Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-06-017_Report 10 .
~ z
" 0
0
0 z s
'
SHEET
NO.
1
·---
2
----
'
-
' -g
to . 15
16 . 21 --
22 · 38
---
PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation
I N DE X
PLAN
REFERENCE TI TLE
NO.
11 INDEX
Vt VICINI TY MAP / P~oject Location
Tl VICINITY MAP / Existing Conditions
SP 1 . 6 SITE PREP SHEETS (61
GR l . 6 GRADING SHEETS !61
P I -6 PLANTING SHEETS (61
D I -l 7 OETAI L SHEETS (171
-------
-----·----
SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN:
REFERENCE#:
200500415 IN, Streams and Wetlands
APPLICANT, WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTALDATUM: PROJECT COUNTY: King STATE, WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO ea
Key Map and Vicinity Map DATE: 01/20/06 SHEET 11 OF 38
I/
~·
I .. ~·
. · .. ·· .. I --------~·
w
g·
2',_VICIN iYMAP
'~ @I
~
\
\, ___
-\
\
I
I
(
1 I 1
PROJEC; LOCATION _J
,,------1.' B A I
C
.. I
I
I
I
I
-1.
i
®
\ .· •.
\
KEY_MAP
NTS '
i
PROJECT
LOCATION
z
0
0 u
0 z "e-....l.:s___jl.J __ .__ ___ l_ __ ~ __ l_l_ __________ .]_ _____ ~---------1
l PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN:
t° REFERENCE #: ~ 200500415 IN: Stceams and Wetlands
:S NEAR/AT: Renton APPLICANT: WSDOT HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT ~ COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 88
~ Key Map and Vicinity Map DATE: 01/20/06 SHEET V1 OF 38 L._ _____________ _J__;__:._ __ .__.____J_ ____________ _,__==--'-'--"'--'"'----'
LONG: -122°14'10"
LAT: 47°27'29"
SUBJECT SI TE:
SPRINGBROOK UNIT
LONG: -122°14'24"
LAT: 47°27'19"
ST
0
0:::
LONG: -122°13'26"
LAT: 47°27'28" >-
W
_J
_J
<C
>
Lu
SUBJECT SITE:
SPRINGBROOK UNIT A
SUBJECT SITE:
SPRINGBROOK UNIT C ~ f,=======S~W'ft.: f;;: -.:3::..:il.'....!T_.:::H:...._l-+--:::._S__'._T ___ _J
0 6 "-
~
LONG: -122°14'08"
LAT: 47°26'49"
LONG: -122°14'27"
LAT: 47°26'29"
V)
'.:L
<C
0
v,
SW 41ST
(S 180TH
i w +, VICINITY MAP
0 z ,-~
_J
ST
* THE 100 IS ONLY
ST)
cJ?-----
Legend
/fTI ff'/ Exlsti ng
C '-'ii Wetlands
Flood
plain I ' = '1--~--------------~-"''------'----'------~---------------'---L-~--L..--------I ~ PURPOSE: \1\/etland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK
REFERENCE#:
PROPOSED/RETAIN:
200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands
APPLICANT: WSOOT NEARJAT: Renton HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT ~ COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVD88
l~----------------~-K-•y_M_•_P_•_nd_v_rc_rn_rty_M_•_P~_o_A_T_E_:_0_1_12_0_,0_6 _________ ~---'--S~H_E_E_T_T_1~0_F_3_8_~
I .•
i Nj~
fu ~ r--
' ~ 1-
§ w ~-• w . ~ J: ~-. < ti)~-~ f·' ~ w~
.ll z. '-... ~ ...J !-·
• J:,"
' (J, -' I-. ~ <( i --
} :E
!
I
~
I
" ,
" "
8
i
" ~
OHWM ...
ALL WORK WILL BE WITHIN THE HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE
SW 27ff ST
l-·~ .. ·-_:-~,:;_ ~;;_2 :'.tt¥'i?r& -· -·-·u· N'. .: r··· I: . ·: . :A:
:"_ .: ----"· : / "-: -<· -'
f sn s t
<
H
'
) ~
~
"r :fy :
\+ t;
+' +
+
f
¥
t I,
+
+
+
'I l
I
[;
';,jl; ~ 1H. o :1 = .J
d
l; I
I m ;; ~<~1m~1s ': ~ f }~.: ... ·: ·. · ... ·j I \ . . .. . l
I . . . !
·1 --!i , -. 1 . ,
'I
Legend
L~ :-:;,wetlands
· ~ Ditch
o Storm Inlet
@ Storm Manhole
OHWM Line
•··•--•--•·· ... Low Flow Chan.
Storm Sewer Line
Cut Line
Fill Line
Low Impact
Silt Fence
High Visibility
Fence
Property Line
~ Blackberry
Removal
~ Select Blackberry
Removal
~ Clearing and
Grubbing
[III] Reed Canary
Grass Removal
'CJ1 Construction
Entrance and
Tire Wash, See
Detail Sheet D17
Note:
Not all Map Legend
Elements are on each
Sheet
KEYMAP
,
,_
~
B
!
A
. ._!
i
_,,,; .... c, ---,:,~;:'-'. ,._, . ..,J)f.)
~ •-~ • ..... j ·--· ·sW'30THST1Row1····r.>• /IE; ~ i"'~.] ji l,K..:._ -.:_,_-, :~ ~ .. · .. iTO.Ell VACAllDI.: ·-:/ : rnld~ ... I ; ';:cs I; , ' ~ -~~---~-. --... --------~l~J~: 8 I , ·., -H
~ I -~--
~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: +N o 100 200
b REFERENCE #: w E Feet
~ 2 00500415 IN, Stceams and Wetlands
~ APPLICANT: WSDOT NCOEAURN/TYA ~: RK~nton STATE· H~RIZONTA.L DA.TUM: PROJECT ~ · Ing · WA VERTICAL DA TUM: NAVO 66 g Permit Drawings Slte A & 8 DATE: 01/20/06 SHEET SP1 OF 38
ALL WORK WILL BE WITHIN THE HIGH v:srBILITY FENCE
w
~ ";;c~---T'--m-..,.._..,..___ -
w '~7Z4,EJJi.t?a-~-= ---~-~~-~~ f r,;{'-Cc: ~-:,-,-=cc :---~----;: 1 ! 1
sl -
LJ :N·: ~r: T--·-' ~ -. .... ..,_ ~ -.. . B· j
I
I
I
--I -~ er]
-.: I
Legend
;:--: ,7'Wetlands --· ---.;;,, Ditch
o Storm Inlet
© Storm Manhole
OHWM Line
.................... Low Flow Chan.
Storm Sewer Line
Cut Line
Fill Line
Low Impact
Silt Fence
High Visibility
Fence
Property Line
~ Blackberry
Removal
~ Select Blackberry
Removal
~ Clearing and
Grubbing
[III] Reed Canary
Grass Removal
Note:
Construction
Entrance and
Tire Wash, See
Detail Sheet 017
Not all Map Legend
Elements are on each
Sheet.
KEYMAP
'
I
B A
C
C ;: r
" ~'
i
" • " <
i
~
i
l
§
' !
f
~ 0-• 0-
"-
"' z
OJ
,;
£
+
+
ALL WORK WILL BE WJTH]NI THE HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE
L
L-_,,-+++++++
+ +
" I
+. + +
+
+ +
+ +
+ +
UNIT
'+ + +
+
'+
C
Legend ;= :-;,wetlands
· · ~ Ditch
~ Stonn Inlet
@ Storm Manhole
OHVv'M Line
.................. Low Flow Chan.
Storm Sewer Line
Cut Line
Fill Line
Low Impact
Silt Fence
High Visibility
Fence
Property Line
I+ + ~ i Blackberry
Removal
[2223 Select Blackberry
Removal
~ Clearing and
Grubbing
[III) Reed Canary
Grass Removal
Note:
Construction
Entrance and
Tire Wash, See
Detail Sheet 017
Not all Map Legend
Elements are on each
Sheet
KEYMAP
' ,
B A
I
i
J ~ .!
; . t~f'
11------------.-------.----_____:_----+J7_B,Ll==t=1-==-::,,=lr
~~,: PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation
2
s
0
::Q~N
5
E;QE~
0
~
4
~~
1
: Ks PROPOSED/RETAIN: .--Ls _ ,°
IN: Streams and Wetlands ~--
NEAR/AT: Renton APPLICANT: WSDOT HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT
Q
~ COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVD88
0 ~----------------~-P_e_nn_lt_D_ra_w_in_g_s_S_IT_E_c_~D_A_T_E_:_0_1_12_0_106 __________ ~-~S~H~E~E~T~SP~3~0~F~3~8-~
'" '" ,~,
ALL WORK WlLL BE WITHIN THE HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE
UNIT C
•. •. "· .. ,..,, ~.
~
:<
"' w
:::,
z w >
<!
w
_;
<!
0
"' ,c
<!
0
Legend
L _ · · / Wetlands
----Ditch
o Storm Inlet
@ Storm Manhole
OHWM Line
• • ·--• • Low Flow Chan.
Storm Sewer Line
Cut Line
-•1u.-"" Fill Line
Low Impact
Silt Fence
High Visibility
Fence
Property Line
~ Blackberry
Removal
~ Select Blackbeny
Removal
ffi2 Clearing and
Grubbing
~ Reed Canary
Grass Removal
Note:
Construction
Entrance and
Tire Wash, See
Detail Sheet 017
Not all Map Legend
Elements are on each
Sheet.
KEYMAP
h--=-
' • B A
i~_Jl__ _______ ~-----~--------_j=f=Br======:'::j ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: +" a'•••100c==5'oo
b
0
·-REFERENCE#: w e Feei
~ 2 00500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands ,
APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTALDATUM: PROJECT ~ COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO ss
5 Pennit Drawings SITE C DATE: 01/20/06 SHEET SP4 OF 38 -~----------------~---------~--------------~--==~-=~~-~
Legend
L: --:;,-wetlands
· · ~ Ditch
o Storm Inlet
@ Storm Manhole
OHWM Line
... -.............. Low Flow Chan.
SW 40TH ST Storm Sewer Line
Cut Line
8
< • <
~'
§
& • • " < ,
' ' • l
~
1
I
f • •
• s
0
f-
1---l
z
=i
ALL WORK WILL BE WITHIN
THE H[GH VISIBILITY FENCE
EXISTING WETLAND
1¥t[TJGAT10N SITE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I r \ ~ l I:
~\ ,. l ,f,
\,/' ·-~ \ J '-~~) ,-', I;: J p
i I
1·,
!
I
' I
* i ! /
°g. EXISTING STORM \ ~ <::.,*°
Fill Line
Low Impact
Silt Fence
High Visibility
Fence
Property Line
~ Blackberry
Removal
~ Select Blackberry
Removal
~ Clearing and
Grubbing
[IIu Reed Canary
Grass Removal
Note:
Construction
Entrance and
Tire Wash, See
Detai I Sheet D 17
Construction
Entrance and
Tire Wash, See
Note 1 Detail
Sheet D17
Not all Map Legend
Elements are on each
Sheet
KEYMAP
' ' B A
.; WATER PONO I I r:,_;~4;, ; '",, ·~! _ _,;1-'~,'"'L"'"°_"'_",c: __ ,"'_~ I I , _'81 _J_i ~ ~-------------===-===:;::==±==-==-==---=c;=======;t;,~2!1..~413_!:R:_!:D~S;_:Tr_tLW=:'.".'.L========·--::!-·=:j
I
I
~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: w+' ,'
Q
o REFERENCE#:
0 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands ,
:-::: APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT
~ COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVD86
S L_ ________________ _j__P_e_rm_it_D_r_a_w_in_:gc_s_S_IT_E_D__Jc_DA_TE_:_01_12_0_10_6 _________ ___J_ _ _:Se,HecEe,E=.Tc_::S.:_Pc_5_,0,,F--"38e__ _ _J
"'
; •
~
~·
ALL WORK WILL BE WITHIN THE HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE
LJ NIT E
OHWM
SW 39TH ST.
Legend
[_~ :::-;;,wetlands
· · · ___,. Ditch
o Stam, Inlet
<> Stam, Manhole
OHWM Line
•··•·· ···• Low Flow Chan.
Storm Sewer Line
Cut Line
Fill Line
Low Impact
Silt Fence
High Visibility
Fence
Property Line
E::;::::+J Blackberry
Removal
~ Select Blackberry
Removal
~ Clearing and
Grubbing
LL<1J Reed Canary
Grass Removal
Construction
Entrance and
Ti re Wash, See
Detail Sheet D 17
Note:
Not all Map Legend
Elements are on each
Sheet.
KEYMAP I
,
B A
§ r--~--~---~
i r SW 40TH ST ~.P--+-__ __c_J ..
~
0
:1-P-U_R_P_O~S-E-, -We-t-la_n_d_M_lt-iga-ti-.o-n------,--S-P_R_I_N_G_B_R_O_O_K __ ,-PR_O_P_O_S_E_D_IR_E_T_A_IN-,------~+w+-c,'c--.,;;;:;;,~00;;;;;;20-lo
REFERENCE#: Feet
0 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands ~ APPLICANT·. WSOOT NEAR/AT: Renton s HORIZONTA,L DA,TUM: PROJECT
~o COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 88
"~---------------~-P_e_nn_l_t_Dra_w_ln_g_s_S_IT_E_E_~D_A_T_E_:_01_12_0_1o_B ________ ~~-S~H~E~E~T_S~P~6~0~F~38~-~
~ g
a a
0
a z
----
:---.
SEE SHEET Dl FOR
TYPICAL BREACH
SECTION !UNITS A & Bl
SW 27TH ST
8' W[[)f ELEVATED
•BOAR~WALK : SEE
-SHEET 02 FOR
'"TYPICAL SECTION)
> .,:
Legend
£ ~ J Wetlands
.. ~ Ditch
o Storm Inlet
© Storm Manhole
OHWM Line
Property Line
•·• •-•-• Low Flow Chan.
Storm Sewer Line
Cut Line
Fill Line ... 1.-Proposed Contou
~ . ...-,
-s,-sr Proposed Storm
Line
Note:
Not all Map Legend
Elements are on each
Sheet.
KEYMAP
•
/-'-
. .
' I
S'
~rP-U~R~P-O_S_E_:_W-etl_a_n_d_M-it-ig-ati_o_n------~--S-P_R_I_N_G_B_R_O_O_K_~_P_R_O_P_O_S_E_D_I_R_E_TA-IN-,----~---+-+-,~-,-~-,-00---,00----<
~ REFERENCE#: w Elll .... ,.~c,====:::5
~ 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands ,
---, ----· -~-.
:s:: NEARJAT: Renton ~ APPLICANT: WSDOT COUNTY: King STATE: WA ~~~~~Lo~:~: N::J:acT
& ~----------------~P_•_nn_1t_o_,._w_1_n_gs_s_ite_A_&_e~_D_A_T_E_:_0_1_12_0_10_6 _________ ~-~S~H~E~E~T~G_R_1 ~O~F_38 __ ~
:1 ' (J
'""' ,. _/ / -t:c-
--.. ·/•. ,~. [ :_EXlSl!NQ --..
, c •. ·( ,__WETLAND. _ 'I -. -.. ---MHIGATION.· --·-. : --S [·TE •· I J .-• .... -
~/ ( ~
·1 .(.· .• ; -~··.·. ~.· -"\'(-"' I ·.· ·-· .. -
I .. \
····\ .
-1
.,
.... a::
C)
1-w w ::c
U)
w z ::::;
::c
-(J
I-
<(
::!!
--I l: ----
Legend
L~ J Wetlands
---~
0
@
ST-ST
Note:
Ditch
Storm Inlet
Storm Manhole
OHV\/M Line
Property Line
Low Flow Chan.
Stam, Sewer Line
Cut Line
Fill Line
Proposed Contou
Proposed Storm
Line
Not all Map Legend
Elements are on each
Sheet
KEYMAP
2 ,
B A
~ L i-~-----~---,;:------. _._. -----·· Is
i~-----~---~----_l__--1:=L:=t==±:===~ f PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSEDIRETAIN: +' il'•••"'c::o==='oo
0~ REFERENCE#: w E Feet , 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands ,
s: NEAR/AT: Renton APPLJCANT: WSDOT HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT g COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVD88
"'------------------'----P_e_nn_it_D_ra_w_i_n_g_,_s_1T_E_B _ _,___D_A_T_E_:_0_1_12_0_10_6 _________ ~-~S~H~E~E~T~G=R2~0~F~3~8-~
UN IT C
Legend
/ / Wetlands
· · · ~ Ditch
o Storm Inlet
@ Storm Manhole
OHWM Line
Property Line
.................. Low Flow Chan.
1 ! Storm Sewer Line
Cut Line
Fill Line I: !
\i ;
I
-1-Proposed Contour
'--:•--'
s,-sr Proposed Stenn
Line
Note:
Not all Map Legend
Elements are on each
Sheet.
KEYMAP
I ,
f . 4
I
! ~ ~[~,_l"
~ ' . ., .·
zl ----------------r----------,----------_J----+·=~======· ===-1 "I-~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation S:=~~;E~~~~K PROPOSED/RETAIN: w+' .°•••:t:'::, ==5'°'
§ 200500415 IN: Stceams and Wetlands ,
:::: APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT
~ COUNTY: King ST ATE: WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 88
~~---------------~-P_e_m1_1_,_0ra_w_in_g_,_s_1T_E_c_~o_A_T_E:_01_12_0_10_6 ________ ~ __ S~H~E~E~T_G_R_3_0~F~3_8_~
~
g
6 u
0
UNIT C
Legend
/._~ _J Wetlands
··-~
0
@
..................
ST-ST
Note:
Ditch
Storm Inlet
Storm Manhole
OHWM Line
Property Line
Low Flow Chan .
Stom, Sewer Line
Cut Line
Fill Line
Proposed Contour
Proposed Storm
Line
Not all Map Legend
Elements are on each
Sheet.
KEYMAP
'
z ~-::.:_...; __ ,
"f--~-------------.-----------,r----~---------t----:,-----------i ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSEDIRETAIN: +' 'illl•llll'°c'==:5''°
f5 REFERENCE#: w E F~t
0 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands ~ NEAR/AT, Reatoa ' APPLICANT: WSDOT HORIZOITTAL DATIJM: PROJECT
8 COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO ss l Penn It Drawings SITE C DATE: 01/20/06 SHEET GR4 OF 38 ~--------------~-------~~------------~-~=~-~--~
NOTE: WATER FLOWS NORTH TO
UNIT "c" VIA EXISTING DITCH
3'
0
"'
"' "'
Cc
"' z
OJ
0
f-
1-----i
z
~
EXISTING WETLAND
M]T]GATION SITE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l,
SW 40TH ST
7:.,
SEE SHEET D8
FOR DETAIL
. <
\ :.
L :
< /·
X SEE SHEET 09 { \ FOR DRAINAGE
C \ ! PROFILE
I I
., ' I l
I I
\.j'-...._~
f
.)
II I "'.I .) SEE SHEET 07 _,,, ·;:I FOR DETAIL 7
EXISTING STORM~ . I "'"""+
Legend
/~ ./ Wetlands ~-
···~
D
@
... _.,,_ ........ ..
Ditch
Storm Inlet
Storm Manhole
OHWM Line
Property Line
Low Flow Chan .
Storm Sewer Line
Cut Line
Fill Line
Proposed Contour
s,-sr Proposed Storm
Line
Note:
Not all Map Legend
Elements are on each
Sheet
KEYMAP
I
WATER PONO [ ~'~ I c,+ (.;
I , l ~
~ ===·'' ,1 ---<+/1----/-----_j
I
' I --, /: I
i~,z.· i ""' ·s
• L----------======_:::jt:_==-========b~..:'S!W_4'.:,;3~R'..':Dl__:'S_:.TJ::::r..======:::I
I PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: +" •' •••'°c'==::5'""
0
~ REFERENCE #; w E Feet " 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands ,
:<.: NEAR/AT: Renton APPLICANT: WSDOT HORIZONTALDATIJM: PROJECT
,~o COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVD88
~, Penn it Drawings SITED DATE: 01/20/06 SHEET GR5 OF 38 ~----------------~---------~--------------~--==~=~~~-~
~ . •
~I
i :, • • < ,
" ' i
' e
~
f
,i'
f
' "
~
/l
' :
E
SEE SHEET 011 FOR TYPICAL
LCW FLOW SECTION (UNIT El
(/---~~~~~~
Legend
l · 7 Wetlands
• ------:9-Ditch
o Storm Inlet
@ Storm Manhole
·------OHWM Line
----Property Line
Low Flow Chan.
Storm Sewer Line
_,.,~"' Cut Line
. .,._,,., Fill Line
-,--Proposed Contou '--1,--'
-sr~s1 Proposed Stenn
Line
Note:
Not all Map Legend
Elements are on each
Sheet.
KEYMAP
~ SW 39TH ST.
~ '/ _.,. ----------------1 < B i-i iv: 1::w?Y '§.~;;:........ SEE SHEET D12 FOR TYPICAL
1
····~ .• E··· . • .. __ .-,'I ;,/ /. BREACH SECT10NS (UN[T El ~ ,_.,,., ,/
: ,;" ~--·--------~~--~--------~~-~-~~--[BJ j "~ i
SL_ll ----------,-~:-:=:=-==-~S;W~4~0~TH~S~T~;:-----_tf=f~='~=-~·~~cc.J~·-~ +' ,, .... 1111,oo=:==:::5200 ' SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation Feet
F REFERENCE#: IN: Streams and Wetlands
§ 200500415 NEAR/AT: Reoton H~R<ZONTALO,TUM, eaoJECT
=,:; APPLICANT: WSDOT COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 88 'L _______________ _j_'P'.'."".'""~ii:_t~D'.:ra""w"'in~g~s_:;s~rT'.:E~E:_l.':D".:A~T.':.E.:_· ::_01.".,2:'.o'.'.:,oo'.'.'._ ________ _1_ __ S,eHe,Es,E°'T-'G"'R"'6'-0"'-F~3B~-~ ~
LJ N I T B UNIT 1/r-
____ 1 __ SW 27TH ST J-
I -
A
~ -.
I
0 z
_;
Legend
L_--, J Wetlands
· · ~ Ditch ---0
@
Stream
Storm Inlet
Storm Manhole
OHWM Line
................. Low Flow Chan.
0
Storm Sewer Line
Vertical Snags
See D16
Logs
See D13
Hummock Planting
See D15
Brush Pile
See D14
fij1I1
111
9 Wetland Tree/
-Shrub#1
~ Wetland Tree/
Shrub #2
~ Wetland Tree/
-Shrub #3
BI3E Wetland F crest
Unde(J)lanting
EH:3 Upland Hab~at
Plantings
~ Riparian
Plantings
~ Emergent
Plantings
Note:
Not all Map Legend
Elements are on each
Sheet
KEYMAP
' ' B A
SW 30TH ST <ROW! .• .·1.,1· · g ( IO BE VACATEDl ..
~: ~c,', --' i
~ J.!a."'!;0-..==J ______ ~
"f-~--~------------~---------~-----------~---+-~----------1 ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: +" '
6
0
-REFERENCE#: w E
200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands r NEAR/AT1 Renton ' APPLICANT: WSDOT HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT ~ COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 66
"" ,oo
Ji ~----------------~P_e_nn_11_0_,._w1_n_gs_S_ite_A_&_B~_D_A_T_E_1_0_1_12_0_100 __________ ~-~S~H~E~E~T~P~1~D~F-~3~8-~
:<
"'
w
::,
z w
> SW 27TH ST
:~11111
~ f:' ----. ---.. _,:.:~-~--_..::. :----~--~
"' <!
0
' . I
··~ ··~
:: :: I
Legend
[ ·· J Wetlands
· · · -Ditch
~ ----Stream
0
@
Storm Inlet
Storm Manhole
OHWM Line
•··-· .... Low Flow Chan.
0
Storm Sewer Line
Vertical Snags
See D16
,/" Logs
See D13
Hummock Planting
See D15 0
"f Brush Pile
See D14
ffr I 111 d Wetland Tree/
· Shrub #1
~ Wetland Tree/
Shrub #2
~ Wetland Tree/
Shrub #3
~ Wetland Forest
Underplanting
ffiE Upland Habitat
Plantings
~ Riparian
Plantings
~ Emergent
Plantings
Note:
Not all Map Legend
Elements are on each
Sheet.
KEYMAP
' ' B A
-u >,-'
' "
, • -"'
~
"' z
aJ
1/,.,.
~y
JI i r
_!.)'cl"':!'
·-J Tl r··1
'1111
Clr,l_U-
y1y1 l
I '(1 1'y-
' ,-'I a YJ
y
'lYIYJ
"':y. I y I.,
'I 1 'I :1
,.:" :;_ i
'
·-~
I
'
'
I
' I ,_
I '
-,
'
I
I
" '
I
"
I
l ' L
-,--' 'tl
--1 ' I =-
>< ' -
,"I--)
T, ':l -
I I
I
1 I
, t r • I r11 1
I I H l -~
T T T ' I
I I I 'f I
n'I T r'IT
I I I
X T ' 'y,
I I
I
Legend
;= / Wetlands
--c> Ditch
Stream
Storm Inlet
Storm Manhole
OHWM Line
• ------· • Low Flow Chan,
Storm Sewer Line
Vertical Snags
See 016
0
~ Logs
See 013
0 Hummock Planting
See 015 + Brush Pile
See 014
fiji I 11 11 9 Wetland Tree/
-Shrub #1
~ Wetland Tree/
Shrub #2
~ Wetland Tree/
Shrub #3
!51::3t1 Wetland Forest
Underplanting
ffiE Upland Habitat
Plantings
~ Riparian
Plantings
~ Emergent
Plantings
Note:
Not all Map Legend
Elements are on each
Sheet
KEYMAP
~ _, -· u,,.,
' I ralld y--'-+-
"-"----------------------------------~---+--"---'-----=
~0 __ : PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation $:~!:~E~~~~K PROPOSED/RETAIN: w---l_E 1o --·::c=::::j'oo
200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands T ~ NEAR/AT: Renton ' APPLICANT: WSDQT HORIZONTAL DATIJM: PROJECT
~o COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVDBB
•L_ ______________ _i___P_erm_it_Dra_w_in_,g:_s_S_IT_E_C_L_DA_T_E_:_0_11_20_106 ________ _J _ _,Se,:H,sEcSE-'-T-'P-'3'-"0,::,F_:3c,8c___,
~
~
$
UNIT C
.
I
I
I,
J,
Legend
/~ 7wet1ands -~
· · · ---,. Ditch
Stream
Storm Inlet
Storm Manhole
OHWM Line
•··· ··•·• Low Flow Chan.
0
Storm Sewer Line
Vertical Snags
See 016
~ Logs
See 013
Hummock Planting
See 015
Brush Pile
See 014
fu' 11 11 ,q Wetland Tree/
-Shrub #1
~ Wetland Tree/
Shrub #2
~ Wetland Tree/
Shrub #3
1St:511 Wetland Forest
Underplanting
8333 Upland Habitat
Plantings
Note:
Riparian
Plantings
Emergent
Plantings
Not all Map Legend
Elements are on each
Sheet.
KEYMAP
' B
'
A
0 u
0
~f--~------------~-------~~---_J_ ________ +_L__-_·L_' __ · =-=-=-=· =;=i
~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSEOfRETAIN: +' 0 ,oo ,oo
b
0
-REFERENCE #: w E
~ 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands ,
APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTALDATUM: PROJECT
~ COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAV066
~~--------------~-P_e_nm_it_D_ra_w_i_ng_s_s_1T_E_c_,_oA_T_E_:_0_112_0_1o_s ________ _L_ _ _cSccH,cEc,,Ec.T_cPc_4c...=Occ_F_3:::8:____J
ls' r
~'
i
" " • < , • ~
% r e
§
I
§ r
~
"
§
g
" 0
0
I-
1-----i
z:
=:i
EXJSTJNG WETLAND
MITIGATION SITE
EXISTING STORM
WATER POND
SW 40TH ST
3
0 cc
cc cc
"-
V, z en
I
I
I·
L
Legend
L--=-/ Wetlands
0
0
+
Ditch
Stream
Storm Inlet
Stenn Manhole
OHWM Line
Low Flow Chan.
Storm Sewer Line
Vertical Snags
See D16
Anchor Logs
See D13
Hummock Planting
See D15
Brush Pile
See D14
fuW
1 1
,y Wetland Tree/
Shrub #1
~ Wetland Tree/
Shrub #2
~ Wetland Tree/
-Shrub #3
~ Wetland Forest
Underplanting
BlI] Upland Habitat
Plantings
Note:
Riparian
Plantings
Emergent
Plantings
Not all Map Legend
Elements are on each
Sheet.
KEYMAP
' • B
u
0 z
e ~-----------=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=--=.;:==::±===----=='-=;======~~_.1SJ!W~423.f!R!:!D_.1S.!_T__j::'.:'t'.:=========' ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK
·s
"
O
f:;" REFERENCE#:
~ 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands
> NEAR/AT: Renton ~ APPLICANT: WSDOT STATE·. '"'A HORIZONTALDATUM: PROJECT ~ COUNTY: King n, VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD BS
PROPOSED/RETAIN: ,oo ·+,° 200
,~,
s
~~----------------~-P_enn_it_D_r_a_w_in_g_s_S_IT_E_D_~D_A_T_E_: _0_112_0_1_06 _________ ~--=-S~H=-EE=-T'--'P'-'5'-'0"F---'3"'8 _ ___,
LJ N I T E
Legend
/. :· 7 Wetlands
· · · ..... Ditch
~---Stream
n Storm Inlet
@ Storm Manhole
OHWM Line
• •·• • • Low Flow Chan.
··-----Storm Sewer Line
0 Vertical Snags
See D16
~ Anchor Logs
See D13
0 Hummock Planting
See D15
c!f Brush Pile
See D14
fl I ,
1 11
y Wetland Tree/
-Shrub #1
~ Wetland Tree/
Shrub #2
~ Wetland Tree/
Shrub #3
EE5l:l Wetland Forest
Underplanting
EB33 Upland Habitat
Plantings
~ Riparian
Plantings
~ Emergent
Plantings
Note:
Not all Map Legend
Elements are on each
(---,\____·~------_____j SheekEYMAP
~----SW 39TH ST. '
fr;~~(
I B A
~· .KJ .. ~ L _ _J __ ~=~:-----·~:-·===~----~ ----~~==-------=~·-=-~SW:__:4_c::O~TH::_:'S~T-~~==~~-·~___!:=t'::=l:==_,,/j:=i:-.=-==-=-::::::· .,.!::jl _ ~
~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation
" 0
i
SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN: ,oo
REFERENCE#: 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands
APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton
B COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVD88
200
! Permit Drawings SITE E DATE: 01/20/06 SHEET P6 OF 38 L_ ____________ _J_ ____ .:c_ __ _t__ ___________ ~~=~==~-~
&'
~I
i
" C
" < a • ~ • t
' ~ r
t
el
' •
" z
" 0 u
u ,
THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS
TO SHEET GR1.
illL _\.\! IL
illL illL
~ illL
,ILL ~
ill.L illL A
illL illL
~\]_/,, ill1L
ill.L illL
,ll/L illL
illL illL
~ ,llL
EX.
I B :r ,l'J, illL 0 I I
illL ,ILL I I
I 5:
~ ~ I :r
0
'JI I
ill.L I ~I\ .J·Sl'.3~ ill.L //·~ -I ~
' <...--',~ ./ ---
ill.L ~ .
cc; f 2---:=.
ill.L ill.L t/ .
,'/
ill.L ill.L I '
I I I,
;:.· ill.L ill.L I :r
0
ill.L ill.L I B I
// ~.~±. .,.,
ill.L
UN I TS A AND B. TYP.
WETLAND BOUNDARY~
\ /---L OHWM
I I 0 ·t'· -"\I;/
~ ',, ,,'
k ill.L
I I
0 f ill.L
:r I :E ill.L I r
L ill.L
I
A /
,i.lL __ =:_Jll
:·Ei' I" . ill.L
~'
t '~ lE I·.~.· . I ::,
I . '{'' u .l..LL
0 :r
:E
i SPRINGBROOK CREEK
I
I
. '~ ill.L
I ,
1.+/
s
GROUND"""\ ,
-~~~~~~--"'--/----.r--'__,..,_......!L-..;... __ _,,
NOTE1
BERM BREACHES ON UNITS A ANO B
DO NOT EXTEND BELOW THE OHWM.
VARIES
TYPICAL SECTION A-A
BREACH. UNITS A AND 8, TYP.
SCALEt N.T.S.
20' -0._"--..i
TYPICAL SECTION B-B
BREACH, UNITS A ANO B, TYP.
SCALE: N. T .S.
/
/
/
/
COMPOST, SEE NOTE l
ELEV 12'
FINISH GRADE
<BREACH BOTTOM!
25
F~,
"f-----------------,----------.--------------,,----------1 ! PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN:
5 REFERENCE#: ~ 200500415 IN, Srreams and Wetlands
APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTALDATUM: PROJECT ~ COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAvoss
wL_ _______________ J_ ___ D_E_T_A_IL_1 ___ L_D_A_TE_,_0_1_12_0_106 _________ ..L._..:Se,H"Ec,E,.,T_D,e.1c_:Oe,Fc_,3::,8_-J
• ,.
"
~·
0
0 u
u z
THIS DET Al L CORRESPONDS
TO SHEET GR1.
I
I
c2i _•10 DECK I SCREWS CONNECT
GEACH DECK BOARD~
2x6 PLANK DECK[NG I,
1/4 •• MAX. GAP I
BETWEEN DECK BOARDS
2x BLOCKING CTYP.l --tt---l'II-~
3' -0" MlN, CLR.
TYPICAL BENT 30
THROUGH BENT 161
SOURCE:
BRAC[NG
PRECAST
SHALLOW
FOOTJ NGS
OATUM
N.A.V.D. 88
i TRAIL
4' -0"
TYP.
TRA[L PROF[LE GRADE
T/OECK[NG I
A
/ ' / /
/ /
/ /
3' -0"
I I
4' ·O"
TYP.
16" MAX.
SPACING
BRACING
3' -0"
SPRINGBROOK CREEK
TRAIL CROSS SECTION
• CITY OF RENTON'S FUTURE CONDJTION, EX(STING CONVEYANCE ANALYSIS
FOR FLOODPLAIN MAPPING STUDY OF SPRINGBROOK CREEK, 2004.
I
...g_ 100 YR FLOOD CFEMAJ
EL. 20.6
I ..g_
I
100 YR FLOOD•
EL. l1.7
I
I TYP] CAL EDGE
OF DECKING
....5l___. 10 YR FLOOD•
-EL. 15.7
M--tt--2x PLASTIC WOOD
JOIST. TYP.
2 YR FLOOD•
EL. 1-4.5
2x PLASTIC GIRDER
'>------------------------------------------------------'
~-PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK
REFERENCE#:
PROPOSED/RETAIN:
2005004 15 IN, Stceams and Wetlands
NEAR/AT: Renton ~ APPLICANT: WSDOT COUNTY: King STATE: WA HORlZONTALDATUM: PROJECT
~ VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 68
Oi ~----------------~---D_E_T_A_I_L_2 ___ ~_DA_TE_,_01_1_20_10_6 _________ ~--S~H~E~E~T~D~2~0~F~3cc8 _ ___,
THIS10ETA1LicoRRESPONOS /
TO SHEET GRJ. .....---/ --.... ---,.-,--
I
" /A
:I
I
~
" ~ ~r----~---__:____:__ __ _:___:__ __ ; ------··---
' e
~
r
r.
"
''"' f f--------------------------------------------------, §
f
t
~
" u
u z
JO
20
10
r EXlSTING
GROUND
----" --I
\ I
I I
PROPOT
GRADE
SECTION A-A
CHANNEL. UNIT C
SCALE: HOR [ ZONT AL l "= I oo'
VERTICAL 1··=tO'
JO 30
20 20
10 10
SECTION B-B
CHANNEL, UN IT C
SCALE; HORIZONTAL !"=loo·
VERTICAL 1''=10'
PROPOSED
GRADE
(EARTHEN
DAMJ
JO
20
10
" .,,f----------------~-------~-------------~------------1 B PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN,
~ REFERENCE#:
~ 200500415 IN, Stnaams and Wetlands
APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTALDATUM: PROJECT
~o=> COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVD88
~~----------------~---D_E_T_A_IL_1 ___ ~D_A_T_E_,_0_1_12_0_10_6 _________ __,__-'S'-'H-"E'-'E'-'T'--'D"3'--"D"-F-"3"-8---'
Scurce: \IVl>DOT; 2004, KING COUNTY; 2004 J__ Lut upde\&d: 1 57:15 PM 111812006 I chriss I PW.\Engineenng\010\drawings\Permrt!I\.JARPA\10peOOEl12c d4 dgri
~N
,,
C
~
!')
I a a.
a:
~
"' • ~
0 a
"' -UQ;;:a"'tJ
~oq:i ~ 0 m >(Jlm Z .... ~o~ Gl > i= ·-oz CD
:; -I>,.~ ~ ..
g:;~~ 0
'101
---
cozz >om ..
-IC>
r.iz i!l~
a~> ;;i .... -· ;:' ~
;::J;,;; :::0 Ill
o -· ro 815 a~ oa.
a~
In
;;! ....
!')
~
" <o rn m"
:J: ~ §
mo~ ~ ~:,. o" ~ ~ ~ li2 0 .. :I:
"T1 $; ~
~ t:92
g:~
"
d • a a. •
"
,, ,,
0 ,,
0 In m
>! ,,
m .... > ~
THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS
TO SHEET GR4.
Fee:.
("'
DETAIL
STOP LOG WEIR STRUCTURE
SCALE1 I" = 2'
------/EXISTJNG -----L-GROUND ------
EL: l7.5'
EL. l7.0'
EL. I s.o·
EL, 14 ,Q'
NOTE1
3" STOP
LOG
I. SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS
FOR DETAIL ON PRE-CAST
CONCRETE STRUCTURE.
...... _ ....
SECTION A-A
G" STOP
LOG
PROPOSED
.GROUND
i.!.:.
lli
'--._
'--._
'~~·
'
r EXISTING _____ L GROUND
------
2· -6" !l..Lh ... , I
17.o·r.1 .
~
~ . ~ ; ·:1
1
: : • •• ~ I r PROPOSED ~ " • , , ' , , GROUND
EL. 14.0' , · .. ~ -~~1·-: ~-~-·;-~-.. ~ ~;-' •."r":.L..,.-//" / . ' ' ' ' : . ·"«: / ~ ~
EL. 15.0'
SECTION B-8
Source: WSDDT; 2004, KING COUNTY; 2004 I Last updated: 5 20.03 PM 111712006 l chnn
THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS
TO SHEETS GR3 AND GR4
30
v>Z o« a. ~
0~ 3" OF MULCH
l PW:\Enginaering\01 Oldraw1rigs\Permits\JARPAI 10pe00e1 2c_d5.dgn
6" OF LOW PERMEABILITY
SOIL ______ .....
0 WO v>z o« a. ~ Or ocw -------E=·
~lo
ff~
--~X~;T~N:-7-------
GROUND~
20
12" 3"
l7 .a ELEV, 17.0
r w w
" "'
"'
" r
w w
"'
w z
~
" u r
10 ....... .., .. -;
INCORPORATE A M[N[MUM OF 3" OF
COMPOSTE MATERIAL INTO EXISTING SOIL
INCORPORATE A MINIMUM OF 3" OF
COMPOSTE MATERIAL INTO EXISTING SOIL 0 WO EXISTING
GROUND
PURPOSE: Roadway improvements
r w w
" "'
"'
" r
3" OF MULCH
t::I LLL ..... v ~
"'
w z
~
6"
:g ~
a. ~ Or
o,w a. ,. ,_
17.0
6" OF LOW PERMEABILITY
SOIL, SEE NOTE 3
acl----~---~---~---~---~---~---~---~---+-u r ..
"
SECTION A-A GR4
UNIT C
SCALEz HORJZONTAL 1"=100'
VERT[CAL 1''=10'
SPRINGBROOK
REFERENCE#:
200500415
APPLICANT: WSDOT
DETAIL 5
PROPOSED/RETAIN:
IN: Streams and Wetlands
NEAR/AT: Renton
COUNTY: King STATE: WA
DATE: 01/20/06
30
20
10
HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT
VERTICAL DAT\JM: NAVO 88
SHEET D5 OF 38
THIS SHEET CORRESPONDS
TO SHEET GR4
JO -~ JO
-~
' 0
WO ~z
0~
~~
0~ ocw
~~
-----20 _ ~------20 ~ ~
-;;;-
-~----
~--~:l:TIN
GROUND
-~
PROPOSED
GRADE
10 10
I I I
SECTION 8-B GR4
SCALE: HORJZONTAL I "=50'
VERT I CAL l "=5.
PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN:
REFERENCE #:
200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands
NEAR/AT: Renton APPLICANT: WSDOT COUNTY: King STATE: HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT
WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 88
DETAIL 6 DATE: 01/20/06 SHEET 06 OF 38
~
!: z
0
0 u
~
THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS
TO SHEET GR5
2
I
·,.r·~·~·~·=·=·~·===--i·=~-·==·-~'r======-==~,
~1 I I ~ ..
l I -11---
"t I !
EX, 12" CPEP~ ~: : ~. '--__ /EX, 12" CPEP /\ _____ 1..._..,i I II
L __ '/-----·-~-:-~ : i~· ___ i{ _ _j
( -----I "' I . ----.-I \... _____ 1..._ j lt.'--___ _/
FROM DRAINAGE POND I I TO EXISTING STORM SYSTEM
I I
I 5, ~s" I
11----j------'-+'~--------11 ·
I I
c,'--,--'----.-----.-----~---+.-----.----------_--.-~ ~
PLAN
Ei' -8"
EXIST(NG
GROUND l
=-":..·:....::2.:.6:..:.2:..'_ ,k:n:r-"'"t===============F==~,;"""T"7' EL. 26.2' -~«< : ·~~. --
FROM DRAINAGE
POND
EL, 22.6l'
EL. 20.6'
~0* v»~ ~/ 0( ,0(-0(<, ' '»>~ '>'."' ... /'
/ ,~ /
NON-SHRINK
GROUT
0---
1 I
Y------
1
'--A, -;::._,A~1--~ //~« ~;;y
'>
\,
;..
DETAIL
SECTION
STORMWATER DIVERSJON STRUCTURE
SCALE1 1 "=2'
SLIDE
GATES
GR5
NON-SHRJNK
GROUT
------7\ TO EXISTING
I I STORM SYSTEM -------'f----
1
,-;::._,--_/ ~v
,0
'1-----------------------------------------------------I ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation
~
0
~
SPRINGBROOK
REFERENCE#:
PROPOSED/RETAIN:
200500415 IN: Streams and Weflands
APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTALDATUM: PROJECT
; COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVD66
0L_ _______________ _L_ ___ D_E_T_A_IL_7 ___ _j__D_A_TE_:_0_1_12_0_,os _________ _[_ _ _,s,,H,,Es,EccT---"D'--7---'0"'F::._,3ceB _ __J
• ;:
~-
5
0
0 z •
THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS
TO SHEET GR5
EL. 19.0'
/
PJPE OUTLET. UNIT 0
4' -Q"
12· -o"
TYPICAL DITCH SECTION
EXISTING
GROUND
FLARED ENO SECTION
FOR 12" PIPE
---
QUARRY SPALLS
l!O' !APPROX.l
DETAIL
PJPE OUTLET, UNIT D
SCALE1 N. T.S.
GR5
EL. 19.37 <PIPE OUTLET>
--'--,--s
',1/l··;: ' ' ,
t-----------------~---------~--------------~-------------i
~-PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN:
i 2ooffoo41' 5 ~~A::;~~:~t~:"'tlands
APPLICANT: WS00T HORlZONTALDATUM: PROJECT ~ COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALOA.TUM: NAV088
~ ~----------------~---D_E_T_A_I_L_B ___ ~_D_A_T_E_: _0_112_0_1_00 _________ ~--S~H~E~E~T~D~B~O~F~3~8-~
Source: WSDOT; 2D04, KING COUNTY: 20()4 J Lest updatoo: 1 53:14 PM 111812000 I chriH PW:\Engineering\01 Oldrawings\Permits\JARPA\ 10pe00e12c_d9.dgn
THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS
TO SHEET GR5, I I I I
I I I I I I 21
I I I I I <·
40
f--
1
30 i f ...
I
I
20
10
·o z ..
~
~ w
" ; I " z ;:
~ x w .. -
'"
'-
' w' ~,
~ ~,
g1~
f:1J VliN
ZIii
~i.
~,~
a::;_.1.IJ. w,
> " o;a::
,-
I -7----------
-r--+ --__ 1 I I I cl
I I -~----~--~-----~
L) I I I I I ii
c. I I I I I I
~1;;; I 1. I I :1
,1,0 I 1· ____ I_ I N' ZIN I I ---! -----t··
-I I , w-
llll11 I I o.1Ll'l
:1. I I I I ~I~
:rlci l ,,I-I z:~
~12 I I I ----I----l ---;:,i! n --
~1Q'.: L' --EXISTING GROUt,iD ,
1
I ~ __ ,_:, I I ,---l LI.I I I I , QiLoJ z
------I I I I 1-'2 -1--:::.. -...c.. ---! <C .... :E I I I ·U <r----u---
1 I I i-_, o.•o• , , ~ 1_ J_ I 0.40S
:~ I ----C--s
.0.40%
1
N I ;; I I
I
N I • • I I
-·,-r-;;:;I;;:; i i I !---l _ __ I I I.,'. I _;_;-T ---_I
300
, .1 • r ~:~ I ' 300'
-1-<':1~
g1~
·------·--L---·
I "' ~,~
~,~ 214'
12 IN. 12 IN. 12 IN.
o.4or~
I
I
~ ..
" ' .
L 'Z
I
N I -I 'z
I " ' ;:
u I w
I ~
" z w
I " w I ~ ..
~ ~-~
~
I -~
I !~
I -
I
EXISTING 10" SANITARY
SEWER EL. l2.65'
I I I 40 I i l -r---l----1--__ : ____ : ____ l ____ r
I I I I I
__ I __ ----J _____ I_ ----1----L
I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I
: ; : 1' JQ_ I '
I I I
I I I
I I ,
I I I 5'0
I
---------___ 1 ____ 1 ____ 1 ____ 1
1:~6?~0
--~:_:--:----!--i 11 _ io :_
,--I 0.50%
---HOR:IZONTAl 6
I
I
VER:T (CAL
0
I
I
5
I I I
I I ----------f--
1 ' '
. --i --r-----, ,------------
I -~
I 1··
I
SCAlEs
I
I
HORIZONT.AL J_t'.=.100.'.
VERTICAL 1"=10'
1
21"' u...
12 IN.
I I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. I
I
I
I
I
--I
,pa
I
I
110
PURPOSE: Roadway improvements SPRINGBROOK
REFERENCE #:
PROPOSED/RETAIN:
200500415
APPLICANT: WSDOT
DETAIL 9
IN: Streams and Wetlands
NEAR/AT: Renton
COUNTY: King STATE: WA
DATE: 01/20/06
HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 88
SHEET D9 OF 37
Source: WSDOT; 2004, KING COUNTY; 2004 l LBS! updatad: 5'20:53 PM 1/17/20CJEI
THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS
TO SHEET GR6
30
20
0
WO "'z o« a_ ~
0~ ocw
l chriH I PW:\Enginaoring\01 O\draw1ng!IP11rmrtsUARPA\ 10p800e1 2c d1 a.dgn
C:lo "'z o« a_ ~
0~
" w
a_ "
a_ "
-------------:.~ 0~ -.:,~:----~;b;~~ :;;;------------------
12" 3"
' ' \
\
\
\
\
\
I
}O
0
1o_J -.........:= _J / Uo
FINISHED
GRADE___, INCORPORATE A MIN(MUM OF Ji" OF
COMPOSTE MATERIAL INTO EXISTING SOIL
0 0
PURPOSE: Roadway improvements
SECTION B-B GR6
UNIT E
SCALE1 HOR[ZONTAL 1"=100'
VERTICAL l"=tO'
SPRINGBROOK
REFERENCE#:
200500415
APPLICANT: WSDOT
DETAIL 10
PROPOSED/RETAIN:
IN: Streams and Wetlands
NEAR/AT: Renton
COUNTY: King STATE: WA
DATE: 01/20106
HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 88
SHEET D10 OF 38
THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS
T0SHEETGR6
~ / EX. GROUND
.;
£
~ z
0
8
0 z
________________ a ____________ L __ _
IL_
3
DETAIL
f __JI J2L 3
LOW FLOW CHANNEL, UNITE
SCALE2 N, T.S,
GRG
FINISH GRADE
CWETLANO)
"1-------------------,-----------.----------------.------------1 ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN:
"
0
0 REFERENCE#:
~ 200500415 IN, Streams and Wetlands
NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT ~ APPLICANT: WSDOT COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVUS8
~ ~-----------------~----D_E_T_A_I_L_1_1 ___ ~_D_A_T_E_,_0_1_12_0_106 ___________ ~--S~H~E~E~T~D~1~1~0~F~3~8--~
~
~-
~
0 u
0 z
;THIS DETAIL
"CORRESPONDS
io SHEET GR6
LOW FLOW CHANNEL
BREACH -UNITE, TYP.
~ L EX. GROUND :~~/-------~ ---------------------------
cE~LE~V~a~·-----~-~/--------~------------~-------
TYPICAL SECTION A-A
BREACH -UNITE, TYP.
SCALE1 N.T.S.
FINISH GRADE
! BREACH BDTTOt.4l
TYPICAL SECTION B-B
BREACH -UNITE, TYP.
SCALEz N.T.S.
GR6
GR6
F !NISH GRADE
<BREACH BOTTOMJ
::::::...J 1
3 ELEV B'
ROCK LINED
TOE OF SLOPE
20
Foot
"1------------------~---------~--------------~------------I
~-PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN:
b REFERENCE#: i 200500415 INt Streams and Wetlands
APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTALOATUM: PROJECT
~o COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 88
•c_ ________________ ___L ___ o_E_T_A_IL_1_2 ___ ___Lo_A_T_E_,_01_,_20_10_6 _________ _._ _ _;S:cH.!tEC!EC.:Tc..eD_:_12=---.,0e_F-"3"-8 _ __,
~
f z
0
8
0 z
THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS
TO P SHEETS LEGEND
PLAN VIEW
DETAIL
EARTH ANCHOR
AND CABLE ITYP.1
18" DIAM. MIN.
10'-15' MIN. LONG TRUNK WITH
4' DIAM, ROOT WAD
ANCHORED LOG WITH ROOT WAD CABLE WRAPPING
StTE (El ONLY
SCALE1 N.T,S,
PLAN VIEW
DETAIL
18" DIAM. MIN,
I0'-15' MIN, LONG TRUNK WITH
4' O[AM, ROOT WAD
LOG WITH ROOT WAD CABLE WRAPPING
SITE CA,8,C! ONLY
SCALE1 N.T.S,
't-------------------.-----------.----------------,--------------1
' PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSEO/RETAtN:
i 20050041: 5 ~~At~~~~=~t~;:""tlands
APPLICANT: WSOOT HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT ~ DETAIL13 COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVDBB
-~----------------~---------~D_A_T_E_:_01_r2_0_106 __________ ~--S=H~E=E=T~D~13~0~F~3=8-~
THIS OET AIL CORRESPONDS
TO P SHEETS LEGEND
PLAN
MIN. BASE DIAMETER OF 6 IN.
MIN LENGTH OF 5 FT.
F[NISHED GRADE
SECTION
~
t z
" C u
0 z
DETAIL
BRUSH PILE
SCALEi N.T.S.
NOTE1 BRUSH PILES TO BE CONSTRUCTED
UT[LIZING TREES CLEARED FROM SITE
"f-----------------.------------.------------------,-------------1 ~ PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN:
C
b-REFERENCE#:
~ 200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands
:s: APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTALDATUM: PROJECT t COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAV088
~L_ ________________ _,._ ___ o_E_T_A_IL_1_• ___ _,.__o_A_TE_:_0_112_0_1_00 _________ -1 __ S,cH:..:E,c:E,,_T,._,D:..:1;;;4..:0"F---"3"-8-__J
~
~-
0 u
~
THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS
TOP SHEETS LEGEND
DOUBLE LAYER
HEAVY CARDBOARD---/-----11"-H-tTI
PLANT HUMMOCK WITH
SPECIFIED PALETTE
PEAT BASED SOIL
DOUBLE LAYER
HEAVY CARDBOARD
m
PLAN
;:;t-, ----=-=. =--",~~==~rt,\",,Siii°f""--------===:S~T~A:;,=;=,=:.~l~T~H:-:~,~o::"':o:;s':'1;,.:-~.!~1~1 c="'l1 r:11 f-~
:' '.;:-l;::;:;JJ,:_11, ;~ DOGWOOD o 3 O.C. -,,.=:Jll-
-m.__~~~~~U ELEVATION
DETAIL
HUMMOCK PLANTING
SCALEs N. T .S.
",------------------,-----------,------------------,-----------~
' PURPOSE: Wetland Mitigation s
0
~
SPRINGBROOK
REFERENCE#:
PROPOSED/RETAIN:
200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands
APPLICANT: WSDOT NEAR/AT: Renton HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT
@
0
" COUNTY: King STATE: WA VERTICALDATUM: NAVDS8
<c..._ ________________ _,_ ___ D_E_T_A_IL_1_s ___ _,_D_A_T_E_:_01_12_0_1oo __________ _J_ _ _:S,::H.:,E:c,E"T'--"D"-15"-"0"-F-3:e,8'----'
~ z
0
0
0
0 z a
'
THIS DETAIL CORRESPONDS
TOP SHEETS LEGEND
\111' 1 I
rn)1
:1111
/II i1 I
1: I~ '
, ll
1
1j I
' llli i
i111 11
~ 1111
i Ill Ii I :,
0 n
,~~~Y,1111 \,~~,_'-' //~illi ~~y ?;;v
~ /'<
'~ i » 11\'1 '/'
0 / ::1111, -
1111t ac
0
n
' -
I
DETAIL
VERT I CAL SNAG DETAIL
SCALE: N.T.S.
NOTE:
SNAC:S SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM SITE AS PRACTICABLE
PURPOSE: vVetland Mitigation SPRINGBROOK PROPOSED/RETAIN:
REFERENCE#:
200500415 IN: Streams and Wetlands
NEAR/AT: Renton APPLICANT: WSDOT COUNTY: King STATE:
DETAIL 16 DATE: 01/20/06
WA
HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT
VERTICALOATUM: NAVO 88
SHEET 016 OF 38
Source: WSDOT; 2004, KING COUNTY, 2004 I Last updated: J·J0:49 PM 1/1912000 I chriss. PW.\Engineering\O 1 O\drawings\Pemirts\jARPA\ 1Ope00e12c_d17 .dgn
THIS CETAIL CORRESPONCS
TOP SHEETS LEGEND 6" COMPACTED DEPTH ASPHALT
TREATED BASE fATBI
GEOTEXTILE
6" COMPACTED DEPTH CRUSHED
SURFACING BASE COURSE !CSBCJ
CULVERT AS
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS -SECTION A-A
120' MIN,
CULVERT AS REOUIRED-~~~~-r-----i
211 CTYP,)
~" TO 8" OUARRY
SPALL--...... ±2 '--' 5;
l '''" A ( "--/0 , .... __ .,>,( ......._/ 0,,-<'-.._ / Or~ 1"-------"-(')l..._/ \ 01 ,,. -V (\'-..___ r ./Q.,--~1
· 0 L"' ~_/ (~ vr-~/'\'v 9, '-~""' ro'O:i.!w-U/'\0 ~ ~ (~ '---:--{ )r,iJ 9' 1
·
z I ,--'--. _) l ) r', I --~ / ~ 1 / / ; I -~ , ) ( I ~ \ / • . ' '"-) r·p ,-,"---_/ v; ) ( ._) ;F,0 n _ _, ',0 ,'--; \ ) n0 ,';----"-) ( )I.._ ,I
-/ ,-'-.___/(, ',:' __ L) QO'--A to)" r-0 n( V 0~/ '---'"O <)_ 0 /' ,0 j \ () C) V VU 01 1
I \ 0( r-1-
0o o 001£b ~r -~ I~~ O;:::r~)?o o"" r
38" x-.. _
" " -N
" ~
_jA
MINIMUM BERM
HEIGHT TO BE 6'_/'
GREATER THAN PRE-LINED SUMP 25' DISCHARGE TO
SAN [ TARY SEWER
DR HOLDING TANK
PROPOSED
25' RADIUS
HEIGHT OF PAO
PURPOSE: Roadway improvements
70' MIN,
DETAIL
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS DETAIL
SCALE1 N. T .S.
SPRINGBROOK
REFERENCE#:
200500415
APPLICANT: WSDOT
CETAIL 17
NOTEt
PLAN I, THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCT[ON ENTRANCE AND
TIRE WASH FOR UNIT D SHALL NOT EXCEED
THE LIMITS OF THE EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAY,
PROPOSED/RETAIN:
JN: Streams and Wetlands
~·:AR/AT: Renton
COUNTY: King
DATE: 01/20/06
STATE: WA HORIZONTAL DATUM: PROJECT
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 88
SHEET 017 OF 38
o"~;Y ~~ d >+-. ""' .
~ -~ Kathy Keolkcr, Mayor
~N'1'0
Chuck Wagman
Zelman Renton LLC
14900 Interurban Ave. So. Suite 210
Tukwila, WA 98168
June 5,2006
Office of the City Attorney
Lawrence J. Warren
Senior Assistant City Attorneys
Mark Barber
Zanetta L. Fontes
Assistant City Attorneys
Ann S. Nielsen
Garmon Newsom II
Shawn E. Arthur
Re: Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank
Release of Easement
RECEIVED
JUN O 6 2006
CITY OF RENTON
Dear Mr. Wagman: UTILITY SYSl tMS
You and I have spoken on this matter several times. After I indicated that the City would not be
able to fully release your bond, but would be able to release a portion of the bond and change
that bond to a letter of credit or set aside letter, you were going to check with your bonding
company and respond to me. I subsequently have tried to reach you by telephone on at least two
occasions. I presume that you have been on vacation or otherwise occupied.
If the City's proposal to lessen the bond amount and change the bond to a letter oferedit or set
aside letter is not acceptable, then the City proposes to pay you a$1,000 for the necessary staff
and legal time to process the release of this easement. From the information that I have, the
easement is no longer an active easement and should have little direct value to your company.
The property in question is on the very edge of the proposed Wetlands Mitigation Bank and has
value to the City primarily as buffer.
If we cannot conclude an arrangement for the City to acquire the necessary release of easement,
then I would like you to so indicate so that I can terminate my efforts on this acquisition. While
the City would like to acquire release of this easement, the land is not valuable enough to the
City to continue to expend staff time and attorney time to acquir<J it if this process is going to
unnecessarily drag on.
The courtesy of an early response would be appreciated.
LJW:tmj
TI0.45:28 re: .,~ennao, PE
Jay Covington
-?::9Zv~
~~nee J. Warren
City Attorney
-P-o-st_O_ffi_ce_B_o_x_6_26---R-e-nt_o_n.-W-as-hi-.n-gt_o_n_9_8_0_57---(-42_5_) _25-5--8-67_8_/_F_A_X_(4_2_5_) 2-5-5--5-47_4_ ~
AHEAD-OF THE CURVE
I
AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO:
CITY OF RENTON PACIFIC NU TIT EAS
1055 S th G d W PAGE001 OF 030 ou ra Y ay 1010s1200& 09:23
Renton, WA 98055 KING COUNTY, UA
Attn: Surface Water Utility Engineering Supervisor
EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED
Kin · Records Division
-Deputy
.._je1< irJ..:::id-is~
GRANT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
Grantor: City of Renton
Grantee: Cascade Land Conservancy
~(s,
Legal Description
Ptn ofW 1/2 of Section 30, T23N, R5E, W.M. and Ptn of Section
25, T23N, R4E, W.M. and Ptn of NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 36, T23N,
R4E. W.M., all in the City of Renton, King County, Washington.
Additional legal description: at Exhibit A.
Assessor's Tax Parcel Nwnbers:
I) 125381-0090-05 (Unit A); 2) 252304-9004 (Unit B); 3) Ptn of252304-9019 (Unit C);
4) Ptn of 362304-9002-06 (Unit D); and 4)125381-0240-04 (Unit E)
3-/d-
~s,_~NT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Easement") is made as of the ---
day of//Z{J5/f(/l; 2006 by City of Renton, a mumc1pal corporat10n ("Grantor"), m favor of
Cascade Land Conservancy, a Washington nonprofit corporation ("Grantee") (collectively
"Parties").
1. RECITALS
1.1. Grantor is the sole owner in fee simple of that certain real property (the "Protected
Property") in King County, Washington, more particularly described in Exhibit A (legal
description) and shown on Exhibit B (site plan), which are attached and incorporated into this
Easement by this reference.
1.2. The Protected Property (Springbrook Creek Bank) possesses wetlands and other
fish and wildlife habitat ("Conservation Values"). Wetlands and other fish and wildlife habitat
Springbrook Conservation Easement October 3, 2006
on the Protected Property that are restored, enhanced, or otherwise created after the effective date
of this Easement shall also be considered Conservation Values.
1.3. The Conservation Values are a result of the Protected Property's inherent
ecological potential and of the existing and/or anticipated restoration and enhancement of
wetlands and other habitats on the Protected Property by Washington State Department of
Transportation ("WSDOT") and the City of Renton (collectively"Sponsors"). The foregoing
restoration and enhancement is intended to qualify the Protected Property for inclusion by
WSDOT and the City of Renton in a wetland mitigation bank and issuance of credits there from
("Mitigation Bank"). Additional restoration and enhancement of the Protected Property may
occur as identified and described in that certain Memorandum of Agreement and Mitigation
Banking Instrument for the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank, as may be
amended from time to time (collectively "Banking Agreements"), approved by the Washington
Department of Ecology and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ("Banking Agencies"), in
consultation with other certain public agencies (collectively, "Bank Oversight Committee").
1.4. The Springbrook Creek Mitigation Bank was established by WSDOT and the City
of Renton in coordination with, and approved by, the Banking Agencies. This Easement is a
condition of the operation of the Mitigation Bank. Grantee acknowledges that from time-to-time
Grantor may increase the real property that is subject to this Easement in furtherance of the
Mitigation Bank. Grantor and Grantee may amend this Easement to accomplish the foregoing as
provided in Section 12.1 below.
1.5. Grantor and Grantee intend that the Conservation Values be preserved and
maintained in perpetuity by permitting only those land uses on the Protected Property that do not
impair or interfere with the Conservation Values, which include, but are not limited to, such
restoration, enhancement, and recreational uses as further provided in this Easement.
1.6. Grantee is a publicly supported, tax-exempt nonprofit organization, qualified
under Sections 50!(c)(3) and 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and also
qualified as a nonprofit nature conservancy corporation under RCW 64.04.130 and RCW
84.34.250, whose primary purpose is to promote the preservation of open space and critically
important ecological systems in Snohomish, King, Pierce, and Kittitas Counties in Washington
State.
1. 7. Grantee agrees, by accepting this Easement, to preserve and protect in perpetuity
the Conservation Values and enforce the provisions hereof unless this Easement is sooner
extinguished or terminated as otherwise provided for herein.
1.8. The Parties acknowledge that this Easement does not provide standards or criteria
regarding the effectiveness of the Sponsors' restoration or enhancement of the Protected Property
and that this Easement is not intended to provide a basis for ensuring the effectiveness of such
restoration and enhancement or to obligate Grantee to ensure such effectiveness. The Parties
further acknowledge that such standards and criteria and the ability to ensure the effectiveness
thereof are provided for in the Banking Agreements and related documents.
Springbrook Conservation Easement 2 October 3, 2006
2. CONVEYANCE AND CONSIDERATION
2.1. For the reasons stated above, and in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms,
conditions, and restrictions contained in this Easement, and other good and valuable
consideration provided by the Parties, Grantor hereby voluntarily grants, conveys, and quit
claims to Grantee a conservation easement in perpetuity over the Protected Property, consisting
of certain rights in the Protected Property, as set forth in this Easement, subject only to the
restrictions contained in this Easement.
2.2. This conveyance is a conveyance of an interest in real property under the
provisions ofRCW 64.04.130 and RCW 84.34.210.
2.3. This grant shall be subject to easements, restrictions, interests, and water rights of
record as of the effective date of this Easement, including, but not limited to, those set forth in
Exhibit C, which is attached and incorporated into this Easement by this reference.
2.4. Grantor expressly intends that this Easement run with the land and that this
Easement shall be binding upon Grantor's successors and assigns.
2.5. This Easement does not transfer any water or water rights. This Easement also
does not transfer, or create any entitlement in, any credit from, or rights in the credits from, the
Mitigation Bank.
3. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Easement is to assure that the Protected Property will be retained
forever in its condition as wetland and other aquatic and riparian habitat of fish, wildlife, and
plants, providing the wetland, aquatic and riparian functions and values described in the Baseline
Documentation, and to prevent any use of, or activity on, the Protected Property that will impair
or interfere with the Conservation Values (the "'Purpose"). Grantor intends that this Easement
will confine the use of, or activity on, the Protected Property to such uses and activities that are
consistent with this Purpose. This Easement shall not be construed as affording to the general
public physical access to any portion of the Protected Property.
4. RIGHTS CONVEYED TO GRANTEE
To accomplish the Purpose of this Easement, the following rights are conveyed to
Grantee by this Easement:
4.1. Identification and Protection. To identify, preserve and protect in perpetuity,
unless sooner extinguished or terminated as otherwise provided under this Easement, and to
restore or enhance by mutual agreement, the Conservation Values.
4.2. Access.
4.2.1. To enter the Protected Property annually, at a mutually agreeable time and
Springbrook Conservation Easement 3 October 3, 2006
upon prior written notice to Grantor, for the purpose of making a general inspection to monitor
compliance with this Easement.
4.2.2. To enter the Protected Property at such other times as are necessary if
Grantee reasonably believes that a violation of the Easement is occurring or has occurred, for the
purpose of mitigating or terminating the violation and otherwise enforcing the provisions of this
Easement. Such entry shall be upon prior reasonable notice to Grantor, and Grantee shall not in
any case unreasonably interfere with Grantor's use of the Protected Property.
4.2.3. To enter the Protected Property, at mutually agreeable times and upon
prior written notice to Grantor, to exercise any other affirmative rights as expressly provided for
herein.
4.3. Scientific/Educational Use. To allow persons or groups to enter the Protected
Property for educational, scientific, and biological purposes to observe and study on the
Protected Property; provided that any such persons or groups first are approved by Grantor,
which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed, or conditioned, make prior
arrangements with Grantor, agree to provide Grantor with copies of any data or reports resulting
from such observation or study, and agree to abide by any reasonable restrictions on access set
forth by Grantor. Grantor and Grantee agree that all persons or groups given permission to enter
the Protected Property shall sign a waiver, substantially in the form attached to this Easement as
Exhibit D, which is incorporated herein by this reference. This waiver is intended to release
Grantor, Grantee and Assignee from all liability to the extent allowed by law.
4.4. Injunction and Restoration. To enjoin any use of, or activity on, the Protected
Property that is inconsistent with the Purpose of this Easement, and to undertake the restoration
of such areas or features of the Protected Property as may be damaged by uses or activities
inconsistent with the provisions of this Easement, all in accordance with Section 9.
4.5. Enforcement. To enforce the terms of this Easement, consistent with Section 9.
4.6. Assignment. To assign, convey, or otherwise transfer Grantee's interest in the
Protected Property in accordance with Section 13 and subject to Section 11.4.
4.7. Baseline Documentation.
4.7.1. Within sixty (60) days after the effective date of this Easement, within
sixty days (60) after the recording of any amendment hereof under Section 12.1 below and
thereafter as provided in Section 4. 7.2 below, Grantee shall document specifically the
Conservation Values in an inventory ofrelevant features of the Protected Property, which
Grantee shall maintain on file at its offices and which shall be incorporated into this Easement by
this reference ("Baseline Documentation"). The Baseline Documentation shall consist of
reports, maps, photographs, and other documentation that provide, collectively, an accurate
representation of the Protected Property. The Baseline Documentation is intended to serve as an
objective, although nonexclusive, information baseline for monitoring compliance with the terms
and conditions of this Easement.
Springbrook Conservation Easement 4 October 3, 2006
4. 7.2. As previously noted, the additional restoration and enhancement work
under the Banking Agreements that may occur on the Protected Property is likely to enhance
significantly the Conservation Values. Grantee may from time-to-time and as necessary update
the Baseline Documentation to reflect such work and to document the enhanced Conservation
Values resulting there from for purposes of monitoring compliance with the terms and conditions
of this Easement.
4.8. Maintenance of Protected Property. To control non-native, noxious weeds and
invasive weeds (collectively "Weeds"), the exercise of which shall be in Grantee's sole
discretion, and acknowledging that Grantor is required to comply with all applicable state and
local laws for controlling weeds on the Protected Property (see Section 5. JI .1, below). Grantee
shall provide Grantor 10 days prior written notice of its intent to exercise this right to control
Weeds on the Protected Property.
5. GRANTOR'S RESERVED RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS
5.1. General. Grantor reserves for itself and its successors and assigns all rights
accruing from ownership of the Protected Property, including, but not limited to, the right to sell,
lease, and devise the Protected Property and the right to engage in, or permit or invite others to
engage in, any use of, or activity on, the Protected Property that is not inconsistent with the
Purpose of the Easement and that is not prohibited by this Easement. Without limiting the
generality of this Section 5.1, Grantor specifically reserves for itself and its successors and
assigns, the following uses and activities:
5.2. Recreation. The undertaking of recreational activities on a non commercial
basis, such as hiking, bird watching and the public's use of the pedestrian trail provided for in
Section 5.5 below, provided that such activities are conducted in a manner and intensity that does
not cause more than a de minimis adverse impact on the Conservation Values.
5.3. Fences. The construction and maintenance of fences within or around the
Protected Property.
5.4. Habitat Stewardship, Restoration, and Enhancement. Constructing,
installing, planting, maintaining, and engaging in other activities to maintain or further restore or
enhance the Conservation Values in accordance with the Banking Agreements and any final
design, construction or management plans and bid specifications subsequently developed in
conformance with the Banking Agreements, as may be amended from time to time, ("Mitigation
Bank Plans and Specifications"), which may include, but are not limited to: planting and
irrigating plants; removing and controlling weeds; maintaining berms, log weir in Unit C, and
water conveyance structure in Unit D; and creating new wetlands. Grantor shall provide Grantee
Mitigation Bank Plans and Specifications relating to: any proposed use of herbicides for Weed
control; grading and excavation plans; the alteration or manipulation of natural water courses; or
the creation of new wetlands, water impoundments, channels or water courses and shall provide
Grantee with prior written notice of any material deviation from such Plans and Specifications
relating to such activities. Motorized and mechanized vehicles may be used in furtherance of,
Springbrook Conservation Easement 5 October 3, 2006
and to facilitate, the foregoing activities, provided that any off-road use thereof does not cause
more than a de minimis adverse impact on the Conservation Values. IfGrantor has conveyed or
assigned its rights to engage in the activities described in this Section 5.4 to Grantee or third
parties, Grantor covenants to not interfere with such restoration and/or enhancement, including,
but not limited to, by the exercise of any rights reserved to Grantor under this Easement.
5.5. Pedestrian Trail. Construction and maintenance of an elevated public pedestrian
trail generally eight feet in its width, constructed of plastic wood, cedar timber, and/or other
nontoxic materials, and located in Unit A at the approximate location shown on Exhibit B,
provided that the trail design and construction shall be in accordance with the Mitigation Bank
Plans and Specifications.
5.6. Maintenance. Taking various actions necessary to protect the Conservation
Values and other features of the Protected Property from beavers and to otherwise mitigate for
the impacts of beavers on the Protected Property, including, but not limited to, trapping beavers,
removing trees, installing devices to interfere with activities of beavers, and removing and
otherwise destroying beaver dams and lodges.
5. 7. Signs. The installation and maintenance of signs provided that such installation
does not cause more than a de minimis adverse impact on the Conservation Values. Signs in
excess of twenty-five (25) square feet in area need prior written approval by Grantee of sign
location and design.
5.8. Scientific/Educational Use. To allow persons or groups to enter the Protected
Property for educational, scientific, and biological purposes to observe and study on the
Protected Property. Grantor and Grantee agree that, with the exception of the general public's
use of the pedestrian trail provided for in Section 5.5 above, all persons or groups given
permission to enter the Protected Property shall sign a waiver, substantially in the form attached
to this Easement as Exhibit D, which is incorporated herein by this reference. This waiver is
intended to release Grantor, Grantee and Assignee from all liability to the extent allowed by law.
5.9. Protection of Health or Safety. The undertaking of other activities necessary to
protect health or safety, or that are actively required by and subject to compulsion of any
govermnental agency with authority to require such activity; provided that any such activity shall
be conducted so that significant adverse impacts on the Conservation Values are avoided, or, if
avoidance is not possible, minimized to the greatest extent possible under the circumstances.
5.10 Utilities Infrastructure. Routine maintenance, improvement, operation,
removal, repair or replacement of existing City of Renton and King County utilities currently
occupying those areas that are designated as "Reserved for City of Renton Utilities
Infrastructure" and as "King County Sewer Easement" on Sheets 12 through 19 inclusive of
the City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-06-095-LLA, recorded under King County
recording No. 20060824900007, copies of which are attached to Exhibit C to this Easement.
Springbrook Conservation Easement 6 October 3, 2006
5.11 Grantor's Obligations.
5.11.1. Noxious Weed Control. Grantor shall comply with all state and local
requirements for controlling noxious weeds within the Protected Property.
5.11.2. Structures, Facilities and hnprovements. Grantor shall maintain all
structures, facilities and improvements associated with the foregoing activities, including roads,
trails and fences, that are within the Protected Property and are merely incidental to the
functionality of the mitigation site, but that are necessary to Mitigation Bank management
activities, for as long as necessary to serve the needs of the Jong term management phase, as
described in the Banking Agreements and related documents.
5.11.3 Access & Non-Interference. Grantor shall provide access to the Banking
Agencies or their agents or designees as needed to fulfill their obligations, as set forth in the
Banking Agreements. In the event that Grantor assigns its responsibilities under the Long-Term
Management Plan ("Plan"), as provided for in the Banking Agreements, Grantor shall refrain
from impeding or otherwise interfering with implementation of the Plan. Activities in
furtherance of the Plan are to be carried out by the Sponsors or their assignees as approved by the
Banking Agencies. Such activities may include, but are not limited to, maintenance and repair of
water control structures; maintenance, repair, removal, or abandonment of structural elements of
the Mitigation Bank; and removal of invasive plant species.
6. USES AND ACTIVITIES INCONSISTENT WITH
THE PURPOSE OF THE EASEMENT
6.1. General. Any use of, or activity on, the Protected Property inconsistent with the
Purpose of this Easement is prohibited, and Grantor acknowledges and agrees that it will not
conduct, engage in, or permit any such use or activity. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, the following uses of, or activities on, the Protected Property, although not an
exhaustive list of inconsistent uses or activities, are inconsistent with the Purpose of this
Easement and shall be prohibited:
6.1.1. Subdivision. The legal or "de facto" division or subdivision of the
Protected Property, which shall include, but not be limited to, any subdivision, short subdivision,
platting, binding site plan, or other process by which the Protected Property is divided into lots.
This prohibition shall not be interpreted to preclude any lot line adjustment that does not create a
number oflots that is greater than the number oflots in existence on the effective date of this
Easement.
6.1.2. Construction. The placement, installation, or construction of any
buildings, structures, or other improvements of any kind, including, but not limited to, roads,
railroads, utilities, cellular phone towers, septic systems, wells, recreational facilities, and
parking lots, except as expressly provided in Section 5 above, including, specifically, those uses
and activities provided for in the Mitigation Bank Plans and Specifications.
6.1.3. Alteration of Land. The alteration of the surface of the land, including,
Springbrook Conservation Easement 7 October 3, 2006
without limitation, the excavation or removal of soil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, or sod, except in
conjunction with a use or activity expressly allowed in Section 5 above, including, specifically,
those uses and activities provided for in the Mitigation Bank Plans and Specifications.
6.1.4. Erosion or Water Pollution. Any use or activity that causes or is likely to
cause significant soil degradation or erosion or significant pollution of any surface or subsurface
waters. For the purposes of this Easement, the uses and activities expressly allowed under
Section 5 above, including, specifically, those uses and activities provided for in the Mitigation
Bank Plans and Specifications, shall be deemed to not violate this prohibition.
6.1.5. Removal of Trees and Other Vegetation. The pruning, topping, cutting
down, uprooting, girdling, or other destruction or removal of live and dead trees and other
vegetation, except as expressly provided in Section 5 above or in conjunction with a use or
activity expressly allowed in Section 5 above, including, specifically, those uses and activities
provided for in the Mitigation Bank Plans and Specifications.
6.1.6. Waste Disposal. The disposal, storage, or Release of Hazardous
Substances, rubbish, garbage, debris, unregistered vehicles, abandoned equipment, parts thereof,
or other offensive waste or material. The term "Release" shall mean release, generation,
treatment, disposal, storage, dumping, burying, or abandonment. The term "Hazardous
Substances" shall mean any substances, materials, or wastes that are hazardous, toxic, dangerous,
or harmful, or are designated as, or contain components that are, or are designated as, hazardous,
toxic, dangerous, or harmful, and/or that are subject to regulation as hazardous, toxic, dangerous,
or harmful or as a pollutant by any federal, state, or local law, regulation, statute, or ordinance,
including, but not limited to, petroleum or any petroleum product.
6.1. 7. Mining. The exploration for, or development and extraction of, oil, gas,
coal, limestone, fossils, metals, geothermal resources, sand, gravel, or rock of any type on or
below the surface of the Protected Property, except as expressly provided in rights ofrecord as of
the effective date of this Easement, as set forth in Section 2.3 and Exhibit C.
6.1.8. Recreational Activities. The undertaking of recreational activities and the
installation or construction of improvements in furtherance of the same, except as expressly
provided in Section 5 above.
7. NOTICE AND APPROVAL
7.1. Notice.
7.1.1. Grantor. Certain provisions of this Easement require Grantor to notify
Grantee and/or to receive Grantee's written approval prior to undertaking certain permitted uses
and activities (e.g., Sections 5.4 [habitat stewardship -material deviations form Mitigation Bank
Plans and Specifications], 5.7 [signage], and 11.3 [subsequent transfers]). The purpose of
requiring Grantor to notify Grantee prior to undertaking these permitted uses and activities is to
afford Grantee an adequate opportunity to ensure that the use or activity in question is designed
and carried out in a manner consistent with the Purpose of this Easement. Whenever such notice
Springbrook Conservation Easement 8 October 3. 2006
is required, Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing not less than thirty (30) days prior to the date
Grantor intends to undertake the use or activity in question. The notice shall describe the nature,
scope, design, location, timetable, and any other material aspect of the proposed use or activity in
sufficient detail to permit Grantee to make an informed judgment as to its consistency with the
terms of this Easement and the Purpose thereof.
7.1.2. Grantee. Certain provisions of this Easement require Grantee to give
notice to Grantor prior to undertaking certain activities (e.g., Sections 4.2 [access], 4.3
[scientific/educational use], 4.8 [weed control], 10.2 [taxes], and 13.1 [assignment]). Whenever
such notice is required, Grantee shall notify Grantor in writing not less than thirty (30) days prior
to the date Grantee intends to undertake the use or activity in question, unless otherwise provided
for by this Easement.
7.2. Approval. Where approval by one of the Parties is required under this Easement,
such approval shall be granted or denied in writing within thirty (30) days of receipt of a written
request for approval, and such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or
conditioned. Such approval may include reasonable conditions consistent with the Banking
Agreements that must be satisfied in undertaking the proposed use or activity.
7.3. Optional Consultation. If Grantor is unsure whether a proposed use or activity
is prohibited by this Easement, Grantor may consult Grantee by providing Grantee a written
notice describing the nature, scope, design, location, timetable, and any other material aspect of
the proposed use or activity in sufficient detail to permit Grantee to make an informed judgment
as to its consistency with the Purpose of this Easement and to provide comments thereon to
Grantor. This Section 7.3 does not itself impose a requirement of prior approval of the activity
described in any such notice.
7.4. Addresses. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication
that any party desires or is required to give to the others shall be in writing and either personally
delivered or sent by first class certified mail, postage prepaid, or by facsimile (if available) with
original dispatched by certified mail, addressed as follows, or to such other address as any party
from time to time shall designate by written notice to the others:
To Grantor:
To Grantee:
To Assignee:
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Attn: Surface Water Utility Engineering Supervisor
Cascade Land Conservancy
615 Second Avenue, Suite 625
Seattle, WA 98104
Attn: Senior Conservation Director
Washington State Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 47338
Olympia, WA 98504-7338
Springbrook Conservation Easement 9 October 3. 2006
Attn: Director, Real Estate Services
And to
Washington State Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 47331
Olympia, WA 98504-7331
Attn: Director, Environmental Services
8. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
8.1. Preventive Discussions. Grantor and Grantee will promptly give the other notice
of problems or concerns arising in connection with the other's actions under the Easement or the
use of or activities or conditions on the Protected Property, and will meet as needed, but no later
than fifteen (15} days after receipt of a written request for a meeting, to minimize the same. The
party giving notice according to this section shall provide a copy thereof to Assignee.
8.2. Mediation/Alternative Dispute Resolution. If a dispute arises between the
Parties concerning the consistency of any present or proposed use or activity with the Purpose of
this Easement, and ifGrantor agrees not to continue or proceed with the use or activity pending
resolution of the dispute, the Parties shall meet together to discuss the dispute and attempt
resolution. If the dispute is not resolved through preventive discussions, either party may
thereafter refer the dispute to mediation by request made in writing to the other with a copy to
Assignee, or the Parties may, by mutual agreement, utilize other forms of alternative dispute
resolution. Within thirty (30) days of the receipt of a mediation request, the Parties shall select a
single mediator to hear the matter. The matter shall be settled in accordance with any
Washington State mediation statute then in effect.
9. JUDICIAL RESOLUTION
9.1. Notice of Violation, Corrective Action. If either party determines that the other
is in violation of the terms of this Easement or that a violation is threatened, they shall give
written notice to the other of such violation and demand corrective action sufficient to cure the
violation and, where the violation involves injury to the Protected Property resulting from any
use or activity inconsistent with the Purpose of this Easement, to restore the portion of the
Protected Property so injured to its prior condition in accordance with a plan approved by
Grantee. The party giving notice according to this section shall provide a copy thereof to
Assignee.
9.2. Failure to Respond. Either party may bring an action as provided in Section 9.3
below if the other party:
9.2. 1. Fails to cure the violation within thirty (30) days after receipt of a notice
ofviolation; or
9.2.2. Under circumstances where the violation cannot reasonably be cured
Springbrook Conservation Easement 10 October 3, 2006
within a thirty (30) day period, fails to begin curing the violation within the thirty (30) day period
and fails to continue diligently to cure such violation until finally cured.
9.3. Action.
9.3.1. Injunctive Relief. Either party may bring an action at law or in equity in
a court having jurisdiction to enforce the tem1s of this Easement:
9.3.1.1. To enjoin the violation, ex parte as necessary and as allowed under the
applicable civil rules, by temporary or pennanent injunction; and
9.3.1.2. To require the restoration of the Protected Property to the condition that
existed prior to any such injury.
9.3.2. Damages. The prevailing party shall be entitled to recover damages for
violation of the terms of this Easement or injury to any Conservation Values protected by this
Easement. Without limiting Grantor's liability in any way, Grantee shall first apply any damages
recovered to the cost of undertaking corrective or restoration action on the Protected Property.
9.4. Emergency Enforcement. If Grantee, in its sole discretion, determines that
circumstances require immediate action to prevent or mitigate significant damage to the
Conservation Values, Grantee may pursue its remedies under this Section 9 without prior notice
to Grantor or without waiting for the period provided for cure to expire.
9.5. Scope of Relief. Grantee's rights under this Section 9 apply equally in the event
of either actual or threatened violations of the terms of this Easement. Grantor agrees that
Grantee's remedies at law for any violation of the terms of this Easement are inadequate and that
Grantee shall be entitled to the injunctive relief described in this Section 9, both prohibitive and
mandatory, in addition to such other relief to which Grantee may be entitled, including specific
performance of the terms of this Easement, without the necessity of proving either actual
damages or the inadequacy of otherwise available legal remedies. Grantee's remedies described
in this Section 9 shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to all remedies now or hereafter
existing at law or in equity.
9.6. Costs of Enforcement. Except as provided in Section 8.1 above, in the event a
party to this Easement finds it necessary to bring an action at law or other proceeding against the
other party to enforce any of the provisions of this Easement, or by reason of any breach or
default under fuis Easement, the prevailing party in any such action or proceeding shall be paid
all costs and reasonable attorneys' fees by the other party.
9.7. Discretion in Enforcement. Enforcement of the terms of this Easement shall be
at the discretion of Grantee, and any forbearance by Grantee to exercise its rights under this
Easement in the event of any breach of any terms of this Easement by Grantor, its agents,
employees, contractors, invitees or licensees shall not be deemed or construed to be a waiver by
Grantee of such term of any of Grantee's rights under this Easement. No delay or omission by
Grantee in the exercise of any right or remedy upon any breach by Grantor shall impair such
Springbrook Conservation Easement 11 October 3, 2006
right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.
9.8. Acts Beyond Party's Control. Neither Grantor nor Grantee shall be in default or
violation as to any obligation created hereby and no condition precedent or subsequent shall be
deemed to fail to occur if such party is prevented from fulfilling such obligation by, or such
condition fails to occur due to:
9.8. I. Actions by trespasser upon the Protected Property;
9.8.2. Forces beyond such party's reasonable control, caused by a natural or
human-caused catastrophic event or a deliberate and unlawful act by a third-party, which forces
by exercise of due diligence and foresight such party could not reasonably have expected to
avoid. A natural catastrophic event includes a flood equal to or greater in magnitude than the
100-year flood event, an earthquake of a force projected from an earthquake with a return period
of 475 years, or a debilitating drought, disease, wildfire, depredation, regional pest infestation, or
fluvioigeomorphic change. A human-caused catastrophic event includes war, insurrection, riot
or other civil disorders, spill of a hazardous or toxic substance, or fire. A deliberate and unlawful
act includes the dumping of a hazardous or toxic substance, vandalism, or arson; or
9.8.3. Any action deemed reasonable by Grantor under emergency conditions to
prevent, abate, or mitigate significant iajury to the Protected Property resulting from such causes.
In the event the terms of this Easement are violated by acts of trespassers, Grantor agrees, at
Grantee's option and expense, to join in any suit, to assign its right of action to Grantee, or to
appoint Grantee its attorney in fact, for the purpose of pursuing enforcement action against the
responsible parties.
9.9. Compliance Certificates. Upon request by Grantor, Grantee shall within thirty
(30) days execute and deliver to Grantor, or to any party designated by Grantor, any document,
including a letter of compliance, that certifies, to the best of Grantee's knowledge, the status of
Grantor's compliance with any obligation of Grantor contained in this Easement and otherwise
evidences the status of this Easement.
10. COSTS, LIABILITIES, TAXES, ENVIRONMENTAL
COMPLIANCE, AND INDEMNIFICATION
I 0.1. Costs, Legal Requirements, Liabilities and Insurance. Grantor retains all
responsibilities and shall bear all costs and liabilities of any kind related to the ownership,
operation, upkeep, and maintenance of the Protected Property.
10.2. Taxes and Other Costs. Grantor shall pay any taxes, fees and charges assessed
against the Protected Property by governmental authority as they become due, including taxes
imposed upon, or incurred as a result of, this Easement, and shall furnish Grantee with
satisfactory evidence of payment upon request. To preserve its rights under this Easement,
Grantee may, but is in no event obligated to, make payment of any taxes upon five (5) days prior
written notice to Grantor, in accordance with any bill, statement, or estimate procured from the
Springbrook Conservation Easement 12 October 3. 2006
appropriate authority, without inquiry into the validity of the taxes or the accuracy of the bill,
statement or estimate, and the obligation to Grantee created by such payment will bear interest
until paid by Grantor at the same rate imposed by the relevant governmental authority for the late
payment of the tax so paid by Grantee.
10.3. Representations and Warranties. Gran tor represents and warrants that to
Grantor's actual knowledge, and except as disclosed to Grantee in writing prior to the effective
date of this Easement:
10.3.1. There are no apparent or latent defects in or on the Protected Property,
such as an open well, garbage dump, abandoned underground tanks, or hazardous waste dump;
and
10.3.2. Grantor and the Protected Property are in compliance with all federal,
state, and local laws, regulations, and requirements applicable to the Protected Property and its
use, including, but not limited to, environmental laws, regulations, and requirements.
10.4. Control. Nothing in this Easement shall be construed as giving rise, in the
absence of a judicial decree, to any right or ability in Grantee to exercise physical or managerial
control over the day-to-day operations of the Protected Property, or any of Grantor's activities on
the Protected Property, or otherwise to become an operator with respect to the Protected Property
within the meaning of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability
Act of 1980, as amended ("CERCLA"), and the Model Toxics Control Act, as amended
("MTCA").
10.5. Grantor's Indemnification. Grantor shall hold harmless, indemnify, and defend
Grantee and its members, directors, officers, employees, agents, and contractors ( collectively
"Grantee Indemnified Parties") from and against all liabilities, penalties, costs, losses, damages,
expenses, causes of action, claims, demands, or j udgrnents, including, without limitation,
reasonable attorneys' and consultants' fees, arising from or in any way connected with breach of
its representations and warranties or injury to or the death of any person, or physical damage to
any property, resulting from any act, omission, condition, or other matter related to or occurring
on or about the Protected Property that is not a consequence of any action or omission of any of
the Grantee Indemnified Parties on or about the Protected Property.
10.6. Grantee's Indemnification. Grantee shall hold harmless, indemnify, and defend
Grantor and Grantor's members, directors, officers, employees, agents, and contractors
( collectively "Grantor Indemnified Parties") from and against all liabilities, penalties, costs,
losses, damages, expenses, causes of action, claims, demands, or judgments, including, without
limitation, reasonable attorneys' and consultants' fees, arising from or in any way connected
with injury to or the death of any person, or physical damage to any property, resulting from any
act, omission, condition, or other matter related to or occurring on or about the Protected
Property that is a consequence of Grantee's actions or omissions or the actions or omissions of
Grantee's members, directors, officers, employees, agents, or contractors on or about the
Protected Property.
Springbrook Conservation Easement 13 October 3, 2006
11. EXTINGUISHMENT, CONDEMNATION, AND SUBSEQUENT TRANSFER
11.1. Extinguisbment. If circumstances arise in the future that render the Purpose of
this Easement impossible to accomplish, this Easement can only be terminated or extinguished,
whether in whole or in part, by the Parties' mutual agreement and with the written approval of
the Banking Agencies, or by judicial proceedings of a court having jurisdiction. Unless
otherwise agreed to by the Parties, Grantee shall have no compensable interest in this Easement
under such circumstances and Grantee acknowledges that its compensation relating to its
obligations under this Easement is provided for under separate agreement with the Grantor. The
immediately foregoing provision shall be limited solely to the circumstances described in this
Section 11.1, and shall not be interpreted to have any application or inference to any other
provision of, or circumstance under, this Easement, including, but not limited to, those
provisions pertaining to Grantee's rights to enforce the terms of this Easement and Grantee's
rights to damages to, or the cost of restoring, the Conservation Values.
11.2. Condemnation. If the Easement is taken, in the whole or in the part, by the
exercise of the power of eminent domain, Grantee shall not be entitled to compensation and the
entirety of any compensation award shall belong to Grantor. The immediately foregoing
provision shall be limited solely to the circumstances described in this Section 11.2, and shall not
be interpreted to have any application or inference to any other provision of, or circumstance
under, this Easement, including, but not limited to, those provisions pertaining to Grantee's
rights to enforce the terms of this Easement and Grantee's rights to damages to, or the cost of
restoring, the Conservation Values.
11.3. Subsequent Transfers. Grantor agrees to:
11.3 .1. Incorporate the terms of this Easement by reference in any deed or other
legal instrument by which it divests itself of any interest in all or a portion of the Protected
Property, including, without limitation, a leasehold interest;
11.3.2. Describe this Easement in and append it to any executory contract for the
transfer of any interest in the Protected Property; and
11.3.3. Give written notice to Grantee of the transfer of any interest in all or a
portion of the Protected Property prior to the date of such transfer. Such notice to Grantee shall
include the name, address, and telephone number of the transferee or the transferee's
representative.
The failure of Grantor to perform any act required by this Section 11.3 shall not impair the
validity of this Easement or limit its enforceability in any way.
11.4. No Merger. In the event that Grantee acquires the fee title to the Protected
Property, it is Grantor's and Grantee's intention that no merger of title shall take place that
would merge the restrictions of this Easement with fee title to the protected property and thereby
eliminate them, and that the restrictions on the use of the Protected Property, as embodied in this
Springbrook Conservation Easement 14 October 3, 2006
Easement, shall, in the event title becomes vested in Grantee, become and remain permanent and
perpetual restrictions on the use of the Protected Property. Furthermore, the Grantee agrees to
incorporate the provisions in this Grant Deed of Conservation Easement in any subsequent
conveyance of an interest in the Protected Property.
12. AMENDMENT
12.1. Amendment to Expand Arca. Grantor and Grantee are free to jointly amend
this Easement to increase the real property that is subject to this Easement, provided that any
such additional real property is contiguous with the property that is already subject to this
Easement. Any such amendment shall be recorded in the official records of King County,
Washington, and any other jurisdiction in which such recording is required.
12.2 Other Amendments. If circumstances arise under which any other amendment
to or modification of this Easement would be appropriate, Grantor and Grantee are free to jointly
amend this Easement upon approval of such amendment or modification by the Banking
Agencies. Any such amendment shal I be recorded in the official records of King County,
Washington, and any other jurisdiction in which such recording is required.
13. ASSIGNMENT AND SUCCESSION
13.1. Assignment Generally. With Grantor's written approval, which will not be
unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed, and the Banking Agencies' written approval,
this Easement is transferable, but Grantee may assign its rights and obligations under this
Easement only to an organization that is authorized to acquire and hold conservation easements
under RCW 64.04.130 or RCW 84.34.210 ( or any successor provision(s) then applicable). As a
condition of such transfer, Grantee shall require that the transferee exercise its rights under the
assignment consistent with the Purpose of this Easement. Grantee shall notify Grantor in writing
forty-five (45) days prior to such assignment at Grantor's last known address.
13.2. Assignment to WSDOT. The Grantee agrees to assign this Easement to the
Washington State Department of Transportation ("Assignee") at such time as all of the
Assignee's banking credits have been sold, used or transferred, or the Sponsors have
permanently ceased banking activities, whichever occurs earlier (Termination of Assignee's
Mitigation Bank Operational Life). Assignee shall certify in writing to Grantor, Grantee and the
Bank Oversight Committee that the events necessary for Termination of Assignee's Mitigation
Bank Operational Life have occurred, and that Assignee requests Assignment of the Easement
pursuant to this Section. Upon Grantee's receipt of Grantor's written approval, which will not be
unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed, and receipt of the Banking Agencies' written
approval, Grantee shall assign, and WSDOT shall accept assignment under an Assignment of
Easement substantially in the form of Exhibit E. Assignee will be obligated to all terms of this
Easement and will hold this Easement as Grantee from that point on in perpetuity.
13.3. Succession. If at any time (a) it becomes impossible for Grantee to ensure
compliance with the covenants, terms, conditions and restrictions contained in this Easement, (b)
the Grantor and the Banking Agencies, or the Banking Agencies alone, determine that this
Springbrook Conservation Easement 15 October 3, 2006
Easement should be assigned due to any reasons of actual non performance by the Grantee,
including, but not limited to, circumstances under which actual non performance occurs because
Grantee is the holder of both the fee title to the Protected Property and this Easement, (c) Grantee
ceases to exist or to be authorized to acquire and hold conservation easements under RCW
64.04.130 and 84.34.210 (or any successor provision(s) then applicable), or (d) Grantee is
otherwise released from its liabilities and obligations under the Easement, then, if Grantee has
been provided forty five ( 45) days prior notice and opportunity to cure any non performance or
otherwise remedy any other circumstance forming the basis of any transfer under this Section
13.3, and subject to the Preventative Discussion provisions under Section 8.2 above if applicable,
Grantee's rights and obligations under this Easement shall become vested and fall upon the
Banking Agencies or such other entity, with purposes similar to Grantee's, that is authorized to
acquire and hold conservation easements under RCW 64.04.130 or RCW 84.34.210 (or any
successor provision(s) then applicable), to the extent that they shall accept this Easement;
provided that if such vesting is deemed to be void under the Rule Against Perpetuities, the rights
and obligations under this Easement shall vest in such organization as a court having jurisdiction
shall direct, pursuant to the applicable Washington law and with due regard to the Purpose of this
Easement.
14. RECORDATION
Grantee shall record this Easement in a timely fashion in the official records of King
County, Washington, and in any other appropriate jurisdictions, and may re-record it at any time
as may be required to preserve its rights in this Easement.
15. GENERAL PROVISIONS
15.1. Controlling Law. The interpretation and performance of this Easement shall be
governed by the laws of the State of Washington.
15.2. Liberal Construction. Any general rule of construction to the contrary
notwithstanding, this Easement shall be liberally construed in favor of the grant to affect the
Purpose of this Easement. If any provision in this Easement is found to be ambiguous, an
interpretation consistent with the Purpose of this Easement that would render the provision valid
shall be favored over any interpretation that would render it invalid.
15.3. Severability. If any provision of this Easement, or its application to any person
or circumstance, is found to be invalid, the remainder of the provisions of this Easement, or the
application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found
to be invalid, as the case may be, shall not be affected.
15.4. Entire Agreement. Except as to the Conservation Easement Reimbursement
Agreement for Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank, all prior discussions,
negotiations, understandings, communications, or oral agreements regarding this Easement have
been superseded by, and are merged into, this Easement.
15.5. No Forfeiture. This Easement does not convey any interest in the Protected
Springbrook Conservation Easement 16 October 3, 2006
Property other than the rights specifically provided herein.
15.6. "Grantor" -"Grantee". The terms "Grantor'' and "Grantee," wherever used in
this Easement, and any pronouns used in their place, shall be held to mean and include,
respectively the above-named Grantor. and its successors and assigns, and the above-named
Grantee, and its successors and assigns.
15.7. Successors and Assigns. The covenants, terms, conditions, and restrictions of
this Easement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the Parties to this Easement and
their respective successors and assigns, and shall continue as a servitude running in perpetuity
with the Protected Property, unless sooner terminated as expressly provided for herein. No term
or provision of this Easement is intended to be, or shall be, for the benefit of any person, firm,
organization, or corporation not a party to this Easement, and no such other person, firm,
organization, or corporation shall have any right or cause of action hereunder, except as
expressly provided in Section 13 above.
15.8. Termination of Rights and Obligations. A party's rights and obligations under
this Easement terminate upon transfer of the party's interest in the Easement or Protected
Property, except that liability for acts or omissions occurring prior to transfer shall survive
transfer.
15.9. Counterparts. The Parties may execute this Easement in two or more
counterparts, which shall be signed by all Parties. Each counterpart shall be deemed an original
instrument as against any party who has signed it. In the event of any disparity between the
counterparts produced, the recorded counterpart shall be controlling.
15.10. Recitals. Each recital set forth above is fully incorporated into this Easement.
15.11. Effective Date. The effective date of this Easement is the date of recording of
this Easement.
15.12. Authority. The individuals signing below, if signing on behalf of any entity,
represent and warrant that they have the requisite authority to bind the entity on whose behalf
they are signing.
15.13. Captions. The captions in this Easement have been inserted solely for
convenience and ease of reference and are not a part of this Easement and shall have no effect
upon construction or interpretation.
16. SCHEDULE OF EXHIBITS
16.1. Exhibit A-Legal Description of Property Subject to Easement.
16.2. Exhibit B -Site Map(s).
16.4. Exhibit C -Permitted Exceptions
Springbrook Conservation Easement 17 October 3, 2006
16.5 Exhibit D -Agreement for Release From Liability
16.6 Exhibit E -Assignment of Easement
To HA VE AND TO HOLD unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Grantor has executed this Easement this J~ay
of~ ,2006.
CITY OF RENTON, Grantor
The CASCADE LAND CONSERVANCY does hereby accept the above Grant Deed of Conservation
Easement.
Dated: /a ·if.Ob
CASCADE LAND CONSERVANCY, Grantee
THE WASHINGTON STA TE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION does hereby accept its designation
as Assi~ upon the occurrence of those events described in Paragraph 13.2 above.
Dated: 4,4::./t 3
1
,()-0() t,
Springbrook Conservation Easement 18
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
erv1ces
October 3. 2006
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
On this _1.iL_ day of Dt:h: L~ ( 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in
and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned ang_,swom, personally
appeared Ktc+JYj Kulllt\ to me known to be the/ljp..yal'~c;fry OF RENTON, the Washington
limited liability company that executed the within and foregoing Easement, and acknowledged
the said Easement to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said company for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said
Easement.
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
wJJ.d. Jt.u:t }1'J7.,1v1\.
OT ARY PUBLIC in and for the State of
Washington, residing at h, nftn
Print Name: A, 1 L41l lt ll/'lt ti 11 ,1
My commission expires "! 2-b{,"7
On this L./#' day of t'.}~W 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in
and for the State of Washington, dulx.,co~issioned and sworn, personally appeared ~Y
o' (..;::il'V:f Bt;i ,'f!RHOI' to me known to be the Pl1ict~ of Cascade Land Conservancy, the Washington
nonprofit corporation that executed the within and foregoing Easement, and acknowledged the
said Easement to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said
Easement.
WI1NESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the deal and year in this certificate
above written.
Springbrook Conservation Ea.semen/ 19 October 3. 2006
EXHIBIT A to
GRANT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
Legal Description of Property Subject to Easement
Units A, Band E of City ofRenton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-06-095-LLA, recorded under
King County Recording No. 20060824900007, as more particularly described in the attached
Sheet 2 thereof;
TOGETHER WITH Unit C of said Lot Line Adjustment, as more particularly described in the
attached Sheet 2 thereof, EXCEPT that portion of said unit lying northerly of the southernmost
line of the easement granted to Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. recorded under
King County Recording Number 20050303000964; and
TOGETHER WITH the north 721 feet of Unit D of said Lot Line Adjustment, as more
particularly described in the attached Sheet 2 thereof.
Situated in Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., and in Sections 25 and 36 of
Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., all in the City of Renton, King County, Washington.
Springbrook Conservation Easement 20 October 3, 2006
T. 23N. R. 4E. W.M. T. 23N. R. 5E. W.M.
~"' 4-)'\l ~,>'t~
I
\ C
0"'"''
25
0"''' \l
--
S~'fT'r 1,,;T-:r
I'\
;\
(r~,,_,, ~
ti
'~
=-,---,~=-=-::::::: I' -/1 11 1/-------ti A i
£1 ? ~'"''1
/. / I ~' i ~/. _J
JI -i ~q"r
··~ :i;
0~
~')
1'"' r
,_, ...
,_.; ~· "
s llo"<ll';T~
36
._,.: .....
w w
'Ct' LO
er: er:
l
'I)
~
f
!l
30
31
-----SPRINGBROOK CREEi< WETLANO
AND HABITAT 1,!ITIGATION BANK
BOUNDARIES.
-• --• --PEDESTRIAN TRAIL BOUNDARIES
= '"° 0 '" ,_
~CAL( l~ C(CT
EXHIBIT -B
EXHIBITCto
GRANT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
Permitted Exceptions
Those restrictions, reservations and protective covenants, and those easements identified as
"remaining" or "portion remaining," all as shown on Sheets 12 through 19 inclusive of the City
of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-06-095-LLA recorded under King County Recording
No. 20060824900007, copies of which are attached hereto.
Springbrook Conservation Easement 22 October 3, 2006
EXHIBIT D to
GRANT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
Agreement for Release from Liability
In consideration for pem1ission to enter certain property, the Springbrook Creek
Mitigation Bank, in King County, Washington, owned by City of Renton (hereafter the
"Protected Property") to observe and study the ecology of the Protected Property, I hereby
acknowledge and agree to the following:
1. My activities in the Protected Property involve many risks, including, but not limited to,
risks of bodily injury/illness or death resulting from accident, poisonous plants or animals;
2. I am entering the Protected Property at my own risk and I assume full responsibility for
the risk of bodily injury or death, whether foreseen or unforeseen, in connection with my
activities in the Protected Property;
3. I HEREBY RELEASE, WAIVE AND DISCHARGE CITY OF RENTON and their personal
representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns, and the CASCADE LAND CONSERVANCY and its
personal representatives, successors, and assigns from any liability for harm or loss suffered by
me in connection with my activities in the Protected Property, WHETHER BY NEGLIGENCE OR NOT,
and I FURTHER SAVE AND HOLD HARMLESS CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION, and their personal representatives, heirs, successors or assigns, and the
CASCADE LAND CONSERVANCY, and its personal representatives, successors, and assigns, from
any and all liability, actions, causes of action, claims, demands of every kind and nature
whatsoever by me or my family, estate, heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives,
successors or assigns arising out my activities in the Protected Property;
4. I hereby expressly agree that this "AGREEMENT FOR RELEASE FROM LIABILITY" is
intended to be as broad and inclusive as permitted by the laws of the State of Washington, and if
any portion thereof is held invalid, it is agreed that the balance shall, notwithstanding, continue
in full force and effect; and
5. This "AGREEMENT FOR RELEASE FROM LIABILITY" contains the entire agreement between
the parties hereto and that the terms of this Agreement are contractual in nature and not a mere
recital; I understand all of the terms; and I am of lawful age and legally competent to sign this
Agreement.
** I HA VE FULLY INFORMED MYSELF OF THE CONTENT OF THIS "AGREEMENT FOR RELEASE FROM
LIABILITY" BY READING IT CAREFULLY BEFORE SIGNING IT.
Name (pnnt) Signature
ate City/County/State
Springbrook Conservation Easement 23 October 3, 2006
EXHIBIT E to
GRANT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
Assignment of Easement
Springbrook Conservation Easement 24 October 3, 2006
AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO:
CITY OF RENTON
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Attn: Surface Water Utility Engineering Supervisor
ASSIGNMENT OF GRANT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
Assignor: Cascade land Conservancy
Assignee: Washington State Department of Transportation
Legal Description
Ptn ofW 1/2 of Section 30, T23N, R5E, W.M. and Ptn of Section
25, T23N, R4E, W.M. and Ptn of NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 36, T23N,
R4E. W.M., all in the City of Renton, King County, Washington.
Additional legal description: at Exhibit A.
Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers:
1) 125381-0090-05 (Unit A); 2) 252304-9004 (Unit B); 3) Ptn of252304-9019 (Unit C);
4) Ptn of362304-9002-06 (Unit D); and 4)125381-0240-04 (Unit E)
Reference Number of Related Document [Easement]: ________ _
THIS ASSIGNMENT OF GRANT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
("Assignment") is entered into by and between CASCADE LAND CONSERVANCY, a
Washington nonprofit company ("Assignor"), and the WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION, a state agency of the State of Washington ("Assignee") (collectively,
the "Parties").
RECITALS
A. Assignor is the Grantee under that certain Grant Deed of Conservation Easement,
made by the City of Renton, Grantor, in favor of Grantee, dated , 2006, and recorded
in the real property records of King County, Washington, under Auditor's File No.
_________ ("Easement"). The Easement is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
Springbrook Conservation Easement 25 October 3, 2006
B. The Easement provides for the preservation and protection in perpetuity of certain
real property located in King County, Washington (the "Protected Property"), as legally
described in Exhibit A hereto.
C. The City of Renton (Grantor of the Easement) and Assignee are collectively the
sponsors of a mitigation bank, known as the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation
Bank ("Mitigation Bank"). The Easement is a condition of the operation of the Mitigation Bank.
D. The Easement requires Assignor to assign the Easement to Assignee upon certain
events (Termination of Assignee's Mitigation Bank Operational Life), which events have now
occurred.
E. Assignee is authorized to acquire and hold conservation easements under RCW
64.04.130.
F. Assignor desires to assign all of its right, title and interest in the Easement to
Assignee, and Assignee desires to accept all right, title and interest in the Easement.
G. The City of Renton has provided Assignor with its written approval of this
Assignment, as have the Washington Department of Ecology and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (the Banking Agencies).
AGREEMENT
NOW THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound and for good and valuable
consideration, including the mutual covenants and promises of the parties, the adequacy and
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Assignment.
1.1 Assignor hereby assigns all of its right, title and interest in the Easement to
Assignee in consideration for Assignee's assumption of all of Assignor's stewardship and
management obligations under the Easement. Upon assignment, Assignor has no further rights,
responsibilities or obligations under the Easement.
1.2 Assignee hereby assumes all of the rights and obligations of Assignor as Grantee
under the Easement, and agrees to exercise its rights and obligations under this Assignment
consistent with the Purposes and terms of the Easement.
2. Assignee's address for notices to Grantee under Section 7 of the Easement is:
Washington State Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 47338
Olympia, WA 98504-7338
Attn: Director, Real Estate Services
Springbrook Conservation Easement 26 October 3. 2006
And
Washington State Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 47331
Olympia, WA 98504-7331
Attn: Director, Environmental Services
3. General Terms
3.1 Entire Agreement. This Assignment contains the entire integrated agreement of
the Parties, including all of the covenants and conditions between the parties, with respect to the
subject matter of this Assignment, and supersedes all prior correspondence, agreements, and
understandings, both oral and written.
3.2 Authority. Each undersigned representative of the parties certifies that he or she
is fully authorized to enter into the terms and conditions of this Assignment and to legally
execute, and bind such party to, this Assignment.
3.3 Recitals. Each recital and exhibit set forth above is fully incorporated into this
Assignment.
3.4 Effective Date. The effective date of this Assignment shall be the earliest date by
which both Assignor and Assignee have executed this instrument.
To HA VE AND TO HOLD unto Assignee, its successors and assigns forever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Assignor has executed this Assignment this_ day of
____ ,20_.
CASCADE LAND CONSERVANCY, Assignor
By __________ _
__________ [name]
_________ [title]
The WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION does hereby accept the above Assignment
of Grant Deed of Conservation Easement.
Dated:-----------~
Springbrook Conservation Easement 27
WASHING TON STA TE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
By. __________ _
__________ [name]
_________ [title]
October 3. 2006
STA TE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
On this __ day of 20 _, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for
the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared
___________ tome known to be the President of Cascade Land Conservancy, the
Washington nonprofit corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged
the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes
therein mentioned, and on oath stated thats/he is authorized to execute the said instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the deal and year in this certificate above
written.
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of
Washington, residing at. _______ _
Print Name: ___________ _
My commission expires. _______ _
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
On this __ day of 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for
the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared
__________ [name] to me known to be the [title] of the
Washington State Department of Transportation, the agency of the State of Washington that executed the
within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act
and deed of said agency for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that s/he is
authorized to execute the said instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the deal and year in this certificate above
written.
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of
Washington, residing at. _______ _
Print Name:. ___________ _
My commission expires. _______ _
Springbrook Conservation Easement 28 October 3, 2006
EXHIBIT A to
ASSIGNMENT OF GRANT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
Legal Description of Propertv
Units A, Band E of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-06-095-LLA, recorded under
King County Recording No. 20060824900007, as more particularly described in the attached
Sheet 2 thereof;
TOGETHER WITH Unit C of said Lot Line Adjustment, as more particularly described in the
attached Sheet 2 thereof, EXCEPT that portion of said unit lying northerly of the southernmost
line of the easement granted to Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. recorded under
King County Recording Number 20050303000964; and
TOGETHER WITH the north 721 feet of Unit D of said Lot Line Adjustment, as more
particularly described in the attached Sheet 2 thereof.
Situated in Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., and in Sections 25 and 36 of
Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., all in the City of Renton, King County, Washington.
Springbrook Conservation Easement 29 October 3, 2006
EXHIBITBto
ASSIGNMENT OF GRANT DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
Conservation Easement
Springbrook Conservation Easement 30 October 3, 2006
FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF
AFTERB RECORDING RETURN TO:
The City of Renton
1055 S. Grady Way, 5th Fl
Renton, WA 98055
111111111111111111
20060825002236
Attn: Ron Straka
PACIFIC NW TIT TERM 41,00
PAGE001 OF 010 08/25/2006 16:02
KING COUNTY, WA
RELINQUISHMENT OF ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT
Document Title: Relinquishment of Access and Utility Easement
Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: 8304250790
Gran tor: King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington
Grantee: The City of Renton
Legal Description: Lts 1, 2, 7 & 8, Blk 6; Lts 1, 6 & 7, Blk 7; Lts 1, 2 & 4, Blk 8,
Burlington Northern Ind. Park Renton II, Vol. 111, pg 42 and Ptn NEY. and NWY. of
Section 25, T23N, R4E, WM
Assessor's Property Tax Parcel No.: 125381-0090-05, 252304-9004-07, 252304-9019-
00, 125381-0230-06, 125381-0170-08, 362304-9002-06, 125381-0240-04
H-1\jj\ s-,11~, 1-a-'3 Jd.+ ""'\oS -I-;}-Cf0i,t1
KING COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDNISION OF THE STATE OF i ASHINGTON
does by execution of this document hereby terminate and relinquish any and all interest
KING COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDNISION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
has in the unrecorded agreement for sewer easement disclosed by Special Warranty Deed
No. BNRRPI-35A recorded April 25, 1983 under Recording Number 8304250790 and an
Easement dated October 17, 1967, recorded under Recording Number 6255262 to the
CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation the following described real property
situated in King County, in the state of Washington:
For legal description see Exhibit A and B
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Dated this
King County, a political subdivision of
The State of Washington
/_2r~
f-:1 Calvin Hoggard, Section Manager
Real Estate Services Section
EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED K!r.i Co. Reo;;;ds OMskn
BY. ~~\J""-~
Page 1 of 10 pages
8-2000-001
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that /),1~e /?-,e«;;st:h'j'Ts
the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that hsigned this
instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument, and
acknowledged it as the Section Manager Real Estate Services Section to be the free and
voluntary act of such entity for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Print Name: 1-/-vp(J U,,/1/(k;
Notary Public in and for the State of!
Washington.
Commi sion Expires:
t"/ ; i.Ct:9 My appointment expires
8-2000-001
Page 2 of 10 pages
EXHIBIT A
SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK
UNIT A
Parcel A
Lots 1, 2, 7 and 8, Block 6, Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II,
according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 111 of Plats, pages 42 through 44,
inclusive, records of King County, Washington;
Together with that portion of the former 20 foot railroad right-of-way, as delineated
on said plat adjoining said lots, as relinquished under Recording Number
8909110687.
UNITS BANDC
Parcel A
All those portions of Government Lot 11, of the southwest quarter of the northeast
quarter and the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 25, Township
23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the cast line of Government Lot IO in said Section at a
point 255.38 feet southerly, as measured along said east line, from the south line of
Henry Meader Donation Land Claim No. 46; thence westerly on a straight line to a
point on the easterly line of the Northern Pacific Railway Company Right-of-Way
at a point 289.12 feet southerly, as measured along said easterly line, from said
south line of the Donation Land Claim and the True Point of Beginning; thence
southeasterly to a point on a line parallel with and 60 feet east of said easterly line
of the Northern Pacific Railway Company Right-of-Way at a point 1,100 feet north
of the east-west centerline of said section; thence south, along said parallel line, to a
point on the south line of a tract conveyed to Broadacres, Inc. by deed recorded
under Recording Number 7504010373, said point being 545.6 feet north of said
east-west centerline; thence east, along said south line to the east line of the
southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section at a point 545.6 feet north
of said east-west centerline; thence south, along said east line, to the northwest
comer ofLongacres Parkway as delineated on the face
8-2000-001
Page ., of IO pages
EXHIBIT A
( continued)
of Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II, according to the plat thereof
recorded in Volume 111 of Plats, pages 42 through 44, inclusive, records of King
County, Washington; thence South 87°57'39" West 1,624.00 feet, more or less, to
the intersection of the northerly extension of the easterly line of the proposed P-1
channel as shown on the above referenced plat, said line being 20.00 feet, more or
less, west of the northwest comer of Lot 5, Block 9 of said plat; thence southerly,
along said extension, to a point which bears South 88°29'29" East from a point
being measured along the easterly line of said railroad right-of-way and 2,028.44
feet north of the south line of said Section;
Except that portion condemned by Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority
by King County Cause No. 02-2-21757-5 and as recorded under Recording Number
20020906001276;
Together with all those portions of Government Lot 9 and of the southeast quarter
of the northeast quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in
King County, Washington, described as follows:
Beginning at a point 20 feet west of the east line of Government Lot 9 and 1,254.20
feet south of the north line; thence North 88°24'48!.' West 1,029.43 feet more or less
to a point 300 feet east of the west line of Government Lot 9; thence South
01°01 '49" West on a line parallel to and 300 feet east of the west line of
Government Lot 9 and the west line of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter
of Section 25, 845.23 feet; thence South 88°24'48" East 1,032.55 feet more or less
to a point 20 feet west of the east line of said southeast quarter of the northeast
quarter; thence North 00°49'10" East 845.19 feet to point ofbeginning;
Except that portion conveyed for Southwest 27th Street by deed recorded under
Recording Number 8203150516;
Together with the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 25,
Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington;
Except the east 20 feet thereof;
8-2000-001
EXHIBIT A
( continued)
And Except any portion thereof lying within the Plat of Burlington Northern
Industrial Park Renton II, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 111 of
Plats, pages 42 through 44, inclusive, records of King County, Washington;
And Except that portion lying easterly of the following described line:
Beginning at a point on the north line of said southeast quarter of the northeast
quarter which is 300 feet east of the northwest corner; thence South 01 °01 '49"
West, on a line parallel to and 300 feet east of the west line of said southeast
quarter of the northeast quarter, to the north line of Lot 7, Block 7, Burlington
Northern Industrial Park Renton Il, according to the plat thereof recorded m
Volume 111 of Plats, pages 42 through 44,
inclusive, records of King County, Washington, and the terminus of said line;
And Except any portion thereof lying within the following:
Beginning at the northeast corner of said Government Lot 9; thence North
87°21 '38" West along the north line thereof a distance of20.0l feet to the west line
of the east 20 feet of said Government Lot 9; thence South 00°49'41" West along
said west line a distance of 1,254.20 feet to the north line of a tract of land
conveyed to the City of Renton by deed recorded under King County Recording
Number 7603250650; thence along the north line of said tract of land North
88°24'17" West a distance of 1,022.32 feet to a line parallel with and 300 feet
easterly of the west line of said Government Lot 9 and the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING; thence along said parallel line North 01 °07'49" East a distance of
45.00 feet; thence North 88°24'17" West a distance of 300.01 feet to the west line
of said Government Lot 9; thence along the west line of the southeast quarter of the
northeast quarter of said Section 25; South 01°07'49" West a distance of90.00 feet;
thence South 88°24'17" East a distance of 300.01 feet to a line parallel with and
300 feei easterly of the west line of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of
said Section 25; thence along said parallel line North 01 °07'49" East a distance of
45 feet to point of beginning.
Parcel B
All that portion of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King
County, Washington, lying westerly and northerly of the Plat of Burlington
Northern Industrial Park Renton II, according to the plat thereof recorded in
8-2000-001
Page 5 of 10 pages
EXHIBIT A
( continued)
Volume 111 of Plats, pages 42 through 44, inclusive, records of King County,
Washington, all being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the northwest comer of Lot 5 in Block 9 of said Plat of Burlington
Northern Industrial Park Renton No. II; thence North 88°32'51' West along the
north line of said plat, a distance of 20.00 feet to its intersection with the easterly
line of proposed P-1 channel; thence North 02°07'11" East along the east line of said
channel projected northerly a distance of 1,560.00 feet, more or less, to its
intersection with a line that bears North 87°57'39" West from the most
northwesterly comer of Longacres Parkway, as dedicated in the Plat of Burlington
Northern Industrial Park Renton II, said point being on the west line of Government
Lot 9 in the northeast quarter of said Section 25; thence South 87°57'39" East, a
distance of 1,624.00 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the northwesterly
comer of said right-of-way, said point also being on the west line of said
Government Lot 9; thence South O I 0 30'3 l" West along the westerly line of said
right-of-way, a distance of 1,570.12 feet to its intersection with the north line of
Block 9 of said plat projected easterly, said point also being the southeast comer of
the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 25; thence North
87°44'27" West along said north line, a distance of 1,347.99 feet; thence North
88°32'51" West along the north line of said Block 9, a distance of 275.79 feet to the
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Except that portion thereof conveyed to Burlington Northern Railroad Holdings,
Inc., by deed recorded under Recording Number 8911170955.
Parcel C
Lot 7, Block 7, Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton IT, according to the plat
thereof recorded in Volume 111 of Plats, pages 42 through 44, inclusive, records of
King County, Washington;
Except that portion of said Lot 7 conveyed to the City of Renton for road purposes
by deed recorded under Recording Number 8306090701 and as corrected by
Recording Number 8308050568;
Together with the west half of the former 20 foot railroad right-of-way adjoining on
the east, as relinquished under Recording Number 8909110687.
8-2000-001
Page 6 of 10 pages
Parcel D
EXHIBIT A
( continued)
That portion of Lots 1 and 6, Block 7, Plat of Burlington Northern Industrial Park
Renton II, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 111 of Plats, pages 42
through 44, inclusive, records of King County, Washington, lying north of the
following described line:
Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot I which lies North 01 °47'34" East
172.52 feet from the southeast corner thereof; thence North 88°29'29" West
parallel to the south line of said Lot I, a distance of 1,204.25 feet to the east line of
Oakesdale Avenue Southwest and the terminus of said described line:
Together with that half of Burlington Northern Railroad Right-of-Way adjoining
said described portion of Lots I and 6, as Quit-Claimed under Recording Number
8909110687;
Except that portion of said Lot 6, Block 7, conveyed to the City of Renton for street
purposes by deed recorded under Recording Number 8306090701 and as corrected
by Recording Number 8308050568;
(Also Known As Lot I, City of Renton Short Plat No. SHPL-125-89 recorded under
Recording Number 9103209006).
UNITD
Parcel A
That portion of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 36,
Township 23 North, Range 4 fast, W.M., in King County, Washington, lying
easterly of the Northern Pacific Railroad right-of-way and lying west of the
following described line:
Beginning at the northeast corner of Henry Adams Donation Land Claim; thence
east along the centerline of South 1801h Street (formerly Cord), 114 feet; thence
north 30 feet to the north line of aforesaid street and the True Point of Beginning;
thence north 644. 78 feet; thence northerly on a straight line, parallel to the east line
of said Northern
8-2000-001
!'age 7 of 10 pages
EXHIBIT A
( continued)
Pacific Railway Company right-of-way, to the north line of said Section 36 and the
terminus of said line;
Except the south 30 feet thereof;
And Except that portion described as follows:
Beginning at the southeast comer of said northeast quarter of the northwest quarter;
thence north 30 feet; thence west parallel with said south line of said subdivision, to
a point 19.95 feet easterly of, as measured at right angles to said Old Main Line
Tract centerline and the True Point of Beginning; thence north parallel with said
Old Main Line Tract centerline a distance of 213.40 feet; thence westerly as
measured at right angles to said Old Main Line Tract centerline, a distance of 20.95
feet to a point distant 50 feet easterly, as measured at right angles to said Old Main
Line Tract centerline; thence southerly along a line 50 feet easterly as measured at
right angles to said Old Main Line Tract centerline, to a point 30 feet north of the
south line of said subdivision; thence east to the point of beginning.
UNITE
Parcel A
Lots 1, 2 and 4, Block 8, Burlington Northern Industrial Park Renton II, according
to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 111 of Plats, pages 42 through 44, inclusive,
records of King County, Washington;
Together with that portion of the former railroad right-of-way as delineated on said
plat adjoining said lots, as relinquished under Recording Number 8909110687;
Except the north 463.95 feet of said Lot 4 as measured along the west line thereof;
8-2000-001
Page 8 of 10 pages
EXHIBIT A
( continued)
Also Except the north 463.95 feet of said former railroad right-of-way as measured
along the east line thereof;
And Also Except that portion of said Lot 2 described in deed to the City of Renton
recorded under Recording Number 8306090701 and correction thereof recorded
under Recording Number 8308050568;
(Also Known As Lot 1, City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LLA-92-090,
recorded under King County Recording Number 9206119003).
8-2000-001
Page 9 of IO pages
EXHIBITB
Portion of Easement to be relinquished as disclosed by
Recording Numbers 6255262 and 8304250790
A permanent easement on a strip of land IO feet in width being 5 feet on each side of the
following described centerline:
Beginning on the west line of Government Lot 9 and the west line of the southeast quarter
of the northeast quarter of Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, WM, in King
County, Washington at a point 414.43 feet southerly of the north line of said southeast
quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 25 as measured along said centerline; thence
South 88°25'03" East (said course being within the proposed right of way for South 165th
Street) a distance of 3607 feet, more or less, to the west line of 92nd Avenue South, also
known as Primary State Highway No. 5, except any portion thereof lying within the limits
of the drainage ditch belonging to the Drainage District No. l;
And except that portion lying within Oaksdale Ave SW.
8-2000-001
Page 10 of 10 pages
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/ BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
Date: July 19, 2006
To: City Clerk's Office
From: Stacy Tucker
Subject: Land Use File Closeout
Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City
Clerk's Office.
: Project Name:
; LUA (file) Number:
( Cross-References:
, AKA's:
Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank
LUA-06-017, SM
,----------------------------------------
' Project Manager:
'
1 Acceptance Date:
;, Applicant:
, Owner:
. Contact:
PID Number:
. ERC Decision Date:
: ERC Appeal Date:
l Administrative Approval:
; Appeal Period Ends:
: Public Hearing Date:
· Date Appealed to HEX:
By Whom:
· HEX Decision:
' Date Appealed to Council:
·, By Whom:
! Council Decision:
1 Mylar Recording Number:
Jill Ding
March 6, 2006
Allison Ray, WSDOT
City of Renton
Terry Drochak, WSDOT
1253810090; 2523049004; 1253810170; 1253810230;
2523049019; 3623049002; 1253810240
March 23, 2006
April 13, 2006
Date:
Date:
Project Description: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area.
· The proposed bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is
located within the Resource Conservation (RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large
wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site and Springbrook flows through portions of
the site bordering portions of Units A, B, and E. The proposed project would involve the creation, restoration,
and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of
transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA .
Determination of Non-Significance was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of
Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006.
Location: 1-405 Corridor & Springbrook Creek
Comments: State Department of Ecology requires a 21-day waiting period upon receipt of the approved
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Wait period ended: April 17, 2006
PARTIES OF RECORD
SPRINGBROOK WETLAND BANK
LUA06-017, SM
Terry Drochak
WSDOT -l-405 Project
600 108th Avenue NE ste: #405
Bellevue, WA 98004
tel: 206-456-8595
eml:
terry .d rochak@i405. wsdot. wa .gov
( contact)
Sandra Whiting
Department of Community
Development
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Blvd ste:
#100
Tukwila, WA 98188-2544
tel: 206-431-3663
(party of record)
Updated: 03/17/06
Allison Ray
WSDOT -l-405 Project
600 108th Avenue NE ste: #405
Bellevue, WA 98004
tel: 425-456-8610
(applicant)
Karen Walter
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
Fisheries Division
39015 172nd Ave SE
Auburn, WA 98092
tel: 253-876-3116
(party of record)
(Page 1 of 1)
STATE or WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
Northwest Regional Office• 3190 160th Avenue S[ • Re/levuc~ Washington 98008-5452 • (425) 649-7UOO
April 12, 2006
Allison Ray
I-405 Project Office
600 108th Avenue NE, Suite 405
Bellevue, WA 98004
Dear Allison:
Re: City of Renton Shoreline Substantial Development Permit #LUA-017, SM
Washington Dept. of Transportation/City of Renton -Owner/Applicant
Ecology Shoreline Substantial Development Permit# 2006-NW-50030
Purpose of this letter
This letter is to inform you that on March 27, 2006, the Department of Ecology received notice that the
City of Renton approved your application to develop the Springbrook Wetland and Habitat Mitigation
Bank to provide compensatory mitigation in advance of unavoidable impacts to wetlands and other
aquatic resources from future projects within portions of the Cedar-Sammamish Watershed (WRIA 8) and
the Green-Duwamish Watershed (WRIA 9). This 131.54 acre area contains 5 parcels in the Conservancy
and Urban shoreline designations of Springbrook Creek.
The law requires you to wait at least twenty-one (21) days from the date Ecology received this decision
from the City of Renton before you begin the specific activities authorized by this permit. This waiting
period is to allow anyone disagreeing with any aspect of your permit to appeal to the Washington State
Shorelines Hearings Board. The Shorelines I !earings Board will notify you by letter if they receive an
appeal, and if they do you must wait until the appeal is over before you start work.
To be sure that the Shorelines Hearings Bo"d hos not rec-.eived an appeal, we advise you to call them at
(360) 459-6327 before you begin work. Other federal, state and local permits may be required in addition
to this shoreline permit. Please contact me at 425-649-4260 or slan461@ecy.wa.gov if you have any
questions ab.out this lett~r.
Sincerely,
SL:cja ··
cc: Jill K. Ding, City of Renton,/
I
March 24, 2006
State Department of Ecology
Northwest Regional Office
3190 160th Ave. SE
Bellevue, WA 98008-5452
CITY • RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Worlcs Department
Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator
SUBJECT: Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit for
File No. LUA-06-017, SM
Dear Sir or Madam:
Enclosed is the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the above referenced project. The permit was
issued by the City of Renton on March 23, 2006. The environmental review (SEPA) was completed on
January 10, 2006 by WSDOT (see attached).
We are filing this action with the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General per WAC 173-14-090.
Please review this permit and attachments and contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions or
need additional information.
Sincerely,
~1{-~
Jill K. Ding -u
Project Manager
Enclosures: Copy of Master Application
Administrative Decision
Project Description
Wetland Bank Site Plan, Grading Sheets, Planting Sheets, and Detail Sheets
Notice of Application
Legal Description
JARPA
SEPA Threshold Determination
SEPA-Notice of Action Taken
cc: Office of Attorney General
Applicant/Owner
----:stote-co,...-fe,tte,,<k,e-10-5-5 -So_u_th_Gr_ad_y_W_a_y_--R-en-to_n_. -W-as-h-in_gt_o_n _9_80_5_5 ______ ~
{$1) This oaoer con tarns 50% rec11cled material. 30% oostconsumer
AHEAD OF THE CURVE
CITY OF RENTON
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971
PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT -~ii:.!§ .
SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITcc:~,~
-~=ic1 ·., ~uo111E
LUA-06-017, SM Jnl-_,\~r3,J1ir )__ APPLICATION NO.:
DATE RECEIVED:
DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE:
DATE APPROVED:
TYPE OF ACTION(S):
February 21, 2006 ~ ff-~'/ft/jj, ~lq I -'2--
March 6, 2006 \0~ ---,
March 23, 2006
[ X J Substantial Development Permit
Conditional Use Permit
Variance Permit
Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, the City of Renton has granted a permit.
This action was taken on the following application:
APPLICANT: WSDOT
PROJECT: Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank
DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION:
The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is requesting Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit approval for the development of the Springbrook Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank
(Springbrook Bank) by re-establishing, rehabilitating, enhancing, and preserving 131.54 acres of wetland and
riparian area. The proposed bank will increase overall wetland area, hydrologic functions, water quality
functions, habitat functions, and provide passive environmental education opportunities. The purpose of the
Bank is to provide compensatory mitigation in advance of unavoidable impacts to wetlands and other aquatic
resources from future projects within portions of the Cedar-Sammamish Watershed and the Green-Duamish
Watershed. The Springbrook Bank is composed of 5 sites, labeled Units A through E (see attached
description).
Construction of the Springbrook Bank would include extensive site grading on Units C and E; breaching the
existing earthen berms adjacent to Springbrook Creek on Units A, B, and E; removal and control of invasive
reed canary grass in Units A, B, and C; constructing an elevated boardwalk trail on Unit A; installing habitat
structures; and planting native woody vegetation on all units. This work is intended to enhance a broad range
of ecological functions to improve wetland habitat, water quality, and hydrologic functions.
Units A, B, C, and E are identified on the City's Shoreline Boundary Map as containing wetlands that are State
Shorelines as they are associated with Springbrook Creek. Unit D does not have wetlands associated with
Springbrook Creek, however a portion of the 200-foot Shoreline buffer from Springbrook Creek extends onto
the site. Units A, B, and E are classified as Conservancy Shoreline Environments and Units C and D are
classified as Urban Shoreline Environments.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
SEC-TWNP-R:
WITHIN SHORELINES OF:
APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM:
See attached
24-23N-4E, 19-23N-5E & 25-23N-4E
Springbrook Creek and it's associated wetlands
City of Renton
The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development:
LUA06-017shoreline.doc
CITY OF RENTON
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971
PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT
SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
APPLICATION NO.:
DATE RECEIVED:
DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE:
DATE APPROVED:
TYPE OF ACTION(S}:
LUA-06-017, SM
February 21, 2006
March 6, 2006
March 23, 2006
[X] Substantial Development Permit
Conditional Use Permit
Variance Permit
Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, the City of Renton has granted a permit.
This action was taken on the following application:
APPLICANT: WSDOT
PROJECT: Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank
DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION:
The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is requesting Shoreline Substantial
Development Permit approval for the development of the Springbrook Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank
(Springbrook Bank} by re-establishing, rehabilitating, enhancing, and preserving 131.54 acres of wetland and
riparian area. The proposed bank will increase overall wetland area, hydrologic functions, water quality
functions, habitat functions, and provide passive environmental education opportunities. The purpose of the
Bank is to provide compensatory mitigation in advance of unavoidable impacts to wetlands and other aquatic
resources from future projects within portions of the Cedar-Sammamish Watershed and the Green-Duamish
Watershed. The Springbrook Bank is composed of 5 sites, labeled Units A through E (see attached
description).
Construction of the Springbrook Bank would include extensive site grading on Units C and E; breaching the
existing earthen berms adjacent to Springbrook Creek on Units A, B, and E; removal and control of invasive
reed canary grass in Units A, B, and C; constructing an elevated boardwalk trail on Unit A; installing habitat
structures; and planting native woody vegetation on all units. This work is intended to enhance a broad range
of ecological functions to improve wetland habitat, water quality, and hydrologic functions.
Units A. B, C, and E are identified on the City's Shoreline Boundary Map as containing wetlands that are State
Shorelines as they are associated with Springbrook Creek. Unit D does not have wetlands associated with
Springbrook Creek, however a portion of the 200-foot Shoreline buffer from Springbrook Creek extends onto
the site. Units A, B, and E are classified as Conservancy Shoreline Environments and Units C and D are
classified as Urban Shoreline Environments.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
SEC-TWNP-R:
WITHIN SHORELINES OF:
APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM:
See attached
24-23N-4E, 19-23N-5E & 25-23N-4E
Springbrook Creek and it's associated wetlands
City of Renton
The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development:
L UA06-017shareline. doc
City of Renton PIBIPW Department
Springbrook Wetland Mitigation Bank
Section
4-3-090.J
4-3-090.1
4-3-090.L
4-3-090.L
Descn'ption
Urban Environment
Conservancy Environment
Specific Use Regulations -Stream Alteration
Specific Use Regulations -Trails
Shvreline Substantial Development Permit
Page 2of 2
Page
page 3-25
Page 3-24 & 3-25
page 3-36 & 3-37
page 3-37
Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions:
1. The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction
conditions provided in the application and modifications submitted to the City.
This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following:
1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant
from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements.
2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in
the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof.
3. A construction permit shall not be issued until twenty-one (21) days after approval by the City of Renton
Development Services Division or until any review proceedings initiated within this twenty-one (21) day
review period have been completed.
cc: Attorney General's Office
Applicant / Owners
Yellow File
LUA06-017shoreline.doc
date
City of Re ... on Department of Planning I Building I Public •• c, KS
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ipQ,(irS.. COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 20, 2006
APPLICATION NO: LUA06-017, SM DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 6, 2006
APPLICANT: Allison Rav -WSDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dina
PROJECT TITLE: Sorinabrook Creek Wetland Mitiaation Bank PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson
SITE AREA: 131.5 acres BUILDING AREA laross): N/A
LOCATION: South of SW 27'h St & west of Lind Ave SW WORK ORDER NO: 77551
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. The proposed
bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B. Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation
(RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site
and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A. B, and E. The proposed project would involve the
creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of
transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance
was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minar Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housinn
Air Aesthetics
Water Liaht/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shorehne Use Utilities
Animals Transnorlation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/
Natural Resources
Historic/Cultural
Preservation
Airporl Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
::ilu/1,,L (~/0Q -{/J·r)F?c:~ ~ /~v7_.?.5;
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is neede. properly assess.,this proposal
l.
Signature o Date r I
City o nton Department of Planning I Building I Pub , 'arks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Attn Re;l'r~ .. J COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 20, 2006
APPLICATION NO: LUA06-017, SM DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 6, 2006
APPLICANT: Allison Rav -WSDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dina ' ' "
PROJECT TITLE: Sprinqbrook Creek Wetland Mitiaation Bank PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson RECEIVEn
SITE AREA: 131.5 acres BUILDING AREA (aross): N/A . ~uuu
LOCATION: South of SW 27'" St & west of Lind Ave SW WORK ORDER NO: 77551 -· -
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a Wetland M1t1gat1on Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area.
0 o/~§1f;!%osed
bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation
(RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site
and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A, B, and E. The proposed project would involve the
creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of
transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance
was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued Januany 10, 2006.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housina
Air Aesthetics
Water Linht!G/are
Planls Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transnortation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas 1n which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additio , ormation is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Date
City o nton Department of Planning I Building I Pub _ 'orks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 20, 2006
APPLICATION NO: LUAOB-017, SM DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 6, 2006
APPLICANT: Allison Ra -WSDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Din
PROJECT TITLE: S rin brook Creek Wetland Miti ation Bank PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson
SITE AREA: 131_5 acres BUILDING AREA ross : N/A
LOCATION: South of SW 27'" St & west of Lind Ave SW WORK ORDER NO: 77551
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. The proposed
bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation
(RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site
and Springbrook fiows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A, B, and E. The proposed project would involve the
creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of
transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance
was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Eat1h
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
B. POL/CY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
Element of the Probable
Environment Minor
Impacts
Housinn
Aesthetics
LinhtJG/are
Recreation
Utilities
Transnortation
Public Services
HistoridCultural
PreseNation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
-n ,/4' (~,
Probable More
Major Information
Impacts Necessary
We have reviewed this application with parlicular attention to those areas in which we have experlise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where addition tion is needed to properly assess this proposal.
City o , n.-.. Department of Planning I Building I Pub .~
ENVIRONMENTAL &,DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 20, 2006
APPLICATION NO: LUA06-017, SM DATE CIRCULATED: MARC}l-a; 6
APPLICANT: Allison Ra -WSDOT PROJECT MANA
PROJECT TITLE: S rin brook Creek Wetland Miti ation Bank PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson
SITE AREA: 131.5 acres BUILDING AREA ross : NIA
LOCATION: South of SW 2i" St & west of Lind Ave SW WORK ORDER NO: 77551
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. The proposed
bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation
(RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site
and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A, B, and E. The proposed project would involve the
creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of
transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance
was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Ea1th Housina
Air Aesthetics
Water Liahl/Gfare
Plants Recreation
Lancf!Slloreline Use Utilities
Animals Transoorlation
Environmental Hea//11 Public Services
Energy/
Natural Resources
Historic/Cultural
Preservation
Airporl Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where a iti I information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
I
Date
City of Re, .• _n Department of Planning I Building I Public vL ... s
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: £rNS'P COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 20, 2006
APPLICATION NO: LUA06-017, SM DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 6, 2006
APPLICANT: Allison Rav -WSDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dino
PROJECT TITLE: Sorinobrook Creek Wetland Mitioation Bank PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson
SITEAREA: 131.5acres BUILDING AREA lnrossl: NIA
LOCATION: South of SW 27'h St & west of Lind Ave SW WORK ORDER NO: 77551
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. The proposed
bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation
(RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site
and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A, B, and E. The proposed project would involve the
creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of
transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance
was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housina
Air Aesthetics
Water Un ht/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transnortalion
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy! Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
/IA r./ 3)c)/(Y,
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
City o Department of Planning I Building I Pub s
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'Pr, ~ ~. I .:5\/C'). COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 20, 2006
APPLICATION NO: LUA06-017. SM• -._J DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 6, 2006 --
APPLICANT: Allison Ray -WSDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dina
1 •-vt;f V C:U
PROJECT TITLE: SprinQbrook Creek Wetland MitiQation Bank PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson MAR ll 7 ?nnc
SITE AREA: 131.5 acres BUILDING AREA laross\: N/A --
LOCATION: South of SW 27'" St & west of Lind Ave SW WORK ORDER NO: 77551 UTILITY SYSTEMS
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. The proposed
bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A. Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation
(RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site
and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A. B. and E. The proposed project would involve the
creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of
transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance
was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable
Environment Minor Major
Impacts Impacts
Earth
Air
Water
Plants
Land!S/10reline Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy!
Natural Resources
8. POL/CY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
\
,/ I I\ [ ,s,. er /, ___ I.('_/ )
More
lnforma tion
Necessary
.~ ...... r·/
-.,\ '·-):;
I ' _: ! ', _J (j
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Housina
Aesthetics
Liaht!Glare
Recreation
Utilities
Transoortation
Public Services
HistondCullural
Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feef
City o n Department of Planning I Building I Pu/ -· .. s
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
APPLICATION NO: LUA06-017, SM DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 6, 2006
APPLICANT: Allison Ray -WSDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Din
PROJECT TITLE: S rin brook Creek Wetland Miti ation Bank PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson
SITE AREA: 131.5 acres BUILDING AREA ross : N/A
LOCATION: South of SW 27th St & west of Lind Ave SW I WORK ORDER NO: 77551
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. The proposed
bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation
(RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site
and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A, B, and E. The proposed project would involve the
creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of
transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance
was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006.
A. ENV/RONMENTALJMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable Mare Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earlh Housina
Air Aesthetics
Water Liaht!Gfare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transnorlation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy! Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airporl Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
City o .... nton Department of Planning I Building I Pub .. c . .'arks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: h ~ COMMENTS DUE: MAf«,H-20; 2006 --·--.
APPLICATION NO: LUA06-017, SM DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH p, 2llQ6
APPLICANT: Allison Ray -WSDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dinq
PROJECT TITLE: Sprinqbrook Creek Wetland Mitiqation Bank PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson. 1.:/\P, -6 2006
SITE AREA: 131.5 acres BUILDING AREA loross):: NIA
" '' \ ·-
LOCATION: South of SW 27th St & west of Lind Ave SW WORK ORDER NO: 77551
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. The proposed
bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation
(RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site
and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A, B, and E. The proposed project would involve the
creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of
transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance
was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
E.arth Housina
Air Aesthetics
Water Liaht/G/are
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ HistaridCullural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
!-IA I, -
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS }Jf
C. CODE-RELA ;~') COMMENTS -f
i)0 ~\,u G,VJN1ls
We have reviewed his application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additi al information is ded to properly assess this proposal.
Date
City of ton Department of Planning I Building I Pub/, ,rks
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ('x_, L~-(f)r\ COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 20, 2006
APPLICATION NO: LUA06-017, SM DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 6, 2006
APPLICANT: Allison Rav -WSDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dina VII l , -
PROJECT TITLE: Sprinqbrook Creek Wetland Mitiqation Bank PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson HECEIVED
SITE AREA: 131.5 acres BUILDING AREA lnross\: NIA
LOCATION: South of SW 27'" St & west of Lind Ave SW WORK ORDER NO: 77551 -
, ............ 1v,u1u1-.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in area. The proposed
bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located within the Resource Conservation
(RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site
and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A, 8, and E. The proposed project would involve the
creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of
transportation projects by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance
was previously issued by WSDOT December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable Moro
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housino
Air Aesthetics
Water UohVGlare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Ammals Transoortation
Environmental Heal/h Public Services
Energy! Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Prese,vation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have revie ed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have experlise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where 'dd1t1onal mtprmat,on 1~ needed to properly assess /!us proposcJ!
/l.Ju/Jcwz. -
Signature of Director or Authorized Re esentative
A Master Application lias bffn filed and accepted wrth 111e 0,e.._1opmen1 Services Division of~ City of Renton.
The foHowin51 briefly describl!s the application and the necessuy Public Approvals.
PROJECT NAME/NUM8ER: Spr,ngbrook Creek Wetland Mtigation Bank I LUA00-017, SM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construcllon uf a Wetland Mr1igalion Bank on 6 parcels lo1amng 131 5 acres 0\
area The proposed bank is Klent1hed as 5 unit, (Un~ A, Unit B, Un~ C, Un~ 0, and Un~ E). The projed area is localed
w~hin the Resource Conservalion (RCJ and lnd<Jslnal Medium (IM) zoning desrgalions E,ght large wetfands total1r,g
approximalely 89 acres exist on the subjcc1 s11~ and Springbrook llows through portions ot the sr1e bordertng por1ions of
Unrts A. B, and E The proposed pro1cct wnula rnvolve the creatjon. restoraHon. and enhancement of wetland areas as
mrtigation for i'Tlpacts lo wetlands r;reJted lhmugh U1e ~onslruction of transporta1ion projects by the Washington State
Depar1ment of Transportation (WSDOTl A SEf'"-Delermination of Non-Significance was preWJ1Js/y issued by WSDOT
December 22, 2005 and a Notice o1 Action Taken W3~ issued January 10, 2006.
PROJECT LOCATION:
PUBLIC APPROVALS:
South ol SW 27"' Stree1 & west of Lind Awnue SW
Shoreline Subs1a11t1al ~velopment Perm~
APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON. Terry Drochak. WSDOT; Tel· (206) 456-8595;
Ernl terry ~rochak@i405.wsdot wa.go~
Comments on the abci~• application must be submitted in writing lo Jill Oing, Associate Planner, Development
Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. WA 9B055, by 5:00 PM on March 20, %006. If you hew questoons
abou1 this proposal. or w,sh lo be made a party of record and receive addttlonal not•fica1ion by mad. contact the Projed
Mana.,er at (425) 430.7219. Anyone who sutm,~s written comments will automatically become a par1y of record and wiN
ba notified of any decision on this projec1
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF APPLICATION:
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION:
DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION:
\
I
February 21, 2006
March 6, 2006
March 6, 2006
\ PROJECT LOCATION
II ;-A I
C
E /'
\
If )'QU would like lo be made a party or record 10 ,ece,ve further mronnalion on 1his proposed ~oject. complete th',s form
and return lo: Cty ol Renton. Development Plann,ng. 1055 South Grady Way. Ren1on. WA 98055.
FIie Name I No Spnngb(Uok Creek Well3n~ Mtigat1on Bank I LUA00-017, SM
NAME
MAILING ADDRESS -----
TELEPHONE NO
CERTIFICATION
I, ,~, // 1)1 ~ , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document
were po~ted by me _3_ conspicuous places or nearby the descnbed property on
DATE: Z.,/1, /Q(r,, I I
A TIEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Puhlic, in and fort ate of Washington residing in
, on the _/,__ day of \ l"l , I C \:"\
CITY OF RENTON
CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 5th day of March, 2006, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope
containing Acceptance Letter & NOA documents. This information was sent to:
Name
Allison Ray, WSDOT
Terry Drochack
Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only
(Signature of Sender):~~
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss
COUNTY OF KING )
Applicant
Contact
See attached
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker
Representing
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the u~~'ill\~111
purposes mentioned in the instrument. ~.::-.J,o'~ ~:,~~ ,.J}J,11
-~-.\ .. ' I QA, lt17'4t-_l11 ' I . --\!-' ,,. ~ ~· 'l
Dated:_:,,h IPL ~ '"l ._, 'd \-,c ~a," f ff~ or-1 ,'\1:;\
Notary Public in and for th tate of Wfsh~ton. • _ .,:\iJ
Notary (Print):
My appointment expires:
;,ii'. ui,~ ... ,
· · \ --~ "'v c., ff E Pwv":::n: c L '( n n :l:\1:\\ 1-r<' I'.:\ ~,.N ,:~:e .. .,..fJ:E
,,, oJ:.."''"'Y,.."'''~'.6A.;,,~ 1111 WAsl-\\1';;:..i,,"'
''""""''"
Project Name: Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank
Project Number: LUA06-017, SM
• •
125381027007
ADVENTURE 95 LIMITED PTNRSH
299 SW 27TH ST
RENTON WA 98055
088670040000
BOEING COMPANY THE
100 N RIVERSIDE M/C
5003-4027
CHICAGO IL 60606
125379001097
DIRECTOR OF REAL ESTATE
PUGET SOUND BLOOD CENTER
921 TERRY AV
SEATILE WA 98104
125381026009
GK SERVICES CO
ATIN: TAX DEPT
5995 OPUS PKWY #500
MINNETONKA MN 55343
125380012000
PIETROMONACO I L L C
PO BOX 700
MERCER ISLAND WA 98040
302305910002
TOSCO CORP
C/0 CONOCOPHILLIPS
PO BOX 1539
PASO ROBLES CA 9344 7
125381005508
BEDFORD PROPERTY INVESTORS
ATIN BEVERLY NILSON
270 LAFAYETIE CIR
LAFAYETIE CA 94549
630850010004
CALSMART LLC
6759 SIERRA CT SUITE E
DUBLIN CA 94568
252304905307 r,'-',1'\'{)\"Ct1 r,J0r1Lnci!n
DRAINAGE DIST 1 ',\ t\(l
C/0 JOHN NELSON
601 WEST GOWE
KENT WA 98033
125381014088
OAKESDALE COMMERCE CTR BSP
ALSO 125381-0130
2006 ADV DEP PD $36,487.85
2007 PLAT NEW MAJOR 630849 00000
362304903507
PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC
PROPERTY TAX DEPT
PO BOX 90868
BELLEVUE WA 98009
362304903408
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO
PROPERTY TAX
1400 DOUGLAS STOP 1640
OMAHA NE 68179
125381031009
BNSF RWY CO
PO BOX 961089
FORT WORTH TX 76161
252304900605
CITY OF TUKWILA
ATIN: ALAN DOERSHEL
6200 SOUTHCENTER BL
TUKWILA WA 98188
362304910403
DRAINAGE DISTRICT 1
PO BOX 297
KENT WA 98032
125381006001
OGIMA LL C
C/0 TRIMLITE INC
901 SW 39TH ST
RENTON WA 98055
088670033005
THE FEDERAL RESERVE BK SAN
101 MARKET ST
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
362304911104
ZELMAN RENTON LLC
515 S FIGUEROA ST #1230
LOS ANGELES CA 90071
A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton.
The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals.
PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank/ LUA06-017, SM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of a Wetland Mitigation Bank on 6 parcels totalling 131.5 acres in
area. The proposed bank is identified as 5 units (Unit A, Unit B, Unit C, Unit D, and Unit E). The project area is located
within the Resource Conservation (RC) and Industrial Medium (IM) zoning desigations. Eight large wetlands totaling
approximately 89 acres exist on the subject site and Springbrook flows through portions of the site bordering portions of
Units A, B, and E. The proposed project would involve the creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland areas as
mitigation for impacts to wetlands created through the construction of transportation projects by the Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A SEPA Determination of Non-Significance was previously issued by WSDOT
December 22, 2005 and a Notice of Action Taken was issued January 10, 2006.
PROJECT LOCATION:
PUBLIC APPROVALS:
South of SW 2?1h Street & west of Lind Avenue SW
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Terry Drochak, WSDOT; Tel: (206) 456-8595;
Em!: terry.drochak@i405.wsdot.wa.gov
Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jill Ding, Associate Planner, Development
Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on March 20, 2006. If you have questions
about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project
Manager at (425) 430-7219. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will
be notified of any decision on this project.
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF APPLICATION:
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION:
DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION;
February 21, 2006
March 6, 2006
March 6, 2006
PROJECT LOC~ TION
C BJ A)
• <·_'..
-~-, ~ROJEC.l -
,,, LOCATION
: -f.
If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project. complete this form
and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055.
File Name/ No.. Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank/ LUA06-017, SM
NAME: -------------------------------------
MAILING ADDRESS: _____________________________ ~
TELEPHONE NO.: ---------------
CITY .F RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator
March 6, 2006
Terry Drochak
WSDOT -1-405 Project
600 1081h Avenue NE #405
Bellevue, WA 98004
Subject: Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank
LUA06-017, SM
Dear Mr. Drochak:
The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the
subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is
accepted for review.
You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your
application.
Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions.
Sincerely, r..., ~/ '/7-
rl, ~~ '/ u· MillK.Ding
Associate Planner
cc: Allison Ray, WSDOT / Applicant
-------l-0-55-So_u_th_G_r-ad_y_W-ay---R-e_n_to-n,-W-as-h-in_gt_o_n_9_80_5_5 _______ ~
~ This oaoer contc1ins 50% rm::vr:100 material :\0% ~t ,.11m;11mP-r
AHEAD OF THF. CURVE
City of Renton
LAND USE PERMIT
PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION
NAME: City of Renton PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Springbrook
ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way
Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Project
CITY: Renton ZIP:
PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE:
98055
The proposed Springbrook Bank site consists of
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-430-7321 five land parcels (Units A through E), totaling
APPLICANT (if other than owner)
131.54 acres. The Springbrook Bank site is
located south of SW 27th Street and west of Lind
Avenue SW in the City of Renton.
NAME: Allison Ray
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER($):
COMPANY (if applicable): Washington State Dept.
of Transportation Unit A: 125381-0090
Unit B: 252304-9004 (NE portion), 125381-0170,
ADDRESS: 1-405 Project Office and 125381-0230
600 108th Ave NE, Suite 405 Unit C: 252304-9004 (portion located west of
Oakesdale Avenue SW) and 252304-9019
CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98004 Unit D: 362304-9002 (northerly 600 feet)
UnitE: 125381-0240
TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-456-8610
EXISTING LAND USE(S): Undeveloped land
CONTACT PERSON
PROPOSED LAND USE(S): The proposed project
NAME: Terry Drochak focuses on improving wetland area and function
and riparian functions near Springbrook Creek.
COMPANY (if applicable): Washington State Dept.
of Transportation EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
Employment Area Valley
ADDRESS: 1-405 Project Office
600 108th Ave NE, Suite 405 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
N/A
CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98004 EXISTING ZONING:
TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 206-456-
8595; terrJ1.drochak@i405.wsdot.wa.gov
Units A. B. C. and E: Resource Conservation (RC)
Unit D: Industrial Medium (IM)
PROPOSED ZONING (if annlicable): N/A
SITE AREA (in square feet): 5.729,905 square feet
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED
FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING
THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): N/A
Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planning/masterapp.doc 02/15/06
PRI :CT INFORMATION (contin i)
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET
ACRE (if applicable): N/ A
NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if annlicable): N/A
NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if annlicable): N/A
NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable):
N/A
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if aoolicable): N/A
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if aoolicable): N/A
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if aoolicable): N/A
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if aoolicable): N/A
NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if
aoolicable): N/A
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE
NEW PROJECT (if aoolicable): N/A
PROJECT VALUE: N/A
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE
SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable):
D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE
D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO
IZl FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft.
D GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft.
D HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft.
IZl SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft.
IZl WETLANDS 88.2 acres
Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planning/masterapp.doc 02/l5/06
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
I Attach leaal descriotion on seoarate sheet with the followina information included)
All units are located in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. Section, Township, and Range for each
unit is shown below.
Unit A: Section 30, Township 23N, Range 5E
Unit B: Section 25, Township 23N, Range 4E
Unit C: Section 25, Township 23N, Range 4E
Unit D: Section 36, Township 23N, Range 4E
Unit E: Section 25, Township 23N, Range 4E
TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES
List all land use applications being applied for:
1. Shoreline Substantial Development Use 3.
Permit
2. Critical Areas Ordinance
Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
I, (Print Name/s) Allison Ray, declare that I am (please check one) the current owner of the property involved in this application or X the authorized
representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the
information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
(Signature of Owner/Representative
(Signature of Owner/Representative)
Q:wcb/pw/devserv/forms/p\anning/masterapp.doc
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that A::l l 1· S,OV\ Da, h ~ ~0-1.
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for thl:1
uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Notary (Print)
My appointment expires: ~\ \ do-, d-C)C)"j
02/15/06
OE\/"1 0"11" >:i•v .· ~NT Pi.ANNING
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION . ' . clF RENTON
WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FEB 21 20a6
FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS RECEIVED
LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS:
. REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY:---= . · .
Calculations,
Colored Maps for Display 4
.
• u b1-. ... . .
Construction Mitigation Description zAND4
Deed of Right-of-Way Dedication, Ci~ Density Worksheet 4
Drainage Control Plan,
. \73 • -~I'.) OJJI...\/ 1(,;:_\.t aiw niil/\ c,\L J
Drainage Report, Jt_; \ ) .
. . . .. \ .. ,· Elevations, ArchitecturahANo• . 0b-. ... ...
Environmental Checklist, ,\'I) h 1\)2) • (YO ,SI' i,.,,., I .//,, ,V ' s-k 1'0
Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy), ···,·.·. : . :
. . .. . . , .....
Existing Easements (Recorded Copy)•
Flood Hazard Data, . . .
Floor Plans s AND ,4 dll . . . . .: ' . . · ... ,.
Geotechmcaf Report>ANo.3
. .. .....
Grading Plan, Conceptual,
.
Grading Plan, Detailed,
. ,·: .
..
•
.....
Habitat Data Report 4 ~.u Cc,n_f.,,,:-n <? • ..D wl,·n 1s ' Ass~ C \ . 1,..../09 i"co..
Improvement Deferral,
. V ':: (B 4)
.. ..
Irrigation Plan 4
King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site, ..... -_-:.-: ...... . .... . ..
. . ... .... .
Landscape Plan, Conceptual, I )rlJ r-orks.d-CG '1;;i ,d I J {\~'-"" o-f,,, ,
Landscape Plan, Detailed, .· ' .. · .. ,·· ,
. .
Legal Description,
.. ... . )1 ' .. .
List of Surrounding Property Owners, . .. ( e--7'-·-. .. .
Mailing Labels for Property Owners , ?1 . I\ f~f.---
.
Map of Existing Sit<! Conditions, . .
•
. . . .
Master Application Form,
Monument Cards (one per monument) 1
. ..
..
Neighborhood Detail Map 4
This requirement may be waived by:
1. Property Services Section
2. Public Works Plan Review Section
3. Building Section
...., I .l/ N,1,·+· 'J.? ~
PROJECT NAME: ~i~J'-f_f~'~l"~i~l"~q4'Y-~1~v~r~,(~l~i'~ .. -~I-' ·~~{..JCv(L ·'--
I G-1
oATE: -'-11 /-'l"""'C'-lf-'-'-'n6,_,_ ____ _
4. Development Planning Section
Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSER\f\Forms\Planning\waiver.xls 11104/2005
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS
LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED •
COMMENTS:
REQUIREMENTS: .. BY: BY:
Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis ,
Plan Reductions (PMTs) ,
·. . .:· .
. . .. .... : .. · .
Plat Name Reservation ,
Postage, . · .... .. . .. · .
••••
.. ·.· .. . . , .. :,<::::'" · .... .....
.:·::. _: '
Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 '{: [) me.e _ _+i''YI,.., S ~n r,1'Y\CI
Public Works ApprovalLetter, . •: i• J:_3 \J . \J. i cJ·· ',. _-·.:
. . . .
Rehabilitation Plan 4
Screening Detail,
... . .. · •••• • •••
·. .·
. · . . .. . . ··.·. ... . .... . ......
Site Plan 2 AND 4 ~ ,l) I?~,, r~c-0 oho,* ( ?,/ Jf;__ .x II
S!rearJl or-L.ake _Stu<ly,stand_ard 4 ···:.· :: ·. •::• . :_ -:: .....
.... . ..... . . ··-. :-.·-. ::· .:
Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental 4
Stream or Lake Mitigation Pian , .. .. ·
. ···
. ..
••••••• ... . . . ...
Street Profiles 2
Title Report or Pfat CertifiCate , _··,:: ····.·.·· =._ .· ... · .. .· · .
. . ..... . .··
Topography Map,
Traffic Study 2 •••··
. .:··.v . . ... •:·· .... ·.·: ., ' -··
Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4
Urban tenter t>i,iign 6v~~ay DlstrictRepprt •••• ••
... .. . .. . ·· . .....
.···· .. ·.· • .. .. . ....... · :::,
Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 ).?3 p., '/, ~ I\ NIL--
Wetlands MitfgatiOl'l F'l~h. Final 4
•·. i>. ·· ... ··· . ·:··· ... .· ..
• ••• .... . .....
····· ... .... . ... .... ···:::::.· : : ...
Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4
Wetlands Reportibeiirieafion ,
.. -· :_.-•• ·. ·:·::·_I· .. ...
• • •• . .... ... . ..
Wireless:
Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND,
Inventory of Existing Sites ,AND,
Lease Agreement, Draft , AND,
Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND,
Map of View Area 2 AND,
Photosimulations 2 AND,
This requirement may be waived by:
1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME:
2. Public Works Plan Review Section
3. Building Section
4. Development Planning Section
Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\waiver.xls 11/04/2005
SEPA-NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN
or, ltE'·"'o IN/NG _1 .. 1 N
FEB 2 1 2006
RECEIVED
Notice is given under SEPA, RCW 43.21 C.080, that the Washington State Department of Transportation
took the action described in (2) below on January 10, 2006.
I. Any action to set aside, enjoin, review, or otherwise challenge such action on the grounds of
noncompliance with the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW (State Environmental Policy Act) shall be
commenced on or before January 31, 2006.
2. Description of Agency Action:
Design approval of the project entitled: Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank
(Springbrook Bank).
3. Description of Proposal:
Washington State Department ofTransportatwn (WSDOT) and the City of Renton, in partnership, are
developing the Springbrook Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank (Springbrook Bank) by re-establishing,
rehabilitating, enhancing, and preserving 131.54 acres of wetland and riparian area located in the
southwest portion of the Renton, Washington. The Springbrook Bank will increase wetland area,
hydrologic functions, water quality functions, habitat functions and provide passive environmental
education opportunities.
The Springbrook Bank is located in the Lower Green River Basin within Water Resource Inventory Area
9 (WRIA 9). The purpose of the Springbrook Bank is to provide compensatory mitigation in advance of
unavoidable impacts to wetlands and other aquatic resources from future projects within portions of the
Cedar-Sammamish Watershed (WRIA 8) and Green-Duwamish Watershed (WRIA 9). The Springbrook
Bank is made up of five parcels, called Units A through E, described below.
Construction work includes extensive site grading on Units C and E; breaching the existing earthen berms
adjacent to Springbrook Creek on Units A B, and E; removal and control of invasive reed canarygrass in
Units A, B, and C; constructing an elevated boardwalk trail on Unit A; installing habitat structures; and
planting native woody vegetation on all units. This work will enhance a broad range of ecological
functions to improve wetland habitat, water quality, and hydrologic functions.
4. Location of Proposal:
The proposed Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank (Springbrook Bank) site consists
of five land parcels (Units A through E), totaling 131.54 acres. The Springbrook Bank site is located
south of SW 27th Street and west of Lind Avenue SW in the City of Renton.
Specific locations are as follows:
-
• Unit A is located immediately south of SW 27th Street, immediately north of developed
commercial shipping/warehouse facilities, immediately west of Lind Avenue, and immediately
east of and adjacent to Springbrook Creek. The undeveloped site covers 26.33 acres.
• Unit B is located immediately south of SW 27th Street, immediately north of developed
commercial shipping/warehouse facilities, immediately west of and adjacent to Springbrook
"2'1 Waahlngton Stat. .... .,. De..-,tment of Transponatlon
IOllililHliW U Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects
Creek, and immediately east of Oakesdale Avenue SW. The undeveloped site covers 36.49 acres.
Unit C is located immediately south of undeveloped land, immediately north of a developed
industrial shipping/railroad facility and undeveloped land, immediately west of Oakesdale
Avenue SW, and immediately east of an active Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad
right-of-way. The undeveloped site covers 47.90 acres.
• Unit Dis located immediately south of undeveloped land, immediately north of SW 43rd Street,
immediately east of an active BNSF Railroad right-of-way, and immediately west of a developed
commercial shipping/warehouse facility. The undeveloped site covers 5.60 acres.
• Unit Eis located immediately south of developed commercial shipping/warehouse facilities,
immediately north and west and adjacent to Springbrook Creek, and immediately east of
Oakesdale Avenue SW. The undeveloped site covers 15.22 acres.
5. Type of Environmental Review under SEPA: SEPA Environmental Checklist.
SEPA Environmental Checklist was approved by WSDOT on December 22, 2005. SEPA Decision
(Determination of Non-Significance) was adopted by WSDOT on January 10, 2006.
6. Project documents may be examined during regular business hours at:
WSDOT 1-405 Project Office, 600 108th Avenue NE, Bellevue WA, 98005, 425-456-8610
7. Name of Agency Giving Notice:
Washington State Department of Transportation.
8. This notice is filed by:
-"'/JI' Wuhlngton State
•", O.partment of Transportation
Allison Ray
1-405 Environmental Manager
Corridor Program U Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects
WAC 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS). FEB 2 I 2006
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE RECEIVED
Description of proposal: Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and the City of Renton, in
partnership, are developing the Springbrook Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank (Springbrook Bank) by re-
establishing, rehabilitating, enhancing, and preserving 131.54 acres of wetland and riparian area located in the
southwest portion of the Renton, Washington. The Springbrook Bank will increase wetland area, hydrologic functions,
water quality functions, habitat functions and provide passive environmental education opportunities.
The Springbrook Bank is located in the Lower Green River Basin within Water Resource Inventory Area 9 (WRIA 9).
The purpose of the Springbrook Bank is to provide compensatory mitigation in advance of unavoidable impacts to
wetlands and other aquatic resources from future projects within portions of the Cedar-Sammamish Watershed (WRlA
8) and Green-Duwamish Watershed (WRIA 9). The Springbrook Bank is made up of five parcels, called Units A
through E, described below.
Construction work includes extensive site grading on Units C and E; breaching the existing earthen berms adjacent to
Springbrook Creek on Units A, B, and E; removal and control of invasive reed canarygrass in Units A, B, and C;
constructing an elevated boardwalk trail on Unit A; installing habitat structures; and planting native woody vegetation
on all units. This work will enhance a broad range of ecological functions to improve wetland habitat, water quality,
and hydrologic functions.
Proponent: WSDOT, l-405 Project Office
The proposed Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank (Springbrook Bank) site consists of five
land parcels (Units A through E), totaling 131.54 acres. The Springbrook Bank site is located south of SW 27th
Street and west of Lind Avenue SW in the City of Renton.
Specific locations are as follows:
• Unit A is located immediately south of SW 27th Street, immediately north of developed commercial
shipping/warehouse facilities, immediately west of Lind Avenue, and immediately east of and adjacent to
Springbrook Creek. The undeveloped site covers 26.33 acres.
Unit B is located immediately south of SW 27th Street, immediately north of developed commercial
shipping/warehouse facilities, immediately west of and adjacent to Springbrook Creek, and immediately
east of Oakesdale Avenue SW. The undeveloped site covers 36.49 acres.
• Unit C is located immediately south ofundeveloped land, immediately north ofa developed industrial
shipping/railroad facility and undeveloped land, immediately west of Oakesdale Avenue SW, and
immediately east of an active Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad right-of-way. The
undeveloped site covers 47.90 acres.
Unit D is located immediately south of undeveloped land, immediately north of SW 43rd Street,
immediately east of an active BNSF Railroad right-of-way, and immediately west of a developed
commercial shipping/warehouse facility. The undeveloped site covers 5.60 acres.
• Unit E is located immediately south of developed commercial shipping/warehouse facilities, immediately
north and west and adjacent to Springbrook Creek, and immediately east of Oakesdale Avenue SW. The
undeveloped site covers 15.22 acres.
Lead agency: WSDOT
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21C.030 (2)(c). This decision was made after review ofa completed environmental checklist and other
information on file with the lead agency. This infomrntion is available to the public on request.
-;;,= Wuhlngtan Stat• Y/1 D..-rtm•nt of Transportatkin
0 There is no comment period for this DNS.
0 This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further
comment period on the DNS.
li!I This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14
days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by January 9, 2006.
Responsible official: Allison Ray, WSDOT
Position/title: 1-405 Environmental Manager
Interstate 405 (1-405) Congestion Relief and Bus Rapid Transit Projects Phone.:
(425) 456-8610
Address: 1-405 Project Office, 600 108~5, Bellevue, Washington, 98004
Date: December22,2005 Signature ~ ~
-;,: WHhlngton State
T/# D•partment of Transportation
0F.Vt~/C)i:?..'/,... '. :: n,, ~ ... f::II./T t"LA
At ment 4 -Project NarratiYe',.;:-f?F:Arro~tJING
. EB 2 1 2006
1 1NTR0DucT10N R1:c1:,Vi
The Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank (Springbrook Bank) site is ED
located in the southwestern portion of the City of Renton, Washington, Sections 25 and
36, Township 23N, Range 4E; and Section 30, Township 23N, Range 5E. It consists of
five units (Units A, B, C, D, and E), totaling 131.54 acres, which represent some of the
last remaining large tracts of undeveloped land in the Lower Green River Basin. The
King County Soil Survey describes four soil types at the Springbrook Bank site: Puget
silty clay loam, Puyallup fine sandy loam, Snohomish silt loam, and Woodinville silt
loam.
The City of Renton zoning designation for Units A, B, C, and E is Resource Conservation
(RC) and for Unit D is Industrial Medium (IM). For locations and zoning designations
of properties in the City of Renton, City of Tukwila, and the City of Kent that are
adjacent to Springbrook Bank, see Attachment 4A -Springbrook Bank Zoning Map.
All areas within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of Springbrook
Creek and its associated wetlands are regulated as Shorelines of the State by the City of
Renton Shoreline Master Program. According to the City of Renton Shoreline Boundary
Map and a previous shoreline exemption issued for this site (LUA-05-066, SME, CAR),
Unit A, Unit B, the northeast comer of Unit C, the southeast portion of Unit D that is
within 200 feet of Springbrook Creek, and the southeast portion of Unit E that is within
200 feet of Springbrook Creek are within the regulated shoreline boundary.
Eight large jurisdictional wetlands totaling approximately 89 acres exist on the site and
Springbrook Creek flows through portions of the site bordering portions of Units A, B,
and E. Springbrook Creek ultimately flows into the Black River via the Black River
Pump Station (BRPS). The BRPS and associated infrastructure prevents high flows in
the Green River from backing water up into Springbrook Creek, reducing the risk of
flooding in adjacent areas.
2 PROPOSED PROJECT
The proposed project focuses on improving wetland area and function and riparian
functions near Springbrook Creek. Construction work includes extensive site grading
Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank
City of Renton Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
Page 1
At ment 4 -Project Narrative
on Units C and E; breaching the earthen berms adjacent to Springbrook Creek on Units
A and B; opening Unit E to flooding from Springbrook Creek; removing and controlling
invasive reed canarygrass in Units A, B, C, and E; placing environmentally educational
signage on the constructed elevated boardwalk trail on Unit A; and installing habitat
structures and planting native woody vegetation in all units. This work will enhance a
broad range of ecological functions to improve wetland habitat, water quality, and
hydrologic functions.
A more detailed description of excavation and fill amounts for each unit within the
Springbrook Bank site is provided below in Section 2.1 and Section 2.2.
A temporary construction entrance will be installed within each unit and a tire wash
area will be installed in Units A, B, C, and E. The construction entrance will be
constructed using geotextile fabric topped with asphalt, which will be removed upon
completion of construction of the project. T11e tire wash water will be discharged to a
Baker tank and then either hauled off site to an approved discharge location or
discharged into a sanitary sewer. The exact method of removal will be determined by
the contractor.
Approximately 1 acre of trees in Unit A and 6 acres of trees in Unit E will be cleared as
part of site preparation, grading, and excavation; the cleared trees will be used as habitat
structures. The trees, which are primarily cottonwood and alder, will be replaced with
native trees and shrubs that match the hydrologic regime specific to that location.
The total estimated construction cost and fair market value of the proposed project
ranges from $7.5 to $8.5 million.
All land within the Springbrook Bank site currently is and will remain under ownership
of City of Renton; however, mitigation credits will be shared between the City of Renton
and Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT).
Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation B11Hk
City of Renton Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
Page 2
At ment 4 -Project Narrative
2.1 Excavation
Approximately 583 cubic yards of fill material will be excavated and removed as
part of the berm breaches on Units A and B. Approximately 100,000 cubic yards of
fill on Unit C and 160,000 cubic yards on Unit E will be excavated and removed to
re-establish former wetlands in those units. On Unit D, approximately 21 cubic
yards of soil material will be excavated and removed to install the drainage
conveyance pipe. Excavation will be required within the OHWM to breach the
berms on Unit E, and will be required within wetlands. Tables 1 and 2 detail the
volume and area of excavation in these areas.
2.2 Fill
Table 1
Volume and Area of Excavation within OHWM
Unit
• Unit E
•
Volume
(cubic yards)
908
Table 2
Area
(acres)
0.32
Volume and Area of Excavation in Existing Wetlands
Volume Area
Unit (cubic yards) (acres)
Unit A 24.5 0.06
Unit B 3.9 0.03
Unit C 7,917 1.75 .........................
Unit D 21 0.09
Fill material will be placed for habitat planting hummocks on Units A and B and soil
ditch plugs and the weir structure on Unit C. Table 3 provides a breakdown of the
fill amounts for each unit.
Table 3
Volume and Area of Fill in Wetlands
Volume
Unit (cubic yards)
Unit A 87.03
Unit B 61.02
Unite 528
Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank
City of Renton Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
Area
(acres)
0.02
0.03
0.26
Page3
At ment 4-Project Narrative
As part of the mitigation treatment throughout the bank, woody mulch will be
spread over approximately 20 acres to deter weeds. Table 4 provides a breakdown
of mulch that will placed in existing wetlands for each unit.
Table 4
Volume and Area of Mulch in Wetlands
Unit B
Unit C
3 LAND USE PERMITS
Volume
(cubic yards)
3,533
2,159
2,494
Area
(acres)
8.8
5.4
6.2
A Shoreline Substantial Development Permit will be required for the project
Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank
City of Renton Shoreline Substantial Developmenl Permit
Page4
ATTACHMENT 4A
SPRINGBROOK BANK ZONING MAP
Legend
D Resource Conservation • Industrial Light
D Industrial Medium • Industrial Heavy • Commercial Arterial
D Commercial Office
• Industrial Park
(City of Kent)
• Limited Industrial
(City of Kent)
Commercial/Light • Industrial
(City of Tukwila)
• Urban Center
(City ofTukwila)
Springbrook Creek
Springbrook Bank Zoning Map
ATTACHMENT 4A
Washington State Department of Transportation I Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank
'N.\~...,. .;,.,
,0':o· "'· . , .• \\ ;~'\
\.·' •,:'(" •. . ''' lo ,1~~ Attachment 5 -Con. .... ~ .1ction Mitigation Description
~~i 'L. ~'v
,'\e'.:,J~ requested in Question 6 of the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SSDP)
•. '·' Submittal Requirements list, this Construction Mitigation Description provides a written
narrative of the construction timing, as well as measures taken to mitigate construction
impacts.
Project work will begin during the fall of 2006 and extend through 2008, taking
approximately 24 months. The hours of operation for construction will be determined
by the contractor.
Truck traffic generated during excavation hauling may produce short-term impacts to
transportation, Washington State Department of Transportation (WSD01) and the City
of Renton are currently developing a haul plan in order to control impacts. This plan
will include hours of hauling (to avoid peak traffic times), haul routes (to avoid impacts
to traffic and to infrastructure), and traffic control plans (to provide safe access to the
sites). If nighttime work is required to accomplish the hauling in the timeframe needed
to meet the schedule, noise variances will be obtained.
Noise levels are not expected to be significantly greater than normal light-industrial
noise that is common in the area. Minimal air quality impacts are anticipated from the
engines of equipment during construction. Specific measures to reduce or control noise
and emissions will be determined by the contractor. In addition, the contractor will
coordinate with the City of Renton as part of the Public Works Construction Permit.
Measures will be employed to minimize temporary construction impacts. For a detailed
discussion of the measures to be implemented, please see Chapter 2 of the Biological
Assessment (Attachment 7 in this SSDP application).
Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank
City of Renton Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
Page 1
AGE\!CY lJSE ONLY
Agency Reference#:
Circulated by:
Date Recei\'ed:
(local govt. or agency) RE'CeiV
JOINT AQUATIC RESOURCES PERMIT APPLICATION FORM (JARPA)
(for use in Washington State)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT IN BLACK INK.
TO FILL IN ELECTRONICALLY. USE F11 TO MOVE THROUGH THE FORM
D Application for a Fish Habitat Enhancement ProJect per requirements of RCW 77.55.290. You must submit a copy of this
completed JARPA application form and the (Fish Habitat Enhancement JARPA Addition) to your local Government
Planning Department and Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Area Habitat Biologist on the same day.
NOTE: LOCAL GOVERNMENTS -You must submit any comments on these projects to WDFW within 15 working days.
Based on the instructions provided, I am sending copies of this application to the following: (check all that apply)
0 Local Government for shoreline: [R]Substantial Development 0Conditional Use []Variance 0Exemption 0Revision
(E]Floodplain Management (E]Critical Areas Ordinance
0 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for HPA (Submit 3 copies to WDFW Region)
0 Washington Department of Ecology for 401 Water Quality Certification (to Regional Office-Federal Permit Unit)
D Washington Department of Natural Resources for Aquatic Resources Use Authorization Notification
0 Corps of Engineers for: 0 Section 404 D Section 1 O permit
D Coast Guard for: D General Bridge Act Permit D Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects)
0 For Department of Transportation projects only: This project will be designed to meet conditions of the most current
Ecology/Department of Transportation Water Quality Implementing Agreement
SECTION A -Use for all permits covered by this application. Be sure to ALSO complete Section C (Signature Block) for all
permit applications.
1. APPLICANT
Allison Ray, Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), Interstate 405 (l-405) Congestion Relief and Bus
Rapid Transit Projects-Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Project
MAILING ADDRESS
1-405 Project Office, 600 108th Avenue NE, Suite 405, Bellevue, Washington, 98004
WORK PHONE I E-MAIL ADDRESS I HOME PHONE lFAX# ( 425) 456-861 0 allison.ray@i405.wsdot.wa.gov ( 425) 456-8600
If an agent is acting for the applicant during the permit process, complete #2. Be sure agent signs Section C (Signature Block)
for all permit applications
2. AUTHORIZED AGENT
Terry Drochak, Permit Specialist
MAILING ADDRESS
1-405 Project Office, 600 108th Avenue NE, Suite 405, Bellevue, Washington, 98004
WORK PHONE
I
E-MAIL ADDRESS
I
HOME PHONE
I
FAX#
(425) 456-8595 terry.drochak@i405.wsdot.wa.gov (425) 456-8600
3. Relationship of applicant to property: D OWNER D PURCHASER D LESSEE 0 Other
The proposed Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank (Springbrook Bank) is a partnership between the City
of Renton and WSDOT.
4. Name, address and phone number of property owner(s) if other than applicant:
City of Renton, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. (425) 430-7321
5. Location (street address, including city, county and zip code, where proposed activity exists or will occur)
The proposed Springbrook Bank site consists of five land parcels (Units A through E), totaling 131.54 acres. The
Springbrook Bank site is located south of SW 27th Street and west of Lind Avenue SW in the City of Renton. See
Attachment A-JAR PA Drawings, sheets V1 and T1 _ --
Specific locations are as follows:
• Unit A is located immediately south of SW 27th Street, immediately north of developed commercial
shipping/warehouse facilities, immediately west of Lind Avenue, and immediately east of and adjacent to
Springbrook Creek. The undeveloped site covers 26.33 acres.
• Unit B is located immediately south of SW 27th Street, immediately north of developed commercial
shipping/warehouse facilities, immediately west of and adjacent to Springbrook Creek, and immediately east of
Oakesdale Avenue SW. The undeveloped site covers 36.49 acres.
• Unit C is located immediately south of undeveloped land, immediately north of a developed industrial
shipping/railroad facility and undeveloped land, immediately west of Oakesdale Avenue SW, and immediately east of
an active Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad right-of-way. The undeveloped site covers 47.90 acres.
• Unit D is located immediately south of undeveloped land, immediately north of SW 43rd Street, immediately east of
an active BNSF Railroad right-of-way, and immediately west of a developed commercial shipping/warehouse facility.
The undeveloped site covers 5.60 acres.
• Unit E is located immediately south of developed commercial shipping/warehouse facilities, immediately north and
west and adjacent to Springbrook Creek, and immediately east of Oakesdale Avenue SW. The undeveloped site
covers 15.22 acres.
Local government with jurisdiction (city or county): City of Renton
Waterbody you are working in: Tributary of: WRIA#:
Springbrook Creek Green River 9
Is this waterbody on the 303(d) List** YES 11:J NOD
Shoreline designation:
If YES, what parameter(s)? Dissolved Oxygen, Fecal Springbrook Creek: Urban Environment
Coliform Associated Wetlands: Conservancy Environment
**For 303d List, Zoning designation:
htt~:l/www.eci.wa.gov/~rograms/wg/303d/index.html Units A, B, C, and E: Resource Conservation (RC)
Unit D: Industrial Medium !IM) y. Section Township Range Government Lot
Section Unit A: 30 23N SE DNR stream type if known:
Unit B: 25 23N 4E Springbrook Creek: DNR Type S
Unit C: 25 23N 4E
Unit D: 36 23N 4E
Unit E: 25 23N 4E
Tax Parcel Number:
Latitude and Longitude: Unit A: 125381-0090
Unit A: Lat. 47°27'28" Long. -122"13'26" Unit B: 252304-9004 (NE portion), 125381-0170, and 125381-
Unit B Lat. 47°27'29" Long. -122"14'10" 0230
Unit C: Lat. 47"27'19" Long. -122°14'24" Unit C: 252304-9004 (portion located west of Oakesdale
Unit D: Lat. 47°26'29" Long. -122"14'27" Avenue SW) and 252304-9019
Unit E: Lat. 47°26'49" Long. -122"14'08" Unit D: 362304-9002 (northerly 600 feet)
Unit E: 125381-0240
6. Describe the current use of the property, and structures existing on the property. Have you completed any portion of the proposed
activity on this property? D YES 11:l NO
For any portion of the proposed activity already completed on this property, indicate month and year of completion.
The current use of the Springbrook Bank site is undeveloped land. No building structures currently exist on the site.
Is the property agricultural land? D YES 11:l NO Are you a USDA program participant? D YES 11:l NO
7a. Describe the proposed work that needs aquatic permits: Complete plans and specifications should be provided for l!l! work waterward
of the ordinary high water mark or line, including types of equipment to be used. If applying for a shoreline permit, describe all work
within and beyond 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark. If you have provided attached materials to describe your project, you still
must summarize the proposed work here. Attach a separate sheet if additional space is needed.
The Springbrook Bank project proposes to increase wetland area; improve hydro logic functions, water quality functions,
habitat functions, and fish refuge/rearing habitat; and provide passive environmental education opportunities. The
Springbrook Bank will re-establish 17.81 acres of wetland, rehabilitate 52.92 acres of wetland, enhance 33.61 acres of
wetland, enhance 7.80 acres of upland, and enhance 6 88 acres of riparian upland adjacent to Springbrook Creek. The
project also proposes to establish a 40-foot-wide protection setback (buffer) by enhancing 9.86 acres of perimeter area on
portions of all units, except Unit D. In addition, the proiect proposes to construct an elevated boardwalk trail across Unit A,
thereby connecting the King County regional Interurban Trail to the King County regional Green River Trail. The timing of
work elements is described below and in question 8 of this JARPA.
See Attachment B Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument for a more detailed description of the overall site restoration
strategy.
Unit A
The work elements proposed on Unit A are wetland rehabilitation (20.30 acres), wetland re-establishment (0.05 acre),
riparian upland enhancement (0.65 acres), protection setback (buffer) establishment (2.67 acres), and construction of an
elevated boardwalk trail and adjacent vegetation enhancement within the trail zone (2.66 acres). Unit A encompasses
26.33 acres, of which approximately 23 acres are existing wetlands. A total of 12.4 acres of surface area is proposed to be
disturbed (that is, cleared, grubbed, or graded) on Unit A during construction; 0.7 acre of this disturbance is within existing
wetlands on Unit A A total of 10. 71 acres is proposed to be mowed and sprayed; 9.02 acres of this total surface area is
within existing wetlands.
Site Preparation: Initially, high visibility fencing will be installed around the perimeter of the site and around the perimeter
of all proposed work areas to prevent equipment intrusion into areas where no work is proposed. In addition, silt fencing
will be installed along the entire length of Springbrook Creek and silt fencing or a compost berm will be installed along the
perimeter of all proposed clearing, grubbing, and grading areas to prevent turbid water from entering Springbrook Creek
and adjacent areas where no work is proposed.
A temporary construction entrance and tire wash area will be installed at the northwest corner of Unit A within 200 feet of
the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) and an existing wetland. The construction entrance will be constructed using
geotextile fabric topped with asphalt that will be removed upon completion of construction of the project. The tire wash
water will be discharged to a Baker tank and then either hauled off site to an approved discharge location or discharged
into a sanitary sewer. The exact method of removal will be determined by the contractor.
In specific areas, existing reed canarygrass will be mowed immediately above the ground surface using small to medium
sized grass-cutting equipment. Mowing will occur in June/July before seeds are formed on the plant stalks. During the dry
periods of both August and September, the cut areas will be sprayed with glyphosate (Rodeo®) herbicide to control below
ground roots and rhizomes. Once the reed canarygrass has been mowed and treated, it will be re-used as mulch.
Himalayan blackberry will be mowed and sprayed in selected areas in preparation for the planting of native woody species.
In other specifically prescribed areas, such as the earthen berm breach locations and the elevated boardwalk trail location,
the surface vegetation will be cleared and grubbed to accommodate subsequent grading and boardwalk construction.
For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheet SP1; Attachment B Draft Final Mitigation Bank
Instrument; and Attachment C -90% Design Plans.
Grading: During the dry weather season, the existing earthen berm along the eastern edge of Springbrook Creek will be
breached in three locations in order to reconnect Springbrook Creek with its historic floodplain. The breaches, which will
be excavated using mechanical excavators (i.e., backhoe), will measure 20 feet wide and will be approximately 2 to 3 feet
deep to match the existing ground surface elevation of the adjacent wetland. Approximately 583 cubic yards of fill material
will be excavated and removed as part of the berm breaches on Units A and B. The maximum side slope of the breaches
will be 3: 1 (horizontal to vertical). Disturbed soil areas near Springbrook Creek will be protected with a permanent erosion
control blanket to prevent erosion. All excavated material will be removed from the site and disposed of at a WSDOT-
approved upland site. The exact location of the disposal site will be determined by the contractor.
A minimum of two habitat structures (vertical snags, brush piles and/or large woody debris) per acre and two planting
hummocks per acre will be installed in reed canarygrass removal and treatment areas. Habitat structures and planting
hummocks will be installed using a combination of a mechanical excavator and hand tools.
An 8-foot-wide elevated boardwalk trail will also be constructed approximately 3 feet above the existing ground surface
elevation. The trail will be built using a combination of both Copper Azole treated wood and recycled plastic lumber.
Construction materials will be transported on site using a light truck. The elevated boardwalk trail will be supported by
precast concrete pin foundations, which will be installed with hand held tools. The trail will be constructed in place using
small "bobcat"-like tractor and fence post driver. In order to construct the trail, a small hole will be dug with a hand shovel
and the pre-cast concrete diamond-shaped pier (footing) will be set in the hole, with dirt tamped around it. Four steel pins
will be hammered (with an automatic hammer or sledge) into the ground through holes in the diamond pier. All trail
construction work will be contained within the cleared and grubbed 18-foot-wide temporary trail construction corridor.
Approaches to the elevated boardwalk will be paved with concrete or asphalt. The approaches will be approximately 8 feet
wide by 20 feet long, 1,600 square feet at each end, for a total of approximately 3,200 square feet of paved surface.
For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheet GR1; Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank
Instrument; and Attachment C -90% Design Plans.
Planting: During the wet weather season, a density of 3.000 native trees and shrubs per acre will be installed within the
wetland planting area. The riparian and upland areas will be planted with 1,500 stems per acre. Species to be planted
within each planting area (e.g., wetland enhancement area, wetland rehabilitation area, riparian upland enhancement area,
upland buffer habitat enhancement area, and elevated boardwalk trail zone enhancement area) have been selected for the
hydrologic regime specific to that location. Any soils disturbed during planting will be covered with a minimum of 3 inches o
woody mulch to minimize erosion and control weed growth.
To ensure the survival of the plantings at the site, 1-inch-diameter PVC pipes with sprinkler heads will be laid above ground
through planted areas. These pipes will be connected to the existing municipal water system and will operate on a timer
system. This sprinkler network will be left in place until plants are established at the site, probably 2 to 3 years.
For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheet P1; Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank
Instrument; and Attachment C 90% Design Plans.
Unit B
The work elements proposed on Unit B are wetland rehabilitation (31.43 acres), wetland re-establishment (0.12 acres),
riparian upland enhancement (1.49 acres), and protection setback (buffer) establishment (3.45 acres). Unit B
encompasses 36.49 acres, of which approximately 32 acres are existing wetlands. A total of 8. 7 acres of surface area is
proposed to be disturbed (that is, cleared, grubbed, or graded) on Unit B during construction; 0.02 acre of this disturbance
is within existing wetlands on Unit B. A total of 5. 7 acres is proposed to be mowed and sprayed; 4.1 acres of this total
surface area is within existing wetlands.
Site Preparation: Initially, high visibility fencing will be installed around the perimeter of the site and around the perimeter
of all proposed work areas to prevent equipment intrusion into areas where no work is proposed. In addition, silt fencing
will be installed along the entire length of Springbrook Creek and along the perimeter of all proposed clearing, grubbing,
and grading areas to prevent turbid water from entering Springbrook Creek, and silt fencing or a compost berm will be
installed in adjacent areas where no work is proposed.
A temporary construction entrance and tire wash area will be installed at the northeast corner of Unit B within 200 feet of
the OHWM and an existing wetland. The construction entrance will be constructed using geotextile fabric topped with
asphalt that will be removed upon completion of construction of the project. The tire wash water will be discharged to a
Baker tank and then either hauled off site to an approved discharge location or discharged into a sanitary sewer. The
exact method of removal will be determined by the contractor.
In specific areas, existing reed canarygrass will be mowed immediately above the ground surface using small to medium
sized grass-cutting equipment. Mowing will occur in June/July before seeds are formed on the plant stalks. During the dry
periods of both August and September, the cut areas will be sprayed with glyphosate (Rodeo®) herbicide to control below
ground roots and rhizomes. Once the reed canarygrass has been mowed and treated, it will be re-used as mulch.
Himalayan blackberry will be mowed and sprayed in selected areas in preparation for the planting of native woody species.
In other specifically prescribed areas, such as the earthen berm breach locations, the surface vegetation will be cleared
and grubbed to accommodate subsequent grading.
For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheet SP2; Attachment B Draft Final Mitigation Bank
Instrument; and Attachment C -90% Design Plans.
Grading: During the dry weather season, the existing earthen berm along the western edge of Springbrook Creek will be
breached in four locations in order to reconnect Springbrook Creek with its historic floodplain. The breaches, which will be
excavated using mechanical excavators (i.e., backhoe). will measure 20 feet wide and will be approximately 2 to 3 feet
deep to match the existing ground surface elevation of the adjacent wetland. Approximately 583 cubic yards of fill material
will be excavated and removed as part of the berm breaches on Units A and B. Maximum side slope of the breaches will
be 3: 1 (horizontal to vertical). Disturbed soil areas near Springbrook Creek will be protected with a permanent erosion
control blanket to prevent erosion. All excavated material will be removed from the site and disposed of at a WSDOT-
approved upland site. The exact location of the disposal site will be determined by the contractor.
A minimum of two habitat structures (vertical snags, brush piles, and/or large woody debris) per acre and two planting
hummocks per acre will be installed in reed canarygrass removal and treatment areas. A minimum of two habitat
structures per acre will also be installed in a 5-acre area dominated by cattail vegetation in Unit B. Habitat structures and
planting hummocks will be installed using a combination of a mechanical excavator and hand tools.
For more infonmation, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheet GR2; Attachment B Draft Final Mitigation Bank
Instrument; and Attachment C -90% Design Plans.
Planting: During the wet weather season, a density of 3.000 native trees and shrubs per acre will be installed within
wetland planting area. The riparian and upland areas will be planted with 1,500 stems per acre. Species to be planted
within each planting area (e.g., wetland enhancement area, wetland rehabilitation area, riparian upland enhancement area,
and upland buffer habitat enhancement area) have been selected for the hydro logic regime specific to that location. Any
soils disturbed during planting will be covered with a minimum of 3 inches of woody mulch to minimize erosion and control
weed growth.
To ensure the survival of the plantings at the site, 1-inch-diameter PVC pipes with sprinkler heads will be laid above ground
through planted areas. These pipes will be connected to the existing municipal water system and will operate on a timer
system. This sprinkler network will be left in place until plants are established at the site, probably 2 to 3 years.
For more information, see Attachment A -JARPA Drawings, sheet P2; Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank
Instrument; and Attachment C -90% Design Plans.
Unite
The work elements proposed on Unit C are wetland rehabilitation (1.19 acres), wetland re-establishment (9.27 acres),
forested wetland enhancement (23.32 acres), Type I wetland enhancement (4.69 acres), upland habitat enhancement
(7.80 acres), and protection setback (buffer) establishment (1.63 acres). Unit C encompasses 47.9 acres, of which 27.1
acres are existing wetlands. A total of 25.7 acres of surface area is proposed to be disturbed (that is, cleared, grubbed, or
graded) on Unit C during construction; 2.3 acres of this disturbance is within existing wetlands on Unit C. A total of 10.07
acres is proposed to be mowed and sprayed; 6.07 acres of this total surface area is within existing wetlands.
Site Preparation: Initially, high visibility fencing will be installed around the perimeter of all proposed work areas to prevent
equipment intrusion into areas where no work is proposed. In addition, a compost berm will be installed along the
perimeter of all proposed clearing, grubbing, and grading areas to prevent turbid water from entering adjacent areas where
no work is proposed.
A temporary construction entrance and tire wash area will be installed at the east end of Unit C within 200 feet of an
existing wetland. The construction entrance will be constructed using geotextile fabric topped asphalt that will be removed
upon completion of construction of the project. The tire wash water will be discharged to a Baker tank and then either
hauled off site to an approved discharge location or discharged into a sanitary sewer. The exact method of removal will be
determined by the contractor.
In specific areas, existing reed canarygrass will be mowed immediately above the ground surface using small to medium
sized grass-cutting equipment. Mowing will occur in June/July before seeds are formed on the plant stalks. During the dry
periods of both August and September, the cut areas will be sprayed with glyphosate (Rodeo®) herbicide to control below
ground roots and rhizomes. In other specifically prescribed areas, the surface vegetation will be cleared and grubbed to
accommodate subsequent fill removal and grading. Once the reed canarygrass has been mowed and treated, it will be re-
used as mulch. Himalayan blackberry will be mowed and sprayed in selected areas in preparation for the planting of native
woody species. Large woody vegetation removed during clearing will be re-used as habitat structures elsewhere on the
Springbrook Bank site.
For more information, see Attachment A -JAR PA Drawings, sheets SP3 and SP4; Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation
Bank Instrument; and Attachment C -90% Design Plans.
Grading: During the dry weather season, approximately 100.000 cubic yards of fill will be excavated from areas that were
formerly wetlands, but are currently uplands. Excavation depths range from a few inches to 7 feet depending on the
location. The maximum side slope within the excavation area will be 4: 1 (horizontal to vertical). Excavation and removal
will be conducted using mechanical excavators, heavy trucks, and other similar excavation equipment. All excavated
material will be removed from the site and disposed of at a WSDOT-approved upland site. The exact location of the
disposal site will be determined by the contractor. Once the excavation is completed, the area will be rough graded to
provide microtopographic variation. Recently excavated surface areas will receive a minimum of 3 inches of organic
compost material, which will be incorporated into the upper 12 inches of soil.
An adjustable-height weir will be installed at the outflow portion of the excavation area to impound surface hydrology to
ensure wetland soil surface saturation and up to 2 inches of seasonal inundation at a surface elevation of 16.2 feet. The
adjustable-height weir will be constructed in place using reinforced cast-in-place concrete support structure and aluminum
stop logs materials, and a mechanical excavator, a truck, and hand tools.
The existing conveyance ditch located on site will be plugged with approximately 500 cubic yards of clean fill material at
regular spatial intervals to ensure that it no longer conveys water. The height of the ditch plugs will match the existing
surface elevations on either side of the existing ditch. Maximum side slope of the ditch plugs will be 3:1 (horizontal to
vertical). Mechanical excavators and similar equipment will be used to install the ditch plugs.
A minimum of two habitat structures (vertical snags. brush piles, and/or large woody debris) per acre will be installed in
reed canarygrass removal and treatment areas. Habitat structures will be installed using a combination of a mechanical
excavator and hand tools.
For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheets GR3 and GR4; Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation
Bank Instrument; and Attachment C -90% Design Plans.
Planting: During the wet weather season, a density of 3,000 native trees and shrubs per acre will be installed within
wetland planting area, with the exception being that planting density will be 90 trees per acre in the forested wetland under-
planting enhancement area. Species to be planted within most planting areas (e.g., wetland re-establishment area, wetland
rehabilitation area, Type I wetland enhancement area. upland and upland buffer habitat enhancement area, and forested
wetland under-planting enhancement area) have been selected for the hydrologic regime specific to that location. Any
soils disturbed prior to and during planting will be covered with a minimum of 3 inches of woody mulch to minimize erosion
and control weed growth.
To ensure the survival of the plantings at the site. 1-inch-diameter PVC pipes with sprinkler heads will be laid above ground
through planted areas. These pipes will be connected to the existing municipal water system and will operate on a timer
system. This sprinkler network will be left in place until plants are established at the site, probably 2 to 3 years.
For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheets P3 and P4; Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank
Instrument; and Attachment C -90% Design Plans.
UnitD
The work elements proposed on Unit Dare forested wetland enhancement (2.97 acres) and Type II wetland enhancement
(2.63 acres). Unit D encompasses 5.6 acres, all of which are existing wetlands. A total of 0.9 acre of surface area is
proposed to be disturbed (that is, cleared, grubbed, or graded) on Unit D during construction; all 0.9 acre of this
disturbance is within existing wetlands on Unit D. No mowing or spraying will occur in Unit D. Approximately 21 cubic
yards of soil material will be excavated and removed from existing wetlands to install the conveyance pipe.
Site Preparation: Initially, high visibility fencing will be installed around the perimeter of all proposed work areas to prevent
equipment intrusion into areas where no work is proposed. In addition, a compost berm will be installed along the
perimeter of all proposed clearing, grubbing, and grading areas to prevent turbid water from entering adjacent areas where
no work is proposed.
A temporary construction entrance will be installed at the southeast corner of Unit D. The construction entrance will be
constructed using geotextile fabric topped with 4-to 8-inch quarry spalls.
In a specific area, the surface vegetation will be cleared and grubbed to accommodate subsequent installation of a
drainage conveyance pipe. Large woody vegetation removed during clearing will be re-used as habitat structures
elsewhere on the Springbrook Bank site.
For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheet SP5; Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank
Instrument,; and Attachment C 90% Design Plans.
Grading: All grading on Unit D will occur in the dry weather season. To enhance wetlands on site, a drainage conveyance
pipe will be installed on Unit D. This conveyance pipe will convey approximately 45,000 cubic feet of additional surface
hydrology per month to wetlands on the north end of Unit D from an existing stormwater treatment/detention facility located
at the south end of Unit D. The existing stormwater treatment/detention pond currently discharges into the existing city
stormwater conveyance system under SW 43rd Street which eventually discharges directly into Springbrook Creek.
The drainage conveyance pipe will originate downstream of the existing stormwater treatment/detention pond control
structure at the south end of Unit D and be installed under an existing gravel roadbed prior to entering the wetland at the
north end of Unit D. The conveyance pipe will be buried several feet under the wetland surface until daylighting at the
discharge location-approximately 200 feet inside the wetland boundary. Approximately 21 cubic yards of soil material will
be excavated and removed to install the conveyance pipe. A small quarry spall flow dissipation pad will be installed at the
downstream end of the conveyance pipe to prevent erosion.
Excavation depths within the wetland for drainage conveyance pipe installation may be up to several feet, depending on
the location. Excavation, pipe installation, and soil removal will be conducted using mechanical excavators, trucks, and
other similar excavation equipment. All excavated material will be removed from the site and disposed of at a WSDOT-
approved upland site. The exact location of the disposal site will be determined by the contractor.
Habitat brush piles will be installed in this area once the drainage conveyance pipe has been installed. The habitat brush
piles will be installed using a mechanical excavator and hand tools.
For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheet GR5; Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank
Instrument; and Attachment C -90% Design Plans.
Planting: During the wet weather season, a density of 90 trees per acre will be installed within the forested wetland under-
planting enhancement area. Species to be planted within this planting area have been selected for the hydrologic regime
specific to that location. In addition, there will be a wetland planting mix over the newly installed conveyance pipe in the
wetland planting area.
To ensure the survival of the plantings at the site, 1-inch-diameter PVC pipes with sprinkler heads will be laid above ground
through planted areas. These pipes will be connected to the existing municipal water system and will operate on a timer
system. This sprinkler network will be left in place until plants are established at the site, probably 2 to 3 years.
For more information, see Attachment A JAR PA Drawings, sheet P5; Attachment B Draft Final Mitigation Bank
Instrument; and Attachment C 90% Design Plans.
Unit E
The work elements proposed on Unit E are wetland re-establishment (8.37 acres), riparian upland enhancement (4.74
acres), and protection setback (buffer) establishment (2.11 acres). Unit E encompasses 15.22 acres, none of which are
existing wetlands. A total of 13.5 acres of surface area is proposed to be disturbed (that is, cleared, grubbed, or graded)
on Unit E during construction. A total of 1.2 acres is proposed to be mowed and sprayed, none of which is within existing
wetlands.
Site Preparation: Initially, high visibility fencing will be installed around the perimeter of the site and around the perimeter
of all proposed work areas to prevent equipment intrusion into areas where no work is proposed. In addition, silt fencing
will be installed alongside the entire length of Springbrook Creek and along the perimeter of all proposed clearing,
grubbing, and grading areas to prevent turbid water from entering Springbrook Creek and adjacent areas where no work is
proposed.
A temporary construction entrance and tire wash area will be installed at the northwest corner of Unit E. The construction
entrance will be constructed using geotextile fabric topped with asphalt that will be removed upon completion of
construction of the project. The tire wash water will be discharged to a Baker tank and then either hauled off site to an
approved discharge location or discharged into a sanitary sewer. The exact method of removal will be determined by the
contractor.
In most of Unit E, the surface vegetation will be cleared and grubbed to accommodate subsequent fill removal and grading.
In a few selected areas, only invasive and non-native vegetation (i.e., reed canarygrass and Himalayan blackberry) will be
mowed and sprayed to accommodate subsequent native vegetation plantings. Large woody vegetation removed during
clearing will be re-used as habitat structures elsewhere on the Springbrook Bank site.
For more information, see Attachment A JARPA Drawings. sheet SP6; Attachment B Draft Final Mitigation Bank
Instrument; and Attachment C 90% Design Plans.
Grading: During the dry weather season, approximately 160,000 cubic yards of fill will be excavated from areas that were
formerly wetlands, but are currently uplands. Excavation depths range from a few inches to approximately 12 feet
depending on the location. The maximum side slope in the excavation area will be 3:1 (horizontal to vertical). Excavation
and removal will be conducted using mechanical excavators, heavy trucks, and other similar excavation equipment. All
excavated material will be removed from the site and disposed of at a WSDOT-approved upland site. The exact location of
the disposal site will be determined by the contractor.
Once the excavation is completed, the area will be rough graded to provide microtopographic variation. Newly excavated
surface areas will receive a minimum of 3 inches of organic compost material, which will be incorporated into the upper 12
inches of soil. All disturbed soils will be covered with a minimum of 3 inches of woody mulch to deter reed canarygrass
growth and promote native woody plant establishment.
As part of the site excavation, the earthen berm adjacent to Springbrook Creek will be breached in three locations on Unit
E, allowing seasonal flood events from Springbrook Creek to penetrate much of Unit E. The breaches, which will be
excavated using mechanical excavators (i.e., backhoe), will range in measurement from 20 feet wide to nearly 100 feet
wide and approximately 12 feet deep to a ground elevation of approximately 8 feet. The maximum side slope of the
breaches will be 3: 1 (horizontal to vertical). Low-flow channels will be graded into the interior portions of Unit E to allow
fish to migrate out of Unit E to Springbrook Creek once seasonal flood waters recede.
Disturbed soil areas near Springbrook Creek will be protected with quarry spalls to prevent erosion. The quarry spalls will
be located below the OHWM (elevation 13 feet) and be placed at the flat part of the breach-approximately 5 feet landward
of the toe of the slope to an elevation of 8 feet-and will extend up the slope a minimum of 3 feet (to an elevation of 11
feet). The quarry spalls, which consist of 754 cubic yards of 4-inch to 8-inch rock, will be incorporated into the ground
surface and encompass approximately 0.32 acre. Native vegetation, such as willows, will be planted in the quarry spall
areas.
A minimum of two habitat structures (vertical snags and/or large woody debris) per acre will be installed in the wetland re-
establishment area. Habitat structures will be installed using a combination of a mechanical excavator and hand tools.
For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheet GR6; Attachment B Draft Final Mitigation Bank
Instrument; and Attachment C 90% Design Plans.
Planting: During the wet weather season, a density of 3.000 native trees and shrubs per acre will be installed within
wetland planting area, with the exception that planting density will be 90 trees per acre in the upland underplanting
enhancement areas. The riparian and upland areas will be planted with 1,500 stems per acre. Species to be planted
within most planting areas (e.g., wetland re-establishment area, riparian upland enhancement area, and upland buffer
habitat enhancement area) have been selected for the hydro logic regime specific to that location. Any soils disturbed
during planting will be covered with a minimum of 3 inches of woody mulch to minimize erosion and control weed growth.
To ensure the survival of the plantings at the site, 1-inch-diameter PVC pipes with sprinkler heads will be laid above ground
through planted areas. These pipes will be connected to the existing municipal water system and will operate on a timer
system. This sprinkler network will be left in place until plants are established at the site, probably 2 to 3 years.
For more information, see Attachment A-JARPA Drawings, sheet P6; Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank
Instrument; and Attachment C 90% Design Plans.
PREPARATION OF DRAWINGS: See sample drawings and guidance for completing the drawings ONE SET OF ORIGINAL OR GOOD QUALITY REPRODUCIBLE
DRAWINGS MUST BE ATTACHED. NOTE: Applicants are encouraged to submit photographs of the project site, but these DO NOT substitute for drawings. THE CORPS
OF ENGINEERS AND COAST GUARD REQUIRE DRAWINGS ON 8-112 X 11 INCH SHEETS. LARGER DRAWINGS MAY BE REQUIRED BY OTHER AGENCIES.
7b. Describe the purpose of the proposed work and why you want or need to perform it at the site. Please explain any specific needs that
have influenced the design.
The purpose of the Springbrook Bank is to provide compensatory mitigation in advance of unavoidable impacts to wetlands
and other aquatic resources from future WSDOT projects and other City of Renton projects within the service area of the
bank.
The proposed project focuses on improving wetland area and function and riparian functions near Springbrook Creek.
Construction work includes extensive site grading on Units C and E; breaching the earthen berms adjacent to Springbrook
Creek on Units A and B; opening Unit E to fiooding from Springbrook Creek; removing and controlling invasive reed
canarygrass in Units A, B, C, and E; educating the public by placing environmentally educational signage on the
constructed elevated boardwalk trail on Unit A; installing habitat structures; and planting native woody vegetation in all units.
This work will enhance a broad range of ecological functions to improve wetland habitat, water quality, and hydrologic
functions.
7c. Describe the potential impacts to characteristic uses of the water body. These uses may include fish and aquatic life, water quality,
water supply, recreation and aesthetics. Identify proposed actions to avoid, minimize, and mitigate detrimental impacts and provide
proper protection of fish and aquatic life. Identify which guidance documents you have used. Attach a separate sheet if additional
space is needed.
Potential impacts to Springbrook Creek and onsite wetlands, proposed avoidance and minimization measures, and
proposed compensatory mitigation measures are summarized in the following paragraphs. The following attachments
provide detailed information and analysis of impacts to Springbrook Creek, onsite wetlands, and Endangered Species Act
(ESA)-listed species and contain proposed actions to avoid, minimize, and mitigate detrimental impacts:
• Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument
• Attachment D -Biological Assessment
• Attachment E Springbrook Fisheries Review White Paper
Potential Impacts
Fish and Aquatic Life: Temporary riparian area and wetland impacts will occur within Units A, B, and E when riparian and
wetland areas are enhanced by mowing, spraying, clearing. and grubbing invasive vegetation; installing erosion control
measures; and planting or underplanting with native vegetation. Although existing riparian conditions vary, the majority of
these areas on the site are currently moderately to severely degraded. Therefore, many of the functions that riparian
vegetation provides are already altered and will not be substantially affected as compared to existing conditions. Noise
impacts will be greatest during construction along Springbrook Creek; however, this area is already exposed to a high level
of ambient noise (highways, airport, railroad, adjacent road arterial, and commercial/industrial land uses).
The berms that presently separate Springbrook Creek from Units A, B, and E will be breached. In Units A and B, the
creation of hydrologic connections 20 feet wide through the existing berms will reconnect Springbrook Creek to floodplain
wetlands and their functions at stream elevations greater than 12 feet. In Unit E, three sections of the existing berm will be
removed to connect Unit E to Springbrook Creek. Elevations below 11.5 feet will be saturated during at least 5 percent
and inundated during at least 1 percent of the growing season (March 1 through October 31 ). Unit E will be graded such
that all water will directly drain out to Springbrook Creek as floodwaters recede. However, Units A and B will have some
surface areas that will retain water after floodwaters recede. For a detailed discussion on hydrology, refer to Attachment F
-Springbrook Creek Wetland Restoration Memorandum. It is possible that juvenile salmon ids may become stranded in
these lower elevation areas in Units A and B. However, the potential for fish stranding after construction should be less
than under present conditions. For a detailed discussion on fish use and fish stranding, refer to Attachment D Biological
Assessment and Attachment E -Springbrook Fisheries Review White Paper.
Once constructed, the project will result in many positive impacts to fish and aquatic life. The Springbrook Bank will
restore, rehabilitate, enhance, and permanently preserve wetland and riparian areas and upland buffers throughout the
site. Habitat improvements include removal of invasive plant communities and replacement of those communities with
diverse, native, multi-strata vegetation that will provide increased opportunity for food and shelter. Reconnecting
Springbrook Creek to its historic fioodplain will provide wider stream margins with slower velocity waters, which will provide
off-channel refugia habitat for juvenile salmonids and other resident species. Placement of large woody debris and other
special habitat features will provide cover for prey species and fish. Improved groundwater connectivity will increase
groundwater recharge and improve water quality in Springbrook Creek by contributing cooler, cleaner water.
Water Quality: Most units will be cleared, grubbed, graded, and excavated; mowed and sprayed for removal of invasive
species; or have erosion control measures placed. Any of these activities that temporarily disturb soil could result in
erosion and sedimentation. Best management practices (BMPs), conservation measures, and performance standards will
be implemented to minimize the impacts of sedimentation and turbidity.
BMPs, conservation measures, and performance standards will be implemented to avoid, minimize, and control potential
discharges of surface contaminants, including turbidity, into Springbrook Creek and the on-site wetlands.
Water Supply: Two types of changes to surface water supply will occur as a result of the project, both of which are
beneficial to Springbrook Creek and the on-site wetlands. First, the existing earthen berms along the edge of Springbrook
Creek will be breached at multiple locations on Units A, B, and E in order to reconnect Springbrook Creek with its historic
floodplain. Second, to enhance wetland hydrology on Units C and D, a drainage conveyance pipe will be installed on Unit
D. This will also benefit Unit C since Unit D currently drains northward to Unit C. This conveyance pipe will convey
approximately 45,000 cubic feet of additional surface hydrology per month to wetlands on the north end of Unit D from an
existing stormwater treatment/detention facility located at the south end of Unit D. The existing stormwater
treatment/detention pond currently discharges into the existing city stormwater conveyance system under SW 43rd Street,
which eventually discharges directly into Springbrook Creek. For a detailed discussion on surface water supply, refer to
Attachment F -Springbrook Creek Wetland Restoration Memorandum.
Recreation and Aesthetics: The site will be fully vegetated with native trees and shrubs and permanently protected from
development and recreational uses, with the exception of the elevated boardwalk trail in Unit A Shading impacts will be
minimal, if at all, since the boardwalk runs north to south and is 8 feet wide. The elevated boardwalk trail in Unit A will be a
passive recreational use along the boardwalk to be enjoyed by those who use the trail. The trail will be accessible for
pedestrian foot traffic (no bicycle traffic), including people with disabilities, and will connect to a larger, existing regional trail
system-the King County regional Interurban Trail and the King County regional Green River Trail
Avoidance and Minimization Measures
To minimize impacts to fish, aquatic life, and water quality, the following BMPs will be employed. These BMPs will adhere
to the 2006 WSDOT Standard Specifications.
Environmental Compliance
• WSDOT will utilize a commitment tracking system to identify all commitments made during ESA consultation, State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), design, and permitting per WSDOT Environmental Procedures Manual Chapter
490.02. All project commitments will be clearly communicated in the Special Provisions to the contractor, who will in
turn communicate commitments to project office staff and supporting design offices. Commitments will be tracked
throughout the various stages of the project delivery.
• To reduce or eliminate impacts from construction-related pollutant spills, a Spill Prevention, Control, and
Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan and Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) Plan will be prepared for
this project. The SPCC Plan and TESC Plan will be developed and submitted by the contractor to the project
engineer prior to commencing any construction. BMPs will be implemented during project construction to reduce or
eliminate potential sources of hazardous material contamination.
A copy of the SPCC Plan and TESC Plan with any updates will be maintained at the work site by the
contractor.
The SPCC Plan will identify construction planning elements and recognize potential spill sources at the site.
The SPCC Plan will outline responsive actions in the event of a spill or release, and will identify notification
and reporting procedures. The SPCC Plan will also outline contractor management elements, such as
personnel responsibilities, project site security. site inspections, and training.
The SPCC Plan will outline what measures the contractor will take to prevent the release or spread of
hazardous materials either found on site or encountered durin construction but not identified in contract
documents, or any hazardous materials that the contractor stores, uses, or generates on the construction
site during construction activities. These items include, but are not limited to, gasoline, oils, and chemicals.
Hazardous materials are defined in Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 70.105.010 under "hazardous
substance."
Erosion Control
• Prior to the start of construction, all sensitive areas and clearing limits will be marked with high visibility construction
fencing, and erosion control devices will be placed to prevent runoff of sediment into wetlands and streams. The
Contractor will confine construction projects to the minimum area necessary to complete the project as defined by
the flagged clearing limits.
• Impacts on wetlands and streams will be minimized during construction through the use of approved temporary
erosion and sediment control BMPs.
• Impacts to streams will be minimized during work in, over, and adjacent to water through the use of approved BMPs.
• Breaching of the berms will occur during summer low flows to further limit sediment from entering Springbrook Creek
and so that no in-water work will be required in Springbrook Creek.
• Excavation and grading in Unit E will be conducted in the dry prior to breaching the berm along Springbrook Creek.
Staging
• Temporary material storage stockpiles will not be placed in the 100-year floodplain between October 1 and May 1.
Material used within 72 hours of deposition will not be considered a temporary material storage stockpile. All
temporary material storage stockpiles will be protected by appropriate BMPs to prevent sediments from leaving the
stockpiles.
• Units C and E will be used as staging areas prior to being excavated. In addition, the existing roadbed within Unit D
will also be used as a staging area for the project. Additional off-site staging areas may be necessary to complete
the project; however, the locations of these additional off-site staging areas have not been determined. Any off-site
staging area locations will ultimately be determined by the project contractor; however, WSDOT will require the
contractor to locate any additional off-site staging areas more than 300 feet from any wetlands, ditches, flowing or
standing water, or other sensitive areas.
• When practicable, all fueling and maintenance of equipment will occur more than 300 feet from the nearest wetland,
ditches, and flowing or standing water (fueling large cranes, excavators, and drill rigs over 300 feet away may not be
practicable).
Grubbing and Clearing
• Vegetation will only be grubbed from areas undergoing permanent alteration. All areas grubbed for temporary
construction access will be restored when construction is completed.
Herbicide Use
Herbicides will be applied in accordance with the herbicide label by a licensed applicator with an aquatic
endorsement.
Trail Construction
• Treated wood will be inspected before installation to ensure that there are not any superficial deposits of
preservative material on the wood.
• Treated wood will not be stored within the nearest wetland or ditch, or in flowing or standing water, and will remain
covered until used.
• Non-creosote treated wood will be treated using the April 17, 2002 revised Amendment to Best Management
Practices for the Use of Treated Wood in Aquatic Environments; USA Version-Revised July 1996-Western Wood
Preservers Institute. The Western Wood Preserver Institute BMPs for Treated Wood in Aquatic Applications and
amendments can be found at the following link: http//www.wwpinstitute.org/mainpages/thebmpswoodinaquat.shtml.
• In addition, the contractor will treat wood according to the Memorandum of Agreement between Washington
Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) dated August
1995, which specifies the use of treated wood in aquatic environments.
• The elevated boardwalk trail design will include measures, such a.s side rails, to prevent impacts from human
intrusion into vegetated areas of Unit A.
• Fabrication of the trail will not be completed over flowing water.
• Areas adjacent to the elevated boardwalk trail within the temporary boardwalk trail construction corridor will be
replanted with native trees and shrubs.
Debris resultin from construction of the boardwalk trail will be revented from enterin wetland, ditches, or flowin
or standing water through the use of tarps or other containment devices, to the greatest extent possible.
Lighting
• Within 300 feet of waters known to contain ESA-listed fish life, all temporary project lighting will be minimized
between sunset and sunrise from November 1 to January 15, and from March 15 to May 15.
No temporary project light, including mobile units, will shine directly on any waters known to contain ESA-listed fish
outside of the in-water work window time periods.
Fish and Wildlife
• To prevent fish stranding, low-flow connecting channels were incorporated into the design of Unit E. Also, berm
breach elevations on Unit E extend below the OHWM of Springbrook Creek. Earthen berm breach elevations on
Units A and B match adjacent wetland elevations and are at the OHWM of Springbrook Creek.
• All berm breaching associated with Springbrook Creek will occur during the WDFW-prescribed work window of June
15 through September 30.
• The contractor will provide advance notification to WDFW and Ecology before commencing work in an
environmentally sensitive area, in accordance with permit conditions.
• Construction equipment will not enter any water body without authorization from WDFW. Though the berm breaches
extend below the OHWM of Springbrook Creek, construction equipment will not enter Springbrook Creek below the
wetted perimeter and all berm breach excavation work will be done during summer low creek-flow periods.
• Any noise impacts to fish will be minimized by limiting the timeframe associated with breaching of the berms next to
Springbrook Creek to WDFWs in-water work window, when the fewest number of fish are expected to be present.
• Turbidity levels will not exceed maximums specified in the Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State
of Washington (Chapter 173-201A Washington Administrative Code [WAC]).
Bank Protection
• For Units A, B, and E, living plant material and large woody debris will be incorporated into the bank protection
designs, or as by an approved planting plan.
Restoration and Revegetation
• A 40-foot-wide protection setback area (buffer) will be established between the proposed habitat and incompatible
land uses along the site perimeter.
• Riparian vegetation will be replanted with species native to the region, or as by an approved planting plan.
• Disturbed areas will be replanted with native plant species, or as by an approved planting plan.
Miscellaneous
• All excess excavated material will be removed and placed in WSDOT-approved upland locations where it cannot
enter waters of the state as per the contract documents.
• All washwater associated with construction will be contained to prevent runoff into adjacent wetlands and
Springbrook Creek as per the contract documents.
Construction Monitoring
• WSDOT inspectors will monitor site construction to ensure work is completed according to site plan sheets and
permit conditions.
• Qualified inspectors will oversee construction to ensure compliance with contract language, special provisions, and
all existing WSDOT environmental procedures.
• A preconstruction meeting, as well as weekly progress meetings, will be held between the contractor and WSDOT to
review all contract requirements.
• Site elevations will be surveyed in Units A, B, C, and E during construction to ensure excavated elevations are as
shown on the site grading plan.
• Woody habitat structures and plant material will be inspected, properly stored, and installed by a qualified project
engineer or representative.
Long-term Maintenance/Compliance
• WSDOT and the City of Renton will provide assurance that all long-term compliance expectations are communicated
to the responsible parties.
• The site will be maintained for a period of 10 years or until performance standards are met, whichever occurs later.
Maintenance activities include, but are not limited to, weed control, trash removal, vandalism repair, and structure
and/or sianaae maintenance.
• Long-term maintenance (Year 10 through Year 20) will be conducted by the City of Renton to ensure that functional
benefits of the Springbrook Bank are not degraded.
• All structures and facilities within Springbrook Bank. including fences, the elevated boardwalk, the stormwater
diversion pipe and structure, and the stop-log weir, shall be properly maintained in perpetuity or for as long as each
is needed to accomplish the goals of Springbrook Bank.
• After the 20-year period ends, the City of Renton will continue to manage the site by fulfilling landowner obligations
defined in the Conservation Easement to maintain the ecological functions on the site. These obligations include
prohibiting activities that may convert the bank site into vacant land such as burning, dumping, or harvesting wood.
Landowner obligations also include noxious weed control, emergency control of pests, and maintaining fences to
restrict human access.
Compensatory Mitigation
• The construction of the elevated boardwalk trail on Unit A, located within the 2.66-acre trail zone, will be mitigated by
the minimized trail footprint and the wetland rehabilitation work that will occur within the 2.66-acre trail zone area,
minus the 8-foot-wide by 1,365-foot-long (or approximately 0.25 acre) boardwalk trail footprint itself. In order for the
wetland rehabilitation work to adequately mitigate for placement of the elevated boardwalk trail, the entire 2.66-acre
trail zone will not generate any mitigation bank credits.
• All other impacts are considered temporary construction impacts and are essentially self-mitigated by the project.
However, based on coordination with the Muckleshoot Tribe, additional large woody debris habitat structures have
been incorporated into the Unit E design to offset any potential impacts from boardwalk trail construction on Unit A.
See Attachment B Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument for performance standards, a planting plan that incorporates
native vegetation, and construction monitoring.
7d. For in water construction work, will your project be in compliance with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity
WAC 173.201A-110? rxT YES O NO (See USEFUL DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS)
8. Will the project be constructed in stages? YES D NO 0
Proposed starting date: Fall 2006
Estimated duration of activity: Approximately 24 months
Project work will begin during the fall of 2006 and extend through 2008, taking approximately 24 months.
Site preparation activities, such as installation of erosion control measures, will occur during seasonally dry periods in the fall
of 2006 or winter or spring of 2007. Site clearing, grubbing, grading, habitat structure installation, elevated boardwalk trail
foundation construction, and Units A and B berm breaches will occur during seasonally dry weather periods in the late spring,
summer, and early fall of 2007. Berm breaches on Unit E will occur during seasonally dry weather periods in the late spring
or summer of 2008. Vegetation planting activities will occur during seasonally wet weather periods in the late fall and winter
of 2007, and in summer or fall of 2008.
9. Check if any temporary or permanent structures will be placed: N/A
D Waterward of the ordinary high water mark or line for fresh or tidal waters AND/OR
D Waterward of the mean higher high water for tidal waters?
10. Will fill material (rock, fill, bulkhead, or other material) be placed: Yes, quarry spalls will be placed waterward of the OHWM
during summer low flow on Unit E to prevent erosion.
0 Waterward of the ordinary high water mark or line for fresh waters?
If YES, VOLUME (cubic yards) 754 i AREA0.32 (acres)
D Waterward of the mean higher high water for tidal waters?
If YES, VOLUME (cubic yards) / AREA (acres)
11. Will material be placed in wetlands? 0 YES D NO
If YES: Fill material will be placed for habitat planting hummocks on Units A and B; soil ditch plugs and the weir
structure on Unit C; and the quarry spalls on Unit D. Table 1 provides a breakdown of these fill amounts for each
unit. See Attachment A JARPA Drawings for details.
Table 1
Volume and Area of Fill in Wetlands
i Volume Area
Unit (cubic yards) (acre)
Unit A 87 03 0.02
Unit B 61.02 . 0.03
Unit C 528 0.26
-...... -
Unit D 8 0.002
As part of the mitigation treatment throughout the bank. woody mulch will be spread over approximately 20 acres to
deter weeds. Table 2 provides a breakdown of mulch that will placed in existing wetlands for each unit.
Table 2
Volume and Area of Mulch in Wetlands
Volume Area
Unit (cubic yards) (acre)
Unit A 3,533 8.8
Unit B 2.159 5.4
············-·-·····-·-·····
UnitC 2,494 6.2
A. Impacted area in acres: Approximately 20. 71 acres
B. Has a delineation been completed? If YES, please submit with application. 0 YES D NO
See Attachment G Wetland Delineation Report
C. Has a wetland report been prepared? If YES, please submit with application 0 YES D NO
See Attachment B -Draft Final Mitigation Bank Instrument
D. Type and composition of fill material (e.g., sand, etc.) See answers to 11 E, 11 F, and 13 below.
E. Material source: Clean soils excavated elsewhere on site or to be determined by contractor.
F. List all soil series (type of soil) located at the project site, and indicate if they are on the county's list of hydric soils. Soils
information can be obtained from the natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS).
Snohomish silt loam, Woodinville silt loam, Puyallup fine sandy loam, and Puget silty clay loam. The Puget,
Snohomish, and Woodinville series are listed as hydric soils.
G. WILL PROPOSED ACTIVITY CAUSE FLOODING OR DRAINING OF WETLANDS? 0 YES O NO
The Springbrook Bank project proposes to supplement existing hydrology to Unit D (which will eventually drain to
If YES, IMPACTED AREA IS QACRES OF DRAINED WETLANDS.
NOTE: If your project wm impact greater than 1/z of an acre of wetland, submit a mitigation plan to the Corps and Ecology for approval along with the JARPA form.
NOTE: A 401 water quality certification will be required from Ecology in addition to an approved mitigation plan if your project impacts wetlands that are: a) greater than X acre in si
orb) tidal wetlands or wetlands adjacent to tidal water. Please submit the JARPA fonn and mit'Jation plan to Ecology for an individual 401 certification tf a) orb) applies.
12. Stormwater Compliance for Nationwide Permits Only: This proJect is (or will be) designed to meet ecology's most current
stormwater manual, or an Ecology approved local stormwater manual. 0 YES D NO
If YES -Which manual will your project be designed to meet? WSDOT March 2004 Highway Runoff Manual
If NO -For clean water act Section 401 and 404 permits only -Please submit to Ecology for approval, along with this JARPA
application, documentation that demonstrates the stormwater runoff from your project or activity will comply with the water quality
standards, WAC 173.201(A)
13. Will excavation or dredging be required in water or wetlands? 0 YES (Please see Tables 3 and 4 for details) D NO
If YES
Table 3
Volume and Area of Excavation within OHWM
Volume Area
Unit (cubic yards) (acre)
Unit E 570 0.14
Table 4
Volume and Area of Excavation in Existing Wetlands
Volume Area
Unit (cubic yards) (acre)
Unit A 24.5 0.06 -·-· ···········-·-···---··--~---
Unit B 3.9 0.03
...•.
Unit C . 7,917 1.75
Unit D 21 0.09
A Volume: Within OHWM, aggroximately 570 (cubic )lards/ area O 14 (acre]
Within existing wetlands aggroximatel)l 7 966.4 (cubic )lards) /area 1.93 (acre]
B. Composition of material to be removed: Old fill material grimaril)l glacial till, silt, and sand
C. Disposal site for excavated material: WSDOT-aggroved ugland disgosal site to be determined by contractor
D. Method of dredging: Mechanical excavator
14. Has the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) been completed [TI YES D NO
SEPA Lead Agency: WSDOT
SEPA Decision: DNS, MONS, EIS, Adoption, Exemption DNS Decision Date (end of comment period) January 10, 2006
SUBMIT A COPY OF YOUR SEPA DECISION LETTER TO WDFW AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE APPLICATION
Please see Attachment H SEPA Decision Letter and Notice of Action Taken.
15. List other Applications, approvals or certifications from other federal, state or local agencies for any structures, construction
discharges or other activities described in the application (i.e. preliminary plat approval, health district approval, building permit,
SEPA review, federal energy regulatory commission license (FERG), Forest practices application, etc.). Also, indicate whether
work has been completed and indicate all existing work on drawings. NOTE: For use with Corps Nationwide Permits, identify
whether your project has or will need an NPDES permit for discharging wastewater and/or stormwater.
TYPE OF APPROVAL ISSUING AGENCY IDENTIFICATION NO DATE OF APPLICATION DATE APPROVED COMPLETE
D'
Section 402 NPDES Permit Ecology No
CZMA Consistency Determination No
Letter (form attached as Attachment I) Ecology
ESA Concurrence Letter USFWS No
ESA Concurrence Letter NMFS No
Shoreline Substantial Development City of Renton No
Section 106 Concurrence Letter Log: 110805-January 4, Yes
(attached as Attachment J) DAHP 05-FHWA 2006
16. Has any agency denied approval for the activity you're applying for or for any activity directly related to the activity described
herein?
D YES 0 NO
If YES, explain:
ECY 070-15 (Rev. 11/04) JAR PA Contact the State of Washington Office of Regulatory Assistance for latest version or call 360/407-7037 or 800/917-0043
SECTION B -Use for Shoreline and Corps of Engineers permits only:
17a. Total cost of project. This means the fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc.
$7.5 to $8.5 million
17b. If a project or any portion of a project receives funding from a federal agency, that agency is responsible for ESA consultation. Please
indicate if you will receive federal funds and what federal agency is providing those funds. See instructions for information on ESA.*
FEDERAL FUNDING D YES 0 NO If YES, please list the federal agency.
18. Local government with jurisdiction: City of Renton
19. For Corps, Coast Guard and DNR penmits, provide names, addresses and telephone numbers of adjoining property owners, lessees,
etc. Please note: Shoreline Management Compliance may require additional notice -consult your local government.
See Attachment K -List of Adjacent Property Owners for a map and full list of adjacent property owners.
-----
SECTION C -This section MUST be comoleted for anv oermit covered bv this ann/ication
20. Application is hereby made for a penmit or penmits to authorize the activities described herein. I certify that I am familiar with the
information contained in this application, and that to the best of my knowledge and belief, such information is true, complete, and
accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the proposed activities. I hereby grant to the agencies to which
this application is made, the right to enter the above-described location to inspect the proposed, in-progress or completed work. I
agree to start work ONLY after all necessary permits have been received.
DATE
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
DATE
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED AGENT
I HEREBY DESIGNATE TO ACT AS MY AGENT IN MATIERS RELATED TO THIS APPLICATION FOR
PERMIT($). I UNDERSTAND THAT IF A FEDERAL PERMIT IS ISSUED, I MUST SIGN THE PERMIT.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER (EXCEPT PUBLIC ENTITY LANDOWNERS, E.G. DNR)
THIS APPL/CAT/ON MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND THE AGENT, IF AN AUTHORIZED AGENT IS DESIGNATED.
18 U.S.C §1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly
falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact or makes any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or
representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or
entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both.
COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL
A. Nature of the existing shoreline. (Describe type of shoreline, such as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, marsh, bog, swamp, flood
plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as accretion, erosion, high bank, low bank, or dike; material such as sand, gravel, mud, clay,
rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any)
8, In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will exceed a height of thirty-five feet above the average grade level,
indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view:
C. If the application involves a conditional use or variance, set forth in full that portion of the master program which provides that the
proposed use may be a conditional use, or, in the case of a variance, from which the variance is being sought:
These Agencies are Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action employers.
For special accommodation needs. please contact the appropriate agency In the instructions
ECY 070-15 (Rev. 11 /04) JARPA Contact the State of Washington Office of Regulatory Assistance for latest version or call 360/407-7037 or 800/917-00
Printed: 02-21-2006
Payment Made:
:ITY OF RENTON
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Land Use Actions
RECEIPT
Permit#: LUAOS-017
Receipt Number:
DEVFLop ?, l;fENJ p
,/Ty OF Ai::,/;AN~ii,'vG -~,v10t'\1
FEB 2 1 2006
RECEIVED
R0600886
Total Payment:
02/21/2006 04:08 PM
1,000.00 Payee: ANCHOR ENVIRONMENTAL
Current Payment Made to the Following Items:
Trans Account Code Description Amount
---------------------------------------------·-------------------------
5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 1,000.00
Payments made for this receipt
Trans Method Description Amount
Payment Check 19761 1,000.00
Account Balances
Trans Account Code Description Balance Due
3 021
5006
5007
5008
5009
5010
50ll
5012
5013
5014
5015
5016
5017
5018
5019
5020
5021
5022
5024
5036
5909
5941
5954
5955
5998
303.000.00.345.85
000.345.81.00.0002
000.345.81.00.0003
000.345.81.00.0004
000.345.81.00.0006
000.345.81.00.0007
000.345.81.00.0008
000.345.81.00.0009
000.345.81.00.0010
000.345.81.00.0011
000.345.81.00.0012
000.345.81.00.0013
000.345.81.00.0014
000.345.81.00.0015
000.345.81.00.0016
000.345.81.00.0017
000.345.81.00.0018
000.345.81.00.0019
000.345.81.00.0024
000.345.81.00.0005
000.341.60.00.0024
000.341.50.00.0000
604.237.00.00.0000
000.05.519.90.42.l
000.231.70.00.0000
Park Mitigation Fee
Annexation Fees
Appeals/Waivers
Binding Site/Short Plat
Conditional Use Fees
Environmental Review
Prelirn/Tentative Plat
Final Plat
PUD
Grading & Filling Fees
Lot Line Adjustment
Mobile Home Parks
Rezone
Routine Vegetation Mgmt
Shoreline Subst Dev
Site Plan Approval
Temp Use or Fence Review
variance Fees
Conditional Approval Fee
Comprehensive Plan Amend
Booklets/EIS/Copies
Maps (Taxable)
Special Deposits
Postage
Tax
Remaining Balance Due: $0.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00