The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA97-034 \ i�il g- gam:�"1�,111�N�s �l,iii re anaxemi .ErLIMO R-8 I I I I1 111Il�J 11flI R-I° - y ` 8 ' R-10 =R-24 1111111 I R10 mmil.=Z�. I a - �, \ :o C5 r1i1\ Z m■1„71 NE 4th ST- T R-8 InUri wpm gm. . ,.:.,...__. an P-i i . R ER m _....... ' VICINITY MAP FOR UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER 0 1 \I�7 -g� yy 1u�� L -ARCHITECTURE ,, TxTLra E�� aci NE¢N F� ENGINEERING 0 a •= --,„NEBU, YI—•— I PLANNING NE61hFLACE 1 ��a=,1�a� MANAGEMENT FYI_ITI1_ F r�7VFDdR� n �myS�=a _ R-8 ♦ ' THE SITE(BEFORE DEVELOPMENT)IS WOODED ""�'■ ■I~Iyy�r�� 701 DEXTER AVE.N. AND CONTANS A MIXTURE OF ALDER DOUGLAS FIR - RTIR "6111M =1+"",Rom— R-10 SEATTLE,WA 98109/ �� AND HEMLOCK DUE TO EXTENSIVE SITEIXT I (206)285-4300 6'-0`WIDE• -- •' THE EXISTING TREES WILL BE FEMONED.REFER NE S.STREET A - LANDSCAPING TO THE NEW LANDSCAPN FLAN FOR INFORMATION R-Z4 �___53•-er- AND LOCATION CF NEW TREE AND PLANT "��■■ 0 L Y M P I C NpTE REFER TO CIVIL DRAUNNGS y0•-9• ll'-9• m'2• MATERIALS.REFER TO CIVIL FLAN FOR NEW NEW CONTOURS ATION ON ogre. - 8 R-10 NEW CCNTOlR9 AND fETAMMG WALLS BB9•ml'ME a• GRADPG AND CONTOUR INFORMATION Mal ASSOCIATES (TYPICAL) ^j/��/�� ///%w G COMPANY '�/ ONE WAT 20'ODE CROW AISLE a wv,wo, / RM-I ll ME" NE 51N siFEET R-10 60.00.1 a/ / j�j/ W g EXISTING AND NEW CONTOURS.UTILITIES j/,�, f'V/r EMUS j j i :.�" KEIVRATOCIVIL DRAWINGS - \ —J j r;;: j; FOR RFNTO TIDN CN DOSING AND WALLS \ UNION PLAZA G//./ a O NEW CONTOURS AND RETAINING WALLS "� jj+%/-/fj//I / �il (TYPICAL/.REFER TO QVIL DRALUNGS RM-G 51 \_a //> ,••:�- /g T� SHOPPING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXI9TRG AND _ 5'-0'WDE _ -- p NEW UTILITIES. Ce DER AP"'G $ u! j/ I 0 �S 5'-0`WDE - \\ 3 CENTER RECEJIRED i-:,r <,,, /�/i ::-•;/� FFER �1\g 0 LANDSCAPING CS 8� OFFICES W / / BF9�4B5� . y.-St 3T-IF ��/// /j ��/j// ' „ ,„////////////D�.' r�dm eTREer a , \ R• k • / 6 — CS 3904 NE 4th STREET N4 I I u` i`� ._ R 8 CS RENTON, WA 1'NI ., :,iCI'1' ''' 44,)%,...‘...,.1..,.s..M4..:,.,3.1.4.4•s..,).•-.M\,:•t`‘lN.:: I -J 1\i�1\7.\V1.4 % APNG rj !E 3,1 BALE \\�\ \\< ./ S P-I \ \ WDE w\a�:::sy� y I \ \ 2 VICINITY MAP \ ig F. N. — — \ \ J scale L"=zoo'-o" —`2mm' smm' �'1 4 \ n 2 N. / LITT OF RENTCN zONFG rLAHor4TION ES s 9 \ EI \ / a \ TOTAL ecLA E FOOTAGE OF NE SITE, 154b90 SF. \\\\\\'. �/[ \ 68C a 00_ F! b:] ,. 33C� \ TOTAL=JANE FOOTAGE CF NE MILDEW, SITE PLAN �� \ Byq[. \ 9'#0 9'x70' T!'x70 9•x70' �I l,. \ RETAIL OPACF \ t1,52 SF. 1.! \ —I \tl' BIIILOPG'B' SOO 5F. \ "\ BUIIDRG 9' 9 3 SF. \ \ 05\ — \\`a � fd:TAll TOTAL 31Z53 SF. \ I CART ( 'I ,'' \�\9 0 \ \ �nf $FKE SPACE \\Q\�\\, BU LDPG A 97039F. • \ RESTAURANT SPACE \ \ BIILOPRANT• TOE SF. \ \ NE9TA1&AVf TOTAL 1b5 9F. / \ \ - � � PRLVEOf TOTAL 80496 SF. BUILDING"A" ;' 4 ,„„ TOTALS MARE FOOTAGE OF ELM.woTFRNTS bIJ03 SF. 2nd FLOOR \, I I. i, i ' I I I I FF%F7RAGECF LOTCOrERKE, 24. k70' • -.Caw°."�'w✓:°w 9 - b CARS PAIBCPY ANALTBIB / 9 CARS \ - b CARS sl RILL SIZE SPACES FRONDED 338 ~ Fr, am $ % - 9 x \ n 9 CARS•WO' Vt.x RI 6 CARS (9'-0`x 20'-0`) `\ \ \ I + CCI•PACT SIZE SPACES PROVIDED II B'-0`ODE / \\3l•-m' 32,0. / LAMSCAPPGmob I HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SPACES l SIPPER j/ /%/41%%%/ /%%% _ C��;;,..;//? (PER WAG 5EO STANDARDS, t` PAF3CPY BPALE TOTAL 346 \F+ -� L SCLAFE FOOTAGE CF stream LOT LAR98CAPNG 1,14 SF. EXISTMG MANACLE _ -CL \�-'ANEW e'SERER LINE EXISITPG B' — — SCALE FOOTAGE OF ALL OVER LANDSOAPNG 30,9N SF. SEVER LINE EXISTING STORM SYSTEM 9 NE 4TH AVE. \ ALL^V°^F�� • P, NEW B'SELLER LPE ` EXISTING Q'WATER LINE PROPOSED BWLDTIG,EIGHT 36•-0• NEW 5'-0'ODE SIcEWALK RECLINED SETBACKS 5'••FRONT NEW 5'-0'PLANING STRIP PROPOSED an -mx 960I B'•FEAR 6.� PROPOSED SETBACKS B9'a FRJNTra. _ sS•SIDES ma —�eQ ... 1 SITE PLAN �LL�� •�� CL SCALE 1"=40'-0" ,c� 3 PROJECT DATA ,.... 3/14/97 09:35 HIT - --- ---- - - - - ------ - ------ ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING , GGG,,, PLANNING Q -Q NE y MANAGEMENT A , \ CJ I 701 DEXTER AVE.N. \\\ -Q 6 - Z NE 6t►t PL, W SEATRE,WA 98109 La I — E � in (zos)zes-aaoo NEbthPLACE g Q R-8 ASSOCIATES R-$ �= COMPANY R-8 R- l I I n I I R-10 1 I y NE Sth STREET R.g - - R-24 UNION PLAZA $ R-10 SHOPPING CENTER 1 GS & OFFICES RM-I R-10 NE 5th STREET R-10 • _ Ill Z I RM-C \\ ` } 1 -(t RM-C \SITE 1 ` Z CS Cs O cs � Z 1 NE 4th STREET SITE VICINITY - CS MAP R-8 CS r NE 3rd PLACE CS P-I 1 • R-10 VICINITY MAP FOR UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER - 96016.01 0 Toe 400' Q0 g. aal _ MONROE AVENUE NE e q s. uldl s W s 'i 2.I`�` °I`c', �q3� r •'y!C�° � oo��' 1¢ IF �F 11 s°, a �' ale 0 !fie° ��'� _� =g - gr o t: . �I f' i• °�o gW po`°:i r,diP i E�. r_ I I p ' 7-.I I b 7 i. �IlI�� ; ,� • v �4- ,1 O '_ aw_dr salE_i 'dti�w•4 o,SeuiL.,o A)omavwc.._� .-4 y 'a•"' I II � '..1 'I. a �s e p �L 9. -,,.)-1 ' -• --iz 3lurill. 11 fk.� '�_i , 1 `� • .i ,. _k, -. . .:.. HI . 1 m B.fbP % R.1 \' ,' T�,.,a ,\ " ; P . V rt L a I'- \*...,,,,...�v\g\`,,,.,.: I a k ^ •.,1 I I�'' •a 1I .. ,aM s 0 '111 1 r Ii, ,•+:I 1� r `'E I�� ! tv ' t.' 1 — �\ _ ;1.� ' Ig '. 1 , I i el g 11 ICI'.'; ti l I,1 L sol.,•E' j e r. ,I 1 I°� q I .. \ .L �7.._.--_; VI o „,,t__ _,_4,_, i .: : 0 Yaiiebe 6: go �-- U as OO�� 0 0 `U AA e i ill i tl I ® -- 1 �F T' .dl'Nb ]$I.fLY05 °R- 11 • 'i I '11 Li LN'''.Mt — . 1§ ,Iil, —, :U 1....11 . 3 01! •LL�J1 Qi i.8 I. E1 gv §w §Y °' .;_._ 'A ill; I 114 .,.. , N1',.\, N00.251S•V 262366'00 262364'(CIIY OR REN1010 - - 'UNION AVENUE &d:aM i' ilg1 ®®®®®® ®®®®D®®[>»1›»_ O ©©© OO eeeyeee00 1WI S gnaw R R R R A .F g � gI x x � s s � g o g s ,, o v : D 11!Ph4 / P s1 O ff\ v v K v H •t vU v = v v v v •a v v v v v F € (Tii D `� A i II ft, i ¢OIOxpS AK M 8 3A, Al A g ; i t p§ 8P ''' 4 A . —___._ ! 1 t O.... ^�_e :�� ^i® "�E� e �P ".a ^fie x�R�e ��a �,s ��® L,® ��a ® " ?�sa " :�_e �� r�Q ® ; a�� P@." �5l g A U...K n Dx-" a one '' s ' t! s .. Z ; - 4._ =� 'W. x"� xu- s' m us s U [� W ' '4 ceu sx l 88N 84 88"g 8 =4 =4" si' wmp wuS§ 4 s 8 O .J ,,,,,, $, rt1 5 s s x U. "�x on x _'z s.. 'x.. m K-. _ . . ��- $x- x'a" .; - __ " es x u " -I . Hk,., - �N ... - - - ., 15 ., Nk1NN� "' ., _ _ y1 - - 'a-uVv - R5v F. Ibix AK Sr 4 4 4y x .3 '' 4 .. "--' § 4 . K _ )ems §% .1g 4 D _ r _ BePcc h...IR..IWi..I...l Rm„ b6M..a. PGHAVS s<°M 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUiH Diipni°iMu �` n�' 6042 COf E' KENT,WA 98032 „� OLYMPIC ASSOCIATES COMPANY PRELIMINARY GRADING AND (206)251-6222 701 DEXTER AVE NORTH STORM DRAINAGE PLAN A„I �'�. (206)251-8782 FAX a"°'°_pm I.w 6 mf ExONEERwc. LT R Wxwc. �' ° ~" SEATTLE,WA 98109 MiAC7M3 tY•'°LM°,h•6' SUR°EYINC,ENMRONYEMAL°ERACES mI.2 20 97 (206)285-4 00 ARCHITECTURE CNRE , ENGINEERING PUNNING MANAGEMENT '01 DEXTER AVE.N.ip7411/4 EATRE,WA 98109 ..,Tllllalllll liiiii!!!lllllllllli;;,iiiil liiii��!!IIIIIIIIU;;°iiiillli�ii�!!��LIIIII!!illlllll,I aIIU;ul.. ..11i;!;iiiillliiii��hen..IIIIIII!;I;;iiiilNliiiii!1h...III..id..iiilllllll__lb.._.. .. (206)285-4300 O L Y M P I C + � �� '_�� 1 Taira-_ ASSOCIATES % _ -"`. "._1'3' J- msr L ..,..LJ IxiiTiL.e1=P2..inla:l V 1 - mmwmi 1"r'1 �.u•.1......1. 0 UJ II i =:att-pl - COMPANY UNION PLAZA 1 BUILDING "A" FRONT ELEVATION SHOPPING SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0" CENTER & OFFICES ‘ e- �^ 3904 NE 4th STREET IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII/\!IIIIIIIIIIIpI 1�IIIII�III11'lll 1111 =-��_— ''e RENTON. WA A �"� III NUS Itll - n: I ■ EF 11 M.W A 4 T I I -n _ �_ 1 -II1II .� - I�_ n ALL PECNANICAL EQUIPMENT WILL -- ----:._ �'.� I BE HOMED N ROOFTOP RECESSED # _ -- 1 I.___. I. AREAS AT FEAR SIDE CF ROOF AT ALL BOILDNGS( -ILAL,,', 2 BUILDING "B" FRONT ELEVATION `L11,, ''► LFiICE LEASE SPACE ..Inlllla11l111111�!�I . Ij1!!!IIIIIII1IIIIIu1,.._ ., IIIIIIII�II1IIII1I11n11 !Ir IIII1IIIIII11111uIIIIlu1,.. Mall' _ t-X PT air •fin -•��—rt- m-3- —7 INCOP'1 F'NNI7a"7 I 0 n�•.•TY F an II i ��- ■! Via._'! i'(_ o '='; fy i Io_ ', iu ni 11F Jo -'! s' i •T i� - BUILDING • I. 'I\ _�—„,_,---_.-=_—:.�-F= - - ; ' -E_ -�-- =.:.11[1-= ...,-_ � _ BUILDING BUILDING "C" BUILDING "D" ELEVATIONS SCHEMATIC BUILDING SECTION 3 BUILDING "C" & "D" FRONT ELEVATION 4 SHOWING HVAC EQUIP. LOCATION SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0" SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" FREFNIVIED PETAL ROOFING COLOR TO BE GREEN OR \ TERNS METAL GRAT \ TIER , FIXi FEAK \ PAINTED EJFS.SIGN BAND AT ER C - COLORPREEN TO B METAL I OR FREFNISIED PETAL ROCFNG GLA NG CLEAR 8 STTEM RTT-t COLOR TO BE GREEN OR LI COLOR TO BE GFEEN OR PANTED EIFS..W�H F000 CENTERo^" TEWE PETAL GRAT THINE PETAL FETAL - N SPLIT FACE a'L AT a arz am _ GLITTERS AND PETAL FASCIA, \ —UNION PLtiA— G\cctl\UNION-FLAZF\A3-53 Pn GUffER9 ATID 6CFFR PFEF W" TETAL FASCIA. V` \ NUTTERS AND SOFFIT PANTED WOOD FRIEZE BOARD . , . , - PANTED LL1'IOD FRIEZE BOARD CLEAR MRIATED GLANN STENNI ,--- FAMED ETES.SIGN BAND � PANTED N S SIGN BAND ®�®- - M SPLIT FACE all _ ATUIRECRIAFf -1 JO'SI fCARDS I I C: sPLtt FACE au PREFNEIED METAL ."' OVEM'ANG I I I I I I I I I LI I I I I I.' l I I I l I 111 I I I I I I I I1, !!!! RECESSED PETAL DDWSPCUT = DELI - ./_ � • SPLIT FACE all - - - - tJ ! •��y P R I C H T RECESSED PETAL DOR15FL71T - - = CLEAR INSULATED GLAZUG STSTBI 11 _' 0, �.'ma CLEAR NSULA ED CiAZNG SYSTEM ^� SFLtt FACE all BETQd7 7�� , _bk _`®�, `� ® �i.e SPLIT FACE at SPLIT FACE CP6- t" \ ^^�'(, ON �� V�� 5 TYPICAL BUILDING MATERIALS MATERIAL DESIGNATIONS ARE SHOWN ALRRIOFI OF BUILDINGSTEM. FIND "CM •.� �� BUILDING "C" & "D" USE THE SAME METAL ROOFING SYSTEM, SPLIT FACE CMU, AND SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" CLEAR WINDOW GLAZING SYSTEM AS SHOWN IN BUILDING "A" AND B". • 3. - ', m.o. O Cr a•o I ffa O n•e O se f me T me me © me D n'e ® ao 0 ao ® no L e •'T)� __ ARCHITECTURE,opii$.41114 ff4 m ENGINEERING A I A A A A A \ I\ I I I\ I\ I\ I\ \Ilk lk PUNNING ci:Ii. giii DMZnullingTo. MANAGEMENT A , •_.11194M - t h- ilig •gMinn 7 DEXTER AVE. ' SEATTLE,WA 96109 I--� I*. (206)285-4300 bitillia c OLYMPIC ii Loat i- I,.i V 11 -, ': - ASSOCIATES , COMPANY I r • I I I I I I I I I _ = = =�� - _ -'- - _ "-- - =_=' ' UNION PLAZA 00 0 0 0 " O 0 0 r3 ,0' 9 '0 0 '0 0 ,0--- 0 SHOPPING O PI S 81 OFFICES 1 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0" 3804 NE 4th STREET RENTON, WA r.00 0 0 0 O O OO 0 .1., '0 © 0 0 0 r•.1,;� mo so no nn n'O L'P ledT mp ,0..0. 27.17 n.7 II', n-0. a,yfVI1Y, m� 1- Y[ 1 L I \ � _ , lei® 1 1 I . - 1 - :_4iMi, ;} r .\ 1 /,./..., 1 rI_H r 1 {; F -I ''I`\ 6- /' 'A` -16ul:,I 1I1111l:1111111V171I 1 MINI11 M1"IIIIIII'119111111RIIII111-"I"1111"101I_ILILIL1„11'i --- sil'11019111E'l!°'11111119111CII71 "I"IIAIICll91"14IAI1I1111 I. ,.L.L.L.I1,.1 L.L.L,I.I I. .,L,L.L,C1 III� BUILDING 'A' 1= 0 0 © 0 O O O� ® ® a FLOOR PLANS 2 LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLANS SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0" t . - --- { 5 1k1 j l I 1 11 I I I I I I I I f - I I I I 1 I I 1 1 ..,., .vu<ir .,�.., b<," t - I I I I I I All,.,,' i�1\,,s�-_ �`:I. 6\;A. r •C O P Y_ 4R I G H T• I: O O O O O O Q _ D 00 0I� 0 ptl� ...® �. 3 ROOF PLAN "". °•°m Q= ] SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0" . �e ARCHITECTURE T _ Q (� (� m I _ 0 --I O _ _ _ _ ENGINEERING,fil .. -- - - 1f - IL _,_ Q e PANNING MANAGEMENT A , 1 701 DEXTER AVE.N. SEATTLE,WA 96109 1� OLYMPIC ASSOCIATES "`4 WAG; Y I 1 I I -1—\ COMPANY I I 1 1 1 OPEN TO mow s . wl UNION PLAZA r;1 SHOPPING 0-- -1.-- — — ~ r o CENTER 1 OFFICES MAiLL4°P°F 3904 NE 4th STREET RENTON, WA 1 I I 1 I 1 I r , 1 �a I 1� U 0' Q n 1 i i i I��I 1 , , i i ,� i I�� 1�i li O i Et 1 } F 1 m 9 D D e e 1 LOWERI LEVEL FLOOR PLAN a • BUILDING "B"" ® © ® © 2 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN — BUILDING "B" SCALE I/16" = I'-o^ SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0^ T 1p © Q Fy ; ID ID O I 0 LKi tz>< ?( 1I I 1 , I 1 I , BUILDING 'B' r%' """`^^' ^n' FLOOR PLANS ROOF PLAN 1 1 I 1 1 Smart aM�mm� 1 , O _ -_ _ 1 _ -�- _ --a---_----n— _,I a - Pm ..... I 0ACAJNLw16V-PIATIAA-3 I I I LL 0,. --FY _-__TT____TT____T-r -r TT-TT_ -TT- _TT____TT____I hI (� .� oay.e� aummnicmo' , I 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 II ,1 I I 1 1 1 1 I II c 1 I1 I, 1 1. 1 I, I I I 1 1 I , 00 b b 0 / / b Tba i 0 0 0 0 0 ©e — °® A-2 3 ROOF PLAN — BUILDING "B" SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0' .3,97 „a a • -__- ARCHITECTURE - - - - --- ----- -_--- --—-- ----- -- ------ - - - ----- - - --- -- ----- - ---- - ENGINEERING -- PLANNING MANAGEMENT i a ip A 4 ® ® 00 O O 0 701 DEXTER AVE.N. OQ O ® O ® r and ® 0 'L t SEATTLE,WA.98109 0.'d Od LI —Z'— _— _ —= (206)265-4300 Alla IL af:/► �► Al,�► :�!► �C�.I Af. �f�► ASSOCIATE S COMPANY s 4 1 1, UNION PLAZA SHOPPING — - - — — — -L CENTER & ��.�1®I OFFICES ® O O ® O ® ors oho 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L IQ., E 4th STREET BUILDING "C" BUILpING "ID" 3904 N RENTON, WA 1 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0" 4 • BUILDING "C' & "D' FLOOR PLANS •C 0 I. Y R 1 C H T• m r'V'r PRELIMINARY WATER PLAN �r �.„w'e"" _ WATER DATA g Yt.. :' '.. • 2 T-40' a6'� `` • !� st>QomseE sw.es• / .AP/ I. O i- gr Q I-ill2C 1/7.(i1!/.:'r%/r97 AIZO.i'/3fi..e.".//%//%' , p Ir MI.) ROM EOM TO CONSTRUCOCH Z. _�„�i ,,..i l ° ,� t . _ O,-ram CONNECT TO[4 �7 .,n Vim. w u d n.;wuoaw '� : ou, •„�u., OO MOMS w"m""..m eca+rnnm .,a ,r ,- ',`.';_ INN�� t�M1 —.'�'',dE� I- ^I I-I W CONSTRUCT.. O I I b — I t•i . L'f_ 11 pP-- w ILLQLI Q _ 'I ®i cu Q LL1 N a s . ¢Ic— a p,PPE a_ S r,e m M o r, it I ° _ I ,- „lE. sue. C i ®' s 1,:. OsKaroanan mows To HNC DOM.RN NO 15111111111E3 I 4.... -, 11111 II I I I 4 if..:, m,rt— — — .rep .LT!�rXB h w, .Ssj•7�'L';Yaf,71f')l.;�r _,aee.oa• n.,. _ __� r s. =;--- ::Sri^` —_]�� - , ,.... . -x €a ti' -=-w g9 _�-ar —ten racer `L �e1A ,. ....�,_.,,�Y� � 'L9 ---*q -rE_at1_9PEET_ —tQ---- '---j-- -- Qy 0q �;� ., .._^;",.0 -..eK --`- - 1M4SL9] �a [macs,/,/op 1 01 rna sam., w,./,•„os/uaP:v my soe 1-40 au...Ion Rni. zcwz-suswz-oI. • PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER PLAN - . :.' SEWER DATA T-40' „„.„... .., ...27...-nr,71.7.„7„7.•:-P- 1.:A reint,:n ilcirir Po ! ....... i` u � KIT/ W4 CC Z'' '4 ma- II I .ar r we[u na rx, li&I nc>;E a f - -x,•'• , '°'-'°' a d x� �. na[ '--. x` ' 'w I• . ,.BI M Ir..:..��.. t I ;., �a a E M 42. t;f a s E.;I III �.00 x d'f' _,� [.J�,, CIONON NN51W 11[ — •. 11 x I.' % Pn w]5a ii m LOGO.AM - "l':j ` ,•_ [Rae yw mam1.101u vmi TO ";+ — x i 9� '. ' )'� •�oe'arE t W. I' asa m'a 049 [ • I x y. o o I. / , ��i,i J^ ._x n-.r ....� 'i 3€� sam =Jsio°' ' ;.l! ri IL o'b i :, .r'A' ��•i IS i 483 .4._ .. BL.DG,q.: . _ Q N ...� i • FF-.996.Q� n 1 x a a. t5 eL.; xp�. viiti � g� n o itI). 1 im .. MP'. 1,397 0 1 At. .. .. _ . I� •O.. ' '..' a & "s • \h OE • I- ;'� . (? � .-.. i -"-IO.' C[ /YA %i%%.Li a7/.Q L % .':LQ"i a p ■■ � . L an• MODS ..'I'4. -) - .. __ 1 -e. ° A- .�v m x^ , fN :4--o m�a- -ream-a T xw.sa �P i '• 17_0 .:� („otp •� - .. `-,. dam— -Iz-- ��', ems: a'J `c .„={inn -. .,r, W\y O�o.Mar, 4., t N coI Evn[Sa $]/a/.e I . U •.6,142••1 ,.�w/,z/,.., 09w Seal.1.40 0/11 I,m,on Nr,,.. 26042-5126(1.1-81. • KEYST E RETd MG l FRASER PHOTMA WALL TS°�E CI ILJ l WESTER/RED CEDAR I 6 LLE9rEFN RED CEO AR i ED LE AWN I ;,:r......F..-7:;;:::::iii..-,-.7:,-.-.=•-• f -.-.:.au_�a �.:...,. .. �,. ._ vauGLa5F1 SPEGIFGATIONSI� 1F 143-KMJNMNICKrT� , �r •i " Ti ^▪ ....fir::."r`..+_`.�..`.>'"`..:`+wilr. 410 II-gyp5E , � ___ 1}-TITKFIRE' 29FRASER PHOTINIA �ceo, \ F -.p�y ��.,,,,,, + ` •30' It-'SR2.NGWOOD PINK. • • PIERI9•3h O.C. •5'OD. �O(tl- 1 v I '+\ 11 C HEATHER.}Iy OL. BUILDING•nf B-DWAS SKII'Tnld .V� nQ.0;,,. ="-. ,.e..=...,.r.u.L:r:=."...V` 's•"' II f i'N� II L fin•HT.B£w•1 I RETAIL I ,I% - ` ".:=..w'--......'BE {� ' /�� }5-BROAD220OR •L, m.u.m �•• '+-'PINK'ort. ER SB-'HEATHE •2 INK' I}-'dNdN O ' 31ta,,vg. • _i n'HT.BER1 'Lh`w\ I JUMPER OD �i, . - :7:`"rn..`..nu:�..:1.�x 1 INODODENDRQJ T3-'O `�I •}�h'OL.MIK_ - HEATHER•}K'O.C. •3'7'OD - 3}-'uFRINGUIWD PIKK' t /��• ' y.r F y_^�M -"�. [ 11�{Au� 1 �1 MMIERAMPIERMIONI C v ER '2h,OL. L"'H+',i t'O . .IJI'vr -- - - ---- - -- -- - - - - -- - - ram.' c KEYSTONE '�� m,....� •o�w.. _ U - { I e' - 1}'Hi.BERI'1 1 .�� I A�4� n•HT.BERM He He It'r�1 II RETAINN //.?- .._..._7e ®......,.,..,...,._.:._ II�1�� " V __ � f JL YCivIIL}SEE tv, ......w•...,_..�.r._. . •O u a 4a-1CU14NZAI.1' 65-'SPRR1.'W^OD PINK. A� S..,0 •$ lb-'AVTHONY WATERER' HEATHER•}ty ,G P_ 3-DOWL45 d^ t ▪ o.':Ali':"��:.:'!'.:. SEE I I `�{ CHEi SPIREA•3.OD `` L � f•' S.' I fil rr �I}-'RHOD ENrDRON FIR err_ 1�.w.. /r_ ,A�,, 1(>♦�1 µµ.._ •3'h'OL. 9d9-:4LdL �' / �_ '�V< n'Ht �:• n'HT.BERMS 71 NC M-- 3'OG .}.r.nr+�+��e r��.r vw..,... ki-• ra.` wr,' ,v e�S�,I aEM yl�^ ..'WI ...:....._ _ CO 1 l .Il fii�f Ir�� ' 11_ 4.WEBTEFd.• ''(�a� _.r...w �...�...I.r...�rw._�r...�..-wcc LL 1r. .�v �� ,--- I/.' I I RED CEDAR 1 u.. r�_�� 10 •°� 10B-'HEELER.'HOLLY 1}-'CLEVELAND SELECT' (BUILDING'B, A� _ •3'OD. FLOWERING PEAR l5-'••3.OD.'HOLLY ,•_..:,_+.,,,.�r.e....._7_......., O 13Fy' 5-Da1KaLd5 { 7 O Z I / �T, I H . /f�$I� I 0-'AN4H KR15CHKE' FIRI , .. e++,.�........_..,_.._..... ..r..� O = • D. T.BERMS .fa' RHODODENDRON ,•`^ a.._+ 'I{�{`i p .J �� }•HT.BERH! r311l. I •3'iT•OL. ;/',. nti w ti�.� .��a, BE \' ��:/�I f�_f 1 Irf.�j 4-WESTERN 4'� • ..,...��-" I—.Q .e 1 =! 1 �,R� i) t RED CEDAR 1y � °,'-w.�. •r.".`.e ,+�._-"r,.e 'R J j,, i e� v a �+ • _ I RETAIL ,, ., Z Z _ I,,t 5d-'HELLERI'HOLLY 151-dNTHONY WATERER' 36-'HELLERI'HOLLTy/�1 _or �� III •3'OD. SPIREA•3'O.C. •3'OD, ',STELLA D•DRO' �% �,y y,. .... L YKEn �,ll[ _ CC aL ;, �, •. DATLILY••}OL 1 9 f \ /dI J j `^ 1 I b5(� I I (YN�4• _ _ -rs_•�uT_eel.�_I- - - - __I___-__._ _O u•�T.esl, waf __ ;:ems. _. _ i}-s Ir+Ga�O-HJB BERM ti�T r v! Inca) /f��N�. tit*, '��43I" H£AT4ERI•.y }L ~� 11 t 0 :' `C .- I I :: ' ��. •1L,,,_, ROCKERY• I}•RHOD�El:SDRON Q'i4wlT, m • i I }}6-'SPRMGJYJOD PINK. n-•NNdH KRJSGHCE' BeR-I (SEE CIVIL/ Q j : 3 ! ... I I PINK IJE4THER •5-•SPRIN u1000 PINK' RHODODENDRON T ldu V' •3y OL I��V� iiii SEktl 1 I }�h L. _4THER•Ns.oL. •310.OL CHERRY i g,L ttom�,, .•w ��}G/...�.�sGG 1..\7� RFIC��4 v�:m. Ld.DI 04- 1 J IT!. 9 430VE ��' R�y` •..•":o-`V I� q �1�'i�2 _ i .. .0 I. I Y .��• `�,� _ __ __ ___ _ _.._�= f►Hf JLIR.try _ _�._ 's"®a • ' 1 / ,1-.. ^^^i •HG 1 1I♦ F ' l CEDAR ALA^JCA , • 11.0,0 I\, �� m_, 3-GREEN 1` %.*� }I-BROapHGDR �"�^M A LnYKEN P' AI, _ }4-TTM FIRE'PIERIS SFRRJGWOOD PINK. -y4PyiESE e3J� �.f JUNIPER•6'O.C. LAUREL 35-'SPRINGUIOOD PIKK' •3'h•OL. HEATHER•}V.•OG MAPLE /I!►1./t4 {4'OL (/I/ 1[I` HEATHER•241•QC A L I Ij•I'fY . Ia.KINNIKMNILK i I I II j��l . [WILDING T)' }B-DONATE SKR9'Id , I I }03-•3' O.C. 1.A 111.E WEE PLANTING AND STAITED DETAIL NES BUILDRJG'C' Gt •3'OL. 30-SALAL _` R• T , •3 OD SEED �JL�'?7IIV }-00C CL45 FIR W e'H / 17.l\jor BERMS 65-ERASER P..OTMId B-SPREAD NG ENGLISH �A 1T 1 AW ••5'OL. YEW 3 rNV Zjr 646 I y�I �6,,' Igor _.�' �CA� S �.{t 5-CEDAR RED .- _vs us a., W �i7 7. `•. t�.i .i ll�iiiai.L7iMiYrwi .,,.".... ..a• .e e. a `�-.' z [- i%� L � }} }R E WEBS ER - annemV♦! 'N Ei_ 16-S4L4L }-IIESTERN RED / \ RHODODENOFON B3 3• 'OG ICK I,µ; i�o. I sou ma F�INIt I u �\ a E •L OL. CEDAR •3'h'O.C. ROCKERY fSEE CIVIL) I` PLANT MATERIAL LIST .a... •, ''''.a-. li _I QTY.I BOTANICAL NAME I COFCON NAM I SIZE.SPACING I �� j •V] 3 AC-ER P4Hdt13'1 GREEN JAP4NESE MAPLE }'CAL,IO'HT,BIB Z W Q m�i..cv loop •aar.�m.a v..a SHRUB vLANrNB SETAE. PITS NORTH w? °d'ro r a..m m tl HOER RIBFAM TED SUNSET. 'RED 51➢NSET'2D H4PLE l'CAL,1}'-14'Hi B.B•30'OZ. w l CNAVEC.PERSIOOIKa1B,5L5 PE'L/LC WEEPING ALASKA CEDAR l'-B•HT-BIB LAWN EDGE DETAL mi.w - ___-___ e" �-' Iy tl PS UO BERR.LATA 1,46,V• KWCNZAN•FLOSERING CHERRY }'CAL,10'-n•HT.B.B,BR•lly MS`� .0 n PSEUDOTSUGA I•IENZIESH DCIJGLAS FIR l'-B.HT,BIB a a U C ..+.,_J .,v. n PIRB CALLERYA.M YlErELA.O SELECT•'CLEVELAOIC SELECT'PLUG PEAR }•CAL,IC'-I}'HT.B.B BR•A1y ..s .,..s 23 THWA PLICAT4 WESTERN RED CEDAR l'-B'HT,FULL,BIB L'.I "O ,:E u+m+.,m, n rt..w m..ci 655°3 ERILAtOCdRVEd?SPRMGUOpD PNC'9PR KRY WOOD PIWC'HEATHER I G L,CONT.•}LTC PLANT MATERIAL LIST I SIZE.SPACNG I 30 1sSCALE: 1" =0'30 sD' < �� 11E QTY.I BOTANICAL NAME I COMMON NAME ua.us.CL.ET:I Z 1,254 GAULTHERIA SHALLON SALAL I GAL,CONT..3'OL. lB PRAMS LNROCERAOUF'OTTO LESSEN''OTTO LAUREL.LAUREL }I'-}a'HT,BIB•a'O.C. R }} HEI'IEROCALLIS'STELLA D'ORO''STELLA D•ORO'DAYLILY I GAL.CONT.•}'0L, u1 46 RHODODENORGN.AV4H KRUSOACE''40,N KRLSCHCE RHODODENDRON }I'-}a'HT,BIB•3H'OG 4 p� Sheet }a6 JUNIPERS SABNAEBR04DMOOR'HBROADIIOOR JAAIIPER 5 GAL CONT.•ee OD 3d RHODODENDR'JN'iRIDE LLEBSTER''TR1DE 50123 1 RHODODENDRON 5 GAL HT,B.••3VC OC ,.„,. _� rtvm.m 0 36 5KIFP'11d REEVESIREC DWARF SKITTER' 5 GAL.CONT.•}'OG �- S' z PARTED ISLAND PLANTER DETAIL p .5 PHOTNI*ERASER. FRASER PHOTMIA 3 GAL.CONT.•5'OL. ur }}B SPRAEA%Bf1dLDA'AM.OiT WATERER•ANTHCNT WATERER'SPIREA }GAL.CONT.•3.OL. s<��:xTtt. `— NT8 36 PIERIS JAPONICA T11N.FIRE' MN.FIRE'PIERIS }I•-}l•MT,13.B••3V.'OD IB TAKUS BACCATA REPANDENS SPREADING ENGLISH YEW 15•-IB'SPR•3V11'OD I , Je &p.2,1" Q J �. ••LL .w" �< - • Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred-J..Kauf nan July 3, 1997 Mr. Carl Colson 701 Dexter Avenue N,#301 Seattle, WA 98109 Re: UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER FILE No. LUA097-034,SA Dear Mr. Colson: The Examiner's Report and Decision on the above referenced matter,and the Request for Clarification thereto,was not appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore,this matter is considered final by this office and the file onyour application is being transmitted to the City Clerk as of this date. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, \(aut Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK/mm cc: Peter Rosen Sandi Seeger, Development Services 200 Mill Avenue South-Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593 it=ta_.. .,• CITY'` F RENTON Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman June 9, 1997 Mr. Peter Rosen Project Manager, Development Services City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Clarification of Site Plan Condition No. 3 Union Plaza Shopping Center-LUA97-034.SA Dear Mr. Rosen: This office has reviewed your request for clarification in the above matter. The need for a fire lane is not.obviated by the alteration of site plan required by this decision. Any fire lane shall be subject to review and approval of the Fire Department. If this office can be of any further assistance,please feel free to write. .. Sincerely, Fred J. Ka Hearing Examiner FJK:mm cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Dir. Art Larson,Fire Marshal . Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Mayor's Executive Assistant Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Parties of Record 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593 a - . . _._. . . . . . - CITY OF RENTON Planning / Building / Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: May 27, 1997 TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiiiler FROM: Peter Rosegssociate Planner SUBJECT: Union Plaza Shopping Center- LUA97-034; SA, ECF Clarification of Site Plan Condition #3 Staff requests clarification of Condition#3 included in your decision to approve the Union Plaza Shopping Center. The condition requires the site plan to provide a 20 foot wide clear drive for fire access around "the building exterior." The condition does not specify which of the proposed buildings the condition is intended to apply to. Staff had recommended this as a condition on the west side of Building B, due to the encroachment of the trash and loading area into the fire lane. Condition #1 of your decision requires the applicant to "flip" the floor plan and relocate the delivery/trash area to the east side of Buildilg B. Please clarify your intent of Condition#3 in your decision of May 19, 1997. cc: Jana Huerter • CITY OF RENTON • Planning / Building / Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: May 27, 1997 TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Peter Ros:F •ssociate Planner SUBJECT: Union Plaza Shopping Center- LUA97-034; SA, ECF Clarification of Site Plan Condition #3 Staff requests clarification of Condition #3 included in your decision to approve the Union Plaza Shopping Center. The condition requires the site plan to provide a 20 foot wide clear drive for fire access around "the building exterior." The condition does not specify which of the proposed buildings the condition is intended to apply to. Staff had recommended this as a condition on the west side of Building B, due to the encroachment of the trash and loading area into the fire lane. Condition #1 of your decision requires the applicant to "flip" the floor plan and relocate the delivery/trash area to the east side of Building B. Please clarify your intent of Condition#3 in your decision of May 19, 1997. cc: Jana Huerter AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION OF Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of NOTICE DETERMINATION AND the PUBLIC HEARING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months LUA 97-034,SA,ECF prior to the date ofpublication, referred to, printed andpublished in the English language Proposal for i retail shoppingfor center and 9offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking sJournal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the entries off es.Access NE ess4th Str et be vlLocation:a two driveway State of Washington for King County. NE 4th Ave. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County The 15 day comment and appeal period Journal not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers for this project wille run concurrently.j The (andpP 9 Y commentiappeal periods for this project will during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a end at 5:00 PM on May 06, 1997. Written comments and requests for reconsidera- tion shall be forwarded to the Development Notice of Environmental Determination Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by as published on: 4/21/97 the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$58.95 Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Legal Number 2831 Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular Leg erk, Sout County Journal meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on May 13, 1997 at 9:00 AM Subscribed and sworn before me on this�4ay of 19 l 7 to consider the proposed Site Approval. If 11 the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part � of this public hearing. __```�`�\, Published in the South County Journa' April 21, 1997.2831 , ". F � 1 ��'',,.,,,"Fyn 111 Notary Public of the State of Washington residing 0 1�:0: T %��'s°0 gin Renton 1 ...7C) 0 A lr y`P= �� King County, Washington � O P UaLtC.' i. O Oi I�I4�F�c 2 6 2�'C?�� ,1`�� ;:SN�� -71) CITY )F RENTON era1L ( \r, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 12, 1997 Mr. Carl J. Colson Olympic Associates Company 701 Dexter Ave N#301 Seattle, WA 98109 SUBJECT: Union Plaza Shopping Center Project No. LUA-97-034,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Colson: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. As you know, the Site Approval (SA) portion of the proposed application will be heard at a public hearing before Renton Hearing Examiner on May 13, 1997. The Hearing Examiner will issue a separate report and decision. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 235-2719. For the Environmental Review Committee, 6:kr\ Peter Rosen Project Manager FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer v71Washington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Sid Morrison P.O. Box 330310 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DATE: May 16, 1997 r'T"nP RFNTON ivtAY TO: Peter Rosen 2 ' 1997 City of Renton, Project Manager RECEIVED 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 405 MP 4.02 CS 1744 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance - Union Plaza Shopping Center-Construction of 4 bldg. total area 80,496 sq. ft. with 346 parking spaces consisting of retail shopping & offices File No.LUA-97-034,SA,ECF FROM: Robert A. Joseph on, E, Manager of Planning & Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project, which is located at 3904 NE 4th Avenue . Our response is below: We recommend that a traffic study be prepared to analyze the state highway intersections that are impacted by ten (10) or more of the project's generated peak hour trips and also determine what mitigation measures, if any would be required. If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. I County of King ) MARILYN MOSES ,being first duly sworn,upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 19th day of May .1997, affiant deposited in the mail of the United ; States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled.application or petition. ; Signature: 7'A Ct�i�c7 ( GJn SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this l___ day of littr , 1997. i =a = ary ublic ' and for the State of Washington, residing at ,therein. Application,Petition, or Case No.: Union.Plaza Shopping Center LUA-097-034,SA The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record May 19, 1997 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: Carl Colson Olympic Associates Co. Union Plaza Shopping Center File No.: LUA-97-034,SA LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Seeking site plan approval to construct retail shopping center and offices SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on May 7, 1997 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report,examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the May 13, 1997 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,May 13, 1997, at 9:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity map application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site plan Exhibit No.4: Landscape plan Exhibit No.5: Building elevations The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by PETER ROSEN,Project Manager,Development Services, City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant requests site plan approval for a retail shopping center. This 5.5 acre site is presently undeveloped. It is rolling and is wooded. Carl Colson Olympic Associates Co. Union Plaza Shopping Center File No.: LUA-97-034,SA May 19, 1997 Page 2 There are four buildings proposed on the site and they are oriented towards the interior parking lot. Buildings • A,C and D are north-south axis and the largest building,Building B, is located on the north end of the site. Building A and a portion of Building B are also proposed with second story offices. There would be approximately 22,200 square feet of retail space, 12,916 square feet of office,25,953 square feet of restaurant, and 22,427 square feet of grocery for a total of 83,496 square feet. Building.B is mostly grocery store with some retail associated, and with office above it. There is a 20 foot break between Buildings C and D for a utility corridor on the east portion of the site. The access is proposed from two driveway cuts off NE 4th Street and they are separated by approximately 165 feet. There are 346 parking spaces proposed to serve all the uses within the shopping center. The landscape plan includes buffers around the site. In the vicinity to the north of the site is residential area. Code requires a landscape setback which applicant is providing along the north property boundary. Renton Crown Apartments is directly to the west of the site and a landscape buffer is being provided on that side of the property. Directly to the east of the site is some commercial development along NE 4th. The proposal went through environmental review on April 15, 1997 and received a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M). The Environmental Review Committee mitigation measures require fire mitigation fee,traffic mitigation fee and a revision to the construction mitigation plan limiting haul hours. In terms of the site plan criteria, it is within the Center Suburban Comprehensive Plan(CP)designation and that is also the zoning designation for the site. The proposal conforms to the intent of the Center Suburban designation in that buildings face toward the interior of the parking area which avoids a commercial strip type of development. The uses appear to be scaled to serve the neighborhood. The building elevations indicate a number of store fronts and the scale of the different uses are smaller and would be neighborhood serving. In terms of conformance with the zoning,retail and restaurant uses are allowed as primary permitted uses and offices are allowed as a secondary use in the CS zone with the condition that it total less than 50%of the gross square footage of the site. It equals approximately 5%of the gross square footage. Having the offices on the second story above the retail also appears to be encouraged by CP policies which encourage more of a mix of uses and more intensive uses than the surrounding areas. The building elevations,the varied rooflines and materials appear to be appropriate for the character of the neighborhood commercial center. The proposal does not meet code in the area of setbacks in that it does exceed the maximum setback of 15 feet in the CS zone. Building A is approximately 87 feet from NE 4th and Building D is approximately 96 feet. In the applicant's letter dated April 9, 1997,they provided some justification for exceeding the setback. For Building D they noted that as there is an existing building directly to the east,that bringing Building D closer to the street could undermine the existing building because it is so close to the property line. The revised site plan shows sidewalk linkages from NE 4th into the shopping center which would connect up to the sidewalks that front all the buildings. There is fairly good pedestrian circulation through the shopping center. One of the criteria for exceeding the maximum setback is to accommodate the pedestrian by using pedestrian walkways and encouraging pedestrian amenities. In addition, staff has recommended some additional pedestrian walkways. One is an east-west walkway connection across the interior of the parking area to be lined up with the corridor that separates Buildings C and D. Staff also recommended that the applicant work with staff to look at potential pedestrian access from the surrounding uses,particularly Renton Crown Apartments,to provide an access onto the site so not everybody adjacent would have to walk around to enter the site via 4th. Carl Colson Olympic Associates Co. Union Plaza Shopping Center File No.:LUA-97-034,SA May 19, 1997 Page 3 The applicant has provided landscaping along the frontage in terms of a berm landscape strip and landscape islands to break up the appearance of the parking and to make more of an interesting street-scape. This is also one of the criteria for exceeding the setback. Applicant has provided more than the required interior parking lot landscaping as well. The maximum building height would be 37 feet which is the top of the tower proposed on Building B. CS Zone allows a maximum of 50 feet. The proposal meets the parking requirement with 346 spaces. There is a 20 foot one-way fire lane that goes around the north end of Building B and the west end of the site, and is principally for fire access. The truck loading dock for Building B is on the west side and it appeared from the site plan that the drive would then narrow to 18 feet at that point. Staff is recommending a condition that there be a 20 foot clear area for fire access. In previous shopping center and grocery store proposals in the City, there has been a fair amount of concern with truck loading docks and noise generated for neighbors. The proposed truck loading is along the west side of Building B and adjacent to Renton Crown Apartments. Staff has also recommended a condition that the applicant record a covenant that would require a noise test if there were complaints from the surrounding residences. In conclusion, staff recommends approval of the proposal subject to: (1) compliance with the ERC mitigation measures; (2)revision of the site plan to.provide 20 foot clear access around the building interior; (3)east-west pedestrian connection across the interior of the parking lot to improve pedestrian circulation; .(4)provision of pedestrian access with adjacent properties, if practical;and(5)recording of a covenant for noise tests for truck loading if surrounding residents express complaints about that fact. Larry Cross, Olympic Associates, 701 Dexter Avenue North, Seattle,Washington 98109, applicant herein, stated that they are comfortable with staff recommendations. Regarding the setback issue,.he stated that there is quite a rise to the site from the street so the landscape buffer is needed to get cars up into the parking lot. As a result of discussions with the Fire Department,two access points into the site are required. The space between the two buildings on the east side of the property, C and D, is intended as a service corridor for dumpsters as one of the buildings is intended to be a restaurant. It also has to do with fire access to the back of the buildings and is not intended as a pedestrian corridor. On the northwest corner of the property there is a large area of landscape buffer for two reasons. One is to meet the landscape buffer requirements and the other is that it has a steep drop-off of about 20 feet. As far as pedestrian access from the adjacent property,he stated that the residential complex may not want access out of the shopping center for security reasons. The Examiner asked if there was any reason why the access and delivery could not be switched to the other end of Building B. Mr. Cross responded that the grocery store doesn't continue all the way to that side of the building. That is a small accessory retail area that is separate from the grocery store, so grocery store loading or warehouse loading is what is needed. To flip that separate retail area to the other side of the building buries it behind Building A. Also from a practical standpoint for a truck,as there is one-way access around Building A,a truck would have to pull out into the parking lot and back up. The way it is designed now they are able to stay out of the circulation which is another Fire Department issue concerning loading. That would not be possible if it was flipped it to the other side. This is a fairly small grocery store of approximately 20,000 square feet. The deliveries are mostly off hours,and large trucks are not anticipated,no more than 30-foot type delivery vans. Carl Colson Olympic Associates Co. Union Plaza Shopping Center File No.: LUA-97-034,SA May 19, 1997 Page 4 The Examiner explained that there have been some very poor juxtaposition of delivery bays with residential development in the City, and they generally lead to confrontations or complaints. Noise ordinance requirements don't necessarily eliminate beepers that wake people up in the middle of the night. Just because sound requirements are met doesn't mean people are not disturbed by the noises that are generated. Neil Watts,Plan Review Supervisor,Development Services,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South.,Renton, Washington 98055, stated that the driveway access off NE 4th is good for entry and exit on both sides. There are two lanes of traffic and a center turn lane. The location is some distance:between'signals but there is queuing that occurs at those signals so there is adequate gaps for people to get in and out of the site. The parking lot is going to be at somewhat higher grade than the street,but as long as there is the bigger front setback, it is manageable. Carl Colson, Olympic Associates, 701 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 301 Seattle,Washington 98109,applicant herein, stated that the building elevation at the end of Building D will be approximately 26 feet 6 inches to the ridge of the roof. Building A elevation will be 34 feet 11 inches to the ridge of the roof. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak,and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:42 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS &DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,Carl Colson, Olympic Associates Company,filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for a 4-building shopping center. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 3904 NE 4th Street. The subject site is located on the north side of NE 4th just west of Union Avenue NE. 6. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 2290 enacted in November 1966. The site received its current zoning, CS (Suburban Center),with the adoption of Ordinance 4405 enacted in June 1993. 7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of multiple-story retail and office uses in clustered development patterns, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. Carl Colson Olympic Associates Co. Union Plaza Shopping Center File No.: LUA-97-034,SA May 19, 1997 Page 5 8. The applicant proposes developing a shopping center around a centrally located parking lot. There will be four buildings providing a total of approximately 83,496 square feet of retail and office space. 9. Building A which will be located along the western side of the parcel will be oriented in a north-south alignment. It will contain approximately 17,182 square feet of retail space on the first floor and 19,203 square feet proposed for office uses on a second floor. The building will beapproximately 55 feet wide by 320 feet long. 10. Building B will be divided into three component areas. The first two areas will be on the first floor. One of those will be a proposed grocery store containing approximately 22,427 square feet. The second,first floor element will be a retail space of approximately 5,018 square feet. There will be approximately 3,000 square feet of office space on the second level. Building B will be located at the north end of the site. The building will be approximately 181 feet wide(east to west)by approximately 125 feet deep. 11. Buildings C and D will be located along the east edge of the site and will be oriented in a north-south alignment. Building C will be the northernmost of these two buildings. It will contain approximately 7,613 square feet of space. It is proposed to be restaurant. The building will be approximately 60 feet wide(east to west)by 126 feet long. 12. Building D will be located near the southeast corner of the site. It will contain approximately 9,053 square feet of space. The building will be approximately 60 feet wide(east to west)by 150 feet long. 13. The buildings will have a varied roofline which includes a tower on the grocery and bay dormers on the upper level offices. The buildings will have a colored metal roof trim and horizontal beaded siding. 14. The applicant proposes two driveways in response to Fire Department emergency access needs. A drive aisle providing access to the delivery bay for the grocery store will serve as a fire lane providing access to the rear of the site. 15. The applicant proposes having its delivery,truck loading area and trash bins on the west side of the grocery store directly east of an existing apartment complex. Staff has recommended that noise tests be conducted to assure that the delivery area is not violating noise standards. Noise tests do not necessarily screen out disturbing noises such as backup beepers,engine sounds,trash dumping,etc.that do not violate noise standards but can be disturbing nonetheless. 16. The applicant was concerned that altering the floor plan and "flipping"the location of the grocery and retail space would tuck the retail space into a less visible location. 17. Staff recommended connecting the center to the surrounding residential development if that is acceptable to the residential properties. 18. The applicant proposes landscaping buffers of 15 feet along the north property line and between 5 feet and approximately 20 feet on the west property line. In general,there will be 5 feet of landscaping along the east property line. There will be a 15 foot landscape strip along the frontage of the site. Additional landscaped islands will be located at the beginning of the parking aisles and within the parking aisles. The landscaping will consist of a variety of materials with larger plants and trees I A Carl Colson Olympic Associates Co. Union Plaza Shopping Center File No.: LUA-97-034,SA May 19, 1997 Page 6 proposed along the north and northwest property lines to buffer the residential uses adjacent to the site in these locations. 19. As noted there will be 346 parking stalls. The majority of the parking will be located in the center of the site with some additional parking along the frontage and at the ends and sides of some of the buildings. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values;- f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 2., In general,the proposed site plan is well-designed with adequate landscaping,parking and an interesting facade and roof treatment for the buildings. The location of the loading dock and trash enclosure on the west side of the proposed grocery building and therefore,near the residential units immediately west of the site is the one troublesome aspect of the plan. Both elements,the trash enclosure and delivery area, can create undue disturbances even if they don't violate noise standards and should be relocated to elsewhere on the site. 3. While the applicant is concerned about"hiding"the retail or bagel bakery behind proposed Building A, appropriate signs will reveal it to passersby. In addition,the view angle into the site and the rear of the site should not be that adverse to exposing this facility. In any event,the applicant should not be permitted to foist off the noisiest aspects of this development on the most sensitive surrounding properties,the residential units to the west of the site. While there are also residential units north of the site,the proposed westerly location exposes the most residential units to the detrimental noise impacts of delivery trucks, engine noises,backup beepers and the trash collection and disposal. The recommended condition of testing for noise does not even contain any possible remedy if noise is a problem. Unfortunately,noise standards are defined to minimize injurious noises but don't necessarily reach noises that might be nuisances or disturb the tranquillity expected of residential settings. While urban life requires some compromises in these situations,planning principles generally require avoiding such impacts if possible. Both the trash bin and the delivery bays are situated in the least Carl Colson Olympic Associates Co. Jnion Plaza Shopping Center File No.: LUA-97-034,SA May 19, 1997 Page 7 • desirable location on the site and should be moved. While the applicant noted that flipping the floor plan might"hide"the separate retail space, it provides better protection for the residential buildings west of the site. Clearly,using appropriate signing,the retail space can be brought to the attention of shoppers. 4. The shopping center is compatible with the,designation of the site for suburban center uses including clustered and stacked retail and office uses. The proposed uses are compatible with the Zoning Code and provide the appropriate setup and meet the height and parking requirements of the City.. Fire and building code compliance will be determined with the submission of actual building plans. 6. The internal pattern and orientation of the buildings coupled with the landscaping and setbacks minimizes impacts on the site. 7; As already noted,the proposed layout would have exposed too many,residential properties to the potentially negative impacts of noise from delivery trucks and garbage disposal. Those impacts are unacceptable when "flipping"the floor plan for Proposed Building B would reduce the impacts to the most sensitive surrounding land uses,the residential complex west of the site. 8. The development of the site, as conditioned, should not have a negative:impact on propertY values. 9 The emergency access driveway as well as the two driveways and fairly rectangular parking arrangement should be efficient vehicular circulation. 10. The two-story height of the highest buildings coupled with the interior parking arrangement and the setbacks should permit adequate light and air to enter the site and surrounding properties. 11. The utility infrastructure and roadways surrounding the site are more than adequate to serve the development. In addition,the ERC has proposed mitigation measures to offset impacts on transportation corridors and fire safety. 12. In conclusion,with the exception of the delivery and trash enclosure,the proposed site plan appears to provide a positive development for the subject site. DECISION: The site plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall "flip"the floor plan and delivery and trash enclosure plans for Proposed Building B and relocate the delivery area and trash enclosures to the east side of Building B. 2. The applicant shall comply with the ERC mitigation measures. 3. The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide a 20 foot wide clear drive for access around the building exterior. The revised site plan shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department,prior to issuance of a building permit. Carl Colson Olympic Associates Co. Union Plaza Shopping Center File No.: LUA-97-034,SA May 19, 1997 Page 8 4. The site plan shall be revised to provide a pedestrian walkway across the parking lot,with the location coinciding with the corridor separation between Buildings C and D. The site plan revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division,prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. The applicant shall provide for pedestrian access onto the site from adjacent properties if it is practical. The applicant shall work with Development Services Division staff to identify potential pedestrian connections and shall revise the site plan. The revised site plan, or a written justification as to why it is not practical to accomplish, shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division,prior to issuance of a building permit. ORDERED THIS 19th day of May, 1997. FRED J.KA MAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of May, 1997 to the parties of record: Peter Rosen Larry Cross Neil Watts 200 Mill Avenue South 701 Dexter Avenue N,#301 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98109 Renton,WA 98022 Carl Colson Ricky Chang Stan Piha 701 Dexter Avenue N,#301 3010 77th Avenue SE,#201 2101 4th Avenue,#250 Seattle, WA 98109 Mercer Island, WA 98040 Seattle,WA 98121 Daniel Nieder Helen Rivera 5363 South Kenyon Street P.O.Box 1149 Seattle,WA 98118 Renton,WA 98057 TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of May, 1997 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Administrator Members,Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Art Larson,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren,City Attorney James Chandler,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Mayor's Executive Assistant Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Pursuant to Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m..June 2. 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review Carl Colson Olympic Associates Co. Union Plaza Shopping Center File No.: LUA-97-034,SA May 19, 1997 Page 9 by the Examiner within fourteen 14 days from the date of the Examiner'srequest shall set forth decision. This ( ) the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may,after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal bed filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.0.0 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. If'the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the,Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. ` }Y• Y 'K I'N ti L_, AACNITECTURE r '1 ��,yC\' ENGINCERM �� /�a�—� Y�e 1N Y — I MANNING /II�I trr' Y,� IN YERYpellikri_TRFF.r'A,F122AR "" a �� R-8 EUENT 701 DEXTER AVE.AYE.N. • ,....... TK aTE fD�ARL DEYELORTENTI 16 WOODED I I I I - "" IRE I I R R-10 5EA1TlE.WA.9e109 MO O:WAIES A M RAL a ALDER DOLL•LA6 FR ^� MO KPLOGTC DIE 10 Ex1E/tlM SITEmORG I (206)285-4300 i,,,,...,4 p'-O.ODE• ..ow TK EPISTNS TREES WLl BE REPKNED.REFER I I I I K IN SMUT /' LA•C6CAPK -; TO THE NEW LA/O6CAPPG PLAN FAR NROR1ATIDN Y mli 1O/ffR MO ALL.RE E NEW TAM! PLANT ,Et " R-24 OLYMPIC WiERORR TO❑NL DdtTJG S 'I '•�"^• G AOPALe.REFER TO GNL PLAN FOR Mil R-10II= - ASSOCIATES COPOCXATIw w E TANNO MO GRADN7 ME COMM PIORIATCTLC 0 M P A N Y NEW tartarm Ma REraH/G BALLS rn 1 /%% %/i____%////V//% /P1/4 K c} — k' RI-I II ��` V pUSTS6 OD NEE CCNTCURS,UTILITIES UNION PLAZA 5,0'IA NURTURES. el AV'.0�/ n =Ell\ 11111111/ . I 1 T le1�1�1 1t1�1r1�1 1 _ 4 G5 I. _ 3904 NE 4th STREET i �i i I �� I ® i i�s R 8 C8 RENTON.WA — , `� e.io "i /eAw .... ,^; Twee ,_.o/ /'fr �\ e'•o•WOE CS 0 : \ \` ��Z 1,0:, 4 L APPG . i �\\ a E R-10 a..: I ..�, O �:s \ ' VICINITY MAP \ °=00' 4°°' ...,, \�\� \ 3 SCALE 1' •zoo'-o' LP 572'77-- 600. ® I7,; • CRT a PAMPA X000 aJp6fCATIEN CA NN a \ TOTAI BOOM POOTAGE a TK aM. JS.AAB AP. n Ate 6—aZ7� 6.•4 ,lip )J i TOTAL 6Pwe FOOTAGE O Tic eaD•oe. SITE PLAN ' 'd0!'.70 • TOVAL MAT. DOOM PAT °ADM MT ^^^1G 9' SOs SP. l011 SP. \ S I = fE_ ¢ WAIL TOTAL SU816f. � - mo 4 PFIa MAC! er VV E OULDM-A• F6.757 . \\ .l: DJLDRO Y' 'AO 0F. OF AT AMATO WWII \ �q i RESTMRAVT TOTAL 165 Sf. \ .- • -• 1.'•• ••• 14'-O • 14'-O •,.a. t , 4ftDK.L' 11..J16l. � \ �..- PROJROT TOTAL EPA.6F. !TAP. TOTAL BOOM POWAY R ELD&roonmrte. opt)!F. EOILDING"A" � I re rnR.GcoLm co aABe• Us 2nd FLOOR 'rip- eve• MOO ® `� - — — ��.TiPi•j'i�'`a I I 6 PM(W M4LTw 4 e e"'" tJ,n. 0 AB RLL a1E APAae PRVAOrD m • C0'>•ACr bII APACE/PIV.•OFD 1 B.-O.ODE I`Dr;I I : O r1•-1•.Wer, ��/ / T MOY ACC!•LELE APACE! 1 d �„//A •A.4•.. 1��E WMA11••• --.s■:Y._L 4=Ay/��. ' PMRIG MACE TOTALTEER WO PM MOIRDI, )4 • MEI i'sp POUR FOOTAGE erOLR LOT LOCO tG lit IS MVP*HAFl,0.E � —— KW EMIR - B.6ll L K ENi51rRG p' MOM FOOT AK YFUBMWLP ALL OTTER LATCCG 1 BP. — T€T B LPL EX161PG 610Rt 6T61M1 MillElliagar Y KY MOTE I tlRDM E TT %NAT 6'MLR LPL !AVM EATER LPLF'IRGFr11EO MDR)KIT,1T M NO• Kw S'-O'470E 666EYU1IC WOOED p[LG/LltB D'••ISCESS • 5.•REAR •'• •M...PP. Q 6016.01 KO S'•O'R.W TEG 61 5P __ !TOMCOD 6EDA0F9 n•.,1RL1R p••aDo �_al^O 1 SITE PLAN �� N Nd ECTME 1- =40•-0- �j_1 3 PROJECT DATA 3/14/97 09.35 on IRCHTECTURE _ _ ___ _ __ - r 1 __ _ WAIGEUENT A j '01 MIER AVE.N. �LITTIE.WA 98108 +IIt111ll11 Illllllln'ii�1��Il1llllll;;ii'iIIIIIIIIIIIiii��IIIII1IIIIII IIIIIIi lllllllli11�111111111111111111111lll .300iiilli 11 l�l ��lllll�lllll��_ ___llll�___________ llllll____'lllll__________ ____________________llll.._. ., (206)2�` O L Y Al P I C IIIItTICTI l •' ASSOCIATES • ; ■■■■ ■■■■ t E--_■■■■ ■■■ 11.41'7�T Ii1ia T ■Ei�-■�>f�.a�i■-1�— •e�A_■�i! ., Irm?n:a0cmr�_: n1m-ca.s—T=.r.Yr�r.�-r.-,-rr■T° r rr. I ,.,_,E_: n-� rn mo=F-or toAT!tM iemmimm.=_ ■ ■.,•■_ gl. r COMPANY 9 -e1 lier'lI ai i1_I■ 'ihii it 1i ■11ii'i -_i ii_f.Ts.. eiI i ■i-1 ■1 i■ j r1_I■ ■.. I-I 1_. 11 -1 -„=11_ I 11 11 _:-.11--=11 1 II 11 11 :I • MEIZE UNION PLAZA 1 BUILDING "A". FRONT ELEVATION SHOPPING SCALE 1/18' = I'-0• CENTER & OFFICES 111111111.. 3004 NE 4th 81 � +,• RENTO! 111001111I111111111 1111'=_-"'°°MIMMill!f"IIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIi .tR.. I 1st 1 in■L;a�"r-,_ 3- ••••u•p�Zl IE�_ ___ :'m'' o.2 = •-• 1 lir - =1 1 11� '€1_--g__;F_-�131R1_1-.�-clil= ALL TEOLACAL EDDRIDO 411 • I. 9 I —,'.a_111_I■ :,�I_I-HELM r■■■1 _e■■■,`iENNIia= =1■1'11 111=__ ' Flo t®:: _ = 1.. _� _, __ - =—LL!1:3= _ . A AS AT REAR NR?OFTQ RECESSED } :: a_�_ s� AREAST ALL AAT R EAARR SEE OF MICE 111 itillh I. 10,..tit fto---- ----------------\..„_.___.i.._ 2 BUILDING "B" FRONT ELEVATION -.../1— SCALE I/18' = 1'-0' II Of 1 E LEASE SPACE T l I •1111111... _ -_ ...Alibi... ..11111,.. '.1111111'Ill �'Al I U• � •a/ 1I111111111111,.. AH11111111 I, a- II1IIIIIIIII F I�.. . jj ill €aii !' = Eflell7 , �� I ' ' l•� � 11^11 .( 11 € •~ ■I■1 ,� =_- € :� : � : _ i. t BUILDING _ T''� ELEVATIONS BUILDING "C" BUILDING "P" SCHEMATIC BUILDING SECTION 3 BUILDING "C" & "D" FRONT ELEVATION 4 SHOWING HVAC EQUIP. LOCATION SCALE 1/18- = I'-0' SCALE I/8" = I'-0' COLCEPRETNISIEDIS IETAI.-RNFrG / E GREEN OR L TEr9E FETALDUF GUT�� AT POC R. PAWED Elf!SIGN DM0 �.. t Inot C PRpN'JED FETAL PCCr,G CLEAR IdLATED ...■AI • CQQ1 ID DE&EDI OR �1,1j1I I PIOBN•!ED TETAL MCf)G GLAZN'i DTSTEII ._ . -_ . „ .a ERNE FETAL GRAY C0.011 TO BE CREEL OR PANTED Elf!.1Q;/1 .. ►DOD CPMLR I TERSE METAL DRAT \ T u 1 .1 03.12/93 .. .13 pw PTSN5IED METAL FASCIA. �"FACE OE UNION PIATA� CnneuMld-rLAAA.A]-1 mTTERSODWEI _�II11��I'��IIlil IIIIIIII��15�_ _.41 PFEfNLEOFETALr.1GA. \�lUBOII!)8 �_ \ _ WEEPS AIO SW T � — PANTEDIOCD"1EZEDOAtD _I111MI��=1� 1��==1w PANTED LIXO FREE BOARD Fa atARNdLaTEOOLAi.GDTDmt _I=�■■.=■■■.=_■ ■ - • PANTED UM MGM OAK, _i __ PANTED WA.DON OATS 1.11111111117M_ . xtrt PACE OE ==L ATIJRECRAFT =� JO'S CARDS ,_c� C. SPLIT FACE au J DELI _ li PIE NEED FETAL AAN+G."4".G -"'EIII11111 IIIII 1=1!11 1111111111110 51111 REaMFD FETAL � — EN � t 1 I I-1 �.• r• R.I.I- Iprrr. —''s I-'- L__.. -_ M 1♦ 'C 0 : '. E I C N T T DPLRfaaa" =Ff��(�f�l '9Jf�fM[��53=II SPLIT FACE CM --^ _l = Eli- " .. RECESSED re/AL lxvePaR _=��`I;'.a_=9Rn'7__= SPLIT FACE CTa EETao �s� _ _ ..��:-•. -•� 9601 CLEAR laLATEO OLADG DTDTE"— ■„i u •• ^r �a DPLrt FACE au I- /; =- ; ! IPLrc FACE CM —�,_ �i� 1_,= 1 1 .. m vL.. i==—fi IJil�=o � �a--s�Q�� BMATERIALUILDING DESIGNATIONS ARE SHORN ON PORTIONS OF BUILDING 'AT AND 'B'. 5 TYPICAL BUILDING MATERIALS BUILDING DE k DESIGNATIONS USE TILE SAYE METAL ROOFING SYSTEM, "e FACE B.. AND �� .eo SCALE 1/8" = I'-0' -CLEAR WINDOW GLAZING SYSTEM AS SHOWN IN BUILDING 'A' AND 'B'. • I I KETera�e RET•NNc i E 1•litSIt i RED CLOAK- I I »-Fa•!EK P..OTNI• GALL N E oval )-U[eTFIE1 JaO C[DM • I I• • o • SEED---}•, •N.^' 1-OQYiAe N.. ..._...._...,.._.__.__._..__.) CATIO - •' `i wit/ ,�.��t "�� >A• SPECIFICATIONS I' .Aw ii �:,'.J .�. si:F,.v...•c• .:......:........ _.. .. .-. .. _ _ .. _., _ �::';�'•'v G g..� Nr� l __ .._..r. = =�. I 1 ,I �.`W T/�`_-^r r Y 1.....E .Je2Tf .1,T7, I I I I ' .:vi. 'Ir. �I.).KNIKNi.00 ' �1��1��11'��V�'�'��•OOJVGyO� • .r._. ......-.... .....r.....r_ I I I �d II I .I i �I�J rpE•M •)'OG ...Et"SWX� f- ,--T n•T.t!RIS 1l.•10G.AiDTNId 000 t/i \ ................................................• � •'ED ) _` �n:erKPrieocD P.C. Lenun.WIPP. I ail / ` I w•p`1 i1 i G WEATHER•]h'oG waoeG� tt• Tr=� ~+� ... I I II i.I I .•) ' C D•.1T.KCIe-1 I RETGL I }a-OROIOCOI ^_w w r- I rx I I 1kf ., r,�� JJR•ER•a.OZ. I __.�:}:__- ..rr•_ III I P•.r.EAT.ER x•ar•r.•r a••oD P•.c• K..oDooENow1 n•Nr.eElat �, _OUJOGO P.C. 1/ 7- =�. r:: "'I! )O�+OI ` :It:. uEAr•ER•}.}•04 -/ )h•DG C WI )]•.EAfiE° h OG ;a )• • ._.__.�._. ��•w�r...... 1 1. • y,y c ' �'•11n' -- --- --- --- --- --- - -- -•>nc= c • , �rI,r�' In Nr�, I 1'i T f �`f I R �1 ClvildEEE IL ' `' ..._.__ �$ a . I C.EKRi -'I.ITN01:)YTERER •E•T•EK•1h'DG >• YLee- A`,a, GEE >rIRE )DG •` _n.A.N wr.E - .�: - ,_ T---__ • RNODCODORC1 LAAK t. ��ww11 1'��•�� ,•o°.. )h'oG as-!i oi. t' �i'.i�" N II `�Ic e' All O.Nre3.e,e r � _'. In•Nr.Eu a,: Oh, ,,• �£F'�\'�' .r^^ql ,�.. ... .N....r... CC II II )- r ,�:��L,�� rgc►E ..RRED EDTE. CEDAR rr=--:_._ .__._.-._.._..._ I Il:CLEKLA(G?LL[GT'� �• • ill_. Isj MK/ _. .�.. Z T ' /I �I `�IOe•+EL cc.GOLLT Ta•,ELLERI'...LT _ _ �.....+wr.r..,i.._. 0 II . I r I`SF _ IROLERND PEAR _ ' _..__ • Z< •r oG •)•oG 7 a•rrDRu4Lm I z I' Y 1 i ►: Or II N 1 II i I I �. I I I r e ri -,,:ANAN KFNK.G.E , .• _.-,._PAPA.., W_r O N jI•I ( - -1� -1---n• i ecra, -I- I I I ::: { n•,.T.eEle,s-k;0117 •R• OwENDRO t ` ; 1' e Nr.->-,(' ' r i r F I a •RE CEDAR> I•w 4s •+._...•..r a �� I Il--_ -t✓�i I I i I II I I I I II I I -� • �. ..rr • J z • I K,�Td I11 N..ELLERI•MOLL, pl•'AsliuONT WArEREK' X•KLLEIO'WILLT ]].S ELL1 D'O�' \ �w ETA w.RE,--.iii 11 •r oG aPIREA.roc .r oG Ddnar.r oG �1 I ! I,. :I:°�L ► .1 II• `L - "'-- -----'- - h1t- ftLO I I• 4:is:I I I I I' ' �. Tri•'NT.J IK�G•RIL] RN 3 Ole. G.�R01 �Q�i.• .r I 1 ,-1}1.'Nw•YwroD PINK' n•'ANAN*aJKLKE' 11•>911•rl'dN' QE21, -- •)h'OL O^QQT•\!,�PAPA S i r� 1• paw•EAr•ER 1a:.PR JiWD P•K' RNODODENDRGN� CKRRT i f.•,'�N��•••r'iiri� -_. •.e. I Bed I A/ •T1'OC. K•PNER.I1h•oL •r\•oG \,_p Qi �$J'ii':AtAN' i'i.Lla =Y�N •I L'ta'� I -ye II I II Y 1E. �j '.. I.l-- ,� n�i eE>a I I "'�r s L 2 I I* � �� ,! r uuEEP.n ALaw_�/ ";• ,•..� LR I I -4 ► I�4). CEDAR iI 'rl -. _ • _ >-GREEN 9.eROADI•Ir. i1 y1 _ i1� G1.YLTO -'� �I '- 1.•PIGI.',me'PIERI!-� r b REAT R i PI'O ff'' ''J�'/� .W�PEK•e'OL. .••i•.a r TKE,. »••e••R•r.]ooD P•.c• •>h•oG nAPLE 91► ,&7�0,� I 'LAIiREL '1 .Ed1NER ••1N'OG j N.K•NK•+iiCX )IQ RANT,*AM RTNINO DUAL ' 1.'OC �q1y 1t•'`- WLD)G C' I^O>.:dLdL S`.1.• •)•OL. ,. .1 111i1iIJ - MUM.. le-D.u.a&CM. (_� >o-!•LAL )•°L'G/Lt,E � II .- }.• •)•ol. SEED I♦+, 1-Dar.L•a PM _ -aPram•G Iw .S 3.41 n•N 1l.�KAxR T•.+oTN1A -u E*�L�l vw l SE a N11I7y !? 1 __ _ ! .. ..u...-RADA...., ..mo,. n +J _ �• iiE PAPA... PAPA, .,.:... ,..........•...........•........_. __ _ Q 1� t '' a•nElTERN �r� W wit L••��i•;• rTu\"••r..•r' ]1••TrRIDC 0E0lTER' n).:•s•TrCIC •• .. r Q• v. I_I I /_T1•.ALAL I`•-1-vEDTE--- I \ •.).a.COODENOR01 G �. .. •1:1 a I. •>'OC ..LCK[Ki WE CIVLI - r PLANT MATERIAL LIST _1,� - wry_ -l..i_ I on I eorANlcet NAM I cc•.+o.1 NAnE I Bile.rm•G I P. Ei> Z Cq W AGER PALIIATIJ, 4REEn JAPANESE'APLE 1•GAL. D.O • _ 0 21 --.,.............•• r • AGEK IE STRIP T0D awxT• ,RED a>uer RfO r•PLE r CAL.n.14.NT em•>o•0C. DM"•]'A"""DETAE r Mu NORTH < �'OlCRCt..Ro,oua.meo P_P3+•LE EFr•G eLAaK,:_ccpA11 r-s NT e.e .LAWN EDGE DR. --',K a- 411 it w6i•u?g3R.L•-r•rou•Nzw• ;a4A.i=JJ,.sL01EKt0 G0ERRT 2'CAL•0••r1•GT.5'5 DR•GI' Trt5 �U • . •r--. y n nEu0ors.40A rENncau o01_r_I.m INK _r=�e'D _.. .._.-�'� » 1 A cdru cu:nca xucr SA OLer 1...0%cc*Lw4 PE•K ];o�•i1-r•nCL.a.LITG,G.DR•.N• >o_-1" w. L•I �'0 !a,{ "- PLANT MATERIAL LIST 1'L'� SCALE: I. 0 30' '< W N lb .a.....-. r..r ww+ 11 1p dKCTOITMN.LOFUvd-URII K•NIKNiiCK IC.A4 CPO.•)'OZ. `OTTI pOidNICAL mart I CO'•'rON NAPE I VIE rlydC1`G I r-7 a r1- • La)CR.C•cur.•'YI1K6CVD P.C.WtrA 00 PMC'NE•iNER 148L.C01T,•]N'OG. m �5. 4NaT.ERIA Is STELA axAL 14d1.G(}IT,•)'OC. le PMl.D LM.•OCERAI411 KR LIMO,OTTO LNfi4L'L•?A000 ]I'.]._yT p.D•.'OG UJ sNe<t---- y 11 NE}210?GALLn'..ELLA DORE,ETELIA D'ORO DATLIyT I CAL.CCNT,•]'OL. K RNOCODENDIGOV YYA1[At1C1''•NA..U61K.KF'c tlpWOORp1 er.2.•NT,5.5 r] '0. tF _..: w'� :•.s ]:)_I�Ex CRENATA 0ELLCRI' .ELLERI...OLLT 1 GAL.COAT.•)'OL 9 ). RGOWOORG I'I0DE LEAVER TRDE 1ECCTER'R:6000PsORD.11••]••Nr ,?••3.1.OG 5. u4osn•to r Q 0 µ AMPCRJ!SAeINA'5.0ApnOPr pROADn00r.JWIPER a GAL.CONE•1.OL A7 )1 NC•Tl1A REF+EIIANA DWARF aK•MI• !G4.COW•}'OC. 1• �� •'• •R v Z I_-1 PAWNS IWO RAIR01 RTio. 11a P..OTINI•PRA•ERI .RATER PNOTNIA ) .e. CON}.•a'OG ]ID ]P•OE•R n214DA,r0.0 WIMP'ANT1101T WIE RE*.WIRED 1 GAL.C011••>'OC ,• ii�.Y`Oma• Q RT, L PIERI!JAPN]1Cd MR NRF' it,.VFW Pi1R3! 11.1.•NT,5.5•)h•or_ T4u!5ACCAT•REPANDE'! SPREADING DGO.:VFW A'•N'!PR•3%•06 r- J O O ::::::::::>.......................................:.: ::::.......:>::>::::>::<:> `CE`BY`MAILI;„>:>:: < <> On the F..514D day of , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Carl Z. Celsov- 0ITI ptc. ASSoc. Cow%rawy 1 "rZ�cic.�.t O av\LI hotrtIn u c,t 1'vc if 4S 'Staves rile, K e S "rhV@Sl1Meh� CodrinaK,y 1 tie.le - i eva- fie G "Ivw e i rune6s Dar\;e-t f, 4er (Signature of Sender) s .vvdba- 'A Se•aa •Cr-- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS - COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that SA-Atbie/4 it . signed,this • instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the't.),*Taiid -purposes mentioned in the instrument. 9,6'6 . • • Dated: 51E7.ry �iq / (i L/�! , Notary Publi• r and fort e State of WasUirig;p1,r via', 7 . Notary (Print) 11/0-Qa 7 7- :J.� &�L � • My appointment expires: L0 /qR' P J �' 1•ryl H ..••• Project Name: • Uv‘tu -t Pk 5\ncorpevn Ce vti r- Project Number: LUA °CI_034,SP%.60P NOTARY.DOC •iiiiiiiii:::::::::::::::;::':Y:::Y::�:�:ii::i::::ii:::::i::i::::::::::;::;;:;:;%?;::::ii5i::5::: (4 :? IE' AM.I NE.RM':LIERI :::::'::':'::::::; ::::::::::::' :::::::::iiiili : irE1 ±G.O MM ENC1 N+G>/�T.:9>...:...::A..... .::::.::::::::::::::................................................................................................................................................. ;c ; NCIL:CWAMBER <:>>. E.0 :CAD:>FLOO.. ' RENTONaVtUNIG1PA..::B.U.[LD NG:::::::::::::::::::. iilficappt <` end`'t t``n essay l tl a>t rder> rt<`'''h <:»> ri did;::e>;<'o�`a`�'�`tca tot'€` tdc>oni `'''in `s' lstet€�re..a r PROJECT NAME: UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-034,SA,ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of four(4) buildings for a total area of 80,496 square feet with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. Location: 3904 NE 4th Street. AGNDA.DOC City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: May 13, 1997 Project Name: Union Plaza Shopping Center Applicant Contact/ Carl Colson Address: Olympic Associates Co. 701 Dexter Avenue N, #301 Seattle, WA. 98109 Owner/ Ricky Chang Address: Northwest Prompters 3010 77th Avenue SE, Suite 201 Mercer Island, WA. 98040 File Number: LUA-097-034 Project Manager: Peter Rosen • Project Description: The applicant is seeking site plan approval for a retail shopping center and offices. The proposal includes 4 buildings for a total building area of 83,496 square feet. 346 parking spaces are proposed. Access would be via 2 driveway entries off NE 4th Street. Project Location: 3904 NE 4th Street ' \\\ --- -� � .... a pC � -- --- NE T itati6T1-.-"--1 V ^�`bth pt. I NE 6th PLACE g a R-8 R-8 R- I R-10 t E 6th STREET R-8 MO 18 R-10 R-24 ! / 1 C5 RM-I R-10 I NE 5th STREET R-10 Z I _ RI -c \sltE 1 � z cs �! Ocs - -kN Z F NE 4th STREET Cs R-8 Cs 1 NE 3rd AGE I 10_1 I 1 I M � i J . . i City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Heating Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 2 of 12 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record:: Ricky Chang, Northwest Prompters 2. Zoning Designation: Center Suburban (CS) 3. Comprehensive Plan Center Suburban(CS) Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: Vacant, undeveloped 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single family residences, Village on Union East: Commercial, vacant, Puget Power Substation South: Commercial, Eastway Center West: Multi-family apartments 6. Access: NE 4th Avenue 7. Site Area: 5.85 acres, 254,698 s.f. 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: N/A New Building Area: 83,496 s.f. Total Building Area: 83,496 s.f. C. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation 2290 11/21/66 • Comprehensive Plan 4498 2/20/95 Zoning Code 4405 6/7/93 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: Water: Watermain extension, fire hydrants and DDCV assembly's will be required to meet current fire codes/regulations. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034, SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 3 of 12 Sewer: Extension of sanitary sewer system will be required to proposed buildings. Surface Water/Storm Water: Storm drainage facilities will be required in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City. 2. Fire Protection: Provided as per City of Renton Ordinance 3. Transit: Metro Transit provides service along NE 4th Street and Union Avenue NE. 4. Recreation: Kiwanis Park is located within one-half mile of the subject site. 5. Other: Site is located within Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Zoning Code-4-31-10.2 Suburban Center Zone 2. Parking and Loading Ordinance-4-14 F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element--Centers —General Policies: Policy LU-82 -- Promote the clustering of Center uses and discourage the development of strip commercial areas. Policy LU-89 — Create Centers which support a citywide transit system and encourage pedestrian access. 2. Land Use Element—Centers —Mix and Intensity of Uses: • Objective LU-Q — Encourage a wide range and combination of uses, developed at sufficient intensity to maximize efficient use of land, support transit use and crate an urban district. Policy LU-97 --Encourage multi-story office, commercial and multi-family uses. Policy LU-98 —Discourage single story suburban style development. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 4 of 12 Policy LU-100 — Mixed development within the same structure should include uses which are compatible with each other, i.e. office and certain retail uses with residential; office and retail; light industrial; and heavy commercial. 3. Land Use Element—Centers —Site and Building Design: Policy LU-102 — Site and building design and use should be oriented primarily toward pedestrian/people to maximize pedestrian activity and minimize automobile use for circulation within the center. Policy LU-103 — Existing residential and commercial development should be integrated as much as possible through alterations in parking lot,design, landscapes, signage, and site plan alterations as redevelopment opportunities occur. 4. Land Use Element—Centers —Circulation and Parking: Policy LU-108 --Vehicular circulation should be internal and access to adjacent streets should be consolidated. 5. Land Use Element—Centers —Center Suburban: Objective LU-T — Develop suburban centers which provide a wide range of consumer goods and services to an area which includes neighborhoods, but is smaller than the entire city. Policy LU-119 — Suburban center sites and structures should be more intensive in design and intensity (e.g. signage; building height, bulk and set-back; landscaping; parking)than with land uses outside the Center. Policy LU-120 — Promote the clustering of community commercial uses and discourage the development of strip commercial areas. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant requests site plan approval for a retail shopping center with second floor offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total floor area of 83,496 square feet. The building layout faces toward the interior parking area. Building A is oriented along a north/south axis on the west part of the site. Building A includes approximately 17,182 square feet of retail space and 9,287 square feet of restaurant space on the first floor, with 9,916 square feet of office area on the second floor. Building B is setback farthest from NE 4th Avenue at the north end of the site and parking lot. Building B is proposed to include a 22,427 square foot grocery store and 5,018 square feet of retail area on the first floor and approximately 3,000 square feet of second story office space over the retail portion of the building. Buildings C and D are oriented north/south along the east property line, with a 20 foot wide corridor separating the buildings. Building C is proposed as a 7,613 HEXRPT.DOC it a City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034, SA,ECF PUBUC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 5 of 12 square foot restaurant and Building D a 9,053 square foot restaurant. The maximum building height would be the 37 foot roof peak of the tower on Building B. Access to the shopping center is proposed via two driveway entries off NE 4th Avenue. These driveway cuts are separated by approximately 165 feet. The shopping center includes a total of 346 parking spaces to serve all the businesses. Sidewalks in front of all the buildings provide for pedestrian circulation through the shopping.center. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinanceand SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on April 15, 1997 the Environmental.Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated. 3 . COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the following mitigation measures were issued for the Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated. 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $41,857.92. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $142,068.00 (1,894.24 trips x $75 = $142,068.00). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. 3. The Construction Mitigation Plan shall be revised to restrict haul hours to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The revised Construction Mitigation Plan shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of Construction Permits. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into, the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-31-33 (D.) "The Hearing Examiner and City staff shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to HEXRPT.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 6 of 12 discourage creativity and innovation. The site plan Review criteria include, but are not limited to,the following:" GENERAL CRITERIA: (1) CONFORMANCE WITH 'THE 'COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS & POLICIES The proposed shopping center is located within the Center Suburban (CS) Comprehensive Plan designation and generally conforms to applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the CS designation. The objective of the CS designation (LU- T) encourages a wide range of consumer goods and services to serve neighborhoods, with a service area smaller than the entire city. The community commercial uses should be clustered to discourage development of strip commercial areas (Policy LU-119). Center Suburban sites should be more intensive in design than land uses outside the Center. The shape of the subject site is narrow and long, so the buildings are oriented facing inward to the parking area. This building layout gives the shopping center an interior focus, and together with the consolidated driveway entries, distinguishes the proposal from commercial strip development. The proposal appears to incorporate smaller commercial uses within the buildings, scaled to serve neighborhood needs. The project proposes second story offices over Building A and B which is consistent with the intensity and mix of uses envisioned for the CS designation. The building design incorporates varied roof lines and materials that are compatible with residential styles and appropriate for the character of a neighborhood commercial center. (2) CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS The following requirements and development standards contained in Section 4- 31-10.2 Center Suburban Zone (CS) of the Zoning Code [adopted June 1993] are applicable to this proposal Permitted Uses The subject site is zoned Center Suburban (CS). The proposed retail and restaurant uses are allowed as primary permitted uses in the CS zone. General office uses are permitted in the CS zone as secondary uses subject to the following conditions: 1) Size and location of these uses will be reviewed as part of site plan'approval; 2) The total gross square footage of these uses shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the gross square footage of the site. The proposal includes office uses on the second floor of Buildings A and B. Thus, retail and restaurant uses which are considered primary uses of the zone would be predominant in the proposal. A total of 12,916 square feet of office use is proposed which is equal to 5% of the gross square footage of the site. The office use complies with the conditions specified for office secondary uses in the CS zone. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034, SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 7 of 12 The applicant has revised the site plan legend indicating the square footage of the various uses proposed for the shopping center. This information is attached to the Hearing Examiner report. Size-The CS zone limits the maximum gross floor area of any single commercial use on a site to 65,000 gross square feet. Building B is the largest building in the proposed shopping center with a gross floor area of 30,445 square feet. Setbacks The CS zone requires a front/street building setback of a minimum of 10 feet and a maximum of 15 feet. The Building A is setback approximately 87 feet from NE 4th Street and Building D approximately 96 feet. The code allows the:reviewing official to modify the maximum setback standard through the site plan review process if the applicant can demonstrate that the site plan meets criteria as set forth in the code. The applicant has submitted a letter to justify their design exceeding the maximum setback requirement, and this letter is attached to the project report. The site plan criteria for exceeding the maximum setback follows: 1) Orient the development to accommodate the pedestrian and create a pedestrian environment through such measures as; providing pedestrian walkways, encouraging pedestrian amenities and supporting alternatives to Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) transportation, and; In a revised .site plan, the applicant has proposed a pedestrian connection linking Buildings A and.D to the sidewalk along NE 4th Street. However, there is no pedestrian circulation proposed through the parking lot. The overall layout of the shopping center would encourage customers to centrally park and walk between stores, creating an internal pedestrian environment consistent with Center policies. 2) Create an attractive and interesting streetscape with a strong and defined streetfront through such measures as; promoting visible landmarks, fostering distinctive architecture, mitigating the visual dominance of extensive and unbroken parking along the streetfront and modifying building orientation to offset large setbacks (e.g. using varied setbacks, locating separate smaller buildings near the streetfront), and; The applicant has proposed a landscape strip along the street frontage which is a code requirement and landscape islands along the front edge of the parking area, in order to provide a visually appealing streetscape and to break up the visual dominance of the parking area. The application did not include elevations of the sides of Buildings A and D which face toward NE 4th Street. These facades could be detailed to provide visual interest to better connect the buildings to the street. 3) Promote safety and visibility through such measures as; discouraging the creation of hidden spaces, minimizing conflict between pedestrians and traffic and ensuring adequate setbacks to accommodate required parking and/or access that could not be provided otherwise. The design of the pedestrian sidewalk connecting to the Buildings A and D crosses a narrow traffic aisle width and is well designed to minimize conflicts between pedestrian access and traffic. The Code also allows the Hearing Examiner to modify the maximum setback requirement if the applicant can demonstrate that the preceding criteria cannot be met; however,those criteria which can be met shall be addressed in the site plan: HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Heating Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 8 of 12 1) due to factors including but not limited to the unique site design requirements or physical site constraints such as sensitive areas or utility easements;or 2) one or more of the criteria would not be furthered or would be impaired by compliance with the maximum setback;or 3) any function of the use which serves the public health, safety, or welfare would be materially impaired by the required setback The applicant claims that Building D exceeds the maximum setback to provide an adequate setback from an existing building on adjacent property just east of the site. The existing building is almost adjacent to the lot line and'the greater setback is required in order not to undermine the adjacent building or construct a large retaining wall. No rear or side/interior setbacks are required for development in the CS zone. Special Setback Requirement - The subject site abuts a R-10 zone along the north boundary of the site. The code requires a minimum 15 foot setback with sight-obscuring landscaping where a CS lot abuts a residential zone. The proposal includes the required landscape setback in compliance with the code.provision. The setback is planted with Douglas Fir and Western Red Cedar on approximately 18 feet on-center spacing, with Salal as a groundcover/shrub layer planted 3 feet on-center. This planting should provide sufficient cover to meet the sight-obscuring objective of the code. Height - The CS zone allows a maximum building.height.of 50 feet. The proposal complies with the height limit. The maximum building height would be the 37 foot roof peak of the tower on Building B. Building A would have a-maximum building height of approximately 35 feet. The other buildings are proposed with lower heights. Lot Coverage - Maximum allowable lot coverage for buildings in the CS zone is 65%. The proposal would result in lot coverage of approximately 24% of the lot area, well below the maximum allowed. Parking Requirements -The City's Parking and Loading Ordinance allows for a range of required parking in shopping centers that applies to all commercial and office uses within the shopping center. The code requires a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. The proposal includes a total floor area of 83,496 square feet. Thus, a minimum of 334 and a maximum of 417 parking spaces are required by the code. The proposal includes a total of 346 parking spaces which is within the allowable range. Landscaping- Lots abutting public street in the CS zone are required to provide a minimum landscape strip of 10 feet. The applicant is proposing a 15 foot wide landscape strip along NE 4th Street, complying with the code standard. The landscape strip is includes an 18 inch high grass berm planted with Red Maple street trees spaced 30 feet on-center. The landscape strip is backed with 'Otto Luyken' Laurel shrubs. The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires that large parking lots over 10,000 square feet in size have a minimum of 5% interior landscaping. The proposal includes 7,772 square feet of interior parking lot landscaping which appears to meet the code requirement according to staff analysis. The landscape plan (Sheet L-1) includes a legend specifying the selected plantings, quantities, size and spacing. The landscape plan is appropriate for the site and the proposal. HEXRPT.