No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA88-071 CITY OF RENTON Onr04, s �� U.S.POSTA6Ftyq - ')epartment of Planning/Building/Public Works I� :!, . MAR29 91 i ~U` �i I� 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 J I }I A 1; F9002162 * : : PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF PENTON Burlington Northern, Inc . j 208 Central Bldg A 810 3rd Ave PR ® 3 1991 Seattle, WA 96104 ' F1UT DELIVERABLE .evd AS ADDRESSED 1661 TUNABLE 10 FORWARD ; UV Ws {{r s{ft itii{1{litt{isIIfiI[RETURN TO WRITER ` _ >.t id ' cr) %0 • CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator March 27, 1991 Dear Interested Party: This letter is notification that the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), designated as the SEPA responsible official for the City of Renton, issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Black River Corporate Park, Tracts A and B on March 27, 1991. The proponent is applying for a Building Permit, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, a Clearing, Grading and Filling Permit, Site Plan Approval, and a Routine Vegetation Removal Permit. The FEIS augments the Draft EIS by providing additional research and findings, publishing and answering letters received on the Draft, providing additional mitigation, and incorporating by reference a number of documents. These documents, listed below with an asterisk (*), may be viewed at the Renton Public Library, Main Branch, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, 98055. All others are available at the Metro Library, Exchange Building, 821 Second Ave. Seattle,98104-1598. 1974. Auburn Interceptor EIS *1980. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins, EIS and Appendices. Report No.910/9-80-077 1981. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency- Final EIS on the Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1983. Draft Supplemental EIS for the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report. 1983. Final Supplemental EIS on the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report 1983. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle/Draft and Final EISs, Sludge Management Plan. *1984. Final Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternative for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1984. Public Comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternatives for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. *1985. Draft EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. *1985. Final EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1986. Final Supplemental EIS for Secondary Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1988. Final Supplemental EIS for West Point Secondary Treatment Facilities. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ji Black River Corporate Park FEIS Issuance March 27, 1991 Page 2 *1991. Draft Supplemental EIS, Metro Treatment Plant at Renton. Additional copies of the Draft and Final Black River Corporate Park Tract A and B EIS are available at the third floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue, Renton,WA 98055. Each document costs$10.00 plus tax. The City of Renton will not take any official action on this project until the issuance of the Mitigation Document. The Mitigation Document will list the measures necessary to avoid significant adverse impacts on the environment. At the time this document is issued,the official appeal period on the adequacy of the EIS will begin. Under City of Renton Code 4-6-23, an appeal of the FEIS must be made to the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the permit or other approval is issued. The approval, i.e., underlying governmental action, in this case,the mitigation document. Public hearings on the appeal of the FEIS and/or the-land use actions are tentatively scheduled for the week of May 13 through May 20, 1991: When places and dates for the hearings are finalized, public notice will be published in the legal notice section of the Valley Daily News. Mary Lynne Myer, of my staff, is available to answer questions on the hearing dates and process. She may be reached at 235-2550. S.107irs, Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator CITY OF RENTON NEWS RELEASE NOTICE OF FEIS ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement on March 27, 1991 on the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII (ECF;SA;SM-071-88& ECF;SA-109-88). ERC will issue a mitigation measures document on the above project based on information from the DEIS and FEIS on April 1990 and March 1991. Description of Proposal: TRACT A - The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from one to four stories. These buildings would provide 183,600 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 800 autos. TRACT B The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from three to seven stories. These buildings would provide 286,200 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 500 autos and another 800 stalls would be provided in a three story parking structure. Location of Proposal: The project site is located on Oakesdale Avenue. Type of SEPA Review: Declaration of Significance, SEPA Scoping, Draft EIS, Public hearing on DEIS, Final EIS. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at Development Services, Third Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section • APPEAL: Any appeal as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements, pursuant to WAC 197- 11-68 must be consolidated with an appeal on the agency's decision on the proposed action. The mitigation document is this agency's decision which may be appealed together with the FEIS. These appeals may be filed with the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, by 5:00 PM, 20 days after the issuance of the mitigation document. CITY OF RENTON 14T04, i"-A�c� / ^\ U.S.POSTAGE�y-7 a )epartment of Planning/Building/Public Works ipp s MAR29 9f x�o` i ) y 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 PLANNING DIV 0,� a- PO F e R OVA �--- t i9002162 * a CITY OF RENTO APR ® 3 1991 — - _a'AECE VE4 Sharon : Elliott 13503 M. L. King Way S, NA401 Seattle. WA 98178 N* CITY OF RENTON NIL '1 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator March 27, 1991 Dear Interested Party: This letter is notification that the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), designated as the SEPA responsible official for the City of Renton, issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Black River Corporate Park, Tracts A and B on March 27, 1991. The proponent is applying for a Building Permit, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, a Clearing, Grading and Filling Permit, Site Plan Approval, and a Routine Vegetation Removal Permit. The FEIS augments the Draft EIS by providing additional research and findings, publishing and answering letters received on the Draft, providing additional mitigation, and incorporating by reference a number of documents. These documents, listed below with an asterisk (*), may be viewed at the Renton Public Library, Main Branch, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, 98055. All others are available at the Metro Library, Exchange Building, 821 Second Ave. Seattle,98104-1598. 1974. Auburn Interceptor EIS *1980. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins, EIS and Appendices. Report No. 910/9-80-077 1981. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -Final EIS on the Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1983. Draft Supplemental EIS for the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report. 1983. Final Supplemental EIS on the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report 1983. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle/Draft and Final EISs, Sludge Management Plan. *1984. Final Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternative for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1984. Public Comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternatives for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. *1985. Draft EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. *1985. Final EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1986. Final Supplemental EIS for Secondary Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1988. Final Supplemental EIS for West Point Secondary Treatment Facilities. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Black River Corporate Park FEIS Issuance March 27, 1991 Page 2 *1991. Draft Supplemental EIS, Metro Treatment Plant at Renton. Additional copies of the Draft and Final Black River Corporate Park Tract A and B EIS are available at the third floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue, Renton,WA 98055. Each document costs$10.00 plus tax. The City of Renton will not take any official action on this project until the issuance of the Mitigation Document. The Mitigation Document will list the measures necessary to avoid significant adverse impacts on the environment. At the time this document is issued,the official appeal period on the adequacy of the EIS will begin. Under City of Renton Code 4-6-23, an appeal of the FEIS must be made to the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the permit or other approval is issued. The approval, i.e., underlying governmental action, in this case,the mitigation document. I Public hearings on the appeal of the FEIS and/or the land use actions are tentatively scheduled for the week of May 13 through May 20, 1991. When places and dates for the hearings are finalized, public notice will be published in the legal notice section of the Valley Daily News. Mary Lynne Myer, of my staff, is available to answer questions on the hearing dates and process. She may be reached at 235-2550. S' ly yours, Eel Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator CITY OF RENTON NEWS RELEASE NOTICE OF FEIS ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement on March 27, 1991 on the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII (ECF;SA;SM-071-88 & ECF;SA-109-88). ERC will issue a mitigation measures document on the above project based on information from the DEIS and FEIS on April 1990 and March 1991. Description.of Proposal: TRACT A The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from one to four stories. These buildings would provide 183,600 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 800 autos. TRACT B The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from three to seven stories. These buildings would provide 286,200 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 500 autos and another 800 stalls would be provided in a three story parking structure. Location of Proposal: The project site is located on Oakesdale Avenue. Type of SEPA Review: Declaration of Significance, SEPA Scoping, Draft EIS, Public hearing on DEIS, Final EIS. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at Development Services, Third Floor, Municipal Building,200 Mill Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section APPEAL: Any appeal as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements, pursuant to WAC 197- 11-68 must be consolidated with an appeal on the agency's decision on the proposed action. The mitigation document is this agency's decision which may be appealed together with the FEIS. These appeals may be filed with the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, by 5:00 PM, 20 days after the issuance of the mitigation document. CITY OF RENTON v L 4 7_ .',. __0 -. __ _____1-- Q� r�i,�f� � �� Lam ; •co �j °. ti ..'-.: :k Po„ri,E S7" COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTlip\ )J-= 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 F<,,•I .� -w r 1 r 1, l :.fir ' ' -Z:-S A 7° - L J.- . _........era...".. -------—— , E-------- 7 _.,\ , _ • Dune lonsi<i ) �� 1 cmpir^e '�Jsy S. ''4i11 y f S _,ttle, WA 98178L-1/ — — - — a--.. ,y1/4Gbru; aqy 1 - :F.P:,,I.E r ,yam._:;. IUNAEtC.Sl FORWI',R�, t . / bJ �J 1 t i i t + t ` 4t p �Rt?l)RPd TO i�Rll Ell —` � . y i�l�ffif{ ItifPiSIiSi{fitiIt11i7i11i11a�9iiFli1li� 4$ i11 CITY OF RENTON F`mil. "LL ' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park Mitigation Document ECF;SA;SM-071-88&ECF;SA-109-88 Dear Interested Party: This is to inform you that, under SEPA, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-660, the City of Renton has issued a mitigation document for the Black River Corporate Park Environmental Impact Statement. Copies of the document are available at the public information counter (SEPA Information Center) in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: First CityDevelopment Corpproposes to build aphased project, includingthree one to P P P P P 1 four-story office buildings on 12.07 acres of Tract A, and three four to seven-story buildings on the 15.7 acre Tract B. Tract A will also include surface parking to accommodate the buildings on Tract A. Tract B will include the construction of a three- story parking structure and associated surface parking. The project is located north of Oaksdale Ave&West of Naches&7th. Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., June 17, 1991. See City Code Section 4-8-11,WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21 C.075. Any appeal as to the adequacy of the EIS must be filed with the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the decision was made to issue the mitigation document. All appeals must be received by June 17, 1991, 5:00 p.m. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections to either the mitigation document and/or the EIS. If you have any questions about the procedures for either appeal, please contact Mary Lynne Myer at 235- 2550. Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON itsNT04/ sA�—p 21 Department of Planning/Building/Public Works S —-- ii� -A iiIVI ION ,'U.i. i,•, 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 ITY OF REN N .371 i F= ��J a A h'Askk• --- \ F90027 2 : * A APR — 31991 R C '9WED 14ILLIAM J. HECKER 23415 SE 264 0 Maple Valley/ WA 93038 iPlOZ OELIVERAI3LE •�` d t i AS ADDRESSED c16E� 1 ztaadv li # t Il i1 i i ' }UNABLE TO FORWARD a :t :s �:t:3 ►a it3 t[I I Rt:itIRm Ft1'WRl7Fk 1 ›, ...4". CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator March 27, 1991 Dear Interested Party: This letter is notification that the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), designated as the SEPA responsible official for the City of Renton, issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Black River Corporate Park, Tracts A and B on March 27, 1991. The proponent is applying for a Building Permit, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, a Clearing, Grading and Filling Permit, Site Plan Approval,and a Routine Vegetation Removal Permit. The FEIS augments the Draft EIS by providing additional research and findings, publishing and answering letters received on the Draft, providing additional mitigation, and incorporating by reference a number of documents. These documents, listed below with an asterisk (*), may be viewed at the Renton Public Library, Main Branch, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, 98055. All others are available at the Metro Library, Exchange Building, 821 Second Ave. Seattle,98104-1598. 1974. Auburn Interceptor EIS *1980. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins, EIS and Appendices. Report No. 910/9-80-077 1981. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency- Final EIS on the Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1983. Draft Supplemental EIS for the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report. 1983. Final Supplemental EIS on the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report 1983. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle/Draft and Final EISs, Sludge Management Plan. *1984. Final Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternative for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1984. Public Comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternatives for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. *1985. Draft EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. *1985. Final EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1986. Final Supplemental EIS for Secondary Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1988. Final Supplemental EIS for West Point Secondary Treatment Facilities. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton., Washington 98055 Black River Corporate Park FEIS Issuance March 27, 1991 Page 2 *1991. Draft Supplemental EIS, Metro Treatment Plant at Renton. Additional copies of the Draft and Final Black River Corporate Park Tract A and B EIS are available at the third floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue, Renton,WA 98055. Each document costs$10.00 plus tax. The City of Renton will not take any official action on this project until the issuance of the Mitigation Document. The Mitigation Document will list the measures necessary to avoid significant adverse impacts on the environment. At the time this document is issued,the official appeal period on the adequacy of the EIS will begin. Under City of Renton Code 4-6-23, an appeal of the FEIS must be made to the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the permit or other approval is issued. The approval, i.e., underlying governmental action, in this case,the mitigation document. Public hearings on the appeal of the FEIS and/or the land use actions are tentatively scheduled for the week of May 13 through May 20, 1991. When places and dates for the hearings are finalized, public notice will be published in the legal notice section of the Valley Daily News. Mary Lynne Myer, of my staff, is available to answer questions on the hearing dates and process. She may be reached at 235-2550. nmrs, Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator 11 l it CITY OF RENTON NEWS RELEASE NOTICE OF FEIS ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement on March 27, 1991 on the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII (ECF;SA;SM-071-88 & ECF;SA-109-88). ERC will issue a mitigation measures document on the above project based on information from the DEIS and FEIS on April 1990 and March 1991. Description of Proposal: TRACT A The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from one to four stories. These buildings would provide 183,600 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 800 autos. TRACT B The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from three to seven stories. These buildings would provide 286,200 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 500 autos and another 800 stalls would be provided in a three story parking structure. Location of Proposal: The project site is located on Oakesdale Avenue. Type of SEPA Review: Declaration of Significance, SEPA Scoping, Draft EIS, Public hearing on DEIS, Final EIS. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at Development Services, Third Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section APPEAL: Any appeal as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements, pursuant to WAC 197- 11-68 must be consolidated with an appeal on the agency's decision on the proposed action. The mitigation document is this agency's decision which may be appealed together with the FEIS. These appeals may be filed with the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, by 5:00 PM, 20 days after the issuance of the mitigation document. CITY OF Department of Planning/Building/Public Works —"_ 1'VL g 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 ,�/)1 M F.e e� } . R NasH• 1 FVoZi z ,/ PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON /3 ° _ 41c, GOSa m APR - 3 1991 Sc � ye)/ RECEIVE / w 98778, ELL IS ' 481°l 8 30 1990 oq/u1 q1 ELLIOTT MOVEt � f R Tars IR s '•I 3 % CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator March 27, 1991 Dear Interested Party: This letter is notification that the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), designated as the SEPA responsible official for the City of Renton, issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Black River Corporate Park, Tracts A and B on March 27, 1991. The proponent is applying for a Building \. Permit, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, a Clearing, Grading and Filling Permit, Site Plan Approval,and a Routine Vegetation Removal Permit. The FEIS augments the Draft EIS by providing additional research and findings, publishing and answering letters received on the Draft, providing additional mitigation, and incorporating by reference a number of documents. These documents, listed below with an asterisk (*), may be viewed at the Renton Public Library, Main Branch, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, 98055. All others are available at the Metro Library, Exchange Building, 821 Second Ave. Seattle, 98104-1598. 1974. Auburn Interceptor EIS *1980. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins, EIS and Appendices. Report No.910/9-80-077 1981. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Final EIS on the Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1983. Draft Supplemental EIS for the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report. 1983. Final Supplemental EIS on the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report 1983. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle/Draft and Final ElSs, Sludge Management Plan. *1984. Final Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternative for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1984. Public Comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternatives for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. *1985. Draft EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. *1985. Final EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1986. Final Supplemental EIS for Secondary Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1988. Final Supplemental EIS for West Point Secondary Treatment Facilities. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Black River Corporate Park FEIS Issuance March 27, 1991 - . Page 2 *1991. Draft Supplemental EIS, Metro Treatment Plahtat Renton. N Additional copies of the Draft and Final Black River Corporate Park Tract A and B EIS are available at the third floor, Municipal Building,200 Mill Avenue, Renton,WA 98055. Each document costs$10.00 plus tax. R The City of Renton will not take any official action on this project until the issuance of the Mitigation Document. The Mitigation Document will list the measures necessary to avoid significant adverse impacts ,;' on the environment. At the time this document is issued,the official appeal period on the adequacy of the EIS will begin. Under City of Renton Code 4-6-23, an appeal of the FEIS must be made to the Hearing d . Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the permit or other approval is Issued. The approval, i.e., underlying governmental action, in this case,the mitigation document. Public hearings on the appeal of the FEIS and/or the land use actions are tentatively scheduled for the week of May 13 through May 20,1991. When places and dates for the hearings are finalized,public notice will be published in the legal notice section of the Valley Daily News. Mary Lynne Myer, of my staff, is available to answer questions on the hearing dates and process. She may be reached at 235-2550. fi 4, S' S ly yours, Efii/ � t f l Donald K Erickson,AICP I Zoning Administrator , 1 -- 1 I i I CITY OF RENTON NEWS RELEASE NOTICE OF FEIS ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement on March 27, 1991 on the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII (ECF;SA;SM-071-88 & ECF;SA-109-88). ERC will issue a mitigation measures document on the above project based on information from the DEIS and FEIS on April 1990 and March 1991. Description of Proposal: TRACT A The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from one to four stories. These buildings would provide 183,600 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 800 autos. TRACT B The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from three to seven stories. These buildings would provide 286,200 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 500 autos and another 800 stalls would be provided in a three story parking structure. Location of Proposal: The project site is located on Oakesdale Avenue. Type of SEPA Review: Declaration of Significance, SEPA Scoping, Draft EIS, Public hearing on DEIS, Final EIS. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at Development Services, Third Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section APPEAL: Any appeal as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements, pursuant to WAC 197- 11-68 must be consolidated with an appeal on the agency's decision on the proposed action. The mitigation document is this agency's decision which may be appealed together with the FEIS. These appeals may be filed with the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, by 5:00 PM, 20 days after the issuance of the mitigation document. CITY OF RENTONKTp� ,-,,`���.{ -,lT� ; Planning/Building/Public Works Department :lifr U.S.Posr � s; rAl31 91 ti• u ., 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 �,� I v : -;� - Damson ►J 114c-r)e-c Q 4o gk�r-)er ova eS - Gmmevt a l l�5 �o 'NE ) #Zo8 i ;" r"_:+lr�,"B [ -=- ,.; 9 5�> 4A 98052 NOTICE OF PROPOSED SITE PLAN APPROVAL/SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL' DEVELOPMENT PERMIT/ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMIT • APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Approval/Shoreline Substantial Development Permit/Routine Vegetation Management Permit Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII • ECF;SA;SSM;RVMP-071-88 ._ ECF;SA;SSM;RVMP-109-81 . DESCRIPTION:The applicant is seeking site plan approval to develop an office park complex on a currently vacant 27.76 acre site (including Tract A at 525,536 square feet and Tract B at 683,762 square feet). Tract A is proposed to be developed with three office buildings (Building A at one story, and Buildings B & C at four• stories each), open parking, landscaping, recreation, and a screen (berming/lanscaping) which separates the site from the abutting wildlife habitat (including a heron rookery). Tract B.is proposed to be developed with three office buildings (Buildings D & F at five stories and Building E at four stories). This tract will also include a four story parking garage, open parking, on-site recreation, landscaping, and a screen (berm and landscaping) which separates the site from the neighboring wildlife habitat. • The applicant is also seeking a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit based upon the proximity of the site to the Black River basin. A Routine Vegetation Management Permit will be required, as well. GENERAL LOCATION: North of SW 7th, East of Oakesdale and West of Naches PUBLIC APPROVALS: . Environmental Review Site Plan Approval . Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site'pian approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. • \ ' -' r "474 , •, !3 ei°"IIO^PoiO /,- `\ _ _-_ __ \ l 1,11 VICINITY MAP • J.s..8°,p`. 3;_ i.ismi4 1/// 17:,._ \ ,, i?' hi it__-- \ ..„3;,p..\..../., : ,,.,,,, ,.. .. .. ;Atli .r.,,,„ n,. v.:A I y, ,, ,..___,..‘, "p-4.--,:., .. .,?, II . - : ...1,-,i , . t y ......., f, 4 / , \ ip, 0.\---If t..2 ii ::.• .:i:;V, rd!g;....';::,c.,- • ., i - F /l ', Yl \ „...,, J /r \' �J�� .4, ,..p 7„' 811,• .-gyp HERO N EXHIBM, i ! .\. r, ,,......_,.. .//8., _-..',.=_ — it,.‘,";-* iiv fy 1 kr-- ,. ,, s....______3____ _7\ :/' • '.1' \. o..,• ia �I t\\- ")0�l //.[j /• /J �� o'er �' I \l�\\ \,V \1 l,- f . /'e i y."-' ,fir-ilk. •`\ ` ..>\ ,`-;• :. y 11I``lr.,' n.. \ 1', '\ c' \ Cw l�. a�=-i ' %'/, _ ,`'` %, I � d�.eta= ��==�'`��I ,'. ,, . �� � ...�_. 1t1 II, (' I .. +1 x y1rY_isn• t' I, f LL{I�1'&��\\,li:�`� '�% / •, ', ' �i}. ..� • g; 'ik z' •'mil _ �' it 1 I ) Y E 1': 1" i`• : A '_ '.' ice'°i _ • 4_ -'. ^'� j, :4„,- .: .v, ee. 0 4 , , - ...,,_ „...k..../,.„ ,..• ''''i'..S.:.•. . Site Area 1-683,762S.F.._ ' '` `� �.; ; BLACKRIVER ' Building Area 2286,1005.F. ,�� -=.�;_/ - CORPORATE PARK Gross Coverage _41.9% 1•L\ / I Site Coverage 9%Ir.elpe,l..cl c.,.p.l \, Y'yp/ ,,,,,,,-, RENTON WASHINGTON a � Parking \`, FIRST CITY DEVELOPMENTS CORP. Parking wbo 51.Y. -•r_n_.� Compact fie.51.4 (""I N. \ Hadlcap .16 SI.Y. • w' _1,380 Stalls 111107 sr, genmalot IMPimillIMPINWRIPIIIIIIIPIr --'1111111111111111111111111r ' - 7-1111111111111111111111•11111111111,1011PIMI. ,-- •.1 CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT i -6, c:,__,..._:,,,,, u.S.POSTA.::,',-tf-,.:,\•:.. ) MAY 10 DI ) -- -;:?t I...rl 0 r: f'-'--' ''''''i.!,I.. -; • ' Z 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 j :::._''i • --ii • - (-------r- Barbara Favil . ) 14300 SE - 176Ii, 4 N5 11 . Renton, WA 8058 ,,- . NOT DELAEllitd; -::::----------,17:4 AS ADORES1'ZEE," (‘;:**, 1 E;r. 1 0 1 , - . _ 4 , - -- .., 'Cl',„.__?,--4 , I i' -2. • _ __Y „, UNABLE TO FCB-riiIRD ‘,...1 iz . RETURN TO SENDER j -47 "3-1>. illiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidilitlifilliliiiiiiiiiidlijilil -".• --- --,;- - N CITY OF RENTON ..u. { *' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 10, 1991 • 111 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII Final Environmental Impact Statement Dear Recipient/Party of Interest: The Black River Final Environmental Impact Statement included a section on cumulative impacts, reflecting the potential for development of several projects in the vicinity of the Corporate Park. These projects included the projected expansion of the Metro Wastewater Treatment Facility. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement for this project was released just prior to the Black River FEIS. The Final EIS included erroneous information which necessitates a revision. This letter documents that revision. Attached, please find an errata sheet for this item. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call 235-2550. S' ely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Principal Planner 111 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ERRATA SHEET Please substitute the following paragraph for Paragraph 3, page 3-62 in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII. Offensive odors could occasionally be generated from the treatment facility and extend beyond the boundaries of the site, even with Metro's proposed odor control ' plan. These odors most likely would come from mechanical failures, emergencies or system upsets, or, infrequently, unusual circumstances during day-to-day operations. These odors have the greatest potential for crossing Tracts A and B when the prevailing winds are from the south and southwest. CITY OF RENTON ;;;1,:T4 � ;� -,��__ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MAY 10 9i I `-_- w'' +�'% , C- :tea 1tiLsaL g IN 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 f p ; �) RECEIVED MAY 1 3 1991 NOT METRO MAIL City af . Seattle 821 2nd Ave Seattle, WA 9 1 u4 3ii£JT DELiYEFk - - iAS ADDRESSti l _ (� r��: _ 1UNABLE TO FGRWARD "'- --- `� W�' RETURN TO SENDER \'t1 � 11,1„1„1i,,,111=,„rf,al,,,llei,i,,ri.�'li,ir,,,i,ii CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 10, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII Final Environmental Impact Statement Dear Recipient/Party of Interest: The Black River Final Environmental Impact Statement included a section on cumulative impacts, reflecting the potential for development of several projects in the vicinity of the Corporate Park. These projects included the projected expansion of the Metro Wastewater Treatment Facility. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement for this project was released just prior to the Black River FEIS. The Final EIS included erroneous information which necessitates a revision. This letter documents that revision. Attached, please find an errata sheet for this item. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call 235-2550. Donald K. Erickson,AICP Principal Planner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ERRATA SHEET Please substitute the following paragraph for Paragraph 3, page 3-62 in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII. Offensive odors could occasionally be generated from the treatment facility and extend beyond the boundaries of the site, even with Metro's proposed odor control plan. These odors most likely would come from mechanical failures, emergencies or system upsets, or, infrequently, unusual circumstances during day-to-day operations. These odors have the greatest potential for crossing Tracts A and B when the prevailing winds are from the south and southwest. - Y --- -- • CITY OF RENTON %rcksam , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT �f �` r_ _ u.s.r s;,;t;y , f1AI 10 91 may, ti•^ ^• r .{�ri , 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 _` '' killS".) --S -21/ C F.9GUzIN? " t rBurlington Northern, Inc . I 208 Central Bldg :: :ett,l1L 07416 4 . Si I! 1'F '` ""r I 810 3rd Ave Seattle, ! A 98104 su ,,eig 0" t#4 L .. ___ _____-__—_ p RcSEftert :: CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 10, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII Final Environmental Impact Statement Dear Recipient/Party of Interest: The Black River Final Environmental Impact Statement included a section on cumulative impacts, reflecting the potential for development of several projects in the vicinity of the Corporate Park. These projects included the projected expansion of the Metro Wastewater Treatment Facility. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement for this project was released just prior to the Black River FEIS. The Final EIS included erroneous information which necessitates a revision. This letter documents that revision. Attached, please find an errata sheet for this item. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call 235-2550. Donald K. Erickson,AICP Principal Planner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ERRATA SHEET Please substitute the following paragraph for Paragraph 3, page 3-62 in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII. Offensive odors could occasionally be generated from the treatment facility and extend beyond the boundaries of the site, even with Metro's proposed odor control plan. These odors most likely would come from mechanical failures, emergencies or system upsets, or, infrequently, unusual circumstances during day-to-day operations. These odors have the greatest potential for crossing Tracts A and B when the prevailing winds are from the south and southwest. 1 Poluir. Niiiir iirignimit , . . _ . CITY OF RENTON ,,,/- :-141t . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT / :- -7,-111 ih'i,- -• 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 flAY1091 %-----7;F,T----,__,----2; I..7-,,t(17 r; '',"•.(,' •,:' • •:,_- •/ I - --. LeAnn T . L d aFon • .---)mi ) 1411 Grant Ava S, #G103 1,-<•• //7 v C4/7..„.,5 Renton, WA 98055 40 r . ',..i -tr i t 1: oi DE LAV. . .1----,,,,.'-------„el • AS ADDRE I . j i UNABLE TO)--- ;_.; -- ," RETURN TO SENDER ....1 'c:(:" 1661 kr5i a, c! ,‘10! • - - ., 64:0t hdAddhuddnhhundhAdddmdid CITY OF RENTON "LL • Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 10, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII Final.Environmental Impact Statement Dear Recipient/Party of Interest: The Black River Final Environmental Impact Statement included a section on cumulative impacts, reflecting the potential for development of several projects in the vicinity of the Corporate Park. These projects included the projected expansion of the Metro Wastewater Treatment Facility. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement for this project was released just prior to the Black River FEIS. The Final EIS included erroneous information which necessitates a revision. This letter documents that revision. Attached, please find an errata sheet for this item. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call 235-2550. Donald K. Erickson,AICP Principal Planner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ERRATA SHEET Please substitute the following paragraph for Paragraph 3, page 3-62 in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII. Offensive odors could occasionally be generated from the treatment facility and extend beyond the boundaries of the site, even with Metro's proposed odor control plan. These odors most likely would come from mechanical failures, emergencies or system upsets, or, infrequently, unusual circumstances during day-to-day operations. These odors have the greatest potential for crossing Tracts A and B when the prevailing winds are from the south and southwest. CITY OF RENTON r ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT f =w ; , f1AY 10 91 I-."",. !v�I 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 / c _^ () ;) , WILLIAM J. HECKER 23415 SE 264 f A-'tm"r -3. g;, "&y .- l�if@ 4 gc,: ` �� $ Par, "*T�y .F7fd � tea` r:, Maple Valley. WA 98038 I _ '`''1Tt- ,• i! OWE , + ,.��# — — •" ' M~ CITY OF RENTON iiF,•y.:, tip., i. "LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 10, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII Final Environmental Impact Statement Dear Recipient/Party of Interest: The Black River Final Environmental Impact Statement included a section on cumulative impacts, reflecting the potential for development of several projects in the vicinity of the Corporate Park. These projects included the projected expansion of the Metro Wastewater Treatment Facility. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement for this project was released just prior to the Black River FEIS. The Final EIS included erroneous information which necessitates a revision. This letter documents that revision. Attached, please find an errata sheet for this item. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call 235-2550. dita Donald K. Erickson,AICP Principal Planner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ERRATA SHEET Please substitute the following paragraph for Paragraph 3, page 3-62 in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII. Offensive odors could occasionally be generated from the treatment facility and extend beyond the boundaries of the site, even with Metro's proposed odor control plan. These odors most likely would come from mechanical failures, emergencies or system upsets, or, infrequently, unusual circumstances during day-to-day operations. These odors have the greatest potential for crossing Tracts A and B when the prevailing winds are from the south and southwest. CITY OF RENTON 75 ../. -4 \ ,-- , c„...„:;_, U.:,-.COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MAT 10 91 WlE-=-1- 1-,,'"I'l n V,I. ', 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 • 11/1 SI\' sc...4 .7:.;.-. Sharon , Elliott 135'03 M . L. .: Kino Way S. 4 A401 ELLISSNA na,140-asLatii- OgOAAVIS Seattle. WA 98178 ELLTATT .., MIMEO LEFT t4:0 ARBREEli: 1 WANE le getiggRa gETORN. s TO___ • _ ENOER _ 11 CITY OF RENT ON .y, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 10, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII Final Environmental Impact Statement Dear Recipient/Party of Interest: The Black River Final Environmental Impact Statement included a section on cumulative impacts, reflecting the potential for development of several projects in the vicinity of the Corporate Park. These projects included the projected expansion of the Metro Wastewater Treatment Facility. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement for this project was released just prior to the Black River FEIS. The Final EIS included erroneous information which necessitates a revision. This letter documents that revision. Attached, please find an errata sheet for this item. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call 235-2550. S' ely, Donald K. Erickson,AICP Principal Planner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ERRATA SHEET Please substitute the following paragraph for Paragraph 3, page 3-62 in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII. Offensive odors could occasionally be generated from the treatment facility and extend beyond the boundaries of the site, even with Metro's proposed odor control plan. These odors most likely would come from mechanical failures, emergencies or system upsets, or, infrequently, unusual circumstances during day-to-day operations. These odors have the greatest potential for crossing Tracts A and B when the prevailing winds are from the south and southwest. CITY OF RENTON l0/INs, w-...:-_--,. ...,---...._.-7,,,,,„ , —‘ , , ,-, POSTtitiE- --: ' ) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1( u.s. MAY1091 \ --'':: - ' lir): 200 Mill Avenue South- -Renton, Washington 98055 L.. ',--' -Let_:::i i • : ( ,' Amy . Forrester .-"- 4702 Davis Ave S f #2 5 1 0 1 - Renton, WA 98056 _.,.. ........_ ....______—....._____3 A 0 R E S. _ if I,r.I - '---- .) iUN ii:NOW N ------ -------,-,-.1 4 t;I Avn p, • IRETON T 0 SENDER '4,1,!..02/' _ • 11.1.11,1.1111111,WiiiiiimilliiiMiLidilill _ _ CITY OF RENTON #:. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 10, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII Final Environmental Impact Statement Dear Recipient/Party of Interest: The Black River Final Environmental Impact Statement included a section on cumulative impacts, reflecting the potential for development of several projects in the vicinity of the Corporate Park. These projects included the projected expansion of the Metro Wastewater Treatment Facility. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement for this project was released just prior to the Black River FEIS. The Final EIS included erroneous information which necessitates a revision. This letter documents that revision. Attached, please find an errata sheet for this item. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call 235-2550. s• Iy, Donald K. Erickson,AICP Principal Planner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ERRATA SHEET Please substitute the following paragraph for Paragraph 3, page 3-62 in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII. Offensive odors could occasionally be generated from the treatment facility and extend beyond the boundaries of the site, even with Metro's proposed odor control plan. These odors most likely would come from mechanical failures, emergencies or system upsets, or, infrequently, unusual circumstances during day-to-day operations. These odors have the greatest potential for crossing Tracts A and B when the prevailing winds are from the south and southwest. - CIT Y OF RENTON �� ,0� G ' �` u.S.POSTAuE�q - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT -- 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 • ` iY ;; ; ) J f "r-: E P-_. n a F/P,S2• :-, ` , 9002162 :e a. 1 4k ,A): ez . vl _ _ _ i , -, ___. Kathy Wilkins Seattle , - 3'th AveSe _ ,1:i1'.A. LE TO bORWARD v--11 i��d 41- r.v `7 r i R+ rip. ( ♦r �� U r.ra TO rl R l l r.k li dp 1. t. �+% , C= CITY OF RENTON "LL ; Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 24, 1991. SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park Mitigation Document ECF;SA;SM-071-88&ECF;SA-109-88 Dear Interested Party: This is to inform you that, under SEPA, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-660, the City of Renton has issued a mitigation document for the Black River Corporate Park Environmental Impact Statement. Copies of the document are available at the public information counter .(SEPA Information Center) in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: First City Development Corp proposes to build a phased project, including three one to four-story office buildings on 12.07 acres of Tract A, and three four to seven-story buildings on the 15.7 acre Tract B. Tract A will also include surface parking to accommodate the buildings on Tract A. Tract B will include the construction of a three- story parking structure and associated surface parking. The project is located north of Oaksdale Ave&West of Naches&7th. Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., June 17, 1991. See City Code Section 4-8-11,WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21 C.075. Any appeal as to the adequacy of the EIS must be filed with the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the decision was made to issue the mitigation document. All appeals must be received by June 17, 1991, 5:00 p.m. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections to either the mitigation document and/or the EIS. If you have any questions about the procedures for either appeal, please contact Mary Lynne Myer at 235- 2550. (73 Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • I ' CITY OF RENTON <NTo O TA" �y \ JU.S.POS•TAG Aq COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT =_' r lj� 4 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 • . C• = j y j it , WA VA- L 1 i 1 9002162 r. n , • Mary M. Anderson 13618 SE 180-th . Renton, WA 9805, A; 4 �,w, EFrJA / ± � --- _ )i_n._---- (b-- --- 1 -- , CITY OF RENTON seLLj..ry Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park Mitigation Document ECF;SA;SM-071-88&ECF;SA-109-88 Dear Interested Party: , This is to inform you that, under SEPA, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-660, the City of Renton has issued a mitigation document for the Black River Corporate Park Environmental Impact Statement. Copies of the document are available at the public information counter (SEPA Information Center) in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: First City Development Corp proposes to build a phased project, including three one to four-story office buildings on 12.07 acres of Tract A, and three four to seven-story buildings on the 15.7 acre Tract B. Tract A will also include surface parking to accommodate the buildings on Tract A. Tract B will include the construction of a three- story parking structure and associated surface parking. The project is located north of Oaksdale Ave&West of Naches&7th. Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., June 17, 1991. See City Code Section 4-8-11,WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21 C.075. Any appeal as to the adequacy of the EIS must be filed with the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the decision was made to issue the mitigation document. All appeals must be received by June 17, 1991, 5:00 p.m. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections to either the mitigation document and/or the EIS. If you have any questions about the procedures for either appeal, please contact Mary Lynne Myer at 235- 2550. . -0144/4" • Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue'South - Renton, Washington 98055 • -- CITY OF RENTON . .. 'A.CA-:-•--.'• U.S.POSTAU.1 -.--..„, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MAY 28 91 - -1-.,___ ,L7-7---3 1:4 r,') 0 . 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 _,-;,k' 1- i...,,,-........ C -271! • WASV- ,--<•_,I;/ . ., E:a I 1c 90D21E2 * * , , , NIO St...ii::::H it------A 1"11:,iriP•IED I NS 01,--•1-I C I EN I A 1....0....IR ESS---1,-;1•:::.:1:,'U'::::.:E.0-- 1 Li N 111:,..L., AS •:i31-1k.IWIN.1 I...IN A:Bt...E •r ID Fw1::(------.. AN I ——---I..)N I.:1....A I ME I:I-----Mt...N A----- Rou i•E - it 051 I NIT f ff;!...:3 .- . (------ -'' ( (-- - - „ .....-- m v Forrss+-csr -- ) .,.. D FA vi.,-5---Ave S. #25-1 01 Rentor>.----WA 9 SO 5 6 ;NCr- _ 'L,'. :,-.,•..E '---"---,-c:: :"------_,....1:--i '' 1 i a8LE TO FCrJTRD - ; . ., --„, ''',)>•, c')/ laluil:1 I ..;;E:NDER 1 .'\41._1 fillithihniiiiitintlimitil 1,..,._......._,..... - 4. "" CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park Mitigation Document ECF;SA;SM-071-88&ECF;SA-109-88 Dear Interested Party: This is to inform you that, under SEPA, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-660, the City of Renton has issued a mitigation document for the Black River Corporate Park Environmental Impact Statement. Copies of the document are available at the public information counter (SEPA Information Center) in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, • Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: First City Development Corp proposes to build a phased project, including three one to four-story office buildings on 12.07 acres of Tract A, and three four to seven-story buildings on the 15.7 acre Tract B. Tract A will also include surface parking to accommodate the buildings on Tract A. Tract B will include the construction of a three- story parking structure and associated surface parking. The project is located north of Oaksdale Ave&West of Naches&7th. Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., June 17, 1991. See City Code Section 4-8-11,WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21C.075. Any appeal as to the adequacy of the EIS must be filed with the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days111 of the date the decision was made to issue the mitigation document. All appeals must be received by June 17, 1991, 5:00 p.m. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections to either the mitigation document and/or the EIS. If you have any questions about the procedures for either appeal, please contact Mary Lynne Myer at 235- 2550. Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 •CITY OF RENTON ---I- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT •( \ - ,„..- TO low SENDER '. it r.,:-:•;:ija:R,•::L.----,il.:3 POSI-AbLi., -•:•,7----' 1\ -7----1---2-7:: : i,7 7,.•-'...? j - ro ‘--&z7.--,:--z-,- - i i IlAY 4 .,-.1,-,-, ;-_7c 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 REASON CH EC 0 ) - KED . • \ • -'-' -'''k PLANNING DIVISION llocl aimed Refused __ \ CITY OF RENTON Attempted-Pict known ----.1f,A•st;..J .k ---x" ' -- '''' ' `•- Inf...!fficient Address ZLL---__ MA! 1 6 1990 No sncii street-nu nibcr-- No -nth office in state • -" - ' -- - o not remail in this envelop:a 4 RECEIVED Public A ' eology Office ' Univerii ' of Wasninoton ijiLltlill‘ ! -' 213 Engin e ino Ann FM-12 . Seattle. t A 98195 1 , 1 . 4 aii oto ,• . . . . . ....:.••., ,.i0g3 __ _. . ._ • ,'''.••'.'' ,:‘,L.: cP.OFIESPONDENTS /11U) 1 ) II • OF coasecr_,. ADDRESS, INCLUDE MAILSTOP , -„. _ • • . \ .. , , .. . 11.1..lithilillivhbilil • • NOTICE OF EXTENDED COMMENT PERIOD RENTON,WASHINGTON The City of Renton has extended the official comment period for Black River Corporate Park DEIS (ECF;SA;SM-071-88/ECF;SA;SM-109-89) from May 11, 1990 to May 25, 1990. All comments must be postmarked on or before May 25, 1990,to be considered. Please send comments to: Community Development Department Attention: Mary Lynne Myer, Project Manager Renton City Hall 200 Mill Ave S Renton,Washington 98055 Published: May 7, 1990 I — __ -- - - ---„..,. • ,- 'CITY 0:0 RENTON 7,--,,-0,----,---4,\ U.S.POSTAtiAa--) .:z COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT- \ ....—=--:__--;;,.1 17A----- -r---,-,---,., _ , ( [1.41'10 91 "`Z-'- -::--i I:t•;7 0 j';! i A 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 ,.. _,,,,,, ,, ,•-.1 _,, , * * -- --0 * * t , . . • /"--- • _______,,„ ( , \ I Dept of Social/Health Services r , State of Washington 111 2 S Quince I RaJ_1_e,v u e. WA - 98-aos 4 7 ;NOT DEPe N. • \ 01 ,-,•) I 5 6 I t,i,,' AS ADDREK \ <*.--. i i (9) pi km ! ‘I ' , / „i, IL ..E TO FUI-iviAtiu — e_ n v ,71 . .•. •,.., RETURN TO SENDER , • <PI --1—k*W' -Ifiliiiiiiiiiiiillmilillif fill ,. .7 _. CITY OF RENTON "LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 10, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII Final Environmental Impact Statement Dear Recipient/Party of Interest: The Black River Final Environmental Impact Statement included a section on cumulative impacts, reflecting the potential for development of several projects in the vicinity of the Corporate Park. These projects included the projected expansion of the Metro Wastewater Treatment Facility. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement for this project was released just prior to the Black River FEIS. The Final EIS included erroneous information which necessitates a revision. This letter documents that revision. Attached, please find an errata sheet for this item. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call 235-2550. Donald K. Erickson,AICP Principal Planner • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ERRATA SHEET Please substitute the following paragraph for Paragraph 3, page 3-62 in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII. Offensive odors could occasionally be generated from the treatment facility and extend beyond the boundaries of the site, even with Metro's proposed odor control plan. These odors most likely would come from mechanical failures, emergencies or system upsets, or, infrequently, unusual circumstances during day-to-day operations. These odors have the greatest potential for crossing Tracts A and B when the prevailing winds are from the south and southwest. • --- CITY OF RENTON „-_...E_ \s, 6,^,,U.S.POSTAGE ,`;;.;' %r �: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ,_.7' ^ r i � rtar 1 o s 1 -v-7 1 . . ,e c 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 I -�� 1 ` " `}j !yAa � \ �v. \ S' , 1 F2 * * . Mary M: Anderson i 1 13618 SE 180th Renton, WA 98058 Nc.-o DELI .� _,k ,,,-s,..�;1i, , yy tM. ADDR` <.- -„1- J--- - -''�-- 1E�6! \--- --- BLE TO FCRWARD '' ',,�>� IA1V c,,. i 'F F�'1URN TO SENDER �. �'f`>," iiiiiiifii tiiiiFiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiilla e117if111 • -4 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 10, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII Final Environmental Impact Statement Dear Recipient/Party of Interest: The Black River Final Environmental Impact Statement included a section on cumulative impacts, reflecting the potential for development of several projects in the vicinity of the Corporate Park. These projects included the projected expansion of the Metro Wastewater Treatment Facility. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement for this project was released just prior to the Black River FEIS. The Final EIS included erroneous information which necessitates a revision. This letter documents that revision. Attached, please find an errata sheet for this item. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call 235-2550. Donald K. Erickson,AICP Principal Planner • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ERRATA SHEET Please substitute the following paragraph for Paragraph 3, page 3-62 in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII. Offensive odors could occasionally be generated from the treatment facility and extend beyond the boundaries of the site, even with Metro's proposed odor control plan. These odors most likely would come from mechanical failures, emergencies or system upsets, or, infrequently, unusual circumstances during day-to-day operations. These odors have the greatest potential for crossing Tracts A and B when the prevailing winds are from the south and southwest. - . CITY OF RENTON Q-Er41-04>N\ grte. -U STPOST'AGE `- '' --"L 1 1,--:7__...-1 . i,,<,..•s COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT riAY28 91 r_.4,: _.7-1.4›.(-:? cti 1,q, . ---k,•. 1 •-•- '-' ! •,) 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 • • • __ .. _--- / i Dept of Social/Health Services State of Washington 1112 S Quince Bellevue. WA Q -00.5 . r------ ,.. [NOT DELIVEI i"---- ---.._i---1 cl:; 1E61 cl'i 1AS ADDRE 'S' ,. \--(4 1 I .. ...._ rti • ./ ...--/ !UNABLE TO FGRIediu — kes.. WV ..7 • ., . RETURN TO SENDER <Pi •3-N • HJAJAHLAIII.Jd _____ • r w, , CITY OF RENTON sia ' ; Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park Mitigation Document ECF;SA;SM-071-88&ECF;SA-109-88 Dear Interested Party: This is to inform you that, under SEPA, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-660, the City of Renton has issued a mitigation document for the Black River Corporate Park Environmental Impact Statement. Copies of the document are available at the public information counter (SEPA Information Center) in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: First City Development Corp proposes to build a phased project, including three one to four-story office buildings on 12.07 acres of Tract A, and three four to seven-story buildings on the 15.7 acre Tract B. Tract A will also include surface parking to accommodate the buildings on Tract A. Tract B will include the construction of a three- story parking structure and associated surface parking. The project is located north of Oaksdale Ave&West of Naches&7th. Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., June 17, 1991. See City Code Section 4-8-11,WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21 C.075. Any appeal as to the adequacy of the EIS must be filed with the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the decision was made to issue the mitigation document. All appeals must be received by June 17, 1991, 5:00 p.m. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections to either the mitigation document and/or the EIS. If you have any questions about the procedures for either appeal, please contact Mary Lynne Myer at 235- 2550. Ced) Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator - 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 . . . „ CITY OF RENTON "„„ fr \/ 1-/-4- --i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Ii•F ‘-1, MAY 28 91 rs-__, , -..;1 _ ,...,„ r., -7-Z-:.•; I Z.:r,.I L: i'•'! : . ``'`q '' 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 ---F2 ii -,-, --sq ( n4EYER-"' • /1!,1 S Vi• \ ',' ___ - _ ---, I (-- -----\ ) 3arbara Faville . 14300 SE 175th, PN5 Renton/ WA 98058 • BLE ,-.. - AS (: ,,-....__1I - .) .—. UNABLE TO Fur-cw-A-Pi., -"----------11-'' _ • ,... ", RETURN TO WRITER I/ . _ \.."W ' ::. 6 1 tt tit ti t It t 11 '111 ifillifilliiiiiiiii1111,11:1111114111i111/11111,1011 L...... ...._ 3 \.:..- "•::•,., , -•. . CITY OF RENTON "LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park Mitigation Document ECF;SA;SM-071-88&ECF;SA-109-88 Dear Interested Party: This is to inform you that, under SEPA, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-660, the City of Renton has issued a mitigation document for the Black River Corporate Park Environmental Impact Statement. Copies of the document are available.at the public information counter (SEPA Information Center) in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: First City Development Corp proposes to build a phased project, including three one to four-story office buildings on 12.07 acres of Tract A, and three four to seven-story buildings on the 15.7 acre Tract B. Tract A will also include surface parking to accommodate the buildings on Tract A. Tract B will include the construction of a three- " story parking structure and associated surface parking. The project is located north of Oaksdale Ave&West of Naches&7th. Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., June 17, 1991. See City Code Section 4-8-11,WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21 C.075. Any appeal as to the adequacy of the EIS must be filed with the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the decision was made to issue the mitigation document. All appeals must be received by June 17, 1991,5:00 p.m. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections to either the mitigation document and/or the EIS. 10 If you have any questions about the procedures for either appeal, please contact Mary Lynne Myer at 235- 2550. Ced) Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 . ,., • , . . .. . . • • • — - , ' - . . .... :, •,,,,• i „ CITY OF. RENT ON ,.-;,.. ... --. • -• ,..,., . ...ci,_,_ _. ,- , ., • , ' ' / /42"-- -tri.P.Plitcti7;a1 —;13r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . P[i .-_-,0 - .-L. -, r•P-..,,,':,u_ .70. . ' . , • . . . • 11020:9LT. --I- -::, 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 - . . . . 30 MAY; .... '' - •-• .'il .,. .. . , . .... _../ — . . , r / / John C. Edwards • Betts Patterson & Mines PS . . _ 900 4th Avenue Ctr 40th Fl . • NOT DELqLiiABLE-1 eatt e. WA co RETURN TO WRITER v--.1 '' \1:1---2::9' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiitiII ____ I • . ... ' NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION RENTON,WASHINGTON A Conditional Use Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public.Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: King County Repair Facility CU-055-91 DESCRIPTION: The applicant is seeking a conditional use permit for expansion of the King County Repair Facilities operations by: a) improvements to the existing maintenance administration building, solid waste transfer station, equipment maintenance building and , equipment/material storage building; and b) addition of a materials testing laboratory. GENERAL LOCATION: 155 Monroe Avenue PUBLIC APPROVALS: Conditional Use Permit Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. Ti1 J_ -__ _,__aI , ____-r-r-i---r--I I r—I T.' 1 - 1--1 I I I I r--1-__I r--1 I Y11 R. P1i I _ ; Bll I ._-1 T I -I I _ 1 11 .I.,..,r,,, ' r l 1 1 1 /p r I I 1 11 1i-16i�y L, m � l I II II I = —� II I 1 _1_,L).- --H I B1 1-1---_ Ell 2 li \———— -- =, b1'3/ -- 1",, nu. �i _ _ . .i: ,y74 a —In G1 ,_t.,__,_ 1 �� ..,Il I. I 2.r rl--,I`k,l �,d _ .-f1 I I , 1 I -T I G1 / I 4 I T_ I I / ��1:I ;n„e� ' .,r,,t t,,;��`i�' d I I ; —r 1 I /: - --- Lul LJ i 'li11 4RMwNo. il 1--1"_—. �UlA\1MIIN A,NMmhAN' 7Y-•7-J I; I 4-— .f P,.t,t...,t \I ( I,.:',I,.,;I'll;ii I : x, It; f'II ♦', ;:+F` , :1 1.i-i+ \•• \ e ' Iir} L, 'gilO i '! I I !, 1` I7r1 rtnTITIYITm I r P- r LI I I I II I I ILL 11 1, 7T h J LEGEND /� y / yI r no w,ma,.onox Mili I 1 \ \ BLISHO WI �� LIa„ MM 11 \ / � „),r c KING COUNTY NEIGHBORHOOD i PUBLIC WORKS O DETAIL MAP CONSOLIDATED OFFICE O SCALE I & REPAIR FACILITY. genmalot I.-zoo ARA JACKEON CONDITIONAL USE PERAMT NORTH ARCHITECTS&PLANNERS APPLICATION : PHASE! eu.w.wuvma+w.m MAY 15,1991 CITY OF RENTON '',.-,,?$NTo,,,, ,__.- -Not)179..ot- .._-_—:.&,. ..-s- -..) _. (- Department of Planning/Building/Public Wop,lcs ,s; L r- iv! L,,.; ,------C-'---- - --r-N.":--i •--.- Us POSTAGE ;'..- "= UM' OF RENTON , o5 ATR —1,1AR29 91. 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 NNING DIVISION mg 2 8 1991 . * - I .., . 1 ilETU211 TO SE.NDER, I: f UNABLE TO LOCATE AT BOEING 1' f RECEIVED ---t- REMOVE FROM MAILING LIST A PL -LiAvul k.,\\ • a" li . El REFUSED BY ADDRESSEE .i. 0 l'.T.:::-•G E`JOES P101 ATTEMPT TO I.iiii CEi PO1I. !:.11, 7111191.11111111111.1111MIMili 1 ,..0 NEED CNRECT M : SIC? INFORMATION t I 0 NEED CORRECT POST OFFICE BOX NOT STREET ADDRESS f ; 0 NEED ADDRESSEE'S FULL NAME '--L1 Criligl . ,,. . • - .,....- i .---• I ‘'':'• -•`" c: :froi CITY OF RENTON baL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator March 27, 1991 {, Dear Interested Party: This letter is notification that the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), designated as the SEPA responsible official for the City of Renton, issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Black River Corporate Park, Tracts A and B on March 27, 1991. The proponent is applying for a Building Permit, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, a Clearing, Grading and Filling Permit, Site Plan Approval,and a Routine Vegetation Removal Permit. The FEIS augments the Draft EIS by providing additional research and findings, publishing and answering letters received on the Draft, providing additional mitigation, and incorporating by reference'a number of documents. These documents, listed below with an asterisk (*), may be viewed at the Renton Public Library, Main Branch, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, 98055. All others are available at the Metro Library, Exchange Building, 821 Second Ave. Seattle,98104-1598. 1974. Auburn Interceptor EIS *1980. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins, EIS and Appendices. Report No. 910/9-80-077 1981. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Final EIS on the Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1983. Draft Supplemental EIS for the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report. 1983. Final Supplemental EIS on the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report 1983. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle/Draft and Final EISs, Sludge Management Plan. • *1984. Final Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternative for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1984. Public Comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternatives for the Wastewater Management Plan,Lake Washington/Green River Basins. *1985. Draft EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. *1985. Final EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1986. Final Supplemental EIS for Secondary Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. • 1988. Final Supplemental EIS for West Point Secondary Treatment Facilities. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Black River Corporate Park FEIS Issuance. . March 27, 1991 Page 2 *1991. Draft Supplemental EIS, Metro Treatment Plakat Renton. Additional copies of the Draft and Final Black River Corporate Park Tract A and B EIS are available at the third floor, Municipal Building,200 Mill Avenue, Renton,WA 98055. Each document costs$10.00 plus tax. The City of Renton will not take any official action on this project until the issuance of the Mitigation Document. The Mitigation Document will list the measures necessary to avoid significant adverse impacts on the environment. At the time this document is issued,the official appeal period on the adequacy of the EIS will begin. Under City of Renton Code 4-6-23, an appeal of the FEIS must be made to the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the permit or other approval Is issued. The approval, i.e., underlying governmental action, in this case,the mitigation document. Public hearings on the appeal of the FEIS and/or the land use actions are tentatively scheduled for the week of May 13 through May 20, 1991. When places and dates for the hearings are finalized, public notice will be published in the legal notice section of the Valley Daily News. Mary Lynne Myer, of my staff, is available to answer questions on the hearing dates and process. She may be reached at 235-2550. S ly yours, . Donald K Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator CITY OF RENTON NEWS RELEASE NOTICE OF FEIS ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement on March 27, 1991 on the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII (ECF;SA;SM-071-88 & ECF;SA-109-88). ERC will issue a mitigation measures document on the above project based on information from the DEIS and FEIS on April 1990 and March 1991. Description of Proposal: TRACT A The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from one to four stories. These buildings would provide 183,600 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 800 autos. TRACT B The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from three to seven stories. These buildings would provide 286,200 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 500 autos and another 800 stalls would be provided in a three story parking structure. Location of Proposal: The project site is located on Oakesdale Avenue. Type of SEPA Review: Declaration of Significance, SEPA Scoping, Draft EIS, Public hearing on DEIS, Final EIS. Documents may be examined during regular business. hours at Development.Services, Third Floor, Municipal Building,200 Mill Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section APPEAL: Any appeal as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements, pursuant to WAC 197- 11-68 must be consolidated with an appeal on the agency's decision on the proposed action. The mitigation document is this agency's decision which may be appealed together with the FEIS. These appeals may be filed with the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, by 5:00 PM, 20 days after the issuance of the mitigation document. CITY OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ,',..,:,-1 r, .,-.-=-_---.-F..-.„_L-- :-----------lp ,„ ,r.D NAR29)1 71:3.2...„7, g----p-------&------ , 6 iAF'R • Lc-L.= —!s.k)N,------- ------' 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 ,__,_MAY 2 el _UNAPLE TO LOCATE AT MayOrs Ciypt,c, . D ilVE Fil 1,,IAI::.;.1 List t i 0 REFUSED BY ADDRESSEE .i — - . . . . -- ' — - ------D •Lov-• • • • BOEIN GDOES'NOT ATTEMPT TO rit IVER PERSONAL MAIL I ' '7..) rf}:Tr-T3 MAIL STOP , . - -- i ..__ • 1 tt ntt tOX . , ,..., — • • 4 L.1 1,:::::1 Ac..,,-;;:;a:..7;EE•s Cki. 0 OTiiUi _____.._ - • - -.--,....._,,,._...._ k I i 1.76.1 Wialaart.20,46u..A. yd,,,,,,g,,,Agioa.v.;",,valahae•v•,",,, ,„,„„.... ..1,sta:..,,I.,:e CITY OF RENTON '•� : Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator March 27, 1991 3_A/ Dear Interested Party: This letter is notification that the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), designated as the SEPA responsible official for the City of Renton, issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Black River Corporate Park, Tracts A and B on March 27, 1991. The proponent is applying for a Building Permit, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, a Clearing, Grading and Filling Permit, Site Plan Approval,and a Routine Vegetation Removal Permit. The FEIS augments the Draft EIS by providing additional research and findings, publishing and answering letters received on the Draft, providing additional mitigation, and incorporating by reference a number of documents. These documents, listed below with an asterisk (*), may be viewed at the Renton Public Library, Main Branch, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, 98055. All others are available at the Metro Library, Exchange Building, 821 Second Ave. Seattle, 98104-1598. 1974. Auburn Interceptor EIS *1980. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins, EIS and Appendices. Report No.910/9-80-077 1981. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency- Final EIS on the Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1983. Draft Supplemental EIS for the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report. 1983. Final Supplemental EIS on the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report 1983. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle/Draft and Final EISs, Sludge Management Plan. *1984. Final Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternative for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1984. Public Comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternatives for the Wastewater Management Plan,Lake Washington/Green River Basins. *1985. Draft EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. *1985. Final EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1986. Final Supplemental EIS for Secondary Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. • 1988. Final Supplemental EIS for West Point Secondary Treatment Facilities. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Black River Corporate Park _ FEIS Issuance .. March 27, 1991 Page 2 *1991. Draft Supplemental EIS, Metro Treatment Plarltt3at Renton. Additional copies of the Draft and Final Black River Corporate Park Tract A and B EIS are available at the third floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue, Renton,WA 98055. Each document costs$10.00 plus tax. The City of Renton will not take any official action on this project until the issuance of the Mitigation Document. The Mitigation Document will list the measures necessary to avoid significant adverse impacts on the environment. At the time this document is issued,the official appeal period on the adequacy of the EIS will begin. Under City of Renton Code 4-6-23, an appeal of the FEIS must be made to the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the permit or other approval is issued. The approval, i.e., underlying governmental action, in this case,the mitigation document. Public hearings on the appeal of the FEIS and/or the land use actions are tentatively_scheduled for the - week of May 13 through May 20, 1991. When places and dates for the hearings are finalized, public notice will be published in the legal notice section of the Valley Daily News. Mary Lynne Myer, of my staff, is available to answer questions on the hearing dates and process. She may be reached at 235-2550. S' ly yours, Donald K Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator CITY OF RENTON NEWS RELEASE NOTICE OF FEIS ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement on March 27, 1991 on the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII (ECF;SA;SM-071-88 & ECF;SA-109-88). ERC will issue a mitigation measures document on the above project based on information from the DEIS and FEIS on April 1990 and March 1991. Description of Proposal: TRACT A The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from one to four stories. These buildings would provide 183,600 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 800 autos. TRACT B The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from three to seven stories. These buildings would provide 286,200 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 500 autos and another 800 stalls would be provided in a three story parking structure. Location of Proposal: The project site is located on Oakesdale Avenue. Type of SEPA Review: Declaration of Significance, SEPA Scoping, Draft EIS, Public hearing on DEIS, Final EIS. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at Development Services, Third Floor, Municipal Building,200 Mill Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section APPEAL: Any appeal as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements, pursuant to WAC 197- 11-68 must be consolidated with an appeal on the agency's decision on the proposed action. The mitigation document is this agency's decision which may be appealed together with the FEIS. These appeals may be filed with the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, by 5:00 PM, 20 days after the issuance of the mitigation document. CITY OF RENTON ..livirdici, ,--\,, ,..-----.,__,--....— ,,—z—__-_,_, , 7 \ 1--2Qyx-,----_,;-u.s.posTAGEkt- - ( COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • MAI 28 9i 7_--_'-jr_l_cl-_,,,S.,1::1.s.,,::,..C:2.... g r.,...c/ . ,..,... - . 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 NA S IA• '7a_ k r'9.:_h.1216:, * f' , • Surlina-ton Northern , Inc . -1 ---‘N) 1 208 Centr,a1 -31c1g 5310 3rd Ave ac' 04 .,— ..1 m7 OELPid -) . . ._Ry UNABLE TO FU CRT,——.----1/...4 6- 44 (I -1"1 I •- :- • • it t 1 t nu t 1 It I '::,.'-=!..."' •,., RETURN TO WRITER j _ . . ,. . -4 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park Mitigation Document ECF;SA;SM-071-88&ECF;SA-109-88 Dear Interested Party: This is to inform you that, under SEPA, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC .197-11-660, the City of Renton has issued a mitigation document for the Black River Corporate Park Environmental Impact Statement. Copies of the document are available at the public information counter (SEPA Information Center) in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: First City Development Corp proposes to build a phased project, including three one to four-story office buildings on 12.07 acres of Tract A, and three four to seven-story buildings on the 15.7 acre Tract B. Tract A will also include surface parking to accommodate the buildings on Tract A. Tract B will include the construction of a three- story parking structure and associated surface parking. The project is located north of Oaksdale Ave&West of Naches&7th. Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., June 17, 1991. See City Code Section 4-8-1.1,WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21 C.075. Any appeal as to the adequacy of the EIS must be filed with the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the decision was made to issue the mitigation document. All appeals must be received by June 17, 1991, 5:00 p.m. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections to either the mitigation document and/or the EIS. If you have any questions about the procedures for either appeal, please contact Mary Lynne Myer at 235- 2550. rzA, Donald K. Erickson,AICP . Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON a=WTQ4 VI 11. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT t . ,v i !%jam MAY 28 91 = I `'? ` '^�j 5 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 -�j f! A� �,� y r90021 2 (- �_ — City of Sa<<t t1e 821 end Ave _ Se_ttleo WA 9- 104 �S 4i)xRESSFD — ' i6�,;,1 vn ----) 7 ._-__{L YV V 7 RE?URN TO WRITEk -'7 `�� Il1I111t1I 1 illlliiiilliliiillilitiiilI;1111i:l1ill P CITY OF RENTON NIL " 'A Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park Mitigation Document ECF;SA;SM-071-88&ECF;SA-109-88 Dear Interested Party: This is to inform you that, under SEPA, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-660, the City of Renton has issued a mitigation document for the Black River Corporate Park Environmental Impact Statement. Copies of the document are available at the public information counter (SEPA Information Center) in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: First City Development Corp proposes to build a phased project, including three one to four-story office buildings on 12.07 acres of Tract A, and three four to seven-story buildings on the 15.7 acre Tract B. Tract A will also include surface parking to accommodate the buildings on Tract A. Tract B will include the construction of a three- story parking structure and associated surface parking. The project is located north of Oaksdale Ave&West of Naches&7th. Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., June 17, 1991. See City Code Section 4-8-11,WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21 C.075. Any appeal as to the adequacy of the EIS must be filed with the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the decision was made to issue the mitigation document. All appeals must be received by June 17, 1991, 5:00 p.m. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections to either the mitigation document and/or the EIS. If you have any questions about the procedures for either appeal, please contact Mary Lynne Myer at 235- 2550. 44,ui Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 .__ . _... CITY OF RENTON iii,ii T Nis. - ‘%.`--2.9;-"=-•.._..1C---7----1:1-- : C:-V\•F- ---U.S. ( \ POSDZSEPO ----' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 44,---a.......,..... flAY 28 ,"—•^%.....:, ,i•i.f''(,.Y,1.,' A.a. * . Sterkyo -r. WA Skk• \-- 7.,,l.:?, E.m E 7 Ei R-- sz * : 'NV i' / U . S . D.O . E . . Terrence G . Estelt, Mgr . Puget Sound Area Office PO Box C-10030 Seattle , wA 93109-1030 ( '-- -- — c CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park Mitigation Document ECF;SA;SM-071-88&ECF;SA-109-88 Dear Interested Party: This is to inform you that, under SEPA, RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-660, the City of Renton has issued a mitigation document for the Black River Corporate Park Environmental Impact Statement. Copies of the document are available at the public information counter (SEPA Information Center) in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: First City Development Corp proposes to build a phased project, including three one to four-story office buildings on 12.07 acres of Tract A, and three four to seven-story buildings on the 15.7 acre Tract B. Tract A will also include surface parking to accommodate the buildings on Tract A. Tract B will include the construction of a three- story parking structure and associated surface parking. The project is located north of Oaksdale Ave&West of Naches&7th. Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., June 17, 1991. See City Code Section 4-8-11,WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21 C.075. Any appeal as to the adequacy of the EIS must be filed with the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the decision was made to issue the mitigation document. All appeals must be received by June 17, 1991,5:00 p.m. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections to either the mitigation document and/or the EIS. If you have any questions about the procedures for either appeal, please contact Mary Lynne Myer at 235- 2550. Si I , Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON NTON\. __ U.S. �•` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ( rlAi 23 11 �y' it 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 , =. , � n j�f L?Cp`�-- x ,, ,. l'R S N ,, ‘ 1 9 00 216 2 * " 5 -0 V� (--- i WILLTAM J. H CK R 2 341 5 SE 264 Map12 Va119Y, WA 98038 - INOT DEI .E,�� t j i'S ADL., � 15. $ .; :.. __,,, ) iVrJAKE T O i RITwu a - Q. 1,4 d sy i,„,,;: RETURN r0 WRITER "11 .3--\ IIr1aelarl, ,a,rr,il, ,r a,tEasla,i„ri,l,fis, „d CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park Mitigation Document ECF;SA;SM-071-88&ECF;SA-109-88 4111 Dear Interested Party: This is to inform you that, under SEPA. RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-660, the City of Renton has issued a mitigation document for the Black River Corporate Park Environmental Impact Statement. Copies of the document are available at the public information counter (SEPA Information Center) in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above 111 address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: First City Development Corp proposes to build a phased project, including three one to four-story office buildings on 12.07 acres of Tract A, and three four to seven-story buildings on the 15.7 acre Tract B. Tract A will also include surface parking to accommodate the buildings on Tract A. Tract B will include the construction of a three- story parking structure and associated surface parking. The project is located north of Oaksdale Ave&West of Naches&7th. Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., June 17, 1991. See City Code Section 4-8-11,WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21 C.075. Any appeal as to the adequacy of the EIS must be filed with the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the decision was made to issue the mitigation document. All appeals must be received by June 17, 1991, 5:00 p.m. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections to either the mitigation document and/or the EIS. If you have any questions about the procedures for either appeal, please contact Mary Lynne Myer at 235- 2550. C:1=5 „owdi . Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Al 1. CITY OF RENTON - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT _ ; r ^ g ��.�'' s 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 �- ? __ b Fdrf����-tLf �A��� '�••s ..�. p�'' ,-..�-71'71 'S � 9;��:r1Er.2 �` 1. Pt��1��x og, Susan cC1e11 n ----- ,� 14001 Northwest PI NW Seattle , t•JA ':: 155 Vol DEL, _::: I. �\ ' Rll l lll lluttltlrsttlEliiriieatE?URN TO WRITER s.-'`)) CITY OF RENTON '.u. `' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park Mitigation Document ECF;SA;SM-071-88&ECF;SA-109-88 Dear Interested Party: This is to inform you that, under SEPA, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-660, the City of Renton has issued a mitigation document for the Black River Corporate Park Environmental Impact Statement. Copies of the document are available at the public information counter (SEPA Information Center) in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: First City Development Corp proposes to build a phased project, including three one to four-story office buildings on 12.07 acres of Tract A, and three four to seven-story buildings on the 15.7 acre Tract B. Tract A will also include surface parking to accommodate the buildings on Tract A. Tract B will include the construction of a three- story parking structure and associated surface parking. The project is located north of Oaksdale Ave&West of Naches&7th. Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., June 17, 1991. See City Code Section 4-8-11,WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21 C.075. Any appeal as to the adequacy of the EIS must be filed with the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the decision was made to issue the mitigation document. All appeals must be received by June 17, 1991, 5:00 p.m. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections to either the mitigation document and/or the EIS. If you have any questions about the procedures for either appeal, please contact Mary Lynne Myer at 235- 2550. Clf) Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 r 1 CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT __ r1AY 10 91 e^�--7 ;, ^ �_ N'i 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 ��. j a cast Jn I1MME7En-• s , , // . Pi 5 g • 7/ Katny . tt'l1kin5 \ 4258 , 37th Ave. i,J r_R _ . ._ Se,t, le , WA 96' 199 i rrSL ..)I� --- -__ ,,, .war,%,''"'� Il • l - Fi 1661 1 NUME. .R� _ — ------ -- �/ I' �1,1 ci i i i i{ .11�r�v �y f SENDER �J� ~ iiifiiiiiiiiiiiiIiiilliiniliili %` .y CITY OF RENTON _ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 10, 1991 • SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII Final Environmental Impact Statement Dear Recipient/Party of Interest: The Black River Final Environmental Impact Statement included a section on cumulative impacts, reflecting the potential for development of several projects in the vicinity of the Corporate Park. These projects included the projected expansion of the Metro Wastewater Treatment Facility. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement for this project was released just prior to the Black River FEIS. The Final EIS included erroneous information which necessitates a revision. This letter documents that revision. Attached, please find an errata sheet for this item. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call 235-2550. MI, 4 it. 441L... Donald K. Erickson,AICP Principal Planner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ERRATA SHEET Please substitute the following paragraph for Paragraph 3, page 3-62 in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII. Offensive odors could occasionally be generated from the treatment facility and extend beyond the boundaries of the site, even with Metro's proposed odor control plan. These odors most likely would come from mechanical failures, emergencies or system upsets, or, infrequently, unusual circumstances during day-to-day operations. These odors have the greatest potential for crossing Tracts A and B when the prevailing winds are from the south and southwest. • ‘-, \ ANNIN DIVISION CITY OF RENT ON - uS POSTAGED Department of Planning/Building/Public Works PLCITY OF GRENTON 1 MAR29 91 1 "It-g'------i:v____.. i,r,-, n -- •U.. 1 A 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 1 I MAY 1 4 1991 ivAsIA. L<—.4 t F r4E0T21t2- : : : RECEivED .-.-,:!---.,- LeAnn T . LeFond '4, 1 411 . Ge-ant Ave S, #G103ed, 570,6-t Renton, WA 98055 1-........ ....V•g..O.. ...d,..O.+.i.A..X...U..,0.1.21..40.3..........,•••.•74 1'174- 110T DELIVERABLE // ,.,, .11_ 'AODPESSED 0;° 166 1 t9 ';iY, ' : 3LE TO FORVVARD -?—1 , 01 AV 01 rri ,, .3-0-'' ..:,.' ...0 4- IN d ,„.; 01TIJRN TO VIRITFR 4 11111111thiluiffiluithifililluitibmifilittlit t% ?: CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator March 27, 1991 Dear Interested Party: This letter is notification that the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), designated as the SEPA responsible official for the City of Renton, issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Black River Corporate Park, Tracts A and B on March 27, 1991. The proponent is applying for a Building Permit, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, a Clearing, Grading and Filling Permit, Site Plan Approval,and a Routine Vegetation Removal Permit. The FEIS augments the Draft EIS by providing additional research and findings, publishing and answering letters received on the Draft, providing additional mitigation, and incorporating by reference a number of documents. These documents, listed below with an asterisk (*), may be viewed at the Renton Public Library, Main Branch, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, 98055. All others are available at the Metro Library, Exchange Building, 821 Second Ave. Seattle, 98104-1598. 1974. Auburn Interceptor EIS *1980. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins, EIS and Appendices. Report No.910/9-80-077 1981. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency- Final EIS on the Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1983. Draft Supplemental EIS for the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report. 1983. Final Supplemental EIS on the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report 1983. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle/Draft and Final EISs, Sludge Management Plan. *1984. Final Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternative for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1984. Public Comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternatives for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. *1985. Draft EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. *1985. Final EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1986. Final Supplemental EIS for Secondary Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1988. Final Supplemental EIS for West Point Secondary Treatment Facilities. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Black River Corporate Park FEIS Issuance March 27, 1991 Page 2 I *1991. Draft Supplemental EIS, Metro Treatment Plant at Renton. Additional copies of the Draft and Final Black River Corporate Park Tract A and B EIS are avails, le at the third floor, Municipal Building,200 Mill Avenue, Renton,WA 98055. Each document costs$10.00 plus tax. The City of Renton will not take any official action on this project until the issuance of the Mitigation Document. The Mitigation Document will list the measures necessary to avoid significant adverse impacts on the environment. At the time this document is issued,the official appeal period on the adequacy of the EIS will begin. Under City of Renton Code 4-6-23, an appeal of the FEIS must be made to the:Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the permit or other approval is issued. The approval, i.e., underlying governmental action, in this case,the mitigation document. Public hearings on the appeal of the FEIS and/or the land use actions are tentatively scheduled for the week of May 13 through May 20, 1991. When places and dates for the hearings are finalized, public notice will be published in the legal notice section of the Valley Daily News. Mary Lynne Myer, of my staff, is available to answer questions on the hearing dates and process. She may be reached at 235-2550. S I yours, Eloii Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator I i• CITY OF RENTON NEWS RELEASE NOTICE OF FEIS ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement on March 27, 1991 on the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII (ECF;SA;SM-071-88& ECF;SA-109-88). ERC will issue a mitigation measures document on the above project based on information from the DEIS and FEIS on April 1990 and March 1991. Description of Proposal: TRACT A The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from one to four stories. These buildings would provide 183,600 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 800 autos. TRACT B The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from three to seven stories. These buildings would provide 286,200 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 500 autos and another 800 stalls would be provided in a three story parking structure. Location of Proposal: The project site is located on Oakesdale Avenue. Type of SEPA Review: Declaration of Significance, SEPA Scoping, Draft EIS, Public hearing on DEIS, Final EIS. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at Development Services, Third Floor, Municipal Building,200 Mill Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section APPEAL: Any appeal as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements, pursuant to WAC 197- 11-68 must be consolidated with an appeal on the agency's decision on the proposed action. The mitigation document is this agency's decision which may be appealed together with the FEIS. These appeals may be filed with the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, by 5:00 PM, 20 days after the issuance of the mitigation document. • CITY OF RENTON ?S�TGN a-J �-a �\ - u.s.t'c�s rtic��y, Department of Planning/Building/Public Works LAB QIVI 101 =:1 ti ,��, 200 Mill AvenueCITY REN Ntz I~�,L ,}) South -Renton, Washington 98055 Lc CMET E RJ * * $ . 