Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA97-123 ' TRANSPORTATION 1. A traffic study prepared by David Hamlen and Associates (August 5, 1997) shows no net increase in average daily trips for this proposal. Current use as a trucking facility . generates the same or more daily trips than the proposed use. Therefore, no traffic mitigation fee is warranted. PLAN REVIEW-GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control, most particularly mud and dust control, shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. 4. An eight foot (8') wide utility easement along the eastern property line is required prior to any permit being issued for maintenance of the existing sewer line. CC: Neil Watts COILGF.DOC PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF .,TTrP,a.TAIE NY - SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. CITY OF REN TON, STATE OF WASHINGTON I I" I I To FIRE HYDRANT I "FOUND taut LION w/ EX LB \ Q I NEW WATER I Q I LEAD s TACK IN CASE 'I' `� RN EL=2760' NEW WATER ONNECRON A H JO' JO' 005'SOUTH OU UNE O Twv a=2]10'-14'COP WOWSTORM Ir1 -MAIN CONNECPON • - +W CONNECT AND EXTEND STORM \ X cB CC (l/9JJ9°" � RN a=..14 W GRAPHIC SCALE g HN VO AVE S&S lM Sr GRAIN TO PROPOSED SITE. I WV£L=21J4'6"E �I NE LOR SEC 19-2J-5 } /I COR 19-23-5 I O X CR e ti FOUND CONC NON. FOUND 1/8 PIN IN CONC J0" JO' RIM EL=2151 649 61' PER D££D " BIRA55=i IN LEAD $4� IN CASE(J/9) 101J2J'W OF NE /� INV EL=2666'-6"W 64967.0 J0PER I %CASE(2/9lJ SQ @'. qWP COR 19-23-5 y v ® U� 1 uL.P.' J L _ 4`� Pc I mM"'3 _ v Inch�11t Am® nWAv .2 __ 'P I SOUTH 7th STREET ,fir «' q LIMO McSENERLINE ., 'h '''' �dc 16, $ uEmOrO$ Rt SURVEY NOTE: DE, c _ _ \ N 9'41'J W 1 4(BASI BEARINCL �� 2661_BB'(FLEAS) _ _ ^ __ 1 _ 1 _Il_ INSTRUMENT:NIKON TOTAL STAPON OTM-AIOLG (n a g T 4292 f 6 =,,m« �' 4+ (5 SECOND INSTRUMENT). vr�•w r ¢� SlO Jr' METHOD USED:FIELD TRAVERSE WITH ACTUAL CC 1.4 C G—y—G . Gy —B C C G C `O` G G 14•W Fl£LD MEASUREMENTS AND ANGLES LlJ x Z nCTB`��]�YZ",C_F }ff\�_-®f-d'�slt' 6t J .a QT¢m--e. _ MV� v�4'°° 3 I DALE OF SURVEY.CJULY 199]OJO Z Y wtxu— i1A,,6 tt+Ait 6,tf�k� z�vv \ J BASS OF BEARING:NOR1H LINE OF THE NE 1/4 • •.^ �,ti �� .. II 0 v' SEC 19-2]5(I�89'OI"J6•) N EX CB •A �N\ 11111111\ \ ~ BENCHMARKCITYO R£NTON MON MI92O:]"BRASS DISK 2�'RM a=2796' 1ii \�i'f^ in q W NEL=25 61' 6"WZry STAMPEDKINGCOUNTYSURVEYMONUMNETN 61 DISK kOLL/WATERW. p I BUILD .1117 \ ylE A = 9i=WO. I; SIDEWALK ON EEAST SIDE OF RAINIERAVES LOCATED NfX CBRILI EL 1825 .+,' NLOE APOINE OF SBJ'BE99M)RwY AT 604 RAINER AVE S, QW,EX CB J 'I NEW CB— — � I vss 3 .63 `r . NVa=2925 6'NE&SW a, MRIM EL=2JJJ' _ I WAIL WATER csJ i.— _ .. 5�.;X m ,,\INV EL=161J'-5$ �"�44" SEPARATOR -- _ NEW CB e o°W NOTE O 7 S o I I r' .` Wn u •• GS 1117 EX SS MN ANYNDERG9WND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED SOLELY 1� {{`w"'�__lt'■^ RIM a=21 J• Iwi UPON INFORMARON PROMO BY OTHERES TOLIMA ENGINEERS b°`'�• E w m / NI A=OEM „E �I ',I,, '4Y INv EL=2r JJ'-a"NJ, DOES NOT ACCEPT aEsnaxslRurr OR ASWM£LIABILITY FaR n11nn11 lea rI 7' :. in III 1 i" J in THEIR ACCURACY OF CONPLERNESS Y 0 RIM CB llfl� yyl' -I V_.!' op R9,14 1 W 1 A-100003J ^+6 M C.Yl H1 R'' ev 1G 11 i 119.06' u INv a=2.61'-6"E �_ I_ IY' A= 18'55'29" Ilan:1 \ Li ■� zso..� ;( ravo, \�R= LEGEND (EXIST,) ///=I I 82.5 6 EX SSMH c+ DECIDIOUS TREE O1 <n Irk I � 6 NEW FH i g„1 `a1� A ' ❑ Ex CATCH BaSN rmE I C 11 2 4 C CATCHBASH T PE 2 ONI ER TREE lv J V G O 'AWICW 00 a £ ee ', • $ wa TER £HYDaLK /�� H£f-0E I E+0` NE • _ / I NEW CBY°� ������� � 11 `Nw , W �t.341" 4;+\ Tv \ ,� WF RANI p UrIYIPOLPOLE / ,.,.—Nary ,,�� ��L ' V \\'' AIFHR B[�R map E / 1�1 .I I PI.D P �4� �Js.. semi 4 W Ow OFF Guy Box "IrilLLJ ,t \ N m TECEPHOwE CABNAIE UT_a BCKERY I� I - X 1 W✓ ee 0'1 ® CABLE TV CABNAI£ O NON IN CASE +rp R' AE �,c R ,'$1j'c'I 0 GAS VALVE 6, SURFACE BRASS MONUMENT J is W -� /yr ` E `b OO TREVHL vE MnuHIXE H PK NAIL FOUND RCBAa W CAP ~ o I i :.■ z I 'PN 'zi¢^I BUILDING N I B>. © POWER vauLl OF IRON PIPS�-IIl 1,� / 1 0JN04;_,/�T0 O LIGHT POLE O�I t 5 nR�W II F , MRL R.?''' RAIN M1P,/ 6 T a'ib am ss MD w a ® ONIIORINC x£LL ( V b °s I / TADS,1 NEL6o5 AND I - JF EX SS MH \,,`.p' \\^ PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTILN POLE b 2D ffiADS 1O NEIM, Aar n AJiw.' rn CmiW O YL(OM1 ITY .. Ii Y.vvt•IG &2 Mp I 5r O. ." RIMEC=!r BB \c'-.c.. m SIGN r� rtl SYSTEM V % �6OnYdaLCo]Qrt a0 TWO POST SIGN L�._.—. //,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,. ,N I e�e e\ .B / RAFNc u0cnoN Box �3+ _ Ef r 1 B. ,'EXISRNL ECOLOGY \ z U ,eI BLOCK WALL N Nk\\‘'‘, v /'-, / / a LEGEND (NEW UTILITIES) a_NEW STORM DRAIN QO NEWPROPOSE CC BUILDING N-4 / / °y W FH ■ NEW CATCH BASIN U, EEyypp NEW WATER MAIN II N£w SDEWALK NEW FH ' \ 2,, R = 138242( 2,4 LEGAL DESCRIPTIONLU Z) 2:'B THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST OF THE NORTHEAST WARTER OF SECTION 19,TODDSIIP 23 NORTH, • w tI� RANGE 5 EAST,ALUM/Era'MERIDIAN.IN KING COUNTY.WASIINGTON.DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS i'�t E GE BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUM:6157ON AND RUNNING THENCE REST ALONG THE g / 0 E f NORTH LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 11513 FEET; Dr+ ON THENCE SOUTH JO FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED, W �90 �EOaG THENCE WEST ALONG A LINE JO FEET SOUTH W AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIWSIW A j'1 Al DISTANCE L6-235 FEET TO THE NEST LINE OF THE EAST 1013 23 FEET OF SAID SUBDIWSON, x -ow-TTr 2 91v /..- THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID NEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 43565 FEET,MLWE OR LESS,TO E roewo =-,- =.. 4, NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY; \jam '6'-'�• .THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY BARON TO THE W r£RSECIION OF SAID LINE WITH A °CO, 1 R, LINE ma,IS JO FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBOINSON. THENCE NEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL UNE A DISTANCE OF 275 4 FEET,MORE OR LESS TO E TRUE POINT ..ue T.wrt Of BEGINNING: 0,10,0 Ain, EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT Tort Aar aTT / CONVEYED ID ME dry OF RENTON UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7604300800 Tec x0 12W/NToxc C11,- boars 60' <EXIT EXISTING BUILDING_#3 g /EXIT. (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) 6,194 s.f. ' / /` // EXIT MAIN < Ica . ENTRY us' D. }FIRST FLOOR PLAN / .- O.\ • IT p' `NEW•PROPOSED BUILDING #4 EXIT (LIGHT SPRING COILING&I FNISHING)AUTOMATIC V. 16,500 s.f. n RATED WALLS • PER CODE 77' ' ' EXIT -■ . < EXIT Ili \ // EXIT III THESE°OCRS WILL BE REPLCED ■ EXISTING :UILDING \I\ / I Aw s MO wx0oWslam. (EXISTIN OFFICES) EXISTING BUILDING R1 EXISTI',°I 8 4,600 s.f. trio 1 (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) I \I \ // (EXISTING LOADING] BAYS) 10,933 s.f. g Air. /I/ \\ oO0t Lo1FDcAnacx-E me 'g / IIII \ J L < wR1r PIFws1Rc BE RF➢1KE0 ill _.1f I 1u0°s0 "smcncvt NEW WILL WALLS AND W'moWS.m. IENTRY SECOND FL OOR ACE _ SECOND FLOOR PLAN __ - _ 1 # FIRST FLOOR PLAN 100. 149' D9 f RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY RA 9]-CE - GENERALIZED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS RICHERT & ASSOCIATES DACE LC R e-t- 97 434 S.W.7TH ST.RENTON,WA.98057 SHEET ISSUE FOR ARCHITECTS PLANNERS RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY Al . 325 BURNETT AVE.N.,RENIGN,WA.98057 9311 Southeast 36th ST. #110 phone (206) 232-1700 FLOOR PLANS Mercer Island, Wa. 98040-3799 fox:(206) 232-1706 _ 1 1 /—caiCRsR ruin N N ' I \--ACCENr PAWED BARD { SOUTH ELEVATION �r SASE OF BOWING /—°�aE ruLL N \—ACCENT WEST ELEVATION PToEBN�Nc BUILDING #4 EXTEMOIR ELEVATIONS VATIONS SCALE: ,/B-e,•-EE ER=TIND NRmDeS IPEDEDSEEDED AwNwo J 1 1 1 _ I I 1 I _ 1 1 1 I OH.POOR EAST ELEVATION ; ;,�,�PN Ev ,,, MG SOUTH ELEVATION C I I I I ICI 1 II I I I �� PEE w LL� IXKTND f—PAINT COSING 1 � WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING #3 ENTERHOR ELEVATIONS V\TIONS SCALE: ,/�_,•-� AB/I RA 97-9039 RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY RICHERT & ASSOCIATES RN DATE GENERALIZED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS B ECR 8-,-97 NOTE PENSE/RECYCLING AREAS AND ROOFTOP EOUiPYFM TO BE SCREENED 434 S.W.7TH ST.FOR ARC WA.98057 SHEET ISSUE ARCHITECTS PLANNERS RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY ///��� 325 BURNETT AVE.N.,RENTON,WA.98057 - -- 9311 Southeast 36th ST. #110 phone: (206) 232-1700 A EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS _ Mercer-Island,-Wa-98040-3799 tan: (206)232-1706 • STONY BEYOND---R.—A. �P"NT COSSING EIE WAU. / /—LOR E WALL—' -- \ WOOED CANOPIEB N BE RExWATEO \ / ro EAST ELEVATION \-.`° F ar2 TO BE REFIXED WINO. W. w wing SYSTEM I� I/ PAINT RE � � 1. �iAM MO. wcaETE wAu CV A• d WEST ELEVATION AT 'F. Comm DOOR To BE RE.PLACED W.AIM DESIGN INTENT- NFW ENTRY RETOOL A SIGNATURE STRUCTURE THAT WILL CELEBRATE THE RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY AND SIGNAL E BUILDINGS MAN ENTRY.THE STRUCTURECOMM WINDOM WILL BE INTEGRATED WITH THE NEW ENTRY STEPS PROPOSED NOV AWNINGS OVER.10.5 AND A.D.A.ACCESS RAMP.R WILL BE A MAN FEATUREWITHIN E NEW E COURT. THEESTRUCTURE WILL I I I I I I I I I I I I I I- IHHhIH hl I! I I I I I III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I __W W.i I,� 'I I I IIIIIIIIIIIIII I I I I I I I! I 1 I f Sni M PEDESONSTRUCTED FROM E[POSED TUBULAR STEEL W.DST,ROOFING. — ^\ GNDP \ L r1 ro - I --.—µo DI 000Dw_LA LOAD COED i0 REuax,2 BAYS ro ICM COCAS N s. i I E �EABRxD �AT Pu D M INIpOw E REPLACED NORTHELEVATION M.7.�WALLSDWIS E„,UCED MESE DOORS YnLL BE RE9A[ED INFILL MIS,DD/Dw MIXDOWS COST.WINDOM £I I I II II I I I 1 W IIIIIIIIIIIIIII ,'I I I I7 'I I I IS�1111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIII J I I I I I I I I I III I IIIIIIIIIIIIII' ijyIIUIIIll11(. _ —� H% %I-- H% % MT % U NM —__I %I_— ,--I% % % %= = _ fi o�� i \ I _ - BUILDING #1 & 2 w ACOI WEAL WALLS DAEGNE WINDO/ORSY PLFA4NG SOUTH ELEVATION —If:ATE DPC EN TERIOR ELEVATIONS VASTIOO NS SCALE: IX-I.-0' , DOSS o ID S w RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANYDB A RA 9)DATE GENERALIZED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS LCR RICHERT & ASSOCIATES DATE NOTE 434 S.W.7TH ST.RENTON,WA.98057 DRAW BY B-I-B) SHEET ISSUE REFUSE/RECYCLING AREAS AND ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT TD BE SCREENED FOR ARCHITECTS PLANNERS RENTONUR COILE SPRING COMPANY ^ 325 NETT AVE RENTON,WA.98057 LJ 9311 Southeast 36th ST. #110 phone: (206) 232-1700 . EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Mercer Island, Wa. 98040-3799---- lax: (206) 232-1706 • • • I I cc tr) SITE AREA DESCRIPTIONS `j W .m.. Am.,mM �: Z ri FIRE HYDRANT cc I I H uj I s ��. � I � ` I row \- 0 L. .�� SOUTH 7TH STREET jI II ,� "�.,r..� oz ,�.:.,®,. s� f - ` j I WILDING N r I - ,m..�a,,.,.m.a,....,C�,�; gW _ 4 W 5_R 1— nI Ia� C •D�_ ( ) 1 C �- ) z AI ccccc - [!1 /41—FT—Irgine% e AUTOMOTIVE — —�(,, / ..M,NPm .� - eunrK Ili .. / \ I 1 K )prr '1 '' ....'`. II KEN.rwt ‘— 1ir " � '� .,..,.. , . •„:„ .. ...,_ ,��,� I _ 1B DGN2 I I AND FL��R � I BUILDING N.I ® �,•�•w. nFi�.ii9mm Id"�"°° Ir wco wR ®�1r \ —m G.m L ;xi. mo' 00/ mue pu r PROPOSED% • om Z BUILDING N.4w O • �—\8 �'aril T 00' z . .. =�zaz O v • In Z OG \_ • f1 III�IIIIIIII, ��um ®� O SCALE ".30' 0 zo, W / 21 AUGUST 1997 d p N Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 20010124001330 CITY OF RENTON EAS 11.00 PAGE 001 OF 004 01/24/2001 14:13 KING COUNTY, WA Title: UTILITIES.EASEMENT—W Property Tax Parcel Number: 192305-9025 Project File#: LUA-97-123 Street Intersection or Project Name:SOUTH 7TH STREET AND SM1THERS AVENUE SOUTH Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): • 1. RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation 2. • c*� The Grantor,as named above,for or and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to "'). the above named Grantee,the following described property LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Additional legal is on page 3) 0 For the purpose of constructing,reconstructing,installing,repairing,replacing,enlarging,operating and maintaining a cv utilities and utility pipelines,including,but not limited to,water,sewer and storm drainage lines,together with the right of •— ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal o ; obligation or liability therefor. Following the initial construction of its facilities,Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: a , 1. The Grantee shall,upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement,restore the surface of cv the easement,and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work,as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. 1 2. Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement as long as such use does not interfere with the easement rights granted to the Grantee. 3. Grantor shall not,however,have the right to: • a. Erect or maintain any buildings or structures within the easement;or b. Plant trees,shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage to or interfere with the utilities to be placed within the easement by the Grantee;or c. Develop,landscape,or beautify the easement area in any way which would unreasonably increase the costs to the Grantee of restoring the easement area and any private improvements therein. d. Dig,tunnel or perform other forms of construction activities on the property which would disturb the compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the right-of-way,or endanger the lateral support facilities. 1 e. Blast within fifteen(15)feet of the right-of-way. This easement shall run with the land described herein,and shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this If day of CZL,c' 19 9. coo -r7oi4T. EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED King Records Division BY; Deputy INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) My appointment expires: Dated: REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF V/ASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument,on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and mof to be the free and voluntary act of such cti, party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 0 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Cam+ Notary (Print) My appointment expires: • Dated: 0 o . Csa CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) On this \\ 1 _day of \09 c g4. , 19 1 Oj ,before me personally appeared C .1 V. V-tpk.5 to me known to be - S i&t.rS\ of the corporation that executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal•affixed i e corporate seal of said corporation. ary Pub lc and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) \C0...M`` R. 4,.\\`ava My appointment expires: L -22.-2.00 I Dated: 8 - ►\-9° C:\Niiy Documents\EASEMENT.DOC\ Page 2 FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 t, EXHIBIT"A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Must be stamped by a P.E. or L.S.) THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL"A"A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET IN WIDTH WHICH IS 5 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL"A"; THENCE SOUTH 89°42'36"EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL"A"A DISTANCE OF 363.80 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH AN ARC LENGTH OF 33.69 FEET, A RADIUS OF 30.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 64°20'32"TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE SOUTH 56°37'18"WEST A DISTANCE OF 233.66 FEET; • THENCE SOUTH 00°06'21"EAST A DISTANCE OF 3.71 FEET AND TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE. PARCEL"A" THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF 0-7 SECTON 19,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST,W.M., IN KING COUNTY, c:' WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 0 v i BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND RUNNING THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 775.23 FEET; G' THENCE SOUTH 30 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; c" THENCE WEST ALONG A LINE 30 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION A DISTANCE OF 238 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1013.23 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 435.65 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWESTERLY MARIGN OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTE •I ' 'Alis INTERSECTION OF SAID LIEN WITH A LINE THAT IS 30 F:ET ' ' • `'F+ ' • 'i• LEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; 0 ��s`• .5 •• • THENCE WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTAN s ... 4'5. T, . 51 R LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; � =' '' z: EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OFV.WES LIN in'J THT CERTAIN TRACT CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON 17;,'1 R• G •r 41 f BER 7604300800. ss, ••?'sTcc;.• �� EXPIRES 6/24/ i thv atavt iaomuwwiv "NII C:\IMIy Documents\COIL SPRINGS EASEMENT.DOC\ Page 3 FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 Map Exhibit 1• 111 1 a• a , s.34 r SH3HJ InS _ - Bat 00 s o ° 1 to m�r : Iroa Ill ,n ° I Ai I!! 1 L_ 1 N K 13 C7 1 R 1 v tLi CV . 3 cl I 1 M C=3 S 34 V SRPub7n I C-V I I • I........_.._._ry..'uriiuostwwrAri✓yw����nar�,C011.. Q R ��K H. 7b •,,( 41.rr t M.CAIwoo t • I cp... •;w0�`tf ••. I ram`4j ., la Y / 4�c�t l'' ` • a 41 0 V •L:.....:1!-. •:...:...7 .1 . C:\My Documents\EASEMENT.DOC\ Page 4 FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 . . • C 0 py Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 20010124001331 CITY OF RENTON EAS 12.00 PAGE 001 OF 005 01/24/2001 14:13 KING COUNTY, WA Title: UTILITIES EASEMENT—Sew-0x Property Tax Parcel Number: 192305-9025 Project File#: LUA-97-123 Street Intersection or Project Name:SOUTH 7TH STREET AND SMITHERS AVENUE SOUTH Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation 2. M cri The Grantor,as named above,for or and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to the above named Grantee,the following described property LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Additional legal is on pages 3 and 4) For the purpose of constructing,reconstructing,installing,repairing,replacing,enlarging,operating and maintaining cv utilities and utility pipelines,including,but not limited to,water,sewer and storm drainage lines,together with the right of ca I ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor. Following the initial construction of its facilities,Grantee may from time to time construct 0 such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is granted subject to the follo�tiing terms and conditions: 1. The Grantee shall,upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement,restore the surface of the easement,and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work,as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. 2. Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement as long as such use does not interfere with the easement rights granted to the Grantee. 3. Grantor shall not,however,have the right to: a. Erect or maintain any buildings or structures within the easement;or b. Plant trees,shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage to or interfere with the utilities to be placed within the easement by the Grantee;or c. Develop,landscape,or beautify the easement area in any way which would unreasonably increase the costs to the Grantee of restoring the easement area and any private improvements therein. d. Dig,tunnel or perform other fonns of construction activities on the property which would disturb the compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the right-of-way,or endanger the lateral support facilities. e. Blast within fifteen(15)feet of the right-of-way. This easement shall run with the land described herein,and shall be binding upon the parties,their heirs, successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this / day of CA I 19 c/`f .7)/,‘.,/k r a00o-c,o r q b EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED King `ou Records Division BY: '. _ ,Deputy f INDIVIDUAL FORM OFACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument,on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and c--I acknowledged it as the and of to be the free and voluntary act of such I party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington c-r Notary(Print) o; My appointment expires: Dated: of cv CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT • Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) On this1 \\ day of Vet S � , 199 ,before me personally appeared C��.v\L V. �. ��� to me known to be C -O of the corporation that executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixel rs ttr ate seal of said corporation. \\d• �k NOtary Public in And for the State.o as in on Notary(Print) `•\c.\•h. \R. '\\\\vq'r� My appointment expires: 4.I Z.2 zoo 1 Dated: 8- l l-5 c ` C:\My Documents\COIL SPRINGS EASEMENT.DOC\ Page 2 FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 • EXHIBIT"A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Must be stamped by a P.E.or L.S.) • THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL"A"A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET IN WIDTH WHICH IS 5 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL"A"; THENCE SOUTH 89°42'36"EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL"A"A DISTANCE OF 76.15 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 02°25'09"WEST A DISTANCE OF 120.41 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°31'13"WEST A DISTANCE OF 67.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°17'46"WEST A.DISTANCE OF 238.28 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44°59'24"EAST A DISTANCE OF 31.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67°53'51"EAST A DISTANCE OF 36.48 FEET TO A POINT ON CURVE • WHICH BEARS SOUTH 28°55'54' EAST FROM THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH AN ARC LE NGTH OF 352.47 FEET, A RADIUS OF 1376.09 FEET AND CENTERAL ANGLE OF 14°40'32"TO POINT ON CURVE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 43°40'56"EAST FROM THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE; THENCE NORTH 00°14'45"EAST A DISTANCE OF 85.13 FEET TO A DESIGNATED POINT "A"; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00°14'45"EAST A DISTANCE OF 91.33 FEET TO A DESIGNATED POINT`B"; 0-1 THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00°14'45"EAST A DISTANCE OF 20.26 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL "A"AND TERMINUS OF SAID CENTER LINE; BEGINNING AT A DESIGNATED POINT"A"THENCE SOUTH 89°46'00"EAST A DISTANCE OF 28.29 FEET AND TERMINUS OF SAID CENTER LINE; N I CD BEGINNING AT A DEISGNATED POINT"B"THENCE NORTH 89°42'36"WEST A DISTANCE OF 91.45 FEET AND TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE. PARCEL "A" THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTON 19,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST,W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND RUNNING THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 775.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 30 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE WEST ALONG A LINE 30 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION A DISTANCE OF 238 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1013.23 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 435.65 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWESTERLY MARIGN OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY C:\My Documents\COIL SPRINGS EASEMENT.DOC\ Page 3 FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 . EXHIBIT"A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) (Must be stamped by a P.E.or L.S.) RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID LIEN WITH A LINE THAT IS 30 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 275.4 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF THT • CERTAIN TRACT CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7604300800. O CZi :r1.r • o `Jv • • czp a-- qI N ' I C:\My Documents\COIL SPRINGS EASEMENT.DOC\ Page 4 FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 - Map Exhibit 1 i y P. •.1. 81, • 11 hi I 111. I' 111 S 34V sa3H1IAS- - • -o�� ' too fro S a t I / I Wo O r..In 1I N K C -- I,O[ £C'l6 ,a-, N 3,54,4 LOON I 1 I I ( 3.OP.PL00 I'Ill? 42., 1 I H =• I:( 9P m N I N A i 1Q H •S ; 2 Z o, WI 0 .IQ YOI ca 1 CO 41 I 2 r-. I ^ p Cr 1 g y I N N n Y i L`1 I it n 0) rpt m KM II o I ti = CC II-JI-°IP oo I r-- O S31YS/NFgM • O 1 Cl 1 IYOLI I CV M,60.SLZOs I to , I . . b yA E m OI a of�. �� i 01.1 e t I _,qr M,84,LLoos °rerz t' G, . II 1 vA's; •o I ` �� .7 0• 4 I .• �,.- t',VA", ili)g ' 41 I 4. �PISTrvt•• c�• '"J . 1 •,tLi f �ViXPIRES 0i22/ fI •.... _ ,.s�. .,,•r..!►i�IY C:\My Documents\COIL SPRINGS EASEMENT.DOC\ Page 5 FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 yy •'r• • -j' ..Fv tr • rl a r a:,• tl• /• F `` }J:. ,,.t?`.. RE ,i • } r5' f g,. 7es'se Tanner Ma _ November 25,.1997 . Mr. Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Co. P.O. Box 880 .. Renton, WA 98057 • Re: RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY FILE No. LUA97-123,CU-H Dear Mr.Pepka: The Examiner's Report and Decision on the above'referenced matter,which was issued on November 10, 1997,was not appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore,this matter is considered final by this office and the,file on your application is being transmitted to the City Clerk as of this date. °: ;•., ;- Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. • Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufm . Hearing Examiner S FJK/mm cc: Jennifer Henning Sandi Seeger, Development Services 200 Mill Avenue South-Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION - Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL ENVIRONMENTAL MITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for the following a dailynewspaperpublished seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a le al project under the authority of the Renton g Municipal Code. newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months RENTON COIL SPRING CO. prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF Environmental review review to convert a continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the light manufacturing use. Location: SW State of Washington for King County. corner of South 7th St.and Smithers Ave. The 15 day comment and appeal period The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County for this project will run concurrently. The Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers comment/appeal periods for this project will duringthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice, a end at c m enPM on October 13, 1997.dto Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Renton Coil Spring Co. Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's as published on: 9/29/97 Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$56.15 Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235- Legal Number 3686 2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office,First Floor,Municipal Building. I A Public Hearing will be held by the J Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular ���� /� meeting in the Council Chambers on the i e al Clerk, uth County Journal second floor of City Hall, Renton, / Washington, on October 28, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the Conditional Use Permit. / If the Environmental Determination is Subscribed and sworn before me on this �� d y of ( ,l(S — , 197 appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are I/ invited to attend the public hearing. `\``,,,+,1f1111��'''/ C ----q— ��`�n _ ` Published in the South County Journal , M M. FF/,�i' I�) / �(j V\ C September 29, 1997.3686 `�.�`�,�. .5'sioN :p.y��%,, l NotaryPublic of the State of Washington 1 7. �9F�': residing in Renton g Q �' OIARy =Y: N King County, Washington n i i,. ,fir. ''9�e0FfWAS�;`-1'4* ttitt 0771 CITY .OF RENTON : _ : . " _ ; Hearing Examiner am , - 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,..Washington'98055 - - . " Wa 0 5 2 * . 7 ' - CASTAGNO BROTHERS' ' INTER VIVOS REVOCABLE TRUST -434 SW' 7TH STREET ' . • -:. - ." RENTON,--";WA 98057 - TO Vtl R I T.Y P. It'.I 1. e. j .co - ' ADDf3. 5=„' ,1 e:e.{,t� 4 F�l �$ A�wr i i •? ;;'i r;;,5%,i.T ' ::I j i ! yy i it i i ii !i ii v..�,. •-r; • .. y-_.. - [(. . •`'.'Sf` •I.i•,Y. p ._,�.FY.:,i::':.:1' i::::'i t i 'i•ff i S. i i f i:[ j•i i i i•i ';.•••�• �..•; .. � � .•'' J'��• ..,_• ; :. '�„«''�^'•.'':'.:�' � 1�e:i:Cti.r.i.�...•.1t..r:Ctij...,."....... I.liiii 1.i:..r.1.iii li..i3itililiii4 1. .1..iI ® This paper contains 50%recycled paper,20%post-consumer. ' •- '` e November 10, 1997 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.: LUA-97-123,CU-H LOCATION: SW Corner of S 7th Street and Smithers Ave. S SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To convert 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on October 21, 1997. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report,examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding.area;the Examiner conducted apublic.hearing.on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the October 28, 1997 hearing. The legal record is recorded on,tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,October 28, 1997,at 9:07 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity map application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site plan Exhibit No.4: Landscape plan Exhibit No.5: Building elevations Exhibit No.6: Building elevations Exhibit No. 8: Letter to Hearing Examiner dated October 28, 1997 . . The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by JENNIFER HENNING,Project Manager,' Development Services, City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,Washington 98055. The applicant is Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.: LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 2 requesting a Conditional Use Permit in order to relocate an existing light manufacturing business to the site. A " trucking business is currently operating on the site. There are existing buildings on the site which shall be called Buildings 1,2 and 3 for purposes of this proposal. Buildings 1 and 2 are generally located at the south portion of the site and have a common wall. Building 3 is smaller and is located in the northwest corner of the site closest to S 7th Street. The applicant is proposing to renovate the existing buildings and to construct an additional building,Building 4,which would be constructed in the southwest corner and would be approximately 16,500 square feet. This future building would be:one story in height and approximately 22 feet tall. Together with the existing structures of about 31,000 square feet,there would be about 47,000 square feet of development on the site. The existing structures are one and two stories in height and they range from about 22 to 30 feet. The site is located at the corner of South 7th Street where Smithers and Talbot come together. It is north of South Grady Way and north of Renton Village and is not necessarily visible from that location. The site is zoned Commercial Arterial or CA which is a zoning designation that is generally intended for retail and services that need access and/or visibility from a major arterial. The CA zone does allow light manufacturing purposes within the zoning district as long as certain criteria are met. The Zoning Administrators have determined that Renton Coil Spring Company is considered to be a light manufacturing use for the purposes of defining the use with regard to the zoning categories. The decision of the Zoning Administrators was written very narrowly for this particular use because of the type of technology employed. They use what is called a cold process,not excessive heat; no odor or noxious chemicals; generally very low production of noise; low number of trips generated--for example,they have less than 10 van trips per day delivering supplies and about 4 semi-truck trips per week. This proposal would result in a less intensive use occupying the site than currently exists there. Currently there is a trucking operation with between 150 and 180 truck trips per day and it is generally more industrial in character than the particular use proposed. Renton Coil Spring has been in Renton for 48 years. They are currently located in the North Renton neighborhood and manufacture lightweight titanium springs. These are coil springs and clasp springs that are used primarily in the aircraft industry. Renton Coil Spring is proposing this move because they are growing. They have gone from 53 employees at the time of the initial application to 62 employees now,with plans to grow to 100 employees in the next 7 to 10 years. The applicant has provided a landscape plan which would add approximately 21,000 square feet of ornamental - landscaping. There is currently none on the site which is covered,by buildings or compacted gravel surfaces, so the whole site is considered to be impervious. The area that would eventually be developed for building 4 would be planted in grass and maintained until such time as building 4 is constructed. The existing structures would be painted on the exterior and awnings added above the windows. There are currently a number of truck bays which would be converted. Two of the truck bays on building 2 would remain as dock-high doors and one would remain as a drive-up door adjacent to building 3. This proposal includes parking for 68 vehicles which would be concentrated on the north portion of the site. There would be a pedestrian access leading to the main entrance of what is known as buildings 1-2 from S 7th Street. It would be a combination of a raised walkway through landscaped planter islands in the parking lot and a striped crosswalk leading over to the main entrance of the building. Staff is recommending that the walkways proposed on the east side of the building incorporate a striped walkway or some other type of pavement change to allow pedestrians to connect over to Talbot Road South as well. There would be substantial landscaping added around the perimeter of the buildings and the site, and around the parking lot. There are proposed areas • Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.: LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 3 for employee recreation that include benches and lunch areas in the extreme.southwest corner and west portion , of the site. There is also a provision for a bicycle rack. . A fire lane is proposed that would loop around the new building and the existing buildings. It is a 20 foot wide lane,but it is necked down to about 16 feet between the property line and building 2. That is an existing situation and the Fire Department has stated that it is acceptable. The main ingress and access onto the site would be from S 7th Street. The second.point of ingress-egress would be onto Talbot Road South and is strictly secondary. The Transportation staff has recommended that it be emergency access only and it would be gated and signed appropriately. This proposal was subject to environmental review and the Environmental Review Committee(ERC) issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)on September 23, 1997. They had several mitigation measures which included installation and maintenance of temporary erosion control;payment of applicable ' fire mitigation fees; limiting construction hours; and a construction mitigation plan which limits hauling hours for project construction of 8:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. j Regarding the Comprehensive Plan(CP)policies with regard to areas designated Employment Area- Commercial,these sites are intended to provide for residential uses and generally auto-oriented commercial uses that require large amounts of land or high visibility. While this site is clearly not a commercial use or residential use, it is not located on an arterial either. Because it is functionally separated from Grady Way,the nearest arterial, it is probably inappropriate for commercial uses that require a location on a high traffic, corridor. If a commercial use were to locate on this site, staff believes there could be more intensive impacts to the residential multi-family urban properties that are located across the street. Currently this adjacent area is developed as single family homes,but higher density multi-family uses are expected in the future. While the heights are allowed to go up to 50 feet in this particular zoning designation,the applicant would go no higher than 30 feet. Also the development should be compatible with the adjacent less-intensive uses with regard to lighting, fences, landscaping and setbacks. Building 3, at the extreme northwest corner, does not meet the setback for the CA zone in terms of the frontyard setback.The zoning code requires a minimum setback of 10 feet from the front and/or street. The proposal would not change the existing building setbacks. Existing buildings 1 and 2 on the south portion of the site would meet the minimum setback requirements, and future building 4 would be set back a minimum of 25 feet from the property lines. The lot coverage is limited to 65 percent and the proposal has a maximum of 35 percent lot coverage based on full build-out of the site. In terms of parking,the applicant is providing 68 spaces, including 3 accessible parking spaces for Washington's ADA compliance. The applicant has indicated that a number of employees live within Renton. Some of them bike to work or take the bus and the Renton Park&Ride lot is within 1/4 mile of this site. The applicant provided a noise assessment which was primarily reviewed during the environmental review process. This study included an assessment of the noise conditions at the existing site of the applicant and at the subject property. The exterior noise level at the existing Renton Coil Spring site was 65 decibels,taken 10 feet from an open door when compressors were running but no metal work was being done. For the proposed site the applicant did intend to confine the manufacturing operations to the south portion of the site to'existing buildings 1 and 2. When building 3,the one closest to the residences and closest to S 7th is utilized, it'would be occupied by offices. Buildings 1 and 2 are located approximately 200 feet from the property line on S 7th. Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.: LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 4 The consultant reported that noise measurements were taken from the residential area on S 7th in July of this I` year and the average ambient noise level was 64 decibels. There were higher ambient noise levels noted and that was caused by street traffic volumes on S 7th and background noise from I-405. At the time there were also trucks operating on the subject site so that was noted. The report concluded there was little chance that the relocation of Renton Coil Spring would have an adverse acoustical impact on the residential community; in fact,there would probably be a slight decrease in the noise level and its impacts to the residents to the north as compared to the existing trucking operation. There are adequate public improvements in this area. There are localized storm water problems in the vicinity, but they would not be made worse by this proposal because there are impervious surfaces on the site already. This proposal would reduce the amount of impervious surface by the addition of the landscaping. Staff is recommending approval of Renton Coil Spring subject to several conditions. The conditions are compliance with the ERC's mitigation measures; providing a revised site plan showing the location of the refuse-recyclables area; providing pedestrian access from the main entrance across the fire lane vehicle circulation area to the raised walkway; providing additional landscaping bordering the parking aisles on S 7th Street where there are gaps; installing and maintaining a lawn for the time when the new building would lag behind the use of the other buildings; eliminating excess parking spaces if building 4 is not constructed at this time; and the applicant shall appropriately sign and gate the access to Talbot Road South such that its use is for emergency access only. David Halinen, 10500 NE 8th,#1900,Bellevue, Washington 98004,attorney for applicant, introduced Exhibit 7 regarding withdrawal of the extended permit period. Charles Pepka, P.O. Box 880,Renton, Washington 98057, applicant herein,provided samples of their product and described their qualities. He recited the company's history in Renton, starting in 1949, and their projected growth in the industry because of their titanium expertise and major growth in the market. The springs themselves are coiled and the metal is stamped at the site. He described the testing by the noise consultant. The noise study was done directly across the street in a residential community. He stated they have a very good relationship with the neighbors and have never had a noise complaint. Regarding the work shifts of the 63 people currently employed,presently 50%are on first shift, about 30% on second,and about 20%on third shift. Their goal is to move into buildings 1 and 2 and remodel as soon as possible and then go ahead with the construction of building 3. Building 4 basically would not have much impact during the construction phase on operation inside these buildings. Cooling would be provided in building 1. Building 2 would be used primarily for storage and warehousing and would probably not be cooled. Building 4 would probably be cooled also. Maintaining continuous temperature in the building is preferred for accuracy of machinery. Regarding cleanup of the existing soils on site,Mr. Pepka stated that in 1996 the previous owners removed their fuel and oil tank from the property and they are working with a company called Eco Engineers to complete the process of cleanup. Roger Richert, 9311 SE 36th,#110, Mercer Island, Washington 98040,architect for the applicant, stated that Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.: LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 5 the buildings.would first receive cleaning and then the exteriors,would be painted in light,clean-colors.;'There, would be aesthetically pleasing infill walls installed in the areas where the doors are being removed. ,Some• ;: awnings would be installed over building 2 second story windows where the office area would occur. Architectural definition would be added at the main entry which is the center of the facade of building 1 and 2 that face to the north. This would be a freestanding structure and would be a focal point to signal the main entry. Gerry Edlund, 15005 SE 171st,Renton,Washington 98058,applicant's landscape architect, described the concept for the landscape plan and its relationship to adjacent properties. By adding the requested additional sidewalk area from the main entrance towards the Burnett Avenue linear park, it will be in a sense a park-like setting and an extension of Burnett Park. The proposed plant materials will be long term good material that will be easy to maintain and have a good visual appearance. The entire planting beds would be irrigated so the maintenance would be reasonable. The area of building 4, if it is not built immediately,would be grass and maintained as such. The refuse storage area is ultimately designated to be placed inside the building; if that is not possible, it would be placed on the south corner of the site,farthest away from the residential area. Corey Thomas, Fire Prevention Bureau, City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,Washington 98055, stated that the access on the westerly portion of the site where a small section of the required fire lane goes around the building does not meet code requirements. As it is a very short section of.the roadway, it does not present a major concern to the Fire Department. Buildings 1,2 and 4 will be retrofitted with fire sprinkler . . systems to mitigate any other safety concerns. Building 3 does not require a fire sprinkler system. Neil Watts,Plan Review Supervisor,Development Services Division,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South, . Renton, Washington 98055, stated that a small portion of the site that has some isolated flooding problems can be handled by the addition of a new catch basin. This site is currently entirely impervious and no changes are expected downstream from this. With the addition of the landscaping,there will be less impervious surface. The project has no requirements in terms of detention or water quality facilities. Regarding the driveway onto Talbot,he described the concerns of the adjacent accesses and increased traffic at this location. This driveway is closer to the intersection of S 7th which creates some potential problems,and because it has access onto S 7th, staff is recommending limiting that driveway to secondary access only through a gated system. In the alternative, limiting it to exit only may be appropriate. Mr.Halinen asked on behalf of the applicant to have an exit-only driveway onto Talbot. He.also agreed to a condition that if the City determined there was a safety hazard at a later time,then the applicant would be responsible for the change. • The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak,and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:25 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS &DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.: LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 6 FINDINGS: • 1. The applicant, Charles Pepka for Renton Coil Spring Company, filed a request.for approval of a Conditional Use Permit 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. 6. The subject site is located at 437 S 7th Street. The site is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of S 7th Street and Smithers Avenue South. South of S 7th, Smithers becomes Talbot Road South. 7. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 738 enacted in March 1925. 8. The site is zoned CA (Commercial Arterial), a classification it received in June 1993 with the adoption of Ordinance 4404. 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial, employment generating uses but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 10. The parcel is an almost triangularly shaped parcel defined by the alignments of S 7th, Smithers and the Burlington Northern Railroad rights-of-way. The approximately 2.8 acre parcel has approximately 363 feet of frontage along S 7th. 11. The level parcel has been used for a trucking operation for a long time. There are three buildings on the site, including two with a common wall. The three buildings total approximately 31,000 square feet. The applicant proposes retaining these existing buildings and adding another building of approximately 16,500 square feet. The existing buildings are one and two stories tall with the tallest being approximately 30 feet tall. 12. One building, Building 3, is located in the northwest corner of the site. This building is located within the CA zone's required ten(10)foot setback. Section 4-31-10.4(D)(1)(a)permits a reduced setback "provided that blank walls are not located within the reduced setback." "Blank" is not defined. 13. The other two combined buildings are located more or less across the middle of the site in an "L" configuration. They meet the required setbacks. Building 2 is the eastern building and has a south building line that runs at a diagonal following the property line. Building 1 is the westernmost building and is rectangular in shape. 14. The new building would be tucked into the south side of the crook of the "L." The new building will be an approximately 16,500 square foot, one-story addition. The one story addition will be 22 feet tall. It Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.: LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 7 will continue the diagonal line of Building 2 but with a jog creating an offset and modulation in the. southerly facade. 15. The applicant originally proposed phasing the development of the subject site with the new addition following the conversion of the existing buildings. The applicant has altered the proposal and now will develop the new building in conjunction with the rest of the project. 16. The applicant proposes adding approximately 21,000 square feet of landscaping. Landscaping will be planted along the property lines and particularly in front(north)and to the east of Building 1. The parking area will also have landscaped islands. Integrated into these areas will be employee seating, break and eating areas. 17. There will be parking for 68 vehicles located on the site and there will be truck loading areas with access to bay doors. The mixed use nature of the use creates a parking demand of between 57 and 85 and the 67 proposed appears appropriate. (The change to the timing of the new addition changes some of the original staff analysis.) 18. Pedestrian paths will link the interior of the site with the sidewalks located along the street frontage. 19. An emergency access roadway will circle around the south and west side of the combined Buildings 1, 2 and 3. One portion of the roadway will be somewhat constricted to less than the preferred 20 feet but this is an existing condition that will be continued and the Fire Department has found this acceptable. 20. There would be one driveway along S 7th that would provide both ingress and egress. A second driveway would be located on Talbot. Staff would like this driveway to be restricted to egress only. Staff would like the ability to restrict this driveway further if conditions warrant it. 21. The subject site was used for a truck operation in the past and had on-site gasoline and oil facilities. In addition,the site is packed gravel and over the years contaminants may have reached the soils. The soils will be tested and receive appropriate treatment. 22. The CA zone permits as a hearing examiner Conditional Use: Light manufacturing, including assembly and warehousing of prefabricated parts and finished parts; also including minor finishing work as part of the assembly process. 23. The nature of the proposed use did not clearly fit within staffs definition of"light manufacturing" and therefore, an administrative determination was sought from the Zoning Administrator. It was determined that"light manufacturing" was similar to or equivalent with "light industry." 24. The applicant has been operating in North Renton for quite some time and there have been no complaints from its residential neighbors about the nature of the operation or any concerning noise that might be generated by the use. 25. The area south of 7th is generally zoned CA for a variety of commercial uses. The area north of the site is zoned for residential uses(RM-U),a multiple family designation,although it is generally developed with single family homes. 26. The applicant proposes adding some additional climate control in the new buildings and work areas which should permit the doors to be closed,thereby providing additional noise insulation for any manufacturing aspects of the proposal. i I • Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.: LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 8 CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest,will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-31-36(C)which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent.property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking, unless otherwise permitted,will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where.appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested conditional use appears justified and should be approved with the conditions enumerated below. 2. Clearly, reusing this idle site will create employment opportunities in this area. The expansion of the existing business will also add new jobs to the general employment base of the City. It will also, clearly,create avoid in its current location. The nature of the proposed site, removed from well- traveled or highly visible arterial traffic makes it less likely to be used for retail uses as envisioned by both the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code. Similarly,the nature of the use is such that visibility is less.1important than an appropriate.site with room to support the proposed use and the amenities the applicant would like to include in its overall vision. 3. In addition,the site's location directly south of residential uses could make certain intense,traffic- generating uses less desirable for this site. The more or less self-contained use with only periodic deliveries and pickups of merchandise could make the use a more appropriate neighbor. The fact that the current operation has been in a residential area without problems would appear to indicate that it will continue to be an appropriate neighbor. 4. The proposed use is not precisely found among the outright permitted uses or among those permitted by Conditional Use Permit. An administrative determination by the Zoning Administrators found the use compatible or.sufficiently similar to the light industrial uses permitted by Conditional Use Permit. 5. The relocation of the existing business to this site will not create an overconcentration of light manufacturing or industrial uses in this area. It will displace a use that has actually been intrusive. Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.: LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 9 6. It is impossible to avoid saying that almost any redevelopment of the site would be an improvement over current conditions. But,that does not detract from the fact that the setback of Building 3 does not meet the current code. This can be offset by increasing the building details of the facade of this building with architectural trim,banding or other features to soften the facade and introduce interesting elements this close to the street. The introduction of these features will assure that the non-conforming building does not leave a dull, "blank" facade along the street frontage, and thereby comply with the provisions that allow a reduced street setback. 7. Again,the fact that the applicant's current use has not generated any complaints from its current residential neighbors at its current location would appear to suggest that it will continue to be a good neighbor. It should not create any undue impacts on adjacent residential uses. 8. The landscaping will also help to soften the complex of buildings and will definitely be an enhancement to what is currently located on the subject site. 9. The parking and delivery areas appear to provide both safe and adequate maneuvering space. In general,the delivery areas will be internal to the site and should thereby minimize noise that could affect neighboring uses. The parking complement appears appropriate for the entire project which is a mix of office and manufacturing uses. 10. It appears that the internal circulation for vehicles and pedestrians is safe. Links to the surrounding sidewalks are adequate. The proposed driveway along the east frontage of the site may create maneuvering hazards and the City should retain the ability to restrict both ingress and egress at this driveway as necessary to assure the safe functioning of the public right-of-way. 11. The use should not generate inappropriate noise, light or glare. The applicant's proposal to add climate control should also allow most noises to be confined within the buildings behind closed doors. 12. As noted,the landscaping appears to be generous but should be supplemented along S 7th Street to shield car headlights from leaving the site. The residential areas deserve this additional protection. 13. The City services such as water and sewer are adequate to serve the site. The Fire Department has found the emergency access road appropriate. 14. In conclusion, with the expectation that the proposed use in the proposed location will be as neighborly as it has been at its current location and with the overall improvements shown for the rehabilitation of the buildings and the landscaped open space,the proposed use should be appropriate. DECISION: The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The City shall retain the sole discretion to restrict both ingress and egress for the eastern frontage driveway as necessary to assure the safe functioning of the public right-of-way. 2. The applicant shall introduce architectural trim,banding or other features to soften the facade and introduce interesting elements to Building 3. II Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.: LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 10 3. The applicant is required to comply with the mitigation measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee threshold determination prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing the location of the refuse/recyclable area. This area must be easily accessible,yet separated from the,less intensive residential uses to the north,and , would need to be screened from view. 5. The applicant shall revise the site plan to demonstrate an additional pedestrian access from the Talbot road S sidewalk across the fire/lane/vehicle circulation area to the raised sidewalk near the building entrance the pedestrian crossing could be indicated as a painted crosswalk or alternate paving material could be used to delineate this area. The revised site plan shall be submitted for review and must be approved by the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of any building/construction permits. 6. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to demonstrate additional ornamental plantings along the north property boundary adjacent to S 7th Street. The landscape plan shall be submitted for review and must be approved by the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of any building/construction permits. 7. The property owner shall be responsible for the installation and maintenance-- including underground irrigation-- of a lawn area on the southwest portion of the site until such time that construction/building permits are issued for future development. ORDERED THIS 10th day of November, 1997. I{ FRED J. KAU AN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of November, 1997 to the parties of record: Jennifer Henning David Halinen Charles Pepka 200 Mill Avenue S 10500 NE 8th,#1900 P.O. Box 880 Renton, WA 98055 Bellevue, WA 98004 Renton, WA 98057 Roger Richert Gerry Edlund Corey Thomas 9311 SE 36th,#110 15005 SE 171st 200 Mill Avenue S Mercer Island, WA 98040 Renton, WA 98058 Renton, WA 98055 Neil Watts Scott Swinhart Craig Koeppler 200 Mill Avenue S 621 Burnett Avenue S 800 5th Ave.,#3700 Renton,WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98104 Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.: LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 11 Ewing Stringfellow 101 West Olympic Place Seattle, WA 98119 TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of November, 1997 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,P1anBldg/PW Administrator Members, Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Art Larson, Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney Larry Meckling, Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Mayor's Executive Assistant Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Pursuant to Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,November 24, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper.. An appeal to the City Council is governed.by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's.Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication-permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. . ..- ----' ----"" • .•••. . .• . ..••". • .•" . ED .•-• do 7.7- ..1711,,'s".'?"' N.,. • i...., .:: ‘ N 'Ls" ,.. ,„,:t. 7* . •,-.:1 •;;,k 4.„.' CI ,..?„,.' ,• .••,:. .. i, - •1. ::- 0 m ; 7 !.'t ; •,••`•' :-.;'''''' s • \ r--1 ... i- ..• , ,. . ... .,1,i i ...„,... I, • .•::, .,, _. .. ss: „ N ,.i.____.._.J . \ 4 ___,..i.,!._______. ..i ,,> iN.,1, -:.,i ,,,4 A• .•• -c----...: :,i• I V i.•: :I.0„..?, ,..1-. c `-'5VS,'. t• ./.. ;,,,./ -'- - --‘,— -- -,•t• ' - i"" 1.•I . --.: .".'.‘ ::.,1• ..fq• ------- N .t ..: ':.! 19--.1 ),,,.;•:',,5, ....,, 11....... , . ic..... ..0''' \\ \ \\ \ • co -.-.0 ".'--- ..1 ''''' .2>) (0 C'',1 ;iC3 Ng . •, -•..• N • .....' - 1 ' i.ca. .--..416• . .. .-.--! ....ee,-17„in .,,,„ .., ni,.: . /. . .x ..\•\,... ..\\.., . — .:," ,.......,, . 1 :e.,_,_.,,,.- 6, - „so!, , .... ., . --- - _Ell - 1 — _...______ _ . .... • • ,i, ,.. --, -1- 1;.. • ' ,, SHATTUCK r . ...:., -3-..7..=-••---_,,,/ 4•• I ....,'1.0 a-S.'''' I rt••y••,..7../X., . ...- - lc,7.r...1 ,..,,... , I I 1 trIll SI IcITER I. la pug ... V...:-.. • ... B tic CC rt•01 D1,17.•ccu ea..,in acc•••o• i $••••.r.,,0•J•••,.v.. I ..." D,)--.7-z I IC.WV 24Lcal i I r• PON. Malta..l 1 SAM 11 FrPraalrri 1 ,'gOCriraTZ I 7-05ZIT c, 1, ocrgiani- \ ! - -..---. .7,--- -1 i . ,;.10-- we' HAMONSEURIttik I 116•• ......... . ,, , _-, \ '\...:..\ ... X. --g- ''.'E' • I ' .. ' ''''''. .411111 1 HI 1 r I , ".ri_,i_. 1 -.. ,WH/TWORT I/ , ' ' , ,, ------ ---1---,7* ""T.'"1- -<• 2 _ , •:. .... ; --, 11'.ff_71°'041castioloa01'. ' .c 0 i .-c:=4/ ..m. —J. o --- -•-• ' .J. 0 - "ric.llErs gat;1;;;I'.'il ,,.. . vsitvilNo 1 , ..,0.,0 ..% Lii,,.. • -I", - --- -l'-c-.'•. --- . 4IE3 • ° !IITRilirgi7i \ il-11 r • ii _ . 4 ! ri• -1_-:-t- ok:1- -=--,- -kL3-1-.-) '...;•••, .. • ....... \\\\ . •. • \ '!..!.. . .••••• +:,, ,..', , .,... ' .N%.. • ., ---- ---, - - . !---) -,,,,:_ to.m........,............rsau“. -1=• .iCiii• Eli §i °I -- — • ""'—lernall 1. A-/ r I .. I 1/-1_ _ 1LW sgancv IV emr- : onn.cuoinv I t I dr" 1 _ ___F —--...,_ — — ...woo ...._.1 c _.......,„—=., — r — 1111 — :--_—.i —1—C]L —__ • WARM-,....__,I- -; _ 15 ,- _ ...—. 1111.77.. . . _____ _ _7_— ,__ i t "Tr. — -1_`.__ I , • . ' I • SU/T HER S i "D Iligiliggik.. .)., (,,.. • . Q al .. ,.... \ • ------- •0 - F I ---- — II 91101N "---- .. _ -_ 2- - — —•— _ — -i ._ . r.. s ,11. t.- T'6% ..•.• - •• .....•... _1 < 1-- __— .•.:• ..__. _ _ •-..-2•44•J / {----- - . ..,-- ...._ ---.I) ...a.m.. ...0.. emu.. T ••••L... / 1 I .c.. I cm. I •,' ....,....,•'2.,..•i; . .". [1 L I, .....---,,, .I C• E 14.1•0/ .. -I _-- -BC/Li-C;14.-• E. 'J.`, .k.f.:11,-.71 .. ----,-,. BORNE: ;11 ' - 1116:?)4/„. '::-/A ,,„„.'1 '•r_-- . .., .I. al-g 1-11/. 4.14•Og I-7 ° 7"1 i•— 1 - '- i — !-Li.. ..--).i._•If..L.. • ,-,4: ._,. • S-; • - - • - / - • s -- ' • .. .1 ' , I 3 L ,, I. iv..,,, rn -23 11.1V0014-1 3kI1J —I--r— . •:. --s, Ig 0 ralil o ra 0 0161 PI a I Li, 901 I - 1 PI 5 l l'''•*\ 1 ' ./ ••': - .‘ 1 . xt.i.,‘....„..... ..,;._... nfr,L.i.r.. 0.c 0.92.• z a I ' I I I . 1 pd= ;...., sir 0)0 IP PiPP I!7 i .W .-• —G.,„ • • . . . - it,4, .' I ..: 1 ;'`. 6-‘ *.--7 ei9001" R.; . .• . '41111• • : . 1::4••••• 1.- ., .,_}. 1 .. - .,;-• •-•,,En w -`• 'Ii•irdlirE `I ..• .r., .. 3 L.thig • •.1:1••_.TI.;•eft, .-i.,.,'.. • k,...,. * t . 1• . • ."..,.'ii-5::0.•-• ,,,,,,.•rel.”