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034, SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 9 of 12 (3) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES; The subject site abuts undeveloped residential property to the north (zoned R-10) and an existing apartment development on the west (Renton Crown Apartments). Building B is oriented with the back of the building toward the north property line,essentially buffering the north residential property:from activities and traffic impacts of the'shopping center. In addition, a landscape buffer required by the code along the north property line should be sufficient to mitigate impacts to future residential development north of the site. The truck loading area and trash area is proposed on the west side of Building B, facing the adjacent apartment 'development. There are concerns about noise impacts with the loading and trash area in proximity to the adjacent residential use. The applicant has proposed a 20 foot wide densely planted landscape buffer which would assist in mitigating potential impacts. In order to further mitigate potential noise impacts, staff recommends that the applicant record a covenant that would require a noise test to be conducted if there are reasonable complaints about noise from surrounding residences. This was also applied as condition of approval on.the expansion of the Safeway store on Union and NE 4th Street. The subject site is adjacent to commercial development on other sides and would not adversely impact those surrounding properties. (4) . MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE.PROPOSED..SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; The proposal would create an intensive commercial use on a site which is presently undeveloped and densely forested. This conversion of the site to a commercial development is not an impact that can be effectively mitigated. However, the proposal is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. The proposed site plan does not create adverse impacts on-site. There is adequate vehicular and pedestrian circulation within the site. A stormwater detention and water quality system will be required to meet City standards. (5) CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES; The proposed commercial development would likely conserve or strengthen area-wide property values. The site and building design complements existing development and provides a cohesive shopping center development. (6) SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION; Vehicular access to the shopping center is proposed via 2 driveways off NE 4th Street. Customer and employee circulation onto the site and within the parking lot area appears to function adequately. There is a truck loading dock and trash area proposed on the west side of Building B. This narrows the one-way drive aisle around the perimeter of the buildings to an 18 foot width. The Fire Department requires a 20 foot wide clear drive for access around the HEXRPT.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034, SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 10 of 12 building exteriors. The applicant should revise the site plan to provide a 20 foot drive width to meet Fire Department standards. As mentioned previously, the applicant is proposing walkways from the sidewalk along NE 4th Street following the fronts of Buildings A, C, and D. An east/west pedestrian connection across the interior of the parking area would improve pedestrian circulation through the site. Staff recommends that the site plan be revised to provide a pedestrian walkway across the parking lot, with the most appropriate location coinciding with the corridor separation between Buildings C and D. There may be opportunities to provide for pedestrian access onto the site from adjacent properties, rather than requiring pedestrians from surrounding properties to enter the shopping center only from the sidewalk along NE 4th Street. For example, there may be a practical connection to the Renton Crown Apartments located just west of the site. Staff recommends that the applicant provide pedestrian connections from adjacent properties if practical. (7) PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; The proposed building heights, setbacks and landscaping are appropriate for the provision of adequate light and air. The parking lot landscaping includes Flowering Cherry and Flowering Pear trees which would provide for limited shade once established, but for the most part, the appearance would be an open parking lot accentuated with landscaping. (8) MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; Noise, dust and odors may result with construction of the project. These impacts would be mitigated through measures described in.the Construction Mitigation Plan and with best management practices. The operation of the shopping center uses is not expected to create harmful or unhealthy conditions. Potential noise impacts of truck loading on adjacent residential uses have been considered and staff recommends that the applicant be required to conduct a noise test if there are reasonable complaints about noise from surrounding residences. (9) AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE; AND The project site is adequately served by utilities and roads necessary to accommodate the proposed shopping center. Police and Fire have indicated that adequate resources exist to serve the proposed uses. A previous report section provides further detail concerning availability of public services and facilities: HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034, SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 11 of 12 (10) PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The proposal would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight by improving an undeveloped parcel with a shopping center that is scaled to serve the neighborhood. The site and building design would complement surrounding development and would improve the aesthetic quality of the area. • it HEXRPT.DOC • • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Heating Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034, SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 12 of 12 H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Union Plaza Shopping Center File No. LUA-97-034, SA, ECF subject to the following conditions: (1) Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review.Committee Threshold Determination, prior to the issuance of a building permit. (2) The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide a 20 foot wide clear drive for access around the building exterior. The revised site plan shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department, prior to issuance of a building permit. (3) An east/west pedestrian connection across the interior of the parking area would improve pedestrian circulation through the site. The site plan shall be revised to provide a pedestrian walkway across the parking lot, with the location coinciding with the corridor separation between Buildings C and D. The site plan revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of a building permit. (4) The applicant shall provide for pedestrian access onto the site from adjacent properties if it is practical. The applicant shall work with Development Services Division staff to identify potential pedestrian connections and shall revise the site plan. The revised site plan, or a written justification as to why it is not practical to accomplish, shall be subjectto the approval of the Development Services Division,prior to issuance of a building permit. (5) The applicant shall record a covenant that would require a noise test to be conducted if there are reasonable complaints from surrounding residents concerning the truck loading area on the west side of Building B. The covenant shall be approved by the Development Services Division and/or the City Attorney prior to recordation. The covenant shall be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. II HEXRPT.DOC • • F.4%1 Architecture•Engineering•Value Engineering•Construction Management 701 Dexter Avenue North 1301 Seattle,Washington 90109 4 tel: (206)285.4300 DEVEI OPME�lT p, j, , , 1VrA � Fax (206)285-4311 CITY OF r:::.,T;!'i'".0 oLYMPit E-motoacinll.com A:50(IA1ES �"' COMPANY e 1'S April 9, 1997 RECEI Peter Rosen Project Manager City of Renton Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,Washington 98055 Re:Union Plaza Shopping Center Site Plan Approval LUA97-034,SA,BCF 3904 NE 4th Street Renton,Washington Dear Peter, p Thank you for romptly returning my call inquiring as to whether or nut any additional information would be required for our submittal for Site Plan Approval for this project.Per your request for clarifications on parking,building use,and setbacks,I have revised our site plan drawing to show the correct building use and parking analysis. site conditions and fireeP�ent With regard to the setbacks at the front property line,existing adjacent requirements made us realize that Building"A"and Building"D"should be located farther away from the property line(at the street)than the distance that the City of Renton Zoning Regulations requires. Building"D"is set back a distance of approximately 96'-0"from the property line,while Building"A"is set back approximately 86'-10"from the front property line.We preferred to locate Building"D"closer to the front property line,however we were prevented from doing this because of the close proximity of a retail building(on the adjacent site to the east) to the property line.The adjacent property to the cast slopes toward our site and the existing retail building on that site is located extremely close(1 to 2 feet away)from the shared property line.Had we located Building"D"closer to the front property line,we would have risked undermining the existing adjacent buildings foundation and we would have been required to create a very large retaining wall at this area, We felt that by locating Building"D"in its present location,vie would eliminate the undermining danger and this would reduce the visual impact that a large retaining wall would have on the street view of our property.It is my understanding that the reason for the City of Renton's setback requirement is to help create a more pedestrian"friendly"and visually appealing strectscape.To meet this goal,we have located landscape islands all along the front edge of our parking lot,both at the street(as required)and at the front edge of our main parking field In addition,we will add sidewalks and landscaped areas at the front of our property at both Building"A"and Buis "D"to create a more visually appealing and easier site access for pedestrians to our buildings. ji At Building"A",we located our building in its present location to meet the City of Renton Fire Department's requirement for fire truck access to all sides of this building.In order to"soften"the visual impact that a parking lot would create at this area,we have located landscaping peninsula's at each end of the parking area immediately south of Building"A",In addition,our landscape architect has place an 18" high berm(with planting)at the landscaped area adjacent to the front property line.This planting material on this berm is identified on the landscaping legend as 12 to 14 feet high red maple trees and 4(i ' i ,_l• c.T•a PPP•nkt Wd20:2 L66S'6 'ddtl r iVt 2 feet high laurel.We feel that this landscaping will create a visually appealing edge/screen to the parking lot area which was created by the Fire Department's requirement for access to all sides of Building"A". In talking with you earlier,you mentioned that our Site Plan Approval would be viewed more favorably by members of the Environmental Review Committee if we were to improve pedestrian access to the buildings on the site.Enclosed is a copy of the partial plan that shows the new sidewalks and planting areas that have been added per your suggestion.I have also eliminated a parking space in front of Building"C"and Building"IY'and have added an access walkway from the parking lot to the central part of each building,'I have also enclosed a partial plan which shows this revision.I have included a revised Project Data chart which shows the correct number of parking spaces and the parking ratios which were used in calculating the required number of spaces.The original Project Data did not include the 3,000 square feet Office area at the upper level of Building"B"and this revised Project Data Chart correctly shows this revision. Peter,I hope that this letter communicates our intentions for varying from the setback requirements,as well as our efforts to create the visually appealing streetscape that the City of Renton desires for property in this building zone.Please contact me if you need revised Site Plans which show all of the revisions mentioned above.If I can be of any further assistance,please feel free to contact me,Thank you very much. Best • .gards, C J.Colson AIA CJC/tbm in,-•f-11 I Wd20:2 L66S •6 "ZldH APR. 9. 1997 2:02PM nu JJCJ ✓ • -----IL ,. eJ Q-.) .�. is -�\;; \\.`.\\\.:`\;\\,, \ - ilC , .f:',.:..::i:-2-7dVs\ ‘.\\' \s's dier\014'\'‘‘‘ .\\\.\\ss:4. "Irlif, el I 0-.It Z 11' f)•-• * r 1 4::•::..:............:.....:.....:......:.....,:..a u.70.:/\r r IP;.,\\s\s::1 \\``��`�'\\\�:�: .;.,...,:".\s\\. 01 1#ill .�vdwo' • _j_i i.,i,E \..s..:..\ %./j":*:• N L, t, N.\\\s`\Ns. ma 'N. ` InvdWdJ •••• J 177dWD7 I 1/ • \\\ \ `\ \ `\ u \ 11 ,P1Zx16 ICZx,6 En)(16 9 " ''' � • •;�.••\:\:.�.:'•: '�:._._.:.:�,,,_, Ott r`-•\..\�\\\\\ \ \, `� I \. .\ V\,. ss I rrr / :-:. •..\\ \� \.. \ 1 sn'duon I.. A \`\\\\\\�, , \ Y n . i 9 li D Z 1-' *•S: \•�`� ' I =WC? I Kistzt Ati,.._ 1F, R•, • \�•\.\�`��\\ 9 -'9"24'-0". 4E'-ro" 24'-0' 46;"-ro" 24'-0 ...) -• 7) Z4'-0' 710, �'\'' �\ . \. ;\; ., {; app_�-p11 Wfa=LR.� pip �,1 9UA A►Ya •�, 9 g 1 LI�ITPYl7 6iTE , ` ', `� .. C99 I1 k'/ 67 :{titiF:{ 11 p� 9.20 CUT9!TTaCiC _ • L S ARS 7 \ ® 6 CARS I 9 0` n 9 CARS a 9'x20' 8'-6" x i6'� ry ',CARS . ''•///' ://z>,'/,./•////''.; ,/•7 :'''' ... , ,./,,y./ /, , 2/ ••/ /WV /.%f/// . ,.,,„y."''', .4 • IIISVIII WM /Wow-7 . • HOLE T . — - - —0 __.- — —a`�—NEW 8° SEWER LINE )RM SYSTEM N.E. 41-H AVE. 9 �� J`XISTI>`tG 12" WATER LINE E InNEW 6 SEWER LINE m .� ; ^,�_ m -0' WIDE SIDEWALK ' N. -0' PLANTING STRIP ti m m 6 Q t • CITY OF RENTON.ZONING CLASSIFICATION CS TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE BITE: 254,698 SF. TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE 1311ILDING5= NAIL SPACE BUILDING s "A" 11,182 SF. BUILDING "B" 5,018 5F. RETAIL TOTAL 22,200 5F. OFFICE SPACE BUILDING "A" 9916 SF. BUILDING "13" 3,000 SF. OFFICE TOTAL 12,916 SF. RESTAURANT SPACE BUILDLN "A". 3,281 S.F. BUILDING "C" 1,513 SF. BUILDING "D" 9,053 SF. RESTAURANT TOTAL 25,953 SF. GROCERY SPACE FUILDING "8" 22,421 S.F. PROJECT TOTAL 83,496 SF. TOTAL- SQUARE FOOTAGE OF$LDG.FOOTPRINTS•. 61,293 S.F. PERCENTAGE OF LOT COVERAGE: 24% PARK1NCz ANALYSIS u OPP CENTERuE THE PAI� *NCs REQUIREMENTS ED WI � I EMENTS SHALL BE THAT FOR A 514OPP1146 CENTER.OUR PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE BASED UPON 5E11i.EEM 4 AND B SPACES PER TNOU3AND SGx1ARE FEET OF SPACE. 53,496 5F. DIVIDED 157 1000 = 83.496 83.496 TIMES 4 SPACES PER THOUSAND = 334 SPACES REQ. FULL SIZE SPACES PROVIDED 312 (9'-0" x 20'-0") COMPACT SIZE SPACES PROVIDED 23 (8'-6" x I6'-0") HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SPACES 1 (PER WAG. 5120 STANDARDS) PARKING SPACE TOTAL 342 (4.1 SPACES PER 1000 SF.) SQUARE FOOTAGE OF INTERIOR LOT LANDSCAPING 1,112 SF. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ALL. OTHER LANDSCAPMCs 30981 SF. ALLOWABLE ISUILPING I-IEIGHT sot-0" PROPOSED WILDING I.1EtGI-T 36'-0" hzEGlJIRED SETSACKS _ 15' ' FRONT 15' a SIDES 15' eREAR ',PROPOSED SETBACKS 85' s FRONT 15' Q SIDES 35' a REAR S/c'd 0EE'ON Wdt :2 L66T'6 'add i • . I CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-034,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT NAME: Union Plaza Shopping Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3904 NE 4th Avenue LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.210.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on May 06, 1997. Written comments and requests for reconsideration shall be forwarded to Development Services Division, Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington, on May 13, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval (SA)., If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as pail of this public hearing. PUBLICATION DATE: April 21, 1997 DATE OF DECISION: April 15, 1997 SIGNATURES: Lib /7/ Gregg Zi ileerm ,Ad ministr�ator DATE De artm�nY of annin /Buildin /Public Works pl 9 9 S 1Chastain, dministrator D Community Service Department c- Lee9'Wheeler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-034,SA,ECF ' APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT NAME: Union Plaza Shopping Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3904 NE 4th Avenue MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $41,857.92. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $142,068.00 (1,894.24 trips x $75 = $142,068.00). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. 3. The Construction Mitigation Plan shall be revised to restrict haul hours to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The revised Construction Mitigation Plan shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of Construction Permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-034,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT NAME Union Plaza Shopping Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3904 NE 4th Avenue Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING 1. Soils report does not contain the analysis for potential for liquefaction as required by the Uniform Building Code, 1994 Edition. Addendum is required. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flows for each building are: Building A-4,500 GPM, Building B- 5,250 GPM, Building C-3,500 GPM, Building D- 3,250 GPM. The primary fire hydrant for each building is required to be within 150 feet of the building. Additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of each building at the rate of one hydrant for each 1,000 GPM of required fire flow or portion thereof. For example, Building B would require 6 hydrants; one within 150 feet and 5 additional hydrants within 300 feet. 2. The fire flow for Building B may not be available in the watermains serving this area. If not, the type of construction can be changed to lower the required fire flow. The preliminary fire flows were calculated on type V N construction. 3. Sprinkler systems are required in Buildings A and B. Building C and D may be required to be sprinklered if they are serving alcohol and have over 5,000 square feet of undivided floor area. Fire alarm systems will be based on the actual use of the building. 4. Separate plans and permits are required by the Fire Department for sprinkler, fire alarm system and hood suppression systems for restaurants. PLAN REVIEW Water Watermain extension, fire hydrants and DDCV assembly's (building, fire control systems will be required and must meet current fire codes/regulations. Water meters for domestic/irrigation will be required sized to meet UPC requirements. Water system development charges (SDC) fees of$0.113 per square foot of gross site area will be required. Transportation Street improvements- NE 4th Street has existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and street lights. New access driveways to the site will be required and they must meet current City Codes/Standards. Sanitary Sewer The Site will require an extension of the sanitary sewer system to reach the proposed buildings within the site. Side sewer connections will be required and the cost is$80 per connection. Sanitary sewer(SDC) fees will be required at$0.078 per square foot of gross site area. Storm Drainage The site will require a storm drainage and temporary erosion control plan with design in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City. Detention/biofiltration will be required via a drainage swale, pond or wet vault. Surface water(SDC)fees will be required at $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface on the site. POLICE The highest number of commercial burglaries and thefts are from construction sites. Police recommend that the applicant fence in the lot with security fencing while the site is under construction, and use security lighting as well. Tools will need to have the model and serial numbers recorded,to aid in recovery if they are stolen. If a construction site trailer is used as an office, it will need heavy duty dead-bolt locks and auxiliary locks, plus metal bars over any windows,to help prevent entry by a thief. The buildings need heavy duty dead-bolt locks on all exterior doors, and security lighting around the building and in the parking lot. An alarm system is also highly recommended. AIRPORT Requires submittal of Notice of Proposed Construction for determination of lighting/marking requirements or determination of hazard or obstacle. Result of FAA review should be reviewed prior to issuance of Building Permit. PLANNING Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works • ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P&Arke., COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/97 i APPLICATION NO: LUA97-034,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 3/20/97 I APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen {WI ECT TITLE: Union Plaza Shopping Center. WORK ORDER NO: 78194 LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 254,698 s.f. (5,85 ac) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 80,496 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. A. I ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information 1 Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts . Necessary Earth Housing Air I Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use • Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposaL S/ /97 Sig ure of Director or Authorized Represen ative Da e DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Transportation Comments Due: 4/3/97 Application No.: LUA 97-034, SA,ECF Date Circulated: 3/20/97 Applicant: Northwest Prompters Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Union Plaza Shopping Center Work Order No: 78194 Location: 3904 NE 4th Street Site Area: 254,698 s.f. (5.85 ac) Building Area(gross): 80,496 s.f. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments B. Policy-Related Comments C. Code-Related Comments Street improvements (NE 4th Street) has existing curbs, gutters, sidewalk, street paving and street lights. New access driveways to the site will be required and they must meet current City Codes/Standards. A study will be required to provide trip generation,AM/PM peak traffic volumes and splits to and from the site. A traffic mitigation fee of$75 per daily trip will be required. rezzaf -/- 77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date grnfldr 2 Li 3 • AlIrAIL _. .� o� rs:27.57"14W45 iy ; uawiu » »� M} ro.y .*we>..w•%w. xrt . E� . O :�• �. .�„» i«�vhl�•.:�rr::1lw.wx� .::ti.n: �µsn ,�:a-,4+ ° Project Name (Atom plaza 5llo'pit" (ci,,-fiV Project Address 3q 0 N E 11611 5Tve t t Contact Person Cuv l Co lso 'i OILp44, iC A ssoc,drs Co . Address 701 D c./ft✓ Tive jV ) 41301 S eat/e 0 8 I O q Phone Number 2 g 5 - 4 3 00 • Permit Number 1- UA - c11 - O 314 I Project Description Re.ful I 5110/19,,, Ge(-IC V — Y hi el)s• �. 3LJ eky 5paces 2'2,2000 )z,kl 25,Q53 Rota , , I — �-'T`' ' ' s.4. , 0-{,ce. - L3 r. f'- } . IRcs7auvumt - J-&t3 s-/. p c vo 6voceycj - 22 t y27 s.f. 'Io7a l - j 4-q-� s.-f. . . I Land Use Type: • Method_of Calculation: ' ❑ Residential TE Trip Generation Manual C�3,'/Retail 0 Traffic Study o Non-retail 0 Other Calculation: S-ez attAciiea S)ieet iZ-e_V1>44 µ 107 i- 1D6 8 . �� I .531 ZJ8. 25 ,1J,eu_) 4jrf/{7 Transportation Mitigation .Fee: , 0- 53 z1 ?.z 5 , 4p Calculated by: if � I Date: ziA47 Account Number: Date of Payment • Transportation Mitigation Fee Calculation Union Plaza Shopping Center Average Daily Net New ITE Code Trips per Primary.Trips Sq.Ft. Average Daily 1,000 sq.ft. (%) Proposed Trips Retail 820 75.62 trips 25% 22,200 sq.ft. 419.69 trips Office .710 23.65 trips , 100% 12,916 sq.ft. 305.46 trips Restaurant 831 81.61 trips 29% 25,953 sq.ft. 614.23 trips Grocery 850 125.48 trips 25% 22,427 sq.ft. 703.53 trips TOTAL 2042.91 trips * Retail figures (average daily trip rate) based on Shopping Center, using curve equation from page 1234 based on total size of center(all uses) * Office trip rates from Table 4,page 942 (using extrapolation). * Restaurant trip rates based on assumption as Quality Restaurant (page 1249 -by equation), which is lowest trip generator for restaurant designations. * Grocery trip rates based on estimated value for weekday daily trips, based on ratios established between peak rates and daily rates on weekends. Manual only lists peak hour values for weekdays. Same trip generation values used for Safeway store on NE 4th St. * Assumptions for primary trips for various uses (thereby discounting pass-by and diverted trips), are based on values used for Safeway project, derived from information provided in the ITE Manual. Based on mitigation fee of$75 per net new average daily trip: ($75)X (2042.91 daily trips)= $153,218.25 UNPLZ-2.DOC\ (VY O CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: March 21, 1997 TO: Peter Rosen, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal `! SUBJECT: Union Plaza Shopping Center, 3904 NE 4th St. Fire Department Comments: 1.The preliminary fire,flows for each building are ; Building A- 4500 GPM, Building B- 5250 GPM, Building C- 3500 GPM, Building D- 3250 GPM. The primary fire hydrant.for each building is required to be within 150 feet of the building. Additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of each building at the rate of one hydrant for each 1000 GPM of required fire flow or portion thereof. Example, Building B would require 6 hydrants, one within 150 and 5 additional hydrants within 300 feet. 2. The fire flow for Building B may not be available in the watermains serving this area. If not, the type of construction can be changed to lower the required fire flow. The preliminary fire flows were calculated on type V N construction. 3. Sprinkler systems are required in building A and B. Buildings.0 and D may be required the be sprinkled if they are serving alcohol and have over 5,000 square feet of undivided floor area. Fire alarm systems will be based on the actual use of the buildings. 4. Separate plans and permits are required by the Fire Department for sprinkler, fire alarm system and hood suppression systems for the restaurants. 5. The required fire mitigation fees based on $.52 a square foot are: Building A- $18,922.22 Building B- $15,854.80 Building C- $3,961.88 Building D- $4,707.56 Please feel free to contact this office if you have any questions • ! - i City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Plan Review-Water Comments Due: 4/3/97 Application No.: LUA 97-034, SA,ECF Date Circulated: 3/20/97 Applicant: Northwest Prompters Project Manager: Peter.Rosen Project Title: Union Plaza Shopping Center Work Order No: 78194 Location: 3904 NE 4th Street Site Area: 254,698 s.f. (5.85 ac) Building Area(gross): 80,496 s.f. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments B. Policy-Related Comments • C. Code-Related Comments Water Main extension, fire hydrants and DDCV assembly's (building fire control systems will be required and must meet current fire codes/regulations. Water meters for domestic/irrigation will be required sized to meet UPC requirements. Water system development charges (SDC)fees of$0.113 per square foot of gross site area will be required. Signature of Director or Au orized Representative Date gmflcir City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW°SHEET Reviewing Department: Surface Waste Water Comments Due: 4/3/97 Application No.: LUA 97-034, SA,ECF Date Circulated: 3/20/97 Applicant: Northwest Prompters Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Union Plaza Shopping Center Work Order No: 78194 Location: 3904 NE 4th Street Site Area: 254,698 s.f. (5.85 ac) Building Area(gross): 80,496 s.f. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments B. Policy-Related Comments C. Code-Related Comments The Site will require an extension of the sanitary sewer system to reach the proposed buildings within the site. Side sewer connections will be required and the cost is $80 per connection. Sanitary sewer (SDC) fees will be required at $0.078 per square foot of gross site area. The site will require a storm drainage and temporary erosion control plan with design in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City. Detention/biofiltration will be required via a drainage swale, pond or wet vault. Surface water (SDC) fees will be required at $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface on the site. rez " �J -resentative Datei - 77 h rized Re Signature of Director orA uto p grnfldr City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works • ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: V;001t COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/97. APPLICATION NO: LUA97-034,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 3/20/97 APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen i3JECT TITLE: Union Plaza Shopping Center WORK ORDER NO: 78194 • LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 254,698 s.f. (5,85 ac) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 80,496 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS ilY Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air i Aesthetics _ Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 'L{1- (,P? I POI l Le CIAS e 5 MC (A (t n n LLcL l Li l)CL d 011 G 1L C) This area of Renton reports a high number of commercial burglary, robberies and thefts from vehicle types of reports. To help prevent these kinds of crimes , the businesses will all need solid-core exterior doors. Back doors will need peeop-holes for employee safety, to aid in the observation of the back alley-ways. Security lighting will need to be in place around the exteriors of all the buildings , especially in the back sides. Access to the hack of the B. ;POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • buildings should be limited- preferably with security fencing. After the businesses have closedithis area could become dangerous due to the lack of natural surveillance by business merchants. This area of Renton also reports a high n'umber.of drug-related activity incidents , such as drug sales in parking lots. Recommend that the landscaping that covers the exterior property line of the property be thinned out and replaced with chain-link fencing instead Or in addition to the landscaping. Because of the lack of visibility around and behind the . businesses , criminals could be tempted to congregate in these areas for drug related crimes or to attempt to break into the businsses via the back doors. By eliminated the excess land- C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS scaping and providing chain-link fencing, visibility will be greatly improved - thus allowing other merchants or customers to keep an eye on the property. Each. back door to each business will need auxiliary locking devices in addition to heavy-duty dead-bolt locks (such as a latch guard and pry-resistant cylinder around the lock) . Each business needs a security alarm system. Security lighting will need to be maintained in the parking areas , as well as surrounding each. building. We.halve reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1 i fit&Le c23 — 9-7 Si n�tLre of irector o Aut prized Representative Date 9 DEVAPP.DOC City o,Renton Department of Planning/Building/Pt,...,o Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ��{— REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �tttf'pOYI COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-034,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 3/20/97 APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen qaalECT TITLE: Union Plaza Shopping Center WORK ORDER NO: 78194 LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 254,698 s.f. (5,85 ac) BUILDING AREA(gross): 80,496 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth I ✓ Housing ✓ Air I ✓ Aesthetics ✓ Water I ✓ LighVGlare ✓ Plants I ✓ Recreation ✓ Land/Shoreline Use ✓ Utilities V Animals 1/ Transportation ✓ Environmental Health ✓ Public Services ✓ Energy'/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment ✓ 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ✓ 62Uti,D LEVEL AT 5 t T E tZ 4sa' /ESL ( A€ci€. SBA LtiIeL'). EA tic EIL.Ix.. v.raseD 271 r A5L CON WAL. 5O111AI:li. Sat/KOOK "o2P_Ou RDAC. • t B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS L' 5U$�, peP RT T1‘Bu5-1.1E5 UM? 4s.s KPATc$t- WIN oPSP_AT91,4 As,tecee. ANcJce,s5ikits, I6� cL•ttat6 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS �N�TOucil�M 'FOE 't�Ei P MANill del 1Z' C!LQB3 30244LlTAL- Oar Ptv+IOC PP,.aPV € pc- ILt.cb.Ttf,�E�� trtAiLetHc �a4.T5 0$DP�Ut�U�� Rt.o� `�D ��uAt1c� �7 81.E RasIpI t..T of- ` A-A .P.oUt£u�) 3t'Du t.P 3 F��R• We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where =••itional informa •'is needed to properly assess this proposal. 0 7 • 11 tUrla-PA- 2-4 Signatu f Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP•• Rev.10/93 . City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works • ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Covdnichow SiCLz COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-034,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 3/20/97 r%ITY OF RENTotN I APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen q JECT TITLE: Union Plaza Shopping Center WORK ORDER NO: 78194 MAR 2 i) 1997 LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street ,ll SITE AREA: 254,698 s.f. (5,85 ac) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 80,496 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information i Impacts Impacts Ne;e77 Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth 1 Housing. Air I Aesthetics Water _ Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/ShorelineUse _ Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet I • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 501L, R 0 b uT oba 10 ,7... N ( '\ 1 114, [‘til) R(/‘-(515 ED it . PbT/E1611 at k)k IA g Pfi- TO - cits ,i)N �D IRO P1 TUB 13k)tkidlit i41L,L' 1fr • l . • qq Ltffll(olD , RI) 01 o OK. 15 R , PDI .• cux)GAIXIMEYAMMOMUSXXI B. Soils report does not contain the analysis for peotential for liquefaction as required by the Uniform Building Code, 1994 Editon, Addendum is required. • C. CODE RELATED COMMENTS: NONE. We hav: = e• 4i: applic-t. with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where :•• , 1 i I.j: .o /d-dtoproperfyassessthisproposaL 1 0 1 / ( 2.214 2 Signature• 9 irector or Auth• ed Representative Date DEVAPP.D. Rev.10/93 ARCHOEC111NErA all_ ENGINEERING iNE PLANNING% __QR 8 ith PL WVPLANNING � �.2Si�Q '�'� I 701 DIXffR AVE.N. T re �\\ '��'• aZ=ME6 ! 6thPL, sE1 DE WA.VE.N.i W__ _ (206)285-4300 ....1 NE 6th PLACE M! Q Q - OLYMPIC Z9 R-8 ASSOCIATES R-8 COMPANY R-8 R-8 H R-10 NE 6th STREET R-8 UNION PLAZA 1 3 8 R-10 R-24 SHOPPING r CENTER I I Go & OFF( 1RM-I R-10 NE 5th STREET R-10 1J1 z 1 IRM-C .\ ' , RM-c \SIT1= Z CS — \cs O cs k 1 NE 4th STREET SITE VICINITY Cs MAP R-8 Cs I NE 3rd PLACE Cs P-1 1 R-I0 VICINITY MAP FOR UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER - - 96016.01 0 100' 400' *n*�iJUIJ a r� • • ' KETST�p�•A�Eq RETAMNG ,,-IIESIERT!RED CEDAR I I It-FRASER FWOTINIA WALL 1 CIVILI ]-OESTEAN IUD CEDAR i__......_..._.__..__._.._j I I ° 1II o SEE ' 1 •' l-DQY L45 FIR I 1 LEE SPECIFICATIONS ii.rr � _ . _ .:�:__, ..:,...t.,..:._.... ,,.....,� „_-„-..•, „ . �.. 'fR 4: gip. r; „ � •O.TAD r�W.F I/ FII• SF F,My 1.3-•3.DC. CK �__ A,.\�, i i T O,.��♦1 v u..w• ,...u.�.,.. «,.r..+..u..,. I o J t 3'DG a.::.Q.....:Y..SER FbJ TNIA VGA Yam!:�� a R-MIN,FIRE' ]5-:BASER PHOTMI �O��f REDTT�L ..' PERIS•3'O'OL. •5 OD, �O(,I. \ .... 0 .>0'�� / '\ 11 IHEATME hR oz. 8-DWARF SKRMIA I I nf.� / ` .r-+«.w••... =.* w+.n==',.r«_ 11' I f ',�I i! i! C IWILDmG� J b'u1dN4N KRIxRHODODENDLa Y% �n�]3 O •3y'OL. ; /} . _�__......w.._..r^--..M..-'� �'1 'J.�fI _ _4 -__ ___?t-�=?t�_�iY=-_ • I f ••"-�tl•Lw N, 1]•wT BERM MC • �U%/. ,n'•••�J��4` v CIVIL/ I _~......,. RN...°.a........._= ps. a ° 11 i 1 a5-'SFRTNGLOGD PEAL• W-1CU1ANZdN' lb-'ANTHOJT WATERER' FEATHER•]1y'OG 3-DOUCLAS . _ w .�•n°'-',�l Y•"`�'1-�+•w��l�••• • SEE I • I ' CHERRY SPIRE&•3.D.C. • FIR I •_ LAM r ,l IIIPR-'ANd4 KFSD rZEN .•r. .r«,`._ 411.. i I, I NrO♦ IUODODENDRON lir y I I I/ .I�_. it R NT BEI@I .r R'IR.DERM • ? MC •3'OL 1 a_.. ,.l....._ter-..-n.1..aw•.wj.rw...__.. i It p `E bL. CO I � :I{I� ` I ':�' I I �`.-'�• I ,•/i� 1 RED CE'DAR �..,+ `�._ .......-.—....�.....� I i / F1.�,1 108••uELLERI'COILS R-'CLEVELAND SELECT. 'WILDS.IB•I e z Z j 1 1 II •J'OC. RQIERMG FEAR •3'OC MOLLY 110 t .....«.` .. ..._.-,.r+,n.a s_w..gym, I I 'Y 1 I "� •04 I / w 5 FIR OY,L45 ( " " _ _ -.._ Z< z I I / o4 f I 1, �i 10-'MIdN KRIISCHKE• qy/� v r..r., rr...r -w O F. l I I ! 1 :11 i'•�1� I I ` I]•NT.BEY;R RNODODENDRW �', ' ��.�_ ..a. ..w..w..«u_.._+, N II GERM ;`'I' �E. 11. Pa{A ; .-WESTERN ,p/7 . �,.__+..._ 3 �' Q I �?-•:� , RED CEDAR II I I �5�p`� ( I Imo'/ '�� • , - {/, �......w«..... ^ j 11 (, II0' I RETAIL I ;y t ram._...w.w......w Z CL Z • ,mod 1\ 5.•'MELLERI'MOLLY A}•dNTHCNT WATERER' 36-'uELLERI'MOLLY _ • a-a LJ \ ,I •3.OC. SPIRE&••3.O.G. ••3.OL. ' ]]-STELLA D'ORO' aQvq K • •� I I I I Sys R•HT.DEMI �' I R• _ 2•HT eE —� i H ,r• --R• uec, •r3 _ I_ + ��1 ;" „stir , 1 Ta 't- Y -t4�- � ,r.: -h.� ► l cl a 1a !/ 1 t-F RI• c j I , - Q I i=�� (�� I I 'I i I 11'� - IR/r,,,FRY }-•TRUOE WEeSTER Iay�. 'I'I .oma_•, 226.'SPRING400D PINK' R-'&VAN KRISCNKE• V1nwuiyy' 1BER� (SEE CIVIL) RMODO ENDRON OO?�-. 1 1 - I I' PINK.HEATHER .S-SPRINvWOOD PING' RHODODENDRON 'CHERRY G1nC .`".� az' ± I� I•• .Fri • I WV OC WEATHER•],y'O.C. •E'Y'O. :gill � o ewe.,._ L I I �. I I DeasYA i v�I�' A51 �i I ' ! -4•11, P R•MT eBSlI Mc TOP CF , I., r l WEEPING 4L4SKA _ wn,m,w �� .I I ,1 `I. ry,�{ ___ ___ _ ___ ___ ___ d ___ ___ _—I �_�� {n!0•• - CEDAR �/ www �,vy u _ ,, A17 �� '• B�'�TTO • it I.-. $' ,-- b-SPRNGIOOD PINK. ___ 3-GREEN ,IF: MI. 2 1 PEROO• R04 Is - UTKEN i� I 35-`SPRIn1GUIOD PAK' ].-MMF�F PIERIS�: HEATHER•]h'O. M E,ENEE 1 i�� •.a.. L4UFEL HEATHER•]y'O. • f •.'OL f 1 J.,� TnT-BALdL 1�<�: I.-K0NIKAWICK TREE PLANTE.AIM OTAICNO BETA/ ' I I WILDING 9i ]B-DWARF EKR4'11A I WILDING ICI' 30-54LAL 3'OG �•'•. •3'OL. NM yy /I .I 1 •3'OL. • \G� ] RGJ II ] T 65-FRASER PHOtIN14 b-SPREADING ENGL SN SEED �I► DOY Ld9 FIR b'HT. :=i\._ BERMS ./Y1 •5'O.C. 'E[([E[ YEW•3,1'OG w('\ • C i BEAM FI: 1 �i, �.�IA��Ai.>=• N' `5-WESTER RED '+'' 3�.s r-i.w W I. ] �il "' .47, .. 4w4wAN.ww.•www..w•r.. �M .... ._...,t.. ... .1 ?..� w ,Z,Il fit. 9nw..'^ j'E. �.AV' ! ]]-'TRIDE ABETTER• B3-.RdIIKAWICK m" � •-•• aM N E� . L I ]-UESTEI@!RED , RHODODENDROV Y O. _wa' m Sao 16-•3.O CEDAR \ •3'1'OL. Aric, 3'OC. ROCKERY,SEE CIVIL) �•• PLANT MATERIAL LIST I• ..ul o f 1 n•a.._ —weu .e s I OTT.I BOTANICAL NAME I CQTION NAME I 912E.SPACING • w 1mu v.. W 15 i �� -w q n ram• 3 ACER PALMAT1f1 GREEN J4PANESD MAPLE ]'C4L.MJ'MTV.545 BIB z •� r a.m mN 0 ACER RUBRfT SLUT SUNSET. RED SUNSET'RED MAPLE ]•CAL,R•-H'NT.BN •30'DC. EINR- PLANTING OCTAL < '.•E'• ,.•�,� ,_mw.e w 1 OIN'JECTPAFSII00MAie83F503.4 IIEEPNG ALAS•C&CEDAR 1'•8'H.10.G LAWN EMI ORAL •' NTS NORTH J Q a EN a :�••a•.w yl n PR..SERRn.ATA KWANZAR X 1.0612 N•FLOWERING CHERRY ]•CAL-..42.uT 545 eR•.'S' W.a" ""l"""' Isy"'y;' E 11 PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIEs11 D OSLUI FIR r-8'MT.B•B s xy U cr ..-e F 23 TN414CPLICATd'f1EvELbO SELECT'WE9 ELRN RED CEDAIN.ruFro PEAR ]-E N RILLMT. e e e,eR..h• 30�IS' 0 30' 60' L I �y O m Ei[ n ' - - np ]SO ARCTOSidPHTLOS Uv4-URSI KRNIKINNIGK /GAL 0041.I 3'DC. PLANT MATERIAL LIST SCALE: 1" = 30' '�- W�_ ?!i w.•..1.m. ra a..ru wiv U 653 ERCA[AREA 5FRIN4.41000 PNC•'SPREKCOOD PM .HE4TUER I GAL.COLT.•WV OL. _I OTT.I DOTANIC4 NdME I CLYMW NAME I 912E•SPACING I U "9 '�I� pO 115. GAULTHERd SUU LLON SALAL I GAL.CONT.•3'OC. an� 18 MINIS LAIWCERWIIS VITO LUTFEN.'OTTO LAUREL'LAUREL ]I'-]a•ui-B•B•.'OL 111r u•_...ee_•_w a 0 213 LEE CKENAT4'HELLER!'A ORO'WELLER.ROLLYDAYLILY 2 GAL COB.Sr OC. m 34 RHCDODE`ORON•TROE WEBSIER''TRICE RHODODENDRON 21=].4T BIB•3'ry'OC. �',+1 r�\ XUY uC Q sheet Y 46 ANIFERG SABNA DRJAOTIO R BROADTTCOt JUNIPER 5 GAL.CONT.•6'0C. 16 36 SK11•EIIA REEVESIAN4 DWARF SKIro114 5 GAL.CANT.•]'OL. >• �t. U.RSF•In z L—1 PANOle CLANG RANIER OCTAL bS PMOTINIA FRASER, FRASER PMOTRA 3 GAL.CONT.•5'O.C. 0i ]]8 SPRAEA F'WILDA.0450,!T BUFFER'ANTHCNY WATERER'SPIRE&]GAL COB.•3'OC ' , Mk,S.Om10en Q Ria i 36 PIER*JAPONICA MTN FIRE' TIM FIRE'PIERIS ]I•-].•HT,BIB•3'O'OO. 18 TAXIS DACCATA REP4NDENS SPREADING ENGLISH YEW B•-b•SPR•3'2'OG • • .1.>""'',�� _�, -L ARCHNECNRE ��.v L ENGINEERING par?" eft //�II�B( aril— �4�sw �� ...•_ -F1,1 I PLANNING PLACE a TIE SITE MUMS DEYELCPI•ENrX ID WOODED bN„" ""1'• .. 19 8 R-8 701 DEXTE MANAGEMENT VE.. AND CCIRANS A MIME C ALDER DO. 0 FIR R-'"" "dli I I .— R-10 I 5EAl1lF.WA.98109 i i 1 4 , ...,,,., , AN)IEFLOCK DIE TO EXIEN5IVE SITEW'7TdC (206)285-4300 D•-e•WIDE' TIE EXISTING TREED WLL OE R1910.ED.REFER I I I I ' , NE am STREET 11 -VU 0 L Y M P I C. LANCSCAPSG - TO TXE XEW LMDSCAPPG PLAN FCR PFORIATKN 1D�E I�Ep DOTER AND LOCATION CF NEW TREE AND RAM I Y R-24 FIRi 6FOWIATIR!p!EJtIDT �''S• 7>'.Y T''F• _ )T-ro•r___� MATERIALS.REFER TO CIVIL FLAN FOR NEW - 8 R-IO ASSOCIATES /�,/ e•sorue »e.f fFADPG AND CGNTOW"`°Ial°"ai COMPANY• NEW CQ7101P5 AND fETAMMG WALLS 6' ��///��j//�////////�////��///�� T r� * � t 7' .1 , �■n,� NE Slh SWEET C� 'aE WaY 7e•WIDE DIOVE AISLE - g R-10 r-.•_ }% ,/ ., /\. /,//• .a 9 EXI9TMG F1��W CRITOOR9.11TILITIEB �_ ..'',,,,%A%�%` %j I Spea,EFER TO CML DRAWIIGS \� UNION PLAZA i,"j,• �//fi:.•,A%/j ;A FOR FFCIONATEN CN EXISTS*dD RM-G /�J% /j a NEW EAL,MS ND CIVIL R WS:GS Rtl-C =1 T _I SHOPPING jj-4 j%/j� ' (TYPICAL).REFER TO CIVIL DRNUPG9 /:.i.:i:- Iq� r E FCR LOCATEPIS CF ALL EXISTING AND y r—J j.. LAN::. . 3 LATDSCAPP*/j /��%i%i�%�%/ " r�IMt\ I E 8L OFFI ^ :r / rr r/ f ` l -///�" F — _ 3904 NE 4th STREET M1 I I ( ,K I �F` i�cyr_a�y�g �•71. $ R 8cs RENTON, WA : I T •M•I)PlI Z R - 3E ACE !°\\ 5-°•WIDE CS P •'\1 \;\ ( LAVDSCAPP* ' NS\\\\ •\y�S>.'' r 4 e.FER :Zsj,: 0 =:::. mme wit NA a �v \ .Verge•.. I a\ $; 2 VICINITY MAP o!�' ' \'\\\\\ nW \\ ' — \ SCALE r=zoo'-o �I' eoo' • O \ I % • CITY Q RB7TR17ar1P*aMSFILLTIO7 CX \e M1 \ \ TOTAL SAW@ FOOTAGE OF THE arm 7SAbee SF. \ / \ 6% .T-_ 68.R, 6].'1'.r-< 3 3 r, \ r TmALDOIIy�FOOTKEaT1lARDM30. SITE PLAN • 1\ DNLDSG'a• NM7 SP. \ MUM.RETAIL TA SA>SF. \ e \ .tom\. WLDSCa'A- Pile)SF. 3 \ \\\F.I6' STNIGWF M.X� \ \ NESTALFi NT 1 D SF. \ �. a \ \ IffSTAIRA17i TOTAL lW SF. \�� r\ WRONG S 7A 1 DP. \ , PRFCT TOTAL SO SN S f. OIMMI BUILDING"A" - ' it I I 111. � imT I'yl TOTAL SOI.VCE FOOTAGE CP DLL&FoemertS, bDSJ SP. 1,1 "/ PERCENTAGE a LOT COVERAGE. 7AN 2nd FLOOR : , .. ..�,7 III WI,Y' -0 PAO**ROLM. 6 - m. a.� S CApg •° e• 6 CA 0 FAL SIM SPACES P1VrOEO Tin ��- S' . .+. SCAISS.S17e' D'•6-*NI •• '' r COPAL"512E SPACES PROYDED n e'-e•WIDE .. ii`tat'O 2 : ` "�, 03-6••G30-2 °wEaosRelrF*"�://j�/ /�a/// G%�`&%G GG /j�//�/O/�% �i%%/{�"i/"'., r Wa NANDICAP Aa�-S�o°arAeD SPACESsveLE l _'�, „ :/%%/�•< //'/�/:/ (PER SPACE TOTAL Ja OIX 'FOOTAGE OF POMOR LOT LNOSCARY Ala SP. EXISITPGaIXISTSG t1.131LLE _ • _ _-�. _ply S•SEWER LSE MARE FOOTAGE CP ALL CANER LAIOSCAR* NNW SF. 5E1LER LSE EXISTS*STCFEI SYSTEM NE.4TH AVE. a SIi WDw IEiw•LRr 5N-e• . NE D b•SELLER LINE \- EXOST0G 0•WATER LPE PRCPL'+SED 5ULDP*NEWT %'-e• FEW 5•-0'ODE SIDEWALK REGROW PETRA** D••RENT e••ODES XE915'-°•PL/WTPG STRIP D••REAR ^'T n•''.-.� 96016.01 PROPOSED SEIeAOCe D••OWESREAR �� 1 SITE PLAN »•ENE A CL 0 SCAIE I'=40.-0' ,_' 3 PROJECT DATA b INA 3/14/97 09:35 on • ,,,,, ,. 00 0 •O. 0 •O ° ° >r� L' @ 'i -®- .L.. -.,.'ri - - - - ARCHITECTURE _ _ _ _ _ _ rr IMIABLENT A A M � i�l� re ENGINEERING r / /I • I I / \ \ • •• \ \ \ \ \\ \ � PLANNING + p iga Tot DEXTER AVE.N. — SEATTLE,WA.98109 IQ t (206)285-4300 1 if ' WINS lig W OLYMP IC ASSOCIATES COMPANY 1 .„ e—T-- . , • - • - • -I . -1 . -I . —" _ =-TJ 1-77 0—t-7,--1- I __ ___ ___ ` �` UNION PLAZA LI• ® o • o o • -- GDA` 00 00 ® 00 ® -- J 0 SHOPPING -, CENTER & OFFIr,• 1 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN SCALE I/18" = 1.-0" • 3904 NE 4th STREET RENTON, WA • ,..00 0 • 0 .O Di OO 0 .L. .p 0 0 ,g ,L, .,r,...:. . W.. v4 00. as re tr.. re me me ao ae ao ao ai NUM rs• 'Emir �® s\ WV. ip -mum R. '�. 1 1 1 1 . I 1 1 1 1 ,I' ES i\� 1 ,r`` 1 ;F` • 1 1- 1 �` r ,,I`. 1 ;,1 =I;,II 11;;lii Ill1;1111111IHM;'I1111111II1111111:.:1111n11111111IM`;I11111111111111111-1111iSl I!!I21;91CR111111111°i- --- 'IRllllt:llfll"IMII81U11113III-11151lnllllll'9IIII,",INI0IIICI-1111111n111111"I°'•IIIIIICIII1111111 11111111111111.-- . 0 0 ® 0 ® ® Oaf A 00 00 0 •1 L• I BUILDING 'A' FLOOR PLANS 2 LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN • ROOF PLANS SCALE I/16" = I.-0•• 7 . / l' / y I 1:11-"C•7.2."11 11 I I 1 1 I I 1` '` `� L1 1 r 1 I L� J I L��c:m.,' I I L� ��y 1 I MCII i 1 !I1 ;1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r +'s 1216, ^.`• v'�® 1 I j 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 J 1 I I 1 r • ROOF PLAN - -AI] 3 SCALE I/16" = - ^• "'..I. "p1O T (� �S SARCHffECNRE 1 1 - Q Q m+, �__ _ ® � © OENGINEERING�• A _ I _ _ L L 1 J © ® NATVGENENT 701 DEIOER AVE N. SEATTLE.WA 96109�� I. �'' I I I I \ ' (206)285-4300 • OLYMPIC 167A6.1.068.6s606 \ / I ASSOCIATES AI -M a I I I I V COMPANY I \IL . UNION PLAZA �:.QI '1' SHOPPING • 11 I I I :..�, = Ilittr- CENTER & 0 - I ---_ -- --- --` — — ��—© — —© OFFICES I I I I IMIALLCAeEuea ; 3904 NE 4th T RENTOri, WA II I I I I • V __________I ,ti I � u �'. II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I - --1—1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 I II O 1 0 — =_-- =— f— — = '_ _ :. O t — ='tom}u u 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I . 1 = i 1 VU V V '".. / / / i 0 I ©O 21 I. ID ,11 11/1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN — BUILDING "B' 2 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN — BUILDING ''B'' SCALE I/18" = l•-0" SCALE 1/16" = 1•-0" T Y T 7 0 o ,� O.1 :' � � f L� �, BUILDING 'B'I I I I CO N,WPM ( o ..".., MIMIA M) 1 .,.,.,am n FLOOR PLANS n ROOF PLAN 1 I 1 o - il __ —r- _+---_F- - ---�- --r,--0 1 n G 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 0774mWIW0.•W7Z I I I I 1y ----TT}_ TT____TTTi T TT=TrT--=--aTteT=='=Ttf�T==`=TtTf J �- ma�0 Pa I R 1 mGH T l i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I " s��"��_ 0 Q `4 1 I II I 1. I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 m 3 ROOF PLAN — BUILDING "B" SCALE 1/16"= 1.-0" 0/12097 • ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERINGr PLANNING MANAGEMENT 701 DEXTER AVE N. CC O O O O Cif O O O O O ® suTne W.eatos NOWI fI0 NI1 i A (206)285-4300 AIM I OLYMPIC ASSOCIATES A OM INALGIEVO MOW 3 E ..d...a.../VT r 3 m UNION PLAZA SHOPPING r Idd rxt d v °___ I t — CENTER & „ _ , L.,- T. OFFICES �• o 0 0 o o oi &Li o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ® 4 i BUILDING "C" BUILDING "D" 9004 NRE TONR WA 1 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN SCALE t/t6" = 1'-0" BUILDING 'C' & 'D' FLOOR PLANS • •C 0 P T R I 6 H T• .. 31Z ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PIANNPIG r .41 ill MANAGEMENT A ,01 DEXTER AVE N. IIIIIIII IIIIIIIII�" "�111111 IIII IIIIIII IIIIIIIIII 'LAME.206)285-4300 •'1LIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIGF....FGII II IIII IIIIIIII IIII IIIIIII"" "III IIIIu1FP'- "111 r .P1111111IIIIIIIIIIInIII1FPIIIIIII,,,,,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILIP.IIIIII,,,,,,IIIIlIIIIIIIIIIIIF!IIIIIIII,,,,IIIIIIIII� llllll,,,,lll11:1 l,,,11111illll'lllllllll!IIIIIIIIII,,,,lllllllllllllllllli.11lll-.,,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIG,.. OLYMPIC + � __ _- j ASSOCIATES S _.. - I • i,. d f'KI 7 <n'_ •-C f- 1__ 7_I I'�-�T--G?1-o/., _Ilnlminict. -n'7 =I I �iTll:=I ■:I Ff.7:.P31-:■ ■"mn.■ v--rr1 COMPANY ` _� I!'_-`11� '!11-=.�11�__-��i�=!11�= _! I=..==- =====11---..= === -__ ---= ate per • UNION PLAZA BUILDING "A" FRONT ELEVATION SHOPPING SCALE 1/16' = 1'-0' . CENTER & OFFIr Q Y 3904 NE 4th 8'__ _' . •`...illll�lll111111111111 11 1111IIIIIIIIIIII I'PAIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIlNW-"- � 1= ` RENTON. WA B =III= =1a1= ti _ - __ - mi_ a=i r41;-�-__;'_frr-=' '=_err;=_ . a =- _ _,_'all -_I_BIM�A■I■Z■� 1�■■■■■■�� 1�■■■■■■1� ==(IV=: .,'1 —181=_ a .ALL rE1OWKRtEaIPTENT ILL . _- - - -_— ---�� ,I � s.iii.i iiiii�i i�iil�ii '�'i� _i�- l� I�G tee FGINTED N ROOFTOP RECESSED 1r1- P _ i•i i. �� _ AREAS AT REAR SIDE OF ROOF di ALL dIODNGS( ,,', 2 BUILDING "B" FRONT ELEVATION •��,, '' SCALE 1/18' = -0' CFFlCE LEASE SPACE IIIIMIMINIMIIIMEIN '..nLIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII a':II%ailil�IllllllllllllllllllllIIIIIIllh❑... nIIIIIIIIIIII_ I_ IIIIIIIIIIII.._II '�i�'faIIII.�IIIIIIIIIII________IIIIIIIInIIIIDP. ':Fa,r,.a�__[T is "Yl ^..1==—Fn-i ■ —u 7 .., .I o1 •ME AST^ a. ©: �i: VA , w .14 II■I� i� r�li =ii_ %I■ -jI■ ,t y _■[j=::=.I n _ii -@% I. si= __i i=:==I I_ _ j BUILDING BUILDING "C" BUILDING "DI, ELEVATIONS SCHEMATIC BUILDING SECTION 3 BUILDING "C" & "D" FRONT ELEVATION 4 SHOWING HVAC EQUIP. LOCATION SCALE 1/18' = 1'-0" SCALE 1/B' = 1'-0' • PR FINISIED PETAL R7CFFG A.-.....,...... COLOR TO BE OREEN OR `\ TERE PETAL GRAY \ ND?FEWC OFS• PANTED E SKN ENO AT MR PREMISEDPRIG CLEAR RLSIATED COON TO BE GREEN CR FFEFNSHED PETAL ROM* CLAIM SYSTEM TEFSE PETAL GNAT . CCLCR TO BE O EN CR PANTED EMS.ARCH ini—Ia P om .® IERE PETAL GRAY FOOD ACTENTER FS3NISIFD PETAL FASCIA. FACE CM(LITERS AM SCENT F'I�NA9IFD P£Tµ FASCIA —UNION PU2A— s O]/12/9P ....VS]P. G\coG._ WIW-fLAZAUJ-P GLIDERS AND SOFIT ■EN■M■■■N\�N■ PANTED E=FREZE BOARD • 1 , .. .. _. .. . - PANTED O X0 FRIEZE EOAFO �._.� CLEAR EGLATED GLADNG SYSTEM �_ N'---I� a0 •'9 PANTED UFO.SCA ENO 1� ull 11= n • • EFLIT FACE CPU - TURECRAFT JO'S CARDS I C. PANTED EIFn SIGN ew0 _j -.—.- r>�� AAA IIIIIl _- I IIII iIIuI111 DM ertlFly. E.1 DELI �— FREFNNIED PETAL AONNG OYERV NGi RECESSED METAL DWtlFCUT—�.. i•_. - _ / , SPLIT FACE CPU - F�■F■� •�• •• 9 s•C 0�.�Ps�®I . T• RECESSED PETAL DOINL°PWD ,•--- CLEAR NEILADED GLAZNG STS7@T ..,E=I!I I II I - - •o_ CLEAR MSLLdTED GLAD.*STSIEM - SPLIT FACE O11 EETOO �T I �2f •� •q nu./.r L!i1= jISAI SPLIT FACE CM - I SPLIT FACE QU S;�=0111�D - - , \ ® F� 5 TYPICAL BUILDING MATERIALS MATERIAL DESIGNATIONS ARE SHOWN ON PORTIONS OF BUILDING 'A' AND 'B'. b (/�� BUILDING 'C' & 'D' USE THE SAME METAL ROOFING SYSTEM. SPLIT FACE EMU, AND SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0' CLEAR WINDOW GLAZING SYSTEM AS SHOWN IN BUILDING 'A' AND "B". • • PRELIMINARY WATER PLAN ' _ _ n _ WAT9i DATA r.40' � 1 ! mr0,•K[ 1b M• �r .� ®y ^^ o;-rmss X il�%%//.,'�//.:/�//.,+7�%!f/r-"f;!1/G///////.;..� x p,-r>a can o x - I - o • l�%? same �.:_ COMM..�„,� .. o :• :Irk .. 1 0JSIPili `s,� g eps ra.oR ■spa ■: q� • iil!iiiili„ri�Rl I `�°,"" .., ;: r ; _ ©I_r w olwa sou R TO OE MO COMMON OF - . I xl f. : WISMSnOK VV 0 1• .. � a a Da Al r a *;^ _ =. eam 1c p i b i r.p )., ( ) _ _ ®_e ms �J YIa .V e,PR 0. s 65 ..r .,I,`_ ; Ix = Y` x PP '; -I •ssnar 1' 1 : {' xl - v,l q ' m V D PR.541H. ■6 f. `� e 1 r 12 .i7 _ 1.r _ 0 1_r CROSS '11 •�Y+�..� i— �/ _ 7_ BLDD D. ;^3 J1 y ,-r rt[ ,1' O . -� �."C�� _ 1 • ®,_ME MOM ASmar x ¢ S l'r Ill / 3 ITC CM MLR PI MANG = mvr o f1•`■ ^�-s� •1%7M L LtILimwas ....."' an 1 1 6 y .. JJ .. . am' ..� .. 3� o,m•- _. Y� ' wat. myATjNW'tT r _ _ 1r n 4 ,. ---- - - ---;mil. _ •'•,,�._,eai..lE4 81T T_ - - — — - - g�N'''' a :,. , ., .._......, ... .,�-.e.. -._.. -ILA l'Q. :e' • I 1 cs o/e/oe I AO r.604,1 eoaR 03/12/1297.Ue]) Sc.1_0 M wrlvn unr 1e0,62-S1Ie041-e1, PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER PLAN 1-5'�_ .s� rr,.,r. SEWER DATA, ,t` V• ,.lE�kn xo �1 O. • T-40' - smolw[ vaev ♦` �_viai�o"Sn "uriuie Y •went.u.n:.r ��• . j• w-tlxv �p.eat.cm 4v cl�) Rom•... S: 1.348 m(va�wl ' •1. B OOM .. FF:399A0 ' , 4' • `!.ox v d aa00iuif i-.w6 r. or o®r E�,..;IQIK -- .y;,. .... p.. k, - °[.;�nabn p A 10 mart tour.'Are " Sd0Ot1KE IOOOS • . r yore.OM PROW TO 0 [001[xot. . 61 k. ) :7..::::7, '.7..';;*.23;1'7:: . ';"47).- c\ ;',..:,.. - : ',/=-7-1 ., - '. • ' MM.' ,..-. . RIP , c.) $ i 8 CO a - T : fl 3 • / gg _ m FR 00 .1•,• ,( )� BLDG'C i': . -, -,7 ; -• ---.---cc4-m. i ,c, :=- -\1;, .' . ,, \ --__T. .• it _ r(.i )� 4y ) FF_404.00 x-- .....e �_�. --- Iy/r.- -k —1.i 1 - - 17��{i7, w 4I1 C^+74 Y• �'/[� • ._ .i<.n4 - •n. `� 11 .pflagaisivi 1. _ cam . ' 1 - '` : _ ' z }_-o. �eneWUuna -' = �s m R r -4-. -• 0 , 1 ,, . , , -Irn .n..��.-. � lrj• 4 ey N 'c ��f71 r'row�n'*'' x I 1 Cl ® A U, ear 6061n. OO/I..OIP1/r%x Ootl say r_tl CO Ka*.u.rr x604-5.160.1-e1• 1$odos• ' °+P�q € II,j 71 I _ MONROE AVENUE NE Ip I' 4 i Il I :a s. ¢ • I- a l 111 d o aq -.. 9°9' ° .0 a p1 �" 1e • �+ t as ,+ 1 aA4 h,. __ u 1: .'.;: ' ..' '• 4 , . ... . . _ 18 , a•ANEE4 i a ! ..t., '•• ." '',..-- -t i • ' 's' 2'7'4 LI ii .'', 1'1 ' ":074'''' '''...' ..' / . . ii$ .".. \,, Z ,_.j. ill • , • 1 1. . .. ; a1 ° N II • 4 r. a D q� ;: 0 1eA I, �� +.: ; • II _01 , ;1EC]f1E't8.1: Ir. I • 41 1. IH l\d _M I •E+r.dr` • Ifr{{a..�. '''•� 4 -+. "i1 _,Y _ 80 p,.� .}'; _��"<��t ',. 9I : Li 9°-40 $ - a gg E ( 1 . '5 1:` \_ "I ` • / d 2 € 8. i ,« EE•• . i o ,te E I: ;' 5.5 € ` I 14 .Ai 'P I 9104. S 'i4 . MPri9Y V 262366a, 262]6.•RIii Or°EgiC.0 f - • _ UNION AVENUE 1'�:I1 ®®®®®®®®®®®® ®®®D®1>D_ a 0 coo oe o0000000 5g4,5 l s a "ze c s aog "a - y > aIR ii pilQ11v11 gag gl,n0 IF8 $! , Y N Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y yp$g3R3R5:1 'q yy 6 > ; k ; ; ; : ^ w ; ; S ; K' ; ;; s ; ;n S v$: 1 ! g Z mr'mv.K°E. yA U 55P k9 sL g41q1 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 F p 8 S Z . hiovv0(.K.E 5555555555555555SaAAi ° I 5 Al A g�® s�Q gl� ^It^�Q ^ I^^t® Ni^^_�� W. ^�Q s�� ^�® g�P Tr; ^^^Raig ^/Q ^Ig ^ig Tig 'Pgg ^^AIig ^i8vi, :316.1 g A Sq sg' - a.4" x a$� as' slA as•sP =8 _g, 4 s$ : 2=-1 31 aa_ s _ 5 a ss=- s s g g O s .. s ,. as _ o s _ a a eep' =e =a, ,., _ `s� s sa s _a s s pvs > 1„A,. 4K, _R- , _ _ _ .. _ A ., AKA~ 4 7 Y - HA - - •• 1 4 4 4 =4 =; 4 4 = K = a " 4 - A a !A s4 > — r°.. �� b.16..I A IOl kw.I .wlu. Q.GH'q VS 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH 1.9.➢M ". �` MEI ' 6042 „or t(`= KENT.WA 98032 I m _➢ �.d d ASSOCIATES COMPANY PRELM�IARY GRADING AND (206)261-6222 1,,,, ,•.., 701 DEXTER AVE NORTH STORM DRAINAGE PLAN I"t Y (206)251-8782 F.A.X w� • CM6 ENGNEEIVw6.Inc wnrnc. °" „„'. SEATTLE,WA 98109 . CI, 3 ``''+o..°M,`\• =••• c•u,^+w•nnI SENATES ..o.!.o-av-n (206)285- 300 11P Belli • APR 3 01997 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CITY OF .- -� Natural Resources PUBLIC W±;�'�:i� I rti..� +L HER Lands KALEEN COTTINGHAM Supervisor DATE: April 28, 1997 TO: Greg Zimmerman, PE Admin. Public Works Dept . 200 Mill Ave So. Renton, WA 98055 FROM: David John Weiss Resource Protection Specialist South Puget Sound Region SUBJECT REVIEW OF: Union Plaza Shopping Center ACTION SPONSOR: Northwest Prompters PROJECT: Timber Harvest / Land Conversion [] We do not have an interest in the above project and have no comments on the proposal. EX] We do have an interest in the above project and wish to make the following comments: A *forest practices permit will be required for the harvest of timber associated with this project. cc: Dave Dietzman - SEPA_Center DNR SEPA#: 011752 • SOUTH PUGET SOUND REGION 28329 SE 448TH ST I PO BOX 68 I ENUMCLAW,WA 98022-0068 I FAX:(360)825-1672 I TTY(360)825-6381 I TEL:(360)825-1631 19 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer RECYCLED PAPER* LIIJ & ASSOCIATES, INC. ' Geoteehnical Engineering Engineering Geology Earth Science April23;''1997 Mr. Peter Rosen Project Manager • ' PlanninglBuildirig/Public Works Department m 200 Mill Avenue South - - . Renton,WA 98055 :. = APR Dear.Mr. Rosen: VI, '&vrP . GFR �NNINc ' Subject:• .Liquefaction Potential Analysis. Union Plaza Shopping Mall • , • NE 4th Street and Union Avenue NE Renton,Washington City of Renton Application No. LUA-97-034,SA,EFC I:,&A Job No.:7022 Regarding to the Advisory:Notes by the Environmental Review Committee on the,potential.of liquefaction. at the site of the subject project,we provide our response as follows: The Puget Sound region is classified as Seismic Zone 3 bythe UniforimBuilding Code (UBC).. The type of 'soil most susceptible to liquefaction during an earthquake is a saturated, loose; fine- to "medium-grained, •sand deposit: A loose.saturated sand deposit,.when subjected to vibration, tends to compact and decrease in volume. If the sand deposit is unable•to drain;•pore,water pressure will increase. .If the pore. .water • ' pressure .is.allowed`to build up by continuous shaking;.a quick' condition will be reached when the pore pressure equals the soil effective overburden pressure at some depths.: Under this' condition, the sand , 'deposit becomes liquefied andloses'its load bearing capacity. - The .subsurface-conditions of the site,were explored-with. 17'backhoe test pits, with the test pit logs - presented-in our report entitled"Geotechnical Engineering Study,:Proposed Shopping Mall; NE 4th Street and Union NE,, Renton, Washington," dated March 18, 1997. The site were found to be underlain by , unweathered Vachon Till deposits of very dense silty sand With'gravel at depths from 2 to 4"feet below. existing grade. Overlying the unweathered till are thin:layers of medium dense Ablation Till and medium- dense to dense, weathered Vachon Till. 'The unweathered-Vachon Till has a very high-shear,strength. ' Groundwater at the site is limited to isolated pockets of perched/water.of small quantities: Consequently, it r` " is our opinion that is unlikely for,liquefaction.to occur,at the subject-site ' If you have any questions regarding this letter,please feel free to call us: 19213,Kerslake`Place NE • Seattle,WA '98155-3242 Phone (206)483-9134 • Fax(206)486-2746 'April23, 1997' Mr. Peter Rosen . L&A Job No.7022 Page 2 • Yours very truly: LIU&ASSOCIATES,INC.- 4.1 Mfr31 dB S)p 77'683 w. J: S. (Julian)Liu,Ph.D., P.E. ' Consulting'Geotechnical Engineer: • Copy to: Carl Colson/Olympic Associates Company, Ricky Chang • LIU,&ASSOCIATES,INC. , On the I$*4' day of vt 1� , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing eiRC drexevv►t v\o-. mn INwd c.1ive c k ii it documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Dick Anderson Department of Transportation KC Water Pollution Control Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher Department of Fisheries David Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Sue Rumery City of Seattle Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom, Fisheries Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Rita Perstac Puget Power (Signature of Sender) Savnct �-� STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 6 /b/PA 1t . SGE�-t-/C. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 12/// /, • ;: `�;vM • Dated: `7/1 fg `� ,G��1 Notary P is in and r the State of Was if g,tc Notary (Print) /4� Jet::Jet::%f=o 4�� 1 My appointment expires: "(pr.?, q� ' . " Project Name: un,airk P S yvn Cebi e r- Project Number: —03.I`1 sA EC. NOTARY.DOC %% CITY ' OF RENTON ..IL 1 `r, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 15, 1997 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section • PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and,Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on April 15, 1997: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. Location: 3904 NE 4th Avenue. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on May 06, 1997. Written comments and requests for reconsideration shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington, on May 13, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval (SA). The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing.lf the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. If you have questions, please call me at(206) 235-2719. For the Environmental Review Committee, Planner Project Manager cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Sue Rumery, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Rita Perstac, Puget Power AGNCYLTR.DOC\ 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. Location: 3904 NE 4th Ave. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on May 06, 1997. Written comments and requests for reconsideration shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington, on May 13, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Site Approval. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Publication Date: APRIL 21, 1997 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot • c. , CITY -OF.R NTON iIL . i% Planning/Building%Public Works Department • -Jesse Tanner,Mayor •• •. ' ` " • - • • , - . Gregg Zimmerman P.E:;Administrator . April 16, 1'997 Carl J. Colson Olympic Associates Company ._. ' 701 Dexter Ave N#301 •- - . :Seattle, WA 98109 :- . : •. ; ;. SUBJECT: :` Union Plaza Shopping Center • . , ' , Project No. LUA-97-034,SA,ECF. ; Dear Mr.'Colson: : ; • . ; : • ' 'This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have 'completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project: The Committee, April 15, 1997, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: - . • - See enclosed Mitigation Measures document. - , . The 15 day comment and appeal period for:this,project will run concurrently. The 'comrrient/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on May,06, 1997. 'Written comments'and requests for reconsideration shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land•Use Review Supervisor. - Information on the project file •and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building;:Renton,',Washington: 98055., Phone:,' '235-2550.• Appeal procedures are . available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building: • 'WAC 197-11-660 states that the'responsibility for.mitigation measures may be imposed upon en applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action.- Since .an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project,•any mitigation measure established by the ERC not:directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. • - • Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives,:as'appropriate,'(e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project,if you have ,';specific questions. This information will assist you in:planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to `exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so.' - ' . , -" . • ' • A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in'the'Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington, on May 13, 1997:at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval • (SA). The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. 'A copy :of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing.If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. • If.you have any questions or desire clarification of the'above, please call meat(206)235-2719. - ." " . :For the Environmental Review Committee, • • •• ' - ' : .. • - :, sk),\.I .. Peter•Rosen Project Manager . , • • cc:'. •cc: Northwest Prompters'• : - Parti es- of Record , .'. • . DNSMLTR.DOC ' • `200 Mill Avenue'South-Renton,,Washington"98055 - . 6N Thic Hann,rnnfntne cf1.% r rnrvrinf n,nenriol On i nr,ef......c1 inner ' • • -• ._ . ,CITY-OF RENTON _ '- , , .. ' DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE . . • -(MITIGATED) :_ - - - . MITIGATION MEASURES • " • . ' APPLICATION NO(S) • ;= • -' '. LUA-97-034,SA,ECF ' • • • . - :APPLICANT: :. :. Northwest Prompters - PROJECT.NAME:, _ '"Union Plaza Shopping Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for •a retail shopping center and offices, • ' consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be - ' •`via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. " - • , LOCATION OF PROPOSAL • ..,3904 NE 4th Avenue • ' - - . • 'MITIGATION MEASURES z -..; .\ - - -• __ Ste,✓xr'rt .�� 1` - ,: , " - 1. The, applicant shall pay .the .appropr'iate Fire:Mitigation Fee,at "a rate of $0.52 per ' ' .square foot of new construction This.,fee:is- estimated at."$41,857.92. The.Fire , - Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. - : ` ; ' 2.• : The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic-Mitigation.Fee of$75 for each average daily - " •,`trip associated with the project.':-The.traffic mitigation;fee is estimated at $142,068.00 . -- - , -(1,894.24 trips x'$75" =.$142,068.00). -.This'f• ee is payable prior to issuance of Building . - Permits. •." - . 3. ''The Construction Mitigation Plan shall be revised to restrict haul hours to between,8:30 a.m. - _ to 3:30 p.m..unless,approved in -advance by the Development Services Division. "The • -revised Construction'Mitigation;Plan shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance "of • `Constriction Permits. `•. 7v. , :, (MI TIG_A N•O4 N- E ,�'OF:RENTONCANCE _ . :.:CITY. SIGNIFI RMINATONOFTED) , - :_ V • RY'�NOTS•ADIS• APPLICATION NO(S): : :;`.LUA-97-034,SA,ECF' -APPLICANT Northwest Prom ters :P PROJECT.NAME:•" Union Plaza,Shopping Center., •::.f DESCRIPTION OF.PROPOSAL . Proposal ,for ,_a, retail :shopping center and•:offices, `. consisting of:4 buildings for a total area of 80.,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be - ` ...00ntwo drivewa entries off'NE 4th'Street. • _ . 4 Y :. , '.`, . :: .-. O OSAL::: ,` ,; .!'=: 3904•NE 4th Avenue'. . . . LOCATION OF,PR P - o•tes o�i4 licant:=':: �:��.Adviso "N t - ed"n,con'unction with thee ;The folloitiin notes a• re supplemental information provid i ':.;::environmental determination.'iiBecause_these notes are provided as:in formation_,only,`'they_'" `.�.-,- r ocess or"environmental determinations. :are,not subject to�the.appeal pr f _ fsr, BUILDING .f; - .:i:•�.'� • - r •1.Soils re"•oit,does`not.'contain'the,analysis for:potential.for•liquefaction as required by the"„ -., ;'Uniform Buildin Code 994 Edition:'Addendum"is""re'" uired` `.`:: . ` - 1i' �4 t: FIRE Yi c`. :.:;,: 1.The prelimma fire flows.for each buildin are:BuildingA 4,500 GPM,"Buildin B '5 250: ' : -- GPM, Building C. 3,500..GPM,•Building_D=:.3,250.GP,.M. The:primary fire hydrant for each' '. : buildin is,required to be'within'150_feet'of the; buildin•g.Additional hydrants are required within :" • 00 feet of each building at the rate"of:one hydrant`for'each n1;000.GPM of required fire,flow or; '= - -- "` '- ,ortionthereof.-Fo exam"le, Building" would require'6"hyydrants• one within 150 feet and 5 ; -.:; "`'': "', .,, 't i 300 eet: ,.� - +al drants i h n f 1.'addition h" w s " - Y -,::' 2..The fire flow for Building B may not be:available in the waterriiainsserving this area. If not,„.' `.`.._`,:.'_, :• the type of.constr'uction can be changed,to:lower the,required fire flow•. The preliminary.fire flows were calculate• d on type.......,-....,N`construction ;• >•: ':.3. Sprinkler systems are required in,Buildings"A'and B. Building C:• and D may be required,to be: < :";':": sprinklered if.they are serving alcohol,and have"over 5,000 square feet.of undivided floor area.. _ :Fire alarm systems will,be based+on the actual•'use of the buildiingr"• - y r,. - z : '`: ,'•;;_;: `4.Separate plans and;permits are reguired.b the Fire Department for sprinkler,: . Y.. - system and hood suppression systems for resta•urants .. ..:::. .:..... ..•._` -- _ - 1� •-- - tit- - - �.S'i +ra _ S• ;.'7.t '4 l,, `.rr ' "v% , �'Y: 1 ufa it -� — fit. n-J' 1'} �4 L�_ h'Oi.. {'Y 'P. ^s.f :fir fit'. - - L, :1 ..ii' - .j' - - :fig , . . ...... • ,,, ,. ,.. - . . ..- .'..... ,... • . . , • ..,..,.. .. ..,_,_. . . . . .. ,. . • • . - .•. -- ,...... . . -,......• ..,•••:-.•-' --•..,_:;..,3,:.:?••••,-,--;.:-..:_-....-•-•,-.i.:'•••--.;-"••:••:-;;;;-•':::-..::•';.-.-1•:•.--,,7-•.•••::-..5.,-,:'--:-.::....-:,...-....,-.:-,...-..:,;....:-..., , , , _..., ::-...-;._,-:87.,:'4:-:,--1;VJ ..::..:,,!.Jg-::•.•.,:::::::.'-'.-.----.-,:--,-.'-) ::-...,....::-',1,..- --....--'.'-:*:---.:: :,..,..'-.:::...:,::::::::'.., . ....-...;!.: .:;::::-:::.,'...,:-.:,.:.-. .-;.._::.'::::':--,....,:--,.,::,,:--',',:::.,::....::.-::,..:,,..„.„:„-..-7:-,-,::54:- '?,.:-,-.-_-__-::.--...-.--......_-.::._.......-..;_-,:-...:.-.i-,--_-.-::-.._-,....,..,._:.-_-::,'..,. i.• 1,:-....,...:;:--, . -. -,:- -....-2:-;.--,',J.•-•-tr-:-..--,--,:.--,•-.-':,:-:-;.-:,_-:'-../.-:::.:'-';':..,:.':::'..._-:.--i:...:-'-_::::.':::_.-::::',. ._.--J.,---•:'-,--.....-;:-!-„-,,,,,':.::•:.-_-.--.-,-.--:...... :::: .'---., _.:-.:-:::,,-,-_--...---..-._ --: . --... ;-..:_. ---- . J. ,..: -....::''','.,1:";,....;,•••.:',:--"--'::::'--;;.'"--.":,•---,.,-"-,.'.:!."..-,j,--'2"- ..,':•`:::::-.-''.<"-_-:':-_,..-"-:-..--"-:::::.----,-;•-•-•,.:-'-:-.7,,-.J.-:-.1,..",-..:..-.._-...---,,-,..-..-,•:.-,--:.,.., - ,.•-.-,-.,-.:..-._.--.......- -,, .- .., - , -. - ,.•- . .• . -.,.... :. t-.-...:--.--...„--,•:',...„--.!;,.'sZ.I.z.'-:'..;?,:.:,,,."]....,. ',.."--•-•'•"..--,'•:,•-,:••:-..,-..--,',.'4:':::-"-..`,:;....,,-',-,•"=••••fi';','i•••::,-;••••.:;-:"..•-;•••,-;-:•:---;•.::,-;-•..-._•-'.: -;- •-•'•.1.-. •- ,...•...--.-."...". •-;. - .:.,"• :*.-, -":"' :. .- . ' : -; " •.- •-• ..-1' .--.- -• .• ••• ""•:-.I- 1-•-'•7."-/-••'•;. :,••••::•,'.':'•••;,..1":•:.-":•,--•:-.',"-;':-:-••.'.:-:''..-':-::. .',1":;-:.::•:•I'".•,•.;"•••;',-;,-.'•"-:•-.-7'1"-i.'.'•••:;.'-.".:::?."-",•-i-•-1:':-•:;-.-T•:---"•:' "I:-•,-" ,,-:",•---17' ".•..•:"...--.:. '.,1"•••.'".--•,--•:--. ;'-,' ".. •-•-••••• ....:-."• " •. --•'. --:••• ":•:--.".:' •••.• ' ••-•-•-"'-- --. .,. • •:-..--1...,,....,:'•:.:•: ::`,,.,-.,",, --;.:,...'".-..,-.Z.:-...-"...... .:-",,-,...:•:•••••-:::...:,•;•••••=',:;;•).'?•': ShoppingCqilt,1" ;;".;•"'".:•••.'•:--'--":.1 •":::•:::,-•:••-;,•••"-•••,••;:::1 ''..•••::•.:•;:--. '..-;- ;...-• • . ... :-.•:•-•••: •.' 2-••:".•• :. • ••. • . ; -"--.•-.'"•.•‘.:"..:,..:;-".,.:::- .'.".......,-;•••.,•,;•:,•:•-•,-,••.fs....-•";'•••••••--;i;iii. ....,....,..-,-.':,..--.:...:-..-.".,-,.,...‘-,.. -;,•:.•:,...••••-••.....•-,- .,..•...,,..,-..-::-!-.....-:- .-.: -...•.-.:-;•.---.‘...;.-..::-;.',',:. • • - ,, - :-•••• -•.:-. •-....... --• •-• .•:"...,;-• --l.'•,-- •• -.:•--:•-•-. .,;•:.:,.-••••••••••:-.:•.1-,...;.•.*-.: Union 034,SX-(Continued) .'.,'-'?...---:;•-''.---..::-•:•..,...•-•,•1.....••,.........'.... ....-:•• ,.*.'.' .. ..:.--•,.:::.-,./.:'-:•••••,:",•:••':•-•-:. • -• ••-• .• _-...--..- s-'• ••••• - •-; -.:•..•••••••-: •"..• F ••'•••••• ': '- •' • •---- 'LOA'977- (9°. ...,,•••'•••••',.....;,:•••:•`:•:,:•:.i.•,':.--:-..:'•-_..-•••,-,.:...-:-....-...'-_•, •.--•-••••:,.•.•••••,'••• .-_•-.., :.:••-. --•:-:.._-._•::• , . .- . .-,-.. ..,.r,- • ...,..• ., ... ..:. -• . . .- :,_ ...-....:,,..'•••••--,.-•••••.••• Advisory Notese .•••: .:-1..•-:•:-.;,_,:-.2 :::.•-•,,,"-.;:-....--.ff;- ...r„.•••••• ::::.--,:...:1•::-.'.:. : ...:••••-.••• .-..•....;• .._•_••.--.•...•,..- ..,•: ,...... .-... ; : . :••• . --11•••••'-'•••••::';:•.1' Pag '7:2.7,-,-',.•;-..-1.:-. 1;:.."':-;.•::...-:.-',•2:::,:,..,...--;.,...".-.,:‘:-::,:_?..7-:•,-';.:;‘'!--'"-...-,•,;.1::-: ::•:. •'-',.,, ,,:',.:;:S..,:::•...i...:.';',.:.•:::-',...-:.,;,'...-,:'-'......_...--:: '-•'.1,. ,•-•.-:_.::-.-mill be •- . ,- - ,-...-.- ....-2,•:.;,,_,.-;:-;---.'...,,:.. ".• •••:•)!.;',••••:-::•:•-:-.„.....,•,......,2---;-::',.','' '•:::-. ..'''.-•.- '"--'''' -•-•':''''--7'•' systems "' .will . . ..".. '' • '''''';;'•-•:'••:.:•::••;, :::••••.,',Ir'.;--'''',-.';•:.-;:':H:..-*....,:..•::::',:.., ...:• •.,-•-•. --,.:.:..1„:,--...'..•:.1:1' . ..:c.:.....,'•'-‘1'...-•':'-.•:..:-......-;•••••:. l• -control -ation __'' -.- : .•-: ;,-', , . . .• 1::•••'-''..' .;-•••••,,%.::., .:,'•••',--,.-;',..--,.--,,:-.'....,-!.,,,-„-•-.....-:•-•_,.;,.!..,,. ..-5.,.-,.-:---- ..•-,::-.:-.-:--;------s..---r•-_-.--_: Ai ri'fire pkiCilffig ‘fees:•:.• • :.' •.-'-• • '•.. i.........-.......••...L.•••:,•:---;2,.,..,,..,::-..:•...-: ,,,"•......-...-..;:•:;--:-.-.,..:.2,,...:. ::::„...:••;•,,ir--; ,.--.,..;!... -,...:::" ..•%.:.:-...'..,:•::-..:'•• ,. •.-:-..-.'••:-., •••;.. (buil..no, •for dom., ,__ (sDC/ •,.... '... ;•.,;.•,•..... •••:. -.s..-...-•;-• • : '2.:••••:' '':-....--1-1‘2...•::-...'-1-----:'':•:-. .:-;?..-'.-.,.•,.,-;•--.•: -':-- ......'-•_•''..:_'::::'--_--:-. ,..- c assembly's (building iiit,e,,,mninent.dh,rg ! ...:-..:,-•,-,•_...';.•• ',',-....---•.'.•;•-;-.. • . '-',...::.', ...,••,.',;:.: REVIEW,..---••:-:',-.....••:,...-••---.,--:"•, ----•._'-c: •_. ...- DD-V . . .".".-- -development'• --. ' .-" : . " •••••. •-• -'..- :-,•••. '• .'.-'.;.,::'.-..•: -,. . PLAN• ,•••,.,..,.,--,,?,, :-..i.•,-...:.,...:•-•,...,.. •..—fire hydrants and codes/regulationssystem ...:-...,.::-..1,•_•:•., ,:.--;, , --..,:': -,- " ' . ......':• J----:.• - e water ;., -•;••:•:::.."-,.._4,•-•_. ..::, r... • .., • .,.. -.,::::-and .•-•,,,: • -.•--.:.,....-:::.,.:,--•;.• . : .. ''.::::::'''''::?•- •_R:,-AiVate..,.. ....; extension, .. -6rrent_fir :.: irb-e reciyTer:-.7-.;:,:--.,,..•.-....,•.':-.-,.. .-. paving '''''.:•!..7-•:-":.:;,- '-:.- r :•••.:•.-••,..,•:-,•::' •-::,..----_,...-• &ham. P • meet:c -..requirements,itieeir,. ....,:;::....-.:.,..,....J-- -;_„. cfitet current p!ty..i.,-....,f..:... ,::,-.... .: . . -....,••• - ' ••:.-wate- - and must. -meet UP..L; gross site •,.:•••,;...,..,,. :-.........:--_...-....„:••:.:,,-.....::,:,......,„,.. sidewalks, meet .11. :-..._. ,,.. .,-.--; ,..'..-..-• -.-:'.. ' be 113 per . . • , , ..,.............,-...... • - . ized to . ot of ,:„„...., ._....,. •., ..,•:-.gutters, must •:•::-•.-• •..,.. - -, ....-•-.. :..-•-•• -...•';.•-•: - ' •• •-....'.-:':::: requiredrequired .- ,uare!b...., - .•,• .,...---;-.• , .‘;.•, •- •,..,.::••••;:. •'::;'" curbs, g .required and ttl!y..„...,.. ._:-...:-• . :----... ........: .-,... NE 4th existing ., - - ..-; .....::- ... -._ • of$0•,..,,,.::.•_-:---- '....,.:::•.:_-,:-....,,,-,.'.. ;: --------:'tieei to the has 'site will,4.C.:.-!---.,,-----:'-'-:----..-i .:.---: 2---;---;..' -';----: .....-;''-buildings:1.-'.J.--•..-.-',..: ‘.....--.2-..:. ortation . .,...... ;.t...,., -....,.••....::TranS ....... .._::,; •-ents.::7:.- - 'veWy."-,•..;,:'---"......--:•:1--.--•:-.::-.:1::::.:-._::-1::-,••• •••:::'_-'---•-•‘-••-••;- ".::-...,..,--,;‘.-. ..• iob9§e• ' ',.3d...-.1:-:-..•.-.:!•::f .':...''....:''-...:', ...:.. d ' tee.et illp• •--,Nes44P.9-..,--:;.--:::.,:::•_:';:.-.:- ,:-..„1.:-....--:„....-i-,....__,,,.: 7,---..-:i:.-- ,,ii,i.O.-r9g.••••$80 lierc4 Si.•-:-!;-•;,:":••••••;,-''.••••••'::----',. '''••••:-': -'.:••'. ch the --:.•.•-• , -...• m , At lights...---d--- .---::--'.---..--.',7:-.-.•-.-,:,---, '!'; ::,-.'.;;,;g::'..-' ..”'',..77.--'i•-'•:'•. ::.r syst-!-- ,• - •st is. . ••- site Pr ,•-•...•-..,•••-•:•!•...,:-..,.•r.•,........- • ',: -..- - ••-•• .•••••••:... :-!•-......:-.-s.: ;•--•'... ,.r--,• ridar -,•,.••••,:::,..:..:-:-._.•.• .,.,••:.:•-;,•_.,:•,-,.,-.,,,,:;.•••„..c.,,-. , ..-spwe,_....- the f gross •: ..--.::•:•:-.s.,•••••:.-...-•-•,_-----,-.-- - des/St?...„..-_.....,..-... -..:-;.-,:c•---,..:.-"..:_•,-.--.)4,-.- •---‘•saniterY,- ired:a9,-- .,i,..foot 9,.....,-.,---, .-_,..',.-.-:. -.-,..--:.::::::..: -..-,-2:i...--....r..-.....-...• ,.--.:.. ..- • , . . • - .:-co -----r--,-,,,,-,., ,... ,........--. -g-.of VIP . iike.requ ,, ,•- qua'..\, ;\:.:-....-";';', ".- '...-...c--,-i'-:-:' .,:', =-.----11-f':: •-•:.'--,......./, '.-..-. .., '-.. ' ,. ........:..:,...:.... ............:;....,,,..;,:.:,:;:..5-.: -..... sewe. -,...„..-..-:-...:,, , oiiSio.,!.,.;.,,,s ifii.: g-,078,p7.7,,.,;;;„':,::, ..,,\•,,y•-\,.,\?:.-',"-:-.,;.'.:;.,.!..%.---1-::', , -.3::,:*.:.•:.:.:-. .;:• ...'':-.-'••I' - sanitaiy.,......,....:„..----..iit.ail e -....-iiiiect!P,' ,.a at$`.7.!*. ,:.,....':-•"‘•'•`',''-.v,:-.'"••••,'•:• ",;2,,;,1,.-.' r::•-'••=;,.?.=.••-1,",':----..-""---: :,-•'-.ioni•in • -.•.....:1,::-...-,..,:•-•.-;-......-',-.-.2. will e.pqL1..! --.--,.g6vier •1? ..re•qqir -7..„,.',:::-'•••••.••••„•;••:,, -•••;,-:-'.-...,•,,c,\.--...?,,.•,:::,i-•-.\--..,--•••-•ith us-• li be .? --.1•:_..--,.. .:',--.- . thin the ••,... .:-..,-s:-.- _••,-,....-----2, . ,..e s!te... 4 ••:.'SIC19... Sjwill b ,,,,,•,••••,•.-,:.:-:-.:•••,.,,,,.-....-;..:',...::-.-,•-•,,,•:•••::.:-.::::'•-,....,.-.k,..,•-•'::-..-,- --.-i plan'41. • •tion wi --• d st•••• •••'.. .•-,,,-• L... . . . •_...,....•••,.,.f. - TH ''' SIL''.'7-- -e) fee..-..,,.• ,.,,.:-,-..-v:'_...,---. -. _2-.!....!.,.-f-;,-;,,,...,;',2;'.',',..'`.''''':,-..0- ntr9 -., ,,,i0filtra uire -„ .•.: -.• .-: - - , er(si'.--. ,'•'..',•''':''';f:'t.'=';:'j,`- '.:?:;.: '',.,...,:.....,g :. itsio11..•7- 4pititiOn!`" • be re9 •_---,-,-. -.',- , .,-,,•..-•.' . . ,i '-•-.•,...-:::•:': ::-.:--., ‘:'-:-.::::;r:,..-•_:'',W1, • ' eWr temporary ,. .,iii.s..pe,.7 b6 fees will..... ,..,-.--.. :-::....---.-.,-.:::-..-....-:;...:.-.._... -•:. .-.. Sanitary::::::i•.=,,,.,..:::-.:'..:?.- i.,..:,:-..",'.:...;.'Afi-...i::f:/,:::',:-..:-..:1:=F:':;'..:::'•.:...‘--::. 'n:e'ahci. ''ire7a:1•6•V-,tPq"s -wile(,(s.,-.-,11, ' ::-..-.. ..---••".-••••-..''.4"•-•'• '2-:-•-v-- '"'."-••-•.."-''•;-. ". :-:•."""•• .'•.•':••'• . ---- .:I:,..._.:,:-,,,,,::":,..,...?".:-:',.c.'.'•'•.,••••--:':-rm.--"'-'biairiaa.,.,,,•••-•.`-•. .-T".•ii6iiii drainage ii,•0„C1.9P4e-iS0.0a9eiie .--•.--• :-;•':•"--;, ../{i-•"•:::.-:".'- - ,:•••••:•::: .•;..--•:".".::"•,•••::''•---.•'•".;i"...s.•-•'::•.•••::.:•-•-••r-• . •-•-•-•-.•- e -.."...-.....,:-,;;;.:._.,-;;..tto7,.....-i,.,14-;',•-" , ..666kepyV., ...fiii104.t.::,yr...-,-6 -9n-tpe...",....:,...e..-..:;.•••---;.,:.:,;..:.--.;.:•,,-:..,,,J..;',•. :.-. . •.--. .......--...-:,.-..•.:;6-e•i.:*,.... !.'_?..,-,:,-.._:,---...--...., -.•:-. ': '':'::'.:"..•:-''' ,;•••••':•-i"-•:•••::-.-1:,-'yhe' ite'41! require.L 4 withe re trii ••ii:rale,'0911? .!a..--,".- .:ii:'....:.:;.::.-'_-:n.:-:;:i;.--.:--:L.:!...;3,7.-:-,..4/:. :,..,..:.:-.:.•..nn sites:: Police •-.,;:::•:-...,-,.,::••„•-:::•.:::-.••.::•,• .. ,,.,..„ ,,..„..,.....:,.:-_.:;.,,:.....,.,,,,..,... ,accordance rainag ..s eiii impervious .,structi, . is iincieri--,. ....--;........,,,,.,..;,..,-,,.:.:::-:-..... .,...:_-.:..i.;::. . . ••,...,,,..-.,......... ,,.•.:.,,::,..,:::.....--... ._,e1 via a...0.•-•,•_..*60t.-p!r1.„,.,...--... ;;V:.--•- •, •::::;•!•_1::: :-,- .....:••,--:•- construction, ....r-1:::-:::•-•'-'`'...--•: .iSirPill-',C9:-.1-cle-thc t s site•• ,,,,.$eda! •';,,,,::,ii. :•_.-,-',.....--..*:;...,,i- •::--,-''..-' ..:•-•-••:::':•,:;••••:,•-•-•;,.."--ItCliY21 per- c19 !.7..•:•-1:-.;•:-S,. ;',. •••,,:,•:•:...;-...-.••;;•-,, ,,-,i'....•,-i.--:::-...;.;---'....;;.-:-...--••••,''-..•-••ri•-ttihef,P.:tiiiiCi.hb.,!"bi.inerriOctilearfileuuSedP§.-7, 9idijiirgiqriieo.,t viith.:0'..k.??onlnYeedfc) 11 .1teioh.siieP... :ij trailer any on . : • ...r:.......1 .4'.....,..e.:::;:--..':-." PPLIOEnig6. .:CfPPiTIrill1Pfeti8'e)r.1• :•tfel1:10'PliPonbY4f.i'0•tikili;ltis:rilefal dead-bolt over .' as locks yii!,....,........,.....,......... ..., ... ... '''''.-:•:•L'''.":1-'''''''.....'::';':''''•••Tii.:P' ligh° td parkingnttli!ifiheaP°c!IiiCifiliOlt,i1,19ifiiie..1(0?.:sit;iiwkiii41Y,1:16Pdch6vif`1:1!y loc.i!kri ala7..."..._ t......rrl_.:.: ......,..i........,:::. -...1',••,:'••••••:••'•:.:,--:••.'•-_-,...,:;__-d-6-thitieh.7.....6-naLiOa. ..duty,,iii..,-i.e•60yerY.,.,iiidosa...et,:---,iidincinP-r..n the : --.-. . ..'..:.:::::,.:::. -...::::.-...,-, '.':.::::.': ..,.•.2,...:. a thief The bb9uildirig*lc.!: '-...,,:::......-::::.-72.,:.1:,....,..., : ....: '..-...._.--..,,....... ..,-,:.,....:........: ,.:,,,,...,:...,....::;,.......,,.:......i. 1jurill)0r•S.---rfliri6e0.0."vYrehrY--PY,' ••••irol04TP-1-':::.-...., •-:...-')..,•':.-,:•:'-'•-•••-••••••••..,... .-•':'•-•---=-'•.-,....:::.:•-•' ,-.,..-...),•.:-.,.;...:,'„....-.. f..-...:,••••,--, -ttr help prevent.::.4 ',1191:01119_i.ii•-:.',..:,-,-....;...,-„,-.:- :,,.,l.:,,•,'.-•.::!.....-,..._:,•i-;,,:....•,:„.:,...;.--,:,.......•....,..,. . .. ., :-.:•••:',--,-••••••,'' office,windows,to --and security A-:•-•-,:::''..--,....:.'....-::: -:; ' '.1.. .. .-...•'..•-. .,'-`:,.;,=-:'1,-..:-.--:.. .. ''•.. f light11.1,. • reviewecl....•-•,....,...... _,...-:: .• . _ -....---.•.-,-,-,, • ' •doors •ndeu, ..---•• --•,••••.-•;:::-........-:.•:: ---..,.:-':-:.-,----.-:,-,....,........ - lion 0 should be ...•,.- ...-...--,,,,,,-..,-;". •-..:.,..... .. . -i-o-ini.:::•-•aric.--..sin-6.-'..,,;::::1,.,.....••••„.•,;:..,,,..,...,...,. ..,:.::::.:::::.. l ,... dor _'•„io-mme.......--• •--,•.:..--. : .:•;••••-.-.-__--..-••,_ •:-_-•-•_'..--,-......---, ...:- -i,4mine •review .. -.•'•_---::---'...,:,.-'..--.-"v•-•-•. --.•:-..---•--,--. ..-. -, .;:-•-,.-.'.......-:,..:-..-,-..e.e- iirghly r .7--..--•-•-•-.::,•::-',:,;',-.-..-.:---",,--..:::;;-",; ', .;.••!::•;..'r..7::-•-,;,-:.--. '•-•-.:'---:•-• r;for determination FAA-reY!-. '..•''..\'','*.:::-,-.'-'.::....'f'..''''''''..,....:-..,`J.:-;-:..-:,:•.:',r'.....,-...- ....:.:,-..::.-,:::::: ..‘,,:!..:.:5,•:::ii.alsp -,..• ,..-,..,-..., :•.•: ..•••;.:....;,,:.•,-,.•;.-:.. .,.. ,.:.•_ _,.,-.:,--•-•;,_•••',....--•,:•-- ••••:::,,..-: •...strudtio --. suit.0! ,r.,.....',:.:•---,...-,..•:- -..,-,' ,:..-.--:_ •-•=!.',...::.......,--,•-:::',...-.;;••••.-,..-_::-.; --... ?.,---.• . ...•.:,--......i, ....-:::::_..,......,-:•-•-•-: ..,.,.., -,.-,-. :•••• -, .' ed..•99" Cle.','F. ,!,,,,_',.:,-.'-'„Yi...,,:z%:•:',::::':::•-•`,"•':::',.•'::-•.::-. :'.•:- ..-..-,:--,•-•:,..'•;":,,,::::i'''''.-':`,-........-1.,-..-•:•::::,--.:- i-,....:::_:-..-r•-••-••••- •".-.. -...''-•-••'-- :',..;,.. ;•:•:...:.•-•:.1---141OkT.. •:.,...:-..:... 44OiiOe:9T,-'-'i tiei#rq ?.....- 4,•-•,;•,:ii ,..: ;:;-,.•-•, ..-,•:.•;:.--:1-•,,,:,•..•-?•,.::..:-..;-::--._-.--:-,,F.•=...-.. ..;„...,-- ,L,,...666-0.ipte....:,..i ..,..,..........„.:.„ AI, . ...-- .- -,;-,,1:iiiitt?196,,,,Iriiion..p. -if.,-:,,,,..,- --..---::,:,..-".....-.-......-,:.-.,'.-:-; . iifelY.,-P .....:f,-':.,....r. ;±;-:•.-. •-'- •-• •-;•'. • .--' ••.: •.-Requires submittal. . determination perm.i.:•;:,•.,...,4,.:-:,-,,'-',;.',. .,-.-",:-...,•'.,.....•-.-. :;:..---,,..(-_,;, ,,.:.-.-..,.-.:::.,t,•"-c-ily and...--.%,-;....-i....-,--..,..-,-;,'I.,;,:,. . ,••:-.:;.•::.':-7,..--,-;; '..2- :., . ...........-....,.,.: ....-:...., i .i,!.. . .,.„,Building .,. ,L„.. •,,-....:-....::;..:',.:::-..:7.:.,..,,-..,:.:,,,,:7-„,;-,,,,,,...-...-,..:,..:7:: ,-he ea., .,....-.. ._,.....•:.-,:-,..,-:..,:-....,....,-,-. .-.:,,,-;_f„,„,:,.-.:,..,---::-.--..,... .:-,•:-..,.--;-.,.-,'„,..-..„.:_, ........•,. .,....,...„......requirements p9! .!...7-,.....,.•,.:,. .„:-.:,..,..,--.iz-...'.:..,..2:,,,,-,-:-. ...-,-. ..,---.:.;;;--,:-:-.,----:.--7,.if t4e.11 •',.,,,,i.-...:...:.i,, •"-...,....:-..,. .'_=•:'2-•:-...,_-::-.,„• '--:.,•-e,-.;L--,;,••':..;',:-i...,.••,::.=...:,,-;.,,',..t'2 •:-,-.;;-,:,,•,•..'',.-- : rq9,..d..i .09,F .iiciri,pp,. -, -_--:...:,..,:,::.;-,-...-- .:12,--,...-„,.---,--,-..--.,'..,--.-.,:,---:,-,:,-,..--,,,,, :,:y,,..::,,,...,.::...::::;---, pciqrA.--.-: -...-:::,c-:-.,.:.-:-.:::::-..,--.?..,:r...;•:-:: ::::.,,,:::,;-,-,::-7---,,..--,.'...;•.,„..-.::,:_--:,:---;,--s-i,---6ci collection 1 li ate0P.---,`' .•'::•:;.3;'-'.-.:-':' :.`,1- .':-:;!...,'„-,Ii•!..4,1-':-.',::-..._---.,•:-.•::?:.--,.'_-,,•,:::-:--..:;••j..1.,-.':.::::,=-:;--:,, ,-.::•;•`...`:',•.,-,:c.--, ..;.q?.,..,;',-..---...;-.....,:2.;?-•.,•fyiz':-..,'5,----. -. .,..-::::::----...'•:.':_-...-.,•,,.,..--.',-,.-:.'sr.:-:-: - l'.....:::,.-4:;;•';'-i;li4del)9- • :•:•-_:•.j.;-i':;-.:,.: -',.,-•'.•17. 4..?„'-',-..fg.;--.:•---- ,-,- -.:,•,;••ii-,'.',-f'----,..j,•••,-':,`- ;:;-t.•-',.,2i,-..,L'-..-',. •,,•-•.2.:,,,,-. ..,,,-,._.,:•...,,,.•:, •,„•:--.:. ,.-r.,-,,,•,;c:•;;,:--,. : •'' '''''.'...;.-1''." 'el../..;::':'"-:P;PLANNING;: recyclable 7.1.),...,i•-•'-; .'-',.-'-i,:;.f:-';71;-';' '-' ''.'...`.-12,-,'::',';','!:.:.,:k l'::',,,..:1*.f7.1.t,,,aiir,.; :.{:t±.';',.•:!,*„.',•!,:,-1,1,.:.,,,,.,,,..,-;.,-::::...„..,-.., .,.::::,:e.3.- :::...,11,;!,',;,1;;;;....,.3:: :-, L*._-;,,;...)t,:',F2,1,-"1.,.,,,'.',:. - i -2.:::,-7';', .;..'''.--",:'r",-.•:,:.'..,,..,'.-..'`'',;'' e.and -P:-....:.- :=,-.,....;:.,,--::,. ....,.,......,,,,,‘,,,. .,,,-.;...-,,,,,--.,,-,..-:,:..,--:1,--: ,:7,-....;1,..•,;_-,t;:v....1,-,,7;.'..,,,:-•,--;.,.-1,-;,.,....:',,,-.....-z,,,,,-..--,,,,,,;-,..,„.,--.-:.,,;:-:,,,,,-„,,,:i:.:.,,,.. ..,....,/.....c:,;'''!.,-..,,........-., :-' • dafl0q7--,---- *:::5.i';':-:,;.:!-;',:isis-- ,::;r:ke-:.'14.4-f•T;2',';::::;::%-7§•,':...4,.:.',.-..,-. ;•-2;,•,.-.,,,y,:,...c, ..':,e,:‘,,,g?',..,..,f2.,....'..;':J.:,,-:qs..f.;,74..i.4'.,-,;::,-. ..-,.--,::.;;2.,-.:2:-.'j-,!,,,,'L-;-:.; ;•,.*.,•!:-.-:',-:',•:.:...,i'j...'.1.:',: -..:,..1i..:';).!..::', ,:: :.- --'.:-- to hauling„...,,,,,•;.;:i-'-',.,--..;:c.c.,,.,-.,. .7.7.-:,-:-..2,.:::-,---F.,; -:,---:-,,_.:..-_,,,..,i-•,:-...x.,,;:,...)72,.,;::“',' ,1-•'.';',:,';:::',':',,-;i:,,`A:7;:;7:Viir:••:',75: =‘,1Zr;;;'[.:!:2,-,;:::^:::. .?:s.'„'1::::: :-...