.. Dense • • >•9f _ _ ':Black SAND,:fine-grained, } saturated.. 15 • _ ;: 'Black SAND, as above but with - : • . . 37 29.2• ' - sp. 1. occasional 1.inch thick silty Dense'" - `3 : very•fine=grained,sand layers.' ' ' '• •A.'. {; Black SAND'medium-grained, Very Dense — .' ` : '• saturated: ' - _ , • ,t1 III ..1„ ;'``�s .Black SAND with silt;fine , `, , • . grained, saturated; : i. SP SM' - Very Dense •• • • 52 25.5 • Page1of2 . BORING LOG ' .: >:::» •TERRA. : FARWEST STEEL: .;::::;<:. ,'4N RENTON,:.INASHINGTON - ` ASSOCIATES: Geotechnical Consultants , • ' • ' • " ' . Proj. No. T-3064 Date 1/96 :, Figure A 6, • • : . • Boring. No.' B-5 (Conti;nued) , . - Logged by: •KP,R : ' . • . - " Date: 1/11/96 - ' . , • • • Approximate Elev. 12 • Graph/ Q ' ...(N) ., Water;• Grail Soil_• Description Relative.° Depth. E Blows% :Content' . Density (.( .), ' .. .foot , .`(%a)- . • { Gray silty CLAY;'with trace / wood bits-and clam Shills, ; . - • low plasticity,,saturated. • Very Soft • - :PL=24'' • •`, • //CL P.1=21 Gray•silty CLAY,;with clam` i :. ' shells•.low saturated plasticity,' Very Soft '- 1: 48.2 C-0.142 . .with sand at 36:5_feet.• • • � Unit Wt:=107.3 . • Gray silty.SAND,:with clam ' - ' pcf ,* >•` shells, •medium grained, - :4 • - ' ' 25.8 '`'®'`? saturated. Loose _ •I. - . - ` . —. 40 Increased drilling . . resistance at • .• • "z..,:':4 • 40 feet '$;: - -1 • SP SM -Black SAND with some silt, .. - a' Dense 37 • 26:5 mediumg s•r med saturated • • -45• : ' , F :a _ . Dark gray'silty SAND/sandy . .. .. ' , , • ' 1 • • 'SILT•with shells,very fine- • , ''Medium Dense• - ', 4 , , grained,sand;saturated. 16 44.4 _ _50' , - • I. : SM 1 MI Dark gray:silty,SAND with occasional shells,very•fine-' • •' Medium Dense 11 35.4 - ' to fine-grained and bits of • - - • - • •, -wood; saturated: •—55, '- ' '• Dark:gray silty SAND,;as above.. Medium Dense - T ',• . . .. . ,. , . . ,. . . ,,,.. , , . ._ . . ,. . . Test boring:terminated•at 59 feet. • • • . • Groundwater'encountered at 3.5•feet: • ' i• Hole plugged'with 2 bags of bentonite_chips mixed with cuttings. • • ' • - • - Page 2.'of'2 • - BORING LOG. , ' _ - .. iigi!::;` :TERRfA ' -- A ',''FARWEST`STEEL , ", - "•:.nr<_.,;; : ��\�\N . • , 'RENTON,;WASHINGTON, , `... ASSOCIATES Geotechhical Consultants - - ' 1 ' ' ; •. • . `Proj. No. T-3064 Date 1/96', 'Figure A76, I .. , , Imo• _ ., ' BoringNo.,.,B-6 . 'Logged 'by KPR- .` .. - Dater 1/11/,96 • • Approximate Elev. 12; Graph/ •n. .:. (N) Water. • Relative Depth`. glows Content USCS Soil Description DensityAft.)-':"- �. / o T cn foot' (/o). •-• • s._ 'Brown;gray,gravelly medium- , . .• . • , . • -- grained'silty'sand FILL'cuttings, ` - - • • saturated: - SM FILL: Gray.SAND.with gravel, . • 'Dense'. - ' 32'-' , , 9:3 ' • _ .medium-grained,,wet: . . " , _ _ ,. 