-, . • . . • •• • -- --- ---- --- -- -i;- - - __---- --_ - AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King ) MARILYN MOSES ,being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 10th day of November ,1997, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /OM day of 'I2 t -4<1997. 72uLLt c� Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing atie-.6711-4. ,therein. Application, Petition, or Case No.: Renton Coil Spring Co. LUA97-123,CU-H The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. r HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT �a. November 10, 1997 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.: LUA-97-123,CU-H LOCATION: SW Corner of S 7th Street and Smithers Ave. S SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To convert 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on October 21, 1997. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the October 28,1997 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,October 28, 1997,at 9:07 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity map application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site plan Exhibit No.4: Landscape plan Exhibit No.5: Building elevations Exhibit No.6: Building elevations Exhibit No. 8: Letter to Hearing Examiner dated October 28, 1997 The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by JENNIFER HENNING,Project Manager, Development Services, City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant is Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.:LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 3 for employee recreation that include benches and lunch areas in the extreme southwest corner and west portion of the site. There is also a provision for a bicycle rack. A fire lane is proposed that would loop around the new building and the existing buildings. It is a 20 foot wide lane,but it is necked down to about 16 feet between the property line and building 2. That is an existing situation and the Fire Department has stated that it is acceptable. The main ingress and access onto the site would be from S 7th Street. The second point of ingress-egress would be onto Talbot Road South and is strictly secondary. The Transportation staff has recommended that it be emergency access only and it would be gated and signed appropriately. This proposal was subject to environmental review and the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)on September 23, 1997. They had several mitigation measures which included installation and maintenance of temporary erosion control;payment of applicable fire mitigation fees; limiting construction hours; and a construction mitigation plan which limits hauling hours for project construction of 8:30 p.m.to 3:30 p.m. Regarding the Comprehensive Plan(CP)policies with regard to areas designated Employment Area- Commercial,these sites are intended to provide for residential uses and generally auto-oriented commercial uses that require large amounts of land or high visibility. While this site is clearly not a commercial use or residential use, it is not located on an arterial either. Because it is functionally separated from Grady Way,the nearest arterial, it is probably inappropriate for commercial uses that require a location on a high traffic corridor. If a commercial use were to locate on this site, staff believes there could be more intensive impacts to the residential multi-family urban properties that are located across the street. Currently this adjacent area is developed as single family homes,but higher density multi-family uses are expected in the future. While the heights are allowed to go up to 50 feet in this particular zoning designation,the applicant would go no higher than 30 feet. Also the development should be compatible with the adjacent less-intensive uses with regard to lighting, fences, landscaping and setbacks. Building 3,at the extreme northwest corner,does not meet the setback for the CA zone in terms of the frontyard setback. The zoning code requires a minimum setback of 10 feet from the front and/or street. The proposal would not change the existing building setbacks. Existing buildings 1 and 2 on the south portion of the site would meet the minimum setback requirements,and future building 4 would be set back a minimum of 25 feet from the property lines. The lot coverage is limited to 65 percent and the proposal has a maximum of 35 percent lot coverage based on full build-out of the site. In terms of parking,the applicant is providing 68 spaces, including 3 accessible parking spaces for Washington's ADA compliance. The applicant has indicated that a number of employees live within Renton. Some of them bike to work or take the bus and the Renton Park&Ride lot is within 1/4 mile of this site. The applicant provided a noise assessment which was primarily reviewed during the environmental review process. This study included an assessment of the noise conditions at the existing site of the applicant and at the subject property. The exterior noise level at the existing Renton Coil Spring site was 65 decibels,taken 10 feet from an open door when compressors were running but no metal work was being done. For the proposed site the applicant did intend to confine the manufacturing operations to the south portion of the site to existing buildings 1 and 2. When building 3,the one closest to the residences and closest to S 7th is utilized, it would be occupied by offices. Buildings 1 and 2 are located approximately 200 feet from the property line on S 7th. Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.: LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 4 The consultant reported that noise measurements were taken from the residential area on S 7th in July of this year and the average ambient noise level was 64 decibels. There were higher ambient noise levels noted and that was caused by street traffic volumes on S 7th and background noise from I-405. At the time there were also trucks operating on the subject site so that was noted. The report concluded there was little chance that the relocation of Renton Coil Spring would have an adverse acoustical impact on the residential community; in fact,there would probably be a slight decrease in the noise level and its impacts to the residents to the north as compared to the existing trucking operation. There are adequate public improvements in this area. There are localized storm water problems in the vicinity, but they would not be made worse by this proposal because there are impervious surfaces on the site already. This proposal would reduce the amount of impervious surface by the addition of the landscaping. Staff is recommending approval of Renton Coil Spring subject to several conditions. The conditions are compliance with the ERC's mitigation measures;providing a revised site plan showing the location of the refuse-recyclables area; providing pedestrian access from the main entrance across the fire lane vehicle circulation area to the raised walkway;providing additional landscaping bordering the parking aisles on S 7th Street where there are gaps; installing and maintaining a lawn for the time when the new building would lag behind the use of the other buildings; eliminating excess parking spaces if building 4 is not constructed at this time; and the applicant shall appropriately sign and gate the access to Talbot Road South such that its use is for emergency access only. David Halinen, 10500 NE 8th,#1900,Bellevue,Washington 98004, attorney for applicant, introduced Exhibit 7 regarding withdrawal of the extended permit period. Charles Pepka, P.O. Box 880,Renton,Washington 98057, applicant herein,provided samples of their product and described their qualities. He recited the company's history in Renton, starting in 1949, and their projected growth in the industry because of their titanium expertise and major growth in the market. The springs themselves are coiled and the metal is stamped at the site. He described the testing by the noise consultant. The noise study was done directly across the street in a residential community. He stated they have a very good relationship with the neighbors and have never had a noise complaint. Regarding the work shifts of the 63 people currently employed,presently 50%are on first shift, about 30% on second, and about 20% on third shift. Their goal is to move into buildings 1 and 2 and remodel as soon as possible and then go ahead with the construction of building 3. Building 4 basically would not have much impact during the construction phase on operation inside these buildings. Cooling would be provided in building 1. Building 2 would be used primarily for storage and warehousing and would probably not be cooled. Building 4 would probably be cooled also. Maintaining continuous temperature in the building is preferred for accuracy of machinery. Regarding cleanup of the existing soils on site,Mr. Pepka stated that in 1996 the previous owners removed their fuel and oil tank from the property and they are working with a company called Eco Engineers to complete the process of cleanup. Roger Richert, 9311 SE 36th,#110,Mercer Island,Washington 98040,architect for the applicant, stated that Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.: LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 5 the buildings would first receive cleaning and then the exteriors would be painted in light, clean colors. There would be aesthetically pleasing infill walls installed in the areas where the doors are being removed. Some awnings would be installed over building 2 second story windows where the office area would occur. Architectural definition would be added at the main entry which is the center of the facade of building 1 and 2 that face to the north. This would be a freestanding structure and would be a focal point to signal the main entry. Gerry Edlund, 15005 SE 171st,Renton,Washington 98058, applicant's landscape architect, described the concept for the landscape plan and its relationship to adjacent properties. By adding the requested additional sidewalk area from the main entrance towards the Burnett Avenue linear park, it will be in a sense a park-like setting and an extension of Burnett Park. The proposed plant materials will be long term good material that will be easy to maintain and have a good visual appearance. The entire planting beds would be irrigated so the maintenance would be reasonable. The area of building 4, if it is not built immediately,would be grass and maintained as such. The refuse storage area is ultimately designated to be placed inside the building; if that is not possible, it would be placed on the south corner of the site,farthest away from the residential area. Corey Thomas,Fire Prevention Bureau, City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton, Washington 98055, stated that the access on the westerly portion of the site where a small section of the required fire lane goes around the building does not meet code requirements. As it is a very short section of the roadway, it does not present a major concern to the Fire Department. Buildings 1,2 and 4 will be retrofitted with fire sprinkler systems to mitigate any other safety concerns. Building 3 does not require a fire sprinkler system. Neil Watts,Plan Review Supervisor,Development Services Division,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,Washington 98055, stated that a small portion of the site that has some isolated flooding problems can be handled by the addition of a new catch basin. This site is currently entirely impervious and no changes are expected downstream from this. With the addition of the landscaping,there will be less impervious surface. The project has no requirements in terms of detention or water quality facilities. Regarding the driveway onto Talbot,he described the concerns of the adjacent accesses and increased traffic at this location. This driveway is closer to the intersection of S 7th which creates some potential problems,and because it has access onto S 7th, staff is recommending limiting that driveway to secondary access only through a gated system. In the alternative, limiting it to exit only may be appropriate. Mr. Halinen asked on behalf of the applicant to have an exit-only driveway onto Talbot. He also agreed to a condition that if the City determined there was a safety hazard at a later time,then the applicant would be responsible for the change. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:25 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS&DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.:LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 6 FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Charles Pepka for Renton Coil Spring Company,filed a request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. 6. The subject site is located at 437 S 7th Street. The site is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of S 7th Street and Smithers Avenue South. South of S 7th, Smithers becomes Talbot Road South. 7. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 738 enacted in March 1925. 8. The site is zoned CA(Commercial Arterial), a classification it received in June 1993 with the adoption of Ordinance 4404. 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial, employment generating uses but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 10. The parcel is an almost triangularly shaped parcel defined by the alignments of S 7th, Smithers and the Burlington Northern Railroad rights-of-way. The approximately 2.8 acre parcel has approximately 363 feet of frontage along S 7th. 11. The level parcel has been used for a trucking operation for a long time. There are three buildings on the site, including two with a common wall. The three buildings total approximately 31,000 square feet. The applicant proposes retaining these existing buildings and adding another building of approximately 16,500 square feet. The existing buildings are one and two stories tall with the tallest being approximately 30 feet tall. 12. One building,Building 3, is located in the northwest corner of the site. This building is located within the CA zone's required ten(10)foot setback. Section 4-31-10.4(D)(1)(a)permits a reduced setback "provided that blank walls are not located within the reduced setback." "Blank" is not defined. 13. The other two combined buildings are located more or less across the middle of the site in an"L" configuration. They meet the required setbacks. Building 2 is the eastern building and has a south building line that runs at a diagonal following the property line. Building 1 is the westernmost building and is rectangular in shape. 14. The new building would be tucked into the south side of the crook of the "L." The new building will be an approximately 16,500 square foot,one-story addition. The one story addition will be 22 feet tall. It Charles Pepka - Renton Coil Spring Company File No.: LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 7 will continue the diagonal line of Building 2 but with a jog creating an offset and modulation in the southerly facade. 15. The applicant originally proposed phasing the development of the subject site with the new addition following the conversion of the existing buildings. The applicant has altered the proposal and now will develop the new building in conjunction with the rest of the project. 16. The applicant proposes adding approximately 21,000 square feet of landscaping. Landscaping will be planted along the property lines and particularly in front(north)and to the east of Building 1. The parking area will also have landscaped islands. Integrated into these areas will be employee seating, break and eating areas. 17. There will be parking for 68 vehicles located on the site and there will be truck loading areas with access to bay doors. The mixed use nature of the use creates a parking demand of between 57 and 85 and the 67 proposed appears appropriate. (The change to the timing of the new addition changes some of the original staff analysis.) 18. Pedestrian paths will link the interior of the site with the sidewalks located along the street frontage. 19. An emergency access roadway will circle around the south and west side of the combined Buildings 1, 2 and 3. One portion of the roadway will be somewhat constricted to less than the preferred 20 feet but this is an existing condition that will be continued and the Fire Department has found this acceptable. 20. There would be one driveway along S 7th that would provide both ingress and egress. A second driveway would be located on Talbot. Staff would like this driveway to be restricted to egress only. Staff would like the ability to restrict this driveway further if conditions warrant it. 21. The subject site was used for a truck operation in the past and had on-site gasoline and oil facilities. In addition,the site is packed gravel and over the years contaminants may have reached the soils. The soils will be tested and receive appropriate treatment. 22. The CA zone permits as a hearing examiner Conditional Use: Light manufacturing, including assembly and warehousing of prefabricated parts and finished parts; also including minor finishing work as part of the assembly process. 23. The nature of the proposed use did not clearly fit within staffs definition of"light manufacturing" and therefore,an administrative determination was sought from the Zoning Administrator. It was determined that"light manufacturing"was similar to or equivalent with "light industry." 24. The applicant has been operating in North Renton for quite some time and there have been no complaints from its residential neighbors about the nature of the operation or any concerning noise that might be generated by the use. 25. The area south of 7th is generally zoned CA for a variety of commercial uses. The area north of the site is zoned for residential uses(RM-U), a multiple family designation, although it is generally developed with single family homes. 26. The applicant proposes adding some additional climate control in the new buildings and work areas which should permit the doors to be closed,thereby providing additional noise insulation for any manufacturing aspects of the proposal. Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.: LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 8 CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest,will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-31-36(C)which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking,unless otherwise permitted,will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested conditional use appears justified and should be approved with the conditions enumerated below. 2. Clearly,reusing this idle site will create employment opportunities in this area. The expansion of the existing business will also add new jobs to the general employment base of the City. It will also, clearly, create a void in its current location. The nature of the proposed site,removed from well- traveled or highly visible arterial traffic makes it less likely to be used for retail uses as envisioned by both the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code. Similarly,the nature of the use is such that visibility is less important than an appropriate site with room to support the proposed use and the amenities the applicant would like to include in its overall vision. 3. In addition,the site's location directly south of residential uses could make certain intense,traffic- generating uses less desirable for this site. The more or less self-contained use with only periodic deliveries and pickups of merchandise could make the use a more appropriate neighbor. The fact that the current operation has been in a residential area without problems would appear to indicate that it will continue to be an appropriate neighbor. 4. The proposed use is not precisely found among the outright permitted uses or among those permitted by Conditional Use Permit. An administrative determination by the Zoning Administrators found the use compatible or sufficiently similar to the light industrial uses permitted by Conditional Use Permit. 5. The relocation of the existing business to this site will not create an overconcentration of light manufacturing or industrial uses in this area. It will displace a use that has actually been intrusive. Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.: LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 9 6. It is impossible to avoid saying that almost any redevelopment of the site would be an improvement over current conditions. But,that does not detract from the fact that the setback of Building 3 does not meet the current code. This can be offset by increasing the building details of the facade of this building with architectural trim,banding or other features to soften the facade and introduce interesting elements this close to the street. The introduction of these features will assure that the non-conforming building does not leave a dull, "blank" facade along the street frontage,and thereby comply with the provisions that allow a reduced street setback. 7. Again,the fact that the applicant's current use has not generated any complaints from its current residential neighbors at its current location would appear to suggest that it will continue to be a good neighbor. It should not create any undue impacts on adjacent residential uses. 8. The landscaping will also help to soften the complex of buildings and will definitely be an enhancement to what is currently located on the subject site. 9. The parking and delivery areas appear to provide both safe and adequate maneuvering space. In general,the delivery areas will be internal to the site and should thereby minimize noise that could affect neighboring uses. The parking complement appears appropriate for the entire project which is a mix of office and manufacturing uses. 10. It appears that the internal circulation for vehicles and pedestrians is safe. Links to the surrounding sidewalks are adequate. The proposed driveway along the east frontage of the site may create maneuvering hazards and the City should retain the ability to restrict both ingress and egress at this driveway as necessary to assure the safe functioning of the public right-of-way. 11. The use should not generate inappropriate noise, light or glare. The applicant's proposal to add climate control should also allow most noises to be confined within the buildings behind closed doors. 12. As noted,the landscaping appears to be generous but should be supplemented along S 7th Street to shield car headlights from leaving the site. The residential areas deserve this additional protection. 13. The City services such as water and sewer are adequate to serve the site. The Fire Department has found the emergency access road appropriate. 14. In conclusion,with the expectation that the proposed use in the proposed location will be as neighborly as it has been at its current location and with the overall improvements shown for the rehabilitation of the buildings and the landscaped open space,the proposed use should be appropriate. DECISION: The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The City shall retain the sole discretion to restrict both ingress and egress for the eastern frontage driveway as necessary to assure the safe functioning of the public right-of-way. 2. The applicant shall introduce architectural trim,banding or other features to soften the facade and introduce interesting elements to Building 3. Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.:LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 10 3. The applicant is required to comply with the mitigation measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee threshold determination prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing the location of the refuse/recyclable area. This area must be easily accessible,yet separated from the less intensive residential uses to the north,and would need to be screened from view. 5. The applicant shall revise the site plan to demonstrate an additional pedestrian access from the Talbot road S sidewalk--across the fire/lane/vehicle circulation area to the raised sidewalk near the building entrance the pedestrian crossing could be indicated as a painted crosswalk or alternate paving material could be used to delineate this area. The revised site plan shall be submitted for review and must be approved by the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of any building/construction permits. 6. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to demonstrate additional ornamental plantings along the north property boundary adjacent to S 7th Street. The landscape plan shall be submitted for review and must be approved by the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of any building/construction permits. 7. The property owner shall be responsible for the installation and maintenance—including underground irrigation--of a lawn area on the southwest portion of the site until such time that construction/building permits are issued for future development. ORDERED THIS 10th day of November, 1997. +1161 YeA•jra,t FRED J.KA 'i, •N HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of November, 1997 to the parties of record: Jennifer Henning David Halinen Charles Pepka 200 Mill Avenue S 10500 NE 8th,#1900 P.O.Box 880 Renton,WA 98055 Bellevue,WA 98004 Renton,WA 98057 Roger Richert Gerry Edlund Corey Thomas 9311 SE 36th,#110 15005 SE 171st 200 Mill Avenue S Mercer Island,WA 98040 Renton,WA 98058 Renton,WA 98055 Neil Watts Scott Swinhart Craig Koeppler 200 Mill Avenue S 621 Burnett Avenue S 800 5th Ave.,#3700 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98104 Charles Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company File No.: LUA-97-123,CU-H November 10, 1997 Page 11 Ewing Stringfellow 101 West Olympic Place Seattle,WA 98119 TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of November, 1997 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Administrator Members,Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Art Larson,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren,City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Mayor's Executive Assistant Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,November 24, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact, error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. ..- ...----- ---- • • • .. . • • - ......-'" . • ......• o g)1E: ...-••• J ....•••••. •.• • •:..\IiiCa, . . . .. . ,... \) .,. • .• s..' • .!,: , '" •",._ ,,,,i.; . I.\, e. . .• . • vi:. ,.......!„. .• • ..„: ‘.. e; •1 ' ;1...': , 4.ii "1 ."'.., -: •.- 11 k t / ..... / .'......,/ . ,..1 • 1 1 i i i:. It! . " 1.. . 7i, .. `,..',, . . ..'". • \ • 'V.-, '''• • %I . ;_l;^ u N. . _,.„..--.•:., , , „..•.. .., . • --1 -. , • i• • ... - .• .•-•-,- k .. . ..., ..„ . ... ,t._...._, A, -,. ,... ,.-:•..., .., A , .a .•••,•_.5_____... '.!1 , E g .,,,.,,'• „03 ' 11 -1- '. —.------ .-- :;t.• t 1 W : ••• ZR,•1 gy .\'S....„0, ', p. . ' , . ..5--.•, $4°""" •••-,,, ' 1 ikb-r .- J b ti`..t41C111119 \ • --'•f:' -- I-•. i i --- ;.. 1" :..;.•9 •. .:.• .., . on -, , \ ‘ ° -`11, I --' •ff-- ' --; i-.E 15 •' .;, : :, . R-L F • - 1; --... • --• .5_i4 I,.1.',,_%'_' _9C._1_9 1_9i9.r,,.9'4''9.;I..:.T.....-,.._.II._._.!.'11Il1l..'.L FcI TJI•l:. 0 .tg4f,l li..\g.„t,.. .. ., ............, .. .' ', ..,..... .. • **„••,, .,CE•-0121.7.1.FNAJ I ecrAx.r3a4st. - SHATTUCK ... .•; r ]-- -1I ., .,es ROB(lil .10.01111IT 4. I N tkliairy I r aocru atqz I 1 i id, ••••11=1 \ %,........ IF, g9 U - .____.—.. •----- - I _,,,..kci.,.i. i ei FE"-Elk — g J' v'm P 1-4 ....... ...., \ ..... ..--.. ' f :-. I 11 Ac \ V': • ., 1 1 1 1 j ////, .... . ( I Il'....C'1•11 % , •"."t B.N..r‘ 1 " tC..01'WE.." ii.NE 'WHITWORTH s 1 ..•. •- .. • II .... ,.......err.. '', 5 2IgIVA-1 ..,.., --T.,1_.J ' - ' - ' '- 3.0 Pl-E1 E1 402 TIOig 1 ,. ., . 1.. ; rs %.*•• ... ;; . • • ) i- / ; . -•-.. i- . -.;.-..a., A=..1 --1,•-r.,, • I-7.-CIIMICC \\,\ •••,,,,s•M,,,,IF gr,,,,,,,,,y,,,,,••••••...Tv 1E, //11 I ., I J ,,,,,,„7 ..'' E .1 ,•., . n I-T:41.--I "1 9 19-.) 9 1/ 1„/,,, iv • , ..• ---,, 1 1 -, , ,r1.13 . J . .1 ‘' . • k VINI ,V4 1 . • ... .\‘'.. 10,....3 ) (___.c-.._2 al —+—— - - • MORRIS • Vi It ° -g-crii ' 4., .......4 =--- -,.. ••. 1.1.1 LC.1.1,11 _-•:( ) ____,,,,,:c_2,_ — ,...,,,,,,- • • \ d4H111j;INIE: 16 615'11PIJIM. . ---- ••=—., E SWTHERS .'"' „_I I-- .' 7...-/-6-j 7 1 • H 14 5NicritrJ 1 (0 bt ''D 19gIggita ., , .. r. I., 'ors,, ..--f-L,'. I.: 'a-;'"- • _a ••.,tits —• • • - --,----,7,--;--,__..,---•,..,_ 1 .0,3C•X —ii• '' i• i 1 , . 73 S!7 ? : '-a liZi"'1.1'.‘, •'...::::... < V- .... , • cr.-3.1441/, '-'—f ,t r ...„..--,•-,-.7,1 a\__„.... :r.i./.1...4- -„, ;IT_ c t.,..„.., - 4,.. i s p.ii I;. i „„,,„, / I ... 1 '"'•:'..---1 =Tr' _..,...,"",,_2-:''''72.o.i; • . • 11' ,:I:rs-'---A--.--L, '• r, ktralr, .1 3. 3.i "1,--1 8URNE: ""s" f'14 -17--.76:1(1 ".-• 1 .,,,,..-1M..1.1.1... t 6- .. 4i.-4,"'c I.e... ' ''' ' - M r_ "I'. I----—7-1_ _ — -1 i I— -. . . 1.-..`".-.1.7.. :-:-("t: - . : "15.'• : . ... -. _ '''' ''"--" --..---• ''''''... .,Z4' ..,'2.-.' s 71-,.1•Ni. 111 y\ / -, . 4 Ed 3 : 14,,vi 6"' ---•I.E. I > 1j . I I > 0, 4 -I PI 73/'--u---, •t\ -,,,, ‘N: "--ialmoragerii I n' a I 1 p cn 1 ..--." • - . ./ ... . , • ,,,,-, ..._,, _N, ... .,,,, - .. .. _ . ' .:-..,,,.. );IcVI 7) tit 1 I •I :).J2 ),•.,‘,. Fp 1ft El P 2119/IOU . - : '" --G."), •'. •'.o: •-; 2. . r---.—.71 ., :.:. .., -,b.L.v.iiii .....„1<„, 0 ' : • .„...,1._ ., - 1-= i i-. r .0:-, _.•.,..,3 ERILEOL:., _1:1,,_.P':9 1. 1'il' . . • .. .• . • • . . '4•._4.••..._ •-•... s .s. t i• • i4).•t,c,7•-•t•-,•:),.7.:... . ---------- I,,,,,,•,/.1.1, . • • . • • • • • . K. Allen Frazier o 155 v 642 Morris Ave. NOV 1 01997 Renton, WA 98055 Home Phone(425)277-5203 • Email kafrazier@juno.com CM Of RENTON HEARING EXAMINER November 05, 1997 City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. Renton, WA 98055 Attn.: Ed Kaufman Hearing Examiner Re: Renton Coil&Spring Dear Mr.Kaufman, We are the closest neighbors to the property which Renton Coil&Spring wishes to purchase. We are sending you this letter because we were out-of-state when the hearing occurred regarding the sale of the property and we are very excited about the sale. The present trucking firm that is located on the property has been a sore spot in the neighborhood for several reasons. There's been many traffic problems created when the semi-trucks are parked on Seventh,which is a fairly busy and narrow road. There's continuous,24-hours a day,noise from the trucks pulling in and out,with gates opening and closing, and laborers yelling. (Our neighbors went over there in the middle of the night to make a request for them to quiet down,especially the foul langauge,for their children's sake,but our neighbors were just laughed at.) There is also the pollutants in the air caused.from the trucks and the unsightly property. Renton Coil and Spring will be replacing this with landscaping which will upgrade the City of Renton,especially with City Hall moving nearby,and with quiet for the neighborhood! We are in favor of a decision to approve this applicant. Thank you. • Sincerely, K. Allen Frazier I ............:...:.:.::.:::::...............................:............:...... ....... . . . C` `MMEN.CIN. ::AM;:>:> > >>< >< >< > OUN..... L GHAMIB RS COND FLOOR R NTOI� 1 U C1.�Gl.::: ► ,;:BUILDING • T�'ea''�l�.cat..�.�t.s iste � e ire order�t'..� . t�Ga#rt�rt.n tuber��� �r1d not ri�C ssa � th p de>~ ire wh�Ch.. :...... th.e...w..I.t7.o..h.o.S.rd.....lfoms.w.l�..bo.oslled. ot.ho r1n ..et.the.d..�et�tlort<o;::tho:::Hoaffn . >:Ixgmin.ot.>:::>::::::>:<:::>::>::::>::><:::::»;:::<:: • PROJECT NAME: Renton Coil Spring Company PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to convert a 2.8 acre site at 437 SW 7th Street • from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Renton Coil Spring manufactures small, lightweight titanium springs for use primarily in the aircraft industry. They are presently located in North Renton at 25 Burnett Avenue North, and are seeking a new location to operate their facility due to recent and planned growth. The business employee 53 people and growth over the next seven years envisions 100 employees. Three existing one- and two-story structures totaling approximately 31,000 square feet (Bldg. 1 = 10,900 s.f.; Bldg 2= 13,800 s.f.; Bldg. 3 = 6,000 s.f.)would remain on the site. A new 16,500 square foot one-story addition would be constructed as part of a later phase. The project also requires a conditional use permit for a light manufacturing use in the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. Location: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue South. PROJECT NAME: Liberty Park P-1 Rezone PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-113,R,ECF DESCRIPTION: Environmental review for rezone from Public Use (P-1) zoning to Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning. Location: 1103 Bronson Way North. PROJECT NAME: Cedar River Trail Park Rezone PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-114,R,ECF .DESCRIPTION: Rezone Cedar River Park from its current Public Use (P-1) zoning to Industrial-Heavy (IH) zoning with a"P"suffix attached to designate public ownership. Location: North of North 6th Street. AGNDA.DOC • , _e • 1 City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: October 28, 1997 Project Name: Renton Coil Spring Company Applicant/ Charles Pepka Address: Renton Coil Spring Company • P.O. Box 880 Renton, WA 98057-0880 Owner/ Castagno Brothers • ' Address: Inter Vivos Revocable Trust 434 SW 7th Street , Renton, WA 98057 File Number: LUA-097-123,CU-H, ECF Project Manager: Jennifer Toth Henning • Project Description: The applicant proposes to convert a 2.8 acre site at 437 SW 7th Street from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Renton Coil Spring manufactures small, lightweight titanium springs for use primarily in the aircraft industry. They are presently located in North Renton at 325 Burnett Avenue North, and are seeking a new location to operate their facility due to recent and planned growth. The business employee 53 people and growth over the next seven years envisions 100 employees. Three existing one- and two-story structures totaling approximately 31,000 square feet (Bldg. 1 = 10,900 s.f.; Bldg 2 = 13,800 s.f.; Bldg. 3 = 6,000 s.f.) would remain on the site. A new 16,500 square foot one-story addition would be constructed as part of a later phase. The project also requires a conditional use permit for a light manufacturing use in the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. . Project Location: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue South _..may,, �: •ta, ... fyJ7•'��qq" ,Iir uiu. m Z� lij-_ I ee�rrrz = :. • s n ....n \♦r 'ui s•�'a,:..'° a I4.Q,' , u L. i'® l n m -J v i I ®s m -Tr n ®Z £ ?s roIp. © m:' e• m-In `m ® . . : e 4 P©• r ctlruR u kJ J imretue O.2F- Pd3tl1 t� 0: r r® 1 Qdi '•' ®�'I' sus 4r ®•�L+m�Jai O "® � �L; E.mi vE:c �` ,,, \ ',_ ,j,17 •i si�U Q'1 46, O 4..°, .rs s.it 'Zg �a� ®;o o. �. ; s,...N.a , IL7'� �Sviau Elr_r. 32i_,, c..rt rL�Z7 e+ ©� mix{ y I . !\ i.�' � ur� aS tl 67•H sr 1�� ���u ��' '�� `�iC}./"`.S��eP uE,. � \r c `• - Q lam. r:I p. ( a i fin et p„ ' ®;o'! e.,. l: �, ;�ll�S�i ,EIS �r..i muubcs;:.s .'6 ,,,, j: • • • ..p \ ?„ ,.� n _u ,-• :".flap ©j I�r— W� • yin:°, ` ,/• t' ,r^ eI i L4 i i - • e “ °©� I .2, 'f .+i-..r OOZE °'r. ...� [ /X` :N.° =.i.so. I;� V iS 1 I.. e•'. ©,•P ®7 u� A-51 . a- , ,„., .. Ca !i , ,i F•�'r' I'D!F pI r{ U°•, v77 ©-1 I ,r', / -�S ,. Govl r-a .— JI J. - '� & I ..,n r „P'7,LJ , IIInl ®.•. mac :. , �:•��� • � r-- .ta./ F - ....^.I '_ j 1 1 ,,,!; i Pr �" 5 I-..'71:'R• •1 i n. if T • iLhi: s1T * i , ,v t r ':I0r • lf� \ . ' • City of Renton P/B/pW Department Preliminary Report to the Heating Examiner PRENTON COIL Sp RING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H, EC,F PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 2 of 12 \ , B. GENERAL INFORMATION: \ , 1. Owner I Record: Castagno Brothers • Inter Vivos Revocable Trust • 434 SW 7th Street Renton, WA 98057 2. Zoning Designation: Commercial`Arterial (CA) )1 I 3. Comprehensive Plan Employment Area- Commercial (EAC) :Land Use Designation 4. Existing Site Use: Trucking business . 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: residential--single family homes East: commercial South: commercial • West: commercial/service 6. Access: from South 7th Street, and from Talbot Road South I 7. Site Area: 2.8 acres 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: 30,944 s.f. '\ I New Building Area: 16,500 s.f. Total Building Area: 47,444 s.f. . • C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: , Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date - . • Comprehensive Plan N/A 4498 2/20/95 . Zoning N/A 4404 6/7/93 • Annexation N/A 738 ' 3/26/25 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: ' Water: existing 18-inch water line in South 7th Street, existing 24- inch water line in Talbot Road. Sewer: existing Metro sanitary line in South 7th Street, existing 8- inch extension in Talbot Road Surface Water/Storm Water: existing storm facilities are located in South 7th Street HEXRPT.DOC A • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 3 of 12 2. Fire Protection: per City of Renton Fire Department 3. Transit: Metro/King County transit serves the area. The Renton Park and Ride lot is located within one-quarter mile of the site. Routes 108, 109, 145, 147, 148, 155, 167, 169, 240, 245, 247, 340, 912 • 4. Schools: Not Applicable 5. Recreation: Not Applicable 6. Other: Site is not within the Aquifer Protection Area Zone E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Section 4-31-10.4: Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. 2. Section 4-14: Parking and Loading Ordinance F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element-- Light Industry Policies 2. Land Use Element-- Employment Area- Commercial Policies 3. Land Use Element-- Employment Area - Industrial Policies G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND • The applicant is requesting a conditional use •permit in order to relocate an existing light manufacturing business to a site located in the 400 block of South 7th Street. The Castagno Brothers trucking operation currently occupies the site. Renton Coil Spring proposes to renovate existing buildings on the property and construct an additional 16,500 square foot structure in the future. The future building would be one story, and approximately 22 feet in height. Three existing one- and two-story structures, up to 30 feet in height, are located on the site. These structures represent nearly 31,000 square feet of development. At the present time, Renton Coil Spring is located in North Renton at 325 Burnett Avenue North. Recent growth and forecasts for future growth necessitate relocation of the company. Renton Coil Spring manufacture small light-weight titanium springs that are used primarily in the aircraft industry. Approximately 53 employees presently work at the company, and within the next seven years, the number of employees is anticipated to reach 100. The subject site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA), and designated Employment Area - Commercial by the Comprehensive Plan. The City's Zoning Administrators have determined HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DA IE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 4 of 12 • that the Renton Coil Spring Company is considered to be a "light manufacturing" use for the purposes of defining the use with regard to zoning categories. Light Manufacturing uses are permitted in the CA Zone with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the City's Hearing Examiner. The site is presently covered by buildings or compacted gravel surfaces. The proposal would result in a less intensive use, and the applicant has provided a landscape plan that would add a substantial amount of new landscaping.\ Approximately 21,000 square feet of landscaping would be installed. An additional 16,000 square feet of lawn area would be added to the southwest portion of the site, until such future time\(within 10 years) that a new structure would be built. The existing concrete structures would be renovated and painted. Existing windows would remain, awnings would be added, and all but two of the existing dock-high truck doors would be replaced with infill walls and/or windows. New Building No. 4 would be tilt-up concrete construction with a painted surface. The applicant is requesting an extended approval of the Conditional Use Permit with regard to the future development of a new building. They anticipate that this structure would not be built for seven to ten years, but have requested approval of the conditional use in advance for predictability, prior to exercising their option to purchase the land. A separate letter is attached to this report with the applicant's request. The proposal would include parking for 68 vehicles, and two truck loading areas. A pedestrian access would be provided from South 7th Street to the main building entrance. The site plan indicates two employee break areas with tables and benches, one at the east end of the site, and the other in the southwest corner. Benches would also be provided flanking the entrance to existing Buildings No. 1 and 2. Two dock-high truck doors would continue to be used on the north facade of the existing Building No. 1/2. A ground-level truck door on the east facade of existing Building No. 3 would also continue to be utilized. The proposal features a fire lane around the southern perimeter of the site. Access to the site would be from two points, a main drive to South 7th Street, and a second driveway to Talbot Road South. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW • Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on September 23, 1997 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES The ERC issued the DNS-M with four mitigation measures which the applicant is required to comply with. The mitigation measures are as follows: 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division,prior to the commencement of, and for the duration of the project. Compliance: The applicant will be required to submit a Temporary Erosion Control and Sedimentation Control Plan for review with the construction permit/building permit submittal. The applicant has not yet submitted for additional permits beyond the land use permits. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee for the new structure. The fee shall be calculated based on rates in effect at the time the building permit for the new structure is processed. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of the building permit. HEXRPT.DOC A • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 5 of 12 Compliance: The Fire Mitigation Fee will need to be paid before the a building permit could be issued. 3. The applicant shall be required to limit construction hours to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and Saturdays as arranged, but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. Compliance: The applicant will be required to comply with this mitigation measure during construction. 4. The applicant shall be required to submit a Construction Mitigation Plan to the representative of the Development Services Division, which indicates the haul routes and hours, and includes a traffic control plan. Haul hours are limited to the hours of 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless otherwise approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The Construction Mitigation Plan must be submitted for approval prior to any construction/building permit being issued for the project. Compliance: The applicant will need to submit a Construction Mitigation Plan for review and approval prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits for any phase of the project. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official, file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Section 4-31-36 lists 11 criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on a Conditional Use application. These include the following: (5A) CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMP. PLAN, ZONING CODE& OTHER ORDINANCES: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. (1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT The project site is designated Employment Area - Commercial (EAC) on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Map. Sites with the EAC designation are intended to provide for residential uses and generally auto-oriented commercial uses that require large amount of land or high visibility (Objective LU-AA). This site is clearly not either commercial or residential, nor is it located directly on an arterial. The site is functionally separated from Grady Way (the nearest arterial) and may be inappropriate for commercial uses that require a location on a high traffic corridor. However, a commercial use that would focus on the adjacent residential area, or an expansion of the type of commercial uses located on the arterial at this site may result in greater adverse impacts on the adjacent multi-family area to the north. The proposed use appears to comply with the objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, in light of the administrative determination made that considers the specific proposed use. to be "light manufacturing". Objectives and policies generic to Employment Area designations address light industrial uses rather than light manufacturing. Objective LU-Z states: Promote the development HEXRPT.DOC , City of Renton P/B%PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY I - LUA-97-123, CU-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 I Page 6 112 i of light industries in suitable locations. Policy LU-164 states that light industrial usgs which are allowed should;be less intensive in order to main compatibility with adjacent uses. And, Policy LU-165 states that fight industrial uses should not create noxious conditions such as noise, odors, or traffic which could detract from the office uses allowed in this category. ' The Zoning Administrators have determined that the proposed use meets the intent of the category "light manufcturing" for purposes of deciding whether the use could bye considered in the Commercial Arterial Zone. Furthermore, it appears that the proposed use would generate less noise and traffic than the existing trucking use, and that no odor would be created. II Policies of the Employment Area - Commercial designation that apply to the propos el include: Policy LU-174. Parking areas should be landscaped (including street trees, buffers) berms), especially along the roadways, to reduce the visual impacts. Policy LU-175. Landscape'buffers, additional setbacks, reduced height, and other �I screening devices should bekemployed to reduce the impacts(e.g. visual, noise, odor, light) on adjacent, less intensive uses. Policy LU-181: Development should be designed to be compatible with adjacent, less intensive uses, e.g. lighting, fences, landscaping, setbacks should all be considered during site design. I ', The proposal would provide landscaping around the parking area and along the streets, including berms and street trees consistent with LU-174. The proposed new structure would be located on the southwest corner of the site, farthest from the surrounding streets, and residential areas,\consistent with LU-175. Renovation of existing buildings , and installation of landscaping would be consistent with LU-181. I (2) ZONING CODE - , 1 The site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) and permits light manufacturing uses with a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. (3) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: (a) SETBACKS: I, • The CA Zone requires a minimum setback of 10 feet from the front and/or street, but the setback may be reduced to zero (0) feet through the site plan review process, provided ' that blank walls are not located within the reduced setback. This setback would apply to new structures on the property.', No rear and side yard setbacks are required. ' The proposal would not change the existing building setbacks as structures would be' renovated for Renton Coil Spring. Existing Building No. 3 on the northwest corner.of the site would is presently located within the required setback, and this situation would not change. Existing buildings No.11 and No. 2 (which are share a common wall)would ' meet the minimum setback requirements. Future Building No. 4 would be setback a minimum of 25 feet from the property lines. No minimum setbacks apply to this structure. I (b) HEIGHT 1, Building height is limited to a maximum of 50 feet, but may exceed that height with special approval from the Hearing Examiner or Zoning Administrator (depending on the. ' height and surrounding zoning). Existing structures are one and two-stories in height (maximum height of 30 feet). The proposed structure is currently depicted to be 22 feet in height. HEXRPT.DOC • • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 7 of 12 (c) LOT COVERAGE Lot coverage is limited to 65% but may be increased to 75% if parking is provided within the building or within a parking garage. Existing lot coverage is 21% with the three existing structures. Proposed lot coverage at full site build-out would be 35%. (d) LANDSCAPING A minimum landscaping strip of ten feet(10')is required for lots abutting public streets except where reduced through site plan review. In addition, a pedestrian connection must be provided from a public entrance to the street unless the reviewing official(in this case the Hearing Examiner) determines that the requirement would unduly endanger the pedestrian. The applicant's landscape plan shows a minimum of 10-wide landscaping from the property line to the interior of the site, for those portions of the lot abutting public streets. This landscaping totals 16,256 square feet. An additional lawn area is provided from the edge of the property to the public sidewalk. The applicant is also proposing landscaping in islands within the parking lot (4,470 square feet). A total of 17% of the site would be landscaped with the proposal. A pedestrian connection is depicted on the landscape plan. The connection would include an entry walk from the South 7th Street sidewalk through the parking lot on a raised walkway/parking island, and a hatched crosswalk through the vehicle circulation area. (E) ROOF-TOP EQUIPMENT All site surface mounted utility equipment shall be screened from public view. All operating equipment on the roof of any building shall be enclosed so as to be shielded from view, except for telecommunications equipment. Project drawings do not indicate surface mounted utility equipment or roof equipment. Should any be proposed it would need to be screened per the requirements of the development standards of the CA Zone. (F) REFUSE AND RECYCLABLE COLLECTION &STORAGE Permitted outdoor storage must be screened from adjacent properties and public rights- of-way. Products or bulk material covered by buildings with roofs but without sides shall be considered outside storage and subject to the screening provisions of the CA Zone. All recyclables collections and storage, garbage, refuse or dumpsters contained within specified areas shall be screened, except for access points by a fence or landscaping or some combination thereof. The applicant has stated that no outdoor storage would occur as part of the proposal. Outdoor refuse and recycling container areas are not indicated on the submittals. Staff will recommend as a condition of approval that if these are to be located outside, the garbage/recyclables area would need to be easily accessible, yet separated from the less intensive residential uses to the north, and would need to be screened from view. (4) PARKING AND LOADING ORDINANCE: The proposal is governed by Section 4-14, Parking and Loading Ordinance. Manufacturing requires a minimum of 1 parking space for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, and no more than a maximum of 1.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (but not to include warehousing space). Warehousing is required to have one parking space for each 1,500 square feet of gross floor area. Office use is requires to have a minimum of 3 parking spaces per 1,000 gross feet of gross floor area, HEXRPT.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 8 of 12 and not more than 4.5 parking spaces per each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Modifications are possible if approved by the Department Administrator. The proposal would provide a total 68 parking spaces which would include three; accessible parking spaces (one standard and two van-accessible) per the State of Washington standards. Proposed manufacturing uses in the existing structures would require a minimum of 26 parking spaces and a maximum of 39 spaces. Proposed office use in the existing structure would require an additional 14 minimum to 21 maximum spaces. For the existing structures, the applicant would be required to provide a total of 40 minimum to 60 maximum parking spaces. If the future construction of Building No. 4 is approved, an additional 17 parking spaces minimum and 25 parking spaces maximum would be required. The total number of parking spaces that would be required for all phases of the project (existing and future)would be 57 minimum and 85 maximum. For development that would occur during the initial phase, the applicant would have eight more parking spaces than required by the Code. The applicant could seek a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance, eliminate the parking spaces, or place those spaces in reserve until such time that the addition was constructed. In addition, a ground-level truck loading area is proposed on the east facade of existing Building No. 3, and a dock-high truck loading area would be provided west of the main building entrance on the north side of existing Building No. 2. The ground-level truck door would include a 45-foot clear maneuvering area in front of the door per the Parking and Loading Ordinance. The dock-high doors would have a 100-foot clear maneuvering area per the Code. (5B) COMMUNITY NEED: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: (1) The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or Within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed Renton Coil Spring Company would replace an existing heavy trucking facility. The proposed use would be less intensive than the existing use on the site. Existing buildings would be renovated to accommodate the proposal, landscaping would be installed, and site amenities would be added for the use of the employees. There is not another use of this type in the immediate vicinity. Surrounding uses include residential areas, commercial areas, and automotive sales and services. (2) That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. - The use appears suited to the site, given the intent to reuse structures, and due to the less intensive nature of the facility given current site use. The applicant has submitted landscaping plans which accomplish the buffering and screening intended for projects with this land use and zoning designation. (5C) EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: (1) Lot Coverage: Lot coverage shall conform to the requirements of zone in which the proposed use is to be located. As mentioned previously, the lot coverage of the site is presently 21%. The renovation of the existing structures would not result in any change to the lot coverage. Future HEXRPT.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 9 of 12 construction of new Building No. 4 would increase the total lot coverage to 35%, which is below the 65% limitation of the CA Zone. (2) Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. The proposal would meet minimum setbacks of 10 feet from the street/front except for existing Building No. 3,which is presently approximately 3 feet from the South 7th Street property line. The proposal would not change this existing situation. No side or rear yard setbacks are specified in the CA Zone. (3) Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, belltowers, public utility antennas or similar structure may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. • Building heights should be related to surrounding used in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. The height of the existing structures is between 22 and 30 feet. The proposed structure is currently proposed to be 22 feet in height. The CA Zone permits heights of up to 50 feet. (5D) COMPATIBILITY: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. (Ord 3599, 1-11-82) The proposal would utilize existing structures that have been located on the site for a number of years. The site is located across South 7th.Street from parcels currently uses for single family and some multi-family development, but these areas are designated/zoned for future multi- family residential use. The site is also north of and adjacent to areas intended for commercial, retail and service uses (CA Zone). Heights permitted in the multi-family residential zone (RM-U) are up to ten stories or 95 feet. Heights in the commercial zone (CA) are 50 feet. The proposed height of 30 feet maximum is in keeping with permitted heights. Scale of the proposed structure would not impact the residential area due to its location on the southwest portion of the site, closest to the commercial area and farthest from the residential area. (5E) PARKING: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy-five percent(75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone, in which the proposed use is located, if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. (Ord.3903, 4-22-85) • See Section (5A)(4) above for a discussion of compliance with the Parking and Loading Ordinance. (5F) TRAFFIC: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. The applicant would provide parking on the north portion of the site. Sixty-eight parking spaces are proposed in double-loaded head-in parking. Aisle width would meet the standard of 24 feet. The proposal includes a looped emergency/fire lane around the southwest portion of the site. Vehicles would enter and exit the site from South 7th Street and from Talbot Road South. Pedestrians would access the front entrance of the main structure via a raised walkway HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H,ECF II I PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 10 of 12 connecting with the sidewalk on South 7th Street. The walkway would be incorporated into a ' I raised parking island within the parking lot, and a painted crosswalk area would guide pedestrians across the vehicle circulation area. A second raised walkway would lead from the building to the sidewalk on Talbot Road South to the east. However, no painted crossing area is ill proposed across the emergency/service loop or behind the parking spaces on the east side of existing Building No. 1. Staff will recommend that the applicant be required to provide additional pedestrian areas delineated from the Talbot Road South sidewalk access to the raised sidewalk. (5G) NOISE, GLARE: Potential noise, light and glare impacts',shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed (Il use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse it storage areas. The applicant has provided a brief noise assessment conducted in July, 1997 by an acoustical engineer. The study included an assessment of existing noise conditions at the existing site of Renton Coil Spring (325 Burnett Avenue North) and existing background noise at the future project location (423 and 437 South 7th',Street). The exterior noise level at the existing Renton Coil Spring Company 10 feet from the open door when compressors were running, but no metal work was being done,was 65 dBA. Thel noise level at private residences across Burnett Street was measured to be 51 dBA. For the proposed site, the applicant intends to confine the manufacturing operations to the existing buildings Nos. 1 and 2. When Building No 3 (adjacent to South 7th) is utilized, it would be occupied by offices. Buildings No. 1 and 2 are located approximately 200 feet south of South 7th Street. The consultant reported thatlnoise measurements were taken from the residential area located on the north side of South 7th Street on July 29, 1997 and that the average ambient noise level was 64 dBA. Higher ambient noise levels were noted to be caused by street traffic volumes on SW 7th Street, and background noise from 1-405. In addition, some existing semi- truck traffic was noted going in and out of the trucking facility during the measurement period. The consultant's report concludes that there is little chance that the,relocation of Renton Coil Spring would have an adverse acoustical impact on the residential community on the north side of South 7th Street. Furthermore, the consultant states that the'relocation of Renton Coil Spring could result in a slight decrease in ambient noise level at the residences to the north, since the trucking operation would no longer occupy the site. While Renton Coil Spring would have some truck trips associated with pick-up and delivery,this would be fewer than existing 150 to 180 truck trips generated per week by the existing trucking • operation. Noise would also be expected to result during construction of the proposal, and for this reason, the ERC imposed a.mitigation measure to limit days/hours of construction. Project lighting would not be expected to impact the surrounding area. The.applicant would be required to submit a lighting plan subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of a building permit. (5H) LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by building or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The proposal would result in the replacement of compacted gravel areas with nearly 21,000 square feet of landscaping. The ornamental landscaping would consist of trees, shrubs, A groundcover, naturalized perennials, and lawn areas. Landscaping would provide a buffer from the two adjacent streets, and would provide a separation between parking areas and the sidewalk on South 7th Street. Landscaping would]also be installed in planting beds and islands around HEXRPT.DOC L � • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Heating Examiner PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 11 of 12 the existing and proposed buildings. The area reserved for future building No. 4 would be planed in an additional 16,000 square feet of lawn, and would be maintained by the owner. Staff will recommend as a condition of approval that additional landscaping be installed on the north portion of the site adjacent to South 7th Street, along the drive aisles of the parking lot. In addition, staff will recommend that the applicant be required to install and maintain the lawn area proposed to occupy the site of future Building No. 4. (51) ACCESSORY USES: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. Not applicable. (5J) CONVERSION: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. The conversion of the structures would not be a conversion to a conditional use structure. The actual use rather than the structure is the subject of this conditional use permit hearing. (5K) PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed use and location shall be adequately,served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities, and/or services. The site is adequately served by City of Renton utilities and emergency services. Localized stormwater problems experienced in the area would not be made worse with the proposal, since the site is compacted gravel and is considered to be impervious at this time. The proposal would substantially reduce the amount of impervious surface through the installation of approximately 21,000 square feet of new site landscaping and 16,000 square feet of interim lawn area. H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Renton Coil Spring Company, Project File No. LUA-97-123, CU-H,• ECF subject to the following conditions: • (1) Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with th.e Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination prior to the issuance of a building permit. (2). Outdoor Refuse and Recycling: The applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing the location of the refuse/recyclables area. This area must be easily accessible, yet separated from the less intensive residential uses to the north, and would need to be.screened from view. (3) Pedestrian Access: The applicant shall revise the site plan to demonstrate an additional pedestrian access from the Talbot Road South sidewalk-- across the fire/lane/vehicle circulation area to the raised sidewalk near the building entrance. The pedestrian crossing could be indicated as a painted crosswalk or alternate paving material could be used to delineate this area. The revised site plan shall be submitted for review and must be approved by the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of any building/construction permits. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H,ECE PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 12 of 12 (4) Landscaping: The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to demonstrate additional ornamental plantings along the north property boundary adjacent to South 7th Street. The landscape plan shall be submitted for review and must be approved by the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of any building/construction permits. (5) Installation and Maintenance of L6wn: The property owner shall be responsible for the installation and maintenance-- including underground irrigation -- of a lawn area on the southwest portion of the site until such time that construction/building permits are issued for future development. Parking: The applicant shall either eliminate sixparking spaces from the proposal or seek a (6) PP� I P p parking modification in order to exceed the maximum number permitted by the Parking and Loading �I Ordinance. The parking spaces may be placed in a reserve and landscaped until such time that the new I building is constructed on the southwest portion of the site. (7) Future Environmental Review: The applicant shall be required to apply for new environmental review for future Building No. 4 if the application for a building permit occurs more than three years from the date of the environmental determination -'mitigated (9/23/97). I I • i I II II I I I I � I . li HEXRPT.DOC - HALINEN LAW OFFICES,P.S. A Professional Service Corporation David L.Halinen,P.E._ Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building (206)443-4684 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Fax(206)646-3467 Bellevue,Washington 98004 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING August 18, 1997 CITv PEWIT. Mr. Fred Kaufman City of Renton Hearing Examiner AUG 1 3 1997 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RECEIVED RE: Renton Coil Spring Company's Application for a Conditional Use Permit. for Phased Development of the 2.8-Acre CA-Zoned Site Located at S. 7th Street and Talbot Road South REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL TIME DURATION WITHIN WHICH TO IMPLEMENT THE PROPOSED PHASED DEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. Examiner: I am writingon behalf of myclient, Renton Coil Spring Company "RCS" regard to its P g P Y( )� ing request for a conditional use permit. Pursuant to RMC 4-18-14E (copy attached), RCS hereby requests a ten-year period within which to secure a City of Renton building permit.for the new building proposed on the site. That building is referred to as "Building 4" in the conditional use permit application package. This special request is made because RCS's forecasted business growth indicates the need for phased development of the site. (Phased development projects are a category of projects for which the last sentence of RMC 4-18-14E authorizes the Examiner to establish approval time frames that exceed that code section's ordinary time frames.) Specifically, RCS forecasts growth of its business over the next decade that corresponds to a need for Building 4 in about 7 years. The three existing buildings on the site, which RCS plans to immediately use following City approval, are anticipated to meet the company's building space needs up to that point in time. A ten-year conditional use permit period is requested for Building 4 because of the uncertainties of such long-term business forecasting (i.e., the building may prove to be needed a few years earlier or later). Thank you for your anticipated review of this'request. Please let me know if you need additional information. Sincerely, HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. g.04)"" rfia 4:t-'2-4/ David L. Ha inen cc: Renton Coil Spring Company (via telecopier) Attn: Charles Pepka Roger Richert, AIA, Richert& Associates (via telecopier) D:\CF\2353\001\KAUFMAN.LT1 • . CITY OF RENTON • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF APPLICANT: Charles Pepca PROJECT NAME: Renton Coil Spring Company DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Charles Pepka, requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 square feet would remain on . site. Building No. 1 is 10,933 square feet, Building No. 2 is 13,817 square feet, and Building No. 3 is •6,194 square feet in size. A new 16,500 square foot addition (Building.No. 4) would be constructed on ,I the southwest portion of the site as part of a later phase. Parking would be modified and approximately 20,000 square feet of new landscaping would be installed as part of the project. The project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL , ; SW corner of South 7thStreet and Smithers Avenue `a; • Mitigation Measures: . 1 ' 1. • Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the • • representative of the Development Services Division, prior to the:commencement of, and for the� • 1 • duration,of the project. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee for the new structure. The fee shall be calculated based on rates in effect at the time the building permit for the new structure is processed. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to..the issuance of the building permit. • 3. The applicant shall be required to limit construction hours to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and Saturdays as arranged, but no hours in excess of the weekday 1 hours, and no Sunday construction... • 4. The applicant shall be required to submit a Construction Mitigation Plan to the representative of the Development Services Division,which indicates the haul routes and hours, and includes a traffic control plan. Haul hours are limited to the hours of 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless otherwise approved in advance by the Development.Services Division. The Construction • Mitigation Plan must be submitted for approval prior to any construction/building permit being ' issued for the project. 1 • • •• i • • • • • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF APPLICANT: Charles Pepca PROJECT NAME: Renton Coil Spring Company DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Charles Pepka, requests environmental review • and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 square feet would remain on site. Building No. 1 is 10,933 square feet, Building No. 2 is 13,817 square feet, and Building No. 3 is 6,194 square feet in size. A new 16,500 square foot addition (Building No. 4) would be constructed on the southwest portion of the site as part of a later.phase...Parking would be modified and approximately 20,000 square feet of new landscaping would be installed as part of the project. The project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. _ LOCATION OF PROPOSAL ,;.,. SW comer of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue Advisory Notes to Applicant: jf" :1 • • .sue The following notes are supplemental Information provided In conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these:notes'are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. I 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. .. . .. .•..., .r Police Department . . 2. Police estimate 8.53 call for service annually,,based on the size of the proposed addition. 3. All exterior doors need heavy-duty dead-bolt locks to help prevent burglary. Any glass doors need an application of security film or shatter-resistant.glass--to help.prevent burglaries. Parking lot lighting and the exterior of the buildings need security lighting. 4. During construction, it is recommended that the building site be fenced in with portable security fencing. This would help to deter theft of building materials and tools. All materials and tools will need to be secured when not in use. Theft and burglary of construction sites is one of the most commonly reported crimes in Renton. Fire Prevention • 5. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 gallons per minute (gpm). Five fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150400t of the proposed structure and four fire hydrants are required within 300-feet oft he structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 6. The applicant is subject to the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee as stated in the Mitigation Measures. • 7. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout both the new and existing • structure. 8. The applicant is required to submit a hazardous material inventory statement and comply with all requirements for the storage and use of hazardous materials. . Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 2 - Parks • 9. Landscaping outside of the property line is to be maintained by the property owner. 10. Sidewalk connections to the Burnett Avenue Linear Park should be provided. 11. The use of ecology block with cyclone fencing is not the most aesthetically pleasing if it is visible from Grady Way. Other alternatives should be investigated. • Building Department II . 12. Maintain occupancy separation for existing Building No.2. it 13. Structural engineering is required for all upgrades. 14. All State-mandated accessibility requirements must be complied with. 15. The applicant shall provide a soils report from a qualified engineer for new Building No. 4, prior to the building permit submittal. . Utilities —Water 16 There is an existing 18-inch diameter water line in S 7th Street and a 24-inch diameter water line in Talbot Road. Fire flow is modeled in excess of 8000 gpm with a static pressure of 70 psi. it 17. The System Development Charge has never been paid for this site. If additional meters are installed on this site the fee will be assessed with a redevelopment credit. This fee shall be determined with the final plans. Utilities—Sanitary Sewer s r:rr.;. • 18. There is an existing large diameter Metro sanitary:sewer line in South 7th Street with an 8-inch diameter extension in Talbot Road. : ".;a>ti -: :r:_ 19. The System Development Charge has never,been paid for this site. If additional meters are installed on this site the fee will be assessed with a'redevelopment credit. This fee shall be determined with the final plans. • = 20. An eight foot'(8)wide utility easement along the eastern property line is required prior to any permit it being issued for maintenance of the existing sewer line. Utilities—Stormwater 21.A limited level one drainage study was submitted with the application. Exemptions and thresholds of the final design shall be in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted II by the City of Renton. i! 22. There is no net increase in impervious surface for this site, so the Surface Water SDC is not triggered. Full street improvements including, but not limited to, paving, sidewalks, curb &gutter,street signs and street lights are required if not already existing. Upgrades or repair to city standards may be required. Plan Review—Transportation 23. A traffic study prepared by David Hamlen and Associates (August 5, 1997)shows no net increase in average daily trips for this proposal. Current use as a trucking facility generates the same or more daily trips than the proposed use. Therefore, no traffic mitigation fee is warranted. . i • • • . . .• • • • Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 3 • Plan Review—General 24. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 25. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings,two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. 26. Temporary Erosion Control, most particularly mud and dust control, shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 27. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 28. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. Development Services—Current Planning 29. The project site is zoned CA—Commercial Arterial.• • 't • • CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: September 12, 1997 To: Jennifer Toth Henning From: Kayren K. Kittrick, Plan Review)I? Subject: Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123, CU-H, ECF EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER - There is an existing 18-inch diameter water line in S 7th Street and a 24-inch diameter water line in Talbot Road. Fire flow is modeled in excess of 8000 gpm with a static pressure of 70 psi. SEWER There is an existing large diameter Metro sanitary sewer line in SW 7th Street with an 8-inch diameter extension in Talbot Road. STORM A limited level one drainage study was submitted with the application. Exemptions and thresholds of the final design shall be in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. STREETS Full street improvements including, but not limited to, paving, sidewalks, curb & gutter, street signs and street lights are required if not already existing. Upgrades or repair to city standards may be required. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The System Development Charge has never been paid for this site. If additional meters are installed on this site the fee will be assessed with a redevelopment credit. This fee shall be determined with the final plans . SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge has never been paid for this site. If additional meters are installed on this site the fee will be assessed with a redevelopment credit. This fee IJ shall be determined with the final plans . SURFACE WATER 1. There is no net increase in impervious surface for this site, so the Surface Water SDC is not triggered. NI COILGF.DOC ' • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: GA1/�b1'�vUllC#ldfl Sew Li COMMENTS DUE: 9/10/97 .j OF APPLICATION NO: LUA97-123,CU-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/997 4/- .'1', QV APPLICANT: Charles F. Pepka PROJECT MANAGER: Jennife1c79th Hennihe 49,7 `ir PROJECT TITLE: Renton Coil Spring Company WORK ORDER NO: 78268 'L)ii,. . V LOCATION: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue �WON SITE AREA: 2.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 30,944 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 s.f.would remain on site. A new 16,5000 s.f. addition would be constructed as part of a later phase. Project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More ' Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ' • C. CODE-RELATEQ.COMMENTS ..e.44 e 44,44.„_304.....et).s..,,,4.),p)e,,_.‘___,../.6..., . „,:::,..„ ._. I5,;.,471074.,,,,r. ./e--- -Ai26 "-. -i-l-d-74 ‘ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas where add , al information Is needed to prope y assess this proposal. gin/f 7 "nature o Direct r A orized Representative Date Rev.10/93 Y CITY OF RENTON v,a, e°� FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ` �� MEMORANDUM I INTO DATE: September 2, 1997 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Code-Related Comments for Renton'Coil Spring 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 gpm. Five fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and four fire hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of new building area only: 16,500 square feet x $0.52 = $8,580.00 This fee is payable at the time of building permit issuance. 3.. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout both the new and existing structure. 4. Access is acceptable as proposed. 5. Applicant shall complete a hazardous material inventory statement and comply with all requirements for the storage and use of hazardous material. CT:ss Precom City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: vtAtte COMMENTS DUE: 9/10/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-123,CU-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/997 APPLICANT: Charles F. Pepka PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Renton Coil Spring Company WORK ORDER NO: 78268 . LOCATION: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue SITE AREA 2.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 30,944 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 s.f.would remain on site. A new 16,5000 s.f. addition would be constructed as part of a later phase. Project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable Moro Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare _Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities 1 Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services ✓ _ Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 53 police Wits e,5-bimtca ,cnn ua l I y, bake on v te. Si 3t 41/u apU l t ail (ex toter doC(5 ivy hea vt -duty ate-by t- ocKs to hu • foretscnt 1 Wgjr,�y . ,and glass ea s col CUtJ Lp ;It cat.'6on r• �cecv?itc/ '//12v Dr sha,�r-- res i s ta.n t- ; a, also mt . 7-fru. reilcr I 1015 f_. , g, ior Ob 04 lain madecr2i a -el l 1 . p UWl i e LQi + On I Ai. cam n . ,c.l 1 S;to h� enc.�cL t W h., 'fa,bLe. secto f�cl Ma r II Iu p alto ,htoi- hL; It tnc /ia43 -- *xls . 01( mataals i--- icas U< !/ ilteLl tip be S eavad. wh i rat in u.Se. T A/6f aM Lt an .' Con Ka.c bn S% 0 is tom. c6 au most u�Gc j- a A rvr Rein1 . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional Information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. na ure of Director Aut riz Representative Date q40 R-7 __.._---_ Rev.10/93 • • • • I N I 517E AREA DES'-RIPTIf1N5 • FIRE NYORANf .....m.c..,•. s«.. 6. =-i.LSQUTH 7TH 5TREET ep-I ,° m,�„Peiree 'a3 21 rm / __, .... . 1I. 4. > .. ............... ,,...,......, IrAraG. MASKetRa rWI m SEGOJt.�.4 BJILDII•G N —J .®��I �,_ .� - _ 0 .... .,a.p.�.�..,K�,�, W 5 70 EOM L.Iffit. movereD mVT LAM • W _(� .«."•-C I I" _P////ter—._, ..,... ' aa`�° �. .k _ . .A .. • • • • ...... AI ' 1 c cl,Icicll I°"�K"•I o . •':• AUTOMOTIVE i 1' J`',- m j o �...o..,.x.� @ A. � ,� •L Sa•TZO Me...•.. �. _ MOVERS i -t--I--i ' I( / f(/I N (PI 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1�1 1 1 k r—•� • ,�� o W • I //WY: �1 "i n — 1 IN {-'.�.r...mraa n �I • a • GI WI,eertri In ' • ) --- ..Q.,• IELOGN?TN 6. ,/ 1 NILG D1 N 1 0 .�� PI I 7. BUILDING N a n_ • E. oat) OT S o s^ V o SCALE I"•30' O. • - Za g . a AUGUST 1997 W N • F. es' 7. EXIT YXISTING RUll DING L s EXIT (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) - • 6,194 s.f. `5i EXIT MAIN ENTRY i1 FRIDT FLO011 PLAN a.IT ' • fo NEW PROPOSED BUILDING R4 EXIT (LIGHT MANUFACTURING: LIGHT WIRE AUTOMATIC SPRING COILING & FINISHING) 16,500 s.f. 7. - s 0rtO WALLS Pt wot tr J` a _ EXIT EXIT I 1 //I \ I I EXIT \ I I/ I \L'Toss 001,77r�u PPd..® `_ EXISTING BUILDING #2 \\ I / I I I '...... a...%.4�I^°. (E%ISTIN i OFFICES) EXISTING BUII DING d1 1// 1 I EXIST)II BUS DIN}L' N7 I i 4,600 s.f. ss..,III g (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) )4 I I (EXISTING LOADINtI BAYS) I 10,933 s.f. 1 // 1\� I I 91.217 s.f. I I Iil I/ I III 17 //I 1 1 I 1 I 1 ii 9�1IN 1 1111 I I I v I I I a re Doors st Do ML a Ptn,.cm NEW —� ffi .cmc,r�ixP.vsWe POa>,MIS WO"rOOS;19. ENTRY ucw0 ROM MOW _ SECOND FLOOR PUN +_ FRi_T FLOOR pLAN IOW I4a• ' IL RENTON CO SPRING COMPANY �e I RA P7 was GENERALZED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS RICHERT & ASSOCIATES D.:D. I e 7„ 434 S.W.7TH ST. R ON,WA.98057 ARCHITECTS PLANNERS SHEET Issue ro RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY .325 BURNETT AVE.N.,BENIGN.WA.98057 A 9311 Southeast 361h ST. j110 phone: (206)232-1700 /L-, FLOOR PLANS Mercer Island, Wa. 98040-3799 foe: (206)232-1706 — s==—�——=_ — - .SW MD nmNG_If1 . \ a.°LmErm / - I \ EAST ELEVATION �Vere P IV SNG TOG. .,._<v.un.a smn ,,Ta' • I I ooma / 7 tu�J / �coxuaTC J N N • I WEST ELEVATION eTRW WO _ -- RIMMED erMTO woo. - DESIGN INTENT-NEW ENTRY - - - A SIC.IURE S UCTURE THAT COLY P cna c5P _ -_ _ - - SSIa - - THE RENTON COL SPRING COUP.'AND SCHAL _ - - ----- Emma R.aG.s 1101 1_ _ THE TnnIGES PAN RC STRUCTURE - - PROPOSED 1.u s as WAS BC MEOWED CON THE NEN ENTRE STEPS AND MIA.ADDS RAMP.a MIL BE A WW INE STRUCTURE WU.BE CONSTRUCTED FROM 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 11 111 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 J 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Will j 1 1 1 11111111111111 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 11 11 ill • pGaSm TTmuiw STEEL It.UDAL ROM. � . ,i k ' I I- l iI- . I"' �---�- �-- ",` 1 - 'IN' `) 1 *DDT. .1.01 CD I �- I APO 01.0 DOOM TO MO.A as -H ` i _ i _, �osro IRO(DOCKS \ \\\ I I \ �AT MSC C.unc OM NORTH THESE Taon TAu T[wvm TmT.a Tact ro s iarcm V ru a TEnAEm NARK NORTH ELEVATION- .B.P.:11 O G =� �%a MOMS .a.PD..BOPS Iun11111111u11i 1 I I I I(II I III 1 I 11I 111 1un111u111u 11111111uu111 uu111111111111 uulluluull I I I I I I I+U. • ®®� � �_ yr — ii � ® off III%a,®� � Oi.®� iiIO�_mi — _ - / \\`AOEOR PAMEG INC. BUILDING #1 & 2 PCP..WEINTARCA.PLUS.TOL SOUTH ELEVATIONNIA °• EXTERIOR C L�LVATIOGJ5 ..LE.aYOP..aa. • SCAM: Tic-E•-? ..P 1 RA 07-9GI9 •Iwi� ;, RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY RICHERT & ASSOCIATES - "° N GENERALIZED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS WR I en-97 110.1E 434 S.W.TM ST.RENTON,WA.96057 ARCHITECTS PLANNERS SHEET ISSUE CS ROWE/RECT..AR .m ROOFTOP CwvuENT TO BE SCREDED RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY 325 BURNETT AVE.N.,RENTON,WA.98057 9311 Southeast 36th ST. #110 Phone:(206)232-1700 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Mercer Island. WD. 98040-3799 Tax:(206) 232-1706 • • • . . . • • • j N —ACaoa HMCO R. u a.OF umc• SOUTH ELEVATION • j N • �AC9M FARM ago • AT BM 9r KC. WEST ELEVATION BUILDING #4 • EXTERIOR ELEV1 TION3 scar.. 1/r-r-B f • a ter m �• IMMO ao- aos .�K.— ' I 1 1 1 I I� I I 1 1 I 1 E 11.1 —.k oat oarnr I� EAST ELEVATION n'`""'"t' SOUTH ELEVATION IIII IIII IIII WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION • BUILDING #3 EXTERIOR IELEVATIOHO • scat,: it-r-e a < Av 1 I RA 91-pON , .RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY RICHERT & ASSOCIATES aR CENER1J2E0 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS pia I e-1-91 am sr nsc ARDs MO Roma Ea�aar TO cc scam.. 434 S.W.7m ST.F�ON,WA 98057 ARCHITECTS PLANNERS SHEET ISSUE • RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY . 325 BIRiNETT AVE.N.,RENTON,WA.98057 9311 Southeast 36th ST. 1110 phone:(206)232-1700 %L,l • EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Mercer Island. Wa. 98040-3799 fax:(206)232-1706 • • • PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF ITEMEEMS '" • SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. iiiMIMMIN CITY OF RENTON, STATE OF WASHINGTON = 1=1 g It�N • ION I I W I • FIRE HYDRANT 1> TH •rOLLND Dr+C RCN Rti([.)260 1 ¢ I NEW WATER MN WATER 065ECDDV I Q I oCADw a TICK m NE C•\ '''My rL.2J IO'-2.'LUP La Ln Yuri'EOYNEcnOIT x JD' 1 ]0' ('NS'),CV M?UN[ w1 y u-y't\ CONNECT AND ExrcwD SrLRu i' MAROC AVE S a S lln SI DRAM!O PROPOSED 91C. Rul R-Iflr. ,W`I M CLR XC T9-IJ-3 GRAPHIC SCALE Y N/.COR 19-22, I 1 My n.I.J.'6-[ FpLNp�'Pm M[DNG JD• No- Rai CL•12.SI _ 6.96E PCR Or(O ^ -- BRA TACK MLEAD/ I- I �• N by(l/92J T01J2J"W Or M /�_. TIVV LL.2666'-6 I A/!/�D JOpgOD Q I'^I m CASE L)/9)J t--�t�- t� ft [O119-SJ-S Y wLLI DI FM I • £ -, Lai wee o • ESI g -q .: , Y4 SOUTH 7fh STREET $ ., urmDlDesKRLW I ny _4_71.trie., mil;? I SURVEY NOTE: qg •�-�X_�'l1I� •-- ) W 1 IewySi of Br.Rmct_n x6tee'LYUS) _ Msrwuu[ND NINON ror,L srAnoN oTM-wrac (/1 - - r �'lI, 29]' a a_t. _-- _ �• Do2r. (3 SECOND INSIRUur'1. Q • wag' uEM00 USW:FIELD TRAYERSC wt N ACTUAL R G, G�G�;-O,aTc r16 c _ O c ,'^ c 6 - l�W I 'air,ArC22.LSUREUENTs AND ANC1C5 •4.1 o- > �r.....�.L ,L. _®a-1.9' •., :,`S. wAC!J)-rJO-DID - ..4Agy 9TK•�;�� -p�••,'•�.L �� .DATE OF SURVEY:JULY 199) RT E .r�..yr� �7 t♦•�a - l BASS OF BCAPM6. NOR III IINC OWI INC NC I% IS y �r ••�� 1 . 6J.BO.r ry 4 4 - ' \•.,N.In �+ SEC 19-SJ-3 CN B9L1'J6-wJ - px•®_2)�, I ,� - a BCNCNuwRK:CITY OF NEWTON NON/192P.J'BRASS DISK Lu a;. n+ _ _ STAUPED I G C[WNIv SUR\Er uLWUUNET EN-6r 92l- ofn-)361'-'II k IV niva ; A- DC 5B'O. Il` 40RALK ON Fe Ewsl SIO[OF RAMILR w\i S LOCATED m N /WATER YP. I l l i IA. _ {j'r - •m•.. Or CB ORT SIDE OF SOt(IMCRLY ORwY Ar 6"RUNER"E s Q ¢� - .= x v •00' t•' t fl n51 ELCVA nav•2).B)(B..9u) < :Y �F CB J i�_ HCW[H '- r n•R • •J, .. ¢ o MY[t )660'-6-MtsW T•'• J S u rev CL.26 JJ-r 1 i -W XPAPA lOP u N[W CB I EY NOR: I r50„. ,r M �i� cs All Ir>.a Es ss um ANr uNOLaceamD ummrs vIDAN HEREON ARE 9AXO saa. .h Ft.. / y It.29. I w" UPON WORYATION PROW.BY OP..row.(NGRLE(RS >see I w ca+M x rn / .•ji r -1 '���: Giall ,7-£Q II ,•> 1 Qv n.n JJ'-6•Nas -}, ��ttso NE PONS 119 OR Asswr HARP,FOR �1_p I� • IN 1 .J.iM'JJ' 'IIIYY'((�•I�I�YI.11 ,I•Ca 1 1 milli �1G9.1. S .LLD 00. a O Y, p I!J'S5'29• I N 'O WV TT- er-6'[ _° /-15--I -I I__ �i� 25D. `kI -\ �1. 906. I` LEGEND (EXIST.) %///t ' //////7.1//_,Y--:;-•O1 ■ 82.5 r� •:r,¢m•' I 9 r.swN Q OMINOUS rat[ 3 y ((f I o NEW FN l 1 ''IL•k O� p CX CATCH BASIN trot'I OA6 j o c I o w- n•• • 1 ,•\ ® CX CATCH BARN r•PC 2 1- C.."IRCC ` 8. V 4 W'.1-• 6Y I I s catty\�• L A \ • .• R.ICR D9ASPAM 01111 IN % r / �I MEMBWOM .A an T a a too 9 i FOB DR.ERR o una"Par i (/, I. LLR��[[C''wI_ r.;, ' .�..-.-I��/��III�� ■� wp ¢ 'a �• o t RArra eLD.at' CNt ll '14r • .• I II - PD •� SD ..„,,..,,,•., , �' la n'���:� �JJ',`x.*:. .;,¢^: lJ1 a CO !![[PHORC GBNATE U� ROCAENY I• ...~ I X. _ + . , F 1 f d ® CNN(0 GAS ,n uBNArc 6 uuR M uu -` I /.�c. •� •% "" °I• s suRr,cr BRASS YcwuurNr • CI J o ,.Ely. a//f w�'S,7 OY TEl(PNONE YANIICLE • TORSO 01619 a(20 r W I : R •I BUILDING N I />,., OO POKR mar D'Law PIPE ¢3 0� 5 aJ2a%i J ▪ LIDO at' I CI �� i �` 1 wuc RUJt'xrAM m.i - .•$.0.. \'.'.`, a ® „OM..au C 7 lI., " • K..„.NT NAOS,1 TO MIME Aaeo �••N • RXN n-N r.ee \ ¢ PrOCSIWAN RD.Burrm POLE J P !IF.,♦ ; TO sbrEM i / my n-21.99E-fl'Nas 9GN / COIF.LO03yrt1 6 / • - ILO POST SRN a;; \t L \ TRW.LNGiKW BD. • L.�-.3 : • B////// / L, „/.,...���• f� y1 // ?B cnsnxc[carO6r {NN, BLOCK MALL. V h \ /-" CL LEGEND (NEW ITICSPI \A'<< / B�l I I� I (wc Nrw STORAI DRAIN I I'�•L I o Anal" PROPOSE / �'' ■ NEW CATCH BROW I `L w FN N• \ Bt11DINGM:,w64 DI rLDD�\ / NCI CO '4R.0 t�. NEW W1IL H M4IM I_r C • 3N SNl I L E--^ NL W SILL WALK l J J I NEW FN. ' M L e 51'1a'5' I ,1 F-= �. - R 13e2.42' I C`j '� I • • 3 TK p' L m 512.65E 1 • • 5: F�Z I ?' _: F LEGAL DESCRIPTION LJ QJ ?.., NIA,PORIKM DM ME NORTHEAST Of MC NORTHEAST OVARTER OF SECTION I9.IOAN9RP 2J NORIK Y X.s B RANCE 3 EAST.•RIAYL11E ARNO H M KING CORN.WAYONGION MSC..AS!MORO t` 6g0NQ.~ BEM..AI MC NORTHEAST CC..Or SAO suBWNYON.0 RUNNING THENCE RCS/ALONG 1M[ 1 CI (C NORM LW WNW"A DSIANCL OF M.CCCL -V� G. !KN.SOON.Mr TO ME Ma PONY OF UCUNNING or MC TRACT HERLM OCSCRBID: C .IIPD• 'CO.DiMCNC!MST ALONG A lW JO fit I SWM OF AND PANNE('TO ANC NORM Mt V.0 s/80110 •1 A ,•�Q' .II OSTANC(a 2Je FCCT TO MC„CST UNr K Mr CAST 1002`MT K SAO SLIM.N 16.61E E IORTHWESTER.'BOON O!DB NORTHERN PIACIr C F R IYA 6 co.wwwl wcwr o`wAr MI �'0r'R;•'w=--1 . 'THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAD NORIM.SIERI r DAR.rO MC WILRXCPON CY SAO L.-PIN, IlFl, --1 MC WWII IS JO WET SCUM OF AND PARALICL TO MC NORM MC K S.SIM MS., 1 -I MINCE WV ALONG SAID PARALLEL LOVE A orsowCC OF 2`3.!(CI•NON OR LESS.TO THE TRUE POW, Cow 1 /' _••.nw EXCEPT MAT PORTION MR.,t IMG EASTERLY a ME K.aI Y LMC 0r THAT CERTAIN TRACT ,W. 1 / CONVEYED TO!MC Orr OF RENTOI U NUYBCR UNDER RECORD. 1.4300 OO PK.0 0wrytow. I I - - - CI.1_ ln.nsj • • • • PLANT'LEGEND I in I (9 GGFSIED PALETTE IIf)I I 1P iri 0 ?JrS ACER RLERUN SCARLET SENTPEL.f,LE0R5lA Z FIRE HYDRANT 1 ;' lll I =IL.1 i = = TRALANfIgS'tYERAL'. 7 I �'7 OEROJ5 COC,CPEA Iri 1< I • �I< I pawl,' �' I L • • L _ _ _ PPUS SYLVESTRISTNAA PLCATA T • .6''-Y— SQUTH 7TH STREET —I • � 5M4A35 119. II Tt.C>r0 PPE.SPRAEA OUHALDA.BARBERIS U _ ___ 1 ® m•� �______ __ HSNTOftP?1515.RTY)OE-WRON 5PP.. PERS Q N °°ram 1 , "�°"' -�� ARCOLA.VCOR1U1 DAVPN — — ° ���rar i -1 L GROLPO COVER Mktg IT ,� `�::. _ y.�ep� �G 1> HYPERKAAI CN.YGNdt 1£DERA tT11K PALNSAWRA ``' 'a4 11 •� �O,_ Ze,o" r ____ TERANALI4 yRCHTOSTAPHYL05 WAUR51 H' • BUILDING N 'i?'. J _ .Wilr ''t° gyp._,,i I W i 3 • ®T+■off ®_,.,: i ) •L;` j Fi.eveA G TREES . ® ® �:�_ i Q I OA CORW5 KOUSA.HAWS FLORIEUZA.ACER PALATIAL ACER I pang•mr"6 r- •1 � � -i�i o '•'•�,'_`_-'�. i:1••'.'-'•�•J ®o / II. NATURALQP9 PERENdALS �� C I I %/// F • I IUSTA TL115.DAPF006 5.tEICROGAU Alilk • =',`f��y�{I`'.` • vM •, I RIMING AREA ANALY515 J AUTOT(DTIVE-I--II %I "' I I / - .. ���.sa'; \A OT R Qt6f1E MANTRA;AREA 162•56 5F CD o / I I I I �Ir p, 1 gecano. T1�VEft5 I r'/.� :.:1, �c�"Ss'. Cr tr - _ ao7i� TOTAL.Ot£NTE II-ANTIC AREA 20.726 5P Z I. 7/./ ICI _:°.o=°:° o. 1 �-°j '� �— I °�r•� °C�o°f�.vr• rr '��� ,o.. PAVEfENf AREASZ{+h iP„�'� �r...:mn :::::4011„. � �°`;�� • iORIYE.PARKPG.HANJJERPG J8.%0 SFaz. J ° o `\ FIRE LAZE 13.200 5F ,�. g�pr�l7 I I BUILDIr>u N I 411 s is• M,o,;- CONCRETE WALKS zzw Sr n wnuoi°em x I 00:1114 ELM IN I nn�°Gr nwc mm a rt, °,r�:••.• ' \ ISI.NL PLANTERS(4.470 5e)/PARKPG AREA(35.960 5P) •ye orrn�m:yrt� I .`::; ° J I / \v • �` % TOTAL ONSUE PLANE AREA(20.726 5e)/TOTAL WE c \ , � \ (I2I.B3p SF) 17A) \PROPO5ED \ ✓ArY di VIP \ mbrt, rtm Re Buu are a \ 41 , a, °°° LEGEND • V • TO BE SEEDED TO LAWN \ • • POLE NCLNTE0 LIGHTING FIXTURE kV TNMAPED A5 5001 ° v° .• • i� LML TM 11E or TTE / ° 4 rem TABLE CS LQbTRUCTION �' \ de:°... c eZ \ 0 BICYLLE RACK (_ e),,,_ 'HOOD BEIYAI l)-1 :i Ir►j• ° ■�,IIIIIIIII\IIII / � � .o ,,il�- u CATCH BA51N lir0, o§i � .°o 0 _.00?'.•" ___ ECALWY BLOCK HALL Z I :z i'• - SCALE r•oa • FIRE HYDRANT Z �o/ Y4 �� \i . o;�l:� •' UTLIT1 POLE Z g • • 21 AUGUST 1997 o IETAL SCREEN Pef•Te 6'NT. L i • : - -.......-- -- 0 0 CITY OF RENTON . GA 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 s-0.10,0,47431air . , 1 OCT 229 t "..ttartaprill : 0 78 : E* f if: VI3 MeTtil , 1. Y150564 U.S. POSTAGE 'ot ..1 -- ., ,- ,- . " C4ira3ND Bvertlf%e‘is. lv,aer \limos ocalole...-cricit 42 d -ii" 3ireeN h, ttr% 9e0S1 NO SUCH yeaTEMPTED-NOT KNOWN_ INSUFFICJENI ADDRESSREFUSED NOT DEL AS ADDRESSED,UNABLE TO FORWARD VACANT UNCLAIMED ROUTE#56f1,e4NITIALS .. . CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator• - • • October 20, 1997 Mr. Roger Richert .. _Richert&Associates Architects _ 9311 SE 36th Street, Suite#110 Mercer Island, WA 98040, SUBJECT: Renton Coil Spring Company • Project No.LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF Dear Mr. Richert: . This letter.is to inform you that the,comment and appeal„periods have ended for the Environmental_ ', • Review Committee's(ERC)'Determination of Non-Significance:- Mitigated for the above-referenced _project.- 3' - :NO appeals were"fled.;=This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may :proceed: The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. As you are aware, a Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting : = in the Council Chambers on the second.floor of City Hall,Renton, Washington, on October 28, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the Conditional Use Permit. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is, required to be present at the'public hearing. A copy of the'staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as. part of: ' this public hearing. • If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 277-6186. • For the Environmental Review Committee, Jennifer Toth Henning • Project Manager . . . • cc: - Castagno Brothers.Inter Vivos Revocable Trust/Property.Owners : : ;. .. - . ,Mr.-Charles Pepka/Renton.Coil Spring Company%Applicant: e: Parties'of Record FINAL Dfl� .. . 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 .:';: This Darer contains 50�•recurI i1 malarial 9fl%nnst cnnsimnr c• " 4 © CITY OF RENTON ______ ..... Nil Planning/Building/Public Works , . y A T �'`'c' ='af' "f' "_, ' C r ,,,.' * 4 sv Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 0 - s,-,, I � V) t-- OCT 2 1 9 7 { ': °°_9 E O .Z 9 5 I' cc cc , ,_ ,:-... if Castagno Brothers Inter Vivos Revocable Trust 434 SW 7th Street Renton, WA 98057 SOCK -''.--- ''‘-tr ;,�sb44 �tiuiVi � Lbt, er ilia! SENnER �` . 5Z,1nr 8�''�'uj1 r21e''! ,l�4isil ifta�,1,�141„sl,l,i,i l ►1,L �Ut„11.i;,i}{,{ ................... . .:::..............................................:.....:..:.::::::::. MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION: 4-31-10.4B.4.y. Commercial Arterial Zone: Permitted Uses REFERENCE: This interpretation/policy decision is issued with reference to the Renton Coil Spring Company's application for Conditional Use Permit, File No. LUA-97-123-CU-H,ECF. SUBJECT: Whether the manufacture of titanium springs from previously manufactured titanium products(via cold-processing)is considered to be a"light manufacturing use". BACKGROUND Renton Coil Spring Company (RCS) manufactures titanium springs for high technology customers. The company has operated within the city limits in an existing residential area for 48 years. In order to produce the titanium springs, Renton Coil Spring purchases previously-manufactured titanium wire, bars, coiling and sheet metal products, and, by cold-processing, fashions these items into a wide variety of types and sizes of finished springs. All of the work is performed indoors, with some of the work accomplished by hand, and the balance by machine. Because a cold-process is used, no airborne or waterborne pollutants are emitted. Representatives from RCS have provided a noise study documenting`the existing noise levels at the current location, and the proposed location. The report concludes that existing background noise (traffic) would overshadow any noise emitted from RCS at its proposed location. RCS proposes to relocate to a site zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). Light manufacturing uses are permitted in the CA Zone with a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. The CA Zone lists uses permitted with the approval of Conditional Use Permit by the Hearing Examiner, including: "Light manufacturing, including assembly and warehousing of prefabricated parts and finished parts; also including minor finishing work as part of the assembly process." No definition for "light manufacturing" is included under the Zone Code's definitions section (Section 4-31-2); however, that section does set forth a definition of "Manufacturing Uses" and contrasting definitions for "Light Industrial Use" and "Heavy Industrial Use". Those definitions read: "MANUFACTURING USES: Types of land uses in which materials or substances are transformed into new products including construction and assembling of component parts, and the blending of materials such as lubricating oils, plastics, resins or liquors. "INDUSTRIAL USE, LIGHT: A type of land use including small scale or less intensive production, manufacturing, distribution or fabricating activities. May also include office and supporting convenience retail activities. "INDUSTRIAL USE-HEAVY: A type of land use including manufacturing processes using raw materials, extractive land uses or any industrial uses which typically are incompatible with other uses due to noise, odor, toxic chemicals or other activities posing a hazard to public health and safety." JUSTIFICATION: The proposed use by RCS is consistent with a"Manufacturing Use" under the definitions stated in Section 4-31-2 of the Renton Municipal Code. By analogy to the "Light Industrial Use" definition, RCS should be considered a Light Manufacturing use because it involves a "small scale or less intensive manufacturing activity", rather than "manufacturing processes using raw materials". RCS does not manufacture titanium springs from raw materials. Instead, finished springs are made from previously manufacture titanium products (wire, bars, coiling, and sheet metal products). Further, in contrast to operations considered Heavy Industrial uses, the RCS operation does not currently, nor would it be expected to, generate noise, odor, toxic chemicals, or other activities posing a hazard to public health and safety, that would make the proposed use incompatible with other nearby uses. DECISION: The Renton Coil Spring Company shall be considered to be a "light manufacturing use" based on its current and stated proposed manufacturing activities, and as such, would be permitted to locate in the Commercial Arterial Zone, upon granting of a Conditional Use Permit by the Renton Hearing Examiner. DIVISION HEAD APPROVAL: DATE: /r DIVISION HEAD APPROVAL: DATE: /0 p c2 APPEAL PROCESS: To appeal this determination, a written appeal—accompanied by the required $75.00 filing fee—must be filed with the City's Hearing Examiner (200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055) no more than 14 days from the date of this decision. Your submittal should explain the basis for the appeal. Section 4-8-11 of the Renton Municipal Code provides further information on the appeal process. STY:'. ENT :...,ING DIVI ION > I'' ?> >>i =<>I' ` ` ` >'€>'igi......:......::::>:............> <.»::» >>:<:>< ::::<:::::< >:; >:<>:: :<C RENT> t ►N G 5 0 :.lVICE:>BY`'MAILING On the 2Z"''� day of O c..c b r , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United • . States, a sealed envelope containing mac.?c,A -k-o "ttearlyok L kA.I'v\ eV documents. This information was sent to: • Name • Representing . Charles' V'epka. . ' Rev-toh Coil Spnnoi Co. . lzcr c he__v " Rtclf\et " .a.vud Assoc.. EwtrwulleLL) • • '.D koe.rple..1^ • Scott Swtv,11a Iautd. -tealtKeA (Signature of Sender) 71.1410.. • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING .• ) • I certify that I .know or have satisfactory evidence that c i cid 1'C, signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be•his/her/their free and voluntary act forUthe uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. • Dated: Cql a9. � /CIl7 �. / �,e,,.F�_ i� . ;;•: -a.,,, a a Notary ubli d or the Stgte ingt n ''i vk�,K A , /6 /''?f,s / . Notary (Punt) pRILYN KAMCO (EFF .r, A 1:4* : My appointment ex � EXP` RES 6/29/09 r 9 ti!QLI L 1.. . f' j tt s . p:` ' cv-vov‘ Cork S •rtv%.-.1 Ccorvvrainl Project'Numtier LVf't cr1' 1231 CV—H 1 EL . NOTARY.DOC • T U. ICIP . �BU.I D►IN.G <'»><> > »»>< .:CO.UN.+G�L.:w�HAMBER�> �G�:N:DFL.�:O..;.. ..R.E...N.:.:O.N::AA:..:N..::.::.:.::�.1�::...::..................................................... >:r .e� .�r�er::>cf'>s t�ca#ccr>i<:nurnbcr:€:ran lit�it%Q1;;::I.:steel:at...:�R.::..::...:...............................................................lY:::..:........:::.:::.::::.:::::::::::.::::::Y:::::.�::::::::.�::::.�::::.:::�.:�:::::::::::. I i t::the:.discretioittirthe::Heann the :I�e>.heard�:<:i#ems::v�nlf::b..�.:ca:led:iG:or:heat!n a..::..:...::...:......:..:......:.::..:::.......::................ .................:...�::::.:.:..:..:::.::::::::::::::::::. PROJECT NAME: Renton Coil Spring Company PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF • PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to convert a 2.8 acre site at 437 SW 7th Street • from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Renton Coil Spring manufactures small, lightweight titanium springs for use primarily in the aircraft industry. They are presently located in North Renton at 325 Burnett Avenue North, and are seeking a new location to operate their facility due to recent and planned growth. The business employee 53 people and growth over the next seven years envisions 100 employees. Three existing one-and two-story structures totaling approximately 31,000 square feet (Bldg. 1 = 10,900 s.f.; Bldg 2= 13,800 s:f.; Bldg. 3=6,000 s.f.)would remain on the site. A new 16,500 square foot one-story addition would be constructed as part of a later phase. The project also requires a conditional use permit for a light manufacturing use in the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. Location: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue South. PROJECT NAME: Liberty Park P-1 Rezone PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-113,R,ECF DESCRIPTION: Environmental review for rezone from Public Use (P-1) zoning to Commercial Arterial (CA)zoning. Location: 1103 Bronson Way North. PROJECT NAME: Cedar River Trail Park Rezone PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-114,R,ECF DESCRIPTION: Rezone Cedar River Park from its current Public Use (P-1) zoning to Industrial-Heavy(IH)zoning with a"P"suffix attached to designate public ownership. Location: North of North 6th Street. AGNDA.DOC City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: October 28, 1997 • Project Name: Renton Coil Spring Company Applicant/ Charles Pepka Address: Renton Coil Spring Company • P.O. Box 880 Renton, WA 98057-0880 Owner/ Castagno Brothers Address: Inter Vivos Revocable Trust 434 SW 7th Street Renton, WA 98057 File Number: LUA-097-123,CU-H, ECF Project Manager: Jennifer Toth Henning • Project Description: The applicant proposes to convert a 2.8 acre site at 437 SW 7th Street from trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Renton Coil Spring manufactun small, lightweight titanium springs for use primarily in the aircraft industry. They a presently located in North Renton at 325 Burnett Avenue North, and are seeking new location to operate their facility due to recent and planned growth. Tt business employee 53 people and growth over the next seven years envisions 1( employees. Three existing one- and two-story structures totaling approximate 31,000 square feet (Bldg. 1 = 10,900 s.f.; Bldg 2 = 13,800 s.f.; Bldg. 3 = 6,000 s.. would remain on the site. A new 16,500 square foot one-story addition would t constructed as part of a later phase. The project also requires a conditional u: permit for a light manufacturing use in the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. . Project Location: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue South ,,.. ,. • d una. � �!'� >t�.. 'T ly r."i ate"s �2j, g:,.:®_ u `i. + ..n\:: H ;/;, . -c dA� , A�J7�• �f��� :1 rii ®'..a � ff 1 i 19' ENE \,,✓n ��•'u�,rnn'K s:n.3 nI s1 1 • �,I n to i, 'a 4 t s. m t- : 1 p.ti�i u 101p. m m sal r.d' 1022; ® • ... r P p. `I ._F ,.,✓"tl" W-" o LI/si ''®. ® .'1"—®.'tt!.Qdi ,., ® ® ® —'u__ Ei L. ric_v r, , ti Our! h 1 Inn ' 7�1if i ® , Y R 31, .1. s,Pi ,, V �' ",7v3AI L=2 HI Q3 .n �f '"alb' F Mr\re'" l: 1 , c�' A.'af<+ S 6TH �� .� o�, EpiQ'Bu( �: .:.ryrY S �� o an 1. ,. 4ii g »� I �I� weuus n..s• $�, ��P f.i o If _ '" .�\i — M <� _.� •• faf's; � ^W,.{ yr 0 a. Ids '� _ -, �� �m 5' ' c\, m - s e.: F..a � I n IA P oti'S\y •a os.c u- I:I r, I� 341 l.. o x�. .®s �d7 t;s � � •"S5� , o.�.. �_ i .,k�i I pE I ,r�l-lei" ' u71 _ ;! iI �`.-.yam, / �Fll \ Govt, j�, flagft,7,17 0 ,Of lo ,1 ;! y a�r� :'. . n ,,•,,;(..;•....„„ - 1 h._:•_, .... 1:, 1„ ,..11 i ,,,•_i_J 1.1„415e, , _. . •;:i vft, 1 ;.:i,, .. ,1 4,1, s. '1•1:_j I ' : v,,;oR ! :i ! fs:I. 0....r .3'0'•e 6 • .i4 i 'i 1 -\\\4 Je'r II 'co IM I r.' Py . \��i 1 c 5 v CI. __ I I.. ¢ of w y • � ,.oK/_ { 1P0 14A i L_ A ;/� �' i I. I F n RT HEPN Jr s l .. ��....OUP`OG iypY PO GRAY , rJl"µ ��""��a rr\ r / ,. s "•`� CO P1GHt 5 MO•r...... .' I I2I II�- .��� f,;\ City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examim • PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H, EC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 2 of 1 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Castagno Brothers Inter Vivos Revocable Trust 434 SW 7th Street Renton, WA 98057 2. Zoning Designation: Commercial Arterial (CA) 3. Comprehensive Plan Employment Area- Commercial (EAC) :Land Use Designation 4. Existing Site Use: Trucking business 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: residential --single family homes East: commercial South: commercial West: commercial/service 6. Access: from South 7th Street, and from Talbot Road South 7. Site Area: 2.8 acres 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: 30,944 s.f. New Building Area: 16,500 s.f. Total Building Area: 47,444 s.f. C. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Comprehensive Plan N/A 4498 2/20/95 Zoning N/A 4404 6/7/93 Annexation N/A 738 3/26/25 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: Water: existing 18-inch water line in South 7th Street, existing 24- inch water line in Talbot Road. Sewer: existing Metro sanitary line in South 7th Street, existing 8- inch extension in Talbot Road Surface Water/Storm Water: existing storm facilities are located in South 7th Street HEXRPT.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department - Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examii PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H,El PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 3 of 2. Fire Protection: per City of Renton Fire Department 3. Transit: Metro/King County transit serves the area. The Renton Park and Ride lot is located within one-quarter mile of the site. Routes 108, 109, 145, 147, 148, 155, 167, 169, 240, 245, 247, 340, 912 4. Schools: Not Applicable 5. Recreation: Not Applicable 6. Other: Site is not within the Aquifer Protection Area Zone E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Section 4-31-10.4: Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. 2. Section 4-14: Parking and Loading Ordinance F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element-- Light Industry Policies 2. Land Use Element-- Employment Area- Commercial Policies 3. Land Use Element-- Employment Area- Industrial Policies G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to relocate an existing lic manufacturing business to a site located in the 400 block of South 7th Street. The Castag Brothers trucking operation currently occupies the site. Renton Coil Spring proposes to renovate existing buildings on the property and construct additional 16,500 square foot structure in the future. The future building would be one story, a approximately 22 feet in height. Three existing one- and two-story structures, up to 30 feet height, are located on the site. These structures represent nearly 31,000 square feet development. At the present time, Renton Coil Spring is located in North Renton at 325 Burn Avenue North. Recent growth and forecasts for future growth necessitate relocation of t company. Renton Coil Spring manufacture small light-weight titanium springs that are us primarily in the aircraft industry. Approximately 53 employees presently work at the compar and within the next seven years, the number of employees is anticipated to reach 100. The subject site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA), and designated Employment Area Commercial by the Comprehensive Plan. The City's Zoning Administrators have determin HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department - Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examin PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H, EC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER.28, 1997 Page 4 of • that the Renton Coil Spring Company is considered to be a "light manufacturing" use for th purposes of defining the use with regard to zoning categories. Light Manufacturing uses al permitted in the CA Zone with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the City's Hearir Examiner. The site is presently covered by buildings or compacted gravel surfaces. The proposal wou result in a less intensive use, and the applicant has provided a landscape plan that would add substantial amount of new landscaping. Approximately 21,000 square feet of landscaping wou be installed. An additional 16,000 square feet of lawn area would be added to the southwe portion of the site, until such future time (within 10 years)that a new structure would be built. The existing concrete structures would be renovated and painted. Existing windows wou remain, awnings would be added, and all but two of the existing dock-high truck doors would k replaced with infill walls and/or windows. New Building No. 4 would be tilt-up concre construction with a painted surface. The applicant is requesting an extended approval of the Conditional Use Permit with regard the future development of a new building. They anticipate that this structure would not be bu for seven to ten years, but have requested approval of the conditional use in advance fi predictability, prior to exercising their option to purchase the land. A separate letter is attach( to this report with the applicant's request. The proposal would include parking for 68 vehicles, and two truck loading areas. A pedestriE access would be provided from South 7th Street to the main building entrance. The site ply indicates two employee break areas with tables and benches, one at the east end of the site, ar the other in the southwest corner. Benches would also be provided flanking the entrance existing Buildings No. 1 and 2. Two dock-high truck doors would continue to be used on the north facade of the existing Buildir No. 1/2. A ground-level truck door on the east facade of existing Building No. 3 would al: continue to be utilized. The proposal features a fire lane around the southern perimeter of II site. Access to the site would be from two points, a main drive to South 7th Street, and a secor driveway to Talbot Road South. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 amended), on September 23, 1997 the Environmental Review Committee issued Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES The ERC issued the DNS-M with four mitigation measures which the applicant is required to comply with. The mitigation measures are as follows: 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division,prior to the commencement of, arm for the duration of the project. Compliance: The applicant will be required to submit a Temporary Erosion Control and Sedimentation Control Plan for review with the construction permit/building permit submittal. The applicant ha not yet submitted for additional permits beyond the land use permits. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee for the new structure. The fee shall be calculated based on rates in effect at the time the building permit for the new structure is processed. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of the building permit. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examir PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H,EC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 5 of Compliance: The Fire Mitigation Fee will need to be paid before the a building permit could be issued. 3. The applicant shall be required to limit construction hours to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:0C p.m., Monday through Friday, and Saturdays as arranged, but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. Compliance: The applicant will be required to comply with this mitigation measure during construction 4. The applicant shall be required to submit a Construction Mitigation Plan to the representative of the Development Services Division, which indicates the haul routes am hours, and includes a traffic control plan. Haul hours are limited to the hours of 8:30 a.n to 3:30 p.m. unless otherwise approved in advance by the Development Services Divisioi The Construction Mitigation Plan must be submitted for approval prior to any construction/building permit being issued for the project. Compliance: The applicant will need to submit a Construction Mitigation Plan for review and approval prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits for any phase of the project. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments a contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into tl appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of tl report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Section 4-31-36 lists 11 criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider, along with other relevant information, in making a decision on a Conditional Use application. These inclm the following: (5A) CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMP. PLAN, ZONING CODE& OTHER ORDINANCES: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives at standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other pla program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. (1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT The project site is designated Employment Area - Commercial (EAC) on the Cit) Comprehensive Land Use Map. Sites with the EAC designation are intended to provii for residential uses and generally auto-oriented commercial uses that require Ian amount of land or high visibility (Objective LU-AA). This site is clearly not eith commercial or residential, nor is it located directly on an arterial. The site is functiona separated from Grady Way (the nearest arterial) and may be inappropriate f commercial uses that require a location on a high traffic corridor. However, a commercial use that would focus on the adjacent residential area, or expansion of the type of commercial uses located on the arterial at this site may result greater adverse impacts on the adjacent multi-family area to the north. The propos4 use appears to comply with the objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, light of the administrative determination made that considers the specific proposed u: to be "light manufacturing". Objectives and policies generic to Employment Area designations address light industri uses rather than light manufacturing. Objective LU-Z states: Promote the developme HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department - Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examin PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H,EC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 6 of of light industries in suitable locations. Policy LU-164 states that light industrial use which are allowed should be less intensive in order to main compatibility with adjace, uses. And, Policy LU-165 states that light industrial uses should not create noxiot conditions such as noise, odors, or traffic which could detract from the office use allowed in this category. The Zoning Administrators have determined that the proposed use meets the intent the category "light manufacturing" for purposes of deciding whether the use could t considered in the Commercial Arterial Zone. Furthermore, it appears that the proposE use would generate less noise and traffic than the existing trucking use, and that no odl would be created. Policies of the Employment Area - Commercial designation that apply to the propos include: Policy LU-174. Parking areas should be landscaped (including street trees, buffer berms), especially along the roadways, to reduce the visual impacts. Policy LU-175. Landscape buffers, additional setbacks, reduced height, and other screening devices should be employed to reduce the impacts(e.g. visual, noise, odor, light) on adjacent, less intensive uses. Policy LU-181: Development should be designed to be compatible with adjacent, less intensive uses, e.g. lighting, fences, landscaping, setbacks should all be considered during site design. The proposal would provide landscaping around the parking area and along the streets, including berms and street trees consistent with LU-174. The proposed new structure would be located on the southwest corner of the site, farthest from the surrounding streets, and residential areas, consistent with LU-175. Renovation of existing buildings and installation of landscaping would be consistent with LU-181. (2) ZONING CODE The site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) and permits light manufacturing uses with Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. (3) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: (a) SETBACKS: The CA Zone requires a minimum setback of 10 feet from the front and/or street, but thi setback may be reduced to zero (0) feet through the site plan review process, provided that blank walls are not located within the reduced setback. This setback would apply ti new structures on the property. No rear and side yard setbacks are required. The proposal would not change the existing building setbacks as structures would be renovated for Renton Coil Spring. Existing Building No. 3 on the northwest corner of th site would is presently located within the required setback, and this situation would not change. Existing buildings No. 1 and No. 2 (which are share a common wall)would meet the minimum setback requirements. Future Building No. 4 would be setback a minimum of 25 feet from the property lines. No minimum setbacks apply to this structure. (b) HEIGHT Building height is limited to a maximum of 50 feet, but may exceed that height wi special approval from the Hearing Examiner or Zoning Administrator (depending on t) height and surrounding zoning). Existing structures are one and two-stories in height (maximum height of 30 feet). Ti proposed structure is currently depicted to be 22 feet in height. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department' - Preliminary Report to the Heating Examir PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H,E( PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 7 of (c) LOT COVERAGE Lot coverage is limited to 65% but may be increased to 75% if parking is provided with the building or within a parking garage. Existing lot coverage is 21%with the three existing structures. Proposed lot coverage full site build-out would be 35%. (d) LANDSCAPING A minimum landscaping strip of ten feet(10)is required for lots abutting public streets except where reduced through site plan review. In addition, a pedestrian connection must be provided from a public entrance to the street unless the reviewing official(in thi case the Hearing Examiner) determines that the requirement would unduly endanger th pedestrian. The applicant's landscape plan shows a minimum of 10-wide landscaping from the property line to the interior of the site, for those portions of the lot abutting public street; This landscaping totals 16,256 square feet. An additional lawn area is provided from th edge of the property to the public sidewalk. The applicant is also proposing landscaping in islands within the parking lot (4,470 square feet). A total of 17% of the site would be landscaped with the proposal. A pedestrian connection is depicted on the landscape plan. The connection would include an entry walk from the South 7th Street sidewalk through the parking lot on a raised walkway/parking island, and a hatched crosswalk through the vehicle circulation area. (E) ROOF-TOP EQUIPMENT All site surface mounted utility equipment shall be screened from public view. operating equipment on the roof of any building shall be enclosed so as to be shield from view, except for telecommunications equipment. Project drawings do not indicate surface mounted utility equipment or roof equipmei Should any be proposed it would need to be screened per the requirements of tl development standards of the CA Zone. (F) REFUSE AND RECYCLABLE COLLECTION &STORAGE Permitted outdoor storage must be screened from adjacent properties and public rights of-way. Products or bulk material covered by buildings with roofs but without sides sha be considered outside storage and subject to the screening provisions of the CA Zone. All recyclables collections and storage, garbage, refuse or dumpsters contained within specified areas shall be screened, except for access points by a fence or landscaping c some combination thereof. The applicant has stated that no outdoor storage would occur as part of the propos, Outdoor refuse and recycling container areas are not indicated on the submittals. St will recommend as a condition of approval that if these are to be located outside, tl garbage/recyclables area would need to be easily accessible, yet separated from tl less intensive residential uses to the north, and would need to be screened from view. (4) PARKING AND LOADING ORDINANCE: The proposal is governed by Section 4-14, Parking and Loading Ordinanc Manufacturing requires a minimum of 1 parking space for each 1,000 square feet gross floor area, and no more than a maximum of 1.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet gross floor area (but not to include warehousing space). Warehousing is required have one parking space for each 1,500 square feet of gross floor area. Office use requires to have a minimum of 3 parking spaces per 1,000 gross feet of gross floor are HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department' Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examin PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H,EC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 8 of and not more than 4.5 parking spaces per each 1,000 square feet of gross floor are Modifications are possible if approved by the Department Administrator. The proposal would provide a total 68 parking spaces which would include thrn accessible parking spaces (one standard and two van-accessible) per the State Washington standards. Proposed manufacturing uses in the existing structures wou require a minimum of 26 parking spaces and a maximum of 39 spaces. Proposed offii use in the existing structure would require an additional 14 minimum to 21 maximu spaces. For the existing structures, the applicant would be required to provide a total 40 minimum to 60 maximum parking spaces. If the future construction of Building No. is approved, an additional 17 parking spaces minimum and 25 parking spaces maximu would be required. The total number of parking spaces that would be required for phases of the project(existing and future)would be 57 minimum and 85 maximum. F development that would occur during the initial phase, the applicant would have eig more parking spaces than required by the Code. The applicant could seek modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance, eliminate the parking spaces, place those spaces in reserve until such time that the addition was constructed. In addition, a ground-level truck loading area is proposed on the east facade of existii Building No. 3, and a dock-high truck loading area would be provided west of the ma building entrance on the north side of existing Building No. 2. The ground-level tilt door would include a 45-foot clear maneuvering area in front of the door per the Parkii and Loading Ordinance. The dock-high doors would have a 100-foot clear maneuverii area per the Code. (58) COMMUNITY NEED: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In t determination of community need, the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factoi among all other relevant information: (1) The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed Renton Coil Spring Company would replace an existing heavy truckii facility. The proposed use would be less intensive than the existing use on the sii Existing buildings would be renovated to accommodate the proposal, landscaping wou be installed, and site amenities would be added for the use of the employees. There not another use of this type in the immediate vicinity. Surrounding uses inclul residential areas, commercial areas, and automotive sales and services. (2) That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. The use appears suited to the site, given the intent to reuse structures, and due to tl less intensive nature of the facility given current site use. The applicant has submitt landscaping plans which accomplish the buffering and screening intended for prole( with this land use and zoning designation. (5C) EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adver effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: (1) Lot Coverage: Lot coverage shall conform to the requirements of zone in which t proposed use is to be located. As mentioned previously, the lot coverage of the site is presently 21%. The renovatil of the existing structures would not result in any change to the lot coverage. Futu HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department - Preliminary Report to the Hearing Exami PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H,E PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 9 o1 construction of new Building No. 4 would increase the total lot coverage to 35%, which below the 65% limitation of the CA Zone. (2) Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. The proposal would meet minimum setbacks of 10 feet from the street/front except • existing Building No. 3, which is presently approximately 3 feet from the South 7th StrE property line. The proposal would not change this existing situation. No side or re yard setbacks are specified in the CA Zone. (3) Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, belltowers, public utility antennas similar structure may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variant Building heights should be related to surrounding used in order to allow optimal sunlit and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. The height of the existing structures is between 22 and 30 feet. The proposed struck is currently proposed to be 22 feet in height. The CA Zone permits heights of up to feet. (5D) COMPATIBILITY: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of neighborhood. (Ord 3599, 1-11-82) The proposal would utilize existing structures that have been located on the site for a number years. The site is located across South 7th Street from parcels currently uses for single farm and some multi-family development, but these areas are designated/zoned for future mu family residential use. The site-is also north of and adjacent to areas intended for commerci retail and service uses (CA Zone). Heights permitted in the multi-family residential zone (RM- are up to ten stories or 95 feet. Heights in the commercial zone (CA) are 50 feet. The propos height of 30 feet maximum is in keeping with permitted heights. Scale of the proposed structt would not impact the residential area due to its location on the southwest portion of the si closest to the commercial area and farthest from the residential area. • (5E) PARKING: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased as much as seventy-five percent(75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone, in which ! proposed use is located, if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. (Ord.39( 4-22-85) See Section (5A)(4) above for a discussion of compliance with the Parking and Loadi Ordinance. (5F) TRAFFIC: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use a surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in t surrounding area. The applicant would provide parking on the north portion of the site. Sixty-eight parking spec are proposed in double-loaded head-in parking. Aisle width would meet the standard of 24 fe The proposal includes a looped emergency/fire lane around the southwest portion of the site. Vehicles would enter and exit the site from South 7th Street and from Talbot Road Sou Pedestrians would access the front entrance of the main structure via a raised walk% HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department - Preliminary Report to the Heating Examiner • PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 10 of 12 connecting with the sidewalk on South 7th Street. The walkway would be incorporated into a raised parking island within the parking lot, and a painted crosswalk area would guide pedestrians across the vehicle circulation area. A second raised walkway would lead from the building to the sidewalk on Talbot Road South to the east. However, no painted crossing area is proposed across the emergency/service loop or behind the parking spaces on the east side of existing Building No. 1. Staff will recommend that the applicant be required to provide additional pedestrian areas delineated from the Talbot Road South sidewalk access to the raised sidewalk. (5G) NOISE, GLARE: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. The applicant has provided a brief noise assessment conducted in July, 1997 by an acoustical engineer. The study included an assessment of existing noise conditions at the existing site of Renton Coil Spring (325 Burnett Avenue North) and existing background noise at the future project location (423 and 437 South 7th Street). The exterior noise level at the existing Renton Coil Spring Company 10 feet from the open door when compressors were running, but no metal work was being done,was 65.dBA....The noise level at private residences across Burnett Street was measured to be 51 dBA. For the proposed site, the applicant intends to confine the manufacturing operations to the existing buildings Nos. 1 and 2. When Building No 3 (adjacent to South 7th) is utilized, it would be occupied by offices. Buildings No. 1 and 2 are located approximately 200 feet south of South 7th Street. The consultant reported that noise measurements were taken from the residential area located on the north side of South 7th Street on July 29, 1997 and that the average ambient noise level was 64 dBA. Higher ambient noise levels were noted to be caused by street traffic volumes on SW 7th Street, and background noise from 1-405. In addition, some existing semi- truck traffic was noted going in and out of the trucking facility during the measurement period. The consultant's report concludes that there is little chance that the relocation of Renton Coil Spring would have an adverse acoustical impact on the residential community on the north side of South 7th Street. Furthermore,the consultant states that the relocation of Renton Coil Spring could result in a slight decrease in ambient noise level at the residences to the north, since the trucking operation would no longer occupy the site. While Renton Coil Spring would have some truck trips associated with pick-up and delivery,this would be fewer than existing 150 to 1.80 truck trips generated per week by the existing trucking operation. Noise would also be expected to result during construction of the proposal, and for this reason, the ERC imposed a mitigation measure to limit days/hours of construction. Project lighting would not be expected to impact the surrounding area. The applicant would be required to submit a lighting plan subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of a building permit. (5H) LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by building or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The proposal would result in the replacement of compacted gravel areas with nearly 21,000 square feet of landscaping. The ornamental landscaping would consist of trees, shrubs, groundcover, naturalized perennials, and lawn areas. Landscaping would provide a buffer from the two adjacent streets, and would provide a separation between parking areas and the sidewalk on South 7th Street. Landscaping would also be installed in planting beds and islands around HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner • PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 11 of 12 the existing and proposed buildings. The area reserved for future building No. 4 would be planed in an additional 16,000 square feet of lawn, and would be maintained by the owner. Staff will recommend as a condition of approval that additional landscaping be installed on the north portion of the site adjacent to South 7th Street, along the drive aisles of the parking lot. In addition, staff will recommend that the applicant be required to install and maintain the lawn area proposed to occupy the site of future Building No. 4. (51) ACCESSORY USES: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. Not applicable. (5J) CONVERSION: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. The conversion of the structures would not be a conversion to a conditional use structure. The actual use rather than the structure is the subject of this conditional use permit hearing. (5K) PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities, and/or services. The site is adequately served by City of Renton utilities and emergency services. Localized stormwater problems experienced in the area would not be made worse with the proposal, since the site is compacted gravel and is considered to be impervious at this time. The proposal would substantially reduce the amount of impervious surface through the installation of approximately 21,000 square feet of new site landscaping and 16,000 square feet of interim lawn area. H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Renton Coil Spring Company, Project File No. LUA-97-123, CU-H, ECF subject to the following conditions: (1) Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination prior to the issuance of a building permit. (2) Outdoor Refuse and Recycling: The applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing the location of the refuse/recyclables area. This area must be easily accessible, yet separated from the less intensive residential uses to the north, and would need to be screened from view. (3) Pedestrian Access: The applicant shall revise the site plan to demonstrate an additional pedestrian access from the Talbot Road South sidewalk-- across the fire/lane/vehicle circulation area to the raised sidewalk near the building entrance. The pedestrian crossing could be indicated as a painted crosswalk or alternate paving material could be used to delineate this area. The revised site plan shall be submitted for review and must be approved by the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of any building/construction permits. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Departmer. -- Preliminary Report to the Hearing Exami, • PRENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123, CU-H,E PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1997 Page 12 of (4) Landscaping: The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to demonstrate additional ornamental plantings along the north property boundary adjacent to South 7th Street. The landscape plan shall be submitted for review and must be approved by the Development Services Division prior tF the issuance of any building/construction permits. (5) Installation and Maintenance of Lawn: The property owner shall be responsible for the installation and maintenance-- including underground irrigation -- of a lawn area on the southwest portion of the site until such time that construction/building permits are issued for future development. (6) Parking: The applicant shall either eliminate six parking spaces from the proposal or seek a parking modification in order to exceed the maximum number permitted by the Parking and Loading Ordinance. The parking spaces may be placed in a reserve and landscaped until such time that the ne building is constructed on the southwest portion of the site. (7) Future Environmental Review: The applicant shall be required to apply for new environment review for future Building No. 4 if the application for a building permit occurs more than three years fro' the date of the environmental determination- mitigated (9/23/97). HEXRPT.DOC • HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P S. A Professional Service Corporation David L.Halinen,P.E.. Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building (206)443-i 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Fax(206)646 Bellevue,Washington 98004 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING August 18, 1997 CITY Or P MT- M Mr. Fred Kaufman City of Renton Hearing Examiner AU9 1 9 19997 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RECEIVED RE: Renton Coil Spring Company's Application for a Conditional Use Permit for Phased Development of the 2.8-Acre CA-Zoned Site Located at S. 7th Street and Talbot Road South REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL TIME DURATION WITHIN WHICH TO IMPLEMENT THE PROPOSED PHASED DEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. Examiner: I am writing on behalf of my client, Renton Coil Spring Company("RCS"), in regard to its request for a conditional use permit. Pursuant to RMC 4-18-14E (copy attached), RCS hereby requests a ten-year period within which to secure a City of Renton building permit for the new building proposed on the site. That building is referred to as "Building 4" in the conditional use permit application package. This special request is made because RCS's forecasted business growth indicates the need for phased development of the site. (Phased development projects are a category of projects for which the last sentence of RMC 4-18-14E authorizes the Examiner to establish approval time frames that exceed that code section's ordinary time frames.) Specifically, RCS forecasts growth of its business over the next decade that corresponds to a need for Building 4 in about 7 years. The three existing buildings on the site, which RCS plans to immediately use following City approval, are anticipated to meet the company's building space needs up to that point in time. A ten-year conditional use permit period is requested for Building 4 because of the uncertainties of such long-term business forecasting (i.e., the building may prove to be needed a few years earlier or later). Thank you for your anticipated review of this request. Please let me know if you need additional information. Sincerely, HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. David L. Ha inen cc: Renton Coil Spring Company(via telecopier) Attn: Charles Pepka Roger Richert, AIA, Richert & Associates (via telecopier) D:\CF\2353\001\KAUFMAN.LT1 , • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF APPLICANT: Charles Pepca PROJECT NAME: Renton Coil Spring Company DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Charles Pepka, requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 square feet would remain on site. Building No. 1 is 10,933 square feet, Building No. 2 is 13,817 square feet, and Building No. 3 is 6,194 square feet in size. A new 16,500 square foot addition (Building No. 4) would be constructed on the southwest portion of the site as part of a later phase. Parking would be modified and approximately 20,000 square feet of new landscaping would be installed as part of the project. The project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SW corner of South 7th'Street and Smithers Avenue • Mitigation Measures: 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division, prior to the:commencement of, and for the duration of the project.' 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee for the new structure. The fee shall be calculated based on rates in effect at the time the building permit for the new structure is processed. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the,issuance of the building permit. 3. The applicant shall be required to limit construction hours to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and Saturdays as arranged, but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. • 4. The applicant shall be required to submit a Construction Mitigation Plan to the representative of the Development Services Division,which indicates the haul routes and hours, and includes a traffic control plan. Haul hours are limited to the hours of 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless otherwise approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The Construction • Mitigation Plan must be submitted for approval prior to any construction/building permit being issued for the project. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF APPLICANT: Charles Pepca PROJECT NAME: Renton Coil Spring Company DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Charles Pepka, requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 square feet would remain on site. Building No. 1 is 10,933 square feet, Building No. 2 is 13,817 square feet, and Building No. 3 is 6,194 square feet in size. A new 16,500 square foot addition (Building No. 4) would be constructed on the southwest portion of the site as part of a later phase. Parking would be modified and approximately 20,000 square feet of new landscaping would be installed as part of the project. The project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: fi. °= SW-comer of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue Advisory Notes to Applicant • The following notes are supplemental Information provided In conjunction with the environmental determination. Because thesenotes'are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. ' 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. Police Department 2. Police estimate 8.53 call for service annually,•based on the size of the proposed addition. 3. All exterior doors need heavy-duty dead-bolt locks to help prevent burglary. Any glass doors need an application of security film or shatter-resistant glass--to help prevent burglaries. Parking lot lighting and the exterior of the buildings need security lighting. 4. During construction, it is recommended that the building site be fenced in with portable security fencing. This would help to deter theft of building materials and tools. All materials and tools will need to be secured when not in use. Theft and burglary of construction sites is one of the most commonly reported crimes in Renton. Fire Prevention • 5. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 gallons per minute (gpm). Five fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-foot of the proposed structure and four fire hydrants are required within 300-feet oft he structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 6. The applicant is subject to the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee as stated in the Mitigation Measures. 7. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout both the new and existing structure. 8. The applicant is required to submit a hazardous material inventory statement and comply with all requirements for the storage and use of hazardous materials. • Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 2 Parks 9. Landscaping outside of the property line is to be maintained by the property owner. 10. Sidewalk connections to the Burnett Avenue Linear Park should be provided. 11. The use of ecology block with cyclone fencing is not the most aesthetically pleasing if it is visible from Grady Way. Other alternatives should be investigated. Building Department 12. Maintain occupancy separation for existing Building No.2. 13. Structural engineering is required for all upgrades. 14. All State-mandated accessibility requirements must be complied with. 15. The applicant shall provide a soils report from a qualified engineer for new Building No. 4, prior to the building permit submittal. Utilities —Water 16'There is an existing 18-inch diameter water line in S 7th Street and a 24-inch diameter water line in Talbot Road. Fire flow is modeled in excess of 8000 gpm with a static pressure of 70 psi. 17. The System Development Charge has never been paid for this site. If additional meters are installed on this site the fee will be assessed with a'redevelopment credit. This fee shall be determined with the final plans. Utilities—Sanitary Sewer . 18. There is an existing large diameter Metro sanitary;sewer,line in South 7th Street with an 8-inch diameter extension in Talbot Road. 19. The System Development Charge has never"been paid for this site. If additional meters are installed on this site the fee will be assessed with a redevelopment credit. This fee shall be determined with the final plans. 20. An eight foot (8)wide utility easement along the eastern property line is required prior to any permit being issued for maintenance of the existing sewer line. ,.. Utilities—Stormwater 21.A limited level one drainage study was submitted with the application. Exemptions and thresholds of the final design shall be in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. 22. There is no net increase in impervious surface for this site, so the Surface Water SDC is not triggered. Full street improvements including, but not limited_to, paving, sidewalks, curb &gutter, street signs and street lights are required if not already existing. Upgrades or repair to city standards may be required. Plan Review—Transportation 23. A traffic study prepared by David Hamlen and Associates (August 5, 1997)shows no net increase in average daily trips for this proposal. Current use as a trucking facility generates the same or more daily trips than the proposed use. Therefore, no traffic mitigation fee is warranted. Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 3 Plan Review—General 24. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 25. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings;two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. 26. Temporary Erosion Control, most particularly mud and dust control, shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of th,e representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 27. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 28. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. Development Services—Current Planning 29. The project site is zoned CA=- Commercial Arterial.. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: September 12, 1997 To: Jennifer Toth Henning From: Kayren K. Kittrick, Plan Review),? Subject: Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123, CU-H, ECF EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER - There is an existing 18-inch diameter water line in S 7th Street and a 24-inch diameter water line in Talbot Road. Fire flow is modeled in excess of 8000 gpm with a static pressure of 70 psi. SEWER There is an existing large diameter Metro sanitary sewer line in SW 7th Street with an 8-inch diameter extension in Talbot Road. STORM A limited level one drainage study was submitted with the application. Exemptions and thresholds of the final design shall be in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. STREETS Full street improvements including, but not limited to, paving, sidewalks, curb & gutter, street signs and street lights are required if not already existing. Upgrades or repair to city standards may be required. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The System Development Charge has never been paid for this site. If additional meters are installed on this site the fee will be assessed with a redevelopment credit. This fee shall be determined with the final plans . SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge has never been paid for this site. If additional meters are installed on this site the fee will be assessed with a redevelopment credit. This fee shall be determined with the final plans . SURFACE WATER 1. There is no net increase in impervious surface for this site, so the Surface Water SDC is not triggered. COILGF.DOC • TRANSPORTATION 1. A traffic study prepared by David Hamlen and Associates (August 5, 1997) shows no net increase in average daily trips for this proposal. Current use as a trucking facility generates the same or more daily trips than the proposed use. Therefore, no traffic mitigation fee is warranted. PLAN REVIEW-GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control, most particularly mud and dust control, shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. 4. An eight foot (8') wide utility easement along the eastern property line is required prior to any permit being issued for maintenance of the existing sewer line. CC: Neil Watts COILGF.DOC I City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Sueks COMMENTS DUE: 9/10/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-123,CU-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/997 APPLICANT: Charles F. Pepka PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Renton Coil Spring Company WORK ORDER NO: 78268 LOCATION: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue SITE AREA: 2.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 30,944 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 s.f.would remain on site. A new 16,5000 s.f. addition would be constructed as part of a later phase. Project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing _ Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistortlCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS , . —"--22--"?'"? 4--) .-"- - .5/ -1-e-6(.) 1(__ of)'66 � did 7 ,,, _70 ,,,, .., ,,,_, / ce_ / wi l/1,Y1 ✓ Gt IN • G _ C. CODE-RE TED COMMENTS d �� �. /.� ,6 /i //vo ,71-D /g-e „k2„.___ , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional Information Is nee d to properly assess this roposal. Or‘(',e-e_( .1_ 74d6ignature of Director or A o epr sen ativeClc,/ Date �� DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Cilhb- 0 ,cam COMMENTS DUE: 9/10/97 01 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-123,CU-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/997 4110 ^'l't` �V APPLICANT: Charles F. Pepka PROJECT MANAGER: JennitK.TAth Henn ?' n PROJECT TITLE: Renton Coil Spring Company WORK ORDER NO: 78268 �0„ �/v 9� LOCATION: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue /s/()N SITE AREA: 2.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 30,944 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 s.f.would remain on site. A new 16,5000 s.f. addition would be constructed as part of a later phase. Project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More, Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor. Major information impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources ,Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATEQCOMMENTS /144r- 614A47 / (d< '-g' )/ /6—" . aCt -- 5;,...eydylefidtA.r. 7,-f ---,e-e26 "-) J-I-diV)'S f We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where addie al information is needed to prope y assess this proposal. `2q p / \ r7 7r 'nature o Direct r A orized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 ��Y CITY OF RENTON o o A FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM �NT� DATE: September 2, 1997 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Code-Related Comments for Renton Coil Spring 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 gpm. Five fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and four fire hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of new building area only: 16,500 square feet x $0.52 = $8,580.00 This fee is payable at the time of building permit issuance. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout both the new and existing structure. 4. Access is acceptable as proposed. 5. Applicant shall complete a hazardous material inventory statement and comply with all requirements for the storage and use of hazardous material. CT:ss Precom City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEE ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: vt,l«t COMMENTS DUE: 9/10/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-123,CU-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/997 APPLICANT: Charles F. Pepka PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Renton Coil Spring Company WORK ORDER NO: 78268 LOCATION: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue SITE AREA: 2.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 30,944 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre sits from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 s.f.would remain site. A new 16,5000 s.f. addition would be constructed as part of a later phase. Project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Informatlo Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare _Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services ✓ Energy/ Histodc/Cuitural Natural Resources _ Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet , 53 pollcc CGc I lS e3-tiim&A ann ua !I y, Paid on kstkt q Q.o(e(i t • 01 for dal(s '�d wL/hi -da ii d ac1-6v t- octcs hi •• torec;ral. P glriy . ,q iv qass tgdoxs at of cut, vp1t ca:Eim ova crcv?Ity A/r20 y sha.tw re5iian ; at k le ( a kinc iclit • T L fo4lci4q lilts % - tO U M ,.trit / -e4yrt*ig., . DI,v�I 0,c n ah2Lctlon , At corn') tail , Sr tQ bc mad. Yet uu;Wit, 1- '-fabu. sect/ iry ,fei/a t` iA , 1 1ul p aii ytt6i- kit; ,ctilv, moiActl s f- yovl z . At mataa l s %.- kiMi • ecumd. w ridgy in a Se, . Thee- COOL �I �1 n�.ecl � b� S �, 1,v) a/7 y •A Cbna YW2 Ln S/too 'IS one. 06 Vh c most corn:n c U I' � r t - in Lgen tovv • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or i where additional Information ddditionalInformation Is needed to properly assess this proposal. � 74®�a.ure of Director Aut riz Representativecnil Date J DEVAPP.DOC I Rev. • in SITE AREA pESGRIPTtON5 W I w,. .on Cr m �:x2 , Z AY:.02.5¢747141 • FIRE HYDRANTI-- Id1 1 • I ,m...w.mo..e+uo diS In Ul .... VI-1 • k^-- -.1 SOUTH 77N STREET mom: O!g, Malmo in o 1 u.� I ,a �.®s k� Q2 vancnx s. w I .a_I �nx ns r� _ i T `- v i.Di�L.ab • _ — am.wK. 7ni-.ln.'.® <1 dI y J r ]�00' ¢S !: i ' /�' ^_. • • • I �i �.. L 1 7J iI r� �"""— I_ i— i �• ( ) ( P• ) C Z N c"7 glr r !..-11 \\ nuTononve I. - I I / w �.,�.......m<.� �r� ,,,> s1•••. �EGEm� rOVER5 I *� _ir / ! j y( I I IHI I I I t I I lot i r, A r� ILI r. ,,.�. I IB�DGN� I D .B BUILDING N I 0 ® \, \ . ,a"."'.. .µ, iNG 1ST Or.,rpe PROPOSE\ Z BUILDING N k -'•,\N' a_ • In 411k _,_ • „,,..„ ®O o SCALE I"•30• Z 9 P • O. f— * • / 21 AUGUST 1997 10 EXIT • EXISTING RUIl DING #1 g EXIT (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) - - ' 6.194 s.f. J3 EXIT MAIN - • ENTRY ` 10o• u9• r 10', it FIRST FLOOR PLAN °1 IT . NEW PROPOSED BUILDING H4 — EXIT• (LIGHT MANUFACTURING: LWIRE SPRING COILING&I GHT FINISHING)AUTOMATIC _ 16.500 s.f. MIEO WILLS FCR CODE ' 7 EXIT r�N + I . EXIT I // \ I EXIT ■ N. . XISTING :UI SIN N I / I I I oou.0 s nc PATsrm. (EXISTIN OFFICES) EXISTING BUII DING 61 I / I I I I 4.60016 s.f. °°e+:III/ m (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) / E%ISTING BUILDIN B2 m >4l, 10.933 s.f. — // H" L I II (E%15T1 21 OADIf I BAYS) iu// " I no.o�ar °0°1m 1LC.. IA WM ., CI / I I Icl g IIII / I I \ I I I 11I Na NM RULs WHO.m. NEW ENTRY .0.FLOOR A. ie OECOND FLOOR PLAN • / FIRST FLOOR PLAN 100• 149• AB/I . 9779039 RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY RICHERT & ASSOCIATES DI.Or NA GENERALIZED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS LOR 0-1-91 434 S.W.7TH ST.RENTON.TEL 98057 ARCHITECTS PLANNERS SHEET ISSUE RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY . 325 BURNETT AVE.N.,RENTON,WA.98057 9311 Southeast 36th ST. #110 phone:(206)232-1700 Al FLOOR PLANS Mercer Island. Wa. 98040-3799 foe: (206)232-1706 ...--PROPOSED ..—JEDOTO slyer BEYOND/—FA. AW WIND _ H \ EX6TIMG CNgPlES — AS REQUIRED NEO \ / • EAST ELEVATION �•MEPw MN W2029 SYSTEM SYSTEM • / /—CONaEE 1. rCV 1-1 NI i • WEST ELEVATION �" PAWED \ roD,RD DOOR BE REPLACED R.TANCOR DESIGN INTENT m,,:u -NEW ENTRY A SIGNATURE STRUCTURE THAT WILL CELEBRATE THE RENTON COIL SPRING COUPON!AND SIGNAL WamoAS THE BUNCHES MNN ENTRY.THE STRUCTURE MONO LL BE INTEGRATED WITH THE NEW ENTRY STEPS PROPOSED ND AWNWS OXER WneOWS 0 ADA.ACCESS RAMP.IT WILL BE A WIN FEATURETIGTG M PEDESTRIAN NEW ONSTRCT COURT. THE STRUCTURE WILL JIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111111 U 11 11111111111111 1 I 111111111 111 11111111111 11111111111 111 I I I I 11111111,111 C EXPOSED TUBULAR STEEL WITH MEW.ROOMS. L J GROAT ( \1 I \ �1D RERUN.9 T9 _ncsn. DOORS +I I — I rD DOD9 i BERD��ED �ADDEM PARTIED BAPO I - E AT Of NORTH ELEVATION V RB'"L REFIACEDPLEWILL WALLS AS. E .PE BN� D EALIWGODR"NTNWB // PROrom G AWNINGS LAYER WHOM 1. _ _Til a g . \ �AT DITBASE PONIED NAND - - - - - BUILDING #1 & 2 REPOT RILLBEY L.PEB9C SOUTH ELEVATION "'�`OPRENO N ExtEmo� ELEVATDOO bS N AND/DR WuaDWs . SCALE: /11._1•_0• ro• AD RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY1 mB A R" 99-90J9 GENERALIZED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS RICHERT & ASSOCIATES ' I Ba 47 NOTE 434.S.W.7TH ST.RENTON,WA.90057 SHEET ISSUE REFUSE/RECYCLING MEAS AND ROOFTOP EOUIPUENT TO BE SCREENED FOR ARCHITECTS PLANNERS RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY ^ ^ . 325 BURNER AVE.N.,RENTON,WA.98057 • //�\L 9311 Southeast 36th ST. #110 phone:(206)232-1700 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Mercer Island.'Wa. 98040-3799 fa.:(206)232-1706 • • • • . . Port I.—CONCRETE .MS N —ACCENT PAWED R NO a MSC Of LoAtec SOUTH ELEVATION • \\_Aadr vAN1EB eMm 1 WEST ELEVATION BUILDING #4 EXTEROOR ELEVATOOM SCALE: 1/e_1•-e PS..r".1.f•� I • • oicnxc MOORS T7' PROPOSER NOR MONO I I I I I I I II II _ _ �waart WALL ii O.COOR • EAST ELEVATION ISM COORS WV=•"`ES SE INITrxYnuvx4 SOUTH ELEVATION 0.111...19 NO/OR MOORS I I I I 14 1 I I I I I /— - • • WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING #3 ENTEROOR ELEVATOOHn @ SCALE: 1/e.I.-O- •oe RA 4T_ a IP RP P RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANYORR.�' DOT GENERALIZED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS RICHERT & ASSOCIATES ,a, B-I-RF • 434 S.W.7TH ST.RENTON.WA.98057 REFUSE/RECYCLINGAsps ARO ROOFTOP MOMENT TO BE SCREENED SHEET ISM FOR ARCHITECTS PLANNERS RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY A . 325 BURNETT AVE.N.,RENTON,WA.96057 9311 Southeast 36th ST. #110 phone:(206)232-1700 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Mercer Island. Wa. 98040-3799 fax:(206)232-1706 • arnsays PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 14 OF/ ,D L✓sceeP,a..DAw<Y SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. CITY OF RENTON, STATE OF WASHINGTON I IL) I I FIRE HYDRANT 'FOUND ca+c LION W/ .. Ex CB Q I UN b TACK IN CASE Ru EL,7..60' I NEW WATER Q NEW WATER ONNECTION JO' N JO' 005'SWTH OF LINE ��M�µy b� INV EL^2.110'-21•CUP ERN, In PAIN CONNECTION (/y)) /� CONNECT AND EXTEND STORM xluLc-2BH W l GRAPHIC SCALE ITT e1 HARDI£AVE S W 5 71.SI ORAIN TO PROPOSED SITE. wV E-21.J1'6"C NC COP SEC 19-23-5 U1� 1 /I COIL 19-2l-5 I X e� tiI FCUxO CWC Yp1% rI n lOUxp I%•Pw W CLM'C Jp' IWu FL x 2J51 : BRASS ndt IN LEAD ' .44�0, M USf(l/9l) TOR 19 w-S NC _I '� wV CL'2B66'-6"W A19 6l' PER DEED ^ i w CASE(J/9l) nl w MET 1 !� Cp1 19-IJ-S /T/l60 JOOB00 y m "--- ,�••_..�.44 • W4 SOU TN 7th STREET 8••• ,„,• 1' r, I ,,.6 b Ls, uf7R0106 SENER LINE _. 14 _ SURVEY NOTE: " N-89Y2' TIRO 10B�ER LINE_ x m g \ J,I�� \�6ir 1 BAL OF BEARINLL 2661 B6'(YEAS) I _ T70.31. INS IRUMEN).' N TOTAL STATION DIFI-A IOLG (n - 1 -—-—-—�- 44292•. Ted—-—- (5 SECOND INSTRUMENT). owF 6.r s _•'S:�= 5J METHOD USED FIELD TRAVERSE KITH ACTUAL Cl.: 8 i, L—Sr—L�\ 0��rI�L G - C G C a C -- 21"w FIELC 1J2A1JOE0>OTS AND ANGLES W _ �- �6 ` ^ w'H• •r'Crt • / BASIS 00F BEARING:NORTH 9L/Nf Of ME NE •"+ io � V.: 4.•: __ -�,c.. 1�-..' ,..+a. 4.rlr-/ P r.. III ? i ` Yew /////l//e.,,r ' ��a ` 63.BO.fy ———'—•— 1t1e,x ro, N ..Ih ' i LINE 5(N tl9 NE 1/J -3 " EX CB I I �:1: i �•- ' v " `•• N. $"/M1 P.0 BENCHMARK:CITY OF RENTON MON/1920• J-BRA55 DISK W 1. 2 0 ' RN EL E 27.96' h-�'la' _ I ' _ STAMPED K G COUNTY SURVEY RAINIEET EN-61 OCAT j w (L-Rli6P1'-6"w k / ' p= JO 8.0C" 13 OEWALK ON E EAST SIDE OF RAINIER ALES GATED m" pt/WA2 Y, i I / EIS'. ,�ur ••.{y EX CB NORTH SIDE OF SOUTHER✓DR.,AI'604 RAINER Ave S ,C / 2 H = 3U 00• L' L B15 '^"� ELEVA RON 2).B>'(B 19M) V ( CB -� / ^NEW CB - • —me - >.:3• �'lr .D, WY EL^2660'-6•NENSW j " Rao EL w 27JJ I r- — I W/OIL WATER " ....... ...` • ^•M 11 S .. (� i Z 1 wV EL-26.JJ'-re..SZ* Tn ' SEPARATOR '�•••• __ NEW CB 20D' n - j2 NOR J ," �• P COt IWrG Pk / nn H ` ��•�:� GS p 1n'I' Ex SEL"H 29BJ I"i UPON IN ANY FORUAOV FRONDED BERGROUND UTILITIES Y°THEWWN S IOWA ENGNEERS ARE BASED Ety F� .- q VWBx' r '. g El?p I ^ NV 21.JJ'-B•xh5 .. DOES NOT ACCEPT RESPCWL&UTY OR ASSuu,LIABILITY FOR " / C 1 I�/— '�. 7 as I THEM ACCURACY OF COUPLEIEE55 EI1541.9 �1(I{EL1�1I 'u4ww nr -JID6'!J• 11�1 Roo CB i I ill rF li L9.14 " •, 1 A^I00 W' UUU / y" a 4,= 18.55.21 a`. w EL:22pea2"-6 C ///i/ :�< I Jcm i �� "- � ersw \�L LEGEND (EXIST.) "o /////- I ,• m EX ssuH >yj DEcmlous TREE 3 / y�(/ oho El' 1 Z NEW FH i 1 irk. O O CX CATCH BALK)roC Ie. ^ Ll (4 I f�� �41. � I o 6 " y nu r ll ® Ci CATCH BASw)rPC 2 COv?CR TREE s Q0/ 4 rn 1 'r< 'O • $ warn,DvALur RAM HEM- a eSC j' rIKE Nu I Y • 0 �./.��it'dllt,•� O \ `l�, FIRE HroRAN) WV,POLE I c+ / / ���v as n .Ei� �` v warER MCI. POLE - vl --a.. N[ NL}L•-CB ����N _� 2 • <.;•°.:5^,: 1 WATER BIOw OFr, o u¢BO.✓ I ////l .. C t •me ...r•n. x cx � �+ 4 )Z•BK'R. 111\\\,q,-_ CL TELEPHONE CABIA lC CCCO ROCKERY CE V� X ..//// a .+�1y" • '1 W_��+ —...E.1 ` m CABLE f AtlNAI£ A, Aioni ix cast GAS VALVE W SUR(ACC BRASS YLwUNENI �l� I2 W /yii '=� ,•°/•A%�I •�� �B •'`' '""�� 0 TELEPHONE OANHpC 8150 RPBPE G CAP i r •I %� I D FLOOR/�`"I BU�LDlNG N I Jz6D �,:. uDiala«ctT IROw APE 7 n�• i CLWNLYT ALL 06 4 AND I nawc'/l9RAw r%%r%/ yA,,,."a / .v....i ss YH 'r\,••¢ear \\a 0 Mdvnaewc.nt CJ`' 1 b1'n Til a)asitr ro ERA KOOA I PCESIRMx PULL BUTTON POLE N�K O n N SYSR. / j/ NI SI EL 2198'-B"NAS \ c 4 LGv r 3140 R POST SIGN (n L.�-.e ����,' 6pOM1s" B \ nC uxCRpv BOA J -'Yr / " C+(. // ilk EXISBNC ECOLOGY C ( BLOCK watt. `CJ h N.\\‘‘,...‘\\.,\T‘i,.,, / / LEGEND (NEW UTILITIES) `I_1 SeJ.T NEw SEORM1I DRAINo Ew PROPOSED / -'� - ■ NEW CATCH BASINLo BUII-DINc_N.4 / W FH\Lo.MaXuiva0 i >;// NfW CB -�'--A- NEW WATER MAIN �i U .' \ O \ r •I NEW SIDEWALK I J Iqy` / L = 21 .65' r NEW FH fF \\ 5 ;, /.- R = 13B2.42• i 09•am _" L = 5382.4 ¢�G" `CC '� J\s.. .r f.46�t� n,G �\ a, gu .I I- _\•' 221BB44' LEGAL DESCRIPTION HAI PORT.OF ME NORTHEAST OF THE NORTHEAST("VARIER p'SECTION 19.IONNSHIP 2.1 NORTH. L" J2 R. I RANCE 5 EAST.WILLAVETTE YERIdAN w KING CONN,.wASHwGION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOW. '01' { '{''CWGC... BEGINNING AT ME NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIMLCN AND RUNNING THENCE REST ALONG THE � NORTH UNE THEREOF A DISTANCE Of 77523 FEET: 2 "Doi B'f THENCE SOUTH JO FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OE BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED: 3 JI..90' f�Gp'L1GL THENCE NEST ALONG A LINE JO FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH uNE CV SAID SUBDIYLON A I,":� Vil INSTANCE OF 2J6 FUT TO ME NEST UNE OF ME CAST 1013 2J FEET Or SAID SUBDINLOV, x -w.-e N 2 HENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID NEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 4J565 FEET AKRE OR LESS.!O THE ffsw0 r6'B - NORMRfSIERIY Man&LY THE NORTHERN PACING RAILwa✓COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY• 2 I0.. N,- THENCE.IS ALONG SIN NORMY•LEL 70 THE NO 10 THE INTERSECTION A N. LINE ATM A [INC SHKH IS JO FECI SOUTH d-AND PARALLEL O M£NORTH LINE SMO SLEON.TO . [NEC wtST ALONG SAID PARALLEL UNC A pSTANGY Cr 2151([CT,CORE OR LESS.!O MC TRUE PONT h Y 71. .^u I.a.K Or BEGCNINO ... / EXCEPT MAT CO CERN TO TH£TOIYION TCE RENTON UNDERREOF LTING TRFCORONG SOURERERLY Or THE EJL60a)008T LINE�THAT CERTAIN TRACT o.¢u.ree DIG r.0..}...1.0.. I CIO, i s,._, • • • ' PLANT LEGeNo I Ul I • (SUGGFSTE0 PALETTE cc Ili FIRE HYDRANT I 111 �KI>u_i I I =lL1 I 7RIACANTID5E5 AGERQpERIALRUSW.M SCARLET SENTIPEL.GLEDRSN Z FJI I II I _ QJERCIS r!Y!¢.BA (n CONFER TREES A ('-i L • J I• L ., ,�F PINJS CONTORTA.PPUS SYLVESTRIS.THAA PLIGATA- 'WHT I . SOUTH 7TH STREET —I • srRLBs 08 ® ,1pe. TLICJU PRE.SPIRAEA BLR(ALDA.BARBERIS (� a _ _—___ _ - -— TENTOREN515 R SM... PERISin 1 °"OQ I I JAPONICA.VEURN 11 DAVDI ppi�Ipp or yiH::........•..... Oilt rgk .+.n+r..°'d _ _. IT---- 6Rp)W COVER RON IT 0°ua /,�. ` .' yagp� �. / L NTPERICLc GALYGWJII.PEDERA FELIX PALH)SAN7RA N. 1 -.4'' (Q_;T°��"q' II:di. � 'O o `28 TERMINALISt ARGNTOSTAPHYL05 UVAUR51 yg{� • BUILDING N. o J .®�. J••u i;6.. �: i►� /`�°"a ryr., . O I w $ 3 a EEO Wow" ®Ll::;i 0 1 FLOWERING TREES owns aic • ® ®r1 k rowc 0-' O O1 CORNJS KOWA.NALUS FLORIBUNDA.AMR PALMTOP(AGER T11° �'��0[,y�- T.:E•, �ti. Pw:.r... -.,-Joo N I �� GIRLINANt GERGIS LANADEN515 I :. yy NATURALIZED PERENMLS uw°w, • —/ I � I %v 1,1.4 0: �7z.. ®14...' 1 FDSTA.TULIP5.['WOOLS. IS p°'O16 A%c55 FODILS.HETEROGALL �.... a,•I' o° emtt — rir:,: / Al• !lei _ = I I e �' J' \ • PLANTING AREA ANALY51� J AUTOTTOTNE �' • y•r'I`\`c e �� waxe,^TIM� J PARKPG ISLAND PLANTER AREA 4.470 5F 's� o I�Wi=uNrf�76aMMuuuAinglFonrlk - aym1p�aa�O�,r. : OTHER ONSITE PLANTING AREA 16,256 5F (5 MOVERS I IW�F_1�n'Oi�;_�r;. _, ���� _ o� • TOTAL ON51TE PLANTING AREA 20.726 Sr Z - �.• ../o'o'•:� PAVEIfNf AREAS Z •�•ti _ /to ®• DRIVE.PARKNG.IIANJVERWG 38.%0 Sr `� , ° .,•\, .:'• FIRE LAID 132.00 5F .J a.M aLDr,Hz I // WILDING ry I 'e'' _, •i •:• CONCRETE NALKS zz5o sF I � I F1 / I mm�c°am° x MIT ••� \ SCAN)PLANTERS(4.470 Sr)/PARKNG AREA(38.%O SF) L _ rtr k mm I �:yr r o` mom w• 1159i I , I gg f'J v • V" I; TOTAL ONi1TE PLANT AREA(20.72G 5F)/TOTAL SITE ��/ N o \ (121.830 SF) 17.0L �' \PROPOSED ieTS'��. o;� ' \ BUILDING N 4o ► of:' • 1�/ \ FM�Sari mnmP ;°% FUTURE BOLDING SITE n in \ o o"i POLE MOUNTED LIGMPG FIXTURE U TO BE SEEDED TO LAWN AND MAPTTAINED A5 SUCH �.'' O UNTIL TILE THE 6F TIE ill 1 \ .../„,..".../ r0 0 TABLE Z oo;: 0 BICYCLE RACK E \ "A". • 'N000 BENCH U7 ( v `-� °� �II�,. • LATCH BASIN IA OY. oil rm A. oo -- ECOLOGY BLOCK HALL 0000 SCALE I"•30' • FIRE HYDRANT Z �� 1D1 1V;,v=.- oy rC Fy` - a UTLITY POLE Zip w�S 21 AUGUST 1097 — rem_SCREEN FENCE 6'NT. OC,.� HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. A Professional Service Corporation David L.Halinen,P.E. Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building (206)443-4684 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Fax(206)646-3467 Bellevue,Washington 98004 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING August 18, 1997 CITY nP.P MT-M Mr. Fred Kaufman City of Renton Hearing Examiner AUG 1 9 1997 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RECEIVED RE: Renton Coil Spring Company's Application for a Conditional Use Permit for Phased Development of the 2.8-Acre CA-Zoned Site Located at S. 7th Street and Talbot Road South REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL TIME DURATION WITHIN WHICH TO IMPLEMENT THE PROPOSED PHASED DEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. Examiner: I am writing on behalf of my client, Renton Coil Spring Company("RCS"), in regard to its request for a conditional use permit. Pursuant to RMC 4-18-14E (copy attached), RCS hereby requests a ten-year period within which to secure a City of Renton building permit for the new building proposed on the site. That building is referred to as "Building 4" in the conditional use permit application package. This special request is made because RCS's forecasted business growth indicates the need for phased development of the site. (Phased development projects are a category of projects for which the last sentence of RMC 4-18-14E authorizes the Examiner to establish approval time frames that exceed that code section's ordinary time frames.) Specifically, RCS forecasts growth of its business over the next decade that corresponds to a need for Building 4 in about 7 years. The three existing buildings on the site, which RCS plans to immediately use following City approval, are anticipated to meet the company's building space needs up to that point in time. A ten-year conditional use permit period is requested for Building 4 because of the uncertainties of such long-term business forecasting(i.e., the building may prove to be needed a few years earlier or later). Thank you for your anticipated review of this request. Please let me know if you need additional information. Sincerely, HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. David L. Ha inen cc: Renton Coil Spring Company (via telecopier) Attn: Charles Pepka Roger Richert, AIA, Richert& Associates (via telecopier) D:\CF\2353\001\KAUFMAN.LT1 • 4% .. :��- CITs ,OF RENTON fit: ..u. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 20, 1997 • • Mr. Roger Richert .: .Richert&Associates Architects 9311 SE 36th Street, Suite#110 Mercer Island,WA 98040. • • SUBJECT: .Renton Coil Spring Company Project No. LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF : Dear Mr. Richert: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods'have ended for.the Environmental Review Committee's"(ERC)'Determination of Non-Significance,- Mitigated for the above-referenced • project: No appeals were filed. _This decision is final and application forthe appropriately required permits may ; proceed.',The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. As you are aware, a Public Hearing will be by the_Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular'.meeting in the Council Chambers on;the second floor Of City Hall, Renton;Washington, on October 28, 1997 at . " 9:00 AM to consider the ConditionalPermit Use The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to•be present at the"public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week " before the hearing If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of: this publiic.hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 277-6186.• . 'For the Environmental Review Committee, • Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager . cc Castagno Brothers Inter Vivos Revocable Trust/Property Owners Mr. Charles Pepka/Renton Coil Spring Company/Applicant • Parties of Record FINAL IlfC -: . 200 Mill Avenue South•- Renton, Washington 98055 .::. This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer• - • • 0 Washington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Sid Morrison P.O.Box 330310 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 • Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 DATE: October 10, 1997 007. fi� u6 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning zo� 149, City of Renton, Project Manager 9 rj� 200 Mill Avenue South �704, 4,0 Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 515 MP 7.21 CS 1741• Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-Renton Coil Spring Company File No.LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF FROM: obert A. J sephson, PE, Manager of Planning&Local Coordinatio Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 • Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project, which is located on the southwest corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue. Our response is below: We have reviewed the subject document and have no further comments. The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. • If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File N -• .1 0 © CITY OF RENTON ' - -- tee® ..e,..,r.�i:; • .. _IL - Planning/Building/Public Works „ co.. t,A . • )00 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 cr * , r' 0 _ SEP 2 4'9 7 , pd.•o 4anal ; 0 52 5 CC * 0 —2 ;-9'7 CRES911 14 - ; fl 0564 �.S. POSTAGE �t i i• 7 Mr. Gary Castagno Castagno Brothers iIC ,,:�•U C H ;,,(,..T iitlii i:?, i ;it:f);.,.,ND 11,I ;�IUVi.i'. . , Inter Vivos Revocable Trust ..1,: t =( .i (.. :A?)I. H'I' ', IAEI ("tt,`•I I)'� 434 SW 7th Street . a0aI 4CHA<„ ' ,1 It 57,.E 1. 1.;it;�1v1 ;t�I . b,r Renton, WA 98057 ••. \\ ,_j_ '-'-/? rk,rs=' s/ Zex'S `-1'i la sill H.71'k1itti iditiidi ;:i i I i'i77i iiih'Y� i'di:1 hi a- - --------- -- ---------- - --- — ;• - •)—''N' CITY OF RENTON ..LLI k , Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 23, 1997 Mr. Roger Richert Richert&Associates - 9311 SE 36th Street, Suite#110 Mercer Island,WA 98040 SUBJECT: Renton Coil Spring Company Project No. LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF Dear Mr. Richert: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on September 23, 1997, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please see the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 13, 1997.:Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee(ERC) is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the ERC finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there Will.be:no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal:within the,original 15-day-timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor,;City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of •the environmental d"eterinination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period,then the.Environmental Review Committee will,first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 13, 1997. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on October 28, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the Conditional Use Permit. The applicant or.representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. • The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or'desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)277-6186. ' For the Enviro Review Committee • gal ...ti Project°Manager ;;. . .. . , . • .. • . ,��. - - - - - cc::;-.::_;Mr. Ewing Stringfellow; Mr:Craig.'Koeppler/Parties of Record - ' - . . Mr: Charles Pepka/Applicant ': : :.. Castagno Brothers/Property Owners.. DNSMLTR.DOC - '• .. - 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton,Washington 98055... 1 {r'F llJ This paper contains 50%recycled material.20%Host consumer , CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF APPLICANT: Charles Pepca PROJECT NAME: Renton Coil Spring Company DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Charles Pepka, requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 square feet would remain on site. Building No. 1 is 10,933 square feet, Building No. 2 is 13,817 square feet, and Building No. 3 is 6,194 square feet in size. A new 16,500 square foot addition (Building No. 4) would be constructed on the southwest portion of the site as part of a later phase. Parking would be modified and approximately 20,000 square feet of new landscaping would be installed as part of the project. The project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: . , SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue Mitigation Measures: • 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division, prior to the commencement of, and for the duration of the project 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee for the new structure. The fee shall be calculated based on'ratesin effect at the time the building permit for the new structure is processed. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3. The applicant shall be required to limit construction hours to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and Saturdays as arranged, but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. 4. The applicant shall be required to submit a Construction Mitigation Plan to the representative of the Development Services Division,which indicates the haul routes and hours, and includes a traffic control plan. Haul hours are limited to the hours of 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless otherwise approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The Construction Mitigation Plan must be submitted for approval prior to any construction/building permit being issued for the project. • • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF APPLICANT: Charles Pepca PROJECT NAME: Renton Coil Spring Company DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Charles Pepka, requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 square feet would remain on site. Building No. 1 is 10,933 square feet, Building No. 2 is 13,817 square feet, and Building No. 3 is 6,194 square feet in size. A new 16,500 square foot addition (Building No. 4) would be constructed on the southwest portion of the site as part of a later;phase....Parking would be modified and approximately 20,000 square feet of new landscaping would be:installed as part of the project. The project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SW Cornerof South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue Advisory Notes to Applicant The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these'notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for.environmental determinations. 1. Garbage and recyclable`deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. Police Department 2. Police estimate 8.53 call for service annually,based on the size of the proposed addition. 3. All exterior doors need heavy-duty dead-bolt locks to help prevent burglary. Any glass doors need an application of security film or shatter-resistant glass--to help prevent burglaries. Parking lot lighting and the exterior of the buildings need security lighting:' 4. During construction, it is recommended that the building site be fenced in with portable security fencing. This would help to deter theft of building materials and tools. All materials and tools will need to be secured when not in use. Theft and burglary of construction sites is one of the most commonly reported crimes in Renton. . Fire Prevention . 5. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 gallons per minute (gpm). Five fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required.within 150-foot of the proposed structure and four fire hydrants are required within 300-feet oft he structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 6. The applicant is subject to the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee as stated in the Mitigation Measures. 7. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout both the new and existing structure. 8. The applicant is required to submit a hazardous material inventory statement and comply with all requirements for the storage and use of hazardous materials. : Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123,CU.--H,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 2 Parks 9. Landscaping outside of the property line is to be maintained by the property owner. 10. Sidewalk connections to the Burnett Avenue Linear Park should be provided. 11. The use of ecology block with cyclone fencing is not the most aesthetically pleasing if it is visible from Grady Way. Other alternatives should be investigated. Building Department 12. Maintain occupancy separation for existing Building No. 2. • 13. Structural engineering is required for all upgrades. 14. All State-mandated accessibility requirements must be complied with. 15. The applicant shall provide a soils report from a qualified engineer for new Building No. 4, prior to the building permit submittal. Utilities —Water 16 There is an existing 18-inch diameter water line in S 7th Street and a 24-inch diameter water line in Talbot Road. Fire flow is modeled in excess of 8000 gpm with a static pressure of 70 psi. 17. The System Development Charge has never been paid for this site. If additional meters are installed on this site the fee will be assessed with`a"redevelopment credit. This fee shall be determined with the final plans. Utilities—Sanitary Sewer 18. There is an existing large diameter Metro sanitary sewer line in South 7th Street with an 8-inch diameter extension in Talbot Road. 19. The System Development Charge has never been paid for this site. If additional meters are installed on this site the fee will be assessed with a redevelopment credit. This fee shall be determined with the final plans. 20. An eight foot (8)wide utility easement along the eastern property line is required prior to any permit being issued for maintenance of the existing sewer line. Utilities—Stormwater 21.A limited level one drainage study was submitted with the application. Exemptions and thresholds of the final design shall be in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. 22. There is no net increase in impervious surface for this site, so the Surface Water SDC is not triggered. Full street improvements including, but not limited to, paving, sidewalks, curb &gutter, street signs and street lights are required if not already existing. Upgrades or repair to city standards may be required. Plan Review-Transportation 23. A traffic study prepared by David Hamlen and Associates (August 5, 1997)shows no net increase in average daily trips for this proposal. Current use as a trucking facility generates the same or more daily trips than the proposed use. Therefore, no traffic mitigation fee is warranted. - Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123,CU H,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 3 Plan Review—General 24. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 25. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. 26. Temporary Erosion Control, most particularly mud and dust control, shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 27. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 28. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. Development Services—Current Planning 29. The project site is zoned CA .Commercial Arterial. ig;tURREN :. « .ANNINGNT. N. DlVISI:<>. > IMinni» > ig ngla` }``<en'`> :>::>:::::>:<:::»::»»::>::»::::>:<:>::»::>:::<:»>:<:>::>::>::>::>:<::>:;:>::>:»::>::»::»;»::>::» URRENT.P�ANNIN. .DflYl. [ N.......................... iiigg • • On the �4+lo day of Septew►bei^ , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing deNevvv,w, -ttms documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology • • Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division • Larry Fisher • Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Rita Perstac Puget Power • (Signature of Sender) k • 5.e.e--vcr STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS • COUNTY OF KING ) • • / , I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that I D RA 1S CgC�r17-- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: -/ Z tf g 7 ))/17/(if ��✓h✓ Notary Pu r in and f r the State of Washington ; Notary(Print) MARGARET J-;Pl`�4L,.AR My appointment expires = ' 9/'; / . ; • Project Name: Project Number: LUhi • cn • 12.3, CU-H, EC.. I _ NOTARY.DOC • " CITE JF RENTON °mi. ° Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 24, 1997 Washington State- Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section . PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject:Environmental Determinations - Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)on September 23,1997: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF The applicant,.Charles Pepka,requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from,a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 square feet would remain on site. Building No. 1 is 10,933 square feet, Building No.2 is 13,817 square feet,.and Building No.3 is 6,194 square feet in size. A new 16,500 square foot addition(Building No.4)would be constructed on the southwest portion of the site as part of a later phase. Parking would be modified and approximately 20,000 square feet of new landscaping would be installed as part of the project. The project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. Location: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 13,1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)is based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact, error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments,if the ERC finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter,Land Use Review Supervisor,City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period,then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 13, 1997. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-235-2501. If you have questions,please call me at(425)277-6186. For the Environmep)al Review Committee, oth II n , . efAAAA9 n'hg - eject anager cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Larry Fisher, Department of.Fisheries • David F.Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources - Don Hurter,Department of Transportation - Shirley Lukhang,Seattle Public Utilities . Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom,Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) _ Rita Perstac, Puget Power AGNCYLTR.D C\ 200 Mill Avenue South-Renton, Washington 98055 ______ NoncE , , , • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION&PUBLIC HEARING - • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-123,CU41,ECF THE APPUCANT,CHARLES PEPKA,REQUESTS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW TO CONVERT A 2.8 ACRE SITE FROM A TRUCKING OPERATION TO A LIGHT MANUFACTURING USE. . THREE EXISTING STRUCTURES TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 31,000 SQUARE FEET WOULD REMAIN ON SITE.BUILDING NO.1 IS 10,933 SQUARE FEET,BUILDING NO.2 IS 13,817 SQUARE FEET,AND BUILDING NO. • 3 IS 6,194 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE. A NEW 16,500 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION(BUILDING NO.4)WOULD BE CONSTRUCTED ON THE SOUTHWEST PORTION OF THE SITE AS PART OF A LATER PHASE. PARKING • WOULD BE MODIFIED AND APPROXIMATELY 20.000 SQUARE FEET OF NEW LANDSCAPING WOULD BE t INSTALLED AS PART OF THE PROJECT.THE PROJECT SITE IS ZONED COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL.LOCATION: SW CORNER OF SOUTH 7TH STREET AND SMITHERS AVENUE. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be Bled In writing on or before 5:00 PM October 13, 1997.Any aggrieved person feeling That the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)Is based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in Judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the lime of the determination may submit written comments.Alter review of the comments,if the ERC finds there Is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there • will be no further extension of the appeal period.Any person wishing to lake further action would need to file a formal • appeal within the original 15-day timeframe.Written comments must be filed with:Jane Huerter,Land Use Review • Supervisor,City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055.If an appeal of the environmental determination Is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period,then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal Is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request.The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination.The appea process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the I Hearing Examiner In writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal.Appeals of the environmental determination must be — filed In writing on or before 6:00 PM October 13,1yy997.Appeals must be filed in writing together with the requited • the'00 Examinerr are governed by Citation fee with: y o R Ren ton Mulnicipal Code Sectionenton,200 l Avenue-11B.Additional informatiton 68055. regarding the to appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-235.2501. • A PUBUC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL,RENTON,WASHINGTON,ON OCTOBER 28, 1997 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION . IS APPEALED,THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THISy.�PUBLIC HEARING. . ?:._ *y t• IVS• fli z'1.; 4`� .t ::---..f.-- "--- -js:4:1: '1! iP,A r In • 1-10' i I ,moo�y ;;� � IS N. rr I • rrr }/�(,� s —L-= f—:!�l I I FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. PLEASE D O N AIO AT THE T Y 0.F RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVIDO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION I- . "•'Please include the project NUMBER when calling for properfile'identtfication.• .I-'I • CERTIFICATION ' • I, /ilniA7'r , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on s� norn 2 c iy7 ,/ Signed:---� 'l, . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) • • I certify that i know or have satisfactory evidence that h/A-Tr �1 NN 0 Tl signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and v.olu�;t�er'cd•�„cstyjQ.ythe uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. „Ns %,r6;~ r,: :,, Dated: q/ pi t " �1 n„a. ,:. . 'a _ a Pub • in and f r e S l pff. Vl .tor- -- Notary .) . , , Notary (P I) MARGARET.J•`.P'tL,AR My appointment expiGOMMISSION'EgPIRES 6/9/98 NO rAR Y.occ • . 11401r1Cill ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY • PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF • THE APPLICANT,CHARLES PEPKA,REQUESTS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW TO CONVERT A 2.8 ACRE SITE FROM A TRUCKING OPERATION TO A LIGHT MANUFACTURING USE. THREE EXISTING STRUCTURES TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 31,000 SQUARE FEET WOULD REMAIN ON SITE. BUILDING NO.1 IS 10,933 SQUARE FEET,BUILDING NO.2 IS 13,817 SQUARE FEET,AND BUILDING NO. 3 IS 6,194 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE. A NEW 16,500 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION (BUILDING NO. 4)WOULD BE • CONSTRUCTED ON THE SOUTHWEST PORTION OF THE SITE AS PART OF A LATER PHASE. PARKING WOULD BE MODIFIED AND APPROXIMATELY 20,000 SQUARE FEET OF NEW LANDSCAPING WOULD BE INSTALLED AS PART OF THE PROJECT. THE PROJECT SITE IS ZONED COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL. LOCATION: SW CORNER OF SOUTH 7TH STREET AND SMITHERS AVENUE. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 13, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)is based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments,if the ERC finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter,Land Use Review Supervisor,City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. If an appeal of • the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period,then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify . the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental . Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 13,1997. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to • the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-235-2501. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON OCTOBER 28, 1997 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED,THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. v .. �\ ,Iv ,��Ii ®;, , ini c444„,_,;„_ ��:�i i;i• raj ®, ",- • ,\ s• a S ▪ 6TH sr a IIM `� g 11 �rr. n , I• .,v,, ' 2 M.— I Iii ll 1` 'I ,a �te ; ;; gFPp Y0 II4 : , i , — ; I ,o ,, ,... . yyi ,.,. - .�7 2 j( , w . J.�: eoa ,,. i . , a ,�,� —1 I I ,;i,, ,�__,, f soo FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. ' DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ;;:::::::;;>••>:::: .. se::inclutlethe: ro ect>NUMBER::when;:callln ;fior.. ro :er:::fte.:..:..:n.::.:::::..:::::. ::.. :.::::::.::::::::::::..:.:. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. RENTON COIL SPRING CO. LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF Environmental review review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Location: SW corner of South 7th St. and Smithers Ave. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on October 13, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on October 28, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the Conditional Use Permit. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Publication Date: September 29, 1997 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot a t • yL CIT` OF RENTON 1111 `—4,. . Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • September 23, 1997 Mr. Roger Richert Richert&Associates 9311 SE 36th Street, Suite#110 Mercer Island,WA 98040 • Th SUBJECT: Renton Coil Spring Company Project No. LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF Dear Mr. Richert: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on September 23, 1997, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please see the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 13, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee(ERC) is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the ERC finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period,then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 13, 1997. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on October 28, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the Conditional Use Permit. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. • The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully,if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call meat(425)277-6186. For the Enviro gal Review Committee, ni h enning Project Manager cc: • Mr. Ewing Stringfellow; Mr. Craig Koeppler/Parties of Record • . • . • Mr. Charles Pepka/Applicant .. . _ - • Castagno Brothers/Property Owners . . DNSMLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton,Washington 98055 65 This oaoer contains 50%recycled material.20%float consumer . • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF APPLICANT: Charles Pepca PROJECT NAME: Renton Coil Spring.Company DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Charles Pepka, requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 square feet would remain on site. Building No. 1 is 10,933 square feet, Building No. 2 is 13,817 square feet, and Building No. 3 is -6,194 square feet in size. A new 16,500 square foot addition (Building No. 4) would be constructed on the southwest portion of the site as part of a later phase. Parking would be modified and approximately 20,000 square feet of new landscaping would be installed as part of the project. The project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue Mitigation Measures: • 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division, prior to the:commencement of, and for the duration of the project. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee for the new structure. The fee shall be calculated based on rates in effect at the time the building permit for the new structure is processed. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3. The applicant shall be required to limit construction hours to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and Saturdays as arranged, but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. 4. The applicant shall be required to submit a Construction Mitigation Plan to the representative of the Development Services Division,which indicates the haul routes and hours, and includes a traffic control plan. Haul hours are limited to the hours of 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless otherwise approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The Construction ' Mitigation Plan must be submitted for approval prior to any construction/building permit being issued for the project. • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF APPLICANT: Charles Pepca PROJECT NAME: Renton Coil Spring Company DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Charles Pepka, requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 square feet would remain on site. Building No. 1 is 10,933 square feet, Building No. 2 is 13,817 square feet, and Building No. 3 is 6,194 square feet in size. A new 16,500 square foot addition (Building No. 4) would be constructed on the southwest portion of the site as part of a later phase. Parking would be modified and approximately 20,000 square feet of new landscaping would be installed as part of the project. The project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. '3: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: ‘'_. SW comer of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination Because these notes'are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection;points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 4 Police Department 2. Police estimate 8.53 call for service annually,'based on the size of the proposed addition. 3. All exterior doors need heavy-duty dead-bolt locks to help prevent burglary. Any glass doors need an application of security film or shatter-resistant glass--to help prevent burglaries. Parking lot lighting and the exterior of the buildings need security lighting: 4. During construction, it is recommended that the building site be fenced in with portable security fencing. This would help to deter theft of building materials and tools. All materials and tools will need to be secured when not in use. Theft and burglary of construction sites is one of the most commonly reported crimes in Renton. Fire Prevention 5. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 gallons per minute (gpm). Five fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-foot of the proposed structure and four fire hydrants are required within 300-feet oft he structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 6. The applicant is subject to the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee as stated in the Mitigation Measures. 7. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout both the new and existing structure. 8. The applicant is required to submit a hazardous material inventory statement and comply with all requirements for the storage and use of hazardous materials. . Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 2 Parks 9. Landscaping outside of the property line is to be maintained by the property owner. 10. Sidewalk connections to the Burnett Avenue Linear Park should be provided. 11. The use of ecology block with cyclone fencing is not the most aesthetically pleasing if it is visible from Grady Way. Other alternatives should be investigated. Building Department 12. Maintain occupancy separation for existing Building No.2. 13. Structural engineering is required for all upgrades. 14. All State-mandated accessibility requirements must be complied with. 15. The applicant shall provide a soils report from a qualified engineer for new Building No. 4, prior to the building permit submittal. Utilities —Water 16 There is an existing 18-inch diameter water line in S 7th Street and a 24-inch diameter water line in Talbot Road. Fire flow is modeled in excess.of 8000 gpm with a static pressure of 70 psi. 17. The System Development Charge has never been paid for this site. If additional meters are installed on this site the fee will be assessed with a"redevelopment credit. This fee shall be determined with the final plans. Utilities —Sanitary Sewer 18. There is an existing large diameter Metro sanitary:sewer line in South 7th Street with an 8-inch diameter extension in Talbot Road. ; 19. The System Development Charge has never been paid for this site. If additional meters are installed on this site the fee will be assessed with a redevelopment credit. This fee shall be determined with the final plans. 20. An eight foot (8)wide utility easement along the eastern property line is required prior to any permit being issued for maintenance of the existing sewer line. ' Utilities—Stormwater ' 21.A limited level one drainage study was`submitted with the application. Exemptions and thresholds of the final design shall be in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. 22. There is no net increase in impervious surface for this site, so the Surface Water SDC is not triggered. Full street improvements including, but not limited to, paving, sidewalks, curb&gutter, street signs and street lights are required if not already existing. Upgrades or repair to city standards may be required. Plan Review—Transportation 23. A traffic study prepared by David Hamlen and Associates (August 5, 1997) shows no net increase in average daily trips for this proposal. Current use as a trucking facility generates the same or more daily trips than the proposed use. Therefore, no traffic mitigation fee is warranted; Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123,CU-$ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 3 Plan Review—General • 24. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 25. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings,two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. 26. Temporary Erosion Control, most particularly mud and dust control, shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 27. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 28. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. Development Services—Current Planning 29. The project site is zoned CA- Commercial Medal. :S' 13 ....i ..ji CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF APPLICANT: Charles Pepca PROJECT NAME: Renton Coil Spring Company DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant,Charles Pepka,requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 square feet would remain on site. Building No.1 is 10,933 square feet, Building No.2 is 13,817 square feet,and Building No.3 is 6,194 square feet in size. A new 16,5000 square foot addition (Building No.4)would be constructed on the southwest portion of the site as part of a later phase. Parking would be modified and approximately 20,000 square feet of new landscaping would be installed as part of the project. The project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 13,1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)is based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments,if the ERC finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter,Land Use Review Supervisor,City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period,then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 13,1997. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-235-2501. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington,on October 28,1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the Conditional Use Permit. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. PUBLICATION DATE: September 29,1997 DATE OF DECISION: September 23,1997 SIGNATURES: M l�� )iiq 99 Ziman ydnistrator i DATE DepartmePla ng/Building/Public �� r7 Works etst- ' S hastain,Administrator DA E Community S rvice Department / Al : I , c2o r Vol 3A 7 L Wh eler,Fire Chief ✓ DATE Ren Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF APPLICANT: Charles Pepca PROJECT NAME: Renton Coil Spring Company DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Charles Pepka, requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 square feet would remain on site. Building No. 1 is 10,933 square feet, Building No. 2 is 13,817 square feet, and Building No. 3 is 6,194 square feet in size. A new 16,500 square foot addition (Building No. 4) would be constructed on the southwest portion of the site as part of a later phase. Parking would be modified and approximately 20,000 square feet of new landscaping would be installed as part of the project. The project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue Mitigation Measures: 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division, prior to the commencement of, and for the duration of the project. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee for the new structure. The fee shall be calculated based on rates in effect at the time the building permit for the new structure is processed. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3. The applicant shall be required to limit construction hours to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and Saturdays as arranged, but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. 4. The applicant shall be required to submit a Construction Mitigation Plan to the representative of the Development Services Division,which indicates the haul routes and hours, and includes a traffic control plan. Haul hours are limited to the hours of 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless otherwise approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The Construction Mitigation Plan must be submitted for approval prior to any construction/building permit being issued for the project. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF APPLICANT: Charles Pepca PROJECT NAME: Renton Coil Spring Company DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Charles Pepka, requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 square feet would remain on site. Building No. 1 is 10,933 square feet, Building No. 2 is 13,817 square feet, and Building No. 3 is 6,194 square feet in size. A new 16,500 square foot addition (Building No. 4) would be constructed on the southwest portion of the site as part of a later phase. Parking would be modified and approximately 20,000 square feet of new landscaping would be installed as part of the project. The project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. Police Department 2. Police estimate 8.53 call for service annually, based on the size of the proposed addition. 3. All exterior doors need heavy-duty dead-bolt locks to help prevent burglary. Any glass doors need an application of security film or shatter-resistant glass--to help prevent burglaries. Parking lot lighting and the exterior of the buildings need security lighting. 4. During construction, it is recommended that the building site be fenced in with portable security fencing. This would help to deter theft of building materials and tools. All materials and tools will need to be secured when not in use. Theft and burglary of construction sites is one of the most commonly reported crimes in Renton. Fire Prevention 5. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 gallons per minute (gpm). Five fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-foot of the proposed structure and four fire hydrants are required within 300-feet oft he structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 6. The applicant is subject to the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee as stated in the Mitigation Measures. 7. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout both the new and existing structure. 8. The applicant is required to submit a hazardous material inventory statement and comply with all requirements for the storage and use of hazardous materials. Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 2 Parks 9. Landscaping outside of the property line is to be maintained by the property owner. 10. Sidewalk connections to the Burnett Avenue Linear Park should be provided. 11. The use of ecology block with cyclone fencing is not the most aesthetically pleasing if it is visible from Grady Way. Other alternatives should be investigated. Building Department 12. Maintain occupancy separation for existing Building No. 2. 13. Structural engineering is required for all upgrades. 14. All State-mandated accessibility requirements must be complied with. 15. The applicant shall provide a soils report from a qualified engineer for new Building No. 4, prior to the building permit submittal. Utilities —Water 16 There is an existing 18-inch diameter water line in S 7th Street and a 24-inch diameter water line in Talbot Road. Fire flow is modeled in excess of 8000 gpm with a static pressure of 70 psi. 17. The System Development Charge has never been paid for this site. If additional meters are installed on this site the fee will be assessed with a redevelopment credit. This fee shall be determined with the final plans. Utilities —Sanitary Sewer 18. There is an existing large diameter Metro sanitary sewer line in South 7th Street with an 8-inch diameter extension in Talbot Road. 19. The System Development Charge has never been paid for this site. If additional meters are installed on this site the fee will be assessed with a redevelopment credit. This fee shall be determined with the final plans. 20. An eight foot (8)wide utility easement along the eastern property line is required prior to any permit being issued for maintenance of the existing sewer line. Utilities—Stormwater 21. A limited level one drainage study was submitted with the application. Exemptions and thresholds of the final design shall be in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. 22. There is no net increase in impervious surface for this site, so the Surface Water SDC is not triggered. Full street improvements including, but not limited to, paving, sidewalks, curb&gutter, street signs and street lights are required if not already existing. Upgrades or repair to city standards may be required. Plan Review—Transportation 23. A traffic study prepared by David Hamlen and Associates (August 5, 1997) shows no net increase in average daily trips for this proposal. Current use as a trucking facility generates the same or more daily trips than the proposed use. Therefore, no traffic mitigation fee is warranted. Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page 3 Plan Review—General 24. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 25. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings,two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. 26. Temporary Erosion Control, most particularly mud and dust control, shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 27. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 28. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. Development Services —Current Planning 29. The project site is zoned CA-- Commercial Arterial. • STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE September 23, 1997 Project Name Renton Coil Spring Company Applicant Charles F. Pepka File Number LUA-097-123,CU-H,ECF Project Manager Jennifer Toth Henning The applicant requests environmental review in order to convert a 2.8 acre site at Project Description 437 SW 7th Street from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Renton Coil Spring manufactures small, lightweight titanium springs for use primarily in the aircraft industry. They are presently located in North Renton at 325 Burnett Avenue North, and are seeking a new location to operate their facility due to recent and planned growth. The business employee 53 people and growth over the next seven years envisions 100 employees. Three existing one-and two-story structures totaling approximately 31,000 square feet (Bldg. 1 = 10,900 s.f.; Bldg 2 = 13,800 s.f.; Bldg. 3 =6,000 s.f.)would remain on the site. A new 16,500 square foot one-story addition would be constructed as part of a later phase. The project also requires a conditional use permit and a public hearing. Project Location 423 and 437 South 7th Street(SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue South) Exist. Bldg. Area gsf 30,944 sq. ft. Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf 16,500 sq. ft. Site Area 2.8 acres (121,830 sq. ft.) Total Building Area gsf 47,444 sq. ft. RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF X DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. Project Location Map ERCRPT.DOC • • • City of Renton PB/PWDepartment ronmental Review Committee Staff Report Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123, CU-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFSEPTEA'IBER 23,1997 Page2 of8 C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division, prior to the commencement of, and for the duration of the project. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee for the new structure. The fee shall be calculated based on rates in effect at the time the building permit for the new structure is processed. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3. The applicant shall be required to limit construction hours to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and Saturdays as arranged, but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. 4. The applicant shall be required to submit a Construction Mitigation Plan to the representative of the Development Services Division,which indicates the haul routes and hours, and includes a traffic control plan. Haul hours are limited to the hours of 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless otherwise approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The Construction Mitigation Plan must be submitted for approval prior to any construction/building permit being issued for the project. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. Police Department 2. Police estimate 8.53 call for service annually, based on the size of the proposed addition. 3. All exterior doors need heavy-duty dead-bolt locks to help prevent burglary. Any glass doors need an application of security film or shatter-resistant glass--to help prevent burglaries. Parking lot lighting and the exterior of the buildings need security lighting. 4. During construction, it is recommended that the building site be fenced in with portable security fencing. This would help to deter theft of building materials and tools. All materials and tools will need to be secured when not in use. Theft and burglary of construction sites is one of the most commonly reported crimes in Renton. Fire Prevention 5. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 gallons per minute (gpm). Five fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-foot of the proposed structure and four fire hydrants are required within 300-feet oft he structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 6. The applicant is subject to the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee as stated in the Mitigation Measures. 7. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout both the new and existing structure. 8. The applicant is required to submit a hazardous material inventory statement and comply with all requirements for the storage and use of hazardous materials. Parks 9. Landscaping outside of the property line is to be maintained by the property owner. 10. Sidewalk connections to the Burnett Avenue Linear Park should be provided. 11. The use of ecology block with cyclone fencing is not the most aesthetically pleasing if it is visible from Grady Way. Other alternatives should be investigated. Building Department 12. Maintain occupancy separation for existing Building No. 2. ERCRPT.DOC • • City of Renton PB/PW D Report Department ronmental Review Committee Staff P .� P Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123, CU-H,ECF RCPORTAND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 23,1997 Page3 of 8 13. Structural engineering is required for all upgrades. 14. All State-mandated accessibility requirements must be complied with. 15. The applicant shall provide a soils report from a qualified engineer for new Building No. 4, prior to the building permit submittal. Utilities —Water 16 There is an existing 18-inch diameter water line in S 7th Street and a 24-inch diameter water line in Talbot Road. Fire flow is modeled in excess of 8000 gprn with a static pressure of 70 psi. 17. The System Development Charge has never been paid for this site. If additional meters are installed on this site the fee will be assessed with a redevelopment credit. This fee shall be determined with the final plans. Utilities —Sanitary Sewer 18. There is an existing large diameter Metro sanitary sewer line in South 7th Street with an 8-inch diameter extension in Talbot Road. 19. The System Development Charge has never been paid for this site. If additional meters are installed on this site the fee will be assessed with a redevelopment credit. This fee shall be determined with the final plans. 20. An eight foot(8)wide utility easement along the eastern property line is required prior to any permit being issued for maintenance of the existing sewer line. Utilities—Stormwater 21.A limited level one drainage study was submitted with the application. Exemptions and thresholds of the final design shall be in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. 22. There is no net increase in impervious surface for this site, so the Surface Water SDC is not triggered. Full street improvements including, but not limited to, paving, sidewalks, curb&gutter, street signs and street lights are required if not already existing. Upgrades or repair to city standards may be required. Plan Review—Transportation 23. A traffic study prepared by David Hamlen and Associates (August 5, 1997) shows no net increase in average daily trips for this proposal. Current use as a trucking facility generates the same or more daily trips than the proposed use. Therefore, no traffic mitigation fee is warranted. Plan Review—General 24. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 25. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. 26. Temporary Erosion Control, most particularly mud and dust control, shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 27. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 28. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. Development Services —Current Planning 29. The project site is zoned CA-- Commercial Arterial. ERCRPT.DOC • • • City of Renton PB/PWDepartment ronmental Review Committee Staff Report Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123, CU-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFSEPTEMBER 23,1997 .Page4 of8 D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. Has the applicant adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? 1. Earth Impacts: The proposal would result in the redevelopment of an existing site. Existing structures would be reused and a new building would be constructed during Phase 2--approximately 7 years in the future. The applicant has stated that no major grading is anticipated, but that 4 to 6 inches of material would be imported to satisfy the drainage requirements of the new paved areas. Landscaped areas would require the import of two to three feet of new soil to create berms and planting areas. The Building Department will require that a soils report be submitted during review of the building plans. The applicant will also need to submit a Temporary Erosion Control Plan and implement mud and dust control measures to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of either phase of the project. Mitigation Measures: Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division, prior to the commencement of, and for the duration of the project. Nexus: Mining Excavation and Grading Ordinance; Environmental Ordinance (SEPA). 2. Air Impacts: Adverse air quality impacts could be associated with the construction and operation of the Renton Coil Spring Company. Construction impacts could include dust from the minor grading activities and exhaust from construction equipment. Fugitive dust would be controlled through compliance with required temporary erosion control measures. The exhaust from construction equipment is regulated by state and federal law. No further mitigation is required for the construction phases of this project. Impacts associated with the operation of the Renton Coil Spring Company include the heat source for the proposed buildings and exhaust from the vehicles used by the residents. These impacts are controlled by state and federal regulations. No further mitigation is required for this specific project. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation required. Nexus: N/A 3. Water Impacts: The applicant has provided a groundwater monitoring report for the project site at 423 South 7th Street. In the late 1980's, a 10,000 gallon diesel underground storage tank(UST) and a 5,000 gallon gasoline UST were reportedly removed form two separate excavations on the site. This was prior to the promulgation of the Department of Ecology's Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) regulations. In May, 1996 environmental consultants performed a subsurface investigation at the site as part of a pre-purchase assessment of the property. The purpose of the assessment was to evaluate the potential presence of petroleum-related contamination in soil and goundwater in the areas of the former UST's. According to the report, petroleum-level contamination was detected at concentrations exceeding MTCA Method A clean-up levels in soils and ground water samples collected in the areas of the former UST's and along the western property line. The contamination along the western property line appears to be migrating onto the site from the adjacent property. Another environmental engineering firm was retained in August 1996 to evaluate the extent of the contamination and remove the petroleum contaminated soil. Approximately 185 cubic yards of petroleum-contaminated soil was removed in the area of the UST excavations and from an area located along the western property line. Residual petroleum-related contamination at concentrations greater than MTCA Method A cleanup levels remains in soil beneath the east end of the warehouse building and the southeast ERCRPT.DOC • • • City of Renton PB/PWDepartment ronmental Review Committee Staff Report Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFSEPTEMBER 23,1997 PageS of8 corner of the garage building. The report submitted with the project application indicates that removal of this soil via excavation could not be accomplished without jeopardizing the structural integrity of the buildings. Groundwater monitoring probes were installed in four locations on the site. Samples collected from the four probes did not detect petroleum-related hydrocarbons. It was recommended that the property owner pursue a determination of"No Further Action"for the site under DOE's Independent Remedial Action Program (IRAP). The project site is not located within the City's Aquifer Protection Area. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: N/A 4. Surface Water Impacts: The applicant has stated that drainage from the subject property drains as sheet flow onto existing catch basins situated on the site. These catchbasins connect to the City's storm facilities located on South 7th Street. The amount of impervious surface on the site will decrease as a result of the project as existing hard surface areas are converted to landscaped area. Temporary erosion/sedimentation control systems will be designed and installed per City Code. Therefore, no additional stormwater impacts would occur. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: N/A 5. Police and Fire Services Impacts: Police have estimated that they would anticipate 8.53 annual calls for service for the new building (Building No. 4) only. Several notes are provided to the applicant regarding safety, security, and the protection of property during construction (see Notes to the Applicant). The Fire Department comments provide information on requirements for fire flow, hydrants, looped fire main, fire sprinkler system and a hazardous material survey. These are Code-related issues and are called out in the Notes to the Applicant. However,the proposal does include future new construction which is subject to the Fire Mitigation Fee. At present,the fee is$0.52 per square foot of new building area. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee that is in effect at the time they obtain the building permit for the new structure. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee for the new structure. The fee shall be calculated based on rates in effect at the time the building permit for the new structure is processed. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of the building permit. Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (Code Section 4-6). 6. Noise Impacts: The proposal is a light industrial/manufacturing use that would locate in a Commercial Arterial Zone. As such concerns about operational noise were raised during the pre-application process. The applicant has provided a brief noise assessment conducted in July, 1997 by an acoustical engineer. The study included an assessment of existing noise conditions at the existing site of Renton Coil Spring (325 Burnett Avenue North) and existing background noise at the future project location (423 and 437 South 7th Street). The exterior noise level at the existing Renton Coil Spring Company 10 feet from the open door when compressors were running, but no metal work was being done,was 65 dBA. The noise level at private residences across Burnett Street was measured to be 51 dBA. For the proposed site,the applicant intends to confine the manufacturing operations to the existing buildings Nos. 1 and 2. When Building No 3 (adjacent to South 7th) is utilized, it would be occupied by offices. Buildings No. 1 and 2 are located approximately 200 feet south of South 7th Street. The consultant reported that noise measurements were taken from the residential area located on the north side of South 7th Street on July 29, 1997 and that the average ambient noise level was 64 dBA. Higher ambient noise levels were noted to be caused by street traffic volumes on SW 7th Street, and background noise from 1-405. In addition, some existing semi-truck traffic was noted going in and out of the trucking facility during the measurement period. ERCRPT.DOC • City of Renton PB/PWDepartment i, ronmental Review Committee Staff Report Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF 1EPORTAND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 23,1997 Page6 of 8 The consultant's report concludes that there is little change the relocation of Renton Coil Spring would have an adverse acoustical impact on the residential community on the north side of South 7th Street. Furthermore,the consultant states that the relocation of Renton Coil Spring could result in a slight decrease in ambient noise level at the residences to the north, since the trucking operation would no longer occupy the site. While Renton Coil Spring would have some truck trips (150 to 180 per week) associated with pick-up and delivery, this would be fewer than existing conditions. Noise would also be expected to result during construction of the proposal, and for this reason, staff is recommending a mitigation measure to limit days/hours of construction. The project site is located across South 7th from properties currently used for single family residential uses, and zoned for multi-family apartments. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to limit construction hours to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and Saturdays as arranged, but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. Nexus: Environmental Ordinance, (SEPA) Noise Ordinance. 7. Transportation Impacts: Both the existing Renton Coil Spring Company and the trucking business operating on at the South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue South site generate traffic onto city streets. The City's Traffic Mitigation Fee is typically imposed on new projects since they would generate new traffic trips. Because the proposed involves continuation of a use that is an existing development rather than the commencement of a new development, the traffic consultant preparing the report concluded that it appears that the relocation of the Renton Coil Spring Company would likely generate less daily traffic than the current use of the site as a trucking facility. Furthermore, the traffic report states that no significant traffic impacts are expected from the slightly higher peak hour traffic that may be generated once the employment projection of 100 Renton Coil Spring employees at the site is reached. Staff reviewing the Traffic Study concurs with the assessment, and states that no traffic fee is warranted in this instance. Construction of the facility would generate additional truck trips during the construction activity and staff has recommended that the applicant be required to provide a construction mitigation plan indicated haul routes and hours, construction hours, and a traffic control plan. Haul hours would be restricted to 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless otherwise approved in advance by the Development Services Division. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to submit a Construction Mitigation Plan to the representative of the Development Services Division,which indicates the haul routes and hours, and includes a traffic control plan. Haul hours are limited to the hours of 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless otherwise approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The Construction Mitigation Plan must be submitted for approval prior to any construction/building permit being issued for the project. Nexus:Environmental Ordinance, (SEPA). E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 13, 1997 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if Environmental Review ERCRPT.DOC • City of Renton PB/PWDepartment ]- onmental Review Committee Staff Report Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123, CU-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 23,1997 Page7 of 7 Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period,then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, October 13, 1997. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. ERCRPT.DOC • • . I • PLANT'LEGEND In • I (`i GCFSTED PALETTE ' ' I �1.� If10 STREti TREES Al.e RLBRl.11 9LARlxT SENTIELa.e01T91A Z FM ttiDRANf K i11.1 n• I• i Rl I TRIACANRUS'►YERNL'. �I • I I I ="uui. n-ERLUS LOLGIYA Ili • • `I\ Lai`eR TREe7 J I L J ' L — iira4` me atom.r►1A SYLVCSTRISTIUN'IiCATA• T •—Y— SQUTN 7TN STREET —'I ' v NRLBS p • MGM rte.xw,eA amain.MROERI]' in l 1 0. reNroftENs 5 RtUOEFDRq{Xr rEfte . in 1 v� I 1nFa{eAveLTet{nOAVDI �j ., a� 9 i _ 0.a • _ ' "% , o I> R�ICRULYc1111 ICOeIN 1C1.1%.rAat94lMA . Ts+�it„,...,....,,,.ea j•v; 0i1 g TeR18NLe�`RcxroSTArrtrLo�wulc9l J g b B�IlLvlrl�N ®n�o ® ,�°` ,ze5►: J `�,5.: 1 {. III R@ 3 ..° - `'0 C7:.p•: 1 ' ')) A i• FLOVEft►G TREES ® ®tl';y • 7• P� I EA TJ I :; CORFLS K0115A.INLUS fLOR6lUA AMR rAL7NTLTt ACER m•ricvw K i .'k'�: r.: =�'%� I UI \\\. LIRLPNTr.It LERLPS LANADE1515 Cr 1- — :t Es-[ T".`':: Ca% �• -.• c�-� ] 1 NATURALIZED RERMNAL5 onwur I 1 I %/41.11"7.: .': 11:10.}, 1 I IY19TA TILE'S BAFPOOl.5.rtreROCALL15_ Al • • } _ o \ I PLANftrG AREA ANALY515 AUTOMOTIVE� -- r 'kit . I I • PAFKPG ULAtO rLANfeR AREA 4.170 X MOVERS '''I ° I I����V�{� 7�U.�..UR1n FIIDen "mum-►'-►-i- \ OIItR ON511P FI MDT.ARPA *Z",G x V1 /ii : = o+ 11 1ornL aslre rLntnlG ARM zo.72G x Z I. .Pp:t ° �� ,.C�,1'L' !G�?' O PAVMEN1 AREAS ' •. :Y l I �I I r 9e1� ••=.ar - r ' ,i` .{ ® ORM rARSIV.MI ER►G 38.E x Z 1•14101,01 ° r \ PIRe LANE p200 x .... I @I Ixx � I y / inn, ...merauz c.a.l mnr �\�♦• �'�!o LaCRere WALKS zZo x a_ ..r IDa t"m I �� •i��� `\ .,_AND RAWER,c 4.470 x)/rnRR►G nRPacx.9Go x) I f44 v y • �: 101AI.aCMTe FLAW AREA 420.72G x)/TOTAL 911E . iii m-' ' o \ BomI x) 170!• • PROPoSP\ ,-�rS% n„ z • • /' 1 \ BLiLDIrr;N 4 a_ \ a0snr ► FUILRe B1ILOPG Mr a ° :�.. e o; LEGEFb • V 10 BE server)To LAVN a /ip, n; • • Fax IMM O LIGHTING ralute LML TNe TIE QP THE PCttL TABLE Z LabTFOLI ai 4 / •�° 1 BGYLL[RACK a_ 67::. vow BEtYA1 IJ7 /• •lC1rn•.n to. 4,\• goop9�o9 �1t111111111111 8_I i i e 5' • n COW BA9W oQo oonwu. ., op_• :•: ElAI-0GY BIOLIC VALL `g ' SCALE 1 30' FIRE memo Z • • " UTLITY ROLE • / 21 AUGUST 1997 — rem.5acee71 rate G•tit 1 . . .. . /--,;.::;:.,:7-;4.,.5-c.‘l:.ii4--f.'.::..Z:4i:.','-:.:';':,"-.;-.:';::);,.'i:,i:'.:,...'.:::i-."t2'-„"...:g:!.',''..',:;-.-'.."„''...',;•:.;.."i:.':!g.t-,,:.!R!,,::,;':::,-k,:Z..-1.:',i;,,.,i-::-':'F:-‘;,;.t::.,..,T..‘,:;:-.'I.:':,:•.''f ,..:,-..:f i R:,-..3,.!:..`,:,.,Y,:..,..,q,,....-.V•-!..;:..:'-t-,„.•',:-,,;:=.:,,.?;..',r.*,:,.f.:,...,....,..:7..,4..:-4:.-..,-...';.r.,.,'.:..,,,"!,y-;:,:.,..-c ;..;',;':'.,:;:/;,..:;.:t'•:;-.-.. ::.-..'f.......=.......:.;`.i,:::!..';.:-"...,.•,::..:..'f'':,''.,,.:':''f.;e:.:i.,•..:.2,..,,c:-..,:....,.,;....-:".::::;.:.'-:;„-::''.-'.':..,...'.,1`,.5:....:';;";.:!:;s:,.:2_..,;.,?:,:-;,.:-:••::;:.:;:';..,',.i..'_::-,,..^1:1-:);1::-.,%:.; I.......,-.,:'. ::•f.',....,:.,.,,.„;-f.:(.;.:..'...7:.'„,..,:7„!...:.;,:...-:.-Y...:,,.,-......-.;;c;..,;.,,t,...,;„,:.,:,:.,::-.-;,,::_,:,.,,:,,.,.,..,.i.,,,si.....„,.;...::-,-;:.:..,•.,.--,.,.,;.;,,:..:-,,:,....,.:?_':.•,.-:?,:...:,..‘;.?•.:.-,.i,..:-..,..,::.l:-.:;..-:„,:f,,..,-A,,.--.;;:.';:-;-:t..,.,,.'.-c.;P-L:,::,f;:;..*.7.,:•,via:',`.:.."i..:.7...',.in-,,•='E:.g'--.-,',/..P.:.':.'''..P:'.1.:.:.: 1._.:,0. 1 1 /,'..i:-,7y-.;. 1,--.,:,,.T7:.'.-,'.1.i.,...'..r,,,:R,T.:,F.ii.,;..7.'-.',-.-,.'.-. ,'..-:.,,:-k.,-:-?'-1-.n,-'.,-4.z,.',.,:-j6,:?Lfi;'.-, t.':..,-y...,.•=f.<-y..1-,i•.i4,'bl7l,1i.f.,,;.-.'",::.',•'c.-T..::. , Jesse Tanner Mayor P 641, ihiieiiii )g;;A0r!per49r ,„..1,'•;-',•,,-,;;1.':;::,-2‘,:."-'!;•-::-•z.;:':,„:'-.i..,,:r':,t-!-';;-''-,',',.::i:..‘:',,'',.';....''T,:-',.,.,.:.',..:.:,•..;':..:'.-:;::1..-..•.-..::.,2'-::•,-.:..;.,,:.'..:.,1.!.‘'. '.• ,..„...r.....„..„..,..„::.,..,,,u,.•,,:.....„,..„:. ..::. ::::,....;;;,...7::.1,,i-?,-,,?ii..:::.yr....: :..-.?.:..j;;.-:-.;::.:.,,::::;;i:i.y,,,y....",;; ,-...f,-,:j..,:.':..:.5,..:21.-i-.;-"...-...,,....:,.:7-,:-.;"ii..:,..;.:.'..i-J.2,......;.,..:.."-!....::.-:.-,.2_-:,:J....,,.....,-.... ,''',..; ,,:;4.:,:.1_,.., .4..1.z.....,„,,,...,;-..;:.-f,:„%:.!-,:,•,-.- -..,"...-...:'i...,)',!-..,:i:,::,--:::;:::::t:7;....,','-.- ",,,..-:;:,.;;;;;;7:.,.''..,s...!.-:. -:.:-.'-....'.,......l''.:1„1'..'' '..-::(;-:::.,...s.':...i,Y,-f.;'';'.:-,:.:...:.:: '„:?....-;- :`,'-..,-1.':',;.:4;--,'.::2;-,-*•.•:•;:f-f'••:;•. •,.•::':•;••''•";;;;".•;-•• ••••;-'.,••'•••'1..i.--:----':*•.•;:::•••••:••::•••':.'•:.1.'.'.-- ''.* ..'.'•-•'..:-';••• •••.4:..'"!•:"."?,•- •;-:::::::::-•'•:-.:..:•!;;:..':::;„•-::',.;:.-'::••••••_:::••••.:.' ;;; •..-',-.• ••,.:(..1:',-.:-..t...••:,-.---:•"...'..':-..T',.:•-....":'...,!;•.-''''.::•-..:•:•;••••.-.•.:'..--:::..-!=.,-•:::::::-:-.:•:',-•;'."•.::,•.!.'•.'..,:•••.-:.:",,.7•.`.;.:',-„,:7-;',..:-. .;,..,'"•-:.::•-.:,::::.:2:',,....,:••..2!.••.,••;,-;.*.,....•,:•;:-4 .••,..-.'...:.!.:.:.•.•',:......':;-.'Z-""l-•"-';.:::-•;.-r:•':-.1:,••••'.: ',":•••••••••.:...':•":::-_•••••'..,-.'•'..•••••.,:•-• . •2•::•-...'..i....,'....!,":„.-.••,...;.--y,"...j.:;•:;:•:-.:••:--:.::. .,;..,••:.-;-:',.!..,:.•,,,,.•„:::•::::;,,• .•...:.:7;i.....:-.•;:...-...,:;•••:,....;.. -•:..:.-:„..,..- -...:•.,:.,....,-.:"..:•'•'•,'-':-....--:•••......: :::::,.".';:••••-:,.:"-;'•:••.;:':'!,'_:::,'zY.::.,-:-.f17'!=:::"..-;.,': '....Li'.:-.1-:..: '.'..;: ';',.."',..':.ei:1'.•::::..—::„...:!1`-:::',',.,:iz...-.-...Z• ,. ''.....:-..:',..'...-:_I'1.... :.• ' •.1••f,./,..'7.j-::: '4>•::,::.-1:*;7.1-',.f.'...;',;.'-'::?::-:,.',..::.'f,-1:::"::,•.•!•-••:•'•:•:.;•:'2f:•••;;::-'•-.';::',•:-':;;•-•'--:.•:'..':.,•;,':Z--.:-..... -.•:;-..•-.•-•,•-,•,'I.-...•:',;.:•:•::''.•••'-••-•-.:•'.--••-•:"Y-•,•-.;-••••••.'••.•••.-:•••:::.-:--:.••••••'''••••••.:.:•:.-••••••-,•'-:--',•,%-;',:••••;•',...1'••- .'.`,.-•.':;•••';'••••••• •:"-.: ".• '-;' •:: ..'.• . :•,•?...-•::: •,•-;••-ir....1:•:•_5:::•-•:-•:;.-'j",..-'5:.::::-..:..•:.•=:.•••:,-.2•••,•,-..-•?!.-:::.'-,;'.'.•,•;-•:;:,;,:‘,;•f•'-'-.:•- i'C':•'.••.:;:•'-•-•(.',•'-:..;., ••••:....;•..:::•s••••••,:'=-:'•;';...•-•:•-is: •••.`/-1--.".:.•••••-•;•••••-•1-f.'.' 1:". ::1'.•'•!••:'-:•--•.-fi•••:::"",••••• ••••-'•-•••••••••':.•••.-•.'' ••• ', •• ••-• •• ' : •::ft.,:.,,-.:'.,.7.:.•,-::••.i:•-•:-,•-•;:' '.:';•-.'-';•:.".•'•'-,----.',••,---'•',,',...::'s.C-",: •;-.••••••••.--;`;•-•..•••..-:-._:.,••`-,-, -.••;-:••.;•--'-:,.-•:.',. -••••••:.:'`•:';:•••,••-••••,-- :-•'••••.'":•-• .••••• .• :!..-• - :.••.!;'••.•-•• - .•- '. •• . . . .'7•,•=;'-i••••:-;ri.'•••;.•:•.,•,:f-,-,••::••,.,,-..-':.•'';'••-.:-.•'-.--.••'•-••• '. '-,September •••.; ,6••/ -.1::-.,:••••:.• - ...- -•:'.-,•••••_, --....--• . • --.._ • ,:-. •:-.• • • ....•.•;--.":•::...••••";•••,:-..".••': 1•••,...1. •-••",..') • -1 :- • •:.••• ,• , - . ,1,:• •••.1•1•-::'.•:,,,,...'•:::••:;-..-••:::•:..',' _9, 1y.7..!...,-;:-.-...-., -...!:..--,:-..2.,-- ..,- . . .--•i• .••••• .. :::-..-.7.,.....i,-,i;-.....,..-..7.......... ...-...-....;..............-..• ,...:•:...... ....;:,-..........,...... .. - . .,... . . • _ . _ . -..,:::.;,,....,-,-.".:,,,-4 -,::::•-•,..'-'•-;•!..., ••".-:- .:.":',.::-..-...•.-•-• •-•''''.-:.•• •:" ' ;:—..7..••••-‘-', -.. -• "..- :..:-:. 1 -:. ..,- -• •:.;::- -:',-•,•-•.':?"- :,;•:„•,•:.-;.:'.z.:.-:•".•••••.;:,:i"..-...•,if•:.':;•-••-..;..:."„.•-::::,:..).•:"'• -•„:" .:".:--...- :. • ' . , • . !,...'-:,....:::;..Tf:/.„•.,„'S.i•-"i...,:,:::- :.:::„.1":•,i-.',!. .•:::::.•••••,:"••••"-..,-;:.:........,.,:•:••':•."':•_•,..-.•.-,,•-•..;:;:;-..•-•.,.-.:, •--......•••• :::',."....1"-•-•••':..... ,-i.:„ :-:,,;:•.".'_:-:-..-.:-•:_'--...-..,"‘„:-...-.:::,.".•:t.,.-....,-...„,..„.•:.:„....-;,..-.:-,'2,-.,:•.'.,. ,::-....i .: _.•.: . ..:- .. .,. .:. : . . ,.. . :•••,.;• .::::,••'..":•±-•::.-.:T. ,::":,"....: -.-:.•:.::.:-.".Mr. Ewing §tr.ing . ... . Queensborough .... . ...•_-, .„-.-.. ‘.. :.. .., ....., . . ; ..-.•„, . ...... .....-.;., ,,......:.,....,.,-..,..:........,-... .•••••,/..: •,.:,,, .:.• ..:, - .:„..,-. ... ..„. .. , , • • '•,;" :-:"'..;-F"•: :-/-•":,..::',5. :,"•.••-, APar.tr:IrT?...s.„. :..,..-,... : • :......:: ..,: .,-.,,..',.:....,.:,,,.:':„..r.f:;::‘,..,.....,..:: ,:.....,‘...,..:::::.,,,,::::',.... ..:..:.._,„_., ..,,... ,...:.-:_, ..,__ : ..,.ir . ,:, , : , 1 pi West Olympic Place S-eatile,*.WA•98119Subject .-..,:''....-..„ ..,:-.,_.,.:: .:,i, .',....., . ....,...: .:;.,-....,..,,, ....,....:„.;":-..,:..... ':. ...,:..._,:i:....,..:. ...._ ... .:-.. ..::.....:,....:,......'".. Rn.e6":.;:)..- ... .oils... P1pgC0:ii,3611)1• (File:No. 1_UA-9771...?3 n . .,...91.J_.,..-H...,..E C. ...F),.. .. i.: -._, : ‘.... „.... ........ ... . . ,. t..-..".:-'•:.",-•.:,:::•.".. "....--; •:Dear Mr. Stringfellow ...._ , . .. . . . . . . . , . . ....,. . .:_.., .,. .:‘:::::-.."::-:-:::::'•-• :.::::••••-•:". Enclosed are rnatO1161s you requested from the Renton Coil SpringndfidleciW decisions concerning •hNieddedjl thiso your name to t0 ... ....: ,...: ....,,..,,.. . • . „ . .the party-of-record list, and.you will be notified of hearing datesand ,.. f.: . ' ' ': • ' 'application •You are welcome to come toO.•our.officesMo tancdoanythinroeti inthefile and you may request through FridayfrOin 8O0,m tro5.0Ot p,m.. .........,., ,. ::::.,..i....„.......,,. '• :... .':::: , :..revieW the ProjeCt.fjle. There is quite a bit ofinformation . ' ' . - at the counter(a fee is charged for more than 10 pa07....7.the fee is$0.15/page..„7:7.•.7-„;...,:.; or r; $7...37- per wo- sided copy) :.',. '.. ,..............:,..1. ..,':,,,,:...i:".:.:.• 7. ;61 84,.... . ...f.;4....i,4:s,:o,..',z.-p:ay9...ii:. :tii::... .. regarding this project ... . ..-....,:•....,......,..,::...,i.,:..:-,;,....... ,:....,,,,,:: '...‘',...1:":2:-.:•_1'.'1;.ieefeelii: .. .'ee i(j.:. roifi.ie at.'-(42..:5)'•.1.',.2-'..-,,:::,-.....;-:::::,...„,...,.....„..,.:•:,„-,,,,,,,.„,. ,..r., .•::.,,...,..,.:‘, , .• ... .,, r. ....... s ..,.,. ... _ . . . . ,,.,,.......„.....,..,„ _.•:•., .....,..:,..,,,,•-::-.,••:•:::-,-:-..-...,..E:.::f•.,•,- :-•-•--. •••.: • : •-•:,:ii-,-... -.,-.-:•:••;::,, -,..:7,-:._-;,:--...-.:-:,...„-;;-,•: ......,,• ,•--,.... •..,.-.:,-,-,..• . , ,.,, f,--_-,,, :,..- .• -. - .. - : -,.- ::::::::•-:::.,:::....... : -----2,-.:•-•.: •.."- -,-1.,...:•-•:-•-•,,-:•-,•-•-.•':•-,%-, ',--:-..,•-••••'-,:• :-..2.•-...-•;•;:.-•••-::. •-.i-:. '..-„,:'-•-•••:•,,•::----'-'-;•-..-, .-,...:-..•••-•.- •:„:„.T.,•::-!:-..;:..f--:-...,;::::•• •-,-•-?-.7f,:•:::-,•--: --- -•••-::..1 F:•••••••-„-.-•-.',:::,...---..--••...-- 7 r-- --- • - .-, '. • ... ..-;.:•.;:.,;„‘'',...;:' ...''',,-.:1-..'..;-...'..-:',:"-:::' ';',...--.:'.-:'....:.:,!'...-...:-.:;.:c.;:- '-,..-.' ....:-,.. .;•..-i'-',.:...-,.-..,..,,:-.;;'-. :: . ..*::::''''-''''..--.;..:;;;-','''.:::;';',...Y,..;:::-.::,:- : .-,' -..,..... . - ,...'f's „......_. : -. ..-- .-: --. .. , .. • -.''. . ., . ::.- ...: -:•,.,-,......,.(;:.c... ':- - '-':--"':'-'---:- - :''':'-..'''...:.' '...:-..'....• -.'-'' :':-... ..-:;... ..' ;.::: .,..)':- 7.1-: .•'',,::',, -..''.. ..,"i'':‘;':;.....::::',:: -".•.:-;J,...,.:2;'.::;:r; .._:- ...%-''. ','....':-.: '''. --. ', '-'... :. ... ,:- . - - . ....-- ..,...:. .:._:',..-`..,,',..': , .. ., ,,....... . , .; ,. .• _. _.. -.. ,... • - , .:,. „ _. . . . .,.. _ ., „„ . , . .. . . • • , . . ., . . Jennifer oth.HenningProject Manager ..••, : -, . -..,•:,..•..... .:" .,..• . .......,r. -. ,• ••-•.:-. :.• . ‘.. •••, ....- .. ,:.-... . - .. ., . . ' .;. ., .... ,..... .....,..:...,.....,,..:.,.. ... :::...:•.:.':::.'-:...:•.:'::...:-.:'•.•.':,.......".:.":-:.;. ....",".,:.•::::-•;:•`:•.:•.''„ ,,•••;•. '-'..,-..":-,•,•-.::::'.-_,--."-•::',::.-2::-.-•.,- -:.:•/-:.:•••i•-:.-...,..-:.....-•••' '-,,*---..,.•••.:•••-; .• -... •s, ,:- - •:: :::-•:',:•!•••••••.:: '" •::.,..:.-",_'_":...".,'....,‘,.;:•:.;,, ,,.','::.".•:•:.-,,•i.:-k"..--••••,-•:,•,-:,,,•-•.---,••'...-,. .-...,'.:•,- .,.; - , •..._, ::_._••••••:-.;•.•.-=......•.•••••.- .--..-....,-;‘,.,:,..:,-. _..:-..„:. -,.., -2...-..-...,..... ..,..1.-.:•,,,•••:••••';•;,:-.. .-.:••••:" :•:::-",.-.•..-•-;:.•;',-,'..,;•.:.-:,''.„-.''.'i;....-,,-::.;.:::•::,•••;•-,i-:;-'.."*.'•-•;•---•::::.:,'• '.,.. :"...:',....:;;•;2:::-:.: .-...-;„.:.•••.''-',-::::"•• ".•••?:". •,,•••1'.;:;.!-.•:.-:•,•,•:'••. :::,,;',„;-,',.•:::2•:,;':..-..::::"t„,„:„`:•-1.•.- -.-:-•--,-.,,::::...,..,-:-'-.:•••.:•••••,'...•',-::-:"::,::,•'•........-.:-...,:,...,..-,..."„,..-1. -.-...„.• i,,......-..„.: -.. ••••:_,-.-..-;-„.,f;,.....,.,„:„.„-•.';.,:.:_,-. .,..„;:.-.:.'.,..,-,.,.,...,..„,:::•.,:.:•::::.-,..,„:•:-.-,,.f.f........i.:,.....r:-.;„-.....;„.:-..„.....,..-....•,•....-...:.„, „:..... -:'-;::: •-•-•: -.•-•',....,-.,.'. •,-;.,‘-,::-...:...- -;•••.;•:_;.•;-,.-; ..... •.."••.':-.•.":',",;,.••:•.;•;.•,.:-::.,,"''..,- ,-..-J.,:.;:.::-.7.'.•'•.::••••••':.,...:••••',...:-.‘r,..,:!..:••••,';- ;"•,•".'::';:-...'..".." .: '• ,.. ' %,, :".•'::":'-':::.-,:,.', •-•::-."••: :',.:• ••••••••.•,';-:•`,; -:.:,;,•".'?.:,-'-:::::;•:-,.•,:".;•:'--;''.,-.?--:/•:':::•:',''''•••••:,-'.--..•'••••'•-•^4::.•-:;••••• • :;--..,. • • -:„ ••...., .---. -2, •,...‘::••;-•:;,.....,..;•,..,_,•••:„.....-;.....,,-,.•:••,-,-.1.. .--.1,• :-•_::•,,,.••••::-..•••:•,•'•_::',,,,•-•,Y'•',.:•:"-'''' '••• '''':•: ':: • -: -,: • - - : :•:-'.•:::::-•:•:i?-'.••••••••••,•••;;;"-•:.'.-".'.•••....t,-""•.'.."•i'; '-':. -.';•••...''.•••-•:'-'-'-` ''' 11."•••:':::':'-'•••'....;••..•::'••••,''''':".:::;.-..:"'::••',..'::..1..''''.'..'.-:',:1,...:'1;..1.:'...',....?;',...-',.....200m...."iii.,.A6-.-ii.;•e South .,.Renton, Washington 98055-:-.,,::': ,,,,::....!..:,...:-....'...: ,,,:.,,,,,-;.,-,,,,-, ::_•;.-.....:,:.........:::..,...;:„.. .,...:...: .,.._ ... : . . ,—..., ....•„, . 9-03-1997 11 :37AM FROM THE OUEENSBOROUGH ~• I • '';.. ;• DEVELOPMENT PLANNING ,' l CITY OF PENTON ' 1 t3 0 3 1997 3 ' [. RECEIVED In11 Qf4l1 4` �7 e. 101 WEST OLYMPIC PLACE•.:SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 981 12,1PHONE ATWATER 2-6388 D6llael/re.rl•0/oaaanainN . • FACSIMILE COVER SHEET YA Re. ^ a3s- 2sot* celI / . . yes_ 2 77 /s16 • To:_ Xilifee---7.27c.Ar - 3-?7 yes_ Date: yFax #: z S-.2gi1 �__ 3 AZAr 'From:.7-.L ,.: Phone: 2 gf-//7° Fax#: 301-97 • Total pages including cover page: Re:_. /, / �� . — P Ca .--______./.. ..._f_. ...ce....ei ,.. , 4..444 .s,.. i-vd.......t....:: 7,44"7„,_ 't'^' vim- 7o ‘.44446-c=1, 44e..a 17;lt:d./ -- .,2,4ag14-4e0 0/ ir4,...,4r:e...co__ _ .tc- .17,171.,„,2_ •_,.& , /4-5/i/9- MAIN OFFICE: 101 W. OLYMPIC PL.. SUITE ONE, SEATTLE, WA 98119 (One of Seattle's finest builder owned&managed, elegant apartment buildings) City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Rata COMMENTS DUE: 9/10/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-123,CU-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/997 APPLICANT: Charles F. Pepka PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Renton Coil Spring Company WORK ORDER NO: 78268 LOCATION: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue SITE AREA: 2.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 30,944 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 s.f.would remain on site. A new 16,5000 s.f. addition would be constructed as part of a later phase. Project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water L/ght/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS g) / _C(./) aZZI-37/1--(.2ad >C /2J--/Ge--e'C--)--/ e- �� ce2 7 �-r� �� 7'7\-0- ,�Ca_ 1)-'60e,/ (Y")0/2i ,,,,4-2 &c.) -, a..e.../-€ C. CODE-REIMTED COMMENTS id ,..--Vrif- 7 fe -4C' ' Cli2 V C71A'e- /72j° C72D ) )_ 2/-.\c Q .._..) . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information Is nee`d to properly assess this roposal. !� � 7 ignature of Director or A o epr sen ative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Pudiic Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ct*mty 'n COMMENTS DUE: 9/10/97 4 U l OP ' APPLICATION NO: LUA97-123,CU-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/997 4//8 APPLICANT: Charles F. Pepka PROJECT MANAGER: Jennife1t1 th Henn?? PROJECT TITLE: Renton Coil Spring Company WORK ORDER NO: 78268 z�r�bC9 �� / LOCATION: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue v /nitt SITE AREA: 2.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 30,944 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 s.f.would remain on site. A new 16,5000 s.f. addition would be constructed as part of a later phase. Project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS • Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LightGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Hlstoric/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • • • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • • • C. CODE-RELATEDSOMMENTS • � We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where add— al information is needed to prope y assess this proposal. (7)27/f7 • nature o1 Direct r A horized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: vt,kict COMMENTS DUE: 9/10/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-123,CU-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/997 APPLICANT: Charles F. Pepka PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning • PROJECT TITLE: Renton Coil Spring Company WORK ORDER NO: 78268 LOCATION: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue SITE AREA: 2.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 30,944 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 s.f.would remain on site. A new 16,5000 s.f. addition would be constructed as part of a later phase. Project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services ✓ Energy/ Hlstoric/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet S3 ebb cc Cat!lS esti frat.c61 anti a /1 y,heat kd on v,�,e. s� t o c_I t . I \'I�1- --'r� cLOCY ^ 5 . ` hea t -duet/ dads pV 1ocKs to Jt J • e rat& 2UrigkLy . ,4n j 9ktS ivs fugal cut IR1i at- or) �. �cctui j1,2v 0( Shot K- resist-tut- ; (L - also Lio hap PU/ I z�tc e. fcvl1c/ I� 10t5 �(y Ob, 014 c fdrn nud et Ia Dl,�/11 shUtetiOn At comowI tui 1 , Site hey P�enact 1 uo; , f-aI'L. secw feii . Th i4 I it hL l p caw) t- ht; I d ui mccknals �-- vls, . I modals �- 15 � v t .anal (.t i i1 t-D b� S eavad .wh not in u.Se. . bw of "" Con u,C-6Dn S'tt9 /s OflL. 06 V kL rn05 f ; coftiu nth C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional Information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1% 140R7 •na,ure of Director Aut riz Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 RENTON FIRE DEPT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION RE1t`Jg1adSileET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Fm ��; 'ham COMMENTS DUE: 9/10/97 C E I V E D �� APPLICATION NO: LUA97-123,CU-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/997 APPLICANT: Charles F. Pepka PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Renton Coil Spring Company WORK ORDER NO: .78268 LOCATION: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue SITE AREA: 2.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 30,944 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 s.f.would remain on site. A new 16,5000 s.f. addition would be constructed as part of a later phase. Project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Hlstoric/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS AA-2-4--e; 6,0 oid ?/7-7-/q. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Vat/ 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 ti�Y CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM . NTO� DATE: September 2, 1997 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Code-Related Comments for Renton Coil Spring 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 gpm. Five fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and four fire hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of new building area only: 16,500 square feet x $0.52 = $8,580.00 This fee is payable at the time of building permit issuance. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout both the new and existing structure. 4. Access is acceptable as proposed. 