The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES 4513CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 4513 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CURRENT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLANS FOR ISSAQUAH, KENT, AND RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICTS, AND CURRENT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FOR RENTON REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY; ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE "TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE UPDATE — INDUSTRIAL LAND USES" MEMORANDUM DATED SEPTEMBER 23, 2022; AND AMENDING THE 2023/2024 CITY OF RENTON FEE SCHEDULE. WHEREAS, on November 23, 2009, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 5509, which removed many fees from the Renton Municipal Code and consolidated them into the 2010 City of Renton Fee Schedule brochure, which has been subsequently amended; and WHEREAS, on November 14, 2022, the City Council passed Resolution No. 4484, adopting an amended fee schedule for 2023 and 2024; and WHEREAS, the fee schedule for 2023 and 2024 was subsequently amended by Resolution Nos. 4492 and 4501; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to approve an amended fee schedule to make periodic updates as part of the City's Mid -Biennial Budget amendment; and WHEREAS, under Renton Municipal Code ("RMC") Section 4-1-190 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Department Regulations), the City of Renton has heretofore collected school impact fees on behalf of the Issaquah, Kent, and Renton School Districts, and collected fire impact fees on behalf of the Renton Regional Fire Authority (RRFA); and WHEREAS, the Issaquah, Kent, and Renton School Districts, and Renton Regional Fire Authority (RRFA) each have requested that the City of Renton adopt the Districts' and RRFA's 1 RESOLUTION NO. 4513 current Capital Facilities Plans and adjust the school and fire impact fees as established in the Districts' Capital Facilities Plans and RRFA's Capital Facilities Plan; and WHEREAS, the City adopted impact fees for transportation, parks, and fire protection in 2011 based on extensive research reflected in the "Rate Study for Impact Fees for Transportation, Parks and Fire Protection," City of Renton, dated August 26, 2011, adopted by the City Council by Ordinance No. 5670 on October 8, 2012; and WHEREAS, the City adopted impact fees for transportation in 2016 based on research reflected in "Rate Study for Impact Fees for Transportation," City of Renton dated July 5, 2016, adopted by the City Council by Resolution No. 4299 on November 21, 2016; and WHEREAS, the City has again conducted extensive research measuring the impact of new growth and development on transportation public facilities and that research is reflected in a memorandum on the subject of "Transportation Impact Fee Update — Industrial Land Uses," City of Renton dated September 23, 2022; and WHEREAS, on October 2, 2023, the City Council passed Ordinance 6120 exempting early learning facilities, such as daycares, from eighty percent (80%) of the transportation impact fees, for consistency with State law; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the city's transportation impact fees to ensure greater compatibility with other local jurisdictions; and to exempt uses within the Center Downtown (CD) from 80% of the transportation impact fees for that use; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 2 RESOLUTION NO. 4513 SECTION I. The fee schedule is amended and replaced with the 2023-2024 City of Renton Fee Schedule brochure, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and adopted by this reference ("Fee Schedule"). An updated copy of the Fee Schedule shall at all times be filed with the City Clerk as required by Ordinance No. 5509. SECTION II. The City Council hereby adopts by reference as if fully set forth herein the following Capital Facilities Plans: A. The 2023 Capital Facilities Plan of Issaquah School District No. 411, dated June 2023, attached as Exhibit B; and B. The Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan 2022-2023 — 2028-2029, dated June 2023, attached as Exhibit C; and C. The 2023 Capital Facilities Plan of Renton School District No. 403, dated July 2023, attached as Exhibit D; and D. The Renton Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan, dated August 2023, attached as Exhibit E. SECTION III. The City Council of the City of Renton hereby adopts by reference as if fully set forth herein the memorandum regarding "Transportation Impact Fee Update — Industrial Land Uses," City of Renton dated September 23, 2022, as it amends the "Rate Study for Impact Fees for Transportation," City of Renton dated July 5, 2016, as it amends the "Rate Study for Impact Fees for Transportation, Parks and Fire Protection," City of Renton, dated August 26, 2011, as that study relates to Transportation, but reaffirming its adoption of the 2011 study as it relates to Parks and Fire Protection. The memorandum is attached hereto as Exhibit F. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 4513 SECTION IV. The amended Fee Schedule adopted by Section I of this resolution shall be effective on January 1, 2024 and thereafter act as the City of Renton's Fee Schedule for all fees or changes referenced therein. The Fee Schedule shall remain in effect until amended or otherwise replaced by the City Council. In the event the Fee Schedule is not amended prior to the year 2025, the fees specified for the year 2024 shall continue to apply into and beyond 2025 until amended by the City Council. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL the 20th day of November, 2023. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 20th day of November, 2023. Approved as to form: Shane Moloney, City Attorney RES-FI N:1955:10/31/23 4 RESOLUTION NO. 4513 EXHIBIT A 2023-2024 City of Renton Fee Schedule brochure City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023-2024 2023-2024 City of Renton Fee Schedulel I I� .....rnu cTY KAIe3c. Rev. July 2023 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023-2024 SECTION I. MISCELLANEOUS FEES SECTION II. MAPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE SECTION III. CITY CENTER PARKING FEES SECTION IV. AQUATIC FEES SECTION V. CARCO THEATER (REPEALED) SECTION VI. PARKS AND FACILITIES USE AND RENTAL SECTION VII. COMMUNITY CENTER PASS CARD & FEES SECTION VIII. AIRPORT CHARGES SECTION IX. ANIMAL LICENSES FEES* - RMC 5-4-2 SECTION X. BUSINESS LICENSES SECTION XI. ADULT ENTERTAINMENT LICENSES SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES Building Fees: Land Use Review Fees: Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: Technology Surcharge Fee Impact Fees: Miscellaneous Fees: SECTION XIII. FIRE DEPARMENT FIRE MARSHAL FEES (RFA) SECTION XIV. MONETARY PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR INFRACTIONS ISSUED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 7.80 RCW 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 8 10 14 14 15 15 16 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023-2024 a. Zoning maps - standard 11 x 17 $4 $4 b. Zoning maps - large 24 x36 $12 $12 C. Comprehensive Plan map - standard 11 x 17 $4 $4 d. Comprehensive Plan map - large 24 x 36 $12 $12 e. Precinct maps $5 $5 2. Plat: a. First page $2 $2 b. Each additional page $1 $1 3. Photocopies: a. Each 8.5" x 11" or 8.5" x 14" $0.15 $0.15 b. Each 11" x 17" $0.20 $0.20 C. Each 8.5" x 11" or 8.5" x 14" color $0.25 $0.25 4. Budget: a. City's Budget $10 $10 b. City's Budget to other municipality or quasi -municipal corporation or other nonprofit charitable or education organizatior N/C N/C 5. Audio or Video Recording Copies: a. Audio recording, each copy $2 $2 b. Video recording, each copy $2 $2 6. Regulations and Plans: a. Comprehensive Plan and Map $30 $30 b. Title IV, Development Regulations: (i) Text and Zoning Map $110 $110 (ii) Text only $100 $100 C. Individual Chapters of Development Regulations $10 $10 d. Renton Municipal Code (two volumes) $400 $400 e. Code Supplements, per year: (i) Titles I - III and VI - X $70 $70 (ii) Title IV $70 $70 7. Miscellaneous Services: a. Certification and Notary Fees - Clerk's Certificatior $10 $10 b. Notary Public Attestation or Acknowledgement or as $10 $10 otherwise provided for in RCW 42.28.090, per signature C. Hold Harmless Agreements and other similar documents $20 $20 not otherwise provided for d. Lamination of licenses, pictures $6 $6 e. Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Loan Program: (i) Application Fee $200 $200 (ii) Loan Origination Fee $150 or 0.25%of loan amount, $150 or 0.25%of loan amount, whichever is greater whichever is greater (III) Closing Costs (including any legal fees) 50%of total actual costs 50%of total actual costs 8. Miscellaneous Charges for Police Services: a. Police Reports per page $0.15 $0.15 b. Record Checks (Written Response) $5 $5 C. Photographs- Digital on CD $2 $2 d. Photographs - black&white or color- Cost of developing film Cost Cost e. Fingerprint Cards $5 $5 (i) Each additional card $1 $1 9. Charges for Fire Documents: a. Fire reports per page $0.15 $0.15 b. Fire investigative report on CD $2 $2 C. First copy - black & white or color - Cost of developing film Cost Cost d. Additional copy- black & white or color- Cost of developing film Cost Cost 10. Computer Listings: a. City of Renton new business list $10 $10 b. List of all business licenses $20 $20 C. Copies requested to be faxed, local number $3 $3 d. Copies requested to be faxed, long distance number (i) Multi -family: 2 units, Duplexes, & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)' $10 $10 (ii) Six (6) or more pages (ten (10) page limit) $20 $20 11. Utility Fee: a. Special Request Water Meter Reading $30 $30 b. Utility New Account Setup $25 $25 C. Utility Billing Account Transfer(tenant billing form) $5 $5 d. Water utility outstanding balance search requested by $25 $25 fax, messenger, or letter e Water turn off and turn on fee $60 $60 f Water utility shutoff list processing fee $60 $60 g Water delinquent late fee of 10% of past due charges but not less than fifty cent! 10% 10% h Water after hours service charge to turn on water after 3 p.m. (additional fee; $90 $90 i Tenant notification fee for impending shutoff of water per tenam $5 $5 j Petition filing fee for stormwater appeal from category determination and assessmem $75 $75 k Meter Accuracy Reading - For testing 3/4" through 2" meter $40 $40 1 Meter Accuracy Reading - For testing meters larger than 2" Time & Materials, requires Time & Materials, requires a $60 refundable deposit a $60 refundable deposit prior to test prior to test 12. Schedule of Fines for False Alarms - Security/Burglar: (effective February 1, 2019) a. One-time Registration Fee $25 $25 b. Annual Registration Renewal N/C N/C c. First False Alarm in a registration yea? N/C N/C d. Second False Alarm in a registration yea? $100 $100 e. Third or more False Alarm in a registration yea? $250 $250 f. Late Payment Fee $25 $25 g. Unregistered Alarm System Fee $50 $50 ' A registration year shall mean January 1 thru December 31 each year. 13. �SECTION NSF Check Fees 1. MISCELLANEOUS FEES' r) $25 2023 $25 2024 14. 16 Veteran Park Tile: Three lines $75 $75 15. Electronic Records""': City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023-2024 a. Photocopies or printed copies of electronic records, per page $0.15 $0.15 b. Scanning paper records, per page $0.10 $0.10 C. Electronic files or attachments uploaded for electronic delivery (email, cloud -based data storage service, or other means of electronic $0.05 $0.05 delivery), for each four (4) files d. $0.10 $0.10 Transmission of records in an electronic format or for the use of agency equipment to send the records electronically, per gigabyte (GB) e. Body worn camera footage redaction, per minute of documented staff time, plus other documented costs of redactior $0.64 $0.64 ' The charges identified in RCW 42.56.120(3)(b) (and referenced above) may be combined to the extent that more than one type of charge applies to copies produced in response to a particular request. The actual cost of any digital storage media or device provided by the agency. Alternatively, the City may charge a flat fee of up to $2 for the entire request as long as the cost of uploading and transmitting the electronic records is reasonably estimated to equal or exceed that amount. Only one $2 flat fee per request is authorized for electronic records produced in installments. When records are provided electronically on a CD, DVD, thumb drive, flash drive, or other electronic device, the requestor will be charged for the cost of the electronic storage device. The City may charge an actual -cost service charge for requests that require use of IT expertise to prepare data compilations or provide customized electronic access services when not used by the City for other purposes. A cost estimate and explanation will be provided to the requestor before „rn o tho ctc ' Option to waive charges. The City may waive charges associated with fulfilling a request. The decision will be based on various factors, including the volume and format of the responsive documents. The decision to assess fees for fulfilling a public records request shall be made on a consistent and equitable basis, dependent primarily upon the amount of staff time required for copying, scanning, shipping, unloadine. and/or transmittine the records associated with fulfilline a reauest. a Certified copies. If the requestor is seeking a certified copy of a City record, an additional charge of $1.00 per each complete document may be applied to cover the additional expense and time required for certification- 16. Document Recording Fees: a. The applicant shall pay all document recording fees charged by King county and all administrative fees charged by the title company for Actual Costs Actual Costs processing. Payment in full shall by submitted to the City before documents are sent for recording b. Miscellaneous charges associated with document recording, such as courier fees Actual Costs Actual Costs 17. Publication Fees: The applicant shall pay all Publication fees charged by publication outlet used by the City (The Seattle Times or equivalent). Payment in full shall Actual Costs Actual Costs be made to the City prior to public hearing, permit approval or issuance, whichever comes first ' Should Section I fees due total less than $4.00 and no other fee is due to the City at the same time, the department administrator may authorize to waive the entire amount due at their discretion. 2023 2024 1. Green Fees*: a. Weekday: (i) 18 Hole $43 $43 (ii) 9 Hole $32 $32 (iii) 18 Hole, Senior $34 $34 (iv) 9 Hole, Senior $26 $26 (v) 18 Hole, Junior $25 $26 (vi) 9Hole, Junior $19 $20 b. Weekend: (i) 18 Hole $50 $50 (ii) 9 Hole $32 $35 For purposes of this section, "weekend" shall mean Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. "Weekday" shall mean the remaining four days of the week. "Junior" shall mean ages 17 and under, "Senior" shall mean ages 62 and over. Off-season and promotional rates determined by management; posted on website. 2. Club Rental : b. Premium $60 $65 3. Golf Cart Fees': a. 18 Hole $36 $38 b. 18 Hole Single Rider $28 $28 C. 9 Hole $24 $26 d. 9 Hole Single Rider $18 $18 e. Trail Fee $15 $15 f. Half Cart, 18 Hole $18 $19 g. Half Cart, 9 Hole $12 $13 4. Driving Range Fees': a. Large Bucket $13 $14 b. Small Bucket $10 $11 C. Warm-up Bucket $6 $7 S. Lesson Fees: a. 1/2 Hour Private S55 560 b. 1 Hour Private $80 $90 C. 1/2 Hour Series Private $200 $220 d. 1 Hour Series Private $300 $330 e. Group Series $140 $160 If. 1/2 Hour Private, Junior $35 $40 g. Playing Lesson(3-hole minimum/9-hole maximum) per hole $25 $30 2023 2024 1. City Center Parking Garage Fees: Parking rates for retail parking will be as follows: a. Zero (0) -two (2) hours N/C N/C b. Two (2) - four (4) hours $2 $2 C. Four (4) - six (6) hours $4 $4 d. Six (6) - (10) hours $6 $6 e. 10 hours or more $10 $10 If. Monthly pass -holders, tax included $35 $35 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023-2024 1. Admission for the Aquatic Center shall be as follows: a. Regular Session: (i) Infants - under 1year N/C N/C (ii) Youth - 1 to 4 years $8 $8 (iii) Ages 5 and up $16 $16 (iv) Lap swim - water walking only $5 $7 (v) Locker Rental $0.25 $0.25 b. Canopy Rental Fees': (includes canopy and admission for one leisure swim session): (i) Henry Moses Party Tent 41 (10' x 20' for up to twenty-five (25) guests on wave pool): (1) Resident Rate, per session $600 $600 (2) Non-resident Rate, per session $700 $700 (ii) Henry Moses Party Tent fit (10' x 20' for up to twenty-five (25) guests): (1) Resident Rate $500 $500 (2) Non -Resident Rate $600 $600 (iii) Henry Moses Party Tent#3 (10' x 10' for up to ten (10) guests): (1) Resident Rate, per session $250 $250 (2) Non-resident Rate, per session $300 $300 C. Resident Rate all inclusive' $3,800 $3,800 d. Non-resident Rate all inclusive' $4,800 $4,800 e. Swim Lesson Program: Fees and associated descriptions are published in the "Let's Go Renton" Renton Activities Guide f. End -of -year School Party Rentals: (i) Renton School District (1) 001-299students $1,900 $1,900 (2) 300-399students $2,250 $2,250 (3) 400 - 499 students $2,400 $2,400 (4) 500 - 599 students $2,550 $2,550 (ii) Other Schools and Districts (1) 001-299students $2,450 $2,450 (2) 300-399students $2,850 $2,850 (3) 400-499students $3,150 $3,150 (4) 500 - 599 students $3,360 $3,360 ' Sales tax not included in the rental fee 2. Boat Launch Rates: a. Daily resident - 7 days a week $20 $20 b. Daily Non-resident- 7 days a week $25 $25 C. Overnight resident - 7 days a week $25 $25 d. Overnight Non-resident- 7 days a week $45 $45 e. Annual parking boat launch permit - resident $70 $70 f. Annual parking boat launch permit - non-resident $130 $130 g. Fishing Tournaments at Coulon Beach (additional rental fee if using the Pavilion area for weigh in and or electricity at the current rental rate) per event (i) Resident rate $110 $110 b. Non-resident 10am-7pm $290 $290 2. Gene Coulon Beach Park Shelters (South #1, South fit and Creekside) Maximum of 75 people: a. Resident 10am-7pm b. Non-resident 10am-7pm e. South Shelters 1 & 2 Resident rate f. South Shelters 1 & 2 Non-resident rate $150 $290 $310 $610 $150 $290 $310 $610 3. Gene Coulon Beach Park Shelters (North Shelter): a. Resident 10am-7pm b. Non-resident 10am-7pm $200 $360 $200 $360 4. Basketball court rate per hour (Tournament Play Only): a. Resident rate b. Nan -resident rate $25 $30 $25 $30 S. Open Space Area in the Parks (Cascade, TeaS a e, Phillip Arnold, Cedar River, Ear ington, Gene Coulon, Glencoe, Kenny a e Lions, Sunset, an Riverview Parks): a. Resident rate per hour b. Non-resident rate per hour C. Temporary Event Permit Fee $25 $30 $85 $25 $30 $85 6. Piazza Park Open Space Event Rental a. Full day rental 10am-7pm $500 $500 7. Photo Shoots per hour: a. Commercial Film and Photo Shoots per hour $300 $300 8. Electrical Spider Box rental: a. Electrical spider box rental per box, per event, with special event approval $200 $200 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023-2024 9. Athletic Field Rental, Lights and Prep Fees: a. Sports field rental per hour - resident $30 $30 b. Sports field rental per hour - non-resident $36 $36 C. Renton Area Youth Sports Agencies, per hour $8 $8 d. Field prep for softball/baseball - resident per occurrence $35 $35 e. Field prep for soccer- resident per occurrence $50 $50 f. Custom Field prep - resident per occurrence $100 $100 g. Field prep for softball/baseball - non-resident per occurrence $35 $40 h. Field prep for soccer - non-resident per occurrence $50 $55 i. Custom Field prep - non-resident per occurrence $100 $100 j. Field lights all sports - resident per hour $30 $30 k. Field lights all sports - non-resident per hour $36 $36 10. Banquet & Classroom Rental - Community Center & Senior Activity Center: a. Friday evening 5 hour minimum - resident $750 $750 b. Weekend Rates 10 hour minimum - resident $1,500 $1,500 C. Extra hours - per hour - resident $150 $150 d. Friday 5 hour minimum - non-resident $900 $900 e. Weekend Rates 10 hour minimum - non-resident $1,800 $1,800 f. Extra hours - per hour- non-resident $180 $180 g Banquet Room - Mon - Fri - daytime - resident/hr 3 hour min $100 $100 h Banquet Room - Mon - Fri - daytime -non-resident/hr3 hour min $90 $120 i. Damage deposit $550 $550 j Cancellation Fee - Less than 90 days $550 $550 11. Classroom and Gymnasium Rental - Renton Community Center: a. Resident single gym athletic - per hour $50 $50 b. Non-resident single gym athletic - per hour $60 $60 C. Resident double gym athletic- per hour $100 $100 d. Non-resident double gym athletic - per hour $120 $120 e. Resident single gym non -athletic $1,000 $1,000 f. Non-resident single gym non -athletic $1,200 $1,200 g. Resident double gym non -athletic $2,000 $2,000 h. Non-resident double gym non -athletic $2,400 $2,400 i. Carpet fee single gym - resident&non-resident $325 $325 j. Carpet fee double gym - resident&non-resident $650 $650 k. Classroom resident $40 $40 I. Classroom Non-resident $48 $48 12. Facility Rental - Neighborhood Center: a. Meeting room - resident $35 $40 b. Gymnasium - resident $35 $40 C. Meeting room - non-resident $40 $48 d. Gymnasium - non-resident $40 $48 13. Farmer's Market a. 10x10 Lot $40 $40 b. Half Lot $20 $20 C. Application fee $30 $30 d. Electrical fee $5 $5 14. Parklet Rentals a. Parklet Rental including Installation per Occurrence $500 $500 Long -Term Right of Way Permit will be required if located within the City Right of Way. See Section XII, Development Fees, of the City of Renton Fee Schedule Brochure: Subsection a of subsection 3, Site Work, 15. Outlying Park Buildings (Tiffany Park Building, Kennydale Park Building, Teasdale Park Building; a. 6-hour block - resident b. 6-hour block - non-resident C. Deposit resident & non-resident d. Non-profit fee - per hour (no deposit required) $200 $240 $250 $40 $200 $240 $250 $40 • • • •LUU__ Fees and associated descriptions are published and available in the "Let's Go Renton" Recreation Guide. ISECTION Vill. AIRPORTr2024 2023 2024 1. Airport Fuel Flow Charge: per gallon $0.08 $0.08 2. JetA Fuel Flow Charge: per gallon $0.10 $0.10 4.3. T-Hangar Waitlist waiFkst, one time fee $100 $100 7.4. T-Hangar, Neff. ` '-Move-in Fee (non-refundable) $250 $250 5 T-Hangar Rental Space (monthly) (plus leasehold excise tax) $409.43 $409.43 b.6. Tie -down Waitlist wai 4ist, one time fee $25 $25 7 Tie -down Rental Space (monthly) (plus leasehold excise tax) $106.43 $106.43 B. Penalty for violation of Minimum Standards/Airport Rules & Regulations (each occurrence) $500 $500 9. Penalty for Movement Area Incursions (each occurrence), assessed to sponsor/tenant $500 $500 6. 10. Lost gate card fee per occurrence $50 $50 3.12. Transient airplane Parking (daily) 58 58 License 3. Economically Qualified Resident Special Lifetime License $0 $0 4. Duplicate Tag $10 $10 ' Please note. impounded animals are subject to license fees. microchipoine costs, and other out-of-pocket costs as specified in RMC 6-6-2. City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023-2024 1. General Business License: a. Registration Fee b. Appeal of Business License Decision 2. Penalties: a. The penalty to reinstate an expired business license $50 $50 b. The penalty for failure to obtain a business license $250 $250 C. Failure to pay the license fee within one day after the day on which it is due and payable pursuant to subsection C7 of Chapter 5 of the RMC shall render the business enterprise subject to a penalty of (5%) of the amount of the license fee for the first month of the delinquency and an additional penalty of (5%) for each succeeding month of delinquency, but not exceeding a total penalty of (15%) of the amount of such 5%-15% 5%-15% license fee. ISECTION XI. ADULT ENTERTAINMENT LICENSES 2023 2024 1. Everyperson applying for a adult entertainment license shall pay the applicable nonrefundable application fee: a. Adult Entertainment Business License $750 $750 b. Entertainer $75 $75 C. Manager $75 $75 d. License Replacement $10 $10 2. Penalties: a. Civil Penalty, per violation $1,000 $1,000 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023-2024 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES 1. Building Fees: a• Building and Demolition Permit Fees' (i) Base Fee/Valuation $1.00 to $500.00 $42 $42 (ii) Valuation $501.00to$2,000.00 $42 + $4.70 x each $42 + $4.70 x each $100value $100value (iii) Valuation $2001.00to25,000.00 $112.57 + $21.63 x each $112.57 + $21.63 x each $1,000 value $1,000 value (iv) Valuation $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $610.06+ $15.57 x each $610.06+ $15.57 x each $1,000 value $1,000 value (v) Valuation $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $999.31 + $10.85 x each $999.31 + $10.85 x each $1,000 value $1,000 value (vi) Valuation $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1,541.81 + $8.63 x each $1,541.81 + $8.63 x each $1,000 value $1,000 value (vii) Valuation $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $4,993.81 + $7.33 x each $4,993.81 + $7.33 x each $1,000 value $1,000 value (viii) Valuation $1,000,001.00and up $8,659.81 + $5.66 x each $8,659.81 + $5.66 x each $1,000 value $1,000 value ' This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). b• Combination Building Permit Fee51,2 (i) Plumbing up to 3,000 sq ft $317 $317 (ii) Plumbing over 3,000 sq ft $348 $348 (iii) Mechanical up to 3,000 sq ft $254 $254 (iv) Mechanical over 3,000 sq ft $285 $285 (v) Electrical up to 3,000 sq ft $285 $285 (vi) Electrical over 3,000 sq ft $348 $348 1 This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units 1ADU). 2Combination Building Permit fees are required for each new single family residential structure. Building Plan Check Feel (i) Initial Building Plan Check Feet 65%of permit fee 65%of permit fee (ii) Additional Building Plan Check Fee 50%of initial plan Check Fee 50%of initial plan Check ' This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units 1ADU). 2 Building Plan Check Fee is in addition to the building permit fees, demolition permit fees, and combination building permit fees. The plan check fee is equal to 65% of the building permit fee. or the demolition permit fee, or the combination building permit fee. Includes three (3) review cycles. d. State Building Code Fee: (i) Non-residential projects $25 $25 (ii) Residential projects: (1) Base Residential Fee $6.50 $6.50 (2) Each additional unit after first unil $2 $2 e• Electrical Permit FeeS2: (i) Residential Fees - Single -Family and Duplex (1) New Service- Single Family and Duplex' (a) Up to 200 AMP $269 $269 (b) Over200 AMP $285 $285 (2) Service Changes/New Circuits - Single Family and Duplex: (a) Change up to 200 AMP $209 $209 (b) Change over 200 AMP $221 $221 (c) Any new circuits added to above price is per each up to a maximum of $80.00 $26 $26 (d) Minimum fee for remodel/addition of new circuits without a service charge $209 $209 (e) Cooling system circuit for new or replaced appliance $93 $93 (ii) Multi -Family, Commercial and Industrial Fees: Fees based on value of work. (1) $1.00 to $500.00 $82 $82 (2) $500.01 to $1,000.00 $82 + 4.89% ofvalue $82 + 4.89% ofvalue (3) $1,000.01 to 5,000.00 $106.45 + 4.93% of value $106.45 + 4.93% of value Mull $5,000.O1to$50,000.00 $303.78 + 2.58% of value $303.78 + 2.58% of value (5) $50,000.01 to $250,000.00 $1,463.10+ 1.70%of value $1,463.10 + 1.70% of value (6) $250,000.01 to $1,000,000.00 $4,870.92 + 1.45% of value $4,870.92 + 1.45% of value (7) $1,000,0OO.O1andup $15,775.97+0.53%ofvalue $15,775.97+0.53%ofvalue (iii) Temporary Electrical Services $209 $209 (iv) Miscellaneous Electrical Fees (1) Job Trailers $209 $209 (2) Signs per each $209 $209 (3) Mobile Homes $209 $209 (4) Low Voltage Work (e.g., alarm systems; thermostats; computer, data, or phone lines; fiber optics, cable 50%of commercial fees 50% of commercial fees television, etc.) Minimum $209 Minimum $209 (5) Residential Photovoltaic (PV) Solar Panel (a) Review Fee $135 $135 (b) Permit fee $209 $209 ' This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units 1ADU). 2 Exemption: Residential telephone communication systems, thermostats, security systems, and cable television installations are exempt from fees f• House Moving' - minimum per hour Inspection Fee: $190 $190 ' This covers only the Building Section inspection of the structure prior to move. There is a separate additional fee charged by the Public Works Department to cover the actual house move oermit. A building oermit is also required in order to site the structure on the new site. g. Inspection Fee For Condominium Conversions $190 on 1st unit / $24 each $190 on 1st unit / $24 each add'I unit add'I unit City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023-2024 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINU 1. Building Fees: (Continued) h• Manufactured/Mobile Home Installation Fees': (i) Within a manufactured home park $190 $190 (i1) Outside of a manufactured home park Building Permit Fees Building Permit Fees ' Includes plan review and inspection fees for the foundation (electrical, plumbing, mechanical, sewer and water connection fees are in addition to the below amounts). I. Mechanical Permit Fees:' (i) Residential - Mechanical Permit base fee plus itemized fees below: $65 $65 (1) Heating system (furnace, heat pump, suspended heater, fireplace, wood stove, etc.). A/C system (air $26 $26 conditioner, chiller or Air Handling Unit (VAV) including ducts and vents (2) Boiler or Compressor $26 $26 (3) Appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for $26 $26 which no other fee is listed in this code (4) Ventilation/exhaust fan $26 $26 (5) Fuel Gas Piping (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets $26 $26 (ii) Commercial or Multi -Family - Mechanical Permit base fee plus itemized fees below: $96 $96 (1) Heating system (furnace, heat pump, suspended heater, fireplace, wood stove, etc.). A/C system (air $45 $45 conditioner, chiller or Air Handling Unit (VAV) including ducts and vents (2) Boiler or Compressor $96 $96 (3) Refrigeration System $96 $96 (4) Commercial Hood: Installation of each served by a mechanical exhaust, including the ducts for such hood each $96 $96 (5) Incinerator: Installation or relocation of each $127 $127 (6) Appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for $45 $45 which no other fee is listed in this code (7) Fuel Gas Piping (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets, $45 $45 ' This fee shall be 50 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). 1• Plumbing Permit Fees:' (i) Residential - Plumbing Permit base fee plus itemized fees below $65 $65 (1) Per plumbing fixture (e.g., sink, shower, toilet, dishwasher, tub, etc.) or set of fixtures on one trap $12 $12 (2) Water Service: For meter to house $12 $12 (3) Per fixture for repair or alteration of drainage or vent pipin€ $12 $12 (4) Per drain for rainwater systems $12 $12 (5) Per lawn sprinkler system, includes backflow prevention $12 $12 (6) Per vacuum breaker or backflow protection device on tanks, vats, etc. $12 $12 (7) Per interceptor for industrial waste pretreatment $12 $12 (8) Fuel Gas Piping: (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets. $26 $26 (ii) Commercial or Multi -Family: Plumbing Permit base fee plus itemized fees below $96 $96 (1) Per plumbing fixture (e.g., sink, shower, toilet, dishwasher, tub, etc.) or set of fixtures on one trap $19 $19 (2) Water Service: For meter to building $19 $19 (3) Per fixture for repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping $19 $19 (4) Per drain for rainwater systems $19 $19 (5) Per lawn sprinkler system, includes backflow prevention $19 $19 (6) Per vacuum breaker or backflow protection device on tanks, vats, etc. $19 $19 (7) Per interceptor for industrial waste pretreatment $19 $19 (8) Fuel Gas Piping: (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets) $33 $33 (9) Medical Gas Piping: (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets) $96 $96 ' This fee shall be 50 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). k. Sign Permit Fees: (i) Permanent Signs: (1) Roof, projecting, awning, canopy, marquee, and wall signs $317 $317 (2) Freestanding ground and pole signs $317 $317 (11) Temporary and Portable Signs: (1) Real Estate Directional Signs, pursuant to RMC 4-4-10012, permit valid for a 12-months period $96 $96 (2) Grand Opening Event Signs, pursuant to RMC 4-4-10016d(i) $96 $96 (3) Event Signs, pursuant to RMC 4-4-10016d(ii) and (iii) per sign, per promotion $63 $63 (4) A -Frame Signs, pursuant to RMC 4-4-10015 Charge is for the first sign, all subsequent signs are $50.00 $158 $158 (5) Commercial Property Real Estate Banner each sign permit is valid for 12 months. $96 $96 (6) Decorative Flags fee is per entrance and valid until flag(s) are removed $96 $96 1. Miscellaneous Fees: (i) Inspection Fees: (1) Minimum Housing Inspection $158 $158 (2) WABO -Adult Family Home; Misc building inspection $158 $158 (3) Reinspection Fee; Misc building inspection $158 $158 (4) After hours inspection $175/hr $175/hr (ii) Plan Review Fees: (1) Electrical, Plumbing, or Mechanical Permits (percentage of permit fee) 40% 40% (2) Additional Plan Review Fees: Over three review cycles (percentage of plan review fee) 50% 50% (3) Miscellaneous Plan Review: hourly fee. $158/hr $158/hr (4) Site Plan/Zoning Review' S%of Permit Fee 5%of Permit Fee (5) Engineering Review' S%of Permit Fee 5%of Permit Fee pi) Work commencing before permit Issuance: Where work for which the permit is required is started prior to obtaining 2 X Permit Fee 2 X Permit Fee the permit, a special investigation fee in an amount equal to twice the permit fee shall be charged. The special investigation fee shall be paid in addition to the required permit fees ' This fee shall be 50 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). z Applies to inspection performed on Saturdays, Sundays, observed City of Renton holidays, and non -holiday Monday -Fridays outside the hours of 7:OOAM to 3:30PM City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023-2024 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (C•\ / 1 1 2. Land Use Review Fees: General Land Use Review': (i) Additional Animals Permit $56 $56 (ii) Address Change $120 $120 (iii) Annexation: (1) Less than 10 acres $5,900 $5,900 (2) 10 acres or more $5,900 $5,900 (iv) Appeal of: (1) Hearing Examiner's Decision $560 $560 (2) Administrative Decision $560 $560 (3) Environmental Decision $560 $560 (v) Binding Site Plan'«^«pFe!iFAqnaFyes` $5,93 $5,930 (1) Preliminary $2,965 $2,965 (2) Final $5,930 $5,930 (vi) Code Text Amendment (vii) Comprehensive Plan Map or Text Amendment (each) $5,900 $5,900 (vill) Conditional Use Permit: (1) HEX $3,710 $3,710 (2) Administrative $1,800 $1,800 (3) Revision (minor, administrative) 50% of Application Fee 50% of Application Fee (4) Revision (major) Application Fee Application Fee (ix) Critical Areas Exemption N/C N/C (x) Critical Areas Permit $1,410 $1,410 (xi) Critical Areas Review Fee: for those projects that propose impacts to critical areas and will be billed at the cost of 100%of contract cost 100%of contract cost contract biologist's review. (xii) Development Agreement $11,240 $11,240 (xiii) Environmental Impact Statement Cost include the coordination, review and appeal. Draft and Final' 100%of cost 100%of cost (xiv) Environmental Checklist Review $1,800 $1,800 (xv) Environmental (SEPA) Addendum $1,800 $1,800 (xvi) Fence Permit (special) $180 $180 (xvii) Grading and Filling Permit (Hearing Examiner) $6,080 $6,080 (xviii) Landscape Review Fee $180 $180 (xix) Legal Lot Segregation N/C N/C (xx) Lot Consolidation $570 $570 (xxi) Lot Line Adjustment $1,230 $1,230 (xxii) Manufactured/Mobile Home Park: (1) Tentative $1,230 $1,230 (2) Preliminary $3,650 $3,650 (3) Final $1,800 $1,800 (xxiii) Open Space Classification Request $170 $170 (xxiv) Plats: (1) Preliminary Short Plat $6,080 $6,080 (2) Final Short Plat $3,040 $3,040 (3) Preliminary Plat $12,170 $12,170 (4) Final Plat $6,080 $6,080 (5) Minor PlatAmendment 50% of Application Fee 50% of Application Fee (6) Major Plat Amendment Application Fee Application Fee (xxv) Planned Urban Development: (1) Preliminary Plan $6,080 $6,080 (2) Final Plan $3,030 $3,030 (xxvi) Reasonable Use Exception: (1) In conjunction with land use permit $570 $570 (2) Stand alone $1,730 $1,730 (xxvii) Public Arts Exemption N/C N/C (xxviii) Rezone $5,900 $5,900 (xxix) Routine Vegetation Management Permit without Critical Areas $120 $120 (xxx) Shoreline -Related Permits: (1) Shoreline Permit Exemption N/C N/C (2) Substantial Development Permit $3,030 $3,030 Mull Conditional Use Permit $3,650 $3,650 (4) Variance $3,650 $3,650 (xxxi) Site Development Plan (Site Plan or Master Plan which includes design review fee for projects subject to RMC 4-3-100): (1) Hearing Examiner Review $4,270 $4,270 (2) Administrative Review $3,030 $3,030 (3) Modification (minor, administrative) 50% of Application Fee 50% of Application Fee (4) Modification (major) required new application and repayment of fee required Application Fees Application Fees (xxxii) Small Cell Permit, per site $570 $570 (xxxiii) Special Permit (Hearing Examiner) $3,030 $3,030 (xxxiv) Street Naming (Honorary) (1) Application $280 $280 (2) Installation $280 $280 (xxxv) Temporary Use Permits: (1) Tier 1 $120 $120 (2) Tier 2 $230 $230 (xxxvi) Variance (per each variance requested) Administrative or Hearing Examiner $1,490 $1,490 (xxxvii) Waiver or Modification of Code Requirements cost is per request $290 $290 (xxxviii) Zoning Compliance Letter $540 $540 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023-2024 2. Land Use Review Fees: (Continued) a. General Land Use Review': (Continued) ' Exception for Projects Vested in the County: For those projects that have vested to a land use permit under the development regulations of King County, the King County Land Use Review Fee Schedule shall apply. and is herebv adopted by reference. A copv of that fee schedule has been filed with the Citv Clerk and is available at the Citv Clerk's office for public review. z Per RMC 4-3-050F7, the City may charge and collect fees from any applicant to cover costs incurred by the City in review of plans, studies, monitoring reports and other documents related to evaluation of impacts to or hazards from critical areas and subsequent code -required monitoring. 3 When the City is the lead agency for a proposal requiring an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) determines that the EIS shall be prepared, the City may charge and collect a reasonable fee from any applicant to cover costs incurred by the City in preparing the EIS. The ERC shall advise the applicant(s) of the projected costs for the EIS prior to actual preparation; the applicant shall post bond or otherwise ensure payment of such costs. The ERC may determine that the City will contract directly with a consultant for preparation of an EIS, or a portion of the EIS, and may bill such costs and expenses directly to the applicant. Such consultants shall be selected by mutual agreement of the City and applicant after a call for proposals. If a proposal is modified so that an EIS is no longer required, the ERC shall refund any fees collected under this subsection which remain after incurred costs are paid. The City may collect a reasonable fee from an applicant to cover the cost of meeting the public notice requirements of this Title relating to the applicant's proposal. The City shall not collect a fee for performing its duties as a consulted agency. The City may charge any person for copies of any document prepared under this Title, and for mailing the document, in a manner provided by chanter 42.17 RCW. " Prior to issuance of a small cell permit, the applicant shall pay the actual administrative expenses incurred by the City that are directly related to the City's review of the application, including plan inspection, and approval, as authorized by RCW 35.21.860(1)(b), as may be amended. b. Miscellaneous Fees': (i) Permit review staff overtime (applies only if permit review is requested by the applicant to be performed on $175/hr $175/hr Saturdays, Sundays, observed City of Renton holidays, and non -holiday Monday -Fridays outside of the hours of city staff regular work schedule) 1 Exception for Projects Vested in the County: For those projects that have vested to a land use permit under the development regulations of King County, the King County Land Use Review Fee Schedule shall aooly. and is herebv adopted by reference. A copv of that fee schedule has been filed with the Citv Clerk and is available at the Citv Clerk's office for public review. City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023-2024 3. Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: a. Site Work and Civil Construction Fees: (i) Clearin , Grading, Excavation, and MiniPermits and License Fees: Fees shall be based on the highest tier Tier Grade and Fill Quantity Cleared or Disturbed Area New or Replaced Hard Surface 0 < 50 cy < 7,000 sf < 2,000 sf 1 50c -499 cy 7,000 sf-<3/4 acre 2,000 sf-4,999 sf 2 500c- 4,999 cy 3/4 ac-<1 ac 5,000 sf-<1 ac 3 5,000c- 49,999 cy lac-<2.5 ac 1ac-<2.5 ac 4 50,000cy - 99,999 cy 2.5 ac-<5 ac 2.5 ac-<5 ac 5 100,000 cy and larger 5 ac and larger 5 ac and larger (1) Review/Intake Fee: (a) Tier 0(no permit required) N/A N/A (b) Tier 1 $520 $520 (c) Tier 2 $700 $700 (d) Tier $1,050 $1,050 (f) Tier $1,400 $1,400 (e) Tier $1,750 $1,750 (2) Inspection/Issuance Fee: (a) Tier 0(no permit required) N/A N/A (b) Tier 1 $500 $500 (c) Tier $1,000 $1,000 (d) Tier $1,330 $1,330 (f) Tier $2,660 $2,660 (e) Tier $3,990 $3,990 (3) Solid Waste Fills Review Fee': 1.5 x Review/Intake Fee 1.5 x Review/Intake Fee (4) Annual Licenses of Solid Waste Fills Review Fee''': 1.5 x Review/Intake Fee 1.5 x Review/Intake Fee (ii) Civil construction Dian review and inspection fees"'": (1) $150,000.00 or less 6%of cost 6%of cost (2) Over$150,000.00 but less than$350,000.00 $9,000+5%over $150,000 $9,000 + 5% over $150,000 (3) $350,000.00 and over $17,500 + 4% over $350,000 $17,500 + 4% over $350,000 (iii) Site Plan/Zoning Review and Inspection Fees'' 0.5%of cost 0.5%of cost (iv) Plan Revision following Permit Issuance (1) Minor (Results in a change 10%or less than the cost of improvements'. Excludes minor adjustments that are $280 $280 aooroved by the Citv to be shown on record drawines.) (2) Maior(Results in a change of greater than 10% of the cost of improvements7.1 $1,700 $1,700 (v) Wet weather (annual fee) $3,000 $3,000 ' The fee for a grading license authorizing additional work to that under a valid license shall be the difference between the fee paid for the original license and the fee shown for the entire project. ' Any unused fee may be carried forward to the next year. If any work is done before the license is issued, the grading license fee shall be doubled. ' All developers, municipal or quasi -municipal entities, or utility corporations or companies, except those specifically exempted, shall pay fees under this Section. Exempted entities include City -franchised cable TV, cable modem. natural eas. telecommunications. and electrical Power. Includes three (3) review cycles. Additional reviews will be charged 51.700 each. s If deemed necessary by the City in its sole discretion, the City will contract with one or more consultants to provide plan reviews and/or inspections with the related costs and expenses payable by the applicant. a The fee shall be based up Percentage of the estimated cost of improvements. ' Cost of improvements shall be based on the City's bond quantity worksheet and shall include all project related improvements outside of the building envelopes, including, but not limited to, all costs required to construct the following: paved parking lots, private sidewalks or walkways; private and public storm water management facilities; temporary erosion and sedimentation control facilities; water quality facilities; public and private streets; public and private sanitary sewers; public water main improvements; required off -site street, bike and pedestrian improvements; street lighting improvements; required landscaping and street tree improvements; and site grading and mobilization costs. The applicant may elect to submit a separate, itemized cost estimates for each item of improvement subject to the approval by the City. a Fifty Percent (50%) of the fee is due at Civil Construction Permit Application and the remaining shall be due prior to permit issuance. Latecomers' Agreement Application Fees': (I) Processing fee' (Nonrefundable) (1) $50,000 or less $1,120 $1,120 (2) Over $50,000 but less than $200,000 $2,250 $2,250 (3) $200,000 and over $4,500 $4,500 (ii) Multi -family: 2 units. Duplexes. & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)' (1) $50,000 or less 15%of total 15%of total (2) Over $50,000 but less than $200,000 10%of total 10%of total (3) $200,000 and over 5%of total 5%of total (iii) Segregation processing fee, if applicable $840 $840 ' Fees are based on the amount covered by the Latecomers'. z The administration and collection fee is deducted from each individual latecomer fee payment and the balance forwarded to the holder of the latecomer's agreement pursuant to RMC 9-5, Tender of Fee. Utility System Development Charges (SDC): (1) Water and Wastewater System Development Charges (SDC) (1) 5/8 x 3/4 inch and 1 inch: (a) Water service fee1'0 $4,850 $4,850 (b) Fire sprinkler service fee''' $648 $648 (c) Wastewater fee''0 $3,650 $3,650 (2) 1-1/2 inch: (a) Water service fee° $24,250 $24,250 (b) Fire sprinkler service fee''' $3,238 $3,238 (c) Wastewater fee $18,250 $18,250 (3) 2 inch: (a) Water service fee° $38,800 $38,800 (b) Fire sprinkler service fee''' $5,181 $5,181 (c) Wastewater fee $29,200 $29,200 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023-2024 3. Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: (Continued) c. Utility System Development Charges(SDC): (Continued) (4) 3 inch: (a) Water service fee° $77,600 $77,600 (b) Fire sprinkler service fee''' $10,362 $10,362 (c) Wastewater fee $58,400 $58,400 (5) 4 inch: (a) Water service fee° $121,250 $121,250 (b) Fire sprinkler service fee''' $16,191 $16,191 (c) Wastewater fee $91,250 $91,250 (6) 6 inch: (a) Water service fee° $242,500 $242,500 (b) Fire sprinkler service fee''' $32,383 $32,383 (c) Wastewater fee $182,500 $182,500 (7) 8 inch: (a) Water service fee° $388,000 $388,000 (b) Fire sprinkler service fee''' $51,812 $51,812 (c) Wastewater fee $292,000 $292,000 (ii) Storm Water System Development Charges (SDC): (1) New single family residence (including mobile/manufactured homes) & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)' $2,300 $2,300 (2) Addition to existing single family residence greater than 500 square feet (including mobile/manufactured $0.920 per sq foot $0.920 per sq foot homes) Fee not to exceed $2,300 (3) All other uses charge per square foot of new impervious surface, but not less than $2,300 $0.920 per sq foot $0.920 per sq foot (iii) Utility SDC Seereeation Reauests $840+ administrative costs $840+ administrative costs (iv) Temporary Utility Connection : (1) Storm Water Fee; Fee equal to thirty percent (30%) of the current SDC applicable to that portion of the 30% of SDC 30% of SDC property. (2) Wastewater Fee; Annual fee equal to thirty percent (30%) of the current SDC applicable to the size of the 30% of SDC 30% of SDC temporary domestic water meter(s). (3) Water Fee; Annual fee equal to thirty percent (30%) of the current SDC applicable to the size of the temporary 30% of SDC 30% of SDC water meter(s). ' This fee shall be reduced by fifty percent (50%) for Accessory Dwelline Units (ADU). ' Based uoon the size of the fire sorinkler service (NOT detector bvoass meterl ' Unless a separate fire sprinkler service is provided, the system development charge(s) shall be based upon the size of the meter installed and a separate Fire sprinkler service fee will not be charged. Any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service is eligible for a prorated system development charge is eligible for credit of the existing connection. Feels) based upon meter(s) proposed for final project will be reduced by the feels) based upon meter existine on site. s The applicant shall pay the City's administrative costs for the preparation, processing and recording of the partial payment of the fee(s). If the same segregation is used for more than one utility's special assessment district, and/or latecomer's charee. then only one administrative fee is collected. s Temporary connection may be granted for a one-time, temporary, short-term use of a portion of the property for a period not to exceed three (3) consecutive years. Fee shall be paid annually (non -prorated), and shall be nonrefundable, nontransferable (from one portion of the property to another) and shall not constitute a credit to the system development charge due at the time of permanent use of the utility system. The application for temporary connection shall consist of a detailed plan and a boundary line of the proposed development service area for use in the fee determination. d. Utility Construction Permit Fees: (i) Water Construction Permit Fees: (1) Water Testing, Construction, and Administration Fees: (a) Water meter tests for 3/4" to 2" meter $50 $50 (b) Water meter tests on meters 2" or larger $60 deposit + $60 deposit+ time and materials time and materials (c) Open and close fire hydrants for fire flow tests conducted by others. Time and materials Time and materials (d) Water service disconnection(cut at main) $275 $275 (e) Meter resets $95 $95 (f) Repair of damage to service $250 $250 (g) Water main connections $560 $560 (h) Water main cut and cap $1,025 $1,025 (i) Water quality/inspection/purity tests $80 $80 0) Specialty water tests (lead, copper, etc) Cost of test+ Cost of test+ $70 processing fee $70 processing fee (k) Water turn ons/offs after hours $185 $185 (I) Installation of isolation valve. $2,000 deposit+ $2,000 deposit+ time and materials time and materials (m) New water line chlorination fee. Fee plus $0.15 per lineal foot for any footage after the first two hundred $250+$0.15 per lineal foot $250+$0.15 per lineal foot fifty (250) lineal feet (n) Miscellaneous water installation fees. Time and materials Time and materials (o) Service size reductions $50 $50 (p) Installation fees for ring and cover castings $200 $200 (2) Water meter installation fees - City installed: (a) 3/4" meter installed by City within City limits.2 (i) Installation of stub service and meter setter only. $2,875 $2,875 (ii) Drop in meter only $400 $400 (b) 3/4" meter installed by City outside City limits' (i) Installation of stub service and meter setter only. $2,935 $2,935 (ii) Drop in meter only $400 $400 (c) 1" meter installed by the City.' (i) Installation of stub service and meter setter only. $2,875 $2,875 (ii) Drop in meter only $460 $460 (d) 1-1/2" meter installed by the City. (i) Installation of stub service and meter setter only. $4,605 $4,605 (ii) Drop in meter only $750 $750 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023-2024 3. Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: (Continued) d. Utility Construction Permit Fees: (Continued) (e) 2" meter installed by the City. (i) Installation of stub service and meter setter only. $4,735 $4,735 (ii) Drop in meter only $950 $950 (3) Water meter processing fees —Applicant installed: For meters larger than 2", the applicant must provide $220 $220 materials and install the meter. (4) Hydrant Meter fees: (a) Hydrant meter permit fee $50 $50 (b) Deposits: (1) 3/4" meter and backflow prevention assembly. $500 $500 (ii) 3" meter and backflow prevention assembly. $2,000 $2,000 (iii) Deposit processing charge, nonrefundable. $25 $25 (c) Meter rental (begins on day of pickup): (1) 3/4" meter and backflow prevention assembly. Per month. $50 $50 (ii) 3" meter and backflow prevention assembly. Per month. $250 $250 Wastewater and Surface Water Construction Permit Fees': (1) Residential: (a) Wastewater permit fee $375 $375 (b) Surface water permit fee $375 $375 (2) Commercial: (a) Wastewater permit fee $375 $375 (b) Surface water permit fee $375 $375 (3) Industrial: (a) Wastewater permit fee $375 $375 (b) Surface water permit fee $375 $375 (4) Repair or modification of any ofthe above (a) Wastewater permit fee $375 $375 (b) Surface water permit fee $375 $375 (5) Cut and Cap/Demolition Permit: (a) Wastewater permit fee $375 $375 (b) Surface water permit fee $375 $375 (6) Reinspection for Wastewater or Surface Water Permits $375 $375 (7) Ground water discharge (temporary connection to wastewater system for discharge of contaminated ground $375 $375 water over 50,000 gallons) Rate plus billed for current Renton and King County sewer rate on discharged plus King County sewer rate on discharged amount plus King County sewer rate on discharged amount (meter provided by property owner) amount (iv) Street light system fee, per new connection to power system $525 $525 (v) Utility Locate Refresh Fee (Fee is due each time excavator calls in for locate refresh during 45-day locate ticket) (1) Standard locate $500 $500 (2) Large project locate $1,000 $1,000 ' This fee shall be 50 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). z This fee shall be reduced by fifty percent (50%) for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUI. e• Right of Way (ROW) Use Permits Fees' (i) Franchise Permit Fees: (1) Master Service Agreement Application Fee' $5,620 $5,620 (2) Franchise Permit Fees: °'s (a) Small work, including trenching less than 60 linear feet or installation of 6 or less utility poles $670 $670 (b) All other work. permit fee plus staff time Der hours $670+Time and Materials $670+Time and Materials (c) Other public agencies constructing utilities within City right-of-way $670 $670 (3) Small Cell Master Lease Agreement including Site License Addendum and Small Cell Permits (a) Master Lease Agreement Administrative Costs. Staff time Der hour and/or cost of materials.' Time and Materials Time and Materials (b) Pole Reservation, per pole $135 $135 (c) Administrative Fee. Base plus time and/or cost of materials.' $850 deposit +Time and Materials $850 deposit +Time and Materials (d) Public Reimbursement (any costs incurred by the City on behalf of the permit applicant for installation or operation of site equipment) (i) Electrical service (annual fee) (1) Tier 1, Daily peak kWh <20 $715.38 $715.38 (2) Tier 2, Daily peak kWh 21-40 $1,430.76 $1,430.76 (3) Tier3, Daily peak kWh41-60 $2,146.14 $2,146.14 (4) Tier 4, Daily peak kWh 61-80 $2,861.51 $2,861.51 (5) Tier 5, Daily peak kWh>81 $3,576.89 $3,576.89 (ii) All other reimbursement Actual cost Actual cost (e) Site License Addendum Rent $270 $270 (f) Allotherfeess Actual cost Actualcost (4) Conduit Lease Rates per Lineal Foot (annual fee): (a) Tier 1, conduit in existing planter strips $10.00 $10.00 (b) Tier 2, conduit outside of planter strips excluding signalized intersection crossings, bridges and train tracks $20.00 $20.00 (c) Tier 3, conduit within signalized intersection crossings, bridges and train tracks $30.00 $30.00 Short -Term ROW Permit Fees (duration 30 days or lesslz": (1) Single family residence, one unit only $370 $370 (2) All other uses, excluding those listed $700 $700 (3) Wastewater or storm water service $375 $375 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023-2024 3. Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: (Continued) e. Right of Wav Use Permits Fees' (Continued) (iii) Long Term ROW Permit Fees (duration over 30 dayslz: (1) Duration greater than thirty (30) days but no more than one (1) year: (a) Within City Limitss; Short -Term ROW Permit Fee associated with use plus leasehold excise tax (LET)' Short -Term ROW Short -Term ROW Permit Fee + LET' Permit Fee + LET' (b) King County ROW Permits/Inspections: (i) Service Installation Only $1,025 $1,025 (ii) Utility Extension per 100' of Length (Min 200' Length) $1,025 $1,025 (2) Duration greater than one (1)year s,m: (I) Single family and two family uses"; fee assessed annually plus leasehold excise tax (LET)', if $50+LET' $50+LET' applicable (ii) All uses without public benefit; fee is a per month charge assessed annually based on property value" 0.5%x Value"+ LET' 0.5%x Value"+ LET' of land to be utilized, plus leasehold excise tax', if applicable. (iii) All other uses; fee is a per year charge of assessed value of land adjoining the property ",Plus 0.5%xValue1z+LET' 0.5%xValue1z+LET' leasehold excise tax', if applicable. In no case less than $50.00. (iv) Oversize Load Permits $10 $10 ' Bond reauired pursuant to RMC 9-10-5 ' Work and/or use of the right of way, including those associated with a Civil Construction Permit and excludes utilities from other public agencies and service providers which shall be considered under a franchise permit. ' The fixed application fee established herein is intended to cover the City's internal administrative costs in processing and administering the franchise. In addition to the fixed application fee, the City may require applicants to either directly pay or reimburse the City for external costs reasonably incurred to process the application and/or administer the franchise agreement. The City may require applicants to deposit funds in advance to cover legal and/nr nth— nrnfeaainnal cervicec feac ac thav are incurred. The City may decide to contract with a consultant to perform Dian reviews and inspections and may bill such costs and expenses directly to the applicant. s If a franchise aereement does not specifv the fee amount. the eeneric fee. as identified in this fee schedule. shall be collected. Reeular hours and standard after hour and overtime fees aDDIv, zA no fee permit may be issued for the following: individual homeowners performing work in street ROW for street tree or parking strip irrigation systems; residential moving pods or moving trucks provided that they are in the ROW for no more than three (3) days; use in CD zone provided ground disturbing activity is not proposed; and work associated with City of Renton capital improvement projects or City funded projects. a A no fee permit may be issued for the following: A public agency and when the proposed use of the right-of-way provides a direct service to the public (e.g., Metro applications for right-of-way for bus shelters); and work associated with City of Renton capital improvement oroiects or ON funded oroiects. 9 Leasehold excise tax (LET) imposed pursuant to Chapter 82.29A RCW on leasehold interests for the use of real or personal public property shall be collected from the permittee at a rate established by the State of Washington. 10 Insurance Reauired: Public Liabilitv and oroDertv damaee insurance is also reauired Pursuant to RMC 9-2-58. Minimum Permit Reauirements for Excess Right-of-Wav Use. " Except those single familv and two family uses that utilize right of wav alone a waterfront. 'z Right-of-wav value shall be based on the assessed value of the land adioinine the Droperty as established by the Kine County Assessor. f. Release of easement fees: The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning this charge are detailed in chapter 9-1 RMC, Easements. (i) Filing fee (ii) Processing fee g. Street and Alley vacation Fees: The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning this charge are detailed in chapter 9-14 RMC, Vacations. (i) Filing fee (ii) Processing and completion fee, payable upon Council approval of the vacation and upon administrative determination of appraised value of vacated right-of-way. Appraised Value of Vacated right-of-way: (1) Lessthan$25,000 (2) $25,OOOto$75,000 (3) Over$75,000 Miscellaneous Fees: 1i) Street Frontage Improvements Fee -In -Lieu:' (1) All eligible uses except Single Family Additions less than 1,160 sq ft: (a) Street with existing storm drainage mainline (b) Street with existing conveyance ditch (2) Single Family Additions less than 1,160 Sq Ft: Proportional share of the fee in lieu of all eligible uses fee based $280 $280 $280 $280 $560 $560 $840 $840 $1,410 $1,410 $2,250 $2,250 $130/LF $130/LF $150/LF $150/LF (Sq Ft of addition / 1,160 sq ft) of Fee -in -lieu (Sq Ft of addition / 1,160 sq ft) of Fee -in -lieu on square footage of addition. (ii) Re -inspection Fee $158 $158 (iii) Inspection for Unscheduled Work $158 $158 (iv) Reeular Staff Review and Insoection Hours' $158/hr $158/hr (v) After hours inspection° $175/hr $175/hr (vi) Permit review staff overtimes $175/hr $175/hr (vii) Public Works Reimbursements Actual cost Actual cost (viii) Standard or minor drainage adjustment review $670 $670 ' This fee shall be SO for Accessory Dwelline Units (ADUI. ' Unscheduled work includes, but is not limited to, site work that is found to be occurring, or did occur, for which an inspection was not scheduled. Fee is subject to be applied for each occurrence but does not replace a stop work order or other code violation as determined applicable by the City. The fee is in addition to any other applicable inspection fees. The fee may provide day of inspection at the discretion and availablility of the City inspector. ' ADDlies only to those fees that are noted as time and materials and Performed during citv staff regular work schedule. ° ADDlies to inspections Performed on Saturdays. Sundays, observed City of Renton holidays, and non -holiday Mondav-Fridays outside the hours of 7:OOam to 3:30Dm s Applies only if permit review is requested by the applicant to be performed on Saturdays, Sundays, observed City of Renton holidays, and non -holiday Monday -Fridays outside of the hours of city staff regular work schedule Any work performed by City forces or under City contract on behalf of a permit applicant to repair damage to the City infrastructure or caused by the permit applicant or contractor under its control, or any and all roadway or right-of-way cleanup efforts performed by City forces or under City contract that resulted from the work performed by the permit applicant or contractors under its control. City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023-2024 ,SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT•\ \ 1) 11117 2023 2024 4. Technology Surcharge Fee An additional technology surcharge shall be required for all fees included in the following Subsections of section XII, Development 5.0% 5.0% Fees, of the City of Renton Fee Schedule Brochure: Subsection 1, Building Fees; Subsection a, except for appeals, critical areas review fee, and direct EIS costs, of subsection 2, Land Use Review Fees; Subsections a, b, c(iii), d, and e, except Master Franchise/Small Cell Permit Application Fee and Long Term ROW Permit Fees (duration over one year), of subsection 3, Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way S. Impact Fees: a. School Impact Fees: (i) Issaquah School District (1) Single Family Fee $11,377 $11;37;! $15,510 (2) Multi Family, Duplex, & Accessory Dwelling Fee (ADU) $4,718 $4;719 $3,514 III) Kent School District (1) Single Family Fee $0.00 $0.00 (2) Multi Family, Duplex, & Accessory Dwelling Fee (ADU) $0.00 $0.00 (iii) Renton School District (1) Single Family Fee $2,911 $2,911$2,161 (2) Multi Family. Duplex, & Accessory Dwelling Fee 1ADU1' $3,697 $3,697 $4,257 (iv) School Impact Fee Administration 5%x School Impact Fee 5%x School Impact Fee ' This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). b• Transportation Impact Fees3'3'4: ITE Land Use Codes (4) $i8b8 $i0,68 R 0) _ °-Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)}, per dwelling ITE LUC 220 7550.92 $0.00 7550.92-$0.00 (44 (ii) Church, per sq foot ITE LUC 560 $6.02 §b2-$4.79 ( 4(iii) Coffee/Donut Shop, no drive up, per sq foot ITE LUC 936 $248.51 248.51$175.21 M (iv) Coffee/Donut Shop, with drive up, per sq foot ITE LUC 937 $261.04 261.94$211.59 Condom :_:um & Duplexes __, dwell:_.. $6-345.23 $6-345.23 (a4+M Convenience market - 24 hour, per sq foot ITE LUC S51 $249.31 249.31-$207.87 (Ai (vi) Daycare, per sq foot ITE LUC 565 $54.94 54.94$19.81 fi*) (vii) Drinking Place, per sq foot ITE LUC 975 $69.16 69.16 14.58 W (viii) Drive-in bank, per sq foot ITE LUC 912 $157.10 157.1$120.84 (ix) Fast Casual Dining with 30 seat max, incl. only walk-up window, per sq foot ITE LUC 930 $68.10 (x) Fast food, no drive -up, per sq foot ITE LUC 933 $159.44 15944$180.23 (xi) Fast food, with drive -up, per sq foot ITE LUC 934 $203.13 293.13$182.87 (xii) Gas station with convenience store, per pump ITE LUC 945 $73,411.90 73 41:1.9$89,966.30 (xiii) Gas station, per pump ITE LUC 944 $98,150.27 799150.27 $87,536.72 (xiv) General Light Industrial, per sq foot ITE LUC 110 $10.68 $6.36 0&4 (xv) General office, per sq foot ITE LUC 710 $16.39 1639 14.07 {W4 (xvi) Health/fitness club, per sq foot ITE LUC 492 $40.49 40.49 $35.23 (xvii) High -Cube Warehouse: Cold Storage, per sq foot2 ITE LUC 157 $2.57 (xiii) High -Cube Warehouse: Fulfillment Center INS), per sq foot2 ITE LUC 155 $2.33 (xix) High -Cube Warehouse: Parcel Hub, per sq foot2 ITE LUC 156 $10.12 (xx) High -Cube Warehouse: Transload/Short-Term, per sq foot2 ITE LUC 154 $1.61 (W 4} (xxi) Hospital, per sq foot ITE LUC 610 $8.76 g 7G$7.22 Oa 4i) (xxii) Hotel, per room ITE LUC 310 $4,819.16 .16 $4,216.05 (xxiii) Industrial Park, per sq foot2 ITE LUC 130 $5.62 (x4*) (xxiv) Manufacturing, per sq foot2 ITE LUC 140 $8.04 8b4$10.36 oo4 (xxv) Marina, per boat berth ITE LUC 420 $2,570.22 2570..22-$2,286.67 (- q (xxvi) Medical office, per sq foot ITE LUC 720 $37.02 37.92-$36.23 OGA4 (xxvii) M n WaFehause, peF Sq f9et $2,89 fmig(xxiii) Mobile home, per dwelling ITE LUC 240 $7,228.75 7a8.75-$7,068.11 (-xx4v} (mix) Motel, per room ITE LUC 320 $4,417.57 �7.57 $3,001.25 (-xxv) (xxx) Movie theater, per seat ITE LUC 445 $722.88 72253$786.04 (xxxi)g Multifamily Housing, per dwelling ITE LUC 220 $7,550.02 7,-82 $6,184.59 (-xx (xxxii) Nursing home, per bed ITE LUC 620 $2,007.98 �7.68-$1,285.11 (-Yx (xxxiii) Restaurant: sit-down, per sq foot ITE LUC 932 $68.51 68.51•$56.02 (xxxiv) Self-service Storage, per sq foot ITE LUC 151 $1.50 (-3xv4ii)(xxxv) Senior housing- detached, per dwelling ITE LUC 251 $3,293.10 3293.1•$3,694.69 (-xx4x) (xxxvi) Shopping center, per sq foot ITE LUC 820 $29.88 29.88 24.37 (-xxx) (xxxvii) Single family house, per dwelling ITE LUC 210 $12,208.54 .54$11,485.67 (-x-xx4) (xxxiii) Supermarket, per sq foot ITE LUC 850 $73.97 7397$63.17 (xxxix) Condom n um & Duplexes -Townhouses, per dwelling ITE LUC 215 $6,345.23 �.23$6,987.79 (xxxx) Warehouse, per sq foot' ITE LUC 150 $3.29 (-xxwi4 (xxxxii) Net New PM Peak Hour Person Vehicle Trip (Proposed - Existing), per PM Peak Hour Person Vehicle Trip 'Th: $8,031.94 $8,031.94 ' ITE LUC: Institutue of Transportation Engineers Land Use Codes defined in the 11th Edition ITE Trip Generation Handbook Impact fees include a Passenger Car -Equivalent IPCE) factor. 3 Applied fee reductions based on uses by percentage of Net New PM Peak Hour Person Vehicle Trip: Early Learning Facilities (i.e. Daycare) is 20%and Commercial/Retail/Industrial is 88.97%except uses with PCE factors which will remain at 100%. 4 All uses within the Center Downtown (CD) Zone shall be reduced to 20% of the assessed transportation impact fee. C. Park Impact Fees: (i) Single family $3,276.44 $3,276.44 III) Multi-familv: 2 units, Duplexes, & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU'' $2,659.70 $2,659.70 (iii) Multi -family: 3 or 4 units $2,531.21 $2,531.21 (iv) Multi -family: 5 or more units $2,222.84 $2,222.84 (v) Mobile home $2,325.63 $2,325.63 ' This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling units (ADU). d. Fire Impact Fees: 0) Residential - single family (detached dwellings & duplexes), per dwelling unit $829.77 829.77$421.98 (ii) Residential - multi family & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU;', per dwelling unit $964.53 964:53$579.41 (iii) Hotel/motel/resort, per sq feet room $1.29 1.29$346.22 (iv) Medical care facility, persq-feet bed $3.92 392-$1,052.00 (v) Office, per sq foot $0.26 G 2&$0.14 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023-2024 S. Impact Fees: (Continued) (vi) Medical/dental office, per sq foot $1.99 3.99-$0.61 (vii) Retail, per sq foot $1.25 3.2-5-$0.66 (viii) Leisure facilities, per sq foot $2.36 236 $0.42 (ix) Restaurant/lounge, per sq foot $5.92 3-92-$1.44 (x) Industrial/manufacturing, per sq foot $0.15 033$0.05 (xi) Church, per sq foot $0.56 036-$0.24 (xii) Education, per sq feet tudent $0.72 0-.72-$28.02 (xiii) Special public facilities, per sq foot R $4.48 4A8 $0.13 ' This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUI. e. Independent Fee Calculation Review (or unless otherwise established by School District or Renton Regional Fire Authority) $560 $560 f. Impact Fee Deferral Administration: (i) Each Lot, Single Family Dwelling, or Condominium $100 $100 (ii) Each Multi -family Building $100 $100 6. Miscellaneous Fees a. Multifamily Tax Exemption Application $1,000.00 $1,000.00 b. Tree Fee in lieu, credit replacement, and/or credit supplement (i) Per diameter inch measured at 4.5 feet above grade $225.00 $225.00 (ii) Labor cost for each 2" caliper (or 6ft tall) tree to be planted $500.00 $500.00 Fire plan review and inspection fees: (1) $0 to $249.99 $50 $50 (ii) $250.00 to$999.99 $50+2%of the cost $50+2%of the cost (iii) $1,000.00 to$4,999.99 $75+2%of the cost $75+2%of the cost (iv) $5,000.00 to $49,999.99 $200 + 1.5% of the cost $200 + 1.5% of the cost (v) $50,000.00 to $99,999.99 $450 + 1.2% of the cost $450 + 1.2% of the cost (vi) $100,000.00 and above $950+.75%of the cost $950+.75%of the cost (vii) Construction Re -inspection. Fee is per hour with a 2 hour minimum. The minimum may be assessed if the $175 $175 requested inspection does not meet the approval of the inspector. (viii) Violation/Second Re -Inspection after 30-day period (whenever 30 days or more have passed since Fire $150 $150 Department notification of a violation, which required a first re -inspection, and such violation has not been remedied or granted an extension) (ix) Third and subsequent re-Inspection/Pre-Citation Follow -Up Inspection when re -inspections are required beyond $250 $250 the first and second re -inspections (x) Preventable Fire alarm fee: (1) First, second, and third preventable alarms N/C N/C (2) Fourth and fifth preventable alarms in a calendar year, fee is per each alarm. $75 $75 (3) Sixth preventable alarm and successive preventable alarms in a calendar year, fee is per each alarm. $150 $150 (xi) Late Payment Penalty $35 $35 b. Fire Permit type: (i) Operational fire code permit (issued in accordance with Section 105.6 of the IFC) fee is yearly (includes items such $150 $150 as fire special events, covered stages, mobile food facilities, hot works, etc.'. (ii) Permits for Mobile food facilities that have passed a fire and life safety inspection in another jurisdiction that has $75 $75 reciprocity with Renton RFA (iii) Hazardous materials and HPM facilities yearly $250 $250 (iv) Construction permit: 20% of plan review fee- 20% of plan review fee - Min. $75 Min. $75 (v) Hazardous production materials permit (for businesses storing, handling, or using hazardous production materials $250 $250 as regulated in the fire code) permit is yearly (vi) Underground tank removal permit (commercial) See Fire plan review and See Fire plan review and construction permit fees construction permit fees (vii) Underground tank removal or abandonment -in- place permit (residential) $200 $200 (viii) Other requested inspection when not required by the fire code, or when requested for after hours inspections. $175 $175 Fee is per hour with a minimum- 2 hF hours when approved by the Fire Marshal, such as home daycares. (ix) (VIII) Non -emergency Billable Services (ie: boat assists, etc) Rates published at: WFC Current Wage and WFC Current Wage and www.washingtonfirechiefs.com Equipment Rate Equipment Rate (x) NSF check fees $25 $25 (xi) RFA technology surcharge fee applied to Fire Department Fire Marshal Fees, subsection a. (i, ii, iii, iv, v, vi) and 5% 5% subsection b. (iii) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023-2024 1. Effect of Schedule. This schedule establishes default base penalties for violations of the Renton Municipal Code that are issued as infractions under the authority of RCW 7.80 RCW, but these penalties do not include any state -imposed statutory assessments. Except as otherwise prohibited by law or court rule, a court with jurisdiction over the infraction may impose on a defendant a lesser penalty in an individual case. Provided that, whenever the base penalty plus mandatory statutory assessments results in a total payment that is not an even dollar amount, the base penalty is deemed to be amended to a higher amount which Droduces the next greatest even dollar total 2. Penalties Established by Court Rule or Specific Penalty Established by Law. This schedule does not apply to penalties established by state or local court rule or to a penalty that is established in law with a specific amount (i.e. ordinance or statute setting a penalty equal to a specified amount rather than a penalty up to a maximum amount). To the extent a penalty scheduled herein conflicts with a state or local court rule or a penalty that is established in law, this schedule shall be deemed preempted by the court rule or penalty established in IaH 3. Penalties: The following violations shall carry the following listed default base penalty, not including statutory assessments: a. Violation of Park Rules (Civil Infraction) RMC 2-9-8.0 $73 $73 i. Activities Prohibited in a Park RMC 2-9-8.C.1 $73 $73 ii. Disregard Park Trail Sign RMC 2-9-8.C.2 $73 $73 iii. Unauthorized Vehicle in a Park RMC 2-9-8.C.3 $73 $73 iv. Operating Motorized Vehicle on Park Trail RMC 2-9-8.C.4 $73 $73 V. Dismount Zone Violation RMC 2-9-8.C.5 $73 $73 vi. Speeding on Trails RMC 2-9-8.C.6 $73 $73 vii. Vehicle/Boat Repair in Park RMC 2-9-8.C.7 $73 $73 viii. Racing in Park RMC 2-9-8.C.8 $73 $73 ix. SCUBA Diving in Park RMC 2-9-8.C.9 $73 $73 X. Camping/Overnight Stay in Parks RMC 2-9-8.C.10 $73 $73 A. Fire/Barbeque in Park RMC 2-9-8.C.11 $73 $73 xii. Metal Detecting RMC 2-9-8.C.12 $73 $73 xiii. Glass Container in Park with Swimming Area RMC 2-9-8.C.13 $73 $73 xiv. Group Rally/Special Use Permit RMC 2-9-8.C.14 $73 $73 xv. Parking & Mooring Violation RMC 2-9-8.C.15 $73 $73 xvi. City Events Violation RMC 2-9-8.C.16 $73 $73 xvii. Alcohol in Park RMC 2-9-8.C.17 $73 $73 xviii. Smoking in Park RMC 2-9-8.C.17 $73 $73 b. Possession/Sale/Discharge of Fireworks RMC 4-5-070.C.102 $49 $49 C. Animal Control — No License RMC 5-4-1 $49 $49 d. Littering RMC 6-14-22 $50 $50 I. Litter in Public Spaces RMC 6-14-3 $50 $50 ii. Placement of Litter in Receptacles RMC 6-14-4 $50 $50 iii. Sweeping Litter in Gutters RMC 6-14-5 $50 $50 iv. Merchants' Duty RMC6-14-6 $50 $50 V. Litter Thrown By Persons in Vehicles RMC 6-14-7 $50 $50 vi. Truck Loads Causing Litter RMC 6-14-8 $50 $50 vii. Litter in Lakes and Fountains RMC 6-14-10 $50 $50 viii. Throwing/Distributing Commercial Handbills in RMC 6-14-11 Public Places $50 $50 ix. Placing Handbills on Vehicles RMC 6-14-12 $50 $50 X. Depositing Handbills on Uninhabited/Vacant RMC 6-14-13 Premises $50 $50 A. Prohibiting Distribution of Handbills Where RMC 6-14-14 Properly Posted $50 $50 xii. Distributing Handbills at Inhabited Private Premises RMC 6-14-15 $50 $50 xiii. Dropping Litter from Aircraft RMC 6-14-16 $50 $50 xiv. Posting Notices Prohibited RMC 6-14-17 $50 $50 xv. Litter on Occupied Private Property RMC 6-14-18 $50 $50 xvi. Owner to Maintain Premises Free of Litter RMC 6-14-19 $50 $50 xvii. Litter of Vacant Lots RMC 6-14-20 $50 $50 e. Animal Control —Animal at Large RMC 6-6-1.A $49 $49 f. AnimalControl— Animal/Fowl Habitual Noise RMC6-6-5.A $49 $49 g. Encroachment on Public Property RMC 9-17-10 $100 $100 h. Negligent Operation of Watercraft RMC 9-3-5 $42 $42 i. Speed Regulations of Watercraft RMC 9-3-7 $42 $42 j. Obstructions of Waterways RMC 9-3-10 $122 $122 k. Equipment Numbering Violation RMC 9-3-26 $42 $42 I. Violation of Rules of the Road RMC 9-3-31 $42 $42 m. Inattentive Driving RMC 10-12-25 $67 $67 n. Truck Route Violation RMC 10-12-26 $42 $42 o. Avoiding Intersection RMC 10-12-27 $42 $42 p. Unsafe Use of Scooter RMC 10-12-28.0 $42 $42 q. Use of Scooter Where Prohibited RMC 10-12-28.D $42 $42 r. Use of Scooter Without a Helmet RMC 10-12-28.E.1 $42 $42 S. No Reflectors on Scooter RMC 10-12-28.E.2 $42 $42 t. No Muffler on Scooter RMC 10-12-28.F $42 $42 U. Scooter Operator Under Age 13 RMC 10-12-28.G $42 $42 V. Operating Scooter When Prohibited RMC 10-12-28.H $42 $42 w. Violation of ATV Ordinance RMC 10-2-5 $47 $47 All other violations identified by Renton Municipal Code as an infraction not listed or otherwise specified by court rule or law. $48 $48 RESOLUTION NO. 4513 EXHIBIT B 2023 Capital Facilities Plan of Issaquah School District No. 411 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Issaquah School District No. 411 Issaquah, Washington Adopted: June 22, 2023 Resolution No: 1203 The Issaquah School District No. 411 hereby provides this Capital Facilities Plan documenting present and future school facility requirements of the District. The plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management Act and King County Council Ordinance 21-A. Page 1 of 24 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................................... EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................... STANDARD OF SERVICE................................................................................................. TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION....................................................................................... DEVELOPMENT TRACKING AND STUDENT GENERATION RATES ............................ NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH -RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS ................... NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH -RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS (continued) ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY..................................................................................... TABLE 1: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS & ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS .................. TABLE 2: STUDENT FACTORS — SINGLE FAMILY & MULTI -FAMILY .......................... INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES ......................................... SITE LOCATION MAP....................................................................................................... URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAP............................................................................... ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SIX -YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN ......................... PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS ................ PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS ........................... PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ................................ SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS......................................................................... BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS .......................... APPENDIX A: 2022-23 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES ...................................... APPENDIX B: 2022-23 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES ................................................ APPENDIX C: 2022-23 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES.................................................... APPENDIX D: 2022-23 TOTAL SCHOOL CAPACITIES .................................................. APPENDIX E: 6-YEAR FINANCE PLAN........................................................................... Page 2 of 24 ..2 ..3 ..4 ..5 ..5 ..6 .. 7 ..8 ..9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Issaquah School District (the "District") as the District's primary facility planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and King County Council Code Title 21A. This Plan was prepared using data available in April 2023. This Plan is an update of prior long-term Capital Facilities Plans adopted by the Issaquah School District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole Plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with board policies, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six - Year Capital Facilities Plan. In June 1992, the District first submitted a request to King County to impose and to collect school impact fees on new developments in unincorporated King County. On November 16, 1992, the King County Council first adopted the District's Plan and a fee implementing ordinance. This Plan is the annual update of the Six -Year Plan. King County and the cities of Issaquah, Renton, Bellevue, Newcastle and Sammamish collect impact fees on behalf of the District. Most of these jurisdictions provide exemptions from impact fees for senior housing and certain low-income housing. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any charges in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. Page 3 of 24 STANDARD OF SERVICE School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District's adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration, optimal facility size, class size, educational program offerings, as well as classroom utilization and scheduling requirements and use of re -locatable classroom facilities (portables). Different class sizes are used depending on the grade level or programs offered such as special education or the gifted program. With the passage of Initiative 728 in November 2000, the Issaquah School Board established new class size standards for elementary grades K-5. The Board and District Administration will continue to keep class sizes near the levels provided by 1-728; this will be done via local levy funds. There is also legislation that requires the State to fund Full -Day Kindergarten by 2018. The District provided Full -Day Kindergarten beginning in the 2016-2017 school year. A class size average of 20 for grades K-5 is now being used to calculate building capacities. A class size of 26 is used for grades 6-8 and 28 for grades 9-12. Special Education class size is based on 12 students per class. For the purpose of this analysis, rooms designated for special use, consistent with the provisions of King County Council Code Title 21A, are not considered classrooms. Invariably, some classrooms will have student loads greater in number than this average level of service and some will be smaller. Program demands, state and federal requirements, collective bargaining agreements, and available funding may also affect this level of service in the years to come. Due to these variables, a utilization factor of 95% is used to adjust design capacities to what a building may actually accommodate. Portables used as classrooms are used to accommodate enrollment increases for interim purposes until permanent classrooms are available. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either moved to another school as an interim classroom or removed. The King County decision to no longer allow schools to be built outside the Urban Growth Boundary Line (UGBL) means District owned property planned for a new elementary school and middle school could not be used for its long planned purpose. The District sold this planned site to a third party. The District has acquired one high school site, two elementary school sites and one middle school site inside the UGBL. The State does not provide funding for property purchases. The District's voters approved the 2016 Bond to provide funding or a new high school, new middle school, two new elementary schools, a rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. All of those projects are now complete with the exception of the new high school and one new elementary school, which are both discussed further in this Capital Facilities Plan and will require additional funding sources. The District's voters recently passed a capital levy that will add, in part, funding for the high school. Additional funding for the elementary school is anticipated to be pursued during the six -year planning period. Page 4 of 24 TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION The Issaquah School District Capital Facilities Plan proposes construction of a new high school and a new elementary school to meet capacity at the elementary and high school related to recent and ongoing enrollment growth needs. The District recently completed construction of a new elementary school, Cedar Trails Elementary School, a new middle school, Cougar Mountain Middle School, as well as additions at several elementary schools to help address recent growth needs. The need for new schools and school additions is triggered by comparing our enrollment forecasts with our permanent capacity figures. These forecasts are by grade level and, to the extent possible, by geography. The analysis provides a list of new construction needed by school year. The decision on when to construct a new facility involves factors other than verified need. Funding is the most serious consideration. Factors including the potential tax rate for our citizens, the availability of state funds and impact fees, the ability to acquire land, and the ability to pass bond issues determine when any new facility can be constructed. New school facilities are a response, in part, to new housing which the county or cities have approved for construction. The District's Six -Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E. DEVELOPMENT TRACKING AND STUDENT GENERATION RATES I In order to increase the accuracy and validity of enrollment projections, a major emphasis has been placed on the collection and tracking data of known new housing developments. This data provides two useful pieces of planning information. First, it is used to determine the actual number of students that are generated from a single family or multi -family residence. It also provides important information on the impact new housing developments will have on existing facilities and/or the need for additional facilities. Developments that have been completed or are still selling houses are used to forecast the number of students who will attend our schools from future developments. The District used a third -party consultant to review recent development data and provide updated student generation rates for elementary school, middle school and high school student per new single-family residence and new multi -family housing. Updated rates are shown in Table 2. Page 5 of 24 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH -RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS The District relies on school impact fee revenue to help fund growth -related capacity needs. However, by law, impact fees can only be used to fund a portion of a capacity project. State funding and impact fees are also not reliable sources of revenue. As a result, the District must also rely on local funding to fund school construction. The District has two growth -related capacity projects included in this Capital Facilities Plan: a new high school and a new elementary school. The voters funded the projects as a part of the April 2016 bond and (for the high school) the April 2022 capital levy. The District utilized funds from the 2016 Bond to purchase property for the two schools and to engage in design and permitting work. Additional funding, aside from impact fee revenue and State School Construction Assistance Program dollars, is needed to construct the two schools. As demonstrated in Appendix A the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 8,763 students at the elementary level. This leaves the District's elementary enrollment under permanent capacity by 454 students (current enrollment is identified on page 9). As demonstrated in Appendix B the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 4,946 students at the middle school level. This leaves the District's middle school enrollment under permanent capacity by 321 students (current enrollment is identified on page 9). As demonstrated in Appendix C the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 4,921 students at the high school level. This leaves the District's high school enrollment over permanent capacity by 694 students (current enrollment is identified on page 9). Based on the District's student generation rates (Table 2), the District expects that 0.589 students will be generated from each new single family home and 0.147 students will be generated from each new multi -family dwelling unit. Applying the enrollment projections contained on page 9 to the District's existing permanent capacity (Appendices A, B, and C) and if no capacity improvements are made by the year 2028-29, and permanent capacity is adjusted to 95%, the District elementary population will be over its permanent capacity by 329 students, under permanent capacity at the middle school level by 284 students, and over permanent capacity by 776 students at the high school level. Importantly, the above figures incorporate recently completed growth -projects at the elementary and middle school levels. The District's enrollment projections are developed using two methods: first, the cohort survival — historical enrollment method is used to forecast enrollment growth based upon the progression of existing students in the District; then, the enrollment projections are modified to include students anticipated from new developments in the District. Page 6of24 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH -RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS (continued) To address existing and future capacity needs, the District's six -year construction plan includes the following capacity projects: Facility Projected / Final Location Additional Expansions Completion Date Capacity New High School #4 August 2027 Issaquah 1600 New Elementary #17 August 2028 Issaquah 560 The District recently opened the new Cougar Mountain Middle School, with permanent capacity of 787, and the new Cedar Trails Elementary School, with permanent capacity of 471 students. Both schools were funded by the April 2016 bond and provide capacity to serve new growth. Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data, the District has determined that the planned new high school and new elementary school are needed, in part, to provide capacity improvements necessary to serve students generated by recent and ongoing new residential development. The school impact fee formula ensures that new development only pays for the cost of the facilities necessitated by new development. The fee calculations examine the costs of housing the students generated by each new single family dwelling unit or each new multi -family dwelling unit and then reduces that amount by credits for the anticipated state match and future tax payments. The resulting impact fee is then discounted as required by local ordinances. Thus, by applying the student generation factor to the school project costs, the fee formula only calculates the costs of providing capacity to serve each new dwelling unit. The formula does not require new development to contribute the costs of providing capacity to address existing needs. The King County Council and the City Councils of the cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Newcastle, Renton and Sammamish have created a framework for collecting school impact fees and the District can demonstrate that new developments will have an impact on the District. The impact fees will be used in a manner consistent with RCW 82.02.050-110 and the adopted local ordinances. Engrossed Senate Bill 5923, enacted in the 2015 Legislative Session, requires that developers be provided an option to defer payment of impact fees to final inspection, certificate of occupancy, or closing, with no fees deferred longer than 18 months from building permit issuance. The District adopts the positions that: (1) no school impact fee should be collected later than the earlier of final inspection or 18 months from the time of building permit issuance; and (2) no developer applicant should be permitted to defer payment of school impact fees for more than 20 dwelling units in a single year. The District's recent and ongoing student growth, coupled with the need for the timely funding and construction of new facilities to serve this growth, requires strict adherence to this position. Page 7of24 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY Two basic techniques are used, with the results compared, to establish the most likely range of anticipated student enrollment: 1. The student 3-2-1 cohort survival method. Examine Issaquah School District enrollments for the last 5 years and determine the average cohort survival for the consecutive five-year period. Because cohort survival does not consider students generated from new development it is a conservative projection of actual enrollment. For the same reason, these projections are also slow to react to actual growth. The cohort method is also hampered by the fact that it does account for anomalies affecting enrollment (for example, the Covid-19 pandemic, temporary remote learning and the variations in the transition back to in -person learning). 2. Based on information from King County, realtors, developers, etc., the District seeks to establish the number of new dwelling units that will be sold each year and converts those units to new students based on the following: a) The number of actual new students as a percentage of actual new dwellings for the past several years. (The student generation factors are shown in Table 2) b) Determine the actual distribution of new students by grade level for the past several years, i.e., 5% to kindergarten, 10% to first grade, 2% to 11th grade, etc. c) Based on an examination of the history shown by (a) and (b) above, establish the most likely factor to apply to the projected new dwellings. After determining the expected new students, the current actual student enrollments are moved forward from year to year with the arrived at additions. One of the challenges associated with all projection techniques is that, where new development is in the pipeline, they tend to always show growth because the number of houses and the general population always increases. Enrollments, however, can and do decrease even as the population increases. The reason is as the population matures, the number of kindergartners will go down as the number of 10th graders is still increasing. To adjust for this factor, the number of school age children per dwelling is examined. When this number exceeds expectations, it is probably because the District is still assuming kindergarten growth, while the main growth is actually moving into middle school. When this happens, a reduction factor is added to kindergarten to force it to decrease even though the general population continues to grow. A precise statistical formula has not been developed to make this adjustment. After all of the projections have been made and examined, the most likely range is selected. An examination of past projections compared with actual enrollment indicates the cohorts tend to be more accurate over a ten-year time span while dwelling units tend to be more accurate over a shorter period. The probable reason is that over a ten-year period, the projections tend to average out even though there are major shifts both up and down within the period. The Covid-19 pandemic has complicated projections in recent years. The District has experienced a return to in -person learning in the last two years but continues to monitor student enrollment closely. As with last year's projections, this year's projections are more conservative than in previous years to allow the District to gather additional data and experience. Like other districts, the District is also experiencing fewer students at the high school level enrolling in Running Start options and instead choosing to be fully enrolled in the District 9-12 program. Enrollment projections for the years 2023-2024 through 2036-2037 are shown in Table 1 (page 9). These projections are conservative in the near -term (within a 5 year period). The District assumes that a post - pandemic increase in enrollment will occur, but does not believe our historical peak enrollment will be reached within the next 7 years. The District however, could have a large uptick in enrollment depending upon land use decisions, housing and labor market, etc. The District will monitor these matters and include updated information in future updates to the Capital Facilities Plan. Page 8 of 24 TABLE 1: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS &ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS: 2014-15 THRU 2022-23 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS: 2023-24 THRU 2D36-37 FTE ENROLLMENT Year K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th lath 11jh 12th TOWS K-5 6-8 9-12 Total 2014-15 694 1494 1552 1478 1545 1555 1512 1491 1432 1495 1152 2292 1115 19,007 5319 4495 5254 18,047 2015-16 661 1$47 15$8 1615 154$ 15$2 1644 1552 1524 1472 14$9 1167 1136 18,447 8511 4672 5264 18,447 2016-17• 140E 1483 1623 1609 1650 1604 1626 L626 1595 1565 1475 1290 1063 19,607 9377 4837 5393 19,647 2017-19 L447 1561 1535 1691 1641 16E0 1627 1655 1651 1629 1545 1243 1165 20,071 955S 4933 S584 20,072 2018-19 1337 1519 1591 1555 1720 1645 1729 1631 1638 1677 1565 1308 1061 19,970 9367 4992 5612 19,971 2019-20 1453 1467 1593 1554 1603 1743 1fi80 1731 1648 1651 1626 1263 L134 20,246 9513 5059 S674 20,246 2OW-21 1133 1441 1398 1530 1589 1529 1662 1616 1678 1629 1595 1244 109E 19,142 M20 4956 5566 19,142 2021-22 1171 1237 2401 1389 1494 1518 1527 1602 15E3 1654 1577 1305 1164 18,€22 821E 4712 SGN 18,621 2022-29 1246 1332 1296 1442 1409 1531 1526 1532 1596 1589 i594 1327 1149 11.8,569 825fr 4654 5659 15,559 2023-24 1274 1403 1390 1352 1461 1429 1554 1532 1539 150E 1550 1302 1255 19,549 9309 4625 5615 1.8,549 2024-25 1240 1403 144E 1429 1380 1471 1455 1564 1546 1570 1586 1273 1186 16,553 9373 4565 5615 16,S53 2025-26 124E 1369 1443 14S4 1455 13E9 1499 1464 1S79 1580 1553 1315 L167 18,544 938E 4541 Sb15 1.8,544 7026-27 1299 1405 1430 1498 1529 1482 1434 1523 1489 1623 1571 1303 1222 18,809 &643 4446 5719 18,608 2027-28 1279 146E 1496 1497 156D 1577 1539 1474 1561 1546 1624 1330 1207 19,147 M67 4573 5707 19,147 MS-29 1487 1427 1525 1537 1533 1583 1612 1556 1494 1597 1529 1358 1213 19,451 9092 4662 5697 19,451 2029-30 1492 1fi33 1484 1575 1376 1557 1621 1632 1S79 1534 1584 126E 1252 19,786 9317 4831 S638 19,796 2030-31 1509 1642 1693 1536 1616 1602 1597 1643 1656 1620 1523 1326 1164 20,127 959E 4&96 5634 20,128 2031-32 1527 1663 1705 1747 1590 1646 1645 1622 1669 1700 1611 126E 1223 20,806 986E 4936 S802 20,&m 2032-33 1531 16&0 1726 1750 1792 1611 1688 1570 1647 1713 1690 1354 1163 21,025 101M 5045 5920 21,425 2033-34 1525 1681 1740 177E 1801 1819 1659 1710 1693 1689 1701 1431 1248 21,48D 1435E 5053 606E 21,479 2034-35 1550 1690 1742 1793 1821 1928 1859 1673 1734 1736 1678 1443 1326 21,873 10424 5266 5183 21,873 2035-36 1562 1702 1751 1795 1836 1E49 1969 1883 1698 1777 172S 14H 133E 22,205 A 495 5450 6261 22,206 2036-37 1572 1714 1763 1805 1838 1&64 1890 1893 1907 1741 1766 1468 1316 2Z+S37 10556 5690 6291 22,537 ' 2-016-17 Enrollment reflects the addition of State Funded Full Day Kindergarten Page 9of24 TABLE 2: STUDENT FACTORS - SINGLE FAMILY & MULTI -FAMILY Housing Type Housing Units K-5 Students 6-8 Students 9-12 students K-5 6-8 9 12 K 12 Tutal Single-family 1,3(:; 431 188 185 0.315 0.138 0.135 C 5" Multifamily` 1,595 142 47 46 0.089 O.Q29 0.029 ` fly Table 1 sources: Issaquah School District March 2023 Student Information System enrollment, Icing County GIS parcel areas, and Kinf, County Department of Assessments residential building, apartment complex, and condo complex data with year built 2017-2021. 1. Multi -Family includes multi -family apartments, condominiums, duplexes, triplexes, 4-plexe5, and tow nhomes. Page 10 of 24 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES Currently, using the 95% utilization factor, the District has the capacity to house 18,630 students in permanent facilities and 4,290 students in portables. While portables are critical for interim capacity needs, they are not desirable nor long-term capacity solutions. The District looks to its permanent capacity, as adjusted for utilization, for purposes of determining growth -related needs and addressing school capacity. The projected student enrollment for the 2023-2024 school year is expected to be 18,549 which leaves a permanent capacity overage of 80. Enrollment projections indicate permanent capacity needs at the elementary and -high school levels over the six -year planning period. Calculations of elementary, middle school and high school capacities are shown in Appendices A, B and C. Totals are shown in Appendix D. Below is a list of current facilities. These facility locations and sites are shown on the District Site Location Map. EXISTING FACILITIES LOCATION GRADE SPAN K-5: Apollo Elementary 15025 S.E. 117th Street, Renton Briarwood Elementary 17020 S.E. 134th Street, Renton Cascade Ridge Elementary 2020 Trossachs Blvd. S.E., Sammamish Cedar Trails Elementary 4399 Issaquah -Pine Lake Rd S.E. , Sammamish Challenger Elementary 25200 S.E. Klahanie Blvd., Issaquah Clark Elementary 335 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah Cougar Ridge Elementary 4630 167th Ave. S.E., Bellevue Creekside Elementary 20777 SE 16th Street, Sammamish Discovery Elementary 2300 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Endeavour Elementary 26205 S.E. Issaquah -Fall City Rd., Issaquah Grand Ridge Elementary 1739 NE Park Drive, Issaquah Issaquah Valley Elementary 555 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah Maple Hills Elementary 15644 204th Ave. S.E., Issaquah Newcastle Elementary 8440 136th Ave S.E., Newcastle Sunny Hills Elementary 3200 Issaquah -Pine Lake Rd. S.E., Sammamish Sunset Elementary 4229 W. Lk. Sammamish Pkwy. S.E., Issaquah GRADE SPAN 6-8: Beaver Lake Middle School 25025 S.E. 32nd Street, Issaquah Cougar Mountain Middle School 1929 NW Talus Dr, Issaquah Issaquah Middle School 600 2nd Ave. Ave. S.E., Issaquah Maywood Middle School 14490 168th Ave. S.E., Renton Pacific Cascade Middle School 24635 SE Issaquah -Fall City Rd, Issaquah Pine Lake Middle School 3095 Issaquah -Pine Lake Rd., Sammamish GRADE SPAN 9-12: Issaquah High School 700 Second Ave. S.E., Issaquah Liberty High School 16655 S.E. 136th Street, Renton Skyline High School 1122 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Gibson Ek High School 379 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah SUPPORT SERVICES: Administration Building 5150 2201h Ave S.E., Issaquah Holly Street Early Learning Center 565 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah May Valley Service Center 16404 S.E. May Valley Road, Renton Transportation Center 805 Second Avenue S.E., Issaquah Transportation Satellite 3402 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Page 11 of 24 SITE LOCATION MAP Page 12 of 24 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAP Page 13 of 24 THE ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SIX -YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN The District's Six -Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E. Shown in Table 3 is the District's projected capacity to house students, which reflects the additional facilities as noted. Voters passed a $533 million bond in April 2016 to fund the purchase of land for and construction of a new high school, a new middle school, two new elementary schools, the rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. The voters also funded an April 2022 capital levy to provide additional funding for the high school project as well as other projects. The District does anticipate receiving State matching funds for High School #4 project that would reduce future bond sale amounts or be applied to new K-12 construction projects included in this Plan. The District will need additional funding to construct the new high school and new elementary school. The District anticipates seeking additional funding within six years. Secured funding will be identified in future updates to this CFP. The District also anticipates that it will receive $500,000 in impact fees and mitigation payments that will be applied to capital projects. The District projects 18,549 FTE students for the 2023-2024 school year and 19,451 FTE students in the 2028-2029 school year. Growth will be accommodated by the planned facilities. Per the formula in the adopted school impact fee ordinance, half of the unfunded growth -related need is assigned to impact fees and half is the local share. Page 14 of 24 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS TABLE 3: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE STUDENTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Years 2023-24 2024-25 2025.26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Permanent Capacity - Existing @ 100% Utilization Rate 9, 724 9,224 9,224 9,224 9,224 9,224 Permanent Capacity - Future Added @ 100% Utilization Rate 0 0 0 0 0 560 Gross Totals @ 100% Utilization Rate 9,224 9,224 9,224 9,224 9,224 9,784 Subtotal @ 95% Utilization Rate 8,763 8,763 8,763 8,763 8,763 9,295 Portable Classrooms Capacity @ 95% Utilization Rate 2,546 2,546 2,546 2,546 2,546 2546 Total Capacity @ 95% Utilization Rate 11,309 11,309 11,309 11,309 11,309 11,841 Projected FTE Enrollment 8,309 8,373 8,388 8,643 8,867 9,092 Permanent Capacity Surplus/Deficit 454 390 1 375 120 .104 203 i_ Permanent Capacity calculations are based on the 95% utilisation factors (See Appendix A)_ 2. The number of portables may be reduced as permanent capacity projects come on line and are open for instruction. Page 15 of 24 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS TABLE 4: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE STUDENTS MIDDLE SCHOOLS Years 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026.27 2027-28 2028-29 Permanent Capacity - Existing @ 100% Utilization Rate 5,206 5,206 5,206 5,206 5,206 5,206 Permanent Capacity - Future Added @ 100% Utilization Rate 0 0 L, 0 0 Gross Totals @ 100% Utilization Rate 5,206 5,20E 5,206 5,206 5,206 5,206 Subtotal LID 95% Utilization Rate 4,946 4,946 4,946 4,945 4,945 4,946 Portable Classrooms Capacity @ 95% Utilization Rate 840 840 840 840 840 840 Total Capacity @ 95% Utilization Rate S,786 5,786 5,786 5,786 5,786 S,786 Projected FTE Enrollment 4,625 4,565 4,541 4,446 4,57.3 4,662 Permanent Capacity Surplus/Deficit 321 381 405 500 373 284 1. Permanent Capacity calculations are based on the 95% utilization factors (See Appendix B), 2_ The number of portables may he reduced as permanent capacity projects come online and are open for instruction_ Page 16 of 24 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS TABLE 5: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE STUDENTS HIGH SCHOOLS Years Z023-24 2024-25 2025.26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Permanent Capacity - Existing @ 100% Utilization Rate 5,190 5,180 5,180 5,180 5,180 6,780 Permanent Capacity - Future Added @ 100% Utilization Rate 0 0 0 0 1,600 0 Gross Totals @ 100% Utilization Rate I K 5,180 5,190 5,180 6,780 6,780 Subtotal 0 95% Utilization Rate 4,M 4,921 4,921 4,921 6,441 6,441 Portable Classrooms Capacity @ 95% Utilization Rate 904 904 904 904 904 904 Total Capacity @ 95% Utilization Rate 5,825 5,825 SX5 5,825 7,345 7,345 Projected FTE Enrollment 5,615 5,615 5,615 5,719 5,707 5,697 Permanent Capacity Surplus/Deficit -694 -694 1 -694 -798 734 744 1. Permanent Capacity calculations are based on the 95% utilization factors (See Appendix Q. 7. The number of portables maybe reduced as permanent capacity projects tome online and are open for instruction. Page 17 of 24 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS DISTRICT: Issaquah School District #411 YEAR: 2023 School Site Acquisition 1 _ Each city or county sets and adopts the amount of the school impact fee_ 7. For the applicable tee schedule, please consult with the permitting jurisdiction for the development project_ Page 18 of 24 Cast: ({Acres x Cask per Acre}lFacll liy Capacity) x Student Ceneratlon Factor Facility Cost! Facility Student Factor Cost) Cost1 Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR 5FR MFR Elementary 7.40 $0 564 4.318 0.488 $Q $0 MiddlelJr High 10.00 $U 850 0.138 0.029 $0 $0 High 40.4� $1,004,000 1,800 0.135 0.429 $3,386 $721 TOTAL $3 386 $721 School Construction Cask; ((Facility CosUFacility Gapacity) x .Student Generation Factor) x (Para nentlTotal Sq Ft) °!°Pemtl Facility Facility Student Factor Costf Corti Total .Ft. {fort capelity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 92.37°�b $52,500,000 560 0.316 0.089 $27.323 $7,710 MiddlafJr High 92.3796 $U 850 0.138 0.429 $0 $[: High 92.37°�b $187,500,000 1,600 0.135 0.025 $14660 $3,171 70711E 1 t#83 10 831 Temporary Facility Cost: ({Facl Ilty CosUFaclllty Capacity) x Student Generation Factor) x (Tern porarylTatal Square Feet] 'lv7empf Facility Facility Student Factor Cast! Casfi Total .Ft. Cost Sae 5FR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 7.B39fo $U SU 0.316 i3.089 $0 $0 MiddlefJr High 7.63°% $Q 56 0.138 0.025 $0 $0 High 7,63°� $0 224 0,135 0,028 $0 $C TOTAL $4 $0 State Matching Cred it: Area Cast Allowance x SPI Square Footage x district Match °rG x Student Factor Current Area Cost 5PI District Student Factor Cost! Castl Allowance rootage Match °!° SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary $ 248.83 80 4.0096 4.318 0.489 $0 $U MiddlelJr High $ 246.83 14$ O.0Q°�6 0.138 0.023 $Q $Q High School $ 246,83 130 36.099'° 0,135 0,029 $1,588 $334 TOTAL $1568 $334 Tax Payment Credit: SFR MFR Average Assessed Value $1,512,796 $49E,038 Capital bond Interest Rake 3.5896 3.5896 Not Prosenk Val Lie of Average dwelling $12,534,744 $4,1i}$,778 Years Amortised 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate $1.02 $1,42 Present Value of Revenue Stream $12,781 54.19 ` Fee Summary: Single -Family Multi -Family Slte Acqulstlon Cocks $3,385,60 5721,00 Permanent Facility Cost $d1,9$3.g0 $14,$31.44 Ternpar2ry Facility Coll $0.00 $0.00 State Match Credit ($1,58$.37) (S333.98) Tax Payment Credit ($r12,781.36) ($4.190.95) FEE {AS CALCULATED} $31,019.07 $7,027.4E Local Share @ Sl7°Jo $15,50E.53 $3,513.73 FINAL FEE $15 $it} $ did BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS SCHOOL SITE ACQUISITION COST: • The District previously purchased sites for the new elementary school and high school. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST: • Elementary $52,500,000 is the estimated construction cost of the project providing additional elementary capacity • High School $187,500,000 is the estimated construction cost of the project providing additional high school capacity PERCENTAGE OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE: Total Square Footage Permanent Square Footage (OSPI) Temporary Square Footage STATE MATCH CREDIT: Current Area Cost Allowance Percentage of State Match Page 19 of 24 2,935,397 2,744,580 190,817 $246.83 36.09% � Q rl rva '� m N ra fl rl ra ra rl M en ra r,.� (,-yyII 4O uj u'j T P.y ry m �fh G Alei ri � � � M Yi 4F1 � � � vt R ✓* � S' irl ut � a m n r op w N W arr w N as "I 7 �b M sD Iti co LO A} LI'I w rY O fY W 4O 00 op '*I 00 M1 M1 18 ri 40 M1 14 M1 04 F- M1 04 W m _ c a ri a w 4 O O tw O O O O O O O C 0 C> O LD rn n m n ry .ti �n ,ti r. v o rni n a w .n n o IO n rl rl r- [v tD o5 'r n iv i In Ip s0 w 99 Wl � tD su W O cd W o oo ao ev M M1 Oi 46 f+} LI'I N G OG Q M1 tY rti N OG Q E:' w ul m IQ ri Oi Cw ry + ryn,O E o2 8 8 8 S 88a ti '1 m,ti4urnu}'}Y'I �, Y'I U Y'F W5 + I/Y +� O '^ E A a P rn bi O m w W Go N M1 O Obi V5 r+i Lp OIV 1 TI NS '7 4 4 F+ 4 0 0 ri5 rrj a'F rPl �D �D Q} LI'I LI � L In r+'I Lp 3 a c 4 E 41 dory V'I Lei ri N fl � YS Q c0 LD M m ry O W F+ r+ SD W r'i r4 •1 O '.'� N {y rV Ti iY rV AF M 11 N N M1I M rV M1I M 1+'I � W w ul q iC w W JWJ J } r,r� J W w U U J O U GO J C� G M N N N O N p OTA g G o0 +h o8 ry n FD 7� 4 C 0 • C 0 W E _ c E E E .E E e, x `c 2 E a 7 d6 � ❑ 3 w � N u3 04 tv � °G � �G G ao- N a m 1.1 rn B B Sj _ u p p C E v C = N E d q S 4 a 5 u d Q uy q C� O I1 0 LU n 1, w Q r.C3 E 0 O m u in q ry c 9 '} E E raml a ^' r,. m w 0 a E $ a � C S 6 M o`o a Li ra v W A *m € _ Q w - E n a iv O CO O w O w O u7 w G r-I a m m a n a tt Ln Ln {" � 3 13 u o p ry �_ ec is m `m m= E x E E w �v ry ry ui a ry d T V Gr M R rl W � m 3 F 25 03 m r — to � Q r o o w r � +� V ,y € w � � _ � E _ c #1 4 4 rc O 4 C w C C { � d QQ w TY N w d � m o m p E a = E3 ra rw 91 m c � m . � th d5 G6 ra ao n m EG w W � T. Q Z < � W U Z < Z_ L / y W \ 6 E W X D Z W � � ) / § k � $ / 7 C # L / i M k \ § k d § n m & \ � % / R ( - � \ L ® } � � VM \\ � ¢ A � k kK ® K \ ƒ 2 ƒ t 3 7k § / § :? o 2 \ ) ULC Q k [ % V k RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT C Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan 2022-2023 — 2028-2029 4' KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT MEQUITY EXCELLENCE COMMUNITY Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan 2022-2023 through 2028-2029 June 2023 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256`h Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7526 BOARD of DIRECTORS Mr. Joe Bento, President Ms. Meghan Margel, Vice Director Ms. Leslie Hamada, Legislative Representative Mr. Awale Farah, Director Mr. Tim Clark, Director ADMINISTRATION Israel Vela Superintendent of Schools Dr. Wade Barringer, Associate Superintendent Strategic Initiatives & Operations Dave Bussard, Executive Director Operations & Facilities Sara Dumlao, Assistant Director of Business Services Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table of Contents - Executive Summary............................................................................................ 1 II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection......................................................................... 3 III - Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" ............................................ 7 Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students ............................................... 7 Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students .................................... 8 IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools........................................................ 9 V - Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan.......................................................... 14 VI- Portable Classrooms....................................................................................... 19 VII - Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacity........................................................... 20 VIII- Finance Plan................................................................................................. 26 IX — Summary of Changes to June 2022 Capital Facilities Plan .............................. 34 XAppendices.....................................................................................................35 - Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Kent School District as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2023 for the 2023-2024 school year. This annual update of the Plan reflects no new major capital projects. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all the district's needs. The district may prepare interim and periodic Long -Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, considering a longer or shorter period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the district as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to the cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee- implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Functional capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the interim capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District's standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state's mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional interim capacity. Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction ("OSPI") on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized "snapshot in time" that is used to report the District's enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI. The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of interim facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the interim use of portables. This Plan currently represents projects in process funded primarily by the Kent School District's 2016 Bond, as well as the 2018 Capital Levy. Additional information about these projects can be found on the District's capital projects homepage (link . Additionally, project updates sent to our community of stakeholders can be accessed on the KSD website link . Based on revised student generation rates, our capacity and enrollment projections, the District will stay current with non -collection of student impact fee rate for the coming year. For a short overview, see Section IX (Summary of Changes to the June 2022 Capital Facilities Plan). 2 II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years (See Table 2). For this Plan, the district relied substantially on the results from Dr. Les Kendrick's study of long-range enrollment forecasts for the Kent School District in the Winter of 2022. King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Table 2). 7.49% of 24,337 King County live births in 2018 is projected for 1,824 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2023. This is a decrease of 937 live births in King County over the previous year. Early Childhood Education students (also identified as "ECE"), "Early Childhood Special Education ("ECSE") students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. In addition to live birth data, enrollment projections for October 1, 2023 going forward rely upon the results of the enrollment study by Dr. Kendrick, utilizing the "medium growth" methodology. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .248 Middle School .085 Senior High .107 Total .440 Multi -Family Elementary .130 Middle School .049 Senior High .056 Total .235 The student generation factor is based on 1,728 new SFD (Single Family Detached) units built between 2017 and 2021. The student generation factor is based on 1,526 new MF (Multi - Family) units built during the same period. The multi -family units consisted of 1,222 apartment units and 340 townhome units. The District sees an average of 44 students for every 100 single family units that are built and an average of 24 students for every 100 multi -family units that are built. The rate for apartment units is higher than for townhome units. The District sees an average of 29 students for every 100 apartment units. The student generation rate also varies among apartment developments, based on the number of bedrooms in the unit. Units with three plus bedrooms have much higher student generation rates than units that have two or fewer bedrooms. Noting these differences can help the District when planning for future growth from housing. In preparing the 2022-2023 to 2028-2029 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Educational Data Solutions, LLC led by Dr. Les Kendricks, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. Within the district's borders there are several income -based and multi -family housing projects coming on-line in 2022/2023. Once developed with occupancy occurring the District does recognize that the student generation for multi -family housing may impact future Capital Facilities Plan updates. One multi -family project worth noting, Covington Commons which appears to have many units with three -plus bedrooms and is likely to show better student growth than the medium project once completed. 4 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 OCTOBER REPORT 1251 H (HEADCOUNT) ENROLLMENT HISTORY LB = Live E Aber HC Enrollment County Live Births 1 Incr/([ -rgarten /Birth Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Middle School Grade 8 " " Grade 9 Senior High Grade 10 " " Grade 11 " " Grade 12 " " Total Enrollment 2 For 2023 UP - Headcount Enrollment History LB in 2008 I LB in 2009 2013 2 114 25,222 25,057 323 (165) 8.40% 8.34% 2,119 2,090 2,186 2,127 2,055 2,190 1,922 2,070 2,087 1,956 2,008 2,116 2,079 2,023 2,046 2,104 2,121 2,091 2,483 2,428 2,046 2,151 1,873 1,802 1,539 1,576 26,564 26,724 LB in 2010 I LB in 2011 2015 2016 24,514 24,630 (543) 116 8.34% 8.17% 2,045 2,013 2,131 2,067 2,163 2,163 2,176 2,195 2,089 2,195 1,958 2,103 2,058 1,952 1,974 2,021 2,100 2,021 2,093 2,105 2,165 2,099 1,818 1,865 1,742 1,730 26,512 26,529 LB in 2012 I LB in 2013 I LB in 2014 2017 2018 2019 25,032 24,910 25,348 402 (122) 438 8.14% 7.98% 7.93% 2,037 1,989 2,010 2,056 2,061 2,036 2,077 2,008 2,091 2,143 2,043 1,995 2,218 2,118 2,038 2,189 2,169 2,120 2,120 2,184 2,164 1,922 2,044 2,166 2,043 1,882 2,073 2,006 2,004 1,888 2,080 1,946 2,035 1,823 1,732 1,663 1,810 1,654 1,634 26,524 25,834 25,913 LB in 2015 I LB in 2016 2020 2021 25,487 26,011 139 524 6.68% 7.06% 1,703 1,837 1,882 1,768 1,980 1,817 2,001 1,938 1,912 1,924 1,937 1,872 2,024 1,894 2,010 1,925 2,086 1,937 2,006 2,043 1,813 1,959 1,744 1,583 1,484 1,656 24,582 24,153 7.42% 1,875 1,945 1,840 1,887 1,953 1,953 1,962 1,906 1,956 2,011 2,050 1,677 1,467 24,482 Yearly Headcount (48) 160 (212) 17 (5) (690) 79 (1,331) (429) 329 Incr/(Decr) Cumulative Incr/(Decr) (267) (107) (319) (302) (307) (997) (918) (2,249) (2,678) (2,349) Change to Full Day Kindergarten for all schools 1 This number indicates actual births in King County 5 years prior to enrollment year as updated by Washington State Department of Health, Center for Health Statistics. Kent School District percentage based on actual Kindergarten enrollment 5 years later. 2 Enrollment reported to OSPI on Form P-223 generates basic education funding and excludes Early Childhood Special Education ("ECSE" & "B2" or Birth to 2 Preschool Inclusive Education) and excludes College -only Running Start students. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 1 May 2023 5 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX -YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION 2022 - 2028 Enrollment Projections Full Day Kindergarten at all Elem LB in 2017 LB in 2018 LB in 2019 1 LB in 2020 1 LB in 2021 Est LB in 2022 Est. LB in 2023 ACTUAL ENROLLMENT PROJECTED ENROLLMENT October 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 King County Live Births 25,274 24,337 24,090 23,686 23,428 23,583 23,973 (404) (258) 155 390 Incr/(Decr) (213) (937) (247) Kindergarten / Birth % 7.42% 7.49% 7.53% 7.60% 7.60% 7.75% 7.75% FD Kindergarten 1,875 1,824 1,814 1,801 1,781 1,827 1,858 Grade 1 1,945 1,937 1,893 1,902 1,888 1,849 1,897 Grade 2 1,840 1,967 1,960 1,945 1,954 1,930 1,890 Grade 3 1,887 1,871 2,003 2,016 2,000 2,009 1,985 Grade 4 1,953 1,874 1,861 2,012 2,025 2,009 2,018 Grade 5 1,953 1,964 1,887 1,893 2,047 2,060 2,044 Grade 6 1,962 1,995 2,008 1,949 1,955 2,114 2,128 Grade 7 Middle School 1,906 1,939 1,975 2,007 1,948 1,954 2,113 Grade 8 " 1,956 1,903 1,936 1,991 2,024 1,964 1,970 Grade 9 Senior High 2,011 1,993 1,941 1,995 2,051 2,085 2,024 Grade 10 " 2,050 2,009 1,991 1,959 2,013 2,070 2,104 Grade 11 " Grade 12 " 1,677 1,798 1,763 1,765 1,736 1,784 1,834 1,467 1,585 1,691 1,675 1,677 1,649 1,695 Total Enrollment Projection 24,482 24,659 24,723 24,910 25,099 25,304 25,560 Yearly Incr/(Decr) (100) 177 64 187 189 205 256 Yearly Incr/(Decr) % -0.41% 0.72% 0.26% 0.76% 0.76% 0.82% 1.01% Total Enrollment Projection* 24,482 24,659 24,723 24,910 25,099 25,304 25,560 *Does not include iGrad, RS Live births for King County are estimates for year 2022 & 2023 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study Dec '22 ("Medium Growth Model") Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 May 2023 III - Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06.1225 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the District which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower-class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students • Class size ratio for grades K - 3 is planned for an average of 23 students per class, not to exceed 26. • Class size ratio for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 students per class, not to exceed 29. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Students may also be provided with music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: Multilingual Learner Education (MLE) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title 1) — Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) — State Program rN Highly Capable Students — State Program Reading, math or science Labs Dual Language Programs in four elementary schools and one middle school Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10-15 students, depending on the program. Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA. • The average class size ratio for grades 7-8 is 30 students per class and 143 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 150 based on five class periods per day. • The average class size ratio for grades 9-12 is 32 students per class and 153 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 160 based on five class periods per day. Like Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the functional capacity of the permanent school buildings, such as technology labs, performing arts activities, a variety of career and technical education programs, and other specialized programs. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a workspace during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the Kent School District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 95% for secondary schools. Functional capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level. 