Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA97-035
iiiiiiii 1 ;1'4 !!!! I 114., , A 1. ' 1::/ 7 P 1 x 1 i . "e4E oAlp! .11 , l Ali il q . hr. ± • i hb00hah h1 I. ro 1 1 ' ii3ii ! 1 r i _lit .. • g 4 , L•�onmws.� PL M .1 A ioir7t.. '. III I aI • .PF W`'" .N��T�.��1r� L ifria-��►r� I l � / ii....... :.,....it plaiu k 11411 /11 II . I ' 1 a ;q : • : Ia. ilj 7.1: I 11 i C N i i 1 a 1:5.II • . q5�� ft �F��y po ec . -� r1 � ;j— 2 , 3s' c c L : gg. -%�1 ,moo - i1 • Q Illeilo t !e-_4 iiii till /2�� g5113 II NLmz i. 1F ' 1 14.,E Q' 'o�;` , I , I` IMP 1 IIII tllf I7 i i 111 l$P it P& 17. i Bpi II 11 } ' f 1 [ t sI/ q.ei 11 Il` "ill•1. i ` (S t[ If Itii 4 I it 1 l ill e_ 1PL`1" ° IIt lit LR 1. F a 4ill P IP " d" lift P l � � � x x r` it 'd[r II li g 1 i 4 li 4 a 1 441 1•'k 1111 Q l i ° ° it ill 1 i B lilk l lII fill r i f pp4 lli P a '14 Q 1 l an P !II alF I d l ;i; S 4' r ' R8 P A �r � PP l Py l7 IIIII Lsa l6pI FL ��'�' 4� L4lPLLL ! � 7LI{ {s 11i11d .R1 If �L 11 I I 1 o�Pd It d1rq PI L5 [ 4lP i � . i � � ` dtf� Lr �P l t� L� ���i� ( � � 4 ��0 `� ��� ililt eI 4 tteil{L }Lif' 4 '# 1 Pre n Ili. l I Cl l ilti a7L i,l Ft xc 1 qa 9l l 1et1Q 1 q II Oil iP:l !l� L l ! El-"R I Ili i i 4 -1 Ilh t F I ii s l 4 4 d e t PF p P , l Orli IiLPa � a � 4�r �°�" 1 Il �L'� � l � L l +�PSg1�Lr rSt Qr3P 4 ` Pei ii i. }L qBZ. L . �a a Ii y°lYI4 IfI •s II t[ t f Il r 6l 'I 4P- II l .LQsi � .f � -Ii1P1t� � Lf lig II .tQirill I ill li 12 fK P 11r1L g Ii /i 11' 1111 L P [r y7 Y r 0 hir;11 L I 11 S f hi 4 S 'Q l 4 .0 as a .i4 �i PUP I i 1 6L R t1 i 1 Pa P i L 1 L i d fit f. ll 1 all ��4 a L , 1 {� Pe 4 t P� Q l �F�•L�L� P tl` [ all P �P 1l 1 4 �'' L Si 1 i ( it i1 lB' 1 IPL R 11. B �it 0 r i d O P Il L ,. 11 F� I l ' [ lilli I Li' ? 11 y t Q l � II n l : " 1 r 1 I 6} iL � Pit: L � l � � 1111�L� � �1 ''i� F j I itiL� �r r II arQ �l } S�ril Sl I j° r : 111 R 1> I a1i 4 3 • a I 1 P . e el Pam' IP 1 l • i i /kr li i �I L 1� 4 SI 4 t OH if I Pi4lPe !Ili E i ;tit 11' II 44 i 0 i aim L t It Tell IIII 1 i I III IV II 11 I a 1 tigi 11 t it ' II it 11 Q t4 i 1 1 l 1 Mc CUNCY'S ADDInON Mc CLINCY'S RN PARNELL COMPANY 'I • n I a i GRADING-DRAINAGE-UTILITIES wa NE.TN eiRF.Er tars"'°""•p-`"""'"'"°"""'°"r"' o m.F mrown,otos= mma emmta.rux RENTON.WA M01. atn-�m�nllce R.rMalw�ru wn r ` M a mows=DWI nv wn w.ur ru:cromAw -('i$6=..CIP i".:^.1... pesO uzpq.1 Goss.Fcerna4.1 Uih wIv..-M1NeKNb'e7, Ric s •1. . 'i f/AI.1f0•�JfPIItY•IeU•.GlOIRr-.la1FIGNRo'Glrl 1a0 . ::+:A*+vM Ap _Mews/ f1ftIG. S4 iJ M•-•. haloeF rlatpAue '. 1?.e' .� II. 2ctcl0xtµ'• •yy ��^� • $G41TtoFy-511aw='... _i��w alewgodM (6cvineN)• :1299er_.: . ,,.. tl •, ►" ..-_in LPO�,mtF:Aillt r2.._:1921?o: - tea- 2903 �5m a 5.8 . Co ,V � I-I:GAL. *9G I lohl; _ _ eww•� +ca :�1343a' 1 9aF r O.so s 1 e ' - �"' -•.., w • 'I0>1di:A -7�48fd4 HIV ' 11'42 eft ". ._._.. -No.rlper oF1' ep-1•HE No H i]Dr-T• T148 • - f 1 11'PARTF1GNTs- OUNIT.'+C�IIh-- ��'R u-tT = 4.5 s 6 ,� rae 1 a� **nu 21Tr'cc'nit_pAeT-I N t' }�'}�{1E'bW 1 . i } c.' 1�:: . op-04e`9•e'1 ar 1-140 3W 34 arp eEGrIOJ 4201 . .. I-..SFAet6 12 '3pAce9 ,1�,• -. 1•• • gowN5+lp 2a liTu, KA149e. s 44e1",w.t.i. :u.pNd . G... ._._... _ ..'_• i a -/2f ,�fG�pr THAT pOpLTbN HBRpor G,�Ivt3ll:o To $17C.AFtiA: 1?*2?(1 Of Lo11P�flrA...• 11 �l yJP4 'COUNTY PoK"� 12 � �N.C:4+� s'� ptr?1'o w ArvIrct4: — 1' i. "P R AtteA•e"oe 105%10 urea AND p2apanc, coNar•' ... I - ^� -'I-•. ..•..:a;�..Ye A,pnOTSo:'SfbfipOM,RR'.T t�.0oR- ion SF 2A`A•Mop-- J r. .,.-t!tr- .1 -e9� • . ..BPXZETE1r'LWEwnexN11-tNftpyt- 8.64E-5/ MNN Ft31>v NAAGLI'ltit abWR1bA i• ,+..T,_ -,%`--_,.�-w. i•jaeTlNd 2r Bi eG . c', .:f.N` . !!F�4 -Am -17 5 . . -: • �/. i- I'Lt.351,eNerr.at,' 1-1-'1 • --r_.1 . ..._.. 1eeg sF Moe+st ' : �IveNOe :y;. :a. — c ‘• NapTN 1 i .-rAccoxD eAssmeNr ermee -r'la3 GP . • I A�� •..` I16, lam_ •fZt;TMIi Aye .pta?oeee AtNtnael+T140,Nu..Fmti d'CCGK0 1,616 4F seti.1 r. J v.744 P =SL.15fAt.'en6DIWs•F�t�M+t:• ERIsi11N6- iB72 a � 1 \ \\ .:Wormer?/4DDI11ON vy.DGNV 1896 s, . - - 1 w >9 s IY2.Fru : Rae sr .1!'♦A4KwAT '_ F.4111011 - •I 1 • _ fdbr•rw 1 .? O?► • Rag yl I ' eel _A UP p-� Fr1,1"f j+ d " :¢1 ooWP►bL: D..2100.a .'32.4% �euucwtwuNerw• •� . Ex19.PNti,xam aeRf.' ---_folke' ea r• i r,pr rikmer-Aide itrrre.tCA111t.Y'.eS67..WN of .. peta qr-FIrtSr tY, p . • .-t ;w5cAplN6;T�IRMJNe LoT 1NTtR1eR'S_'h1.,I: (�,t oruOR'ues+leoagl a` .1.11r i ytiw �/ _ I 1 fb_SGApft A�J":"100 eF MOWS,'- �`_ I f'x•ef1Ab GC • ••611tte Nre-.p• wrraq Sorr.pRePo?eo..se Fr - L D �- -2211'...nu- 1 i..-_ tr 21- ( i !�>;.r,.;,��.,...-.ts9"(+�+t!O:PpoFIT.J2r-91De O,_Q-,PeAR O. GW2 F n �_,#w co** uiilr� .. . I ...1. -tit♦V : 1D` g..a3Wrroar.�t�T e'L --__—. E r_ f.. R@w1W '11 n � �• 1.. _., . WM:NM.. I ,Ityett6NT tN 1Au,1?LStfi_ AND _ -' ew- - ----"_ - . F WSW•I'tWAtiD uirsmeT fe -N,mr.,4.pe.+0 ".._aro • 'Ntmtar4TRur l ef4 A 4604 so. 4r, ._• satee+IIMFANr-• t+Rlvewy _r M1e u. Ch•Wpm.lira) IN lee4 Wok evte p • .. • . t?gr. ,Neon�RW I�Of ea+ n r- '14 .-444•114:Er'r . • . -- ---- __._:._ . . (.'-..... . . 7.1+fricwr- . • • 1 I •I aaVltl2i-9uMP.:lb4 D 1 I V. 51TE - r 1-411 1419 to PT ! . e e#Tatt. ADpIrION f ALtE1ZATIO�Je to 0c1511N6, are =FX1biG LJybRtW1 -1141:6a.-" w1 •se-c. emu. M4GI�1hIG`(1°v o 4r O4 N}3 +1•+" �•�eE.r George W.Lucker,Architect. t • HYi hs . • .� .,,RfA� Cd.1veNIENGE 4r g te0e•MI 1..6 e.siop PA I1801 C.'. "1 1.,j?L. TEL 208 9/2•41/F FAX 20e e/24545 1 I'� • Ia,l•ror• e, ifil -=�= 4.- 11111�I11I IIII�1111IIII11I l' . • ' • • - a+.nn I�I III j ' fir r ICI E' • — Ri?rMt .�1a) •'isimiIIIIIBI-IJI,Jil91III IIIIIIIIIomom�IIIIIINIIni Raj 4., . . RIB I. - — laws gris raaaa+7� ••= 1 Ill R e1y • . ••• • 99fs ve /1 I� pcl6rMt__,_ —_, . • f QDPITIehI —.--� •I�.GIeL;�}IT�o fy (r iZia ` 'SIGFr��pnela Ixi{IIBV' ..... .WBg7 1 Lr,VATIo I IIII(IIIIIIIII OIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIUIUIUQIIUIUUI N ie'nl 9lmnuuunuunUlnnl(nng°; I ..� , • ` m I: It .. ... ....-- ., B�= �- ; iims NM,- ,nnn,,.,n,n '.. — _u_.�n.u�unu� -' �Ic,. 4+i�o, .-_- A06---milli I IIII=• IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I' IIIII II II • I Jlcy .4,0,2,Q 1. SOUTH - .mxvAtlo-N:. ..._14.'4-I1--o, b '� 11� m • . )`- ,-, __�...-.• — .. •_ 'NEW MMAL f� • 45•'19.A.`A- —'i __--. 1 ..—..-- I-� ..{. . I aaY. CA,11,1 f I,VI • P N 4B1.e' • I 4 • Iilllllllllllllllllllll11111111111111111 PT I I •iia ■ � LIl I . • . 1;1 , plice. • I --- - I CI o `— I 1a1 P4sG�2n• , v1 rou num 44MS -_4 4_____________ IMsIY . • Iweeoe..a9e.so :D)m d Pm:.rN.GwE 39a.so • �� _ —��M.�� SIG., I 'AN994.13 � eADI?ON --�A I_- ` —. � -----------------------4- pot pLEVArIoh" 4p'..1=o" � NorztH LE/1410 I 14r-11-on or blzsl94 . l t 1,_ _ . . 11 • 6.-?..) WI:5"51 ro . 12 - z4 IR - 24 HI 0 • ,... --, 1?; lc— ,..:.4- 4.041 e e t, s 0 0 • _______ Jiro, - cod.es.P .106.e. : ':. !,1 ' ... ,,,... .ea nrAwr 44.:A.1 0L`• 414 at - ...e.e.e. 1 ". e, 7 / b / . . , i ; • I(119 L...___.....(."4)-4 • — Li 44 1 0_5 I Lii, . ,C) it. • ..• .; !k 0! ... C 5 6 14 A. I. li.4. • , . : • • • ' 4,1,...P. • 02 : 4 1 . 3-5 6 11. • 4. 1 ..... e i .0,-e; .11.1 A/-• .4,C(Or t 3. II z• • . • Ili 1 Z i it . ... ..' .........., , - ..:,,tri • CI • ' ..11,a 6 i _ . co 1'4 18 • • col :;:,:•:,,,s, 4 • ll . PO III . - - t,, , 4II je. 'r: VOA I.' i,. .., ...,.....N::,:i • 0.6,,,. ..so. go A. (S) ;; .1.0 : • 0 0 CI ' • • c2 1 pa,- ..g... • .0---.. :.,:iw • • o i.....:,.._•,:,., . co l• ' cX., — . ... •NE A 517 v up (> , . 1(• • • :%.••• .,• .•••••—.1• . ..4'•'" . __4,...„,,Litz... . ..' ••Atti.r—a. ...,- r..___,;:„...... i •.4„,„ , . .p,.......164........._.; lc. • ...ry ,.,...... I(0 • • , -,44- '! f..6_4;.- '411 • i 1 ; i4 14 KCSPIOT9069 Z1 1 g A.F.8002040734 11 •. ! -..f..P 4 i. 4.,2 ; 1 `i 1 or 1 "I —I,5 .,,..- , — ..°„' ''.! __Alil — f f, • 1 11 t vt 1 J • 2- 1 1 t ? . ;1 ill . „,. % '2 I t II •• '.14‘; o- 11,di as t 4,0' 41 ,10.• .0 V I .s !! -• • 4-4.:.; ., „:.;..,iTio •• .... - _44.,,, .1 10 '1 p•; • e est, •,a--0 1 el , ," ,p74 C' _ft___v,,.!?:‘,j ..?.. I ......-.12:- ....—,.. ' 1 414‘ IP k.11 o • .REHTC)lit..00•RP. :LIM( 14, I. @ 13 - t. I N ‘" 'N : --'----•"-'''':"'"''...' • N1AKT 6 A 13,i'j. 1 , .1/4...,, , I. poi" 4 ' • .• Ii4 .4) I-- A6T4 LIN )..1-:0. fli• !Lori,.t..p.ji Lor 3 li .__....dyd_tt_.. 4: UGHBOR , A NW kit ,1 ,• r — 4 i.., /6•2 S.g 1 HOOD MAP • 12•Pi 701-1 6,ize Lim) 7 II I .,. LOr I i 0 `'•". 1.* .4'. 4'h • ' 1.'69 '.: 4.6A1.-E 1 1!sick =loci 1'e r: ...--.-... ....-,_ -.—... - r.= icel. ...:!.4 , .„,,gic,; . .44 I:a a? .. "':,-;.:7• ... .., .i 11 5 ‘ • 1 I 1 A\Cf • . .c I.of 5• "..! Me-ct-it,(6), Flaiis. . 4 I _ . 1 •O'r eICAT H 6 7 • • • il i9,.0 ,,, •,, le+,spe 41 1 '1 *4 f! Lott I .: ; . , 44 •‘a .14 if, Ole' 11---—F.— h,Is. . ..:„.. HE 4-+h •i • ait'. 4 " .xi, . •‘.7.'''' . 4 ;1" :...*°14°.":11.C.ICE R.. ---- ,m. . • - 1 I 5P 6,7 6.015 ,41.2c.:4 rreor . -.. •-' leo&•tsTAVO 5 SEA1IL6 WA '15134 • ammo BY , . .-+-..----. -q1.°7-.._.-. - . . I l';., 1 i . • : • • 1------ -----1 ii- .: , i .. ' . . ----. . • ..._, ..., . , -,,- . ./. .11 . .1 11 ..,......, . ,, ,) • Arr 2!NW) I - 1 i •1' : . . • Lia,,,41,4 1 ..-Arr 1 1:11#) • • /111111 11 III 1 • • II . 11 ....1 '-' --6. t• Aee mtr-A. • I ii i .4 till MOB - • - If : 1,1CR.1 r.CA:f/11.11t1/1•24.1, ',el . ..? :0 I 1 IIK III MIN 1 I T lbw H 1 „:j . . .1 • . ' tv: •(t) II .1,,,,w4:4A/0,-4,i. i is r_ di ......., yr, , . .. I . ! ___, 11.0 01 1. ,__.; ---1--- : • • . . . I -Alt-- ...--) VI?. 1 . . Lir...1. .f- - •. I. I .Willi CI liNd140 1 ''-• 1.4s,t-t-/cur< 7,•-:- .• ••••--,i • • '• i'ZAL` ; — V'" . -,ri.L....— — r 2.'"-!•• ..: ir - . __Ik ,. . • . 1 ;,,,t i • \i-- . / ): . / 1 . . : tb ,\. . . r. ski .. I IA ' a .2t : • (vJostr c..) 18a.a 5r.. • 1 Ametmom• cp4.:,•..ar•Ae4 tAA.-rit-r/ i ., • 1 : . \\\\ 1 ti 1 rccF VT 1 .,.. . • r I ,/ . • ....___,-_.. 0 A _______. . 1.1 IL. ? It L.............1__g,. .frr.lo A...MA. , W . n 1 ., '._ " . • .11111111111 - _ . I 44' i 1 II • 17 1404 ./...W.JA Ge-B4C Pi k.) 4) .e 4,1).4." PA 5 a M5 til/ G1ZANL 5190s. 1/ 1'-o' MIZST rLoc2K Ves'-iLd Stcol-t).,_fja28 vAii_op •,,.? 0 pt. 0 1. E X 73 —10.26-9, Ile. e n. Jall 01,tel 4., I l•40 r ' C:---• 01 111..rts ...i. ...........r. , . RaYIi a,ti ST I ApAM1T ME Nt 9 1 n'b'Tare,c.a 4.4 a4 If — : :;ILI_..--7rI_L._f...[.._- .r..I . r.-1- —1 ,mo,, i I i 1 1 r 1 1 ,\.,-, i -i.),-i -; 6404Re.M —'*;l l ` _ _ , 1 I . 1 set3106a uof.s`. ��.. � 1IIIrIL ._ _II _ IISTX � e a ��r�t 5T0RAGe -...�L, L I M7.Nua rut *-AnT, r4 - Prcar_LWe 5$C-f12N A- A 14., '.ei . ..I. i 1, .I .1..1 .. 1. 1..1.__..1.. . 1 L. 1... I 1 _.--1-_. _..._..----->• _: ,4.,,,y, 427.68 v.� A1'aRtMGµf I Li:L...4% Sia.rn+t.Weep vow-) --- r2^L v4dtt MA99 i_ Ilia i • 1��,,�� d ex1STIN� SNo�I toots `f'R" IwoM -i .4. i w 1 S� - I ,AeEMENT i;I- y 1 P. 6 F gown 11 C �Wx ti"-R 1/4r R 3�4.48 M. a». .... .....__...`. of er.w - . ' . • ,,,i • ; ,, . • 111101PPF p9 i nil I . • papa; . g -. :ii .1 . 1 ii$ . 1 . lift '111 10 iiiiii 1 a 11 i ' g l'. 0,11 . ,. ,i, ; f 1 .Rohm 5 - $ ;. t% $ • " I et° i :: 111111111 lip i . Pll 1 ri 1 kl. la'°. gt * illia Ida i 1 * .- 1111 • 1 • 1 • ila t I 1 "t, - , 1 . lig999 1 {� ` PI �TPner� tr3' .� y 1[���-- .ill/li� ..,b. i ut •' A II I• -;, Ef. r.,•! I ss zagg,d iii•z_ - ,.' l .imm .4'k• 1- aJ \ : 1 �g. . • 1 OW • • Iii IP .71. 11111012:11li' iii" •• ''''' • 1.4:1 1:.1111.it'll_J Pi.. 411421 1 1 A--ii ti- -__ _7!‘ ----1--,,-- -iiii: __ pup livoio_ " " - . .1 . • 0 . P"rk -t:1 h5.11 Matr411:5 :2 • I. • l sr" R L A 14 1 rimii .r.. ; 4 § a r 1 1010 A Ili r i;N •) • 0tJii„. 4 , II. _ t_ _ _ _ ::1 1 w ► M f Y M � t T • Y • Y f Y M r • rp !LLY ? �t !4 .* • • • 1 CHI! i 1 i i tr{�= _"� $! �t�jjjjQ! yar�� eitI14 `` a Lin g 3h1 PI 'A rl 8 �� 11i} it d �• i i� t r i 11 `1 titril It t ki t [l r 8 HI II 1 iir I : torz t: r ri 4t ifil '! i a :i 64i 18 I ; r 1 pli 0 11 tit ti I ILI l it 9iti thi1i t l 4r t 1 E I ! > r r el if 1 1 i it it i • I11111 r fit ill i iI1 .1 : 111t 1 • I r . ! !�r1tA r 1Ri III f a } Rh 1 9 `it 1 r • r f r r „ - i c r F F = F T w • r w r Y r . > if, puff yf it 17 nil !L 4 mil L S L ; rL r L LL{ it �uf= I{ ti ill�n� i i l i[ 9 i Ira a{i�f� �!R ti E art If PAU; EL I rl ii9 1 IiI19! I I[ II1 •IIIlrt ! Ilk111 I I it it ti�el 111 I 1 `t it �ti�t! *8 ' fit I 1iI 1 i lar�wit; 6` 41 iI1Pt !r ! L �t �� mil «� r 1� dill r 11 afI G x f r d1 r ( r . t ! 1 C 2 � 1p s 1 # 1l • I {r l� rgt ' ri1t ItFr 111111' r II lE '_ r�'� a=� lgf1 r ( 'Iii! ,Iii el I ! 0.3 Irp� ; ! [ i 4}}r,1Iii $ .. I . k' WI tlll ris it r1111 I I } OR !g±' r t f I 111 • Ii it li i i iL rE I 1e I nitg I1`JRi 1111Ii �1eir1Ia il Ei 6t u i ' !1� I I i . . 411 i 'i 4 < �ii i t tP C I r • I 4 1 i � �i! •r �" wall 1 r ri.4 Or ig i` t 1 I i �1.l� t r! F 1 li It r 1 tJ1 is B .Q .11 k11 ' f ,[r 11it Illt r > 1rtliratti 11 511 ii% , lit f 81ii t 4 .1 1� III 8 l fill E ;IIA t 1 II 4 l� ; r r arm i t i ! t8 e r ! rr 4_ 8 3 1 � s a r 1 I 1 I i Me cuNCY'SADDRION_-- McCLINCY'S RN PANNELL COMPANY I f •a Y GRADING_DRAINAGE.JunCmEs . «o.rmaN� waumnm-onmoM.ME ert I• _ t GRADING - Rmtme 171.,nr �Mraw.uw s�oa$ on-Io.��aoMw w rs i3 m-Ar...., ta:,.a.o-ar we pyw.r I . • Inelamw w tmaru aav.m-�. caw 1YMIollm .ruymieooivnuanaw Wnw.ui 1 6 •� • ANmcwnwewnc.s-NHVd Nam.anwa 1�Tdats 11.113)411011P S3WlLLfl 3'JYNI1?JO]''JNIGV D d d V VdwW)TI3 s.A3Nn3 VI NowaaYS.AANn3aw i i9 ! i i 11 I: il I iii illiji ! 1 I 11 1 ' i 1 s' 111!!. I if }t t o 1 1 if 11 1 i 1a � u■■■liyie 1 i I ii ii to...1 i 1�1 s it }� 1i falll i .21 bi a to h , t I} 1 II /fel{ ;I 4 i I It 1� le gill 1 1 i 1 °a 1 hill is fl. I` jellai 11.11 a i, ' }a d 1 I p ii ,t1 i �iti } 1 7 I i h3 Par I1l11 ,alo i ; I a lio. r al i 1 iI it li Phil a i I 1 Is 1=$ Itt iiiii I o ii i�'i_Jri i -, a �i gii r• 1�� t{ i .a1�66F , 6 li 11 ■l 1i. �g ii I r #;,1 1 $ i 9 1NM 11 11111 S 111 ,� 1 iile1� „# 1$ ii 1i ; I; 3111111111 ja } , ijif i 1e Ali {j u 11j 1 S1 a 1Pa1i ii i i if , 1 • 1C • 'i i r �q i i ,i$ i� j i i a �� k � iii t , illj X1111 � � Yli s a, ' ! 186sg F a e j ]e1 iI j s (i ill hi < H a al H gait }� 3 h a it �1 s�i9}� a al a�I I bill! 1Y !f ,f11ia dl < .. M M V • 6 r e. d It I t .w I .c I .. I w • iii i j+; I : i9 pia ; pH i L �I ppig i ill z 8 Ill iti o Ili a I . l ��p 11 II1 111v '41iji iooilgk 1 ii a1 aI }is ii I i , tI da II ' 11i1;1 1 11 3i � i Pi 1 p 1I1, ja jill1 11 iI +ail 1 1 i Ii iI ' iI'0419 1s Ii ' 1 e } } 1e i 5 1 E. i ,. 1;8 a ill #i • F ��i li j 1j t a a i tj , r li16 1 l Oil 1. 1IJIlx1h i 1v1 -.. i 11it sU iitl rill cg aa t v II $ 1 II i d < ! N fi � saja E t• , Si I. • 11 (-1 IN _ 1 i1 'I Ilk i�� 1 il 1 tool E ill 3 } Ii i a a tt ial gN __\�'���� �` �- u•� Inc" i ' 011.1111! iiiiit iig a � saes ROO I .„'I . II � . ',•k•1 •• •'�'� 1 ' ,Iir.sEil hi . 3E •s.... / ,: t !ice :' ;• I 'ffn ta,"1 4 I i• e sic �„�e �,,• .. win mmy* • 6 •T� -_�L� t - ; � I Th a ...,.. �, ill Eta F € i 1I .:a:us I y e 1 li. tr V . It.06.01,..-1,re. 1 i 1 la r _ I PP S iiiE- I _. t .1 •• . t 1 lildh i i 1 I a i pa i a. 11 1 -- -- iitl • ! . t MA IT 1 1, i� a • IMP I • ionnio3k1 M l+'' P.41*IAA C:4.12-." 2.' / lo' —1— A Ilh 6•..ca0..,,X/ or 0,•*••.•,,,,.9.IFO.It' <spe.o,oei ' 4d • Illk '192.--. ', • : _ -I! .A". I<-1a-Alstrilla"91 -17 r".4!4tri*541-6674-5,g .... , • .r.,-• i..,.)0..r. 4p....e•PJ.449‘.. . F I iii • 04 tit: t• ••6_446g1 ,1 0r,.----. — II __. tit VI ------- .0 .6 • L'AIM Ail 14 - 1 r.Y..1St1)*AA atsTiol A • /DO- 1 i: •WZ:ANcve.4e- • r Au.c.rertse veoc-rxric I To - ...)t, laggi -_, --',...„ . , DO.fEEPWO Pi Reptocav NV i.--------- r...., .. .,... 1 PLUMP Wrrsior,pAtevpmxpl• •-,•&-• ----___ 'I _su, ,----- . - -, se - . -- Afil•-'.. „V i.....W. 1, ...,.., \ i i . .......... A Vkr ...-•-••-• a -----liP .-2.- - 7 Moo colooto lakaarNceo..1. Oh...". ..,lit 41j‘,.‘-...s. N % ----ft- - ---— - - , ,p, - ....- '-'.-- ----4! --.-.•N -. • -*P411-Jet.:f/2$9,4p. 4 , \4r, DA ,__e"" '...Ze.4..,.7 rit...-11:i;...... _,.. 1 FAT -. 1 it 1 4.• 1 6 1 I 1 7,-7 \ \ 7 -"4".''''A"41114 igref1146 erYo4+6,4m.T 41'4: 0 I 1 . _..)1 .;...-.. .,:!.....r.):.74. • I i 14cRifi . i V „ •E.g.1 NG k...9, • -ei 1 % 0o • L. _ 1. k • . 2-,."1-3 ' .-4 1 / GRAYLL dokeie,6 I t 1 % ItLALIR;L orTo1.4.1yKeN ),t, .. I 1 .,* Q.6 . 4to oe... --•0 &• -J -A-,AN EMI:tire I /i.':- - JO a 0 t.CIR. - .•/Z. -4 '45 4";..YSI—1 "7 i . 1 1 • •0,, , -AFXAM I 61 ----k- , " 0)i . ''''-'1"` —...... '4,41,1C,0 ....____tO• r i 0 4. . ,... • ra,v.....,4........... tl . Jcs ,r ,..._:0„,,,, (o. .. le. ---,_....., - - wromig. ..,./ / ul E/ Exr-,E)E,Ague.. 1 4 LAND5cArr_ 1.1_44 20 1i- Fr O . _- . - 1 dEt -4 --I.- ! i 2 _. CONTOURS _. 4 1 1 .........:LA4n5. AREA PrrAf1.- -... g. 4445T. • Ike 4. . e- Z • ___________ . _-.-L-Ne 44-ivr•- •4 Z __ --- -1?LAN1- . --s—c14E171,JLr • ti:i i - 4 • - comi44•3 t41,1 _•____1_Par/4414AL i.lAsle 1.10 WM .6(ArA14Co a .r KI5T.ING,‘n&IllectioN tq...A Ae t1 0,„Lc pr. 1---' . et'Ul cAr-rAt ANIPer. J.wit.Temil I. G c au. 5,c,er.- , "7.14;10,..pkte.P P4.1poope14•427,..A.••••letio ea..cnoi. 7010:-.E4-r--64.47. 1 i AT 4t 1.11011141A rIk&OCF4 f: rsAstici 10 *col- +'-e:e oc it -, 06,,L 0,t,- Wykra4 PriAg• ?Aim&LAU.rbec)t.k9.s. 14 2 PIM- 4'.e et. I 7-;4 0 0 4'V-.5- ill Z. . Gium4:aeovtiKe. 4 ::, •• ,•1 NI -ZREtp145 61.JP4.111•Wele..T 1.frptItic1li4 6AwycisluM 14 q-. tV Greerol 6 1.9,14e0A NIAllew41A 14.4.P.N• 14 O. - - - .— . . WM ....n. .....4..•••.eams.... A7L;-, CIT: )F RENTON N l Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 15, 1997 Mr. George Lucker Architect 1506 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98134 SUBJECT: McClincy's Addition Project No. LUA-97-035,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Lucker: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the Environmental Determination. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, Mark R. P , AICP Project ager FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer 4111116. 10.1 Washington State Northwest Region �I/ Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Sid Morrison P.O. Box 330310 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DATE: May 16, 1997 MY 2 1 1997 TO: Mark Pywell RECEIVED City of Renton, Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 405 MP 4.02 CS 1744 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-MCClincy's Addition of a storage area, showroom, & two apartment units File No.LUA-97-035,SA,ECF FROM: Ro ert A. Josephs , PE, Manager of Planning & Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project, which is located at 4604 NE 4th Street. Our response is below: We have reviewed the subject document and have no further comments. The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC)has issued a Determination of Non- a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal Significance - Mitigated for the following newspaper ofgeneralpublication and is now and has been for more than six months project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language MCCLINCY'S ADDITION continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County LUA-97-035,SA,ECF Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the Administ alive Site lPlan Aeview and pproval to con- State of Washington for King County. struct an addition onto an existing busi- The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County Hess.Location:4604 NE 4th Street. Journal not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers The 15 day comment and appeal period (andPP 9 y for this project will run concurrently. The during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a commenUappeal period for this project will end at 5:00 PM on May 13, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Notice of Environmental Determonation Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the pro- ject file and the mitigation measures as published on: 4/28/97 imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoi talication is the sum of$39.30 available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Legal Number 285941- Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235- 2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. Legal Clerk h County OUlllal Published in the South County Journal g y April28, 1997.2859 Subscribed and sworn befofe me on this I ay of 19 --q _,4 �. y ., �N�� Notary Public of the State of Washington . SI0 residing in Renton \: f " Ij/ King County, Washington *= `` Y / O; i 1 O. 1t�4%,,,W Sti\�s • : CITY OF RENTON tURRENt PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 2.4t day of Artx L. , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States,.a sealed envelope containing Stine% documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing TiNA Gt..° (Signature of Sender) :1)...V.6ett_ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS ' COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that `` -'717VDsgiq- C&Z"-- -E/ -2. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. •, •• _ Dated: 10 glqi "-A7/4( P r • Notary Pubt in and fi•• he State of WashiVon i-,VL0 Notary (Print) ve-e- J- 4j My appointment expires: '' ,/)„.'••• y Project Name: • M c.C.1‘vLc ..d (s Isrcl t4lCIVN Project Number: WA 411 5 , Ee_p NOTARY.DOC v • REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION REPORT DATE: April 22, 1997 Project Name: McClincy's Addition ' Applicant: Timothy McClincy Owner: Timothy McClincy File Number- LUA-097-035,SA,ECF Project Manager- Mark R. Pywell Project Description: The applicant seeks approval to construct an addition onto an existing 1870 sf building that currently includes a showroom, warehouse area, and one apartment unit on the second floor. The approximately 2,100 sf addition to the footprint area will include additional showroom and warehouse area, plus two additional apartment units on the second floor. The total footprint of the ' resulting structure will be 3,970 sf. Project Location: 4604 NE 4th Street Exist. Bldg. Area SF: 2,756 sf Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 3,830 sf Site Area: 12,258 sf (0.28 acres) Total Building Area SF: 6,568 sf - , I -r 1.- '1::21....-','!''''' I 1 ri , • i 8 a -R7 V I a a G S CG-5 sw z '! Z1a ©rr . ' ' '• i CSfl io 23'5 a. I 4 _ ® ' S NI ® ` , a1 1 B� . N ' © ' • ® ,, 'p si !r".+:. - 1= �"a.„. ' �t 3 i e•�t i lot'i :I —'il d 'n •yr 1•' I... 1 ..;� . RENTo l .GoRP.L .IMI t j I.6 A/Re - - . \ \g11 iti Project Location Map STERCRPT.DOC i City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&En mental Review Committee Stall Report MCCLINCY'S ADDITION LUA-97-035,SA,ECF REPORT OFApril 17,1997 Page 2 of 12 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant owns a home decorating business that is operated out of a building located on NE 4th Street in the City of Renton. The structure houses the showroom area and a warehouse area on the first floor. An apartment is located on the existing second floor of the building. The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 2,100 sf addition onto the building that will be used for showroom and warehouse area. In addition the applicant would like to construct two new apartments on the second floor of the new building. The total structure after construction would provide for approximately 3,970 sf of showroom and storage area on the first floor and three apartment units on the second floor. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: (1) Earth Impacts: The only significant impacts of the proposed project would occur during the construction phase of the project when the soil is exposed and susceptible to erosion. The applicant will need to provide a temporary erosion control plan to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department. The temporary erosion control measures will need to be maintained during the entire construction phase of the project. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall prepare and submit a Temporary Erosion Control Management Plan to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. The erosion control measures contained within this plan shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Development Services representative during the entire construction phase of the project. Policy Nexus: Mining, Grading, and Excavation Ordinance, Environmental Ordinance (2) Air Impacts: Air quality impacts will be limited to exhaust from construction equipment and vehicles during the construction phase of the project and to vehicles and heating sources during the operation phase of this development. State, regional, and federal standards already apply to the vehicles, equipment, and heating sources. No further regulations are required at the local level. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: N/A STERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&E, ,?mental Review Committee Staff Report MCCLINCY'S ADDITION LUA-97-035,SA,ECF REPORT OFApril 17,1997 Page 3 of 12 (3) Transportation Impacts: The expansion of the showroom and the number of apartment units in the same building will cause an equivalent rise in the number of vehicle trips generated by this site on a daily basis. Based upon the ITE Manual, it is estimated that the new construction will generate approximately 16.8 new trips per day. At$75.00 per trip it is estimated that the Transportation Mitigation Impact fee will be $1260. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall provide a Transportation Impact Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per new trip generated by the proposed development. The applicant shall submit the fee prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. Policy Nexus: Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (4) Fire Prevention Bureau Impacts: The proposed addition to the building will place an additional burden on the existing fire services provided by the City of Renton. A fire mitigation fee of$0.52 per square foot of new construction will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee is estimated at $2,558.92. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation Fee of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (4) Noise Impacts: Noise will be generated during the construction phase of the project. Although the City's existing noise levels, construction activities while not violating the exact letter of the ordinance can have a significant impact on adjacent single family residences. Construction activities on this site should be limited to the hours between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Saturday hours may be arranged in advance with written approval from the Development Services Division. No construction should occur on Sundays. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall limit construction activities to the hours between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged with the Development Services Division but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday Construction. Policy Nexus: Noise Ordinance, Environmental Ordinance (5) Parks and Recreation Impacts: The applicant will be constructing two new apartment units and will not be constructing any on-site recreational facilities. The tenants of these units will make use of the existing City of Renton recreation facilities. To mitigate this impact the applicant will need to provide a mitigation fee of$354.51 per new unit. It is estimated that the mitigation fee will be $709.02 for this project, the mitigation fee is due prior to the issuance of building permits. STERCRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&E'• ',mental Review Committee Staff Report MCCLINCY'S ADDITION LUA-97-035,SA,ECF REPORT OFApri117,1997 Page 4 of 12 Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a Parks Mitigation fee of$354.51 per unit. The applicant shall submit this fee prior to the issuance of building/construction permits. Policy Nexus: Parks Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. XX Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment and A••eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment and Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Appeal Period. Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall prepare and submit a Temporary Erosion Control Management Plan to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. The erosion control measures contained within this plan shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Development Services representative during the entire construction phase of the project. 2. The applicant shall provide a Transportation Impact Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per new trip generated by the proposed development. The applicant shall submit the fee prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. 3. The applicant shall limit construction activities to the hours between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged with the Development Services Division but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday Construction. 4. The applicant shall submit a Parks Mitigation fee of $354.51 per unit. The applicant shall submit this fee prior to the issuance of building/construction permits. 5. The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation Fee of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. STERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&E mental Review Committee Staff Report MCCLINCY'S ADDITION LUA-97-035,SA,ECF REPORT OFApril 17,1997 Page 5 of 12 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General Notes 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 2. The applicant will need to submit sign permit applications for all new signage. 3. The applicant will need to obtain easements for any off-site work on private property. Community Services Department 1. Recommend deciduous street trees along NE 4th Street in place of or along with Blue Carpet Juniper, species of the street tree will need to be coordinated with the Parks Division. Fire Prevention Bureau 1.The preliminary required fire flow is 3750 GPM. Four fire hydrants are required, one within 150 feet of the building and three within 300 feet of the building. 2.The building remodel shall meet all adopted codes related to the occupancy uses. Water Utility • 1. The System Development Charge (SDC) shall be at the current rate of$0.113 per square foot of property (12,258 square feet). This fee is subject to a redevelopment credit. 2. Individual meters for the additional apartments is required. SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.078 per square foot of property (12,258). 2. The property is required to be connected to sanitary sewer. A manhole is available for connection within the property frontage. SURFACE WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious area of property (6758 per plans). 2. Water quality for the paved areas may be required if the low areas are considered sensitive or wetlands. PLAN REVIEW- GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. 'A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. STERCRPT.DOC 1 City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&E nmental Review Committee Staff Report MCCLINCY'S ADDITION LUA-97-035,SA,ECF • REPORT OFApri117,1997 Page 6 of 12 PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action XX Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 1, Neighborhood Detail Map (Received March 18, 1997). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 1A, Site Plan (Received March 27, 1997). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. L-1, Landscape Plan (Received March 27. 1997). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. C-1, Utility Plan (Received March 18, 1997). Exhibit No. 6 Drawing No. 2, Floor Plans (Received March 18, 1997). Exhibit No. 7 Drawing No. 3, Building Elevations (Received March 27, 1997). Exhibit No. 8 Drawing No. 4, Building Cross-Sections (Received March 18, 1997). C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31- 33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 9. GENERAL CRITERIA: a. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; The proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies. The project site is designated as Center Suburban on the Land Use Element Map of the Comprehensive Plan. Objective LU-T: Develop suburban centers that provide a wide range of consumer goods and services to an area that includes several neighborhoods, but is smaller than the entire city. The existing uses, apartments and home decorating services, are consistent with the intent of the land use designation. STERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&E . nmental Review Committee Staff Report MCCLINCY'SADDITION LUA-97-035,SA,ECF REPORT OFApri117,1997 Page 7 of 12 Policy LU-111: Site designs that locate parking lots associated with commercial uses, apartments, or other uses behind or adjacent to structures are encouraged. Discourage parking lots from locating between structures and street right-of-way. While this proposed project does not remove the existing parking between the building and the street, the proposed new parking area is located behind the building. Nothing in the policies or existing ordinance would require the applicant to remove or relocate the existing parking to achieve consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Policy LU-123: In order to achieve a balanced mix, multi-family uses are intended to be integrated into the Centers. Residential density should be 10-20 dwelling units per acre. New residential only structures may be limited in order to encourage a 50% commercial/office mix within the Center. The three proposed apartment units on the site provide a density of 10.7 units per acre. This is within the range sought by the Comprehensive Plan for this area. The proposed project also includes a commercial component that will help to achieve the required commercial activity in this area. b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The proposed site is designated as Center Suburban (CS). The home decorating service and the apartments are permitted uses within this zone. The applicant's existing building is located 38 feet back from the front property line along NE 4th Street. The CS zone establishes a maximum setback of 15 feet for the front setback unless through the site plan review process the requirement for the setback is modified. In this case the applicant is constructing an addition on to the rear of the building. This addition will not structurally change the front of the building. It would seem to be an unreasonable requirement to require the applicant to extend the building 23-feet closer to the roadway in order to met the maximum setback requirement. The applicant is providing 12 parking stalls in accordance with the Parking and Loading Ordinance requirements. If as noted above, the applicant was required to extend the front of the building in order to meet the maximum setback requirement, then the applicant would loose some of the existing parking stalls and would no longer be in compliance with this ordinance. Although the adjacent lot to the west is used for a single-family residence, the special landscape requirements are not applicable in this case as the adjacent lot is zoned as Center Suburban (CS) as is the applicants parcel. c. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposed remodel/expansion of the building should assist with the conservation of area- wide property values. The proposed project will develop a previously vacant portion of the project site. The proposed landscaping and improvements to the building should raise the value of the subject property and have a positive influence on the surrounding area. d. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; During the construction phase of the project, noise will be generated by the equipment and activities required for the construction. The hours of construction are already limited and no further conditions are necessary as part of the site plan review. It is not anticipated that the proposed development will create any noise, odors or other harmful or unhealthy conditions. The City has no record of complaints against the existing land use. e. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use;and Public services and facilities are available to serve this development provided that the applicant complies with existing ordinance and building code requirements. STERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&E nmental Review Committee Staff Report MCCLINCY'S ADDITION LUA-97-035,SA,ECF REPORT OFApril 17,1997 Page 8 of 12 f. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The proposed development will complete the potential development on the subject property. This development with the required landscaping should improve the appearance of the site and help to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight that might otherwise have occurred on the vacant portions of the site. 2. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES: a. Mitigation of undesirable impacts of proposed structures and site layouts that could impair the use or enjoyment or potential use of surrounding uses and structures and of the community; The applicant is providing the required landscape buffers along the perimeter of the subject property. The landscaping will help to buffer the views of the development on the subject property especially in the area that is being developed for new parking area. b. Mitigation of undesirable impacts when an overscale structure, in terms of size, bulk, height, and intensity, or site layout is permitted that violates the spirit and/or intent of the zoning code and impairs the use, enjoyment or potential use of surrounding properties; The proposed project is not overscale for the proposed site. The proposed development will complete the build-out of the site at a level that is required for this area by the zoning code and the Comprehensive Plan. The three apartment units are at a density (10-20 du/acre) required for this area. The proposed building complies with the height and setback requirements while providing the required number of parking stalls. c. Provision of effective screening from public streets and residential uses for all permitted outdoor storage areas(except auto and truck sales), for surface mounted utility equipment, for rooftop equipment, and for all refuse and garbage containers, in order to promote a "campus- like"or"park-like"setting where appropriate and to preserve the effect and intent of screening or buffering otherwise required by the zoning code; The applicant is providing a ten foot landscaped area along NE 4th Street in accordance with existing development standards. This landscaped area will buffer the view of this lot from the street. The existing parking does intrude into this landscaping along the eastern side of the frontage. This project is not making any changes in this portion of the site. If the applicant is required to install landscaping in this area, it would reduce the number of parking stalls on- site to a level below that which is required by ordinance. If the applicant was demolishing the existing building and the parking area, then the-new development would be required to install the required landscaping. However, as this project is not improving this portion of the site, the existing parking arrangement may be retained. d. Consideration of placement and design of exterior lighting in order to avoid excessive brightness or glare to adjacent properties and streets. The applicant has not demonstrated any new exterior lighting on the project plans. Security lighting should be provided in the rear parking lot that will be used by the renters in the apartments. The applicant should submit a lighting plan for the project site. The security lighting will need to be provided in a manner that does not cause glare on the adjacent properties or roadways. 3. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF A PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE: a. Building placement and spacing to provide for privacy and noise reduction; orientation to views and vistas and to site amenities, to sunlight and prevailing winds, and to pedestrian and vehicle needs; The new addition will be constructed on the rear of the existing building. The apartments are located on the second floor of the building and will be accessed from the rear of the site. This arrangement should provide for the degree of privacy that is available on the subject site. b. Use of existing topography to reduce undue cutting, filling and retaining walls in order to prevent erosion and unnecessary storm water runoff, and to preserve stable natural slopes and desirable natural vegetation; STERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Ei .:mental Review Committee Staff Report MCCLINCY'S ADDITION LUA-97-035,SA,ECF REPORT OFApril 17,1997 Page 9 of 12 The project has been designed to fit onto the existing site with the minimum amount of grading. The site slopes downward away from NE 4th Street. A partial basement will be constructed under the new portion of the building to provide a first floor at the same level as the existing building. This design should not cause any unstable areas on the subject property. c. Design and protection of planting areas so that they are not susceptible to damage from vehicles or pedestrian movements; Planting areas will be protected from vehicles by the location of curbing and wheelstops in accordance with the Parking and Loading Ordinance. d. Consideration of building form and placement and landscaping to enhance year-round conditions of sun and shade both on-site and on adjacent properties and to promote energy conservation. The location of the proposed building is determined by the existing building. This location should allow for the sun to reach all portion of the development and the proposed landscaped areas. 4. CIRCULATION AND ACCESS: a. Provision of adequate and safe vehicular access to and from all properties; Due to the narrow confines of the site (70' width), circulation will be limited to one side of the site. Access (pedestrian and vehicular) will be limited to the western side of the property. If at a later date, the property to the west of the subject property is developed for commercial development, then it is possible that a joint driveway may be developed on the boundary of the two sites. b. Arrangement of the circulation pattern so that all ingress and egress movements may occur at as few points as possible along the public street, the points being capable of channelization for turning movements; There is only one point of access to this project site. c. Consolidation of access points with adjacent properties, when feasible; The adjacent parcel, although zoned commercial, only has a single-family home on it. In the future, it is possible that if the adjacent lot is developed for a commercial land use that a joint access could be developed with this lot. d. Separation of loading and delivery areas from parking and pedestrian areas; Most of the pedestrian traffic will be from the street to the front portion of the store. The loading area will be on the rear portion of the lot. When the residents of the apartments walk from the apartments to the streets they will have to walk past the delivery area. Due to the narrow confines of the property it is impossible to provide them with a different means of access. However, due to the nature of this business, deliveries are made by a small van. Thus, this should not cause a significant problem where it might be one if deliveries were by large tractor trailers. e. Provision for safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking areas, buildings, public sidewalks and adjacent properties. On this project site the pedestrian access onto the site will be through the driveway or over the curb and into the parking stalls. Due to the existing layout of the front parking lot there is not enough room to provide for a separate pedestrian path to the building. The applicant will be providing a walkway along the edge of the building. In some projects with a higher traffic volume the City has required the applicant to provide a painted walkway across the driveway. In this case, due to the narrow confines of the site, the painted walkway would be right along the parking spaces. This would cause more confusion with the movement of vehicles on-site then it would resolve. STERCRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Et mental Review Committee Staff Report MCCLINCY'SADDITION LUA-97-035,SA,ECF REPORT OF April 17,1997 Page 10 of 12 5. SIGNAGE: a. Employment of signs primarily for the purpose of identification; The applicant has shown the location of the identification signs for the proposed project. The applicant will need to submit sign permit applications for any new signs in accordance with the existing sign code. b. Management of sign elements, such as size, location and arrangement so that signs complement the visual character of the surrounding area and appear in proportion to the building and site to which they pertain; The proposed signs will be on the front face of the building. The signs have been sized and located in accordance with the existing sign code. c. Limitation of the number of signs to avoid visual clutter and distraction; Two wall signs will be located on the front of the building. This should not cause visual clutter or distraction for the passing motorist. d. Moderation of surface brightness or lighting intensity except for that necessary for sign visibility;and The lighting method of the signs will need to be identified on any permits that are submitted. e. Provision of an identification system to allow for quick location of buildings and addresses. (Ord. 3981, 4-7-86) The wall signs will allow for the quick location of the proposed use of the building. XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for construction of a 2,000 sf addition to an existing building. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 thru 8. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Center Suburban. 5) Zoning: The Site Plan as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the CS (Center Suburban) Zoning designation. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Residential/Commercial; East: Commercial; South: Commercial and West: Residential/Commercial STERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&En mental Review Committee Staff Report MCCLINCY'SADDITION LUA-97-035,SA,ECF REPORT OFApri117,1997 Page 11 of 12 E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Center Suburban; and the Zoning designation of Center Suburban. F. Decision The Site Plan for McClincy's Addition, File No. LUA-97-035, is approved. CONDITIONS ' None. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: April.28, 1997 SIGNATURES: ,o-t- G�zz-77 ames C.Hanson, Zoning Administrator date Michael D.Kattermann,Zoning Administrator date Ii STERCRPT.DOC ,City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&En- mental Review Committee Staff Report MCCLINCY'S ADDITION LUA-97-035,SA,ECF REPORT OFApril 17,1997 Page 12 of 12 TRANSMITTED this 23rd day of April, 1997 to the applicant and owner: Timothy W. McClincy 4604 NE 4th Street Renton, WA 98059 George W. Lucker, Architect 1506 First Ave. So. Seattle,WA 98134 TRANSMITTED this 23rd day of April, 1997 to the parties of record: None TRANSMITTED 23rd day of April, 1997 to the following: Larry Meckling,Building Official Bob Arthur,Land Use Inspector Art Larson,Fire Marshal Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL (COMBINED COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIOD) Environmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 13, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor City of Renton Development Services Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680]and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 13, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. STERCRPT.DOC • - I -7") CIT' OF RENTON I \ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 23, 1997 Mr. George Lucker Architect 1506 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98134 SUBJECT: McClincy's Addition Project No. LUA-97-035,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Lucker: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on April 22, 1997, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: See enclosed Mitigation Measures document. WAC 197-11-660 states that the responsibility for implementation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project, any mitigation measure established by the ERC not directly attributable to an ' identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. Environmental Determination Comment Process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 13, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 13, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. DNSMLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 II a April23, 1997 Page-2 I \ I Staff urges you to contactjthe various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have f specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (206).277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, 1 Ovkaisk._ Ma R. Pywell {/t.1 Project Manager cc: Mr. Timothy McClincy/Property Owner Enclosure • • • � I ` I dnsmitr CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-035,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Mr. Timothy McClincy PROJECT NAME: McClincy's Addition DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Mr. Timothy McClincy, seeks Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) and Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA) to construct an addition onto an existing business. The addition will include a storage area, showroom, and two apartment units. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4604 NE 4th Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall prepare and submit a Temporary Erosion Control Management Plan to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. The erosion control measures contained within this plan shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Development Services representative during the entire construction phase of the project. 2. The applicant shall provide a Transportation Impact Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per new trip generated by the proposed development. The applicant shall submit the fee prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. 3. The applicant shall limit construction activities to the hours between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged with the. Development Services Division but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday Construction. 4. The applicant shall submit a Parks Mitigation fee of$354.51 per unit. The applicant shall submit this fee prior to the issuance of building/construction permits. 5. The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation Fee of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. it CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-035,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Mr.Timothy McClincy PROJECT NAME: McClincy's Addition DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Mr. Timothy McClincy, seeks Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) and Administrative Site Plan' Approval (SA) to construct an addition onto an existing business. The addition will include a storage area, showroom, and two apartment units. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4604 NE 4th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General Notes 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 1 2. The applicant will need to submit sign permit applications for all new signage. 3. The applicant will need to obtain easements for any off-site work on private property. Community Services Department 1. Recommend deciduous street trees along NE 4th Street in place of or along with Blue Carpet Juniper, species of the street tree will need to be coordinated with the Parks Division. Fire Prevention Bureau 1. The preliminary,required fire flow is 3750 GPM. Four fire hydrants are required, one within 150 feet of the building and three within 300 feet of the building. 2. The building remodel shall meet all adopted codes related to the occupancy uses. Water Utility 1. The System Development Charge (SDC) shall be at the current rate of$0.113 per square foot of property (12,258 square feet). This fee is subject to a redevelopment credit. 2. Individual meters for the additional apartments is required. SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.078 per square foot of property (12,258). 2. The property is required to be connected to sanitary sewer. A manhole is available for connection within the property frontage. � l McClincy's Addition LUA-97-035,SA,ECF Advisory Notes (Continued) SURFACE WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious area of property(6758 per plans). PLAN REVIEW-GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required.When plans are complete three copies of the drawings,two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is att shed for your system prior to wissuing Hever, it is recommendedto call the 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated bypermit On the 2y ^ day of Ackv1�, , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing CRC. d tCe- w whe-hct,‘s documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Dick Anderson Department of Transportation KC Water Pollution Control Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher Department of Fisheries David Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Sue Rumery City of Seattle Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom, Fisheries Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Rita Perstac Puget Power (Signature of Sender) AL.t- k- • S-G-ctice STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ' A '4 e signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 7 "/✓J L7211v/Gll Notary Public' and for t tate of Washtr,5,t4 Notary (Print) J'riffi 1-4-2ET .-r, _PLC/¢74 c' My appointment expires: Project Name: • Mc.C.A 1 .C..•- c Ada Cl n" Project Number: LAIN 9.-1, — 035, sA ,EEf NOTARY.DOC = CITOFRENTON . .,. . - �:,Planning/Building/Public-Works Department. Jesse Tarin c,Mayor • :Gregg Zimmerman P.E.;Administrator • •April 23,.1997 • Washington State ' Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 : Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations . Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on April 22,1997: • :.DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MCCLINCY'S ADDITION LUA-97-035,SA,ECF ' •. The applicant, Mr. Timothy McClincy, seeks Environmental-.Checklist Review(ECF) and Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA)to construct an addition onto an existing business. The addition will include a storage area, showroom, and two apartment units. 'Location:::4604 NE 4th Street. • . The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation'measures by the Environmental Review Committee under'their'authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal. Code. These conditions are'necessary rocess. . to mng the environmental review tal impacts identified during p = Environmental Determination Comment Process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 13, 1997.:Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental' • determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law orfact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments;,if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not .,: sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: ;Jana:Huerter,Land Use Review Supervisor, City:of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA••98055. :�'. :•.:: : :.� , ', <�;� ,;. _• - - • s, 1. - . ;`' : 200;Mill Avenue'•South:=:Renton,Washington 98055 :Agency Letter ,... McClincy's Addition/LUA-97-035,SA,ECF .:'',:: ':: :' ': :' = ; • Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process. Appeals of either the environmental - determination [RCW 43121.0075(3),WAC.197-11-680]and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 13,j1997. If no appeals are filed by this date,both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South,-Renton, WA 9805:5. =:. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B.°Additional information - "- regarding the:appeal-process may be-obtained'from the=Renton City Clerk's=Office,:(425)-235-2501. If you have questions, please call me at (206)277-5586. • For the Environmental Review Committee, • Ma R. Pywell,Al P Project Manager cc: - King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro l ;,;~ • Department of Wildlife - Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries - ;David F. Dietzman;Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter,Department of Transportation :, .. Sue Rumery, City of Seattle:,,, r' Duwamish Tribal Office . • -Rod Malcom,Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian-Tribe"(Ordinance) } - Rita Perstac, Puget Power '' • 'I' I GNCYL - ;A --CITY OF RENT ON DETERMINATION OF_NON-SIGNIFICANCE 1MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): :.LUA-97-035;SA,ECF::::,:: • ".:APPLICANT: Mr.,Timothy McClincy •:,PROJECT NAME: :: . •McClincy's Addition c DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The;= applicant, "-Mr. • Timothy McClincy, , seeks -! .---Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) and Administrative Site Plan'Approval-(SA) to construct an addition"onto'an':existing business The addition will include a storage'area, showroom, and :'-two apartment units LOCATION OF PROPOSAL •_4604:NE4thStreet MITIGATION MEASURES: r, • r • s` `•` • 1. <The applicant.shall prepare and submita'Temporary Erosion Control .-Management Plan to:the satiisfaction°of the'Development,Services Department - prior to the issuance of construction/building'permits:,The erosion control :. j measures contained within''this`planshall be maintained to the satisfaction of -'. '_ ..the Development SerVicesprepresentative'duringthe entire.construction phase • � •= - " of the project. 2. The applicant,shall.. rovide'a Transportation Impact'Miti Mitigation Fee of • P 9 $75.00 per new trip'generated by the proposed!development. The applicant shall:submit the fee prior to the'issuance,of construction/building permits: . 3. The applicant shall limit construction activities to the hours between 7:00 • AM and 7:00 PM,'Monday through Friday,:Saturdays as arranged with'the Development Services Division but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday Construction. , 4. . The applicant shall submit a Parks Mitigation fee of$354.51 per unit. •• : The applicant shall submit this fee prior to the issuance of building/construction . permits:' 5. ;::.The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation Fee of$0.52 per square foot ' ° ::of new construction This fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building • .. - .i. .: .._.- 1. • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE - (MITIGATED) I ADVISORY NOTES • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-035,SA,ECF . 'APPLICANT: : - - Mr.Timothy McClincy PROJECT NAME: : McClincy's Addition 'DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: ' ' The •applicant; Mr.`.Timothy McClincy, seeks Environmental = 1 Checklist Review:(ECF) and Administrative Site:Plan Approval (SA) to:construct an addition onto an • existing-business. The addition will include a storage;larea, showroom, and two apartment units., ' LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4604 NE 4th Street - Advisory Notes to Applicant:. The'following notes are supplemental:information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination.'Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations • General Notes �.... :<. • 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit:areasand collection points Shall'be"easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks - 2. The applicant will need to submitsign.permit applications for all newsignage. • .3. The applicant will need to obtain easements for any off-site work on private:property. Community Services Department % • - '- 1: Recommend;deciduous street trees along NE 4th Street in"place of or along With Blue Carpet = :Juniper, species of the street tree will need to-be coordinated with.the Parks Division: :Fire Prevention'Bureau -"v•.c - - 1. The preliminary required fire flow is 3750 GPM ''Fourfire hydrants are required, one within 150 feet : • • of the building and three within 300 feet of the building: 2 The building remodel shall meet all adopted codes related to the occupancy uses. Water Utility • 1. The System Development Charge (SDC) shall be at the current rate of$0.113 per square foot of property (12,258 square feet). This fee is subject to.a redevelopment credit. , 2: =:individual meters for the additional apartments is required. : - . A'ITA stem '.' .SANITARY SEWER: -' ': • _ • ..: = - • 1 . - . y Development Charge shall,be at the current rate of$0.078 per square foot of property 2. The property is re `ured to.be connected to sanita sewer A manhole is a the propertyvailable for connection_; -frontage_ .. : ... . . ,: . ..., ; , .ry ':. : .;-.:_;., .. •. .,, -. within _ I ..... ..... McClincy's Addition' '. = LUA-97-035,SA,ECF - - - . : • - ' ' Advisory Notes(Continued] - ' SURFACE WATER .: :. - .- 1. - The'System-Development Charge shall be.,at the"current,rate of$0.129 per,square foot of new. ' . - impervious area of property(6758 per plans). - - PLAN REVIEW-GENERAL_ - ' - - , . - 1.. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards.- . •_ I., �, ,L 2,' '".-:A:construction permit-is required:,When plans are complete three copies of the,drawings,two:.. ::._,... copies`if the drainage'report, a construction estimate;application".and appropriate fee shalF:be submitted : .._ ` -. to the fourth floor counter. 'A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call • - 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. :. - ' .. z:'z 1`1,•'. J „ i.. 11 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. MCCLINCY'S ADDITION LUA-97-035,SA,ECF Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval to construct an addition onto an existing business. Location: . 4604 NE 4th Street The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal period for this project will end at 5:00 PM on May 13, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. Publication Date: April 28, 1997 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot • / a . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION • PROJECT NAME: MCCLINCY'S ADDITION PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-035,SA,ECF • The applicant.Mr.Timothy McClincy,seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF)and Administrative Site Plan Approval(SA)to construct an addition onto an existing business.The addition will include a storage area,showroom,and two apartment units. Location:4604 NE 4th Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED ' THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. - ' 1 AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. _ Ixxx l YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON MAY 13, 1997 OR APPEAL • , THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,MAY 13.1997. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. 171 T- T— -----='(-. --- g-1 • �v G-5 II' 'i iic-5 .r' I 61�© ©- ' , CSi IOSW4 �9.© . 4(V- T.I I.1 I.. `',. -v f 0 . . g. ' •-,.. •-- .. •--to. • ,g; -i, •• • i 1 1 ,,., ;Iv ,Lii • ., J . • . ..,.. ., ' — ', f�HT., C RP.uMI (•h;71 N AGu; 4t' '!I,GT' •• ... ,—.�.+�. j4]._ TAB Ggzr L41 J r5•on T +' • 7 c, IILk 5 I .I K,. . • 't I it - r—.1c. ;I ( `• ^.,, OFOR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for properfle identification. ' CERTIFICATIO F • i, sAApLu ,J LscY'1 , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were postediby me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . ,A9r Ss, Ncil • Signed: St cL-, y.0 . U STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) • _ • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that S vi't JfICIZ-SoA/ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volurttar'r;:�ct f"oj'tbe uses J ' and purposes mentioned in the instrument. •c:.,.,..s• . . 4 Dated: 4/4/7 r G , -4'-t�E-n y �, Notary Pub ' in and fo a Starts vtlA ntitil lo.n! - 4:'-.-,..141/yr.k ;' Notary (Print) / - ,2GT),�'' ' . My appointment expires: 9 , • HOTARY,OOC ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: MCCLINCY'S ADDITION PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-035,SA,ECF The applicant, Mr.Timothy McClincy,seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF)and Administrative Site Plan Approval(SA)to construct an addition onto an existing business. The addition will include a storage area, showroom,and two apartment units. Location: 4604 NE 4th Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. XXX YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON MAY 13, 1997 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, MAY 13, 1997. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. I I�1 10 .. . _ , - K-. ♦.so]I 11 j —L.....tre.... [ �� Cam;,. '',a i v ®I 0.5 Zle. ' G _ 5 � ,I 4 ✓• '-1 4�� : 4 •° 4 Io•23.5 61 ,•© r1 • ,f; t ' -.- 09 a 0 . • d �f »t• rP• . .OA. :M��\ ,. • , -I - •fl 1,,.1•• (. r, eCfrloteoee:,•,g ueoo:o4oT:4 I :1 'i'...II •—.•VI 1 .i I :I �I e .