7.5 feet: . : __= FILL Gray,•SA'ND,,medium Loose 5 - .. ,LL=80 gained:saturated. ' • PL=34 Dark brown PEAT, amorphous,wet. Soft _ PI=46 l eo 1,77 ~1 I� Gray sandy.SILT,with clay;very,fine- " " , ' C�0.4F7 MH 'grained sand;saturated;medium''plastic. ; Soft ' • - , 3 58:2 Unit Wt.=94.3. .._.�.� :r _' . pcf ' =i. >?::,: 'Gray silty'SAND,:,very fine to _ Loose '. • Bentonite'Slurry -:;-•,::, :.:, fine-grained,.saturated. - ' —1U . "added to hole , • , <... . , - • to control,heave • ' :.•;..i::3::: : Dark gray_silty SAND,very fne'' . ' . ' . : - .,- . . . to'fine-grained,'saturated,grades :'Medium Dense., _ " ' •to.black sand in-sampler tip. 19 28.7 " .... ........ Black SAND,fine to coarse-, , ' . ' , _• rained .saturated.: Dense' • - - - - -33 , 21.5 ' • ' N> ' - - ` :c> Black SAND• ,'medium to coarse- ' Very Dense ' , : . - t -. ,' ` . •• ' • ' ' :' • • , ;%4::, grained: " , . A s" SP '�••:.>3 • 25 . ' ' ; • >kr. 'Black SAND, as above. Y - • • • , Page:1 of 2, : BORING LOG , '• : , . - . - �;--• TERRA • ., ,.FARWEST STEEL . , 1. :i:<>Mi::•L\ I ; RENTON, WASHINGTON :.`.... .. .ASSOCIATES - , - .' Geotechnical Consultants - ''' •- Proj. No. . T-3064 • Date' 1/96 Figure •A 7 . ' - , : - BoringN,o.;;,B-6 Continued Logged by: -KPR ; . = :11_'' 96 ' • • •• Approximate Elev:-12` Graph/ a (N) Water . . . -USCS' `Soil ;Description Relative Depth E.• -Blows/ Content •• - - . Density: - i- (ft.) a , :foot-- (%) , • ' k S : Blak SAND aabve.p : Very Dense i ' Dark gray silty SAND:With , - - • - - - - '•trace clam shells, fine to' ' ' : • ': '•medium rained'saturated: Loose 25.1 SM` - - ->40 '- , ' - Dark• ra' silt SAND `as above:- Ir .- Y Y I-. - - =w 58. 29:8 ` , I • n:;' �:x,: Dark gray.SAND-with silt,trace-, - _ ; : -i:- :Y SP-SM .clam'shells,very-fine,to:fine- .Very Dense:'• " - '.k' grained; saturated. _ • <=, . —45'` • - Dark gray silty_SAND',with'trace Loose - - bits,of wood-:clam'sheils and , .- - .. 10 '36.9 -f i .` clay;,very fine to fine-grained,, •' , • Medium Dense .` saturated . - —J0 • ' • • _ = Loose -'. . Dark ra sil SAND,'as:above.•, L, • •• . , , —55., - - i' • Dark-g raY,'sil SAND, as above. . 'Medium Dense `° j . .-- c 28 24.2 i'• .. ' ' Test b"oringterminated•at 59 feet. ' ' ' •- Groundwater encountered'at surface an'd;7 feet. • '., . - , - • . ' , ' Hole plugged'with''2 bags,of-bentonite chips mixed with'cuttiings.. ' I - - , Page 2'of 2` ;. BORING l_OG, .. :•_ ,.:. FARWEST.'STEEL' , «"''''``•'����1� . 'RENTON;:.