Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-06-173_Report 1c:, rn c-J ,:::,0 SE2545A KENNYDALE / WSDOT NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP s.s~ 1 1 SCALE: 1· • 100 .,. 0 50' 100' 200' - ------- D ,. ' . Height CELLIO Site ID Site Address (ft) Type HILANDPK SE02507A 2806 NE Sunset Blvd, Renton, WA 43 Monopole HIRENTON SE02505C 3410 N.E. 12th St., Renton, WA 121 Watertank RENTONDT SE02503A 200 Mill Avenue S., Renton, WA 110 Rooftop OLYAVE SE04602A NE 7th & Re dmond Ave NE, Renton, WA 51 Uti lity Lattice T owe MAYCRE EK SE02502D 8931 124th Ave SE, Newcastle, WA 57 Utility Lattice Towe PRESPARK SE04800B 475 Union Ave. N.E., Renton, WA 82 Utility Wooden Po le SCLRENTN SE02509A 3629 NE 19th St., Renton, WA 60 Utility Lattice Towe ANDERSON SE02504D 919 Hou se r Way N., Renton, WA 124 Monopole ARCO SE02540B 2900 N.E. 30th St., Renton , WA 63 Mon opole • ') ; ; • ' I ¢~""',...('\I ,... ~ o,;, ~ 0 I I I I .... ' 0 0 0 0 0 ............ - ~"T..-NO ~co.:-,¢,... I I I~~ ' ' • • <•« • -- ..., T-Mobile USA Coverage AFTER SE02545 Kennydale D Indoor Coverage D In Ca r Coverage • Poor/Outdoor Coverage D No Coverage ~ Ex isting Site a Proposed Site r., KENNYDALE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON, WA 98065 T;' "1~/ 19807 NORTH CR EEK PKWY N BOTHELL. WA 98011 OFFICE (4 25 ) 398-7600 KENNYDALE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASHI NGTON BLVDN RENTON, WA 98065 EXISTI NG #1 FROM INTERSECTION OF MEADOW AVE N & N 24TH ST LOOKING SO UTH 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 9801 1 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 KENNYDALE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVDN RENTON , WA 98065 PROPOSED #1 FROM INTERSECTION OF MEADOW AVE N & N 24TH ST LOOKING SOUTH • 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA98011 OFFICE (42 5 ) 398-7600 KENNY DALE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON , WA 98065 EXI STING#2 FROM EAST SIDE OF 405 FRE EWAY LOOKING SOUTH-WEST • 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFF ICE (4 2 5 ) 398-7600 KENNYDALE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVDN RENTON , WA 98065 PROP0SED#2 FROM EAST S IDE OF 4 05 FREEWAY LOOKING SOUTH-WEST --W'.PNL.&t _______ ::a-~-• --- 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 9801 1 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 KENNYDALE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON , WA 98065 EX1STI NG#3 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 KENNYDALE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVDN RENTON, WA 98065 PROP0SED#3 T 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 9801 1 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 View Area M, ' ' ' I ·' ,: t, z § \ i N 24TH Sf '[ I I ·I Data use subject to licen se. © 2004 Delorme. Topo USA® 5.0. www.delorme.com \ -~ \ g ~ ~ z \ \ \ ,; Topo USA® 5.0 E2545 Kennydale l ' 11' * Id \. 'I 11 \ I I ' 'I\\ \ '· 1 \\ \ I 11 \ II t i ' ~ \ I n ' I\ 1\ \ \\I 11\ \ I \ \ ii\\' \ I I ' I; I \ 'I I \ I ' \ I I ' I I \~ I I I t\ ',\ \I I l MN {0 O'C) I Scale 1 : 4,400 I':= ==="E"~"!":""===""~,,~.,fl"°~.-= .. ="':._,..,! 1" = 366 .7 ft Data Zoom 15-7 -- Yl~INITY MAP * •'""" ;.\ \ l ' • "'''"" "'''l i ; ' ,.,_,~,N t ~ • ·Mobile· KENNYDALE / WSDOT SOUTH OF AND ADJ TO 2219 MEADOW AVE N RENTON, WA 98065 SITE NUMBER: SE2545A LATITUDE 47° 30' 41.9" N LONGITUDE 122° 11' 55.6" W PROJECT TEAM i 1••W• ! ! rn,o.;;;, i ''"'""' ' "'"""' ·""' "'""'""" "~'""'" ,,,...,.,,_,,e .. ve;c OHONE•Jro-,O~,C,:,O TESCS. .. NSclC'~ "'"''"""''"."'""'' T,YQll,c( t'.IO<,NO,,"HCR<"°"''rn '°'""'·'"'""'' , a T>•O>•~S. PC """''''"' w,.,,,, ""'"''"""'-"'"' PROJECT INFORMATION "'"IS""'""" .-c as,--,<1cJEO COUIPMElf"' ""'""'-'-"' us,.o,us,,.,"°"""'"'°"u,t<0u,c•s,o,,,.,.s,aa'1,. "'-"'''"'o,eac•"o'""""'""''"'"""""''"" rMoe,c,ceot,,,,sr .. ·t,,sTl'L,,HcNe,oo,...,"r"c",,.., ,i ,L " seev,c.,o ON<Y a,c MOf!ILHY,uW,.,S AsO Tl<F 'hOOK lc<SOCIA ITO W'1l! '"" £001PM"ll CAl,,OT •• PEs,01u.1ED OY >W<DIC,,.OPfD ""'°"' TH<S FAC~IT'f ~-.LOE ,REQLeNTED O,,,< ,,se'fnct ... H>C>NSel 'Ol<RtF>!H>'<JHPO,eS .C<SUANO ,u,,,,..caw,oec,s"'"''~s,: " o;·ec,u"" scc;.o,.,, """·'"'''"c"n~,,me-,so~,""'C' •-~OB c< "''"'C""aC[ CREW fONE ececo•1Wll.L IW([ A' ,,,s,o,o,,,,._.,e,e•c),TH,·c~,HOIJl>ees,e,e PROJECT DESCRIPTION fi[~ffE!'t~1~t~¥E;f;~}~E~~,',,"'' ZONING INFORMATION DRAWIN_g_ INDEX 't "''""" f WIPELE>S,M:lll!IES "C '"""°"""'""""vs,su,oc, """'"'"""'''"'"' .l'' • \·•.{ ___!.··1: DRIVING DIRECTIONS 1 MEaG[ C<'<TOl<:JO S v" ™' R""" CN '"' _.,. TOYWo.aO REN"CN ,., """ , -,..,Em ,·c·"""'o,·e»•H3T "" "' '"""""'""'""'~"'""' ""·" '""""""°"'~'""""'"''""-'' ,-on,H:C-C"10~2<TI<S.01•'LCC ' "" '"'"'·"' ·o co C<'<"O M'-"' H ' 'M,ce, l!OONLEFT()l<lC,S><T«<T"11M1Le.S , N ><T> STOECOMES •e.\OOV.-.VE N •C 1 MILES ocs·,.,.c, ""M""' ,_,~<"IAfF"R.Wet""e:.1MIHlllCS • ~{f~fff=i: '""''"" CODE COMPLIANCE APPROVALS :;~,~~~1'.';..., ::O~~;:,~(,:,:';.~~c'u~""';::,";'.;'.:;~~~RG':'--"H~:"o'::_~1;~~0,N , Muo,.• ~• I COf\FSMAJ,OmO.,."H,O()C,..,.C<,VeANl,JC,AL•-,S n,eN(S'N"' D•'E '~"'HYl'I."""""'"" NO"HINON,!l<ESEPLAssisrn!!-'w,ST,ucr<omeEaMI" LEGAL DESCRIPTION ,em .. -,.,,'"" woos ,o· OONFOR\alC. TO, ..... COOES =~~:,:t21E'' lmimf~li~~~!'~l~~~i "=•><CO><s,cccsscescc~u, ~:.:;'"""' W.TIONAIFlJFlc.ASC.OOF[PRO,_INSTALIA"IOsS ~'1;:~.:·~~s~:~:'ED PE! .. <JlEUM GA3 COOE lFSOFME i;i:.';:;,'~';~,'~~'.::'.a'c~,' §;~~t~E{W~=t1~~J~' NFPA 1C1 -LIFE '-"en'COOE I CALL l V.ORKlHG DAYS BEFORE l:JU DIG M UIIL111ES 1 ~H~?;~~u:~~~~;0~CENITR (:U,MT,NU,Of<_WA '""'"' '' ~M•-ms '~'-"' '"~ "-"•<•-cc:: . .::~~:-;;-,~-:S ,~•'• "'"', _, >~>rn·,-M,, ••'·'•·•• ~··Mobile· ,_, NORT>ICOUI< .....,.,. N oont£1.L.wuea'1 -~(4UJ_,_ PROJl!CT INFORMATION: I KENNYDALE / WSDOT SE2545A $OVT1t .. APJ T0 2ll19 lollL\DOW AVI! N IU!NTOtl,WA- [IIHUED ~~~LDING PERMIT 11 IIDISION HISTl;HIY1 !6'~'"''°"'~•~0 & ""'-'""°"'- & PL.NS PR~P6RED BY I B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851·1106 [ DRAWN BY, =CHI!. BY1=APPY, BY,-, I __ ~.._ __ 8,1T ..... I ··-·-···---- {~:f;;-"l \;~,_,;,_-;;-~·~,"<(/ ··t~"/,':~:;;.· ~ [1','..:.·:·:,,.,,.,.,,., ... ~,,.,.,,. 11 .or.or,oc,u,.c.,srH"""""°"""'""' .OLJIPMCN" IN A CFSCCDCOOf'<'lC.KO DRAWIN"'"'"""wa ... -- llMCSC" ~::-~.--, .. ,,~ ... " .. ~,,::·-· ......... "" I ~:§J~tit~~~~i~~ ~OMW"°':=J ~oMwom,T • 1 11 • Q) :OH 0 1!1 ~ 1·1 . I· ' i I H,i . \!EAD0WAVEN II I I I / / // / / < / 'f-,--· . 0 ' ' ' I ' L, '· ', I • • I • I • '------''---------- ,_ - I z ' j ' ~ I ~ Iii ' ... ~~ ' f, I !I,! ~g o,, ,J ' ' ~ I I rn·:,m,nc,rn,ccoooo,,n,rnsc I coccoc,,.no,~.onu""""'"' \\ ~'-,, ; ··-111111111mm1 I i lilllDlllllll, ' ' J.,,/1• T ,. ----,-' ,\ m1nm11M-..;:::+ -· · · \ [ I :: ; \ ·1 1111111111i11111111111il11111111iill!llllllll!!II .. .l_ 11111Blmllllll11111MI ~---1-1- ,111111' i. .: \=." -~-1 ' · ---· r: =l: =-: 1: , --"1 ----------i t ·ii ".::i6r I • : l,~--J • I --I ; I l l~ ..•. ::t:'1.111ro:fJi - 1 I -~ , [I -~ I " -._i--~--,---· I I • -• / ~:=--,. _ iir.r,'l:'ll~Jy I Dy ... ' I X I I ' ····--., ' .... ~I I ' I ' ' _ / ·;r-----~tMrllill-WN~N~ /· \: / ,0__; ~lllllllllnffl I ·--,. I • • .,,. •• ' ' ' I : • : '. '-. ''"". : I ~lliffi~-~; --..... ·--., ; J : ~ -,-,~·-·~ I •. • --· --· l L __ ,, I • ;;~t,~.~D SITE PLAN IIHDIIIIIIIUIBI I' <<0,<>nu,":'1°' 'l ~··Mobile· tND7 NDlffllClttllC l'l<WY N MmOO<l.,W,t, ... 11 om,;:.~1-,..., L PRl;)J~CT INl'OlllllATION. = I KENNYDALE / WSDOT SE2545A SOUTH & All.I TO 2218 IHADCIW AVE N AENTON,WAINICNl!I [IIHUED~~R:LDING PERMIT IIE\11910N HIIJTORY1 ~~~~~~ ... ...= _,,_,,.,"". 6 "'"-~\~" ... 6, ·,,,,_ moo••• •• •• 16• -,_.,,,.,e [ '"" :~·:::::MAS, P.E. I 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 J 206-851·1106 --· ---------- [·~-n,=,""·""··--·"''u I JL IUT ... I LIG~N!IUR~ ....... /1.'~'.~(\ ~-... ~: \}<,,_;;~;,,,·,/'••"' .. ~~\.~.,:.•.,. ['"'""'~' , ,,,,.,.,. ,rn,.se,c,~ "'''"'"' I] LOC,,.TECo,,,~ACLs·mu,::so•mEWllH8TS mu,.,.,,.-,,. '['IC[DCOIJPC'JND l1·····~·-~·-·, 1 oc -.OT"'"-'""'""""' CooT'-"'TOR """' vrnr. "--'-='""' """ """""''' """'~ •Noc..s;,o,s,cceaEV>OusossuES~""5DR',.,.., '"'""'"'"""""''""""""""''""'"' '°'"°"' Cle+. C ON' A><F D IN "HI> SET OF OOCI, \IF k TS IS ""°""IETAP>a<>«'URE AN'USE°"OiSC.OScaE 011iEPTl!ASW•ICCIS,eL'.TEDf0NA\IEDCLIEN013 '"'-'«eROHlbl"SU IMIAWINII TTTU; ENLARGED rE PLAN ----- 1511,= ~ !ur .I: ' -' ~ ~ ' ' ' ' ' ! -~-~ C ! N -; cc· . ~ . E ~ • i ;; : • • I I . ! 1 J / ,'-" 1 -JI'-------' ~ ,. ------/ , , I -,, __, .~ ~ lir 1111 =Ii ) I ~··Mobile· 1N07 IKllmOCaUJ< NWY • tonllU., WA -11 on1c•1_1_,_ PRl;)JfCT INFORMATION; I KENNYDALE / WSDOT SE2545A SOUTH & ADJ~ Ht• Ill~ AYI! N RENTON,WA118D&S -II 1~11 I~ I I J [IIHUEO:~·LDING PERMIT 11 "!'"':.':.'u'::.:..,_ ~ -=· I ' I _J r :.'i'i:,~;~.,:-~:,::.::,= "'""''"' . .,,,,. CAl!IHHPcl,•s/T'/,, \ ··~ \ ~ _1_ L .. ~·· r••~HPL°'"Hrr,'P, JI, @ ~~ EQUIPMENT PLINTH DETAIL I IT] 11 c;::i -, I /ill!IJii1, -~- ,-! '-, EQUIPME ·-~ -!-,cc j, _"_J ,,,~~'·"':'~ NT CABINET ELEVATION -, / 11 ~""_J-''""' 'Jl-.Sll<C .. IHFT . - 1 J > I ' "'--&.,,,,,,. '"'""-& ,,,_ ,mo• 6 jM->005 uF'O•'l:DSUf<."(• '"""''"'"' 11F " """' ,.,~.l-<k ,u '''' '' ~'" ['"~" ""'"" '" EQUIPMENT WEIGHT B. J. THOMAS, P.E. (1) NOKIA ULTRASITE BTS 740 LBS 7607 BOTH AVE NE I (11 NOKIA UL TRASITE= BTS 740 LBS MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 I (1) PURCELL CABINET: 2642 LBS 206-B51·1106 (1) NOKIA FLEXI UMTS. 132.3 LBS TOTAL EQUIPMENT WEIGHT: 4254.3 LBS I [DRAWN av, --ctt11.. BYt~.APPY. BY•n r '''"""" '°""'"'"'"" AFOUI .. OMIHl~a- ,SFf>/ICCCC.~S<l<C, ------ I J~ 8JT -I IUOENSUR!: . rr~~1:\ . A . \;;,,;:;l'.}~:~f/ •·····• [I::,::::::,,,,,.,,«~·"""-11 ·"'"''''"''' ""' """" "": 'CU"''""' '"'FFSCFOOOMF'<' .. NO ll'.:'.:',:::.:::~:=.~~c,oo,,·.··. """I ~~l~i[f{{ffi~~~:: ,,.,:nv••oe,oneo ORAWINCI Tm.I!; BTS EQUIPMENT DETAILS -WINO NUMRR1 .fi'\ SERVICE CLEARANCE PLAN \cV "' A-3 T iii .,.,6.D I L' !JI~~':·., ~ . Jfl:;;;;;;;;:!: I~ Y--111· II l g . ' ~I i : ~ " z 0 " " ; •:) • • ca: """"""""'"" ~ONCRCTC rCOTING ' I I I ' . --~ ~ "' dALV"l/eOS'.LIGHT ---I--,ooA .. PFLFCTRIGAl *~~1~oou, 1 1 srn,crel'.seL -"'"°'M"ee,ec, tin RSCePISCLe ' / • HU' H(. UNIS·su, ~-:::;'~~:~~atov,nco--\ ·e,c-""' .,.::<, --~~-.,,o,c,.,. TEL00 OE°""'CMIUMSU°'r ·--..._ __ TFtsN$1eNt VOL fA0£ SLIR(;>S.JPPRFSSes ~OBILE H-FRAME v:·'..J ·-' l,<~>4"0"R["Cl<CROM! WJ MC,HnQGM s...,,; -roonNGW,1CCCSCWH '" CHA'!OELOW'OR31ZE•OE>T< ,, ... ,,.::, .. ,~:;.;···~:;;;:-'·::~---··-· I '.'·~~iiJ~0f ;~;~;;::·· I '.;;'~~ I ''l!flf'j:::::::iJm I· ,cc """"'" ; ~:i:::""'"'~:~,u,, "'"'"' ':~~~;~ • :• ' l?<>,Je ,, ' ··-~ :'.::~'t:~·~,!~',,' {I:) SITE FENCE DETAIL ':_",/ H.T.S NOTICE <<1>) -~ __..,.,. ,~~-- '"'' ~' · '•,-<~ :::.::==-==.:: ·-~-------··· ----------- IN CASE OF AN EMEAOENC' ~~ 1-888-662-4662 ........ ~ ........... ~ rWSDQT NOTICE "' ............ ._""_,'"' •M--.. ·-~~ .-....._-.~, ... ----·-·- (3\ SITE SIGNAGE DETAIL \!::_),-, ------ '""'' ,. '"'''"'"' -' .... ·· ;;ii e,on,,,s,.c.s,csCTCTY"C"--· -, (P)~;;~.';;::';;;,.° ~:,~..":~~-i~ ' ', c~I m ~-?UND BARRIER DETAIL ~··Mobile· ,_,,lf<llfflOCUlUll'l<W'l'N tonllU.,WA-H _.,_,_,_ PROJIECT INFORMATION, I KENNYDALE / WSDOT SE2545A $OUTH &. ADJ TO 2219 MU.IIOW ........ N AENTON,llll'ANOe [IIHLIIED:A:LDINQ PERMIT 11 REYUIION N19TOllY, .... ----~:."."~· ;M •mm C::,~ro 6 "'-'""""" 6 ·~-""'"""- /~ PU.NS PREP.I.RED BY I B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AYE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 l 206•851•1106 [ DRAWN BY, --CHK. DY,::l#PY. BY, u I JL an wl IUC:ENSUAE, . ~ .. /::~):•., :;· .... \': \;'$;i]~~{}i [l:::::.:::,c,m,se•• ""'"=l~ I LOC'1SD()H A !IC' J.GL. STEEL r.<lNDPDI.E ~rn 013 [:llJIP\l[SllNAFENCEDCO .... ou,·o ORAWIN" •M~ftn~•~A•• I--=-~----, l "~,,~:'c.:'.::',--~ "'""'""" ••• ""° "· I f ~1ij[iJfi{;tF!~i~~~;t lOMM::~~~ r1=i.s ii 0 ~~:~. ,.-:f o' ;·· ('a; ~:::: 0, C • ~ • " • • • : • ~ z • .. z, .. ; 1 I ' , :;i:' i ' ! j ' I . ...-~ ... -·-"' . , ! ! ' • 1 II I' i 'I ' ! II! i I J\!J ,:.-· 'I 1, ~'" ai~ >c'~ -~~ ~ ~~~~i~~i 11 i~l~t8n ,, ! • ' ! ;lllillllllll!Hll~ffilllllllllnl / ' / P -T _/_ • ~-: ~ ~-~ ~ :__-; _'-;-__:_--:-l---, T --I [--G~·:·. 1 'C-,I-·-,-' ---.;>--p-e e-··' I I / -,-,----, ' l(i'1"1M~~~~':':t')n ("l'°'"M~m I 1"'\ICf~DLI"l'q:!"'r""l'l~' .. ~UH<"~'" ---, -, -, --I T ~ ------r·--I ~l'IH"""'f , ~Ll·-:-fl'"'cJ J /--:-o-/ <_ -_ -_c_--_~ --_ - IM~MlNIHlll*"IIIIIIHlll<lttM'~ PANEL SCHEDULE ::::'· ~t, .. ",_:::::: r,os ~t: : ===le.er ~: l:=E •s I. -I ··-)1) ~ • ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN ( ' / • / ;;::::'~"~ S<OS"INGTRASSFO,YEa ELECTRICAL NOTES: •,,c-,i,cJ.1wM••-1o "'"""""'-' ,,cmanA,ccv,,r-n<,u,na,:r -,,e•atc.ALCOOCA'°Af/YLOCAI. Cil"C-,CC<Jt<TY .,,~, .. ,,, .. - •>1••2';m,,,•1 Gv.' ELECTRICAL BLOCK DIAGRAM ill}f~JJ~· ;~,,.:~;~~ I -~·;~~;~"' l_ ____ _ I I (ro<,O I I _,,,._,,c.a,AM L_~_:'' '°'-~;';,'~~~ + + + + LiGHTl>~>FC "'" etc ELECTRICAL ONE LINE ::i: • ·Mobile· 1-> MO,...NC•H• PKWI' M .............. ...,., OPPIC• 1-1 >H-7«11> PFIDJICT IN,011111.1.TION, I KENNVDALE / WSDOT SE2545A I SOUTH & ADJ TO 2119 MUDOW AHN REHTON,WA98085 lfl.el,IED FOR, [ BU-ILDING PERMIT 11 DEm•1DN HISTORY% &"""'"'~ei?.\'" 8"·-'""""'"'· /i\ """°"' -· ·u~ PFtEP.r,FtEO BY• B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 BOTH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 CRAW a~~ =_cH:;v,= AP: s 1 UCl::M$UFII::• --~--,·~,:'.\ t;~t~t:::i.:i ''"'"''""''"'''"ccoccueo,.,m [ l'..":".',:::::·~·:::"""'"''''-1 '"'"""'"-·"''~'"''"""-'"'" ,...,o"""'"' ,..,,se•;1ws1ssueso,rH1SD'U,W1NG '""'""'-"'°""""'"""'1csre,,,,= ™' '"''-"'~•flON c,::,,r""'° , n,,s '" OF oc~c,Me,,s" epo,,o,c,,syovNanJS[ ,wus. OROISCI °'""' C™E"™-'N-""<,ca~a"'""'""""'""""" '"'"'"""""·"'" l-::~:RICAL SITE PLAN ' ['M""'""E · 1 I I ( \ ---\-------rr ! ----- I ' I :·1·~ I\~ ~ ' ' 1' , I , I I 'l, !' · .. µ t ~L ~\W I ' ' <,] <~ <cl<] <J I ,_,_,_,_,_,t, -r • ' I ' I ! _! I ! • -----·.--- ' ,_,_,_, 1-- ' ' • __ if / N I Ill i I ) • (l) -. :0 !,1 0 1!1 ~ ii! • Ii • i ~- ' i I I ' r ' ! \\ I 1 I ! I ' , I ' ' '-.I a: :) y / + ' ' ' ' C, I Ill 0 1Gb1z< ;,<~ , I.~. (:t """" Q1) r5lr\1~ X, '<, ..• '"" "'""'' ~;;,~;;t;:~~fz~11:1~~ ~.~\i ,o.,c_;o., • .,,., ,c~c·""'~"™ ·,';',°:c':~·.~~;".=';;,'~':. / / /,,,,' ~\ I".\ »AC,FA(J>(IOlffi,NC .... " "°""""coo E<>.W ·~· :'fc, -~ .] I :?.;-. I (3----1 . '•!s'jy;,. "'"':f "'""'-"'°""CT,SS:D c.Ft<luNo...-.•aov,n, 11,e,aMs, "~"'"~,w.,ao ,:.c,>o(O~"ICT'.,..:aJ m ~PICAL C~_DWELD CONNECTIONS I (_i) PMISCOHO"CTOO co,,,asc,,._~, @ "'",<COFOERCL,\0SfEclGOO..NDR00 @c,nWFLO-YPF-s" @e>"'"-Lo·,ee·~-· {T:) GROUND ROD CONNECTION ~ "" i VhM1,i%f;h:J ~ MF!'" 'P•Y•~''""'l'OUOC"GftA,:O wrc.POUNO" ON' ,e OF cry.,enw• -~ .,n HOU: •T r ;";',;':';H~~-~~;.~::o~CONC, """''00~ • 1 ' L__ Prn,.,n:R GISC>JHO NINO CI) GROUND INSPECTION WELL \.'__. H'S A•Ci<DWEL[) MGB AT BTS EQUIPMENT & BOTTOM OF POLE ~,-sss-,s WA.SHFA/Ner (}~) ~,FI.OUND BAR DETAILS ~"·""''""""'"' / Q",C'" '"'"""' ~<ttl1bt::J Hu-cu, •N'I-OID!llNG CV""C'JNO ··<'-,...,scoc,w,:; \_ ..-,,,,.,uc,,.r MSHEFCTYP) 'WO,UC<:O"Oe,;SOC" CH,MP .UG<•l>CC•JJusr-ec,.·,wo ''"''""'-" ~ ' ' , . . AOB TOP OF POLE Q") ~ICAL CABINET GROUNDING DETAIL :_r-• ·Mobile· ,_,.,.,m.., ..... ....,,. "°"' .......... ,, CIFPICOl420l-TOOG PAOJRC"T INFOIU,L\TION I KENNYDALE / WSDOT SE2!145A SOUT14 & ADJ TO 2219 MU.DOW AYE N JIENTON,WAMOM [(UUED :R~LDING PERMIT 11 ,-REVISION HISTORY, I .......... _,,,,...,,,,., ........ ~~=''" """'"" '"°'"''''" ""'"'"' ,,.,.,,,,.,s,,,cw L PLANS PREPARED BY I B, J, THOMAS, P.E, 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 [IDRA-:~=_cN:;Y,~~1 rUCINIURlta - ,ti:;) •hu~~ [1•.:~:,::::,,~,oes "" """-11 "'"'''0"''"""'''""'"""0''"'"'"'"" COU-N',N>CC,CCOCOl,OOCUNO DRAWINn '"'""""'a-rv,~- ll :::::::.:.:::::~:-~,-,;: : ... ,,_, ... ~, ---·,-,-"'"'"I i~i]Eri;iE;~rt~1¥£~~: DRAWING TITI.I!, ll . ELECTRICAL GROUNDING DETAILS ~OMM•••ii-4 II • Cl> .0 i,, O 1!1 .. ~ Iii i_ Ho! ! ~ ~~ ii ; ,m, 1,i1illihhli11mi,l1i!l1lil11lii 111 l I 1 l i I 1 I ! j ] I I ! I l 1' I I I I <] -~ • Q.) ~ ! -. 0 • a :OH .. !I 3~ O 1l1 j -· •< •• . , ~ i[! i -· •• a~ el • !il s 0 >'" ii i" • z . ' z • H-1 -t ~ I • i f II ~ l r, !• ~ ~~ i " • ~ . I " z !! 0 • -e s ~ $ m a •• i e ' !!L-11! " X X X ' ,, ~ 1 ~ :_, I <J<<2:l<··· ; I I X -' - Lx-x-x-x-x-x--x-x i X -X -X -X --1 X X X X X X -x-x--x-x-1 NOTES: c,,eas'CA'""'°""""'-"·AS"COU'"'"'ueso,cceo•o·cc~e>.e,eDU<-<Hl~'CH'eU -cpso,, ,sn 7 -0...,,c"o "'"'"M•JLC• ""''" oa no,o-,, • s,:,ca,oc ,o, "'" <" OCF"""H aEUCVE DEORISO STONE L<PCER '""' ;,4• SA"Y DIMENS OS R..WNINS ·:~~,~~:~0-~~;~~;,:':'::~":'";~,~·i,'"::_:~::~~t ,. tmH New tOPS<),c ~,r>< s,.BSQ'l ,,: •otco~-v. nc_,NC.."l.ACE "'" ~"CH OE"™ ,oe,;o,c CONRJHe lUWASHINGTON "'"' o,or C, AGHICUL TUFE c,>'50A) WASH:NGTO,, S1'TE CTA'O>f10S""'1N""'°[0'5TOC1(.000CR,c• •62j ~\IERCAk...,_TlONAI SlAf<l~qOSINSl!lJ"'<M<Sl) I.NS'1"11"'""'"""•""M.l>AROS >C-..N\.O<SSS<S'OC• """ C'SJO'N' CO'"' ne, 0, HQaTICUl; oae hONC"OL,>-Un< S,>NQ,aOOc,NO """ """"" sro,,c, """"'"" ..c 1 f'C'EC' ""'" ••c• ""~ '"" DMW)[ "All """' raCTECTl'ffS ,,,,.,c -"'"'""'"' '""'HG 'm1A•CnCSA'C CC••CO••G>U. D."OS!:C OR.\NCOC'; .~,CCN0"")<<S ''"'"''"'"·"""'"'"""""""""'""""'·""'"'"·""""'"""""5<'""' WESTHES CONOl'ICM, »lD ,ccEP-EDPR,cnc, OLAl<T"G °'""'noNS "'"'" CONDcCT[O '>NOES UNSD.S0"<MIL[ co.on,c.s av •ccCeTll<G'"' em,:,,""'"'" """""'""''"'"MT ,,.sc,,•,.,c nsscs ~Ar,,u,-,Au.ec,,N """""'-'"°''"'"' """"'"<.C'-"<m '"'''-""-'"' "0 ,ANTl""T,LLATICN "-'''" ro OCACCu.,m, ,o "" PSOJECTS"[ '"""o""'"'" co.c ""'' ,c CO.DHCJRAC,E"'-h>ITIS ""-L MOOV<.."?l'laO :o,O) S'C<.< ,S """''"'' TO t«oe,A •oo-STHUGTU"E SU",C,ENO,O,N5,0C5',JITVe,,C>NDHEAl'l-<'GOCW,o COS!s!SERGRQW>< """""'-' AR[ SEQLJiFIED ·o HA\'E S,,FFICHT """' ·o ectDT·• "<0,SM<'H'N"C<W>CN"'-"-'.">C>"""'"''""'"'"'""U'NU'OSHUH"""HO Co:>RMuu., "'--SPL"Nl[ .. ,, """"""' aSCOG• ,.c,.·,c "'"""'O """''"'"""'"""""""°""''"'"'"""'""""'"·"'-' AUHl,URM rABL.c"S '1-0t«MSlle "5"'NL'AC!U<<C a,s:,•,.oae INTEPV<T>C>'W. :,CM,G/,L$,IHC 20-IC-SA<>LY"'° APLYA"R,\"COf E'C''"""--'""N~HC,C PLACE PL,NT I> UPRIC,.TPOSIOON IN CEN'ER OF 'IT R[•Cl"/E AAY POOO CO'.',.INO A$UC"''-'''"°'""..WHW"''QH<V>a,,_.,.e><•cseee"''"''""'O 'C" .. ,.,,,,, ~""'"'""'"""'""' "'"'-'"'''""'"''·"-'''"'"" C[O"'-W:ASSOCC~EO Sla<E,ND~L/YsSSl'FC"IF, =;";;;~'::::~~::~.';;;;~'t::;.';; :;:;~';" ~=~~ye:~::~~:::, '~" '"'"' ~ ~ "~"""'o"""·'"''""' (1\ TREE PLANTING/STAKING DETAIL , ,o) o.Oho<Cm ~ ::.,,_ """'"''""""" ''° EB SHRUB SPACING @ PLANTING DETAIL ,.,~,"~'""''~··· ""'"'""'~~"""~- ~--···-~""~ ~·-·,m~••·~y. w SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL L-' . .J ,r,nnsc,.., ~··Mobile· 1-,N<>lffllCRDl< ... WYN IIOTMll.l.,Wll-•1 _,_, __ - PROJ~ INFIMlloUITICIN SE2545A r KENNYDALE I WSDOT SOV111 a JID,I TO 2219 MU.DOW •v• N RENTON, WA 98065 UUEDFCIR, [[ BUILDING PERMIT RnlSKJN HISTORY, & ~19•1"06 lc'.:OWLJHD ""'""" &-~1'®'11°/YRD<J'ING &,,woo, sPO<•rns.s·= /\ Ll Plll.N$ PREPllRED BY I] I 8. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851,1106 r DILt.WN "' --CIIK. llY, = &PPII. av, l JL IIJT AM [ ___ .. L , ,~ru•nnr. ·-"""""·=~ [Ii;,;;;;;~;~~::~~:~ I llii~~ r10UM==~:::J l[UM~'"i:.2 II r,;, H> :nB; .,v, rcao .oas (e77) .,.,,,,c; ••""" v~ ·1,ar,nR ·,o, ,,.,,s ~ d.\b~C'd ~]]~> ~JOON ,-n~,;; .. anqow .. ili JO YSD JIAI8J]1JXY JIHl :,JOJ -- ' ' ' : ' 1 + •- i ,I_ i 1:/,:'l. "" -- \a"·osocWU-'OdOU.~a ijeg, ~;s~nf, 311J,1163J 3,~!IDd~CJ JW3>~ns o~v- 16rn6 \r~. J~~l A3NNOO '1S¥3 ]l~UIJ 3~01~ 60C>i H,< -.-., ·,.,I, ""'<'; ',\ •' r ,0'] .,•;, ,,, ' 'I.\ ¥11, 'NJ103~ ~ooc~ oon A"Jln'<Moa• JTifGANNJ~ V 9\>Sl 38 C3S~nH 111S I f'-~~=~~~"c"c"~, (/) Nl~.:;~HJ lN.W/1, AF m~J'HJ JJICJ T~0~1~ ~s H,O<J~ --J OJC 'g mcJ~J.•.J~ C.~J . ! I <ii <ii <c] < < . -I I ii ~1 Iii ~ z ~ 0 0 E ~ E ~1 ~ % Iii ~ • ~ J ,· ~, ~ " n J ~~ ~ i~ " , ii~ -i) ~~g ~~I, 1~~ ~ . ~ ,, • ' ' ' • ! 0 • g, -. 0 i:iH .. It •c 0 1!1 • -~ .. ~.I ~p ! ~m .. h •• . i:i : c~ iA • ! I ~ .. 1! ! ' !! • i I I! z i ' ' ! I ' z • HI. E w I 51 ! ! ii ~ ~ § a i 5 I <1<~<'1< --1 f ~ [TIil . I • 0 C e ~ t ~g @! ~~ ·~~ ~::m j . • • • ~ ' ' h L ii c::a:-I , y ! • • 0 t; 0 • w Q .. w .. " % 4 ~ ~ " m C · 11!~;,r-1··. 1;1 ~ ~ ... ~~§~;~., uj;: ~ h ~;;i~!~ :, : ! ' I: I ,,._,·,.. . ii l'>i-<i CC ci: 3 ';' ,t ~ :;-~-· ·,1~~ '. a~\ i ~~~~~li~ :E :c ii;,; ~ :~/~,:%~: 1~~ i: i1agHf ~!~II \:, ~ 11 h!l!ii 11 ;~ -, 0 ~ N .. ., Iii ••••• ~ !~; ! ~e !I§~{ m ~ ac lii .. ~ .. 8~~ i ~:i~H~ CC l .. iii ~"~ -86_q~e :.: i ~ ~ ~~~ il~UliH ~ ~ ,-~H ~~) 'I t I i 0 11: z _)= • " ' .. z " . z ~ = 0 i ~ 0 -r-;r 0 ~- ~ ~ !i l j • " ~ ~ ~~ 0 "'' ~ w i z ! '. \. ,,: " ' I z . ' ' m w § d' ~ ~ u '0' " ,,___ • ~.=.~ w z z 'q ~ y ~ .,j " ~ " i ~;;; ~ .. ~ . ! ! ' 1 4 l !' z ,..';\ J= l!i ; ~ ' m 0 i z, ' y' cl Z e ~ a; !. "1 • . 4' N~ i1 1 ,;i,i;, ""i I 1 f:j,.,~~~~~ ;J .-] ·! ., ' -+ • ! 0 • Q w .. " ~ 2 " ~ 1 I =-=,t ~~~ ·1' ~i ii-\ ' ~----'-I CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/ BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM Date: April 4, 2007 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: LUA {file) Number: Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Acceptance Date: Applicant: Owner: Contact: PIO Number: ERC Approval Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Mylar Recording Number: T-Mobile Monopole Kennydale LUA-06-173, CU-A, ECF Jill Ding January 5, 2007 T-Mobile USA WSDOT -c/o Mark Eldridge Michael Slotemaker -Wireless Facilities, Inc. N/A January 29, 2007 February 19, 2007 February 5, 2007 February 19, 2007 Date: Date: Project Description: The applicant is requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the installation of a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure and assoicated equipment cabinets. The project site is approximately 600 square feet of WSDOT right-of-way. Access to the project site would be provided off of Meadow Avenue N. · Location: East of 2219 Meadow Avenue N, within WSDOT R-0-W . Comments: STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Jody L. Barton, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact J'orm an1H:xcd was published in regular issues of tht.': Rcnlon Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during th~ belmv stated period. The an1H.:xcd notice. a: Public Notice was published on February 3. 2007. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$105.00. le_¢ Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter subscribed anct sworn to me this s'h day of February, 2007. NOTICE Or' ENVIRONMENTAL DE'fERMINA'fJON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHIKGTON The Envirunnwnial Rcviev.' Cnmmiltcc has issued a Dekrmirnititm of .Non-Significance for tlir' fr1h1wi11g prnj(1cl undr1r tlw :i11thorit_v of the Ri-·nton i\-h,.nicip::11 ('nde. T-!\-1ohi!(• .\lo11op11ic Kf•nn~·dilk' Ll'A06-J~;l CL\ ff.F Location E:iM of 2:21 () Meadow Avenue N. within WSDO'f R-0-W. The applicant 1M requef'.ting Administrative Conditional Use Permit. approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the inst.c,llation of a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure and asRrK'iate1I eq11ipment cahinet~. The ,> ., .. ,, .. il/1,, ·.\ _;~ ''" \ C , ,,, . , -7 /,,----\ .--,,, ~ F .. ,,, o on .:·1~,.. . , 7 J.) ( {_/2 ?;(;/(·? / 1' "' <x> •• "';..;,;::.'"'-'.,'._'l., •. S... <' 1-~ •• ol"f'· ·· .:,c~~J.1, ~ . B D Cantclon ~ • •. G · A,\"'~; -:;. '.~· Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Ke . , w;stii_.{gi;m \{;·-:·,--..:~~) <:.\> '., :~:. '· P. 0. Number: '' · · pru_jed ~ite i:-approxinwtdy 600 squarC' feet ofWSDOT right-of-way. Arcess to the proje.::t site would be provided off of M eadrw.' Avenui~ I',". Appeals of the environmental det€rmination mu;;;t be filed in writing on or twfore 5:00 PM on Februarv 19, 2007 Appcds must hr, filf'<l in writing- tog-Ptlwr with the n'qt:in:rl 87:i.OO il[l!J!indion fr,p \Yith: llt>a?·ing E\'.:1rn1m'r_ C1tv of Ih:nlon. 1115::i Soulh Crnd:, Way,· Henton, W.:\ $)80f>fi-. 1\ppe,d:-0 tu the Examiw•1 an· g0verned by Cil_v uf R1~nton Mun1(:ipal f:od(> Section 4--8-110.B. Additional information regarding the-appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430- 6510. Publishe-d in the H.enton Reporter Febnrnry 3, 2007. #862820 City u, nenton Department of Planning I Building I Pu, .. ; Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: APPLICATION NO: LUA06-173, CU-A, ECF APPLICANT: T-Mobile USA PROJECT TITLE: T-Mobile Monopole -Kennvdale SITE AREA: 600 square feet LOCATION: E of 2219 Meadow Ave N, within WSDOT R-0-W COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2007 DATE CIRCULATE~· "r b, 2001 1 PROJECT MA~GER: 111 Dinn __./ \ \ -) PLAN REVIEW: Arneta Henninner - BUILDING AREA lnross): N/A \0,, WORK ORDER NO: 77707 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the installation of a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure and assoicated equipment cabinets. The project site is approximately 600 square feet of WSDOT right-of-way. Access to the project site would be provided off of Meadow Avenue N. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable Mora Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minar Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Liahf/Gfare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnortation Environmental Health Public SeNices Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feel 14,000 Feet 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addit' na · formation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date i..,~ r,, CIT' OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator -~(\'Y 0~ 1i: ; Kathy Keolker, Mayor /!)1\"fo;,·----------------------------------- February 22, 2007 Michael Slotemaker Wireless Facilities, Inc. 575 Andover Park W #201 Tukwila, WA 98188 SUBJECT: T-Mobile Monopole -Kennydale LUA06-173, CU-A, ECF Dear Mr. Slotemaker: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended on February 19, 2007 for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance and Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on both the ERC determination and the Administrative Conditional Use Permit. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with the Conditional Use Permit's conditions of approval ·outlined in the Report and Decision dated February 5, 2007. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, cj»1{µu·V' v7!i~-~.:.-~ing Senior Planner cc: WSDOT / Owner _______ 10_5_5_S_ou-th_G_ra_d_y_W_a_y __ -R-en-to_n_,_W_a_sh-in_g_to_n_9_8_0_57 _______ ~ ~ Thi,; n::merc:nnt,11n,; .'i0%, l'Pr.vdi=,rl ma:iffiri.::il '.ln% =t mn,;, ,mAr AHEAD OF THE CURVE REPORT & DECISION REPORT DA TE: Project Name: Owner: Applicant: Contact: File Number: Project Description: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: Project Location Map City of Renton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION February 5, 2007 T-Mobile Monopole Kennydale WSDOT CIO Mark Eldridge 310 Maple Park Ave SE Olympia, WA 98501 Michael Slotemaker T-Mobile USA 19807 North Creek Pkwy N Bothell, WA 98011 Michael Slotemaker Wireless Facilities, Inc. 575 Andover Park W, ste 201 Tukwila, WA 98188 LUA06-173, CU-A, ECF Project Manager: Jill K. Ding The applicant is requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the installation of a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure and associated equipment cabinets. The project site is approximately 600 square feet of WSDOT right-of-way. Access to the project site would be provided off of Meadow Avenue N. (Please see additional project description on the next page) East of 2219 Meadow Avenue N, within WSDOT right-of-way NIA Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: NIA 600 sq. ft. Total Building Area SF: NIA TMobilecup.doc City of Renton P/8/PW Departmen. T-MOBILE MONOPOLE KENNYD. __ c:: Administrative Conditional Use Report LUA-06-173 CU-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF February 5, 2007 Page 2of7 II PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The monopole will have a drilled concrete pier foundation that will got to a depth of approximately 20 feet below grade. A 20-foot by 30-foot area will be leveled, compacted, and have course crushed gravel placed on top to provide a stable work surface around the base of the monopole. The applicant is proposing to pour a 10-foot by 15-foot concrete slab where the radio cabinets, back-up power cabinets, and other auxiliary equipment will be placed. A 6-foot chain link fence with three runs of barbed wire fence will enclose the equipment area. On the north side of the project site, a 10- foot landscaped buffer will be installed, with a 4-foot wide gravel path going down the west side of the project are to Meadow Avenue N to provide a safe walking route for the technicians. Once complete, the project would generate a roximatel 1 visit er month. I PART TWO: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION -REPORT & DECISION A. Type of Land Use Action Site Plan Review XX Shoreline Substantial Develo ment Permit XX Conditional Use Administrative) Bind in Site Plan --+-~~~~~cc-c-cc-c-~-,-,----- S p e c i a I Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Project (yellow) file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Site Plan (Dated 12/19/06) Exhibit No. 3: Enlarged Site Plan (Dated 12/19/06) Exhibit No. 4: Site Elevation (Dated 12/19/06) Exhibit No. 5: Landscape Plan (Dated 12/19/06) Exhibit No. 6: T-Mobile Coverage After Installation Exhibit No. 7: Photo looking south from intersection of Meadow Ave N and N 241" St Existing Conditions Exhibit No. 8: Photo looking south from intersection of Meadow Ave N and N 24'" St Proposed Conditions Exhibit No. 9: Photo taken from east side of 1-405 looking southwest Existing Conditions Exhibit No. 10: Photo taken from east side of 1-405 looking southwest Proposed Conditions Exhibit No. 11: Photo taken from east side of 1-405 looking west Existing Conditions Exhibit No. 12: Photo taken from east side of 1-405 looking west Proposed Conditions Exhibit No. 13: Zoning Map sheet D4 west Y, (Dated 2/16/06) C. Consistency with Conditional Use Permit Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Conditional Use Criteria set forth in Section 4-9-030, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code & other ordinances TMobilecup.doc The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standard of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. a. Comprehensive Plan, Its Elements and Policies The Comprehensive Plan objective for telecommunication services is to promote the timely and orderly expansion of all forms of telecommunications services within the City and the remainder of its Planning Area. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are applicable to the proposal: Policy U-100. Require that the siting and location of telecommunications facilities be accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. City of Renton P/8/PW Departmenl T-MOB/LE MONOPOLE KENNYDALc Administrative Conditional Use Report LUA-06-173 CU-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF February 5, 2007 Page 3of7 The proposed monopole I structure has been sited in an area that is flat and over 40 feet away from the nearest slopes. The proposed site was chosen for the minimal impacts it would have on the slopes. Policy U-101. Require that cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be collocated on existing structures and towers wherever possible and practical. The proposed location was chosen to maximize the use of existing trees to screen the monopole from the surrounding residential neighborhood. No trees would be removed as a result of project construction. b. Zoning Code The project area is located within Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) right-of-way, which is not within any zoning designation. The project site abuts a Residential Multi-Family (RM-F) zone to the west. The proposal for the installation of a monopole I support structure within public right- of-way abutting the RM-F zone is permitted subject to the approval of an Administrative Conditional Use Permit. c. Development Standards Lot Coverage -Not applicable as the proposed monopole I structure and associated equipment cabinets do not have building foot prints and would be installed within WSDOT right-of-way. Setbacks -Not applicable as the proposed monopole 1 structure and associated equipment cabinets would be located with WSDOT right-of-way. Landscaping -Landscaping around the associated equipment cabinets shall be screened and/or landscaped as determined by the reviewing official. The proposal includes a 6-foot chain link fence with three runs of barbed wire around the project site. A 10-foot landscaped buffer is proposed along the north side to screen the equipment cabinets from the residential properties to the north. The existing trees to the west and south of the project site are proposed to further screen the project site from the surrounding properties. The proposed landscape strip would be composed of 2 Douglas Fir, 2 Western Red Cedar, 3 Pacific Wax Myrtle, 4 Strawberry Trees, and a ground cover consisting of Kinnickkinnick. Staff has reviewed the proposed landscape plan. The proposed landscaping appears to adequately screen the equipment cabinets from the properties to the north. Building Height -A monopole I structure is less than 60 feet in height. The proposed monopole would be 59 feet 11 inches and would therefore qualify as a monopole I structure. Parking -The applicant anticipates one service technician will visit the site per month. No specific parking requirements are applicable to Monopole I structures. Therefore, staff recommends as a condition of approval that 1 parking space be required for the anticipated monthly visits by the service technician. 2. Community Need TMobilecup.doc There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the Administrator shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: City of Renton P/8/PW Departmen T-MOBILE MONOPOLE KENNYD .. Administrative Conditional Use Report LUA-06-173 CU-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF February 5, 2007 Page 4 of 7 a. The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. With the project application, the applicant submitted a map showing the locations of existing monopoles. The closest monopole support structure is located on the east side of Interstate -405 on NE 30'" Street, which is approximately 2,500 feet away from the proposed site. In addition, the applicant notes that the primary reason the subject site was selected is due to an existing area of very weak coverage in their network. The proposed location is intended to help "fill in the gap" of a weak coverage area. It does not appear that the proposed monopole I structure would result in an over concentration of monopole structures in the immediate vicinity of the project. b. That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. In addition to providing additional service in a weak service area, the project site is surrounded by existing, mature dense vegetation. All of the ground equipment and a majority of the monopole would be screened from public view by vegetation, which consists of an existing row of 20-foot to 40-foot tall trees located between 1-405 and the project site, dense shrubs, blackberries, and mature evergreen trees located to the south of the site, a 15-foot Native Growth Protection Easement located to the west of the site, and a proposed 10-foot wide landscaped buffer that would be installed along the north side of the project site. The project site is located more than 40 feet away from existing slopes located to the south and west of the project site. There are no other critical areas located on or around the site. Therefore, it appears that the proposed location is suitable for the monopole I structure and associated equipment cabinets. 3. Effect on Adjacent Properties TMobilecup.doc The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: a. Lot Coverage -Lot coverage shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Not applicable as the proposed monopole I structure and associated equipment cabinets would not have building foot prints and the proposed structures would in installed within WSDOT right-of-way. b. Yards -Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. Not applicable as the proposed monopole 1 structure and associated equipment cabinets would be located with WSDOT right-of-way. c. Height -Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Building heights should be related to surrounding uses in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. The maximum height for a monopole I structure is required to be less than 60 feet. The proposed monopole would be 59 feet 11 inches in height and would qualify as a monopole I structure. City of Renton P/8/PW Departmen T-MOBILE MONOPOLE KENNYD~-- Administrative Conditional Use Report LUA-06-173 CU-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF February 5, 2007 Page 5of7 4. Compatibility The proposed monopole I structure would be installed within the WSDOT 1-405 right-of-way. The 1-405 freeway would be located to the east of the project site, and a Native Growth Protection Easement would be located to the west. The WSDOT right-of-way continues on to the north and south of the project site. In addition, existing mature vegetation in combination with a 10-foot proposed landscaped buffer would screen all of the equipment cabinets and most of the monopole structure. Therefore, it appears that the proposed project would be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. 5. Parking The applicant anticipates one service technician will visit the site per month. No specific parking requirements are applicable to Monopole I structures. Therefore, staff recommends as a condition of approval that 1 parking space be required for the anticipated monthly visits by the service technician. 6. Traffic Once the construction of the project is complete, there is anticipated to be one additional traffic trip per month attributable to the project. Noise, Glare While the construction impacts for the installation of the monopole I structure may result in and increase in noise, these impacts would be short-term impacts. No long term noise and glare impacts would result from the installation of the fiber optic lines underground. Landscaping See previous discussion above under Development Standards. 7. Accessory Uses Not applicable. 8. Conversion Not applicable, no conversion is proposed. 9. Public Improvements No additional public improvements will be required for this proposal. XX Co ies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Administrative Conditional Use Permit Approval for the T-Mobile Monopole Kennydale No. LUA-06-173 CU-A, ECF. 2) Environmental Review: The City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has reviewed the proposal and issued a determination of non-significance (DNS). 3) Conditional Use Permit Review: The applicant's Conditional Use Permit application complies with the requirements for information necessary for Conditional Use Permit review. The applicant's construction drawings and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 13. TMobilecup.doc City of Renton P!BIPW Departmen T-MOBILE MONOPOLE KENNYD . REPORT AND DECISION OF February 5, 2007 Administrative Conditional Use Report LUA-06-173 CU-A, ECF Page 6of 7 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Utilities Comprehensive Plan element, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 6) Zoning: The project site is located within WSDOT right-of-way, and is therefore not located within a zoning designation. However, the site abuts a Residential Multi-Family (RM-F) zone to the west. The proposal complies with the development standards of the Wireless Communication Facilities, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 7) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: 1-405 right-of- way; East: 1-405 right-of-way; South: 1-405 right-of-way; West: Residential Multi-Family (RM-F). E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan Utilities element; and development standards for the Wireless Communication Facilities, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 3) The City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has reviewed the proposal and issued a determination of non-significance (DNS). F. Decision The Conditional Use Permit for the T-Mobile Monopole Kennydale, File No. LUA06-173 CU-A, ECF is approved subject to the following condition: 1. 1 parking space shall be required for the anticipated monthly visits by the service technician. This parking space shall be shown on the site plan submitted for the building permit review for review an approval by the Development Services Division project manager. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: 'ii .I -'-· //.,/,,,/ £1 {,(/(/I// Neil Watts, Development Services Director TRANSMITTED this 5th day of February, 2007 to the owner: Washington State Department of Transportation C/0 Mark Eldridge 310 Maple Park Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98501 TRANSMITTED this 5th day of February, 2007 to the applicant: Micheal Slotemaker T-Mobile USE 19807 North Creek Pkwy N Bothell, WA 98011 TRANSMITTED this 5th day of February, 2007 to the contact: TMobilecup.doc FEBRUARY 5, 2007 )( { 7 Date City of Renton P/8/PW Departmen, T-MOBILE MONOPOLE KENNYD. ·'-- Administrative Conditional Use Report LUA-06-173 CU-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF February 5, 2007 Michael Slotemaker Wireless Facilities, Inc. 575 Andover Park W, ste 201 Tukwila, WA 98188 TRANSMITTED this 5th day of February, 2007 to the Parties-of-Record: No Parties of Record TRANSMITTED this 5th day of February, 2007 to the following: Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Larry Meckling, Building Official Larry Rude, Fire Marshall Kayren Kittrick, Public Works Division Renton Reporter Page 7 of 7 Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.C075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 19, 2007. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations Planning 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 am and 8:00 pm, Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between 9:00 am and 8:00 pm, No work shall oe permitted on Sundays. Plan Review -Water 1. The project needs to maintain a 15-foot separation from the existing water main. 2. The contractor shall call for utilities locate before any excavation near the water line. 3. A concern is stray currents damaging the water main. Plan Review Sanitary Sewer 1. The project needs to maintain a 10-foot separation from the existing sanitary sewer main. Plan Review General 1. T-Mobile has a current Franchise Agreement with the City. 2. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to the City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. All civil engineering plans shall be tied into a minimum of two of the City of Renton current Horizontal and Vertical Control network. 4. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs: 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. TMobilecup.doc ~-1 I .---,r--="-- __ f __ _ _T ___ _ ---------i+--~14 / . -d -,_ -- ( ! 'l I _\_\ /--------------- -,/ \ \, ·(1------, . ..-···-- ( /' J _\ j \ i I ' I 1 l ! I l : I § ' ... I ... I 1 1 I ~ ' ; I t 1 ! • . ~ g " " " . ' iii!! 11m ' I I jllll ! i 1 i ~i~i! ! I i l''I' I I I I j 1111111 • ! I I ! I l • i I ~-- ! I I ' ! ~ ' ' •ro Q) $ ~ tlJ Indoor Coverage [] In Car Coverage • Poor/Outdoor Coverage .~,~ .. • 0 No Coverage ~ Existing Site fl Proposed Site ~tie t f\} -~ . . KENNYDALE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASH INGTON BLVD N RENTON , WA 98065 EXISTING #1 FROM INTERSECTION O F MEADOW AVE N & N 24TH ST LO OKING S OUTH 19807 NO RTH C REEK P KWY N BOTHELL, WA 980 11 OFFICE (425 ) 39 8-76 00 -~ -l . opo~~& C<Jnd-.,'+ ~OY\-5 KENNYDALE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N R E NTO N. WA 98065 PROP0SED#1 FROM INTERSECTION OF M EAD9 W AV E N & N 24TH ST LO OKIN G SO L~TH 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL. WA 980 11 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 KENNYDALE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASHING TON BLVD N RENTON , WA 980 65 EXISTIN G #2 f-ROM EAST SJDE OF 4 05 FREEw.;f l00KIN G 3 0UTH-WES T ... ,, ., .... 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHEL L WA 9801 1 OFFICE (425) 398 -7 600 1 ,• ; ~~po~e& Lb'(\r}.l * \ OY\. :J . ' KE NNY DALE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON , WA 98065 PROPOSED#2 _~P.OM EAST SIDE OF 4 05 FREf;Xl/A'f(OOY.ING.f":•)UTH-WEST ;:•....:...-4 . 19807 NOR TH CREEK PKWY N . ;t BOTHELL WA 98011 OFFIC E (425) 398-7600 i ' .' ... ,• ... t " <, KENNY DALE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASHINGTO N B LVD N RENTON. WA 98065 EXI STI NG #3 ·/:f ROM EAST SIDE OF 405 F~g,E~lO~K lt--{ir w EST m: ... . \ ~~ 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BO TH ELL . WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 KENNYDA LE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASHING TON B LVD N RENTON . WA 98065 PROPOSED#3 . ,• F~OM EAST SI DE O F 405 FR~~WAt-.t.OOtl NG,WES T ~ i . -~-,\·.. . ,,,<-:.. • .i4_ 19807 NOR TH CREE K PKWY N BOTHELL. WA 98011 OFF ICE (425) 398-7600 , . .,, ,I>-, .. C4 · 32 T24N R5E W 1/2 R-8 R-8 RM-F R-8 N 24th St. R-8 a, I "' CN ZONING P/B/PW TICHNICAL 8BB.VICB8 02/16lll6 E4 · 8 T23N RSE W 1/2 -----Rent.on City Limit.I ......------•• ~ 2~, 114800 5 T23N .. ,,-. tj .a,. R-8 ,.,. .~ . "' .... NE 2Z -~--r1; l'l RC :5 a, ' "' R:,CB t ---," R 1 90 .... D4 R5E w 1/2 530S ·-.;,,--· ""'··· ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: T-Mobile Monopole -Kcnnydale PROJECT NUMBER: LUA06-173, CU-A, ECF LOCATION: Ent of'2219 Meadow Avenue N, with WSOOT R-0-W DESCRIPTION: The applicar,1 is requesting Admlnletrative Conditional Use Permit approval and Envlronment•I lSEPA) Review for the installation of a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 etructure and assoclatild equipment cabinet.. The project s,te ,s aµµrn,imately 600 square feet of WSDOT right-of-way, Access to the Project site would be provided Off of Meadow Avenue N THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVICVV COMMITTEE (ERG) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVF A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT Appuls of the environmental dotermination must be med In writing on or before 5:00 PM on Februal']I 19, 2007. Appeal• rnu1t b11t fll,e,d In writing together with the required $75.00 •PPllcaUon fee with: Hurlng Exarnlnar, City o1 Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. WA 96055. Appeale to the E~amlner are governed by City ol Renton MunlcLpal Cod11t Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal procna may be obtained from the Renton City Clark's Offic11t, (425) 430-651 0. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. PLEAS[ CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 0:VISION AT (425) 430-7200 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. CERTIFICATION . ~ ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a 0<'otary Public, m and for the State of Washington resi · , on the 6 t"' ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: T-Mobile Monopole -Kennydale PROJECT NUMBER: LUAOG-173, CU-A, ECF LOCATION: East of 2219 Meadow Avenue N, with WSDOT R-0-W DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the installation of a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure and associated equipment cabinets. The project site is approximately 600 square feet of WSDOT right-of-way. Access to the project site would be provided off of Meadow Avenue N. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ERG) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on February 19, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. '\'.yY 0 CI' T OF RENTON \~": ~· -P Kathy Kcolker, Mayor tl,. O'''--;_----------------------------.r..!;'N'f '~ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator February 1, 2007 Michael Slotemaker Wireless Facilities, Inc. 575 Andover Park W #201 Tukwila, WA 98188 SUBJECT: T-Mobile Monopole -Kennydale LUA-06-173, CU-A, ECF Dear Mr. Slotemaker: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on January 29, 2007, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non- Significance. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on February 19, 2007. Appeals must be fried in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. If you have any ques.tions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, a 1:. 22-cp_;ng .~ t/f~n~~rD~lanner V cc: WSDOT -,Mark Eldridge/ Owner --~----------~ 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98057 /I:/t, Th;,.~---•--··•-·--,::,.,o,_ ·--·-'--' --•-..:-1 '>"O! __ _. ----• ·--• AHE.AO OF TH.t:: CURVE CI' T OF RENTON ~~~ . . ~ . "? --~ Kathy Keolker, Mayor Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator <S)N"fo February 1 . 2007 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on January 29, 2007: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: T-Mobile Monopole -Kennydale LUA06-173, CU-A, ECF East of 2219 Meadow Ave N, within WSDOT R-0-W DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the installation of a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure and associated equipment cabinets. The project site is approximately 600 square feet of WSDOT right-of-way. Access to the project site would be provided off of Meadow Avenue N. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on February 19, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are gov~rned by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, 4» 1{ J2· Senior Planner U c~~ _K: ~lng cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman. Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Cprp. of Engineers Stephanie Kramer, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Enclosure -------10_5_5_S_ou_t_h_G_ra_d_y_W_a_y_--R-en-to_n_, -W-a-,h-in-g-to_n_9_8_0_57 _______ ~ AHEAD OF THE CURVE 11' Th;.,""""'' rr,nt;,,n<, 'iff•/o ,c,,-.,,rl<>rl rv>"l"'ri"I -J.rlO/~ nnd rnn<,11rnPr CITY OF RENT<.,._ DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA06-173, CU-A, ECF T-Mobile USA APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: T-Mobile Monopole -Kennydale DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the installation of a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure and associated equipment cabinets. The project site is approximately 600 square feet of WSDOT right-of-way. Access to the project site would be provided off of Meadow Avenue N. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: East of 2219 Meadow Avenue N, within WSDOT R-0-W The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if com plaints are received. 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 am and 8:00 pm, Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between 9:00 am and 8:00 pm. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. Plan Review -Water 1. The project needs to maintain a 15-foot separation from the existing water main. 2. The contractor shall call for utilities locate before any excavation near the water line. 3. A concern is stray currents damaging the water main. Plan Review -Sanitary Sewer 1. The project needs to maintain a 10-foot separation from the existing sanitary sewer main. Plan Review -General 2. T-Mobile has a current Franchise Agreement with the City. 3. All required utility. drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to the City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 4. All civil engineering plans shall be tied into a minimum of two of the City of Renton current Horizontal and Vertical Control network. 5. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. ERC Advisory Notes Page 1 of 1 CITY OF RENTON , DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA06-173, CU-A, ECF T-Mobile USA APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: T-Mobile Monopole -Kennydale DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the installation of a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure and associated equipment cabinets. The project site is approximately 600 square feet of WSDOT right-of-way. Access to the project site would be provided off of Meadow Avenue N. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: East of 2219 Meadow Avenue N, within WSDOT R-0-W City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency wiU not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on February 19, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: erry Rigashiyama, Administra or Community Services February 3, 2007 January 29, 2007 . David Daniels. Fire Chief Fire Department /-29-()7 Date ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE January 29, 2007 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator I. David Daniels, Fire Chief Alex Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Meeting Date: Monday, January 29, 2007 Time: 3:00 PM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. Cedar River Business Park (Ding/ LUA06-172, SA-H, ECF The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval and Environmental Review for the construction of four office/retail/light industrial buildings totaling 143,307 square feet in area on a 539,272 square foot (12.4 acre) site located within the Light Industrial (IL) zoning designation and within the Employment Area -Valley overlay. Parking would be provided within 408 proposed parking stalls located around the perimeter of the buildings within a surface parking lot. Access to the project site would be provided via two commercial driveway entrances off of Lind Avenue SW. A Category 2 wetland is located along the northern property line and a Category 3 wetland is located along the southern and eastern property lines. T-Mobile Monopole Kennyda/e (Ding/ LUA06-173, CU-H, ECF The applicant is requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the installation of a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure and associated equipment cabinets. The project site is approximately 600 square feet of WSDOT right-of-way. Access to the project site would be provided off of Meadow Avenue N. cc: K. Keolker, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer S. Dale Estey, EDNSP Director® J. Gray, Fire Prevention N. Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman. Hearing Examiner L. Rude, Fire Prevention ® J. Medzegian, Council P. Hahn, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, Economic Development L. Warren. City Attorney ® STAFF REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DA TE: Project Name: Project Number: Project Manager: Project Description: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area gsf: ercrpt_ Tmobile,Wonopole.doc January 29, 2007 T-Mobile Monopole Kennydale LUA0?-173, CU-A, ECF Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner The applicant is requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the installation of a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure and associated equipment cabinets. The project site is approximately 600 square feet of WSDOT right-of-way. Access to the project site would be provided off of Meadow Avenue N. (Project Description continued on following page) East of 2219 Meadow Avenue N, within WSDOT right-of-way NIA Site Area: 600 square feet City of Renton PIB/PW Departme, T-MOBILE MONOPOLE KENN!, E REl'ORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 29. 2007 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) Environmental Review Committee Staff Report LUA06-l 73, CU-A, ECF Pagel of4 The monopole will have a drilled concrete pier foundation that will got to a depth of approximately 20 feet below grade. A 20-foot by 30-foot area will be leveled, compacted, and have course crushed gravel placed on top to provide a stable work surface around the base of the monopole. The applicant is proposing to pour a 10-foot by 15-foot concrete slab where the radio cabinets, back-up power cabinets, and other auxiliary equipment will be placed. A 6-foot chain link fence with three runs of barbed wire fence will enclose the equipment area. On the north side of the project site, a 10- foot landscaped buffer will be installed, with a 4-foot wide gravel path going down the west side of the project area to Meadow Avenue N to provide a safe walking route for the service technicians. Once complete, the project would generate approximately 1 maintenance visit per month. B. RECOMMENDA TJON Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINA T/ON OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE XX Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. C. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MIT/GA TED. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The topography of the project site is flat, however 30 percent slopes are located over 40 feet away to the south and west of the site. A geotechnical report prepared by Adapt Engineering, Inc., dated November 28, 2006 was submitted with the project application. According to the report, the project site is relatively level grassy area. One boring was advanced to 26.5 feet below existing ground surface. The boring revealed 3 to 6 inches of duff, sod, and topsoil, mantling loose, silty, fine to medium sand with some coarse sand and gravel. Below these surficial soils at a depth of 4.5 feet below ground surface, dense silty, fine sand with varying degrees of medium to coarse sand and gravel and trace clay was encountered. At a depth of 22 feet below ground surface the soils transitioned to very dense silty fine to medium sand with some coarse sand and gravel, which extended to the termination depth. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 3-4 feet. As no groundwater was encountered in the upper 1.5 feet no dewatering is anticipated. However, if groundwater is encountered, then an internal system of ditches, sump holes, and pumps would be utilized to temporarily dewater the excavations. It is anticipated that approximately 570 cubic feet of soil will be removed for the construction of the proposed monopole I structure and associated equipment cabinets. The applicant has indicated that the potential for erosion during project construction is minimal. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended Policy Nexus: N/A ercrpt_ TmobileMonopole.doc City of Renton PIB/PW Departme1 T-MOB!LE MONOPOLE KENNl £ Em'ironmental Review Committee StajJRepon LUA06-l 73, CU-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 29, 2007 Page3 of 4 2. Air/Noise Impacts: During project construction, on-site emissions will consist of fugitive dust and emissions from construction equipment. There impacts are anticipated to be minor and largely confined near the site. Short-term noise from construction equipment would occur between 7:00 AM and 5:00 PM. The equipment and construction of this project will meet federal, state, and local emissions and noise requirements; therefore no further mitigation is recommended. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended Nexus: N/A 3. Transportation Impacts: It is anticipated that the proposal would result in 1 trip attributable to the project each month for technical service. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended Nexus: N/A D. COMMENTS OF RE.VIE.WING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental I Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Notes to Applicant. _x_ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. __ Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 19, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations Planning 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 am and 8:00 pm, Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between 9:00 am and 8:00 pm. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. Plan Review -Water 1. The project needs to maintain a 15-foot separation from the existing water main. 2. The contractor shall call for utilities locate before any excavation near the water line. 3. A concern is stray currents damaging the water main. ercrpt_ TrnobileMonopole.doc City qf Renton P!B/PW Departmen T-MOBILE MONOPOLE KENNY REPORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 29, 2007 Plan Review -Sanitary Sewer Environmental Review Committee Staff Report LUA06-l 73, CU-A, ECF Page4 o/4 1. The project needs to maintain a 10-foot separation from the existing sanitary sewer main. Plan Review -General 1. T-Mobile has a current Franchise Agreement with the City. 2. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to the City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. All civil engineering plans shall be tied into a minimum of two of the City of Renton current Horizontal and Vertical Control network. 4. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. ercrpt_ TmobileMonopole.doc / J .. ·" ----,. ·;, M • ----· ·-----.... --1····· • ··'\\~: .... ~t;::· .....•........ ······ -···-... i 11·iv/:EJ -.. ;,• .:;._ \ I \' \ I/ -. '"1-1--.0.---~ w-++-!-----+ -! . Ji ''_;~' -~' -' -'~-. ,· ....... -·· ' ... • ___ ·· .. ·· ·-> .. I ------,~ --- \ \ \ ~\ I j \ i \ . -~ / ! '! I H! - I 1 1 • • : 1 ; " " " ! • I I ! I I ! ! I I i l ! I l ' ~ ! •ro ~ ~ ai I : ; 1 ; . ! I I I j ! i I ! ' $ ~ - ·1 I Iii - . j!I ~~ "~ j~lli um -.. ~~h~ -,!ij 1111:!, ,.ii!< ~ ;~dig ~:~a '-- \ ( --_ _.; ' ' I • X I X I X I X I --x_ -; I X I X I X ... • ... ~'-Wf-#i#lt Coverage AFTER SE02545 Kennydale Ii Indoor Coverage [] In Car Coverage ii Poor/Outdoor Coverage [] No Coverage ~ Existing Site II Proposed Site .,, .. ~-~ ' S,te 1 rJ . • . ,.ft.,; 02$0)8< r;],~ ._{~[< ;;:>~SEC /LJ ·.~;;:/ .. ~~--,t;;t:i:~ KE!l.1.JYDALE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON, WA 98065 EX1STING#1 FROM INTERSECTION OF MEADOW AVE N & N 24TH ST LOOKING $0UTH 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 KE~,,YDALE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON, WA 98065 PROPOSED #1 FROM INTERSECTION OF MEADOW AVE N & N 24TH ST LOOKING spiJrTH 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 " KENNYDALE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVDN RENTON, WA 98065 EX/ST/NG#2 FROM EAST SIDE OF 405 FREEWA'\tOOKING SOUTH-WEST 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL. WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 KEt,,,.JYDALE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVDN RENTON, WA 98065 PROPOSED#2 FROM EAST SIDE OF 405 FREE;;WAy;,;.ooKING SOUTH-WEST -.-. ,•-., • t. 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N . ,t BOTHELL. WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 KE1'.,,JYDALE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON, WA 98065 EXISTING#3 FROM EAST SIDE OF 405 Ff<,~.EWi4LOOKING WEST ;((. . .,..,.., 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 :~ :1~~ ~ i~~ .. . :Ji-t :itL ... ·t . ;.- ' ' - .~ .. ~--- ' K!:: .. .,YDALE SE2545A 1400 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N RENTON. WA 98065 PROPOSED#3 FROM EAST SIDE OF 405 FRE~W~'4.00KING WEST 19807 NORTH CREEK PKWY N BOTHELL. WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 ~ ZONING ~ = TBCHNJCAL ID.VICIS C4 · 32 T24N RSE W 1/2 R-8 N 28th St N 24th St. R-8 E4 • 8 T23N R5E W 1/2 ----Renton Clty Llmlta co µCl m lz R~B I O:'.'. "' Q) :> < [/) Q) ~ 0 >---, R-8 IA E NE 2 z ~~-~; "1 RC S m NE 4t I '-'--'-R~S_. ______,' f 90 0 20° "'0° 1~00 D4 5 T23N R5E W 1/2 SJ05 201 NG MAP BOOK 74 92 93 455 ( B 456 82 83 8 26 T24N R4E 25 T24N A4E 30T~4N RSf :t,9 T24N R 28·J24N ASE 45.8 8.1 1 C1 94W 455W C2 ,c3 35 l24N R4E 36 T24N R4E 31 T24N R5E 307 1-'KEWA ,,,908 ' >309 03 \\D4 ',:;3N'fl5E 306 [)t 2 T23N R4E re(:).£ i1 ~N A4E,_-··-· ',;>; 1 T N:R4E, S-T23N R5E: 325', 326. 'f 1\\-c .~~ .. · · ,~i' ~;i3N. ~4-E. '\ 1ii'r23N f:14E 328 ·3 .. ;: :~:f 4 · .310 'f5 18T23N.R5E 334 .··· \;335 336 . . ' G1 ·, t32· ,3_T23N A4E ·24 T2 I R4E 44 607 608 i 6,;1Q J 2 Ji~?~ ~a.J= .. ,~ ,·Js 22N R4E f·r22N R4E 6 T22N RSE. t 5 f22N· FiSE 4 r22'~ fi5E B£5JllMITIAL ymm USE CENTER @] Cent.er Village 459 i 86---g7 ,.~u,<,.,IID. i . 27 T24N ASE · ,. 26 T24N ASE 460 801 b7 8~0 8111 .tffis1· ~ 14123N BSE . 8)5\. __ ;._ 816 !e35---.. G7· 22 T23N RSE 23T23N ASE 820. 821 825 02s:·· .. ·· -.-. ',.,_.,,_, \ · 1a··'. ' . ·-" ' . r1 ,34 T23N ASE 35 T23N R5E 632 ' 833 Js· J7 '3 T22N R$E 2 T22N ASE lNDllSTRlAL ~ ReBourtie Con,,ervation ~ Re,,id,mtial 1 du/1u; ~ Re8idomtlal 4 du/ac ~ Residential 8 du/ac luc-Nl I Urban Center -Noi-lh 1 ~ Urban Centei--Noi-lh 2 0 center Downtown• ~ IDduetrial -Heavy CE] IDdu"trial -Medium 0 Industrial -U,11:hl (P) Publicly O'll'D8'd ~ ReeldenUal Manufactured Homn ~ Residentl.al 10 du/ac ~ R!!eldentlal 14 du/ac I RM-Fl Rnidential Multi-Family ~ Commei-clel/Office/Residential COMMERCIAi ----Renton City Limits __ Adjacent C:ity Llm.:ib -Book Pagu Boundar, E 8 ,, 36 1 T2 0 Commercial Arterial• [§J Commercial Office• 0 Commercie.1 Neighborhood KROU . ... /.--~· PAGE-jRM-Tj Rnldentlal Uulu-Famlly Tradilional IRH-U \ Rnidential Mutu-Famlly Urban Center' • May include Overlay Di.tricb. See Appendi.i:: maps. For additional rl!1ulationB in Over)By Diatricts, please see RMC -4-3. PAGE# INDEX Print&d by Prin! & Mail ~-City of Renlon DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDI~G/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM January 18, 2007 Jill Ding Amela Henninger X7298 KENNYDALE MONOPOLE (WCF) APPLICATION LUA 06-173 WEST OF 1-405 AND E OF 2219 MEADOW A VE N IN WSDOT ROW -------------------~-~--~~- ] have completed my review on the request for T-Mobile's proposed SE2545 Kennydale WCF application located in Section 5, Township 23N, Range 5 E and have the following comments. Existing Water --There is an existing 16" water main in this area. Located adjacent is a 2" PVC telemetry conduit. Sanitary --There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main on the north side of the adjacent parcel to the south. Storm --There are not any existing storm drainage facilities in this area. This project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. REQUIREMENTS: WATER: • The City of Renton Fire Marshal did not have any comments on this project. • The project needs to maintain a 15' separation from the existing water main. • The contractor shall call for utilities locate before any excavation near the water line. • A concern is stray currents damaging the watermain. SANITARY SEWER: • The project needs to maintain a IO' separation from the existing sanitary sewer main. GENERAL: • T -Mobile has a current Franchise Agreement with the City. • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. • All civil engineering plans shall be tied into a minimum of two of the City of Renton current Horizontal and Vertical Control network. • Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. cc: Kayrcn K. City -· .. enton Department of Planning I Building I Pu_ _ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: APPLICATION NO: LUA06-173, CU-A, ECF APPLICANT: T-Mobile USA PROJECT TITLE: T-Mobile Mono SITE AREA: 600 s uare feet LOCATION: E of 2219 Meadow Ave N, within WSDOT R-0-W COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2007 DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5. 2007 PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding PLAN REVIEW: Arneta Hennin er BUILDING AREA ross : N/A WORK ORDER NO: 77707 RECEIVED JAN 4H 2007 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the installation of a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure and assoicated equipment cabinets. The project site is approximately 600 square feet of WSDOT right-of-way. Access to the project site would be provided off of Meadow Avenue N. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major lnformat1on Impacts Impacts Necessary Eat1h Housinn - A,r Aesthetics Water LiahVGJare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transnortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Natural Resources Historic/Cultural Preservation Airporl Environment 10,000 Feel 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS City ... enton Department of Planning I Building I Pu_ .. , Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ir 0 ,,s~oi f;,:/,7,r, COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-173, CU-A, ~CF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5, 2007 . APPLICANT: T-Mobile USA ' PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dina PROJECT TITLE: T-Mobile Monooole -Kennvdale PLAN REVIEW: Amela Henninaer SITE AREA: 600 square feet BUILDING AREA /nross): N/A LOCATION: E of 2219 Meadow Ave N, within WSDOT R-0-W WORK ORDER NO: 77707 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the installation of a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure and assoicated equipment cabinets. The project site is approximately 600 square feet of WSDOT nght-of-way. Access to the project site would be provided off of Meadow Avenue N A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinn A,c Aesthetics Water LiohVG/are Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans-f10rtation Environmental Health . Public Se,vices Energy/ Natural Resources Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have re ·ewed this application with particular attention to /hose areas in which we have expertise and have 1dentlf1ed areas of probable 1moncl 01 areas where dditional information is eded to properly assess tins proposal. /6 {) 7 Date i City enton Department of Planning I Building I Pu_ .. c Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: . .s ''I•.' ,, ,L; '· COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-173, CU-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5, 2007 APPLICANT: T-Mobile USA PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dina PROJECT TITLE: T-Mobile Monooole -Kennvdale PLAN REVIEW: Arneta Henninoer SITE AREA: 600 sauare feet BUILDING AREA lnross\: N/A LOCATION: E of 2219 Meadow Ave N, within WSDOT R-0-W WORK ORDER NO: 77707 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the installation of-a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure and assoicated equipment cabinets. The project site is approximately 600 square feet of WSDOT right-of-way. Access to the project site would be provided off of Meadow Avenue N. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housino Air Aesthetics Water Linht!Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transoorlation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistondCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where af/ditional information is nee ed to properly assess rhis proposal. Date City lenton Department of Planning I Building I Pu. Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: A,rfJo<4i COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2007 APPLICATION NO LUA06-173, CU-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5, 2007 APPLICANT: T-Mobile USA ' PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dinq PROJECT TITLE: T-Mobi/e Monopole -Kennydale PLAN REVIEW: Ameta Henninqer SITE AREA: 600 sauare feet BUILDING AREA laross): NIA LOCATION: E of 2219 Meadow Ave N, within WSDOT R-0-W I WORK ORDER NO: 77707 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval and Environmental (SEPAi Review for the installation of a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure and assoicated equipment cabinets. The pro1ect site ,s approximately 600 square feet of WSDOT right-of-way. Access to the project site would be provided off of Meadow Avenue N. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Clement of the ProbabJe Probable More Environment Minar Major Information Impacts Impacts NeC(!5Sary Envjronment Minor Major Information Jmpacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina A" Aesthetics Water LightlGl.sre Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline use utilities Anima!s Transoortarkm Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natura) Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS with partfcular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or n is needed to properly assess this proposaf. ~, ·. , ..... Date jl City of Renton Department of Planning! Building I Pu.Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pa. r L;5 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-173, CU-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5, 2007 APPLICANT: T-Mobile USA PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dino CITY'-·-·. .. PROJECT TITLE: T-Mobile Monooole -Kennvdale PLAN REVIEW: Arneta Henninoer M E c; E I VE 0 SITE AREA: 600 square feet BUILDING AREA tnross): NIA JAN ! 7 · "n7 LOCATION: E of 2219 Meadow Ave N, within WSDOT R-0-W WORK ORDER NO: 77707 D111, ,... .• SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant 1s requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the installation of a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure and assoicated equipment cabinets The project site is approximately 600 square feetof WSOOT right-of-way. Access to tt,e project site would be provided off of Meadow Avenue N A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impact~ fmpacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housir/n Air Aesthetics Water U,..ht!G/are Plants Recreation Umd!Shore!ine Use UtiMies Animals Trans""rtation Environmental Health Public SeNices Energy! Historic/Cultural NatuMI Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feel B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE:.-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to /hose areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probabft1 ,mpuct ur areas where a ditional information · eded to properly assess this proposal. . / : ,/. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative City..,, .. enton Department of Planning I Building I Puc .. c Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 19, 2007 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-173, CU-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 5, 2007 APPLICANT: T-Mabile USA PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Dina PROJECT TITLE: T-Mobile Monooole -Kennvdale PLAN REVIEW: Arneta Henni= SITE AREA: 600 sauare feet BUILDING AREA lnrossl: NIA ; LOCATION: E of 2219 Meadow Ave N, within WSDOT R-0-W WORK ORDER NO: 77707 . SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval arJi4:Nivim,nnE9/lro(SEPA) Review for the installation of a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure and assoicated equipment cabinets. The prOJevc!t site 1s approximately 600 square feet of WSDOT right-of-way. Access to the project site would be provided off of Meadow Avenue N. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary ' Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinn Air Aesthetics Water LirfhVGfare Plants Recreation Land!Shoref/ne Use Utilities Animals Transnortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Natural Resources Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS . 'Nr> (?' R J:Je( 7 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) LAND USE NUMBER: LUA00-173. Ci.J-A. ECF PROJECT NAME· T-Mobf~ Man,,~ale -Kennydale PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tt-e apo ,cant 1s requesting Acrr1rns:rat ve Con(l1tklnal Use Perr· 11 a aero, a ~r Env1·onme1•.al :SEPAi Rescev: fo, :t·,e ,os:allat,on of a 5S-'oot I 1-,~ch Mooopol~ ' struclurn a"d ass~ catcc cqv r,n1e~ cao1nels The proiec\ site 1s approx1fl'alely GOO 5cuare 'eel of WSDOT ,cgt,\.n/-way Access tc tre po1c:\ s1:c ,,,_;dj t, pro·;ioed off of Meade" ".venue N PROJECT LOCATION: Eas:o/2219 MNdaw Aw, 'j w1lh1n WSDCT R 0-W OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNSI: t,s the Lead Agency. the City cf Rw1 " 1,ac; cc1ew11c• Iha! s1grnf1cart env,ronrr,cnlal 1rrpacts are unlikely to ,esLlt from tie proposed pro1ec\ Therefore. as n~er :1, RCW 43 21C 110. the Cit'/ of Re~\on 15 usir>g lhe Optoonal DNS process to give notice that a DNS ,, Ir; LE s<uej Comment periods for the pro1ec1 and the prop"sea DNS are mte9ra:eo ,rte a s-ngle oorrmenl pe11~,I a~~ comment per,od fcllo,.,1rg the ,ssua~ce cf \he Tl1reshold Determ,nat,on cf Non-S,gr1l1caoce \D:,.JS, 14-.1a1 a~ce· penod w,11 follOII' t~e issuance of :he DNS PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 26. 2006 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: .anuary 5 2007 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Michael Slotemaker, Wlreloss Facll1tles. Inc; Tel: 1206) 214-8954; Eml: m1chael.slotemaker@slinel.com Permlt1/Rev1ew Requested: Envlronmental lSEPA) Review. Administrative Cond1Mnol Use Permit Other Permits wh,ch may be required. Building Permit Requeeted Studies: Accoustlcal Report, Radio Frequence Analysis, Geotechnical Report, Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic E~posure Analys,~ Location where application may be reviewed· Plannlng1Building/Pub1Lc Works Department. Development Services Division. SIKlh Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: N.'A CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: En,ironmen\31 {SEPAi Checklist Ni.lo. Comments on the above apphcs,uon must be subm,tted ,n wrot:r,y lo J1I. Ding Senior Planner, Development Serv,ces D1v1s1o1 1055 Solilh Graoy Way. Renton WA 98055 ty 5.0C PM on Januar1 19. 2007. If sou ha,e Questio·18 about this r,roposal. or w,sti lo be made a party of record and receive add1t1onal not1l1cat1on by maf. ·con I act t~,c Pro1ect ManJger ~~;~~~l;',;~o subr,1ls il'ri\ten commMts w,11 automatn::ally become a party of recorcl and will be no\1f1ed of an) d<cc,s,an an CONTACT PERSON: Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner; Tel (425) 430-7219; Eml: jding@ci.renton.wa.us PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALL1NG FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION SITE ' " ill • JI II you would like to be made a party of record to rece,ve further information on th,s proposed proJect. complete th,s iorm and return to· City of Renton. Development Planning 1055 So Grady Way. Renton, WA 98055 NameiF1le No T-Mob,le Monopole -Kennydale/LUA06-173 CU-A ECF NAME MAILING ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO CERTIFICATION /'_ _3 ,l~~..._ .. ,\.\\\~\ilJ I, S'em cq/£.iSEg_ , hereby certify that copies of the above do~":.·1.:~':'-~, were posted by me in __2_ conspicuous places or nearby the described prope~ ~!):-',.", , '..i'~t~~11 1~ ~ =J.0 i?l-1c· ,;._ DATE: I-S---t71-SIGNED: ~~ '? t,-i'f:;; ,.· ~)-~ % ) 7-; ~ : ~ ~ !');' ~!.,} f.i .:~:: A ITEST: Subscribed and sworn before me. a Notary Public, m and for the State of Washington res1d1iit~~'7,_ ·~ IS:\..\,... ~OE I "1 '.',,,,<·•~-~$'",';'- "")'~~"";,"~ ~"'" ~'--" d ~ l~k ,,.~ NOTARYPUBlJCSIGNAT CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 5th day of January, 2007, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, NOA, Environmental Checklist, & PMT's documents. This information was sent to: Name Agencies Surrounding Property Owners WSDOT -c/o Mark Eldridge Michael Slotemaker (Signature of Sender):· _fad ,ju,/( . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) See Attached See Attached Owner Applicant I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker Reoresentina signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: \, f, -0-1 , Notary (Print): My appointment expires: Project Name: T-Mobile Monopole -Kennydale Project Number: LUA06-173, CU-A, ECF template . affidavit of service by mailing ------ Dept. of Ecology • Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING {ERC DETERMINATIONS) ------- WDFW -Stewart Reinbold • Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 3190 160'h Ave SE 39015 -172"' Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 . , WSDOT Northwest Region • Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program • Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calver1 King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172°' Avenue SE PO Box 33031 0 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers• KC Wastewater Treatment Division ... Office of Archaeology & Historic Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation'* 1 ~~nB~;~~3~;;iewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer ' 201 S. Jackson ST. MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olvmoia, WA 98504-8343 Jamey Taylor• Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olvmoia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72"' Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal L1ason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, _\'VA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology Real Estate Services NW Regional Office Title Examiner 3190 150•·, Avenue SE 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue. WA 98008-5452 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 ·- Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. • Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERG Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing I I I i 334450029007 ABBEY VINCENT H D EXECUTOR 9005 21ST AVE NW SEATTLE WA 98117 334450023000 MALETTA DON 1509 N 24TH RENTON WA 98056 052305903909 BRE PROPERTIES INC ATTN: PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMEN 525 MARKET ST #4TH FL SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 334450023406 MULLINAUX MICHAEL G 1415 N 24TH RENTON WA 98056 334450023505 HOLMA NANCY E 1409 N 24TH RENTON WA 98056 334450025005 STORK MICHAEL R+BARBARA J 2219 MEADOW AVE N RENTON WA 98056 113, NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS} DATE: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: January 5. 2007 LUA06-173 CU-A '.'::CF T-Mob1le Monopole -Kennydale PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant 1s requesting Administrative Conditional Use Permit approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the installation of a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure and assoicated equipment cabinets. The project site 1s approximately 600 square feet of WSDOT right-of-way. Access to the proJect site would be provided off of Meadow Avenue N PROJECT LOCATION: East of 2219 Meadow Ave N, within WSDOT R-0-W OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project Therefore. as permitted under the RCW 43 21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). A 14-day appeal period wil! follow the issuance of the DNS PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 28, 2006 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January 5, 2007 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Michael Slotemaker, Wireless Facilities, Inc.; Tel: (206) 214-8954; Eml: michael.slotemaker@sfinet.com Permits/Review Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Conditional Use Permit Other Permits which may be required: Building Permit Requested Studies: Accoustical Report, Radio Frequence Analysis, Geotechnical Report, Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Exposure Analysis Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Planning/Building/Public Works Department, Development Services Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 N/A N/A Environmental (SEPA) Checklist N/A Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jill Ding, Senior Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on January 19, 2007. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project CONTACT PERSON: Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner; Tel (425) 430-7219; Eml: jding@ci.renton.wa.us PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION f t l It' -- 't., .•. ' ' . -. -.w ~ If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Name/File No.: T-Mobile Monopole -Kennydale/LUA06-173, CU-A, ECF NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO : <~y 0 ·~. CIT OF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator 0~AE>~ ~-i;': Kathy Kcolkcr, Mayor ~N~o,;,r-------------------------~ January 5, 2007 Michael Slotemaker Wireless Facilities, Inc. 575 Andover Park W #201 Tukwila, WA 98188 Subject: T-Mobile Monopole -Kennydale LUA06-173, CU-A, ECF Dear Mr. Slotemaker: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on January 29, 2007. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions. Sincerely, /1 '1{ 12 / / . I, I . L ).} i O -~u- K. Ding Senior Planner cc: WSDOT c/o Mark Eldridge / Owner -------10_5_5-So_u_th_G_ra_dy_W_a_y--R-e-n-t,-m-, ,-V-a,-h-in-g-to_n_9_8_05_7 _______ ~ ~ AHEAD OF THE CURVE '+a.I This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 206.214.8954; michael.slotemaker@wfinet.com NAME: Washington Dept of Transportation C/0 Mark Eldridge PROJECT INFORMATION ADDRESS: 310 Maple Park Ave SE PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: SE02545B Kennyda\&/WSDOT r -:foS ·-r -H,,,oU,l ., ,.,M ~--", I CITY: Olympia ZIP: 98501 PROJECTIADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: South East of property at 2219 Meadow Ave N, Renton, WA TELEPHONE NUMBER: 360.705.7314 98065 (;.J ,-lw (l f-'-100 V "1 i.-J APPLICANT (if other than owner) KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): None. WSDOT R.0.W. has no APN. NAME: Michael Slotemaker EXISTING LAND USE(S): Part of 1-405 R.0.W. COMPANY (if applicable): T-Mobile USA PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Construct and operate ADDRESS: 19807 North Creek PKWY N unmanned wireless communication facility in R.O.W. CITY: Bothell ZIP: 98011 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: None. WSDOT R.O.W. has no designation. TELEPHONE NUMBER 206.214.8954 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): None. WSDOT R.0.W. has no designation. CONT ACT PERSON EXISTING ZONING: WSDOT R.O.W. -No marked zone NAME: Michael Slotemaker PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): Same as above COMPANY (if applicable): Wireless Facilities, Inc SITE AREA (in square feet): 600 sqft SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE ADDRESS: 575 Andover Park W, Ste 201 DEDICATED: 0 sqft SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: CITY: Tukwila ZIP: 98188 0 sqft PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): Not Applicable Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planning/masterapp.doc 12/27/06 r p JECT INFORMATION cont NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): Not NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE Applicable NEW PROJECT (if applicable): Not Applicable NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): Not PROJECT VALUE: $85,000 Applicable IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE Not Applicable SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE BUILDINGS (if applicable): Not Applicable arAQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): Not Applicable 0 FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL 0 GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. BUILDINGS (if applicable): 0 sqft 0 HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL 0 SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): Not Applicable NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if 0 WETLANDS sq. ft. applicable): O sqft LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal descriotion on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION _05_, TOWNSHIP _23_, RANGE_05_, IN THE ---- CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. ACUP ICO.l';)., 3. ~ 2. SEPA :u::,o 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ /, ~ '00 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP t, (Print Name/s) Michael Slotemaker, declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or _X_ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that }\,( 'l"(,"ll, '1>)il'<U\/\}.V4 ~ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the ./?" ~ ~ uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. LL4a/i~~ (Signature of Owner/Representative) \ (~ -----\ . :~v~ ~~-" v~ Notary Public in and for the State of W ... ~••••••-wwWMM~ (Signature of Owner/Representative) Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/planning/mastcrapp.doc 2 12/27/06 _ ROJECT INFORMATION (contin __ J) Notary (Print) \~~ ( '\ \ l...],,,t.. ~\-\ d.,~ .. P My appointment expires: Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planning/masterapp.doc 3 12127/06 Washington State Department of Transportation Douglas 8. MacDonald Secretary of Transpon.at1on November 30, 2006 TO: City of Renton, Planning Examiner Transportation Building 310 Maple Park Avenue S.E PO Box 47300 Olymp,a, WA 98504-7300 360-705-7000 TIY: 1-800-833-6388 www.wsdot.wa.gov RE: 1-90, Washington State Department of Transportation site: SR 405 Kennydale Hill Vicinity. T-Mobile. By: Mark Eldridge, WSDOT Wireless Lease Program Manager Proposed Site Location; SR 405 Kenny<lale Hill Vicinity. The Washington State Department ofTransportaiton has been requested by the above named wireless communications provider to consider leasing a portion of state owned right of way for a communications facility. This letter is being provided to assist in initiating any permitting process as requested by the local jurisdiction. It is anticipated that, upon a successful lease application review by WSDOT, a wireless communication lease would be forthcoming. However, WSDOT makes no guarantee of same and does not agree to assume any liability, obligation or responsibility to pay any fees that might be associated with the permitting process. Many local jurisdictions include language in their Affidavit of Ownership documents that make requirements of WSDOT that are either illegal, or inconsistent with our business practices. In order to meet the needs of contractors wishing to do work within the State Right ofWay the attached WSDOT Affidavit of Ownership was created to meet their need. Thank you for your understanding, Sincerely, /~~- Mark Eldnoge Wireless Lease Program Manager Real Estate Services Office PO Box 47338 Olympia, WA 98504-7338 360-705-7314 Fax: 360-705-6811 eldridm@wsdot.wa.gov I, Mike Pala=, Deputy Director, Real Estate Services Washington State Depar1ment of Transportation hereby certify that the State of Washington is the property owner of record and possess the full legal authority and rights necessary to exercise control over the property descnbed as SR 405 in King County, Washington I am authorizing T-Mobile USA, to apply for building permits for additional improvements on this site only. This authorization shall be valid for 180 days from the execution of this document. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State ofW ashington that the foregoing is true and correct. Washington State Depar1ment of Transportation 310 Maple Park Ave. NE Olympia, WA 98504 Deputy Director, Real Estate Services STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF THURSTON ) ) ss ) On this ~ o day of November, 2006 before me personally appeared Mike Palazzo, to me known to be the duly appointed Deputy Director. Real Estate Services, and that he executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said State of Washington, for the uses and purposes therein set forth, and on oath states that he was authorized to execute said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the 25th day of July, 2006. Mark Eldridge (Print or type name) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at: Olympia, WA My commission expires: 12-13-2009 . ·, DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CIT v OF ;{ENT ON PLANNING/BU : ~ ;:: ' T1 ::; /PUB LI C \VO R KS MEti\JORANDUM November 1-L 2006 Jill Ding Amela Henninger X7298 KENNYDALE MONOPOLE (WCF) PREAPPLICATION PRE 06-129 WEST OF 1-405 AND S OF MEADOW A VEN I have completed my review on the request for T-Mobile's proposed SE2545 Kennydale WCF application located in Section 5, Township 23N, Range 5 E and have the following comments. Existing • Water --There is an existing 16" water main on this site. Located adjacent is a 2" PVC telemetry conduit. • Sanitary --There is an existing 8"sanitary sewer main on the north side of this parcel. • Storm --There are not any existing storm drainage facilities in this area. • This project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. REQUIREMENTS: WATER: • The City of Renton Fire Marshal did not have any comments on this project. • The project needs to maintain a 15' separation from the existing water main. • The contractor shall call for utilities locate before any excavation near the water line. • A concern is stray currents damaging the watermain. • SANITARY SEWER: • The project needs to maintain a IO' separation from the existing sanitary sewer main. GENERAL: • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. T mobile Monopole Prcpplicatio Page 2 All civil engineering plans shall be tied into a minimum of two of the City of Renton current Horizontal and Vertical Control network. • Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 bnt less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. cc: Kayren K. l:\Projects\KENNYDALEMONOPOLEPA.doc\cor DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: C'.T' ill= RENTON Planning1Buiiding/Public Works MEMORANDUM November 16, 2006 Pre-Application File No. 06-129 Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner, x 7219 Kennydale Monopole General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50, plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Project Proposal: The subject property is located at the south end of the terminus of Meadow Avenue N and is west of 1-405 (parcel no. 0523059039) and is located within the Residential Multi- Family (RM-F) zoning designation. The proposal is to install a new 60-foot tall monopole on the northeastern portion of the project site. The monopole would be located within a 20-foot by 30- foot fenced lease area and would accommodate ground equipment for the applicant and a future wireless provider. The fenced area would be surrounded by a 15-foot vegetated sight obscuring buffer. The proposed monopole would include a shroud that would completely enclose all antennas and coaxial cable, which would be less obtrusive visually. The monopole would be painted a green color to further aid in the monopole blending in with the surrounding trees. j Zoning: The subject property is located within the Residential Multi-Family (RM-F) zoning designation. The proposed wireless support structure meets the definition of a "Monopole II" per RMC 4-11-230, however if the height of the monopole were reduced by 1 inch, the structure would meet the definition of a "Monopole I". The Monopole I may be permitted as an Administrative Conditional use permit if the structure is a minimum of 100 feet from any adjacent residential zone, otherwise a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use 'permit is require. A Monopole II may be permitted as a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use provided the structure is more than 300 feet from a residentially zoned property. Development Standards: All wireless communications facilities are subject to the development standards specified under RMC section 4-4-140 as well as the RM-F zoning designation as discussed below: Height -The maximum permitted height for a Monopole I is less than 60 feet for all zones. Macro facilities are the "tallest" attachment allowed on a Monopole I. which could be an additional 15 feet above the monopole. Micro and mini facilities are also permitted to be located on the monopole. A Monopole II structure is permitted a maximum height of 70 feet in the RM-F zone. ' Color -Depending on which type of facility is used micro. mini or macro facilities are required to be the same color as the support structure or existing building to which it is attached. Landscapinq/Scr~eninq -When equipment shelters or cabinets can not be located in a building or underground, they shall be fenced screened, and landscaped in conformance with RMC 4-4-070, Kennydale Monopole Pre-Application Meeting Page 2 of 3 Landscaping. Landscaping shall include a minimum 15-foot sight obscuring landscape buffer around the accessory equipment facility. Screening details shall be provided at the time of formal land use application. If the landscape plan proposes to install 100 percent drought tolerant vegetation, then an underground spripkler system is not required. Setbacks -The required setbacks in the RM-F zone are 20 feet in front, 15 feet in the rear, and 12 feet along interior side yards. To be reviewed· as an Administrative Conditional Use Permit Monopole I structures shall be setback a minimum of 100 feet from adjacent residentially zoned properties, otherwise a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit would be required. Monopole II structures shall be setback a minimum of 300 feet from adjacent residentially zoned properties. If the height of the proposed structure were reduced by 1 inch, then the proposed monopole would meet the City's definition of a Monopole I and would be reviewed as an Administrative Conditional Use Permit as the structure would be setback 100 feet from an adjacent residential zone. If the height were maintained, the proposed Monopole II structure would not be permitted on the project site as the structure could not be located more than 300 feet from a residentially zoned property. ( Sensitive Areas: According to the City's critical areas maps, the project site contains protected slopes (slopes with a grade greater than 40 percent). A geotechnical analysis for the site is required and must be prepared by a licensed geotechnical engineer. The analysis needs to assess soil conditions and detail construction measures to assure building stability. r 1 Environmental Review: The proposed personal wireless service facility would be located within a resideniial zone, therefore the project is subject to Environmental (SEPA) Review. Permit Requirements: The proposal would require approval of an Administrative Conditional Use permit and Environmental Review. The review process would be completed in an estimated time frame of 6-8 weeks once a complete application is accepted. The application fee for the Administrative Conditional Use would be $1,000 with Y, off of subsequent applications. The Environmental Review Fee is dependen\ on project valuation: project value less than $100,000 is a $200 fee (1/2 of $400.00 full fee) and project value over $100,000 is a $500.00 fee (1/2 of $1000.00 full fee). Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is providid in the attached handquts ) if; 7l l"ZA.,b 4 cvf 1 l,000 In addition to the required land use permits, separate construction, and building permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits, but cannot be issued prior to the completion of any appeal periods. Conditional Use Criteria: In order to obtain approval of a conditional use and expansion of the conditional use, the proposal must satisfy specific criteria. The purpose of a conditional use permit is to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited. The evaluation of the proposed use must be deemed consistent with other existing and potential uses within the general area of the site. ~t is the applicant's responsibility to adequately demonstrate the facts justifying the approval of the conditional use permit based on the use's compatibility with ALL of the following criteria (RMC section 4-9-030G): • • • • • • • • • • • Comprehensive Plan Community Need ., Effect on Adj','cent Properties, including lot coverage, yards and height Compatibility Parking · Traffic Noise, Glare Landscaping Accessory Uses Conversion Public Improvements V JJ'fJ r f.._., , L.,_..," r,, r ,J,.J ' Kennydale Monopole Pre-Application Meeting Page 3 of 3 The criteria listed above must be c:e2;1y ~,,::! ,:,oroughly substantiated. Staff examines the existing uses located adjacent to ,re suoject site when evaluating the conditional use criteria. it is the burden of the applicant to demonstrate tnat this site is appropriate for the use proposed. It is important to note that staff is only able to make a recommendation and that the Hearing Examiner makes the final decision for a conditional use permit. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review. cc: Jennifer Henning :r ~1R-8. R~8 • • C4. 32 T24NI R5E re~I H 25th l'l R-8 I .. · R-'-8 R-8 N 28th St R-"-8 R-8 °' I °' z E4 • 8 T23N R5E W 1/2 ----Rento11o City Llmli. ~ ZONING ~ = TECHNICAL SERV1CB8 ·-----~ 0 2yo "00 1:4800 --R-8 . In "" .. t ____ . : ~ --: N . r.., iNE2~ i [ 1:1 ___ j_' t,j RC 5 90 D4 5 T23N R5E W 1/2 SJOS . ' Master Application Form• :®§n@oo~itl@Iin~iti1~11i m§/11!11t111111 1111 1 ii1ii111 Neighborhood Detail Map 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section PROJECT NAME: '.::E lS-L/ \ i{.e.,,,-,ych.l.__ DATE: \\ /1Y/0G 4. Development Planning Section NAIVER. OP SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS :.:-oR LANO USE APPLICATIONS :.§filil~~~~fimt.i~(f~t.ff.i-tffi}i§fil1~~&1!t&&fillt;J~*~!&fi111i?r.~ifl! Rehabilitation Plan 4 Street Profiles 2 Topography Map, Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft , AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions ,AND, Map of View Area 2 AND, Photosimulations 2 AND, fhis requirement may be waivefd by: 1. Property Services Section 1. Public Works Plan Review Section l. Building Section L Development Planning Section PROJECT NAME: _ _:S,,_· l_c_:.)c_.:,_· '-1..:....:..C_k_e "-~-1-f.:ce,,[,.=L._::s_ __ DATE: ____ i~I /'-'-1---''1/'-'o_l ____ _ SE2545 Kennydale Proof of Authorization Attached is the cover page and the signature page of the contract between Wireless Facilities, Inc. (WFI) and Voicestream PCS III (which is now T-Mobile USA) showing that WFI has been hired to perform services for T-Mobile USA. ' . ' Independent Contractor Agreement THIS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into on September 15, 2005 (the "Effective Date"), by and between Wireless Facilities, Inc. Federal Identification Number l 3-3818604 ("Contractor"), and the following affiliates or subsidiaries of T -Mobile USA, Inc. (individually and collectively, subject to the provisions of Section 24, below, the ("Company"): Voicestream PCS III Corporation and Voicestream PV/SS PCS, L.P. The Company desires to engage Contractor to perform the Services (as defined below), and Contractor desires to provide the Services. Therefore, the Company and the Contractor (collectively, the "Parties") agree as follows: I. Services. The Company hereby engages Contractor as an independent contractor to provide the services which are generally described in Exhibit A attached hereto (hereafter the "Services") in the PCS markets being developed by the Company. Contractor shall only provide Services when requested in writing by Company. Contractor acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement does not (a) require Company to use the Services of Contractor, or (b) give Contractor any exclusive rights to perform such Services for or on behalf of Company. 2. Relationship Between the Parties. Contractor shall be acting as an independent contractor to the Company, and nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to create a relationship of employer-employee, common Jaw employee, principal-agent, partner, or joint venture between Contractor and the Company. Neither party has any authority to bind the other to any contract or agreement without the other's written permission. Contractor shall operate an independent business consistent with the Company's business and agrees to be responsible for all of Contractor's federal and state and local taxes, withholding, social security, insurance, and other benefits. Upon request, Contractor shall provide the Company with satisfactory proof of independent contractor status (including without limitation applicable business licenses). Contractor further warrants that in the event the Internal Revenue Service or any other state or local agency determines that Contractor is a common law employee of the Company and therefore subject to withholding and payroll taxes (e.g., federal income tax, FICA, FUTA, etc.), Contractor shall fully indemnify the Company for all such withholding and payroll taxes, and associated interest and penalties, if any, assessed against the Company in connection with such determination. Contractor further warrants that in the event that the Internal Revenue Service or any other state or local agency determines that Contractor is a common law employee of Company, Contractor shall take no steps whatsoever, and shall forbear from seeking to recover, retroactively or otherwise, any benefits that the Company provides to its regular employees, including, without limitation, any entitlement to participate in the Company's stock option bonus or purchase and/or other plans, and/or its 40I(K) plan and/or other profit sharing and/or pension plans. Contractor agrees not to participate directly or indirectly in any litigation or claim of any nature whatsoever seeking to recover any benefits from the Company. Contractor agrees to fully indemnify, defend, or hold harmless the Company against any such claim by anyone on Contractor's behalf. Version 1-1.3-04 • • legal theory, to proceed jointly against more than one of the Companies identified in the first paragraph of this Agreement. IN WITNESS HEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date and year written above. CONTRACTOR: Title: Version 1-13-04 COMPANY: Voicestream PCS III Corporation and Voicestream PV/SSPCS~L.. Name:~~ By: ~,,_._,-1-; I '{o.. l,,..,,);;,,,._ Title: D,Nc.tor of &~~,\e,er,~<>.J\a ~ws Legal Approval 8 Applicant Agreement Statement for SE02545A Kennydale I, Michael Cady, Zoning Supervisor for T-Mobile, the applicant, agree to the following: a. The applicant agrees to allow for the potential collocation of additional wireless communication facility providers on the applicant's structure or within the same site location; and b. That the applicant agrees to remove the facility within six (6) months after that site's use is discontinued or if the facility falls into disrepair, and restore the site to its pre-existing condition. If there are two (2) or more users of a single wireless communication facility (WCF), then this provision shall not become effective until all users cease using the WCF. Zoning Supe T-Mobile 1 C) -+I., D I Subscribed and sworn to before me, this-~~-----day of eu ... o R,., [Notary Seal:] ---' " Notary Publk: Sta1e of Washington , MOlAEL S. SLOTEMAKER My Appcintrnent Expi,es March I . 2009 Michael S. Slotemaker NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: vVl ~'" k , 20_Q_i_. , 2006. f Project Narrative for T-Mobile's Proposed Site: SE02545B Kennydale T-Mobile is proposing to install a 59'-l 1" Monopole I, as defined in RMC 4.11.230, and associated ground equipment on the western side of the Washington State Department of Transportation's Right of Way for l-405 just south of where Meadow Ave N. ends. The nearest address is 2219 Meadow Ave N., which belongs to a residential parcel that is northwest of the proposed site. The proposed Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) will consist of a 20'x30' leased area that will be able to accommodate the multi-carrier monopole and the associated ground equipment for at least two wireless providers (the applicant, T-Mobile, plus one future provider). The necessary permits needed for the proposed monopole I and mini-facility located in a R.0.W. are based on sections 4.2.080A AD45 stating that a Monopole I in a ROW "May be allowed via an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Right of Way Use Permit." Based on this section, the applicant will be applying for an ACUP from the City of Renton, and a SEPA determination. The applicant will not pursue a Right of Way Use Permit with the City of Renton because the site will be located in the State's ROW for 1- 405, hence, the applicant will instead be actively working with the DOT to acquire all necessary permits and licenses required to construct and operate the proposed WCF. The proposed location is in the DOT R.0.W., which does not have a zoning designation. The property adjacent to the location in the ROW that the applicant is proposing to develop is an undeveloped parcel zoned RM-F. The properties on the east side ofl-405 are zoned R-8, and nearest parcel to the northwest of the proposed site is also zoned R-8. The proposed site is in the 1-405 R.O.W., with a current use of providing a multi-lane thoroughfare for a large volume of traffic. The specific area of the R.O.W. that we will be placing the proposed WCF has some minor improvements placed near the site by the WSDOT. The sound wall on the west side ofl-405 that runs along the ridge terminates about 40' north of the site. The only other structure in the R.0.W. near the proposed WCF is a WSDOT traffic cam and associated pole, located about 300' south of the proposed WCF location. The applicant has chosen the specific location in the R.O.W. because of the large level area that would accommodate the proposed WCF while avoiding the steep slopes that exist to the west and the south. There are no wetlands, bodies of water, or other notable special site features in the vicinity of the proposed WCF. The applicant has conducted a Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation at the proposed site. The report goes into detail identifying the various soils encountered at a variety of depths. A majority of the soil types that exist at the site are described as silty, fine sand and gravel, which increases in density (or compactness) as the depth increases. Some traces of clay were encountered at a depth of 4.5-feet bgs. Boring ceased at 26.5 ft bgs. The soil drains well and due to the relatively small area of the project, no permanent drainage control measures will be installed. There will, however, be temporary erosion control • measures and devises installed and maintained during the construction phase, as described in detail in the Targeted Drainage Plan submitted with this application package. The proposed use of the property will remain the same, as a primary north-south transportation route to relieve pressure from I-5, servicing the eastside of the greater Seattle area. The scope of the proposed WCF is fairly small in comparison to the use and overall size of the subject R.O. W., but I will describe the specifics of the proposed site design. The monopole will have a drilled concrete pier foundation that will go to a depth of-20' below grade (specifics for the foundation will be determined by the tower manufacturer and supplied with the building permit submittal). A 20'x 30' area will be leveled, compacted, and have course crushed gravel placed on top to provide a stable work surface around the base of the monopole. The applicant will pour a 1 O'x 15' concrete slab where the radio cabinets, back-up power cabinets, and other auxiliary equipment will be placed. A 6' chain link fence with three runs of barbed wire fence will enclose the 20'x 30' equipment area. On the north side of the compound, a IO' landscaping buffer will be installed, with a 4' wide gravel path going down the west side of the compound to Meadow Ave N. to provide a safe walking route for the technicians. The site will be accessed via Meadow Ave N. which leads directly up to the access gate to the DOT R.O.W. Once construction is complete, the WCF will require about one visit per month, so no improvements or new roads are needed to support the proposed project. Other then brining in power and telephone service lines (via underground conduits) from a transformer and telco pedestal located about 440' north on Meadow Ave N., the applicant is not proposing any off-site improvements. No water or sewer service will be needed for this proposed project. The proposed project will have a total value of around $85,000 which includes construction costs and materials. The applicant is unable to determine "fair market cost", as a WCF is specifically designed for, and work in conjunction with, an existing network for a particular service provider. Additionally, there is currently no existing open market for the sale and purchase of individual sites belonging to licensed service providers, hence the applicant's inability to detennine a fair value for this proposed WCF. The proposed project will remove about 570 sqft of soil and haul to an approved off site soil depositing location. Other then the material removal stated above, the applicant is not proposing to bring in, or remove, any additional material to the site. The proposed project location was specifically chosen to maximize the use of existing trees for screening. No trees will be removed for the proposed project. No land will be dedicated to the City as a result of this project. Due to the small size of the project and the quick duration (about 2 weeks), their will be no job shacks, sales . -. trailers, or model homes associated with this project. A portable toilet will be present at the site during the construction phase. ' Conditional Use Pen11it Ju:-: 0 ::-.:'::n Nan-ative for T-Mohile's Proposed SE2545 l(cn,1vd;Jc Site. T-Mohile, in the following statements. will sel forth the reasons why the City of Renton should favor this application by addressing the reasons to support this proposal based on sections ofRMC and criteria used by the reviewing official. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed WCF will be in compliance and meet all design criteria set forth in the RMC 4-2-060.P, 4-2-080.A Item 45, and section 4-4-140 regarding WCFs. T-Mobile chose the specific location based on several area conditions that would assist in screening the tower and the ground equipment, making it blend in better with the surrounding trees and vegetation while also being able to provide a quality coverage to the customers that commute along I-405 and the residents east ofl-405 on the south side ofKennydale hill. The City ofRenton's goals for WCFs are to encourage locating towers in non-residential areas and to minimize the total number of towers in the community, encourage multi- tenant structures, encourage the placement/design ofWCFs to minimize adverse impacts to the community, primarily visual, and allow for wireless providers to enhance the ability of their network services to the community quickly, effectively, and efficiently. T-Mobile's proposed WCF was designed to meet the City's goals. The proposed site, while being east of a RM-F zone, is located near a vacant parcel owned by BRE Properties, which through conversations with them, they have no intent of developing in the foreseeable future due to the slopes and shape of the parcel. To the east of the site is I-405, which as an existing use, which is the main reason for the applicant's need for a site in this particular location. The proposed site's location in the State's Right of Way was also chosen to move the site as far way from the private residence located to the northwest of the site. T-Mobile's Site Characteristics The compatibility of a WCF's specific characteristics is often hard to gauge, as their signals and services are utilized in all locations, regardless of zones, jurisdictional boundaries, and desired plans. But T-.\.1obile agrees that some locations make more sense than others, and has placed this site in a location that they believe will maximize the use of existing geographical features and mature vegetation to limit the local aesthetic impact for local citizen's and commuters. The size, placement, and design features proposed for this site will make it less visible than the existing WCF sites located near the Arco Station at Exit 6 on I-405 and the other WCF that are located at the south end of the hill near Exit 5 on I-405, both locations that the applicant also has existing WCF operating. Unlike these nearby sites, the proposed WCF will have flush mounted antennas, be painted a dark green to match the existing mature evergreen trees in the area, and be only 59' -11" tall, making it the shorter then the towers located near the base and ' the top ofKennydale hill. All of the g•·o,m'.i cc,uipment and a majority of the monopoie will be screened from the public· s vi cw ,1v the following vegetation: an existing row of 20'-40' tress of mixed species that a;·e e,cst of the site between 1-405 and the site; dense shrubs, blackbeny bushes, and mature evergreen that are south of the site; the 15' greenbelt that sunounds the entire parcel to the west (APN# 052305-9039-09. Article 7 of "Declaration of Covenants, Conditions. Easements & Restrictions Applicable to the Bluffs, A Residential Community", recording #20020211002618), and a 10' landscaping buffer that will be installed on the nonh side of the WCF to provide a visual screen from individuals driving down Meadow Ave N. The proposed WCF will not create an increase in traffic along Meadow Ave N, as the average site requires only one visit per month by a technician who uses a standard pick- up truck, and visits the site during norn1al business hours. The proposed WCF will also not create any glare, as the monopole will be painted with a non-reflective dark green paint, as well as any attached antennas. A noise report was done for this site by SSA, an acoustical consultant firm, with the results stating that the possible noise produced by the cabinets during peak operation times could exceed the 45dBA limit set by RMC for the nearest property line, which lies 20' to the west, so a sound barrier will be installed per their directions. Please note that while the nearest property line is 20' to the west, the nearest residence is 280' away to the nmihwest, and with the ambient noise level at the site being 78.5 dBA, primarily from 1-405, the likelihood of any community members being negatively affected by the WCF is very small, if any at all. Community Need I-Mobile chose the area of the proposed location based on a number of factors that pointed to the need for a WCF in this location, but there are also larger system-wide improvements that take place as well by the addition of site to the network, such as E91 l. A primary reason this site location was chosen is because of an existing area of very weak coverage in the applicant's network. Attached is a printout of field-generated coverage data gathered by driving a vehicle containing specialized equipment that measures the signal strength of the network (RF -Exhibit A). As you can see on the map, the middle part ofl-405 along south Kennydale hill, as well as several square blocks of residential areas to the east of 1-405, show areas of yellow, red, and grey, all indicating a medium to significant loss in signal strength, which can result in failed or dropped calls. The red star on the map represents the location we are proposing to place the WCF, and the larger clusters of grey triangles represent the applicant's existing WCF in the area. As is clearly shown, the two existing sites do not provide acceptable coverage to the middle part of the hill and to residents on the eastern part of Kennydale Hill; hence the applicant's chosen location to fill in the gap. RF -Exhibit B & Care images produced by a planning program that forecasts a WCF's ability to provide coverage to an area based on a number of variable, such as antenna elevation, antenna azimuth & down tilt, topography, natural features (large bodies of water, heavily forested, etc), and other more technical variances. • RF --Exhibit B shows what the planni,1g r:d represents as the current coverage. which if you compare it to RF -Exhibit A y:1u wdl notice that it is very accurate. Please note that the red square labeled SE02545r i, where the WCF is proposed to be located. RF- Exhibit C represents the improved cm ernge that will be provided by the proposed site at 59' -1 l ". Note the improved coverage area along 1-405, east of 1-405 in the High Ave NE area, and to some areas west ofl-405 just n011h and south of the site. By improving the coverage across the entire area, and filling in smaller gaps that exist between existing sites, T-Mobile's network will also improve the ability of residents, visitors, and workers in the City of Renton to utilize their wireless devices for personal, business, and emergency calls. For example, CTIA reports that more then 224,000 emergency calls are made from wireless phones each day, and by improving the overall network the applicant is improving the ability for distressed citizens to contact emergency services and the ability of emergency personnel to locate those citizens. T-Mobile's radio frequency engineers have produced a document that goes into greater detail regarding the specifics of determining the need for a site in this location. Please reference the attached document titled, ··Radio Frequency Engineer Site Analysis" for this information. Effect on Adjacent Properties T-Mobile is very aware that WCFs placed in residential type areas can often cause concern within the community. As part of a national effort to take a proactive step in working with communities and concerned citizens before a site is submitted for permitting, the applicant held an Open House meeting. The purpose of the meeting was to allow individuals in the surrounding area an opportunity to review the proposed plan, talk to RF engineers, Site Acquisition Specialists, Zoning Specialist, comment on the design, make suggestions for alternative locations, and provide other feedback or show support for the proposed WCF. T-Mobile mailed out 34 notices to ail property owners within 400' of the boundary of parcel #20020211002618 and passed out 180 notices to the residences of Pinnacle at Lake Washington Apartments. The notices were delivered about two weeks before the scheduled event on November 9'\ and contained general information regarding the WCF's location, contact information, and the time and location for the Open House. I received one call prior to the Open House, from a nearby property owner who was interested in renting his land in the event that our current location did not work out, and only one individual stopped by during the scheduled meeting; she was a resident of the apartment complex. Her two questions; would this site improve her husband's phone service, and what would the tower look Jike 9 We informed her that since her husbar~c ·s phone was for a different provider, the proposed WCF wornd not help iniriaiiv. lw, c::uid be a collocation option for that provider in the future. As for the look o 1· tt1c site. she was pleased to sec that the antennas were flush mounted and that the tower was p,inted green and placed in the trees. We received no other complaints or comments 11bout the proposed WCF from the residents who were sent the notices. Based on the lack of community response. even from residents living along High Ave l\E and Jones Ave NE who might be able to see the top of the tower from their homes, we are confident that the community does not view the proposed WCF as having the potential to result in substantial or undue adverse effects on their properties. Additionally, due to the existence of 1-405 and the large negative effects it has on surrounding properties, any perceived negative visual or acoustic effects would be miniscule in scale when compared to the adjacent highway. Construction Mitigation Description for SE2545 Kennydale The overall timeframe for constructing a new WCF is usually less then 2 weeks from first breaking soil to final punch walk. The construction start date would be about 2 weeks after receiving all applicable permits, and based on the ACUP, BP, and WSDOT timeframes, we are planning on a construction start date of April 2, 2007 and a finish date of April 13, 2007. Construction will take place during normal business hours, typically between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m., Monday thru Friday. The proposed site location is only accessible via Meadow Ave N, so the proposed route from 1-405 will be as follows: Exit 6, heading west on N 30th St Left (South) onto Park Ave N Left (East) onto N 28'h St Right (South) onto Meadow Ave N Proposed site and end of Meadow Ave N. The scale of the project is relatively small, with large vehicles only being required at the site on three separate occasions; I. drill rig for drilling the tower foundation hole, 2. the cement truck to poor cement for the foundation and equipment slab, and 3. the truck w/ boom required to bring in the monopole pieces and lift them into place. Aside from these three instances, the traffic to the site during the construction phase will be non-CDL type commercial trucks (I-ton or smaller). Since the site is near the end of a paved road, and a service road of a compact dirt/gravel extends south from Meadow Ave N., T-Mobile is not anticipating any significant problems with mud, dust, and erosion, so no special measures will be implemented at this site. Vehicular traffic will usually consist of 4-6 vehicle/trips a day, the result of which will not have any very little impact on the surrounding residents, so no traffic control plans have been produced for this proposed WCF. If, in the even a crane will be needed, T-Mobile will work directly with the FAA to obtain any necessary permits or approvals. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you, The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. C:\Documents and Settings\michael.slotemaker.WFINET\My Documents\T-Mobile\'06 Build\SE 2545 Kennydale\Zoning\SE2545B SEPA Checklist.doc12/27/06 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable SE02545B Kennydale/WSDOT 2. Name of applicant: T-Mobile USA 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: T-Mobile USA. 19807 North Creek Parkway N, Bothell, WA 98011 Contact Person: Michael Slotemaker -Wireless Facilities, Inc 575 Andover Park West, Suite 201, Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: 206.214.8954 Email: michael.slotemaker@wfinet.com 4. Date checklist prepared: 12.20.06 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Applicant plans to start construction upon receipt of all required permits and approvals. Overall construction timeline will be about 2 weeks from start to finish. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. However, Applicant is receptive to requests from other wireless operators to locate their antenna systems on its tower, subject to engineering approval and procurement of appropriate ground leases, master use agreements, land use permits and building permits that may be required. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Applicant has requested third-party environmental analysis. Third-party geo-technical analysis will be performed. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No, the applicant is not aware of any other pending approvals for the subject property. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Administrative Conditional Use Permit, SEPA. Building Permit, FAA approval, and FCC License (already granted to Applicant). C:\Documents and Settings\michael.slotemaker.WFINET\My Documents\T-Mobile\'06 Build\SE 2545 Kennydale\Zoning\SE25458 SEPA Checklist.doc 2 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The applicant is proposing to construct and operate an unmanned wireless communication facility consisting of a 59'-11" monopole that will be able to accommodate multiple wireless providers, enclosed within a 20'x30' fenced compound where the monopole and associated radio equipment will be located. The applicant is proposing to place 1 O' of landscaping on the north portion of the compound as well as improve an existing dirt/gravel path from the south end of Meadow Ave N to the proposed fenced area. C:\Documents and Settings\michael.slotemaker.WFINET\My Documents\T-Mobile\'06 Build\SE 2545 Kennydale\Zoning\SE2545B SEPA Checklist.doc 3 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposed location for the wireless communication facility will be in WSDOT's 1-405 R.O. W on the western side of 1-405 just south of where Meadow Ave N ends. The nearest addressed property is 2219 Meadow Ave N, which lies to the northwest of the proposed site. The specific location's coordinates are 47• 30' 41.9" -122• 11" 55.6" (NAO 83). A map and site plan has been attached to the back of this form for reference. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle on@lling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) The proposed construction site is located on flat ground; however, the property does have areas with slopes of approximately 30% to the south and west of the site, but these slopes are over 40' away. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farm land. Silty fine to medium sand with some coarse sand and gravel d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No, the applicant did not notice any unstable soils in the immediate vicinity. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Some minor grading will be required for the concrete pad. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. The probability of erosion occurring as a result of the proposed construction is minimal. However, appropriate erosion control measures will be implemented, as needed. C:IDocuments and Settings\michael.slotemaker.WFINET\My Documents\T-Mobile\'06 Build\SE 2545 Kennydale1Zoning1SE2545B SEPA Checklist.doc 4 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Due to the vast size of the R. 0. W. for 1-405, the applicant is unable to determine the percentage of new impervious surface, but the proposed project will only add 820 sqft of new impervious surface. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Appropriate erosion control measures will be included, as needed. C:\Documents and Settings\michael.slotemaker.WFINET\My Documents\T-Mobile\'06 Build\SE 2545 Kennydale\Zoning\SE25458 SEPA Checklist.doc 5 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction equipment will comply with applicable air quality regulations. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No, to the best of the Applicant's knowledge. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. The proposed facility will meet state-required emissions requirements. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No, not to the applicant's knowledge. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. C:\Documents and Settings\michael.stotemaker.WFINET\My Documents\T-Mobile\'06 Build\SE 2545 Kennydale\Zoning\SE2545B SEPA Checklist.doc 6 b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not Applicable. The site is not staffed, therefore, no water or sanitary sewer service is required. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. As this project will not significantly alter the percentage of impervious surface area. the project will not affect existing runoff patterns. This project will continue to use existing patterns of storm water runoff and retention. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No waste material will be generated from this proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: No permanent measures are planned at this time, however. temporary erosion control measures will be implemented prior to. and throughout, the construction phase. 4. PLANTS a. __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullnush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? About 20 -30 sqft of blackberry bushes will be removed. C:\Documents and Settings\michael.slotemaker.WFINETiMy Documents\T-Mobile\'06 Build\SE 2545 Kennydale\Zoning\SE2545B SEPA Checklist.doc 7 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None, to the best of the applicant's knowledge. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The Applicant is proposing to landscape a 15'x20' area north of the fenced area. The proposed landscaping plan calls for 2 Douglas firs, 2 Western Red Cedars, 3 Pacific Wax Myrtle, 4 Strawberry Tree, and several Kinnickkinnick that will provide ground coverage between the larger plants mentioned above. All proposed plants are native to the northwest and naturally drought resistant. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other~.,_ ____ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other---------- Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other------ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None, to the best of Applicant's knowledge. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Not to the best of Applicant's knowledge. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None are proposed at this time. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether ij will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical and telephone service. The electricity will be used to provide power to the electronic equipment in the shelter. No heat will be needed. Back-up batteries will provide emergency power. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No, the monopole and associated equipment will not affect solar energy use. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH C:\Documents and Settingslmichael.slotemaker.WFINEDMy Documents\T,Mobile\'06 Build\SE 2545 Kennydale1Zoning1SE2545B SEPA Checklist.doc 8 a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. There are no known environmental health hazards which occur as a result of cellular communication facilities. The proposed communication facility operates at extremely low power and at a high radio frequency. All radio frequency emissions are regulated by the Federal Communications Commission. Wireless facilities typically are 1 percent of the ANSI/IEEE standards for health and safety. There will, however, be sealed gell-cell batteries on site, which are enclosed in a locked shelter with secondary containment. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None required. Emergency services and customers which utilize T-Mobile's E- 911 system in the area will be enhanced by the proposed project. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Proposed site will operate at lower power, per operation license. C:\Documents and Settings\michael.slotemaker.WFINET\My Documents\T-Mobile\'06 Build\SE 2545 Kennydale\Zoning\SE2545B SEPA Checklist.doc g b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing noise in the area will not affect this project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Temporary construction noise may be generated during installation of the facility. Construction will be limited to normal daytime working hours. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Increased noise levels due to construction will be restricted to normal business hours to reduce any impacts to residents to the north. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The proposed site is located on in the western portion of DO T's R.O. W. for 1-405 that is currently unused. The property bordering the R. 0. W. to the west is 4+ acres of vacant land belonging to an apartment complex. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No, not to the Applicant's knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. There is a sound wall/barrier to the north of the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The WSDOT R.O. W. does not have any zoning classification. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The WSDOT ROW has no specific designation in the comprehensive plan. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The City of Renton has identified the site as being in an Aquifer Protection Zone 2. C:\Documents and Settings\michael.slotemaker.WFINET\My Documents\T-Mobile\'06 Build\SE 2545 Kennydale\Zoning\SE2545B SEPA Checklist.doc 10 i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed project is designed to meet all applicable code requirements established by the City of Renton's wireless code, even through the proposed project is not technically within the City's jurisdiction as the proposed site is localed on federal properly managed by the state. The proposed WCF will use many tactics to ensure that it's overall visual impact is minimized. The site will utilize mature vegetation that exists to the east, south, and west of the site for screening, as well as add a 15' landscaping buffer on the north side of the facility to screen the ground equipment from individuals traveling along Meadow Ave N. The monopole will be painted a a dark green color (Jasper #6216) to assist in blending the tower in with the surrounding evergreen threes that exist to the east (between 1-405 and the WCF). 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not Applicable. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The proposed monopole will be 59'-11". The proposed monopole will be made from steel. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? C:\Documents and Settings\michael.slotemaker.WFINET\My Documents\T-Mobile\'06 Build\SE 2545 Kennydale\Zoning\SE2545B SEPA Checklist.doc 11 None. A balloon test was conducted at this location at the proposed height of the monopole. The engineer conducting the balloon test then drove to numerous residential roads in the area (Meadow Ave N, High Ave NE, and Jones Ave NE) to take photos and see what views, if any, would be impacted. While some of the residents may be able to notice the monopole next too, or amongst the existing trees to the north, east, and west, the proposed monopole will not interfere with any mountain, water, or territorial views. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The proposed WCF will be painted a dark green color to help it blend in with existing evergreen trees in the vicinity. The antennas for the proposed WCF will be flush mounted to the exterior of the proposed monopole to maintain a slim silhouette and reduce visual bulk. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The applicant is proposing to install a small service light directly above the base station equipment (about 7'-6" above grade) that will be placed on a timer and only used when the site is being serviced at night (usually due to an emergency situation at the site). The light will have a hood that will direct light downward and limit light exposure outside the compound. Unless required by the FAA, the proposed WCF will not have any other lights or signals on the monopole. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No, the proposed monopole will be painted a non-reflective dark green color. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The neighboring apartment complex to the southwest of the site has a small walking trail through the northeastern part of the property. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable. C:\Documents and Settings\michael.slotemaker.WF1NET\My Documents\T·Mobile\'06 Build\SE 2545 Kennydale\Zoning\SE25458 SEPA Checklist.doc 12 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No, not to the best of the applicant's knowledge. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. To the best of the applicant's knowledge, there are no landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed WCF will be located in the 1-405 Right of Way, but will be accessed via an existing gate and service road located at the south end of Meadow Ave N. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The proposed site is not served by public transit. The nearest transit stop is about 0. 5 miles to the north near the intersection of Park Ave N. & N 2gh St. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The proposed project would utilize the existing informal parking area at the end of Meadow Ave N. The proposed project would not eliminate any existing parking spaces. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Once construction of the proposed WCF is complete, the site will be visited, on average, one time a month during regular business hours. C:\Documents and Settings\michael.slotemaker.WFINET\My Documents\T-Mobile\'06 Build\SE 2545 Kennydale\Zoning\SE2545B SEPA Checklist.doc 13 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None are proposed at this time. However, the proposed WCF will improve the applicant's coverage along a heavily traveled section of /-405 and residents in the surrounding area, which will improve their customers' ability to dial 911 from their wireless phone. The addition of this site will also help improve the applicant's existing E911 services in this area. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. No utilities are currently available at the site. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The applicant is proposing to bring in power from a transformer north of the site located at the intersection of N 24 St and Meadow Ave N.. Telephone lines will be brought in from an existing pedestal located on N 24 1 h St. just west of the intersection. Both utilities will be trenched underground along the west side of Meadow Ave N. PSE will be the electricity provider and Qwest will be the telco provider. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Date: C:\Documents and Settings\michael.stotemaker.WFINET\My Documents\T~Mobile\'06 Build\SE 2545 Kennydale\Zoning\SE2545B SEPA Checklist.doc 14 Radio Frequency Engineer Site Analysis T-Mobile Project No.: SE02545A Project Name: Kennydale Project Description: Install and operate a multi-carrier 59' -11" monopole Location: 1-405 R.O.W. near Meadow Ave N, Renton, WA Date: 11/1/06 T-Mobile Site Selection Overview Wireless systems are expanded or introduced in a given area to improve service to customers. There are typically three reasons to add a new facility: extending the coverage to new areas, increasing the capacity of the system within the current service area, or improving quality. Some sites do all three. Coverage: Coverage can be defined as having a certain level of signal strength in a particular area. T-Mobile's target is to provide -76dBm of signal strength to our customers in all areas. This level of coverage guarantees reliable signal strength inside buildings to provide excellent voice quality in residential neighborhoods and commercial areas. In today's competitive marketplace, T-Mobile requires adequate coverage to be competitive and to fulfill our responsibilities under our FCC license. Existing and proposed coverage is demonstrated by use of propagation maps and drive test data. The propagation maps are computer simulations of wireless signal coverage in a given area. One map shows the predicted coverage as it exists without the proposed facility. The other map shows predicted coverage with the proposed facility in place. Drive test data consists of actual wireless signal strength documented in the field by driving through the coverage objective with measurement equipment. Drive test data consists of signal strength measurements collected in the field by driving through the area (coverage objective) which are simultaneously geo-coded with GPS positioning equipment. The data collected can then is printed out on maps the showing coverage throughout the proposed area. Typically, the data collected is aligned with the roads and arterials in the area. Capacity: 1 Capacity is the maximum number of calls that can be handled by a specific site. When we make phone calls, our mobile phones communicate with a nearby site which then connects the caller to land based phone lines or other mobile phones via a T-Mobile switching center. Phone calls occupy very finite radio resources of the serving site. Each site is only able to handle only a limited number of calls. This is in part determined by the number of antennas deployed at the site. When a site is processing its maximum number of calls, the available radio frequency (RF) channels assigned to that site are used up. When this occurs, the wireless phone user will hear a busy signal on his or her phone. The call volume (normally referred to as traffic) of all sites is continuously monitored and analyzed so that overloading (normally referred to as congestion) of sites is prevented. Careful projection allows sufficient lead time to design, permit, and construct the wireless facility prior to exceeding the capacity of surrounding sites. Capacity cell sites are typically required in areas that currently have sufficient coverage. The objective for a capacity site is to handle increased call volume rather than increase the size of a coverage area. Interference: 2 In areas with good coverage, phone calls may still have poor quality which the caller hears as warbled (garbled) voice or in the worst case scenario, experiences a temporary loss of communication. This is often caused by interference. Wireless telephone systems reuse specific radio frequencies at different cell site locations. When frequencies are reused at nearby sites, interference may result. Engineers work to achieve the most efficient use of limited frequency resources and reduce interference. Each mobile carrier (i.e. T-Mobile) is licensed by the FCC to use a very limited amount of spectrum (radio frequencies). This requires the carrier to re-use these frequencies many times over in their Network. Unfortunately, there are still areas where interference is nearly unavoidable. This typically occurs in areas where the coverage from one site is overlapping the coverage of other sites and where this coverage cannot be contained. This can lead to dropped calls, poor audio and is spectrally inefficient (i.e. we are not able to reuse the available frequencies). On a freeway or busy roadway, for example, the network moves the call between different sites, always trying to keep the caller (and the phone) connected to the best site. This ensures god call quality and minimizes the probability of dropping a call. When this overlap occurs, the solution is often to locate a new site as close to the location where the bad handoff or dropped call is occurring. Interference is documented by measuring received call quality (RxQual) during a drive test similar to that performed to measure coverage. RxQual is a measurement of the bit errors on the radio link as the result of interference between adjacent cell sites using the same radio frequencies Site Selection Process for this Location For this project, a coverage gap was determined to exist east of 1-405 bordered generally by NE 27th Street to the north, NE 16th Street to the south, Edmonds Avenue NE to the east and 1-405 to the west. This determination was a result of Network drive test data collected periodically by T- Mobile. A snapshot showing coverage in this area is attached. All areas shown in black, gray and orange have marginal to no coverage with respect to outdoor phone usage. There is a high probability that a phone would not work in-building and this is a primarily a residential area i.e. in-building coverage is very important. Terrain data within the service area is entered into a computer modeling program along with a series of variables, such as proposed antenna height, available radio frequencies and wireless equipment characteristics. From this information the T-Mobile's RF engineers determined an area for the optimum location and height of the Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) antenna to maximize the coverage objective. To provide coverage in that area, it is necessary to locate a facility near the south end of Meadow Ave N, as close to 1-405 as possible. The specific location (or position) of the proposed site has been selected to maximize coverage while minimizing the antenna height requirement. Significant deviation from this location will result in reduced effectiveness, including possible invalidation of the site candidate altogether. The required antenna height is the minimum acceptable to provide the needed coverage with respect to that from neighboring cell sites. Lower antenna height will result in reduced effectiveness, again including possible invalidation of the candidate. In some cases, an increased antenna height is possible which can allow some greater flexibility in location placement. However, too much antenna height is unacceptable as it creates interference conditions that degrade performance of one or more other existing cell sites in the T-Mobile network. When this technical analysis was completed, a search area map and other requirements were provided to T-Mobile's real estate and zoning specialists. With this information in hand, T-Mobile ranked potential sites. Whenever feasible, T-Mobile strives to acquire property that is properly zoned and adjacent to compatible land uses. T-Mobile attempts to select a location that minimizes or limits any negative visual impacts on adjacent or nearby residential areas to the greatest extent possible. Sites adjacent to existing tall power lines, antenna facilities, water treatment facilities, and on the tops of buildings are selected when they meet the other technical requirements of the system. New, freestanding towers are avoided as are locations adjacent to schools, preschools and view corridors or where demolition is required that would be detrimental to the existing character of the neighborhood. Root1op and utility pole applications are favored where the design can be screened or incorporated into the existing structure and mechanical equipment can be placed out of view. 3 After viewing the area, the candidates considered for location, included: I. Several Utility and/or Light poles along Meadow Ave N -No adequate room for ground equipment on adjacent parcels nor enough height allowed per the code. 2. Several Utility and/or Light poles along High Ave NE -No adequate room for ground equipment on adjacent parcels nor enough height allowed per the code 3. The DOT camera pole midway up the south half of the hill. -Access issues, construction issues (slopes, soils, etc), as well as potential problems meeting code requirements for landscaping, setbacks, etc. Eliminated from consideration are sites where zoning ordinances prohibit the location, insufficient room for mechanical equipment is available, required setbacks cannot be achieved or landowners are not interested in leasing property. Two coverage plots are attached. The first demonstrates the existing level of service. The second plot demonstrates the service that will be provided by the new location at a height of 60' feet. A height of 45' will not provide the requisite coverage in the residential areas east ofl-405. It would be difficult at this height to overlap sufficiently with the coverage from adjacent sites i.e. meet the requirements for seamless coverage. The colors on the map indicate the different levels of coverage. The legend of the prediction plot shows several different classes ofbest servers. The various colors of the plot indicate where a T-mobile handset can be reliably used to make and receive telephone calls in the presence of varying receive signals. The terrain, foliage, nearby structures, and WCF location are taken into account. The further the distance from the WCF, or the more abundant the clutter (trees, buildings, etc.) between the WCF and the handset, the weaker the receive signal will be. The following is a short explanation of each server class/ color: Green: Indoor coverage represented by receive signals equal to or greater than -76 dBm Yellow: In-Vehicle and outdoor coverage are represented by receive signals greater than or equal to -84 dBm. White: No coverage or unreliable coverage The various parameters of the model used include terrain and clutter and are modified to more accurately reflect the actual terrain and topography effects of the specific location on the radio coverage predictions. Other factors, not represented on the plot, include the ability of the site to handle the required call capacity or volume of calls and to provide the extent of data and other services required by T-Mobile customers. This site has been designed to provide coverage consistent with these factors. Finally, T-Mobile RF engineers have determined 4 that this height and location 1s necessary for the effective functioning of the minor communication utility. Conclusion T-Mobile engineers have carefully designed this site to maximize quality of service to our customers, which can best be accomplished at a height of59'-11". This location was also selected because of its position relative to existing sites, providing favorable site geometry for federally mandated E911 location accuracy requirements and efficient frequency reuse. Good site geometry is needed to achieve accurate location of mobile users through triangulation with existing and proposed sites. RELATED INFORMATION About T-Mobile's Wireless Network T-Mobile operates the largest all digital, nationwide wireless network based on the globally dominant GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) technology. T- Mobile's entire network has been enhanced to provide customers wireless Internet access and operates the largest carrier owned "Wi-Fi" wireless broadband network in the world with service in over 5000 public locations under the name T-Mobile HotSpot'm. Overview of Wireless Technology Wireless service operates through cellular radio telephone networks, which are comprised of thousands of cell anterma sites, switching facilities and other network elements. All cell antenna sites are radio frequency (RF) transmission towers operating at different frequencies. Each wireless carrier is assigned a very limited amount of frequency, which is divided into certain number of RF channels. RF Channels are assigned to each of the cell sites for communication with our handheld wireless phones. Since the number of channels is very limited, they have to be reused at different cell sites. The problem with reusing RF channels is the potential for interference. When a cell site is using the same RF channel as another cell site nearby this can cause interference. Sometimes when you use a cell phone you may hear a metallic sound or wobbling. This is probably caused by interference. In order to minimize the interference from one site to another site that are using the same RF channel, all cell sites transmit at very low power level. The output of the wireless antenna sites is typically about 20 Watts. The RF emissions from a wireless antenna site are very minimal compared to the output power of other RF equipment. For example, TV antenna towers power output is in excess of 1000 Watts. Due to the low-level power output of wireless antennas, each cell site covers only a very limited area. In order to provide consistent, homogenous, quality wireless service, cell antenna sites is normally 5 less than one mile apart. The exact distance required between cell antenna sites 1s determined by terrain, blockage from structures, call volume and antenna height. How does a wireless antenna work and what is its function? Wireless antennas send and receive radio signals. The RF carries the phone call to or from a wireless base station antenna that then connects your phone with the phone you are calling or with the phone calling you. Engineers carefully design each antenna to make sure it sends signals in precisely the right direction and at the right power level to provide the best calling quality to its coverage zone or "cell area." It is important to note the difference between antennas, towers and base stations. Antennas transmit the RF and are attached to structures such as buildings or towers. The antennas, towers and all of the related equipment make up a cell site. Cells, or coverage areas, come in all sizes -they may be as small as a single building (like an airport or an arena), as large as a rural area of 20 miles across, or any size in between -and each cell has its own base station. When you place a wireless call, your phone uses low-power radio signals to send your voice to an antenna at a base station. The base station sends your call to a switching center where it is connected to the land line phone network and delivered to the phone you called. If you are calling another wireless phone nearby, the switch might just connect you directly to another base station in the cell where the other phone is located. When you approach the boundary of one cell while using your wireless phone, the wireless network senses that the signal is becoming weak and automatically hands off the call to a base station in the next cell and your call continues uninterrupted. An antenna distributes radio waves throughout its cell much like a lamp distributes light throughout a room. A light bulb can provide light evenly throughout a room if it's located in the right place. In the same way, a properly located antenna can provide high- quality calling throughout its cell. That's why they're usually found above the ground on towers, poles, and buildings. Apart from improving service to T-Mobile's existing customer base, T-Mobile has experienced phenomenal growth in the last few years, with an average national customer growth rate of almost 40% per year. It is not unusual for T-Mobile to add more than a million nationwide customers per quarter. T-Mobile forecasts this phenomenal growth to continue. T-Mobile's system design accounts for this predicted growth. 6 ATTACHMENTS Attachment I Existing a proposed coverage plots (RF Exhibits B&C) 7 • I Pj)SSA Stewa,t • AU Allaou:1 • Perkins December 13, 2006 Ms. Maria Bellefeuille T-Mobile 19807 Northcreek Parkway N, Suite 101 Bothell, WA 98011 Re: Acoustical Report -T-Mobile S E2545A Kennydale I WSDOT Site: South of and Adjacent to: 2219 Meadow Avenue North, Renton, WA 98065 Dear Maria, This report presents a noise survey performed in the immediate vicinity of the proposed T- Mobile telecommunications facility south of and adjacent to 2219 Meadow Avenue North in Renton, Washington. This noise survey extends from the proposed equipment to the nearest properties. The purpose of this report is to document the existing conditions and the impacts of the acoustical changes due to the proposed equipment. This report contains data on the existing and predicted noise environments, impact criteria and an evaluation of the predicted sound levels as they relate to the criteria. Code Requirements The site is located within the City of Renton Zoning jurisdiction. The site is on a right-of-way within a Residential zone, and all receiving proper ties are zoned Residential. City of Renton Code Section 8.7.2, Maximum Environmental Noise Levels, adopts by reference Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Sections 173-60-020, 040, 050, and 090. According to WAC 173-60, noise from equipment on a Residential property is limited as follows: Residential Receiver: Noise is limited to 55 dBA during day time hours. During nighttime, defined as the hours between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and between 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. on weekends, the maximum permissible sound level is decreased by 10 decibels to 45 dBA. As this facility is expected to operate 24 hours a day, it must meet the 45 dBA nighttime code limit Ambient Conditions Existing sound levels were measured on site with a Larson-Davis 820 sound level meter on November 21, 2006 to determine ambient sound levels. Measurements were conducted as close to the proposed location as possible and the property lines in accordance with the State of Washington code for Maximum Environmental Noise Levels WAC 173-60-020. The average ambient noise level was 78.5 dBA, dominated by vehicle traffic on 1-405. 222 Etruria··street, Ste 100 Seattle, Washington 98109 t. 206.839.0819 f. 206.839.0824 T-Mobile SE2545A Kennydale / WSDOT Predicted Equipment Sound Levels The proposed equipment includes two Nokia Ultrasite Cabinets 1, one Purcell Power Cabinet', and one Nokia Flexi UMTS Cabinet'. The combined sound pressure level from all of the equipment is 67 dBA at a distance of 3 feet. To predict equipment noise levels at the receiving properties, this survey used the methods established by ARI Standard 275-97. Application factors such as location, height, and reflective surfaces are accounted for in predicting the sound level at the nearest receivers. The equipment is an average distance of 20 feet east of the nearest receiving property line. The predicted sound level at the nearest property is shown below. Table 1 Application Factors and Predicted Noise Levels Proposed New Equipment Line Annlication Factor East 1 Combined Sound Pressure Level at 3 ft. (dBA), Lp1 67 2 Distance Factor (OF) -16 lnverse-Sauare Law {Free Field\: OF= 201oa /d1/d2l /20 ft) 3 Sound Pressure Level at Receiver, Lpr 51 (Add lines 1 and 2) As shown in Table 1, the combined sound pressure level from the proposed equipment cabinets at the nearest receiving property is 51 dBA which does not meet the 45 dBA code limit. In order to meet code, a barrier must be constructed according to the following specifications: Noise Barrier The noise barrier should be located west of the equipment as indicated by the bold line in Figure 1. The top of the noise barrier should be 6'-0" above grade. The noise barrier should be constructed from continuously solid material with a surface weight of 2.5 pounds per square foot (3/4" plywood or 16-gauge sheet-metal meet this requirement). There should be no gaps or joints in the noise barrier. The inside of the noise barrier should be lined between 1' and 6' above grade with sound absorbing Quash rigid foam board QFR 2" thick (available from Doug Bixel, 425.646.9703). This barrier will reduce the noise generated by the equipment to 45 dBA which will meet the 45 dBA code limit. 1 According to manufacturer data, the Nokia Ultrasite Cabinet produces a SPL of 52 dBA at a distance of 3 feet. 2 According to manufacturer data, the Purcell Power Cabinet produces a SPL of 61 dBA at a distance of 3 feet. 3 According to manufacturer data, the Nokia UMTS Cabinet produces a SPL of 65 dBA at a distance of 3 feet. Page 2 . ' T-Mobile SE2545A Kennydale I WSDOT Please contact us if you have any questions or require further information. Sincerely, SSA Acoustics, LLP C_~* Joel Esselstrom Senior Technician Figure 1. :-_r-=u~"-"-""-~ i / Page 3 Alan Burt Acoustical Consultant "' November 28, 2006 Adapt Project :S:o. WA06-I 4398-GEO T -Mobile, USA 19807 North Creek Parkway North, Suite IO I Bothe! I. WA 98011 Attention: Teresa Vanselow Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Kennydale Tower Site (SE2545-J\) Adjacent to 2219 Meadow A venue :S:orth Seattle, WA 981 19 Dear Ms. Vanselow, Adapt Engineering, Inc. 615 Eighth Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98104 Tel (206) 654-7045 Fax (206) 654-7048 www.adaptengr.com Pursuant to your request Adapt Engineering_ Inc. (Adapt) is pleased to submit this report describing our recent geotechnical engineering evaluation for the above-referenced site_ The purpose of this study was to interpret general surface and subsurface sitc conditions. from which we could evaluate the feasibility of the project and formulate design recommendations concerning tower and equipment building foundations, structural fill, and other considerations. Our scope of services consisted of a surface reconnaissance, subsurface explorations, geotechnical anal: ses. and report preparation. Authorization to proceed was given by Ms. Teresa Vanselow ofT-Mohile. CSA (T-Mobile). This report has been prepared for the exclu.sive use of T-Mobile and their agents, for specific application to this project in accordance with generally accepred geotechnical engineering practice. Use or reliance upon this report by a third party is at their own risk. Adapt does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, to such other parties as ro rhc accuracy or completeness of this report or the suitability of its use by such other parties for any purpose whatever, known or unknown, to Adapt. Adapt Engineering, Inc. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance to you, please contact us at ( 206 l 654-7045. Respectfully submitted, Adapt Engineering, Inc. .. · --__;·.-:-:;_~-:--:--:-'7 ,· -~/j~ .. ?~ ~Murray Staff Geotechnical Engineer K. V. Lew. P. Eng. Principal Geotechnical Engineer Senior Reviewer brm/rbh Attachments: Figure l · Location Map T-Mobile. USA Figure 2 · Site & Exploration Plan Boring Log B-l Adapt Project No. WA06-14398-GEO I EXPIRES !!((§t;?;z; • Rolf B. Hyllseth, P.E., L.G. Senior Geotechnical Engineer November 28, 2006 Page2 ~ ·.r4Jl7 ,r4'. ADAPT Adapt Engineering, Inc. 615 Eighth Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98104 Tel (206) 654-7045 Fax (206) 654-7048 www.adaptengr.com T-Mobile, USA Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Kennydale Tower Site SE2545-A Seattle, Washington W A06-14398-GEO November 2006 Adapt Engineering, Inc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The host parcel is located adjacent to 2219 -Meadow Avenue North in Renton, Washington, as shown on the Location/Topographic Map (Figure 1 ). We understand that current development plans call for the construction of a monopole communication tower and associated equipment building or cabinet pad. Specifically, the proposed tower and equipment building lease area is located within dirt and grass covered area at the south end of Meadow A venue ',orth. The tower and equipment building lease areas can be accessed from the south side of Meadow Avenue North. The project site and surrounding area are shown on the attached Site & Exploration Plan (Figure 2). It should be emphasized that the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on our understanding of the currently proposed utilization of the project site, as derived from written and verbal information supplied to us by T-Mobile. Consequently, if any changes are made to the project, we recommend that we review the changes and modify our recommendations, if appropriate, to reflect those changes. EXPLORATORY METHODS We explored surface and subsurface conditions at the project site during a site visit on November 22, 2006. Our surface exploration consisted of a visual site reconnaissance. Our subsurface exploration consisted of advancing one borings (designated 13-1) to a maximum depth of about 26.5-feet below existing ground surface (bgs), within an accessible area near the proposed tower location. The procedures used for subsurface exploration during our site visit are presented in the subsequent sections of this report. The location of the exploration advanced for this study is shown on the attached Figure 2. The specific location and depth of the exploration performed was selected in relation to the proposed site features, under the constraints of budget and site access. The boring location and other features shown on Figure 2 were obtained by hand taping from existing site features; as such, the exploration location shown should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the measuring methods used. It should be realized that the exploration performed for this evaluation reveal subsurface conditions only at discrete locations across the project site and that actual conditions in other areas could vary. Furthermore, the nature and extent of any such variations would not become evident until additional explorations are performed or until construction activities have commenced. If significant variations are observed at the time of construction, we may need to modify our conclusions and recommendations contained in this report to reflect the actual site conditions. Auger Boring Procedures The boring was advanced using a track-mounted. hollow-stem auger drill rig operated by an independent company working under subcontract to Adapt. A geotechnical representative of Adapt was on-site to observe each boring, obtain representatiw soil samples, and log the subsurface conditions. After each boring was completed, the borehole was backfilled with a mixture of soil cuttings and bentonite chips. T-Mobile, USA Adapt Project No. WA06-14398-GEO November 28, 2006 Page 4 Adapt Engineering, Inc. During drilling, soil samples were obtained on 5-foot depth intervals using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) procedure (ASTM: D 1586). This test and sampling method consists of driving a standard 2.0-inch outside diameter (OD) split-barrel sampler a distance of 18 inches into the soil with a 140-pound hammer, free-falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler through each of the three, 6-inch intervals is noted. The total number of blows struck during the final 12 inches of penetration is considered the Standard Penetration Resistance, or "blow count". If 50 or more blows are struck within one 6-inch interval, the driving is cea,cd and the blow count is recorded as 50 blows for the actual number of inches of penetration. The re,ulting Standard Penetration Resistance values provide a measure of the relative density of granular soils or the relative consistency of cohesive soils. The Boring Logs attached to this report describe the various types of soils encountered in each boring, based primarily on visual interpretations made in the field and supported by our subsequent laboratory examination and testing. The logs indicate the approximate depth of the contacts between different soil layers, although these contacts may be gradational or undulating. Where a change in soil type occurred between sampling intervals, we inferred the depth of contact. Our logs also graphically indicate the blow count, sample type, sample number, and approximate depth of each soil sample obtained from the boring, along with any laboratory tests performed on the soil samples. If any groundwater was encountered in the boreholes, the approximate groundwater depths arc depicted on the boring logs. Groundwater depth estimates are typically based on the moisture content of soil samples, the wetted height on the drilling rods, and the water level measured in the borehole after the auger has been extracted. SITE CONDITIONS The following sections describe our observations. measurements, and interpretations concerning surface, soil, groundwater, and seismic conditions at the project site. Surface Conditions The proposed tower and equipment building lease area is located within a bare dirt and grass covered area, which is relatively level. Subsurface Conditions Our borings revealed the near-surface soil conditions to consist of about 3 to 6-inches of duff, sod, and topsoil mantling loose, silty, fine to medium sand with some coarse sand and gravel. Below these surficial soils, at a depth of about 4.5-fcct bgs. our exploration revealed the presence dense, silty, fine sand with varying degrees of medium to coarse sand and gravel and trace clay. At a depth of approximately 22.0-feet bgs, the soils transitioned into very dense, silty fine to medium sand with some coarse sand and gravel, which extended to the full depth explored of about 26.5 ft bgs. Perched groundwater seepage was encountered at approximately 3.0 to 4.0-feet bgs at the time of drilling. Throughout the year, groundwater levels would likely fluctuate in response to changing precipitation patterns, off-site construction activities, and changes in site utilization. T-Mobile, USA Adapt Project No. WA06-14398-GEO November 28, 2006 Page 5 Adapt Engineering, Inc. Seismic Conditions Based on our analysis of subsurface exploration logs and a review of published geologic maps. we interpret the on-site soil conditions to conespond to Site Class C, as defined by Table 1615.1.1 of the 2005 International Building Code (!BC). The soil profile type for this site classification is characterized by very dense soils with an average blowcount greater than 50 within the upper 100 feet bgs. Current (2003) National Seismic Ha:ard Maps prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey indicate that peak bedrock ground acceleration (PGA; NEHRP B-C Boundary) coefficients of about 0.33 and 0.65 are appropriate for earthquakes having a IO-percent and 2-percent probability of exceedance in 50 years (corresponding to return intervals of 475 and 2,475 years). respectively. The IBC mapped spectral accelerations for short periods at the subject site (S,; Site Class B) are I c\5 and 50 (percent of gravity) at 0.2 and 1.0-second periods, respectively. For purposes of seismic site characterization, the observed soil conditions were extrapolated below the exploration termination depth, based on a review of geologic maps and our knowledge of regional geology. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMME'.',DATIO"iS Current development plans call for the construction of a monopole communication tower and associated equipment building or cabinet pad within the proposed lease area. Based on the anticipated subsurface conditions, we recommend that the proposed telecommunication tower be supported on a drilled pier foundation. General design criteria for compressive, uplift and lateral support of a drilled pier are presented below. Our specific recommendations concerning site preparation, equipment building or cabinet foundations, tower foundations. access driveway, and structural fill are presented in the subsequent sections. Site Preparation Preparation of the tower lease area for construction should involve clearing, grubbing, stripping, cutting, filling, dewatering, and subgrade preparation. The following comments and recommendations apply to site preparation. Temporary Drainage: We recommend intercepting and diverting any potential sources of surface or near-surface water within the construction zones before stripping begins. Because the selection of an appropriate drainage system will depend on the water quantity, season, weather conditions, construction sequence, and contractor's methods, final decisions regarding drainage systems are best made in the field at the time of construction. Nonetheless. we anticipate that curbs, berms, or ditches placed along the uphill side of the work areas will adequately intercept surface water runoff. Clearing and Stripping: After surface and near-surface water sources have been controlled, the construction areas should be cleared and stripped of all vegetation, sod, topsoil, and debris. Based on our site exploration and visual observations, we estimate that an average thickness of about 3 to 6-inches of duff, sod and top soil will be encountered across the lease area, but significant variations could exist. It should be realized that if the stripping operation proceeds during wet weather, a generally greater T-Mobile, USA Adapt Project No. WA06-t4398-GEO November 28, 2006 Page 6 Adapt Engineering, Inc. stripping depth might be necessary to remove disturbed, surficial, moisture-sensitive soils; therefore, stripping is best performed during a period of dry weather. Excavations: Site excavations ranging up to about 1.5-feet deep may be required to accommodate the proposed equipment pad footings. Based on our explorations, we anticipate that these excavations will encounter loose, silty sand with some gravel. These surficial soils can likely be cut with conventional earth working equipment such as small dozcrs and trackhoes. Backfill materials, where required, should be placed and compacted according to the recommendations presented in the Structural Fill section of this report. Dewatering: Our subsurface explorations did not encounter groundwater seepage within the upper 1.5- feet; however, depending on the actual excavation depth and the time of year that construction proceeds, the proposed site excavations might encounter perched groundwater seepage. If groundwater is encountered, we anticipate that an internal system of ditches, sump holes, and pumps will be adequate to temporarily dewater the excavations. Subgrade Preparation: Exposed subgracks for shallow footings, mat foundations, slabs-on-grade, roadway sections and other structures should be compacted to a firm, unyielding state, if required to achieve adequate density and warranted by soil moisture conditions. Any localized zones of loose, granular soils observed within a subgrade area should be compacted to a density commensurate with the surrounding soils. In contrast, any uncontrolled fill material or organic, soft, or pumping soils observed within a subgrade should be overexcavated and replaced with a suitable structural fill material. It should also be noted that any previous fill material should be overexcavated and replaced with structural fill if found to contain a significant amount of organics or debris. Frozen Subgrades: If earthwork takes place during freezing conditions, we recommend that all exposed subgrades be allowed to thaw and be recompacted prior to placing subsequent lifts of structural fill. Equipment Building or Cabinet Foundations It is our understanding that the support pad for the proposed equipment building or cabinets will consist of a poured-in-place, concrete slab-on-grade with thickened edges; we recommend that these thickened slab edges be designed as spread footings. Alternatively, the equipment support pad may be designed as a structural slab-on-grade with a uniform thickness and a reduced bearing pressure. In either case, we anticipate that the support pad bearing pressure will be relatively light. The following recommendations and comments are provided for purposes of equipment pad design and construction. Subgrade Conditions: The prepared bearing subgrade soils should consist of loose to medium dense, silty sand with some gravel. Exposed slab-on-grade. footing or overexcavation subgrades should be compacted to a firm, unyielding state, in accordance with the recommendations provided in the Site Preparation section of this report. T-Mobile, USA Adapt Project No. WA06·14398·GEO November 28, 2006 Page 7 Adapt Engineering, Inc. Subgrade Verification: Footings or slabs-on-grade should never be cast atop soft, loose, organic, or frozen soils; nor atop subgrades covered by standing water. A representative from Adapt should be retained to observe the condition of footing subgrades before concrete is poured to verify that they have been adequately prepared. Footing Dimensions: For a poured-m-placc, structurally reinforced concrete slab-on-grade with thickened-edge footings, we recommend that the spread footing elements be constructed to have a minimum width of 12-inches. For frost protection. the footings should penetrate at least 18-inches below the lowest adjacent exterior grades. Bearing Pressure and Lateral Resistance: A maximum allowable static soil bearing pressure of 1,500 pounds per-square-foot (psf) may be used for thickened-edge pad footings designed as described above. For the alternate equipment support pad design using a uniform thickness, structural slab-on-grade, we recommend a maximum allowable static soil bearing pressure of 500 psf across the pad area. These bearing pressure values can be increased by one-third to accommodate transient wind or seismic loads. An allowable base friction coefficient of 0.30 and an allowable passive earth pressure of 280 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), expressed as an equivalent fluid unit weight, may be used for that portion of the foundation embedded more than I-foot below finished exterior subgrade elevation. These lateral resistance values incorporate a minimum safety factor of I .5. Grading and Capping: Final site grades should slope downward away from the structure so that runoff water will flow by gravity to suitable collection points, rather than ponding near the structure. Ideally, the area surrounding the structure should be capped with concrete, asphalt, or compacted low-permeability (silty) soils to reduce surface-water infiltration into the subsoil adjacent to/below the foundation. Settlements: We estimate that total post-construction settlements of properly designed thickened-edge footings bearing on properly prepared subgradcs could approach !-inch, with differential settlements approaching one-half of the total. For a structural slab-on-grade equipment pad with a uniform thickness (without thickened edges), somewhat greater movements may be experienced. Tower Drilled Pier Foundations The subsurface soil and groundwater conditions observed in our site exploration are considered to be generally suitable for the use of a drilled pier foundation to support the proposed tower. The following recommendations and comments are provided for purposes of drilled pier design and construction. End Bearing Capacities: We recommend that the drilled pier penetrate at least 10.0-feet below the ground surface. For vertical compressive soil bearing capacity, we recommend using the unit end bearing capacity presented in Table I below. where B is the diameter of the pier in feet and Dis the depth into the bearing layer in feet. This allowable end bearing capacity includes a minimum safety factor of 1.5. T-Mobile, USA Adapt Pro1ect No. WA06·14398·GEO November 28, 2006 Page 8 Adapt Engineering, Inc. Table 1 Allowable End Bearing Capacity Depth (feet) Allowable Bearing Capacity (tst) Limiting Point Resistance (tst) 10-20 3 .5 Dil3 6.0 20-27 6.0 D/B 10.0 Frictional Capacities: For frictional resistance along the shaft of the drilled piers, acting both downward and in uplift, we recommend using the allowable skin friction value listed in Table 2. We recommend that frictional resistance be neglected in the uppermost I-feet below the ground surface. The allowable skin friction values presented includes a minimum safety factor of 1.5. Table 2 Allowable Skin Friction Capacities Depth (feet) Allowable Skin Friction (tst) 0-2 0.0 2-5 0.1 5-20 0.3 20-27 0.5 Lateral Capacities: Drilled pier foundations for communication monopole towers are typically rigid and act as a pole, which rotates around a fixed point at depth. Although more complex and detailed analyses are available, either the simplified pwsin• mr!h pressure method or the subgrade reaction method is typically used to determine the pier diameter and depth required to resist groundline reaction forces and moments. These methods are described below. T-Mob,le, USA • Passive Earth Pressure Method: The passive earth pressure method is a simplified approach that is general!, used to estimate an allowable lateral load capacity based on soil wedge failure theor1 . Although the lateral deflection associated with the soil wedge failure may be estimated. design lateral deflections using the passive earth pressure method should be considered approximate, due to the simplified nature of the method. According to the NAVFAC Design Manual 7.02 (1986), a lateral deflection equal to about 0.00 I times the pier length would be required to mobilize the allowable passive pressure presented below: higher deflections would mobilize higher passive pressures. Our recommended passive earth pressures for the soil layers encountered at this site are presented in Table 3 and incorporate a safety factor of at least 1.5, which is commonly applied to transient or seismic loading conditions. These values are expressed as equivalent fluid unit weights. which are to be multiplied by the depth (bgs) to reflect the linear increase within the depth interval of the corresponding soil layer. The passive Adapt Project No. WA06-14398-GEO November 28, 2006 Page 9 T-Mobile, USA Adapt Engineering, Inc. earth pressures may be assumed to act over an area measuring two pier diameters wide by up to eight pier diameters deep. Table 3 Allowable Passive Pressures Depth (feet) Allowable Passive Pressure (pct) 0-2 0 " -~-) 280 5-20 390 20-27 420 • Subgrade Reaction Method: The subgrade reaction method is typically used to compute lateral design loads based on allowable lateral deflections. Using this method, the soil reaction pressure (p) on the face of the pier is related to the lateral displacement (y) of the pier by the horizontal subgrade modulus (ki,); this relationship is expressed as p=ki,y. Because soil modulus , alues are based on small scale, beam load test data, and are usually reported as a vertical subgrade modulus (kJ, they must be converted to horizontal subgrade modulus values representative for larger scale applications (such as large pier diameters) by means of various scaling factors, as discussed below. In addition to the scaling and loading orientation. the soil-pier interaction governing k,, is also affected by the soil type, as follows: • SAND and Sol\ CL!