+�:E I r I;I , . RENTol .00RP. .LIMI .ia MA`T I Fl 5 AGf : 1 N ,A. /�pi • I1 . `f NW /�� I , �j,, ,�..,,,,II �l� R i., /5-23.5 W' I01" cctz LWII 1 ;; for(r Iv..! f f, 4,.4 - 69 7 C .r 5 i i .IiaateroUo�xfsvetee�,if'i1. Lori �r y. I • 4. li_ , .I I i P G�rro�5 1w JSFzu FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION .. .. Project 9P P. ntii.:.c.. Please include°this ro'ecf NUMBER when'calling.'for rt� .er.:..:,l,.ei; entl icatuon*:::: ..:::::.:::>::;. I ' CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-035,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Mr. Timothy McClincy PROJECT NAME: McClincy's Addition DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Mr. Timothy McClincy, seeks Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) and Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA)\to construct an addition onto an existing business. The addition will include a storage area, showroom, and two apartment units. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4604 NE 4th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. PUBLICATION DATE: April 28, 1997 DATE OF DECISION: April 22, 1997 I . SIGNATURES: 9i 4" Nige i eA 91221 77 Gregg Zlgh erman dministrator� DATE Departme of nning/Building/Public Works m Chastain,Adminis rator DAT /22/77 Community Se ice Departme t F 1 .- e''‘°'..1"7/''iL i 4-72 17//' /IS g 7 e Wheeler, Fire hief DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC • McClincy's Addition • LUA-97-035,SA,ECF ERC Signature Sheet, Page 2 ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL(COMBINED COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIOD) Environmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 13, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written-comments.-After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds'there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor City of Renton Development Services Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process. Appeals of either the I environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC.197-11-680] and/or the land use decision.must be filed in I writing on or before 5:00 PM May 13, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-035,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Mr. Timothy McClincy PROJECT NAME: McClincy's Addition DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Mr. Timothy McClincy, seeks Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) and Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA) to construct an addition onto an existing business. The addition will include a storage area, showroom, and two apartment units. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4604 NE 4th Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall prepare and submit a Temporary Erosion Control Management Plan to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. The erosion control measures contained within this plan shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Development Services representative during the entire construction phase of the project. 2. The applicant shall provide a Transportation Impact Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per new trip generated by the proposed development. The applicant shall submit the fee prior to the issuance of construction/building permits. 3. The applicant shall limit construction activities to the hours between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged with the Development Services Division but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday Construction. 4. The applicant shall submit a Parks Mitigation fee of$354.51 per unit. The applicant shall submit this fee prior to the issuance of building/construction permits. 5. The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation Fee of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-035,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Mr.Timothy McClincy PROJECT NAME: McClincy's Addition DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Mr. Timothy McClincy, seeks Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) and Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA) to construct an addition onto an existing business. The addition will include a storage area, showroom, and two apartment units. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4604 NE 4th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General Notes 1. Garbage and recyclabledeposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 2. The applicant will need to submit sign permit applications for all new signage. 3. The applicant will need to obtain easements for any off-site work on private property. Community Services Department 1. Recommend deciduous street trees along NE 4th Street in place of or along with Blue Carpet Juniper, species of the street tree will need to be coordinated with the Parks Division. Fire Prevention Bureau 1. The preliminary required fire flow is 3750 GPM. Four fire hydrants are required, one within 150 feet of the building and three within 300 feet of the building. 2. The building remodel shall meet all adopted codes related to the occupancy uses. Water Utility 1. The System Development Charge (SDC)shall be at the current rate of$0.113 per square foot of property(12,258 square feet). This fee is subject to a redevelopment credit. 2. Individual meters for the additional apartments is required. SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.078 per square foot of property (12,258). 2. The property is required to be connected to sanitary sewer. A manhole is available for connection within the property frontage. McClincy's Addition LUA-97-035,SA,ECF Advisory Notes (Continued) SURFACE WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious area of property (6758 per plans). PLAN REVIEW-GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE APRIL 22, 1997 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Sa Chastain, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jim Hanson & Mike Kattermann Meeting'Date: Tuesday, April 22, 1997 y Time: 9:00 AM Location: Third Floor Conference Room Agenda listed below. McClincy's Addition (new) (Pywell/5586) LUA-97-035,SA,ECF The applicant, Mr. Timothy McClincy, seeks Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) and Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA) to construct an addition onto an existing business. The addition will include a storage area, showroom, and two apartment units. Location: 4604 NE 4th. Boeing Intercepter (new) (Pywell/5586) LUA-97-038,ECF,SM Applicant, The Boeing Company, seeks Environmental Review approval and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to install 3,862 linear feet of storm water pipe along the east side of the Cedar River Park. Location: The project will extend from a point 500 feet South of North Sixth Street to the existing Boathouse. CO Zone Amendment/Jails & Hotels (new)_ (Dennison/2475) LUA-97-039,ECF This is a City of Renton proposed amendment to the Renton Zoning Code to allow municipal jails as a primary permitted use and hotels as a secondary use in the Commercial Office Zone (CO). Location: Commercial Zones. cc: J.Covington,Executive Assistant to the Mayor AGENDA.DOC L.Warren,City Attorney (R) F.Kaufman,Hearing Examiner S.Carlson,Economic Development Director (R) J.Gray, Fire Prevention A. Larson,Fire P. Pierce,P/B/PW Admin. e.I City ur rienton Department of Planning/Building/F Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: tk14Ce,. COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 7, 1997 ;APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-035,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 24, 1997 ;APPLICANT` TIMOTHY McCLINCY PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL ;PROJECT TITLE: McClincy's Addition WORK ORDER NO: 78195 ;LOCATION: 4604 NE 4th !SITE AREA: 12,258 Sq.Ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): 2,800 Sq.Ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 7,940 Sq.Ft. ;SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Checklist Review(ECF) and Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA)for construction ;of an addition onto an existing business. The addition will include a storage area, showroom and two apartment units. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g..Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare • Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services. Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation • Airport Environment ° 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS I We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad 'tional information is needed to properly ass-- this proposal. 'Signatur f Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Rentoni)epartment of Planning /Building_ Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) An additional 4.10 police calls for service estimated annually, based on the square footage of the new addition portion of this development. 1.84 calls for service estimated annually based on the two new apartment units to be located in this addition. Construction Phase: Theft of building materials during this phase should be a concern. During the construction phase, security fencing and lighting is strongly recommended to deter crime. Any and all building materials and tools will need to be locked up when not in use, especially during the hours of darkness. The use of a private security patrol of of duty officers is recommended as auxiliary security if you experience problems. Lighting: Proper lighting is recommended at all entries to the building from the outside. All stairwells inside of the addition leading to each floor needs to be properly lit throughout the stairwell. Adequately light all exterior sides of your business (including ramp areas) and the parking lot using vandal-resistant fixtures. Lighting serves as one of the most important deterrents to burglars. Locks/Security Devices: All doors need to be solid core (preferably metal)with single cylinder deadbolts on each with no less then a 1" throw when bolted. Peepholes should also be provided on each door. It's suggested that latch guards be installed on the exterior of all doors leading into the building. This will help deter burglars from attempting to pry open the doors. Stairwells: Not only is proper lighting needed for theses areas, but it's suggested that the stairwells themselves be constructed of metal railings or lattice - not a solid panel type construction that would hinder surveillance of someone using the stairs. Access: There should be limited access to the building itself Either electronic door locks should be used or some sort of security measure should be taken in order to keep out those that do not belong in the building or possible burglars that may desire access to the second story apartments. If customers have access to the showroom without supervision, their movement should be restricted and electronic locks should be on the second landing as well. /"� City'__ 'enton Department of Planning/Building/F Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:ents rIA S2lr1LGC 1 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 7, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-035,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 24, 1997 (APPLICANT: TIMOTHY McCLINCY PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL � r%.411� ,PROJECT TITLE: McClincy's Addition WORK ORDER NO: 78195 �"•�.- . fQ,9� LOCATION: 4604 NE 4th �r y� ...I�� . SITE AREA: 12,258 Sq.Ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): 2,800Sq.Ft. 6iO4/ BUILDING.AREA(new expansion gross): 7,940 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Checklist Review(ECF) and Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA)for construction of an addition onto an existing business. The addition will include a storage area, showroom and two apartment units. • A. ENVIRONMENTAL.IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural _ Natural Resources Preservation • Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS I . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed is a•;.lication w' particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional if /al• e d p openly assess this proposal. 3 - 26 -q7 ; • Signature of Direc or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City '_ enton Department of Planning/Building/FL,j Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: th JAL& COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 7, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-035,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 24, 1997 / •l;y� 'APPLICANT: TIMOTHY McCLINCY PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL _ Vs �y�n�. PROJECT TITLE: McClincy's Addition WORK ORDER NO: 78195 � wyl��'� • LOCATION: 4604 NE 4th 1SITE AREA: 12,258 Sq.Ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): 2,800 Sq.Ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 7,940 Sq.Ft. ;SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Checklist Review(ECF) and Administrative Site Plan Approval(SA)for construction of an addition onto an existing business. The addition will include a storage area, showroom and two apartment units. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts .Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health • Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation • Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS )4miczee, 4v, 4c:_jg • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS �Q We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informationSop is needed to properly}assess this proposal. a� Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC p Rev.10/93 KENTON FIRE DEPT r :-IThITION! BUREAU City_. ..enton Department of Planning/Building/P -__; Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONMit / E1I 7SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: `lrc, Fireuejtnil COMMENTS DUE: APRILy7; 971CI VED • APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-035,SA,ECF • DATE CIRCULATED: .MARCH 24, 1997 APPLICANT: TIMOTHY McCLINCY PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: McClincy's Addition WORK ORDER NO: 78195 LOCATION: 4604 NE 4th SITE AREA: 12,258 Sq.Ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): 2,800 Sq.Ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 7,940 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: - Environmental Checklist Review(ECF)and Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA)for construction of an addition onto an existing business. The addition will include a storage area, showroom and two apartment units. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS • • Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the • Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LightGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use • Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ • Historic/Cultural • • Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment • 10,000 Feet ` I� 14,000 Feet,,II N. 4a o r Xrn104c fs /Uo • 7i • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS bl • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS S'e e a T/aeA cot 0,44m exi • We have revie ed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition I information is nee :d to properly assess this proposal. Signature Director or Authorized 'epr;tentative Date DEVAPP.D Rev.10/93 ti`cY g + CITY OF RENTON \Il k\NTo FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: March 26, 1997 TO: Mark Pywell, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: McClincy's Home Decorating, 4604 NE 4th St. Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary required fire flow is 3750 GPM. Four fire hydrants are • required, one within 150 of the building and three within 300 feet of the building. 2. A fire mitigation fee is required for the additional square footage at $.52 a square foot for a total of$2558.92. 3. The building remodel shall meet all adopted codes related to the occupancy uses. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. . CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: April 2, 1997 To: Mark Pywell From: Kayren K. Kittrick, Plan Review Subject: McClincy's Addition LUA-97-035, SA, ECF EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER - There is an existing 12-inch diameter water line located in NE 4th Street. One hydrant is within 150 feet of the existing building. One additional hydrant may be located within 300 feet, subject to verification. Fire flow is modeled at approximately 4000 gpm, with a static pressure of 75 psi. SEWER- The East Renton Interceptor is located in NE 4th Street along the entire frontage of the proposed project. The site is currently not connected to sanitary sewer. STORM - The existing site drainage is to the rear of the property into natural channels picked up in the street system downstream. The front drainage for the parking areas and roof drains are to the city system. STREETS - Street lighting, paving, curb and gutter, and sidewalk exist along 'NE 4th Street, but may require repair during the construction project. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The System Development Charge (SDC) shall be at the current rate of $0.113 per square foot of property (12,258 square feet). This fee is subject to a redevelopment credit. 2. Individual meters for the additional apartments is required. SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.078 per square foot of property (12,258). 2. The property is required to be connected to sanitary sewer. A manhole is available for connection within the property frontage. • MCCLINGF.DOC SURFACE WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.129 per square foot of new impervious area of property (6758 per plans). 2. Water quality for the paved areas may be required if the low areas are considered sensitive or wetlands. TRANSPORTATION 1. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per Average Daily Additional Trip shall be assessed. This fee has been calculated in accordance with the ITE Trip Generation Manual for a fee of$1260. PLAN REVIEW- GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. CC: Neil Watts MCCLINGF.DOC City !en ton Department of Planning/Building/I Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:auface,e, I.VQ.SrtewM.le' COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 7, 1997 i APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-035,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 24, PAY 0FRENTON APPLICANT: TIMOTHY MCCLINCY PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYW LL i PROJECT TITLE: McClincy's Addition WORK ORDER.NO: 78195 4 2 5 1997 LOCATION: 4604 NE 4th L.su• ,,;,, SITE AREA: 12,258 Sq.Ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): 2,800 Sq.Ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 7,940 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Checklist Review(ECF).and Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA)for construction of an addition onto an existing business. The addition will include a storage area, showroom and two apartment units. • A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural • Natural Resources . Preservation • Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ' B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS G'ONMEGT1W) /7 A)07141/ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. S n,"(/`',re of Director or Authorized Representative Date// DEV� P.DOC Rev.10/93 City . i'enton Department of Planning/Building/f Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHE.ET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT' s1:05y^rata-v\ • COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 7, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-035,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 24, 1997CIfl. ,APPLICANT: TIMOTHY McCLINCY PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL ?�DL ,ON PROJECT TITLE: McClincy's Addition WORK ORDER NO: 78195 NAR 2 LOCATION: 4604 NE 4th t►tL,,, ,fig, SITE AREA: 12,258 Sq.Ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): 2,800 Sq.Ft. V'rVio BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 7,940 Sq.Ft. N 1 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Checklist Review(ECF) and Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA)for construction 'of an addition onto an existing business. The addition will include a storage area, showroom and two apartment units. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing • Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 7FFI ' in)�qpT1oN F6� B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • I • C. . CODE-RELATED COMMENTS - • --- Ne1710 bA7EZ VA41 7 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. I ,,,, e 7 ,.?vick Sig fi a of Director or Authorized Representative Date z//2/77 DEV/ DOC i Rev.10/93 RENTON FIRE DEPT F,:._ "FVENTION BUREAU City . -1enton Department of Planning/Building/I-- :Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION RENME21A5IteilEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Tl --ReV i u� w COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 7, 1 7 ,LiCi VEU) APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-035,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 24, 1997 • APPLICANT: TIMOTHY McCLINCY PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: McClincy's Addition WORK ORDER NO: 78195 ^."?-1'^ -Arr LOCATION: 4604 NE 4th " � SITE AREA: 12,258 Sq.Ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): 2,800 Sq.Ft.• 4 6 BUILDING AREA(new expansion // P $����� 40 Sq.Ff.997 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Checklist Review(ECF) and Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA`.1f�l traction of an addition onto an existing business. The addition will include a storage area, showroom and two apartment units. "0N . A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS . Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the . Probable Probable. More Environment. Minor Major Information .Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals. Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 5EE mew° L/r 4/1/4./9 7 I We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas i where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. 1 • Sig at of Director or Authorized Representative Dat DEVAPr. OC Rev.10/93 W. Lucker architect ..EVELOPE George rir h _.NT Pf gNNING MAR 2 !/ 7 p L� 907 March 18, 1997 MITIGATION OF POSSIBLE CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS Project: Addition and Alterations to an Existing Building For McClincy' s Home Decorating Co . 4604 NE 4th St Renton, Washington Prepared By: GeorgeArchitect ' 4 p W. Lucker, REGISTE 1;1 pi; \ ARC .T 1506 First Avenue South tif Seattle , Washington 98134 -fillGEO i, STAT C` Tel: (206) 682 4147 `— FAX: (206) 682 4548 Scope of Project: Wood frame, two story and basement addition and alteration to street elevation of existing bldg. Basement addition for storage 1733 s . f. First floor showroom addition 1829 s . f. Second floor -- Two dwelling units 1816 s . f. New parking area. Construction Schedule: Late spring/summer, 1997 ; 120 day duration from start to substantial completion. Hours of operation: Between hours of 7 : 00 AM to 6: 00 PM, PDT. Hauling/Transportation Routes : Materials hauled to and from site will be routed over main arterials . Building debris and excess dirt to authorized fill sites . Continued cnR Firet AVP_n11P Rettith_ SPattIP_ WA AR134 7nR RR7 - 4147 Mitigation of posp4ble .impacts, continued Page 2, of 2 McClincy' s Home Decorating Co . 4604 - NE 4th St Renton, Washington Traffic Impacts : Hauling to and from the site shall be of short duration and spaced to avoid adverse traffic impact. Loads to be covered to avoid dust and spillage on .streets Dust/Mud/Erosion: Refer to EROSION CONTROL NOTES on Drainage/ Utility plan sheet, (C-1) . Erosion control controls will be in effect during vulnerable periods . Mud to be removed from vehicles be- fore entering city streets . Noise, Odors : Medium to small sized equipment will be em- ployed. All equipment will be with exhaust mufflers . Use of heavy equipment will be of short duration. Odors generated from construction processes cannot be avoided, such as roofing and asph- alt paving. These jobs will be done quickly to limit exposure . • r [ GEM—W.LUCKS DATE _- _ PAGE OF ..\ I MUT 1508 First Ave.South ENGINEEk: Seattle,WA 98134 ' . SUBJECT• . -- - - • • \:115.1.._ 206 682-4147 FAX 206 682=4.546 I DEVELOPMEArr P 'I :Project Memo , C 17's ' I.AAAnivG D OVPILar M ai< Veo'N I(C'e RAR 2 7 1997 , REC . .. _ _. _ ._ _ . .. . _ . EvEL). . . i4-5-- 4--tii. 711- - et-4t.1 4 epteevx(--yi-vtpct•uAoris4.0 Izeriall * LU A97 e). 5 - - • A4919 clicx-1, -- 0001•11-ATP---e-tAt-z - F-r--6eL"cae-Q c- . P---e,P042-at-v-av AteL-tis.-lit 1 - _copy t-40!.10 ,?-,. op . mw :. 2. t — ce vs,/ (,-rr gi40 5t-oa.ar- ( c•10 1) . . L At,19 'co ti.lco. ri....6.1,1 C. "".1) 4,, 1- Copy Aizeity4t-foc--ru4c., ta_.42A-t-tiot-As (140.5) - . : G. '1,..1*--1,--410.",r..5. , ---fre-4, ,--;;••,:-. ... ....---:.-- .p;iim,.... ----* — . ( - riWr . f1P- Urtuvr-y713;124tut-aA&E._ FL,p4.1 (C.-1) 7. (I e.., r%V... Get49rp,uc4-1c7t1/41 &A:n°(1,1 006 cg.t,ri-tept , 1 ' . . 0 .",1 Oat- •- 17n R EI.TO N>€:;<:1<:'�:<€:>1:'::<:€<:>:>� <<;:::><:':<'«<::<:::>>:>::::<: :::;:<<`.:::::ti::s>«>:: .:: ;IVISION»< :NON <V'" > < MIM -.. E.VELOFIVIENT�':SEFt\flCESDI....tS 0 U : DIN .E fl ` 5 RR N G� F P OWIVE :»>:<:::«:::»::»»>::>::>::::>::>:>:>:::<:<;::>:::::>::::>::::::»<>::<:>.::::::::>:::<>.>::::>:«:>:withoi0eeet. .the:sub ect.s t ...... ........ sapisonso PROJECT NAME: hDPC1101.1 -t•b MG0i-1N6y 4oti teepRicrIt40 Co. 4604 - t-le 4"1' 5-s APPLICATION NO: LUP%91- 035 , SPN I et The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. .The Development Services. Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS to ASSESSOR'S PARCEL • /145 NUMBER f: ��-r--�--�- Laurie__C.r�rbetl�__... .--12�0-25-�-►�(....S�c_ - - - _ 1 ."..:_.. .. . .1 556tiuctk, twA 6( 027 . w 23.05-- _q ogc 2... RIGaar'ti. .0___.CO-w431.---. ._. . 4514 ,_14e . . ..ert - -- - -- - .., -- 3 ' vinkvy‘ 'E'h1 veto h to — - - d_ Vvtiarndg,--hV.a_. G80 2.o .t5 2?�0 5 a l'. 4; ,G M A tat& __. ___. l_125__--(64 ,Ave `J - .._.....- •- = .. . ea!{-t WA `i$108 10:23 ,5• :1 o.6.c •5. La.er•0 5litaroh Gr('ffkin t3 so' t. SE 11-544 S't- . ._ .,..„, • _ _ •AXW12'('e M-•-g-I Ck 0.. 4-8:_ -tr✓_-e,4_ St _ r- - 'r • _ ,-:_ • Red'.._ .. -WA. lS 7 pcng,-Eai- -ye Kyun aS a3 -1,7 -Gad,-1-- Y`61 ISVe-5(7W __-----..23os Seattle WA 01813� Joel p. _._c.)ac,ksorn .10'3 �rw.eaiiler -9 . v-.-------__.- -__-___ B ellevu e-_WA _a Soo. ?2 2 7 00 0o t o 9.Clnavles ertce--;lvtib • - , .. ecttH.e. VJA-_gE115.... ..... ... ...._ .. . . Lc°2'3.-n5 .9.1t"1 N% • 44042.1 5t Lakes IAJt k �s n .-..._ �,G es °Y be go ���• �o .--,, c), ,, __ Matte--.alley._. wA 0.3 102.. 05. ...... __-- . ;\E 5tio2'' -5"� t av�Ol"...St . - , • S eatl(� W A °l P>1 s l0, 23 OS 13 03 (- .... (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) Cc,h-1-111oed e Ccrr '1 h Ucc+toh c , 1. (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • • Applicant Certification I, / l'M/N M .J c. , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: • C] City of Renton Technical Services Records Title Company Records • [] King County Assessors Records' Signed 4ii ,/7( 4 ,Date < • (Applic • NOTARY ATTESTED: -Sy scribed and sworn before me, allotary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at _.• '}-�� on the 56, day of CSC , 1997 . Signed % I • (Notary Public) • oC o en on t Us »:::ERTIEI>::ATI:<.::>:» >::::::;>:;:>:::>:::«:::>:>::>:<::'€ C NOF..M I I 119412 , "`::.'': eret%V:.:certi.: :.:.that notices of::the.. ro osed'>a lication.::were..>mailed.>. a;.:.>::>::>:<:>::::: • i E o.............. .............. :::;:::::::::::t::?£::>•:;::�:::<i::::::;!:;.:::r::::::;<;:::::::�;:�:;:::::%%::;:5:#: •';.:: ::;:%;:;:;:::r;:;;••::..;:s::•::..y:.;•:::::::::'t;:.+.`•5:::;'t::::c::::::::::::;;:;'f:;ii:::%::i5:::::::::::::::::::::::::: :•r:::::::::+$ ::;:;:;::;$;::::r::5`:;>:::::>.::::::>::r�:;:r;': `�. ' . •:::::::>:;.:;::;:.;:.;:<.;;;:.;:<.:;:.: 9 � }iiiii:iC;�i:'r::ii:::j,'.i:�:::Si:}:j•:: .............:....:......................................................... ... . . . ATTE ST;::• an w r .................. ............................... ..:.... ...... u d d s o n.before'.".:.e'�'::a:l\Jo•�a:;:;>:p•:. .I..;:..�:�::�:.,:.:::.,..,•:•.:::.,.:..;�:.., .._:.,.;::.>>••..��::::::.::;:.>::;::;:.;;;::.;:.:_„;.,;;;; .::.:;::.;:.;:.::<.:;:.:.:::;:::;::::<.; .,::::::::..:::::;:.;:::.::;;:.:::.:;::.:::;.;:;.:::.::.:::::..:;;�!.::.:>;.::::.::.;:..:�.::ry....ub ic,a nd for he State•of'4'V�.$hmgton.:..,...:: es.d.... t.... ....:..... REV 07/95 /q7q" 2 .Goo- t Prlc 4�F'f/ m •I . LIST' oe ' g.120U+4-1Dlt1& • `9- . c ►yit_tern! v 4(d04- We- 4-i 0 L -F>n J�e ._ N�.o-nt�bm2ry - �52(0 -- -NE- •Ldr ge-vAziel WA.-- _61.8059" l0 23 05 ` (n. 7 Sty - - -- - . .• -- Rend► WA 8"059 722- 7 od oo2c. 14 -:Ca-(+9 -"fa le er 3(02.e4. 5E _ Fc41- Nal-chery_ Rd - • - Fall & - WA. 1Sb 4- 0 : . gps4 :Virg : er5. - 45 zs NE 4- 5.r . . Rsnkvn WA clSos9 - __. .- IS 23 o5 16.• :Aldo a:tor.i►i• coo - N --4*1 ST _ i; wa, ct-g o5.9 _ .A5 2 3 o s f o2 • ." �7• ' S-Inr�le y Sca a-ni 4(Pc) - NE 4 _ST_ - - - - �: c514. - 1-7co 8 -— NE 2 0 1- • - ;f02 0 047 • l027305 955I try - - �G� 5 l3 - - - - Se -1/1/4I4. 018 ['O. 1_O2305 ao� .'1 1 1 Y is WI N,Nrro, 1 1 • NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON 1 An Application for Environmental Checklist Review(ECF) and Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA) has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. • PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: McCLINCY'S ADDITION /LUA-97-035,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Mr. Timothy McClincy, seeks Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) and Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA) to construct an addition onto an existing business. The addition will include a storage area, showroom, and two apartment units. GENERAL LOCATION: 4604 NE 4th PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please,include the project • NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. L II OA 5"51 P II 0' 12-•2.1 R'24 IzIl ,,-za 0-J• I i' ® C9 ,. c,. 1I. ii i c-5 4 L h , 1 , ®I' I r e% .' I; c 9 ew4 VON q ii Pi 1 ` „6t. EIS ' n ` i {'I u e 1 U 1 1 ...4.1i ..., y i ,.„ , 'r$ L , 4 d , v i t✓-mN•rol.GoRP.u.i MArTI NS Au4 I /\ .t-..,..-J....._ loon: ulivL••O. .— ..�..u_.'�6 1 NW* ,!,II.EIGNBOR— _ go9rA4 aft I:NnIr x,� �. 4,.• re•e�s •� ! HOOD a 1 pp ( an a9 Be.r,,,,-- • iii =YF ,!MV.I.MCf •ta GENMALOT.I J .r,i t� .i . — :..._ ' ' r. .4 rl� v" 1 I �y�0 �r' 4 PENDING APPLICATION . . PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: McCLINCY'S ADDITION/LUA-97-035,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION The applicant,Mr.Timothy McClincy,seeks Environmental Checklist Review (ECF)and Administrative Site Plan Approval(SA)to construct an addition onto an existing business. The addition will include a storage area,showroom,and two apartment units. GENERAL LOCATION: 4604 NE 41h PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit _Preliminary Plat _Short Plat • Conditional Use Permit Rezone XXXX Administrative Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review _Shoreline Conditional Use _Other Permit Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other ' I Development Permit • • The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings.or prior to an administrative site plan approval.Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's-Notice of Application'publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application,or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations,appeal periods and/or the public heanng date(s)for this project,please contact the Development Services Division al 235-2550. - I 1 • • C.u ¢ 9 -' roji p'S r'II . I 'Y L.S II I 1 - I -°l li',L�, w m 6 III ce '. i_ , — — - !. f ,h 4 a.•,a Imo- l 1.j 4 ��` { I!' v 'f' '• fir . ,. LI , ii-,-:_.•:-',,,,.1.11,:;-,t4,4;•17..__ .,<1...-;:l• ml ,I. . PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. . I CERTIFICATION . • I, 14h )4.C -soY1 , hereby certify that 3 copies•of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on Signed: Sl -- 9 � . • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) • • certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that .5�1.i),/ ° ' '' signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and v i4un er fact for.the uses , and purposes mentioned in the instrument. c. r p stl ti'7y Dated: 3/Zgiq 1 ,, �tf�C , a°s4�ih` • Notary Pub in and fihe Sta te..Xvi .9ton Notary (Print) -i2 y- �.''ra� ,� My appointment expires: 6 /Mk • NO TAR Y.00C PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: McCLINCY'S ADDITION/LUA-97-035,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Mr. Timothy McClincy, seeks Environmental Checklist Review (ECF)and Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA)to construct an addition onto an existing business. The addition will include a storage area,showroom,and two apartment units. I - GENERAL LOCATION: 4604 NE 4th PUBLIC APPROVALS: . 