•WASHINGTON' >`>:.. ASSOCIATES - _ ; i ,Geotechnical Consultants proj. No 'T-3064 Date 1/96 ,Figure A 7 . . • : SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER',ANALYSIS . - - , - . SIZE OF OPENING IN,INCHES ,' I NUMBER'OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD •_ - • GRAIN-SIZE IN MM .` '. . • • .- , N " - - •\\\\ \ C:) "O' -O O' O O( .4- .M " O.O O O 8- O c0 d- M N .- in(0 M .- d• - N sk Co N O O_O ,O .0 0 O; O,O .O .,O 100^ -, 90: .A 80 io - n .70. 30:.rT1 Z ai `y Z _ 40 -n _- 50 — = T_— 50. (I) u _ 70 _ •, 80 0 20 -,1:y 10 - . o. OD Z - _ - - Z �. 0 ., i i -. i i i _100'.' - - _ rrl—. - CD 'O O'O O. O O CD --•• :O CO CO •-sr M- C4 CO CO •, d- M .N ' O.CO -"d-" M- ,N O co co -a- O O C - :O- - - C.�N - M• . N_ - O 00_ CO. -d' M N, - - .. -O O- . O O O ...0 O -O O O_ O• : .. m. _ MILLIMETERS . , - . D GRAIN SIZE :IN .: __,,,=, _ • COARSE_ ' I -: FINE- COARSE I MEDIUM • . I ' - FINE n Z P1 D COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES rrl r. - . __ -Key'.: Boring. or Depth. . USCS. - - - Description Moisture. - LL PL Test` Pit (ft.) _ _ _ Content-(%) I-. •. B-1 2:5 :"SM silty SAND with gravel - . ' _ - oo.,. 0 B=1 . • 37.5 SM silty SAND _ .SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES 1 NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM ' f0 \sMF OlnO�-N 0M0 d' C) CO ` M N - � O 60 OOO OO ' O3 cO OO OO M imemiimmimmii +r - �_ . -- — —+_ 1ismonnimmi �® _ ea = - D 80 . ®® ��� .■ 20 ern ' 3• w-Z7 e® NIIENEI — — o O :U [Ti_ �� �s ® 70 c0 j C7 > -70 _. �= — — 30 rn.:D MENEENNIIII IMENNINEEMENIMINI=INEIENNIENIMINNENINI=MIENIMMEINNENNINEINE11=111EM- 60 H ,, -I ' i=1=MI® \IIOIIiIIIMMINIM— — rn 50 ®� — 50 co co �s 1 s=—®— -< 40 Tom, - - �_ 60 1 ra. - = 30: �� o�I EIMEEINNUNINININI 70 mmom� - Wo 20 =M imummaimimmommomI®s -INN 80 rn - =immimmi—moimur —I•VIr — — �. . =IM +I�sus o>Z �a !_��a- m :Z*. 0 El—�E.■ o ,=E - - r• - 100 _ m O- O, .O O O ' O,O- O O 00 tO "d• M. N - ..00 CD- _ at. M N co,co '.t re) 'CV CO .CO S N7 N Q • (''M M. N` 'ODO (D. •d• M N _ -,. O O- O O O O O O O O C .. ..- ti M . - GRAIN SIZE. IN MILLIMETERS_ �' _—i Z- :COARSE' I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM.' • I -FINE ` rrn COBBLES GRAVEL • SAND`. FINES O cn _ un Z Boring or Depth Moisture Key Test Pit (ft.) -USCS Description Content (%) LL P,L. ' .. I B-2 2.5 SP—SM SAND with-gravel and silt . 0 -B-2- 22.5 SP-SM SAND with some silt ''- ' '." :. . SIEVE . ANALYSIS . - , HYDROMETER: ANALYSIS- - . .- . . - SIZE OF OPENING IN.INCHES' I- .NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, 'U.S. STANDARD - • GRAIN SIZE IN-MM , - : . _ N \ .\\\\ \ - O . O ...O - .O. .O •- OID:„, 8 M N - - . _ O N CO- O O O d-' M =N Q;O O O O O_' _ • - i0 � ' 0 O' O O O O�O O" O O� O O 0 . 0 • �, D =1 80. " ' : . . _ .. 20. . _ _.Cn,rn rri rT, c : --/ -I -fi0 40.,c) o:,rn rn. 50 � , 50 �L7 m • .40_ . _ - 60 - . 