HomeMy WebLinkAboutEx.04_D_HEX_Decision_Canopy_PrePudPlat_201120EXHIBIT 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
October 1, 2020
Mr. Phil Olbrechts
Hearing Examiner
City of Renton
1055 S Grady Way
Renton, WA
SUBJECT: Request for Reconsideration
File LUA19-000223, PUD, PP, VA-H; Canopy PUD/Preliminary Plat
4196 Lincoln Ave NE, Renton, WA 98033
Dear Mr. Examiner:
As the City’s Project Manager for the Canopy Planned Urban Development (PUD) and Preliminary Plat land use
application, please accept the following request for reconsideration to the September 18, 2020 decision. The
reconsideration request is limited to Condition #3 which states, in part, “The applicant shall submit a revised site
plan with home floor plans and exterior elevations with the civil construction permit application that
incorporates 12-foot front yard setbacks (emphasis added) for alley loaded Lots 48-55.” The City respectively
requests the condition be reconsidered to apply the staff recommended front yard setback of 15-feet thereby
removing the 12-foot front yard setback from the PUD modification table on page 7 of the Hearing Examiner’s
Decision.
Renton Municipal Code (RMC) 4-2-110A ‘Development Standards for Residential Zoning Designation (Primary
Structures)’ requires 15-foot front yard setbacks for alley loaded Residential-8 (R-8) zoned lots. Additionally, the
development standards limit primary structure height to a 24-foot wall plate and two (2) stories. As shown on
Exhibit 3 Site Plan, Exhibit 23 Architectural Streetscape Plan, Exhibit 24 Color Architectural Elevations, Exhibit 33
Floor Plans, the proposed homes are setback less than 15-feet (except Lot 53) and the homes exceed the height
limitations of the zone.
The PUD regulations allow the City to modify noted development regulations set forth in RMC 4-9-150D in
exchange for public benefit(s) and superior design outcomes that would not occur without a Planned Urban
Development, however the City is not obligated to approve every applicant modification request, but instead
staff considers the impact of the modifications related to abutting and adjacent properties, whether the
modifications are aligned and consistent with similar types of development in similar zoning districts, and if the
combined impact of the changes to the regulations would result in a project of superior design. The applicant’s
front yard setback reduction coupled with the increased height of the homes is not consistent with the scale of
single-family residential development within the City’s R-8 zoning district nor does the combined modification
request result in a superior design outcome.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
Mr. Phil Olbrechts
Page 2 of 3
October 1, 2020
The setback reduction and height of the structures is not consistent with other R-8 zoned neighborhoods in the
City. The scale and setback is also not consistent with the other homes and lots within the Canopy subdivision
itself. As shown on Exhibits 3 and 23, all of the homes along Road A are setback at least 15-feet, except Lot 48-
55, which were recommended to be conditioned to meet the 15-foot setback. Review of the PUD by City staff is
not simply an evaluation of each modification absent the remainder of the project. Each modification requested
is reviewed holistically to determine what creates a superior project design. In this case, staff’s recommended
condition of approval to require a 15-foot setback for all lots from Road A is intended to ensure the outcome of
the project as a whole meets the intent of the PUD regulations, results in a consistent neighborhood design, and
is within the scale intended by the R-8 zone.
Homes across Road A are limited visually to single story. Staff is supportive of the increased heights for Lots 48-
55 however this is in conjunction with an R-8 compliant front yard setback. Staff finds the impacts of a three
story home less than 15-feet from the sidewalk along a residential access street exceed what is typical within the
City and does not result in a superior design then what could be developed under the standards of the R-8 zone.
If the Hearing Examiner rules in favor of retaining the 12-foot front yard setback, the City requests a condition
that the homes on Lot 48-55 comply with the R-8 height limitations of 24-foot wall plate and two (2) stories to
better align with the scale of single-family residential development within the City’s R-8 zoning district.
It should also be noted the footprint of the proposed home
on Lot 53 meets the 15-foot front yard setback, as shown
on Exhibit 3. During the hearing, the applicant disputed this
statement by staff however as shown to the left, the
footprint clearly meets the front yard setback requirement.
If this is not the case as presented by the applicant during
testimony, then the site plan that was reviewed by staff is
not an accurate representation of what the applicant
proposes to build. As stated by staff during the hearing, if
Lot 53 is able to meet the front yard setback requirements
of the R-8 zone, then the remaining lots within this block
should be able to meet the front yard setback requirement.
The applicant would need to revise floor plans and model
of the homes to meet the setback, but this is what should
occur during a preliminary plat application. The layout of
the lots and streets are designed first and the homes are
designed second to fit the constraints of the lot. The
applicant has reversed this norm by designing the future
home first regardless of the constraints of the lot resulting
in the need for modifications.
When evaluating a PUD and the associated modifications to the City’s regulations, staff balances the relaxation
of development standards against the public benefit of the design. All parts work together to inform the design
and recommendation of the project. One piece should not be removed or modified as it will change the balance
that has been developed to create a project that is superior in design and provides a balanced public benefit.
Therefore, staff requests that the Hearing Examiner look at the staff recommendation as a holistic evaluation of
the project and not remove one part of the whole, as done with the revised Condition of Approval #3.
Scaled 15' measurement from Exhibit 3 Site Plan
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
Mr. Phil Olbrechts
Page 3 of 3
October 1, 2020
In closing, City staff requests reconsideration of Condition #3 for revised plans that provide the required R-8
zone 15-foot front yard setback for Lots 48-55 as indicated in the September 1, 2020 Staff Report to the Hearing
Examiner. The setback provides consistency and continuity with other proposed homes in the subdivision and
the R-8 zoning district as a whole. The front yard setbacks at 15-feet are one part of the whole project and
should not be removed.
Sincerely,
Matt Herrera, AICP
Senior Planner
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
October 13, 2020
Mr. Phil Olbrechts
Hearing Examiner
City of Renton
1055 S Grady Way
Renton, WA
SUBJECT: Reply to Reconsideration
File LUA19-000223, PUD, PP, VA-H; Canopy PUD/Preliminary Plat
4196 Lincoln Ave NE, Renton, WA 98033
Dear Mr. Examiner:
Please accept this reply to the Canopy applicant response related to the City’s October 1, 2020 reconsideration
of the Planned Urban Development (PUD) and Preliminary Plat land use decision. As provided in the applicant’s
response, the City and applicant have come to an agreement on a compromise for setbacks on Lots 48-55. The
City respectively requests the Hearing Examiner revise Condition #3 (pg. 46) to read:
“The applicant shall submit a revised site plan with home floor plans and exterior elevations with the
civil construction permit application that incorporates 12-foot front yard setbacks for alley loaded Lots
49, 51, and 52 and 15-foot front yard setbacks for alley loaded Lots 48, 50, 53, 54, and 55. A reduction
in rear yard setbacks and/or other modification to assist in meeting this condition may also be
considered by the Current Planning Project Manager. The revised plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to permit issuance.”
Additionally, the City requests a revised Findings of Fact #3 in the PUD Modification Chart for RMC 4-2-110A (pg.
7) related to minimum front yard setbacks to read, in part:
“Lots 49, 51, and 52: 12-feet”
Sincerely,
Matt Herrera, AICP
Senior Planner
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
PRELIMINARY PLAT, PUD, VAR - 1
BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF RENTON
RE: Canopy PUD and Preliminary Plat
Preliminary Plat, Preliminary Planned Unit
Development and Critical Areas Variances
LUA19-000223, PUD, PP, VA-H
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF
LAW AND DECISION UPON
RECONSIDERATION
Whereas, on October 1, 2020 the City of Renton requested reconsideration of the Final Decision
issued for the above-captioned matter on September 18, 2020; and
Whereas, the reconsideration request was limited to Condition 3; and
Whereas, as a result of the reconsideration request the Applicant and City have come to
agreement on revisions to Condition No. 3 along with a revision to Finding of Fact No. 3 to the Final
Decision; and
Whereas, the agreed upon revisions are found to be consistent with City development standards,
Now, Therefore,
Pursuant to agreement of the parties, Condition No. 3 of the Final Decision is replaced with the
following:
The applicant shall submit a revised site plan with home floor plans and exterior
elevations with the civil construction permit application that incorporates 12-foot
front yard setbacks for alley loaded Lots 49, 51, and 52 and 15-foot front yard setbacks
for alley loaded Lots 48, 50, 53, 54, and 55. A reduction in rear yard setbacks and/or
other modification to assist in meeting this condition may also be considered by the
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
PRELIMINARY PLAT, PUD, VAR - 2
Current Planning Project Manager. The revised plans shall be reviewed and approved
by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to permit issuance
Pursuant to agreement of the parties, the PUD Modification Chart for RMC 4-2-110A related
to minimum front yard setbacks is revised to read, in part to remove the language authorizing a 12 foot
setback for Lots 48-55 and replacing it with the following:
Lots 49, 51, and 52: 12-feet
All remaining portions of the Final Decision are to remain unmodified.
DATED this 2nd day of November 2020.
City of Renton Hearing Examiner
Appeal Right and Valuation Notices
RMC 4-8-080(G) classifies the application(s) subject to this decision as Type III applications
subject to closed record appeal to the City of Renton City Council. Appeals of the hearing
examiner’s decision must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the decision.
A request for reconsideration to the hearing examiner may also be filed within this 14 -day appeal
period.
Affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes
notwithstanding any program of revaluation.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0028C16D-8801-4F41-A71B-78B5181E27C9