-:;:::3.,-C:"':-.!,;.:::._ ._:::',:-J,.'72::',•::''''''''''.:',%.:;.:;:,',:,.',,i',:+:;;:.:':'• . _••---.:,.,'..;',71.;::;-,'::. .:4'::'S'..-- ••;:_.,`'.•:,.Y,,--i.._f:•:.',,'....':.-',.';',''''.::::',-,`,:,.;!:;.Y.:f;-;..":-'....4!,,.::::‘,.;';'-,2:::,...:7:„.-2"1:3,:f,q-31...S:-f:: ::e'ii:,;.1:'-'...i.,.",‘',,,,.Z..-:,,,;`:,,,,:,:rit.;:r. ..-,r?,i-;':,,,,f'4-',.,I,:. :1.,';;:::,',..::';',.-2.-: '-:':-',.-I':',,,;:-.. --,..,.,,.-?,.---,;•-•;,:,..",:••••-•:-..'.,.---‘,-...'-•,,..",':.""'.'.•';.7,* - ' " -.: •-••;:.•"--:',.•-•,-::',-..!.,:„..r.•-c•,`,:.,',;.,•:'•:?-;• -••'---'--'i.. ,":-..;;;,-.",!,- .',-.: ::"-,'.'-,;ii'.-.T"- ..","..-;,;,•.:1--, -„;:";::-'.Z,',;;.,,,„;,,r,•-...""N%",",--;.:5.:.;';;;;.;1;•••,. ••;;I:1"• •,••:'i: •:',••;;;•'/-••:, ':•, :?i'".•::::". ••::i'..-"-.;-,:,;-,"-,..i;-,,,'.. ";,,,-_-.".:J.?.:,;-,."-;•:,,..-7..:::::-.:1.-- ,-....-„,..,:-,,,,.;::'..:-,,-;;:...',-..•...,,i',-.;;;;:',----:::,,.,--:..,::: -— ' -.1-....'-"2:.'-.:::'-.".1". .... .,.- --'...";."-...'"...;'-'.'''-',-•; •-;;T:,•• :;••:• ,:-."-.?::?-".,:•':."-3,;....'ii.'-;,-T;.•:i.-A''lli''•''P,:;-•ii*Lfli:i;4•, ?•"-?. ..•:[4-7"-',:).:' •"„,";!:..-!.-‘,..-,-,:---::::-'•:)-1i;-..;'-''2,•i17.Z:7t7,:,:="-•$2,,,'S•,:•;;;:'--:•%:•-t'•":•.: •.1-•••:-.--.••••::,'.-:.."••••' :".-''''''''••• .:-::...*.'...',7!,-...,...:,-,•:-;-.=,)„...,,,.,,,.?;.z. ...,..-..,;,:,c.,-;„..,..,..,....„1:,:„...:„...,yn,...,,,,„..: ,,. ....-..,,,::,..“... ..,..,:,;;,7,;.;-,1:j.„.7.,;:fi-...--:5-;.!:;.:;-.,f,....-,:•!.:.:,„,..,:,;.:.;,,,,,c.",-:::'. .•...-=',,,:'-,"::;'-'4-;`•,......... zi:,f,,_...:..,,,,,:-:.,,:-• '''' :.i''''5.‘'..,`Y",;',''5:T'''::,;.,,',..•?;•..:-1:•:.:. ,-.‘,..;';::,',';',:-...-.L..;:c.';', .'..-f.`,::....-';' ,`,:.t....'....-:,-,.•,,g,.r,f3). i.',.:7..7.,•-.,,,,:- .. ,-,,.:;7 .1'?,,:•::.':::',..-..',.7...,.f:".i..;. -:',.,"2'....--.•.:•.:1--.J;,-.:7-:`.".•T'-,,,T.' .".. ...-_„:1...'".',.,r,E.:;-.:,'.1-,..:::' ,,-;:?.-,.::::',', -:,...:', F,:.<-',:,',-.'7.:.,--if,-,,c,:.4..74'..;:','..4'':.;:r-.1.''''.4‘?,'.: :',.k,',7:: fi-::: -•:,,-.e.-4:',-:',-": -:::., : 21:::... ',1,.r.:', -.. ."',',-L.;?!:..f.;=',."-,-----".-- • ;..‘„::,.-::-'i'i.:i=:',.;.;',. ,--'1`,.•,:i,,,.c,:-..f'44-:'1:*. ..fj.4:-:: :ii ''.'i.,."::$::::,..:;',::?;;Y:,.--,'';',;:.;.g4,::::,:'.'":.':4:,:_j:.:.',-,';T:.",.7.ri.;"::.."-..L.',:-,j'i,2,4., ,'..'i'::::::.1..'.''''',-':-''' ....:..-..-::: ,:r,i';',..-'..-f4.1-t.':::!,,, ,•`...7 '.F!..i:, ..3a. .?;'•::•:-;; ..1---..:',..-.'i',;:s'T..);:::":.;i:,,':::::'.:i:...:.f:'.' -'4:::.''.1..7.:,-;,:;-,:-.-.. ;::.:',. .;:,, :'-':,.1-1'.'''.. .,-;,-,..'•...,..7:::-.''.-:'; ';',..;',,e7i';:: :::'',-i.-'.:.-.;.iis:-.:•.. ,',:ir,':,....:i'''''...-7:i.::::',V-.',; : :"..:..f4:-.. ...?,',"::::.:'' .:--:".'':.,'!.:-;"1'.,,,-:,:::;'.,:::,?_%.,".,"-..'i-li.-;:.,.,-...1. :-in.'i''.r'-':-'•f•--- --.---'-'' CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NQTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-034,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT NAME: Union Plaza Shopping Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3904 NE 4th Avenue Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING 1. Soils report does not contain the analysis for potential for liquefaction as required by the Uniform Building Code, 1994 Edition. Addendum is required. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flows for each building are: Building A-4,500 GPM, Building B- 5,250 GPM, Building C- 3,500 GPM, Building D-3,250 GPM. The primary fire hydrant for each building is required to be within 150 feet of the building. Additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of each building at the rate of one hydrant for each 1,000 GPM of required fire flow or portion thereof. For example, Building B would require 6 hydrants; one within 150 feet and 5 additional hydrants within 300 feet. 2. The fire flow for Building B may not be available in the watermains serving this area. If not, the type of construction can be changed to lower the required fire flow. The preliminary fire flows were calculated on type V N construction. 3. Sprinkler systems are required in Buildings A and B. Building C and D may be required to be sprinklered if they are serving alcohol and have over 5,000 square feet of undivided floor area. Fire alarm systems will be based on the actual use of the building. 4. Separate plans and permits are required by the Fire Department for sprinkler, fire alarm system and hood suppression systems for restaurants. PLAN REVIEW Water Watermain extension, fire hydrants and DDCV assembly's (building, fire control systems will be required and must meet current fire codes/regulations. Water meters for domestic/irrigation will J ' be required sized to meet UPC requirements. Water system development charges (SDC)fees of$0.113 per square foot of gross site area will be required. Transportation Street improvements- NE 4th Street has existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and street lights. New access driveways to the site will be required and they must meet current City Codes/Standards. Sanitary Sewer The Site will require an extension of the sanitary sewer system to reach the proposed buildings within the site. Side sewer connections will be required and the cost is$80 per connection. Sanitary sewer(SDC)fees will be required at$0.078 per square foot of gross site area. Storm Drainage The site will require a storm drainage and temporary erosion control plan with design in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City. Detention/biofiltration will be required via a drainage swale, pond or wet vault. Surface water(SDC)fees will be required at $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface on the site. POLICE The highest number of commercial burglaries and thefts are from construction sites. Police recommend that the applicant fence in the lot with security fencing while the site is under construction, and use security lighting as well. Tools will need to have the model and serial numbers recorded,to aid in recovery if they are stolen. If a construction site trailer is used as an office, it will need heavy duty dead-bolt locks and auxiliary locks, plus metal bars over any windows,to help prevent entry by a thief. The buildings need heavy duty dead-bolt locks on all exterior doors, and security lighting around the building and in the parking lot. An alarm system is also highly recommended. AIRPORT Requires submittal of Notice of Proposed Construction for determination of lighting/marking requirements or determination of hazard or obstacle. Result of FAA review should be reviewed prior to issuance of Building Permit. PLANNING Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-034,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT NAME: Union Plaza Shopping Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3904 NE 4th Avenue MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $41,857.92. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $142,068.00 (1,894.24 trips x $75 = $142,068.00). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. 3. The Construction Mitigation Plan shall be revised to restrict haul hours to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The revised Construction Mitigation Plan shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of Construction Permits. r . CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-034,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT NAME: Union Plaza Shopping Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3904 NE 4th Avenue LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on May 06, 1997. Written comments and requests for reconsideration shall be forwarded to Development Services Division, Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington, on May 13, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval (SA). If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. PUBLICATION DATE: April 21, 1997 DATE OF DECISION: April 15, 1997 SIGNATURES: 793 '� '7/ Gregg�Zirym'erm , Adlrhinistrator DATE De arttm�nt'of annin /Buildin /Public Works P 9 9 l S Chastain;Administrator D Community Service Depa t 7Le0Alieeler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC ' • , LJ ' ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING • & POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION ' PROJECT NAME: UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER ' ' PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-034,SA,ECF Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices,consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,498 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. Location: 3904 NE 4th Ave. • AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. . IXXXI YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON MAY 06, 1997 OR APPEAL • THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,MAY 06. 1997. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS , WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR ' MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, ! WASHINGTON,ON MAY 13,1997 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL (SA). IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED,THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD i AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. 1 ' 1 _...i..x 'r'f j • • � I 1 `" e_ Z I NE 4...,STREET I . ylaanT P FOX eArt .LIL SsOPPLYG COI • I1 O• - °"•, i zC� — . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT . SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. • I, & th JG-c' dYt S' . hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document , were posted' me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described properly on . . . April to) ( 1. Signed: c PL d, �� STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . ) SS • COUNTY OF KING ) �`tt,, , I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that • 5 by �t signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and vcAti• . }r ctclor9he uses. and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ° ° > , t Dated: 14///i9/ • - Gt% . . Notary Pub in and o the State.of Washington -Notary (Print) MAR611-R - P -L�, My appointment expires: 6//'I . NOTARY.DOC ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-034,SA,ECF Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f..with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. Location: 3904 NE 4th Ave. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. XXX YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON MAY 06, 1997 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, MAY 06, 1997. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON MAY 13, 1997 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL (SA). IF,THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. • 11111 IfiR sitit's Elm j � R-IO era ;ftionai Fzic NE 4th 5T- T R 9 ■ U. Nu :, i F-I ■ VICINITY MAP FOR UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER oJ@0 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Pleaseincludet...... jectNU.MBERwhen`calling'f. ... e.C:;fle.identifi.cation:: I STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE April 15, 1997 Project Name Union Plaza Shopping Center Applicant Northwest Prompters File Number LUA-097-034, SA, ECF Project Manager Peter Rosen Project Description Proposal for a retail shopping center with offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total floor area of 80,496 square feet. The buildings face toward the interior parking area. Building A is oriented along a north/south axis on the west part of the site. Building A includes approximately 17,182 square feet of retail space on the first floor and 19,203 square feet of office area on the second floor. Building B is setback from NE 4th Avenue at the north end of the parking lot. Building B is proposed to include a 22,427 square foot grocery store and 5,018 square feet of retail area on the first floor and approximately 3,000 square feet of second story office space over the retail portion of the building. Buildings C and D are oriented north/south along the east property line, with a 20 foot wide corridor between the buildings. Building C is proposed as a 7,613 square foot restaurant and Building D includes approximately 9,053 square feet of retail space. The maximum building height would be 37 feet 10 inches above finish grade. Access to the site is proposed via two driveway entries off NE 4th Avenue. The applicant is proposing a total of 346 parking spaces. Project Location 3904 NE 4th Avenue Exist. Bldg. Area gsf NA Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf 80,496 s.f. Site Area 254,698 s.f., 5.85 acres Total Building Area gsf 80,4986 s.f. RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated. [- ti u .L;� • 4 ,if; if' . LAI711111 I _ Re. • 1 I R-10 FM_I R•IC R=� Z�.... E:-C > I 1 Z cs CJ CS' o I i--11 3 I 11 I NE 4th STREET HMI I I 1 •3 L__' I cs I. Project Location Map _ J. ERCRPT.DOC 1 E C ; J City of Renton PB/PWDepartment I ',mental Review Committee Staff Report • UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF REPORT OFAPRIL 15,1997 Page 2 of 6 B., RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 15 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 15 da A eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 15 day Appeal Period. followed by a 15 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $41,857.92. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $142,068.00 (1,894.24 trips x$75 = $142,068.00). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. 3. The Construction Mitigation Plan shall be revised to restrict haul hours to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The revised Construction Mitigation Plan shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of Construction Permits. ERCRPT.DOC ,City of Renton PB/PWDepartment 1 ',mental Review Committee Staff Report 71NIONPLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF REPORT OFAPRIL 15,1997 Page 3 of 6 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING 1. Soils report does not contain the analysis for potential for liquefaction as required by the Uniform Building Code, 1994 Edition. Addendum is required. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flows for each building are: Building A-4,500 GPM, Building B-5,250 GPM, Building C- 3,500 GPM, Building D-3,250 GPM. The primary fire hydrant for each building is required to be within 150 feet of the building. Additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of each building at the rate of one hydrant for each 1,000 GPM of required fire flow or portion thereof. For example, Building B would require 6 hydrants; one within 150 feet and 5 additional hydrants within 300 feet. 2. The fire flow for Building B may not be available in the watermains serving this area. If not,the type of construction can be changed to lower the required fire flow. The preliminary fire flows were calculated on type V N construction. 3. Sprinkler systems are required in Buildings A and B. Building C and D may be required to be sprinklered if they are serving alcohol and have over 5,000 square feet of undivided floor area. Fire alarm systems will be based on the actual use of the building. 4. Separate plans and permits are required by the Fire Department for sprinkler, fire alarm system and hood suppression systems for restaurants. PLAN REVIEW Water Watermain extension, fire hydrants and DDCV assembly's (building, fire control systems will be required and must meet current fire codes/regulations. Water meters for domestic/irrigation will be required sized to meet UPC requirements. Water system development charges (SDC) fees of$0.113 per square foot of gross site area will be required. Transportation Street improvements- NE 4th Street has existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and street lights. New access driveways to the site will be required and they must meet current City Codes/Standards. Sanitary Sewer The Site will require an extension of the sanitary sewer system to reach the proposed buildings within the site. Side sewer connections will be required and the cost is$80 per connection. Sanitary sewer(SDC) fees will be required at $0.078 per square foot of gross site area. Storm Drainage The site will require a storm drainage and temporary erosion control plan with design in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City. Detention/biofiltration will be required via a drainage swale, pond or wet vault. Surface water(SDC) fees will be required at$0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface on the site. POLICE The highest number of commercial burglaries and thefts are from construction sites. Police recommend that the applicant fence in the lot with security fencing while the site is under construction, and use security lighting as well. Tools will need to have the model and serial numbers recorded, to aid in recovery if they are stolen. If a construction site trailer is used as an office, it will need heavy duty dead-bolt locks and auxiliary locks, plus metal bars over any windows,to help prevent entry by a thief. The buildings need heavy duty dead-bolt locks on all exterior doors, and security lighting around the building and in the parking lot. An alarm system is also highly recommended. ERCRPT.DOC •City of Rbaton PB/PW Department l, onmental Review Committee Staff Report UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF REPORT OFAPRIL 15,1997 Page 4 of 6 AIRPORT Requires submittal of Notice of Proposed Construction for determination of lighting/marking requirements or determination of hazard or obstacle. Result of FAA review should be reviewed prior to issuance of Building Permit. PLANNING Gelrbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and ' environmental regulations. Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? 1. Earth Impacts: The site consists of gentle slopes ranging between 6%to 15%. The applicant proposes to grade the front portion of the site along NE 4th Street and to use the cut material to fill the man-made gully at the rear of the site. The,applicant has not indicated that amount of soil material that would be graded for the proposal or if additional fill or cut material would be imported/exported to the site. The site is currently wooded and it would be cleared of all trees for the shopping center development. Erosion could occur during the construction phase of the project. Potential erosion impacts would be mitigated by City Codes which require the applicant to provide a Construction Mitigation Plan and require a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) prior to issuance of Construction Permits. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: NA 2) I Air Impacts Impacts to air quality can be anticipated during construction and after occupancy of the proposed project. Impacts during construction would include increased levels of airborne particulates (especially dust) from disturbance of exposed soils. Construction impacts would be short term in nature and would be mitigated through best management practices of the required TESCP and with the Construction Mitigation Plan. Emissions from construction equipment exhaust would have a minor impact on local air quality. Exhaust from construction vehicles is regulated by State and City Codes. After construction the impacts would be associated primarily with vehicle exhaust from,customer and employee traffic. Vehicle emissions are regulated by the State of Washington. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA 3) Water Impact' The project site is located at the crest of two drainage basins. No off-site drainage enters the site. There are no surface water bodies or wetlands that the applicant has identified on the site. The proposal would result in impervious surface coverage of approximately 85% of the site area. The proposed storm drainage system would utilize an underground pipe detention system at both the north and south ends of the site. These pipes are designed to restrict flows to the existing runoff rates, and designed for the standard ERCRFT.DOC -City of Renton PB/PWDepartment 1'. mmental Review Committee Staff Report UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF REPORT OFAPRIL 15,1997 Page 5 of 6 2/10/100-year design storm as required by the 1990 King County Surface Water Manual. Water quality for the project would be provided by dead storage and sediment storage in the bottom of the detention pipes. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA 4) Fire Protection Impacts The proposal would add new construction to the City which would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee applies to all new construction. The required mitigation fee is based on a rate of!$0.52 per square foot of new construction. For the proposed development the fee is tentatively estimated at $41,857.92 (80,496 square feet X $0.52 = $41,857.92). The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that Building Permits are issued. Mitigation Measures The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $41,857.92. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting Ordinance, SEPA Ordinance. 5) Transportation Impacts Access to the project is proposed via two driveways off NE 4th Street. These driveway cuts are separated by approximately 165 feet. The proposal would result in an increase in traffic trips and therefore would be subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is calculated to be $75 per each average daily trip attributable to the project. City staff has estimated that the project would generate a total of 1,894.24 new average daily trips. Therefore, the Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at$142,068.00 (1,894.24 trips x$75 = $142,068.00). The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan which describes the hauling and transportation routes to the site and states that construction would be performed between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Construction-related truck traffic could impact traffic flows if occurring during AM or PM peak traffic flows. This truck traffic should be limited to off-peak hours. Mitigation Measures The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip;associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at$142,068.00 (1,894.24 trips x$75= $142,068.00). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. The Construction Mitigation Plan shall be revised to restrict haul hours to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The revised Construction Mitigation Plan shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of Construction Permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance, Transportation Mitigation Fee Ordinance 6) Land and Shoreline Use Impacts The subject site is zoned Center Suburban (CS) and the proposed uses are permitted in the CS zoning designation. The proposal is consistent with adopted zoning and the Comprehensive Plan. There are no land use impacts anticipated to result with the proposal. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment I 'mental Review Committee Staff Report UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF REPORT OFAPRIL 15,1997 Page 6 of 6 E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report.. ERCRPT.DOC ` E 's ig iiii ::::::::<:::::: : :: <> ...................... .....................................................................................:.....:.:. ............. TO: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Sa Chastain, Community Services Administrator 1 Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jim Hanson & Mike Kattermann - <M:e„etEn <:Date.::>:::::»>:::»::Tue .............................................................................................. . iiiiiiiiiiinimiiiiiiiiiiimmummisom :S�:%i<`:;'ai!''+��:::A`M.i�:::::: :::�::F :i::2i::::?;: ':::::::::: :::::::::::: :� ::::::::;::::::::::: ,^.::::::::::�::::::'::::::::':::: :: : ::is�?:�:::::::;:::::::;'::::"::::::::'::`:`:: :: ::::�:::i:r:: :::::::::::::::::: :i 2?f:�:� i:.::;;.;::.4::isi:::t:: :i:i:::2 i:?:;:iiimi:::;ii.... :; ..:::::...:..:..:.:.:<:•xa;.;.r:.r:•.:;,.:;;::.>:.:::: .':;:.;.y!;::::..:.:y::::£:::::::::::i:: :ri:::'::::h::::::::::::2::::::::::::2 ::r ::5`r':'t:i:::?t ::'':is':':''::::::':::a::::::::::::::::::::::: :::;:;:; :�;::::?::i:i 5 t . •.: :: ... •::::i::::g:::.::::::. . : • : •:::::•::::::: :i r• ::.�::::•: ::::;:::.:::�: :::::u a . .�:::.T:Ir..tt.:l=aor...... f r�. . :... .a ...........::.::::::::::::.:::.:::::. .. : ::::: :::::::: ::::: ::...:::.:: .: :::..:�:::::::::.:Locate.. r>E�...:::.::.::.::.:.:::<..............ta.............�..........C+�rt.�:...n�a �.:::m ::............................................................................. ................ ................. ......... Agenda listed below. ' I Union Plaza Shopping Center(new) (Rosen) LUA-97-034,SA,ECF ' Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking - spaces. Accesswould be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. Location: 3904'NE 4th Street. . - 1 • Nextel Communication Facility on NE 12th (new) (Powell) . LUA-97-031,ECF,ACU,V • The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review (ECF), Administrative Conditional Use (CU) Permit and a height Variance (V) in order to construct a 138 foot, 6 inch monopole tower in a multi-family residential zone. The project site is located in APA Zone 2. Location: 4715 NE 12th Street. I I .. Child.& Adult Day Care Zoning & Parking Code (new) .. _ . ..,. . .. .. . (Grueter) . LUA-97-037,ECF • Environmental Review for proposed amendments to the Center, Commercial and Industrial Zones. The,proposed amendments address both child and adult day care zoning and parking code amendments. Minor amendments are needed to provide consistency in how child day care uses are allowed in center and commercial zones. The primary child care amendment would be to allow child day care centers in the Center Neighborhood (CN) zone as a primary' permitted use,.consistent with allowances in other Center zones. Similar to child day care, adult day care (also known as adult day health) allows for the temporary care of adults who require some assistance or supervision. Adult day care/health typically provides daily supervision, social activities, and health services for elderly or disabled persons. Proposed code amendments would allow adult day care/health uses only in center, commercial, and industrial zones at this''time. Adult day care/health uses would be required to comply with similar parking requirements as child day care uses. I • Streamlining SEPA Process (Discussion) (Huerter) cc: . J.Covington,Executive Assistant to the Mayor - - • - •• AGENDA.DOC L.Warren,City Attorney (R) F.Kaufman_,Hearing Examiner . S.Carlson,Economic Development Director•{R) ' - • ' J.Gray,Fire Prevention .- A.Larson,Fire • (R) _ • 1 it • Frei, Architecture•Engineering•Value Engineering•Construction Management 701 Dexter Avenue North 1301 Seattle,Washington 98109 tel: (2D6)2854300 DEVELOPMENT pLa,ill�indG Fax: (206)285-4311 CITY OF r,„T OLYMPIE &molt oacmtl.com r. A_SOCIATES . ' .;-„�; . cl) MPANY r��d April 9, 1997 RECEIVED Peter Rosen Project Manager City of Renton Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,Washington 98055 Re:Union Plaza Shopping Center Site Plan Approval LUA97-O34,SA,BCF 3904 NE 4th Street Renton,Washington Dear Peter, Thank you for promptly returning my call inquiring as to whether or not any additional information would be required for our submittal for Site Plan Approval for this project.Per your request for clarifications on parking,building use,and setbacks,I have revised our site plan drawing to show the correct building use and parking analysis. With regard to the setbacks at the front property line,existing adjacent site conditions and fire department requirements made us realize that Building"A"and Building"D"should be located farther away from the property line(at the street)than the distance that the City of Renton Zoning Regulations requires. Building"D"is set back a distance of approximately 96'-0"from the property line,while Building"A"is set back approximately 86'-10"from the front property line.We preferred to locate Buildin "D"closer to the front properly line,however we were prevented from doing this because of the close proximity of a retail building(on the adjacent site to the east) to the property line.The adjacent property to the east slopes toward our site and the existing retail building on that site is located extremely close(1 to 2 feet away)from the shared property line.Had we located Building"D"closer to the front property line,we would have risked undermining the existing adjacent buildings foundation and we would have been required to create a very largo retaining wall at this area. We felt that by locating Building"D"in its it present location,we would eliminate the undermining danger and this would reduce the visual impact that a large retaining wall would have on the street view of our property.It is my understanding that the reason 'for the City of Renton's setback requirement is to help create a more pedestrian"friendly"and visually appealing streetscape.To meet this goal,we have located landscape islands all along the front edge of our parking lot,both at the street(as required)and at the front edge of our main parking field In addition,we will add sidewalks and landscaped areas at the front of our property at both Building"A"and Buis "D"to create a more visually appealing and easier site access for pedestrians to our buildings. At Building."A",we located our building in its present location to meet the City of Renton Fire Department's requirement for fire truck access to all sides of this building.In order to"soften"the visual impact that a parking lot would create at this area,we have located landscaping peninsula's at each end of the parking area immediately south of Building"A",In addition,our landscape architect has place an 18" high berm(with planting)at the landscaped area adjacent to the front property line.This planting material on this berm is identified on the landscaping legend as 12 to 14 feet high red maple tress and ` 4� • Qit•A G .•ON Wd20:2 2.661.6 'Ztdti 2 feet high laurel.We feel that this landscaping will create a visually appealing edge I screen to the parking lot area which was created by the Fire Department's requirement for access to all sidcs of Building"A". In talking with you earlier,you mentioned that our Site Plan Approval would be viewed more favorably by members of the Environmental Review Committee if we were to improve pedestrian access to the buildings on the site.Enclosed is a copy of the partial plan that shows the new sidewalks and planting areas that have been added per your suggestion.I have also eliminated a parking space in front of Building"C"and Building"D"and have added an access walkway from the parking lot to the central part of each building,I have also enclosed a partial plan which shows this revision.I have included a revised Project Data chart which shows the correct number of parking spaces and the parking ratios which were used in calculating the required number of spaces.The original Project Data did not include the 3,000 square feet Office area at the upper level of Building"B"and this revised Project Data Chart correctly shows this revision. Peter,I hope that this letter communicates our intentions for varying from the setback requirements,as well as our efforts to create the visually appealing streetscape that the City of Renton desires for property in this building zone.Please contact me if you need revised Site Plans which show all of the revisions mentioned above. If I can be of any further assistance,please feel free to contact me, Thank you very much. Best.' gards, /elf C. J.Colson AIA CJC/tbm • race•ni i W-I?R:? IF,F,t.F, •NHd . . . ‘ ... .-:-..-:-.----.-:•./I Ci _.r---- .-."•-I.----------- \ :.:....:-..;:-..:-.:--...: s) .............. ................... , ... 1 . \4.6,4.' 4..'••••it4gel:,h 111111 ' tSt.tibikN\ . 1 , ., .\., • -.: .% ,..,,, 1,,„\s .\\.,• ,.. : :-./ , . •: '....\\. ,,,.\,\.„,... ....\\, .....,,> • ..,..,,..\:::\s‘... .* ...\....,. .....,,,, II ;\ \'.;..",5\ • ' ''x•N : , -:.\ -,,, ,...,- ,,.-,s, ;\,., -4' ---..-,1 COMPACT - •';\ e,l' '.< "4"•;1:: \\\• *.".."." ' COMPACT • "F la ' I 1 . \.\ \ , \ . , „•.„ \\ ..- , _1 COMPACT ,„*.\..,„ \ \ ....\. • . -.....-/„. - kg)1 1 •„\\\"•., `.,"'•\‘`. \\ •,.. 1, E-4_ 1—.4 •II N . NNINN N\ N .s•\:\ %-• ./ 1—: — NNN\ N NN ( , . COMPACT \\., \. .. \\., ` • • • • N\ \- \ •-`,\`.\--`.\s- \'s ss .\ s v-1▪,z1 Li , comeAcT ,:\ .s. :\..••..:\.\. -\\:\-\:\ \::-:: .----./.,- ‘:•'.\\ .,'.'•., '.- .., ::57-. •D ........... ........... 1 . \ Ns,\., . „\ ..:..,/ = . I *••••.,,,,N\ ••• NN\N‘N, \\\\;:,,•• ••:,./ Cei I , * * s, \.\\\\s,\\*\\\NN N \‘.` -•••,,; C•4 IS) W \ ‘NN. \'•\ .:-......V; toU •, \.\\,‘ \\\•,..\\.k.\::.\\ \\.„ .\s.\ .....ey „NJ!— : •: \ .W‘.\\N,N \\ , :•"::o ,,,..1 H ..•\‘',\s,...\\...„,.:::,,:\.N.7.\ \7..'.\\\: ::::-.2:// . ib• (. , — • I I •,,•, • , \ \ • ‘sss• \ •\\ \ ‘‘.‘" H.://\\•„\\N\ \ \\\ \22\ ..., II \:...\\\ „ \•„.. \ •N \\•,, N., ......v . . ...N•\•'Ns'\ss's••\'`• \• •\s' "'. 7: ,/, ,-.:\\"\\N;\ •.\\\\ • ..-.•"., . - .\• •-\\:', \ '\s •s•s• .\\\ '....-;/. e I AR5 31 GABR \\ . \N .\\ ---•-r , erx201e1x201 0 iXLIL/ I I n,At t1 N.\\\•. \.. \•'s \ \ - .-- • ...J ,:s..\\N, \\\,\\\\ •:,•• ,:: • .‘S- • \•\N ":::-.-1 '••.\ \\ •,\,s•\\ N. N\‘-‘\ •-• /. \ , \ I COMPACT • • • ,.. • • .\ .. / L . IIIM • ' r •Rito to s:' -. • s, .....-.../ COMPACT 11 \\\\C.% ."\"\ 'r. s\\\ \ :.:1/4 I % .'s • 1141 \ :::;/ .....-::::::-. .........:: > •\: •\\• . • •\ .` -•-,/ •::::::::----'=::::::: COMPACT \ ss. •\ N. •\\ — / Za 11 ' • • . . .9 i:,.:kx ---:-.e. -:-_- -1 I comp AcT 4 .\\„ •• .N . s; \\ \N\ \\\ ,:.-.▪-fp .161 " 4iA.\ I\ I . COMPACT L ' • • • . . •• -▪- i .' '---" COMPAT , C O• '\, %\s,..`n..,, \\,„' .,, ,,•-:.-5):•:-.../;" 1 ,.. \\\\ k\-•:`, -\\\:\ ', :::/ COMPACT \•\\\• \•\ '..4-%":;/, t '' . „ ",,\\•,., ‘\.\•,\.,\ ,,s,\• •.'• . . . I : :• :•,>''',\ ••. <..,\ NN\. 43•••.••A/1 •.\\s,..s'Ns\sss'‘N"\•\\N.'s:\\\\\.‘ ::: ,4 _Li ,• s\''‘ e\s \>eAss ' J'i•il•:, NsNs 1.4:-:---1'? zfr 4 2 4' 01' 0 .9 -0 - .-1 ,s>.\\\ Ndp-w\•-.ws , .-,-_-.1., 1 I II s•ss\:•N' s\ •W \s\".'' . 7:::::r: r-- , i %‘\•• :.:‘ \ \\''‘\\•••,,s .\•. .. ‘ Ss i —. ------, . . ::::::::::-_---_-:-:•-•:1 - D I ,.) .......................! _ " -—--—•"" ...... Ic4 .........::::::::•:•: : •:::::::::: -•••••1!,..t ___ __ ,,c--_J MCC'•rm.1 Wd20:2 2.66T"6 'Hdbi . .. \ v m m • m 0 I I. ..411J \��\'�..�,\` I cures Gt C;Ati a.� !; ill" ' \�\ ��\ 24-0 ate'=.. 24-0" 4e -ro" 24 -m'�' 'Z4'-0'%! \'\:'' �'\ ;/ /it -.kNW4.fi I" -'- P .- :: - �. I ..."::":.:‘ Ii I'` ;. E::::I:i.:•:.:1.:::.:::.::::e:1;:::::i:::i.::.:1 CARS Vh:4::x:::.0./01 k', N 6 ARP 6�GARS I '� s - 9 0 n S CARS 9 S'x20' 6-6" x 16'r ry CARS �4�'' ,i „ _AL .,,,•••-- \ \i , ice.///� /�:,',//4..,,,./ '�'„,_- ' its" 7 ! : //, w ' ___ - NOLE _ - I ' — �'`-----NEUJ S° SELLER LINE --- \ _ — ____ )RM SYSTEM N.E. 4TH AVE. A . E0 NEW B" SEL R LINE ` EXISTING 12" WATER LINE CL m -0' WIDE SIDEWALK ~— N -0' PLANTING STRIP • m m Cri • CITY OF RENTON ZONING CLASSIFICATION CS TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE SITE: 254,698 SF. TOTAL S L1ARE FOOTAGE OF THIS= BUILDINGS RETAIL SPACE BUILDING "A" 11,182 SF. BUILDING "5" 5,018 5F. RETAIL TOTAL 22200 S.F. OFFICE SPACE BUILDING "A" 9,916 SF. BUILD1NG "a" 3,000 SF. OFFICE TOTAL 12,916 SF. MINFANT SPACE BUILDING "A" 3,281 S.P. BUILDING "C" 1,513 Si:. BUILDING "D" 9,053 SF. RESTAURANT TOTAL 25,953 5F. GROCER' SPACE BUILDING "B" 22,421 S.F. PROJECT TOTAL 83,496 S.F. TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF3LDG.FOOTPRINTS: 61293 SF_ PERCENTAGE OF LOT COVERAGE: 24% PAmCINCs ANALYSIS LuHtai CiFFIcE AND RESTAURANT SPACE ARE INCLUDED WITHIN A SHOPPING CENTER THE PARKIN REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE THAT FOR A 5HOPPNG CENTER OUR PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE EASED UPON 5ETIIEE?1 A AND is SPACES PER THOUSAND SGlUARE FEET OF SPACE. • 83,496 SF. DIVIDED BY 1000 = 83.496 83.496 TIMES 4 SPACES PER THOUSAND = 334 SPACES REQ. FULL SIZE SPACES PROVIDED 312 (9'-0" x 20'-0") COMPACT SIZE SPACES PROVIDED 23 (8'-6" x l6'-0") 1-1ANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SPACES 1 (PER W.A.C. 5120 STANDARDS) PARKING SPACE TOTAL 342 (4.1 SPACES PER 1000 SF.) SQUARE FOOTAGE OF INTERIOR LOT LANDSCAPING 1,112 SF. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ALL OTHER LANDSCAPING 30981 SF. ALLOWABLE EIUILDING I-(EIGHT 50'-0" PROPOSED BUILDING 44EIGHT 36'-0" (REQUIRED SETBACKS 15 A FRONT 15' w 5IDE5 15' * REAR PROPOSED SETBACKS 85' s FRONT 15' Q 5IDE5 35' s REAR czc•.-1 AcP•nil Wd70:2 L66T'6 'LOU City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Transportation Comments Due: 4/3/97 Application No.: LUA 97-034, SA,ECF Date Circulated: 3/20/97 Applicant: Northwest Prompters Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Union Plaza Shopping Center Work Order No: 78194 Location: 3904 NE 4th Street Site Area: 254,698 s.f. (5.85 ac) Building Area(gross): 80,496 s.f. A. Environmental Impact(e.g. Non-Code) Comments B. Policy-Related Comments C. Code-Related Comments Street improvements (NE 4th Street) has existing curbs, gutters, sidewalk, street paving and street lights. New access driveways to the site will be required and they must meet current City Codes/Standards. A study will be required to provide trip generation,AM/PM peak traffic volumes and splits to and from the site. A traffic mitigation fee of$75 per daily trip will be required. ece,44,./j/q.47--- —/— 7 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date grnfldr 2- y3 ,y�Y O . .. , . ...,..4., . . .... :... .. .. .. yp,_ 7X. 1. T IZ .4 'a ' .K •# � .' ..,-.�v.is'y'' <•x -. es;'. ,7i-e!!-"`tea' .:.. � .�PQ :. � d "' ap . . .A .RT t.C}�V . Project Name ()mom P Iazq SLr0 p f 1, Cc ki-fi v i PliojectAddress 3g01-1 NE qt'i 5-t✓eet • Contact Person Ccv.I Colsovl oltim c Assouufrr Co . Address 701 De4f<✓ 7itie IV ) 41 30I c /t g8I0y Phone Number 2 8 5 - 4 300 Permit Number L.U A - c(1 - O 3L} Project Description Refai 15.tio,fitt. CCy;fcv - y 13106 s 3146 pky sPuces 22,20 0 cz,gl 4 25,R53 F tcn I - 5.-1. 0-f{,ce - �3 s. f'- Re 5 Ta a v4,4 t - J4j3 s.I. )95,496 0-44 GvDcev - 22.) y2?. s:f. Tofu 1 - Q -4"r S-f . Land.Use Type: , Method_of Calculation: ❑ Residential TE Trip Generation Manual OT Retail 0 Traffic Study GI/Non-retail 0 Other Calculation: S-ee q-ttAcile,( clicet lRe.v1,44 4J,9/e7 `3R y.Z 4 u.eu> Ce4 1 1 /Cv lI 5 2 0 .Z. c ►i.w t..,P S 0 1.75 fir" c v'P 7 5 �` -E�,P . i- 063 . OD A),e ) L Aa/(7 Transportation Mitigation Fee: .1 0- 153;217.Z 5 Calculated by: N6j4(1474 Date: 047 Account Number: Date's of Payment . 1 • Transportation Mitigation Fee Calculation Union Plaza Shopping Center Average Daily Net New ITE Code Trips per Primary Trips Sq. Ft. Average Daily 1,000 sq.ft. (%) Proposed Trips Retail 820 75.62 trips 25% 22,200 sq.ft. 419.69 trips Office 710 23.65 trips 100% 12,916 sq.ft. 305.46 trips Restaurant 831 81.61 trips 29% 25,953 sq.ft. 614.23 trips Grocery 850 125.48 trips 25% 22,427 sq.ft. 703.53 trips TOTAL 2042.91 trips * Retail figures (average daily trip rate) based on Shopping Center, using curve equation from page 1234 based on total size of center(all uses) * Office trip rates from Table 4,page 942 (using extrapolation). * Restaurant trip rates based on assumption as Quality Restaurant (page 1249 -by equation), which is lowest trip generator for restaurant designations. * Grocery trip rates based on estimated value for weekday daily trips, based on ratios established between peak rates and daily rates on weekends. Manual only lists peak hour values for weekdays. Same trip generation values used for Safeway store on NE 4th St. * Assumptions for primary trips for various uses (thereby discounting pass-by and diverted trips), are based on values used for Safeway project, derived from information provided in the ITE Manual. Based on mitigation fee of$75 per net new average daily trip: ($75)X(2042.91 daily trips)= $153,218.25 • UNPLZ-2.DOC\ • • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works • ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: tbitcc, COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-034,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 3/20/97 APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen 194611JECT TITLE: Union Plaza Shopping Center WORK ORDER NO: 78194 LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 254,698 s.f. (5,85 ac) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 80,496 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 • s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary • Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air' Aesthetics Water LightGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use • Utilities Animals Transportation / Environmental Health Public Services �Vl Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet [- L& pDtvi CALLS estcnacw annU ctlk1 , IXL d 07-1 L'vu_ Y6. ' i OJLQ&-' This area of Renton reports a high number of commercial burglary, robberies and thefts from vehicle types of reports. To help prevent these kinds of crimes , the businesses will all need solid-core exterior doors. Back doors will need peeop-holes for employee safety, to aid in the observation of the back alley-ways. Security lighting will need to be in place around the exteriors of all the buildings , especially in the back sides. Access to the hark of the B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS buildings should be limited- preferably with security fencing. After the businesses have closed this area could become dangerous due to the lack of natural surveillance by business merchants. This area of Renton also reports .a high number.of drug-related activity incidents , such as drug sales in parking lots. Recommend that the landscaping that covers the exterior property line of the property be thinned out and replaced with chain-link fencing instead Or in addition to the landscaping. Because of the lack of visibility around and behind the businesses , -criminals could be tempted to congregate in these areas for drug related crimes or to attempt to break into the businsses via the back doors . By eliminated the excess land- C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • scaping and providing chain-link• fencing,. visibility will be greatly improved - thus allowing other merchants or customers to keep an eye on the property. Each back door to each. business will need auxiliary locking devices in addition to heavy-duty dead-bolt locks (such as a latch guard and pry-resistant cylinder around the lock) . Each business needs a security alarm system. Security lighting will need to be maintained i.n the parking areas, as well as surrounding each' building. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ldh 261-e -c77E; - 9 Sign�tfire of Director o Aut orized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC ' 1 • I RENTON rinc FIRE: :, F�l��iTlO 'n IREAU City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works MAR 2 0 1997 ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW S , -F� ET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Flre.... VireuejAhavl COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-034,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 3/20/97 APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen gJECT TITLE: Union Plaza Shopping Center WORK ORDER NO: 78194 LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 254,698 s.f. (5,85 ac) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 80,496 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air ! Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet A/o Raj L`++-�0RciS li �1 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS it) • . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS & — Lel . o We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas.in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad.tional information is need v,properly assess this proposal. awts 61" 3/a//g • Si. - .re of Director or Authorized Repres7/tative Date DE rP.DOC Rev.10193 CITY OF RENTON ,� o� FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: March 21, 1997 TO: Peter Rosen, Planner // FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal `! SUBJECT: Union Plaza Shopping Center, 3904 NE 4th St. Fire Department Comments: 1.The preliminary fire flows for each building are ; Building A- 4500 GPM, Building B- 5250 GPM, Building C- 3500 GPM, Building D- 3250 GPM. The primary fire hydrant for each building is required to be within 150 feet of the building. Additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of each building at the rate of one hydrant for each 1000 GPM of required fire flow or portion thereof. Example, Building B would require 6 hydrants, one within 150 and 5 additional hydrants within 300 feet. 2. The fire flow for Building B may not be available in the watermains serving this area..If not, the type of construction can be changed to lower • the required fire flow. The preliminary fire flows were calculated on type V N construction. 3. Sprinkler systems are required in building A and B. Buildings C and D may be required the be sprinkled if they are serving alcohol and have over 5,000 square feet of undivided floor area. Fire alarm systems will be based on the actual use of the buildings. 4. Separate plans and permits are required by the Fire Department for sprinkler, fire alarm system and hood suppression systems for the restaurants. 5. The required fire mitigation fees based on $.52 a square foot are: Building A- $18,922.22 Building B- $15,854.80 Building C- $3,961.88 Building D- $4,707.56 Please feel free to contact this office if you have any questions City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Plan Review-Water Comments Due: 4/3/97 Application No.: LUA 97-034, SA, ECF Date Circulated: 3/20/97 Applicant: Northwest Prompters _ Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Union Plaza Shopping Center Work Order No: 78194 Location: 3904 NE 4th Street Site Area: 254,698 s.f. (5.85 ac) Building Area(gross): 80,496 s.f. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments B. Policy-Related Comments C. Code-Related Comments Water Main extension, fire hydrants and DDCV assembly's (building fire control systems will be required and must meet current fire codes/regulations. Water meters for domestic/irrigation will be required sized to meet UPC requirements. Water system development charges (SDC)fees of$0.113 per square foot of gross site area will be required. Signature of Director or Aut o Representative Date g grnfldr City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Surface Waste Water Comments Due: 4/3/97 Application No.: LUA 97-034, SA, ECF Date Circulated: 3/20/97 Applicant: Northwest Prompters Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Union Plaza Shopping Center Work Order No: 78194 Location: 3904 NE 4th Street Site Area: 254,698 s.f. (5.85 ac) Building Area(gross): 80,496 s.f. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments B. Policy-Related Comments C. Code-Related Comments The Site will require an extension of the sanitary sewer system to reach the proposed buildings within the site. Side sewer connections will be required and the cost is $80 per connection. Sanitary sewer (SDC) fees will be required at $0.078 per square foot of gross site area. The site will require a storm drainage and temporary erosion control plan with design in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City. Detention/biofiltration will be required via a drainage swale, pond or wet vault. Surface water (SDC) fees will be required at $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface on the site. 9 �� 7 Signature of Director orAuthorized Representative Date gmfldr • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works • ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pe COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-034,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 3/20/97 APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen REJECT TITLE: Union Plaza Shopping Center WORK ORDER NO: 78194 LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street • SITE AREA: 254,698 s.f. (5,85 ac) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 80,496 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS • Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use • Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet c /26 e 7,& B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Gl/LC�f'1sUcitay,4 • • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 3�01/9 7 Sig ure of Director or Authorized Represen ative Dafe DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City... ..enton Department of Planning/Building/P----- Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Atrro r COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-034,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 3/20/97 APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen w JECT TITLE: Union Plaza Shopping Center WORK ORDER NO: 78194 LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 254,698 s.f. (5,85 ac) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 80,496 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth f Housing ✓ Air V Aesthetics V Water V. Light/Glare ✓ Plants V Recreation V Land/Shoreline Use V Utilities ✓ Animals V- Transportation V Environmental Health V Public Services V Energy/ V. Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet / 14,000 Feet 62 D Lek/EL .T z t T E « 4ba' IASL ( A4aCt1B V1-16. c..tivet.), aRDCKD 4. acoa 1.KacED 27gf 4 L C© L(CAL sURFActe. Sac/xi-tom .5o2P..OuRD A KailoP., t B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS tF =010,,, $LDS Pe€MtT Et1-0,8451.a5 051g i s CoKPAttSt.1. WIN 0PiPAcu M C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS V .QuLUZ I O8l4L1TAL. OJ- WMg et' P21P D cet'tVTPUc.c tt14 T02. '�gTP04114aL1 pc. -u.cbrt«Ec/ VAD.W.11/41c Woa4.15 �D�w.�tuE9 a lz��Q. �o aK LK Mt al CF. ��p At1c� �j �u.� ' a's 4.T oF- 'FM 2.BU i EU) � 40 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where :••itional informa •+is needed to properly assess this proposal. 14 Signatu f Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.• Rev.10/93 --:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:---:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:--- a a a 11.1 : 1 i . • ...di pre\i, t A , -No , --:::-.::::::KEEEEEEEEEE;i4337K:E=E:E:KE:KE:::::::::::::---::_:_-_ -.i --;:-=----::::E::::-----::-:-S---ff:Yfff::-/"--' ..,1,.i 'I I-. - • • .r7. , brio �l� ====_=====_==========__==- --=___=======_=_====_===_===_==__= y_ ,� A /,,_c_h_(..6 i ,__J___ " \,_ ■�A I11 =====_=K =====-- ==_===_===_=====-========-= ======_- tee t - =_====--_ =_===_ _=_=_ ====_=__=="=__===�=_===- ==_=='= - : �_- : c ,„„ in. U . ,.., „, G ____ ___ _ __A= -_=1=_ -_ � 1� - / 'Armen 1-04, al 1 /1-;:;:) -1---j-. 21/1:11 Li na &NE:3:7-f-g-rEg:::::-::::::::::- ::::::::::::24::::3-K:E:E:E:E:3:::E:::::33::::::::::::133:2:::::::::::2"t::::::::.- Nal . lith prim 7.,w____ . VT —.*: NT—CO 9111 q r --11.--:-E-:7::::'.:E=E:E-::,-E:E::---_-:1-E:E7.E.:E:=-=t12,ff=33321..d.:EE:E:Ht3E:E=3E-E-H--E-]-:::::-.---:-E-E---LE-:::-E-:-E- pa . VI n...1.1--,,,,-1611.0 It -. ,.....,y--;;;Eilli wing -,^ . 1 .... --1 i TO ,..,-:.'. v„,.1,,, . -.* ' \ ItIrnM- ',,*--.4,‘-r.r-a-__. ENoli v_...., c5-, _____________-_,,,,,..,______„_,_:_,__- __- _,_,_:____________________ _________::::::::::: , . ff,4111,11410. .? pi nal, Earn,_ ;TA qi 1. , I I L 1,10L___2 0 ce4..\\y,--- .., -------------:-:---:-:-:-:-:-:-:::::::-:------:-H-H--- ----------:-:-:-:--i ,k 1 1 4 ' I I Fill ;T.- - _,. .1:14. 7.-Iii:s-..---... IV 1 'T --- 1 I I ;i Lti 11(1)k'\SN\/ ' 470 i >,\,' CI IC P.041 bk.----:::-.-::::::Elt:EE:::::::::::E.7:31E-_:E::::::E::E::E::-:::::::::-:::::::3:::::3-EE::::::_::K--- m 111E ri I '. . 1 - ri I 2-r' lkilliel'irrgril c" " I ZVI Mil lz . L l I -� ‘`. 121 1,77 el \vaims .c. ....• ® - -- • ;- �.u�e ® �� is t� / .• \" ft-.:--W&sitwii .%. . —L3 --4, . —n--,.... \O a.R � �:11��::_��®: t w I t meets•.• �� ... 43iim n t v p ._ i of®3 1 /�r1 -kilo7 � '"' I kw!k(t .' ��@IL7®npg,2 vtii,f.1,...10 151,t 2 _ /41fitIO '" les L--,k E la , 1 4 kr\-4 . ��® �_ m Ali:,:,. , ,� �� 1 Pj113111"11P! KM i / R :2; t 1 =`°Mlles II �� • I1: Til • Ill a-, EP Pliglir :,..�1 �® /i ! 11 P s a f-1 till t'' -n", 111W1111101meta•,MI r ph IP, gi ir i V R-1 " 4117 \C".•• -wr, fith.---- .____ 1 1 ;MN=t-,411r* -- /3 R1 r,-, ,,,iih„\,.,.,\'.'..'......'. .... 11 ��®r ram' {l�/lli.1 .-.ic.. 1.i t .. . erl 33 tl1i i3i.*lFer r A7F-r,.. �,'fi0 iift•E i.t-i,,__—-,...4i . ... •-• "Z.. `.L. ". 4",74*.'"11 --'. l• ' 1-.1'07,.' .. ,,1ii1! .°\_ i1gI C 61 esi ' :>Jt' ;i' a wv, ,y i : S :I1 • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works • ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:CiyAsetimaim Sakilan COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-034,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 3/20/97 r'•lTY OF RENTON APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen FRgiJECT TITLE: Union Plaza Shopping Center WORK ORDER NO: 78194 MAR 2 n 1997 • LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street yam,,.`..-.: v: _.4-k,ioi1" N SITE AREA: 254,698 s.f. (5,85 ac) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 80,496 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. • A. !ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information • Impacts Impacts Necessa Impacts Impacts Necessary I Earth Housing Air I Aesthetics Water Light/Glare _ Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use • Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural . Natural Resources Preservation • Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 1 14,000 Feet I B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 5 O r r f R1T Obe5 hb O-r a t T A !t 11.4, '1)tA) fkL`f 5t5 coR. PbX1Olitit/ i' k Li O PR (bII1 A) - . 1 PIS D.0 tk�.0 f� TEL IR1. 0k111/1 .86lL81 C�' 1 qq L4l1(o1l t ClODk) 006. 15 R6Wk0 . .. . . B. Soils report does not contain the analysis for peotential for liquefaction as required by the Uniform Building Code, 1994 Editon, Addendum is required. C. CODE RELATED COMMENTS: NONE. 1 • We have - '= e• ri:applic• o with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where :•• , / i`,• ,'.,�'o '• /d-dtoproperlyassessmisproposal. • 1 .3,2/4 Signature •irector or Auth• ed Representative Date DEVAPP.D'C Rev.10/93 i r 4(SY O +c.16..az, + �� re Nrcv REVISED NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Approval (SA), and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Devellopment Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Union Plaza Shopping Center LUA97-034,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. GENERAL LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review j Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. Additional Information: The date of Tuesday, May 13, 1997 at 9:00 AM has been tentatively set for a public hearing to review the Site Plan Approval (SA). The hearing before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. \\ A�1,Rr�, i L-I IIII R — R-8 R-'UUI UL� �~ ,� R-ID 1 ,' rear eat 11I112Y11■ R-44 R-10 LI R -C Q = *\ M6 G9 `s r111 �.III- CS r NE 4th STREET -, Cs R-3 — CZ yar .� I ' 1 P-I GENMALOT.DOC cs - 1 tuSIL•vt s Iv 9'1 R-I© — Rich and Farage Safeway,Inc. Texaco,Inc PO Box 3731 15350 SW Sequoiia Pkwy#300 PO Box 7813 Bellevue,WA 98009 Portland,OR 97224 Universal City, CA 91618 James&Judith Tokarsyck Tosco Corporation Mat Malaspina&Co 1203 Pierce Place NE 72 Cummings Point Road 309 S Cloverdale St#C1 Renton,WA 98056 Stamford, CT 06902 Seattle,WA 98108 Robert Wroten FSF Crown Pt Association Drury Pickering 529 Union Ave NE 1 Harbor Drive#200 1362 N Bonnie View Acres Road 'Renton,WA 98059 Sausalito, CA 94965 Oak Harbor,WA 98277 Daniel Zike Arthur Swanson Prompters Limited 4004 NE 4th Street 4512 Talbot Rd S 3904 NE 4th Street Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98056 Larry Howe Sound Power&Light Ceatrice McNeil 14548 SE 51st Street PO Box 90868 517 Union Ave NE Bellevue,'WA 98006 Bellevue,WA 98009 Renton,WA 98056 Norman&Joann Sundquist Robert&Carolyn Huffman James Fred&Donna Jean Dykes 4647 S 282nd St 12200 SE 18th Place 537 Union Ave NE Auburn,WA 98001 Auburn, WA 98005 Renton, WA 98056 R&S Investments Co Edward Tasca Lawrence Nieder 2101 4th Ave#250 3936 Park Ave N .5363 S Kenyon St Seattle,WA 98121 Renton,WA 98056 Seattle, WA 98118 DEMO Corp Donald Palmer Donald Maletta PO Box 2078 351 Union Ave NE 345 Union Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Daly Enterprises R 7 G Investments Union Salvage,Inc. 5626-126th.Ave SE PO Box 1149 307 Lincoln Ave Bellevue,WA 98006 Renton,WA 980576 Kent, WA 98032 Maplewood Lane Assoc. 15245 Pacific Hwy S#L2 Seattle,WA 98188 v.„ CITY OF REN1O • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS-......• • PROJECT NAME: Ut41G4 F1/4.4zA • APPLICATION NO: 11"0341 SA 0(..r The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • &ea-01140(' • g .. • ••• • .. • -••• • • • • s' • • • a rip, • ' • '--,/Ftt6-' _ . A „ /4, • • • • • , • ,:11199117• DEVELOP/O. PLANNING T.! • : . r CITY OF RENTON • , • • • (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) r (Continued) NAME ADDRESS, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification I, (/&(Z.5\1, L. , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) • owners and their addresses were obtained from: • • . Ci City of Renton Technical Services Records ,v e►:4 '�,, Title Company Records • `�• .a. : :;, King County Assessors Records Q • +. 1'44 < • Datet O G� L IigM ° R ►.• (Applicant) • •' I NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, • residing at l(0 Ll2 5 S / 45 4/- on the I,' day of 1-1'y7CL.t.,-,GA , 19 57. cross! Signed�iYl (Notary Public) • tv .??:sAtuN C i€<isi€'€ i >' ?niIi[€>€i inEN �«" .;; '�;;;:.;:.;:;;;;::::.>:�:::;;;:.;;:.;:.:.:;;.;:.:::::::.::::.;;:.:;.;:;.;:;.�.;:.:.;::.;:.;:.;»>::<>:.::'.CER'i'IFl A7`[ON€OF..M . ......... ...........:............:...........................................:.. p li ton.. e e h:e.. .o �................ ........IM.....d..t.. ............ >:(City:;�mR...Y................................ ::.....::::::::: .. ::::::::::.::::::............................................. ....:::::.�:::..:..;.:..::::.......:::::::::..:.........:::::.:�:::::::::.::.. %i'iviiv�'::::•:::::'::T:::':isisiiv::::::•'.is:•:•'.::•:':':''i}:'.1!v:;i:;i: eact:;:listed:. ..r:.o :>?rt.;.;ovv.:..e.::.o.::::........ ........�..............:..�::::::::::::::::::::::..::.:::::::.:::.�::::::::..:�:.�:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ..................................................................................... S(gngd....... ... ••;;••••••::•::;••• ate•::•:::: ::::: :::::.:::::.:..:.,.::—.;:.;:.:::;.;;;;>;;;;:.;:.;:.;;:.;:.;:.:.:.::.:.:.: ...............................................• tar.°.::Pu6Ttrii. ..rid.::for.:. ..e..::. te::.,:f*.i. hin ton;::>�1111: ,. :: :::::...::::.::,::::.:. ;:::: : :;;::;::::::.�:.::. • ..�.Y::.;:.;:.;::.;;:.;:.;;;: :':;::::>;:::::: :�;::%:::'�;:::�.'%> ':�:�'::::i::%:;:::::: ::"5 :�`:<�::i:: :::?:��':`��i':'.��ti:::`?��:i.�:�.ii'"::::::::::�'::�iS::::::::::::::i::<:::::::<::::`:i::i::::<::: ::':::;:; '::::i::::::;::±:::: ::� :;•::f.:ii<:::<: R•r;: listprop.doc 6/g/g REV-07/95 2 it ' I • • RTchardf Farago SAFEWAY II TEXACO INC-TAX DEPARTME PO Box 3731 15350 SW Sequoia Pkwy#300 PO Box 7813 Bellevue,WA 98009 Portland,OR 97224 Universal City,CA 91618 TEXACO INC-TAX DEPARTME James&Judith Tokarsyck TOSCO CORPORATION PO Box 7813 1203 Pierce PI NE 72 Cummings Point Rd Universal City,CA 91618 Renton,WA 98056 Stamford,CT 06902 MATT MALASPINA&CO INC MATT MALASPINA&CO INC 309 S Cloverdale St#CI 309 S Cloverdale St#C1 Seattle,WAI 98108 Seattle,WA 98108 Robert Wroten FSF CROWN POINTE ASSOCIATE Drury Pickering 529 Union Ave NE 1 Harbor Dr#200 1362 N Bonnie View Acres Rd • Renton,WA 98059 Sausalito,CA 94965 Oak Harbor,WA 98277 r Daniel Zike Daniel Zike Arthur Swanson 4004 NE 4th St 4004 NE 4th St 4512 Talbot Rd S Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98055 PROMPTERS LIMITED PARTNE PROMPTERS LIMITED PARTNE Larry Howe 3904 NE 4th St 3904 NE 4th St 14548 SE 51st St Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Bellevue,WA 98006 Sound Power&Light Puget Richard Titles Ceatrice McNeil PO Box 90868 521 Union Ave NE 517 Union Ave NE Bellevue,WA 98009 Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98059 • • Norman&Joann Sundquist TEXACO INC-TAX DEPARTME Robert&Carolyn Huffman 4647 S 282nd St PO Box 7813 12200 SE 18th PI Auburn,WA 98001 Universal City,CA 91618 Bellevue,WA 98005 Ceatrice McNeil James Fred&Donna Jean Dykes R&S INVESTMENT CO 517 Union Ave NE 537 Union Ave NE 2101 4th Ave#250 Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98059 Seattle,WA 98121 R E Wroten Edward Tasca Lawrence Nieder •529 Union Ave NE 3936 Park Ave N 5363 S Kenyon St Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98056 Seattle,WA 98118 DEMO CORP Donald Palmer Donald Maletta PO Box 2078 351 Union Ave NE 345 Union Ave NE Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98059 DALY ENTERPRISES Donald Palmer R 7 G INVESTMENTS 5626'126th Ave SE 351 Union Ave NE - PO Box 1149 Bellevue,WA 98006 Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98057 UNIQUE SALVAGE INC MAPLEWOOD LANE ASSOCIATES MATT MALASPINA&CO INC 307 Lincoln Ave 15245 Pacific Hwy S#L2 309 S Cloverdale St#C1 Kent,WA 98032 Seattle,WA 98188 Seattle,WA 98108 • %o • CIT' DF RENTON. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 20, 1997 Carl J. Colson Olympic Associates Company 701 Dexter Ave N#301 Seattle, WA 98109 • SUBJECT: Union Plaza Shopping Center LUA97-034,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Colson: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on April 15, 1997. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. The date of Tuesday, May 13, .1997 at 9:00 AM, has been tentatively set for a public hearing to review the Site Plan Approval (SA). The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chamber on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. Please contact me, at 235-2719, if you have any questions. Sincerely, e. Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Northwest Prompters ACCPTLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 UF)This naoer contains 50%recycled material.20%host consumer NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Approval (SA), and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Union Plaza Shopping Center LUA97-034,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total',area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. GENERAL LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit The 'application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. , mum 21,mina lrC :iIIIIIIm = R 8 lTll IIIiG1I 8 ' R-IO R-24 RM-1 MI`Itt .rah s-rx r R-10 _Z Ri a Rri-c NMICS II CS NE 4th STREET • c9 R-8 iI !&M[(PLACS G9 F-I -11 ' I J R•10 1 1 i• VICINITY MAP FOR UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER GENMALOT.DOC 01 • . .• i PENDING APPLICATION. . PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: UNION LUA97 034,SA E FPPING CENTER DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices,consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 348 parking spaces.Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. • GENERAL LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: • _Building Permit _Preliminary Plat Short Plat • _Conditional Use Permit _Rezone _XXX_Site Plan Approval XXX_Environmental Review — Shoreline Conditional Use _Other Permit Fill&Grade Permit — Shoreline Substantial _Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. 'Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative site plan approval.Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last dale of • applicant's*Notice of Application"publication in the Valley Daily News. For further Information on the application,or If • you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations,appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s)for this project,please contact the Development • • Services Division at 235.2550. The date of Tuesday,May 13.199T at 9:00 AM.has been tentatively set for a public hearing to review the Site Plan • Approval(SA).The hearing,bolero Mr.Fred Kaufman,Renton Hearing Examiner,will be held In the Council Chambers ' on the second floor of City Hall. I • \\\ /j.,_. __`gam ,i 1 • .I1 —all EllII • �' an II•C�� ® S • ■ Main r1=, a';m 7 ��4 � U 1E2E11 j_■5'r Fe* NE 4th 5T'c T _ WOO . r®. ■ • woe,xer enS Moll DAM emrrrxc r•rvrry 7 PLEASEtNCLUDE THE-PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION.•::...;_( CERTIFICATION . • I. So - - r •, hereby certify that 3 copies'of the above document were posted/by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . rylav&h ;-I, 1°[�"I •. • Signed:Ea d a�en STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • . ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know -or have satisfactory evidence that A.-AM/ ,�y kCo / signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary`s crt'4or the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 3/ Gj�lA % � 6� , /✓� Public St`a�;'.� - ATtiirr toil NotaryPub is and for a 1N �� J'.�10, .4.r Notary (Print) MA-RoT A AA. '-5 c ��'�It-G L My appointment expires: �0/�///� , NO TAR Y.00C • t ' ''',4m1111110 PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA97-034,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices,consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. GENERAL LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat Conditional Use Permit Rezone _XXX_Site Plan Approval _XXX_Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use Other I Permit • Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's"Notice of Application" publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. The date Iof Tuesday, May 13, 1997 at 9:00 AM, has been tentatively set for a public hearing to review the Site Plan Approval(SA). The hearing,before Mr.Fred Kaufman,Renton Hearing Examiner,will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. • ID7 'E1 Wei A 1111d111M111 =1.14-vin= Er R-S 111 11111 MIh(.IR =.11113 -9EIM R-10 IMMIN Wagon RI-I I 12-10 immomZ 91111 NE 4th STREET • RB ■ ■ I I PP ■! llt•� PI . ■ VICINITY MAP FOR UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENT55 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER?FILE IDENTIFICATION::>>< "; ::'� • • >•.N. :ENT`;:ui.m ?.!og limiig<> > »<`' >>' ><'<i<<?f '>??`<':>>:>p '� ..< ERV _E;:.:p VS 0 <'` s> < > <`s<"'> ':':>' »>> "<> >< < > < >' ><`>' > ' < S C 5 S N:::::>:>::::: ::::::::»>:<:»:::><:::::;»:»»::::>:>::>::::::>::>:<:>>:<<::�:::>:<::::<:>::>::>::<»>:;�:>:»<:::::: :..; .L0:; ENT... . R...I. .E ..D.I...1. .. ..:......... .'. ..` R.O:J E CT,;:I N:;. O.:::;•;<.:::<:>T.::;::<:'<>`>< > >> »< : ::; :::::»>:>;:>;::: CT..INFORM .. T :>:::<;:::>:<:::::::»:<:>:«::::::>:;:>.:>:::::::P•RO.:;ERTY::>O.r11rNE�i...S `»>> > < ;>: >><<>»i :::<::::::::<::<:::>::>::>: ..:............... .. A .I.ON............................. Note ::lf:;there l5;n1ore than;:one::legal;;owner:;;pease attach an eddit onal :.iotanzed:'Master:Application for:each owner•:.,. ,.. .. ..:. . < PROJEC CT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: �,��p,� NAME: r.'� j'1 Ur✓� vY 1 17i�/ CJ � �:� "`.' L 4r 1-eel, ((' n- ry ADDRESS:3®CD �2�4'V'tj J� e !_ I PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION:'(� 3cta �� Lill-- S-- . • CITY:, IS IQI ZIP: qgo KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): . Ot2305 - '1rto • TELEPHONE NUMBER: zat, Z,Z_ (2U g..,c., EXISTING LAND USE(S): ' V6&ax 4 / Ci0rr►.11/1 : :>:: :: :APPLI.0 4N:Ti if`oth`er<than`Do n'er:: `_ > >° '`` .. .........................................................................................................: ... I PROPOSED LAND USES: ��` NAME: Sa, t°i `�i' aLe awry)l.f'v cer _` . COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: C_,rj ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP %r.,GNATION (if applicable; CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: ®6c`, ' 7� • L6 C?YO�F,yT ��9� . •9 ,o� TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): e 41/1% • • ;N;;..ACT.._;:: :E:R .;>:.:;>::»; : ``i:',i:<< <` >' >'' .CON C SON P ........................... .. ........................................................................................................ .............................. SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: l I �+ coCson COMPANY(if applicable):Vt r/1.,i.,t""/ . Q[;G bfr'� lJ°. PROJECT VALUE: V f 2_000I0Ob • ADDRESS: 701 1)2 „/o.,, Ar N 41 �O IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? c l vr']urC/V Are, AO . ' CITY: p WA ZIP: �...U.Q1oq IS THESITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY I. SENSITIVE AREA? 12.016 le300 )h , tuo TELEPHONE NUMBER: 85 ., 143iI Fay • :: :::<::>::::>::6g:::: :>:fiLEGAL`:'DESC''RIPTION<.OF<:PROPERTY> Attach.'!:!se.. .agate::>sheet``if:'necessar... :<:><:;:>>::••:':::::�::::i:::::•:..:.:::::::.:.:.......::.:: .... i Zi i!FEES:::::'::::::':: ::':::>:::::::::::::::':::::::::::: : `<1 >` <> ''>' '`::;<::::<:>::>::::::::;<::<:::>:.>::::>:::>�::::<:>:>:::>:<:»>:<>;::;:::::«:>:>::�:>::::::;>::_:::::>•::>::>:>::>::»:�::>�>:>Tll`PE F<AFPLICATI:OIV..&. . '`ff.. de:term n' fe§:::,5{:: :`:: ': :::` : ` ` >> h<: ;< ``i::::;��'-:Cit�`': sta a es .. • 1 _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $_ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ I —TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT . $ — PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ c-�:,•-- _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY —WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION_ MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: "I _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ i ' _ VARIANCE $ • — EXEMPTION $No Charge — ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ -.S-e3r.`• REVISION $ _ I - !I :::::>::>:;:::;:<:::<:::<:::::::; >::»::::::<:::::::>:::::::::::::::::>::::::>::::::<:::: >::::::: >;:<HE::::::::>::<::>::::}AFF DAvIT:<OF::::.O:WNERSHI ............ I, (Print Name) t eill L Hr!({=-(',declare that I am (please check one)._the owner of the property involved in this application,_the • authorized representative to act for the Ooperty owner(please.attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. • / O��E ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and• tG�.' Cj- 4 {`!<_ . , ' ` ••' for the State of (ua )1in39r) residing at_„. (Name of 0 ner/Representative) 6a `' ,on the /=day of w .•o- y mtx��.�i ,9 . • • S. t �� (Sign re f caner/Re► - -i : ive) .9',, l'•;`k® 7 �.• ( 'Iu � _.,--.- (Signature of Notary Public) . s`sec o e om a <;p: `::S Ci FBI Number....:: . :.:.::.;.;;;:.:� �;:.<::.:> >» .:::..A:..:R: :.SHP,:L>::>:::GU:;;�1'�5..:�PF�::::r.:e::Z:.z...:.SP::::::ftVM.:.::::....::.:::: .:.:..:::.�::::: .:..:::::::::::::::.:::.:.:::.::.:::::::..:.�..:..................:.:.:::.AAD...:.W.....FP. . ......5:..::.:.SME.,..MHP.:,:.E).9,F....:A..:.:..:..�A:.:::.....,::...:..:::,:..:....::.......:..: eimniiiliMiNg ............:.::.:>:.............::::. :.::::.:::.:::::::::::: ;:::::;::.::.. . ..: ..:::::: :::.:::::::::::::::::::::..:::::::TOTAL..F.. ES....:: :.:.� .....,.::::::.�::...::..::.:::.::.:.:OTAL:PQS..7`aGE:»FRO:.:.1. .....::.:::.: � � ::.,.:.:::::a::::.:::.. ..M111111111111111111411111111111111111.111111111•11111_ , , . _- - , .- - ----.-----.‘-- . O 0 CITY OF RENTON , - . . -.,::.-7:'''...• '.. • •:-- ',:.:--•'/- -- -----;,;'i"-1 ip.r..-,z.#4, 4,,,a: •1.. .:• vomalialwiwomio 41• • NA Planning!Building/Public Works • -?- ----, I- cg 'Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 . Ucos . 2-ITT V-fd;e'i_t.vA.,;4411 . ' . •• ! ' • 0.44. P prit TER • --1'. . , 7. , eV' _ •"-•41'.:;'. : „. . 4 • ,.,.. .j. ..../T ...1?Vij • Prompters Limited lo 3904 NE 4th Street Renton, WA 98056 S ,iC H ..... 1,,,-----------.:, L E E1 . ITurvi'_•',t;1 _...., --f, ! ' a V4Ni !RETUP.N1 10 SENDEr I . ,,,,I) vsri,?:,/4')..c..YS VA. - • ...elj"):• -1 ____I ,_ • • NT REVISED NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Approval (SA), and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the.necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Union Plaza Shopping Center LUA97-034,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. GENERAL LOCATION: 3904 NE 4thStreet- PUBLIC APPROVALS: 1 Environmental Review •--- , Site Plan Approval : _ Building Permit ,.-. -.....-._1- • • ---..... ._- The application can be reviewed in the:Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted;anytime prior. to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan,approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. Additional Information: The date of Tuesday, May 13, 1997 at 9:00 AM has been tentatively set for a public hearing to review the Site Plan Approval (SA). 'The hearing before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will beheld in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. w 0. \\\ 1'�i �u ` N �� Y� _ .1��_ t Y �� !N i11=P: 24 Wi!Z)-- 1 III K!N , __ i I 111] 1 �41111 EE R-Io -i-- 11 11 yL ,'e.,.', I I RfS-I I R-24 I Wt. R-IO L Rf l R-Ic Lam "' CS R•10 Z ill RII-C AM \.`lk, Z C5 i ., c . ' _ M\\ 0 _ NE 4th STiREET .. ,I ,.I: . a R.g. — PI GENT ALOT.DOC CS --II R IC' .. • ....../1/ 1 -- -- -- . • • .. a 0 CITY OF RENTON !.,:-. ' •:.---:-=. • -%: ' = ', - - :':'-_,...-- ---;-, ..u. Planning/Building/Public Works . , .0,PO 7 0+ le,e,4-,,t;t1.-: ------u.'‘.esi., -_-_ t • •-ti Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 2 .go 3 2 -- • RAI 113T 10-4.q.. Z, .. • ' dia02. ..• • . . . .,. • : iv...43::... ...., • - - D11 BiCokneniiinegview ..7'2•L - . . 71. 4076 . . '-'1'-'11 -:,`. . 4 ., .,' . 13r621YNP Acres Road ' ..._,...., , . . .. - Oak Harbor, WA 98277 t.ce,..14-1 PICK36 9,5277aool 1196 11 OB/24/97 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND PICKERING PO BOX 1018 OAK HARBOR WA -98277 -1018 . . „ - • /- •• . :\ . .„ _ • . - . ' •c' ' •:',' •-1:'. • • • --.:%7V7,-:.-7".4. ...‘.,A.5:-.A i•-•• . . . 'Stiiittr:::t.. ..c.e;.4-r..115.1 ililisitillilitititlititlitAii-iitinititilitiiitaiti'i-tliti ••• •---- . i 2f 1 CITY OF RENTON - ' -- =:_ :- Planning/Building/Public Works GoFt."�04, '' ;,-�-'` �""�"- 0.'Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 cR 2 ,'vex `�'3 IL g 7 076 = "14:2 ; Robert& Carolyn Huffman 12200 SE 18th Place Auburn, WA Atiphro. ,y` N0 SU-CH .�-- NUMBEF, . IRETURN TO SENDER 3 �.I.r.)a.:^; .:tx, .A.- 11,1„1,:1,11.1,1„1,1,,,1:1,,,141„i,M.11.11,,,;,11d I a ti`SY O baU REVISED NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Approval (SA), and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Union Plaza Shopping Center LUA97-034,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. GENERAL LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street • PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval ' { ' Bungling Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development'Services'Diivision located.-o'n the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted ianytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive addi�ional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. Additional Information: The date of Tuesday, May 13, 1997 at 9:00 AM has been tentatively set for a public hearing to review the Site Plan Approval (SA). The hearing before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will beheld in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. --FMR 8 f-� R-6 II II R1 I I I � R.1O �-- -- 1_ ''e.,e T I I Rfe-I I Q_Z.{ �♦ R-I° L FM-1 L� 1—LLI Co R10 Z1 I CS 2 I 4 r `.: .. -NE 4thiSTREET R-a ," — GENMALOT.DOC a 0 CITY OF RENTON ..... . • • Planning/Building/Public Works .4, c.... 14-'E_r4 r 04e wrolr'44,,;s---,,z - day'---7. i I— dcc cc --I ,1/ .. . nnn 4, LUV Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 0 `-' AAR 2 0'9 T pe Ar; a Z I .L 7.4)1T4.n w C/3 it 2 n rffiE TER • 0 \,0 ',..i i(..i 1 ( A I I I ,v11 i I i) lii\IKNOvvi\, 71 r 4176 . .4:9•A • ' : I ;\I'zAJI I I ( II \I I A1)1)1i1 :,':-, Iti 1 UNI)I I A 5 HOW ' 1) A li I I I o 1 , i , VA CAN I 0\:(;I A I :',/!I I) I ):I' I RI I) It)ll I I k.i ..61,I N I I I AI ';)FIK.1 PROMPTERS LIMITED PARTNE 3904 NE 4th St Renton,WA 98056 co s'-'''sti ri to VI V --e •31:4§6..e:VILV,41. 1-:, 11,1.1,.1,11....1.1‘.1.1m1,1„.111.1.1.1.,11„.11 11.1 7, UNDER 1 frAA •-1'•.*" • • j+ seP NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Approval (SA), and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. • PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Union Plaza Shopping Center LUA97-034,SA,ECF • DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. GENERAL LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit; The application can be reviewed in the Development' Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during'Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. ev, I;=.� ` R-8 R-'1111 II�IiL1■ —111111.--- R-10 I 1M '6"„REct 11Erm. _ .? -a I R-10 R-24 • I1-I R•10 . Z evenet�r Immo rdI-G CS NE 4th STREET cs hExe�FUCs . _ .... .• • P I —� i ',., R-10 — • . VICINITY MAP FOR UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER GENMALOT.DOC 0 IfW2Do ' a 6 CITY OF RENTON rf ' '4 k- i/›.-",- ; "- t'f7---_,... - - s--"- Planning/Building/Public Works . .- VI . ..... ,- ------- , ,,,...,-,,,------------, - op [' . 44 dir ,------, t----------, ,o'Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 _ 2 MA A P;1 411----- *------ —-7,--- - ---- "---!.._ * mr.... /9 91 kttl. --- ------- •..------------, • En • 7, .76 4i Drury Pickering 1362 N Bonnie View Acres Rd Oak Harbor,7-- PICK562 982772014 1196 18 03/22/97 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND PICKERING I PO BOX 1018 OAK HARBOR WA '73.7.77-1013 1 ..._,_. -------------.-----I; ''. R ET URN c--',->: ' ...di • LE61 -1 W MIN x I - , ,Tderawrweliekitaa twa HitIkdahudduldmhhaliddshilhia;iall } • • • ♦D.® + NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Approval (SA), and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Union Plaza Shopping Center LUA97-034,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. GENERAL LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street , PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval -- , Building.Permit • The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings,.during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish.to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive• additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. I��:;; z = , ey11 nir■r3 1: 1/1111111'un.i. R-Es -0H HNadi =a♦1111.M R-ID ,m+ mum 8 ' R-10MI= =121 • 211 I R-10 itsi.z.11 `5 rlil z�� ■ � • NE 4th• NESTREET . , R-8 • �'� • FI . ■ VICINITY MAP FOR UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER GENMALOT.DOC /""\ UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER • Project Narrative Size and location of Site: 5.84 Acres 3904 NE 4th Street Renton,Wa Township: 23N Range: 5 E Section: SE 9 Current Use of the Site: Site is vacant and contains a house and garage,both of which will be demolished. Special Site features: The site is currently wooded and contains several large depressions (or gullies)which are man-made and will be filled in with soil that will be cut at the front side of the site in order to make the site usable. Number and Location of Existing Structures and Residential Units which may have views obstructed: This site is currently wooded and removing the existing trees will allow any adjacent residential units to have access to any views which might be created as a result of the tree clearing. The proposed building heights will not block any views. Proposed Use of the Property,Project Name, and Scope of the Proposed Improvements: Retail Shopping Center and Offices The project name will be"Union Plaza". There will be 4 buildings on the site with a total of 80,496 square feet. The primary building materials will be split face concrete block,glass storefront systems,and pre-finished metal roofing. The height of the tallest portion of the buildings will be 37'-10"above finish grade. 346 Parking Spaces will be provided.These spaces include 328 full size spaces, 11 compact spaces,and 7 handicap Accessible spaces. Site Coverage: 65%of the site will be covered by buildings. Access to the site will be at two entries located on NE 4th Street. 1997 oZVELOpA4E-iv,P CM'OFRe"ONNir�c. r UNION PLAZA Construction Mitigation Description Proposed Construction Dates: Begin construction in June, 1997 and complete construction in December, 1997. Hours of Operation: 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Proposed Hauling Routes:NE 3`d and NE 4th Streets. Measures to be Implemented to Minimize Construction Impacts: A construction entrance will be paved with rock to eliminate construction vehicles from tracking mud on the existing street as they leave the construction site. The site should be sprayed with water(during the non-rainy months)to help eliminate dust problems. Construction shall occur between 7:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to minimize noise disruptions to the surrounding sites. The contractor shall comply with City of Renton standards pertaining to traffic control while deliveries are being made the site. UNION PLAZA L4NCLE4ING FLAN I I I I N T ,0= Ill i////-// /i%/) - //% %%//,/// /2//,/ /2, / / / I i / 7 1The entire site is current) �� wooded and shall be cleared of/// l" all treestom '4 i make the site usable for //� yL ?,/the Intended use as a shopping center./,, ,< ///� //�////�/ ' I *7 ?2Z : ��//7/ Ø;1 I I ,./ / .. ., / / . ,/////// // / / / / / /_/ ,_/ / / / , ..2. NE lth STET 1 1 :///,:p,. 1 1 I K------ I I, } I SORT! i �� I I �'� I .0 i /6, °<dA�' , ' ' , 1I POpivl Toil��MC" • ::::::::::.::::.;:.;:.;;:.;;:.:;;;::::�:;;;;;::.::.;:.;::.:»;:.::.;:.;;::::«.;:.:.:...:. ....................... . T,.. . R1l'( ES DIVI.SLON............................................................................ 11.1111111111ENVIRONMENTALICHECKLISTEESIS • PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: • The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this.checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. 'I . INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of. your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefy, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. • You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be. significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not • apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and"affected geographic area," respectively. RECEIVED MR181997 DEVELOPMENTCITY OF RETI ONMt�IG N i + b Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Union Plaza Shopping Center 2. Name of applicant: Northwest Prompters, Limited Partnership 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 3010 - 77th Avenue SE Suite 201 Mercer Island, WA 98040 Phone: 206-232-1388 Contact: Ricky Chang 4. Date checklist prepared: March 17, 1997 _ 5. Agency requesting checklist: Development Services Division • 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phPasing, if applicable): Begin construction in June, 1997 and complete construction December, 1997. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. I ` None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals ' directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton - Site Plan Approval 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. To construct a 80,436 square foot shopping center (with retail and office space) on a 254,698 square foot site. 346 parking spaces will be provided. ' 2 Environmental Checklist 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. . 3904 NE 4th Street Location: Renton, WA Township 23N Section SE9 Range 5E 5.84 Acres B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat,:rollinssteep slopes, mountainous, other • b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 6-15% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Alderwood - Hydrologi.c Group "C" d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, • describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading .proposed. Indicate source of fill. The front portion of the site would be graded to level the front of the site. This cut material would be used to fill the man-made gully at the rear of the site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 85% • 3 Environmental Checklist • h. I Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Run-off water will be detained and will not erode the site. 2. AIR • a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,dust, automobile, .;odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If ..any,•generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None • b. Are there any off-site sources of,emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None • 3. WATER a. ; Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- ; round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,-wetlands)?• If yes;.describe type and provide names. If appro riate, state what stream or river it flows into. Project is located at the crest of two drainage basins. No offsite drainage enters the project. There are no surface water bodies. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. • Does not apply. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from. surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Does not apply. • 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. • Does not apply. 5) • ; Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No • I ` Environmental Checklist - 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No . b. Ground Water: 1) . :.Will.ground water be.withdrawn,,or will water be discharged to-ground water? Give -.:general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Storm water detention systems will be used. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from•septic tanks or other sources, .if any (for.example: Domestic sewage; industrial,: containing'.the:following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size-of.the system;.°the'number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of . animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Does not apply. pP Y• c. Water Runoff(including storm water): • • 1) Describe the.source of runoff. (including storm water) ..and.methodrof.collection and disposal, if any (include quantities,.if known)::Where will this water flow? ..Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Storm water runoff from building roofs and paving will be collected in storm water detention systems. The storm water will infiltrate the soil or be channeled to enter adjacent detention systems. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters?.:If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Below grade water retention system. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs • grass • pasture crop or grain • wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,skunk cabbage,other water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? • Due to the cut and fill required for this project, all existing plant.material will be removed. The site will be landscaped according to the landscape architects plan. 5 Environmental Checklist - C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Refer to landscape plan • 5. ANIMALS a. . ~..Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on-or near the site.or.are known to be on or near the site: (see next page) None observed . Birds: hawk, heron, eagle,songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon,trout, herring, shellfish, other b. . .List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None . • c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None • 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES { • a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity used for lighting and heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? I List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: All sidewalks in front of each building are covered and this will prevent heat gain at the storefront windows. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 6 ' • Environmental Checklist a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None • 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) • What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,- equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example:.-traffic,•construction,=:operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. • Construction noise: 7:00am - 4:00pm -- short .term Traffic noise: 8:00am - 9:00pm -- long term- 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Planting at site perimeter 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? • Site is vacant, surrounding sites are residential and commercial . b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. • . Vacant house and garage d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? Vacant house and garage will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CS • f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? ' CS Environmental Checklist ' i I • 0. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No • • i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 50 employees at any given time. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is .compatible with existing:.and:.projected land uses and plans, if any: Site remains CS zoning and will be compatible with nearby commercial uses. 9. HOUSING a. ; Approximately how many units,would be provided, if any? • Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. ! Does not apply. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Does not apply. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Does not apply. 10. AESTHETICS ! . a. What is the tallest height of any.proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(slpro os d. 38'-0" high. Building materials to be split-faced concrete block, glass storefront systems, and painted metal roofing. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: • Taller portions of the buildings are at the rear of the site, away from the site entry at NE 4th Street. , 8 Environmental Checklist 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light would come from the storefront windows and parking lot lighting. Storefront lighting will be from dusk till 10:00pm. Parking lot lighting to be from dusk till dawn. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No • c. • What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,,if any: Parking lot lighting to be directed away from residential areas. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses?.-If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts-on-recreation,. including-recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. HISTORIC.AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION • • a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. . Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N one 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Union Avenue, NE 4th Street. Access to the existing• street system will be via the site entry drives to NE 4th Street. 9 � N Environmental Checklist b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Unknown at this time. c. • How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 346 spaces- provided, no existing spaces would be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,-or•improvements.to•existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally'describe.(indicate whether.public or private? No e. Will the project use (or occur .in 'the immediate .vicinity.:.of) _water,::rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular:trips per day_would'be!generated:by.the completed:project?. If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 4,067 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service,telephone, sanitary sewer,septic system, other. Electricity, water, sanitary sewer ' 10 Environmental Checklist b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. C. SIGNATURE _I, .the:undersigned, state that to the best.of my knowledge the;above information is true and complete. It.:is:understood.that the:lead agency .may f.withdraw.any declaration of non- . .significance that it might.issue in .reliance:upon this•checklist-should there be any willful misrepresentation or w' ul c of II isclosure on my part. Proponent: M/ Name Printed: L • Co - i : r Date: 3 / 7 '' 7 - • • 11 Environmental Checklist D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS >: : se::<sheets;<shottldon1 .;>:..e;usedfor �ctlans>:�anvolvin >:>decisions»nn:> oaicies<::> la :°�°� . Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. ...:When answering these questions, be aware of the extent.the proposal,-or the types of activities likely.to.result from the.proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate • than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly-and in general terms. •.1. • . How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to.water,;emissions to air;.production, . ..storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of-noise? • Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. • How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? • •• Proposed measures to protector conserve plants,,animals,-fish,-or marine life are: 3.. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or;conserve energy and natural resources are: . I f 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? . • Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? • Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: • 12 Environmental Checklist 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: • • 7. . Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any .declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance•upon this checklist should there .be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: ' Name Printed: • Date:' REVISED 9194 • 13 ILEA/ ,r•.- bai 7/b 9J J , STATE OF WASHINGTON 1 OCT 2 2 1996 CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP RALPH MUNRO SECRETARY OF STATE The undersigned, for the purpose of forming a limited partnershp under the Washington Limited Partnership Act, RCW 25. 10, hereby adopts the following Certificate of Limited Partnership: ARTICLE I The name of the partnership is Northwest Prompters Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership. ARTICLE II The name and address of the general partner of the partnership, and where all records are kept, is: Northwest Prompters Limited Partnership 3010 77th Avenue SE, Suite 201 Mercer Island, WA 98040 • ARTICLE III The name of the Registered Agent of the partnership for service of process Henry Liebman. The street address of the Registered Agent's office is: COE, NORDWALL & LIEBMAN, LLP Suite 1300 720 Olive Way Seattle, WA 98101 ARTICLE IV Partnership is of thirty five years duration, or, until October 22, 2031. ARTICLE V The name and mailing address of the General Partner is per the attached Schedule A. This document is hereby executed under penalties of perjury, andis, to the best of my knowledge, true and correct. DATED: October 22 , 1996 RECEIVED i C:Y`. h� , ing General Partner ,) VELt NOIEFOT PLANNING CITY OF RE'NTON CONSENT TO SERVE AS REGISTERED AGENT I, Henry G. Liebman of Coe, Nordwall, Liebman & Friend, hereby consent to serve as Registered Agent, in the State of Washington for NORTHWEST PROMPTERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Washington limited partnership (the "Partnership") . I understand that as agent for the Partnership, it will be my responsibility to receive service of process in the name of the Partnership; to forward all mail to the Partnership; and to immediately notify the office of the Secretary , of State in the event of my resignation, or o any changes in the registered office address of the Partnership, for which I am agent. DATED this 22nd day of October, 1996. / AGENT: Henry G. Liebman COE, NORDWALL & LIEBMAN, LLP Suite 1300 720 Olive Way Seattle, WA 98101 TELEPHONE: (206) 624-5622 • I l SCHEDULE A GENERAL PARTNERS Anthony Show-Tsu Lin Toptex Network Ltd. 12900 SE 44th Court 3010 77th Avenue SE, Suite 201 Bellevue, WA 98006 Mercer Island, WA 98040 Ricky C.Y. Chang Benjamin K.C. Lee Managing General Partner 3455 North Blaine Street 15202 NE 167th Place Seattle, WA 98199 Woodinville, WA 98072 • **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 03/18/97 14 :32 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9701647 Amount : 2, 512 . 16 03/18/97 14 :31 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #10049 NORTHWEST Init : LN Project # : LUA97-034 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 092305-9110 Site Address : 3904 NE 4TH ST Total Fees : 2, 512 . 16 This Payment 2, 512 .16 Total ALL Pmts : 2, 512 . 16 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 0007345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 0001345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 2, 000 . 00 000 : 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 12 . 16 I CITY )F RENTON ..� 1 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 12, 1997 Mr. Carl J. Colson Olympic Associates Company 701 Dexter Ave N #301 Seattle, WA 98109 SUBJECT: Union Plaza Shopping Center Project No. LUA-97-034,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Colson: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. As you know, the Site Approval (SA) portion of the proposed application will be heard at a public hearing before Renton Hearing Examiner on May 13, 1997. The Hearing Examiner will issue a separate report and decision. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 235-2719. For the Environmental Review Committee, 6-0—)kj\ Peter Rosen Project Manager FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer i:10 Washington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Sid Morrison P.O. Box 330310 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DATE: May 16, 1997 r'T"nP•RENTON TO: Peter Rosen �>>�( 2 1997 City of Renton, Project Manager ��I�� 200 Mill Avenue South D Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 405 MP 4.02 CS 1744 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance - Union Plaza Shopping Center-Construction of 4 bldg. total area 80,496 sq. ft. with 346 parking spaces consisting of retail shopping & offices File No.LUA-97-034,SA,ECF FROM: Robert A. Joseph on, E, Manager of Planning & Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project, which is located at 3904 NE 4th Avenue . Our response is below: We recommend that a traffic study be prepared to analyze the state highway intersections that are impacted by ten (10) or more of the project's generated peak hour trips and also determine what mitigation measures, if any would be required. If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King ) MARILYN MOSES ,being first duly sworn,upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 19th day of May ,1997, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled.application or petition. Signature: /4 , SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this_AL_day of 141 , 1997. J ary ublic ' and or the State of Washington, residing at ,therein. Application, Petition, or Case No.: Union.Plaza Shopping Center LUA-097-034,SA The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record • • • • • y'. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . i. • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • ;'�' • • -.4 • • • • • ' • • • • • • HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT 0 May 19, 1997 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: Carl Colson Olympic Associates Co. Union Plaza Shopping Center File No.: LUA-97-034,SA LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Seeking site plan approval to construct retail shopping center and offices SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on May 7, 1997 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report,examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the May 13, 1997 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,May 13, 1997, at 9:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity map application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site plan Exhibit No.4: Landscape plan Exhibit No. 5: Building elevations The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by PETER ROSEN,Project Manager,Development Services,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,Washington 98055. The applicant requests site plan approval for a retail shopping center. This 5.5 acre site is presently undeveloped. It is rolling and is wooded. Carl Colson Olympic Associates Co. Union Plaza Shopping Center File No.: LUA-97-034,SA May 19, 1997 Page 2 • There are four buildings proposed on the site and they are oriented towards the interior parking lot. Buildings A, C and D are north-south axis and the largest building,Building B, is located on the north end of the site. Building A and a portion of Building B are also proposed with second story offices.There would be approximately 22,200 square feet of retail space, 12,916 square feet of office,25,953 square feet of restaurant, and 22,427 square feet of grocery for a total of 83,496 square feet. Building B is mostly grocery store with some retail associated,and with office above it. There is a 20 foot break between Buildings C and D for a utility corridor on the east portion of the site. The access is proposed from two driveway cuts off NE 4th Street ,and they are separated by approximately 165 feet. There are 346 parking spaces proposed to serve all the uses within the shopping center. The landscape plan includes buffers around the site. In the vicinity to the north of the site is residential area. Code requires a landscape setback which applicant is providing along the north property boundary. Renton Crown Apartments is directly to the west of the site and a landscape buffer is being provided on that side of the property. Directly to the east of the site is some commercial development along NE 4th. The proposal went through environmental review on April 15, 1997 and received a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M). The Environmental Review Committee mitigation measures require fire mitigation fee,traffic mitigation fee and a revision to the construction mitigation plan limiting haul hours. In terms of the site plan criteria, it is within the Center Suburban Comprehensive Plan(CP)designation and that is also the zoning designation for the site. The proposal conforms to the intent of the Center Suburban designation in that buildings face toward the interior of the parking area which avoids a commercial strip type of development. The uses appear to be scaled to serve the neighborhood. The building elevations indicate a number of store fronts and the scale of the different uses are smaller and would be neighborhood serving. In terms of conformance with the zoning,retail and restaurant uses are allowed as primary permitted uses and offices are allowed as a secondary use in the CS zone with the condition that it total less than 50%of the gross square footage of the site. It equals approximately 5%of the gross square footage. Having the offices on the second story above the retail also appears to be encouraged by CP policies which encourage more of a mix of uses and more intensive uses than the surrounding areas. The building elevations,the varied rooflines and materials appear to be appropriate for the character of the neighborhood commercial center. The proposal does not meet code in the area of setbacks in that it does exceed the maximum setback of 15 feet in the CS zone. Building A is approximately 87 feet from NE 4th and Building D is approximately 96 feet. In the applicant's letter dated April 9, 1997,they provided some justification for exceeding the setback. For Building D they noted that as there is an existing building directly to the east,that bringing Building D closer to the street could undermine the existing building because it is so close to the property line. The revised site plan shows sidewalk linkages from NE 4th into the shopping center which would connect up to the sidewalks that front all the buildings. There is fairly good pedestrian circulation through the shopping center. One of the criteria for exceeding the maximum setback is to accommodate the pedestrian by using pedestrian walkways and encouraging pedestrian amenities. In addition,staff has recommended some additional pedestrian walkways. One is an east-west walkway connection across the interior of the parking area to be lined up with the corridor that separates Buildings C and D. Staff also recommended that the applicant work with staff to look at potential pedestrian access from the surrounding uses,particularly Renton Crown Apartments,to provide an access onto the site so not everybody adjacent would have to walk around to enter the site via 4th. Carl Colson Olympic Associates Co. Union Plaza Shopping Center i File No.: LUA-97-034,SA May 19, 1997 Page 3 The applicant has provided landscaping along the frontage in terms of a berm landscape strip and landscape islands to break up the appearance of the parking and to make more of an interesting street-scape. This is also one of the criteria for exceeding the setback. Applicant has provided more than the required interior parking lot landscaping as well. The maximum building height would be 37 feet which is the top of the tower proposed on Building B. CS Zone allows a maximum of 50 feet. The proposal meets the parking requirement with 346 spaces. There is a 20 foot one-way fire lane that goes around the north end of Building B and the west end of the site, and is principally for fire access. The truck loading dock for Building B is on the west side and it appeared from the site plan that the drive would then narrow to 18 feet at that point. Staff is recommending a condition that there be a 20 foot clear area for fire access. In previous shopping center and grocery store proposals in the City, there has been a fair amount of concern with truck loading docks and noise generated for neighbors. The ;proposed truck loading is along the west side of Building B and adjacent to Renton Crown Apartments. Staff l has also recommended a condition that the applicant record a covenant that would require a noise test if there 'were complaints from the surrounding residences. In conclusion, staff recommends approval of the proposal subject to: (1) compliance with the ERC mitigation measures;(2)revision of the site plan to provide 20 foot clear access around the building interior; (3)east-west pedestrian connection across the interior of the parking lot to improve pedestrian circulation; (4)provision of pedestrian access with adjacent properties, if practical; and(5)recording of a covenant for noise tests for truck loading if surrounding residents express complaints about that fact. Larry Cross, Olympic Associates, 701 Dexter Avenue North, Seattle, Washington 98109, applicant herein, :stated that they are comfortable with staff recommendations. Regarding the setback issue,.he stated that there is quite a rise to the site from the street so the landscape buffer is needed to get cars up into the parking lot. As a result of discussions with the Fire Department,two access points into the site are required. The space between the two buildings on the east side of the property, C and D, is intended as a service corridor for dumpsters as one of the buildings is intended to be a restaurant. It also has to do with fire access to the back of the buildings and is not intended as a pedestrian corridor. On the northwest corner of the property there is a large area of landscape buffer for two reasons. One is to ;meet the landscape buffer requirements and the other is that it has a steep drop-off of about 20 feet. As far as pedestrian access from the adjacent property,he stated that the residential complex may not want access out of 'the shopping center for security reasons. IThe Examiner asked if there was any reason why the access and delivery could not be switched to the other lend of Building B. Mr. Cross responded that the grocery store doesn't continue all the way to that side of the ;building. That is a small accessory retail area that is separate from the grocery store, so grocery store loading ''or warehouse loading is what is needed. To flip that separate retail area to the other side of the building buries 'it behind Building A. Also from a practical standpoint for a truck, as there is one-way access around Building A,a truck would have to pull out into the parking lot and back up. The way it is designed now they are able to stay out of the circulation which is another Fire Department issue concerning loading. That would not be possible if it was flipped it to the other side. This is a fairly small grocery store of approximately 20,000 square feet. The deliveries are mostly off hours,and large trucks are not anticipated,no more than 30-foot type delivery vans. 1 Carl Colson Olympic Associates Co. Union Plaza Shopping Center File No.: LUA-97-034,SA 'May 19, 1997 �P age 4 The Examiner explained that there have been some very poor juxtaposition of delivery bays with residential development in the City, and they generally lead to confrontations or complaints. Noise ordinance requirements don't necessarily eliminate beepers that wake people up in the middle of the night. Just because sound requirements are met doesn't mean people are not disturbed by the noises that are generated. Neil Watts,Plan Review Supervisor,Development Services, City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South.,Renton, Washington 98055, stated that the driveway access off NE 4th is good for entry and exit on both sides. There are two lanes of traffic and a center turn lane. The,location is some distance between signals but there is !queuing that occurs at those signals so there is adequate gaps for people to get in and out of the site. The parking lot is going to be at somewhat higher grade than the street,but as long as there is the bigger front setback, it is manageable. Carl Colson, Olympic Associates,701 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 301 Seattle, Washington 98109,applicant herein, stated that the building elevation at the end of Building D will be approximately 26 feet 6 inches to the ridge of the roof. Building A elevation will be 34 feet 11 inches to the ridge of the roof. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak,and :no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:42 a.m. 1FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS&DECISION ,Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,Carl Colson,Olympic Associates Company,filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for a 4-building shopping center. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. • 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 15. The subject site is located at 3904 NE 4th Street. The subject site is located on the north side of NE 4th just west of Union Avenue NE. 6. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 2290 enacted in November 1966. The site received its current zoning,CS(Suburban Center),with the adoption of Ordinance 4405 enacted in June 1993. 7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of multiple-story retail and office uses in clustered development patterns, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. Carl Colson Olympic Associates Co. Union Plaza Shopping Center File No.: LUA-97-034,SA May 19, 1997 iPage5 ; 8. The applicant proposes developing a shopping center around a centrally located parking lot. There will be four buildings providing a total of approximately 83,496 square feet of retail and office space. 9. Building A which will be located along the western side of the parcel will be oriented in a north-south alignment. It will contain approximately 17,182 square feet of retail space on the first floor and 19,203 square feet proposed for office uses on a second floor. The building will be approximately 55 feet wide by 320 feet long. 10. Building B will be divided into three component areas. The first two areas will be on the first floor. One of those will be a proposed grocery store containing approximately 22,427 square feet. The second, first floor element will be a retail space of approximately 5,018 square feet. There will be approximately 3,000 square feet of office space on the second level. Building B will be located at the north end of the site. The building will be approximately 181 feet wide(east to west)by approximately 125 feet deep. 11. Buildings C and D will be located along the east edge of the site and will be oriented in a north-south alignment. Building C will be the northernmost of these two buildings. It will contain approximately 7,613 square feet of space. It is proposed to be restaurant. The building will be approximately 60 feet wide(east to west)by 126 feet long. 12. Building D will be located near the southeast corner of the site. It will contain approximately 9,053 square feet of space. The building will be approximately 60 feet wide(east to west)by 150 feet long. 13. The buildings will have a varied roofline which includes a tower on the grocery and bay dormers on the upper level offices. The buildings will have a colored metal roof trim and horizontal beaded siding. 14. The applicant proposes two driveways in response to Fire Department emergency access needs. A drive aisle providing access to the delivery bay for the grocery store will serve as a fire lane providing access to the rear of the site. 15. The applicant proposes having its delivery,truck loading area and trash bins on the west side of the grocery store directly east of an existing apartment complex. Staff has recommended that noise tests be conducted to assure that the delivery area is not violating noise standards. Noise tests do not necessarily screen out disturbing noises such as backup beepers,engine sounds,trash dumping,etc.that do not violate noise standards but can be disturbing nonetheless. 16. The applicant was concerned that altering the floor plan and"flipping"the location of the grocery and retail space would tuck the retail space into a less visible location. 17. Staff recommended connecting the center to the surrounding residential development if that is acceptable to the residential properties. 18. The applicant proposes landscaping buffers of 15 feet along the north property line and between 5 feet and approximately 20 feet on the west property line. In general,there will be 5 feet of landscaping along the east property line. There will be a 15 foot landscape strip along the frontage of the site. Additional landscaped islands will be located at the beginning of the parking aisles and within the parking aisles. The landscaping will consist of a variety of materials with larger plants and trees I , Carl Colson Olympic Associates Co. Union Plaza Shopping Center File No.: LUA-97-034,SA May 19, 1997 Page 6 proposed along the north arid northwest property lines to buffer the residential uses adjacent to the site in these locations. 19. As noted there will be 346 parking stalls. The majority of the parking will be located in the center of the site with some additional parking along the frontage and at the ends and sides of some of the buildings. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; 1 e. Conservation of property values;- f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. '2. In general,the proposed site plan is well-designed with adequate landscaping,parking and an interesting facade and roof treatment for the,buildings. The location of the loading dock and trash enclosure on the west side of the proposed grocery building and therefore,near the residential units immediately west of the site is the one troublesome aspect of the plan. Both elements,the trash enclosure and delivery area,can create undue disturbances even if they don't violate noise standards and should be relocated to elsewhere on the site. 13. While the applicant is concerned about"hiding"the retail or bagel bakery behind proposed Building A, appropriate signs will reveal it to passersby. In addition,the view angle into the site and the rear of the site should not be that adverse to exposing this facility. In any event,the applicant should not be permitted to foist off the noisiest aspects of this development on the most sensitive surrounding properties,the residential units to the west of the site. While there are also residential units north of the site,the proposed westerly location exposes the most residential units to the detrimental noise impacts of delivery trucks,engine noises,backup beepers and the trash collection and disposal. The recommended condition of testing for noise does not even contain any possible remedy if noise is a problem. Unfortunately,noise standards are defined to minimize injurious noises but don't necessarily reach noises that might be nuisances or disturb the tranquillity expected of residential settings. While urban life requires some compromises in these situations,planning principles generally require avoiding such impacts if possible. Both the trash bin and the delivery bays are situated in the least Carl Colson Olympic Associates Co. Union Plaza Shopping Center File No.: LUA-97-034,SA • May 19, 1997 11Page 7 desirable location on the site and should be moved. While the applicant noted that flipping the floor plan might"hide"the separate retail space, it provides better protection for the residential buildings west of the site. Clearly,using appropriate signing,the retail space can be brought to the attention of shoppers. 4. The shopping center is compatible with the designation of the site for suburban center uses including clustered and stacked retail and office uses. 5. The proposed uses are compatible with the Zoning Code and provide the appropriate setup and meet the height and parking requirements of the City.. Fire and building code compliance will be determined with the submission of actual building plans. 6. The internal pattern and orientation of the buildings coupled with the landscaping and setbacks minimizes impacts on the site. 17. As already noted,the proposed layout would have exposed too many residential properties to the potentially negative impacts of noise from delivery trucks and garbage disposal. Those impacts are unacceptable when "flipping"the floor plan for Proposed Building B would reduce the impacts to the most sensitive surrounding land uses,the residential complex west of the site. 8. The development of the site, as conditioned, should not have a negative:impact on prope4 values. 19. The emergency access driveway as well as the two driveways and fairly rectangular parking arrangement should be efficient vehicular circulation. 10. The two-story height of the highest buildings coupled with the interior parking arrangement and the setbacks should permit adequate light and air to enter the site and surrounding properties. 11. The utility infrastructure and roadways surrounding the site are more than adequate to serve the development. In addition,the ERC has proposed mitigation measures to offset impacts on • transportation corridors and fire safety. 12. In conclusion,with the exception of the delivery and trash enclosure,the proposed site plan appears to provide a positive development for the subject site. DECISION: The site plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall "flip"the floor plan and delivery and trash enclosure plans for Proposed Building B and relocate the delivery area and trash enclosures to the east side of Building B. 2. The applicant shall comply with the ERC mitigation measures. 3. The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide a 20 foot wide clear drive for access around • the building exterior. The revised site plan shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department,prior to issuance of a building permit. Carl Colson Olympic Associates Co. Union Plaza Shopping Center File No.: LUA-97-034,SA May 19, 1997 Page 8 4. The site plan shall be revised to provide a pedestrian walkway across the parking lot,with the location coinciding with the corridor separation between Buildings C and D. The site plan revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division,prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. The applicant shall provide for pedestrian access onto the site from adjacent properties if it is practical. The applicant shall work with Development Services Division staff to identify potential pedestrian connections and shall revise the site plan. The revised site plan,or a written justification as to why it is not practical to accomplish, shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division,prior to issuance of a building permit. ORDERED THIS 19th day of May, 1997. FRED J.KA MAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of May, 1997 to the parties of record: Peter Rosen Larry Cross Neil Watts 200 Mill Avenue South 701 Dexter Avenue N,#301 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98109 Renton,WA 98022 Carl Colson Ricky Chang Stan Piha 701 Dexter Avenue N,#301 3010 77th Avenue SE,#201 2101 4th Avenue,#250 Seattle,WA 98109 Mercer Island, WA 98040 Seattle, WA 98121 Daniel Nieder Helen Rivera I5363 South Kenyon Street P.O.Box 1149 Seattle,WA 98118 Renton,WA 98057 TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of May, 1997 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,PlanBldg/PW Administrator Members,Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Art Larson,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney James Chandler,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Mayor's Executive Assistant Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Pursuant to Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m..June 2.1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact, error in judgment,or the discovery of new (evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review Carl Colson Olympic Associates Co. Union Plaza Shopping Center File No.: LUA-97-034,SA May 19, 1997 Page 9 by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may,after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying'a filing fee of$75.0.0 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. _ If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one).communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. ;All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the.Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. _ ry-F}{ ARCHITECTURE lipleil \\ -MO Timm Y At•I 166, _,IMM.•UMW R'$ KruIR ENGINEERING PLANNING .N • an. Valhi R•8 WEU('.EY NTE A A PelMakiTIRr rnFoer� `fir -- 701 DEXTER AVE.N. TK SITE MEOM!DE"ELOrT•QRl IS WOODED III I I "" '•�'■ 8 •'— AroccNrANeAMIATUMEVALDERD DOLMAS Fps --"„" .i„"'_—` R-I0 I SEATTLE.WA 98109 "'"'-•- AND TAN-LOCK DME TO ExTFWNE SITEUOORC I. (206)tes-�.100 D•.°•t.DE' ~. bE 2HSTIG TREE!COLL EE REMOVED.REFER ' ' K.N.11ElT t'©-— 0 L Y M P I C iA11111 1 LL`OSCAPNi ; TO 7ME TEA L4•DSGAPIG RAN Fde IreweATION I I I I aJ ELM* EM UO LOCATION Or tEU TREo AW PLANT R-24 ;gifRE ER To A'D2VLDre !!•a• '-r nT S. �=-_,•r•m+---� MATERIALS REFER TO CAA.RAN FOR tEll .L�-� - 8 R-I01111111. ASSOCIATES TIC*A STAMG ATO Wf•Wws��IseS•Sf�� ; ; WADNG MO OGMOR 1 Cg1ATM --��..11 NEW CONTOURS*TA RETANIG GNLL! j/%/ /%//�I//////%�'////////%%�%%%A;'''//'., -I . TE Nn l ITTF•ILAU //� / .".'; :•,/ y � C O M A N Y F91 S / �I�1� C oNE uAr To•uDe ERNE AI•A! ' II R-I0 �� • X pi / ..w ,.`;•' "t i EXISTR.6 NEWCCNTCURB-UTILITIES y . '•••�?•-•:Gj'i !R FETERTOTROSAIST6O _ \� UNION PLAZA . •:•'§':., �+ TIOI CN EXIlTIG dT0 RM-G y j /T _ %��%! /�� FEW CONIQR!AND ALL ExI G WALLS n1� Y (TrM T REFER TO cvoL DRAAPG6 Hc _u : P GgMRa N SLO•tool cs ERA•WT3 \\\\\\\ S /-� C� MffOIIIffD I �., y .s DOTER r & OFFI E..,• 1% T/J r.:f'd .� .�,��...�� f nn•ae.i ..A• ,. NI T +:i!*!!*IF�T !.'.._!:-._ e<.s _ C5 3804 NE 4th STREET ,�arr+�r s t `,�:.�4'�.SR4` ]d0 I •CAW y \\ ..a. \ AA s ..� t `� `\ iX F \ a ei r ' ' 4oAT.G :6.11Z sg 4 C9 \ .L s R-10 I �';:V Eo ems r s VICINITY MAP Y ""` 1 , = L• , a SCALE T zoo-o �.' emm' Ma OTT O•scam Wins Q1 SFICA1YN Cl \ \\ - \ Taw souls roorAae a iK e,rt• THAW er. \ \ L. \\� • O' .T •.•' - 6.�vf )XrT.� TOTAL eOLY!Poor AGEOTK... s. SITE PLAN ..\ \ •moo raa .� \ / DALD eP.Q (Lplt AN R • Bums T• SO6 Sr. \ DAD...9• SA+ef. \ f \ - �_ \\+^��\\\\\ 4 RETAA TOTAL NM SP. \•-, \ ' \ 1 SP.TALRANT rAQ • a: �• RESIAAVort TOTAL rhoT SP.. k - -- -- •.-• ].•-O ?\?Q\\\\' DU1DK.T40 o Il.1t SP. .o L.m..X. . �\ _ rTrLecr TOTAL .O,••J SP. rAJILDING "A" I I �' 111 41 I I I I TToTALprocc S.ol POOTAOr LoT °O.OLD S. 'ASSP. 2nd FLOOR ]'� e•ao• 10 `— D ,cmra •• ••� y '/ • • -sacs awl. u� PMCMI MYLTw • } ALL WE SPAceS mama, D. _ - - S % A S CAW•SAW. A•A'•e, - ..CARS S car.ct 16.SP,ACE.1•R7IDm D••e•e+DE I`T;I I P NMDICAP ACCEeeCL!SPACE! T LAIOSC/.PIC• 6 - % IPlIt uac.loo eTAwARDl, evFER �1 ,%/ .i_il/ _%////i/%/ .�' %�•✓i i r/ r.:;eii PA.. 4 W.ACE ToTK !K .-_.__.,,2.t, _S• &ALM FOOTAGE a NTFfaCw LOT LMDIUrlO 1T7.f. EMSIt.G S. ExI$t lG TIANIOLE _ _ __ — �_�—.• e•mat Lie gIAIS FOOTAO!a ALL°1Ot LMOKA HS 30.56.SF. SELLER LINE EXIST.G STORM SYSTEM NE.4TI-1 AVE. • _'+ WT ' ^'•ORDN!wean WO* 1Ell D•SELLER LNe EMMSTIG O• ER LIE rotOPOSED MIDW KWT X.••O• Nell r•O'VA ateueuc R019m eE16AOt. D'•11.OR e••REAR 96016.0 NEW!'•o'RAViNG STRIPFIUPCOED telEADOS A••RUNT D•MDE! mzr--��60 N••REMI 1 SITE PLAN N •• SCALE I. =.o•-o• =, 3 PROJECT DATA 3/14/9? 0935 on cRa RE FUMING IDNAGEMENT At CEXTCR AA.N.lip1/4 EATRE,NA 98109 „.•.• l IH, ,'nllll ID"'"" III III IIIIII IIIIIIII111111111111111111111IIIIUu'"'�mlllll IIIID�"""'IIIII Illu�'' (am)2�4J00 Mk rlllllllllltlllltlllll�IIIN�IIII,�lnlllflllllllll�1111III.11llliilllllllllllllll�dr,IIIIII,l,I„II�I�1111_ .,, ,,,IIIIIIII_IIIIII►IIII��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�INIIIIII.IIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIII►IIII,.._. ., OLY M PIC .7m7 111AM1'I I 5 « ^'!n� ■■ • ASSOCIATES X .. ....,l�lll� -•�.-i. -�=c raaa=°r, :m>I=E.1...r� ■.. _h 11 . C 0 M P A N Y - "- '�I?T�I f='. . •_t.Ir.l�ltt��Ptl= �= ��_,.L...rTT�iti.1,:_F........IL....,_,.....N.ITi.lrI.;N...,, ..' -== _ I11.11.1. L..;..�...�....„-I.��.._.I�..,=N�.Ir1.lr111_ 0111111111111111-- -_----- . , i■1 igr ii i■ INWi lii al ■. ii-` �li Pi i= '■ .'■ ■'_3i ■ i, rl=ii ■I iliiiil-l71il_ mozAtteare 11_: II 11 1 I .- L1 11 1 II II ■ • UNION PLAZA 1 BUILDING "A". FRONT ELEVATION SHOPPING SCALE I/18• = I•-0- CENTER & OFFICES 3904 NE 4th 81" 1w •,...IIIIIIII IIII1IIIIIIIIIIII11IRIIIII��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIgllll,IIIIIII,IIIIIIIIIIIII1III1''�I,I',',_'_,_ •` RENTOI �=IIIIIIIIIIII:!t 1► IP"' i I =a t _____ I_ 'I''''' 01�-�iif�€'lri� : €m'''"2goi'��L - • 8 m=,. fiw�F i I G ALL IECNANICAL EOAFTENr.ILL �•__ - -- - _-_ _ _ _—_- _ a - -- - AREASAR At 1LF AT RDW.A. - 1 II It PPP.k. , .... .____,..... 2 BUILDING "B" FRONT ELEVATION I, SCALE I/IB' = I•-0' Lii'ILE LEASE N AGE I,�...ql w.. I III III III II Iltllw,.. III Illlllallllllll�lhl' 11" I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII,._ _ 11 _____ IIIIIuuIIH .. *'�• • `., .: :.,,,,. ],�®=."T.�>r..=._=1P':7T,_;. . .i1°- —• .@In, a,.a-o=_ =r �'11.=e=s?L.• ro, ■-. �+ `II :II!"1 i i =11=.r, i _II 1 I SiIi h ._ — • - —_--- =-- - BUILDING '1-1' ---. _ _ -_ .. _ - i.fi ii� 411119111 '71G■v=11=..111;;€■ IiE■1■i_i _ — - ELEVATIONS BUILDING "G" BUILDING "D" SCHEMATIC BUILDING SECTION 3 BUILDING "C" & "D" FRONT ELEVATION 4 SHOWING HVAC EQUIP. LOCATION SCALE I/18' = I'-0• SCALE I/B• = I'-D• PINNED PETAL_ROCFPG EN�2' - COLCRTOBEGEENOR l —_ _ _ MEE rem DRAT--\ MOP MG1C � PANTED Elfe.WA SRO t tau PRUNNED PETAL ROOM GEM LL PCATED =OR TO BE GREEN OR PINNED PETAL FIXING OLAZFG MIDI ___ ._-__ __ . y ... TEAS rEtt DRAT CCLCI!TO BE GREEN OR PANTED Elfn ARCH 9 FOOD C--- :' - 1ERE PETAL DRAT LOUT PACE CHI AT ,...avltlfT .. eTZ A '� N ` —UNION PIRG— cn..a.wla-ELu•.:,-I HEMMED DELL FAeCA. FIEFNNED FETAL FASW _ GUTTERS M0 e01FTT -1 arm,*MO ewFIT \ /' PANTED UXO MrtZE WARD C' �_ ®0 �. �_s PANTED FGICO METE BOARD _ Q GEAR EEILATEo fR.ATEG eTeTEn —I,1 �I,I PANTED WA erR ENO -. '- ==t- l 1111 I:111 1111111111111. _, BAH, PANTED EMS.MGR SPLIT FACE Oil ATURECRAFT i JO'S CARDS __ C. -iniLDE _ _ _c i i l=1 i illlll WV FACE au --- _ - \ NEfNNED reTAL AUNN'i pAR,A N' F. ' ,!I! ItEC[aeED FETAL owerour -.. . _ • SPLIT FACE CPU - GEM WLLATED ALAD4 smui =/---- ___ 'f�� —�_ e .:w :r -...`.. RECESSED MET AL oaEePnR 3-= — n T ''_1 y __� ePLttFA[EQ71pETC0 } MI a =1�1 .�,,... 96016 GEM NNA.uED GLAZN'.eT61E11— i i,`yl ='•=i1'PIA_-�C ePltt FACE av -'• � it C lELtt FACE C71 =_=i/,'; —mob. •ii�i G " m :' y�^Jfp TYPICAL BUILDING MATERIALS MATERIAL DESIGNATIONS ARE SHOWN ON PORTIONS OF BUILDING LIT AND -C U. AN /:\ 1 BUILDING DE G •TI USE THE SAME ON PO ROOFING SYSTEM. SPITE FACE B. AND SCALE 1/0' = I'-0" -CLEAR WINDOW GLAZING SYSTEM AS SHOWN IN BUILDING A- AND •B'. • I; uTsr c RErawwG 11•V.Ee1E051 RED CEDAR I I I 15.FRA5C F+.oTwu WALL re�E cIML1 .0EererN no UDAR .. _. 1 , o eEEq---}+. •,"'• 1-DO1•aAe FIR ......_._._._._._.__...._. SPECIFICATIONS -- i I I"I _ cc �'��•__�.�j;�.� L-LRq II ,ow,r7:2k'T..- ..,.....,.. ..._ _ •.. _..._t �:%.5? $ . i GT�P/r � 1.- ---=.-.-..- I I i' I j efe.s-- r r • f-w.c.wK!«lu`� '��liiii '2. a'i�i�i'iu�iiEii�OG:iitv'�iOp.� � .. ......-.w=�....::::..-� I I 8 i I I I ; epEA+ •)oc -- o,n.MM.FIRE• 1l fRAeER RIiOTEWA pppp4/ 1, ..r. -.. I Ii'n.1aD lI..eE . MERIT.1h•0G. v oG Gp�`]_, f w G I G fin:e.Rwwlow..ac' BMW.exp.* FIN 11,_S ....... .....-.-.«..- V it uEATIER ]h'OZ. WLa Il ! \ j!;r ..... �...1, d 1 ) R'MT.DERn [" REUIL I ��% ]s-eROAa ooR L. >:EAR •R.0 RRIDCT CH - 1 I I ..K.o.G-ER TA.'xR•rallz3..ac• •Pe 0DERDR.' n•..r.man w. 1 :7.:^ ��..�:...-. ' •] 'OL- TEATIER•34'OL •)h'OG )]:snewGluoD.wK' - 1 • WWW _ a wE1` i�Oe. ( JE1f/• { _I ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ __ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ `•e/ n CET.eEIa. aiiw 1y J ..�w 1'•d' I C ..., O.«r ever I .� r.Rw.RZAR• ,rs.acoo P.C. R+•Rfi�tt �.�'•17�:':.�.-...2. II cIERRT ]..xi�A.uu*ERER• IELTLER•1h'oG ]F?w+r�`Ae :!•^•'xEA ]•OC. -n.a as uuw.fE• .:!!!r'R'RR•I •... ,.�.� •..r. LAw. I , / � I ,..•.. R1.ODODE]IDRON :� ["y .....-.... •I. �/ D �i I ERE �._.t� ••ar r •ah'OG l.s.OALAL c �' `...-....'^.5_:" 'r'=.�:�' , �I I �r rEte. R'MT eE++0 •T••F 7:fE. R•�.r. m+! _-}e, r'I i' "' •roG ql� . SC.�..':---...-"--....... I! II lI • ' ( l I ijjk I I I 1 I P` * •-4ETEEN AR 1 .-..� y.�`««..... �_ 1 . . ..«...M.wr. .� LLDwG ro• - o to, .r ro•1FLLERI'I+cEL. u:uEeeLAO xue*' Tl.1ELLEIe'I+oLlr �y�+ 11 I )'OG FLOOERE G FEAR •Y OG • I/%rs+' .. _ •...-.._ VY I I I I 1 D•FDICRVGL60 V _ _ • Z _ !I I ! t- I n•ur.IeE�'11---i iT: I I I I I [„ I n•,+T.eEla-:-r`i�f lo:;RlvxlaE• `ri « .._..._..-.�+ODOOEIIDRON , , 0�N I 7 '.(l��1. h oG �.uEerERR ♦ayy� __ _ f ID'I I ' t /� I , I ! i �jiy+.� RED GEDaR I.F�JA) . ...�.-....'r ".•--..... 3 L'FIN 1II -( 1 I• I I �I I I 1 1 I I I I �\,?,.. a. "2- �.. .... J z c._ I I r �.. Z°- RETA L _ ' SA.1ELLEM'MOLLY e1•'A.+nCRT WATERER• 1E.IELLERI'MOLLY • K a.•'CrT ��, 'I / •)'OL. SINFIEA••]'OG ••1.OC. 17•D iL L e G \I ��•• ••?p'• a` 1 `..r•0�r •7�\L ftftftt±tO H I Ia/,�!!a r[ •' f - -, - - 7?••E�• ?9 ;i►t I t�� 17"Er" I. h o I (!�� I �'7' a.a._ r....... • I�-•I,� `n'RT._J ROOEERT RuopoOE.NORwN Ql. •+•s•�_...._ I I 'pm, teal OVIL1 _ •)h•OZ. gQ? I=• �- .I a.s�' 71r.roER•rAuroo PINK' n.•arul.IwxIKE• 0-ruua.+zAM D .EK'.FATTER .s:erRwawoD IMMO Ie+ODODERDRON� G.ERRr q.0e'.'•�'7,� I..•S Reed I I •r1'OC. IFATuER•1h'CC CSL[ \ IIA. "'4a�':: ISAIi!A!AieiA.J1d =_I1 - �DIJgJ�III I II c Y�7IT.- rOJc- y.�/ �/♦ �� - i4 ..a.:-RT�eDe? _._ .4,Lla° Ia fe SI Rt___ ' � ''(!••, I.YE .N6 aLalKA-J x-}I I ►. ,I CEDAR ��•' _ .19 '4S.? II..ROAO5ON' �, �I erhno-. ��II��-' - Wea.RwOawo...c•-✓ ]- aRiEx GJi aa+IrER•roc. ddd /- ]A-Yny FIRE'MEWS-, ..II • L REL : )!•'OM.05CR•2 WINO uEaTMER•]h•OG MAM.E 7P j� 1• LAUREL ,_ • FATTER•74'OG •)4'OG ..1 u.CENKE NIDG Da FEMME AND ETARM PETAL I A'OG 11 •�I I�e1.:KILL �.... - '.I `I/ WILDMG 9� MA:UAW bc11'na L'LD)G'G' .aLdL ]'OG��;��1 •)'OG MT! �SI }____ ]'OG F-SEED E�-F•G ]-DOIGLaI FWR - 'V I. % ,. R'CET.-1_... _ .!•w•ASLR M+OfwIA It.S ADwG ENGLIy1 Au1N . , r T OG FEq EW•) 1 .I .;�Il►\ -'!l' _ ..`. RED ....r... W Fa ill r r N CEDAR •I, I �\ ,�. :R. ....�. ._.�._...•.......a..,_..................a.. ..,.._..r.._... CEDAR - _ = d ] ]1.'r4IDE WEe5TER _ -- • 1,1• ! v. I'� D)••3.s.S•10C il ' l.�..AL.+L I:--].uDAR no / \ .VI. mRO+ •a'oG , 'I •.. e ]'OC. [Du �M RoacERr recE CIVIL/ V PLANT MATERIAL LIST �f .v.-= I; -q.i 1 OTT I eorAwcAL NArs I CPfSW NAER 1 e11E.!PACT. I e. Z W w • ,. ^ a ACER Pa.naru-I GR{ER YAHE•JE HARE 1•GAL.IO'CET,e.p n :P.ER R e1En"et,w+5Er• Tab N]NOEr RED,,APLE 1•GAL,n•.IA•ITT.C.e•10•w.oc t/al'r`ARTIm OCTAL r pts NORTH <, >"`t-I �v. ^ 1 cArtmocAACS.ue I LATH X]TTelZla uEu_0G ALAS..,cczy ',F L.(e"ur.e.e.eR..A4 .LARR on MM. WO n. ----tr-- -- :n-.-- En A- o •�.. •W' 11 PRu057ERALATAtS1 0WAR]AR'FLOUERWii6 G.+ERRi 1'GAL-V'•n' ~'. E ••--• ` .__I Erwar cME 450 DQWA FIR 1'.!•L e.e a• �� ,"„V � Ij•niY104LEnAug1.4�O 56EGr 4l K�A.ID%L[Cr�lLW4 PEAR 1'CAL.+C.n'uT e.P OR•Ah' �O • f'[ „---._ •�_•,..- 1a TN1Ia PLICATA JEerERR RED CEDAR 1.41 ITT,RLy,BM Io' if o T Cr Lli (]•,(/)c 1,]i �x 4•CTOST. OO UVA- PLANT MATERIAL LIST SCALE: I. = 30' W } .o......-• - •'•••.-••'• �i � o r RW 77.7-5 llrx I GAL_eon.•]•OZ. 1 orr.I eoTATWCAI AVEu I eO++G.r I.A^F I elzE.sRAC e. I U '-0 III 1 UI .tea ieu cAi'EA'A(.LO( o.wc OALAL DOD PE..I.EaT.ER I GAL.COST.•By OC. ,,. .�., $ jis. GAIZTIFRL eTALLOT !`A_AL I GAL.co.r.•)•oG 10 FRwnOE 0LER'5Ie.KRBCIAT,10 oro Lane••Via, L ]r., TT,e.D•a Oc .c.w..o.Rn 57i I II.E0c 0.ara(SELLERD'ORD'LEELIRD'ORD'DaiLILT IG.Y.CW�pL. 3S Ru00005TORIOi'Yiw KR15GiVA•IR RRi1Gw[E'ii.5.CDODC0RDI 71'•).-ur,eIR•si OL I` s 0 Sheet,Ye�••••^•- 1:]_LER G025 543'uELLERI' 1FLLERI'TOR A ]GAL.COW.•3.r OG i )A 4.0..00E Wiv2S. DE.E0.lTER''rRp[aE ot-ro•IOIODODEMMaT 1r.7.• ••].OC 3. � , ao♦in n .i .r JAAFEIa»laewi eroAvroc eROAo.+od•JwWrER !Gal.COST.r•OZ. �i ercvi•Iu Tx a osivas puura rnla !SAL.ccwr.•i•CC 31..v... ., "O Z L-1 FATRM TMJUD RAMTaA OVAL ]V1 I.!Fwprwla FRAM. FRASER M+OTw1a )O W.COST,•!'OL. 320 YRaE•A OJ4Da•]MICA WIN,/'ARTI+O1T WATERER IMREA 1 G.Y.COO.•]'Oc sI`B Cl+ Q Mtl 16 PERM JAPONICA 1•IM tin TPT.I t0a'MERI! 71•-1.•CET.DTD.)'•1'OG b TAN!DACGA RE..npEN! ePIeAD.0 i3.isu Yew e••Io'WPM.•3S'OC J ,i • On the Bib day of f , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States,'a sealed envelope containing N ear�no� EXavv WItIr* - documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Carl . Celsovr O(LiY,n,Pic. Assoc. Covx awH tZtc.Ac..�.� Onayn� hortin wtsX V'v mciTet�s 1 St a.r• ena. R c S "ZhV@s11MeKit eapnaK 1 HelevN 'R%vzva. 12. F G "Xvw.cA nnevtt• DaY,te.l Y1 ve-de r" (Signature of Sender) wdvA. k• SeGoovee' STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) ,/ / _ _ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 5/14/ ,p,4 L CCU. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the'`,u:��3..an'd..purposes mentioned in the instrument. '• Dated: 6/1 '% 0.e ',• Notary Publi i and fortr-State of Was,Iirigiphivlpl' r . Notary (Print) �1/-g /2-- r ,!%2 Gt;1, 4� My appointment expires: 0 /qe „� I Project Name: • kiv‘, Pla'Lo`. S`norrivk Cep Fes' Project Number: LUP` q1_O 314,SA,EC NOTARY.DOC • .W'•isi•i}iiiiiiiiiii:h:0:•::•isvLviiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilii:•i:::v:v'ii:iiiii}}}}}iiiiiiiiii}iiii:4:vi:::v::::•)}}}}}i: TON>:MUNICI.::ALB : I Q N' ':< <» >><>>» C. : .NCI :.GWAMBERS .:.S..ECQ[VD:FLOO..;.`»�tENT+D.::.: U :::: � ..::: �1. ::.:.: G::::::::::::::::::::::.::::. << :::: .:..:a�• licatior�s aiste'd>ire:>frt<or;;ferofapplication::�.................... .....n.....t�................. ........ .............::..:::::::::.�. .... Items:>w,th:>be tled:::far: eaten ::at the:::discret� rt:::of::the::Hearin':::Examiner:>::::>::::>::::>::::>::::::::>::><::«<:»::: �:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::.::::. ' PROJECT NAME: UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-034,SA,ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of four(4) buildings for a total area of 80,496 square feet with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. Location: 3904 NE 4th Street. AGNDA.DOC City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: May 13, 1997 Project Name: Union Plaza Shopping Center Applicant Contact/ Carl Colson Address: Olympic Associates Co. 701 Dexter Avenue N,#301 Seattle, WA. 98109 Owner/ Ricky Chang Address: Northwest Prompters 3010 77th Avenue SE, Suite 201 Mercer Island, WA. 98040 File Number: LUA-097-034 Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Description: The applicant is seeking site plan approval for a retail shopping center and offices. The proposal includes 4 buildings for a total building area of 83,496 square feet. 346 parking spaces are proposed. Access would be via 2 driveway entries off NE 4th Street. Project Location: 3904 NE 4th Street a — - NE ith MT \\\— --- r'itAa� a.� _=Lle6thpt, � r�61�im6th FLAGS =LI•n -Q�111 a n F miN R-8 Maki, MI I 1 R-10 I I 11 1j481_, NE 6th STREET R-8 - ime R-10 R-24 Co 1 RM-I R-10 I NE5thSTREET R-10 Lll Rh1-c \SITE - z CS 1 n I- NE 4th STREET Cs R-8 CS I NE 3rd ACE 1 City of Renton PB/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner ' UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034, SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 2 of 12 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Ricky Chang, Northwest Prompters 2. Zoning Designation: Center Suburban (CS) 3. Comprehensive Plan Center Suburban(CS) Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: Vacant, undeveloped 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single family residences, Village on Union East: Commercial, vacant, Puget Power Substation South: Commercial, Eastway Center West: Multi-family apartments 6. Access: NE 4th Avenue 7. Site Area: 5.85 acres, 254,698 s.f. 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: N/A New Building Area: 83,496 s.f. Total Building Area: 83,496 s.f. C. HIS TORICAIJBACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation 2290 11/21/66 Comprehensive Plan 4498 2/20/95 Zoning Code 4405 6/7/93 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: Water: Watermain extension, fire hydrants and DDCV assembly's will be required to meet current fire codes/regulations. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hewing Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 3 of 12 Sewer: Extension of sanitary sewer system will be required to proposed buildings. Surface Water/Storm Water: Storm drainage facilities will be required in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City. 2. Fire Protection: Provided as per City of Renton Ordinance 3. Transit: Metro Transit provides service along NE 4th Street and Union Avenue NE. 4. Recreation: Kiwanis Park is located within one-half mile of the subject site. 5. Other: Site is located within Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Zoning Code-4-31-10.2 Suburban Center Zone 2. Parking and Loading Ordinance-4-14 F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element—Centers —General Policies: Policy LU-82 -- Promote the clustering of Center uses and discourage the development of strip commercial areas. Policy LU-89 — Create Centers which support a citywide transit system and encourage pedestrian access. 2. Land Use Element—Centers —Mix and Intensity of Uses: Objective LU-Q -- Encourage a wide range and combination of uses, developed at sufficient intensity to maximize efficient use of land, support transit use and crate an urban district. Policy LU-97 --Encourage multi-story office, commercial and multi-family uses. Policy LU-98 --Discourage single story suburban style development. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034, SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 4 of 12 Policy LU-100 -- Mixed development within the same structure should include uses which are compatible with each other, i.e. office and certain retail uses with residential; office and retail; light industrial; and heavy commercial. 3. Land Use Element—Centers —Site and Building Design: Policy LU-102 — Site and building design and use should be oriented primarily toward pedestrian/people to maximize pedestrian activity and minimize automobile use for circulation within the center. Policy LU-103 — Existing residential and commercial development should be integrated as much as possible through alterations in parking lot design, landscapes, signage, and site plan alterations as redevelopment opportunities occur. 4. Land Use Element--Centers —Circulation and Parking: Policy LU-108 --Vehicular circulation should be internal and access to adjacent streets should be consolidated. 5. Land Use Element--Centers —Center Suburban: Objective LU-T -- Develop suburban centers which provide a wide range of consumer goods and services to an area which includes neighborhoods, but is smaller than the entire city. Policy LU-119 — Suburban center sites and structures should be more intensive in design and intensity (e.g. signage; building height, bulk and set-back; landscaping; parking) than with land uses outside the Center. Policy LU-120 -- Promote the clustering of community commercial uses and discourage the development of strip commercial areas. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant requests site plan approval for a retail shopping center with second floor offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total floor area of 83,496 square feet. The building • layout faces toward the interior parking area. Building A is oriented along a north/south axis on the west part of the site. Building A includes approximately 17,182 square feet of retail space and 9,287 square feet of restaurant space on the first floor, with 9,916 square feet of office area on the second floor. Building B is setback farthest from NE 4th Avenue at the north end of the site and parking lot. Building B is proposed to include a 22,427 square foot grocery store and 5,018 square feet of retail area on the first floor and approximately 3,000 square feet of second story office space over the retail portion of the building. Buildings C and D are oriented north/south along the east property line, with a 20 foot wide corridor separating the buildings. Building C is proposed as a 7,613 HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034, SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 5 of 12 square foot restaurant and Building D a 9,053 square foot restaurant. The maximum building height would be the 37 foot roof peak of the tower on Building B. Access to the shopping center is proposed via two driveway entries off NE 4th Avenue. These driveway cuts are separated by approximately 165 feet. The shopping center includes a total of 346 parking spaces to serve all the businesses. Sidewalks in front of all the buildings provide for pedestrian circulation through the shopping center. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on April 15, 1997 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated. 3 COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the following mitigation measures were issued for the Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated. 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $41,857.92. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $142,068.00 (1,894.24 trips x $75 = $142,068.00). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. 3. The Construction Mitigation Plan shall be revised to restrict haul hours to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The revised Construction Mitigation Plan shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of Construction Permits. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-31-33 (D.) "The Hearing Examiner and City staff shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Heating Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 6 of 12 discourage creativity and innovation. The site plan Review criteria include, but are not limited to, the following:" GENERAL CRITERIA: (1) CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS & POLICIES The proposed shopping center is located within the Center Suburban (CS) Comprehensive Plan designation and generally conforms:to applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the CS designation. The objective of the CS designation (LU- T) encourages a wide range of consumer goods and services to serve neighborhoods, with a service area smaller than the entire city. The community commercial uses should be clustered to discourage development of strip commercial areas (Policy LU-119). Center Suburban sites should be more intensive in design than land uses outside the Center. The shape of the subject site is narrow and long, so the buildings are oriented facing inward to the parking area. This building layout gives the shopping center an interior focus, and together with the consolidated driveway entries, distinguishes the proposal from commercial strip development. The proposal appears to incorporate smaller commercial uses within the buildings, scaled to serve neighborhood.needs. The project proposes second story offices over Building A and B which is consistent with the intensity and mix of uses envisioned for the CS designation. The building design incorporates varied roof lines and materials that are compatible with residential styles and appropriate for the character of a neighborhood commercial center. (2) CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS The following requirements and development standards contained in Section 4- 31-10.2 Center Suburban Zone (CS) of the Zoning Code (adopted June 1993] are applicable to this proposal Permitted Uses The subject site is zoned Center Suburban (CS). The proposed retail and restaurant uses are allowed as primary permitted uses in the CS zone. General office uses are permitted in the CS zone as secondary uses subject to the following conditions: 1) Size and location of these uses will be reviewed as part of site plan approval; 2) The total gross square footage of these uses shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the gross square footage of the site. The proposal includes office uses on the second floor of Buildings A and B. Thus, retail and restaurant uses which are considered primary uses of the zone would be predominant in the proposal. A total of 12,916 square feet of office use is proposed which is equal to 5% of the gross square footage of the site. The office use complies with the conditions specified for office secondary uses in the CS zone. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Healing Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034, SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 7 of 12 The applicant has revised the site plan legend indicating the square footage of the various uses proposed for the shopping center. This information is attached to the Hearing Examiner report. Size-The CS zone limits the maximum gross floor area of any single commercial use on a site to 65,000 gross square feet. Building B is the largest building in the proposed shopping center with a gross floor area of 30,445 square feet. Setbacks The CS zone requires a front/street building setback of.a minimum of 10 feet and a maximum of 15 feet. The Building A is setback approximately 87 feet from NE 4th Street and Building D approximately 96 feet. The code allows the reviewing official to modify the maximum setback standard through the site plan review process if the applicant can demonstrate that the site plan meets criteria as set forth in the code. The applicant has submitted a letter to justify their design exceeding the maximum setback requirement, and this letter is attached to the project report. The site plan criteria for exceeding the maximum setback follows: 1) Orient the development to accommodate the pedestrian and create a pedestrian environment through such measures as; providing pedestrian walkways, encouraging pedestrian amenities and supporting alternatives to Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) transportation, and; In a revised .site plan, the applicant has proposed a pedestrian connection linking Buildings A and D to the sidewalk along NE 4th Street. However, there is no pedestrian circulation proposed through the parking lot. The overall layout of the shopping center would encourage customers to centrally park and walk between stores, creating an internal pedestrian environment consistent with Center policies. 2) Create an attractive and interesting streetscape with a strong and defined streetfront through such measures as; promoting visible landmarks, fostering distinctive architecture, mitigating the visual dominance of extensive and unbroken parking along the streetfront and modifying building orientation to offset large setbacks (e.g. using varied setbacks, locating separate smaller buildings near the streetfront), and; The applicant has proposed a landscape strip along the street frontage which is a code requirement and landscape islands along the front edge of the parking area, in order to provide a visually appealing streetscape and to break up the,visual dominance of the parking area. The application did not include elevations of the sides of Buildings A and D which face toward NE 4th Street. These facades could be detailed to provide visual interest to better connect the buildings to the street. 3) Promote safety and visibility through such measures as; discouraging the creation of hidden spaces, minimizing conflict between pedestrians and traffic and ensuring adequate setbacks to accommodate required parking and/or access that could not be provided otherwise. The design of the pedestrian sidewalk connecting to the Buildings A and D crosses a narrow traffic aisle width and is well designed to minimize conflicts between pedestrian access and traffic. The Code also allows the Hearing Examiner to modify the maximum setback requirement if the applicant can demonstrate that the preceding criteria cannot be met; however,those criteria which can be met shall be addressed in the site plan: ' HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Heating Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034, SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 8 of 12 1) due to factors including but not limited to the unique site design requirements or physical site constraints such as sensitive areas or utility easements;or 2) one or more of the criteria would not be furthered or would be impaired by compliance with the maximum setback;or 3) any function of the use which serves the public health, safety, or welfare would be materially impaired by the required setback. The applicant claims that Building D exceeds the..maximum:setback to provide an adequate setback from an existing building on adjacent property,just east of the site. The existing building is almost adjacent to the lot line and the greater setback is required in order not to undermine the adjacent building or construct a large retaining wall. No rear or side/interior setbacks are required for development in the CS zone. Special Setback Requirement - The subject site abuts a R-10 zone along the north boundary of the site. The code requires a minimum 15 foot setback with sight-obscuring landscaping where a CS lot abuts a residential zone. The proposal includes the required landscape setback in compliance with the code provision. The setback is planted with Douglas Fir and Western Red Cedar on approximately 18 feet on-center spacing, with Salal as a groundcover/shrub layer planted 3 feet on-center. This planting should provide sufficient cover to meet the sight-obscuring objective of the code. Height - The CS zone allows a maximum building height of.50 feet. The proposal complies with the height limit. The maximum building height would be the 37 foot roof peak of the tower on Building B. Building A would have.a'maximum building height of approximately 35 feet. The other buildings are proposed with lower heights. Lot Coverage - Maximum allowable lot coverage for buildings in the CS zone is 65%. The proposal would result in lot coverage of approximately 24% of the lot area, well below the maximum allowed. Parking Requirements-The City's Parking and Loading Ordinance allows for a range of required parking in shopping centers that applies to all commercial and office uses within the shopping center. The code requires a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. The proposal includes a total floor area of 83,496 square feet. Thus, a minimum of 334 and a maximum of 417 parking spaces are required by the code. The proposal includes a total of 346 parking spaces which is within the allowable range. Landscaping- Lots abutting public street in the CS zone are required to provide a minimum landscape strip of 10 feet. The applicant is proposing a 15 foot wide landscape strip along NE 4th Street, complying with the code standard. The landscape strip is includes an 18 inch high grass berm planted with Red Maple street trees spaced 30 feet on-center. The landscape strip is backed with 'Otto Luyken' Laurel shrubs. The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires that large parking lots over 10,000 square feet in size have a minimum of 5% interior landscaping. The proposal includes 7,772 square feet of interior parking lot landscaping which appears to meet the code requirement according to staff analysis. The landscape plan (Sheet L-1) includes a legend specifying the selected plantings, quantities, size and spacing. The landscape plan is appropriate for the site and the proposal. HEXRPT.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 9 of 12 (3) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES; The subject site abuts undeveloped residential property to the north (zoned R-10) and an existing apartment development on the west (Renton Crown Apartments). Building B is oriented with the back of the building toward the north property line, essentially buffering the north residential property from activities and traffic impacts of the shopping center. In addition, a landscape buffer required by the code along the north property line should be sufficient to mitigate impacts to future residential development north of the site. The truck loading area and trash area is proposed on the west side of Building B, facing the adjacent apartment development. There are concerns'about noise impacts with the loading and trash area in proximity to the adjacent residential use. The applicant has proposed a 20 foot wide densely planted landscape buffer which would assist in mitigating potential impacts. In order to further mitigate potential noise impacts, staff recommends that the applicant record a covenant that would require a noise test to be conducted if there are reasonable complaints about noise from surrounding residences. This was also applied as condition of approval on the expansion of the Safeway store on Union and NE 4th Street. The subject site is adjacent to commercial development on other sides and would not adversely impact those surrounding properties. (4) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED.SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; The proposal would create an intensive commercial use on a site which is presently undeveloped and densely forested. This conversion of the site to a commercial development is not an impact that can be effectively mitigated. However, the proposal is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. The proposed site plan does not create adverse impacts on-site. There is adequate vehicular and pedestrian circulation within the site. A stormwater detention and water quality system will be required to meet City standards. (5) CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES; The proposed commercial development would likely conserve or strengthen area-wide property values. The site and building design complements existing development and provides a cohesive shopping center development. (6) . SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION; Vehicular access to the shopping center is proposed via 2 driveways off NE 4th Street. Customer and employee circulation onto the site and within the parking lot area appears to function adequately. There is a truck loading dock and trash area proposed on the west side of Building B. This narrows the one-way drive aisle around the perimeter of the buildings to an 18 foot width. The Fire Department requires a 20 foot wide clear drive for access around the HEXRPT.DOC I , • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 10 of 12 building exteriors. The applicant should revise the site plan to provide a 20 foot drive width to meet Fire Department standards. As mentioned previously, the applicant is proposing walkways from the sidewalk along NE 4th Street following the fronts of Buildings A, C, and D. An east/west pedestrian connection across the interior of the parking area would improve pedestrian circulation through the site. Staff recommends that the site plan be revised to provide a pedestrian walkway across the parking lot, with the most appropriate location coinciding with the corridor separation between Buildings C and D. There may be opportunities to provide for pedestrian access onto the site,from adjacent properties, rather than requiring pedestrians from surrounding properties to enter the shopping center only from the sidewalk.along NE 4th Street. For example, there may be a practical connection to the Renton Crown Apartments located just west of the site. Staff recommends that the applicant provide pedestrian connections from adjacent properties if practical. (7) PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; The proposed building heights, setbacks and landscaping are appropriate for the provision of adequate light and air. The parking lot landscaping includes Flowering Cherry and Flowering Pear trees which would provide for limited shade once established, but for the most part, the appearance would be an open parking lot accentuated with landscaping. (8) MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; Noise, dust and odors may result with construction of the project. These impacts would be mitigated through measures described in.the Construction Mitigation Plan and with best management practices. The operation of the shopping center uses is not expected to create harmful or unhealthy conditions. Potential noise impacts of truck loading on adjacent residential uses have been considered and staff recommends that the applicant be required to conduct a noise test if there are reasonable complaints about noise from surrounding residences. (9) AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE; AND The project site is adequately served by utilities and roads necessary to accommodate the proposed shopping center. Police and Fire have indicated that adequate resources exist to serve the proposed uses. A previous report section provides further detail concerning availability of public services and facilities: HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034, SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 11 of 12 (10) PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The proposal would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight by improving an undeveloped parcel with a shopping center that is scaled to serve the neighborhood. The site and building design would complement surrounding development and would improve the aesthetic quality of the area. • HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034, SA,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 13, 1997 Page 12 of 12 H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Union Plaza Shopping Center File No. LUA-97-034,SA, ECF subject to the following conditions: (1) Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to complywith the Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination, prior to the issuance of a building permit. (2) The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide a 20 foot wide clear drive for access around the building exterior. The revised site plan shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department, prior to issuance of a building permit. (3) An east/west pedestrian connection across the interior of the parking area would improve pedestrian circulation through the site. The site plan shall be revised to provide a pedestrian walkway across the parking lot, with the location coinciding with_the.corridor separation between Buildings C and D. The site plan revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of a building permit. (4) The applicant shall provide for pedestrian access onto the site from adjacent properties if it is practical. The applicant shall work with. Development Services Division staff to identify potential pedestrian connections and shall revise the site plan. The revised site:plan, or a written justification as to why it is not practical to accomplish, shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to issuance of a building permit. (5) The applicant shall record a covenant that would require a noise test to be conducted if there are reasonable complaints from surrounding residents concerning the truck loading area on the west side of Building B. The covenant shall be approved by the Development Services Division and/or the City Attorney prior to recordation. The covenant shall be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. HEXRPT.DOC Atchih;cnue•EngineeAng•Value Engineering•Canshuction Management 701 Dexter Avenue North 1301 Seattle,Washington 98109 Tel: (206)2854300 DEVELOPMENT P,gaJ;l,n` Fuc (206)285 4371 CITY Or o l Y M P i c E rnal esmtl.com AJSU(IATES APR c 11 M PA NY ECE1 VEL April 9, 1997 Peter Rosen Project Manager City of Renton Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,Washington 98055 Re:Union Plaza Shopping Center Site Plan Approval LUA97-034,SA,BCF 3904 NE 4th Street Renton,Washington Dear Peter, Thank you for promptly returning my call inquiring as to whether or not any additional information would be required for our submittal for Site Plan Approval for this project.Per your request for clarifications on parking,building use,and setbacks,I have revised our site plan drawing to show the correct building use and parking analysis. With regard to the setbacks at the front property line,existing adjacent site conditions and fire department requirements made us realize that Building"A"and Building"D"should be located farther away from the property line(at the street)than the distance that the City of Renton Zoning Regulations requires. Building"D"is set back a distance of approximately 96'-0"from the property line,while Building"A"is set back approximately 86'-10"from the front property line.We preferred to locate Building"D"closer to the front property line,however we were prevented from doing this because of the close proximity of a retail building(on the adjacent site to the east) to the property line.The adjacent property to the cast slopes toward our site and the existing retail building on that site is located extremely close(I to 2 feet away)from the shared property line.Had we located Building"D" closer to the front properly line,we would have risked undermining the existing adjacent buildings foundation and we would have been required to create a very large retaining wall at this area, We felt that by locating Building"I)"in its present location,we would eliminate the undermining danger and this would reduce the visual impact that a large retaining wall would have on the street view of our property.It is my understanding that the reason for the City of Renton's setback requirement is to help create a more pedestrian"friendly" and visually appealing strcetscape.To meet this goal,we have located landscape islands all along the front edge of our parking lot,both at the street(as required)and at the front edge of our main parking field In addition,we will add sidewalks and landscaped areas at the front of our property at both Building"A"and Buis "D"to create a more visually appealing and easier site access for pedestrians to our buildings. At Building"A",we located our building in its present location to meet the City of Renton Fire Department's requirement for fire truck access to all sides of this building.In order to"soften"the visual impact that a parking lot would create at this area,we have located landscaping peninsula's at each end of the parking area immediately south of Building"A",In addition, our landscape architect has place an 18" high berm(with planting)at the landscaped area adjacent to the front property line.This planting material on this berm is identified on the landscaping legend as 12 to 14 feet high red maple trees and • c•.r•a PPP•nu Wd20:2 L66T '6 'ZIdU • 2 feet high laurel.We feel that this landscaping will create a visually appealing edge/screen to the parking lot area which was created by the Fire Department's requirement for access to all sides of Building"A". In talking with you earlier,you mentioned that our Site Plan Approval would be viewed more favorably by members of the Environmental Review Committee if we were to improve pedestrian access to the buildings on the site.Enclosed is a copy of the partial plan that shows the new sidewalks and planting areas that have been added per your suggestion.I have also eliminated a parking space in front of Building"C"and Building"D"and have added an access walkway from the parking lot to the central part of each building.I have also enclosed a partial plan which shows this revision.I have included a revised Project Data chart which shows the correct number of parking spaces and the parking ratios which were used in calculating the required number of spaces.The original Project Data did not include the 3,000 square,feet Office area at the upper level of Building"B"and this revised Project Data Chart correctly shows this revision. Peter,I hope that this letter communicates our intentions for varying from the setback requirements,as well as our efforts to create the visually appealing streetscape that the City of Renton desires for property in this building zone.Please contact me if you need revised Site Plans which show all of the revisions mentioned above.If I can be of any further assistance,please feel free to contact me,Thank you very much. Best • •gards, C. J.Colson AIA CJC/tbm • �� .,. Wd20:2 L66I•6 .eldd . • , . . , Q r \ , .. r \ I I I I . 1 I 1"::-"::.:::::::::::::. lE) i •—•••— -----•-•'•—•- ...... _. ......... 1 • _...„` • '.