30 70:_ _ c --- o: - 80 : ' ' ' 20 .+ rn _ 90 .D D 0 �. = - , •••, I•. , 1 , I', , ,-,:-, I. , .I ., , - .- ..(.I .i I ,.,. , I . , •- ' . •,:, , , `. - - 100 - rn:— _ . O O. -.-0 0 0:_ 0 O. 0- 0'00 c0.- 'd' M ;N `--,a0 'CD -4.'ill•'`CV �.00 c0.:'d- t� CV'..' '-0 00, t0 •• st M N•• •. `,. '0 -, C�rn _ .M ••_N ' OOO, co. -.t.M _.N. - '0 0 .. 0 0_ .0 _ 0 0 - 0-0 •_ `O,` , '� `, , 1 CD GRAIN• SIZE-I IN .MILLIMETERS. rn. (n D. ' • =-.zCOARSE--' I -.-'FINE' ` ` COARSE 1 ' MEDIUM_ . .1 • -FINE, •:.: • - rr i _:..'.GOBBLES -- GRAVEL . • SAND- FINES • ; _ • . , _ z. v . .- Boring or Depth Moisture'.- c T. ... Key. . Test'._Pit (ft.): U., _ - Description _. Content'(%). LL ; PL. I •.`•' - B-5 52.5 • SM-MI,' silty.SAND,: .- - - O B-6. 2.5 SM silty SAND with gravel SIEVE ANALYSIS- . HYDROMETER, ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD - GRAIN SIZE IN MM'- - N \\ \ •\. 0 O O O p p� . M. N O-O O"O O =C) CO 'd' M N •- II�- M" d' ' N" .d- S' N O O- O. O O O.O O O O O- 0 •% : 90 - . 10 > H ' : 80 n . 20. (n :ITI c)' (n. ,p . , - . - O 77 : . _ c�. (7 > n 70 30 m O _ _ - .. 0 60 40 n W ...� _ . y z ' P -50 _ — . " 50 (� rn x, 40 - 60 v m _ G7 30 70 m oz --r ' �. .. 0 20' 80 rn rn 10 o --IDz - : - r(�iI f—V O' ON ,. O O O O' 1rO) O _ O Co CO s F) V. -•OD Co d:_M _CV '7 O cO dO• � N q OOD 2OO ;.d M N C - - • • • ��m GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS • OOO _-Z COARSE • I FINE COARSE I , MEDIUM I FINE- - .z rm D . _ COBBLES GRAV�t : SAND FINES - G7 m r �r--< z Boring or , Depth . Moisture; ' _ Key Test Pit (ft.). USCS' Description Content (%) LL PC • B-6 ,37.5 SM' silty SAND : - 0 B-6 ' 52.5.' SM silty SAND - 1.10 • 0.85' , 1: 5 1 5 10 50` Pressure (tsf) • Boring Depth . �r ry, mey USCS Soil •Description C�_, Sqn en . % DeOnsi No. (ft.) - •' before After '(pcf)" • B-5 36:0 CL silty CLAY. :14' .005 .1.08 46.8` 38.0.n 70.3 C = Virgin Compression Index ' Ca = 'Coefficient of Secondary -Compression.•(at 0.83 tsf) e0 = .Inplace.Void Ratio • CONSOLIDATION TEST DATA s ifispe�\\\ TERRA:` FARWEST -STEEL R,ENTON, WASHINGTON ��� ASSOCIATES �','. Geotechnical. Consultants'" Pro'. 'No;3064 Date ' 1/96 Figure A--12 , 17 1.6 • j - .. r ` 1.5 _ • r Pressure.(tsf) Mpisiur Dry, ' Key " Boring Depth USCS Soil Description " Cc_ Ca ', eo C nten . % Density -No. (ft.). Before After (pcf) ® B-6 8.0 ' MH.,, , sandy SILT with clay .47 .0065 • 1.77 80.6 •63.4' 500 C�. = Virgin Compression Index_ Coefficient of Seconda Compression (at •0.83 tsf ace Void Ratio, In plan ?o P ' ' CONSOLIDATION: TEST 'DATA.t' TERRA" - , FARWEST STEEL , ���\ RENTON, - WASHINGTON � �� ASSOCIATES , �' ` Geotechnical. Consultants. Pi-oj; No.•3064 Date -1/96. . Figure A-13.: