No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA96-078 • • .. . PLANT MATERIAL MT • • Winn Gods Botaicel Nam Gannon Na,. Size Remmico DICE DBS®AS 11150Bt61 PTRO.NAND MASON MAR DARDERRY D.SPE NORTH PAL EOKLTG Y PLADJU CGPALTA DWARF RINSED B1051Mh.29•HST. 1 • Scale:l'=20'0" / / di, .25PWIS HORRONTALB WLTa. ' DOLE 015..LIVER I GAL Ac OL CCNIN101Y SP1CN6 / / / / / - FL PRWY LIFITANCA PORN60L LA RB. #HGT. — . / / /r / ' PNA PENS KW MKO DWARF MAO FM B•SPR. NOT SFEARED / / / / • MC PA.1AFo 5®AA.ATA KWANZAN K 00000 ORERRY r LPL G.H 1(RAFT / h ` / 4 • / /-• 2 - / / 61•,0 T L/ are e{A / of i mr ue rntz wiz.A,ArrraMa I t!^^ / / /•/ FT �® TO uwr.ors Os 3 , • / /eg / / / ` 40 Jv W-eiw TOP PP Da,"Mr, PNWI WMo6tF1 'Va / / / `/ / / / / ilwl zO v�.qt..7 E r vv.Tiud�.00 / / / 8 / / / / /' wrnrmTm m�armo &' ,,A?J / / / / / / / __ R I .. 6'Nil P . I a / p °o 2 J IM "JOWL 41t / ImeDrALWA.WB.ee�,1� / / / / / �/ „Bo- / \ e O I Ktt PLANING DETAIL g / / / //�?y / \� Z p PLAN REVIEW NOTES "... / i i /, / \// // .2 \\/ \\ O • ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO BE COVERED BY AN AUTOMATIC fRAGATON AeoleBWiHroA¢nl- / / �� �} / �` i—D SYSTEM TO INDUSTRY STANDARD WITH LESS THAN BO GPM APPLED WI OP Meal �wtg > PER ZONE,TAVERNG ALL MANTN6S. // / • 5EE SHEET Al FOR FINAL.SITE DIMENSIONS AND LEGAL DESORPTION d h / // /" / \ / /// �- �1 • 5rtE CONTAINS NO E%IZTN6 VEGETATION 6.M� �� r'P' k. ��l y h `/ l/� / / I • SEE SLEET N FOR UTLITES AND RELATED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. / /� \\N. /// J� • rt.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,•.�WA.r�,toRe. I a �l\ /// \ I 4 MY�L �w. rTora- N,vr, JO \ o TC � � .. tie "T� \I _ SHRUB PLANING DETAIL B\\ // A ,q�G, NOTES ON LANDSCAPE WORK °� \NB 'I). / •^ " LOCATE UTLITES AND MODIFY WORK AZ NEEDED TO AVOID CONFLICT e \ Flo, I-P,K �1 WORK NLLUDES INSTALLING I-I/2'DEEP BARK NIA.LH LAYER CONTINUOUS IB ' (' N ALL NON TURF LAKE/SCAM AREAS THROUGH OUT. N Q2 '\ \/l/U / *) • READ N CONAINCTION WITH LANDSCAPE WORK SPECIFBATIONS .a Pt H IO,, • SEE OTHER PLANS FOR ALL SITE ELEMENTS(WALKS,PAVN6,TRASH 2 \\ �.�,,, ENCLOSURES_UTI TIES,ETC,OTHER THAN PLANTINGS a LANDSCAPE ^n 0 BRNfi ALL DISLREPANLES,SU66ESTIONS,OVESTIONS,GRANGES.PND ft t3 1 b •\ WORK OATIONS TO OWNER FOR RESOLUTION PRIOR TO WORK. Q p WORK NLLIDES WYORTNG TOPSOL FOR THIS WORK NO TOPSOIL IS •. \ S (j 11-R AVAILABLE ON SITE ., .. Fo.T ..:0 •• INSTALL.PLANTINGS N ACCORD WITH PLANTING DETAILS Z i F h m ;•.::::.;'.'o f. R PAL LEGEND .0�C�,�;. ART:ASSOCIATES -rx •�•1•'�t:!n' OOT LONTOVRS TTPWu. NSTaL TYPE JN,.awcov COMM.,AT 3P QJ CENTER Me PWKW and Landscape A"NIMve J.- �`V)INC2 - NW.SrentewP A."u,WIZ 200 Pg1INW D,e1m DIU9-BOO , Landscape Plan v 1 Casey Group Arch dtects Architecture And Pia r wimg Li 4.1 (LIMIT (I. CF...VOW ..PS WALL Pi= ' FAINTED -Ln -C0.4100 0411TER 1,NIED 1 i . STEEL ROCF PANELS sTwa • I 'I HOIAIMIIIIII 1-.- . '' • . . . =: Z Lnr=.I • - -4 - 1 .-.,, -s- FILL LITE P.ELS EXIST,.0,1,.. tLI/MO,SLATS 4,, PAINTED hall-AMP STEEL PALELS < < < < METAL SI,”. Somali West Ellevainem ,A„., South East EllevEtioim SM.,. (LEMIT LG ADDITIOLO i “PS WALL PACK I 1 . 1.IST.PAWED : :.eya'm:m:E*1 I M I=I M 0 0 a 0•X:2: : : . •._ EnSIT14 _ IEXISTING GAS MTER .,,,,Z) NEW RILL UTE°GOBLE (i3 g 000.FOR 51.1ROOM a LEW trOWLIXR4T WW00. ,,,,,,.., A Norralln East Ellevationn North West Ellevegiom 0 3 I 8 El I. a N 1 g e 2 r= - , r (. . 1. i A i ? i 71 ° , H \ '? Q PASSENGER SERVICE BAYS U Q. g i 10-6 4 I; f Bervfice I my Cross Sectfioim • ' CalSey Group Aprellineetto Architecture And Planning A3 • .....• N89°50'24"Ui PAINTED TRAFFIC LME 2661.9m' - - 200B33' e..+e..+ 9DLID TELLOW E89'50'24"E Z° S®UTIAI 9Nh S IET / ; �" m Fir!Fi .s.o — ' AddIltIl®Ill t® y -,4„,4,. . Remt®n Lee Ec�I�wEb . a o /' .' r .—%...,..., _Ilme CeII1 ter 4 4 4 4 (,4iyy q /11 ''.; \ . 4, omm,an.cv STA'Q QQ°CS nmm., na emu..n ILEUv�D m 4ies .�v '/.1!'/' a s {-EXISTING om.w.wu .0..mw..n lae.. .o..,m '-'. .a..n.+ `� " ,4. ASPHALTS lir .... •LP .> . i it tee• . Q % . /I�'Na ,. .d.....� �",�.o...n. a o l'I r _ ..n<ras. .=.....,...a= aa.. . . .�.e �m W. 9, i ros. • (Adnro •tivM • I 0 :ys• a ; ENEW ABPHAL v n,,,.,.o.ne.eunw e.r,,.nn�. T°O •' ..uc..v.wra...w..evro. a.aw+v.�..wn • y PAVING(NOW tl I e. .:` i �~i. GRAVEL F C7 Qri ` , .\ ' v[•^'61BAYAD3111II®1( G} __ .".c w.wae.w.:1 .t."41,.wrua:=2 .on o...e•n w,...s.,wn...n.. ns m..a� o/ / uam aw+• o+�ers..mwn m.�w,w•renom.wv um • r�_r ...wu..s.0 9 �J .r O V.tfe./ E e3 va.W•�.. �"; ;. l 4 a�...,... • • ExIBTnJG DEEM OF MAIER= VIICINTICY HAP � � 9UBAfdI/PEUGEOT '�'9.Zvi d, e. S' \ .. .. .. ELIILDMG S :r AI COVER SWEET/SITE PLAN {{��}} ::.:::.;• NEW LA?OECAFE AREA•.WOW So.,. A, FLOOR PLAN AND NOTES - ��S 2 {3i; a• a .. I 1V !}:{:::}:::::;::' A3 E%TEROR ELEvarmN AND C SECTION B.lthvi-t QT� O A n it c� ?limn LI LANDSCAPE PLAN 6 J SCALE I'•l0'-0• ® .ouna.ciov CI CIVIL FLAN S.GRA”..." u-. / • .r. �' F. .. 11 0 3 0 I Q:zoey Group Arrellitteelts Architecture And Planning All � 1, • d s a iFi e.u..c.w.v..o m�..• II.E G IE N 6 i. ` _--- IJNm ____ r.aroa`wc..c.rar I f`w� — v„„„,,,,-rox�a.o a a a a F7&W=VIM Fr..F.S oc�.oa..ae-e-n II t t ,,_, AND AIIIII IC fl_�' men cq I— Q L1 a� / ^0'b 21 a. ytl. W�a Y\ g 2 re,woa ma* I IRE 870.64 IN OPEN rer AL RACKS k, .,...,Z-7" . h'''''''..-''''''''''l g _ - • GCO�Cs �AMA . , . V: ?, - i g N o(38:1 �t:y Di ''1-1 1Ru®®o?Dam I Calsey Group Arrelifittects Architecture And Planning AU A • • - - /-z 646._„sw -' �"�'----_r.8=EL 1011D- EXIST '41 . .5,' \ RIN ELEV=22.5,9 -SOLID YELL04 PAINTED / .'S CCMECT B'W TO 12'CP FRN NE ELEV=19.78 I TRAFFIC LINE 12'CP TO SW ELEV=19,83 CB SDLID LID / - IX6T 18'' 6'CP FRM SSW ELEV=19.73 P RIM FLEV=22.• / x•.-- 'I•'4.5' �-_� MST FM LEGEND 12°CP FNJ NE/ELEV=AM j •/ .--. 1j -CRICKED 12'CP TO S�ELEV;1Bbe /• % _ l i AFC _ RR=2d77'gg�41g5' ® =CATCH BASIN `' = 77'S3' pq =GAS VALVE o / / •, / / / / RIM ELEV=21.dd •LP -LIMINAR CB 6°LP OUT ELEV=20.23 ® =POWER VAULT 10.5' X 4,5. _ RIM ELEV=21.72 / / / n/ ' SiTtf / r\ / 6'CP FRM SE FLEV=20.33 m -STREET L I CNT HAND HOLE 0 6'CP OUT SE ELEV=19.62 / / / 6'CP UM SW ELEV=20.13 �' r ` / o =WATER METER z / .-6 EXTRUDED CURB . / ><' 21 .✓ '1' OVERHEAD SIGN ® =MONITORING WELL / / :`/ ; / P ai�•FORD LINCOLN MERCCRY' GRAPHIC SCALE / / .���� /"', ,� i 20 m 20 40 w O -SET 5/8' REBAR W/CAP "MULLEN 18913' \ � / / h, • Nqe -;.1'49'47," Z4'a _C5 _ � =379.34 II [CDC RASE I f,,,, RIM ELEY=21.78 _ / ke / ,.,� �a'.,,�+<� t=144.52' Y{� 15'GNP IN ELEV=18.98 (DEBT) V ® / / % ', ' I� 3' 3' �LP l- ,.� IS'Cif OUT ELEV=1B.93 Offal) tL" N0��7/. / , CONO PAD �2 �,, / '=/a°, '$ ., // r, I�-OVEREAD SIGN 5.� Boo/ / 1.EASEMENTS,ROADS,RESTRICTIONS,RESERVATIONS AND HAZARDOUS WASTE 111 / .' /•�� / • ��- 1, 'LES SWAB TIRES' 07 DEPOSITS,IF ANY,ARE NOT SHOWN EXCEPT AS INDICATED. a,' � / % -f / ••y ro``''. P.IM ELEY=2I.31 2.UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS,RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PATENTS .4' tr / / ./� / �,,o'" c, /L/ ,,� fi'CP OUT ELEV=19.76 '1ili Z AC-PVIAT 2. ACTS AUTHORIZING CLAIMS, ISSUANCE THEREOF,WATER RIGHTS,CLAIMS ". - • 4' /'� a` / ,/ /. / I' AC-PVFR OR TITLE TO WATER,IF ANY,ARE NOT SHOW EXCEPT AS INDICATED. s h1` / ' 1 SAWN 3.INDIAN TRIBAL CODES OR REGULATIONS,INDIAN TREATY OR ABORIGINAL �`' / 6/ / LANFSCAPDD RIGHTS,INCLUDING EASEMENTS OR EQUITABLE SERVITUDES IF ANY,ARE NOT & // / �• / / �.a/•] P I LP SHOWN EXCEPT AS INDICATED. • / / / / / // HAS M•TER - 24•e /; /WITH L�.I AROS 4.BASIS OF'BEARING NORTH LINE OF SECTION 19,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE s c?' / /' NEW6W / / . ;�,/ /F�/� ./ m CpM BAG' 5 EAST,W.M.,IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON g / P / / 'c2- / � M, I 5.EOUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES USED:TOPCON GTS-3C 5'EDM/CLOSED S / / /J , ��E UST PAYT FIELD TRAVERSE.LAST CALIBRATION MAY•1994. '''_ / // / /� / q: e/ EDGE����cc..,, B.ALL MONUMENTS VISITED DURING MAY OF 1995. • i .' ,yg• / / .° ��"� PAVEMENT\ EXTRUDED CURB d^ j1` BAFFP.€O1L'/WATERYfDR �J/- �� �' GATE _ • 7.ALL LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE THOSE OBTAINABLE BY SURFACE / / / / / / / ulj,'9 / �!' CB EVIDENCE ONLY,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. F, ' R(M ELEV=^1.58 / //i ".'� :` / 8,CP IN SELY ELEV=I9.58 B.NO RELIC RECORDS ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE CITY OF RENTON FOR WATER.SANITARY p CB 5OLI0/L ID / / ....‘2, !/,,x5 / �/ , c^, 15 l�OUT h1'L'!ELEV-19.56 SEWER,OR STORM DRAIN. 5 1iIM EELEY=21.85 �: //^ 46 ' 12'CP TO S ELEV=I6.Jp�0J 1(SAW AND / 'S T 6't,'• . INRUFENCE 1'2'CP FNN N,ELEV=18.50 f MAC EXIST/ ,/ A W y,17p1 ' ;?';'.: COPYRIGHT C 1085 BY MULLEN ASSOCIATES SURVEYORS c, CB / / �>n /`aF'�,p+' .' x //a.• _ As•, RIM ELEV=21.31 // io: CO e',. POT / •` •• •',`.; / LEGAL DESCRIPTION U NO PIPES FOUND /. ' 'ice .//A ELEC mums sER 7- ' ,-'"'"'`: X IIII `• TO BE RELOCATED t.g°' c0�t-TYPE t eIl.aev= As9. .D m.� - O"' CONNECT FEY'SD ~ 6 OU LE',(.=:'+9,•; a /' , '',.'�;�7Aq n.�' FLEET POWER VAULT THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, TO EXIST CBAO, i`, - '' ; •1'�^' ," `• S.4'x 19,6' RANGE 5 EAST,W.M.,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; 2'X 5'VAULT '.'�' /, -P'.Mg`' '.� :Lh.. /.• - - CONC PAYTTNEW T BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION WHICH BEARS _ x7Y '�22 NORTH 89'50'24'WEST 2008.4 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; r� D.A� `. - PST A 5741' �T. ���`"'4f =\, THENCE SOUTH 0409'36'WEST 30 FEET TO THE SOUTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 7th CABLE F C '�` `F➢9E`OH .�� � . -' '`? %"+�I, STREET(SOUTHEAST 144th STREET); YEUENL,:. �� ��`I9 AG-F M7 VERfEAD ?• t-,,,KS; �• d 1 � - THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID MARGIN ON A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF Gl1 �� �,,,& 379.34 FEET THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 26'4B'35'AN ARC DISTANCE OF 17750 I,� ,r• •' !TF'ut•S FEET TO TFE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; ++��,�� �_:.t'::'i,.-;' ':•:',':,.Sr CB =-TYPE 1 / ACC �,,��`i7'•`,�C''"' :c - -:? PoM=2L30 THENCE CONTINUING ON SAID CURVE ALONG SAID STREET MARGIN AND ALONG THE 0 �:+t%' G \�• t '$aC'I EASTERLY MARGIN OF RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 21'49'42 b� ��� V 1! CB AN ARC DISTANCE OF 144.52 FEET; - q Ay \ � - RIM ELEV=21.81 �`�° : EL FRET Y /B'CP EV ELEV=20.16 THENCE SOUTH 41'25'38'WEST,123.37 FEET; g / c -y / THENCE SOUTH 55441'30'EAST 235.44 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH rr7A, \ .�'���, °"`""`'� `F'v+^` /' / 0'09'36'WEST 312.98 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. • 9. \ w,r _ "3', /® THENCE NORTH 0'09'38'EAST,312.95 FEET TO'THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. o SUBUtU/PEUOEOT \'``-A. .H SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. - .'s, _LNISCAPINS(TIP) AREA-32,B84sq.tt. 0.7545 scree • SOLID LO0O74G COVER \ • 6'CHAINLINT;FENCE GIN EXTRUDED CIBQTLTED UP \r ' g& 6'DIAINLIMc FENCE 4 AED SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 0 ' E l o AEE DRAWN BY DATE 0-19-90 SCALE: SHEET 1 CID LES SCHWAS LS Co. SHEET as,4, i I ,,BY HORIZ. El=Cosult/noEigHSTS P « N RENTON LES SCHWAB c-� at1-+n-91c2 66-447-VJm to.rI�'p 6-19_98 ��,t' �,•LR';r. ••; VERT. 1�71 Third Avarua Suite 900 T a N1111TiS CBITHi1 LCCATEDN •• RJL 6-19-96 JOB NO.; Seattle.WastNngta198D1 INDEPENDENT 0AP' 1., n-•N R DN g R /o ADD BY 913298.0 2081 622-88P2 Fax �-810 DEALER 0Nf%4iA °� PRELIMINARY GRADING&UTILITY PLAN 1 OF 1 NO. DATE BY CHD. APPR. REVISION ,,. • 7:1.3.7 ' uo \ \ \ \ ;. \ '',iM V-- II \isil.!-r .--- - 5 \. V RA R _. 70 I Of l' i \ ; M off` (n OA 19 Ec{ B d . - Z6= e O. A $ p ( \ WARREN G 36 q PA 1,. o• ^/ ' 9y CHRIS TORHERSON * ••D� 40. t‘s " , 17 I©'. At/ 0di , � CHIC' MI LW AUK - _--- ,I "3i V sx 3��5 ;Q // -4F' Q/ 4 -Tr, on 49 '-Y' cl' • 5 IQ 529 $, �P/' 1"L 53 lM1% ay111I,s pOAL 7166 \ �f-II 9` �`1 i'sF 1 • ''.� / y"t/. c6 . rpn r2A 4 4 • ! �' = •- S I iE ,�T b €� <516cT 1 - \ -\ 35 el__. _ 7 _ IE+ AU16 E sr PAUI.g 4.. ,,(AA STRAT$\\LA 11ES s i '.J In')0k\ Ca•• L 4 A l LJ� 0-EH a: krg GC). E fl 4 B (I) 1 _ c V/ IC GO o LEAFS _ \ .�E,Az.' 2 ^` �J o HSE. 57R4T0 ® ��.FIM - D/ 1 � Rl �' LANES.\ <,r9*\ v""�'�� 60] i)e G aLNG \ si\ r,ee.ram/ _ --_- --- S:5 415.75 \ �.r 11 i •6° , / 5�D ` ''- 3r062' •n�, TLileac i'/i"\of '' 6YF! _ � !��7—„, TiM 3.5, - - SP.57-81• sv®w0 \ TL.L23 . 1 D sel• 6 Q Z.."H4 0.dA:. ' RENTOf SHOPE 1 - eA m C \ ,' m ►r.�es .(47�'6 - 1 eu :I j6rL 1 MAIL ,, KELLER B � z:. rL a V ,1 F YL— R�CTresr �596 ° (z) CURRAN I,i# HAR2Y L.\AN EFSON 621 8 f 28 �i,ED ROBERT L EDWARDS - w, • �- �R IS"i T�s�-- H4 O �.J, L EDWA R DS 1 - A, Ac - 6L7 o I-..sl k1.) .0 lm®P B Ur)L 18 T..153 4.71 Ae- : 1 F.µl �• e° I 'I ss Ae zycr` 10 i -6 W L O I ✓ 33460 I . T[.133 60 11 i lisp �k . --.—.—. .--v.,.—.trc-.g_y1,.S.W.-17TH— —ST-- — — —.�`r._..— ILO .�. Y4n 98 0.^il I .+n °y4 l �S�aPVa� 1 I I ❑ III J9R-II'8 � pIG C STDflES—IryL, a° IVi �•e = oi W 0 W C- a -nu- r `I I > fir•„" sii 4 I�H s y�� Q LI �4 I , I r___ — __ _-1l .� l•r[//" , \ r�CC I435 Ac , 2 2¢ r 2 h ss . I 8 5.-2 L = 163 Ac."/ I . w W- 5 Q � F.N` r 37 z wm I m l I , 1 TL.j2 r.3 G STI 1 p -I -ls3 pRTHER 14 R�TNpSON N q6 ii p LL]6 GR I M1 0 h,A - 445, RIGHZ GF W F ` I _ -J 130 71 1) - _:—i 104:1"/ • i I I B M1 M1•I 1 11 !N I' 7 9✓ I I iz ittp pl o fe 1 4134 1 1 - •9 - A IS-53 1 ..\•. C 1 - 1 �1.,ry ;�i i 1 L,pAi I :, 0ar14.3r 6 , II 1 V 9.6,1 b 4 N INN • d 6eii �i a,�i 1 If �. II 2'11'1�D •-1 y.• '� r v4c4 re �m 1 N vac D I I • ��011CH 61.5 <� 'ylm5;¢P,k,. : I �• E-17--I--I" I„ '�. gel 1�'r-�T`-_r�- --+---- CITY OF RI1OI'I DEVELOPMENT SERVICESDIVISIONMENEMENigniMagninin 1 OWNERS within Ah•WOOjgct....„ site PROJECT NAME: RENTON LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER APPLICATION NO: The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 137.!th THOMAS WOLTER 8820 S 134th St #A 182305-9022-03 RENTON, WA 98055 FRED KNACK • 750 RAINIER AVE. S. - 192305-9063-02 RENTON, WA 98055 SFP—A LIMITED BOX 667 192305-9044-06 -. PARTNERSHIP PRINEVILTR, OR 97754 P.O. BOX 6006 192305-9031-01 DEARBORN, MI 48121 I - • •4 f,JAC*•:(7-1URRAN 10700 MERIDIAN AVE. N. 182395-9123-01 #505 SEATTLE, WA 98133 VICTOR DIAMBRI 1615 SHATrUCK AVE. S. 192305-9053-04 RENTON, WA 98055 CURRAN FAMILY LIMITED 10700 MERDIAN AVE. N. #505 182305-9211-04 PA SEATTLE, WA 98133 GLADYS PiEROTTI 17034 SE 184th ST 192305-9035-07 RENTON, WA 98058 (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER I • li Applicant Certification I, {} L J . C- ✓E , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: City of Renton Technical Services Records ill Title Company Records 0'' King Co ty Assessors Records Signed • Date Cn(2j/RCp (Applicant) NOTARY ATTESTED: Subs ibed and sworn before me, a Nota{y Public, in a d for the State of Washington, residing at on the Oi day of , 19'b . Sign /�IGC • (Notary Public) • RippligNA1110plpiiiMOR.TORipitilpp.F.6e:citWdt Renton>::Use:<<:>::>::>:::>k:>:::>k««:>:<:::»::»::>:;:>R::>:n;::R<>«;:::>::»:i:mi»»:>::>::«::<:>:s<::>:<in r� rl :::: :<:::>::>::>:>::: .Ir r n::::uve.e..ma ed : :<:»>: cat o . ioi ice .o .. e .� ................................................�Q.............. :»::>::::>::>::>::>:::>:_pity:)^tnh...1�.:..)........:.:...........................................................:.:::;.;:.:.::._:::::::::::.:...:.........................:....:.................................................:..::....:::. TARP tWash n ............................................. . : fore•°:iri�'�:>a:::N:O:ta :�:;Pu6...c:.:......................t..e....t.t....o.....................gtQ::::;;;::::::::A'T�;ES...:.::..��Ubs..........c�...............:...::::fit.:b� ::::::::::::::..{:::::::::.:.......rY................�...................:::::::::::::::::.:::::.::::::: ::::::::::::.::::...::..:............... ................ listprop.doc REV 07/95 2 % ,, ayp „ I-`-- C IT OF RENTON _ Yaft,' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 20, 1996 Mr. Paul Casey,A.I.A. The Casey Group Architects 10116-36th Avenue Court SW Suite#109 . • • Tacoma, WA 98499 SUBJECT: Les Schwab Addition/Remodel Project No. LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF Dear Mr. Casey: This letter is to inform you that the comment and/or appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated and the Administrative Site Plan Approval for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. Mitigation Measures and Conditions must be complied with prior to issuance of any permits. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 277-6186. For the Environmental Review Committee, P-emmo nifer Henning Project Manager FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 I Thic none.nnnl�inc Silo%rnn..nlur!m�lnri�l 7So/nncl nnnc.imnr WWashington State Northwest Region AO Department of Transportation Sid Morrison Secretary of Transportation DEVELOPMENT PLANNING riTVOF RENTON AUG 1 41995 DATE: August 12,1996 RECEIVED TO: Jennnifer Toth Henning City of Renton, Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 900 MP 7.72 CS 1796 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-Les Schwab Addition/Remodel File No. LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF Lkdit/42r1 FROM: Robert A. Josephson,PE,') of Planning&Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project which is located at 710 Rainier Avenue South. Our response is checked below: X We have reviewed this subject document and have no comments. The Project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. The State recommends that a traffic study be prepared to anaylyse the state intersections that are impacted by ten or more of the project's generated peak hour trips and also determine what mitigation measures, if any would be required. If you have any questions,please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee . File Name I , . • :::::::: ::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::.:;::;:.::::::.::.:::.....:.::::::::::::...:..:....:::::::::::::::. ..:................................... . a ..........................................:...:............:..:..:......::..::::: ......................................................................::. ............ tiFFI0.ANAI`.>0...:.5.OI.... ...... .ICY:MAILING......isli::.:.......::.:::.::,:.:.:::.........::::::::.::::...........:.::.:::::.. • On the St6 day of AUqt�S�. , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Report av,d L7ec.Minn • documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing • • paw, _ C• • as SAP • • (Signature of Sender) Sayvi& STATE OF WASHINGTON • ) • ) SS • COUNTY OF KING ) • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sig 1/DR e SL��i-(:%ie_ signed this . • instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument: • Dated: �1q6 � ,� �� ;, Notary lic in an f r the State of Washii$ or r•• " - Notary rint) i/b/4 /1- r �/ .-�c� � , My appointment expires: GI ' • r a • .i 4,,5` IC • Project Name: Le_m . SewWab ariley% eciet N Project Number. • •% -018,SA,V e..G NOTARY.DOC r � BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING July 24, 1996 MINUTES The minutes, as follows, are not verbatim transcript but a genera!summary of the issues discussed. The official record is recorded on tape. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT James Jacques, Bill Anderson, Ellery Brown, Dennis Dochnahl, Rosemary Quesenberry, Lee Connel and Teri Briere. CITY STAFF PRESENT Mark Pywell, Senior Planner;Jennifer Toth Henning„ Senior Planner;and Karen Codiga,Recording Secretary. 1. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Board of Adjustment was called to order by Chairperson Brown at 7:30 PM. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chairperson Brown led the Board and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. 3. ROLL CALL Chairperson Brown announced the meeting was called to order. A roll call resulted in the following members being present: James Jacques, Ellery Brown, Bill Anderson, Rosemary. Quesenberry, Dennis Dochnahl, Lee Connel and Teri Briere. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED: Les Schwab Addition/Remodel; LUA-96-078,SA,ECF,V The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 square foot single story building and add a 3,600 square foot service bay. An existing 900 square foot service bay would be demolished and the resulting size of the proposed building area would be 8,400 square feet. Three new parking stalls would be added for a total of 20 parking spaces. The applicant is seeking a Variance from the setback requirements of the Arterial Commercial (CA) Zone. The CA Zone requires that a minimum 10-foot landscaped strip along the street frontage be provided. No landscaped strip is proposed, instead,the applicant proposed that landscaping be installed in two areas on the site, one area would surround the pole sign on Rainier Avenue South, and the other landscaped area would be located at the southwest corner of the site within the parking lot. The proposal also requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. Jennifer Toth Henning, Senior Planner,presented the staff report and exhibits. BOA2.DOC\ Exhibit 1: Ye'� Project File Exhibit 2: Site Plan Map Criteria No. 1, That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The applicant believes that the property owner would suffer undue hardship if the variance is denied because the front on-site inter-connecting driveway will be lost. This driveway connection is required for the owner to enjoy a substantial property right possessed by a majority of area landowners (i.e., the provision of reasonable on-site circulation space to accommodate the existing use of the site). In addition, the small size and triangular shape of the property, combined with access from only one side of property limits building expansion design options for the property owner. Strict application of the Zoning Code Standards, which require the front landscaping would deprive the land owner from continuing use of the property to the same level, because the on-site circulation would be severely limited. This potential lack of circulation restricts the current level of commerce enjoyed by the property owner and other property owners in the vicinity. The existing narrow drive providing the on-site cross access was created by the previous widening of Rainier Avenue South. Criteria No. 2, That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The applicant believes that the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity as the site is currently developed and the proposed development would not worsen an existing situation. In fact, the owner proposes to improve the general appearance of the street frontage by adding landscaping in a planter around the existing pole sign to the north. Criteria No. 3, That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: The applicant believes that the granting of the variance will not constitute any special privilege for this landowner because the variance will only allow the continued use of the property to the same level as adjacent landowners. The small size and triangular shape of the property combined with existing site development and access from only one side (Rainier Avenue South). limit the options of the owner for expansion. The combination of these conditions does not appear to exist elsewhere in the immediate vicinity. Criteria No. 4, that the approval, as determined by the Board of Adjustment, be the minimal variance that would accomplish the desired purpose. The applicant believes that the requested variance is the minimum variance required to allow the property owner continued use of the property to current levels. Staff does not fully concur in that there is an opportunity to provide additional landscaping in the southwest corner, via the elimination of one compact parking stall adjacent to Rainier Avenue, and also to provide additional landscaping along Rainier Avenue South in the north corner of the site, by eliminating the north driveway, reconfiguring parking and incorporating a new area of landscaping. However, these measures are being discussed as part of the Site Plan Review process. This concluded the staff report. Chairperson Brown requested comments from the applicant. BOA2.DOC\ Mr. Russ Parker Les Schwab Company 710 Rainier Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Mr. Parker explained that his main concern is to get the maximum use out of the property. Mr. Parker explained the plans for remodel of the existing building and addition of a service bay. Chairperson Brown called for discussion and a decision from the Board. ACTION: BOARDMEMBER DOCHNAHL made a motion to grant the variance as requested. BOARDMEMBER ANDERSON seconded the motion. Chairperson Brown asked for a roll call. Board members voted to grant the variance (six"ayes"). The variance is granted. MOTION CARRIED. Chairperson Brown announced that the action of the Board of Adjustment shall be final and conclusive, unless within ten (10) days from the date of the action, the original applicant or an adverse party applies to the King County Superior Court for a Writ of Certiorari, a Writ of Prohibition or a Writ of Mandamus. Sprint Base Station/LUA-96-077,V,ACU,ECF The applicant seeks approval to construct a Personal