• tp.1A IFS lint ss / , I • t ra;tit •.,:s., .11,4 ., , .... ,,... . .. .., , 1 . .... --,,,,,,..•., . \ \: , \ \. -,\\\\,,,..,. .\, ,\`\\�\`\--:\- . 11 ..-.. . ,.."\!:., „s\.,.,,\. ---.--:r , „.,\ ...-...,, - ...- /1 COMPACT \\\\\`;\\``\ \`•�\`�\ _ COMPACT '�•�� \,\ .1:•• COMPACT \`:•\\\��, \�\• \\� �/ N (; ; V N \ \ \*. :::-.V. .1.-i:/ COMPACT •• \\' \ \•\\ .'✓ \\ \ \\`�\�\\\\\ ..........,;,1 I- • COMPACT \\ \ \\' 111 1 _ , ' I . s.„,, •„„ ,.,......\..„.„.•,\y„.„.„.. .... _ , ', 6%J A125 31 CAR5 ' ,\�\\\\.,\\\\`.\ '-' • 9'x2�� 9'x20' `s.-NN i \: \� :_. i • COMPACT 11 .\<`.. '; •\•• \�.\ \\\` % t:. i . \•\. 0''��\\\\\ • ✓,. = ... .. . .. ........... COMPACT \ . \ �\ \\\ '▪ j Q COMPACT 1 \\.• \` ` \\ `\\ •"▪ /� COMPACT II L '�1` :vt •: ; coM acr \ '\ \ • \\\\ :�\ i - =IMPACT \' \`\ \`\ ' =- 7; • •_, arc. wd2 :z L66T .6 'add • . • . . •,- 7 . L • s) r) T) D r . .•sAs•; 11 I awAcy 1 1.:Au ..,•\',„:..\\..s.:,,,\..,.. .N.:•• , — „___„___ —.--.— --. .--- ••\• i::.." H \ s‘N \ • \A -,.. (_,.•z "‘‘'\:•\\\sk..: I . COINCT 1 .:\s\ s:::\s•z\NS:.•\::,\\\*S\IN. ,—. ... 41 .1..... ... ..... ..... ..r . 1 .\\ s \ • g:•/: 1 . •\s \\ 1 4 7011.1241 1 Z' 'CV 1N•\. 1 V , 2r -0"--r-7 241-0'/ 1 '4e--ef. ,241-017tr:72•4-0 -s• s\. \ , 41—i f"-----{ ,(...; , ,:‘,.%- s,. •. ..,.. :.,: , ___ • i-N- I I X \ \. •:• i -.....1. ,. . sW• k..'• ::::: .i ., Ifilbtlialii.M.Mil..':*: le<151 Pr: .I, . mai. . ...• :.::: :...:•:....: 1 •—41 •::::;...",:./,4 MX HG 11 g I 4 :'•:::::::g.:•:.::::: Y \ e...i.....::•:::•::i16::::.::::::;:::::p.::) PAg raMED1117--' , L644 kti ITTPJ • ••••••••••••••.10. 0.3.:.:..:..ii......:.:.:..::......::.:.:.:,:s.:....i.,0 ,::......,,,.. ...7..x..e. .......... :.::::::4i ?...: \. .... 0. gal . 1, :•:;:::.....U:•'::•IEF4,7,:, •,, . • CARS --- ••••----I - --- -,CUTER nakx= -• ce, .1.,:y;• . 4 9 ;t. s— WW . 6; CARs eir .•: ..1 •t 1 BI, •:•::: ' G ' ii •• 8 ARS 7 \ ;t 1 A.el bo_ " CARS ..: $ \ \ Cs4 S CAR5 e 91x20) 8-1° x "2 r4 COIP• T I itc2 I . ....... \ \ 14 e ....::•..., .•- 1 I 'i•Y: . • ::•••••••• 0 321-0" 54 1 4• - 1 • :::::::::::'.' # / ,o ,, .• /, / ./ :::•/, . /1 /2/..:/ '/'/•• .-• .•. 1 17.2?7;/':.•// ///-1///1/ 1 77"/'‘Z.1. / r: f/ /••?•------ EL1• .77-/:P.4.•/• • '•fr• • 114. a ,/r/ 1M:%/. ;%.7/*V-41.,:;.AVir 1"l'i ' / 411E.-w•igi,(4(..,/ , ... 1— wilia. ,_ .. . . . . . , • -,......--- kW tr--- . . . • . I-10LE — 7 _...... —I — Ir __ NEW 8° SEWER LINE — . )RVI SYSTEM N.E. 411-1 AvE. . \ NEW " SELER LINE EXISING I21' WATER LINE E cn t3 a_ —4. • m . m -0' WIDE SIDEWALK _ • N • . -0' PLANTING STRIP N cn m • M CC a_ 4 CC I-JP- • On- OF RENTON ZONING CLASSIFICATION • CS _TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE BITE: 254,698 SF. TOTAL eauARE FOOTAGE OF THE 13UILDINGS: }DETAIL SPACE BUILDING "A" 11,182 SF. BUILDING "5" 5,018 5F. RETAIL TOTAL 22200 5F• OFFICE SPACE BUILDING "A" 9,916 SF. BUILDING "5" 3,000 SF. OFFICE TOTAL 12,916 SF. RESTAURANT SPACE BUILDING "A", 5281 SP. BUILDING "C" 1613 S.F. BUILDING "D" 9,053 SF. RESTAURANT TOTAL 25,953 SF. PROCERY SPACE BUILDING "B" 22,421 5F. PROJECT TOTAL 83,496 5F. TOTAL. 6GMARE FOOTAGE OF 13LPG.FOOTPRINTS: 61,293 Si:. [PERCENTAGE E OP LOT COVERAGE: 24% PARlC1NCs ANALYSIS wI� lN SPACE INCLUDED WI a OPPGC CENTER PARKIN SHALL BE THAT FOR A SHOPPING CENSER.OUR PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE BUSED UPON BE 1LEEN 4 AND B SPACES PER THOUSAND SCARE FEET OF SPACE. 83,496 SF. DIVIDED 137 1000 = 83.496 83.496 TIMES 4 SPACES PER TWOUSANP = 334 SPACES REQ. FULL SIZE SPACES PROVIDED 312 (9'-0" x 20'-0") COMPACT SIZE SPACES PROVIDED 23 (8'-6" x 16'-0") HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SPACES (PER W.A.C. 5120 STANDARDS) PARKING SPACE TOTAL 342 (4.1 SPACES PER 1000 SF.) SQUARE FOOTAGE OP INTERIOR LOT LANDSCAPING; 1,112 SF. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ALL OTHER LANDSCAPIAKs 30981 SF. ALLOWABLE EUlL1 ING HEIGHT 501-0" PROPOSED F UILDING HEIGHT 36'-0" REQUIRED SETBACKS 15' m FRONT 15' w SIDES 15' * REAR PROPOSED SETBACKS S5' s FRONT 15' Q SIDES 35' REAR cic-1 OPR'ON WdP0:2 L661'6 .Z1dti • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-034,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT NAME: Union Plaza Shopping Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total'area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3904 NE 4th Avenue LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The 115 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on May 06, 1997. Written comments and requests for reconsideration shall be forwarded to Development Services Division, Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington, on May 13, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval (SA). If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. PUBLICATION DATE: April 21, 1997 DATE OF DECISION: April 15, 1997 SIGNATURES: 79j1 1," tib /7/ Gregg Zir Ferm , AdrYiinistrator DATE De arttm�nf annin /Buildin /Public Works P 9 9 r7 S Chastain, Administrator D Community Service Departme7.nt % Lee,Wheeler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-034,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT NAME: Union Plaza Shopping Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3904 NE 4th Avenue MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $41,857.92. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $142,068.00 (1,894.24 trips x $75 = $142,068.00). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. 3. The Construction Mitigation Plan shall be revised to restrict haul hours to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The revised Construction Mitigation Plan shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of Construction Permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NQTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-034,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT NAME: Union Plaza Shopping Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3904 NE 4th Avenue Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING 1. Soils report does not contain the analysis for potential for liquefaction as required by the Uniform Building Code, 1994 Edition. Addendum is required. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flows for each building are: Building A-4,500 GPM, Building B- 5,250 GPM, Building C- 3,500 GPM, Building D- 3,250 GPM. The primary fire hydrant for each building is required to be within 150 feet of the building. Additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of each building at the rate of one hydrant for each 1,000 GPM of required fire flow or portion thereof. For example, Building B would require 6 hydrants; one within 150 feet and 5 additional hydrants within 300 feet. 2. The fire flow for Building B may not be available in the watermains serving this area. If not, the type of construction can be changed to lower the required fire flow. The preliminary fire flows were calculated on type V N construction. 3. Sprinkler systems are required in Buildings A and B. Building C and D may be required to be sprinklered if they are serving alcohol and have over 5,000 square feet of undivided floor area. Fire alarm systems will be based on the actual use of the building. 4. Separate plans and permits are required by the Fire Department for sprinkler, fire alarm system and hood suppression systems for restaurants. PLAN REVIEW Water Watermain extension, fire hydrants and DDCV assembly's (building, fire control systems will be required and must meet current fire codes/regulations. Water meters for domestic/irrigation will be required sized to meet UPC requirements. Water system development charges (SDC) fees of$0.113 per square foot of gross site area will be required. Transportation Street improvements- NE 4th Street has existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and street lights. New access driveways to the site will be required and they must meet current City Codes/Standards. Sanitary Sewer The Site will require an extension of the sanitary sewer system to reach the proposed buildings within the site. Side sewer connections will be required and the cost is$80 per connection. Sanitary sewer(SDC) fees will be required at$0.078 per square foot of gross site area. Storm Drainage The site will require a storm drainage and temporary erosion control plan with design in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City. Detention/biofiltration will be required via a drainage swale, pond or wet vault. Surface water(SDC) fees will be required at $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface on the site. POLICE The highest number of commercial burglaries and thefts are from construction sites. Police recommend that the applicant fence in the lot with security fencing while the site is under construction, and use security lighting as well. Tools will need to have the model and serial numbers recorded,to aid in recovery if they are stolen. If a construction site trailer is used as an office, it will need heavy duty dead-bolt locks and auxiliary locks, plus metal bars over any windows,to help prevent entry by a thief. The buildings need heavy duty dead-bolt locks on all exterior doors, and security lighting around the building and in the parking lot. An alarm system is also highly recommended. AIRPORT Requires submittal of Notice of Proposed Construction for determination of lighting/marking requirements or determination of hazard or obstacle. Result of FAA review should be reviewed prior to issuance of Building Permit. PLANNING Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. •I City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-034,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 3/20/97 APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen RJECT TITLE: Union Plaza Shopping Center WORK ORDER NO: 78194 LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street • SITE AREA: 254,698 s.f. (5,85 ac) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 80,496 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air _ Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services / Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14.000 Feet . r2 G ,2. /2D 7 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS )pavAf. , . f . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS / �C We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. $/zi/97 Sig ure of Director or Authorized Represen ative Da e DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Transportation Comments Due: 4/3/97 Application No.: LUA 97-034, SA,ECF Date Circulated: 3/20/97 Applicant: Northwest Prompters Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Union Plaza Shopping Center Work Order No: 78194 Location: 3904 NE 4th Street Site Area: 254,698 s.f. (5.85 ac) Building Area(gross): 80,496 s.f. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments li B. Policy-Related Comments C. Code-Related Comments Street improvements (NE 4th Street) has existing curbs, gutters, sidewalk, street paving and street Tights. New access driveways to the site will be required and they must meet current City Codes/Standards. A study will be required to provide trip generation,AM/PM peak traffic volumes and splits to and from the site. A traffic mitigation fee of$75 per daily trip will be required. -�- y7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date gmfldr 2- y3 U��Y O� + ARA 4. 1 1 'f „Air- ,16 . •.y - � T, �w b7yYr .A. & : .a . .» w M 4 ;Y»: fvo t .. w , . .4 r ..vw»::Ra... .r : ...i. —...... w2... ...... Project Name Vhoom Plaz.q Sti0pp, (cH-1fv Project Address 3 ?014 10 E Li-e 11 STve et" . Contact Person Cavl CoIsovl Olrvi pc AssociatrsCo . Address 701 D(x<✓ Aiie A) ) 41 30I Sea-tflt R8 ioq Phone Number 2 8 5 - L. 300 Permit Number L.UA - en - 0 3L} - Project Description Refui 15 holort,y C�v f ev - 4 h/i s. l. 3y6 p/c spaces 22,Zo D iz,erl 25,453 Reba, I - -3- 5.4. O i ce. - 85 s. 1- Re57auvci - uvzot Gvccev - 22, 0 427 5.-P. /4 l _ ) —4-et s.1 . . Land Use Type: Method_of Calculation: • ❑ Residential TE Trip Generation Manual Q-Retail 0 Traffic Study @"Non-retail 0 Other • Calculation: S-ee dttAttled Sitett 41'07 co 1'75 f v'n eD 175 � trip - . $- ly ohs • OD ! ,53, zl2. 25 1 AJRw 4/4/{7 1 Transportation Mitigation Fee: i .�r aD !53i Z17.Z 5 Calculated by: Aid alaZ4 Date: LIA47 1 Account Number: • Date of Payment 1 Transportation Mitigation Fee Calculation Union Plaza Shopping Center Average Daily Net New ITE Code Trips per Primary Trips Sq. Ft. Average Daily 1,000 sq.ft. (%) Proposed Trips Retail 820 75.62 trips 25% 22,200 sq.ft. 419.69 trips Office .710 23.65 trips , 100% 12,916 sq.ft. 305.46 trips Restaurant 831 81.61 trips 29% 25,953 sq.ft. 614.23 trips Grocery 850 125.48 trips 25% 22,427 sq.ft. 703.53 trips TOTAL 2042.91 trips * Retail figures (average daily trip rate) based on Shopping Center, using curve equation from page 1234 based on total size of center(all uses) * Office trip rates from Table 4,page 942.(using extrapolation). * Restaurant trip rates based on assumption as Quality Restaurant (page 1249 -by equation), which is lowest trip generator for restaurant designations. * Grocery trip rates based on estimated value for weekday daily trips, based on ratios established between peak rates and daily rates on weekends. Manual only lists peak hour values for weekdays. Same trip generation values used for Safeway store on NE 4th St. * Assumptions for primary trips for various uses (thereby discounting pass-by and diverted trips), are based on values used for Safeway project, derived from information provided in the ITE Manual. Based on mitigation fee of$75 per net new average daily trip: ($75).X (2042.91 daily trips)= $153,218.25 UNPLZ-2.DOC\ CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: March 21, 1997 TO: Peter Rosen, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal `! SUBJECT: Union Plaza Shopping Center, 3904 NE 4th St. Fire Department Comments: 1.The preliminary fire flows for each building are ; Building A- 4500 GPM, Building B- 5250 GPM, Building C- 3500 GPM, Building D- 3250 GPM. The primary fire hydrant for each building is required to be within 150 feet of the building. Additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of each building at the rate of one hydrant for each 1000:GPM of required fire flow or portion thereof. Example, Building B would require 6 hydrants, one within 150 and 5 additional hydrants within 300 feet. 2. The fire flow for Building B may not be available in the watermains serving this area. If not, the type of construction can be changed to lower the required fire flow. The preliminary fire flows were calculated on type V N construction. 3. Sprinkler systems are required in building A and B. Buildings C and D may be required the be sprinkled if they are serving alcohol and have over 5,000 square feet of undivided floor area. Fire alarm systems will be based on the actual use of the buildings. 4. Separate plans and permits are required by the Fire Department for sprinkler, fire alarm system and hood suppression systems for the restaurants. 5. The required fire mitigation fees based on $.52 a square foot are: Building A- $18,922.22 Building B- $15,854.80 Building C- $3,961.88 Building D- $4,707.56 Please feel free to contact this office if you have any questions City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Plan Review-Water Comments Due: 4/3/97 Application No.: LUA 97-034, SA,ECF Date Circulated: 3/20/97 Applicant: Northwest Prompters Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Union Plaza Shopping Center Work Order No: 78194 Location: 3904 NE 4th Street Site Area: 254,698 s.f. (5.85 ac) Building Area(gross): 80,496 s.f. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments B. Policy-Related Comments • C. Code-Related Comments Water Main extension, fire hydrants and DDCV assembly's (building fire control systems will be required and must meet current fire codes/regulations. Water meters for domestic/irrigation will be required sized to meet UPC requirements. Water system development charges (SDC)fees of$0.113 per square foot of gross site area will be required. • Signature of Director or Au orized Representative Date grnfldr • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW.SHEET Reviewing Department: Surface Waste Water Comments Due: 4/3/97 Application No.: LUA 97-034, SA,ECF Date Circulated: 3/20/97 Applicant: Northwest Prompters Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Union Plaza Shopping Center Work Order No: 78194 ' Location: 3904 NE 4th Street Site Area: 254,698 s.f. (5.85 ac) Building Area(gross): 80,496 s.f. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments B. Policy-Related Comments C. Code-Related Comments The Site will require an extension of the sanitary sewer system to reach the proposed buildings within the site. Side sewer connections will be required and the cost is $80 per connection. Sanitary sewer (SDC) fees will be required at$0.078 per square foot of gross site area. The site will require a storm drainage and temporary erosion control plan with design in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City. Detention/biofiltration will be required via a drainage swale, pond or wet vault. Surface water (SDC) fees will be required at $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface on the site. ` �� q-/ - 9 7 rC utthhorized Representative Date Signature of Directoro u p gmfldr • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DoitCc.„ COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-034,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 3/20/97 APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen • g1 JECT TITLE: Union Plaza Shopping Center WORK ORDER NO: 78194 LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 254,698 s.f. (5,85 ac) l BUILDING AREA(gross): 80,496 s.f. S MMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use • Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 411- (.e) police calls e tLma±2ck ann feed k I cy) I 4UL PWie o 00L- Pudfcciii ahuts_,/ This area of Renton reports a high number of commercial burglary, robberies and thefts from vehicle types of reports. To help prevent these kinds of crimes , the businesses will all need solidicore exterior doors. Back doors will need peeop-holes for employee safety, to aid in the observation of the back alley-ways. Security lighting will need to be in place around the exteriors of all the buildings, esiJecially in the back sides. Access to the hack of the B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS buildings should be limited- preferably with security fencing. After the businesses have closed this area could become dangerous due to the lack of natural surveillance by business merchants. This area of Renton also reports a high n'umber•of drug-related activity incidents , such as drug sales in parking lots. Recommend that the landscaping that covers the exterior property line of the property be thinned out and replaced with chain-link fencing instead or in addition to the landscaping. Because of the lack of visibility around and behind the businesses , criminals could be tempted to congregate in these areas for drug related crimes or to attempt to break into the businsses via the back doors. By eliminated the excess land- C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS scaping and providing chain-li'nk fencing, visibility will be greatly improved - thus allowing other merchants or customers to keep an eye on the property. Each. back door to each business will need auxiliary locking devices in addition to heavy-duty dead-bolt locks (such as a latch guard and pry-resistant cylinder around the lock) . Each business needs a security alarm system. Security lighting will need to be maintained in the parking areas , as well as surrounding each building. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. �y1 /� t - a, - 9 Sigh re of 'rector o Aut prized Representative Date DE‘)IAPP.DOC City os Renton Department of Planning/Building/P14....o Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Aw o T COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-034,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 3/20/97 APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen p1ECT TITLE: Union Plaza Shopping Center WORK ORDER NO: 78194 LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 254,698 s.f. (5,85 ac) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 80,496 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth V Housing V Air' ✓ Aesthetics V Water V Light/Glare ✓ Plants V Recreation V Land/Shoreline Use ✓ Utilities V Animals V Transportation V Environmental Health V. Public Services V Energy/ ✓ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment ✓ I 10,000 Feet / 14,000 Feet ✓ Eef)Ot • LEVEL AT S t T E tZ 40d' ASL ( A$OU€. 5eA i-EVEL), CA-DUMb 4 l<3LAX- 1EKCseD 279` 4SL coca !.AL sOQ . A .L -'JAitDM .50F2. 1u RDtN . AtiRA9c4—. l B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS I. lv =Vet', $LtX . DePMIT V33 3L-t W 1..)5$ 4s,s GOKPATC$L WIN oPf2AcoliN ©p xlczpar MMD 5.5tet.s. tr-e cV.•(tta6 -.tVP.ArT'. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS W-QutQ85 3u8t4LTT4L OF' PiD`+Let 9245Pry D COttS'TQ.ucc tI)14 roe- cf g..-EMeLfII L ) pf: :uct rt t,tf trtaYtNc wb4 t5 op_ DP UC�UJ �Rto� `Z'0 SDuAr1c� M 8 '2t�st9 ao� cA,A 2BU 1 Eu) st&c u LD 3 444. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wheie =..itional informal•is needed to properly assess this proposal. tua dk 4 7- Sig natu ii f Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP Rev.10/93 • 1 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works • ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Cmstyttatov‘ Sebuu ,o COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-034,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 3/20/97 'line OF RENTON 1 APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen I MAR 2 n 1997 qIJECT TITLE: Union Plaza Shopping Center WORK ORDER NO: 78194 LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 254,698 s.f. (5,85 ac) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 80,496 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. 1 A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More I Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessa impacts Impacts Necessary Earth 1 Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare. Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use • Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment ' 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 561t, R P b e_T OU5 lo u r- (b r A !O 1R , A ( 15 PbTakyliftt/ Pak UOPRU1pk) ilsab [� 8� gat B L[ OPJA EbiLO 1 • .i)\e4 l • qq Lt f Tfo1U t ROC,Ik) Oblil[. 15 R1iRD1 • • txxixpwx_xiumaxixpottxam B. Soils report does not contain the analysis for peotential for liquefaction as required by the Uniform Building Code, 1994 Editon, Addendum is required. C. CODEIRELATED COMMENTS: NONE. 1 We have re : e• ,i. applic-t with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where :dditi. i it• '� : o , -:d-d to properly assess this proposal. 1 / f 11. A 2.2142 Signature• Director orAuth• ed Representative Date DEVAPP.D.C Rev.10193 NGIN AENGIEEERINGCIDRE, -91 E y� q PLANNING z Q Q �T��• MMUCENENT A , \ W ^G- I 701 DE%TER AVE.N. \\ - -Q Z NE 61/1 ... W SFATRE.WA.96109 Z (206)285-4300 LIII 1 NE bIth PLACE g Q R-8 OLY MPASSOCIATESC R-8 R- 1 �8 R-10 COMPANY oq III I I NE �bSTREET R-8 UNION PLAZA l -8` R10 R-24 SHOPPING 0 i - CENTER Cb & OFFI( RM-I R-10 NE n►,STREET �� R-10 111 Z � _ RM \\1 RM-C \5ITE \ I _ ` Z CS cs O CS k \ n NE 4th STREET SITE VICINITY CS MAP R-8 - CS - - , / NE 3Pd PLACE r--sue—� CS P-1 R-10 VICINITY MAP FOR UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER - - nnnn416.01 �\ 0100' 400' *�1VlJ/�=,1p 200' 800' ,� • • • KETST EIIETdNMGL tl-LLEsIERN RED CEDAR I iI lt-ERASER PNOTNIA w�L/!�E LIVIL] ]-UEaTEI•N RED LEDAR I „.. o 0 f. LIN! T� oauGLmFIR SPECIFICATIONS i_I_� 554 • I 4711 `F la3-:3'OG IGK • "••aaaa•:8... SRV •••.n,Coa� e 1-Tao E�31sE I •�' .emm+�r" -- n-iNTK FIRE ]s.ERASER PNNorwA �O�f'7 , �,^r r„_~�yrr•_~~ �O- I. RED I'WL , .' • PIERIS �O ....r... e •3O'19 It'', .I� �, !T_MEOTNE ,t•OINGILCOD L. B-DUJdR aKR3'11A f I '�'tl % ' __ _ __. u . IS•NT I ! �.I) I f/ G I n'NT-BERM I RETAIL IdIILDNG� ,•`�- ( . , . ..+rw ..._.._�.... w.......r. II 1,i CER I Iv 5PR -— .►'rR ]5-BROADMOOR , '��—•m _ St-' n-•ANAH KRI6PKE• JUNIPER•6.O. 1 :INK'HEATHER 5D-•SPRIFCNK)OD PRK' RHODODENDRON . iaA ✓/ 1 /t�� ]'h'OL. , HEATHER•]y•AC ' •3 'OL. D. BER1 • r�y /S�4• �- ]3-mTTO II 'h 32-'SPRIGODOD P.C. ,�% r.rwrer�.+.,....r......... c W9 T�K¢H' \ I •:�,/ - •: I NEATNER•}'h'O.C. ' rA..w...-.r_ ..r. Y�' 2 ' % fr 77 - C-=Rt--- - _-- -- L --..1-- -' t= - _ �_ 11414 C KEYSTONE Sry u 1iw,/•Ir• T,g�hh,(•■. �1 _Ili IC r [(��]j �,/� j r- �I' - I]'Ni.BEM" ► v•A I �� I �� I Ira,. D NT� I I I Cd�• V/9.q � � 1 VI II CivIL/NG ►' /' .,r.r.. .•_•.... ®.....-:w„-s.e._....�.._ e c o IUALL(SEE �3a��/;��j e....e..u.. _.....u . Z.�1 W-T:WANZAN, • a l5-'SPRNGIgOD PINK. 1N _ U 16-'ANTN.PNT WATERER! HEATHER•]'h'OL. , = 3-DOUCLAS •� r•+*-gLu+.�+�.Z.ram:. I PIERRT SPIREA••3.AC. ((�TS}Y 7,--]-•ANAN KRUSPKE' FIR • L � ' '•ii� rt' :% I •SNO•0.C.�RCXi or .u.w. �..r. _ �' ,` ®jl.- 3L,'O.L. aa5-•3.A 7,44) ' I 1 ► ::•111_ Il 12 NT BER'15 q' T.BER1 NC IF 3'OL. 1 ..w.rr ,•n-•r.r.. �n:......n. ........�. I I ' ► ilk r'15 ._ r_ .•_r ._ CC Hi' '' �/ W:\NI I '�1/� 1NC `RED CEDAR .1, _.�..._._ •1, )08. ELLERI'NOLLT I]-'CLE.rELANDSELECT' II IBUILDNGWI `A[i -- Z I :1111 FL01tERNG PEAR Ti.'NELLERI'NOLLr _ .. ..._•...ww•ti...e....n,..•... O •J'O.C. •3'OC. ii A I I I�:if/ ��.5 S FPGLAs I . ` ew.._. Z<W � { i i (�Yn b'AP1dH KId15C,KE' R Z 11 I 1 I 1/ :, 1T� n•HT.eER I n•HT..L. Pr - .R,yoOLe,..`= i�i9 ,. 0 N a W'11t. 1 I'`' 3 I e i ' I '! a-LIESTERN / — Q 3 i �� 1 E_": �1F. iYi I RED CEDAR %b"A.: FaF Z ��{■■EEt{\ IrI �'I ITA:ii .LL� I RETAIL I I 0.4.. e Z I -•mod 164{` 5.-'NELLERI'HOLLY 152-•ANTHONY WATERER' 36-12ELLERI•HOLLY '(�j�yi I I . \i �I / •3'OL. SPIREA•3.AC.• •3'O,G + ]]- DORA! L 1 e i M••�.-�=a• a •� IY I • F I I /i .... - DAT U.Ni.BERM I �` I a� y IcoR CA 1 I _ rr BERt]! 1.”` r I - n•MT, I +., y lY" -` .+o r ' `•' £ Q HT ..= Qr `� ' RbK 1F� I �� 0! ► An ' I gi 1 r ', � I]- THE 4P1 C i ca�. I'}'lIf -_ �-d .r., I104 '� I I I I i 6 ,2,'NT a''ROOKERY }TERCE RTTER fj Ta;: _ I11 1 ]]6-•SPRNGJWD PINK• n-'ANAN KR4SCNKE• t-KWANZAN• RESET SEE C LJ 31y'OG Q��T•,)ri� �.�.•.r.. '�'eR Nwww Hun mn.a_. I,.c NECATNER 65-'SPRINGLLOOD PINK' RHODODENDRON CHERRY - Ge•Q \-77 1 I I MSC' I •}S HEATHER•}h'O.C. •3h'OL. I d n. 5.Gam' ' A iev��IMi —j 1 Y LAU1 ,f •11I n . T I I� 1 1 I ctou .i - �R1j 11 0VI' I n� v i �~v .m...... 41 ..T....9 L�Ra`3f =_ M = == I = I =__ dP aF.== Foil, ��li�1r1 I I CEEDAR A`4CA / ']t/ t� ,-- }1-BROADMOOR i` -74 1.34 JTTO- _•• W-'SPRING YJOD PINK' 3-GREEN ,'I 1,,,;.„le" JUNIPER•6'04 I'Ii .yUTKEN 1�'�R•j JS-'SPRMGJIOOD PING• }t-MN FIRE'PIER14�: NEdTHER•]'h'OL '1I/ ' IG t LAN1ffL 'I 3'h'OL I'IAPLE �I•'! {,.OL jE 1 HEATHER•}'h'c.c. /y.�'f 1 • ALAL 1�:.' N-KRNIKNNICK TiEE RAMNB MO BTAKIq PETAL I ��I I IBUILORG 9'I 2/3-DWARF 5KR411A IBUILDwG'Cl' •3'O.C. «•'r •3'CC, 078 n•N.T, , •3'OL. SEED �JL` ]-DOLGLAS FIR i i'uT / 1\ 5 FRASER PNOTNIA W-B�FEdDRG ENGLISH �► . Ii BEAR i -. BER"a ./ s AC. Ew.3'h CC. �.,�ANN .API �!�. • • •a a •a • • a • _3L•�_,._r__ i 6-7 s i -.- ,p `a CEDAR E° W 1. cC .i STERN "' ��.� ./c �'+Lc ..,.,,- ... . w� III Q�'r T'+v ,^ Q R ,f E g.' I I .-- }].'TFNDE LLEBSTER 133-KwVKUa11CK ".wl ,.., LS ■ _ d - 6.1 • L _ ]-ILESTERi RED / RNODODENORON • t li , T6•A3`'OL.I CEDAR \ •3'h'OL. •3'OL. ea.x I wm{ , _1 11• • I.] iJ ROCKERY(SEE CIVIL, 0 PLANT MATERIAL LIST I _ am BOTANICAL NAME I COM'ION NAME I sus,SPACING I _ m .mu u.. W W d n r r,- n�r _ • � ur 9i•r Iw...ova 3 ACER PALMATU'1 GREEN JAPANE O MAPLE ]'CAL,10'NT,BUSE. Z ��'�'•u�"• II ACER RINBRW,�D SUNSET' 'RED SUNSET'RED MAPLE ]•CAL,U'-I.'NT.B•B•3C•AC SHRUB RAMNB OCTAL • - ,i q,w: 6 T dwuacTPARONSOIKA7BOIS PDC.SEEPING ALASKA CEDAR 1•-a'MT,5,5 LAM EDGE DETAL j0,-.••I NTS N ORTH -1 d of nw 1 B a•w•_ pl 21 PRNNS SERRILATA XWANZ4N' K1UAN}AN'FLOWERING CHERRY ]'CAL,10 AT NT.BM,BR•.'h' M8 FWFVV M•a 6 •Ir we• OT it , U PSEUDOTTUGA MENZIESII OCUGLAS FIR 1'-a'Cr.B•B � �' µ•C L ..r. n PTRa C4IERTANA..E•ELAIO SELECT'CLEVELAND SELECT'FLUNG PEAR ]'CAL.b'-U•WT.BM,BR••4Sf ' L I [},.O e ilE •.0 .. 23 TNLA PLICATA aESTERN RED CEDAR ,'-a'NT,FULL,B,B s ® ^•a• 1% 2S0 ARCTOSTAPNTLOS OVA-uR51 KIMIIKIWICC t GAL.CONT.•3.CC, PLANT MATERIAL LIST • VIE,SPACING I J0 SCALE: 1" =6 30' 60 '1- „W'a�9 ea! .e••+•r• m rr 653 ERICA LdREA'SPRRYfiIOOD PINK''SPREASI00D PINK!HEATHER I GAL.Colt.•]VI'Or.. I OTT,I BO7ANIcAL NAPE I CP•UIOc NAME U n•.ur o n..ri n p I)22 GA1LTNERIAL IS ST LN STLLAL I GAL.CONT.•3.OG. Sn 46 ERNS 46 RHODODENDRON I IOSI C. LUMEN''OTTO 6,-.L'LAUREL ]I•-]a•NT,B,B•3A..OC I (IJ Sheet .vn.+.a�..a•.. Vm 213 ILEX CRENATA'NELLER!'CORPELLA 'GELLERI°HOLLYDAYLILr 2 GAL.COST,•3''O.c. 0 334 R,ODGDEIDRP,'TRUDE lIEeSTER"RIDE SEESTER R.ODODENDRO.N ]I•-]a•LW,B,B•J'h•OC R 0 Y a6 .NIPERIS SASFIA'BROADMOOR'BROAD5OOR JUNIPER 5 GAL.CPR.•6'OG 36 SKIMMIA FEEVEbIANA DWARF•JOMTiIA 55GGGAL.CONT.•]'OC rt U•KKT Z L— PNEOO ant RA MA KTA, WA PNOTINIA FRASERI FRASER PHOTNIA 3 GAL.CONT.•S.AC. it 22B SPR2EA XE MILD.'ANMNT SHYERS'ANTNONT WATERER'SPIREA 2 GAL.CONT.•3'OC IuosRc M8 36 SERIF JAPONICA 1.11N.FIRE' 11114.FIRE'PIER'S ]I•.}a'NT,B,B•3'h'OL. 13 TAXUS BACCATA SEPANDENS SPREADING ENGLISN YEW B'-IB•5PR•31)'OC, Je,heya.GmAe. Q �m J • __ --— __ . \v` D ter R` ARCHOECNIHE Y' 7 `N ENGINEERING r 1 ��\ _3 I . PLANNING 4N RAGE WINAGEMENT - EXIATRY.IESE CO ER. 11 III ""i 1 R —^ R-B 701 DEXTER AVE.N. Aka SITE CONTAINS A'.MIXTURE P ALDER IS WOODEDDOU LA R--liii ft•E R-10 I 6EATTl E,WA 98109,�'. o..,.o`- AND ITE(BEFORE A DEVELOPER?)CF WILDER D01r1A5 FIR (206)2&5-4300 AND UNBLOCK DIE TO EXTENSIVE SITEa7RC 4•-0•WIDE• om TIE IEPEWDOSING TREES WILL BE R EMOvED.REFER I I I I ' ' NE•N eT1EET 't�A.■ 0 L Y M P I C LANDSCAPE..PnE '• ' TO L NEW LAN:MAPS*PLAN FOR FFORMATION NRpp]TEE�WCSfR TO OINL DRlJIEG9 -Y v'-P• p,.p AND LOCATION OF NEW TREE AND FLAN, Y R-24 EWCOIfd•IL%g ON E TARW..AND T •pr___ MATERIALS.FEFER TO CIVIL PLAN FOR PEW - 8 R-10MEI ASSOCIATES ena«, vow. • ae°°Fa:AN o c°NraR°F°ra'°T wi —�c COMPANY NEVI cO177GVR5 Alp FE,ANSIG UNLLS � ; • • - OE WAY 20•WIDE DRIVE AISLE I -I I ��" HE SN STREET - rI °: e,f‹.1 At R-10 m —1 MAO y, / EXISTING ONO?MU CONTOURS.UTILITIES \N\111.NMIlv _� _�' '4.":-4,: / / [PREFER TO OVAL DRAWINGS��•% / \jj - FjFqQ FFQUIMICR CR EASING AND R-1-G UNION PLAZA• '�•�� ;, V NSW CONTOURS AND RETANNG WALLSY/j%..�•�j�\\ rTTPICALL IQFER TO[NIL DRNUFGS:,' V'_ /4%'.-.;/1<,.:;\j yEFOR LOUTIOIS OF ALL EMISTING,vD _ RM-G _I SHOPPING �, j $ PEW UTILITIES. - GS LdIpRAPNG '�... . /jI 5•-m•WIDE\ ...,\.\/ 3 v LNDSGMEG mTc1TT �j/ i 3' ,. R R_R__)�I I__R_R_FEfN Him ::- . .':.` :'.....a"`% CS 4 , II. _ • 3904 NE 4th STREET i \ 6I i ; ,' a R-S GS RENTON, WA 5 • '��d3'S7$°P 5a7• -i--` ar SCAW "°" \\.\ f ; r f l a �� Nei __IE . I : ,• V-\w"\ \'\ P-I,� es eANDSGAPNGWI um] ,<\\ �..a, p \ \ „a„ a \ r T\ 2 VICINITY MAP /. 0•LWao' 400' \ \\ — SCALE r=zao-0 1 ' Eu, O \ I - Ott OP RENTON FORM G.AMFI-�,YN C9 \� \ • N TOTAL POII1 FOOTAGE o lIE SUE. riAbSS IF. \ \ 6- r- 60' 6.1w, )3 T' \ v TrnALMINE FOOTAGE OFT1E=ON-A SITE PLAN • I}�IIlDINSSPAA� MR SF. '''''\ . OULLDNi L' S°N SF. \ \ _ ND a \ RETAIL TOTAL )USJ SF. \ \ 4® C ) WIND \ ��\ 4 \ \ MIDI.Y• TAU SF.\ �. RESTAURANT APR, NGD b : \ \ NESTALRANT TOTAL 1 U SF. \ \ b v \ l \. \ \\\ • \ )4 m TA m•-�TF-m^) T m \\ EuuOING IS• npT SF. 1 \ � , m \ T 50A5/eF.\ � \ FIMIEOT OTK BUILDING"A" ! E i1 I I �I I "DO TOOL MIME FOOTAGE of LCQ Fao plb •USSSF. • F'ERCBOAGE CF LOT COVERAGE, N8 2nd FLOOR : ‘ swg, -�..4T I VP \ � _ - '� PAIRAN)ANALrae . m, ..® 5 CARS V y CARS: 4 RILL-ITF SPACES PwvDFD 32e v -- S.• V .X- S CARS•swe. .1.•G, :/, f3•-0•aTa-0.1 I I - fie• 10,0WALES Pa�vDED o L�dl°D•WI9GAPN; , `Tre .-°. ::• HANDICAP AWESOME SPACES 1 %�/ O'ER CAC.NV STAWARDSI ISIFFER , �o /%��%�� % , %%%-.��//I, LIrri/iij i • - PNSCSY.SPACE TOTAL )u -�-�/2� _ MORE FOOTAGE OF NT900R LOT LANESCAPNA TIE SF. ENISITN;E• E)05TNG MNiIOLE / — —-1. —`NEW e•SEVER LEE 1— &MARE FOOTAGE w ALL OTHER WDSCAFW )°.SR SF. SEDER LEE ExUTI1G ETORSE RT5TEI'I N .4TN AVE. ® \ ALLOUTASLE Il14DSO KIWT x•-a . NEW 5•SEVER LSE DUSTING U.WATER LSE PIUIOSED MONS,EVJR le E - NEW S•-0'WIDE 516EIu4K • Mae®381130O0e a•FRONT S.•5DES • NE915'-a PLANTING STRIP I'•__ ,m >u rst 9bt11fi.01 • FIRTIaOSEO SMACKS IF N SIDES-A�0C.ILIII�T 1 SITE PLAN ` "'REAR SCALE 1•=40'-0• \1 3 PROJECT DATA mt. RP fat 3/14/97 0935 In . . a 0 . 0 0 0 0 . �m,e, •f•, •1• 'L •L .L 4, r.•T.bli ARCHITECTURE— -— _ _ r me ad O ad we a•d we wem: and ad ad ad ad we and �7 ENGINEERING / // I / I / \ \ 1 I I \ \ \ \ \\ \ PLANNING '"� ,11111111114 ;i. .� i. . 0 A I Avg. minim ` YMIAGEYENf Cram{p 701 DEXTER AVE.N. "' - AriSEATTIE WA 98109 ' IQ!E - (206)285-4300 OLYMPIC if - „ - Ill V V V V V V ASSOCIATES . COMPANY ---r— . • • . - '— -- -- -- -- — I I I I I I I I I I 1 I UNION PLAZA • © m o o 4i4111 ® ® o b o ® SHOPPING J ...___i CENTER & OFFIrF� 1 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/16" 1 1.-0" 9904 NE 4th STREET RENTON. WA r 00 C T Q a we OO 4 a°d 0 •D U L •L .1., r.•7,�: and ad we }+ re and ll- and and a+ we we we we and Iit I �n '. i , d� , - . . V. �m II ' ,®,�., ,- -- ---- iwIa TZ''T� -El I• 1 t 11 1 IL fi11q, r 1 ISI( - F. ,•Ilii lai..-III"CII ill1P'111I'I"IOAII-l0"IIIL'lII:Nv'ilBIII"100"—Xl Imull:V.'I 111111R:1t'j'a --- 9X1A10111R' iimillII:OI!—"I"IIIl lXlII''II551l1 ISIS-01;;1III Imi11''I1lSl30I9Il1--11111111RIRk—. 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 A 0 0 0 0 1 T• ®® BUILDING PLAN FLOOR PLANS 2 LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLANS SCALE 1/10' = 1.-0" T I I ....,,, ,,,,,..,,...,,„ ti I 1�, --: 1 LT "' L,____T j1 1 1 1�, ; __J--� 1 1 1 1(, �i�" 11 1 L� L it. oam;mum 1 1 1 5 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 'I4 I 1 r _____ _____ _____ •_ _ • 1 r . bi . QQ t . I 0 II To --- ® �® ®.�: nre es 3 ROOF PLAN A- I SCALE 1/10" = 1.-0" v .1. MP We • PLANNING ARCHITECTURE I T LQ ® Q © ENCINEEPoNCm�/ _ I _ _ L J J _ 41 O I 0 MANAGEMENT AI 701 DEXTER AVE.N. SEATIIE)W8-4300 i/11111111i 1 I.' I I I I \\ /' (206)2&5-43110 OLYMPIC a1 _ 1 1 1 ............. y ASSOCIATES 4,0„.l� I I I �\ __4) COMPANY „,, I \II I • II OPEN TO ma s.. UNION PLAZA I 1 raw' r '*Yr = SHOPPING II T. --i CENTER & rs — �`— — — — — �� I-© --- ~'I © OFFICES I I I I I 1 • maguzeguema 1 3904 NE RENTVN, wA II I • VI --y' � _-1---- -� 0. _ I II I 1 I I III I I I I I 11. 11 I 11 IA. I 1 _ I I , 1 _-.V _ : 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I-, I I I 11 1b 11 1 1 ® b 11. m E 1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN — BUILDING "B" 2 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN — BUILDING "B" SCALE 1/18" = 1•-0" SCALE t/18" = 1'-0" _ ._ 0 0 - T .1 ,/- C- 1 t ?< 1 - I row vowersI BUILDING 'B' I ura-erm 1 NI••—� .,....1,.. FLOOR PLANS r( H ROOF PLAN se n I . o I o o 11 ' I I le — j 1 n 8 • tl I nI I n 1 L J n arm 11 I I I I 11 O\<etl\u110M-PU2�U-3 1 u n n n R I n • 1 n U• - 1y ----TT----TT----TT-T~T 7T-TT- -TT -T3T -TT-- -I 4i ® .0 0 P Y R 1 G T• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I II ��. � 134 - V • I 1 I I I, I cici 1 I L4LLL 1 1 • •nam amo q-2 3 ROOF PLAN — BUILDING "B" SCALE 1/16"= 1•-0" • • --_ _ ARCHITECTURE r 1 - ENGIPLANNEERING MANAGEMENT A , 701 DEXTER AVE.N. i I C. ® �e ® co O�O a� O 0 0 asr 0 0 .1 1IL• SEATiLE.WA 98I09 ti (206)285-4300 kill 1 1 IIIIii:1IlII: -- _ `r 'r OFFICES () O OO OO O +O OO 64, Jo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •0. 1J4th STREET L• UILDING "C" BUILpINc "ID" 9004 NE B E TON, WA 1 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/18" = 1'-0" BUILDING 'C' & "D" FLOOR PLANS • •C 0 P Y R I C H T • • • ARCHITECTURE r 7 ENGINEERING • rII( PIN MANAGEMENT • 01 CORER AVE.N. i A 4 iEATTLE WA 98109 .,li FI fIIIIiII III " " lIIII I I • I I I I1�I �1� IIII( • ll� 'llII• •R �IIIII (206)265-4300 Alla0 L Y M P I C ,� Y : ■■■■=■■■■ ■NON-■■■■__■■■■_•U••__•■■ UUI= ■■■ ■■■U_■■■■ ■N-■U■11-_•1111■■=■■■N -. ASSOCIATES P• • .7=f}Kiar'7. .'.F•.unl CaYT 7T--1 _-uC vS'rr;�__ lxxlxllxl- ■rvtGnn-�- _ 1;, J r COMPANY I ? j.1_a.��I''11f r= WAWf Erf7rrso?Ira�!€1•a. a_ -arr__,1rrar:-=r.rinr�ea_.�-- M7 1F= ra`--M.f7Tt"p _:■::I1°-_F11'� _!II•1=.11• -siions11E :!'+II !III•_ IIIIiiiMEMIENIII°__!•'I!_-II1111-__•1I••EINII•iii • • • UNION PLAZA BUILDING "A" FRONT ELEVATION SHOPPING SCALE 1/16".= 1'-0" CENTER & • • . OFFIf'F• ...ennui.... ' ..,. �� 3904 NE 4th 8'_ ___^_ •,...nIIIIIIII',I�.I�III\�IIIIIIIIIlI IIIII1LIII�LIIII1 IIIll all11. =ct= RENTON, WA A - - _ =III= 'z- ICE _ = === __ __ _,.__—_IBA_gi =IBI= _ =I111=. =al a autEcuaacxEan HrWLL _-_-=' I_-_-� - - - _-l_ -� BE MEMO N ROOFTOP RECESSED • }a- __.._ __-- _ _-- _. AST ALL dI1LD1YA� ,,,, ► 2 BUILDING "B" FRONT ELEVATION • —•ll,, '' ,,— SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0" III1111i,, I OFFICE LEASE SPACE - nlllllllllllllllllllllll�llllht\a11rII1FIaIhIIIIIIIlU141111IIIY�4111111111Wr ` I IIIIIIII\-11III-glaI1IIIIIIIIIIIIhIII_IIII_IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIhI,... - j _ 01.1 ._■ ■_-:_■ ■=-11 !' Ill! 7 ■pdIII ■'--c' 1 RN `• =•1•_-:=11'JI _,.] • _II 51= _a •_. _U U— - BUILDING BUILDING "C" BUILDING "D" • ELEVATIONS SCHEMATIC BUILDING SECTION 3 BUILDING "C" & "D" FRONT ELEVATION 4 SHOWING HVAC EQUIP. LOCATION SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0" SCALE 1/6" = 1'-0" FNI0IEP PETAL ROCFFG a.I� am.,".,..•a4. • COLOR TO BE GREEN OR \ ERNE FETAL GRAY \ 1 WAc P ERNE ED FETAL R OFSG CLEARD UFA Sal E6ILATED BAND T MEN CaOR TO BE GREEN DR FREENISIED FETAL ROCFRG GLAI G SYSTEM ....nl/o'1.._. ERNE FETAL GUT . =OR TO OE GREEN OR PANTED EMS.ARC" a ea .® TEPEE FETAL GRAY \ all .. FOOD ATENi'EIl 1 SPLIT FACE Q 0]I12/9) wa..�bl pn FREFINE ED FETAL FASCIA. ^ ( —UNION MATA� Ida- Mea\UGGx_PLAZII�A]-I CARTERS QC SCENT �I W6NISIED PETAL FASGA 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 PANTED WOOD FRIEZE OOAI® dt.. GUTTERS AND SCENT , xx xx xx ._. ...-, \ -_ • PANTED WOOD FPEEiE BOARD = ( -....:,...N. 9 QER NSIATED GL4IG STSTEH—ems =_ c0 il PANED EMS..SIGN ONO - I—, PAWED EIFD SIGN SAW �sPLVFACEav =`�YAfURECRAFf =1 JO'S CARDS =-1 C. SPLIT FACE au � PINDTALN ..— II�f- I L=JII1IIIIIIIIIIIIL- I1 RECESSED FETAL Dau POIT a DELI _\_— SPLR FACE CI'L -- --_ ' l __ RECESSED FETAL DWNSFTNf��— - —�- CLEW NSLLATED GL4ZNG STSIEH e -a.ns.a SPLIT FACE CPU OETOND CLEAR NSILATED GLATNG SYSTEM I — �_ .S�j . �a cu.nr SPLIT FACE CPU P-'•—•I, —- ]SIL, NIX FACE CIL I4�-�I —T• IwF "Y{{FFF 1. ® . //Q�\ 5 TYPICAL BUILDING MATERIALS MATERIAL DESIGNATIONS ARE SHOWN ON PORTIONS OF BUILDING "A"AND "B". - * u-u i BUILDING "C" & "D" USE THE SAME METAL ROOFING SYSTEM. SPLIT FACE CMU, AND SCALE 1/8" = I'-0" CLEAR WINDOW GLAZING SYSTEM AS SHOWN IN BUILDING "A" AND "B". n.. nam "e.v PRELIMINARY WATER PLAN ' �a m..�,,.'e.t'r �...,.,,.,,... WATER DATA, d n':nnm"" �' -r yr + 4%%/%./�//J/-,,7_ /ii,H�//ti.4f.. //��.. .,'. .ee.aaun 0,-r1Qto) .0.51'.,a..,o mF I .. r 66 ;a I • mvrva .^v► • ~!" — -I .• -smmnrF 'dew .�, 0,_rMSS ,erura..ro.�, :. T e1 i® �= � �:Rt:^°j •``'.._....,� ©,_rm�� }z • .... ' / TO ' : ,m,ra n,- •, ,s.uruw6uwv ;F. ,,., • �' Wear 1 MD Wory MGT. v TO p0 -I. i rm ,an,w.a., TO aNST.ucro. : I ■ - e BIG!A' ---- ..,..a - .IP�_f - illi ga 3 1141 ^.�..' i Y SSI vIv ! $ ®1-Fc,�+ssmrQQ .9111 • ' i„ _ d• yy III. _ T. •`,Fl ' Q i- a�inm ua.nr ,J N I ` ,1_ v • ®,-rams )C :' I ■ tG •• 1� 1 o ® _f4,1, t I4 Is - =Ill= • • ..,a. .+!_ : —.,, ,I _.. `- .A-- :— m. ' � ®ii v r of vrt.ssoa' 5 S - V. ,..f. _-I awe ;• I ®,-rR iiimi irmulk, ..,.....: .. ........... v........._ Y yuro, ...... • iImi`'.: -_.4. i s 1 •' •••j,„,_____,,,,____ -- - - -_ 7�. A7R,,. __•- -.. ....... nil ` ,6 . 1 X. _ A .. 4,at. � ,[us vn/ve f a.4 ea}a.t WT..,23/UI/mo, 6363 Srs 1-.0........area.teal-5,le042.0,. • • • PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER PLAN • �7= �� • ss / �• SEWERDATA: ......-- ,,.. •. - /6:- -2--.4 72-.1e....--i•-•: ,..-,-1 1 / f ' COO W. Dork MOW • mCttI £ vA - 1 J senoevsc ,doar .� I i ''i• .Nmtdldl a I .R. -� mS,0 8 • • g",BCDCi'A'' _••I• �.` (� •h- rla--.' BLDG'C' a i FF•39a00 • L v1v-' a y�C ':. • ,tr .CV f .� '. v.v—. FF-404.OD. �n . . s 1 ��t _r;� ! �„ , --a %,41----.- •--1- -- BLDG'D' 1 :e V - _a!s' � 1 ON T. --. FF-404.00 lam;\,14, 'I 1,\-..; __ imin ,316-1 '-c pi _111111L • ....... 15 r f ii -- r41 $ .- - - - -1 .seas — _I- -- ..,. -. ,. _•� ... - a`."-.;r M� ,, F $^' a --— -- -ice- -- sjL_IE 4v�3fPEEi_ -� _ .. t'N'''' I£macs vs/es i 1 N, U, rr a.u.' mom.03/1IPn7 O.'0 Sc.,-•0 0r gavot.u.. 1e0.2-s,S£59-B,. • • UNION PLAZA • ► K KIx . • • T-40' w. � • -'uu'•iI ,....v0 l /j/.// .\ Y!M n S R �s �� SI.0.'0f[ SA00• ♦•• O � ''_'_�j ow...• n ///))) vo�aE r r..3 r Iro r omum e.e LwFl .[.Mi r il '1 1N-,. 4 Rl'ENTON :.,,A, i-., ‘./7z5' x."./ -.%%7 4,...„: r i y n..;. • 0 .:. J :.. w ' 9 I' ,r' - 0 O! ,Esa ...BLDO'B' -.. . ..:• s•' VICNTY MAP CB DATA a o IY..aIa0 • FE-399.000+ ®-'' $', I Lrtzt , om°b`x:.rcac 9 �.s. Y1'1, I c �. R l031 1 nw� .w • wr ,....r.. 9n. sevro . .roar �. DATA ........ _ • CONSTRUCTION c]ise e.-]ma / �,j �:.��e� . �1 •:., ....®.,,�,. '� _ O mo v�v c,�mxxru.�PPE new'CONTROL w i_ I I ! I1. , _ o...a.2OS NM ra RCax.)0 laa..5 MP�..a�s w.21 x /�, - :r �'.t .._... .... .. - .. .. -_. art ...>�.,'.,_ I 0 Ims10..xTw.c.. RR no.. ccswe.m.ws ::gir,an >Z . _ - w] .0.aamroaan smog*CO. colt axm' a. Y y .,•�� r, i '' a.]0 I03'a la cm,ann.aw.I.x .-]07 i9 or., ,.+ w _ . fix $ ©Trex].onmua coxrmrz aim rt.wr sao.m OEM 3 1! • I 3 I--..- --{��•I /-j;"'•, I'-- e 0i am..n OM an PM an m.num DM .T m I.-u U o ^� .` J I• _.. I ;. 0 .DI w.NC0000 m°00OPERTY TO OE�aaTm/.000SSM I+ c.,9x%rxxr CO g e :• ... ._ — .__ t_••. 0 a POW,us.•a POLES 10 a r.w.sa �x i S1. Q 45 :�'a '` ' CIF -'i mnwcr6x'ro'°"anmirz.m.7u]0an.c.w row cwvuas SO . „ :y -u .._•-. ` -- • -.} • ��/ NIA 0 b s.aM mai.a:To a...m.a x.w[ =7.rig apNp 5_ —:Ifr . ...,- '--_.. _- 7--. - BLDG'C'. _ '�° u=i ©a IOU CO CO Imuw .•m7s -- 9 $'r I% ` fP`404.00 1 u < ®El.[w[s o SURRESVEYORS w[ WE ma.sexes TOR �i7m[x-.0 a 4 v RE — avl it--- _,1- I-'-i s ^ Z C00isrwaILIE a roan sc n i .]i%22 % 5 Y]1 ALM. PF�198.00 r.I. • i O. / i -" f Z 0 280 V 0'a9s COMM MS T Oa �,q fi3-Se 1� `' I I :..: ; o fT° • PK.OK It • • �(e JII1 • Fraxe 10�..i' l:. , .3 IT PVC.arc ` 3' -u�. :cc: - { 3 . 0012 I •0M eo If o0n NO CK l LO Rx.f 'I �i mq '�1 I* [1 ��, B1•. ® rr ..c.c.c i d M, A j% 1_;o'F:;=.: • ._' _^!, _ i-_n'I 1` {§IN5 ,I ® 7i ,r o9i C Lac 2 �r y55 j=Y�W .- •I , . i!-1.. 16 . ' I ' ® i .f .b O.t.CK .-]Ox7. 3 8 6 I 8 w ,I` s �`. `'_..-6i i 7 �IY = .;• ® xoo .f al. ..C.6CMai2;v7 o�i ' — 1 Fam _ 77 -II -- -f--- _. . ' 1 'A rf r.]i .K.0R Y.57nI 0' Its -a.. -- +- :l' :' - - -- , .. Y- I ] t ] ..c a2 C 0 • ail /I � � -1 /.gaillelH' : . Wr 1 ® .. .z b9t ..c CPS :.n.c x-u W \'�I __C6/Q T •D n ® in rF.cr. E-300 ra(x 1) '� • e� �� I ® .70 .r 0]i M.CPS m�i1.l%M' '^ w ' I srFi� ,.a 15 k� A n1 Ir 9si ..a.C.x . .-]9.m - MIL .may-..... vT......_.�. ....._.... ..... .�:� ,. --- •_� - - - A -• •-- -t. .' % .Y 05i ..a.CK [•b060ii f K , _ _ -.. i ® A ry s v, PC.CPC _Mee cc . ' J_* f,. �-' - zr, t ..1."� .n o„, - - -. ® % .t xai ..c.CPS o�i1'in7'"tw . ,Q-1R'4' 2 x�� of a ....).___,\______ ---- —_- t -�'-vw _. Dom -.. - 1"e -/, ,v,��ne��1 4b49x g:. 7._J -_ ,�▪ i __iSTIM1w., E 4M-STREET_ l� wl7a..vli x-.S Y, g�N'��. T. ® /7 ... f sail▪=:is7 vi]-' Q I '`n .' EsEl3 OW.. .• 10 ; CI /x..Mt, llkl.l Ili ` `g 1' r []9 b L.. $ .r opippv aw./T.0-1/I2/1091 0032 Sr.1_10 Ai,.m0m Kw. x0017-SI1m12-0,. r- y 10417:ir 13, APR 3 01997 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CITY OF .- • Natural Resources PUBLIC W ;�'�:i' i�;.� •LHER Lands KALEEN COTTINGHAM Supervisor DATE: April 28, 1997 TO: Greg Zimmerman, PE Admin. Public Works Dept . 200 Mill Ave So. Renton, WA 98055 FROM: David John Weiss Resource Protection Specialist South Puget Sound Region SUBJECT REVIEW OF: Union Plaza Shopping Center ACTION SPONSOR: Northwest Prompters PROJECT: Timber Harvest / Land Conversion [] We do not have an interest in the above project and have no comments on the proposal. [X] We do have an interest in the above project and wish to make the following comments: A *forest practices permit will be required for the harvest of timber associated with this project. cc: Dave Dietzman - SEPA_Center - DNR SEPA#: 011752 SOUTH PUGET SOUND REGION 28329 SE 448TH ST I PO BOX 68 I ENUMCLAW,WA 98022-0068 I FAX:(360)825-1672 I TTY.•(360)825-6381 I TEL:(360)825-1631 ®43>18 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer RECYCLED PAPERS LIU.:&' ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Engineering Geology Earth Science Apnl 23;.1997 ,; Mt.Peter Rosen ,, Project:Manager' Planning/Buildirig/Public'Works Department : • Ceit • - 20.0 Mill'Avenue South Renton,WA --98055 APR.2 Dear Mr. Rosen: Q°' T LA Ntv • . , ciryOP pwN Subject: Liquefaction Potential Analysis. , •, Union Plaza Shopping Mall. _'<. NE 4th Street and'Union A_venue'NE Renton,Washington ; City of Renton Application No. LUA-97=034,SA,EFC L&A Job No..7022, Regarding to the Advisory Notes by the-Environmental Review Committee on:the;potential,of liquefaction, at the,site of the:subject project;we provide our response as followss'' . ' The Puget Sound region is.classified as.Seismic Zone:3'by-the Uniform-Building.Code (UBC):,'Thetype Of- soil.most,susceptible,to liquefaction during an earthquake is a saturated,„loose,:fine to medium-grained: . sand deposit: A loose saturated sand"deposit,:when subjected to vibration, 'tends',to compact,and decrease in volume.' If the sand deposit'is unable to drain; pore water pressure will increaser If the.pore:water:. pressure is 1 allowed to build up by continuous shaking;•a "quick" condition will be reached:when the pore .,• pressure 'equals the soil effective;overburden pressure:at some depths.,: Under'this"condition,:the sand deposit becomes.liquefied and,loses'its load bearing capacity: The'subsurface-conditions of the site..--were explored with 17 backhoe test pits,,with the test pit logs .. presented in our:report entitled"Geotechnical:Engineering.Study,'.Proposed Shopping Mall; NE 4th-Street ' . `and:Union NE, Renton, Washington,"'dated March 18, 1997. The site were found to be•underlain by unweathered Vashon Till deposits:of very-dense silty sand with'gravel at:depths from 2 to:4'feet.below existing grade;: Overlying the unweathered till are thin layers of medium dense Ablation Till and'medium- dense to dense, weathered Vashon,Till. `•The'unweathered Vashon Till'has 'a.very:'high shear strength.. • Groundwater at:the site is limited to isolated pockets of perched water iof small quantities; ,Consequently, it punlikely qoccur at the subject is our opinion that is for r,li uefaction;to oc'c site If you have any.questions regarding this letter,please feel free to;call us: ' 19213•Kenlake`Place NE, '• Seattle 'WA;:98155-3242'; I , Phone(206)483-9134 Fax(206)486-2746 ' Apri123; 1997 . . Mr.Peter Rosen L&A Job No:7022 Page 2` Yours very truly,:' .• : • . LIU&ASSOOCIATES, INC• , 1 yel' A" fe I 4'e . 'J: S. (Julian)Liu, Ph.D., P.R.,, . Consult ing Geotechnical Engineer Copy;to: `Carl ColsonIOlympic Associates Company _ , Ricky Chang . ' , , , ,. . , .. ' Lill&ASSOCIATES,''-INC.: • ' ' lOn the ISM' day of iph Q1 , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States,.a sealed 'envelope containing -r e de-eAeW►1vto.. CNN e►vri G41eckit�� documents. This information was sent to: • • Name Representing Department of Ecology • Dick Anderson Department of Transportation • 1KC Water Pollution Control Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher Department of Fisheries • David Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Sue Rumery City of Seattle Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom, Fisheries Muckleshoot Indian Tribe • Rita Perstac Puget Power (Signature of Sender) Savvitett._ k. C...,.�..� STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) n I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that / i1I 5/PA signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. h� .„.A,VAl Dated: qhf/9 L7/ c�� Gt�/ _ � • �'.�'�� • Notary P is in and r the State of WsiitlatQtl'14 r Notary(Print) MA ' My appointment expires: = � '••..,^ Project Name: un‘• p`aZA, •5\nc,rpb Ceh-'t�er' Project Number: 9�-03 4 , sA E. NOTARY.DOC • CITY OF RENTON ..u. 1 \ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse'Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 15, 1997 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on April 15, 1997: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. Location: 3904 NE 4th Avenue. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on May 06, 1997. Written comments and requests for reconsideration shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington, on Mav 13, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval (SA). The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing.If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. If you have questions, please call me at(206)235-2719. For the Environmental Review Committee, Planner Project Manager cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Sue Rumery, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Rita Perstac, Puget Power AGNCYLTR.DOC\ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 cz. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. Location: 3904 NE 4th Ave. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on May 06, 1997. Written comments and requests for reconsideration shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington, on May 13, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Site Approval. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Publication Date: APRIL 21, 1997 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot ��i ". +t - ,1 �� - TY:�=OF:ARE T-C•I. N O N . - ;fit=- - - • �Pl�ri' i li�z a niri Bu ldin�•Pub c Works De s - artment - - �l. l g g P , -, erm n' E- - . •-Aiimini stray- or. •Jes a an a •• •�s T n r Ma Ioi•` • - Gregggg A ril 16".199 T 7- P - J'. -Carl J..Colson Olympic Associates Company 701 Dexter Ave N#301 • attl A 1 SUBJECT• ' '::Union Plaza Shoe in 'Center PP 9 - ';:-',Project No. LUA-97-034 SA ECF.'.` •`; , -Co so,:,...,....,;:i: Dear'- ' I n: This letter:is written.on behalf of the Environmental .Review Committee (ERC) and is to .inform3you that they ,have • :•'completed their review of the environmental impacts.of'.the:above-referencedproject. ' The.Committee, April :15, 1997, `•='.issued a'threshold Determination of Non-Significance_Mitigated with.the following conditions: =.:;':. -. ;.- :2 1 ee e c osed Mitig ation Measures-do ument._S n I g - y lco a`: a`d'Nape.' • - al` eriod -or't•Is ro'ec wil run concurrentl a '-';�:;-The 15 'day min nt n .p f h p; J ,t, _ I• . y. Th commentiaPpeal�periods.for this ;project will end at 5:00 PM-on May;06,1997.:',-Written comments'and.requests•.for-reconsideration shall.be forwarded.to the,.Development;Services:Division Land Use;.R •eview'Supervisor. ':.Information on the project;file and, the;:mitigation measures imposed,by.the:'City of Renton's Environmental.,Review.Committee are available'at the Development'Services Division, Third :Floor,'.;Municipal Building, Renton, Washington:, 98055p`; Phone:' 235-2550.' :::Appeal procedures are available in the City.Clerks office, First�Floor', Municipal Buildin•g 'J' hti, {,_ _ WAC 197-11-660states,.that the:responsibility for:mit gation measures''may_be:._imposed upon a•n:applicant:only to: •the • extent attributable to the;identified:adverse impacts of the imposed;.action. Since.an environmental-impact statement has.not:been 'prepared;for;this project,:an•y.mitigation.measure established by the :ERC riot•.directly attributable• to:an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarilyyaccepted by the applican•t : es' o o co tact'the:various'Cit re`rese tatives •as'a 1'ro riate ''e -'Public.:, <; taff urg y u t - n y. p .,n , , _; , th-,_ ._ Works:Division .as soon as PP p- (. 9 ) . possible,':to obtain`more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended:for•.this project,:if,you have specific questions:,:This information will.assist you in,•planning for implementation of.your project and will `enable You to exercise your:appeal rights more fully,.if you choose to do so. , _r:i::' ;:':''r:.` A.Public`Hearing will beheld by'the Renton'Hearing Examiner at.his regular meeting in'the'Council•.Chambers on the second floor of City Hall,:Renton;: :. Washington,':on May 13, 1997;'at 9:0• 0 AM.to consider the Site Approval ;=;.(SA).,',The_applicant orrepresenta•tive(s) of.the applicant• is.required to be present at the public hearing.°A'copy :. - '7 ' -of the `staff report will, be'mailed to you`•one week before the hearing;:If the,Environmental Deter nination is a Baled the a eal will be heard as part of this Public hearing. 's' uestiio s ordesire'clarification of the`above lease:'call me'.at •206) 5- If you have led,'t o.py.q n , p ( ) 23 ,2719. -: I,, • . . •For the Environmental Review Committee _ - - ® 'r', ' L.'�:�. _ ,5.,.�: .�ll: fir.•-,:'.=:��. ��t Ferri- • ��]', i:.F `Jr r. ...-.::::::,.,...:.::',:::::,T/ _ y'r;y.'� _ _ '/'�' •try 't� .i ‘,-,::!:::...:..,-,,. ...,r..,ii:.,,:,:.;-:...„.,:. - 1 efer. oser P R n' ., a''er. ro'ect•M n -�r� 1 - - i4 5.' - '+tin ri'" - .0' e• wesf�Rr m"t rs` cc� �cc�°ry North - w P - art-' . aP ecor �y xj:: 'DNSM TR.D "" " 2�� 11 1Aveu`iVI n on`;Washiri tori"98055 g : , f r 7, 5• - F. RENTON CITY'.O :._: - : DETERMINATION.OF NON=SIGNIFICANCE _ :•.':: , MITIGATION MEASURES • , APPLICATION NO(S):-.•, �LUA-97-034,SA,ECF- :`'. ; •: est Prom pters APPLICANT: • Northw p :....,. : . ' ._,,',,'- ,. . . .:.:=PROJECT„NAME: - • :.Un'ion Plaza Shopping Center , DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:.: :..: ; Proposal ;fora retail shopping •center and "offices consisting of 4 buildings fora total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces.::Access would be :: `:via two drivewa `entries off NE 4th Street.„,. Y _ C ION'OF PROPOSAL:"••.--•- : ;.3904 NE 4th Avenue`: . .... .. . LO AT • a r: - ".,: :MITIGATION MEASURES ',' •-:-: : ':$ {< f; .` a�k :.,::. '�1r :J _r $t - 0'52 e ee it :a rate'of• r •1. The:a �licant•shall a`� ':the ,a� ro riate'�fire:�Miti ation':F $ .p _ •a ed at" 4 1 8• 57.92.'•�':..The:.Fire . . . ...... ... :. ware;foof'of new' construction: =This :fee 5,7,v estim t $4 , - 'Miti ation�Fee is�payable pnor�to�fhe issuance:of Building Permits:• • . e a e dail - s�al,: e��re~ uiredto��a �a�TrafficMiti �aton'�Fee of 75 for each av r - 2.`�''t_'Tne`applicant h I b 4 P. Y. 9 h•.- '.�$- - _ 9 Y -, - : ,` triip`'•associated with the'•project.'=.The,•traffic=\mitigation 'fee 'is;yestimated ;at $142,068.00 -• • '•.. - ._._..; . ;�� (1,894:24;trips 'x"$75.- $142,068:00): �'1'Fiis�fee'is payabie�"prior to issuahce of..Building . . • •ts. Y:` •Perms ', '3. :" ;The,Construction Mitigation Plan.shall,be revised.to restrict•haul hours to between 8:30 a.m` ' 'to 3:30.p:m._unless::approved:;in:; lance.Y.. - Fe',Deyel/-.'. oServices Division.' :The. : ` ^revised,Construction:.,Mitigation:Plan shall,be 9submitted;for:approval'prior..to issua'nce``of • ::- '•' °Construction Permits " �-` �,. s., : c. • • r _ if'' -▪..f:�: .�S: '.}ice _ - f. ' - - - __ is _ - - r •C' „fir i ^Tt)1 i h` . iw v�b _j. _ .%ice tf 1'�3i r' y , i.l' .;.r 'Ji • - - _ its... - ::p .:f�. - - - .)"r i,\'_r' �tip••.:'" - ▪ :f: L. I'- _ ..., -.,---: -.....?:.-:-.. .;:,:'...i':.::::''.: ;j...:,::'''ffrP:"'"::;;:::.::-:::.:::::.::;-1-1:.::.. ';',;.k.. ,,..• •ft_'. i" _ _ :=CITY. O•F:RENTON = - .DETERMINATION OF NON=SIGNIFICANCE :>::. .' -, (MITIGATED) ADVISORY N0 TES• .A S - : 'APPLICATION NO(S): `',L -97-034,SA,ECF• p� ........ ...... : PPLICANT.� - - _ :'Northwest Prompters - PROJECT.NAME: :Union Plaza Shopping Center. , . DESCRIPTION OF.PROPOSAL: .'` osal for •.`a..;retail shopping• center: and„offices, .-.• • 'consisting of:4 buildings fora total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. ',Access would be;: ::•via two drivewa entries off'NE 4th Street: '': - LOCATION OF,PROPOSAL: !', •'� .. :3904 NE 4th Avenue' , otestoA -�licant:Adviso N PP ry h tt , - a=< he following:notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction wifh the ' _ �`;w' �'';.environmental determination. Because-these'notes�are^ rovided as information onl the `;are not subject to the.appeal,process for9environmental',determinations: a • r ��B t' , ,..;•-.Soils report does 401, ntainthe anal sis for: otential.for liquefaction as required by•'the ,:•;:, Uniform Buildin `Code, 4 Edition::;Addendum•is'required .' .FIRE:-� _ _ iJ : . rfi„ 1.The relimina fire flows for each buildin• are: Buildiin A-4,500 GPM, Buildin- B-5,250 =-;.GPM, Building G 3,500`GPM,}"Building D 3,250.GPM. The:primary fire hydrant for each'.` ' : • "`' :: :'{ '- '.r building is required to be within 150 feet of the building`,:Additional hydrantsrare;required vithm ;, 300 feet_of each bui_e-ka. at the rate of,one;hydrantfor'each`rt1,000:GPM of required fire flow or_ - - 'oftion thereof.-;,For exam le'Buildin B Would re uire'6 hn"drants;''one within 150'feet and 5 :P P - R; q Y 'o �I drants i h n �. =,'��'additi na h w r 's: r;::".':2.'The'fire flow for Building B may not be available in the watermains serving this•area. =If hot, : : `:: .•the type of construction can be`changed.to:lower the required fire flow. The pr•-.ded ary`fire flows• were:calculated on type V.N co nstruction.'. •. • :3. Sprinkler systems are required in Buildings`A and B., Building+C.and D may be required.to be `. ;: :sprinklered if they are serving alcohol,and have over 5,000 square feet of undivided floor area. Fire alarm systems will be based on the actual'use ofthe.•building: ,;:; :' '':. , -_-:, - - r e` rtmen for$ ,'iinkler`: ire alarm : =< - . 4.•Se arate�plan � • • . ... . .. .. . , :, s;•and.peT.rmits are�reguired:by'the�Fire\D pa t . -: p, ,f •. - system and hood suppression'systems.for'restaurants a. , t� -Y-,.' '�`, - _.,y.• `',jam.'') !'�' elf ',4-r r i' , ig: i�% 'z' i, - �t , is}.f`•� zl . `r"e rY�- i.. f•_ - • - l: •Y tt-:r_ - .r. " Union Plaza Sho ]in` Center LUA-97-034,SA,ECF_N , • • • Adviso • otes Continued Page=2•: • ; • VEW PLAN RE I • Watermain extension,fire hydrants and DDCV assembly's(building,firor da. of systems will be required and must meet current-fire`codes/regulations. Water meters for domesticlirrigation will be required sized to meet UPC requirements Water system development charges (SDC) fees _ ;:.; :' _..of$0.113 per square foot of gross site area will be required. ::..:.' :Trans ortation • .' ,Street imp!ovements ,,NE 4th Street has existin curbs, gutters,sidewalks,street avin 9 . • p . 9.. • street li hts New access dnvewa s to the.site will• ,be re uired and the .must meet current City .: • 9 . .•�. . .. - Y q Y Y • Codes/Standards. - Sewer .. ;Sanita• rY _. ...The•Site will [equire�an_extension;of the sanitary sewer_system to`reach the•.proposed buildings::,',. _:•., ,:;-�: ;• within`the site: Side:sewer�co"nnections,will be required.and the cost is$80 perconnection.': anitarysewerSDC)fees will be required at$0.078 per square foot• of gross site area, ;; =.,;-:;; Storm'Draina •e` - r: co '• a. `t desi n • �'�:��Thesite will�re uire'a�storrii-draina�,e and fem-'ora"''-erosion ntrol I n wi h m .`.:��:�'-` �:.. • accordance'with the1990,KCSWDM as adopted by;the`City._,Detention/biofiltration will be :: equired via a drainage swale,°pond°or wet;vault a.Surface water�(SDG)fees will be required at • ;$0.129 per.squar'e foot of new impervious surface on the site • V`a OLICE .: c" ^t] .`The'hi. hest number`of commercial:bur laries'and-thefts.are from construction sites._ Police ..recommend that the applicant fence;in fhe lot withaecurity'fencing while,the •site is under . construction,'and use security lighting asp well.=:Tools.will need to have:the model and serial. numbers recorded,'to •d in recovery if they are stolen:--;If:a construction site trailer is`used as an : :,:,..;,�Y.;. Y . ry Y . • ' office, it will need hea dut dead-bolt.locks:and:auzilia -_locks,•plus metal bars over an windows,to hel revent.ent b ra thief. ;:The buildings.need heavy duty-dead-bolt locks on all . ••;' extenordoors, and securit li hung`around the building and in the arkin lot. :An alarm s stem Y: 9 . P 9 Y is also hig•hly recommended: AIRPORT Re.,uires submittal of Notice:of Proposed.Construction,for;determination of lighting/marking .`r:;.'::- requirements or determination of hazard or:obstacle: Result ofFAA'review should be reviewed riot to issuance'of Building Permit. 'F' ` _ • • �,...,.•::. - ... �- .r. r.- 4r11.i'. :��n _ fit:/:..�' A'`' • • • •II•, 'o- - o' is shall b easif •and•safel,•-accessible�_- _ _Garba'�`e and sec•clable'de"osit�ai'eas'and co ecti n" in y-. y. 4r`ucks '� - �ao�:haiilin `t •: ^r. ._,_;-:___.__ .�._..,,_ _,�__r—;,.___,,._�,_,.,,:.' "Y' ~yf__•_ _ „,.y.__ __ _ — _ _ _ _ -a.__,_.;,..emu.,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ •.fit _ _ :�._ +_Y' 2 __ _ 71}'_ hi a ttiir,_. -dam __ —_ _ rift..�.• _ _ �i�i t "ire - - _..Y'+`• CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-034,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT NAME: Union Plaza Shopping Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3904 NE 4th Avenue Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the 'environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING 1. Soils report does not contain the analysis for potential for liquefaction as required by the Uniform Building Code, 1994 Edition. Addendum is required. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flows for each building are: Building A-4,500 GPM, Building B-5,250 GPM, Building C-3,500 GPM, Building D- 3,250 GPM. The primary fire hydrant for each building is required to be within 150 feet of the building. Additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of each building at the rate of one hydrant for each 1,000 GPM of required fire flow or portion thereof. For example, Building B would require 6 hydrants; one within 150 feet and 5 additional hydrants within 300 feet. 2. The fire flow for Building B may not be available in the watermains serving this area. If not, the type of construction can be changed to lower the required fire flow. The preliminary fire flows were calculated on type V N construction. 3. Sprinkler systems are required in Buildings A and B. Building C and D may be required to be sprinklered if they are serving alcohol and have over 5,000 square feet of undivided floor area. Fire alarm systems will be based on the actual use of the building. 4. Separate plans and permits are required by the Fire Department for sprinkler, fire alarm system and hood suppression systems for restaurants. PLAN REVIEW Water Watermain extension, fire hydrants and DDCV assembly's(building, fire control systems will be required and must meet current fire codes/regulations. Water meters for domestic/irrigation will be required sized to meet UPC requirements. Water system development charges (SDC) fees of$0.113 per square foot of gross site area will be required. Transportation Street improvements- NE 4th Street has existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and street lights. New access driveways to the site will be required and they must meet current City Codes/Standards. Sanitary Sewer The Site will require an extension of the sanitary sewer system to reach the proposed buildings within the site. Side sewer connections will be required and the cost is$80 per connection. Sanitary sewer(SDC) fees will be required at$0.078 per square foot of gross site area. Storm Drainage The site will require a storm drainage and temporary erosion control plan with design in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City. Detention/biofiltration will be required via a drainage swale, pond or wet vault. Surface water(SDC) fees will be required at $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface on the site. POLICE The highest number of commercial burglaries and thefts are from construction sites. Police recommend that the applicant fence in the lot with security fencing while the site is under construction, and use security lighting as well. Tools will need to have the model and serial numbers recorded, to aid in recovery if they are stolen. If a construction site trailer is used as an office, it will need heavy duty dead-bolt locks and auxiliary locks, plus.metal bars over any windows,to help prevent entry by a thief. The buildings need heavy duty dead-bolt locks on all exterior doors, and security lighting around the building and in the parking lot. An alarm system is also highly recommended. AIRPORT Requires submittal of Notice of Proposed Construction for determination of lighting/marking requirements or determination of hazard or obstacle. Result of FAA review should be reviewed prior to issuance of Building Permit. PLANNING Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-034,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT NAME: Union Plaza Shopping Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3904 NE 4th Avenue MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $41,857.92. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $142,068.00 (1,894.24 trips x $75 = $142,068.00). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. 3. The Construction Mitigation Plan shall be revised to restrict haul hours to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The revised Construction Mitigation Plan shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of Construction Permits. . CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-034,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT NAME: Union Plaza Shopping Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3904 NE 4th Avenue LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on May 06, 1997. Written comments and requests for reconsideration shall be forwarded to Development Services Division, Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on May 13, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval (SA). If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. PUBLICATION DATE: April 21, 1997 DATE OF DECISION: April 15, 1997 SIGNATURES: fi Gregg Zirr�Ferm4n;Administrator DATE De artm�nf Planning/Building/Public Works P y/ 75 S Chastain,—Administrator D Community Service Depart t 7,27 Le9Wtr ,eler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC • • • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING , POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION ' PROJECT NAME: UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-034,SA,ECF Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices,consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,498 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. Location: 3904 NE 4th Ave. • AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. IXXX I YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON MAY 06. 1997 OR APPEAL • THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,MAY 06, 1997. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. I A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR • MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON,ON MAY 13,1997 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL (SA). IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED,THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD • AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. • • • II I It • • • • • ` c Z NE STREET • • 'MAMMAL'FOR UNION PIMA OWING CLYTF,$ O a =-e I r • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling"for proper file identification. • • • I s h JGt c- cdY1 hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted'b me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . April l°►, i�l�1. • Signed: Sa:II4, • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) 1,,""it I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 5,41uf b signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volt) pectcforthe uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ° • P P of t�;•. y Dated: L�/�1/9171/1(g/a4-it � .• _Notary Pubin and the Stale,ofrWashington• Notary (Print) MA-R'- '= � �L�2 My appointment expires: (/[l� • NOTARY.DOC i � I 1[1:0 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER ,PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-034,SA,ECF Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. Location: 3904 NE 4th Ave. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. XXX YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON MAY 06. 1997 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, MAY 06, 1997. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON MAY 13, 1997 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL (SA). IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. rizegg_ IIIII Y ViliU R' �IIIiL�� 1�111.� .- 111 mum R-IG Hg ,� En RM-I R-IG Ma 1 IP I RM G NE 4th 5T- ET WM Rb =nom " F.IMN . VICINITY MAP FOR UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER O IgO'R , FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER whencailing'for.proper;fi,Ce denti ication / I STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE April 15, 1997 I Project Name Union Plaza Shopping Center Applicant Northwest Prompters File Number LUA-097-034, SA, ECF Project Manager Peter Rosen Project Description Proposal for a retail shopping center with offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total floor area of 80,496 square feet. The buildings face toward the interior parking area. Building A is oriented along a north/south axis on the west part of the site. Building A includes approximately 17,182 square feet of retail space on the first floor and 19,203 square feet of office area on the second floor. Building B is setback from NE 4th Avenue at the north end of the parking lot. Building B is proposed to include a 22,427 square foot grocery store and 5,018 square feet of retail area on the first floor and approximately 3,000 square feet of second story office space over the retail portion of the building. Buildings C and D are oriented north/south along the east property line, with a 20 foot wide corridor between the buildings. Building C is proposed as a 7,613 square foot restaurant and Building D includes approximately 9,053 square feet of retail space. The maximum building height would be 37 feet 10 inches above finish grade. Access to the site is proposed via two driveway entries off NE 4th Avenue. The applicant is proposing a total of 346 parking spaces. Project Location 3904 NE 4th Avenue Exist. Bldg. Area gsf NA Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf 80,496 s.f. Site Area 254,698 s.f., 5.85 acres Total Building Area gsf 80,4986 s.f. RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated, u` s I 1 1 \'` ..----'1-0' :--'FiS z:-/R=.-i." - NI :T I ! I. iI E mi ,. E- i1 E_ _1 ;^ I eO eC I Ziii 7 E:-o Q as:0 o 1 i z :s CJ _ NE 4th STREET II E-g 1 i is i I. Project Location Map iii I ERCRPT.DOC E= . I City ofRenton PB/PWDepartment I mmental Review Committee Staff Report UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF REPORT OFAPRIL 15,1997 Page 2 of 6 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 15 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 15 da A eal Period. • Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 15 day Appeal Period. followed by a 15 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $41,857.92. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $142,068.00 (1,894.24 trips x$75 = $142,068.00). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. 3'. The Construction Mitigation Plan shall be revised to restrict haul hours to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The revised Construction Mitigation Plan shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of Construction Permits. ERCRPT.DOC ,City of Renton PB/PWDepartment 1 ',mental Review Committee Staff Report UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTEk' LUA-97-034,SA,ECF REPORT OFAPRIL 15,1997 Page 3 of 6 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING 1. Soils report does not contain the analysis for potential for liquefaction as required by the Uniform Building Code, 1994 Edition. Addendum is required. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flows for each building are: Building A-4,500 GPM, Building B- 5,250 GPM, Building C- 3,500 GPM, Building D-3,250 GPM. The primary fire hydrant for each building is required to be within 150 feet of the building. Additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of each building at the rate of one hydrant for each 1,000 GPM of required fire flow or portion thereof. For example, Building B would require 6 hydrants; one within 150 feet and 5 additional hydrants within 300 feet. 2. The fire flow for Building B may not be available in the watermains serving this area. If not,the type of construction can be changed to lower the required fire flow. The preliminary fire flows were calculated on type V N construction. 3. Sprinkler systems are required in Buildings A and B. Building C and D may be required to be sprinklered if they are serving alcohol and have over 5,000 square feet of undivided floor area. Fire alarm systems will be based on the actual use of the building. 4. Separate plans and permits are required by the Fire Department for sprinkler, fire alarm system and hood suppression systems for restaurants. PLAN REVIEW Water Watermain extension, fire hydrants and DDCV assembly's (building, fire control systems will be required and must meet current fire codes/regulations. Water meters for domestic/irrigation will be required sized to meet UPC requirements. Water system development charges (SDC) fees of$0.113 per square foot of gross site area will be required. Transportation Street improvements- NE 4th Street has existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and street lights. New access driveways to the site will be required and they must meet current City Codes/Standards. Sanitary Sewer I The Site will require an extension of the sanitary sewer system to reach the proposed buildings within the site. Side sewer connections will be required and the cost is$80 per connection. Sanitary sewer(SDC) fees will be required at $0.078 per square foot of gross site area. Storm Drainage The site will require a storm drainage and temporary erosion control plan with design in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City. Detention/biofiltration will be required via a drainage swale, pond or wet vault. Surface water(SDC) fees will be required at$0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface on the site. POLICE The highest number of commercial burglaries and thefts are from construction sites. Police recommend that the applicant fence in the lot with security fencing while the site is under construction, and use security lighting as well. Tools will need to have the model and serial numbers recorded, to aid in recovery if they are stolen. If a construction site trailer is used as an office, it will need heavy duty dead-bolt locks and auxiliary locks, plus metal bars over any windows,to help prevent entry by a thief. The buildings need heavy duty dead-bolt locks on all exterior doors, and security lighting around the building and in the parking lot. An alarm system is also highly recommended. ERCRPT.DOC ,City of Renton PB/PWDepartment 1 7nmental Review Committee Staff Report UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF REPORT OFAPRIL 15,1997 Page 4 of 6 AIRPORT Requires submittal of Notice of Proposed Construction for determination of lighting/marking requirements or determination of hazard or obstacle. Result of FAA review should be reviewed prior to issuance of Building Permit. PLANNING Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? 1. Earth Impacts: The site consists of gentle slopes ranging between 6%to 15%. The applicant proposes to grade the front portion of the site along NE 4th Street and to use the cut material to fill the man-made gully at the rear of the site. The applicant has not indicated that amount of soil material that would be graded for the proposal or if additional fill or cut material would be imported/exported to the site. The site is currently wooded and it would be cleared of all trees for the shopping center development. Erosion could occur during the construction phase of the project. Potential erosion impacts would be mitigated by City Codes which require the applicant to provide a Construction Mitigation Plan and require a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) prior to issuance of Construction Permits. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: NA 2) Air Impacts Impacts to air quality can be anticipated during construction and after occupancy of the proposed project. Impacts during construction would include increased levels of airborne particulates (especially dust) from disturbance of exposed soils. Construction impacts would be short term in nature and would be mitigated through best management practices of the required TESCP and with the Construction Mitigation Plan. Emissions from construction equipment exhaust would have a minor impact on local air quality. Exhaust from construction vehicles is regulated by State and City Codes. After construction the impacts would be associated primarily with vehicle exhaust from customer and employee traffic. Vehicle emissions are regulated by the State of Washington. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA 3) Water Impacts The project site is located at the crest of two drainage basins. No off-site drainage enters the site. There are no surface water bodies or wetlands that the applicant has identified on the site. The proposal would result in impervious surface coverage of approximately 85% of the site area. The proposed storm drainage system would utilize an underground pipe detention system at both the north and south ends of the site. These pipes are designed to restrict flows to the existing runoff rates, and designed for the standard ERCRPT.DOC •City of Renton PB/PWDepartment 1. ',mental Review Committee Staff Report UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF REPORT OFAPRIL 15,1997 Page 5 of 6 2/10/100-year design storm as required by the 1990 King County Surface Water Manual. Water quality for the Project would be provided by dead storage and sediment storage in the bottom of the detention pipes. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA 4) Fire Protection Impacts The proposal would add new construction to the City which would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee applies to all new construction. The required mitigation fee is based on a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. For the proposed development the fee is tentatively estimated at $41,857.92 (80,496 square feet X $0.52 = $41,857.92). The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that Building Permits are issued. Mitigation Measures The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $41,857.92. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting Ordinance, SEPA Ordinance. 5) Transportation Impacts Access to the project is proposed via two driveways off NE 4th Street. These driveway cuts are separated by approximately 165 feet. The proposal would result in an increase in traffic trips and therefore would be subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is calculated to be $75 per each average daily trip attributable to the project. City staff has estimated that the project would generate a total of 1,894.24 new average daily trips. Therefore, the Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at$142,068.00 (1,894.24 trips x$75= $142,068.00). The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan which describes the hauling and transportation routes to the site and states that construction would be performed between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Construction-related truck traffic could impact traffic flows if occurring during AM or PM peak traffic flows. This truck traffic should be limited to off-peak hours. Mitigation Measures The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at$142,068.00 (1,894.24 trips x$75= $142,068.00). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. the Construction Mitigation Plan shall be revised to restrict haul hours to between 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. The revised Construction Mitigation Plan shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of Construction Permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance, Transportation Mitigation Fee Ordinance 6) Land and Shoreline Use Impacts The subject site is zoned Center Suburban (CS) and the proposed uses are permitted in the CS zoning designation. The proposal is consistent with adopted zoning and the Comprehensive Plan. There are no land use impacts anticipated to result with the proposal. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department I mmental Review Committee Staff Report UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA-97-034,SA,ECF REPORT OFAPRJL 15,1997 Page 6 of 6 E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report.. ERCRPT.DOC • • IQtIU(.ENALtEV(EVI►»COI�111 . .............• ..•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•:........................:.........................:::::......... ...::::::.... • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Sam Chastain, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jim Hanson & Mike Kattermann :ril:>:1Aiiii 1:997::>::»:»>:»»»>:>:>:::: :>>:::: »»:<::>::>::::>::::<::<::::>::><::<::<:::>:<::>:::>»:<::>:::>»»>::>»:>::<::::::>::>::::>:::::::::><:>::>::»::>» :>:<::>:::>:<iie :IVle�et�n :Date:.>:«::>;>:<:<: ::Tues..:� :�:...:. .::.......... ................................................................................................................................................................... :.:::;;:::>:.:;.:.:;:.>;:.::.::::.;:.;»:... oor. o::fe .e::. e..R .o :::>:>:>:>::>::>:>::>: :»:<: :;:»:>: ::>:»: .Lo.cat'.an,......................:..::.Thin):.��.......:.C....�.....1'....r1�. ......o...i1n.........................................:.........:....::.:::.::::::.�:.:::::::.:.::..::......................................:.:::::.:::::::>:. ungmonmon . ......... .. . Agenda listed below. • Union Plaza Shopping Center(new) (Rosen) LUA-97-034,SA,ECF Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. Location: 3904 NE 4th Street. Nextel Communication Facility on NE 12th (new) (Powell) LUA-97-031,ECF,ACU,V The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review (ECF), Administrative Conditional Use (CU) Permit and a height Variance (V) in order to construct a 138 foot, 6 inch monopole tower in a multi-family residential zone. The project site is located in APA Zone 2. Location: 4715 NE 12th Street. _ Child & Adult Day Care Zoning & Parking Code (new) . (Grueter) LUA-97-037,ECF Environmental Review for proposed amendments to the Center, Commercial and Industrial Zones. The proposed amendments address both child and adult day care zoning and parking code amendments. Minor amendments are needed to provide consistency in how child day care uses are allowed in center and commercial zones. The primary child care amendment would be to allow child day care centers in the Center Neighborhood (CN) zone as a primary' permitted use,.consistent with allowances in other Center zones. Similar to child day care, adult day care (also known as adult day health) allows for the temporary care of adults who require some assistance or supervision. Adult day care/health typically provides daily supervision, social activities, and health services for elderly or disabled persons. Proposed code amendments would allow adult day care/health uses only in center, commercial, and industrial zones at this time. Adult day care/health uses would be required to comply with similar parking requirements as child day care uses. • • Streamlining SEPA Process (Discussion) (Huerter) • cc: . J.Covington,Executive Assistant to the Mayor, - AGENDA.DOC • L.Warren,City Attorney (R) F.Kaufman,Hearino Examiner . S.Carlson,Economic Development Director (R) J.Gray,Fire Prevention - • A.Larson,Fire (R) • • • Arhilecture•Engineering•Value Engineering•Construction Management 701 Dexter Avenue North 1301 A Seattle,Washington 98109 tel: (206)285 4300 DEVELOPMENT PL A OW Fax (206)285-4311 CITY I"�1n;�. 0 I. I C £moll oaci tl.com OE a Thp' A:50CIATES E� ; COMPANY RECEIVED April 9, 1997 Peter Rosen Project Manager City of Renton Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,Washington 98055 Re:Union Plaza Shopping Center Site Plan Approval LUA97-034,SA,BCP 3904 NE 4th Street Renton,Washington Dear Peter, Thank you for promptly returning my call inquiring as to whether or not any additional information would be required for our submittal for Site Plan Approval for this project.Per your request for clarifications on parking,building use,and setbacks,I have revised our site plan drawing to show the correct building use and parking analysis. With regard to the setbacks at the front property line,existing adjacent site conditions and fire department requirements made us realize that Building"A"and Building"D" should be located farther away from the property line(at the street)than the distance that the City of Renton Zoning Regulations requires. Building"D"is set back a distance of approximately 96'-0"from the property line,while Building"A"is set back approximately 86'-10"from the front property line.We preferred to locate Building"D"closer to the front property line,however we were prevented from doing this because of the close proximity of a retail building(on the adjacent site to the east) to the property line.The adjacent property to the east slopes toward our site and the existing retail building on that site is located extremely close(I to 2 feet away)from the shared property line.Had we located Building"D"closer to the front property line,we would have risked undermining the existing adjacent buildings foundation and we would have been required to create a very large retaining wall at this area, We felt that by locating Building"D"in its present location,we would eliminate the undermining danger and this would reduce the visual impact that a large retaining wall would have on the street view of our property.It is my understanding that the reason for the City of Renton's setback requirement is to help create a more pedestrian"friendly"and visually appealing strcctscape.To meet this goal,we have located landscape islands all along the front edge of our parking lot,both at the street(as required)and at the front edge of our main parking field In addition,we will add sidewalks and landscaped areas at the front of our property at both Building"A"and Buis "D"to create a more visually appealing and easier site access for pedestrians to our buildings_ At Building"A",we located our building in its present location to meet the City of Renton Fire Departmexct's requirement for fire truck access to all sides of this building.In order to"soften"the visual impact that a parking lot would create at this area,we have located landscaping peninsula's at each end of the parking area immediately south of Building"A",In addition,our landscape architect has place an 18" high berm(with planting)at the landscaped area adjacent to the front property line.This plantirng material on this berm is identified on the landscaping legend as 12 to 14 feet high red maple trees and de:X.66' • i _) ,.J S/I•d 0EE•ON Wd20:2 2.66I'6 -e1dJ 2 feet high laurel.We feel that this landscaping will create a visually appealing edge/screen to the parking lot area which was created by the Fire Department's requirement for access to all sides of Building"A". In talking with you earlier,you mentioned that our Site Plan Approval would be viewed more favorably by members of the Environmental Review Committee if we were to improve pedestrian access to the buildings on the site.Enclosed is a copy of the partial plan that shows the new sidewalks and planting areas that have been added per your suggestion.I have also eliminated a parking space in front of Building"C"and Building"D"and have added an access walkway from the parking lot to the central part of each building,I have also enclosed a partial plan which shows this revision.I have included a revised Project Data chart which shows the correct number of parking spaces and the parldng ratios which were used in calculating the required number of spaces.The original Project Data did not include the 3,000 square feet Office area at the upper level of Building"B"and this revised Project Data Chart correctly shows this revision. Peter,I hope that this letter communicates our intentions for varying from the setback requirements,as well as our efforts to create the visually appealing streetscape that the City of Renton desires for property in this building zone.Please contact me if you need revised Site Plans which show all of the revisions mentioned above. If I can be of any further assistance,please feel free to contact me, Thank you very much. Best' gards, C• J. Colson AIA CTC/tbmn c 77•a PPS'•nri Wd20:2 2.66T.6 •e1dd I . :::::::::::,-,--_-:::: A ' I.,t•-••-ito. -... •.;,, • t �\\\\\ `:\\ \\\,,\\\\`� ✓% • II \ � \i\ �\`,\\� r7 . • COMPACT \\\\'<\\'['\\ .\\\\:, r;• _ . . .., ,. 1 COMPACT k,--...,N..mt:L.,wNm. .: A . • C , ,s:, I OMPACT _\:`\ \� ..„ • ,,:s \\„ / ,___/ . . . , \, .„ ,..,,, ,....„...„... ....:.,, Nt COMPACT 0 %:' . . \\\\\\ • •• .�^ Di NC • ` \ \ .\`\ \\\\ \\\\` \ f� • e=j AR5 31 C,4i�5 ' �N\k\\�;\\\\\:\\ :- 9'x20' PI \ I\.\ \ \` \� 1 COMPACT w •:•.m\, �' caMPAcr II '\�\`'z•• -.�:f S\\ \\: / CQI7PACT •I •�\ .\�\\ \�\\�\\ = \ :'� s\,\\\\ \ •/ •Q \, , s \e \\ ::_� to I cOMPAcT I' \\; '• ,\ \ i\\\ \\� . • . I COMPACT L ; • • 1 \ {Fy'• ‘•\\n •N„\\r,.. 4:3:-:•:-. > c.ompACT ii- \.\,. s ',`,7,...,,, \ ,, ,,c,b....../ ,-i, COMPACT :\``N\\:\• \\\\\`..\ .•.-.:.-V-% „, • 4 . tI II ,,,\',:'' ,� _�� 2 '_Or_0 ;\ `. j�,� fir:\,\ •. i ,,''1 \;\\ .: \• \\• \'\\\\• ♦\' \ , :._-... ,, ..."....._. _ . ............ _ D •T. Od c,P a aap nu WdzO:Z L661•6 •zidt3 n \ v i m m m 0 j . \\'\ " CCI PlLT fill \ \\ . \\\\ \ \ 1) 1 ' - 1 \ . 1\ .; 7 �' \: ��\� i� 2d-0� ?d-m 4e"-rv- 2d-mom Z4-0' ! \'\, r �\ '':/ IcA ` a. �- pig �� ` d m)d8Th et @ F i � � --.-+�� ii 841A DNG F `� Q "' e'..t.;tii e}:i:: 0 om 1 GARS \� 8 ARS �\ 61 b�GARS �l ® ___ E.;4'Wi:'..;V.5:j•tz•t••4.•/ ):',. •A ; ,� 0 9 0` � \ n 9 CARS a 9'x20' $-6 x i6 ry CARS ' Nat", , 32 -® r ligriv- .. 1 0„„,..._-. • i HOLE — -it ' — -a`�-NEUJ 8° SEWER LINE '1 SYSTEM N.E. 41I-1 AVE. a E _ 0 NEW 8" SELLER LINE ` EXISTING 12" UJATER LINE a.Cc) 0' WIDE SIDEWALK ~— (L -0' PLANTING STRIP • N m m CITY OF RENTON ZONING CLASSIFICATION CS TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE SITE: 254,658 SF. TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE 13UILDINGEs RETAIL SPACE BUILDING "A" 11,182 SF.• BUILDING "B" 5,018 SF. RETAIL TOTAL 22200 S.F. OFFICE SPACE BUILDING "A" 9,916 SF. BUILDING "13" 3,000 SF. OFFICE TOTAL 12,916 SF. R!r$T RANT SPACE BUILD1NCs "A" 9,281 S.F. BU1LDNG "C" 1613 5F. BUILDING "D" 9,053 5F. RESTAURANT TOTAL 25,953 SF. CGraO EEET_ SPAcE BUILDING "13" 22,421 5F. PROJECT TOTAL 63,496 S.F. TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF l5LDG.FOOTPRINTS: 61,293 SF. PERCENTAGE OF LOT COVERAGE: 24Z PARKING ANALYSIS LUWEN OFFICE AND'RESTAURANT SPACE ARE INCLUDED . WITHN A SWOPPING CENTER TWE PARKING REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE THAT FOR A SWOPPING CENTER OUR PARKING CALC JLATtON9 ARE BASED UPOu BETWEI 4 4 ANP SPACES PER TWOUSAND SQUARE FEET OF SPADE. 83,496 5F. DIVIDED BY 1000 = 83.496 83.496 TIMES 4 SPACES PER THOUSAND = 334 SPACES REQ. FULL SIZE SPACES PROVIDED 312 (9'-0" x 20'-0") COMPACT SIZE SPACES PROVIDED 23 (8'-6" x l6'-0") HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SPACES 1 (PER W,4.C. 5120 STANDARDS) PARKING SPACE TOTAL 342 (4.1 SPACES PER 1000 SF) SQUARE FOOTAGE OF INTERIOR LOT LANDSCAPING 1,112 SF. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ALL OTHER LANDSCAPING 30981 SF. ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT 50'-0" I ROPOSED 6UrL.DING HEIGHT 36'-0" REQUIRED SETBACKS 15' .B FRONT 15' a SIDES 15' 41REAR PROPOSED SETBACKS 85' s FRONT 15' Q SIDES 35' REAR cic-A RPF"ON WdPO:2 L66T'6 -Zldti City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Transportation Comments Due: 4/3/97 Application No.: LUA 97-034, SA,ECF Date Circulated: 3/20/97 Applicant: Northwest Prompters Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Union Plaza Shopping Center Work Order No: 78194 Location: 3904 NE 4th Street Site Area: 254,698 s.f. (5.85 ac) Building Area(gross): 80,496 s.f. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments B. Policy-Related Comments C. Code-Related Comments Street improvements (NE 4th Street) has existing curbs, gutters, sidewalk, street paving and street lights. New access driveways to the site will be required and they must meet current City Codes/Standards. A study will be required to provide trip generation,AM/PM peak traffic volumes and splits to and from the site. A traffic mitigation fee of$75 per daily trip will be required. y 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date grnfldr • ,S-rY 0 + 414:RO + �" �:%�•.C »or�o► ILI Ya.� � . . .:. .::..:•."y :MSc'�+�iai�iv �yiaia�y�oq .:e�rin+.iw+oa+l�. ' e ^ ` u Project Name al i o vi P lazq S IiO p1 (cm-fey Project3a0 E t� Address' y N � 57"veet Contact Person Guy.! Co Isom ) OII1t1.1 pic, Assoc,4tr$ C Address 701 De,cf<✓ .Ave jU ) 41301 5eat(It c810q Phone Number 2 8 5 - 4 300 Permit.Number 1-U A - cf 1 - 0 31-} Project Description Re 5i10 I�1 p ' � pP t..y - 4 hle/y sr � 346 eke/ SPacEs 22,200 cZ,a! 25,R53 Re-tai I - 5.". O ice - 1rlr e5 s. i- Re57auve 1l )23,1414 ecv>.r,{ Gvocev(i - 22.) L 2 1 s.f. jorta 1 ' -6 Land Use Type: ; Method__of Calculation: ❑"Residential /TE Trip Generation Manual 13 Retail 0 Traffic Study [ "Non-retail 0 Other Calculation: c-ee attached Sheet 1Z-e.vl,c4 4/Iq/e7 I Vgy.2.4 u,2u) ctGI/ta f 5 20'4Z. fit kswtvif 68 DD ;53, ZI$. 25 A),e u- 4/m/7 Transportation Mitigation Fee: 4 - D- /53i 21 Y.Z 5 Calculated by: /4xif 4(4 I Date: Oh Account Number: Date of Payment .. c • IMP Transportation Mitigation Fee Calculation Union Plaza Shopping Center Average Daily Net New ITE Code Trips per Primary Trips Sq. Ft Average Daily 1,000 sq.ft. (%) Proposed Trips Retail 820 75.62 trips 25% 22,200 sq.ft. . 419.69 trips Office 710 23.65 trips 100% 12,916 sq.ft. 305.46 trips Restaurant 831 81.61 trips 29% 25,953 sq.ft. 614.23 trips Grocery 850 125.48 trips 25% 22,427 sq.ft. 703.53 trips TOTAL 2042.91 trips * Retail figures (average daily trip rate) based on Shopping Center, using curve equation from page 1234 based on total size of center(all uses) * Office trip rates from Table 4,page 942 (using extrapolation). * Restaurant trip rates based on assumption as Quality Restaurant (page 1249 -by equation), which is lowest trip generator for restaurant designations. * Grocery trip rates based on estimated value for weekday daily trips, based on ratios established between peak rates and daily rates on weekends. Manual only lists peak hour values for weekdays. Same trip generation values used for Safeway store on NE 4th St. * . Assumptions for primary trips for various uses (thereby discounting pass-by and diverted trips), are based on values used for Safeway project, derived from information provided in the ITE Manual. Based on mitigation fee of$75 per net new average daily trip: ($75)X(2042.91 daily trips)= $153,218.25• UNPLZ-2.DOC\ • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works • ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1701kc,c, COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-034,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 3/20/97 APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen 131354JECT TITLE: Union Plaza Shopping Center - WORK ORDER NO: 78194 LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 254,698 s.f. (5,85 ac) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 80,496 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of'4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS ,Ne14 Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services \J Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet I- (, a, DI ICe calls e I i tho CLn n U_C(,l Li I 19( ed 017'1 4 06 ( �-' This area of Renton reports a high number of commercial burglary, robberies and thefts from vehicle types of reports. To help prevent these kinds of, crimes , the businesses will all need solid-core exterior doors. Back doors will need peeop-holes for employee safety, to aid in the observation of the back alley-ways. Security lighting will need to be in place around the exteriors of all the buildings , especially in the back sides. Access to the hark of the B.' POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS buildings should be limited- preferably. with security fencing. After the businesses have closed this area could -become dangerous due to the lack of natural surveillance by business . merchants. This area of Renton also reports .a high number.of-drug-related activity incidents , such as drug sales in parking lots. Recommend that the landscaping that covers the exterior property line of the property be 'thinned out and replaced with chain-link fencing instead Or in addition to the landscaping. Because of the lack of visibility around and behind the businesses , criminals_.could be tempted to congregate in these areas for drug related crimes or to attempt to break into the businsses 'via the back doors. By eliminated the excess land- C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS scaping and providing chain-link fencing, visibility will be greatly improved- thus allowing other,merchants or customers to keep an eye on the property. Each. back door to each. business will need auxiliary locking devices in addition to heavy-duty dead-bolt locks (such as a latch guard and pry-resistant cylinder around the lock) . Each business needs a security alarm system. Security lighting will need to be maintained in the parking areas , as well as surrounding each. building. We:have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. _ /74 --Sign(JOf Director o Aut orized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 RENT ON rtr i- �sP FIRr.-. FvFi�T1Or' U . City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works MAR 2 0 1997 • ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SET Vi jjV : REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ��r� - COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-034,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 3/20/97 APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen R, 4JECT TITLE: Union Plaza Shopping Center _ WORK ORDER NO: 78194 • LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 254,698 s.f. (5,85 ac) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 80,496 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use • Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet r/l/0Q r ®r .4-#.1-pa c f5 /dd le.yo • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • 'V • • • • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS & Le • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas.in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad.done!information is need properly assess this proposal. c. 3 'i 9 • Si. . 're of Director or Authorized Repres 7/tative Date DE r•.DOC Rev.10/93 &Icy G� . CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: March 21, 1997 TO: Peter Rosen, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal `? SUBJECT: Union Plaza Shopping Center, 3904 NE 4th St. Fire Department Comments: 1.The preliminary fire flows for each building are ; Building A- 4500 GPM, Building B- 5250 GPM, Building C- 3500 GPM, Building D- 3250 GPM. The primary fire hydrant for each building is required to be within 150 feet of the building. Additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of each building at the rate of one hydrant for each 1000 GPM of required fire flow or portion thereof. Example, Building B would require 6 hydrants, one within 150 and 5 additional hydrants within 300 feet. 2. The fire flow for Building B may not be available in the watermains serving this area..If not, the type of construction can be changed to lower the required fire flow. The preliminary fire flows were calculated on type V N construction. 3. Sprinkler systems are required in building A and B. Buildings C and D may be required the be sprinkled if they are serving alcohol and have over 5,000 square feet of undivided floor area. Fire alarm systems will be based on the actual use of the buildings. 4. Separate plans and permits are required by the Fire Department for sprinkler, fire alarm system and hood suppression systems for the restaurants. 5. The required fire mitigation fees based on $.52 a square foot are: Building A- $18,922.22 Building B- $15,854.80 Building C- $3,961.88 J Building D- $4,707.56 Please feel free to contact this office if you have any questions City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Plan Review-Water Comments Due: 4/3/97 Application No.: LUA 97-034, SA, ECF Date Circulated: 3/20/97 Applicant: Northwest Prompters Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Union Plaza Shopping Center Work Order No: 78194 Location: 3904 NE 4th Street Site Area: 254,698 s.f. (5.85 ac) Building Area(gross): 80,496 s.f. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments B. Policy-Related Comments C. Code-Related Comments Water Main extension, fire hydrants and DDCV assembly's (building fire control systems will be required and must meet current fire codes/regulations. Water meters for domestic/irrigation will be required sized to meet UPC requirements. Water system development charges (SDC)fees of$0.113 per square foot of gross site area will be required. Signature of Director or Aut o Representative Date g grnfldr City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Surface Waste Water Comments Due: 4/3/97 Application No.: LUA 97-034, SA, ECF Date Circulated: 3/20/97 Applicant: Northwest Prompters Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Union Plaza Shopping Center Work Order No: 78194 Location: 3904 NE 4th Street Site Area: 254,698 s.f. (5.85 ac) Building Area(gross): 80,496 s.f. A. Environmental Impact(e.g. Non-Code) Comments B. Policy-Related Comments C. Code-Related Comments The Site will require an extension of the sanitary sewer system to reach the proposed buildings within the site. Side sewer connections will be required and the cost is $80 per connection. Sanitary sewer (SDC) fees will be required at $0.078 per square foot of gross site area. The site will require a storm drainage and temporary erosion control plan with design in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City. Detention/biofiltration will be required via a drainage swale, pond or wet vault. Surface water (SDC) fees will be required at $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface on the site. ra ��n� 4'— / — 97 Signature of Director or uthorized Representative Date grnfldr F: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works • ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: IRIALs COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-034,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 3/20/97 APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen R JECT TITLE: Union Plaza Shopping Center WORK ORDER NO: 78194 LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street • SITE AREA: 254,698 s.f. (5,85'ac) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 80,496 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s!f.with 346 parking spaces. Access,would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary • Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use • Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet .11?,e'U a4e_ flu B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS vtpay,4 • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS '12.vLQ- tee- / 2C' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. //zi/97 Sig ure of Director or Authorized Represen ative Da DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City_. ..enton Department of Planning/Building/P._. Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: i ct' r1 COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-034,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 3/20/97 APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen IigaJECT TITLE: Union Plaza Shopping Center WORK ORDER NO: 78194 LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 254,698 s.f. (5,85 ac) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 80,496 s.f. • SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth V Housing V Air V Aesthetics V Water V Light/Glare ` - Plants V Recreation ✓ Land/Shoreline Use Utilities V Animals V Transportation V Environmental Health ✓ Public Services V Energy/ ✓ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet / 14,000 Feet �/ gevockD LEVEL AT s t T E tZ 40e it L ( A$ctll 0@46. (-Eva.), aPoUKb 4 ratG v4ccge`1 s 279r A15L comeaL SURF izL.am1litcM . (.32 tuK©t/Nc. AUQ +. 1 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS lc. t ve tle is 4-D2. P.M tT isto,8/45-1.1g5 05$ ,lks Co WPAert6 t.$ UJkiri dPSPAcl-t ©P WQc i - /MAID Ce5518 1^ert C�-`[1t't6 4tQeQA"r. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 0-Quali3 3U814LTTAL Ooc- 4o`i tQ$ PeOP ,D ce)W5t ucv tOM Tog- ' »-i EirstrI ATAV cc- Ldc6lCotGt 14.412.i4I14G W4.'i'5 oil$DUL�Ut .p �2C �iDspuA�lc �` SL/Jt� Q,�sLwT o� �rA,A .29UtEu) 5t4o c.A ?e2.14Sr. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ifional informa .is needed to property assess this proposal. \it —i 0 . 0 ' if 1A1121" 241 t177- Signatu f Director or Authorized Representative Date • DEVAPP I• Rev.10/93 %.".. 4' 11 -mg - ) V. t1- E F '• ,...... 4, . gi �� a -/ , V' --- . x -.,.. ( . . , � 4. a ',� (\� . .r o a _ ,awt \oi,p / .4 \ . •\ +No&„, ...,--4. i . la it. gi 1 "ClUiallir �Ali �� ihig ..fi ' __ „, :r__, i�� f .rat ____ Ii \-- ,3., . ef Vair 1 1 !Tillii ilt I 1-4 1 I rAir: m m J. rill, �� . , ,E E A NEI t:� Vail A A ;" --,•--::_,_. vive., isTOTre'' ."‘ '-' 4"-Itr4". '-- '-- 10.1tilegilillEtrA iii17-jhu iihk4tik`, ‘k.' ' Al- e.ma -17N 1 i a— Q,..t .,itS2,4141ww , 41 AP . : a N P110 �I�3 Jet A �,� --T��D �® �� •� \ -Ii 111.OI . s rii„, �, �J �.�l it'` �`�t 11-E-Ail\.-..�M�� .. I11� T.11,1;rdl Mee 'BE- k % ril © ►� a o= pair, •, sl:�.,llt MCO 12 AJ fir_ - o,�/ , 411 ' Mit %Tr •�.zp k.+14 �' j�j�:�� Sri-, © � r . I t tf It ma •�� I��,l�� °� ,.�. '��, � � y®(rnIlam)ti—— )==,_ � �. - J..01,1 a 1ut va-r_ , / La ogoato. R= ( � ,C _ W T i t . I� TA: Yal O®� �� AI �t '�INI tq_"11b I.' d . +xt0 � � -- rtsUM I ti a ..�� [ri 7 •ar liellil O Iuuart Oa..r.MhTrim._ n i14,, JIitT, �\� - Ya9� ' - -- v �Q �`J .Ial �' f . � FZIA WAS I a cII, '� -�a..r -- _ lL:®lJ C7Cu1 I� y1b �C - *-* liPirn.„ - 3:1 141:1. glini-. NI -_-.74::::::::::::-Z-7.-- --:-:::*:Kf.:*::_:*-17:17::_:__Niii elijACICV04.4 4v,,,.,,c-- 7 „, or aii.,r4:61,• „1 , . ., . . ,, F __;„:::::::::„:33::-,-::::::„=„:::::::::::::::-_,..„:::___tr„,..,,,.., ,ok .N,,,,iii-,,, ( ic___ , .1 .- ailummi • i x pail ,\ -2-1:::::32-Eafr-::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,--::::::::::::::.1_‘ k 6 awl-n-113 5. ivr- "- 14 11"' . ` Ai 11 • *1.• t k t-_-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:: E__:::__E_EE_:_:__:__:___:__:_:-__:_:-_:-_:__:-_:_.:__:__:__:_:_:____:_\ ..,Nk..,,,,.--,..,,,A, ,v ainnnn a i i E.,,..._ , ,gui.40111 --. -0.- 1,,_,,,ou_, la EA 1 If.1 N ----.K::E=E=E=E:Ef;_-::::::_:::_f:::::E:.]:._:::::::::::_f:::_:_:::::-:::;::::_:::_f_-:_=::=2.7:::::::::__,,,. ,s. ,v,,,,,k .ILJULJUIlt.ci- iliAtiq Bali c,...m.o. _ ilk& ::::,_ _ . \ _ _ _ = — __ _ :J fr m >r '' t �i Bill. r.w =• ai " a a ___====1= =-rE= __=-_ __ __=r==_ -__ _ f :.7.2t:, 4,i, 6 lai 115 II" 6 OM � �� ill _ ow�� _ III�,��" . © . 1 -____ ___-= _____=__=___=_____=__=________==_=__=__=11H4 N. :..:::=:EE::::77-4.0C1452Cff_::::::::::::::::::aalt::::::ftli: _=_=_ _ ,�1 ,,,,,.._.,_„ ,,. _ .,,, 1-::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-:::::-:-:-::::::::__:-::::::::::::::::::__::::::-i::::::::_::::___ 8 1 ii....!0; , _______ SW IL---..'- -s - 2111=;"-•••:1:, .. :-X-7.-Z-:-.7-.7-:-_-_--------------------------------------------:-:-:-------:-%--:-:-:-:-:--__::::::-_-_-_,_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ i I hog,a 4---1_, k I illaii . liraillimmi Oak. iti graz ----Y -:::::::::::::::::::::- -:::_:K=K:EufK::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::22::::::::EkK:E=E:Ef-:-:_:_::::::__:::::::Ea:E.:Es_.:- 7:::::::-..a:E:E:Es_.:E::- :;E:E:E:E: i'1 S �_ 1_ - -- -_ ____-- _____ __- ___-r_= -_- = P VrIu \:iHrJ -. i i Jig---====-'- A, e • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works • ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Covisetivichet& Se1UIC,G i COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-034,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 3/20/97 r;ryy OF RENTON APPLICANT: Northwest Prompters PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen FigaJECT TITLE: Union Plaza Shopping Center WORK ORDER NO: 78194 MAR 2 n 1997 LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street SITE AREA: 254,698 s.f. (5,85 ac) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 80,496 s.f. ..SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS • Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information • Impacts Impacts Necessa Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use • Utilities , Animals Transportation 'Environmental Health Public Services - Energy/ Historic/Cultural • Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet • 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 56 r! s R 0 IT U be5 b D f ail) TA 110 11.4, 1\AAt'{5[5 1og. Pr. T1Au1ihLi MR UI ) • Pis R6 [Rt..° B 1 Tu 1OPJ1A El 6l LO 16/ (b1 .1 . . qq1q6114 Lt L lT(u11) DoW. 1.5 R Q01 f:D . • q.xxpme_ngogramomixamm . • B. Soils report does not contain the analysis for peotential for liquefaction as required by the Uniform Building Code, 1994 Editon, Addendum is required. C. CODE RELATED COMMENTS: NONE. We have - e• ri:applic• o with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where :•• , A i o /d-dto properly assess this proposal. / ( f I, 1 3.2142 Signature• •irector or Auth• zed Representative Date DEVAPP.D e C Rev.10/93 ti`SY O ,L © � - �Jl INTO REVISED NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Approval (SA), and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Union Plaza Shopping Center LUA97-034,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. GENERAL LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit • The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. Additional Information: The date of Tuesday, May 13, 1997 at 9:00 AM has been tentatively set for a public hearing to review the Site Plan Approval (SA). The hearing before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. iN = 4," I 1!b•A,11CC , 111 ' $ R-8' "el i i 11 -8 '1�111 = R-10 II II Id R 10 11112311.111 R-24 R1-1 I HF Pn 1�-4ev it R-10 Eon z i 1 RM-C Q oCS NE 4th STREET c5 R-8 — P-I CZ GENMALOT.DOC —I - ttSd /XI I 11 R-10 _ r . Rich?fd.Farage Safeway,Inc. Texaco,Inc PO Box 3731 15350 SW Sequoiia Pkwy#300 PO Box 7813 Bellevue,WA 98009 Portland,OR 97224 Universal City, CA 91618 James&Judith Tokarsyck Tosco Corporation Mat Malaspina&Co 1203 Pierce Place NE 72 Cummings Point Road 309 S Cloverdale St#C1 Renton,WA 98056 Stamford, CT 06902 Seattle,WA 98108 Robert Wroten FSF Crown Pt Association Drury Pickering 529 Union Ave NE 1 Harbor Drive#200 1362 N Bonnie View Acres Road Renton,WA 98059 Sausalito, CA 94965 Oak Harbor, WA 98277 Daniel Zike Arthur Swanson Prompters Limited 4004 NE 4th Street 4512 Talbot Rd S 3904 NE 4th Street Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98055 Renton, WA 98056 Larry Howe Sound Power&Light Ceatrice McNeil 14548 SE 51st Street PO Box 90868 517 Union Ave NE Bellevue,WA 98006 Bellevue,WA 98009 Renton,WA 98056 Norman&Joann Sundquist Robert&Carolyn Huffman James Fred&Donna Jean Dykes 4647 S 282nd St 12200 SE 18th Place 537 Union Ave NE Auburn,WA 98001 Auburn,WA 98005 Renton,WA 98056 R&S Investments Co Edward Tasca Lawrence Nieder • 2101 4th Ave#250 3936 Park Ave N 5363 S Kenyon St Seattle,WA 98121 Renton,WA 98056 Seattle, WA 98118 DEMO Corp Donald Palmer Donald Maletta PO Box 2078 351 Union Ave NE 345 Union Ave NE Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Daly Enterprises R 7 G Investments Union Salvage,Inc. 5626-126th Ave SE PO Box 1149 307 Lincoln Ave Bellevue,WA 98006 Renton,WA 980576 Kent, WA 98032 Maplewood Lane Assoc. 15245 Pacific Hwy S#L2 Seattle, WA 98188 S >::>::»::»»»::>::>::>::>::>:<: : <•:•:•<•<:> :«:>::;::>::»:>:::>:: .•l•t• l_OP..�.......5��...I.�>~S.i"31.0.....QN............................................................. SURROU • NDING ' C}PERT.::..::::::0.U1/( • PROJECT NAME: UAL GS QAk.A APPLICATION NO: 97"0341 SA The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER a.cifi • m adp• '4f4 •a • v�`�� CEO: • • rr P;AkE ' 1997 OEVELOPIVrt..• a'L INNING CITY OF • RENTON (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) • (Continued) • NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER I • i • • Applicant Certification I, { \ L__., , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: .` r • , .' • 0 City of Renton Technical Services Records ; . ,., . ► '. Title Company Records King County Assessors Records .i ,9. r w v sa• • g.7 P fied Datel 4L t�q '1 9' r` (Applicant) • • NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before rneJ a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, • residing at 1(0 142 5 5 E- /1f 5 a l- on the i k day of Ly?76 , 19 q7. Signed Yl ci-4-1 ,,- Pea- (Notary Public) 6_ 7 • ........Eor..0 tv • >:>::>::::>::<::«>::<::>::»:::<:r<<:::::::>;;::<;:::::<:s«:>:<:::>:::•::::;:<:>:>.:r::..:::>::>:::;::>:"" .:: .I ..A'TIO'.N:: EMAIL . . i .::: ...... ....:. .,.. i :<:tha: :iiotices:of::<•h:e'"":ro".os..d.� .............................. ..............c�.:to:;::::::::.:::. • • :::::::j;:{;:;isii:C�ii}:{:;.::isiti::?+'ri::i::::::!:::ii}:<v::�•�:iSi'�:.::•'S'?::::::n::)::il:ii`:%::+jij:i?{:::�iv:yi:j:ii:j.,,,�j�, �:' �>+ ;:L::::::!: ��'�`?::ss�'.::{:,'.:;+i�:i,:i::i:::':i'F.:: ...............................................................................................................: :.:............ i:i ii}}ii:f:iv:?i4i:"iiiii:h:"iiii:i•i:4:4i;�?iiii:Lv:i•n::.:}}iJiiii:?i:h:•i}i?iiiiiii�::::?iiiiiiii:•ii:4:4iiiiii::4:n};:�}}ii:•:i•:bii:•iii:•iiiiii:is:•i:•y}i}ii:^:hi}iiiiiiii:^i:4:ii:ii .. ...�...R................................................. ...................................:::::•:::..:::............................................:::::•w::::::::::...:.......:..:....:..::::n�::.�:::::ni'•iii::::::•:i::iiiiiiiii::::::.�.w. �•::}•:::::::::.•. •:.:%:i'•iiiiii:i:::•i::•::::::::::::::. I .::isj<?iii'isJi:::}iii:i:':S:'isti::::•:4:•isv:iiiiiiii::::i.:.iiiiiiiiii:4::i:!ii}iiii:ii:v:iii::i::i::i::i:Ji::iiJ:.:4::CKvii ' ............ nd:s.worns:b"e.fore.:rne"::::a:::N"aa.;:.,;::Publ:rc::>.. " rrdsfor:. ;:es::::.. e.>:. ::::..�::::::::" .::: tQ:::::::::.;:.;:. . .be.d.:a.::. :::::.:::::::::.::.:::::.::.::::::::..::..:..... r''?;.:::::::::::::::�.:::: :: ::::::::.:..:.� .:::::: :::..::::.....`'�..:::::::::.:: ::: .::::::::::::::...... ::w:.v:: ::::::::::•::::::::: .:::':::i v' ..::::::::::::::.�::::::::......:: .h'•.iiiiiii:L.i....:.•::::::::: y. :•: :. ::::�• :•i :: :::ti^ii'.ii}i}.':ti• '•i:"^�:ryi%: •.::i::: h:•i:•i::Li:;{:::{iii: ........ .......:.:.::..:::::.�:.:::::::::.:.............. r�:<the::>::>::»>:. ..;•:>:<:<::>::»:tla::::nf::::;.< '' 'i;��..�::>::>::>::;:;:�:.;:>:;...:...�.:.:�. .:::::::::::�.;:.;:. ........................ .... ..........::::::::.:.:....... ....... . . ....... .. ... listprcp.doc 6/9/ 0 REV 07/95 2 RTchartFaragc SAFEWAY It TEXACO INC-TAX DEPARTME PO Box 3731 15350 SW Sequoia Pkwy#300 PO Box 7813 Bellevue,WA 98009 Portland,OR 97224 Universal City,CA 91618 TEXACO INC-TAX DEPARTME James&Judith Tokarsyck TOSCO CORPORATION PO Box 7813 1203 Pierce PI NE 72 Cummings Point Rd Universal City,CA 91618 Renton,WA 98056 Stamford,CT.06902 MATT MALASPINA&CO INC MATT MALASPINA&CO INC 309 S Cloverdale St#C1 309 S Cloverdale St#C1 Seattle,WA 98108 Seattle,WA 98108 Robert Wroten FSF CROWN POINTE ASSOCIATE Drury Pickering 529 Union Ave NE 1 Harbor Dr#200 1362 N Bonnie View Acres Rd Renton,WA 98059 Sausalito,CA 94965 Oak Harbor,WA 98277 Daniel Zike Daniel Zike. Arthur Swanson 4004 NE 4th St 4004 NE 4th St 4512 Talbot Rd S Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98055 PROMPTERS LIMITED PARTNE PROMPTERS LIMITED PARTNE Larry Howe 3904 NE 4th St 3904 NE 4th St 14548 SE 51st St Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Bellevue,WA 98006 • Sound Power&Light Puget Richard Tilles Ccatrice McNeil • PO Box 90868 521 Union Ave NE 517 Union Ave NE Bellevue,WA 98009 Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98059 • Norman&Joann Sundquist TEXACO INC-TAX DEPARTME Robert&Carolyn Huffman 4647 S 282nd St PO Box 7813 12200 SE 18th PI Auburn,WA 98001 Universal City,CA 91618 Bellevue,WA 98005 Ccatrice McNeil James Fred&Donna Jean Dykes R&S INVESTMENT CO 517 Union Ave NE 537 Union Ave NE 2101 4th Ave#250 Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98059 Seattle,WA 98121 RE Wroten Edward Tasca Lawrence Nieder 529 Union Ave NE 3936 Park Ave N 5363 S Kenyon St • Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98056 Seattle,WA 98118 DEMO CORP Donald Palmer Donald Maletta PO Box 2078 351 Union Ave NE 345 Union Ave NE Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98059 DALY ENTERPRISES . Donald Palmer R 7 G INVESTMENTS 5626'126th Ave SE 351 Union Ave NE • PO Box 1149 Bellevue,WA 98006 Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98057 UNIQUE SALVAGE INC MAPLEWOOD LANE ASSOCIATES MATT MALASPINA&CO INC 307 Lincoln Ave 15245 Pacific Hwy S#L2 309 S Cloverdale St#C1 Kent,WA 98032 Seattle,WA 98188 Seattle,WA 98108 CIT't CIF RENTON to 1 \ Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tannerr,,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 20, 1997 Carl.J. Colson Olympic Associates Company 701 Dexter Ave N#301 Seattle, WA 98109 SUBJECT: Union Plaza Shopping Center LUA97-034,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Colson: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on April 15, 1997. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. The date of Tuesday, May 13, .1997 at 9:00 AM, has been tentatively set for a public hearing to review the Site Plan Approval (SA). The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chamber on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. Please contact me, at 235-2719, if you have any questions. Sincerely, ,;/&_\a2N_ Peter Rosen Project Manager • cc: Northwest Prompters ACCPTLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 This oaoer contains 50%recycled material.20%oost consumer I ♦ egD ru NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Approval (SA), and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Union Plaza Shopping Center LUA97-034,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. GENERAL LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. waft nu nnuimmllm R-8 , R-1111 Ihili1111 rai l = R-10 III III -8 R-ID MIN R-24 R1-I w•mI1_L N;Hne—r RI0 MOMIMMI in - ` \-z Cs as NE 4th STREET as R-8 cs Yd?LACS J CS P-I �I R-10' VICINITY MAP FOR UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER GENMALOT.DOC I • • • PENDING APPLICATION. • • PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA97-034,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: ' Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices,consisting of buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces.Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. . • GENERAL LOCATION: 3904 NE 41h Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit _Preliminary Fiat _Shalt Flat Conditional Uso Permit _Rezone XXX—Site Plan Approval XX% Environmental Review SPehorelinemil Conditional Use _Other Fill&Grade Permit _Shoreline Substantial _Other - Devetopmonl Perrnil The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. 'Comments will be accepted any lime prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative site plan approval.Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last dale of applicant's"Notice of Application"publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application,or If you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations,appeal'periods and/or the public hearing date(s)for this project,please contact the Development • Services Division at 235-2550. - Tho date of Tuesday,May 13.1997 al 9:00 AM,has been tentatively set for a public hearing to review the Site'Plan Approval(SA).The heanng,before Mr.Fred Kaufman,Renton Hearing Examiner,will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. ea I I . • • III LIg- - ' a.0 lira aIIIIIIi ill... .TM I $ ow 1�r1�Y�`.1� R I Y'Cl 0 stir J . lj�al: NE 4th 5T- T - na III n�'• , I _. Y I 211®. • • -WAN el SLOW,YAP FOE UNION PIA]A SHOPPING CI'vfFB , ®•arm ''' it PLEASE'INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION.-:,' .-. CERTIFICATION . I. SOt,i . ,)&GK.Sc1 r , hereby certify that 3 copies.of the above document were posted'by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on rYlafn v� ; ►, 1°[R'I • Signed: S� 90.0'l/1Un ' STATE OFWASHINGTON ) • ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ` l-AJ.L 1 ,'`•, L 119I signed this instrument'and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary"Ac4or the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. '.�`\\.'.• '� ;, . . .----7)1 Dated: �jb-/ �'� • I NotaryPublic' and for e Star pP�'Wa nirr Loh _ - -- Notary (Print) MA-R6A A '-;.�'•c {G L (AL L My appointment expires: (a/�I/qt • NOTARY.00C . N01-10E- PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER LUA97-034,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices,consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. GENERAL LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat Conditional Use Permit Rezone _XXX_Site Plan Approval _XXX_Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use Other Permit • Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's"Notice of Application" publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. The date of Tuesday, May 13, 1997 at 9:00 AM, has been tentatively set for a public hearing to review the Site Plan Approval(SA). The hearing, before Mr.Fred Kaufman,Renton Hearing Examiner,will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. . ��1Z1-1rt- a li i� 717 \\ A ..+,.. .., ii IIIII ".. o:-:- r R-0 nu umIW .►v_ R•:IIuI Ih .IU ='11I11 II II 11 imam � _• -8' R•10 MEM FT1•I MEINW�� R. mfflamiZ 11 C9 l� !J�� ■ N 4th 5T- ET R.8 ■ MB Mill :, PI . • E VICINITY$AP FOR UNII@O�N PLAZA HOPPIN• NTRR THE PLEASE INCLUDE PROJECT ,,. • ,.. .. . :;:NUMBER WHEN CALLING`FOR!'PROPER<:FILE;IpENTIFICATIO.N><<`<> s`�' '< I -• ::::1.1.I:;:?[.:';::gi iri'•ii•;ii ii'.:::iiii:#i;: i.iiiiiiii ri ii :ii::::::<:` ?:::::igiti:::: ::$::::}::'}:'.;B:C::::3::: }:ii;:;:;; ;:;:;:fi: rg ii::::::;:::%:1!,•ii:::::::ii ::iiiiiiiiii.:::::i'i ::iiii iii:ii:5 ::::iiiiii:'iii iiiii:::i:::::::iiigiiii ; iiii::giii iiii::iliO i l F:R:•:::•:::•:••:: :••::.•:•::::•:>:::::<i:........w.......:.••••••••••••••;:::i::>:::::iz::ii:a:••••••••••: :•i•••<:::i::i::>::i:: . ENT <:»»::•••••••••:: • ::E.RVIC .::.:;.:'.D::V:II:SII::<:Nia <> > < < > }>«>_ > >i::: _: >i,:g > >'<> >: :: :::><;::>:;: ::::: :::......:::: :: ::: :.....::: :: ......::::::..... ....:::::::::::::::: ENTiiS.ER...ICFS DIVISION........:...__... ........................ ....... .... :.:•,,,,,,,,,,,,.:.:•:•:•:•:•:.:.:•:•:,.:•:•:.:.:.:.:.:•:•:•::::•:•:•:•:.:.:.:•:•:,.:.:.:.,:•:.:•:•:•:.:•:.x.:•:....,:•:.:....:•:•:•:•:,,...::•:•:.:•:•:.:.:•:•:*:::.:.:.:,..,,,,...,.:•::.,:•:•...,*i..i,i*......:,,,i..::..........:.::,...........„::.....*,,.....,:i::.:........,,,i,:,:,..••,,,..T.1„0:ari,:.,iii,:,,,iii,i,,,:,,,Iili,,,in,,,,,,,..„..„iiii.„.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,:,,,,,,,.,„::,,,,,„„:„..:,,,:..,,:,:.: ...........................................:::.:::,.:.::.:::.::.;;:.;:.; :>:: <;:: > :>< > €€<>:€:€PRO :.ERT>Y :0VNER S »i> isi i `><:< ><' '« ::::<:>:>::>>:>>:`'� <�:<PROJ5. T 'NF: A I•ON».. • • •• . :Note:i:If:there IS more;than;;one;legal;;owner p(easc:attachan:;additional notarized::Master Application for each owner::... :.: :.... PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: n�V/1 j'( Un S V Y o f Pku G "'1 p U f /I ADDRESS:3(��0 { ��•S�/ � ',!O/ PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: CITY: �.�In,r-rm� (S` � ZIP: qq0 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): . TELEPHONE NUMBER: z 7i32— �54/Qj EXISTING LAND USE(S): • ° ' . 1S vacanq (Am/b'l!�%Y'C-t om `iAPPLIO N�:T`(:if'`````ther<than':`'wner'<<<<`` '<'` '>`> :::>::>::::>::::;:::>::::><::>::.............. '::::Q.............CAN.:........::::o....................�....:_::o.......::::.:......:::.::....�............ C5 Z4n PROPOSEDD LAND USES:S y� �+�` NAME: Sa h'tc, Ke w"e vhor+_ ce/rt 4' . COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: eLs ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP ;IP. GNATION (if applicable; CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: ®F h • L� cif-o��T �`99� • A'4 TELEPHONE NUMBER: �y PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): 2"0 4'4% ' • y FAA . ._ C •:N TA T:`> E R SO N<:«<: <€i>'>i''> ?>?:>> . . :. :::.. :::::. .::::.:::.:::,:,::.: .: ::.....:............................ ....... ............................ SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): • NAME: J j D j • COMPANY(if applicable):QC31y)10{,6' OCA G8' PROJECT VALUE: • 2_10001©OC) ADDiRESS: 7o1 L a of '- Art, N . ?o IS THE�� SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? CITY: Set:lit:A& tOAZIP: q ..:Q 101 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY y �� SEN�SjIT�IVE AREA? • � - • TELEPHONE NUMBER: •/+ �g5 _ '-r371 Fay. .::PROPERTY:.: Attac �`separate :s ee '1 :;•flee• ssar.: >'>::'<'€:#::s>:`:: :». '>>>:'<:: .;.<;:.:;:;:><: >::<:'>::<:.;;;LEGAE:•:::DESCRIP..TION...OF..: . �........( .. . . ...... . ....... ...... ..... )...:..:.::.:.:::. .........:::: I . i eFEES> `> >'> >< >'' i'al < > is > `> ><> > ` <€ ::>:::>:<::::'::::::;:>:<::::::::::<:>:��:<:»»>::::::»:>:>::>:<:::>::>::; ::::>::>::«:>::»::::»::::::::::>:::.::::<:::;>::>::;:>:<Tll`PEi.0 F;APPLI CATI O1V..&. ............................................... ...................... ............... _ `'>wiII 'determin f << a M1` : : : ' ` >>gfiti: t sees .. :<:::>;:;;;»:>:::>:::::>::><:<::«::::>�:>:<::>::>�::: �.h�e ck�'aIl>a::.:..�lica'�iorrE��>t.....es�::tfatiiia • .. ...... .... .... . . ...... ............. ........... ...... . . ..............::.:.:..::........::::::::::::.. . .. ......... II _ANNEXATION $ • SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ i _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ • _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ I _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT . $ ' — PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ c-�:,•— _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: 1 . _ PRELIMINARY —WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN $ • SHORELINE REVIEWS: ' _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ • CONDITIONAL USE $ i _ VARIANCE $ j 1 • _ EXEMPTION $No Charce _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ �es( REVISION $ _ I - i...............ijj....,.:v::iii?i::tit:j•:;<:ti 4:tit:::?:v ii ::::•!:::{it}::;:j:'<? is ;;:::.:iIDi::;:V:..:;..;;;;:<..'`gOWNERSH1P>`:" '><>':::::< :»>::>:::::<:>:«::<:::::»><:::<::>:::_::::<:<:<:<:><::>:'«:>::<::>::>::::>»>:<:::>: I, (Print Name) rj rh(•`f L-i-iro±,,('-(, declare that I am(please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,_the I • authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. • _ OtsNE I ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public,in and• I (C.O f G o-t(N1 for the State of LOAS))in•,.r) residing at,, (Name of 0 ner/Representative) • ` 4 • he - ,on the II- —day of tOTARy3 1- m,),,,-j1 19.L. . • ' qeu?tt �(Sign.' re •f caner/ ive) , •'�i 01• ,�' �� (SignatuFe of Notary Public) • s:sect a om ' i>'E `t . :.::::.:.>::.:.::.>:.:' :::..:::::<.:::. :>:::.•A:::.R.::::.SHP..:L.::.:;.; U:r:��:`E:kC;.:Ali;:R�:. �.:� �P1;.. SP.::.:RVM.P.....::...: :.:::::..: .:..� :.:::.:.::.:�::.�::CI.t.:..F(Ie:LVumbec... ��" �..a�...::::: ....... ..........:..:::.�:.�::.� �..:::.:.�.:.....: �'.. . .�::.:::::::.::>::.::.�::::::...,::.,.:::.. ::::::::iirici:;:::ii:::::::::.:mi::ii:,:;:;::::::r:.::;:: .. . ...... ..... . .. ...S :.;:.S E:.>:.>: ...... SP.....A......CPA...:.......,.....:..:. :...:.:..:..:::.:�::.::.:.::..:.:::::::.:.:;:.�::.�:.:::.>:.:;; .:::.:..:::.:::::.:.:::::::::::::::::. . . ...:.:$...: .,....:..::.:.....::.:.:.:........T.OTAL..P.,..O S.T�.4G E.. .RO V I DEQ.::::;..$..:.�.a�.�.�:r:: . ::::::;::;:.;:.;:.::;.:;:.:.::.:::;:•:.:<.;:;.;:.> ::::<::>:::>::::<>:<::; ..:::�.::::: ::::.:.:::::::::::::TQ.TaL FEES.,.;..:.,.� :: :...::: :.:::.:..:: '.::.:.:::.:::...::.:..:..,....:. � -........--.,........-...... --__-,-..._ _ow 21 -2NINIIIIIMM=IIMIll__ a 0 CITY OF RENTON elf, • 0,OM . id ft-,,,L,"0•Vs. - .".. it ea Planning/Building/Public Works 61.i;0,,, + •=e 0_.,,.. dlo • CC d Wen-"Oi ... -i r nri q • i Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 a 411IF 2-1"9 T V-1.41:11 ---10 eg-7 ' 4' 4rn I- "-41. ' ON • AU 42 4 CC S • So IA. P 7. : ee R 0 , 1117 ,. ''' i,o. e• : 4 t' Prompters Limited to 3904 NE 4th Street b Renton, WA 98056 _.-- --- - - -0 SUCH ,-----......„....6____I (-,. 1 1 .. • LE,EI r" \- i, , r f•-• \-:, __I --"-- METijkN 10 SENriEt ti`SY O NT REVISED NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Approval (SA), and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the.necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Union Plaza Shopping Center LUA97-034,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street: GENERAL LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Rev.iew- ; , Site Plan Approval ' Building Permit - +_ ...:..._._._.____.....__:._ The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted-anytime priorto Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. Additional Information: The date of Tuesday, May 13, 1997 at 9:00 AM has been tentatively set for a public hearing to reviiew the Site Plan Approval (SA). The hearing before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Coyncil Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. \\\ �R`,jy��'� aloinzer. p nr• •( — R IlliliCu. l'1111 = R 1O —i-- 1III ✓� NE...,,�. RH R-24 L R•10 RI-1 L o _ �.0 Z R•10 Z' 1 I � R_c >, NE 4th STREET P•I GENMALOT.DOC R 10 -- . ... . .. • •___••• • • , a 0 CITY OF RENTON , . -,.,-. 4:;%;;,-.4-,k ye----.--'--1.66-.-..---- ._.._•;,1 . •JI. Planning/Building/Public Works . , .. . Mill Avenue South - Renton,Washington 98055 i 3 ,,,, ..; _• vit OAR 2 l'S T re 5 ; 4 Alig02 . . • , • Ntirreft • Uiet! - ''':' ,‘ . _ •' 71 4076 .. -''"-eg...1 .:, c." : , . Drury Pickering ' 1362 N Bon,niweAV,ie811277A7cres Road .. - Oak Harbor . . Ntte,..1Gn . . PICK38a 9ea7.72ool 1196 1/ OB/24/(47 FORWARD TIME .EXP RTN TO SEND PICKERING PO BOX 1018 -' OAK HAROOR w3a77 -sole - r" .• • . , , . . •. , . . - • - "-. • .:•,:,-. •-t• .. : --=•:',..";,",r 7,'--1.•::-.f46-.17;;::..L -:-. . . i". <":$ IMitiiiii'llati.iitlititiliAttitAlltticitisititi;111-1Aiti - ---- ��C67;1 CITY OF RENTON - - - - _ ., f`_: Planning/Building/Public Works LW u, F -r., -, -- �� ®"""�' �, }. i':d 4t 4 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ® d '°� a 4 CO I.. no2I 1 e.gA I292 , is it P ®!6 U tPYSI.A E p Robert&Carolyn Huffman 12200 SE 18t_ Place Auburn, WA NO SUCH NUMBER, j ! j Ji RETURN TO SENDER 3':�i`.2 e4.swtts-t,,r,, • � 1fF1,;3;:I:li;;Fllfl;FlFlF�;l;IFFFiliFFIFl;l;;!lFFF11;;F::11;! s (cY oo REVISED NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Approval (SA), and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Union Plaza Shopping Center LUA97-034,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of.80,496 s.f.with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. GENERAL LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located.on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. Additional Information: The date of Tuesday, May 13, 1997 at 9:00 AM has been tentatively set fora public hearing to review the Site Plan Approval (SA). The hearing before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. PUCE 1 INN NM IR I1rani Cn11111.= R-1° II II slr I I RL R-10 R-24 I L �o F11-1 R R-10 RI-c _Dims `;,i J \4�GCS NE 4t11.5TREET ca - 1 P.I GENMALOT.DOC. R•10 —{ a 4, CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works LLJ Cf v..0'4 r 0 4, .10 ,AV -d' ...• •••• • . • cc _. ,z,uu Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 .`-' AAR 2 0'9 T V?.,. ; 3 Z 2 9 5 : CI) 1"'• 46CITIJI ow • LIJ co • . 1.6 1 PitaTER 4i • N 0 S 11 C F I#X Al I 1....vi I.) r t D U N l<N OW N Itt 41116 * 'c°,.;../ ; e • * Ni S U I..I I C I 1::.N r A I:)D Ir?I::5 5 rt 1::.r U'5 F.D Ui\![)LL, A 5 S HOW N UNABLE 1 0 l':W II) VA CA N I. U N( I A I :VII:::I) I:: XI.' I ra.t) IOU II:k601 Nil" I A I SkiPtJ 1) ;;;13 PROMPTERS LIMITED PARTNE 3904 NE 4th St Renton,WA 98056 _ rf "",.. S 1 op int cyl, X,I 1 to NV!T.; SENOR Ilaltiltililluill,11#1,litililliillii•lililiAillImlillil ,. - .,____ • ru ATTO NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Approval (SA), and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Union Plaza Shopping Center LUA97-034,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. GENERAL LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental.Review_ • Site Plan Approval Building Permit; The application can be reviewed in the Development-Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during,Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive• additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. Av‘ Y tr., _ �auPL t- o �.. � _gig —I—I IIIKan nu mum I? R-8 R-1III MEIN = I II .= R-I© II II -8 ' R-10 EMIR-24 i_ Illl \��7=�-� 1 C RM C _z cs C5 rli11k •-g I r • NE 4th STREET . . R-8 : - • 1.1% .i: '" VICINITY MAP'FOE UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER GENMALOT.DOC m '700 'I ' • IIIUMIIIIIIIIIII 6 © CITY OF RENTON • '-_ >.,. , --r•. - -- �~---- Planning/Building/ Public Works .�, _„'�-� Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 — 7:4 .1 ,r _"' r....'N.2...,C:,:31 ;keT ......,..,.._, -.........._ ..„....----..,.,,, • Drury Pickering 1362 N Bonnie View Acres Rd Oak Harbor, I-- PICK362 982772014 1196 18 03/22/97 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND PICKERING PO BOX 1018 OAK HARBOR WA `?3 77.-1w1 F1,7 f+,;= .. } ' LE6I Po i l a1V way " _ Aria.1.Iv% ,iiiiiitill �iiitiiiiiithilliiiiililliiiiiii.11iiiiiiriii11i1 • Cr )•ft .rI NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE APPROVAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Approval (SA), and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with tl Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessa Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Union Plaza Shopping Center LUA97-034,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. GENERAL LOCATION: 3904 NE 4th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building_Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Ha Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative si plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish-to'be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receh additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearir date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the proje NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. YY �� Y�:2sa u� rtei�% ;ow.MEI aft"ft Hall 11111 nn 1111m R 8 . R-1111 UMW mmi 11111.-E R•10 11IIII lI m.�67Eu 11121311111M a R-I0 EMI R-24 • RI-I I R.10 WEIN namEcr - - l R1-C \I R1-G \ AIM Z - cs NE 4th STREET R8 - . - C8, •, hE C -- P•I R•10 VICINITY MAP FOR UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER GENMALOT.DOC 0 vIly UNION PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER Project Narrative Size and location of Site: 5.84 Acres 3904 NE 4th Street Renton,Wa Township: 23N Range: 5 E Section: SE 9 Current Use of the Site: Site is vacant and contains a house and garage,both of which will be demolished. Special Site features: The site is currently wooded and contains several large depressions (or gullies)which are man-made and will be filled in with soil that will be cut at the front side of the site in order to make the site usable. Number and Location of Existing Structures and Residential Units which may have views obstructed: This site is currently wooded and removing the existing trees will allow any adjacent residential units to have access to any views which might be created as a result of the tree clearing. The proposed building heights will not block any views. Proposed Use of the Property,Project Name, and Scope of the Proposed Improvements: Retail Shopping Center and Offices The project name will be"Union Plaza". - There will be 4 buildings on the site with a total of 80,496 square feet. The primary building materials will be split face concrete block,glass storefront systems,and pre-finished metal roofing. The height of the tallest portion of the buildings will be 37'-10"above finish grade. 346 Parking Spaces will be provided. These spaces include 328 full size spaces, 11 compact spaces,and 7 handicap Accessible spaces. Site Coverage: 65%of the site will be covered by buildings. Access to the site will be at two entries located on NE 4th Street. RECPilipm MAR 1 1997 oEVELOPry�EhrT Crry LAN OF EEIVTONN ivc, s UNION PLAZA Construction Mitigation Description Proposed Construction Dates: Begin construction in June, 1997 and complete construction in December, 1997. Hours of Operation: 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Proposed Hauling Routes:NE 3rd and NE 4th Streets. Measures to be Implemented to Minimize Construction Impacts: A construction entrance will be paved with rock to eliminate construction vehicles from tracking mud on the existing street as they leave the construction site. The site should be sprayed with water(during the non-rainy months)to help eliminate dust problems. Construction shall occur between 7:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to minimize noise disruptions to the surrounding sites. The contractor shall comply with City of Renton standards pertaining to traffic control while deliveries are being made the site. UNION PLAZA LANCLE4R1N FLAN = 10 IR= 10 /// /.// //'/// / Liu i/The entire site is currently �� /wooded and shall be cleared of//, I I i�/all trees to make the site usable for"// /the Intended use as a shopping center./1 ://////////,. /7/ //j ///// //� %i%////////./////' NE 4th STREET NORM; 440 76 7: ';.:7,6 04 ��T°'fr/ . NT.S.ERV ICES nos lohoggigMEMingnommoniog 111• : ..EN. ... 0. ... MENTAL C PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: • The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this..checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of. your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. - You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply,to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be. significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply:" IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and "affected geographic area," respectively. ECM,ED MAR 1 8 1997 DEVELOPMENT OF RENTONNING Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed;project, if applicable: Union Plaza Shopping Center 2. Name of applicant' Northwest Prompters, Limited Partnership • 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 3010 - 77th Avenue SE Suite 201 • Mercer Island, WA 98040 Phone: 206-232-1388 Contact: Ricky Chang 4. Date checklist prepared: March 17, 1997 _ 5. Agency requesting checklist: Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Begin construction in June, 1997 and complete construction December, 1997. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be'needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton - Site Plan Approval 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. To construct a 80,436 square foot shopping center (with retail and office space) on a 254,698 square foot site. 346 parking spaces will be provided. 2 • . Environmental Checklist 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. . 3904 NE 4th Street Location: Renton, WA Township 23N '. Section SE9 Range 5E 5.84 Acres B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat,.rollin.ebsteep slopes, mountainous, other •r • b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 6-15% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Alderwood - Hydrologi.c Group "C" d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, • describe. No • e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading roposed. Indicate source of fill. The front portion of the site would be graded to level the front of the site. This cut material would be used to fill the man-made gully at the rear of the site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or.use? 'If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 85% • 3 , Environmental Checklist IL h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Run-off water will be detained and will not erode the site. 2. AIR • a. • What typeslof emissions to the air.would result from the proposal (i.e.;dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If .any,•generally describe and give approximate q U antities if known. None b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No - c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,-wetlands)? If yes;describe type and provide;names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Project is located at the crest of two drainage basins. No offsite drainage enters the project. There are no surface water bodies. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. • Does not apply. • 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from" surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Does not apply. • 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Does not apply. 5) • Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No • Environmental Checklist I - 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground Water: 1) - :.Will.ground water be.withdrawn,,or..will water be discharged to•ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Storm water detention systems will be used. 2) -- Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for.example: Domestic sewage;;industrial,: containing .the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size'ofthe system;.°the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of . animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Does not apply. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): • 1) . Describe the.source.of runoff. (including storm•water) ..and.:method.6f.collection -and disposal, if any(include quantities,•if known): Where will this water flow? ..Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Storm water runoff from building roofs and paving will be collected in storm water detention systems. The storm water will infiltrate the soil or be channeled to enter adjacent detention systems. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters?.:If so,generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Below grade water retention system. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs • grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Due to the cut and fill required for this project, all existing plant.material will be removed. The site will be landscaped according to the landscape architects plan. 5 x Environmental Checklist c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed,landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Refer to landscape plan • 5. ANIMALS a. •. •"..Circle any birds and animals which have been observed.on-or.near the site:or.are known to be on or near the site: (see next page) None observed Birds: hawk, heron, eagle,songbirds, other Mammals:`deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass,,salmon,trout, herring,shellfish, other b. . •List any threatened or endangered species known to.be.on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain • No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES . a. What kinds ;of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity used for lighting and heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: All sidewalks in front of each buildinlg are covered and this will prevent heat gain at the storefront windows. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 6 • Environmental Checklist a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None • 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,- equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example:..traffic,-construction;:operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise: 7:00am - 4:00pm -- short term Traffic noise: 8:00am - 9:00pm -- long term- 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Planting at site perimeter 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is vacant, surrounding sites are residential and commercial . b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. • . Vacant house and garage d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? Vacant house and garage will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CS f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? CS Environmental Checklist g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No • i. -Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 50 employees at any given time. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing:.and-projected land uses and plans, if any: Site remains CS zoning and will be compatible with nearby commercial uses. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Does not'apply. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Does not apply. • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Does not lapply. 10. AESTHETICS • a. What is the tallest height of any proposed stnicture(s), not including antennas; what is the princi al exterior t? iicting materials pro os d. 38'-0" high. Building materials t'o be split-faced concrete block, glass storefront systems, and painted metal roofing. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? • None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: • Taller portions of the buildings are at the rear of the site, away from the site entry at NE 4th Street. 8 Environmental Checklist 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light would come from the storefront windows and parking lot lighting. Storefront lighting will be from dusk till 10:00pm. Parking lot lighting to be from dusk till dawn. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No • c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,,if any: Parking lot lighting to be directed away from residential areas. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures .to reduce or control impacts_on-recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. HISTORIC.AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION • a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N one 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Union Avenue, NE 4th Street. Access to the existing• street system will be via the site entry drives to NE 4th Street. 9 • Loy I Environmental Checklist - • b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Unknown at this time. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project.eliminate? 346 spaces provided, no existing spaces would be eliminated. d. •-Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,7orimprovements.to•existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe lindicate whether public or private? No e. Will the project use (or occur .in •the immediate :vicinity.:.of) -water,'=:rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many,vehicular'trips per day would be!generated:by.the completed:project?. If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 4,067 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if.any: None 15. PUBLIC SERVICES • a. Would the project result in an increased need for-public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service,telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, water, sanitary sewer • 10 � I Environmental Checklist b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. C. SIGNATURE _I, the:undersigned, state that to the best.of my knowledge the:•above information is true and . complete. It is.understood that the.lead agency .may .withdraw any declaration of non- significance.that it might.issue in reliance •upon this•checklist.should there be any willful misrepresentation or w ul c of II isclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: -L • ___ Date: 3 ( < 'q 7 • • • • 11 Environmental Checklist I D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Thes :::06: 00t ould> onl`:: t sed iiii4ctions>< nvolvi::.; :.:..�.:::.:::. :::#.:::::.:: ::.:::::::.:: :.:.::::::::: :: ::: :....:..:...: .:: :.:::.:ng:::::::::::::.::on... :::fln::: ollc,es,.:. ►ans.::antl programs:.::Y . .:ria.:n.t:n o.d. . fl.:a ..base sheets,for.pro)ect:aatlons)......... . .:., . . Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. - • .•.:When answering these questions, be aware of the extent.the proposal,.or the types of activities likely.to.result from the.proposal, would affect the•item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate • .. than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly.and in general terms. • 1. • . How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to.water,;emissions to air,.production, . ..storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of.noise? • Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: - i 2. • . How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish,.or marine life? • . •• Proposed measures to protector conserve plants,;animals,-fish,7or marine life are:• 3.. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How Would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? • Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: • 12 Environmental Checklist 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: • 7. . Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any .declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance•upon this checklist should .there .be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Date: REVISED 9/94 13 bayIMO 9j STATE OF WASHINGTON O C T 2 2 1996 CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP RALPH MUNRO SECRETARY OFSTATE The undersigned, for the purpose of forming a limited partnershp under the Washington Limited Partnership Act, RCW 25. 10, hereby adopts the following Certificate of Limited Partnership: ARTICLE I The name of the partnership is Northwest Prompters Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership. ARTICLE II The name and address of the general partner of the partnership, and where all records are kept, is: Northwest Prompters Limited Partnership 3010 77th Avenue SE, Suite 201 Mercer Island, WA 98040 • ARTICLE III The name of the Registered Agent of the partnership for service of process Henry Liebman. The street address of the Registered Agent's office is: COE, NORDWALL & LIEBMAN, LLP Suite 1300 720 Olive Way Seattle, WA 98101 ARTICLE IV .Partnership is of thirty five years duration, or, until October 22, 2031. ARTICLE V The name and mailing address of the General Partner is per the attached Schedule A. This document is hereby executed under penalties of perjury, andis, to the best of my knowledge, true and correct. DATED: October 22 , 1996 gECEMED 4C4. GClhA ing General Partner ikit1 18 1997 . �avEL.)i-MENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON J . CONSENT TO SERVE AS REGISTERED AGENT I, Henry G. Liebman of Coe, Nordwall, Liebman & Friend, hereby consent to serve as Registered Agent, in the State of Washington for NORTHWEST PROMPTERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Washington limited partnership (the "Partnership") . I understand that as agent for the Partnership, it will be my responsibility to receive service of process in the name of the Partnership; to forward all mail to the Partnership; and to immediately notify the office of the Secretary of State in the event of my resignation, or o any changes in the registered office address of the Partnership, for which I am agent. DATED this 22nd day of October, 1996. AGENT: Henry G. Liebman COE, NORDWALL & LIEBMAN, LLP Suite 1300 720 Olive Way Seattle, WA 98101 TELEPHONE: (206) 624-5622 .41 SCHEDULE A GENERAL PARTNERS Anthony Show-Tsu Lin Toptex Network Ltd. 12900 SE 44th Court 3010 77th Avenue SE, Suite 201 Bellevue, WA 98006 Mercer Island, WA 98040 Ricky C.Y. Chang Benjamin K.C. Lee Managing General Partner 3455 North Blaine Street 15202 NE 167th Place Seattle, WA 98199 Woodinville, WA 98072 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 03/18/97 14 :32 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9701647 Amount : 2, 512 . 16 03/18/97 14 :31 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #10049 NORTHWEST Init : LN Project # : LUA97-034 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 092305-9110 Site Address : 3904 NE 4TH ST Total Fees : 2, 512 . 16 This Payment 2, 512 . 16 Total ALL Pmts : 2, 512 . 16 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81. 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 2, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 12 . 16 „ . ' • ----,, C ) • , . :z.,,%'•.,.•••.:•7. -:°-,-.''':,...::::,..,°,•''' 1"..'n.',”, :,..i.-=••• " -1,,•"•,',,,.•,"-•.'.' '--;„',,,'•.,'' ', ,,',,•!,°',:.„-',..,°f:-:,•••.'. :If:,,,r,,,,;;*!,' i"-•,,,,•!..'",;.;:- . . ':`, •' "",'","- -'-'-•.:,...''', '. •' :.,-•• ,•• c'•, „-",, •• •„ •,./, •',', ..,,,' .,,,'"•-' ;:•&:"*. , .-,,,,,_,,,.'4':;;4•:,,,','•:•... :-•'!-Y..' .?. : -,• '''. ,,,i,,It.,.4.Y,,Y,Cf.„,;;;...',, ,.:, .:4•-•:.!,,,,44„,*:,,,..'4,4,,4.';',,,,,,i,,*.:-.:,-4 -1,:,,-,,I,4 '1,.:,4.... -,‘,? '-ts,',?,1,k,e9-".-'4,-;..t.,4ReITEXil'pi ,),4'-'," 4,-'4...;,?;$;.'''''.,,- .fri;.'-'-'°!. .;',-.1'...c.-s,•,,4. : ,,, HNICAL-7.-4.'4,-4, %,,',.-,-,',,i',,-,A,,,:•INFORMATION-;,-, REPORT 1 ,;:i PRELINI1NARYTEC ; t' '-i, • '<h•,-;c`,:t''—„.,-.-% "?.", •',,,`„ .V.F-.<'.•,: , . ---:, ,. ..= , ;„ '• ',,,-;- ,'., :,...:-„,. •,.-• -;- -2,:•,',.,,,;*: : .--'-,;:z ' '"..1,1 .`",:.-'. ''',.';•:',:, ,'• '•'‘r,,,,jr;:•:',',:-,;,•;),.,.7..:: ...,,,,' •',,,f ,"°•.,:, .` ,-,-T,-,-,,, ',..,, ,,•e; ',,,,, ,,t., -.. •'::::',5. :%:,.,i.,...,,.1,2,,,; •:. ,,.,„,,, ••:... -.... :',..' •FOR ,, i„:„.,-:,:,' yk c4.:! ..,,..,"4, 1,1,7•14.,.,';',.-/-*Aii., ": ',IP'', ...','?-:' '1.,:„:4?:',',.„:,.,-%),4'.'-1.';',!.:';' ::-;:'': ;.1:,,'''';%)",,...1,•;.°:°.';.T. 4;;J°::0,'r.:-:,-'1'' ''';',':,:dep,P1:&';',::.: 1. :..,;-, '':!:.1'1,.:•,•,:;• :i.,:,'",t,'";•,','.--''',;-.••%,itl',:i,•,44,,,,,,;'.;;.,...:;-',,",,:,''2: 5,, • ",i.',,,,,,,"'01,,,),,',,:::,',•;;;:4' e,,i,,,X••:,..•44.1#, iii :.•T',••-1 ,,,, ‘0:5",'' ''?-,./4` ,.',/1:•-- , f4 .1,4,4%,;-;4,': ,--d::::,,:'' UNION'' --,---6i...~. -,,,. ','41,41-,':',.•-.1,,, At'A, ,i,,,,,,:hifi:j' =1,:,:ik!,1,,,fr'',':,'''''•-' :,JrAZ ,,„,,,,- :,...,.. yl,„.„4„,,,,,,..„.r,“,;. ,,,,.„• ,41: , ,,,,,,,,, , , ,.. ,,,x,..:J,,‘.,k;,T,;;;i., ., ,N.40:,01:a4„.,,F,,•fivi•..4,,1.,..' - -;Te`.°"' ' !,!' ' . - " '"`- •, ) '..- ,' '5-''',. ,,' ,..,',,' •-• '4P4,i,:,,..i.'",,-,4,,-,,:,,,-, -,s;,4,-,...- --, -.,,,,, • -;.::'‘ii--,'4,, 4 ''',';4'' p/' ' 4°t' -,°';',.;';',/':,': rv,-,.---.4-4,,,,'i-1,4*,...*:.,-o. .,.,..i,4,-,,,-.,,,, 4.;,,,44-,, •=8,,,,--", t, •, t-f*-•. /., if •,, gr- • '1,i'of-r- .0. , •,,,„',t ,•,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,',..,,,,-,,,.,..--:- ;:.,?. .?-„,4).,1, 4;„4,w4e,,,,,i,',,,s,•!„,,.4,,l',...-:,:.-4,4w -,,,,,4-- _,_„,ri.,,,,,,;=4,,,,i.:14,1„,4„ ttENTON4YvvASHINGTON514. ilyr,4044-:•---,--v---'- .,,, .,-•-•., -„,f. ••.1,,,.„:,.,,,,,..4,,,,,„..,,,,, .. .. „ f.:,,,.„, 7 ' ,, ,,',.: , ,, , ,..",.;4, '4„,,,-„yk:1',41'.4 ya,t,‘;`,,:,,,r.'44.1',4 ,i,,, .,,,„,..t...::::•.,s,',.. :::;,:„ .• ,,, „f.,,; ' ,'' :,; ,,., ,.,,,,.:...„,, ,:,„4,, ,,, 4,,, ....,, ,, ,,A,,+ :.K.A.:,,t;1-, 4 43 ;,';•,,;;4-',4?',4'':',,,,,,;;„,',,1**"441":4;309,', ',.; '4, ',4,,,44,4°'"tZ,1,4".4<;','„,:,,.,,':„4/4fr;., ,1`13'4,,:;':;,!'14V,.'',,,4,:';41,,V4t4.,,i4klee:?.;'",4 44;'''''f;,431., ,,.`,'3,V,,V:'',1,-,e''''1'''''''; .'l';;!:('`'':'''!'el'!.;:',;';,,',.;'1'..;„''', ,, ,',,..'„'' -3,,,`''',,,,:°!!, '',',..':,";';'''.'''.1.',,,, ::::::',.`015,,t,Ast;:::.i.'j'1.•,,,::::'...Y.;;;“':',:':,,.: . • _ . . . .. , i':':-,',...'.., ..„,i,:i:-.;.•‘..,)..)'i;'-'', L.i. r..I.--i ir.- ',1,. ts,i...4,- ---- - • ,,,,J• .. , ' 3 ARA/ • •,c,,-c • si.,, / 4, •o* OUR JOB NO. 6042 i,„ ' .. 411,ti• i ''‘• at i.iiii- . 0 , MARCH 11 , 1997 r 9 ', 4i • ., ,,..., . 0 20011 _to .4%4' 4e stec. . 6'/ONALe`"4 p.....,-.:1:::s 2/5/r 8 • Prepared By: • BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. • - • 1821 5 72ND AVENUE SOUTH .,•.. . ECI \117 • KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 (206) 251 -6222 i‘;AR : 1997 . • DEVELOPMENT PLAN; Oily OF . _. , cimioN, ,,-- .. Colilit,4) _>. - 1. • i CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES -,13ENG10 • TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 2.0 PRELIMINARY CONDITION SUMMARY 3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 4.0 RETENTION/DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM DESIGN AND ANALYSIS 6.0 SPECIAL REPORT AND STUDY 7.0 BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLAN AREAS 8.0 OTHER PERMITS 9.0 EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN 10.0 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS 11.0 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION MANUAL APPENDIX A Crown Pointe Apartments Storm Drainage Calculations I. PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW/EXISTING CONDITIONS The project is located approximately 230 feet west of the intersection of Union Avenue and N.E.4th Street, Renton,Washington. The site is divided into three parcels totaling 5.84 acres (see Exhibit "A"). Parcels "A" and`B" are currently undeveloped and are covered by cedar trees and light to heavy grasses. There is also an existing dirt road that had been utilized as an access drive to the site. Parcel"C"has two existing buildings on it that are not shown on Exhibit"A," as the surveyors were not allowed onto the property by the owner since the sale agreement had not been signed at the time of the field survey. One of the buildings is a house and the other an automotive service center. Both buildings will be demolished before construction begins. Foliage on the property is similar to the rest of the site with the exception of some lawn area. Soils borings on Parcel "C" indicate ground contamination up to 4 feet in depth. These soils have apparently been contaminated by existing petroleum tanks, as well as a failed septic system. Design for this area is assuming that these soils will be disposed of off site. The residential property to the north of the property encroaches onto Parcel `B"with a dog kennel and a concrete patio,and overhangs the property line with its carport. The developer is currently working with this owner to relocate the kennel and break up the patio. The carport only slightly overhangs the property line and will not need to be relocated. 6042.002[TN/es/kn] • Im I = v, `^V , `• 1�'_j4 I . _ •_ MI5 tI NZ I_• _t v S I E ` r . '_�,..1: i . Wan + ;1 NI•��E 4 .. !' � A.3INItl21 5$ .a • . ]�� co i „ .,. n e —� 1!' . 1,1 N t,,,,, .____-_.1,„,i; ,, ® 1 ter' y�(}1tl1 �+ aw � .l _ �j ; NI g- . . �_ 3otmJAtn a .., nJ as TA(Op �• - \ 'L g, MO cm Q N s• yy. ,ig802.ii.,. L N ,,, ,_\\ r ©��_.t I OGAN AV� 1 a f* a MI di IIITI W r��r7��T�1r9.� _ AV "' S • ' . YI tIA6 Ar '�\ yr. :: tea\\�21311 I- ©� AY N Sa, y -S�s S Ho- ©� t�1L � "��,L`�Y�.� ~rI `�— \ Y.B :1t LS Fl CEDARA , � •'-1�• —�' 8 tea' _ ' �� \��' � r+�L�1 PARK AV N '71I' 1135TH AY I' S N v� 5 GPANTWW1' J00 `pi\ •� •s a �:d�I �,u z Nii'S / 1_ I 1-- ' ��M IH 1 _10' _ AV 6600 N E I ,� ®� ` \ ,� , .o� 3 §�_ .Np1�NI • 7 --- N 5 �I F v 1800 I'^ I® N N „ <\ �l9 `� ., 1 ,. 4 Jons � 2 �� r N4 1"1. f s N t o FRWY Ii9ILal AV N r l� SE wE A IS - 4oa Iv 1 11117 -Man r- nti ..�,r�--------- .�,e� ~ I: =� 780 HIGN AV E '-1 Af - ro9 ]09THAV SET 'C O �, 11' : \ - z I i K Lilt =seal' o�yQ` :n R a c,� �`�AllikltsQ�. y ��` ®,){1O'NE�S ;1 r AY =�xE I 1 IIm _Liana. sm Z4 Y u�"oa ' � a A~ :�+A, ,�( 'T' � ,A _,= s KAV NE 8'rff .� n sL� Il1TH AV SE I - ; •i �' /I�Lwr7� �.i—;::a��, u,m>a T • • w st ge m..._._16400_$ , .,,� ' ' / - .,,.�E \r::.'BROH `4 / $ 4 M, ' 1 terra& 1 I a s • I400 to m. AC rx r ai e m ^1 50N �9-• H I AY SE IUrlI,A�v SC I ny 4,o- W.r iN[Rs[ o q (r 4r �r 'pf s� i ti mot; ''<rm[G� r/ ABERDEEN R• Ay JI r3 1 t4M Ar.� _= 114TH AV SE I A a. . °b 4. p y t' i ,F,'\• Pi .yf -`trSD, t. I 8...� BUIxE - tu°°�• N1 6THiE�I 1AV Ar ye 8 y , k t* 11: �' ' 1� I i r� L h ;n L w 1 Ar Ar N .AMAS AY lif N� `tOR `Ay g=I 16800 •V ',Qr 4 ' / 4 firi "FRI .'O r 8 Av 8-` • AY•• _NE 1. a evil® ♦ \ I rND �£`VA YTON AY NE DAYTON Jr "T ft q ! i i.. '� ;k sf ' •$ itop,.. 1 I/�� EDMONDS A MIX.3 v+ao fi ? 8 4'�` �4�� / N �'SNI�! t MD , Ci v�Rt7I1� * NE ~e n, w•'w ~1 9M Ar�st v A,A a . rv. �,yV/r +'11 o ..DiaMI �ili >t 12,7 r •r 120THI AV " '' i5e '•[NGTOH-_ lir ,Cy :121 iAr a Ar Ar,,,. r;r a�.. ®aay' _�+ '>. ...�le Ar }, , .. NNE ` tNDR !t ® �,9• ,a,-7 II —� sr 4.1.f., "�mm� (: t :r— •N '` t \, 16600 T" ,ti , ; /. � L. F •. W., CYNx.000�� ' • ." -; °a f a.l.. MIN p 5[ 'T E ss r' / 01 "1%1 0 j' ♦ ,a �r t0 - •' ! ;-, O �� AV NE NDN t� „n ^s.,s r 1774 75IC k' r4��S ' 6lrs•�'� O I'�yY \ •y+ ROE �® -r >c �, _ + ,ml Ar _ to k `S a nnesi'' Si. / D>_. r'e' 1 1Mia W®w. A�■ilneir_ie M3N•sr_ - �. I= ,tTTll k pI . _ p �)�11�y� AYi kt- C. r'^-_ �� ._it-. tt SC ,y I 37n3\ i Tk 4r R Q• _• I F !'E <1741Y��®�m 16 K; } IfC SE x• .M :I' '. to /, ®m sE 6600 :e,x a1 100 ,1.. sr,�L _ :-I / a / �' ° i �3 �' Y�� .1 A<t t 8 a —- 81 n-" -l ' it :nr...v n ,� �� A. 1 . Ss A WEEK AYE N . 11110 o• PI.a A Ar 2 �� K�AY 'LLB N o� ■-: 4, sail A m -4 4 r,j5,M �ocm,k � — ri. I 4�I 4� IY a " ,191E F J , H i.,is TX AY N t, Ar 14, 6 W SS .a AV E I y u sr n�.It y s>R S YV , �! ` . Oe^�� vctra Ar Ne a///��,��pppgggM A 1 yL89I]S 0099t 1Sz:a DI s< se N ©�! r - <L ON AV AV '� SE I\ ..`AV NNIINA TAtout ; �I y� ' ~!]]AD n,e ants .a - .� �11!;i7Y/ I I� �1 UNION - . N E UNIDH'^ ■��'a - - i 1 AV — I T 32Jp A ,.� nDI SC m ,+'b,ae. �� - f-- � a��r. . � rill ,�a� .` rAvaR 109W L I ,I,i -:---- ? '�-_a "wilt, rrR _ r aT ✓ 'A910N CT NEl + `� NHITMAN,N� Q• k71 I 1 t 75M r a :s'4'r I I 1 '�' I mace AV t $Nam, '° VAs um R _ MEN r i PI SF b ,_h 4,� - `/>),` \ I L ' s OT NE j' V• Ar CT ME NN1TW •�. 1 g ,n°w -CZ) •Q 1 I � 1361H Ay SE .� +s •T. AroxartS • Ar •A AI f' y y-1 =r , 'e' .. (MEMO Y •1 r "t .,.0 NS u roil N .r ,u� {„, tt 1 A4 /seE, 4 N'^ �K,' - _ f: :AL. ,,' .s'� •- rt '3 ,0. IIrN" T IJ87H IA1 7TH,�`�_- Ay__NE. \� x , .lalTrl E nemr _ a1 °tN �tk m �. IsE t L V AE15E :TH G s aysE <o I ` �a.v sr 'Sc - ,sue - N H— !_ S• . _ •TN n SE Us 14j9,w'm - fOUVALLAV I ?\tir4. C' 14 b 7`C ac Sr IV u1 4 a 1 K i ':F a sr= c J� 138TH _ AV IS: am s 1,ft E A Si r 140r 2 r� 'b.r ,. uln T'�. 5 x 4 -- --—:7'1 >GIdOM ' L4� .::: aA. f.v�u _ q �� r SC_ 8© 31kM �.gTLA I goluri�r8� lF. := - *nyEEE€€€ a sc I 1 w SEA ..I "i4F4 6 u F �� t wa "�144TH • U7R0 ND AV SEy -- AV _ NE : w • LN9'NAr s[ a4 + �: I\ & 144T .. AV SE C® 144TH Ay E m 2 gl .), _ ` CC44co.ArM kgyi,x.. k l4:4r s, ..0$ , a� usrxg 11 �l4 tx AV i 3 I750O 1 N 4 4 • ,'„ , 1uM •`� 4 • $' 146n , 116TH Al SE tl5 -_. CII C 4,'AY 5 ?'-14/M Ar SC r, 16500�,, • )' X' 10 u >t 46TN 146TH AT SE - - :nn ,.- >C ++�� I ,___ 1- 146M Ar SE MN AV .. " .T�o4r04-k .; --fr.. - ION pi.SST I., N K a'`�. .ifs, �Ig I I4� Page 1 of 2 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT ENGINEER AND DESCRIPTION Project Owner Olympic Associates Co. Project Name Union Plaza Address 701 Dexter Avenue North, Seattle, WA Location Phone (206) 285-4300 Township 23 N Project Engineer Robert J. Armstrong Range 5 E Company Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Section SE 9 Address Phone Kent. WA (206) 251-6222 Project Size 5.84 AC Upstream Drainage Basin Size 0 AC PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION PART 4 OTHER PERMITS ❑ Subdivision 0 DOF/GHPA 0 Shoreline Management ❑ Short Subdivision 0 COE 404 0 Rockery ❑ Grading 0 DOE Dam Safety 0 Structural Vaults ■ Commercial 0 FEMA Floodplain 0 Other ❑ Other 0 COE Wetlands 0 HPA PART 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN • Community New Castle Drainage Basin Cedar River PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS ❑ River 0 Floodplain ❑ Stream _ 0 Wetlands ❑ Critical Stream Reach 0 Seeps/Springs • Depressions/Swales ■ High Groundwater Table ❑ Lake 0 Groundwater Recharge Cl Steep Slopes 0 Other ❑ Lakeside/Erosion Hazard PART 7 SOILS Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities Alderwood 6 to 15 percent ❑ Additional Sheets Attached 6042.004 [BAH/kn] Page 2 of 2 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT ITIR) WORKSHEET PART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT ■ Ch. 4-Downstream Analysis Failing City infiltration system 0 0 0 ❑ Additional Sheets Attached PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION ❑ Sedimentation Facilities 0 Stabilize Exposed Surface ■ Stabilized Construction Entrance 0 Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities ■ Perimeter Runoff Control 0 Clean and Remove All Site and Debris ❑ Clearing and Grading Restrictions 0 Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities ❑ Cover Practices 0 Flag Limits of NGPES • Construction Sequence 0 Other ❑ Other PART 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM ❑ Grass Lined Channel ■ Tank 0 Infiltration Method of Analysis • Pipe System 0 Vault 0 Depression SBUH ❑ Open Channel 0 Energy Dissipater 0 Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation ❑ Dry Pond 0 Wetland 0 Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage ❑ Wet Pond 0 Stream 0 Regional Detention Brief Description of System Operation Facility Related Site Limitations 0 Additional Sheets Attached Reference Facility Limitation PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PART 12 EASEMENTS/TRACTS • (May require special structural review) ❑ Cast in Place Vault 0 Drainage Easement • Retaining Wall 0 Access Easement ■ Rockery > 4' High ❑ Native Growth Protection Easement ❑ Structural on Steep Slope 0 Tract ❑ Other 0 Other PART 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. Signed/Date 6042.004 [BAH/kn] II. PRELIMINARY CONDITION SUMMARY III. OFF SITE ANALYSIS 3.0 UPSTREAM/DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS Please reference Exhibit"C" in this section. The project is located at the crest of two drainage basins. No off-site drainage enters the project. The downstream conveyance system is a major concern for the project. The ultimate discharge for this project and the surrounding areas is an infiltration system located near the Merlino gravel pit. This system has been failing during the short, intense storms. The city of Renton is concerned that flows from this project will only worsen the problem. However, utilizing the three detention systems that discharge to three different locations, as well as continuing to discharge through the Crown Pointe detention system, the overall time of concentration for the flows to the infiltration system will be lengthened and should not affect the peak flows. 6042.002[TN/es/kn] -- -1-- ---------- 1 : IN ' 14. , , I . 1 WiliM11111115 ..t• ______ 3.,_,_ 47 I 9 11-1 S- Ila I DE.423:. IIII .r -42--------enum sar4-5 - * 011111 111 Mit‘ . I I I-- al I 114. i • ! r"7 ! ----- lai5- 13.8,-. ST li El / an-. • 3 I _ — I iii 4-• dom 1 NM 11E5-1 • ---- III : ilety A itiall cn i 117.;5":"64 •13'CS- 1=13'C5 1 $ IIIIM '---- L. NM ----- 13.C5-6 .. II L._. .. 13.E5-t • is k m it i--1 ni row : m - C h ll FM ..c3_,1 • < —b. 4„10, ,‘..... , . _- . I. IN _ co mum mai 170 di lml 11E5- • 1=1 • 13.C5-4., Nsailimagai s L, IR p ROW FA rn iii — vis, Li ., IN ipsim .... •.3.._3 .._ ,, 11E5-4 . IIP ‘1111\ SW1 ''>- I • ----IL MEM IMO 111t5-1 Cd .00000,711:7"..—Es 5 • 13.E5-7 MA (X 13.85-2 ; •CC IS• L__ ___, IV ath = NE ta 0 00 • 13.E5.4 NE 7T _, T 0, IN. otif al am,„ , ac6-L 23-56-2 • Mill 1111.21.. i • 111, . 13E6-6 La MINIM Li OA en irommw-r—i ow , I ,La itt ar lolliiiiim - g•ilar ....„,..asia_ mcc6:-. 11111M iiimi 111110 - E._, 0 Iiii. • ... 13.06-3 • 13E6-7 , ,, • • I IIIII "Me!" :L17 Ift4 AVM ikvIlt Int, 41 13.1.6-3• . IIMIIMPlik. . A.:1111 • aft 111111 I 4* . \ 411 113 eira 13 6- ari. 011E6-4 r..E6_9. , 4P - 1 m . aill 1 I**3 S tra ii. I 111. 41, lalli L-j I 1111111 134 • , MIMI Mart lall WAIN la11.1 Ma .i 4tolPiNdim 134:6- # 4.41,1° LZ' mall MINI • -10 jac"-u MIMI 13.E71 13r7-te • • PL MIS Etela Aidl 11E7 • alkikillall "Eli La IIIIIIIII ; g 1 114 III 101111111 9 'I" ,VS *4,1 so _ Am ..... c2 mum IA 9 • . •i-V7 .-1 .7-3 . I •[11 1111 III1Mt Ear4 NEW MIX 13.G7-4 ill /-1.1E71 rips pm iiirip 1 1167-2 . 1 • 1111111111 Tl 07172 ;•Irl;‹ • .Ull ' 7-2. •,,h•13.67-11 • I 1 a(___ 44 iZi Ng 4 ION .N1r11 ii613.E7 14 • 13,7_4 fist.A.mcw. i13: $ . • II III 4110 • 11E7-7 134-7-12 13./7-12 '11/7-15 1357-13' ••117-16 • • . E 533 RI wir• • _ ii I • 11/7-5 5'''... "-'• 13E. 11/7-14 . ,„,_. • 1317-6 • 13.03-3 I Mg 1117-7 -----1 3 . In M IR Vkt 13E7-6 • V-5 - • -9 MIN 1 -ALM n a viik_Ae Itilk ..._. , _re acT7-7----73—•—.0„...: taGe-e-9 a— IL •11E8-1 s.-,--------, I . rq Ellgite. et, #N4 . t i SCALE WO 3 g. j& - Nr . . .... imill 4#4, 13,88-1 izEc 11 . •13.113 8 1 • • • 1444.L._4,68,4 . 0.68_3 • p1 Now II - 13.re-t 1 ' k*grran MI" 7j IMO 1-13,88-5 ...___________.- 111.8-2• i ._i tAat • L.". 1111 1111481.' . •13/8-9 13,113(-2 ---- 4Ellimmillis . . morn , • 4TH 13.E9-3 13Y9-6 • • 1319-7• lar tzre>D4 i k 1349- • 1189-.4 8-3 AM.= '' ' 1V9- 1aG9-4:''.".n..m......m....A..... ---3 EXHIBIT C • • . 2 1119-1 4 - • : -• : SEE SHEET 18 SHEET 13 ( Revised SEPTEMBER 15, 1993' ) - - • ...i. IV. RETENTION/DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 4.0 DETENTION SYSTEM ANALYSIS Please reference the soils report which has been included as Appendix "A" of this report. Soils testing has been performed on the site to investigate the possibility of infiltration. Soils logs indicate that the top 4 to 5 feet of soils are suitable for infiltration. However, soils greater than 5 feet in depth are far more dense and are unsuitable for infiltration. Groundwater was also encountered at depths as shallow as 7.5 feet. These conditions will make infiltration unlikely. Please reference Exhibits "A" and "B" included in this section. Drainage for the site is broken into four existing basins. These basins have been greatly affected by development around the site. The site will utilize underground pipe detention systems that are sized for the standard 2/10/100-year design required by the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Water quality for the project will be provided by dead storage and sediment storage in the bottom of the detention pipes. Basin"A" is a closed depression that was formed when the apartment complex to the west of the project, Crown Pointe Apartments, was constructed. This depression shows no signs of standing water as the existing soils will infiltrate surface water to a depth of 3 to 4-feet before hitting the denser materials that cause the water table. A storm drainage stub for this basin was provided by the Crown Pointe Apartments. This basin was addressed in the drainage report for Crown Pointe during design as upstream drainage, but was not addressed in the calculations. This report has been included as Appendix "B." An analysis will be completed to evaluate the effects this flow will have on the existing detention system. Basin "B" is 0.62 acres in size and was addressed as an upstream drainage basin in the Crown Pointe drainage report. A storm drainage stub has also been provided for this basin by Crown Pointe. This drainage currently enters the detention system for Crown Pointe. Flow will be restricted to the existing runoff rates and will not affect this detention system. Basin"C" is a small basin that discharges onto N.E.4th Street. Flow for this area will be released into this system through a new catch basin installed over the existing tightline. Flow will be restricted to the existing runoff rates and will not affect the existing conveyance system or the downstream infiltration system. Basin"D" is a closed depression that will ultimately be detained through the other three detention systems. 6042.002[TN/es/kn] BRASS DISK. STANDARD P FENCE / /m 4�: , • ' 6b / PORT ,my MARKING) ON A 6" CONCI, • \ /j, j / i %�l �o`' e ,m"j Amy' ' BELL MONUMENT AT PROP- �i'i%' /p �� ! -y'm �' .I CORNER (1/15/97) • FND 1/2" REBAR & CAP \ / /�/ �' 89 ' �/ • y' , 1 MARKED'C&c LS 1807r ' �'� % .i /l.�',f S89'01 4"E 330.r�4' 4, ,094, ° ' 1 m' 0.2' S. x•0.4' W. OF . ho' PROPERTY CORNER _/ l / /!/� �� 280e� fl r. 5:m 50.q (1/10/97) M1 �� / c -- FENCED my'yM1= --�•--�__�� KENNEL , '' :! N \\J ) I I I ~ 4. � yo^� ,m6° � 'o _`�—�SEE DETAI AT RIGHT� �� 'my I EXISTING \ - \ BUILDING I \�\ \�•�� QQL q. . „,, .:tF «:3x,,ry":;E:3s i;•":',1,:.„ 1 O >-, / v°. i / / �� X1-11'N,cHENE >:".`&:.:>; s"3g.i,..ii„4 1 k , —-- 5 ...... ----1 , . 3:.::ri':.s:`s>';;.t..<s:;:r �7RASH \ - �� i /^�/ /�� ,( '' ,,v.A ENCLOSURE )1 �b` �/ / / ' !/. \ �\\ moo. `¢y',^�.N.A i. , / / / --� //// ,6+.r \�i.',t R X ,ram .ci Atom ' 1^mg" /j g80 i' / %�,,/j �./ />'//� 89'06' r,F 1nl1T1`{+` . p'p£ ' M1m //'//�% s- .. !� �j/ " ` \ , i (-MI/ s£.. � �i�jiv________ //,. j '��4pp i //� Ili' FND PUNCH MARK ON A 3" / wW V. E�__� j ! / ��! M' BRASS DISK (STANDARD P : m / W -�_! ///j'� /,j 1p�" I MARKING) ON A 6" CONC ' I WATER /� �� A BELLMONUMEM0.1' f �'I:g i �� BLOWOFF � i-� � � � /! � cm 0.0' E. OFCORNERr9/97) I1 �y. /i �' ) IIli /-/ lam— I ,` I // ; \ \ kI I !!i i Aj.,\ BUILDING I \ �' •�� I, h I y ,.... ...S I II F°y, ? / �/\ \ r\ I % ( / " \/( \\ ) ' ''''s, ,\ alp 5 o• r Amy BLANKET TELEPHON o • -�� / I /EASEMENT PER REG. ro P. --'�' 1 I /N0. 3631034 / �,mM1 ^tn I A' '� y ,m W I{ �FN�1/Yk�'EBAR�& CA ! . r m ,...---1% I "" •...,•'":,r.[`'i l°pp MARK D C& LS 1807 , ( �� - d 329. N. x .1' OF \ �- M I /o SW F7ROPER COR ER /. y �_ ��a /o' •;.`M1, (1/1 /97) I }' yti UY \ ^` ,M1 R`s)' .,1,7,« // ! /N '\ / EXISTING I I • IRE ,a1 �-� 9 BUILDING II I / _ oy'i . <"''':1`':> • 11 i: ' y e " POWER i,/ / - N 1 as 1 I I ,...7 7r / POLE / ! o I BLANKET TELEPHONE cN 3JI� / / / O m EASEMENT PER REC. r j 1 II " $__ o Wo NU. 3575610 YL d • Il,e / / , i e err:>t::.>�:;:.i:: 'IY I^f �''' 1 ,f ,S`' j �a s 1:g: •::'rs::r::s / l ] / / / 20 I 2 W ;r z M1/ f i 20' INGRESS EGRESS F�SEMENT - I3 (( + I / FOR THE BENEFIT gb'f'ARCEL B OVERHANG'OF I I ti a X M1 / / .1YM1 .,.----� CARPORT o .0 � ..1eM1 p \\ oo /./ i i \ -- "�\ 1 \ 7\\ g ,, / / I OWNER REFUSED .r.:....:. 7 I N )` '1./9.i I ACCESS TO CREWS I `"<''':.':: CK .ALLX"M —K�1 I I 1e':4,.:;;:., CB—H as;..;a::::: `o r N. 'Ni1 ! 1` ",my % I I 0 I FOR THIS AREA iEi , a<:::., \\\JJ e 4, IIO / \ /1 /1 I i - -e--- .� ,rye •, :7.,./: X: m SE END ` . CB-G my, NOT FOUND / / y. 1 / m �4P/ / CO 4,7 / ,e ",-` / 1 i! i • / / POWER I I __ �yy imp /�m6 j' ' r , POOR rROAD AND UTILITIES ' / a / 1 / l EASEMENT PER REC. . 'r / m P °e i I +�• NO. 403020586 i. , M ) � 1 / .(�, _ p r(oe) _._](Wr1_i Kam) :i.:-__.:,.\—,..&!02X:.: .••WATER , / 0 / r % ROAD AND UTILITIES1/2" REBAR & CAP METE POWER ! o EASEMENT PER REC. '``. ``.CHAIN LINK y „ ;ED"C&C LS 1807r �OLE ( pe " N0, 6403020589 �ePOWERFENCE $CN x 01' E OF 111111 i /CB-1 y /�oS�d dam_ 71 I —x ii iv!."` ia '•- `oS N� -- - n:',,,... / ) ziN '►> — 210 6' I "• . �,z:.i:,. 0 97 �1� ��i s,:` _—_ — _ ` T ��'.� "L'' ) N8_'06'06"W„ 150,04',,.e __ 1 ',,,: q :; `:;.:r,..;;:r.,>.:.':;:rt.:?NAt.......r.._..1:�;:;;';�.`; ;»:..:, ref:-' • -- -- --- : r :. .. .o :.. .:.. TER>:...;...:v......:;r..'t:,...:...::.. oi .<>,. . ,-:.... ..... �'�......._. .. ... ................,......:,. . . ., ... . . • ;^C8'r'E';? :i-:.,.,«'m,T' �.i'?'�?^:i>"��?<sjVATEB':.'.,..... :f':s};'i . ...::..:..:.,... dy?" ¢ ::' : �'�• . :;i:' :;.>''<r;:;a'$.., l. .... ............ ...... ...... ... ..... :... ....:. ..... . ... ............:....s>... �g {� r:.r:.::.::::..:.:is:'Yas>r'r>i's�i:::isi:>!:�i»r�::;1:>:::>::5.;::rat<>. ;. a�.:.. ......:::.. p e. ' 'e :.,•..;: :..;....... to•::,,..r»:o;;:,:;;�: � „".. ..: H ,:-- .... ..t............"............ >.....>.»ter, .,. x.. ....:».:. . r,:.... . ,.»::,::::.:...:..:»:;.o:.,,;...�a,,..:: .. .,, . .... .... ...:. ....V......... .» ... .. ..II o.. ...4,. ..at ..ax a. : t .»s,s o ..r % ::. ,.:> .:eta :,' .,<:<::;.`,�'�:..,,..: •r pp) � r(arq r(oM "MGx) Kp) Grq K Kav) P(�). ' . !W>CTER OVA II, - Q WATER G •"• II CB-B LVE CB_A 11 POWER 1 VALVE � POWER HYDRANT J/ POLE GUY POLE Wiac SSMH-B HYDRANT , ,,,� • M Cn CP / 0 ni rn • m :I: n r — • r N . 0 - rn .... 4141. Ow- ci .-v KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL ' FIGURE 3.5.1C 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS 7.---- - .7: Lirmigi• -.--- Ay ; .. ow ak ,,..7,-, r ,,,, , A..._ . \:, - .! ...r.ft, , 8. : i RD iw, Przar•As a -: Ac1.11-:1.-, t' . - -44 . " ( v-4 z:4 . aim ,i, ,,_,..__ , i \ it _ _1 .. ilr wii I l , i . .....i • 7O i • - am 1414a r„is_ ' \, ‘ -otv if, . ,...... . iq -----771_,.!!1.5.13,sirr,-- :' i ire- 7 Atli?' / • 2.0 �, l' - - L�r�• ' . *Ilit iii 1 o i —:1. sir; t►''1�'�� Iliabiop,.." 4. 4. �. a �' w y 4 /� , ,\i, t-L... r.;.:m 4,-i,:0-Ez,-o,tir!.-...-im iitv,. ,1■ .rrrtr,L.-i.lTrpi.ir.r.ime.,nm„ii1RiiiitopTvr.iiia l„0oifiticitr „ rs rA T ems.. 1k/.vi,..,-.t.., r...iv.10i4e0,,A-rfir,:.„K_,ikt,l iV\.kl,i,ii,'_.•\e0,wf, i,tp al.�i , -' r ' its rk,t/i %" -4 • • ,. .' L 111114* 1 .( ": 'KW . '-gl -111W. ='› L‘ej- • . i - , -- gari .-016., — tip:As_ - --- - •.,_ . . N.Iiiir.4•04k- ' 4*.: //__, .! . - . s,. itag.J... ,it.,..."04k. ----ily A,ANtz4-------Nk . • .. -orrimport,A ifigljr -6,k N.N,N ... / :, '. 1110,11114 1410 . .. .. .G. J. IA i 4..-- . (.4,iti -ii-finilw ------fr Z--- /--4 ii- '•-•4-'4\7‘, .t. VIVW • ' , -*III ; Appetii, - f"if ii . : mipt 4 . . Q.....vA, tso, , . .,.. 1 itallilk tegrk. NI 1m..r" s' _4' • Ewa - iV ..• ‘ii- PA. -/ . ="1-- ra, tk t i• 10 -„""mot.\/•i,.:.: j771P-4a-?0 -',.t - nma - • , � (- �= rawly( - .. v. A - ....k___'_•' Des • .1S ri !', iK will -1111i1 , ....,„: . ' •----v- •1 jic,„ P j. rt ;lir a hig2-1:- \A.- i pg gar I/. . ill 7- ; roml ' 7NN...11Kird.. r,„1 ,g . ,j. '- . i,.• I ? RA1410111 - 11101111111 ,,,,,,,: Or I ' w is vy� o . ,t ._ � ww �N -(V • '''----- Far. ,fs,....„.....k. • , . cv .• P-A 01 fpri - a %., - low lk 1 -_ . • : Wier Milir"t'-,\Iritafirr ti • , k 0,- • __,,,.,_.'2.(c_7.1_, 4. .___ .___• . Om ... • ii • ..... 741 MO liar. . . 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION 4 .., lot, ‘,..4 - . 'vall`ALPI,,,,� ,....... ---,. ,.3.4'~"' ISOPLUVIALS OF 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ry ��,a ��m�TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES • N� r _ leler- qi • ff , 'i• 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mlles N ^` ..., y�• C.'- ' • • Ai rt.". 1/9� i:so0,000 3.5.1-8 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL ' FIGURE 3.5.1E 10-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS - - 2.1 '..-------...,,iii..NTIrg" 4.4.116 4 WA- 1 . --- -. -: AlY . ,__ .! iill.taer :Atter--\- 7 rtiLo.. if -\..i ' A Asf. iiirlikill 25 - ' i •- ta PM' .' 4 mrstimixi Li N, , . . 2.6 . ,- edi.. ; /. ,„;,.., i • . _..1 • - ki "sill Ilr'‘A-.11M ' 28 • .--It---DiTOP....13-..- it. : 2 No Appo 1 z.t\ - = "-A ....inikl&\544fr.,. yi _.i. -k? . 00.., -- I,/ - du, ..,". ,, „ARV P1---mit, .ma „a, cm--- A 3.0 •-. r Ik' !III:P'� j ay\ " . ''''''' '"411 ' ..-. :. .Mtaril 1 i 4 1 AL‘11 . .:: '. ai '!,i . * 1111,<a I _- ri4l_.,t ki. t, ice: >:= it, 1 11 al, "its.,V. --/ 'aft14,- ',3.,2 • ; . ,t1- - i I . ,r114, _ . tAk47 4 . ' \ligi ''''.4\ ''' ) 1 ' , i , iiikti;,,.\\1 . If lat - - 1) .. - _ '-' ••=. ' -.'1A- Nk.1,_4•77 At: .. tiviNtll... my r , k----1-41IL , ... I i . tritivcak-tA,./.4...,,,A.7,Trikz, ...- ..,..,. 44g. ,/ ,11- .,\.._ 011.,:wirtemk„ ,_,.. . w ..4.„.1.A„ ..,. \ „...:-. ii..• I : . lotto — 4 . �1 � \ 4 ..___ ,,.. .\..7j— ; , 1 . i i ! o �,\ ,i ,i itIII= % Lit 4 ( V� ii=li ) / ."..le >. si, ri \ K ),/ , rilmi'z-r:li i ot Fir ti14*- wow" \-._ , .'. rA.---. 9 '441 .,. . , .7.... •( . .,........ • ,.,_ .... , - , ‘ k f - APAVIllin -- i illAraffillirlr # I i . .. . . . V -N...J- . A ANLIV112016111-4./.417 . - \-1,-- -- \.-",-,7; obsaiimPUt'lk S ICW...WW44-4114 V _ ' /or :wank ... , . s pp 4.1111,ii!'..11,.0.1."we\Lip ., hi ' . . • ( L '. 111 .44 Oil. viajpg_ ,f/- i --,t4.t 4# •; - . \ ., ..% lr ,,,,„. ., . . ... . . ,.! .„ ______. . r .. olik .A • . \.. At iI. , ws.FINSLI ��i )-YEARS A - . 24-HOUR PRECIPITATIONO3 r ,-- r `L. L1�� eil - ,,� 3.4 ISOPLUVIALS OF 10-YEAR 24HOUR �O F. ' , i •� . TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES eg," - air . I I -3 2 - 0 , 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mlles !L,3A J V•� -=i 3.5.1-10 41,5 1/90 40 ' KING COUNTY, WAS HINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL IGURE 3.5.1H 100-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS 123 ..': IkliAtirilitr i'3_1`.)1 4 -'7,.., -'- ..7-'2,,f 411, N.'- ., . - 3. 9". .,, �� % Ti. 8%17 : dair A "T" ,iiiiike-ili -di _ e��ls■r- ��0 PPlik44-1-r-"&lito 'r AkalAlti-441Witt.f •'' ';i4k,..44.111F", - 111.- IL lit, I .1 ...:4016 . .-.411,v, . ‘—lifoitvotrAce,,,,..z.,, ._..._.::_h_..,11„,...„.._ .0 Is la. litivimi- C fail / NY4 Viiiall- jaliP*. 0 Itwollitil ' ritai,,,.4_1.,,,.' 44.kr, ,a1 ,. .40 ,,wil'''gagivirOl .:.4174., 4R - g• : -Ai•,71(111:41.7iteriM1101111Nic moggs‘iw, . , 1 e"/ Atlit04\11 I . Mk \ IF ` w \i'll'T ' • ' , 1 i PIL 16.S. siliNho jkligtilakelp,,,, 1.11/4 '1 ‘. • tf .. "IiiikAii 1101941061---:.%N , iw. loi ;0AI. IIIIVAi i %, - . Y-- ..'igi\. .„,.� _mow . .., I f -'411.0 i / tiFit111011104 -41 ' r"'"- =----- -re% r, -. Il ` ilk_ . ), ► Al i r- ‘... ... I" am opraumovil 446. lbw ;. F.4,p; -;tAit ,.:,, , mitipiratotwa,1 iikoyi . \la lbritti 1111-4mOr --011/01x . -- ,, f MO• / fj iief re .11 Nick -,-4° ��, , Ilpisr: l, ---iliAiligik otill 1.,- • .. , , • Fit irl, .,„ .y.' merjr ,'‘C ..40642fosiiidi „A ,,lumuy411441, ihfi _ le,, ,,,,,. r i \- __.. . .-.-- \-_-_ 17A,Na4-11.146, A si.,,,,r,11 ,-- - A, 1 inn ,w l gai i fi - • '41 . 1 bct= NI 11 • • 1„, w --pr. _.! .„ _____ ___ . pp/ .„ Air , . ,---- .4... , tk, A ' ; fit,. ., , Q. ,b •:b_r_ 1:. (EAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION ' eis�fir/�/1 6.5-.. '-----ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 24-HOUR pe• ete rOR I lir 5.5 TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES Qc• 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Miles 3.5.1-13 N. �Q •r - i:300,000 1!90 KING 1 1 ,r>S S AkF (Joins sheet 5) Amc ISSAQUAH I?MI. 10' 1 e80000 1 .• - r . • - ti '.(�11.t1 f I :•,I.,i..,•:i: 0. .' V f• � •`'.' °�1%,.:. II • vy +I��;�1 i I�`::_ 1�I +�. ilL �^{:16.*� �• ,yrq, ,'YS'i n \ \ \..;•�f• 4mC i „c �' t• r:y•• 1�. .',. (.5 ; '•��'=,e. 'd'.'�f�f�,.--�'•'.u r - \=__ \ ,s 4liy/n41tr $'gh�sc' , {{{L;0 -�_ I. i '':�, 0' • •r_ _Qr :•a:<.. > .�' 00: ill . 1---8. \\"' --(t-tjallillictj;.,•-.:_drrl-- y*, : 9 - - ..,. ,.. ,...n..71'1,. .:-- ..,..: .i;'',. 3.1.,',,,;'.-.117._••"".1..., .....••1--_ ..." :* : . .15,,..,,!•.-L:‘.44-f...1.„Lt... ;„.:;,... til : \Ae 'plc. 14B*AllTIM''"--;! .:.:77-----. (.-..,,....•,,. i.'f-'1;•:!:.."'." •.".z.'' .. .L.''. ...-:-. -:'7f. —...,'.-..... i ..-'-7,;,&'•,k,..I'=. ..'_Ofi:-..:4,1,-ii. ?1.-i....i.:.1.:'4_;.7.. • If r if ',' ■■ .r�Traiipr ;. •'w•: n, ,,Ev6 , ✓ •t, ',rr� i • ;BM� 1' _��I. ,I� I�•a bc ark.•.. �'A•. . u i II '.'B IIgM =`:" - na _ }; B�•. /� �, y�� 1 * �._n•..� ■ 's• '3r KR: n v• c, 3;.'•r. ►tk .Y�: V/ 1 i'GreenwoodTG•e L:ei•' ,4'. _• --.. .II;:_: , . ,:•. *.-'.ii .a •;4, 'c_•i • • e- i EvD.• I/ r t-I• I;. f;:,.,. '',� ^�...,v?t e•;� a, ..;1• F'=•{ -.! ,.<{. isAkF �� / r` '.,.., •' v• ri"� -r (`a.•I ♦ I . ' v r •.!I:, ..'�''-.� :=' ,.,ys•_.``..,,` + :..JQyJ'{•,:,y .::s.;•�':,.,1't;•4 ,a„ :�`,•` 111 ` 1 �r =�- -� r,s-• �bt I:7C: ,•: .. :1 .*�� :'+, :ram l.t1.;- Z, • . �• f1t_Oli '` EVC In ' <'S,.• >.. �i.< c Yj• Cem1 '� � ; An ,.-fir,.. . • .-.�.<yr;...�.:'^�i'tl'- ice=��`�~NO • '� ' ._cim i �' `. ,i, 'VI rc`a•.may:.: ,.-0,.."y.4 4,?z,_ ig..i.y'r3• �•r--".j. •y- . 1.•'^ • " • Pc (GRAVEL 'PIT ��\\ -.; a:A'Q"%'x:,.• - l'ai Yr��\.0 .•• • , c..-.'•' lti N. i'1-'F`.• ,' �-- - \`I�P321: ' n 'K�ti"`g,''u'r`�,I :Ai � - -- `= 1 _; _'.. 4/SySC:'•Itti:t: • • '•RhN -4// I 1 1 ' `. ( .0 71P`.p,'I ••o r•••-,.•�•'••• • 1. - <;.;r _I . - •,''-t:• ,S •v '' `\JC •'AkF' i 11kF 1 �:\CIc. ..r �•• ._<,;:'.(• `1,�� s•:,., �r:,,.- .�•N4. .�� • . 4,' d� \ - I • 1 �'::, L.u:.iJ�� '�'`'•y�j;7. <-I.4f ^'i'.•u•� . I11 • • • 1� itiVs. ,ns y:�;;AkF _:,. ,,'•w;.L cry •r.'`,rxy •rPr. • �•< ----- �,. .. a...Eve:"`. p •a ,�, - — —'•-`-- -- �\-- —--- . trr,rr --�-.4.•� ((44 �y a ^�` 1 ' --I = • • :----.1,..,....,.....,...Agc BM 137• AkF l'41:::::::::::;'ST:•itiv°J.: & ` PY , • f e,: t . � j'- \ AgC ' ;-�ti:. 41�., '.i•' ro•:o� 1 - �, :.AkF' ` . li, . • . .�. ..,- , �!' '' -9 a. ; � ' / 1 a` .' yO6 '� I AgD ^�!` � � � ''. i.� iI / �• ® Pc�••• :-. -9 .. „ I \��< 8 `�,. � � II CM .P A ; IRE ,Substa I N, `- r I `;��C ` I, �1 ` AkF ap ; �; � r, • . � � • • ,< i ; y \ � � r . ` kF -- / 21 t s,s_.,,s.,• --?.. . '. • Apri....--:i•-. ,;-:-, . ..: % ilt. ---, / 1 ..- -,...,;'.;"h• ...'°- . • 455 I ‘Itk , ,f 4.1 -'a =• el, ��. ;!�gC °` AkF I..' r \`, \ _\� �NI .. (‘ \„ \� • \``n -:I'..; \uI •_AkF �_ r. • �:-.- ..-.�_ �� vq4`. ,AgC ,, • Park t ,e, c.._, so.:,.. .,. jitaii .......i. ,..... : :: `/ 7 �jl -1`0'• EvC / • / +• --•{c3A • .� '1� I AgD / AkF AgC —� I 4 B I . l I `''; r- Cam7....____,„, - \l,_--11141r AgC �j �C' AgD —""1111141,, (ri < 'r'.AkF�.'. 1[F' 428• •.._ J _— -J .-ABB 1 m` --P/PEL/N ' . / I OrUr \. '' 27 >`� ° • isi 1111111\:: 26 — I �` 4921 $ I I I II 3►\ r 1�� _. •F '. e mgc ` I ��I o �\ `/ r•• AmC1 Ip 11 n •• •"„_ I�\` ♦ `vim � 1 F V S' ,I \17:7 AgC �� '1age +,' .11 V II•III II 1/ i �\‘ � II Vi4%:ss_ !I • 0I \\ \ KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL (2) CN values can be area weighted when they apply to pervious areas of similar CN's (within 20 CN points). However, high CN areas should not be combined with low CN areas (unless the low CN areas are less than 15% of the subbasin). In this case, separate hydrographs should be generated and summed to form one hydrograph. FIGURE 3.5.2A HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP OF THE SOILS IN KING COUNTY HYDROLOGIC HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP GROUP* SOIL GROUP GROUP* At- Alderwood, C Orcas Peat D Arents, Alderwood Material C Oridia D Arents, Everett Material• B Ovall C Beausite C Pilchuck C Bellingham D Puget D Briscot D .Puyallup B Buckley D Ragnar B Coastal Beaches Variable Renton D Earlmont Silt Loam D Riverwash ' . Variable Edgewick C Salal C Everett A/B 'Sammamish D Indianola A Seattle D Kitsap C • Shacar D Klaus C Si Silt C Mixed Alluvial Land Variable Snohomish D Neilton A Sultan C Newberg B • Tukwila D Nooksack C Urban Variable Normal Sandy Loam D Woodinville D HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS A. (Low runoff potential). Soils having high infiltration rates, even when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of deep,well-to-excessively drained sands or gravels. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. B. (Moderately low runoff potential). Soils having moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of moderately fine to moderately coarse textures. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. C. (Moderately high runoff potentiai). Soils having slow Infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and . consisting chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine to fine textures. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. . D. (High runoff potential). Soils having very slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a hardpan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. , * From SCS,TR-55, Second Edition,June 1986, Exhibit A-1. Revisions made from SCS, Soil Interpretation Record, Form #5, September 1988. IS 3.5.2-2 11/92 ' KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL ;TABLE 3.5.2B SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type 1A rainfall distribution, 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION AB CD Cultivated land(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89 Wood or forest land: undisturbed or older second growth 42 64 76 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. good condition: grass cover on 75% or more of the area 68 80 ,86 90 fair condition: grass cover on 50% to 75%of the area 77 85 90 92 Gravel roads and parking lots 76 85 89 91 Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 87 89 Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs, etc. 98 98 98 98 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 100 - Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 DU/GA 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA 30 impervious portion 3.0 DU/GA 34 of the site or basin 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 'DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU/GA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 'DU/GA • 56 Planned unit developments, % impervious condominiums, apartments, must be computed commercial business and industrial areas. (1) For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. 3.5.2-3 11/92 3/5/97 3 : 52 : 23 pm Barghausen Engineers page 1 UNION PLAZA PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BCE #6042 , FILE #6042-A BASIN SUMMARY ' BASIN ID: Al NAME: 2YR PRE DEVELOPED RUNOFF SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 .85 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs . RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 2 . 85 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 81. 00 0. 00 TC • 21. 05 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 120. 00 ns: 0.4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0667 TcReach - Shallow L: 90. 00 ks: 3 . 00 s: 0. 2440 TcReach - Channel L: 200. 00 kc:20. 00 s: 0. 0700 PEAK RATE: 0.23 cfs VOL: 0. 14 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: A2 NAME: 10YR PRE DEVELOPED RUNOFF SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 .85 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 2 .85 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 81. 00 0. 00 TC • 21. 05 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 120. 00 ns: 0. 4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0667 TcReach - Shallow L: 90. 00 ks: 3 . 00 s: 0. 2440 TcReach - Channel L: 200. 00 kc:20. 00 s: 0. 0700 PEAK RATE: 0. 62 cfs VOL: 0. 29 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: A3 NAME: 100YR PRE DEVELOPED RUNOFF SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 .85 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 2 . 85 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 81. 00 0. 00 TC • 21. 05 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 120. 00 ns: 0. 4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0667 TcReach - Shallow L: 90. 00 ks: 3 . 00 s: 0. 2440 TcReach - Channel L: 200. 00 kc: 20. 00 s: 0 . 0700 PEAK RATE: 1. 13 cfs VOL: 0 . 48 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 3/5/97 3 :52 : 23 pm. Barghausen Engineers page 2 UNION PLAZA PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BCE #6042 , FILE #6042-A BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: A4 NAME: 2YR POST DEVELOPED RUNOFF SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 61 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0. 21 Acres 2 .40 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 98. 00 TC • 6. 00 min 5. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 1. 25 cfs VOL: 0. 37 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: A5 NAME: 10YR POST DEVELOPED RUNOFF SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 61 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0. 21 Acres 2 .40 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 98 . 00 TC • 6. 00 min 5. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 1. 89 cfs VOL: 0. 56 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: A6 NAME: 100YR POST DEVELOPED RUNOFF SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 61 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 .90 inches AREA. . : 0. 21 Acres 2 .40 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 98. 00 TC 6. 00 min 5. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 2 . 59 cfs VOL: 0. 78 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: A7 NAME: 1/3 2YR PRECIP POST DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 61 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 0. 66 inches AREA. . : 0. 21 Acres 2 . 40 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 98. 00 TC • 6 . 00 min 5. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0. 32 cfs VOL: 0. 09 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min 3/5/97 3 : 30:44 pm Barghausen Engineers page 3 UNION PLAZA PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BCE #6042 , FILE #6042-A HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf\AcFt Acres 1 0.231 480 6254 cf 2 . 85 2 0. 619 480 12798 cf 2 . 85 3 1. 128 480 21081 cf 2 .85 4 1. 253 470 16105 cf 2 . 61 5 1. 886 470 24452 cf 2 . 61 6 2 . 588 470 33805 cf 2 . 61 7 0. 231 660 16105 cf 2 . 61 8 0. 619 520 24452 cf 2 . 61 9 1. 128 510 33805 cf 2 . 61 _ I, 3/5/97 3 : 30: 48 pm Barghausen Engineers page 4 UNION PLAZA PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BCE #6042, FILE #6042-A STAGE STORAGE TABLE TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. 1 Description: PRELIMINARY POND Length: 50. 00 ft. Width: 50. 00 ft. Side Slope 1: 3 Side Slope 3 : 3 Side Slope 2 : 3 Side Slope 4 : 3 Infiltration Rate: 0. 00 min/inch STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- i 100.00 0.0000 0.0000 102.60 8739 0.2006 105.20 22799 0.5234 107.80 43447 0.9974 100.10 253.01 0.0058 102.70 9173 0.2106 105.30 23464 0.5386 107.90 44389 1.0190 100.20 512.10 0.0118 102.80 9615 0.2207 105.40 24138 0.5541 108.00 45344 1.0410 100.30 777.32 0.0178 102.90 10066 0.2311 105.50 24821 0.5698 108.10 46310 1.0631 100.40 1049 0.0241 103.00 10524 0.2416 105.60 25515 0.5858 108.20 47288 1.0856 100.50 1326 0.0305. 103.10 10990 0.2523 105.70 26219 0.6019 108.30 48278 1.1083 100.60 1611 0.0370 103.20 11465 0.2632 105.80 26933 0.6183 108.40 49280 1.1313 100.70 1901 0.0436 103.30 11948 0.2743 105.90 27658 0.6349 108.50 50294 1.1546 100.80 2198 0.0505 103.40 12440 0.2856 106.00 28392 0.6518 108.60 51321 1.1782 100.90 2502 0.0574 103.50 12939 0.2971 106.10 29137 0.6689 108.70 52359 1.2020 101.00 2812 0.0646 103.60 13448 0.3087 106.20 29892 0.6862 108.80 53410 1.2261 101.10 3129 0.0718 103.70 13965 0.3206 106.30 30658 0.7038 108.90 54473 1.2505 101.20 3453 0.0793 103.80 14490 0.3327 106.40 31434 0.7216 109.00 55548 1.2752 101.30 3783 0.0869 103.90 15025 0.3449 106.50 32220 0.7397 109.10 56636 1.3002 101.40 4121 0.0946 104.00 15568 0.3574 106.60 33018 0.7580 109.20 57736 1.3254 101.50 4465 0.1025 104.10 16120 0.3701 106.70 33826 0.7765 109.30 58849 1.3510 101.60 4817 0.1106 104.20 16681 0.3829 106.80 34645 0.7953 109.40 59975 1.3768 101.70 5176 0.1188 104.30 17251 0.3960 106.90 35475 0.8144 109.50 61113 1.4030 101.80 5542 0.1272 104.40 17830 0.4093 107.00 36316 0.8337 109.60 62265 1.4294 101.90 5915 0.1358 104.50 18418 0.4228 107.10 37168 0.8533 109.70 63429 1.4561 102.00 6296 0.1445 104.60 19016 0.4365 107.20 38031 0.8731 109.80 64606 1.4832 102.10 6684 0.1534 104.70 19623 0.4505 107.30 38905 0.8931 109.90 65797 1.5105 102.20 7080 0.1625 104.80 20239 0.4646 107.40 39791 0.9135 110.00 67000 1.5381 102.30 7483 0.1718 104.90 20865 0.4790 107.50 40687 0.9341 110.00 67000 1.5381 102.40 7894 0.1812 105.00 21500 0.4936 107.60 41596 0.9549 102.50 8312 0.1908 105.10 22145 0.5084 107.70 42515 0.9760 3/5/97 3 : 30:48 pm Barghausen Engineers page 5 UNION PLAZA PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BCE #6042, FILE #6042-A STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. 1 Description: RESTRICTOR MANHOLE Outlet Elev: 100. 00 Elev: 98 . 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 2 . 6250 in. Elev: 101. 60 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 4 . 5234 in. Elev: 102 . 10 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: 4 . 3125 in. STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 100.00 0.0000 102.60 1.2136 105.20 2.3685 107.80 3.1098 100.10 0.0591 102.70 1.2806 105.30 2.4014 107.90 3.1347 100.20 0.0836 102.80 1.3434 105.40 2.4337 108.00 3.1595 100.30 0.1024 102.90 1.4029 105.50 2.4657 108.10 3.1841 100.40 0.1183 103.00 1.4597 105.60 2.4972 108.20 3.2084 100.50 0.1322 103.10 1.5140 105.70 2.5283 108.30 3.2326 100.60 0.1448 103.20 1.5662 105.80 2.5591 108.40 3.2567 100.70 0.1564 103.30 1.6165 105.90 2.5894 108.50 3.2805 100.80 0.1672 103.40 1.6652 106.00 2.6194 108.60 3.3042 100.90 0.1774 103.50 1.7124 106.10 2.6491 108.70 3.3276 101.00 0.1870 103.60 1.7582 106.20 2.6784 108.80 3.3510 101.10 0.1961 103.70 1.8027 106.30 2.7074 108.90 3.3741 101.20 0.2048 103.80 1.8461 106.40 2.7361 109.00 3.3972 101.30 0.2132 103.90 1.8885 106.50 2.7645 109.10 3.4200 101.40 0.2213 104.00 1.9299 106.60 2.7926 109.20 3.4427 101.50 0.2290 104.10 1.9703 106.70 2.8204 109.30 3.4653 101.60 0.2365 104.20 2.0099 106.80, 2.8479 109.40 3.4877 101.70 0.4194 104.30 2.0487 106.90 2.8752 109.50 3.5099 101.80 0.4992 104.40 2.0868 107.00 2.9022 109.60 3.5320 101.90 0.5619 104.50 2.1241 107.10 2.9290 109.70 3.5540 102.00 0.6156 104.60 2.1608 107.20 2.9555 109.80 3.5759 ' 102.10 0.6636 104.70 2.1968 107.30 2.9818 109.90 3.5976 102.20 0.8671 104.80 2.2322 107.40 3.0078 110.00 3.6191 102.30 0.9739 104.90 2.2671 107.50 3.0336 , 102.40 1.0628 105.00 2.3014 107.60 3.0592 102.50 1.1416 105.10 2.3352 107.70 3.0846 3/5/97 3 : 30:49 pm Barghausen Engineers page 6 UNION PLAZA PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BCE #6042 , FILE #6042-A LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> STORAGE DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) 2YR ROUTING 0.23 1.25 1 1 101.53 7 4562.60 cf 10YR ROUTING 0.62 1.89 1 1 102.01 8 6322.58 cf 100YR ROUTING 1.13 2.59 1 1 102.48 9 8242.42 cf 3/5/97 3 :54 : 36 pm Barghausen Engineers page 1 UNION PLAZA PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BCE #6042 , FILE #6042-B BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: B1 NAME: 2YR PREDEVELOPED RUNOFF SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0. 62 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0. 62 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 81. 00 0. 00 TC • 29. 53 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 215. 00 ns: 0. 4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0750 PEAK RATE: 0. 04 cfs VOL: 0. 03 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min BASIN ID: B2 NAME: 10YR PREDEVELOPED RUNOFF SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0. 62 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0. 62 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 81. 00 0. 00 TC • 29. 53 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 215. 00 ns: 0. 4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0750 PEAK RATE: 0. 12 cfs VOL: 0. 06 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: B3 NAME: 100YR PREDEVELOPED RUNOFF SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0. 62 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 .90 inches AREA. . : 0. 62 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 81. 00 0. 00 TC • 29. 53 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 215. 00 ns: 0.4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0750 PEAK RATE: 0. 21 cfs VOL: 0. 11 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: B4 NAME: 1/3 2YR PRECIP POSTDEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1. 34 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 0. 66 inches AREA. . : 0. 11 Acres 1. 23 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 98. 00 TC • 6. 00 min 5. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 0. 16 cfs VOL: 0. 05 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min i 3/5/97 3 : 54 :36 pm Barghausen Engineers page 2 UNION PLAZA PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BCE #6042, FILE #6042-B BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: B5 NAME: 10YR POSTDEVELOPED RUNOFF SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1. 34 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 .90 inches AREA. . : 0. 11 Acres 1.23 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 98. 00 TC 6. 00 min 5. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 0.97 cfs VOL: 0. 29 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: B6 NAME: 100YR POSTDEVELOPED RUNOFF SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1.34 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs - RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION. • 3 .90 inches AREA. . : 0. 11 Acres 1. 23 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 98. 00 TC 6. 00 min 5. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 1. 33 cfs VOL: 0. 40 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: B7 NAME: 1/3 2YR PRECIP POSTDEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1. 34 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 0. 66 inches AREA. . : 0. 11 Acres 1. 23 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 98 . 00 TC • 6. 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 0. 16 cfs VOL: 0. 05 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min 3/5/97 3 :7 : 16 pm Barghausen Engineers page 3 UNION PLAZA PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BCE #6042 , FILE #6042-B HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf\AcFt Acres 1 0. 043 490 1361 cf 0. 62 2 0. 116 480 2784 cf 0. 62 3 0. 214 480 4586 cf 0. 62 4 0. 642 470 8261 cf 1. 34 5 0.967 470 12545 cf 1. 34 6 1. 328 470 17346 cf 1. 34 7 0. 043 1460 6056 cf 1. 34 8 0. 116 910 9889 cf 1. 34 9 0. 214 770 14511 cf 1. 34 3/5/97 3 :7 : 21 pm Barghausen Engineers page 4 UNION PLAZA PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BCE #6042, FILE #6042-B STAGE STORAGE TABLE TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN. ID No. 3 Description: PRELIMINARY POND Length: 50. 00 ft. Width: 50. 00 ft. Side Slope 1: 3 Side Slope 3 : 3 Side Slope 2 : 3 Side Slope 4: 3 Infiltration Rate: 0. 00 min/inch STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 100.00 0.0000 0.0000 102.60 8739 0.2006 105.20 22799 0.5234 107.80 43447 0.9974 100.10 253.01 0.0058 102.70 9173 0.2106 105.30 23464 0.5386 107.90 44389 1.0190 100.20 512.10 0.0118 102.80 9615 0.2207 105.40 24138 0.5541 108.00 45344 1.0410 100.30 777.32 0.0178 102.90 10066 0.2311 105.50 24821 0.5698 108.10 46310 1.0631 100.40 1049 0.0241 103.00 10524 0.2416 105.60 25515 0.5858 108.20 47288 1.0856 100.50 1326 0.0305 103.10 10990 0.2523 105.70 26219 0.6019 108.30 48278 1.1083 100.60 1611 0.0370 103.20 11465 0.2632 105.80 26933 0.6183 108.40 49280 1.1313 100.70 1901 0.0436 103.30 11948 0.2743 105.90 27658 0.6349 108.50 50294 1.1546 100.80 2198 0.0505 103.40 12440 0.2856 106.00 28392 0.6518 108.60 51321 1.1782 100.90 2502 0.0574 103.50 12939 0.2971 106.10 29137 0.6689 108.70 52359 1.2020 101.00 2812 0.0646 103.60 13448 0.3087 106.20 29892 0.6862 108.80 53410 1.2261 101.10 3129 0.0718 103.70 13965 0.3206 106.30 30658 0.7038 108.90 54473 1.2505 101.20 3453 0.0793 103.80 14490 0.3327 106.40 31434 0.7216 109.00 55548 1.2752 101.30. 3783 0.0869 103.90 15025 0.3449 106.50 32220 0.7397 109.10 56636 1.3002 101.40 4121 0.0946 104.00 15568 0.3574 106.60 33018 0.7580 109.20 57736 1.3254 101.50 4465 0.1025 104.10 16120 0.3701 106.70 33826 0.7765 109.30 58849 1.3510 101.60 4817 0.1106 104.20 16681 0.3829 106.80 34645 0.7953 109.40 59975 1.3768 101.70 5176 0.1188 104.30 17251 0.3960 106.90 35475 0.8144 109.50 61113 1.4030 101.80 5542 0.1272 104.40 17830 0.4093 107.00 36316 0.8337 109.60 62265 1.4294 101.90 5915 0.1358 104.50 18418 0.4228 107.10 37168 0.8533 109.70 63429 1.4561 102.00 6296 0.1445 104.60 19016 0.4365 107.20 38031 0.8731 109.80 64606 1.4832 102.10 6684 0.1534 104.70 19623 0.4505 107.30 38905 0.8931 109.90 65797 1.5105 102.20 7080 0.1625 104.80 20239 0.4646 107.40 39791 0.9135 110.00 67000 1.5381 102.30 7483 0.1718 104.90 20865 0.4790 107.50 40687 0.9341 110.00 67000 1.5381 102.40 7894 0.1812 105.00 21500 0.4936 107.60 41596 0.9549 102.50 8312 0.1908 105.10 22145 0.5084 107.70 42515 0.9760 3/5/97 3 :7 :21 pm Barghausen Engineers page 5 UNION PLAZA PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BCE #6042, FILE #6042-B STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. 1 Description: ORIFICE STANDPIPE Outlet Elev: 100. 00 Elev: 98. 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 1. 0913 in. Elev: 101.90 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 2 .2969 in. Elev: 102 . 20 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: 2 . 2500 in. STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 100.00 0.0000 102.60 0.2588 105.20 0.5717 107.80 0.7631 100.10 0.0102 102.70 0.2783 105.30 0.5803 107.90 0.7695 100.20 0.0145 102.80 0.2963 105.40 0.5887 108.00 0.7759. 100.30 0.0177 102.90 0.3131 105.50 0.5970 108.10 0.7822 100.40 0.0204 103.00 0.3290 105.60 0.6052 108.20 0.7884 100.50 0.0229 103.10 0.3441 105.70 0.6133 108.30 0.7946 100.60 0.0250 103.20 0.3584 105.80 0.6212 108.40 0.8007 100.70 0.0270 103.30 0.3722 105.90 0.6291 108.50 0.8068 100.80 0.0289 103.40 0.3854 106.00 0.6369 108.60 0.8129 100.90 0.0307 103.50 0.3982 106.10 0.6445 108.70 0.8189 101.00 0.0323 103.60 0.4105 106.20 0.6521 108.80 0.8249 101.10 0.0339 103.70 0.4225 106.30 0.6596 108.90 0.8308 101.20 0.0354 103.80 0.4341 106.40 0.6670 109.00 0.8367 101.30 0.0368 103.90 0.4454 106.50 0.6743 109.10 0.8425 101.40 0.0382 104.00 0.4564 106.60 0.6816 109.20 0.8483 101.50 0.0396 104.10 0.4672 106.70 0.6887 109.30 0.8541 101.60 0.0409 104.20 0.4776 106.80 0.6958 109.40 0.8598 101.70 0.0421 104.30 0.4879 106.90 0.7029 109.50 0.8655 101.80. 0.0434 104.40 0.4979 107.00 0.7098 109.60 0.8711, 101.90 0.0445 104.50 0.5078 107.10 0.7167 109.70 0.8767 102.00 0.0910 104.60 0.5174 107.20 0.7235 109.80 0.8823 102.10 0.1109 104.70 0.5268 107.30 0.7303 109.90 0.8878 102.20 0.1264 104.80 0.5361 107.40 0.7369 110.00 0.8933 102.30 0.1830 104.90 0.5453 107.50 0.7436 102.40 0.2127 105.00 0.5542 107.60 0.7501 102.50 0.2372 105.10 0.5630 107.70 0.7567 3/5/97 3 :7 : 22 pm Barghausen Engineers page 6 UNION PLAZA PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BCE #6042, FILE #6042-B LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> STORAGE DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) 2YR ROUTING 0.04 0.64 3 1 101.81 7 5576.41 cf 10YR ROUTING 0.12 0.97 3 1 102.13 8 6811.65 cf 100YR ROUTING 0.21 1.33 3 1 102.40 9 7907.14 cf • 3/5/97 3 : 56: 30 pm Barghausen Engineers page 1 UNION PLAZA PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BCE #6042, FILE #6042-C BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: C1 NAME: 2YR PRE DEVELOPED RUNOFF SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0.42 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0. 28 Acres 0. 14 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 85. 00 98. 00 TC • 9 .85 min 10. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 130. 00 ns: 0. 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0600 PEAK RATE: 0. 11 cfs VOL: 0. 04 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: C2 NAME: 10YR PRE DEVELOPED RUNOFF SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0.42 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 .90 inches AREA. . : 0. 28 Acres 0. 14 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 85. 00 98. 00 TC 9 . 85 min 10. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 130. 00 ns: 0. 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0600 PEAK RATE: 0. 19 cfs VOL: 0. 07 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: C3 NAME: 100YR PRE DEVELOPED RUNOFF SBUH METHODOLOGY 1 TOTAL AREA • 0.42 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0. 28 Acres 0. 14 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 85. 00 98. 00 TC 9 . 85 min 10. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 130. 00 ns: 0. 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0600 PEAK RATE: 0. 29 cfs VOL: 0. 10 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: C4 NAME: 2YR POST DEVELOPED RUNOFF SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1. 89 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0. 15 Acres 1.74 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 98 . 00 TC 6. 00 min 5. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 0. 91 cfs VOL: 0. 27 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min 1 3/5/97 3 : 56: 30 pm Barghausen Engineers page 2 UNION PLAZA PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BCE #6042 , FILE #6042-C BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: C5 NAME: 10YR POST DEVELOPED RUNOFF SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1. 89 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0. 15 Acres 1.74 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 98 . 00 TC • 6. 00 min 5. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 1. 37 cfs VOL: 0.41 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: C6 NAME: 100YR POST DEVELOPED RUNOFF SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1. 89 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 .90 inches AREA. . : 0. 15 Acres 1. 74 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 98 . 00 TC 6. 00 min 5. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 1.87 cfs VOL: 0. 56 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: C7 NAME: 1/3 2YR PRECIP POST DEVELOPED SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1. 89 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 0. 66 inches AREA. . : 0. 15 Acres 1. 74 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 98 . 00 TC 6. 00 min 5. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 PEAK RATE: 0. 23 cfs VOL: 0. 07 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min 3/5/97 3 : 22 : 26 pm Barghausen Engineers page 3 UNION PLAZA PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BCE #6042 , FILE #6042-C HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf\AcFt Acres 1 0. 111 480 1710 cf 0. 42 2 0. 195 480 2886 cf 0.42 3 0.294 480 4270 cf 0.42 4 0. 908 470 11669 cf 1. 89 5 1. 366 470 17715 cf 1.89 6 1. 875 470 24488 cf 1. 89 7 0. 111 910 11661 cf 1. 89 8 0. 195 790 17683 cf 1. 89 9 0. 294 780 24397 cf 1. 89 3/5/97 3 : 22 : 31 pm Barghausen Engineers page 4 UNION PLAZA PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BCE #6042 , FILE #6042-C STAGE STORAGE TABLE TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. 1 Description: PRELIMINARY POND Length: 50. 00 ft. Width: 50. 00 ft. Side Slope 1: 3 Side Slope 3 : 3 Side Slope 2 : 3 Side Slope 4 : 3 Infiltration Rate: 0. 00 min/inch STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 100.00 0.0000 0.0000 102.60 8739 0.2006 105.20 22799 0.5234 107.80 43447 0.9974 100.10 253.01 0.0058 102.70 9173 0.2106 105.30 23464 0.5386 107.90 44389 1.0190 100.20 512.10 0.0118 102.80 9615 0.2207 105.40 24138 0.5541 108.00 45344 1.0410 100.30 777.32 0.0178 102.90 10066 0.2311 105.50 24821 0.5698 108.10 46310 1.0631 100.40 1049 0.0241 103.00 10524 0.2416 105.60 25515 0.5858 108.20 47288 1.0856 100.50 1326 0.0305 103.10 10990 0.2523 105.70 26219 0.6019 108.30 48278 1.1083 100.60 1611 0.0370 103.20 11465 0.2632 105.80 26933 0.6183 108.40 49280 1.1313 100.70 1901 0.0436 103.30 11948 0.2743 105.90 27658 0.6349 108.50 50294 1.1546 100.80 2198 0.0505 103.40 12440 0.2856 106.00 28392 0.6518 108.60 51321 1.1782 100.90 2502 0.0574 103.50 12939 0.2971 106.10 29137 0.6689 108.70 52359 1.2020 101.00 2812 0.0646 103.60 13448 0.3087 106.20 29892 0.6862 108.80 53410 1.2261 101.10 3129 0.0718 103.70 13965 0.3206 106.30 30658 0.7038 108.90 54473 1.2505 101.20 3453 0.0793 103.80 14490 0.3327 106.40 31434 0.7216 109.00 55548 1.2752 101.30 3783 0.0869 103.90 15025 0.3449 106.50 32220 0.7397 109.10 56636 1.3002 101.40 4121 0.0946 104.00 15568 0.3574 106.60 33018 0.7580 109.20 57736 1.3254 101.50 4465 0.1025 104.10 16120 0.3701 106.70 33826 0.7765 109.30 58849 1.3510 101.60 4817 0.1106 104.20 16681 0.3829 106.80 34645 0.7953 109.40 59975 1.3768 101.70 5176 0.1188 104.30 17251 0.3960 106.90 35475 0.8144 109.50 61113 1.4030 101.80 5542 0.1272 104.40 17830 0.4093 107.00 36316 0.8337 109.60 62265 1.4294 101.90 5915 0.1358 104.50 18418 0.4228 107.10 37168 0.8533 109.70 63429 1.4561 102.00 6296 0.1445 104.60 19016 0.4365 107.20 38031 0.8731 109.80 64606 1.4832 102.10 6684 0.1534 104.70 19623 0.4505 107.30 38905 0.8931 109.90 65797 1.5105 102.20 7080 0.1625 104.80 20239 0.4646 107.40 39791 0.9135 110.00 67000 1.5381 102.30 7483 0.1718 104.90 20865 0.4790 107.50 40687 0.9341 110.00 67000 1.5381 102.40 7894 0.1812 105.00 21500 0.4936 107.60 41596 0.9549 102.50 8312 0.1908 105.10 22145 0.5084 107.70 42515 0.9760 3/5/97 3 : 22 : 31 pm Barghausen Engineers page 5 UNION PLAZA PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BCE #6042, FILE #6042-C STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. 1 Description: RESTRICTOR MANHOLE Outlet Elev: 100. 00 Elev: 98 . 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 1. 7842 in. Elev: 101.70 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 1. 7930 in. Elev: 102 . 40 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: 1.7227 in. STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 100.00 0.0000 102.60 0.2581 105.20 0.4949 107.80 0.6439 100.10 0.0273 102.70 0.2733 105.30 0.5015 107.90 0.6489 100.20 0.0386 102.80 0.2870 105.40 0.5080 108.00 0.6539 100.30 0.0473 102.90 0.2996 105.50 0.5144 108.10 0.6588 100.40 0.0546 103.00 0.3115 105.60 0.5208 108.20 0.6637 100.50 0.0611 103.10 0.3227 105.70 0.5270 108.30 0.6686 ' 100.60 0.0669 103.20 0.3334 105.80 0.5332 108.40 0.6734 100.70 0.0723 103.30 0.3437 105.90 0.5393 108.50 0.6782 100.80 0.0773 103.40 0.3536 106.00 0.5453 108.60 0.6830 100.90 0.0820 103.50 0.3631 106.10 0.5513 108.70 0.6877 101.00 0.0864 103.60 0.3724 106.20 0.5571 108.80 0.6924 101.10 0.0906 103.70 0.3814 106.30 0.5630 108.90 0.6971 101.20 0.0946 103.80 0.3901 106.40 0.5687 109.00 0.7017 101.30 0.0985 103.90 0.3986 106.50 0.5744 109.10 0.7064 101.40 0.1022 104.00 0.4069 106.60 0.5801 109.20 0.7109 101.50 0.1058 104.10 . 0.4151 106.70 0.5857 109.30 0.7155 101.60 0.1093 104.20 0.4230 106.80 0.5912 109.40 0.7200 101.70 0.1126 104.30 0.4308 106.90 0.5967 109.50 0.7245 101.80 0.1435 104.40 0.4384 107.00 0.6021 109.60 0.7289 101.90 0.1581 104.50 0.4459 107.10 0.6075 109.70 0.7334 102.00 0.1699 104.60 0.4533 107.20 0.6128 109.80 0.7378 102.10 0.1804 104.70 0.4605 107.30 0.6181 109.90 0.7422 102.20 0.1898 104.80 0.4676 107.40 0.6233 110.00 0.7465 102.30 0.1986 104.90 0.4746 107.50 0.6285 102.40 0.2068 105.00 0.4815 107.60 0.6337 102.50 0.2401 105.10 0.4883 107.70 0.6388 3/5/97 3 : 22 : 32 pm Barghausen Engineers page 6 UNION PLAZA PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS BCE #6042, FILE #6042-C LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> STORAGE DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) 2YR ROUTING 0.11 0.91 1 1 101.64 7 4975.90 cf 10YR ROUTING 0.19 1.37 1 1 102.26 8 7313.98 cf 100YR ROUTING 0.29 1.87 1 1 102.86 9 9875.79 cf UNION PLAZA DETENTION AND WATER QUALITY VOLUME SUMMARY March 11, 1997 Our Job No. 6042 Basin A Storage volume required = 8,242 cf Water quality volume required = 4,101 cf Water quality surface area required = 1,137 sf Storage volume provided = Storage area x length of detention tank = 53.08 x 200 = 10,616 cf Water quality volume = dead storage x length of detention tank = 21.47 x 200 = 4,294 cf Water quality surface area provided = width of water surface (dead storage elevation) x length of detention tank = 9.6 x 200 = 1,920 sf Basin B Storage volume required = 7,907 cf Water quality volume required = 2,102 cf Water quality surface area required = 584 sf Storage volume provided = Storage area x length of detention tank = 60.54 x 163 = 9,868 cf Water quality volume = dead storage x length of detention tank = 13.91 x 163 = 2,267 cf Water quality surface area provided = width of water surface (dead storage elevation) x length of detention tank = 9 x 163 = 1,467 sf Basin C Storage volume required = 9,876 cf Water quality volume required = 2,972 cf Water quality surface area required = 823 sf Storage volume provided = Storage area x length of detention tank = 35.35 x 280 = 9,898 cf Water quality volume = dead storage x length of detention tank = 11.29 x 280 = 3,161.2 cf Water quality surface area provided = width of water surface (dead storage elevation) x length of detention tank = 7.6 x 280 = 2,128 sf 6042.003 [BAH/kn] 395.00 TOP OF PIPE :YY. QQ6i . .. \::::::::.::::::%::::::-.::::::::::::!:::::::'..,,:.::::.:1:::;,:...,,; ::-:,.;,:: :, , fi0 TOP OF DEAD 57 Q :..' >., AREA= 100TOPOFSEDIMESTOCE ///// NT 00 BOTTOM OF PIPE BASIN 'A' 10' DETENTION PIPE SCALE: 1"=2' 395.32 TOP OF PIPE • ..:. , °'AREA-60.54: . . .. . ... . . :. .. _ . .. . . : .. '9.0 ©f'_'.DEAD::STORAGE::,;. .. .. .. ,. .... ...:. . :. . .. AREA=13.91 SF 386.32 TOP OF SEDIMENT STORAGE / 385.32 BOTTOM OF PIPE BASIN 'B' 10' DETENTION PIPE SCALE: 1"=2' 398.21 TOP OF PIPE :: >... . .. ,.. :.. . 3 ,:9 2...: .:.... :. . ,. 95'`' `�'OP::OF°'QUAD::5TORA. . :: ' i EA=11.29 SF 391.21 TOP OF SEDIMENT STORAGE /A/R/ / 390.21 BOTTOM OF PIPE BASIN 'C' 96w DETENTION PIPE SCALE: 1"=2' V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ti VI. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES VU. BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLAN AREAS LI.! CC < , 5 • io C.5 I's\ .. \ V• /•--. . t Z ..".; .... ; 11 0 r"'•-• ''. ' ‘i•' Z Z i .• • 4. in 2 1 ( D Z c 3 :, • 1,,. e 0 8 Ln wt 6 i • •1.64.4,Z'' ...! id."4.. -‘../ 0 i.•. .. ..* :.-•!"‹. .' ' "Irr, y / ..... . i • ' ...0•••• •-•.... . t• i ./.... < = a. - • •• . 1 ..-•,,,.. 1. ) - nu OA 0 le II.\'"`• • *all Z .r . ii \ ,..„..... ...„ j,.....; y,__. 1, „ ,•,, t•-•-• ''''.•;,,t . Z . . o ' ' • ,,_.... 1 . : N' ,-,-11 , ilY 11. C. „ • • 01. • il , •' n , I ' 1 I . ‘.... ( "---\,--z). - - 11 If> 2 • , ..,..,. I ;#•- . 1 I I! i r•p 1 ---.7.- ' . :`--...- ii 1 13 •t . 1 ---1...... II, •II \ err`*.''f•-, ' • ---..14c. .. .. Ji II 0 -••• •-) o• I !is 1.` 1 1, 1 lic. . ifir.-.''\„---I. I ! 11 if g 'jib ,-.).) 1'1. 1/ li • 1,11-t-''''-'..--/-'-' II I • . 4 ., , 4_ , /B / • r..?-.- ....... .. . .11 g / j' 0'.-jd i •,..j-','Ji',./-13 ) i 1? 111.) • -v- \.1/4 ill /. . . . ....4.151,-2,9- ir s.,,,--• ) o r-k-' / / .1-'11fil••• . •- 1-/'-- ,..4, i ...7. : , ), ,,. • . ,- __, -- -,,m7 -----, -:, 41....... c!.; .7- --.. i., . . , ; III -‘,:-.--':--- -"--- • \ -3 7 ., i /11 IA ii ' ' \i•...... ) ..y._?• iid • ..... . I .1 i t L I . • ..*... ./ 1. _ i \ , ' I / . ,. . • . l\.. .\••-)111--"j: ' 1 4Ii I - 4.--\ / . .1 It .. • -. II < i .." 1,1 , I, • II j jit 1 0 II . ....../ i I , ? ,, /I • I ' .••••• • . I Ji 11 •1 . ,, . 1 • li cy I-• ‘ 11. : .. • 1,1 1 . i 1 • , • Z Z - - 21 II 1• r.. 1 /•, i _____..-- p ) 11/ (Cf • ' • / I . • ii u1..,4 r,.._ r• I I i i li •i 0 3 I, ., ‘ [... p ' ..-- • .i i j• ii I ... . • ii 1 di 1 ... , _ , ii ..., : 1, • ii ,.. r..... 1. .... .. • T V . _Jr./ "- ' i• i i . - • . ii .• . I .... • 1 '' 1.: 1 . ••• 1 i f i . . I i • .4.e-,;s---1 • 1 . flii / I .... 1 I • 1 \ • i /, , li I. c $ .. li i -.. . ..../ ,.5. R. ' . • i: ' 1; '' • / II 1., • . / I 1) . V5 . )) :•• ?. 111 i I. 2' . t i - • 1 ' ? _..ii 1 1 I .:1. g 1 • 1 ; . , )1 • ! • ,/ . • g. 1 ' r •I id ,•1W A 1 1 ; I s'7. •NII ° P lt )I:.J-•.., , , i 2. . • \ i I. 1 •. 41 i ' ., ' - .. 1 • 0. '',..... i I . fi W ii. \I ./ • a ! • o . . .... //I, 1. i 1, I 2 . j?' f "...--4-,2,/ditiv/ `-' II . . I) • - ., . 1.‘., ----,-. . ' • - r''' ''Illire . I i ' ‘11 li. r • • .. • !i : I -, g-• • 10":"409 . P 111 1 1 •') .1--,- _.,) m ,... 0 . . tr'--. '...--. ',,,..__L:1 Arr_r !::v ;...1.. ' • ... • . • • ' a •, ,, Cs . 0 P),..41! ./s. • . - / I ---/ -.\ ,^ai- ' • ,./..11121 I •. -- - • i __, . • .. . . . 'e i;--i- . ;1,,.•, ..le.a. ..• ,•••' Ii -1,\ r„„ . I ."i :2•74., !\.. ..( . No , i •\ . Li 11111Pr . . 1 i i .. _ ii .: . ,„.... .j A •.•0" . ' ''• li i I (I ...°. . i P AphiterfAiLl,i' Apr 11 .--.,..- i, . i , fr Ah.' 0 i I 1 . .17, r 4 I •••, „ .8,,.:..4 , • ... < ._ t ......... I it I'I :''', I • q • . ' L. i 1.. 1, . . i ) • I. $ fr,f... .1 il lhglIL ,. ligwiriti60. I, J.,....,:.„,„,'., _ - I illic-gr" . _ . NY. \ Ilk ‘.14 4414 . o, i S 4,-;::-I'-.4.. -,.. w ---- .. s',1 _ -II i4Ar"./.-- , .4'4" . - • , • . LLI cr . 7,....-13), „,,•rn __ .-iIpi .•g ..,,,,. 1141, MAIO • , N- fpligt.'AFil/FP tgarti ik-. i'WM 2.E2'.3 16119. . - `i.•• • . la -PEreilt40, ovt:..taerecoffi.:1;1711:41.,:e.-.„..,, . . _,„ • • •\ if Plill ' ,,,,„...,..........„,„....,„.,, ,.,. ...,, ,.......„,..__ • , .,,, NsepriL...4 ., . no. ,,,, ,„ .,., ...........7„,...„,,,,...., .,..,:,. . i ,,_,.. . • :,. „ _____.:r.,p.....,,,,,,,,,,, ,z.d.,,,B17.;,,,,, ...,,:•;.-ArAail -flf,'.13,kimiiirs itigp,In7asiphes.mt 4, 0,„ . •, ..414.1v_i ,......„,,mem IV:- • iloUll,-:.1/4\,, MC ri rlirtillh'itecw41.012137j12aair,.-_zr,,,„, ,, 60_1017Tii,%,„ ..,4,..,..e4,ifilliKillgir: litht 41".1114 • _: . IR if-..-.....&sal zrz•lv•-,211 ,I ..;guij,„A:3.AL' 7_2,167 ,r'w.--- 0c ,i, t.46111_1‘ k!PL--,..bi,v•-7.- . ,,,,,,, ,C• 'of 1.4", ' . 41 i utpl .d .ti .. .-7.4102Jfili 17.. ..: „;,7-•- *, 414..*:-.,-411 ,_,;..- --wmt;re.10.2atiivaorfmirctA ?UV • -541s Now- .4.-* .Ey"3 .._. r-oari,fasoi .,,... .„.„47,. ...1,, ,,,,-.........m.-.,,..i.F.,- i sir.,-,,,o•-.,,,,„„.---,„ --. ..v.z k,.... _ • m......,,,Ail.. ....„,,,,,,,,,,,_„,,,,,.„. ....„...,,,..........,.....,.....,,:zabi 12--- trot'r ipplifia....L. 4. p.,..-1;T.-----.;;•1.,. xi. 5: - -: •,---‘•:-4, ",,,,,- • CWS''Nu .1*, . lt:,•• Ileibiglarnle<iii SY t•P-etE,, ,I Or'ff:r. ..AINI • ill4 741:41s.a.... mg. oil gli-',Z7.1.v.i ii, , , E. • lows :•s• sr.r,:o '.,...,cank.,.411440,L.10,?.4:•7;-\.WNW . '''' `-:: • AXE - -c 7,..-4.1 i-11111EgEFF-Tift ., • i",' '7,..,..,. ,.. •- ,-,,,„,„„,,,, ragimmaw o•'OW B.„...rj''''..,!=iiii,SW,‘_....-:,,,,,,:-..-----iiirio."a.,01,...ziglip,c,),...._,.. iii........_ • • .........„,41!j, ,....4,4_ 0 L._ ii . . Ift■--;-0(7,74-"iik .ricor-,-- -INt-...,m_ Ni.. ..... *WM.!Ivith.--zw:::-z.;-"''-'vii•a--.1."--ifillir--""21`11 0,VgattlRMIKAVillim MeilliaLlifirie.- 4 . • ,if tie MI1111114 riAriilegatilePl. •W i',‘': 2,:,',--;,:,;',32,PFSZP•11.;IVII,00i',,r,..... .::..,.ek--.46..gly anion J''''2 !..b_aps_A_Li iwar- rimiteiNii,„ ;.i.,!..,-.; kiif •.1%4.• x -----•'.7.4.1.,..,,,,..ii. -liallalall•rfasli.tilbrAinaliz.`,'-' -: H. „, ) iZ4Plj- g:41.1LAMIAMil'Ziffrj•A- tli"••4'i . '''. V2Z•;"-rE . 4•°;!4".!. Alai'-' ..i.e..c,sv . gaigivozzei=Ev .,•44, :k; .•• . ',4,,„--:•..,„...,.:••z.,...Aaiiit,,,7:, ,.. ,t,4111„.t e;a40 , 1i .... -41.14111td:krtara,. 1 _CeettskiltiCS!..am.az dime' *. 1 1'5'. g . • .9.:-.r ,- • ' kridiff,r,fkr7.••;:•- I ii. Mg 103210 Mt ,.....' ii 1 : li • I • / • • • ,'''g Iviv---tr ..0'"''' I .1 .1 It • 1 ,) •j ,• :*.:Pli-V ti., i . . 1:---•• - 11.1 i •. 0 ' . I •\:.•..::: j . r u 0° • • • )1../ ---- j/ • ij P • 1 14.% ' )ik JJ jp•• •• .- • , --.r-----•- 50u":*.---142ii., . •/-------- • 0 rr ••-....,...,.., N. ‘, ,,-. _‘...kni i < 1 ' 1 \ ...... diali IINCIgno. Pk. fp •-.. . . i . \ i -... . • I-- - ---jY 1 I • ‘ . -:-.41-.. IC •••• /\''' \'-r--,I-7.\\111911L,Airt . . i, ( 7 • .... il 4 •- . , ' • -\\--....„ • . .... ,..•••-••...., ji .,/ • 'r----, . '.." ,.._____ -...--......... , • ....., \ . • • , . .,......."7-----N • ; ... . • • \ ..., . ......... • ' . • • . , . , • ' v.imige • . .•%, , . ‘witiao; • . . 1• . , .. .. •''.: .-i '‘• 4:.':- -. .• ,!. " ‘ , , ..: . ...-. _- . .--.-. .• - -\ Me."it'' .. •• - - is : 14 -.-14.' ...- ._ . ..-- 1\s•-•--'••-•1 4.•:CM ..A.,..4 ••'....:------. -- .. • \ r _ .. ....00 . , ._. 4. ... . \._ • -... ,.. _ _ .- .• z, . .. i . . :. , flft-t.... f N• ......'' ..11‘.11- s"Wi;t1.;- Irjr. t \\7, ... ,• • 1 - Ilikinir ....."'‘ j.-". ., .;.• ., VSSik W 1--‘: 1. -"-- • . • . : 1 NIIMNIP i ; '•\ 14 • . ...._. ray Riv. ... .•- -..::. . . :_- --__- ...,........ . , _. ,.. ,.. .• , - - / . 414::. tririgigii LiaiigrA 4,,,, ,_ t .._,....7„.• 2..._. :,.., • _. _ . ... • ,....: _Sart..11' •• ..r.1. 041 ..s:\ ---. • ... • . • . ..r. '...: • k .-‘-`.. ;.;.Millig!I q• eigkeitCP"PfAV4 'V. ..n 6.' _.. L. .. 7 . •• I.. • .- S-- - --\------.".-..-... : 11 irs,.RENONetjlitliT ..- r. .,,s • it,a ct(..A L)4 ! ,.....- . \ Z.- - . •t ''-:-•:-.' ....... : , ../ ., ,.nipioultip.. i.t. ---.1: •31mitirwAilik.• -; -14-- _,. ‘.11-4"4.7.1, •• . .._ _-. :.-.... . ...... . •sr- .RIVER- (i ,..... ._• • I - -....- ‘ It-Nttlitri. e . ..1' , .'4Iniiirketitr% ., :.i.- iteil: . ,.... c SN iOU .., -(---, . ••, „, . .... ,,-- m. 1.4...,...fh,.-<_,..,_00, V.'14 `12. 6*...'''i. s'NC-- '''''3 .--‘' iv. r ...4 -- . . . . lb; b ....t. .. hag „A`.....A Nort -2.::.•k . .... ,..... •-.r.I. . . • . ...(.. A ii ell: I ---1.,..-: ,,,,,, ., 6,1,,„fal Em2..r-ik . ii,------f_ „ BASIN -..t. • - • :tz • IV • • : 1.... tigiii; FigrriV J • . • .....,. 4. ,A ,04!AL ::1 i s.f.-- .. . . • % ...., ,. . ..:....-..-. . '!'‘• ' i t. ii •-/• • -s; ••a- .% -..--...eisimi . , ... • . . .. -. . ;.-jk -+4 ii.V.04., me6"[R.kitim!.q..111.14t•••,•-ligilliiiri Iiihit' • Olt N, : ---• - . ..•• IP.1k,..:‘,51 ..4.,../.4q ' IL ' c Snosuatmle Rim- ::...' !.7 ..:.- 0 • N. 7 - ' 7'.• .----11.33it.‘ I.I.‘1. +• . • "Z.: - ' ' '4. '''' ;,c ' -.4 i • 4.• k•-- - . ',:-•. .... ,s!.itS 1 : ..-- `'..-"k kohle.'-• / . -. \__:.9"'"'' :_.._, ,T-7.,1, .. :,--\,... . .., . e • -i •--"'" - . IR: if .Ar.'i I :-:c 1111 -se 4....4......1 , .... . ..... - •-• ••• .• ... • . ....• ---,..,,••• ,.. ....."• . %.- . • Y..6'. • .q • . . . . • • :;< ••?:NI: i ', RIVER .• • . ...• , .... . .. • 3 . / ,„_416. • , -, T ! • .: . -• . asn* ,, f...--, i.;: . '' • ' -"'1. . .l':-.:••`i - 91 ,rhilorr '11 `. s --- -.. - "-'...)a - -14FAV' , .., . c ••••.. . •4.t1 . Mir- ."41111%,. .., .,ima" • 1 V- !- . .-.71:i_.... ...--7---4-.'"-" -, . .•:,... , . V . .. 41 .1 ell jilt, is • ,...40 :::•-- • - -*-, •. . P U.9 ETIE\-!,iV:4-c11111Ar. '' /11.--i_lt44 '' 44- 1. ". .11Mit 4.1.1111*r-'-;------. • / ^ • .. • .-..... .;,_ .....z...7.1 •.1 I \1.15Ifr 'm ..7-C;sr IRO?..:Or N„ Niii,.:. P •) rgi. 6, 4 • .. . --1.-:::.„ -„, ..... ". ' •.. ''''t.'.i.f., ...-• 4404\-\\0\7:_ )1til f IF.;eillith. 1ff kli: 1, . iff /...,ft A .. ,..• ... . . , ..0K-,, . . -:,..• . _--.6.- :: ,- _:. - • „.. •-•?\1111ASIN -, .. -7:-= • A_ ..‘.N. 7 • J,' • _: -• i i ,r, -- •,?..Alia % lik...-1 14 - • -- 744111' ' . . ‘-iii•.-....:.-- . . . . *... ,, .:--, -• .; , mi.*Fork ..-":." - . •• _ :.....,_ - -' . 1 . a 11/WA I T.Z-4N s"-- ' "s•.-°' ...I. ., 'er` - . - V., ,. , . --, ...- . _ •._ " .. L-IC:Nr ... "Irk‘.11111V --4 mj: 11.17 . ":• . _,i(:. __If-- • , ' ' e:_. ....:_.i . •. • *--i. '4.-4,17:W•i VAlliiiie,!7-1- v.,. , ,,,,......c..... . ....., ,.. •,,. •,. - . ......_. %,.../. • -...44 ...V. I --SQU „vitifir ,,%,„,-"Erq -----. .. ., - -,,_ _ D . . t_ •--- .-zrz--.:1-- - 7.;•.•?:•: - ..• . ! k :.• I - .IMIA_ • -•'--.• ' kit • 'C. . i• "<e% 1 A:-. - \-- MA • •.. / : ' 1_71-- . • r',, • •=...-- . - - • NW*, it ttOSI' • slit ihnlitimit -77-" • , s-I- • • - •-•,11. 'a-•=s-4-...----:..% k' . :f._ 1111.).-- .'i',.• -: Pi tem I. 1 \ mil.,d . i •-;,...„). - . ; 1... ., MP filiMik N. .... • -...t; :-.-. ... 71., . -./...........„.....:-. --= . . ... •s. " _.1 .-r- .,- , • - a..- - I MN Ir • •li, ' i• r‘..-. r- "‘-‘.. --.--- . • j • rej. r ji(191 1 4,i „..„. South Fore -..• , 11.* Hi a ..,. .1. '' • . •• se. (. .. . „.„,,....!••:-... ., ._. . , • --.....- - -- , Figure 2 \ • ‘ . ......„,;.• • -- --, fir,sim j upp., -,_. . 4,-.._ _ .teglitakala filwr ., .---• - • -'NIS 11I - VP° . A 2 t. ,,,..,,,„, -jra• • ' `4--:------ _....,,r.A.,) If ),...:_ , 1 al N+17 .... I. .r.--:. ._. •,-; IiildrU•1.91.1E ...,...>\ 1.1•1,01:111. ' -FORE'S k - it*,1:• - DRAINAGE BASINS , , . , -- ..1: Lar$,_47,. -1.1121k INIVTITV4 /5:-.--• All-,1" . • / .._ King County i r_.. • k • '`.. •-. River I art;SEATTLE-46,0..7E86HE° I --.."\-. 1985•_._DRAINAG :7.- rA :.• , ...._.•_- _ - . 'w ,. 111111. Ar. kfr t________. '4'-' ..-: '• - r . \ i • ......... .....r 11 . • .s.-' . • , N • .- \k- - ‘1 i ,,,:........._ : 7- pawl jr.-31Vire -- - ... i - • i . •131 ifsar•Yli . ..'•IP" pgliall. ..:- . w .. 00... ) . i „.. )„........ ..s, , .. • . i . -- ••A„....,,, ,c,,,,, --ariX4 dit'1111.1421,411'r . 7 ‘',--- ..14. /- _ . • ... ...• "TACOMA • le . - l ... . ,., • ., .. . -'- ---• _ ) -,,„ ki\__... 4...4,%•i\---, (.1 mINMENEI Major Basin Boundary - r ,.G:Mitr.,,T; -.-'..-t.:.-triS% -• .---•'/ - ) • ,- , .( • 0 7/-- -,_..f."0--, WOW • '‘.. . ,. ..z_.,,,..... ...„.s ‘ __,------._.•--6. •r.:-..„. _,....,:: - ,_.__:._. .,• --.N. \ 0,..... ,-- Sub-Basin Boundary .1. - /1..., -si 47414 ,‘ .C.1 •Ci ‘N. • . e,• . .... 3 lot .. , . i ,.., . t....\ lir 4 • -, ., ..• ......--- . ••; :: 1 .`",,, Na I .. • I-• 4 :I )/ :---- ...- . .....,..I, 4.1 .../.. ' Source: King County Sensitive Areas -\_,._...,-•j• 0,... - Map Folio,Wetlands Supplement __ • '\. -1•::,,. . . . : , ••W !'.1-- , I r - ..,...,,, ..... _„.„....".,...--,e, : - ..-11111K CM'OF TACOMA WATERSHED --....'..7\•'-....--:-....„--,1_:2.,- \-s •': - • e Tv! • .„ F-.• woo .-.. i■•• _ / • WirAiN \ \ • . • , .-. . •- . -1 A. , . . • Or--'' ' .- • • _ lib Ey( ...,)..,.... , . . .. •,._,., ___ ,, • _ . • , L, „ . BAS -, . ii .;',' . .• . • ...„, • ..c., ..... .,... 0 : • ::;.: „•-'')- tz•-• --"(---P-an s N"-•••\„.....er .,.. , -,__ • . - ' .44.:iZa "" -- • 'It. ..„-- , ..•' '•• \ • .: ' • 11, 0 12 3 -4 5 6 7 8 Mlles • •••• . • 'x - ...-s. . . • 1:300,000 L • . . • VIII. O'11 R PERMITS I%. EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN X. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS XL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANUAL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL NO. 3 - CLOSED DETENTION SYSTEMS (PIPES/TANKS) Maintenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected Component Defect Is Needed When Maintenance is Performed • Storage Area Plugged Air Vents One-half of the cross section of a vent is Vents free of debris and sediment. blocked at any point with debris and sediment. Debris and Accumulated sediment depth exceeds All sediment and debris removed from Sediment 10%of the diameter of the storage area storage area. for 1/2 length of storage vault or any point depth exceeds 15%of diameter. Example: 72-inch storage tank would require cleaning when sediment reaches depth of 7 inches for more than 1/2 length of tank. • Joints Between My crack allowing material to be All Joints between tank/pipe sections are Tank/Pipe Section transported into facility. sealed. Tank/Pipe Bent Any part of tank/pipe is bent out of shape Tank/pipe repaired or replaced to design. Out of Shape more than 10%of its design shape. Manhole Cover not in Place Cover is missing or only partially in place. Manhole is closed. Any open manhole requires maintenance. Locking Mechanism cannot be opened by one Mechanism opens with proper tools. Mechanism Not maintenance person with proper tools. Working Bolts into frame have less than 1/2 inch of thread(may not apply to self-locking lids). Cover Difficult to One maintenance person cannot remove Cover can be removed and reinstalled by Remove lid after applying 80 pounds of lift. Intent one maintenance person. is to keep cover from sealing off access to maintenance. Ladder Rungs King County Safety Office and/or Ladder meets design standards and Unsafe • maintenance person judges that ladder is allows maintenance persons safe access. unsafe due to missing rungs, misalignment,rust,or cracks. Catch Basins See"Catch Basins"Standard No.5 See"Catch Basins"Standard No.5 • A-3 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL . 4 - CONTROL STRUCTURE/FLOW RESTRICTOR Maintenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected Component Defect Is Needed When Maintenance Is Performed General Trash and Debris Distance between debris build-up and All trash and debris removed. (Includes bottom of orifice plate Is less than 1-1/2 Sediment) 'feet. Structural Damage Structure is not securely attached to Structure securely attached to wall and manhole wall and outlet pipe structure outlet pipe. should support at least 1,000 pounds of up or down pressure. Structure is not in upright position (allow Structure in correct position. up to 10%from plumb). Connections to outlet pipe are not Connections to outlet pipe are watertight; watertight and show signs of rust. structure repaired or replaced and works as designed. Any holes—other than designed holes— Structure has no holes other than in the structure. designed holes. Cleanout Gate Damaged or Cieanout gate is not watertight or is Gate is watertight and works as designed. Missing missing. Gate cannot be moved up and down by Gate moves up and down easily and is one maihtenance person. watertight. Chain leading to gate is missing or Chain is in place and works as designed. damaged. Gate is rusted over 50%of its surface Gate is repaired or replaced to meet area. design standards. Orifice Plate Damaged or Control device is not working properly Plate is in place and works as designed. Missing due to missing,out of place,or bent orifice plate. Obstructions Any trash,debris,sediment,or vegetation Plate is free of all obstructions and works blocking the plate. as designed. Overflow Pipe Obstructions My trash or debris blocking (or having Pipe is free of all obstructions and works the potential of blocking)the overflow as designed. pipe. Manhole See "Closed Detention Systems"Standard See"Closed Detention Systems"Standard No.3. No.3. Catch Basin See"Catch Basins"Standard No.5. See`Catch Basins"Standard No.5. A-4 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL I ' NO. 5 - CATCH BASINS Maintenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected Component Defect is Needed When Maintenance Is Performed General Trash&Debris Trash or debris of more than 1/2 cubic No trash or debris located immediately in (Includes foot which is located immediately in front front of catch basin opening. Sediment) of the catch basin opening or is blocking capacity of basin by more than 10%. Trash or debris (in the basin)that No trash or debris in the catch basin. exceeds 1/3 the depth from the bottom of basin to invert of the lowest pipe into or out of the basin. Trash or debris in any inlet or outlet pipe Inlet and outlet pipes free of trash or blocking more than 1/3 of its height. debris. Dead animals or vegetation that could No dead animals or vegetation present generate odors that would cause within the catch basin. complaints or dangerous gases (e.g., methane). Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic No condition present which would attract foot in volume. or support the breeding of insects or rodents. Structural Damage Corner of frame extends more than 3/4 Frame is even with curb. to Frame and/or inch past curb face into the street(if • Top Slab applicable). Top slab has holes larger than 2 square Top slab is free of holes and cracks. inches or cracks wider than 1/4 inch (intent is to make sure all material is running into the basin). Frame not sitting flush on top slab,i.e., Frame is sitting flush on top slab. separation of more than 3/4 inch of the frame from the top slab. Cracks in Basin Cracks wider than 1/2 inch and longer Basin replaced or repaired to design Walls/Bottom than 3 feet,any evidence of soil particles standards. entering catch basin through cracks,or maintenance person judges that structure is unsound. Cracks wider than 1/2 inch and longer No cracks more than 1/4 inch wide at the than 1 foot at the joint of any inlet/outlet joint of inlet/outlet pipe. pipe or any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks. Settlement/ Basin has settled more than 1 inch or has Basin replaced or repaired to design Misalignment rotated more than 2 inches out of standards. alignment. Fire Hazard Presence of chemicals such as natural No flammable chemicals present. gas,oil,and gasoline. Vegetation Vegetation growing across and blocking No vegetation blocking opening to basin. more than 10%of the basin opening. Vegetation growing in inlet/outlet pipe No vegetation or root growth present. joints that is more than six inches tall and less than six inches apart. Pollution Nonflammable chemicals of more than No pollution present other than surface 1/2 cubic foot per three feet of basin film. length. A-5 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL `J. 5 - CATCH BASINS (Continued) Maintenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected Component Defect Is Needed When Maintenance Is Performed Catch Basin Cover Cover Not in Place Cover is missing or only partially in place. Catch basin cover is closed. My open catch basin requires maintenance. Locking Mechanism cannot be opened by one Mechanism opens with proper tools. Mechanism Not maintenance person with proper tools. Working Bolts into frame have less than,1/2 inch of thread. Cover Difficult•o One maintenance person cannot remove Cover can be removed by one Remove lid after applying 80 lbs.of lift;intent is maintenance person. keep cover from sealing off access to maintenance. Ladder Ladder Rungs Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, Ladder meets design standards and Unsafe misalignment,rust,cracks,or sharp allows maintenance person sate access. edges. Metal Grates Grate wit.opening wider than 7/8 inch. Grate openings meet design standards. (if applicable) • Trash and Debris Trash and debris that is blocking more Grate free of trash and debris. than 20%of grate surface. Damaged or Grate missing or broken member(s)of Grate is in place and meets design Missing the grate. standards. • • A-6 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL NO. 10 - CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS (Pipes & Ditches) Maintenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected Component Defect Is Needed When Maintenance Is Performed Pipes Sediment&Debris Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% Pipe cleaned of all sediment and debris. of the diameter of the pipe. Vegetation Vegetation that reduces free movement of All vegetation removed so water flows water through pipes. freely through pipes. Damaged Protective coating is damaged;rust is Pipe repaired or replaced. causing more than 50%deterioration to any part of pipe. My dent that decreases the cross section Pipe repaired or replaced. area of pipe by more than 20%. Open Ditches Trash&Debris Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic foot Trash and debris cleared from ditches. per.1,000 square feet of ditch and slopes. Sediment Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% Ditch cleaned/flushed of all sediment and of the design depth. debris so that it matches design. Vegetation Vegetation that reduces free movement of Water flows freely through ditches. water through ditches. Erosion Damage to See"Ponds"Standard No. 1 See"Ponds"Standard No. 1 'Slopes Rock Lining Out of Maintenance person can see native soil Replace rocks to design standard. Place or Missing (If beneath the rock lining. Applicable) Catch Basins See"Catch Basins"Standard No.5 See"Catch Basins"Standard No.5 Debris Barriers See"Debris Barriers"Standard No.6 See"Debris Barriers"Standard No.6 (e.g.,Trash Rack) • • A-11 1/90 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL ). 11 - GROUNDS (Landscaping) Maintenance Conditions When Maintenance Results Expected Component Defect Is Needed When Maintenance Is Performed General Weeds Weeds growing in more than 20%of the Weeds present in less than 5%of the (Nonpoisonous) landscaped area(trees and shrubs only). landscaped area. Safety Hazard Any presence of poison ivy or other No poisonous vegetation present in a poisonous vegetation. landscaped area. Trash or Utter Paper,can,bottles,totalling more than 1 Area clear of litter. cubic foot within a landscaped area(trees and shrubs only)of 1,000 square feet. Trees and Shrubs Damage Umbs or parts of trees or shrubs that are Trees and shrubs with less than 5%of the • • split or broken which affect more than total foliage with split or broken limbs. 25%of the total foliage of the tree or shrub. • Trees or shrubs that have been blown Tree or shrub in place free of injury. down or knocked over. Trees or shrubs which are not adequately Tree or shrub in place and adequately supported or are leaning over,causing supported;remove any dead or diseased • exposure of the roots. trees. • A-12 1/90 APPENDIX A .,„.. , (.00.4t • 4! DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. — CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS • RENTON, WA DECEMBER 1984 • eb+11 i 1 I8(0 • Prepared by: . Edgar T. Jones, P.E. DEI Project No: 81118 • �0 tsk T. ✓p °. e ppC G�fo . 3 7 pee $ Al'. ...") • • 04 .. Aft. • • 'W -4a� . �ao��eQ4. a !Z 5• S¢ • 4205 14BTH AVE. N.E., SUITE 200-BELLEVUE. WA 98007 (206) 885-7877 OR 454-3743 _ - 20B NO. 81 116 i DATE IZ' 19 ' _. DOOOS ENGINEERS. INC. SHE Ell_0F CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING 4205 14871-I AVE. N.E.. SUITE 200 BELLEVUE. WA 98007 ' 'r� I2061 2B3-7877 OR 454-3743 BY --->-o R-v.` I� -.cr tc_. C_a%(...C-t-)C.IN--r(CD C S • • • Its-kT'2491- 0l—Tl�r-3 . 1-v--1`:�Tlt- c:.1Te:_ IS 7.(03 G.C-ES If.. -.1? co. 1•A f2g l .e.. 0 r" '- ":iC)v%o fOlW ST- r A- ' c /o G'Q1C<A•, IA A.-Ti '/r_ a1..<<GI yrs. &A I v5 /- c S.c-►-i D'f 4 'E..6%.4*....C. ?W-•I t vO tv1 ,I a t;: I.J/ Si L..T", 44 tJ vc l N-141 F 1 LA-. IS t-Z,ci--rz.0 Ot,1 1 I _ vtc-i F-sT I�2L4 i P--lo t.a OF-. Zvi-*-- utre.., Str-ICE- % At _o2oI+. i o 17t_I weir.kAor. ffp.r-1 or.. 7}t.Fa, Gi'T,r. o - • t t.a-ro t.I 1 -',rr6 a.-I e---ta- 7- `t:+?T'st�(�--'j ram-{ —Dc y '4. sYS�(Llnn �T— 's•.� �']#�'r �l:}'.4 yT'br—G` ' .0♦• 14-5— -GanenrM. ca,,Stoac b ►-�7 � t. -11.-+X47k ^- S`t'STrr-vA- r -n.}p..+r -Tc Mi-.. X+g..-T'FlLTV-Ai to,'I �-`j;,T'6/.,. CPO 6-17 I-4_ Z0p-1•12 a('.ems TO A brr t ion.k `.i''(`vTi! • i 12rQ . LSD -cv...J\J 6'*'4.J..AGrf.. Sti(4.>T14.w• VUIt't, Pr . ..0 6 e... 1r✓)6Ts'r4,--I Fvfi Ff2`tt"A 1 Nr:; 4�1` �rR-�Lr:✓T Ili 9UUt-i- Th- ��Ir - To .PIe-IL OP of - 1T-r _ wviS To 1%k ►•-kozr4+IISA-sr 5r -A-0L* t,oc..4.4-- BAST S Go 2a-11.4--Ir -P T e.:JTAeg-Y Tb. Suvin PS w I W eft- (g-o V I DAP (t3 ITI4 OV!EZ ry a .e. `'FSTl•t&A g Tit-A-T Pc( e. 4 PfNer O P THe._ 01.1yIr . fr.t.rNtey.6r-tGrL. le;)S AfA•rzT VA-€t-er 01.1 tTS. c,.a/ .6....soLto.T R--.(:: PFke-IL It_Ic,, s >e4\1*. Q(Go POS.-re--C. 1trO(Z S tT 1?r J le r`vA*.4..kT (G✓t.ti p y.K,T. C-Fa t r-4,e-cq c 1M A-tc, t HT, >) • G AGvxv-s i -- _.1.(QS[..--50.70 (0.C34> r/o(0,I >-3 I).--g03 1rorerec r Gj044S E. 1D-I- ' `J/ - �= 9c01(.,. + 's/ O(,c ) 4 kl%,o o/ Z ^IN i2S Vo. Z O, g-C= -.rIL Cam.7C0-5 (a - ) O. per-c r-C._ .� 414,..._.c7......h.•%ter I •- - JOB NO. 5111 S DATE • 12.19 •.54— Q1- DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. 2 CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING SHEET OF 4205 148TH AVE. N.E. SUITE 200 - BELLEVUE,WA 98007 J 12081 BBS-7877 OR 454-3743 BY • G.DtaD mo,.1S 'I•/lpcS• ..r.n►o "'" . ,...,.+., MllYr sew 1127 1 (...•". •ji. ,- . . . . I i. vim' • 11:1-1........imminowasi ..••••• . ti\% . \ . :.. ..• , 1 , s • i•',-. ,_.. . ; .gyp �.; I • • .r' /-\'J•...p�(�7]� I .r • 1 •-• • 11.\ • ."././.•-'.'. .- ..;41- • ...V. . 1;7 ss 1-::.'.... Pr . . . i . Vie, . •. • • 11�� \ I" • x / `fi . :• I w. ' I �I r /MT / ...•' i • ' • • nersrffr ..„,g f� . I' ... i irr ra • I / sJas,�" A I INesrostr'w t ,, . Jk I ees-ws'orer V� • ram. izacv • • WWI I . •-. or 1 ., xa ... .. ...i .„....4. r $ x �..% � ®� ✓\} . •- l• • .••••I4 I Id • •I I t .5...111 ITMPad4? ..1 'Z so—le / r .4. 3uai •�� - 1 .•a ' ,o.rr. , 4 JOB NO. 1fle3 DATE 10' 19'0 — • . . ".4'', OOOOS ENGINEERS, INC. SHEET _ OF CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNIN . 4205 149TH AVE. N.E. SUITE 200 - BELLEVUE. WA 98007 (2061 885-7877 OR 454-3743 BY G D bq _ e)-(- °) 4- .) /z ,_ o .2 tact o t (D4./o 4.l1'rii G0.1r 6K., BV Cr0( OF- 121rtJTOIJ 'Plow- S t1rrc FI.4.t.1 4. Ti-TI4.5 xx / c b - 1,G9 (a`5�� I O & (0. — 4.Z6 (o.I O c›,S Foe- A GJY - R - S� 4 ZSTo- Da'ev►s.l.op►� CvN.IDIT7o1..1 IITiuz �e,l ► t1.11:1 t.rea'Do i4 C ) , a,A,4.).0,,,p. .rL=O,4G-.0 3z= 0.78 CPS :uc e &4.-4..e...) o.7P8 a3cr-s 1.1SE ao- Qa d.G.O <�, 11 0, IZ79 rAUtt, oel IGC �"° 4.-z-G co110 -aJ 1 . / i2, Z E. Q Gerur E. �5 - 5 4- -25 prop - 1Z4,G Mud. soo/// 93Gta V 29.902 Ng!LA-Be (dOS7 ) o.3 of S LiSE z9,c1 • Iz4-s 9 ,pi 124-.5 2 371 - 'ZO t - �oT= 34-u0O. 7 (a:tt)t� t�s _ 217 2 oe1Plces y . 'J 4-2., -Qig rz 2 7Z. eco ►24.s z+-7-5-4,,e) ,... o , ..:-..-,,,,,r,r7, Vfe.sa‘c> :-.: -•. vt..e.At. o ` • Z37Z (lv. I) j4�c roe- Sl z s Ye. /�1;z r- 7 .s 4=5Ce _ 442.14t! G�1 C� 'r441� c�r.onr F.l<_t'. - R4' P�Gi I> roc"I 1. <„,-r Iv\ — • IA c-,e41f, -F-4Poerr '1 Ffr:,i r4ez.e,►u-r'c l t'►e... 1tv ti; -n rAh..Trc D To e,L TF2owv 1 cAAA,64_, To 1p-3 G"^/51 0,0425 w.,./ 10 4Z.3 r`^`-/i,ct., cc:,ejt9iVA.+t\:ltl_..„( h. Py�4•w•PEAR,,1L(VT rA.T-S- OF- 1CC:' vs,ti/iuc \1-IIL:' >r V- C kiea9Si=ve-A w 4lu-4 IS CO<-i Sl ST-re-1•-t i w ITN TNT %-iucl cool-i-r-S <20 1t,5 So e1/41t.'"( Fo e-A '%ct-t o'f 5011, w/ Scw.ti. 4kL4-- w►-t%CA T��Yt.nf•-.TS ?,�v...,,....:-I1l..Y-+1'LA i-f `20'T"v er \.,ta.c„si -1-A-IAi'.1 \0 N.i.-4 ./1t-UGti-• i t I Gt-4 .,C� ,A 2 4 X.9 W t v r. r .r<- c- i- -r -Q,. f'..0._M4: Fti?i=- I LA F--1 I.TZA IIa<--R , 2. 4-1.- G\y- IL__ 1 , /,, l/r,rn s, i \ . 0, I 0 -5 - � JOB NO. e111� DATE IZ• Iq• e"4- DODDS ENGINEERS. INC. BHEET_OF -�'tr,11)d. CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING 4205 148TH AVE. N.E.. SUITE 200 • BELLEVUE. WA 98007 12061 885-7877 OR 454-3743 BY - r -.` ern -v- re)u A to ea.-k I 1--trvt) ao . Q. 0.3,16 _ (771.s-, AC.9 Z� / -2`z5 I�lo i _ -Z on /t-ki,z/ 0..074.7 ` J 2-ezc' _ za2. IZBIis� _ 40(0,0,.4)Clz8.6 - Ig71.(o iz .e�•�, I T� f,ACp = ��1911•co(4. = aI •,C;Ac-,� 1'0te- INFI"utin r)$-A V TAT r� n O tGTO Q2/i-CAE_ 'RA/i'PVC> Zso 7Z"CRP V= 2so(L2/)_ 701o9 frJ 250 VOP.A5 /i e,E1r/E"C- /L /Cr,-//i7vA./ .3( o)((6x9)- %) = /_929 H. 11. von) R4r o S. 42v vei 2-77uG- (�/, F, V= 277( 62"/4) = 5/59fr3. - 36`cenfr I/= 8(3Zr'/-f-) - J`"(o/ar3 /31a/VI'- 72"7 V=/3.(o/(/t%) - /ter 3' 1, 77 VF- 54"nm/ 749 Pr OeI C- o�T�. r 6,,i414e- /l ov/oar) >� /4 954,er3 / //'�� ,/ /(.; 1Y (-,2E(.cp$6 Q�t'/ST t QOFFS/, r - a 4(. €,- s f- e 4G(C=O./OxO.6:0) = O� JOGFS .D/V/G /NTH . ZSC/S E/!u/ GSr: 7'• c6.'41) 5,7' c Gx2/f/c6$ @ 1% = 35 - 3si.syz = - 7Z f7 • ¢(25) 7/vJ,�, 5AY 2��/I-76-r_r, ,'Z77117;7 3,7z) • r • 00A/CE0 of =/2 /4(75) _ /8.� ,>7. 7' / % 95 JOB NO. U! I DATE 12 . 19 .84- � . DODDS ENGINEERS. INC. SHEET -- OF-- CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING �� 4205 140TH AVE. N.E. SUITE 200 • BELLEVUE. WA 98007 BY 12061 885-7977 OR 454-3743 O►�L51re_ `:7Tof2v.A_ 6.0KvS Rs,►.a A L(�1.0.1-l�a�.1S ,/c.V CL.OfTri3> rtyY�/ \b 1"s2- .\T -1K,„ vV tVL/ G„ = ��rZ-E' Cal I (% pc7 a) LL I Foe- `a dT41,nb.Tfe-U to-y 0 tk trn� Cad i2,2 �j/ti/GG OVEdFGow OGcves K/NEA/ DETEi/Tian/45Y.Srem is FULL & "CT/VE//&4.c row 4-3`- — 1E5'Giv1 e wtu. 6E 1-laAo v3A-rv.- OF 5.94- t T-.. � p�y,�Ft,ovJ 43 /vb • 0.2t_ (44/ /3 roe. vt6t. Ote•• Lb 2 V\l O.OZ4- ( _ C J > �::7!►t� /5 • ZZc,es - o.S A C- = 2,1 n.,eE s (of50 _ o !.(06 I,mB 3.30 fo = (0 ,.-� L = 1 (z. 2Xrc-Fc. 12" Gm(' LJ 3!0 :ham o.Oz4- Q = 3. 4�FS > 2. 2Lr'-S 0.1c . IT PSsl-ego F0 � 0p(-plai4 PI t, 4L Q OY.- c;:,uucf 5y '�1� I I0 Gt{ Gcb y:- G�� O 8o AGv = 2 .0 c„e.c; c_o. ��= l,,q�q Ii 7 g,2 roe_ . / (Z_ 1 -(Z.0)- 2 CP 5 ircA t` e 11.00 Int o.oz4 .� C� = 1�.��c.F s � JOB NO. gk ,I g DATE ' 11 • ga" DODDS ENGINEERS. INC. (p CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING 8HEET OF 4205 149TH AVE. KE. SUITE 200 - BELLEVUE. WA 90007 '�� (2061 683-7977 OR 454-3743 BY GE, 10 14 - - NL-tl, SLo _ (3(o3.0 -355,1 f38/n-i�/ /i�5 .z 0I D'Z? - Foe I2" C ? ,-727a.p-oh Q— 3, 2 s > 2. f38ci l-r ��.� r �e�v�l�; OPs �a�.- Pt(76• stl-tc;r- +4-6IL st_ ?2.7z 63�r- lse- ro Co,,.t *s•?. C a�i i r 1717-p.%%-ta-4- MA-P `1-: I A/ + AL= 15.(0 (I.lo A� u�¢e n.-� ram,o�,� ro �.�...,...� sa...APt_r 1 c- C%sri< VCIHI C. *r st.—t I � , � yes 'e,I o t- t 3°CY01 .7Z ((10 Zv KAI". Pt"" c-r"°.f *1 %. i. rol-e•Sr& ¢,b7p Q 13.E xis xI.l = -7.se-ps I. e IS" LwiP GJ =1 5% Qf„w= 7.& LF i 7.5 G<<- . L.5 AZ r0 C�) _ A, +dam-f Pos.916(.� Iakz- -To Q�rC:►.k A.,E tXr .,.iaoo-► s Ac, =(131�0 4-gl?> , _ • 51-zb,I It. 2O w+I r—t Q ll.l05(1.6= IZ.i�Gi (1Stt 24-"CAAP 2 S= .O &/0 IZ,cJcr`' - JOB NO. 4:Viisei DATE . I Z ' Iq ' 64- C • DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. gHEET OF CIVIL E N G I N E E R I N G SURVEYING P L A N N I N G 4205 148T1-1 AVE. N.E.. SUITE 200 • BELLEVUE. WA 98007 giJ (208( 885-7877 OR 454-3743 BY • • oPFSIT . .51�.1 MM Ap S G4i.a. s 1"=2cc,' 'a./ 1 I p--- — 11 1 '^` • U �-'1W--- —lei X — — Ojf4L 11 ( I-- — x _, .. ...,_ N Q, )1 2.. , , 1 lr TR ..rt. 'I I 111❑ I I ❑ T X oI II x L ❑ 1 1 1 I �,c I I 1rA I I1 �� IN 11 o i1Oal="DEPI ' � 1� I1Id❑ ` I 1 ,� / 1411 _ ---- -J 400 ------ 1 - . -ME.--- - / ` - 1 `` -t-` ._ ' • --- r - ;385 - or'"amwo , „. `-W 1399 I /' I Mr° * -1111 i 4 f 0 ' II i- 1I o, , hwaviii „ .-gt* I/ --- ,..• 0 x t, ,.c,(...- it • .°0 .ir , 1 = ),,, �fi�rl�i � 1 0 tip�• 1 1 w • ttr •z � • - , .. , , TREES li '� el :! RE 4 .. iip I f 8 4 El I I 1 1 • ,. ,iii!,,, cp. . .,,,__ , ,..__ .,.A, '`"\k, ,! • . ... , 14 '1 4 4111, it , C31; J ( 0 ' - ' 1, ir: ..... aes" 004#10 01114ilik . // 0 411 1 I' IS te ._ : • , •Kk4. ....:.." .404 • .. // % i I , • I` ♦ • 1 i . Alki .—.-4. *Ir .---,m.o. .'ONION* . . 1 / -- - i 1 kii;1;I 'A�,. 1 ( ( TREE • : I 1 p- TREES a358 i III4 VS/4k 1 • IA . i II ) ki? Aar)I -- II 1! 3 f 1) }_t� t _ 1i 1 / I 1 II\ �" I r' `, ! 1 F11 1E \\ E( EI Ii1 iI 1, D, � • 1 IX 92 I �'' il' ; i o ° ' 1 `I I 1 . .-at Orr, .r •• 1 Eli!?) , . 0. egolo 9I � i + 402 1:1 55KV -----_ � ' 1 3 5 5 5 K V r • , 1 DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. JOB NO. 011I8 CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING DATE E - 5 • SC- 4205 148TH AVE. N.E., SUITE 200 - BELLEVUE. WA 98007 B YG (206( 8B5-7B77 OR 454-3743 askoo-s/J�s( Y "TAi io COt-r112o CAN.t _c_Ul i(ati4s C/v7-2/2 - w/46, , 0/.416-4.7 v /A.4EVT 60 /7Gon/4? 764 fc/6157— to Ac.��:s �i. 7Z,1,2',6 c JT174W. 76,.t'X G?S/N� �C ¢36-6,O,T ,9G /5/7YQ fr 3 6Ti'4z)4G" f-9i0J//e6-..6 �. 24' Feee.sae.eo --� 3 7 3s( r�o vr� X- 6,70,,/ 1/01-= 275(¢XZ¢)A t Z ( 77(¢) _ /3 ?be.�r A/OTC CHE C/ a#:/ii/,S !�N✓] /G�", 6 -'CE ,c J.r.�rG-"�`' I.V/c- ��C` At�O CU TO Dfj'o s/7704/ Dr= S�/J/ii/67 Jr SHEET OF - GOLDER ASSOCIATES DATE 4104 148th Avenue NE /0-12 - g I e 3- IcX'€3 Redmond,Washington 98052 PROJECT LOCATION(206)883 0777 V-EA)__.j i4 AA TO CONTRACTOROWNER WEATHER TEMP. °at AM �JnIn2� - J'-z cI °at3=.c�-7 PM PRESENT AT SITE eoy S«t c F ( 4,--067 ) M rl,. THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: 4C PM - Orl S t'TE . 1`A'/te- t- j S At FED f* CT,0n) • S r r ). APP 2vX, 3 To � 0t- G20SIken E44.4JF_!: tfi 'S �4✓1=�1 pLI' (Elt 0J EC 'fill- CeM PA-c'r-E- SF)t C- .. .S`aAFn M c-.4ucTL. yt J A ' I A A As 4'A-D E4 c_q -,r .F'AI ot)6r, r#' F H CD,"FA-G?C4 Sty, L �USi- (.i1�1nt��' w�� PE FOn�-nit cc LAV /l Ut t A DE:01.5aM F; , cEc- /t v 1413411 a. -ag?K/S �ATEr•tit . �N MAx. Dev Deaser','t9ren r,ts-c- Y I)6n)S[S o 0 'Sa,rat op-7 Soon, 5.414 a W 4 E 64ri,L 7ii LF S/'-T Y �o Act STtI/C ,� �s1 P/t4 its ry ice-OW. 0-0/10 IizPcp•Q 9.56% A+o,sracc t I6.q- I3o'ss.-r* op Trt�5c J 4 .S ;Cr flbp S'�.a E0,49 • 4., (Zo. g Re • 99_O Zv'tJdGTrf dFTI;R, .50474 fNJEroAtcp SA/✓1J,-T .514% tiGE ifyoJ.VER,e,4Pd /o3 6P4Ft? /a-%:At0/STiKF /0.. 3 /3. 4 98- o ,D• HOFr?E At 7-rt S.?..ip-sew 6-6evEL' LrvcLFS, . 7 ryCE tf-YO•/ /O• gov L /2 Z PFF g.S '! itl a 5714r--C. 1 ZO, ( 6.' '50t rit OP -roc,vc1 r t 5ft-pry S440 -5o n�- 6e.4✓6 L g /2-/ PP p Q /o' Av,rrwer /1 3 8.l . 9.S'. 3 o•Akr:it r,'nbr-rd- • ES.x__ of TESi S G - -- 6rvEn/ Td ' Nox T.�Errycc itr/in1 G /� 1' I pM - OFF S l T2r )PIES TO IiamTr1 REPORT . r=* . 4 kNo. 'g6-13- in n6') Field Engineer r•Sca� Date /° "/Z- 'V Project GCc.j,J r Pc*ire- Weather Pkt,s4- SE,rtiwy Sheet -/ of Test Number DI - I Zo1 1o1z02 lobo_ loizoQ- oito :o•'rnc _ �S 'S I3c'5 Zc.fJ 9v. -5 ,o'So.rr L-�4j :54 .r S�J�✓ �f-';'t'% AJLV'0 Fite 1ftit/.Jt - rt s ��1. �..► .(Yr Test v.c rc r- ?-fU':•..►. s Location Hvr�r.rJ i�y1!_c.�' t•64-:T is ci rr -Ca AD E'cA., SV , L• JeK.,.( you—s:/Q i&'Ao( JV.bafND1 Elevation CQN9 Gs' '.' 4 t 1 �lc�r'., Cohnr) .-4-f'G N& ." /Jt'e Noy P. oc�,_,., pore �V^ Al N t Mode >; Depth 10: S'' icy' lZ`• , Field . ' • . Density Count plc f , 1.4?4- , lS42_, I Ef^ 6E3,O4r2O • • Field . s. Moisture'Count C iz - PIA. , CI gc, 01? c GI ZQ in i z+ •, - Wet Density (pcf) IZc.0 I3I.0 11�.' ITD I t24.3- (Z.c.Z .• . Dry Density (pcf) 1x6..e" \ZC`.c'' ICr•? )Zo. i 1/S. i .z Moisture 96 .... g. 13.6 $•3 e. 1 7•f? Material Tested LT%c€ s rz_r ' %��'� Svt'kc —�? ix. S,tT S't-c 6crlr` . i Max. Proctor Density (pcf) 1Z7 'ZZ • 1 IZZ (L , IZ I Opt. Moisture S i % . 9.s * C IVZ to /. 96 Compaction 9C•57 99.o ` •'.0 9S 3 96.0 96 Required 9 - 9 5" c; c) 5- 9r . • Standard Count: Density 29 S" Troxler Model 341113 Moisture 0 ? 14 Serial No. eH 1 P . Figure *)CLEAR FIELD DENSITY/MOISTURE TEST DATA - /Vy.c1 ^riin-C'r..1 /-iE;7 o.3•Jc A d fa C WRr� Associates i0-/2-8? t..1., 6-5A......r�r .icy. _ �= DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING November 4, 1987 DEI Project No. 81118 Mr. Don Monaghan, P.E. Department of Public Works City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Crown Pointe Dear Don: Attached are the original asbuilts for the storm drainage system at Crown Pointe. The profiles were redrafted to indicate significant changes in grade. The inspector for the project asked that you review the following remaining items that require resolution prior to temporary occupancy and address each as to their outcome. The contractor has raised the grade around CB 8 to provide 2 feet minimum cover for the storm drain pipe. Note that CB 5a indicates 1.04 feet cover for the 12inch storm drain. The asbuilt of the 16 inch petroleum line crossing indi- cates a top elevation of 372.01. The storm drain in this vicinity was raised to provide 1.5 feet minimum separation between the two pipes. CB 5b indicates 1.03 feet cover for the 12 inch storm drain. How- ever, due to the finished grade.-rising to CB 5 and the storm drain sloping downward, 2 feet of cover exists 10 feet away from CB 5b. Thus only 10 feet of pipe has cover ranging from 1 foot to 2 feet. CB 4a indicates 1.67 feet cover for the 12 inch storm drain. However, as in the case for CB 5b, only 10 feet of pipe has cover ranging from 1.67 feet to 2 feet. Regarding Queen Avenue, the 8 inch storm pipe has 0.93 feet of cover at inlet 1 and 2.01 feet of cover at CB 1. Note that the approved design called for 1.83 feet of cover at inlet 1. We understand that the City of Renton has a requirement of 2 feet of cover for storm drain pipe. We are requesting a variance from this requirement for the instances and reasons stated above and based on the attached manufacturer's fill height recommendation chart for the pipe supplied for the project. As the chart shows, Mr. Don Monaghan Page 2 November 4, 1987 minimum fill height is 6 inches for 8 inch pipe and 8 inches for 12 inch pipe for AASHO-H20 highway loading. All of the above instances exceed this recommendation by at least 150%. Therefore, since the storm drain pipes are structurally sound for all of the above instances, we see no reason for reconstructing them to a greater depth. The as-builts also indicate a riser elevation of 358.93. This results in a water surface elevation 0.40 feet lower than the top of the 72 inch pipe at CB 9 and 0.50 feet lower than the top of the 60 inch pipe at CB 10. As shown-by the attached calculations, the total loss of storage to the system is 64.5 cubic feet. However, 484 cubic feet of excess storage :was provided by design, thus resulting in a net excess storage of 419.5 cubic feet provided. . The storm drainage hold harmless agreement was executed and recorded prior to building permit issuance. For your reference, the recording number is 8610311892, recorded Oct. 31, 1986. Please notify me as soon as possible regarding resolution of the above matters, as the owners are anxious to obtain their temporary certificates of occupancy. You may contact me at 454-3743. • Sincerely, Dodds Engineers, Inc. J- E' . . r + 'ones, P.E. . • 'ect Engineer cc:Gary Keeley, Centron • FILL HEIGHT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ALUMINUM ALLOY CORRUGATED CULVERT • Loading: AASHO-H20 Highway Shape: 23" x bh" Date:July, 1961. Minimum (a) Maximum Recommended Fill Height Culvert Diameter Recommended For Gauges and Thicknesses (Feet) (Inches) Type of Shape Cover (Inches) 16 14 12 10 8 0.060" 0.075" 0.015" • 0.135" 1.640" • 8 Full Circle - 6 50 10 Full Circle : 7 40 12 Full Circle 8 35 40 50 15 Full Circle 8 32 35 40 18 Full Circle 8 26 30 35 21 Full Circle 9 21 25 30 30 24 Full Circle • 9 13 211 259 30 30 Full Circle 9 .5% Vertically Elognated 9 24 30 35 36 Full Circle 10 10 18 25 30 5% Vertically Elongated 10 21 30 35 42 Full Circle 12 18 20 25 5% Vertically Elongated 12 20 25 30 5% Field Strutted (b) 12 30 35 40 48 Full Circle 15 15 20 25 5% Vertically Elongated 15 18 25 30 5% Field Strutted (b) 15 30 35 40 54 Full Circle 15 15 20 25 5% Vertically Elongated 15 18 22 30 5% Field Strutted (b) 15 25 30 35 60 Full Circle 18 14 18 5% Vertically Elongated 18 17 25 5% Fied Strutted (b) 18 25 30 66 Full Circle• 21 13 17 5% Vertically Elongated 21 15 20 5% Field Strutted (b) 21 • 25 30 • 72 Full Circle' 24 12 15 5% Field strutted (b) 24 20 25 78 5% Field Strutted (b) 24 16 20 84 5% Field Strutted (b) 24 15 96 5% Field Strutted (b) 24 10 • NOTE:Values above are for 85% or greater compaction. (a) For the special case of heavy construction wheeled vehicles use 2 feet cover • • to 36"diameter and 2/3 of the diameter at greater than 38"diameter. (b) Field Strutting is defined as shaping pipe elliptically by wire or timber strutting or careful,thorough compaction of backfill around pipe during Installation. • O IE . � CIVIL D ENDGI SNEEREINN G G SUNRVEEYINRG S,PLAINNNINC J O B NO. 6/#DATE fi"•4•29 4205 1413TH AVE. N.E.. SUITE 200 - BELLEVUE. WA 98007 B Y ETA/ (2OS) 885-7977 OR 454-3743 • Z f/.44 ,� 2 r�,el77c-701/ C•¢GCUCf}T1OAJ D.e 04.$- e)J/ 7-- v 7 '7. ;CIS -6a/1-r- dui, ,cv go-,93 • on 7Z"cmee C8 9 3v% e3 pia. aie G ' ecipmvap CBio ,3 S9, 4� CjiGG1)4 9T2r Goss of 7r3r47 GE:745 D.c 4e_ hoc. SroQ+Q4e Los- lave ro "ee dpy% p_- Xifpehf" • f Ot+\ Mbht 044,, Cf+t02'r' Co Foe 72" 9 3% ce i .,a.e IS o ay 3610 :. got. Lost 0 73 (aeEA y {ao3)62-r}(&�) oz.(o r'r3 4- / ° a (s BYS� C� q0 flo of Vl�°r- , � ��v r� i• Vol. l.ocDT = y3 (Um:4) )()Ze `T I. I pr3 -1."0104 G►!i ter -ry 4js-riv",‘ =ZZ,cO 1- 41.9 = 6,4 ,s 3 Vs-I vl= I4-19�- 1r3 (066 SWO.061e)— 14-r47o r i (ee 4Y�4 K3 i xc-ess ,was 'vouM5-D. -rpos 464 64.,5er-3 419,Sb FT3 s:xc >5 51-1w sr5 I►J -1 -s- SYSr rH.. SHEET I rip A • ENGINEERS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING ems' STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS • • CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS RENTON, WA DECEMBER 1984 eF>J ISED A — i'3% Prepared by: Edgar T. Jones, P.E. DEI Project No: 81118 .</.7."Z*44cmpor- if/( 1&° ° d' • • 12• Ig• 8¢ 4205 148TH AVE. N.E., SUITE 200-BELLEVUE. WA 88007 [206] 885-7877 OR 454-3743 :os No.• 0, 1116 'DATE 12 19 •0 +• OODOS ENGINEERS, INC. a- CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING SHEET_I_OF 4205 148TH AVE. N.E. SUITE 200 - BELLEVUE. WA 98007 • T I, 12081 BSS-7877 OR 454-3743 BY 4t' lk- Cam.• tJ-rr-oDOCTL01-1 : �fff.„ >cxa�n �,rrt� IS 7.GSAczws If.! SIB CoK4 ere Is. ti �c ayo •c0-re5T :# ti• Sc'% G1¢Ps. 1.1 Q.TI V -L I1 e. • I "err_ 4P-�V rA, A4 i bo .+i 0 k)/ Si 4.T. IJ f-)4 tbn Nal Ft u, tS c.oC Al 1'-O otU `fl+- a-sr Ll ( 'r y10 j A.e-oo--on Jci To lootk..4 moa...tAue..JIH'w o- -Iwic- c_ -r r op Rists,-ro Vest Fr.kv. G WIvs Q� /7. i1 n ' �.0 1 iF - ' r . �',j w�Fl.n lti.-b� �.yj i►r�'{4'1� 1 .t%ie,-rww. ca�� , Die..-Teki TI0Kt •b•f'..r . I S 2rzcLiN. `Eo1O oi4 A 5 YQ t rzs--Y9- • d, •c.oc.tvrr`A s'Cs-rt \iv IA, A-t�.o 60„ 1 e-rr�.t og„cb r--Qvrn N 4'°�'` erg' "f-1-ee u kk -111 t- str- To •FIc-K_ op orr-s I rtk_ v t.fa w S To i-'k t tperN-\tF...Pcb4-.. �J r A.-Iit.,_ t,o(.o.L- 'BArS t• ►.L S Gv I -I fl...,`t 1124 P L)T Z ( Tb 'buwA.PS W I L' ea- f' V I PE() fi•�1 114 dv TcI-a-r Age, At., PAPS p. Tom. D t.t h1 re GonAv VeAtirme-e., lojg P Olderwt T"' Ott ors w/ ASsoc..tor o Paet_u..-Icq S pwvl<s Ate- Pep Pos.R.O 1S9t2 stry 'Dre Jtr-t-eprm E.x 1tr1 �12Pt t riIP,G- GoN 0 I'T1• c��►5 ( re.- 0K tom, pe4*-tt-J.^..c.4 s- tMits.tP c FI-T -71') • AGExth'r = ?I(12S1:- o% (o,05-) 'r C7f2cr(o,I5>� = O7(o3 Fo,G«,r Goso o, 5,f2- - 0,7Co 3 (0. >= o, co,0- . ' JOB NO. el l i s DATE 1s.19 . �aa, DODOS ENGINEERS. INC. SHEET 20F CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING 4205 148TH AVE. N.E. SUITE 200 • BELLEVUE,WA 98007 V-77 1 1208I 305-7877 OR 454-3743 BY . rf"74..k4 31- 1:14=tet1 41� COW I Tiot.1 S 1.AA1/4S� :::��'.. .. �.�f • ATE, I\k * IA ak i.Lilt Is I. ..., b 1 1. -°-'' . '' - .w- 4• -'I I 5 l;—---P—-7-I 3 I•4-% Iliimi .1 .mi ..1 ..Hiu....4ftllIlmtli7.•i•'........... ...,..,,_,•••• V 0 if\%,. • • . •• 4° '/_____`..--7 . . , 4, 0°/:,,... ---,3,---/- . .....r • or s - .,.. ; • /64.`'9-9 1 ... • ,/ of. t( i,:.::::.er T! . '. .. . . . • .._N... (i, •. . 2 ........ . • . .. .1 ce i. 1...... . i 1.: z / ., . 7- ,...... e....,....,:•.• .... 1 „.... .1 • - ...., • • -6= • . , . • . L.- iift • • .. . .• .. i . I f . I. • Mit , 1 w,....k....... . 111 , 1 • / ssa (� I - . \ ,aaargr'w4.11 • IL. aer.�+e cm'r . u° cross • : : . , _ ••• • •,, I i ~a x mar ,a 1 • I Jfl". . .. • Ilii r-' • • roUwdu.n f1r ' 41r1 i/'r`I lw o\ rwal-L . s 513+-N S- 6 1,i-v-1 153 c si eves+t..L tte,Iki r-n Jr1 5-u.µog /CM "105 S.a O5 S'>> 5,1..r 4007 19r1171. ISrGJ GI fi17I or\ ►^►"iSa+ l7 g :-v rt\ 41 -1'd21 1.1-)n rir v3► 'Ad 'S/ )'-1 a 1•+-i-"rn Z r+77 ' S 1 AIM-01, a 1-rr tca-ra W?e3e �4J ^ J-2 0J . '114 }a- - s2 f g-off -oL-i 'i (0 '67)2L42 'W ate sixus 2 = ) 2 =47Y3 p . s'-7z 1 G Q 7< -( € )o + -1.obPf - s02 ti sWI4120 Z Z LS z s+2I bLZI' 6' s-t'21 b'62 - 'aST1 s�� •o 1SCr 39 rn1 zI,6'6aa {72l - Nam$/{' •S2• _�I find S' b 3av ,a b�.1 ' 97 1`1 i•-•au ol'oi 0)'1'17 47V3 77I fl O '1'1fW 1L21 'O t. 'o - _ .� ;°� 3SP S47So< cIN""Tt9 37r+i� s4'.2 `aL 0 =zSo4-dX o= mod,eler2 (crxr1441. ems) 1-4ot1.rallI��I% htr+rl ,LL'n rralso ry 7 gib/:-r-1Avid. -ak -3 0 - A ' '1 01' ? ')217 = �l'o� �"o .t Cgs'o)s4)'( -�-y �us>r N41131-15 VVar ,' 1 S 4714C>s �1 b-3re, g'p _ - Na4. '3_1.real M" 1 mr.2-a- • r1 2(1r41-"' _ eta EPLC-PCP dO LLBL•CBB IBOMI LOOBB VM '311A31'13B - OOM 311115 -37,1 '3AV HJBPI COMP d0 133H8 �JNINNVId �JNIA3Atl11s ONId3 N1�JN3 11A13 '0N1 'SEl3BNISNS S0000 elte.;e. �g,(ol ,2 31V0 oil le 'ON 8O' • - • ' - Job NO. a1 II) DATE IS' 19• - 4r- DOORS ENGINEERS. INC. SHEET_4 CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING !) 4203 149TM AVE. N.E.. SUITE 200 - BELLEVUE. WA 98007 �� (2081 883-7877 OR 454-3743 BY 't r c. .I V-Are/VI 'ram I. ao s. Q. - o,0,74_5 Acv 4,2c i5 -2'z 4- i-752, -2 . 74,v = )243. 8 V r- zszo-r ,--_ os - I Z818, _ 40/0.0-14s XIL6.6 = 19 77' V - f,ACp = 19 17.(e(4.w>= 5 4-25 pi- . `� (►� -r • e-- 1NFi1.1e45.n0I % TO-ii r.FCtetz Sh S i ST4k24.e"E., Cent'tteo 4 — *-7-re M T100.t ‘"Me- -CAS ' KO+/t j7kt> g. 250 — 7z"CRP V= 2 p( 2/)_ 7o49m- 2s0 4A.- V0/0I5 /•i4/4i/EG /.t/F/G7. Twv,41 j/13( oAx9)-67%) = /92 9 pr 3 GF_ a Vac.Rgno ' 42o✓Ec As¢6-q 277 P V r 277( 62/V4-) = 5139 F73 b4 - 36*cn'', V= 0( ? -) - 54,FT3 /3i0/VF- 72"/71/ V=/3,602t/4) = 385ictI 1, 77 VF- 54a/mil 1/= 4.77(4•5t7Y4-) _ 7l'Pr OI?trt c.� G�,7t-L,F�r � �� 2o►/ro�� /¢ 954�T �� > /49'10� €4 . qR6 5E = Qa-is7- t Q49.4c:S/ = O.46 Cs t 4a6,44 0=a/o)(04,0). o,sods A/V/ /, /CE.$ GYM= .. ZS GFS_G.9c,I'/. 411C 4:we. +1) SPACE pe/fice 5 e %z = 35/- R54 %. = 3, 72 Fr, "ele ekezeve&a.; ,d, --, /e/5-4 ---4 _..: /0 ,&,Z7r 2(rt.z)(3.70 ¢�ZS� 3 i. Fo/e 00/4/cE Z• _/2 .�z7i, _ /83 ,h. 'r / ,/z( Z)(7 ) . . • (27‘e • --A-111 14-2 e74. rAY 82 ;. 2 •?/ —( / • s"› •-72-g- "-5 s•-• , s-2 2c)ate 7l f (zAd ". • 709 )1 • cr• re)/ (— • \•••(</_7 --, /763 ( --)p 2 7k-D-1± 1w -eno s /4" (- 0/ — - OA' y - ‘• • 2 ( cZ '5'17 -7i 7 Z2 „ 2 I • / 2 7 2 -7 h 0 . 2 Z. g'25; 7 c."c -2 c/5 7 (.'J o 0/ /7 •c-• 7 .0 • 2 6 //, S / 5-6 (-5-e- 0 2,2 • 0-2 7 b 01 2• • • -/-a•./1 g 7 2 •65 24-- bor 0 73-01 c-74 s r 75'D Js 22 71- A ' /(9-) -® e_ DODDS ENGINEERS, . INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING December 9, 1987 DEI Project No. 81118 is Mr. Don Monaghan Department of Public Works City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South .DEC 9 1987 Renton, Washington 98055 D'Ir'!XFIR.!t Re: Crown Pointe Apartments ;, Cis\ Ua:l;1i` o Dear Don: Attached are the offsite storm drainage basin topography map and a proposed profile for the extension of a storm drain east within the A3 basin for the referenced project. As indicated by the profile, the current elevation of the storm drain stub from catch basin #8 is low enough to serve the property to the east. Therefore, there is no substantial advantage to lowering the existing stubout by one foot. I have also calculated additional storage for the detention system by utilizing the smaller conveyance piping, which should compensate for the proposed reduction below. If the riser is adjusted by 4 inches, thus leaving 6 inches of clearance from the underside. of catch basin #4''s top slab, then only 6 cubic feet is potentially lost. This is less than 0.1 percent of the required storage; therefore, the :top slab of catch basin #4 would not have.:to be adjusted by 1 foot. Otherwise, a difficult grading situation would result within the vicinity of this catch basin. Please review these requested modifications to the final punch list and notify me or Gary Keeley at Centron of your decision. You may contact me at 885-7877 if you have any questions. Sincerely, DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. E r Jones, P.E. Project Engineer ETJ/jct • Enclosure cc: Gary Keeley • 4205 148TH AVE_ N.E.. SUITE 200-BELLEVUE. WA 98007 f2081 985-7877 OR 4.5-i4-:-R749 DODDS ENGINEE-RS, INC. JOB NO. (//// CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING DATE `0•4•67 4205 1413TH A(V0E1 8 5 7877 OR 454-3743 UE, WA 98007 2 B Y e r� . Iz• 8'87 AS-&)u . 7 �Td gee- /�li E- d�°t/ G9.LGS, /9A0i77 ) 1 v-To,2/9*r. 'fir3, /2 " ,o//" " • ce ¢ 7 2 Ga 5 -. Z 8'.ge- /2'eG"i1P /i. ,'vw W*''.v 06-7 • 7c v /0 7b ( l/ - .3 ��r✓ 67-0,e44e• = 3/ (%¢)= 2¢ S 4),e . v - c L e4t cU69714P(✓ o•G.:.G��'.:c5ry fie- CII/a" 7 ' 2"c ok J ov• •� 4,3 -�'vr�r or/ . uu� 3 8..93 W//e J god°lino eY¢„oYerf4 )fit.=. 359,2(0 rim G (O "Crliet3' cB/o .... .349, 43 • -e()I , toss OF xSP Ge?V ors 4g I 427.1' VOL. 57-0 29GE./,osr ave iv PIPE, ,2. 12 Ivor FiasA/l Fuu • — : 01 •39.f� . • . r' • f'eo►A k..� /NM-WM. cFis,2x- (o `. • Foe 72$I 99% :Writ:,ae fv is 2Eo04.-50 ay '1% \lot. Li" _ 113 Osozeo. eft-o)(..LE-*ic,-'�+� z y4,54c71)( �rr)(I4) = 1.3 Pr. 3 4 J • 1 7 &7 q(o% c` °T#) ,a rS P�1vc cD B7 Z% /. blot. = 4 4 0 Pr3. ib v11:42.46,c�0 Lo4r - ?? Ssrs-rtw\ = 13 1- 9-.'5 = �.Q0 rr 3 • w 5vE;e , ,9 r43(au, srve>icIe)- 14-470 r-73(eeab sr i _ 4 pr3 r xc.-e5s ie- tvAs Atit-I5D. TIR7S 484 14- (p 4?2 , r-t 3 s-xc es s srs 1 I opt DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. JOB NO. e)/ it CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING DATE (Z • •g 7 4205 148TH AVE. N.B. SUITE 200 - BELLEVUE, WA 98007 .� (2061 885-7877 OR 454-3743 B Y -� C.4r-G✓6„4-r7/,- i r/� 4 /yOlGX 77f/T r -�R ref /3 // /=f'i1✓r'r i✓ WV/G.1/ .>7-4n`-/cc Ta G.o4-41✓ (0, ,z :/✓ -u J 4.A10 rfM ff 7f/47' de)/2 "rut yo ,9 LEA r »�✓� / ,9, //V co /0cJG/ 7Z7 ,C/rt/G/ Lo/rvr y r. Grty yeG "Are- Fv2 7WS ESNs/iv lr1/0.dc,o � �-�� G,il/ O.c'�.lG NTH v70,2446. �r�//I/G/ �lD G/IJEO:, C2 G f 3/= 3.7,FG. TAWS 06=cS/G)/t/ 77'/S ,G'/>L;-/,v , ; G = O.5 (Co,/0.f_0577/:f'L y Ol/� GSr/irl s�i�0� /61/0-1,.i ( = G = /Co /h�r K.gi/ran/ Cap/6.. • „ . = (o45)(4 ed D, ¢B CeS L/SE /2 o,024e ; S=o,a0SH1/A/ f2i ,2/a rgo,4./L E 0/�-wire E)(r v 'a#t' i' i4 /yvonG; osow,v IOfA//-E 7 I4-n/ G/7 71C .,2& 17b/'J v,97-1.41., �, k-P s 1"-5' / . 4teL sr-oA.,E 1"c.100I - 395 -----7----- 3/ / 1 Ge&i / • Poi ore / / 390 - I �/ •- 390 6�ff �2 o.Svl 3B 3e .9co (ce..... Pr. ar►s-s) 350 1--1 C CT „c -_SOB NO. 8rn8. • • .dATE 12• 161 • 3f C Dlx SO D D SIL E! ENGINEERS,RING v N INC.G V �NG 8HEET 7 OF 4205 148TM AVE. N.E. SUITE 200 • BELLEVUE, WA 58007 � / 12081 BBS-7877 OR 454-3743 BY c./ ` oFFSITE •e26•.SA+.1 MAP Nseat.,t,: 1II.....Zc' _ • _-__,) I‘..au___ ___J k..__ 0 j I t, ' 5 1 EN-g - 1 1 el." ;di= i ❑ ; � : .■ aI ■ off ;+.� t■ I ❑t #11 I 0 � plt ❑ ` ' ' • a'id EI I I ■� ; ; II lg. 0111 Ups I o o d `� ' -I 1 �''' ----- i .�._ � 1 !� ---� --� boo .-----• - -- --mL---- - x - - = -u�- ''" _. . . . • "ilk* 399 t1 vpp J.,+ f I Niiiiiiroi. vi il. copt e a II vo '' 41411Ir 1 I aleil . L . = '' 0: 1 • '''.:koa3 0: V • li y„Aril.,s.. iiP 4,, .tt1�b (�I I W Q. TREES 1" .� rel.t :. 3 REE' ,/ 0f.8 • 4 El i �a �/ i sii \off;' , �d�_—_1` �, k.' . . ,,, , 44.* 4.* A : 4 14111e I: • 0 - •4 nir 7. ,A 10A0,•01-41/4 if�395. )t. ...-. II "� I,j„ ' "hi --- -_--..---::-1 a) AIWA 0 ,,;.- . ; . 1 LI ipo , .\ • , i i Ak. -..ill- -At 2 11111 1 / .:: ; I. . .4, lb 1 \ . 1 f • j TREES b 3S8 •,:7011111t. 4011111. .9. ' ! I\ =_/011 -'-=-, 1 . _, -, ,, _ li3 1 • _J I I 0,00A 1 11,: : II a . IMErsii/i. ' ' -•• 111$t*---I-I-- - 4.--- d-1! , , .y' .A TRESS' I ! 02 i 4 • i. x J. 4 -' Iilit .1, - • ri • oo oI I . r Ill.I ....e \tj. Fio =,, 70 . 0.....i . I 2 /�, I.I 55Kv • _ 4 l . ti: . 351..-.._ I x 376 • r: _: ,__. • _ k _r- - '--AliFFk416 - I 3 5-5 55KV . f ; / I e 1i E CMI/�s' GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING'STUDI', - • PROPOSED SHOPPING MALI: NE 4TH STREET AND;UNION AVENUE NE.' RENTON,WASHINGTON' �:av,, • L&A Job;No.;;7022 � (":${ Date March•18, 1997 - ' • .1 r Prepared for: - • NORTHWEST PROMOTERS,LTD , 15202 NE 167thPlacer . ,- `Woodinville,Washington 98077 -.i; Liu&Associates,Inc:', --. 19213,Kenlake Place Northeast - Seattle,Washington'98155-3242 • ' LIU & ,ASSOCIATES' INC.' Geotechnical Engineering ,Engineering Geology Earth Science ‘_ - March'18, 1997. : . • , „ ' Mr.-Ric Chan ky g ,.Northwest'Promoters,Ltd:•_ 1.5202 NE 167th Place , Woodinville;.Washin on 98077 Dear Mr:'Chang; Subject: .GeotechmcalStudy. -. Proposed Shopping"Mall " NE 4th'Street:and Union'Avenue NE Renton;Washington;' L&A Job No. 702"2 :'INTRODUCTION- " At your request:we have completedaa geotechnicalengiiieering study the.subject•project site Presented in; , ,this re' ortour':findings,-conclusions:and-recommendations of this stud The subject site is located on the'north side of NE'4th`Street,•near:the:intersection.of NE 4th Street and'Union ' 'Avenue NE,in Renton`:Washington:.:The`general l'ocation`of the is shown on.Plate 1.-Vicinity;Map. For' '• - • ,Our,use of this study;we have"been provideed'with Plans depicting the' eneral development la outand radin" P g P Y .g, g details:,The:plans provided include: 1) Site Boun /To'o liic'Surve "Plan,Sheets,%s and 2/2''dated 1_ �'Y P $�P Y • 28-97; and 2�,,Prelim naiy`Grading,and Storm Drainage Plan, Sheet C-1 Peel' Sani - Sewer Plan,uninar3' tary:; Sheet...,C-2 ':and Preliminary. Water:Plan; Sheet":C 3, .all dated:2=20-97.• .and: "prepared :b.' -'B ausen Consulting-En`ineers, Inc.•. .' PROJECT DESCRIPTION ; We understand that the roposed'develd ment,for-the:site.will be}a shoppingma11, that,includes four 4 ' commercial;;buildings,.Buildings:"A through.'D, with'paved parking,;access`;roadways;':_arid:related-site:• improvements: The buildings will all be above-grade'structures of'tilt-up construction Building'B located at the northern end of the`site will be two-sto while:'all other buil'din s wilhbe;sinle=sto All buildings will rye, $ S. �'� g .. • have concrete.slab-on-grade:floors. The s n of the buildings; ar � Site will be re=graded�for.the constnictio,, ,g,,� P king;"- . , .. and-roadwa s:_Site re= radin will include,;cut and fill.to achieve"a relativel unif rtn - y •g g y o grade that rises gently _ 1 to'the,east:. ' ''19213 Kenlake.,Place`NE. e t l 8 - ` :Sate;.WA= 9 155:3242•-� , - Phone(206);483-9134`. „Fax(206)486-2746'" , . _ >'1Vlarch 18,1997 - . • •Proposed,Slio ping,Mall. • • :I&A Job'No:7022: Page 2, According to the.plans prepared by�`Barghausen,the finished floor.elevations will:be at El. 400.50 feet'for Building A E1: 40100 feet for;Building-B,•E1:404:50 feet~for•Buildings'_C and D: :These finished floor • elevations'would require re-grading for the buildings Gas follows:: ' • Buildin A77 Fill:.• As:much as 6 5.feet above present,grade in the west,soutfi,•'and northwest coiner`f... Cut:-: As much'as 2;5-feet below resentgrade in,the northeast.:` " _ , ,P Buildin ;.B.. Fill: As much as'29''feet"abovepEsent grade in,the west-central,•and 10;feet in the eastern ;, central_area:` Cut: As much as 3-feet and•7 feet below presentgrade.in the central.porfion of the north lin e'and: southeast corner,respectively Buildin .C Fill:' .Amuch-as`4.5 feet above present grade on the south`end _, • Cut:- As much as 7:5 feet below iiresent grade;on:the north,end - .-NoJcontourlines are.provided on the survey.-plan in the area of this building. :We estimated that this building,will mostly be on fill:;' P The central arlcin lot'will•for the most art be'on'cut.` Geogrid-reinforced earthwalls-with,Keystone.block:g _ P f rn will;be constructed alon`.the western boon and`at.ahe• north est•co•rner':of the •site. ,These walls`. ;wilt from.about•6':to.8:feet l i •along.thesouth arid central portions'of the west'property.iine,and to-as.much:' as,17 feet hi at the north end: ckeries are!shown alon 'the'east 'ro`e line: The•hei t of the>rockeries., will be about 3 to:5 feet in'the`.south:and.central'-' ,portions rof the property.line;:and-iricrease'to'about 7 to 8 feet' the north end. O SERVICES,F PE ._ . The'purpose-of this study'i's"to.assist.in pioject.planning and deign bycliaracteriiing subsurface conditions P - witliintfie development area:;The,scope of this<study,is,•outlined in our-proposal'letter'of December9 ,1996:;` Work performed included.a`review.`of.tlie,.provided'development plans,' geologic 're search, 'subsurface •. t_" `explorations,usiii a rubber:tire:mounted backhoe •eotechrucal,en ineerin" anah ses`and the re aration of. this.re ort.p, ; , •„ LIU&.ASSOCIATES,'INC. - March.18;,1'9'9.7 M Pro osed,Sho` 'in a1P s L&A Job<No.7022 g q'• Recommended procedures for site'grading;_including subgrade preparation_"and:placement ot iitructUrall.fill, ..p and permanent eartb'euts;'and rockery,construction'will bey discussed:,: Geotechnical engineering recommendations for foundation soil;bearing-pressures,:floor slabs soil:'•parameters for.`design of,,geogrid= • ' ;reinforced:earth walls,pavement design and site drainage_will also be given. SITE CONDITIONS' SURFACE CONDITIONS: ; _ '--` .'The project site is'located•on the north side of NE`4tl Street,about 23q:;feet..West..Of:.its intersection,with Union Avenue NE: The'site includes;the'older,residential,and.commerciat properties at 3904:and 4004 NE 4th street: 'Locally,the,Parcel is bounded on:the_east by multi-farnily:residential development;,.on the west by commercial-properties;'on:the'north;by single._family residential,and'on;the:south by NE 4th Street::'. The roe is''rou rectan alai shay e"and'•measures'about'`625.feet b 432'feet,as. p � - y�., shown'on.Pl"ate 2 . Site and..Exploration Plan.-.:Tlie tong;dimension'•offl`the;parcel .runs'.north-south: :'In:the-'south, a closed` depression`.marks:the east-central'•portion:';of the property;•,iri ahe.,area°of;Buildings 'Surf ace water.is rioted an:this;depression:: In/the west,the'terrain slopes toward the"west-property-line,, fo'rmin 'low'areas'onahe:south end arid;west side of Buildin" A A,wet.subgrade•conditionwas encountered'`. on the'south,end;of Building A The;central`.ortion:of the:parcel forms"a broad',-;slightly-:elevated,terrain. - p • The northern one-third of the property:'is_-dominated by a relatively'steep sided;:east-west trending`ravine. The base of the;ravine_slopes.gently to.the west;,and has b"een_:filled along the west property'lirie: 'Tlie.filling' • • is from re':radin 'for the condomuuum/a 'artment develop pent to the.west::''A`:max mum vertical'relief of g $. -. p . P • about.30 feet is'indicated along the"south.side:of the ravine(atthe west end)as shown on the.site plan •A`ma'ori .,,,of the.propertysupportsagrowth`ofmoderate sizedever reen:and'deciduous trees'.brush,and a' • low:ground cover,:.A,cover:of blackberry:bushes.occurs-in'the-low:area`arourid'Building':D.:.Remnants'of „ older development m the.:central`:portion.,of the property includeF'a dirt'-surfaced;drivewYa powerpoles'`and p. "dines;'and:scattered`debris'troth.a'raied The street address of this development:is'3904.NE 4th '' .; ' Street:' Tlie southeast.corner:of the parcel supports a residence•aridautomotive repair•shop at 4004 NE 4th" Street. ' 'The:'land to:the north'of. the;shop,",is strewn''with old steel'.tanks, •dr uris,•5-gallon;cans;;;,plastic l containers,tires,and,other automotive.debris.:'The area immediately north of dus existiri residence'ex oses raw sewage:on""'the ground surface. This is presumably from a failed septic system;for_the house`and/or'.shop .`LIU,&:ASSOCIATES„INC: • ,,March'18 - 997 y.Proposed.Shopping Mall - L&iA JobNo: 7022. .' Page 4 ' gulloniswee o bser a ' ` h Howeve.r:anestimated10 to'20. ";� bildng. .Theextentof the uddlinSwas obscured-lh "blakbebuses. , . a -' r vedSon'thesurfce: The.effuent likely..draisto.thenoh, nto.the poorly-drained.low . lying,area`to be'occupied by=Buildirig D'.. • _.GEOLOGIC SETTING Re ional V'eolo.,iC and soils ma literature researched in this Stud includes: ` g g g ppmg Y. 1)- •Geologic.Map:Of,The Renton_Quadrangle;:King County Wash ngton,�by:D:,R.;Mullineaux, .1965'; ' U:S:Geological Survey Map'GQ 405: 'r'2 Soil•SurveyOf Kin `Court Washin o `1973, USDA:Soil-EConservation Service 'sheet 1"1: , '' :'*::''''''''::' :: " The landvi ;in this,region'comprises"the southein:extentof.the,Renton:highlands:;,It is:characterizedby a locally; ,,; ;; �- "irregular'surface of southeastward-trending''low-lulls and''.swales:';The southern`margin of,the highlands.lies ;' • about a mile to the.south, alori 'die-north,slope e.of the'Cedar River drairia e. '( gp. g. t'- `" .Tile 'eolo is ma 7n of this vicin shows,tlie terrain to be formed over'de osits of GlaciaT'Drift'from the, g g pp g` tY P ! Vashion Glaciation:"'The drift de osits'.a•re'shown to include hases'.of ablation,till-and to ent-till: The - P p , "=,'' - lodgment till comprises an':unsorted'mixture of sand, silt,el yand.gravel, which is commonly'referred'to'as a hardpan:"%The.high•densityof thus material-stems',froth being,overridden`by the.considerable weight of.the' • advancing•Vashon Glacier,,:which was;'some.3,000.to`4,000.feettliick'inti is'region: The lodginentis of'very' , - ,, -: -'''''t..' H' ' low"permeability;.except in,localized sand and gravel seams. It can `stand.in'steep:natural 'slopes and-ve tical cuts for lon eriod,and can; rovide`excellent'foundation,;su` porttwith1little;settlement expected:. The one to ., g1? . P PP. two.feet of the 1od ment till are,often weathered to a less°comp actandmore.p ermeable state _ gn?. p 1? `'The basal'.lod '' ent till is.overlain b ,a°ablation till,',of�'variable thickness: The ablation^till-is V similar in composition but.is':much:less,:comp act arid,coherent: The:ablation.till was`de'osited,as..tl e,s� ant glacial , -P ., 1?. p g � ice melted,"and;was not compacted by;the weight ofthe glacier.•The till is shown to transition'into'a oorl .`stratifieddiift in this,re ':on.�` f S. The:soil'.survey map ping:by Soil,Conservation Service.(SCS)shows.the',area tobelcoveied by',"Alderwood ',` • gravelly sandy loam;.6 to.15%oslopes,(AgC)": =Alderwood'series,soils form,m deposits of ablation till,which mantles'a've dense lod ent till'at de th`' . LIU;&,ASSOCIATES;INC.. 'March:18 1997. • _i' • Pro 'osed:Shopping Mall ' r L&A:Job-No:7022, PageS` SUBSURFACE CONDITION '' ite,'were ex lored:with a"-total`of=17 test its excavated:with arubber-tiied - �Subsurface`conditions at.the s p p _ . backhoe. Tliede ths:ofthese'test.pits-ran ed:fromabout3.5to,13"feet.- TestPits:TP-1 through;TP-12'were. excavated on'Jan 29; 1997 .Test Pits=TP-13.through,TP-17=were`•excavated'on March 3;:,1997, as • - P ermission:of en-ty to the southeast corner of the site was not_secured initially.-:Pit locations:were`laid'out.m, the field by tape.measurement'and interpretation of site-features using:the proyided'site:plan. :Surface `; 'elevations '''the.;exploration 'location's Were' 'plated ;fr'om.the `rovided topographic .data: The`:' , at p � p . .. approkiniate locations'of the test pits are on,Plate',2.' An en ineering:geologist from.our'office was presentduring the subsurface explorations,who examined ttie • Soila and,geologic conditions encountered and":maintained logs'of the test pits:.;:The soil in.the"test pits were; • nallY classified in 'eneral'accordance-with:United Soil Classification System,a copy of.wluch is presented on Plate 3: The logs of test'p pits areapresented on Plates'4,throu 12. Ranh testPits:encountered`lod ent till,deposits at-relatively shallow depths throughout the site.' 'These'late, Pleistocene-: 'e. 'lacial.ode` osits.are:`intepreted to,`corres and,with 'the:USES: and''SCsf mapping;:and _ ' comprise'the oldest materials:encountered in the test pits:-yThe till.was':encountered at`deptlis.of about 1;0"to. '4:5 feet below resent': rade.' The till is'com osed:of'a,poorl 'sorted assemblage ofgravel,and'scattered;' '_': R ,g P. P. Y- cobble in a coin act Silt`:.fine sand'matrix:;A'weathered zone:has-developed.m�about theupper.2.5.feet of the> .. till. The'.weathered'zone,is re"-brown in color with a lightly mottled„texture,;and is.in a medium dense-.to l' ,The underl :`fresh.till ris re in color and is ve dense:'1Test`Pits'TP-6 ":TP-7 and TP-8 dense state: ying, g y ry - • encounteredinterbeds or',zones of water bearin silty sand with ravel within.the till;at'depths.of about 7.5:to., { ;' g tY g • 9:5 feet beloww present'g �rade:'.•The till shows va �e stratification in a:few locations: - . till f. ' thickness:="'This material is.identified as '° -� The very•-dense lodgmenttill is mantled bya ablationo varying 1n.the test it logs:'-This material is icall in aloose-condition'-and takes on.an oran a-brown= ' 5 - _ 'ablation'drift p g- tYp Y g. f in"the:'to t- its: .� color: The ablation drift was`fond'to.ran` 'e`in`thickness fromabout,0:7. 4 feet to eet. s p .V.a -d res of root'penetration;were noted in these materials. :On,the:average, 4 to 6.inches'ofrforest. rYing- ee g -, li er'' d and-fine:root mat were'observed:in-areas' undisturbedb ast=deyelo ine,t% radiri ; tt � �, topsoil Y-�p. P. g g activities: . Fill was encountered in Test Pits TP-2,TP-14,,TP-15,:,TP-1.6'and TP-_17. :TP-2 encountered'at`least 2 feet.of• fill on the top of the ridge running along the north'property line.,,Tlieupper elevations of the ridge haye;been, :LIU:&'ASSOCIATES,INC.: I • M h 18, 997:. ,� arc1 , Proposed:Shopping Mall' > in' L&A Job No:1022 disturbed,and filling;in•this area is apparent in some locations..The-quality of the fillis.judged-,to be`poor in - the area of TP-2: Pits-TP-14,through TP-17 encountered scattered,fill around the older house and shop on the- southeast portion'of the property.; Fill soils containing petroleum products were,encountered in.TP-16 which'_` is'located.about-15 feet west of the.shop building.. This material•occurred in a 4.to:6,inch layer some 2 feet below.present'grade.''The fill,contains oil cans,used oil filters, 5 gallon can lids, and assorted automotive • litter in a dark grey/black'soil'matrix:_The soil expressed a diesel/fuel-oil-odor:' Elsewhere in this vicinity the, , fil',.varies from a few inches to-about:'2:feet in-thickness: Of the 5'test pits performed around the existing•- development,:only,TP-16:encounter''.waste petroleum products: . GROUNDWATER Groundwater seepage was`encountered•in water bearing sand seams:within the lodgment till in Test.Pits TP • 6;T'1?-7:and TP8- . .The.saricl seams`were encountered'at:depths of about to 10:5'feet'below present grade:' ..: • The groundwater-.seepage:is believed;to be perched water trapped within a fairly.-limited area;of•the till : sequence , „. Seasonal.perched ground water appears to occur-:during.the•wet; winter months at this site Generally,the:' ' erched; round'water develops within`the weathered soil horizon,over the, dense lodgment• � .. ' p ground_ podgme t till.` -These•• ' conditions are a seasonal response to rainfall,and water levels may be at or within a few feetof the ground surface during-prolonged•rainy pnods The till has.a very,low downward permeability;;causing the;rainfall infiltration to flow laterally within••:the'looser weathered:soils.'The migration of this perched,grourid,water'is. .' termed•"interflow" The direction of flow.'is controlled by the gradient of the contact between the weathered = >;' material andthe'underlying till.''',This,contact is,usually;uneven,and may reflect the surface topography: ' Perched ground water at this'site'is_most prominent in poorly drained,low areas: These include:1)'the.closed' :' . depression on the common ends of buildings.0 and D,•2)the base ofthe•north Swale(Building B) and3)'.the "low area on'thie south:endof Building;•A-:-.;Perched ground water:tends:to dissipate during the dry summer ' ... monifis.-1 This type of ground water is particularly troublesome to'subgrade preparation aid grading efforts.: -- ,.during the wet winter and transitional spring-months. _ LIU&..ASSOCIATES,INC:: h'1"8 1997:Marc ,.r 'Pro osed.=Sho" 'ing mall _ • P Pp • L&A Job.No..7022 ;`. '•Page 7` ,. _ - - . . - -. ... ;DISCUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL'' �,. Based onhsiibsurface"corictioris encountered in-the test`pits.and our understanding ofthe-project sco e, t' is our:Opinion•that'the subject,site:is:suitable for the• ro esed.'develo ment.froma eotechnical.viewpoint., :.the',native:glacial;drift and'till soils'are.:,expected to'provide good'-support for 'foundations;.floor slabs,; pavements• :and for Structuralfill::'Pocket fts`of existingfill,if le in:place'for parking areas,should be'expected.'. • to 1 rovide`a reduced level'.of p avement:Sub' rade, performa• nce;'`,C• onventional footin f•oundations` 'lacedrin'.. P p g p g :P: undisturbed lod ent till or^on:structural'fill ma be used fo'r su orting roposed Buildings:. SITE PREPARATION AND,GRADING CONSIDERATIONS. ,• Topsoil;.loose fill and unsuitable,soils;"m'the,'root zone.within"'areas of buildings,,parking lot and,roadways should'be stripped:'Areas'.suliject:to previous development typically"contain buried foundations,''utilities,oil. ' • -and`septic tanks, wells or-other`features which effect new development.: These.featurres,within;areas..,of • _ b'uildirigs,parking lot and'roadways should:all be removed: The-exposed subgrade soils•should bp-,proof= :;'• • rolled.with a vibratory compactor to a non=yielding state prior:.to placing structurefill.? - :'Substantial excavation;isindicated to accommodate portions.of_the buildings and parking area ;Faith,cuts aze -•exected to be: -rimarily,witliin tlie`glacial"drift,and till materials. "We'would.caution that.:wet subgrade conditions will likel r;exist•in'the'low-1 areas withiriand adjacent to:'1 :south area of'Buildin` A 2 south..': ' Y Yu?g._ J ) g_. , ) • 'and,east areas of BuildingC and,3 'iiorth,and'east areas;of Buildm .•D,-,;.burin eriods of wet weather in saturated•soil,conditions .sp ecial•me Y 9asures. ma be're uireito facilitate construction: Interim,excavation radin should be Sloped toprevent ondin It should'be noted„.that the, facial^;drift'and tiff•soils'are considered;moisture'sensitive; and will:tend'to deteriorate if worked .:,during.rainy weather-:,(the:predominant • rainy season is generally November through:April);or in a"saturated condition:::Delays in(construction'•activity; '. ':' • may:result from a deteriorated soil.condition A layer of crushed rock or.`pit-run gravel.(possibly.used, • •..conjunction with'a geotextile);placed'ovei,the subgrade..soils'may be, required�for'supporting-construction* traffic':and''providing a working surface.during:construction. • _ - 'Tem 'ovary'and-.permanent''site.?grades°should` established.to'minimize erosion potential,:and;to avoid p.- _ ..:ponditig,'ofWater thaCCOuld degrade subgrade conditions Commonly used•municipal standards;forerosion; ectedtoaddress'most.erosi• oblems when•quali earthwork o erationsare conducted:', protection are-.exp 'ori:pr ty"' p ' - LIU&''ASSOCIATES,INC:; -March •18, 199'1 ;, . " Proposed"Shopping'Mall • r L&A Job°No 7022' • ' , 1, 'EXCAVATION AND FILL'SLOPES. • _ Under no circumstances should;temporay excavation slopes:be greater.than the limits specified'in local;state • " and national government safety regulations, Temporary cuts greater than four'feet in height should be.sloped at an.inclmation'no'steeper than'1H:1V in the surficial fill,abalation•drift,_:and weathered;till :Vertical cut' ---, maybe made m the vey dense unweathered.till to a maximum•depth'of 15.feet:. For greater,depth,•the cut in::' 'of;J unweathered till shouldbe no,steeper than 0 5H:1V. If•sloes:of,these iriclinationS carniot"be.achieve I temporary shoring"may:'be.necessary. The above cut slopes`assume groundwater"seepage would not-•be ' ! . encountered"during excavation: 'Should'groundwater be encountered;:the excavation,should,,be .halted:' a ,.Y ' immeditely:and ewe be informed:to evaluate'.the stability;'and"revise,the inclinations`:of••the,;cut slopes as P' necessary. Surface'runoff should not be:allowed toflow;uncontrolled over the top"of.cut slopes into'the excavated area: - 'E Exposed cut,slopes 'should be.covered with plastic sheets during ,construction to. -miimize'erosion and slou from rainwater: Permanent`fill .embankments,:-are ex'ected to.,standrat.``various-slo es ..de end ' :on".the;material- and '; 1?... - p pe g compaction effort used:''For embankment:constructedwith structural fill•as recommended m•STRUCTURAL =. • •FILL.section•of;this report,'the embankment slopes-should be no steeper"than 2H,:to1V: Permanent fill; embankments-should;be hydro-seeded'`or,.planted w n_With`vegetation as.soon:as:.possible'to:provide,erosion protection.: .•� - - i _ l ST'RUCTURAL:FILL Structural fill'is'the•fill placed.under:footings,: slabs-On-grade,- avements'and:-behind retaining walls`that K • suppoit loads:'Structural;fill should.consist-of cleansoil&withparticles no larger than.four.inches and befree of or anic and other deleterious substances; Structural fill-should be laced with a.moisture content:near'its.' • • g r_ : ' • O timuni-moisture.content: The,o timu n moisture`content,is:the water.content iri the Soil that enable the:soil to,becom acted t0the.hi`1 est'd y densi• '`for-a •iyen-com actioneffort: P gh rY, tY, g. p . • The on-site "clean, glacial,soils"are:moisture-sensitive, and'may•be:used`as-structural.fill only under fair weather condition: Imported soil for structural fill,if required,�should.be of clean,free-draining,granula soil • { • `containing•no'more than 3%by:weight,finer_than,:the No:-200:,-sieve based;on thee•fraction of the material' passing No. Sieve,and,should have individual particles not greater than.four inches.> Imported<structural'fill:. 1• should be:stock filed separatelyfrom the.on-site`soils:. LIU&:ASSOCIATES,'INC: March,18,1997 - Proposed;Shopping Mall ' . " l; L&A Job No 7022 j - Page 9 Structural fill should be'placed in'no more than 10-inch lifts in its,loose state,with each lift"compacted to'a . - minimum percentage of,the dry, density determined by.,ASTM .D1557-78- (Modified,Proctor Method)as follows:' 1 7 _ Application. -• %of Ma Maximum Dry Density • ' , .Under:footings, slabs"and walkway :Roadway/driveway/parking area 95,%for:top-24'inches' -. , . ; subgrade _and-90%q:below a Basement/retainingwall backfill 95%o for top:12 filches, r: , ;' and 90/o'.below . ; Utility.trench backfill -95%for top,24 inches and 90%.below FOUNDATIONS ' I Conventional:footmg'foundations,may be used for suppormg the proposed':buildings,.:.We'recommend'that ' the footings be p laced on the,medium-dense to dense; weathered'lodgment till,the very dense, unweathered, lodgment till, or s•structural fill:'Structural fill,pads supporting'footings should be constructed.in.accordance , ' ;with recommendations in the STRUCTURAL PILL section of this.report: The.width of a structural:'fill pad . should be at;least the width of footing'it su orts. lus the thickness of the structural fill pad:;Structural fill _.- ,) .,and concrete should beplaced-on undisturbed soils. Water•should not be allowed to accumulate in;the footing '. trenches.: Soft.or loose:.material at^the bottom of footing trenches,`should'be:thoroughly-.cleaned,or ,. __ _;: recompacted. 1,._ Exterior footings should extend a minimum of 18 inches below adjacent.ground surface and interior column ' . footings,should::extend'a'minimumof 12:mches below the bottom.of adjacent;slabs. Minimum footing widths for continuous footings and for individual'spread'footings should:be 18 and 24 inches;respectively:.- ;';' For footing foundations constructed as'outlined above,we recommend that an'allowable'soil bearing pressure of 7500 sf! ounds er square:foot).be,used-for:tlie.footings placed'in unweathered:.lodgement till,:-and laced on/ 'Weathered'lod 'ement` = 'till and structural i fill We estmate,total,' i �. 3000 'psf for.the'footings:'p g _ . 'n " should,be'less than 3'%4:inch:and differential settlement across•the;building.widths shouldbe less. settlenie is s g than 0 5 inch for the footing foundations,,A one-third,increase in the-above•allowable soil bearing pressures - may be used when considering:short-term'transitory wind or seismic loads.' Lateral loads:can be:resisted by :friction between\the'foundations and the subgrade,.or the passive.earth -pressure acting the below-gradeportion:of the foundations:::par the latter,the foundations must be:poured LIU.&ASSOCIATES,°INC: i 'March:-18,.I997,: , Proposed Shopping Mall'`' . L&A Job No: 7022, Page:10: "neat"''against 'undisturbed'soils'or backfilled with a .clean; free-draining, compacted.structural fill.:-:We recommend thata•passive earth,pressure.of 400 pcf(pounds per cubic foO4 be.usedf'for.lateral resistance: A coefficient of friction of 0.55.between the footings and the subgrade soils maybe used:'These are unfactored i .ultimate values: .. •1 ; j SLAB-ON-GRADE FLOORS :Slab-on-grade floors should be_placed on firin'subgrade`prepared-as::Outlined SITE-PREPARATION AND • j;..r . GRADING.CONSIDERATIONS and STRUCTURAL FILL sections:.of this report. Where;moisture control is,critical;:the slab�on-grade;floors:should be placed on a capillary break-which is.'iri.turn-placed--on='the :compacted subgrade: 'The,capillary,break should consist:of,a minimum 6-mch-tluck layer of free-drauun 1 gravel Of crushed rock.contauung.no more than 3%o,byweight passing the Igo;•:4 sieve:;We_recommend that:a `vapor,barrier; such as a 6-mil:plastic membrane,:be.placed.over the;capillary break:to,keep moisture.from Migrating-Upwards: Two to four inches of sand may, be placed over the vapor barrier to aid the curing:of the' 'concrete: .. I. GEOGRID-REINFORCED EARTH-WALLS "• . • Geogrid=reinforced earth walls are constructed of a block of struct ural;filtreiiiforced:withlayers of geogrid mesh:that"acts as gravity-wall to'resist over-turningand sliding failures:,The Ke stone block fading should'be: supported on a level;compacted;.'crushed rock pad. The subgrade over:which the,structural fill is to be placed should. be prepared ;in-,accordance 'with''SITE PREPARATION AND'.GRADING''CONSIDERATIONS SECTION section of tlus'report. For,a;geogrid-reinforced earth".wall.to function properly,--it is of the utmost : ', p. .P Y� , • ! importance thatcwater hi and flowing toward the reinforced soil Mass collected and drained away.from.the soil ass: This Would,reiquire a vertical drainage blanketao be-placed imtnediatel" behind'the`Ke stone"bl r r facing and between the reinforced'soil mass;and,the native.soils; and`a'hoiizontal" a blanket` drainag between'. the bottom of the reinforced:soil mass land the native foundation Soils:. :The drainage blankets should consist of=free-draining, granular:.structural filly A perforated PVC pipe should be placed at.the base of the block'• - facing;hydraulically connected"with.the drainage blankets,to drain away collected water •- ; • ..i For the.•design:of the•geogrid-reinored',earth walls,we recommend the following soilarameter s"• fc p be .(. J. Soil end, benSity Angle :of Intenial:Friction: Cohesion Structural.Fill 130 pcf 33°- - .0. 'Native'Foundation Soil ' 120'pcf ' ; 500 pal, LIU'&ASSOCIATES,"INC ' "Proposed:Shopping - --. :. L&'A'Job'No: 7022' • Page 11' ' PAVEMENTS Pavements should",be'constructed.on -sub`rude n. g prepared in accordance with recommendations in SITE:, PREPARATION AND,GRADING :CONSIDERATIONS, section':of this report.', :TThe: performanceH of pavements is closelylrelated to the condition's of the subgrade soils supporting the pavements.'It is essential that the subgrade soils be in a firm,non-yielding condition prior to paving Proof rolling the:subgrade with-a " •- piece':of fully=loaded; heavy,construction":equipment,.such as•'a udump truck,;should be done to:verify,this condition. Pavement.design depends on--the-su ortin ca abili of the sub rude-soils•and;the:traffi c'.coriditions to p �j c to;consist of amix of assen er,vehi sa ;whchahe avement will lie sub'ected;-.We anticipatethe.traffic - : • . passenger:. cles.and:•• '' si some heavy delivery;trucks.:Based on this information,we recommend the'following pavement sections: ; ; Roadways:Three(4)inches of asphaltic concrete.(AC)•over six;(6)inches of crushed rock-.base(CRB)':- - •i'..Parking Lot:Two and onehalf(2 1/2),inches of AC over'four(4)inches,of'.CBR•'•s• • Paving,materials'used''should conform-to the Washington State Department of.'Transportation (WSDOT) specifications'forClassB' l p asp alf concrete aril-CRB surfaciri ' Long term pavement performance,will depend'on,surface:drainage:: A poorly;drained Pavementsection will, be'sub`ect to remature.failure as'a'result ofsurf a. .w J 1?. ace Water'-infiltrating soils-and reducing;r their supporting capacity For optimum"performance, surface.-drainage gradients of no less than:two.percent, 1 'are.recommended:' Storm,'runoff'on:pavements,should be collected into-catchlbasiris to"drain' into a permanent storm sewer:',:Some degree;of lengitUdinat and transverse CraCkingof the.'avement surface '''' • 1.: should,b'eJ:expected overtime Regular inaint enance should be'planned to seal cracks:�when they o y ccur::' ROCKERIES: - A rockery wall bynature'is not:an engineered retaining.wall,:such as a reinforced'concrete wall.,Although a< rockery wall can provide;some.degree of retention capability,its.main.function is to serve as a protective facing to retard the,weathering and erosion'process-to the.earth'embankmenfliehind the rockery,wall:` .;To achieve:a''satisfactory' rockery wall,:the earth`embankment`behind'the:.wall must be'stable;by;itself. ~In' .-addition;the roct a ,'wall must be constructed.in a•proper"way to keep the earth:,embankment stable.on •,i long-term basis: The criteria for properly;constricted rockery•walls-_are included in the•Standard:!Rookery' \. Construction Guidelines;published by the,Association of theRockery,Contractors: ` ' LIU&ASSOCIATES I+ U'r. , : " March 18, 1997 ' r -. . .Proposed:ShoP in Mall .. , ''' - � , , L&A Job No: 7022,: , I- - . 'Pa e.12-- .. . . . : • - According to the site plans,rockeries up'to-8 feet high will be required along the'east property line.-.the cuts_ i• for the'construction of rockeries will)be in,the medium=dense abolition drift;and dense to very'dense,lodgment' - - till deposits It is our opinioriahat.long-term stability..of cuts.in-these soils-faced with`a rockery wall Co be _, . , achieved: We'recommend.that vertical cut m•the,very=dense lodgment till be used,:with the overlying;less , ' 'competent soils excavated back at-a'1H lV,slo e.• "-, -; p, P { In general;the,rock'material to be used:for:the.rockeries should-be hard;sound,:durable and free of cracks " '.fissur,"es'and'.other defects: The.stones should be-as-nearly-rectangular as possible and stacked tightly against'-;-?: -i •-. .one anottier'tb minimize the'voids:betweenthe'stones: :The voids should be keptto no:more than'6.inches' icross hi any direction: The facial stones of the rockerieSshould be.sloped back.at,I batter no steeper than- . . " - H. The rockeries construction should start as'soon as possible after the.excavation-Of the cut and/or fill .:" ' ' configuration.is.:made.' 'A trench at.the,bottom,of the rockeries-should be excavated,.'for-placing'the=base,'. ' course and a drain pipe. 'Thebase-course stones":should be:seta;on.finri;,,stable:soil at,least 12 inches : 'but not moretlian,18 inches below the.finish:grade in front of:the rockeries::The`drain:pipe-should.be a few,. :r inches below the.bottom of the base-course stones:. The rockeries should be constructed such,that the stones of each.successive course,would stagger with the,stones'of the'previous course:,The drain=rock(or.filter rock) used for backfilling the,rockeries should'consist of 2=to 6-inch'quarry;rock::The.drainirocksbould be placed ' .n liffts after tthe.completion:of each course,of the facial stones " - _ ' ry DRAINAGE' The:Storrii•Drainage and Utility.Plans indicate-that surface runoff from impervious`surfaces :of the site will ' ,be'directed;into an underground detention%infiltration:system:'The :very dense, unweathered lodgement.till underlyingthe site is of verylow•permeabilityThe infiltration rate.-of the till is estimated to he on,the order . f•0 0 'MC h •r h :A r.e 1a f'-to,. . r u-. ; soilsper 1 ;On'site cause, erched roundwater to accumulate above.-the.underl unweathered:till: 'Over;a:lon P g underlying g ' f ',period;.the'perched'groundwater-would saturate and weaken the'native soils and structural'fill supporting the:° , :parking,lot'and r roadway pavements,;'and:can;,cause.the'-pavements to"crack and crumble:'''`Furthermore„a 1_ substantial portion of the•water`;discharged into the subgrade will,mig'rate,,down gradient°;(to-the-.west),;as a [ ,, ' ,interflow onto adjacent,properties,'.•.The:adverse,:iiiipact'''of discharging..stonnwater 'into,the subgrade'.on :, .. _- , ' ':proposed development and adjoining properties should be carefully:evaluated byyour Civil Engineer:„. - Ve>understand that options of releasing stormwater into,the city sewer'system with:minimal,on=site:retention ' - and storing-stonnwater in underground retention vaults of sufficient capacityare:alsobeing•considered: Itfis - _ ;our.opinion'that-from'`the view point.of subgrade soil stability, either of.these two. options will.be"more " 1 I i. , ': '' ," .LIU:&ASSOCIATE'S INC: 1 , 1V1arch 18, 1997, Proposed Shopping Mall s .- r • " . • • L&A'Job.-No7022; • •• + :. desirable than''the infiltration system: ;' ri i r fi n 1-co struct on;Ovate s_ould of be-al owed to•stapil-ut an ',area where footing s-,slabs or.••avenientare g , - Y g > p to be cons'tnmted. •Final site:gradesshould:direct.surface runoff.away from:proposed„buildings We.'suggest the finish ground be sloped;at a gradient of'three•percent:minimum:for:a-distance of at least�..10'feet:away fromae buildin exce t'iri'the°areas°that:are to be paved Surface water should be.•collected b catch basins and tightlined to discharge'into.a'permanent storm sewer system-; footing subdrain system should;be`installed:around the perimeter of'.each proposed:building `The subdrain;: i - - , should,cons st of a four=inch minimum=diameter erfo or slotted' "ri id' P i laid rated o e VC;pipe,- a,few.inches;`_. � p , �._ g. � p � ,p • w the bott om i belo of footings with a gradient sufficient to,generate flow.by gravity. The drain line should be`._ embedded in,surrounded'.by,and covered'withia free-draining washed rock;.pea gravel,or other'free-draining• '� ranular material,wra,' ed=in a`la' er'of filter fabric:`The.footin `subdrain should besti" tlmcd to.disch' e,G into a'permarient:storm'sewer system. • Undernocircumstance should roof.downspouts:drain lines be connected'to,the"footing drain system: `'All roof, downspout,drains must be separately tightlinedto discharge into,a,storm sewer The footing drain s' stem. should have a-muuinum"of:12:;iriches of vertical�fall,before it is:connected,to.the:storm sewer system. - >recommend"that suf cient cleanouts be installed at strategic:locations to allow.for:periodic maintenance •°I footing'and downspout'.drain s'ystems,' LIMITATIONS This report;has been prepared,specifically for the subject,site'and the:exclusive;use by Northwest Promoters,,. L_ td, and'their.associates:and representatives for planning and design-of this'.project:=,Tlie'data',and "report' should•be provided`to prospective:contractors'for their.'bidding'of•estimating:pitiposes, but thereport 'conclusions'and'irite` retations should riot be constiued as.a wairan of the'subsurface:conditions;', rep The;scope of our'work :does;not%include 'services 'related';to;'construction;;safe recautions,.and''.ouc LL recommendations are'not intended'to'direct the contractor's:methods; techniques;sequences or:procedures; ., except:;as 'specifically.described iii our report for design considerations:.';There are possible.variations''in :subsurface conditions.:Within;the`limitations'of'scope,schedule and budget,'our work has,been performed in. I accordance',.with generally accepted,practices followed-in this area:at the:t tine,thereport.was.prepared:` :No + I other.warran ex�ressed or im lied �is made:� :�� , LIU'&:ASSOCIATES' INC; • March 18, 1997 Proposed Shopping Mall F L&A Job No.7022 Page 14 . We are pleased to have been of service on this project. If you have any questions-regarding this report or - need further:consultation,please,feel free to callus. Yours very truly, , LIU&ASSOCIATES,INC.. 3 o-'r'ii Wks 71171 7 J.S. (Julian)Liu, Ph.D., P.E.,.. Consulting Geotechnical Engineer Twelve plates attached , , ' Distribution: Seven copies to Olympic Associates One:copy, to Ricky Chang/Northwest Promoters, Lid., = - One copy to'Barghausen"Consulting Engineers, • ' LIU.&ASSOCIATES, INC. •t t' �i M1F t.'^Y� •j:`1 1� +1+h..' 1 ,. ,ri `. ^ 'II ,'` '',`/}''t� .:y'o'4F•, tFLFM g�'Y�+ ," t ' � N ',/ • çiPJfP • 1_ , . fa f - a t l' ! � I r0}H:• /► RPD } : + �4 � • ,4 , : r PRO ECT •s '• 1" 04`1 i;' `+ ,;p°� ; . a C 1�t°' •}� T . 'r 7 ,A\ll �� l'j�`(�t' .I f 1�y t•_ ''• < f 6;.+1' f),(14? {" °" '•YID 4• , *t ,p 1`','-. �j,"Ef t . `tip 'Ws.,bU•i 1 :.,,i• CS... hrya 1i r UF�.'13, 1rb',,• f�G " F' t. '!; r in''' , �},r',,r;t t 9a 4+ .: �r��1 o y +e tr Re,',5lrf '4lr' iy' Ta nr' ,A,!tF.AttilAll' C tl o, i 71gq17� !iiJ ; J �,cl„ 9 4,1:r ,- ; >V',�,1,• ..,i.: '�' ¢` i9Y-•�t{ ', 1 i, .' *.'1.%v t• +3,t 'q'''' Q • S 1- A' ',J.£:� �4-• :,":;;''• :• ...$ ,wv.,}a , -••ti .7't"ir.4t,;-.;}.T-•4,,.a ",:; •,f.. w •�`y1 ti ,,`:, 'f1 r^e' j .. r tr •f 3 �,=r.1k,ltit`'k ""' �sF.� 10.*:,.,.Y ''f'•`'''Ll.W:., . -' .+ µ r,• tf, . i..�i'.-T, it' 4t SE, 13; I V- 4' N e "'3 is'.'ro u f f b fir';,, 'l'!' ,'!.'t}}'l:%t`NE: 'j1 ?. • ..;: r74.4!: .:1 , y5;: S t.t,l,i . , - TMv`f'� �� ':�i'1t�1ffs:t '�„yn;� .�T .1 > �i y r;�.� •�,+,1:' �' , j„Jr rg ; + �f. 'SE. f,• /�'��/!f �;+!'` w ,�1r t�+l 4 y6/!}. ;;,'... ^Vj:}"4:t,'tFt '-'.,: Li W;1 •a0 ^1Lo';F'..f,','a! 'RSv,: -1 1'� i.6 V H ".� N F,.1 i �1fl `'' s<e ,e , . YY M. (' s: `s, , s .� tp,^ i t', S "�t ,, ,Y, 1 q. ,p :!' =t' + (' t ^h,,..s°tY F K 1 � "�, (y, tf.}3•,, �.r "k !, t �L, ,, ''+•` ,rYl ' '• : 5,�,,,,ai:�i{l' rff•cer 1'\,< b. % ,. {`=I';'..? .0:1.;�+ 't,A,�;,41-.0� ';` �(. l f 4� ;� • 'r�jf'f°'t'�.y 1L,):�6` b,r' w^{� 5, T +i' s Gi +,t f„ •k+}''.t i'ak•'' b5,� '*, y, ;�' c 1; t g +" 4 • ,t �'i' t ' E f s c r , y t, ;�^;,. ,,' i yt;9 , j} ,: ,7 ^ i'� '�'f'- rel' G' : , 2; ys•44•f� :*,,, !'Lv,,,`f,;/,g, 't�{ • F' � ��'l '- '4,i , t R F �1 '~ , rµf ".{ "�� DC V�i t.t-1 :/ f r Ypy ,f[ ta,•, �`i. tjti 7 v t' �¢ f � � � 1� ' n._vk c" ayk t� 7' 0 r i >t'iG�FI tir ,s•e 0 .f { fa M i * ' fi • >' t yfiy SE a<' , ,, • `l ( • tt i t vf13't}'•� r, i- ., `r3 "7F � - . t� �a^ � _ s r'` 135TH �e ' . .:(0- ,,,1f.#� �. i 4rt r 7 /1 1 1 r'„ l��,�e��titip 44 F, S+�'• 1 } f:Y""11l ;t t t-5• 4 . �c` „IT; • SE�i ' i• ,Yf! f�A�."t' . 1 �,t y C ,y �•• :i 5 ,' t 1 ,+,4.C`r�F rr 'f r9,�J�(''�`F'i4 r r ,�, 1�� 4Ij. �,� S' � , '1'{,'"��• h fist' ,,.,� <��t' - r. 16() •7}� tt"�i�rj;��h G•�� S6 r � " p t�`,.�� M�Yti`t�.;r 4"�•;�h '1'r.'j,�,t,ry�u a.0 r �_ 'i Wk - .y, � I .S� 1 's. :..t4».•... t",d',4" R!# ,•i., � S"ni';s,�'i4 • ;•'34 :YO;'`lS�,.i;.�,l! .r°'1Fs' .,�r ..r' 4. • - ey'1-}\'y4.-,a�"�l 4t+' //�,,•� �,,}r�� ••''Y t• t •n1 ;ws'yF�;,- r...'SY.b•+\•'j11,r,Fi� cEf`f �° +1 ` Or .-�.:�t" 1' - "Sr" '!i c'',1i.ss ii: 4 1}.- 4.d: V `y 1 f' ' 4.^. �,: i'�'+:.,:ti,✓,,,,,' �,.:f ,Yj.q: �}' iV - '•, . ,, t' t. !• a�, `Sn'T:�., d• .2 �a.,fr, '{. t .�t% T,t r�ll ,s{'+,5 C,�c:�,:3••`�i .rt }. � f" � P { t ° , I „. . vi3O �'f�d n,, }e fS4'l-i?,", .i. 9 �` _'� fir/ '' 'fiA",:(1'... '..ed1{ t . '',• 1..'r7�'}cs1, d'i' R " 1 .", '47 r' 1 r�l , 'f^ i' i4"5 'Y 9,,FI A ',r titfii,b 'ti.4,' !Ali, . 'l''''4 t , .*i �,Y f ,.. s• 7a 1 ; A,1 ^. M$ „ N... r 'rl,.r ;`/ 1 3'3"r IF ,'.-'1 •QI • '.j s;..,e: '•#t r f'is .krt r '1`'.s • t .. -.-.',. ' .'' 1'}} A.1 4*" ^-- �J fret ,• +'xs, lie, 12' f'a�v r a.. u•. Aliggit 's r+ . ^ 7 1'q{ S A (tt, 2 `ei{- F e i.4, '�''st < tj! {xl ,3. I t ,i• .t' 4 •ti r .s ., m�, �} ',6 �t �tix },, 4 • !rf'.' t' .�' ti'l�t''�G"�ii' `, '�rY, i.r p 'T�. s'�i.: ,;•' {. rat ��z.yl'a}" �� !c x• !",b tti ? i A ti'. {4 q, a /`'t". Vt SE 1 :•' ��g.lf iv., r.1 t� ! �t�"t .' ! F ?t�Y 49> ,11)4 •J/ `., 1 / tiO aS'f i, • ;t , f�4 xi.: '{+1 t d T,Mat '�4,14.l 044 ti u r,F 1�q ti.k {f,,,i • 142NL , ht =. � 1- -v„ t . st `!fs 5 ^t`C Y7 b 'Saar e. .,r E•l,i'�sE, s *,..t'd'. � d Ff� T `'fT ,i + d - a '� a •r M l f ! ff •S� 5fry", • ,p .�` ,+P { T.. V Ztb' la fI,1} 4M'..V'�. �. 1. S �• S3�Y��{ ..(�k:'� b4r 1 Y' .�� r ! 1'rfgr .� �M1 �.f I rJV��%�'f� �.1' -/1• i// tl:. 5X}�T'r•�444',r' f1SZr !1k t,,.s.,�'Y�".,,"�'iY .., yl il�w,,,, ♦r ~;�, t '` ,. ,Ftk g; 41 �;,?�. jr}t e�,x-7C 1�•,..„ i,,"• �ti ,•t:t 2,Tt:i1r { `: 'w- i-^ 4w �t3(lli".1 ,, 1 r r4,.` I : 3-- • +.- }}$,f3i�? F44.�4.0,,if,-,;:y' ^A`'f..1 0h-.t.v.,:Ir o,y.,."' r7 6>,,,v,4�f.+b�1°,.'tt. i:(;,:4 i`4 ., ,'1,��,'��i'. l• p •S .! • ^( .09 `. . ' 1�'1-.W'(: 4i^� ,.n ed F.'. -+7•,-.,.. .M, l.•C`1'• i",..7t':tklt f, 'k *)�vd '\ MI ♦ f: • r •4. ¢¢piit1 'I -l1^Y��`f't`Tl.."p��r,�.,�,^bf��• F'.i`Lt,` '��,�'+?r {Da�.C.C.. ` •fl�'rON. ' 7. �+. 6F�y�.G�'•��t�4�. :�''�i}yi�y-�y�, �� •y}19 7.Z�jF' ,,try�\ 'ifs(�� k�7 ,',�ic'tt't}Yt'4�u' • �'t j''" ''.X • S.'y-.,"'.C.C. ,7; "'Sw z Ifii•( '�'';�tF ,:SA?.'S }"'1, �t� P r 4i` nic. art' : !M,�y' iri .jj,, yy �t�.�t;`Y"y�Y��µ ,f• ., 4 � y Mtn ` F tq� y{,� ;1 t,.,{ ofF_ 91�' ,4�'• Yr•:,v 4••' '. „`V t;�7h3Ar,,..", ' r ; 1,< . • t' Vi '4 `31' "-,1-(,N�.tG 1,G 4,,I�jMtnt 1-i {f :1,1,11 s3,,• • ik 1.. ;11 „g�T`` `v.4 salH1 1 i x -.;, 4,..L '�y' F1. orb t¢qt 4 t ii,,,, ,- .� �, a 'Q:.' ^C CF��II.i,'+rnY@:.f••i��t* ,}' ! ,pfF 1 1 S Fy,l v1�,�1 Fp.1 f �+z xt� Wl-5 �. ( �+�';" l i-yt `'''Yt.:: d's ',kv.3t�,t•H) ,r `.R',.l R,' ar r� J� ;.,; } F. e s,. A F1, 1 ry�'� Y„lbvx �n.t�,th� :S c'•�,cF r`n �F. . • .,ry ',, �';1,, tV.-:,'.- N ,,v ssIf';',.1-. . :,11-0 1 v14` ,,f`•'•4 nS{., i•. 3 1 . {lre0. 't0 A 1-4 t.li r ,(r5. I 1 n t,i t rky �' �� 7'a., nttC Pin qq `,±+'rqq'F,: vi r2r',ii r 'F ;� a f .tl �, .; ',�Y �,t, '� •� •3�'($s�, t.t,�, i' 'OFica' ' r. fkf;' 's F''.i. "' y t;. ,� .i. y •+,,:-b tu.'r ' a ..". -ilip�tr'`v'C' „S•i; '� 4;',.Mr;at% 3'r a p-'s i, "�. J' � x %;•; k 10; a M `lv„ i M�7 ,, -;`rSV,W�S� k 1 �1. . , °'�Y;y� t r � y7}'.`„j� •tyBz;1:i: �45'' ,vo1 tVLF b t A f•L ti +�k+ •' �t4'F,, 5 '.4�7.r K�. S- y .l"A �.Gr t, yj '� °aayy�� A Y: •, � i 0.,, `f;l,"�i11'"�1�"' .07.tr,INVI:;44, 1•?i!.. . ift, 4':,-k.1; �. "ig' 3. ,. 1• kL ;4,4,.. r MAC''':-S` �A'''''� 4,1c(}' : 'Sl { ;t,nt"�' R ,.� d+ :;'t :Hr.^ lr.",�f L"'S�{itf��• �,4 � f!`t >^''.� �� 1'!1 �iik�� I�'t, ,zx�g tY�ti,r�� ti,' •C.:SF,•t:y�`4S;tf ,•'. ''i t'•'t:,FZSji+i t;+.e K ' , •N.' t, /J+ '.,.a t;L.4^:,011.'.i} .tfroil, 'Atk,��,'�t��l ) /• r.Y S` ' - ' '• .• , :.y' ,+ s c,. ryn,. l: ,t bt .c,,,, w;' ft , pG, N S:s,i}',''L',r rj;i 4, .':SC:f'4 ,1rt,,l , it, lib' ' t"1,ttr i is R•Yl•s. 9r� ",, �a^t.a 1 / '-e .'.. �/�.� '} , >t '"G!6 t "{ ^3K,f f•""' .41{i<r,'} {Z $L".`.}•=t; •`1�� Wit'�t ti.A. 'r' , \i? ,4' }tr'. ' 6 ' tq t�/ • / M1 ,ply �`./�Gr Sij{f -tJ�'r • t}R'tt��5��0� .i FRS' t�'/y,' tl."e. �v ll=�`1f; �"1 t tSi \ • 5T,' s r A"+•'TE'c„ t i -.' as^ :S<w,s .- - i. s, ,'ft• ' -,t� -,i.e r�,71��R•w. Z' 'ZR S'l '''° + �e/4 7'/ 't' .1 s 'V' 1�;1'01,c;.1 •1"£r .if k 1kM. ./. av ` F•1/1{ST. 4 /• • rlS j! �i �'r Ph w / 1 i'wl��}kp{ �j �{f dl I9 .¢ {,, v ,• . . : .t'"e`a. �. ., } t`.•.4,,4 , Y.1 tie • , n x�5t t� ` }. `,ltc .`fir. <�` �1/J• �jff. � i , k` '' ¢Jn/'t ',"{1e ter v'.r�` 4.i `' 157 .�� y,'t�1�T. !),t r eN r . •• .'� AY l. M s• �5F•'iG:r7 . r 1I Xt. �.+ .1 ,�• i\. y5�, �'7f'S,Sil •?. `. Y •J�� ' • ;, �tr'.r, . }, ... . ' \ ,;5'it t ',Tie IS /•.i. � ' �i l"4+,1,y .o r, • S • ry� J „>.• • l,a ', ';` A $E .' F,4 ~C�,f a, it e15) a' t tt. p f tT t C 4' ,, .t�f7„3,1 74. �.j, •tE;, ti, x rs`, +,F pl,,.y.�sS'ad �. 1,10 w y Sky w,', ,.Y r.,s `5 f L 1pt�1 ' '+ah: '',,.•_ ,'.� �Q E'�� :eyH=* :11E:--;,, �',sso RSFr3 ^):'tiT `Y~ -VSb'P.1 T4Srill J'SAt ��1 Ii < ST " 4tt `y� J1�� T ��t(1/ ` r1/�,)i . :r.". 't ...vza','to ,\f' ,,�ri, S'i F0 1 W OODi+2 E' L' °i� .� /$ w • 's� .1 ' •�?6�; J' d'160TH -'----I•^ . "t`77 • W �• ' T AAA } ' ' ,¢ ST ST 9 'SE'W'161 T ST SE.'160T}.P1-' fx sE 159� h . � 62ND a� c $T �,® 16151 ;s9G�e ,.a •:g • a y �yt _ _ --,r- 4,'A'S ,1siA. e.SE 160TH 4�, t. M ��.. .Q •� t{.... .i SE V'163.1 SI ii • ,• 1 Jr , 9'• 1.St ' '' g ' x• SE 163RD ST.., o N ' k' < t . .1 2 1sT ,' - li { �, SE, 1r4TH ~ ST SE 164Th ,�I, ., t m�( y , v, 9G, 6 p �' r^'"0/sre rsT to '. ST a '.•,5 v �'" ^1a'. 'r'� .7 c :E f.1 .. SE 72 ~ - y SL 165TH .t °>3 S, 165TH '.sT.' S',sE SE 165i _s SE ~ 164TH, ' S _ sT 6�� , • _ C St Ar 1 6,` ' SE Sr- - r `- S ,. o T T. ,. �� a .N ST 1f6TH f z�rH sr. < •• ;wl ._p 3. ,ti,s;A 0'"5'_°, s FAIRWOOn _ .;` - •VICINITY MAP.' ' ' . LIU & ASSO.CIATES� INC. PROPOSED SHOPPING MALL' , NE 4TH'.STREET.AND UNION AVENUE. NE `- ,Geotechnical Engineering Engineering Geology,`•Earth Science' ' . . , - RENTON,'WASHINGTON - . JOB NO.',: •7022 : ' DATE 1/27/97 PLATE, 1 ' .• 3h,tlA' .. d30 ,111.3 a00 NV .. ' -r -:„ ';r :• • IM.N3 411.3 N803.0NV_' Sr ,1Ntla0AH .-7 •e-HWS_S.. • _ - - � - • -. ealM'•I lONIH V S M '3l • I 1L S' SSE, - Afl t_ !3l0' N 1 a'm ki la � 1Ntla-�I 3 AB aA 3a3H I' 3n N - �•" li... - I a3mod •.a e a= I _ 3.ltlM BO. ,to�nans �,., ilAa1. r -a3,,vv�A,�� }:' io e lYM' .,.�:: `• 1.:w- .k:' '`�r� .R'! • e-cf. q-1'-'-�-...•___.. ....-,r,. c1011 , ' Y .,.�yal...i, � ,� ':Z': S'LS r ' ,• it:' r,+� • .f el 1 :: '''''.::::.':'•." -41614/44'"'•''''• '"':"''''• f";•'' '''''. Y f� 'l .4,�Y •RS • y, l ?1, ♦ i _.f il: , 1_ • Y.: ti� �� .��L`V�yv� a• ;v, �`'. ..i ►NIS � l++h - :K 6'0 'r+ - :4 --- - s,,,titt, "t131 w��r o ,.-i� M'1 - 11 '.r 0-1 • 53niv - • �43n. k� `�t r - a31VM f t y'. b 2 _c '''-'-'0-,g.VP':"...--2.-,',;..-_-„•:----. --.-*L.:2::•_-Li-,..:.i..r,_...L..:..•',-.-.': -. •:'-'Ant %-• -.sr • O-o sr M'.a 0 0.6- „9 8c 'a N: - - - s -•=�:' -- -�.:�-Ef}kf �B " -- - -- - - .96O1Z =M�90.90. 8 �._ 1-'- was - N3dJ ,.. aim s z �/ Bo Od 000f+9 - 'ON ` '\ XN NItlFI - `3l 3a a N3W 3 '1 stl3, l� I� r I ONtl` w• o oa= �, • MO)l ,p- - I- L BOZO _04 - Il -!1 03 a ad' •r 33 \ Stl3 •3 b' • `.SIII l d` 31 Iln' - i ONtl • i� Otl0 a 1;: �>a3mod dT 1� a M I . 1r- 3 0 , r'- '1 r ir j 1 - :, -� - - I -, _ NIO,n , , - r - N I' 1: I�Nus x - 1 • '1 .11 1 - , :a no: 1f N'•� Ti ON O - fi s : W / \ - Hl'� r��o Ir� l L_ �'� r J I rr�- `S 1A3a� -01°.'SS3��b'` :.,/: c >a 'iNo>d �., -. •'. : 'a - M Boa' 3a �, a3�' • NMO - . �a 1' - `I rr. Y, w , lll;- c : G?: 30 13 3N39 m° a43_ 34tr 5 1 S3 0_ a3 32)ONI - 0 SS Z' - 1' - o- i•, I -< l' I N - � C N• , 1/ {IF _ 1� _ • i•. o ..i o` - -J. 40 ar' N - r` ' `0. 3 - J' 1N3W R• { :� '3N OH �r dal N 31 13N l C N r Od� tl",- t - �m 0 II - _ - 1 I am 3 0 I d, 1' `'�:,}�'::;�.' b — Z • o o, O �1 ti' Z Y,� II' m _ '0 ` - rn' • • - , z- O'.W' .. la 1" Z Xry. �f c r' :Oi• - „Sal _ �1 t' a m: `'D Q 01 A n 1. .'F - O N O' - - a3a� / O W - 3 MS>, JI - - ..,0-. do• "" - •ezr i a; - - I' rn - •Ns" • , tae-m CVO- - I _ 'm. - atl9 1`0 e Z. v '/ I ,z z of — ff • o • A , ,u / - 1 £0_ r , , :�J{,; , -j1 YI •nnI _ - -o: '�orn uo'� 3 d 1l NJ3W VStll 3- 1t rn I11 I C•1L' t p ' - , • .z . 1' ` / �_ L I / v `n I1, . L S I / NaOo; - - 1 x - _ £ 1 nn 3 NOW.11 3 e' 1�l l• - N - " I` F "313N0 00 Y IJ 1 I,9 ( atln' AdSd 0 tl aVON N I i 1S I S0' S S Va 11 tl N 0 x _ H N s atlrl, n 0 d' N •r'��60' - '�. - 1 NOW '%• 'n „38 r% �' dl0•r •313a0N00.,9 tl NO•(ONIx2NW , ,... NV1S x510' �-l ) Sstlaa:, _ _ _ _ ,£ tl No HVW H �' — 0- - j` _ - r 1, -'-� , 0't 0 6 _ 4, ,90 1- - .s 8 A. / I : - .3asi-30N x '.H Seal ,L r • - r tea'' J - 1 'r , . • N • `I• W 1 - M :1. --1� .::,,,,.:...,..... .,, :,: •:• •_ .1 C 'N • .c- v 4i1rv� 1 — Y. w o Yam,. L 1 till a la id r ; r . J30 3-' - nn71.r 13 on N N� I/ -ON I• •- - 1 321 - I l' lO:U7 L6 0 3 — n - - ••3NN-' - ---- 1 3x'N n Ot !'1 3 NOW N oal.!sr V ,1 3W NON I'I•- •• ISOd 3Ha0NO3 r ` •_:�: t• .r r No.'Nla-ssdae _ r• - 7 • 9'08Z - _ - _ i - �C. I,Y N 1 -r�' 0 HON � nd..tl r ONd �ti9•, i" 0£� ,3 � , 10.68 1 S:,/.. 1" a_+aa'a3latlno iv3 1' _ . .. -_ r>., .r. ,, '. .., '.(L a3N - ., �' / - `1 's •- a3doad ltl 1N3 nN L�:r 'r, ., '' c 13aoN ,tl. 0' I �'r.�.9. ON M /_ Ji. a( tllI' � r ' i9o'datl - d•02111 - •,!:ONtl 1S X r SIO S SV21 \ tl N XaVW \"HONn d 0 N! '•/ 3 1 ��e O OM ONI I e`� �' o •'ti - - • ONt 1 - t' !s x 3 I' L Ol( / a'N• 3 a0 - - :Jll x. - M- a3 d0ad d0.'S .0'0 - .l .Z'0 =�- , .r • ''a3HSYL1 0 - _ •f. '� c,� tvz 1,:: • - _ - - S TES� - _ I ND�:A E XP L ORATI ON:�- - L OCA- TI N - O PLAN LIU:: SS•OyT E'• - S P - ROP INC. INC:� _ OSED.r ��. -- - � SH.OPPING=MALL::' - - .NE: - , . 4T�H TR S EE''TA ND�UNI ON�A._ . VENUE NE' Geotechnical.Engineering: Engineerin• Geolo ,• Earth-Science "9 9Y1. ';RENTON,.WASHINGTON'.' :;JOB NO 7.' 2' DATE,. . ;1127/97 'PLATE •2 - . .'• ;UNIFIED; SOIL- CLASSIFICATION .SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS' .. 'GROUP' GROUP .NAME SYMBOL .. . GRAVEL ' ' .' CLEAN": • GW' WELL-GRADED GRAVEL;FINETO COARSE GRAVEL COARSE- ' • - MORE THAN 5096 OF, • GRAVEL • GP' _POORLY-GRADED,GRAVEL GRAINED` COARSE FRACTION': GRAVEL WITH GM SILTY'GRAVEL SOILS RETAINED'ON NO.4 SIEVE • ••FINES GC'.' CLAYEY GRAVEL. • - - " SAND: CLEAN ' 'SW• -WELL-GRADED SAND;FINE TO COARSE SAND: •MORE THAN 50%" •MORE•THAN-50%OF. • SAND 'SP. •POORLY-GRADED SAND • RETAINED ON THE COARSE FRACTION. SAND WITH. ' SM ',, SILTY SAND ' NO.-200 SIEVE PASSING N,O.4 SIEVE ' ' FINES SC` . ;CLAYEY AND - ',FINE- •-SILT .CL ANDAY- :INORGANIC ML •SILT GRAINED • LIQUI�:LIMlr... • CL cLAY SOILS, - .LESS.THAN 5096, • ORGANIC ' OL ORGANIC SILT,ORGANIC CLA•Y' . • MORE THAN 50% . SILTY AND'CLAY -.INORGANIC .'MH SILT OF.HIGH PLASTICITY,ELASTIC SILT" PASSING ON',THE ,. , LIQUID LIMIT '. CH': • CLAY OF HIGH-PLASTIC,ITY;,FAT CLAY. • NO.200SIEVE 56%OR MORE " • Y• _ ORGANIC O.H ORGANIC SILT,ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS ;PT'.T,` ND;OTHER PEAT A 'HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS:. t. FIELD CLASSIFICATION IS BASED ON VISUAL EXAMINATION - DRY-ABSENCE'OF MOISTURE,DUSTY;DRY TO• -• - OF SOIL IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2488-83: THE TOUCH;`. • _ 2: SOIL CLASSIFICATION.USING LABORATORY TESTSIS BASED , SLIGHTLY MOIST-TRACE MOISTURE`NOT DUSTY • ON'ASTM D2487-83.' • , - MOIST-DAMP,•BUT NO.VISIBLE WATER ''. - '. .3..DESCRIPTIONS OFSOIL:DENSITY,OR CONSISTENCY ARE • VERY MOIST-VERY.DAMP,MOISTURE FELT.TO THE TOUCH • BASED'ON'INTERPRETATION OF.BLOW-COUNT.DATA,VISUAL . WET VISIBLE FREE'WATER OR SATURATED, • APPEARANCE.OF`SOILS,,AND/OR TEST DATA. USU•ALLY SOIL IS OBTAINED.FROM BELOW.', WATER TABLE • • ' ,LIU'.& '••ASSOCIATES_ UNIFIED:SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Geotechnical Engineering Engineering Geology Earth.Science. • • - PLATE 3., ; r' I , ' TEST PIT NO:, 1; Logged By:;:.WLB. Date Excavated: 1/29/97 ;:Ground El: 396.0' t' Depth' USC.S Sample w _ . ' Other ft. CLASS. - Soil .Description' No.'. % Test'.. • OL Duff over topsoil and roots. .. _ SM Orange-brown, moist; loose;silty fine SAND. with trace: ` . • 2 ' grave .(weathered ABLATION DRIFT)l' - SM, Grey-brown'mottled,'moist;medium=dense; silty SAND 4 :with gravel (weathered GLACIAL TILL);' ' i. 5 SM *Grey,,moist've dense, Slightly-siltySAND:with' ravel : ' _ � !Y' 9 (unweathered GLACIAL TILL) ; 6 _ Test pit:terminated at 5.5 ft; perched groundwater seepage ,; 7 encountered,© 3.7-3.9,ft: TEST PIT; NO. . 2 Logged-By`. WLB Date Excavated: 1/29/97 Ground EI. 404.0' ± D_epth USCS" .. . Sample W: Othe`r ft. ;cLAss Soil Description • No.. ak Test 1 SM: Dark brown, very moist; loose, silty SAND,with abundant _ . large'roots(FILL) , 3_ SM_ 'Brown.with grey patches,-moist, medium-dense.to dense;. silty,fine:'SAND with gravel 4_ 7 ` .SM-: Grey, moist; very dense, silty SAND with gravel, , . ;,silty fine SANDrwith gravel (unweathered GLACIAL TILL). • I T est pit terminated at 8.0,ft;groundwater not encountered: — TEST- "PIT, LOGS 1. LIU'84 ASSOCIAT'ES' INC. PROPOSED SHOPPING MALL i r NE°'4TH STREET AND UNION AVENUE' NE' Geotechnical Engineering:.Engineering Geology Earth.Science • RENTON;'WASHINGTON JOB NO. ,_ :7022 DATE •2/10/97. PLATE 4 • TEST. PIT .NO., 3 Logged By: WLB Date Excavated . ,1/29/97, Ground El. 377.0' t Depth USCS Sample W Other ft. : CLASS. Soil Description. No. ` % '..Test OL Duff over'topsoiland-roots t._ •2 SM,'_ Oran ge-brown, moist, loose, silty SAND-with gravel. and occasional cobble (weathered ABLATION DRIFT) _ SM Grey-brown mottled, moist, dense, silty SAND with,gravel s_ and occasional cobble (weathered GLACIAL,TILL) .' SM. Grey,'moist, very dense, slightly silty SAND with gravel (unweathered GLACIAL TILL) " _ _ Test pit terminated at 7.5 ft; groundwater not encountered. , s _ ' , Logged By: JSL • Date Excavated: `. 1/29/97 Ground El: 382.0' ± Depth USCS '.. • Sample W Other ft. CLASS. Soil ' Description. . ;, No. % t Test" - OL Duff over topsoil and roots . SM ` Brown, very moist, loose to medium-dense, silty SAND 2 with scattered,gravel (weathered.ABLATION DRIFT), 4 SM. Grey, moist, dense, fine to,medium.SAND-withsilt'and ; ' : ' 6_ scattered.gravel (GLACIAL DRIFT) • 6 . SM Grey,'moist; very dense, silty SAND with':gravel , • 8 silty fine SAND with gravel (unweathered GLACIAL TILL) -. , 9 . . Test,pit terminated at 8.5 ft; groundwater not encountered. TEST PIT LOGS. • LIU &:ASSOCIATES, INC. = PROPOSED'SHOPPING MALL '' • • NE"4TH-STREET"AND UNION AVENUE NE Geotechnical Engineering,Engineering Geology'•,Earth Science RENTON, WASHINGTON • , JOB NO. 7022 DATE' 2/10/97 PLATE 5 TEST PIT NO. 5' Logged By: WLB ,• Date_Excavated: 1/29/97 Ground El. 399.0' t Depth USCS , Sample W Other ft. CLASS. ' • Soil Description , - . • No: %o , Test OL Duff over topsoil and roots _ - 1 SM Orange-brown, very moist; medium-dense,-silty SAND with scatteredgravel"(weathered ABLATION-DRIFT) _ • 2_ 3'_ SM Grey-brown, very moist, medium dense, silty SAND 4- with gravel (weathered GLACIAL TILL) - • • SM- Grey, moist, very dense, slightly silty SAND.with gravel• 6_ ' and-cobble (unweathered.GLACIAL DRIFT) • - Digs hard beyond•5.0 ft:; . 7 s — Test pit terminated at 7.0 ft;,groundwater not.encountered. • TEST PIT NO. 6 Logged-By:. WLB • Date Excavated: 1/29/97 Ground El. 412:0' Depth USCS = Sample W Other , : ` ft. CLASS: Soil •Description- No. % Test OL Duff over topsoil and roots • SM Orange-brown, very moist, loose, silty SAND with gravel ' 2 and roots to 2 ft'(weathered_ABLATION DRIFT) 3 SM Grey-brown mottled, moist, medium-dense to dense, — , — silty SAND'with gravel:(unweathered GLACIAL DRIFT), /� 4 1 5 SM Grey,'moist, very dense,slightly silty SAND with: • ' • trace gravel:(unweathered GLACIAL TILL) ' • s_ s= s - Same, but grades more'gravelly, waterbearing:seam 10_ caved 9.5- 10.5 ft. 12 14 Test pit terminated at 13:0 ft;'berched roundwater.CW 9.5 ft: • - TEST PIT. LOGS LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. r PROPOSED SHOPPING MALL NE 4TH STREET.AND UNION AVENUE' NE Geotechnical Engineering.•Enginee ing Geology•Earth Science - - RENTON, WASHINGTON ' JOB NO. 7022" DATE. 2/10/97 PLATE 6 ; • TEST - PIT •'NO. " 7,, Logged By 1NLB" Date Excavated: 1/29/97 Ground EL 407.0' ± Depth USCS. Sample • W, Other • ft: CLASS. Soil Description., ;No. %a; Test OL•Duff over topsoil and.roots ' - 1- 27 Orange-brown,.moist, loose to medium=dense; silty SAND, -A.with gravel (weathered ABLATION,DRIFT). -' 3 . SM Grey-brown lightly mottled, very moist, dense, silty,SAND 4 with gravel (weathered GLACIAL TILL) 5 SM.• Grey, moist,very dense; silty SAND with gravel 6 (unweathered.GLACIAL TILL) ' s_ : ; Intermittent sandy zones cCD 7.5- 9.0 ft'digs hard'beyond 5.0 ft heavy groundwater seepage and sloughing of pit walls© 9.0 10:5 12_ 13 ; i4 - ' ' Test pit terminated at 13.2 ft; groundwater seepage 7.5-'10.5 ft. `' _ TEST PIT :NO. '8. Logged By;' .WLB: Date-Excavated: ,' 1/29/97 'Ground El.' '408.0' ± Depth USCS- , Sample, W Other ft. CLASS'.. Soil Description . ; No. % Test.'.. OL Duff over topsoil and roots 1 SM- range-Grown;very.moist1oose;;siity-SAND with gravel, 7, and roots to 2 ft.(weathered,ABLATION DRIFT). . - 2 SM,. Grey-brown mottled, very-moist, medium-dense to dense, t 3 ;- silty SAND with gravel•(unweathered.GLACIAL TILL) , 4 .5:- SM Grey, moist to wet, very dense,slightly silty SAND with -trace gravel' (unweathered GLACIAL TILL) " 6_ —" Heavy groundwater seepage and sloughing of pit walls ' -. , e_ @ 9:0 ft; sloughing beyond 7:5 ft. 10i 1 • Test.Dit terminated at 10.5 ft:-berched aroundwater'0 7.5 ft., .• TEST PIT,' LOGS ; • LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. -PROPOSED SHOPPING MALL NE 4TH STREET AND"UNION AVENUE`NE Geotechnical Engineering Engiineering'.Geology'•Earth Science RENTON,•WASHI NGTON JOB.NO 7022 . , ;DATE 2/10/97 I .PLATE_ 7 . 4 : , , ' TEST PIT NO. , 9 . . Logged By: . WLB Date Excavated::. .1/29/97 • 1'Ground,El. ::400.0''t, "' Depth• USCS, Sample. W Other'. , ft. 'CLASS. Soil Description • ,No. . %- ,'Test ' OL 'Duff over topsoil and roots SM Orange-brown, very moist to wet;,loose,'silty SAND:with 2._ gravel (weathered ABLATION DRIFT) ' ' - Heavy groundwater seepage @ 2.0,ft.. ' -- 3 SM Grey-brown mottled, wet`, medium-.dense, silty SAND with gravel (weathered GLACIALTILL) a SM,; Grey-brown mottled, wet, very dense, slightly silty SAND; with gravel (unweathered GLACIAL TILL) ',:. 5 _ " ' 6 Test pit terminated fat 4.5 ft; groundwater seepage @ 2.0 ft. - , ; 7' TEST PIT NO.: 10 Logged By: ;WLB ' , Date'Excavated; ;.1/29/97 '„ Ground El. 395.0' ±-` ;Depth - USCS - Sample w -;Other `ft. : CASs: Soil Description, No. %. . •-Test OL Duff over topsoil and roots SM Brown, very moist, loose, silty SAND with_gravel, 2 (weathered ABLATION DRIFT) 3 SM Grey-brown mottled, moist,-medium-dense,silty SAND - with gravel-(weathered GLACIAL TILL). ; 4 - _ SM Grey, moist, very dense,'slightly silty SAND•with gravel :• ` , 6= (unweathered GLACIAL TILL) s . y 9— 10 11. • Test pit terminated at."10.0 ft; groundwater not encountered: :TEST- PIT. LOGS LIU"& ASSOCIATES,'INC. PROPOSED SHOPPING MALL ' ; NE 4TH STREET AND UNION AVENUE NE 'Geotechnicai Engineering:Engineering Geology;Earth Science • RENTON,.WAS,HINGTON ' ' JOB NO: 7022 I DATE 2/10/97;I PLATE ; 8 • p: i I Logged By: :WLB • .. ',pate Excavated: 1/29/97 : '•Ground'El. ' '396.0' f : I Depth USCS:, . : • • Sample - ."W: Other - i, tt... . CLASS: : Soil Description . . ,. .,No.: ' .• %- , '... 'Test . '''' = OL, - . Duff over topsoil'and roots. -._ " :. -. 2' •SM -Oran e-brown moist to`wet loose to medl - e'. - i � g. tim d nse„ !: silty:SAND:with gravel_:(weathered ABLATION-DRIFT).;' , '- C -3— ' .., -Heav roundwatersee a e 4:0 ft: .• • - • ' SM' : Grey-brown:mottled,wet,dense,'silty;SAND,with gravel - ` s_ (weathered GLACIAL'TILL): - _ , . .• .i 1 - 8 :.SM Grey,:moist; very dense,slightly.silty.SAND with gravel, - - .= - . _ (unweathered GLACIAL TILL) - : . 9^ Digs:hard'beyond 7:0 ft. " io :Test pit terminated-at9'.0 ft;groundwater seepage,and.caving.ct"D 4.0 ft:' . : - ... - TEST'. PIT NO. 12 i . _ - : " Logged,By:.:: JSL . . " ',Date Excavated:,' 1/29/97,.: ,Ground'El. 404:0'•t' 1 Depth USgs` ' ,� , Sample t.'W Other... e) „ ,,. ft. . .. CLASS: . . , ` . Soil .Description'• .. '.No:" •:% '•, test'-''.:.:. - • ,- OL - ;D.uff'over topsoil and'roots: - - - - . 2, SM :Orange'brown, moist-to wet,"loose, silty SAND _ c' with'gravel (weathered ABLATION DRIFT) . " - . ' . ; -,; SM .Grey-brown mottled,.very;moist, medium-dense, . _ ' , . 4. - SM silty SAND'with.gravel:(weathered,GLACIAL.TILL) - - .Grey,.moist, dense to''very,dense,'•silty'SAND:with gravel` . _ - 5-.' - ' (unweathered GLACIAL TILL) . - . . ' s -- - ' .- Test pit terminated'at•4.0ft; groundwater not encountered:' - 7_ . +. - , ` TEST`'PIT; LOGS : - ' ':LIU & ASSOCIATES;-INC. ' ' "PROPOSEDSHOPPING MALL NE 4TH STREET AND UNION AVENUE NE ' • 1 Geotechnical Engineering-Engineering Geology Earth Science 'RENTON,;WASHINGTON= JOB'NO. 7022 DATE 2/1,0/97 `PLATE" 9 . I ! 1. • 'TEST r PIT NO Logged By:. WLB.:- , • Date Excavated: 3/3/97 • Ground,El: 394.0' t. • Depth USGS Sample w Other ft. CLASS: Soil Description ' No: '/o Test OL r •:Duff over topsoil and roots — - 'SM Orange-brown, moist, loose,to medium-dense, silty fine 2 SAND with scattered gravel (weathered ABLATION DRIFT) 3 " SM' Grey-brown;moist,medium-dense,=silty fine SAND - 4 with gravel (weathered GLACIAL TILL) - SM Grey, moist,'very dense, silty fine-SAND_with gravel •= 5 7 (unweathered`GLACIAL TILL) , s.1 , Test pit terminated at'5.,0 ft; groundwater not encountered. 7 —A . TEST PIT NO. 1.4. Logged By: WLB Date Excavated:'; 3/3/97 Ground .398.0' ± Depth- USCS ' . Sample .w Other' ft. -CLASS. . Soil ;Description - - No. • % Test ,, — ML ,Bark brown', moist, loose, sandy_SILT(FILL) 1 - 2 Orange-brown; slightly moist, loose to medium-dense, silty �-- SM SAND with scattered gravel,r(weathered ABLATION`DRIFT). - 3- --1Gre:y-brown, moist, medium-dense, silty SAND with gravel SM.' (weathered GLACIAL TILL) . 4 SM : Grey;slightly,moist, very dense, silty,SAND w ith gravel \'(unweathered`GLACIAL TILL) ' Test pit terminated at.4.0 ft;,groundwater not encountered. s. • Jt s t0 n - TEST 'PIT'. LOGS LIU & ASSOCIATES INC. : PROPOSED-SHOPPING MALL , , NE 4TH STREET AND UNION AVENUE NE ' Geotechnical Engineering Engineering Geology•Earth Science RENTON, WASHINGTON JOB NO. 7022 I DATE 3/10/97,I'PLATE. 10 TEST PIT NO., 16, Logged By' WLB Date Excavated: • 3/397 Ground El 396:0' t Depth USCS' Sample w; Other CLASS. Soil 'Descript ft. IOn No. . '%- Test . . . • _ OL'-1 Duff over topsoil and roots,trace fill • _ SM Orange-brown, moist, loose to medium-dense, silty fine 2 , •SAND Withscattered gravel (weathered ABLATION DRIFT) . 3 SM Grey-brown, moist, medium-dense,silty SAND with gravel .:' • (weathered GLACIAL TILL) SM Grey-brown mottled;wet, dense,silty'SAND'.with gravel _ 5 (weathered GLACIAL TILL) , ' • _ ' Test pit,terminated-at'5.2 ft; groundwater not encountered. ;. • 7_ ; • TEST ;,PIT NO:. 16 , • Logged By JSL: :Date Excavated: 3/3/97 :Ground'El.' 395.5';t Depth , USCS Sample - W Other ft: CLASS. Soil ;Description;.-• No._• %." 'Test .,, SM Grey-brown loose to medium dense, silty SAND with • gravel and scattered debris,(FILL) , , 2, • __ /1Black,"loose,•sandy•SILT with abundant debris.(oil cans,` ;SM ' -'filters,asserted automotive litter, 4-to-61inch layer of soil 3'— has fuel odor(FI,LL) ' SM Grey, slightly moist, very dense, silty SAND with gravel f.. 4 = \(unweathered GLACIAL TILL) 5 Test pit terminated at 3.5 ft; groundwater-not,encountered. I , 7, ; , TEST .PIT LOGS : LIU.&ASSOCIATES, INC. • PROPOSED SHOPPING,MALL NE 4TH STREET AND UNION AVENUE NE • ' Geotechnical Engineering.Engineering Geology•Earth Science RENTON, WASHINGTON JOB NO. , 7022` . DATE 3/10/97'I-PLATE' " 11 • TEST. PI'T 'NO: ' 17.: • 'Logged By: WLB . ;.Date.:Excavated:'w: 3/9/97 Ground El" .392:0'" t_ • Depth` .USCS; . - Sample W. Other.' j• tt.• • cuss. _ • Soil' Description . No..'-'• % , :Test' '•-_; • " "Dark brown;,moist,"medium dense:silty SAND" •'• •" - . SM, (MODIFIED;GROUND) • SM Orange-brown;',moist,loose to medium=dense; silty SAND 2. ..with Scattered gravel and-roots(weathered ABLATION DRIFT) . SM,: • Grey brown, moist;'medium-dense, silty"fine•SAND ` 3 -" with gravel (weathered GLACIAL TILL) a' ; : :SM Grey, moist,very dense,silty fine:SAND with gravel' _ - ` (unweathered,GLACIAL•TILL) .' 5 ' `' Test pit terminated at 5.0 ft;"groundwater not encountered,' _ s= 7 . TEST PIT NO: , - • ',Logged B.y:. Date:Excavated:` : Ground EI p.h mplw`, Oth r' -ft. CLASS., • Soil Description•. • No: % Te'st • , • -• 5— - I 7_ • 11' ` - k. : TEST PIT:,'LOGS' • LIU.& ASSOCIATES,INC: .-PROPOSED:SHOPPING MALL " =. .' NE 4TH-STREET AND UNION AVENUE'"NE- , Geotechnical Engineering••Engineering Geology.;'Earth,Science RENTON; WASHINGTON;' .: :.';' JOB NO. 7022''. I DATE',3/1.0/97 I PLATE