\ Y: For cohesionless soils (sand, non-plastic silt) and soft cohesive soils (clay. cohesive silt), the horizontal subgrade modulus (k1,) increases linearly "ith depth (z). This relationship is expressed as k,. = ni,(z/B), where 111, is the coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction and (z/B) is the scaling factor (B is the pier diameter). • Stiff or Hard CLAY: For stiff or hard cohesive soils (clay, cohesive silts), the horizontal subgrade modulus (ki,) is essentially the same as the vertical subgrade modulus (kJ and is considered constant with depth. This relationship rs expressed as k,,=1-.,[ l(ti)/l.5B], where [l(ft)/1.5B] is the scaling factor (B is expressed in feet). Our recommended values for the coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction (111,) and the vertical subgrade modu I us ( k,) for the soil layers encountered at th is site are presented in Table 4 below. These values do not include a factor of safety since they model the relationship between contact pressure and displacement. Therefore, the structural engineer or monopole manufacturer should select an appropriate allowable displacement Adapl Project No WA06-14398-GEO November 28, 2006 Page 1 O Adapt Engineering, Inc. for design, based on the specific requirements of the communication equipment mounted on the tower. Table 4 Recommended Horizontal Subgrade Reaction Values Depth Inteival n" k. (feet) (pci) (pci) 0-2 0 NIA 2-5 5 NIA 5-20 65 NIA 20-27 75 NIA Coefficient of Horizontal k,.= nh(z/B) k,,=k,/(1.SB) Subgrade Reaction (pci) (Sand & Soft Clay) (Stiff Clay) Construction Considerations: Our explorations revealed the site soils to generally consist of loose surficial soils over very dense, silty sand with some gravel. Perched groundwater seepage was encountered al approximately 3.0 to 4.0-feet hgs within our boring at the time of drilling. Dcwatering therefore may be required depending on the actual depth and time of year of drilled pier construction. The foundation-drilling contractor should be prepared to case the excavation to prevent caving and raveling of the pier shaft sidewall, if necessary due to unexpected soil or excessive groundwater seepage conditions. Should heavy groundwater inflow he encountered in the drilled pier excavation, it may be necessary to pump out the accumulated groundwater prior to concrete placement, or to use a tremie tube to place the concrete from the bottom of the drilled pier excavation, thereby displacing the accumulated water during concrete placement. Alternatively. the use of bentonite slurry could be utilized lo stabilize the drilled pier excavation. Drilled Pier Excavation Conditions: The drilling contractor should be prepared to clean out the bottom of the pier excavation if loose soil is observed or suspected, with or without the presence of slurry or groundwater. As a minimum, we recommend that the drilling contractor have a clcanout bucket on site to remove loose soils and/or mud from the bottom of the pier. If groundwater is present and abundant within the pier hole, we recommend that the foundation concrete be tremicd from the bottom of the hole to displace the water and minimize the risk of contaminating the concrete mix. The Drilled Shaft Manual published by the Federal Highway Administration recommends that concrete be placed by tremie methods if more than 3 inches of water has accumulated in the excavation. Access Driveway Based on available site plans and our site reconnaissance visit, it does appear necessary to construct a new access road. We recommend that the subgrade for any access roadway be prepared in accordance with the Site Preparation section of this report. For planning purposes, we anticipate that 6 to 12-inches of ·'clean" sand and gravel subbase material aud minimum 3-inches of crushed rock surfacing will be T-Mobile. USA Adapt Project No. WA06-14398-GEO November 28, 2006 Page 11 Adapt Engineering, Inc. required to create a stable gravel roadway surface at this site. Adapt can provide additional subgrade stabilization or gravel road section recommendations based on observed field conditions at the time of construction. Where cuts and fills are required, they should be accomplished in accordance with the recommendations provided in the Site Preparation and Structural Fill sections of this report. Structural Fill The following comments. recommendations. and conclusions regarding structural fill are provided for design and construction purposes. Materials: Structural fill includes any fill materials placed under footings, pavements, driveways, and other such structures. Typical materials used for structural fill include: clean, well-graded sand and gravel (pit-run); clean sand; crushed rock: controlled-density fill (CDF); lean-mix concrete: and various soil mixtures of silt, sand. and gravel. Recycled concrete, asphalt, and glass, derived from pulverized parent materials may also be used as structural fill. Placement and Compaction: Generally, CDF, and lean-mix concrete Jo not require special placement and compaction procedures. In contrast, pit-run. sand. crushed rock, soil mixtures, and recycled materials should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness, and each lift should be thoroughly compacted with a mechanical compactor. Using the modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM: 0-1557) as a standard, we recommend that structural fill used for various on-site applications be compacted to the following minimum densities: Fill Application Slab/Footing subgrade Roadway subgrade (upper l foot) Roadway subgrade (below I foot) Minimum Compaction 90 percent 95 percent 90 percent Subgrades and Testing: Regardless of location or material, all structural fill should be placed over firm, unyielding subgrade soils. We recommend that a representative from Adapt be retained to observe the condition of subgrade soils before fill placement begins, and to perform a series of in-place density tests during soil fill placement. In this way. the adequacy of soil compaction efforts may be evaluated as earthwork progresses. Fines Content: Soils used for structural fill should not contain individual particles greater than about 6 inches in diameter and should be free of organics, debris, and other deleterious materials. Given these prerequisites, the suitability of soils used for structural fill depends primarily on the grain-size distribution and moisture content of the soils when they are placed. When the "fines" content (that soil fraction passing the U.S. No. 200 Sieve) increases. soils become more sensitive to small changes in moisture content. Soils containing more than about 5 percent fines (by weight) cannot be consistently compacted to a firm, unyielding condition when the moisture content is more than about 2 percentage points above optimum. The near-surface and deeper silty fine sand with vary degrees of gravel should be considered T-Mobile, USA Adapt Pro1ect No. WA06-14398-GEO November 28, 2006 Page 12 Adapt Engineering, Inc. moderately to highly moisture sensitive. The use of "clean" soil is necessary for fill placement during wet-weather site work, or if the in-situ moisture content of the sandy site soils is too high to allow adequate compaction. Clean soils are defined as granular soils that have a fines content of less than 5 percent (by weight) based on the soil fraction passing the U.S. 3/4-inch Sieve. CLOSURE The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based, in part, on the explorations that we performed for this study. If variations in subsurface conditions are discovered during earthwork, we may need to modify this report. The future performance and integrity of the tower foundations will depend largely on proper initial site preparation, drainage, and construction procedures. Monitoring by experienced geotechnical personnel should he considered an integral part of the construction process. We are available to provide geotechnical inspection and testing services during the earthwork and foundation construction phases of the project. If variation.s in the subgrade conditions are observed at that time, we would be able to provide additional geotechnical engineering recommendations, thus minimizing delays as the project develops. We are also available to review preliminary plans and specifications before construction begins. T·Mobile, USA Adapt Pro1ect No. WAD6-14398-GEO November 28, 2006 Page 13 ' :Y--... . \y l .. r . ' I ~OCJ d · ~ JO=_ = .. ;(l)ll ,,f'fAi Prit1 t"ri flnrr rri?n1 .,:,, ·1 n 1:.d 1 .... ., n-:nf.""llp t,r ·i nk"rnf?C.(Lt.'U"Wrop11,~nn ~ Adapt Engineerinfh Inc. 615 -8th Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98104 Te l {206) 654-7045 Fax (206) 654-7048 FIGURE 1 -Location/Topographic Map Project Ke nnyd ale (SE254 5A ) L ocation A dj acen t to 22 19 Meadow A venue North Renton . WA 98065 Client T-Mob1l e U.S A Project No: VVA06 -14398-GEO Date : 11/27/06 \ , LEGEND: ' ~•.1" ')'.,1'.' •,",k.,h,>.Al,...:·•.,•,-c -_,,,..,,,.,c_·_,,..,,.,,n·-,.,,r al ~ ;;!Y , ;, ;::,-,,r, .0 9-1 -$--BORING NUMBER ANO APPROXIMATE LOCATION NOTES: B-1 .. -- DRAWING BASED ON "ENLARGED SITE PLAN" (A-1.1) DRAWING PROVIDED BY T-MOBILE (DATED 11115/06) , .. : ·-:.__,, ' -,--:., . ·--~. _, __ , ____ ;, __ --· -__ __;,.. . ' 0 • ,.,<>·: ... ,.,-• • . ,.,.,,.,: •s,1.i ,.,.:,·.ct..:c .. ,,,~.(·,, -O'(~'C'-""""" ,-i., r-> • .,, .;::~ ,-;~, ";!; " ~..-~. ··" ''"''_,. •. , 10 i-------APPROXIMA ,E SCALE IN ~-~ ,.r ... Adapt Engineering, Inc. 615 • 8th Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98104 FIGURE 2 Site and Exploration Plan ADAPT Tel (206) 654-1045 Fax (206) 654-1048 Project Location Client Project No: Kennydale (SE2545A) Adjacent to 2219 Meadow Avenue North Renton, WA 98065 T-Mobile U.S.A. WAOS-14398-GEO Date: 11/27/06 20 FEET ..,., !lltr -~r4i Adapt Engineering, Inc. BORING LOG ADAPT 615 -8th Avenue South Seattla, Washington 981(}.I. Tel (206) 654-7045 Fax (206) 654-7048 Ground Surface Elevation : NIA Elevation Reference : NIA SOIL DESCRIPTION Project Location Kew1ydale SE2545AJ ,ci.ct1acent to 2219 Meadow Avenue N Rent::in '"."JA 98065 Client --(l.·1001:e U SA Project No : \/,/A06-14398-GEO :: ~ ~ ,r Boring No . 8-1 Page: 01 of 01 LABORATORY TESTING )_ j~ ~3 0 ~~ 0 -+------------------------"-'-"-''-""..j."~"..j."~..j."a.'"-'-----------------------1 Duff, sod and topsoil 5 10 15 20 25 Loose. moist to wet, dark gray, silty fine to medium SAND with some coarse sand and gravel Becoming wet to saturated Dense, moist, tan-gray with some rusty mottling, silty fine to coarse SAND with some gravel and trace clay Dense, moist. tan-gray, silty fine SAND with some medium to coarse sand and gravel Very dense, moist, gray, fine to medium SAND with some coarse sand and gravel Boring terminated @ -26.5-ft bgs Perched groundwater encountered @ -3.0-ft bgs S-t 4 2 3 S-2 9 18 24 S-3 13 19 25 s-4 10 16 20 S-5 14 25 25 S-6 33 40 50 - 301..L------------------------L-L....JL......l-...l--!,0----:,-,,0----,,,,,----,,,,,----,,.,0---..J,!,,----I LEGEND X Sama" oo.S~wacoc MOISTURE CONTENT -,--2-1.1ch O. D. Split-Spaoo Samp,o __j__ [SPT 81owc::ountl JI 3 Y, · 'nch O D Dames & ~oore Sample [Equ1valom SPT Blowcount s~wn1 II Shelby TuM Samp~ ~ Grab Sample (Sa.I Cumngsl Start Date· 11/22/06 _y_ Sia tic Water Ulvel at Time ol Dnll,rg ,m _5;Z_ Stanc WatOM ~elffll "leading DATE "7 Perched Ground<water Comoletion Date ::Ii) 2CJ Wash 1% 1;nes snownJ P!as11c Limit -.._ _______________ _, ~ 3·a,n S1rn ,!,nalys,s ('.\, linas shown) '<=' " Natural Liquid _1m1t Tl/ • TO(IIM8 Raa<:ing ltsl) PP -Pocket Pooto1romat8f Reading ltsf) f'': ~,'·· 1-1;,a of Analy11cal T"511ng P8!fonn9d PID Photo lonizacion Docacro, 1PPMJ SPT -S1anda;d ?,.natrat,on Test " 1 /22/06 Loqqed Bv · R.B.H. C ' JZ27/2006 RES424 Tenant Site Location Right of Way Grow1d In,se Rental Agreement No. (V2) Inventmy Control No. (V3) Tenant's Site Identification AIRSPACE LEASE FOR COMMUNICATION FACILITIES (Ground Rental Only) Revised l 2/27/2006 Ti : : , ;-~ _ ~-'ONTEJ\1TS I. PRE!VUSES ............................................... . . .............................................................................................. I 2. PERI.\UTTED USE................................. .. . ............................................................................................ ' 3. UTILITY IMPROVElWENTS ........................................................................................................................ 2 4. TRAFFIC CONTROL ...................................................................................................................................... 2 5. ACCESS ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 6. PER!VUTS .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 7. NON -NTERFERENCE .................................................................................................................................... 3 7. TERM .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 8. RENEW AL ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 9. CONDEMNATION ........................................................................................................................................... 4 10. TERMINATION BY WSDOT ...................................................................................................................... 4 11. TERMINATION BY TENANT .................................................................................................................... 5 12. RENT ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 13. RENT ADJUSTMENTS ................................................................................................................................. 6 14. CHARGE FOR LATE PAYMENT ............................................................................................................. 6 15. NONAPPLICABILITY OF RELOCATION BENEFITS ..................................................................... 7 16. ENCUMBRANCES ......................................................................................................................................... 7 20. ENVIRONMENT AL LAWS ......................................................................................................................... 7 18. ADVERTISING DEVICES, SIGNS, AND LIGHTING ........................................................................ 9 19. LAWS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS ............................................................................................... 9 20. IMPROVEMENTS, FIXTURES Al\'D PERSONAL PROPERTY .................................................... 9 21. MAINTENANCE. .......................................................................................................................................... 11 22. TENAL'IT'S ACCEPTANCE OF PREl\HSES ........................................................................................ 11 23. RESERVATION OF RIGHT TO MAII\T AI:--1 AND GRANT UTILITY FRANCffiSES AND PERMifS ................................................................................................................................................................ 11 RES424 12/27/2006 24. TA,'(ES. ASSESSMKYrS. AND m· ' . ' • .................................................................................... P 25. LIENS......................................................... . .................................................................................... 12 26. \VS DOT'S RIGHT OF ENTRY A.N : '.;· 0 '~TION .......................................................................... 17 27. INSURANCE. .................................................................................................................................................. 13 28. HOLD HARMLESS, INDEMNIFICATION .......................................................................................... 13 29. NONDISCRIMINATION ............................................................................................................................ 14 30. ASSIGNMENT ................................................................................................................................................ 14 31. PERFORMANCE BY WSDOT ................................................................................................................. 16 32. RESTORATION OF SITE .......................................................................................................................... 16 33. VACATION OF LEASED PREMISES ................................................................................................... 16 34. MODIFICATIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 16 35. W AIYER OF WSDOT'S LIEN RIGHTS ................................................................................................ 16 36. BROKERS' FEES .......................................................................................................................................... 16 37. COOPERATION IN EXECUTION OF SUBSEQUENT DOCUMENTS ..................................... 17 38. INTERPRETATION ..................................................................................................................................... 17 39. INVALID PROVISION ................................................................................................................................ 17 40. TOTALITY OF AGREEMENT ................................................................................................................ 17 41. ATTORNEY FEES ........................................................................................................................................ 17 42. VENUE .............................................................................................................................................................. 17 43. NOTICES .......................................................................................................................................................... 17 RES424 [] 12/27/2006 AIRSPACE LEASE ;sop C.:01,1MUNICATION FACILITIES (Ground Rental Only) This LEASE FOR COMMUJ\ICATIO" FACILITY (11ereinafter Lease) is made this ______ day of _ __ , between the WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (VvSDOT), acting in the capacity of landlord, and _____ (TENANT). WHEREAS, WSDOT owns or has possessory interest in real property depicted on Exhibit A, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, for which the use of a part of said real property for wireless communication purposes has been determined to be compatible with highway operation and maintenance; and WHEREAS, the property to be leased to the TENANT pursuant to this Lease is a portion of the real property shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the premises to be leased by the TENANT are not presently needed for highway purposes; and WHEREAS, the TENANT desires to enter into a sublease with a lessee under -----~ Wireless Communication Lease, RA /IC entered into between ------- WSDOT and on (1icreinafler Master Lease); and WHEREAS, the Master Lease requires a subtenant to enter into a Ground Lease with WSDOT; and WHEREAS, WSDOT is granted authority lo lease the real property under RCW 47.12.120; and NOW, TIIBREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants and performances contained herein, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Premises (Choose one o(the following depending on whether right of wav or a facility is being /ea~ed.) Premises. WSDOT is the owner of property located in the right of way in the County of ------~ State of Washington. A p011ion of the right of way is depicted in Exhibit A attached hereto. WSDOT hereby leases to TENANT and TENANT hereby leases from WSDOT, that portion of the right of way shown hachured on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and as more particularly described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reforence made a part hereof (Premises), together with RES424 12/27/2006 the access 1ights as descrihed in paragrap· . herein. TI1is Lease does not create any estate or transfer any interest in real estate other than the rights srccir,n; l]v described in Exhibit B. Premises. WSDOT is the owner or pronc11v located in the County of _, State of Washington. WSDOT hereby leases to 11:'>iA:~T and TENANT hereby le-JSes from WSDOT, the property shown hachured on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and as more particularly described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference made a pan hereof (Premises) together with the access rights as described in paragraph 5 herein. 2. Pennitted Use. The Premises may be used by TENANT only for the installation, operation, maintenance, upgrading and removal of unstaffed personal communications equipment and related telecommunications activities i<)f which TENANT is legally authorized to provide (Communications Facility). TENANT shall not me the Premises for any other purposes without the prior written consent of WSDOT. The Communication Facility on the Premises shall consist of those items shown on Exhibit C, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof 3. Utility Improvements. A. TENANT shall comply with the WSDOT Utilities Manual and Accommodation Policy set forth at Ch. 468-34 WAC, and any amendments thereto, and follow the current Traffic Control standards at that time. B. (Optional -To be determined by WSDOT Utilities where utilities will be brought to the site) TENANT shall assure that all necessary Franchises and Permits are obtained from WSDOT and maintained for the duration of this lease prior to accessing the premises and shall comply with all terms and conditions contained therein .. 4. Traffic Control. At all times during the term of this Lease, TENANT shall adhere to the Traffic Control Plan attached hereto as Exhibit D and by this reference made a part hereof 5. Access. A. TENANT shall obtain and maintain the appropriate permit prior to accessing the Premises and shall comply with the terms and conditions contained therein. B. TENANT's Access to the Premises shall be at the location(s) indicated on the Access Plan attached hereto as Exhibit E and by this reference made a part hereof C. TENANT may access the Premises at the locations indicated on the attached Access Plan twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week for maintenance and operation of TENANT's Communication Facility; Provided, that TEI\ANT shall notify WSDOT at ------~ or other such person or number as may be designated in writing by WSDOT, prior to such entry; Provided firrther, that in the event of an emergency, such as, but not limited to, road failure, RES424 2 12/27/2006 evacuation, natural disasters, hazardous sel-.star,cc \D'lls, fatal accidents and special events, TENAc'\TT's access may, at il1e Washington State Pan-:11 IY>Sr ·, 11r WSDOT's discretion, be limited or temporarily tern1inated; Provided finther, that any lirnitati0111ternporary termination in TENANT's access shall be restored as soon as the circumstances shall allow. as determined by WSDOT 6. Permits. TENANT shall secure all necessary federal, state and local licenses and pem1its at its sole expense. WSDOT hereby authorizes TENAc"IT to make any and all applications and/or submissions necessary to obtain all licenses and pennits (Government Approvals) from all applicable governmental and/or regulatory entities required for construction of wireless communications facilities on the Premises. To the extent authorized by law, WSDOT agrees to cooperate with TENANT, at no cost to WSDOT other than administrative costs, in the submission and/or processing of any such applications, and agrees to execute any documents, applications, or other submissions required therefore, To the extent authorized by law, WSDOT finther agrees to take no action that will inhibit, impede or delay TENANT's ability to obtain said Governmental Approvals, 7. Non-interference. A. TENANT shall not use the Premises or access areas in any way which materially interferes with the use of the adjacent WSDOT property or WSDOT's authorized use of the Premises, Similarly, WSDOT shall not use, nor shall WSDOT pennit its tenants, employees, or agents to use, any portion of WSDOT's property in any way which materially interferes with the operations ofTENANT authorized by this Lease. Such interference shall be terminated immediately upon notice by the other party. In the event any such interference does not cease promptly, the parties acknowledge that continuing interference may cause irreparable injury and, therefore, the injured party shall have the right to bring an action to enjoin such interference or to tem1inate this Lease immediately upon written notice. B. For the purpose of this Lease, "i nteiterence" is defined in F edcral Communications Commission (FCC) rules and regulations in Title 4 7 CFR, and as may be amended. Further, such interference shall include, but not be limited to, any other use on the Premises that causes electronic or physical interference or obstruction, or degradation ofWSDOT's communications uses and/or radio signals. 8. Term. The tem1 oftliis Lease shall be five (5) years, commencing upon execution of this Lease by WSDOT (Anniversary Date), and terminating at 11:59 p,m. on the last day of the month in which the sixth (6th) Anniversary Date shall have occUJTed. 9. Renewal. This Lease may be renewed by the TENANT for three additional five (5) year periods (Renewal Period); Provided that, (a) the TENANT is not in default and has not been in default during the tem1 of this Lease, and (b) there is no public need for the Premises; (c) TENANT's use under this lease does not impair the safety or operation of WSDOT's highway or facility, as detemlined by WSDOT, and (d) the tenns and conditions of this Lease conform to then existing state policies or practice, RES424 3 12/27/2006 laws. regulations and contracts. or TEI\AJ\-, is l'illing to amend this Lease to b1ing it into compliance with such policies. practices. laws. regulatiorn. :rn1 ccJEtr~crs. TI1e Renewal Period shall be on the same tenns and conditions as set forth herein, except as rnodiiicd by any changes in policy, practice, laws, regulations or contracts and as reflected in a wTitten amendment signed by both pmties. TENAI\T shall give notice of its intent to renew this Lease for the Renewal Pe1iod at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of this Lease, or any extel15ion thereof 10. Condemnation. The Pren1ises shall not be cornidered as part of or as contributing to the use of any adjoining or other properties owned. used, or controlled by the TENANT in the event such other property or property rights of the TENAI\T arc subject to condemnation subsequent to the execution of this Lease. 11. Tennination by WSDOT. A. WSDOT may terminate this Lease, without penalty or further liability as follows: (1) upon fifteen (15) days written notice to TENANT, if TENANT fails to cure a default for payment of mnount~ due under this Lease within that 15-day period; (2) upon thirty (30) days w1itten notice to TENANT, if TENANT defaults, other than non payment of rent, and fails to cure such default within that 30-day period, or such longer period, as may be reasonably determined by WSDOT, if TENANT is diligently working to cure the default; (3) immediately, upon W1i tten notice, if WSDOT is required by court order, by legislative action or by a governmental agency having jurisdiction, to take some action which would effectively prohibit TENANT's use of the Premises; (4) immediately, upon wTitten notice, if a receiver is appointed to take possession of TENANT's assets, the TENANT makes a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, or the TENAI\T becomes insolvent or takes or suffers action w1der tl1e Bankruptcy Act; or (5) upon 180 days notice, unless an emergency exists, as determined by WSDOT, then immediately, ifWSDOT determines that it is in the best interest of the state ofW ashington to terminate this Lease. (6) immediately, upon determination that TENANT does not hold a valid lease from the tenant in the Master Lease covering the Premises. B. Waiver or acceptance of any default of the tenns of this Lease by WSDOT shall not operate as a release of the TENANT's responsibility for any prior or subsequent default. C. If TENANT defaults on any provision in this Lease, such as, but not limited to, the timely payment of rent, three times within a twelve ( 12) month period, then the third default shall be deen1ed "non- curable" and this Lease may be terminated by WSDOT on thirty (30) days notice. RES424 4 12/27/2006 (7) immediately. upon \1ril1L.1 :1otice to TENANT, if TEJ\iA\IT cames mate1ial inteit'erence and fails to cure as provided in i'aragraph 7 herein. 12. Termination by TENANT. A TENANT may terminate this [.ease without penalty or further liability as follows: (I) upon thirty (30) days mitten notice for any reason within the sole discretion of the TENANT; (2) upon thirty (30) days written notice, if WSDOT defaults and fails to cure such default within that 30-day period, or such longer period, as may be reasonably determined by TENANT, if WSDOT is diligently working to cure the default; (3) immediately, upon w1itten notice, if in TENANT's judgment the Premises is destroyed or damaged so as to substantially and adversely affect the effective me of the Communications Facility. ( 4) at the time title to the Premises transfers to a condemning authority, if there is a condemnation of all or part of the Pren1ises, including a sale of all or part of the Premises to a purchaser with the power of eminent domain in the face of the exercise of the power. 1n such event, each party shall be entitled to pursue 1heir own separate awards with respect to such taking. (i) immediately, upon wTitten notice, ifWSDOT causes material interference and fails to cure as provided in Paragraph 7 herein. B. All Rent pre-paid for the Premises by 1he TENANT prior to the termination date shall be retained by WSDOT; Provided 1hat, TENANT shall be entitled to a pro rata refund of pre-paid Rent in 1he event WSDOT terminates this Lease as provided in 11.A.(5) above, or TENANT terminates pursuant to 12.A.(2) or 12.A. (3) above. 13. Rent A On or before 1he first day of each calendar mon1h during 1he entire term of this Lease, TENANT shall pay to WSDOT as rent and 00/100 DOLLARS ($ __ __) per mon1h plm Washington Leasel1old Excise Tax, if applicable (Rent). Rent for any fractional mon1h at the beginning or at the end of 1he Term or Renewal Period shall be prorated. Rent shall be payable to WSDOT at: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Attn.: Real Estate Services, PO Box 47339, Olympia, WA 98504-7339. RES424 5 12/27/2006 13. The receipt of wy Rent 'w '.::;c:::::T, with knowledge of any breach of ihis Lease by TE"IANT, or of llilY default on the part of the r,, ,.'.l\T in the observance or petfonnancc of any of the conditions or cover1llilts ofihis Lease. shall not tJe ,ieemed a waiver of any provision of this Lease. C. Leasehold Excise Tax, 1f applicable. shall be paid by TENAJ\ 1 to Washington State Departmmt ofRevmue. It is the responsibilitv of the TENAJ\T to a~certain whether Leasehold Excise Tax is required. All rent paymmts must include the rental agreement number. All rmt paymmts must include the rental agreement number WF ________ ~ 14. Rent Adjustments. Rent will be adjusted annually throughout the term of this lease beginning one year from the Anniversary Date of this lease by the greater of either (a) four percent (4%) of the rmt amount in effect at the time of the adjustment OR (b) the perCeI1tage change that occurred during the preceding calmdar year in the US Consumer Ptice Index for all Urban Consumers (US CPI-U) using the data as published by the United States Departmmt of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. Rmt will be adjusted at the beginning of any Rmewal Petiod using the WSDOT Rate Schedule for Wireless Communication I.eases in effoct on the effective date of the renewal, provided that if no such Rate Schedule is in effect, thm rent will be adjusted to market rmt, using the appraisal process. Rmt adjustmmts will continue throughout any Renewal Petiod in the same manner and on the same basis as during the original lease term. 15. Charge for Late Payment. Jf any sums payable to WSDOT under this I.ease are not received by the fifth (5th) day of each month, TE\!ANT shall pay WSDOT, in addition to the amount due, for the cost of collecting and handling such payment, an amount equal to the greater of ONE HUNDRED and 00/100 DOLLARS ($100.00) or five percent (5%) of the delinquent amount In addition, all delinquent sums payable by TENANT to WSDOT and not paid within five (5) days of the due date shall, at WSDOT' s option, bear interest at the rate oft welve perCeI1t (12%) per annum, or the highest rate of interest allowable by law, whichever is greater; provided that if the highest rate allowable by law is less than twelve perCeI1t (12%) interest charged hereunder shall not exceed that amount. Interest on all delinquent amounts shall be calculated from the original due date to the date of payment. Also there shall be a charge for any check returned uncollectible in accordance \vith WAC 468-20-900. WSDOT and TENANT agree that such charges represent a fair and reasonable estinlate of the costs incurred by WSDOT by reason of late paymmts and uncollectible checks. WSDOT's acceptance oflcss than the full an10unt of any payment due from TENANT, shall not be deemed an accord and satisfaction, waiver, or compromise of such payment unless specifically agreed to in wtiting by WSDOT. 16. Cooperation in Use of Site and Communications Facilities. RES424 6 12/2712006 A. TENANT and WSDOT ·: "cm· it :1•1d a6>ree that their trallSmissions will at no time intertere ,vith those of the other party and any :ithu-goven1111ent entity authorized to be located on the Premises. Further. WSDOT and TENA J\T covenant that they will not alter its existing transmission frequencies or anteU11a locations so as to intcrforc 1v·ith those transmissions of the other pmty. TENANT shall advise WSDOT CommUIUcatiollS Systems Director at PO Box 47359, Olympia, WA, 98504-7359, or other such person or address as may be designated in miring by WSDOT, in writing thirty (30) days prior to changing its transmission frequency, antenna type or location so that WSDOT can conduct interference analyses. WSDOT shall advise TENANT in \\siting thirty (30) days prior to changing its transmission frequency. WSDOT and TENANT agree to coordinate their respective transmission frequencies in such a mmmer that neither will interfere with the reception or broadcast of the other. B. TENANT agrees to comply with WSDOT's "Radio Site Standards" dated December 1998, and a11y revisiollS thereto as may be made to comply with the latest standards endorsed by the Western Washington Cooperative Interference Co111111ittec. WSDOT's Radio Site Standards are attached hereto as Exhibit C and by this reference made a pmt thereof 17. Nonapplicability of Relocation Benefits. The TENANT acknowledges that the signing of this Lease does not entitle the TENANT to assistance U11der the Uniform Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Policy (Ch. 8.26 RCW). 18. Encumbrances. TENANT shall not encumber the Premises. 19. Environmental Laws. A. TENANT represents, warrants and agrees that it will conduct its activities on and off the Premises in compliance with all applicable environmental laws. As used in this Lease, Environmental Laws means all federal, state and local environmental laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, judicial or administrative decrees, orders, decisions, authorizations or pennits, including, but not limited to, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6901, et seq., the Clea11 Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401, et seq., the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq., the Emergency Planning a11d CommUIUty Right to Know Act, 42 U.S.C. § 11001, et seq., the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq., the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2601, et seq., the Oil Pollution Control Act 33 U.S.C. § 2701, et seq., and Washington or any other comparable local, state or federal statute or ordinance pertaining to the environment or natural resources a11d all regulations pertaining thereto, including all amendments and/or revisions to said laws and regulations. B. Toxic or hazardous substances are not allowed on the Premises without the express written pennission ofWSDOT and U11der the terms and condiliollS specified by WSDOT. For the purposes of this Lease, "Hazardous Substances" shall include all those substances identified as hazardous U11der the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., and the Washington Model Toxics Control Act, RCW 70.105D et seq., including all amendments and/or RES424 7 12/27/2006 revisions to said laws and regulations. and shdl inciuc:c gasoline and other petroleum products. In the event such petmission is granted, the disposal of such rnectuials must be done in a legal maimer by TENANT. C. TENANT agrees to cooperate in any environmental investigations conducted by WSDOT's staff or independent third parties where there is evidence of contarnination on the Preinises, or where WSDOT is directed to conduct such audit by an agency or agencies having jurisdiction. TENANT will reimburse WSDOT for the cost of such inwstigations, where the need for said investigation is detennined to be caused by TENANT's operations. TENANT 1vill provide WSDOT with notice of any inspections of the Preinises, notices of violations, ar1d orders to clean up contamination. TENANT will permit WSDOT to participate in all settleinent or abateinent discussions. In the event TENANT fails to take reinedial measures as duly directed by a state, federal, or local regulatory agency within ninety (90) days of such notice, WSDOT may elect to pcrfonn such work, and TENANT covenants and agrees to reimburse WSDOT for all direct and indirect costs associated with WSDOT's work where said con!anlination is detennined to have resulted from TENANT's use of the Preinises. D. TENANT agrees the use of the Premises shall be such that no hazardous or objectionable smoke, fumes, vapor, odors, or discharge of ar1y kind shall rise above the grade of the right of way. E. For the purposes of this Lease, "Costs" shall include but not be limited to, all response costs, disposal fees, investigatory costs, monitoring costs, civil or criminal penalties, and attorneys' fees and other litigation costs incurred in complying with state or federal environmrntal laws, which shall include but not be limited to, the Comprehensive Environmrntal Response, Compensation and Liability A(,,1, 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq.; the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. ~ 1251; the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6901; and the Washington Model Toxics Control Act, Ch. 70.105D RCW, et seq., including all arnrndments ar1cl/or revisions to said laws and regulations. F. TENANT agrees to defrnd, indeinnily and hold WSDOT harmless from and against any and all claims, causes of action, demands and liability, which are caused by or result from TENANT'S activities on the Preinises, including but not limited to any costs, liabilities, damages, expenses, assessments, prnalties, fines, losses, judgmrnts and attorneys' foes associated with the reinoval or remediation of any Hazardous Substances that have been relea-;ed, or otherwise come to be located on the Preinises, including those that may have migrated from the Premises through water or soil to other properties, including without limitation, the adjaeet1t WSDOT property. G. TENANT further agrees to defend and indemnify and hold WSDOT harmless from any and all liability arising from the offsite disposal, boodling, treatrnrnt, storage, or transportation of any Hazardous Substances reinoved from said property, which Hazardous Substances were released on to the Premises as a result ofTENANT's activities. RES424 8 12/27/2006 H. WSDOT hereby agrees t,, i:1:ic;,wif" and hold TENA1\1T hannless from m1y Costs or liabilities associated with the removal or rrn1e:k.,o,1 :,f any Hazardous Substances that have been released. or otherwise come to be located on the Frcrniscs bv the acts or omissions of WSDOT, its employees, contractors, and agents. WSDOT further agrees to defend and indemnify and hold TENANT hannless from any and all liability arising from the oftsite disposal, handling, treatment, storage, or transportation of any Hazardous Substances removed from said property, which such Hazardous Substances have been released on the Premises as a result ofWSDOT' s acts or omissions or those ofits contractors or agents. l. WSDOT represents, warrants and agrees that it has in the past and will in the future conduct its activities on the Premises in compliance with all applicable Environmental Laws and that the Premises is free of Hazardous Substances as ofthe date of this Lease. J. The provisions of this paragraph shall survive the expiration or temrination of this Lease. 20. Advertising Devices, Signs, and Lighting. A Advertising devices are not pennitted on the Premises. Lights outside of the TENANT's equipment shelter are not pemritted, except as required by the Federal Aviation Aulhority (FAA) or the Federal Communications Commission (FCC): Provided that, any such required lights shall require prior written approval by the WSDOT at (address) or other such person or address as may be designated in writing by WSDOT, which approval shall not be unreasonably wilhheld; Provided further that, WSDOT may deny such approval where the lights, in WSDOT's sole discretion, constitute a hazard to the highway or the motrning public. TENANT shall install and maintain at TENANT's sole expense, any such lighting required to meet FAA or FCC regulations and which have been approved by WSDOT. B. TENANT shall post and maintain on its equipment cabinet a sign no larger than an eighteen inch (18'') square giving an emergency telephone number. The WSDOT Regional Traffic Engineer at (address) or other such person or address as may be designated in writing by WSDOT, shall be offered lhe opportunity to review and approve this sign for color and content prior to installation. No other signs are permitted on the Premises. 21. Laws, Ordinances, Regulations. TENANT shall at all times and at its sole expense, comply with all laws and ordinances, orders, 6,uidelines, policies, directives, rules and regulations of municipal, county, state and federal governmental authorities or regulatory agencies (Laws). TENANT shall defend, indemnify and hold hannless WSDOT any agents, officers, or employees thereof against any claims arising :from any violations by TENANT, its agents or employees, of any such Laws. The indemnity provision of this paragraph shall survive the tennination or expiration of this Lease. 22. Improvements, Fixtures and Personal Property. RES424 9 12/27/2006 A. TENANT shall provide vs,-;,:-, -.,.iJ1 two complete sets of plans and specifications for grading and all improvements proposed le he .cued on the Premises and should be affixed with an appropriate professional stmctural engineers license. All sucb plans and any changes thereof are subject to prior written approval by the WSDOT Accommodations and Safety Engineer at (address) __ _ or other such person or address as may be designated in v.-1iting by WSDOT. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. B. With the exception of TEN ANT' s routine maintenance and repair work whereby TENANT may replace its communications equipment with substantially similar communications equipment. TENANT shall not add to its building to be constructed under this Lease, or construct additional improvements on the Premises except by prior written approval by the WSDOT Accommodations and Safety Engineer at ( address) or other such person or address as may be designated in writing by WSDOT, and under such terms and conditions as may be specified by WSDOT. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. C. In addition to other rights of access provided elsewhere herein, WSDOT and the Federal Highway Administration may from time-to-time go upon the Leased Premises to inspect any work done by the TENANT to insure compliance with the approved plans and specifications or otherwise. Further, this right shall not inlpose any obligation upon WSDOT to make inspections to ascertain the safety of the TENANT's inlprovements or the condition of the Leased Premises. D. TENANT expressly acknowledges and agrees that WSDOT's rights under this Lease to review, comment on, disapprove and/or accept designs, plans specifications, work plans, construction, equipment, installation, (i) exist solely for the benefit and protection of WSDOT, (ii) do not create or inlpose upon WSDOT any standard or duty of care toward the TENANT, all of which are hereby disclainied, (iii) may not be relied upon by the TENANT in detemaining whether the TENANT has satisfied any and all applicable standards and requirements and (iv) may not be asserted, nor may WSDOT's exercise or fuilure to exercise any such rights be asserted, against WSDOT by the TENANT as a defense, legal or equitable, to TENANT's obligation to fulfill such standards and requirements and regardless of any acceptance of work by the WSDOT. E. TENANT's wireless equipment located on the Premises shall remain the exclusive property of TENANT. WSDOT shall not be liable in any manner for, or on account of, any loss or damage sustained to any property of whatsoever kind stored, kept or maintained in or about the Premises, except such claims or losses that may be caused by WSDOT or its agents or employees. RES424 10 12/27/2006 F. Upon tcnnination or e:::r"t:(11: :·-:· this L~se under the provisions herein. the improvements constructed on the Premises ,hcit remain the personal property of TENANT. shall be removed by TENANT at its expense in a rmscnahle rn:mner presciibed by WSDOT. G. WSDOT may remove any ::i"TET\A-'ff's personal property not acquired by WSDOT and that remains on the Premises beyond the tcirnination date at TENANT's expense and place it in storage at TENANT's expense for a period of thirty {30) days. WSDOT will notify TENANT in writing when such personal property is placed in storage. ln the event TENANT has not removed said personal property from storage within this thirty (30) day period, WSDOT may dispose of it in any manner WSDOT deems appropriate. TENANT shall reimburse WSDOT for the cost of such removal and storage prior to removing said personal property from storage or within thi1ty (30) days of the date ofWSDOT's invoice, whichever occurs first. 23. Maintenance. TENANT shall, at its own expense and at all times, keep the Premises and Communications Facility neat, clean and in a sanitmy condition, m1d keep and use the Premises and Communications Facility in accordance with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and requirements of gov=ental authorities. TENANT shall permit no waste, dmnage or injury to the Premises. TENANT shall make such repairs as necessmy to maintain the Premises in as good condition as existed on the Anniversmy Date, reasonable wear, and damage by fire and other casualty for which TENANT is not responsible excepted. 24. TENANT's Acceptance of Premises. TENANT has exanlined the Premises m1d accepts them in their present condition as part of the consideration of this Lease. 25. WSDOT's Reservation of Right to Maintain and Grant Utility Franchises and Permits. A. WSDOT reserves the right for utility frmlchise m1d permit holders to enter upon the Premises to maintain facilities m1d, for itselt; to grm1t utility frmlchises m1d/or pennits across the Premises; Provided, that such fraJlchises/permits do not matciially interfere with TENANT's authorized use of the Premises. Such installation will be accomplished in such a manner as to minimize m1y disruption to TENANT. The frmlchiselpennit holder will be required to restore paving, grading m1d improvements damaged by the installation. B. TENANT will not disturb markci-s installed by a frmlchiselpennit holder m1d will contact the frmlchiselpem1it holder prior to m1y excavation in order that the frmlchiselpermit holder may locate the utility. It is TENANT's responsibility to protect legally installed underground utilities from damage caused by itself, its contractors, agents m1d invitees. C. Prior to m1y operation in which earth, rock, or other material on or below the ground is moved or otherwise displaced to a vertical depth of twelve inches (12") or greater, TENANT must call the RES424 11 12.127/2006 Cnderground Utility Locating Service. . ;;· i'.s successor organization. to ascertain the existence of underground utilities. D. TENA.t'<T must comply ,vi;h ail pnwisions of Ch. 19.122 RCW relating to underground facilities. 26. Taxes, Assessments, and Ctilities. TENANT agrees to pay all raxes and assessments which are the result of TENANT's use of the Premises and/or which may hereafter become a lien on the interest of TENANT in accordance with RCW 79.44.010. TENANT shall pay all raxes which may hereafter be levied or imposed upon the interest of TENANT or by reason of this Lease. TENANT is responsible for and agrees to pay for utilities that serve the Premises. 27. Liens. A. Nothing in this Lease shall be deemed to make TENANT the agent of WSDOT for pU!JlOSes of construction, repair, alteration, or installation of structures, improvements, equipment, or facilities on the Premises. TENANT acknowkxlges that WSDOT may not, and shall not, be subject to claims or liens for labor or materials in connection with such activities by TENANT. B. TENANT shall at all times indemnify and hold WSDOT harmless from all claims for labor or materials in connection with construction, repair, alteration, or installation of structures, improvements, equipment, or facilities within the Premises, caused by TENANT or as a result of TENANT's actions or omissions and from the cost of defending against such claims, including attorneys' fees. C. In the event a lien in connection with the aforesaid activities by TENANT is filed upon the Premises, TENANT shall either: (1) Immediately cause a valid Release of Lien to be recorded, or (2) Deposit sufficient cash with WSDOT to cover the amount of the claim on the lien in question and authorize payment to the extent of said deposit to any subsequent judgment holder that may arise as a matter of public record from litigation with regard to lien holder claim, or (3) Procure and record a bond which releases the Premises from the claim of the lien and from any action brought to foreclose the lien. D. Should TENANT fail to accomplish C.I., 2., or 3., above within thirty (30) days after the filing of such a lien, the TENANT shall be in default; the lease may be terminated and WSDOT institute legal action against the TENANT for repayment of the Lien Amount. 28. A. WSDOT's Right of Entry and hlspection. WSDOT, for itself and its agents and contractors, and the Federal Highway Administration, reserves the right to enter L1pon the Premises at any time and without notice to TENANT, RES424 12 12127/2006 but not to go inside the shelter, except on ;-rnso;1alclc notice to TENAt'\ff and in TENANT's presence, for the purpose of operatioIL inspection. maintenance. c;,nstmction. or reconstruction ofthe highway facility or any element thereof Further, WSDOT am] the c·cdcral Highway Administration may also, from time to time, go upon the Premises for the purpose of inspecting any excavatioIL construction, or maintenance work being done by TENANT. WSDOT will take all reasonable measures to minimize any disruption to TENANT. WSDOT shall in no way be responsible for any incidental or consequential damages, including, but not limited to, lost profits due to such loss of use by TENANT; Provided, that TENANT may be entitled a pro rata reduction of rent for the petiod in which the Premises could not be used by TENANT due to such entry. B. Entry upon 1he Premises for any other purpose by WSDOT shall be conducted wi1h reasonable notice to 1he TENANT and during the hours of8 a.m. to 5 p.m. 29. Insurance. At its sole expense, the TENANT shall secure and maintain in effect a policy of general liability insurance issued by an insw-er licensed to conduct business in 1he State of Washington. The insurance policy shall provide liability cove111ge for any and all claims of bodily injury, property damage, and personal injury arising from the tenant's w;e of the Pretnises which is 1he subject of this Lease. The insurance policy required by this section shall provide coverage of no less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) combined single limit of liability per occw-rence, wi1h a general aggregate limit of no less 1han Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000.00) per policy period. The TENANT agrees 1hat WSDOT may require increases in said coverages by written notice to TENANT, as WSDOT deems reasonably necessary. Coverages under said policy shall be triggei·e<l on an "occurrence basis," not a "claims made" basis. WSDOT shall be named as an additional insured in the commercial general liability policy required by this section. The policy shall be endorsed with a provision relieving WSDOT of any responsibility for 1he payment of any policy premium. The endorsement shall require 1he insurer to provide WSDOT, wi1h no less 1han THIRTY (30) days written notice before any cancellation of 1he coverages required by this section. Coverages, if obtained by the TENANT in compliance wi1h this section, shall not be deemed as having relieved the TENANT of any liability. Claims for damages resulting from the TENANT's use of 1he Premises under this Lease remain 1he responsibility of 1he TENANT and will be forwarded to 1he TENANT for handling if received by WSDOT. Further, 1he TENANT shall provide WSDOT with a certificate of insurance reflecting 1he insw-ance coverage required by this section within TEN (10) business days of the execution of this Lease, and within TEN (10) days of receiving a written notice from \VS DOT for an increase in the coverage amounts. 30. A. Hold Harmless, Indemnification. To 1he extent allowed by law, TENANT, its successors and assigns, will protect, save, and hold harmless the WSDOT, its au1horized agents and employees, from all claims, actions, costs, damages, or expenses of any nature whatsoever by reason of the acts or omissions of TENANT, its agents, contractors, or employees, arising out of, or in connection with, its acts or activities or 1he acts or activities of RES424 13 12/27/2006 • its, agents, contractors, or employees, relate.:\ t his , .2:ise. TENANT further agrees to defend the WSDOT. its agents or employees. in any litigation. incic,ding :cmment of any costs or attorneys' fees, for any claims or action commenced, arising out of, or in connccricn with, the acts or activities related to this Lease. The obligations in this paragraph shall not include such claims, costs, damages, or expenses to the extent caused by the acts of the WSDOT or its authonzcd agents or employees; PROVIDED, that if the claims or damages are caused by or result from the concmTent acts of (a) the WSDOT, its agents, contractors, or employees and (b) TENANT, its agents, conb·actors. or en1ployees, or involves those actions covered by Ch. 4.24.115 RCW, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the acts of TENANTs agents or employees. B. To the extent allowed by law, the WSDOT, its successors and assigns, will protect, save, and hold harmless TENANT, its authorized agents and employees, from all claims, actions, costs, damages, or expenses of any nature whatsoever by reason of the acts or omissions of the WSDOT, its agents, contractors, or employees, arising out of or in connection with its acts or activities or the acts or activities of its agents, contractors, or employees, authmized hy this Lease. The WSDOT further agrees to defend TENANT, its agents or employees, in any litigation, including payment of any costs or attorneys' fees, for any claims or action commenced, arising out of, or in connection with the acts or activities authorized by this Lease. The obligations in this paragraph shall not include such claims, costs, damages, or expense to the extent caused by the acts ofTENANT or its auth01ized agents or employees; PROVIDED, that if the claims or damages are caused by or result from the concurrent acts of (a) TENANT, its agents, contractors, or employees by or result from the concurrent acts of; (b) the WSDOT, its agents, contractors, or employees, or involves those actions covered by Ch. 4.24.115 RCW, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the acts of the WSDOT or the WSDOT's agents or employees. C. TENANT specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by TENANT's own employees against the WSDOT and, solely for the pw1Jose of this indemnification and defense, TENANT specifically waives any in1munity under the state indusbial insurance law, Title 51 RCW and has been mutually negotiated by the parties. D. The WSDOT specifically assun1es potential liability for actions brought by the WSDOT's own employees against TENANT and, solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense, the WSDOT specifically waives any in1munity under the slate industrial insurance law, Title 51 RCW and has been mutually negotiated by the parties. E. The indemnification provisions in this paragraph shall survive the expiration or termination of this Lease. 31. Nondiscrimination. TENANT, for itself, its successors, and assigns as a part of fue consideration hereot; does hereby covenant and agree to comply with all civil rights and anti-discrimination requirements of Ch. 49.60 RCW, as to the Premises. 32. Assignment RES424 14 12/27/2006 • A. "!either this Lease, nor anv .igrts ·~rcated by it, may be a,signed, sublet, or transferred without ¥.1itten permission from WSDOT. ., nv SLrd1 assignment shall be in \Vriting on a form approved by WSDOT and shall include an assumption of this Lease by the assignee. B. Notwithstanding the foregoing. TE::-; Ai'IT may assign its interest in this Lease, without WSDOT's consent, to any entity which controls, is controlled by, or is W1der common control with TENANT, or to any entity resulting from any merger or consolidation with TENANT, or to any partner of TENANT, or to any partnership in which TE01Al\T is a general partner, or to any person or entity which acquires fifly one percent (51%) or more the assets of TENANT or fifly one percent (51 %) or more of the assets of the TENANT in the Metropolitan Trading Area in which the Premises is located, as a going concern, Provided, that the assignment includes an assumption of the Lease by the assignee; and Provided Further, that TENANT shall provide WSDOT with a copy of said \Vritten assignment or \Vritten notice of such assignment within a reasonable time of its execution. TENANT shall be boW1d by and responsible for compliance with all provisions of this Lease until such time as notice of the successor TENANT has been received by WSDOT. C. WSDOT hereby consents to the creating or granting of a security instrument by which TENANT's rights Wlder this Lease serve a, collateral security to any entity (Security Entity) that provides financing for the purchase of the equipment to be irL,talled at the Premises. The creating or granting of such a security interest shall not be deemed an assignment W1der this lease; Provided, that in the event the Security Entity, pursuant to the tenns of the security instrument, acquires the leasehold estate created W1der this Lease, an assignment shall be deemed to have occurred and (I) The TENANT and the Security Entity shall execute an assignment and assumption of the Lease in a form acceptable to WSDOT; (2) TENANT shall promptly provide WSDOT with a copy of said assignment and assumption; and (3) TENANT shall be boillld by and responsible for compliance witl1 all provisions of this Lease W1til such time that the assignment and assumption has been received by WSDOT. D. WSDOT's consent to one assignment shall not waive the requirement of obtaining WSDOT's consent to any subsequent assigru11ent E. Should WSDOT sell, lease, transfer, or otherwise convey all or any part of the Premises that is subject to this Lease to any transferee other than TENANT, such transfer shall be subject to this Lease. F. In the event TENANT terminates this Lease and third parties also occupy the tower, TENANT shall assign its interest in such agreement to WSDOT, ifWSDOT desires to assume TENANT's position in such agreements. RES424 15 12/27/2006 • 33. Peiiormance by \VSoc··. f ,·,:·, A '\TT defaults in the performance or observation of any covenant or agreement contained in this '~ease. \VSDOT, without notice if deemed by WSDOT that an emergency exists, or ifno emergency, with th;11y (301 days notice, may direct TENAl'IT to stop work and may it~elf perform or cause to be performed such covenant or agreement and may enter upon the Premises for such purpose. Such an emergency shall include. but not be limited to, endangerment oflife, the highway facility, or the Highway Advisory Radio System or failure of TENANT to obtain in a timely manner any insurance. TENANT shall reimburse WS DOT the entire cost and expense of such performance by WSDOT within thirty (30) days of the date ofWSDOT's invoice. Any act or thing done by WSDOT under the provisions of this paragraph shall not be constmed as a waiver of any agreement or condition herein contained or the performance thereof 34. Restoration of Site. Prior to the tcnnination or expiration date of this Lease, TENANT agrees, if so directed by WSDOT, to restore the Premises to its condition prior to TENANT's occupancy, reasonable wear and tear excepted. This work is to be done at TENANT's expense and to the reasonable satisfaction ofWSDOT. 35. Vacation of Leased Premises. Upon termination of this Lease, the TENANT shall cease its operations on and/or use of the Leased Premises. In the event the TENANT fails to vacate the Leased Premises on the date of termination, it shall be liable for any and all costs to WSDOT arising from such failure. 36. Modifications. This instmment contains all the agreements and conditions made between the parties hereto and may not be modified orally or in any manner other than by an agreement in writing signed by all parties thereto. No failure on the part of either party to enforce any covenant or provision herein contained, nor any waiver of any right there under by the state, unless in writing, shall discharge or invalidate such covenant or provision or affoct the right of the either party to enforce the same in the event of any subsequent breach or default. 37. Waiver of WSDOT's Lien Rights. WSDOT hereby waives any and all lien rights it may have, statutory or otherwise, concerning TENANT's radio transmitting or receiving equipment or any portion thereof, which shall be deemed personal property for the purposes of this Lease, regardless of whether or not same is deemed real or personal property under applicable laws, and WSDOT gives TENANT the right to remove all or any portion of same from time to time in TENANT's sole discretion and without WSDOT's consent. 38. Brokers' Fees. If TENANT is represented by a real estate broker in this transaction, TENANT shall be fully responsible for any fee due snch broker, and shall hold WSDOT harmless from any claims for commission by such broker. RES424 16 12/27/2006 39. Cooperation in Exccutio.c , :· :':·.m,cc uent Documents. WSDOT and TENANT agree to cooperate in executing any document, (incic,c'ing ~ :V!cmorandum of Lease) necessary to protect the rights of the parties granted by this Lease. 40. Inte1pretation. 111is Lea,c shall he construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. The titles to paragraphs or sections of this Lease are for convenience only, and shall have no effect on the construction or interpretation of any paragraph hereof 41. Invalid Provision. If any provision or condition of this Lease is found to be void or invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining tcnns of this Lease, which shall continue in full force and effect. 42. Totality of Agreement. It is understood that no guarantees, representations, promises, or statements expressed or implied have been made by TENANT or by WSDOT, except to the extent that the same are expressed in this Lease. And it is furt11er w1derstood that this Lease shall not be valid and binding upon WSDOT unless and W1til accepted and approved by the Secretary of Transportation or his duly aufuorized representative. 43. Attorney Fees. In fue event of any controversy, claim, or dispute arising out of this Lease, each party shall be solely responsible for the payment of its own legal expenses, including but not linuted to attorney's fees and costs. 44. Venue. TENANT agrees that the venue of any action or suit concerning this Lease shall be in fue Thurston County Superior Court, and all actions or suits fuereon shall be brought therein, unless the parties mutually agree ofuerwise, in writing. 45. Notices. Except as ofuerwise designated in fuis Lease, wherever in this Lease written notices are to be given or made, fuey will be delivered or sent by certified mail addressed to fue parties at fue address listed below unless a different address shall be previously designated in writing and delivered to fue oilier party. Notice shall be deemed effective as of the delivery date. Tenant agrees to accept service of process or certified mail at fue address provided for herein, provided such address is located in fue State of Washington. Ofuerwise, TENANT designates fue Secretary of State of Washington as an agent for fue purpose of service of process. Such service shall be deemed personal service. TENANT: RES424 17 STATE: WASHINGTON STA TE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Attn.: Director, Real Estate Services POBox47338 Olympia, WA 98504-7338 12/27/2006 • Copy to: Copy to: TENANT WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RES424 18 12/27/2006 • • Signatures: Dated: ------------~ By ______________ _ Title -------------- RES424 19 Accepted and Approved by: Dated: ------------- WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By: _____________ _ Gerald L. Gallinger Director, Real Estate Services APPROVED AS TO FORM ------------------'' 20_ By: _____________ _ Assistant Attorney General 12/27/2006 • • AGENC,' .\C:<.,,1:rWLEDG.\1ENT STATE OF WASHINGTON } ss COUNTY OF On this day of he fore me personally appeared ____________ .,tome known to be the duly appointed _________________ and that he/she executed the within and foregoing instnnnent and acknowledged the said instnunent to he his/her free and voluntary act and deed of said State ofW ashington, for the uses and pU1pOses thc~·ein set forth, and on oath Lessees that he/she was authorized to execute said instnnnent IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the _________ day of , 20_. (Signature) (Print or type name) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at. _____________ _ My commission expires _______ _ RES424 20 12/27/2006 -~ .... CORPORA ' L 'C'.(>!OWLEDGME:\fT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF On this day of 20 _ before me personally appeared to me known to be the of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument. GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. (Signature) (Print or type name) Kotary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at. _____________ _ My commission expires _______ ~ RES424 21 12/27/2006 INDIVIDU/i-,1 :::\.NOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF On this ________ day of _________ .20_before me personally appeared , to me known to be the individual described in and who -------------- executed the foregoing instnnnent, and acknowledged that he/she signed and sealed the same as his/her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GNEN under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. (Signature) (Print or type name) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at _____________ _ My ccrnmission expires -------- RES424 22 12/2712006 • 1.. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF On this day of , 20_ before me personally appeared Gerald L. Gallinger, to me known to be the duly appointed Real Estate Services Director, and that he executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said State of Washington, for the uses and purposes therein set forth, and on oath states that he was authorized to execute said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the ____ day of , 20_ (Signature) (Print or type name) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at. ______________ _ My commission expires ________ _ RES424 23 12/27/2006 NON-IONIZING ELECTROMAGNETIC EXPOSURE ANALYSIS & ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION • • • • • • SITE NUMBER: SE2545A SITE NAME: Kennydale • 1 e · SITE ADDRESS: Adj to 2219 Meadow Ave N Renton, WA 98065 DATE: December 4, 2006 PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. PROJECT The proposed T-Mobile project consists of a WCF (Wireless Communications Facility) located in the R.O.W., adjacent to 2219 Meadow Ave N, Renton, WA 98065. The planned improvements include antennas mounted on a new 60' AGL steel monopole with supporting BTS (Base Transmission System) radio equipment located in a lease area at the base of the monopole. EQUIPMENT Type of Service: Broadband PCS Antennas: Andrew ADFD182-6565B-R1 OM (1 per sector) Sectors: 3 (alpha= 0°, beta= 90°, gamma= 180°) Frequencies: Send (1965 Mhz -1975 Mhz, 1980 Mhz -1985 mMhz) Receive (1885 Mhz -1895 Mhz, 1900 Mhz -1905 Mhz) Maximum Power: 432 w/channel ERP (58.5 dBm/channel EIRP) Maximum Channels: 4 per sector Antenna Rad Center: 57'-9" AGL CALCULATIONS Calculations for RF power densities near ground level are based on the "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields OET Bulletin 65" Edition 97-01, August 1997 issued by the Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering & Technology. Section 2 of OET Bulletin 65 demonstrates that ''for a truly worst-case prediction of power density at or near the surface, such as at ground-level or on a rooftop, 100% reflection of incoming radiation can be assumed, resulting in a potential doubling of predicted field strength and a four-fold increase in (far field equivalent) power density''. Therefore the following equation is used: S = EIRP/rrR2 Where S = power density (mW/cm 2 ), EIRP = equivalent isotropically radiated power and R = distance to the center of the radiation antenna (cm) Attached as an exhibit are the MPE (Maximum Power Exposure) calculations using the above referenced formula and the antenna manufacturers product data information with dB loss data below main lobe as provided by the manufacturer. The calculations show that the maximum MPE at ground level (6' above AGL) occurs at a minor lobe angle of 38°, 63.2' from the base of the monopole and the power density is 0.006741 W/cm 2 with 4 channels operating at a total ERP of 1,726 watts. This is 0.6741 % of the MPE limit for the general population/uncontrolled exposure of 1.0 mW/cm2 as referenced in Table I OET Bulletin 65 Appendix A. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Routine environmental evaluation is required if the PCS broadband facility is less than 10 m (32.81 feet) AGL and has a total power of all channels in any given sector greater than 2,000W ERP as referenced in "Table 2 Transmitters, Facilities and Operations subject to Routine environmental Evaluation" of Bulletin 65. As the proposed antennas lowest point above ground level is 16.9 m (55.5 feet), the WCF is categorically exempt from requirement for routine environmental processing. FCC COMPLIANCE The general population/uncontrolled exposure near the monopole, including persons at ground level, surrounding properties, inside and on existing structures will have RF exposure much lower than the "worst case" scenario, which is a small fraction of the MPE limit. Only trained persons will be allowed to climb the monopole for maintenance operations. T-mobile and/or its contractors will provide training to make the employees fully aware of the potential for RF exposure occupational training and they can exercise control over their exposure that is within the occupational/controlled limits. CONCLUSIONS Based on calculations, the proposed WCF will comply with current FCC and county guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. All representations contained herein are true to the best of my knowledge. EXIHIBITS • MPE Calculations • Antenna Product Data Sheets • WCF Location Map SE2545A Kennydale Adj to 2219 Meadow Ave N Renton, WA 98065 Antenna used in analysis is ADFP182-656SB-XDM 2d by Andrew MPE Calculatlons Effective tower height assumes a person 6 ft tall. ~"""" main beam 4 TRX Maximum tower 5775 6.74E-03 ,1e1ght, 0.006741 ma;,i pONE!r density in mW/cm (4TRX) y 0.6741% rcenta e at standard horiz. Dist., X Note: 1 mW/cm2 is 100% of allowable standarc effective radiation tower ERP ERP Power at point x center height minor lobe dB below honz. dist hyptonuse hypotcni;s(; hypotenuse main lobe main lobe minor lobe minor lobe minor lobe at ground level (feet), y (feet), 'f angle main lobe lengtt, (feet) length {kmi length (cm) (watts) (dBm) ERP (dBm) EIRP (dBm) EIRP(mW) mW/cm"2 57 75 51.75 1 0.5 2964.756 2965.207 0 904 90379.513 1726 62.37 61.87 6403 2529535.57 9.86E-05 57.75 51.75 2 0 1481 926 1482.829 0452 45196.640 1726 62.37 62.37 64.53 2838185.59 4.42E--04 57.75 51.75 3 0 987 449 988.804 0 301 30138.744 1726 62.37 62.37 64.53 2638185.59 9.95E--04 57.75 51 75 4 0.4 740.059 741.867 0226 22612.095 1726 62.37 61 97 6413 2588456.03 1.61E-03 57.75 51.75 5 1.3 591.505 593.765 0. 181 18097.947 1726 62.37 61 07 6323 2103976.05 2 04E-03 57.75 51.75 6 2.7 492.388 495.080 0 151 15090.053 1726 62.37 59.67 61.63 1524195.91 2 13E-03 57.75 51.75 7 5.1 421.470 424.635 0 129 12942.878 1726 62.37 57.27 59.43 877083.20 1.67E-03 57.75 51.75 8 8.1 368.220 371.839 0. 113 11333.656 1726 62.37 54.27 56.43 439582.90 1.09E-03 57.75 51.75 9 12.9 326.737 330.809 0 101 10083.072 1726 62.37 49.47 51.63 145559.58 4.56E-04 57.75 51.75 10 20.6 293.489 298.016 0 001 9083 539 1726 62.37 41.77 43.93 24719.56 9.54E-05 57 75 51.75 11 23.1 266.231 271.214 0 083 8266 591 1726 62.37 39.27 41.43 13900.63 6.47E-05 57 75 51.75 12 179 243.465 248.904 0.076 7566.586 1726 62.37 44.47 46.63 46029.98 2 55E-04 57.75 51.75 13 15.9 224. 154 230.050 0.070 7011.925 1726 62.37 46.47 48.63 72952.60 4.nE-04 57.75 51.75 14 161 207 558 213.912 0.065 6520.038 1726 62.37 46.27 48.43 69669.19 5.22E-04 57.75 51.75 15 18.1 193.134 199.947 0.061 li094 374 1726 62.37 44.27 46.43 43958.29 3.77E-04 57.75 51 75 16 22.5 180.474 167.747 0.057 5722.519 1726 62.37 39.87 42.03 15960.29 1.SSE-04 57.75 51.75 17 32.5 169.267 177.001 0.054 5394.962 1726 62.37 29.87 32.03 1596 03 1.75E-05 57.75 51.75 18 27.3 159.270 167 467 0.051 5104.379 1726 62.37 35.07 37.23 5284 95 6.46E-05 57.75 51.75 19 21.6 150.293 158.953 0 048 4844 884 1726 62.37 40.57 42.73 16751.71 2.54E--04 57.75 51 75 20 19.5 142.182 151.307 0 046 4611.834 1726 62.37 42.87 45.03 31844.97 4.77E-04 57.75 51.75 21 19.1 134.813 144.405 0.044 4401.454 1726 62.37 43.27 45.43 34917.31 5.74E-04 57.75 51.75 22 20.1 128.086 138145 0 042 4210 657 1726 62.37 42.27 44.43 27735.81 4.98E-04 57.75 51.75 23 22.7 121.915 132 444 0 040 4036 894 1726 62.37 39.67 41.83 15241.96 2.98E-04 57.75 51.75 24 27.4 116.232 127.232 0 039 3678 038 1726 62.37 34.97 37.13 5164.65 1.09E-04 57.75 51.75 25 36.5 110.978 122.451 0 037 3732.304 1726 62.37 25.87 2603 635 2-9 1.45E-05 57.75 51.75 26 30 9 106.103 118.051 0 036 3598 184 1726 62.37 31.47 33.63 2306.96 5.67E-05 57.75 51.75 27 27 101.565 113.989 0 035 3474 390 1726 62.37 35.37 37.53 5662.92 1.49E-04 57.75 51.75 28 264 97.328 110.230 0.034 3359.820 1726 62.37 3597 38.13 6501.91 1.83E-04 57.75 51.75 29 2B 93.359 106 743 0 033 3253 525 1726 62.37 34.37 36.53 4498.22 1.35E-04 57.75 51.75 30 34 89.634 103 500 0 032 3154 680 1726 62.37 26.37 30.53 1129.90 3.61E-05 57.75 51.75 31 31.7 86.126 100.476 0 03•, 3062 570 1726 62.37 30 67 32.83 1918.85 6.51E-05 57.75 51.75 32 23.4 82.817 97.656 0 030 2976.567 1726 62 37 38.97 41.13 12973.01 4.66E-04 57.75 51.75 33 19.2 79.688 95.017 0 029 2896 120 1726 62.37 43.17 45.33 34122.50 1.29E-03 57.75 51.75 34 16.4 76.723 92.544 0 028 2820.744 1726 62.37 45.97 46.13 65019.08 2.60E-03 57.75 51.75 35 14.4 73.907 90223 0 028 2750 008 1726 62.37 47.97 50.13 103048.29 4.34E-03 57 75 51.75 36 13.4 71.226 88.042 0 027 2683 531 1726 62.37 48.97 51.13 129730.11 5.73E-03 57 75 51.75 37 13 68.675 85.990 0 026 2620 971 1726 62.37 49.37 51 53 142246.24 6.59E-03 57.75 51.75 " 13.1 66.237 84.056 0 026 2562 025 1726 62.37 49.27 51.43 139008.32 6.74E-03 57.75 51.75 " 13.6 63.906 82.232 0 025 2506418 1726 62.37 4B.77 50.93 123691.29 6.2BE-03 57.75 51 75 40 14.6 61.673 80.509 0 025 2453 905 1726 62.37 47 77 49 93 98410.35 5.20E-03 57.75 51 75 41 16.3 59.532 7B.680 0.024 24G4.265 1726 62.37 46 07 48.23 66533 56 3 66E-03 57.75 51.75 42 18.5 57.474 77.339 0 024 2357.296 1726 62.37 43.B7 46.03 40090.44 2 30E-03 57.75 51.75 43 21.1 55.495 75 B80 0 023 23'2.621 1726 62.37 41.27 43.43 22031.33 1.31E-03 57.75 51 75 44 24.9 53.589 74.497 0.023 2270.670 1726 62.37 37.47 39.63 918419 5.67E--04 57.75 51.75 45 281 51.750 73.186 0.022 2230.696 1726 62.37 34.27 36.43 4395.83 281E--04 57.75 51.75 46 284 49.974 71.941 0.022 2192.761 1726 62.37 33.97 36.13 4102.43 2 72E-04 57.75 51.75 47 26.2 48.258 70.759 0.022 2156.740 1726 62.37 36.17 38.33 6608.33 4.66E--04 57.75 51.75 48 24.4 46.596 69.636 0.021 2122.520 1726 62 37 37.97 40.13 10304.83 7.28E--04 57.75 51 75 49 24 44 986 68.569 0.021 2089.996 1726 62.37 38.37 40.53 11299.02 8.23E--04 57.75 51.75 50 24.5 43.423 67.555 0 021 2059.071 1726 62.37 37.67 40.03 10070.26 7.56E-04 57.75 51.75 51 25.4 41.906 66.590 0 020 2029.657 1726 62 37 36.97 39.13 8185.42 6.32E-04 57.75 51 75 52 26.9 40.432 65.672 0.020 2001.673 1726 62.37 35.47 37.63 5794.83 4.60E--04 57.75 51.75 53 30.7 38.996 64.798 0.020 1975.044 1726 62 37 31.67 33.83 2415 69 1.97E-04 57.75 51.75 54 32.8 37.599 83.967 0.019 1949.699 1726 62.37 29.57 31.73 1489 50 1.25E-04 57.75 51.75 55 34' 36.236 63.175 0 019 1925.577 1726 62.37 28.07 3023 1054.49 9.0SE-05 57.75 51.75 56 32 34906 62.422 0 019 1902 616 1726 62.37 30.37 32.53 1790.77 1.57E-04 57.75 51.75 57 28.4 33.607 61.705 0 019 1880.762 1726 62.37 33.97 36.13 4102.43 3.69E-04 57.75 51.75 58 26.5 32.337 61.022 0 019 1859 965 1726 62.37 35.87 38 03 6353.91 5.65E-04 57.75 51.75 59 25 3 31 095 60.373 0 018 1840. 178 1726 62.37 37.07 3923 8376.08 7.87E-04 57.75 51.75 60 244 29.878 59.756 0 018 182'. 355 1726 62.37 37.97 40.13 10304.83 9.89E-04 57.75 51.75 61 24.7 26.685 59169 o om 1803.458 1726 62 37 37.67 39.83 9617.03 9.41E-04 57.75 51.75 62 25 27.516 58.611 0 018 1786.448 1726 62.37 37 37 39.53 8975.13 8.95E-04 57.75 51.75 63 25 26.368 58.080 0 015 1770.290 1726 62 37 37 37 3953 8975.13 9.12E-04 57.75 51.75 64 26.3 25.240 57 577 0 018 1754.952 1726 62.37 36.07 38.23 6653.36 6.88E-04 57.75 51.75 65 27.4 24.131 57. 100 0 :)17 1740.402 1726 62.37 34.97 37.13 5164.65 5.43E-04 57 75 51.75 66 27.6 23.041 56.647 0 017 1726 614 1726 62.37 34.77 36.93 4932.20 5.27E--04 57 75 51.75 67 28.8 21.967 56.219 0 017 1713.560 1726 62.37 33.57 35.73 3741.46 4.06E-04 57.75 51.75 68 29.6 20.908 55.814 0 017 1701.216 1726 62.37 32.77 34 93 3112.01 3.42E--04 57.75 51.75 69 30.2 19.665 55.432 0 017 1689.560 1726 62.37 32.17 34.33 2710.45 3.02E--04 57.75 51.75 70 31.5 18.835 55.071 0 017 1678.570 1726 62.37 30.87 33.03 2009.26 2.27E--04 57.75 51 75 71 31.2 17.619 54.732 0 017 1668 227 1726 62.37 3117 33 33 2152.98 2.46E-04 57 75 51.75 72 31.9 16.815 54.413 0.017 1656.513 1726 62.37 30.47 32.63 1832.49 2. 12E-04 T-Mobile 1 effective ~diatkm towec center height minor lobe dB belO'N horiz. dist hyptonuse (feet), y (feet), y angle main lobe length (feet) 57.75 51.75 73 31.9 15.822 54.115 57.75 51.75 74 32 14.839 53.835 5775 51.75 75 32 13.866 53 576 57.75 51.75 76 31.9 12.903 53.334 57.75 51.75 77 31.6 11.947 53.111 57 75 51.75 78 32.2 11.000 52.906 57.75 51.75 79 32.2 10.059 52.719 57.75 51.75 60 32.5 9.125 52.54a 57.75 51.75 81 326 8196 52.395 57.75 51.75 82 31.3 7.273 52.259 57.75 51.75 83 32 6.354 52.139 57.75 51.75 84 32 5 5.439 52.035 57 75 51.75 85 32.6 4.528 51.948 57 75 51.75 86 33.6 3.619 51.876 57.75 51 75 B7 35.4 2.712 51.821 57.75 51.75 " 33.3 1.807 51.782 57 75 51.75 89 33 0.903 51.758 57.75 51.75 90 35.7 0.000 51 750 SE2545A Kennydale Adj to 2219 Meadow Ave N Renton, WA 98065 MPE Calculations ERP hypotenuse hypo;enuse main lobe length (km) 0 0~6 0 016 0.016 0 016 0 01(:i 0 016 0 016 0 016 0 016 0 016 0.016 0 OHi 0.016 0.016 o om 0 016 0 016 0 016 length (cm) 1649.411 1640 906 '.632 983 1625 628 1618 831 1612 579 1606 863 1601 673 1597 002 1592 841 1589.166 1586.028 1583.365 1581.192 ~579.505 1578 301 1577 580 1:':.77 340 T·Mobile 2 (watts) 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 ERP main lobe {dBm) 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62 37 62.37 62.37 62 37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62 37 Pa..rer at point x minor 1008 minor lobe minor lobe at ground level ERP{dBm) EIRP (dBm) EIRP(mW) mW/cm~2 30.47 32.63 1832.49 2 14E-04 30.37 32.53 1790 77 2.12E-04 30.37 32.53 1790 77 2.14E-04 30.47 32.63 1832.49 2.21E-04 3o.n 32 93 1963.54 2 38E-04 3017 32.3.3 1710.18 2.09E-04 3017 32.33 1710.18 2.11E-04 29.87 32.03 1596.03 1.98E-04 29 77 31.93 1559.70 1.95E-04 31.07 33.23 2103 98 2.64E-04 30.37 32.53 1100.n 2.26E-04 29.87 32.03 1596.03 2.02E-04 29.77 31.93 1559 70 1.98E-04 26.77 30.93 1238.91 1.58E-04 26.97 29.13 818.54 1.04E-04 29 07 3123 1327.52 1 70E-04 29.37 31.53 1422.46 1.82E-04 26.67 2B.83 763.91 9.77E-05 , ,,.. ADFDP182-6565B-XDM ""~•o•••~ ±45° Diversity, Quad Antenna • Provides two independent dual pol antennas under one radome for air combining • Each antenna is independently capable of field adjustable electrical down tilt • Fully compatible with Andrew TELETIL T® remote antenna control system . • Adjustable electrical downtilt -o• to 7• ELECTRICAL Frequency (MHz) : 1710 -1880 1850 -1990 Polarization : ±45° ±45° Gain (dBd/dBi) : 15.2/17.3 15.5117.6 Azimuth BW (Deg.): 67 65 Elevation BW (Deg.): 7 6.5 Beam Tilt (Deg.): 0-7 0-7 USLS* (dB): >17 >18 Front-To-Back Ratio* (dB): 30 30 Isolation (dB) : >30 >30 VSWR: <1.5:1 <1.5:1 PIM3 @ 2 x 20w (dBc) : -150 -150 Max. Input Power (Watts) : 200 200 Impedance (Ohms) : 50 50 Lightning Protection : DC Ground DC Ground MECHANICAL Weight: Dimensions (LxWxD) : Max. Wind Load (@ 100 mph) : Max. Wind Speed : Hardware Material : Connector Type : Color: Standard Mounting Hardware: RET Ordering Information Field Installed: Factory Installed, ATM100 Series: Factory Installed, ATM200 Series: 15.6 kg (34.5 lb) 1,371 x 304 x 88 mm (54 X 12 X 3.5 in) 725.0 N (163 lbf) 201 km/h (125 mph) Galvanized Steel 7-16 DIN -Female (4, Bottom) Off White 600899A-2 ADFDP182-6565B-XDM ADFDP182-65B-R1 DM ADFDP182-65B-R2DM Fax: 214.631.4706 1920 -2170 ±45° 15.7117.8 63 6 0-7 >18 30 >30 <1.5:1 -150 200 50 DC Ground Andrew Corporation 2601 Telecom Parkway Richardson, Texas U.S.A 75082-3521 Tel: 214.631.0310 Toll Free Tel: 1.800.676.5342 Fax: 1.800.229.4706 www.andrew.com ? '. .. ~ 'f i Information correct at date of issue but may be subject to change without notice. DECIBEL' Bas11 Station Ant11nnas J I .. . . .,~ ~ * -Indicates Typical 3/25/2005 dbtech@andrew.com A 'N 35th SI N 34th st N 33rd Pl . .fir 3-3rd St Z N 32nd SI ., -- ~ 0Kenn_~~~e lN 29th SI iij_ N 28th Pl 'ti ~ z z £ i L a k e Washington lfl, ~-i i\ '¢ I ! Exit ' ·,. SE2545A Kennydale Eldt6 Exit 6 ~ 3~~\Sf May Creek Park NEZ~ st NE ~7th St Sf2545A Kennydale 47.5117-122.1989 NE 24th St i!: (t> a. ~ NE 20th St f [D ;;;-:;· (t> ~ <.. ~ r <I> ffi z m " iii NE Wth St NE 12th SI -Newcastle SE 91st S\ St 95\\1 ~a'f m i-.. I ~ "' <t\ ~f sE9fM Way w en ., S' &. ?, St l .. ~ NE 23rct fl\ ! NE 24th St ., z m m Q. ~· g- f ~E ,._r;,oiS- Iii % 6), w iZ C: ~ NE 19th St w z ;,t, , _______ ---- -._i;;__ /.----------=~'--c '~ i I, I ,t;, I -~ '·-2 / <1100:> O') w z ., J: J 'f"<[lf -:~;:/ ' ,I!/.. Q\· ··,:--"' -----<·--:>, I 2/t--~ NE 12th St 900 ~ ' <llY ,~«; <;~-:eoo:. <-;~ -- ,.~ Renton S NE 10th St ,,&) I' 10 ;/ ·!<I> // ' )> // < // C, // /I ·I \~,::_---~~,;/ Omi 0.2 ffi ,t,~ I [ · NF: 1 Ofh SI ' ' ,, 0.4 1 10th ln "*' 0.6 il, "-1th St ..f 1--E 10th PJ NE 10th SI 0.8 Copyright© 1988-2001 Microsoft Corp. and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved. http://www.microsoft.com'slreets ©Copyright 2000 by Geographic Data Technology, Inc. All rights reserved.© 2000 Navigation Technologies. All rights reserved. This data includes informa1ion taken with permission from Canadian au1hol'it1es@ Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. @Copyright 2000 by Compusearch M1cromar1<eting Data and Systems Ltd. c-, = = IN ----------- When Recorded, Return to· Office of the City Clerk Renton City Hall 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W aslungton 98055 11 r 1111 IHII IIII HI 2002021100 618 CITY OF RiNTON DPC Zll.00 PAGE lel OF 012 02/11/2002 14:48 ~ING COUNT¥, WA DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS & RESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE TO THE BLUFFS, A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY Grantor BRE Properl:!es, Inc Grantee NIA Legal Descnptton ( abbreviated): l2J Additlonal on Schedule 1 Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#· 334450-0390-06; 334450-0345-02; 052305-9072-07, 052305-9034-04; 052305-9036-02, 334450-0080, 334450-0084-07; 334450-0093-06, 334450-0375-05, 334450-0395-01, 052305-9039-09, 334450-0415-07; 334450-0340-07 Reference Nos. of Documents Released or Assigned. ARTICLE 1. DECLARATION 1.1 This Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Easements & Restrictions ("Declaration'') 1s made on the date hereinafter set forth by BRE Properl:!es, Inc., a Maryland corporation, whrnh 1s the owner of all that certam real property located m the City of Renton, withm Kmg County and the State of Washington, commonly !mown as The Bluffs, a Res1denllal Community ("The Bluffs") and more particularly descnbed on SCHEDULE 1, attached hereto and mcorporated herem by tins reference 1.2 Owner wishes to adopt specific covenants, condittons and restnct1ons to guide the design, development and use of The Bluffs. en -= "" = = 1.3 Owner hereby declares r;cat al. of ,he real property w1thm The Bluffs shall be held, sold, leased, used and conveyed subJec, to the covenants, conditJons, restnct10ns, easements, reservations, charges and hens set forth m this Declarat10n (heremafter collect1vely referred to as "Covenants"). The Covenants shali mure to the benefit of and shall burden the real property w1thm The Bluffs and shall run wrth the !and and shall apply to and be bmdmg upon all part1es now or hereafter havmg or acqumng any nght, tJtle, or mterest m the real property wtthm The Bluffs or any part thereof, and shall be bmdmg upon their hem, successors and assigns, m perpetmty ARTICLE 2. PURPOSE AND INTENT 2.1 These Covenants are adopted for the mutual and reciprocal benefit and protecl!on of all present and future Owners, occupiers, users, and lessees ofrealpropertywttlun The Bluffs. The Covenants are mtended to protect the value of the property w1tlnn The Bluffs and to ensure that the property will be developed, used, occupied and improved m compliance with the Penmt Approvals 2.2 The purpose of the gmdelmes and cntena set forth m the Covenants contamed m this Declarat:Jon 1s (!) to ensure the preservatton and protectJon of the Greenbelt Areas on the Property, (2) to proVJde forJomt use by all residents m The Bluffs of the Recreational Ameruttes, and (3) to ensure that bmldmg extenors, common facihties and landscapmg are properly mamtamed and repaired ARTICLE 3. DEFINITIONS 3.1 "BUILDING(S)" means any bmldmg or improvements constructed on the ;::; Property 0 3.2 "COMMON FACILITIES" means those common recreanonal fac1httes located on the Property (such as pool and game room) as may be designated from time to time by Owner 3.3 "COVENANTS" means this DeclaratJon of Covenants, ConditJons, Easements and Restnct:Jons Apphcable to The Bluffs and all covenants, condtt10ns, easements and restnct10ns contamed herem 3.4 "GREENBELT" means that certarn portJon of the Property identtfied as greenbelt/steep slope area and cross-hatched on the site plan attached hereto as SCHEDULE 2 and legally descnbed on SCHEDULE 3. 3.S "PERMIT APPROVAL/PERMIT APPROVALS" means those certam City of Renton perrruts and governmental approvals apphcable to and imposed upon development wtthm The Bluffs 3.6 "OWNER" means BRE Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporatton, and its successors and assigns. In the event that Owner sells, conveys, transfers or assigns its interest as :2. - - Owner under these Covenants, Ownes shall thereafter have no further obhganon under this Declaration 3.7 "PROPERTY" means tliat certam real property legally descnbed m SCHEDULE I attached hereto, together with any and all beneficial nghts and easements appurtenant thereto. 3.8 "THE BLUFFS" means that cert am res1dent1al proiect constructed on the real property as legally descnbed on SCHEDULE I and shown on the site plan attached hereto as SCHEDULE2 3.9 INTENTIONALLY DELETED ARTICLE 4. CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 4.1 DENSITY; HEIGHT. The maximum overall residential density at full bwld-out of the Property shall be no more than 8 I dwellmg uruts per acre (winch is eqmvalent to a maxllllum of 180 uruts), and the maximum bmldmg height shall be 50 feet (with except10ns as permitted m the City of Renton Zomng Code), except as may otherwise be approved by the City ofRenton 4.2 ACCESS TO COMMON FACILITIES. Each resident of The Bluffs shall have a !muted hcense to access and use the Common Fac1hhes on a common basrn with all other residents, but only for so long as and to the extent that that md!vidual is a tenant of The Bluffs. The Owner may from time to llme establish reasonable rules govermng the time and manner of use of the Common Facihlles, mcludmg lim1tal!ons or prolubitions on use of the Common Faciltt1es by non-residents of The Bluffs, and residents' use of the Common Facihhes shall be conmtioned upon compliance with such rules and regulal!ons Nothmg herein shall be construed m any way to grant to any party any easement nghts or other rights of use or possess10n of the Common Fac1hnes. ARTICLES. Lk"I/DSCAPING 5.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN. A landscape plan for The Bluffs will be llllplemented m accordance with site drawmgs approved by the City of Renton. 5.2 MAINTENANCE. All landscaping located on the Property shall be mamtamed and imgated by the Owner and the Owner shall be responsible for ensunng that the ]andscapmg be kept m a healthy, attracl!ve condition and that the landscaped areas will be kept free of trash, htter, waste, and weeds. Owner shall replace any and all new landscaping that has died or has been severely damaged through llllproper mamtenance (1.e. llllproper or excessive prU!llng) - .,~':':..:::..z 5. MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS 6.1 REGULAR MAINTENANCE REQUIRED. The maintenance, upkeep, and repa!T of the Bwldmgs and the Common Facilities shall be the sole responsibihty of the Owner The Owner shall keep the Bmldmgs and the Cow.man Fac1Itties, mcludmg but not limited to recreat10n areas, parlang and pedestnan areas, and all Bmldmg extenors, m a good state of repair and m a safe, clean, neat and sarutary condit10n at all tunes The Owner shall clean, mamtam and repair all extenor walls and roofs of all Bmldmgs on the Property. Owner shall replace, at Owner's expense, any glass or wmdows or doors that may become cracked or broken, and shall repaint, repair or otherwise restore the "extenor shell" of any Bmldmg witbm a reasonable tJ.me after Owner receives notice that such pamtmg or restorat10n is warranted ARTICLE 7. GREENBELT RESTRICTIONS 7.1 PROHIBITED USES. These Restnctions impose upon all present and futirre owners and occupiers of the Greenbelt au obhgat1on to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetat10n withm the Greenbelt (the ProtectJ.on RestnctJ.on"). The vegetat10n withm the Greenbelt may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or dainaged without express wntten penmss10n from the City of Renton, winch permission shall not be unreasonably withheld, condttJ.oned or delayed The Protection RestnctJ.on shall run wrth the land and shall be bmding on all present and futirre owners and occupiers of the Greenbelt. Except as specifically permitted m Section 7 2 below, the following uses and practJ.ces in the Greenbelt shall be prolub1ted. 7.1.1 The placement, installation or constructJ.on of any bmldmgs, structirres, or other nnprovements of any kind (mcludmg, without lumtatJ.on, roads and parkmg lots) 7.1.2 The installatJ.on of any ut1hty system or component or item of such a system mcludmg, without lumtatJon, water, sewer, drainfield, electncal power, fuel or commun1catJ.ons, except as reqwred by apphcable law 7.1 3 Logging, pruning, or cutting of any timber, shrubs, grasses or other flora. 7 1 4 Any residential, agncultural, commercial or mdustnal use of, or actiVJty on, the Greenbelt 7 1 5 Construction of any roads, trails, or paths for velucular use 7.1.6 The gradmg or other alteration of the terrain and existing landforms of the Greenbelt, including, without li1Illtat1on, the excavation or removal of soil, sand, gravel, ro~ peat or sod, except as may be reqlllfed m the course of any actJ.v1ty permitted herem ', 1' <CJ ..... = = 7 1 7 Pavmg of any surface on the Greenbelt 7.1.8 The sale of the Greenbelt separate and apart from the remamder of the Property without the pnor wntten approval of the City of Renton The restnc!lons contamed m thts Sechon 7 1 shall run with the land and shall be bmdmg on all present and future owners and occupiers of the Greenbelt 7.2 PERMITTED USES. Notw1thstandmg any other proviswn ofthrs Declaratton, Owner reserves the nght to use the Greenbelt as follows: 7 2 I Wrth the express wntten approval of the City of Renton, winch approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditwned or delayed, to construct, use, mamtam, repair and reconstruct other improvements as necessary to mamtarn, preserve, and enJoy the wildlife values of the Greenbelt 7 2.2 To eradicate or control non-native mvasive species present on the Greenbelt. 7 .2.3 With the express wntten approval of the City of Renton, winch approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, condittoned or delayed, to cnt or prune shrubs, grasses, dangerous trees or other flora necessary to preserve the natural habitat of the Greenbelt, to prevent shde hazards, to protect pubhc health or safety, or as acttvely required by and subiect to compulsion of any governmental agency with authonty to require such activity and use 7 2 4 With the express written approval of the City of Renton, which approval shall not be unreasonably Withheld, conditioned or delayed, to undertake other actJVItres necessary to prevent eros10n, shde, or flood hazards, or to protect pubhc health or safety on the Greenbelt or adJacent pubhc or pnvate property, or which are actively reqmred by and subject to compuls1on of any governmental agency with authonty to reqmre such ac!tVlty and use 7 .2.5 To remove any wastes, refuse, or otber debns from tbe Greenbelt. 7 2.6 With the express wntten approval of tbe City of Renton, winch approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed, to construct fences and other secunty measures 7.2.7 To construct, mamtam and operate unpaved pnvate trarls for use by residents of The Bluffs, their guests and mvrtees Nothmg herem shall be construed to impose any obhgat10n on Owner to conduct any of the foregomg actt vrlles 7.3 NOTICE OF INTENT TO UNDERTAKE PERMITTED ACTIVITIES. "" = N = ·= N 7 3.1 Owner shall mufy the City pnor to undertakmg certam penmtted act1v1nes or uses as provided m Sect10n 7 hemn, except that such notice 1s not reqmred where Owner cannot reach the City and must undertake emergency act10n to prevent, abate, or rmllgate sigruficant mJury to persons, the Greenbelt, or abuttIDg properties The purpose of such notifica!Jon is to afford the City an opportumty to ensure that the activ11Jes or uses m quest10n are designed and earned out ID a manner consistent with the purpose of this Declarat10n Whenever nonce is reqmred, Owner shall nollfy the City m wntmg not less than ten (1 OJ days pnor to the date Owner mtends to undertake the act!Vlty or use m quest10n The nonce shall descnbe the nature, scope, design, location, and tID1etable of the proposed acllvity. ARTICLES. DURATION AND AMENDMENT OF COVENANTS 8.1 DURATION OF COVENANTS. These Covenants shall be perpetual 8.2 AMENDMENT. Tins Declaral<on and any or all of its provisions may be amended only in a wntten, recorded amendment executed by the Owner and the City of Renton ARTICLE 9. NOTICES All nol!ces given under the prov1s10ns of these Covenants shall be m wntmg and may be dehvered either personally or by mail If delivery is made by mail the nol!ce shall be deemed to have been dehvered upon bemg deposited m the Uruted States mail, first class, postage prepaid, addressed to the person entttled to such notice at the address set forth below. Mailmg addresses may be changed by nol!ce ID wnllng Ifto Owner. Ifto City. BRE Properties, Inc 400 North 341h Street, Smte 200 Seattle, Washmgton 98103 Attn Mr Pete Rocereto City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way, 6th Floor Renton, W ashmgton 78055 Attn· Plannmg/Bmldmg/Pubhc Works Adrmrnstrator or Successor Title ARTICLE 10. INTENTIONALLY DELETED ARTICLE 11. MISCELLA.i'IEOUS 11.1 ACCEPTANCE OF PROVISIONS BY GRANTEE($). Each grantee of any part or pomon of or mterest m The Bluffs, and any lessee under any lease covenng any part or porllon of or mterest m The Bluffs shall accept the same subject to all of the restnc!Jons, condJ.l!ons, covenants, reservations, easements, liens and charges set forth in these Covenants, /p - and by such acceptance for itself, its hens, personal representatives, successors and assigns, agrees with O'wner and with the gramce(s) and subsequent Owners of any part or portion of or mterest m The Bluffs to keep, observe and comply with these Covenants, and to perform all obbgat1011s 0111ts part thereunder. 11.2 CONSTRUCTION. The provisions of these Covenants shall be construed to effectuate the purpose and mtent of these Covenants set forth m Arhcle 2. 11.3 SEVERABILITY. If any provis1011 of this Declarat10n shall be adJudged to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent Junsd1ct10n for any reason, the validity of all other provisions, covenants, cond1t1ons, and restncllons shall not be affected and shall remain m full force and effect 11.4 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. Tius Declarallon and the Covenants contamed herem shall inure to the benefit of and be bmdmg upon the heirs, personal representatives, grantee(s), lessees, successors and assigns of the Owner. In the event The Bluffs 1s at any time converted to condomimum form of ownership, Owner may assign 1ts obligallons under this Declarallon to the owners' assoc1at1on established m counecllon with such condommmm, and thereafter Owner shall be relieved of any obhgat10ns hereunder 11.5 NOT A PUBLIC DEDICATION. Nothmg herem contained shall be deemed to be a gift or dedication of any port10n of The Bluffs to the general public or for the general pubhc or for any pubhc purpose whatsoever, 1t bemg the mtention of Owner that this Declarallon shall be stnctly limited to and for the purposes herem expressed The Owner shall have the nght to close the Common Fac1h1:Ies and Greenbelt at such reasonable tl!Iles as to prevent a ded1cat10n for a public purpose. 11.6 CHOICE OF LAW. This Declaration shall be governed by the Jaws of the State ofWaslungton 11.7 NO THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARIES. Nothmg contained m tlus Declaration shall be construed to render any tlurd party a beneficiary to tlus Declarallon or the Covenants contained herem, nor grant any such third party any nghts or remedies under tlus Declarallon 11.8 ENFORCEMENT. Any v10lat10n or breach of these restncllve covenants may be enforced by either the City of Renton or any property owner adversely affected by such breach SCHEDULES SCHEDULE I LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SCHEDULE 2 THE BLUFFS SITE PLAN SCHEDULE 3 GREENBELT DESCRIPTION SCHEDULE 4 INTENTIONALLY DELETED 1 <n -= "' = = - ~ .,.., = "' = c;:) <"" C.oLDl?.Aht> STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ))eoNVE?.. ) ss. COUNTY OF *fNO ) By_-f'------""---"----"--.:::_--"-------- Name: ,Pete Rocereto Title Vice President On thIS day personally appeared before me Pete Rocereto, to me known to be the Vice President of BRE Properties, Inc, the Maryland corporat10n that executed the foregomg mstrument, and acknowledged such mstrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of such corporat10n, for the uses and purposes therem ment:Joned, and on oath stated that he was duly authonzed to execute such mstrument. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 30,11,day of ,J®llllY) 2001 16427.3v3 0 1 1 NOTARY PUBLIC m and for the State of "-blDfMDJ,lhtsfnngten, res1dmg at ]>e1wey CJ, v..nf-f My Comnussmn Expires------- Jana M. Tebbe My Commission Expires Aprtl 12, 2005 3CHcDULE 1 DODDS CONSUL TING ENGINEERS, INC., PS BELLEVUE WA 98007 DCE Project No. 97169 8/31/98, Rev 02/02/2002 Consolidated Legal Description for The Bluffs Tracts 317 through 322, 334 through 335, 344 through 346, and 348 through 353, C.D H1lmans Lake Washington Garden of Eden, D1v1s1on No 5 according to the plat thereof as recorded m Volume 11 of Plats, page 83, records of King County, Washington, AND that portion of the Pacific Coast Railroad Company's Newcastle Branch nght- of-way being a stnp of land 200 feet wide bounded on the north by the westerly production of the north lme of said tract 334 and on the south by the westerly production of the south lme of said tract 317; AND that portion of Third Avenue (AKA NE 20th Street and SE 104th Street) lying within said railroad nght-of-way; EXCEPTING THEREFROM, any portion of the above descnbed property lying easterly of the westerly margin of Primary State Highway No 1 (SR 405) and westerly of the easterly margin of Lake Washington Blvd. North, TOGETHER WITH those portions of vacated Lake View Boulevard which attach thereto by operation of law. SUBJECT TO City of Renton Lot Line Ad1ustment LUA-00-093-LLA as recorded under Recorder's No. 20001018900004 and subject to a boundary lme agreement as recorded under Recorder's No. 20010425001979, all in records of King County, Washington All situate in Government Lots 2, 3, and 4 of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. 'I = = "" = = - f ! f ! f 1 f ! f ;l.r.. I f I / / I 1 ' ! / ,Q f '.!. ' f / so-::.cu....:; 2 i ! / ,, ; I I I :J 'I I I z : .1 : ~ Iii i : !.:~ ~ -,1 !u. I 'I w ' l I 1: r • 11: m m i I ' U. I I ; u. I I j 'I : .l m I I r/. 'I : w I (l j ', I r I <D fN = = r / ,/ I ! I l - :·// // . ' I I I lf .~-------... _ r " ' l_ 3Ci-'EDIJLE 2 \ : cs '--• J ·-, '~ ·~-/ -""-. C'J = = C'J r SCHEDULE 3 DODDS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, ING., PS BELLEVUE WA 98007 Legal Description for The Bluffs Greenbelt DCE ProJect No. 97169 01/21/2002 Rev 02/04/2002 Tracts 334 through 335, G.D. Hilmans Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Dw1s1on No 5 according to the plat thereof as recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 83, records of King County, Washington, AND that portion of the Pacific Coast Railroad Company's Newcastle Branch rrght- of-way being a strrp of land 200 feet wide bounded on the north by the westerly production of the north lme of said tract 334 and on the south by the westerly production of the south hne of said tract 336, AND that portion of Third Avenue (AKA NE 20th Street and SE 104th Street) lying w1thm said railroad right-of-way, EXCEPTING THEREFROM; any portion of the above descnbed property lying easterly of the westerly margin of Primary State Highway No 1 (SR 405). All situate in Government Lots 2, 3, and 4 of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W M in the Crty of Renton, King County, Washington o• J Tne pp 1a ~9;;,425 ilf wcli. i10,occ ;:.;;,, ,,ze!lp/i r~apt ~<lk "O::. the bel or fS;,425 to be f4 $600 ino int at ,b, rt ct 41,' f8 Oll det bal on Deo .l JiQ; tha e11m ot $10 000 on Jen ,1 47; ,;;» aum ct $600 er mo.re ino int !ilS 11.f'rad on Jen i 47 ard t!u ztt~ the s\1.111 ~ $6CO or mDre on tbll lat ot eeoh mo ino int as ,.;;;st ::::;: the e.ntj.re r.mnt ot prin ~d int illls been fully pd ID.\ o»: det pey II ahll be oomputaa frmJ.iiov l J+,:, Peytll to be eppld t.·.c ~t to peyt ot int end rem to red ot pri.D Pl'vd11 fOJI add P!I .Yh ot 1/12 tl:i. r,unua l ti::s and l/)6th ct 3 'fl fire 1.D.<, prim to be ~djua1ied a11 neo UDdra1id by end betwn the i: rtie a llr to th5 t tp. ill pur the bv des P1'•m. Ulld1 a :e c,ont 'Gil cont seller sgreea to pe'f eoord to t:ms tl:i.rot and dis~ o! reo b.t tilliil peyt is mi de on thie ont. Pesa or. Nc:Y J, 46 sub to exiatin& tenanoiea endlee&ee 11' ant Sp to pay bt' del ell ua end ese!lilJta, eGsllllli!a ell l!D..ilrda ot dam.sea ei dait:ruo ti 0.11 of any 1mpmu ta . and ts !ring ot s.d pr am tr an, pt rt th:ot .to:r pub Ulla Sp to kee;i prm :Lu Prvds r o: int; at 10% pe on detlJ. E!ir hes m de tull 1nstpe ot!on of sd pemall4 ia s•t with = Fp wit ln 60 days frm dt hot to .lD! oo a pill' pol or 1i 1t l.i 1.::: Ep c:u'~.i:1 ;e y ot pp -to lll8kll 11:iceo aod del to pur G good end eut' w4 Tm is tba eeee.11011 with prove tac trttr Domld Edwerd Zieberth Florenne Helen Ziebe:rill c • .M,Liaoe Nellie r.i.1soo ko'!f N:QV 2 46 bf D0_.t1Bl~ Edward Ziebarth end Flo;renoe Heleu Ziebe:rtll : \If Zeth$ FU zgereld np t tr ew _res a , s na NGY 27 49 . :! kaw · Nil\' 2 46 \ly c.M. Lis oo and !lellie I .L!soo bt Zel;h# J'itzg11rell ::j1 np to: tile sw l'BII st e :Us Nov 29 49 (ml sp )300 E Ol.1Te) . ----,\ ,_ JJv~<> g ; ~ -:5Y ;i 362;0;9 ? j / 1 1 ' ' , D Nov 2 J+6 Oc,t 1; J+6 $lo ~ .55 1.rs •• ;o s1i Peoitio Coe st R.B.Oo. ,a v.n crp to SaiDAlibey 9Ild Brents .A\lliey, bit Fp O'f end qo to sp ell int il1 the tl dss :a 'l'lB t .pt,n ot. l?a.oifi o Coesi; R. R. Co'• I,ewoestle Brano r/w being e st.rip !>i: sd r/• 200 t1i in width 100 .f't ~ euoh wid. · lying on e1 i;•IJ.al side. ot the r/w oenfi ln es the smis now loo and bn oa i.ile N of ~ ~ 1n ct T1i #)33, c. D. Hillmen'" Lake Wesh1;;gtoii Ga:duGi' E>il?il Add,Ilh No. S s reci plat fio kow prod Wly over aD4 aoroaa ad !!/W JID4 1 c11 the s by the sly lnof Tt #)36. of sd Garden or Edf.;1 Add, Div Bo. 5 prod Wl: over sDd across sd r/w.,, Cont 4.20 ac:r•s ot land, JP].. ~opt}.llg thrtrs· ell mineral righ;. s end sub to e oer\ eeemt permittill:Ci the iereot1 on, ue end meintamn oa or e powel' line o,er eti.d eor111• ' th! ea re woh easmt was grntd ti;, 1!'g PSR:L Coe orp on .Ten 17 )8 l?eoitio Coast R.B. Co. bf G. W, Merte~e, pr~• orp al. by H.M.Watkins, etlllf kow. Oot 15 46 bf G. w. Merfiens end H.K. Wetk!ml p11ea and e1101 ot eel orp(ot) bt ZIJ.llian G. Nye np tor ihe ew res et• .na len 19 49 tml sp 5 05 No ?ls I; t ) ---• RR ii ' ' I 'il I C. I "' al I • !c; I \ " I • _I l l 0 • 'i' ' l ~ R g 0 I ~ " • • I ha . .,., i ' I "' ~ < I I r;i B a -( ... ... ··.···~ 1 ·, •. :;:: ;· 5· 1 .r,q1(111"''T ~Jl"'11 I 'il C. I "' C. ~ §_.-:.- I I I I -::E I I ~o I I ~::: I I -jl ~ I I I I L>I I _I _, _I 8 ' o/P. C.R.R. "r ! i • -~ al i C. "' -,__-- qQt,-. .JO ~,·,1' t I I l •j• I =-~l I I I -1-- -- ,.r,11•'1 .. ,I C. -,, ,, 7:J • ' Printed: 12-28-2006 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUAOG-173 Receipt Number: R0606341 Total Payment: 12/28/2006 01 :03 PM 1,200.00 Payee: WIRELESS FACILITIES INC Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review Payments made for this receipt Trans Payment Method Check Account Balances Trans Account Code Description #070045 Description 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use or Fence Review 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 Amount 1,200.00 Amount 1,000.00 200.00 Balance Due .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 . 00 .00