5. Applicant shall complete a hazardous material inventory statement and comply with all requirements for the storage and use of hazardous material. CT:ss Precom 'I t CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: September 12, 1997 To: Jennifer Toth Henning From: Kayren K. Kittrick, Plan Review Subject: Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123, CU-H, ECF EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER - There is an existing 18-inch diameter water line in S 7th Street and a 24-inch diameter water line in Talbot Road. Fire flow is modeled in excess of 8000 gpm with a static pressure of 70 psi. SEWER There is an existing large diameter Metro sanitary sewer line in SW 7th Street with an 8-inch diameter extension in Talbot Road. STORM A limited level one drainage study was submitted with the application. Exemptions and thresholds of the final design shall be in accordance with the King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. STREETS Full street improvements including, but not limited to, paving, sidewalks, curb & gutter, street signs and street lights are required if not already existing. Upgrades or repair to city standards may be required. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The System Development Charge has never been paid for this site. If additional meters are installed on this site the fee will be assessed with a redevelopment credit. This fee shall be determined with the final plans . SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge has never been paid for this site. If additional meters are installed on this site the fee will be assessed with a redevelopment credit. This fee shall be determined with the final plans . SURFACE WATER 1. There is no net increase in impervious surface for this site, so the Surface Water SDC is not triggered. COILGF.DOC TRANSPORTATION 1. A traffic study prepared by David Hamlen and Associates (August 5, 1997) shows no net increase in average daily trips for this proposal. Current use as a trucking facility generates the same or more daily trips than the proposed use. Therefore, no traffic mitigation fee is warranted. PLAN REVIEW- GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control, most particularly mud and dust control, shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. 4. An eight foot (8') wide utility easement along the eastern property line is required prior to any permit being issued for maintenance of the existing sewer line. CC: Neil Watts COILGF.DOC I ^ City ienton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: kaktrn COMMENTS DUE: 9/10/97^ny nF REIv.rot4 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-123,CU-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/997 „T APPLICANT: Charles F. Pepka PROJECT MANAGER: Jenni &ol{ 15(ery PROJECT TITLE: Renton Coil Spring Company WORK ORDER NO: 78268 VIOION LOCATION: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue SITE AREA: 2.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 30,944 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 s.f.would remain on site. A new 16,5000 s.f. addition would be constructed as part of a later phase. Project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Hlstonc/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Pc4 the- 1"6646 61' rtated 11,rj David 1-luwti/ty Associates C 4i S, 1447) , -14.2,a, IS KO nt ewttit.e IN 4VeWalt D?414 vi/C fov t>444 WW1 c w 124€- T,rgt,h, fu(.111 f7 geheva -ar sa4",c Col mcz4 ) dal(7 „yr tLuwj pv osed wicoliefeictuvil cut 7ktiriete 140 t d/�� ,2.It t) atro t v6Vvarttt6I. ) U.) 4/2./4 7 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Si ire of Director o Authorized Representative Date DEVADOC Rev.10/93 • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMEN,T APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:SI `^'"'si' COMMENTS DUE: 9/10/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-123,CU-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/997 .1&� 1 7/�,Q APPLICANT: Charles F. Pepka PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Tot ennire 109" 91, PROJECT TITLE: Renton Coil Spring Company WORK ORDER NO: 78268 � o_ LOCATION: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue oL SITE AREA: 2.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 30,944 s.f. ®� ' SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 s.f.would remain on site. A new 16,5000 s.f. addition would be constructed as part of a later phase. Project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet ' 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 5t.e, V n c VW?7 % We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas I where additional information "Is�needed to properly assess this proposal. #C`C" ea-f qt7 Sig nit 11 of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev.10/93 DEVAPP.�,•�C •• City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ptah iIeu.)•Wa4t(oMMENTS DUE: 9/10/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-123,CU-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/27/997 NOFI�,F• WO APPLICANT: Charles F. Pepka PROJECT MANAGER: Jennif �oth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Renton Coil Spring Company WORK ORDER NO: 7 68 03 1997 o LOCATION: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue UIVISI SITE AREA: 2.8 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 30,944 s.f. ON SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 s.f.would remain on site. A new 16,5000 s.f. addition would be constructed as part of a later phase. Project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major _ Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 2 . b a O q/p/q 7 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional Information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. I Sig at a of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAP C Rev.10/93 © CITY OF RENTON ✓ , Planning/Building/Public Works . v• 06 T �Ct �4 = _._®__.,. ' 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ec ,�`` ". T.TtAttlifimiz--TIN-Az,'- ‘4, ‘.c. -ft-x,-: .1, , * 1 i Castago:-. Brothers j Inter Vivos Revocable Trust 434 SW 7th Street Renton, WA 98057 ice ..--^ CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • August 28, 1997 Charles F. Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company . P,O Box 880 325 Burnett Avenue North Renton, WA 98057 • SUBJECT: : Renton Coil Spring Company . •. ' • •-• LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF . ;:, " • Dear Mr. Pepka: - • :-, • The Development Planning .Section, of the City of Renton'has determined that the •- -- subject-application is,complete according to submittal requirements and, ;therefore,'is accepted for review. - It is tentatively scheduled for`consideration:by the Environmental Review Committee on • ,;. ou. will be`notified -if .any. additional - - :';- =September. 23, 1997. ;:.;Prior ao that' review,.:y iti : • • • is re uired processingYour aPPlcaon The-date of Tuesday, October 28, 1997 at 9:00 AM, has been set for a public hearing to review:the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before'Mr.'Fred Kaufman, Renton :. Hearing Examiner,will be held inthe Council,Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, • ":Renton,;Washington. The applicant or representative of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing =;A copy of the staff report will be mailed toyouu one week :•before the hearing. . - .:. Please contact me, at 277-6186; if you have any questions: ; Sincerely; : Jennifer Toth Henning :: Project Manager • cc: Castago Brothers%Inter VivosRevocable Trust , . ...:-Roger R. Richert/Ricfiert.8 Associates Architects acPitzii ooc . • :. .. 200 Mill Avenue South-Renton,Washington 98055 ." -. GiZ)This naner rnntains s0%renvnlari rnatsrial 7n,.rinct enneumar. i • ...:.::....... .. F.:REN . .... .. :::a VI r N: ginsosiiiimmi :: VI S :;:::::.::�NER ... W . ....LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERT:...:.•.:::•.: ::.:::::::•..:::.:::.:::::::::::::::::::::.: SIIE :::;... :::•:..":::.:;: .:; >::<>>::•:::.;:;:;:.:: > ::;i:.:; .: < ;::>:::;•. subjectithin 300.feet of the :site `: .>: .`.;: ii.. .' .,:::::':.;:::: =r?'>:::>:> r:';:':: \ • • PROJECT NAME: 12tv N Co;t SpIrtiot Comet APPLICATION NO: LUG - q1 —1231 CU -i% I EC.r f The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. ' NAME . ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER _. . . .__._.___.__...._._.._•___ Anderson Evelyn F 616 Morris Ave S Renton 98055 296390 0025 ' Atlantic Richfield Company 500 S Grady Way Renton 98055 192305 9070 Banker James E;Beverly E 405 S 7u'ST Renton 98055 . 192305 9002 Banker James E;Beverly E 405 S 7th ST Renton 98055 192305 9034 Banker James E;Beverly E 317 SW 7th ST Renton 98055 192305 9034 .. Banker James E;Beverly E 405 S 7th ST Renton 98055 192305 9034 Benoschek Kennth E 629 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 182305 9065 Beven Louise 1; Gitchell Ber 625 Morris Ave S Renton 98055 296390 0120 Ccs;Renton Housing Limited *No Site Address*Renton 182305 9061 Chaya Boon; Chieko 620 S 7th ST Rentn 98055 182305 9046 Chaya Boon; Chieko 620 S 7t'ST Rentn 98055 182305 9046 Chick Stephen P; Abby P 618 Smithers Ave S.Renton 98055 182305 9060 City Of Renton S 7 Smithers Renton 182305 9051 Fakharzadeh M Hadi . 408 S 7th ST Renton 98055 182305 9044 Fakharzadeh M Hadi 633 Morris Ave S Renton 98055 296390 0110 Fakharzadeh M Hadi 637 Morris Ave S Renton 98055 296390 0105 Frazier Kim A • 642 Morris Ave S Renton 98055 296390 0050 Fugiel Elizabeth A 619 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 182305 9127 Gonedridge Ross J 632 Morris Ave S#31 Renton 98055 296390 0045 Hall Viola T 620 Morris Ave S Renton 98055 296390 0030 Holman Daniel P Jr 627 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 296390 0065 Huynh Henry H . 619 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 296390 0080 Katona B Kevin 621 Morris Ave S Renton . 296390 0125 Laurent Ann M 628 Morris Ave S Renton 98055 296390 0040 Lundquist Marin 621 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 296390 0075 Madison Gary P 631 Morris Ave S Renton 98055 296390 0115 Near Frank J;Donna J 619 Morris Ave S Renton 98055 296390 0130 Nelson Daniel K;Maria D 633 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 296390 0055 Nelson Kent;Robertson Lauri 623 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 296390 0070 Nelson Kent;Robertson Lauri 623 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 296390 0070 O'Farrell Roberta D . 415 S 7th ST Renton 98055 192305 9038 Puget Western Inc. . *No Site Address*Renton 192305 9096 Puget Western Inc. *No Site Address*Renton 192305 9097 Puget Western,Inc. *No Site Address*Renton 192305 9098 Renton Fuel Company L L C 501 SW 7th ST Renton 98055 915460 0005 Renton Talbot Delaware Inc 707 S Grady Way Renton 98055 192305 9023 Renton Village Associates 601 S Grady Way Renton 98055 192305 9043 Renton Village Associates 601 S Grady Way Renton 98055 192305 9043 Renton Village Associates 601 S Grady Way Renton 98055 192305 9043 Schwartzenberger Dennis Cra 625 Moses Ln S•Renton 9805 784130 0545 •• Stringfellow Ewing 633 Whitworth Ln S Renton 98055 • ' 179060 0010 . FVF ' VED Sweet Gregory D 622,Morris Ave S Renton 98055 296390 0035 Swinhart William S; Susan K 621 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 182305 9091 AUG 2 5 1997 ,JEVELCsi-MENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON . f s • A, (Continued) NAME ADDRESS • ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • • Applicant Certification I, CJ#4'OL �?)K� , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) • owners and their addresses were obtained from: ❑/City of Renton Technical Services Records !sr Title Company Records ❑ in County Assessors Records • Signed Date 7 (Ap '.ant) , NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, i and for the State of Washington, residing at Q,,,n�.� � won the —1�b day of ��`s)- , 19 Signe (Notary Public) .:.:.:.:....::::....::. .:....:.::.:. ..::..... ....::.:..:.:.:::.....:..:........:....,. ..:.:....:::::...ForiCitv of Renton Use:»:�>:::::;>::>�:>�::.>:«::<::<>:<::<::>::<:>::<::>:.;:�::•:; '.::::::::::»::::>:>::::<><:::»::»> :°�':..0 T C TI �N" ��F•'•MAILI G » <>>'.` :>_�<:�'>?; ;; <;;.:<`. O O t b .cer ify':that'.n. ti ���'';;�..���`'�� ��;��R ��'`��• ;: ' : ':: e rt tnotices f � ':,;5e: `' Y. .::.......:y.:�..:.....:.::......Ce....o the...prop? d app at n e e mal ed to � ��E a �.;>:>::::::::::::«;>:.;:i::::.s�.r.<::;.«::<;;::>.';::ir:::::;.::::::;:;::�::>:•>::::>.:.E:;::;�:::<:;><:::::«:::::>::::<:>:<:::>:::::::>::::::: ::;:::y:;:;:;::.:;:;::'�;�::�>::.`:;•.�:�.':•��":'`'': ��::::>>: :: Ei<:'r each.Ilsted ro ert ..owner.:.on �:.:::: :... ;:.::� .:::;:..: ::<.::.:;.;:.,::::>:.;;;;:.>::.::.;:>:.:•::::...,>:.:�:.;:.:;.;;::;.::.;.:.>:.;•;;.::;::::.. .:: . ......;:::>:.>:<:::.:.:::.:�:.:;>:;;:.;: {• ...ti. .......1.::. .:.::..:.:... Signei „ > . ::::.; Date. a��:..;::�::•::>.>.::>:<::>: ............................................. .......... ... ............ .......................... .................................................................. .................................... ......................... ..... ........... ATTEST Su , Abed:and sworn;b fore°me :,a: tar Public;>In;: d;for;the.State?o ;: reSldl.,: 'at; ... :;.:::..::.. ::.:.:;.;o.nthe.... .:..:.::.:.day_Of :;•. ;:.:.:.;::::.:.: :,• N9 • liMpropAoc REV 07/95 GAR J. PULLAR COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/9/98 2 I 0 • UilY U� C� • • �L'Nrrc. . NOTICE OF APPLICATION + . PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS ' . DATE: August 29,1997 1 A Conditional Use and Environmental Review Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton.The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBERINAME: Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant,Charles Pepka,requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 square feet would remain on site.Building No.1 Is 10,933 square feet,Building . No.21s 13,817 square feel,and Building No.31s 6,194 square feet In size.A new 16,5000 square foot addition(Building No.4)would be constructed on the southwest portion of the site as part of a later phase.Parking would be modified and approximately 20,000 square feet of new landscaping would be installed as part of the project.The project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. GENERAL LOCATION: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smilhers Avenue STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: Project File Traffic Study • Noise Study Groundwater Monitoring Report Level 1 Downstream Analysis • PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Conditional Use Permit Building Permit Construction Permit • — Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager, Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on September 14,1997.This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on Tuesday,October 28,1997,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second ' • Floor Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave.South.If you are Interested In attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,277-5582.to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled.If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner.If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record • ' and receive additional Information by mall,contact Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager,at 277-6186.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. ' • • 2 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: August 25,1997 • • NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: August 27,1997 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION _JlUh st 29,1997 .---,:ii "l'-• AT --kera r ,'il } , I,. c / GENMALOT.DOC —I, I x--_ '°�••s�'• \�f_,_ • •;%.- / CERTIFICATION 1, N/1"I( (A✓A.//i I , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were p9sted by me in '3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on /4u6us-r 7,9, If17 Signed: : . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) /n,, I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that MA /A'' 'r / signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and vo1uiytk.�_a.st,par the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. "---771, 01 y .r1: dr Doled: Ola ` , — / Nola Publi i and fo t e Slale•�f,` g16ta' • Notary ( t)Prin MARGARE• T J PULLAR My appointment expir • f1OTARY•DOC . OtifY 0 A i R+ ru �N,Nrro. NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: August 29, 1997 A Conditional Use and Environmental Review Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Charles Pepka, requests environmental review and conditional use permit review to convert a 2.8 acre site from a trucking operation to a light manufacturing use. Three existing structures totaling approximately 31,000 square feet would remain on site. Building No. 1 is 10,933 square feet,Building No.2 is 13,817 square feet,and Building No.3 is 6,194 square feet in size. A new 16,5000 square foot addition(Building No.4)would be constructed on the southwest portion of the site as part of a later phase. Parking would be modified and approximately 20,000 square feet of new landscaping would be installed as part of the project. The project site is zoned Commercial Arterial. GENERAL LOCATION: SW corner of South 7th Street and Smithers Avenue STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: Project File Traffic Study Noise Study Groundwater Monitoring Report Level 1 Downstream Analysis PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review • Conditional Use Permit Building Permit Construction Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager, Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on September 14,1997. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on Tuesday,October 28,1997,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave.South. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager,at 277-6186. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: August 25,1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: August 27,1997 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: •ug_ust 29, 1997 o• IN w` m� . f"' m Ikl 41 �,` y �� •s am sr - `�• id: \.\ "`"Yi4' old Q. . e5. i�' ' '.r.`'•_ ° RI �1 1-.,,!,..,,..„..•,...a ,,, Py \\ S n Y i 1. .• w �-., a GENMALOT.DOC J d p eap�y• _ a j \\ 10 7•!c' 1 _ IF I CITL OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • August 28, 1997 . Charles F. Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company . " • PO Box 880 • - 325 Burnett Avenue North Renton, WA 98057 • ' SUBJECT: Renton Coil Spring Company LUA-97-123,CU-H,ECF : . Dear Mr. Pepka: The Development Planning .Section of the City of Renton has determined that the ' subject application is complete according to submittal.requirements and, therefore, is .accepted for review. ': '_�� •• It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on " September 23, 1997. ';..Prior to `that -review,'you will' be notified if .any additional _ information is required to - `continue processing your application: The date of Tuesday, October 28, 1997 at 9:00 AM, has been set for a public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton . - ... • Hearing Examiner,will be held in the Council Chambers on-the second floor of City Hall, • Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative of the applicant is required to be •. present at the public hearing:- A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week • before the hearing. Please contact me, at 277-6186, if you have any questions: Sincerely, 416, Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager • cc: Castago Brothers/Inter Vivos Revocable Trust ; • Roger R. Richert/Richert&Associates Architects • 200 Mill Avenue South-Renton, Washington 98055 © • •. This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer. ::..:....CEO. :�:::���.�.:'::�.'�:.:.:::.:�:::ii::y�'::,i.'.::•.+;,•.;:::.: ;x:;;;:! ..>:::�::.:i>:::i!'::;>:::::::::::,,.,y:.:::.;'.?::::::is�iii:,:::::�i>:'...:.:::j%i::::is�,:�:•i::isis�:::'�":':::i:::;��::?':::f::•,::•�.':.:: J %i:::i:::::�i::::::::% `TER ., ►. '1P .IG�- ►` 'IO >P:ROJECT:'INFO Illl ditional:` Note:::>lfthere':is;:more;;tian.'`9iie'tegal:>:.:wrie.:P..>::.:;::::>a.;:::::.::;.;;.;;.;:.;::•;:..>:;.:.:::::>::;::s: notarized''MasterApplcafon f r. a h PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Castagno Brothers Renton Coil Spring Company N•AME' Inter Vivos Revocable Trust PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 434 SW 7th Street 434 SW 7th Street SIN C,OVIa_i p-F Renton , WA 98057 9,11.11.4_, Smirkaiv�,S CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Renton 98057 Washington 192305-.9025.�:09 192305-9024-001'51- TELEPHONE NUMBER: Gary Castagno EXISTING LAND USE(S): 206-624-3626 LTS Trucking Company Warehouse Storage g : 'APPLI:CANT>: �f::``othierah' rti`<owne :.. Bryant Motors Bus Storage PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: Charles F. Pepka Renton Coil Spring Company Light Manufacturing Business COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMP.REHENSIYEcPLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Employment area - commercial Renton Coil Spring Company ADDRESS Post Office Box 880 325 Burnett Avenue North PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): n/a CITY: Renton ZIP: 98057-0880 EXISTING'ZONING: Washington • arterial commercil' •(CA)• ` ` TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-255-1453 , PROPOSED ZONING.(if applicable):. • ' n a • SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: Roger R. Richert 2 . 8 acres . • COMPANY (if applicable): Richert & Associates PROJECT VALUE: Architects $1 ,300 ,000 . 00` ' ADDRESS: 9311 SE 36th Street — Suite 110 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION"AREA? no CITY: Mercer Island ZIP: 98040 Washington IS THE SITE LOCATE D IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? no 206-232-1700 TELEPHONE NUMBER: .;::;;:..,:li:::;::.:: »:<:>::::_>::>::»:LEG AL:>DESC RI ON:>:O F::::PRO.P.ERTY : Attach:>. a ... a .if::necessar... >:<:»>::»:«:>;::>::,::;;:,:, 1 ' see attached ,I 'I Ii ,I d 4 . 1I d ::::::>::::> >YPE:: F:AP.PL ;. ..TI N:&::F E »<><$iii!>: :< iBili:>i$iiii:> >>> ><iNiiii.::::. . 0 lCA 0 E ><>Check>all'' .. lrca. i n::< 'es>' ha l . -.Ci .:s ff will>determine.>fee ...::>::>:>:::>:<::::>:>: <::;' : :.::;:.::::::::<:>:::<:::;:>>:<:::::>::::>: a . t v..... ..t . .t..a .. .. to..... . . .. . s............................... . iI Q ANNEXATION I $ SUBDIVISION: — COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ Ii _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ ' TENTATIVE PLAT $ , - x CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $2 0 0 0 . 0 0 _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ II 11 _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _FINAL PLAT $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $— (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ , _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) I PRELIMINARY 'I _WAIVER $ ,_ FINAL .I _WETLAND PERMIT $ Ii _ ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: iiI SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ I 'III _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charae IXENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $500 . 00 1 REVISION i $ Renton Coil Spring Company and we are C Cc)\r 2 I, (Print Name)ACharles F. l epka declare that (please check one)._the owner of the property involved in this application, X the authorized representativtto act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and,correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 1 II II I By: Renton_ Coil Spring Company iI ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and d Charles F . Pepka, President foi{the State of Wash. residing at I (Name:of r/Repr-,- . hie) n�ri. ,on the 7 day of II (SSgnature off u,. i R;. entative) iignat re of Nota blic) .........................................:;::.;:.>: Th s::section»to::be:com ete ...b ..0 Staff...)........................ .. .:.:..:. '.:::•i:v: . .i',.{:::.:::::::`x•ii::i::i: .; �: ..:v: ��: i .:t':.•,'.i::i':v. ':;$:;:;::.!. :<:. :�:.>:>Clt :::fills>:N.umher:>:< •� :: ::.:.:::::: .. ::.: :;.:::�:::::A:::.>AAOs:::>SSP::<:::>::CAp:=S<::>::CA....t�........ .... .. . .............. :;:. :::..... :: A-: :::>: PL- :.>;>: : PL=.: ::::: »:>:.S <>TP:<<:>: .>::<':::::::::»::: <«::>'>:: :;::;: F( ; :> . .;. D::«: :P�P :>� :>::>R . P<:»:::SA=A . S.. H....SN.. .A....SH .. ..H.....5 ...>S.M...... .T......W................ M ..F.:...PPU .......F ....F.R......VM.... ;.. : ::.:::. ..,. . :A;:•:: ;:.:.:. .. :.<. * »:::;:;:.;::; . :T ;. .:a<:. .:t ,:.:;:' .;:.;::.;::::::::;.;;;:;.:;i:sn:.;>:.:. . .., :.....:';' :'::..: :.:::.::.:.::.:::.:::.;:. ..:;:.::T TA .OSTAGE<'PROV)DEQ.:.::.>�::.:.::::._.:! . :.:::.:>:.;:.::.:::.;.;:.>::.;:.;:.:. :::. MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 9/96 .a. RENTON COIL SPRINGS COMPANY (legal description for proposed new location at 434 SW 7th Street) LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19; TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND RUNNING THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 775.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 30 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE WEST ALONG A LINE 30 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION A DISTANCE OF 238 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1013.23 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 435.65 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID LINE WITH A LINE WHICH IS 30 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 275.4 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7604300800. • 9039.doc RENTON COIL SPRINGS (RCS) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about our proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects: The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of Checklist for Non-project Proposals: Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions (part D). For non-project actions,the references in the checklist to the works "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal", "proposer", and "affected geographic area", respectively. . • RECEIVED AUG 2 5 1997 Richert&Associates Page 1 of 15 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON 9039-env.doc • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Renton Coil Spring Company headquarters and manufacturing facility. 2. Name of applicant: Renton Coil Spring Company 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Renton Coil Spring Company Attn: Charles F. Pepka, President 325 Burnett Avenue North Renton, WA 98057-0880 phone: 425-255-1453 fax: 425-228-0780 Contact: Mr. Roger R. Richert Richert &Associates 9311 SE 36th Street—Suite 110 Mercer Island, WA 98040 phone: 206-232-1700 fax: 206-232-1706 4. Date checklist prepared: August 6, 1997 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Washington 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The proposed-timing for occupancy of-the three existing buildings-on this site is in late 1997. The proposed future additional building is planned within the next 7 years, depending upon growth of the company. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Yes. After occupancy of the existing facilities and completion of the related tenant improvements, a future (approximate 18,000 SF) additional building is planned, subject to future growth of the company. Page 2 of 15 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directlyrelated to this proposal. p p GeoEngineers has conducted geoenvironmental services related to subsurface investigation and remedial excavation activities on the site. See attached reports from GeoEngineers (dated January 6, 1997, and May 7, 1997). 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No known pending applications. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. • public works permits (City of Renton) • tenant improvement permits (City of Renton) • building permit for the future building (City of Renton) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The project is for the future home of the Renton Coil Spring Company's light manufacturing business. The 2.8 acre site contains three existing buildings: building no.-1 (approx. 10,900 SF) one story; building no. 2 (approx 13,800 SF) two story; and building no. 3 (approx. 6,000 SF) one story. Buildings 1 & 2 are connected. An additional future one story (approx. 18,000 SF) building is planned. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located at 437 SW 7th Street,,Renton, Washington (at South 7th Street and Talbot Road South). Section 19, Township 23 North, R5E. See attached legal description. Also, see attached site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): oiling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. Page 3 of 15 ' r " b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? There are no steep slopes on this site. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mulch)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the USDA Soil Conservation Service's King County Soil Survey, the soil on the site is classified as Urban Land (UR). It is gravelly sandy loam to gravelly loam. Over the top of this on existing drives & parking areas is densely compacted sand & gravel. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The proposed site will be designed to follow the natural terrain to the maximum extent feasible. The basic topographic features will not be altered by the proposed project. No major grading is anticipated. There will be some (4 to 6 inches) of imported material to satisfy the drainage requirements of the new paved areas. For planting areas, potentially 2 to 3 feet of new soil will be imported to satisfy the City's request for berms & planting. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. There will be some potential for erosion resulting from the proposed site work. This will be mitigated by construction of temporary erosion and sedimentation control facilities to be approved by the City. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The site is already 100% covered with impervious surfaces consisting of. pavement and well compacted gravel area which were used by heavy trucks for many years. The proposal calls for 25% of the site to consist of landscaped areas and the remaining 75% to be covered by impervious surfaces. Page 4 of 15 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. An approved temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be implemented during construction of the site improvements. This plan will include use of fabric fences or other drainage control features to mitigate potential erosion. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some dust may be created during site work construction. Automobile exhaust emissions will be created by employee automobiles and delivery trucks. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. The primary off-site emissions would come from auto traffic,on South 7th Street & Talbot Road South. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. During site construction, exposed dry areas will be periodically wetted to reduce dust emissions. 3. WATER a. Surface. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. -2) .Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. Page 5 of 15 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. Page 6 of 15 c. Water Runoff(including storm water). 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The drainage from the subject property drains as sheet flow into existing catch basins situated on the site. These basins then are connected to the storm facilities located on South 7th Street. The existing facilities on South 7th Street consist of a 24-inch storm pipe directing the flow westerly on South 7th Street until it reaches the P-1 Channel approximately 1.5 miles from the site. Because the percentage of the site covered by impervious surfaces will decrease from 100% to 75%, the proposal will not increase runoff. Thus no storm water detention facilities are proposed for this site. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. Temporary erosion/sedimentation control systems will be designed and installed per the City of Renton approved construction drawings. Anticipated erosion control facilities will include rock construction entrance, filter fabric fence, filter fabric catch basin covers, and temporary sedimentation ponds. The existing drainage facilities in 7th Ave. S. will be protected from silt laden runoff prior to the discharge from the site with the above measures. The existing storm drainage facilities on the site will be protected and utilized until the new approved drainage system has been installed and the possibility of erosion has been reduced to the pre-developed conditions. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site. deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs ✓ grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plant: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ✓ other types of vegetation: weeds These types of vegetation are found in the small portion of the site that is currently pervious. Page 7 of 15 b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? No vegetation of substance exists on site. Some areas of clover & volunteer grass would be removed to provide for the required landscape planting. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Proposed landscaping for perimeter buffers & interior parking islands & related areas. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, ongbird-, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, •-- - , other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. Planting of scrubs with berries and dense vegetation will enhance habitat for indigenous birds &wildlife. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The primary existing energy source used at the site is natural gas. The intent is to continue to use this energy source as the primary energy source for HVAC & manufacturing. Some electrical power will also be used. Page 8 of 15 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. • insulation • energy controls • efficient lighting system 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. N/A b. Noise. 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? Background noise exists from surrounding streets and the urban environment. Page 9 of 15 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. See the attached July 30, 1997 letter to Renton Coil.. Spring _ Company from J.G.L. Acoustics, Inc. Short term — some temporary increase in ambient noise due to operation of construction equipment will be experienced during the construction period. Noise generation on a long term basis is expected to be reduced by elimination of the historic trucking and freight terminal use of the site. The noise generated by the Renton Coil Spring Company business operation in it's present location is less than the existing background noise at the street. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. Construction activity will be limited by any noise ordinances that control sound levels or hours of operation. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current use of the site is a trucking and freight terminal operation, • warehouse storage, and bus storage. Surrounding uses include a service station and auto dealership to the south, commercial to the east & west, and single & multi-family housing to the north. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are three concrete tilt-up/frame buildings on the site: building no. 1 (approx. 10,900 SF) one story; building no. 2 (approx. 13,800 SF) two story; and building no. 3 (approx. 6,000 SF) one story. Buildings 1 & 2 are connected. d. - -Will any structures be demolished? If so;-what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Arterial commercial (CA) Page 10 of 15 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Employment area—commercial (EAC). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Renton Coil Springs Company now employs 53 people and this number is expected to increase to 100 employees over the next 7 years. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. The project proposal will be required to comply with the City's land use control regulations and the provisions of a hearing examiner conditional use permit that is being sought. 9. HOUSING. a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A Page 11 of 15 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. N/A 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The height of the existing two story building no. 2 is approx. 30 feet. The existing principal exterior building material is concrete. The proposed future building will not be higher than 30 feet (except for new rooftop mechanical equipment), and it's principal exterior building material will remain concrete. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. ■ The existing buildings will be renovated with exteriors aesthetically enhanced with/by: • Painting/color/graphics. • Replacement of selected overhead doors with aesthetically pleasing infill walls/windows. • Adding of an "architectural definition" structure covering the main entrance. • Adding of awnings over 2nd story office windows. • Replacement of selected openings with "skywall" (greenhouse) window system. • Addition of trees and plantings to screen and to improve the exterior environment. • The proposed future building will be designed to integrate with the three existing buildings. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. -What type of light-or.glare will the proposal.produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Parking lot lighting will be added. Page 12 of 15 b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. Parking lot lighting will be directed inward. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Public facilities such as parks, playfields, and trails are available to people working or living in the core area of the City of Renton. The nearest park (Bennett Ave. Linear Park) is within walking distance beginning across the street at 7th & Talbot, and reaches North to connect with the downtown shopping core. It also connects with the Cedar River Trail. b. Would the proposed displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. N/A 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any. places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nation, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. Page 13 of 15 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if p p � any. N/A 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The main access (ingress/egress) to the site is on the North off of South 7th Street across from Morris. Egress will be provided by a right turn only onto Talbot Road South to the East. Talbot Road South connects directly (1/2 block) with Grady Way, a main arterial. See site plan. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will provide approx..81 parking spaces, which is an increase in the number that presently exists on the site. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No new street improvements are anticipated except for the possibility of some new sidewalks. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See attached "trip impact" letter by David I. Hamlin & Associates. Based upon this study, traffic at the site will be reduced by RCS occupying the site in lieu of present use. • Page 14 of 15 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. None proposed. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle ities Curren _ availabl the site:4411fla, natural g— tttMlb - - - - ep one nitary sewer, septic , , othe •i-ase list). b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All utilities to the site are existing, and there will be no change due to Renton Coil Spring Company's business operation on this site. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Proponent: AV Name Printed: t"i�. R . RiCHEr T ARCH 1T .T Date Submitted: S AUG• �7 Page 15of15 JOHN LASHLEY 206 271 0182'. P. 01 April / / , 1997 • City of Renton Building Department Renton,WA, Re: Tax Lots 24 and 25,423 S. 7th Street,Renton • Dear Sir • As owners of the above parcels, we authorize Charles Pepka and Renton Coil Spring Company to apply to change the zoning on the property to Light Industrial,and to apply for a Conditional Use permit to occupy the property through the Rearing Examiner. All fees will be paid by the applicants,Renton Coil Spring. • Sincerely, • stagC;;;;;Vo Brothers Revoc le Trust STATE OF W NGTON COUNTY OF ii . Sign=• • •w% to • affirmed)be ore me hS. naturit My appointment expires G' e 4!'a pl. d r1F ,:\‘d a �fi a�lTj yv \J ff// > w - N; HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. A Professional Service Corporation David L. Halinen,P.E. Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building (206)443-4684 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Fax(206)646-3467 Bellevue,Washington 98004 August 5, 1997 VIA TELECOPIER (425-277-4455) AND FIRST CLASS MAIL h u�£,/p D City of Renton Planning/Building/ AU.L 6 ti Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South VELOPMENT PLANNING Renton, Washington 98055 ',z RE`NTON Attn: Jim Hanson, Zoning Administrator RE: Renton Coil Spring Company's Planned Use of the 2.8-Acre CA-Zoned Site Located at South 7th Street and Talbot Road South Request for An Administrative Determination That Renton Coil Spring's Proposed Use is a "Light Manufacturing" Use for Purposes of RMC Section 4-31-10.4B.5.y Dear Mr. Hanson: I am writing on behalf of my client, Renton Coil Spring Company ("RCS"), to request an administrative determination that RCS's proposed use of a CA-zoned site located at the intersection of South 7th Street and Talbot Road South is a "Light manufacturing" use for'purposes of RMC Section 4-31-10.4B.5.y. I have described below the proposed use and have set forth why I believe that that use does constitute such a Light manufacturing use. Please consider the following. RCS's Proposed Use RCS is a manufacturer of titanium springs for high technology customers. The company has been operating in Renton for the past 48 years and has both its office and indoor manufacturing operation located in an existing building at 325 Burnett Avenue North. Because of increasing demand for RCS's products, company growth is making relocation of its office and manufacturing operation to another site a necessity. RCS has entered into an agreement to purchase a 2.8-acre site located at the intersection of South 7th Street and Talbot Road South that is currently being used by LTS Trucking as a trucking and freight terminal and by Bryant Motors for bus storage. (Previously, the site was used as a trucking and freight terminal by Renton-Issaquah Auto Freight.) At this new site, which has adequate space to facilitate the company's foreseeable growth plans, RCS proposes to conduct the very same operations as it is currently conducting at its Barnett Avenue site. To produce springs, RCS purchases previously-manufactured titanium wire, bars, coiling and sheet metal products and then, by cold-processing (some of it done by hand and the balance by machine), fashions these items into a wide variety of types and sizes of finished springs. All of this work is done indoors and, because of the cold-processing, no airborne or waterborne pollutants are it City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department Attn: Jim Hanson, Zoning Administrator August 5, 1997 Paget emitted. Further, at the new site none of the materials or equipment to be used in production will be stored outside and none of the finished spring products produced will be stored outside. ' In regard to noise, at the company's current site virtually no noise from the company's operation can be heard from nearby properties--what little noise that is generated is overshadowed by background noise. (The company's existing facility has been located across the street from existing single-family residences for 48 years and no complaints about noise have ever been brought to the company's attention.) Background noise at the new site will also overshadow what little noise will be generated by the company's operations at the new site. Further, because large vehicle traffic will radically decrease at the new site by elimination of the trucking and freight terminal uses (only about 3 to 5 large pickup and/or delivery trucks per week are expected to stop at the proposed new RCS site in contrast to roughly 150 to 180 large truck/vehicle trips per day under the site's historic use), the change in use of the new site should actually reduce the amount of noise in the neighborhood below that which has historically been caused by use of the site. (A supporting letter report from an acoustical consultant will be submitted to the City during the week of August 11, 1997.) Why the Proposed Use is a "Light Manufacturing" Use RMC Section 4-31-10.4B.5.y sets forth one of the Hearing Examiner Conditional Uses for the CA zone. That section reads as follows: Light manufacturing, including assembly and warehousing of prefabricated parts and finished parts; also including minor finishing work as part of the assembly process. (Emphasis added.) While no definition for"Light manufacturing" is included under the Zoning Code's definitions section (RMC Section 4-31-2), that section does set forth a definition for"Manufacturing Uses" and contrasting definitions for "Light Industrial Use" and "Heavy Industrial Use". Those definitions read: �I MANUFACTURING USES: Types of land uses in which materials or substances are transformed into new products including construction and assembling of component parts, and the blending of materials such as lubricating oils, plastics, resins or liquors. INDUSTRIAL USE, LIGHT: A type of land use including small scale or less intensive production, manufacturing, distribution or fabricating activities. May also include office and supporting convenience retail activities. INDUSTRIAL USE,HEAVY: A type of land use including manufacturing processes using raw materials, extractive land uses or any industrial uses which typically are incompatible with other uses due to noise,odor,toxic chemicals or other activities li City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department Attn: Jim Hanson, Zoning Administrator August 5, 1997 Page 3 posing a hazard to public health and safety. (Emphasis added.) Certainly, RCS's proposed use of the South 7th Street and Talbot Road South site is a"Manufacturing Use" under that definition. By analogy to the Light Industrial Use definition, the proposed use should be considered a Light Manufacturing use because it involves a"small scale or less intensive . . . manufacturing activit[y]" rather than "manufacturing processes using raw materials". Renton Coil Spring does not manufacture titanium from raw materials. Instead, as pointed out above, it makes finished springs from previously-manufactured titanium products (wire, bars, coiling and sheet metal products). Further, in contrast to operations considered Heavy Industrial Uses under the above-quoted Zoning Code definition, RCS's proposed operation will not involve"noise, odor, toxic chemicals or other activities posing a hazard to public health and safety" that would make the proposed use incompatible with other nearby uses. In relation to the proposed site's historic use, the proposed use will be an improvement for the neighborhood. For these reasons, RCS's proposed use should be considered a"Light Manufacturing" use for purposes of RMC Section 4-31-10.4B.5.y. Invitation for You to Visit the Existing RCS Facility Because RCS is planning to operate the same type of operation in the proposed facility as it is in the existing facility,you may find it helpful in your evaluation of this request to visit RCS's existing facility. If you would like to do so, please feel free to phone either Chuck Pepka(RCS's president) or Jim Vander May (RCS's chief financial officer) at 255-1453 to make an appointment for a tour of the facility. Thank you for your anticipated review of this request. If you have any questions or need additional information, please phone me at (206) 443-4684. Sincerely, HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. David L. Hali en cc: Renton Coil Spring Company(via telecopier) Attn: Charles Pepka, President Attn: Jim Vander May, C.F.O. Roger Richert, AlA(via telecopier) Richert& Associates D:\CF\2353\001\HANSOND1.LT1 Uo Calldilim Lazzoda-8Qo traffic design transportation planning 1319 Dexter Avenue North Seattle,Washington 98109 (206)285-9035 Suite 270 FAX 285-6345 August 5, 1997 RPcniED Renton Coil Spring Company s,,V,,'3 25 I 325 Burnett Avenue N. Renton, WA. 98057 _ mtvTpUNRMNG CITY OF ,I NTON ATTN: Chuck Pepka Subject: Trip Impacts Associated with the Proposed Relocation of The Renton Coil Spring Company Dear Mr. Pepka: The purpose of this letter is to summarize the traffic- related impacts associated with the relocation of the Renton Coil Spring Company. The company is currently located north of downtown Renton and is proposing to relocate to a site south of downtown Renton, approximately a 10-block move. The following summarizes our findings. Background The Renton Coil Spring Company is currently located at 325 Burnett Avenue North, and is planning to relocate to a site located on the southwest corner of S. 7th Street and Talbot Road South. The purpose for the relocation is to allow expansion of a growing work-force. The business currently employs 53 people and may eventually grow to 100 people over the next several years. As we understand, the type of business which best describes Renton Coil Spring is "light manufacturing". The S. 7th Street and Talbot Road site is a 2.8-acre parcel currently occupied by trucking and bus storage companies. Prior to the current tenants, Renton-Issaquah Auto Freight operated a similar business on the site for almost 30 years, until 1993; that company engaged in trucking and overnight staging operations. A large share of the traffic associated with the current tenants is truck-oriented. A large share of the traffic previously generated on the site by Renton-Issaquah Auto Freight was also truck-oriented, Under the current proposal, the three existing building structures on the S. 7th Street and Talbot Road site would be remodeled to accommodate Renton Coil Spring, plus a 4th building would be constructed sometime in the future. f 1 4 • Trip Generation ;I Both the existing Renton Coil Spring site and the proposed S. 7th Street and Talbot Road site are currently generating traffic onto Renton Citystreets. Pursuant to Renton City Council Resolution No. 3100, the lity of Renton ordinarily imposes a traffic mitigation fee of $75 per daily trip for "new development that is subject to SEPA review". Because the proposal involves continuation of the use of an existing development rather than commencement of use of a new development, the question that needs to be considered is whether or not the proposed use of the S. 7th Street and Talbot Road site by Renton Coil Spring will cause any net traffic impact when viewed in relation to the site's historical fuse. In order to determine what change) in traffic can be expected at the S. 7th Street and Talbot Road site, we have estimated the trip generation for the site for both (a) the historic trucking operation(s) and (b) Renton Coil Spring. Data from both the ITE Trip Generation Manual and site users have been used. The following tables summarize and compare the trip generation. IF The trip generation estimates have been based on the number u' of employees in all cases because employee data was available Ifor all past, present and future uses. ITE data for land use code 140, "Manufacturing", was used to estimate the trips for Renton Coil Spring, and land use code 030, F"Truck Terminal", was used to estimate the traffic volumes that historically have been generated by the S. 7th Street and Talbot Road site. These land uses most closely represented the uses involved. (The truck terminal data has also been estimated based on information provided by the property owner and former site occupant, who indicated a historical range of 35-50 employees and 50 F trucks on-site. The property owner also indicated that the I� current tenant operates a similar business. ) I i it 2 II r TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION* RENTON COIL SPRING i ' EXISTING 53 FUTURE 100 TIME PERIOD EMP. TRIPS EMP. TRIPS Daily 111 209 AM Peak Enter 21 40 Exit 2 3 Total 23 43 PM Peak Enter 11 21 Exit 10 18 Total 21 39 * - Trip generation based on ITE Land Use Code 140 (Manufacturing) using average trip rates. TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION S. 7TH STREET & TALBOT ROAD SITE (ITE VALUES FOR) HISTORICAL TIME PERIOD EMP. TRIPS TRUCK/EMP. TRIPS Daily 244-349 230-290 AM Peak Enter 9-13 24-35 Exit 12-20 5 Total 23-33 29-40 PM Peak Enter 9-13 5 Exit 10-15 24-35 Total 19-28 29-40 Note: Historical trip data estimated based on an employee count of 35-50 employees (generating 70-100 trips) plus 50 trucks (generating 150-180 truck trips) per day, and 10 miscellaneous daily trips. 70% of employees and 10% of trucks were estimated to enter or exit the site during peak traffic hours. The trip estimates for the S. 7th Street and Talbot Road site based on the ITE versus property owner-supplied data are fairly close, although the property owner has indicated a slightly higher amount of traffic associated with the 3 J • `l site versus the ITE values. A comparison of the traffic 1 ] associated with the future employee count at Renton Coil Spring with the historical data for the S. 7th Street and Talbot Road site is shown in Table 3. ' I TABLE 3 TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON RENTON 1 COIL SPRING S. 7TH STREET/TALBOT ROAD SITE { FUTURE 100 (ITE VALUES FOR) HISTORICAL TIME PERIOD EMP. TRIPS EMP. TRIPS TRUCK/EMP. TRIPS 1 Daily 209 244-349 230-290 1 AM Peak Enter 40 9-13 24-35 I Exit 3 12-20 5 1" Total 43 �' 23-33 29-40 PM Peak Enter 21 9-13 5 H�^' Exit 18 10-15 24-35 q Total 39 19-28 29-40 , 1 A review of Table 3 indicates that, in all cases, the relocation of Renton Coil Spring to the S. 7th Street and Talbot Road site would likely result in a decrease in daily traffic generated at that site. This is not unexpected because the current use of the ;site is very much dependent on trucking activities and would reasonably be expected to 1 generate A higher volume of traffic throughout the day. A P slightly ihigher amount of traffic may be generated 'by Renton Coil Spring during peak traffic hours once employment reaches 100 employee's, as compared to the ITE trip generation values for the trucking operation. Conclusions Based on the employment data for Renton Coil Spring and from the property owner of the S. 7th Street and Talbot Road site, it appears that the relocation of Renton Coil Spring would likely generate less daily traffic than the ' current use of the site. Accordingly, traffic mitigation 1 • fees should not be assessed by the City for this project I because the City of Renton bases mitigation fees on new daily trips. Further, no significant traffic impacts are i' expected from the slightly higher peak hour traffic that may be generated once the projection of 100 Renton Coil 1 , Spring employees at the site is reached. ' 1I 4 We trust that the above information is useful to you in the processing of your application. Should you, or the City Staff have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, Geri Reinart, P.E. David I. Hamlin and Associates 5 i - L' — JGL �Li OCOOSTICS, IOC. !—' Consulting Services L_JJuly 30, 1997 ) in Sound&Vibration • Control IRenton Coil&Spring - Jerry G.Lilly,P E Preskdent 325 Burnett Ave.North 15455 SE 47th Place P.O.Box 880 : Bellevue,WA 96006 Renton, WA 98057-0880 .Pnone:(206)649-9344 Fax:(206)649-0737 Attention: Mr.Jim Vander Mey Subject: New Plant Site: Environmental Nmise Issues Gentlemen: i I understand that your company is planning to move its operations from your current site at 325 Burnett Avenue North in Re ton to a new site at the southeast corner of 7th Street and Talbot RoadSouth,als in Renton. I also understand that L someone with the city has questioned whether o not this move would create an adverse community noise impact. The purpose of this letter is to provide some initial insight as to whether a noise study to detekmine the extent of this potential L impact is warranted. Based on our discussions over the telephone,I lave come to learn that Renton Coil &Spring manufactures small,lightweight spring!primarily for the aircraft industry. All of your manufacturing equipment is located inside your plant, and there are no are via van noise sources. The majority f sign cant outdoor b your deliveries (approximately 5 to 10 vehicles per day)with an occasional semi-truck (approximately 4 per week)to bring in raw mat rials. The attached site plan drawings show your current and proposed futur facility. L=' I visited your current facility on the afternoon o i 29 July 1997 to observe the existing conditions in and around your plant. I found . •t noise levels were fairly low for a manufacturing plant. I discovered that you hav- two garage style doors on the south side of the building. One was closed with a pi . c table placed in front of it r,, indicating that it is probably closed most of the ' ..e. The other door was open to l the plant inside. There were compressors . .'.: at the time of my visit,but no metal work was being done. The exterior noise level 10 feet from the open garage door was 65 dBA. The average noise level at the private residences across Burnett I Street was only 51 dBA at the time of my visit. The fact that your facility is located very close to existing homes without noise comp:aints is certainly compelling testimony to your relatively quiet operations. I understand that your new facility will be located on the south side of 7th Street, RECEIVED just west of the intersection with Talbot Road South. This site is bounded on the south,west,and east with businesses. There are some single family residences AUG 2 5 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLAN CITY OF ReNTONING Regeoft eoc€ Sft'z(4t9 eoøtft4 , �p� MANUFACTURERS OF COIL SPRINGS AND WIRE FORMS - �"�tJ�7;2 5 1997 Specializing in Titanium applications DEVELOPMENT r�,y;v,�,,,`; 325 BURNETT AVE. NO. • P.O.BOX 880 • RENTON, WA 98057-0880 • (206) 255-1453 • (206)228-0780 f��fyOF ReNTUtt Conditional Use Request/Supporting Policy • Conditional Use Request The property is zoned Arterial Commercial (CA). The proposed use is Light Manufacturing. Under CA zoning, Section 5, "Hearing Examiner Conditional Uses", paragraph "y" reads as follows: "Light manufacturing, including assembly and warehousing of prefabricated parts and finished parts; also including minor finishing work as part of the assembly process." We are, therefore, required to go before the hearing examiner. • Reasons to Support Light Manufacturing 1. Site The site does not have direct arterial access. Thus, it does not meet normal retail development market trends. 2. Existing Buildings The existing buildings are not suitable for retail type use. The existing buildings are substantial, and in good condition. This makes removal of existing buildings and redevelopment of the site unfeasible. • Supporting City of Renton Policy The following supporting policy statements are taken from the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Manual. • From the glossary, Light Industrial is defined: "a type of land use including small scale or less intensive production, manufacturing, distribution or fabricating activities. Some office activities and supporting convenience_retail activities may also be included." Comment: RCS's manufacturing business fits this definition. • "Objective LU-C: Maintain a high ratio of jobs to housing in Renton." Comment: RCS presently has 53 employees, and those employees feed 170 people. There is a 1:3 ratio of employees to service sector jobs. RCS assists the city presently in meeting the above objective & policy. As RCS grows to over 100 employees, that support will only improve. • "Objective LU-W: Promote diversity and stability in the employment base." ■ "Policy LU-144. The City should endeavor to keep its present economic base, including the heavy industrial development, light and medium industrial users, supporting commercial and office land uses." ■ "Policy LU-145. The City should provide incentives including adequate land supply and land use guidance for new businesses and for existing businesses relocating within the City." ■ "Policy LU-146. Adequate amounts of land suitable for all types of industrial, light industrial, office and commercial uses should be available for present and future development. Using the growth assumptions, criteria for determining "adequate amounts of land" for the employment area should be based on the following. ■ (in part) d. Light industrial: Sustain the amount of existing uses and provide for a modest future expansion of light industrial development." Comment: first, by definition, "Light Manufacturing" is the same as "Light Industrial". ,The above policies indicate the city should be encouraging RCS in their goal to relocate, grow and prosper to the benefit of the City of Renton. • "Objective LU-X: Make efficient use of infrastructure." ■ "Policy LU-149. Employment area designations should each have a primary emphasis but allow a range of allowable secondary uses." ■ "Policy LU-151. Sites and structures should be designed (e.g. signage and facades; building height, bulk setback; landscaping; parking; storage and delivery areas) to mitigate adverse impacts on adjacent less intensive land uses." ■ "Policy LU-153. Adequate infrastructure (e.g. roads, utilities, public services) should be in place prior to occupancy." Comment: Policy LU-149 suggests the city should allow a range of secondary uses. As per Policy LU-151, RCS will be designed to mitigate adverse impacts as stated. And per Policy LU-153, adequate infrastructure is now in place for the intended RCS use. (See attached utilities & street maps.) • Site Design ■ "Policy LU-160. Developments should provide appropriate treatment (e.g. landscaping, improved building façade) along major arterials to mitigate adverse visual impacts. Comment: The RCS site is zoned (CA) Arterial Commercial, which implies the site fronts on the Grady Way arterial. Although currently the site does not front on Grady Way, RCS will provide appropriate landscape treatment along both, Talbot Road and 7th Street. • Light Industry ■ "Objective LU-Z: Promote the development of light industries in suitable locations. ■ "Policy LU-164. Light industrial uses which are allowed should be less intensive in order to maintain compatibility with adjacent uses." ■ "Policy LU-165. Light industrial uses should not create noxious conditions such as noise, odors, or traffic which could detract from the office uses allowed in this category." ■ "Policy LU-166. Light industry should be an allowed secondary use in Employment Area designations." ■ "Policy LU-167. Light industrial uses should be allowed as secondary uses in Neighborhood, Suburban, Downtown, and Office/Residential centers." Comment: Policy LU-164 & Policy LU-165 caution against certain impacts. The RCS manufacturing operation is quiet and clean, and does not create such negative conditions. Policy LU-166 & Policy LU-167 suggest the City of Renton should allow RCS to operate in the new location, as is requested. • Stormwater ■ "Objective EN-F: Conduct a stormwater management program which optimizes Renton's water resources." ■ "Policy EN-27. Control quantity and quality of stormwater run-off from all new development to be consistent with or improved over existing conditions." ■ "Policy EN-28. Minimize on-site erosion and sedimentation during and after construction." ■ "Policy EN-30. Industries and businesses should use best management practices to prevent erosion." Comment: RCS will comply with the above mentioned stormwater management requirements. •' "Objective EN-G: Provide a storm and surface water control and drainage system capable of preventing threats to life, property and public safety during a 100 year flooding event." • "Policy EN-36. Promote the return of precipitation to the soil at natural rates near where it falls through the.use of detention ponds, grassy swales, and infiltration where feasible." • "Policy EN-37. Promote development design which minimizes impermeable surface coverage by limiting site coverage and maximizing the exposure of natural surfaces." • "Policy EN-38. Manage the cumulative effects of storm water through a combination of engineering and preservation of natural systems." Comment: RCS will work with the City of Renton to assure compliance with all codes and ordinances. AUg-15-97 oZ :331..