Communication Services (PCS) facilities on the existing Highlands Water Tank. The antennas are approximately five feet four inches (64) tall and 2" by 6"in width/depth. The antennas will be attached to the top or, as an alternative, on the side of the water tank. The PCS facility will operate on a different wave band than TV or radios and should not interfere with the use of electrical equipment in the area. Mark Pywell, Senior Planner,presented the staff report and exhibits. Exhibit 1: Yellow Project File Exhibit 2: Site Plan Map Criteria No. 1, That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: In this case, the applicant contends, that the strict application of the Zoning Code would cause the applicant an undue hardship. If the towers were to be limited to 30 feet in height, the signal produced by the antennas would not be able to reach the users in this area as it would be blocked by the existing homes. To reduce the height of the antennas would require a significant number of the antennas to be located in line of sight of one another so that the signal would still be able to travel between the towers and so that the users of cellular phones can reach the towers Criteria No. 2, That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: BOA2.DOC\ The applicant cont that the granting of the variance will nr_,___ materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the area. The ground equipment will be screened from view. The antennas operate on a different wave band than televisions, radios and other electrical equipment. Therefore, the use of the antenna will not cause a problem for residents using their televisions, radios, etc. The Airport Manager contends that any extension over the existing height of the water tower has the potential to interfere with the maneuvering of aircraft as they approach the Renton Municipal Airport. The applicant will need to obtain a permit from the FAA. If they FAA should require that warning lights or other safety devices be attached to the water tower, the applicant should be responsible for the purchase, installation, and maintenance of the safety equipment Criteria No. 3,That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: The approval of this variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege in that other sites around the City have been granted variances. Cellular technology is based upon line-of-sight' technologies. Therefore, the towers must be located in a manner so that the signal can pass over the homes and trees in the adjacent area Criteria No. 4, that the approval, as determined by the Board of Adjustment, be the minimal variance that would accomplish the desired purpose. The applicant contends that they have requested the minimum variance necessary in order to be able to construct the facility that is required in this location. Staff notes that the GPS antenna is does not rely upon line-of-sight technology but is a system that communicates with satellites that are overhead. The antenna unit itself is only approximately 4"tall. The applicant's plans demonstrate that this unit will extend the height of the tower by approximately four and a half feet. It would appear that this antenna could be lowered which would reduce the concern of the Airport Manager. Staff has discussed this issue with the applicant. The applicant has agreed to relocate the GPS antenna so that it does not exceed the existing height of the tower This concluded the staff report. • Chairperson Brown requested comments from the applicant. Applicant was not present. Chairperson Brown requested comments from parties opposed to the project. Mr. Jon Nelson 3515 NE 12th Street Renton,WA 98056 - Mr. Nelson stated his concern that the proposed antenna will cause interference with his television. Mr. Nelson stated that if there is a problem with interference of reception in the area as a result of this antenna, as there has been in the past, he would like to be compensated for it. Mr. Nelson requested that Sprint Spectrum be responsible for connecting him to cable if interference is a problem. Mark Pywell, Senior Planner, explained that should neighbors experience interference with reception,the FCC would have to handle complaints and take corrective measures. Mr. Eugene Methven 1716 Monroe Avenue NE Renton,WA 98056 BOA2.DOC\ Mr. Methven stated he has been a neighbor in this area for iy years. Mr. Methven is also concerned that the proposed antenna will cause frequency problems for him and his neighbors. He explained that he already hears three other parties on his telephone due to frequency problems. Chairperson Brown called for discussion and a decision from the Board. ACTION: BOARDMEMBER BRIERE made a motion to grant the variance as requested. BOARDMEMBER ANDERSON seconded the motion. • Chairperson Brown asked for a roll call. Board members voted to grant the variance (six"ayes"). The variance is granted. MOTION CARRIED. Chairperson Brown announced that the action of the Board of Adjustment shall be final and conclusive, unless within ten (10) days from the date of the action, the original applicant or an adverse party applies to the King County Superior Court for a Writ of Certiorari, a Writ of Prohibition or a Writ of Mandamus. RCH TECHNICAL INSTITUTE SIGN VARIANCE/LUA-96-079,V The applicant seeks a variance from the Sign Ordinance in order to be able to locate a pole sign adjacent to the front property line. Pole signs are considered to be a structure and the placement of these signs are regulated by the front setback requirements of the IM zone Mark Pywell, Senior Planner,presented the staff report and exhibits. Exhibit 1: Yellow Project File Exhibit 2: Site Plan Map Criteria No. 1, That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: Although the applicant has a fairly standard sized industrial lot, the location of the sign is limited due to the existing layout of the facility, the existing parking lot configuration, and the existing street trees. The pole sign proposed by the applicant is considered to be a structure, as it is over six feet in height, and therefore, is subject to the front yard setback requirements of the zone. A monument sign could be located within the setback area but the applicant feels that a monument sign would not be visible in this area. The IM zone requires a minimum of a fifteen foot setback from all property lines abutting a street and a twenty foot setback if it is an arterial street. In this case the applicant would normally be required to maintain a fifteen foot setback from the front property line. The intent of this regulation is to ensure that structures located on the property do not intrude into or interfere with the publics use of the road. At this location there is a nine foot landscaped area and a six foot wide sidewalk between the edge of the property and the edge of the paved roadway. This, combined with the 1.5 foot setback provided by the applicant, will give the appearance of the required setback. The applicant contends that the physical features of the site require the sign to be located in the area that they have requested and that the landscaped area in the road right-of-way will prevent the sign from interfering with the public use of the roadway. Criteria No. 2, That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property,is situated: BOA2.DOC\ • As noted above, the applicant contends that proposed location of the sign will not interfere with the public use of the road or sidewalk area. The applicant also contends that the sign will not infringe on the use of the adjacent parcels. Criteria No. 3, That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: The applicant contends that the granting of this variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege as it is similar to the variance granted to the Maple Wood Golf Course for the location of the sign at the golf course entrance. Criteria No. 4, that the approval, as determined by the Board-of Adjustment, be the minimal variance that would accomplish the desired purpose. The applicant contends that the variance requested is the minimal variance necessary for the sign to be seen due to the location of the existing facilities on-site and the streets trees along 7th Street. This concluded the staff report Chairperson Brown requested comments from the applicant. Mr. Pat Kemp President RCH Technical Institute 500 SW 7th Renton,WA 98055 Mr. Kemp stated that RCH Institute is a school for the handicapped and that he proposes to locate a pole sign adjacent to the front property line. . Mr. Kemp stated that a pole sign is important for visibility in this area for his handicapped pupils to be able to see the sign from the street. BOARDMEMBER Briere stated that it was her concern that the proposed pole sign would be above the tree level and not be visible until people were right on it. She stated that it was her opinion that a monument sign would be more visible. Mr. Bruce Bryant Heath Signs 1762 Airport Way South Seattle,WA 98134 - - Mr. Bryant advised that a pole sign was most advisable for this location for visibility purposes. He stated he feels a monument sign would be obscured by existing bushes. Chairperson Brown called for discussion and a decision from the Board. ACTION: BOARDMEMBER ANDERSON made a motion to grant the variance as requested. - - - BOARDMEMBER JACQUES seconded the motion. Chairperson Brown asked for a roll call. Board members voted to grant the variance (four"ayes";three nays). (Nays: Boardmembers Briere, Quesenberry, Brown.) The variance is granted. MOTION CARRIED. BOA2.DOC\ } • Chairperson Brown jounced that the action of the Board I, djustment shall be final and conclusive, unless within ten (10) days from the date of the action, the original applicant or an adverse party applies to the King County Superior Court for a Writ of Certiorari, a Writ of Prohibition or a Writ of Mandamus. 6. OLD BUSINESS BOARDMEMBER Brown addressed the previous meeting of July 17, 1996 and McDonald's request for a sign variance. Boardmember Brown advised that he contacted Mr. Jim Hanson regarding the covenant levied on Renton Village Associates in 1994 which was not recorded. Mr. Hanson advised that the Sign Code has been revised and that the Renton Village sign today does meet code requirements and therefore the recording of a covenant at this time would not apply. 7. NEW BUSINESS Boardmembers discussed having a meeting with City staff to reiterate the duties and responsibilities of the Board of Adjustment in making variance decisions. Karen Codiga will discuss this issue with City staff and report back regarding setting up a meeting in the near future. 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS None. 9. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, BOARDMEMBER DOCHNAHL moved that the meeting be adjourned. BOARDMEMBER QUESENBERRY seconded the motion. Chairperson Brown adjourned the Board of Adjustment meeting following a unanimous vote. 4/4" �i�pers 'Br' y-, DATE (Meeting ate: July 24; 1996) BOA2.DOC\ , • ; -:•:::::`:`. : ::: ::�:•.:* • •• ::```;:::::..::: :::?JUS,TMEN .:::•: OAR :QF A . ;:::::<:: ::::• .: : °°; . " : : :': .•: : ::: <: . ;:::: : PORT. : ::: : '-:. .:.: :: •• : : STAFF:RE ::: : >:::: :•. •: .::'::: •: : :•:.::• . • • A;•• SUMMARY:>IN.FORM ►T�41�° ° ::< ;:'<'::::::;:..` ':: ::':°::;y '_ `::.:: : :;.:.:.::: : ::. ::.:.:• :::::::::• >::'`:-:>.:-•: >:: .. ':' . ,;: ::°..;..:..::APPLICANT:•• .::.::::>: :<:: :::.`:::::.•:>.:.:;:: .:: :::::...:ul:Case i .Iie::.Case ( rou•:.ArthdectS .: :..;:-::::.. ::•..• :::...: ::::.:«..:...:: ::::PROJECT:'::::::::r:;;• •::>` ::.> r•::-:``..•:>. ;•••.::.:»:°t_ES•.•SCHWAB>ADDITION/REMODEL••:: ..:...::::::::.,::: ::: °::.'::.:�<- ' :.:>:<:>`.:>` :'•::.:•.::: ::::. APP 1CATION O••::::::::::>::::;:.:>..,,„•,::::'°: •WA-96-07$,S • ::;i°•.::: . ;:;:`>::: ':`>;":':`.'::` .::,..: ::.:>:: :`: :::•'::• < ':: :..::: i. :•::; ` ;.::SUMMARYOF.REQUEST:::;::.::.::. :..:.:>.+ ::.Ttie.'.applicant•.;•proposes::.to remodel an :.existing :5;70Q';square:roof: •: •............................................. •.: . . . :..: ... • ;. single:sfory buitding:::anii:ad•d:a::; ;600;:'square..foot•:se.rvice bay •:.••.n.' . ;: ''::':•: :: ': : ;: ::: `:`:::;'`:; ::: existin ••900:: uare..foot•:serv• ice:°bay::would:>be.::demolished and•:the: :..::::':::.::.::.;•;.:.:..:.>::.::::.; ::.:.?-::•••:•:°•°•:>: :::•::;::;::: ", ::>;•":.,..•••.:> :. esultin •:•size.of:.the:;..ro...osed>buildin area.;would:be•8` 00 uare e .: a i I uld :be` a•dded or a tot. :::: :•-feet:" •Three::'n •w. rk n .stal s vuo f t of 20.. :.: :?::..:• . -:::•::::•„::.::.•:•:::.:::;::::::.::.::>•;;.::: ::::... parking:.::s aces:.::.The:.:a licant:;.•Is.;.seeking•:aP•Variance:front::the,l :.,• .:••: :...:.. .... ...:::..•: .: .....: ....:.... .;. *§?:.::•:.::e:••. ..;::;setback•te uirements of the Arterial Commercial:' CA Zone:••:The:CA: :.: ::.::.:::::: :.::; :::: .:. ..:.. ::.:<::.::..:. .. .::::: �. .::::: ;.; : :°>:;;.<;:'Zone:requires:that :a:minimum:1.a-foot..landscaper:strip:.•along:`:the:', ..• :. ..:....::.•.:::::;:.•• •::::.;:::: :.>::....: :,;;::street•::frontage• .::be"••p.iitof o.s. .•Na:•;tan soaped 'si.id::.bo..proposed;:: . :.. .:. ,.: •. .. :. ::....:.......:::;..:.......:, ;;'..;:....:;:::": ....:„:•::::'• :, instead, the•;applicant:.proposed;:thiat.landscapingg::be:. nstalle„iontwo:;. • :;:. .::;.::;:'.:•:. • ..... ..: •:•. :.;::: :..::.. :•. . : : •areas.:o�:r `•the site :`one:.area.would'surround:the>p•.ole'si n on Rainier: :• . :: :::.. :•: 2.: . •..;.:..::::: :;::•:,:• :Avenue.:South :and:the oth:er:lan: soaped;:;area°;would°•.be:.located at ..•`::• :..:.•. : •• :the southwest:corrier'`of the•`site within•the:-. •.• n °lot:`:°The?:proposal: • • :,...:: :: : .... : .:. ;: ;,•also• : requires environmenfal'':revi.•• ••and•: ad:I- inistra.ive site• plan • ...;.. .•.. •... . :. ..... •:. •:..:..•: approval;:;..°:'::::.: .. • 'L.00ATION OF'I ROPOSA[,,:: >.:<:: €.I?:Rauuer:Avenuesouth r.:; :' ; :,: :.: ° : -: . �;. }•g•v R CUI111AN IU T L.• 41[giOM �1 s31•IIO•E[RI t [owARos + / Ai.n � �' ''1 �^ RI �r . i IL 4TI WA R Ac. �� e a Fg a _ s hu ■ • / `.1.7"� .SS A4 W.N • 7!Y • .l n. 1 .0 .��Pfllt b17i r IG C STORE . •1 T' �A r. y •• • 0 , 1 • Tw14 N �` 1 33 —_ 1 •sue r,n •i UQ`f1 `� W r VICtOR u_ UTAA�RRI O !k 43s 1Dryh' .� * 1,1•• r.w.,.• tK.0 I I I 1 S I< • ,..n n . „p-i--170 - x.0 NQRZNfRN Project Location Map BOARPT.DOC BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REP(` LES SCHV' -11DDITION/REMODEL LUA-96-078,V,ECF,SA ' July 24,1996 - • -Page2of3� 9. Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Approval. The Environmental Review Committee is scheduled to consider this.proposal at their regularly scheduled meeting on Tuesday, July 23, 1996. The Zoning Administrators will consider the Site Plan at the same time. No decisions or recommendations had been issued at the time of the preparation of this Staff Report. .Staff will update the Board at the public hearing regarding the recommendations of the ERC and Zoning Administrators. 2. Variances Requested: The CA Zone requires that lots abutting or fronting public streets have a minimum landscaping strip of 15 feet (Code Section 4-31-10.4.D.6.a.(1). The applicant is requesting a variance from this development standard in order to allow the expansion of the current building, while allowing the existing vehicular access and circulation to remain. Presently, there is no landscaping along the street frontage. The Les Schwab tire center has been in place for many years and has already lost space for parking in front of the store due to earlier widening of Rainier Avenue South. The remaining narrow space in front of the existing tire center is used as a drive aisle that connects the southern and northern existing parking areas and driveway access points onto Rainier Avenue. The applicant states in their request that the requirement for landscaping along the frontage would result in the loss of the existing driving aisle that connects the access points and the on site parking areas. This would result in additional traffic congestion on Rainier, as on-site circulation would then either need to enter and exit on Rainier, or, go through the rear gated storage areas in order to access different areas of the site. The proposed building expansion does not effect or limit the existing on-site vehicular circulation. The applicant is proposing that as a trade-off, the amount of required landscaping be consolidated into two areas on the site, one 574 square foot plating island surrounding the pole sign, and a second 1,909 square foot landscaped area in the southern corner of the site. "The Board of Adjustment shall have authority to grant a variance upon making a determination, in writing, that the conditions specified below have been found to exist:" • 1. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The applicant believes that the property owner would suffer undue hardship if the variance is denied because the front on-site inter-connecting driveway will be lost. This driveway connection is required for the owner to enjoy a substantial property right possessed by a majority of area landowners (i.e., the provision of reasonable on-site circulation space to accommodate the existing use of the site). In addition, the small size and triangular shape of the property, combined with access from only one side of property limits building expansion design options for the property owner. Strict application of the Zoning Code Standards, which require the front landscaping would deprive the land owner from continuing use of the property to the,same level, because the on-site circulation would be severely limited. ' • This potential lack of circulation restricts the current level of commerce enjoyed by the property owner and other property owners in the vicinity. The existing narrow drive providing the on-site cross access was created by the previous widening of Rainier Avenue South. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: BOARPT.DOC -BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPO LES SCHW ,DDITION/REMODEL LUA-96-078,V,ECF,SA 6 July 24,1996 Page 3 of 3 The applicant believes that the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity as the site is currently developed-and the proposed development would not worsen an existing situation. In fact, the owner proposes to improve the general appearance of the street frontage by adding landscaping in a planter around the existing pole sign to the north. 3. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: The applicant believes that the granting of the variance will not constitute any special privilege for this landowner because the variance will only allow the continued use of the property to the same level as adjacent landowners. The small size and triangular shape of the property combined with existing site development and access from only one side (Rainier Avenue South) limit the options of the owner for expansion. The combination of these conditions does not appear to exist elsewhere in the immediate vicinity. 4. That the approval as determined by the Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: The applicant believes that the requested variance is the minimum variance required to allow the property owner continued use of the property to current levels. Staff does not fully concur in that there is an opportunity to provide an area of additional landscaping (130 - 200 square feet) into the proposal in the southwest corner, via the elimination of one compact parking stall adjacent to Rainier Avenue. This would then be the minimum variance possible given the applicant's proposal to construct an addition and utilize existing site access and circulation. BOARPT.DOC 00et czo PUBLIC HEARING MEETING J U LY 24 , 1996 7 : 30 PM BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Minutes of July 17, 1996 will available for approval at the August meeting) 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED: * Les Schwab Addition/LUA-96-078,SA,ECF,V * Sprint Base Station Variance/LUA-96-077,ECF,ACU,V * RCH Technical Institute Variance/LUA-96-079,V 6. AUDIENCE COMMENT: *When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 8. NEW BUSINESS 9. ANNOUNCEMENTS 10. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF RENTON Report DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS & ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& Decision ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE July 23,1996 (Environmental) August 5, 1996 (Site Plan) ' Project Name Les Schwab Addition/Remodel Applicant Paul Casey (The Casey Group Architects) File Number LUA-096-078, SA, V, Project Manager Jennifer Toth Henning ECF Project Description The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 s.f. single story building and add a 3,600 s.f. service bay. The project requires Site Plan Approval and Environmental Review. A variance is also requested from the CA Zone requirement for a 10-foot landscaped strip along the street frontage. The applicant instead proposes to provide landscaping in two areas, one along Rainier Avenue surrounding the existing pole sign, and a second at the SW corner of the parking lot. Project Location 710 Rainier Avenue South Exist. Bldg. Area sf, 5,700 square feet Proposed New Bldg. Area 3,600 square feet sf Site Area 32,884 square feet Total Building Area sf 8,400 square feet ram.-.-a.l _,-•-. 4:2-r H.S•pr_{,m-'-s-- -.. •1--tom... -I--- r.7•-p ... ;"wd • 1, _... — _ uua.- ra.nr nr •! R � ,,,,ion 'r r ,a, • • 4.--- \\ 1 DID 13R1 r o -. a dfe 0. .4r .. ris . T .ig 1 , • ,.. cc • •• , 1.... li G A .. F.N.. • a. z.. r 0 to. ni 146 �— i C .o.0 NpPtNE°14 • . I . w. 00 SON , ..... ,....-F r.1 .t i•I i► —. ! oRMfT 11 10‘. e] may. j _ City of Renton PB/PW--Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action 2 Les Scwab Addition/Remodel--LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF August 5, 1996 Part One: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant, Paul Casey, proposes to remodel an existing Les Schwab tire store located on Rainier Avenue South. The existing single story store is 5,700 square feet and the addition would consist of 3,600 square feet. A 900 square foot service bay on the southwest end of the existing building would be demolished and the addition would be constructed in place of the service bay. The resulting size of the proposed building area would be 8,400 square feet. Seventeen parking spaces currently exist on the site and five new parking stalls are proposed for a total of 22 spaces. One of the spaces would be handicapped accessible, three would be compact (8.5' X 16') and the remaining 18 would be standard spaces (9' X 20'). . There is presently no landscaping on the site. As part of the proposal, the applicant would create two landscaped areas, a 574 square foot landscaped bed along Rainier Avenue South, surrounding the existing pole sign, and a second 1,843 square foot area at the extreme southeast corner of the triangular shaped parcel. Part Two: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1) Transportation Impacts: The project site is an existing commercial use located on the east side of Rainier Avenue South near NE 7th Street. The expansion and remodel of the existing use would generate additional traffic trips thus impacting City streets. A Traffic Mitigation Fee would apply to the proposal as mitigation for the impacts resulting from increased traffic. A fee of $75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project would apply. The number of trips is estimated to be 98, therefore, the estimated mitigation fee is $7,350. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee is based on a rate of $75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. This fee is due prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Traffic Mitigation Fee: Resolution 3100, Ordinance 4527, SEPA 2) Fire Prevention Impacts: The proposal would result in the expansion of an existing use and would increase the burden on the City's Fire Department for fire protection and emergency response service. In order to off-set the increased demand, the Fire Mitigation Fee will apply at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new development. Credit is given for the area of demolished buildings. Since the addition would be 3,600 s.f. and the demolished area would be 900 square feet, the Fire Mitigation Fee would apply to the new net area only or 2,700 square feet. The estimated Fire Mitigation Fee would be $1,404 (2,700 s.f. X$0.52/s.f.). SRERC2.DOC/ City of Renton P/B/PW--Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action 3 Les Scwab Addition/Remodel--LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF August 5, 1996 Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee of $0.52 per square foot of new building (less demolished area). The Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated to be $1,404 based on 2,700 square feet X $0.52/square foot. The fee is due prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus Fire Mitigation Fee, SEPA. B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF X DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall be required to pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee is based on a rate of$75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. This fee is due prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee of$0.52 per square foot of new building (less demolished area). The Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated to be $1,404 based on 2,700 square feet X $0.52/square foot. The fee is due prior to the issuance of building permits. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only,they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 2. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City, state, county, federal and other jurisdictional regulations, codes and policies governing the project and site. 3. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate submittals prepared 'by a registered Civil Engineer, according to City of Renton drafting standards. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000, 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000; and 3% of anything over $200,000. One-half of the fee must be paid upon application for SRERC2.DOC/ City of Renton PB/PW--Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action • 4 Les Scwab Addition/Remodel--LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF August 5, 1996 building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. Fire Prevention 4. The preliminary fire flow required is 3,750 gpm. Four fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed structure and three fire hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. It appears that existing hydrants meet this requirement. 5. Buildings shall comply with Article 81 of the Uniform Fire Code for high-piled combustible storage (tire storage area). This shall include the addition of smoke vents and afire alarm system in the tire storage area. Police -- Crime Prevention 6. An additional 1.86 police calls for service are estimated annually. The applicant is advised to contact Renton Police Crime Prevention at 235-2571 for advice in securing construction sites against theft and vandalism. Part Three: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION Report& Decision A. Type of Land Use Action x Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use. Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade &Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. A-1, Site Plan (Received June 24, 1996). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. A-2, Floor Plan (Received June 24, 1996). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. A-3, Service Bay Cross Section (Received June 24, 1996). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. C-1, Site Civil (Received June 24, 1996). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. L-1,-Site Landscape Plan (Received June 24, 1996) C. Consistency with Site Plan Review Criteria: In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31-33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following Issues have been identified by City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers: Section 4-31-33 (D.) Site Plan Review Criteria SRERC2.DOC/ City of Renton P/B/PW--Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action 5 Les Scwab Addition/Remodel --LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF August 5, 1996 1. General Criteria: a. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; The proposal to expand the Les Schwab tire center conforms to the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Commercial. Policy LU-170 calls for the provision of landscaping and streetscaping to soften visual impacts. While a landscaped strip along the streets is not proposed, the applicant is improving upon the existing site 'conditions by adding two landscaped areas, one of which would be located along Rainier Avenue South. Policy LU-174 encourages landscaping in parking areas, especially along roadways, to reduce visual impacts. The Les Schwab proposal does not include a specific landscaped strip, but would add over 500 feet of landscaped area surrounding the existing pole sign along Rainier Avenue South. Policy LU-176 calls for redevelopment and intensification of uses in the EAC rather than expansion of the areas. Since this proposal would remodel and add to the existing business, it meets the intent of the policy. • b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The proposal generally conforms to the development standards of the CA Zone and meets minimum setback, height, lot coverage, and parking requirements. The proposal does not comply with the landscaping requirement calling for a minimum 10-foot landscaped strip along the street frontage. However, the applicant is requesting relief through a variance application regarding this development standard. The City's Board of Adjustment will consider the variance request at their regular meeting of July 24, 1996. The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires 20 parking stalls, and 22 are proposed. Since the parking area is 22,867 square feet in size, the landscaping provisions of the Parking and Loading Ordinance (Code Section 4-14) apply. For parking lots 10,000 square feet or greater in size, the applicant is required to landscape a minimum of 5% of the interior of the parking lot in a pattern that reduces the barren appearance of the parking lot. While the applicant is providing approximately 10.8% of the area of the parking lot as landscaping, the majority of the new landscaping (1,909 sf) would be located at the extreme southeast corner in a secured employee area and would not be visible from the public street. While this proposed landscaping would help to soften the appearance of the building environment,'it would not respond to the intent of the development standard to provide landscaping between the street and the building or within the parking lot. j An area exists in the north corner of the parcel that could.be used to accommodate additional landscaping. Presently, a driveway and angled parking occur in this area. However, the driveway is one of three serving the rather small site, and all enter and exit from Rainier Avenue South; and, the existing parking on the east property line could be reconfigured to mirror the parking on the north side of the building. This would yield additional area along the Rainier Avenue South street frontage that could be used for landscaping. As mentioned, three driveways serve the site providing ingress and egress from Rainier Avenue South. The Parking and Loading Ordinance (Section 4-14-4) states SRERC2.DOC/ City of Renton PB/PW--Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action 6 Les Scwab Addition/Remodel--LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF August 5, 1996 that there shall not be more than two driveways for each 330 feet of street frontage for a single ownership. Since the property has three driveway approaches in approximately 250 lineal feet, one driveway should be eliminated in order to conform with the Parking Code. Staff will recommend as a condition of Site Plan Approval, that the northernmost driveway be removed and that the parking lot be reconfigured to provide for additional landscaping along Rainier Avenue South both in the north and south corners of the site. c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The expansion and remodel of the existing business will not result in additional impacts to surrounding properties and uses from the existing condition. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The proposed addition will decrease the area available on the south portion of the site for vehicles to maneuver. The applicant is proposing an aisle that is 16'-6" in width. The aisle and parking area at the rear of the store behind the service bay and through a secured gated area, and would be used by employees only, so this is not considered to be of major consequence. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The expansion/remodel project would upgrade the appearance of the commercial facility and would result in the installation of additional landscaping, increasing the value of the site and conserving surrounding property values. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; Circulation on the site is presently awkward due to the irregular shape of the subject parcel, the effects of widening of Rainier Avenue South over time, and the three existing curb cuts. Given these constraints, customer, vendor and employee traffic appears to utilize the site in a manner that avoids conflict. The rear portion of the site is secured and would be used by employees, customers would continue to use the north parking area, and a handicapped access space would be provided adjacent to the existing walkway. If the staff recommendation to decrease the number of existing driveways to two is adopted, then the efficiency of vehicles moving on the site would be increased. Staff will also recommend that a pedestrian circulation plan be prepared by the applicant and submitted to the Development Services Division for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The pedestrian circulation plan should indicate pedestrian walkways through the use of striping or variations in paving. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposal would not result in adverse impacts to light or air on the site or on surrounding parcels. SRERC2.DOC/ City of Renton P/B/PW--Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action 7 Les Scwab Addition/Remodel--LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF August 5, 1996 h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; Not applicable. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Adequate public services and facilities are available to serve the store expansion. j. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The proposal would improve the appearance of the site through the addition of new construction, remodeling of the building and the installation of new landscaping on the site. The improvements would be greatest if additional landscaping is provided along Rainier Avenue South, on the north corner of the site. 2. Mitigation of Impacts to Surrounding Properties and Uses: a. Mitigation of undesirable impacts of proposed structures and site layouts that could impair the use or enjoyment or potential use of surrounding uses and structures and of the community; The proposed location of the building addition would be in the same area as the portion of the existing building that would be demolished. No undesirable impacts would be expected to result from the proposal. b. Mitigation of undesirable impacts when an overscale structure, in terms of size, bulk, height, and intensity, or site layout is permitted that violates the spirit and/or intent of the zoning code and impairs the use, enjoyment or potential use of surrounding properties; Not applicable. c. Provision of a desirable transition and linkage between uses and to the street, utility, walkway, and trail systems in the surrounding area by the arrangement of landscaping, fencing and/or other buffering techniques, in order to prevent conflicts and to promote coordinated and planned benefit from, and access to, such elements; The applicant is proposing landscaping that defines the one existing vehicular entrance from Rainier and additional landscaping at the south corner of the site that buffers this site from the adjacent uses. Staff will recommend that an additional landscaped area be added in place of one compact parking space, adjacent to Rainier Avenue South at the southwest corner of the site, and also that the parking lot be reconfigured and the third access drive be closed on the north corner of the property to provide for additional landscaped area along the street frontage. SRERC2.DOC/ City of Renton P/B/PW--Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action 8 Les Scwab Addition/Remodel--LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF August 5, 1996 d. Consideration of placement and scale of proposed structures in relation to the natural characteristics of a site in order to avoid over-concentration of structures on a particular portion of a site such that they create a perception of greater height or bulk than intended under the spirit of the zoning code; The proposed addition replaces a smaller service bay that would be demolished. e. Effective location, design and screening of parking and service areas in order to promote efficient function of such facilities, to provide integrated facilities between uses when beneficial, to promote "campus-like" or "park-like" layouts in appropriate zones, and to prevent unnecessary repetition and conflict between uses and service areas or facilities; The size and shape of the parcel dictate that parking occur in three separate areas. This effectively avoids a large expanse of parking. Employee parking and service areas would be located at the rear of the structure. f. Mitigation of the unnecessary and avoidable impacts of new construction on views from existing buildings and future developable sites, recognizing the public benefit and desirability of maintaining visual accessibility to attractive natural features and of promoting "campus-like" or "park-like" settings in appropriate zones; Not applicable. g. Provision of effective screening from public streets and residential uses for all permitted outdoor storage areas (except auto and truck sales), for surface mounted utility equipment, for rooftop equipment, and for all refuse and garbage containers, in order to promote a "campus-like" or "park-like" setting where appropriate and to preserve the effect and intent of screening or buffering otherwise required by the zoning code; Landscaping would be added along the public street in one 574 square foot area surrounding the existing pole sign. Staff will recommend that a small additional area of the landscaping be added adjacent to Rainier Avenue South and that a larger landscaped area be provided at the north corner of the site (by closing off of the ingress/egress driveway at the north end and reconfiguring the existing parking layout). Garbage containers would be located at the rear of the site, adjacent to a new 1,909 square foot landscaped area and near the employee parking. The garbage containers would be located away from public view. h. Consideration of placement and design of exterior lighting in order to avoid excessive brightness or glare to adjacent properties and streets. Site lighting would not change from the existing condition with the proposal. SRERC2.DOC/ City of Renton P/B/PW--Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action 9 Les Scwab Addition/Remodel --LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF August 5, 1996 3. Mitigation of Impacts of a Proposed Site Plan to the Site: a. Building placement and spacing to provide for privacy and noise reduction; orientation to views and vistas and to site amenities, to sunlight and prevailing winds, and to pedestrian and vehicle needs; The expansion would replace a smaller service bay area with a new larger 6 bay addition, located in the same area on the site. b. Consideration of placement and scale of proposed structures in relation to the openness and natural characteristics of a site in order to avoid over concentration or the impression of oversized structures; The structure would be appropriately sited to avoid placement or scale impacts. c. Preservation of the desirable natural landscape through retention of existing vegetation and limited soil removal, insofar as the natural characteristics will enhance the proposed development; Not applicable. d. Use of existing topography to reduce undue cutting, filling and retaining walls in order to prevent erosion and unnecessary storm water runoff, and to preserve stable natural slopes and desirable natural vegetation; Not applicable. e. Limitation of paved or impervious surfaces, where feasible, to reduce runoff and increase natural infiltration; The amount of impervious surface would be reduced slightly through the introduction of approximately 2,500 square feet of new landscaping. f. Design and protection of planting areas so that they are not susceptible to damage from vehicles or pedestrian movements; Landscaping areas would be located-behind curbing so that neither vehicles nor pedestrians would damage the plant materials or irrigation. g. Consideration of building form and placement and landscaping to enhance year-round conditions of .sun and shade both on-site and on adjacent properties and to promote energy conservation. Not'applicable. 4. Circulation and Access: a. Provision of adequate and safe vehicular access to and from all properties; As proposed, vehicles would continue to utilize the three existing access drives and the existing cross-traffic aisle would be maintained in the front of the store, keeping SRERC2.DOC/ City of Renton P/B/PW--Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action 10 Les Scwab Addition/Remodel--LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF August 5, 1996 cross-site traffic off of Rainier Avenue South. Staff is recommending that one of the three driveways be closed to coincide with the Parking and Loading Ordinance and to provide an additional area for landscaping. The employee and service drive-aisle located along the south side of the addition would be narrow (16'-6") and would not accommodate two-way traffic. Since this area would be secured by chainlink fences and gates, and used only by employees or service purveyors (such as Waste Management) it appears to be appropriate. b. Arrangement of the circulation pattern so that all ingress and egress movements may occur at as few points as possible along the public street, the points being capable of channelization for turning movements; Existing ingress/egress points would be maintained under this proposal. c. Consolidation of access points with adjacent properties, when feasible; Not applicable, however, staff will recommend that one of the three existing access points be eliminated. d. Coordination of access points on a superblock basis so that vehicle conflicts and vehicle/pedestrian conflicts are minimized; Not applicable. e. Orientation of access points to side streets or frontage streets rather than directly onto arterial streets, when feasible; Not possible, Rainier Avenue South is the only option for this proposal. f. Promotion of the safety and efficiency of the internal circulation system, including the location, design and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian access points, drives, parking, turnarounds, walkways, bikeways, and emergency access ways; The three existing driveways appear to be excessive given the 250 feet of frontage that the store has along Rainier Avenue South. Staff will recommend that the northernmost driveway be eliminated and that the parking be reconfigured to accommodate additional landscaping. Customer parking is located adjacent to the raised walkway, and across the aisle from the walkway. Employee and service parking would be located behind the building on the south side in a secured area. The site constrains parking and circulation, and potential conflict with vehicles could occur in the narrow driving aisle along the southwest side of the new addition. However, since this aisle would be in a secured area and used only by employees or service purveyors, it appears to be acceptable. It is not clear from the submittals as to how pedestrians would move around the site safely. Staff will recommend that the applicant provide a pedestrian circulation plan indicating pedestrian access striping or other forms of delineation on the site in order to address pedestrian safety. SRERC2.DOC/ City of Renton P/B/PW--Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action 11 Les Scwab Addition/Remodel--LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF August 5, 1996 g. Separation of loading and delivery areas from parking and pedestrian areas; The proposal appears to comply with this criteria. Loading and delivery areas would be confined to the rear corner (southeast corner of the site) and would be within a secured area accessible to employees of the facility. Access would be through parking and pedestrian areas, but would not appear to be of major consequence. h. Provisions for transit and carpool facilities and access where appropriate; and Not applicable. i. Provision for safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking areas, buildings, public sidewalks and adjacent properties. A recommendation will be made for the applicant to provide a pedestrian circulation plan to the Development Services Division which demonstrates how pedestrians access the showroom from the sidewalk and parking areas. If adequate pedestrian facilities do not exist, the applicant will be required to provide striped or otherwise delineated walkways for the use of customers. 5. Signage: a. Employment of signs primarily for the purpose of identification; An existing pole sign would continue to be utilized, no change in signage is envisioned. b. Management of sign elements, such as size, location and arrangement so that signs complement the visual'character of the surrounding area and appear in proportion to the building and site to which they pertain; Existing signs would continue to be utilized. c. Limitation of the number of signs to avoid visual clutter and distraction; No change in signage is proposed. d. Moderation of surface brightness or lighting intensity except for that necessary for sign visibility; and N/A e. Provision of an identification system to allow for quick location of buildings and addresses. (Ord. 3981, 4-7-86) Not applicable. SRERC2.DOC/ City of Renton P/B/PW--Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action 12 Les Scwab Addition/Remodel --LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF August 5, 1996 6. Aquifer Protection Area (APA): Prior to the issuance of any permit in an Aquifer Protection Area, a finding must be made that the proposal will not impact the quantity or quality of water in the aquifer on a short-term basis, long-term basis, or cumulatively in conjunction with other existing or proposed uses. a. The required finding shall be made by the Hearing Examiner for all proposals which are subject to approval by the Hearing Examiner pursuant to Section 4-8- 10. All other findings shall be made by the Water Utility Engineer. b. The required finding shall be based on the activities to be conducted, substances that will be stored, handled, transported, treated, used or produced, and the potential for these activities or substances to degrade the groundwater quality. Not applicable. 7. Hazardous Waste Treatment and Storage Facilities: a. Above-ground hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities shall be. constructed with containment controls which will prevent the escape of hazardous wastes in the event of an accidental release from the facility. Such controls shall conform with all adopted Federal, State and local design and construction standards. N/A b. Underground hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities shall comply with Chapter 2 of Title VII, the Underground Storage Tank Ordinance. N/A c. Hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities shall comply with Article 80 of the Uniform Fire Code as adopted by ordinance by the City of Renton. N/A d. A hazardous waste spill contingency plan for immediate implementation in the event of a release of hazardous wastes at the facility shall be reviewed and approved by the Renton Fire Department prior to issuance of any permits. N/A e. The location of all on-site and off-site facilities must comply with the state siting criteria as adopted in accordance with RCW 70.105.210. (Ord. 4186, 11-14-88) The expansion would comply in the same way that the existing business complies. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. SRERC2.DOC/ City of Renton P/B/PW--Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action 13 Les Scwab Addition/Remodel --LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF August 5, 1996 Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now makes and enters the following: D. Findings 1) Request: The Applicant, Paul Casey, has requested Environmental Review & Site Plan Approval for the construction of an addition and the remodeling of the existing Les Schwab tire store. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: ' The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 5. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Commercial. 5) Zoning: The site plan as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Arterial Commercial (CA) zoning designation. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site ,include: North: Commercial (fast food, auto oriented commercial) East: Auto dealer (Lincoln Mercury); South: Auto dealers (Subaru and Sound Ford); and West: Rainier Avenue South and Commercial (Boston Market, Lazy Bee) ' E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) Specific Land Use (e.g. Site Plan Approval) issues were raised by various City departments as follows: a). The proposed drive aisle on the southeast side of the new structure is too narrow to accommodate two-way traffic. However, it since it would not be used by customers and would be in a secured area, it appears to be acceptable. b) The proposal requires only 20 parking spaces and 22 spaces are proposed. One compact parking space on the southwest corner of the site adjacent to SRERC2.DOC/ City of Renton P/B/PW--Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action 14 Les Scwab Addition/Remodel--LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF August 5, 1996 Rainier Avenue South could be eliminated and an additional landscaped area could be provided in its place. c) Additional landscaping could be provided in the north corner of the site by eliminating the northernmost driveway, and reconfiguring parking. d) Pedestrian access is not clearly demonstrated from parking areas to the customer service and showroom areas. 3) The proposal generally complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of EAC; and the Zoning designation of CA provided that the requested landscaping variance is approved, and that additional landscaped areas are installed. . F. Decision The Site Plan for Les Schwab Addition/Remodel File No. LUA-96-078, SA, V, ECF is approved, subject to following conditions: CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall remove one compact parking space on the southwest corner of the subject site and replace it with additional site landscaping to match the landscaping proposed around the pole sign. The revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall remove the northernmost driveway along Rainier Avenue South and reconfigure the existing parking to provide an approximate 15-foot to 20-foot wide landscaped area which extends from the existing pole sign to the northeast corner of the site. The proposed landscaped area located at the southeast corner of the site will not be required as long as the new landscaped area adjacent to Rainier Avenue South, together with additional site landscaping meets the minimum landscaping requirements. Revisions to the Landscape Plan shall be submitted to the Development Services Division for review and must be approved before the issuance of any building permits. 3. A pedestrian circulation plan shall be provided to the Development Services Division for review and approval. The plan shall demonstrate the existing or proposed pedestrian circulation elements that allow for safe access between the sidewalk and buildings, and between parking areas and buildings. This shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of building permits. SRERC2.DOC/ • City of Renton P/B/PW--Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action 15 Les Scwab Addition/Remodel --LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF August 5, 1996 DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION August 5, 1996 SIGNATURES 11111Le 6 76 Ja es C Chanson, Zoning Administrator _ date Michael D. attermann, oning Administrator date TRANSMITTED this 5th day of August, 1996 to the applicant and owner: Paul Casey 10116 36th Avenue Court SW Tacoma, WA 98499 SFP (a limited partnership) 646 North Madras Hwy. Prineville OR 97754 TRANSMITTED this 5th day of August, 1996 to the parties of record: none TRANSMITTED this 5th day of August, 1996 to the following: Bob Arthur,Land Use Inspector Jim Chandler,Building Official Art Larson, Fire Marshal Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney Valley Daily News Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration The decision on the requested administrative land use action is being made separately from the Environmental Determination. The administrative land use and environmental decisions will become final if the decision/decisions is not appealed within 14 days of the respective dates of publication. An appeal of either or both decisions must be filed within the 14 day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC.197-11-680). REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION of the Site Plan Approval must be filed in writing on or before August 19, 1996. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for SRERC2.DOC/ City of Renton P/B/PW--Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action 16 Les Scwab Addition/Remodel--LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF August 5, 1996 review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of publication. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after,review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 4-8-11.B,which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on August 13, 1996 for the Environmental Review and before 5 p.m. on August 19, 1996 for the Site Plan Approval . Any appeal must be accompanied by a$75.00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. • • SRERC2.DOC/ ,....ir /1‘.. 't • \ 'V\ v.!`‘'\ . \ .:c) ',I!. [7:L;3S -1—"-E.17.--- cri -mill k•-••-,,,,---a. H -4936 .0 1 - • t • ja; F. , , . ._IRP,c , v 1 to fagRi, STRATbs LA45 '6.06 . Tr i ..\:,: G i 1t7zCQ,'• „aig_ 2\ ' . \ - C 'l U.1.16 st ... .3 • \ ' • SEARS -- - - • • W H5 E* STRATO LANES--. • • 'Z. ..i.,, \ 120 zrrlu - ' 77"----. , •:-..., -57 t• - BOWLING \ . G,.., -P/49/7.F0\ Maas: Ty'igj$8..a9=Le- -- ...:: - 00 :a . . 111=6 • L. • - , 585 4/s.75 .x.. . _Ax • ,. • CP- ‘ rl. : firA • Itl . ,,,. . • .4. 041 Ac. ..-' .3/0 82 ? •. 271.258. --- ..)\ R •i.,‘,. . nii :„....... , PAR 1cit40 \ ••-• ' 4? 79 :SU s, q 41 - \ I. !It 7:L.123 •t5\c S.P. 577-81 ,, ••• •••-- • . O. 4A: Q.N.Ip -5. A24 IF „ ,, \ ' . - • rt••::6: - -.Q 423 .. •. 417' \• 213 Cr.16 .. ' --' <9.'ea'Z'PO's 't MAril kci, KELLEFA. .t \ • im • aL,. 629 . ..%. CURRAN :Ce' .Insitizi HAR Y G.\ANER5ON" 0 621 -• ft-J.. • (2 ,-- Pr"; -T. .;4`. . -- -..-69*-- $-. - :17,10• . / i • • , -... ., --.•:-. 1 . -. 1-_ .. 7 ::: 0- 7 AC,• 1 .... 8 1 gcz 43 2- - . -414 4..--,:, °Kyr . ... •• , ,,mg- :-.- ,-. .._ -7.--:-.... Jr 44.,• . • .. . • Ls!gc. 744/.,74=ia. . . 7........e. b 5k., . T L./33 -4 taa--1- 6 0 :miler t _: :- io .. 9 : " • 234.60 - ' t'' '‘' ' '' ••T' 163 ., t- ____ ...V.11:__ • ' .....- 1. .:.--,..::-. 1:;•:6-1--:&17.'J.'.' 'r.- r,-.e:;:.: 41 °'...1.4-..-9•W. -'7 T.11 -'.."7' 7::-.7- ...... . , - • - -.....- •-I-i24.-6.„; . ...-- -- al:hi 7 . ., ,....6 . ‘, ..t.i. 24;1.98 *.if...... , • --111.5 . a I $ri- i • I I Isvravir .1' -_- Zi...79 -• 7 •,, I 1 -400 : cst4 1 . . . . ..9 . . CY '. / :2 i5: tafl[ ft.1 r. 11.1 /(2 ' 4 sl , new • -. ,,. . :.'' . , : -._ —• . ' > ;.1 (C2.0•Er.,i.tsv , GO I•1 ‘fk . ..- % ,-. z 4r4.1,•_:,•:' , _ • F. UiR ' - ',-:, i. •.,:-. CZ1 _:. , rh-/7 - ' - -• TA.. T.L 44 * LLI 'i '— 4 k.;, DIAMBill . 3.06 Ac. L.Li L.)ii La 0,: %.Pc- :..-1. Ac. • r-3 4.35 Ac Cr : • •' --3 .55 / CC" ICJ A . _.,._. ............ F.t% ,„ :53 Ac. ' .. : ,"C.' - 1 • . ,- . • _ . 40:16 L.3I . • Z LLI •D 0 . 1:L-' - CC , ri U • r . . . . • • • - e"'' • ::."-:- 7.-1..32. -73-3. 57 ; . , ".-•.' I ' 1 - '- SOOA :-• ':-,rt!%' . ., NI i . . , • ..V2 L • •‘.‘E.ik14 - : • • • - .• 'I.L.C.3• . , . - , •i1 -3- ,r ..•. i%_Ka„......1 sj??. . , ' ..• .-, • .. . .. . .'. •.. . ..:4 ,144 a. I, r•..0.,n‘. •‘.C",G.I"2 I.•.0k‘B3ii'a-. .-7 • S.l i • .•,-1• 14••4. •:'.. . P1'.i1 C . . • . 50 . ' 3•1 5 13• g -C1j• . ....• - : -\; ... 1 1 1 .. __ ,: . 40- , 1'd -...:.........•:•• k i I • I CI\I il -••".. eti1 .::::-::::::• . 1 .1' • /,-IC •::.:::::::•-"..:::::"-",-t.:.*:*-:::::•%'....• 1 FEE/0Af c° '' I 0 I I :f...., .11011 -1 et 4.t DpiR itice , , . , . .1 ---- ::-:-.•.-:-::•:- 4)- s""''It- ''""14632—---- . ... ' ,""•'i I - I 1, " 'T I ---•••••:-:•:-:•:•:•-•'• I L . 155-53 I 13i7::., 1 's C . I I _ . I :N:•:::-:•:.•.-- ; ,-F-Fiiii-r=------- di film ( 1.1 1.1i; /6:0::::: . i I I . k •...•...•7. , Ki ,I'' . : i I li /11(lig PA r r I :II I 1 14 ..• :•::. ,6, viOLID 1 ! • 'L. 11111 Whir too r , 1 4. - C•1 I 6' I ••••• , ___._0 ______1_1CC2=4.....1L2C4 . 1 , . . , e • ,..:!-I. 7....1... - I- ------ig , ,;52•670541 . -:'..-. • • : , .VAC4.rED , •, VACA-TED I I F51,s;ti .:. ..-. ,,, _i- t *-1-- 7-11 \\,(17--- -- .1. Wihnii; :,. ..-.:f! 1 —.-1" I i i n --.• i I, --(2)-.--,'‘ 1 i V-2------ i 1 . ' . . . . - - •.. . . .- . . • • . .:,•,-i-V,1; " •• • ' :••.:-.r..•••4':..:4 . . . . •:.,;t:',-fif.2 . . . - .• •..:.;•.:;tf,.i. . -,:•:.:..-.-•:•41.,. N89'50'24"1.0 PANTED TRAFFIC LINE 2661.90' Y.- 200 �y e� rnesoy /- SOLID YELLOW SS9BO833E 74' �---" T L 11 souriH[ 9I i r / l • _� I "� . `, .. — Addlltfortll to • s /_ .____ _ em ie. . . i ,..,:: Renton ":_dao OeLmwelp • e40 ...m.. .. a a a/ f' • '� if, S/ i / / /, ' ,'/ / ':.::.i:•' ,,...; • i �l� 'J . 4-EXISTING — \� ,(y ' 6' p b, ASPHALT—Y. 4 • esru..e. wu.—ru •LP .uA.r % I'1 0, N.41 • • C r _Am, / W W '• / ae •""`r.0 . y • r_ i ... m. ....® ... . . .=7.3..., — ..�... i •\, s i� ' . 5 N. t / `` <� • .• FNEW - ...o..vrwa.r.or.vre. "'� ..w. ......w.m.n..o�o. •.sr ..v..w 4 'e., • f PAVNG rN0 U . '• .. . GRAVEL—) .2.0..0.1000.o00e / • :] —.m—.... ... .o— ...— —. ..A......._..—,i. ... tee' 6 . J .••• ....OW eu IOW o MOONS rv..o ea..u..rm..r.m. rw y O �;:. PP11 I b ci::i : rams.....n...-.<a,�......�.... ......r�...,�.o.......—...,.. V. ___ a �� p Mae.... o....no..—n, .a..a. N o • woo-.+... %.,y`1 ro......... ................ an-.0-..�.......�.—....... - EXISTING `'° + D U07DRAW DRAWINGS VQ uirrMAP w i, , c &maw/PEU EOT a., er 46'bInl Al GOWN e.ecT r 911e FTJM k \ W C,ILDNG 1 J` . - .. M Y Laox v!LIRA•.ROI e6 R. u .Lode'LM1YID MTEe E F * . .• N {} A.1 poptlC.4aVATICW 41D CW4 etC1101 O D0+{ �r`.1 1V s Il c e Elam LI LANDSCAPE PLAN AlU. \N/f YJ .7 •11 SCALE 1••1b-b• ® a.....n.a G GIL PLAM e.OR.O.,WT. / M .O! N S Q 41 . Camay (GIrouujp An'c hfitt Architecture And Planning AIL • CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED AUG 0 2 1996 CITY OF RENTON SERVICES PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: August 2, 1996 TO: Jim Hanson, Mike Kattermann FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning OA SUBJECT: Les Scwab Addition/Remodel (File No. LUA-96-078, SA, V,ECF) Attached is the Site Plan Review Staff Report for the Les Schwab store proposed remodel/addition. The applicant is being asked to close off the northernmost of three driveways that access from Rainier Avenue South, and to use part of the parking lot area in the north corner of the site for additional site landscaping. The applicant has agreed to comply(see attached memo and plan from Paul Casey) provided that the previously proposed landscaped area in the southeast corner is no longer required. In addition, staff is requested a pedestrian circulation plan. The requested variance was approved by the Board of Adjustment on July 24, 1996. .4. MEMO.DOT/ AUG - 1 - 9 6 T H U 1 1 _ 4 9 THE C A S E Y GROUP P _ 0 1 •M The Casey G c. �� P r . ' .i ■11• Architects 10116 36th Ave.Ct.SW,Suite 109 DATE 1O0 NI l ( q Tacoma,Wa. 98499 • (206)584-5207 FAX:(206) 581-9720 ATTENTION J S PROJECT: TO AL2 0 1 1996 DEVELOI'NiEN f PLANNI We Are Sending You: CITY OF FUTON CiPtg)12-1 19p� L I Prints ❑ Mylars O Other - Fax —_ Sheets I,ih)uging Letter'-t�f Transmittal Xerox ❑ Disks ❑ ❑ Pick up ❑ Mail `/�OFR 44NAti TON NG Printing: 0 REPROGRAPHICS HOUSE ,kCASEY GROUP ❑ Delivery By_ COPES DATE NO. BILLING These Are Transmitted As Checked Below: ❑ As requested ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For approval CFor review and comment Cl For your use ❑ Approved as noted- ❑ Returned for correction ❑> REMARKS • COPY TO: - - SIGNED: _ AUG — 1 — 9 G T H U 1 1 : S ® THE CASE Y GROUP P - O 206-277-445 RENTON DEV SVCS/PLRN 709 P01 JUL 31 '96 15:13 , DRAFT F. Decision The Site Plan for Les Schwab Addltion/Remodei File No, LUA-96•078, SA, V, ECF is approved, subject to following conditions: CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall remove one compact parking space on the southwest corner of the subject site and replace It with additional site landscaping to match the landscaping proposed around the pole sign. The revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 1: t �i i�1MAST 1 wit l emu' of rt jC-fig 2. The applicant shall remove the northemm st driveway along Rainier Avenue South ' and reconfigure the existing parking areaj, ' . The revisions shall be R.1 31 submmitted to the Development Services Division for review and must be approved -FM A before the issuance of any building permits. 1r 417i; 3. A pedestrian circulation plan shall be provided to the Development Services Division v ks for review end approval. The plan shall demonstrate the existing or proposed ,° pedestrian circulation elements that allow for safe access between the sidewalk and (� r buildings, and between parking areas and buildings. This shall be accomplished 4C prior to the Issuance of building permits. fill c DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION July 29, 199Ik E D t - SIGNATURESF al Ntig:todev aiA31-6, L/' 0 � 1c :`- . 1 Jamas C.Hanson, Zoning Administrator date a �( i e(" .. r P 1 Jo Michael A Kartsrmann,Zoning Administrator data cp 'A r TRANSMITTED this 29th day of July. 1996 to rho Poet-It'Fax Note 7671 °sug1 1 ipso' ; al To rIaft' �ayai From.'. m k Co./ pt. Co, J 1 Phone A l r A i�+�„ Phone/ Z1 1/1 L t 0 g sRttzc�.aoci Olt N FLrr K Flow 511 1171,4 tom"` = U�R. 'u'j two; �� . i `Y gl ii 1'` l• am. :' i6 7 \ Z e 1 ia . >< a \ O. . ---, `O O O O ATM 3,7F,b0.Odit v ( \P :t ‘ 1, 4 .a. 41-:' • 0: .,, . „. // L5 ;E-Ili . i)1\ 'IV ?). \. 9 • . . ‘.. . • 1 � . \..f• \ \ ...)11 '......' ,•.. a. \ ,\A-1 141. 1 .„ 4. s,.. • . LI kk 9 • r-- ' ..1 /01/. \ t / • . f ft w. II \ • \ ii•. '' i . Aosimmob• r AM .. Hein '24 . „ . \ . lit, • 11111111L-_____.... / .4`... fall Nei aB .4111 "X Du:Er \ \\ V _i/• i 1 .rnr■wwr■■.r.w_ ti�wi� �i tv i li 1 gusiummuri • 11... . • VIIIIIIIk 4 ....,......are.ThrinfLaurzampaagend. our% r1 \•\ .\ r �,'+.r `h\ ` �w�. i�n■n`w■u� �:�~w t� y li ` • l�rrwtntrwwss• m ' �, - 0' i F mum ns ti \„, \ \ , .. ♦ 'i rtitsu� iu�wiw■w■,;�■.itar rw�z 4.• • \_ • \ •a' (, • •\ i NWWw.fdWtR'!•■l•A ■tU■■. .41 \ \ `"` F �. .�atrau. osrin�alw i • warm - w■ • m . \ \ \ ��9 \ \ 0IF aCifaas■■.■ *\ / \ .MI • 7 01/4 •\ \ •\ '46\ . C \ \ •.. r o ...7i,717 - /' ` ■■Was� ��■ •• wr ?:•':%%:;%:;i}%:%;iiiii:{i:?yi}SSi:+?t'n<:::?tS,%:%:::fi`::::::5`i:!:i::T::::}'.r:Y%Si>= ii::: • }:}:.::;::»::'iii}::;�;:•<:a»:>:::ir:�>:iiii?>x iiiiii?i:i':iy:i:.ii::iii:i':i:i:i:::<:iriii::y'ii:;'r:iviii>::::.}::.:.i::::: .. .. mommismoolonsmemonammotuteittaptANNINGEnvisioNnogionsomanmommosiiigiimiiiiiiii,. EMENNEEiglignagiiiiMMEMERAFFIDAVIr E ER. ICE€:BY AILING Y:€ On the (20 day of , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing MW cieTe Q.- tOV1S documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing TZeiSt. F..c:volocN utdclatinsil ki9_. T�v td �.� zar nak, t o f Ida •�.va4..rRcsQu aces Awrtk vsoin 1rt -Tvas)sr at,,,, Sum ^Rwr�ncca.i °f Sca-ttke_. Duwavvttak lVvAtan -t2 VY\ iC.OM , n519‘evles Vsnucklestuit lvszkt&W c- %deX' (Signature of Sender) 40. • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify'that I know or have satisfactory evidence tha & e4,_ . signed this instrument and acknowledged it to b his/her/their ree and voluntary act the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 000000000 �vM Dated: 7 '/.q� - �6"s'o op. • Notary P lic in an f he State of Wesirgtc}i;t-i n• Notary rint) / 11-1<'67 '° �� ',:;, My appointment expires: - -�.-. � . c ,%`..-' • Project Name: Les Sc..k,\Loab _ t kwn Project Number. %, _o,$ ' S N ` V 1 E -C NOTARY.DOC " '`', �' CIZ OF RENTON ha i -0, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor _ Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator , July 25, 1996 - _• - Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section - . PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 ; . Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on July 23, 1996: Mitigation Measures which are enclosed: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED , • , • - - LES SCHWAB ADDITION/REMODEL • LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF • • The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 s.f. single story'building and_add a 3,600 s.f. service bay. The project requires Site Plan Approval and Environmental Review. A variance is also requested. from the CA Zone requirement fora 10-foot landscaped strip along the street frontage: The.applicant instead proposes to provide landscaping in two areas, one along Rainier Avenue surrounding the existing:. pole sign, and a second at the SW corner of the parking lot. Location: 710 Rainier Avenue South. . The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The • comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on August 13, 1996. Following the end of the comment and appeal period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation..,Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington.98055.- . Phone: 235-2550. If you have questions, please call me at (206) 277-6186. " " For the Environmental Review Committee, , '°‘it7j --(6 ille41141'-#-). . Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Sue Rumery, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Rita Perstac, Puget Power AGNCYLTR.DOC1 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 C' This paper contains 50%recycled material,25%post consumer rY6t. CIT A OF RENTON loll +'h •. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor • Gregg Zimmerman P.E.;Administrator July 26, 1996 . . Mr. Paul Casey,A.I.A.. - The Casey Group Architects 10116- 36th Avenue Ct. SW Suite 109 Tacoma, WA 98499 SUBJECT: Les Schwab Addition/Remodel. Project No. LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF • Dear Mr. Casey: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that.they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project.'The Committee, on July 23, 1996, decided that your project may be issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: See enclosed Mitigation Measures document.' • Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required.15 day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's decision.- The required 14 day appeal period will run concurrently with the comment period. The comment/appeal period will end at.5:00 PM on August 13, 1996. Following the end of the "comment/appeal period, the City will finalize its Determination, unless comments received require a reevaluation. • • WAC 197-11-660 states that the responsibility for implementation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this V project, any mitigation measure established by the ERC not directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. . Appeal procedures and mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. •Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. . If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at 277-6186. • For the Environmental Review Committee, V • (--1-ef4R,v3-Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager DNSMLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ca l'-NO— . — - s . . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ' POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: LES SCH(NAB ADDITIONiREMODEL • PROJECT NUMBER: LUA•58.078,SA,V,ECF The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,703 s.f.single story building and add a 3,800 s.f.service bay.The project requires Site Plan Approval and Environmental Review. A variance Is also requested from the CA Zone requirement for a 10-loot landscaped strip along the street frontage. The applicant ' instead r Avenue pole sign, nds a secoes to nd the SW comide er of ha parking lot.In Iwo areas,one l Logcation1e710 Rainier Avensurrounding e South.the THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIONMENTAL REVIEW COMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED ' xsling THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A S GNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE . ENVIRONMENT. ' AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. nYOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION UNTIL 5:00 PM,__ THE CITY WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL UNTIL AFTER THIS DATE. 1 nAPPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, ® TH S DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,)1CsUST 19.1199 P.Tt ENCOMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. sky'". �` ^^�/~ 4., a?60 • ii , "°..;-- #i 11 t,are.0,01, 1• m. 4,1 paw _El;4 ". ' g1 ,; 1 . . • , pi eg • 2,:-..a 4,1 -.. 1 ,.,. , r ,!I.. w x 1 a 1 Y. Z I G 1`1 •e �° • .I ` ,. .�• ,.r . • \ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CODI SIGN ATHEE CITY.OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT ' DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. , • , CERTIFICATION I, J�il/�Vl I�-� I IeM�t , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby the descri ed property on • NItAlll 24. 1 4-4 Sign . t . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • SS COUNTY OF KING ) . � • certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that J0-A)A, 1 Ft T774 Ji1/J 1-9 1. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary•.act fo the•.uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ,.,•�\,`svn� ,Yo �' Dated: 7/ /9 �P . J• a n otary Pu in and for e State of sh gt€n ,; . ryi0:SAY . •Notary (P • t) M 6 T •,...„.„ .•.aftkt:.0 My appointment expires: &/GI/ � i NOTARY.DOC ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: LES SCHWAB ADDITION/REMODEL PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 s.f.single story building and add a 3,600 s.f.service bay. The project requires Site Plan Approval and Environmental Review. A variance is also requested from the CA Zone requirement for a 10-foot landscaped strip along the street frontage. The applicant . instead proposes to provide landscaping in two areas,one along Rainier Avenue surrounding the existing pole sign,and a second at the SW corner of the parking lot. Location: 710 Rainier Avenue South. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE •(ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION UNTIL 5:00 PM, . .THE CITY WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL UNTIL AFTER THIS DATE. APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, XXX YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 13, 1996 OR APPEAL i THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,AUGUST 13, 1996. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. • ,tern 6 • r"." , &Mf ii�: `. .. SN; 7 Y7--`t CNRISIDM[RSOR _' U� r.l' i 4j0/ e. ` • ''', "7;10 nn -_'7R.1 _ Ts" 0f O pS1 404 al } . �i.., S 4 Sn an •i.1.:n eIA V ..f 60.E 9 \`Vl r 43t, irq)7, g Tail LENTO,SHOFE • .- < e sv,ve, ,::.i _ E L 1^ \ .'e iv 1 .I( .°. eELLIR L f Z i:,. , e Z "RR"N NA r e wwsoN r .'e.E i 7(• 1 NOM1 L EDWARDS ,, / ` I"— T ���777_ -�-d k �.��._--,•--.—.i-a'._.ir.S.W.—i7TH-•—ST. -_� —._._17r—•---- .?�'-;,: =t--,P ®G C SIO"C I O I :r 5'iftt .r.t • 1 =, u R.. ' tlW Xm _ W P. I R j v c ro �o i _„ Di""teRi tt, cc ISs.N • 1 s s : L f GR z f.u: . •• __. , �._!ll S.i �� 1' al ;`` O 1 _._i I I ,Ir .l u a ,N` t. • .= i_ II ,n '' r eORTHE" -� 5 y ri'p I 9VA.SN�TON �: gpQ .. pow OE WaT GRAB i.T . 7 AEI ! __�: ..i' 1 Aso m la N. —fi t. Ili. i I I ;iN FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Pleas,e'includethe project°N,UMBER':when':calling`:for proper:file;identification •` CITY OF RENTON __ DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF APPLICANT: Paul Case (The Casey Group Architects) PROJECT NAME: Les Schwab Addition/Remodel DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 s.f. single story building and add a 3,600 s.f. service bay. The project requires Site Plan Approval and Environmental Review. A variance is also requested from the CA Zone requirement for a 15-foot landscaped strip along the street frontage. The applicant instead proposes to provide landscaping in two areas, one along Rainier Avenue surrounding the existing pole sign, and a second at the SW corner of the parking lot. LOCATION,OF PROPOSAL: 710 Rainier Avenue South LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required ,under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 p.m. on August 13, 1996. Appeal procedures and the.mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. PUBLICATION DATE: July 29, 1996 DATE OF DECISION: July 23, 1996 SIGNATURES: / 1H 7 l Gregg Zi rman dministrator DATE Departme ht f PI ning/Building/Public Works r J— m Chastain, ministrator DATE Community Service Department 41v.-A. rCe 777-3 Le eeler, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF APPLICANT: Paul Case (The Casey Group Architects) PROJECT NAME: Les Schwab Addition/Remodel DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 s.f. single story building and add a 3,600 s.f. service bay. The project requires Site Plan Approval and Environmental Review. -A variance is also requested from the CA Zone requirement for a 15-foot landscaped strip along the street frontage. The applicant instead proposes to provide landscaping in two areas, one along Rainier Avenue surrounding the existing pole sign, and a second at the SW corner of the parking lot. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 710 Rainier Avenue South MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall be required to pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee is based on a rate of$75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. This fee is due prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee of $0.52 per square foot of new building (less demolished area). The Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated to be $1,404 based on 2,700. square feet X $0.52/square foot. The fee is due prior to the issuance of building permits. The Site Plan for Les Schwab Addition/Remodel File No. LUA-96-078, SA, V, ECF is approved, subject to following conditions: - CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall remove one compact parking space on the southwest corner of the subject site and replace it with additional site landscaping to match the landscaping proposed around the pole sign. MITMEAS.DOC/ CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF APPLICANT: Paul Case (The Casey Group Architects) PROJECT NAME: Les Schwab Addition/Remodel DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 s.f. single story building and add a 3,600 s.f. service bay. The project requires Site Plan Approval and Environmental Review. A variance is also requested from the CA Zone requirement for a 15-foot landscaped strip along the street frontage. The applicant instead proposes to provide landscaping in two areas, one along Rainier Avenue surrounding the existing pole sign, and a second at the SW corner of the parking lot. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 710 Rainier Avenue South Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General: 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 2. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City, state, county, federal and other jurisdictional regulations, codes and policies governing the project and site. 3. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate submittals prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, according to City of Renton drafting standards. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000, 4% of anything over$100,000 but less than $200,000; and 3% of anything over$200,000. One-half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. Fire Prevention: 4. The preliminary fire flow required is 3,750 gpm. Four fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed structure and three fire hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. It appears that existing hydrants meet this requirement. 5. Buildings shall comply with Article 81 of the Uniform Fire Code for high-piled combustible storage (tire storage area). This shall include the addition of smoke vents and a fire alarm system in the tire storage area. Police --Crime Prevention: 6. An additional 1.86 police calls for service are estimated annually. The applicant is advised to contact Renton Police Crime Prevention at 235-2571 for advice in securing construction sites against theft and vandalism. ADVNOTES.DOC/ i_ . AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION • Jessica Borg • , being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS ---7__ 600 S. Washington Kent, WA. 98032 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL 9 DETERMINATION _ RENTON, WASHINGTON a daily newspaper published six (6) times week. •Said newspaper is a legal ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE The Environmental Review Committee newspaper ofgeneral circulation and is now and has been for more than six 1 SERC) has issued a Determination of wi n- gnificance — Mitigated for the following months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the project under the authority of the Renton English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Wash- 1 Municipal Code. LES SCHWAS ADDITION ington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order ! LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. _ - .- . Applicant requests environmental checklist The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Valley Daily News , review, variance, and administrative site (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers r plan approval. Location: 710 Rainier Ave- ! nue So. during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a The 15 day comment/14 day appeal peri- ods for this project will run concurrently and i Notice of Env Det i end at 5:00 p.m. on August 13, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation mea- sures imposed by the City of Renton's Envi- 1 ronmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division,Third • Floor 7—2 9—9 6 on 98 55.(Phonci al e 235 25 0e You nton,Washing- e was published on , prepared to make specific factual objec-, The full amount of the fee charged for said fo g oing public tion is the sum of : tloPublished in the Valley Daily News July 29, 1996. 1883 $ 36 .49 -- ----- --- i Leg t I C erl , ale Daily Ne . Subscribed and sworn before me this rr(-- day of A 19 _ S_!®fir®�Air�.sy. /t .��Y —Lie_ f� i { /7'�la� • . tYlF�`'i'� bGG " I ��\'�5S10N F'h�'i�:L�'J, Notary Public or the State of Washington • ''•o yp t AR y <"u,; residing at a - 4c 'I King County, Washington • \cp';‘,3teviy.v 7/Act/g> 0 . OF ,w AShs,90 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON; WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. LES SCHWAB ADDITION LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF Applicant requests environmental checklist review, variance, and administrative site plan approval. Location: 710 Rainier Avenue So. The 15 day comment/14 day appeal periods for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 p.m. on August 13, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Publication Date: July 29, 1996 Account No. 51067 c I1 . dnsmpub.dot ., -' ••••••-••••••/•••••:.•:•.•••:•••••-••••••.::::::••::::...c..:••••:......:::'i;.•:•-•.•.::-......:.:::::::::•;::::.::.:_:::::::".•:i.:.• ••••:i.:.-•":'...:.:.-•:' L-•• ADJUSTMENT •••,....•.•.,.,..........i,:i..i.........:•,••.:•:(i.••::••:•:::::'.....i.-....::. BOARD:••••••••••••:::•'2'.. ---.. i.:.:::.:::•.:::::.!::::i..!::::.:::::::::::;.::::::::-:::i..::.::'...i:.:-....;...:.:;:::::::f..!::.:..:::-::.:::':.:"...:::.i.::::::1:...:::::::;g::::::::::.i.;i,.::::izii:ii..6?::.::.iti:::::.4::::g::::'...:;,:!:i..:::!!.,..::::::-...:..-:.:- :: :::::::':::::::•'...!:1-11i-:::.:1::::::.:.;:.::::i:!;-':..i.:.:i!:::::;;..:::::;:::::::::i:...!..:::::::::!.:.:::::::.:.:::::: ::1..:::::::::: ::ii:.::i:-....::::..:::::.:::::::.:...:::i.:::;::.;:::::::...::::;:::•::.: ..........:::..:::::::::::.:i..:y..?:::::.:•:•:!::;.:::::.:.:::::::::::::;,-+As• p.,..REPORT :.i.:.„.:.:„...............:....... .::.::::.::.:.........,........:.•...2...::::..;::.:::,...i...::::i.:::::::...::::...:. ....:...:.......:...............i..:::::.:.... •p...!n...:.... ...........:.::1::.....::::.....:::::.::::::....:::::.....) ::::: ::::.....:: :....i:::i::..:::::i-:.:::;:: ::.:::::;::::::::::::.....::::f...::::.-::::::::.:.i::::.....::::.:iz..::.::.-:::.:sia.::::i..::.:::::..::::-:::-.....:.: ::.:::.::::..i.:::::.:::.:... .........:.:,...::::::::.:-:.:.:.:....::.::.....::;:i.:::.:::::.::•.:1:.::::i.i. :?ii.,i:::....:::.•:.:i:i:.:y::.::::....::..::::::.::::::::::::r:ii::i::::Iii:.:::::;:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .:::i.,..::.:,:::::-:•::•:-:::::::::: ::.i:::,....::::i:::::::: :.:::;:::::::::::i.:::::::J„:.::::i.:::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::-:.:.i::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.f::::::::::::.g::::.;ii-i::.:.:R::: .::..;:i.:.:. .:::;:....:•::.-:.:....:T.:::;::::i:.::::.•:::::::...:.::.::::::...:::i:::ii::::::::.-.:-......:::.i.i.::::.:.:1:.:i•::: ::::.::::::ii:::iii.:iii:.:i:i.::.::.:2.......::.:.:r:: .:........:: 4.,.. 1996::: .....:::... ...........::.::72:...:.::::::,;.:::::.:::.?:,:::.•:!::::::..i!:.:...-.::;:.:.:::::.:,;:,.......:•?:::,,,-:;,.::::..:.:.:.::::::::.:::::::.::....,....-::::-.i:.:-..:.:-.:::J::E.--"::.i.:.:-.:i:.:....:.::::::- • .... iviATioN:.::::.:.•:::::;;.::........:cl.:.;,:i.:.:::::::.-..:.-:::...:::::i.:.-.::.:i.:.i:-..1:::-:7,::::..::.:' --: •group:Afohiteos)::::-.::::i!.....:.:::::::.ii;:..:.::.:-,:::::. A;.:::::,..!-.!i.::::i:.§um ...:......:...::::.:.:;.:..:.:...,::;:.::: ::i,040...C . PY:':.(The Casey:,:i.::,...„ :•:.::::;;.::::::1.:.:?..7.:.i:::!:.?::::::::::::::::::::.;-.:::::!i.:'..: :1:::f:::;......::::::: ::: :;:!:::;iii:?....:i:K:!...t.:::.:::.:r.::.::: :::8!ii :.: ::Igt.::::.i2] ::::....::::.:i.....:i ...-:',..:'.....:,...:1,-.:.. 'i;:::::: ::13::).::•?...i:....1.i.:;:'........::'...:',":1,.....::;:.:•:...ii::..:::::::::'.': ,i..:.,,ii*.:atjEL:i:.:.:1.;-''':::-..:'''...::;:.'i::.:::•;;;;;.:i.:::::::::I:..;:::.?...::::,::5411:.E.:;::::::::::::155:s.:.0j:.!:':i::::::::: . e*....*:,*:::•:.,::: APPLICANT -......'::...::: .:•..:: •:..:::i:••::::•.:.:.:.:::.:.::::•::::.ki.:::::::::,:;:::::-.::::::::::::.:::i.1::,;:.:.:;i.::)...::.:..]:-.::-?..-:::•:••••••,iLES ir AbDiTiptsy.RFT:.,.:•:.:::,:,,i,:::::.:i:.]•.::.:,:f:::..::.:.::.iii'i!:.:::••::.:.?:??::W'•---::.:•.:.:::::.:::.:••:•*•:.:•:fe-- .............•..::::.:.:......:.:, i•'••:-..........:•:••••'::::::::.:-:PROJECT..T:'••••••:ki::.:i.:...•. :. :.....:::••:::::::::::•::::':;.'4:::::.!;:!:..:.•i••:::::'::::....:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::......:.: ..•.,.......::-•::i•:•:::-.:::::::•:::::•;ii:::•:•:iti*:::::•::::'..:;.:::i':-:;:::.;.::.:.:.::ii:.....:••::::-:::::.:.:...::::,•:::::•:::,:;:i.:::]..:::::.:::-...:•:.:.,.i.:•.:•:.::::.::::::::i...,:•:::: ::::.i:;:.0•:-;:.:i:::;::::,i::.:::::::::::....:.:,......f.i-.., ..,..s.:•••••:••••:.i••::::-:.::::::..:: :::::::...:::::.:..:.::.i!:•••::.:..•:•••::::::.....;:.:.:::::::.:.i.:. •:?..••••':::'::.':,.: ..-.•::::::•:.:.::..:::::::i:::::•:::.:••i:i•:.:.:::::4...k..... ...i.tvi;..,::.....:•,,::::.:,:.:....:::]..4:::•:::i•:ii:i.::.:;:,.:::::i::..,..:::::::.:i...x.:,:.:;,.......:.:::::::::::c.::::•.:.:......,.:::.:,..,,,,...::............,........ ....:::::::::::?......::::.:...:... .. :..:1•-::•:•:•••::: •••••••.f.........:'........,;:.....:•.......:..1.:.:•:...i„::i.i.i..i.i:........:.:;...,Li.::::.:;:::: :....:::.::.::•::•:1:::. :. ,:.:.:;;!•::: ::!tikii::::,,i::::.::::!iziit4. 9::.. 97,!!M..7:: :i,:e.::•:•;•••-..t.-:.:•••••••:::•:•:.:-.i.::::-.•••:...::::•.:::...,..:.......,::::,,.;:s.,....:::::::::.:.,...i.,:i..R.:-.A..i•:;;;::•:::.:0.•&•;;iigIiiat:•••:, :.:-..-1::•",:i:::i::.: A: 46C f.dAtit4:.:TISR;:;: :::;:7.:.:: :.i.:.: :.:::::::::•:!..::::i?!:::::.:.::::':1::::.:::::i:::•:•:::!;.!::::•:::::::::::::::::::: it..,.:•;iw...660.1.0ci....4q9p....; :cp.1 :::... ..,;:.:, s .:•':••••••::::::i:;:.::::•••:...:::::.:::::N.:::::::i::i.:....:::.:::::::::::•.::.:;:•••::::.••••::::'i':'::••••••••••:..:-.:-.:......*:::.:....:......:.:::...:::.,.:::i.:,:...:..::::;.::.::::::.:::•:::=:.::.fem :w844••:iiii.pp000:.:.•;9......r,.71.y9!...,:,.:!•!square...t....§t-:..§ fyipe bay. An ..i 7. .-:-.:•,:-....:::.--..-..• .. ...:..::....,.::..::..,::,....ri::::,:::::•.:.:i....::i::::....,:::: :. ? :::.,:,::,,.,..!:.::.:ri:i....,...rt ,:.:fl?.?1!... ....:.::iiiiitareo:,:::000::,.. 10.... .: .,p:uut.::. . foot de:-.1DeY:::wo.utd.::::P0...:.[.0.,..91.6cod..611:j°0."..iciii•at.'..r@!::. ,L::::':':'•.:R:V.60:ttecOg§T'.i.;:ii.::.:: '.;: in.die.••story••.••• :.••:-•••-• foot service sent'.. .•-• .R..:•:. .:.-• ,..•-•b al& .. 4 • :•',.:E••••:•'4.:. ::•:.•:.1::::':::::::i;:i:•'NP. U.I.V1.1W?.;f?;;;.:.,F.•::::::.:.:::::...::::.,::::......:.*:..7:::e::-..": ....' -:. :••:•:•::..... '. •.; ,iir.ii.i.:900.:,*-4up re..:::;,...,:, ::•.:.:..*1,;taloiog:.area...:W........ $.. d foref.1•:::16.t01.1',Ot 29:..: .••••••::-::::-..•:..3i:•:,::::iT:•:i:'.:::i.:::::;..1.:::::!:.: ::•i.:::.•P:::•:::::::•:;:::1::.ii:::::'::....•.:i:.:.•:.•....:::. ...-..§.:ii:i;:::••:::::3:::,:i:.s;;:i:•:..:::•:i:•:::::A::•:•:•.:..:ip?..!.:;? ;;,.... ..i.,lig:::...of ii*:iFsi:9R95 ‘....::i.,(4,;iftd..,..b6::::10.51,g31. . :::iii36,1„.....ii.i.6::.5 .:..::'•::-..::; :i..ii.::::::::.:::.,:::.:-,.,::i:L:i.,:.::! .9:.r 146;,6. -:;:i.04:::ip4qpqq::.1,"..1147ige.oci40:-...-.. .:i.)-(1r..., ,z7litii :.t: :.!] 1-19!..7. :.% . i8- 6:.:::i.ii:::::::::;:.7t1ZiqFPe% . ::6.66-ifiiorbrqtX9 -/. ::....7"T6iii':::iii :d Zone '.........:::::.:;if:;:i:i;ii:2;::.i.:.:::::,•.::::::.q.iii:1,:::;i::.::::.:::i.i:...ii:.:::::::::::!.... .ii:::::::::.:i:ii::.:.:::::::.::::.:::'... ].... ...:::.::.,:::..,:i:: pAr)s51p.: 5::::::.. Ig.:':i5t;:,IptArterial. .....?.---.:15-fo1.4 landscaped .,!-.1p proposed, p!t ::::::::::::::::::: :: :::::::::::::::::::::::: .........:-.1wo.:] is requires .:... providede be :: :.::::...,::i,:::No.:-..!P.,...:,....,... . ''.......:6einstalle0:.ilr1.....:..,..'- ''''''........:':.:<.:**:'1.?::::.:.*:.:"...: N.;:..1::':i.'?':..Yi.::::".::::::i.:'2;:j:*:ii.:.''''::::...::'''.:: :;.:...:.::',...j'..:5:'::: ::::.•::'::::')i.:-:::':::'::-.gfrg6i'..:.'06*69 ..:.....w..:R.........--dged:04t..,.......::::,::: ::.landscaping.;:.:.e.61 signe... . (..1ri.. inier ........::.......f the ld'iiifidu surround e...::P.,,.• .:.. •• located.... .-. ::at '::::...?.....::.::'::::::.':::.::".:*".':::::••••:..:1.'...:'''':::.•••••:.•;:'"'.•:::•:.::••••••'•••••••:•••••••::•••••:•."••: •••':'•'••••••':•::-$1:111steq0;''••••:.:::::•:::•:.applicant:•:::.T.. 6:.area::iwoP.,..i... .....-:::-:../.....ew•ciuld.:.4g.. .:...:.,....,. ''...........::',...:::•'::::.....":::•:'•:]'•••1:::••••:**:::••••••::...':•:::.:'::::"''''...::::::'::.:.:•':::••••:.•••••.:"....:••::::.•:••:::•••••:•••::::•••••••:••:.i-::::::'•:-.::•••••••:•....-s:.ciii:::th6.•.-site.::::oP.:-.?..:•••:.•,•••••i ei••:lafidgeaP00...::p.. ..,::: : .i::.The proposal . ---..i::..]:.;::::.:':•.:.:::::::.$1....::':...:-.::::::::-.:I.:.::....:...::.:::::::::::.:,:::.:.•:•.;ii...:•:i:::i::.•:::::::::.:::::::::•:•:....:..:.:.::•:::.:•:::...:.••••:::.:.:isi:::::::r:::::::.:1.:;i:::::•'..,..arP":7•• •••. •,3Iitit;.•-:faiiE1?ttl .:9.,..,..FF.,......... ifiiii:.iffe.!.35.0.k410..1p...f.::::. ...:. ..iv...,..; lan lt!'I'' Igie.16i /iOQO::.i #if.'j:i! P.'I' '1; li :.,..e.:.:::*il4r#!:I'.!.'ij..I.:.1")r!1!:!lri!'.... !:. fr.:....s: approval • •.•••••:••••••.:',."::::'''::"•:•::::':.:•••••••:::i':•••••••••.-':::.'/•:.•:: .-- -••....:...::::"1::.......'••••.:::::.:.::::,::.arid:Y.requires. environmental....••....:.:....i.•:.......:-..:-:-.:':-::-...::::.:;:;::.:.•: •:...::::?:••......::.:::...::•:i..:::.:::::......i:.....•::,::.:.::::•:::.•••-:. :: - - - . :".:..••••••••••••::•:::::::.;:i.:::::•i::::i::i•N:::.i.::.i::::•:!....:•:,..:.::.:.......:•.........:.: . : .• .. .: ...f: •••:...• .:.-.if,..: - ..:.:::::::::::::::: -.:.:.:-.::.:,::.::::::.:.:.:•:,....i...,...::::.:,....:::.-i.-::.•:..,.!..::.:.:..::.......:::.:•,::::.:::.::.-...,::.--......... • •: :•..... " :..... .:-......:...'..:'...:?....::::':•:::::::::::.::::••• •ii:O.:Aiiiii07•01.91.?Fge..-.-.....,......, South , . ,- ,_ , • • • LOCATION: .:..:4 ::......PROPOSAL. ..t-i.•:.::+1.:;.:•!::''.1.:':•••::::.:..•- . .... • IA 'au.klk{.4. • `...A ,.,.. .c.$0., vv. . ...i . . ...... . . ,Exr 7"..ACI • . kd 1=1 •... ••• htl i Liss 4.4. .7.Y•:" :4; '..trria- . Zinr"i EAT I. EDWARD'S % 4./ "4.1..-.; • :.. .•• . • 1 1,01 , .. ;1_,F„......7. 2/A.AckAsc. . . . . . • 14...7.142,.s.w...-i'Y TH.-' , • • c'....r.'''s .;i: 1"*" 1 um -.___.---......--,:•-•7---.7*--i4 • ' -.rt.r—i • 4. . , --..- 7"----. 171 '1 1 0.- • "' 1 1 n'Cli rat-r_IV. . -0- L..,,j• . e a I w a, e• , ., „ • ...,,, . ., •' F.N:'• ,•:' G ill ''''' •I 4.0 "1 4.• . . 0 11 • -1;-t-T—I2i•I' : .1 la '" .-" t4° • 19!:S ,Project Location Map BOARPTDOC BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPOR LES SCHWA DITION/REMODEL LUA-96-078,V,ECF,SA July 24,1996 • Page 2 of 3 •. • • 1. Environmental Review and Administrative,Land Use Approval. The Environmental Review Committee is scheduled to consider this proposal at their regularly scheduled meeting on Tuesday, July 23, 1996. The Zoning Administrators will consider the Site Plan at the same time. No decisions or recommendations had • been issued at the time of the preparation of this Staff Report. Staff will update the Board at the public hearing regarding the recommendations of.the ERC and Zoning Administrators. 2. Variances Requested: The CA.Zone.requires that lots abutting or fronting public streets have a minimum landscaping strip of 15 feet (Code Section 4-31-10.4.D.6.a.(1). The applicant is requesting a variance from this development standard in order to allow the expansion of the current building, while allowing the existing vehicular access and circulation to remain. Presently, there is no landscaping.along the street frontage. The Les Schwab tire center has been in place for many years and has already lost space for parking in front of the store due to earlier widening of Rainier Avenue South. The remaining narrow space in front of the existing tire center is used as -a drive aisle that connects the southern and northern existing parking areas and • driveway access points onto Rainier Avenue. The applicant states in their request that the requirement for landscaping along the frontage would result in the loss of the existing driving aisle that connects the access points and the on site parking areas. This would result in additional traffic congestion on•Rainier, as on-site circulation would then either heed to enter and exit on Rainier, or, go through the rear gated storage areas in • • order to access different areas of the site. The proposed building.expansion does not effect or limit the existing on-site vehicular circulation. The applicant is proposing that as a trade-off, the amount of required landscaping be consolidated into two areas on the site, one 574 square foot plating island surrounding the pole sign, and a second 1,909 square foot landscaped area in the southern corner of the site. • :C'���<�'>�> `VARI . I�I. .E.. .ON.DIT. .N ............................ .... "The Board of Adjustment shall have authority to grant a variance upon making a determination, in writing, that the conditions specified below have been found to exist:" • 1. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to. deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The applicant believes that the property owner would suffer undue hardship if the variance is denied because the front on-site inter-connecting driveway will be lost. This.driveway connection is required for the owner to enjoy a substantial property right possessed by a majority of area landowners (i.e., the provision of reasonable on-site circulation space to accommodate the existing use of the site). In addition, the small size and triangular shape of the property, combined with access from only one side of property limits building expansion design options for the property owner. Strict application of the Zoning Code Standards, which require the front landscaping would deprive the land owner from continuing use of the property to the same level, because the on-site circulation would be severely limited. . This potential lack of circulation restricts the. current level of commerce enjoyed by the property owner and ' other property owners in the vicinity. The existing narrow drive providing the on-site cross access was created by the previous widening of Rainier Avenue South. ',l 2. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to ••• the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: • • BOARPLDOC. , BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF R 2T LES S AB ADDITION/REMODEL LUA-96-078,V,ECF,SA Illy 24,1996 Page 3of3. The applicant believes that the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity as the site is currently developed and the proposed development would not worsen an existing situation. In fact, the owner proposes to improve the general appearance of the street frontage by adding landscaping in a planter around the existing pole sign to the north. 3. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: The applicant believes that the granting of the variance will not constitute any special privilege for this landowner because the variance will only allow the continued use of the property to the same level as adjacent landowners. The small size and triangular shape of the property combined with existing site development and access from only one side (Rainier Avenue•South) limit the options of the owner for expansion. The combination of these conditions does not appear to exist elsewhere in the immediate vicinity. 4. That the approval as determined by the Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that.will accomplish the desired purpose: The applicant believes that the requested variance is the minimum variance required to allow the property owner continued use of the property to current levels. Staff does not fully concur in that there is an opportunity to provide an area of additional landscaping (130 - 200 square feet) into the proposal in the southwest corner, via the elimination of one compact parking stall adjacent to Rainier Avenue. This would then be the minimum variance possible given the applicant's proposal to construct an addition and utilize existing site access and circulation. BOARPT.DOC / AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ,TPq,i r•a Borg , being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the Legal a ,of.the files noted above are on file lirlhe Development Services VALLEY DAILY NEWS Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. All interested persons to said peti- 600 S. Washington Kent, WA. 98032 tions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing to express their opinions. • a daily newspaper published six (6) times week. Said newspaper is a legal LES SCHWAB ADDITION newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF proposes F monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to, printed andpublished in the Theiapplicant,7 proposes to remodelilan existing 5,700 sq.ft. single story building English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Wash- and add a 3,600 sq.ft. service bay. A varl- ington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order _ ance has been requested from the require --nail ion tXJAHu or-AW US t MENT ment for a 15 ft. landscaped strip along ttw`. of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. • NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING street frontage. Instead the applicant pro- The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Valley Daily News A Public Hearing will be held by the Ren- poses landscaping in two areas, one on (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers ton Board of Adjustment at its regular meet- Rainier Ave. So. and another at the SW ing in the Council Chambers,on the second corner of the parking lot. during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on Published in the Valley Daily News July July 24, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. to consider the 12, 1996. 1812 Notice of Public Hearing following variances. SPRINT BASE STATION LUA-96O77,ECFACU,V The applicant seeks approval to con- struct a personal communication system at was published on 7-12-96 aew�telocaedontopofank thee. waernten- tank • and a 150 Sq. Ft. base station would be The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing ublication is the sum of ! located at the base of the tank. As pro- posed, the antennae will exceed the height limitation for the R-10 zone and reach a $ 64 . 57 ' height of 148 feet. Location: 3410 NE 12th St. 1 RCH TECHNICAL INSTITUTE LUA-96-079,V r L al Clerk, Valley ail Ne The applicant(Heath Signs)seeks a vari- ance to the front yard setback requirements of the Medium Industrial(IM)zone in order —�— e. �+ to locate a pole for the sign within four feet Subscribed and sworn before me this2 day of V -"�J 19 7 of the property line.The leading edge of the (LL sign would be adjacent to the property line. Location: 500 SW 7th. r# ��N M. FFf� 4 ti . ,,..) -f�,3.0 Notary Public or the State of Washington +8rt :o`. D T A R y-P':J' residing at-Att trt E •o • * ` King County, Washington 1, ,n•.G PUsL\C co:= 1 VISNI.114MKe d7/92 ,00 •,`v.l I C.'I ;1.••• ' \,,0,' 1 F . ...ty RENTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Board of Adjustment at its regular meeting in the Council Chambers, on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on July 24, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. to consider the following variances: SPRINT BASE STATION LUA-96-077,ECF,ACU,V The applicant seeks approval to construct a personal communication system at the Highland Water Tank site. The antennae will be located on top of the water tank and a 150 Sq.Ft. base station would be located at the base of the tank. As proposed, the antennae will exceed the height limitation for the R-10 zone and reach a height of 146 feet. Location: 3410 NE 12th St. RCH TECHNICAL INSTITUTE LUA-96-079,V The applicant (Heath Signs) seeks a variance to the front yard setback requirements of the Medium Industrial (IM) zone in order to locate a pole for the sign within four feet of the property line. The leading edge of the sign would be adjacent to the property line. Location: 500 SW 7th. LES SCHWAB ADDITION LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 sq.ft. single story building and add a 3,600 sq.ft. service bay. A variance has been requested from the requirement for a 15 ft. landscaped strip along the street frontage. Instead the applicant proposes landscaping in two areas, one on Rainier Ave. So. and another at the SW corner of the parking lot. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing to express their opinions. Publication Date: July 12, 1996 Account No. 51067 BOAPUB DOC CIA t., - Nal ri .I -..__ _- _-]- L1\710 .' BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT WILL HOLD A . , . , PUBLIC HEARING IN . CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL ON JULY 24, 1996 BEGINNING AT 7:30 PM PROJECT LOCATION: 710 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH • PROJECT NAME/NUMBER:Les sAeQb gp)) . LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF - • DESCRIPTION: THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO REMODEL AN EXISTING 5,700 SOFT. SINGLE STORY BUILDING AND ADD A 3,600 MET.SERVICE BAY. AN EXISTING 900 SCUT. SERVICE BAY WOULD BE DEMOLISHED AND THE RESULTING SIZE OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING AREA WOULD BE 6,400 SQ.FT. THREE NEW PARKING STALLS WOULD BE ADDED FOR A TOTAL OF 20 PARKING SPACES. THE APPLICANT SEEKS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, SITE PLAN APPROVAL,AND A VARIANCE FROM THE ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL ZONE WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM 15-FT.LANDSCAPED STRIP ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGE. NO LANDSCAPED STRIP WOULD BE PROVIDED,INSTEAD THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THAT LANDSCAPING WOULD BE PROVIDED IN TWO AREAS,ONE SURROUNDING THE POLE SIGN ON RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH, AND ANOTHER AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PARKING LOT. • .- rs-- • � • x1''1/(�g�r��yry ,.,1���+al .: .-,:_may- , - DATE OF POSTING: • DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION • I, .11hi fIY I4evi K l • . hereby certify that ✓ copies of the above document I were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on 0.1144 11-, 14 a Si,ned: . '� fr- ff el STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that J/ ,'V U c---% ,yhl l��- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act"fora. a;,Ises and purposes mentioned in the instrumen .' •= ti,:• S. ..--" . jik Dated: ?/c)—//6 i� ......o . . Notary P is in and • the State al?tlas ifilg rm''i- Notary (Print) I11I1-, 64 T'�Jld`/�.Cc S•tA-tZ- My appointment expires: 9/'d-..,.,. . NOTARY.DOC -< Y O G A NOTIK!IE seP•NrvO� BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL ON JULY 24, 1996 BEGINNING AT 7:30 PM PROJECT LOCATION: 710 RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Les Sal Nal 4';011 LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO REMODEL AN EXISTING 5,700 SQ.FT. SINGLE STORY BUILDING AND ADD A 3,600 SQ.FT. SERVICE BAY. AN EXISTING 900 SQ.FT. SERVICE BAY WOULD BE DEMOLISHED AND THE RESULTING SIZE OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING AREA WOULD BE 8,400 SQ. FT. THREE NEW PARKING STALLS WOULD BE ADDED FOR A TOTAL OF 20 PARKING SPACES. THE APPLICANT SEEKS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, SITE PLAN APPROVAL, AND A VARIANCE FROM THE ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL ZONE WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM 15-FT. LANDSCAPED STRIP ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGE. NO LANDSCAPED STRIP WOULD BE PROVIDED, INSTEAD THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THAT LANDSCAPING WOULD BE PROVIDED IN TWO AREAS, ONE SURROUNDING THE POLE SIGN ON RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH, AND ANOTHER AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PARKING LOT. .,'..0. --07. g •,F1 -in 1.11. ,-,, • ..,. : , . 4,.n., 12 ... ,i y,, .....4).44 a c • • �,.. �... °' ee��o...£ N ..- - -- .. 4-.../ - t ..‘7 ^' .,jij:::J 10' e: i DATE OF POSTING: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Documents "LL CII OF RENTON OSI `='w. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • • • July 10, 1996 • Mr. Paul Casey, A.I.A. The Casey Group Architects 10116- 36th Avenue Ct. SW • Suite#109 ' Tacoma, WA 98499 • • - • SUBJECT: .' . Board of Adjustment Meeting '-. _ - - Les Schwab Addition/Remodel : - • • Project No. LVA-96-078,SA,V,ECF.• Dear Mr. Casey: The date of Wednesday, July 24, 1996, at 7:30 p.m., has been set for a variance public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment will be held . " in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is-required to be present at the public hearing.- Interested parties are invited to attend. If you have any questions, please call 277-6186. • Sincerely, jx..% 6-(1 .. • •, Jennifer Toth.Henning Project Manager • • boamtltr 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material,25%post consumer • City on Department of Planning/Building/P 'orks -,' ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW 9IIE , AI/ �T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS DUE: DULY 15, 1996 ✓U� O' '0 M APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 02, 1996 �. , 9 APPLICANT: PAUL CASEY(ARCHITECT) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNINGic, taig PROJECT TITLE: LES SCHWAB ADDITION/REMODEL WORK ORDER NO: 78107 41 LOCATION: 710 Rainier Avenue South SITE AREA: 32,884 Square Feet BUILDING AREA(gross): 5,700 Square Feet BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 3,600 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 s.f. single story.building and add a 3,600 s.f. service bay. An existing 900 s.f. service bay would be demolished and the resulting size of the proposed building area would be 8,400 square feet. Three new parking stalls would be added for a total of 20 parking spaces. The applicant seeks environmental review, site plan approval, and a variance from the Arterial Commercial zone which requires a minimum 15-foot landscaped strip along the street frontage. No landscaped strip would be provided, instead the applicant proposes that landscaping would be provided in two areas, one surrounding the pole sign on Rainier Avenue South, and another at the southwest corner of the parking lot. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of.the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlam Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • • • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS lil C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 1 rn ii, We have e this ap i ation with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whet i I/ a' s ee d t properly assess this proposal. / q 67. 5 .... Sign r o irector or Authorized Representative Date DEV P.DOC Rev.10/93 City anton Department of Planning/Building/F ., Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: JULY 15, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 02, 1996 APPLICANT: PAUL CASEY(ARCHITECT) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: LES SCHWAB ADDITION/REMODEL WORK ORDER NO: 78107 LOCATION: 710 Rainier Avenue South SITE AREA: 32,884 Square Feet BUILDING AREA(gross): 5,700 Square Feet BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 3,600 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 s.f. single story.building and add a 3,600 s.f. service bay. An existing 900 s.f. service bay would be demolished and the resulting size of the proposed building area would be 8,400 square feet. Three new parking stalls would be added for a total of 20 parking spaces. The applicant seeks environmental review, site plan approval, and a variance from the Arterial Commercial zone which requires a minimum 15-foot landscaped strip along the street frontage. No landscaped strip would be provided, instead the applicant proposes that landscaping would be provided in two areas, one surrounding the pole sign on Rainier Avenue South, and another at the southwest corner of the parking lot. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 Citeenton Department of Planning/Building s Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Tay Ks COMMENTS DUE: JULY 15, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 02, 1996 APPLICANT: PAUL CASEY(ARCHITECT) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING ' PROJECT TITLE:. LES SCHWAB ADDITION/REMODEL WORK ORDER NO: 78107 LOCATION: 710 Rainier Avenue South SITE AREA: 32,884 Square Feet BUILDING AREA(gross): 5,700 Square Feet BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 3,600 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 s.f. single story,building and add a 3,600 s.f. service bay. An existing 900 s.f. service bay would be demolished and the resulting size of the proposed building area would be 8,400 square feet. Three new parking stalls would be added for a total of 20 parking spaces. The applicant seeks environmental review, site plan approval, and a variance from the Arterial Commercial zone which requires a minimum 15-foot landscaped strip along the street frontage. No landscaped strip would be provided, instead the applicant proposes that landscaping would be provided in two areas, one surrounding the pole sign on Rainier Avenue South, and another at the southwest corner of the parking lot. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary . Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet .,-t4,/ B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 1- Z, ./( 6 "&2t r...2,160 . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 1740 /C� 4416 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio al information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ate DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 7 Ci enton Department of Planning/Building 41c Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PO t L GPi COMMENTS DUE: JULY 15, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 02, 1996 APPLICANT: PAUL CASEY(ARCHITECT) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: LES SCHWAB ADDITION/REMODEL WORK ORDER NO: 78107 LOCATION: 710 Rainier Avenue South SITE AREA: 32,884 Square Feet BUILDING AREA(gross): 5,700 Square Feet BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 3,600 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 s.f. single story.building and add a 3,600 s.f. service bay. An existing 900 s.f. service bay would be demolished and the resulting size of the proposed building area would be 8,400 square feet. Three new parking stalls would be added for a total of 20 parking spaces. The applicant seeks environmental review, site plan approval, and a variance from the Arterial Commercial zone which requires a minimum 15-foot landscaped strip along the street frontage. No landscaped strip would be provided! instead the applicant proposes that landscaping would be provided in two areas, one surrounding the pole sign on Rainier Avenue South, and another at the southwest corner of the parking lot. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information impacts impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation , Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet S64a 1(LVon0A gcL2 ?ol,NkCe_ eat ` se(IAc (th:L 6S-I-t racaqa D c xk tly - , pp\"oant 3\'o Ck KK4(1.c +11CLt Const c-h Df 5itPs ►n '-en-bn Cyr- #1 .rcd- -por burg 1&rl ) � YQ r\d O i sin. �- hL/� �< <CU r c cg �U s q- -I-c 6 s 0 3-ccu,re6( a -er hums I. on L eeKenaS I or It.04 of i1 19,e G-tD(Qn , B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. �J uia '7 ram` � Signature of Director or Aut�Re r�ative Date 9 P DEVAPP.DOC Rev,10/93 C. liw7N&; Cit enton Department of Planning/Building/I P Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Orly or"cutup ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENTSur COMMENTS DUE: JULY 15, 1996 771 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 02, 1996 JUL 0 7 120s APPLICANT: PAUL CASEY(ARCHITECT) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER IJ,�I,HENNING PROJECT TITLE: LES SCHWAB ADDITION/REMODEL WORK ORDER NO: 78107 LOCATION: 710 Rainier Avenue South SITE AREA: 32,884 Square Feet BUILDING AREA(gross): 5,700 Square Feet BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 3,600 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 s.f. single story.building and add a 3,600 s.f. service bay. An existing 900 s.f. service bay would be demolished and the resulting size of the proposed building area would be 8,400 square feet. Three new parking stalls would be added for a total of 20 parking spaces. The applicant seeks environmental review, site plan approval, and a variance from the Arterial Commercial zone which requires a minimum 15-foot landscaped strip along the street frontage. No landscaped strip would be provided, instead the applicant proposes that landscaping would be provided in two areas, one surrounding the pole sign on Rainier Avenue South, and another at the southwest corner of the parking lot. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS NO S os kr-i. t, 2 Gc- v4- C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to pro erly assess this proposal. 7/7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 9 P DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 Cito Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW—SIPE°fT REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Traces pz-14 Oa'J COMMENTS DUE: JULY 15, 1996 JUL 0 2 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 02, 1996 bult_u5810 ii VliSlON APPLICANT: PAUL CASEY(ARCHITECT) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: LES SCHWAB ADDITION/REMODEL WORK ORDER NO: 78107 LOCATION: 710 Rainier Avenue South SITE AREA: 32,884 Square Feet BUILDING AREA(gross): 5,700 Square Feet BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 3,600 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 s.f. single story building and add a 3,600 s.f. service bay. An existing 900 s.f. service bay would be demolished and the resulting size of the proposed building area would be 8,400 square feet. Three new parking stalls would be added for a total of 20 parking spaces. The applicant seeks environmental review, site plan approval, and a variance from the Arterial Commercial zone which requires a minimum 15-foot landscaped strip along the street frontage. No landscaped strip would be provided, instead the applicant proposes that landscaping would be provided in two areas, one surrounding the pole sign on Rainier Avenue South, and another at the southwest corner of the parking lot. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary • Earth Housing Air Aesthetics _ Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities ,� Animals Transportation tp' Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet ) 14,000 Feet AieLv Vek/elms �-i ,) ^f may- q ,�� y r� may. z�� �� p�v TT/ ' B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS --k-A-e/ C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to pr petty assess this proposal. eZ---;---KZT7? 1 - / / �^ 1 /�, /Y7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative,' ate DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 t'Llit415 Cittenton Department of Planning/Building 0 Works ' ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOP ENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Rim v IVIMENTS DUE: JULY 15, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 02, 1996 CifY OF RENTON APPLICANT: PAUL CASEY(ARCHITECT) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING -� PROJECT TITLE: LES SCHWAB ADDITION/REMODEL WORK ORDER NO: 78107 JUL: q LOCATION: 710 Rainier Avenue South ;,_a SITE AREA: 32,884 Square Feet BUILDING AREA(gross): 5,700 Square Feet BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 3,600 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 s.f. single story.building and add a 3,600 s.f. service bay. An existing 900 s.f. service bay would be demolished and the resulting size of the proposed building area would be 8,400 square feet. Three new parking stalls would be added for a total of 20 parking spaces. The applicant seeks environmental review, site plan approval, and a variance from the Arterial Commercial zone which requires a minimum 15-foot landscaped strip along the street frontage. No landscaped strip would be provided, instead the applicant proposes that landscaping would be provided in two areas, one surrounding the pole sign on Rainier Avenue South, and another at the southwest corner of the parking lot. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water �f Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet FO u_ tr y-a `S tr ezt a Dye. /6 o d 6 K t a-t C- Cos�-- -t��v,., o - .4 z j t'tic1tom, ?AY r i 3i5, ate, T •rE—F B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional i additional is needed to properly assess this proposal. �f 0.44, Signature of Director or Authorized Represent ' e Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 $ : - �r Ci en ton m epa - t of Planning/Building Works ENVIRONMEN AL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: f re e l-0d COMMENTS DUE: JULY 15, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 02, 1996 APPLICANT: PAUL CASEY(ARCHITECT) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: LES SCHWAB ADDITION/REMODEL WORK ORDER NO: 78107 LOCATION: 710 Rainier Avenue South SITE AREA: 32,884 Square Feet BUILDING AREA(gross): 5,700 Square Feet BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross):. 3,600 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 s.f. single story.building and add a 3,600 s.f. service bay. An existing 900 s.f. service bay would be demolished and the resulting size of the proposed building area would be 8,400 square feet. Three new parking stalls would be added for a total of 20 parking spaces. The applicant seeks environmental review, site plan approval, and a variance from the Arterial Commercial zone which requires a minimum 15-foot landscaped strip along the street frontage. No landscaped strip would be provided, instead the applicant proposes that landscaping would be provided in two areas, one surrounding the pole sign on Rainier Avenue South, and another at the southwest corner of the parking lot. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services ' Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet RENTON FIRE DEPT. ARE P F,VENT10N BUREAU JUL C 2 1 RECEP ED 04,4 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS .� JJ j cL a-7v( 5 l 96. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 4714f..--14/7.11177PLorAl -- g C Signature of Director or Authorized Represent give Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 • ti(°( o CITY OF RENTON. ,A ' FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 41- MEMORANDUM DATE: July 5, 1996 TO Jennifer Henning, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Code-Related Comments for Les Schwab ' 1 . The preliminary fire flow required'is 3,750 gpm. Four fire hydrants•are required: One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and three fire hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. It appears the existing , hydrants meet this requirement. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $0:52 per square foot of `increased area only: .2,700 square feet/ unit x . $0.52 = , $1,404. This fee-is payable at the time of building permit issuance: 3. Building shall comply with Article 81 of the Uniform Fire Code for high=piled. • combustible storage (tire storage area). This shall include the addition of smoke vents and a fire alarm system in the tire storage area. Ischwab.doc • /r i -� - - --- • .. . , , NO-71.<1 to ra PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: LES SCHWAB ADDITION/REMODEL I LUA-96.078,SA,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 sq.&single story building and add a 3,800 sq.R.service bay.An existing 900 se.lt.service bay would be demolished and the resulting size of the proposed i building area would be 8,400 sq.ft. Three new parking stalls would be added for a total of 20 parking spaces. The applicant seeks environmental review,site plan approval,and a variance from the Arterial Commercial zone which requires a minimum 1541.landscaped strip along the street frontage.No landscaped strip would be provided,Instead the applicant proposes that landscaping would be provided in two areas,one surrounding the pole sign on Rainier Avenue South,and another at the southwest corner of the parking lot. GENERAL LOCATION: 710 Rainier Avenue South PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit _Preliminary Plat _Short Plat • Conditional Use Permit _Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review _PemdtShoreline Conditional Use XXXX VARIANCE , _Fill&Grade Permit _Shoreline Substantial _Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed In the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative site • plan approval.Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's"Notice of Application'publication In the Valley Daily News. For further Information on the application,or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental i determinations,appeal'periods and/or the public heating date(s)for this project,please contact the Development Services Division at 235.2550. __-.r.—` —'�-tm:axt=firm-• _.�:_.��L. ' •r nrl�d LC1. r �FTF(n[it• t r� .0�, r . • • W �s • • u,, �MMIFM • „„lit€Ai W 4. e Z 'PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. ' CERTIFICATION I. rS d,O LJG- o'h , hereby certify that copies of the above document we,re poste&by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on 11 i1Ali j 5, 1 q1(4 In • Signed: .1D1L)'VNY1 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . ) SS • COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Ski b Y -�f�-Gionl. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act,f?r.,th uses •and purposes mentioned in the instrume ti?`: '� . Dated: , ,,, .a i a C'�, v / l/� -� , ,, Note ublic i a d for the State• of_Was..ington • Notary (Print) ��-/-�6--A-/'N , �:t ��0� ` My appointment expires: (p • 7 I -„,IQ r • NOTARY.DOC ( , .,, . '', INOIrliQE PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: LES SCHWAB ADDITION/REMODEL/LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 sq.ft.single story building and add ' a 3,600 sq.ft.service bay. An existing 900 sq.ft.service bay would be demolished and the resulting size of the proposed building area would be 8,400 sq. ft. Three new parking stalls would be added for a total of 20 parking spaces. The applicant seeks environmental review, site plan approval, and a variance from the Arterial Commercial zone which requires a minimum 15-ft.landscaped strip along the street frontage. No landscaped strip would be provided,instead the applicant proposes that landscaping would be provided in two areas, one surrounding the pole sign on Rainier Avenue South,and another at the southwest corner of the parking lot. GENERAL LOCATION: 710 Rainier Avenue South PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat Conditional Use Permit Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use XXXX VARIANCE Permit Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. 'Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's"Notice of Application" publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. • • P .' '•..I 'I .._tJ;�-• ri, • "' a 41 EJ'�6i1► I -/i-{- n' I 6 u —es__ r 1J -I � 7� u.- .. ri P.Ir \ VIG Oq . 1+! • ;ma W., -M i Q ,4 aT us tor. i 84 r-; • K, N x l• . =y 1 .• • / .i • ��r g u,m ,t•, INC a.o NpgtHE. / • M .. _ ._ • ,o, { , 1 G .1 11O le. I �i' I `f� 1\i ;:z�;.. .+u i� s � 7T �� ii •11d 01 i i 1(1, i'1 a• j16 sI. i ! 10I�M17` lc°'. 1 'L ' �,'Io,r,I�`_._F_��' :tI• a uW • i -'y r • 1 11 1 . Y' N.6 M LJ�Id—Sit i 1 _ .v... $ J • I:PLEA E:S .NCLsUDE'THEPRQJECFNUMBER':WHENCpI'SINGFQR`.FRQRER'.FII:E;IDENTIFICATION`'>`:;';`I NOTICE OF F4cOPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Approval (SA), Variance (V), and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: LES SCHWAB ADDITION/REMODEL; LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to remodel an existing 5,700 sq.ft. single story building and add a 3,600 sq.ft. service bay. An existing 900 sq.ft. service bay would be demolished and the resulting size of the proposed building area would be 8,400 sq. ft. Three new parking stalls would be added for a total of 20 parking spaces. The applicant seeks environmental review, site plan approval, and a variance from the Arterial Commercial zone which requires a minimum 15-ft. landscaped strip along the street frontage. No landscaped strip would be provided, instead the applicant proposes that landscaping would be provided in two areas, one surrounding the pole sign on Rainier Avenue South, and another at the southwest corner of the parking lot. GENERAL LOCATION: 710 Rainier Avenue South PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Variance Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing - date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. _b..;� �,i_._ ._ �4. 17TH-_—ST— -�. a. ---- _•1 • I .4-5.=7 .._ ito tv- ttkl6 _ -. za . .. a . ...) - • —� tse.9L r -u7.5 ' it 41 6' . _ --_ ---§ • =111 -- - ,- I I r.1.19 i L. S10flf°—I N:. �y9 }WirerG I I 0 . RC�T 1 r.cas x _ CC (— : Irs co N i s. " 4 ;SG ec. �Tt.I7- :.t• t l,,l UR e I _ °6 Y Q ` • L 3.O Ac. cd • I a ~ �4 G It Z L.1t W M ��t�t °� u.3z ;: : 'V •d .si ' • ;. Bu1`1NLTON • „o ,� a45.D CO RIGHT QF wAY• S. r G�� TL.29 50 4 o I• - $ P f `� 16T• • r�, I P.s• 1NOY1 , _,J-r' o I -,, 1�s. �3 , , ti 'I I �• D�' I 1 I g0 III ) 14Ap7 i I • Y F SF.100' , Q ':• ,,y+ I 15o • i•.-.i I D _M. to „5�a dl " IP HeAt tPS l•tt.n1C. I I 1 N�7 ,7 • •• ::::::I '�A� , 15953 137: ____ ----n_.._.. Ii 1�C,.I 1 1 N 14" NOLIDP� I _ H^(OiteRA1 I- _;�. IQ s 1 E ::;�•:,'. M N I H 1 c `OI 1 i ' I I1Z_ GENA . 1, 11•19 9 ` -LI I .. ::: =`'_�-� m I • 1 I - Y'1';' VADA.7ED... _ VAC A76D I I yyf���� u�I1 1� I L Im -51�Q�4In1u :•:.=:,ti -r -�-1"T 1� . 1�II '[-^�-_jr�-_ -rt---- I'.I]7IA l9* 1/ ; la41?i5 Ipl I'F�ul�. ,. T.11. -iT I1 1 I 17,1 I-•N._ 1 ;:, -----�- ,,n F• \, I 1 I l • • MR. THOMAS WOLTER • 8820 S 134th ST #A REN'I'ON, WA 98055 • ( 182305-9022-03 ( • MR. FRED KNACK• ( • 750 RAINIER AVE. S. • • RENTON, WA 98055 192305-9063 02 f'r•• SFP-A LIMIT ED PA RTNERSHIP ERSH IP P O BOX 66 754 R 7 PRINEVILLE, LLE O 9.�yy P I 1 • ' ii 1. :� ('�•,' 44- 6 1 2305 9 0 0 MR. KEITH HA • RNISH . • P.O. BOX 6006 • .r 1 21, M 9 DEARBORN0 3 I48 ' MR•. JACK CURRAN K.- 10700 MERIDIAN AVE. N #505 SEATTLE, WA 98133 • 182305-9123-01 (', MR. VICTOR DIAMBRI �.` . " •• 1 61 5 SHATTUCK AVE. S. RENTON, WA 98055 (•.: 192305-9053-04 „,r CURRAN FAMILY LIMITED PA i.. : 10700 MERIDIAN AVE. N. • #505 SEATTLE, WA 98133 VE 1 82305-921 1 -04 • • •• ( MS. GLADYS PIEROTTI 17034 SE 184th ST • RENTON, WA 98058 ( 192305-9027-07 ' SOUND FORD INC. 750 RAINIER AVE. S- RENTON, WA 980• 55 192305-9035-07 CITY JF RENTON NAL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor. . Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • July 2, 1996 • Mr. Paul Casey, A.IA The Casey Group Architects . '10116-36th Ave;•Ct:SW Suite#109 • Tacoma,"WA 98499 • SUBJECT: .' : Les Schwab Addition/Remodel . Project No; LUA-96-078,SA,V,ECF • Dear Mr..Casey:. . The Development Planning •Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according,to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. • It is tentatively•schedufed for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on*. - July 23, 1996. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is • required to continue processing your application for environmental review. Please contact me, at 277-6186, if you have any questions. Sincerel4 .)13, • oth Henning Project Manager ACCPTLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ighThic nanar rnntainc FO%rarvdad matarial 9F%nnct rnncnmar J U H — 1 S — 9 E. T U E 1'5 : •1 9 THE C Pi S E Y GROUP P _ ID 2 ) a u.L Y. :• fr4. :.t. c(' £t 4� i• ai :. ::.! J r:i24 �ryili: rr n ;:,S''..•:: :}.a%•^• 'a•x„ N: . og.}s..•.'4y}: i?Z :, , : ;b .c . ;y ,3 :i e ns X. • L cy�;•':k.r ,{ l; e:(,riYY' „?�J ':v •ti•nSi�f : Cr ,.wa ,}L4 Ce,:,i} qAn � A ' A` 'x 5 i ' 4 `f. 14 ,. kiini Y .{ •::•,u.•.Gt r i•x . ' S u .•. <.} � ! ' r:. bs 'L: :,r.,•�a 'J + r , .x.. . }. r: s !„..�ya° ,.,� n% .t >.,;:•{. :L ! tt :. • { D. EtO1ENT'S�F1llG�S� Dl1I Sl� ".i : � .: r :< 1'f .C.. ) ; ,ZV.tiS 4 :�:SasH:f f . > , k, 4,,,4, \ , : . . . < +ii C} ! a :", .< >: :. i.:,:> : , '4:cS' 4�Yfi.i} �M1>. s. ; :' v4+'�" 4Y : Y : ' S �% <�' 1 ?ii ' a% , • .lJ. r▪.a•, n .�} o ': 5\ :`irr, Si }, ,i +.:':.'v, ;: y:}5y :+. r : :r:YAs.y.At 4 •9..v ,!. Sv SJ.:4} {r. %)'. n}•r!!:4.•2.•y:rL. . r.:.}» � , :};,<•:•s r▪ .:.... •, ^ , i: } . 'lw 7ii iti,k,• >t ! ..r rmsip LY: � '• „ :n £'6r4�. " :R '� • 4 , , 9 „ v , , r , ; S rii %.�y:�: 4{ . S . • • r % % {( e�: )\ . 4 :4r ::,: 2atR. ; �4K} L oe4< Yx , ia ' yA ' • :r, {�� v1 . t \ {pie �ia:':k<a :�▪ : i.i ! rif: J :iSn•YC.•.i "\: .�.iY• vi,J.,ve. r a S�y X+1' > u � i iL r •tY i:t r : s 'v ` ll`` R! +4ivv , i �▪: r. ^ L " S3 ' s.�•4f.': ' r S {' ; :'. f iii ... . {y y f .hAr° •.. ,.ix...'>..v:.tA•.i`iJ.+ r.„r 4• 1uy, ..N,:N n .,..:..} :."J i4: : .r:..,:,•a,,+. v.v+r..:v.:• iu.i\,;..,,,,.•{;{l.YifY\%<}..,:!•.+C.!PK' . i4i•r�4v•,I...:\ J ':\ r1r , ' 1 ! ,..;.: :}r r :.x :vi:r :•r;K ,i• :,�;.�....!:r;.•r :xsxy..ia::v4.n•:ix ko .:l•r •.;•};• •{% :: !!9Y•y'•; :•:tiffs �:;:..5+ f t:s;"`'..� „ ri4'+rV:•Y4s••.t•}}.:. s:c : .!'.V'.'+ ;•Q• :i• < e ,5 `•arx '•RL �• � yjii is%: �+ q Y:` n'�iS 1 14�p• Z 4.s: �� {V 0 :': LReY y �T` .,�. .�i fin{ S1 •;4$::}`^$:::4.�;{..r.�\. ".. .. ,r v!llit•'i'i• .:rrt.i){:�. ,\"i�'{{:.>'.e: .f'li^:r rvy�:n f:i��•.r:';:�`•S:'.i\•'•.'•�'•:i�F::`i\:St::.n..:• S":�ti,::."� .. ... "•%^:i7i:,,: •I rr •4,4•''•9'•r0 r'y:/:$..r.?>r ,.yS::.�'44:r{i}}S,l:}<LS:. r ... .r...y`• g!ii '1:.,,\>... 1% JY,!}„rl,�.Ji:S.\', w:Ya,..iY. r'.T4:.<.Yt:i`.{:•S.:'r).r'.i!v.k5:'y:i:: ,{:.::. ''m{y<..) " ; . '"'.fix: •Flp�ke i ;r: ;a:!:::r:; r:'s EXISTING LAND USE(S)• ';(10tA T�t!':�N1aSC6 '/� tt}GfS:•Fd'tt'»'�Ch;�1Wh�'r•;,, ,...r..,.+......+..`.•".. .':'�.^ - NAME: ` r Auto Supplies & Service • • PROPOSED LAND USES: ADDRESS: • • Lo�� i� `7 eitt,O Same • • &D;) r ZIP: . �Fr ^ n �� EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: L7 l , _ ` ' TELEPHONE NUMBER: Employment area - Commercial • ' • '' l -' 4t"�''2 - vC l 1 ' PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP 92IGNATION; Same NAME; Mr. Paul 3. Casey A.I.A. The Casey Group Architects EXISTING ZONING: • Commercial Arterial (CA) • • ADDRESS:10116 36th Ave.. Ct. 'SW . Suite 1 09 PROPOSED ZONING: • CITY: Tacoma, WA ZIP: 98499 Same • SITE AREA(SO. FT. OR ACREAGE): TELEPHONE • ( 2,06) 584-5207 NUMBER: + •Fax (206) 581 -9720 32, 884 s.f, • i ,y:!:,^iai sw x'.;ga;K: .,.i a �• r: ' r '.x•w:K4}y.r}e::•^!,,,, fir:z <h^••,�,,,,.,,,,Z.r,: ti:< ::: PROJECT VALUE: rr{•.i;i;,.sSXi!r '.}';}` i..e4.4%•ai•,};'4;..? ... ,, 4fK s f' aa;Y', x oiF;<:i k ¢. •i^x3.4:;,<uti:•i%:ii?>rr..:.., :i..tx..,f .i•i i�9• tr• : 5•< ' exa>:.. ..., t $200, 000 .00 PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME; Addition to & remodeling of the Les IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? O Schwab, Tie°uCenter • • • PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ' No • •770 Rainier Ave. S. • IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY • • SENSITIVE AREA? a KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): None known RECEIVED 192 305 9044 J N 2 4 1996 . DEVELOPMENT PLANNING r . L\i1Y�F FtCNTOfd •: r 1 -• U N — 1 S — 9 E T U E 1 S : 2 1 THE C A S E Y G R O U P P _ 0 3 .:::. r:..n•v} :.;:.../,.A•:. :,},.. ./,.;1.� ,:.V;:, ,::,....t.: :,. ,:>.. ..,t.,..••a..:},,.,..}::„.:.' t :•�:i::v, ...;`;:as.:�`ii4£',4,:iv:::r':$CS^.;;(.:� ,•4•, •:rxt r,•: „r r tir. , r.ht� ,� •', �>s•�\}••''<.,,,_. ,t,:< 4.::{ E'GAl.: b nnI :lb:...?•:.� PROP •R'T'Y 'Attaci' `•••••a p}e,.sne"et',:I•:t� ' ,5.5> C.,1:>•va- ,,::.,t `•!:SYf :.:.......:�j:. ..T.,,.,.. \.:\ :, ,......��'�:!,:�MI,.,.. ,... ••.�.:.:.<,.. .. ... `.�,.,.:•.:.•. •,....••R'�+i. M., �SA;1.,.•.(•r.�.• .,.:..,•,,, ,..!Q�a.: ..,... ,.�.v1',.,.3,�"t.:�.:,5r`.Jx.•...::.::., See attached • {M1 F i : t , i'S : .r, rn4yYi1is :i<:•ti:x•:: 'vs :�\ 1^ :. , ' �( . X :•} . i ;` ,r+i.. x :r ri1': 1r : • r < . ,r. :N , ' is iyi�'>.` i[>filia %}tC`:� ii3 .r J;•, iY<iiv:{:i ,LL.v...Y:LKJiv.r• i'. I. .nt• ' ttfi'' `�•' t' t l�°:� t � :.4Y.,t:.}<.�;"� .,...:.::a!tx'k<�r;�:s:.r.. ,. :::�::G..,�.:,n1S:,..,).,,,.�'j?p�,.�...,., �.,4.,�P:.:, . .,�`P•P�•� .,,.: .. , ,: ,:;:�!)�•;�,,w,.+,.: I�.,.,�Y,,.� .r. ..�x� : .� ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ __REZONE $ • _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT t • SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ ^TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _ _ — TENTATIVE PLAT $ . _ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT S _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ - _x SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ 1 , 000 _ FINAL PLAT GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ ' (NO. CU. YDS: 1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ _X VARIANCE Front landscaping$• 250 (FROM SECTION; ) PRELIMINARY — _WAIVER $ FINAL ' WETLAND PERMIT $ • _ ROUTINE VEGETATION • MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ BINDING SITE PLAN $� _. SHORELINE REVIEWS: _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $,,, • CONDITIONAL USE . $ — VARIANCE $ " 0 . . . • __ EXEMPTION SNo Chargq ,g ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW '$ 500 r— REVISION $ tt; •., .V•x4'•.ii•. :;,ti•• tact '°iv° 'F� x :7 :•.•<.•)• ,r is }•1••S ,...:••.:.,:oh..`.:t. ,: ...•.,.,•7:a ri:..:..,>:. ..YY:;.?:::.....fr•.r.:,••:.,,..,:4: ..;.."': vtty r• n ..,t,,. ,..t.�. i.C .i t'•r.•:, .ri'sC%4. °.f:.f:.} }r i=rR'S:+'%•:14K}iaY'};M:>:: }:}`�}}..S. .a. ..k:: .f••^�•)..rYw: :ta•:, +".r•n•;. ;•: : .Fr• ,:JrP }`�: ':i°;"� ..x }<:::.� ;'} .<r.:: ,..:. :y:.. ,:; 'D' T�O'Frr45:1111N� fiSFi1P>...::,>:N:.:<:<>��. :::::::. i.:,.. ...1 :•..:.:.,:• :..: {:,+,.:r+,`:}:te\ :1..,. :.,:•h.t ., ..:..... .................\.,.., .r ...+.<:.u.n...u..u.i:. .:..,..,..:. ,,..,... ..,.\:.i7C.wu:5.� : ..u,�j.f+,:!..uuu.}.,..+r..,..u•..w1...,SSi:K.. I, (Print Name Ias n.•'ek►AA.c.(t declare that I am(please check ono)_the owner of the property involved in this application.t authorized represent ive to act for the property owner(please at;ech proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements end answers herein conteinad and the Information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the beat of my knowledge and belief. • yy� '_y/•�'�. - [�!� ATTEST: Subscri ed and sworn to before me, a Notary Publio,in and I I 4(-t I l9 N\IVA-C" '_--'"Al'f�'.a'211 ;'.rea'S4,- ,.�• �t•'+i' of 1.. . residing at i, .Yrr OI'FICIAL SEAL ri rle. r I on the 19-day of (Name o Owner/Representative) t ,i, . ti • --,, iVIAFtVL COS ei (IPg ? NOTARY PUBLIC- • ' • ) ti t�. .... �iK1/4:3 COMMISSION NO. 0490 • MY cOMMIBM(0)row ill (Signal © of Owner/Representati : ,:..:>_;;._::_:r.�,:.,;:.�, , y� (Signatur• of No y ublic) x<•:, •:: ,,,:;:}:::... :.......::.....:5:r,!•i.".:K;x:::s w..;ti•:,:;}..Y.ra:^id :.,}:.: tic, '^t:• :.fir :!• .S+ ?..7 }rxh..... f': �1i4.'•,�ai;•.°ri%S`:SS.pi.... ..:aw::a:,, i::t.a: Y•.. .?:.is:: `'!:/•'' ..<.. • .'j, py� r} j;a' S:J.i. :Y:i 4' :.�S.�Gi1 • y \.9�`i>i::.:r,:•>i`:+=:`?•r:, k y.•^4p:s4 a.ty,:. ..uy.r.,: .Y::ia..' I` ...a k,. •'I�MI.. .!I�\ ��.:tf:T<....t.C:. ..i:>>.. r.:4':.5:•,';r: 2:::i. ."T• M �< }•t::. a•,:;•:.:•,^Yr :.a ^p;'V' }K:?4r. .•i•i:: }�•�:Y:• rT0 L tlr:,:• A e a.t :.Yvan�.4TA..}:F. ti4>!; ':A•i a�: N.•x,h :.h:•n«•:'•i`Y�r.•Y..: x4.4 REVISED 2/96 • , • , J • LEGAL IMECR:117'011- THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION WHICH BEARS NORTH 89'50'24" WEST 2008.4 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF± THENCE SOUTH 0'09'36" WEST 30 FEET TO THE SOUTH MARGIN OF SOUTH ith STREET (SOUTHEAST 144th STREET)± THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID MARGIN ON A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 319.34 FEET THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 26'48'35" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 111.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION± THENCE CONTINUING ON SAID CURVE ALONG SAID STREET MARGIN AND ALONG THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 21'49'42" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 144.52 FEET± THENCE SOUTH 41'25'36" WEST, 123.31' FEET± THENCE SOUTH 55'41'30" EAST 235.44 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 0'09'36" WEST 312.98 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. • THENCE NORTH 0'09'36" EAST, 312.98 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. AREA = 32,884sq.Ft. = 0.1545 acres RECEIVED • 2 4 1996 pE`�ELOPENT PLANNING CITY OF ReNTON Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND • 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Addition to and remodel of the Les Schwab Tire Center, Renton, Wa. 2. Name of applicant: The Casey Group Architects Paul J. Casey A.I.A. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 10116 36th Ave. Ct. SW. , Suite 109 Tacoma, WA 98499 • Paul J. Casey . ( 206) 584-5207 4. Date checklist prepared: 6/18/96 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton • 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Early 1997, one phase 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been.prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None known , 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly.affecting`the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Concurrent front landscape variance and site plan approval applications. ' 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Typical building and site development permits. • 11. Give brief, complete description of your.proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Demolition of a 900 s.f. portion of the existing building, remodeling of a portion of the existing building, construction of a 3,600 s.f. addition to the existing building, and the addition of land - e A portion of the site currently covered with a gravel surface will be paved. JUG, 2 4 1996 • 2 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING , c,T:,d 'PENTON • Environmental Checklist • • � J 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site-plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project site is at 710 Rainier Ave. S. , King County Parcel Number is 192-305-9044 • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS • EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one •rolli) ng,•hilly,..stee .slo es mountainous,P P other • • b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 1 — 2% • c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, p sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Unknown • • d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, ' describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of anyfillingor grading In proposed. Indicate source of fill. g g Minimal given site is relatively flat and is already developed. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Minimal g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 90% — 95%. Site is now completely covered with buildings, • :. . • paved or gravel surfaces . 35 Environmental Checklist • h. • Proposed measures to P reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, :odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If .any,'generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Typical. long term vehicle and short` term construction equipment exhaust and short term dust from construction b. aA4hvehtaneysoff-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Adjacent street vehicle exhaust. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None . 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,•wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. • I . No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No • 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general • description,P � and approximate quantities if known. No 5) • Does the proposal lie within a 100-year P 0 year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No • II. 4' Environmental Checklist 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No • b. Ground Water: 1) Will.ground water be.withdrawn,.or will water be discharged to ground water? Give . general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for.example. Domestic sewage;.;industrial, containing•the.following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general.size•of•the system;the'number of such systems, the. number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff(including storm water): • • • 1) • Describe.the .source of runoff. (including storm'water) .and,.method• of.collection 'and • •disposal, if any (include quantities,-if known).'-Where will this water flow? .Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Runoff from roof and pavement to be collected by drains and catch b sins which will be connected to the existing storm sewer at the project frontage. 2) . Could waste material enter ground or surface waters?..If so,.generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None . 4. PLANTS No existing planting. . a. . Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: . deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs . • grass pasture crop or grain - • wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other' water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NSA Environmental Checklist C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None observed • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: New urban type landscaping to be added at the southeast corner of the site and around the existing project pole sign. 5. ANIMALS a. :Circle any birds and animals which have been observed.on-or.near the.site or•are known to be on or near the site: (see next page) None observed • • Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other - . b. • List any threatened or endangered species known to be.on or near the site. • None observed c. Is the site part of a.migration route? If so, explain No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None • • 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric lighting and equipment, electric heating and/or natural gas heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. • No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Addition construction to State Energy Code Standards. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH • • • Environmental Checklist a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None beyond existing use. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be.required. Typical fire, police and paramedic services for auto service/retail functions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Service bay drains connected to oil/water separator. b. Noise 1) •What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,• equipment, operation, other)? Traffic 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example:..traffic„construction, •operation; other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Typical construction and vehicle related noise during business hours of 7 AM —. 6 PM. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None • 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Auto service/retail and commercial. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not in recent history. c. Describe any structures on the site. .. 5,700 s.f. building. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?• • . • Yes, 900 s.f. service bays. • , e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? • . Commercial arterial (CA) f. What is the.current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Employment area — commercial (EAC) • 7 Environmental Checklist • g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No -Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 6 — 10 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid•or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible_with existing:and projected land uses and plans, if any: None 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be.provided, if any? Indicate whether high, • middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None • • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housingimpacts,p acts, if any: None • 10. AESTHETICS • • a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 22' , painted concrete block and metal panels. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or.obstructed? • None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Design per typical commercial/auto service function standards. • • • Environmental Checklist 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Vehicle headlights, evening/night time. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? None beyond existing conditions. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None • 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediatevicinity? None • • b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No • • • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on.recreation, including•recreation • opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None . 13. HISTORIC,AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known b. • Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or •• cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None observed c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: . None 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. . Rainier Ave. S. & SW 7th Street. Existing access points onto • Rainier to remain. 9 • Environmental Checklist b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Along Rainier c. • How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 20, none eliminated d. • -Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,•or.improvements.to.existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe.(indicate whether.public or private? No • • e. Will the project use (or' occur in 'the immediate „vicinityo•� t) water,:::rail, or air transportation? If so, generally,describe. No • • f. How manyvehicular'tri sper da would•be,generated b the completed.project? If P Y•� 9 Y P P 1 known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See submitted letter from; Traffic Engineer. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None • 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes, typical for auto service retail. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Increase in property tax base and payment of required fees. 16. UTILITIES ' a. Circle " . rrentl _walla le at the site. electricity natural ga•.1 efuse service, telephon sanitary sewer, eptic system, of er. • • • ' 4 Environmental Checklist b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, • and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Existing utility connections to be utilized. I . C. SIGNATURE .1, .the:undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge.the above information is true and • complete. It 'is.understood that the lead agency may ..withdraw any declaration of non- • significance that it might.issue in reliance upon this checklist .should there be any willful misrepresent ' willful lack of full disclosure on my part. • Proponent: • Name Printed: ., Paul J. Casey A.I.A. Date: 6/19/96 ' . • • I. . • • • • • 11 • VARIANCE NARRATIVE We are requesting a Variance from ORD.4449,5-23-94 which requires a landscaping strip of at least 15' along the street frontage. The reason that the Variance is required at this time is to allow an existing non- landscaped street frontage condition to continue as part of the current building expansion. The current building expansion consists of a 3,510 s.f. addition to the south side of the existing Les Schwab Tire Center. (A 900 s.f. portion of the building will be demolished to allow the addition). The existing tire center has been in place for many years and has already lost space for parking in front of the store due to earlier widening of Rainier Avenue S. The remaining narrow space in front of the existing tire center is used as a drive aisle that connects the southern and northern existing parking areas and driveway access points onto Rainier Avenue. If this drive aisle was landscaped as required by the Zoning Code, the front on site connection between the above listed parking areas and access points would be lost. If this would happen, on site vehicle circulation would be forced to enter and exit Rainier Avenue, which adds additional traffic congestion, or go through the rear gated storage areas in order to access different areas of the site. The proposed building addition does not effect or limit the existing on site vehicular circulation. The required front landscaping has been added around the existing pole signage, so the Variance request to the 15' front landscape requirement is for the area in front of the existing building. The reason this Variance request is justifiable is as follows: A. The applicant will suffer undue hardship if the Variance request is denied because the front on site inter-connecting driveway will be lost. This • driveway connection is required for the owner to enjoy a substantial property right possessed by a majority of area landowners. (I.e. the provision of reasonable on site circulation space to accommodate the existing use of the site). In addition, the small size and triangular shape of the property, combined with access from only one side of property limits design options for the property owner. Strict application of the Zoning Code Standards, which requires the front landscaping, will deprive this landowner from continuing use of this property to the same level, because the on-site circulation will be severely limited. RECEIVED Page 1 notes/96/149varnc JUN 2 4 '1996 • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON This potential lack of circulation restricts the current level of commerce enjoyed by the property owner and other property owners in the vicinity. Again, please note that the narrow drive in front of the existing tire center was not created by the property owner but by previous widening of Rainier Avenue. B. Granting this Variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity because the site is currently developed in the area of the Variance request and the proposed development does not make the current condition any worse. In fact, the owner is improving the general appearance of the street frontage by adding landscaping around the existing pole sign to the north. C. Granting this Variance will not constitute any special privilege for this landowner because the Variance will only allow the continued use of the property to the same level as adjacent landowners. Again, the small size and triangular shape of the property combined with the existing building location and access from only one side severely limit the planning options of the owner. All these conditions do not appear to exist elsewhere in the vicinity. D. The requested Variance is the minimum Variance required to allow the property owner continued use of the property to current levels. Other known parking, landscape, building design requirements have been met. • RENTON LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER 6/21/96 Site Plan Review Project Narrative The project site is 32,844 s.f. and is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Rainier Avenue South and SW 7th Street. The site is currently occupied by a 5,700 s.f. single story Les Schwab Tire Center. The existing building is concrete block with a wood fascia and is painted with Les Schwab's standard red and white paint scheme. The site is relatively flat and is presently paved with a combination of concrete, asphalt, and gravel surfaces. The proposed development consists of a partial remodel of the existing structure, demolition of a 900 s.f. service bay and an addition of a 3,600 s.f. service/alignment bay space. The enclosed area of the completed building will be 8,400 s.f. The new addition will be a combination of concrete block and painted metal siding with a steel framed interior. Seventeen parking stalls currently exist which will be reconfigured to provide 20 parking stalls when the project is completed. Landscaped areas will be added at the existing free standing sign located along Rainier Avenue and at the south east corner of the site. The site is currently served by three access points which will remain. ;a 2 ¢ 1996 DE Pr t: T PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Notes/96/149 rev iw RENTON LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER 6/21/96 Construction Mitigation Description The proposed construction start is scheduled early in 1997 and the construction period is expected to last two to three months. During this period, construction activities between 7 AM and 5 PM are anticipated to occur. The anticipated transportation/hauling route is Rainier Avenue S., to Interstate 405 or Route 167. Construction mitigation measures would be dust control as required and mud control at the site access points. RECEIVED JUN 2 44 1996 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON 06/24/96 10:06 FAX 206 454 0220 ENTRANCO ENG. [2002/005 . 41310 ENTRANCO June 24, 1996 Mr. Paul Casey The Casey Group 10116 36th Avenue Ct. SW, Suite 109 • • Tacoma, Washington 98409 I ' Re Trip Generation Study Les Schwab- Renton, Washington Entranco Project No. 96809-06 10900 NE 8 T H ST Dear Mr. Casey: • SUITE 1 0 0 This letter documents the trip generation for the proposed Les Schwab expansion in Renton, B e L 1 E Y u E Washington. The existing Les Schwab currently has four service bays and is located on the southeast corner of the Rainier Avenue South/South 7th Street intersection (see attached site WASHINGTON plan). Access is provided by three right-in right-out only driveways along Rainier Avenue South. The proposed expansion will provide two additional service bays resulting in a total of 9 8 0 0 4 six service bays. The access to the site will remain as it currently exists. Typically, the ITE Trip Generation Manual would be used to determine the daily trip generation TELEPHONE associated with the two additional service bays. However, for this specific land use, no 206 information was available on daily trip generation. Therefore, a daily trip generation rate was 454 5 6 0 0 estimated based on a manual traffic count at the existing store. A manual traffic count of the vehicles entering and exiting the site was conducted on Thursday TOLL FREE June 20, 1996. The traffic counts were conducted between 6:30 a.m. and 7:30 p.m., an hour 8 o 0 and a half before opening and after closing, to account for customers picking up and dropping off their vehicles and employees coming and leaving the site (see attached counts). 454 5601 Based on the traffic counts, the existing Les Schwab Store generated 280 daily trips (140 inbound, 140 outbound). Therefore, based on four existing service bays (4 bays) the daily trip FAX generation rate was estimated to be 70 daily trips per service bay. Applying the trip generation 206 rate of 70 daily trips per service bay, it is expected the addition of two service bays will 454 02 o increase the daily traffic from Les Schwab to 420 trips. The trip generation for the existing site and the proposed expansion is shown in table 1. Table 1 • Trip Generation Summary • Les Schwab Tire Center-Renton • Daily Trips per Service Hay Daily Trips Service Land Use Bays In Out Total In Out Total With Expansion 6 35 35 70 210 210 -.420 A ONA N A Less Existing Store 4 35 35 70 140 140 280 Less 10% Passby \PCFIPAHO .� En 21 21 42 q f�C WASHINGTON ,t LNthNING 4 l9BU Net New Trips = 49 49 98 pEVEIOFPflct$ TP .•rrY OF Re NTON 06/24/96 10:06 FAX 206 454 0220 ENTRANCO ENG. 2 003/005 . Mr. Paul Casey June 24, 1996 Page2 Passby trips are defined as trips made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination. Based on the characteristics of the land use, the percentage of gross trips classified as passby for the Les Schwab store was determined to be 10 percent. Therefore, it is expected the total net new daily trips to the existing roadway network due to the two service bays is 98 trips (49 inbound, 49 outbound). Please call me at 454-5600 if you have any questions. Sincerely, • ENTRANCO a1'0, o,s%ash,/M Ken Oswell, P.E. Project Manager-Traffic - A3e .tro KOO:jc `w.TO ,CBE 2 lSTE4O e EXPIRES - c} • • I ' 2 _ I 06/24/96 10:07 FAX 206 454 0220 ENTRANCO ENG. el 004/005 .., 1 . 4..TUN — - 96 FRI e ,; 8 THE CASEY CROI. P . la 2 . • ' s 1 • • I . I I . I • ...,,.,..1.i.•V40 .• 1 • ..2:':- -7..—.:,1:41 ; .•ii al .•/ /1 /1.:'Zt.l',...,:..7..-•r.li 2.7- / / • i '' /' / .• • / .4.A::•77-11:-...7": ". 0% .1 e.•' .4.------ / 1 ," ,11 co por AN i•.•-..141 / ..... ./. I I' ..,f,/. 1 we-- ,----- . ' e .1 '• ."0•• .... , • • • , / •7 .0° /0"----' . • ./' .....• / ''...... • . q I ..., ./ . .1 ./ /, • ,, , •4 ..,... t, aid ' .1' • ..'I' • ,,;'''' ,i. -. 1.:;:f.. .. . . .•-•".../".'' _, ...• ,... ,? i lix ,' ,• - '.. 2•,/.,....:7;:•::..._....r,„,&a:L......--- .... / , a.• , , ell\, .0' , jir .'" .P.: /- 1._.•••..Y.'4%.:... ....e.. 1* e,.. I .0. 11,,• e'0 )t.'...,::•;„,;::::::i00.:„,,z; ARCA•1.14 C:::: / / tr• .0' /' / Vi ' ' ';'•:•:•74.:&•::::::: • paa 1 r "•::•:,:::•:%•:•:: s i 4, 4.c.- ./ •i i / •'I / ,•• / i. if is , 1 ,• ., ter .• i•ir •• .:-. e' ,0 •• •:, •• , ;* ' e. ; ' • .../ ,. , ., 4,'.. a, e ExIbT11,4 'D. 4310611LT--). lor ,• .1 / / / .%,a, • P.1 dkr--'• e i ...• i / ,. .,,, ...,,:- ,,,,t. ND. 1 • • • / e .., . al '1 .I., % / 0 •as. • 1# r". .1. r'' 4,I .• - / N'N. 4* r , .r. 4 • 4.7 i 4`.. . .g. i 0' e I.''' °-' s••• 1 e' .0 Ls• • ..... •••••. / wen.al•xdot . ; ./•' / • / ''',./ •• i'V 1 .• ,•. • JO ft, 00. ,, / 's•, '.,,•';.s i ..• e ui_, ...ui •e. / =num ran ... . / •7 :.e. 1 if- • ,,,...',,1 . 1.. A.4. ,.' „N. • '4'1.1. .10. * 14 '40":: iig 4.,,,,.. „ .:5,,,.„. e•. :4(1 ',., , \ —.......... ,..741s, :1. ' 1 . e' $ ..a. i.,.,4.4.,„ .• s,. ..... I •I...'4t' ' '...'N( 1 / ..4'.... •,T1 '\ ''''.t`...14... \•• C..ledN. '...' • I.,• s,. k; ...;;;;.t,. . ,.....' F 1 t•. 'N. ,fi 1° , •s(f 1 i fP • .. •• P.avtntt Nadi s.4. • °!)N,,,,,e ' )1/ ''.•%,•• GPAYEL —} , ',•:',,z.z,..... .,.., tr-ElAY AMMO .. I `•:,-.t- '‘'' . a..1.. , ,,P• 9•('''' '''''. (0,.s4. NNN ' ..V oc. 40 ; . ..., . ,,,, , ................ ,,, r-.. i .,...:‘,a, • f .. . 33 N"..,.....,..... 1 2,,.........--v 'i IN.. I. 0.; ,r. j'ilf to. saa,ARLI/Pet- oT ,... AT4re• • "V_,I.....4 ......4:. g • r W•ille 7ilmira • •-cw.p., •. •/1 A.P:CMC'A.I..•:'• 2 . '. . Sa Moe I 1'40.4Y' ... / 06/24/96 10:07 FAX 206 AR 0220 •ENTRANCO ENG. Z 005/005 - l 1=b WO: zid 2t1B-7zi5 Z 1 mr-vrr IL., YF.I M LI i 17., rr,"c. CJc "J G; TRAFFICTH DATA GA ER/NG7 • 1 VOLUME SUMMARY PROJECT NO,,: 96-141 _ DATE: June 20, 1996 TIME PERIOD: 13:30 AM -7:30 PM LOCATION: Les Schwab Tire Center WEATHER: Sunny __ Renton,WA PREPARED BY: SN TIME W TIME INTERVAL DRIVEWAY INTERVAL D RIVEVVAY ENDING North MIdgJe South ENDING North - Middle South AT IN OUT IN cjt IN OU AT IN out IN OUT IN au? 6:45AM 1 0 1 0 1:15 PM 1! 1 PM 1 •7:45 AMlutliti i 0 0 0 2:15PM oiiiii •• AM II •111 0 • 0 2:30 E MM a 3:00 M 2 1 3 1 0 1 • 1 2 1 .2 ULI 1 3 0 0 o 101 5AM 0 2 1 • 3 2 4:45PM 1 2 1 2 1 • 0 1 3 1 5:00 PM a 4 1 1 o + 1 1 5 1 5:15PM o 1 0 2 3 • 11:00 AM • • ��� 5:30 PM • 11:15 AM 5:45 PM 1 2 o • '• 11:30 AM ' aIII 6:00 PM • 11:45 AM 1 0 o 2 1 0 6:16 PM • 12:00 PM 0 a • 2 2 2 6:30 PM_ 1 0 a • _ a o 12:15 PM • • 2 - 3 6;45 PM o 2 0 0 o 12:30 PM i + 1 3 1 7:00 PM . 0 1 0 1 0 0 12:45 PM 1 2 1 2 5 1 7:15 PM . 0 0 0 0 0 a 1:00 PM o 0 0 1 2 2 7:30 PM o 1 ' 0 o 0 0 Total(6:30 am-7:30 pm) 26 53 27 40 87 47 Peak Hour, IN : 2:45 PM-3:45 PM(20 Vehicles) Peak Hour,OUT: 4:30 PM-5:30 PM(22 Vehicles) Total IN= 140 peak Hour, COMBINED: 2:45 PM-3:45 PM(38 Vehic's.) Total OUT= 140 fi PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE REPORT RENTON LES SCHWAB Renton,Washington 4157 p\'ue e•P. rsn cr • I.EI ' , UtbGLvrwic_iv I PLANNING �4 0�WASy��� , CITY OF RENTON 4(1 h 'may raj O • O FCI'7EF � . S1oNALF'�C,�, EXPIRES 8/1/97 RECEWED JUN 2 4 1996 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Prepared by KPFF Consulting Engineers June 21, 1996 EXISTING CONDITIONS The site, located at 710 Rainier Avenue S., contains an existing Les Schwab Tire center on a 0.75 acre site. The existing 5700 square foot(sf)building is being remodeled to accommodate an additional 3500 sf for six service bays. 900 sf of the existing building will be demolished. The site characteristics are as follows: • Existing Asphalt Pavement: 0.40 Acres(17400 sf) • Existing Building: 0.13 Acres(5700 sf) • Existing Gravel Surface: 0.22 Acres(9800 sf) TOTAL: 0.75 Acres Currently,there are three on-site catch basins that convey storm water runoff from the site to the city storm sewer system located under Rainier Avenue S. The gravel lot at the south end of the site has been subject to vehicular traffic and essentially acts as an impervious surface. Storm runoff from the gravel lot flows to the on-site conveyance system. PROPOSED CONDITIONS The 3500 sf addition will be located on the gravel lot, the existing pavement, and within the demolition limits. The remaining portion of the gravel lot will be landscaped and paved for six additional parking stalls. The proposed site characteristics will be as follows: • Existing Asphalt Pavement to Remain: 0.35 Acres (15345 sf) • Existing Building to Remain: 0.11 Acres(4800 sf) • Additional Building area: 0.08 Acres(3500 sf) • Additional Asphalt Pavement: 0.15 Acres (6680 sf) • Additional Landscaping: 0.06 Acres (2575 sf) - TOTAL: 0.75 Acres Two additional catch basins will added in the south parking lot and will connect to an existing city owned catch basin located in the sidewalk adjacent to Rainier Avenue S. Area drains will be installed in the new service bays and a baffle oil water separator will be installed west of the building. The oil/water separator will discharge into the on-site sewer system. J • CORE REQUIREMENTS 1) Discharge at the Natural Location: All surface and storm water runoff will be discharged into the existing city system at the natural location without detriment to the adjacent and downstream properties. 2) Off-Site Analysis: From preliminary discussions with City of Renton staff, an off- site analysis will not be required. The 6,680 square feet of new pavement currently functions as an impervious surface in its existing state. 3) Runoff Control: The storm water runoff characteristics of the site will change very little between the improved and the existing conditions, resulting in a negligible difference between the existing and developed peak runoff rates. 4) Conveyance System: The existingon-site conveyance system will not be modified, Y Y however the proposed on-site conveyance system will be designed to convey the 25-year design storm as required by the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 5) Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control(TESC): On-site and off-site catch basins collecting storm water runoff from the construction site will be protected with filter fabric to prevent sedimentation from entering the city storm sewer system. Additional TESC measures will be provided as necessary to prevent runoff from the construction site to flow onto adjacent properties. 6) Maintenance and Operation: A copy of the Maintenance and Operation Manual will be submitted along with the permit application, and will be retained on-site by the owner. 7) Bonds and Liability: The owner/applicant will assume all responsibilities for bond and liability requirements. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS 1) Critical Drainage Areas: This project does not lie within a designated critical drainage area. 2) Compliance with an Existing Master Drainage Plan: The project does not lie within an area covered by an approved Master Drainage Plan. 3) Conditions Requiring a Master Drainage Plan: Not applicable. 4) Adopted Basin or Community Plan: Not applicable. 5) Special Water Quality Controls: Not applicable. 6) Coalescing Plate Oil/Water Separator: Not applicable. 7) Closed Depressions: Not applicable. 8) Use of Lakes,Wetlands,or Closed Depressions for Runoff Control: Not applicable. 9) Delineation of the 100 year Floodplain: According to the FEMA Flood Map 53033C0977 F, the project does not lie within a 100 year floodplain. 10) Flood Protection Facilities for Type 1 and Type 2 Streams: Not applicable. 11) Geotechnical Analysis and Report: A goetechnical report will not be provided. 12) Soils Analysis and Report: A soils report will be performed at a later date. *****************************-*********************************** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9603209 Amount : 1, 753 .20 06/24/96 15 :23 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #1040 SFP-A LTD Init : LN Project # : LUA96-078 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 192305-9044 Site Address : 710 RAINIER AV S Total Fees : 1, 753 . 20 This Payment 1, 753 .20 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 753 . 20 Balance : . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0019 Variance Fees 250 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 3 .20 , . ..., ,.\ .0, \ ' Ot 1 4\ : ' . " \ 1 "-' 1 \s, • . 4G c_n 104 _„,.=.-:_.:-.'"---,--.-----„ R0A . , • 1 . , \\ .-.---_ --- RA,- • . gi 15. .F4, 1 \ \ ‘ \ ,, ,,, „ \ 91•1‘,0 A .o• ...- ko /' I A - s. .)) ( ...---, .....--- , G. \ ' Illi - ;.• & PA •rj..Z`',,, • /, t\i' • • \ -T.L.i38 goo'I.°':•U L- ' /.. .'.... ;57 4_1 .,.-- CHRISTON-IERSON • -:(5- - EP 2 -IWO, • ,To ,,,, ‘_. . ‘.../. -sa 7 • . I\ '-• • . . wAU K _,.----<-:„145.E/1;;..7_-_-_':"X. •-•-bo--•:3. •-.16 Mi . , Ct.. - .• t\i//. • 0 .--c. . K 0 • 1 `...• \ .•-•, .:. POR.7:1..238 • • • ICA.'°• . Mit; . , -- . . .. L.) s. - • rt.f64 5011. - .7 ,. 4. :...-1 ..1215 \/ - /- • G 0 ‘ .., •C . 91.9. • • . p ... . • • _ , • s<, ick, =.• et s,4•7'.. ‘5.,' • . ' -60 5 ' -14•rTF91,- k , c,- \ ,,,, . • . .4. ' :,,.3. --8,-..,\.,9 . 0 ..T., .... • / . ,. • ,,„ . les 4.14 AG. 4 Q./ 1 .• •.'•5 ..,-.•:•: - N ‘ Cc\ - . . 430.1.:4,71 1'...,. .5 6 N'i• 1-549 . • • 7.1!z rc.s3 0‘i 1 --Avisiss%-..A11.1--- a AlitP°AC . 471.6G . 11.1) \ \ \ • . .) ___i- I. Z./././7 . ‘K .404] • 'i VI • , , pc."T c(7\'4\ \L \ ---‘3, / 1 ---Ims'ir• C147 ts-A 1 6 . c• ,,k. RES., ,A.41, • 4 .......1-§- - A ti L.,, I& gli 2.1:si t.-494c-r i . .... ‘-‘‘ . ‘., r- , ' 1'i 543 7 • ___..._ ST R A-19, LA ES . \ ;•'''' - ct - _j • . f' ' n° Ri • 10 • KO- ; Au KL& -r - 4- .- s- . .1niSEHASRES. 7..S•TR-ATO \-. 9,'' TZ.1.5E, (I) .. ', 2 F4 .. . . .. GO I 3.16 AC= _...... ''.' S - • . . ,, ..., 71.180 A• ' • • 0 / , • '''.. i a. 7, 'S..' .s7 % .. , \ - . T /72-• z•../..--• , /242m.,„ . ' s • e/ • " ' LA NE. :. . / -. ' GI '7'4 \ IA " ri,gg PE114 -• ' L,•tillir-r0 : 51 „ \ / - :, -.P_.,:s. • . _---- ----- . _ . \' •11. ' 494,0 \ 7:(.26/ ridGe taLnrilt..4 . r • , / ‘`).) • `?.,, N-, .- - . _-------- -/• 585 . • 1,7a, . . '- A- `h•'. ..•••••• .r• •- ' ROE. i . , . v..0i4.215A8C.,. . , ..0...,4.4./.::c.c. kli,..,.. ,.. :.=6 el . \ •0 \ • . , •'843s... ' . ''.7.•2L.(3.31t3".• .<5\....k. •lu--,.2.. ......,... T.4.7/8 .. _ .., .., . , ....,. , to•'6.::: ' „....1 . • 3/0.62 ' 9• • 4/ ,° ..7:9 UE3I • .. . z-,3.5, ,;,..;,•,,.., --, ..... ... ". DS '..-. < r=-' - S.P. 7781 tENTO SHORE iL\``..:',• - : CA ' . 71 v.. , . _ , do _ \. A . so, . 2;1 cv‘ - .. •rt '..6. •x KELLER & .., ,ORTHIvE57. 0 - .. C T 8 , 05.94 ' I , ' > el .• ' . .621 . ' V:46: '7 s' 629 .•.. CAvenme , M - I . , . (2) CURRAN -•.' '' ' • ':\_ • \ .2 •HARRY C.NANERSON - '04 . .6•49a 0../4. .(P1.- ROBERT. L. EDWARDS .`i _ / i 7.A./9/• '... •.°18v . 8 1 • . :05 Ac. ,... -7• • r) .. •41%,:o;._-,. I-mt.-m."41 .i.• :,..,.., .•:, 112 " '.:Ok• COWARDS- . ' .- H :••' • - , .. .,..till v: 1 A.'\.• N-1 I- 1. • ••. 7.4./v , .. , 253 4.71 Ac• . 1 • ; •rL..3,9 - - .. gr. • ' • % '. F,'4•1 , ";)***'•" ill*" • • .', .•. ciii Te..:40:. • • 1 • . . 40 ,is I:1 , -,t, • ...4?__L .• ;" . i!_. .• - • • • , -.. •- ,73-13.3 . • 4 ii- "j.', 60 iriegine. ....2„, •.•830'. i • :',• • lig. - • '''-' ____:__F.4: . ... • ., • ' • i..:..! .., .i t e . • . . .. . ••. . . -,..„-----. -'i'..-;•4.;-,--....m,, ..- :•-___ ,A, ,.'--fl." -rri •''' '•,..-,::Ae-', -':.- ' ..•.,..!..i4.47,,, ,, .:- .,..,. • -"77.71=:7•.1k 7 tel.-S.vv.---'.••1 1 n -••••-ST- -- . . . _. . . .120 - ,„ ' • 248.98 "6,, ' • __,0.5 . .. , 1 22A6a • ... . alr - '‘,. 100.6 1 ./4.3. , 1 , ' .tV• t V; - • - 14. , . I • tz: . . • . . iy, • o 1 i . . . 7.-1.39 I V?5.4'":1,'P.'GC- `r • '•?•:' • i f• '' • • •• •?•*., i • 0 tv i I G C. STORE -INC. 'co• /. • 1-4Pci<K•E-r. • 7 • C . •4 •,.,, • , •• cc{ i20 •,,,,,, . , . ••40_ _ 250 .‘i t4.1 ---. k • . /,‘ • /0, .,. LIJ 4' 3,, 7:L•42 . . • •I R-Es-r .:-.;\• • . , , • • . . z . . ‹t : 'l• ...' , f.- CO it • I 60 4.56Ac. r'TE] ' ' ' F' LI1R i•/: • • 1 -. . - • ›- . Li op . .800 7.i.48 T.L-,5 T.L 44 4 1 • C25 w • /40 . . < • E ii.. ' ,.,. • *. VICT,OR • ko ui • .9e - , . ' i ' 1/4,, DIAME3k1 , CC D . • ,. i. • • >- Li • w. (Z) . `. ••../i' ,•41.3 A6. ' . 3.06 Ac. All 0 ••6 • ° • ' `•• ‘2, 4.35 Ac' 2 . 2 2 < ¢ , 1 N • •") c9 ‹T ! • • - X 10 6 X • I , , . . '• UJ CC U 4 4.7 Z li-J . A • . ... . .II iv": • .kli.7 w aa r . \ ,.. 1 • . La o - • -r./.: . i • 4) \ . . CC • ' . .) \I . • ' • to' [11 . i 1 . ., ..... , . . . ' • • I I to . ri..32 '.77/-3 • . • . • i ••,...= • • - . • ;--11' , - I • . .' : . , , • ,,,J r.) , • • .. /2.6 • •T‘.\ER •. '. ' ' . • .. . 7:L.63. . . ., • .1:--0?, . . 7 1 . . ' .. '• , VIOIR , . , • ‘ Ar4 • . ' ' . . . 4/4 • \\G "r014 ' • ' ,, . • •. • •• . 2.55Ac• 'BUIR\-\' , • • • ,F-4 ' N . '•,. i N • • - - - ---.11 ' _. _ . /--....,••.: __ ..../ 35 -----7---'.. .' • , , . . - - • ,9- -- • .s. GP' A'• u• of.,Or . • 0 . ---- ,.- . . • . . • 0 _ • . • R\GVCt . . , . , _ i<• • . 1,45.,'1 • . - , ,s, • • • 4c. • N , °.? . . CO' • S. . . ' .. - ' 1 158.? \ • T.L.29 50 •r. , o a • . . t4 G2 AG• p,c? . i .9 - s P• • . .1 6..o\/ , . . , 1 • • 9. • • . 1 \,,:... . T L.-.13,• 1 . . . . .• I :HoPs ,.--- 80 i •• . ' i" • .- • I, ;,' 11.% I, • . , 1 ._...--- I- 1 . ! i z • I . '-a0B.55,---7---7\.,i -^-='71 ‘' -1" 1 \ i ---- . .. ' . .._____..373.`r".. ',' kki : c• , I'',, •• t1 f . j•-----,,,-,..B0 (I) •• .,_)_,-.---r--.•-•-• •••••••'•••••••"•• . vi.A.07 s 1 ' • ---7.," .a. \v•-/ . ' - ' '5;Z:‘....- .•• .7-7 •.: .?..:1'..............•:•..". - 60 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' I ' 1 Ii • 1•!' s-r---- • • SY' 1, , . • • 1 Q\I.. ; •. -.3/7.3/7-- • 1 .••••••-•• ,94/ .::::•'..,:•:::.. 1 I'-`-' • I Lf., ) 1 I . - ' Ar I •:•:*::..::::::::::::•-•-•::::..:.::-:C.::::::.:::::. ... . . 1 1 5 E I.:'E aD. I • --..._--- .)'D ......::::•:::-:-.:••••:-.•:*•.:,,::•'....:;•*'" 415•16 i • SIFIANN - . iii 0 410 4 i t;odiz tie I 1 I .,_ ':1',..4--"5"-e-:;;-‘ -.4 ' •••••::::'.:..'•:'::•::::••••••...:::".::::. .. . 1 .,,...,. . .1,DI, - ! I I . . . • '.....%;.:•:•:•:::•:••:..•.• . , P , . , ---2,7.7A''', - , • I O :::-.7•-••,:•.•,•••••;•.:•..:•::: ,1/4`b \ irc! % 7:4.5.4 I .1:117_ I 1 "'••..'i •; I I I I • •• c' •••••;'.;!.;.;•:•;•;.;:•.: °P. ' i .L., „A,. ,...v. ,_146.72--- ---- . ----I----\I ' *••••• 1 ' 'I. ''' I . i ZO ---- -,•9 • • • • • • - 159.53 1 f319 3/'' 1 I ::.•.••••••••;..' ' ,__ ____Fiit,_...._.. . .,..... -..-c i , 1 : P. . , , , ••:,60•:•••: : _, , . . 1 1 .nt , .. , „ ,, ," ' f,-.„ ; •••••...•:', •• .0 t's'i . 1 I • • 1-wocoytrr i ' "a.: 4100 : '' ' . " " iCe.),I "ii 14-1-1 •: :::(N...--.:.:: :4, 0 • icoi 1.• , ' 1240 •, , ,, ,,in gig 1 ,.,,,, 8 1'I s., :.:''‘.....•:': 'di 1 ID1 I ( . I • 6- .) i i 10 1 j • • • ,• r+) • •Lki .. '- . 4 I •••• 'I.• \ • • ...,.4 ,, . 4 • •-1,' : ....\.:•;:• : .. '"- ''' /. • -.: • . ,--, V A C At.E D.... I I Itlf.._. ,,, ci 54! ,].:•••...„ • . k.j• at)1 011 IN'I-1; '''I ...:...• :::.. . , V404:1-E0 ' `,°_, , ....,...r."7--- -T---r-7 77-7 7- ,‘\ q • 7 ,_-i _ , , r ?izi , I0 . , ; _,.......,i74.:)' 1---; ,,,, "„i •...ii,...v. : _,.--r• 1 1 , . ; •••,.. . 1 ;; , . ,. , ,x ; z - . - -1--: I . 1 . ;,-,.• ,:,...,:•:•••,. 1 . . •,40....,.i.k.•,,,, •. .. .. • ; • . •. • • • • kaw:,•;- ..; 1 . • . .. . . . ,..,,, • • , . : • . • . • . . . . . • . .. • • • - :. ..„ •,,,,,..,..,K,•, , • • .. • . • • 1 • - . : . .... .,;. ...;•-•;:,;....,/,...:•',..:::,:•, •..:,;:;;;.,..:p., :„..,,,,„.„..,, •• • I ...,. • - . - , -• -.., • •...,..,-;,•; -_,...,:-,;:•,..,,,,;.;... • -'-'`....,i-440.i &"'' . .. .. ,. •• - . • . ,. .• . . " .. - ';,'17..•kka,f i: . ., , . • ,•''.:. •'c•';!'',.-`ct.3.',,' nfAir,%7;t1',. . r • ' , i , , . . . . . . , ..:' '.. : ,..'.'...:• :',....!4-. . , ...,,,,,„ .. . , ' . • . ' . ' ' . .. . • . , , ,..1 .i?,-i..`4 1 ' • ' • '. . , • -. -:';''''2 i-5.1.: :-. -•'.4-4',":•,,',t .'''. •:.lit:''''r • „ .. -, . . " . . . 0YX.'i,!'-.f •'..':- ,`1:',•:-; •ve:,s,,Z,;.:. .'..`..H:;..",,,y Fkgr4:?...."-i,f,. •.:.,...-., i . • • .. • • - - ) -•,.., • • . ' • . • .... -,. '...:-,•-....---,,,.-. ,-• ',Mx:T. ;,L..g•*.fi:.,',.,.. .. .. . . ,,,,,:.4.,,i,.:. ..ive;•.:-.-54::.,,:: 1 • • . - • • . .• . „., . . . . •'‘.-..-i- -:',Y.',,,•:,;:,:.':;.... ..-,',-,..4,,,y, wi,..;.-w.. ....., .. .. .-:-.... . .' • . •... , . . . . - • ,; •''..!''''.0.,, ,''.•!' V-I.I.:. .,,,: :70,4•41.i• ...i.,.: ., - , • . .. .-. . . . - • „ . •,, :•.,•:• :::.)A,,,;:''.:':,"•:•::: • •:. :.0•,f.11, ,,.,•,,,rem :•4.61.,,n,,,A, . ..:'.,-•,; -;., • • • - , . • . . • , . , .. . . ., ...,,,:,,,,,,,,o,,,;,,e,,,, 2•-:':..':,'•.W.P, kyv,,..,,,,,,,,•r - ••-'••• , • ,. • . . • •-•• ,;...:. • • ••- • ,,:•-•:,--, •:.:,g;*litA i , . . . .. -.. . • , ,••,',••.----- . . • . - -•,.• ...,- . , ..,, .„., :„.,,. •''.41,!,-:211'0 R,,,-••••••7(:". .., I .•, . . . • . .: 4rik ir.,41.1vi•-i. .. . : • • - , . . W,,,,:;••24.,;•-.!,..., • . •• '. . • ' • • . - ! • .-,;',.. -. • . , ': ,,' -, .,..•: '::'. ::.:::"."...f..4.!,.:•• . ':'•t,1),i;;A?::1; z:t.:•-,s.n.7..... • , . . . . ' . . .. .. , , .,-,,:'• . , .... • , .. , ,„ .rgi.ei. :: • • '...,]::'::. ,.- 1 ' • ' , • ' . ' • • . , -.',..V. • .. „.. .r, ,,,. .„ , . . • ., ..,...... ..,'•• '4'''',Wil+,-, , . - . .. • .:•:••':.'•..••. ''.;,i1',,,,;.,.%':•'•. f:g!S ''.-•-4:::..Y!;,,f, `0A- •:-.4.:. i . . . • . . . , .• : • . ...., - • ,,,„:, ,-1-0•,24: :,T, 1 . . ' .' . . :;•,<. ' • .' • - ' • •'':,...:‘,.7::',.' 1.%';';',:,1%: •': .:•!..,,,e Li&S,',.'",' • .. . • . . . . . - • . .,••5 . . . ,- .., ,,....„. cili,l,L.,,,,,, . .„.., • . . 1 • , . • . . ' • \ -,,' , . . . ....,_ .. • ... .- , . • ,,•,.--- ,,,-- . .. Vi-•.,s,; (g..- .,, 1 . . •••,'",' .-, .„. .:::.., .•.'„,. ,: ,.,:,.,.:,,,-':,;!;:: ',',,:qi..;t:',#): ,„,,,„"••.,. ;:•,••,••• . -,.. " :. . • . .. .. • ' • :.' '-.': '.. ''''''''':'' .'.;•;,K>:Zi;b?-Pi rk-1,;',•::'•;,1' I ' ' ' • . ' . . . , •„L - • er,4,Ki;:.f,; ''• . ..,. • . ' i-.. • ' . ,• . ,':::i, • . ,,,... •-.:.,., ••• :,:.._-,..'''• ,,,'.:',',4.,%131. ,.•,,,;',.,•,:f.'i.s Aiz,',..„./.:1.,!.., 1 ' ' • • 1, :''.• ': :?te,,,,f,!,?,,..-, . •. 1, • • '-:,:...( ',3,- ' Ii:A'04 I • . . . . • •. `:4';',-:,:.,4 i .. ' ,,,, . . 'f.;!;: . . . .:,.,. .,..„ .• -",•IA'Nf.I, b,,77.•,•Ali.-.1.Z; • - . .''•• • • .'• .iii,•.'i',Y Ff,4,..,:''',;• • • • . , ' .' ..„ •'‘:,•:4='.4':'3`, ,,,-,•,.,-;;;.:•••.- 1 . ' '::,:. • . ',3'-', 1',.-. . • ' ' •'''''''•:1,'S., '''g.°5,' ''.' • • , .. ' , ''?'',-1,•' ;', ' I , . • ' '.ii•f.;.1 i'l;:.%ri:P....:• • 1 . . . '.'• . ' ',,;',.,,,i '.1,4:,2::•,,•:' . • i . . . . • ' I . • • , e.e.,:,',;,:.:.• ' . . ,t,....-.•X-.„ . . ,,. . , '',!:::i ci'.','F•'-':•• , ,. ., •• .•,„; , • ,:7., .- .- . 1 •, l'.',...i';:.': • . '4.:',.i=11::.ij,. i . , •,.' ;::,;,.:','A.:. ' • I . .. ,,. • • 'q';,;:".`... • ,. • ' • • ' . :,,q,', .. . , . , ' .