1991 � + j 9002162 * a ECEWED Mary M. Anderson ir 7.&4,-L.1 13618 SE 180th. Renton. WA 98058 NOT DELIVERABLE _ NU Y t ,;9Y�1vi�a Y ii L4 4� lfy 48. AS ADDRESSED - 1'1 '� `a' 'UNABLE TO FGRWARD t\-..:66) . aJ clyyRE7UAN TO SENDER 7 � � 41 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator March 27, 1991 Dear Interested Party: This letter is notification that the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), designated as the SEPA responsible official for the City of Renton, Issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Black River Corporate Park, Tracts A and B on March 27, 1991. The proponent is applying for a Building Permit, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, a Clearing, Grading and Filling Permit, Site Plan Approval,and a Routine Vegetation Removal Permit. The FEIS augments the Draft EIS by providing additional research and findings, publishing and answering letters received on the Draft, providing additional mitigation, and incorporating by reference a number of documents. These documents, listed below with an asterisk (*), may be viewed at the Renton Public Library, Main Branch, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, 98055. All others are available at the.Metro Library, Exchange Building, 821 Second Ave. Seattle, 98104-1598. 1974. Auburn Interceptor EIS *1980. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins, EIS and Appendices. Report No.910/9-80-077 1981. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency- Final EIS on the Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1983. Draft Supplemental EIS for the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report. 1983. Final Supplemental EIS on the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report 1983. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle/Draft and Final EISs, Sludge Management Plan. *1984. Final Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternative for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1984. Public Comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternatives for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. *1985. Draft EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. *1985. Final EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1986. Final Supplemental EIS for Secondary Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1988. Final Supplemental EIS for West Point Secondary Treatment Facilities. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Black River Corporate Park FEIS Issuance March 27, 1991 Page 2 *1991. Draft Supplemental EIS, Metro Treatment Plant at Renton. Additional copies of the Draft and Final Black River Corporate Park Tract A and B EIS are available at the third floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue, Renton,WA 98055. Each document costs$10.00 plus tax. l The City of Renton will not take any official action on this project until the issuance of the Mitigation Document. The Mitigation Document will list the measures necessary to avoid significant adverse impacts on the environment. At the time this document is issued,the official appeal period on the adequacy of the EIS will begin. Under City of Renton Code 4-6-23, an appeal of the FEIS must be made to the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the permit or other approval is issued. The approval, i.e., underlying governmental action, in this case,the mitigation document. Public hearings on the appeal of the FEIS and/or the land use actions are tentatively scheduled for the week of May 13 through May 20, 1991. When places and dates for the hearings are finalized, public notice will be published in the legal notice section of the Valley Daily News. Mary Lynne Myer, of my staff, is available to answer questions on the hearing dates and process. She may be reached at 235-2550. S' ly yours, Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator 11. I Ii CITY OF RENTON NEWS RELEASE NOTICE OF FEIS ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement on March 27, 1991 on the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII (ECF;SA;SM-071-88 & ECF;SA-109-88). ERC will issue a mitigation measures document on the above project based on information from the DEIS and FEIS on April 1990 and March 1991. Description of Proposal: TRACT A The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from one to four stories. •These buildings would provide 183,600 square feet of • space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 800 autos. TRACT B The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from three to seven stories. These buildings would provide 286,200 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 500 autos and another 800 stalls would be provided in a three story parking structure. Location of Proposal: The project site is located on Oakesdale Avenue. Type of SEPA Review: Declaration of Significance, SEPA Scoping, Draft EIS, Public hearing on DEIS, Final EIS. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at Development Services, Third Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section APPEAL: Any appeal as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements, pursuant to WAC 197- 11-68 must be consolidated with an appeal on the agency's decision on the proposed action. The mitigation document is this agency's decision which may be appealed together with the FEIS. These appeals may be filed with the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, by 5:00 PM, 20 days after the issuance of the mitigation document. 1 i r / '' ,, ' —• \ ' \ ' CITY (01, RENTON iteNT04, s'-' -. ..:-...,-- .-, .... U.S PCISTAGCA.,5) 2 ---\_. Department of Planning/Building/Public Works -, L=i •7-=-•77- n n b1-; tIAR29 '91 02 • itio,:\ '11 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 1 r ' WASH. I 9002162 * * A lernrva --) I 0 • • v 1 ' i6 ci:7:1 cirri /0 CZtil. REASON CHECKED - -- - -- -- - - - 0 Unclaimed Refused— Acofey‘ C. e tci-e. Unknown - Insufficient addresS ---= . No such post office in PA te .- Do not remail in this erwoofgo — LI -. - -- --,- ...4-":„?. , ,... E,rigu. .. s..„ i %..... - \ v • v.. CITY OF RENTON aril • Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator March 27, 1991 Dear Interested Party: This letter is notification that the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), designated as the SEPA responsible official for the City of Renton, issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Black River Corporate Park, Tracts A and B on March 27, 1991. The proponent is applying for a Building Permit, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, a Clearing, Grading and Filling Permit, Site Plan Approval, and a Routine Vegetation Removal Permit. The FEIS augments the Draft EIS by providing additional research and findings, publishing and answering letters received on the Draft, providing additional mitigation, and incorporating by reference a number of documents. These documents, listed below with an asterisk (*), may be viewed at the Renton Public Library, Main Branch, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, 98055. All others are available at the Metro Library, Exchange Building, 821 Second Ave. Seattle, 98104-1598. 1974. Auburn Interceptor EIS *1980. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins, EIS and Appendices. Report No. 910/9-80-077 1981. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency- Final EIS on the Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1983. Draft Supplemental EIS for the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report. 1983. Final Supplemental EIS on the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report 1983. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle/Draft and Final EISs, Sludge Management Plan. *1984. Final Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternative for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1984. Public Comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternatives for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. *1985. Draft EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. *1985. Final EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1986. Final Supplemental EiS for Secondary Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. • 1988. Final Supplemental EIS for West Point Secondary Treatment Facilities. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Black River Corporate Park • FEIS Issuance March 27, 1991 Page 2 *1991. Draft Supplemental EIS, Metro Treatment Plai t{tat Renton. Additional copies of the Draft and Final Black River Corporate Park Tract A and B EIS are available at the third floor, Municipal Building,200 Mill Avenue, Renton,WA 98055. Each document costs$10.00 plus tax. The City of Renton will not take any official action on this project until the issuance of the Mitigation Document. The Mitigation Document will list the measures necessary to avoid significant adverse impacts on the environment. At the time this document is issued,the official appeal period on the adequacy of the EIS will begin. Under City of Renton Code 4-6-23, an appeal of the FEIS must be made to the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the permit or other approval is issued. The approval, i.e., underlying governmental action, in this case,the mitigation document. Public hearings on the.appeal of the FEIS and/or the land use actions are tentatively scheduled for the week of May 13 through May 20, 1991. When places and dates for the hearings are finalized, public notice will be published in the legal notice section of the Valley Daily News. Mary Lynne Myer, of my staff, is available to answer questions on the hearing dates and process. She may be reached at 235-2550. nymrs, Donald K Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator I I i I II iI I' II CITY OF RENTON NEWS RELEASE NOTICE OF FEIS ISS- UANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement on March 27, 1991 on the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII (ECF;SA;SM-071-88& ECF;SA-109-88). ERC will issue a ' mitigation measures document on the above project based on information from the DEIS and FEIS on April 1990 and March 1991. Description of.Proposal: TRACT A The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from one to four stories. These buildings would provide 183,600 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 800 autos. TRACT B The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from three to seven stories. These buildings would provide 286,200 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 500 autos and another 800 stalls would be provided in a three story parking structure. Location of Proposal: The project site is located on Oakesdale Avenue. Type of SEPA Review: Declaration of Significance, SEPA Scoping, Draft EIS, Public hearing on DEIS, Final EIS. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at Development Services, Third Floor, Municipal Building,200 Mill Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section APPEAL: Any appeal as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements, pursuant to WAC 197- 11-68 must be consolidated with an appeal on the agency's decision on the proposed action. The mitigation document is this agency's decision which may be appealed together with the FEIS. These appeals may be filed with the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, by 5:00 PM, 20 days after the issuance of the mitigation document. ' 542'''''''''''' ', e•....nv.10'• ''•••:-;•.2,-.K.,, .. • -:5--7,1_,'1'. .,,, (1? CITY OF RENTON o). ----, ,,f• )epartment of Planning/Building/Public Works ‘,--- \ • ,R129 41 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 i it ! * , cmETER— , re WA Skk• ,,—.., k 1 -9002162 * * A ill 6,V 4:.: , *--e A Torr/..46ed://-::-L-) p It iistp0.41116411:411:01°%....,.°1 ."..."-P -17- in r _.. _ 99 ._ ielo. tA). clams .3v- (06 1 Btail"c1+- ti/e GEV -kun 1.04 '&055 RE, % . . NI 0 1 DELIVERABLF. ----;;:------1 ' UNABLE TO FORWARD '''' . t, v , 6 W (1 • RETURN TO WRITER Th., 41 -3 ).• ,.: at CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator March 27, 1991 Dear Interested Party: This letter is notification that the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), designated as the SEPA responsible official for the City of Renton, issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Black River Corporate Park, Tracts A and B on March 27, 1991. The proponent is applying for a Building Permit, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, a Clearing, Grading and Filling Permit, Site Plan Approval,and a Routine Vegetation Removal Permit. The FEIS augments the Draft EIS by providing additional research and findings, publishing and answering letters received on the Draft, providing additional mitigation, and incorporating by reference a number of documents. These documents, listed below with an asterisk (*), may be viewed at the Renton Public Library, Main Branch, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, 98055. All others are available at the Metro Library, Exchange Building, 821 Second Ave. Seattle, 98104-1598. 1974. Auburn Interceptor EIS *1980. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins, EIS and Appendices. Report No.910/9-80-077 1981. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Final EIS on the Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1983. Draft Supplemental EIS for the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report. 1983. Final Supplemental EIS on the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report 1983. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle/Draft and Final ElSs, Sludge Management Plan. *1984. Final Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternative for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1984. Public Comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternatives for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. *1985. Draft EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. *1985. Final EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1986. Final Supplemental EIS for Secondary Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. • 1988. Final Supplemental EIS for West Point Secondary Treatment Facilities. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Black River Corporate Park • FEIS Issuance f March 27, 1991 Page 2 *1991. Draft Supplemental EIS, Metro Treatment Plaiikit Renton. Additional copies of the Draft and Final Black River Corporate Park Tract A and B EIS are available at the third floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue, Renton,WA 98055. Each document costs$10.00 plus tax. The City of Renton will not take any official action on this project until the issuance of the Mitigation Document. The Mitigation Document will list the measures necessary to avoid significant adverse impacts on the environment. At the time this document is issued,the official appeal period on the adequacy of the EIS will begin. Under City of Renton Code 4-6-23, an appeal of the FEIS must be made to the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the permit or other approval is issued. The approval, i.e., underlying governmental action, in this case,the mitigation document. I for hearings on the appeal of the FEIS and/or the land use actions are tentatively scheduled the week of May 13 through May 20, 1991. When places and dates for the hearings are finalized, public notice will be published in the legal notice section of the Valley Daily News. Mary Lynne Myer, of my staff, is available to answer questions on the hearing dates and process. She may be reached at 235-2550. S' ly yours, t 1,1401) Donald K Erickson,AICP I' Zoning Administrator _ - . I, CITY OF RENTON NEWS RELEASE NOTICE OF FEIS ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement on March 27, 1991 on the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII (ECF;SA;SM-071-88 & ECF;SA-109-88). ERC will issue a mitigation measures document on the above project based on information from the DEIS and FEIS on April 1990 and March 1991. Description of Proposal: TRACT A The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from one to four stories. These buildings would provide 183,600 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 800 autos: TRACT B The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from three to seven stories. These buildings would provide 286,200 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 500 autos and another 800 stalls would be provided in a three story parking structure. Location of Proposal: The project site is located on Oakesdale Avenue. Type of SEPA Review: Declaration of Significance, SEPA Scoping, Draft EIS, Public hearing on DEIS, Final EIS. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at Development Services, Third Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section APPEAL: Any appeal as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements, pursuant to WAC 197- 11-68 must be consolidated with an appeal on the agency's decision on the proposed action. The mitigation document is this agency's decision which may be appealed together with the FEIS. These appeals may be filed with the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, by 5:00 PM, 20 days after the issuance of the mitigation document --\i CITY OF RENTON oliroy. v ��� `'a l ( U.S.POSrtiGE 57� a ',Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ti P „ 'r f ' . MAR29 91 c ti !C� 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 :'' WASN• , AAETER-J n * a • U I F9002162 * * A l NlNG DIVISION athy l.lkins p OFFtENTON K 4258 137th Ave W GOSeattC�le. WA 98199 q A(7.91 L • • I 'NOT DELIVERABLE:. • — AS ADDRESSED. �' 18�I . li "ii UNABLE TO FORWARD` • -• 6. N d , fi i d �[� f ; f i ! !! tltt ! ! tst at RETURN: .O WRITER _- '74 ,3.- _ . CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator March 27, 1991 Dear Interested Party: This letter is notification that the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), designated as the SEPA responsible official for the City of Renton, issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Black River Corporate Park, Tracts A and B on March 27, 1991. The proponent is applying for a Building Permit, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, a Clearing, Grading and Filling Permit, Site Plan Approval, and a Routine Vegetation Removal Permit. The FEIS augments the Draft EIS by providing additional research and findings, publishing and answering letters received on the Draft, providing additional mitigation, and incorporating-by reference a number of documents. These documents, listed below with an asterisk (*), may be viewed at the Renton Public Library, Main Branch, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, 98055. All others are available at the Metro Library, Exchange Building, 821 Second Ave. Seattle, 98104-1598. 1974. Auburn Interceptor EIS *1980. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins, EIS and Appendices. Report No.910/9-80-077 1981. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Final EIS on the Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1983. Draft Supplemental EIS for the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report. 1983. Final Supplemental EIS on the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report 1983. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency .Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle/Draft and Final EISs, Sludge Management Plan. *1984. Final Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternative for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1984. Public Comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternatives for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. *1985. Draft EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. *1985. Final EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1986. Final Supplemental EIS for Secondary Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1988. Final Supplemental EIS for West Point Secondary Treatment Facilities. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Ii Black River Corporate ParkII FEIS Issuance I March 27, 1991 Page 2 III a'f *1991. Draft Supplemental EIS, Metro Treatment Plant.�at Renton. I Additional copies of the Draft and Final Black River Corporate Park Tract A and B EIS are available at the third floor, Municipal Building,200 Mill Avenue, Renton,WA 98055. Each document costs$10.00 plus tax. The City of Renton will not take any official action on this project until the issuance of the Mitigation Document. The Mitigation Document will list the measures necessary to avoid significant adverse impacts on the environment. At the time this document is issued,the official appeal period on the adequacy of the EIS will begin. Under City of Renton Code 4-6-23, an appeal of the FEIS must be made to the Hearing ;1 Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the permit or other approval is issued. The approval, i.e., underlying governmental action, in this case,the mitigation document. Public hearings on the appeal of the FEIS and/or the land use actions are tentatively scheduled for the week.of..May_13:through.May.20,-1991. When places and dates for the hearings are finalized, public notice will be published in the legal notice section of the Valley Daily News. Mary Lynne Myer, of my staff, is I I available to answer questions on the hearing dates and process. She may be reached at 235-2550. S' ly yours, t Ego, , I I iI Donald K Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator 1 1 _ �I 1 II 11 . l ,I 1 CITY OF RENTON NEWS RELEASE NOTICE OF FEIS ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement on March 27, 1991 on the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII (ECF;SA;SM-071-88 & ECF;SA-109-88). ERC will issue a mitigation measures document on the above project based on information from the DEIS and FEIS on April 1990 and March 1991. Description of Proposal: TRACT A The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in.height from one to four stories. These ..buildings would provide 183,600 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 800 autos. TRACT B The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from three to seven stories. These buildings would provide 286,200 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 500 autos and another 800 stalls would be provided in a three story parking structure. Location of Proposal: The project site is located on Oakesdale Avenue. Type of SEPA Review: Declaration of Significance, SEPA Scoping, Draft EIS, Public hearing on DEIS, Final EIS. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at Development Services, Third Floor, Municipal Building,200 Mill Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section APPEAL: Any appeal as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements, pursuant to WAC 197- 11-68 must be consolidated with an appeal on the agency's decision on the proposed action. The mitigation document is this agency's decision which may be appealed together with the FEIS. These appeals may be filed with the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, by 5:00 PM, 20 days after the issuance of the mitigation document. CITY OF RENTON US POSTAGP' '• (C-N_ • • \ Department of Planning/Building/Public Works itr MAR29 .91 n u ZOO Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 Y A PLANNING • I CITY OF RENTON APR - 5 1991 RECEIVED City of Seattle. 821 2nd Ave Seattle, WA 98104 CITY821A 981042003 1889 04/03/91 FORWARDING TIME EXPIRED :SEATTLE COMBINED UTILITIES 710 2ND AVE #11FLR SEATTLE WA q8104-1712 RETURN TO SENDER 4. CITY OF RENTON • Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator March 27, 1991 Dear Interested Party: This letter is notification that the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), designated as the SEPA responsible official for the City of Renton, issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Black River Corporate Park, Tracts A and B on March 27, 1991. The proponent is applying for a Building Permit, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, a Clearing, Grading and Filling Permit, Site Plan Approval, and a-Routine Vegetation Removal Permit. The FEIS augments the Draft EIS by providing additional research and findings, publishing and answering letters received on the Draft, providing additional mitigation, and incorporating by reference a number of documents. These documents, listed below with an asterisk (*), may be viewed at the Renton Public Library, Main Branch, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, 98055. All others are available at the Metro Library, Exchange Building, 821 Second Ave. Seattle, 98104-1598. , 1974. Auburn Interceptor EIS *1980. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins, EIS and Appendices. Report No. 910/9-80-077 1981. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency- Final EIS on the Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1983. Draft Supplemental EIS for the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report. 1983. Final Supplemental EIS on the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report 1983. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle/Draft and Final EISs, Sludge Management Plan. *1984. Final Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternative for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1984. Public Comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS'on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternatives for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. *1985. Draft EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. *1985. Final EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1986. Final Supplemental EIS for Secondary Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1988. Final Supplemental EIS for West Point Secondary Treatment Facilities. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 11 lu Black River Corporate Park FEIS Issuance March 27, 1991 Page 2 *1991. Draft Supplemental EIS, Metro Treatment Plant at Renton. Additional copies of the Draft and Final Black River Corporate Park Tract A and B EIS are available at the third floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue, Renton,WA 98055. Each document costs$10.00 plus tax. The City of Renton will not take any official action on this project until the issuance of the Mitigation Document. The Mitigation Document will list the measures necessary to avoid significant adverse impacts on the environment. At the time this document is issued,the official appeal period on the adequacy of the EIS will begin. Under City of Renton Code 4-6-23, an appeal of the FEIS must be made to the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the permit or other approval is issued. The approval, i.e., underlying governmental action, in this case,the mitigation document. Public hearings on the appeal of the FEIS and/or the land use actions are tentatively scheduled for the week of May 13 through May 20, 1991. When places and dates for the hearings are finalized, public notice - will be published in the legal notice section of the Valley Daily News. Mary Lynne Myer, of my staff, is available to answer questions on the hearing dates and process. She may be reached at 235-2550. S' ly yours, Egi Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator le I li CITY OF RENTON NEWS RELEASE NOTICE OF FEIS ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement on March 27, 1991 on the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII (ECF;SA;SM-071-88 & ECF;SA-109-88). ERC will issue a mitigation measures document on the above project based on information from the DEIS and FEIS on April 1990 and March 1991. Description of Proposal: TRACT A The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from one to four stories. These buildings would provide 183,600 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 800 autos. TRACT B The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from three to seven stories. These buildings would provide 286,200 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 500 autos and another 800 stalls would be provided in a three story parking structure. Location of Proposal: The project site is located on Oakesdale Avenue. Type of SEPA Review: Declaration of Significance, SEPA Scoping, Draft EIS, Public hearing on DEIS, Final EIS. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at Development Services, Third Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section APPEAL: Any appeal as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements, pursuant to WAC 197- 11-68 must be consolidated with an appeal on the agency's decision on the proposed action. The mitigation document is this agency's decision which may be appealed together with the FEIS. These appeals may be filed with the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, by 5:00 PM, 20 days after the issuance of the mitigation document. CITY OF RENTON RL.TON �, U.S.POSTAGETy� a" )epartment of Planning/Building/Public Works \0 IPA 4 H10Sio N1O14 MAR29 9{ I r 0,2 5 ic,; 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98053'�'�OF - / ), G r ,, TO sj}g(CLARtiEL�-_uta(t4 G�to .., cis_- DEL A ADDR_ _ ____ Barbara Fa i le itEFUSELl--��2L VACANT----- I�E�sEF ADD - 14300 5c th, #N5 ~T '�_--ITT -- Renton, A 98058 RtCEPT ACL .(.53sy j V tt•N' I t fDoREssEE4cri i 6ad� ) [RETURN T 0 SENDER t �G- d� iiiiiii:tisijimitlthtlilimi 0 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator March 27, 1991 Dear Interested Party: This letter is notification that the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), designated as the SEPA responsible official for the City of Renton, issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Black River Corporate Park, Tracts A and B on March 27, 1991. The proponent is applying for a Building Permit, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, a Clearing, Grading and Filling Permit, Site Plan Approval, and a Routine Vegetation Removal Permit. The FEIS augments the Draft EIS by providing additional research and findings, publishing and answering letters received on the Draft, providing additional mitigation, and incorporating by reference a number of documents. These documents, listed below with an asterisk (*), may be viewed at the Renton Public Library, Main Branch, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, 98055. All others are available at the Metro Library, Exchange Building, 821 Second Ave. Seattle, 98104-1598. 1974. Auburn Interceptor EIS *1980. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins, EIS and Appendices. Report No. 910/9-80-077 1981. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Final EIS on the Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1983. Draft Supplemental EIS for the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report. 1983. Final Supplemental EIS on the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report 1983. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle/Draft and Final EISs, Sludge Management Plan. *1984. Final Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternative for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1984. Public Comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternatives for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. *1985. Draft EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. *1985. Final EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1986. Final Supplemental EIS for Secondary Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1988. Final Supplemental EIS for West Point Secondary Treatment Facilities. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Black River Corporate Park FEIS Issuance March 27, 1991 Page 2 *1991. Draft Supplemental EIS, Metro Treatment Plant at Renton. Additional copies of the Draft and Final Black River Corporate Park Tract A and B EIS are available at the third floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue, Renton,WA 98055. Each document costs$10.00 plus tax. The City of Renton will not take any official action on this project until the issuance of the Mitigation Document. The Mitigation Document will list the measures necessary to avoid significant adverse impacts on the environment. At the time this document is issued,the official appeal period on the adequacy of the EIS will begin. Under City of Renton Code 4-6-23, an appeal of the FEIS must be made to the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the permit or other approval is issued. The approval, i.e., underlying governmental action, in this case,the mitigation document. Public hearings on the, appeal of the FEIS and/or the land use actions are tentatively scheduled for the week of May 13 through May 20, 1991. When places and dates for the hearings are finalized, public-notice will be published in the legal notice section of the Valley Daily News. Mary Lynne Myer, of my staff, is available to answer questions on the hearing dates and process. She may be reached at 235-2550. S ly yours, Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator CITY OF RENTON NEWS RELEASE NOTICE OF FEIS ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental.Review Committee (ERC) issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement on March 27, 1991 on the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII (ECF;SA;SM-071-88 & ECF;SA-109-88). ERC will issue a mitigation measures document on the above project based on information from the DEIS and FEIS on April 1990 and March 1991. Description of Proposal: TRACT A The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from one to four stories. . These buildings would provide t83,600 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate • approximately 800 autos. TRACT B The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from three to seven stories. These buildings would provide 286,200 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 500 autos and another 800 stalls would be provided in a three story parking structure. Location of Proposal: The project site is located on Oakesdale Avenue. Type of SEPA Review: Declaration of Significance, SEPA Scoping, Draft EIS, Public hearing on DEIS, Final EIS. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at Development Services, Third Floor, Municipal Building,200 Mill Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section APPEAL: Any appeal as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements, pursuant to WAC 197- 11-68 must be consolidated with an appeal on the agency's decision on the proposed action. The mitigation document is this agency's decision which may be appealed together with the FEIS. These appeals may be filed with the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, by 5:00 PM, 20 days after the issuance of the mitigation document. ,Puget ooJnd :ir Pollution Alga Wilkinson, Exec. Director Daily Journal of Commerce Lontrol Agency . .ef boundary Review BoardPD Sox 11050 20u W Fiercer St, Room 205 3o00 - 13oth P1 Q A''� c Seattle, W- E119- . I' fellevuee, WA 98006-1400 Ira cattle, WA 98111 0avlcl crtz S�� Guwarish Tribal Office U. S. 8 .P.4 Dept or Natur.=,J —=sources 15013 - 1st Ave S Environm•e tal Evaluations 1100 3live Way, •'145'_ Seattle. WA 9E148 1200 - h Ave, M/S MD-102 Seattle, e!A 981J1 Seattl . WA 98101 Journal Aneri•_an King County King County 1J5 - 152nc' -v- NE Dept of Public Works Dept of Public Works Bellevue, 1A '';::0'05 Solid Waste Division Surface Water Mgmt Div DU Yesler Way, Room 600 • 400 Yesler Way, Room 400 Seattle. WA 93104-2637 Seattle, WA 96104-2637 City of K ,nt King County Resource Planning EIS Review Coordinator. Planning . eo_rtment ATTN: Laura Kayl King County Courthouse 2c0 - ,tn Ave S 3o00 - 13oth P1 SE Room 40C Kent. WA 9c. '32-5';95 Bellevue, WA 98006-1400 516 Third Ave . Seattle. WA 98104 Kinc County King County Public Library Kiho County Soil Conservation Planning Division ATTN : Susie Wheeler ATTN: Jack Davis 7tn =loor, Smith Tower 500 - 8th Ave N 935 Powell Ave SW Seattle;, WA 10A Seattle, WA 98109 Renton, WA 93055 King; C°unty Parks 2, Planning O. L . Lensegrav Darlene Madenwelc! ATTf,: Erik Stockc'ale Puget Sound Power & Light We Environmental Council 116 ' Smith Tower PO Sox 349 5200 University Way NE, 4201 306 Second Ave Renton, WA 98057-0329 Seattle, WA 98105 Seattle, WA 98104 METR.0 Poo Malcom, Fisheries Pacific Northwest dell Environmental Planning Div Mucklesnoot Indian Tribe ATTN: Harry Kluges 821 Second Ave, M/S :. _ 40405 Auburn-Enumclaw Rd 1600 - 7tn. Ave, Rm 1513 Seattle , NA 21v= Auburn, WA P8002 Seattle, WA 98191 Puget Sound Council °uget Sound Power 4 Licht Co Puget Sound Water Quality of Government ATTN : EIS Review Authority 12o First Ave S South Central Oiv Office Abbot Raphael Hell Seattle, . A °81U4 320 S Grady Way Mail Stop PV-15 . Renton, WA 98055 Olympia. WA 98504-0900 Greater Penton Cnamber of Renton Scnool Dist 4403 City Attorney Commerce 435 Main Ave S 300 Rainier N Renton, WA 93055 Renton, 'w4 City Council Fire Department Hearin. Examiner's Office Renton Pu:clic ,Library Renton Public Library Mayor Highlands branch (2) Main Sranch (3) ATTN: Mayor's Assistant Parks Scerd (1 ) Parks 8 Recre'ation Dept Planning Commission Police Department Public Works Department SEPA Information Center • Seattle-Kin:] County Seattle Post-Intelligencer Seattle Times-Eestside Edition Dept of Public healtr business News business News 40U Yesler bl•dg 101 Elliott Ave W PO Box 70 Seattle, WA 93101 Seattle. WA 98111 Seattle, WA °8111 Peal Property Services SEPA Register �nn Y R1___ State Department of Ecology Seattle water Copt . Washington ate ����,}}�� poi Environmental Review Section 710 - 2nd Ave. 11tn Floor 0epartm'-. t of Ecology M/S PV-11 Settle, WA C: 1C4-1712 M/S ° -11 EhJ11,1)=14 Olympia. WA 98504 Ol oia, WA 98504 FbBdcirliC3IPY-1 ; D1yM,,p10i1e6A-17(13 State Lepartment of Ecology State Department of Ecology State Dept of Transportation Attn: =IS Review ATTN : Permit Coordinator Highway Admin 9ldg Northwest Regional Office Shorelands M/S KF-01 4350 - 15Jth Ave . M/S PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Redmond, NA 9 0.5? Olympia. WA 98504 Gayle Kreitman, Habit:,t Mgmt State Dept of Game Jerry Schutz • \WA Dept .ol Fisheries 600 •N Capital Way, M/S GJ-11 • State of Washington •'22)13 S 64tn P1. 4E_40 Olympia, WA 93504 Deat of Transportation, Dist 1 'S s a'q u a h, w A J r.J E 7 • 15325 SE 30th ��` 3ellevue, WA 91GU7-o538 • H- 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • vor-""D lo'ro - .-D-Lalt QCX1 • �'l/'S y `,f OQL s 1 1�1, �- • • IQ18b �} �5 tot8� + `� �5 'PAY 9)- poll Q/6 -1-1'1S -n Fa loll het N sl W b�s � ��itro N Y.a s Tl L L.L x. v. 'aT 11L'ac cj sosl T'aJn}eN uo}cuZysLr • v S6L26 Yh' 'c'T11-eaS • _SOF'o CM 'uo}uad Z OisS xoauaN Z-Gf 'TT' r ejncs *I>Z PM' r CL 'Od ti uO1uuTUsem ;,O A1TSJenT4 Ja}ua0 j��tpa4J CSIT�A Jo} p? /1T0 : N11C UTUU?Td usgJn!ycJV to ebaTTc; small AT?e0 AeTIGA S ROLSo CM 'aT l} :ac LZ-LUS .6 CM 'JTdw/ TLLZL-70 86 VM '�TdwtjU 1 c02 S env UO OTLSv9 Z1_ L a}tnS 'DS ul uT.:1Ts bolcLL-C S/ J 'PIS A M UOT5O lucwaTn ;TTPTTN/ysT04.0 A5Jauc }S UO1 UIysem _AcmgbTp 4.6 }uaw}Jeda0 , jaC0TTT ySw* 'JTO 'UO }lM •P PJByDTei UOTleiJOdSUlJ1 }C 1dU0 •j•n JOTJc}ui cy1 OldaU Cfl... _ LOLSo CM 'eTlleac anC I�uccac SSOSS. C,q 'uclua;y t Lm, M' eme L:^ ej1}ezS J 5 iT d _E 2Jn51312 e zeId aPePJC aoTi}G PTa•.d uolu8� cSl_ -0 xcg n 4 N 'Jt' I'dil7 a,T , ,=uTuucTJ _ • nTT LFoc . hTn UOc}Lno 1co�. jTOs O.:T 1S J:ST�. v? 0UN fo luawlJeda` S N aJnljn�ZJ y o lc:a S , } lleac C r) sJE:autzJ_ rC sCJp Ault✓ f let C LOSo CM. '>IaaJD TTj4; :- �njt >IaaJO T;. 36'L,'.c .M. 'AZT Mnl 1 1T IT TN LOCL, PATS Jc}uaJylno C �`= L-'C L' C," 'aTl�a- aS?Teeth`. lo, N ..“. Cl o ;` O 'env Juocac }ddu bPTrd-J 't' �u Tu u'_T� LC�' u:wJaddU Auo1 eTTm>In1 }o hlij ntU ne• 1 OSdaOl.i '�id'1 . uosduoui rcJa? I_' 'C- �Zllc� - �?a'�p‘1�, lid\ �" 'j j 3636 Evanston Ave N, #15 �! Soal , alg144 ( 1455 S -, `Dye `( Seattle, WA 98103 I 1 Julie Bonxell I Mr/Mrs Glen Boyers Jennifer Boyes 9616 - 146th Ave SE I 25 U P1 NE 6203 S 238th P1, F14102 �, j, Renton, WA: 98056 I Auburn, WA 98002. 98032 tl IKent, WA y.. • ` Ip�1�C'i i1F�` I I q Tr-g0g0,01stAve` SE.: #3'42 "' —.__... I v�g,P.x •1;N8'r.ase;, Kalman Brauner Mr. David Bricklin a. S I2603 Queen Anne Ave N Bricklin K Gindler e'r,e:er'I,•Is1-and,- WA_ 98040, Seattle, WA 98109 I 1424 Fourth Ave, Suite 1015 r.; s hA).i{,felt.-: .y:,'s!.r';u-..:, I.: i Seattle, WA 98101 } I' 1 �,•E;,j ?s;�K;e:�i, D:eynYise- Br ng . urlington Northern, I'e H.H.H.H, Bumheardt j j?: 20 .- :6,2ndaNE. 12527 - 35th S 208 Central ' Bldg • °''; �I:,L'' Tacomi,• WA Seattle, WA 98168 I 810 3rd Ave 1 98104 I.t?�jl.ii, Id•I ;t;;;.titr:.i'•i.. j Seattle, WA ,.i ••( Camp Fire Club 7-87 Andrew Carpenter Rhonda Chapman c/o Roseann Johnson - 939 - 24th. Ave S 6726 - 119th Ave SE ' 14035- SE 122nd St Seattle, WA 98144 Renton, WA 98056 .... Renton, WA. 98059 ;i Williem.'N. . Christie/ M.S. Chris Clifford Andrew S. Cohen ; Environmental Scientist 2721 Talbot Rd S 6830 - 23rd NE 26611 - 198th Ave SE Renton, WA 98055' Seattle, WA 98115 1 Kent,. WA 98042 Ii Patrick Conn Container Corp of America Elizabeth Culbert 14720 NE 1st P1, #G4 PO Box 479 25219 Lk Wild CC Or• SE Bellevue, WA 98007 Renton, WA. 98057- Map1e •Valley,. WA 98038 i • • Mr/Mrs Deacy Evelyn. Dolt' Kay Donald q q 407 Whitworth. Ave S 430 Whitworth Ave S 1211 'N 28th P1 Renton, WA 98055 i Renton, WA. 98055 Renton, WA 98056. is Charles/Deborah. Dowd '.'7 Mr. Gary DuVell Lloyd G. Edwards ; 3200 W Concord Way, #446 . 1.•i 2040 Boyer. Ave E 1299 -' 156th AvetNE, #120 Mercer. Island, WA 98040I :1 .Seattle, WA 98112 Bellevue, WA 98007, IIt, I • ' 1,. Sharon. Elliott 1 Ralph. Evans Barbara Faville ' 13503 M.L. King Way S,• #A401:- I ' 3306 NE 11th P1 14300 SE 176th/ #N5 .' Seattle/ WA 98178 f Renton/ WA 98056 . Renton/ WA 98058 Or. Scott Forbes \ ' Amy Forrester , ! Lawrence Forrester' No. 315 - 11675 Seventh Ave 4702 Davis Ave S, #25-101 - 6025 McKinley .P1 N' Richmond, B.C. Renton,/ WA-' 98056 Seattle, WA. 98103 . V4M 2W9 CANADA • Joyce H. Frank Eve Gadbois K Edward J. Gion. 26608 Princeton Ave 21422 - 29th Ave S 408 Whitworth Ave S Kent, WA 98032 Seattle/ WA 98198 • Renton, WA. 98055 Jeff Goltz Office of the Governor M.J./L.E. Graves . Lane Powell Moss 8 Miller State of Washington 905 N 28th P1 711 Capitol Way .Legislative Building Renton/ WA 98056 • Olympia/ WA 98501 • Olympia, WA 98504 I • Robert M. Hastedt -'';' .Mr/Mrs T.W. Hauff ) Beth Healy. 13513 M. L. King Way Si #F204 H 816 S 216th -St, #T-530. 1 1800 N 35th St Seattle/ WA 98178 j : Des Moines, . WA' 98198 Seattle/ WA 98103 , I William J. Hecker . Th}" Janet Heineck John Hendrickson 23415 SE 264 12035 - 32nd Ave NE/ #402 777 - 108th Ave 'NEi #1700 - i Maple Valley/ WA 98038 Seattle/ WA 98125 i Bellevue, 'WA- 98004 ' is; i 11 ,_ . �� i 8ueleh. Hillstrom r� Marie Hoffman, I"u'^`b �T.� • 818 S 27th St 3510 SW 170th 13(01S 7 5G 116C1" , Renton, WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98166 e,k/L, nczOSS' . Barb' Holt Brigitte Hoopes Peter Hudelson 479 Bronson Way. NE PO Box 672 2600 NW 56th St . Renton/ WA, 98056 Kent/ WA 98035 Seattle, WA 98107 'I • ?{�'.k,G TX94 Huns- ! V,;h'i �t1856"'.N: 57th. P0• Box 161 ! 7001 Sand Point Way .NE Seattle/: 'WA 98103 I Renton/ WA- 98057 I Seattle/ WA 98115 I ' , , I Francis Karboly I Or. John P. Kelsall j Mary/James/James Kenney t 211 .NW 7th St 1 22 Deerfield I 7916 Olympic View Dr NW Renton/ WA 98055 I Delta/ B.C. Gig Harbor/ WA 98335 I V4M 2w9 CANADA • Gene Duvernoy King County/ Dept. of 1 John Kohlsaat 1 King Cty Oft of Open Space Public works/ SWIM 12057 SE 42nd St 1621 Smith.Tower 1 701 Dexter. Horton Bldg Bellevue/ WA 98006 506 Second Ave 710 Second Ave ' Seattle/ WA 98104 Seattle/ WA 98104 Tim Krause Gladys Krohn Offices of Richard Arambuni 9235 S 192nd (�„ {,8�Vi4 Pt� • 505 Madison St/ Suite 209 Renton/ WA 98055 ' o n Seattle/ WA 98104 ! 4501 _ 4"1 fkt"'S 0 a?trg' LeAnn T . LaFond Betty Lambert Lori Levin 1 1411 Grant Ave S. #G103- 747 - 96th Ave NE 600 Naches Ave Renton, WA 98055 Bellevue/ WA 98004 Renton/ WA 98055 Jane Lindeman Chris Linden Brian Lumsden 1 , 1006 - 103rd SE 2011- Evergreen Pt Rd I 15500 SE 179th Bellevue/ WA 98004 Bellevue/ WA 98004 Renton, WA 98058 I I Sheryl/ Phil Lundahl Elizabeth. Lundstrom I Cynthia Mack 600 Naches 7705 S 117th St 906 High Ave S Renton. WA 98055 1 Seattle/ WA 98178:; Renton/ WA 98055 I •I t I Kristin MacKay Eric Magelssen Susan Margolis I 3225 Sahalee Dr W 3640 Ashworth N 14001 Northwood P1 .NW Redmond!, WA 98053 Seattle/ WA 98103 Seattle/ WA. 98177 • I Mr. John Marshall Glen D . Martin Janice Martin Wetlands Specialist �V 1520 NE 107th. 133 A 30th Ave Dept of Ecology \ Seattle/ WA 98125 Seattle/ WA 98133 1 Baron Hall/ MS: PV-11 I Olympia/ WA 98504-8711So • Rowland Martin J. A. Matter Dee McClellan 661 , Taylor Ave NW 2566 -, 24th Ave W I 9146 - '121st SE Renton/ WA 98055 Seattle/ WA 98199 Renton/ WA' 98056 Susan. McClellan John/Julie. McCone Marilyn McGill * . 14001 Northwest P1 NW 10115 SE 207th 2221 N 40th Seattle/ WA 98155 Kent/ WA 98031 Seattle/ WA 98103 I ! Doris McGougan ("lark McLenn , Theresa McLean 41, 24820 - 11th S PO Box 227 7004 S 130th St Des Moines/ WA 98198 Vashon, WA 98070 I Seattle/ WA 98178 I Susan M. McNally I Metro O`(� Elizabeth Miles 815 S 219th/ #3 Transit Division bO 22431 - 10th Ave S Des Moines/ WA 98198 I 821 Second Ave Des Moines/ WA 98198 Seattle/ WA 981.04-1598 Joe Mills Marty Murphy Nature Conservancy Ii 22431 - . 10th S PO Box 3070 1601 - 2nd, Suite 910 Des Moines/ WA 98198 Half, Moon Bay/ CA 94019 • Seattle/ WA 98101 . Carroll H. Nevermann Don/Alma Newsome Lois Nordquist r , 27 U Pi NE - 16605 - 127th SE 13503 Empire Way S/ #301A Auburn/ WA 96002 Renton/ WA 98058 Seattle/ WA 98178 Mr. Don Norman Carol Lyn O'Neal Or: Gordon Orions - i University. of Pennsyvania 602 - 29th: SE, #63 Institute of Env. Studies - Dept of 3iology Auburn, WA 98002 • University -of Washington Leidy Labs ' Mail Stop FM-12 Philadelphia/ PA 19104-6018 Seattle/ WA 98195 Mark Ouellette Senator Michael Patrick Mr. John Pear 3912-1/2 NE 105th 109 1704 E Fifth Seattle/ WA 98125 Olympia, WA 98504 Olympia/ WA 98501 ' ilk ! I . _ in.i e 1 r o n L o , , •hnitwortn. AVe 'IP 212, - 10th st, #4 I 11112 SE 73rd P1 Renton, WA: 98055 'j' Kirkland, WA 98033 I Renton, WA 98056 Phil Polizatto Puget Sound Council of Mr/Mrs Orville Radel II 4709 Meridian Ave bovernment 12005 - 71st Ave S Seattle. WA 98103 126 First Ave S Seattle, WA 98178 Seattle. WA 98104 410 . Kriste Rave Dave/Sandi Sager Alicia Sazma. 40 501 N 65th • 1025 N 28th P1 1455 S Puget Dr, #F304 Seattle, WA 98103 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98055 40 II • . 1 Ruth Schaefer LaVinya Schefield Lavinda Schefield if 1 PO Box 12862 11621 - 140th SE 11621 - 140th SE Seattle, WA 98111 Renton. WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 •• 1 Bonnie Scott j Chain Scott i Keith Irvine b oo)L Q;j 2312 NE 9th P1 12513 SW Cove Rd I Seattle Times Renton. WA 98056 Vashon, WA. 98070 I 31620 - 23rd Ave S, . #312 Federal Way. WA 98003 • dd I City of Seattle I City of Seattle Seattle-King County. Commuter ,• 821 2nd Ave i City Comptroller Pool Seattle, WA 98104 600 4th. Rm 101 • Engineering Department Seattle. WA 98104 City Administration Bldg 11w Seattle, WA 98104 Mike Setzer i Paul D . Shafer I Ken/Ada Shannon V Advantage Tire . Service I 11230 Rainier Ave S I 11721 - 78th Ave S 205 Logan St S I Seattle. WA 98178. I Seattle, WA 98178 Renton. WA 98055 - I I 1 ' I I • Mike Shannon I Christopher Shultz I Mr. Robert Sieh 19417 - 2J8th Ave SE 10234 Marine View Dr SW i Edwards & Barbieri ' Renton. WA 98058 Seattle, WA 98146 I 701.. Fifth Ave, Suite 6501 Seattle, WA 98104 . • Susan Smalley Vausa Smith Jay Spencer 14714 SE 188th P1 23211 - 125th -SE 1303 - 33rd Ave S Renton. WA 98058 Kent, WA 98031 ' I Seattle, WA 98144 • 1 ' Jean Spencer Dept of Social/Health Services I Elizabeth Storm 1809 Jones Ave NE State Office Bldg #2 I 18039 SE Wax Rd Renton, WA 98056 Mail Stop: OB-44 Kent, WA 98042 Olympia, WA 98504 Jean Sundherg Kurthy Tord Walter T. Trial, Jr. / 1 121 SW 171st St 11621 - 140th SE 622 NW 51st Seattle, WA 98166 Renton. WA 98056 Seattle, WA 98107 U.S. Dept of Ecology U.S. Soil Conservation Service I Puget Sound Water Quality 0 Federal Building, Rm 1992 140 Rainier Ave S I Authority Seattle, WA 98174 Renton, WA 98055 217 Pine St, Suite 1100 Seattle, WA 98101 Marilyn Weindor-ff I Kathy Wilkins I Shirley Winton (I 16482 - 109th Ave SE I 4258 - 37th Ave W I 7800 NE 24th Renton, WA 98055 Seattle. WA 98199 Bellevue, WA 98004 John Wolf Virginia/James Wood Mr. Dave Wortman 0 18434 - 42nd Ave S 7525 S 135th Friends of the Earth Seattle. WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98178 4512 University Way NE Seattle. WA 98105 • 1 • • Rachel A: Young 22491 - 13th. Ave S 1 Des Moines. WA 98198 321�j Coxi (p (J 3 � e `l�s al PI ' a-#- --el '1S t6' . • µx I Me- "t3 • del l i.e. )4A. Bev-Nnet 6,vy\ rr-N+A_ I(e4.2_o - ([1 SE <115 - 2 (2 Fare SE 3023 QU) 6e1 iRe, n GIC OSS ; 'R �d OS 3 Se al-e._ `I g 1 of ' 135(I M .1_- IC t S a(.4,4.Q., dLCD 9. �-LS Se��4K�e. �$1 17. Rom, n lg o% . CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF ADDENDUM ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued an addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Statement on November 27, 1991 on the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII (ECF;SA;SM-071-88 & ECF;SA-109-89). ERC also issued concurrently within the same document, mitigation measures on the above project based on information from the DEIS, FEIS, and addendum. Description of Proposal: First City Development Corp proposes to build a four-year phased project, including three one to four-story office buildings on 12.07 acres of Tract A, and three four to seven-story buildings on the 15.7 acre Tract B. Tract A will also include surface parking to accommodate the buildings on Tract A. Tract B will include the construction of a three-story parking structure and associated surface parking. Location of Proposal: North of Oaksdale Ave&West of Naches&7th Type of SEPA Review: Addendum to the FEIS and Mitigation Measures amending the May 1991 Mitigation Document and FEIS. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at Development Services, Third Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing on the Environmental and Land Use impacts of this project will be held on December 17, 1991, at 9:00 a.m. in front of the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton. PUBLICATION DATE: December 2, 1991 DATE OF DECISION: November 27, 1991 SIGNATURES: //ram 9 n . uttmann, d inistrator DATE epartment of Planning/Building/Public Works ohn E.Wesley,Administrator DATE Community Service Department r � //-cg7- 9/ ee Wheeler, Fire C of DATE Renton Fire Depart ent CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF ADDENDUM ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued an addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Statement on November 27, 1991 on the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII (ECF;SA;SM-071-88 & ECF;SA-109-89). ERC also issued concurrently within the same document, mitigation measures on the above project based on information from the DEIS, FEIS, and addendum. Description of Proposal: First City Development Corp proposes to build a four-year phased project, including three one to four-story office buildings on 12.07 acres of Tract A, and three four to seven-story buildings on the 15.7 acre Tract B. Tract A will also include surface parking to accommodate the buildings on Tract A., Tract B will include the construction of a three-story parking structure and associated surface parking. Location of Proposal: North of Oaksdale Ave&West of Naches&7th Type of SEPA Review: Addendum to the FEIS and Mitigation Measures amending the May 1991 Mitigation Document and FEIS. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at Development Services, Third Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing on the Environmental and Land Use impacts of this project will be held on December 17, 1991, at 9:00 a.m. in front of the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton. PUBLICATION DATE: December 2, 1991 Account No.51067 adndmpub Y It. F IN '1 JI�l "- �".;•_ Planning/Building blic Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor L'an Guttmann,Administrator December 2, 1991 To all Interested Parties: Since the issuance of the Black River Corporate Park Phase VII and VIII Final EIS (March 27, 1991) and the environmental mitigation document (May 27, 1991), a number of conditions on the site have changed. In response to these changes, an addendum to the FEIS has been issued and the mitigation document is hereby withdrawn and a new document substituted. As referenced in WAC 197-11-600 Find 625, the addendum, prepared prior to the City making a decision on the proposal, adds analyses or information about the proposal but does not substantially change the analysis of significant impacts and alternatives in the existing environmental document. The Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the City of Renton, the applicant, Sierra Club, Seattle Audubon Society, Rainier Audubon Society, Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation and the Sierra Club Cascade Chapter, Sammamish Group, functions as an addendum to the FEIS and as a Mitigation Document for impacts from the proposal. Copies of the document are available at the public information counter (SEPA Information Center) in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above address. A public hearing covering environmental impacts of the project and mitigation for those impacts will be held on December 117, 1991 at 9:00 a.m. If you have any questions on the addendum or the public hearing please call Mary Lynne Myer at 235-2719. Sincerely yours, C.- Donald K Erickson,AICP Secretary to the ERC • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 •' CITY 1 F RENTON Planning/Buildin;,, ibiic Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator December 2, 1991 To all recipients of the Final Environmental Impact Statement on the Black River Corporate Park Phases VII and VIII. Since the issuance of the Black River Corporate Park Phase VII and Vlil Final EIS (March 27, 1991) and•the environmental mitigation.document (May 27, 1991), a number of conditions on the site have changed. In response to these changes, an addendum to the FEIS has been issued and the mitigation document is hereby withdrawn and a new doci ment substituted. As referenced in WAC 197-11-600 and 625, the addendum, prepared prior to the City making a decision on the proposal, adds analyses or information about the proposal but does not substantially change the analysis of significant impacts and alternatives in the existing environmental document. A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the City of Renton, the applicant, Sierra Club, Seattle Audubon Society, Rainier Audubon Society, Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation and the Sierra Club Cascade Chapter, Sammamish Group, is included with this letter. The MOA functions as an addendum to the FEIS and as a Mitigation Document for impacts from the proposal. A public hearing covering environmental impacts of the project and mitigation for those impacts will be held on December 17, 1991 at 9:00 a.m. If you have any questions on the addendum or the public hearing please call Mary Lynne Myer at 235-2719. Sincerely yours, GYI Donald K. Erickson,AICP Secretary to the ERC • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) Julie Evans, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says: . 1. I am over the age eighteen years and as such am qualified to make this affidavit; 2. I am an employee of the environmental consulting firm Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc., in Bellevue, Washington; 3. Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc. prepared the FEIS in the Black River Corporate Park, Tracts A and B, matter; 4. After a printing collation error was discovered,Jones&Stokes Associates,Inc. re-issued its FEIS on April 8, 1991; 5. I prepared for mailing and delivered, postage prepaid, to the United States Post Office in Bellevue, Washington, FEISs addressed to those interested parties shown on the attached list, with two copies going to SEPA Register at the Washington State Department of Ecology. I effected this mailing on April 8, 1991. ?Az_ Z-Vccr-?A Julie Evans SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before e this 8th day of April, 199 e 4\AJ--, • Robin L. McDaniel, Notary Rthlic .- and for the State of Washington, " _ residing at Redmond. My commission expires 3/10/94. fir 1r. Gerry Adams Puget Sound Air Pollution Morgan Bradley Seattle A.ucioioon Society Control Agency Muckleshoot Tribal Council 28803 NE Sig brook Road 200 W Mercer St , k'm 205 39015 172nd Ave SE Duvall. WA ', 8u1 .-0:.14 Seattle , wA e8119- _ Auburn, WA 98,002 Office of the •; overner : ity of Kent Kinc County State of Washington °lanning Department 500 A . Kinc Co Adm 'Bldg Legislative Building 2 ��L /,th Ave C W n • C 7 v� _> Seattle . W.. �:>104 Olympia. WA 985 .'4 • Kent , WA 9En32-5v. 95 King County BALD SEPA Center Gene Duvernoy King County, Dent of 3600 - 136tn Pi SE King Cty Ofc of Ocean So,ace Public Works. SWIM Bellevue, WA 9DD5-140'.._ 161 Smitn Tower 701 Dexter Horton Bldg 506 Second Ave 710 Second Ave Seattle, WA 9 8 1 'D 4 Seattle, WA 9 8'1 0 4 , Erik Stockdale Mr . John Mars,hall Metro Park s,County Pi` , Planning Wetlands Specialist water Quality Division and Resources Dept of Ecology 2.1 Second Ave 506 Second Ave, Suite 11 :J Baron Hall . MS : PV- 11 Seattle , WA 93104-1593 Seattle, WA 9:8104 Olympia. WA 9450L-c'711 Metro METRO Mark Miller Transit Division Environmental Planning Div . 1st City Development Corp , 321 Second Ave 821 Second Ave, MS-63 300 Sth Ave, Suite 4170 Seattle . WA 981O=' -15 , Seattle , WA 98104 Seattle, WA 93104 6 r Office of Program Planning, Pacific Northwest Bell Ms . Terra Proden and Fiscal Management ATTN : Harry Kluges Shoreline Management Dept 101 House Office B1 'c 1o00 - 7th Ave, Rm 1 `_:13 State Department of Ecology Olympia. WA P%;: ?!: Seattle♦ ',WA 98191 Baron Hall, MS : PV-11 • Olympia , WA 98504-8711 • Puget Sound Council cf Greater Renton Chamber Renton School C'ist 403 of Commerce 435 Main Ave S Government 170,2 Rainier N Renton, WA 98055 126 First AveS Renton . WA 98055Seattle , WA '�v1 'S4 Seattle-Kinc County Commuter Seattle-King County Debt . of SEPA Rscister Pool Public Health Washington State J'DE Engineering Department 400 Yesler Building M/S PV -11 City Administration Bldg Seattle , WA 981C'1 Jlympia, 'WA 98504 Seattle , WA 98104 Needs ._ , LIJr ICZ .' : .1. - ' ' Des"o Ecol o1 y Mr . Robert Sieh State Department of Edwards S Barbieri Transportation 701 Fifth Ave, Suite 6501 Highway Administration Bldg Seattle, WA 98104 Mail Stop KF-01 Olympia , WA 98504 • U . S . Fish 8 Wildlife Service U . S . Soil Conservation Servicet,'asl^.incton Natural Gas Co . 121 - 107th NE 140 Rainier Ave S 815 Mercer Bellevue, WA Renton , WA 9055 Seattle. WA 98111 Puget Sound Water Duality Mr . Dave Wortman U . S E . P . A . Authority 'Friends of the Earth :: valuation Branch 217 Pine St, Suite 110U 4512 University Way NE 1200 oth Ave, VS : MD-102 Seattle , WA 981 1 Seattle. WA 9'8105 erattie. WA 93101 Daily Journal of Commerce Journal American . PO Sox 11050 z � NEDuWamish Tribal Office . 9 ? 111 1705 - 1 na AveAv�> 1 5<.i1 6 - 1st Ave S Seattle , WA Bellevue. -I WA 98005 Seattle. WA 9814; David Bortz King County Public Library Department of Wildlife Dept of Natural Resources ATTN : Susie Wheeler • State cf Washington 1100 Olive Way , i1450 300 - 8th Ave N 600 N Capitol Way, MS GJ-11 Seattle , WA 98101 Seattle . WA 98109 Olympia, WA 98504 Seattle-Kino County Seattle Times-Eaastside Edition Seattle Post-lntelligencer Dept of Public Health Business News Business News 400 Yesler Bldg P3 Box 70 101 Elliott Ave by Seattle. WA 98101 Seattle , WA 98111 Seattle . WA 98111 • • Valley Daily News Puget Sound Power F. Light Co ATTN : City Editor ATTN : EIS Review College of Arcn /Urban Plannino .. PO Box 1Central Div Office South University of Washington Kent. WA 9P•032 020 S Grady Way 224 On-2�. Gould Hall, J� i Renton . WA 98055 Seattle, AA 919.5 City of Tukwila King County Joil Conservation 14fu_re_ Coy\serV Planning Bldg Dept ATTN : Jack Davis .. 620u Scuthcenter Blvd 935 Powell Ave cl_.J L(00I 2- SU1 G I Tukwila/ Penton . WA cs 5 WA 9Q 1 n i_._ a Sea4le., WA ,8 10 i U . S . Army Corps of =n.,1ne_r: State repmrtmont of FCClC y =noin2erino Div-Planning Attn : iS HerWalter Tr ate. nm.Vi n r2` 1Cnt 'C Eox C- 7S5 Northwest o., a; 2 Herrera environments 1Cn .J i five14Seattier s! A C 124 Lv5 ;J - 1 ?Jth AV2 Sr a41ttlle� A, e r ~ -. 1D9 ve N, �Uit= C .. Y 9: . 2 c m o n c ♦ • U . S . Dept of Acriculture U . S . t of . U . ,ta ,i-.t of in.t : rior Soil Censer D r �1a a 1 nr - l � f,3 l , Dfc Conservation n f is A c d ,ui . .� - r /s� cl 1 _ ., ,ic 1 935 Powell :SW ` � 17,21 Second .?ve % i Par<nont ! n^ Renton. WA �s - 5 _e_ , tle / a! 01 ..�1 ✓mria , � � 9E5 Department of Fisheries fate Dept of '; =me � R1l�G "f A Qe06,11 ( mmdb is tti State of ashinaton m,711 Stop ;d-11 1 115 Gen Admin :•lda, M� AX -11 1. N Capital Way e.yVO-��l • Olympia, w A 9 3 5"_. j j y m p i a, W A q., : D 4 III 1,c-Ge 2 t 5 ,A L U Mai l Stop fC L-11 Olyvv\ppc ) WA 985041-— S 'I Y / Black River appeal hearings delayed = _ RENTON - Appeal hearings on the proposed Black River-Corpo rate Park have been put off from early October until December or _ January,with city officials hoping that all sides in the issue can reach a - _ - - compromise. -_- .'' .- - Renton:City Attorney Larry Warren said all parties in. the Black t- - River Corporate Park appeals are at the negotiating table. _ Earlier this spring, the city came out with an approximately 200- i,__`_, ..• .,:: page environmental study on the proposed corporate park, which i . __ would be located near a major heronry on the site of the old Earlington _ . _ _- Golf Course. A number of groups appealed the study as well as the i. ., - . . - city's subsequent mitigation plan,a plan that outlined measures to ease the effects of the project on the surrounding environment. First City ' Washington Inc,, theproject proponent, appealed all 132 recom- g _ Soci- - ,.-- ,!7mitigation plan. The Seattle A udubon ,,,,, `.' ;..:e $; '�-` f�;.:t-. -- p�•-�:�=�'�Y � mended conditions in the p � k�>x�r<-; �" =->,. - = ^r_ ja��� ,• " Wildlands Preservation also filed an appeal. ety and Renton project have also been complicated by the _ _ - - _ __ Plans for the proposed - _ _ �. eagles this s rin the heron nests byP _ g• - - raidingof g - - - -•i - - r r== :.ice - 1 - • • CIT" OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator September 4, 1991 Dean Erickson First City Washington, Inc. 700 Fifth Ave, #6000 Seattle,WA 98104 Dear Mr. Erickson: Enclosed is the latest heron report from Jones & Stokes, Inc. As I mentioned in the previous correspondence with you, I requested Jones & Stokes to stop monitoring efforts as of July 18, 1991. This report incorrectly states that monthly monitoring will continue from August to December of 1991. This is ' contrary to my earlier instruction to Jones & Stokes. I will reconfirm with them the ending of the monitoring. You are in receipt of the billings for these efforts. Please call me at 235-2719 if you have any questions. Sincerely, .172/(4,7c/tri_s_z_.}.hr, Mary Lynne Myer Principal Planner cc: Don Erickson Pat Prewitt Jon Ives, Jones&Stokes, Inc. Jeff Bergland, Jones&Stokes, Inc. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON 4 ' AUG 301991 RECEIVED • • JONES& STOKES ASSOCIATES. INC./2820 NORTHUP WAY. SUITE 100/BELLEVUE, WA 98004 206/822-1077 FAX 206/822-1079 DATE: July 18, 1991 TO: Mary Lynne Meyer, City of Renton, Long-Range Planning FROM: Jon Ives o s1 ,),67Jeff Bergi it d SUBJECT: Status of Black River Great Blue Heron Colony as of July 9, 1991 This memorandum presents.the results of the contimied monitoring to assess the 1991 nesting status.of.the-.Black-River fieron:colony. The-Juiy_9;1991:survey was conducted as part of an ongoing monitoringeffortiitiated.subsequent:to-mimerous bald eagle attacks on the colony during the early:=stages-of:the 1991..nesting.season_ Similar surveys were conducted at the colony in May,and June 1991 'Results-of 2111991-surveys are summarized in Table 1. . Methodology A 3-1/2 hour field survey was conducted on July 9,.1991. Survey methods were similar to those employed during the May and June surveys.and included monitoring the colony from observation points on Tract A and on the north side of the riparian grove, as well as surveying the nest structures within the riparian grove on foot while watching for additional nest structures and evidence of active nesting. Results Great blue herons were observed on three occasions during the survey. One heron was seen flying north over the Boeing office buildings east of the site, one was seen landing and perching in a snag along the P-1 Pond, and one was observed landing and foraging in the P-1 Pond. Each of the herons were adults, and none of the herons were observed simultaneously. Renton.First Cry 7 Final EIS July I&1991 Mary Lynne Meyer July 18, 1991 Page 2 As observed during the previous surveys, nests in the main colony and in the adjacent riparian forest were vacant_ No signs of active nesting, such as recent whitewash, egg shell fragments, or begging calls of young, were detected. No additional nest structures were observed during the survey; however, it was ' discovered that one of the nest trees identified in Figure 1 of the June 21, 1991 memo was mapped incorrectly. The nest tree,which is located immediately north of the main colony, is correctly mapped in Figure 1 of this report. Conclusions June and July surveys of the colony and adjacent riparian forest revealed no active great_blue.:heron_nests or- evidence of nesting activity. Thus, it is likely that 1991 nesting attempts.in...these-areas have•been abandoned. A small.number of herons are apparently .continuing to forage-:im.the.P 1-Pond. . ° A.smentioned:in theJune 214991 memo,apparent abandonment of the:199Lnesting.-- :.'effortat1he colony does of necessar ly imply that herons will not nest at the colourin the: • • f itare . ' -Mo i •=subsequent nesting seasons would be necessary to accurately •.assess'thestatus:ofihexBlack:River colony. Monthly monitoring surveys will continue from -:.August:'.through-December=ofthis year to confirm findings to date. Rmtoa Fuss Cuy 7 Final EIS July 18.1991 • Table 1. Summary of 1991 Survey Results -- Black River Great Blue Heron Colony Survey Date # of Nest # of Nest : Comments Trees Structures • 2-2-91 4 29 Sever` 1lier"ou :pbleTved in main colony and in P-1 Pond. Pair formation and nett.dc.ffnse not yet underway. • i 4 �4, c:a.i'llwr:i.. ..S,c:1 :,: ,: • 4-6-91 6 38 First $uiivey folio,;: ng'report of bald eagle attack. Only 7 of the 38 nests had a 4 ye lnc 1 aon;:;:Remaining 31 nests were either under constitiction or had adults standing on or near the structures. 4-14-91 6 38 Leaf cover complete;'observations of nests difficult. Eleven nests observed with incubating adults. Status of remaining nests unknown due to leaf cover. High activity in colony suggested colony was active and egg laying/incubation was ongoing. 5-17-91 6 38 No herons observed in main colony or adjacent nest trees. Three adults observed entering and leaving center of riparian forest. No additional herons were observed. 5-20-91 9 41 . Three nest trees discovered in center of riparian forest. One heron flushed from one of the newly-discovered nest trees. Nests in main colony and in adjacent nest trees were vacant. No additional herons were observed. 6-18-91 12 45 Three additional nest trees observed in center of riparian forest. No recent signs of nesting activity (eggshell fragments, whitewash, etc.) observed. No herons observed near nest structures. Two adult herons flushed from P-1 Pond. 7-9-91 12 45 Three adult herons observed near P-1 Pond; no herons observed near nest structures. No signs of nesting activity observed. No additional nest structures detected. Ilc mnn.First City 7 final I31ti July 15.1991 r� '::..:.:•:, +:.;+;]j"•x,.,�.; y.s;.. .'!•S<2}k, 'tj� .. :> •>`:•:•t'rt";x}c:ei:"`y. :E'• • (' is{'.: n;>:.$>.g��i}+i'.F''C �'ilr ,�4`�ri•',E }� ;YLL'\ .'•:`•} •r;A ••^�.:• iQ "~ • i.l .�};:i! r a .;:f.:i:$i;:4Ljrk' !?f,^ .5�3:?. y$�,y.Jf. ,' +off•`,; ti 1 x�<g .�� '� r' .t j} ':: : :?3,.{;:W:g>n,,,,.o..4S '.• ;{'R\<:$44:.v:CO:;lS ffi}.4" ::D i 'i i '•: :{':`•i•} •:.$3),{3{2a••:1,,`.•:;•� :;•S,{..33' •l;t;E}y ;,:;f.,kfE L';✓�v;:..i ''2fD .4::.,s„:4,",: • ;};f;4. i•:Y;•�s :i.V0.4. xfyl),Y.4;A;,`!t(f•''•' �4.<:r '}< •D , ': ..k:'i{•.••• • ':;`;`rf •:i:yp:'L` •E: ',i<,:::. • n\., ,), •'114 •.J(.•;' �L •.:4} ::....\!h:::}\.:.,,�k,V/ 'k;y•L'•i,(}{i':v':<{r.Sh.j j E;•.,y:.,�,<,,> ),n •'\Yi". ✓`y;•;{<;i:}.;•n ':4>. .: ,+ v+ }: v':YvI.�/ •$s v:.:4v;,:i.Y••,•.J,f: •JQ, ,•.•f••Y..try{.!E"8?•. }} t, r•/,•}:•%rr;Y;S':,•i:' af•. •+Y: ,n ,;;•'i'?i}`;4') ?y;t; :).1: :• :4k• S is yy"�','';L' ',% .. '•%��,}•�•' y.�:S3i�:?y '`}.1:;;�f,�f,�,:.a, �>,: .�.:'t.��'�s;:>.Cq;,,:a,`d..Yl}•� • �.'f�:�:'• , 1/.f:%I:i• "- . J .nc>•3•.,.y:,. ;i:4,','' . •. r.i•:}}}1: :',: ;' i•E',••Q• f''S{ i\:' .,Si 4< ,-.U, ;r,:}2✓/" E ;:•,:4;., ti 44 Ty2Y•<y�,ay'i�t': c, >'{ yr. "/ •;:•,•:jr. ,<7''S4. .{ :t'' J� ''\+ t> • , .y / ,,,% ,,Fii, 6' •: ,aj?+.F}Rsl✓''' :+. L >••t ,y� :,2 r,;S / ;�!0G {• ''r''' 4,{ f. .:: •.}}j::,?j'E;i> ,: is•4,!y•y,{y�{? • • •; ;, ..:,/.{:`.'y,y'/ '•:.: '.;,•:., .:/f;:}j4; ?y:•sj}{, s:y":,:i$, : .• ,s�•C:±'i', •i,•': •;!.fy �r4{i/. J ... :••:';:�•:+••,�• E,••5`•;.Ey,{yJ '+n�.,•<,•,.8�::.E'ji':ii•F° ,:•L„ ��t• .) '�fr' • .. '••y.• £,. ,,;g '3:r:i�f,,. .{Cis'3E!`:.`;:�;(•::;•'•X..<•K.•i..`�`:,`(,G4`;S. S{•r.,Zs:;a.i,'i " • <>''Yi�;}4 . j;. F ...so f,. ';iY{W.:::,.•:.Si?r{:E`g:V.iik.OrJ?..'3:y!'•'2> :'< w3i).2.�. an.••l3.' {{. 9.'{i.,::v,:'6,\. >`.:;,:Er..:,?; :y;`;F#j}S }r.Y;,>,,.�,`'}',E� ).f}r• Rt�E;.,�+;t� , a.:,// ..4.w' 6,r.•••,.:};r .,J .y;{4 5 ,r f)rN f'+.1, on >}'fi>•:i.i /�Yr.�: '>, • . ;s;: • • ��. 433.,•tii::;:;%:i>.<,A. ,'Q' ,:�. ' tj, 'S�p`�in �`)rC' ,} t :n S'f:> •:;,,, •+Y'>• K y,>✓t :a,'f q•.v;:•< ,`i2.:k: :Et`, ^)c,,.:0„;),` �`. sy 3r{.[#w:2Z''f ', ' • istif. ?:•i•SL ..}: • • • • .f r i , r:.;d' ?l+ r.S,?• , . ; • ��,QC `.'•:. }-;.rN'((a•'� -/:Y>' •f..::•,•::F%•.,•:'•: /v•::.,.t:,.'-..4•�>:i ::,.%. ;,'.jC:. ',; t\2�f,:.•;•EY.A')•,.:,t} � •�" � ::•:i•,:y:� '; : Y"K;�hk $�`�.:'ii<'•,.ti: .".>.,...'f v •.;."`. N>f ) Yk ;• • ../ fl:f.v•n •y$i' :4•>.•n,•:,:r.: �j ' ,. FR'o' • . "eq.--•':' '??7.rF? :„S•q.`.i4 ` f"..' r:;l//%.X•ri? ,,+y•r /N. {,4Y:•"0E f: n `• J`ki s+::. .:%•':�i s'���i %•%i•^:J,:>><i^}'h. i .s.:.,'�. • [•.] 3j%ll ? J y • . �.% F :. a• -^.f . i .'•i.. • > �' f ,'.[ ,ril.,, ]3.& ,'+•J% s , :, y ..?. .yfa ,t:• • • • • • • • • • f• .. L ;' . if • ; :i t , i;,'; ,%;;•:('•L.•.,,,<. .o:;>,. ;4 .•%.'4 ; f ? 3 's ..<s. �y>c>.y3/g:3..,.:1-.5:i. ..S.. f{•tnx, E`4,:$<}�:LF,.,: - . • :%% i• , ii• .%• a4. A :S�., S• , '' rk*,hN ,,•: 4:"S t 'o'/.4. ' ::'N 44:,y:$." •:,}$, �.y''; :''''::•�:/:' !{'y:% ?.:Y; • •• ; •L:{ n+ ri .'' , )' Y \ , ir!:,"A• ; ir ,:•. t • i. : 7 f ,<o ) , 6 4 A r • • 3 \ )it' t "3 ?y] si f :r. 3'•i2:r :'t f �{{•S i3 •;s .. Eo?` • is �•;i+,,.;. y;::`:'•; • $'iF: __ti._.._ .— __c__.,. '^:3r'$-}`:Ys•`wa'.i:k. ,\• >S% iS' ':.t"' .nail.. :%Ff.:•'',::•i•,,'•j<:}?.Y.r.,,r'l•.r.'�: ,{r 'S .i'4;:::.]' ,• ••.••v 4`!N %n,&,�,{ - P�. • !,•i _;,y;._,v'.'.'•,....__.../{:' _.. . '•/. . 1 •`,} x:Ff•xk.}.: .j:h•l:/'•••'':£„ � ;!,r,,;9 ,fy`-('•/;9. r�: _ JS"i.- .._•_. _ -_ . - fat J,..C� :.v.t••'•: :yii) y „ }."mac • `^1L:: u:/ }!\2 ,4.F•!: ,✓.i r. 'r A>v }f��; : •ir;: - _ •-'f•,.:+•i;: •- ._- -,}:.`'it- ..,i.:-< _ }.:<. .4. . s•fsii„c. .,�•r:` f%},:�:',r: �° !'' c.. ',i'y.• ,. - • > is• %� :%• • . .� ra / /� V I•. • `'if "j/ .t. /• n`)a �2J'..kti f< ram•; • • .r.• k.. • • T, y ` • •c �s .iir:;; 'S • *::::I y.:r.,:.: s. ',,..� ':.i'.• L✓ • • • • ^:b:r LS. .l, nGf. Y / • Y S• :y::. .,�•r,,4. Ac � • • • • ..f..r.G• * C .s ,tiff<:y{:' • ,� '�•, "' • iS •.3i •, U 4` / 3 .:Et• i:. tY: y l :a.L.i `S.}r. CC, 1 i" %Lf qCri•' 'Y. , +.. `fi' �3 ..'2i ..75.+, nh, • •• • . .• 2 4� n•4. r y l <\ 'i •t•r. •ta �f' • .Y^ ''4i ..g33r iYi; { +..�: -'...? >y s ,: r;,Y. • ::: • 0 r f f -AA" / % L }, ?y x. 4n' A • W •!}+:•n•f;:;}Ya.y,. f{rA.Y. y fCs' /+1 SS.¢,:1C: .. ,r'•..r ,.;. { • • •• a \ ! .�: n s.,L..+.4• k'r,• n .{...:. .r '�1,:i,'• •... ' •., `•'.iWy >''Lz.� +'i 4:: 4<..?f n{i. :'{F'n,rl Y'T.1 ,. . • f'., ..1. t' y , T '4YF:r r :;::•'<p...;fk(4 i+,9.}]:4k.,'. {;:;+ ':�'{.y t 2'J:+,:'n: :( - ":}.••.' :.rv.. ,•S,. .ft,:,{};y}:4.5•{?;;'y/r`<),/.SI. 'a'•:•9?'r:} /.:;,/,{ir. ...,v fj ..�a.4.S�,.N 2• .:v�.4fC vv• :. + r.i :yn : v.';r'•.::% -'•S''r a) y% g'f •{L • y ) .. 's• #.�J ; s• .riL )+., `•:S•.i:r.:,koj/%i ,y.' .:,wiry( ...•.;....S..: • 4' .;.:.,.:..::?•::Y..:i.::.iT'•r f.•a0, . is•'••i•!.•; • .,• . :• t••::• - it is��?{ E ,y: • • • • • • CD •.:•.....�:... •..• • • • ')'• L sr • : : :: .. : Y^{ }iij rYv,v�. •.... '. ': ...•.v :. ::. • .• . rr , CC • • • ..• r. . ' ,•'•L• .. ,:�.+ ::Y.^, t 3fY. • F:: .S. ., : • /� { } • �} ) - �: . • COtM \ a.: •l i `-, ;<i :< `a;;:. tjF YS a) :i'ijy L . is iC: ,.... 5, 'f.V. f:�,`.; • T • St >Y { V J nI f , r Apr- `1<y, /„ Y h . • V A x ti% • 1> ). 2. !:4:• i)� Z., { • C y e Y'• !L, lt Y J + •' • 6 •G rtt„ 4 t� .} Y 0 , 2' -10 •c,F• 3, A 3}y .f T ::,,tfik)kr•• > �•3 •.,}2f n. • 'n4 L. /�\ •.O S, 2t,' • u/ C •;<4 Sl F,< !va i6,• tt t `•Ea • �t • • • W ens\ x '^ f--:rynk. • ,,} },, v/ '•f n '•a• ,�( F vr.t'• • � .f s \t{. {; • t F4 • .� •k• ,yi .l, n, S .: W .y:ti .fa, T,1•>�.p.•k�,.tf>#,"'\bj��f9a;;�iyi}ij;;?. L •,•?. .s<fi :+ 'F%i,C, . f.;1:4;,• r:4Ye•:fei','%.;E: �, •L,#;� Via: ,�;••.y;e{tiy +tgZ7;).,:" ',;i'.�^. ,y�.e<;y,' H .tyh•),S•ES ^Er.ti r•,. '�'.. 1'r pp, ` >•":•f Ti":E• r• � •: .,ii)v',r.:..i::i,.;•!•):vi:• ; .j <' • • • . • • • • t•' 4 • ��F ' > • ' 5� :' •; ;,.... .. , _`f0".•J \ Y \ r',;�^; <F fF yy � ,y.f�, ,;;•(,, ta '.:...;y, •: ,,(,:. .1:,.p•:y \ S� ;;'A`� S , .•. f` ..>;, • t} '. .C;�::ra< .}, + aklt3" i .s ' •, ,: " ' j?': k : •�, •{?f : •<ni: > v�/•••• • • • • • • .i44`{: ;; � :ter \''.' \: : }i:'f .�i v Cw: ` i "k`••.q` lx.}•• S y:. t - 2 • ,r-}sS,.., ;:• ,< ; : ; `-^ '`s'r 1 U ';' : 9.• • • . . n{0 , . .. R•.v , :'. Y,+<?i . n..s •+: r..f•..:: . .,..r. .:,. r •... ,> .,c.! ,.c • • .t .. { ... ,)y � ,.1.... r ': ; l 4:4' y �r S .i { '2:•:•Ei 14 i,. ';..: '.f•33f.' , ';,;•.y:.}•.. :.....:.. '•.,, .:> .-T,. is r.<.. :.>• :..f:�: f <c .3 4F: .3. ) wt 'ii' ) 3r: n:• .'\ t J,3:.•:•+. ,f.::::..,.•,,.::•y:• :.' •'••, '•;i:k,. 4y...:.:*:.:.•.' ,•••:: •:'•:-./1, , y`rn f.�Y .} J, •}, ' 4 ,) ),i 4v,•.:;.:•••.:•:.,::..:i•i.A..,:}.} •..: :: v,\... ':,.... ♦..v.>C 4 n ,.J'v_. n,.,r.:.:....... J.. .. •• .:..:.•:2•: ,....:::..:.v. .::;i::. {. .: 5,...♦ .•2'.r:. .. f'.W > v y + ,..•::;-;...v.:••n.....•v> 'v L.. n•r t:.:::v:`:rn.;... . .;r .X :•:•y. ;.p3.. ..••., {.:.;;n•,;.,•qj $ $IC <�,f. 1. g A a( n ` :a • I ,k •r y ) :`y} • /\ Y+'f.' .4 ... ., ... . .fir .. .2e .\ .w .. Y . +.:•. :- .. .•.r '"f.. •'T� .O :,tk::r P+f.fi�tt •`\S.`o:• {..r::r.i , • (.. „y, . •. •:%� SY }';•j�tist\ i<�k .iE{<}.r:.{ '•:!. :•?%•; ,7.t'f4.r6.r„ ••..:.r, ?\,•. ga ••.} 'c,.:{;..}.,.:ri^.•:. .< .;,,4 .,,•.4:.:::i,:•. • yb}.f,\ ;,i.!.;::{,:,!;.: v •q.,.. :•.;.•.4>;-.:\' N....L,. "•)2. .. •.,.\:f v,•.F ,, fT'.:) • • •5 {{�� f'`''2+'k �J( i(r.,.��; v..;<v v:•< :;..r. .,! s rr:.'v'+' - ,, .f[ •}',Tk}ti `>,}•v ""•K• .:4.C: :H::{' �`.��>4:.y, P . .. ..+:: fin. '. .:y }••.:,qE•.;'e' .>i Q v:-CC•<S):,<•? ,,YP; .y.(a•. .I .. .r::.:: r.::: ?•k > 4 3F,.,.\.:..i 7,„ 'A>..tT.. '<..i n :. .•/ . .' fs;.;:•.,;�; •.:•f is `i'Y:"�'••:'i:�:.':>i.), _ .},/. ]>i•,t, .;i.,.;:';.:<�J.•:•;?.: •�;... .. .. , +}f.•. 'f. w:?°i't;:vi;y:ki•;Y}:!s: :}`t'l,C`,1�,.--},, ri`•.e.' o_ V ... .. .. 4 .. f• ' •{ •V2(• ; .'r' •.a7F;,it%?,5., •.1!a ' :'4 • • • • 5 a:1 BV L.& &. 902 WATERFRONT PLACE • 1011 WESTERN AVENUE GORDON SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104-1097 (206)382-9540 • FACSIMILE(206)626-0675 ATTORNEYS AT LAW PETER L.BUCK OF COUNSEL BRENT CARSON ALISON D.BIRMINGHAM JAY P.DERR MADELEINE A.F. BRENNER JOEL M.GORDON AMY L.KOSTERLITZ KEITH E.MOXON PROJECT MANAGER NORA J.PAILLE June 11, 1991 KATHRYN A.GARDOW,P.E. PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JIJ 1 2 1991 Mr. Fred Kauffman ECE V Hearing Examiner Municipal Building City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98005 Re: Scheduling of Appeal of ERC Mitigation Document/Site Plan Hearing Dear Mr. Kauffman: Enclosed please find First City Washington, Inc.'s appeal of the ERC mitigation document. This letter is to explain why we do not believe it is feasible to be ready for the hearings tentatively scheduled for mid-July and to get a confirmation that the hearings have been rescheduled for September or October. As you are aware, the hearing has been tentatively scheduled several times this spring and the dates have been moved due to the fact that it took longer to issue both the EIS and • the ERC mitigation document than projected. This has been a source of great frustration to my client as well as the City staff, and I am sure to your office as well. Now that the mitigation document has come out, it is again necessary to move a date which was scheduled before the delay in issuance of the mitigation document was known or the lengthy and complex nature of that document were known. The mitigation document requires numerous extraordinary and detailed plans, not typically required at this stage, to be prepared in advance of a hearing on the site plan. Some of these requirements are appealed in the Applicant's appeal for the reasons stated therein. However, due to the remaining number of complex and uncontemplated plans required at the site plan review stage, as well as the lengthy and problematic nature of the mitigation document occasioning this appeal, First City believes that neither it nor the City can be prepared to hold a hearing on the dates tentatively scheduled for July. Thus, First City has told staff that it agrees to relinquish those dates. We have been in touch with Lenora Mr. Fred Kauffman - 2 - June 11, 1991 Blauman to set a more realistic hearing schedule and understand that the first available dates that meet a realistic time frame are currently in October. We would appreciate confirmation that the July dates have been released and of the exact dates of the rescheduled hearing at your earliest convenience. We regret that this process is taking longer than contemplated and share your frustration that it has occasioned so many changes in all of our schedules. We look forward to hearing from you. Very truly yours, Amy L. terlitz cc: Don Erickson Mary Lynn Meyer Lenora Blauman Larry Warren Dean Erickson BUCK `7L 902 WATERFRONT PLACE • 1011 WESTERN AVENUE GOON SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104-1097 (206)382-9540 • FACSIMILE(206)626-0675 ATTORNEYS AT LAW PETER L.BUCK OF COUNSEL BRENT CARSON ALISON D.BIRMINGHAM JAY P.DERR ' MADELEINE A.F.BRENNER JOEL M.GORDON AMY L.KOSTERLITZ KEITH E.MOXON PROJECT MANAGER NORA J.PAILLE KATHRYN A.GARDOW,P.E. June 11, 1991 Mr. Fred Kauffman Hearing Examiner Municipal Building City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98005 Re: Appeal of ERC Mitigation Document for Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII-VIII Dear Mr. Kauffman: This letter is submitted on behalf of First City Washington, Inc. to formally appeal the SEPA mitigation measures imposed on the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII, dated May 28, 1991. The name and address of the appellant is: First City Washington, Inc. Attn: Mr. Dean Erickson 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6000 Seattle, WA 98104 Any and all correspondence with the appellant should also be directed to its legal representative: Buck and Gordon Attn: Amy Kosterlitz Waterfront Place Building, Suite 902 1011 Western Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 The Appellant is appealing all of the 132 recommended conditions of approval contained in the mitigation document, for either substance or clarification, and in some instances, both. • Mr. Fred Kauffman - 2 - June 11, 1991 The grounds for the appeal include, but are not limited to the following: 1. The conditions are in excess of the SEPA authority of the City of Renton. 2. The conditions are not necessary to mitigate the specific probable adverse environmental impacts from the proposed actions identified in the environmental documents prepared pursuant to SEPA. 3. The mitigation conditions are not reasonable and capable of being accomplished. 4. The conditions are not supported by the City's SEPA policies. 5. The conditions impermissibly impose responsibility for mitigating measures on the applicant beyond the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of its proposal. 6. The mitigation conditions impose mitigation with regard to impacts that are merely speculative. 7. The ERC mitigation document contains errors of fact, inconsistencies and errors of law. 8. The ERC.mitigation document and its conditions are clearly erroneous, arbitrary and capricious and without basis in fact or law. First City Washington, Inc. hereby reserves the right to amend, modify and supplement the grounds upon which this appeal is based and reserves the right to present detailed information supporting this appeal prior to and/or at the appeal hearing. Respectfully submitted, BUCK AND GORDON Amy K.4rlitz cc: Don Erickson Mary Lynn Meyer Lenora Blauman Larry Warren Dean Erickson ' FC17501\A06101.ALK BUCK `JL 902 WATERFRONT PLACE • 1011 WESTERN AVENUE GORDON SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104-1097 (206)382-9540 • FACSIMILE(206)626-0675 ATTORNEYS AT LAW PETER L.BUCK OF COUNSEL BRENT CARSON ALISON D.BIRMINGHAM JAY P.DERR MADELEINE A.F.BRENNER JOEL M.GORDON AMY L.KOSTERLITZ KEITH E.MOXON PROJECT MANAGER NORA J.PAILLE July 10, 1991 KATHRYN A.GARDOW,P.E. PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON JUL 1 1 1991 Mr. Fred Kauffman Hearing Examiner RECEIVED I City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Additional Detail Regarding Appellant First City Washington's Appeal Dear Mr. Kauffman: This letter will serve as First City's response to your letter of June 28, 1991 requesting that the issues subject to the appeal be set forth with more particularity. As you noted in your letter, this will not constitute the full statement of First City's arguments, which will be supplemented through a hearing memorandum and other materials. First City would like to confirm that your separation of the hearing on the environmental issues (to be held in October) from the hearing on the site plan (to be held at some later date) means that no further site plan materials or other plans beyond what has already been submitted to the City will be required prior to the October hearings. If First City has misunderstood your intent in this regard, please let me know as soon as possible what specific additional items will be required for the October hearings. The particular issues that are a subject of those grounds of appeal stated in our June 11, 1991 letter are as follows: 1) Setback Requirements -- First City wishes to introduce evidence regarding its project impacts,' what setback distance may be necessary and appropriate to address these, how this distance should be measured, and under what circumstances a setback may be required. First City also wishes to respond to the opposition's request for "increased buffer areas from the periphery of the heronry." 2) Berm/Buffer -- First City wishes to introduce evidence regarding whether and under what circumstances a berm and buffer may be required, what those requirements should be, and how Mr. Fred Kauffman - 2 - July 10, 1991 these requirements should interface with other project construction. First City will respond to the opposition's request for increased buffers and landscaping. 3) Landscaping -- First City believes that the numerous and conflicting requirements for landscaping in the ERC decision should be clarified. Upon clarification, First City wishes to introduce evidence regarding the need for, appropriateness and feasibility of these requirements- ; -including a response to the opposition's request for increased landscaping. 4) Construction Limitations -- First City wishes to introduce evidence regarding the need for and appropriateness of these conditions to address project impacts, the feasibility of compliance, the type and extent of restrictions on construction activities that may be applied, and the time periods and circumstances warranting restrictions--including a response to the opposition's request for increased construction restrictions. 5) Project Phasing -- First City wishes to introduce evidence regarding the impacts and feasibility of various phasing scenarios, and what requirements are appropriate under what circumstances to address project impacts. 6) Monitoring Requirements -- First City wishes to introduce evidence regarding what monitoring requirements may be necessary and appropriate to deal with project impacts, under what circumstances these should apply, how the process should work, what criteria should apply, and how the results of monitoring can be used. 7) Level of Detail Required at Site Plan Review -- First City wishes to contest the additional level of detail and type of plans that will be required to be submitted at the site plan hearing stage. (Assumes no further plans are required for October hearings as set forth above.) 8) Traffic Mitigation -- First City wishes to introduce evidence regarding the appropriate amount of the traffic mitigation fee and the appropriateness and feasibility of some of the other traffic mitigation conditions. First City also wishes to introduce evidence that requirements for detailed plans regarding mitigation of the potential future cumulative construction traffic impacts of other projects still in the planning stage is not required and not reasonable or capable of being accomplished. 9) Water Quality/Stormwater Issues -- First City believes that the requirements regarding water quality and stormwater detention need to be clarified and wishes to introduce evidence regarding what requirements are necessary and appropriate, and at what stage, to deal with water quality and water quantity issues. 10) Light. Glare. Noise Issues -- First City wishes to introduce evidence regarding the necessity and appropriateness of these requirements to mitigate project impacts, the feasibility of accomplishing such measures, and the problematic and conflicting nature of these requirements with other requirements (e.g. conflicts between requirements that certain areas used by pedestrians not be lighted with public safety requirements), the feasibility of implementing certain noise control measures, etc. Mr. Fred Kauffman . - 3. - July 10, 1991 11) Hazardous Waste -- First City wishes to present evidence regarding what is required to address the contamination that has been identified on a portion of Tract A and how this could impact the requirement for archaeological study. 12) Architectural Restrictions -- First City wishes to present evidence regarding the necessity and appropriateness of the height limits and what is required based upon project impacts. First City wishes to present evidence on the appropriateness of other architectural measures such as window screens to mitigate project impacts and evidence regarding the permissibility and feasibility of other requirements related to building design such as the conflicting requirement that buildings be oriented away from the Metro Treatment Plant. 13) Public Access Requirements, Requirements Regarding Installation of Improvements on City-Owned Land -- First City wishes to present evidence regarding inconsistencies in providing public access with the requirement to minimize impacts on wildlife, the necessity and appropriateness of the conditions to mitigate project impacts, feasibility, public safety and liability issues associated with these requirements. First City also wishes to address the problematic nature of installing and maintaining landscaping and gates on City-owned property. 14) Vague and Open-Ended Conditions to Address Potential Future Impacts of Other Projects -- First City wishes to present evidence and argument to show that such conditions are impermissible because they are based upon speculative impacts, are unreasonable and incapable of being accomplished, and based upon impacts not related to this project. First City reserves the right to introduce evidence on any other issues raised by the city or the opponents in its appeal, not addressed above. Very truly yours, BUCK & GORDON K°S LL) Amy L. LQosterlitz Attorneys for First City Washington cc: Lawrence Warren Don Erickson Mary Lynn Meyer Lenora Blauman Dean Erickson F0750111.07031.AIK CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: July 8, 1991 TO: Lynn Guttmann, Administrator FROM: Don Erickson, Principal Planner SUBJECT: Blackriver Corporate Park Opportunities The following is a draft summary of what I heard from Amy Kostolitz and Dean Erickson after a meeting I had with them on Rabanco. In short, because of a lot of recent changes during the last few months, e.g., degree of contamination found on Tract A, the abandonment of the Heron rookery by the Herons, the compensation monies from Metro for their Phase III Expansion, etc., First City Development feels that there may be an opportunity to create a revised scheme that reflects these.,changes and creates a "win/win" situation for most, if not all, parties. Assumptions o That it is in all parties interest to achieve a development plan that provides a high degree of protection and public awareness of the uniqueness of the riparian natural environment at the site, while also allowing reasonable economic development. o The heron will likely not return to the existing main rookery this year and, in fact, are likely to seek greater refuge by developing future nesting sites deeper into the riparian forest where they are less exposed. o The long term viability of the heron rookery would come through its resiting deeper into an enlarged and more buffered riparian forest further west. o Contamination on Tract A is real and must be cleaned up before the site could be sold to a private purchaser. This is because most, if not all, lenders today require that an applicant provide certification from the proper authorities that a site is clean. o Any changes in Renton's Shoreline Master Program as it now pertains to Tract C and its Natural Environment designation west of the heron rookery is likely to be contentious. Proposal First City would like to use the time between now and the public hearing on Phase VII and Phase VIII to explore the possibility of a new development scenario that includes public acquisition of some or all of Tract A, while allowing more development freedom on Tract B while the herons are absent. Pros o Potentially avoids costly delays involved with the clean up of Tract A. o City ownership is preferred by First City since it reduces their liability for accidents by members of the public who would use the trail easement on the berm. .1 I o Public acquisition of Tract A was preferred by Metro because it is adjacent to their site and takes away the issue of adverse impacts of their plant expansion on this site. o Public acquisition of Tract A presumably would provide Metro with an area in which to replace their existing 'wetland" if that were their choice with future development (Expansion IV). o Tract A is large enough to provide an interpretive area where the public, including school children, + could learn about the 50 or more species of wildlife found on the site and possibly about the early Indian culture that occupied this area centuries ago. Note: Because most of Tract C is designated as a Natural Environment under the City's Shoreline Master Program, most of it cannot be used for recreational or interpretive purposes since even trails are prohibited under this designation. Cons o Unless all development rights on Tract A were transferred elsewhere (Tract B and/or a portion of Tract C near Naches Avenue), there would likely be lower property tax revenues accruing to the City. o This change could shift the responsibility for putting in the road and berm buffer, if it is still needed, I'I to the future purchaser of Tract A, presumably the City. ld I I I I,I ,I 1'1 i x w ,ays�c -ryw....,,. N x r ,� 1711t, V[1 tile C "� t- -k. �- z . - V : � 4rAl � ' ���4 � .F Valley Corn (as the ag E .K �r m r ; ;h t - tµ�t - considered by some to be - . s w .: '; -. tions centers in the state >,,,•y� _ Z®� at ' 't* x T � �� ,` "I can't imagine having to`v{ 1 • multitude of ways,' said Tukw, : k . „ �;: : ' ,< ;`' `-4 „a..,, ' g 3 Waldner. "It bridges virtually _ ., ByROBERT H.REID ., ..f . •- �' Asociated Press - ' , 4 ` ` *' a ;f= >Wi resources for all the geographic regiot, '_ Ate, >? `•.\ "A'''' „ _._:,:-,---- . - - f 'It t� '° `� Besides the member cities of Auburn;a.- MANILA, Philippines - The r V 44 >,,,-,:: :• -.. fr ` ;' _- is y °_ _ and Tukwila, Valley Corn provides dispa\R U.S. military began removing all ;4 : ` 'Y t •f ;. . f li �� .. ; _ 1 ,` ▪; ,,' , k. ,: vices under contract for the cities of Algona a��4 20,000 dependents from the Philip v t - - w 3' _ is and several Valley fire districts. . pines on Sunday, and tens of thou- • _ ' „,` =�` =-� '� r:- ., Y s _ r .- ''' � `.`Fifteenyears isprettysolid to have this r�io" sands of Filipinos trekked along ash- :, '-t• ,; - �` _, f i $ �;•='y ` agencies work cooperatively,' said Valley Col;;_; clogged roads to escape Mount Pin �_. , Director Chris Fischer. "I know there have been(dis- " atubo's devastation. ••�`. r 4 ' •,,: sl V - • r 4, - \.- y_. ' ;s . patching) centers that disbanded. A lot of it was At least 56of people were killed i �' � g Y , - since the volcano began erupting • `r - because of disagreement about control issues.' ' s,, • t '+ , There hasn't been a struggle for control at Valley June 9 for the first time in 600 years. 1- i ,, ..,,;, �k . •! ,> Corn,though,Fischer said. I r g Several minor eruptions were , _ , reported Sunday, --4 } ,,.;., '`.,• '4i - r .' �_. * F "I think we're a little more mature than that," satd ,1geeS but scientists said � � .s c " Auburn Police Chief Jake Evans. = theyno longer Although h the ma ors, police chiefs and fire chiefs ten of flight g _ _ ." of the member cities don't agree on everything, they •from ash A9 feared a cataclys- ^� _ _ .�.- . _ �} • are committed to continuing the Valley Corn opera ' mic explosion in q!; - • which the mountain could blow K =•:. a _ tion and ``agree to disagree" on some issues. Fischer '� , 4. said. itself apart. 1. y��� .t ° • ` �'°- ` The exodus of refugees through Valley Daily News photo by MARCUS R.DONNER See COM,A4 4 the rice-producing region of central Valley Corn shift Supervisor Lora Ueland takes notes while talking to a caller._ . _ ;. : _ - Luzon was reminiscent of scenes ..... _. - - - s i from World War II, Thousands of _ : _k _ . ■ cars,buses and trucks, fi ! r t 'On t eron ■ oS I �SS u�,Wless columns of refugees carrying rn wl - -- - - - i children and bundles of supplies on `�'". - !I their backs. Some rode water buffs-. By TINA y News G The environmental groups charge that the. To protect the birds, the city had limited since the mid-1980s. It's not yet known. t valley Daily News - environmental study of the project failed to -buildings on the site to five stories. First whether the eagle attacks will permanently loes or ox carts;but thousands were RENTON - Environmental groups and fully address the effects of the development City's plans had included one seven-story affect the colony. on foot. Others, including the elder- - In their appeal, the environmental groups 's, ' �d children, hitched rides on the developers are challenging measures ordered on its surroundings. building. PP i �' of commercial trucks. by the city to protect a.heron colony from a. - "They have their side, and we have ours " = The city's protection measures included a questioned the adequacy of the project's envi- J. :� U.S. military had announced proposed new business park. said Susan Krom with Renton Citizens for ,600-foot.setback from the main heron colony, ronmental study.The study,they said,has not € Calling the conditions "erroneous,.arbi Wildlands Preservation. "I feel sorry for,the- covered windows, and a 10-foot.berm with fully addressed alternatives to the project or plans to send families of Clark Air , Base personnel back to the United trary and capricious,',. First City Washington hearing examiner and the city." 20-foot trees to protect the:bird's privacy. measures that could help avoid significant i States to relieve congestion at Subic Inc., the project proponent,has appealed.all _, ` Officials from First City Washington:were . City officials also-have called for halting -effects to the area's wildlife. Ba naval base, where they were 132.of the city's protective measures for the . unavailable for comment. any.construction within 800 feet of the colony The proposed setbacks, berms, landscap- Y Blackriver Corporate Park. -: The proposed Blackriver Corporate.Park, between Feb; 1 and July 1 and within 600 feet. :ing, screening, and height limitations all are taken June 10. Meanwhile,Renton Citizens For Wildlands .-°'which:calls for constructing six buildings"on' from July 1.to Aug. 1:A monitoring commit- insufficient,they wrote. On Sunday,however, the evacua- Preservation, the Seattle and Rainier:Audu 28 acres of the old Earlington-Golf Course,,= tee.would observe the•wildlife. The environmental study was based on tion was expanded to include fami- bon Societies, and the Cascade Sierra Club: .has been embroiled in controversy:because of .. 'This spring eagles attacked and ate heron are expected to submit their appeal toda - its proximityto a heron colon ,eggs at the colony, which has been at the site . See HERONS,A5 See ASH,A9 PY- = y' gg Y • 7- : sitsoutshowscued wing walk ▪ 1,,, er f � F sst • n :,!, �1 r b ' 2nd da , e y ' • Ian X-; 3 ��$ ' ar �:0 �• '„s By DANNY WESTNEAT Hill neighborhoods tend to have vTT• 7 C`7?l�,i►I"1 fl.-o e D\ _ Pnrtlinrl RnCP Festival. s �` ' ;�...', s - i`a---- ir'li,..,n..;l.,AIe..•� _4 trn,,_;nr,nma ffmiliee_ associat- '' iIIiliUk i� 110444 IL rIIV iflhl ; r kcin I the House during the regu- The 1990 Growth Management a statewide board. The Senate pre- Snohomish, Clark, Kitsap, Thir- 'in but stalled in a Senate Act requires the state's dozen fast- fers regional boards to better reflect ston, Whatcom, Skagit, Island, •e headed by Sen. Bob growing counties, and nearly a doz- local values and traditions. Tim Chelan, Yakima and Clallam. t, R-Spokane. en more that "opted into" the law, Martin,a Senate aide,said the nego- Others chose to subject them- lin,a loud foe of state land- to embrace land-use plans. The tiators have tentatively settled on the selves to the law.They are San Juan, ling, has withdrawn from plans are aimed at controlling urban Senate position. Mason,Jefferson, Pacific, Douglas, 'ct. Hayner, King and other sprawl, transportation snarls, and ■ Standards and guidelines on Kittitas, Benton, Franklin, Walla takers agreed to negotiate loss of farm, forest and open space. which a board or boards would Walla, Ferry and Pend Oreille. ire at Gardner's request. "A bill this year certainly won't determine compliance with the 1990 tics pledged to voters last address all the issues," Hayner said law. Senate leaders droppedHayner said prospects for passage [hey would work hard on Y their Y P P P" b •ontrol legislation in Friday in an interview. "In the first opposition and are dickering over of phase two of the legislation will for voter rejection of a cit place, last year's legislation still substance, King's aide, Torn Camp hinge as much on the clock as on hasn't been digested by the counties. bell, said. negotiations. If the special 30 day ;ttive proposing stringent And that doesn't even take ■ Sanctions against counties that session, which began June 10, controls. Voters rejected Aefnd until law d she said. g should end soon, "then we might 547 by a 3-1 margin. But Ehlers, Kingandrefuse to follow the land use plan- not get it done," she said. "But if it 'tors, who include minori Hayner said ning law. The negotiators are near goes another week or two" pros- of both houses,are sweat- progress is being made on three agreement on a proposal to withhold pects for passage are good, she said. especially nettlesome issues. They various state collected taxes as well hard issues ranging from mpel counties to/follow the are: as state grant funds. "We're negotiating in good to development of Stan IIState or regional boards to Counties required to pass land-use faith," added King, "but we still which to judge a county's judge county growth-management plans due to their populations or have sizeable differences. We'll just ice. plans. Gardner and the House want growth rates include King, Pierce, have to see." lid there's a good chance HERONS: 'xorhoods could get better , , by joining a city, but a� 4,4 ems to know which ones lr�:• t z x,``'°y°,;" Builder thisplan will a >_:,r 1,ss ,t �''i4x,$•a .;• ::<a.` a appeals be deciding •? ;M ""'_ ',f,,,, ¢a°` .,',...4:, he might w :, - ,; '5.,.: '' ?: all 132 conditions y g ant to join, if A 'P• ` 's`r 4 'i" " f•: 'nt said. `` /. ;r d fi „ `° ' v:>= Continued from page Al ,t is currently served by • , • -°<`, IV:.,(.,f f: �`l; r , 't. ; P 9 'hoots, eight different 1. f a5 ,3 ',•. ..> r.t,:.� ,.,_.'..,,,: ; ; ;�...„ `incomplete, inadequate, and ,.;,.. �.. ':` •;:' •, ' •,•:: ; : biased data and analysis,' the :i. s: dents here ._ '„=b j , <: 5„,kr,•`. ,;:'" groups charge. f;'=x " ' :'> • ` Krom says the city has been "tak- ronglythat •1"' ,.,.;illlll r` , ing numbers and pulling them out of :» =�=- � thin air. 're part of a ., , N •°£:, `You've got to go with the IVe - ",! experts," she said. rY . In a one-page appeal from First lunity. Most �' + a 3 City Washington, the firm's legal T k i. aa' P,, .a, ; K kq' K counsel wrote that the company was ?round here 1--K `t,, R,v . ` 3 t 1 appealing all 132 recommended � � ( ~, ' ' , conditions for "either their sub- don twant to 1,4 Ott'�$r „ t ,xx F, F 4 , .3` stance or clarification or in some 1exed at all or ) ° • w f ai. instances both." ., �'� .„.1 .e3•t .� `*r . ,�., =" r ' t, = • 4`) '' t The appeal said the conditions r�go as a u '~ - 4 �. , placed on the development exceeded to one city. „ . - z,z w,., . ; 4,,Js the city's authority, and were "not G:�-a ;•` • •,'.<'„ :.;�:,r•:;` reasonable or capable of being y, accomplished." (ley,West Hill Community •--_,: ,, ,:,, Council 'zr'' .* ,> " . • ',' The conditions also are unreason - Council },. � "` to` -f'" �. �, F�,v,'o � o<;,�t : able because the possible effects of ;, • 1. ",z"•;i•' t :s'h'.a; the project on the herons are"mere- ?tiers, and King 'i r '' ', rt , .', :,,' County , .;,, ), rr'e' '. s r . •3, ly speculative.' lice protection. • e . ,•� ',..4:.. . i<n<• V. '�` a 6 +9' `4;4 I Skyway is a prime �t "`` f "' x':,:";;I::.-:',.:-.;,'"' :; `s ,GFl The appeals will go to the Renton lSky aye is such its <4,x:•r;`i. G : _< '►; ;i;,,.::' •r, b cep • . as,ga ; }..,.• ,. y:''r.'`f`r'Ja'-` `:. ar=i :�' :;>:_;. ' hearing examiner. A hearingdate '"" ; y., has not yet been set. 'tt, its view properties, )t'' : �: ,�a, I:4t„.� +< .r... ":,17 ar.. , as a famil domin it ;� :,;= Y•.< 3r': ,�r i'" `°y' <?: Renton ility qt .t, s: r. +==..3 ,;, _ .t� c• F,•�•�,§,� Planner MaryLynne illy. ;�:��;�<< ,;�.,.,.,k,;.! `Ay,li, ` 1< t ',' Myer, who is managing the city' I Hill area is home to .. ..'>.`:A,t•.•.�,. �. .,�:�, 3�:, r4 aa. �::: -;,, ,. � g g s ,y';•. _, o:O:4,,', i, ", I i ,„_' y; ""s• response to the Blackriver project, )0 people, of whom 80 k� " '1' ='ft: L4 to 44, ,.,:a:: ?" P J • �i,,,„.‹ :':,:. . pp L ; : ., �� said the appeals are indicative of the �Tv:'"R!°,' 4' i t.;'�rlY:y 6' . .. ` x.xd'.''tP . white, nine percent • ::,. < ;'�0%,',) ,". ` 4, ; TT i.• T ,,� , ,,; ;.•,;,���4� 1 � � �c r,, ,� �.�,.��f t importance of the site for both the tight percent black. r`'-;t ,1` 4 4 f� its i, ;, "d : 1 applicant and the public. land use plans involve .i- ,'s w +" i , i, ,• '•� t P ., ,,:-.:;;.1.,�:., >K i,, 0s �"= , '�V. ,,• • . .m, 't0 ' ' 1, "The tons, but because there �•!_ ��• �;sr� �- I•�,> Ri '� �•. . concerns are verystrongon vacant land in Skyway, ;- - ',0-:', .r, ::I*O'i 4s°'''' 11 t ' a , '. .? C +r� _ both sides, and both feel theyhave Y Y, �k.., #tc�,': . ;,rlu ,, , important things to III concentrate on socialValley Pprotect, and Is and capital improve- Skyway's quiet neighborhoods are home to youn News geworto king families. that's r," she said.e appeals process is - - - - - - - - f Police arrest man in abduction case 1 1 SALEM,Ore. (AP)-Marion County sheriff's depu- Michael D. Schrunk said James Thurston Morgan 1 ties Sunday arrested James Thurston Morgan Sunday in should "never walk as a free man in society again." i connection with the abduction of three girls, a crime Marion County authorities arrested Morgan on Sun- 1 similar to one he committed 16 years ago. day about 1 p.m. at the entrance to Fisherman's Bend i Morgan, 53, was lodged in Marion County Jail fol- campground on the North Santiam River east of Salem. 1 lowing his arrest on charges of rape, kidnapping, rob- The three young women, all ages 16 and 17, left the 1 bery, sex abuse,attempted murder and being an ex-con- Roseland Theater in Portland's Old Town district late i 1 vict in possession of a firearm. Saturday or early Sunday. They were walking to their 1 He was arrested after three teenage girls reported they car, parked about two blocks away, when they were 011.11411 were walking to their car in downtown Portland late confronted by a man armed with a gun, said Deputy u Saturday when they were confronted at gunpoint by a David Hussey of the Marion County sheriff's office. 1 man who got into their car, robbed them, forced them to The women had just attended a Crazy 8s concert at the drive to a campground, raped one girl and Fled. theater, formerly known as the Starry Night nightclub. i Last fall, Morgan was paroled from prison even The man ordered the three women to drive him to Jr 1 though he had been sentenced to 120 years for, among Salem in their car,and he robbed them at gunpoint along 1 other crimes, kidnapping four Portland girls and sodom- the way, Hussey said. izing them, The Oregonian reported. Sheriff's deputies found Morgan on Sunday afternoon i Sixteen years ago, then-Deputy District Attorney near the campground. c i i CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY - MITIGATION DOCUMENT APPLICATION NO(S): ECF;SA;SM-071-88&ECF;SA-109-I1 PROPONENT: First City Development Corp. PROJECT NAME: Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: First City Development Corp proposes to build a four-year phased project, including three one to four-story office buildings on 12.07 acres of Tract A, and three four to seven-story buildings on the 15.7 acre Tract B. Tract A will also include surface parking to accommodate the buildings on Tract A. Tract B will include the construction of a three-story parking structure and associated surface parking. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: North of Oaksdale Ave&West of Naches&7th LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee, under WAC 197-11-660, has issued a mitigation document to address the environmental impacts expected from the potential development of the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII. An environmental impact statement was required for this project under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c) and other documents cited in the ordinance. The impacts described in that statements are the basis for the mitigating measures in the mitigation document. This decision was made by the Environmental Review Committee after review of the completed environmental impact statement and other information on file with the lead agency. Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., June 17, 1991. Any appeal as to the adequacy of the FEIS must also be filed by 5:00 p.m.,June 17, 1991. See City Code Section 4-8-11, WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21 C.075. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Secretary Development Planning Section Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m.,June 17, 1991. To appeal this Declaration, you must file your appeal document with the hearing examiner within fourteen (14) days of the date the decision was made. See City Code Section 4-8-11, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-680 for further details. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Community Development Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. PUBLICATION DATE: May 26, 1991 DATE OF DECISION: May 22, 1991 SIGNATURES: . \\\./ ..._/-- -- 4 Litlri ILynn A c.uttman Administrator Depart, - t of Planning/Building/Public Works ii IvJQs� 4 - 12 - 9 / John E.Webley,Administrator r DATE Cdt unity Service Department d —42-- /Lee Wy49Ier, Fire hief DATE Renton Fire Department mitsig . ,1 • STATT PLANNING DIVISION �.:... CITY OF REN T ON CHRISTINE O.GREGOIRE a Director '�'y. toy°$ !!ee��ppqq y 9 �JtJltl 1 2 . ���d STATE OF WASHINGTON RECEIVED DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office,3190- 160th Ave S.E. • Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452 • (206)649-7000 June 10, 1991 Mr. Don Erickson Secretary Environmental Review Committee Planning/Building/Public Works Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park Phases VII, VIII, Tract A, Final Environmental Impact Statement and Mitigation Document Dear Mr. Erickson: In reading the above documents, I have found some inaccuracies, which I would like to address at this time. FEIS Page 3-2 The statement is made that Ecology has not proposed a cleanup standard for zinc. This is not true. By using the Method B cleanup standards for zinc found in WAC 173-340-740 a cleanup standard of 500 ppm is derived. Tract A of this site contains zinc at 1000 ppm (parts per million) , which exceeds the zinc cleanup standard. Page 3-30 Reference is made to using industrial cleanup standards for this property. Industrial. cleanup standards are not suitable for application to commercial properties. In this case, the residential cleanup standards would apply (Method B, or numerical standards Method A) . The cleanup standard for chromium is 100 ppm. Cleanup standards are exceeded for chromium, as well as for zinc, cadmium and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) . The TCLP test is a test to determine if metals exceed dangerous waste criteria under Chapter 173-303 WAC, it is not a health-based standard for risk assessment, or cleanup purposes. Standards set under Method B Chapter 173-340, the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) , are health-based standards, as are Method A standards, with the exception of TPH, which is based on groundwater protection. 3 Don Erickson June 10, 1991 Page 2 Page 3-31, Mitigation Measures The proponent offers to "seal" the contaminated soils with asphalt or buildings. This is not a preferred cleanup action under WAC 173-340-360. Cleanup actions, in order of preference, under this regulation are: (i) Reuse or recycling; (ii) Destruction or detoxification; (iii) Separation or volume reduction followed by reuse, recycling, destruction or detoxification of the residual hazardous substance; (iv) Immobilization of hazardous substances; (v) On-site or off-site disposal at an engineered facility designed to minimize the future release of a hazardous substance in accordance with applicable state and federal laws; (vi) Isolation or containment with attendant engineering controls; and (vii) Institutional controls and monitoring. Subsection (C) states, "Since cleanup actions will often involve a combination of technologies, cleanup action alternatives shall maximize the use of higher preference technologies. " - Subsection (d) states, ". . . The adoption of the technology preferences in this subsection is designed to make it more difficult to select a cleanup action with a low preference without careful explanation of why technologies above it have not been used. " Ecology had a meeting with the proponent on May 15, 1991. When this solution was presented, Ecology advised the proponent not to place anything permanent over this area, so as not to preclude any future remedial actions, should this be found to be necessary. This would rule out the placement of building structures. Mitigation Document The following comments pertain to Tract A, pages 18 and 19: Industrial cleanup standards are not appropriate for this site, residential cleanup standards are used for commercial property under Chapter 173-340 WAC. Using these standards, Tract A exceeds health based cleanups standards for cadmium, chromium and zinc. The numerical cleanup standards for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) is also exceeded. Item #49 The proponent offers to "seal" the contaminated soils with asphalt or buildings. This is not a preferred cleanup action under WAC 173-340-360. For a list of cleanup actions, in order of preference, please see the comment to the FEIS, page 3-31, Mitigation Measures. Ecology had a meeting with the proponent on May 15, 1991. When this "solution" was presented, Ecology advised the proponent not to place anything permanent over this area, so as not to preclude any future remedial actions, should this be found to be necessary. This would rule out the placement of building structures. Don Erickson June 10, 1991 Page 3 Item #5 The applicant proposes to note the location of any identified contaminated soils exceeding Ecology cleanup standards previously identified or found during construction on site on the as built drawings, specifying the levels of pollutants and the origin of the pollutants. Ecology assumes this means correction of the earlier assumptions excluding chromium and zinc, or other compounds which may be found to exceed standards? How can this mitigation possibly be complied with without having an approved sampling plan in place prior to construction, stipulating the frequency of sampling during construction, parameters to be analyzed for, and reportables to be submitted to the city? Thank you for the opportunity to respond on the adequacy of these documents. Should you have questions, I may be contacted at 649-7058. Sincerely, Gail Colburn Site Assessment Unit Supervisor Toxics Cleanup Program GC:dh CC: Mike Gallagher, Ecology - TCP Dan Cargill, Ecology - TCP Norm Peck, Ecology - TCP Lon Kissinger, Ecology - TCP Louise Bardy, Ecology - TCP Mary Lynne Myer, City of Renton Fred Kauffman, Hearing Examiner, City of Renton PLANNING DiV?SiCN Cr Y OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON JUN 2 1 1991 r�tuElVED JUN , U 5 1991 khCEIVED AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION CITY CLERK'S OFFICE LeAnne Hutton ,being first duly sworn on oath states 51 067 that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the • VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition NOTICE OF MITIGATION DOCUMENT and SEPA APPEAL Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers Notice is given under SEPA, RCW are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-660, that the monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to, printed andpublished City t forRe First has issued aa mitigation - ument for Cities Development Corpo- in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ration's proposed Black River Corporate County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Park. Copies of the document are available atnewspaper order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for in the public informationr)inth countyp (SEPA by p g Information Center)in the Development Ser- King County. vices Division, Third Floor, Renton Munici- pal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,Washington 98055. Reading The up ice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition copies are available in the Renton Municipal , Renton Edition , Auburn Edition , (and not in Library at the above address. supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers DESCRIPTIONityDevelopmentO PROPOSAL: PP g y public notice First City Corp proposes to during the below stated period. The annexed notice abuild a phased project, including three one to four-story office buildings on #5 8 0 7 12.07 acres of Tract A,and three four to seven-story buildings on the 15.7 acre Tract B.Tract A will also include surface May 26 , 1991 parking to accommodate the buildings was published on on Tract A. Tract B will include the construction of a three-story parking structure and associated surface park- The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the ing. The project is located north of 4 9 . 9 5 Oaksdale Ave. &West of Naches&7th. sum of$ Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m.,June 17, 1991.Any appeal as to the adequacy of the FEIS must also be filed by 5:00 p.m., June 17, 1991. See City Code Section 4-8-11, WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21 C.075. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Reston, Subscribed and sworn before me this 31 day of May 19 91 Development Services Division, to read or IA" ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. Published in the Valley Daily News May or Notary ',bile for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF MITIGATION DOCUMENT and SEPA APPEAL Notice is given under SEPA, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-660, that the City of Renton has issued a mitigation document for First Cities Development Corporation's proposed Black River Corporate Park.. Copies of the document are available at the public information county (SEPA Information Center) in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: First City Development Corp proposes to build a phased project, including three one to four-story office buildings on 12.07 acres of Tract A, and three four to seven-story buildings on the 15.7 acre Tract B. Tract A will also include surface parking to accommodate the buildings on Tract A. Tract B will include the construction of a three- story parking structure and associated surface parking. The project is located north of Oaksdale Ave&West of Naches&7th. Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., June 17, 1991. Any appeal as to the adequacy of the FEIS must also be filed by 5:00 p.m., June 17, 1991. See City Code Section 4-8-11, WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21 C.075. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Development Services Division,to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. • Publication Date: May 26, 1991 Account No. 51067 %0 :w• CITY OF RENTON "LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 24, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park Mitigation Document ECF;SA;SM-071-88&ECF;SA-109-88 Dear Interested Party: This is to inform you that, under SEPA, RCW 43.21 C.075 and WAC 197-11-660, the City of Renton has issued a mitigation document for the Black River Corporate Park Environmental Impact Statement. Copies of the document are available at the public information counter (SEPA Information Center) in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Renton Municipal Building located at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. Reading copies are available in the Renton Municipal Library at the above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: First City Development Corp proposes to build a phased project, including three one to four-story office buildings on 12.07 acres of Tract A, and three four to seven-story buildings on the 15.7 acre Tract B. Tract A will also include surface parking to accommodate the buildings on Tract A. Tract B will include the construction of a three- story parking structure and associated surface parking. The project is located north of Oaksdale Ave&West of Neches&7th. Any interested party may appeal these conditions in writing by 5:00 p.m., June 17, 1991. See City Code Section 4-8-11,WAC 197-11-680 for further details and RCW 43.21 C.075. Any appeal as to the adequacy of the EIS must be filed with the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the decision was made to issue the mitigation document. All appeals must be received by June 17, 1991, 5:00 p.m. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections to either the mitigation document and/or the EIS. If you have any questions about the procedures for either appeal, please contact Mary Lynne Myer at 235- 2550. • Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CIT r OF RENTON "LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 10, 1991 SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII Final Environmental Impact Statement Dear Recipient/Party of Interest: The Black River Final Environmental Impact Statement included a section on cumulative impacts, reflecting the potential for development of several projects in the vicinity of the Corporate Park. These projects included the projected expansion of the Metro Wastewater Treatment Facility. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement for this project was released just prior to the Black River FEIS. The Final EIS included erroneous information which necessitates a revision. This letter documents that revision. Attached, please find an errata sheet for this item. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call 235-2550. S' ely, v L . Donald K. Erickson,AICP Principal Planner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • ERRATA SHEET Please substitute the following paragraph for Paragraph 3, page 3-62 in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII. Offensive odors could occasionally be generated from the treatment facility and extend beyond the boundaries of the site, even with Metro's proposed odor control plan. These odors most likely would come from mechanical failures, emergencies or system upsets, or, infrequently, unusual circumstances during day-to-day operations. These odors have the greatest potential for crossing Tracts A and B when the prevailing winds are from the south and southwest. WY OF RENTO APR 2 5 199 RECEIVED CITY CLERKS OFFICE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 471'g3 Leanne Hutton ,being first duly sworn on oath states 51 067 that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS CITY OF RENT-ON • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition NOTICE OF FEIS ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) Dailynewspapers six 6 times a week. That said newspapers , issued the Final Environmental Statement published ( ) on March 27, 1991 on the Black River Cor- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six porate Park, Phases VII and VIII: months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published (ECF;SA;SM-071-88 & ECF;SA-109-88)..' in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kent KingERC will issue a mitigation measures doc- g ument on the above project based on infer-. County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal ;mation from the DEIS and FEIS on April,' newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for 1990 and March 1991. Kin Count Description of Proposal: g y TRACT A The proposal includes phased construc-, The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition tion of three office buildings ranging in Renton Edition x x Auburn Edition xx height from one to four stories.These build-' , (and not in j ings would provide 183,600 square feet of supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers ;space. Surface parking would accommo-' during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Public Notice. daTRaro ACT g mately 800 autos. T co #5 5 6 8 i tion hrop of e pth ee al officeiu des buildingsedranging u in height from three to seven stories. These April. 1 ,.. 1991 .. buildings would provide 286,200 square feet was published on of space. Surface parking would accommo-1 date approximately 500 autos and another ,800 stalls would be provided in a three story The full argount f.the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the i parkingLo structure.Pr g g g Location of Proposal: Sum of$ The project site is located on Oakesdale, Avenue. Type of SEPA Review: Declaration of Significance, SEPA Scop- d1W. ����' �, r - ing,Draft EIS,Public hearing on DEIS,Final EIS. i Documents maybe examined during reg- ular business hours at Development Servic- Subscribed and sworn before me this 2 2.n d day of r i 1 19 91 ;es,Third Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ap 'Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public I Works Development Planning Section APPEAL: Any appeal as to the adequacy of the Nota Public for the State of Washington 'Draft and Final Environmental Impact State- ments,pursuant to WAC 197-11-68 must be residing at Auburn, consolidated with an appeal on the agen- King County, Washington Icy's decision on the proposed action. The mitigation document is this agency's deci- VDN#87 Revised 4/89 'sion which may be appealed together with the FEIS. These appeals may be filed with the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, by 500 P.M.,20 days after the issuance of the mitigation document. I Published in the Valley Daily News on ' (April 1, 1991. Acct. No. 51067. 5568 — --- 410 t% Y.,CI OF RENT ON saLw{ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator May 8, 1991 Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Compliance Division METRO Exchange Building 821 Second Avenue Seattle,WA 98104-1598 • SUBJECT: Final EIS for the Black River Corporate Park Dear Mr. Bush: We received your letter of April 15, 1991, commenting on the Final EIS for the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII. You had two principal concerns: a) the FEIS section on unavoidable adverse impacts from odors generated at the enlarged Wastewater Treatment Facility; and b) mitigation measures suggested for joint implementation. between Metro and the Black River Corporate Park developers. Your Draft Environmental Impact Statement states that offensive odors could occur as a result of mechanical failures, system emergencies or an unlikely combination of weather and operating conditions. We understand that METRO will be incorporating the latest technology and operating methods to avoid offensive odors which might travel beyond the plant's boundaries. In recognition of that effort, we have issued an errata sheet for the Black River FEIS. It will correct the paragraph you referenced in your letter. The following paragraph will be substituted for paragraph 3 on Page 3-62 in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, Black River Corporate Park VII and VIII. Offensive odors could be generated from the treatment facility and extend beyond the boundaries of the site, even with METRO's proposed odor control plan. These odors most likely would come from mechanical failures, emergencies, or system upsets, or, infrequently, unusual circumstances during day to day operations. These odors have the greatest potential for crossing Tracts A and B when the prevailing winds are from the south and southwest. We feel this objectively addresses an environmental impact of importance to both the public and the Hearing Examiner. The correction is consistent with the information in your Draft EIS (March 22, 1991, MITIGATION p. 5-12, 5-13, 5-14, 5-15). It is also accurately reflects the independent research performed for the Black River EIS. The mitigation measures proposed in the Black River EIS were your second concern. As you probably know, the City of Renton usually prepares a mitigation document for each project under EIS review. This document follows the EIS and has a twenty day appeal period. This allows time for the applicant,the City, the public and other interested parties to discuss the mitigation measures prior to the public hearing by the hearing examiner. If measures would need changing, interested parties may file an appeal of the mitigation document. The Hearing Examiner would then hear their appeal and make a decision,taking into account the testimony received. We believe this process provides for the coordination suggested in your letter. We are certainly available to help facilitate a meeting between Metro, First City Development Corporation, and the City of Renton if that would aid in the coordination prior to the appeal period. I hope this addresses your concerns. If you have questions, I am available to discuss these items further with you. Please do not hesitate to call me at 235-2550. el ours, Donald Erickson,AICP Principal Planner Development Services 1 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 4mETR&Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 April 15, 1991 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON APR 161991 Mr. Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator RECEIVED Planning/Public Works/Building Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Final EIS for the Black River Corporate Park Dear Mr. Erickson: We recently received a copy of the final EIS for the Black River Corporate Park and would like to bring a number of items to your immediate attention. As you know, the final EIS includes a discussion of Metro's treatment facility, which is located adjacent to the proposed Black River corporate park. Unfortunately, some of the information presented in that discussion is not accurate and some of the statements are misleading. One of our principal concerns relates to the section on "unavoidable adverse impacts" of the expanded Metro facility. This discussion does not appear to recognize or take account of proposed mitigation measures. For example, the discussion on odor impacts found at p. 3-62 states as follows: Even with Metro's proposed odor control plan, offensive odors will be generated from the treatment facility and extend beyond the boundaries of the site. These odors will occur as part of day-to-day operations and most likely from mechanical failures, emergencies, or system upsets. These odors have the greatest potential for crossing Tracts A and B when the prevailing winds are from the south and southwest. This discussion does not accurately reflect the conclusions of Metro's consultants or the discussion in Metro's draft supplemental EIS. Metro's' EIS concludes that odor impacts associated with construction activities can "be effectively mitigated by proper timing" of those activities (draft supplemental EIS, at p. 5-10) and that under all of the proposed alternatives, odor impacts from daily plant operation will not be significant at the Metro property M1f111 Donald Erickson April 15, 1991 Page Two boundary (pp. 5-11 to 5-15) . To suggest that "offensive odors" will occur as part of "day-to-day" operations" is simply not true. We also have concerns regarding some of the mitigation measures proposed to be implemented jointly by Metro and the First City Developments Corporation. While Metro is willing to participate in such joint mitigation, we believe that there are better ways of coordinating such efforts than suggesting the mitigation for the first time in a final environmental impact statement. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. We would be happy to meet with you to discuss these matters further. Sincerely, )001-44.-A-e2-67 ;LA-7-17 Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Compliance Division GMB:ymg cc: John Spencer Joe Fernandes 1116 , ,,, � CIT F RENTON „ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator April 4, 1991 Dear Interested Party: Due to a possible collation problem at the printer's, the FEIS you received may have been incorrectly put together. To reduce any possible confusion this may cause, we are sending corrected copies to you for your further review. We ask that you dispose of the original copy you received. You will kindly note that the new document has a different colored cover. Thank you for your forbearance. Since there has already been time for review,the comment period time will not change on this. EP -ly, Donald K. Erickson,AICP , Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • . • •.,:,',..,:4g.. g•:.'.',"...", .., ,,, ,..„,-,,i;.„.•.t.,,,.\ff.',.4, -•-, -..'7••••":•r"•7'C''''' ,..----, .-AA , .,,,-.'.iv 4.tat i.a.i,•ti.,. ., • .,..,,,,,. „ , .. .,,.....,..,...it 4-*.„.,,,,47-4.,•,,,•::''y4..k.,,;.*.a.A'.• .-• - , • •-,,- , ,..,,„,„ ,,,,,,,,..-mr.:17 •• '4`0„.Tylfbktglatql,,,.:*,,,-',.' .•,'''oi-J.c;-'A--4,0.- 1,'Ar'-5,,,,c-r-,,,,,' -:,', ' --'-----, ' . -•-• ,.,.,....,..4 ..„,,,, :pi v•vs-xl„oxitv,.L,',...1.1.-74.74,A .0•, ,011,---,44.i,-•tAlto.•,..,-•tr,,-,1,,,,••). ., i c.,4„,,,,1 ,, 1„...,,' '' ,.,,,,„ , ,,, „„,k14,,,,,,h 'V; .,i,s1--v4.?y,,m.?r,4114.,'•IV% ..-rirg4i4 rgc•I si "• "Irsirr -,„••'.•4'.*/, •qs,1,41k3VIVAMA0.40j.,'-','I• . • , ,iv.,,,..i...4.-,,...„,....0,4„:•s,„4„;e,,,l.,y„,. .,„,.: 4.1...,.. :.,. ,..,. ,,,,,,„,:k. .1..i1-.,,„int,,k,,iti.P.,„,,. . '''''..:%,•40'.,t.' WrIal,,AA0;4?:,.',',04.."4.40,,iN",':(11.4... vo'd,,,,..1,14107',..M.'7,. t„.,'',,ft,,,vg,,,- .',rv.•• 4 40,','',,,,,,*14,--,,/,,'' _,,t9t, ,FiC4ri.,A144#41.,1',,.:,,c,14:./','I Al .. ,,41,-..,,m,,,l, ,,4›: i .,,I0:,,,.„..0....., ., .‘..u.,,,,...a,..,..‘":,,,,,,,, .4 ,,' :.,..1, ,-..,- .,, ....,,•,,, ;,.,....rq.Nfli',1 T.., '1 i 1: 10,'z'll.;;;, Vri' ,..s. `-,--0Q,,I.'ill''..."..., .ei,4.',,41:,.,,,. ,1;4:•,I'.{4,r 4,,,,i,...-.,,,, ,.....1...,..,,,,..,,i*,',11:r 4ei,-4..,„.),4-, ...ArA.,..,,,,q,,-,.'1,'••' .. .,.,, ..,,,,.„. . 0.0'-.-.., N. 4.ii,.„ !,4x..-, .4....4„?‘ , ,.A . '44'1' ',, 441A t.-4,,,,,-.„„,-,,4,,• ,.-,;,„ ,f,,,,,,,,w A '•z•••• ••-• -1, -, , . 4„..„,1461,41.,4%•:?..qic•m.„iltik,24 • rt,':•-4•K''Ai,• •-•,-,40,leu•.v-1-i't4 ,,,,.,,, -„ 4,1•11,>. ,A•'to.-•-• „,,,,,•-.0.,,._.L .4 4,),,j' -4,',,g1' 1,14'•'''",,M:';011441444V"il*,4 J.,,11.'ff rit,l'Y'',Z'''''':'441',' iv 1. 1;•tilig; .',?Z,. F ',,r4••.,.1.,e's :'"••-,I `"- ': ': 1;-,se„,..0,g, .7,r1,p,'L's",'ikit, .4ir. F.'44'1';'0.'t•''.,f41 t... ''''lt,),tp0.0§V,RAtf•,••,,y,',11,-'•3;fipil:;,i,i,r)f7i4;fi'!..:!,' •)• 15z-,",,,„` 4:, ,,v,„ 'k,.,114,.,1„,,VY,1,1' fir.7,h r'i h'-l•yt,04elif;..•":?:%,' A'„,41.'f,-:f 11;',:it,Nlirikir., , 4,41,41v^,7*,mi*,:,,iy.),.?(,,,.,i:::1,,,, ._; . '111..,,„,44!„1.1 ,zif:y.5./:-..1/41,:,,,,,,,,i4 •••,..,5.. ,i,:, ..,,,,r,g,',,r,...:4,4:' 4.'.,71.„,i'l"..'''''14,,4A.V.1,..4,,,*-4P1-:,E.t.,'.7.-\'*j:4...•'Veil:L;:'4°'r..:41104-47‘;'Alluriki:ei—ite'l '41P4117V17:r:44131.:411__1.:'.14'.."-C'611.1.7." '::4•1'''':'..nryfi'A...-, ,•;,:a:•,;.•7'-'1,''' - .i•w-V: •"0,,ii. N•tp' hi'-s--y 3,K 24,,,-i A ,,,I,.,,..,,o.rl:,. :i ,..i,4 •,1.7.. Vt 'N."\"5',049, ..17f',(4,.tl-i r%,,,- t'...,t,,^.,.„....a...,4',•4":;,!,-,.L.,z;.....'1.n,&.:,'`.,-:,,A.?N„--,AA.,''.Z'.f.,17t.'N1't...ti,,i'N;:t7—s.':;.'..o-";";•".:,,,'.,.,,V-,,-:.:,.-,-1. ,...-'...1')t7',,:,.',',,:4.r,I t.•'•-',,7•--.•,.7:,t•1•1iki.)1‘,,• 1'41. 1W5.0.•1.'p9''4'1•6y 6.1h-i,il41t,1 1',:44411 '1„14„1.41„,,,,,,,„§ ,1.1,1,„.•.,,, •.-,,,:,,,,,,,,„„ ,,,:..,..,,..,,,- ....i,...;,,,,i, ,„,4, ,.,...,„ k,,•1 • !,..:A.„,t‘iitit,„s.,....:5 1..';';' ;'•3': 09* V-Pli 1 •-'-'1,i• ,i 'f', -finplf!,,1 4r,',0,.:..i.fpr.-\.^:':. ?,..::: \\\. ..., ';'..\*,. *..-,‘'A f:::•1 , .,. vd. yd.30.#14'., 1, , r'f"1.,k,$w •;,,,,tflAp ,..40,,,-,":,4;;$:•,, .,.1 •.. 4,„,..tiv,41,4,itiy -:,,,,,,,1, 0,7`,. ..... , ..,,h?• .', ' ,...: '..:...' • • ....0% '—' ',•,*,,,,,,..„1„,,t, .. . •,, •,• . 2,,,J.,,Noi,e,,..:1,,,lip ir.gt,04,4,, •,• ..• 10,,,,..:40,,,a,,,,,,*...','*, "AN...7:n... ....,-•. ,,,\•:•,.,..,,,,,,,,,,.,\••„... .„,. .,,,ok,...,Niiii., ,•.\.31,,,p,,,0,1... .._ .^.,',1,,,,,1,,t!,.%04},c,,,,,,,g,,,4...A. c f t-.-1-lip:/pcillir ivt!..1'.1. ..".','.• s\•". . ..; 'y:'''.'..,.;,- .',.:tr„,;•:*i .,:l k. •'•••z.., ' .,. •.•:kkA,V4'.4ft al ':-2:44-..i.FigIVi$,,IN,•,i,v trf,,,flertr400.4Aw 7:••••,'4;‘,,,' ••••'••',.. ••,‘•,'• •••;••• •••• s•,i7;:-.OW'..2.1 '''' •'3Q,VV4'''',- ' '•',"."'lig(A•3 0- , , .,,,4•,:t-t,o, ...4,.!,,,,,4,0;,,rt„„v.:Kr A••• ,,,,,:ttIm.,•,;*.•1•,;-; ,,,......•••, : • .. •:,,,,.. , ,„,....,•.:, t......,•..:.:„,...... , I .•4.r.vt.N.,..t.mt,,I..,1 l'•.4•': ',•••;;" .sOt',..1'q'il li),t10,"•t-,..'7.7•-t.•;.'t.'.-.21. .a.,,,,,,,. 1•,_,0,.....•.1..!*4.. 4..t.','•'••,''•:`..'t;',.,,,,',.--.::,``.st.,‘ •••,.A''..; ,. . ,A. .,,, ,. .•• .• i!.Ipt'.4i.t,..1•,1., •,••,klii;:) a) k-,.,;;•!, ,,,„, •f•!•], ...,,,,,,,,,.il.. ,;. ;,,y 4,ZI„e.cri,,<II??.4,7147Jr-r,,,Ii'y .....,:‘,•::-.‘:,....t.,•;-,:.:;4.it-'4.., • . ,• ,Ii 1,•.y1;.•,•• .....,.,i.....4,.1.0c,...,...:, l'_,..,..„.,, ..004i.414„i al :::?-•7.,*.•;7-qi•Ao " •: A;;;;.;•!•;',41,',76- 4.'",'„....2*,'' t.7...;4',..':.., L,).4k-."1/2... .:;•••,:•,•4;• ....•.,".:.,.,•' •..-•:,, :••,•',,:•:•••„t t„::,•.;•..s..,,,,. .,-,!•-,4,..,q, a.• .... •c .., ,..:',,...1 02,5:,,•qi,\4„, -4., 0 1'f,•44•11.4..... .,..„,Ar...., 44,.,,,t;•• ' .. -.••'..A• ••••:7•• •L.,\t"•., •• ''..P,r,i,tti,:.,..0 4-.10,t,,-to':v.T.: • .. - -•,—,v•Ii i',3:f V".' i \to CI. i ri,:i.v,,,;•.4,.. •••• : ••.:...•.Q• •,,.,;s.,',e..-::." ,.. :.e:-...'N ti •. •-•.:•.-. •. :, 'kbtfi):•;•:::•-r;'''Al.. ,.--1:.'..•:.?'1,...7,•14,,, ',`.,47,,t,•.:!'Al,r. ., " „s„;....•.;, .,, ir.e.:,,r•-,.4......,;,. „..... ,.:,.•.,..4.:.•.,.-.,., 1.. •..., .••,:,,•• .•••. px.e4k'N,p43.t.:-1,2 z.:i ; ,-.1."E•'..-..A-:-ii•Fai,)fo--,,,,A,',- , — ••d'• 't,,•,.,P-•':,,,,,r:r. /1'IA,-••..,..;,--1?•,,,,,Avg,c.\,.• .,,•wW.4,0,, ;),I.,,,..4,,, .'..0i-• •giliMI'`lizree , o 0 1 4.' 401,,,,;..IV(„0.4141,!...4:''..".„,-`504+4 It'2714,1 iri.. '••'•''1...',44: ..i...4.'W..NM11-°...k y, .,. 4.:,,•:".,.,r ;•,•,..",...4.44 k-i,,,,,.4 ... • •,,, .!.!,4,.-;,•01 9, - •eix,...ci,•:•••.--.•••1•-,'!-„,.- ,, ....•-,..0 Al..•' ., '.•..:6,,4,,,,,?„,i0-1,T::0,)-4•4'.",:',*ok,,.4,•,, ,,A r,'., ',,:f.1.4,,,•\',•.•••itt5..',• 1._ 3 kry ,. '4,;,,V,i.""trig5;4•;.,'"•• g.4.,..8V.4!...1?1•,.A\'ii ....,:''''''.V,/ .204.f,"A).'iliV...1,c.cf(}'ic• ' 4."-11, i4,:>;•• •,-1,. "v , - .! 0 :•,',11,,. .41'SI.;Wr 4" . ''42,;,..).VgAg,,,•,..",',2{,•!;1"4,s:.,.'•'..-;• '4'. ;s's.•:g3.;?0,!.,.4.'iv;i1".",.:.;•,'" ".30, 4(."twig gii? .. .,•:-.•'.. . s.t k,,,,, i Pr../:? ' 'Ft' 4,..,.."?1:1..:'""i'.13•14.4•,FN&I,t1/4''s.r‘4,.‘'3."•g!';'''.4s'lig . /14'fral4,44..ct• •• ,11),V.4 -1.-(t 4,, .'''''''''' '4,•' , ,, ;,! *c . 47A -7••••,.%':!,i'r\-' 7',.•‘t'244-:i.,', :•;.,,t,;',1,„.',t`'f', ,. , . 1e'10.4. ;44';:fSt.it :;,;;.,,, .•••: .•• ...,., ‘',Vii -- ; :',..4',....;'!'...i..1.••?.'4;',4'61.7,.t ft4•'.4.••‘•:.kz..,..i7..i,of,$•'••• ,', ',. V ...0••••• r i„c'•.j vZ,' 4.4'11' t 1‘ , .,...ezl,'.•.,..L.1 , ire el.t..A." ..,,, —. ••,,.,.i., t,t f. ,•:1•:,-• ca .1 vi ,,, , • ,•,•,•.;,,,,„,,,, ,.0,.,..“,,N,NA;•i,,.....4 Ai v't ,,4r 0 • zill'•IA' 49'. '''.0 :4:):ii 7 14.44.7 El •,, .. *'' 4. • „...N.,,,,,v,,,„../. i )'•,;:•,r3..1.k:.24,. • ,, •,,I.:.1,.* • .,,,. ...•N ::Li ,,,-,/. . • ,.. ,•tt.e,:.. • ,,gi's.1 '(lc')", ,i4i'4,1',,.4.•::.i'.,%'"!,,...g,ki...VA1/4.5.4ki.,4 i• '''.;1;:•,.!,;•,4411, ., . 1.14,)!,!`•,!1.`t?'),S4,'"•.• 'f' ':' • e e. ,.. ,. .. ;fp itrik ti , ,..4,'........, ,e2:,-4'4..)40.4..,e,T..4:•., 1. ..., . 1 : ?Ati*:.;;!,..,11,,.,,,4 a ,.1..... ..1,1.!,• 0 c , v..::. pi: • i ',. 4 ',,,•,,I, lv,,V .. .t .• •76.‘4"'•?'''''''..".'AD ''''''t,— • ,••••• .41441,rs'., c r1.1:7'.1' ir ...i,.;‘, .,,.,,I•k,•4f.,,,,,7,1.„,.. itzt.•!..• co 0 ,„36 0. : ,4,p?' '..,7 iPi:',*•;•,,Z,•,n,,,z,v;;;?.....,':•.W....41, . ,11'..,t. ziailii‘ . . , , . . ,•\, .,7,,,t-ck•{'01*\•,•4,i'osiN, •:;‘,..,... .. ti',Nil "q1 1/°. '.i. f itt 0 .,.4•*.f•0.‘' • C . , , ,NI:,,Tr,**'•Ve)•, ./i,ols'i•'.:4!'t,4',VOZ'''. ' C'•' ',1., kf', ,:l .,,,,,k,A,,,,, •$,k,,, ..• . ,:ik.,,,..F,,,TN),,,,z*,,,,osINAN7%,/,.:•••.,:., ,,,!.,.N,*i'v:0,gzpk:•-,I..!,,..• 40..).,,,,,,,:, ,. ..,, ,.. cd 0 ..• •„!. i f",r• -1A.verx 4**\\••\*.t,IN •'•,;',i,r4'•:(:,‘:46,17.1%:.',4%.*40'.'•,"W".44:tif',..iN,'„v:.'iNt.;•,),'N',\\.,,..n..c••:•q,,4,14-i'.1/4\.1..‹:,1!,..,,,1,..4",,:-. ',44•••••••P,•„' • l' ' 4i"il •',•••• 4° ,,4t.lip , . .. i •,, . •,6,1,p,.,- ,d, .P.• 14 , 41€''.\'''g'''''.7.4.\''...;;:4!.17444'...;41;r;\\*14,V44..1q,?I'vl,A,4 R,Att,,.,;','I.Akt''':.i44.''44"Wk'''jOjt'a'el'i,?o'f,,',t:4''s''i?•>.t,'4'''':44?'kt,'t'st.t'.'f"•''Jsti6.4V , ,,,t,,,,,, 414, . .74,„.,A4,44,,,t,K),X4.1.44,14,1:4,''',;,14;4 ',44*.teek.",4,10...\,b4.'0V.•N..•.‘.,.:,.,..,1-<ew•••1\ • '. '•f.'1,-T. v..* 0 kOhlt‘.."' 4:',W4t,‘,"*,1'' •,. ' ''''S. 1.40t.Rt,A,44.44,!.1P,,,I4ZIA‘1%•,4i'f,,,NN,A,52,47'Y:t.,iVi.',0•41.4‘.4,,,..''.N,''.•-: v. ,m,.• ‘. • ..., rf . ,,,, „ . *f 46.. .. l' • '0 t' `'.\- 'Pr,.'''..'41:. .''.'''*, tAtz. ' •/.•„>,"„,, Vt,V,Nt47,..ValVeAlt.:,,44z4X•Z,,,,•:,••;;:•."0:1;:51:qg•:;;;X:pilo.,f•••;\:•;t:::7;1 fty•s,. ,•,,,i/ s... ,i• H l';',..'. ',1.1,Clii,,4•'P/ ••%,'•rf,t".‘ti, --,,-"*''''"''' ...,..itto,'4"444%\.*:VVIi.t*:.;IVrig'i,'1*.tV$14V',4....".'lkOt .:'17.r ...:'..it.P;:s• , i 't.y.,1.....:Z„..„ ''''''''44. ,,..:'41(6,1';',';`.'4)....;.s., '1,t,,,i(. ••••'..7,::".(i'‘,..,4,-"mit;;;?,'...,...,;,•4,44X...‘%.„\to.ki?•,:g,,, kiNcw, .. '...,,,. ...."1,,z.• ,•,--4. 4 g<c... . , , - (_) ,,,, .,,...1.,-,. . , ,...- .-..,..v.- 0,,.,..0,,,_14,..,,i, ' i •••• 7 It 7Vt. ;Ii..44 'A:','''...ItVi..,(.3.'-,.tiZ41,-,..ler', .. ..;',41.'1‘v.'..' ..^.pt5,'.'•7,`•.. ..!. -z+4,,z,44..v,141w„a‘N, t__..C4 ., .0 t • C.) rt-",-t,1. (.7,'14 ;€41:,...,'7),•,i, .•,\,...,...,\Isgel,t}i,) •104.„7z),,,i,•#...'.. 'ti.'•;•;,4;',,A,-ri44-7•'#-..,,'t iii,;.4 4217--'$.‘szv..!tvx\i- 44.q1b,• di:•7A ( _0 .• g g,,, ' •s .‘"kokt,'I. 514 CoAs..,, .4.,..,-..1•1,74/$4'"..„„/„..114;,;,;(4"t" g•t•g.4 •••4 e,t..".,11,Tk.4 111 gy. ',NAN, :. ,m,.....••,.. -. , Q) 1 ii4k::;',.':.' . . 'v„.:pk.,,,,it.R. ,of ,,,,, •• ,, , . ...g.„,,,T,,,",..4fy •,,, ,,t,„\'. ,„,, ,,,,i • :,t•.4,••b, . •- k, -.••lt,,,,,,,,, . •r?,,w„ •:,:,,,•of,,,,,, , ,'7,p ,\:•,r••,.4.,,A• IN...4,4;4y'-,7 4,t'Y...."' 7'4#,.";,0.4..iz„.•••••• 2.';,•14*7.,...:7..' , -At.4:1011•,..'. u) . ••V.,`‘.• ' ....').OP,"''''.',WegAiL???,7i tthi'''' )"'14%:4-'4°4.44 4.$.1.‘‘4'..Siiti, ,,,‘A'''''•-.41.'" ''''''.4.7,7^..'.%4,Ir 1 ...'1,4.',$S-r' "..f iiiP411 ‘.g';';•:1 il :..:1 g,...1.7 ,.. 's 1 .s... 4 1 .x c s it.i 4," 1, t.„•,,,t.,. i.,,0, ,44,,'I .11,,,,N • A .1,A., t.,'• -• "0 ...-- ,....t..•.„- l '''s"."N•.. ...$414$451'stii• "I";lir'4s.s4''.4r'I'g 4 I" cr417444 4 Pi414•:4r' ' I ''''i'4''''t'i.31t.l''' ‘..3$.Tt•g.'', ig 0 g,li ‘,;, ,I'N•,"Nr lkji,t4040,011)7 ''41 , ,,,tk!•',:'f3"„,41 .''s!.IV "I 1,.1,4:440 1st-irk' .1::,:.,,,,. • el,,,,re3ts. q', 73 7, ','4,,....1P4vJiVIV.,iO4.1?,,,Al`...,'i',. •1/Mft•fc! ','',.',ii. ").N":"'•.,i-..111,67,)0,,.'41,;,„'it.'.• 1,, 2 :',',,,ijfk,,,,,4,,,z.,,..ec ..,..4; ;'.iriipi‘ ,•• .,,,,,.,;•„?.. c , .., I;:,:, -.,,- I iii•t,..;4.,.%tlf,‘,z4.4.1.4),v:..„,....N. .(•441,:y\,,,y,„ ',,,,,4 -ftt c.".;•„0.,4 ,7',,,ifp',1- 1,"cfel? ;•1,,;.x.".I:.: ,...): q.310,....;,,,,.,. a) ..4-0. :;-klifii,F.-At,a,...c.N.,,,,i,,.4,..:*,,.apkr;rt-RA%,,,,,,-,„,,,,,,, .::,....,'1,,,,,,0:.41.4.,,,, it, Altc f fr .--:,,i./J.,,:,,-Ahr•• '.1,1,''' E .; '4;41.2 Agtlipi:,i,.;i:N..,,,./.,4,i, ,e.„,...,w,. :4,,..,,,v'•1.,Fir,..1, ,,,,k,e.;,...,400,-i:1,:, ,- „:,1 I.A.F.,,. • . ... g..,0e„,,pf,-..„.....t.is. E • 4 rr'',&' l'q;'...v•J'!...7, '41,;11:r#710•gig ripix,rii$Aok" •,l't,;Ylnils•14, ,f1, ,?,, . ,I:?''11,• c-•e: it:,4051•.,.,•1.::,:- iii ft,3%.,'-t,')','-,i,,,,:7,,ik.,^0.‘t4t,',sill.i•mor..4 1...',..';',X4-,41, A4.., '„,4) •t.,..‘', .1r..iti.e wy,„ •i'4,. .,-, ,1,-,!, •.,.. ,.•,r.:A.,''I,'" ',10:,;;•;!',"..s.'., 0 0 .4.,.,•:, , 4':i.i .',40'..1,^40 111.ikV...,,''P.P. `,0,,li,P,',:••14' ,' ,,..••,•• ••',11- ,,,,,,,f 4 pr. ,,, 1.P-4, .,i, •, ,.. l'i .. •,•01.•••••-; t.•/...1!' "t„it:t...4.11.st,,.„...r.:4/41*g,dit„,41.1444,"1.,',,;k:',.,.41 lc. ." s"',gil? f,i'Org'.1.", ,4...., fi 1,4I/FA,„,,s‘,(.1.. . ,414, „.. 4.:,,,,,,,,..... a) Fei•Fle:nR, ,;%:Ve, ,rev•vi,o47:roW7.4,04z4P„,:p•A-,..',,,k 1,.i.,v„,,,••,,„ . .41$4,,•,,i,N1,.. . y,p.:,./40,t, •; e 1,:k-if i,f, •••••,1,,,:. - cc ..,!,44'`,3,`". .'11.4'144.4..4,4.; 4 Ai. . ,[44,,',4'14o,41•44-1.ir4fi,V4011,1•4.'X&44#'•:,..411.•mqpiti.,•'11,..*,f •;,•44:, ; .. ,,,4,,.......-.?„,,t,-- ,.. ,, ..„ lst...,4k,.,:q,:-,PA.::‘,4• ,. •,(i,',,t).A.1?;4-4•N(.,,,,i411.•';,,,,,li,), ..!) .:4y41,,, ,..ifiv. ,!it,,,..,:frA,,...0,:v.ip-,•,-, u) 't •'-' ., . • - ,-..,,-.1 •,.., . .•'..f JA'''t A ..w tt, k •...1..... ,.“.• ,‘ ..t.•1 I*. „#•; ,....,' r,.... k • ka a) ',..: ! ,,k gt....., ,,..!,s3",,,s...,:,..4.,. ,1 g, .g,f,,o,, •,,,,..„,,,go 4,,,, ,..;0„,,,,/s-Igy't ..iss , (AV*;Azta'' ", 1\;. ,-;.,. ,,.. ; V, ;:54A.0.'0,COW1..$4,1 EV .,,,,,,,,,,44. ....1g447N31.1,0,.of'.1=" •y,.";:t 1...,, 4 r .ft- A /..,i'... '',••A ...vA'' &._ n - •.'7,"'- ''•Uis'AZ*1/4:•41$3P4t,•:,,-"f: .,•••aWsl•f•,,,..;1 Kre•44,a,t.,14 ,'.'tj k .1,''.4. Fe t,.',;-4r'.• Z.' ,., i',,,'3,v. 4-, t,z.jr,..,.t:tir. if:1,::•'',:`4,.,,:,,1,:<#.57, '.,,c1.13, 40‘5., •'iNii.;..'e' .'.i.c..4.9'...' is ' 4,-. cr• i , ,4i4i, as .., it(..1 . 1:4 iiiI:AY*....4 1,,•,,,.• ,,,:, '$4f..• 11,. .J.' 4,4) 0\ 40,'Ar i .1.$41', .1;`,4.-• .4,„ot: , he.kitt G) ' .1444,,...:..,c.,, t•tr .,,,,, • . i.,,4110,3.f. • :,..,1 .1, .,,, ,-, if', 1 •••• .. ..,7/ ••A.-. : If • LL '.4 r• ' .".ite%)kl.y,4'.‘r tA,,X., !r.'k't,...i!„..a11.. ,I,u'......,,, ,::4.- , itk 4,;,,l, .,,h c• ••1,•.v, ,,,E,- ':'...,7•?7,1.•<.• ,...VA,I4 ..\lg.')'‘.... ,..".I;00,4,,if ii'.'' ' ,4).i /..- 40./..tiu.,, 2"..,M'-.1`:.",.. .,'k:',t',i. .'1 ,q4 -c-a .) I 'I, .-'ri ..-4.1;,..4 l' ,.....ii,'..4.,,, .',1144'4,011,.% 'C. .' g'ii4's. ' Pi il,C4.;.'1'..,'.4 1,14Z1 ,,..-.1.- 4• • se4i 1:,17,,,:',' •:.•1:,.., 0-. 4k.v.:;,.. :14.,t, -,41,..0•47,, ,,,,,t.., :.• ,• •.4 .,•,,..,,,.!leer )„,i.,...,.. , ...,...,i •-,.., , ....-;,,,,arc•-.,,i t.....`ikikir:.:i' ..,I1A "',IA:•t1;0*,.Arto.;.,.,'0,..;"':''''''''"•314 w„0.41,i'.1 .::',...,V.`:".i. ... .,..A,...-,..ti,.;• o•-•.. c \c, a, cp ••• ii,•,. '•:`.',..,,;104?.y,V3.?g•-• ,/-14.4.3.5'ik T.,i'f...;\10,1r,pf, ?,',/iii.•4'4,1i,ftly rftl•E;•• '•17,•'•4:1::•L'•., <•",':'•?,k,t2,1!•' a) 4- E !•e,• % .•-•,,..,..,:o 1..6„)..0,,i!i::‘„,..,,:ez,votx,i,,,,,,,,,.51•iqkieloute,..:',,,,,,fi •''•giNe4442 ..,,::.,. = ....:4:.,:le.,...w.- ,14;4,10; ,At.1,-botf'al rog,,K ,0 KN,N.p.,... i:ili *.1 -r..;),••' - • A .14-''OYA74 .A' C .t"' 1 %S.'',.,??,,i:-11 A.0,1'4 44.14'..," 4,N.r1r4''A ft...teor "A'..•14..r.,ie A,.'c' lt^441 .',':, ''': . — ...tr,"!•I:'A ',,,''':.2 o , 1,.L.,,A v?,•kOlf,air,'',e4;at.,31)4:4:1,41M f,,-14`..40!.=.41 Pi 1.,•1,1;:'q tut..';$.„„ ••. .. ,ito ,,...,.••: ii.t 1.-. N„,1my,,i0 ,,,,,„..,,,, ..,;,,,,,,,,,,:01,0. .„ '',....4.wi,,,k44/re ri,'IT.,tit..4'.4.4.,..1, i;04";".0, . • ' ".4.004'' '44's''.'/,‘,..ki:',"..04,'.41,4 ',..:: ''''' 1041%41 4r., 4.03,,,,,:, .4, 4.4 4....,4:,,,,,,,, ' 4.4,,,,• ., . 0 .›.--' C,1 4 ..tf,,,f.A.,4419.',..,,4-37',..ke,.."A4:,t4irr 4'. ' ...,,,V,I.A' ,•'?•'/0'1,04'f0.,All'41Viir_t`' ;tAir 1 •••••. I .`,.‘tie. • ,,e7A--;`',W°k <=,- C v ..., ,:,.';‘, 1 '1.3'''''''':'^''''''?",l'•4`. 1'.'g::.%*",=:;",„t Vga,'f•s' P' • ''' V, -,,,, tkk"43,,,,.•'144,1'• .' 14. 44tr',4 1)4 t.'': .\y • Ci.';'•:: fttil",,..4.1!III 4-• f..1,IP • ,..in4;g•:''.'44'1'- '•:4;(1'4'-'eF''.•i':':i c •,,co ,,,„.... .':•,';',, A,i!,,v.,„.1's' 4 li,k,(lailifr 0"4'.'ke r„•'?'••"•Yi'''''''-:4 /- , , .•/44:4,-4\:. 4.1..i111 :.'•re.;Iii,I 0 ;‘,.•":,, '''.'1/2"A,'•ig,;4•';',i/,;/4,',I••',,g''' its'tfil•'4Aist• g,,6,'f,•4,1,34. ,q,,,,,,A i-,)-4, i. 4,... - .-eisit..:,,,t. • -,..:,.. . ..-...,::, . :•; ;is ,' i'fi-,:;..ilt'ipr.,17,1,4.",1,,e,f1.10,0,.. •,.,'i.,itill-, ,,,,Ii..744...,e 1,r;•,.. i ,.• i'1,74„i,,,p a 1,., •-p.ir•:.•u.0 i 1, 0- l'iv•''' "4:i1;4414.',..,..JIC.f'00;14‘;ttit 41;''''''64eSer•Itlityl.,:l'IP v.Vil' ' ,::Y;),,kietpy. i:,;;.,;:,;:... , . el r 1 i....e,,:4 ''Q'''Vitili,l''''''rk,',K '14N:t ;i,k`ir iy,).11V07,,,'?,,kr ''.:'40 :!,!':,;„•1,e, ..44.9,,tivzvek.tyl 1,f.,,,J.;.,:....:-.:,.:,.• - ._ cr) c? ;,•••;%.,„;;•, INAftf/,'No A 'i . i'el. f '1. '...-44`,4,1'.444/.4, ,.4.4....4,',;t:31'.44• $44"."'44411 O. ",'14" ••,".V.",.','•'.. g '. ' 0- ... A'',,-'CV:g,A,....A... .•44. '..„,441 .4,.'`,1''yi ei,iftii• ,I4'. l',:.`1. •'''''• '''''' 4,01,1,01','I:'"44,' ...i!"...,;;;.:•:,.'•. ::-.''. ' t.4 '),....'.70.1. ; '1.:1,414'.'''4P;',,;4, ', ' ';'''''. Ai00(04g.44'a':',;;,.5;0,'r .6: ,\,,,,,••,;0';;; \!„..-; ,4„,,,Tot ,,,,,,... •.,. 14":;,', .f , - f':::g:nil ',.‘,..*),Crp, 1 ,,- ,i"Att •,r,',Opt 1.4'::).,...,:;:qi",•k,•• ,4 • , ,.1+. .:,,cii; ,:! , .•.• N• '. ''''4.4••••:''''illF11•1411-Att','',gitiell•'s 4.°54.!trAtell...44 4'41'4'4;0.t.';', . f' ...P.X.. ilk.is".6". ;"1..'1•';'... • 0-' CO ..t'':,.4..?!..• ,1:,''..1*4.4t(*.lfrVir;' %,,,.. 'S ''' '-,44,N.A-.,..!..yt,•;,..d„,,iD':4.,-1. •':. . ,'h 14''.,M!., ,!'"4,,!;'..,:.' -.' • . -: • a) , ,. .,•,..'i. %..i'..:.,-, -..,z•. ....w.;;;J„,,g,,,,,ms,a,),ft-,114•,. ,I n;rit.•,..11;),1,,i; •:•....•f ,,,•„ r „Tr tt hiiii7:m "....,...,,..... .„,....,.„..... . • L._ ',•,;A:.). '1,•,M11,'-'!"-,q1;,:-1.,W,,,,?p,;:it::,1,1,14„ff..... .pi,10.•*.oiy,,A.:4,,,6";,`,..11,,r,'!..,•:',71:,i 1,. ',, '',''',. 't 4 oft .:ii.,';'.*,---...„,..,i....„...„ Al = i'••%,0e•••,•• fitii,„4„, •••-•.N,,,,':,-:,,,,,,,..-,•=/:-•••.,p4z,eyg.‘, •......;..,11.4iiiittikt...it;,1., —'4. t il A,lc ' '''' . ' '.'.'''''''''- , . '0",,',`I.:,%;:,'•, , ..!''''''_;;;;.1,..1::,ij.'‘..„'WL,'''.? [1..at'• ' . . •.•..- 4••4 . ' 1 itc";,'.0„;. , f",2s .40 ' r414,i`,$-', of pi IIII p i pi RV IN 1111 01 OW 111 11/ 14 /1° RI III • • 1 Hh �{� ' V#-'(-A". I� DISTRIBUTION LIST i i[i ill Iii.Feral // ✓ ' U. S. Environment l Pr tection Agency Region X . U. S. Army Corps of)Engineers X I s;: x � � U. S. Fish and Wldlife Service V V U. S. Soil Conservation Service I X I / /0/-6ce ef. Gvt...c.00v--Y '' A ‘, tale -�- � ��.�� of Ecology (SEPA Register) , sir Department (Re-el wt of Natural Resources YN Departmentm.4_,) 1, 4. ,, �. Department of Wildlife G-e. D -, �,®L ; Transportation Department of /KMC� Department of Social and Health Services `� & A-e.. it Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation x, Public Archaeology, University of Washington v�o su * Office of . Puget Sound Water Quality Authority v X ;�� g ' x . Rggional ' • & : Metro - Water Quality,Division/ye/ t Metro - Transit. V X 7 - ti� ;, Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Puget Sound.Council of Governments / X 1,3 ,,, Seattle - King County'Department of Public Health✓ . •County Commuter Pool ✓' ')C� :. _ 1 Seattle - King `; �1 i�ca1 Government King County Department of Public Works, Surface Water Management Division' _ _. King County Building and Land Development Division SEPA Information ale I/r Parks, ' King CountyPlanning, and Resources Department; Attn: Erik Stockd � King County Soil and Water Conservation District I y '' iv r" ` e-,L City of Renton . Mayor; Attn: Mayor's Assistant X - ) E7..._ -- City Council �� ) Y --1-7 ,y y--k_ 1 VDU-el() / ,I -,,, Hearing Examiner's Office, 3,6 - - ' ` Planning Commission Parks Board L5 ) - , .. ; Public Works Department�1.LO,n n I :,... . ,.:..,,:,,,.:,...1..,;„,....::::.,, : '...; Parks and Recreation Department X _z. "_.. __;' Police Department Fire Department City Attorney X " SEPA Information_Center -Planning-and-Community Devellopment..Department ifi Utilities/Services r= .,.. • Puget Sound Power and Light Company ✓ i Washington Natural Gas Company X - . _ . _ _:P Pacific Northwest Bell I _ ifit. _,,..2_,L.: 2.1.4. ,A r Libraries/School Districts ' Renton Public Library - Main Branch (3) ` "-' _ '` Renton Public Library - Highlands Branch (2) )( / - 3 -45 University of Washington Library, College of Arch. and Urban Planning V >( IT A: - King County Public Library System l/ )( - - _. . Renton School District No. 403 ` .6 - 1� Newspapers _ _: Seattle Times - Eastside Edition'✓)(' . _-._ -: y= , 1$ Seattle Post-Intellegencer ✓ X . _. - _a=:, `�_` ': Daily Journal of Commerce k -� = ` r Valley Daily News X , n v : a : t; : Journal American i > Private Organizations and Others Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce ✓ City of Kent ✓ J. ; 1 Muckleshoot Tribe/ X Duwamish Tribe X I City of Tukwila i R\CA V X` \'C� X 1.1 R - ' Seattle Audubon Societyil.. x; Nature Conservancy VI(o o l S 940 Sea e-, 98 l 6l 02y -9 (lox. s Friends of the Earth / ISierra Club x .7` l tl i f 1 „ , I 11 II _ it vi . ' li kt'. • • y I. l� • II LIST OF COMMENTERS it r= - 11 II BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK ;! ' _ u'izyw. ' Yy TRACTS A AND B OFFICE BUILDINGS - - ;t' ' . File Number Commenter Date ;., .' Federal Agencies I, ' s Irr1 U. S. Department of Interior ( :, Fish & Wildlife Service it j NancyGloman May 29, 1990 ,' ri 1. L ' Irt State Agencies 1 '�f , r, 2 Washington Dept. of Ecology l Donald J. Bales May 25, 1990 3 Washington Dept. of Ecology ./ Terra Prodan May 31, 1990 4 Washington Dept. of Wildlife - Theodore A. Muller °.. _ May 16, 1990 , ` 5 Washington Dept. of i. t;{ ', Transportation ::. ...'. . ' .: May 15, 1990 6 Washington Dept. of Ecology May 3, 1990 `! City/County/Regional Agencies -. - "" `' ' . LI , • 7 City of Tukwila / .), - L Rick Beeler May 24, 1990 8 King County Office.of Open Space ; David Tiemann May 25, 1990 ' 9 .-. - PSAPCA, Anita J. Frankel April 24, 1990 , 10 >:' METRO, Environmental Compliance . , Division,.Gregory M. Bush May 18,^1990 Interest Groups _ .- ( , 11` .' 1 ,Citizens for Renton Wildlands -; -- _ -- 1 Preservation,;Susan Krom May 25,-1990 1 ,, 12 1pn, Royce A. Berg April 27, 1990 13 - 1pn, Royce A. Berg May 21, 1990 . 4;f 1 1 r File Number • Commenter Date •. il 14 Seattle Audubon Society,/ Gerry Adams May 25, 1990 15 Seattle Audubon Society/ Ltliv, Citizens for Wildland Preservation Robert G. Sieh and Susan Krom May 25, 1990 16 Citizens for Renton Wildlands , Preservation, Susan Krom May 9, 1990 • Private Citizens ' 17 Susan McNally May 23, 1990 18 Senator Michael E. Patrick April 24, 1990 _ lit. . 19 Jean Spencer May 31, 1990 20 Mary M. Anderson 21 April 26, 1990 Lawrence Forrester No Date 22 Betty Lambert April 30, 1990 23 J. A. Matter April 29, 1990 24 Mr. and Mrs. T. W. Hauff April 28, 1990 r ' 25 Joyce H. Frank 26 Ja April 30, 1990 idmes H. Culler April 29, 1990 '( i • 27 William N. Christie April 30, 1990 28 3/Peter M. Hudelson April 30, 1990 29 John and Julie McCone May 30, 1990 ' . 9 ✓ A. Elizabeth Storm May 6, 1990 31 VSusan Smalley May7, 1990 32 /Elizabeth Lundstro K ; m 33 May 5, 1990 .''� Ken and Ada Shannon May 7, 1990 34 /Mr. and Mrs. Orville Radel May 5, 1990 35 /Lois Nordquist May7 1990 ` ``' 36 J harles R. Dowd , 37 May 6, 1990 ary A. and G. James Kenney May 1, 1990 38 Shirley J. Winton May 3, 1990 39 Deborah Dowd May 3, 1990 40 Elizabeth Culbert May 1, 1990 ' 41 Christopher R. Schultz May 28, 1990 42 Thomas C. Reiter May 4, 1990 I 43 /Phyllis L. Vigal 7 May 4, 19907; 44 Elizabeth . Seafoos May 4, 1990 45 Paul and Sh n (illegible) May 2, 1990 46 ✓Walter A. Kuc ej May 7 1990 47 Mike Shanno y May 9,, 1990 t i I File Number Commenter Date 48 v Mary Jo and Oliver C. Rouse May 9, 1990 49 C. Scott May 7, 1990 50 Andrea S. Cohen May 23, 1990 51 Eve Gadbois May 9, 1990 52 Theresa McLean May 9, 1990 53 ,/,Susan Konichi May 9, 1990 54 ,/Rayna Holtz May 9, 1990 55 JJay Nelsen May 8, 1990 56 'Beulah Hillstrom May 10, 1990 57 / mma Amiad May 8, 1990 58 John P. Kelsall April 24, 1990 59 � Range D. Bayer May 18, 1990 60 Rhonda E. Chapman May 11, 1990 61 Doris McGougan May 10, 1990 62 Allegra Berrian May 11, 1990 63 Mark McLann No date 64 jAaron Heide No date 65 JTom and Peggy Bishop May 9, 1990 } '{ 66 Terry L. Lingbloom May 10, 1990 67 Gladys M. Krohn May 11, 1990 v 68 ohn Kohlsaat May 9, 1990 69 J ark and Jean Ouellette May 21, 1990 - 70 Lori Levin Cvoo ki.v.A... k3„,rh,\ I riu. No date 71 Julie P. Bonwell May 21, 1990 • 72 Jl Marcy Beyer May 11, 1990 73 !'William Bolanos No date ; : 74 �I Virginia and James Wood May 6, 1990 75 •'Jane Lindeman May 8, 1990 76 'Janice Martin May 12, 1990 ; 77 J P. Dee Boersma April 25, 1990 78 v/Elizabeth J. Miles May 19, 1990 79 �/John M. Wolf May 15, 1990 80 y/Beth L. Healy May 21, 1990 81 I Ralph M. Evans May 18, 1990 82 J Krista Rave No Date ; 83 ,---;----, /Walter T. Trial, Jr. May 23, 1990 84 \ Donald Norman May 9, 1990 1 . 85 J,Christine Linden May 25, 1990 86 .J Marty Murphy May 14, 1990 87 ji Paul Julin May 21, 1990 88 J Amy J. O. Forrester May 28, 1990 i u • File Number Commenter Date 89 ' John Peard May 24 90 /Susan Margolis , May 25,91 ary M. Anderson 3, r May 2 : I 92 Christopher Marilyn P. Cliffordte I 93 No date'.` 93 arilyn McGill No date, Lori Levin 95 iKeith Peterson No date. May 10, 96 V/Jean Sundborg 97 J,Sheryl and Phil Lundahl May 2 98 i// No date William N. Christie 99 Unknown9,April 30, 100 ,Margaret R. GourleyMay 1 101 N/ May 18, Peggy Dunlap, Tom Makey✓ thia Mack May 24, 103 a Newsome May May 24; 104 Jim Bernthal 105 Andrew Carp May 23, 106 enter No date �L Scott Forbes No date 107 ✓ Susan Krom 108 Keith Peterson April 2(1 May 18 Form Letters 109 � y Moilanen 110 W. "Stan" Murphy May 23 May 23 111 Theresa M. Howard 112 Sherwood B. Martin May 23, 113 V Luanna T. Martin May 23; May 23 114 F. Karboly 115 ✓Lloyd G. Edwards May 23; Ma116 VSandi and Dave Sager May 117 ✓Shellie M. Bennett y 118 V Rowland J. Martin May ; May 119 Mike Setzer, Jay (illegible) 120and (illegible) Brunk May 23, 121 /Sally L Martin May 4 ✓ r. and Mrs. Glenn Boyes May x 122 en and Denise Bronger May A. 123 Carroll H. Nevermann May ' 125124 ✓Tent Grefthen May �Tatina Grefthen May 1 A File Number Commenter Date t '''' Dolt'7. May 23, 1990 126 ✓Evelyn R. (illegible) May 23, 1990 127 ✓,8haron Elliott May 23, 1990 128 Rachel A. Young May 23, 1990 129 ary Ballestrasse May 23, 1990 130 W Mary Pergamo May23, 1990 131 arol Lyn O'Neal bby Joe (illegible) May 23, 1990 132 May 23, 1990 133 �hn W. (illegible) May23, 1990 134 ary J. Graves May 23, 1990 135 /Thomas E. Stoeser May 23, 1990 136 %/ an Claudon May 23, 1990 -11 137 Juliana R. Stoeser May 23, 1990 138 tephanie Shein May 23, 1990 139 Vivian G. Cook May23, 1990 140 J J ennifer Boyes ' tin Cook MacKay May 23, 1990 141 � May 23, 1990 142 �'W uliam T. Cook May 23, 1990 143 L. Perry May 23, 1990 iiir 144 145 Xs. Kay Donald Ma 23, 1990 146 yle Perry, Jr.-- y ,�dward J. Gion May 23, 1990 147 May 23, 1990 aul D. Shafer May 23, 1990 148 avid Halwell May 23, 1990 /Daniel Pohto 1990 149 May 23, 150 ✓Laverne E. Graves May 23, 1990 151 ✓Barb Holt 152 ✓Alice, Harold, Donald, and May 1990 a Kathryn Deasy May 23, 1990 153 � Phil Polizatto May1, 1990 154 Susan Krom (Public Comments) I , 1 t******************x**********r*i •*+ >**>***>*t.******x*********<*****x --******x* ,Tt. NOuI 1 r FILE RUN'JJ31 IN LI ,RARY aCD2PT ON VaLUME GE0111 10': 55 : 15 .4M i'I.iRCH 1 . 19S' ' 151 LINES 1 C IPY J v ,,con " "A (A T I.I O O V C T A T T n A I lac) PRINT CLASS H °O°MA 0 _ PRINTER 15 ************>****>*****t****x*** ••******>****************x*********** ••********* *******'************r******x**r** *x******************************x** -********* Dan Allen 1455 S Puget Or, F304 Renton, W4 93055 • Mary tok.' Anderson j Rooert Anderson Shelly Anderson 13613 Sc 18.0th I 13511 M. L. King Way S. P308E 2575 Simms St Renton, t•,A 93055 I Seattle, WA 93178 Lakewood. CO 80215 Mr. 6 firs. Bangerter David Beedon Renate 5eeclon 16420 - 111th Ave SE 1725 Pierce Ave SE 1725 Pierce Ave SE Renton. WA c8.'55 Renton. WA 98056 Renton, WA 9805E Royce 3 rg Jim Bernthal • Diane °lonskt LPN Arc;hite: ts 3023 NW c4th 13511 Empire way S. #401E 1127 Pine St, Suite 30D Seattle. WA 95107 Seattle. W4 98178 Seattle. WA 43101 • Dee 3oersma I Bill Eolanos 3111 S King 3636 Evanston Ave N. A15 Seattle, WA 98144 Seattle, 'WA 98103 • Paul :eras:; Kalman Braunar Mr. David Bricklin 2500 - 31st Ave SE. -34 2603 Queen Anne Ave N ! Bricklin a Gindler Mercer Island, WA 98040 Seattle, WA 98109 1424 Fourth Ave. Suite 1015 Seattle, WA 98101 Burlington Northern, Inc . Chris Clifford 206 Central Bldg 2721 Talbot Rd S 810 3rd Ave Renton, W4 03055 Seattle( WA 93104 °atrick Conn Container Corp of America Mr. 'Gary DuVall 14720 NE 1st °1. dG'- I PO Box 47P 204C 6oyer Ave Bellevue. WA . 8 ,07 I Penton( WA 96057 • Seattle. WA 98112 Sharon 'Elliott • Barbara Fevilie 13503 M. L. King way 5. .,s01 • 14300 SE 176th, CN5 Seattle. WA 98178 Renton, wA 93058 Dr. Scott Forbes Amy Forrester Jeff Goltz No. 315 - 11675 seventh Ave 4702 Davis Ave 5. #25-101 Lane Powell Moss E Miller Richmond, B.C. Renton, WA 98056 711 Capitol Way V4M 2W'? CANADA Olympia. WA 98501 • • • L . E . Graves M. J. Graves 905 N 28th P1 905 N 28th P1 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 • Robert M. .Hastedt WILL TAM J. HECKER 13513 M. L. King 'Way 5. oF2U4 23415 SE 264 Seattle, WA 93178 Maple Valley. WA 98038 Gene Munn Lauri Johnsen 1816 N 57th PO Box 161 Seattle. WA 98103 Renton. WA 98057 • Dr. John P. K_lsell 22 Deerfield Delta( B.C . V4M 2W9 CANADA • • 1110 Jean Suncr>>era Curthy lord 121 SW 171 st St 11 aZ1 - 1 40tr, S'c • Seattle, wA 9316b Renton. wA 9F.056 • • • 1 � Marilyn Weindorff • 16482 - 109th Ave S Renton, WA 98055 . John Wolf 18434 - 42nd Ave S Seattle, WA 981 a8 • . 1 • • • • 1 r r • 1 r ! • a:r r • • • • • 3 , ♦l S P [T.Y .OF RENTON partment of Planning/Building/Public Works 1 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington. 98055 Ralph Evans 33 s, NE 11 th p1 Renton , NiA 9J56 • DITY OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works WO Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 Kathy Wilkins 4258 - 37th Ave W Saattler WA 98199 CITY OF RENTON Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 • H . H. gumtle:T l S 12527 - 35 9E168 Seattle / WA st \ ITY ' OF RENTON :partment of Planning/Building/Public Works 0 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 • nri ittc Hoopes PO 3cx 672 Kent, WA 98035 JITY OF RENTON )epartment of Planning/Building/Public Works 00 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 Janet Heineck 12035 - 32nd Ave NE, #402 Seattle, WA 98125 ../.."._....„ I.. • ...:D •• • ,,,,:,.,, abr_,a o,&_ 7 / i . 35/.,. --•- /71 / 7- — i g 0 , • ?a/9_ • .. 2' 1VaA,k)Wg((bfuir ,i . . .• , . .:.,, •:....) I• - . \S-d---Z, ,' ,. . L." , Vadvh-rix a 98o70 • i . _,! .•_,, o _-.- H • ...,, i---z)-)/( i ()/1-- 7goc=a5 11 ). (.._:•: "._,tv-vt "iti . .q805(0 . H , ‘.. , ) • , I . .. _... ii • .__ ,s 1 ,y__,. _ i 0.. 0.-,kuxe__ co‘r\ e_rucurvr7.A__6- /025 73 ,3W C- iiii`t /Cot • (0 , WA • oilol q8076, Se3A4se-' ....., Nil- , (-.-, .:...:.. -rytunas 6-r6DL r1-6"List ,.. ., • —Rex-Am , WA ?8 055 . , „.,.,} 1 . - -' - • - _ _ ___ 1 lqj 7;pga,„(4-1,0-yL. .1 / ..zo.31- 40-e. S. -6: - li r , • t-- l :-/-0)-1 o# 1 .q 8058 ...., . , c..1 , CO? actcabis h • ) ..... 021z(a4, a2q91--- at)r. so_ , . • geaAli(e ‘--... ) wig • 98/q8 - • I . • , .., . .- • . . , , . •,, , . , . . QID.°1 'IL . ,--• 5eArA"\-\'€*-) W Pt ' 2)1D3 :,..) . , _ .. • " . : •• UAl/;,e--tia '//g67^' I ,•-.) • ...• • , .. , -." 96, d/4 98/78 , , • ..._ . . i 8/5 ,g• , .27./i- . '. , . ._„. - ,1 . 1 . . ' . •'•1:' a/4 /7 ic.5/ A-c-. i . . • /0,23 ,/ 1/1a&e. i,,_._- ,Vie(A2 a4.,57w. .; . . , ...., . !I ., . . . ...... , . . . • . : • . . . . 1•,. , , , , . - --:,--.,,-----,,,nr: :7' ;:—.; ' :' :— 7--: ':.:' ..:.:-.'''.17,-' li• —.. —;•:';''s7'...:i..:7;1: -.7:':2:77 77:^P.:17357•jt:. : .:'' ' • -•: : ' '• ' ' '' .T7 w; • f. • : : : !' '.. ' " '• .. ': ''..2.'';`.,,t-i:'t :;:': :' - :: :f''...::. :) ,::: :y;...,', `,.4.',.... ',.. . ' . 0,.-..:' ,: ... . ,, .L :.:,.:::.!..'Se;" ::::: . ;!, ' ' ..,:. : .: ;., , :.: , ., ..,.. ... '?":.!Av.;:- .,',. ...:•:::.;,,.;';',,:::: :'.-.. ,c;"''',',7,;:;,::.:..,::::',.t.!...).:',14 ;; . ''',::'0',:-; '''.i :'-. ' ','. . ' : .. '• :": • .::: .::,.71.1';''', )!'-'. ''',:',-; .''':;.;,'":/,-..t,'.',':,-,;:4-;,;.::.!: .';'::::eii;i''','",..:' ..,: ',::'' :. .:: .:. ":,:, ;,; ::-.'!: ' : '.... ,'!...;. ' - .,•:.,:,.., ....'.:::.,;.:•:,„..: .,:.:.:.,'4, , •,.,4,,:, ..;......: ;.-'.,z ..,•: :.•.:. . ••,,,:, ..%-`.:: : , :. •V'', , ;.' •, •. '. ,:..i.. :••,,Aii:.:• .. ' ,' •:. !•: ,•.: .,,.,.,..,, :",, ... ‘....,....:‘,.:$1:.:, ' .•„.. '',.,, ...i'...:K. , , ':.... .-.....,;,.), . ,, ,,,:v.z..:•.-,? ,,.'..,: .-•:.., •,..• ,,:-...: ...,..,::...,...,.. :..:: ,..,4,..,....:•..,: :, : •, : :•',.••! ,' ..::..i:'4.:'::•...- .:''• ,; .:'.;,..:•:::::::":,...::!:•.:..,':',Y.... ',;-.4'..,.. .', .,,..::',...•!...' '. " ?.,‘ , !:.....:,... .,••::.:: .....,:?:y. ' , , ..;-;.,:1!;:::...: .. ‘: . :.; :..,%., • '.:..,.: • ..-. ::.,..:.,:.*, ....:. . ...,....;0,, .....;;'.::.,',.-., a.,:;,-;:.!? ..':;,;-, ,,,:..••:..,,,„'.,. ::.:::.,...,,!::::,,,,,::;..„:,,. :.:..!:,h.;c:i.; , ..,..,. 4 .',.•;,: • , ...';:. .:.' ..:, •. .. .,‘,. .;. , ;:,,, ,.i.7.: ',':,, ,,t--.6,;.-1..;. .i..--. .:.:.,.....'..,,%:." ,::',... .:::::',.•f: .:. . .• '1;.if :: '...:::.• . ,• ••.:: .4...!: : , ..: :: •:,.,..-. ".: . , ..,:. !. .,. , ..:-....„,&:,. . ,i,' .:'.',;,...,..,: ',:,.:. ....:,:n..!•,...:; ',,.::::....!;m . . • ,: . .: •., , : : ...-..:. ...:, . 2,;. , .:., -', '.y.. . J - (7). ,t:, - • .. tl\---- a__. • , '':' „.4., — C—‘' ) -- - C° 1 • ' ' '--;':- ----:s'",7---- ,.::— 0-- 4is z.-. i' -) cj • t- ' t 4-. .z - b ..,..„, 0 --, ----4, , . rst) --•‘—rs — • ------- - co 0 -41 Q v3 L6 00 Q, bQ 'C'-- tii Q sk03, sc2 \ S - ' t.C) _d -• ._ A • Q , IN-1 Th_ 8z/g6 em . 12/P' s --7si?_'s ‘ _r oi •)(7'W.- EQ5'0/ 71 a.,(/3 -1.4.c? v p vst c),:-.30C36; . ,. - - -CF '• n, H .. 7Yd:91 yvar-r\ucx,3 c-c: I.1-1)(2 • . gg0S6 -)gvgb mr), LA 0r4 , •1 . .:..-. : :.. -. • 1 OC7C id -2.)-10 0 64 gQ . .: . ; - .... u '' 3 --75--)-0D/4f, • . OW,g6 ii(4 1/-/-fl ‘: • • (24-4z://cy rqd _. . . . a / o </0-W •-- 2-0 CgOgb bi 0/ / • • • • -2.-rvz°5 ''•11; 0/ - iga re' S' )(1V -WY/a(71 ig()7 Zi OA- . . ---r-----dvia,, 7-) ---7_77-- /6 9 - w.,c7 ?-yr\ • . . l'gvi • ---7-)* q/v9/( - ' �Z �S ZZ I � 1 �'� `'i�'- 31•4 -, vo"up I Log 1 • °)S o g' Wil �.,.s,rk LI 1 gG 4d01 ' a)\+ , c.t7 •N Ca lQ1 MN. an ,-L So L Lwo 11, ooD Uro 1 h IA a 8g)94 `C2-'I1ro11 -) w ;3g6 ' \--u 9& I —1i-,p i Zob Et ,p.qoa v,2As6uvi ifis 606 I 101 g.b V0'1 'a\44 S .. • -}-S SIZ 1 •a's 8Z og 01 v9 -? kco .,l,- aspw Sc. .2 1 `�S0s‘ -1 rn ' v4u.\vra S'IvL� �bl(� o Id {-g Z 'oink o i s Ssakj Sk`^" `' sSQgg V 's ' kAnk'kja v QLQ96 ri\ w / I b40 •S d - s 2 0, c)Lc3 od .n CN 57m)) •(n v►vvo c ?'°1 -12 V`•u.A.� cs+o436 .1 ' "Lo3ru , QLQ86 .1,4h'1 'LLcron ' 1-A% 8Z LE h .LI7 - zag -6Z bt Avoie'(3 U‘ 2,,,W ca , 5 UAL\aii Ne Tv p SS 086 . 'rl 'u.°44 Q086 -\74M ` Uov`SloA d%og6 'v1.o-v►'a -4� QLQ%6 dfY1' u09sbn loh v0Z *“ ,tb mS Qii.v)v} arts acn -bob LI vi-kidAnw '-A-' >uo u-oSils Ssvg vci 'w}vra °Is QR6 VM ' ail, MS suraIv -17 Z V -'h-Y srvgwra lZ8 l...raUb)10k -a-T1108 Cllp 3 or rbrow 8 So 86 Vl'1 ' L i %- vcA` a`�-k.-' S •as ,1-4.L.Z it - SoGnl Iz •1) ld \7\:4-1:e b SE awtocraV'1 -'`V ' (Na 1 JaN •-V - _\-c rr\ S 9Qg6 V01 ' vat �2 vrn ` Imo., • S 2h14 tiles c)ab -YFF. cnS .n-W Ni7.91 1-bSI E - -rtm -vA`1-I' A(21D/ soo3.-v s •W ‘-i+ Z 113 dP)1g6 t(r1 I '1 WcvaS 01s Ty 41)1 - bE 6)SI �oQ6 v -A . ssog6 vol ' L49.0,8 ' &ogb vm 'r^11o11 ' -uln( S'Vr-o'N °°eb 3.S •JQ ') J pl!t''1 a)V13-1 L 1 zSz \41)1 1 \ 3 1 '4Caw5 4X o \ D qe-z113 1 S17.06. OD ` poocravrl 30086 yM 'a`'v`alP8 -1-- A-5sww'% S LZ cosi_ wSra •W -vVJ us'4A►cn •0 ).aNs L L1S6 ',dfi'10��S S UE 86 a 'dn1����-}- C'�J MINI ld po°cZo N 1 I C'rn . Q to 10 01 bL ' ob O1 t,1-0 ns u c�w►rvc .. 39voow �bl 86 sakmow sz,ra 94.02.b b`f-v1 'TkAv19 ..rn PI/Y 'S any tg01 I F i z-z cfrfro, `ll , , ra° Uo --1-�� 00Z E Sal 11n1 •0 �-ka \c z.11ag ,oC1 �,� 3. ,oQ •6 Met-f, 136 V roa . S6,��s�% 1•'p74. ,' ,�uo BLI% 'a- '�S -ua'n 'Z ten' Svc c.avvi "-o a-A°, �vwsx-og . •dk �s�'nbpao s'(, Ec) 2g V.01 'a1-4i'ea' 8LI g b W►'1 'a\t1-vraS 'DAV 7+cc v 4z1 '14 °S and/ 431 L Soot I ,\J UI�J(row '»Ivrnl 1-'rea1 " Iph-Ao 's#9,4 .13 -Aw 3.0084 .9411 ` 1-1Anwg gLig6 vin 'al.-1-es 3•S to' - 0)oo l •S'V t j2L - IZ LII %cV M?rurfl aural Ucuue s rV M u� 9L I g6 'P1 `- 1-1+-aS 8 LI 86 VD'► 'a -C tfi 9 I i l-F'1°S SZ L 4S t.T+ �}-Y L11 ,OS SoLL room s�w;vi p'..ke vikv A%n tvia45,1i)v, LA -iI-- I I gin s ''-t-1-} wesS gSoBb VO1 ' ' tU 4.5 �bld I PiucO `zIZE 1 3S HLipi 11evAs vresrs SSo$6 kiM ' "aa. Z-boSb VCA `49.* "Ami S44,4oT4 coo) ra xtrn •3•S bE0$1 u!Aal IAQ-1 FAQ Mgt%O - '0096 39`1-yl 'anhll--)$ .1E024. V01 (-4" . 4 isuZ17- 3S LSoZI *19Z •3•s S1101 -�--rr's 1 t.,1°g ul°C' -av►vr-°W a'rr,(• pue umor S5 QRC 'r/M ' ' `^ __, Z61 'S c 26 Lo186, 14(11`a1WeS . �' up 1 S r').5 S.w*°)S M1N oas - e C � Di7 i (Tenn►( - bo`fes �03 (0203 So, 2364 Pl. -14 L1 1dZ 9o'o©a k Q vzfi, l&- '8032 \rvshn Cook Mac 3 225 ga.4,0..1c,e, la.! Re.Iminv4, ISorol "Co4 l�o D. S�ct�t�r• 1O0/ 67a/;,-1- v-c . Ses�.�l-e , lvA 9 8 118 0 7'6//a 112o i�-c�,o, )4. ,78/?8 �- e-' Sao `T WOq-d-e-- A Al.r �. 4105 of r,r D Y &eat, �/ � -�- She S�=�,� Soo 2011- 980 53 67eAa`f&, w 9,8761 01Ut. sd . zooFb -hi/rn '1-72121/0-g az/ a f s, 25/ - bbe/ z om (f 72tV 9SQg t(it/ bcervvrd Csg6 • 7d ifoz e///7 *s -c'7/-e srn J' w,12 -gbe - bs'b Dv _sZ°o/ 3 lei, 'r✓'�Ud Z • -01A,64ev-- /, 7--;;; Abcol&Pce (. 0r-/ eA a/vIdA2A) S eor-ke,),) 2az /1 W. 5/ - 60 V%,27/ &830 �3 ` Ale'. 98/0 , , w 9/0 3 gga,6(;1-e- )1,0 98//5 117. `1116/Va"-ey- /ribs 4 - g/S �o u1 2/9 #3 ,25 "4 g. 98/?b7 wg 98o02 6Q/ ti 6,�& OS b bum '44 -as A/ .%I - 1 I°) StlY4PtAttAcm I •s•w •11 vurotwm Z7/(79 / 2/7-17 lep_rwydz../.?.(7)4 44,,-1...3.)--7,6,-vti,2,0 7/.1 T., J c Q A' /73 ' 09 Oe 7/ 8b/8 oes j , `)12 70086. rtj1.722024:-9Pg , 63 c-0 6igg/ o /ogb • ( (�, ,� � /0 g -`- S •/Y .){1P ����' Tim Krause Offices of Richard Ar,mbun1 505 Me olson St, Suite- :Co Beath , oA '..1 ,eAnn T . LeFond Chris Linden =iron Lumsden 1411 Grant Ave S, 2011 Evergreen °t -d 15500 S- 179th Renton, p;u 08055 Bellevue, OA 05004 Renton, 'AA 98053 • Eric Magelssen en0. Martin 3640 Asnw:rth N 1520 NE 107th Seattle, 4a Y6103 Seattle, WA 05125 Rowland Mer- in J. a. Nmt:er pee NcClella.n 6 98199 256 24tn Ave W 914c 121st Sc Ref Taylor Ave NW Renton, ivA 9O056 Renton, alA 93' 5 5Seattle. r14 Susan McClellan 14001 Northwest Pi i.:'n Seattle. WA 9c'l5•. Mark Miller Joe Millb 1st C ty Cc e opmen 'Grp 22431 - 10th S EOC' 5 h Ave S to 1 Des Moines, WA 98198 Se ftyie, "A 981 4 Marty Murpny Lois Ncrcouist Mr. 'Jon Norman PC Box 3070 13503 Empire Way 5, =301A University of Pennsyvania. Half Moon Bay, C4 94O1 ° Seattle, wA 98175 Dept of Biology Leidy Labs Philadelphia, PA 19104-6013 Jr. Gordon Miens Mark Ouellette institute cf Env. Studies 3912-1 /2 NE 105th University of 'Washington Seattle, WE 9E125 Mail Stop =m-1 2 Seattle, .VA 93195 Mr. Jonn Peard • 1704 _ Fifth Olympia, WA 93501 Alicia Sazme Ruth Schaefer 1455 S Puget Or, =F304 PO Sox 12862 Renton, WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98111 LaVinde Schefi.;lct Bonnie Scott 11621 - 140tn Se 2312 NE 9th P1 Renton, WA 930 o Renton, WA 9.8056 City of Seetti:- City of Seattle 321 2nc' Aver City Comptroller Seattle, WE c.1 J. 600 4th, Rm 101 Seattle, WA 95104 V muse Smi:n 23211 - 125tr S Kent, Wd 9r'.031 \GA cam' 12)0k- Irei/rA te&b 75/& rne/ (57�Q w 98/22 w w Il II 1 __Maxi Nit_e,r. x_ - 1 ___lea,--keA- -- vIc ..,._ 4 .vti .- , E n �C ag III 1, �� � Co ii __ 1f k : �0 _� 6 �.._-6.ue-e_ x I LLs t---)L0-_- 4._ L--(.0 ?",.5.1 x, III s()_ff 0 ff atc_0:.0. rn 146...il V\t-14-_al, „)._. ,a,C` ,caL AA__iri- 11 1--- -. lel- Of rkSLe-r\re- . )(,..' °- . ►l 1/ n .(-- _,,L t,\--kv (,,r-vv, , 1 M `Tf J G nO i Y , f'I.a-r-K.)-.1-- I -/V)cu-k c6o to \,e_“e,,r- li Pick-y- , r(k-ik.A 1111 li ii 11 JO kr\ -1-V-4/\-CLVIC-L.%6V\ li _ l&A(eti ik_c_k jAIA- ')caol-, . Ma,h e_., Itof.hrvouA .se__0. 5E3 I cam__._. II it II 1 1, li li II 11 +i ' 1! II il II 11 l i, _ __ -_ 11 I I li CIS f t- r Sear* pcs*„_4_4(p5 exi-eL Jo ^D a 4. G,a _tom. 4f - I Ij fl it 14- 11 Ij it II { i i ji I.f li ji fi if 1j f( ij ij ij j iI If ff ff fj it if 1j . . • . . . - • ,, .,.. ;;;4',1 . • :,......-b..-4..,•', •-.'',.'..4.-::: ..- -: . •; ' . . , •• • ,,,,,,,--n,,rc:',•'.4;;',4,..,:',";.4'.; .: ;',..-, ;''-•••••••• ;••1%; .1.•,,:.'•- ..•,,.„.,,; .,..,, , , ., .,..,i'.-.,.....,.,„,,a,..•,,,„.'„',",, '.k,-'1:3..„';;:',:•`,:,".:I.;''';',;'";•„`,:'.I. a:•,1„.•-i',"'t ;;;;.`•,,,,.1, •,,.,•;,.• •a '. ; '' ,•i 1!...:,..".I:V,,,;;;,1„:;,,;",,,;:3'1)1,,,';':i:1,1,4,-;;`,'t,,!".;"!,..:,,,,-;,`",;::.;!::,..,;.1,1:::•:,•,:4,;:ii'll,.1i;,,i,lia;',1:1",:i;i;i,.1 ;t..,.•'• ;:••••:!;;; ;';••;:`I.`.;,:,,•,', ;',-;:'", :f...:; :;:-....•'',2,r,•:,, ...,...,,,,,,);.".`,.1,,,;,"',,,:;',,;..,,,.!.."• „f:,',-,' ., ;,..,,,,: ,• . , :. •a,:.• •I: :•-: : '• — .., • '";, 1,;`,;;" 'y;•••''L Lii, f:',',..,:•;,1.?,;:.1..,11,4.4;*.`,.).., •,„,, ;,,,4:,;,••(,.1.,.,... ;1,,,,4,•,.,-'2,-...,,44:;i;:-...,:i.f2,i;....;;,;•-,-.-,0,-,1.;;,-•.•,.2-..„--',.'•:-,:,i....•.-,•-,,...:),•,,,P.,..',-',',"-,--'_;:..,•—•nr ' ‘-.'.': n n • • -n .,• . ,-•.-. .,.i-•;.,.-,.',-•. ,.,„ , ,.,: . , - ,!.-,,,.,7 ii 1,;„ 41.4i:''."4,'Z 4:'.7..''. .;;,.', ;,.1 ''4',.-...''. '.'''.,''.il,i':•'•':::', ,`,"."';',1;'.',:'e.le, . ;21';•,... i,,l'•••• ;'''':.{:.W re,p,:, 'i--;';,•'$•2—:',';'',-,•:•‘1,,•'ie'',1;;e1•‘•.X0,1/4•,le,4'•••..,.',;;;''''.;"';'',:';'•'•i,-,'.;'.:,-;'•, .0'',,''''.0'...;.I .,',.,1!...';',,,,q;'"••ed f`,,S. , , , ,.•: , ,.. . .. ; ,, . . .,.. . . . . .„ ... . ,......„,,,..,, .... , 44:77,.'; '....•;.1‘i",;.•;m7..h.'ZV.41;..'-••,;,:•41,-,:a;;,7:ra;`'''if•''':It..i;-•:.!`,:i;I.',A!..,,-;:21..."••,1,!'^:' s...;:'3,`,",-.;,',.'",:a'n1, •f:•':-f ' ''*-,•• ;' ;'''',. .J'•`• '',. .44.,?.1::',.',,rj.,,71''',"‘•,-,,g,:e.„1:.•,,,,,,ii,.,:.'-A.,',..•-•.-•....,a:•,:::,•,-',,IM'E;::4.... .',.-; , ., :(.7",•••..,,;..,.1.i/;'..•,,,,•',- ; ,-.;;„ ,.,;••••., .,4.12..,,, ..it,a?,„,v4 41.'4.'-ef:a„.1;`!"'"atola;••';::,,.•,,,..•".:;:i'',.•;-'..,'.';-.I.;,,,,-,;:ii••••••!'',;;;;,:;,', •.•a', „,..!.!;•,:::.:`,;:;•;',-,;;`,:•'-';::,',,.I.`;:' ;'., ' '" • . •,'•:.1,:.Isaa,.•;,,,,:,; ;;,,,,,,,a,,,',:,,:,......,,,,,:',-,•::-,:,,- ',.„7,-,?,,,,-;r4,,,,,;..,!,:‘,t.,,,,,°:.2,1a:P`;•::'.•'!i,i',I:,;,,,,,'','•,,,','',I. ,,,...,..,:::'•,a.:;,!,--1;,....,;.1.,:,:',,a,::.,1,',•....'.'•••; ;',," :: .,• ,.,•,4,,,,,:.::---,,,,;;;;,=',...,,.,-,-.",::;,,,,,,:,;;;...•.•.•;:-irl,;„.:',0„;„,,•!.•. ,,A,.:,',i.,•••_•••,i^,;•',"",,;,;--l•;I:,,.*,.,; ••••',,l'„ ,.•,,,,,,,...,`,,i,;',••••. •,.„.,,•,,',,•' „, i • ' k•r" ;fi'''''''''Ill''''..,:'!'.'''''',,,:;5'''••-:1 i'%14't•i.'":•';i;';'1 ',..;'•;:;''''',.' , •.•;••• .••• •,, '',••',..'/1'.:1:• ;'5:4:;•''•;.;;I''''••' '•'', 4. 1 "•';',°'',,..:••,'!,t.,L.t.,1-.:k;';''''''':'1';''*11.'-•.;;4'41r "1: ''''',,.•'..: • ••'• •,'' ' ''',r';• '•:.•;',2';':'•'''i'•:r..:;''''';',•""••:;•k,:'.:!••••;'''..,1:;:': .•'.'f;',;•••; '''...,, ' 'i' ':',. ;''.',.'e: •,,!'e.',''.•:'; ,'.'',..'':., '••''. '' '';'y- S.'';";;',e1; ''I''' ''•'; '',.:-.'', .:;:ii,1•2:',.:'•:-..-':.;.!.;;`:'•;':•ni'i.::••-'.yt....;•,' 1"',‘,,',?,.i;•••; •,::*•,',"•:; •1•.-.,'"1:!,,..'•.:',.-;!••„,..„'„•••,.....J:4;,!:,,•;,;:-•,?,,;.:,' ,t,•::•1,,.''';,'•2-.,,••,•!-:•,..:1;,,,;;'r,',.,,.•:-:. .: . -:'• ,•,• ,-.., •,:,..,... ..,...17.:,,, ••, •, '. ,,,....:,. : ,,•i.„•;•,,f,,',.•:,,„• .•, I, . ,;.. ,,,, , • ; •,,,,,,•!,,,r,,,,. t.• . '':.•;,'';'•,'" '‘'M 'i',,'''•:••'',',7,2r(''',••'!" 1-'''•::,"••',••0411•;`''‘+';- '•';'-'•`,1•`:ir'•.,''•''''-,1,r;:..4:.•'..'•,:•,: ,;•••••:.:i -,.,.-::0,•,',„,,.:.i.,c.i.ii,..4.-;::,,fly'i,,,..,,,, ,:-,•!‘,,.;‘,,,.,,i.,,',,,-*,,,;. ,, ,L,.. ! ,,..;,...,-,..,.)':,•:..,...-,-:E.,:,i1,'.,i.-.:.,., ,...,1 ,- , , ,.,:,- - - -.. -,,-,;-..;,,J.,-,,,,e,:i4:••";"z-.;i4.4!:,:•:4•4 „ri,:.•.;.10'.4r.,:.4.-;1,1.!,‘1,,,:t•V.,:,.,:',4:'Yi.:-"i",'",••• •••."'•:;•"r:.':•••:•r"".:1•...i4'''.i'',:•1:-.•.‘1:V...::',:•"41."::1:':;;;:•:k."13•:•••?:). :•:•:.4.:::-::•;;'," `,(•.:.":''.'•-•:1,:••.••• i' .••:::'.::'.•' i: :::,:• :..,'•';' :...•:,•.jj::'„,.: ',.'.:.4•`"'`,,;• r;•';'•;i:••,•..,''ir;'4.:',,:,-,:;',,,•:,:'j,'• •.'i'',..,'T,„;.(;,4,j?•'"ii:',• ,f;i.,.;,':,•1.;•'i.514••.:iteJr;',;.., 't,.4..et;•','30',,,i.,;.'i'41',i,.'•V'f.it,D...r•.f•I'''i',.'il-.':';',:'1.'",''':f;'‘;••A'4079_,V7X..,..?..:4"%;;•;-•;•••••: •••". ..:::.•••,••;- •(..."• • I , • ••'":• ':.••-••i:..". :•:‘•...' i::1':•':•:':4•:.1::•'':•::•:•'f:'.::f-:.:•:'-•:I'''•:::•"'t:'": :•:•••• ...,.;•114:0:1‘;,.4t.2i;-''':'...":.•"-•.",i'.•:).14.i'fr.4:114.'"4..';;.4-14t,..'.44?.?4Vq.1:11:.'=•:?•..;••!;':..7::•.••,:, ,1'.• .•.••:,:"" il:4147:04 4 ill'...•.4.;,:,.:4...",-;•.;! ' .. •;:•• • :, : ',... '':••.• •• - '' •'•• '' .•;•• •••,'" •• ..;•.•. '.•;:ti..r.,;:';`,••.',"•' •.., „ ..- , • ')4..1,',•••••••...-.1i'..:ij.'.V.0 . -:'.,IrAP:rt.:;•:171ii4'-:'::40'ir':'•7:':r.'"' ):'''''::(•;':::.;.1••?•' ••11':,• •' 12:1•.;:ii`,1:•t:4"1:•.'44:::::,:.4'.•.;-•::•.'::!,,:..', :• :-.: • . ;:-• .:' :i• ' :' :•:•l':.-.:•• ; •:.•.'.','. ::::''•: •:•,' .•:-";:.' •!. •'.'.•44:"...':.•.",? .:::•••:: 1..... • '.!:...1.:,':•::.1.':jf1::•.11:1:1•;::•;;E:'''q,',,,1•1:1::..44‘:':.•!23•::•:fr.:•,.•14•5,:r. '4q,,t',1,4;1'..;,::,;1:.,••:',..:; ',":,• ••4,-.".3,1:4•,' :.:1:",::.ii•P.:•:::;;.:.;•::":••41,."t*. .';',•':.':::;:".";,;•"::.;:::. '. •:•: ••••• : :";••:.:'4i;r':",.. :•:';',r.. '.;I:;:•-•-•.''•••'...': .'•'; .:.:',,;:: '' ;:',:f:4:"...:. ir'::':.:::".'::4', ;.i::i'7;:...f.4:•':::tilti•V;1•1!:'.•;"4‘,411i.'•,,i;j.:7i..,si, ...1,T;; ''' ''' .. " '•''''''l'3';' ; L.-77p...7,.....1•;••,.7,..,,i.,*''.:.,,,x,..'''''''L.,:!:''':'',..••''.'; . • '-,. • • •' • •,'!,..•'..., .7'...•;.;;.,', ,,,,.,,,,;s-,,,,,.,.. , 7,, ,,,,,, 1::' '.-:: ' :;" '1.'''' ' il'''' •,1,-4',11,;Af,:••;:t,A,:).:•';''-'4,,''.,,: t•;.:[1,',.,..,I,,..---:'t.,,:;:•,•"7::"44::-ali,,P.,r.•'.', ., ':.•-i..., .'. •;: ;'a' ,•:! ,a,.• : -.:1';14;:I:::.` ';:'' `.. ''?••• •' ''' ;'"•4- "• ' 4. 4•;.'!,'",',"'''''•!;;:iiAl`:";!,0•Jf''.',,,i;i''.''.:;:i;A:V;I:61:,-;'`. •"ii,t•'•i'‘.''!`.4t;:"•;i1:::,,r;.,..;','2,i;• ;; I:;4:::,;;,•-'-';:::.;',-':.'';.:•r,: , ,, , :,a :,•,• ,•Pf. ""i-",„:,,:,':;''.;;;,, 7 '.: '':•` ': '•• ;:••2 ' '' , ' ,•::•",•:'•::: •: '.a.':•,?,I':,-;,•:; . ' ;.5,,•.;1,i;.,..-a-'::fs$4'.I.vt:'.,Fr),;,--;fi;';;;.,-;;;`.•;::17,:•''''',-•;-",•1'..4.::`iiii:1:" :;,:"`r,Y.:•:•0•11:•,,,:!,;',..;....,;'; : ;;; '•:,;'-",:;' . '•-'''``•': ;.:7'1',4?;i'.:°,•il•!;. •- •1••:. -.;;; •,i. '•••"' •'! • a: ,...'‘,;''•:.'",,•/''. •'"••'.:'.; ,,,,,:•4. • a':•..;;;-,i'";;-,.',",./.`;- ;.'. •:',!,- ''..;,:••44"p'••?;•:;;.4".;:•;',::•!!'.1':11:411`.•;:,c.";:1`.'`,:41;-`;',.11;14'.;;Nl'-" !••.'a !:1":;i,I;!:[ :• 4,1,,,a. .'-.' •::,:!:' ;';',"al.,.i,:.tf,•":'',',""`•.•••••,.,,•••;;. ''',,';:: ;.•-1",, „ ';',.'",•„:•••:;'''' ';:. ':;;'.',,,-; ;•::'•°•' "."'.. . ;'''.•. •' ;•;2,', ,a,a:j*',';;;;',... .'',-.r.,' . ,'''•3:i•-:'''+:1•14:5,i'.,7M'`.:,t,•:-',:.1..-1;4:11;-.Vi--..:A;-.)4i',',::''',,,,:-,.•,(:',:r',.!:.,.. .'....=il,•,•• •••,-...i..1:;..-.:,'4..:-4:.';',.'4;:;'`‘',.....,-1,',t......,,, p4:-',.?,.'.,.4';',.',.4„,,,-.,:-:-.-,i.,'-,.....'„i'' ' !,.... ... ,•1 ,. :',,...:„;.:.'. •- -.•., ;-, _ ; ,, ,,,,..„., . '.:,!:4,.•,...,!4',i,,1 ....-.,,,., .,',..4,: :.:,7,:,--;N:;!„,•q•--f,', ..';'h',.. ..',i'i:,',I,,.•'.,.;i:1,:;,,t')-,....i.,,,,,,.....,?,!•4K.. .,,,,,)i,'......40,• .i.;•. ,Y i';-!'•,...: ':±'..',1•(.2',-•'..'.',.'',.',,,iliR r.'''.'...,:'r„•• ,•: ''--4'•-;;.-. ,: ' .;• ,''.''.• ,j '.', .,',•.,;•,:'...,: ,.., -.,..; -.4,,,,.4., ,'.;;;.••',:.. •.-•-.i''n.,i'.,'.14;',:,,'41:',', '..1.., •.•.•-.:;.,'°,-(:1-=',''';- •••`,f-.•....2.''.•r•'.$,--,--•,;3•Pqy.':.'•;. ,..• •••• , 4g--,..:•-it•,'.i.;':'.=,-..!,..',-,'',:i r,,,-;;';•,3''...-:',,,,k',„:',..:,.....,•,-...;',,,-,.:.;...,, ....,:-;:,.-3,,,,,-. .; . ;,.•.,„ • 1. ..,.',:.:.,,,,,-,:c ...,., .„..f,. •-;,:1:, ..',.,, :, :.,.....,,i.;1.,1,"'''.:a.,•-',.:,,,..,„ P:•••,,7i,,,,,i,,,,4.,,,,,-,aar,, ,,,a.?",,,,,,i4.,;141,44i,,,:i"';aaji:11,4:''.:"".',:;::•:;•-:-:••-,,.:-..:,•...:-..•.•.?..::":•'••,''',,!t!";1`,A-,,I,,,4 q'•,•-•:••,':-..'•-•.',I,'.'..'; ; '••'• ' •;. :` ••'``'''' 1.-;‘'; "'•. ;''• •;; '•;•'':-;;;•' ; : ''''•'•• •:`';'*;:••i'l: *`;111;#i-i"'' 1MW,•••1?,,,!,,,1-, .'.';.,•','..,! •!••''.;:-.5'.,:',,,a;', 7,::;"°;.'"•';;;;;::':•••;(:".;11.;°.a.', :iittt14,re';'`.;;:7; '..'.,;,,,,:".::('„'..t.,•';:•, -'..• . - :'::.' ' `- ' ,!,':,';;;,'';', • ‘•.:•'''';';.` ,,,I.•;',,'''',''.'`-;,.`:.,":;.Irr.''f?:;';";•• ,•-aliff;•4.ti`'-: ''1,141; '' ;`.1',.i ••• ll''').; :'..;;;;-;••,:i!''..,i.1"::•;', ,••,..-i';.';.''.';....!..i' f 4?:.,.‘t -:.,.-,,,,.,,,_.;. ; - . ,.., 4,. .,„; , .,, ,,, ,, ,,:.,, _ ,, , ,,•,,, ,, ,. ,,, ,,, ,,,,., , ,,,,,„ ;;:•'''''''•••1,'4-.,•• -,7•',',,,....,-A!.,;+.•-gio. i...,:t. . ,;;',Ii;,.-,,,,-;,:•.,:',.',:i': ..,.,• •'..=.4,.::.-.4.. -.; ,,.,.,;..,..i.„,,,t4,-. ...-..,,,.;;-•,7,,,,:,-..;4,,,,,...,• ..,.,:.... . ,1 -... .,,..;;,.. .- '-.;4;!.- ;,.-:.:. 4. : .•,,..,..4.; : , , 4...13.',,'1'•.•'1i. Z. ' '''O'T'?,' -'•';1`'.'t,:k!flA,L"Cr',14,'.1:-,1,ii.).;;;';',.;..?;:,1;'.11n;,:'6:: ' ::•••'•L '''•::Ll'ill'''k.,-15,4t7P1''''''..:•+1.''''1::j,.... ''• ':'''' -.• ":1 : •..,‘ -...';'... ',,i,..';';' .;•: ':'.'''." ;;' 7 r '• :::.,,,:,.. :','••••,"..,•';',.:.;::':::',.::. ••• l'''.-::: "••; ; *:.':•'•:', 4,411.p.k,,,7;"•:44"1, 40;;44104-'.-.4.-'41:4••'1.,'"0:4:''''''.4 .1 NI,‘;''..:.;••;..1.,;.4•••,••;311.-414:1•14.1-'.':,'.•.;"•••,: • ..:,•. . 1,;.. • '.....•• '4.1;01,ii ',...:t1 73.V•'4.;•:'-:"'.':,':;'-'::'11',,•'•••.',',r.t,' ".d.`. ,W.,,,k1,p•.,,I.! E.17,‘,,' :7 .:%: •'' ; ''`• '.' . :.'• '7' ',.•2. ;'-'' •'''..j .• ' '7'''.'- '..•' . 'li-..,..;-' `.:.. i •.:'i.."••••;';') ,-,.q.ti' -,.,:,,,,-„-q,...,-.4..;-•°'-,,,,,,::,,,,../<.,.,:,;.-,14,..,i;-.'•„1,,,,./,,,Pil-'5.;-.•"-,. ..;,..' ,....i•.-. .,,'..,,...,..; ;I.::,,;;i::;}.,;:0- ..,- /'•.t,.-',';...i.-,;,'-. •,T....•.....;‘,., ;: :: i-- • . , ,•' . .,.. ' . ; : , ...• ; .-.',f.: ,.;•,,..i. „....„..,,,,..:4.f.:i::.. ,.; . ;!•••-',i,;';',;,:,4,,.1;',•,-• $,•'4,....1,1-.;,•:'-....•.".".-2 ,..„.1..;:• ii`;.',"' 14•..,-gittil•-`4.1-44'.,.. .,:-•,'...4.2... ,,,,Y;4...:::,..:ii•'.''.,'".:1,',`:.`•,'•'•'f,Y,',"'.:,...',41,717;.,•••••.;-:7: •.:.,';',;i:'',;;•-••:.,:,:•,.,, .: f:,•;,':,'.•,• i.,., ', •-,:,-3. ''a,;4.;-;',.I.,,• ',...':%:,:',.' ;r. •,;.:,,,,..,.'.7,,-. ,. ';:.'"-::','F ,,,,a,-,•,,"•!•;"•;',,•.1:4.,:a7.i':,S,,:;;;. a`;,...:4:1,4,..4`.,;,,,,!,‘,,,,f.".!.4,-,-,,,,•a',,,:•,,,a,•••::-,a,1•;,,3:.a4::,::•".:,, ...,,,„:,,,,:.:.:,,:ay,1,:i.`,,,,-;i':•41;;;.,`•,.:',,,•;,--.:,'.;,-4";''•:,'''.;:•:;'•;.;'• -• ,1•;,•.•,... .:• • '••I. . " ;, "a• . :. . , , :.,,::.---•'i;.,;`,.".,a";,,::,' !.., , . ,i:;;••.,',.,,.'it',..211:41t,"",-;;.;",=.';' ‘„,f..,,,.,-;,,4,4',;,,,•:,.:.:1,4,:.•,..,.?r,-11-tiri.;.:.7,4;,?•,P:v.,,..,!,::.,,,,,,.,; ;Qi:,1:.,,.:.,,;•„,,,..,...,,,,:...:--,-;:•,...,,-:,:i•;;;...,!-.4.-_,.--. -- • ;..,:..;...•' ; ,. ,,,!,•,,,,,'... ,.:,-,'.',,..r.•.' ' !,:•...,i':•,..,, .,' ....".' ., .,4:1.;:';,,, ;.,.- . ,,,_-'.:',i'.4.';,..'..•;.;-,.,;,-,,....,...,i;•:--•.i.L...1,,!..i:J.,.-.',,..,,,it',.,,,,,,.:',,,,,...,,....„,,,,.:;,.,- ...,..;,-,,-.j:,••-,!I•,1:,,i,.....,:,'•, .....,c.;•,,,, ,a,,, a) , . . . • ..• .•',...k,.,,ff.:-.4:11,-;-,,-, ",.,,,,,,s1t-li --,'4,;.t,'4•,;.,:-•,,,-.4,.....-•:',,-;.;. ,.•,...).-.,..•;:.,,Ii...-i.,...L :.';'.1.,,,:',r,Ai., 0 . ;.,,,,,....,,f..,,,-,,..,-,24.0,;,;...-94i1,4,,...,-;,,,,,,.F•,0;rx,Wb..k ,7,i,.4..•ir;•$-'.,.,••-•,..4,?.' „'•,-':,,,,,,,:4,;,..,r,•,,..,.--.,L. ,:.-• ..;:..'--'; •,-- ..-,.•••,,t.',','.!,6,-,,:,,, 2...;..•,•:,,,'ia_••,, . , p...,.•,..-; ,,,:i...,,i,,,,,., > „ . , 0- .. •''••L`;',41'',..:•;31i4::;,•';,:;•,!)-:".;',,f`..`11.',,t,.....-:,.,..1,,t.I.,11.!•,,,,..,,--,.:...,,,,. ,,,=,'..„,,,,..;.,, ,..,,,‘:,J7'.4. S- ••• '...:' "• .. •7 • • ; .- .. •,P: '' 1:• .' . :. .... *.,• .. '• '.•I,:- . ; • .. •;7';„.1,''',.. . • 'e''.:‘"', .;7?,•?:.,,,I.X.2.).7,-/`.1,-,',.0,,...t 4.,., ,,y,C,Vt-',.•,,,,,I.777,•Ja' N'.;,40'.',:i.';,,I.,,',• ;1,',':.*.;i,•,"..; :•...'„;,..'t,,,,...1..,.-, „k,,,g, 1:1) -,,,,,T•• 1,••• 7,:-.;':`a,:';-",1';I',',a ,.;,'•:,'." •,' ' •:. ,:--`, '',::',•I•.•-a.' ;: •,;•;,::',",,,,!!,...',74,,,I;t:,:',;,;„,;,;ta,,,c4;?.-,a.,;;Afti4,".;":„iiip',,,,:',',.:4,:::•,',,,,::,..a,,,,,p,a,'••• ...,', .;.;.;. • ; ..; .„1;'...--.;,;,; cn . .': • : • •..i' ', -4' -2-..: .,-,)::-...•Hi;,•' ':).-..:' ;6'.,..-„k :'.,2-•:•i---',.'.';'--.., ;..: ' '!--,---.'',;:."•-het:. : ,3';......,..,4y),,,i.', i- sq::s-...:?-.-..1,.:.-4,,,;..-..',. -::.'4F.,i .:'••.',.•,..,::;',(,'...-',.VN .,'.;..r,i' '...':' ',1.1.41A',.',Iwi';f1-4,,et•;.f...41#:..,°.".;(,,rP4'1'-•-•'''.--- ''.• • : .'- .' ..' -.1.- _c c.., ...il„a,',."-•"..",;',,,-:,1,av,i '",..0.,...':,;, •,,,,,r1a; 4„,,,,-: '•41,:;!Pali.",‘,...f.:•,:l'a•',.:,.'Laia,:''t;',. ' '.:.t,'•I''';'-•..'ee.`'',•';• ; 4-3 ;•:f''';:•''''''''',;',fe.';'''' :1';iie-'•,M4,1•;:', . ,.'tf,,, •?{'fr!I'' l';''''''';'''';1''''''i'II'''':J''' ''''L''''''' ' ''' r— .,I:1:',-;•;'4'''.•••;.:;;;;1';''' 12:,•:..."%:4Iit'''''.,1-,..'''''''.:•'iki.:';'•:'1;!:•'1'4%"Y- ::;';'''...'-':'1.'1''.r.':•,'•7 ! ;,;'';'1.: ) cd En W .., :..;; ',,;,"I': ' ' ,...,: ;,!',';; .•;‘,j• :'.',, ,.;!;•',. ,;..•;;,'; ;,;,-;,;;;;;;,,;;,,%;,; ;,,; ;'" •; •1•"; ;;••;:.•';',•,;;.,:! • ,,‘.. t.k.:•„' , , •1•;..;., •• ' • ;•.: ';;'• r' ' :.':'•!''',':il.'..;';'..1.!'"•';;t-Ill'i:'.4;•;:',t,,"7'.';'I '':;;;,;.1;"•,:,''';''''.!i,..;ii,'-'.'•;.!;•,;!f: ,,:,e;.;•%.1:,,.•;.%,,, ...i.:; = .1— :'';'%•••,•;;;;.;,. ; 5•;, ;•- 3:11''" ‘ •-Ili,;,%,; ',:••• ;,;•; ,.,•.;; ..q...j.;.- :;;;,,,. ;:;„. ;i]..,;•,,,,-;..; -CS '• ;.• ,. A„,-.;•-%. I ..,;,,2% .•••1111,-.1;;,i,,%.,f,41'5;4t7;10".-•.....!cil;'t:' ,11•:;:.•.C.,,' , ;.4!'" c,,,j r— 1••d- •,- . - CD ".!..,, "; ::, • . ' a':,:t'.-,;: ' .. ;;;•••- .:.' •-•.,L,',,:.'":::,;:,;' •;;;. ' ;•,.'s,",,-;•:i 1.4,1fistnea...,a,•,,,,(1.,,i,. „:„..;„-., .,,.,...,, ,, , ,. ,,1„. .,,,,, i,..,.,„, ,,,,...,„•.,.,..,,,„ ,,,',::,;4.••...'-'44 l'-•- :•••;,i..,::.."" 41;'...;.1'.;..‘r.t•r:: .J.;.:::Hr,.",.•..•r.i. •'.••:: -.:•;•::,...,' 'I'••"•,:;,.,:' ,":•;.?,'1„':...i:.:Jia•••':.•.';',4:,1•,4, .4'"•".t'•-.8.".•••,.. ;,;•:.'6.1...:,t,:,,t'a:°Y0f,,,;. i,,..;..,,'' •Y:;:',.,,,I,:••-1:.•e",a i-- = I In co c1:1 on CO :- • ':'";;• 1. '••••i•;-•,,a;:,-', '-- .•• ';;,; .1-.",'a ••. ::`,;:''' ;!;'•j',';',"'- :::, ' 'i•l''''''''••••.''''' .14•M•iO4"••;•••'' .Pglilt,i!gi?;!'••;',•'i'''''.."1':..1. ''.4 '••,' '•:'''1:.'.'','•.''4''',.4.: ,•.: .••',•.,•:•,• 1•.,•, , .. 0 al 'rk, In ',"• •::;"!•;:',•••,"':;'. • ''• :''''','2••••••• '''''''''.".' ', fl''',.:1;.; ••..‘.. IC .,•,..'1,:„'••irf;4N, itl.'X'4•,••,4'''' )<,•••.'i'A'N1:4,'''•••• ,164:".*1'':. rA';;•'It..'' ''.'•; .4':•4 74;" • . 'i'4'..'':::' .•. ..,.6 I....I.'''. 0 a' !:•''••4%;'''...:: '.... '•'.::' ' '•• •I • •••'1'•.'''''' . T •• ;I. "'2•.•':••:‘4"• ,• ';'.'';'•.C:4'itlii"&;[4:',),,,,,,'••••'I l'....i."10''''•i;•;'•;0•4'.2iT:',f...1f4.•,:21.14'444',...0! 4;. .'•7"L ','•' '•,•''''.',. '1'4''.•41.4!•fl..•,...', 4f 0 () ''' in . •• {•i'll•','•4IrAtIli•kr•••'1,•i•:••4'?•'4•'•k.•• ',.,••••.P4•1;:f; '''ik,4.' *'14:4•4f',,.:..4 ' ':.'!".•4.Y.:'i 4 . . r 4!•', •f•.,;• ' a',.n..,i,i,...4,..f.f,-(••'.'',•:.,,-;::,!;;i0.,,,,,,....,,,at,i.,,,....,,,,,,,,:,-.34,4,,,,i,:ii,:i , ,, ,.. 14._ 4-- 0 ' '. .. , • , :,II— .•• • i:i' ; :.•;,••.:',.::, ;',,,,..:a,...3'.-a •:f; ,..ia I.,;,•.loi.a',..,,P, ,•,.',,::--;!••!;,0:; 2•:,..''',•,'-':. ''f,,•:.':',',••`.;"':...,,•3-..i;F•;;.'r 0 0 -I-' (d ;',••;.•, .',, ••!' ' 1;;: ''•;-.',) '...i •''; •,,,•.- •". 1••• '`'.'"," ',:::'a; ::.,4• . ;•.ii0:Iitii‘•11m•k;.'.:-.,; 4ii.,014,,gfri ,i-!. ..4.,v1-P.i-!4•4.-.‘,,',--:'..,-1'.':! ,....'..'.;•!..,..'.:--.,, .,„.:-...,•, ',.-,• (../) •,--- .'';•.--,-;')e,...-•'1,•:AV:h:.:•;,1•;,•'1 ,...‘:1:::,.•,:r1,1•••;;;."'',...,..,.i:• ,-',,' - 4` ',.. ',r;:-',:•:': •,':4',./A'•••••4.rr . a) 0- • • : :: - :,•• •••••:':ei,t••••,•; -: I: :i-1 .:.• • . ;.--.t.•.- ,,,....e.:,',,, Ile-, ;•.',;'..i.,•••••--;1;,'',3•441'. . . ...,...li•;.7.::411i•-.43':':,;'+i.*','"RV•il,',IS. .:,.j.::•-. ''•‘•-•'1'-; '•rT••:, .•;,,t ;"-,-,' '.•':...,."';,-'i• .L -i.,.,, ...:,;,;!..y,,,,,.4q4.11,..,4... ..41;.i.,.,,,,,i,,,.,,,,,,.-,,,,,,ik,,z..,;.iti:,-,,...i. ,I.,- i.,,: a. co •,-- >, .,., .; .-ii.• .. - --:-!.i-?••.,.P......;....• . .• ,,,..., '..• ,'• ::..,•--;;I.;.•;•;,.:,...,..,...' I.., . ..-1 ; .4 --•.• ,-... .4.-:. .:,•„‘,... •,. , :;„." ,, ',.•1.'..',•,;•,.:4.-,..;,.•;:', k''';•-"•••..-''''..f'i,k:'. ••-"';`,:,'--•'',',.0"fiOi'i...,0. ;.41,' ,r,e,'-'•;;;`;'',•,•;-.1."..:rii.',.:.'.;!..;::•...t.3,,..,-..._ .,,,.,,4.,.....4,..,- cu -4-) rd '-- (:] (r) •—"— CD '.. ',P,n4e'),'•eiteic;:,1)4;:rk..•••;:::,44`•,,,•' ,',..11,,,,,•, ..."4 '•C• V.:di.",',..i-;••••:..,••. •••;"‘1?-1 ''‘,`" a. ••••••r4. ;'''';.r;:,•;"'•.;':::*1'''',,r,,r,;,`,, ,.,",.-,40:%,,,. , 1:t.... •-"!;;I'' ;;;;n:',',2i1;.; i'.•'•'• ";4,;',.-•';'7d.e: ",'''`4,;',I: ;:....':•;,''.''Ii:.!';;;;:V''. '' ,i., S:,ii,1.`•'1,:', ' •: ' ',a';'2., *;,,11. • '•:b;';•''', ,;:I.'*.`",'`'-' .•,t':•-';'•.3; ,••,.••,•-• •. .• • ::I, ,,:a:' •: : 4. 11 4;'•,:j4•4'...."ITh•.;4'.4.4%4'1': '4•64' '''•!A'','':::11,:•;.?;,'• f. ;i4'.:',ii,?W:4,1;•"il,*,;'‘.\V•Ilk,,i•,;',.4•••iA;NI:.',4';•"•'..:,,.','!'.‘, ''•:•.'0 ii.',....:•.,•:":if'''.•'''';.''',..'"i•:•;,:•'',.'ii,!''•, . 7' . . ,,, ,..'4. : , ''I,..' • ..; • A ;!,•,.,,....,,, ,,,.. — ,-' -,:.,;,,,,,,,:;,:u,, • .,,', .4.,u-''. „'-',4,1 .:',4,-,,,0.,4A-L,..?.4',,,, „'e.„,'t,':i.::.:,1,,,,'4,',.,.'•,,,,,- ',,,..,.',i,-,, ...'.,.4,.. ,,-; ..,,T ,,..,1,41;.;;;:.; .,-„;,....,....,,i ss,:.,,',.,:;.....,,.., ,,,.., .1',,,1 •,. . ,;:'.• i, ,, :.,-, :..,...i.s.-•,..,;.-..-f:?' 4.....,....,,,,t:'-,,;:1•7' '.iki,-,,:liji,,'. 4,7ftreif:.',.,..r:'-',i.._..'-‘.!„.•---i',,...•' :i .:;:::i;:„;,-,.ri.,.,:'l ' ,..,:...'.,:f:!,,:11;,:-i'k'-r-':.`‘k'',:,-.i'.-,t'.:r..i'-'-..-'.'.:..: ', , ','r,-'::':: "i',''.;1 -..•,!".:.:.:::''., ,4'.:,;,','',-,. '• •I'l,''. ,-:,.: 1i -''',,..',.';,:.!:;.,.; • .,, ,‘.i'ii,p'.''.'1' t.W.p.";::i.,4' -::.-4:k9',:t.'7;1`4'.,:;11i,,V,,:7';'ff,:if,.,:,i;:::,i'..,:!`:/d ;f:,,,•-',,-:,l':;.,:.1.1`;?IL-2.!,;',',4C,;,:'..'"-:1,-;."}.',',..y:,;.44,'',,;,'',,7`.,4••,::,,',••.,„:,:.;'' . 1.''..;.'•' •,,,i' ••: •.'; ,,''',..",,;;;`,,f,7; •:::,'• .';'; ''';';',;',,,,• ',I.'",,; -,',.,,,.•:•,,•,:::.•.,;,.,-,.. :, :'":":, .,%:',.''•••!Ia, ;I";;k',:f.!, ..,„_,::,..',i.0,°i•;;L;;Ia.•,' ,',;;::1,',',•,,,,t'4,.:1,1,,,,,:r.',-":".;:tar4<-,::-•: :',,•:;i:,..• `,.•:',:',;',.:;•;.,;.,:••,":;;',;',„11,1,„:::;.;!04:"..01.,•;•,1;",:;;•;:a•••;';',`,;,-:V';`'..;',,.;;;••'.,,•:.•;`: '": ,:":,';',....: .'!: ''•• 1;';;;;' ••:;;;. ' ;i : •!,•• ‘;' :!::;', ' " ' ;.•":•'••;:'1,':`•• ': .44ii,,n!:,k:;,1•1;;;AI:;;;;_:2,y;;;;alt".Tai,',',..,'.'4,1, 1,1.•:•':..,;'‘ ::: :•,, .' '.--•';' '••::'' '':••i!:;1 94. '''.."r:,,:'-'''`:;•-•-•'•-:' ,, .' ' .. •,• ; ..:, , „,a.`„, ::", ,,,,,;;.:?•;:•.,,. ;°"" .' : • '-.•';•,''':,!,',:,:•• '',,:,•• ••••••;:' ,;,3.,,,':: 'Wit•,..'.25,‘%,Z,m;'1,;;'•,::af tl,f..'',:t,,,.',,,:a!'al;',1-';'a.:';:••',!;-;';,','•;;;;"', 1'.'I- '::,'!;,,;,^;11•4;2 -4`e::•,, a: ,:''.','''• '''.•'.•:.' •,.' ; • a:„ '•0 .,:•;• .• ,.•,„'., ,, •. , :.;. : :. „ ' !",••••.'.' ,. ;;;;. a'.;'3.,1',,,•;;;;;:a a,•.1I,‘".,:-,".-',...:9:•,,,-:,„,,,,,,a.-• a; •,a a;;;• '-'';, ..,-,•••.:,,!:::,.,,,,, , ' • . .,,,,, •., ' ,-,,.. . ,•1 a: ..-. . ..,, , .,, • . ',„,, •: ,„,-, a• ..':qt?•••'1:4;:;•;ht!".• l' L: r:'`''' ::::1•1.0p;t:Itt::,:!'!"•4114,P,;-!;;;t1:',;;V!`,:•;!','A'-'af•da ';.:::1 •*; ''''. •,°,;';'..' ::::::,'.''',7't,';','t..'0-7‘,;7;,...:;1 .1: 7:1-77,>, .•,,:•;-•:. ..'•7 ( i -,•7 ,*,,„; •,,I,,:.P,41,4-tift,,,A,',11,..,",•'!..;,14.1*ill,1,1r.,;-,,,-,-A •,',',1;;"..,.:t;:ii, f ,I., ,....'"',`'.;;;; ;;7•4,••`„ ';•••`;'.": •:,'•.:,::!: `;•:;.•:'I.:,. '. • .1 F.i!.,-,1,,,;,,,, ,,-;,-,,,i:.-,:;„,,,,,,,74,,,,,,,4,,1:::••.f;,,,-,4q:-rel3 .;-?;21'.!':'•:!,•.• • ,:•,,I,;:e:r-• '.-:,,•.••:' t4 -,.. , ..,. ' • -: , •. •;:,• ..„.„. ,• ,..,.:,.,.;..i:, ;i5-.•,,t,!.--:,, -:,-, .,:1 •• ••4.--:•-,•:•,,,,:!,,•,••:••,•:•:,.•, •.:-.-, •,-; -:, . ' •' :: - '„It 1%.V,•:'' ''•L•%14•',..,-.•.!:r.:•';'or4.;."'.,,Ir..,,,..')...•#":.•,,'•'..,'.'1”-,..!,':•,':...,;;,•.%','":.,'.%:....,,.•,..•A;;;;;;..,•%••%T.';:i.i;:1%• ' •.. .H..,•' ; . . ... .- , ' •'".!.:M':.;',-,,,.:';',:;',X,:; „'..;.;„.•;;;.,,,; '',,,,;.;;•,,,,!.i.0,,i,,Ivii1;;;,,,,,,i•.1;.:,;1).,;;i;.,,,,,,;;,:,,,,`;•,.;4,,,,%';;;.'';''''', %"1,';;;;.',:;%`,12;,;!..,;;;"•%.','„,.•;.'.•.;.;• ','i. . %; ' — „ .., . , '':..2:•,1,::'!::;.'A'iL L.'.;'.i';-:44.';r.:•!..,.°1•4',L4 L'•'•:'.•,,ti, ..1.i 2..•:•1:3:''',;1'.',„;V';,•,...„ ;'•':.,•. •';.,.::•1•.....„.. ,,,,. '..,••.'.i,./ ..f.,•.;',',.' ,',,.. . ,,. .:• .,' ..• .'••'•1,f-•'F.,. 4.12,•;,(''''• .I'.••Ly'L.%,LS,. ',1',.':'lle`•;;Li.6.'Its;',A•'. .••`• ,•1•.'• ..'•`. •'...:.';'.'. .•••••S'"1..'il••;•''•1'''';}••:•1.''••'...•'L, ... ''..-,.r• •••••••••', • ',..;C.;••••{•,'..e:e ;.'"Zei'••J•''''''''.'f Y ,-,V}.,4".."',.,;'••••.,;VI':••ii;;‘,'..?1,,..::5' ••...:1,,:,:-.•;',.:...:',•,:4 :.:).".•,,P:.•ai -;•,•,,,,,,-"1";';.;•,': '"1.• • " ': - •!: ' .' " '•'- ' . • ;.-, i ,'•• •a':-. ;', ' I';'•‘' ." . , '';;;;;•;;;;;.!'it;3•::' 'i-Valt`;;;;1•'•,7-1•';'• Y;;;;2:'; ',"'Iall'•0'4',•:`,.!,•',.;,,,4°, ;"'; '.'',. ' ',;!."-,••',.` :,a,•.',tr,,:',V,•,-.•',',-,•'•,°,,,,''111: ' - ,..',,'.- .':,, ,•,;•: , I: • .i. : : I:• ':::,. . ••'- ''',',.:-.• , : • : ,'l'• ',....:.•":. '°''''.,:',"•••;'_';.;'.';' • ";L:::';'.'';INk"",•;.::':::::41:-;;.',4,3.''''.-:'•::,".t.51.;-Vi,4,1'7;'",..::,i';'.:',-i,')'.',',....;;''.';:‘.':.'' !,'"••••i:I!'..";:r. .,':',:',,,,,i•-";:,'..•,;-,'.',6': I. : ,.'r-.:•'''' ' •'' • '•,.'•''.:: ' .! -,, :. ' ,,',....• .•':.i"'••.:; ,: : ::::!.:,. ' ',. :„-,.',:".":,,::‘,,., „;;• . 1}''''1':i':",'''•i't fr:'%•:i.r.:5:(i'',4',:iVr;,'-';'.7Sfe''..:.'',11thVil.:4!t.:,,,..1:;;kiii:';'-'•':iei';,: ',',;-:,_*•;',;.•::.i-',4,;.'i',••.-,-'':::-...;;',11.''',•;;•,-::::".:,i:l''::::•'':.':•'-;-'' ",•:- • ..''•';; *. .: , :': . I :..,-• i,,,:',-:.I-',..':::::f-';i.i''•.:• ,'.'.'. "i::'" .:•. ,'', ": •'..',:;•••J''',.. ',',, e;;;,-;=,•:;',,:••:.:0,:,,:,, . ,',,,,:4•:::,,,,...:4,‘!„,;,,ei.';!•,!".1„,iiirj‘,;q;,..,f4;, ,".. :.:,.,,,,r•:;••••,••••:-;;'; •.;;:;;;..;.,',;,:f;c1T.i'Qi ,:..,1,;7 ...,"•,,;; ,,';';.;;,4.••';''..:. .. ..;;C.-'.• ';!. ...'• '•; '‘'':' '; ...,;.; •,..'.. - .:., ••••:' • ,.• • ; 1,"•,::• •',• ..;';,•., :'•i'.''''''''''''.;•!..;•.*'•• ;••1•.0r'' ;OC:44,' 1.117:'4;•• t. '' ''':•:•'rfii•;•':ci'•!.1''''''', .";•';',':'''' ,4!"., 4.1''.(.:44f•:••i',;4,.•..'. .4••• •'.'.'''' '•4'‘. ;4• •:.•: •;•' i 4'•;' ; ''''1• '. t.:'';•.•. 4:4 4 ,• ; \•4 ••• . 4•••• • ';' . ; ‘. .. ; 4. '',1•c!!'•;1''',••t;•i.'4';'.1'''.:.' ''',.;''i""'''''.1;;;;ALtL• 41111.''•ife'Pl''•Zi:i?Y41!:.,..!,'.'I'.',1,..••;•••‘,..•'.•.•''•••::'''''',.: '4.4 i 4'''',.;..•.';''';.4.:•;:',...7.!:'';.3';',3.:•:'4';'::'''.'[.' 4'''.4°.;•;:..ri'•""••:.''I•J I ..'''''i.:'•''' 1 '.• '' ;.•••:'•••.:• ''••441?'•'•.•. ''''• "I- ;"'• •'' : •.'.;V •:• ' '''; L'.l'•"'•I' '''•1':••;'• '';•• .31'1'144.4fik'1":41'11'•:eiT47P P'•l'Air; '1:1:!"i'':1•i••4.1.6••4••••, '. . ';'•''•••!..' •%;••"';''' ', : ''''''•.• '••• ;4 „• •14.,• . • ; ,.. :". j••4'„ .,!•4,...••....,4 • ,f 4.,•, . 44,. ,, .:k',•,)' .::. ;•;.. tI.r .,').';',''1!jk•.A';,•."•,e• '0;445144 4 tik•I',":.'',.•.;,•;14,";•:. •4 ' •••••4!."••:":••:II'•: ••••'4'Y4',.,i; ''',•,....,4, , 4.,,.,14;'4 4 44.•• •'••.• • '•, 4•.' ••"; • 4 " 4 ;', ' '''.'.....• .4 . •. • 4'I r '., ••4 ••••••••••'•. 1'4'r•• ‘'' '''J;•••.;'•••'''•'' 4'.•'.' •rIti'4,P1,::•;•ilitc.4$;;i::4: 14•(;':':„•.:',.:;.. ..,.,:1'1,,,;:•.1.• "....••.` •h,.."..•'. :;•••••1'..' • .-:•• .•: ..'• .• : ••• ..,••-. :•-•, '':-.. :,... .•',.. . '1. ••:.r•2'.- •'• „.4 1 ;::.i••:'1":4::'••eil it4.-Pl"":4.•;;1).41.r.ti.4.., i oit:MOT,',•::::::),.!,i7 1,-::.'. • :::;"'• •:,'••1;,',/f-'1,:fe :,,,:;:-:1:•5:,",-,,.. ..,•, - -'. - ••, :. • • ' ,..- - ,: .J •''._ • ;•:. :::•:.; ; . ,' ' .:;4:.•01,:i1,-,•,. ::,:‘,,.7.1:e.„.2 ,',,-,,'„,i:Q•: . ::i :,:t i„I'.!..,z%f,i:;.•.`tri,..',;i:-;,i;'ji.....-•-'1:e -',,';a' 1;..".,,,:t.',,..,e,',',.•;":1-,...4.,,'',if'..',.',.):.A.',:.' .., :',•':"' ''-'' :'' ''' :'. ': •- ••••::7'' ' :,-'• '-' :.,, ' :• k .::''''-.: '' .1 ,.o,,,A.:(2, ,.', ',' . [...;:,,i-P,:',i,,:;,„,-.;!.,.,1:,,,I.-...,:' .,. ,,... . „..: . • •;.,,,• ., : - .,...!,-.,--. ,‘..,„',,..,::„.:., :. :,. ,.?: . .. .:,.-:.,,,,.,..,c, +t .„:!..„,::1,-,y.,,,0,-., ,g1,0,..,,,qr i,-,i;Aflil,ilt,41,-4.,....4 7:0'.rl'r!,...t4Y.,;,-;;,:.;:.:-5.0:•`•,'-:,','•,..f..1'.. ',-%,-:::::,:;-:::,:.-' .;',..,",,..,::::"•,:.1.Pi,',,, .."..- , ':;• ' ....,. ••';• ; ,. . ,1 ' ''.:."1' '''.:' .' .:.. -'''''. '•'' '‘.. ' .'(.•:'..,;';;;';';‘,.PPC,„4:;•;f.,';-,,q:•,,,c',1.e.w•ll'il,;.,:i:li,,,c,':.;„,..•i. :iN.!,,•-'4;..!•;};ri,,, -;..:4,,..'..::...,, .•.,,.. ;,,,,:.;,.,!. !..t..,..;,......, •-, . . .. , • ., ; , . . '..,•-°:1,",::::,,...„:,444444:.,,,,cli4,41:.,.):!.,,,,-,,,-:,,,,,,,,,f , . .. , ,..-.1.,.::..„,..,,,,!....,„,1::::„..,,,,: "......,,,., ,, , . : ,.•...,, i . . ,,,:: : ;..:, ..., . . . .,, ,, .,,,c•.1.-...,, • ,-‘•.:,•::•,,,,:!-',14:4:i•-':',z...):.::,:.",.--:"e:-;:,:•. • '' ! -';',',:'::,z.:',2`4:::':-:'-'::•• - '':•:' 1.,:::,,,-:Ir•.:!: ,, ....,f4,.1:..„ ,:.ia, 1::•,,e.e„,,,,,,,,;•,":?,-..,•: ,,e,'..,,)' ci : ' ...,'. ::., •' ,.„. •.,,,I,aa-,",.!....,..,-.••.3, ,-,-- - , , ,...,. , . ,. l'a,i;•,•a:4(..',f!•••,,? 1•4',.i.,1t;',..,1..j,1,..;,:,,'.',17,,..`•-••r!,•,;•,:•,:1,, ;, •,J', ..",).,,..•,..••,,..,c::,;!'•''`,.!:,,,r..-:,;......,-.... ;;., . i • ... .',-,.;;.,....,.:,... .:,-.•41,,,..,',:'1-‘1.,;:;:,.,,.::,--0,,,,..,,,, -i,,,;,..,-0...,::;,),;•...,.,!0:.!,•--,4,f.4;'. '•..,,,, ,:.L,.,..,;!...r.,...,,,,,-;,.,i,,,;,.;!..4,.-_.... •‘.,-.;:.:, ,,., . , ; ,..:: :. . .. , . . .. -3.-y.....-.VtI3-'1.--,.. liti--i'3, , ..•.;.''. .• :: . " ''''.."-,.•;..'•:••,::.3,:-'' '.0,.-'" .' . . . ,,,,I,11:';`,;:',411,1•;),!,-,t ,:‘ ;:k7,1,,•,3P4I''a ;•: :- ::!).,g,:i•:; ,',a,,,,'',,::,.1,",,,:,a,":•;a:.• •'',:,•"•.•I • .;4,•1'.•;,i';,:.9,",...•,"1-";`..::',,•,':• '. ';•.,1,;`.•••• 'i';, "'"k:::' 41:(;•"s; H;', "'*;i,•if;*I'l!''.;. '•?,7.$;*;?•asr ':••;-''P;`,• '' ','11.•:,;',,'-',..;;;.:;•:. :;:::....;;:iI.1,,,,:!:;',::,f;';',;:',,".':;.:':'•,:a,,;•,,-,", ,:,'",, ,..., ' .-' : ',"; ., ' .:,;. -:•,''.".':;,!.; ;:1 • ,r,.. i‘.:.!;1•'_,' ''•;!'''1,;141•;''''''••‘,1;'''''",4.• ''::?:.'i','""1° " ;;L:•,.: lit• '`•••:',`•:-.'ji ';;;•,::".:';'!"',",:;.'i;',:{•:';;I,1:.:,:'','a,-,:I;;;),•';•;;°•::'':: . ;:: :•; :-.-;.•'' :a .;; : , ": . ; "'''‘,"' .` : ';. : 4111 4 ,, - -,,.., •,lav,q4;.••,,;,',.....1.?-•"!,.°!.."!it;•,-,,*?:,,,,:::,•,,:;:,:',,'",,.,;(,-,,,,..'..:,;•:',`;•i''';`,ici.".•""i'l•,1•';:' .';: ;,"•,••' f•-: :a••:•'.,,,' :;;II::"•,-••1':"-:• - • , •,, ,,. , '-,•i•,;-',,, -Ic;'::`,..a.•;•--:': ".",,,,,"...::,c,•,•II';',;•;?`.` :;•,;"';' ,-,•••`LaII`•,;:i•'''',•i,•:::';',''.. .:.,;•;•' . •.:;, :5,`,,.' ", ,.'2';','•,f,-- ;• ,,•, , . , ; •;*;-.„ t',',•.;, :-...-''• -i`-" I: •,'.I •''.`..,"' atI"-:, •.',;•.,'; •••••.-,;•'..1',''';',;;•; ,-•";,..,,'` 'i'''•••‘.;;; ',•••:'',•:,•-'.••;',C-,''':I'';`::::,,•:I, '' '•• , 1 . • - - ":,;:,°1;a'',,, •;,;•...--'; `I:.:''':',;.•':';;;;•;•S!,;;';':.•:,1,.;3;'`.'' :''"'t.,.4:-",,4•;;"i,;`-' ' .':,. • ,,' ..;;'.",1';'•}•;;',.,'...,-;•.;',,;''..: • ... - , , . .• , , . . , .. . , • . . , , . . . , •;;', ;;•:It;',;i°•,,••,;',. ;,,''',2,,,-,":,•=.1',.,;',`,;;;*;/,';',...'t; i.i,, ,i .•, .;, : • .:.:! .•,:l. ,,,:l,-I;a: - ,".., ,,,:• ,. ••, . . . , . . .• ,,• ' •" '•• ' ••'a'''',;• :'; •". ' °L. : ' • ""•-•,' -, , ,;;;,..a,',:,1,-;".14;',,a".1...:•.":"'.;;•:!. .:•";••••;. :4',,•it,•'•,••`,:',1;, .;:.. ;',."':•,. , ',, •,;' • :.'',',ill.:-•,;'•':;'..';',:•:'• ',i; .,::;'..''''',::: • : • ' :' , . , • •• . ''-'•' :. . . a. • . ', •I.: - ',.',, .• :; ', ,:;•i• ••.,.". ).1 •,...;Z''. r!0 ,.R..'!..!'''''..•Aini..,',,n,'*:,,,,'.1 Trt..,•:,;.-..'.;', ,f,',.,=,,,w-,1-14:414f?.;li:'.3,•.'n:: "......,,, . .-'-•'..,,• ...:.,n.,,•'.;',5•;,ep.4, ,:e,Iii,,, ,IV.,••',, :.',•c .'.•,•,; '. , „..,•`;i.L.,-; ,,',',' t;,,•,• ,',. .,,, ' ; ' '.','!•:• ;' •,, :.•'''.. ';',i‘:•;':"4' '1'' Ali:',•‘.''''..'4:1kY't4,•it'4,,,i),:iiV .-:''•';:inet'.'41" ';',i" ' .•,,,,,,•• ...„,,,:' '.....„i,•(,-:,,s-;A4,N . ,..,7.Ft; ,:','L,,,,••:-.•:,,I'•'. ; ; ',,, '' ',I . . '. : '1'..•7;;.ft'e••••••••,,,e,_:',1•1,1,"•••;ei,..."e,e,,,,,I..'.,ce,,'',:,;,'j•k,.),,I,': 1.,'-V4A1,,;•••,),;..,',;,„••,,,, ,,,,1 :„. i'i;•.,1•,,,,,t,,,,,,,,,.,,,,„:,1, ..,., „ ,, ,,,,., . ,. , , ,,, ,.',,,,..r.,,, ::.o.,,.,i, ., k.., .,„,.., ,,, ,,,..,,.. ,,,,,,,,,. , . . •; ;•:•ti, .ree .'=e;:/, :' -.,•.•41 "eit!',•:,,,:, ,il?':',o,;1:•,,i::-'-''.,ii;::‘,:::-4...:,:•4• , • !:::...,•':.f;:i",•1_.-_,::i,c.,e,r•.:.,•:,„;•;•::-..:,.:'.- ,,,,,e;;,:: '' .:• :•,::::••' ''.•-,'''e•-' - :, ;')' •::::''::•.::'',:-: • ,-,k•:'. ,::::!..:••!:',,:-.';'...!n' ttiff. .';• *•;:;'..!q;,,t.,: i,r'v".,-;:•:•.-i:,,-•:' '::.',•;,:•";•'-•'•:1,i","4-,.".',:',:,:',1 "-•::.!*,•1;....:');=:',f.o.:;',•:'1).',-.,--':',',',,:e,,'".r'i•. il •••'•, 4•1.,".,,;4. '.,,,f1••4•.:•%•,,.CT,4 '.,'"••'•i..W!.t.i''.•1`. .4•,••••••"41,,,,..",•••141'.,'le.ii,..;f•'„,:i ,i'....4 4:',.4,., ,•.11, '1.,...i.,',:., ,,41.1,:i•'',.ir...,„...1„,:, ....,•,.., ,k,..,)' • :... •• ',. •.• ,•''.''. .',•'1...'.;••:' ,".;1•. ';',;,•.!•' •.:.." 4 ;',4"4:;.:3.•.... '1'1.4.: "! • '.i.•i;••1';'•••14Vf.kni0.i.'4••.'4.:1,4,'.4'N'.:"..ftiA•04,4',".•";4 4!.' ;4'•.,;'41r4•4:;1•," .'11 .."..•'',,,•..•;.4' •%;;;...:::;4 4;•',....,„,14••f‘i.k.(2.•,1411.;?i, "FA,,,,...,; ••', 'I..'..;. • • 4, ••• . .., ,4, .•4„ ,,.4 4 4 f);•;•4 1"h.' 4'• 1 :4•.. .. ... .', '4.42. '.:' 4'•••{. '4•',.';;.k.'"•.'''''•,4:S44•0.4464••••4;',4"'d•'••;',4''Vtti•c''.W.,,,,q;:i.44. • i'•••••:::' 1..•..',••,4!,.l••,4•4,...,7, ; •.;4:•;, '1'4', ,;:r, ..--,'':1••',';,•';;'-e,'e';';ke:if;:. `•'',0,, ,,•••,;•,.,, c, i',, • . .• ,.,.•,•., .•,,,,...,,,.;',;,.,,.,.,,1::, ,,,,,,, ., ..;.,..,,,.,:,,f;,.':,r•—,,,. .'•'..:--.,.,`:1.,•,:',',1i'v,%ik,,7-"...'.'.i y.'s.:,-,.:,,,,,,,;t4 ...~.k , 5'- f'..-,;-.:....s,z:')ii,i'.:;.} ...-., , .„, ,•,...• i.. :;,iii.,!•,,,, , :',-I,•,'' .!; ,';:• .,'•. •.'..••,•. ,L. •.,L • ••..0,•:, , .. :,;;I:.,•;:.•-.!: .,: ,,,•,•,•,4•.,,.,, .,: . • ...,.....1.,•..••1..,,•• •! !'i... '•i''..'1'i••••';'''''1;;Ijarili'll.P;L- 111•41:tt'45r...klt .N ..pt:...`fl.;Je'.'jil! ....'•':'L:L,I.'•'.: ;•••.1'.,!;11';,.:1•AILiq 4 ;',•tf•."•'.'.•Lil '.LLi1;..,,e'1,•,',L:,,;,,L..'•k . , :L`.r.,•.•. ,L! i., ...:.;•I'.. '••••••'..,.:•...::::!: , ....,,i•.il:L.L:•••'..; .„ '1::••,L;i,....,...•,•.;',, L., ••• °"'.'''L,1,...,:., •'•'*4,...!'f.fil, i 4.;.,',i,i.....yr .!.14-.P.,„,... •Pe;'el'.',:.: : ...,V,:r:,,,, ',.-,le!-,..:,-",Ig',..":,i!!'!..1:;!::41:'.A.,:'4'.=,i,,,,,,,;!;-f..',3i`.,:::`;•:. '' '`''''.if•'-' '.;I: ; • :a,',"',, '';° .,..;•:'':•.i-'• :', •,';'.';•,';:e•I. •' • L•... ;!;L..!..:',.: •:L L•F: '.:,:,::;:::.•:,•;:4 7,-1744.•:.:':':.:•1.,•,•11.1i1,L.";IrWg1 •:':1'..:1111104::::•,'.:14Vi;-::'..:".,•",'..,•1`''',.."...:;;•j.::4-'.*:•"•:...:2......?:•::::.;.:.::li''srelir•-••;-::::'"rli''''.4..'::•'••;• '=:::-:::: •-,.; ,,, •'.; . ";.:, , .. :ji"..: .:':,,i:'',„;:•.! , .'''..,;•.`,',4 • .,••.; ,,r f,......:04 ,.,',•if•,.';',, ..:4"....*•4:.•:;•i,.. .; , :i,:=.4::;:':i0:;r;":::e•-„Ii:Z!.4. :'.! ik•!..C••,:it''•!..,:q4?:4::.."1.:1:-..i;:f:••Ir'.••,r•,•••••..„:-..-•';':.',•;:: .;:.;`,::ifzi;•,..... ,i'"•• ,,,:,,,,4,,•-...... ,•;:::••:::,.::1,"•:,1 : , :: '' .•:: ::: • ••• ::s'i•;••:. .: '...:••' ::..." 1, :: :"•.,•.'.':•••;;•J•;:::::':.;::•'•••:.• ..:7' i:•,•:.4.' V:":Ji%;•-,••;... ,:i;",•;,:-'',,.•-s4 .;,':::•••13•??.1'1 .'111,, •.:'.•.;:•:•:•::,..' .1...•'.';:.'"•:..•••• • ' :II. .••• ' ' '':•:I:" :'I:14.:: ' '1::1"::::::". ::/:: :•":'::::''.''.•,:::-'''.'•:•••'':.:::'1';'‘"V:.;::::••••'•'•:::.: •::.,,,...,,,r7:4,.,44,,.. ,, ,'.!4!4•4";.4.••1 '1-4'...,P)4,;•••:'... 14-...: .):•••••1;"•-.1,,•'•1"i''..rr;1•:;:' ••:".&: [::::::,: •:::.".••::.4.,"4:f?. 44:•::4,1: 74::::•4,•••:i":.•;?-'••!:"J•:•••,I:'1 ':: •' ::•:',. : . . • -. ;r• 4;'..,• '4.•,: ..."::: . •'i ,. .•'.s••;:','..;'.::;: i•4"• ..•• Jr,s...•.:4,',..•.1.4Qtr,017,41F:4,444;44,,, :,..,11:::,;ti; ,:-.,j,....ii ..,:,...,,;•,7i.,,,..::..v,,-.442....),.?,;-:-. .':,; ...:., i,-,•; „,,..: ;,...., •,. ..• . .. ,,• ,• ::,,,,.,:....,,,,,,,,..;• ri..:.-,.. f,t1, ,,, -,,, ... 1 :':: ',!'-.1i..---,)..:,... •.i.,.' ..:._.....,..,'.2..--, - , •, . , fit t . . ., . .,...,,,i....,,•,,,,„1.,,r,,..-,..,..:_ . ,,,..f....,,,,,,,.:„.,,,„.,:,.,„:..,,,, ,,,..,.... ,..,,.;‘,,,,..6.____. ...,_,„., .,..,'.,,,,,,..,•, ':.,,,„.,,,I,,i..,,,,,t)...,,,,,,,....=; ..A...,,,I, ,,,,,,r,..(.,,,...,.x....,, ,..,,;• , . .,.,.-,...-.„---,y-77,--,—.., . . .i .,. .;,,...„..... ..,41,,i,,„,,,,.-0..„.•.,:,..,,s4,,,,,,..,,,2„.,...,a,:„„.i,xii,...jii,,,,„,„4.1.,, ,,,,,4,,,,, , . : • ; • 4;•. • • • , . • • . • . , •r. 'AEC•• 'i j''':T-k'. .,tr:4..i W:1,1.1.'.. .4 '41'..,'.1.• .4. . '.•'...../.''``:.,' .-.'•a/;•.-es% ..,'.,,, :., .41..; " • .'• ' •- •7i1,1-r.'': x 1--I'I: . r,..,..,'..-A /.1 4.,„1,Ar4,cit._, , ,„. d•,. .,,..„4„,.,,..,.,A, 0,,,_ .. . .. - •ru:: • . • ,,,,,,,.._'. ,.,. ...: , ,..._•..,......, _ .,,,..,--.• ...., _,. ,• . . , ,,....,,,,...*...,r!'.1;%.§.44-1,.•,,,.., 41,,,,...etl••-,.r.,, .2-•',••••'''''.,,'',.. ;•,''•.:?4 C.4,c'tIr .4, mji; 'fir r'• . " '* -1' . ' .0',..:4,e11 ,ii, ttirliT54'''IOL'..'4•::'f,-*%;4k;,144.',. .;.''.....: •1411 i.„. •"',.'0,41 ,4,..41.'443104f4.. .' - '''' '4.;i 4,44 r v v•',-,, '••, ;,,,,•,,• - •,,, .4... • .,••>I. ,;.",,elp.7'",,',7,. ..,..7,,. ..,, .` , 1.,/,;1, .; `1,....;:-..,.,, •:,i% ',..•.,,.. ' .i; -' .," ,.-1,11 ,,,a.,.1...r..1,:,0.. . ,;. •:,. ',. ,.,i ,.,.:",,;1.e.', '. :,,,,.. • 'f',.; .:-.', ',, ''A,',:`'e..;, w i=i --- ;'g.;' V. V.i.1-, !'.it'/i•Ity;•.;,--ii'i,..' ; .. .. .:',:,3•';'•'•-• ' "; ...X..;..:1 r: -•-•,,041c), ';i'''.".=;;Z ".144'.',1' : ;.;•-• ,;•!..:;-•;.,... .: ,'-.,•;:i lorko",-1,".:;--;':P,-.•;.':',.4 .,:-.'•/..;.,:,: , ;: .', :14;i.'"''''.'? '•1.,;(ilt!'f .-.."'V' ?-.4 :A'1:-...•41,:lopii,,,, , : , .. ,,...,q,,,r : '';':•J'''4."';',‘ Ar.,c. • e4#:• ''.,.-•,..-• i..., - '•'',•. .;'si 1.;,.,.; ''II, ‘415„,..,,,‘,:-.,..„..) .10,,,, ii.,'44. -... p';.•Ai•.•.,Li• A„.'4,17' ,'','-'''S'•' pi'4"A'-fi;',•C".•74' •- .C.''' :L-It:.0,ri'•: -'•,. •- '...,A LI' •'''- --Aiilt;ii-f•...1. _If.';',',4400-.47: 'kiVti;,!•'.`•P't.A• .''' '1;:•41:4Z,••;/..',•' '''=A,'.1,-,'..,•1•2,!Ir4,1'.,,. ;•,At „1,e'F,e.,,ti•-,,.r.t,...je,.. •:,.. . ,,,ss,.:,..,•,,.,,, : •..„., ,,i?..,,...A, • .111,1,;,;4„,4„ :,..„,,-., . _....,.......... ..,-.____,..,:;::,,,, ,...-,,.....,,,,L,,4_,..,,t, •••••••,x;;;;,. ...',f•y;,1,,,,4.:•••,ti!!!i.,., .24;{7NAA•`;;'‘, • L,!"7.i..,..c;.L.+, 1::L ;'• - t ...-„,!..-1,,, . ,,,,i,,..1.:', ,,k, .i.j.k.• ,,,.k,j,..:Tig., . , .. ,,, ,, ,., ," ' ,'..„-, ;: ,•;,..,a,,,,.;•;•_!,.7;,71..i....0i.c..,;,,,,,,,,•!.!..;•., _,•,..e10,,„:;t:,..1 .;,-.1.1i,-Air,;•-iti,4?:,4.4 r....,,e,,,,,p,!, •,,,Iip..,3,1,41. •1,NT 4_ ''' •41'• ...'f'!'1,-•'A'r'i-;.•"1. ".,4 .1 , , ' '''*".',Ai!,1;41:•,...2,_1'''••::,1P14:tliit)'; ',';`i''7,-.:;,i",)i„...).;: 4,')(•;4'''tV'',;''''''''7ii'414'f..''liP' Y't7.inC Li,'-''''.1: '*'1'''rr '' ir• t'''..::".-7'' ''I''''•••'' ••' '.0, 4...;,-- '1: ,-.4.'IL'.....;:. ' ;',i•••;,;,•:;1 1 '; ; t;'. ;: ',::•;•'. :, 4 '' :- ';'‘;'..:r'' • : ''• ' ' '. '".,:;:trelct.,,,.....,:;-ii, -,,,,f, ....,,r..)19,;:).....,, -,,,, ' L .,,,..r.,',':,,- -; ,,,;,,t.i...tr' .. ,,1,,,ilt-d*'tkg":h04,1K-1,, 1 •. .- 7 A ,,,i.i!il•'.; 'A' ..4.Ai r.,;'• '''• ''','''''''.';°•:(111••./•'44.:ZiA. '`?''',1,;•'"; . .',`,•.;;11?,,F,,-,";". ,AL'(:'V,,,114,1, ';',,W'••••44...lti;,,;.,•1 ;.:.. ;,,:. ;.,. ; . ,.,.._,,,,;,,,,fr,,., •;• :.,A., . ."7.;: , .,••,,,• ', , „ ,, ;,; ; - ! ;A:".„,,•FiA;..,,,,,,,4;r„k„,,:,;•ml..4'1'.;;;;g.i.,,;,;,..A 141,';',:;'4-.4,,,,,,.,,:-•„.,..„:,,liti•••• 3‘.....,,,,,,,,, ,,,,i,,,,.i.. ,rr,.7;;'!,',;;;„;,','!':„.t,';,3.','"'AA.%..1,',..ti.,",-.4 41:1"..':A.,It.r„.••••,;et,..,i7•1; 41.0'i.",.,;.,/,'''''''1,''', • ,'',j),' -fr '•, .'•i'-f.. .,.'''.'_, • - '• -:' . ..., ": 4---•-1.•,,,,A,...,":.,1;- i •. •-,., , ..' .,15 .s •..,.,-,- .•-1.',..„.• ,,:•.1; .,... ...,.1.4,..,s,„s,"ti,..,3.L..•.!...,4,...r.....i.. .....,,„ ;:,z,44S+,.•.,tf,..'-;*!..tr,3,..?-• ,..f.K.'..1•.i,f.,',4fi i,..,,,-!,,,:: .11;i:.-.•flyorz.,..i,.....„-•,1'11 •...•.;;, ,..'.'1';-''"Ilt,-?'..-:,,i...%„..-...),..lit),.;,.. ",) .10,4;,..'1--.%...'.7.,., .!•/ ‘'i.:'Yr:.., '401.'....-''.31 4,.. -.,,','.,...-q'i.7;';..,. 41', •••••...r...... ,-,,i-,p,,,r1,...,.4, -..;.141,,!,..-{,...... •.,.,..;,,,, , qt,,,,-, ' TP"it ,I. ' •. .._.AZ.''!.'`.. '.'. . •-4 :, ,,. . ,. , y ,,, . ... - ,hlii!'44", '.'.'.:..t1;:, 1 i 4,t'P'•." ' :cirsq;;-''','Il•, l e •'141 f ..- '.'. ‘Itir:,,,-'44-.. . '.' : .....',. ,ijo''. , '11.14' `4'...t.:' .' ' t ,7-' -.:'• ' • .' ' •. •' ' ••••e f-it'i..."-r0,:ler'it ;4:1'14,-:: -i,' '.iri,j''..•.,'.;;;","1.-421:1i'',:,':kri,Itlfi. ,',r]i-,,r.:;', ::e,`:1,k.'rt'..,4-:;‘. r r':1 .4.•'''. .' '1,1'r I . '• '-,i'r.'`.-.;.:•.,.',...'' ", ': " . '-.' ' ..,:.1'..1. ...,'. , ,';• ',,, ,r','";;!•-..,:.', .44.;,;„ 4.4-;1,..;',."•,4:,j :-.! ' ,...:‘..,'Ei.',;',:';''':::,;.;:r.'•.,:4,,r1-:14--I- ',....4. rr":4"-r( ,;; ',Iti;r: i''''''• !' . - :',...:-:, r':'" '' •'-''.:'':' `jr•1.: • ,• '::::r: '.2-4';.,4; ! -`,,‘•P.;''';'':' "4-•.; 4:t,r,,iiitif.-.0...e.!4:i s.,,,,,,...,,,`::;7;','''Itit,„•:,'4,/.' ''.;.11';'-'ii,' ;',A7-;-,..."4. "'-'1';'iy./ r•1;.' :.• f;': ',:;i. i-, . ' . ' ';"•;. ' ,'' •'•• -,-'r ':.' ' ',f;:,';- .-9:, •;r:';';', ,' ''•.;r: ,:,,„';',j; '';':.'4,,•;7L-,:•' '''ri.,;7.;..!,. ;'I'.;"."; •••-oif: ;.,;-.''N,':',, • .1 ;‘.I.,..*,.11., ,'''is;;;i.,,";•,...i...•-•;4•,1.•..t,-,..-,,. ...;-. ..1,, ,,,,,,••,' 1 ,..,,„:"•,::.: , : , „,..,,,,,,. :„.., ..,..,,•,,..,,,,„,,•.:.,.,;„:„.„.„..„,,,,„,,,,, ..,,,,•...-t.f:,;.,.. r-,,,ry•;,.„....4;,,;.•',tit'',;.:,-- ;;;••••,!0,, ,i.V....,:141Zt .1,':.,44'!1.•,,,t-iii, ',..,;0;'-•!•,t,', ,,,,...,-!,te,..'',,...•44-...,.:_, ..:,.,;•.:•:,?...„..,:','„.. i!::'-,,,..,•,i:.,,,,, '.•:,4,.1!),4:4•,..I.,:''•'81:`iL..i,,! '„,'`,4AW,:.'f..iAr.:."11-4*-r47. '• ', ':•'\ •,.....Ai:citry•_ ..-,••,:„;•7,;tif...,i ,.,,,...4,4(4,4..4,,,,-,,- . •m,ti'.pe.fit,!,.v.,•,„:4,,,„,;.;-.1...:!....1,.••:•••••,,....,..,.:4:4•,;.,,:::fs,•,.... ... ,,,.,4•,.!:',-'.-3. ,A .A ••. ' ,-,..•'.;:r.;,','.,,'..,:,-,•fr',;:<:!;;•tfr',i-"..i'i-. ','-'' ;%•;:.'4";',:i ! ,-,,,11 t".y.0,,,..4,,,,,,j),,m-,,;•Ittn/i..-•-•-:••• .14.3.,.i.:liA-0,14,!?q i:',,ev. •'1::,,,4q.-..:,..s.,,...0. ....::,'fl-,14.,;i4"r:'4,Ai;14T-... I' , ;,,, -,y1',..,';,-4,',, .; -;14.;),,:' ,-Ot.;$4,0;"!„''':.'i• ,',C.7.:1-;.• i';• :.0';:%! ' "7"'t, 4% ''7,,,Ait;:s' S-ti, ''',4j....;%!',. - ,,,'• p. . , „.•1, 1.41,%. ;,:.ke...„...,..,..,.Y: ,.!!,-',", I , ,,, ,,•••t-,, ,,, , .-4,...A, .,,,., . :'-,r,:i,';:-, • , •`.' •q.'''''r.;',,:., r,,r,t!-,,„„ "y.,:',.';',,,.',:k.,,.,„;., .y „.-.., ,T.'C,•-.3',.;,i...; i,L S.:7.f.14:411'0 gi ,i,k,,, ••••.(•:..?‘••, , ;. • %,- , ,5-, , . ,; , •• ',' , -4 ; , . r;:,,,,,,k.5.4 .•\,... • 1. , .,,, t ,,,,+ ii;,. ...,1, „•„••,;‘•,.,.4,t yt=.,,p.,,t ,.,,,. -,...• gr. ..•,-..•....: •..,. -5. • r-'.+.• • ? ( .. . •, 30,.'.,.'''. ''';',-11i",r''''1'25;-;•4•K'i."': '':2.''2••• ' '''' .'- ''' '''''''''.'''' 1 .•."'::'4 Illt,i''''''lit 0;%1'-'":"• '•.:j Akfi'':'7; •,:';',.‘,,„)ifit4,,,,h-W,/,';:;;,.,-14,4•tr'!:,•,, f 1,',:` ;"%'0'.;"•;,5!..•• •r, '',„;.,. :,"I..1; ,• '''•••'''''' •i ' t>,ii -' ' •'';,,1'','-•,i-'2 yr.4.,•,7-11cf,„:',,,,,s,-,,,'-1,:',4-i,:-41.i.;.-.,a'r•,,,,,• -•::.%. t g;t. ,:t.t.c:.-',•--. ...,',,..i.•.,.(i•,.;it.-.., .lr, , :•.,,,•,,-,,A*;,.:• •• .•c:lit...:. •t?,,.. : •.:•,,,,, ,,,,,•• -.•i" ,• ' •.t •;`,..! • ,....,••••4sP,••.•,:i../- . - ii >• ,i•....1 -,k.-.':N-4.4L-i.lt-,,,,z1 1... - .7.; I,;1,f,,,r,.'• '4•,L,,ziki•-• !:.k.i4,•:''... .,..'1,..' .•?r';‘,f;`1114:;1';'',.;•. ' ' ''''''..1:7.:'' 7:;,: If'-',""..',,. . .',.1'• , li •"'!"1.4.‘' 1. i '• .. ;.k14' .'. 4 ..-..-,..„ Pi I...44 ;VA.‘4.; . •4. ,i , .:, •.„. #.14,1,M,l'.,.k.,"•:k.'..i•,4,i'4',, .r., • :f ,.4,,,_ ,:,.. .,. i,,Vii.. 'Att,.,,,':,f,,t,nti:!.,',...7 ' ''*t:' 'A'7,',2•"!',,ii'VA'Jj;13• ''.- ,' ••' • 's•:', ''"*5•.14;,*.--"'.-Ve'• ' ,I.,'''.3'•.'.4'•?•''.1. . ' ,4. .;'. '.".....•', '..,'•'.I:, • .:;• i., '';'-'„• ..•"•:., ; -;,'..4-4R-k.t4.4;;..;I.1,-,..,..,,'4,..• '-,•:-...'•-•' '9 ;-.4...i.,?:."' :14' F.';i4..e;,`,. 41,41...,,•1,1,,,..74:. ;5; ,;;;•.,• ,:-.....,A, ,,,,,,,....... .„.-,,•,•• .' tAl '-'..':''''':'2' ' ' ,1';'''-''';•:f- -..` -'' ' ' : ' - • .' , •'' , • :'..-,!-:t-';;-3','40,•--V:''•,-,'"..,;7,'.':-.4,4,.....':•,,,-,..t,tt".k:.-:,,, ,f.it.t,.,;tr :Ia...1"T,.;:.t 1,,,•••,...,...;.•,,,,•-•••4„;•••••74,,-i';•-,i..--•:',..„, *7.,14,.;tn•4-4: ,•-''',..e,Y1'.•''.--,.."14;:•'..f.1`,•'.. , .4',„;;'.54' h...,,,f.•1„:q,''...lie;',,,,''.•te i'l 4F ••-':•':'11-"'' l.''''t..;4 '• '''•:: 1 1101.4.,..4(7...‘., l'•:;:;';'41:,ifi',I ,,y.-,'kJ) ;,-,;;.,,•••;._ z.e..: ,, ., , ,, ,. . " ' .,,,,,, - :''..1'.'-4 4, „;,?;•,-,.'-•'', 1, .• : -.., :•:"-;'.;,,'t.2:7,-,,,,t:.',1";?.1r,.-',41 ' Ki,.'-.-;'? .';,'I.i.:;::;.t.:,..-: ; .!.., , „ •. , . . ;,5 1 c3t, , ,,. ,... •,. ..,,., • • ... A...4 1/4-1-ft/ t•7.7' ''!" • -1•' ''•' '' !. . ' • , ' . ':- '• .''' ; 4,.A, ', ,, .A',47',?:1'',„1,1'', ',•‘t,-; .i.„,`,,,•,,', ,', .,''',6;,,:'A).•-''.e,•' ' • '' "i'' ' "7 AAT,'''' ''''''‘1A.''''''. g.qtr''''".''Pit,' , ,, ''‘.,,A7'..',i'',-• 1,!St;,r.,'.'1-t•:•-?-4;''.'''1 i„tti,' ?Y-, '•••••. ''',"' '!''-.4.•:' %.,f;',, '',',34 " ••••,.''A••e,. -.,,..,..i.i.....,•,...,-.. --,•••: - . ,., ..r.i;,•:‘,. .:•:,,;‘,:‘,,,,i.,:t,,,,..,5i.,,,,..:',-.: ....,i 4...-3.,c.k.'.t :-....:,.-,s,..: 44.1...',.,'4 4 k t.-..::iX,''' '. '..t,''i}1,..';',.1) ' A,k ' 1 ' . • • '',:',•:,:,7...,..i tt. „ ,, i•,,(4••'0'.",,:•,- :''',1,1"''.•'1•,rt'i...r.t!•'',"ti''''''•'IS ','44 -' %-'' :;;14t4,1: e 0.-i-,.iii,..1,1r. .,.,..-,,. ., ,„ . ,.,.,,,, ..,„,... .....,,,,,... ,.,.,: ,- .......i..',':,;,!1.!.:'• •kg''-,-,•.• 4!;,31-:;',1; t:',-;:ig-,•••;,•':•• ' , . . '" •' •' ' •`':',;','• ' L ?' •; ';'-' v;;"-3,;.;-:.• ; ••i- ;,,,;;-;',', "ir '`','74,#.'.A.A.•„'", '74' 'y:41,;',,AL A„'tl,„AIL . ' . ' •• - I . . • ' -,, : ff:..1..,1:. .:;',I,P,-,,.. '.,;.. ' 1 I.;'''.:I,, '' s''''.1.1.: ', 1,1 •lji r...0'.....I. I 1 , . . ' , • '' ',' ' : '1,•:- ,, '..' „ .'' •:. , '': • .' ': , ' . : •• ,, 'ii l';,,g, ',1';';'-,... ::,:-;:ii•''..';-] -'' :::::C.'::.••; ••,1,':,‘-Yki4j'iile-'7'•41,1f/gb!;.-40X.'‘,;-:.'14;:%4;.''':.!..:f.4;i4knr..r;"'•-:-.• ''').; ,4,•::r'-•;• ...::;:t., +2"-C.I . ,. 3 t'.-,'1,1.-,,„,.-,'.,,,,....,,.:!'.. ,,-..1,., --..-'-; ,-.!:......,..4-=..r,rAti• . ai A'.. 3,".• '•. .. 41.!1 . . ;-...,..;,',,...t•,-.•, y.:1, ,,l-i,',..1,.t .-,,,,„:--!.'-'.'i-.-.,'1;•..i,'..'iy.',A)1110 ;. :Ili- *i•-,.:ii-,,..4:4.,.,..),.54,r-....,...i.... ..,•,.... • • , -t. ' . • , . • „ , , •'. , „. ,..,,,..1. ..'.-::1:..,..;',..: 'lc' ; •s' 1-f;'•i•i'.4-t.litt:" - '''''''''',,'-`,'••••... ...4'''-^it•'4,..,r.,.•1:,••'cl' . '''f•••,• .._- - --- '' ' . , ,• , .•;,,,,‘,....,.1 t 1 - • ,- .,... • ,,,:•:•,`...; , ,..,,. ..•: ..."..,'..:.•..i.:'.4'.'Qjs.":,, 1):',,,,c;• . ..• 'i -: , . .., , ,.7::.,,,',..•.:.f.„,!\ . ,,,,,,, •,,,..1:-'In A,4 ..,,, , , !jiii,*•,'...',7•}?ii,I..„4•;•,,itt??....4, je,i‘;•1,,":. ' .•..,..• , •-• , - " ''' ' . •,',),r,) :'•'•‘--:- ' .1 Cs' 'I. '' :' .1 .I' I '• .:r ., , , ! , "ii,I.:,,.' ' ',, _•,,-.''''''-'.,4;'.',4,..:,,!...s.':,1,1::, ..::::',.:,':,"tii.ili,:1:4C1..,4i;4 , ,11.! •' f:''-' . t•-'!.;tititv', ‘•i•-•-r'..-:":''''.: ..."11',..71.:, . . , - .. •. •. •:' ,-:,,,th.-1••• ..‘t.,• • -1.-' ::,It';;•'..41,11; .- . - .- .,. -:. .fe,t. . ,,-.41,4 .4„,.,„,4„: '••,-14...4.t..' •--34-.',--•• . ,',•3 qr,-,. t! ' t •• •,;•-: ••,2 qt."....,.-,,. . 1 ;1,.. .• :t,.1 3, ,.„ .•. . •• ‘• 3..1; .4.4 ..g •,---.., t . , •.. ,;• .t,..,."•••-t-'; .:, , ., -.•., ••,,....e,",; :.-.4' t,.•-, ,k.-k:r....,,,-;..*-•,;:.,..'",-,,,x',. ;',,I.,•11.,..,..?,...••i-::••r01, • . - ; . :,......;,..,t.- :•vt, . ‘ ....-- I• ,'1,...z.,-,.;,..I:A. rte ,tfa",,,ifi'AAkt.'-i'Vrt,,r4;t„,''Q.,','N,..-N`, ''''',,, • lc) Aur , • . ,! . •!L. ',•"„A'.; - ,11, . •• ';';:r; 11 ';';;,!' ti;,,,k_Aai;.,',!,,;4.;. ,,,,,i:AA;71a,...,4.p.;;.;;,t,......,,,,-:.t,ii,.141.te. ,t1;,,- 1,4 , ,..• -,••• - .:4• .,,-;. , - '4 I,-7' fl ,•;...,,V.,,V,,,t1(, .{:;..4i1;•:••;;F:tk•,?!#•;,''i,10,:,.,20A,...yry„.‘,,.,• ,:.!!,-.,:,, ,(':;-, c c_- ..'c'D' . . - •, -..- .--,e., , "i 1 . :-,,..•,-v •.-t..."„. 4,..,?,-1,•1.1: „4-...., .,,ti.,.•g;i-..,-.; '--v.: s''..'i•ri', ''.. ''' ',/.(4 •'. , C.),'7.: 'r"C".r) B-U1 ' ,: ' ' ,''''..; .....::-ri''..1'.•.'''''.7.4. •'' '::: . . ,',•l'i 1:1::''.,-.:. .t..,,,',:',.3,fl!?,.LI,',Cil:;!'.,',.':'.:•'.?*. 7j.?-4-;1'A....;';:•1'; 9'''''.: 4!,,I;7:'1:....t. ',F1.+1*.'' P.r ":.--:•-•.••/•-' ."..' .'• '''!4-.'-.+14;••'"":"•--.1' 'A' f k• ' ',;(4;','Y'i';'•4;•''''•-•'-.';':' '.'.••1•.0"'•k ' 1 , . ., . . us (72 5,r)... : , ... .. . . . ., , ;; ;,.,.,‘,..., . , .,,..,, . ,.,1, t,..,,,,,, „ . ,.;,J,t.!,....,1,..i!,' ,.. ,1;if.l.f• ',.•4' A,.'01" . ',',,7.'.Ac •'! •''-, ,I.,0_,"aj;I., -•• ' 4',. • AI,' '.,.' ;''''; ';',4'..A.,'1,3.'''... '' k: 'A 4, •ti.til:-;',1,.i. •.p.3.:fl•',ord•...'; -• ,- — 34.1, .— •: .''"1„•••• - ', : .''' -- ,34i:, .,',,- • r.- ,.,." •- ,-,...0,, .., ,.,,. ,..ip.;1,2 'I ','ft' ...' '' . , , ''' '''''L.) 't'''' • ''"'1,'' '' '''W 1".'' •''4.' ' d, " 4 • l'':ii....•-•';-•:' ' ' ' Ay.,...• ' . 4\:•:fly! ITN' '' • - al cf:, . • ,J., ; • ,- r, „..,,'4,•..• -,'..1-411.--:-;.',•.. ,c-' -,...•• .,•,, )';'''Pri:•••,' •1 to ..,4,V-•r‘).,' -4`.1'‹, • ... ,..f.'c; 4' /..:-:)•11q Ill '' - ' 1'. • '••• '''''". s'r-•l'''•'''' "P" -'' .K ,:tiik41.(4;" ',l'4i1• t .-.: tt,,sy,; ... • • '2- . :::''. (*I L- ' • 1 ' fr) •.-• 21:7'''' 44„....:'' -------L ---• -7-‘,,•;‘,it'S.:•,•:('''O''Ajp :'' '',. r 44Yi.ii 'if;•'•-'4 .,1 4•••'''.!‘4- Nis2 .;,,•6 ,.' FA AL!V!,fla •-• ,f ,• •1.1,'',„ -t.',•••74.; ,.'';:ill•',.1•,: ,p;:;e,l'„;;JYtiit..t LE;••••1.,,,...V.'14;";?•., JIS.72-.;‘,,,,,C;';?..:,t,-•;.• ,•'.•,),,• . ,..,. " . ui .-.!--,-,,,. .n:: ,..4.,,12,4 tn .,•-,•,.-....".,,,•,.. ,.., r,,,c,..:0,..,,,,,,14..tv:, v, 4:.•-1.,,,•••F,-. .1,00..iii.t.,,,,j„)..., ..,.;4. '''.':!•,:4•'21; .--r• .! ' fir''.''''••, •'•"" .' 41:-iS CI) 't'11,4),41' ..'"; -.I c-). - .',.'• • hie*,,.',4,4;,:;':',',,r•:,,'• :'; •; ; u • , ,.A";;I•i'44,,,,;14/1-Fi';',•.•'4. 11••••,„1 tvw4„' '''',.;,,,,,.-..;•31/,•'..-,1.:' II, •, .:::,,,,,,oi;rs'4, ,,19ffs.,•;•,..I)''• .„, -,41.6',_ I.j',...:.e. ..i'''''',`,21._,v i.1',. . . / „r'14'',1..i.',.,1 ;- a. -. . ;.,i,,:,•.:',. -.,.•• •:` ',I • . '1..;11:‘'.4...1'f,1411ii 1 i'.q. ','irr"'•1' 'l' .'977' '''',',1e)n' . /... ••-•- • ::"...i..1.. '.1' 'i.,'. ' ' •.1 •.. `I.' ' %..,;.j.'''i. '.:,e.'.k7' i > :''-'' .:2','. '''.' l'''.l';''':.?.!',i.'jilkl. r'iti;r....1.'fr.;e''' ,i“,t......,•!:"..;. t..'' .i,: .1: ,5' 1. i' .0;z3i;••,r, „,- 1.'• .'''',, .I.f.-•• •-ri, 1;.-,"'-1-'',.: , :. , :,./.',..',...;-4?1,4'..•q 3,,, •••p-it,, Ti.,"„:,,4...,41; fek.i.JJ. ,; •. tr* E._ c...., c•--, .., •'; -^.,•-•.-;:,,,-,-;' ,..,.. .,::*e.''' . ,.,..‘i;,'-j:':.f.;';,•'1.."-7,:,4'.. .- 1 4e1 -.1 • ‘.I .-• . •*•1 • -14,-,lit,,,•*•-I. a, '••• - 'r-1,•,itliz.,•414,.,:,,T.-0,,Ii.t,•IL.; ",.,:,-it,,,.,,,,,,...4'.,,N.. ... 1 '' ';'••••:14'''.1)..."•-eig,i'441ki,..4.•,,,,4,tt.;fm..-; 2q14:•.;'4'1°1-•-•'''.4 • •'•" ' . rs; •,, .4.`,,.. , u, t t.iti'.1',..41',If .i IV,''....`ii''C''.4)A'-i",;. ' ''...,:ifer'.4'.'''' - •- : .' .1.! ',-,,:i..),-.1.:.'g,.,ielai,i,r,ri•,,.=.',.;••,•.‘-...,0,._ti--;,,',„:-.to.t. , t -;;:Y. \ ,;,,r.:i';',l'. '..;./;:.•,• •)',i;•-•'.'•:':r '%,.,.,.,-0'i.. . .,•.''',A.';,t:),",:,!• ''..',"*.s,',4,,•' .E r•: ‘••••:''•1‘,.t,',3-14.- ...4;,:tt I.•1;‘. '7,t'k;•;...'•-,,r)1,,,3 ••,0 ,!:..-i,,,z41, 's. ---/ ..,4 4:-.4,1l ,..l•-•,i.4....',..-i, gi;;0.",,‘..! ... ,., .......,:,,11.....•,,...J.', ., ,. :,.,I.i:..;;,..5;c1-i,..,i,r, ,,‘,i...,.!,1,., ..,;,,-...:, •:.:,‘..,..7 ... 7'; ',.,-.4...., • -..._....- -i ':t ' ,,il-Ff-1,.:',!41•AI; .' :i 4•,,..-'•• , V,i 'tq)A,•.) ,•••••',,•',1",:. +-, r..,",1,',„-.'r i.',::I*6.tf,,i•,,,‘. • ,,,••,..L1'•' .p!•:,..•-t's:,,,,,,....•,''. '1 l'.' ,•••,•,i,,,er.,,,''tit ,-,1,.".t' .. •2.4.41,1,' ', .,•'„:1%.' t.•:ktil.i.ct 7,1'; rn (3 Cl . ,•. ...,,,...",, it... . .. ...k i,t- '413...Y.,•••• :-..- '' ••eifj.ar..1." ' ' ,I. pt,•,,,,, • r1 - ,•••• ':, '4`..,,-;......"•,..;'.'-' ,, ,h." "-Vp•-:,;': .' ',,,' •''1:- '6,127C:;;;:l,.'-'..,:.',.•"I'i`' ''.§ .4.. .:'-..".,;,4 (1)+-t C) •..,,y,..,:ii ittl,:41, :... :;;;INT'.11`..),'•,,iN•ikl:t' ..4•''''.;:t'''.,',H.'4'1','•"e'f",ti--','. ' '...-...1,,-.•• ••• ,i- ..,0 i.,.,,,•‘.? ,..,.t.,.:s.,,- m 0.,.• 'P !:, . •-",r4 r, •,,.'?',•„.;. -1.1(,),•,•,..,i,is, ..!•;-t',;1,i,.•,;•.",,,,Ilti:';,F.....' 'it:4f ..... C 0.` 4 VI4'11./.:4q k''',441):'.e,$.1r..-q11:Cr f 1:'...4.:1,;A4,1i..4.:...'. ....;,::, : i.::',ti...,i,._,.,,..„ ,..,,,lliti,T„I!' : !',,,t.,....i,. 1.,,,,,,'--f:1-,-ottk ,..„-i:i ,..‘„-:;$1...,.. ,j114,,,. r_l.r4 ••,A1 ). • 1'4 -e-,,,r....,,,„:.,,,,-;k1 .7.1,.,....-:•.>A 4!..ki.1 ki. .',1'.•44 .''"i-iir,g;qv.:',,, •,5,1• •P: p.s: ;,.. -..-„,..,....: tc..;.,.4..•3..,„.,.,-.,,,...- , .,,,,,,,c.i. :vl, „,...,..;:ititai' ,il.... 7..t.i.i., ••,,;•••••.3.. $.'..1,"1 z!.4:11....; .?;'li..f',44,- .4-,t-i(.4•7:'::"4 . ro.c 0, '.;i•t•tr. -rt.'.,.•••t,,I., .4..••,';',:. ;•11. :,t-i• •'‘g `• r",,i."1 ,r, ,''' -ti;':'•, , ;1;:, ;''.;',..4' ',!•;',IcA. '',. '1.1,,, '.i. .,,111 -;;;;,,,i1 4.i,# ':i.ti,•;.,.-,t;'„;•*, i'41::',‘. ..... "'"%•'•;..-''''',:itr.:,!1•1"4,1; ] ; ;Pc'', '''':4";."'....'..41...''''1;.c',''.'..,.' .'A, .4,,.tfi&, i,..;.• ,f;',,4.4et.i':,.-,,, ..`''', ;,--..,,„'::-+; ir.t.„,.3..- :,,„r., ei ..1.4?+11!;1:2,•*,,,-;r •'•-!.../T;tiji f•'•:;.;:.44.4A''-:s, ";;;;;4•:,,c '4'!.k• ,•4';'' , • u) u a 'Y l'-";.;4 ati,;'•:,....-,11:1t".-0,-:-,i'iiit,r'•'::cri,,' '•';;t -41;rt•r ; ''; 11'..7`,,4.,.::-4,...;-?..:!•:;::e•-;." :,..*•„,•-,••,••,1',.4,:i.f.,'.•, tf Li 13 C 3 f I-IT:ill,'''till.... c''';',';?y,.'•y,'„.".•••,:14-.•A‘i 41/4. •-• ' t',.; '' '•-%T.'". 0 •r-I qt.k.'•'..4.1.i14••!,•"-",;,'IA T-•',..7.1.-:.14•.'1'1,43,•'...:"ill.',.'r--4 '. :'.••• •''.'''.:V'i,i'' 4' ''''."-.:`,•'•..''':,,i-V!.l'i'l'--'',4411'.i•.1 •tit'iit'.1.7';i4'•'.;b'i•i`,...A!F-•,;4 ,ts. ,'•• ,1;,,,- ',.'," !LA'''oif,,,A,' • ,• A:'' Att,''' 'P A „ ;.!7,‘i L i....:„. 1/) 7 • .;:"1:i-1`4A'rlitilti‘311'41,41.4'0-4,,,J;•::::''.,ii'S,k1 :4:-...'cLf,'•,,,t,3t,'::4':';'',11,,,4!itik''':'",i.r‘li..",f;',:!itit;i',..',:''.,,!4";,.,:•.'' • :1:::,;,V4it.t.7?".:,, ,,,i,..,..r.,?,"1.1,.. . i,,,,,. •.q. • • :., , ,,, , . :-...1, .-:.,:,•,-,,,,:,.. .,,•,J.,,, /...I.: ,.4. •;; trk .4,,:,'• v.,01,,4,d : -...- ....:1-.-4-4.1..;..v --..",,,...,• . ,Y, ;., - 's.1'c,,.•/.0......' '•'•'.'••ir.' ;‘..-4;':•; '' .,-; . .4 •;+'. 1..'•-•: • • •1.. •• ' ,:.'• ..,,;44::.,),(;;:-''';1' 4" ° D , .i.,;.,:::',,,' v.;''',.,,•••411.1",f i•,, ";,,:".":-•!,0.;i'''-';''',,'._''.,,,•,:(i: r'l',L'. , 'I'v''''''''•'7'.•'4 r ''L 1: '1; ...- .1 • 't .'' '' ''l. •... ' . :, 3:44: c) 4,-) >'. 7 1.14,4,. ,:',_.:•. '.. .,•••,' 1 ,•,,,,., A:.,,, :• .: 1, ; .,t 0 • •'•,..Avil i' 0 0 ....„ ;!I'.;," ,?,;,! ..,) ...,,,I.,,,, "'':-.s' 'i., .;'; '..:14'..,..'•'.'t:',. .•. qx it• - 'i • ''-1,-Ii: 4,-1.-'C\I.--1 10 jk• *..';‘ , '•..!".'''+ ,..., r • ' 44-..,•, •..,,,•• ,,, . • 'AA, '. L.,,,:„Ali f; A..,fu v-'r•-I I'• ,-,.: .. 4 , ,"I'b.i?.47.. A 7!'AYE.*,1.24 ItZ•".'''''.''';,•• , 4..,15,,.4ft1.. •,•4,.ii:' 0_)-f-'‘-- 0) '' t - - '..3,24,..• A IA. .l",.-,t...-, •••:-;•c.--.0:•-•-. .- illtt-t,-;$•.;!. : lior), • ..•I ....t,4...'„, t--a.) • , i ., •.,- fi, ‘, A, i,4.t . .1.$..1-4,zA'•1.1';;'i-.4' :,.,ci..."':,.4.••'',.;: • r 4; i. , . ,, ' . .r •-,, ....'•..;, 411.14 ';'.;,,, t,,, ',. ', ••-.:.,: .,:t. ',-:.40, Aft), 'tre'','^- 4(',Iin'il.--;;' 'T'i'-,'.f i',;::4;,; ; ; •• ',1,.;'1.-,,,$*,,...,,,: ,,,,,. F.0:1'4.1-1...,'; • - •,,.;•.:',-; ..; • •'''': 'I. '• I:: Of4;1.4.1:i ,i••.•-Ai- •••=1 -ct•gt$..,' . • . . .. .,i, ,r; .„..-•-..• :J. ' ., •.?..1,',„' 'X:' ^i-4',..:.....,:et.'l'.I..,.' '''S ' '10,••••"-, . ,..,... : , • . .. ., • . . • , . ...• 0 p ),..,,1::.';'- . . ...: . . '.. ., 'AA -. `' ...t ifi' •,'..,g,'Ir.1:11•1'....b..-''...- ' -.''' .:,-;ib,...i' --. ..Ft .,, ••• ,. ••••• ' ,...•,,!,,•,,k-_,.;,, ,,, 4.,••:-fl...... tid,,it:'• —.•--k••••••••?..1),. . ' ts ••••••'•.•;,-: .. . ..t ••• •v`-'1',..:'•440-. •.,,,.: •... .c,..;,.::".,'it',••• '.,,, ,..• .1..,,-... v kt, .:.,..47 ..3:., ' • ., ; At- , ••.1 t..- :„.• ,d•.,,:•;Jr...,,;;;;',,-;‘,,:,,..4,,-.:3,,, ',1 -;: -- .....A-1:., :.,-;;.' • -4't•114)•-• 'i'i :.E. t f •''.' .-::'•, I.,1" ,„. ::.• . • I • , ..w..-•_ ••: •- ; 1.-.-".. 'fittil'',4 •0•,',1..'" .:•• .'•,. ,-•,,,,,..- -;›,,,, ..i,,,4 ...., . • ;• ,)11,4, 'I.-.,•h. ' • ''',......! '...', , !.,:' • ...'.t. i'",,.4.EL.1,,','1•,.!:•'-ro" ' , ;, .• .`'•.':,,l '''.1,34 . .S'' !.;,;,,, 1•:'„. •1F-.1, '.:1P,i'n,,It"-, ,•1. 1 ' ,..1 ,3-',44-4,,,: ri,.... ri:,,':i:' v .,1 i.;'..''). :41'4 34". • ''''' 'C""tr#41''"-r-' ';'.-..t,ft•„.`,:ki,,,s•q,. k , . i.4 • • 41. 4 "' Ak• '... ri• ', ''A •A‘i, ,• ', ';44r4.1,i,. ,-. 4.-..ii ,•..-. ,..,...-.-',iRtAt..,ti'' .: . , t..,,,' ..•;,..,,, ,,...,.,A01,,,4-..L,4,,,. ,,,.- ,-..,:k,..;,:i%.' .:. ::'4.:30t.., . '''-;!. --:• .'',.. ..Tii,4gR'f,„ k.,-,....'i'...;,: I 'I'P'..• ..:-.)Y..4 •• ,?2,-,;$4,',.-4., , ,t?j, 14`11%411.;.,•••.:-'ifi.44.1,..'" 44......1.)-..• . . ' ' ' •„, •,- • •• ',: • •'-';•': .: •• • _. •. . . . A • , ' .. ..tt 7 ,:,,,,'ty...,'s,,,k.1•.:,,7,,,,,,,•.-',,.•.;.,:.1,, , .;..-•,,.... '. - '.e5.,l.•;•l'''. •,,g'.•i,!:,:;4,*' ,,•,',;;;' •:..•.4•"!:..;1;I,i.;A,A-,.;A,;-6•17,1.''•''.'-).•t'...'t..';;;'.,1:.-c••., ,•. :•,,,,.•,:,..-....;: .:.3.1;. y• r: „t.,,t,,•.;.;;.I.,;,;;;,,/,...,',,,,,,i..it.:•,,i'fii.rri-ifv, , f".':;•,,,4-- `-i44.‘1';',;''• •..1:z`...f•;;;'. • 'Y-.,..•k'_•;•-,• ...1'•'f ,, •‘...',-.1; 34 ''••••,',''1A.4 ;:=,„;:•:";‘,.14, , .'.,...A.;-A;„ ,, 14,0; ' . '!•li•A, , ' L..4.AA•g l'`, l'rif 0.,..:);.; •-•.-` -•,-- -i-"1, 't • t - -•".10.-,••••••t,;., go,. v:,0'..';', : ; ''..F:',.1.„,*•di,: . • ::-..-;:,r;'-.',:, '•':',i"---r ' :114:.',,..4','V.;•„; ..,;4'.-t•'.,;,.-,;,-,,';ilt. ;, -„ ii!". ...%.t.',,,,.1,4.;4,- . ,:1,?iiii; t„ .i...f.t..., ,...-,:ts;:t:4;:._1. .,7,;.'• t.';".4`,,C.,4',.'•'', '':. ' .-,t4•;•44'. 4 ;11;;;.74-4-:.::''''Or " :,'4'0':,' ;'1•'• ,:•.;4:•"1....:11'i !. • •' • '• • . -" •:. ' ''4. . : ; • ,:,,,,,,,T.„,,., :,,,,,,,',,,,-..,i, .41-.4p..;,,,,,,,,.,=:,,..,:,;,„.;f:?;,..,;.,,,,,t, t,r.,, ••1 .)- ',4,T,'!".',4' *14.',,,ill 1,', • '','„'A i'41'.''''. .: .i' 'v. N'.°•:-', . .; : - .:' .. - .- : '' . ,'.:' ‘;:`.-;:i',,.....:,.,. ,':., ..,: 4 n446-f.:, ,j,',.44 e ','"'iv;:.1.,'..y,p;',.:,.k,-.1.4,4i. ,,'.1".. ..,,-..'5',', t'.,•.,10,,,,.„ r.,, -.:,..,,•,. -„ , .. , . i,0 ,-•Ti 4';, 1:1-,,,,,:"..1!,,• ' :••:..!• ,! ;(•,;S•A',74541, , -, .7it'Ar,',AP 1, .,,',•.-:$4,0--•.: . 1,..i',. ; • l'. .r.'''''''s. 'i':: tt ' ' Itir,t'l',i.7., -:':::"..,,.4'...0.-;ii.L,,4'it:'1 .44,,,,IS.,,'4,_,A.N.ili•44'4."'1,i1,i,r'g' „ .;i'-'t.ir A '• •. . .-r!, , ' , , , , , ' . . . i'•..,4, -';." '.;s;'''''-.,• ,•, !ti.'.t.''.1.N1' ''.,.-'.'',. .',..:710:til'i,A tr'44,1'1,Vgir '''''',Wkl,..t.'....-ii.-,. .4,1t..' , ''I.,,.' ,,:r:.!:,1;;:s;::::' .., •,.4'., i ', .., ,.. i;..' '::: ,I. i. . . ..:...'''. •r'..:.,r..I. ...:.-,,Ctik r,• •:,,,,;:l fr.:'':,.' .4••'1.•;;,,.si' . 1,4•,,,,,,•,i, If e,,,,:te K,•:.i`';'4,44.-",t';',i.,,,,+.1-,;.•„? • ,;,-, ',14' •i,i, : ' ; ' -.J.',.1' Y..':11.14":441. •• '.5' 1"'., ',i,4,•..,;4;2••,it' '':;',..'444;1,t '-•;4';-:. :44,''' -;.;f.D.0'4.1, 1, , , 4: :i ''. • . .4 t;,,:.--k.,-;44.,?.':,,i'42.'1,.14 i. .)1.''..S'"tf,.!,!:'11.';',1'„V‘..tt'p-itj.,••,!..':',",'.•,-,•"1.:',-,''.. •.., (..i• • '' 1.1;..,,,,„;i4141;' '0'; ,:,,„..“,,;,.:,,,,f,,'•,•••.,t't'•••:'.„ '',•••,,, -''' ,'....-,• ,',.-..• ' ,,., • A • •••,,,4114 -,,UVAti•tr.,'::,•';',."•''',;, 1.}'.%I.' ,!0_,•,'!).i,14f1 i,..1., 1;'t' . . .. , , .-','.,: ,..:.::."+7.,:‘1,,yi.,. • ..-.Si,i ! ,.' .,• .'%."r,)•,!..; ,, i-. ..A-A-, f ' ,7A!'44LiV,A.A. 74:7.:), , --i ,"‘7,1;, ,,, t,,-01. ,,_ L A"' ' '1:• 'A ••,,!„.1- ,...:,,,t, , ..„,„.,, ,,,.,,...,,, ., , .,, . ,,.. .. ..,,.,....- ",r-.. '•,'1! - 5 '' r4.',','•di.' •'-;; ' f.'.2•' ..fi.A'1,!,i...e,:i ., ,„;...A.A f.,,,Z11•'i 4:-•••• ?•'' • : • •.- -. • "''''''-_-r‘th•i•-.-wf...;"'••• l• - :-.• •.' ';•.:•••••,,t'r„.,•'•'•-•... .;-.-';(3v.,13;-.)t.-':•i,;`,''. .;,',••!'i> ,, 4,?•ar • cq..:.-..:311!;_t;,r,4t.:. ••,..• - .; • . .• ,;... ;•;..id-,--.'•,,,,..;044,‘•,•••" ;;,• ••r,t'i....;,,..., 4..,-• - 3,:,-..,-, , ,1' ', • ,.1, '' • • • :. ' •'I '. ''' ''' '' i - •; A , , •!,;' ''' •A „,"'„'Q•••4-'LA--i,'..1^•:-; 'r,'I. ' - ; '',.;..:!, 1-;.;4..,;; :rti*i'2''•; *1•2--..--;1;:i,!..1;•;;.:4.• . 104 1,..0 1 - .itk; 'r'i,14 •:;•-i'l 4;4'.:r;-r..".S''‘OfV..,k-to' •?'tel.',13?;;11'. , .:' ',';,;,,. '1.; ... •I, ;,. ' ••••,.,.;',.•'4;'„, ;;.•,: '','k;"..11, ., . • -'' • •• .,';i t" '''''''r 1.'1.'7 -'• 'A ''' ' 414.q-,:.„4,.. . , ., , ' . . 1 4,^,4'.j4;•-4 -' I,'; .„ •.".., ' •''.....'- ':4'4 ;',4'"' .1'4.14:•ki•Crki.1.4'`-'7.• . ,. , . • • ; 1',..'•• e- • • '. ii.., ••.',-: • -•v., ',4,l''-,,,'.A..'tt .!-••to4,r. .i.i..4.,-,. -,, ,... 1...-1,,•i,- I • , • •,••••.-J•t,tin:v.,.•'• :t, ' •ff.• ', . . ..• ••••1,,ft,•0-.' , •A`I'• '' ., -, ., 4,4.•,,,,, i • •; ,, , , ,,.• ,, , ... . , .• , • •• „, , •,..,-,...,.;. •• r •' . . ' . ,.,,,,' k,,,. ...°'p.•;,,,,:j.,4;10•11i01,:'.1,A...4 ' •• ,,i .:1•,•;.1 , '' • i.'.i''‘t-1;;•.1.1 ;• ' ' '• • ' ;,.. .,:••.•.-',-4.413 3,:•i;-',„0•1,;4:.'S..'4.,,,,.ft...,' ., ..„'AL, . '.,0 .. , . . „ . , • ,1 , . , ' : ' ''.: •'.11 11 ;}' • . . .. . . , 1 / PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON eac- tp C ins APR r 5 G9 i RECENFD \p'\204.Se__. e_ocx-N%v c; rre__ al u � -7 - S 7 % kose.avvr 1aa- Re_ qgr 9 10 (60 (' cyC 9ecoc- el o ►k Q; oec--- C..clrforake Fxrk„ 0-va S CE-c F ; Sf Sir) - - i - . -To -1 . k C +j oic"'(<e -1- - t - ) PLANNING DIVISION \cg\tiq 1 , CITY Of RENTON • , ! . 1 1 . 1 APR - 5 1991 . ' ( 0( .7( R .-.:E8\ceD e Grew- It 1 Ue. N— ro,r\ to -Ls 1 : _19&--c-q6/s ri c ,. .„ ---i.er 0 r) 0,7201 / I i •rti ,s.. kl __,...21. "- ,,:••••," 11.54Y 1 _ : , _ N'i ___ c C,01.C,/€.41A\ Cor o..\\ 46.\ e. ‘, • ' : \(A,Q., 'a\eMCM. , 1_ ---\--\-\l:\-Nk , , LJokc-• S\-\04 '1 _ (A• \Ot.A.i illd 'Ai\Q.. 13-Eci ,..e LAiricrl' .0N\ k.,)\-v_r-.Q. AA\E, t,\ <A,:c -\-Q,-'rorst-- Q\rtg. b ecas4, • r \ \ \ n( k 1 1 \, ,) ( h_ \li CCDM i__ ,i _.k.\-\.°-2_r_e• _C.X,CN:j,crare. 0..T\ca. `i-- LA)pc.4..1 ci u e.. -ro,Kly-,ci 4,.. , , -1:- hinK ._pprl-qn, I v-p- ---;, --- tv e41 .,=---- :3-- ---10---2-i- - e6.-,pe.::4----:--- .------- , ..f--- 10* - ----,-- ' ,-,'-ril,--. 1 . 4.. ...;, ... .., 1 , I • 1 t PLANNING DIVISION . • . CITY OF RENTON • APR - 5 1991 • RECENED Lt - )-Ae bluc_v. . 1.4e,r (;). HOnd 'IL he 0 Jie,7' arbtimc15- _ ha/e_ 7 1/-1 E (--y• • 44 ./ • wo (4' 51-700 .11--40. ke . iThi'l4e> ue•_, '-Her()n,5 - ei _ D (441._ I 1115-; uver-e er,e _ . • _ • _ _ . n C7 (7 i ST- / 12_4-71 ci7) -• . • .. — . PL i,:'''''.''1:' ''!Vi;Si'C'i\i , • rs 1 3,' ' .i-o . ...,. 1 _i TON • 1 1 Q 0 • . , , r 19 . . ', . i . .:,--, , r_. j :• -ft.__ . \ 3 J,.r'nza:,....„L--4, .-2.-.:. ....„...... b . \ 0 T Nn e._ cc ' Cr' . 11 ' n • The • ,..._..Gredi- B I ue. Peron i , . ,...... .....4. i . i nool-ier- - is irripociami to , . . . , . LT Illie)e cceshai , H D I \ , \L A 1, -, \1 n ei LA 1 L e..- 0.6 ma\s \ 3a,,3 , i te) A i'l uicts ct ,SF)T •c.,it I • a rtcl Q-.,:e.,Et 1Li1 13 t!raLS`i 1 . , . . .._. . . . 1 7 Lk/6 woci , i-to t f)-) Tiooliery * .(,...)e„ . 8 .1--d --i-k -t- 1-11 ,re. .,/ t;Oa- . oft- c-ic e: !,:j,-6, -) tActloci roosn. co -.eye- -± dot- - coani-7. . _ i-hem . Hiro bo: d 4. ,. 4 t, 42•Cif4,t1 `S:1:I 1 I 1 C r ' 1 A a 1 -')Q--- b•I'f\d\,0 R em? e, n . .. . , li, te:Ji., I . I g.4 01 t,(fc,,:i ,- . grad C_ct kfia. • 1 r) u._! t oy,%of r3 T -ai,- -:.-,k., P_,,73c0_,-, 7 . . .,.„, ..„, .„...:., ,.,-1 CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF FEIS ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement on March 27, 1991 on the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII (ECF;SA;SM-071-88 & ECF;SA-109-88). ERC will issue a mitigation measures document on the above project based on information from the DEIS and FEIS on April 1990 and March 1991. Description of Proposal: TRACT A The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from one to four stories. These buildings would provide 183,600 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 800 autos. TRACT B The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from three to seven stories. These buildings would provide 286,200 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 500 autos and another 800 stalls would be provided in a three story parking structure. Location of Proposal: The project site is located on Oakesdale Avenue. Type of SEPA Review: Declaration of Significance, SEPA Scoping, Draft EIS, Public hearing on DEIS, Final EIS. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at Development Services, Third Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section APPEAL: Any appeal as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements, pursuant to WAC 197-11-68 must be consolidated with an appeal on the agency's decision on the proposed action. The mitigation document is this agency's decision which may be appealed together with the FEIS. These appeals may be filed with the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, by 5:00 PM, 20 days after the issuance of the mitigation document. PUBLICATION DATE: April 1, 1991 DATE OF DECISION: March 27, 1991 SIGNATURES: r lJ 31„21-1611 Lynn A. uttn nn,Administrator DATE Depa tm nt o Planning/Building/Public Works oh`i E. Webley,Administrator DATE munity Service Department _5-0 7- ?.7 Lee oe r, Fire hief DATE Rentdn Fire Department 1111 CITOOF RENTON "LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator March 27, 1991 Dear Interested Party: This letter is notification that the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), designated as the SEPA responsible official for the City of Renton, issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Black River Corporate Park, Tracts A and B on March 27, 1991. The proponent is applying for a Building Permit, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, a Clearing, Grading and Filling Permit, Site Plan Approval,and a Routine Vegetation Removal Permit. The FEIS augments the Draft EIS by providing additional research and findings, publishing and answering letters received on the Draft, providing additional mitigation, and incorporating by reference a number of documents. These documents, listed below with an asterisk (*), may be viewed at the Renton Public Library, Main Branch, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, 98055. All others are available at the Metro Library, Exchange Building, 821 Second Ave. Seattle,98104-1598. 1974. Auburn Interceptor EIS *1980. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins, EIS and Appendices. Report No. 910/9-80-077 1981. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency- Final EIS on the Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1983. Draft Supplemental EIS for the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report. 1983. Final Supplemental EIS on the Puget Sound Facilities Engineering Report 1983. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle/Draft and Final EISs, Sludge Management Plan. *1984. Final Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternative for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. 1984. Public Comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS on the Renton Effluent Transfer System Alternatives for the Wastewater Management Plan, Lake Washington/Green River Basins. *1985. Draft EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. *1985. Final EIS on the Plan for the Secondary Treatment Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1986. Final Supplemental EIS for Secondary Facilities and Combined Sewer Overflow Control. 1988. Final Supplemental EIS for West Point Secondary Treatment Facilities. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 1111 Black River Corporate Park FEIS Issuance March 27, 1991 Page 2 *1991. Draft Supplemental EIS, Metro Treatment Plant at Renton. Additional copies of the Draft and Final Black River Corporate Park Tract A and B EIS are available at the third floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue, Renton,WA 98055. Each document costs$10.00 plus tax. The City of Renton will not take any official action on this project until the issuance of the Mitigation Document. The Mitigation Document will list the measures necessary to avoid significant adverse impacts on the environment. At the time this document is issued,the official appeal period on the adequacy of the EIS will begin. Under City of Renton Code 4-6-23, an appeal of the FEIS must be made to the Hearing Examiner within twenty (20) days of the date the permit or other approval is issued. The approval, i.e., underlying governmental action, in this case,the mitigation document. Public hearings on the appeal of the FEIS and/or the land use actions are tentatively scheduled for the week of May 13 through May 20, 1991. When places and dates for the hearings are finalized, public notice will be published in the legal notice section of the Valley Daily News. Mary Lynne Myer, of my staff, is available to answer questions on the hearing dates and process. She may be reached at 235-2550. S' ely yours, Donald K. Erickson,AICP. Zoning Administrator CITY OF RENTON NEWS RELEASE NOTICE OF FEIS ISSUANCE Description of Agency Action: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement on March 27, 1991 on the Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII and VIII (ECF;SA;SM-071-88& ECF;SA-109-88). ERC will issue a mitigation measures document on the above project based on information from the DEIS and FEIS on April 1990 and March 1991. Description of Proposal: TRACT A The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from one to four stories. These buildings would provide 183,600 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 800 autos. TRACT B The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from three to seven stories. These buildings would provide 286,200 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 500 autos and another 800 stalls would be provided in a three story parking structure. Location of Proposal: The project site is located on Oakesdale Avenue. Type of SEPA Review: Declaration of Significance, SEPA Scoping, Draft EIS, Public hearing on DEIS, Final EIS. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at Development Services, Third Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section APPEAL: Any appeal as to the adequacy of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements, pursuant to WAC 197- 11-68 must be consolidated with an appeal on the agency's decision on the proposed action. The mitigation document is this agency's decision which may be appealed together with the FEIS. These appeals may be filed with the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, by 5:00 PM, 20 days after the issuance of the mitigation document. 411 • • CI1 ) OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator April 4, 1991 Dear Interested Party: Due to a possible collation problem at the printer's, the FEIS you received may have been incorrectly put together. To reduce any possible confusion this may cause, we are sending corrected copies to you for your further review. We ask that you dispose of the original copy you received. You will kindly note that the new document has a different colored cover. Thank you for your forbearance. Since there has already been time for review,the comment period time will not change on this. ly, 14) Donald K. Erickson,AICP Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 r Q ' CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: March 13, 1991 TO: Environmental Review Committee FROM j6/Donald K. Erickson,AICP, Zoning Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Mary Lynne Myer, Sr. Environmental Piannej"l SUBJECT: Issuance of the Black River Corporate Park EIS • RECOMMENDATION; That the ERC issue the final EIS for the Black River Corporate Park Tract A and B Office Buildings. • Attached you will find a summary of the contents of the EIS. Last week you received copies of the actual Draft and Final EIS's. SEPA REQUIREMENTS The State Environmental Policy Act, as detailed in WAC 197-11-440, EIS contents, states that an EIS shall contain the following: fact sheet, table of contents, summary, alternatives, including the proposed action, and no action, affected environment, significant impacts and mitigation measures. The parts of the affected environmental to be discussed can be determined through the scoping process which shall narrow the scope of every EIS to the probable significant adverse impacts and reasonable alternatives, including mitigation measures. As noted In the SEPA rules, the content of the EIS is determined by the Lead Agency (in this case, the City of Renton) based, In part, on key sections of the SEPA rules, (197-11-402, 408, 430, and 440)together with results of the EIS scoping process. Through a scoping process, the City of Renton determined that the DEIS should include an analysis of the Proposed Action and each alternative's impact on Earth, Air, Water, Plants and Animals, Energy and natural resources, Environmental health, Land and shoreline use, transportation, public services and utilities. The FEIS is meant to supplement the Draft. It contains corrections, additions, and clarifications to subjects not covered in the Draft EIS. It also includes all letters of comment written to the Draft and responses to all comments of substance, as required by WAC 197-11. Please,note that the Final EIS (FEIS) should be reviewed in conjunction with the DEIS. In THE NEXT WEEKS: The EIS for this project identified a number of possible mitigation measures for impacts that were considered to be significant or potentially significant, ( as defined by quantitative measures whenever such measures were found to exist.) Thee measures and others, which the responsible official.(ERC) may determine are warranted to protect the environment will be the subject of a mitigation document to be considered by that body within the next few weeks. 9I n 6I n ICY rJ EIS CONTENTS A.THE PROPOSED ACTION The applicant proposes to develop office buildings and parking on Tracts A and B. On tract A, a 12.07 acre site,three office buildings would be constructed in three phases over a four year period. Phase one Involves the building of an one story building of 23,582 sq. ft and associated parking stalls. Phase 2 could construct an 80,000 sq foot 4 story building with associated parking. Phase 3 would construct a second sister building of 80,000 sq.ft.ft and associated parking. The project,as proposed on Tract A,will include vegetative buffer between the development on the P-1 channel, a biofiltration swale for stormwater, pedestrian areas adjacent to buildings, landscaped surface parking, a total of 791 parking stalls. It would adhere to zoning and shoreline setback requirements and generally conform to the heron guidelines developed as part of the EIS study. On Tract B, a 15.7 acre site, three office buildings and a three story parking structure in three phases would be constructed. Phase 1 involves the building of a four story 71,000 sq. ft. building and parking; Phase 2 a three story, 58,575 sq ft building and parking and Phase 3, a 7 story 156,625 building with a three story parking structure. Other features of the proposed design on Tract B include preservation of the 0.1. acre wetland in the old Black River channel, retention of a majority of the mature cottonwood trees, landscaping and buffering of development from natural areas, and adherence to shoreline and zoning setback requirements and restrictions established for the heron colony. B.ALTERNATIVES Alternatives for both TRACT A and B were discussed within the EIS. See following chart: Alternative A2 Is a no action alternative. SEPA guidelines (WAC 197-11-440) require that a No Action Alternative be evaluated. No action in this case would be leaving the site undeveloped. The applicant does not feel the impetus to develop this portion of the site at this time. A proposal to develop under the current zoning could potentially be presented to the City at some later date by either this owner or another. Until that time, the site would remain undeveloped, trees and shrubs would likely continue to grow on the site. Alternative B2 includes one seven story office building, a four story parking structure and surface parking. This proposal was the original proposal for the site, and through discussions with the city and intervening economic changes, the proposal was modified. The proposed office building is expected to provide 285,000 sq. ft. of office space. Parking will consist of 551 surface stalls and 800 stalls within the proposed parking structure. This alternative retains a majority of the cottonwood trees, landscaping and buffering of development from natural areas, adherence to !II shoreline and zoning setback requirements. (The site plan for this alternative presented in the Draft and Final EIS does not reflect the revised heron guidelines and would need revision to meet these migitation measures). I No action was also considered for Tract B. Under this alternative,the site would not be developed and would be available for use consistent with zoning sometime in the future. I I The draft EIS presented a description of the proposal and alternatives. It provided an analysis of the following elements of the environment: earth, air, water, plants and animals, energy and jl natural resources, environmental health land and shoreline use,transportation, public services and utilities. It suggested mitigation measures. The FEIS reviewed the proposed action, the project III 1 I 'h • natural resources, environmental health land and shoreline use, transportation, public services and utilities. It suggested mitigation measures. The FEIS reviewed the proposed action, the project alternatives, the environmental impacts and mitigation measures. It supplemented the description of the affected environment, significant impacts and mitigation measures, resulting from additional studies conducted between the issuance of the Draft and Final documents. It also included letters of comment and responses to those comments. C. PERMITS REQUIRED Building permit, shoreline substantial development permit, clearing, grading and filling permit, clean water action section 4040 permit D. NATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. Earth Grading will be necessary to establish desired elevations for construction and to achieve elevations above floodplain (15 feet.) A few portions of the site are below that elevation. Vegetation will be removed and the ground surface compacts,then fill will be placed in horizontal lifts. Tract A: The site would be filled with up to 10,000 cubic yards of fill. Elevation changes would be less than five feet. Since it is a previously filled site,this would not represent a significant impact. In addition,the site underwent a soil investigation to identify subsurface materials and to collect soil samples for hazardous material testing. Results of the study showed that priority pollutant concentrations were relative low with the exception of cadmium.Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons exceeded WDOE's proposed cleanup guidelines. The sampling indicated that the TPH contamination was localized, probably the result of a construction vehicle leak. The cadmium and chromium and zinc were shown to be relatively immobile indicating that the contamination would not leach or spread. Construction impacts of loading,transporting, and compacting of this fill will be discussed in the mitigation document.Additional fill will be needed to construct the earthen berms necessary to meet the heron guidelines. The berms will be discussed in the mitigation document, and under SEPA their impacts are not required as a discussion item in the EIS.With mitigation measures, no significant impacts are expected. Tract B: This portion of the site would be filled with approximately 35,800 cubic yards of dirt, not considered a significant impact as the site has already been filled. Construction impacts of the loading, transporting,and compacting of this fill are addressed in the mitigation document. 2. Overall foundations Conventional shallow foundations will be used for Tract A, and impacts will be construction related and of short duration. Activities will include trenching for foundation footings, compact,forming, and concrete placement. Deep foundations for the larger buildings will require piles, either auger cast in place or driven steel piles. Soil conditions are judged to be suitable for building construction.With mitigation measures, no significant adverse impacts are expected. 3.Seismic I ' As determined in studies both for this EIS and the Metro's Renton Treatment Plant EIS,the potential for liquefaction at this site is quite low. The buildings will be designed to withstand ground acceleration based on the 1988 Uniform Building Code. Further calculations should be made to determine the need for battered piles for all pile-supported structures, and can be done at the building permit stage. With mitigation measures, no significant adverse impacts are expected. 4.Air quality The EIS analyzes the CO air quality in the project area and the factors contributing to existing CO concentrations. And it also discusses parking garage air quality issues since motor vehicle emissions produced in the parking garages could affect nearby concentrations of carbon monoxide. Under limited dispersion meteorological conditions, locations within a few hundred feet of a garage may be exposed to pollutant concentrations greater than those inside any single garage level. PSAPCA is the agency responsible for controlling stationary sources of air pollution, and WSDOE is responsible for monitoring CO levels. While no stations are close enough to the study area to be considered representative of CO concentrations, given the current density of land use development, and the existing roadway network, existing violations of the CO standards are considered unlikely in the immediate vicinity of the project area. Mitigation measures suggested in the DEIS and FEIS would address concentration and dispersion for the garage, and transportation mitigation measures are expected to reduce traffic associated with the development.With these measures in place, no significant adverse impacts are expected However,without mitigation, significant adverse impacts can be expected. 5.Water Surface Water Movement/Quantity The primary impacts of the proposed project would result from the increase in impervious surface and the resulting change in runoff volume and timing. Tract A is expected to increase run-off 5 fold and Tract B to triple. Both Tract A and B run-off would be biofiltered and discharged to the P-1 Pond which was created to control stormwater from the Springbrook Creek watershed and tributaries. Due to the large storage capacity of the P-1 pond, no mitigation measures are anticipated for Tract A other than preparation of a drainage plan, and proper sizing of drainage facilities. Mitigation could including improvements to the channel at the north end of Tract B or routing stormwater to avoid potentially sensitive areas. i66 Water Quality/Runoff 19 Water quality of the P-1 Pond, Springbrook Creek and Naches Avenue drainage swale is generally low. Often times the water quality does not meet state Class A water quality standards for dissolved oxygen,fecal coliform and temperature. Because of the poor water quality conditions, the Green/Duwamish Watershed Nonpoint Action Plan recommended that a comprehensive water quality plan for improving water quality in the Black River basin be developed and implemented. The plan is under preparation by consultants for the City of Renton. Impacts from this specific proposal would include construction and operational impacts. Introduction of sediment to surface waters from erosion during construction is most likely the significant water quality impact. After construction,the introduction of contaminants associated with runoff from parking areas and landscaping would be the most likely impact,without mitigation. Mitigation measures would include control of construction related water quality impacts for both Tract in he form of a erosion control plan. Mitigation for operation impacts would be the installation of maintenance of oil/water separator sand vegetated biofiltration swales. Properly designed drainage plans are also required by the City. 6.Terrestrial resources Vegetation The proposed development on Tract A would result in the permanent conversion of 11.6 acres of grass and shrubland to a developed site of impervious surface and landscaped vegetation. Under the proposed development of Tract B, 10.8 acres of scrub black cottonwood, alder, Scot's broom and grass vegetation would be lost. Mitigating measures would include the planting of vegetation as dense buffer along the edge of the P-1 pond and Springbrook Creek and along the P-1 Pond shoreline. The project proposes to ensure the protection of mature cottonwoods on Tract B to provide screening and habitat. A number of other mitigation measures are suggested including increasing the setback distance on Tract B from 400 feet to 600 feet from the heron colony. This will result in the retention of 1.5 additional acres of native vegetation. Loss of habitat is a significant adverse impact which cannot be mitigated. Shorelands/wetlands The site includes the shorelines along the P-1 Pond and along Springbrook Creek. It also includes the 1.1 acre remnants of the old Black River channel and a 0.04 acre isolated wetland located on Tract B and two small isolated depressions of Tract A totalling 0.1 acres. The 0.1 acre wetland would be filled under the proposal as would the 0.04 acre wetland. The 0.1 acre wetland has low functional values.The Black River channel is proposed to be used for biofiltration which would result in a change in the composition of vegetation within the wetland caused by the increase in the amount of water in the system. This would not be considered a significant adverse impact as more wetland plants and a larger wetland would emerge. The mitigating measures suggested include increased buffer zones along the Black River channel, a planting plan for this area, and a drainage plan which incorporates biofiltration swales before discharge into the Black River channel for water quality. The filled wetlands would be mitigated by restoration of a disturbed wetland along the Black River channel.With mitigation measures, no significant adverse impact is expected. Wildlife (excluding the great blue heron) Based on a list of mammals whose ranges include the study area, 36 species of mammals are known to occupy habitat similar to that which occurs in the vicinity of the project area. Six species have been observed. As many as 85 species of birds may occur in the vicinity of the project area, as well as 19 species of reptiles and amphibians although census and live trapping did not produce evidence of this number. , The proposal will eliminate 11.6 acres of mammal and bird habitat and construction and operational use may disrupt other wildlife such as waterfowl and heron in the area. After construction, disrupted waterfowl will probably continue to use the area. Mitigation measures include a number of suggestions including the placement of a screening berm between the buildings and the P-1 Pond, construction materials and colors for the buildings,vegetated buffers, increased setbacks from the P-1 pond. Disruption of wildlife, along with loss of habitat is a significant adverse impact which cannot be fully mitigated. Unique terrestrial resources: Directly north of the site,the cottonwood trees are used extensively by a colony of great blue herons,a monitor species. The nest count ranges from 33 to 40, depending on the observers. The • • _II III colony arrives in approximately late January to begin the mating and brooding season. Most birds leave the nesting site between mid-July and August. It is one of the largest urban colonies in the Puget Sound region. It is likely that outdoor construction on the site will disrupt the breeding cycle. ;I Operational use of the site later is likely to also affect the heron. Mitigation measures are extensively discussed in the document, based on a study performed for this EIS alone. They include setbacks, earthen berms and plantings for screening, building height limitations, hooded windows, construction scheduling and project phasing and monitoring. Unavoidable adverse impacts will include obstacles in the heron flight patterns to and from the colony; occasional disturbance to herons during construction and day to day use of the buildings and parking area. There is no anticipated impact to heron feeding habitat if guidelines and mitigation measures are employed. Potential short term impacts from construction noise and longer term impacts from light and glare, interrupted flight areas, and incidental heron/human interaction. 7. Environmental health Noise Noise fromconstruction and use of the site was analyzed in the EIS. Ambient noise levels on the Yz site are high now due to the proximity of quarrying activities,traffic, airplane flights, and other industrial users in the vicinity. Noise may affect residential areas on the surrounding hills and the wildlife. However,the residential areas are separated from the site by some distance so the noise II generated would not exceed the noise code for the City of Renton. On the other hand,wildlife will probably be disrupted by construction noise and later day to day use of the site. A list of mitigating measures address noise. these include limitations on construction methods,times and activities., compliance with noise ordinance during construction periods.There will be short term significant impacts during construction even with mitigation. Hazardous Waste As mentioned in the soils section of this memo.the site was tested for hazardous waste contamination on Tract A based on comment letters to the DEIS.Two contaminates were present in levels exceeding DOE clean-up standards. Other contaminates were also elevated but no clean- up standards are present for these metals. One area appeared to have a leakage or minor spill from heavy construction equipment stored on the site following the construction of the P-1 pond. The dredge spoils which contain the contaminants are underlain by soils of low permeability,which should reduce the downward migration of the contaminants. Development of the site would cover much of the property with an impermeable asphalt and concrete surface, reducing infiltrating rainfall. The potential for local surface and groundwater quality degradation resulting from these contaminants appears low. No significant impacts are expected with the mitigation measures in place. C. BUILT ENVIRONMENT 1.. Land and Shoreline Use Tract A development would continue the office park development in the area,and would therefore :I not cause a significant impact. Tract B proposal includes a seven story building which is 3 to 4 stories higher than office buildings in the area. The OP zone has no height limit,and construction of this building could therefore set a precedence. Relationship to plans,zoning and shorelines II Tract A would generally be consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan,the Zoning Ordinance,the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance. It is inconsistent with the Shoreline I • Master Program which calls for water dependent commercial uses for the site. However, it is consistent with the zoning. Tract B would be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan's policy of encouraging low-rise structures in the Green River Valley. It is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. It is generally in compliance with the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting ordinance except that the plan shows impervious surfaces of the parking lot within the dripline of a number of the trees that are to be retained. Tract B proposal is generally not in compliance with the SMP emphasis on water depend commercial uses within this area. However,the City of Renton zoning is consistent with the proposal. Significant adverse impact of a seven story building would be mitigated by a reducing the height of the building to not more than five stories.This height is closer to a"mid-rise"concept than the"low rise policy for the area defined in the Green River Valley Plan. 2. Light and glare On Tract A the source of light from automobiles will be of greater significance that from outdoor lighting. Light from the smaller buildings should not be a problem since that light is of a diffuse indirect source rather than a direct beam of light,which are the principal cause of bird collisions with structures. Additionally, night lighting within the buildings should be minimal, restricted to security lighting. On Tract B outdoor lighting will consist of larger directed floodlights as well as parking lights described under Tract A. The larger seven story building will also introduce a mass of lit surface area. Mitigating measures will decrease some of the light and glare impacts. However,the buildings and parking proposed for Tract A and B would result in the increased light from buildings and parking, and glare from automobiles not all of which can be fully mitigated. 3. Historical and cultural resources Extensive surveys and archaeological excavations were conducted in the study area as part of the proposed Earlington Park Project in 1980 and 1981 by the University of Washington. Artifacts were removed from the site and a report on the excavations was prepared by James C. Chatters, project director. In addition, one five acre tract purchased later, on the extreme western part of Tract A was not surveyed. Mitigation measures suggest an archaeological excavation of this area to be done before the construction can proceed. No significant adverse impacts are expected. 4.Traffic Tracts A and B as proposed were included as part of the"Grady Way Corridor Transportation Improvement Study"which was a comprehensive traffic analysis of projected traffic volumes and needed improvements to accommodate those projected volumes in the area. An update of that study showed that the trip generation of 5,800 vehicular trips per day would be 140%less than assigned in the Grady Way Corridor study model. The applicant previously completed mitigation based on the Grady Way corridor study through LID assessments. The applicant should update his transportation management plan and provide incentives for reduction of SOV trips. In creased construction levels of traffic will be a temporary impact. The increase in traffic from the construction and from the development is at levels planned for within and mitigated by previous traffic studies and LID projects. No significant adverse impact is expected. 5. Public services and utilities Parks and Other Recreational Facilities The site is presently used for passive recreational activities including bird watching and lunchtime relaxation. The nearest park is Fort Dent in Tukwila, immediately west of the site. However, access to the park is limited due to the intervening Green River. The closest parks to the site are Earlington to the north, Philip Arnold to the northeast,Teesdale to the east, and Oakesdale to the south. The applicant will provide horseshoe courts and a trail system with exercise stations and a trail around the shorelines allowing pedestrian viewing of the wildlife from screened areas. No significant adverse impacts are expected, however, an incremental increase in the use of City park facilities as a result of the project is expected. 6. Cumulative Impacts The conversion of this undeveloped site will continue the development of the office park uses found in the proximity. When this parcel is developed,the only remaining natural parcel is the area north of the P-1 Pond and south of the Burlington Northern Tracks. Soil disturbance through the area including this project will result in deltaic deposits in the P-1 Pond which will require dredging and maintenance. Removal of habitat on this site continues the general habitat loss as the area continues to develop. Some incremental loss of wetlands is expected to occur as not all wetlands can or will be replaced.This project will provide wetland replacement so will not add to the incremental loss. Air quality in the region is expected to decline as the population in the Puget Sound region increases. This project will lead to an incremental increase in CO and Ozone. As additional development occurs in the area,the use of the P-1 Pond as a great blue heron nesting site may be adversely affected if sufficient setbacks and buffering are not provided, particularly on the undeveloped area north of the riparian forest and heron colony. Noise levels in the area are likely to increase with continued expansion of travel and rock extraction at the Stoneway Rock quarry, increased air traffic and noise related to office park use in general. Traffic on Oakesdale and SW Seventh Street will increase, however the percentage of increase in traffic volumes from this project will be small. As the area urbanizes with this and other projects, incremental impacts on air,water quality, wildlife habitat and wetlands will continue. City of Renton Environmental Review Committee MEETING NOTICE March 13, 1991 To: Lynn Guttmann, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator John Webley, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: D n Erickson, Secretary Meeting Date: March 13, 1991 Time: 10:00 AM Location: Third Floor Conference Room Agenda attached below. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA March 13, 1991 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 AM TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW Black River FEIS Issuance ECF;SA;SM-071-88 & ECF;SA;109-88 (Mary Lynne Myer: 5586) Phased construction of six office buildings and a parking structure. The project is divided into two tracts. The project is located on Oakesdale Avenue. Bluffs EIS Conditions ECF;R;SA-044-89 (Mary Lynne Myer: 5586) Rezone of 22.6 acre site from R-1 Residential to the R-2 Residential Designation and the construction of 165 unit residential planned unit development (PUD) on a site in the northern portion of the City of Renton. The project site is located between Lake Washington Boulevard North and 1-405, east of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. Puget Dr SE 16" Watermain Extension ECF;RVMP-016-91 (Mary Lynne Myer: 5586) Applicant seeks approval to install a 16" ductile iron pipe for water service. The project is located at Rolling Hills Ave SE and Puget Dr SE. cc: J. Covington, Executive Assistant to the Mayor L. Warren, City Attorney F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner G. Gotti, Fire Marshal J. Hanson, Development Services CrTY OF R` ?{1y RECE 1 MAR 4 - 1991 DEVELOP TENT SERVICES r DIVISION efi JONES&STOKES ASSOCIATES, INC./2820 NORTHUP WAY, SUITE 100/BELLEVUE, WA 98004 206/822-1077 FAX 206/822-1079 March 4, 1991 Ms. Mary Lynne Myer City of Renton Dept. of Planning/Building/Public Works Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue So. Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Final Environmental Impact Statement - Blackriver Corporate Park Dear Mary Lynne: In accordance with our agreement for consulting services, we have completed the necessary tasks and are submitting herewith 148 copies of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Blackriver Corporate Park, Tract A and B office buildings. Later this week I will be sending you Amendment No. 3 to our contract. In that amendment I will include attendance at the hearing examiner hearings as a part of the scope of services. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, aC)-p--- ,Jonathan H. Ives Project Manager JHI:lr Enclosures Architecture and Planning Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc., Royce A..Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 DOS tk February 13, 1991 ccti SUBJ: Blackriver Corporate Park ��� n 1991 Ni et) Site Plan Review Phase VII and VIII, � Tracts A and B Environmental Impact Statement (E. I.S.) Chronological History of Project Blackriver Corporate Park (formerly known as Earlington Park and Valley 405 Business Center) is south of the currently existing detention pond and riparian forest areas, (which are not part of this proposal and were previously known as Blackriver Technological Park) . 1. Property was purchased by First City from the Burlington Northern Railroad in 1979 with part of the property being used as a golf course and zoned G - general . 2. Rezoned to M-P Manufacturing Park by hearing examiner under condition of completion of an Environmental Impact Statement. • July 1980 - Draft E.I.S. published (Earlington Park ) . • February 1981 - Final E. I.S. published (Earlington Park) by City of Renton and R. W. Thorpe and Associates. a. Final E.I.S. included an additional 25 acres of land to total 109.31 acres. • Mitigation Included: a. Right of Access Easement to dump soils excavated in P-1 Channel onto adjacent First City Property granted to City of Renton (completed in two phases) b. Provided temporary access easement to metro facilities through FCE property. c. Dedicated 17.5 acres of property for P-1 Channel and detention basin to City of Renton. d. Dedicated .58, acres of easement for drainage along northern property line of Tract B. e. Dedicated 9.51 acres for 0akesdale LID, SW 7th, Powell and Naches to_ City of Renton for roads. f. 0akesdale SW 7th and Naches LID participation of First City is projected at over 3 million dollars. Chronological History Page 2 g. Traffic analysis provided by Transpo Group, December 1980 to City of Renton h. Fill - rights to fill the majority of the old Blackriver Channel on Tract B provided as part of E. I.S. i . Relocation of storm drainage into Naches Avenue per City of Renton Public Works direction (completed) . j. $50,000 archaeological dig conducted by University of Washington and paid for by First City (completed) . 3. Shoreline permits SP-093-81, SP-090-01 issued by the City of Renton for P-1 channel excavation. 4. June 1984 Soil Conservation Service excavated the 17.5 acres dedicated by First City for the channel and detention pond. 5. August 1984 Phase I development 3 - 1 story buildings off Powell Avenue received hearing examiner site approval . Buildings completed. 6. August 1985 Phase II development 1 - 3 story office building off Powell Avenue received hearing examiners site approval . Building completed. 7. August 1985 Traffic Analysis Valley 405 Business Park update of original 1980 Traffic analysis of Earlington Park provided City of Renton by Transpo Group. 8. September 1985 Traffic Analysis Supplement for 1985 update Valley 405 Business Park (Earlington Park) provided City of Renton by Transpo Group. 9. December 1985 Phase III development 4 - 1 story office buildings and Naches Street received hearing examiner site plan approval . Buildings completed. 10. June 1986 Traffic Analysis for Blackriver Technology Park provided City of Renton by Transpo Group - note this property is to the north of the pond and not part of this submittal . 11. October 1986 City of Renton initiated and City Council passed ordinance No. 4020 which changed zoning of all this property from manufacturing park M-P to office park 0-P. 12. September 14, 1987 grade and fill (SP 100-80) permit approved through City Council appeal decision for Tracts A & B. Mitigation limited areas of fill in relation to rookery from non-specific (no building) on property. 13. October 1987 Phase IV A & B, 2 - 3 story office buildings and Phase V 2 - 1 story office received hearing examiner site plan approval . Buildings completed. Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc., Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 Chronological History Page 3 14. May 1987 BCAC Facility submittal for site plan approval (SA-038-87, SM- 006-87), 7 story office facility on Tract A. Application withdrawn. 15. May 1988, Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and S.W. 7th Street LID Completed through by City of Renton. Construction required shoreline permit and occurred during Heron nesting season. 16. August 1988 Phase VII - 7 story office submitted for site plan. approval on Tract B. Declared environmentally significant and scoping process defined issues to be incorporated in E.I.S. for Tracts A & B along P-1 detention pond. 17. September 22, 1989 Phase VIII 2(SSA;SM-071-88) - 1 story buildings on Burlington Northern Property (west side of Tract A) was submitted for site plan approval . Environmental, Review Committee determined project was part of Tract A even through purchased separately from Earlington Park purchase. Submittal was withdrawn and incorporated with Phase VII - seven story submittal currently in E.I.S. process. 18. August 1989, Phase VII seven story concept submittal (SA, SM-071-88) was modified with alternate concepts A & B for Tract A which moved the seven story building off the P-1 pond perimeter in accordance with the City of Renton Environmental consultant and staffs recommendations. 19. October 1989, Phase VIII submittal for Tract A was incorporated with a single one story building and two - 4 story buildings as part of the E.I.S. with Tract A and B, Phase VII schemes; reflected set backs dictated by City of Renton Environmental consultant and staff for the E.I.S. RAB:fvj Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A.Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 • ii Ft 3 I • • "d 3 I ( ttt ' 4),.„ aEarth Consultants Inc. 1!),(10V Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists N • .L Earth Consultants Inc. I • Geotechnical c hnic'al Eng,invers.Geologist.,R Lmvironmft ii Scic mists MAR 3 0 1990 '� May 10, 1983 E-1990 Alterra Corporation P. O. Box 86101 Seattle, Washington 98166 Attention: Mr. Del Bonds Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Study Black River Office Park • Powell Avenue Southwest - Renton, Washington Gentlemen: At your request and within the scope of our proposal dated March 22, 1983 this report presents the results of our Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Study for the subject project. The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface soil conditions and to provide preliminary recommendations for preliminary foundation design 1 and the site preparation for the site development process . Further engineering studies will be required when plans have been finalized and• building locations and grades are established. The scope of our study included test pits, borings, laboratory tests, geotechnical engineering analyses and the preparation of this report. Our study indicates that the site is immediately underlain by fine grained compressible soils. The depth of these soils varied across the site , but in general, they ranged from about five (5) to thirteen ( 13) feet in depth. Beneath the compressible soils was loose to medium dense silts and sands over dense silts and sands with varying amounts of gravel . The static water level measured at the boring locations was approximately two feet below the existing grade in most areas where there was not standing water. Based on our exploration, development of the site as an office/- warehouse complex is feasible. From a geotechnical view, the primary design consideration is the existing fine grained compressible soils. These soils are not suitable for foundation support and will make site preparation difficult, especially during periods of rainy weather. We anticipate significant settlement under fill and build- ing loads . For planning purposes, it may be assumed that office structures and/or lightly loaded office/warehouse structures may be I 1805.136th Place N.E.,Suite 101, Bellevue,Washington 98005 222 E.26th Street, Suite 101,Tacoma,Washington 98411-9998 Bellevue(206)643-3780 Seattle(206)464-1584 FAX(206)746.0860 Tacoma(206)272-6608 S S IAlterra Corporation E-1990 May 10, 1983 Page 2 supported on pile or augercast pier foundations or conventional spread footings bearing on a structural fill mat. For a pile or pier supported foundation, the piles or piers should be extended through the compressible surface soils into the underlying dense silts and sands. Since significant settlement may occur as a result of fill 11 and building loads, a conventional spread footing supported building would require that the building area be preloaded with a surcharge load to compress the soils prior to construction. We suggest that the site be drained using interceptor trenches as soon as possible to drain much of the standing water off the site. Roads should be constructed as soon as possible to allow for settlement prior to paving and placement of utilities. PROJECT DESCRIPTION At the time our study was performed, the site was as shown schematically on the Boring and Test- Pit Location Plan, Plate 1. This is based on a site survey plan by Triad Associates dated April 1, 1983. The project was in the preliminary design stage at the time of our study. -It was our understanding that the study area is to be developed as a light industrial park comprised of office/warehouse structures. Fills on the order of five to ten feet are planned for much of the site to raise the site to a proposed building grade of about Elev. 18 to 20. A large detention pond is to be developed in the western portion of the site. Development plans call for the excavated material to be placed in the study area or disposed of by the developers. If any of the above design criteria change, we should be con- sulted to review the recommendations contained in this report. In any case, it is recommended that Earth Consultants, Inc. be provided the opportunity for a general review of final design. FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Our field exploration was performed from April 1 through April 12, 1983. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling six borings to a maximum depth of forty-nine (49 ) feet below existing grades and excavating twenty-six (26) test pits . The borings were drilled using a truck-mounted drill rig. Continuous flight, hollow stem augers were used to advance and support the boreholes during sampling. The test pits were excavated using a rubber tired backhoe . The locations of the borings and test pits were determined by approximating site features. Elevations of borings are approximately determined by interpolation between plan contours. Therefore, the locations and elevations of the borings and test pits should be considered approximate only. These locations are shown on the Boring and Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 1. Earth Consultants, Inc. Alterra Corporation E-1990 May 10, 1983 Page 3 The field exploration was continuously monitored by a staff engineer from our firm who classified the soils encountered, main- tained a log of each boring and test pit, obtained representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site fea- tures. Observation wells were installed in all of the borings except Boring B-2 so that groundwater levels could be monitored. All samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System which is presented on Plate 2, Legend. Logs of the borings and test pits are presented on Plates 3 through 23. The final logs represent our interpretation of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples . In each boring, Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed at selected intervals in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1586. In addition, a 2. 4 inch I. D. ring sampler and 2.5 inch shelby tube was used to obtain less disturbed soil samples at selected depths. Shear strengths of the soils were measured where practical in the field with a penetrometer. These results are recorded on the boring logs at the appropriate sample depth. Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Visual classifications were supplemented by index tests such as sieve analyses and Atterberg Limits on representative samples . Field unit weight and moisture determinations were performed on undisturbed samples, and moisture contents on all disturbed samples. Results of density and moisture determinations, together with classifications, are shown on the boring logs included in this report. The results of the sieve and hydrometer analyses are illustrated on Plates 24 and 25. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The site is located in Renton, Washington. Irregular in shape, it covers approximately 71 acres. The site is bordered by the Burlington-Northern right-of-way to the north and the Earlington Park development to the south. There is a cover of brush and grass, and a variety of soft wood trees on the site . The Black River flows west along the western portion of the southern property boundary. . Approximately ten (10) to sixteen (16) feet of fills have been placed along the northern margin parallel to the railroad tracks. About four feet of fill has been placed in the western portion in the proposed retention pond area. In addition, some fills appear to have been placed along the southern margin parallel to the Black River. These fills may be spoils from dredging the river. The approximate location of the fills are shown on Plate 1 . • Earth Consultants, Inc. Alterra Corporation E-1990 May 10, 1983 Page 4 At the time of our field exploration, the central area of the site was ponded with standing water. Much of- the water was one to three feet deep, however, in some areas the depths were greater than four feet. Surface water was observed flowing onto the site from two twelve (12) inch drains under the railroad along the northern margin. Subsurface The site is immediately underlain by approximately five (5) to thirteen ( 13) feet of soft to stiff clayey silt. Beneath the clayey silt is loose to medium dense silts to silty sands over dense sands with varying amounts of silts and gravel. The depth at which the dense sands were encountered was about twelve (12) to twenty (20 ) feet below the general site grade (Elev. 0 to -8) . Borings B-1 through B-3 were located over the northern site margin fills and encountered six (6) to twelve (12) feet of fill consisting of clayey silt to silty sand with gravel and varying amounts of debris including wood and concrete. Boring B-6, placed in the proposed retention pond area encountered approximately six feet of sandy silt fill. Test pits in this area encountered three to six feet of fill varying from sandy silt to gravelly silty sand and silty clay. A lens of medium stiff fibrous peat approximately two feet thick was encountered at a depth of four feet in Test Pit TP-3. This was a generalized description of subsurface conditions, more specific descriptions are presented on the boring logs. Observation wells were placed in each boring except Boring B-2. Groundwater was measured in each observation well and is presented on the boring logs. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following sections of this report present detailed recom- mendations for various geotechnical engineering aspects of the project which should be incorporated into the project design and construction. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices for the exclusive use of the Alterra Corporation and their representatives. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Foundations For planning purposes, it can be assumed that the proposed office and office/warehouse structures may be supported on pile or pier foundations or on conventional footing foundations bearing on a structural fill mat. The building loads may be supported on piles or augercast piers extending through the compressible site soils and bearing in the underlying dense sands. Based on the subsurface Earth Consultants, Inc Architecture and Plan--1 • • F Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 February 13, 1991 SUBJ: Blackriver Corporate Park Site Plan Review Phase VII and VIII, Tracts A and B Environmental Impact Statement (E.I.S.) Chronological History of Project f Blackriver Corporate Park (formerly known as Earlington Park and Valley 405 Business Center) is south of the currently existing detention pond and riparian forest areas, (which are not part of this proposal and were previously known as Blackriver Technological Park) . 1. Property was purchased by First City from the Burlington Northern Railroad in 1979 with part of the property being used as a golf course and zoned G - general . 2. Rezoned to M-P Manufacturing Park by hearing examiner under condition of completion of an Environmental Impact Statement. July 1980 - Draft E.I.S. published (Earlington Park ) . February 1981 - Final E.I.S. published (Earlington Park) by City of Renton and R. W. Thorpe and Associates. a. Final E.I.S. included an additional 25 acres of land to total 109.31 acres. Et Mitigation Included: . a. Right of Access Easement to dump soils excavated in P-1 Channel onto adjacent First City Property granted to City of Renton (completed in ,two phases) b. Provided temporary access easement to metro facilities through FCE property. c. Dedicated 17.5 acres :of property for P-1 Channel and detention basin to City of Renton. d. Dedicated .58 acres of easement for drainage along northern property line of Tract B. e. Dedicated 9.51 acres for 0akesdale LID, SW 7th, Powell and Naches to_ City of Renton for roads. f. 0akesdale SW 7th and Naches LID participation of First City is projected at over 3 million dollars. c �D i®h! Alterra Corporation E-1990 May 10, 1983 Page 6 U required if grading operations are performed during wet weather . Ideally, imported fill should consist of a granular material with no more than 5 percent fines, passing the No. 200 sieve. A major excavation for installation of a soil conservation service detention pond is proposed in the western margin of the site . Based on our field exploration, we anticipate that the excavated soils could be used as on-site fill. However, the material is wet and could be difficult to place. These materials can be placed in areas where no buildings or roadways are to be constructed or in building and roadway areas that are to be surcharged, or where the buildings are to be supported on pile foundations . We recommend that if on-site materials are to be used as fill, that it be spaced out over the site so that the thickness in any given area that is to support roads, buildings or utilities, is kept to a minimum. For ease of placement, it may be desirable to place a working pad of off-site granular material on the ground surface prior to placement of on-site materials. - The fill placement and compaction should be observed and tested by a representative of Earth Consultants, Inc. Surface Water Control The subject site contains fine grained soils that will make grading operations difficult during wet weather.. It is important that surface water be controlled. Surface interceptor ditches should be placed along the site perimeter where water may infiltrate. The site should be graded to drain at all times and all loose surfaces 11 sealed at night to prevent the infiltration of rain into the soils. After rainfall, equipment should remain off the soils until they have had a chance to dry sufficiently. Settlements 0 Total settlements are dependent on the final fill and building loads. We anticipate settlements on the order of five inches for. about five feet of fill. Actual settlements will vary across the site depending on the thickness of the fills required to develop building grades and the depth and compressibility of the fine grained soils. We recommend placement of at least twenty (20) settlement markers throughout the site to monitor the progress of the settlement. In addition, this will provide information on the settlement characteristics of the site soils. We anticipate that it will take approximately three months for the settlement to stabilize. Earth Consultants, Inc. If L II FM r I Alterra Corporation E_ 1990 May 10, 1983 Page 7 Additional Services ri —' I il It is recommended that Earth Consultants, Inc. be provided the opportunity for a general review of the - final design and specifica tions in order that earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted and implemented in the design and construction. 1 The analyses and recommendations submitted in this report are rn i based upon the data obtained from the test pits and borings . The nature and extent of variations between test pits and borings may not become evident until construction. If variations then appear evident, Earth Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to reevaluate the ill , recommendations of this report prior to proceeding with the construction. I UIt is also recommended that Earth Consultants, Inc . be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or rec ommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of con- struction. Eli The following plates are included and complete this report: Plate 1 Boring and Test Pit Location Plan Plate 2 Legend III Plates 3 through 23 Boring and Test Pit Logs Plates 24 and 25 Grain Size Analyses 11 We trust the information presented herein is adequate for your I requirements . If you need additional information or clarification, g please call. • I �F. R. FAN-F'�I Respectfully submitted, • • • y M tic�i?% � • EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. • ialit,29 g X* i;s :•••.sea-�r''s,4 P James R. Finley, ,Jr. , P. E. ���4/01AL EIW%0 ro Chief Engineer . JRD/JRF/jg I 1 I I1Earth Consultants, Inc. • •• .,._... , at \,, . . • . • • • • ,. • • • ''"..... ....."'". .. . . . - " • , . • , • • rr , ; ...... .• ., .. . •• . . .. . .. • • • • . . • . . . •. . . . . • • . . • • . • „,,,,,.,,,...„. ..*:•....5.,.........,,.„.„.„,;.14,..;.;*.t.•.,..„...„,..„5..„.„. ;,,,,...„•,-,-,-.,........,,,...4r... 1...?„,.,....---0-74*--._4- ,• 11 ,.......... . •• . ._„.,..:rz;..,.:tgz:;,.q:,,.,;e.i.,,t4..:..:.-t.v.;tfs.,,eo.:5::>.„,..itii.::•t;:;.r;:„..s-•,-z.rr.,:.;:A:;:,,_s::::;.7„vk;;.,...:,i..„,.:.4.;:,.,:;''.,...4,41Lr;..w,_14':,...:::::;.-",„k:s.:!::::,,x:„•••;'•:.,t°.;—:-.1'.:.;L-:.'1,-h,7..,',..::':'.II...:-...i..,r:.;.":"'•.:'..u::J..!;:'':'::::;iv7d-:':'rir3::''':'' • . . . • • • • . • • . .45 • .,,,,,,,,o. ,...::.E::.•g,p4.,:••5-,,,, ,,;04. . .::.. • 4' - --•••4'' - A'"K“ ' • ttt„AV iF :. . . - • , ,••.; ..,,...i 41.... , .• •..•„....,„,..„.„...st.,............„1...„,:1„,„,„.„ .......:0„,,. .„8„....0).41...m.,...›,..„:„.„4........„,,.., ..:,.t.,,... ..,70...z.5fik,ou.*:•41, ...,_, ..... .. 4,...:„. II... • . ., . • . ,,....„....*...,:„„iiiioz4....4.4p,•;,,,...,•w.t4.,,.t:...,......4x.,....1,,. ..4.7.40.,...:4..,. ...,,..E.5f.-..e-i....•:40,,k,:-.,;,.. - -....,,,..1:,-,••-•9t.:,01...i.,,e4R.:&,,,,.1.-Ai••::,,...,:.:;,,i,:.0.x.o....••••.,•:•1:?::•,.:0*4:: ::--.::••••‘ ------- ..,...::o0.:•:::%.4.*:Nooi:',,,wwi,;--5.44i;c-rrgi§i'.::'•w*"''''''':14"1-1:71 ,..":0;,44r>akk%;:if*WW4:;:%4:::...i:IMN::::: :11,.;•.;.:•'• ' %.,*,:.;1404? „..,,:wgwq.. .:,,,:i0ifeit...i,.:•?&M)::K.:•••;,v,-•-**" ,..4,0,...,:::.::::-.. .: .,•,..,•;..t.,,,e,,,,,. .:p.• 4.?.?:....{:.*i.pk::0:::',0•If.:•,;,:::z" • ,-kZ,;.0.,,t1,10,4giti*gi,. gl,.4%i'; 41,,•. ..„40••••••:,•;: :.,„: 4,.15,e.%.':,':1••••'.... .....itiffsc,A.!..i..psgs..::11,j.„ifir:.Ki.....',..i..,Vi.S.i .,:•,. le..V:p4Vi.,,agsf,.6stifea:A,...,,V.SA V ..• ..F.Wri.l'a44..../4,..,Jks':'.44:.;•af,,,lie,V14,4Zs:V I 1-. , ...Q.Ktfs,:...f.,.....,.,%<%:;:p•••%:',WW>je:i"`... ,,-;;;,.',..,...;fpNi.'.5..5,'. V.-7.,,....4r,..,..y.• ,P.:Y/6.../..i,....,..,...,....Z.V.,.,;.,./.x....p.,....6;.,,,;:f6; of".1.....,V;41::,&0.,.:>.!1*....%%.,..§:...,,.....,."4....,...,...e.z..h.;14. ..;',....V.".V;k•t,Ilff.g::;5'....:XWV.nrf.tik..- ...,•:::::"1....,,,,'. .','W.:6•.*:41141,:;;4•RIV B-5 TP-13 6 ...,:......ff•i§ ... :...... .....-„,...i:;;;..„...w3(.1,cp .., ,44,0wIla40Qi..,-4, ir . •••:%:...-1:;.ii,.,SW.g?....<1......4;* 4 '?,°' ...egiffis•gigl.Ateitk-:•- •.4.1 le .-. ..40.,,..5•.'00.0.-.4•05.'.%,;:Wft3...1 ,f,-.':-.,...%::iigUi:::.W.F%-?%'. .e:Vs. '''.i'et'f•k% Ir. ....K4...4.t,A44 r „ .„:.w..„4.1d.,r„•...•,i,.....,m„.si...4.1..,..4.,...........1. .A...........„...,..„;„.,.a.:;.,;,:,.:,...,..n,:....„.„,.g....:,1Z,.....:„.„,.,m..i:.„.%.....0'...i,V. .,„....;....f.;.,.i........W,,....,.:„..,,....:.?n.,.:.„.__.:5.,..t.„.0......,.' *. t,.• iiM4 ...,...... ,. . 4,44 •et../...;:.....4“;',...V.e..Y....,.n,.... . i . ti.:., Tr ,,, \ 4 ....,..„.„,„..........,,a,.......„..,...,..„....; ......„,;,.,.. • •• - .. - ...,.......,„...„.....r...„.„,,,,...,„,„,,.... .„...„.„.„..,...,.. ......,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,...:5,mt,,,,,,,,,,,,,•„,,,,,,f..........„.,,,•..„,.... . ....... .,.::::,..„.„.......,.,..„...„........-...,..,,,te.,,,,,....,,,,ii,:;??,....m..?,,::5.,,,,..,,,......,..• TP 25 .- iii • .„ ..,:.:.:4;....•:.?...,-;.,.;„...,t:...m.vi.4.,.t,:&,....v.-:....-.,. ....„......,.,..g.... .--..,,,..0.e.,,,,,...,-,-;....m.....,.:5,..„..,,.-. .2,,................... . . .,.0::,,,..,. .,?.....4,......,*;.e,....v.v....,„.,4,..4....,i,..........,.........g.........4,..g.). .,,.,...,,,;.,w.,,,w,K...F., .,... „-..,:. ,,,,, 7 If- . ... .,..-4...41.:5:?.:4.0.,-.3tv..f,,,.,.*T:o.o., -..k-i.:zigg...,,,,,f.4.i,....i.v/ ..w.....,.....,A-4,,,;..,,..41, properly 4„,..3;..,, ,..„...,.,..;..i....„.,;(,.4.Az,.,,v.10. -.N.:..,,;-..,o,i..,..;s.".:. . tif...*:-..0iy,....4.1-.....-,-.4 ....". Line te.;,-..-4",%wz•vo..<-0•753timsn.,::...t4,4: •.,::•,. .. ..!,s. ...-:.,...i.,.1§..10.,. .. ,?........ ......,. .:5..x......-..,:,:f,. ...,...17.f.3.1.) .0$. •••••••.:.:Ai.5::isop.i.4.:...:..g ..*.c."....o.....-0'f....OR. .x.i.k:?.5....iil.....;4'.......4.,,,m....:::,..:4..2.... ..4........;...*:•,:i.%.',.'i,J.;.:r.,..-•.) .7.41...,?•,•:01-$;•;•0.31.•,4.•••• ••:-.w.z.;-<-1;;;;.4..,...„i'....,?.......,v:vi.5%.....,,,,,S.. ...A:*:,..4*.t.4.:i..:::•/3•2:05,,,,;:;%:1-;:i‘s.'%';'::14 rZ.,:7,7:.•... ••....,..rc::- ,.... ,...... ,. (i....,."....;:..4.571..:../7- ...., / ....P; ...l'i.1 ki::::i ILI T .,.z,; :.,...:;.0,4,...t.??...30.gwi•44,...,.....!,...„,-:.,...4.,;4:17,:v. ...zz:A.,,is...,.T.i.,...f,:...w.:3:1,„,.41,. .,...,,...,?k.,,,y,..,:o.,-.,:..,4 , . ,...,...r. ''''''':::::;;;.;.-;VF.,;:•`.::::••*•''',,,,ts •::;;......''' .. /..:,..7 ,...4.0%Z."*.•40.4.0:te‘V.ithie.g34V*.vfnek*Z:e,Oft...::W...**itOtat:•-4 ''''' ..e,... 4:•,5,t'4'49:"?'‘k., '''..V.A.:.M.....''W-...'ZX.V'Z::7W.O.,::10€•.es'',''' 5,:''. `:i......iE ....-,Rig&,,,,..*,..4....".004'::N.,. , .'.• ait8,...:y",......40.'44k4.'-'03,,,,i'A1,:.•.P.• ..., :•,......::%:) f.V.-s`' - -..,..z..f.....z-z:-.4,..tin:•,,rs. .r..r:',...---;::a.." -• ..,,,,,,„,...„,..„, .,„„..„„,..„..,,,.4.,,,,.....,. .,,,. 5','..,..:4' .• .....,Y5,„:;4`.'Z5:::f.9%•Pi.-r'6'...54,2.4..0.'`,..,,,,),..14'.4 ';'''''''''..,,„,..5.., ,t". .. ••,‘,:ri:......iliT's.7.::t7,?•,n...1.7, S .:.:,.."....... p • .**4;00;:k3;',....;k:Wige.Onf,:f4f.Sies4•4' :"(:•.'f',.•••••',..4.,3:%.,,,,.‘›Zi.. • ..."Vc,i",::',"1 "'",f',....e....5frk....;,', ,t'e. 1,,,,,..------------\......„.„........63 ....."..... _...::....%..;;i",4:::Z,:.i'..:::::;;.',''' I:1 .'4At:03.','gWW.W.?3'.0".• ':0• 440 '"''';V:V.'4.0kWAr.:7170.I'. 'W;X;i:!Ni'''''5.."%steAg4'. 4c .... .......••• -d'''''V4:''''4,0,f•P$ .....44::::4 . „•'?,.+:541,4;:,•4/.4...,..j.;0/....3:-... ...gttt.....c.:.......,..,k•si..w.....*.Z.5y,Z..,...P......4.3,.g...A.t."..),. ..%,,,:::Z.Z. .....y.' ,....,,$:',/.....•• 4,./.. 4,..., , ....::4::',Z•26:Ws.4.r..‘„,zifen*,:r41;'..f..W. Aft,.?"...,•).`;,;.K.:I.Z:14W40 -315,,...-110 ......:;;•4:;:y.N.:::...i, ...fltg: ,P.'...•4':• • '''''"',4• '$,•e•t.x.,..,ki74::.kS'..*.;•:%:,.&."1.:••••.•%•.•,•.,...,,,,...j..s./..//...../....x.,', „ . ..0.54i.Z....W. ..;;;,.....k.'1...v....•,..$0::::5.:P./..........4,4,:WZ.:.`,Z...,Z.11".2...V.A`ie.?FeW•WO... ..1f...,:: :::.%"t:*.S.i'.:. ' ts '...,..A4.,...* e:•.f?•;.'i ----"------------•----_..__ - , .. 0 0.!,17;.it:':;•4-.•••w:••:•%. .ptg.f.t..:,,.....v..?;-..-.,•0.:•.•••••?..01,:,;•.,•:,.,•-•-•2-..".•••-•-•••••-•-•••••-•14•••-iiii. • ,4:•.,..?.:„...,.........4.,,,,f0 ,...,,,K...va- .„ .. • ii,.....,,;,. ‹....,,... , I • ,....,2,,..,,,,,,.....,...„4,„..„,,,,„:„..........,, . ,....q.,:?:Qi.....kikkk."1.4...N..' - ••••••••:•:,....,;:iv.15:1;:,,p, •-::.•,4 kk,..,,,,.,„,„,--,..--:...„.1,-,,...-:14•,•„.••••;,„ it- ---••••„,,, , ..„... ...,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,...,,,,..,.,•••.„,„, - •..v.w.-,.t•A-•,.;•f.„,,g,,, . ., . ••,. ...,••,..,,.... . ...... .,,__ —— • •••.:4„ -4.,,,,,,,,,A,..., , • .„3,44,5••••,,,..vp-Afin,,,:----. ..____. .....••••.:.._—_•• ___________._._, _. .. .,. ,...,..,, • • •••••,..4„,.. . ,.4.,.---k..-i,-,,,;-;,:••.:;.t.R1,-..ovt.A,,p•-" .--- .• .1..s.%1...,.:...:,...1...t.i.';,.V.:3•%,:.,:t.," 0,..itt;X*13:".*.5K14 . ' • • • . • .A. •• s........--"........----. . '•ze,-.1*',:-.t4gowr'• .• . .• - •. . • F ,..,„4<.:.6.;i,05.1_40R A.,' • • ., V..•-:----* -05F,,0--Go •• .• .• Detention Pond . J---- ..40, .0.... •4 / -''- . / ..• ' ' I . . .....„-- Flood Control . i............ r . . CHAS. MONSTER CO. ROAD . . . • - • , . .. . . • . . IF • • , _ • . r ....0. . . • • . . , : •• �� :a::k•.•I • .,h is:;1r • • • y WS:keiti*•?:. RI tit` :'Sta.‘ r,r<• F...4 iyv (J.IDoo 'F .•yam .0 ��� �S. �^ i'.1. c":ti wt ■e�'� �, "' K.' Gib -- - -- -- '')) • :�r<. ' -$�.. ,.$4,,..4. • -w• 'Lo,, Aproximate Scaler45 ter ,:'° �o,, CO 200 400ft. -, ,,,�a- t]'e��Apv. .l... .i 'ZaW'.vzi,.1%ay y" 0�41 ' . eTP-II .... .v.rmiii, ••.' . LEGEND • .yz'.;:;Y..' WI -1p-12 '),9TP-19 , :,:.. ng TP-15Approximate Boring °� ` = . • Location .,: , .. ..ii 'itrif-t..,..:;,.,....-, s:.a `' '''.. • TP-7 Approximate Test Pit r 1 ■ • TP-14 5. :z�. t' ::::' • • Lion i /: :TP10 TP-18 • Akl. . . .�* '_= ` Approximate Area of • B-4 Fill TP_8 ,;.,..::yam Nu TP-3 � " TP 7 �-P-6 TP-5 TP-4 ■ �::.:; �:L • t -.�� TP-2 TP-1 _ • ¢¢i P l' Reference r . r Conceptual Land Use/Preservation Plan NACHES AVE. S.W. POWELL AVE. S.W. By Richard Carothers Associates Property Line Dated 5/21/82 • i It el'. .p • EARLINGTON PARK Earth T Consultants Inc.ii1�..• if' ) GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & 6EflLOGY r.. , Boring and Test Pit• Location Ran Black River Office- Park • Renton, Washington . - :�,;; Proj.No. 1990 - jDate May '83 jNate I - GRAPH LETTER ICAL DESCRIPTIONS i ' ' MAJOR DI ONS SYMBOL SYMBOL •:"a•0 0• WELL-GRADED MAVCLS, GRAVEL-SAND GRAVEL or At Nisei •Q.•0' O. a GW MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES ANC, CLEAN NAVELS 'a b'�O O GRAVELLY (little eei •i:..::4_ •j•.S. O..• POORLY-GRADED GRAVELS, - SOILS •.•••'• • GP SAND MIXTURES. LITTLE OR NO FINES • s: :!•0::• •" COARSE 1-.1. . • GRAINED 1ii ySOILS •G G M SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SANO- MOR( THAN SO% SILT MIXTURES ■ OF COARSE FRAC- GRAVELS WITH FINES 1 I -r TI ON RETAINED (msw•FRel• ue•wl Si . , �, ON NO.4 SIEVE flees) "///r/)J CLAYEY GRAVELS, GR AVEL•SAND- GC CLAY MIXTURES 0 ° 0a e •- 0 0 WELL-GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY a°00 e° 0 0 e e SW SAND SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES CLEAN SAND AND a : 00 _ °ea O 0 SANDY (Irt tie s, . SOILS POORLY-MAO(D SANDS, GRAVELLY MORE THAN 50% • S P SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES 3 OF MATERIAL IS • .•'f 1: LARGER THAN NO .I . 200 SIEVE SIZE • rr SM SILT? SANDS, SAND-SILT MIXTURE! MORE THAN 50% AC- SANDS W1TN FINES . �•� OF COARSE FRAC• (sppeale►M ...el el r A TION PAS SING flags) / e f f4 y NO. e SIEVE i SC CLAYEY SANDS, SAND-CLAY MIXTURES i INORSANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE LARDS, ROCK FLOWS, SILTY OR ML CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY y SILT; WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY — ® • INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM FINE 'SILTS LIQUID LIMIT �� i+l PLA LITT, SILT GRAVELLY CLAYS, DRAINED AND LESS THAN SO SANDY CLAYS. !SETT CLAYS, LEAN SOILS CLAYS CLAYS 1 i OL ORGANIC SILTS AND OR•ANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY • INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR IIIII MH DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SILTY SOILS MORE THAM Sot SILTS OF MATERIAL IS LIQUID LIMITINORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH `H AND GREATER THAN SO ►LASTICIT Y, FAT CLAYS SMALLER THAN NNO CLAYS 3 200 SIEVE SIZE 1/ � OH ORGANICCLAYS OF MEDIUMTO HIGH ►L•STIGTT, ORGANIC SILTS ' •3 ..�_z _ ( PEAT, MUeAJ1, -•.'NP SOILS .� PI I HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS • i�- l WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS TOPSOIL - - . Humus and Dutf Layer . ***ASS*. • ••••• Uncontrolled with FILL ❖• 4..❖•• Highly Variable Constituents ROTC DUAL SYMSOLS ARC USED TO INDICATE SORDERLIN( SOIL CLASSIIICAT'ONS SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART THE DISCUSSION IN THE TEXT OF THIS REPORT IS NECESSARY FOR A PROPER UNDERSTANDING OF THE NATURE OF THE MATERIAL PRESENTED IN THE ATTACHED LOGS II 2""O.D.Split Spoon Sampler Jj Ring or Shelby Sample P Sampler Pushed Earth # . 10 41. Sample Not Recovered Consultants Inc. s Water Level (date) LEGEND Ts Torvane Reading qu Penetrometer Readings II1111 ll Water Observation Well Proj-No. 1990 IDate Apr. '83 1 Plate 2 BORING NO. iLogged By ' JRD _ + Date 4/6/83 ELEV. 23- Graph CS (N)Soil Description D(fpft.,h Sample Blows -) Ft. o•oo•�•oo - oo�o�o�o�o - • .4,o:o - 12 ♦0000 *0000 ♦0000 — 5 • **�*�*00 ML Dark brown clayey SILT with large pieces - • ♦0000♦• of concrete and some wood, medium stiff, 0000♦ 0000♦ moist (FILL)• —10 *o***o** (See note below) - 0000000 - ^ 29 1 J MH Mottled tan clayey SILT, stiff, damp 0 10 41 qu=1.5 tsf ML —15— LL=52 - 111 PI=18=18 - P 35 qu=1.25tsf 1 —20 I ML Brown sandy SILT to silty SAND, grading - = 5 46 SM to SILT, loose grading to dense at • r,--, about 25' —25 'lLtt}J T}J}}� • 32 53 - —30 i . tiv: SM Gray gravelly SAND with silt to SAND = 41 7 .� SP with silt, dense, wet —35 - T 30 14 , .- - Boring terminated at 39' . 1 - Water observation well installed to 39' . NOTE: Boring was drilled through backfilled test pit excavation after 1 removal of large pieces of concrete. • 1 BORING LOG ii.• BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK l II/ RENTON, WASHINGTON iConsulta .nts Inc .. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1990 I Date Apr. '83 frau 3 • BORING NO. = • Logged By + ; 4/6/83._ ...__...... .. .. ELEV. 19- ' . i Date _- Gra-�•h CS Soil Description Depth Sample Blows t W) �°°°°♦ ... T 4��0�0��� ML Dark brown SILT with sand and gravel, 1 °°i°i°:::8 very soft, damp (FILL) 3 23 I i°o°o°o°o°i - • �4°°o I _ 9 40 q =1.5tsf 1/ MHCL Brown clayey .SILT, stiff, damp 10 • u } I�!II ML (grading to medium dense below 7') - SM Brown silty SAND to SAND with silt, - 15 • SP loose, wet 16 20 ••.... ... • —20 _ __ (grading to sandy SILT below 12') _ — - — - _ :I: 11 22 I. `•.+ silt SAND to SAND with silt, very - 55 16 .;; _.SM__ Brown y ,•.- • , SP- dense;-.wet i,,, ti 3 0 ---- ':•:..: __ . .. . 5 -- ------ -- -- -- - T 50/4"--- 19 I - _... Boring terminated at 38' below existing grade. ' • • t BORING LOG .. • - ki, li ��,r o 1\� BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK . Earth RENTON,. WASHINGTON , • _� - Consultants Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1990 I Date Apr- '83 Iate 4 . . • BORING NO. t Logged By JRD + Date 4/6/83 ELEV. :18- Graph CS Soil Description Depth Sample BlowsN � � _ Ft. . ••o•• - ••,•••,•,• •�•�o�•�•� SM Dark brown silty SAND with gravel, - _ 4 18 I ••o•• ••••♦ •••o•••••• loose, damp (FILL) — 5 Q ••••••••• •••°••••i• -4/19/B 3 • II .. ML Brown sandy SILT to SILT, very loose, _ = 3 37 . . . SM damp }}}}tip.}}}}}}ti —10 30 28 i _15 f _ SM Brown SAND with silt grading to sandy - 19 6 SP GRAVEL with silt and gravelly SAND, 20 II ! i'�:' '�? GP medium dense, wet -- :• . +•'4. ! GM 23 14 :•'::.: �. +_��_4 _..... —25 • 4 ,e,, (grading to silty SAND below 17') - ... • . - I. 11 31 •- .`• —30 i••• 1 - • - :I: •102/6" 18 - - a == ' SS Greenish brown weathered SILTSTONE, hard—35 • -1--7-'-`"` (BEDROCK) - ___ .. - .T 100/4" 27 . Boring terminated at 38' . I Water observation well installed to 38' . - II + . BORING LOG BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK Earth 41;\ k Consultants Inc. ( 'i RENTON, WASHINGTON GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1990 I Date Apr. '83 frate 5 _ . 13 . , , . , • --. BORING NO. 4+ Logged By JRD .1- - -7—Date 4/11/83 ELEV 13-• ._ US Depth (N) W Graph Soil DescriptionSample Blows - CS Ft. _., I - 3 43 - - - ML Brown SILT with clay to SILT, very soft -4/19/33 3 67 g =0.5 to I _ •-MH-- to stiff, damp - _ 5 11 _ — 52 1.25 tsf _ - P 17 — 10 I 12 19 , . . " . I 33 9•1 -e - SM Gray SAND with silt to gravelly SAND — 15 11.1.1...' SP with silt, medium dense to dense, wet - 1 t.::..•:•.•:• :::4:•.::::: - - I 30 12 .............:.•.::. - :.:v.,-...: : — 201 - •••••••...•.• . __ :0.,'.......:: 3 .:.:.:.,....t::.:..::. - . - - :*:*....*•!...*:::.::. "-- - " T 31 7 Boring terminated at 24' . _ 1 - - - -- Water observation well installed to 24' . _ . . • - - . . ..... . _ i - . . _. ._ _ _ . - - _ __ _ . _ _ - ------ - 1 I ' . • • - - • _ - -- -- - - - --- . - 1 1 _.. . -• — . . . BORING LOG . :_ _ ,. 1`; 4 BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK Earth RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultints-InC. '. • / ‘111Y 1 GEOTEHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1990 ' Date APr• '83 'Plate 6 __. ,,,..... _ • BORING NO. _ il _ ..... . I Logged By JRD Date 4/11/83 ELEV. 13- • ' (N) Graph cs Soil Description D(fp h_ Sample Blows (OW) - Ft. 111 MH Brown clayey SILT, very soft grading to _ 0 2 qu.25 tsf ML stiff at 3' , damp 4/19/83 =.75- y 3 1.25tsf — 5 � : 1 _ z P i�� :..`:.L f: —10 .- 1 SM Brown to gray silty SAND to SAND with 18 iiii{iiiil -;!: .�:: SP silt, medium dense, wet - t _ 15 0 •:▪::, :• •••••••• - _ Z 24 :20 • 3 . . • _ 1 3 LL=45,PI=14 ML Gray medium stiff clayey SILT to SILT -25 • with clay and trace of fine sand, pieces - . • - - .of shell, .very loose, wet _ = 3 _30 - ML Gray lenses of sandy SILT, SAND with 5 • 1 "" SM silt, and silty SAND, loose, wet —35 J - flti ,!'1 1 ^ . Lt%. �. 6 40 I , _ • !.... SP Gray silty SAND to SAND with silt, dense Z 33 I ••••..•. V' SM wet — 45 30 Boring terminated at 49' . • Water observation well installed to 49' . 1 1 . (` �� BORING LOG • /{ ( • BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK RENEarth \1 I i ' , WASHINGTON Consultants Inc.\` \. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. r o. 1990 I Date Apr. '83 Ite 7 • BORING NO. 6 Logged By. JRD Date •�/12/83 ELEV. 17- - N) Graph CS Soil Description �eftpjh Sample BlowsW a Ft. (�G) s 0000 -4.,, oioi3 0 ♦0000 o�o������� ML Brown sandy SILT, dense to medium dense, 0000♦ S 000000o damp (FILL) _ 23 000000ioio —5 • - • 1 ML Mottled brown clayey SILT, stiff, damp '4/19/32 = 6 IIIIIIJIIVIH —10 15 •:;•i•: SP Gray SAND with gravel grading to GP gravelly SAND and sandy GRAVEL, medium 15 " • � dense grading dense, wet _ 26 If •: 10: . s.7 =I: 1.25tsf •. . •. . 11. =20 I . • ••• T 39 Boring terminated at 24' . . 11 Water observation well installed to 24 ' . . I I I • 1 . . I • 1 A if fil BORING LOG *77 BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK Ea Consultants Inc. ,- RENTON, WASIiINGTON GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1990 I Date Apr. '83 hate 8 • . .. - TEST- PIT NO. _l.- . Logged By JRD m -- Date- 4/1/83 - Elev. 14- _. Depth W r (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) 0 _ _ 38 q u=0.25 1: - MH Mottled brown clayey SILT, soft to medium stiff, tsf ML damp to wet 5 -- 1 (grading blue gray below 5' ) 38 qu=0.5- - 1.0 tsf I 10 _ Test Pit terminated at 9' due to caving. • Heavy groundwater seepage below about 2' . I _ . • _ . , . • 1... .__L_ .-'--15 . Logged By JRD 14± Date 4/1/83 • TEST PIT NO. _a- Elev. 0 _ LL=bi PI=38 47 _ qu=0.5- g Y clayeySILT, 1.0 tsf MH Mottled brown to blue gray cla e soft to ML stiff, damp to wet - _. _ 1.75 5 — . . _ .. tsf i -:„J . SM Blue gray silty gravelly SAND to silty SAND with 14 ::::.: gravel, medium dense, wet _ 10 — Test Pit terminated at 9' due to caving. _ Heavy groundwater seepage below about 3' . . _. . 15 I - 11�. TEST PIT LOGS JIti. BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK Earth RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultants Inc. • ' 'GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY' Proj. No. 1990 I Date Apr. '83 (Plate 9 1 9 i TEST PIT NO. _ _ 'Logged By JRD 1 Date 4/1/83 Elev. 13± I 1 D(ftt.)h USCS Soil Description (%) 3 1 0 - _! 67 q .25- _ MH Mottled brown clayey SILT, very soft to medium ,5utsf stiff, damp a - ^= - 5tsf 5 — _;-': Pt Brown fibrous PEAT, medium stiff, wet 223fil qu _El r�� . r..t.l : SM Gray silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, wet 42 ti.. r 3 Test Pit terminated at 8' due to caving. 10 -- Heavy groundwater seepage below about 3' . 1 - 15 i JRDLogged B 4/1/83 TEST PIT NO. 4 Elev. 1 �- • Date li 0 • - 37 qu=.5- 3 - ML Mottled blue clayey SILT, soft to medium stiff, 1.0 tsf MH damp 5 — 1 • ~j' 4 SM Gray SAND with silt, medium dense, wet 39 SP 11 Test Pit terminated at 8' due to caving. 10 — Heavy groundwater seepage below 3' . HE 15 . I1''. '. . TEST PIT LOGS 1 BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK Earth • I , RENTON, WASHINGTON = Consultants Inc. • . 1 •GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1990 I Date Apr• '83 IPlate 10 E • 1 • . TEST PIT N O.._--5_ i . . Logged By JRD Date -4/1/83--.... .-. . .. + - Elev. 14- Depth w (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) 1 0 If _ 60 qu=.5- MH Mottled brown clayey SILT, soft to medium stiff, 1.0 tsf ML damp 5 — _ 36 qu=0.7tsf5 I _ Test Pit terminated at 8' due to caving. 10 Moderate to heavy groundwater seepage below 3' . I - - -!--15 - I Logged By JRD - • + • Date 4/1/83 TEST PIT NO. _ _ Elev. 15- [ 0 . MH Brown clayey SILT, soft, damp - q =.Stsf " ' 43 u ; SM Brown silty-SAND, loose, damp - --. . . ... . . • - - '47 - 50- CL Brown silty CLAY to clayey SILT, soft to very 5 -- ML stiff, .wet 56 1.0 tsf SM Blue gray silty SAND, medium dense, wet I rr K., Test Pit terminated at 8.5' due to caving. 22 - - • .. . 10 Heavy groundwater seepage below about 3' . ' • --- -- 15 '1•1,. TEST PIT LOGS • . • ' '!. , BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK - Earth RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultants Inc. ' 'GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1990 I Date Apr. '83 jPlate 11 . .r 1 TEST PIT NO. ____Z__ Logged By JRD , Date 4/1/83 - - - Elev. 13± I 1 Depth W (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) I 0 - .Stsf 1 MH Brown clayey SILT, soft to medium stiff = ML 81 5 — SM Blue gray silty SAND, medium dense, wet 32 ITest Pit terminated at 8.5' due to caving. 10 — Moderate to heavy groundwater seepage below 3 ' . I I15 ILogged By JRD Elev. 15± Date 4/1/83 TEST PIT NO. �_ I 0 - ML Brown clayey SILT to SILT with sand, soft, damp. 41 I - . 1.5 tsf 5 — MH Brown clayey SILT, soft to stiff, wet 96 - (Below 12'-some peat mixed with clayey SILT) 10 SM Gray silty SAND, medium dense, wet l Jll. L tl' I _ Test Pit terminated at 11' . Moderate groundwater seepage below 3' , heavy - seepage at 8' . I . 15 I _ I1 TEST PIT LOGS't i BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK I Earth ' • RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultants Inc. 'I •GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1990 f Date Apr. '83 Ite 12 I TEST PIT NO.Logged Logged By JRD + Date 4/1/83 • Elev. 17_ W Depth (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) 0 - 45 qu=.5tsf i - 5 - - MH Mottled brown to gray clayey SILT, soft to stiff, ML damp _, q u=1.Otsf • 10 --- 51 r Test Pit terminated at 13' . • 15 _ Minor groundwater seepage at 12' . Logged By JRD 17± Date 4/1/83 TEST PIT NO. -L4 Elev. - 3 _ 0 ML Brown SAND with silt-SILT with sand, medium dense, • -=: :k. SM damp 45 ;,,,:r cr - - - :.. • . qu 1-2 tsf 5 MH Gray clayey SILT, stiff, damp _ ML • 59 1 Test Pit terminated at 9' due to caving. 10 — . - Moderate groundwater seepage -below 6' . S. 3. .. . 15 • TEST PIT LOGS i' ( 1 BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK Earth RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultants Inc. ••GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1990 I Date Apr. '83 !Plate 13 L . ' a TEST PIT NO. _.11- I Logged By JRD ��. Date 4/1/83 Elev. 13— Depth w (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) 0 I - il _ 46 q =.5-1 - MH Brown clayey SILT, soft to medium stiff, damp u tsf ML 5 -- 54 El _ Test Pit terminated at 8.5' due to caving. 10 — Light grading to moderate groundwater seepage below 4' ._ El ZI 15 F ¢ Logged By JRD 17+ 4/1/83 � Date TEST PIT NO. _ f2 Elev. 1 0 ,/ CL Brown clayey SILT, soft to stiff, damp _.5- ML q u 1 5 tsf 1 �'/ LL=45 i 5 — PI=13 31 I :: 441 SM Blue gray silty SAND, medium dense, wet ` 10 — Test Pit terminated at 9.5' due to caving. Moderate to heavy groundwater seepage below 4' . I 15 / 1,. TEST PIT LOGS r: BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK Earth ' I RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultants Inc. •GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1990 [Date Apr. '83 JPlate 14 I. i ' . • . • TEST PIT NO. _ Logged By JRD Date 4/1/83 Elev. 13- Depth W (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) g- 0 84 q u=.25- -_, MH 3 _ Brown clayey SILT, soft to medium stiff, damp .5 tsf 5 —I (grading to blue gray at 5') It - 1 38 qu=.75 . tsf - Test Pit terminated at 8' due to caving. 10 -- Heavy groundwater seepage below 2' . 15 Logged %1/8RD TEST PIT NO. 1 E lev. Date 13± 0 ML 3 _ Brown clayey SILT, soft to medium stiff, damp 37 q =.5- - u 5 — l tsf — SM Blue silty SAND, medium dense, wet 30 10 _ Test Pit terminated at 9' due to caving.. Moderate to heavy groundwater seepage below 3' . I - 15 — ITEST PIT LOGS llt ', BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK Earth l RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultants Inc. I•GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Prof. No. 1990 Date Ap I r• '83 Plate 15 I i . • TESTPITNO. _. Logged By JRD Date 4/1/83 _. Elev. 15- IDepth W (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) MH Mottled brown clayey SILT, soft to medium stiff, I ML damp 43 q L'=.5- 5 1 tsf I _ lIIf ML Blue silty SAND to sandy SILT, medium dense, wet 38 1l. SM 10 - Test Pit terminated at 8' due to caving. - Heavy groundwater seepage below 4' . I 15 ILogged By JRD 14- Date 4/1/83 TEST PIT NO. i6 Elev._ 1 0 — I 1 46 qu=.5- 1 tsf 5 — r, i _ = ML Brown clayey SILT, soft to medium stiff, damp - 46 q =.5- 10 lutsf _ Test Pit terminated at 10' due to caving. [ - Heavy groundwater seepage below 4' . 15 ITEST PIT LOGS i BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK - Earth ! 1 RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultants Inc. . •GEOTECI-4NICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1990 I Date Apr. '83 [Plate 16 • TEST PIT NO. Logged By JRD Date 4/1/83 Elev. 17± II Depth W (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) SM Dark brown silty SAND to sandy SILT, medium dense, ML damp (FILL) 26 5 -- ML Gray stiff clayey SILT grading to SILT with sand and sandy SILT, medium dense, wet 43 10 --� Test Pit terminated at 9' due to caving. Heavy groundwater seepage below 3' . 15 Logged B 4/5/83 TEST PIT NO. _IL_ Elev. 13± Date 0 q u=.25- _ MH 53 .5 tsf Brown clayey SILT, very soft to soft, damp 5 -- ML I _ 42 q u=.5tsf 10 Test Pit terminated at 10' due to caving. _ Heavy groundwater seepage below about 3' . A. 15 TEST PIT LOGS 1,• , +' ! BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK Earth RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultants Inc. • •GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1990 I Date Apr. '83 fPlate 17 , i . • ._ 1 TEST PIT NO. _a_ Logged By JRD -1 IEDate 4/5/83 24- lev. Depth W (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) ♦♦♦ ♦♦.�. ♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦ ♦�♦�♦ 5 —♦ii♦ 32 q =1.0 - ML Blue gray clayey SILT, medium stiff to stiff,damp u tsf I ♦♦♦ (FILL) —i♦i♦i • - ♦♦♦♦♦ 10 — i♦i♦i ♦♦♦i♦. - MH Brown clayey SILT, stiff, damp 41 qu=1.5 1 tsf Test Pit terminated at 13' . 15 - Heavy groundwater seepage below about 12' . Logged /5/83 TEST PIT NO. 20. Elev.JRD23- 1 Date ♦♦♦ ♦♦i♦♦ • •♦x 12 -- 1 ♦♦♦♦♦♦ 1 ♦♦♦♦♦♦ 5 [ 1 ML Dark brown clayey SILT with large pieces of �0��♦ concrete and some wood, medium stiff to stiff, I damp (FILL) III I ♦♦♦♦♦♦ • • ♦�♦�♦ ♦♦ r ♦♦ 17 1 i • 29 ♦♦♦♦ 9 I - Test Pit terminated at 13' . 1. 15 Heavy groundwater seepage below about 12' . 1 I TEST PIT LOGS 0i ,1 t. BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK Earth ! n RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultants Inc. I ` I •GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1990 Date Apr. '83 Plate 18 1 , 1 ' I • TESTPITNO. _21 Logged By JRD Date 4/5/83 Elev. 16— Depth W (ft.) USCS - Soil Description (%) 0 %�♦% i % 18 ML Dark brown SILT with clay, sand, and concrete 5 —♦ ♦ and miscellaneous debris, medium dense, moist to damp (FILL) ♦♦♦ 10 ♦♦♦♦�♦ MH Mottled brown clayey SILT, stiff, dampqu=1.5 3o tsf _ Test Pit terminated at 13' . 15 Moderate groundwater seepage below 12' . • 1 - - I I TEST PIT LOGS i (, BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK Earth I RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultants Inc. - •GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1990 Date Apr. '83 i Plate 19 1 0 4 TEST PI-T NO. 22 Logged By JRD _ i _. - .... 4/5/83 _.. . 16± IDate E lev. Depth (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) 0 S Gray gravelly silty SAND, medium dense, moist(FILL) . _ - I i 9 1 :JM 1 _ I — 38 LL=42 a1 - ML Blue gray clayey SILT, soft to medium stiff, damp PI=10 10 —li I H 34 1 I 15 - Test Pit terminated at 14' . Minor groundwater seepage at 13' . 20 • / TEST PIT LOGS j ii$ / BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK EarthConsultants Inc. II' RENTON, WASHINGTON ‘111/ •GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Prof. No. 1990 I Date .Aar.'83 I Plate -. 201,1 1 TEST PIT NO. 23 Logged By JRD Date 4/5/83 16— E lev. Depth- W (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) SM Dark brown gravelly silty SAND, medium dense, moist (FILL) ML Blue gray clayey SILT, stiff, damp (FILL) 23 11 5 -- I31 ML Mottled light brown SILT with trace of sand, loose to medium dense 10 -� 1 (grading to sandy SILT at 10' ) 34 Test Pit terminated at 13' . 15 _ Minor groundwater seepage below about 11' . 1 J . I I I TEST PIT LOGS f ( • BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK Earth I , RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultants Inc. • •GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1990 I Date Apr. '83 jPlate 21 TEST PIT NO. , 24 . _. Logged By JRD Date 4/5/83 • Elev. •16± Depth W (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) '•♦:♦: SM . Brown silty SAND, loose to medium dense,., moist(FILL; l� ♦♦♦♦♦♦ . .ss•t 191 ♦raj ♦♦♦ ♦♦�• 5 �♦�♦� ML Mottled brown SILT with trace of sand, loose to r• medium dense, damp (FILL) - 34 ♦♦ •, ♦♦ 10 i _ • ML Tan silty SAND to sandy SILT, medium dense, damp ���� SM . . (FILL)• . ♦i♦i 30 ♦♦i♦ 15 — Test Pit terminated at 14' . •- -•-- No-•groundwater-seepage-observed: -- - .. _ ..._._ .._.... ___.._.. -.. 20.- • • • �, TEST PIT LOGS y BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK Earth RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultants Inc. ••GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1990 Date Apr. '83 [Plate 22 I TEST PIT Logged By JRD I Date 4/5/83 Elev. 18- Depth 1N (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) •����� SM Gray brown silty SAND to sandy SILT, medium dense, • ML moist (FILL) •••••• 19 ••i• q u=.5tsf 5 --- ML Blue gray clayey SILT, soft, damp 35 Brown silty SAND-sandy SILT, loose to medium dense, 10 -�:••• SM wet -�' I l 40 -101 Test Pit terminated at 13' . 15 _ Heavy groundwater seepage below about 10' . Logged By JRD + 4/5/83 TEST PIT NO. 26 Elev. 14- Date 0 •�•�• ••• ••" ML Brown SILT with trace of sand-_ , medium dense (FILL) ••�••• :•:- ��� 31 5 — qu=1.25 tsf ML Brown clayey SILT, stiff, damp LL=33 - 39 PI=5 10 �;14:tiI: SM . Brown SAND with silt, medium dense, wet • SP 20 Test Pit terminated at 11' due to caving. Heavy groundwater seepage below about 6' . 15 TEST PIT LOGS . BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK Ti RENTON, WASHINGTON Earth Consultants Inc. ' 'GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1990 1 Date Apr. '83 !Plate 23 • SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES 1 NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH.U.S,STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN r:IM N N v v m' m O 10 O 0 g SO O0 0 10 c�1 N O O 3 § p O • 700� O it N N e-^ m in a a0� N M SE Opp— N O O O O O O. O. O O O ..\ 9 2 m ,....,---- •-., ck--...u.„LL,_,,x),\\ 0 H 90 \ ‘,.. m m so �` so z p-+ m 70 A o 30 70 m0 Z n x . T \ z ��.,�., 'n so 1 \\\\ 40 'R. m _ O o m 50 II 50 D O • •' COi DJ r0 -< f!J — m * 40 - _y 1 60 ,7 { —m — CO G7 — ‘l ' ' '< •=,I 30 +\Se 70 m 1 -o L) 0 20 80 —1 o r t o N. 90 G) O I I ( I 11 ► I 1 lill l I I I I[ II I I I I 1111 100 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CO cO tt CI N .- 00 10 a M N ,-• 00 cD a M N OD tD a M N '�, n D 0 0 O CO (D v M N O O C O O O O 00 O O O O — GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS z Z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE co N COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES N to m vs 0 D Boring or DEPTH Moisture z ,' D KEY Test Pit No. (ft.) USCS DE§CRIPTION Content(%) LL Pt_ co.� 0 N B-1 12.5 MH clayey SILT 41 52 18 z ro N El Q....awn_ B-2 17.5 SM/SP SAND with silt 20 IV CIB-6 0.0 ML sandy SILT 16 —•— B-6 17.5 SP gravelly SAND 10 Z?^„Pf 1771 e• .' (J # ! B:`rY. -� 1?? JI.d2t 4>aGt• 3MCIR@ ¢At:1�+i' I SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS ., I SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH.U.S,STANDARD GRAINLIZE IN MM m A too^ m a P N r:W o Cam N Mom 0 a ao° ID N O 4 AOo Owl N o `Cr CO o c o o `�' o 0 0 0 0 8 �-.s o • H 90 • n ��.+ • '• . _ 1� - _ 10 n ini"i \ 1 Z No m so Il IA - _ zo Z ►4 m 70 - m 30 33 z . -11 60 GI Z — 40 -f m D r .< 1, N o f -- m xi • _ _ _ _ so G) �,— CO -< 70 m o 20 _ \ _ 80 . i . o ! NA 10 _ I-' 90 O 73 Mc G) 0 Fri-El i L II T��{ 100 v N E D M N O CO tO a M N O CO O CO Cr N 00 tD V M N �. O O O O O O O O O O O O +I GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS o R 0 0 0 O CD z �_ COBBLES ro COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE N GRAVEL SAND FINES '0 m n 0 Z Boring or DEPTH DESCRIPTION Moisture w z H D KEY Test Pit No. (ft.) USCS Content (%) LL PL r . ....�.�.t 0 TP-4 7.0 SM/SP SAND with silt 39 'D in iir CDTP-12 4.0 ML clayey SILT 39 45 13 N U' TP-24 13.0 SM silty SAND 30 ! .+ a i Architecture and Planr=.-v- irny Northwest,Inc„Royce A,Berg,A.I.A.,'1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 TRANSMITTAL To: Lenore Blauman Date: February 21, 1991 City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. S. Project Name: Bl ackri ver Phase VI I I Renton, WA 98055 Project No: NW 89017 Attn: e At• !!!!l0®Et,1SloP,! • Re: SA;SM-109-89 FEB 2 1 7997 Description: k/"t c f-1,d .1, olLit vet) 11 prints revised site, landscape and grading plans, per city comments dated 2/21/91 1 original and 10 copies 8-1/2 X 11 reductions of revised site, land- scape and grading plans, per city comments dated 2/21/91 11 copies 8-1/2 X 11 revised Bldgs _A, B, C iwkwage floor plans and elevations, per city comments dated 1/30/91 11 copies 8-1/2 X 11 vicinity map 1" = 200' 1 8-1/2 X 11 colored vicinity map 1" = 200' 1 print each colored site and landscape plans dated 2/21/91 11 copies Historical Narrative 11 copies Chronological Narrative Remarks: _Z/'1'�,,-e'l .• ,❑Sent per your Request X❑ For Approval ❑ Other: /� ? s, EVar,yaur Use/Reference El For Distribution { . In For Review and Comment ❑ For your Records Hand delivered By: Paul R. Coppock for Royce A. Berg cc: W/encl : Dean Erickson, Mark Miller W/plans: Lauch Bethune, Bob O'Connell Chronological History Page 2 g. Traffic analysis provided by Transpo Group, December 1980 to City of Renton I , h. Fill - rights to fill the majority of the old Blackriver Channel on Tract B provided as part of E.I.S. i . Relocation of.storm drainage into Naches Avenue per City of Renton Public Works direction (completed) . ! j. $50,000 archaeological dig conducted by University of Washington and paid ,for by First City (completed) . 3. Shoreline permits SP-093-81, SP-'090-01 issued by the City of Renton for P-1 channel excavation. 4. June 1984 Soil Conservation Service excavated the 17.5 acres dedicated by First City for the channel and detention pond. 5. August 1984 Phase I development ;3i- 1 story buildings off Powell Avenue received hearing examiner site approval . Buildings completed. 6. August 1985 Phase II development 1 - 3 story office building off Powell Avenue received hearing examiners site approval . Building completed. 7. August 1985 Traffic Analysis Valley 405 Business Park update of original 1980 Traffic analysis of Earlington Park provided City of Renton by Transpo Group. 8. September 1985 Traffic Analysis Supplement for 1985 update Valley 405 Business Park (Earlington Park) provided City of Renton by Transpo Group. 9. December 1985 Phase III development 4 - 1 story office buildings and Naches Street received hearing examiner site plan approval . Buildings completed. 10. June 1986 Traffic Analysis for Blackriver Technology Park provided City of Renton by Transpo Group - note this property is to the north of the pond and not part of this submittal . 11. October 1986 City of Renton initiated and City Council passed ordinance No. 4020 which changed zoning of all this property from manufacturing park M-P to office park 0-P. 12. September 14, 1987 grade and fill (SP 100-80) permit approved through City Council appeal decision for Tracts A & B. Mitigation limited areas of fill in relation to rookery from non-specific (no building) on property. 13. October 1987 Phase IV A & B, 2 - 3 story office buildings and Phase V 2 - 1 story office received hearing examiner site plan approval . Buildings completed. Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 Chronological History Page 3 14. May 1987 BCAC Facility submittal for site plan approval (SA-038-87, SM- 006-87), 7 story office facility on Tract A. Application withdrawn. 15. May 1988, Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and S.W. 7th Street LID Completed through by City of Renton. Construction required shoreline permit and occurred during Heron nesting season. 16. August 1988 Phase VII - 7 story office submitted for site plan approval on Tract B. Declared environmentally significant and scoping process defined issues to be incorporated in E.I.S. for Tracts A & B along P-1 detention pond. 17. September 22, 1989 Phase VIII 2(SSA;SM-071-88) - 1 story buildings on Burlington Northern Property (west side of Tract A) was submitted for site plan approval . Environmental . Review Committee determined project was part of Tract A even through purchased separately from Earlington Park purchase. Submittal was withdrawn and incorporated with Phase VII - seven story submittal currently in E.I.S. process. 18. August 1989, Phase VII seven story concept submittal (SA, SM-071-88) was modified with alternate concepts A & B for Tract A which moved the seven story building off the P-1 pond perimeter in accordance with the City of Renton Environmental consultant and staffs recommendations. 19. October 1989, Phase VIII submittal . for Tract A was incorporated with a single one story building and two - 4 story buildings as part of the E.I.S. with Tract A and B, Phase VII schemes; reflected set backs dictated by City of Renton Environmental consultant and staff for the E.I.S. RAB:fvj cnosorivG RvrsioN FEB 211991 ri Sze Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 Architecture and Planr" Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A.Berg,A.LA., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 HISTORICAL DESIGN NARRATIVE January 9, 1991 BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK PHASE VIII TRACT A (SA;SM-109-89) NW 89017 Tract A was originally submitted in September 1989 as two single-story office facilities on the west side of the property and beyond 1000 feet from the heron rookery, which exists to the northeast. The eastern end of Tract A was considered part of the Environmental Impact Statement for development of Tract B, and the entire tract was held up and combined with the EIS processing due to the heron rookery. The proposed development of alternate A-1 was updated to reflect one single- story office building to the west, and two four-story office buildings to the east, which, per the DEIS, these buildings were originally sited beyond 400 feet from the rookery. The current submittal is beyond 600 feet, in addition to a substantial ten foot high berm and tree buffer being established at the 600 foot line from the rookery. The buildings are sited to act as a buffer between the rookery and the parking areas, which increased the allocation of parking to one side of the four-story building, but substantially provides more landscaping, and a passive side of the development on the P-1 channel or rookery side of the complex. The buildings are designed with earth toned colors, hoods or canopy overhangs on the rookery side above 30 feet, and non-reflective glass, except at the main entries. The parking lot will be extensively landscaped with trees at 40 foot intervals within parking areas to minimize visual impacts of parking allocation. The property for 0akesdale Avenue S.W. and S.W. 7th Street was dedicated by First City and were improved, including utilities with the majority partici- pant being First City (in order to develop these properties) . Density of development is well under the traffic proposed to be generated in the Trans- portation Studies. First City funded the study as well as the L. I.D. with the understanding that traffic and L.I.D. assessments for specific projects would be offset against these costs or to the point the assessments exceeded L.I.D. costs. PLANNING DIVISION CITY or Ref rroN FEB 2 1 1991 •ilEPEfi • tI 4 I . zI 1- c I{ 1 1./ / WO' H fr\ '• �*'jx !ittt / i - • ik4A I 27-0'typical I G _L_ _• ._ _._,1 . 157-0' 127-0' I 277-0' TRACT "A" BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK Phase- VIII /40 IFirst City Washington, Inc. NORTH II.�crn,�wF.1 2.Al flA 112].R s'eeL seae aoo owA95"(2°58 1 Story Office Floor Plan (BLDG. A) #NW 89017.1 Scale: 1"=30' 1-30-91 I 03 : 1" , — 270' J. 150' 120' O • r.54'A-2), '',, —3 , ,.________I _.3-- 1 , .. T1 , 4 .. yo4p�i - ''� 3 ' I11 -`� - ��a sty C4klT,. - - ( Main Entry Tinted Glass Reflective Glass Cv EntrY Building A Typical SOUTH ELEVATION — Painted Tit uP Concrete Panels .� __yam MechaNcal Screen �' _� 45' / ' 85` 4 0 T _ — I i t ®-, ._ _.. .. , 'J t Building A Building A EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION - ddfl • e� r • ,_ c _ BLACKI�IVER Building A `�v.c ® CORPORATE PARKCTCek T NORTH ELEVATION • V '\: l ::L... MST OTT oa re c XTS C % . N n --<'31y PHASE VII BUILDING A - 15 :, �'1- 1. 1-30-91 ELEVATIONS 0 . 200' r} 200' II m ° !L.-Proposed IdAm• m O_� Corridor \ °I 38Enn '. __. • o Pmposod Corrldoi v! � II - �--`---iialli o - 1 t' I I// 38����'1 a '�''' rim �7 ti• 4J:!48 b..------�..1— �_ r R&M \ 25' 1\\ \ t ilL;onon 9 y 1. 25' 1, \.. ro 1 C\ \ ■ N\.9.____ ._C__ ______.•__ , • C.\4,. • • • \ (II-- 41hFlOoLAbove.. 3rdFloor Above. 41h:Eloor.Above. FIRST FLOOR PLAN THIRD FLOOR PLAN 200' fi' 200' • _ to . A I O 10 - m I.Q t$� I23 m • 38'- Proposed Corddoi c 38' _, Imposed Corddoi Ix .▪ - - 11,- 1j,IC 02 io 10 ��j�, : �7 o zI 1 Ic°� "1• ------+ �� v �——--------+ Io ■ / L s s: ■ a = P5' I \ ` 14 I. 25 } cal I, t ♦ 1 CtlLEloor.Abave. 3rdFloor Above. SEc ND FLOOR PLAN TRACT UAU FOURTH FLOOR PLAN ® aahxweraa vanrg BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK Phase VIII ® li �` First CityWashington Inc. NORTH LO.DG B BLLDDG C I. � -=r r *03. 9 - % .1127 R giro Soto 300 3. `me'PO" 4 Story Office Floor Plans (BLDGS. B & C) NW89017.1 Scale: 1"=40' 1-30-91 +aa Hooded Hooded Overhangs on Bldg.B Overhangs on Bldg. C Mechanical Screen ''ry.-1--0 1 -' ' PIVIMAIVNttliSIMM0051.1141Sti la.511 a !RED ..;ti.. - -® • .� om' -A ds X s 1 .— 1(r''E3 `EEIDF,3 .1 LJ ` P�— — .. , -�r7 72_ : __ 3 31 LZ?;`i Oa f,/ �i =3 2=IG. 1 1D� 'o P E 4�'� t7. a 021 Er. I Q BLDG. B - N.W. ELEVATION BLDG. B - N.E. ELEVATION BLDG. C - S.E. ELEVATION BLDG. C - S.W. ELEVATION Exterior Insulating Spandrel Panels Tinted Vision and Spandrel Glass Typical ap..—. �' 43 a r 3 3:EM ��NDE ICI `.�a L EETIEEZETEN (2._i 0@a12? _ rn ry l ,11C Tan :1 r3'_i"'' .`l Y'-`�_ "�— j ��1�� 1��• ��3�� a_if`fe,�. j_uG1�� >< . 7� `7E ,.� r- . . . . . . , . / _1 r.171TR•�a, i.-e J!F1 a9i71E_r F7t 3 F SF E .i`t3- -� • gayo Sot- hP >1 1 # al sip •-•-, j.-71 3 7 7:17 E'SITI 1 ram— 9,,r _.ti.3 c., i.__ LiV—� ---. .. 1 In Cloraidsto^ ' a"^' •.• • BLDG. B - S.E. ELEVATION BLDG. B - S.W. ELEVATION BLDG. C - N.W. ELEVATION - BLDG. C - N.E. ELEVATION TRACT "A" b BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK Phase VIII t\1045 6 ,� First City Washington, Inc. �` c 75:-- mac. 4 Story Office Elevations (BLDGS. B & C) #NW 89017.1 Scale: 1"=40' 1-30-91 „,',;k CITE -)F RENTON " Mayor Earl Clymer December 6, 1990 W. Stewart Pope 1655 Broadmoor Drive East Seattle, WA 98112 RE: Blackriver Corporate Park, Phase VII and Phase VIII hearing Dear Stew: Thank you for your letter of December 4, 1990, regarding the Blackriver Corporate Park hearings and for your interest in the earlier environmental impact statement hearings. I have asked City staff in the Planning/Building/Public Works Department to look into this matter. They inform me that the reason the public hearings before the Hearing Examiner have been rescheduled is that the Final EIS for this project will not published until January 9, 1991. Following the publication of the Final EIS, there is a 30-day appeal period; and, only after this can staff advertise for the public hearing on the rezone and site plan review. Public hearings before the Hearing Examiner have been scheduled for March 12, March 19, and March 26, 1991. These are usually held in the City Council Chambers beginning at 9:00 AM on these days. Since the Council hears the Hearing Examiner's recommendation on the rezone portion of the applicant's proposal, Council members do not normally attend the Hearing Examiner meetings or the Environmental Impact Statement meetings. Also, since the Council would hear an appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision on the Shorelines Permit and Site Plan Review aspects of this project, because of the issue of "appearance of fairness” they again would not likely appear. Since I could be asked to cast a vote in a tie situation, I would not appear for the same reasons. As you know, I do share your concerns about the quality of environment future generations will inherit from us and do try to maintain a balanced perspective on these types of issues. If you have specific questions on the project, I would encourage you to discuss these with Mary Lynne Myer, the project manager for this project, or her supervisor, Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator. Thank you again for sharing your views with me. S'ncerely, Eaa , Mayor 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2580 RECEIVED DEC 0 5 1990 'I IQ cn BEV 1655 Eroadmoor Drive East t Seattle , WA 98112 °�' "k` December 14., 1990 Mayor Earl Clymer City of Renton 200 Mill Ave . S. . Renton, WA 98055 • ., r.. :. • Dear Earl: The latest information I have on the Blackriver Corporate Park hearings is that tye have been postponed until March 12, 19, and 26, 1991. . As a member of the Renton Wildlands Preservation and as an old friend I urge you to attend the filet of these meetings. At the last hearing no city councilman appeared. Many of us feel that this type of thing is one that will affect Renton's future greatly and for a long time . Your support would be most welcome . Failing that, we would apprec iate your considering this issue with an open mind at this time and come to a decision When all the facts are in. Our grandehildren will pay for our short-sightedness in acceding to short-term addi- tions to our tax base . Cordially, W. Stewart Pope benefits from these Q3w�r"Y 'w L is ,{- • PKA44tI-Rb1 Sic PLANAI/NCrne o t • • DEC 0 • • 5 1990 JONES&STOKES ASSOCIATES, INC./2820 NORTHUP WAY, SUITE 100/BELLEVUE, WA 9r8004 206/822-1077 December 5, 1990 FAX 206/822-1079 Ms. Mary Lynne Meyer Renton Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Preliminary Review Draft-Final Environmental Impact Statement,Blackriver Corporate Park - Tracts A and B Office Buildings Dear Mary Lynne: In accordance with our agreement for consulting services, submitted herewith are 13 copies of the Preliminary Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Blackriver Corporate Park, Tract A and Tract B Office Buildings. It is my understanding that comments from your review are to be to Jones & Stokes Associates by December 18, 1990, and that Jones & Stokes Associates is to submit a revised Final EIS to your office by December 28, 1990. As I mentioned to you on the telephone, I have not received the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers letter regarding discharge to the P-1 Pond from Mark Miller and therefore were unable to include that information in this version of the Final EIS. Additionally, the matrix table of mitigation measures we discussed, will take more computer setup time than I had anticipated and will therefore be submitted separately at a later date. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerel , W. A-(4-- Jonathan H. Ives Project Manager JHI:jle Enclosures Architecture and Planning . . _ Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc., Royce A.Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 Blackriver Corporate Park Tracts A & B November 16, 1990 Historical Narrative 1979 - Property purchased by First City from Burlington Northern Railroad and zoned G - general . 1981 - Rezoned to MP - Manufacturing Park by hearing examiner. Per July 1980 draft of E. I.S. (Earlington Park) . Final E.I.S. published February 1981 mitigation included First City providing: a. Right of Access Easement to dump soils excavated in P-1 Channel onto adjacent First City Property granted to City of Renton (completed in two phases) . b. Provided temporary access easement to metro facilities through FCE property. c. Dedicated 17.5 acres of property for P-1 Channel and detention basin to City of Renton. d. Dedicated .58 acres of easement for drainage along northern property line of Tract B. e. Dedicated 9.51 acres for Oakesdale LID, SW 7th, Powell and Naches to City of Renton for roads. f. Oakesdale SW 7th and Naches LID participation of First City is projected at over 3 million dollars. g. Traffic analysis provided by Transpo Group, December 1980 to City of Renton. h. Fill - fill of the majority of the old Blackriver Channel on Tract B provided as part of 1981 E.I.S. i . Relocation of storm drainage into Naches Avenue per City of Renton Public Works direction (completed) . j. $50,000 archaeological dig conducted by University of Washington and paid for by First City (completed) . The 17.5 acres of property converted to pond now exists and will continue as the pond between the Heron rookery and the proposed development area. 0akesdale Avenue SW, SW 7th Avenue and Naches Avenue SW are currently improved by First City in an LID. Oakesdale is a major 5 lane road designed to accommodate more than the development proposed on this site. Oakesdale Avenue, the P-1 Channel and Naches Avenue have been completed since May 1988 and construction occurred during Heron nesting season. Blackriver Corporate Park Historical Narrative August 1988 Initial project submitted for site approval (ECF; SA; SM1O9-89) as 7 story, 285,000 SF office building on Tract B. The building was sited at the north western corner of the property to form a physical buffer between the heron rookery and the project. Public notice was posted in the Valley Daily News August 10 & 17, 1988. Project reflected filling part of the old Blackriver Channel as per original E. I.S. for Earlington Park in 1981 by City of Renton. Project was determined environmental significant by City of Renton and posted in Valley Daily News, November 21, 1988. Scoping process and D.E. I.S. process started. August 1989 Alternate site plan concepts A & B for Tract A were submitted to City of Renton by First City Developments Corporation in response to comments generated by D.E. I.S. for proposed building locations. Buildings were located further away from Heron rookery than in original submittal and in conjunction with recommendations from the preliminary draft E. I.S. a. Concept A split the building area into a three story 35 feet high; four story, 57 feet high; and 7 story 90 feet high complex with the required parking in a parking structure. a. Concept B relocated the original 7 story off the north west corner and increased the buffer area and placed the required parking in a parking structure. Concepts A & B are incorporated in the E.I.S. where the initial concept submittal was not. September 1989 Submittal for site plan approval for two one story office buildings west of Tract A (Burlington Northern Property) ECF; SA; SM 109-89. Public notice posted in Valley Daily News September 29 and October 6, 1989. City of Renton combined this site with Tract A & B, E. I.S. for 7 story office submittal . October 1989 Submittal of buildings for balance of Tract A, two - four story office buildings to complete projects specific site plans for E. I.S. Buildings located per City recommendation from preliminary D.E. I.S. and the two one story buildings were reduced to one building. cc: Dean Erickson Mark Miller Amy Kosterlitz Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 Will . 04440 The City of Renton V: 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Phone: 235-2501 Fax: 235-2513 FAX TRANSMITTAL Date: cry . 2! , 1,9 o To: Jc . I vas From: I`�L Subject: '3I€:.dc le-t/►% .— Number of pages excluding cover sheet: 3 BILLING INFORMATION Please remit $ for pages. Payable to: City of Renton Charges: $ 5.00 minimum c/o City Clerk $ 1.00 per page 200 Mill Avenue South $ 10.00 out of state (additional) Renton, Washington 98055 Ten page limit .,rdlitittlehumtui Cdmpnny . REAL ESTATE AND DEVELOPMENT Cidumhin Center,Suite 4640 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle,Washington 98104 Tel(206)386-71 I I Fax(206)386-7241 rI-f Nr\IN(_i DIVISION yOf PEW oN October 29 , 1990 Oft;�' .l (� Iy9U Ms. Lenora Blauman City of Renton Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE : Rivert)ech Corporate Center Phase II Dear Lenora : I discussed with Mr . Ivan Lyons , the Soil Conservation Service Project Manager/Biologist , the enhancement program of the P-1 Channel/Forebay Pond . Mr . Lyons has indicated that biologically, he feels that additional enhancements can be implemented to supplement the existing plan developed by the Soil Conservation Service for mitigation to these areas . Mr . Lyons indicated that the City may have some hydrolic concerns regarding additional plantings in the Forebay area . I would like to meet with you , the Public Works Department and Rod DenHerder , to further discuss the hydraulic concerns regarding this Forebay area . In past discussions with Rod Denllerder , he has indicated that adequate flows should be able to be maintained with proper coordination between the hydraulic specialist and the biologist . The areas labeled Area A and B of your most recent letter are not under our control . These properties are owned by First City Washington, and due to their existing land use process , they cannot give up the opportunity to enhance these areas themselves as mitigation for future development . We are still confident that we can develop an enhancement plan in the dedicated portion of the P-1 Channel/Forebay Pond that will meet the requirements of both the biologist and hydraulic specialist . Ms . Lenora Blauman October 29, 1990 Page 2 I look forward to meeting with you Thursday, November 1 , 1990 , to further discuss the hydraulogical alternatives involved in enhancing the dedicated portion of the P-1 Channel/Forebay. Mr . Lyons, of the Soil Conservation Service, will be in Seattle November 20. He is available to meet with us. at the City of Renton on the afternoon of the 20th to further discuss the biological requirements of the enhancement program. Sincerely, /) 94-d-°&21 ._ - • Soren Davis cc : Ivan Lyons , Soil Conservation Service , Spokane, WA 1 copy Wetland Report from Earth Consultants Rod DanHerder , Soil Conservation Service , Renton, WA RCC II J .A. 3 • • • Architecture and Planning tY pr'i Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A.Berg,A.LA., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle„WA 98101 (2O6)583-8030 PLANNING DIVISION! TRANSMITTAL C;lTY OF RENTON OCT 1 1 1990 To: Mary Lynne Myer Date: October 10, 1990,., r{ �- -`a ��, Community Dev. Dept. Cv•.=-;" I, �°/ ! '�-i' City of Renton Project Name: Blackriver Ph VII/VIII 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 Project No: NW 88041/89017 Attn: Re: Description: 1 original Chronological History of above referenced projects dated 9/21/90 Remarks: ❑Sent per your Request ❑ For Approval ❑ Other: ® For your Use/Reference ❑ For Distribution ❑ For Review and Comment ❑ For your Records By: Royce A. Be' l CC: CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 2809 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON, SEGREGATING ASSESSMENTS FOR PARCEL 1 OF LID#332 WHEREAS, the City of Renton has been requested to segregate certain assessments for Local Improvement District#332 as it relates to Parcel#1; and WHEREAS, the original assessment roll for LID #332 was approved on August 19, 1988; and WHEREAS, Parcel #1 is legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the amount of the original assessment for Parcel #1 was $2,901,526.11; and WHEREAS, Parcel#1 has been segregated into eight parcels; and WHEREAS, the original segregation was based on an agreement; and WHEREAS, the owner of Parcel #1, First City Washington has agreed to segregate the assessments based upon the respective square footages of their ownerships; and WHEREAS, the eight parcels of the original Parcel #1 are legally described in Exhibit'B"incorporated herein and made a part hereof as if fully set forth; and WHEREAS, the segregation will not jeopardize the security of the lien for such assessments or reduce the security for any outstanding Local Improvement District obligations payable from such assessment. PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON AUG 2 91990 RECEIVED NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The Finance Director of the City of Renton is ordered to segregate the original assessments of Parcel #1 of LID #332 between the eight parcels as legally described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto with the tracts bearing the following assessments: Parcel a: $354,008.37 Parcel b: $810,142.01 Parcel c: $421,389.68 Parcel d: $211,699.57 Parcel e: $226,223.23 Parcel f: $253,647.31 Parcel g: $230,417.52 Parcel h: $200,563.35 SECTION II. The total of these segregated assessments equal the total unpaid assessment before segregation and if that should not be, then each assessment will be increased proportionately until the sum of the eight will total the unpaid assessment before segregation. SECTION III. As part of the segregation, the Finance Director of the City of Renton will collect a fee of$10.00 for each tract for which segregation was made. SECTION IV. The City of Renton chooses to charge its reasonable engineering and clerical costs for this segregation in the amount of$75.00. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 13th day of Aug•, 1990. Marilyn P s - , City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 13th day of Aug., 1990. Toni Nelson, Mayor Pro Tempore ved as to form: W Lawrence J. Warren, ty Attorney Resolution No. 2809 EXHIBIT"A" PARCEL 1 FIRST CITY Date of Original Assessment Roll: August 19, 1988 Amount of Original Assessment: $2,901,526.11 • Original Legal Description: That portion of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 13, Township 23 North, Range 4 East W.M., and of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 24, said township and range, described as follows: Beginning on the East line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 24, at a point North 01°05'00" East along said East line 1,804.20 feet from the center of said Section 24; thence North 89°16'47"West 1,033.53 feet to the Easterly margin of 72nd Avenue South, formerly County Road No. 8 (ALSO KNOWN AS the Charles Monster Road); thence North 01°26'34"West along said Easterly margin 404.00 feet; thence South 89°16'47"East 200 feet; thence North 00°43'13" East 300.00 feet; thence North 89°16'47"West 86.42 feet to an intersection with the Southwesterly line of a tract of land conveyed to Metro and described in deed recorded under Recording No. 8207300283, and the true point of beginning; thence Northwesterly along said Southwesterly line and on a curve, the radius point of which bears North 56°16'42" East 722.96 feet, a distance of 142.43 feet; thence North 22°26'02"West along said Southwesterly line 56.79 feet to the North line of said Section 24; thence South 87°26'40" East along said North line 341.02 feet to the Northeasterly line of said Metro Tract, said Northeasterly line being also the Southwesterly line of Tract A, Washington Technical Center, as per plat recorded in Volume 122 of Plats, Pages 98 to 102, records of King County; thence Northwesterly along said Southwesterly line, being a curve of which the radius point bears North 55°39'29"East 422.96 feet, a distance of 87.91 feet; thence North 22°26'02"West along said Southwesterly line 263.09 feet to a line designated"permanent easement boundary"on U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service Map, Sheet 1 of 3, entitled "Land Rights Work Map, P-1 Channel, East Side Green River WPP, -City of Renton, King County, Washington"; thence along said line and on a curve, the radius point of which bears North 05°24'02" East 165.04 feet, a distance of 112.06 feet to a point of reverse curve, the radius point of which bears South 44°18'11"West, 172.96 feet; thence along said reverse curve and said line 133.74 feet; thence West along said line 367.02 feet to a line which bears North from a point on the South line of said Section 13 which is 1,271.76 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence South 143.95 feet to the Northeasterly line of the Charles Monster County road; thence Southeasterly along said Northeasterly line to a point which bears North 89°16'47"West from the true point of beginning; thence South 89°16'47"East 125.40 feet to the true point of beginning; Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. �:.�olution No. 2809 EXHIBIT"B" PROPOSED PARCEL 1-A FIRST CITY Amount of Remaining Assessment: $354,008.37 New Legal Description: PARCEL 1 -TAX ACCOUNT NO.918-800-0140 THAT PORTION OF LOTS 5,6 AND TRACT B,WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER,As RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS,PAGES 98 To 102,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON,KNOWN As LOT 2,CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT No. 015-85 As FILED UNDER RECORDER'S No. 8512169001,RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY,LYING EASTERLY OF NACHES AVENUE SOUTHWEST As CONVEYED To THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDER'S No. 8702100644, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY,CONTAINING 298,784 SQUARE FEET FOR 6.8591 ACRES,MORE OR LESS PROPOSED PARCEL 1-B FIRST CITY Amount of Remaining Assessment: $810,142.01 New Legal Description: PARCEL 2-TAX ACCOUNT NO.918-800-0143 THAT PORTION OF TRACT B,WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER,AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS,PAGES 98 TO 102,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON,LYING NORTHERLY OF SOUTHWEST SEVENTH STREET AS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED FILED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8702100643,AND WESTERLY OF NACHES AVENUE SOUTHWEST AS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED FILED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8702100644,RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, CONTAINING 683,762 SQUARE FEET FOR 15.7427 ACRES,MORE OR LESS. PROPOSED PARCEL 1-C FIRST CITY Amount of Remaining Assessment: $421,389.68 New Legal Description: TRACT A TRACT A,WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER,As RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS,PAGES 98 To 102,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON,CONTAINING 355,654 SQUARE FEET FOR 8.1647 ACRES,MORE OR LESS. PROPOSED PARCEL 1-D FIRST CITY Amount of Remaining Assessment: $211,699.57 New Legal Description: BURLINGTON NORTHERN PARCEL: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON,AND OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24,SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24,AT A POINT NORTH 01°05'00"EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 1,804.20 FEET FROM THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE NORTH 89°'16'47"WEST 1,033.53 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 72ND AVENUE SOUTH, FORMERLY COUNTY ROAD NO.8 (ALSO KNOWN AS THE CHARLES MONSTER ROAD);THENCE NORTH 01°26'34"WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 404.00 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 89°16'47"EAST 200. FEET;THENCE NORTH 00°43'13"EAST 300.00 FEET;THENCE NORTH 89°16'47"WEST 86.42 FEET TO solution No. 2809 AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO MET 11t0 AND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8207300283,AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE AND ON A CURVE,THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 56°16'42"EAST 722.96 FEET,A DISTANCE OF 142.43 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22°26'02"WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE 56.79 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24;THENCE SOUTH 87°26'40"EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 341.02 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID METRO TRACT,SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE BEING ALSO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF TRACT A,WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER,AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS,PAGES 98 TO 102,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY;THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE,BEING A CURVE OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT BEARS NORTH 55°39'29"EAST 422.96 FEET,A DISTANCE OF 87.91 FEET;THENCE NORTH 22°26'02"WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE 263.09 FEET TO A LINE DESIGNATED"PERMANENT EASEMENT BOUNDARY" ON U.S.DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE MAP,SHEET 1 OF 3,ENTITLED "LAND RIGHTS WORK MAP,P-1 CHANNEL,EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER WPP,CITY OF RENTON,KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON";THENCE ALONG SAID LINE AND ON A CURVE,THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 05°24'02"EAST 165.04 FEET,A DISTANCE OF 112.06 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE,THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 44°18'11"WEST, 172.96 FEET;THENCE ALONG SAID REVERSE CURVE AND SAID 133.74 FEET;THENCE WEST ALONG SAID LINE 367.02 FEET TO A LINE WHICH BEARS NORTH FROM A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 13 WHICH IS 1,271.76 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF;THENCE SOUTH 143.95 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE CHARLES MONSTER COUNTY ROAD;THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 89°16'47"WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE SOUTH 89°16'47"EAST 125.40 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE EASTERLY HALF OF CHARLES MONSTER COUNTY ROAD ADJOINING,AS VACATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON BY ORDINANCE NO.4123 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8803070674,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, ALSO THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: • BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24 WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF TRACT"A"IN WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER,AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS,PAGES 98 THROUGH 102,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY;THENCE NORTH 87°26'40"WEST,ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 115.42 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF OAKESDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST; THENCE SOUTH 65°13'S 1"EAST,ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE,207.52 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT"A"AND A POINT OF A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 422.96 FEET,THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 40°45'15"EAST;THENCE NORTHWESTERLY,ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTHWESTERLY LINE, 110.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR OAKESDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDER'S NUMBERS 8612161340,8612221190 AND 8702100643, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24,LYING EAST OF CHARLES MONSTER COUNTY ROAD,ALSO KNOWN AS 72ND AVENUE SOUTH,AND SOUTH OF SAID OAKESDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST.PARCEL CONTAINS 178,675 SQUARE FEET,MORE OR LESS. PROPOSED PARCEL 1-E FIRST CITY Amount of Remaining Assessment: $226,223.23 LOT 1 OF CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT No.016-88 As RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDER'S No. 8910279013,SAID SHORT PLAT BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 4 EAST,W.M.,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON, CONTAINING 190,933 SQUARE FEET,MORE OR LESS. ___solution No. 2809 PROPOSED PARCEL 1-F FIRST CITY Amount of Remaining Assessment: $253,647.31 LOT 2 OF CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT No.016-88 As RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDER'S No. 8910279013,SAID SHORT PLAT BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 4 EAST,W.M.,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON, CONTAINING 214,079 SQUARE FEET,MORE OR LESS. PROPOSED PARCEL 1-G FIRST CITY Amount of Remaining Assessment: $230,417.52 LOT 3 OF CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NO.016-88 AS RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDER'S No. 8910279013,SAID SHORT PLAT BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 4 EAST,W.M.,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON,CONTAINING 194,473 SQUARE FEET,MORE OR LESS. PROPOSED PARCEL 1-H FIRST CITY Amount of Remaining Assessment: $200,563.35 LOT 4 OF CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT No.016-88 As RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDER'S No. 8910279013,SAID SHORT PLAT BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 4 EAST,W.M.,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON, CONTAINING 169,276 SQUARE FEET,MORE OR LESS. Architecture and Planning v Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A.Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 September 21, 1990 Ms. Mary Lynne Myer Senior Planner Community Development Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 SUBJ: Blackriver Corporate Park Site Plan Review Phase VII and VIII, Tracts A and B Environmental Impact Statement (E.I.S.) Chronological History of Project Dear Ms. Myer: Blackriver Corporate Park (formerly known as Earlington Park and Valley 405 Business Center) is south of the currently existing detention pond and riparian forest areas, (which are not part of this proposal and were previously known as Blackriver Technological Park) . 1. Property was purchased by First City from the Burlington Northern Railroad in 1979 with part of the property being used as a golf course and zoned G - general . 2. Rezoned to M-P Manufacturing Park by hearing examiner under condition of completion of an Environmental Impact Statement. • July 1981 - Draft E.I.S. published (Earlington Park ) . • February 1981 - Final E.I.S. published (Earlington Park) by City of Renton and R. W. Thorpe and Associates. a. Final E.I.S. included an additional 25 acres of land to total 109.31 acres. • Mitigation Included: a. Right of Access Easement to dump soils excavated in P-1 Channel onto adjacent First City Property granted to City of Renton (completed in two phases) b. Provided temporary access easement to metro facilities through FCE property. c. Dedicated 17.5 acres of property for P-1 Channel and detention basin to City of Renton. d. Dedicated .58 acres of easement for drainage along northern property line of Tract B. Letter to Myer/City of Renton Page 2 e. Dedicated 9.51 acres for Oakesdale LID, SW 7th, Powell and Naches to City of Renton for roads. f. Oakesdale SW 7th and Naches LID participation of First City is projected at over 3 million dollars. g. Traffic analysis provided by Transpo Group, December 1980 to City of Renton - h. Fill - rights to fill the majority of the old Blackriver Channel on Tract B provided as part of E.I.S. i . Relocation of storm drainage into Naches Avenue per City of Renton Public Works direction (completed) . j. $50,000 archaeological dig conducted by University of Washington and paid for by First City (completed). 3. Shoreline permits SP-093-81, SP-090-01 issued by the City of Renton for P-1 channel excavation. 4. June 1984 Soil Conservation Service excavated the 17.5 acres dedicated by First City for the channel and detention pond. 5. August 1984 Phase I development 3 - 1 story buildings off Powell Avenue received hearing examiner site approval . Buildings completed. 6. August 1985 Phase II development 1 - 3 story office building off Powell Avenue received hearing examiners site approval . Building completed. 7. August 1985 Traffic Analysis Valley 405 Business Park update of original 1980 Traffic analysis of Earlington Park provided City of Renton by Transpo Group. 8. September 1985 Traffic Analysis Supplement for 1985 update Valley 405 Business Park (Earlington Park) provided City of Renton by Transpo Group. 9. December 1985 Phase III development 4 - 1 story office buildings and Naches Street received hearing examiner site plan approval . Buildings completed. 10. June 1986 Traffic Analysis for Blackriver Technology Park provided City of Renton by Transpo Group - note this property is to the north of the pond and not part of this submittal . 11. October 1986 City of Renton initiated and City Council passed ordinance No. 4020 which changed zoning of all this property from manufacturing park M-P to office park 0-P. 12. September 14, 1987 grade and fill (SP 100-80) permit approved through City Council appeal decision for Tracts A & B. Mitigation limited areas Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 r Letter to Myer/City of Renton Page 3 of fill in relation to rookery from non-specific (no building) on property. 13. October 1987 Phase IV A & B, 2 - 3 story office buildings and Phase V 2 - 1 story office received hearing examiner site plan approval . Buildings completed. 14. May 1987 BCAC Facility submittal for site plan approval (SA-038-87, SM- 006-87), 7 story office facility on Tract A. Application withdrawn. 15. May 1988, Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and S.W. 7th Street LID Completed through by City of Renton. Construction required shoreline permit and occurred during Heron nesting season. 16. August 1988 Phase VII - 7 story office submitted for site plan approval on Tract B. Declared environmentally significant and scoping process defined issues to be incorporated in E.I.S. for Tracts A & B along P-1 detention pond. 17. September 22. 1989 Phase VIII 2 - 1 story buildings on Burlington Northern Property (west side of Tract A) was submitted for site plan approval . Environmental Review Committee determined project was part of Tract A even through purchased separately from Earlington Park purchase. Submittal was withdrawn and incorporated with Phase VII - seven story submittal currently in E.I.S. process. 18. August 1988, Phase VII story concept submittal (SA, SM-071-88) was modified with alternate concepts A & B for Tract A which moved the seven story building off the P-1 pond perimeter in accordance with the City of Renton Environmental consultant and staffs recommendations. 19. October 1989, Phase VIII submittal for Tract A was incorporated with a single one story building and two - 4 story buildings as part of the E.I.S. with Tract A and B, Phase VII schemes; reflected set backs dictated by City of Renton Environmental consultant and staff for the E.I.S. Re.p:ctfull Royc= A. g Pres dent RAB:fvj cc: Mark Miller Amy Kosterlitz Dean Erickson Paul R. Coppock Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc., Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 TAX CUT• '. : ---1•rht� �a _ ■ which to build'our-Campaign,'she-- - wunran:died ofdeputy prosecutor . DUWAMISH _'q�here is she?"deputy prosecutor c ' ``Once it's one Momentum buildingsaid. Steve Burgess said.. .•,,.••.; : Site may be a key r gone, `„'+ • ,M If backers of the initiative get the •A,report:by federal investigators , (� its gone.. This is,a i • for'Initlative necessary signatures to_send the •aid the,women,'Sylvia Darlene link to_tribe's past ; f . • measure to the Legislature;options: - o- p id the 48,and her sister,Cene •- - non-renewable.:' v' •,,- Continued from page Al ers Thld then have rhree he prop eIortine Boatwright,56,met O'Neill at Continued from page Al'. : i ■They could ange and'te send it to a nursing home where Boatwright resource.`People i `'- -+a• 150,001 signatures before January; sition without change it to warren,ho report ireiBoatBoat;; for a proposed,condominium ro- .: ' �! -''';;, •"!' though the slawmonar added there that the 1988rn his signature,t thisls -. are going to look'.at ,t. : '.Y couldcanonly be answered concerns that the 1988 initiative'wpresidentialent created y right was and took the blind, jest.'The study uncovered artifacts', �''''^ ' Xrigh O'Neill fired h o. a`t.T area,' and evidence of a i:\p 'Dr- Clapp be aned•her in ne w electio new Primary eble-'1982'Boatwright-applied,to g village ise abeut.videsize`of a /t 10.years from : - started' 'one-woman election. tar e = ?•:= K•.`- . , campaign to roll back property taxes Iieco`me a re resentative a ee;for; football field.' - ''-=--.= ,/ / P Pe Y II They could take no action on it, - P Y now and Sa Wh earlier this year, after'assessments which means it would go to the ;O'Neill and was allowed'to,cash' Since then,'Shong says,•the area Y° y w,.ram, "' _�,;h`•' on the Lake Washington-view home November 1991 ballot,,much'like ocial Security checks for her;pros--•- has remained vacant until Tacoma's didn't We dO r '". -' ,. - 'e utors said.: ., •- : Holly Corp:began can-siructiori at • they purchased in 1970 for$40,000 the so-called Children s Initiative somethin with,., . 2 p` soared to $367,000 in 1989 and did in 1989. ``--Suspicions were raised'when er- the of June:As part of the pro- g•- '' t $637,000 in 1991 ' y Social.•Security agents were_unablen,.1ect,_endo area's,about 1,300 s uare; r rr • ■They'could draft another the q that?: 7 E 'She filed an rmhative to the people slog of the;initiative,,and place the •t�hand'deliver.the birthday.card.in .!feet,•were set aside as ar archeologi that needed 15 ova signatures to original measure ballot a legislative February. 1 ive After two years of cal resource.[ qualify g • failed,ahem is,to, et'the card to;• Mike.Shong:,., llark 9 fyfortheNovemberballot,but alternative choose the ballot,asking rot- p g t After.workers began clearing-the -} her drive languished until mid-June',,ers to between the two prop- n'Neill, Pierce•,County Sheriff? .J land focthe project,Shong,visited•, p' r :-"Once we learned of the• ro'ect's •.didn:t'-'we do somethin . with count); oynty 'budget u nget',Momentum mated`initi Live-like the 1987{S1,-,— . t[etectives;ifinally-visited her•Gra- the site. One eveningtlast,week.he t •development;we:were concerned of; that?;: g count` bud e p hrem,homer+in:May';1ed,heriGra- found materi-eveni documented•in:: ' initiative.'•; ,.I _ search orneoiniyafrant:The ,found no trace,. �ound m International not d in the destruction of the cultural site, ;Althopgh;t o parcels•on the 9.6-'• :,,age 5 P rcaeet ees• next year. an:aver Clof said epiibli ans an tD msup- yed y•. says,Pacheco.',',�yehave lost a lotof.,acre,site;weresetasideandwill not%' a By the July.-6 deadline,Clap�'s'.--,nits fo�fRetiative ,and Demo- 'cifO'Neillepher beotor a h p dated ext the he Iked, no worker to'• resources because of development" be built upon;Shon says much of; initiative.had project-had P the,enivauve.:, .. 4 pt a photo of her dated foundondrthel a n is ra heolo The site,is particularly,interestin g y gathered roughly.' Republican Federaled Seal:Peter vonheReich- -don,. g the site:is'be prele'•archeol a on archeologically, : it o 0 signatures,not enough to bauer.of Way said er has ` 4a; onday.�..;;,;., ;�.,._,r.�;, he keys.. 1 says Shong, because;n,was,eu-sad puttand should bepreserved>Theorigi-;•_ it on the ballot., ., ;..joined withseveral-lawmakers to ` of the rambler,rad "They.were in there; -.•- ,t:an after•whitemen arrived,to the area•,.nal:study;he says;'ran out of time:.•.. Clapp.said Tuesday that when the_ work on.proposed le islati z.-clte fills Irooms'wood shavings-and:had; expertise;and here iris ithoutany and because'oft the:Unusually large .and money and therefore could not Secretary,of State's office assigns a •,would borrow from_legislation original inal t oeneflledwith'w`dsha ing : expert se'remaining eiila eoneofthe, size of the longhouse,.n,, •.