° Law UTT '1CeS csa3 cic poiv RECEIVED HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. AUG 2 5 1997 A Professional Service Corporation \/ELOPMENT PLANNI David L.Halinen,P.E. Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building 206)443-4684 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Fax(206)646-3467 Bellevue,Washington 98004 August 18, 1997 Mr. Fred Kaufman City of Renton Hearing Examiner 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Renton Coil Spring Company's Application for a Conditional Use Permit for Phased Development of the 2.8-Acre CA-Zoned Site Located at S. 7th Street and Talbot Road South REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL TIME DURATION WITHIN WHICH TO IMPLEMENT THE PROPOSED PHASED DEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. Examiner: I am writing on behalf of my client, Renton Coil Spring Company ("RCS"), in regard to its request for a conditional use permit. Pursuant to RMC 4-18-14E (copy attached), RCS hereby requests a ten-year period within which to secure a City of Renton building permit for the new building proposed on the site. That building is referred to as "Building 4" in the conditional use permit application package. This special request is made because RCS's forecasted business growth indicates the need for phased development of the site. (Phased development projects are a category of projects for which the last sentence of RMC 4-18-14E authorizes the Examiner to establish approval time frames that exceed that code section's ordinary time frames.) Specifically, RCS forecasts growth of its business over the next decade that corresponds to a need for Building 4 in about 7 years. The three existing buildings on the site, which RCS plans to immediately use following City approval, are anticipated to meet the company's building space needs up to that point in time. A ten-year conditional use permit period is requested for Building 4 because of the uncertainties of such long-term business forecasting (i.e., the building may prove to be needed a few years earlier or later). Thank you for your anticipated review of this request. Please let me know if you need additional information. Sincerely, HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. David L. Ha inen cc: Renton Coil Spring Company(via telecopier) Attn: Charles Pepka Roger Richert, AIA, Richert & Associates (via telecopier) D:\CF\2253\001\KAUFMAN.LT) Aug-18-97 02:33P Law Offices 4b3 4/4 Wts/o r-vo 4-8-14 4-8-14 4-8-14: EXAMINER'S DECISION AND last area land use analysis and area zoning; RECOMMENDATION; FINDINGS or REQUIRED: b. That the property is potentially A. Unless the time is extended pursuant to classified for the proposed zone being this Section, within fourteen (14) days of requested pursuant to the polices set forth the conclusion of a hearing, or the date set in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions for submission of additional information have been met which would indicate the pursuant to this Chapter, the Examiner change is appropriate; or shall render a written decision, including findings from the record and conclusions c. That since the last previous land therefrom, and shall transmit a copy of use analysis of the area zoning of the such decision by regular mail, postage subject property, authorized public prepaid, to the applicant and other parties improvements, permitted private of record in the case requesting notice of development or other circumstances the decision. The person mailing the affecting the subject property have decision, together with the supporting undergone significant and material change. documents, shall prepare an affidavit of mailing, in standard form, and the affidavit 2. If the Hearing Examiner further shall become a part of the record of the determines that the change of the zone proceedings. In the case of applications classification is advisable, in the public requiring City Council approval, the interest, tends to further the preservation Examiner shall file his decision with the and enjoyment of any substantial property City Council members individually at the rights of the petitioner, is not materially expiration of the appeal period for the detrimental to the public welfare or the decision. properties of other persons located in the vicinity thereof, and is in harmony with the B. In extraordinary cases, the time for filing of purposes and effect of the Comprehensive the recommendation or decision of the Plan, then in such event, the Hearing Examiner may be extended for not more Examiner may recommend that the City than thirty (30) days after the conclusion of Council approve the change of the zone the hearing if the Examiner finds that the classification. amount and nature of the evidence to be considered, or receipt of additional D. Conditions : The Examiner ' s information which cannot be made recommendation or decision may be to available within the normal decision period, grant or deny the application, or the requires the extension. Notice of the Examiner may require of the applicant such extension, stating the reasons therefor, conditions, modifications and restrictions as shall be forwarded to all parties of record in the Examiner finds necessary to make the the manner set forth in this Section for application compatible with its notification of the Examiner's decision. environment and carry out the objectives and goals of the Comprehensive Plan, the C. Change of Zone Classification (Rezone): zoning ordinance, the subdivision ordinance, the codes and ordinances of the 1. In any case where a change of the zone City of Renton, and the approved classification of property is recommended, preliminary plat, if applicable. Conditions, at least one of the following circumstances modifications and restrictions which may shall be found to apply: be imposed are, but are not limited to, additional set backs, screenings in the form a. That substantial evidence 'was of landscaping and fencing, covenants, • presented demonstrating the subject easements and dedications of additional reclassification appears not to have been road rights of way. Performance bonds may specifically considered at the time of the 493 City of Renton Aug-18-97 02:34P Law Offices 253 27Z 915I0 r.vd+ 1 4-8-14 4-8-16 be required to insure compliance with the additional information requested, whichever is conditions, modifications and restrictions. later. (Ord. 3454, 7-28-80) E. T ion : The City declares t a circumstances surrounding land use 4-8-16: APPEAL: Unless an ordinance decisions change rapidly over a period of providing for review of decision of the time. In order to assure the compatibility of Examiner requires review thereof by the a decision with current needs and concerns, Superior Court, any interested party aggrieved any such decision must be limited in by the Examiner's written decision or duration, unless the action or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal improvements authorized by the decision is to the City Clerk upon a form furnished by the implemented promptly. Any application or City Clerk, within. fourteen (14) calendar days permit approved pursuant to this Chapter from the date of the Examiner's written report. with the exception of rezones shall be The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a implemented within two (2) years of such fee in accordance with the fee schedule of the approval unless other time limits are City. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) prescribed elsewhere in the Renton Municipal Code. Any application or permit A. The written notice of appeal shall fully, which is not so 'implemented shall clearly and thoroughly specify the terminate at the conclusion of that period substantial error(s) in fact or law which of time and become null and void. The exist in the record of the proceedings from Examiner may grant one extension of time which the appellant seeks relief. Facsimile for a maximum of one year for good cause filing of a notice of appeal is authorized shown. The burden of justification shall pursuant to the conditions detailed in rest with the applicant. For large scale or Renton City Code Section 4-8-11C. (Ord. phased development projects, the Examiner 4353, 6-1-92) may at th time of approval or recommendation set forth time limits for B. Within five (5) days of receipt of the notice expiration which exceed those prescribed in of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all this Section for such extended time limits parties of record of the receipt of the as are justified by the record of the action. appeal. Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten (10) days of the dates of mailing of the _ 4-8-15: RECONSIDERATION: An y notification of the filing of the notice of interested person feeling that the appeal. decision of the Examiner is based on an erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error C. Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence members of the City Council all of the _ which could not be reasonably available at the pertinent documents, including the written prior hearing, may make a written application decision or recommendation, findings and for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) conclusions contained in the Examiner's days after the written decision of the Examiner report, the notice of appeal, and additional has been rendered. The application shall set letters submitted by the parties. (Ord. forth the specific errors relied upon by such 3658, 9-13-82) - appellant, and the Examiner may, after review . of the record, take further action as the D. No public hearing shall be held by the City Examiner deems proper. The Examiner may Council. No new or additional evidence or request further information which shall be testimony shall be accepted by the City provided within ten (10) days of the request. The Council unless a showing is made by the Examiner's written decision on the request for party offering the evidence that the consideration shall be transmitted to all parties evidence could not reasonably have been _ of record within ten (10) days of receipt of the available at the time of the hearing before application for reconsideration or receipt of the the Examiner. If the Council determines 493 • City of Renton • Reato ft e°ie Sfta€ ' MANUFACTURERS OF COIL SPRINGS AND WIRE FORMS Specializing in Titanium applications 325 BURNETT AVE. NO. • P.O.BOX 880 • RENTON, WA 98057-0880 • (206) 255-1453 • (206)228-0780 FAX 1 RECEIVrn Project Narrative AUG 25 1a 7 • Project Name DEVELOPMEN'i wu1�.+v+ivG CITY OF RENTON Renton Coil Spring Company (relocation) • Project Size &Location/Current Owners 2.8 acre site located at South 7th Street & Talbot Road South. The current owners are Castagno Brothers Inter Vivos Revocable Trust. The existing facilities were originally built for their trucking company. • Current Use LTS Trucking Company, warehouse storage, and Bryant Motors bus storage. • Proposed Use Renton Coil Spring Company's light manufacturing business. This would entail moving the present Renton Coil Spring Company's manufacturing plant from Burnett Ave. North to the existing buildings for their light manufacturing business. • Project Statistics • Zoning - Arterial Commercial (CA) • Site area - 2.8 acres • Access - from North, off South 7th Street (there is no direct access to the arterial - Grady Way) • Buildings (existing) • Building No. 1 (1954 construction) - east side Main floor = 10,933 SF Ir • Building No. 2 (1961 construction) -west side Main floor = 9,217 SF 2nd floor = 4,600 SF • sub-total = 13,817 SF 13,817 SF • Building No. 3 - northwest corner Main floor = 6.194 SF • Total existing floor area 30,944 SF 30,944 SF • Building No. 4 (future planned addition) Main floor = 16,500 SF • Total projected floor area 47,444 SF • Vicinity Map The attached vicinity map locates the subject property in relation to surrounding areas. • Project Site Plan/Landscaping Plan See attached site plan & landscaping plan. Access to the site is from South 7th Street across from Morris. An egress is shown on Talbot which will be a right turn only. The 4 buildings, which will be discussed, are shown. A revised parking arrangement is shown in the northeast part of the site. The landscape plan shows the landscape buffering and planting plan anticipated for the ultimate project. • Utility (storm/water/sewer) Maps/Level 1 Storm Drainage Analysis The attached vicinity map shows utilities available to the subject property. Enclosed is a level 1 analysis of storm drainage. • Renton Coil Spring Company Background/History Renton Coil Spring Company (RCS) has been in operation in the Renton community for the past 48 years. RCS is the recognized world leader in their field of • manufacturing titanium springs for high technology customers. 'Cold Forming" or "Cold Formability" of materials at RCS is one of the most important factors in production. This means there is no heat treating at 1400 degrees. It is a cold forming process. RCS's rate of growth in the last year exceeded 40%. This rapid growth required the addition of 12 new staff/employment positions. RCS now employs 53 people at its Burnett Ave. North location. See attached RentonCoil Spring Company progress report and technical paper entitled "Cold Forming of Titanium Rounds and Flats" by Charles Pepka. • Goals of Renton Coil Spring Company • Relocation to'a new business location, within the City of Renton, which will meet the present Renton Coil Spring Company's operational needs; and allow for future growth and expansion. • To grow to over 100 employees over the next seven years, thus adding more jobs to the local economy. • To continue to be successful in business, and maintain world leadership in their industry. • And, to continue to be a good neighbor in the City of Renton for another 48 years of operation. • Objectives of Renton Coil Spring Company • Obtain approval from City of Renton for"light manufacturing" use at said location. • Close on land purchase option to purchase 2.8 acres at 434 SW 7th Street in Renton. • Move Renton Coil Spring Company operation to the new location, in order to gain much needed additional floor space to meet the present needs of RCS. (The lack of adequate floor space at the present location is RCS's largest current operational constraint.) • Operate from this new site, which gives quick and easy access to arterials while maintaining a close proximity to residential neighborhoods (as some employees now enjoy the option of living within walking distance of work). • Changes Proposed/Required at Subject Site 1. Obtain conditional use approval from City of Renton. 2. Arrange for moving of existing tenants. 3. Obtain engineering/input/design for: • Storm drainage & related civil issues • Landscaping considerations • Structural upgrades • Life safety issues related to ingress/egress, building sprinklers system, etc. • HVAC requirements for new light manufacturing needs including heating, lighting, electrical, compressed air, etc. 4. Make improvements as soon as possible, to allow as smooth a transition as possible for RCS. The highest priority would be to prepare the manufacturing space (Building No. 1) first. Manufacturing is the most critical need. 5. Existing trucking company equipment &trailers The next phase would be to move these tenants, and complete improvements needed (Building No. 2) to occupy the entire building. This would include: • Landscaping • Paving for parking & driveways • • Site improvements • Exterior building clean-up, painting, and architectural enhancements. These improvements will dramatically enhance the project site with less noise, dust, and truck movements as is found with the existing use. 6. Building No. 3 (northwest corner) Submit plans for remodel of the building located in the northwest corner (Building No. 3). This building will be used for manufacturing and/or inventory storage. It will need a new architectural front design to replace the existing doors, and a new concrete floor slab. Being at the entry to the site, this building will need to be treated to best enhance the sight and entry area. 7. Building No. 4 (future planned addition) Submit plans for constructing a 4th building to be used for light manufacturing. The size would be approximately 16,500 SF with a 17-foot clear interior height. The purpose of this space is for future growth of the Renton Coil Spring Company, and is expected to be accomplished within 7 years. By having the ability to make this expansion, RCS gains a long-term home. • • Structural Integrity of Existing Buildings The enclosed structural report shows that the existing structures are stable, and in good condition. There is no apparent deterioration due to settlement, or lack of maintenance. As would be expected, certain upgrading of structural systems will need to be made to meet present codes. The existing building are valuable improvements to the site. When considering the future use of the site, the economic factors of these improvements are critical. • Architectural Enhancement Considerations See photos enclosed of the existing north elevations of Buildings No. 1 & No. 2. Also, see drawing of existing exterior elevations and notes of design intent. Renton Coil Springs Company desires to continue to put the very best possible image forth in the Renton community. In addition to interior tenant improvements, which will meet the needs of RCS's present operation and anticipated future growth, exterior architectural enhancements to the existing buildings are anticipated. Considerations being given study include: • Exterior cleaning/building maintenance • Exterior painting/graphics/color • Architectural infills to the entire front of Building No. 3, and to portions of Building No. 2, with the addition of aesthetically pleasing infill walls &windows. • Awnings over 2nd story windows. • Addition of windows and/or"greenhouse" skywall window openings. • Architectural definition of main entrance to building with the addition of a structure covering this entrance to the facility. • Finally, the addition of trees and planting will screen and improve the exterior environment & enhance the architectural effect. All of the above design considerations will focus on softening the existing building's exterior architecture to more reflect the new light manufacturing activity, which is less intensive than the present use. The architectural enhancements would be designed to better blend with the multi-family zoning found to the north, than does the existing. ♦ Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) It is the intent of RCS to study the needs of ADA, and upgrade the buildings to meet those requirements. This would include (but, not be limited to) physical accessibility issues, such as 2nd floor access and rest room access. An elevator to the 2nd floor office space is one consideration, along with revised restroom layouts. Thank You From the Employees of Renton Coil Spring Company • • • . . . . . . ' __7_____7.....m,............................... •. , . '..,- .. . •. ' - . . . . • .."-- -, .. • . . ... .' ' ' ....'..•.-. .' ' • ••• ''..• • ' •T • ,, . -. i.: . •1_ __[ ... ,:..-.•.•'•.,..'-:-• . ...,1,-V l\-,i_A',.•1..,..•-_•.•...„'._-,.-0.L_.,_3__8_ C.C-/-7V U•.°.t-•c'-1\1.iso__Ps_-A_c_-..Cc Isr1..Fw./.4L,...:.-.....'gR-,T„I rA„".-r-...T 0 j.S.tf.r-•I--.az---S.Z o--A.C6-t--O-.]:.'--'•-‘A4„`,•'1.„.'„',(:.0b6.,0 *!•.•."_._.._4_M--I1.-•,,",so.-:---_2-Ya•°`lc`:'';.6.'...)11897g. ,s1 E Ea.•ll iat•.• r.L.-.,,k.,..: ':--v_•4- 0.-ZITR._A-i:,•i1.i.-._.:•-,,,43s1k-4A .222 6 1•• ,"'••...r etE-9ff,SE4",i-*-3'-I'1I r-222 41.----M.m.'n,O,,i•l--s,•-,• 40 7a-z- r`niz4sN,......i w.•--E'aLv 2-.2---1.-_8r,1._:17,I,,•1 -TC_tlir_ke-s•r t--(.t 11•:. aMg r 4 1 . 6. - ' L-6 a,,•,,i LnI,;2v.l_;,1 WE42A•rilil4.alaia18•.Eiin r•_ 20 • i - • DO 191 . ig Ie E ' a. .i-i-:i•A.:•e) k,4Fckr•rtc..1M , MW 4 0a (8i o 18 go k 18 ( Y 6 i ...3),•,) • . . .:*::..'.1"•.-.•.....•.'.4'•i..i•:f% 16:'7 I•...• ..' :•.:.. 15 '01 • rn • iff f•.--'',4.1...-4-4-cli1CA15` 2\69_ • pi Cl.,., . :1:1c.1, A 7:111-' q„„ I runI..... • „mpg 14.03 k .50 1/4.)_, H. 0 , •-..,, - 61,M,;8 ! 11 113]. teu to i Foam , , I Lit to , -of '#) s T L'•49 31' ,°,1 . CA;j7 , - SEI 7 14 tar ts nor ' lit. 6 stg ' l' . 715i--- . 16 W, . EiF4-1 i6-- 21, ' Iff4,w 7 i oN, .13Er a. L- -.-......J11. .. 4'-• Atu \ "S"' t / Rata ..'N . gil le' 15 El • Ck • WTI ..is 5rm- I"" 00-111 • •ER 1...,------6- • I to . '. - FB 8 13 no, 8 r q, :•1 1, :• .-‘ 7:.1.137 NK ___ _7, 45,6/.'\ \ ..14 i..., RES. 8 i gm • 1; 14 59, QP„t„ -II 14 rah ra„A • .4E1 9 , as , 9 12 ) - cy% 14 t re 3S •- i______. •'I.r ..•.....- \ co QT. j ER IFI, V) V50241 1 CI .-,..2 ., ..,-.- ,m1 12 13 aplj4 "mt. v. LA:, 12 ! DM (J) (441, 12. ,Wa 40 , 534t !It 401:1 10 ; ;X go $-I Ig. ../ 6, D:9 VrikS?", 111:10 , 535 : • •••• -* ST R Kit', LAk. % z • \ _z/./sim i • L.• • ize • a / \ c,"' 0 \3.1C Ac.- zz.zso s'i' 're,Ito A • ''''' S . 6TH 57: - . ,. , 7:,.,,, ne ' _ g: • .,..... , ;u.sf Ex-14 AA 6 . ...• ... ... ... ... .... , .i 1i AI: \ . ' ITZ ito a: ... , • 2. -3, ri 0. . . ,. .: Ale .•. ... ... ..,.5-TRAM pi. .. 6E14 ?raw I 0 201----LTI:1--cr 21 }.fg Rh r&-". 1 ' • 20"°al flit.4; 1.L.202 . ,rosy ; ' L A NES •• - /-9-;+.g 7 .. 12:11.-/-Wr.M1--- •' - 121 ckS)kv 0 ,t ., ... ,1/NG EVE20 ____, : (4,31)1.4! If .., • 20 IDE , \ . .p. , 3 , 2 ...A 4 WILLIAMS.., CIS,) 8 (e.), ' ,....._ , 7.L.C6 1-e.68 rLdS • *0° 3 11 ". 10• • 743. ---1 . 20 0 is - .• A COND. 30 Z4Fairs • 1,.., r,%t. S 1/ 1,,, _del I 1122ill 0.41 Ac. ."- .--a.--15. Li lik 0 Al, 19 • s ei t'' ._f„M•17. i A 18 0 • .. 1 • 28,,s fri ,,,,,, , ,... i . ,.. _.....i. . ... i .. . . . P A ii IN I N 6 2. ••. 4$ •6° 1.s' . 17 . " • •.-qq urn \„71./23 <5 , Or (12 5 -,64--.5.;ip 112 s, --16- -- 65 . Ci• .F02 4 0.9 5 AC. 1•15- -.1 e- .% ,.. U/77 „ -.k1 rt./34[7:1.og• \)\ I , :..,., KELLER & ...k \ 66 Ts. ten 0 cb• i.P1't it 7 __ __Eli 4.4 3 6 15 RI • / • 5' - o .... . r f.23 Ir.6. ar , s2.3 . ',... .. I.. - r* Aq.,,C' --- 1 • .... C,URRAN fit i • MR 7 14 (RI . 40 t r• 6° 1.0 0 1::.: HAY C%)ANERSON 0. fic. ex go 20 [ 103 8 j ,- ,,T?, 4 . 14 X.1.-f? 'PI i .0 .,‘,91 , i,s, 0.Z 3 Ac. 2 l:•:1 ''.• I /1 .1...i. t • r.1.8 8 I 13 Cal• b....:1 It. LtAANc' \7?. CP ' •••1 1..• Er,' 1 / 1 i q.4.......- ' St 9 1 • r1.44 ,cp),i, i 1; 181 t) -_r_.3 IV.-• ..i ':1 Mg mi 0 .4) b I (. Lc, 1 "( • , ., Govt tick,: 0.6 I A c. 63p/ •i, .14 :1,127°3-' ---6,,,-..1.0_1...-1 1 9 639 i • r/.//f 1\7 A\ - 1 4:k__________ ", 6.•.• e; ,,.: .... • I I . c• 1 •o• I 1.55 Ac. 1 7.4 i34 -1=a .7.0 .. illikitjkFrill v sty:161 qiiiya: ELU 43"-Y.. 60 ' I 1'47 0 1 20) CFC•••70 •jitta...v...1. . • .... .-'';' ,- - .8 / .ZR-. Z.L.'..'• .:.. ;•:-: I".• [ .4........„..i_.,.________I_____-.--;.j;•-7---•-••.--•7TH '4 2-....,1.Z.- 4,.......h. _ .6,....;-•cis -,. Pu6E r .50up0'...4.2. i . . 2:14-..4.r 1 2S . ....- .... .. . I:.•.' r.'1 • --6 T:,------:pr----(TK • -"--- -6 ...- . i"„12,4.4 ..s. ‘ ,... . ' ': 2s.17'.1'''.. • ----4--- r -•-• •- r iii-.i.;•- .. T--- 22410 Iss.3 /43.27 /37 ' i.• ••I.104 i At nagn IV\ ‘ SC Fr pr I por . •a ..... ;op) t - . -. Cri • .2, ) 1 1::.-'I 1::,1 •:-. 1 11 1 • 0..• • A c• ' 1' r L39, .r. \ .L..2-____../_ /-',, 23. 2 /1 *, i re ,O •.1 .... • cl 41' ___I_____;:ce ,... . 1 .. .2 . '-. -,••• , ' l':' / ,-. i r -. ...--.e. I 0 ,• - - --- • r ---- s .Li'--,10-0difiro./„.flei . 72c, V •• 1-? ' ., 1 • / .. I. ! ••': .... - •• -P.! • 1...---:' . ' •• 1:•* ol cc • *, IMP -- ,• .7 -. t / --- •(). 1 .,...-,to-/4- Z50 U.J e • n, Fr ../ .i, v '4 14.1 4 -• ,'-ri/.1. .r.,,,,,'''•*:,) 1.2 i ,`,•• ...2 re-12 izo F /60 ___7_...•• z T.L.6 , 'AG• . : 05.1N' ' t?` • . - - z "F /20 5 . I • - , I 'f;.- :1 .. ....: 1:::1 . is .`• i 05 >- • '''."•, /.• • I I b% VICTOR lc V) Lii J.E.BANKER .,- 6 -• . - f:•:: :(•••,..7 GIL .A ci. 1.•i I:.:. •,c ; :.:•••"/ ' ' '' I, i _.. I I a DIAMBR1 ..cc D N. 1.75 Ac. • .,- co' • -k- I 1 I - , c, N./. , , - • • . ' •'. ! !:... .7. .•''.'`.. il - . REIllON CONC.RrE 1 E. ,.... L.) lli , 3.06 Ac. /..25.' ' - g. k /.,' ,.." \ B..* J q." I. 8 II i ''' I••:, t:7 ,.•.,• -) • * 1 i • -,•55 / 1 i cc Lr' ...-' I :•./ ..:, '• 0,3 Ac. us cc ..4- • -1 • -\ 9 k 114 r 9 1'. • - P. 5. P. 8, L. CO. / //.•../ .„ r L..3I Z LIJ • • 1:1-." \141)' i I.:. )::- 1 ."; 1 I.A1 en 1 1., los) rt I 10 it ' 7.'40 Ac 7-...• '%9 40i.7 , 0C 5.P•'' ' . I-1 --------. . \ 11136(11: __Av.. 11 CY 1 . ....... , 7..../..32 . ------V-------... ........_....... ‘VIC `,--i‘• 21 • VAE1114 . • . . 4/6.46./%., ..1•0 _ .... .ly 14°W: • „ • - 5u1:10 14(.101'1 y --%1 _1 , •,, r• 04/1 los 1 . nq. k ...• ,D.,!--.,.. ,', i 2.16t s I -, (.::::0. ...„---‘,.; G R4° - II . _......_ .. (2) of *I r'''' \o-A-T - , ,- _____I f____ 41N 0. f( S' - . or SWITCHING 5U776Ar -. . a • 1 6\i : \. r 1 1 , ) 1 F-- • ,,, .--••••-- i •'" 0 500.. -- • .-.'-- -. L I I 1 I _. i . z 2. ,---- --\..; --4--ic-• \-- 1 I 1 i ‘ I 1 I _.------- ____.----• : 1IN ._ _ I ..i / / , -- I I • f• SCALE 1' = 200' ,--,t.)GET SOUND POWER N ,. ' irr.ol 1 1 It 1 6" /....i 1 ! I 1 1 : z i UGHT CO I . ...-••-"‘:.:.---_,..--ir '5 , 1•-- I to '4"! I ,i VICINITY MAP - - NDGhDORhOOD DETA 1 1 .. ...- ‘ . f---:-... •• II , -1 515.11 S.(/.4.7 S_E...1..:1..:?''):[... _ •'• 1.'. --•- ::a 1 1 . . • :..r 9201.42(G24) 9GO26 VA IMAM 0800 LGO66 VA NO1N3r1 6602G x00 T.YJ LW=1CW 75 WOO .ONI �S�.iv 9Occv aNn ci Nd1� aus ),Ndcl�10� SONI LIS 1I• 09 NO.L i E h h�,h h € i 1 i i 1 - s t ! IIIIII gF g 1 f ' . RF I = 611 1 li 111 dill di/ . 1 1 '' e4 llgolg .1 MV lig; 1 i! i ItiD !vial . 1.1 i 1 i tg-i ? i 8 : . ,n, 9iiii0 • p II • I • • i ; • `� .•• , ,. "TALBOT RD 5. ��.� ,,,.:;; *S i\V f ; liv r� • r• • 1 ♦NN n� reel I • Atat4 e 10 n4 1 JI s' #4, ,,, a .. —,lax-- I ‘,‘ \ _• , e a — 11 ' rill, 21 ; li % \ , 211 . , 1 1 1,24 c-5. 1 • \ ___ _____ _____ 1 3. .1. ,_ I .. 4 J L., .,. ''''. 71 \ ti is-777 /11P ' \‘' ' ...T .. . r ---cii F—Tirrirri '\ Z if S gI\V r a a s ` • Sl>Now 9 I q E- ire • _o:_.., , 1 L.1_1+_ 3 _,.._._...._c__ Is 4"/ 1§ \ r- --, - ... ."S• 1 1 nI I ., — g §1 . -? il I 1 l ' ge. i ,÷-1 ---- li 1;1- ..., /. 1 %.\\., E 18P 1 ]) ili; 11 4 1/4) 1 .k.:1-13—§ t // /cZ, (4 • I, , , , „3 ,,, . -1_- _ _3612"_ -fir I- - - � _ _ _cil \ I-¢I � --�--.. < 9 P i! I • , I tni I ( ED�PALETTE) tri I �� (f l W I ° STREET-ME M AGER RI IBRUI'�SCARLET sera t..azor 5tA Z.PIRE HYDRANT H 1 W . TRIAGANT1105 '0 RIAI.', • (Id � „olio QUERUJr GOGGN:A tri 21 U-1 I � , - CONIFER TREES W g • I FN15 CONTORT& PN)S SYLVESTRIS,TI•IJdA PLIGATA k-- I __.k I ° SOUTH 7TH STREET L__-----1 _ s O g sk 0 4, rue-0 me. SPIRAFJI ELVALDA.BARBERIS - coo e112 or me - - - - ® - - - - - M - - - 6cJ JAPaJIGIv Dnv sPP. P�RIS s�yF 1..._.......... ...._._.... / , ORM IIIK 1 loconoOlgre--. 17, i Mr 50•••••-•.-1 a� -� q---v� pgiX --j GROUND COVER L a e7tz�-v T....._ • z ° ao /���^ !t����io •-, I � ; • ` � ' ° r � ° � ` TERHINALIS ARGIITOSTAPHYL05 UVAUR51 •• BUILDING N. �'� i.�'� =. 'L'►" f; p = -! ;I • 3 a EOM ,O�rECM ®,:mc I`a ' ; ! 7 - FLOWERING TREES ® ® ,N • )o O . OA GORM.15 KOUSA,rvtws FL.ORIELMA,AGER PAutivruli. ACM � _ max.,.. • ►' GIRGINATUfi. LERGIS GnNA cane run / .°/y�I�1� �'�i C �- / V DEN55I5 Leeart ea rri / .. — If°/ °gin' �'�'100 1 1 � '. 4 e:i >'� D i - . ^./ -%J: �■ - ; NATURALIZEDPERB�h11AL5 erEl w+olea "i �°�AirFi:.i_ni ti: -' ' •° ; ;: \ ; . HOSTA, TULO'S, DAFFODILS, I- RpG(LI-15 \1 -11% ^ fin r. o.o ,�� 1 * :Eei�afZ1 G��*,°��'9 ft J�t J I P� S Al it-�� _ ;% r_,�/ `'`. J FLAWING AREA ANALY5I a;' %sir'L`��. .. I o BOOMY `• ` PARKNG 15t Aim PLANTER AREA 4,�i70 5F AUTOMOTNE - 4_j I _ �►' ?, • ,: • . `�,�., . a��IL�ra�'/��t \ \ OTHER ONSITE PLANTING AREA IG,E%5F C. I`IOVER5 ° I �.���i' �� o ^,. _p _ oo'? ' ; TOTAL.arm PLANTING AREA 20,726 5F �_ '=) �. �- PAVEMENT AREAS Z. o - DRIVE, PARKING, IlANUVERING 38,9(90 5F F o,>r o, ` a P RK , n , M1MaulC[NM �, � . I = ,.. ..,. - :• FIRE LANE 132U0 5r- - _1 FETAL WM% . a / '� ��� �-_� 40 o°O;'=� ; \ •. CONCRETE WALKS 2230 5F Mr4 rfl BLDG►`12 I / I BUILDING K I q.0� y .�- Hod. r> o ,, ' _ �, I I cane m,.wG Lee Leer a . . �' ice ixrror OF ��(( nvtr�erwG Asa xi rta Q ����•�• o �a \,`, CLAW PLANTF-RS(4,470 5F)/PARKING ARi A(35.960 5F) ' gr.:PAL A%AZ7 1 I pane2tal3. RQOR I o� .• v��,, rmorte MIT ,\C�'. \\ :,`` lb L ___:-.- ; . I / \y °jI o-c; LO°�kO`�"` \\ \ \ss TOTAL oror(B PLANT AREA(20,706 5F)/TOTAL SITE ( 5F) 17 N °� 12L830 0 car I 41, o� a .0:/l0 �• _-cat Y ROPOSED\ • Z I l- BUILDING N. 4 !•t �. o o00: . AMA Ofi900 9pRJ • \ `� `' �EGENp o • V FUTURE BUILDPG SITE o a - .•• �p'; • POLE HOIA.ITED Liam%FIXTURE • TO BE SEEDED TO LAWN o . la?' . in • NV r1AINTAN D A5 SUCH r. i,i" O . UNTIL THE TIME OF I E: 4 , '' o> ricrac TABLE Z CONSTRUCTION ��r \ °-' °�o°.= 0 BICYCLE RACK () D a. ° ra\ 010 F� WOOD BENCH / o "may .pow.. .,dll MIL. n CATCH BASIN 1 00o,- ors 1 ROT I o 4 o f _== ECOLOGY BLOCK WALL n poOG Ao NMI ,,,0 �' G o0" P 'o°r°:'' SCALE I" G4' - • FIRE HYDRANT 0< - II i ''4 Ito ay s w +. o k-- - oo"f' '' -_ UTILITY POLE z W ZI AUGUST 1997 / • - H p�ETAL SCREEN FENCE 6'HT. i ._ - PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF „a, z 6Y SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. CITY OF MENTOR, STATE OF WASHINGTON - . N I I. I I X FIRE HYDRANT 1 Q NEW WATER Q FOUND CONC MOW W/ r RIM EL=27.60 WATER CnON WV Qs2i10=24-CMP E&W If.4.) MAIN NECnON JO' (nJo. Iaos'scumOFuNETtiCONNECT MID EXTEND STORM •HARDIE AVE S&S 7M ST DRAIN TD PROPOSED SITE I RAM EL-28.14N 1/4 COR 19-2J-5 INV EL••27.34'6"E , �I (7��NE COR SEC 19-23-51 flP GRAPHIC SCALE FOUND 7/8'P/N P/COW JD• RIM EL e 27.51 .- a, ti - " FOND CONE MOH. W/ « • a = s o, - - JO' 64967' PER OE79 �I BRASS TACK IN LEAD m �s oar W CASE(7/J7) ;max W OF NE Wr EL-26�66=6'W Amy, 1 - W CASE(7/97) am an la mos lance CCR 19-2J-5 I w(�i�y� _ qy Aram/ wane ii, ,� 2eirI SOUTH 7th STREET allo v a Sf METRO 108'SEER UNE — ';.-----' -- j 7A 8--- I - • 1 1 yp� SURVEY NOTE: _ N 89<2' W (BASIS OF BEARAYGL ?66LSd' M£AS) —- _ D -. - INSTRUMENT: NIKON TOTAL STATION D7M-A10LG q -�-- —�- ,44292' �t aw :::, (5 SECOND INSTRUMENT). METHOD USED: FIELD TRAVERSE NM ACTUAL 3 h R :" — --24'W F7EWD MEASUREMENTS AND ANGLES I U G� ;o C--�•—C , :- C�•� C G C 0 G ~• :,:.1..4.0---.4../ WAC 332-130-070 4i y .._ A :1_ _ T' - n.a ��• , �•� -Pli DATE OF SURVEY .RJCY 1997 Z1 me -.-- r er _ ^��.. i,M,.-4��� ®h_�N •I �...i, 43ir 'L'; "' ¢""• _ .— _. .a a: �n BA5J5 BEARING: NORTH UNE OF THE NE 1/4 o• ` �-' 63.80 V' z7 u. EX C8 '•'' /i/i/ll/ R ? r \ r b ryx SEC 19-23-5 (N 89 42 36 NO W i RIM• EL>T7.96' - } `I a BENCHMARK: C7TY OF RENT'ON MON P920; 3'BRASS DISK 2 '" W�V g�L 256F-6'W 1 ,. a 3 1 RM EL -2 � ./ v STAMPED -KING COUNTY SURVEY MONUMNET EN-61 1973' j L1Z/WATER SEP. «Q �', p A — 98 58'O•'' IN SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF RAINIER AVE S. LOCATED BUILD _ �• j aaini* EX C8 r, NORTH SIDE OF SOUTHERLY DRWY AT 604 RAINER AVE S. Q ' A. • _ 2 K = 3U O -H 3 a h bi ELEVATIC7oJ s 27.8Y (8.49M) �Lg9 NEW C8 :_�_., L - 17.63' RIM EL s 27.33 nay I - I WAIL WATER - -. -.. at i t ..,t-iol WV EL 26.80'-6'N£d5M' '\ - INV EL a 28.33-¢'N am IL SEPARATOR - .. NEW •ON fd0� • Sou NOTE 0 . I r .a �r''• T*a� au GS I r4r EX SS MR y'` ANY UNDERGROUND UTKf AES SHORN HEREON ARE BASED SOLELY I� I.. ,L I prOku:O. U)G 1 ° H ' ■� CS N O7:3O' 7- E ; I UPON lNPON MA7ICN FRONDED BY 0771£R£S 1DUA/A FJ�raxmzs y :' aE 1T.) � m■,•• r t7. T , , WV Q-21.33'-8'NdS 5 DOES NOT ACCEPT RtS"OVSIBIUTY OR ASSUME LIA&U7Y FOR *- -- • . 1i' ■. l 1* I. THEIR ACCURACY OF COMPLE7DIESS. � t P, is aa1�1 \_ p a 34D633' la WV EL 82=6'f �. 1. J I wj• a Gix��14 K 250!�9- ��"�RF; Q-A C 1W• • I f 9B. LEGEND (EXIST.) %/f// r Tir f o'0T I �� .` `•\ a, I 82.5• NEW FH ' as I m EX SS IH . 63 DECDVOUS TREE * / / I Cmo O o IX CATCH BASIN nP£1 o , m s ,; i ` 0 IX CA7O'1 BASH TYPE 2 CONFER TREE CZ x I B,pY" %i'n WwAt I I o :� roi0 a mtaw A . ,3 \ B WATER VALVE C) NET,DE ?N Fj• / r , ! ��mm��■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 'g a■■w■ t_ ., .. O ARE HYDRANT o UTAJJYPOf.E ) 3 j NETr.: _ N cB ����1 DOcw * HA. • �1p ' ,,,° WATER METER . - o MAIL pox 14-1 Sp ' s MSC N.7r.. PI: VAULT -/ .. i T WATER Bt0 OFF.. H1!_�.. 70L� � �:� s ev; lJl m TELEPHONE CABNAIE Ci�Q ROL7CERY I�. '14'4,4 ' i 1 „ /.' , ee lQ o ® CABLE TV CABNATE G MON W CASE • •1 I -- . 42► 8 •�D ,•� . .14 GI CAS VALVE v SURFACE BRASS MONUMENT L ' - k Lu :, / N.2 ' f I BUILDING N. I 9. �• ,�MOMas J+ • ® IELEPHQV£MANHOLE • FOvrvc.RIDAR db CAP 4 �q m c,'r 8 s .1.6 a s i �O U VAULT POWER OF IRON PIPE' O t\ CAJIW• • ler I - - I ,` 1() , r ROGc use -•, CORRECT AND DC77HG Eu.ota;Rd7GG@AAlN I7P. •'y¢ty A/H \� ® MONITORING*ELL. tO r7 Tt°1A'AG41RG Lf.7l/SKATE 1a N N.00R RM . v 31.88 ,`',w \�^ Q'. PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON POLE n • tSj V• r'r.> SYS7E�. / /` WV Q 21.98'-8'N&S k° a �l e y6e olreaLA cao 7i�n� G \ +� TWO POST SRN CD L• v • i / \ aI g,�� g� e.' TRAFFIC uuxcnov Box L:� . /////// /ii/!/i/i Viiiiiiii,iii,ii ,i fi I EXISTING ECOLOGY • \ f 3 �D0 X.* BLOCK WALL • _ Vh LEGEND NEW U TILI TIES) _ ,.Sv R, - PROPO i� �' ! NEW STORM DRAIN (I) BUILDING N AI W FH ■ NEW CATCH BASIN Ui \LiiRf tfW.l'NG71.RlG elf MCC", NEW CO �. r:mi ti NEW WATER MAIN n (Gm)70R) \ .., c O..COI 'N NEW SIDEWALK NEW FH• 21'T 4'$O- r•' / - 'e\ t.Dy. e' R = 1382.42' v\ Qr Mr . +: L = 572.65' 1 '` _ . ?, ` LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lv m _ 2 0-B _ THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST O'SHE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19, TOWNS7IIP 23 NORD,. - �'�$�_: - RANGE 5 EAST. NILLAAIETIE MERIDIAN.IN KING COUNTY, WASNWCTOI4 DESCRIBED AS FCU.OW&` - - r-- p�Y E "10 - - -- --- - - - - - - NORTH UREA nHT THE N A DISTANCE of 77ORTHEAST CORka.C1�SAID SUBDIVISION AND RUIINNO IlIENCE REST ALONG THE 2 5.23 FEET: • • . ' 61,,- • . THENCE SOUTH JO FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING 0 F THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED: THENCE MIST ALONG A UNE JO FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NOR UNE SUBCVNSON A _ THENCE&STO CE'SCUM / 238 ALONG GT TO TNE'T LINEST UNE DISTANCE IRE ON 565 FEET,T OR MORE ORAID LESS 7D THE A79 MQ T1D-CV7-9n Cis.EN.' - -/ �% NOR 7HMESTERLYY MARGIN OF THE NORTHERN PACFTC �Y COAPNY RIGHTO Tb THE _ WINCE NpNWWEAS7ERLY ALONG SAID NOR7HNESTERLY MARGIN 70 THE INk,,Yc,fONI OF SAID LINE THIN ACRAW OT Z-(O'019 ' . - UNE WHICH IS JD FEET SCYJWI OFF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LANE O'SAID SUBDH49AW, .,- THENCE*EST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE CF 2754 FEET,MORE OR LESS, 70 771E TRUE PONT wrt C7wA: OF BECWNAN0 Ql-IID haft ' EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY UNE O.THAT CERTAIN TRACT DAIF .HAY 7997 --- CONVEYED TO THE CJTY O'RENTO.N UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7604.300800. Ors Ha 72 SIT. ClDwG or 1 sons • • • 5318 SE 1/4 ..-. -4E8-19 y a,�; t14G8 y3; I•}74GB-2 j 14HB-5% .t { ISNB-1 < .... 16F '••): '.4rs8_,i .. 1 -,�:N,..L...•:• 361':14,�.JSt- , - ...> 7C B- 1 16FB�7 •.{ t 6Fe-9:#J ,.•+......,..'^ •.....:...........,� Ir...-- ....- 34HB-2 ... i "'"-'1-- /~ ',,v ']4EB-1 s= T lJ 16F9_!. 74G!!5 J j ..... ,;•: I N 3 r. 4i1618-8 c.- w-. o OF RENTON 16FB-16' _ 6FB_5+{ ` ..y rifr g SURFACE WATER • L f t74B_ a ,• DRAINAGE 4E:_7 14EB_B. 16.EB_9 .- .- 1 • 'x CgJt... ,e4 i J: • Y_� ,{/+ SYSTEM V7 333 S V1 #1 3{a ; # '14HH-J \7 `t # t B 1 a # o + • 4 6 B 19 B•.1 F tt• L 14EB-3.� ]4E8-10 14EB-u•.• +• ,r 16FB-H 1 ? :2 •- '�' 1 > # .i .` �17B84 G 14EB91 5 : 6FB-12 : 3 : C�( } ..E i t. i `: ,...1,6,E.8.:A2...,,::A?•48y1LB 16FB.'Z�.i ...S.f. ...,...,,,:::::'t:..:.:.,,...- ...:I4GB-& S:: /tC 1 St 1 14HB-� .. .... [S - .._. ..= LEGEND E8-21 1618- 1 -16FB-20 ® GB� �..,. ,. ...............:.:....:.....E..14EB-4'l C6•-LB-IB'. 16.EB— -:16.E,-6 ,.21 4�',,,..-,.:..,..:..:..,h 141B:-L.,,,::.,:...l4cB-7 11—�.� � .. BME•-6� . -;...... .. 3 .ei i f >: 'Q. +21124 �9 ' / I ), �O '=- STORM SEWER 1-mac Q >21E2-4 :•2LE2-2 -'t , .. r... 2LH2-2 Y� VY LE2-1' "Y , v' - • L; •:_ ;. .:t - f.l'i 21H2-1 DITCH LINES 2 C `•2LE2-J' • , 21H2-Y �• DRCH $ �Q Ave S I"• r~ ..• zLE34Z ;'ztE7-u ' 2tW� .� �zr1 �� •/ i4‘1/ 0•• ,, 5 ':, CATCH BASKS ..> A - ram t,v 3 9 ;•i:: LW\• /3 �1 '. it N ,,--..AA.. 2LE3-20. -.. ---J 2LG]-16•, i ,• al ......2LW-5 24H3-� ''s 2Z83-1 r -..M1 O -11 ....., .. dl 2LG3-1r . • 21W-IH-• v>< ,..` DIRECTION ARROWS 21E3-1 , ' .^^^" 2LG3-17 2U13-0•--, - ./ ztw r 21 G3 ` ' .,..••• 21F3-7:..4•..•'''•' '� •-,:..,• 9 •2LHJ-B ir,....- jar 2LC72. ..`-` 21F :.,,,...::"^ 2LG3-2 E OC? , • 5 CULVERT CRO ; y ... : ....... 21E7-B..,.,.....,+. 21W-3 f•... SS 21F7 %YNN { "•` '2LG3 13 ,2LG3-12 21H3-2 { ` r -. ‘•- RENTON OI, CITY UMITS S / f1I7-1�.V^r,l... 5 ---2LH3-1 . '21W-14 2 7 2•�6 I _YA 24E3-5 a,: _ ,. i+ ti ' '', 2LG3-IS i ,i, .,.........{ 21FI-12 2143-4 214-16 ' % % 2LW-11 2LW-11 2LW-� _2LHt-�i.' #:� r 0 • • 2LW-6 } \ %."' 21i�-1 2U',_3 •21G1-12 --1 2LH4-15 : 21.H4-11, /:- Z ..:�.•^. + S{ ? 21F+4-1721W-1 2LG-7 2LW-B 21J14-18 ? 12t +• # 23F�_g 2LW-5 21G4-3 21114-7 E 2kHa-6 21F4-11 21F4-5 • + 21,N�-13:• f 2Uu-9 / S+ Bert#ort ilEttn Pt '�-.......-. 21}.-19 d 2LW-2:.. 21F4t14` l.2LH4-Ia 24E4-5 21.Ei=2•`•�•.... 21.W-6 21.E4_3 '''../, . / 2114-6 // ,.• 21.E4-4 24F4-B 2LW-9 2tG�-10 ..-• 2LF1-2 i+ • DISCLAIMER 1 2LE4-1 .. .,,....,:.,+.....,..1--Vim.• ' __ : ..+ 3 t • zt65-1z lrE ; THIS INVENTORY INFORMATION FOR THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM • 2LG5-115-1 •+•""•• •%•�••}• 2tl15-6 > ; IT SCHEMATIC BEST INFORMATION ION IT VAS A LABLEamPILED RATSTHMUMEROUS IS TIME.AND SHOlLD 1 S� •-,`r>• • z- • „ _21.45 ll ..-. I BE USED FOR GENERAL GUIDANCE ONLY. THE CITY OF RENTON •._.... { 4-tYt ,,..,-�.,.._- s - IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS. VHEN THIS S 1L:1 """'t I' INFORMATION IS USED FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES. DESIGNERS .+ • +, '�"' o 'Q'{� s. ARE TO FIELD VERIFY THIS INFORMATION. LI E� 21.H5-5 -• t: 26C5-2 i Y 1 1 S? , ....M •�., ... 3 1?... LEI { 121) _� •i N 1 :::-_ i+;' ft • $N O 2LG5-2 -•1�'t` 'ICI : O .% ''S 15th St "- € 3I 5 ; /24H5=3., ?7 :. ..._ _.._ _.. w.:.,.:..n.:: s lsr► 40 0 8 0 0 2LG T. { c ,z..t `2LG5 6 -.:...,: ▪ v : : .,. .}.- 2LG5-1 1 2LG5-5 •::::::.::.::..— •}:iSY }}}: }:4:•I }N • v, >' #21G6-9 - i • t 'i 52 > • 1E6-7 • S , v ,. •, 21fd-7 w2ZH6-5 X v'22M-1 �� O 2LE6-1 `< '1 _ t . .,.,... it •`L' y; 3.. }k C 1". - `-�+Z,ice. #+> e G� k 2 ; t -- , Y -• t t' > , , 22C6_ W TECHNICAL SERVICES P/B/P 2tG6-z • .�j , , 09/23/96 2:t ¢ € S 16th St ,t t .•4; =... >t _a INTO NE6-2 1 1 ti !O • k1 N V. �t f r .:..,V.zW6 S•�•2LH6-6 r 2U16-� `r -I- A > si' t}7, ▪ r 1 F ?� 3\, .a3i 7 • f _ t i i vrc_} ▪ Oi 3 5319 SE 1/4 • 5319 NE 1/4 .. , ,,J 1.„... ,,,„7. ,. 1 , i „ ,. r•-• , .. ,--. ., :, `•• -,'-, •t•-.. .t, • .i i • •)•••• • .:., "•;. •-'. ' ii- i: i', \ f, . : . , , . , , , I , --.•. . .' :! - :411111L11- it '• :' • : ' ' 177iirl- niliffilf *- : .- '' % -fir . - : -4 3 -: -4 . , 4 . ,!, 3 _ ... ,., ..., •..••. ., , ...•I ... I - .I •„. ! t • . . .,.. . ..• , ,-- 5319 W 1/2 • , . "\> ' gr/1 Cs"'-:, - a '''.,. IT.1.. .1:. 14,k • •--''• . --g••• 1--g . -.... Vz - •.,--- .... •.•-•‘ 5 .--. 12" . - t . ,401 . -..;"•.,. -,. ',. • E, . • 4 1'4 • • 1 ,L E Valley ‘--kl -. •• '",‘ \ \ :: .......... . • . : . . A --. NJ CX) . 41: ..,.,.. A • i CO k ; . k,. ,,. ., 1 . . 0 0 -e .... . :.• k k.':., * -. . --. lei : , ......._ . .... _ 1 --• .... •-• U • .6 - - . = I . 1 „......, •41/ g -I PAP' Z t „1.....„. g .. .„:1 ,.....--...„•• -., ........„; ::.,.:„.. ..... :::., .. . .. ...t.* — ---••••••....... ...... . 4 I _... .: g.. iji ...........------ -•*50 .3*IVVV''' SIA...A.,,....01,6 . --...2 , . , ?so• si., - -1- : -- •- cto- „ ., , ... .... ,.-. ,.. . /.:—.4........_ . : • ., •.------i ,..., — ..... ,.. „......"--• •-•1 •. i: . cn •, ,.... . , - - .. , - si..-.,., \...,. 0 4 . b-] PEI 1 ; ,..„........._,........ ,........„....,.,..,. ,,,,,,,,,...„...........,..v.„----- „ ....,,,,,, .„,.....,. : ,_... ... .. . c ...... „::-, .... .,.. . .... , , :.,,,,k.„,... ,.... g ..„ ........ .. 3 g , , . -: •• • . -", •• , ;: . • - - • • .. , 0 'N.. ..4,... ., \\., CIR. 1.1 , -•. \ \.' . ..".. • CO . . , I .• . • . ! ... - • . ..2 e S --------- ' g "%:, ....... s. •........ ..--- .(5)" V \ ;. ra --. : ; \ cia. .• el Lake St. S . • .........„.. .„....•.........1C...:3I r-C...-..-...1.-.....•-• F.... •• D.....-...-. ..i....v...,.•.1._. s".......,-N.,.......lV.„. ..e.-.1:i.......„'.......-._--'-'''-....N.,....A.... 1.pi IC•DiE,., \,'..,.•.. :-.........„..•. : e ll O om .;-. 5 ,e;•.i.k ig1,3-t i..,1-.V 1\,..-..-...t4.U...1.. !-c•.- .*.-..•.r•:. -....It .,... sr. • co_ ,• 8 s , . ...1 • ,...&. •. -...:,... •..,,'-•,i‘E•.,1 ,.., .•:, • ; ... 1 ••• • 1 .. w I • 16Sha. -- 6 a-__ •----.....": . „„ ,..,...--"• .. ...: . E ...- ' -rn c-i- #• 1 -- g . lc- • 1' .---41m1 Shattuck 16ive S ' ' -'.- s 1 L........._ cai-........,.,.;......,..., _ ....,...----- . - : : .. .. . --T-r - , , • - " 3 :, ,,,, 9 tv:-.. 1. _„...... Co -----. .•->4.. - : r" - • • — f__*I- 6" - -. .' .. :i. 1 • te.) 2': 4...,„ '--1 .eff6. 8„ . ...,_,..: ,._ :.6.... u-. .. .. .............. • .• ' 1 . 0 3 •.. ti.L.„..,....:7:7k 7.?...: . ,,,, .,...., . . . . , •,. rl , cc co ....,,,.., .... . , b...1 i „.., .. ....... „1 : . : : . .... . . ....... . a .. 4.1 .i.... : .1Whitwor,t '. :,., , I...t. • .. •_..,-.....1.-,,....:,- --zst.-:..t til . se . 0 il %.2 : Ot: jr.1.:.' ; ... . Morris . S Ave: : .:. , 1.; „..: ..•:: • , 8„ a• . -. `•.'7'•-c) W .'s ': t t - s-- • (etzt 6•c• 't, .'s ,.. . , 6" • 4. • -.....- ---- - ' 4-------- ........- ..... b.) I 7S,D ‘• N.. • 1-7Q, ! :: : -t „a . 1.1_,• -.--- • 0------:----- ,....,.... .. .. . , . • • ... '. % c-i- - uV c''...-, --......--ma----fts..... I_ I ' ' bal •ft, . 1 N.3-: t 1 ' tA ...N Morns , . 0 , .„. ... ,. • (11: %. ' 11 IT/11, 4 • 41 A.1..,-1 .. .... ,-. -1.... •• .t ;S .:\••:-. •••.CZ)..: : -- 1 •;. ; '!÷"... 1 0 - -1. .‘ 0 „W fa, - : -' 1 ..`"4-..: , •••-, • • .: •----- ( •a, •CID Zi • 1 P.. i. r, \ e: s%._ .• , , . • \ ei -•,--„,„.;,. „ • --...., - .. ...-. 8" ol --k i r i r--7-- • .., : , „. 4,'' 1---`2 i 4 % • ' • - ,1 • .. • ,-4 : 6 I i ••• i $g .; ).--. • \ it''.'''Nik ...,-,..„..4.-:. : _.3.. • .., c.• 1.••;,4 - .0. : :•••.• i....... i ! c-+- . ". 7' I.n.it.ner§ k4 \ c,......1 ci, • i - • . ite. \ 3: , • , , • i 1 c+.• . , p . .. •1.„...,• . ,.. . k \ ,. r IA, :CZ • • • .: C% ."--`• -• ' ..... . . - -4-.....-- ........4...... • cp ....: 1.•• . i .....i....,,x.',;=;:.;Vic*:.***1.:' V, : . . ...14:g • • ci) g 1 - 4 ; // 1 t‘• ss. . v...., - ---1 C . • , -p- NJ it CD • 1.1=h- col I • • • : 4 __. ...• . of ... i "' ' .- I- .•-•*: ,,p ' ---.1::.:, . :-i----- ' ... . • •-•1 '01 1 .• -• .:e . . . % ° 7.,, • '-% .zi ..,,,.. 03 [ . . . If „ . 1 .- ' ..'• • ...., ... .../\'"\ ...... ,,.., '41••••17::°""%1...Z. 41"r""•;!? ...... . . . • . , 0 0 NI 1... ••••Ji • ICE.. •..."4'," ••••• • . s. .i•• s : '•:)=1;.1 sli r.:1 '• -•...:•-,- -,:,,:.: N....... .., .g " 1 ............-,/ . : /........,„._-.* s • ...„--• .,./ --'''''s 0 C) 1 c"- . ; _,.. .:„. up.,--- m - 44.E-1 ;.•-• ... .. a -i ..s.s.... ,...,,....6. .,...:.; ..P.t.”.„..... • • ILI '''.',.0., <,:.,.... • .: '• § ..- .......-','''.... ..;:;0.,2mt.r.s...*”.*"......... .. ri•••••••••••-'''''5, 11°Atkr• sl - 211• '' LA..., \*. 4, t• : . . . -.....-.1.,..T.„-,•••,. ...-- u; .. u •i-4 --1-1,t, i 1 •. .=.4.-,. , 1 \ ..,....., , - 1-.............. . ..,, -0 '•••1. g...,............— . .. ...,. ----------11 \ , . • • mi .....-.,--.,-- • s\.7,-."- -- PI 7$Oth..,71,••"'APSVP2SPY,5421r1 ..1.% t.-s ...,,sA.......WW2•M•S''`.'w.' 'V „.P0.4.,...e".. ' M . 8" L- . . . --.. ..4 . 4...- _.-, \ ,.../ • --- (3) 0 r. '''s• 'z,z2'2•N',•,',.-^"zacsemarK=rtge=cmcantr r 'x'• ' W...00...exatwe':,*".•ZI, i / / • .---N &Tea • •,e •••e;•,' ...., g_4...„ ....jr- VI‘Iftrstt,:31.1. ."..•". - % . .s.- •-• 0 ..1----. .; .; / 1 %. • _..,SPF •• ..,..„. /671.----"s-, "....s,._ • . • \ s'/ .. •. . . .. • e s. : ••, 0 pz, .,... .,: ,.: , i.. •,-,•,,•*- , ..,, 3.,___,.._..m........, ,. ..., . .....„ ••••-•-•• . .•-• a ,.... -1...,..,. •u-ii ..... ...„. ..../ ...,.... ........---4, 1: 12" cn fbfl .... .- •-• ........„.• ,,....1 , • 1-,, ,e1 • c0 : :. '-',. - Lea 4 ....., 1 17-22,,,...,,..... ...„......,.....-.' , •-•:1*-E ..-'•7'7.r-X---."-----4-• • • :: : . .-1 • , i'i• )... ' • Cith,f I a. • :Ds CO 8" . „, . " ." ,.,• . IQ, .... .„-- . s tap Wig d gig 4 e• 1;s:s ...... s. ,. c5 u . '' . . . . 1 . ‘o 0' , A„ .,..•••••,:"-- .....--- r.-... ; •••-• -.... N... ,,,....., •N........M ; I .- • ..?7, ,,:\ ...:i.. . ,. 1. .'' • • 32a ....... ...„--- ....,,...,. ..---• .....,,,' • • • : v C) \ • . N. s' s'„. a. k. • il 4.--a. . .., ril ,... • - - ‘ PO I I- ... • "1:1 i ...- „.....--•'' -• • .., .. ,, 2 d% ....... ...... . :;: .CP .. 01 \, - \ \,,,, ,..::-.......!. „..,.,: -..,.,... , k_S-'' • .....•-• .• ..... •• 0 . • ...,.,„ .‹ „ .. . „..,,, . . \ 1--e• . 8--....: - ...-\,,,..c. --$.', ."-N . . ..,.-•- ... \ .-....,„„_,•• ,„1,,, ks... . "1:'"---' '"1 N .' •,(, ) '•• • 1 • r I gm— •, \ ....„. .r„,,,,,,,,............ssi.,..,....,.. ....... ........... , • ....._!", -a, .• .%N....‘ -'"•M 14" .0-• - LI"''' - ... _= LA 42'5' on • ) 4.- - 4... ...." e- ' __AD" 4 •- „. . • . I • ._ _, ZTI At OZES . • :• _ „ • . . . . . . .. . •....‘•._.„ . , •.. . . - - • •, ,. , . . • • ,........„. . „ .. .. . . . . .. • . . .. . . .. . • . . • . 5318 SE 1/4 f • .- :• _ �� is { _ .... CITY OF RENTON 0 ` SANITARY SEWERS s. •7th St / S 7t:h : , St; 12 ,3 .30816 LEGEND :. 175 9D7..:.:.... 908'` 99g. ;' 91D 21 : • -1.-.. 906 17 18 �19 METRE 24 �.,,• .. SEWER LINES 1 14 e' i'r I ————— PRIVATE SEWER LINES 145 .... �' 8 :.243 : ,0. 218•••" $' i• FORCE MANS i• `►� r� r 1 i t e15,:r.!I METRO LNES y ! �` 810 81 •MHO 812 / < : • .. a- MANHOLES r •• } + off }j: ! PRIVATE MANHOLES { • f j 247 90 25 • . s s . „.,., METRO MANHOLES • UU 5 11 \�ay A:•v�.� pF.: 34 1 CLEAN OUTS 27 ® 38 S : _. ..l • r' W DIRECTION ARROWS a f W _ 28 30 9 s , l• 'j I.. bV • v: . .. � is :.• ,`- f f 0 L��T STATIONS ' 0 18' 33 m : O� r'` ® " /� Iv e '' `` / Z FLOW DECT1ON =� o ,8 m S �e ton Villace PI ` e a''•' 37 40 J41 1 / ��2 2. RENTON CTY'LIMITS . PI 4• 31--.. _ 4. f'ti'�Jf � 18' . 18' 18' 18' iir ..,:�' •[a . . • O �' • . 32 'I 45 v f.. n, 81 } 'r 7 xk...-- •• 1 • s •- • DISCLAIMER: ' THIS INVENTORY INFORMATION IS SCHEMATIC ONLY. IT WAS COMPILED iv k 71 ?"'- ?,---- ti FROM.NUMEROUS SOURCES. IT IS THE BEST INFORMATION a.... 10 A 79 82 a AT E 46 " = 8 6 • A THIS TIME ANDSHOULDBE USEDFOR GENERAL j f t� _ `t GUIDANCE ONLY. THE CITY OF RENTON IS NO RESPONSIBLE FOR ,, s . f $' i E .73 m [�} ERRORS OR OMISSIONS. WHEN THIS INFORMATION IS USED FOR 83 :-• >84 � '-,.-' : -, PLANNING. DESIGNS. AND/OR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. USERS ARE ,' 'm ; m�' 1/2 TO FIELD VERIFY THIS INFORMATION. fia 47 f. . . --1—' < .4 78 .'— .'91 i _ bi5. 70 1f 74 6 48 _ t h :St 64 ,.... 1 '• 1.,. i 1 43,.. 2 94# < 0 400 800 .8•• 8' t `, �8 8 77 v�• 802_ - •:; :::•:;.;,, 44 f s:'' t4 • ♦ — lJ _ .... 1 r .tY 49 •� t f • _ �s , ( �� 9,�, UTILITY SYSTEMS a T i 2 66 i....3. i i ~,, S r : :. #6 �111 : • 97 } k �� ♦ i P/B/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES ' n t 7 i j : 603 100y 99 I. r i i /�/ 98 • ._ 1 n� Ix. • 96 8D4 : \ ... ; . �, • 8' 1 . n s . = I 5319 NE 1/4 5319 SE 1/4 - .. ! CLARK JOHNSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1418-112th AVENUE N.E. RECEIVED BELLEVUE,WA 98004 1� (206) 454-7137 AUG2 � FAX (206) 637-2949 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON July 12, 1997 Chuck Pepka, Owner Renton Coil Spring Company 325 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98057 Re: PRELIMINARY Report for structural site visit on 6/11/97 to Renton Coil Spring Company Future Facility To whom it may concern, The site is flat and contains three tilt up concrete buildings. The buildings are typical for their age and in general are in excellent shape with many years of service still available in them. They are probably constructed built on piles, which is typical in that area, which is old lake bottom, prior to lowering Lake Washington. There are three buildings on the site. A one story dock high building attached to a partial 2= story dock high building. In one corner of the lot, there is a one story building for trucks and buses. The oldest building was built in 1954 and is now used as a warehouse with high stacked storage. The building was built as a truck transfer station for loading and unloading heavy storage. The roof is 2x6 T&G decking with sawn purlins at 8' o.c. spanning to large sawn girders in steel post caps, supported on sawn wood columns; and concrete pilasters built into the 6" tilt-up concrete walls. The exterior walls and interior party wall are all tilt-up concrete walls. The lower floor is concrete slab at dock height or 4 feet above the surrounding parking area. As all the surrounding heavy buildings in the area are built on piles, this building would also be built on piles. The two buildings show no signs of movement since construction. The roofing of the one story transfer building is fairly new, but the flashing is old and the parapet is not tall enough. In extreme storms the roof it leaks into the space below. The concrete walls are not tied to the roof purlins, ledgers and roof girders per the UBC code for seismic wall anchors. The ledgers are in cross grain bending (forbidden by the code), and would need seismic upgrade. Also, as far as we can tell there is no plywood roof diaphragm over the 2x6 T&G decking, and to bring up to code a new plywood roof diaphragm would have to be installed over the T&G deck. The 6'tilt-up concrete walls do not appear to have suffered cracking or other distress since they were built. The pile supported structural slab is not significantly cracked where we could • view it. Page 2 of 2 Report/Coil Spring Co. • The attached 2-story transfer building has a nearly flat timber framed roof, utilizing the same framing system as the one story transfer building. The second floor is 3"tongue & groove decking with beams at approximately 6' o.c.. There does not appear to be any plywood over the 3x T&G decking, as would be required in the present code. Also, the floors and roof are not anchored to the exterior walls per present code. Where the second floor ends over the transfer station, there does not appear to be any shear resisting elements for the transfer of seismic and wind loads down to the ground to comply with seismic requirements. One way to solve this problem would be to add a timber or concrete shear wall where the partial office floor ends over the truck bay area or add X-bracing in one bay or add a rigid steel frame. The exterior walls and slab floors do not show signs of cracking and the building appears to be level and plumb, indicating a proper pile foundation. The one story vehicle repair building at the Northwest corner of the site has long span steel roof decking spanning 2 steel beams on interior posts (we did not climb on the roof of this . building). The rear walls are concrete. The two side walls are concrete and have clear story glass with columns going up to the roof. The front wall is garage doors with a small concrete shear wall at one corner of the garage door side. The floor is heavily scarred with use and oil stains. The garage door side has steel beam lintels made of steel tube and tube columns. The buildings were typical construction for their use when they were built and do not appear to have been significantly upgraded since they were first constructed. We did not see any structural problems which could not be fixed. But for a new user the buildings should be upgraded to the present earthquake and wind codes. If you have any questions or comments please call. Sinncerely, l....._ J. Clark Johns n, P.E. cc: Victor Carpine INISIIMIIMISON 60' 4. EXIT o - 0 0 Zci o EXISTING BUILDING #3 g EXI (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) ti 6,194 s.f. / \ ai "." \\\, cn •.--, \\ EXIT MAIN 0Li. �� \\\:\.\\:\ `+ � ENTRY cn wry j j," -/-7 \4 N. flll®T FLOORPLAN ,..- \\\ E \ \\\\ \\\\ \N ro 'a IliF aa)i ►EW�CROP ED UILL,.G R - EXIT (LI .T M UFA RI : LI HT N. E •A `OMA co 1 �00 f. CD `� \ \ a; \\\\ \\\\\\\‘\ FER \. E \ i r----7 .. " \ \ N \\\ o - I EXI m -\cu I EXIT N // I 1 �� aJ • .1/, l ! - 1 N I / I 7NESE 0 5 WU-SE ROLLED . (EXISTIN- OFFICES) \\\ I /// I " "mY�"p EXISTING BUILDING #1 4,600 s.f. DM ::Ills (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) N. I/ EXISTI G BUILDIN 82 I I. u� 10,933 s.f. / N i (EXISTINg 2 OADI7 f dd BAYS) N �_ LLI ^ 111ESE pyivAFD DOCK-X LOADING co _ // I N N i DOCK DDOR IGGVIORA NOPflINN g in NI —� gi9 I I 1 I O RIESE DOORS MIu 9E REPLACED NEW coo INFu ENTRY =mecum FLOOR move E co &ROOM FLOOR PLAN 4 FM�Y FOORL PLAM p Z I—I 100' 149' J O 4 I L.7 4 . / . , i - 101 RA 9039 L' I RENTON COIL SPRINQ COMPANY 97- GENERALIZED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS RICHERT C W E R T de ASSOCIATES a1 434 S.W. 7TH ST. RENTON, WA. 98057 SHEET ISSUE E FOR ARCHITECTS PLANNERS `O RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY A 1 z 325 BURNER AVE. N., RENTON, WA. 98057 En 9311 Southeast 36th ST. #110 phone: (206) 232-1700 • c FLOOR PLANS Mercer Island, Wo. 98040-3799 fax: (206) 232-1706 r, L O • ----SECOND STORY SIEVING--+ ...-- AMINO -- �NtassiC WALL �Pi ° 1 i I FOSSTDBE auaPiFs IS REQUIRED'® 1 \ I CD O o cD Z DDa1 EAST ELEVATION TO BE REPLACED IMMO DOOR —HI NT PANED BAND w AT DISE Cr MUMS STEM 110011 TO BE REPLACED CD LO N I/ 1 v~ � •ri Cr) I 4-I -ry , PKR EXISINO �coNxvEiE WAL N li c N co U74-rrrrs- i WEST ELEVATION AT BCE RODEO OF BUILENG oEWING DOCA 1 ill TO BE REPLACED WITH WINDOW E DESIGN INTENT - NEW ENTRY _ STUN (O - A SIGNATURE STRUCTURE THAT WILL CELEBRATE C THE RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY AND SIGNAL • C- THE BUILDNNOS MAN ENTRY.THE STRUCTURE [wSTNO WPDOwi WILL BE INTEGRATED YMH THE NEW ENTRY STEPS RtOPOSLD!EW tiriNicS OVEN WIDOWS al AND A.D.A.ACCESS RAMP.IT MALL BE A INN FIJITURE WITHIN THE NEVI PEDESTRIAN COURT. � I I I I I I. I I J l l l l l l l l l l l l THE STRUCTURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED FROM 1111111111111= 1111111111111_ 1111111111111 11111111111111 111'IG11111111 EXPC1SED TUBULAR SR}1%vim METAL ROOFING. ® If7 � � i - %/ i //// i :%i =, i •i i i _ / ��i mi EX W O - o CANOPY 0 Ili li - -D%SWG 01ERWAD DOORS In AND DOCKED LO DNO DOCKS E - I .I - - TO ROMAN,2 dMS _ -H I F-- ILL EIOSTNO TRUCKDOCK?CCD U ACCENT PADBFD BAND D%bTNO MINI DOOR TO BE RFPIACtD AT TY�OF BIRDO/0 FLAIR/ VDCORS WILL BE REPINED THESE DOORS WILL BE REPLACED ""WIDOW SYSTEM NORTH ELEVATION CO NFU AWAL1S IAND/ INNDNG WM1 ASI ETWAll'PLEAWD NFU/WANJS ND/OR MIIDOW9 NFU WALLS ND/OR MOON EXSTIN0 WINDOWS QJ PROPOSED NEW MOMS OVER WDDOWS ro 11111111111111 1 I{J 1 QT m O Part D XSIWO al / OXE TE WALL 1 CD CD CT) — / Ln 3 O Z \ OCSE DOERS -ACCENT PLANTED ENO 3 BUILDING #1 & 2 ALLSAND/ORET YPL[ASING / . SOUTH ELEVATION "'NM-SE oPNNUID.D 0 C {TC I�IOI GL VGQTIO - — rJ — _ / -- ----- SCALE: 1/=1.-C i JOB Y I RA 97-9039 Li ;- _1_1 2Nr a RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY RICHERT & ASSOCIATES °'�""W °A� GENERALIZED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS LCR 8-1_97" 434 S.W. 7TH ST. RENTON, WA. 98057 SHEET ISSUE , E ROE RECYCUio AREAS AND RooFTOP MOMENT.TO BE SCREENED FOR ARCHITECTS P LAN N ERS RENTONR COIL SPRING COMPANY A 2 325 BURNETT AVE. N., RENTON, WA. 98057 ---.... , __________________________L\_____7L, . . . , Z 9311 Southeast•36th ST. #110 phone: (206) 232-1700 co EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Mercer Island, Via. 98040-3799 fax: (206) 232-1706 c g - (O L • I Pwwl L_ /OONCiLTE W1LL N N o 0 0 \ CD --ACCENT MATED MO AT BASE OF WILDING ci 0 SOUTH ELEVATION LD 7 • a; N I--- C7 /_ .. N •� N ai I cl) ArMECawMI�'i� ° WEST ELEVATION BUILDING #4 EXTERIOR IOO R ELEVATIONS a; E SCALE: t/6-1'-0' ro C �- L o la ar 40' CD En LID L. ) EXETNo YENDOAS LH PREFORM NEW AWM/a 11 I I 11 1 L -17-rT- ///--- E . 7/ 7-P WALL r (O --. !Iirr JL DOOR 1 O EAST ELEVATION ,AE Y REMIND SOUTH ELEVATION CO a; (a -MONO WINDOWS 0 w IIII MI cri CO p1 �CONCREIE W41 �PCWICFEIE WJLL� (moo O — O Q) . Cl) o WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION Z H o BUILDING #3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS a --- — SCALE: 1/5--1.-7 _ Li r•ir 0Ala :� RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY RICWERT & s ae ASSOCIATES D/ RA 97DOTE-9039 NOTE GENERALIZED ARCHITECTURAL. ELEVATIONS LCF1 a-1-97 434 S.W. 7TH ST. OFORENTON, WA. 98057 ARCHITECTS PLANNERS E REFUSE/RECYCLING AREAS AND ROOFTOP EWDMENI TO BE SCREENED SHEET I,SUE 0 RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY A 325 OURNETT AVE. N., RENTON, WA. 98057 01 9311 Southeas<.36th ST. #110 phone: (206) 232-1700 c EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Mercer Island, Wa. 98040-3799 fox: (206) 232-1706 CO L 0 • of si use - ' 7 i, i ....rt' k #¢ a t i RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY Proposed New Site Existing North Elevation Building no. 1 i i i4 limrt �•. Y".wa..'MM`^t IIrM t *SOYA r,..i}�... t, t• - - ill t NKR• u. iiv r * . M • +G h `' .{r ,� , S t # a�Y-y *y 1, } u. i �Sr r a ,N,: 1 t f^ " d � c�ik y�# rik,:�a�an i� �,� • • ,F c a rxcs: , max 'c r , ,�,-''i�Y sx' + r a w ;r t +r sue, ;{• w,,. a_a �� .,,, _ ,k�„, " , 1r"a�, e A� ^. ?, ♦> t ,. Oft,-ps..!' t qtr+ '" r t Y} yt� a tr °+ , r ,,,,,fix i `,c 404,r•} ry,s 9e'-+., + e s ' ttl. "� ''�yw=�47+ x"'l.'#j';"d, v. R 's; t'4 W`1 v: i fi { RENTON COIL SPRING COMPANY Proposed New Site Existing North Elevation Building no. 2 6*Geo Engineers 3.-enk May 7, 1997 Consulting Engineers and Geoscientists Offices in Washington, Oregon,and Alaska Castagno Brothers' Trust do Key Trucking Company 7630 South 196th Street Kent, Washington 98032 . Attention: Gary Castagno Ground Water Monitoring Report LTS Trucking Facility 423 South 7th Street Renton, Washington GEI No. 5285-002-T14 INTRODUCTION This letter presents the results of GeoEngineers' ground water monitoring services at the LTS Trucking Facility. The site is located at 423 South 7th Street in Renton, Washington. The site is shown relative to surrounding physical features in Figure 1. We understand that the property is owned by the Castagno Brothers' Trust and is leased by LTS Trucking Company. The facility consists of a warehouse and loading dock building, and a garage building. A 10,000-gallon diesel UST (underground storage tank) and a 5,000-gallon gasoline UST were reportedly removed from two separate excavations on the site in the late 1980s prior to the promulgation of the Washington State Department of Ecology's(Ecology) Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) regulations. Confirmatory soil samples were apparently not collected from the excavations at the time the tanks were removed. AGRA Earth and Environmental Services performed a subsurface investigation at the site as a part of a pre-purchase assessment of the property in May 1996. The purpose of the assessment was to evaluate the potential presence of petroleum-related contamination in soil and ground water in the areas of the former USTs. AGRA reported that petroleum-related contamination was detected at concentrations exceeding MTCA Method A cleanup levels in soil and ground water samples collected in the areas of the former USTs and along the western property line. The contamination along the western property line appears to be migrating onto the site from the adjacent property. RE,CE,VED GeoEngineers,Inc 1101 Fawcett Ave.,Suite 2007..2 5 /997 T anna,WA 98402 Telephone(206)383-4940 uf=VELOPMENT PLANNING CIT!OF RENTON I1. Fax(206)383-4923 The Castagno Broths Trust May 7, 1997 Page 2 GeoEngineers was retained in August 1996 to evaluate the extent of petroleum-related soil and ground water contamination in the areas of the former USTs and remove the petroleum- contaminated soil. GeoEngineers and Glacier Environmental Services removed approximately 185 cubic yards of petroleum-contaminated soil from the areas of the former UST excavations and from an area along the western property liner The soil was transported to the South Seattle transfer station for disposal at Rabanco Regional'Disposal Company's landfill near Roosevelt, Washington. Residual petroleum-related contamination at concentrations greater than MTCA Method A cleanup levels remains in soil oeneittitheititstendfoUtheioistehotiaorbhilding and tli ttheast; corner`Of the garage'13=11%:" Additional excavation in these areas could not be conducted without jeopardizing the structural integrity of the buildings. Our remedial activities are presented in fill rther detail in our report dated October 10, 1996 PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of our services was to establish long-term ground water monitoring points and evaluate current ground water conditions in the arias adjacent to the former UST locations. Our specific scope'of services is listed below. 1. Install four ground water monitoring probes using direct-push methods in the areas of the former UST excavations. 2. Survey the wellhead elevations relative to an arbitrary benchmark on the site. Measure the depth to'ground water in the monitoring probes, calculate the ground water table elevation and interpret the direction of shallow ground water flow beneath the site. . 3. Obtain ground water samples from monitoring probes MP-1 through MP-4. Submit the samples to an analytical laboratory for analysis of gasoline-range hydrocarbons using Ecology Method WTPH-G, diesel-range hydrocarbons using Ecology Method WTPH-D, benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene and total xylenes (BETX) using EPA Method 8020, and dissolved lead using EPA Method 7421 (filtered samples). 