8 IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent functional capacity to house 33,847 students and interim (portable) capacity to house 4,161. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section III. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity (See Table 3). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 87.8% - 12.2%. The functional capacity is periodically updated for changes in the programs, additional classrooms, and new schools. Functional capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes implemented in the Fall of 2022. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B, and C. Maps of existing schools are included. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: iGrad - Kent School District has developed the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or "iGrad". iGrad is an Open Door (Drop -out Reengagement) School that offers a second plus chance to students aged 16-21 who have dropped out of high school or are at risk of not earning a high school diploma by age 21. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan, because it is served as a leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 250 students. Kent Virtual Academy - The Kent Virtual Academy is open to grades 6-12 and is currently serving 171 students. The virtual school offers a flexible learning experience designed to engage students when and where they work best. Each school day will include a combination of live (synchronous) virtual instruction and on -demand (asynchronous) learning opportunities outside of a traditional bell schedule. Students can attend live virtual lessons with their teachers and classmates, participate in live virtual class or small group discussions, check -in or meet with teachers, watch recorded video lessons, work independently on projects and lessons, participate in learning experiences outside the school setting for credit or to meet competencies. Virtual school students may also attend their boundary school for select classes and services. -11 2022 - 2023 SCHOOL Year ABR ADDRESS Functional Capacity Opened Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 550 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 576 Covington Elementary 2018 CO 25811 156th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 620 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 504 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 626 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 602 Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 490 George T. Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 446 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 602 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191 st Place SE, Kent 98042 564 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 578 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 596 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 550 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 658 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 580 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 522 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 608 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 580 Neely -O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 522 Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 12022 SE 216th Street, Kent, 98031 546 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 642 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 648 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 578 River Ridge Elementary 2021 RR 00000 - 22420 Military Rd S SeaTac, WA 858 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 554 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 600 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 508 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 564 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 578 Elementary TOTAL 16,850 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 1,112 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 922 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 1,154 Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 884 Mill Creek Middle School 2005 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 1,058 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 1,090 Canyon Ridge Middle School 1966 CR 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 0 Middle School TOTAL 6,220 Kent -Meridian High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 2,211 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 2,516 Kentridge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,940 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,608 Senior High TOTAL 10,275 Kent Laboratory Academy 2021 KA 00000 - 208th St Kent, WA 98030 502 Kent Virtual Academy KVA No hard Building i-Grad Program IG Not a KSD Building DISTRICT TOTAL 33,847 10 Kent School District 2022/23 School Year High School Boundaries N Tukwila SeaTac Kentridge High School Maple Va Iley Kent Kent -Meridian High School Kentwood • High School• Co gton Kentlake High School • Lea Hill Auburn 0 2 4 8 Miles I I I I I I I I I King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Legend High School 0 Kentridge High • Buildings School 0 Kent -Meridian Kentwood High High School School Kentlake High School 11 Kent School District 2022/23 School Year Middle School Boundaries Tukwila N Northwood Middle SeaTac School Meeker Middle School Mill Creek Middle School Kent Meridian Middle Scho oI Lea Hill Auburn 0 2 4 8 Miles 0 Cedar Heights Middle School Mattson Middle School Legend Meeker Middle School Meridian Middle School Maple Mattson Valley Middle School ton Cedar Heights Middle School King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Gaimin, SafeGraph, METI/Nf SA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Mill Creek Middle School Northwood Middle School Middle Schools `11165 Kent School District 2022/23 School Year Elementary School Boundaries Tukwila Fairwood •Elementary^' Ridgewood I V Carriage •Elementar Crest • SeaTac Elementary Springbrook Glenr*d e • Elementary Element9ary • E eral Park •EI me tary LakeYoungs Panthertak River Ridge Elementary Soos Cre k • Elementary Elementary lement • Sunrise a kO*ha d Elementar Maple eely0 Bri n El mentar Valley Eleme2ntar ast Hill Elementa y • 1 larlin • Kent Kent Elementary Scenic Hill Elementary • Sortun aniel• ElemV lement ry Millenni m Elements )eadowRi gj lementar • *PineTree Elementa Lea Hill Auburn 0 2 4 8 Miles Ll Crestwood Meridian lementar lementary Covington Ceda Ile), J insCr k•Elem ntary Elementary Elementar Covingt n Horizon Elementary Grass Lake •Elementary Sawyer Woods Elementary • King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Gadmin, SafeGraph, METI/NPISA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Legend Carriage Crest 0 East Hill 0 Horizon 0 Meadow Ridge 0 Park Orchard Scenic Hill Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary J Cedar Valley 0 Emerald Park 0 Jenkins Creek 0 Meridian 0 Pine Tree 0 Soos Creek Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Covington 0 Fairwood 0 Kent 0 Millennium 0 Ridgewood C� Springbrook Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary 0 Crestwood 0 Glenridge 0 Lake Youngs 0 Neely 0 Brien C� River Ridge 0 Sunrise Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Daniel 0 Grass Lake 0 Martin Sortun 0 Panther Lake 0 Sawyer Woods • Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Schools 13 V - Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan In November 2016, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for $252 million. This bonding authority provided for the replacement of Covington Elementary school, which opened in August of 2018, the new River Ridge Elementary school, and our new Kent Laboratory Academy, which both opened in August 2021. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision - makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus stops as well as bus pull-outs and turn- arounds. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified bythe District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4 & Sitemap). Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for the purchase of additional sites, but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements, and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The Board will continue an annual review of standards of service and those decisions will be reflected in each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Our District went out for a Bond Measure in April of 2023 and did not receive enough votes for approval. We are currently re-evaluating district needs and looking at next steps that align with the Strategic Plan which continues to make a priority to revitalize, rejuvenate and rebuild our aging schools as well as begin a process to remove interim classroom portables and find room or create permanent structures to reduce and eventually eliminate the more than 166 portable classrooms in our district. We will continue to determine capacity versus enrollment as well as programs to ensure this goal to reduce and or eliminate all portables in our district is obtained in the next several years. As a part of the planning process, the District has been tracking a few major development projects which have affected enrollment and will continue to increase students' forecasts. On Meeker Street in Kent we have seen several major apartment complexes, ETHOS and Midtown 64 Apartments. These continue to have an impact on enrollment as they fill up their newly built facilities. Alexian Gateway Project is located on the corner of Military Road and Veterans Drive in Kent and will begin occupying its 283 planned units in 2023-2024. In Covington, we are tracking a multi -family house development which has been approved and construction has begun. The 1700-unit Lakepointe Urban Community will fall within our 14 enrollment boundary and proposed completion of Phase 4 is shown to be 2027. Construction in the Kent School District boundaries have been steadily rising over the last four years and planned communities are now being recognized through the planning teams in multiple city and county jurisdictions we serve. 15 §il2 , H. k ;;« \ �e� o / | ��E R LL) 2 O \ : . » V) � C- \ \s \\ NI - E� >_ § m a < w 2 CD �r \ \ {) \ / 0 \ y -06» f; r- 6= m- \ j, m=#� m: m , g \ j �! \) \ , )\ u(�, �(]{�:2( #7 - / ( / \ a! //3aE E& �} j \� -9�� r -! j �:5 j j y- �!� �70s / /\ <_] < -a� �2 � \/q! \\ƒ\))7 � @� u§§E\)\\ �) \)} a)\ z 0- c- c- / \ / /} two k � 0 \ � u � � � � ® I\\\ � \]l) �\ z�\ƒ : � \ � � z w p LLp=Z w Z w t• ,t � t' �f IY iSc�,'� :;,, � .�•.: vZ¢i m ZO � , L ceOz�ag a ¢ ~w u z:w w ZWpw�z �p�=Z¢ �< wp¢r,0 ° ip�Q~¢ -: p�QpZp cz, 'o ZcF=-uw2m2 � F-0w¢><5- w F' VI - Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portables as interim capacity for facilities. Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students more than functional capacity and for program purposes at some school locations (Please see Appendices A, B, Q. Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class sizes, functional capacity, and no need for additional interim capacity, the District anticipates no need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six - year period to ensure capacity requirement (Noted in section V. Six Yr. Planning Construction). During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school -age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District's inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced or when possible, be removed due to life expectancy. The Districts goal is to reduce and or eliminate all portables so we may provide an equitable learning environment for all. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. 19 VII - Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section IV, the functional capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3, the functional capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts (See Tables 5 & 5a-b-c). Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time" to report enrollment for the year. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in the state of Washington. The P-223 Headcount for October 2022 was 24,482 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECSE and college -only Running Start students. In October 2022, there were an additional 877 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. Of these students, 486 attended classes only at the college ("college -only") and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the state. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans to continue to satisfy required capacity through the interim use of portables (See Table 5 and Tables 5 a-b-c). While the district currently shows available capacity to address projected need on a purely statistical basis, there are variety of extenuating factors that need to be considered. The Kent School District currently makes significant use of portables, which we do not consider as part of our permanent standard of service. We have included portable space in our interim capacity figures, and we do not count that as a permanent space solution. Kent is unusual in that it incorporates neighborhoods intersecting with at least 6 municipalities, including Kent, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, Renton, and SeaTac. The district covers 73 square miles and includes over 40 schools. Within this large geographic area, we expect to have pockets of localized capacity need that are not necessarily reflected in the aggregate figures. As one example, the Lakepointe Urban Village development in Covington may require new classroom capacity even as space may exist in schools on the far other end of the district's boundaries. 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR k�23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 al P R O J E C T E D Permanent Functional Capacity 1 33,847 I 34,529 I 34,529 I 34,529 I 34,529 I 34,529 I 34,5' Changes to Permanent Capacity 1 Capacity Increase (F) Additional Permanent Classrooms 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 33,847 34,529 34,529 34,529 34,529 34,529 34,529 Interim Portahle Capacity Elementary Portable Capacity Required 3,240 3,192 3,192 3,192 3,192 3,192 3,192 Middle School Portable Capacity Required 336 308 308 308 308 308 308 Senior High School Portable Capacity Required 654 540 540 540 540 540 540 4,230 4,040 4,040 4,040 4,040 4,040 4,040 Interim Portable Capacity Total TOTAL CAPACITY 38,077 38,569 38,569 38,569 38,569 38,569 38,569 TOTAL ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 1 24,482 24,659 24,723 24,910 25,099 25,304 25,560 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 13,595 13,910 13,846 13,659 13,470 13,265 13,009 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2022 ("Medium Growth Model") Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 May 2023 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS: Grades 9 - 12 SCHOOL YEAR 2022-23 2023-24 1 2024-25 1 2025-26 1 2026-27 1 2027-28 1 2028-29 Actual P R O J E C T E D Senior High Permanent Capacity' 1 10,275 Changes to High School Capacity 1 0 10,097 1 10,097 1 10,097 1 10,097 1 10,097 1 10,097 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Subtotal 10,275 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 Portables Interim Capacity 1 1 654 I 540 I 540 I 540 I 540 I 540 I 540 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 1 10,929 10,637 10,637 1 10,637 1 10,637 1 10,637 10,637 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION s 7,205 7,385 7,386 1 7,394 1 7,477 1 7,588 1 7,657 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 3,724 3,252 3,251 3,243 3,160 3,049 2,980 No Classroom Portables required at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 3 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2022 ("Medium Growth Model") Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C May 2023 22 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL: Grades 7 - 8 2022-23 "Middle School: Grades 6-8 2023-24 and Beyond" 7-8 Middle School Grade 6-8 SCHOOL YEAR G 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 LACtUal022-23 P R O J E C T E D r a d Middle School Permanent Capacity' 6,220 e 7,216 7,216 6 8 2 0 Changes to Middle School Capacity 0 2 0 0 3 Subtotal 6,220 2 7,216 7,216 4 a n 7,216 1 7,216 1 7,216 1 7,216 0 0 0 0 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 Portable Interim Capacity 1 336 d 308 308 ouo 1 308 1 308 1 308 b TOTAL CAPACITY 1 & 3 6,556 e 7,524 7,524 7,524 7,524 7,524 7,524 y 0 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION z 3,862 d 1 5,837 5,919 5,947 5,927 6,032 6,211 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 2,694 1 1 1,687 1,605 1,577 1,597 1,492 1 1,313 No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2022 ("Medium Growth Model") Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B May 2023 23 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY: Grades K - 6 Thru 2022-23 "ELEMENTARY. Grades K - 5 2023-24 and Beyond" K-6 G Elementary Grade K-5 SCHOOL YEAR 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 LACtUal022-23 P R O J E C T E D d Elementary Permanent Capacity' 16,850 e 16,696 I 16,696 16,696 I 16,696 16,696 16,696 K 5 Additional Permanent Classrooms z 0 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 2 Subtotal 16,850 3 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 2 4 Interim Portable Capacity 3,240 n 3,192 I 3,192 I 3,192 I 3,192 I 3,192 3,192 d b TOTAL CAPACITY 112 20,090 19,888 19,888 19,888 19,888 19,888 19,888 e y 0 n d ENROLLMENT/PROJECTIONS 13,415 11,437 11,418 11,569 11,695 11,684 11,692 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 6,675 1 1 8,451 1 8,470 1 8,319 1 8,193 Enrollment & Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools @ 1.0 & exclude ECSE Preschoolers. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Additional classrooms will be placed at schools with the greatest need for aleve overcrowding 3 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2022 ("Medium Growth Model") 196 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A May 2023 24 VIII - Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2022-2023 through 2028-2029. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described below are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which funded the Covington Elementary Replacement School, as well as other infrastructure projects. Impact fees were used at both River Ridge Elementary School and Kent Laboratory Academy projects due to escalation in construction pricing across the Pacific Northwest. According to RCW 82.02.090, the definition of an impact fee is "... a payment of money imposed upon development as a condition of development approval to pay for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development, and that is reasonably related to the new development that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, that is a proportionate share of the cost of the public facilities, and that is used for facilities that reasonably benefit the new development. 'Impact fee' does not include a reasonable permit or application fee." Mitigation or impact fees can be calculated on the basis of "unhoused student need" or "the maintenance of a district's level of service" as related to new residential development. A mitigation/impact fee may be imposed based upon a determination of insufficient existing permanent and/or interim portable school space or to pay for permanent and/or newly acquired interim portable school space previously constructed as a result of growth in the district. A district's School Board must first approve the application of the mitigation or impact fees and, in turn, approval must then be granted by the other general government jurisdictions having responsibility within the district, counties, cities and towns. (Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, SeaTac, and Unincorporated King County) Though the current enrollment projections increase for both elementary and secondary schools are relatively flat, the ongoing need to provide permanent instructional facilities to house students is a driving need as the shifts in our family populations continue, due to ongoing development. Previously collected Impact fees may be used to support and address the challenges related to the number of interim instructional facilities currently in use, the replacement of some of these aged facilities, the maintenance of the district's level of services, and the potential expansions to existing facilities in future years. The Kent School District 2022-2023 CFP update includes continued execution of the 2016 Capital Bond Projects, the 2018 Levy Projects, and the data collection and review of our Facility Assessment Reports. The District Facilities and Capital Planning Teams have come together and joined the Capital 25 Bond Planning Task Force (CBPTF) which included District personnel, design professionals, teaching staff, student voices, as well as community members who collaborated and discussed district needs. Our initial plan revealed priorities including school replacement due to age, and the need for added permanent facilities to (1) reduce and eliminate our need for portables and (2) accommodate future growth as housing in the Kent region continues to expand. We started with a list of 2 billion in needs and through itemizing and prioritizing, we brought the list of essential projects to 495 million. This list was brought before the District's Board of Directors for comments, discussion, and approval. A Capital Bond Measure followed and went out to vote in April 2023 and did not pass with voter approval. We are now re-evaluating needs and figuring out next steps. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will include details of any adopted planning. With the opening of Canyon Ridge Middle School, our sixth grade moving from elementary to middle school, and our boundary change, we are advancing opportunities to even out capacity at each site to accommodate our programs and student -based needs. For the Six -Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Capital Planning Team. Please see pages 13-14 for a summary of the cost basis. Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction estimated costs are based on the last elementary school built in Kent, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost future elementary school, as well as average pricing of nearby school districts recently built new middle and new high school projects. Project Projected Cost New Elementary School $68,000,000 New Middle School $155,000,000 New High School $220,000,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on Appendix B & C result in a zero -dollar impact fee total for this year but may be adjusted if needed per RCW 36.70A.130(2)(b) provision. 26 Ln RT GZ Z � a U yU p� U H Z N Q Z J ILL. O pC o a = W U � N X 7A Z W Y CD Co w o m E N LL N W O f0 (n O O J @ N `o E _ .N t7 N W Cn CD CD a ;9 U 06 CO U O J J p p O O n N p N r N p O N p p CN vi E � u N O U U ID O w CL n N w c O E E v, n U n o ECD a N V N 6 c 3 E N — _m a w a vNi Q 3 C C N �O N O N c 9 O coo 2 @ a N E c o n c a o_ U N U N ,FO U m 'o a N — c CL a, p c y N N NO O LL�O-. @ w N (D @ O O (n a)C co m E N O * o O E coU N A C 0 C N ` O . d W CO v a)0 0 y @ (n N O w N J Y Jcoa _ C d J U n U a is m m LL i LL N II CLc Q LLL.I Q .n � d N 7 LL H 6 } O 2 (6 _N Z w of o. F Z O s o J U W U O -O corn m Z A)c N L O O Q 2-O O a C CL ._.- I1 IL a c y c " CO a $ w ¢ U) U A N H 11 co U U FW- H U Il LL 0 0 N e n R @ a d v o @ a @ U m N_ CD Q m N y N Q E = o m m � H m rn @ d CDw EA > m Q U @ - O 0 U m Q O O O O o ... ss E» E» E» U y a` ° U O o °a E9 U w U � N a m O O O O O O @ O O O O O O p U O O CD cm) cm) CD a z m m 0 0 0 a � a U) N U) _N N _N U) N U) _@ O L _m C U = E N O N @ C W @ o a co O 2 0) m W N N N J m }a Q` rn L a O p � a c @ a N c O p O CO � D' N o Q O N O O m A O. r@-� N a w, LU N 00 O ° in o �° o U U) E U L L _N p O. L `p. 6 O U U U O N L N y @ N y 0 W y ° U) U)L L Q N p N L N c U) N N N O a o 3 o a L `m m m @ ? rn o W In @ ° d m c a @ ° >o o U o W U N w N @ o m N E 0 U) in O O O Ln .N Ln d N C -p O ? N i N O O O ° E O @ L W L co u a Q Z Z U 2 N U) } U) U) O O O d N N N N @ Z Z Z U) U) fn fn fn U) U) (n (n a O L C C xs @ '.9 = m m m m a a a a o T c ELU d o m a d KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi -Family Elementary (Grades K - 6) 0.248 Elementary 0.130 Middle School (Grades 7 - 8) 0.085 Middle School 0.049 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12) 0.107 Senior High 0.056 Total 0.440 Total 0.235 Projected Increased Student Capacity Elementary _ Middle School _ Senior High (Academy) Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) Middle School (required) Senior High (required) New Facility Construction Cost Elementary Middle School Senior High Temporary Facility Square Footage OSPI - Square Footage per Student, see side char 0 Elementary 115 850 Middle School 148 0 Senior High 173 Special Education ?? 12 Average Site Cost / Acre 25 Elementary $161,678 40 Middle School $0 Senior High $0 $68,000,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost $155,000,000 Elementary @ 24 $315,000 $220,000,000 Middle School @ 29 $315,000 Senior High @ 31 $315,000 Elementary 123,702 Middle School 10,256 Senior High 21,296 Total 4.4% 155,254 Permanent Facility Square Footage State Funding Assistance Credit District Funding Assistance Percentage 51.86% Construction Cost Allocation CCA - Cost/sq, Ft. $246.83 Elementary 1,567,594 Middle School 760,483 District Average Assessed Value Senior High/Other 1,077,315 Single Family Residence $653,485 Total 95.6% 3,405,392 Total Facilities Square Footage Elementary 1,691,296 Middle School 770,739 Senior High/Other 1,098,611 Total 3,560,646 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 Dwelling Units 0 District Average Assessed Value Multi -Family Residence $220,293 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 $1.02 Current Rate / 1,000 Tax Rate 0.0010 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Current Bond Interest Rate 3.58% CPI Inflation Factor 5.20% Budget Preparations I OSPI (www.k12.wa.us) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX A) May 2023 29 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity I Student Factor I A 1 (Elementary) 12 $161,678 0 0.248 A 2 (Middle School) 25 $0 850 0.085 $0.00 A 3 (Senior High) 40 $0 0 0.107 Total 77 $161,678 850 0.440 A $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $68,000,000 0 0.248 0.903 B 2 (Middle School) $155,000,000 850 0.085 0.984 $15,252.00 B 3 (Senior High) $220,000,000 0 0.107 0.998 Total $443,000,000 850 0.440 B $15,252.00 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence (Portables) Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $315,000 24 0.248 0.097 $315.74 C 2 (Middle School) $315,000 29 0.085 0.016 $14.77 C 3 (Senior High) $315,000 31 0.107 0.020 $21.75 Total $945,000 84 0.440 C b $352.25 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Construction Cost Allocation SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Assistance % Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $246.83 115 0.5186 0.248 $3,650.73 D 2 (Middle School) $246.83 148 0.5186 0.085 $1,610.32 D 3 (Senior High) $246.83 173 0.5186 0.107 $2,369.52 D $7,630.57 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value (AAV) $653,485 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV) 8.77 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r) 0.10% TC $5,848.83 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 3.58% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap* A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $15,252.00 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $352.25 Subtotal $15,604.25 D = State Match Credit per Residence $7,630.57 TC = Tax Credit per Residence $5,848.83 Subtotal $13,479.40 Total Unfunded Need $2,124.85 50% Developer Fee Obligation $1,062 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) $0 District Adjustment ($1,062) Net Fee Obligation per Residence - Single Family Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX B) May 2023 30 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage I Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity I Student Factor I A 1 (Elementary) 12 $161,678 0 0.13 A 2 (Middle School) 25 $0 850 0.049 $0.00 A 3 (Senior High) 40 $0 0 0.056 Total 77 $161,678 850 0.235 A $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $68,000,000 0 0.13 0.903 B 2 (Middle School) $155,000,000 850 0.049 0.984 $8,792.33 B 3 (Senior High) $220,000,000 0 0.056 0.998 Total $443,000,000 850 0.235 B $8,792.33 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $315,000 24 0.13 0.097 $165.51 C 2 (Middle School) $315,000 29 0.049 0.016 $8.52 C 3 (Senior High) $315,000 31 0.056 0.020 $11.38 Total $945,000 84 0.235 C $185.40 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi -Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Equalization % Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $246.83 115 0.5186 0.13 $1,913.69 D 2 (Middle School) $246.83 148 0.5186 0.049 $928.30 D 3 (Senior High) $246.83 173 0.5186 0.056 $1,240.12 D $4,082.11 Tax Credit per Multi Family Residence Average MF Residential Assessed Value (AAV) $220,293 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV) 8.77 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r) 0.10% TC b $1,971.67 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 3.58% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value 0 10 Dwelling Units 0 FC b 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per Multi -Family Unit $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $8,792.33 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $185.40 Subtotal $8,977.73 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $4,082.11 TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,971.67 Subtotal $6,053.78 Total Unfunded Need $2,923.95 50% Developer Fee Obligation $1,462 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) 0 District Adjustment ($1,462) Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit - Multi -family ($0.00) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX C) May 2023 31 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE I .=_ I ELEMENTARY I MIDDLE SCHOOL & SENIOR HIGH TEMPORARY FACILITIES ,on I 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Map LOCATION 12 256th - Covington (Halleson) 25435 SE 256th, Covington 98042 12a 156th - Covington (Wikstrom) 25847 156th Ave. SE, Covington 98042 Notes: None Projected I Projected %for StatUS Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Additional Capacity Land Use Land Use Designation Type Jurisdiction Rural To be sold King County Rural To be sold King County Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 May 2022 32 o + o OOSZZ 1 �p0 N �P o� '; ■ lK °O FR CIF + <, ro Sry ntl 9ZZ +�i + +1 ILu- + .� o° o o� N MPxwE�L RD"L------ P� S — y OOOZ o E �v 3S AV 9 I Z ■ OOZIZO aoyv N o cO + + "+ + c� I- + u o i e c o .� Y V L 3S AV 80Z\.,, aot e O 3S ntl SOZ R L. �� 69 HWYS AV m n o y 3 Q s V m J c o w Q p 3S V OOZ ssro a_Ei in °' O _+ v. +0096/V,��SFF° a� N emu, �'E' "soy ss1 w ^ 61 S+ nV 9 + w + 3S z"w ■ + W 3S AV Z6 � d�iJ ^b Z61 o y do f..- N QO f6 boo ,�ey� ^ a a dye J00 y oo m Y z 3S AV 881 3S ntl b81 0� v °�i _ o `- t �EL L j¢ w SdV40H1 ��os\RE oDa o + t S 3S - AV■ + C8Em 0�+ a c i O O J 3 I v :N a o d jG�'ca P� O.ZLl o v o °o u a t dO a al m a - -- 3S $ R yy.3 CCU �iR w w L--- x a� ■ r ■ o cD EN V + b9� 3S +A',f +� �''.... iC �,pVING1� ��3S �tl 491 �` f o O = - b91 N N w m i o v ov �� ° � � �-_ Eye � 5E _ ,. 2 i�43 .�a a 009s l N Z �N �•Y0� ��m - - cD m ul '/� �i o m r 3S nV ■ o �J aaa� t ------------- ". ------ � 3s nvY 91 P` ` � e� � w c v' w■3S C d v00006 / bbl nV -S-p A� w. ON g g SOOS C(� J 3sw Dbl -- l._, cl �a o+ e� i OZf'1 i u w ■+ Z E o + µSSA fi- -_ 6� ■ f %' C L' @ �, o _S AV 8Z 1 O S qo 9� W= m y ■ `yam v a ■ c c u p u� (0 " j tGf _ 'a�...... W t o ,:p .y v y L j m H W Z. ■ m'VC� o � bZl E� J N ~ J J _ u m IS Z.I o:�' � Su ntl 3S ntl OZ W l7 u� m w ti m m 'c +Y '3S AV 9il+F w ° 3S+nV 91N_ a w �- y4• 3S AV, b I w o` = N i,c■ :S AVe I m m in ■ 3S -AV C OOBO( SIS - ,v_ o— ` w `o �^ of. ,� . v 3S AV 801 C_ m AV: N o = `w t '� N2S AV' 80 N SOIYw r----; w u 1A e�C �+p-r■ N ,- 3 +m'N�� ->'S AV 601 Hy3. u c' g oU -"'� E3S m AV a6N +00 3S +■ N: a� ©�lE.s' u, S a o ' o � + , + 0000 nv Psi ARN + c ho O S _ O i - 0 2 ■ ntl 96 � o � n _ S V s )8oV1 Sob ioelvi 0076os nvZ6 SoN6 96 oc/e�� u 004/ S AV b o �% �I REEN \� �` �P�� 311VAi 1SV3 g� RD u ° [91 000i OOPR ,. .(CH 1,311VA 1SV3) � a �_ �qOs + AV ONII r yea v 2 O 3 S+ AV b8 + �b c7tla1 3D s S AV 28 S44ntl 09 cn k �rtltl81N33 v,N «.n E s nv Da Ya 'u' 1� ;,N PV boos r ;n o N 1a PV 5�ca -- ,' 009E - - c �Q2s z o - --- S AV ZL 1 u q.n.a�ul -N .c tid my w 5 3 N e _ O 1ST - Opii- J ^ 0099 (ad N i A31�VA 1 3ff) M, AVNGIONIH N + + o�+ 181 +S 02 nv +a9 .o + N �uvF 3 7vr. r yY� W zw y gM )Javd a3 a�v ma _ ■ a�� = U IMH ii3iN3 H �a 069 s�0Q d s o U s S 0�6IV 5 �b Lu s nb �s Ocy �`SSO S AV29 n aal3 o_^'r --'-� stilly \/ J - LLA V .DES M3DV� Ob L rNOsV�� Y o �� APR � >/ :,� ^I Zb b cn s�d1 �� P `;, : cD\6 F yl�-3a o c OC � J o W S AV GeV L))/a0 _ snvz> S °b IIIW a a H s f —ui W3� nv n bFN f/� m Q+ 0ME N a �S ntl Q S N 0 N 4_ I (— - o /abd a nv az 66 j add '— - N s M Cl) IX - Summary of Changes to June 2022 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the June 2022 Plan are summarized here. Capacity changes continue to reflect fluctuations in class size ratio and program changes. Changes in portables ortransitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The District will be moving to a K-5 Elementary and 6-8 Middle School model beginning the 2023-2024 school year. Capacity has been added at the middle school level by reopening the former Sequoia Junior High (now Canyon Ride Middle School). The district worked with Educational Data Solutions, LLC to update student generation factors. The updated rates are included in the body of the Plan. The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools now have Full Day Kindergarten so six -year Kindergarten projections were previously modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all elementary schools. The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called "state matching funds") for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility need will be reviewed in the future. The impact fees for 2024 calendar year will result in no collection of impact fees for both Single -Family and Multi -Family due to the capacity study completed in Spring 2023. 34 X - Appendices Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors Include: ITEM Grade /Type FROM TO Increase/ Comments Decrease Student Generation Factor Elem 0.27 0.248 -0.022 Single Family (SF) MS 0.105 0.085 -0.020 SH 0.075 0.107 0.032 Total 0.45 0.440 -0.010 Decrease Student Generation Factor Elem 0.082 0.130 0.048 Multi -Family (MF) MS 0.035 0.049 0.014 SH 0.029 0.056 0.027 Total 0.146 0.235 0.089 Increase State Funding Assistance Ratios ("State Match") 52.49% 51.86% -0.63% Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance $242.26 $246.83 4.570 Per OSPI Website Link Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $574,784 $653,485 78,701 Per King County AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts. MF $360,790 $220,293 (140,497) Per King county Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $0.93 $1.02 $0.09 Per King Co. Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 2.45% 3.58% 1.13% Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index Impact Fee - Single Family SF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No Change Impact Fee - Multi -Family MF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No Change 35 RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT D 2023 Capital Facilities Plan of Renton School District No. 403 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Renton School District No. 403 Board of Directors Alisa Louie, President Shelby Scovel, Vice President Avanti Bergquist, MD Stefanie McIrvin, Ed. D Justin Booker Damien Pattenaude, Ed. D, Superintendent July 2023 enton SCHOOL DISTRICT SERVICE I EXCELLENCE I EQUITY To Be Adopted by School Board July 12, 2023 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 2023 6-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Annual Update Renton School District No. 403 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. ENROLLMENT TRENDS III. STANDARD OF SERVICE & CAPACITY IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS V. GROWTH RELATED PROJECTS VI. SIX -YEAR FINANCE PLAN VII. IMPACT FEES VIII. APPENDICES Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 2 I. INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Capital Facilities Plan: This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") annual update was prepared by Renton School District (the "District") in compliance with the requirements of the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA, the Act), King County Code Title 21A.43, and applicable ordinances of the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton. It is the district's intent that the Plan be adopted by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton as a sub -element of their respective Capital Facilities Plans, and that that those jurisdictions assess and collect school impact fees on behalf of the district, as empowered by the GMA. This Plan, however, is not intended to be the sole planning instrument developed by the district to determine its capital facility needs. The GMA was adopted by the State legislature in 1990 in response to rapidly increasing development, most notably in King County and the surrounding central Puget Sound area. The Act requires state and local governments to manage Washington's growth by developing and implementing comprehensive land -use and transportation plans, by designating Urban Growth Areas, and by protecting natural resources and environmentally critical areas. The Capital Facilities Plan is one element of a County or City's Comprehensive Plan that addresses existing public facility capacities, forecasts future public facility needs, presents a plan for expanding existing facilities or constructing new facilities to meet those needs, and indicates how those public facility improvements are to be financed. The GMA empowers jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees as one means of financing new public facilities necessitated by private development. This Capital Facilities Plan addresses the impact of growth on public school facilities by examining: 1. anticipated growth of the district's student population over the next six years. 2. the ability of existing and proposed classroom facilities to house those students based on the district's current Standard of Service. 3. the need for additional enrollment or growth driven capital facilities. 4. the method of financing those capital improvements; and 5. calculation of school impact fees based on, among other variables, the number of students generated by recent residential development (student generation factors). Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx This plan is updated annually and submitted to local governments for inclusion as a sub -element in their Capital Facilities Plans. Past Plans have been adopted by King County and the Cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton. The district continues to dialogue with the cities of Tukwila and SeaTac regarding implementation of impact fees within their jurisdictions. The new impact fees calculated and associated with this 2023 CFP, are effective Jan 2024. They are further defined in section VII and in the appendices. IMPACT FEES effective effective Jan 2023 Jan 2024 CHANGE SINGLE-FAMILY $2,911 $2,161 ($750) MULTI -FAMILY 1 $3,697 1 $4,257 1 $560 Overview of the Renton School District: The district is located on the south end of Lake Washington, eleven miles south of Seattle to the west and south of Bellevue to the east. Home to nearly 100,000 people who value working, living, and playing in the Pacific Northwest, Renton has a strong economic base and a favorable business climate. The district spans approximately thirty-two square miles and serves a diverse population of approximately 15,000 students in pre-K through 12th grade at 4 high schools, four middle schools, fifteen elementary schools, and an early childhood learning center. District programs also address the special needs of disabled, academically gifted, and artistically talented students. Four schools (Renton Park Elementary, Hazelwood Elementary, McKnight Middle, and Lindbergh High) are U.S. Department of Education -recognized Blue -Ribbon Schools of Excellence. Community support for Renton schools is strong. School levies, which make up 25% of the district's budget, have been consistently approved by the community for more than 20 years. Voter -approved bond measures or capital facilities levies from 1992 through 2022 have brought exciting improvements in school buildings and support facilities, including the rebuilding of all elementary schools, the remodeling of all middle and high schools, and the recent additional construction of a new elementary school (Sartori) and middle school (Risdon). Voter support has also provided state-of-the-art technology - a must to prepare students for living and working in this leading high-tech region. Every classroom has high-speed Internet connections and ample computer devices for all students. Creating life-long learners is at the heart of Renton School District's instructional goals. Students are encouraged to reach for excellence through a variety of programs that focus on basic academic skills, problem solving, creative and critical thinking, and social and emotional growth. Each year, Renton School District students qualify as National Merit Finalists while the total value of college scholarships earned is in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Elementary level students are well-grounded in science through participation in the Hands-on Science Kit Program, lauded by the National Science Teachers' Association. At the high school level, the district's challenging chemistry program, which provides options for advanced placement college Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 4 credit, has been recognized by the National Science Association, as well as the National Science Foundation. The focus in math is on intensive instruction in the basic skills, supplemented by opportunities to apply developing knowledge to real world problems. The K-12 math program increases student achievement through problem solving, integration of technology, and a rigorous assessment component. Students from elementary to high school levels regularly excel in regional and national mathematics contests. Across all levels and subjects, reading with accuracy and understanding is a primary goal. Elementary students receive a rich exposure to fine literature. Middle and high school students work extensively on reading in the content areas and exploring classic and modern literature works. Reading activities are integrated with a topnotch writing program beginning in kindergarten that provides students with intensive and focused practice for the proficiency in a wide range of language arts skills from creative to business and technical writing. A variety of classes, clubs, and programs give students opportunities to expand their educational horizons and pursue special interests. Choices range from instrumental and music, performing and visual arts, intramurals and athletics, academic -focused and career clubs, and community service opportunities to leadership development programs, business internships, job shadowing, and participation in the annual robotics competition. Special needs students with physical, emotional, and academic disabilities receive individualized attention from skilled teachers. Special education and remedial support are also available and children who are just learning English receive intensive, small -group ESL instruction to supplement their regular classroom learning. Guidance and counseling services are available for primary, middle, and high school students. Intellectually gifted children have many opportunities for extended learning. Operating at two magnet elementary schools and the three middle schools, the Discovery Program offers a challenging curriculum with a special focus on higher level thinking skills. High school students can take advantage of a full range of honors and advanced placement classes. Renton School District staff consistently show a commitment to their most important task - preparing their students for success in work and life. More than 80 percent of certificated staff have five or more years of higher education, and two of every three teachers have advanced degrees in their fields. Several of the district's certificated and classified staff have received the Washington Award for Educational Excellence. Individual teachers have received special honors such as the Christa McAuliffe Award for Excellence in Education, the Outstanding Secondary Science Award, the Washington State High School Social Studies Teacher of the Year Award, and Outstanding College Alumni recognition. Teachers are encouraged to take an active role in promoting their own professional growth through creating and refining curriculum, sharing successful strategies, and looking for new ways to assess student progress. This focus on continuous staff development enables teachers to consistently improve the quality of instruction and prepares them to help students meet rigorous state academic standards. Hundreds of training opportunities are offered to teachers and other staff members each year, ranging from CPR and first aid, technology education, diversity, and crisis intervention to math, science, and reading instruction strategies, assessment techniques, and arts education. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx II. ENROLLMENT TRENDS Over the past year, District enrollment continued to decline. There were differences across the region, however. While King County had a net gain of 370 students, public school enrollment in the four -county region (King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish) is still more 23,000 students less than what it was in October 2019. Renton's decline in enrollment may still be due to the pandemic, but also the continued lower growth rate of immigrant population. Home based instruction also increased in Renton and the surrounding areas. The district will continue to monitor trends, but there are significant conditions that may speak to the potential for enrollment growth in the future. The number of new housing units expected to be developed in the district boundary is larger than what has been experienced in the last decade. Additionally, the most recent economic factors increasing interest rates and inflation appear to be causing a reduction in housing prices, at least in the immediate term. This could drive an influx of new home buyers and new construction in the next few years. Discussion on whether enrollment will return to pre -pandemic levels will continue over the next couple of years with future CFP's. The early learning model in most cases had been through remote delivery methods and returned to partial in -person learning in 2020-2021. The district returned to in -person learning in the 2021-2022 school year, with families still having an option for a virtual program — but it was not highly utilized. Still, the District will not fully understand the ongoing impact of instructional delivery, the current housing market, fuel increases, among others until further into the next couple of school years. Approval by the community of a 2019 bond measure allowed the district to construct a new elementary school (# 16) to accommodate over -enrollment in the K-5 grade span and to provide some elementary capacity relief. Sartori, another new elementary was opened in 2019 as a choice school in the downtown area. Considering the decline in enrollment and the effect of the pandemic, the district chose to supplement the 2020 CFP by further evaluating the enrollment and capacity of the elementary schools located within or near the service areas the new elementary school #16. The conclusion of that analysis reaffirmed the district need for the new elementary school. #16. The new elementary school is scheduled to open this fall (2023) and is discussed later in this Plan. III. STANDARD OF SERVICE & CAPACITY The Renton School District Standard of Service is the standard adopted by the district that identifies the program year, school organizational structure, student/teacher ratios by grade level (considering the requirements of students with special needs), daily class schedule, types of facilities and other factors identified by the district to be beneficial in supporting its educational programs and objectives. The Standard of Service is the major determining factor, together with the number of classrooms (teaching stations), in calculating facility capacity. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx The district has adopted a traditional elementary/middle/high school organizational structure that houses kindergarten through Grade 5 in elementary schools, Grades 6 through 8 in middle schools, and Grades 9 through 12 in high schools. The school -year calendar adopted by the District is also traditional; typically beginning in late August and ending in mid -June. Similarly, the District maintains a common daily schedule, with classes beginning between 7:20 and 9:30 a.m. and ending between 2:03 and 3:10 p.m., depending on grade level. The district, and the Renton Education Association, recognize that reasonable class size is necessary for optimum learning, and have established the following targets in student/teacher ratios: Grade Levels K-1 21:1 Grade Level 2 22:1 Grade Level 3 24:1 Grade Levels 4-12 29:1 The 29:1 ratio at the secondary level applies to all Language Arts, Social Studies, Science, Math, World Languages, World Language Exploratory and Health classes. Other ratios apply as follows: Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 Middle School PE 35:1 High School PE 40:1 All other classes 31:1 For the purposes of this report, student /teacher ratio for special education classes held in self- contained classrooms within comprehensive elementary and secondary facilities is assumed to be 12:1. Educational facilities dedicated solely to special education or other specialized programs are excluded from capacity calculations, as are associated student headcounts. In response to new State and District high school graduation requirements, beginning with the 2018-2019 school year, all District high schools changed from a semester system to a trimester system, resulting in the following: • Three 12-week terms instead of two 18-week terms, • Five 72-minute periods per day instead of six 57-minute periods, and • Reduction of classroom efficiency from 83% to 80%, reducing facility capacity. Beginning with the graduating class of 2020-2021, high school graduation requirements require one additional credit of science (three instead of two), and a total of twenty-four credits; three more than the previously required 21. This has impacted high school capacity, especially Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx regarding science classrooms, where additional classroom space suitable for the various sciences, or the renovation/upgrade of existing classrooms to accommodate the same, will be necessary. The construction of new science classroom addition at Lindbergh High is one such project included in last year's update. It is not included in the he calculation of this year's impact fees or previous year's impact fees. Student/teacher ratios, referenced earlier, are applicable to both permanent and relocatable classrooms. However, since relocatable facilities do not allow for the full range of educational activities promoted by the district, they are generally viewed as temporary or interim housing, necessary to accommodate enrollment fluctuations and development driven enrollment increases, but only until such time as permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. For those reasons, relocatable classrooms capacities are calculated, but not used in the analysis of future facility needs. Practical Capacity Model: The Practical Capacity Model calculates building capacity based on limitations that existing facilities place on enrollment as a result of current educational program needs, operating policy, and contractual restrictions. This is sometimes also referred to School Program Capacity. The calculation is made by reviewing the use of each classroom/teaching station in each facility. For every room housing student, a calculation is made, assigning a maximum number of students per room. Sometimes the capacity of core facilities, such as the cafeteria or gym, or the quantity of restroom fixtures, may limit facility capacity to a level below that calculated by collective classroom capacity levels. This has generally been reviewed at each school level, giving each school leadership team the ability to utilize classrooms in the most efficient manner possible, considering their current enrollment. In future CFP's, we may begin to evaluate and report program capacity more specifically and show the impact on overall capacity. For example, if the school enrollment has a higher number of special ed students in a given year, then there is potential for another full classroom/teaching station to be taken out of capacity inventory, thereby reducing the overall school capacity for that given year. Given that we will be entering into a year with boundary adjustments to accommodate the opening of the new elementary school (Hilltop Heritage ES), the 2024 CFP will be a more appropriate year to provide further analysis of enrollment at each school, overall capacity, and program (practical) capacity. Capacity at the secondary school level is further limited by class scheduling restrictions and student distribution among elective classes. Based on a typical middle school six -period day, where one period is designated for teacher planning, capacity is reduced by one -sixth, or 17 percent, of theoretical capacity. Similarly, at high schools, with the newly established five -period day, capacity is reduced by one -fifth, or 20 percent. Elective classes, many of which require specialized classrooms, also figure into the equation for determining a school's capacity, which together with required classes, require a well thought out Master Schedule if the facility's capacity is to be maximized. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx Current Capacity: Overall building (student) capacity of existing, permanent K-12 facilities, excluding special education facilities and facilities housing alternative learning environments, is 14,788. As mentioned above, the district will begin to look at each school over the next year to better analyze program capacity at each school. When faced with a boundary adjustment this year with the opening of the new elementary school, we learned that the school -student capacity numbers were not completely telling of actual school capacity, when considering each school's population needs. Based on prior enrollment the district has shown a capacity deficit in the 6-8 grade span in the out years; as well as continued, yet smaller deficit in the K-5 grade span. That deficit has transitioned to a surplus with enrollment decline but will also show more of a surplus when the new elementary school opens this. The opening of the new school this fall is allowing for relief at some of the over -crowded schools, but also allowing the district to intentionally have a lower enrollment at a couple of schools where some building improvements are needed before large new developments finish construction and begin to generate students in the area. We continue to note also that that current and future capacity at the elementary level, as documented in this report, is based on the district's current Standard of Service, and does not necessarily reflect aspirational K-3 student/teacher ratios of seventeen students to one teacher. The district continues to make progress towards these requirements, by utilizing available classroom space, added staffing and plans to utilize the new elementary school classrooms to work towards this ratio. Most recent ratios have been anywhere from 17.3 to 19:1 but staffing during covid has slowed the districts progress. Continued efforts will be made with opening of the new elementary school providing more classroom space to progress towards the K-3 standard of 17:1. Elementary school capacity has been the district's greatest challenge. Relying heavily on the use of relocatable classrooms (portables) to accommodate the fluctuating student population, portables at elementary schools account for over 15% of the district's total K — 5 facility capacity. Portables are not considered permanent structures and are therefore not included in the inventory of permanent facilities. They are viewed as a short-term solution for managing enrollment fluctuation, housing students on a temporary or interim basis until permanent facilities can be constructed. Renton School District's capital facilities include both permanent structures and relocatable (interim or portable) classrooms. Permanent facilities are further categorized as either K-12 (traditional elementary, middle, and high school configurations), Special Instructional Use, or Non -instructional Support Facilities. The district's permanent K-12 facilities include 15 (soon to be 16) elementary schools, four middle schools, and four high schools. Two Special Instructional Use facilities house the district's early childhood, special education, and alternative learning programs. Support facilities include the Kohlwes Education Center (admin.), Transportation Center, Facilities Operations and Maintenance Center, Nutrition Services/Warehouse, Renton Memorial Stadium, and the Lindbergh Swimming Pool. Total permanent facilities encompass 2,595,263 square feet, with 2,417,847 square feet (93%) devoted to K-12 and instructional special use. See Appendix A for District Maps. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 0 The district's relocatable K-12 facilities are used primarily to address enrollment fluctuations and to house students on an interim or temporary basis until permanent facilities can be constructed. For those reasons they are not considered a long-term solution for housing students and are not acknowledged in the calculation of the capacity of K-12 facilities. Of the fifty-five relocatable facilities in the district's inventory, forty-four are "double portables" containing two classrooms, and eleven are singles. Combined, they provide the district with a total of ninety-nine relocatable classrooms, encompassing 88,704 square feet of additional space available for instruction. The tables below summarize existing K-12 facility capacity. A complete inventory of District facilities, including undeveloped property follows. Facility capacity worksheets may be found in the appendices. EXISTING FACILITY CAPACITY Facility Type Elementary Schools Middle Schools High Schools Total Permanent 6,895 84.6% 3,435 88.3% 4,458 98.0% 14,788 89.1% Relocatable 1,252 15.4% 457 11.7% 92 2.0% 1,801 10.9% Total 8,147 100% 3,892 100% 4,550 100% 16,589 100% CAPACITY BY SERVICE AREA Facility Type Lindbergh Hazen Renton High Total Elementary Permanent 1843 2423 2075 6341 Relocatable 183 618 451 1252 Total Elem 2026 3041 2526 7593 Middle Permanent 896 1745 794 3435 Relocatable 183 183 91 457 Total Elem 1079 1928 885 3892 High Permanent 1211 1462 1389 4062 Relocatable 92 0 0 92 Total Elem 1303 1462 1389 4154 Grand Total 4408 6431 4800 15639 Does not include Sartori Elementary and Talley High, as they are not associated with a particular service area. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 10 INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF RELOCATEABLE CLASSROOMS Building ID Location Number of Classrooms School ID Numbers Area (sq. ft.) Student Capacity 53 McKnight Middle 2 7/8 1,792 46 54 Nelsen Middle 2 7/8 1,792 46 55 Nelsen Middle 2 5/6 1,792 46 56 Nelsen Middle 2 3/4 1,792 46 57 Nelsen Middle 2 1/2 1,792 46 59 Lindbergh High 1 2 896 21 60 Lindbergh High 1 3 896 21 61 Lindbergh High 1 4 896 21 62 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 2 896 29 64 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 1 896 29 65 Dimmitt Middle 1 3 896 23 66 Dimmitt Middle 1 4 896 23 69 Honey Dew Elementary 2 3A/3B 1,792 58 70 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 3 896 29 72 McKnight Middle 2 3/4 1,792 46 73 Lakeridge Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 74 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 77 McKnight Middle 2 5/6 1,792 46 78 McKnight Middle 2 1/2 1,792 46 79 Dimmitt Middle 2 1/2 1,792 46 80 Honey Dew Elementary 2 2A/2B 1,792 58 81 Cascade Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 82 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 83 Lindbergh High 2 5/6 1,792 42 84 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 85 Dimmitt Middle 1 5 896 23 86 Dimmitt Middle 1 6 896 23 87 Dimmitt Middle 1 7 896 23 88 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 89 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 90 Honey Dew Elementary 2 4A/4B 1,792 58 91 Honey Dew Elementary 2 lA/1B 1,792 58 92 Tiffany Park Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 93 Spring Glen 2 1/3 1,792 46 94 Spring Glen 2 2/4 1,792 46 95 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 2A/2B 1,792 58 96 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 lA/1B 1,792 58 97 Cascade Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 98 Cascade Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 99 Lakeridge Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 100 Lakeridge Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 101 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 3A/3B 1,792 58 102 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 4A/4B 1,792 58 103 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 11 104 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 105 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 106 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 107 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 108 Tiffany Park Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 109 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 110 Hazelwood Elementary 2 lA/1B 1,792 58 ill Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 9/10 1,792 58 112 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 11/12 1,792 58 113 Talbot Hill Elementary 2 lA/lB 1,792 58 114 Talbot Hill Elementary 2 2A/2B 1,792 58 Total 99 88,704 2,669 *Capacity based on Standard of Service and not actual use Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 12 INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF PERMANENT FACILITIES J 0 00 0 0 _ x � U Cn J 0 0 x U U x c� x W U W Ln 0 a a V1 NAME LOCATION AREA ft2 CAPACITY Benson Hill 18665 - 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 67,533 520 Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle, 98178 49,157 338 Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 57,072 332 Cascade 16022 - 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 59,164 467 Hazelwood 7100 - 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, 98056 66,161 591 Highlands 2727 NE 7th St., Renton, 98056 60,000 547 Honey Dew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 54,620 336 Kennydale 1700 NE 28th St., Renton, 98056 65,169 622 Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St., Seattle, 98178 52,958 398 Maplewood Hgts. 130 Jericho Ave., Renton, 98059 56,220 402 Renton Park 16828 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 65,955 476 Sartori 332 Park Ave. N, Srenton, 98057 76,797 554 Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98058 53,992 472 Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Rd., Renton, 98055 57,844 460 Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, 98058 58,758 380 Total Grades K-5 Capacity 901,400 6,895 Dimmitt 12320 - 80th Ave. S, Seattle, 98178 109,070 794 McKnight 2600 NE 12th St., Renton, 98056 126,706 847 Nelsen 2304 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 124,234 896 Risdon 6928 - 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle 98056 136,582 898 Total Grades 6-8 Capacity 496,592 3,435 Hazen 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 327,395 1,462 Lindbergh 16426 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 242,662 1,211 Renton 400 S 2nd St., Renton, 98057 278,373 1,389 Talley 7800 S 132nd St., Renton, 98178 70,831 397 Total Grades 9.11 Capacity 919,261 4,458 TOTAL GRADE LEVELS K-12 2,317,253 14,788 Meadow Crest EEC 1800 Index Ave. NE, Renton, 98056 68,752 464 HOME Program - Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 7,005 84 Renton Academy - Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 24,837 48 Total Instructional Special Use 100,594 596 Total Instructional Facilities 2,417,847 15,384 Facilities Operations Center 7812 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 21,894 Kohlwes Educational Center 300 SW 7th St., Renton, 98057 57,000 Lindbergh Pool 16740 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 13,600 Nutrition Services / Warehouse 409 S Tobin St., Renton 98057 27,466 Renton Memorial Stadium 405 Logan Ave. N, Renton, 98057 37,213 Transportation Center 420 Park Ave. N, Renton, 98057 20,243 Total Support Services 177,416 Total All Permanent Facilities 2,595,263 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 13 RELOCATABLE FACILITY CAPACITY BY SCHOOL* ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Location Address Building ID Area (sq. ft.) Capacity Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle, 98178 88, 89, 109 5,376 174 Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 95, 96, 101, 102 7,168 232 Cascade 16022 - 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 81, 97, 98 5,376 174 Hazelwood 7100 - 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, 98056 110 1,792 58 Honey Dew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 69.80.90.91 7,168 232 Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St., Seattle, 98178 73, 99, 100 5,376 174 Maplewood Heights 130 Jericho Ave., Renton, 98059 84, 103, 104, 105, 111,112 10,752 348 Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98058 74, 82, 106, 107 7,168 232 Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Rd., Renton, 98055 62, 64, 70, 113, 114 6,272 203 Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, 98058 92,108 3,584 116 Elementary School Total Capacity 60,032 1943 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Location Address Building ID Area (sq. ft.) Capacity Dimmitt 12320 - 80th Ave. S, Seattle, 98178 65, 66, 79, 85, 86, 87 6,272 161 McKnight 2600 NE 12th St., Renton, 98056 53, 72, 77, 78 7,168 184 Nelsen 2304 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 54, 55, 56, 57 7,168 184 Middle School Total 20,608 529 HIGH SCHOOLS Location Address Building ID Area (sq. ft.) Capacity Lindbergh 16426 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 59, 60, 61, 83 4,480 105 High School Total 4,480 105 INSTRUCTIONAL SPECIAL USE Area Location Address Building ID (sq. ft.) Capacity 2607 Jones Ave. S, Spring Glen Renton, 98055 93,94 3,584 92 Special Education Total 3,584 92 TOTAL ALL RELOCATABLE 88,704 2669 CLASSROOMS *Capacity based on Standard of Service and not actual use Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 14 UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY Skyway Site S Langston Rd. & 76th Ave. S, Seattle 4.18 Acres Chelan Ave. Site Chelan Ave. NE & NE 12th St., Renton 10.80 Acres* Park Ave. N Site Park Ave. N & N 3rd St., Renton 0.31 Acres Park Ave. N Site Park Ave. N & N 5th Ave., Renton 0.45 Acres *Currently under construction — new Hilltop Heritage Elementary School to open fall 2023 IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Projection Methodology: Numerous methodologies are available for projecting long-term enrollments. The most common method is known as cohort survival which tracks groups of students through the system and adjusts the populations to account for the average year -to- year growth. For example, this year's fourth grade is adjusted based on the average enrollment trend of the past in order to estimate next year's fifth grade enrollment. This calculation method considers the past five years' trends to determine the average adjustment factor for each grade, or cohort. The method works well for all grades except kindergarten, where there is no previous year data. For kindergarten, two methodologies are generally used: A linear extrapolation from the previous five years of kindergarten enrollment, assuming that there is a trend; or, alternatively, a comparison of the kindergarten enrollment to births from five years prior can be used to calculate a "birth-to-k" ratio. For example, kindergarten enrollment in 2019 is divided by the total births in King County in 2014 to produce a birth-to-k ratio. The average ratio for the last five years can then be applied to births in subsequent years to estimate kindergarten enrollment. The cohort survival method has been used by OSPI to predict enrollment for all Districts in the state. In past years, OSPI has used a 6-year cohort average for grades 1-12 and a linear extrapolation method at kindergarten. In 2008, OSPI commissioned a study to evaluate the effectiveness of this method for predicting enrollment. The report recommended the use of the "birth-to-k" method for predicting kindergarten enrollment and the use of a housing adjustment factor for Districts that are likely to be impacted by large numbers of new housing developments. The cohort survival method generally works well for Districts that have a consistent trend of gradual increases or declines in enrollment. It is less reliable in Districts where spikes in demographic trends (especially a marked increase or decrease in new housing) can lead to dramatic swings in enrollment from one year to the next. In addition, the use of the linear extrapolation method at the kindergarten level can result in a distorted trend since it does not consider changes in birth rate trends. Combining cohort survival with other information about births, housing, regional population trends, and even trends in service area and private school enrollment can sometimes provide for a more accurate forecast. For this Plan, the average rollup Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 15 at existing grades was combined with estimates of growth that might be expected from new housing, and assumptions about market share gains or losses that the district is likely to see at certain grade levels. Estimates of housing growth for this model were obtained from building permit information provided by the respective jurisdictions. However, there are many unknowns due to the overall market pause in real estate, rising gas prices, inflation, and some still consider the pandemic to be of concern. The districts response to this was to consider three projections: a low, medium, and high. Due to inflation and rising interest rates, real estate prices are leveling off and decreasing in some neighborhoods. Considering the relative prices seen in Renton as compared to outlying and more expensive suburban area, this could drive a higher -than -expected growth rate. Because the District needs to be as prepared as possible for a higher growth rate, we are monitoring all three scenarios. There is more potential for growth in the K-5 and high school grade span in the outyears and some decline is anticipated in the 6-8 grade span. Projections and Future Capacity: Enrollment projections provided by Educational Data Solutions, LLC indicate continued decline in the elementary grade span over the next couple of years, with a minor decrease in middle school and high school enrollment at varied years, but overall, a relatively flat rate in the big picture. Using the high-level growth chart, overall enrollment in the out -years is projected to grow by about six hundred students spread over all three grades spans, but still does not project we are back to pre -pandemic enrollment levels until after October 2028. The district will continue to monitor development, move-in/move-outs, and trends within the four -county area to better predict enrollment more than two years out. As the District moves past the pandemic and related impacts, there is potential for development growth in the real estate market and for a resurgence of immigrant population with recent political administration changes at the national level. The local jurisdiction is still planning on over 5,000 new residential units in various areas over the next 2-10 years. It is the district's responsibility to monitor these projects, the timing and how the district will be able to respond with appropriate capacity to accommodate instructional delivery. The number of new homes planned for future construction in the District is much higher than the number of permitted units that were built between 2017 and 2021.This may suggest than enrollment losses could be lower in the near terms but could see net gains in the out -years due to growth from new housing. (see past and future housing development in the appendices) Projections show a slight increase in middle school enrollment over the next six years if considering the high growth projections. There are currently no plans to increase middle school capacity, as even with a slight growth, enrollment would still not be back to pre -pandemic levels. Using the same high projection at the high school level, projected enrollment over the next six years will add an additional 185 students. If these projections hold in the near term, this growth could coincide with district plans to replace Renton High School. As part of the voter approved November 2022 bond, funds are provided for both land acquisition and construction of a new Renton High School. The 2024 CFP will address this more completely as the district determines location and construction period. Medium range and high range projections are provided in the appendices. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 16 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH ACTUAL ACTUAL OCT. 2028/29 ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED PROJECTED OCT. OCT. PROJECTED CHANGE CHANGE (%) CHANGE PERCENTAGE 2021/2022 2022/23 HEADCOUNT 2021/22 - 2021/22 to 2022/23 to CHANGE HEADCOUNT HEADCOUNT (high) 2022/23 2022/23 2028/29 2022/23 TO 2028/29 ELEMENTARY 6,745 6,648 7,061 (97.00) (0.01) 413 6.21% MIDDLE 3,451 3,227 3,328 (224.00) (0.06) 101 0.03 HIGH 4,226 4,318 4,503 92 2.18% 185 0.04 other/alt 170 178 194 8 - 16 TOTAL 14,592 14,371 15,086 (221.00) (0.02) 715.00 0.05 V. ENROLLMENT DRIVEN FACILITY NEEDS With the opening of the new Sartori Elementary School in August 2018, the 2017 elementary deficit capacity of 1,244 was dramatically reduced by nearly 40% to 755. With the passage of the 2019 Bond Measure, approved by the voters in November 2019, the District is will be opening its sixteenth elementary school, located in the Hazen High School service area, where the district has experienced the most recent growth in the past decade plus. The new school is scheduled to be completed and opened for the 2023/2024 school year. This new school has been named Hilltop Heritage Elementary School. Enrollment declines since fall 2020 show a loss of students from 7,057 students to 6,732 students in fall 2022. While this helps to balance out enrollment vs. capacity in this current school year, we will see an increase in capacity this fall with the new school opening. However, projections do show growth in this grade span by another 413 students in the out years. At the middle school level, decreased enrollment combined with lower projections show that the district will continue to have a small surplus in the next year. We will continue to monitor, but there are currently no enrollment or growth driven capital facilities projects in the planning stages for middle schools. However, there is discussion for future bond planning, the need to replace both Nelson Middle School and Dimmitt Middle School. Those projects would be reviewed in future bond planning discussions and enrollment growth and projections would be considered at that time. As previously mentioned, the 2022 voter -approved bond allows the district to acquire property and plan for the replacement of Renton High School. This will be both an opportunity to add program capacity to address anticipated and projected growth in the out years, but to also ensure program equity across the high school grade space. The district desires to ensure educational space and opportunity is provided and comparable to what is offered at both Hazen and Lindberg High Schools. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 17 In addition to any discussion around projected permanent facility deficits at the elementary and high school levels, it should be noted that the District is also reaching its maximum limit in providing portable classrooms at its existing sites due to current land use and building code requirements. Although not included in the calculation of potential Impact Fees, the implementation of new relocatable classrooms and/or the relocation of existing ones, remains a viable method of addressing both growth and the shifting of student population, for the short term. Similarly, science classroom additions proposed for Lindbergh High School, as well as other potential high school renovations, additions, or relocations responding to enrollment growth and/or changes in capacity methodology, are not included in the calculation of these fees. Those current projects are more related to program needs and existing enrollment. We have not considered these projects to be added capacity at the high school grade span. The next table compares the current permanent capacity of Renton School District facilities to current and projected enrollment for the next six years. As noted earlier, the district will take a closer look at overall permanent capacity compared to practical or program capacity this next year and will report those findings in the 2024 CFP. SURPLUS / DEFICIT CAPACITY PROJECTIONS' 2023/24 - 2028/29 *22/23 23/24 24/2,925/26 26/27 27/28 28/29 ELEM. **PERMANENT CAPACITY 6,895 7,545 7,545 7,545 7,545 7,545 7,545 K-5 STUDENT ENROLLMENT 6,732 6,680 6,642 6,848 6,957 7,040 7,142 SURPLUS / DEFICIT CAPACITY) 163 865 903 1 697 588 505 403 MIDDLE 6-8 **PERMANENT CAPACITY 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 STUDENT ENROLLMENT 3,301 3,197 3,202 3,375 3,418 3,417 3,407 SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY) 134 238 233 60 17 18 28 HIGH 9.12 **PERMANENT CAPACITY 4,458 4,458 4,458 4,542 4,542 4,542 4,542 STUDENT ENROLLMENT 4,348 4,432 4,470 4,519 4,439 4,482 4,537 SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY) 110 26 (12)1 23 103 1 60 5 1. Does not include relocatable facilities (portables) *current enrollment medium range projection - 23/24 and 24/25 high range projection - 25/26 and beyond **permanent capacity will be adjusted to program capacity in UP 2024 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 18 Capital Construction Plan: For the last six -year period, the district's highest priorities have been to address existing and projected facility capacity deficits, aging infrastructure at secondary schools, and responding to/planning for both growth and program related added capacity. These projects funded by the 2019 bond and impact fees, are projects responding to growth. This has included: • Completion of Hilltop Heritage Elementary school - most of the growth has occurred and relief is needed at some schools in the Hazen High School service area — in the elementary grade -span. • High school additions and/or renovations to create additional science classroom/laboratory space to address changes in State graduation requirements • Planning for replacement of Renton High School, Dimmitt Middle School and/or Nelson Middle School — all aging facilities and potentially impacted by growth • Acquisition of land for future development • Addition and or relocation of relocatable classrooms (interim classroom space known as portables) During the next six years, the district's voter approved bond on the Nov. 8, 2022, election ballot will allow the district to stay on track to make major renovations, replacements, and upgrades to keep our schools in top operating condition, while protecting taxpayer investments in our buildings and helping maintain high property values. Currently, these are not growth generated projects. These include: Safety & Security • Interior door hardware/lock updates • New key system • Main entry video intercoms • Entryway improvements to provide front door line -of -sight for office staff School Improvements • Update seismic and structural systems in older buildings (retrofitting and modification of existing structures to make them more resistant to seismic activity, ground motion, or soil failure) • Improvements and equipment replacement of school Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems • Upgrades to electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems • Upgrades to boilers and domestic hot water heaters Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 19 Purchase Property • Provide for up to forty acres for a Renton High School replacement Build New Renton High School — at a location to be determined • Build a new high school facility for the Renton High School service area, providing a modern learning environment and equitable athletic opportunities for all students The District's intent in structuring its capital improvement program is to maintain a constant level of construction throughout the program period to optimize the utilization of its management capabilities. The District utilizes a combination of in-house project management (Capital Projects Office) and outside management consultants to accomplish this. VI. SIX -YEAR FINANCE PLAN Finance Plan: The primary funding sources for all capital construction projects scheduled over the next six years include 2019 Bond funds, remaining funds from the 2016 capital levy; and school impact fees currently collected by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton throughout 2023, as growth projects that addressed past capacity deficits are completed. Growth driven projects funded by past collected impact fees and 2019 bond funds are nearing completion. The district also has funds from a voter approved bond in November 2023 for $676 million. The majority of those funds will be directed towards land acquisition and the replacement of Renton High School, as previously described. While there could be placement of temporary facilities or portables due to growth over the next six years at various locations, depending upon enrollment growth - the district does not yet know if the replacement of the high school will need to increase capacity due to growth. This project will not begin for 2-3 years, due to the need for land acquisition. If enrollment and projections show additional capacity is needed to accommodate growth, we will evaluate the collection of impact fees at that time. Enrollment driven projects represent only a portion of the district's total capital improvement plan. Estimated expenditures for enrollment driven projects over the duration of this six -year plan are indicated below. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 20 SIX -YEAR FINANCE PLAN - GROWTH DRIVEN PROJECTS Project Estimated Expenditures' ($1,000,000's) Funding ($1,000,000's *2022/2 2023/24 2024125 2025126 2026127 2027128 2028129 Total 2 Secured Jnsecured New Elem. School 60 6 2 68 60 8 Science Classroory 15 5 5 25 25 Land Acquisition 1 21 61 1 1 81 7 1 portables 1 1 1 101 1 101 3 Tota I 1 781 181 1 r 01 101 01 1 101 1 1021 12 1. Estimated expenditures based on total project cost, including hard and soft costs. 