1 Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat I Conditional Use Permit Rezone XXXX Administrative Site Plan Approval • XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use Other Permit i l Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other I Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings, during Public.Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's"Notice of Application': publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. ® 1 C o 0 eI IR. I, _Al2a iI ' I) 0 .-'7!. • 17 6 RN O-b .!I . ' c.5 I 6 I -1 W :e:o 1, t; C9 '5". 1• .. I;i' �6' ' I I423.3 V� I es v ® 1 :1` • l• n _.-_ ;,.; i5Z.i$-I� 707 aEBE; Rf ;� p? dI M2 Tl 5 Acli4 •P RENTel CoRP un� • �.,/t\,. ®.-_...... Tyr .unu a• i c • Nw ' EIGNBOR- na rat ay.LM; / i}•- ,..aM4 , !'I HOW MAP 1,;:n 7 a 5 }�MraNcy gme. - �.... +eot W af+ '1 Ir7 fl 1F^r1' -..r= ...m. a no :S PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION.:. CITX )F RENTON NAL ( N,), Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 24, 1997 Mr. George Lucker Architect 1506 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98134 SUBJECT: McClincy's Addition Project No. LUA-97-035,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Lucker: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application for Administrative Site Approval (SA) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on April 22, 1997. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at 277-5586, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 0141/ Mark R. P I, AICP Project Manager cc: Mr. Timothy McClincy/Property Owner ACCPTLTR DOC 200 Miiii Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ©t,This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer • S ER . .. PP • >::::::>::>::;:««;;;;:.:;:;:.;;:::>;»::: :... ... .. R ......O. ............ . ::><:<::;<:::>:<:>:::<::::>::>::>:::P.ROJECT:il • • :•::: -„•:«:..�;:.::::::;;::::. :>: >:>::>:.>::::>::<:>:>::::>:<::.::..:...::.... ..................... ( .)................................... ....... . . ...... :. N F.O RMATI.O N.................:............ • • :Note. if there`;is more;;than,'one le al:,ownerR .lease:attach an'additional 9 P notait'iga Mast er..Appl` ti:8.:icA&... a6fM4nr:: ..... <.d0;::>:€1.::;;:>::>::gi PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: Tte1404�Yll' W. M C'�i 1(�c,,d) ,2S rtct�l -{o MGGlIVICs� -pY�Le_ JJ bec-A'a-h,0 1Go. PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 46,04s — tuff 4+h sT 4 • Rer toil CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): f en-t-ovL NA eo59 to 23 a5 too ' TELEPHONE NUMBER: loco �O _ 8825 EXISTING LAND USE(S): 5 1 1 1___( 5•` (JlJ (�u rtabrv- • W� -tuJe.tlin3 NAME: PROPOSED LAND USES: G (,.dr. add -moo dL.. U 4 Gwd- Y'& it-ed Qal-kiM COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Center Gju urkah Cs ADDRESS: • PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): NA CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: Center Subur1crh -- C. 5 • TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): • > '«CON.T'. .012.0...0. NA 1, ' I 1 l SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): O J NAME: & e F Vv • -0 L1<e Af-C-h .G1 (2, 258 COMPANY(if applicable): NIA PROJECT VALUE:4217 OG 9 106/1•odw 5({e .work of-fscfe_ worl<- riec cal/ �levt-Y'i cat avtd bu tldti�y corl5firuvi c lon. ADDRESS: (SOC'J^ f<I •b a ' IS ht�A T W THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTEC ED 1g 3 1997 CITY: �TI e_ Y` I A ZIP: f e i' * IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF LL�Rcf�1L hi lctvAlL2.RkNll4( SENSITIVE AREA? CITY 1 OF RENTON TELEPHONE NUMBER: n (08e 4147 • < < LEG »,::.:.:.:<;.;:<:>:<;>::>;;;>:. °;�P _E <Y<_> ;<: <: :>>:;;, ...DES RI PZ._.V'O F...... R. .. .. /attach e r ...:.:..,. e.. . • r•. `r h e We s-E. 70-feet of tine-& ► xfc'i t-75 feet of d-lvz 5outi 2(7-+eet of tile Thal-F o-4 the Sou-i-huJes't 1/¢of +1ie sou-Hieast o-f.-the V1-I�.Wes 1 Of. Sec-1-1 c i i o, —tawv)sG) p 2.3 i or+h , �a�9e 5 Pc t, trsl, M, in Ivl CoLoh+y, WashIn3--oh; except that pov`l"(o1 there CohveJed € k(3 Couvrij ( 28 ) St , Sy Iv►s-l-ru e,n-L recorded uhd.-r rec.ordit vlumtoor 7To 5 0 2., rem 1d5 of said coon . ................. . ...... .... ... ..................... ........... . .......... .................. ..... :::TYP .OF..APPLI.CATION `& FEES > ::::> '« >:> > <> >> :> : :': < :: ::<: : _ ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: • _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ SONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ ITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT _ $ (NO. CU. YDS: 1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: • ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ FINAL _ WETLAND PERMIT $ _ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: • _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge �_ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $_ REVISION $ > '`A►F.FI AVIT F OW I, (Print Name) 7 4. m 4nfc.1.1 ,declare that I am (please check one)(`the owner of the property involved in this application,_the authorized representative to act for tli a property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. M�/' ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public,in and Gl t ,V L for he State of C�..• residing at (N me of Owner/Representative P_A• � _- • , on the 5jr=day of 19Sa. • ( Ignature of Owner/Reptative) • (Si n ure of•Notary Public) . .........: lThls:<se.ction'>to>be::>com Iete:db. `!Staffk:: > <>"> <<>a:�: > <<i� :.;:;:....::.::.:.. ::.:: ....... •>::- ....................... ........................E.0 ......SA�>>'R::..S . .....CU..:�.< 'LA::;:�<:PP:s::s`P>>:;:>.>:'GR ;:: :::.::;: ,:;;;;:>::;..::::': :::'':::_:;::::;>;:.::;::»;:::::::...... .. A...CPA.. ....:.:.:..: :..::: .: .:.:.. .. . :...: ....: ..:.: ....... :: ::TOTALFEES: >:;; . .;:::;'>::;: ::»::;;:;::>.::>:::::»T. TAL;POSTA E::::.. V :; :::>:.;::. :.>::•>:: :•':: <.,.;: :.;;. .::..... S .... .. . 0.. G .::FROIRED $ .. ...: ..: MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 9/96 • George W. Lucker rchitect Dec. 16, 1996 ADDTION and ALTERATION to McCLINCY' S HONE DECORATING The project, situated at 4604 Northeast 4th Street, in the CS zone, proposes the expansion and remodeling of McClincy' s, established here in 1984. The site, 70 ft. by 175 ft. , 12,258 sq. ft. in area, is improved with a two story wood frame building, McClincy's occu- pies the ground floor of 1,872 sq. ft. ; an apartment unit, 884 sq.ft. occupies the second floor. Paved offstreet parking for five cars is located in front of the existing building with access by driveway from N E 4th St. The property is served by watermains, sanitary sewer, storm drain and a gas main. The proposed expansion is a two story and basement wood frame struct- ure with a footprint of 2,100 sqo ft. , including overhangs . The basement will provide storage for materials related to the business. The first floor will serve as an extention of the existing showroom. Two additional apartment units will be located on the second floor. The resulting structure will have a total footprint of 3,970 sq. ft. Resulting lot coverage will be 32,4 percent. 0ffstreet parking for eight cars, seven additional from th.e original five spaces noted above, will be located behind the building, access- ed by driveway from the existing parking area. A five foot landscap— ed beffer will abut a residential use, in the CS zone, west of the subject site. The existing street facade will be remodeled to upgrade the proper- ty consistent with new portions of the project. Highest elevation of the new structure will not exceed the height of the existing building; views, if any, of nearby residential units will not be obstructed by this proposal. RECEIVED MAR 1 8 1997•' DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON REGIST C '1 11EO•G . CK STATE OF WFcHINrTON 1506 First Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98134 206 682 - 4147 Environmental Checklist • A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: A• 2. Name of applicant: —i 1rn M c-Gl—tNccJ — °L ner 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: f C o.4}. Nita 414' 450- 6826 Con-fact P6-rscn — 6 e LU . I--o Ke►; In r�ct o - Fthsk ave So. Seat4 ,UJ4 `t814 -68e - 4147 4. Date checklist prepared: RECEIVED l9.6160 MAR 16 1997 5. Agency requesting checklist: DEVELOPMENT PLgNiv,,, Gc o-c � �(opvvten-�, ' V 6t ZS CITY OF RENTON • 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): FjV\ Ctsn ruc - Spri ‘.097 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. lid 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NI e 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. guticL,v5 Fer-nr+ 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Alkerart(To s and add(LA ) -Ev e Kis jr c o vn w>erctalA511244-tj 1 but III, ? % loll ,-two c (i u'acEr�; enlarq� exlsiiv9 Sh�owrbonn, Olds. St 60 s- G) S i 2e r.F rrojCd' -. eK&trw bfcq Area. 2&9 .. 'F. Ac,tdl+ ll s .4( 5S $'tie 1760 fr 9rss 4icwrin L%O S F c c.) feet'sae 12, 258 2 ay� ul�l� : units e,<c iuir l��o SF . i Environmental Checklist 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not . ...required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Address- 4(ov4- tJe- A-+1' SA'y RenficV S C t/.4 4 GU) t/qr of 'e - k o l 'T'. 23I4 `CZ 5 E Vl)• itA. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other12n+(e. Slope- c b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) '.3 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of.agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. &oval( aKdy (,Dawn USWA- 14GG Per USDA G:4l Survey IG)?3 ect d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. ((lo+ DoIfu, K,now a(a it VccAnc}l • e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. tradi . Q, si4e drive / 1941.1 .tf9 • - ;'; -hi. 210° sF -- Pal a2rwx -( SvIp-lay , eavtvty and Un . Iaa,SLIWA4+ sib • 4 a.zzepfut �uaNr Soule¢... f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some en9 or) posy►('(s_ jur103 C. i rdA-tavt; 41, b C to w -cl, Ty) 3 t te, eA-oSiOn404044sicr to t l( OCc,u r 0.s re s u It of ()S2.. . g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? �l n e Q� + 610 3 Environmental Checklist h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: e ro 5 to In terra. 6. IGa-2 94'o.dwj• l lo+e*t Pt s al, -etc c-ava+ed vvla rta 1 . C-arrf ro I t L-i worm 2. AIR • a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.;dust, automobile, ....odors,:industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If .any,•generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. short -t-erw► dust dturi CavtS}ruesh"lon. MP(nor a irrw(ot 0c ors„ auz-�o e II Seo r - rite-CA" o e-y- a mt551ohs Should result a-F�r P kvapw caw) . b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. '1,10r e. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Cv1410( dui durwv�Gsv).s4uc l,oln to arroW V14ahner, 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,.wetlands)? If yes; describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NOlL b�A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. • DNA 5) • Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. s0O 4 . Environmental Checklist 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. t•to DNA • b. Ground Water: 1) - :Will.ground water be withdrawn,.or will water be discharged to ground water? Give eneral description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N o �vrrn oL.-stgv� 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, .if any (for.example: Domestic sewage; industrial,: containing the-following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general'size.ofthe system;the"number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. - c. Water Runoff(including storm water): • 1) Describe the source of runoff. (including storm'water) and.method' of.collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? -If so, generally describe. (�o. — fJas U,Ja�er Se r z . - 4 ruNa—o - , pt1- Si It Se-par 1.csvt d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 12vh — wafer (S-tvrly► ()Jag-et) 1 1 C-01 tezAezi.i ol.e+ ►mod a.>. n.�- o u� t-t' - corbU a.€ -t o Fr.e.se,ni 1 Ud�-!'I 1-Les • . 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _ hrsbs d • I/ grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulirush, skunk cabbage, other water plants:water lily, eel grass, m lfoil,�otth Scrub lo,rtlSln. V other types of vegetation WTGk 1 b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Al( J>zc -haYi cn, uvl l yrak Forti rn ',,f s‘4e_ reouVa& 5 Environmental Checklist c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Bone. +9 our k-wbw d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Ex, 1 yt l.alna S ca`o►r►, -}a L. Vitli who[►(11-1-4 . • 5. ANIMALS a. :Circle any birds and animals which have been observed.on-or.near the.site-or•are known to be on or near the site: (see next page) Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other NI o - Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other N)a Fish: bass, salmon,trout, herring, shellfish, other +�10 b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or.near the site. Do i'i-o k- kn- ' c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, ex lain fa, lam+- V 11.4W C u1,ei I kA.ly d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES • a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used or heating, manufacturing, etc. 5j .y c,ri y ..., fi e,k / 4 5D ( ,-iiv1A (,qdl1 . �44.01�I 15 - tlt I b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Ni c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of-this proposal? List other proposed mea ures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Covnellaln62—IJ�tT►' 103 S i Coc-sz-- . >(Ge2d. GGd.e.. relDll^m ts. • 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 6 Environmental Checklist a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. i 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 11719 . 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: 1)5e7 not a 1191y b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,- equipment, operation, other)? '1i L 'I o e, o>r1 NE 4+h IS /ere at y bu - DA1( for at{.Fecr poste! t 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,-construction;:operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise,would come from the site. S60 t -f errvt rtolse- - irrY c -ucSYI o +1MS; e-Xcava 1ovi - rntv.ut eAYIog work. 11,04 rot-h14 Iriour5• Wurtr>g o t,t(svt o•. Slrt.2-S5J — `12a.� mint m *Di LrAJJ : �� „. o ,�rY,at Pic le. Ipu e. are srye 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noiseImpacts, if any. Co ck INAU, Iwl e 11[9ct re.5-tri 64141 dTerzyliorze-, {Ze*Wl irk- kLoot5 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the siterand,a djacent properties on 11>om - \noh.Q dt�. coe- uslh.2�5, c�well ► iu, vh ctck3o►.ee,rft,— Mkt!1 busi es b. Has the site beenYietorlture? If so, describe. 140 c. Describe any structures on the site. two wry Wd t -€17twt-e (oustVI . S Wo . rute< sheds. V d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Center �uIoul-loah (C S� _ - aY' Sc-�e avid )r roncit rop2r-keS f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Environmental Checklist g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. i. -Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 1=t\e pzrs� � would re ►de (Sn Stft. b. 5tx tpaseY15 w�c� wttl W or 1 . Ui C61 191214/ J c. ' j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Jore_,, k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: - 1:17e5 ter- 1_,y I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing.and projected 1` land uses and plans, if any: <i' ±Iv j w . VIA S beep -I;Or a\wto "r >✓l ► cars u tll ternary, cis I✓. free,em,t I-a?sid w e horl use. -tvo • t wl Il tiu(- be c vn aaedl anti mare. -Hum it h05 in -rka- fast, ex — cept-c,r storuie slttz_ots p (Me a th to ua.