4. Evaluate the laboratory data with regard to.current MTCA regulations. - RESULTS GROUND WATER MONITORING PROBES : Four ground water monitoring probes were installed using a StrataProbe direct-push rig owned by Transglobal Environmental Geosciences (TEG) of Lacey, Washington. The probes were installed to depths of approximately 15 feet below ground surface in the areas of the former USTs and areas where previous detections of petroleum hydrocarbons were observed in ground water at the site. The probes were installed in the locations shown in Figure 2. The probes consist of 1-inch diameter PVC casing and screen and are completed inside flush-mounted well monuments. • GeoEngineers .. File No.5285-002-14 The Castagno Brotr_ Trust May 7, 1997 Page 3 GROUND WATER FLOW The direction of ground water flow at the site was evaluated by surveying the top of each monitoring probe casing relative to an arbitrary benchmark and measuring the depth to ground water in each probe relative to the top of the casing. Ground water measurements are presented in Table 1. Field methods are described in Appendix A. In general, ground water is present at a depth of two feet or less beneath the site. The direction of ground water flow on April 25, 1997 was toward the north-northwest. Ground water elevation contours and flow direction are shown in Figure 3. CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL DATA Groundwater Ground water samples were collected from monitoring probes MP-1 through MP-4 for chemical analysis for the presence of gasoline- and diesel-range hydrocarbons, BETX and dissolved lead. The samples were analyzed for organic constituents by TEG's laboratory in Lacey, Washington. Dissolved lead analysis was performed by Spectra Laboratory in Tacoma, Washington. Gasoline- and diesel-range hydrocarbons were analyzed using Ecology Methods WTPH-G and WTPH-D, respectively. BETX were analyzed using EPA Method 8020. Dissolved lead was analyzed using EPA Method 7421. A summary of current and historical ground water chemical analytical data is presented in Table 2. Laboratory reports are contained in Appendix B. • Petroleum-related hydrocarbons were not detected in any of the water samples. Dissolved lead was detected in the water sample collected from MP-3 at a concentration equal to the MTCA Method A cleanup level of 5 micrograms per liter (deg/1). Lead was not detected in the water samples obtained from the other three monitoring probes. CONCLUSIONS The analytical data indicate that petroleum-range hydrocarbons were not detected during this monitoring event. Dissolved lead was detected in the ground water sample collected from MP-3 at a concentration of 5 µg/1 which is equal to the MTCA Method A cleanup level. Based on the laboratory results, remedial efforts in August 1996 appear to have been successful in mitigating soil and ground water contamination in the areas of the former underground storage tanks. TII limited areas of petroleum-contaminated solRemaining beneathbeneath.th4wildintimarto be impacting ground water. We recommend that the Castagno Brothers' Trust pursue a determination of "No Further Action" for the site under Ecology's Independent Remedial Action Program (IRAP). This process will require the submittal of this report and GeoEngineers' October 1996 report along with an IRAP application and $1,000 review fee to Ecology's Northwest Regional Office. GeoEngineers File No.5285-002-14 The Castagno Broth Trust May 7, 1997 Page 4 • Additional fees totaling 2 percent of the total remedial costs will be assessed by Ecology prior to issuing the NFA. We will be pleased to assist,you in filing the application.. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for use by the Castagno Brothers' Trust and may be made ;I available to regulatory agencies. This report may be provided to potential purchasers of the property for review purposes only. This report is not intended for use by others, and the information cointained herein is not applicable to other sites. wl Our int i rpretations of ground water conditions are based on field observations, measurements land chemical analytical data. It is(always possible that areas with contamination exist in portions of the site that were not explored or analyzed. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. -1 No other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. 4 0 ► Please contact us if you have questions regarding the information presented in this report. We appreciate the opportunity to be of continued service to the Castagno Brothers' Trust on this project. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. I William E. Halbert Senior Hydrogeologist veti John H. Biggane Principal WEH:JHB:vc Document 1D: 5285002R.WPD . Attachments GeoEngineers File No.5285-002-14 • Geo - Engineers . January 6, 1997 Consulting Engineers and Geosclendsts Offices in Washington, Oregon,and Alaska Castagno Brothers Trust 7630 South 196th Street Kent, Washington 98032 • Attention: Mr. Gary Castagno GeoEngineers is pleased to submit our report entitled "Geoenvironmental Services, Trucking Facility, 423 South 7th Street, Renton, Washington." Our services were performed in accordance with our signed proposal dated July 23, 1996. We appreciate the opportunity to work with Castagno Brothers Trust on this project. Please contact us if you have questions regarding this report or other aspects of the project. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. //1" /i (/.. John H. Biggane Principal 1t{B:vc Document tu:5285001 R.R File No.5285'001•T14 Gcounglncers,Inc. 1101 FawcettAve,Suite 200 'Noma,WA 95402 Telephone(206)3834940 Fax(206)383-4923 • _ CONTENTS I I _ page No. ' d INTRODUCTION 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES 1 SITE DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND • 2 SOIL CLEANUP LEVELS 2 SUBSURFACE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 3 STRATAPROBE BORINGS 3 General 3 Soil Chemical Analysis 3 Ground Water Chemical Analysis 3 REMEDIAL SOIL EXCAVATIONS 4 General 4 Gasoline UST Dispenser and Pipeline Excavation 4 West Property Line Excavation 8 Diesel UST Excavation 7 CONCLUSIONS 7 LIMITATIONS 8 TABLES • Table No. Summary of Soil Chemical Analytical Data - StrataProbe Borings 1 Summary of Ground Water Chemical Analytical Data;. StrataProbe Borings 2 Summary of Soil Chemical Analytical Data - Gasoline UST Excavation 3 Summary of Ground Water Chemical Analytical Data- Remedial Excavations 4 Summary of Soil Chemical Analytical Data - West Property Line Excavation 5 Summary of Soil Chemical Analytical Data - Diesel UST Excavation 8 FIGURES Route Ns� Vicinity Map 1 Site Plan 2 Gasoline UST ExcavatIon 3 West Property Line Excavation • 4 Diesel UST Excavation 5 • OeoEntIneere' File No,52li5-001-14/010697 CONTENTS (continued) APPENDICES Page No. Appendix A - Field Exploration Program A-1 Appendix B - Chemical Analytical Data B-1 OeoEngineers if File No.5285.001-I4/010697 REPORT , . • GEOENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FORMER TRUCKING!FACILITY 423 SOUTH 7th STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON FOR ,, CASTAGNO BROTHERS TRUST I INTRODUCTION • This report summarizes GeoEngineers' services `lfnvolving the subsurface investigation and remedial excavation activities completed at the property located at 423 Sout h 7th Street in Renton, Washington. The location of the site is shown relative Ito surrounding physical features In Figure 1. , acity diesel UST gallon-capacity 10 We understand that the facility was served by a g P (underground storage tank) and a 5,000 gallon-capacity gasoline UST. We also understand that these tanks were removed in the late 1980's to the promulgation of Ecology's(Washington prior ;il p g State Department of Ecology)MICA(Model Toxics Control Act)regulations. Confirmatory soil samples were apparently not collected at the time the'tanks were removed. AGRA Earth and Environmental performed a subsurface assessment near the former USTs for a potential purchaser of the property in May 1996:' The purpose of the subsurface assessment was to evaluate the potential presence of petroleum-related contamination in soil and ground water- in the areas of the former USTs. In their report dated June 10, 1996, AGRA reported that gasoline-range hydrocarbons were detected in soil and ground water adjacent to the former gasoline UST at concentrations exceeding MICA Method A cleanup levels. Diesel-range hydrocarbons were also detected in soil and ground water adjacent to the'former diesel UST at concentrations exceeding the MTCA Method A cleanup level. Additionally, AGRA detected heavy-oil range(hydrocarbons at concentrations exceeding the MTCA Method A cleanup level in a soil sample collected near a drum located in the southwest corner of die property. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of our services was to perform a,subsurface investigation at the site in the areas of the former USTs and to observe and document the removal of petroleum-contaminated soil from three areas of the site. GeoEngineers' scope of services completed for this project included the following activities: 1. Conduct a survey of subsurface utilities at the site using a subcontracted locating service. 2. Observe the completion of 19 shallow borings at the site using TEG's (Transglobal Environmental Geoscience) StrataProbe device., 3. Collect soil and ground water samples from selected borings. G a o E n g i n e e r s 1 Frilc No.5285.001-141010691 • 4. Submit the soil and ground water samples for analyses of gasoline-range hydrocarbons by Ecology Method WTPH-G, diesel- and heavy oil-range hydrocarbons by WTPH-D • extended, BETX(benzene, ethylbcnzene, toluene and total xylenes)by EPA Method 8020, and specific halogenated hydrocarbons by EPA Method 8010. 5. Observe and document the removal of petroleum-contaminated soil from three remedial excavations completed at the site. 6. Collect confirmatory soil samples from the base and sidewalls of the excavations. Collect ground water samples from two of the three remedial excavations. 7. Submit the soil and ground water samples for analyses of gasoline-, diesel- and heavy oil- • range hydrocarbons and BETX. 8. Evaluate the data with respect to MTCA Method A cleanup levels. • SITE DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND • The subject site is located in the northeast corner of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 in Renton, W. properties , south and east ofEast the subject site. Residential properties Commercial are located north arelocated of theto subjtheectwest site. The site is bordered to the north by 7th Avenue, to the east by property occupied by an Arco AM-PM Mini Mart, to the south by Grady Way and to the west by property occupied by an automobile repair facility. The location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. The subject site is irregularly shaped and consists of about 2.8 acres. Two concrete tilt-up buildings and gravel parking areas presently occupy the site. The approximate locations of the site structures are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. The northern building is used to store vehicles. The southern building is used as a trucking facility loading dock and warehouse. LTS Trucking and Northwest Gifthouse presently occupy the southern building. We understand that the facility was served by a 10,000 gallon-capacity diesel UST and a 5,000 gallon-capacity gasoline UST. The gasoline UST was located near the southeast corner of the garage building. A gasoline fuel dispenser and vent piping were observed in this area during our site visits. The diesel UST was located near the southeast corner of the warehouse building. A diesel-fuel dispenser and vent piping were observed in this area during our site visits. We understand that these tanks were removed in the late 1980s. We also understand that confirmatory soil samples were not required and therefore not collected at the time the tanks were removed. The precise locations of the former USTs were not known prior to beginning our site excavation activities. SOIL CLEANUP LEVELS Ecology has adopted Method A cleanup levels for petroleum-contaminated soil at typical UST sites. Ecology's recommended analytical tests were used to evaluate compliance with the Method A cleanup levels. Throughout the remainder of this report, the term "cleanup level" will n e o a n g i n c e r i 2 Mc No.5285-001•14l010697 refer to the cleanup level as presented in MTCA Method A(WAC I73-340). The cleanup levels are included in the data tables presented later in this report. SUBSURFACE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS STRATAPROBE BORINGS General Nineteen shallow soil probe borings were completed at the site using TEGs StrataProbe device on Augusit 22 and 23, 1996. The probes were used to define the extent of soil and ground water contamination prior to excavation. Eleven of the 19 probes were completed in the southeastern porI ion of the site(P-1 through P-11)near the reported location of the former diesel • UST, The remaining eight probes (P-12 through P-19)were completed in the northwestern and western portion I of the site near the reported location of the former gasoline UST. Probes P-12 and P-13 were completed within the garage building.The approximate probe locations are shown in Figure 2, The field exploration program is described In Appendix A. Soil Chemical Analysis Soil samples were collected from 16 of the 19 borings. Soil samples were collected from depths ranging from 5 to 5.5 feet below ground surface, near the shallow ground water table. • The soil samples were submitted to TEGs mobile on-site laboratory for analysis of gasoline-and diesel-range hydrocarbons and BETX. A sununary of the soil sample analytical results and the corresponding cleanup levels are presented in Table 1. Laboratory reports and chain-of-custody records arc incl ded in Appendix B. Diesel-range hydrocarbons were detected at a concentration greater than the cleanup level in a soil sample:from P-8, located in the southeastern portion of the site near the former diesel UST. Diesel-range hydrocarbons either were not detected or were detected at concentrations less than the cleanup level in soil samples collected from other borings located in the southeastern portion of the site. Gasoline,riange hydrocarbons exceeding cleanup levels were detected in a soil sample from P-15, located in the western portion of the site near the western property boundary. Gasoline- range hydrocarbons and BETX were not detected in the remaining soil samples'collected from the borings. Ground Water Chemical Analysis Temporary ground water sampling probes were installed in P-1,P-2, P-3 and P-12 through P-19. The temporary ground water sampling probes-consisted well screen and casing. Ground water at the site generally flows in a northern direction at the site property, based on ground water levels measured in the temporary ground water sampling probes. Ground water samples were collected from the sampling points using a peristaltic pump and disposable plastic tubing. Details of the ground water sampling program are included in Appendix A. Ground G e o ll e g i n e s r s 3 Pile No.529S-0O1-141010697 water chemical analytical results and cleanup levels are presented in Table 2. Laboratory reports and chain-of-custody records are included in Appendix B. Diesel-range hydrocarbons were not detected in ground water samples collected from sampling points P-1, P-2 and P-3, located in the southeast portion of the site near the former diesel UST. Gasoline-range hydrocarbons in excess of cleanup levels were detected in ground water samples from sampling points P-18 and P-19, located in the northeast portion of the site near the former gasoline UST. Benzene in excess of the cleanup level was also detected in the P-19 ground water sample. Xylene was detected,in excess of the cleanup level in the P-15 ground water sample. Gasoline-range hydrocarbons and BETX either were not detected or were detected at concentrations less than cleanup levels in the other water samples. REMEDIAL SOIL EXCAVATIONS General Remedial excavation activities were completed by Glacier Environmental Services of • Mukilteo, Washington between August 22 and 29, 1996. Glacier Environmental is registered • with Ecology to perform tank closures. One exploratory excavation and three remedial soil excavations were completed at the site. The approximate locations of the excavations are shown on Figure 2. The excavation dimensions and confirmatory soil sample locations are shown on Figures 3, 4 and 5. Our field sampling procedures are described in Appendix A. Chemical analyses of soil and water samples were performed using a mobile laboratory operated by TEt3 of Lacey, Washington. Soil chemical analytical results are summarized in Tables 3, 5 and 6, The analytical results for ground water samples from the excavations are summarized in Table 4. Laboratory reports and QAIQC(quality assurance/quality control) data are contained in Appendix B. • Gasoline UST Dispenser and Pipeline Excavation Exploratory and remedial activities were conducted in the reported area of the former gasoline UST between August 22, and August 23, 1996. The approximate dimensions of excavations completed in this area are shown on Figure 3. Chemical analytical data for soil and ground water samples collected'in this area arc presented in Tables 3 and 4, Laboratory reports are presented in Appendix B. An exploratory excavation was completed in the reported location of the former gasoline UST to a depth of 8 feet east of the southeast corner of the garage building. Two to three feet of fill over native fine to medium sand with silt and sandy gravel was encountered in the exploratory excavation. Ground water-was encountered at an approximate depth of six feet below grade in the excavation. The gasoline UST did not appear to be located in this area based on soil conditions encountered in the exploratory excavation. Petroleum impacted soil was not encountered in the exploratory excavation based on field screening. Soil sample GU-1 and ground water sample E-1 were collected from the excavation. Gasoline and BETX either were GeoEngineers 4 Pilo No.5755-001.141O10697 - not detected in the samples or were detected at concentrations less than cleanup levels. The exploratory ex avation was backfilled with excavated soil on August 22, 1996. The gasoline dispenser and product piping were removed by Glacier on.August 22, 1996. About 10 cubic yards of soil were removed from the area beneath the dispenser. Confirmatory soil samples (GU-2 through GU-7) were collected, from the excavation sidewails and base. Gasoline-range'hydrocarbons and BETX were not detected in samples GU-2 through GU-6. Gasoline-range hydrocarbons, benzene and xylene were detected in sample GU-7 at concentrations greater than the cleanup levels. Soil sample GU-7 was collected directly beneath the location of the former gasoline dispenser. Further excavation in this location could not be completed without undermining the garage building. Soil removed from this excavation was stockpiled on plastic. A trench, about 3 feet in depth, was excavated,to expose and remove the product and vent piping. The product and vent piping extended about 36 feet east of the Iocation of the gasoline dispenser to the former location of the UST. Soil;excavated from the trench was stockpiled nearby. Two soil samples, T-1 and T-2, were collected from the base of the trench. Gasoline- range hydrocarbons were detected at concentrationsllless than the cleanup level in samples T 1 " and T-2. BETX were not detected in samples T-1 and T-2. Pill consisting of gravelly sand with btick and,concrete fragments, and metal piping was encountered to a depth of about 8 feet below ground surface north of where the product and vent piping terminated. We interpret this area to be the location of the former gasoline UST. The gasoline UST excavation was completed to a depth of about 10 feet below grade on August 23, 1996. The approximate dimensions of the gasoline UST excavation are shown on Figure 3. Soil removed from the excavation was segregated into separate stockpiles based on field screening Petroleum-impacted soil was stockpiled with soil removed from the excavation completed beneath the gasoline fuel dispenser. Eleven confirmatory soil samples (GU-8 through GU-19) were collected from the excavation sidewalls and base. The approximate sample locations are shown in Figure 3. Gasoline-rangei hydrocarbons and BETX either were not detected or were detected at concentrations less than cleanup levels in samples GU-8 through GU-19. A ground water sample (E-2)was collected from the excavation on August 23, 1996. Gasoline-range hydrocarbons were not detected in,the ground water simple. Benzene was detected at a concentration greater than the cleanup level in ground water sample E-Z. Composite soil samples were collected from the soil stockpiles on August 22, 23, and 27, 1996 for analysis prior to disposal. Sample SP-1A,was obtained from soils removed from the exploratory excavation.-Sample SP-2 was collected from.soil excavated from the product piping trench. Sample SP-3 was collected from clean soil,based on field screening,excavated from the gasoline UST'excavation. Oasoline and BBTX either were not detected or were detected at concentrations less than cleanup levels in the three samples. The soil from the exploratory excavation, pipe trench and clean soil from the UST excavation was used as backfill in the excavations on August 23, 1996, a e o E a g i ra e e r l 5 File No.S255-001-t4/010697 j Composite soil samples SP-1B and SP-1C were collected from soil removed from the gasoline UST excavation and the fuel dispenser excavation. Gasoline,toluene and xylenes were detected in sample SP-1B at concentrations less than cleanup levels. Gasoline was detected in sample SP-IC at a concentration exceeding the cleanup level. BETX and lead either were not detected or were detected at concentrations less than cleanup levels in sample SP-IC. Soil from the gasoline UST and dispenser excavations, approximately 30 cubic yards in volume, was removed from the site for disposal. Glacier completed backfilling the excavations with imported soil on August 24, 1996. West Property Line Excavation Gasoline-range hydrocarbons were detected in a soil sample collected front soil probe boring P-I5. A remedial excavation was completed in the vicinity of boring P-15 on August 27, 1996. The approximate location of the excavation is shown on Figure 2. Soil was excavated to an approximate depth of 8.5 feet. Three to four feet of fill consisting of sandy gravel with silt, bricks and wood over native grey fine to medium sand was encountered in the excavation. The approximate dimensions of the excavation are shown on Figure 4. About 60 cubic yards of soil were removed from the excavation and stockpiled on plastic. Twelve confirmatory soil samples (DU-1 through DU-12)were collected from the excavation sidewalls and base. The samples were submitted to TEG for analysis of gasoline- diesel- and heavy oil-range hydrocarbons and halogenated hydrocarbons, Samples collected from the west and north excavation sidewalls(DU-2, DU-4, DU-9 and DU-12)contained mineral spirit and/or heavy oil- range hydrocarbons at concentrations greater than cleanup levels for these analytes. It was not possible to extend the excavation to the north without undermining the garage building, and to the west without crossing onto neighboring property. Gasoline-, mineral spirit-, diesel-, heavy oil-range hydrocarbons and halogenated hydrocarbons were not detected or were detected at concentrations less than cleanup levels in the remaining samples from this excavation. A summary of chemical analytical data for the limits of this excavation is presented in Table 5, Laboratory reports and chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix B. A ground water sample (B-3) was obtained from the excavation on August 28, 1996. The sample was submitted for analysis of gasoline-, mineral spirit-, diesel- and heavy oil-range hydrocarbons. Chemical analytical results for the water sample are presented in Table 3. Gasoline-range hydrocarbons were detected at a concentration(2.7 mg/1 (milligrams per liter]) exceeding the cleanup level in the sample. Mineral spirit-range hydrocarbons were detected at a concentration less than the cleanup level. Diesel-and heavy oil-range hydrocarbons were not detected. A liner consisting of 5-mil thick visqueen plastic was placed on the west, north and south sidewalls of the excavation prior to backfilling. The liner was placed to limit the potential for contamination of backfilled soils. Glacier backftlled the excavation with imported soil on August 29, 1996. d e o II n 8 i n c e r : 6 Pilo No.5285-001-14/010697 Diesel UST Excavation Remedial excavation activities in the vicinity of the former diesel UST were completed on August 29, 1996. The approximate location of the excavation relative to the site is shown on Figure 2. The:excavation was completed to an appri xitnate depth of 10 feet. Fill consisting of loose to medium dense sand with gravel was encountered in the excavation above native fine to medium sand. I Glacier removed the former diesel dispenser and vent and product piping. The approximate dimensions of the excavation'are shown on Figure 5. Approximately 100 cubic yards If soil were removed from the excavation on August 29, 1996. Seventeen confirmatory foil samples (DT-1 through DT-17) were collected from the base and sidewalls of the excavation. The samples were submitted to TEGs mobile laboratory for diesel- and heavy oil-range hydrlocarbon analysis. The chemical analytical data is summarized in Table 6. Samples collected from the west sidewall of the excavation adjacent to the existing building contained diesel-range hydrocarbons at concentrations greater than the cleanup level. It was not possible to excavate further in this direction without compromising the stability of the warehouse building. Soil removed from the excavation was segregated into two stockpiles based on field i screening. Composite soil samples (SP-4, SP-5A and SP-5B) were collected from each stockpile - and were submitted to TEG for analysis of diesel) and heavy oil-range hydrocarbons. Diesel- 1 and heavy oil-range hydrocarbons were not detected in soil sample (SP-4) collected from the _., "clean" stockpile. Diesel- and heavy-oil range hydrocarbons were detected at concentrations greater than,cleanup levels in composite soil samples (SP-5A and SP-5B) collected from the stockpile of'contaminated soil. The clean stockpile was used to backfill the excavation. The contaminated soil stockpile was removed from the site for disposal. i J CONCLUSIONS Glacier Environmental Services removed approximately 185 cubic yards of petroleum- contaminated soil from the subject site between August 23 and August 29, 1996. The contaminated soil was transported to the Rabanco solid waste transfer station in Seattle for disposal. Limited areas of petroleum-contaminated soil remain on the subject property. Gasoline- contaminated soil remains along the southern edge of the garage building in the western portion -A ' of the site., StrataProbe borings P-12 and P-13 were completed within the garage building about 25 feet and 12 feet north of the Gasoline UST, Dispenser and Pipeline,finds West Property collected �i excavation respectively. petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected from borings P-12 and P-13. The petroleum contaminated soil in the no e�ationlls s of of ththe excavations does-not appear to extend beneath the garage building to the to borings. Petroleum contaminated soil extends off-site, west of the West Property Line ;h r excavation. Diesel-contaminated soil remains alang'the eastern edge of the warehouse building in the eastern portion of the site. Removal of soil from these areas was not possible without compromising the structural integrity of the buildings. StrataProbe borings were not completed 'd 7 Flle No.5785-001-L41010697 a p o fi n g i n e e r , within the warehouse building west of the Diesel UST excavation. Therefore, the extent of contaminated soil beneath the warehouse building is presently unknown. Gasoline-range hydrocarbons were detected in ground water samples collected from P-15, P-18 and P-19 at concentrations slightly exceeding MTCA Method A cleanup levels. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by Castagno Brothers Trust. This report may be made available to regulatory agencies. This report is not intended for use by others and the information contained herein is not applicable to other sites. Our interpretations of subsurface sail conditions are based on field observations and chemical analytical data. It is always possible that areas with contamination exist in portions of the sites that were not explored. Within the Iimitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty, express or implied, should be understood. 0 ► -_ We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to Castagno Brothers Trust on this project. Please call if you Have questions regarding this report or other aspects of the project. Respectfully submitted, GcoEngineers, Inc. ‘(/ William E. Halbert Senior Hydrogeologist 12 4 John H. Biggane Principal WEHat1B:vc Document ID:5285001R.R aooSngtncers 8 File No.5285-001.14/010697 ...................... .....::.............. . - PRC)POSEDFC?R: :....<:..::. • .;,:RLI�T'T'ON.COIL:;:.SPRY NG:::COMP Y . • FOR CHUCK PEPKA PREPARED BY TOUMA ENGINEERS 6632 SOUTH 191ST PLACE, E-102 KENT, WA. 98032 (425) 251-0665 RECEIVED AUG 2 5 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON 4'y1L 1.L'l-k `1�•f1i'.�� it.7L. =�7 LL - +.r VJ!' ..z - __ �- • $'iT �Tse .... •` - E '/z -I9 -23- 5 • R.. NTONIIf 336 . . _ ► - 1_ - i i _ i ._i. .!._.1---- �B` ._ S.- -NTH ST � VQC7�',�VE 17 co ..' .fir>�\ SSAQDAN..L AI/70 �RlIGN/ 22 h1 �. • 0. -- . CA'5TAGN0'.B gs? INC,.'• ' '' (�I f�—'�0- • N A f�.Z. 4..: •. Cl h � � --i--it\_; k.---1-1.---i `\p.go • i \/' ]G� V ':25.', . •8 p,�( '. QI 41 I` 9 4I L -,,, \ ic• it R\GNP O V. P G L. I m6�I• II `� )R-oHERN, 1__16 ST. BRA° / - �51 op a (2) I • 1 758.E , r- `1 r--... l , OUTDOOR 1 60�1 i , (a SW/TL-Hm6 STATIQN I I I1 ; - , I —�--; n /•I I I I 1I 1 7R ) P' I i I f I J p`I ---2 PUGET SOUND POWER & I Co) - ,e Y, I LIGHT CO d /�' 1f I I I p 5//. rl SUB ST, 7/0N, ' /' . 1 / I / /Teo 1 , 11 y�.i 1 . I : : P o Q; _ 1.L.91 _I--*r--1-- - - - r c 90. 1 ',_ MA' I_. / 4 I S.P. 009-87 ,. "k.L I IERMSI 1-. 15.38Ac. L11 I €!;. _ 1 e/ra %L.E3 679.31 Q :313-9- 9r10 I s b S. RENTON V l L L•Q. F PL . :SERA„E�ROAo o l l I I •a OVA -T / _�^ 2 3 4 5 / _- 7 8 9 1 10 II I �'•" — I - t, r8- \IN.: f;._ �`o,� N. c .ram CR p551 � -• I s I N • .-:OVER Rp55 Z :./. , c �r�q .`�N > ti OBERC ,�; NARRATIVE Any storm facilities improvements to this site will be designed to the King County Surface Water Design Manual Standards as adopted by the City of Renton. Anticipated right of way improvements include, sidewalk installation and landscaping. The anticipated lot improvements include roof downspout collection and surface water collection, and conveyance facilities . Temporary erosion/sedimentation control facilities will be designed and utilized during the site construction phase . Typically the Temporary erosion facilities contain a rock construction entrance, sediment ponds, filter fence, and hydro seeding. Biofiltration on this site is not anticipated as less than 5000 square feet of new impervious surfacing subject to vehicular traffic will be installed. UPSTREAM ANALYSIS There are no upstream areas that transmit runoff onto this site. DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS This entire area has been urbanized for some time . The existing site runoff to the adjacent conveyance system will not be altered significantly. The City has recently improved the downstream pipe system which has helped some of the historical neighborhood high water situations . These downstream improvements have made the conveyance system less prone to overtopping and damaging adjacent properties . SUMMARY During the site visit and inspection we did not observe any water course erosion or flooding. The anticipated site improvements and connection to the Cities Conveyance system should not significantly impact any surrounding right of way or property. Page - 2 LEVEL - 1 ANALYSIS INTRODUCTION This project involves a parcel of land in south Renton at the southwest corner of Talbot Road South and South 7th Street . The area of this parcel is 2 . 78 acres and lies in the NE 1/4 of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. There are two existing buildings on the site. The existing site is covered with impervious surfaces consisting of asphalt paving, and well cemented gravel, used by heavy trucks for many years . The City of Renton Aquifer Protection Zone Classification map does not cover this area, so indicates no classification. Domestic water is existing to the site . Water main extension is expected, for a fire hydrant and building fire sprinkler system construction. Sanitary sewer is available to the site with systems located in the adjacent streets . The existing soil type, according to the USDA Soil Conservation Service' s King County Soil Survey, is classified as Urban Land (UR) . The soil is generally fill ranging from 3 feet to 12 feet thick. It is a gravelly sandy loam to gravelly loam. REVIEW OF RESOURCES 1 . City of Renton Aquifer Protection Map 2 . City of Renton Topographic Mapping, Scale 1"=200 ' 3 . Soil Conservation Service Map . 4 . City of Renton Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances . FIELD INSPECTION The site was visited in July of 1997, to determine the location and disposition of any storm drainage facilities on and around the proposed site. The parcel topography is quite flat, with two yard drains on the north portion of the site. These yard drains collect surface runoff and direct it storm drain facilities located in South 7th Street . The storm drain facilities in South 7th Street consist of a 24" cmp main collecting runoff from various catch basins and cross pipes . The existing 24" pipe, which is 4 . 5 ' deep, directs runoff westerly in a series of pipe about 1 . 5 mile to the P-1 channel . This site composed almost entirely of impervious roof, asphalt, and hard packed gravel surfaces, will not increase any runoff to any downstream pipe system. We do not anticipate the need to install any runoff control devices or detention facilities for this proposed site renovation. Page - 1 1 j 11S .,:•V6 • •• •0• 11 esv �c�� • vW. II\• I = 111 •add ��-9E! •-v— ZE \� • I a :IN I� I V: awv •• r• . e Yo 1 a ;• . !d "I I ... I I�j ,ri▪z .\\ .• • ... , :: awv • ;: I+ _ •� fatt • ▪ J II[! +�. .•f3�d •LA 146i wg °M' 1 I o \ — nd I� �d t I _I•I IFmI \� \ .; � li as • �, a�V W ; ; 1I0� •� Oil-IV I M rli OSVI I5v I - ., I i ___N ,...:% a3v ▪' ' 6Z wel .e_ _ :\ 0' sz 111(, I t n ii L-L---____c_____\< Ill 1 I . .. . . •• Ali --,[]IrII:I rk —; N 4. ; nl °s I "7 ^d =--=\i (I1: '=a•.lJ i ‘' L L'it ' 11°Al 5 a ❑ • I �Ir . d ,\4I ¢ L,J afl Il 1 -_ iI,II ,_ _ ;I __•- 6Z I ;;� • j v._ r 1l //JJ---� • I Q�d1 I .r•:°. • ,�• in , ==l ill 13 ;�1 11 __- - 1P. ▪. ( ""(-- .t u) 2 - -) 01 .' y !DJIiii1;11, nd L.I. _ • SI■. 1 l ,n ■I■ill d L • •11 bli.....--- 4 : . .. F-Wdl .. 1 ii-/-‘.. ....... i _ ...,-. get/N-- A . ! :•• ', .•:. 91 11::__ ____- - . .▪ . .......- „., , II ... 41 .' .1 '�f� �I I0w l eisGn$ - `.. ° II: " �• 01 i - •ds!a*41; .�\ �' `�i P•, I 1 II • •Ma \\ Ad • C.11 dd �� 'I. I a I^ -!, - - 1. -N- \ • �wV �_ � II as/no Hop • Ad - ---r- \iii-jos y • • • / • y. 1 , ili 1 .----\., EN WAIF om 1:------ 1111 .. . 0 :. :II.' 7- : - ..).41:Li \a•t.g• ., ';'" -r-":'-z--•-_-----...,_ ___,...iiip 1)1,1 a) V : 111611 , 1;•• __--.--------------- / ./.:771L,t`-, .,_. om .--, wireum••----,Q.,....„,.. 1 J 4 V k • 4 co / ,,,, , ......., , 0.• I .n � f II / - �. I +, mob y � � 1 r�+fi II: [ir°.7 �:';jr%° ;�� •-� nl ovoa da'/�'y6 • b \ i r/ iiir 1.- Alf .d�IV �. /dill,oz. I♦, .• .. •boa' 000 oil „ ,,,ji zwEcie\'‘,1.. _‘.,.:_rti 0 _...../.* 4 ..‘ Fl4.,,, , c, iii.,, , ::._,,,...„... ....,:,,,.:. ,,,,. .„,. ,......- • /,.:.„, 8: wad . \ ickalase: 1 tt . .,, "� T .:,._._____•,___..... ,.,..:. I Flo�i�\!:a� �' `r::i r _ 1��� ' �� \ . . .i , ,.: . .„ :\ ;� •^ //�, ( ' Ill ` ` —I�I®• .'��00 •�aa _ Y — - a�I' • \ an3 U �-' + liali: I \ Wa Ly;y� \•- .++ 1( I II / Ii �-� I• , • OO IMI .. 4 - - -- ---- / _I ' I / p L mop • •7�`• r rrr` —. t, ,......„.„.:r:: ,.j• �,�� 8 ��— : itFA% \\L < •� _' .• �,, W • • • N 176,-. • �� _ t._ ST _/ ---/ \- _ \- 1 / N 175,934 -22 X -- 7_ _ 423 ----- 4 - -S --___`� !' E. 1.f.g(;,5� ^.` S II❑ ❑ 0 J 5�.T _,,, 1- ,/ - .• I 11-17. n C ' �x22 /� . / II r/ X I� / ,) 1 -------. , .' 11 j . . / X19 NJ 1` X 21 t f_ .,� , 1; I I �. r' �- -_ ' ; II I j1=2 „,� 4., X 2�''� „.... ,,, ` ----' I I I . opp ,i,t,..- ,•,,4 X 19 /�� r y X25 -- 1 ..r✓r^ X 2 1 ^ / / ) X ` ‘ ` �30 t ',` it • _.ram . t • - 1 SN . , / • • 24 j _- �K ++ x x _x, I ...ram i , —_ — f_ k TREES ■I i 1 -.�' b I • Its , •} bR;ISlil 1[1 _ —— - ---J r j L ' i x ... i 1 ? 25r i L.._x X19 S [ : [ ] XL.i L 1 Jx . t i Sw1 ' r-" X24 I : r , , ' - - , / 1 1 ,f)- ----------- 2 t` •• • _ _ _ 2.5 -. - i 2 __ 5 I ; , / t7 h J' I. ' r• - r� 3 X i r •,. .�. a i •, -'' I r .. \,.... •-./:... . H h /. \ ,4 O `r•' ys r N �' K 1 / 1 I kdipp r�^ i r , _ ! I 'ct / /1' - 21 ,X, _ L. ! J _ • 11 / ,ii() J ' • I , 1 crn i L :. j } + • 1- J /1. .• 1 1 l / i I I KING COUNTY, W /__ _-IINGTON, SURFACE WA R DESIGN MANUAL (2) CN values can be area weighted when they apply to pervious areas of similar CN's (within 20 CN points). However, high CN areas should not be combined with low CN areas (unless the low CN areas are less than 15% of the subbasin). In this case, separate hydrographs should be generated and summed to form one hydrograph. - FIGURE 3.5.2A HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP OF THE SOILS IN KING COUNTY HYDROLOGIC HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP GROUP* SOIL GROUP GROUP* Alderwood C Orcas Peat D Arents, Alderwood Material C .Oridia D Arents, Everett Material - B Ovall C Beausite C Pilchuck - C Bellingham D Puget B Briscot D Puyallup - Buckley D Ragnar - B Coastal Beaches Variable Renton D Earimont Silt Loam D Riverwash Variable Edgewick C Salal C Everett • A/13 'Sammamish D Indianola A Seattle D Kitsap C Shacar D Klaus C Si Silt C Mixed Alluvial Land Variable Snohomish D Neilton A Sultan C Newberg B Tukwila D Nooksack C Urban Variable Normal Sandy Loam D Woodinville u HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS A. (Low runoff potential). Soils having high infiltration rates, even when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of deep,well-to-excessively drained sands or gravels. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. B. (Moderately low runoff potential). Soils having moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of moderately fine to moderately coarse textures. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. C. (Moderately high runoff potential). Soils having slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine to fine textures. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. D. (High runoff potential). Soils having very slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a hardpan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material. These soils 1 • have a very slow rate of water transmission. * From SCS,TR-55, Second Edition,June 1986, Exhibit A-1. Revisions made from SCS, Soil Interpretation Record, Form #5, September 1988. g�� 3.5.2-2 11/92 /ISh1tflh1tllhiSPPIflh1SIflfflP8flY PROGRESS REPORT 1. Company goals • RCS goal to be the high technology leader of the spring industry • to provide a good clean safe working environment for our employees 2. Overall status • Renton Coil Spring Co. started in Renton in 1948 by Ray Pepka • the company is in it's third location now at 325 Burnett N • in June of 1992 the company was purchased by Chuck Pepka 3. Location • The RCS building is at 325 Burnett N • RCS space is total 14,600 SF shop main floor: 10,000 SF mezzanine storage: 2,600 SF office: 2,000 SF • RCS is a good corporate neighbor 4. Sales progress • Renton Coil Spring is growing at a rate in excess of 22%per year in the previous two years • the 1996-1997 fiscal year will end June 30 and will end with a 40% increase; annual shipping will be in excess of$6 million 5. We're meeting our goals • RCS currently is the largest supplier of titanium springs to the space, aircraft, and automotive racing industries • RCS has used a process called the theory of constraints to improve the through-put of it's manufacturing system 6. Continued sales growth for RCS • The RCS sales team is continuing to expand sales • RCS 1997-1998 fiscal year should be 7million+ • RCS employment for this period should show growth to around 60 employees 7. Long term sales: Status • RCS sales are diverse with only 35% direct to Boeing • RCS is a world wide supplier of high technology springs • RCS exports to Canada, UK, France, Italy, Israel, Indonesia, Japan, Sweden, Holland, and Germany 8. Key issues • RCS sustained growth has brought the need for more space • RCS would like to stay in Renton and be a good corporate citizen • RCS has added 12 new jobs this year and will soon require 10 more 9. Concerns for future • manufacturing space is RCS's main concern • there is a very limited amount of space in Renton left for manufacturing • rapid growth has moved RCS's plans forward 10. Next steps • 1998 RCS will celebrate 50 years in Renton • RCS needs more manufacturing space for growth • RCS needs help from the chamber and the city to grow • RCS will continue to track progress, and report 9039.doc COLD FORMING OF TITANIUM ROUNDS AND FLATS by CHARLES PEPKA RENTON COIL SPRING CO. THE MANUFACTURE OF SPRINGS AND SHEET METAL COMPONENTS IS CHANGING EACH YEAR. EXOTIC MATERIALS OF THE 60'S AND 70,S ARE NOW COMMON, AND NEW MATERIALS ARE COMING TO THE MARKET YEARLY . FORMABILITY OF MATERIALS HAS BEEN A MAJOR CONCERN, AND COLD FORMABILITY AT RENTON COIL, SPRING IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTORS IN PRODUCTION. COLD FORMING OF TITANIUM ROUNDS AND FLATS WILL COVER,MATERIALS, TYPES OF SPRINGS, FORMING,MODULUS, MECHANICAL PROPERTIES AND CHANGES DURING THE FORMING OPERATION ROUND WIRE SPRINGS THE MATERIAL SIZE RANGE FOR COLD FORMING "BETA C" WIRE (AMS 4957) IS FROM .009 IN. TO .5 IN. DIAMETER . THIS IS LIMITED BY THE DRAW SIZE OF STARTING STOCK. THE TITANIUM BAR(AMS 4958)RANGE FROM .375 IN. TO 2.5 IN. DIA. THIS IS THE STA CONDITION OF"BETA C". SHEET MATERIALS IN 15-3-3-3 (AMS 4914)SIZE RANGE FROM .002 IN. TO .75 IN. 15-3- 3-3 NORMALLY IS USED IN SIZES UP TO .125 IN. BEFORE THE PRODUCTION PHASE BEGINS, RENTON COILS SPRING'S ENGINEERING STAFF HAS CONSULTED ON THE DESIGN, COMPLETED A COMPUTER MODEL OF THE SPRING, AND CHECKED FINISH REQUIREMENTS . COMPUTER MODELING IS USED THOUGH OUT THE PRODUCTION PROCESS. DESIGN PROBLEMS ARE FIXED BEFORE ACTUAL PRODUCTION BEGINS. SPRINGS FROM LARGE L—-v ETER BAR STOCK /- • �.�. _i. . . � �K yiy ir -.aver rs {, <3ti. t:. .. `� 'C �._. F c,-°-.:• dui . __��.A. • . -, r:rim' '' • • :r fi , • TYPES OF SPRINGS COLD FORMED FROM ROUND WIRE OR BAR . COMPRESSION EXTENSION TORSION I TORSION BARS WIRE FORMS . • COMPRESSION SPRINGS ARE THE MOST COMMON COLD WORKED TITANIUM SPRING. EXTENSION AND TORSION SPRINGS ARE COILED AND LEGS OR HOOKS ARE FORMED. TORSION BARS AND WIRE FORMS ARE FORMED PER PRINT jREQUIREMENTS . 'I. THE MODULUS OF EACH TITANIUM ALLOY IS SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT. IT IS NORMAL FOR TITANIUM SPRINGS TO HAVE ABOUT 1/2 THE COILS OF STEEL SPRINGS 1 THE MODULUS OF TITANIUM E G X=10^6 BETA C TI 3-8-6-4- 14.5 5.6 LCB TI 6.8-4.5-1.5 16.4 6.3 I TI 15-3-3-3 15.5 • I ROUND WIRE SPRINGS USE THE SPRING INDEX AS A FORMING LIMIT . THE MINIMUM DIAMETER LIMIT COMES FROM THE MANDREL SIZE BEING SMALLER THAN THE WIRE SIZE . THE OUTER LIMIT COMES FROM PRACTICAL LIMITS OF COILERS AND STABILITY OF SPRINGS. THE EFFECT OF THE SPRING INDEX ON FORMING IS THAT THE SMALLER THE SPRING INDEX THE GREATER THE SECTION CHANGE DURING COILING. THE POWER REQUIREMENTS IN COILING ARE MUCH HIGHER FOR SMALL INDEX SPRINGS . SPRING INDEX MEAN SPRING DIAMETER WIRE DIAMETER MINIM INDEX >= 3 MAXIMUM <=22 SPRING-BACK DURING COILING OF COLD WOUND SPRINGS. SPRING-BACK AFTER FORMING IS CAUSED BY TITANIUM'S LOW MODULUS AND HIGH TENSILE STRENGTH. WHEN FORMING, THE FINAL DIAMETER OF A SPRING IS ALWAYS LARGER THAN THE MANDREL USED FOR COILING. IN RENTON COIL SPRING'S MANUFACTURING PROCESS THE USE OF COMPUTER MODELING CAN PREDICT THE STARTING MANDREL SIZE . THIS PREDICTION IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE VARIATIONS LARGER THAN 3% CAUSE US TO LOOK AT THE WIRE FOR PROBLEMS. DURING THE MANUFACTURE OF SPRINGS IT IS IMPORTANT TO GET THE EARLIEST TEST OF UNIFORM PROPERTIES OF THE MATERIAL. DURING THE COILING PROCESS, A LARGE VARIATION IN DIAMETER WOULD INDICATE SIGNS OF TENSILE CHANGES IN THE MATERIAL. SPRING-BACK DURING COILING OF COLD WOUND SPRINGS Da = ARBOR DIAMETER q = UTS. OF WIRE E = MODULUS OF ELASTICITY d = WIRE DIAMETER OD = OUTSIDE DIAMETER DA = 1.02d d / ( OD - d ) + 1.85q /E THE SPRING RATE CAN BE DETERMINED USING THE FOLLOWING FORMULA. SPRING RATE CAN ALSO BE MODELED IN THE COMPUTER AND COMPARED WITH ACTUAL RESULTS FOR AN ADDITIONAL OVER CHECK ON MATERIAL PROPERTIES. ONCE A TEST IS MADE SPRING RATE IS CORRECTED BY CHANGING THE ACTIVE NUMBER OF COILS. SPRING RATE d = WIRE SIZE D = MEAN DIAMETER G = MODULUS TORSION N =ACTIVE COILS RATE = Gd4 , 8D3 n DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR SHAPED WIRE COIL SPRINGS FOR SOME APPLICATIONS THERE IS A NEED FOR NON-ROUND SECTIONS . THE PRODUCTION OF SHAPED WIRE PRESENTS SOME UNIQUE PROBLEMS . THE QUALITY OF STARTING STOCK HAS TO BE CLOSELY CONTROLLED, AND THERE IS ONLY LIMITED SCALE REMOVAL. CROSS SECTIONS OF THE MATERIAL HAVE TO BE FACTORED INTO THE DESIGN, BECAUSE OF KEYSTONING DURING THE COILING PROCESS . RECTANGULAR MATERIAL CAN BE COILED ON EDGE (HARD WAY) OR ON FLAT (EASY WAY) . ENVELOPE REDUCTION IS THE MAIN REASON TO GO TO NON-ROUNDS . AS AN EXAMPLE TORSION SPRINGS CAN BE MANUFACTURED WITH A SHORTER OVERALL LENGTH . THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF A KEYSTONE SECTION IN A RECTANGULAR WIRE, FROM A SPRING COILED ON EDGE (HARD WAY).THE MOUNT ON THE TOP SIDE IS THE STARTING SECTION . THE SECTION ON THE BOTTOM IS AFTER COILING . NOTE THE CHANGES, WITH THE WIDEST AREA BEING THE INSIDE DIAMETER OF THE SPRING . THIS VIEW ALSO SHOWS CROWNING IN THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE DIAMETERS . THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH ALL BENDING IN RECTANGULAR AS WELL AS FLAT MATERIALS. THIS KEYSTONING CHANGES THE SHAPE AWAY FORM THE SIMPLE BEAM STRESS FORMULA. j ' 4 ... • • • .was } i FLAT SPRINGS OUT OF TI. 15-3-3-3 FLAT SPRINGS MANUFACTURED OUT OF 15-3-3-3 SHEET OR STRIP MATERIALS ARE USED IN MANY COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT . THE USE OF 15-3-3-3 HAS ALLOWED RENTON TO COLD FORM SOME VERY COMPLICATED SHAPES. THERE IS FORMABILITY DOWN TO A 2T RADIUS. FLAT PARTS ARE ALSO BEING FORMED ON AUTOMATIC 4 SLIDE MACHINES. STAMP AND FORM • . PARTS ARE REPLACING NY STEEL AND STAINLESS STE_PARTS WITH IMPROVED PERFORMANCE AND LESS WEIGHT. IN MANY DESIGNS TITANIUM CAN RUN WITH NO SECONDARY FINISH, ONLY STAMP AND FORM. THIS METHOD HAS MANY ADVANTAGES WHEN COMPARED TO THE COST OF FINISHING STEEL PARTS. THERE IS GOOD COMPATIBILITY OF TITANIUM WITH GRAPHITE EPDXY COMPOSITES .THE EXPECTED WEIGHT SAVING IN SMALL FLAT PARTS WOULD BE 33.%LIGHTER THAN STEEL . 15-3-3-3 MATERIAL PROPERTIES ST : UTS 102-130 KSI YS 100-121 KSI %E 1 2 MIN STA: UTS 150 KSI MIN YS 140 KSI MIN % E 7 MIN SPRINGS MANUFACTURED OUT OF TITANIUM 15-3-3-3 ' . • ' " ' : • •;,04. • • s:g • ' 1 7:•;:t, VfVqc _ •-- - s'" ' 4.; r:CS eji'aI. 4; • • -,„ .i..•!•;4.1.4,1,,,...„.-,-.:•;••••:• • . FLAT SPRING TYPES SPIRAL TORSION , POWER(CLOCK TYPE), BEAM, CANTILEVER CONSTANT FORCE, SPRING WASHERS. THIS IS THE ENTIRE RANGE OF FLAT SPRING PRODUCTS. THE SPIRAL TORSION AND POWER SPRINGS ARE USUALLY FORMED FROM STRIP MATERIAL AND THE REST ARE STAMPED AND FORMED . POWER(CLOCK TYPE SPRINGS) OUT OF.15-3-3-3 • . . ... .•, ..... • .„.e.i.•:;.; -•,-;•••---7.•••• ,...- •-- -- ----------- )4,.. ) • • 4-, -;: •-- .-04r•'•--- -- - .::•.----,.-.-,...---, . J!" -.----;.:.;..,- .„,y• -.- . --.-.• A ,--••I--.• -:..a.-.‹ --, ,-f-, d.,.!;:•."• ''• .....---' :. . . . ,•:'••-• • .... .• --'-:;•-- • • ----- --• , -: .4 1 11 • .'F. ..' , • ...'• 1 ' * '1),, *.'.;:: .1...,- "...'• - • Y.:C;j1' !, ... • -- ,, -, • ': • ,..-::' : :..• , . ' ''f- I* - • •'.... .... ' • '-';.'.11.•• •v.:e•••• - • . --- - " ----',---"1----- 1--- Mi•M".. ---- .-.- 7 ;-:;i*T* /' ' --' . - , . . : • ...,7. . • -• . • .' .--.1- .94)11) 4 '''''-V - ,. . . (4i14114'' ) kf.-.. —- • PI' . .....__. • -- .-. :, . '• ---- . ... —- . — ... ... . - •• ___. . -..- . .. L -• .....2_,,,,e; .,... - _ ___.... _ . . • ,...,.... .....,:-.•_::„:„ei-.:,--,-..:-Ik .•... •...•,....‘- . --- --.-.‘,.--t.....t,---',' • ... .. r. .1.- . .. ... •-:-. ..:.-r.'.•„.,.....:....‘4.. .gig, -....-._:„,,,....„:7..._,:•,-,r.,-4,4., .J.:'-...1',..-',.'."`-••,'-,51;!':•-.,.:„,-,.• •••'-!-',.':-','..-,.1.-..,.r--_-:4--ka-r.----- -•, . ....... ''''''-:%44*'-'• 7:44•44"'.-'!...:v.,!.: *.-1-.),.ts ,-‘...,A,.',1-4,; • - ..-- . .c.. -.-.............:-..,-,-:'..; ,..-,- 4-,-,,,•1-,,,t`m4.,-VArd`•' -.4-.:•••-•--'1,-'7,-,0,• •.i.:,-.-.P.,t,-........-.,:".•:-.c,-...:." •. •...-'-:5. . • . "r tP,.:-.','.--,..,.-,Y,,,,:,;!:.,ie..*-.-,,..1'....- ... . .%. - .•-• - _1,,„ ...a.......-• THIS IS A TOOLING PROGRESSION FROM FLAT PATTERN TO FINISH PART ,.•,: ,-.:.-...----5,:,i;•--"....5-,..,:-.-„,-;,,,,z4z•.,,..... -- . ,_,,...,......lps..,..,..- --..:. ...........-.i,it,-•:;7;r4„.„44....7,re• .._ , J. . .,,4.:,-..„,-.,,..-r:::::,.-....„...,-",-„,4,t•7•_,... ..:.:-„so-,•,.„, •,--- 'u-:''':','r:'"'-'.ityt,.::•_1-., 7,1: • .,.0:?t,'44"'F.:-'-?,'F-`,-••'..' ••:,--. -'':':" . -P*- C *1": ."*. '4i,..jstfr4- 7;iee7-^"''' *'*'''''',!;''''' '•*': s'-'''*'l'''''' ..' ,1.!';'U....,....-.,-.';',.- -",,,P.4', ;,VA' .4.7re2.11t..,Y.,' --: *.'4** -' '''.3-7'0'1) • *--"' .--*- — -. '''''14-1-"I'Y'°-''•.174....-•t".......,-'1...',..4'''-q---e..ii=.:'•Aa'-'1- ,...11i--4..-, - •.-••i''.•"-":;,. -• .•... -t.:':....4..,.....tt....,..•,, ,--If.§.. : c--e).•4Tell..:1.4.f;IZA:.t!:',:v.A.1,7•.:7-: :.""•'•".,,..-C.,, :-:.,i11. i74(*P. -..;,:::.-• .:"..':2,-,....-:,•-:=:.f-,..-.....r.4.:5-4-'7,7,,,.•.,Mptv.•.,=,-,pg,-'4-.---1 A.i'' ' -:• *-,: *''..1**•.:/4-;"-Ar4f-C-i1A-7'' ".•1-1111ttrkf*if -,,..'"tAi4‘2:::•.'•-•'.--*Z.-s*.4."":***;.r..! -.1.7,4s'-.:1-1&*'' .-.•;n(I''7,-...... .....:1.:..,,, 1:t..;^.--%i-'.'.-..s..-.:>';: --i,• -•',•4,Z4..pst--pit•=-.',,..,-- ••• - •. -,-•,4,... .•,..i7,v.ii..?,..,•;;;•04..'. .. .1*... .-rd,,,.'-....)-,..,,:.••'.'t-',..,.,..."..-.,;;;:.'"'5..,-..,*.... 7.,,- -'''',2-.'y-!1 _ • -:.,-..-...44;1":17--1,....w,,,r,:i4,.-.,,,,Egii. ''..;4.: -',' 1:',:1-i7.74'.-". '• .:'...';':::"?.•:1".ill''..:- -f• '' .:':•..-,.,i.-.'-,- -46,..-..----,• -414,t:,,..1'1V,-..1 7..'","'-?..k.%,-;•`M4-;11'.-':---''%,er't''''---7.r.-1,-_,.*:,-,•,*,5'.....-, ...,..---•,*:lyi' '*. .4._. ' 77.: .:'....:::',.....,:-...: ,;3..ZY44.?.,,..„..... ,..";.eiS,'''A.13:;4".f.:,Z•1•1-,244,!,.:Filli,..;701.,:. .':.L.:11-..4:::.:I'-'51 -2-tg:.'-/-''.". '1.,,"cf.,,• • ., ... .-.c.1.:.4.-;......,.:'.:-.1.,:,-.-- - -:..,.,-,v;.,..0.27,-,...,,,F4-g....kt. ..,--w...-:-.7".:,..... ;•.:-....,..;•,.4,7,-.,,,.; f.i--::. ••^P.,.- ',.•'- .t.!...-r:Ci74%•"'f. '.---:- ' '.,,-,..V,1":7,,..,-.;11.--.:',.1-;;,$),-;Iff*,.%:-.:',1;:-:v.2:- .-.,,,..,;:4,Q._ .k ,• - •:,.*?^*%:,!,'!:,'7,•;,,:-,"'•','.i-- ''" 4.-'2i.-t.0,,..:. ''''''"''''..*:,4..,* • '''i, :-..^.*-''"7"'.•*.*,-`'P 7-''''''''1"7,' --- 46....."-1**ft;:,f. ....;-: .4,tzl*/...,__H-r-41..."!;?..),..„!‘..,:4'.:-.•.,:. ....'-'.-.-• ;,..!-;,?.V.:‘-; ;;;;`*, -."44'.....419.?J'ek- :::-,:g..,,,,s;:il',.(4,!--,-,.. • t,-,. .4,"V.-_.y,7*.;,iy.f.'r;'..2;,...,::::Ski;•1.?,*-",„..:-.---7,-", -.,..,-------',- .. . .:'.1..1?„,.;-:?.."-';,•'?71‘...-. . .,-49-1,44.i..t.'M'''.*:t"-.•-* * ' :* -',..0-1''"7,A*-,--.=-''''''' ',4,,•z"...,'•57.11-',''':9.''.. . ve:-,--._ s.ve,_s_.•4'.- .•.v.-,5-•.,'..i:,,....;-;:4.'f.'irA%•tv. - , , . ' •``t44.1'',,r;t:-`0,.-,1.-JIL.2,,Y7.t•-•;:-..;•-:-..,1,-4:t-..? "4'.— .. --.'-'7'...-. ,'"•-ti,.::...-f7L-:':..:- '''''. 1-',..ii--";'''Z4-•".;Ii. ' ••XW' -•''''' ""--'‘,'.',:t;li:,•;;;:i--t-E.--"..i-s: • .ft. '-' . * --.,r.."V.42,i,:•. •'',--V.It.- -.7.tit:7-:'' --.'..- ....j'•••'...^=:."7-74;..4...-:.. 7,4•';'•-t-)40...•-• .z...;••:.••:.',...T.L.,,,,,A.,7... --;•41ra&,.trt-';si *:*. • . '4..,„i_s-----.. ....,,..:,,7--;.....:.-e....i._',!':%,..,:‘ . , ,t.... .--",---.114'....-••••••''., • • . • :-,•5,., •.' ._.‘..,-...:7N.7.r,-,fi,',...1;'!:=----,.:.:%,•• ...N. -,..,,..4,-"-:`-'•,".•-•:- - -'. -•• :. :!..4;44...---•4-''' ....-1-• •••••::._. -...0 1 . - . • ------ 'i-',.:Ei•-;-:-.F.-,-:--i;-- . 1 " rez.7.-y,...;,,..i....---.. • ' • -.-: 2'la.4.*;.71.0.,-7.':',.... .'i., •''.. ' '' •:.:!4.,...:"..liyikt,.;4':. . ;..... -';;;..''--- -.,::.%!,;".i`7.4.1."?.:•:',..:34:2,-... .• ..::.),.:--.'',tij..%-i;:-.,.:.:?,.;;;!'e'' ''J:41- -•-•": -'----1:::tF-;•*-t- ---_,:rt`.?':-.1,*!..[PS„::---*:;.- 1 • •; :,I 6. '..,•••6•';' .,.... : -.... . .....•.- ..,:.•;,p,;44....,i.‘... ..••••'.4.-. •. "-..6-4••, '.. •ett-••• •e•.,,7‘..!.;•-•r•v..F.%•!,-,••.i.:e.. ,..,•;,;,-,w. • ..• .• . •... .... ....,-, --...-•:;..2,:•:_ ::„...7..•.n.:::••.•: •:`•-.1-.••.;.- ••:••.-7,t..4. •-•,...;..-:-,•:.'• , '-.;:•• --• --,_-::•.•-•7if,,!•;••••••,,,•••;.:z.-.••••, ...; .•-.•. .,•:. •.... -_••:•.•••...-••••••-•.-t-,:,:,•••.,•••••2..•;_--....a.,-...,,,.•.-;•••::,-•,.„•.:e......:•,:.. ....„,..4„ ..1.-:.-",:i.•:-..-•"-•-:t4,•M:1•••••,:.•gt., -:,::,::,i,•z;i::'-.:: ,..,4-iit:r:..::iff.---i.-. •.,--:- •I'. „;;v• 1k,ri2.."I:71fr4..4•45n-..'Y-.:1•-'.:•i•:•:3I,•'.'•-:r'i f.f..'...:•'•.'=.:•,!•=..::.i...';''._:I'''''',1.•';:•;::•::-`....^.;':i-.:-..:.;f:1...f-....-...-..:.-'_''.•...‘••:.-..•.'::..',1..".,j r.:f,'i.';•.:;.',?•.a......z,i..;.J,. :'i1..::•'=-•,••!-‘•'•-" i c •.•.,••:;•.:c...:..-t,7.••;••.-:,,V..f r1i,!:.•:,,.'..,:-..§ 1 ' j :z.•.t...,,•,t,'.,-..'-.g,.4•m.,...A..,....174.:".f,-.'.:,..i..,i-.-i i'..6-'...- ;...i1,'..::'::,X......•••..•:.•:.'".,..:.._-.. •:i• . - i-.,1.t;'-I:r=...."I4.;;::`:•;...-Z::::' - . ;•:".:••:-.....-:::;..:;_' •.7 .1. •-•; -7,`•.,';.4...":1"- ;',•.r...-:1"V-',.,'-V-_.-.1's.le'.--..,•,-,-:;-7.7 ,,:';'-'•'": - , „_•• ,-;-,...:-:-.i,:',-:.5.::::-s:..L.-,,, ......fi-,...;„-)v,.:1-A-, ,,_- .r....z...-:,,-„:4,:iT=., „...,...„...-:•,.,-...,.:7,-„ ' ,..,-„,,i4t..,,,..z.-,-.•-...-7,:;r4--c-%.::.,..::-.:'.,::•' ..'i'....2;.‘ _ Lf::1 - .- --7--- ,..,,,..4,:.,. .-- ....a ..... ; .....'i:'':';":"''''''. i•,,A,,IY'AVX54t.--:,'''.1:1'.7't 1/4k.a.'...':S.:P.'.‘ 4 . )..-....fga",...,.".., ..,',''.'-.7.1;r:i.'.54.,".;.','-,-'.-,Y...:.',....:is'''.!:.::?;;%.::-;:-.-....,i.,Z:.:.---7-".:•,,,--,1; ''.::.--'..",-:.„.,,i,;,....• .;:g:;:,'?::'?.:,.•-:-,C.'..,,-..-.......4..i.V.."...,Z,:,..4.,:',....,,,:,..-74.... --....fr,:.,:i1--'*••"..Z ,-z,:' . .,'-K -....-,,...•--," :. -....,`-,!......y.'': •..:,...,-7:1, .41*''.5,:;_:33.:-.7:,„_.., ..i1" -, , ,, .,.. ....--...s...1 7.,:i..!..'..'."..•?V.;--:...."-:........:!..''''V.4,:..;•.;-::::in!.•I;;;,:f..;',.. .,,i,'.;,:i';'.'":....././.31 j.:skek7i.52'..'-j,:;.'.;:f;7j.-Tf:',';72"..7.4'4.2f:;14T,11 :5, ;',..::i.::::•'-'ilV't'.."-.....FI.,-,-.'g;i1.4:.;e*,:::..!?,;.:.1..7.:'•A..:S:'.5..ff';!'.'.-i,:i.':--:1''!...,•j. "....... .1.k,':',.-j''..,;.:W:.>S,,..L-e;-r..'t:...-,Lc.t.•:12,,,V:,:IV,'-'4:;:::.',..-..h:',.,.Vt.;;:.:,,,,r.::.t:r.,,;f.;.,.rr.7,:" ',.--..!:'..,-'-',.,?...,,..:•'.•:,:::-....'.:4;...1 .)^,r., -.V.1'C'etAtr'5, ,, .:1; 42.'.e....‘ '.7.,int:,F..1-'..?:,:,,T.4'. ,...''':':r.".. ::',.. ' : ...1-7;.,•-.-,,- ,- ,,,.,,..,;.-,:.,,,.....7•,:s*,!•-.1",-, ..0,-,. .-.T,7.,....',77*:?:'".4f;,...7,1";:::1,.,..V.4?-_--1 .E.:,:,761.;;;;;,,•-,... ,r,,I,t.-.,_*5-;';,:xi,.,Y*Uf:,_';2,.1:-,,!..-.e:,f7,-.W.: ::::'L'P;...,?'-',7'.,'"4-....;.,,q.*:=;',•',--.4..f..:* ...*.'.,;':',.,"*.':_. *••'* ,.'•, :,-Si.'?.:-.--:c:::.i..,:'--:.-*:,;:: .....,,,fg?.::-.J4.4,4",n,sy....r ...t.0,..;*:',...-:-;-,-. 0.44'..:ii .,:- '1*.0i..-!..1?*!•:ti'',*:,.:..:1--7.3,..-1'.,.'::::,**-*-'-e-,,--•*-f,;:**' .....- -,".-Z•7‹:E."-',* ..,.."„r„..%, ....:?-*"...,-;, CUS-7.!::*1*,...;.„-::::--.-.?-_-'tz--,:.4."--a.,---4-e::::!.t'..7.1,1;Jtiv,.'1.:-.44-Aglf-,1,-',. tii---.-_,..0-;.,,,,,....?.--,,,,;..,,-.-- ...-:,,,,..,,,..±:”.:.,,-,-..:,.,:•.,•,:':•,-.?::•,.:- •••••s•-•_:.-'-.....,.,,e.=,,•,:::"...-.-...,,--..7-. .....-„, •,-.....•-..,r,,,....,t,:,::2 Pri,....,.....1.74.,....,...z.6.1.10...."4,ti.3-.4:1.4*.--.31„;_••-+.,,,:te„ ,-.4,=!...:,,,--1,-„It.e.---p-..f.,.....•.,!... ...,-z-i,--,, -.5v-te.; -,i..----!,,,.,:-_-..,-,•,,k--;,-..s.Y.;,:.:•-•.-::,...,:•-•*'-•:-;,.---..,,,,,....75,,,,...::..,..,•.,.......,-.....,--•re,"!,'•:';'-'<.::'"4-•-,',74,..1•;....,;:zs".'•?Z•;:vi-777'.-;'::::)k.,t,r.'. .'-.T4m-;-'..';'..*iint',...1,... .',.:1...4r,.. -ii:fs'.9.,a'''PliFf'.14.2.;Vez,4,-;'57.-.W.'..i.A,P?:',,i'i.'...:.7.!...,,-,..;., =.:..,••';•:•..-..'„.,:.,s-----._",,,,,,,...15.,'-'1*;,;.#:-,•‘:','•!.,%:.:,..••.:.•••',. . .''.::i:,..'f;;:'f-f:V::.':",,':•4't'"''•'7-M?;.g'-'';Z.-.'.•tIV.:--iiR+.fg'k'7'V;.' tW:.4i24W ,Pv.„T, tt,...ae+, '"4-4!-'.-h'1.-‘-4.tt[i.,l'i.,'.:"•-, :!..,4.;.:"-•;:%;•,..:.'-'•••'-.:11 • .3,,,,,.i"5,••.7-.47't:.-. ..•:•';',..;.'-i`i''.,:11'.•.:,' .:•,.?.i".•'.';',,,•:•:/::%;';';.:17.s.711f;•.,: i.-.4`.c.,.74.e.F.',45 ,4:-...re...4;;7.1-•-r.lie.,7.-. ••Wg3T/41. .,4-F/17.•:?..Vs.,-."--.43-ire::-`''''''''''-L.-:-..'-'1*..,..:„.,,-i.:5.4.•'- .:::CY:i:•7.;''...:::::...?',•'..... •• . .•••.•.•••• •z.•;-,q::e',. .1,1'.,vg-.:".,'.1V.-.90--tv.'resi-,.:1,..,..-Nirriis7;e44,:t!-:..-.•-,n•le,':&:.,.;gf.r.V.,...*---'•-.7. .'2..:..4;''''''''.''',.4'::.i.P4V.;,'''-'::',''''''..'''''....''..'''• . ..:-.`---,f,":1,-.i,-,F,".,L,-,,,,,'S':,,,..--,4---‘...„4 y..7;..."-te',Y,.... - ?, -:•.,:....,-,.ci'th,..,•',t--4•tz-lr',.,.. ---:•1••-,:t.,.-2---'1-- • !•;;•':‘,.,-,••:...•..'-4.''.5• ".',:;/..-...".4...?i':-, ;1.--:'••••'. '. •--- , •:'!•:'...:-.:•::..;i:;:.Zi.:::,..r.-.-.4s-;;.'.-.{5?.;,,F.,...11.....-:?.. ...i.;fr.'"A.7.,_< ..."...f .f.t-4,7.4.,14,&,_,..4.?',1.•:.?•••Arq,..,s.,...1.....3:._:7-v."- .....,...:f...%).:-.;',.-;...:,,i1,,v.i..-. ....:.i14..:....i..:•i:::..,..t;',1.-"-'::•..-:.': .. "••••" , ,..,-,;t4f.'.;,...-.)..!..,-.:...:::!...A.-=',.e...,•;-it.i':.,.. ..fett:''Z'Ai":;; ;;..- '•,.•*1V:1','- ‘,..'44, -- .- :;•••,...:• .';•"1...,,,, ,..:41.i.')*,',77:-.4,0:r..;•'`,..'••••-:, :••• - • • ..:;,f:'.''.:-'!I.i;• %';':;41.."7-3.',''.1;11--.1'''4*:(q.ii-...;111,Z. 4'71.' -•.' -•--:•••••••••,-*,,'''V',.. .e::••,..,7,-*-;:':•-•,;i •,".:..".: ::.: ' ' ' .. •;•.,...,,i4:::..-i..ciraa-,'•-•.`.. .".,•''':' ." •.'" .' • KEY ISSUES • AS YOU CAN SEE COLD FORMING FOR COIL SPRINGS IS A MATURE TECHNOLOGY. COMPUTERS ASSIST IN THE DESIGN OF SPRINGS AND MODELING THIS ELIMINATES WASTED TIME AND MATERIAL . TITANIUM FLAT SPRINGS IS A NEW MARKET WITH A LOT OF POTENTIAL. RENTON COIL SPRING CO IS CONTINUING ITS TITANIUM RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. WE ENJOY WORKING ON NEW IDEAS . THANKS TO ALAN CADDEY, JIM MILLER, SPRING MANUFACTURES TITUTE AND THE DYNAM ET, IN D T TIMET, AND RMI COMPANIES, FOR THEIR HELP IN THE PRODUCTION OF THIS PAPER. I • • I - I • I { I • • I • *****A A***A********ll A n*l[ A*]l**R A F !l*I{ !l A*****T*A ]l F ]l !l*A A A*)l n !l M1**I.*]l !l City of Renton WA Reprinted: 08/25/97 12 :53 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9705377 Amount: 2, 513 . 12 08/25/97 12 :53 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #036787 RENCOIL Init: LMN Project #: LUA97-123 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Total Fees : 2, 513 . 12 This Payment 2 , 513 . 12 Total ALL Pmts: 2, 513 . 12 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** !Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0006 Conditional Use Fees 2 , 000 . 00 , 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 13 . 12 RECEIVED AUG 2 5 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON HALINEN LAW OFFICES,P.S. A Professional Service Corporation David L.Halinen,P.E. Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building (206)443-4684 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Fax(206)646-3467 Bellevue,Washington 98004 October 28, 1997 SUBMITTED DURING PUBLIC HEARING Mr. Fred Kaufman City of Renton Hearing Examiner 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Renton Coil Spring Company's Application for a Conditional Use Permit for Phased Development of the 2.8-Acre CA-Zoned Site Located at S. 7th Street and Talbot Road South WITHDRAWAL OF OUR AUGUST 18, 1997 REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL TIME DURATION WITHIN WHICH TO IMPLEMENT THE PROPOSED PHASED DEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. Examiner: I am writing on behalf of my client, Renton Coil Spring Company ("RCS"). By letter to you dated August 18, 1997, on behalf of RCS I requested a ten-year period within which RCS could secure a City of Renton building permit for the new building proposed on the site as part of RCS' application for a conditional use permit. (That proposed new building is referred to as"Building 4" in the conditional use permit application package.) I hereby withdraw that request upon RCS' directive to me because RCS has subsequently determined that, after further consideration of its needs, it now anticipates that it should be able to implement the proposed new building phase of the project(along with the balance of the project)within two years of conditional use permit approval, which is the ordinary period specified in RMC 4-18-14E. Sincerely, HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. David L. H linen cc: Renton Coil Spring Company ;4 Attn: Charles Pepka `"` ` • Roger Richert, AIA, Richert& Associates °> Jennifer Toth Henning, City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department D:\CF\2353\001\KAUFMAN.LT2 ! . . ., . , . . , . ., . ,-4 --. ‘.-. , ... .3 mi.; ,..., ,. 3 • t f,•,,, m ,-; ,.• . ,. , , L— , \I • - p.. V ,..4 4 . .../- n o — • s : 4 , 1 1;m_ Ti •0\s‘s P ,.... O - 41 ,._11 lin -lig -k— — SHATTUCK•. \\ - S iww-f,-1, 1 Wat R METER I a. en SRO ER1 alcCOUREY 4 i,_ -,1•_.1.:1--I'l-0 IOU TR., • ; 0 ,.-k-,-1,_,- .i',.'-I-_ __ _ - --- ...-. av fat le VAI Clialt:\ a-... clkji I ""‘ Te/1 kW 10 MI 4%H/TWORTH ' ° , JAMES I BANNER CR 80112 litt mph* ...0_. I PA ',.. "-., .i. ISM „„.& -=-,I 0 --I- -r•, -...%,..' -..t.rzr• axatg.il 130 11/4- 1 i _.,...__.I.• . , ..,- MORRIS ['e"" •17-1mrf4,N14 .-. v v..1 '. -,-_do, N ,o" 1 i A 1 I i ;ik lrot ! ' r -— i fir-,14,-,*---p r''i 61 ill;g i ; .i vor0." It 'v I I, 7" ' c" w :i,..1' ' 'ii. ,_,,. .....„ 1E --I 11 b:/ • a LO ................ma,a1 ...... - , ,.:„..,... . a. a. . t .... 0 e to mil al gilts ti, 1 7 f I I/— -Lr--- • ...,\ 0 ... i.„! ; \,,. . in i- 41,... . .op.. . • .110 ;-- , .,„ [iv% _0 ' is . I I ;.; ,• P: ,...,,, 1 - ' ... 4'4) : 1--------- L , •D •• •../..._ .. ----_P 1'1 ID ill!latrucg )'k.' .414LA C _.. — ,t• dm,.IC(133, 0