2. Secured funding includes 2019 bond monies, and previously collected school impact fees. 3. Unsecured funds include future school impact fees and potential bond initiatives. *2022/23 and prior II. IMPACT FEES Impact Fees: Impact fees were calculated in conformance with King County Council Ordinance 11621, resulting in a decrease in impact fees for single-family of $750.00 per unit — now set at $2161.00, and an increase in impact fees for multi -family of $560.00 per unit — now set at $4,257.00. Student generation factors were generally the same this year, with a slight increase in multi- family — primarily due to the presence of more low-income units and units with multiple bedrooms. Calculations in 2022 included increased construction costs, and while costs have continued to increase, the district has not added additional construction costs into the calculation for 2023. Assessed and taxable values have increased for both single family and multi -family units, as have bond interest rates. The construction of the new elementary school was front funded by the district and was constructed to address growth in the district. The district will continue collection of impact fees to help offset related costs and will be evaluated on an annual basis moving forward. The 2024-25 CFP will review enrollment, projections, and projected growth to determine if any growth -related projects are needed to address potential capacity deficits moving forward in any of the grade spans. The GMA empowers jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees as a means of supplementing the funding of additional public facilities necessitated by enrollment growth from new development. In the case of public schools, impact fees are assessed only on residential new development. To determine an equitable school impact fee throughout unincorporated King County, King County Code 2 1 A was adopted, establishing an impact fee formula that has in turn been adopted by the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton, in their respective enabling ordinances. The formula requires that school districts establish "Student Generation Factors" that estimate the number of students generated by each new single or multi -family residential unit constructed and establish district -specific construction costs that are unique to that district. Refer to appendices for substantiating documentation on Student Generation Factors. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 21 Other factors influencing impact fees include: Site Acquisition Costs - the estimated cost per acre to purchase property. Building Acquisition Cost - the estimated cost to construct facilities unique to the district. Temporary Facility Cost - the estimated cost per classroom to purchase and install a relocatable classroom, including site work and utilities. State Funding Assistance Credit - the amount of funding provided by the State, subject to District eligibility, based on a construction cost allocation and funding assistance percentage established by the State. Tax Credit — Driven by assessed property values, taxation rate, and Bond interest rates. IMPACT FEES effective effective Jan 2023 Jan 2024 CHANGE SINGLE-FAMILY $2,911 1 $2,161 ($750) MULTI -FAMILY $3,697 1 $4,257 $560 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 22 jf Seattle A 3. XIII. APPENDICES L,k. 4,7 RMS— a HES RPE HE FA, Renton Elarne bu V & Pra-K Schools: BHE Benson Hill Elementary Secondary Scheic4s, OfAS 131mmilt. Middle School BME Bryn Mawr Ekwrmntmry HHS FkLven High School GES Cascade Elarnentary LHS LkKb&Fgh High School CHE Campbell Hit Elementary MMS McKnight Middle School Kent seatac HIDE Honeydew Elowmwitory NMS Nelsen MCI* School HE$ Hazlowood Elementary RHS Rardon High School HLE Highlands Elarnantnry RNS F09don Lftldhe School K Co HOE Kennydals, ElawwThary THS Iaikw High Sc1vxA ng untyr� iurcmia LRE 11-slowidoe Elementary PAEC Maeclovmmat Early Learning My Limfts PAHE Maplaiwood Heights ElernsnWry NeywcasUe RAS Ranson Academy of Rerftn RFE Rsnkvi Park Eismantary SAE Sartori Elementary KC UG SHE Slone Heights Elernarriary THE Elernanlery Boundary TPE PerkElemenmry RSD BOUNDARY MAP - MUNICIPALITY OVERLAY Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings \2023.07.08 \2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 23 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITY FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Grades K-1 21:1 Grade 2 22:1 Grade 3 24:1 Grades 4-5 29:1 Scheduling Efficiency 1.00 Program Efficiency 1.00 Permanent Teaching Stations SCHOOL Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Ca BENSON HILL 32 8 3 3 6 4 8 520 BRYN MAWR 25 7 3 5 0 1 9 338 CAMPBELL HILL 25 6 2 6 0 2 9 332 CASCADE 31 7 4 0 7 3 10 467 HAZELWOOD 32 9 4 4 7 2 6 591 HIGHLANDS 32 8 4 3 7 2 8 547 HONEY DEW 22 7 4 4 0 1 6 336 KENNYDALE 33 9 3 5 8 2 6 622 LAKERIDGE 26 6 3 3 4 2 8 398 MAPLEWOOD HGTS. 26 11 5 2 0 2 6 402 RENTON PARK 32 7 3 3 6 2 11 476 SARTORI 32 8 4 4 6 3 7 554 SIERRA HGTS. 29 8 4 3 4 3 7 472 TALBOT HILL 26 8 3 2 6 1 6 460 TIFFANY PARK 27 8 3 3 2 2 9 380 TOTAL 430 109 52 50 63 32 116 6,895 Relocatable Classrooms SCHOOL Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap Total Ca BENSON HILL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520 BRYN MAWR 6 0 0 0 5 0 1 145 483 CAMPBELL HILL 8 0 0 3 5 0 0 217 549 CASCADE 6 0 0 4 0 0 2 96 563 HAZELWOOD 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 591 HIGHLANDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 547 HONEY DEW 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 174 510 KENNYDALE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622 LAKERIDGE 6 0 0 0 1 0 5 29 427 MAPLEWOOD HGTS. 12 0 0 3 9 0 0 333 735 RENTON PARK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 476 SARTORI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 554 SIERRA HGTS. 8 0 0 1 3 0 4 111 583 TALBOT HILL 5 0 0 2 0 1 2 60 520 TIFFANY PARK 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 467 TOTAL 65 0 0 13 32 1 19 1,252 8,147 Permanent Teaching Stations Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 24 LINDBERGH SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap BENSON HILL 32 8 3 3 6 4 8 520 CASCADE 31 7 4 0 7 3 10 467 RENTON PARK 32 7 3 3 6 2 11 476 TIFFANY PARK 27 8 3 3 2 2 9 380 TOTAL 122 30 13 9 21 11 38 1,843 Relocatable Classrooms LINDBERGH SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap Total Ca BENSON HILL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520 CASCADE 6 0 0 4 0 0 2 96 563 RENTON PARK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 476 TIFFANY PARK 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 467 TOTAL 10 0 0 4 3 0 3 183 2,026 Permanent Teaching Stations HAZEN SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Ca HAZELWOOD 32 9 4 4 7 2 6 591 HONEY DEW 22 7 4 4 0 1 6 336 KENNYDALE 33 9 3 5 8 2 6 622 MAPLEWOOD HGTS. 26 11 5 2 0 2 6 402 SIERRA HGTS. 1 29 1 8 4 3 1 4 1 3 7 1 472 TOTAL 1 110 1 27 1 16 1 14 1 12 1 8 1 25 1 1,832 Relocatable Classrooms HAZEN SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap Total Ca HAZELWOOD 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 591 HONEY DEW 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 174 510 KENNYDALE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622 MAPLEWOOD HGTS. 12 0 0 3 9 0 0 333 735 SIERRA HGTS. 8 0 0 1 3 0 4 111 583 TOTAL 1 28 0 0 4 18 0 6 618 2,450 Permanent Teaching Stations RENTON HIGH SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap BRYN MAWR 25 7 3 5 0 1 9 338 CAMPBELL HILL 25 6 2 6 0 2 9 332 HIGHLANDS 32 8 4 3 7 2 8 547 LAKERIDGE 26 6 3 3 4 2 8 398 TALBOT HILL 26 8 3 2 6 1 6 460 TOTAL 109 28 12 14 17 7 31 1,737 Relocatable Classrooms RENTON HIGH SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap Total Ca BRYN MAWR 6 0 0 0 5 0 1 145 483 CAMPBELL HILL 8 0 0 3 5 0 0 217 549 HIGHLANDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 547 LAKERIDGE 6 0 0 0 1 0 5 29 427 TALBOT HILL 5 0 0 2 0 1 2 60 520 TOTAL 19 0 0 5 6 1 7 306 2,043 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 25 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Core Classes 29:1 PE 35:1 Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 SPED 12:1 Other 31:1 Scheduling Efficiency 0.83 Program Efficiency 0.95 Permanent Teaching Stations SCHOOL Total Core PE Band Choir SPED Other Support Ca DIMMIT 41 21 3 1 1 4 5 6 794 MCKNIGHT 41 25 3 1 1 4 5 2 847 NELSEN 52 22 3 1 1 2 9 14 896 RISDON 47 24 3 2 1 7 4 6 898 TOTAL 181 92 12 5 4 17 23 28 3,435 Relocatable Classrooms SCHOOL Total Core SPED Support Cap Total Ca DIMMIT 4 4 0 0 91 885 MCKNIGHT 8 8 0 0 183 1,030 NELSEN 8 8 0 0 183 1,079 RISDON 0 0 0 0 0 898 TOTAL 20 20 0 0 457 3,892 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 26 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Core Classes 29:1 (24:1 Talley) PE 40:1 Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 SPED 12:1 Other 31:1 (24:1 Talley) Scheduling Efficiency 0.80 Program Efficiency 0.90 Permanent Teaching Stations SCHOOL Total Core PE Band Choir SPED Other Support Ca HAZEN 78 44 3 2 1 7 18 3 1,462 LINDBERGH 55 32 3 1 1 6 11 1 1,211 RENTON 68 34 3 1 1 7 16 6 1,389 TALLEY 24 13 1 0 0 1 6 3 397 TOTAL 225 123 10 4 3 21 51 13 4,458 Relocatable Classrooms SCHOOL Total Core SPED Support Cap Total Ca HAZEN 0 0 0 0 0 1,462 LINDBERGH 5 4 1 0 92 1,303 RENTON 0 0 0 0 0 1,389 TALLEY 0 0 0 0 0 397 TOTAL 5 4 1 0 92 4,550 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 27 STUDENT GENERATION RATES (SGR) The formula for determining school impact fees, as established by King County Council Ordinance 11621, requires that school districts provide "student factors based on district records of average actual student generation rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation." The Ordinance also provides that, in the event this information is not available in the District, "data from adjacent districts, districts with similar demographics, or county -wide averages must be used." In years past, the district used average SGR'S from nearby districts. Starting with the 2021 CFP, the district began using its own SGR derived from residential projects with the district. The district used those SGR's again for the 2022 CFP - due to paused construction and covid impacts on enrollment. Student generation rates have been updated this year and are included in impact fee calculations. There is not a significant difference is student generation rates from 2021 generated rates. The multi -family rate is higher at 28 per one hundred vs. 24 per one hundred. This slightly higher rate is likely due to presence of more low-income units and units with multiple bedrooms. STUDENT GENERATION RATES Elementary (K-5) Middle School (6-8) High School (9-12) Total SINGLE-FAMILY 0.146 0.046 0.089 0.281 MULTI -FAMILY 0.146 0.065 0.069 0.280 Renton School District ApartmentiCuplex Bedroom Counts and SGR Breakout Permit Years 2017.2021 4127123 prqect Name Studio Avaya Ridge Apartments 0 Highland Oasis Duplexes (2) 0 JDL Properties Duplex (1) 0 June Leonard Place Apartments" 0 Second & Main Apartments 0 Sunset Court Apartments" 0 Sunset Oaks Apartments" 5 Apartment & Duplex Totals-) 8 I Bed 28 2 Bed 29 3 Bed 17 4 Bed 0 5 Bed 0 Units 74 Students 24 SGR 0.324 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0.000 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0.000 23 20 5 0 0 48 13 0.271 50 36 15 0 0 101 11 0.109 9 1 23 1 18 1 0 1 0 1 50 1 43 0.860 43 1 12 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 60 1 7 0.117 153 1 120 1 61 1 0 1 0 1 338 1 98 8.289 The student generation rate varies among apartment developments, based on whether the units are for low-income residents and based on the number of bedrooms in each unit. These differences can help the district when planning for future growth from housing. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.d0Cx 28 Student Generation Rates by Grade Level and Housing Type Type MFR Subtype MFR Total PermitSublype NumberofUnits Grade Level K-5 Apartment R 339 6 $ Duplex' 9-12 APT & DPLX Student Subtotal4 K-5 140 6-8 Townhouse 9-12 TINN Student Subtotal-> K-5 479 6-8 New MFR 9-12 ALL MFR Student Subtotal4 StudentsPermit Generated 45 - 0.133 25 0.074 28 0.083 0.289 98 25 0.179 6 0.043 5 0.036 36 0.257 70 0.146 31 0.065 33 0.069 134 0.280 SFR New SFR 779 K-5 6 8 114 0.146 36 0.046 9-12 69 0.0$9 SFR Student Subtotal4 219 0.281 SFR Totals4l 219 0.281 Past and Future Housing Development 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 a Permitted Units 2017-2021 ■ MF 479 ■ 5F 779 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx Units in the Pipeline 3209 539 29 Renton Enrollment History Births 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 46ngcounry 24,244 24,899 25,190 25,057 24,514 24,630 25,032 24,910 25,343 25,487 26,011 25,273 KEnrala.% 5.29% 5.09% 5.23% 5.32% 5.14% 5.27% 5.01% 5.11% 4.98% 4.30% 4.29% 4.34% Oct11 Octl2 Oct13 Oct14 Oct15 Oct16 Oct17 Oct18 Oct19 Oct20 Oct21 Oct22 K 1,283 1,267 1,317 1,333 1,261 1,297 1,255 1274 1,263 1,095 1,117 1097 1 1,193 1,284 1,310 1,345 1,396 1,271 1,300 1271 1,248 1,214 1,100 1124 2 1,184 1,220 1,234 1,327 1,355 1,368 1,259 1265 1,207 1,215 1,182 1098 3 1,130 1,131 1,199 1,253 1,296 1,314 1,350 1285 1,225 1,142 1,177 1163 4 1,109 1,098 1,120 1,178 1,244 1,252 1,306 1330 1,256 1,186 1,106 1160 5 1,156 1,096 1,113 1,108 1,170 1,206 1,247 1314 1,286 1,205 1,138 1090 6 1,062 1,126 1,059 1,081 1,092 1,136 1,148 1199 1,246 1,234 1,137 1052 7 1,118 1,087 1,114 1,062 1,087 1,080 1,144 1144 1,175 1,251 1,156 1118 8 1,024 1,105 1,082 1,118 1,054 1,057 1,121 1108 1,125 1,163 1,219 1131 9 1,255 1,148 1,130 1,124 1,131 1,057 1,104 1107 1,118 1,123 1,151 1199 10 1,083 1,144 1,075 1,134 1,119 1,158 1,081 1106 1,133 1,110 1,130 1164 11 987 960 1,029 978 1,015 1,065 1,022 1107 960 992 984 1017 12 843 898 1,049 1046 1038 1,045 1116 1034 931 981 998 968 Total 14,427 14,564 14,831 15,087 15,258 15,306 15,453 15,544 15,173 14,911 14,595 14,381 Change 194 137 267 256 171 48 147 91 -371 -262 -316 -214 % Change 1.4°% 0.9% 1.8% 1.7°% 1.1% 0.3% 1.0°% 0.6% -2.4% -1.7% -2.1% -1.5% K-5 7,055 7,096 7,293 7,544 7,722 7,708 7,717 7,739 7,485 7,057 6,820 6,732 6-8 3,204 3,318 3,255 3,261 3,233 3,273 3,413 3,451 3,546 3,648 3,512 3,301 9-12 4,168 4,150 4,283 4,282 4,303 4,325 4,323 4,354 4,142 4,206 4,263 4,348 Medium Range Projection (Recommended at this time) Projected Births 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 24,337 24,090 23,686 23,428 23,583 23,973 24,428 24,632 24,899 25,178 4.44% 4.53% 4.74% 4.83% 4.83% 4.85% 4.85% 4.85% 4.85% 4.85% Oct23 Oct24 Oct25 Oct26 Oct27 Oct28 Oct29 Oct30 Oct31 Oct32 K 1080 1090 1123 1131 1139 1163 1185 1194 1207 1221 1 1105 1101 1110 1143 1151 1159 1181 1204 1214 1227 2 1108 1102 1098 1107 1139 1147 1153 1175 1197 1207 3 1089 1112 1105 1101 1110 1142 1148 1153 1175 1198 4 1149 1089 1111 1104 1100 1109 1138 1144 1149 1172 5 1147 1148 1089 1111 1104 1100 1107 1136 1141 1147 6 1049 1115 1116 1060 1080 1074 1070 1077 1105 1110 7 1036 1045 1110 1111 1055 1075 1069 1065 1072 1100 8 1111 1042 1050 1114 1115 1060 1080 1074 1070 1076 9 1138 1126 1056 1065 1129 1130 1079 1100 1093 1089 10 1205 1152 1140 1070 1079 1143 1132 1081 1102 1095 11 1065 1111 1063 1052 988 996 1058 1049 1001 1020 12 1024 1081 1127 1079 1068 1004 1015 1078 1068 1020 Total 14,308 14,313 14,298 14,248 14,259 14,304 14,416 14,529 14,595 14,682 Change -73 5 -15 -51 11 45 112 113 66 87 % Chanae -0.5% 0.0% -0.1 % -0.4% 0.1 % 0.3% 0.8% 0.8% 0.5% 0.6% K-5 6,680 6,642 6,636 6,697 6,744 6,820 6,911 7,006 7,084 7,171 6-8 3,197 3,202 3,276 3,285 3,251 3,210 3,220 3,216 3,246 3,286 9-12 4,432 4,470 4,386 4,266 4,264 4,274 4,285 4,308 4,264 4,224 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 30 High Range Projection 2018 2019 24,337 24,090 4.57% 4.62% Projected Births 2020 2021 2022 2023 23,686 23,428 23,583 23,973 4.84% 4.92% 4.92% 4.95% 2024 2025 2026 2027 24,428 24,632 24,899 25,178 4.95% 4.95% 4.95% 4.95% Oct23 Oct24 Oct25 Oct26 Oct27 Oct28 Oct29 Oct30 Oct31 Oct32 K 1113 1112 1146 1154 1161 1186 1208 1218 1232 1245 1 1116 1145 1144 1178 1186 1194 1217 1240 1250 1264 2 1120 1124 1153 1152 1185 1194 1199 1222 1246 1256 3 1100 1134 1139 1168 1167 1200 1206 1212 1235 1259 4 1161 1111 1144 1149 1179 1178 1208 1214 1220 1244 5 1159 1172 1122 1156 1161 1191 1187 1217 1223 1229 6 1060 1138 1150 1103 1135 1140 1170 1166 1196 1202 7 1047 1066 1143 1156 1109 1142 1147 1176 1172 1203 8 1122 1062 1082 1159 1172 1125 1158 1163 1194 1189 9 1149 1149 1088 1108 1187 1200 1157 1191 1196 1227 10 1217 1175 1175 1114 1134 1213 1214 1171 1205 1210 11 1076 1133 1095 1095 1039 1057 1135 1135 1095 1127 12 1035 1103 1161 1122 1123 1066 1088 1168 1169 1127 Total 14,473 14,623 14,742 14,814 14,938 15,086 15,294 15,494 15,632 15,781 Change 92 150 119 71 124 148 208 200 137 149 % Change 0.6% 1.0% 0.8% 0.5% 0.8% 1.0% 1 A% 1.3% 0.9% 1.0% K-5 6,768 6,797 6,848 6,957 7,040 7,142 7,225 7,324 7,406 7,497 6-8 3,229 3,266 3,375 3,418 3,417 3,407 3,475 3,505 3,562 3,593 9-12 4,476 4,560 4,519 4,439 4,482 4,537 4,594 4,665 4,664 4,690 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 31 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATION SITE ACOUISITION COST Facility Site Area [Acres] Cost per Acre Facility Capacity SINGLE FAMILY MULTI -FAMILY SGF COST SGF COST Elementarg 10 650,000 650 0.146 $1,460 0.146 $1,460.00 Middle 0 650 850 0.046 0 0.065 $0.00 High 0 650 1250 0.089 0 0.069 $0.00 TOTAL 1 41.460 I TOTAL 1 *1.460 1 Sr'Hnni r nNSTPI Ir'TinN rngT Facility erm. Z. 01 Tot_ racility Cost 12022 Facility Capacity in in MULTI -FAMILY SGF COST SGF COST Elementar 84.63 58,000,000 650 0.146 $11,026 0.146 $11,026 Middle 88.25V 0 850 0.046 0 0.065 0 High 97.97 0 1250 0.089 0 0.069 0 TOTAL 1 *11,026 I TOTAL 1 *11,026 1 TFmpnnAnV FA ii ITY rnc;T Facility erm_ Z. 01 Tot_ racility Cost 12022 Facility Capacity SINGLE FAMILY MULTI -FAMILY SGF COST SGF COST Elementarg 15.37 0 29 0.146 0 0.146 0 Middle 11.75 0 26 0.046 0 0.065 0 High 2.03 0 26 0.089 sn 0.069 0 TOTAL 1 $0 I TOTAL 1 0 I .■i.-1!J1WW!J Facility Cost Alloc_ per Sq_ Ft_ Sq_ Ft_ per Student Assistance Percentage SINGLE FAMILY MULTI -FAMILY SGF COST SGF COST Elementarg 246.83 90 0.3615 0.148 1172 0.148 1172 Middle 246.83 117 0.3133 0.046 0 0.065 0 High 246.83 130 0.3133 0.089 0 0.069 0 TAX CREDIT [TC] ' AUerage Assessed Value (AAV) Interest Rate for Bonds (i ] Term (t = maximum 10 yrs.) Tax Rate ( r j TC TOTAL FACILITY CREDIT TOTAL FEE 507 DEVELOPER FEE OBLIGATION ' TAX CREDIT (TC) = NPV (net present Ualue) x AAV x r TOTAL 1 (*1.172)1 TOTAL 1 (*1.172)1 SINGLE-FAMILY MULTI -FAMILY 769,979 $308,241 3.5V. 3.58 10 10 0.001096 0.001096 TC TOTAL 8 990 2 798 0 0 4 323 $8,515 2,161 4,257 IMPACT FEE 2,161 4,257 TABLE II where: NPV i0+01 AAV = AUerage assessed Value r = Tax Rate i = Bond Interest Rate as of 0312019 t = Bond Term Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 32 CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN PERMANENT FACILITY CAPACITY (Students) 2022/23 2023/2024 CHANGE Elementary 6,895 6,895 0 Middle 3,435 3,435 (0) High 4,458 4,458 0 Total 14,788 14,788 (0) STUDENT ENROLLMENT (October Headcount) 2021 /22 2022/2023 CHANGE Elementary 6,820 6,732 (88) Middle 3,512 3,301 (211) High 4,263 4,348 85 Total 1 14,595 1 14,381 1 (214) IMPACT FEES Jan 2023 eff. Jan 2024 eff. CHANGE Single -Family 2,911 2,161 (750) Multi -Family 3,697 4,257 560 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS 2022 2023 CHANGE Single -Family Elementary 0.154 0.146 (0.008) Middle 0.065 0.046 (0.019) High 0.062 0.089 0.027 Total 0.282 0.281 (0.001) Multi -Family Elementary 0.137 0.146 0.009 Middle 0.042 0.065 0.023 High 0.060 0.069 0.009 Total 0.240 0.280 0.040 ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEE FACTORS 2022 2023 CHANGE Land Acquisition per Acre 650,000 650,000 0 Temp. Building Acquisition 177,000 177,000 0 State Match Percentage 0.3133 0.3615 0.0482 Ave. Taxed Value - Single 652,512 769,979 117,467 Ave. Taxed Value - Multi 350,337 308,241 (42,096) Bond Interest Rate 2.45% 3.58% 1.13% Tax Rate per $1000 1.09602 1.09602 0.00000 Construction Cost Allocation 246.83 246.83 0 taxed values vs. appraised -mh Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 33 RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT E Renton Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan And Rate Study For Impact Fees REGIONAL FIRE - 01, J CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN -Amended August 2023 WWW.RENTONRFA.COM PROFESSIONALISM • INTEGRITY • LEADERSHIP • LOYALTY • ACCOUNTABILITY • RESPECT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................4 1.1 PURPOSE......................................................................................................................................................4 1.2 CAPITAL PLAN NINGREQUIREM ENTS............................................................................................................4 1.3 DEFINITION OF CAPITAL FACILITIES..............................................................................................................5 1.4 PRINCIPLES GUIDING CAPITAL INVESTMENTS..............................................................................................5 1.5 RRFA HISTORY AND GOVERNANCE...............................................................................................................5 1.6 SERVICE AREA...............................................................................................................................................6 1.7 CURRENT CONDITIONS AND PROJECTED GROWTH......................................................................................7 2.0 INVENTORY OF EXISTING RRFA CAPITAL FACILITIES..................................................................................8 2.1 BUILDING INVENTORY..................................................................................................................................8 2.2 APPARATUS INVENTORY..............................................................................................................................9 3.0 MEASURING FUTURE CAPITAL FACILITY NEEDS.......................................................................................14 3.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE MEASURES....................................................................................................................14 4.0 FORECAST OF FUTURE FACILITY NEEDS, 2024-2029................................................................................. 22 4.1 APPARATUS FACILITY NEEDS......................................................................................................................22 4.2 STATION FACILITY NEEDS............................................................................................................................23 4.3 PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND CAPACITIES OF EXPANDED OR NEW CAPITAL FACILITIES..............................24 5.0 CAPITAL FACILITIES REVENUE ANALYSIS.................................................................................................. 26 5.1 OVERVIEW..................................................................................................................................................26 5.2 FUNDING THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.....................................................................................................26 5.3 ASSUMPTIONS............................................................................................................................................26 5.4 FIRE IMPACT FEES.......................................................................................................................................27 5.5 OPERATING TRANSFERS.............................................................................................................................28 5.6 SIX -YEAR COST AND REVENUE COMPARISON.............................................................................................28 5.7 POLICY OPTIONS AND OTHER FUNDING SOURCES.....................................................................................28 APPENDIX A: AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE............................................................................................................. 29 APPENDIX B: MAJOR REPAIR AND REHABILITATION FOR STATIONS..................................................................... 30 APPENDIX C: FIRE STATION 11 DRIVE TIME (AID UNIT)............................................................................................32 APPENDIX D: FIRE STATION 12-13 DRIVE TIME (LADDERS)....................................................................................... 33 APPENDIX E: FIRE STATION 16/WAREHOUSE PRELIMINARY LAYOUT....................................................................... 34 Back to Top Table of Exhibits Exhibit 1-1. Service Area and Station Locations............................................................................................6 Exhibit 1-2. Service Area Population and Projected Growth.........................................................................7 Exhibit 2-1. Fire Station Inventory.................................................................................................................8 Exhibit 2-2. Engines in RRFA Fleet.................................................................................................................9 Exhibit 2-3. Ariel Ladder Inventory..............................................................................................................10 Exhibit 2-4. Aid Units in RRFA Fleet.............................................................................................................10 Exhibit 2-5. Hazardous Materials Vehicle in RRFA Fleet.............................................................................10 Exhibit 2-6. Brush Trucks in RRFA Fleet.......................................................................................................10 Exhibit 2-7. Command Vehicles in RRFA Fleet..............................................................................................11 Exhibit 2-8. Dive Apparatus in RRFA Fleet....................................................................................................11 Exhibit 2-9. Service Vehicles in RRFA Fleet...................................................................................................11 Exhibit 2-10. Staff Vehicles in RRFA Fleet.....................................................................................................12 Exhibit 2-11. Utility Vehicles in RRFA Fleet...................................................................................................12 Exhibit 2-12. Small Utility Vehicles in RRFA Fleet........................................................................................13 Exhibit 2-13. Other Apparatus/Equipment in RRFA Fleet...........................................................................13 Exhibit 3-1. Total Cost of Response by Land Use Category.........................................................................16 Exhibit 3-2. Response Time Level of Service Standards..............................................................................17 Exhibit 3-3. 2022 Response Time Level of Service Standards for Fire/Other...............................................17 Exhibit 3-4. 2022 Response Time Level of Service Standards for EMS.........................................................17 Exhibit 3-5. City of Renton 2018 PC Rating.................................................................................................18 Exhibit 3-6. Fire Station 11 Ladder with 2.5 Road Mile Radius...................................................................19 Exhibit 3-7. Highlighted City of Renton Planned Development................................................................... 20 Exhibit 4-1. Capital Costs for Apparatus, 2024-2029...................................................................................22 Exhibit 4-2. Capital Facility Costs for Stations, 2024-2029..........................................................................23 Exhibit 4-3. Fire Station 16.......................................................................................................................... 24 Exhibit 5-1. Projected Dedicated Capital Revenues and Costs....................................................................28 Exhibit 5-2. Estimated Capital Facilities Revenues and Costs, YOE.............................................................28 Back to Top 1.0 Introduction li��l��:�l•�� The purpose of this Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is to identify capital facility needs necessary for the Renton Regional Fire Authority (RRFA) to achieve and maintain adopted standards for levels of service concurrent with, or prior to, the impacts of expected development and population growth over the next six years (2024-2029) and is consistent with the land use and transportation elements of the City of Renton (City) and King County comprehensive plans. This CFP also identifies sound fiscal policies and funding resources for implementation. 1.2 CAPITAL PLANNING REQUIREMENTS The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requires that a county's or city's CFP should consist of: a) an inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities; b) a forecast of the future needs for capital facilities; c) the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities; d) a six -year plan to finance capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identified sources of public money for such purposes; and e) a requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of existing needs (RCW 36.70a.070(3)). The GMA requires that all capital facilities have "probable funding" to pay for capital facility needs and that jurisdictions have capital facilities in place and readily available when new development comes in or must be of sufficient capacity when the population grows. The City prepares a CFP element as part of its comprehensive plan. In accordance with the Interlocal Agreement (ILA) in place between the City and the RRFA, the City will incorporate the RRFA's six -year plan for fire and emergency services facilities into its comprehensive plan CFP. That allows the City to impose an impact fee. Impact fees may be collected and spent only for the public facilities addressed by a CFP element of a comprehensive land use plan adopted pursuant to the GMA (RCW 82.02.050 (4)). Levels of service (LOS) are established in the CFP and represent quantifiable measures of capacity. They are minimum standards established by the RRFA to provide capital facilities and services to the RRFA service area at a certain level of quality and within the financial capacity of the RRFA. As the population grows, it is expected that demands for fire and emergency response services will also grow. Additional facilities will be necessary to meet this growing demand for service. LOS standards are influenced by local citizens, elected, and appointed officials, national and state standards, mandates, and other considerations, such as available funding. Growth, LOS standards, and a funded capital improvement program are to be in balance. In the case where the LOS cannot be met by a service or facility, the jurisdiction could do one of the Capital Facilities Plan 4 Back to Top following: 1) add proposed facilities within funding resources, 2) reduce demand through demand management strategies, 3) lower LOS standards, 4) phase growth, or 5) change the land use plan. 1.3 DEFINITION OF CAPITAL FACILITIES The CFP addresses public facilities necessary for providing fire and emergency response services. Capital facilities generally have a long useful life and include RRFA-owned and/or -operated buildings, land, equipment, and apparatus. Capital facilities planning does not cover regular operation and maintenance, but it does include major repair, rehabilitation, or reconstruction of facilities. The RRFA considers capital assets to be assets of more than $5,000 in value and an estimated useful life of more than one year. 1.4 PRINCIPLES GUIDING CAPITAL INVESTMENTS There are two main guiding elements behind capital facilities planning: RRFA standard operating procedures (SOP) that define fiscal policies and the GMA. RRFA SOP 2315 "Reserve Funds" and SOP 2317 "Long -Term Planning" address the RRFA's policies regarding capital reserves and investments. The CFP supports RRFA in making strategic capital investments that support this effort. RRFA intends to use the CFP as: ■ a tool for budgeting; ■ the basis for capital spending, giving a degree of assurance about how public money will be spent; and ■ a useful guidance document for leadership and staff. Toward that end, RRFA has developed and used the following guidelines to evaluate projects before adding them to the CFP: ■ Growth -related project costs should be timed to match with available remitted fire impact fee revenues. ■ Project costs that are not growth -related should be timed to match with revenues available through operating transfers. ■ Projects should be spaced to allow for progress on RRFA's other financial goals, especially maintaining its capital and operating reserves. 1.5 RRFA HISTORY AND GOVERNANCE RRFA is a special purpose district that provides fire and medical emergency response services within the City and King County Fire District 25 (KCFD25). The RRFA was established on July 1, 2016, after voters residing within KCFD25 and the City approved Proposition 1. This legislation Capital Facilities Plan 5 Back to Top formed the regional fire authority and authorized a fire benefit charge. Prior to the creation of the RRFA, service in the City was provided by Renton Fire & Emergency Services (RF&ES) and both KCFD25 and King County Fire District 40 (KCFD40) contracted for services with the City. Creation of the RRFA consolidated fire protection for the City and KCFD25 under a single special local government authority. The contract for fire protection with KCFD40 remained in place and transferred to RRFA and was renewed in 2022 for an additional twenty years. Accordingly, KCFD40 is treated as part of the RRFA entity for the purposes of this CFP. 1.6 SERVICE AREA RRFA is located at the south end of Lake Washington, between Seattle and Tacoma. According to King County GIS data, the RRFA's total response area is 37 square miles, including the City of Renton and KCFD25 (27 square miles) and the KCFD40 and Lake Youngs area (10 square miles). KCFD25 is located in the area east of the City and north of State Route 169 known as the East Renton Highlands. KCFD40 and Lake Youngs are located in the area east of the City and south of State Route 169 known as Fairwood. The RRFA service area is bordered by unincorporated areas of King County, as well as the cities of Kent, Tukwila, and Newcastle, with the City of Seattle just a few miles northwest. Exhibit 1-1 presents a map of the RRFA service area and station locations. Exhibit 1-1. Service Area and Station Locations Capital Facilities Plan 6 Back to Top 1.7 CURRENT CONDITIONS AND PROJECTED GROWTH Renton is the fourth largest city in King County, covering 23.54 square miles and having an estimated 2022 population of 107,900. The City includes residential neighborhoods, a strong industrial base, and a growing commercial/office sector. The City's downtown and northern manufacturing area were designated as a regional growth center by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) in 1995. The northern part of the regional growth center borders Lake Washington and emphasizes mixed use and regional employment, including the Boeing Company's Renton Plant and The Landing, a significant recent retail and residential development. The southern part of the regional growth center includes the downtown core and adjacent residential area. Downtown Renton has seen investment in recent years, including the Renton Pavilion Event Center and Piazza Park, the Renton Transit Center, the IKEA Performing Arts Center, Top Golf, the Hyatt, and Southport. The City also contains commercial corridors, multi -family nodes, and extensive single-family neighborhoods. KCFD25 and KCFD40 mostly contain residential areas located in King County outside of Renton city limits. Population projections for Renton, KCFD25, and KCFD40 for the years 2023-2029 are presented in Exhibit 1-2.1 The City is expected to grow by 6,053 residents, 86% of the total population growth forecasted for the RRFA service area. Exhibit 1-2. Service Area Population and Projected Growth Description 2022 Projected Growth 2023-2029 City of Renton 107,900 6,053 ......... ..................................................................................................................................................................................... KCFD25 7,947 87 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .................. KCFD40 22,148 917 Total Service Area 137,995 City of Renton Share of Population Growth 1 Source: Projections provided by the City of Renton. 7,057 86% Capital Facilities Plan 7 Back to Top 2.0 Inventory of Existing RRFA Capital Facilities This section provides a current inventory of capital facilities that are either owned or operated by RRFA, including both stations and apparatus. 2.1 BUILDING INVENTORY Exhibit 1-1 in Section 1 maps the locations and ownership of the seven fire stations operated by RRFA. Exhibit 2-1 provides station locations and square footage operated by RRFA. Exhibit 2-1. Fire Station Inventory Building Square Station Address I Footage Operated by RRFA Fire Station 112 211 Mill Ave S, Renton, WA 98057 20,550 Fire Station 12 (Ex E0Q 3 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1209 Kirkland Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 14,800 Fire Station 13 18002 108th Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 20,521 Fire Station 13 Shop ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18002 108th Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 6,000 Fire Station 14 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1900 Lind Ave SW, Renton, WA 98057 13,659 Fire Station 14 Tower ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1900 Lind Ave SW, Renton, WA 98057 3,658 Fire Station 15 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1404 N 30th St., Renton, WA 98056 7,497 Fire Station 16 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12923 156th Ave SE, Renton, WA 98059 7,732 Fire Station 174 14810 Petrovitsky Rd SE, Renton, WA 98058 6,836 2 Fire Station 11 is owned by the City of Renton and leased to RRFA. The building square footage excludes the area leased by KC Medics. 3 Fire Station 12 is owned by the City of Renton and leased to the RRFA. The building square footage excludes the portion of the building that is utilized by City of Renton Emergency Management. 4 Fire Station 17 is owned by Fire District 40 and used by RRFA through service contract. Capital Facilities Plan 8 Back to Too 2.2 APPARATUS INVENTORY The RRFA maintains a wide variety of highly specialized apparatus in order to fulfill its mission to protect the community it serves. Inventories of RRFA engines, ladders, aid units, hazardous materials vehicles, brush trucks, command vehicles, dive apparatus, service vehicles, staff vehicles, utility vehicles, small utility vehicles, and other apparatus/equipment are shown in Exhibits 2-2 through 2-13. Exhibit 2-2. Engines in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Call Station/ Replacement Est. Cost in Number Sign Division Year Make Model Year Year of Assignment Replacement F074 E413 Station 13 1999 E-One Cyclone II not scheduled $0 ..............................................................................................................._.........................................................._......................................._.........................................................._.................................................... F085 E414 Station 14 2005 E-One Cyclone II 2025 $1,103,258 ..............................................................................................................._.........................................................._......................................._.........................................................._.................................................... F093 E412 Station 12 2008 E-One Cyclone II 2025 $1,103,258 ..............................................................................................................._..........................._.............................._......................................._.........................................................._.................................................... F114 E313 Station 13 2015 E-One Cyclone II 2031 $1,317,348 ..............................................................................................................._..........................._.............................._......................................._.........................................................._.................................................... F115 E314 Station 14 2015 E-One Cyclone II 2031 $1,317,348 ..............................................................................................................._.........................................................._......................................._.........................................................._.................................................... F123 E311 Station 11 2017 E-One Cyclone II 2033 $1,397,574 ..............................................................................................................._..........................._.............................._......................................._.........................................................._.................................................... F124 E312 Station 12 2017 E-One Cyclone II 2033 $1,397,574 ..............................................................................................................._..........................._.............................._......................................._.........................................................._.................................................... F137 E316 Station 16 2019 E-One Cyclone II 2035 $1,482,687 F148 E313 Station 13 2022 Pierce Enforcer 2038 $1,620,172 ..............................................................................................................._..........................._.............................._......................................._.........................................................._.................................................... F149 E314 Station 14 2022 Pierce Enforcer 2038 $1,620,172 ..............................................................................................................._.........................................................._......................................._.........................................................._.................................................... F2515 E316 Station 16 2003 E-One Cyclone II 2025 $1,103,258 ..............................................................................................................._.........................................................._......................................._.........................................................._.................................................... F441 E417 Station 17 2022 Pierce Enforcer 2038 $1,620,172 Capital Facilities Plan 9 Back to Too Exhibit 2-3. Ariel Ladder Inventory Vehicle Call Station/Division Replacement Est. Cost in Year Number Sign Assignment Year of Replacement F105 L311 Station 11 2011 E-One Aerial 2029 $2,591,449 ............................................................. F135 L311 .... ......... .......... ........ ........ Station 11 2019 E-One Cyclone ....................................................... 2037 $3,282,770 Exhibit 2-4. Aid Units in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Number Call Sign Station/Division Assignment Year Make Model Replacement Year Est. Cost in Year of Replacement F110 A313 Station 13 2014 INTE Northstar 2025 $421,371 ............................................................_....................................................................................._...................................................................._...................................................._.................................................... F111 A312 Station 12 2014 INTE Northstar 2025 $421,371 ............................................................_....................................................................................._..........................._........................................_...................................................._.................................................... F138 A311 Station 11 2020 Ford F-450 2032 $518,233 ............................................................_....................................................................................._..........................._........................................_...................................................._.................................................... F153 A313 Station 13 2022 Ford F-450 2034 $549,793 ............................................................_....................................................................................._..........................._........................................_...................................................._.................................................... F154 A312 Station 12 2022 Ford F-450 2034 $549,793 ............................................................ F440 _ A317 ......................................................................................... Station 17 2022 ........................................................................................................................................................................... Ford F-450 2034 $549,793 Exhibit 2-5. Hazardous Materials Vehicle in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Station/Division Replacement Est. Cost in Year Number Call Sign Assignment Year Make Model Year of Replacement F120 HM314 Station 14 2017 E-One Freightliner 2037 $826,618 Exhibit 2-6. Brush Trucks in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Station/ Division Replacement Est. Cost in Year Number Call Sign Assignment Year Make Model Year of Replacement F091 BR317 Station 17 2008 Ford F-550 2024 $354,413 ................................................................................................................................................................................_.........................................._....................................................................................................... F155 BR316 Station 16 2022 Ford F-550 2037 $520,467 Capital Facilities Plan 10 Back to Too Exhibit 2-7. Command Vehicles in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Call Sign Station/Division Year Make Model Replacement Est. Cost in Year Number Assignment Year of Replacement F109 B413 Station 13 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe 2023 $111,202 ..............................................................................................................._......................._...................................._......................_______ F119 B312 Station 12 2016 Chevrolet ................._........................................._................................................... Silverado 2024 $114,538 ..............................................................................................................._......................._...................................._......................................................_........................................._................................................... F121 C312 Station 13 2017 Chevrolet Tahoe 2027 $125,159 ..............................................................................................................._......................._...................................._......................................................_........................................._................................................... F122 C314 Station 13 2017 Ford Explorer 2027 $125,159 ..............................................................................................................._......................._...................................._......................................................_........................................._................................................... F125 B313 Station 13 2018 Chevrolet Silverado 2028 $128,914 ..............................................................................................................._......................._...................................._......................................................_........................................._................................................... F134 C313 Station 13 2020 Ford Explorer 2030 $136,764 ..............................................................................................................._......................._...................................._......................................................_........................................._................................................... F139 C311 Station 13 2020 Ford Explorer 2030 $136,764 ..............................................................................................................._......................._...................................._......................................................_........................................._................................................... F156 TBD Station 11 2023 Chevrolet Silverado 2033 $149,446 ..............................................................................................................._......................._...................................._......................................................_............................................................................................. F158 TBD Station 12 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 2034 $153,930 Exhibit 2-8. Dive Apparatus in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Station/Division Replacement Est. Cost in Year Number Call Sign Assignment Year Make Model Year of Replacement F129 DIV312 Station 12 2018 Ram 5500 2039 $443,087 Exhibit 2-9. Service Vehicles in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Call Station/Division Replacement Est. Cost in Year Number Sign Assignment Year Make Model Year of Replacement F136 CAR312 EMS 2019 Ford F-150 Pursuit 2029 $110,086 ................................ F434 ........................................................................................................... CAR52 EMS _...................................._...................................................._.........................................._................................................. 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe 2023 $92,195 Capital Facilities Plan 11 Back to Too Exhibit 2-10. Staff Vehicles in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Call Station/Division Year Make Model Replacement Est. Cost in Year Number Sign Assignment Year of Replacement F096A N/A OFM 2009 Ford Escape 2024 $39,035 .................... F104 .................... N/A ........................... ____............................_................................................_............................ EMS 2012 Ford ..................._............................................._....................................................... Escape 2027 $42,655 ................................ F116 .................... N/A .................................................................................................................. Administration 2016 _ Ford .................................................................................................. Police Utility 2030 ........................................................ $46,610 ................................ F117 .................... N/A .................................................................................................................. OFM 2015 _ Ford .................................................................................................. C-Max 2030 ........................................................ $46,610 ................................ F126 ................................ .................... N/A .................... .................................................................................................................. OFM .................................................................................................................. 2018 _ Ford _ .................................................................................................. Escape .................................................................................................. 2033 ........................................................ $50,932 ........................................................ F127 ...................................................._................................................................_......................................................................................................_............................................._....................................................... N/A OFM 2018 Ford Escape 2033 $50,932 F128 ................................ N/A .................... OFM .................................................................................................................. 2018 Ford _ Escape .................................................................................................. 2033 $50,932 ........................................................ F130 ................................ N/A .................... OFM .................................................................................................................. 2020 Ford _ Escape .................................................................................................. 2035 $54,033 ........................................................ F143 N/A OFM 2020 Ford Escape 2035 $54,033 ................................ F144 ................................ .................... N/A .................... .................................................................................................................. OFM .................................................................................................................. 2020 _ Ford _ .................................................................................................. Escape .................................................................................................. 2035 ........................................................ $54,033 ........................................................ F145 N/A Support Services 2020 Ford Escape 2035 $54,033 ................................ F146 ................................ .................... N/A .................... .................................................................................................................. Support Services .................................................................................................................. 2020 _ Ford _ .................................................................................................. Escape .................................................................................................. 2035 ........................................................ $54,033 ........................................................ F147 N/A Support Services 2020 Ford Escape 2035 $54,033 Exhibit 2-11. Utility Vehicles in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Call Station/Division EMP Replacement Est. Cost in Number Sign Assignment Year Make Model Year Year of Replacement F112 N/A SKCFTC 2015 Ford F-250 2030 $85,978 ............................... ..................... F113 N/A ........................................................................................ OFM _....................................... 2015 Dodge _................................................. Promaster _.......................................................................................... 2030 $85,978 ............................... ..................... F132 N/A ........................................................................................ Support Services _....................................... 2019 Ford _................................................. F-250 _.......................................................................................... 2034 $96,769 ............................................................................................................................................_......................................._.................................................._.............. F133 ............................... ..................... N/A Support Services ........................................................................................ 2019 _....................................... Ford F-250 _................................................. ................................................................. 2034 _.......................................................................................... $96,769 F140 N/A Administration 2020 Chevrolet ss Express 2035 $99,672 .......................... _.................... _....................................................................................... _......................................._................................................. . F151 N/A SKCFTC 2021 Ford F-150 2036 $102,662 .......................... F152 _.................... N/A _....................................................................................... SKCFTC 2021 _......................................._................................................. Ford _.......................................................................................... F-150 2036 $102,662 .......................... F159 _.................... N/A _....................................................................................... Support Services 2024 _......................................._................................................. Chevrolet _.......................................................................................... Silverado 2039 $112,182 .........................._...................._......................................................................................._......................................._................................................._............................................_............................................. F436 N/A Support Services 2005 Chevrolet Silverado 2023 $69,908 Capital Facilities Plan 12 Back to Too Exhibit 2-12. Small Utility Vehicles in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Call Station/Division Replacement Est. Cost in Year Number Sign Assignment Year Make Model Year of Replacement F131 N/A Station 14 2020 Ford Transit Connect 2035 $60,022 ............................................................................................................................................................................... F141 N/A Station 13 2020 Nissan .............._............................................_....................___ NV200 S 2035 ...................... $60,022 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... F142 N/A Station 13 2020 Nissan NV200 S 2035 $60,022 Exhibit 2-13. Other Apparatus/Equipment in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Number Call Sign Station/Division Assignment Year Make Model Replacement Year Est. Cost in Year of Replacement F092 ................................................... N/A N/A _.............................................................................................................. 2007 Cargo _.............................................................................................................................................................. Trailer 22Ft not scheduled $0 F094 N/A N/A 2008 Eagle Utility not scheduled $0 ................................................... F101 N/A _.............................................................................................................. N/A 2008 _.............................................................................................................................................................. Club Inteltrak not scheduled $0 ................................................... F103 N/A _.............................................................................................................. N/A 2008 _.............................................................................................................................................................. PLRS Spirit 2025 $100,394 .................................................... F118 N/A _............................................................................ N/A ................................. 2016 _ EZLD ................... ........................................................................_................................................. Trailer 2026 $17,727 .................................................... F150 N/A _.............................................................................................................. N/A 2005 _.............................................................................................................................................................. CGMT Trailblazer 2025 $17,210 Capital Facilities Plan 13 Back to Too 3.0 Measuring Future Capital Facility Needs The GMA was enacted to provide local oversight of community growth with the intent for local governments such as counties, cities, and towns to monitor and mitigate the impacts of growth. GMA Goal 1 promotes placing growth in urban areas where there are public facilities and services, while GMA Goal 12 promotes adequate facilities and services to support development: (1) Urban growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. (12) Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards (RCW 36.70A.020(12)). Concurrency for transportation infrastructure is mandated by the GMA, and local agencies were given the authority to establish concurrency guidelines for other public needs such as water, sewer, and fire services: Purpose. ■ The purpose of concurrency is to assure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development are adequate to serve that development at the time it is available for occupancy and use, without decreasing service levels below locally established minimum standards. ■ Concurrency describes the situation in which adequate facilities are available when the impacts of development occur, or within a specified time thereafter. Concurrency ensures consistency in land use approval and the development of adequate public facilities as plans are implemented, and it prevents development that is inconsistent with the public facilities necessary to support the development. ■ With respect to facilities other than transportation facilities, counties and cities may fashion their own regulatory responses and are not limited to imposing moratoria on development during periods when Concurrency is not maintained (WAC 365-196-840). The RRFA CFP identifies the need for $25.5M in capital investments as shown in Exhibits 4-1 and 4-2, to maintain fire service concurrency through the year 2029. 3.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE MEASURES RRFA measures LOS from three different perspectives. The first concerns the cost of facilities for Capital Facilities Plan 14 Back to Top incident response per unit of development. The second perspective concerns turnout and response times in accordance with established policy. The third perspective concerns the Protection Class (PC) rating for each of the areas served (the City of Renton, KCFD25, and KDFD40). Each of these LOS measures are described below. 3.1.1 Cost of Facilities for Incident Response per Unit of Development In 2023, RRFA conducted a rate study for fire impact fees. That study presents a methodology for quantifying the need for fire and EMS stations and apparatus to serve new growth, for the purpose of collecting fire impact fees. The level of service standard is the 2022 ratio of apparatus and stations to EMS and fire/other incidents. More specifically, the rate study calculates the annualized facility value per incident as well as the number of incidents produced by different kinds of development. This determines the total cost of facilities for incident response needed per unit of development. This standard is used to measure the systemwide capacity of facilities to support incident response throughout the RRFA service area. Full documentation of the methodology is available in the rate study. A brief summary follows. For apparatus, including engines and other response vehicles, the ratio of apparatus to incidents as of 2022 was selected as an acceptable LOS standard. As growth occurs, more incidents will occur, and therefore more apparatus will be needed to maintain this standard. It is anticipated that much of the growth in the RRFA service area will come in the form of infill development and increased density within the City. As the growth occurs, the RRFA intends to add additional apparatus units to address the anticipated increase in multi -story housing (ladder) and emergency medical calls for service (aid unit). For fire stations, the rate study measures LOS using the ratio of station square footage to incidents. However, a deduction to the station square footage is made to account for unused beds that could accommodate additional fire and emergency response staff. As stated above, it is anticipated that much of the growth in the RRFA service area will come in the form of infill development and increased density within the City. As this growth occurs, the RRFA intends to utilize excess bed capacity in current stations to increase its capacity for emergency response at existing stations. On the next page, Exhibit 3-1 shows the cost of response per unit of development (dwelling unit, square foot, room, or student), by land use category, as calculated in the 2023 RRFA Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees. These represent the total amount of facility investment the RRFA would need to make to maintain the current level of service as growth occurs within the service area, but not the actual fire impact fee to be charged. Capital Facilities Plan 15 Back to Top Exhibit 3-1. Total Cost of Response by Land Use Category Land Use Type Single -Family Residential ....................................................................................... Multi -Family Residential ....................................................................................... Hotel/Motel/Resort Medical Care Facility ..................................................................................... Office ..................................................................................... Medical/Dental Office Retail ................................................................................... Leisure Facilities .................................................................................... Restaurant/Lounge .................................................................................... Industrial/Manufacturing Church/Non-Profit .................................................................................... Education Unit of Development d.u. d.u. room .......................... bed .......................... sq. ft. .......................... sq. ft. sq. ft. .......................... sq. ft. .......................... sq. ft. .......................... sq. ft. sq. ft. .......................... student Special Public Facilities sq. ft. 3.1.2 Turnout and Response Time Standards Total Cost of Response to EMS, Fire, & Other Incidents, Per Unit of Development $1,209.66 ................................ $722.82 ................................ $2,196.29 ................................ $0.29 ................................ $1.28 $1.38 ................................ $0.89 ................................ $3.00 ................................ $0.10 $0.50 ................................ $58.50 $0.27 Traffic and geographic barriers currently present challenges to providing adequate response time in some areas. For this reason, RRFA also has turnout and response time standards for measuring performance across the entire service area and by individual station. Turnout and response time standards are documented in SOP 4101 "Response Guidelines". First, this policy addresses turnout times, or the interval that begins when audible or visual notification is received by firefighters from the 911 center and ends at the beginning point of travel time. SOP 4101 states: "Turnout time for emergent responses shall be expedient and no longer than one hundred twenty seconds." Second, this policy addresses response times, or the interval that begins with notification and ends with the time the unit arrives on scene. SOP 4101 states: "The organization aspires in a non -disaster situation, under current conditions of funding, staffing, and equipment, to respond to 90% of the emergency service calls within 7 minutes and 30 seconds from the time of dispatch." These standards are summarized in Exhibit 3-2. 5 Source: RRFA Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees, 2023 Capital Facilities Plan 16 Back to Too Exhibit 3-2. Response Time Level of Service Standards Service Standard Response Time Meet Response Time Goal Turnout time for emergency response 120 seconds 100% .................. ._................................................... .. ........._................................. First unit arrival 7 minutes and 30 seconds 90% from the time of dispatch Measuring response time helps RRFA to identify where additional capacity may be necessary. It also helps to identify where current conditions such as station design, local traffic, land use, or geographic barriers are presenting challenges to responding to incidents in a timely manner. For example, Fire Stations 13 and 16 are multi -story buildings that require response crews to travel from a second story to the main story in order to respond, thus increasing their turnout time compared to a single -story station. Similarly, the increased density of multi -family housing and commercial development outside of the Fire Station 11 response area reduces the probability of meeting the response standard and impacts response time level of service for that property type. The response time level of service standards for 2022 are displayed in Exhibit 3-3 and 3-4. Exhibit 3-3. 2022 Response Time Level of Service Standards for Fire/Other In/Out of Jurisdiction Turnout time under 120 seconds Response time under 7.5m In Jurisdiction 50.66% 81.87% Out of Jurisdiction 56.22% 32.33% Exhibit 3-4. 2022 Response Time Level of Service Standards for EMS In/Out of Jurisdiction Turnout time under 120 seconds Response time under 7.5m In Jurisdiction 74.26% 94.06% Out of Jurisdiction 72.02% 72.13% Capital Facilities Plan 17 Back to Top 3.1.3 Washington Surveying Rating Bureau Protection Class A Washington Surveying Rating Bureau (WSRB) protection class (PC) is a score from 1 to 10 that represents the community -provided fire protection capabilities available at a specific property. A PC of 1 indicates exemplary fire protection capabilities are available; a PC of 10 indicates the fire protection capabilities, if any, are not sufficient to receive credit for insurance. Each community in Washington state has a PC, which is used as a starting point to determine the PC of individual properties. In 2018, the City's PC was upgraded from a Class 3 to a Class 2.6 This put the RRFA's fire protection of the City in the top 5% in the country and top 1% in the state. In July of 2022, the City of Seattle became the first and only fire department in the state to achieve a Class 1 PC. Exhibit 3-5. City of Renton 2018 PC Rating PC Ratings Country Wide (2018) 10000 9214 8000 6991 6964 6000 1 3490 2947 4000 2000 1597 0 348 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PC Ratings State Wide (2018) 200 149 6501 150 126 106 107 100 80 1094 50 0 5 ' I ' _ 0 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 The improvements made to fire and life safety throughout Renton over the past several years have led to this outstanding upgrade in PC for the Renton community. Because a community's PC is one of the key factors in insurance premium determination, not only does this upgrade represent exceptional fire and life safety protection, but Renton property owners also have an even greater opportunity to realize insurance premium savings. KCFD25 and KCFD40 both maintain a PC of Class 3. A community's PC rating is evaluated using the following criteria: ■ Fire department (40%), including distribution of stations, staffing levels, equipment, and personnel training. ■ Water supply (35%), including water flow capacity, fire hydrant location, and maintenance. ■ Emergency communications system (9%), including dispatching system, staffing, and training. ■ Fire safety control (16%), including fire code and building code enforcement, fire investigations, and public fire education programs. 6 Source: Country Wide PC Ratings were obtained in 2019 from wwwwww.isomitigation.com/ppc/program-works/facts-and-figures-about-ppc-codes/ppc/program-works/facts-and-figures-about-ppc-codes- around-the-country/. State Wide PC Ratings were published in the WSRB Protection Class Report for Renton, dated October 5, 2018. Capital Facilities Plan 18 Back to Top Because the PC criteria that most affect the overall rating are the fire operations and deployment of resources for fire protection, the RRFA must maintain the fire protection apparatus, staffing, and deployment that supports its current PC rating as growth occurs. For example, WSRB requires a ladder to be positioned within 2.5 road miles of a given structure. The RRFA maintains a single ladder located at Fire Station 11 in downtown Renton. Exhibit 3-6 shows the 2.5 road mile radius of Fire Station 11 in comparison to the projected new development within the City. A second ladder is required to address the growth in these areas. Exhibit 3-6. Fire Station 11 Ladder with 2.5 Road Mile Radius N A �t RHFABoundary Coalreek �S F.'fIIYAl J1YP.a CornmericalJMulti-Family Parcels - nrwk•.elonrert �: nels Range ram. Cutoff C-ff Rer 0 15 d� xx'atlon I I'n: •. -ON '., �I q• t�lhn � � a 'Y �F ,lay :+f311Rv Park Also) z= � II �St�[ifln, _ A I �Communiy `� - I L 40 r ITT - Ea — :. -17 ram_ - Stx3tlUn 13 tlon 17 Pr; luvlk': 'J11 `,Puri:::nJ n� M •„MMx r F'a'r IlJriy fu `` II T ly 3 Mile s M1,131x-Ja[a'x Opa�eetM1 I I I I i —1 ii :rlili, ics. E,ri $IIJLkM' Laku V c 11, r on r IIII:�Ir, VipI.rn Capital Facilities Plan 19 Back to Too Some of the City -projected developments that will require a ladder response are shown in Exhibit 3-7 below. 7 Exhibit 3-7. Highlighted City of Renton Planned Development mac fit r. I. IM I MI R . - N+�+1�+-'+y wt Vol IS y ..ia ijc lot • - e rr - a Longacres &OG nrAw !1 111 11 Wr RA •� A w JMLe>< slit 1211im" rrL ��hTQy iMR{gy Riverside Landing X 7 Source: City of Renton: Renton Highlighted Development (arcgis.com) accessed 08/04/2023. Capital Facilities Plan 20 Back to Too Cedar River Apa,t—,ts 7f do Watershed Apartments x Keriiiydale Gateway X Capital Facilities Plan 21 Back to Top 4.0 Forecast of Future Facility Needs, 2024-2029 The following is a summary of capital facility needs for the period of 2024-2029. C§ill� WAll_1:7_,Il�I•�W_TyIIIrd01_:11:1 Over the next six years, RRFA will need to replace 17 apparatus and add 2 additional apparatus to its fleet. The inventory of apparatus in Section 2.2 provides the year of replacement for all apparatus in the current fleet. Exhibit 4-1 summarizes scheduled apparatus replacements and total costs through the year 2029. It also includes the cost of expansions to the RRFA vehicle fleet needed to serve new growth.$ Exhibit 4-1. Capital Costs for Apparatus, 2024-2029 Project Description Quantity Average Unit Cost Total Cost in Year of Replacement Percentage Related to City of Renton Growth Impact Fee Eligible Costs Apparatus Replacements Engine ......................................................................................._................................._................................................_................................................_........................................................_............................................. 3 $1,103,258 $3,826,688 0% $0 Ladder 1 $2,591,449 $2,591,449 0% $0 ......................................................................................._................................._................................................_................................................_........................................................_............................................. Aid Unit 2 $421,371 $842,741 0% $0 ......................................................................................._................................._................................................_................................................_........................................................_............................................. HazMat Vehicle 0 N/A $0 0% $0 ..............................................._............................._................._................._.............................................._.................................... Brush Truck 1 $354,413 $354,413 0% $0 ......................................................................................._................................._................................................_................................................_........................................................_............................................. Command Vehicle ......................................................................................._................................._................................................_................................................_........................................................_............................................. 4 $123,442 $493,769 0% $0 Dive Apparatus 0 N/A $0 0% $0 ......................................................................................_................................._................................................_................................................_........................................................_............................................. Service Vehicle 1 $110,086 $110,086 0% $0 ............................................................._................................._............. Staff Vehicle 2 ..........._.................................. $40,845 ...... _...................................................................................................... $81,689 0% $0 ......................................................................................._................................._..................... Utility Vehicle 0 ............... N/A _............................... ................._...................................................................................................... $0 0% $0 ......................................................................................._................................._................................................_................................................_........................................................_............................................. Sm. Utility Vehicle 0 N/A $0 0% $0 ......................................................................................._................................._................................................_................................................_........................................................_............................................. Other 3 N/A $135,332 0% $0 Apparatus/Equipment Apparatus Fleet Expansions Ladder 1 $2,591,449 $2,591,449 86% $2,222,764 ......................................................................................._................................._................................................_................................................_........................................................_............................................. Aid Unit 1 $421,371 $421,371 86% $361,422 Apparatus Total $7,622,299 $2,584,186 a See the RRFA Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees (2023) for the methodology used to determine the proportion of growth -related apparatus needs based on population. Capital Facilities Plan 22 Back to Too 4.2 STATION FACILITY NEEDS RRFA has three categories of station facility costs: debt servicing for existing stations, new station construction, and renovations to address operational needs. The costs related to these needs are summarized in Exhibit 4-2 and described in more detail below. Exhibit 4-2. Capital Facility Costs for Stations, 2024-2029 Percentage Project Description Total Cost Related to City of Impact Fee Eligible Costs Renton Growth Fire Station Debt Servicing Fire Station 16/Maintenance $15,064,544 18% $2,711,618 Fire Station Improvements for Operational Needs Fire Station 11 Facility Improvements $571,225 0% $0 ................................................................................................................................................................................................._............................................................._................................................................... Fire Station 12 Facility Improvements $883,022 0% $0 ................................................................................................................................................................................................._............................................................._................................................................... Fire Station 13 Facility Improvements $852,489 0% $0 ..................................................................................................................................................._.............................................._............................................................._................................................................... Fire Station 13 Shop Facility Improvements $0 0% $0 ..................................................................................................................................................._.............................................._............................................................._................................................................... Fire Station 14 Facility Improvements $320,319 0% $0 ..................................................................................................................................................._.............................................._............................................................._................................................................... Fire Station 14 Tower Facility Improvements $0 0% $0 ......................................................................................................................................................................................_............................................................._................................................................... Fire Station 15 Facility Improvements $0 0% $0 ..................................................................................................................................................._.............................................._............................................................._................................................................... Fire Station 16 Facility Improvements $190,542 0% $0 Fire Station 17 Facility Improvements $1,069 0% $0 Total Fire Station Costs $17,883,211 $2,711,618 4.2.1 Debt Servicing RRFA intends to relocate Fire Station 16 and build a new maintenance repair facility within the City borders to address the anticipated growth in the area. The percent attributed to City growth is 18%. Construction costs have not yet been developed; however, TCA has provided an estimate of $20M for the project. The RRFA currently has no debt but does intend to issue Limited Tax General Obligation (LTGO) bonds in late 2023 and early 2024 for the financing of the new Fire Station 16 and maintenance facility in the amount of approximately $20M. The debt service in Exhibit 4-2 represents anticipated bond payments for the years 2024-2029. See Appendix A for an estimated amortization table. Capital Facilities Plan 23 Back to Too 4.2.2 New Facility Needs RRFA has identified the need to replace Fire Station 16 in the East Plateau neighborhood on the northeast side of Renton. The existing facility was built in 1974 and is approaching 50 years old and does not accommodate the modern needs of the fire service. Building a new station will increase capacity to serve expected growth in this area of Renton for the next 50 years. In addition, the RRFA intends to build a new maintenance facility to provide the space necessary to conduct apparatus service and repair as we continue to expand our fleet. RRFA's assessment of facility needs to meet our current level of service standards has determined that 82% of this new station and maintenance facility will address existing deficiencies while 18% will expand capacity to serve future growth. Construction of the new Fire Station 16 is anticipated to begin in 2024. The total estimated cost of this station and additional apparatus repair facility, including land acquisition, is $20,000,000. Exhibit 4-3. Fire Station 16 4.2.3 Capital Projects Associated with Station Operational Needs The RRFA anticipates several improvement projects at existing fire stations necessary to address operational needs and maintain concurrency of fire services through 2029. These improvements include major repair and rehabilitation and do not including regular operations and maintenance. They are summarized in Exhibit 4-2 above and detailed in Appendix B. 4.3 PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND CAPACITIES OF EXPANDED OR NEW CAPITAL FACILITIES 4.3.1 Apparatus The RRFA has identified the need to add one aid unit and one ladder to serve the new growth within the City. Appendix C highlights the areas covered by the addition of an aid unit at Fire Station 11, much of which includes new development parcels. Appendix D highlights the areas Capital Facilities Plan 24 Back to Top covered by adding an additional ladder and locating one ladder at Fire Station 12 and one at Fire Station 13. 4.3.2 Station The new Fire Station 16 and maintenance facility will be located at 15815 SE 1281" St in Renton. The existing Fire Station 16 is 7,732 square feet (SF) and is situated on a 58,806 SF parcel of land. Due to the limited size of the current lot, the maximum building area allowed is 12,800 SF which will not accommodate a station intended to serve growth over the next 50 years, the average longevity of a fire station. In addition, the current maintenance facility located at Fire Station 13 is at maximum capacity and cannot accommodate servicing any additions to the RRFA fleet. An additional maintenance facility is needed. The new Fire Station 16 will be located on a 150,200 SF parcel of land and that will allow up to 25,100 SF of building space. A single -story station of approximately 15,150 will accommodate eight beds and three bays and a five -bay maintenance facility are planned for the new parcel. See Appendix E for a preliminary layout of the parcel. Capital Facilities Plan 25 Back to Top 5.0 Capital Facilities Revenue Analysis 5.1 OVERVIEW This CFP revenue analysis supports the financing for providing facilities and services, as required by RCW 36.70A.070(3)(d). Revenue estimates, using assumptions based on historical trends, are used to represent realistic expectations for revenue that may be available for capital funding. This revenue analysis provides an approximate, and not exact, projection of future revenue sources. The numbers projected in this analysis are for planning purposes and cannot account for sensitivities such as local, state, and federal policy, economic trends, and other factors. This analysis may not align with RRFA's annual budget because it is based on multi -year projections of revenue, while the annual budget presents precise estimates of available revenue for spending in a specific fiscal year. 5.2 FUNDING THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Estimated future revenues are projected for the years 2024-2029. The revenue analysis is categorized according to: ■ Dedicated Capital Revenues. Dedicated revenues are required to be used for certain types of capital spending, outlined by the law. The dedicated capital revenues for RRFA include fire impact fees remitted to RRFA by the City. ■ Operating Transfers. Operating transfers -in are those revenue sources that are transferred in from the operating fund. Although these are not dedicated sources to be relied on for capital funding, the RRFA endeavors to make regular operating transfers -in to its reserves on a level basis each year. These transfers are not specifically dedicated to capital spending and could be used elsewhere. ■ LTGO Bonds. Financing bonds that do not require voter approval or include the levying of an additional tax to repay them. ■ Other Funding Sources. The RRFA continuously explores external sources available to fund capital projects such as grant opportunities. 5.3 ASSUMPTIONS The RRFA revenue analysis is based on the following assumptions: ■ Analysis Boundary. The analysis includes the current RRFA boundary as shown in Exhibit 1-1. ■ Growth. Growth targets were provided by the City staff and reflect projections as of August 2023. ■ Property Tax. This analysis assumes that the property tax levy rate will reset to Capital Facilities Plan 26 Back to Top $1 per thousand in 2024 with the successful passing of Proposition 1 in August of 2023. Property tax revenues will increase at an annual rate of 1% going forward, with the assessed value and new construction growing according to the July 2023 King County Economic and Revenue Forecast — Office of Economic and Financial Analysis. ■ Fire Benefit Charge. In 2021, the voters approved a ten-year renewal of the fire benefit charge with a vote of nearly 82% in favor of the proposition. By law, the fire benefit charge may be used for up to 60% of the RRFA operating budget. In 2023, the fire benefit makes up approximately 35% of the RRFA's total budget. With the passing of Proposition 1 (see above), the RRFA intends to lower the fire benefit charge by as much as 50% and is estimating that the benefit charge will account for approximately 17% of the 2024 operating budget. ■ Fire Impact Fees. This analysis assumes the City will adopt the 2024 fire impact fees proposed by the RRFA and will remit fees collected to the RRFA as outlined in the interlocal agreement between the City and the RRFA. Projected residential and commercial impact fee revenues are based on residential and nonresidential growth projections provided by City staff. ■ Fire District 40 Service Contract. RRFA and KCFD40 entered into a twenty-year agreement in 2022 and maintains a collaborative relationship with the governance board for the district. This analysis assumes that from 2024 forward, the service contract grows annually at a rate relative to the costs of operating the RRFA. ■ EMS Levy. This analysis assumes revenues from the EMS levy continue to increase at an annual growth rate of 3%. ■ Permits and Fees. This analysis assumes revenues from miscellaneous permits and fees will remain at now current rates. ■ EMS Services. This analysis assumes revenues from EMS services will increase at a rate of 5% per year and Ground Emergency Medical Transport (GEMT) revenues will remain level. GEMT funding is at the discretion of the federal government and the program could be modified or cancelled at any time. 5.4 FIRE IMPACT FEES The City has collected fire impact fees since 2011. In 2023, the debt service on Fire Station 13 was paid in full and the City now remits fire impact fees to the RRFA on a monthly basis. Impact fees collected through 2023 will be used for capital facility needs identified in the 2017 RRFA CFP. Fees collected beginning in 2024 will be used for capital facility needs identified in this CFP. The RRFA projects fire impact fees of $5,074,209 for the years 2024 through 2029. Exhibit 5-1 compares the projected fire impact fee revenue to the projected growth -related project costs, as presented in Exhibit 4-1 and Exhibit 4-2. Capital Facilities Plan 27 Back to Top Exhibit 5-1. Projected Dedicated Capital Revenues and Costs Dedicated Revenues and Project Costs Fire Impact Fee Revenues (remitted) Planned Growth -Related Project Costs Estimated Dedicated Funding Surplus/(Deficit) 5.5 OPERATING TRANSFERS 2024-2029 Total Revenues and Costs $5,074,209 $5,295,804 ($221,594) The projected revenues available for operating transfers -in overthe planning period of 2024-2029 is $33,200,000. RRFA's funding streams for these transfers -in and for capital facilities costs include revenues from its property tax, fire benefit charge, KCFD40 service contract, EMS levy, LTGO bonds, and miscellaneous permits and fees. 5.6 SIX -YEAR COST AND REVENUE COMPARISON This six -year comparison looks at RRFA's total revenues and planned project costs for the six -year planning horizon of 2024-2029 in order to understand the difference between future dedicated capital costs and potential future revenues. Capital costs are presented as year of expenditure (YOE) and include growth -related capital facility and apparatus replacement costs. Exhibit 5-2 summarizes projected capital facilities revenues and costs.9 Exhibit 5-2. Estimated Capital Facilities Revenues and Costs, YOE Capital Facilities Revenues and Costs 2024-2029 Growth -Related Capital Costs $5,295,804 Capital Replacement and Project Costs, not Growth -Related $22,492,690 Total Costs ML $27,788,494 Impact Fee Revenue $5,074,209 Operating Transfer Potential Revenue $33,200,000 Estimated Funding Surplus/(Deficit) $10,485,716 5.7 POLICY OPTIONS AND OTHER FUNDING SOURCES One additional funding source option is: ■ Unlimited Tax General Obligation (UTGO) Bonds: Financing bonds that require voter approval and include the levying of an additional tax to repay them. 9 Source: Renton RFA, 2023. Capital Facilities Plan 28 Back to Too Appendix A: Amortization Schedule Debt Servicing Amortization Schedule Payment: Every 6 Months Term: 10 Years Amount: $20,000,000 Interest Rate: 4.50% Year Beginning Balance Interest Principal Ending Balance Payment 1. Year #1 $20,000,000.00 $454,239.90 $801,138.78 $19,198,861.22 $1,255,378.68 2024 ....................................._......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2. Year #1 $19,198,861.22 $436,044.44 $819,334.24 $18,379,526.97 _...................... $1,255,378.68 2024 ......................... ............ _ 3. Year #2 ................................................................................................ $18,379,526.97 $417,435.73 ...................................................._......................................................_............................................._...................... $837,942.96 $17,541,584.01 $1,255,378.69 2025 ....................................._ 4. Year #2 ................................................................................................ $17,541,584.01 $398,404.37 ...................................................._...................................................... $856,974.32 $16,684,609.70 _............................................. _...................... $1,255,378.69 2025 ....................................._......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5. Year #3 $16,684,609.70 $378,940.77 $876,437.91 $15,808,171.79 _...................... $1,255,378.68 2026 ....................................._......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6. Year #3 $15,808,171.79 $359,035.12 $896,343.57 $14,911,828.22 _...................... $1,255,378.69 2026 ....................................._......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7. Year #4 $14,911,828.22 $338,677.37 $916,701.32 $13,995,126.90 _...................... $1,255,378.69 2027 ....................................._............................................................................................... 8. Year #4 $13,995,126.90 _...................................................._...................................................... $317,857.25 $937,521.43 $13,057,605.47 _............................................. _ ...................... $1,255,378.68 2027 ....................................._............................................................................................... 9. Year #5 $13,057,605.47 _...................................................._...................................................... $296,564.27 $958,814.41 $12,098,791.06 _............................................. _ ...................... $1,255,378.68 2028 ....................................._............................................................................................... 10. Year #5 $12,098,791.06 _...................................................._...................................................... $274,787.68 $980,591.00 $11,118,200.05 _............................................. _ ...................... $1,255,378.68 2028 ....................................._......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11. Year #6 $11,118,200.05 $252,516.51 $1,002,862.18 $10,115,337.87 _...................... $1,255,378.69 2029 12. Year #6 $10,115,337.87 $229,739.50 $1,025,639.18 $9,089,698.69 $1,255,378.68 2029 ....................................._......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13. Year #7 $9,089,698.69 $206,445.19 $1,048,933.49 $8,040,765.20 _...................... $1,255,378.68 2030 ....................................._......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14. Year #7 $8,040,765.20 $182,621.82 $1,072,756.87 $6,968,008.33 _...................... $1,255,378.69 2030 ....................................._......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15. Year #8 $6,968,008.33 $158,257.37 $1,097,121.32 $5,870,887.01 _...................... $1,255,378.69 2031 ....................................._......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16. Year #8 $5,870,887.01 $133,339.56 $1,122,039.13 $4,748,847.88 _...................... $1,255,378.69 2031 ....................................._......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17. Year #9 $4,748,847.88 $107,855.81 $1,147,522.88 $3,601,325.01 _...................... $1,255,378.69 2032 ....................................._......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18. Year #9 $3,601,325.01 $81,793.28 $1,173,585.41 $2,427,739.60 _...................... $1,255,378.69 2032 ....................................._......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19. Year #10 $2,427,739.60 $55,138.81 $1,200,239.88 $1,227,499.72 _...................... $1,255,378.69 2033 ....................................._......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20. Year #10 $1,227,499.72 $27,878.97 $1,227,499.72 $0.00 _...................... $1,255,378.69 2033 gpOt6qyg cilities Plan 29 Appendix B: Major Repair and Rehabilitation for Stations Station/Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Fire Station #11 10000000IAC $ 255,571 $ 26,095 $ 186,491 $ 103,068 Unit $ 155,179 .......................................................................................................................................................................... Carpet/Tile/Hardwood/ Concrete _..................................... _..................................... _..................................... _...................................... $ 67,652 Finishes F .......................................................................................................................................................................... Ceiling Finishes/Drop ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ....................................... $ 12,490 Ceilings/Acoustic Tile .......................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................_....................................._....................................._...................................... Exhaust Fan .........................................................................................................................................................................._....................................._....................................._....................................._...................................... $ 47,306 Expansion Tank .......................................................................................................................................................................... _..................................... _..................................... _ ....................................._...................................... $ 1,069 Furnace .......................................................................................................................................................................... . ..................................... _..................................... $ 139,185 _ ....................................._...................................... Heat Pump .......................................................................................................................................................................... $ 95,008 . ..................................... _..................................... _..................................... _...................................... Interior Walls .......................................................................................................................................................................... . ..................................... _..................................... _..................................... _...................................... $ 21,857 Water Heater $ 5,384 $ 26,095 Fire Station #12 $ 315,770 S 111,539 $ 304,134 $ 117,146 $ 26,577 $ 7,856 Air Compressor .......................................................................................................................................................................... $ 16,468 ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ....................................... Air Handler Unit .......................................................................................................................................................................... _..................................... $ 297,923 _..................................... _..................................... _...................................... Automatic Transfer Switch .......................................................................................................................................................................... _..................................... _..................................... $ 10,079 _..................................... _...................................... Boiler $ 59,290 ..............................................................65,049..._....................................._....................................._....................................._...................................... Carpet/Tile/Hardwood/ Concrete $ Finishes Fire Alarm Systems .......................................................................................................................................................................... $ 30,022 _..................................... _..................................... _..................................... _...................................... Furniture/Millwork .......................................................................................................................................................................... _..................................... _..................................... $ 47,776 _..................................... _...................................... Lighting ....................................................................................................................................................................... $ 24,290 _..................................... _..................................... _..................................... _...................................... Pump ..................................................................................................................................................................... _..................................... $ 6,211 _..................................... _ ....................................._...................................... $ 6,787 Radiant Heater .......................................................................................................................................................................... _..................................... _..................................... _ $ 6,644 ....................................._...................................... Roofing .......................................................................................................................................................................... $ 291,480 _..................................... _..................................... _..................................... _...................................... Unit Heater $ 19,933 .......................................................................................................................................................................... Water Heater _..................................... _..................................... _..................................... _...................................... $ 1,069 Fire Station 1 $ 407,561 $ 423,400 $ 21,529 AC Unit $ 13,439 Air Compressor $ 21,529 Ceiling Finishes/Drop $ 17,507 Ceilings/Acoustic Tile Condensing Unit $ 4,750 $ 5,040 Duct Heater ......................................................................................................................................................................... $ 17,497 ......................................_....................................._....................................._...................................... gpOt6q1rg cilities Plan 30 Station/Description 2025 2026 2027 2028 Evaporative Unit $ 5,320 Exhaust Fan .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................: $ 87,660 Expansion Tank .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................: $ 950 Expansion Tank ......................................................................................................................................................................... $ 1,077 ........................................................................................................................................................: Exterior Finishes ......................................................................................................................................................................... $ 61,273 ........................................................................................................................................................: Fan Terminal Unit .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................: $ 143,596 Fire Alarm Systems .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................: $ 46,432 Furniture/Millwork $ 65,649 Heat Exchanger $ 7,601 Lighting :........................................................................................................................................................................_..................................... $ _..................................... 38,693 _....................................._...................................... Roofing $ 314,476 Fire Station #14 $ 129,419 $ 123,889 $ 67,011 Carpet/Tile/Hardwood/ Concrete $ 64,872 F Finishes ................................................................................................................................... _..................................... _..................................... _..................................... _..................................... _........ .......... Doors/Hardware .......................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... $ 38,759 ....................................... Electrical Panel .......................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................... $ ...................................... 109,664 ...................................... ....................................... Interior Walls .......................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................... $ ...................................... 19,756 ...................................... ....................................... Pump .......................................................................................................................................................................... . ........................................................................... . ..................................... ....................................... $ 2,139 Water Heater $ 85,130 Fire Station #16 $ 3,075 $ 117,176 $ 49,712 $ 6,921 $ 13,658 Automatic Transfer Switch .......................................................................................................................................................................... $ 3,075 ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ....................................... Exhaust Fan $ 42,536 gpOt6qYg cilities Plan 31 Appendix C: Fire Station 11 Drive Time (Aid Unit) f 1112 m ( N 1405 RRFA Boundary s - Coal Creek i -Pioneer Park _ - NaturahAraa Commerical/Multi-Family Parcels --- `�- New acw ste 0 ® Renton Stations 1 - � New Development Parcels Name a � RRFA 11:0-7.5 ` Wildland Park I'1 May Creep ,,Station 1 Park _ LEI Lang View n a. -_r-. Peak ay Valley Park i. t o '� WA9W t I 1 { ~ -- \ JLEast enton High: _Community ` d _ r Park i I JI Stabon 54B F 'rwo tl _B I r . i I I�IIL� = _ tlotn 13 sooscre tatfon 17 PoLravdsky _ Park F Tfa115 q fliPark i, �Fai^rvootl C . ounlain Park �� •. !. _4 fit'-1y� - e 1 �� Baulevartl n playa m Spring �r - w 5 LakelLakc: WA181 J-�'' ° Q - Desim Park .o, ❑ I�Laka I • Youngs � - Resc•:, _. —I __ ivet. F F I n : — l l Terrace � I �_ II 0 '- -� 0. I 5 3 Mllss I Map data c) OPenStr tMaP eon ' Wosoft, Facebook-Inc, �ls affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map IayePbg5 lie g# cilities Plan 32 Appendix D: Fire Station 12-13 Drive Time (Ladders) f112m N ' s r J RRFA Boundary it 0 Coal Creek '= Pioneer Park NaturaliArea Commerical/Multi-Family Parcels � 5i wcastle Renton Stations i New oevelopment Parcels \ - Name �f _RRFA 12:0-7.5 I `, _RRFA 13:0-7.5 tion 1 1\� Long View PeZl , Station 12 _n NJ t � i W � �Il�\�, =East ennon Hlg\ R y� ,jam rnunity �!r� 11114 ark till in %-- -� Tukti ilai ``- I - � Station 1Soo r. 17 Pell,, Pal segaie Trails; . � aasrr�ai - C :l Ed ourmain Park m Spring F jj�rff I Lake/Lake WA 181 Desire Park i �� , Lake Youngs Reservoir ivec.7 Fl i i- al �� c_ es r• I m ..- i- - _ Shajow Lake Map data :; Ope IStroetMap con ' Wosoft, Facebook,- Inc „I Lritt: L _ affiliates, Esri Community Maps contributors, Map Iayeabg�Iie I g# cilities Plan 33 W CA W E6 r Appendix E: Fire Station 16/Warehouse Preliminary Layout RENTON REGIONAL FIDE AUTHORITY STATION 1 T '16 SITE DIAGRAMS SE 128TH ST I 'I 'I I , Uj I ;L) W I Iw I I I - I ; I ; I .,ACE jusmw PARR EL WfQM r i I.Wjcl �k+i400c: I an,rc I ' x,c xx ; I -I w DO x c.� CL CL Q CL J Z :7 '4-4 15815 SE 128TH ST PROPERTY PURCHASE #2 vj.' A A i95 MV M18%1Cus PAMMO. Nye aF «fug K,1ff9F Or dcV6%kX 1vi6 w s% gp0t6qyg cilities Plan 34 RESOLUTION NO. 4513 EXHIBIT F memorandum regarding "Transportation Impact Fee Update — Industrial Land Uses," City of Renton dated September 23, 2022 transpogroup WHAT TRANSPORTATION CAN BE. MEMORANDUM Date: September 23, 2022 TG: 1.22123.00 To: Paul Hintz, City of Renton From: Jon Pascal, PE, Transpo Group Brent Turley, PE, Transpo Group cc: Brianne Bannwarth, PE, City of Renton Subject: Transportation Impact Fee Update - Industrial Land Uses The purpose of this memorandum is to document proposed updates to the City of Renton Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) methodology. The updates serve to assist the City in considering appropriate changes to the TIF methodology to better reflect the impacts of industrial land uses on the transportation system. The information presented will allow the City to utilize an updated TIF rate schedule based on the estimated truck activity for specific industrial land uses. Overview of the Existing TIF Methodology The methodology for the Renton TIF is documented in Council Resolution 4299 in the Rate Study for Impact Fees for Transportation (Henderson, Young, & Company, July 5, 2016). The overall methodology remains unchanged from this document except for the additional adjustments to the rate schedule for industrial land uses. As explained in the 2016 Rate Study for Impact Fees for Transportation, the transportation impact fees are calculated by the estimated number of new person trip ends that are created by the proposed land use. Person trip ends are used instead of vehicle trip ends because it better aligns with the mitigation fees that are for bicycle and pedestrian facilities that also use person trips. The number of net new total PM peak hour person trips in the City divided by the total TIF eligible projects costs were used to calculate a $7,145.85 PM peak hour base fee. The cost per PM peak hour trip fee is utilized to calculate a fee rate for each category of land use. The existing rate schedule was developed for commonly used land use categories to assist the City in the development review process and determination of the resulting impact fee. The process to develop impact fees by land use required converting vehicle trip generation rates from national sources into person trip rates to align with the multimodal goals of the City. The conversion process from vehicle trips to person trips utilized the following steps (see Appendix A in 2016 Rate Study for Impact Fees for Transportation): 1. Original vehicle trip rates were assembled from national source (latest ITE Trip Generation manual). 2. This "vehicle trip rate" is multiplied by 1.353 average vehicle occupancy and divided by vehicle model share of 74.2% to create a "person trip rate." This person trip reflects all modes of travel. 3. A pass -by reduction factor is then applied depending on the land use. A "pass -by" trip reflects that certain land uses do not create new overall trips, but divert an existing trip already on the network (e.g. getting coffee on the way to work at a new coffee shop). 4. A final conversion factor is applied (83.3%) to reduce the trip rate to reflect only person trips using vehicles. 12131 113th Avenue NE, Suite 203, Kirkland, WA 98034 1 425.821.3665 1 transpo. Com Updated TIF Methodology for Industrial Land Uses The following sections summarize the proposed updates to the TIF methodology to better account for the proportionate impacts of industrial land uses related to increased truck activity. Additional Industrial Land Uses The list of land uses and trip generation rates in the 2016 Rate Study for Impact Fees for Transportation (Table 9) included only three industrial land uses; General Light Industrial, Manufacturing, and Mini -Warehouse (Self -Storage). It is proposed that the list of land uses and trip generation rates be expanded to include additional industrial land use types. The expanded list of land use categories is based upon the land use definitions and rates identified in the ITE Trip Generation manual (11th Edition, 2021). The following new land uses are proposed to be added to the City's rate schedule: • #130 Industrial Park • #150 Warehousing • #154 High -Cube Warehouse: Transload/Short-Term • #155 High -Cube Warehouse: Fulfillment Center (NS) • #156 High -Cube Warehouse: Parcel Hub • #157 High -Cube Warehouse: Cold Storage The High -Cube Warehouse land use is relatively new and reflects the change in local and regional freight distribution and delivery services due to the rapid, recent growth in e-commerce over the last few years. The High -Cube Warehouse land use is broken into four categories to represent different facilities at different stages of the product delivery process. Updated Vehicle Trips Rates As part of the update process, the trip rate for Manufacturing was updated to reflect the ITE Trip Generation 11th Edition. This was a slight increase from 0.73 to 0.74 trips per 1,000 square feet of building space. The added land uses mentioned above also have trip rates that reflect the ITE Trip Generation 11th Edition. Quantifying Truck Impacts on the Transportation Network In urban settings such as the City of Renton, industrial land uses typically comprise a portion of the available commercially zoned land. Due to the nature of the businesses, the industrial land uses can generate a large number of daily truck trips. Analysis has shown that large trucks have higher equivalent axle load impact on arterials than cars (up to 100-car equivalents). The higher amount of truck trips in industrially zoned areas can have a significant impact on overall traffic operations and the necessary pavement and base material depth of arterials, resulting in increased capital costs. Large tractor trailer trucks take the same physical space as up to four normal passenger cars in a traffic queue. In addition, the slower acceleration and deceleration that is typical of large trucks can adversely impact normal traffic operations. For example, a truck stopped at a traffic signal is slow to accelerate and may take the same time to traverse a major intersection on a green light as the time that 3 to 5 passenger cars would take for the same traffic movement. The term "Passenger -Car Equivalents" (PCE) is used in traffic engineering to better reflect traffic operations with trucks present. For larger tractor trailer trucks, a PCE of 4 is typically used. For example, if 10 trucks per hour are making a left -turn at an intersection, then a PCE volume would be 40 vehicles per hour. For purposes of the TIF methodology, each truck is considered as a four - passenger -car equivalent. Tr Truck Adiustment Factor The PCE ratios were used to update the Impact Fee Rate Schedule to better reflect truck activity for each industrial land use. No truck factors were applied to other land uses. The ITE Trip Generation 11th Edition now includes trip generation rates for trucks for certain land uses, including industrial land uses. By comparing truck trip generation rates and total vehicle trip generation rates, a typical truck percentage was determined by land use. As shown in Table 1, the truck percentages ranged from 5 to 25 percent per land use category. Using the identified truck percentages, and a PCE factor of 4, a Truck Percent Factor was calculated to increase trip rates to reflect PCE vehicle trip ends by each industrial land use category. Table 1 summarizes the Truck Percent Factors and the resulting PCE Vehicle Trip Ends. Table 1. Passenger Car Equivalent Trip Ends per Industrial Land Use Category Vehicle Trip Percent Truck Percent PCE Vehicle ITE # Industrial Land Use Category Ends' TruckS2 Factor' Trip Ends° 130 Industrial Park 0.34 12% 1.36 0.46 140 Manufacturing 0.74 5% 1.15 0.85 150 Warehousing 0.18 17% 1.51 0.27 154 High -Cube Warehouse: Transload/ Short -Term 0.10 10% 1.30 0.13 155 High -Cube Warehouse: Fulfillment Center (NS) 0.16 7% 1.21 0.19 156 High -Cube Warehouse: Parcel Hub 0.64 10% 1.30 0.83 157 High -Cube Warehouse: Cold Storage 0.12 25% 1.75 0.21 Source: Transpo Group, 2022 1. Vehicle trip ends updated to reflect latest editions of the ITE Trip Generation manual (11th Edition, 2021). This is the number of vehicle trips generated during the PM peak hour per 1,000 square feet of building area. 2. Percent trucks reflects the how many trucks are anticipated within the total trips generated by the land use. Values shown are based on the truck trip generation factors provided in ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition, 2021) 3. Truck Percent Factor is a factor that is used to convert vehicle trip ends to passenger -car equivalent trip ends. This factor incorporates both the percent trucks information and a 4:1 passenger -car to truck ratio. 4. PCE Vehicle Trip Ends reflects the passenger -car equivalent trip ends. This is calculated by multiplying the truck percent factor by the vehicle trip ends rate. While some land uses such as Warehousing had a higher truck percentage at 17 percent, the actual PCE vehicle trip ends are lower than uses such as Manufacturing or High -Cube Warehouse: Parcel Hub which generate a higher rate of vehicles per 1,000 square feet of building area. The updates to focus on in Table 1 are the updated PCE vehicle trip ends compared to existing vehicle trips ends. Updated Impact Fee Rate Schedule The following summarizes how the PCE vehicle trip ends are utilized in updating the impact fee rate schedule for each of the industrial land uses. The rate schedule that includes the PCE factor is also compared to a rate schedule without the factor to understand how the updated methodology captures more of the infrastructure costs to serve land uses that have a higher amount of truck trips. New Vehicle Impact Fee Rates Table 2 summarizes the new Vehicle Impact Fee Rates based on incorporating the PCE Vehicle Trip Ends from Table 1 (both new ITE rates and truck adjustment factors). The conversion of vehicle trip ends, to person trip ends, to vehicle new person trip ends, to vehicle impact fee rates is consistent with the methodology documented in the 2016 Rate Study for Impact Fees for Transportation. Awr Table 2. Updated Transportation Impact Fee Rates Per Unit of Development Vehicle Impact Fee Vehicle New Rate PCE Vehicle Person Trip Person Trip (cost per ITE # Land Use Trip Ends' Ends2 Ends' sq ft)° 130 Industrial Park 0.46 0.84 0.70 $5.00 140 Manufacturing 0.85 1.55 1.29 $9.22 150 Warehousing 0.27 0.50 0.41 $2.93 154 High -Cube Warehouse: Transload/ Short -Term 0.13 0.24 0.20 $1.43 155 High -Cube Warehouse: Fulfillment Center (NS) 0.19 0.35 0.29 $2.07 156 High -Cube Warehouse: Parcel Hub 0.83 1.52 1.26 $9.00 157 High -Cube Warehouse: Cold Storage 0.21 0.38 0.32 $2.29 Source: Transpo Group, 2022 1. See Table 1 for passenger -car equivalent trip end calculations 2. Person trip ends reflects a conversion of vehicle trips to person trips using AVO of 1.353 and 74.2% mode share. 3. Vehicle New Person Trip Ends applies a 83.3% factor to convert total person trips into person trips using vehicles. 4. Vehicle impact fee rates reflect the cost per square feet by using the $7145.85 per trip fee. Applicants for building permits who propose development in any of the industrial land use categories in Table 2 can calculate the total transportation impact fee as follows: 1. Select the appropriate land use category from Table 2, and find the impact fee rate per unit in the far right column. 2. Determine the amount of square feet of development the applicant proposes to build. 3. Multiply the impact free rate by the square footage amount to be built. The result is the total impact fee to be paid to the City. ComDarison of Vehicle Imaact Fees With and Without Truck Adiustment Factor To understand how the updated rate schedule for industrial land uses would compare to a rate schedule without the truck adjustment factor, a comparison table has been prepared. Table 3 compares the updated Vehicle Impact Fee Rate with and without the Truck Adjustment Factor methodology. The "without condition" still uses the updated ITE Trip Generation rates from the 11th Edition for a better comparison. As shown in Table 3, the Truck Adjustment Factor increased the Vehicle Impact Fee Rate about 15 to 78 percent than the default trip generation rate and fee. Table 3. Comparison of Vehicle Impact Fee Rate With and Without Truck Adjustment Factor WITHOUT PCE WITH PCE Vehicle Impact Vehicle Impact Fee Rate Fee Rate Percent ITE # Land Use (cost per sq ft)' (cost per sq ft)2 Difference 130 Industrial Park $3.72 $5.00 +35% 140 Manufacturing $8.00 $9.22 +15% 150 Warehousing $1.93 $2.93 +52% 154 High -Cube Warehouse: Transload/ Short -Term $1.07 $1.43 +33% 155 High -Cube Warehouse: Fulfillment Center (NS) $1.72 $2.07 +21 % 156 High -Cube Warehouse: Parcel Hub $6.93 $9.00 +30% 157 High -Cube Warehouse: Cold Storage $1.29 $2.29 +78% Source: Transpo Group, 2022 1. Reflects the vehicle impact fee with the new ITE Trip Generation 11th Editions rates but without any truck adjustment factors (passenger -car equivalents). 2. Reflects the vehicle impact fee with the new ITE Trip Generation 11th Editions rates and includes truck adjustment factors (passenger - car equivalents). Aw/ 4 Next Steps It is assumed the updated vehicle impact fee rate schedule for industrial land uses would be incorporated into the overall 2021-2022 fee schedule available on the City's web site. Awr