-wt(I tom. try rna�l�t 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. W o V h tb S VVi i I''L>:6YxL , b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: M 10. AESTHETICS - a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 3�f E Int -Cnsw' ,512-"- ' I•Io cliaric In wit( occur an Y'eet elztlak,c99. --�+ tvcco Ftrtly { (M errnatyt ai rted' rule/ rah ceramic-tor ft4/1-vrr- aye m s Strc el eva-ar. Pk d rco exi4ii41 recov&id tN it6 tololyd 5putlikti Bath b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 12/7 M a re, J nt 'ov-ini owl u poatl io.J exl` a 092 8 Environmental Checklist 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? ( loh+,S �°v^ 6,1 dfl1v� wtvt,d.owc— cae C L t4 1 \ t.5h4'1;3 1 tght- lea h-ls E r . b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? (doh ( oSu ) d. Prop sed measures t reduce or ontrol light and glare impacts, if any: - � _e_Otv ��4S a44a-ce44t Frcter+te,s- 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? • b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses?. If so, describe. O c. Proposed measures .to reduce or control impacts on.recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: oor- 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. o b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Prts F so- ,&f 7L—/o/ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Oar pet / 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. — NE .+h a-re&- , G.ez pirmw6carivwJ 9 • Environmental Checklist b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? �QS_ c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? -wekve:(12p d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,-or.improvements.to.existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe:(indicate whether.public or private? N, e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate .vicinity.:of) water,:::rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. I�n f. How many vehicular trips per day.would be?generated by the completed.project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. ` rl v?j bu5►y e- hours g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: v (Urr+a. 1'rarts f to a par+ ww kt-k- ac'Qiv�tv►*s a v►cc so rt' - . r055t�2 /Tad I l n tefte apt,rt war1-vmahcf (AL, WULet 5u re s .'Q.uS(bQA - -t-'r r s himit f ieb3 '- 15. PUBLIC SERVI� a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. �• — to Ala 1n9 L ex l k v,3 c.l`.S.sx.. . b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currentl available at the site:(electricit natural gas, water refuse servic- elephorr•, sanitary sewe , septic system, other. 10 Environmental Checklist - b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. 'Does ti- a l C. SIGNATURE .I, the.undersigned, state that to the best.of my knowledge the.above information is true and .. complete. It.-is.understood that the .lead agency may withdraw.any declaration of non- - significance that it might.issue in reliance upon this•checklist-should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: . -fl h Nl G t►YIG�( Date: g - � —17 .JJ 11 DRAINAGE REPORT McCLINCY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING BUILDING COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT PREPARED FOR: TIM McCLINCY McCLINCY'S HOME DECORATING 4604 NE 4TH RENTON, WA 98059 206/228-3427 SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SOUTH RENTON, WA 98056 PREPARED BY: ifs` i• . �.. ROBERT N. PARNELL, PE RN PARNELL COMPANY A - I z 4422- 187th PLACE SE " = - r5 ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 f� •� 19775 - w� 206/643-3560 r% ,c`QrsTE#ti cti� ;,`SfaNAL 4471 EXPIRES 8/17/.9 1 • FEBRUARY 25, 1997 RECEIVE MAR 1 $ 1997 pEVELOFNeN1 PUNNINO CITY OF RENTON ' / • • Page 1 of 2, -7/% O jP T7i✓ - TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND ' PART 2 -PROJECT LOCATION .,. t., AND'DESCRIPTION , ` • PROJECT ENGINEER • ;-zt Project Owner 774' /YJC CG/,c/e;• Project Name At L/./Ne r ;o4/T/OA) Address 1460%`� /Vg 0.57 E,V7 IV I Location • • Phone . .04/2. S-', 4.2 Township 2/ Project Engineer if 9E..e7 ./1/, I AJ'4 LL.. Range a.5- 5'24Ja Company RV/��c'�1/gh,c. Cy0/nA ,t ' Project Size Z ZS S 411 AC D„ I Address Phone 44ZZ --/8'7",L.C� 9g02 7 Upstream Drainage Basin Size (=,//>n 0 AC 0.137 ✓ PART 3.TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION PART4 OTHER PERMITS E-I Subdivision I I DOF/G HPA C Shoreline Management II I Short Subdivision I I COE 404 !! Rockery fi Gradingf i I! Structural Vaults DOE Dam Safety Commercial fi FEMA Floodplain L! Other . OtherC(244 v .e--e--✓e4- ///lvll46-51. //41 I 1 COE Wetlands fl HPA • / PART SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN 4.„'; Community 7/ry a/ /' '7 7// • Drainage Basin , f-- Z. PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS . I i River I I Floodplain I ] Stream • I I Wetlands I I Critical Stream Reach fI Seeps/Springs •I I Depressions/Swales I I High Groundwater Table FT Lake I j Groundwater Recharge I I Steep Slopes IX Other /51-4TI,4LL�i �.FV�LG',4e=/1F-he--ZV ✓ / r; Lakeside/Erosion Hazard PART T SOILS • , 1 Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities • ✓e y� c\I O - A" .54/�.C/7 Jam' 4,5/ ty:,''\\ AG' C. S-.- /% .”O.Dr e es-A- : e�'! .../ Additional Sheets Attatched • 1/90 • Page 2 of 2 -91 - erti-l-RtY-RH4lfil-ng-and-6arld-De'• ? TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS: :;;, ' REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT Ch.4-Downstream Analysis //O/v.` i 1 f I L_r-i • ii Additional Sheets Attatched . , / PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS ' V 1 MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION • Sedimentation Facilities ji. Stabilize Exposed Surface • I L Stabilized Construction Entrance Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities Perimeter Runoff Control iz Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Clearing and Grading Restrictions Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities Cover Practices I I Flag Limits of NGPES 2r Construction Sequence fl Other iU Other `-v PART 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM I I Grass Lined Channel I I Tank I I Infiltration Method of Analysis LJ Pipe System I I Vault I I Depression 1 i Open Channel I I Energy Dissapator Ti Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation I I Dry Pond = Wetland = Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage Wet Pond I Stream I I Regional Detention Brief Description of System Operation Facility Related Site Limitations [i Additional Sheets Attatched Reference Facility Limitation i PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PART 12 EASEMENTSITRACTS j/P t ft (May require special structural review) I Drainage Easement I I I Cast in Place Vault Ti Other f Access Easement Ti Retaining Wall 1 I Native Growth Protection Easement Ti Rockery>4'High n Tract I I Structural on Steep Slope Ti Other PART 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL.ENGINEER I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attatchments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided '-- _" ---' here is accurate. '~'sp^eciTr•,2 2...5--97 1/90 s a' sitivnd 41-2 - f i .s'ax/s. 40,/ „,,,7 - - - ,17 / IefI /ac d* x,baJ - ;cY1 ,a A �S'/ = -4C'P7,SZ X c ',M, oZ — r73•01,NQ j7V1//.?A o..Z .d�:o. trg D yx,r9,rtS (a/�!�-BMW/ V zr�ottL i/ c- - (` iy?6) , o1(\ .2dw( 'L /aSZI ( z ,53X,SZ -6,- -V Sno 11\- (zicl`4/ :re.J/ ,? 3 l\ iewo77 Cr'Eg1 v07 - ,- /-fr r y o1S scr Ls 1Y c-i c3I3 ✓cleiLS/X7 — Z1t'.xai2'D' 3I-c31/ 4' - r✓ ca../cif/ Sic- ' ci'07, oc <o'&7V 'i/ �/ yc,//,.2 S 1 z V/©-=-/ 79,r\ , 5 'o' . 0'tcr1/c-'$7 'p pt3 1;3/7\ Air 7/'a iN eiic:/ 766/ ,'rr,4- �' '!..e S/ x 77 ^ 'ter' /Y/ -6/_Ffl 0_2 ,�/-r o Z ' P73/Y ' a, 1-- / 6rd --- / — . cf ra' / fi- o ZG 8/ aSt}c3 — .Z(wA >0-9' 6 cvvc77/ 7 j?" I. p$s z '/. • -=1%eS` $Y//Sty 'I Z' 7 7,47Cu/c7-7/r>0 -76¢/ '.9 'G'1U. .5'C/(1 S! . AY/7� 2L1/ �� r'i7'i/7 fla/Y/7D fie// • 7, CCOiv `z) K3/oc/L7x'A7wL7 Po 7- ACOL.)/I L 1:79/ ; TH NEtx.) /;-41-4,[7.7 on..)A f/9-ieK[sur�fi � P.=-9- , 'e 7 1�I1 e-3 1/LtA E'Vro1,' . A - _ 5774_t �a Y&W/G?.,b" U.S ` rr.O 7"-#-/ vo co ' SV` =. i ce"7 / o 6?iuLy -4 �Cr/ ) 8_ 47- — 6 i / Foy-? -) /75 D.�. - d47 .9 ti 75'7( /7-5.// -Y ,/? S $c 9- .D)eA-![v Acj,E; E )S - �b..gl exisr,1t D[E'A-IwAr 1 S 1kt) p,e 27 og- 1301 L. A vn C-04,Z re. 0 F.: Z.) P egt • Z r Sro,e �) CA-TC - 1,2 -a t�'ooF/� v�sPTs e<24UItc7.- !,v 72 CRTchl- 4v/pb..4.1 )it)To C�tP7 ./To e_44 r'7 .) deV-Tied-.roil Aye_ Nor Fvuvlt. /;U cisTt�S p 144)47z wP pa/ern—SAC 77.1 OF 7U-01 LA/O • I S /144 'x,g. -< V1:f/'E'7 4 rfo.0 , r� [7g . G PZA-iNAgE PA•T7`k-10 .o J fitl i o &( Ci/.4 r'o' ,3' • fe07' r ,�9 ' C 'o9 r /0 t - seoroc /�.-4?o J7- is ,1 .pt- .5',,.--e% / ', ,1F19/A;�'i-6'. "' r / /eOA-,6--",, a-, /C .kvvie .,4 r s�,e4 y ,C13c err /,-,; \ c- Ord- ,e1-4r/G4/.A.,4 ), Or .4L E :-. 1,a.� .f9•4o. '1v4s7 St zli. C> "'/f• 2€ NF%v /°tee/c//j �f> �o��,,c, ? /t/.c-r,.) ,A.4,/.c..t/�'5 ,e` .�» '7/,' /N To nit-e‘) _CAT"UIf 13 ix) —G3 Z / ,-'T /NTo crs f.) O/SGN e' NO,eT�ie e . - -;. IX;:i j rr)Tb �zxiSTIw6 c i, -e' G70‘..?,e_sTe. NO e/D,e/,GTr4re0/4) / r:45/J//ems //Dray/Mr-' Z.27.re7 — 6.8 '/ 90 6/.2v c Zcrs .r4.e..et e -/£ o�' A/ r /VEw /41d'P.04v/ck.,1 —, q,/ /, ,xY� I- L/14 �0-//L�.6/IC j am,,,' m/T D d! , N6,670� /+ 4 7'0 /0 J,J ts'm `�u.4a, //271L_-4i l-D f'�- v 1 o E_ c)nJ ,C2OcrJJ'-,S,4ai zr"ol✓c.-» rei3 ir /1,.,,C/'7'.c,47 .. j,o 4 6.) de/}tJ€H�"-�- � P// ,c / 4..-vr.i ze_7 U /f 8// 01i4/m ,--, p/i r /i2/N/4i.e.,/, -•-•*'''.e.. �..✓; F-?GL. "ro 0,r,9/ate?-r,z. •,,-'4'Air • sz:7,0e o, 8"/vvc = ©.V33.5. U) Co, Tic- Ca /va7 /F/oV/4E0 Dog.. i o . SM14LC. /roper.j>Io/JS /-,2 q 14dvrJ 5N.4e_[_oe-t.) 17 EPT7-1 op cit./7 1-4.- f I AZ T°o /E.x,r 71k jV4T7J4-4(--- lJ,re.-, 0A#'f= • /•'‘. Ov,"ag L dy/.S, 6 PRo`l I O€D,,-,6 pV C E.16-04; TL/e vr� D 04.4),2) K) 0/SeN-. .7T y,oTJ,e.4c- Loc oTtcit.9 ,4✓7/7cAt /z ' "IT No,C�r F ,ct./c 0 ec- S'►r,_ 1-.) €Oeo.53.00 CoNTIcoL To //eou14=p Avvez (fie-L A GC.,�Aerif"j C/rs-1 t TS Ca/.,E relicTT o.:a GIN ff / �o r e ey e ram_ C ke /oso co oref,C_00-r s) . ni) Corns T,eJ c 77 0A2 S EQ/..) -ic e CfMO 47 o,-0 P LA lv S, { & ND Sr'-2Si77 vPE_ /7e= $l - c/4'77-e.9. 'x S'T. '=•34a.4 . /�� S`45,.0 /1o7 vfZ._ Pia o/'-/ /TE-./ • o) G'o,P •eCfL/GC,,,%= Ji-S (/-.5 1.977-1Gy .q) - CJ/& (1. . OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE Surface Water Design Manual, Core Requirement #2 �' Subbasin Name: .-� .�.p. n v`�/�/,/-�-off.. Subbasin Number: Basin: ��'D.a-� , 11l�`,�.._ otential ::::.:: 'Observations;of.field;.inspector I.:.. ..:. ,:::<: i lance><: :< `;':�xistiii :::'::>`; >'.: . P.. . S mbol ;<;::.:!I:::Drainage ' .>.: .: Drainage Component;::::;«: S.,ope. .;:.:<:p.s......: .:::;::. ...;, : .. ..; g ;:.::... .>:::::..:, :. :.::: :;:; . .;:::>:::;>. ... lems:: :`:,: : resource:reviewer, or,resident .. . .. .. :«::.::>:: _ ::>:<:>:::>:: �<::from::slte>:::.>:: ; >:<:Problems:;:::::.. :::;::;;::Prob. .:::: ::::.: .Cam onent:T a :: .:......:.:..:..::.DesCrl lion .�:.:.�: .:.::..: :::::;:::::::::::i.... .:::;. ..:.:. :;::.:: :>::-<::_; :>: :::: .:::' ::<` '<;'.:>::,:-.. ::'::' d i s c h a r'e: <>< s:;:giii>`:> :: • :::>>.:;;:"i"Wi :: :< .:::::::.:. . :::.<:::::::::<:::: .>:::; ;''::': >::;.::::: ..:;:: :.. ::.Name,.and.Size.::.. ... ::�::;::.>:: ..... ::::.:� �:. : �::�::: : ::... :;.:.,.., 9 st c s:u erca ac' �ndin ,: � .... ...... .......:....::.:: ......................................................... ..... ............... ;:::.::.: �::>:;:>:<:::>:«:::.»:>:::>:>�:�:>:<:: ;<::;::;con n tlorl rTd P Kyr Po 9�.:. : .:.:.: :.:..:.:.::. .. Swale .::..:............ ....:.:::... ..::•... , :.• ........ ::::.::.;:::.:<.;;:;:.;;:.;;•:•:• � . .. ..,. Type;sheet flow, �. .. ....:::.:. ::.�.:.:.:............. :.:.:.:....... ee:..::::a«;,, . e,; ..: <::::: erit; :°•:stream channel I dralna a basln�Ve etatlon:cover::::;::: :;.,:;96:;::,. .,.114•ti11�,;1320 R; ;:.overtopping,(Iooding,habKat or organism tributary area;lili011fioticl of probl see map � �P Pei: A : .. . �: g ..; .. . �. • :.'':?: :: `pond;Size'diameter, depth;type of sensative area;volume destruction scouring,bank sloughing; overflow pathways;potential Impacts. : ::::.::::::::.::::::. a lotto Inclslori'other erosion:: :...:.::.:::.: :.. .::..:.::..:. : :.: ..::::'.':sad , .. . _ ; ::: ;;:.::_: : surface area.; :..• ::: .•:: :.:::::::::.;:;.:;>.:;::::;::;;:;: •.' :>:':;.;;;:;: ..:.. .:. __ � `� AO D l! 7-? -2 it, VEq•� e-77.",, -f�iTGh` . _,S� , OV�2rc / S19,4 �O�T�r f 7h'�`2 /2�. 7 ( A ?'—iS.1,-!.5: r� fJ/TCir/ — ov 'T 54iA1 S.444r 7)2A//07L`^/ ox /�iTc ?-Sf /e7xIsr/wj' ,42/1,9/,t49f,— L1Tabla.doc 11 2I92 KING COUNTY, NV ) iUNGTON, SURFACE WA ;R DESIGN MANUAL 1.2 CORE REQUIREMENTS The seven Core Requirements are: oft (1) Discharge at the Natural Location. The discharge from a proposed project site must occur at the natural location. of (2) Off-Site Analysis. All proposed projects must identify the upstream tributary drainage area and perform a downstream analysis.. Levels of analysis required depend on the problems identified or predicted. At a minimum, a Level 1 analysis must be submitted with the initial permit application. � (3) Runoff Control. Proposed projects must provide runoff controls to limit the developed conditions peak rates of runoff to the pre-development peak rates for specific design storm events based on the runoff from defined existino site conditions, and install biofiltration measures. G' 5AZ)0 Q' 141J /m/' e v/c 5 X'iHreze__ oX- (4) Conveyance System. All conveyance systems for proposed projects must be analyzed, designed and constructed for existing tributary off-site runoff and developed on-site runoff from the proposed project. — c'rt L (5) Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control. All projects that require engineered drainage plans shall provide Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) measures that minimize imize the transport of re(J Vime }J nt to ...rainag,e facilities, water res"urces, an adjacent properties. e),V ,i(6) Maintenance and Operation. Maintenance of all drainage facilities constructed or modified by a proposed project is the responsibility of the property owner (see Maintenance Requirements for Privately Maintained Drainage Facilities in Appendix A), except King County may assume maintenance of drainage facilities constructed for formal Plat Subdivisions, planned unit developments, and some Short Plat Subdivisions two years after construction approval. (7) Bonds and Liability. Alt drainage facilities for proposed projects (except drainage stub-out connections, downspout roof drain infiltration systems and downspout dispersion systems for single-family residential lots) must be constructed in conformance with the bond and liability requirements of King County Code 9.04.100. • %4;� 1.2-1 11/94 KING COUNTY, WA "- INGTON, SURFACE WATT"" DESIGN MANUAL 1.3 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS �• In addition to the seven Core Requirements, twelve Special Requirements may apply to a proposed project. Each set of requirements below is preceded by the conditions in which the requirements apply its"threshold." Most thresholds can be assessed and the special requirements determined in advance of formal engineering plan preparation. Other thresholds may require a special study before a determirkation can be made as to the application of a Special Requirement to a proposed project. The twelve Special Requirements are: (1) Critical Drainage Areas 'one (2) Compliance with an Existing Master Drainage Plan r N7fI (3) Conditions requiring a Master Drainage Plan r /-to _ -f rz (4) Adopted Basin or Community Plans ,-,Vd '4/ ,ee47.74D (5) Special Water Quality Controls Hon e-- (6) Coalescing plate oil/water separators PA (7) Closed Depressions ,N/,A (8) Use of Lakes, Wetlands or Closed Depressions for Runoff Control q/� (9) Delineation of the 100 year Floodplain. Ale/ (10) Flood Protection Facilities for Type 1 and Type 2 Streams ,- i///4 (11) Geotechnical Analysis and Report ^ N� (12) Soils Analysis and Report 1.3-1 1/90 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 03/18/97 15 :30 Receipt ***'************************************************************* Receipt Number: R9701653 Amount : 1, 506 . 08 03/18/97 15 :29 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #012542 MCCLINCY Init : LN Project # : LUA97-035 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 102305-9140 Site Address: 4604 NE 4TH ST Total Fees : 1, 506 . 08 This Payment 1, 506 . 08 Total ALL Pmts: 1, 506 . 08 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 .81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 6 . 08