•, ti;+•'excavate the entire site,... , •,..•• new numberfon:the,initiative,cam- $ 1 `6 ' g The site,;Shong says,could,also.l 7: • Io speculate von whetherih the declined pBAI-Mortens lnivas-w Boatwright relatives ins[in Duwamish Indians,"Shong says:'•• be'used to get recoghition for the The'riew:information show-s the' each ofga a 14 will try to contact: ,to speculate on the proposal Shong then.wentto Renton offs- Duwamish Indians.:The'Duwamish,'' each of the e ginal Petitions eo 1 g yP -alai Portland„Ore..Officers.found the- slats and to local Indian tribes to.t ;importance'of.the entire site, he, P P e who. mi ht eventuall;be'offered as the rY' he says,is not a recognized tribe and•..says', -r , • ''+'' r: f r their continued suu Port to ask;,; the Legislature's vallot,alternative to Portland,address,to be false;and, to slop,the,work.'Provided with the is instead seen as part of the Muckle-. .r, Among the items Shong found are.•_' •when,they returned found the sisters information and%concerns:from•the __ -port the new initiative.; ;.; lied left Pierce County, Indian tribes,the project's manager• shoot they some,fire-stained cracked rock as hell a�7,�Chargeps -Were- e-tied,o''J,a ua s' `resoled hark uritil;something-was• 'vation of his vicoulllage Prove that were e a t as blue andl fireathat r well j tanks from the ground.'di er the y { says,-, would,be Y glass beads "were real FUEL TANKS■' Brown said ound. he gr will • Office Calculated. t 000 men had •not0comment lies"day',Corp:.would'; more evidencetto becom ng a�recog much indicative [he commonte a tit wo !'DIStrICt d_Inn r remove 15 tanks from the grounds • _ accepHe ted benefits..from Janus' • Y uldn'[: _ t plan of schools and seven tanks from the ,sized tribe;"he says:;;_ ;,. be much,but to me,[hats an obvi- :, January •;.,Shong says the site is an extremely i- ', I Finally;he says;'the site is impor=' alit clue to`an Indian:'-village,"he." uOIIarSI for dirt 'w idat the initial technical.sinstitute.h lrdy 1,•986:to;Junei1989_;:',,..;,' ;� •,;•.:.valuable'historical'and_cultural'site'' ' 'prod process has already The""fisters�were,arrestedonfirstt_.,of the DuwamishIndians'.The siteis remain because.it is one:of•ges last _,says. ;, • ' de cee'ttiefr cFiar`es;in"Salt Lake__;' remaining Duwamishrvilla es stills Lenora:Blauman;•a Renton plan-.• Continued from page Al' proved to be more costly than'expec- $ ,. g thought to be the Sba-badid,village;,. intact. - .-.I�ity,'ftiree'weeks?ago'withrthe van }which contained whaC'isithou'ht totmar, says the city is'continuing to•- roofing and maintenance projects The district re •flatly-offs weeks a'gs'with:fthe ars-''aave beeno tun largha to houg t inl" '•;It' shouldn't'be•trashedt''like• ;investigate;the.new,information, will have to,wait until the next nfu-. 'stora' moved ad gasoline Csaid:'];hey_were`extradited toec i tics' the Puget Sound region. _ one:;he says:.'-'Once it's goner it's I ,Officials visited,tSesite!Saturdays't• sion;of;taxrrecei ts.from ar - h ge to dig 7a 85 cu icended of ounty,and ea1t fits dit ;officials 4g. , Thiu jis;a non-renewable, ''We rri'ayehavesome'new?info% erty,owners,in,t_he spring: Prop avmmi a deg soil fr,cubic siteyardsa-e gV y g The site may,,rdate1liacK:as"Ifac:as IreSource:'People are•going.to tookatl manori'ardrsometimesiwe:need,ar• -She said-the district, 'i "' contaminated a cubic the•stte era ;are lookin fora home for the.do-s, 1;500-years,saysPactie`co,. drste eb still:dgetas _saidDc9st:of, ,00_:a.•. -;.4..; ;`Brown r -IetlOyeaAs'fromn :anduay;?Wly:.newappioach;;'she•says._ i ,�; able,tottiit.to•thereservebudgetas _said. = - - ' ;u,n a.last resort if;a major problem •"Hopefully if there,is,any soil I = 't 'develops in the districts contamination from the waste oil, I 4� '``BER:`CHIRCPRACTIC CENTER' , ( OPEN ��;KENT,; MERICAN:LEGrION., ' ' The Renton School District Board when it•will be contained-in the 1 `' '-" - ''-•""-' ': TO ! v , ' a q »f. " of Directors-already voted to put off •area,. Brown said,. - - ,` ' +' THE �, O M. the reroofing•-projects'at Renton • Bill,Schuck,,manager of Bison 1VOW ACCEPTING PUBLIC BIO'• wed• rhurs.�' I/ Park and. Cascade Elementary r Engineering and Research, is con- ; •'-•• .' DSHS;:CHAMPUS, Medicare', ., - B�`�6 Y '�0�'IOY-A MGHf OUT. •Berye�trawls a Fri _ Schools and the science wing of suiting with the school district on S70 B In p .PellTa6s�s Renton High,School in order to removal of the storage tanks. He _ �=•=:::-'Labor•and=lridustries"and=�: �� I BY S5 Nalf ask SiSl"Extra Pack'- f:::WIN$1000 IN 50 NUMBERS, Snack Bar snake room in the budget for the says he expects minimal contamina- ' --....a-.. ___-_.-_most.nsur nCOS.=:_ ='i�,�„v;;::,.,,•• PROGRESSIVE$500 BLACKOUT&S200 BONANZA •removal of the tanks, lion from the tanks because most of 1111 '=_• <_ -_-_ ' --i-.:,12 Blackouts In'pack/Extra throwawa s= 'yi a will just have fo do patch '•them contained heavy oil and it ' ',=; R . ri Johns,';' =� jobs until the money comes avail- doesn't move'quickly in soil. He •`, r- Z Z S O'• Huber J 'HEW game larmats-NEW payauls•Ma're'Blackouts Included In Packet Games 'i SAME ADMISSION PRICES,-DOUBLE PAY able," said Superintendent Gary also said the ground where most of -f- ' 9003 Canyon Drive `" Serving Kent. Kohl[ ': • the tanks are located is a compact y !or over - Oouble,Pay Packets available,in August for,slop-NO LIMIT . Next to Mill Creek Park -Kent 25406 97th PLS.;KENT 852-9973 • But Robert Brown, facilities and.• soil that will not allow much leach- - 12 years •J (across From French Fieldl- operations manager.for Renton ing. , ! schools,says that may still not be Schucks said if contaminated soil enough.. • • is found at the sites,it will be expen- ! • _ '1We know how much it is going sive. He estimates disposing of a your to host to remove the tanks,but wo as$1 yard nd the may sun as nclu as simerdon't know how much it is going to as$130,and that does not include picnic Headquarters costtoremovethe soil," said theactual digging,and removal pro- tBrdtvn '"It'coul dbealittleoriteels.Ok could be a lot."• Si nee the tanks did not contain an 1,,_�, Brown said no soil testing of the heavy metals or other toxic sub i y J j sites has been done and they will not stances, any contaminated soil will `stir ��'(:,\:r;`� t ' rr+ry;-„. •� •� t' s - - Enter to Win a , .I know how much,if any,contamina- be disposable at any landfill cw,,,..t PLANNING DIVISION e_L S -A-6 CITY OF RENTON JUL 2 0 1990 CITY OF RENTON RECEWED MEMORANDUM DATE: July 20, 1990 TO: Mary Lynne Meyer Senior Environmental Planner Planning/Building/Public Works Department VIA: Sam Chastain, Parks and Recreation Director FROM: Christopher Peragine,AIA, Facilities Designer G�( SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park,Tracts A and B, D.E.I.S. Whatever disposition the proposed development of Tracts A and B might assume, the Department wishes to emphasize that the unique and fragile natural resources of wildlife and vegetation on and immediately adjacent to the subject site could, if nurtured, comprise invaluable features that could dramatically benefit the site, this area of the city, and the entire region. If development does occur and mitigating measures such as setbacks and buffers from the heronry(ries) are established, the required landscaping and earthwork could be designed as a passive recreational amenity affording the public controlled access to the natural habitat of the P-1 Pond and Channel and Riparian Forest. This might take the form of a trail, ten to fifteen feet wide along the edge separating the development from the habitat with trailheads for pedestrians at the east and west edges of the subject property. Such an amenity could be an easement deeded over to the City for maintenance by the Department. It should be noted that the areas of Riparian Forest already ceded by the owners of the subject property to the City and other areas nearby are potentially part of Open Space Bond Issue Programs being considered by the City, County, and the State. If no development were to be the preferred option, the Department would initiate buffering of and limited controlled access to the subject site so that it could contribute to or be an actual part of such land use. CP:wr BLKRVEIS PLANNING DIVISION t CHRISTINE O. GREGOIRE ems`i�ii '�'�f' CITY OF RENTON Director 18B9 c��y STATE OF WASHINGTON JUL 1 8 1990 DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY RECEIVED 4350-150th Ave. N.E. • Redmond, Washington 98052-5301 • (206) 867-7000 July 16 , 1990 City of Renton Planning & Community Development 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 ATTN: Ms. Mary Lynn Meyer RE: Black River Corporate Park Dredge Spoils Sampling Plan Dear Ms. Meyer: After speaking with the proponents ' consultant about the sample plan developed for the dredge spoils area at the Black River Corporate Park Project, it seems appropriate to advise the City of Renton of our recommendations. As you are aware, the 0 Department is proscribed from approving independent cleanup plans by potentially liable persons, but may provide technical assistance or recommendations to local governments under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) . We would recommend, for purposes of obtaining representative screening samples for potential site contamination, that the proponent: 1. Advance one boring from the surface of the dredge spoils to the underlying, undisturbed soil, within each 1500 square feet of spoils bed surface area; 2. Sample at least on-half of the borings within each three ( 3 ) foot vertical interval as the boring is advanced i.e. surface, 0-3 feet, 3-6 feet, etc. ) with each sample analyzed as a descrete sample; and 3 . The remaining samples may be composite samples, at the discretion of the city and the sampler. The analytical regimen proposed appears to address the potential . contamination we currently know about at this site, consisting of: 0 3 s- & 1 JUL-12-'90 16:13 ID:JONES-STOKES ASSOC TEL NO: 1-206-641-3147 #O50 P01 Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc. 1808 - 136th Place, NE • Bellevue, WA 98005 PLANNING DIVISION 40 40 206/641-3982 CITY OF RENTON 206/641-3147 Fax I JUL 1 2 1990 • RECEIVED VIA: Mail Fax Overnight Courier TO: 2� 4' s DATE: . 7 Z/jF6 CLIENT: , • PROJECT: SUBJECT: LowdoedilaSoit4ie er your request n For your review E or your information/use Enclosure(s) U Other: Quantity Description - 43 pr. 25.V N is message . 4 . ; .41 ��.�- n.r-w- _-"�"�' .0# ,tera-"iestiee: _._ ,-.04x4LZE. Ar± z. _,"/ atelet .� .4404 w ai4 ' From: - cc: • • 41, L,,ire7v, 41p4 ,44*.ov/./ Arwkv -0-19e -,0700ry -15•144'-' t47F7 7 -44777 --1171 441477 - otra4,'"1-v-r, 'irt4"7 = et-747# 0/* --rzrora, "7"SrY7 7947 nr717 290" min.-474 ,! "-Iirs*ftrj04164.,,, --0471.70 19:014"c4 _ - 4*-7777 16744".1"1"V 747 fs7°' #41 . 4rt, t":*-7147r 11.*W 1441.74‘117 -.Vr)**7 1,474"•'""V" er,"-‘41 '#),•?" 111g4i- ---Pirrt4114vre-- •.z . 7M mcn,rt ) Tc-TQ-qM7-T:nM 7q1 iflH qinlq-qmnr:ar bT :qi mR,-7T-7nr JUL-le 7J 10;14 1.1);JUIYtt-0I UFSt H::. U4. I tL NU: 1- JO-G41-.314( RJOJ I-'J.3 r Distance Attenuation for Peak Core Driving Noise i es) BesIc sound level atop-off rate: 6 .0 dB/doubling um> Atmospheric absorption coefficient : 0 dB/100 meters se> Reference Noise Level : 100 dBA (peak ) c=> Distance for Reference Noise Level : 50 Peet DISTANCE ATPENUATIONt DI8P CE TO dB CONTOURSt Receptor Noise Level Noise Contour • Distance (dBA) at ' Contour Distance (feet) Receptor value (dBA) (feet) 50 100.0 105 28 100 94 . 0 100 50 200 88 .0 95 89 400 82.0 90 159 600 78 . 5 85 283 800 76 . 0 ' 00 504 1, 000 74 . 1 75 898 1,500 70 .6 70 1, 600 2, 000 68 .1 65 2,851 7,500 66. 1 60 5,080 3,000 ' 64 .6 55 9,451 4,aa0 62.1 50 16,127 5,280 59.7 45 28, 735 7, 500 56. 6 40 51,200 9,000 55.0 35 91, 228 10,560 53.7 30 162,550 15,840 50 . 2 25 289,631 Notes : Drop-off calculations include atmospheric absorption at 0 dB/100 meters, centered at reference distance. Except for sounds with highly distinctive tonal characteristics, noise from a particular source will not be identifiable when its incremental noise level contribution is significantly leas than background noise levels . Contour distance calculations are most accurate within the decibel range of the direct attenuation calculations. ; `- Earth Consultants Inc. ( )/(14 4 ) Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON July 6, 1990 PR-1912 JUL 131990 Washington State Department of Ecology RECEIVE* V Hazardous Waste Investigations and Cleanup Section 4350 - 150th Avenue Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 Attention: Mr. Norm Peck • • Subject: Proposed Soil Sampling, and,Analysis Program of the Dredge Spoils from the P-1 Pump Station Forebay Black River Corporate Park, Tract A Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Peck: This letter describes .the proposed soil .sampling and analysis program of the spoils hydraulically dredged from the P-1 Channel: Pump Station forebay into a retention pond :on Tract A. of the. Black River Corporate Park in Renton, Washington.- During the June. 6, 1990 meeting between Mr.. Norm Peck and. Ms. .Gail Coburn of,Ecology;.Mr. Mark Miller, Mr. Royce Berg, Ms. Amy Kosterlitz, and Mr. Kevin Moxon of First City Development; Ms. Mary Lynne Myer of the City of Renton; and Mr. Steve Hughes of Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI); a preliminary assessment of potential contamination in the dredge spoils was requested by Ecology. At the conclusion of the meeting, it was agreed that Ecology would review the proposed soil sampling and analysis program prior to its implementation. PROPOSED SOIL SAMPLING PROGRAM ECI proposes to sample the dredge spoils at four discrete locations using a 2 to 4-inch ' diameter hand auger._ Analytical soil samples will be collected from a maximum depth of 2 to 3 feet below ground surface. All analytical soil samples will be placed in pre-cleaned glassware, sealed, labelled, refrigerated, and transported under chain-of-custody to a certified analytical laboratory. Soil sampling equipment will be decontaminated ' prior to sampling .and in between each test hole by washing with a trisodium phosphate/water solution and rinsing with distilled water. Based on the available .data collected .on ..emplacement of the dredge spoils. on Tract, A in 1984, the approximate thickness of the'dredge spoils ranges from 3 to 10 feet. The .proposed soil sampling .depths may not 'cover the entire thickness of the dredge spoils. ., However, representative soil samples for characterizing contamination in the dredge spoils should. be found at depths of 2 to 3 feet. • 1805.136th Place N.E., Suite 101, Bellevue,Washington.98005 222 E.26th Street,Suite 101,Tacoma,Washington 98411.9998 Bellevue(206)643-3780 Seattle(206)464-1584 FAX(206)746-0860 Tacoma(206)272-6608 Washington State Department of Ecology PR-1912 July 6, 1990 Page 2 Given the fine-grained soil matrix, the potential for downward migration of contaminants, during settlement in the retention pond in 1984 or subsequent downward migration with infiltrating rainfall, appears low. Therefore, if significant contamination is present in the dredge spoils, we expect to detect it within the upper 2 to 3 feet of spoils. Borehole and test pit logs of the native soils indicate that delineating the contact between the bottom of the dredge spoils and the underlying native soils may be difficult due to the similarity of their physical composition (primarily silty sand/sandy silt). Therefore, sampling the upper 3 feet of soil will ensure that the dredge spoils are sampled rather than the underlying native soils. During the June 6, 1990 meeting, the possibility of using a mobile hollow stem auger drill rig, equipped with split spoon samplers, was also discussed. The use of a drill rig would facilitate sampling of the entire thickness of the dredge spoils. However, the close proximity of the heron rookery restricts the use of heavy equipment on Tract A until July 15, 1990 or later. Furthermore, First City Development would like to proceed with the proposed soil sampling program on July 9 or 10, 1990 in order to avoid potential costs associated with delaying their development plans. LABORATORY ANALYTICAL PROGRAM One soil sample or composite soil sample from each test hole will be submitted to the project laboratory for a priority pollutant scan which includes the following tests: . Volatile Organics (EPA Method 8240) ▪ Semi Volatile Organics (EPA Method 8270) • Chlorinated Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (EPA Method 8080) ▪ Priority Pollutant Metals (Atomic Absorption/Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectroscopy) • Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPA Method 418.1) ▪ Hexavalent Chromium (EPA Method 7195 pr 7196) ▪ Cyanide SCHEDULE First City Development would like to complete the requested preliminary assessment of the dredge spoils as soon as possible. Therefore, your expediency in reviewing and responding to the proposed sampling and analysis program for assessing potential contamination in the dredge spoils would be appreciated. Earth Consultants, Inc. • Washington State Department of Ecology PR-1912 July 6, 1990 Page 3 CLOSURE If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact us. Sincerely, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Marcus L. Pierce Project Hydrogeologist 7 Steven-13. I fghes G ` Senior Hydrogeologist MLP/SHP/tmb [E1912.L 02) cc: Mark Miller, First City Development Mary Lynne Myer, City of Renton Gail Coburn, Washington State Department of Ecology Earth Consultants, Inc. Earth Consultants Inc. �� E -- -: - Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists 6 Environmental Scientists ct,7 p -,-,/. - -- •-,; t • 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 101, Bellevue, Washington 98005 rr, ULto'9a %'F'--° `fr--- -'� , -4- .-, 5060488 I .l.a.POSTAGE City of Rento 411/ Municipal Building • 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 • . ATTN: Mary Lynne Myer . .. 11:.1 .1::1=11i::l1:1 1:1I::1:1:=:111=thh-lii:sii:1 d PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON JUN 2 1 1990 RESOLUTION NO, 2802 RECEIVED A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO APPLY FOR FUNDING ASSISTANCE FOR AN AQUATIC LAND ENHANCEMENT ACCOUNT PROJECT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES. WHEREAS, under the provisions of Chapter 79 . 24 . 580 , RCW, state funding assistance has been authorized and made available to aid in financing the cost of land and the construction of facilities for public access to, and aquatic land enhancement of, state-owned aquatic lands; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renton considers it in the best public interest to participate in the following programs : Lake Washington Waterfront Access and Trail - improvement of the Jordan Larue property as part of the proposed Cedar River Trail project - acquisition of the Black River Riparian Forest and Wetlands . NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I . The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects . SECTION II. That the Mayor is authorized to make formal application to the Department of Natural Resources . SECTION III . That any fund assistance so received be used in the acquisition and development of the three projects previously listed. 1 s RESOLUTION NO. 2802 SECTION IV. That the city' s share from the project will be derived from open space bond monies made available to the City of Renton. SECTION V. That any property acquired with financial aid through the Aquatic Land Enhancement Account will be placed in use in accordance with the terms of the financial aid approved by the Department of Natural Resources . SECTION VI . That this resolution become part of a formal application to the Department of Natural Resources . SECTION VII . That adequate notification has been given and opportunity provided for public input. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 18th day of June, 1990 . (_i'/ / / ,L; vit-i Marilyn (,a. etersen, City Clerk APPROVED BY. THE MAYOR this 18th day of June, 1990 . S:). { ( .,1 i' , Earl Clymer, M, i g-'\. Approved "s to form: Lawrence J. War , City Attorney RES . 98 : 6/13/90 2 I ' upr _ LL , .., CITY OF RENTON .r Community Development Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director I ' June 25, 1990 Mark Miller Vice President Development FirstCity Washington, Inc. 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Mark: After receiving your letter dated June 19, 1990 from Mary Lynne Myer, I contacted the Finance Department and found that FirstCity Washington, Inc. had indeed deposited $78,450 with the City of Renton in 1989. I am certainly sorry for the mix-up, and, if I can be of further assistance to FirstCity, please feel free to contact me at 235-2563. Thank you for your patience. Cordially, /A _ I Mary R Planning ision 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Y Y - Suite 4170 800 Fifth Avenue PLANNING DIVISION Seattle, Washington 98104 CITY OF RENTON (206) 624-9223 Facsimile (206) 382-9752 JUN 2 1 199n liRstCily WASHINGTON, INC. RECE WE D June 19, 1990 Ms. Mary Lynne Myer CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: INVOICING Dear Mary Lynne: I received your phone message inquiring about invoicing. I have enclosed a copy of the most recent invoice I have received from the City of Renton. Would you investigate the account because I cannot see where they have given me credit for the $75,000 we issued to the City of Renton for the EIS work approximately one year ago. Very truly yours, FIRST C TY WASHINGTON, INC. Mark Miller Vice President Development MM:sp encl. MM0619.10 File: 4): CITY OF RENT(''' , INVOICE FINANCE DEPT. • 200 MILL Al _. • RENTON, WA 98055 ' ;' OATE < ACCOUNT INVOICE :CUSTOMER:REFERENCE :PAYMENT DUE EORANFORMATION'CALL* . 05/31 / 0 070007 5201 06/20/90 Policy Development - 235-2552 First City Developments Corp. First City Washington Inc JUN 0 4 1990 800 Fifth Ave Suite 4170 Seattle W ' 7 Attn Jonathon Ives • r • •••;• • AMOUNT. Billing for the following invoices for consulting services on First City Phase 7 EIS : March 8, 1990 27.658.00 May 8, 1990 10.615 .18 ( Invoices attached) Total Amount Due 38. 273 .18 CUSTOMER COPY . : - • ' 7 " --- • . . •.- 1104.) Eirst City Developments Coro• \")i • JUN 0 t- • • • • JONES& STOKES ASSOCIATES, INC. / 1808- 136TH PLACE, NE / BELLEVUE, WA 98005 206/641-3982 •FAX 206/641-3147 DATE: March 8, 1990 TO: City of Renton 200 Miil Avenue, S Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Consulting Services_ .,:_- ..February 1990 First City Phase 7 EIS ` INVOICE Services Rendered: Completed and submitted Preliminary Draft EIS to City and FCDC for review. Met with City and FCDC to discuss issues and review comments. Cost: $27, 658. 00 Please make check payable to Jones & Stokes Associates. Sincerely, (4..a,____4_6„.." • ' for Curtis E. Spencer A/A CHAR.: 0, LAWS OF /d S8, �/• /57 t!+Y '.f ,. _.}: ;, ,_;....,, , ;r : ' DDd/aDa %. /0. . .. • I V 397 6 199i7 •I ,. rf JONES& STOKES ASSOCIATES, INC. / 1808- 136TH PLACE, NE / BELLEVUE, WA 98005 206/641-3982 FAX 206/641-3147 DATE: May 8 , 1990 TO: City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue, South Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Consulting Services - April 1990 First City Phase 7 EIS INVOICE Services Rendered: Prepared and printed Draft EIS. Printing costs (two printings) $1, 178. 98 greater than budgeted in contract (see attached) . Cost: $9 , 436.20 (per contract, submit Draft EIS) 1, 178 . 98 (additional printing costs) $10 , 615. 18 Please make check payable to Jones & Stokes Associates. Sincerely, • for Curtis E. Spencer Renton - First City Phase 7 $1,130. 98 Added printing costs Added staff time to coordinate second printing: 48 . 00 Evans : 1. 5 hrs @ $32 Additional Costs $1,178.98 ciiAuER nis LAWS Of 1965 CiTY TON CERTIFjCATION LITUF i',iNAt TY OF IHE A )R ,--)i{MfX)A.; 3`..; tik•AN!) tiMPAle• !CN AG.kiNST ","1. R::NION„\Ni DIA): AM Ail TC: A1.1144:.:N11 A CR j ftY CLAM. (.41x0-,0 el 5 AGENDA PARKS AND CURRENT PLANNING BLACK RIVER FINAL EIS JUNE 25, 1990 1. Summary of the status of the EIS 2 . Questions for discussion: a. Does the property have resource or open space values of ultimate importance to the City? b. Is the property part of a trails, park or open space plan for the City? What facilities or set asides are of interest to the Parks Department? c. Are there funds available for purchase of the property? . Is the property included in the Open Space Bond funds? d. Is it possible to achieve open space or recreational use of the property in other ways, besides aquisition? 3 . Decisions and Action Items League of Women Voters of King county South 425 SW 144th, Seattle, WA 98166 Promoting political responsibility through informed and active participation of citizens in government June 25, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Ms. Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner JUL 1990 Department of Community Development RECEWED City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Ms. Meyer: _ We are writing to second the concerns expressed by citizens of Renton about the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement of April 1990. We agree that the heronry should not suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of any proposed development. In any land use decision first consideration should be given to the effect on natural elements. While recognizing the need to balance those activities dependent on natural elements with the needs of people, we believe uniqueness and scarcity as well as the probable irreversibility of decisions should be a major consideration in decisions by the City of Renton to resolve land use conflicts. Specific concerns with regard to the Blackriver EIS include the placement of buildings and parking areas too close to the heronry. Without adequate buffering, herons and other wildlife can be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, and poor air and water quality. Paving in this area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. We believe that whenever possible natural topography such as wetlands should be utilized as buffer zones between developments. This can benefit both the general public and employees in the developments. Donald Verrico, environmental affairs manager for Du Pont, is quoted in the July 1990 National Geographic Magazine as saying, "Wildlife management makes people feel good about where they work." Thank you for your efforts to ensure responsible and effective land use management. Sincerely yours, Marian Calhoun President, LWV of King County South JES ,L .0 V Er( L� [iis pos.:1• I: l+,r FSJU? /9CO 1992 Cif,_`IMP.1i; GA. -S ' • Ms. Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development The City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South ill Renton, WA 98055 ii:l::i::isli::::l:l!:i:l:::I:i:::lll::l:l=i:=::II:l •% : CITY ,LIF RENTON Community Development Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director I - June 8, 1990 Mark Miller First City Development Corporation 800 5th Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Issues for Final EIS resolution Dear Mark; Thank you for facilitating the June 6 meeting between First City, Department of Ecology and the City. I faxed you my summary of this meeting. I would appreciate your review of its accuracy, according to your understanding of the agreements reached. I felt the meeting clarified concerns. It also gave direction for researching the possible soils contamination on site. Methodology and timing for soils testing was one of the discussion items of the meeting. After the meeting, I consulted with Don Erickson, Chief of Current Planning, and also I researched the nesting cycle of the herons. Based on information from Jon Ives, the EIS consultant; the U. S.Department of Wildlife and the Washington State Department of Wildlife, at this time, the eggs are in early stages of hatching, and the fledglings are susceptible to noise and human intrusion. If any soils tests are made between now and July 15, we must be advised in advance. In addition, the consultants should be directed to use a non- motorized hand auger and limit their time on site. Norm Peck from the Department of Ecology indicated his theoretical approval of this method, given the circumstances. I suggest you have your consultants discuss their work plan with DOE, prior to testing. After July 15, a. drill rig could be used. Testing should not exceed the two day time limit discussed in our June 6, 1990, meeting.. I understand twenty-five to thirty blows would be required. Please inform me if this is not correct. Again, I suggest your consultants discuss their work plan with DOE, prior to testing. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 As regards other items for resolution in the FEIS, I noted the following from our discussion June 6 with Royce Berg, Amy Kosterlitz, Kevin Moxon, you and me: heron studies traffic update wildlife/habitat additions history of the project and past mitigating measures granted by First City additional discussion on Comprehensive Plan and Green River Valley Plan security issues in the Parking garage parks concerns I conveyed these items to Mr. ives, and told him to contact you for background, research and/or information on any of them. Finally, the project is scheduled for hearing with the Hearing Examiner on July 17 . Clearly the work needed for the FEIS will not permit us to meet this schedule. I have asked Mr.Ives to submit a revised schedule which I will discuss with you as soon as I receive it. At that time, we can reschedule another date with the Examiner. Again, thank you for your continued cooperation and effort in resolving issues. Please call me at 235-2550 if you have questions or concerns. Sincerely yours, 21;/14,Alf_cifrrvr{:h1-110-4--* Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner Current Planning cc Royce Berg, 1pn Gail Colburn, Department of Ecology Norm Peck, Department of Ecology Jon Ives, Jones and Stokes Donald K. Erickson, Chief, Current Planning Suite 4170 800 Fifth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 PLAlV1�J FOcsiimil) 624-9223 Facsimile (206) 382-9752 Ca NG �A1 of RFNTonrroN FRS1CLEy WASHINGTON, INC. JUN - 1 ?990 F? ECEIIIED May 31, 1990 - Ms. Mary Lynn Meyer CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK EIS Dear Mary Lynn: Thank you for faxing the letters from the Department of Ecology, as well as U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Confirming our phone discussion yesterday, you indicated that you would have the City copy all the "comment letters" and forward them on to me. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, FIRST CITY WASHINGTON, INC. Mark Miller Vice President Development MM:sp MM0531.1 Architecture Planning Q r Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A.Berg,A,I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 May 21, 1990 Ms. Mary Lynne Myer City of Renton Community Development Dept. 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, WA 98055 I e. RE: Blackriver Corporate Park Tracts A and B NW 88041 SUBJ: Comments on draft EIS ECF;SA;SM-071-88/ECF;SA;SM-109-89 dated May 11, 1990 Dear Ms. Myer: Per our review of the Draft EIS and the public comments presented at the public meeting on May 1, 1990, we are providing the following comments for the record and review of the EIS. 1. VEGETATION TABLE 1-2, Page 1-6 and reference P.1-11: mitigating measures . .participation with the city of Renton in a similar planting program with King County and the S.C.S. on land adjacent to the P-1 and and Springbrook. " We feel this requires clarification or rewording; the land that comprises the pond, Springbrook and the buffer from the high-water line to the current parcels A and B property lines was dedicated by First City to S.C.S. and Renton to create the pond. First City should not have to further participate in funding off-site landscaping. The landscape program established by S.C.S. included the natural grasses that exist today and provide the visual amenity and habitat as photographed and painted by the speakers at the public hearing for the DEIS. We recommend this read as previously quoted in earlier drafts: "City of Renton should coordinate a similar planting program with King County and S.C.S. Engineers on land under their jurisdiction. " 2. ITEM 1 ABOVE AND PER PUBLIC TESTIMONY AT THE HEARING OF THE DEIS: It is important to note that the habitat, pond, tree and grass areas photographed and presented in slides and artists' paintings at the hearing will not change with the proposed developments. These areas, the buffer from the pond to the new parcel lines, the existing significant trees and wetlands on the parcels will remain intact. ' .47h!1/sal -V s._T� -s- 1160,- 111 41 Letter to Myer/City of Renton Page 2 To combine all comments in one letter, we also need to reiterate the following: 3. The original submittal for Tract B reflected a seven-story office building (located adjacent to the P-I pond) that would function as a buffer between the heron rookery and the parking areas, with the old Blackriver channel being filled per the original approved EIS. This was the basis for the current DEIS. After reviewing the preliminary EIS consultant comments, First City revised the proposals to the alternates (A-1, B-1 and 6-2) per the consultant recommendations (including revising the building locations) . This initial concept is currently reflected in the DEIS, Appendix B, figures 2 and 3 on the Great Blue Heron. This provides the public with a copy of the original submittal , but also confuses the issue in relation to the proposed alternatives which preserve wetlands, establish heron flight zones and locate buildings per EIS consultant recommendations. R•sp:ctfully 'oy• g Pry ident RAB:mp cc: Don Erickson Mark Miller Dean Erickson Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A.Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 /29z' 5/2ii//0 `7--1a s E/s PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAY 1 0 1990 City of Renton RECEIVED MEMORANDUM TO: Ms. Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Department of Community Development VIA: Sam Chastain, Acting Director, Parks and Recreation FROM: Christopher Peragine, Facilities Designer vv RE: Blackriver Corporate Park, D.E.I.S. - Parks and Recreation Department's Concerns and Recommendations DATE: May 16, 1990 The draft E.I.S. does not satisfactorily address Parks and Recreation Department concerns in Chapter 3 - "affected environment, significant impacts and utilization measures. " Some of the reasons are as follows: 1) Section 3 .9 (on page 3-68) "affected environment" : To say that "activities might include bird watching and lunch time relaxation" does not recognize the varieties and types of use such as hiking, walking, interpretation and education and the environmental amenities that could support such activities and that are truly at issue. Furthermore, Habitat Preservation (if not reclamation, ) Land Use Development standards, and . Public Open Space are some other concerns that we feel could be listed under your heading "Parks and Other Recreational Facilities" (the very heading seems to undercut our department's goals) . The part of the Blackriver Corporate Park site that is the location of this project is a sensitive environment. If this proposed development is determined to be appropriate, then our department would like to help enhance water quality, plant life and other site essentials by addressing factors that concern, for example, encroachment and controlled use. Memorandum May 16, 1990 Page 2 of 2 2) Section 3 .9. 1 "Impacts" and "Mitigation measures" : Because of the preceding very limited definition of "affected environment", only the use of existing Parks and Recreation services is addressed. No mention is made of potential or even proposed Park's Department projects such as the P-1 trail, its surrounding sensitive environment, and the potential enhancement of same. 3) Chapter 2 "Description of the Proposed Action and Alternatives": While the introduction to this chapter begins to establish standards (eg: Figure 2-1, Significant Environmental Features/Recommended Setbacks; Tracts A and B, Blackriver Corporate Park) these are not thereafter addressed. The Mature Cottonwood of Tract B, the Wetlands of Tract B, the 1, 000' and 600' radii from the Great Heron Rookery and the Heron Flight Zones are aspects that affect our Department. These sort of "determinants" do not seem to have noticeably affected any of the proposed Site Plans. Sam, Bill and I appreciate your taking the time to inform us of this project's review status and process and some of its recent history. However, we remain convinced that the proposed project's siting, area and bulk cannot be adequately modified by the measures proposed such as planting, linear buffers, non-reflective and tinted glazing and 600' planting setbacks and that these comprehensive issues are a legitimate concern of our Department. C: J. Webley i • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 31067 Kathleen Hoover ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six - months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King -- - --- - County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal NOTICE OF EXTENDED COMMENT PERIOD newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for RENTON, WASHINGTON King County. The City of Renton has extended the official comment period for Black River Corporate Park DEIS (ECF;SA;SM-071- The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition 88/ECF;SA;SM-109-89)from May 11, 1990 , Renton Edition y ' , Auburn Edition , (and not in to May 25, 1990. All comments must be supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers postmarked on or before May 25, 1990,to PP g Y be considered. during the below stated period. The annexed notice a P u^li c Notice Please send comments to: Community Development Department, Attention: Mary (Extended Comment Period) 1ti4.! 1 2�i ; Lynne Myer, Project Manager, Renton City Hall,200 Mill Ave. S., Renton,Washington 98055. Published in the Valley Daily News May was published on Ni y 7 , 19 9 0 17,1990.R4128:Acct.No.51067 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$ 13 . 30 -M e-(K), -�� Subscribed and sworn before me this 2 3 rd day of 1i .-19 9 0 tary Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN 487 Revised 4/89 PLANNING DIVISION CfTY OF RENTON JUL.C1A 6E1990 //id/ Ilt°41 sfy iF'R 2 '98 12:2S LPN ARCHITECTS (20S)583-8?88 P :14.4 I pie TACOPvid ILE l''I 'AL COVER SHEET a 4 � 1Av ,111Z Pre PLANNING DIVI SION ISION 1 ' CITY OF RENTON APR 2 7 1990 • RECEIVED • • • • _.. _ • • M1r • pp HF c:( '7U J.L.L4 Lrn HM1-4111C-1-1 1.. U17)D0.7-uruo F.Gla Architecture and Plannin,r, •", Leoson Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A Berg,AJA, 1127 Fine Street,Surte 800 Seatfle.'WA 98101 120X).)ts83-8030 April 27, 1990 Nary 1:,ym CIY,y GC 001,1 1,.aGi tiI • v1-7, • • • • - at I ed • • • -.• . • -• • • • ; • Tract ' • 41;.(-? • • What • • . , • • • „";, I . ..t • 6-1 • • „ II • • • r,. • [-)-2 •: • fji II . , ,• "e127 • •.:. . • ',074 ) ' ' j• , • . • CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: April 16, 1990 TO: Mary Lynne Meyer,Senior Environmental Planner FROM: Penny Bryant, Crime Prevention Coordinator SUBJECT: DEIS -BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK OFFICE BUILDINGS As we discussed briefly sometime ago,the police department is concerned about the potential parking structures that may be constructed in conjunction with the Blackriver Corporate Park. The concerns that the police department has surrounds the probable construction of a parking structure. Parking garages are known for the lack of security they provide and the increase in vulnerability that they cause for the users of such structures. Such facilities are typically dark,making it difficult to see,floors are on a grade,further obstructing sight.There often is no method of summing aid. Blackriver Corporate Park is not a solely occupied facility such as Boeing and they do not indicate that the facility will be secured,keeping illegitmate users from entering the grounds and subsequently the parking structure without being confronted. There are several ways of mitigating these problems,most would come later through site plan review,but I'll mention them now for informational purposes: 1. The stairwells and elevators should be on the exterior ends of the building and they should be constructed with glazing material that allows visibility of the occupants from outside the structure. 2. Stairwells should be equipped with emergency notification systems,call boxes or phones for emergency response. 3. The parking structure should have a minimum eight foot clearance throughout the garage. 4. The structure should have designated walking paths that are illuminated. 5. All stairwells and elevators should be clearly marked and the direction in which to travel to reach them, also marked. 6. The parking structure should have lighting in the stairwells at all times. 7. The management should encourage that the parking structure be the last to arrive,first to leave parking area. Attachment A The following citations include pertinent Renton and Washington state environmental policies. This is not intended to be a complete listing. CITY OF RENTON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Purpose: The primary purpose of this Comprehensive Plan is to define and establish the policy relating to the development of the community as a whole. . . (pg. 3) Factors to be considered (not in order of priority) are . . . public interests prevailing over private interests. (pg. 3) The purposes of the Comprehensive Plan are: To inject long-range considerations into the determination of short-range actidns. (pg. 3) Plan Elements. The Comprehensive Plan may include any or all of the following optional elements: (pg. 4) B. A recreation and open space element, indicating a comprehensive system of areas and public sites for . . . open space areas; C. A shoreline element setting forth policies concerning restoration, and natural environment; and historical, cultural, and educational values; E. An environmental element indicating environmental conditions and natural processes including air quality and wildlife; F. A land capacity element indicating suitability and capability of lands for uses such as preservation; J. A unique site element identifying sites of historical, archaeological, ecological, or scenic significance. General Goals, Objectives and Policies (pg. 8) I. Environmental Goal:.: To establish and maintain a harmonious relationship between the developed community and its natural environment. (pg. Si A. Balanced Development Objective: In order to maintain an acceptable quality of life, land use decisions should be based .upon a balance of public service, economic feasikijlity, and environmental considerations. (pg. 8) * C. Open Space objective: Open space should be obtained and retained in selected areas. (pg. 8) I Policies: 1. Existing open space that serves a public purpose should be retained and made available for a variety of open space uses. 2 . Natural vegetation, . . . and waterbodies should be preserved to retain open space. 3 . Open space should be located throughout the City and incorporated as an integral part of all development. 5. Areas or strips of open space should be retained and enhanced to serve as buffers. * D. Wildlife Habitat Objective: Wildlife habitats should be designated, preserved, and enhanced. (pg. 9) E. Vegetation Objective: To preserve scenic beauty, prevent erosion, protect against floods and landslides, minimize air pollution, and reduce storm drainage system costs. (pg. 9) Policies: 2. In unique and/or fragile areas, desirable natural vegetation should be retained or enhanced. * F. Resources Objective: Natural resources and areas having scientific or educational value should be identified and preserved. (pg. 9) * J. Marshes, Bogs, and Swamps Objective: Selected marshes, bogs, and swamps should be preserved and enhanced for water retention, wildlife habitat, and open space. (pg. 10) M. Soils Objective: Development should be harmonious with the soils. (pg. 11) IX. Community Facilities Goal: E. Heritage Objective: The City's cultural and historical heritage should be preserved. (pg. 25) Green River Valley Policy Plan (pg. 31) 7. Open Space/Greenbelt (pg. 41) Policies: o Springbrook Creek, where it maintains an alignment separate from the P1 Channel, should be designated a greenbelt. A-2- o Greenbelt should be utilized for open space, flood control, wildlife habitat, and other low intensity uses. * 8. Wetland/Wildlife Habitat/Floodplain (pg. 42) Policies: o Remaining wildlife habitat in the Valley should be preserved or its loss should be mitigated. o Areas that provide wildlife habitat, such as designated wetland Greenbelt and stream corridors, should be large enough to provide suitable cover for wildlife and buffering from adjacent uses. o The City's 1981 Wetland's Study should be used as a basis for establishing the priority of wetlands in the Valley. (The 1981 Wetland' s Study determined that the Blackriver Riparian Forest and Heronry was the most valuable wetland in Renton. ) o A substantial portion of the Black River Riparian Forest should be preserved in its natural state as a unique remnant of the Valley flora. Definitions: (pg. 69) Open Space: A portion of the City which has not been developed and which is designated to be preserved in its natural state for outdoor recreation use, wildlife habitat, or similar uses, or to maximize potential hazards. *Public Interest: That which is of concern or benefit to all the residents of the City, including future generations, as opposed to the concern or benefit of special interest groups. Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan (pg. 71) Goal 2: Conserve, enhance and improve recreational and cultural opportunities for the public. (pg. 73) Objectives: o Conserve areas with critical or unique natural features -- such as stream corridors, wildlife habitats, shorelines, and wetlands -- especially if endangered by development. o Increase public awareness of in appreciation for special natural features through education and interpretive measures. o Support a city-wide network of open space and greenbelts to protect sensitive lands (such as stream corridors, wetlands, and steep slopes) , to serve as urban connectors and dividers, and to provide for passive recreation. -3 Summary of Recommended Community Park Acquisition Priorities: (pg. 76) 2. Acquire city-wide wetlands 4. Acquire land for trail links, greenbelts, urban connectors/dividers city-wide. Note: See the Renton Environmental Ordinance, which follows. The Ordinance, in conjunction with Comprehensive Plan, describes conditions used to impose mitigating conditions. The Valley Plan is included in the Comprehensive Plan. RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (SEPA) , TITLE IV (BUILDING REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260, i.e. , Code of General Ordinance of the City of Renton Section 4-6-3: Authority: The City of Renton possesses the authority to deny or condition actions in order to mitictate or prevent probable significant adverse environmental impacts. " * Section 4.6.2, Intent: A. The City of Renton, recognizing the critical importance of restoring and maintaining environmental quality declares that it is the continuing policy of the City, in cooperation with Federal, State, and other local governments and in cooperation with other concerned public and private organizations, to maintain conditions under which man and nature can exist in productive harmony. D. To the fullest extent possible, the policies, regulations, and laws of the State of Washington and ordinances of the City shall be interpreted and administered in accordance with the policies set forth in this Ordinance. * F. This Ordinance sets forth methods and procedures which will insure that presently unquantified environmental amenities and values will be given appropriate consideration in decision making along with economic and technical considerations. Section 4-6-22 : Substantive Authority: A. The policies and goals set forth in the this Ordinance are supplementary to those in the existing authorization of the City of Renton, King County. * B. The Citymayattach conditions to a permit or approval for a proposal so long as: A-y 1. Such conditions are necessary to mitigate specific probable adverse environmental impacts identified in environmental documents prepared pursuant to this Ordinance; and 4. The City has considered whether other local, State, or Federal mitigation measures applied to the proposal are sufficient to mitigate the identified impacts. * C. The City may deny a permit or approval for a proposal on the basis of SEPA so long as: 1. A finding is made that approving the proposal would result in probable significant adverse environmental impacts that are identified in a FEIS or final SEIS prepared pursuant to this Ordinance; and 2. A finding is made that there are no reasonable mitigation measures capable of being accomplished that are sufficient to mitigate the identified impact; and 3. The denial is based on one or more policies identified in subsection E of this Section and identified in writing in the decision document. * E. 1. The City designates and adopts by reference the following policies as the basis for the City exercise of authority pursuant to this Section: a. Fulfill the responsibilities of each generation as trustees of the environment for succeeding generations; b. Assure for all people of Washington productive, and esthetically and culturally pleasing surroundings. c. Attain the widest range of beneficial uses of the environment without degradation, risk to health or safety, or other undesirable and unintended consequences; d. Preserve important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our national heritage; e. Maintain, wherever possible, an environment which supports diversity and variety of individual choice; f. Achieve a balance between population and resource use which will permit high standards of living and a wide sharing of life' s amenities. 2. The legislature/City recognizes that each person has a fundamental and unalienable right to a healthful environment and that each person has a responsibility to contribute to the preservation and enhancement of the environment. WASHINGTON ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: WAC 197-11-030: Policy. Agencies shall to the fullest extent possible: * o Find ways to make the SEPA process more useful to the decisionmakers and the public, promote certainty regarding the requirements of the act, and emphasize important environmental impacts and alternatives. * o Prepare environmental documents that are supported by evidence that the necessary environmental analyses have been made. * o Encourage public involvement in decisions that significantly affect environmental quality. * o Identif evaluate, and req uire quire or implement reasonable alternatives that would mitigate adverse effects of proposed actions on the environment. * WAC 197-11-080: Incomplete or unavailable information. (2) When there are gaps in relevant information or scientific uncertainty concerning significant impacts, agencies shall make clear that such information is lacking or that substantial uncertainty exists. . . The agency shall weigh the need for the action with the severity of possible adverse impacts which would occur if the agency were to decide to proceed in the face of uncertainty. If the agency proceeds, it shall indicate its worst case analysis. Note: All objective data, attained through accepted scientific methods, show that the Blackriver Corporate Park project, if allowed proceed, will significantly impact the great blue heronry and fragile ecosystem that exists there. j Ii • GAHMKEN PRESS P.O. BOX 1467 NEWPORT, OR 97365 27 April 1990 Ms. Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner Department of Community Development 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Ms. Myer: Re: Black River Corporate Park Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). I have studied Great Blue Herons in the Pacific Northwest for a number of years and have published about a dozen papers in refereed, scientific journals about Great Blue Heron nesting and feeding biology (see Literature Cited at end of this letter). I have read the DEIS and am concerned about the inadequacy of the proposed guidelines to protect the affected Great Blue Heron colony. I urge that the following guidelines that are partially derived from the Washington Department of Wildlife Nongame Program (1988) guidelines given in the DEIS on p. B-11 be followed in the construction of the Black River Corporate Park: 1) No disturbance within 800-1,300 ft of the heron colonybe allowed during 9 the breeding season from January 15 through August 1. 2) No disturbance be allowed within 750 ft of the heron colony throughout the year. 3) Stands of trees at least 50 ft high and at least 10 acres in area should be preserved. My reasons for recommending these guidelines are on the following pages. Thank your for your time and consideration in considering my comments on the Black River DEIS. Yours, goMv..,19 . Range D. Bayer Page 1 of 8' pages of`Bayer's Comments on Black River Corporate Park DEIS No activity should be allowed near this Great Blue Heron colony after January 15. Few researchers have made observations at Pacific Northwest Great Blue Heron colonies before mid-February, but, at two colonies, some herons were present as early as January 28-30 (Trowbridge and Bayer In Press). Since Vos et al. (1985), who studied the effects of human disturbance on Great Blue Herons, concluded that disturbance should not be allowed near heron colonies after herons first arrive at a colony, activity within the buffer zone around the Black River colony should not be allowed after January 15 to minimize the risk of disturbing early nesting herons. Evidence that allowing human activity such as construction or land clearing near a Great Blue Heron colony in February is,detrimental is that construction work done near the Black River colony on 18 February 1987 resulted in the delayed fledging of Great Blue Herons (Murphy 1988). Further, an average of only 2.0 young per successful nest (i.e., a nest that fledged young) was fledged at the disturbed Black River colony in 1987 (Murphy 1988); this is less than the 2.2-3.4 young per successful nest found at other Great Blue Heron colonies in the Pacific Northwest (Henny and Bethers 1971, Werschkul et al. 1976, 1977; English 1978, Simpson and Kelsall 1978, Warren 1979, Trowbridge and Bayer In Press). The DEIS on p. B-5 suggests that Great Blue Herons will nest in small trees or shrubs if large trees are not available. While this can occur in some areas within the range of the Great Blue Heron, I know of no instance, and the DEIS gives no examples, of Great Blue Herons nesting in shrubs in western Washington or Oregon, so this is not currently a likely possibility in the King County area. The DEIS misleadingly suggests that Great Blue Herons can tolerate human activity near a heron colony. Human disturbance such as logging, construction, or repeated human intrusions into or near a heron colony during the breeding season can cause total abandonment of a Great Blue Heron colony (Mark 1976, Werschkul et al. 1976, English 1978, Kelsall and Simpson 1979, Forbes et al. 1983, Murphy 1988). Further, the authors of the DEIS have failed to mention that the mere presence of Great Blue Herons at a colony site does not mean that the colony is "viable" (see p. B-3, "Rookery Status" and p. B-7 in the DEIS). Herons can be present at a disturbed colony but if no young are fledged or if fewer young are produced than are necessary to maintain a stable population, then the heron population is not truly viable (i.e., self-sustaining). Herons, - - like gulls (Bayer 1983), can return each year to a disturbed site (especially when there are few nesting sites as in King County) even though their nesting success is poor. The case studies cited in the DEIS to show that Great Blue Herons tolerate nearby human disturbance are incomplete because the nesting success is not given for any of the sites. Disturbance can cause some Great Blue Herons to abandon their nests; for example, 90-93% of nests in - undisturbed colonies were active, which was significantly greater than in disturbed colonies (Werschkul et al. 1976, Simpson and Kelsall 1978) or than the 75% active nests observed in a disturbed colony studied by Webb and Forbes (1982). Although some Great Blue Herons that abandon their nests may renest, some have apparently abandoned nesting for the entire nesting season because of disturbance such as construction or land clearing (English 1978, Page 2 of 8 pages of Bayer's Comments on Black River Corporate Park DEIS • Simpson and Kelsall 1978). Other herons that abandon their nest and go elsewhere to nest will probably do so at a more distant heron colony and thus have reduced nesting success because herons typically nest near their foraging areas and if forced to nest farther from their foraging areas, they can have lower nesting success (e.g., Simpson et al. 1987). There are at least six examples where the nesting success of Great Blue Herons at disturbed colonies was lower than normal. As previously mentioned, the 2.0 young fledged per successful nest at the disturbed Black River colony in 1987 was less than that at other Great Blue Heron colonies. Second, Werschkul et al. (1976) found that the average Great Blue Heron fledging success of 2.20 young per successful nest at a disturbed colony was lower than in three out of four undisturbed Oregon Coast colonies. Third, Simpson and Kelsall (1978) found that, in 1978, the average of 2.06 young per successful nest at the Pender Harbour colony in British Columbia, where road construction and tree clearing for a housing development were occurring nearby, was less than the 2.6 average at an undisturbed colony; in 1979, when human disturbance at the Pender Harbour colony was reduced because the development was abandoned, the average number of young per successful nest increased markedly to 3.0 (Forbes et al. 1983:38, Simpson et al. 1987:576). Fourth, the 2.14 and 2.20 young fledged per successful nest in 1978 and 1979, respectively, at a colony in Idaho about 680 ft away from railroad tracks and about 1,320 ft away from a campground (Collazo 1979:4, 1981) was about 0.4-1.2 young per successful nest less than at a much less disturbed colony in Idaho studied in the same years (Warren 1979). Fifth, Webb and Forbes (1982) recorded a nesting success of 2.33 young per successful nest at a disturbed colony in British Columbia, which is comparable to the number of fledglings per successful nests at undisturbed colonies, but the proportion of abandoned nests was high at their colony, so that Great Blue Herons in their colony only fledged 1.75 young per nest, which is less than than found per nest or breeding pair at undisturbed Pacific Northwest colonies (Henny and Bethers 1971, English 1978). Sixth, and finally, a Great Blue Heron colony in Stanley Park in Vancouver, British Columbia is famous for being near ongoing human disturbance from passersby and is cited in the DEIS on p. B-7 as an example of a colony that has persevered with disturbance since 1921; however, the authors of the DEIS did not mention that this colony, perhaps because of disturbance, had moved at least twice since 1921 (Mark 1976:37, Forbes et al. 1983:48-49) and that the nesting. success at this colony in 1980 and 1981 was reduced to only 2.05 and 2.18 young per successful nest, respectively (Forbes et al. 1983:48). In summary, there is ample evidence that nesting success at some disturbed Great Blue Heron colonies is less than at undisturbed colonies. Disturbance such as construction or land clearing can lower nesting success by causing those Great Blue Herons that do not abandon nesting to leave their nests in haste (which can break eggs or knock young out of the nest) and expose their eggs or young to predators or inclement weather that may kill heron eggs or small young (e.g., Simpson and Kelsall 1978, Kelsall and Simpson 1979, Vos et al. 1985). Disturbance can also delay or impair nesting so that young fledge later and are smaller than average, so that their post-fledging survival may be much less than for fledglings from undisturbed colonies. The DEIS suggests that disturbed Great Blue Heron colonies are "viable," but this is misleading because the nesting success of disturbed Great Blue Herons can be less than necessary to maintain stable population numbers. Although Henny" (1972:33) estimated that 1.91 young per pair of Great Blue Page 3 of 8 pages of Bayer's Comments on Black River Corporate Park DEIS . Herons are necessary to maintain a stable population, he included data from birds reared and banded at National Wildlife Refuges, where Great Blue Herons evidently survive much better than elsewhere (Bayer 1981c). Bayer (1981c) estimated that herons reared north of 40 N latitude and away from National Wildlife Refuges would need to produce as many as 2.33 young per breeding pair to maintain a stable population. Since the number of young fledged per successful nest is 0.2-2.1 young greater than per breeding pair or per nest (Vermeer 1969, Henny and Bethers 1971, English 1978, Warren 1979, Collazo 1981, Webb and Forbes 1982), a minimum average of at least 2.11 young per successful nest (based on Henny 1972:33) or perhaps as many as 2.53 young per successful nest (based on Bayer 1981c) must be produced to maintain a stable population from non-National Wildlife Refuge colonies such as the Black River colony. The breeding success of 2.0 young per successful nest at the disturbed Black River colony in 1987 (Murphy 1988) is clearly below current best estimates of the reproductive success necessary to maintain .a truly viable (i.e., self-sustaining) heron population, and it is also questionable if the breeding success at some of the other disturbed colonies mentioned previously is adequate. On p. B-10, the DEIS misleadingly indicates that Great Blue Herons established and maintained colonies at sites of disturbance that was "obviously acceptable" to the herons. This conclusion is baseless for several reasons. First, the herons really may not have had any choice but to nest near the disturbance; if they nested farther away from their feeding areas, they may have had even lower nesting success (see Simpson et al. 1987). Second, Great Blue Herons indicate their displeasure with disturbance by moving their nests away from it. For example, at disturbed colonies, active nests were significantly farther away from disturbance than were inactive nests (Werschkul et al. 1976), and herons that abandoned their nests because of disturbance then built new nests at a disturbed colony farther away from the disturbance (Simpson and Kelsall 1978). Third, this DEIS fails to mention that the kinds of human disturbance have differed between their-exampl-es-of-disturbed colonies and that while Great Blue Herons can become habituated to some forms of human disturbance, they are less tolerant of others. The proposed Black River construction beginning on February 15 is a type of disturbance that could adversely affect Great Blue Herons because herons have sometimes responded to construction by abandoning their colony or nests and because herons are most sensitive to disturbance early in the nesting season (Vos et al. 1985) and herons can first arrive at their colonies in late January (Trowbridge and Bayer In Press). The DEIS implies that if a disturbed colony grows, then the colony is viable. This can be fallacious unless information about the nesting success at the disturbed colony or knowledge about the fate of surrounding colonies is available. For example, the DEIS indicates on p. B-8 that the number of nests at the Lake Sammamish State Park Great Blue Heron colony has increased; what the DEIS neglects to mention is that the growth of this colony may be because of the abandonment of a nearby colony at Weowna County Park (see Murphy 1988). There appears to be a shortage of available nesting sites for Great Blue Heron colonies in King County (see Murphy 1988), so herons are forced to nest in the few sites remaining, in spite of disturbance. In summary, since the DEIS fails to give the nesting success at any of the disturbed colonies cited as examples of herons tolerating human disturbance, the DEIS' conclusion that disturbed Great Blue Heron colonies are "viable" is inappropriate and questionable. On the contrary, there is Page 4 of 8.pages of Bayer's Comments on Black River Corporate Park DEIS r 1 ample evidence that some forms of human disturbance, including construction, can hurt heron nesting success. The distance guidelines of the Washington Department of Wildlife (WDW) to eliminate disturbance around a Great Blue Heron colony are reasonable and should be followed. The WDW has undoubtedly spent time and care in determining their guidelines, which (in my opinion) contrasts to the sometimes sloppy preparation of the DEIS' Appendix B (see below). The WDW's recommended buffer zone of 800-1,300 ft around a Great Blue Heron colony that is cited in the DEIS on p. B-11 is reasonable because Buckley and Buckley (1976) recommended that there should be a buffer zone of 1,000 ft around colonial nesting waterbird colonies. Further, the average distance between active nests and disturbance was 718 ft at one Great Blue Heron colony (Werschkul et al. 1976). Additionally, Short and Cooper (1985) and Vos et al. (1985) both recommend that a buffer zone of 820 ft on land and 492 ft on water be maintained to avoid human disturbance. The case studies in the DEIS that are given to indicate that herons can tolerate human disturbance at closer distances are either for less obtrusive disturbances than the construction proposed for the Black River Project or for disruptive disturbances that may not have occurred during the Great Blue Heron's breeding season. Using the Black River Great Blue Heron colony as an example, construction in February definitely disturbed the heron's nesting in 1987 (Murphy 1988). On p. B-7 of the DEIS, it is stated that Taylor and Reshkin (1981) (which should actually be Taylor et al. 1981) concluded that • . . recreational activities during the nesting season could be allowed within 575 feet of the nesting rookery." This DEIS' statement is erroneous; Taylor et al. (1981) actually recommended that limited recreational use be no closer than 574 ft (175 m) of the heron colony. The DEIS correctly interpets Taylor et al.'s (1981) guideline on p. B-11. The proposed Black River_Corporate.Park- would involve a more intense form of human disturbance than the limited recreational use considered by Taylor et al (1981), so Taylor et al.'s (1981) buffer zone of 574 ft and, certainly, the 400 ft buffer zone proposed for Tract B of the Black River development (p. B-14 of the DEIS) could be inadequate to maintain a truly viable (i.e., self- sustaining) heron population at the Black River colony. In my opinion, parts of the DEIS' Appendix B were hastily written with inadequate care. The sloppiness in the writing of Appendix B indicates to me that the proposed guidelines in Appendix B may not have been thoughtfully _ enough researched and are inadequate. The sloppiness of Appendix B preparation is apparent in the following items, which are by no means all the errors in Appendix B: 1) p. 6-2: Erickson (pers. comm.) and Alimendinger letter are not given in the "Literature Cited" or "Personal Communications." 2) p. B-4: Contrary to what is written, Lowe (1954) contains no information about the Great Blue Heron; Lowe (1954) is about a different species, the Gray Heron. 3) p. B-4: It is not true that any of the references that are cited as Doctoral dissertations are really Doctoral dissertations. In fact, only one of the four references cited is a Thesis at all ! 4) p. B-4: The Milner pers. comm. is not listed in the "Personal Communications" at the end of Appendix B. Page 5 of 8 pages of Bayer's Comments on Black River Corporate Park DEIS i . 5) p. B-4: Two references, Mark (1975) and Henny (1971), are not given in the "Literature Cited" at the end of Appendix B. 6) p. B-4; There is no Cottrille (1958) in. the "Literature Cited" at the end of Appendix B; this should have been Cottrille and Cottrille (1958). 7) p. B-5: Henny (1971) is not in the "Literature Cited" at the end of 8) p. AB p6 ndTx B. here is no Simpson et al. (1987) in the "Literature Cited" at the end of Appendix B; however, there is a Simpson and Webb (1987), which is presumably what is meant here. "Et al." properly refers to three or more authors. 9) p. B-7: Two references, Webb and Forbes (1982) and Taylor and Reshkin (1981), are not given in the "Literature Cited" at the end of Appendix B. Further, Taylor and Reshkin (1981) is an incorrect citation because there were actually three authors (see Taylor et al. 1981 in the Literature Cited at the end of this letter). 10) p. B-8: Webb and Forbes (1982) is not in the "Literature Cited" at the end of Appendix B. 11) p. B-9: R. W. Thorpe and Associates (1985) is not in the "Literature Cited" at the end of Appendix B. 12) p. B-10: Webb and Forbes (1982) is not in the "Literature Cited" at the end of Appendix B. 13) p. B-11: City of Seattle (1986) and Taylor and Reshkin (1981) are not given in the "Literature Cited" at the end of Appendix B. 14) p. B-12: No explanation is given of who the "WDE" is. 15) p. B-15: The full citations for Bjorklund (1975) and Cottam and Uhler (1945) are not given. 16) p. B-15: There is no such word as "Fynamics." 17) p. B-15 and B-16: References are not in alphabetical or chronological order (i.e., Palmer 1962 on p. B-15 belongs after Murphy 1988 on p. B-16; Van Wormer 1987 should be before Van Wormer 1988). 18) p. B-16: Typographical errors such as "Auccess" and "Ler-txchuh--are inexcusable. 19) p. B-16: Short and Cooper 1985 is listed twice. 20) p. B-16: The Simpson and Webb reference is incorrectly cited; there are actually 3 authors: Simpson, Smith, and Kelsall ; but no Webb. 21) Throughout Appendix B, Great Blue Heron nesting "rookeries" are referenced; however, Great Blue Herons do not nest in "rookeries." Only the Rook of Europe nests in rookeries. It is more proper to write that Great Blue Herons nest in heronries or colonies. Literature Cited Bayer, R. D. 1978. Aspects of an Oregon estuarine Great Blue Heron population. Pp. 213-217 in A. Sprunt IV, J. C. Ogden, and S. Wi nckl er (eds.). Wading Birds. Nat. Audubon Soc. Res. Rep. No. 7. Bayer, R. D. 1979a. Bald Eagle-Great Blue Heron interactions. Murrelet 60:32-33. Bayer, R. D. 1979b. Great Blue Heron attacks Horned Grebe. Bird-Banding 50:264-265. Bayer, R. D. 1981a. Arrival and departure frequencies of Great Blue Herons at two Oregon estuarine colonies. Auk 98:589-595. Bayer, R. D. 1981b. Great Blue Herons "mousing" in western Oregon. Murrelet ;., Page 6 of 8 pages of Bayer's Comments on Black River Corporate Park DEIS ' I 62:91. Bayer, R. D. 1981c. Regional variation of Great Blue Heron longevity. J. Field Ornithol. 52:210-213. Bayer, R. D. 1981d. Weights of Great Blue Herons at the Yaquina Estuary, Oregon. Murrelet 62:18-19. Bayer, R. D. 1982. Great Blue Heron eggshell thickness at Oregon estuaries. Wilson Bull, 94:198-201. Bayer, R. D. 1983. Nesting success of Western Gulls at Yaquina Head and on man-made structures in Yaquina Estuary, Oregon. Murrelet 64;87-91. Bayer, R. D. 1984a. Foraging ground displays of Great Blue Herons at Yaquina Estuary, Oregon. Colonial Waterbirds 7:45-54. Bayer, R. D. 1984b. Vocalizations of Great Blue Herons at Yaquina Estuary, Oregon. Colonial Waterbirds 7:35-44. Bayer, R. D. 1985a. Bill length of herons and egrets as an estimator of prey size. Colonial Waterbirds 8:104-109. Bayer, R. D. 1985b. Interactions of Great Blue Herons and gulls. Wilson Bull. 97:538-541. Bayer, R. D. 1989. Great Blue Heron killed by striking an overhead power line at Coos Bay, Oregon. Oregon Birds 15:197-198. Bayer, R. D. and E. McMahon. 1981. Colony sizes and hatching synchrony of Great Blue Herons in coastal Oregon. Murrelet 62:73-79. Buckley, P. A. and F. G. Buckley. 1976. Guidelines for protection and management of colonially nesting waterbirds. North Atlantic National Park Service, Regional Office, Boston, Mass. (I have not seen this reference; I have relied on comments about this paper in Taylor et al. [1981] and on p. B-11 of the DEIS.) ' Collazo, J. A. 1979. Breeding biology and food habits of the Great Blue Heron at Heyburn State Park, Benewah County, Idaho. M.S. Thesis, Univ. Idaho, Moscow. Collazo, J. A. 1981. Some aspects of the breeding ecology of the Great Blue Heron at Heyburn State Park. Northwest Science 55:293-297. English, S. M. 1978. Distribution and ecology of Great Blue Heron colonies on the Willamette River, Oregon. Pp. 235-244--i n A. Sprunt-IV, J. C. Ogden, and S. Wi nckl er (eds.). Wading Birds. Nat. Audubon Soc. Res. Rep. No. 7. Forbes, L. S., K. Simpson, J. P. Kelsall , and D. R. Flook. 1983. Great Blue Heron colonies in British Columbia. Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service, Pacific and Yukon Region, Delta, British Columbia. Henny, C. J. 1972. An analysis of the population dynamics of selected avian species with special reference to changes during the modern pesticide era. U. S. Dept. Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Wildlife Research Report No. 1. Henny, C. J. and M. R. Bethers. 1971. Population ecology of the Great Blue Heron with special reference to western Oregon. Can. Field. Nat. 83:205-209. Kelsall , J. P. and K. Simpson. 1979. A three year study of the Great Blue Heron in southwestern British Columbia. Proc. 1979 Colonial Waterbird Group 3:69-74. Lowe, F. A. 1954. The [Gray] Heron. London, Collins. Mark, D. M. 1976. An inventory of Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias) nesting colonies in British Columbia. Northwest Science 50:32-41. Murphy, M. 1988. Status of Great Blue Heron colonies in King County, Washington. Western Birds 19:37-40. Short, H. L. and R. J. Cooper. 1985. Habitat suitability index models: Great Blue Heron. U.S. Dept. Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Div. Biological Services, Biological Report 82 (10.99) July 1985. Page 7 of 8 pages of Bayer's Comments on Black River Corporate Park DEIS • Simpson, K. and J. P. Kelsall. 1978. Capture and banding of adult Great Blue Herons at Pender Harbour, British Columbia. Proc. Colonial Waterbird Group 1978:71-78. Simpson, K., J. N. M. Smith, and J. P. Kelsall. 1987. Correlates and consequences of coloniality in Great Blue Herons. Can. J. Zool. 65:572-577. Taylor, T. M., M. Reshkin, and K. J. Brock. 1981. Recreation land use adjacent to an active heron rookery: a management study. Proc. Indiana Academy of Sciences 91:226-236. Trowbridge, E. M. and R. D. Bayer. In Press. A 1-3 nest Great Blue Heron colony near Neskowin, Tillamook County, Oregon. Oregon Birds. Vermeer, K. 1969. Great Blue Heron colonies in Alberta. Can. Field-Nat. 83:237-242. Vos, D. K., R. A. Ryder, and W. D. Graul. 1985. Response of breeding Great Blue Herons to human disturbance in northcentral Colorado. Colonial Waterbirds 8:13-22. Warren, N. M. 1979. Ecology of Great Blue Herons on Silver. Creek, Idaho. M. S. Thesis, Univ. Idaho, Moscow. Washington Department of Wildlife. 1988. Draft, recommended management guidelines for Washington Endangered and Threatened Species and Species of Concern--Great Blue Heron. Nongame Wildlife. (I have not seen this document; however, some of this report's recommended guidelines are given on p. B-11 of the Black River DEIS.) Webb, R. S. and L. S. Forbes. 1982. Colony establishment in an urban site by Great Blue Herons. Murrelet 63:91-92. Werschkul, D. F., E. McMahon, and M. Leitschuh. 1976. Some effects of human activities on the Great Blue Heron in Oregon. Wilson Bull. 88:660-662. Werschkul , D. F., E. McMahon, M. Leitschuh, S. English, C. Skibinski, and G. Williamson. 1977. Observations on the reproductive ecology of the Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias) in western Oregon. Murrelet 58:7-12. Page 8 of 8 pages of Bayer's Comments on Black River Corporate Park DEIS 1 COMMENTS ON THE BLACKWA1 ER CORPORATE PARK DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT OF APRiL , 1990 by John P. Kelsall , Ph .D. , k .P.Bio. 22 Deerfield Drive Delta , British Columbia Canada . V4M 2W9 • Introduction My comments on the Blackwater Corporate Park draft environmental statement are confined to those portions where I have some experience and expertise. They are those sections of the main report dealing with plants and animals and , particularly, with "Appendix B - Life history and effects of human disturbance on great blue heron rookeries" . Because I have not visited the site, my review is concerned only with the technical accuracy and adequacy of what is said in the EIS. I do not comment specifically on proposed mitigation measures or alternative plans because, in my opinion , the biological baseline is inadequate for such considerations . • A strong first impression was that the EIS appears to accept the • corporate park development as virtually a foregone conclusion - • that the only decisions remaining are those of how best to provide for the retention of some habitat and wildlife around.__,:.the_ ._ _ peripheries of the site . The heron colony and P-1 pond are the only • wildlife values given more than superficial consideration , and the corporate park design is modified, perhaps only slightly, to lessen - impacts on them. A "no action" alternative is mentioned in ' connection with each section of the development , but is nowhere seriously discussed . No information is given on the importance of • the existing site to local wildlife, to the local environment , or to the quality of lite in Renton . What is planned for the residual riparian forest adjacent to - the site? From the scant information supplied, it seems that the corporate park site may supply some wild land that complements the residual forest by adding considerable biological diversity. • Deficiencies in the EIS The most serious, immediately apparent , deficiency in the • environmental impact statement is • the absence of biological inventory. Biological inventory is usually the first , basic , and • necessary step when making an environmental assessment . It is difficult to imagine attempting biological description of an area without first knowing what is there, but that is exactly what the Blackwater Corporate Park draft attempts to do. There are no lists • 2 of plants , amphibians , reptiles , birds, or mammals . Scientific nomenclature is not given for the few species that are specifically rnent:ioned in the text . Vegetative habitat components are mentioned, but only in qualitative, rather than quantitative, fashion . From • the text , it appears that biological investigations on the ground may have been limited to a single field trip - "the field visit in mid-June" (p. 3-31 ) , although "field visits" are referred to (p. B4) _in connection with the heronry in Appendix B. The text , particularly "3. 5. 1 Vegetation" and "3 . 5. 3 Wildlife Resources" , is full of qualifiers that reinforce an impression that there was no on-site description of current biota . Such phrases as • "Species such as Timoth "y . . .are present an extensive shrub zone characterized primarily of red alder and black cottonwood" , " trees of approximately 100 to 130 feet in height" , "Species such as red • alder" , "it is likely that predators use these wetland areas" , "wildlife most likely to utilize the site include" , "Waterfowl , . .may nest" , do not lend confidence that the authors had more than a superficial idea of what they were writing about . In general , plants .and plant associations are described somewhat . better than the animals . The authors at least knew the colloquial names of a number of grasses, herbaceous plants , shrubs, and trees . The reader gets a reasonable idea of the sorts of vegetative, associations that will be lost -with development of the site, but ___ no idea of the importance of that loss to the surrounding environment , ___Referenee is _.made to a dozen or so bird species, although it is not clear if they were seen by the investigators, or are merely . mentioned as being possible occupants of the site. - A few mammals are mentioned by name as well, but again with no certain indication that they were identified through on-site • investigation . One would like to know what the investigators mean - when -they say "Few mammals, other than mice, voles , and adaptable • predators such as racoons, striped skunks, and opossums will be sustained. " What are the mammals that , through inference, will not be sustained? For that matter what species of voles and mice are • they talking about , and in what numbers? There are some rare and interesting voles and mice in the Pacific 'northwest , and. there are • also some extremely common ones that provide much food for predators, including great blue herons. Are there shrews, moles, • other small species, or other large species, present? Things are even less clear with the "amphibians and reptiles" . No ------ -.--- -- amphibians or reptiles are named. Insects are not considered at ' all . I would. like to have some assurance that the site is not ecologically important to a larger area, and that it does not - - contain rare or endangered life forms . No such assurance can be . i 3 given or int.er. r•ed from the EIS as it stands . The engineering aspects of the Environmental. Impact Statement may be well done and thorough . They include some hard data , and appear to have some substance, but I am not qualified to judge them. I can state, however , that , excepting some aspects of Appendix B, the biological. aspects of the environmental statement are simplistic and superficial in the extreme. Appendix B and the great blue heron nesting colony The description and discussion of the great blue heron colony, adjacent to the Blackwater Corporate Park site, is surprisingly limited, considering the prominence given to it in the EIS . Biological data relating to it appear to be almost entirely derived from unpublished reports and conversgtions . The colony is not well described . We are told that the nests are in a grove of "140 to 150 foot tall" black cottonwoods . We are not told the number or extent of trees used for nesting, the heights of the nests above ground, the condition or viability of the nesting grove, or the condition and composition of the •subcanopy vegetation . We are not told what disturbances the nesting herons are subject to now. We ar•e not told if there are alternate nesting sites in the local area, in the event that development for the corporate park should cause abandonment of the heronry. We are not _ told_. why __. . —the herons established themselves where they have. Were they perhaps displaced from some known previous site? 'My second hand information, slightly different from that given in the EIS, is that • the colony has had progressively increasing numbers of nests — from 3 in 1986' to over 30 in 1990 (S.. Krom, personal communication) . • That suggests a reasonably secure, undisturbed, and increasingly important nesting site. The EIS :Lacks , or is less than precise on , some basic information concerning the heronry . Where, and on what , do the nesting herons feed? Do they use the adjacent park and pond site, or do they go further afield? Feeding locations are determined by the simple . process of observing the directions of feeding flights, and following those flights to their sources. The finding of feeding locations may be simplified by determining what the birds are eating . That determination is often made by examining foodstuffs commonly dropped over the sides of active nests . Colonies often • have more than one feeding area . Have those matters been investigated? The EIS plans heron flight corridors between buildings in the corporate park, but it does not indicate that those corridors are ones that the herons actually use. In fact the EIS is vague on that point . If the buildings will be in the direct - and commonly used flight paths of feeding herons, their impact will i • be much greater than if they arc not . It- would also be useful to see consideration of the elevation of the heron " s nests in relation to that of the planned buildings . One would suspect , although I know of no directly confirming data , that buildings that overlook nests would have a much greater impact than ones below nest level . We know how high the planned buildings will be . Relative to them, how high are the nests? Will the roofs of the buildings have human activity areas? It is not evident , from the EIS, what configuration for buildings and parking is most likely in the planned corporate park. The plans shown in "Appendix B" are not the same as those shown in the main body of . the work . Considering the huge size of outdoor parking shown on some of the diagrams, it seems surprising that the authors did not attempt to analyze the effect of car park activity on nesting herons . What about night time activity in the corporate park? Herons may make feeding flights day and night . The authors have done a commendable job of locating selective references, particularly from the northwest , that demonstrate that • herons may maintain colonies despite much environmental disturbance . Their data show, however, that such colonies are almost invariably small . The average number of active nests in the 6 colonies shown on their Table B-1 is 18 .6, with. a range from 0 � to 50. That is about half average colony size for the province of + British Columbia , and some other venues examined (Kelsall 1989, Forbes et al . 1985a) . The instability of such small colonies is demonstrated by the fact -. that they are short lived. Table B-1 shows no record for any of the colonies prior to 1985, and the text suggests no significantly . longer history for any of them. By contrast , large colonies, in large and secure acreages are known , if only through oral tradition , to be long lived. For example, a colony of upward to 200 nests in . Tsawwassen , British Columbia, that was destroyed by logging in 1955; had been at the same forested site since the turn of the century, and probably long before that . Urban development forced it to move several times in the next 18 years . It relocated . about 1973 in a forest of several hundred acres in Point Roberts, Washington , where it now has +345 active nests per year. Large colonies are also more productive than small ones, fledging more young per nest . It is believed that some small colonies might not • produce enough young to maintain themselves without recruitment form nearby larger colonies (see Forbes et al . 1985a , Forbs et al . 1985b, Kelsall 1989 , Butler 1989) . The authors should qualify their repeated use of the Stanley Park heronry in Vancouver, and the Delta River Inn heronry in Richmond (not Vancouver) , B . C . as examples of tolerance to vehicular and human traffic . The Stanley Park colony indeed tolerates much human , and some vehicular traffic . However, it should be noted that it has • had 60 years of progressively greater disturbance in which to condition . It has not been remarkably successful despite having excellent nest trees and room to move around , extensive feeding habitat , and virtually no avian predation . The Delta River Inn heronry, in a noisy and busy site , is a real anomaly . however, the trees involved provide the only feasible nest sites in an extremely rich feeding area near Vancouver airport . Theoretically there is room for many nests . In fact , only a few birds (3 nests in 1990) tenaciously hang on there (Scott Forbes , personal communication) . That heronry is not viable in the usual sense of the word, and certainly not something to be emulated at Blackriver. There are some oddities in the summarized data relating to small heronries in Table B-3 . First , the distances between human activities and "Rookeries" ( in my dictionary rookeries are for rooks , Corvus fugile_gus , although the term is sometimes applied to places where seals and penguins haul out of the water) are obviously rough approximations . Curiously, the approximations used in the table are often different from those used in the accompanying descriptive text . The discrepancies are sufficiently frequent and divergent as to make all the given distances suspect . Stranger still is the status rating given for two of the heronries in Table L3-1 . What were the criteria by which the Pigeon Point heronry, that had only 16 nests in 1986, none in 1987 or 1988, and whose current status is unknown , was judged to be "viable"? Its viability seems to be most uncertain from the data given . The Spencer Property heronry, with only 6 nests in 1988 and no subsequent data , surely has unknown, rather than "viable" , status . . The authors appear to have selectively ignored a substantial literature suggesting that persistence of heron nesting in disturbed sites is an exception rather than a rule. The corporate park development will certainly impact the adjacent heronry, perhaps even cause its abandonment , despite suggested safeguards . Werschkul et al . ( 1976) , whom they cite, observed that heron nests within 486 ' ( 148 m) of a logging operation were inactive. While nests 719 ' ( 219. m) from . the logging were active, birds were shifting nests to the side of the colony distal from the disturbance . Simpson and Kelsall ( 1978) compared two similar heron colonies, one severely impacted by development of a housing subdivision nearby. Toward the end of the breeding season in 1978 , 88% of nests in the undisturbed colony were active, but only 27% of those exposed to development were still viable . The disturbed colony was abandoned by the birds the following year. Corbett et al . ( 1985) described a classic case where a large heronry of • perhaps 200 years staridi.ng was abandoned following progressive human_ intrusion over a period of 30 years . Some of the factors were construction of a causeway to the island site, progressive enlargement of encroaching camping and parking facilities and, finally, confinement of the heronry to unsuitable coniferous forest where herons killed many nest trees with their excrement before -- - finally abandoning the site. Examples of herons abandoning nest 6 sites due to disturbance are legion . • Vos et al . ( 198b) experimentally examined the reaction of nesting herons to disturbance by humans, and may have produced the most definitive study to date. They found, and other authors agree, that herons are less tolerant of disturbance early in the nesting cycle ( i .e. during courtship, nest building, egg laying, and early incubation ) than they are later in the season . Visibly disturbed . by an intruder at an average of 560 ' ( 170 m) in March, they tolerated intrusion to within 165' to 210' (50 to 65 m) for the • balance of the season . Like most other authors on the subject , Vos • et al . believed that herons may be considerably disturbed well before they actually provide overt evidence by flushing from the . nest . Their recommendations for a buffer zone around heronries was 820 ' (2b0 m) , the greatest distance at which herons were flushed from the nest by an intruder, plus 164 ' (50 m) as a safety margin . Most recent recommendations for the protection of heronries suggest 1 ,000 ' ( 300 m) as a zone within which there will be no disturbance of any sort during the nesting season . The most comprehensive, recent guidelines., of which I am aware, are those of Bowman . and Siderius ( 1984) for the Province of Ontario. The, Washington State Department of Game draft management guidelines fo heronries, cited , . in the EIS, are alone in recommending a 656' (200 m) buffer zone. , - In leaving much to the discretion of biologists _when recommending . buffer zones, they' forget that few biologists have- experience or knowledge of the needs of nesting herons. The +340 nest Point Roberts colony has come perilously close to destruction, and may • yet go. .because a state biologist apparently did not thoroughly - investigate existing and planned encroachments on the nesting area - -- - ' • (see. Kelsail 1989) . Literature references I frequently edit draft manuscripts for technical journals, including .the journal of Mammalogy, Journal of Wildlife Management , • Canadian Journal of Zoology, and Wildlife Society Bulletin , and for book publishers , consulting companies, and the Canadian Wildlife Service. It is rare, in my experience, to see literature citations handled as carelessly as they are in Appendix B of the Blackwater - Corporate Park draft . If a structure is no stronger than its weakest-link, the Blackwater Corporate Park EIS is hanging by a thread! • The following citations given in the. text , figures, and Table B-1 of Appendix B are not given in the "Literature,_Cited" . There may - - • • ij be others that I did not note , in passing . City of Seattle 1986 - Table B-1 , p. B-11 Cottrille 1958 - p. B-4 llenny 1971 - p. B-5 7 fienny 19'72 - p . 8-4 LPN , Inc . 1988 - Figs . 2 and 3 . Mark 1975 - p . 8-4 R.W. Thorpe and Associates 1985 - p. B-9 Simpson et al . 1987 - p. 8-6 Taylor and Reshkin 1981 - p. B-7, B-11 Van Wormer 1989 - Table B-1 Webb and Forbes 1982 - p. B. 7, B-8, B-10 In addition the following anomalies were noted in the "Literature Cited" . ----- "Short and Co oper. 1985. " are, given twice . "Simpson , K. and J .N.M. Webb. 1987. " is not a bona fide reference. It may be a - confusion of papers published by Webb and Forbes ( 1982 ) , and by Simpson , Smith, and Kelsall ( 1987) given in my literature citations below. I may have missed them, but I did not see "fienny and Bethers . 1971 . " or" U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1987. " cited in the text . Some . of, the references given are incompletely cited. Four of the last five literature references for example, on ' page B-16, provide _ author, date of publication , title, and pagination only. They give only indirect indications of where they, might .be found, thus thwartingthe essential purpose of literature, citations,_. which_ is. .. : . to allow a reader to look things up personally. Conclusions Since the developers of the Blackwater Corporate , Park are clearly playing brinksmanship with the Renton heronry; and possibly with. : • other ecological values as well, it is reasonable to expect that . any environmental assessment of the site should be systematic and comprehensive. Unfortunately, the biological considerations in the draft Environmental impact Assessment are inadequate and flawed . They should he upgraded to reasonable professional, standards. For example, they should be acceptable to a panel of professional . biologists in relevant fields, using the same sort of. criteria that . apply to peer-edited technical publications - ' - Literature cited abov e e Bowman , I . and J. Siderius .-- 1984. Management' guidelines- for the protection of heronries in Ontario: Ontario Ministry of { Natural Resources, Wildlife Branch , Toronto. 44 p. Butler, R .W. 1989. Breeding ecology and population trends of the great- blue heron, Ardea herodias fannini ,--in the Strait- of - • Georgia . in : Vermeer, K. and R.W. Butler (eds . ) . Ecology and status of marine and shoreline birds in the Strait of Georgia. Proceedings of a symposium sponsored by the Pacific Northwest - Bird and Mammal Society and the Canadian Wildlife Service. Canadian Wildlife Service, Special Report : 112-119. Corbett , G.N. , K. Robinson , and C. Roberts. 1985. A review of the Rustico island heronry in Prince Edward Island National Park. Parks Canada, Atlantic Region , Natural Resource Management Planning, Technical Report (with Ammendments) . 34 p. • Forbes, . L. S. , K. Simpson, J.P. Kelsall , and D. Flook. 1985a. Great blue heron colonies in British Columbia. Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service, Delta . 78 p. • Forbes, L.S. , K. Simpson , J.P. Kelsall , and D. Flook. 1985b. Reproductive success of great blue herons in British Columbia . Canadian Journal of Zoology 63(5) : 1110-1113. - Kelsall , J .P. 1989. The great blue herons of Point Roberts Prepared for lihistory, biology, and management . Point Roberts Heron Preservation Committee, Point Roberts, WA (unpublished 1, . report ) . 32 p. II � Simpson; K. and J.P. Kelsall . 1978. Capture and banding of- great_ . - - blue herons at Pender Harbour, British Columbia. Proceedings of the Colonial Waterbird Group 2 :71-78. Simpson , K. , J.N.M. Smith, and J.P. Kelsall . 1987. Correlates and consequences of . coloniality in great blue . herons. Canadian • Journal of Zoology 65: 572-577. Vos D.K. , R.A. Ryder, and W.D. Graul . 1985. Response of breeding t 9real . blue heron s to human . disturbance: in northcentral Colorado. Colonial Waterbirds 8(1 ) :13-22. Webb, R.S. and L.S. Forbes. 1982 . Colony establishment in an urban site by great blue herons . Murrelet 6 -3(3) : 91 92. Werschkul , D. , E. McMahon, M. Leitschuh, S. English, C. Skibinski , and C. Williamson . 1977. Observations on the reproductive • • ecology of the great blue heron (Ardea herodias) in western , _. Oregon . Murrelet 58(1 ) :7-12. • John P. Kelsall April 24, 1990 . Resume of JOHN P. KELSALL 22 Deerfield Drive Delta, British Columbia Canada. V4M 2W9 Telephones (604) 943-8763 Occupational Objective Consulting assignments in any aspect of renewable resource use or research where my education and experience can be used to advantage. Experience Highlights 1981 to President, Kelsall Research Ltd. Consulting in date. Delta, ecological research, review and resource B.C. management for various clients including the Banff Centre School of Management, Beak Consultants Ltd, LGL Ltd, Environcon Ltd, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Northwest Territories Department of Renewable Resources, National Parks Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service, and The World Wildlife Fund. 1968 to 1980 Research Scientist 2 to Research Scientist-4:= - Delta. B.C. , Ret d, December 1980. Directed and reported Edmonton. research on great blue heron ecology, and Alta. , and environmental assessments of National Wildlife Nanaimo, areas and reserves. Developed a curriculum and B.C. school in Renewable Resources Technology for the Northwest Territories; the first class graduated in 1979. Developed, directed and reported research toward learning geographic origins of birds from their feather chemistry. Designed, conducted and collaborated on major studies ofnorthern wildfire ecology and _ . -- adaptions of large mammals for life in snow. Studied and reported the ecology of 3 IBP ' sites and a proposed National Park in the North. Presented papers or otherwise represented employer, the Canadian Wildlife Service, at many national and international meetings, 1948-1959. 1965 to 1968 Research Manager 1, Biologist 5. Directed the Edmonton, research program for Western Region, Canadian Alta. Wildlife Service. Responsible for all research in the western National Parks and Arctic, and cooperative programs in the 4 western provinces. Acting Director of the Western Region through 1967. Left management because of a preference for research. page 1 of 3 19591965 to Biologist 3. Educational leave in Australia Perth, 1959-60. Research biologist for eastern Australia, National Parks. Pioneered studies of behaviour Ottawa, Ont. and morphological adaptions of moose and deer and for snow and investigated factors involved in Sackville, widespread "moose sickness" in eastern North N.B. America. 1948 to 1959 Technical Officer 3, Biologist 3. For Canadian Ottawa, Ont. , Wildlife Service, led research on barren- Vancouver, ground caribou 1950-59. Developed new B.C. and techniques for biological research under arctic Yellowknife, conditions. Made short term investigations, N. W.T. from Alaska to Greenland, involving beaver, arctic fox, musk-oxen and other life forms. Reported many new records for plants, birds and mammals. Educational leave 1950-51. Education Ph.D. in Zoology. University of Western Australia, 1965. Post graduate studies in Ecology. University of.. Ottawa, 1960-61. Post graduate studies in Wildlife Management. University of British Columbia, 1951-52. M.A. in Bionomics. University of Toronto, 1949.— _..__ - . B.A. in Biology. Acadia University, 1947. Completed courses in Field Geology and Mineralogy, 1954 and Intermediate Government . Administration, 1965. Professional American Society of Mammalogists Affiliations Arctic Institute of North America (Fellow) Association of Professional Biologists of British Columbia (past Director) Canadian Paraplegic Association International Oceanographic Foundation Ottawa Field-Naturalists Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada Pacific Northwest Bird and Mammal Society (past Canadian Vice President) The Wildlife Society (Certified Wildlife Biologist) Biblioaravhy Authored, or coauthored, 72 publications and many unpublished reports, mostly dealing with - ___.. . _ original research but including research and managementplans, environmental impact assessments, bibliographies and administrative documents. Won The Wildlife Society's award for best monograph in 1968 for "The migratory barren-ground caribou of Canada" ; runner-up for the same award in 1958. Wrote and read 48 radio page 2 of 3 ' R Bibliographv broadcasts for the Canadian Broadcasting contd. Corporation, 1969 to 1971. Personal - Photography, creative writing, reading, world Interests travel, northern history and ecology, swimming, collecting Canadiana. Personal Born .30 September 1924. Canadian Citizen. Data Married, 3 children. Height 183 cm. Weight 84 kg. Wear glasses. Service with the Royal Canadian Air Force, 1944-45; pensioner. Physical Limitations Physically limited by spastic paralysis of the legs. Upper body and arms unaffected. Can drive vehicles with hand controls, travel locally or internationally if required. Assistance required when faced with physical barriers to a wheelchair. Health otherwise satisfactory. References . References and a detailed bibliography on request. October 21, 1986. r. Page 3 of 3 BIBLIOGRAPHY John P. Kelsall .• . -October, 1980 • Publications - KELSALL, J.P. 1949. A study of bird populations in the apple orchards of the Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia, with particular reference to the effects of orchard sprays upon them. Can. Wildl. Serv. , Wildl. Manage. Bull. 1, Series 2. (M.A. thesis, U. of Toronto) 69 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1953. Caribou calving studies, 1951. Arctic Circular 6(1) : 6 - 7. KELSALL, J.P. 1953. Biological investigations of the Thelon Game Sanctuary. Arctic Circular 6(1) :7 - 8. KELSALL, J.P. 1953. Barren-ground caribou movements in the Canadian Arctic. Trans. 20th N. Am. Wild1. Conf. :551 - 560. BANFIELD, A.W.F., FLOOK, D.R., KELSALL, J.P. and LOUGHREY, A.G. 1955. An aerial survey technique for northern big game. Trans. 20th N. Am. Wildl. Conf. :519 - 532. - *_KELSALL, J.P. 1957. Continued barren-ground caribou studies. Can. Wildl. . Serv. , Wildl. Manage. Bull. 12, Series 1. 148 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1957. The barren-ground caribou cooperative investigation 1957-58. Rept. No. 1. Can. Wildl. Serv. 12 p. KELSALL, J.P. and LOUGHREY, A. G. 1957. The barren-ground caribou cooper- ative investigation. Rept. _ No. 2. Can. Wilda. Serv. 51p. `,. KELSALL, J.P. 1958. The barren-ground caribou cooperative investigation. . :. Rept. No. 3. Can. Wildl. Serv. 22 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1959. A poisonous fungusin the Northwest Territories. Can. Field-Nat. 73 (2) :130. - KELSALL, J.P. 1960. Co-operative studies of barren-ground caribou, 1957- 58. Can. Wildl. Serv. , Wildl. Manage. Bull. 15, Series 1. KELSALL, J.P. , LOUGHREY, A.G. and STEWART, R.C. 1960. Arctic expert test.' North 7(6) :17-20. . MACPHERSON, A.H. , HARINGTON, C.R. , and KELSALL, J.P. 1962. The barren- ground grizzly bear in northern Canada. Arctic 15(4) : 294-298. * One of three finalists for The Wildlife Society award for "the out- standing publication on wildlife ecology and management" in 1957. 2. KELSALL, J.P. 1963. Barren-ground caribou and their management. Can. Audubon,' Nov. - Dec. : 144 - 149. • KELSALL, J.P. 1963. Review of "Land and fresh-water mammals of the Ungava Peninsula" by Francis Harper. J. Wildl. Manage. 27(2) : 304-305. KELSALL, J.P. 1964. The decline of the caribou. Oryx 7(5) : 204-246. . KELSALL, J.P. 1965. Insular variability in the tammar (Protemnodon eugenii) of Western Australia. Ph.D. thesis, U. of West. Aust. 107 p. KELSALL, J.P. .1966. Additional bird observations at Bathurst Inlet, N.W.T. Can. Field-Nat. 80(3) : 178-179. KELSALL, J.P. 1967. Review of "A continent in danger" by Vincent Serventy. Can. Field-Nat. 81(4) : 294-295. FLOCK, D.R. , FULLER,. W., KELSALL, J.P. , SCOTTER, G. and WISHART, W. 1967. Resource administration and development in the Northwest Territories (A brief of the Alberta Chapter, Canadian Society of Wildlife and Fishery Biologists to the Advisory Commission on Development of Government iv the Northwest Territories) . C.S.W.F.B. Occasional Papers 2:' 6-11. KELSALL, J.P. 1968.-Hinterland Who's Who. The caribou. Queen's Printer, •"• • j Ottawa. 6 p. (published• anonymously) . "" :""""` KELSALL, J.P. 1968. The migratory 'barren-ground caribou of Canada. ____ Can. Wildl. Serv. , Monograph No. 3. The Queen's Printer, Ottawa. 340 p. CLARK, A.H. ,Kelsall J.P. and PARKER, G.R. 1968. The. land snail'- fauna, of Fundy National Park, New Brunswick. Nat. Museum Can. Bull. .223:.. 5-22. THOMAS, D.C. ,PARKER, G.R. ,KELSALL, J.P.,and'LOUGHREY, A.G. 1968. Population estimates of barren-ground caribou on the Canadian mainland from 1955 to 1967. Can. Wildl. Serv. , Progress Notes 5 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1969. Structural adaptions of moose and deer for snow. J. Mammalogy 50 (2) : 302-310. LOUGHREY,_ A.G. and KELSALL, J.P. 1969. The ecology and population- " dynamics of the barren-ground caribou in Canada. Ecology of the sub Arctic regions. Proc. of the Helsinki Symposium (UNESCO) : 275-280. • KELSALL, J.P. 1970. Review of "Reindeer ecology and management in Sweden" • • by Folke Skuncke. Arctic 23(1) : 67. • • -** Won The Wildlife Society award for best publication on terrestial wildlife in 1968. • 3. KELSALL, J.P. 1970. Interaction between barren-ground caribou and musk- rats. Can. J. Zool. 48(3) : 605. • KELSALL, J.P. 1970. Migration of the barren-ground caribou. Natural History, Aug. - Sept. : 98-106. • KELSALL, J.P. 1970. Chemical elements in waterfowl flight feathers. Can. Wildl. Serv. , Progress Notes No. 17. 11 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1970. Comparative analysis of feather parts from wild mallards. Can. Wildl. Serv. , Progress Notes No. 18. 6 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1970. Some breeding records for birds on the central Coppermine River, N.W.T. Can. Field-Nat. 84(3) : 306-307. KELSALL, J.P. 1970. Observations of birds and mammals at Bluenose Lake, N.W.T. Arctic 23(3) : 190-196. KELSALL, J.P. 1971. Die Wanderungen der Barren-Ground Karibus. • Das Tier, Nr. 4, April. pp. 4-9 and 55. KELSALL, J.P. 1971. A range extension for the bushy-tailed wood rat in Alberta. Can. Field-Nat. 85(4) : 326. KELSALL, J.P. 1971. Hinterland Who's Who. Woodchuck. Can. Midi. Serv. , LAND Pub. No. QS-9083-000-EE-A-1. 6 p. KELSALL; J.P. and TELFER, E..S.- -. 1971. Studies of the physical adaption of big game for snow. Proc. Snow and Ice in Relation to Wildlife and Recreation Symposium, Iowa State U. 134-146. KELSALL,-J.P-. and PRESCOTT, W. 1971. Moose and deer behaviour in snow in Fundy National Park, New Brunswick, Can. Wildl. Serv. , Rept: Series No. 15. 27 p. KELSALLI; J.P. , HAWLEY, V.D. and THOMAS, D.C. 1971. Distribution and • abundance of muskoxen north of Great Bear Lake. Arctic 24(3) : 157- - 161. KELSALL, J.P. 1972. The northern limits of moose in western Canada. J. Mammalogy 53(1) : 129-138. KELSALL, J.P. and CALAPRICE, J. 1972. Chemical content of waterfowl • plumage and population diagnosis. J. Wildl. Manage. 36(4) : 1088-1097. KELSALL, J.P. , KUYT, E. and ZOLTAI, S.C. 1972. Ecology of the Fort Reliance-Artillery Lake area. Can. Wildl. Serv. 99 p. 47 maps. KELSALL, .J.P. 1974. Snow goose primaries as indicators of age---and sex. Can. J. Zool. 52 (6) : 791-794. KELSALL, J.P. and TELFER, E.S. 1974. Biogeography of moose with part- icular reference to western North America. Naturaliste Can. 101: 117-130. 4. PANNEKOEK, W.J., KELSALL, J.P. and BURTON, R. 1974. Methods of analyz- ing feathers for elemental content. Environment Canada, Fisheries and Marine Serv. , Tech. Rept. No. 498. 16 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1975. Warble fly distribution among some Canadian caribou. Proc. 1st. Int. Reindeer/Caribou Symposium. Biol. Papers U. of • Alaska, Special Rept. No. 1: 509-517. -KELSALL, J.P. and BURTON, R. 1975. Experimental use of a helium atmos- phere in X-ray spectroscopy. Can. Wildl. Serv. , Progress Notes No. 49. 4 p. KELSALL, J.P. and BURTON, R. 1975. Some aspects of variability in the examination of biological materials by X-ray spectroscopy. Can. • Wildl. Serv. , Progress Notes No. 50. 5 p. • KELSALL, J.P. and BURTON, R. 1975. Abstract of Proposed I.B.P. area .at Caribou Point, Mackenzie District, Northwest Territories, Canada. (41 pp.) . In IBP ecological sites in subarctic Canada. D.K.B. Beckel (ed.) . U. of Lethbridge Production Services, Lethbridge. pp. 62-63. KELSALL, J.P. , BURTON, R. , and PANNEKOEK, W.J. 1975. Chemical variabil- - ity in plumage of wild lesser snow geese. Can. J. Zool. 53(9) : 1369-1375. KELSALL, J.P. , KUYT , E. and ZOLTAI, S.C. 1975. Abstract of Proposed _-_I.B.P. area at Fort Reliance-Artillery Lake, Northwest Territories, - Canada. (32 pp.) . In IBP ecological sites in subarctic Canada. D.K.B. Heckel (ed.) . U. of Lethbridge Production Services, Leth- bridge. pp. 16-17. KELSALL, J.P., MULLIGAN, T. and LAPI, L. 1975. Chemical examination of feathers by an electron beam. Can. Wildl. Serv. , Progress Notes No. 55. 3 p. KELSALL,J.P. , PANNEKOEK, W.J. and BURTON, R. 1975. Variability in the chemical content of waterfowl plumage. Can. J. Zool. 53(10) : 1379-1386. KELSALL, J.P., SHACKLETTE, H.T. and STEERE, W.C. 1975. Abstract of • Proposed I.B.P. area at Port Raduim, Northwest Territories, Canada. (15.pp.) . In IBP ecological sites in subarctic Canada. D.K.B. ' • Beckel (ed.) . U. of Lethbridge Production Services, Lethbridge. = pp. 112-113.. KELSALL, J.P. and BURTON, R. 1976. Variability in the chemical contamin- ' ation effects of gunshot. J. Radioanal. Chem. 31: 451-459.. KELSALL, J.P. and PANNEKOEK,- W.J. 1976. The mineral profile of plumage in captive lesser snow geese. Can. J. Zool. 54(2) : 301 - 305. , '; 5. • KELSALL, J.P. 1977. Review of "The biogeochemistry of blue, snow and Ross' geese". by Harold C. Hanson and Robert L. Jones. J. Wildl. Manage. . 41 (4) : 807-809. KELSALL, J.P. and BURTON, R. 1977. Identification of origins of lesser snow geese by X-ray spectrometry. Can. J. Zool. 55(4) : 718-732. KELSALL, J.P. , TELFER, E.S. and WRIGHT, T.D. 1977. The effects of fire on the ecology of the boreal forest, with particular reference to the Canadian north:. a review and selected bibliography. Can. Wildl. Serv. , Occasional Papers No. 32. 58 p. NOLAN, J.W. and KELSALL, J.P. 1977. Dall sheep and their habitat in relation to pipeline proposals in northwestern Canada. Can. Wildl. Serv. , Mackenzie - Valley Pipeline Investigations, Ottawa. 64 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1978. Use of chemical analyses to diagnose waterfowl populations. Forensic Science: Symposium Proceedings, April 13, 14, 15, 1977. Alberta Fish and Wildlife Service, Edmonton. pp. 131-166. KELSALL, J.P. , TELFER, E.S. and KINGSLEY, M. 1978. Relationship of bison wieght to chest girth. J. Wildl. Manage. 42(3) : 659-661. SIMPSON, K. and KELSALL, J.P. 1978. Capture and banding of adult great blue herons at Pender Harbour, British Columbia. Proc. 1978 Conf. of the Colonial Waterbird Group, New York. pp.. 71-78. KESLALL, J.P. and BURTON, R. 1979. Some problems in identification of origins_ of waterfowl by chemical profiles. Can. J. Zool. 57(12) : 2292-2302. KELSALL, J.P. and KLEIN, D. 1979. The state of knowledge of the Procupine caribou herb._ .Trans. 44th. N. Am. Wildl. and Natur. Resources Conf. ; • 508-521. . KELSALL, J.P. and SIMPSON, K. 1979. A three year study of the great blue heron . in south-western British Columbia. Proc. 1979 Meeting of the Colonial. Waterbird Group, Lafayette, LA. pp. 69-74. TELFER, E.S. and KELSALL, J.P. 1979. Studies of morphological parameters affect- ing ungulate locomotion 'in snow. Can. J. Zool. 57(11) : 2153-2159. KELSALL, J.P. , TELFER, E. and SIMPSON, K. 1980. Indirect determination of ungulate foot area. Can. J. Zool. 58(3) : 464-466. KELSALL, J.P. In press, The use -of chemical profiles from feathers to determine the origins of birds. Proc. 5th Pan African Ornithological Congress, Malawi, Aug. 23-30. 15 p. • • 6. Major Reports1 - KELSALL, J.P. 1946. A study of the Kentville Bird Sanctuary. C.W.S.C. 732. 20 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1946. A study of the waterfowl populations, waterfowl activit- ies and waterfowl environment on the marshes along and near the interpro- vincial boundary between Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. C.W.S.C. 733. 13p. HEWITT, O.H., KELSALL, J.P. and LEMIEUX, L. 1948. Annotated list of birds observed in the James ,Bay Region in the autumn of 1947. C.W.S.C. 411. 7 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1948. Mammal and bird survey New Brunswick National Park June 4- July 4,1948. C.W.S.C. 34. 34 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1948. Wildlife and geological observations from Task Force 80. C.W.S.C. 401. 38 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1949. Baffin Island caribou survey with population estimates and recommendations. C.W.S.C. 1. 20p. KELSALL, J.P. 1949. Beaver survey September 16-22, 1949. C.W.S.C. 113. 10 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1949. Beaver survey September 7-8, 1949. C.W.S.C. 114. 8 p. j KELSALL, J.P. 1949. Investigation of the white-tailed deer population on Beausoleil Island, Georgian Bay Islands National Park. C.W.S.C. 44. 6 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1951. Caribou winter range study 1950-51. C.W.S.C. 61. 18 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1951. Report on caribou calving studies 1951. C.W.S.C. 84. 24 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1951. Thelon Game Sanctuary. C.W.S.C. 198. 20 p. ' . KELSALL, J.P. 1954. Expedition of the Vermont Animal Foundation to the Thelon Game Sanctuary. C.W.S.C. 197. 15 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1955. Barren-ground caribou resurvey 1955. C.W.S.C. 84. 6 p. 1 Excluding numerous minor reports and reports subsequently published - the Canadian Wildlife Service report library contains over 30 additional documents authored by Kelsall since 1946. C.W.S.C. numbers are those assigned by the CWS central library but not all such numbers are known to the author. 7. 1 KELSALL, J.P. and LOUGHREY, A.G. 1955. Barren-ground caribou resurvey. - - C.W.S.C. 277. 21 p. LSALL, J.P. and BANFIELD, A.W.F. 1956. Barren-ground caribou populations and utilization winter 1955-56. C.W.S.C. 278. 7 p. KELSALL'y J.P. 1957. Caribou feeding habits on forested winter ranges. C.W.S. rept. 7 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1961. Aerial survey - Camp Gagetown (N.B.) , March 20-22, 1961. C.W.S. rept. 10 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1962. Wildlife inventory for management at Camp Gagetown. C.W.S.C. 1773. 23 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1963. The moose, Alces americana americana (Clinton) , of Fundy National Park, New Brunswick. Paper presented to N.E. Wild. Conf. , Portland, Me. (himeo.) 15 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1963. Research and management requirements for big game in Fundy National Park. C.W.S.C. 977. KELSALL, J.P. 1965. Fundy National Park snow study. C.W.S.C. 1762. 31 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1965. Snow Reconnaissance of the Cape Breton Highlands. C.W.S.C. 1776. 15 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1965. Caribou introduction. Cape Breton Highlands National. Park. C.W.S.C. 1734. 35 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1966. The barren-ground caribou tagging program in the North- west Territories.- - C.W.S.C.- 1029. 10 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1966. Fundy National Park snow study. C.W.S.C. 1777.. 45 p. KELSALL, J.P. and- HAWLEY, V.D. 1967. Status of barren-ground caribou north of Great Bear Lake, 1966. C.W.S.C. 1096. 8 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1968. Pesticides and mammals in New Brunswick forests. C.W.S.C. 1192. 25 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1969. Feather chemistry and waterfowl origins. Progress Report -- No. 1. C.W.S. rept. 8 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1969. Feather chemistry and waterfowl-origins. Progress Report No. 2. C.W.S. rept. 5 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1969. Feather chemistry and waterfowl origins. Progress Report - No. 3. C.W.S. rept. - 6 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1970. Feather chemistry and waterfowl origins. Progress Report No. 4. Elemental content of primaries from captive waterfowl. C.W.S. rept. 3 p. 1Substantially revised about 1963 as C.W.S.C. 1732. A 111 a -4 • • , 8. KELSALL, J.P. 1971. Problem analysis - body chemistry and waterfowl origins. C.W.S. rept. 10 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1971. Revised project plan - body chemistry and waterfowl origins. C.W.S. rept. 10 p. KELSALL, J.P. and TELFER, E.S. 1971. Morphological parameters for mammal - locomotion in snow. Paper presented to Am. Soc. Mammalogist, Vancouver, June 20, 1971. 7 p. KELSALL, J.P., SALTER, R. , SHARPE, L. , KELLERHALS, R., and ZOLTAI, S.C. 1973. Fish and 'Oildlife inventory of Driedmeat Lake, Alberta. Alberta Dept. of Environment. 180 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1974. Arctic Islands pipeline overview studies - birds. Problem analysis and project plan. C.W.S. rept. 13 p. TELFER, E.S. and KELSALL, J.P. 1974. Sexual dimorphism in ungulate hoofs. C.W.S. rept. 3 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1975. Project plan - study of the interlake sandhill crane population, Manitoba. C.W.S. rept. 25 p.. KELSALL, J.P. 1975. Whooping crane 'project, Canadian Wildlife Service, Western Region. C.W.S. report 25 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1975. A proposed functional structure for Canadian Wildlife Service, Pacific and Yukon Region; Environment Canada. C.W.S. rept. 14 p. KELSALL, J.P. 1976. Research proposal for the development of a curriculum in renewable resources technology for the Northwest Territories. Proposal for Renewable Resources Manage. Advisory Committee, N.W.T. 9 p. KELSALL, J.P. , KELSALL, J.I. and KELLER, R.A. 1977. A curriculum in renewable resource technology for the Northwest Territories. Rept. for the Renewable Resources Manage. Advisory Committee of the N.W.T. 165 p. KELSALL, J.P. and SIMPSON, K. 1978. Project plan - ecology of great heron colonies on the lower mainland of British Columbia. C.W.S. , Delta rept. (mimeo. ) 13 p. • Note: Between April, 1971 and June, 1973, 48 radio broadcasts, mostly on - northern and Arctic conservation and historical topics, were written and read for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Most were used on both the Trans-Canada Network and Northern Service, some on overseas networks, and they are currently (1979) being rebroadcast by the Northern Service. ' • 9. • KELLER, R.A. , KELSALL, J.P. 1978. Partial list of vascular plant species of the Vaseux Lake area. C.W.S. , Delta rept. (mimeo.) 13 p. • SIMPSON, K. and KELSALL, J.P. 1978. Preliminary studies of great blue heron colonies, 1977. C.W.S., Delta rept. 20 p. SIMPSON, K. and KELSALL, J.P. 1978. The Wilmer National Wildlife Area; wild- life and habitats. C.W.S., Delta rept. (mimeo.) 39 p. KELSALL, J.P. and BISDEE, J. 1979. The Porcupine caribou herd and its range - an annotated cross-references bibliography. C.W.S. rept. (mimeo.) 219 p. 41 4110 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 510 6 7 Lynn Rainey ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS _ _ _ .. • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition • Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition , Renton Edition X X , Auburn Edition , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Pub i ; .' Not 1 c e (Notice Of Availability) R4081 ' was published on April 11, 1990 S , The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the 'sum of$ 5 9 . 85 Subscribed and sworn before me this 1 1 tr day of Apr i 1 19 9 0 Not Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington • VDN#87 Revised 4/89 ( NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY lY Notice-is given under SEPA, RCW 43.216.080 that the City of Renton has j issued a Draft E.I.S. for the First City Development Corporation's Blackriver Cor- porate Park Office Buildings and Parking_ Structure. Copies of the Draft E.I.S. are available for purchase for$8.00 per copy at the public information counter(SEPA Infor- mation Center)of the newly created Corn- I munity Development Department on the third floor of the Renton Municipal Building located-at 200 Mill--Avenue-South, Renton, Washington 98085: Reading copies are • Public Notice •available in the Renton Municipal Library at- the above address.Comments are request- , ed on the above document with the com- ment period closing on May 11, 1990. A public hearing on the document will be held May 1, 1990,at 7:30 p.m.at the City Coun- cil Chambers at above address. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: FIRST CITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OFFICE PARK ECF;SA;SM-071-88-- — - - - EDF;SA;SM-109-89 First City Development Corporation propos- Public Notice- es to construct, during 1990-1994 period, ,six office buildings and a parking,garage. The site is divided into Tract A and Tract B. TRACT A The proposed action is phased construc- tion of three office buildings totally 183,600 sq. ft. on 12.71 acres.These would range ; in height from one to four stories. The alternative to the proposed action is no development of Tract.A.__ - - I TRACT B I 11 The proposed action is phased construe- ,, —_ ___________ Public Notice- Public Notice . Public; Notice - tion of three office buildings. One building earth,water, plants and animals on site; Renton city center and east of the Munici- I would be four stories high. The second development on a previously undeveloped pality of Metropolitan Seattle's Renton building would be three stories high. The site, increases in light, glare, noise and Wastewater Treatment Facility. The site I third building,seven stories high,would be traffic. Mitigating measures include water bounded on the south by Oakesdale Ave. adjacent to a three story parking structure. quality and heron rookery protection,visual S.W.and S.W.7th Street. It is bounded on The buildings would total approximately screening, and air quality measures, the north by the P-1 pond, established by ' 286,200 sq.ft. on 15.7 acres. among other considerations. the Soil Conservation Service to store run- One alternative to the proposed action is The project, as proposed, would allow off from developing lands in the Green Riv- construction of one seven story office build- First City Development Corporation to con- er Valley.Naches Avenue lies to the east of .. ing and a four story parking structure. struct an office park project consistent with the site. A second alternative is no development the zoning on this site. Published in the Valley Daily News April on the site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 11, 1990 R4081. Impacts will include disturbances tc the The project site is located northwest of h1},9 - 1oV, --►++n »C/ 9 '°fig01r ,3�! s til e. vms"--7- 4-57.---entr.--------i;,-"0-90--evEwl- Zi vier F,4+5= o L ids'J""2e VI di w y!o'j 1059 ._.._.}+2 I S. i.+l Q irci � $ 4r 121 1 -1 ---- ; __.—.--o--vafg,ii.--N-"vr"t\.n..-AwaerQo.k..xvis;F5S-r"V 4016 • if 114"c" ,24/.41( ---4rEfOrqe."-±;"44,1-""7/s"?..-titjr/ / *vs lyAii,• LPN s elads22 °if a a a. ssQe6 ' vie, 5 0 -1--(1 NTA4 hoc. zt Q s ss WI-rat 'Vint, • 5. 021, h °VA 4a k--6P"vIdi 17 I vratt40 ARK' )43-6.-10 --enAwyrq "vierawitiit----"Iyitit---fratuiTs PT) aid .._..._ ..___ , z_� .nr ., ___so N r --r .- ----.--..-----.----------sso-g6----o-aAwtr-Vn'rrntiqwV'nbr-PuVrlr Ws? 43 S o4b vri Nioriat s ri + �} 1 L1 ZS COS h1 zio2 -NA044,A- .. tro•as_._Igo/ 7 a/ 237,_._.._.._...KW* / $ __ 1 OCZ3 4rA cra'7'd CCSS-1 k'J' On __ _.._ t m _ ; viAof 1- r 0)1- airy P Yrrpsi vrrcypi -o-gz Nosifyy yg (44. 00hi vidaiiilkoo64 48 az?, 9 /7= y-ra-z--as- rri---x-rw,-E-0-5. v---.140f.rtra SSOgi "-tar 711711 idTh • (111 .1. 83 18 b -.7-1.t•bs • S • 9Ati acetyl -', T•h 8l OM PH or. =_ iV sod 172"Yelk 5 rut 4011, SSTIFIN. -C111-02-.SZ- Ityr PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON APR 2 6 1990 CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED MEMORANDUM DATE: April 26, 1990 TO: Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Planner FROM: Kim Scattarella, Stormwater Engineering Specialist K SUBJECT: BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK, TRACTS A AND B DRAFT EIS REVIEW COMMENTS The review of the Draft EIS for Black River Corporate Park, Tracts A and B is complete, and the comments about it are as follows: 1. In Table 3-7, the method outlined in the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual shall be used to compute these numbers. These numbers will need to be further documented in the Drainage Report to be submitted during Plan Review. 2. A narrative downstream analysis, with map shall be submitted with a detailed analysis of the impacts of the construction for downstream. 3. Baffled Oil/water separator(s) will be placed before the stormwater enters any biofiltration swale, and after the control restrictor manhole. Baffled Oil/water separators have been shown not to be effective unless the water velocity is less than 1.5 ft./sec. Calculations to show this shall be provided for the Plan Review phase in the Drainage report. 4. The downstream release rate shall not exceed the two-year design pre-developed release rate, as calculated by the SCS or Santa Barbara Hydrograph method (per 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual). cc: Gregg Zimmerman Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency g g Y 200 West Mercer Street, Room 205 Seattle,Washington 98119-3958 Telephone: (206) 296-7330 1-800-552-3565 Facsimile: (206) 296-7431 April 24, 1990 • Ms. Mary Lynne Myer City of Renton PLANNING DIVISION Department of Community Development CITY R N1 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 APR 2 5 1990 RECEWED Dear Ms. Myer: Blackriver Corporate Park DEIS In response to your request for comments on the Blackriver Corporate Park Draft Environmental Impact Statement, we are submitting the following air quality considerations. The air quality impact analysis section of the DEIS was generally well written and documented. Unfortunately, there was an error in determining carbon monoxide concentrations downwind of the proposed parking garage. It is physically impossible for natural process to produce ambient concentrations that would exceed the highest concentration occurring within the garage. Therefore, this analysis must be disregarded. In any respect, based upon the concentrations predicted within the garage, it is unlikely that the parking garage traffic will cause violations pf any ambient air quality standards. This will, of course not be true for traffic on adjacent roadways. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Sincerely, Anita J. Frankel Air Pollution Control Officer GSP:vjd Serving: King County Kitsap County Fierce County, Snohomish County Anita J.Frankel,Air Pollution Control Officer BOARD OF DIRECTORS Win Granlund,Commissioner Kitsap County Pete Kinch,Mayor Everett Norm Rice,Mayor Seattle Tim Hill,King County Executive Dadene Madenwald,Member at Large Joe Stortini,Fierce County Executive Peter Hudey,Councilman Snohomish County Louis Mentor,Mayor Bremerton Karen Valle,Mayor Tacoma PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON APR 2 5 1990 RECEWED Washington State Senate Olympia Office: Home Address: 109 B Institutions Building Senator'Michael E. Patrick 18809 134th Avenue SE Olympia,Washington 98504 Renton,Washington 98058 (206) 786-7692 47th Legislative District (206) 631-6036 SCAN: 298-7692 SCAN: 277-7235 April 24, 1990 Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development 200 Mill Ave South Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Blackriver Corporate Park Environmental Impact Statement Dear Ms. Myer: • I would like the heron rookery in the Blackriver Riparian Forest to be preserved, and recommend that the City of Renton critically review the Blackriver Corporate Park EIS, dated April 1990, considering carefully the comments from the Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation and Seattle Audubon Society. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Michael E. Patrick State Senator 47th Legislative District MEP/eb cc: Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation Seattle Audubon Society Committees: Energy and Utilities • Governmental Operations • Law and Justice • Transportation • Subcommittee on Corrections PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON APR 2 7 1990 To: Don Erickson �����® cc: Mary Lynn Myer ��E, From: Susan Krom Date: April 26, 1990 Subject: Blackriver Corporate Park EIS extension request Due to the complexity of the subject EIS, limited resources , previous commitments of our experts , and delays in locating pertinent files in the City offices (files were archived by the City of Renton) , we respectfully request a 15-day extension, making the deadline for comments Saturday, May 26 . If accepted, please let us know if the date will be changed to a workday. Thank you. Sincerely, Susan Krom 393-2411 cc: Seattle Audubon Society c: r'0 CITY OF RENTON may. Community Development Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director April 11, 1990 TO: Recipients of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement P P for the Blackriver Corporate Park Office Buildings ECF;SA;SM-071-88 and ECF;SA;SM-109-89 The accompanying Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) identifies the environmental consequences associated with construction and occupancy of six office buildings and a parking structure proposed in the Blackriver Corporate Park, located on Oakesdale Avenue in Renton. The site is currently zoned Office Park and is divided into two tracts: Tract A and B. TRACT A The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from one to four stories. These buildings would provide 183 , 600 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 800 autos. The document also analyzes a no action alternative for Tract A. TRACT B The proposal includes phased construction of three office buildings ranging in height from three to seven stories. These buildings would provide 286,200 square feet of space. Surface parking would accommodate approximately 500 autos and another 800 stalls would be provided in a three story parking structure. The document also analyzes two additional alternatives for tract B: a single seven story building and no action. IMPACTS The following impacts are addressed in the DEIS: earth, air quality, surface water and water quality, vegetation, wildlife resources, unique terrestrial resources (great blue heron) , noise, land and shoreline use, light and glare, and parks and recreation. The DEIS identifies a variety of mitigation measures. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Information in the document will be used by the City of Renton to make informed decisions regarding this proposal consistent with the intent of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) . Written public comment on the DEIS is encouraged and will be accepted for 30 days from this date. Following the 30 day review period, responses to comments will be prepared and incorporated in a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) . Written comments on the DEIS will be accepted through May 11, 1990 and should be addressed to: Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner Department of Community Development 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 A public hearing to accept written and oral comments on the DEIS will be held in the Renton City Council Chambers on Tuesday, May 1, 1990, at 7: 30 P.M. , 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA. Please call Mary Lynne Myer at 235-2550, for additional information. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning PLANNING DIS CITY OF,q�j j/ iv mx THE SCHUMAN COMPANY Ae C The Columbia Center, Suite 4640 wisp 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, WA. 98104 (206 ) 386-5588 FAX: (206) 386-7241 Date : March 6 , 1990 To : Ms. Janet Samek-McKague City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Attn: RE: Rivertech Corporate Center We are transmitting herewith: Latest Heron Rookery Monitoring Report from IES Associates . For your approval For your review For your records Per your request For your information XX Per your instructions Remarks : There is no new activity in rookery; Sincerely, By: it IES ASSOCIATES RECEPII ET : 0 2 1990 1514 Muirhead Olympia,WA 98502 Ph:(206)943-0127 8835 SW Canyon Lane Portland,OR 97225 Ph:(503)297.6081 • February 26 , 1990 TO : Schumann Development Company 16300 Christianson Road Seattle, Washington 98118 • Attention: Kathy Eggar • SUBJECT : Heron Rookery Monitoring Report, Black River Corporate Park, Renton, Washington Dear Kathy: On February 14, 1989, the rookery was visited and monitored for 1 hour and 45 minutes. Extended monitoring was conducted because of the increased activity in the nests in the area and in the rookery trees surrounding the nests. There were a total of 21 birds in the rookery with 8 nests having 2 birds and 5 nests having a single bird occupying or working (on) the nests. An additional 6 birds were located in the pond or in the trees next to the pond. The areas north and east of the rookery along the slope of the bluff and the railroad tracks were examined to determine if the birds were using these areas. During the monitoring period (i.e. , 1 hour, 45 minutes) no birds entered or left the rookery. The monitoring was conducted from 2 :00 p.m. to 3 :45 p.m. under overcast skies with good visibility. 4 February 21, 1990 the site was visited by Rex Van Wormer and Reid Storre at 4 :00 p.m. and was monitored until 5 :15 p.m. i � There are 31 herons in the rookery, with 18 of the 24 nests on the,:s:site being utilized. Of the nests, 12 have 2 birds, on or •'"_,P work`-' ng the-nests. The majority of the nest repair was ' comp.leted''with little or no continuation of the display activity that,, was present on February 14, 1990. A single bird at the ou.ter:',;edge d'f the ,trees slid not appear to interacting with any fzthe':. remaining bards. There was only�.l—bird in the pond and f 6 • Renton Heron Rookery February 26, 1990 no birds on any of the typical offsite roosting areas where birds were observed earlier in the year. The birds appeared to be starting full nesting activity. During both of the February monitoring periods) two people were used in an effort to evaluate the effects of activities (either at the developed portions of the area, traffic, or the existing construction) on birds doing pre-nesting activity. Within the limitations of our survey (i.e. , 3 hours over a two-day period) , we were unable to see any affects of noises in any of these areas on the behavior of the activity of the birds. Regardless of the noise , truck passage, or other activities taking place surrounding them including traffic on the railroad on February 14, 1900, the birds did not appear to be affected. There was no evidence of unusual movement (explosive flights from the rookery or other visible activities) that would indicate an effect. Because of the distance, the timing, and the manner of our observations, we could not state unequivocally that some minor effects were not occurring . However, the responses and the activities on the nests are consistent of the activities observed over the past 2 years during construction of Oaksdale Road, logging activity, and the building construction. In both of these years , the birds continued to have successful nesting seasons , with a higher nest survival rate than is recorded as typical in great blue heron rookeries throughout the United States. Our conclusion is based on the assumptions that if the activities taking prlace were having a significant negative impact on the rookery, the colony would not have expanded from 8 to 24 nests over a 3-year period. The nest utilization is 95 - 100 percent with an average brood size greater than 3 .2 young per nest. Our conclusion regarding the effects of disturbance on this rookery is based on our surveys of this rookery, of the Auburn rookery, and of the Smith-Bybee Lake rookery in Portland, 2 Renton Heron Rookery February 26 , 1990 Oregon over the past 3 years. This conclusion is supported by unpublished annual reports of the Oregon Department of Fish and it Wildlife and the Smith-Bybee Lake rookery. Our conclusion is: Urban rookeries and urban-raised birds react differently and do not appear to be as subject to human disturbance as reports of rural undisturbed rookeries were reported in the literature in the 1970 ' s. Monitoring will be continued through the April 1, 1990. At this time, the formal monitoring for Schumann Development will be discontinued. Monitoring of the rookery will be continued by IES Associates as an independent study. This concludes the February report of heron rookery activity, Black River Corporate Park, Renton, Washington. Sincerely, K- 1°Z P.L. Van Wormer Senior Biologist IES Associates 3 King County Natural Resources and Parks Division Parks,Planning and Resources Department PLANNING DIVISION 707 Smith lbwer Building cir'OF RENTO J 506 Second Avenue Seattle,Washington 98104 FEB 91990 REC VEIl February 7, 1990 Ben Cleveland Washington Department of Natural Resources P. O.'- Box 68 Enumclaw, WA. 98122 RE: FPS-09-13875- First City Dear Ben; We have previoulsy provided you with the requested heron and raptor appraisal study furnished by the applicant to complete the existing SEPA checklist information. This report satisfies our request made on December 22 , 1989. Agencies and affected/interested parties have received copies and their opinions have been solicited. Steve Penland stated that the Department of Wildlife has no comment. Even though other reviewers have disagreed with the report's conclusion regarding heron, hawk and owl utilization of the site, it is our recommendation that this FPA be approved for phase or 8 acres (see attached FPA application submitted by the applicant) subject to the two conditions stated below. It is our intention to seek resolution of these wildlife issues at the next stage of development when a new SEPA checklist will be triggered by the next Class IV conversion application. Some form of habitat mitigation may be determined to be appropriate at that stage. During the review of this project, the Muckleshoot Tribe commented on the possibility(letter dated November 2 , 1989) that cultural resources could be uncovered during site preparation and that steps be taken to mitigate that situation. We believe that this is a legitimate concern that should be reflected in a permit condition. We recommend that a qualified archaeologist be retained to observe all stages of grading and excavation. Should any cultural resources be identified, work should be suspended in the area to allow time for a survey. The Muckleshoot Tribe should be given the opportunity to approve of the choice of archaeologist and all of these expenses should be borne by the applicant. In regards to vegetation removal, King County recommends that approximately 1/4 to 1/3 of an acre of trees in the extreme SE corner of the site be preserved and made into a native growth protection easement. This area, defined as the land at and below the 270 contour interval, is not within the construction limits of the approved structures. It also is the most attractive for bird utilization as it provides an outer peripheral tree line as described in Conclusion #7, page 10 of the consultant report. These trees also abut remaining trees on the adjacent developed property to the east. To enhance this habitat area we also recommend that the applicant plant three foot high Douglas fir seedlings in the extreme SE corner to fill an empty space and provide 10 by 10 spacing of trees. I have attempted to contact the owner's representative to discuss the basis of these recommendations but have been unsuccessful this week. For more information please contact _ me Tuesday or Wednesday at 296-0161. Sincerely, 271,e2/:62'esZo/v Michael H. Bonoff p Encl: FPA for 8 acres of clearing •1 IES ASSOCIATES 1514 Muirhead Olympia, WA 98502 Ph:(206)943-0127 8835 SW Canyon Lane Portland, OR 97225 Ph:(503)297-6081 PLAIVRIPN Prl January 31, 1990 .�, '�0FRE�?fa`� 64 TO : City of Renton 9 i590 Planning Department Y� Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 Attention: Janet Williams SUBJECT : Heron Rookery Monitoring. Dear Janet: On February 2, 1990, the heron rookery at the Black River Corporate Park, located on the P-1 Canal , was monitored for the fifth time since January 15 , 1990 . The monitoring datum is as follows: January 15 , 1990. Time: 3 :35 pm. High clouds, no rain, visibility good. There were 5 adult birds in the rookery tree and 14 birds along the pond. None of the birds are paired. There is no apparent nest construction activity. When flushed by a helicopter, the birds flew northeast to the alder trees along the north side of the railroad track. After 30 minutes, no birds had returned. Monitoring was discontinued. Observers: Rex Van Wormer and Diane Robbins. January 18 , 1990 . Time : 9 : 45 am. Visibility good. Rookery tree photographed. There were 3 adult birds in the rookery tree and 9 on the ground along the north side of the pond . There was no indication of nest construction or pre- , -breeding displays . After 15 minutes , one bird left the roolcery. Over the next 15 minutes , the two remaining birds 'moved in and,.. out of nest number 3 in the northern most tree and -nest,,number 14 in the southern most tree. Monitoring terminated ,a\f:tec =..45•'.;minutes. Observer: Reid Storre. '- \\ • ' „`" � fi' f p. <z;a. Heron Rookery January 31, 1990 January 23, 1990. Time: 4:15 pm. Visibility fair. There were 15 birds on the site. During a 45 minute period, 5 birds remained in the rookery tree. Four of the remaining 10 birds flew in and out of the tree. None of the birds appeared to be tending nests . For the first time , there were two birds together. One bird remained on nest number 14 , while a second moved around the perimeter of the nest. On this day, we also monitored the Auburn rookery. There were 3 birds in that rookery;. Observers: Rex Van Wormer and Diane Robbins. January 29, 1990. Time: 1:35 pm. Visibility good. There were 17 birds on the site. Eight birds were either in the rookery tree for the full duration of the site visit or moved in and out of the. tree. This was the first time we have observed nest mending activities . There were 2 birds on two nests, however, neither was nest number 14. Six of the remaining birds remained perched in the lower limbs of the large cottonwood trees at the northwestern end of the pond. The remaining 3 remained motionless along the waters edge. The general area was examined for other adult herons . There were 3 birds in the alders north of the railroad track approximately 900 feet east of the Black River site. Observer: Rex Van Wormer. February 2 , 1990. Time: 11:08 am. High clouds, light rain. There were 16 birds in the rookery. The birds were concentrated in the southern most tree with at least 3 nests having 2 birds on the nest. The remainder of the birds are setting out on the outer branches away from the nests. No other adult birds were seen in the vicinity. The birds were observed for approximately 50 minutes form the barricade west of the rookery. The birds on the nests were not actively mending the nests nor displaying to each other. Two birds flew out and then back into the rookery, but did not enter a nest. Observers : Rex Van Wormer and Diane Robbins. The Auburn rookery was also monitored on February 2. There were 11 birds in the rookery, but none were paired, actively mending nests , or displaying . A call was made to Oregon 2 Heron Rookery January 31, 1990 Department of Wildlife regarding the, Smith-Bybee Lake area rookery. On January 31, 1990 , they monitored that rookery. There were 4 birds in the rookery, however, none were paired or using the nests. Based on the monitoring results of the Black River rookery and the Auburn rookery, it appears that the birds are from two to three weeks from starting any serious nesting or pre-nesting breeding activities. The activity on February 2nd, is typical of the type of activity that occurred in the first and second weeks of February 1989. Serious nesting and pre-nesting display activities started in mid to late February last year with the initiation of nast bonding• after the leaves started to grow around March 1 , 1989. This timing also corresponds . to 1988 , when all of the nests in the rookery were not full until the second week of March. On January 28, 1990 and Feb 2, 1990 , additional time was spent between the ongoing construction site and the rookery. We were unable to notice any change in bird stances or activities during construction when trucks or cars entered or left the existing development, when an airplane flew over within 100 feet of the top of the tree, when a train was connecting cars, or when blasting occurred in the rookery to the northwest. Earlier in the year, a helicopter flying close to the rookery did flush the birds from the area. They flew northeast to an area within 300 feet of the ongoing construction and in view of the new building . The birds remained in this area, apparently undisturbed by the activity surrounding the building, since they were still in this area when monitoring was discontinued. Conclusions: Nesting appears to be progressing on the same time table as in years 1988 and 1989 . In both of these years nesting did not start until early March. 3 • Heron Rookery January 31, 1990 As of February 2 , 1990 , there were only three of 25 nests being visited by more than one bird at a time. There was only limited nest mending and no display activity between January 15 and Feb. 2. Concentrated pre-nesting bonding or nesting appears to be two to three weeks away. Sincerely, /7 � iatexd4&/(--- t L R.L. Van Wormer Senior Biologist IES Associates 4 07.1 -61 800e t 70 800 Fifth Avenue , Seattle,Washington 98104 (206)624-9223 Facsimile(206)fitistaly WASHINGTON, INC. December 29 , 1989 plp,NNINGpIVBSB®N CBTY OF RFNTON 2 Mr. Donald Erickson JAN 1989 Zoning Administrator RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK PHASE VII EIS , . Dear Don: Today I received a copy of the letter dated December 26 , 1989 from Jonathon Ives to yourself amending the contract services to the above referenced EIS. Included in that letter is a revised proposed schedule for the Blackriver Corporate Park Phase VII EIS. In a nut shell, I find this schedule to be unacceptable. Your consultants are now proposing a final EIS issuance around June 25, 1990, which is a full seven ( 7) months beyond the original targeted date. I request a meeting be set up immediately between yourself, Jones & Stokes, and First City to discuss why the latest proposal is for such an additional length of time. When we met in October, 1989 and agreed to hold our Phase VIII application and to include a broader scope on the Phase VII EIS, it was basically with the understanding that we would be extending the process approximately sixty days. I can see no reason this process should now take as long as indicated in this current schedule. I again, request a meeting immediately with all parties concerned to see what can be done to shorten the time frame. I await your reply. Very truly yours, FIRST CITY ASHIN N, INC. —721,-4e* Mark Miller Vice President Development MM:sp cc: Jonathon Ives Royce Berg r' / A Irw 1„ Suite 4170 800 Fifth Avenue r7 I' '1 Seattle,Washington 98104 (206)624-9223 .. Facsimile(206)382-9752 5A-011 -I% fRStCriy WASHINGTON, INC. Pi ,*,NNING DIVISION CITY®E RENTON JAN 21989 ECE VED December 21, 1989 Mr. Donald Erickson Zoning Administrator CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South / Renton, Washington 98055 RE: BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK PHASE VII EIS Dear Don: I am writing to express my concern about the continued delay in issuance of the draft E.I.S. for the above referenced project. Even though we agreed the first of October to encompass a larger scope of work by including your Phase VIII application as part of this E.I .S. , it was with the understanding that the draft E.I .S. would be published before the end of 1989. It is apparent that that date will not be achieved. Now, very recently, I have been made aware of the fact that you have requested additional information in the E.I .S. relative to the seismic and geology issues related to the Blackriver site. As I expressed to you on the phone, I have no trouble with you requesting this information, but I feel that it is inappropriate to do that in an E.I.S. , but rather it should be done during the building permit process. Don, the point is that it is time to get on with the publishing of this document. I would like your department to give me the anticipated date that we can expect the draft E.I .S. to be published, followed by the commitment and effort on everyone' s part to meet that date. I await your reply. Very truly yours, FIRST CITY HINGTON, INC. Mark Miller Vice President Development MM:sp RICHA I" ARAMBURU ATTORNEY AT LAW J. RICHARD ARAMBURU SUITE 209, COLLEGE CLUB BUILDING JEFFREY M. EUSTIS 505 MADISON STREET SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 (206) 625-9515 Decem ie=r�,123� CITY OFIRENT0 DEC 1 4 1989 Mr. Donald K. Erickson D Department of Community Development' VE [I) City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Black River Corporate Park Phase VII Scoping Comments Dear Mr. Erickson: This office represents the Rebound Program of the Seattle Building and Construction Trades Council . Rebound is concerned about prevailing wage, job safety, and environmentally sound building practices within the boundaries of our members ' working and living environment. We have reviewed the Black River Corporate Park, Phase VII office building proposed adjacent to the P-1 Detention Pond. Building Trades believes that this large development project presents significant economic and environmental issues of concern to our members and to the community. The following impacts should be addressed in the environmental impact statement (EIS) . Wildlife The project is next to a heron rookery which is a unique and valuable natural resource . Thus the impacts to the rookery should be carefully analyzed . First, an extensive inventory should be conducted. The City should determine its use by herons and its regional importance. Then impacts can be predicted. The city should concentrate on a variety of mitigation measures to protect the rookery. Most important, a large buffer should be required . Resource agencies have previously recommended a buffer ranging from 600 to 1000 feet around the rookery, as well as 200 feet around all other wetlands. Vegetation should be left in the buffer, and no filling should be proposed within it . The buffer should be fenced . In addition, the proposed building should be shaped and sited to act as a buffer itself, with a design to eliminate noise and glare . Finally, the City should ensure that construction would not occur during the nesting season. Fish " Fishery resources of Springbook Creek and other water bodies should be investigated and documented. The salmon runs in the Green River tributary system are already critically and severely depressed. The City should evaluate the impacts to these salmon runs and spawning habitat. Water Quality Runoff from the project should be quantified. The city next should determine its pollutant load, and predict the impacts to the receiving water. Surface water controls should be proposed as mitigation. The city should also investigate the groundwater hydrology and any connection to the wetlands. Wetlands The City should conduct a thorough inventory of any wetlands on the site, including areas of the property proposed for parking. If any wetlands are found on the site, impacts should be addressed. The City should evaluate alternative designs and sites that would avoid any filling of the wetlands. Archaeology The proposed site could contain historical and cultural resources of importance to the Muckleshoot Tribe. The EIS should discuss these. Consultation with the Tribe is recommended . Traffic The city should analyze traffic impacts at nearby roads and intersections . Any decrease in level of service should be determined, as should any increase in delay times at intersections . Cumulative Impacts The proposed office building is part of a larger corporate park yet to be completed. The city should determine the cumulative impacts from all projects proposed in the vicinity. This is particularly important for the heron rookery, which could be encircled by office buildings. Economics The construction of a large project does affect the local economy. Such effects are determined by who is hired and how much they are paid. The City should identify whether workers would come from the local community, and if they would be paid prevailing wages. The analysis should include both construction workers and permanent employees . The City of Renton next should examine whether the local community would receive the economic benefits . That is, determine the likelihood of the wages returning to the area through retail purchases, housing, and taxes . ,, . .. 110 1111, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the scope of the project. We look forward to reviewing the draft EIS. Si c re your , \:C J. Richard Aramburu JRA/km ) • King County Natural Resources and Parks Division Parks,Planning and PUNNING DIVISION Resources Department 707 Smith-lower Building CITY OF RENTON 506 Second Avenue Seattle,Washington 98104 91989 NOVa 4! RECEIVED November 22 , 1989 J. Steve Summersett Summersett E and L 13447' NE 132nd Street Kirkland, WA. 98034 • - Re: FP-09-13875 Dear Steve, According to the understanding we reached over the phone on November 1, King County will process your Class IV General Conversion permit using the existing checklist to satisfy our. SEPA requirements provided that (1) you reduce the scope of your' clearing to Phase I or 8 acres (you have yet to revise your FPA application to reflect the smaller acreage) and (2) you respond to our request for a raptor and heron appraisal outlined below. SCOPE OF RAPTOR AND HERON APPRAISAL I. The effects of tree removal will be discussed in relation to: 1. Primary and secondary cavity nesting bird habitat on site or near the site on the adjacent hillside. 2 . Raptor habitat (specifically Red tailed hawk and Great Horned Owl consisting of nesting, resting and foraging activities on site - or near the site on the adjacent hillside. 3 . Heron habitat consisting of nesting, resting, foraging, breeding activities on site or near the site including the hillside and existing rookery. 4 . Wind currents and how alterations would effect raptor and heron flight patterns . I - 1 This request is based on new information which has been provided by permit reviewers and which was not provided originally in part 5a. of the SEPA checklist. We recommend that you retain a qualified wildlife consultant to perform this work. Recent birds sightings will be forwarded separately to you for your information. We are already in receipt of your study from Rex Van Wormer of IES Associates dated August 2 , 1988 In order to provide a complete picture of your proposal, I request that you estimate the volume of trees, species and age classes to be removed. This information did not appear in your SEPA checklist or on your Forest Practices Application. The immediate area in which your proposal is located has a high density of known archaeological sites which were occupied by Muckleshoot Tribal ancestors. Therefore King County will recommend special measures to protect these resources. After we review this information we will determine what conditions, if any, to recommend to the Department of Natural Resources. There have been several agencies, groups and individuals that have expressed concern over clearing on this property. Interested people will be given the opportunity to make timely comments on the appraisal. We are aware of the significant investment in time First City has made to obtain related King County permits and that your are anxious to begin site work. We are making a good faith effort to facilitate the processing and evaluation of this permit as soon as possible. Since rely, y, Z57-24/ II Michael Bonoff Resource Planner cc: King County Building land Land Division Open Space Program Muckleshoot Indian Tribe City of Renton Audubon Society Washington Department of Ecology " Wildlife " " " Natural Resources s - o-� � � 1 q .Eji Z 9Z 1869 tl0 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000 November 3, 1989 ,. Ms. Jeannette Samek-McKague City of Renton NOV 7 1989 6-1 Community Development Department ff.. � ;1 200 Mill Avenue South I I'•.' �� �, � `I Renton, WA 98055 t ' RE: Draft Black River EIS - Phase VII Dear Jeannette: Thank you for sending us the above referenced DEIS to review. There was some initial confusion here, at first we thought the preliminary DEIS referred to the entire Black River site, including the area north of the Forebay pond. We assume that this document is only referring to Parcel A and B south of the pond and our comments are restricted only to these parcels. However, we would like to note, as we have stated before, that the prior 1981 DEIS/EIS done on the north part of the site would need updating before development can be considered for the northern portion of the site. From field visits and discussions with Jones and Stokes, consultants, it appears that the wetland that is being referred to ("1.1 acre" , etc. p. 3-14) is probably accurately defined and delineated. However: 1. There is no map showing the delineated wetland or wetland delineation forms; 2. There is no discussion of the wetland delineation methodology used. These two items need to be included in the document before it is released, as other agencies and groups will be interested. We would recommend that the wetland be shown on each of the maps of the alternatives (Figures 2-6,2-7) . Presumably Tract A (Figure 2-2) has no wetlands on site. Do Figures 2-3,2-4, and 2-5 refer to alternative B-1? This is not clear. We also had the following recommendations: 1. We would not favor any of the alternatives that would require filling of the wetland. Therefore, we would not favor alternative B1. 2. We recommend a minimum buffer of 50' around the wetlands. -day-3 A a Ms. Samek-McKague November 3, 1989 Page 2 3. We recommend that biofiltration swales be used before discharge of any stormwater to the wetland, and preferably discharge to the existing swale that forms the northern border to parcel B. 4. The wetland could possibly be enhanced as a mitigative measure to enhance wildlife habitat. We would be happy to discuss desirable enhancement techniques and education/information display options with you. Thank you for the opportunity to comment, Jeannette. We apologize for the delay in our response. Sincerely, Sincerely, Terra Prodan Michelle Stevens Shoreline Specialist Wetlands Ecologist Shorelands and Coastal Zone Shorelands and Coastal Zone Management Program Management Program TP:MS:so C• apy . . 1" JONES& STOKES ASSOCIATES, INC. / 1808- 136TH PLACE, NE / BELLEVUE, WA 98005 206/641-3982 FAX 206/641-3147 November 29, 1989 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Mr. Mark Miller First City Developments Corp. DEC 41989 Suite 4170 800 Fifth AvenueRECEIVED Seattle, WA 98104 SUBJECT: Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase VII New Proposed Action Dear Mark: As you know, Jones & Stokes Associates is preparing a revised Preliminary EIS to reflect the change in Proposed.Action for Tracts A and B of the Blackriver Corporate Park. To assist us in this effort, we are in need of the following additional information regarding the new Proposed Action: Tract A Number of parking stalls proposed; - Landscape plans; • Number of people accommodated in each phase; - Alternative site plan for Tract A with parking structure; - Split of number of parking between surface vs. parking structure for the parking structure alternative; - Amount of fill (if any) needed for Tract A; and • Drainage and grading plans including limits of construction and estimates of stormwater runoff volumes. 1 _ . 411 Mr. Mark Miller November 29, 1989 Page - 2 - Tract B • Camera ready quality (for printing of EIS) 11"x 17" site plan of Tract B Proposed Action and Alternatives; • Landscape plan; • Will 55,000 cy (cubic yards) of fill still be needed for Tract B to raise base grade above the floodplain elevation of 15 feet; if not, what is quantity of fill needed; • Number of people accommodated in each phase; • Amount of surface parking per phase for Proposed Action in Tract B; and • Drainage and grading plans including limits of construction and estimates of stormwater runoff volumes. We would appreciate receiving any additional drawings(e.g.,conceptual drawings, elevations) to be developed by 1pn for the project. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jonathan H. Ives Project Manager JHI/bdg cc: J. Samek-McKague, City of Renton R. Berg, 1pn 6 m ArahiteEture and Planninm • f•, Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 October 13, 1989 • OCT Z j 7 1989 Mr. Don Erickson [� (1J `J i LJ City of Renton Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: First City Development Corp. Blackriver Corporate Park Phase VIII NW 89017 File SA-109-89 Dear Don: Per your letter of 9 October 1989 to Mark Miller of First City Developments Corporation, we are dismayed with the comments and questions raised, in particular after our meeting with yourself and the City on the E. I.S. for Tract A and Phase VII. Per the list of questions in your letter: 1. This proposal is well outside any setbacks or parameters considered in Phase VII E.I.S. We are well outside those parameters and any others that might have been referenced. This is also referenced in the checklist submitted to the city. 2. The phasing sequence is noted in the checklist and on the drawings - the A Building to the west is the first phase, and there is no reference or hint of a third phase (and any future developments require submittals for action) . 3. A short plat is not concurrent with this proposal and has no effect on site plan submittal at this time. 4. Future development on the Tract A site is obvious and stated as a fact in the checklist. This requires a separate submittal and action by the city, per your comments in the letter. Please note this development is on Burlington Northern property and not Tract A and is on land filled by the City of Renton under their own actions. We see no reason why this application cannot be processed and suggest you personally review the submittal and confer with the city attorney. The submittal is not premature, has no history or overtones of environmental significance, and is being unjustly stopped by the staff of the City of Renton. I q J _1 Letter to City of Renton October 13, 1989 Page two After you have personally reviewed the submittal , I suggest we discuss this with the city attorney and First City Developments, before you stop or return the submittal . Re ctfully, / , Royc :- g . • Pre ident RAB:mp cc: Mark Miller Jeff Goltz, Lane, Powell , Moss & Miller Leason Pomeroy Northwest, Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 • tk e ' :, CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor • October 9, 1989 Mr. Mark Miller First City Developments Corporation . 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: Submittal for Blackriver Corporate Park, Phase VIII File SA-109-89 • Dear Mr. Miller: • Recently our staff reviewed the submittal for Phase VIII of the Black River Corporate Park. As you are aware, the subject property for this project is included and is currently being evaluated for the establishment of development parameters under the Blackriver Corporate Park Phase VII EIS. Many questions were raised at our meeting regarding the project including: Is this proposal in keeping with the setbacks and parameters being considered in the Phase VII • EIS?; what is the phasing sequencing being proposed and whether there is actually a third phase; whether there will be an application to short plat the property to create two lots?; and whether there are any plans for the future development of the remainder of the site? Further, future development projects for this site will require the submittal of an environmental checklist since the EIS is merely reviewing development on Tract "A" in a generic sense in order establish development parameters for future projects on this parcel. Therefore, due to the fact that the EIS is still under preparation for Phase VII and due to the fact that the proposal raises several questions with respect to the actual project and with respect to the relationship between the project and the Phase VII EIS currently being prepared, I have determined that the application is premature until after the EIS has been adopted by the City. You may pick up the application package, except for one copy for our records, at our office. A refund check will be sent to you as soon as we are able to make the appropriate arrangements with our Finance Department. Please call me if you have any questions or would like to discuss this decision at 235- 255 S. cere y, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/JSM/adk cc: Royce Berg LPN. Architects jsm:phase8 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Rdnton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Architecture and Planning Px1 npomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENT'ON HISTORICAL DESIGN NARRATIVE January 9, 1991 FEB 2 1 1991 BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK t PHASE VII TRACT B (SA;SM-071-88) NW 88041 Tract B site plan approval was originally submitted in August 1988 and was a two-winged 286,000 square foot seven-story office facility situated on the northwest corner of the property. The building was sited as a permanent buffer between the development and the heron rookery. The site plan included surface parking and filling of the old portion of the Blackriver Channel per the original Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in 1981. The original sub- mittal was declared environmentally significant because of the relation to the heron rookery (which is not on this property but to the north on property ded- icated by First City for a preserve and the P-1 detention basin) . A new EIS for the property was started. Preliminary data and comments from the city staff and the EIS consultant rec- ommended relocating the building further away from the heron rookery per the bubble diagrams provided by the city. The building was relocated to the south, with a parking structure utilized as a buffer and to accommodate the parking due to the lost land for additional buffering and habitat for the rookery. Alternate B-2 reflects this submittal in the final impact statement and as B-3 in the earlier July 1989 draft impact statement. Alternate B-1 per city recommendations, reduced the size of the building into three buildings: a seven-story, three-story and four-story with a parking structure. Alternate B-1 evolved per staff and public draft EIS comments into a seven- story building on the east side of Tract B, a four-story building to the west of the seven-story, and a three story to the west of the four-story building, with structured parking as a buffer with a blank wall facing the rookery. The setbacks from the rookery were increased from 400 feet to 600 feet, with an additional 10 foot high berm and 20 foot high evergreen trees to supplement the open habitat buffer at the edge of the new setback from the heron rookery. Per city recommendations, this evolved into the current submittal which reduced the height of the seven-story by transferring area to the four and three-story buildings, resulting in the initial 286,0000 square feet in two five-story buildings and a one four-story building with a structured parking garage. Significant impact and variations recommended by staff and EIS consultant have resulted in a concentrated, expensive development with structured parking on a small portion of the land originally zoned for office to maintain the same amount of buildable square footage. The increased rookery setbacks, addi- tional reserve and buffer areas forced development on a small , condensed por- tion of the site. The increased architectural land use restraints, increase in buffers and preserved habitats (directed by City of Renton and the EIS con- sultant) substantially buffer the development from the heron rookery. Buildings are designed with earth tone colors, hoods or overhangs on the rook- ery side above the thirty foot height level , and within 750 feet of the rook- ery. Tinted glass is utilized versus reflected glass, except at the main entry points to the building which face away from the rookery. The property for Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and S.W. 7th Street was dedicated by First City and were improved, including utilities with the majority partici- pant being First City (in order to develop these properties) . Density of development is well under the traffic proposed to be generated in the Trans- portation Studies. First City funded the study as well as the L. I.D. with the understanding that traffic and L.I.D. assessments for specific projects would be offset against these costs or to the point the assessments exceeded L. I.D. costs. Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc., Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 ERON ROOKER r.„. • . • ji ...i.s, ... . ,..... -• #11 • RIPARIEST PRESERVE liteWei, 111111111 • ic• ... . l' ;''.'.- . ---.....•-•-• 4 4149,froillOOP" 4,4. 4 II . ' •il: „'-iti, - eeoPiNcji ./ir .• *-•• . • -..- : 11 1 lb it14 01..1:.0., ‘-toilk* ,,, , •• ' . ir. 40p..4..::•). • • . ) 11144110.1.'-- s' '— . ilk \ # r_..•/- • . 'St VACANT J. • i-. ' ••`• - . -ir '•4* ..._, , • •- , .:. \ .-.. . ..... ic 1 •• • 4. 11,S- OFFICE "":•,: ‘ . • it lit...."..• .• .4 %Ir.' / .•i>. • • • . 04,1 •::::-.•••. • • ..., • „,.• /Iiilt;•tbiri,l-..4itio- • •' • • • • • • •••''•• • • al7lif 11, t .• 4 ' ,* 'AU' \\ '...4.•617L;r4 Ni;. '1".._..•••••••..Z.41.6 'Al . • • • .. . .. .6. -71-1., .. ..-C-• ..o.,••_.. ••••.- V -. • Inif"--- - •:•*.i--41.1.-- r '••0960 .--"--q w/ •••,..ikr%649 g 14r4•••••.- --4:••:- 411,- - _•.,... .;_ O. . ,...lit Itilik-IIPNY a"-..._YK46414. 32B--s-b-1 "risAidliW:4. I -6921'Nf 111%,..4scr 41110- 0.0.0-/----.....--4:1--7 ,,• 1.,, ......0.- - ... - '-- - -•.,-; -..... ,,.. ....111111111.11‘,. •,... vs ck.,..--Lw-.... . A••••• el 4,11 --• -'. .• a J ..".•'• ""•',.'t / ••••wi•akiroi it,•-7 ; rAr,i, .. . 1 .... ,• s. rArr-1-4, ,.._ P-1 DETENTION POND f : _Lir:: ,..r-zwii.._•-•43„;24111141., Allulf., . . :-'7.'. . :4:14,...'-4':;--•-•I.-.40-I"1I;•4i.•:1r—.4v111114lfri',1.-11%t r,ee ,-11--..,.',,. •_•`_ \. I ii lt• iII r4!t'M`..:.ga l —111-B-PS-_'4eh.....-._._ -/4•.,r 1•.'00•/7•-,__.._--. ••4•..,. :••• ''OVrW:-,i.,".,.W \2r,.. 'I.3.:.,1,-:-.4•..': •-_ - 'i-.;F•••, -70 l 1t - 0 /.. 4 .4• • - 44. sN,,,.., r.2.f.": •: 1\(,, • r i #0 . •• . •. \ lir i 414 ”-14:9 Pir , ii •-**01'• -. 14. er.--:-:::W---ii•rri„,,k•'t--6-*:p•-ii A .... ''',...f,,,,_ ,,,. -Ii_ ' ..-1-41:":10 Atik,,,90 Iri•el, 944 ''''-41'0.: (....1 4... 01•"4.1 i"'"1--\..ft,_,.,••.;•._,.0540,--, . . . ,,,7,,/i , 2. ,p, A ,,•6,, OFFICE . W --• N Cld- Ae ''''•114002k0V0P7P-41117‘*°' ' ‘1.' liii. 1 i , i i 1 I ' at Allt, I ITP grOk..r•C-2..... 50000•••• "IA' L.JI ,,---Viii,i„.0,,`PliP" 1111 ,,...., \ , ,. , 0 .1 c , .•,, : ..1.. ,.,.. ,, ..„- ;:4, :.1 .'- (111% Si- ! l'• PROsPoSED •114111 ii fi 4-A,04 - , \vast - % . V,I OFFICE figo" ., 4, . , A ••s•'1 ' / ' Vil •.‘,f 4 -,- •.--: , '.i ' 0.i. 'N. 1. 1,,,,,, : _..4. , ... r• ,,,,,, 4t.--- - v. ; ,01, - - 4‘,1040, Ir.- \, ,L „ ik -.., 1 --,,,,,N . y..,.. -09, v...„,,,,, „„tt,•„v ... • r-.,211, (1, • v.V % \ "1134 wtAIIDO'C"'".' ' . ' • s••-,:''-' •.360Witt1 :P 111' ...0 Cip , :-.-741111?.41 ' I .y.i.\ ,,i1 ..._e"0! • ''''' ,10%.?,''''' ' \ IV-. 11 "r-'il'..re.1. AZ . X 91 ' . -‘W \ 111*J61•1 fol.:I*. f%: f ,I. RI i .v-i.: :fp/. , it • Itplai ritir ., !----'' . •,,,' '''''''... 'N A .0•2 !I -1` ' •_,,:':,-‘•1•4 4"1 .÷: • ..d&i.v..eg- '''A'!''''''• r .1-.:v— ... . • . C I.-a -91 22`• Air* (C C,, 'ff. lif • tr" ''' -.... '... 1111i16--. .,1, 1-----.7,, rir,—,1-,' .I.K.) f•1:# . 63 - 63 aa , Al ,4 k_.• . i ' I A' 16 '' C-'.) - VO(2 i_,,,,; .94t,,.1t0,' '.-,6 - .-,',A;-, io= .: •<•.• E....- CM CD CO .4 7 TY ....J. 73 otii — it ,.... el..•-wee.. ..g.,.. -'.•' otAlil 'c.-, -I- ••;i' ..‘S .--;"Afiltialrir;'' O.- .0°.'`, (.r., '....-04z-, ;-'-'2•*.Olt IA fir AW7 .. •,---:'"-"--:---- •VIAPIF.kr...--71 , ''e tii• 14A, k*tigg:, It • ‘' _6_4C triA, i •-•••,.:Z.::...t.-: •(ifi ...-*,...4 •,.. L7Arfsf.,E, . . ,- .,.. wv-ati :AN A21.- 4.2•"0 . • .....:ttier,,,,,Ilie.::VA." • % 'lib' *, ..,:stri eie•t•iij •$••••••••, f., • • \.t..,611,„0444 it 4„ --AL' •S•••"•," .4, .ii; -.••• I • .g.--.-•::-.---...P . .. ' '.• 40 *4 f nr).:4; i-45;•'' ‘ "01. - ..-4., VA•:. 40 e>-'... I cv % bv,„61., eg • - t I ' ' 5*." ''' ''' .' :40-P7 •<1. -40:to P.,:t. az '...glitiL44-:,-;:tv=t. .0.- e-it• . ' • Atr,,, /4%, ' 1 ,A;704. •, cm CID 6:11 -, .vilio.. .?A., -7,- , * ' ...1.0', -..... ,•• A„.4,•:." ..,0 moral. ... ..dh ai• ' ' , ,•• -A.L. ,'S."' !'...911W '4. .2/,..4* ,-•• tar. '• • 00,9" db• e- ae.•• , . . %of'- - • .2•:.4",••'~' • ---704:"-iF.46....219-. Z.-.4twft. )11 / '' :.+e, 404 •:,r•VO •:ow?. - •--*.• '5 ..._..-6?-....w.t. • , --,....„.,,..., 4 te-it.. .4.-. io.,,, ... • • • :••••.. ...... ••%. Ilps ...IL ,..._, . • .„.z......._, ,...,.....„. ,, 0 •,...:!_v :.,,,,..• , OFFICE Jr- 4,....".4.r •• - , • .k - • '` ••••- •414$ ....•lb;.•.•i""•''''"-*. • '....--•.'Sp Jo\.411:.., \--...,..••• • .. • ••". ....10•:::---...k.. 4'.4 p .„.,,rie‘ E I-1 • ...\ . .. ..1,......T. ,.....7,.... .. .4,... ,........ I, .•..,..............:„:„..„,..,,,tb 4,.... __ ....„, _.,......„,... ...., ••••„ s... • c.„,,... ,••_-4*---- -i• ._ , .•__.,. 7.1. , f ANN 1:•:... iliz:‘,....., 8 0, 4151.0c , „•. . :...-•->d- ---- -. iiip.r_Aki *..P.• '-'' :,_ ::.*-7- 4.- \ a \ ,.... • ------) , ) 0 OFFICE METRO SEWAGE r•-"----r-- ( :).. •-•-' -4. :....:; .'-'44+!1&I.Isl' 4/s \ * 0%)2° VICINITY MAP . . . - TREATMENT PLANT ., Ni, • 'X 'U.' •• -.7.1. 1"=200' •-1. 1111kr'''' .,-1.-.. ''':164i;,,,... • 11.14014."of NORTH / .. ... . ..-. 01. • Ave: _ . - ,.. Architecture and Planning r r Ipn Pomeroy Northwest, Inc., Royce A. Berg,A,I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle;WA 98101 (206)583-8030 October 24, 1989 Ms. Jeannette Samek-McKague Department of Community Development Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Blackriver Corporate Park , OCT 2 Z 1989 ECF SA SM 071-88 (Phase VII L: 0 '' SA-109-89(Phase VIII) Li u U U NW 88041, 89017 Dear Jeannette: Per our meeting with you, Mark Miller and Jonathan Ives on 20 October, we have enclosed Phase VIII revised, Phase VII as revised and reviewed that day, and a project specific for Tract A, so the E. I.S. scope can be redefined. The E. I.S. draft would encompass Phase VIII (Burlington Northern Property) , per your recommendation, and Tract A. The phasing for buildings with areas of allocated parking and development per phase is noted on the sketches. If you have any questions, please call myself or Mark Miller. Lectful , 4 Roy a A. Berg Pre ident RAB:mp cc: Mark Miller Jonathan Ives Don Erickson enclosure (site sketches 1 and 2) • Susan Krom 3640 Ashworth Avenue North '� Seattle, WA 98103 SEP 2 7 1989 September 26, 1989 To: Shelly Anderson Dave Clark (KC Surface Water Management) C/"on Erickson (City of Renton) Nancy Laswell-Morris (City of Renton) Andy Levesque (KC Surface Water Management) Subject: FYI -- Water level in the P1 Pond (Renton Heron Rookery) For those of you who do not know me, I am the new volunteer who is overseeing the Renton Heron Rookery ( I stepped in when Shelly Anderson moved out of the area) . Because of concern expressed about the water level in the P1 Pond, I requested a statement from Ivan Lines , the original planner for the pond, to establish the correct water level and learn the rationale. Briefly, according to Mr. Lines : o The proper water level is dependant on the season: winter 0. 0 feet, summer 2. 0 feet (the forebay elevations can be found in an operation and maintenance manual for the pump plant) . o Rationale: Islands are designed for waterfowl use and the low flow channel is for fish passage. Summer drawdown period creates mudflats for wading birds and allwos for the development of emergent marshy areas . Recreates riparian habitat along the channel upstream of the forebay. Willows, iris , and other riparian-type plants have been planted at the water's edge. The success of these plantings is dependent on maintenance of the established water levels . A copy of Mr. Lines letter is attached. Please include me on any mailing lists that have to do with the rookery site. Also, if you need volunteers to appear at hearings , etc. , call me at the appropriate number below . S Susan Krom 393-2411 (7 am - 3 : 30 pm) 634-0222 (after 4 pm and message phone) Enclosure cc u.t_ Cb, • _ . ban�xicksD� Ah Lev UNITED STATES SOIL W. 920 Riverside, Rm. 360 DEPARTMENT OF . CONSERVATION Spokane, Wa. 99201-1080 AGRICULTURE SERVICE DATE: 9/22/89 Susan Krom 3640 Ashworth Ave: North Seattle , WA 98103 Dear Ms . Krom, The elevations of the P1 pump plant forebay were agreed to by the Soil Conservation Service , King County , City of Renton and other sponsors of the East-side Green River Watershed Project prior to building the pump plant in the early 1970 ' s . The elevations that were established at that time , 0.0 feet during the summer months and 2 .0 feet during the winter months, are necessary to successfully operate the pump plant and upstream channel system for flood control purposes . The forebay elevations are specified in an operation and maintenance manual for the pump plant which also covers all of the other operation and maintenance procedures . When the upper portion of the forebay was constructed we included several islands for waterfowl use and a low flow channel to provide for fish passage . These features were designed with the concurrence of the sponsors, the Departments of Fisheries and Wildlife and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service . The seasonal change in forebay elevations was a primary consideration when we designed the low flow channel and moats around the islands . The summer drawdown period creates mud flats for wading birds and allows the development of emergent marsh in portions of the forebay. We are also re-creating riparian habitat along the channel upstream of the forebay . Hundreds of riparian-type plants have been planted along the channel with many such as willows and iris planted at the waters edge . The growth and survival of these plants is dependent upon maintaining the agreed-to forebay elevation. If the forebay is kept either too high or too low during the growing season many of our plants will be killed . I believe that the design and operation of the forebay , in conjunction with the project sponsors , has been highly • successful . The population of the heron rookery has increased from a few nesting birds prior to the project to a present population of 60 to 70. Waterfowl are so abundant s- - in the forebay that we initially had difficulty establishing grass/ legume seedings on the islands . Sincerely , Ivan Lines , C.W.B. State Biologist cc-Joe Henry, SCS, Renton Rod Den-Herder, SCS, Renton Julian Meuer, SCS, Spokane ( j Susan Krom 3640 Ashworth Avenue North C73 g' Seattle, WA 98103 n SEP i 2 1989 September 12 , 1989 �s r !( ' .� Mr. Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Don, Over the weekend of September 9-10, a couple of new additions to the dumping took place in the the Pl Pond area -- surplus rubber coating for electrical power lines and approximately 10 loads of construction debris (asphalt and dirt) . This dumping took place in the northwestern section of the site . • Susan Krom 393-2411 (7 : 00 - 3 : 30 M-F) 634-0222 (after 4 p.m. ) • • f® CITY OF RENTON NIL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division January 15 1989 Ms. Susan Krom 3640 Ashworth Avenue North Seattle, Washington 98103. RE: Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase VII and VIII Plans Ref: Blackriver Corporate Park EIS - ECF-071-88 Dear Ms. Krom: This letter transmits a copy of drawings your recently requested during our recent meeting on the Blackriver site. The drawings depict the site plans, landscaping plans and elevations for the development proposed for Tracts A and B located on the south side of the P-1 Channel Forebay. These drawings are the basis for the EIS evaluation being done on Tracts A and B. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Jeanette Samek-McKague Senior Planner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 -S_SON6 V� 1\JCa . ,WAFk I-194.r)1\3r-6-\\A /. A )-9 I'"?"-b!") AcA\34-9yLizE Novszt--1— v..cq. s.t �,1' ET c , �a t�� b� ' y � i \_c Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 PLANNING DMSION CITY OF RENTON i-11 'JAN 9 1989 EEivE January 4, 1989 v Environmental Review Committee c/o Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Significance File No. : ECF;SA;SM-071-88 Black River Corporate Park, Phase VII Dear Mr. Erickson: As Metro staff has discussed with you, this letter contains our supplemental comments on the scope of the EIS for this project. We originally provided comments on the project in a December 5, 1988 letter to you. Public Transportation The environmental checklist for the project references a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) (see item B. 14 .g, page 13) . Metro recommends that, as part of the scope of the EIS, the project proponent be required to evaluate the impacts of that TMP. Based on that evaluation the City of Renton can then require appropriate revisions to the TMP to mitigate expected traffic impacts of Phase VII through Transportation System Management actions. Thank you for the opportunity to provide additional comments on this project. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:ymg cc. C. Thompson • $ 0 CITY OF RENTON "LL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION November 21, 1988 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations issued on November 16, 1988: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED EASTWAY CENTER - THE LEITZKE ARCHITECTS ECF;SA;SP-102-88 Applicant is seeking: 1) site plan approval to construct a commercial center to replace and expand upon an existing commercial structure; and 2) a special permit to prepare the parcel for new construction. The property is located at 3901 NE 4th Street. The fifteen (15) day comment period for this project will end on December 6, 1988. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASE VII ECF;SA;SM-071-88 Application for site plan approval and shorelines substantial development permit to allow the construction of a 7 story office building with approximately 285,000 sq.ft. of space within 200 feet of the P-1 Detention Pond. Project located north of SW 7th Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW and west of Naches Avenue SW and east of the P-1 Channel. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 • ' Environmental Determinations November 17, 1988 Page 2 Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Agencies, affected tribes and members of the public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS (see attached scoping notice). Comments must be submitted to the City of Renton by 5:00 p.m. on December 12, 1988. If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. S• ely, r Donal . Erickso , AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries DKE:mjp I• I ' NOTICE OF ENVIRONMEf� DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, Public Notice RENTON,WASHINGTON P-1 Channel. The Environmental Review Committee Further information regarding this action (ERC)has issued a Determination of Signif- Is available in the Community Development i icance for the following project: Department, Municipal Building, Renton, BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK • Washington, 235-2550, Agencies, tribes, i� PHASE VII(ECF;SA;SM�071.88) • and members of the public are Invited to AFFIDAVIT OF PURL! shorelineion s substantial develolan pmental arid comment on the scope of the EIS. Com- p permit ments must be submitted to the City of to allow construction of a 7 story office Renton by 5 p.m.on December 12,1988. Audrey Benner • building with approximately 285,000 sq. ft. Any appeal of the ERC action must be ,being first of space within 200 feet of the P-1 Deten- filed with the Rentor.Hearing Examiner by Um Pond. Project located north of SW 7th 5 p.m.on December 5,1988. that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the l Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW and Published November 21, 1988 Valley Daily west of Naches Avenue SW and east of the News R5149 Acct.#51087 VALLEY DAILY lv rn w 3 • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to;printed and published in'the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition , Renton Edition __ Auburn Edition ______-_, (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Public rto t i c e— was published on November 21, 1988 R5149 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 25 . 60 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 9 t hday of Nov 19 S 8 Notary blic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VON#87 Rev,sed 11 86 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Significance for the following project: BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASE VII ECF;SA;SM07:_1.-88_, Application-'for site plan approval and shorelines substantial development permit to allow construction of a 7 story office building with approximately 285, 000 sq. ft. of space within 200 feet of the P-1 Detention Pond. Project located north of SW 7th Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW and west of Naches Avenue SW and east of the P-1 Channel. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Buildling, Renton, Washington, 235-2550, Agencies, tribes, and members of the public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. Comments must be submitted to the City of Renton by 5 p.m. on December 12, 1988. Any appeal of the ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by 5 p.m. on December 5, 1988. Published: November 21, 1988 0 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION November 18 , 1988 Mark Miller First City Development Corporation 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 - Seattle, WA 98104 • RE: Black River Corporate Park - Phase VII ECF;SA;SM-071-88 Dear Mr. Miller: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of your Site Plan approval request for property located north of SW 7th Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW and west of Naches Avenue SW and east of the P-1 Channel. The Committee on November 16, 1988 decided toissue. a Determination of Significance because of unanswered questions regarding the following impacts of the proposed development on: ground hydrology and nearby wetlands; water quality, particularly in regard to the capacity of the existing drainage ditch to handle runoff from the site as well as that of the plus or minus thirty (30) acres of impervious surfaces to the southeast of the site; flora and fauna, particularly in regard to the Heron and other waterfowl in the area and sources of food for these species whether plant or animal; light, glare, and noise as it potentially affects wildlife species; and traffic impacts. Because the Environmental Review -Committee issued a Determination of Significance, an official scoping notice is being circulated. There is a twenty-one (21) day comment period during which comments are solicited from Various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee' s decision. The comment period will end December 12 , 1988 . Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it' s selection of appropriate consulting firms to prepare the required. Environmental Impact Statement on the project and coordinate the final selection with the applicant. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 You may appeal this Determination of Significance in writing pursuant to RMC-4-3016 accompanied by a $75. 00 appeal fee no later than 5: 00 PM, December 5, 1988 , to: Renton Hearing Examiner 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the above office to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our, office at 235-2550 and ask for myself or Jeannette Samek-McKague. For the Environmental Review Committee, C17Y:fitak- . Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: Tim Krause Office of Richard Arambune 505 Madison Street, Suite 209( Seattle, WA 98104 Royce A. Berg LPN Architects 1127 Pine Street, Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98101 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON SCOPE OF EIS File Numbers: ECF;SA;SM-071-88 Description of proposal: Application for site plan approval and shorelines substantial development permit to allow construction of a 7 story office building with approximately 285, 000 sq. ft. of space within 200 feet of the P-1 Detention Pond. Proponent: Black River Corporate Park - Phase VII Location of proposal: North of SW 7th Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW and west of Naches Avenue SW and east of the P-1 Channel. EIS required. The lead agency has determined this proposal '' is likely to have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) and will be prepared. An environmental checklist or other materials indicating likely environmental impacts can be reviewed at our offices. Lead agency: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton The lead agency has identified the following areas for discussion in the EIS: 1) ground hydrology and nearby wetlands; 2) water quality, particularly in regard to the capacity of the existing drainage ditch to handle runoff from the site as well as that of the plus or minus thirty (30) acres of impervious surfaces to the southeast of the site; 3) flora and fauna, particularly in regard to the Heron and other waterfowl in the area and sources of food for these species, whether plant or animal; 4) light, glare, and noise as it potentially affects wildlife species (including Heron) ; and '5) traffic impacts. Scoping. Agencies, affected tribes, and members of the public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. You may comment on alternatives, mitigation measures, probable significant adverse impacts, and licenses or other approvals that may be required. Your commments must be submitted in writing and received before December 12, 1988. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 206-235-2550 Appeal: You may appeal this determination of significance in writing pursuant to RMC-4-3016 accompanied by a $75. 00 appeal fee no later than 5: 00 PM, December 5, 1988, to: Renton Hearing Examiner 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, 4A 98055 You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the above office to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. � e Determination of Significance Request for Comments on Scope of EIS Black River Corporate Park - Phase VII Page 2 Publication Date: November 21, 1988 Date of Decision: November 1 1988 � G 16. / Ronald G. Nelson L nger Building Dir or anni Ma ager Nybe g Acting is s--Drirect • N oT E ENVIRONMENTAL DEcLARATIoN APPLICATION NO. ECF-071-88, SA-071-88, SM-071-88 APPLICANT BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASE VII PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND SHORELINES SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 7 STORY OFFICE BUILDING WITH APPROXIMATELY 285, 000 SQ. FT. OF SPACE WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE P-1 DETENTION POND. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS NORTH OF SW 7TH STREET AND OAKESDALE AVENUE SW AND WEST OF NACHES AVENUE SW AND EAST OF THE P-1 CHANNEL. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION I><1 DOES DOES NOT • HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 1><] WILL . WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., DECEMBER 5, 1988 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. SA- 671_ ,4ct a.t (ema (61-(--(26-)0 T0: sbevtil c/5cJyj d PLEASE CALL J 7 FROM: 9Qtaig� 0 FOR YOUR INFORMATION �? ❑ FOR ACTION DATE: 1 - 61/4TIME: ❑ FOR APPROVAL 0 FOR SIGNATURE RE: 44.7560 0 YOUR RECOMMENDATION r PER OUR CONVERSATION PHONE # : C�4/ ❑ PER YOUR REQUEST I V'� DEvPt,°DM f'LAMING 0 READ AND RETURN COMMENTS : ( Tv fl gENTON 0 READ AND ROUTE TO FILES CI ATTACH MATERIAL & RETURN , FEB - 91993 ❑ FORWARD TO . I p) Is{ —lb."— . ar H445RTCROWSER Hart Crowser,Inc. 1970 Fairview Avenue East Seattle,Washington 981023699 FAX 206.328.5587 206.324.9530 Earth and Environmental Technologies MEMORANDUM To: Amy Kosterlitz, Buck and Gordon (FAX 626-0675) Dean Erickson, First City (FAX 382-9752) From: Clay Patmont, Hart Crowser, Inc. Date: July 18, 1991 Subject: Response to Gail Colburn's June 10, 1991 letter to City of Renton regarding cleanup of hazardous substances at Black River Corporate Park, Tract A. Job No.: J-3276 Gail Colburn's letter described some perceived inaccuracies in the final EIS for the project, and also presented additional comments pertaining to the mitigation document. Both sets of comments were based on application of the Washington State Model Toxics Control Act (Chapter 173-340 WAC) to Tract A. Briefly, her comments center around two issues: 1) appropriate cleanup standards; and 2) selection of cleanup remedies. Both of these issues are addressed below. Cleanup Standards. We concur with her comment that maximum concentrations of cadmium, chromium, zinc, and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), as well as nickel, exceed preliminary MTCA cleanup standards. The preliminary standards in this case are based on tabularized Method A values, if available, supplemented with Method B standards derived using preliminary worst-case "default" assumptions. Both the Method A and Method B preliminary standards are based on reasonable maximum exposures anticipated under residential settings, and consider direct soil contact, dust emission and inhalation, plant protection, wildlife protection, and groundwater protection. The most restrictive of these potential exposure pathways forms the basis for the preliminary standards. Seattle,Tacoma,Richland,Anchorage,Portland,San Francisco,Long Beach fm Air MEMORANDUM J-3276 July 19, 1991 Page 2 As discussed in our June, 1991 Site Characterization report, a consideration of statistical compliance provisions of the MTCA (WAC 173-340-740[7]) reveals that only the concentrations of cadmium present at the site exceed the Method A cleanup standard of 2 parts-per-million (ppm). Even though the maximum concentrations of the other chemicals slightly exceeded the preliminary standards, the overall concentrations present at the site are nevertheless sufficiently low to demonstrate compliance with the MTCA standards. The Method A standard for cadmium (2 ppm) was based on Ecology's worst-case analysis of plant protection requirements. However, a more detailed site-specific Method B analysis indicates that plants within the area of cadmium contamination are not adversely affected by existing cadmium levels. In fact, all "surface" risks posed by cadmium present in site soils (e.g., due to direct soil contact, dust inhalation, plant protection, and wildlife protection) are well below MTCA (and EPA) risk targets. The only potential concern identified with hazardous substances present at Tract A, based on an MTCA (Method B) cleanup standard analysis, is protection of local groundwater to support possible future use as drinking water. However, no such use of local groundwaters presently occurs. Based on leaching test results and MTCA procedures, a cadmium cleanup standard of approximately 7.5 ppm can be derived which is protective of groundwater supplies. Approximately 2,000 to 3,000 cubic yards of soil at the site exceeds this standard. It should be noted, however, that - degradation of the local groundwater system has not been documented. The groundwater protection analysis and associated cleanup standard in this case thus represents a worst-case condition. Cleanup Remedy Selection. Ecology's preferences for cleanup technologies, as reiterated in Gail's letter, were discussed in considerable detail during our prior May 15, 1991 meeting with Ecology. The top priority technology, reuse or recycling, is not feasible. The second priority, destruction or detoxification, is still in the research and development stage for treatment of low-level cadmium soils, and is by no means a proven technology at this point. Preliminary evaluations of this technology also indicate a very high cost. Soil treatment is likely infeasible, and certainly impracticable at this site. The third priority, which involves separation followed by reuse, recycling, destruction, or detoxification, is likewise not feasible. A LI MEMORANDUM J-3276 July 19, 1991 Page 3 Immobilization, or stabilization, of soil is the highest preferred technology which is technically feasible to implement at this site, though the practicability of this technology is questionable (see below). Since the next priority technology, off-site disposal, is associated with a higher cost than stabilization, this technology would not be retained for further consideration under a MTCA feasibility study. The next (sixth) priority technology is capping, which has generally been accepted as a minimum condition of this project. Finally, the lowest priority technology is institutional controls. The cleanup remedy analysis in this case thus boils down to a comparative evaluation of stabilization versus capping, consistent with MTCA requirements. Selection between these two alternatives was discussed during our previous meeting with Ecology, and it was generally agreed during that discussion that the stabilization alternative could be ruled out because of impracticability. The basis for this determination is summarized below: o The site poses no human health or ecological risk under its current configuration and use, and would not pose any "surface" risk under hypothetical future worst-case site use conditions; o Leachate generated from the contaminated soils must migrate through approximately 10 feet of low permeable silts and clays before reaching the first saturated groundwater zone which could potentially be used for water supply (and where MTCA groundwater cleanup standards would apply). It is likely that cadmium concentrations would be attenuated to harmless levels during such transport; o The receptor of potential groundwater migration of cadmium from the site (the P-1 Pond) contains cadmium concentrations which are equivalent to those potentially present in groundwaters on-site. The net environmental protection resulting from soil cleanup, therefore, is minimal. The source of the on-site cadmium contamination also originated in the P-1 Pond sediments; o The cost of soil stabilization at Tract A is approximately 6 to 9 times higher than an impermeable cap, though potential cadmium releases resulting from both alternatives are similar; and a' MEMORANDUM J-3276 July 19, 1991 Page 4 o Selection of a cap to remediate hazardous substance risks at this site is consistent with Ecology's decisions at other similar sites Even though capping would likely be the preferred technology for cleanup, Ecology stated that it may be prudent not to locate buildings and structures over the contaminated area so as not to preclude any future actions. If this condition results in a substantial increase in project costs, it may be advisable to consider stabilization of the soils, since this remedy would be the obvious highest preference technology. Construction could then occur without further restriction. SP-01I ; DEVELOPMENT PLANNING } /�7K� !'ITV r1C pcMITr1J BUCK & 902 WATERFRONT PLACE • 1011 WESTERN AVENUE JUL2 7 1293 SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104-1097 GORDON (206)382-9540 • FACSIMILE(206)626-0675 ATTORNEYS AT LAW _ PETER L.BUCK l�d V '(J OF COUNSEL BRENT CARSON JAY P.DERR ALISON D.BIRMINGHAM JOEL M.GORDON MADELEINE A.F.BRENNER SHELLEY E.KNEIP AMY L.KOSTERLITZ PROJECT MANAGER KEITH E.MOXON July 22, 1993 KATHRYN A.GARDOW,P.E. Mr. Don Erickson Zoning Administrator Development Services City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Blackriver Corporate Park -- Errata Request and Interpretation Dear Don: . As we discussed on the phone earlier this week, I am herewith submitting my request for zoning code changes in the City's Errata process. The Errata changes agreed upon are to add as administrative conditional uses outdoor storage, and the ability to waive the 33% limit on parking garages and accessory indoor storage if impacts are appropriately dealt with. We also agreed upon the addition of interior storage which is a part of a mixed use office/light industrial complex as a permitted secondary use. If these changes are made through the Errata process, then your draft code interpretation can be revised to deal solely with warehousing, product servicing and wholesaling, and then reissued. Your draft interpretation indicates that these uses would be within the definition of uses currently allowed under the code and we concur with this. As I mentioned, I have spoken with both Larry Warren and Kay Shoudy who concur with your running these changes through the errata process on behalf of the City of Renton. The only remaining issue is the matter of the "existing use" provision which we understood the City was going to be putting into the code to generally vest property with existing site plan approvals or extensions thereof. We agreed with Larry and Kay at our meeting that such an "existing use" provision would allow vesting to the prior OP zoning for the existing site plan approvals for the Blackriver Corporate Park and any extensions thereof, as well as any application for the same or a similar site plan made prior to the lapse of an approved site plan. If this "existing use" section has not been put in the code, we also request that this be done through the Errata process. I have proposed some language to be Mr. Don Erickson - 2 - July 22, 1993 added to the code in my May 11 letter, Section 2 (see attached), and reiterated this on the Errata request form. We appreciate your assistance. Please let me know if there are additional things we need to do to assist with the Errata process or any meetings we should attend. We may also need to discuss the provision for "grandfathering" site plan approvals. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Very truly yours, VOStM15- Amy L. terlitz Enclosure cc: Dean Erickson Kay Shoudy Larry Warren FCI7501107203.ALK .x f r BUCK l�1 K & 902 WATERFRONT PLACE • 1011 WESTERN AVENUE GORDON SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104-1097 (206)382-9540• FAcsuuLE(206)626-0675 ATTORNEYS AT LAW PETER L.BUCK OF COUNSEL BRENT CARSON ALISON D.BIRMINGHAM JAY P.DERR MADELEINE A.F.BRENNER JOEL M.GORDON SHELLEY E.KNEIP AMY L.KOSTERLIIZ PROJECT MANAGER KEITH E.MOXON May 11, 1993 KATHRYN A.GARDOW RE. 1993 Ms. Mary Lynne Meyer Long Range Planning Manager Long Range Planning and Technical Services City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Follow Up to May 5 Meeting re: Blackriver Corporate Park Dear Mary Lynne: This letter is in followup to our meeting of May 5 with you, Kay, Larry, Jay and the Mayor, to finalize the approach regarding several zoning issues raised by the City's proposed CO zoning. In accordance with Larry Warren's memo of May 3, 1993, as refined by our discussion at the meeting, my understanding of how we will resolve matters is.as follows: 1) The proposed RC zoning on the Blackriver Corporate parcels under option to the City would be changed to CO zoning (it appeared from a draft map we viewed that this had already occurred). , a51,1 The City will insert language in the CO zone to indicate that existing buildings and site plan approvals, including extensions thereof, and timely applications for similar site plan approvals will be treated as existing uses vested to the prior "OP" zoning. You suggested that we propose some language, and so I have drafted the following proposed addition to the CO zone: Existing Use Designation: Property located within the CO zone shall be given an existing use designation, which designation will vest that property to the prior OP zoning regulations, if the property has one or more of the following: . (a) Existing buildings and uses, buildings under construction, and expansion of existing buildings or uses; or Ms. Mary Lynne Meyer - 2 - May 11, 1993 (b) The property has an existing site plan, or any extension of the site plan, as well as any same or similar site plan for which application has been made prior to the lapse of an approved site plan, which application is diligently pursued. 3) The City will_issue an administrative interpretation that warehousing, product servicing,:wholesaling a td storage are allowed without limitation if part of a permitted use. We would'a eciate"having a copy of this interpretation as soon as possible. 4) The City will insert language into the CO zone to allow accessory storage and parking garages to exceed the 33% limitation by administrative conditional use permit. 5) The City will insert language into the CO zone to allow necessary and associated outdoor storage, if appropriately screened, as an administrative conditional use subject to some reasonable square footage limit (which the City will check with First City prior to finalizing). 6) Any other issues between the City and Blackriver Corporate Park will be handled by a letter of understanding or administrative interpretation. This would serve to limit the number of textual changes to the Zoning Code and yet give Blackriver Corporate Park the assurances that it wants. We very much appreciate you, Kay, Larry and Jay taking the time to resolve these issues. If I have misunderstood or omitted anything please let me know as soon as possible as I will be gone the last two weeks of May. We look forward to hearing from you on this as soon as possible. If you cannot reach me, please call Dean Erickson at 624-9223. Very truly yours, Amy Gosterlitz cc Dean Erickson Kay Shoudy Larry Warren Jay Covington FC 7S011LQS1QLALK P, 03 JUL-19-93 MON 14:45 FIRST CITY FAX NO. 2063829752 CITY OF RENTON Application for Review: Interim Land Use Plan, Areawide Zoning and Zoning Code The purpose of this application is to allow individuals to raise issues which may not have been noticed or considered in the process of adopting the rnreritn Land Use Plan,Areawide Zoning,or Zoning Code. This review will allow consideration of these issues and preparation of amendments,if deemed necessary by the City Council,prior to adoption of the final Comprehensive Plan in July, 1994. Applications may be submit ted to the PlanningBuilding/PubIic Works Department, 200 Mill Avenue So., from June 15, 1993,until April 1, 1994. • "- Application Date: July 20, 1993 Name: First City Washington c/o Amy L. Kosterlitz Address: 902 Waterfront Place 1011 Western Avenue Telephone: Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 382-9540 • Location of Property: Blackriver Corporate Park • Request for Consideration: (Attach additional information if you wish) • See attached. • `..r..............}.:i•....,•..•.,,tow:..s.{.•.r,. :.:x•' _•�Fxu-04xa: ie;4as;'r'.eiow"<aw:'f,{e 'Y . x}' • "••• ^..`.•k`,•a ai: •...'+"4y`: i4fue%c•'.$ii:'1�' x.{4`+':ff:C;'%.Y.u•x.:a.:ae�ke'':.,•Y i}[•i«i�r'{.#5.�''''ik•�:•r '"• ,{ i'x..{•}:•..H's''�• M' • :•'a`'x`• 5.'b., ,w .2 ':�:•H:G9:4%.}XaM.•"'{t;:?'�:r.}� ;s�4e•>x•• K..k .r.•xaou.:.x:f�.X:�:rv•win:;:.•ej.,.iee::°.�i{e,ua.. �f�&b•� •�% X:a or" } .,! �i e �xx:3: :;,. a}x 4: ;' c'4>C4;y',2' ` •!:sQ•, ... >k; ;r>'g�k'S'�1,..,,;.z t>.•rs;+ • � 3ESlb �is?Rx,:azM's:YiB a&i: ><o �n � r . •.,s, ?�; $• x an 7'0.,•., i L�)hui: i<a,,,,�� N•�(� !,Rdd:R. 'CA�i�x lC� '�. 4ag'.KilhKRk�R>YY2:Rs1'��' 4,R' •.•R.rr.�4, a.<.}:• '.s'S ?r�GRk• •e ::i�r .,.`•a:.�:::i•}r:R�i:•.Y;+;'::x{i{xi {k,��',�.4ax�{;C�..d,�wX{ i::w�f:•�:io>:.;ax.wwww�x Mc;Z.L�'•' � •,� K t sx{w 5 w,X.xa%i•x } a f Yx•.ua•w : i I'"!.w, ro!Y:x• ?: t's 6XR: %{i x: 7l� R,}l1 �L::kO deteft r.ilik :t's e2: .:da. .;,,r�'a.:: :•.:•{a}:tear<>i.'s`•`4.[.'R}�: Rai{;:<°x kit. i t R ka 0 Oxus. p.• :.•R4.k.4•s+•;ix .R w:�R'7:. ,'`i. X $}sS•`'X.4eia:F 3�R'.<•x,.k�e• S'•4 w:• 4 •:a'f'.k�.Y4X R,'s�k.'r VP. > ;}..:,s,l:Fi!}}s:4.•sR4ti¢;'.w$�•7fW,•,i„u•Y F'�'a�':r '�vi:4?ij#w�:d:<..;.,4J'3a'd�r.x:akaan:.�..::%aaxs:,�ra�>3;x.:8}x4e��.YiC;!!k'4!�y�'#•rsv«�'� ;Li+:'' %Xa�•`� �TLh '+4` 4'x:x::;Ae4a::Rki:eii i.7f''Va 5�{• ,,e g+/ ,,¢�il<SkiCki::iw•4(,a(+%•¢ '• xt7ak;.x4:as: Y•x'Y`t "}Y+?`RXt}•R> 'L < •RY;y4 A��te;till'•�.:{S\{4::'a'4!}:{•%,i�?:iiat,4,::!}�a:,a,.f' ����+,�•�•f••,••}'n•r.,M•YiV 4!wxa}}X•:v}N;•.'Ra lCfi�RyC)Pna^.�},'a�•T:��S:{ .}. i1 r.M.Sr�pwf•H{ }::.v...,•:}w}>' -r,ar:v^.a}i}:44Y.4>:ii4:4:1.•n.�•.,...• f.\wi:.•..,n,'�'•.•i�{'{,,}:•x4:<i4}i:•ww:4}S •SVf i{.x..,,R",:,Ki h�iia.{, %•%4X•S },f " S,-0rL•T%•X{4a} K:•u.•:::v}••:«;}p}.t.K.y::{•.:y .,$: .•t. h•'K.,•xaaw}X,•a�:,w i'S.F.LJnRri'.r:Ye}x T,:k , xa. iw>}:o}:•:o-'•+xfj74�Ye,:`:4••:on__........4;C4;C€ti%�F '':Ya .axi s;r: xRs;.r„a,: :a:u•�:".'.`'�: t::'°i{;>•'sx',r�x".,• .,'' ,•X;t•:R�ssisr:r.{�t•:'•q'• `•�.'rr• f is:4:•:4w}:,:•: •�,tu,:.4xak,:..:..:..•: , :4}.. ••,K+s4' .'}, «4wr...•.}7•If,�:a:a�:�..:}.4ax,K••i::: 'S' ox:.w: #'dS»w'.ar:x4sx• ,YNr• d$4�> ,::y4x�,:7'y`'+•'+i •:i:x'?�';';C}i%,�}.;}�.. �w ';',`'#°'�£+'i:iS•�sxh46 tb .•.{>.{}.u4}�.::IS...i •'�2:lL ':,.a.,. r'ax.�i':4�s}'�•"o-'�,,x4':x•x+. f „%}'�y'', ; W%%•k'�,{� �4 i.{A:}::K': }fOiui.•..R<':.••'�i. ;•,•o `i'" `�ffr vP��S {:`� ,,,.t,. :�Wlt ,a��,C�# XN•{ •¢�s:dAf4b :xfsxs•. {4'•:;sR: :w.co: Xa:•:okY.`%}:: R'.'Y >•' w�•�Y, [, x•,.v::.,,;:']+per ,2•SdtR R Xr k •.,<i:K4y}! .:a:.,;; �:`ati>G:.+:a:K•r u"'�, s..: s,:}.eb :r�isY.'d:a.d. 4n%-q 7 .<b:�tii•• R'�n `;xd X•}...xa{a:,•.,;.,:. i.3{.i°;rx.ss;Kofi•x:•l.' :7•.."sa.. �,�" Y w�£3•..: y.x•`:4f4ixas. '#7'kr�x.xFi$.;•"i,,,,,• tvx xa^e-t xx'CC.Ty",, 4s'' •rRa !'tf�:+�: "K'} f�:74s:{/Siw 'ti "Y p:�.:6:''•eFe xxx S;> Y: � .t::1tS:�sJR}Y:�.d zxrr. > ,,�,§,: 'lit S.7l.h'•$:i�:x..a o'.w:J•!}:4.r:..'.Y.%i:x _." •• e 1. •,s�''f,:�C%r•7.:. ate'," w.+. xw ra':'y. :.a: .1�rwk li' :, t xe.0•,K: 3. tl.'v41',<'�SF', f.s .,�,•oq r,A: Y• oxYtge;'c::ok ,�akxw:. ,:s :###R:. .• •'YYr; ,,.�r:x a:a:LSsf°F.�"i'^ar ,,}ba.,•.µsti}:r:p}:}'�.r..nr�-.,- -i;e 'fi R'i eii�'>y 31,;��i.r... �b;'•r,"•'r,.°"'�.a��f.:4.z R.T{s'a• "r4 r:9}�'Y.•:-�;`;SG.•:} v,:lr y e Y� i:ixe••r:ua:t}s}`. ,4:.r.+ .,r.4',r ia:°fii ,e••f!•r. •wfs. O`Y,f}>��: ..\.. rS;}r5: ..i r{�'i�:.,i:,.R y rG .+.a.K'e <ikl�l:a; .,.�•. '.S:(a nS.''T•":'e:Ae: :'+ie4ie`,:;5.: `P.ycz�:?R'�g{.x�•+:eL« L ''�%X�:isiti{Ztik•:a}..�e•%•x:�K. .<2,,eb.l,•�x x'�•3w>sG... 'ate �k.^w��,,��'Y X f9�"},Yb}:6:0:{�:i:aT:SalSfxM+kti•kve}vr\v.J !i,:.aa• ••S'f•%af�:5%•%N.•}SW/.b}jY.4:�Y4W nYLY{i+,{J"'�i.4 }a44/Gi:n6.i+�,{$t?}J,�.,,} .,7,:,Ky:.:..:;xu .r:�.C?:�9+G:F:t•q.�n'aw akY,�.4%3'+le+.t•S:G�.n ��. .l.'•1v.•:aa}}:!.„a:ox,i�. j.7.ye.%4%;w.'�ax•:•x•i}%{s.: 'Sii.Y.<: 3'ie•!:<.:40:4.<... ••,p•;:•K,s:ar..x{ '�>,ici1••n.x4!:ass:,:'' :w:,::•:"ko:C:4Y.aY%ax '�arxar s fi:.K,tarho-x•a% ,^vs,,. :,}.ww:u•:h:ra•.�:•.• F x ik.ax:h ws}+9+i:'�.:•:•..,,.}.i...•..•.,,::i.. Ri. 'i• ,# iiK4 w.H3,Lw:s;• :s:itw his'S F<:a K:}:4a�s :$ t�:+e ta:N�zk cam-4ot. # 04 x3a�v,roiR. •'. ai'fix. is6a',:i3�1A,$•aa::a'ixxss'••M'.aa>x"E•.'T'ax`ek:i.a`�.'•a;w.�.;,�'pp} A •#•�•.�`}:a!:.,.........�'o:'.i'X•».: y _ �'#%±�'i;Sc•:.sa+nw+.�l,F,a1.}roy " �✓Y >;:�uia`,s°}...': •{y'.: K:•:i{;{2.}:{i•A:{o}'..i1:ryi'LPYrr�}h;.faN ai5a.}h,Ris•,ir�..:: :a:aw•} �'::,•.T,•,T•,�C.+...,•: 4} w•.n:ti1}:v ':7•" Yytrw:.¢s!. ::ytR• :i �...$,�\. .:� <•Y,.?4A,}.:::::>C• i� .x•sta,:8. ^:Y•s7`:r:.:. s4,:+., .a.dt�fftk@.:YI�S'fia•U'>.ksF•'.:w{.a". 'FY• i:F`R+rA��3.s , .dG X xi .>s:s:R%R s!x rx< R: i, u a��,<rwrfea.:wR g i� Ki tti3'{'.Y3>:soYsk � i:;;'•Ra§.K:a4�':s a:•xe: w�R•x,: .:c s:.-rxa,e: e!.!:!•''••x, .>. ::.. ':aaxb.�fx •s.'•.,+iaK.w:i4' x• .e ,e. ex�•ro-'ii:;:<4;`.t:esti,::{a:o:}Re<R�'sS:R .d}.i.,k :, .r.4..:a>x.xo•a•., �isK:}a}si ;i,•.r.,..,, w}}Yr..•,.r: : .wi yea �ikikf.�a;4 +••sxsawi.'iii>•i}:a >:r.+•.k�Mxa,��•x.{<aw}!.,,�5:•iR;R.'. : .wxS#R. 'We'+ � CxX{a;¢.?e •+s{ '•: J, x;.'+:'k:�•3�!'ww>•G+b:kawx:sr: X•i•Y;si:✓`.`'ti.$vM4kxeyKi:av y{ yX, Yd' .,.•x 9b•:ei:'•i?';:s`:i>n4:C•'.•ui:.RA!Y4tY.•i�.t•:,<h nK ,.`ea<ri:x..; :<�:�:a}}ruv)40.'xL,,.�.,pre}x•s:'�• •a}. A:Y • •'Y, fR•AFi7`4F„T. : :},{axe{o}!a f•,•w}}ssx w>:aYR::::k:s:x$•.7{r�;'nv°'a,`:.¢:•�''a,Z?hxh<y�:yM• .}:a.Ras.?rj ...•• ::$?3;3i3�:jKi•;a;?,•u.,,,a�.R:icb:•}''art-'S•: kLS.,S.i.�Raw:�°•.• :tea,..r ',•e•1...;::r..,.. • REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION IN ERRATA PROCESS: A. Include in the CO zone as administrative conditional uses: 1) Outdoor storage if associated with a permitted use and if appropriately screened. 2) Indoor storage accessory to a permitted use will be allowed to exceed the 33% of gross floor area limit as a conditional use where adverse impacts are appropriately mitigated. 3) Accessory parking garages will be allowed to exceed the 33% of gross floor area limit as a conditional use where adverse impacts are appropriately mitigated. B. Include in CO zone as an outright permitted secondary use: 1) Indoor storage if part of a mixed office/light industrial or mixed office/manufacturing complex. C. If City has not already enacted the provision grandfathering site plan approvals, we ask that the following language be inserted in the code through the errata process: Existing Use Designation: Property located within the CO zone shall be given an existing use designation, which designation will vest that property to the prior OP zoning regulations, if the property has one or more of the following: (a) Existing buildings and uses, buildings under construction, and expansion of existing buildings or uses; or (b) The property has an existing site plan, or any extension of the site plan, as well as any same or similar site plan for which application has been made prior to the lapse of an approved site plan, which application is diligently pursued. FC175011007203.ALK 3- LC1 sn,; , CITY RENT • Planning/Building/Public Works Departments '' Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Gnttmann,AdminLstrator'= • July 16, 1993 Ms. Amy L. Kosterlitz Buck&Gordon, Attorneys at Law ='�- 902 Waterfront Place 1011 Western Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-1097 SUBJECT: Blackriver Corporate Park Commercial Office (CO) Uses Dear Ms. Kosterlitz: Thank you for your letter of June 22, 1993 which arrived while I was on vacation. I was finally able to get my hands on Larry Warren's May 3, 1993 memorandum to Jay Covington. As I understand it the question you have raised pertains to Item 3 in Larry Warren's memorandum, that is, whether "warehousing, product servicing, wholesaling and storage are allowed if part of a permitted use." After • reviewing the June 7, 1993 version of the Commercial Office Zone it appears that some of these uses are permitted and others are not. For example, "any outdoor storage or display of materials or products" would be a prohibited use as listed in Sub-section C. Prohibited and Unclassified Uses. This would appear to rule out such uses even by administrative or hearing examiner conditional use permit. Warehousing would appear to be a normal ancillary use to Manufacturing, assembling and packaging of articles, products or merchandise from pre-processed natural or synthetic material(B.2.e) (3)). Product servicing would appear to be allowed under the category "General business services"(B.1.b) since you indicate that it would be "part of a permitted use". Wholesaling would also appear to be allowed if it was contained in the principal building (C.3.) and ancillary to the principal use, which I assume in this case would be some form of one of the permitted Light industrial uses (B.2.e.)). Interior storage would also appear to be permitted as an accessory use to Manufacturing, assembling and packaging of articles, products or merchandise from pre-processed natural or synthetic materials (2.e)(3)), a permitted light industrial use if it did not exceed thirty-three percent (33%) of the gross floor area. Parking garages are permitted as Accessory Uses (B.3.b)), in the Commercial Office Zone. I'. This is an administrative interpretation that is appealable within fourteen (14) days to the Hearing Examiner along with a $75.00 filing fee pursuant to Section 4-8-11.B. of the City's Building Regulations. If you have any questions or wish clarification please let me know. I can be contacted at 277-6181. Si rely, r qi Donald K. Erickson,AICP • Zoning Administrator I 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 40 :0j' CITY- O ' RE TON F` . � •i ifs. . Office of the City Attorney Earl Clymer, Mayor Lawrence J. Warren MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIVISION cITV r p gpnIT- I To: Jay Covington, Mayor's Executive Assistant MAY 5 1993 Kay Shoudy, Planning& Technical Services Director Mary Lynne Myer, Principal Planner ° �'C E D From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date: May 3, 1993 Subject: Black River Corporate Park During-our April 29, 1993 meeting we discussed the concerns of Black River Corporate Park as it relates to the new Zoning Code. We decided on the following approaches: 1. The RC Zoning for the optioned parcels would be changed from RC to CO. Additionally, the city would propose to agree with Black River that the option parcels, should they be acquired by the city over the next several years, would be acquired as if the old OP zoning was still on the property. 2. The city would give the Black River Corporate Park property an existing use designation and indicate that it applies not only to the constructed buildings but also to any site plan now in existence or any extension of the site plan, as well as to any same or similar site plan „ - for which application had been made prior to the lapse of an approved site plan and diligently pursued. 3. The city would issue an administrative interpretation that warehousing, product servicing, wholesaling and storage are allowed if part of a permitted use. 4: Cxpansron of out____doo`storaand garages over 33% of the gross floor area would be by admrrustrative or hearing examiner conditional use permit. 5. Any other issues between the city and Black River Corporate Park would be handled by a letter of understanding or administrative interpretation. This would serve to limit the number of textual changes in the Zoning Code and yet give Black River Corporate Park the assurances that it wants. If you have anything to add to this memo, or any corrections or clarifications please let me know. Lawrence J. arren LJW:as. cc: Mayor Earl Clymer A8:97:26. I . Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206)255-8678 • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING C'TY OF RENTON BUCK & JUG 2 3 902 WATERFRONT PLACE • 1011 WESTERN AVENUE 1993 SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104-1097 GORDON (206)382-9540 • FACSIMILE(206)626-0675 ATTORNEYS AT LAW ED RECEIV PETER L.BUCK RECEIVED 3� OF COUNSEL BRENT CARSON ALISON D.BIRMINGHAM JAY P.DERR MADELEINE A.F. BRENNER JOEL M.GORDON SHELLEY E.KNEIP PROJECT MANAGER AMY L.KOSTERLITZ KEITH E.MOXON KATHRYN A.GARDOW,P.E. June 22, 1993 Mr. Don Erickson Zoning Administrator Development Services City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Blackriver Corporate Park Dear Don: As we unfortunately keep missing each other by phone, I thought I would send you a brief note explaining our requests. First, pursuant to an agreement with the City through meetings with Jay Covington, Kay Shoudy, Mary Lynn Meyer and Larry Warren, it was agreed that rather than amend the City's new CO zoning to include some uses formerly allowed in the OP zone, the City would issue an administrative interpretation of its CO zone that "warehousing, product servicing, wholesaling and storage are allowed if part of a permitted use." See the memo of Larry Warren to Jay, Kay and Mary Lynn dated May 3, 1993. My understanding is that the City has determined that you are the appropriate person to issue the administrative interpretation of the code. We are very anxious to get this interpretation issued. If you have any questions about it, please feel free to call me or, as I have said, the above-mentioned City folks are very familiar with what was intended for the administrative interpretation. The second issue is that, while we understand that you have issued a general extension for all permits until the end of December of this year, First City Washington will probably need to go ahead and begin the process for getting a new shoreline permit approved for Phase 6 of the Blackriver Corporate Park, so that when the extension expires, it will have r• Mr. Don Erickson - 2 - June 22, 1993 its new permit ready. Obviously, if you plan additional extensions, this would not be necessary. Please let us know your thoughts on this and how to obtain the new permit. Very truly yours, Amy L. ' erlitz cc: Dean Erickson Jay Covington Kay Shoudy Mary Lynn Meyer Larry Warren FC175011I.06213.ALK �Y ~ DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 'CITY OF IIENTON BUCK & JUG 31993 902 WATERFRONT PLACE • 1011 WESTERN AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104-1097 GORDON (206)382-9540 • FACSIMILE(206)626-0675 ATTORNEYS AT LAW RECEIVED PETER L.BUCK BRENT CARSON OF COUNSEL JAY P.DERR ALISON D.BIRMINGHAM JOEL M.GORDON MADELEINE A.F.BRENNER SHELLEY E.KNEIP PROJECT MANAGER AMY L.KOSTERLITZ KEITH E.MOXON KATHRYN A.GARDOW,P.E. June 22, 1993 Mr. Don Erickson Zoning Administrator Development Services City of Renton 200. Mill Avenue South. Renton, WA` 9.8055. Re: Blackriver Corporate Parka Dear Don: As we unfortunately keep missing each other by phone, I thought I would send you a brief note explaining our requests. First, pursuant to an agreement with the City through meetings with Jay Covington, Kay Shoudy, Mary Lynn Meyer and Larry Warren, it was agreed that rather than amend the City's new CO zoning to include some uses formerly allowed in the OP zone, the City would issue an administrative interpretation of its CO zone that "warehousing, product servicing, wholesaling and storage are allowed if part of a permitted use." See the memo of Larry Warren to Jay, Kay and Mary Lynn dated May 3, 1993. My understanding is that the City has determined that you are the appropriate person to issue the administrative interpretation of the code. We are very anxious to get this interpretation issued. If you have any questions about it, please feel free to call me or, as I have said, the above-mentioned City folks are very familiar with what was intended for the administrative interpretation. The second.issue is that, while we understand that you have issued a general extension for all permits until the end of December of this year, First City Washington will probably need to go ahead and begin the process for getting a new shoreline permit approved for..Phase 6 of th&Blackriver Corporate Park, so that when the extension expires, it will have 4• Mr. Don Erickson - 2 - June 22, 1993 its new permit ready. Obviously, if you plan additional extensions, this would not be necessary. Please let us know your thoughts on this and how to obtain the new permit. Very truly yours, Amy L. s erlitz cc: Dean Erickson Jay Covington Kay Shoudy Mary Lynn Meyer Larry Warren FC17501 V..06213.ALK . I The people who had the water rights to build a dam across �� Colorado's Gunnison Gorge decided never to use them.They gaveillkeM'Q., the rights to The Nature Conservancy to preserve and Meet 'i d S�i�J 1-"I rd natural wonder. Y `� .U +,`"'T. -1 Do people sometimes care for nature by leaving it al..61713':, GIMS ih�1(v i, , .kA q r. f Deaf Aet nne 1,04- C`c' of +DIAL = 'y� i i g" .<-) MAY .. I �O,Qft_ , a l& , ,. ._. stiovit_ siro_hf_ ,wo ,:.4 4',,eti.,-DL. b-F - ,ors , i; p 1lid 1'veflAyci5 f1.44.A.. o c..yi Ur antes 61 Vel.) p/a5e, 1 pldoae-r /.it t'e- ylt A S .;- i I C°�"�"��"'j . � 5 �e� yn�n� a5 a, 1i� ; / , Dew It d a/60 dev-elo n Noo a it Ilvev , O TLIE IL :5 I :LISFI,JS--OLYMc i-I—ES/FwF TEL Hn:20 .-75.3—cioop 14F-p.,7-1 poi • • • L • ••.• • -`73. _ " 1? • PLANA %VG Crry 1V49041 "'VON 1141Y 3 n I990 fteCE IVE.r) • • • • • • -2 CONFTRX RECEIPT YTS 434-9440 COHMERCIAL 206/753-9440 • • e \\K' • • • .74.2 IUt i 4;D4 IL';Lrze 1..,TD-LIL rir-'1 H-Lt./ lAtI L NU Jb (7:0-1-PLIILlif 44btiu . . . • Uaited - :J..f..1-31.3.itl-tient of the Interior vriLDFIIE SERVICE • • r.1 lEcthanco.:man't • Bldg, )3 '38502 . . to • Drojct the feokery • in a c,vlping c;10tar climcsa to ha du -round 1crztructumm . H. fc:::ta at the ET-Ll sll known .--Ar!Acno ,,t11.1 react 26rC-.0 icular ..:j[Ti.lirbance to Eiorthwelgt her Each of LJ Trhkl I-116 lUt 14:n4 ILINJol-Wb-UL)TelH-Lb/FWL ILL INLI:ZUb-Yni-.JUULI • • • • - 0. !ferent from the proposed project, There • .••'• • that the rookery liear the propobed . /-,0 be iaucci2sAtu1. simply because other ' H - 0 a nignifiant ditturbance to officy bui1ding devolopatnt r-svento such as logging (an • • •:.') 1ote to within 400 feet humsn and . 12-4.4trode Lcio e_r!' by zAven ion n6zte. 'SD atory 1 • failure; 6et-backs -_"nli-2:5Qmont e,w kill blue herons and au adjacent j • :1,..31btirbance to v-,nay to WhiCh be heron az a regrult. set- these set- . . iut IL NU:cf:Ub—(03—.71UUt 4tc.7Ju rue4 • 1..).2!:ortunity •. !0 ! /61.ddc.ss yolA can• oll'fF -et plan, • • S - 1 Wooden platforms above power lines protect ?t¢raptors.They were designed and put there by a lot of eagles other //__ t people whose jobs brought them to this remote area , ((/ Q ���' ��� Do People really reach that high to protect a natural w.. r' G i E ��1 Y' IYZS, // *� �� a-. 9' U, , P`4,$ _, C °c` +t %. 1 P/e4-s2' MarrsM. . OF�j L��p�p / `• +T••,,_I - NMI. .„..,,.. crfro. liV I t � a-,e I . riez/v6- FurvAzetio- ,i --i -a:-..„:„.. _.,-,.,,,.:-„,.:_ 12 , , /2-E711W/11 t/E-120. e 1 8 COVE , , _Fitsvl � d-Lit1 /��� � sir f�a; f owl _Ca°Ar ,vim Dix- `�4ll�P '� �` comet of v�-laP G l/l t ��� 4e/U7" : 40 aito .,mamb. g..e, 6 fid6 cr. p_40-,,, cis, 5.mariy 5Ae 0,/„........_ • iiiit14,165 2-cis Q ,' v I A 9 . • - • ` ,IVISIC�r•� \\1 REQUEST TO WITHDRAW OR SUPPLEMENT • . BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK DEIS ATTENTION: City of Renton and members of the Environmental Review Committee We, the undersigned, respectfully request that the City of Renton immediately withdraw the draft environmental impact statement, issued April 11, 1990 , and reissue the document at such time that the document is completed in draft form. Alternatively, the City of, Renton may prepare a supplemental draft environmental impact statement. Document was released prematurely The document in question, the Blackriver Corporate Park DEIS, contains numerous errors in fact and omission. While the purpose of the DEIS comment period is to identify these errors of fact and omission, it is reasonably expected that the document would contain sufficient information that would allow the public to review the proposal and understand the most significant and vital information concerning the proposed action, alternatives, and impacts.. The document in its current form is incomplete and does not allow this . The errors in fact regarding this matter appear to be straightforward. However, when faced with the insurmountable burden placed on the public because of the preponderance of errors of omissions it becomes impossible by 'reading the DEIS to fully understand the facts relating to this proposal . At the public hearing on May 1, 1990 , preliminary comments were provided to the Environmental Review Committee. These preliminary comments clearly outlined omissions in the City' s environmental review. Those omissions include, but are not limited to the following: o Failure to include citations of references mentioned in the text; o Inclusion of references that were erroneously stated as references on particular subject matter that were in fact not related; o An incomplete overview of the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and Green River policy plan. There are extensive typographical errors . A more accurate description of the document is "preliminary draft" or "rough draft" EIS . The release of this document was premature. 1 - Burden on the public The public is recognized as having generally more limited resources . But the environmental review of this document is dependent on public participation, as is all review under SEPA. It is clear from the effort the public has undertaken so far and the testimony heard at the public hearing on May 1 , 1990 that the inadequacy of this document is to the extent that an unacceptable and unrealistic amount of effort and cost must b.e borne by the public to correct the document. The City of Renton is responsible for preparing the DEIS . When the document is as incomplete as this one, the City will rely on the public to complete it for them. This is an unacceptable burden on the public and shifting of responsibility by the City. Effect of incomplete document at this stage The inclusion of omitted information would allow an understanding of the proposal, alternatives, and impacts . An overwhelming number of corrections and additions to the document will next be published in a final environmental impact statement. The review and comment period for the public at the final EIS stage will be seven (7 ) days . In seven days the public will need to review and comment on an insurmountable assemblage of information that we should have been reviewing at the draft EIS stage. The existing document effectively removes the public from the review process at that stage. Comments Submitted Separately Although we strongly believe the DEIS should be withdrawn, as set forth above, we are submitting separate comments so that our comments will be part of the formal record. Those comments detail the inadequacies of the DEIS . For that reason, the errors and omissions referred to above are not repeated again in this letter. Conclusion The Blackriver Corporate Park DEIS is incomplete, inadequate, and has been released prematurely. Under these circumstances the burden on the public is beyond reasonableness . Elimination of the public from any portion of the environmental review process must be avoided so that we are all assured that our 2 protection provided under SEPA and the City of Renton environmental ordinance is available and realized. Submitted this �T-P-• day of May, 1990 . Seattle Audu on Society Citizens for Renton Robert G. Sieh Wildlands Preservation First Vice President Susan Krom, Director AGMTS\AUDU-2.590 3 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAY 2 9 1990 RE EWEI May 25, 1990 Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner Department of Community Development 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Black River Corporate Park Dear Ms. Myer, The King County Office of Open Space has reviewed the above- referenced document and our comments follow. The Black River Park Corporate Park Draft EIS lacks key analyses that should be incorporated into the Final EIS for that document to be considered adequate and complete. 1) One area seriously lacking in analysis is the alternative use of the site as a public park or protected open space. Potential uses of the site for a park could include many more activities beyond "bird watching and lunchtime relaxation" listed in Section 3 .9. 1 (Park and Other Recreational Facilities) to include environmental education and interpretation, linkage to hiking trails and other uses in keeping with the sensitive nature of the site. The analysis in Section 3 . 9. 1 notes briefly the names and rough directions from the site of several local parks, however, they should be noted on maps, with exact distances and uses of the parks indicated. It is not . possible to determine any effect of the proposed project on those parks or gain a sense of the geographic appropriateness of the site for a future park or nature preserve. Also, an indication of other sites Renton that currently or potentially could serve as nature preserves for controlled public access should be included in the FEIS. Without this analysis, it is impossible to determine the relative importance of the site as a local • ,-- III nature preserve, beyond its obvious importance as a heronry. 2) The degree of importance of the heronry within the context of King County is not explicit in the DEIS. Although other heronries within the county are listed, the FEIS should indicate the locations of all other known heronries in the County and should include information such as observed breeding activity, seasonal variations and total numbers of heron residents. The mere existence of the heronry on the site does make this site one of regional significance and therefore one on which strong protection measurements, beyond minimum standards should be undertaken. 3) Section 3 .9. 1 makes no mention of the fact that funds to acquire land directly adjacent to the proposed development site have been approved by the voters of King County under the 1989 Open Space Bond Act for protection of an environmentally significant area known as Black River 4'12 Forest. The proposed Black River Corporate Park could potentially have an adverse impact on the environmental health and aesthetic quality of Black River Forest, however, with no analysis of the effect of the proposed development on the Black River Forest it is impossible to determine what the impacts will be. 4) The DEIS lacks a serious analysis of wildlife and plant • life at the site. While much of the wildlife on the site 44 may be fairly common on a statewide or national scale, many of these species may be very rare within the city of .) Renton itself. Thus, this site may provide one of the few opportunities within the boundaries of the urbanized city of Renton for residents to observe wildlife and plant life in a setting that maintains a degree of wildness. A complete inventory of the diversity and abundance of flora and fauna at the site should be included in the FEIS. e 5) The FEIS should also include specific information in an appendix concerning the exact feeding locations and flight patterns of the herons nesting at the site. The two Heron -? flight zones seem to pass conveniently around the proposed building sites. Are these two zones averages of total numbers of flights? How much variance to these two zones exists? have any herons been observed flying directly through of overhead of the exact proposed building locations? The impact of the building plan, as currently proposed, should be analyzed after the above-requested information has been gained. The presently proposed mitigation measures do not incorporate this information and therefore should not be considered as currently adequate. Only mitigation measures that take into account information gained through this I further study should be taken into consideration so that the City of Renton may adequately protect the flora and fauna of the site, including the Heronry, as well as make a better determination of the appropriateness of the site as a nature preserve park with controlled public access. Sincerely, 1 David Tiemann Open Space Planner King County Office of Open Space i boo N4 c4reS • ,, /?einm L.i4- g s;by cratching its nest in;the sand i):av Great es' -- �''�" —z... beaches,the piping plover is g thred in 4 e ion b PP g �4 development,beach recreation,an; man di3turban nce soy �S numerous it was harvested for foots-Fewer then 20_pairs the - p•., sparrow-sized shorebirds survive o 1 the Cat attaVs.T .Nature -4.1,1 J11l( e Conservancy and the Michigan Dep-t men f total sources am s now working to preserve the dwindlin•-;.�f "piper"nests I �+'Ai— , at Wilderness State Park. �� Iltili9iitw�; p .t, 54,U� i'e tter MAY 2 19 __ oole � uu EEC ' ' use lsu, /- ay/GnneMer, 4 grte/LaA/ ..11:4-C, . ,ptcleiz5 14'r Fwest- TrN Sette, .e41.keice4 - C Nature Conservancy S ar�r� 1815 North Lynn Street,Arlington,VA 22209•(703)841-530 - very`�& Founded in 1951,The Nature Conservancy is an international n icSf pro '�/n / ,Q conservation organization that owns and manages more than 1,000 D D f'v` ��[ V �/�� nature preserves—the largest private preserve system in the world. Introductory member dues are$15 per year and include a subscription 's to The Nature Conservancy Magazine. PCP213 (//eocer PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAY 2 5 1990 Mary Lynne Myer Community Development RECEIVE® 200Mills Ave S. Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mrs . Myer; - I am writing to comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) prepared for the Blackriver Corporate Park Office Buildings. I believe that thedocument has a number of substantial problems . These problems range from a slanted presentation of factual information to a lack of specificity that makes it senseless to attempt to evaluate the project. I will point out the major flaws that I have been able to find in the document at this time . If there are any more I will write to you to point those out also. ' APPENDIX B Almost all. the. information in Appendix B - omits, or is missing valuable information needed to determine the impacts of human activity on Great Blue Heron Rookeries . There are eight Rookeries listed in table B-1 page B-3 . The table of "rookery status" all eight of the rookeries are listed as viable, and yet under the table "approximate # of Nests" the list states unknown. If the number of nests are unknown at a Rookery then the status of that Rookery is unknown since the number of nest could range from 0 to an infinite number . In fact the last listed number of Known nests for the Pigeon • Point Rookery was 0 in 1988 . The document does an insufficient job of describing the particular settings for each of the rookeries . In the instance of Peasley Canyon the make shift parking lot sets almost 500 feet from the nesting sites, but is also almost 300 feet below the nesting sites . The nests are on the top near the top and edges of the Canyon while the parking lot sits on the valley floor. Almost all established Rookeries that have tolerated close human activity have only allowed for traffic or mechanical intrusions. Birds in general are tolerant of cars, and yet become intolerant if the people start stepping out of the cars . The fact is that automobiles move in consistent patterns in set areas, humans do not. Although it can be shown that Rookeries will tolerate traffic, it cannot be shown that they will tolerate human movement within close proximity. Two of the three rookeries on the list that have human housing near them have an unknown status. (Pigeon Point, and Spencer •Property) li • • • • • • .: - _ • • I have been to all the rookeries on the list in Washington. The descriptions of the activity and the surrounding environment contained in the document portray a poor picture of how the sites exist. To describe the proximity in numbers of feet, only a sketchy detail of the tree and foliage coverage, and no accounting of the ' topography does not accurately reflect the conditions at those rookeries. FLIGHT PATH Another glaring generalization in the document is the so called "flight path" of the herons . This supposed path is detailed within some of the maps in the DEIS . I have been to the Rookery, and live near the Rookery. The herons . do not limit themselves to the narrow confines of this supposed flight path. The size of the colony is growing each year . In the first few years the main food source for the herons was at the mouth of the Cedar River . At times almost a dozen herons can be seen crossing the airport at dusk heading toward the Black River Rookery to roost . As the colony has grown the movements and forays for food now take the birds into the Green River Valley. Some of the birds from the. Black River Rookery feed as far south as the Kent' Lagoons, .and I am sure some even further . I have watched the migration of the birds in and out of the Valley each morning and night . The birds do not limit themselves to a set North Eastern Flight Path as the DEIS indicates . The birds now are going out in all directions as the competition for food becomes more intense. There is no set flight path in and out. of the Rookery, and the assertion that there is makes the document very misleading. WILDLIFE The DEIS makes only generalizations about the existing wildlife on the proposed constructions sites.. On 3-33 the document examines "wildlife most likely to utilize the site" . It also speaks to animals that "may" nest or feed along the. edges of the P-1 pond. This typeof language would seem to indicate that the drafters did not take the time to examine what wildlife is on the site. These general terms only state what would "likely" be on the site or "may" be on the site, and do not account for what is on the site. I could briefly give you a list of the wildlife that is on the site . Red Tailed Hawks, Each of the Accipters Coopers, Sharp Shined, and Goshawk, Merlins, and on one occasion a wintering Peales Peregrine . Bald Eagle, and Osprey have both been seen perching in the trees above the P-i Pond . Great Horned, Screech, Barn, Short Eared, and Saw Whet Owls have all been seen on the site during nesting season. I1 . 1,1 II I. r I. : . 1, • it I hl • 1 I I You must insist that a field study be done to determine exactly what is on the site so that the impacts to those species may be mitigated. CONCLUSION The DEIS must be updated or redone so that the information necessary for making a decision on this project can be fully examined. Other options must be presented . Those options must include some plan that would eliminate any buildings on either site that would be taller than the trees containing the Rookery. SSi g e d Christopher . 1. or 2721 Talbot Rd. S . Renton, WA 98055 ( 206 ) 255-6495 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTO ) MAC 2 5 1990 i1MdBECEWED 14i,13064 .03" eizkaat2 - -iLLgaUDDNs- A-0 __ a e01- _ I' luta_ ck(gp ,...Ao+ __„ - - A C ow , Aftpd3A - -11.91L_x0-66 4-oo__4.e.422)--___a -61Q- a-JO- t2-_1-7Za fix 1 Q')&4t2i-AeLe61,uaLtsiiag_ _ ,,PzXti+a+_ epHm&__0.a . cL\m_c4Q_ _ - a - -< 9-13- - Aik i0 C• Andrew Carpenter 939 24th Ave S. Seattle, Washington 98144 Mary Lynne Meyer PLANNING DIVISION Senior Environmental Planner CITY OF RENTON Dept. of Community Development MAY 2 5 1990 200 Mill Ave S. Renton, Wa. RECEIVED 98055 I am writing to you after reviewing the DEIS for the proposed Black River Corporate Park. I strongly support the No Action alternatives for both tracts A and B. I feel-that--the- DEIS is inadequate, incomplete, and lacking in justification for adversely affecting the valuable Black River Riparian .Forest and Heron Rookery, on which the office park is to be developed. The DEIS states that a need for the corporate park has been identified (2-4), but within the DEIS there is no detailed analysis of this need. Given the value of the Black River Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery, and the priority for its preservation, the demand for office space would need to be overwhelming and without alternatives to justify adversely affecting the area. What research has been performed in identifying this need? What are the detailed results of this analysis? A 1981 wetlands study cited in the 1986 City of Renton Comprehensive Plan claimed the Black River Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery to be the most valuable wetland in Renton. (p. 42). Obviously, developing alternative sites, in which more resilient or less valuable habitats would be disturbed by development, is preferable to development in the proposed area. If other sites have not been considered, they should be. If there are possible alternative sites for the Black River Corporate Park, where are they? The volume of traffic -in the area proximal to the proposed corporate park is already beyond capacity; it is daily characterized by slow-moving-to- standstill traffic jams. What will be the impact of adding 2100 automobiles to the morning and afternoon rush hours on Interstate 405.? The case studies of the tolerance of heron rookeries to human disturbances in appendix B are incomplete. The case studies of heron rookeries surviving close to human developments do not make note of the vitality of those rookeries. The number of nests in a particular rookery are not necessarily indicative of the reproductive success of _ that rookery. Have any of these case studies included a more detailed analysis of the vitality of the heron rookeries? Please include any such information in the final EIS. Additionally, appendix B includes no examples of herons being adversely affected by proximal development. If any such studies exist they should be included in appendix B to insure an unbiased conclusion. What are the thresholds at which herons will abandon an established rookery? Determination of the age of the Black River heron rookery is critical in assessing the tolerance of this particular rookery to human disturbance. The "sketchy" historical accounts of nesting herons prior to the construction of the P-1 Pond (reported three years after the pond's construction) (B-2) should be further clarifed. How many nests existed? Were the existing nests, without a doubt, blue heron nests? For the heron rookery to thrive, not only the nests, but the ecosystem in which they live, must be preserved. The water in Springbrook Creek and P-1 Pond is already "quite turbid" and polluted (3-23) and, with development this will get worse. Turbidity of the P-1 Pond and Springbrook Creek will be increased during construction, and pollutants associated with runoff will increase when the development is completed (3-23,3-27). Surrounded by this polluted water supply, will the diet of these particular herons be more dependent on mice, amphibians, reptiles, and vegetative matter than the diet suggested (for the average heron) in the ecologic overview (B-5)? If the polluted water does cause the herons to adjust their diets to a greater dependence on terrestrial resources, there will be no consolation for the herons when the tracts are cleared, graded, and when 75% of the land is converted to impervious surfaces. Is there any proposed mitigation for the proposed devastation of the blue herons' food web? The Black River Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery cannot support a development the size of the Black River Corporate Park while retaining the existing ecosystem of the great blue herons. Of the alternatives offered in the DEIS, I strongly support No Action. Additionally, I support the purchase of this important area, by the City of Renton, as a preserve. - PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON ON MAY 2 5 1990 RECEIVED d9.,u,_ W_ kip. eilo -k_tibeiuod- eecitzeriv r /e �� l �t �e �om a.�� ,�_�C_l t� �v_� ego t',t)4 CZyect., Nvat1 44. •6'S a.nx oire. - 5#D_44o_12-69maiii_ ,./442,L oie-Les eugg_..1.4esfrotamah 4ko.deAtwthe... Pod .46) 146, _66_605_ite_v_eej - - i Wit. owes Voo 04cA0e1®pe 4.c�d bu r' aoues . P�r�ki %6.6OAUej -462' .db oLes_er*d . b• . Be-Clore. c�.r�y cie s l oru 'es.haa.C+.rt.�ed_, car e. owe u ki V_s* &.& _ - ,,mac-devele4am 42Aa jecLCd® -A J d K_ 0.1- cvud " ru&edi&'i6 au '°� %0v1 _ -tiS _JA)±-t-k- ,kelud ilbtopt. 6-PA -ree,lity4 cods rai-jd atqa-0/0 am - Qs .i AC 0,-jj\- ireire.,_/uas Az tiit,yeA -d ,. -40-4Le01; e- ,iatkelic ar& Keit/4 d _ Ad/_wisto -1-0Lvta.444e ,i6/ 1.44,2tosecta „ coa_joiaithAct 0.4 a4c_ 444r°401.41/L - - - ems - dim4,6a • • • • I• I, . i, . .. . . o • H , . . . 1 . *. i' "- wcu-eraz &PT_ —c-:tryre •- ,c 'r-t9 cry ' .- soc) _' Nro-tpgrmr-incfn.-- *i\KNirc) *ntercrT6 p' -r0Fcks;)- 34% pro irryncAr 9-04nNierc- -Nu .vb Trcyrzi, -ism\%; Xiz-c nvrtra ''xteneerr op.--h4;4 Wrxrro c4Ter 6)0,, - .4 C2fieerIVW 76?T7*?cl (J19-);11;) ‘W71\- \;%4 _ czA4r-Q-0-Fsn -V �, �-gin - co . II . !n . ,f ,;I • • II • - r 1I . I 1 11 Ii I it 1 j p II I it 1h it I. 1 ail ,�I ( , ftinn /• i i a �y1 1889�pY STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000 May 25, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAY .3 0 1990 Ms. Mary Lynn Myer City of Renton RECEIVED 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Ms. Myer: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) for the Black River Corporate Park by First City Developments. We reviewed the DEIS and have the following comments. In general, the DEIS does not appear to address the entire area of the proposed development. Development in the vicinity of the P-1 wetlands and the heron rookery must be addressed in its totality before impacts can be adequately evaluated. We noted this in our previous comments and we are concerned that the cumulative impacts may not receive adequate consideration. WETLAND IMPACTS Buildings B and C in Alternative Al and the parking garage in Alternative B2 are proposed within the 600 foot buffer zone. We understand the buffer zone was required by the Hearing Examiner in a 1987 decision. Has that buffer zone condition been removed or changed, and if so, by whom? How wide will the buffer be for Tract A and will it be planted with native vegetation? We recommend a native vegetation buffer at least 100 feet wide for Tracts A and B. Small depressions referred to in the description of Tract A could be wetlands. Compensatory mitigation is recommended for any unavoidable impacts to these wetlands. It appears there is a proposed pipeline through Tract B wetlands. We strongly recommend an alternate route that avoids wetland impacts. Unavoidable impacts to wetlands should be mitigated for. The wetland in tract B should have at least a 50 foot wide buffer around it. Letter to Mary Lynn Myer May 25, 1990 Page 2 We recommend a detailed pre and post-development monitoring program involving vegetation, water quality and quantity, and wildlife for the P-1 wetland and any other satellite wetlands. A contingency plan should be developed to address potential future problems (e.g. marsh loss from a significant increase in hydrologic inputs or contamination from storm water pollutants) . The developer should be held accountable for the expense of the contingency plan implementation. CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS It has come to the attention of the Department of Ecology that possible contaminated dredge spoils are on-site. These ' spoils are from the dredging of the Black River Impoundment (aka P-i Pond) . This "pond" forms behind a dam and a majority of the sediment carried in Springbrook/Mill Creek are deposited in that impoundment. In 1984 the U. S. Soil Conservation Service dredged the existing P-1 pump forebay as part of a forebay expansion project. A water dredge was utilized and the discharge lagoon for the dredge operation was located at the site of the proposed construction. (Mary Anderson, personal communication, 27 April 1990) . Sediments in Springbrook/Mill Creek are known to exhibit high levels of contamination, exceeding Hazardous Waste Inspection and Cleanup Draft Cleanup Program (HWICP) Standards and, in some instances, dangerous waste criteria. A: list of known contaminated sites which have historically discharged into Springbrook/Mill Creek is attached. Due to the known historical contamination at the proposed site, it is being considered a potential contaminated site by the HWICP at Ecology's Northwest Regional Office. In addition to the usual impacts from project construction, other impacts are likely to result from the investigation and clean up of any contamination on-site such as well drilling, core sampling, excavation, backfill, etc. („L„..„, ,,,.._5.,„„................„..,, 25 ri, kc NicabsU.K.. <,,, M e ? 11 � 1 • 6,„„,,,,vi...s &.....i.z. apce-el-rirk , ,,,,--...-L---2:L, ' e, A+ ,JI V't5st \14 ) Pre-tee' W.' PeAu-Ircs)L3 0) HJ( ..To� > W� o 5C 0 • I ' Letter to Mary Lynn Myer May 25, 1990 Page 3 In view of the potential for significant adverse impacts to wetlands and wildlife habitat, and the potential risks from contaminated sediments, we will continue to look closely at this proposal. The City of Renton should seriously consider whether the proposed intensity of development is appropriate for the site. If you have any questions on wetland issues, please call Ms. Terra Prodan or Mr. John Marshal of our Shorelands Program at (206) 459-6835. For questions on contaminated sediments, please call Mr. Norm Peck of our Hazardous Waste Cleanup Program at (206) 867-7047. Sincerely, Donald J. Bales Environmental Review Section DJB: enclosures (7) cc: Norm Peck, NWRO Rachel Bennett, NWRO Terra Prodan, BH John Marshal, BH ' • ( ) ECOLOSY - NWRO • ) ardour Waste Investigation & Cleanup Frog' • .+ April 6, 19?0 SITE ' . HWCP ID EPA NO CATS SITE NAME ALIAS NAME' LOCATION ADDRESS CLOSEST CITY ZIP STAFF OTHER N-11'0040-000 D980974489 C2 6th Avenue South Landfill 2901 6th Ave S. Seattle 98134 DC N-1770041-000 D097815617 N A J Zinda Company 37405 Pacific Hwy S Federal Way 98003 N-1770042-000 D069585495 C2 ABC Metal Finishing Inc. 528 Pontius N Seattle 98109 N-17=0043-000 D009286881 C2 Ace Galvanizing Inc 429 S 96th Seattle '. 98108 LD DC _ N-37-0001-000 D980514426 Acme Landfill Mosquito Lake Rd Acme 98220 N-174044-000 D980726442 C2 Acme Plating Works 601 N 35th Seattle 98103 N-37;0039-900 Cl Acme/LUSTs ,Acme Acme 98220 CW,NP N-17=0045-000 D009278847 Cl Advance Electroplating Advance Co.''s I 9585 8th Ave S Seattle 98101 LD DC ' N-17-0047-000 D097818983 C2 Airco Welding Prod 7700 14th Av S Seattle 98108 LD DC N-17-5013-000 C2 Alaska Copper & Brass Alaskan Copper 3200 Sixth Ave. S. Seattle 98134 CW,DL . N-17-0031-000 Cl Alaska Pacific Fisheries 2360 W. Commodore Way Seattle 98199 DC,LD N-17=0048-000 D063351506 C2 American Can Company 400 Baker Blvd Seattle 98188 N-17-0049-000 D009261397 C1 American Tar Co ATCO 1700 N Northlake Way Seattle 98103 LD • pN=17-5016-000 - ' ' ' C2 ' AM-Tec, Inc'. :'I',; , ;� :, . - -0;;:<,19025 84th'Ave::1:71 >?i-Kenn:1?;Y;', (;,rni 98032AC,;NPli N-17-0051-000 D042476788 C2 And-All Electrochrome Inc 6332 6th S Seattle 98108 N-170006-011 CI ARCO - Tank Farm Atlantic Richfi 1652 SW Lander St.. Seattle '98134 MT,OC N-17-0052-000 D094622339 N Argent Chem Laboratories 14929 NE 40 St Redmond 98007 ' N-31-0008-000 D061677647 N Arlington Ford Hwy 9 & Highlands Dr Arlington 98223 CB N-31-0009-000 D980976013 C2 Arlington/Marysville Ldfl Arlington Airport Arlington 98223 N-17-0006-100 D980493670 ' C2 Asahipen America, Inc. Seattle Paint P 1128 SW Spokane St Seattle 98134 DC ' N-17L0116-000 D009249616 C2 Ash 6rove Cement West, In Lone Star Indus 3801 E Marginal WayS • Seattle • 96134 DC N-17-0053-000 D057311177 N Ashland Chemical Co • 831 Fifth Av S Kent 98031 N-17-0054-000 ➢041920554 C2 Asko Processing Inc 434 N 35th Seattle 98103 LD ➢M N-17-0021-001 N Atlas Demolition Future Resource 1015 3rd Seattle 98104 LD N-17-5020-000 Cl Auburn Abandoned Fire Sta ' 700 Auburn Way S. Auburn 98002 GC,NP N-170021-002 N Austin Mack 2739 Sixth Ave S Seattle 98134 DC LD . N-17=0055-000 D980722250 C2 Bahnmiller Autobody Shop 3734 A St SW Auburn 98002 • N-18-0009-000 D980978720 Cl Bainbridge Isl. LF- Trenc End of Vincent Rd • Bainbridge 98110 D6,SS NB N-17-0056-000 D044606945 C2 Pallestrasse Logging 28015 SE 432nd St Enumclaw 98022 N-17-0164-000 D980723084 C2 Bayside Disposal Co. • Sunset Disposal 7201 W Marginal Way S Seattle 98106 ' N-170058-000, 0078194107 C2 Bellevue Plating Co Inc Plating Co Inc. 1513 128th PL NE Bellevue 98005 N-37L5002-000 C2 Bellingham National Bank ' 863 N. State St. Bellingham 98227 NP N-37=0014-000 D980511703 C2 Bellingham-Old City Dump Old City Dump Roeder Av Bellingham 98225 DS N-17-5030-000 Cl Bird Johnson Company 1608 Fairview Ave. E. • Seattle, WA 98102 DM DC • N-31-0010-000 D076635358 C2 uiringer Berry Farm 6219 88th St. NE Marysville 98270 . N-17-0060-000 D9B0975791 C2 Black Nugget Mine-NE/Cree Black Nugget Road Issaquah 98027 N-17=0061-000 D980975734 C2 Black Nugget Mine-Rock Tu Black Nugget Road Issaquah 98027 N-17=0062-000 0980975676 C2 Black Nugget Mine-SW/Cree Black Nugget Road Issaquah 98027 N-17-0070-000 D980933669 Cl BNR- Roundhouse Site Roundhouse Site Tracks Parallel to MS Skykomish 98288 DS KB N-31-0011-000 D041585464 C2 Boeing Carcl. Airpin,- Ev 3003 W. Casino Rd • Everett 98203 LC N-17-0002-000 D041337130 C2 Boeing Co- Auburn 700 15th Street SW Auburn 98002 LC N-170205-000 Cl Boeing Co- Isaacson/Thomp Isaacson Steel 8541 E Marginal Way S Seattle . 98106 LC JS,JC ,N-17-0064 �00 D000711622 N• BoeingCo- Kent Benarg a"'t'.:4' l:20651 84 4;,,; S' _.`;1.1 t, < _r Y 'St ��1� , Kent,,��,LS�I�f...;.�}s,'l;',,.96034..�}ifs; /N-17-0065-000 D061670766'• 'C2 Boeing Co- 'Kent Space Cen'' 3':':. .;ff 20403:68thAve'S"E:' ',IWICenti?'AMKR4R98032 LCI3 N-17-0021-003 D980976260 Cl Boeing Co- North Field Ellis Ave. & E. Marginal Seattle 98108 LC DC N-170021-010 Cl loeing Co- North Fld.JP4 Ellis Ave. & E. Marginal Seattle 98108 LC N-1710066-000 D009256819 N Boeing Co- Plant 2 7755 E Marginal Wy S• Seattle 98124 DC LC N-17-0063-000 D009262171 Cl Boeing Co- Renton Eighth and Logan ' Renton 98055 LC,NP N-31-0012-000 D980185789 C2 Boeing Co- Tulalip Test S 11224 34th NE Marysville 98270 LC , N-17-0067-000 D093639946 L Boeing Developmental Cent 9725 E Marginal Wy S Seattle 98124 LC NP bN417=0068=000 D0525815b8' '-'N'' Borden Chemical Company m Nf-T;.{' + . '(421;1st Ave'N'"'iM'+" R^;;t+:Kent' +; Tp tx? ;98031'fl#yxrm'E=,q N-37-0015-000 D980835565 N Boulevard Park N End• Bayview Drive Bellingham' 98226 • N-17-0069-000 D980639231 C2 Bow Lake Landfill S 188th St & Military Rd Tukwila 98188 / \ \ \, ECOLOGY - NWRO �,1 . • :ardour Waste Investigation & Cleanup Prag . SM1S Alphabetical Listing April 6, 1990 • • SITE . . • . HWCP ID ' EPA NO CAT6 SITE NAME ' ' ALIAS NAME LOCATION ADDRESS CLOSEST CITY ZIP 'STAFF OTHER N-17L0198-000 L Bronson Way Texaco 1408 Bronson Way ' • Renton 98055 LC,RK N-31-0013-000 D980639942 C2 Bryant Landfill 6306 Grandview Rd Arlington 98223 6C • N-17I-0022-000 L Burien/SW Suburban Sewer 10th Ave. SW & SW 154th Seattle 98166 NP ' N-29-0011-000 D980664551 Cl Butler Hill Lagoon Septic Tank Lag N of Kelleher Rd by Old H Burlington 98233 6C,DN :aN=i7 0071=000 D076655182 'C2 ' Cabot Ind.; 4, i 'iti.t' HeathrPlatingfif,P8202:St,,200th'StT, r,?ITIF:KentN 1M§t98O31r w N-37L0017-000 D980722441 N Campbell Residence 831 E Axton Rd Bellingham 98226�J6 N-31-0001-000 D980638993 N Cathcart Landfill 14528 Hwy 9 Snohomish .98290.OW N-17-0003-000 D980639991 CI Cedar Falls Landfill • 16901 Cedar Falls Rd SE North Bend 98045 CB N-171E0004-000 D047848122 CI Cedar Hills Landfill 16645 228 Ave SE Issaquah 98038 DS,GC N-37E0002-000 D980665517 C2 Cedarville' Landfill Cedarville Road' Bellingham 98226 CW DM N-11-0167-000 L Central Painting 4749 W. Marginal Way SW Seattle 98106 DC N-17r0184-000 D046499778 Cl Champion Intnatl- Ballard Ballard Mill Si 4025 13th Ave. West Seattle 98107 DS,LD ' N-17-0072-000 D028035137 N Chem Securities Systems 10602 NE 38th P1 Kirkland 98033 /N 17-UU73-U00 D000111689 C1 Cheecentral•Solvents, Co .„ eta=: F;1;, 7bOL:S:14.Oth:St� x a»;nq�:Kentr pyd� ,.i98032,13y N-17r0074-000 D000812909 C2 Chemical Processors Inc 734 S Lucile St Seattle • 98108 N-17r0075-000 D000831735 N Chemical Processors Inc 7500 Detroit Ave SW Seattle . 98108 N-17-0076-000 D000812917 C2 Chemical Processors Inc Pier 91 Seattle 98119 DC N-31I0014-000 D000064568 N Chevron USA Inc-Asphalt 20555 Richmond Beach Richmond Bch 98177 • N-17-0077-000 D053818340 C2 Chromium Inc ' �' 1005 S King . Seattle ' 98104 N-31-0062-000 D082506767 N Circuits Engineering 1802 180th SE Bothell 98011 JS N-17I0078-000 D980975619 C2 Coal Creek Mine- Old Work 166th Way SE, Sect. 36 , Issaquah 98027 ' N-374018-000 D065981904 N Columbia Cement • Marine Dr ' ' • Bellingham 98225 N-18�0011-000 D980639835 C2 Constitution Ave. Landfil Constitution Ave & Porter Bremerton 98310 N-187 5000-000 c.I Country Junction Store OW SE 6001.0 Port Orch&rd. 193bb JH N-15-0003-000 D980640015 N Coupeville Landfill Hwy 20 Oak Harbor 98277 N-17I0079-000 D027460898 N Crosby & Overton Inc 3406 13th SW Seattle ' ' 98134 DC N-37-00019-000 D058349606 N Crosby & Overton Inc 2032 Humboldt ' Bellingham 98225 N-17�0080-000 D990977391 N Crossroads Mall Dry Clean NE 8th & 156th Ave. . ' Bellevue 98005 N-17I0081-000 D061602498 N Crowley Environmental Ser • 3400 E Marginal 'Wy S . Seattle 98134 DC • N-15-0004-000 D980639058 C2 Cultus Bay Landfill • Cultus Bay Rd. Whidbey Island 98277 N-17-0143-000 Cl Custom Circuit Technology 11807 NE 116th . Kirkland. ' 98033 NP N-.1745025-000 CI D & L Ventures Property 5339 Roosevelt Way NE Seattle, WA 98125 NP,DD • N-1715017-000 Cl Davis Construction Co., I 24515 26th P1. S. , Seattle 98198 6C N-18-5001-000 Cl Day Road Industrial Park • • Day Road W. & Hwy 305 Bainbridge Isla 98110 GC,DM N-17-0084-000 D079247474 N Dimensional Engineering 9407 E Marginal Wy • Seattle , 98108 N-31-5009-000 C2 Diversified Industrial Se 7627 Upper Ridge Road Everett', Wa ' 98203 NP N-17-0085-000 D980639876 ' C2 Duvall Landfill . - 22905 Old Wood/Duval • • Duvall ' 98019 N-17I0026-000 Cl Duwamish Fill Site- DOT DOT Landfill S. 124th St. & S.R. 99 . Seattle 98168 MT,DC N-17-0086-000 D980975304 C2 Duwamish River-Boeing Plt 7700 E Marginal Way • Seattle ' ' 98124 DC LC ' N-17-0035-000 Cl Duwamish Shipyard, Inc. 5658 W Marginal Way SW Seattle 98106 DC RK N-17T0001-000 D980639132 C2 Eastgate Abandoned Landfi Bellevue Airpor 2805 160th Ave SE Bellevue 98008 LC N-1745027-000 Cl Electrofinishing Company 510 'A' St. S.E. Auburn WA 98002 NP N-17-0087-000 D980639777 C2 Enumclaw Landfill • 29000 SE 440 St Enumclaw 98022 N-31-0015-000 D980639405 C2 Everett City Landfill 2902 36th St SE Everett 98201 -- N-3140003-000 Cl Everett Tire Fire . . 3002 Wetmore Everett . 98201 DC,JW N-37-0004-000 D980722326 C2 Everson Goshen Dspl T39N, R3E, Sec 24 Bellingham 98247 CW ' N-17I0088-000 D980178883 C2 Factoria Pit (Sunset Park '132 Ave SE & SE 38th Bellevue 98006 • N-17-0089-000 D980511737 C2 Federal Way Landfill • .. S 352 & I-5 Puyallup Auburn 98002 N-3745003-000 Cl Ferndale 7-Eleven 120938' 2090 Main St. N. Ferndale ' 98248 NP,CB N-17I0090-000 D027429141 N •Fiberlay Inc 1158 Fairview Ave N Seattle 98109 N-1740190-000 D980975197 Cl First Ave Bridge.Landfill DOT Landfill 7700 block of 2nd,Ave SW Seattle 98108 DC LD, K N-17-5026-000 Cl Floral Crest Nursery 7432 S. 131st Ave.' Seattle, WA 98178 NP ' N-17-5021-000 Cl Floyd R. Hunt, Inc. 3219 S. 259th P1. Kent. 98032 NP,DD ' 7 ' ,, • .. ( (_; � ECOLOGY - NWRO ' J ; •\� ;ardour Waste Investigation &.Cleanup Progr:_ SMIS Alphabetical Listing April 6, 1990 SITE HWCP;ID EPA NO CATS SITE NAME ALIAS NAME LOCATION ADDRESS CLOSEST CITY ZIP STAFF OTHER I N-174092-000 D980723603 C2 Four Tek Industries 228 Av SE; N of Cedar 6ro Issaquah ' 98027 N-374016-000 D009249475 N Frank Brooks Manufacturin Iowa & Orleans St Bellingham 98225 J6, ' N-15T0005-000 D980639959 C2 Freeland Landfill • Hwy 525 • Freeland 98277 N-17-0005-000 D980639280 Cl Gas Works Park(Wa Ntl Gas Washington Natu 2000 N. Northlake Way 'Seattle ' 98103 LC,LD ' • N-2970001-000 D009270612 N General Chemical Corporat Allied Chemical 655 N Texas Rd • Morristown • 98221 KF . ' N-17�0093-000 D043023449 C2 General Disposal Corp 1415 NW Ballard Way Seattle 98107 N-17T0094-000 D980639702 C2' Genesee Landfill • Genesee St & 43rd Ave. So Seattle 96118 N-31i0016-000 D980836092 Cl Go East Corp. Landfill Si Rekoway Landfil 108th St. SE & 39th St. Everett 98201 N-171006-101 D085197945 ' Cl Golden Penn Oil Company Western Pacific 2937 13th Ave. SW Seattle 98134 DC ' N-17;0096-000 D012425385 C2 Guardsman Products, Inc. Guardsman Chemi 13535 Monster Rd S Seattle 98178 N-17-0097-000 D980639165 N H & H Oleson Landfill NE 152nd P1 NE & SE 155th Woodinville •� 98072 • N-17-0098-000 D980639967 C2 Haller Lake Landfill • N 125 St E of Aurora Seattle 98133 N-18-0012-000 D000711804 Cl Hansville Landfill 31645 Hansville Rd, NE Little Boston 98366 . N-17-0099-000 D980639124 Cl Harbor Ave Landfill West Seattle LF Harbor Ave SW & SW Florid Seattle 98124 DC N-15'0006-000 0980639116 C2 Hastie Lake Landfill Hastie Lake Rd-3 mi sw/cy Oak Harbor 98277 JG N-171007-000 D980639595 L Hobart Landfill 23421 276th Ave. SE : Issaquah 98027 GC,A6 . N-17-0101-000 D010215184 M Honeywell Inc 5305 Shilshole Av.NW Seattle 98107 LD N-17-0102-000 D980639298 Cl Houghton Landfill NW of NE 60th & 120 Av NE Kirkland . . 98033 • N-17-5003-000 Cl H.F. Construction/Arrow T Richmond Beach 19249 15th Ave. -'NW Richmond Beach 98177 6C N-17-0103-000 D980639546 N Ideal Basic Industries Edge of Town Grotto 98288. N-174104-000 D041580176 N Ideal Basic Ind-Cement P1 5400 W Marginal May Seattle -98106 N-2910015-000 Cl Impact Industries-Sulphur 1325 Hwy 237 Mt. Vernon • 98273 NP,JG N-17-0006-027 Cl Industrial Office Complex 2955 llth Ave SW . Seattle 98134 DC LD N-17,0105-000 D009491200 C2 Industrial Plating Corp 2411 6th S Seattle 98134 DC N-17 0106-000 D007942733 C2 Inland Transportation Co 6737 Corson S Seattle 98108 N-17r0107-000 D980974729 C2 Interbay Old Landfill - • W Wheeler St & 15th Ave W Seattle 98119 N-151007-000 D048669840 N Island Disposal Inc. Disposal Inc. 525 Hwy 20 Coupeville 98239 ' N-171030-000 D009265521 Cl J H Baxter & Company Inc 5015 Lake Washington•Blvd Renton 98055 GC,SS N-31;0017-000 D053823019 C2 .1 H Baxter & Company- Arl 6520 188th St. NE ' Arlington 98223 SC • ' N-17i0108-000 D980664585 N J J Jackson Septic Tank S 15671 SE139 P1 Renton 98055 N-17-0109-000 D009260076 . C2 Jarvie Paint Mfg Co • 760 Aloha St Seattle 98109 ' N-37I0026-000 D98022508 C2 Kenmar Company Inc 6065 Kickerville Rd Ferndale 98248 N-17-0111-000 D980639611 C2 Kenmore Landfill 68 Av NE, so. of NE Bathe Kenmore . 98155 A=171-50►19-000 ` C1' Kent Sewage'Lagoons ', ;�'J .: '':$�,;+TSW afr'S 212 St.&•68th.;Avi%Ken ;t ..;FFT,•98032y.NP� u,'J;�.;C;1 yL N-17r0037-000 D009249509 Cl Kenworth Truck Company . 8801 E Marginal Way S Seattle 98108 DC N-17-0112-000 D980976229 C2 King 4 Coal Co Mine, A SE Newcastle-Coal Ck Newcastle 98006 N=17L0021-006 N King Co Airport- Maintenan 6518 Ellis Av S Seattle 98108 DC,RK N-30004-000 D041332552 Cl King Fiberglass • Arlington Airpo 19105 63rd Ave. NE Arlington • 98223 NP . _-. N-31i001B-000 D980639017 C2 Lake Goodwin Landfill I, . 18520 Frank Waters R Stanwood • 98292 6C N-17I5015-000 Cl Lake Hills STP- former W Lk Sammamish Pkwy/S of Bellevue 98052 LD N-31;0019-000 D980833883 N Lake Roesiger Landfill 19619 Dubuque Rd Snohomish 9.8290 ' N-31�0004-000 D980511612 L Lake Stevens Landfill . . . 131st Ave. NE Everett . 98258 SC DN ' N-17I0193-000 Cl Lake Union Drydock.' - 1315 Fairview Ave. East Seattle . ' 98102.LD,DC N-17-0197-000 Cl Lake Washington School Di 8749 122nd Ave NE • Kirkland 98033 GC N-17-0113-000 D980976161 C2 Landsburg Mine-Rogers Sea . Kent-Kangley Rd & 268th A Black Diamond 98010 DS,NP N-17701.14-000 D003893559 N Lee & Eastes Tank Lines • 241B Airport Wy S Seattle 98134 DC /N=17-0115-000 D010195725 Cl LIDCO ' ^'t- Bayside Waste H`7113'S'-196th117'; Kentriff' TP fi, '9�,hz;98031'DCW;OST'R N-171 5005-000 ` Cl Lindal Property " M '' :Lindal .Cedar Ho'-72nd Ave.°S.":& S: 196th;S4enthl w^1&ar.r 6:98032nW7'f°.* N-17I0006-102 WAD009261991 C2 Lockheed Shipbldg. Co. Ya 2929 16th Ave SW Seattle 98134 DC N-17-5006-000 Cl Longview Fibre Co. 5901 E. Marginal, Way S. Seattle 98134 BT,DC N-1710021-007 N Lovstead Industries 3300 Airport Wa S. Seattle 98108 LD . N-29-6006-000 D009252040 C2 LTV Energy Products 500 Metcalf St • Sedro Wooley 98284 . . N-37-0027-000 D980511646 C2 Lummi Indian Reser. Dump Chief Martin Rd - Bellingham 98226 Ql-2 2/) ECOLOGY - NWRO (• l ardous Waste Investigation & Cleanup Progr,._ �_/ ; SMIS Alphabetical Listing April 6, 1990 . : • SITE • HWCP ID EPA NO CAT6 SITE NAME ALIAS NAME LOCATION ADi1RESS CLOSEST CITY ZIP STAFF OTHER . N-37-0028-000 D980833925 C2 Lummi Shore Dump Hwy 520, WNW of City Bellingham 98227 ' N-37-0010-000 D980835318 N Lynden Airport 8631 Depot Rd Lynden 98227 CB N-31-0020-000 D009488651 N Lynnwood Plating 2107 196th SW Lynnwood 98036 CB N-17-0008-000 D980723985 C2 L-Bar Products Inc, Industrial Mine'26000 Blk Diamond/Ravensd Seattle 98051 N-17-0118-000 D053822623 C2 Magnolia Fertilizer ' 1144 Ballard Way Seattle 98133 N-17-0192-000 Cl Malarkey Asphalt Co. 8700 Dallas Ave. S. Seattle 98108 DC N-31-0021-000 D980639736 C2 Maltby Warehouse & Field S End of Yew Rd Maltby 98290 sN-17�0119-000 D000711846 .., N .. Mannesmann Tally Corp. '.,::a;!;;!,,yr Till q' . 7r8301 8 180':St'r 7,g'9:.'V FKen'tillgr'Mti,FP98031I'gR .41=47=0029-000 ... ..,, ,:. ,..... Cl Maralcp ..;p rip...,n,,, ,;, fIRA�� : ,.'•ti!,h. „� _.r; .t;i:i's; 7730'S:"1'T02nd�t� ^'4"; r�a�;t:.1Ken'ii^KPP' rU_ . f :98032•��IIS.,.0NP, ; N-29-0007-000 D980638944 N March Point Landfill Whi'tmarsh Dump/ 1/4 Mi E of BN's Whitmars Anacortes 98221 KF N-17-0120-000 D980639827 N Marine Disposal Corporate Pier 35 Seattle . 98134 DC N-17-0202-000 WAD980974521 Cl Marine Vacuum Service, In 1516 S. Graham St. • Seattle 98108 NP N-17-0121-000 D980722607 N Maritime Building 911 Western Seattle '98136 N-17-I0122-000 D063346597 C2 Mastercraft Metal Finishi 1175 Harrison St • Seattle 98109 N-15-I0008-000 D060051356 N Melco Manufacturing '2845 N Goldie Rd Oak Harbor 98277 , N-17-0156-000 D980834006 C2 Meridian Landfill Corliss Landfil 170th N & Meridian Ave. Seattle 98133 N-17J0123-000 D009272741 C2 Metal Laundry Incorporate 614 12th Seattle 98122 N-17-0124-000. D000854026 N Metro Alki Treatment Plan 3380 Beach DR SW Seattle , 98116 4-17-0203-000 Cl Metro Lake Union Facility 1602 N. Narthlake Way ' Seattle 98103 LD,DC. • • 1-17-I0038-000 D980639470 N Metro North Bus Base South Sect, Cor N 165 St. & 1st Ave NE Seattle 98133 GC,RD 1-17-0027-000 N Metro South Base 11911 E. Marginal Way S. Seattle 98168 MT,DC N-17�0207-000 C2 METRO- Central Operating 1333 Airport Way S Seattle 98134 DC N-17-5018-000 Cl'; Mill'Creek Site'• ;';'4 • ,,'gig;"r''', c177,W; Valley'''Hwy:I&•S 1196thm-leAtra API ,88032 CW r N=17-0033-000 • • ' ' Cl Mobil Bulk Facility- Rent .-.,,,'- ,,.,.i .'' Pr.q2423'Lind Ave. SIVtFrn°TArll;tRentomny ;mr ^z.s98055;EL4NP„Dp • N-17-5001-000 CI Mobil Oil- Canal Bulk Pla ' 1101 NW 45th St. Seattle 98107 LD RK, 6 N-31-5006-000 Cl Mobil Oil- Everett, Bulk Mobil Oil Bulk 2731 Federal Ave • Everett 98201 CB N-17-5002-000 •C1 Mobile Truck Service 2214 4th Ave. S. Seattle 98134 MT,DC • N-31-0022-000 D980975957 Cl Monroe Landfill 'T28N,R6E,Sec26 ' Monroe 98272 4-17-0020-000 WAD981772858 Cl Monterey Apartments Site Union 76 CB/Arn 622 !st Av WI Queen Ave N Seattle 98109'DS,DC N-17-0157-000 D980726327 Cl MST Chemicals, Inc. Port of Seattle 6020 W Marginal SW • Seattle 98108 DC N-29-0003-000 Cl Mt Vernon Gasoline Spill College Wy & Freewy Dr- S Mt. Vernon 98273 JH,DM N-37-0036-000 D009250564 • C2 Murray Chris-Craft Cruise Uniflite Inc. 9th & Harris Bellingham 98225 N-17-0126-000 D980976104 C2 Newcastle Mine Timber Shp Coal Creek Deve Newcastle Coal Cr Rd, Sec Issaquah 98027 ' N=17-0127-000 D980977250 C2 Newcastle Mine-Air Vent Newcastle Coal Cr Rd, Sec Issaquah 98027 ' N-11 i0014-000 D980723852 C2 Newcastle/Coal Creek Land Palmer Coking & Newcastle Coal Cr Rd, Sec Issaquah 98027 KD,GC N-37-0031-000 D980723258 C2 Newhalem Dump '1 mile West of Newhale■ Newhalen . 98283 CW N-17-0006-013 Cl Non-Ferrous Metals, Inc. 2905 13th Ave. SW Seattle 98134 DC,LD N-37-0032-000 D057315624 N Nooksack Valley Disposal 250 BirchBay Lynden Lynden 98264 . N-17-0128-000 D009260969 N North Coast Chemical Co • 6300 17th AV S Seattle 98108 N-17-0129-000 D000066084 Cl Northwest Cooperage Co., Second St. Ditc 7152 1st Av S Seattle 98108 DC LD ' N-17-0130-000 D058367152 C2 Northwest EnviroService I Western Tank Pr 1500 Airport Way S Seattle 98134 BS,DC N-31-0023-000 D980738223 N Northwest Garbage 1821 180 SE • Bothell 98011 N-29-0008-000 D009624347 Cl Northwest Petrochemical C 708 N Texas Rd, March Poi Anacortes - 98221 KF N-37-0037-000 0980979207 Cl Northwest Pipeline Corp.- Sumas Dist 4738 Jones Roa Sumas 98295 L. SI N-31 i0024-000 D980724165 N Northwest Transformer Ser 6510 216 St SW UnitC Mountlake Terra 98043 N-17-10131-000 D980833479 N Northwest Transformer Ser 33729 9th Ave S Federal Way 98003 N-37-0007-000 ' C2 Northwest Trnsfrmr-Geodwi Off Goodwin Rd. by So. Pa Everson • 98247 N-17-�5010-000 • Cl NW College- Assemblies of 11102 NE 53rd.St. • Kirkland 98033 NP N-17-5014-000 C2 NW Market St, Site Fentron Industr 2801 NW Market St. Seattle 98107 DM,LD N-17-5007-000� D017559327 C2 N.C. Machinery 17025 West Valley Hwy. ' Tukwila 98188 TH N-15-0009-000 D980639173 C2 Oak Harbor Landfill Goldie Rd Oak Harbor 98277 J8 N-37-0008-000 D008957243 Cl Deser Cedar 730 Marine Dr • Bellingham 98225 DN. N-37-0038-000 C2 Olivine Ash Landfill 928 Thomas Rd. Bellingham 98226 . , , ,... r - - \ . . , d; . / ) , ECOLOGY - NWRO / ,..__irdous Waste Investigation & Cleanup Program SMIS Alphabetical.Listing , April 6, 1990 ' . SITE HWCP ID EPA NO CATS SITE NAME ALIAS NAME LOCATION ADDRESS: • CLOSEST CITY ZIP STAFF OTHER ' N-31-5005-000 Cl Olympic Foreign Auto Wrec 2947 Fulton St. ' Everett 98201 N-17-0132-000 D047487103 N Olympic Home Care Product 1141 NW 50th Seattle 98107 N-17-I0006-009 ' M Olympic Pipe Line Co. 2444 13th Ave. SW Seattle 98134,DC , N-29-5001-000 D000641746 L Olympic Pipe Line- Allen . Allen Pump Stat Hwy. 20, West of Avon-All Burlington 99233 CB • IN-:17-�0206-0005 , , .,.,. ....�,, C2•:Olympic Steamship'Co:;I'�In,i,.,''r� T t�;�a��;;, ,,,.,,��-7 r:,8220rSf212th-5t,`a-1 �:;? ?;t KeAt4�e�f4Ts .,.. ,ry�,980317NP N-18-0004-000 0042804971 L Olympic View Sanitary Ldf Brem-Air Dispos 10015 SW Barney White Rd Port Orchard 98366 DW 4-31 0025-000 D980639066 N Oso Landfill 31705 Lk Cavenaugh Arlington 98223 CB N-2910009-000 D980639090 C2 P M Northwest Dump Hwy 20 Swinomish I R Anacortes 98221 • N-17-0028-000 D009249210 B PACCAR • Pacific Car & F 1400 N 4th St Renton 98055 LC,6C N-17-0133-000 D980724223 C2 Pacific Chem & Cleaning C 2200 4th S Seattle 98134 DC N-17-I0134-000 D051239960 C2 Pacific Chemical • 500 7th Ave. S Kirkland 98033 NP N-17-0021-011 L Pacific Iron & Metals . 2230 4th Ave. S. Seattle . 98125 LD -- N-17-0135-000 D980639710 C2 Pacific Landfill S of 3 Av SE/White River Pacific 98047 N-17-0201-000 C2 Pacific Marine Environ. L 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle 98115 6OODM N-17-0006-010 C2 Pacific Molasses Co. 3200 11th Ave. SW Seattle • 98134 DC N-31-0035-000 D980979679 CI Pallister Paint 1037 Center road Everett 98204 CB;LD . N-17-0179-000 0003781143 C2 Palmer Coking Coal Co. . 31407 Hwy 169 Black Diamond 98010 D6,SS N-17-5004-000 Cl Petersen Site 4315 11th Ave. NW Seattle 98107 SC JH N-17-0137-000 D009277518 N Pioneer Enamel Manufactur 5531 Airport Way S Seattle 98108 N-17-5012-000 Cl Pioneer Lumber & Treating LECO, Inc.; 1080 W. Ewing Seattle , 98119 LD N-17-5029-000 D009277518 Cl Pioneer Porcelain Enamel. Pioneer Enamel 5531 Airport Way S. , Seattle, Wa , 98108 NP N-1810013-000 D980975858 C2 Pioneer Quarry Site-Propo T24N,R1E,Sec 20 Bremerton 98310 N-1710139-000 D980738686 N Poles Incorporated 826 102 NE . ' Bellevue 98004 N-17-0021-013 Cl Precision Engineering 12131 So Director . Seattle 98108 BT LD, J N-17-0140-000 D059315069 N Preservative Paint Compan 5410 Airport Way' S Seattle 98108 N-3710009-000 D980975007 N Pt. Roberts Landfill Whatcom County 2030 Benson Rd Point Roberts 98281 DN N-17-0141-000 D008034191 C2 Puget Sound Tug & Barge Crowley Maritim' 1102 SW Massachusett Seattle 98121 N-17-10142-000 D980738553 N Quadrant Corporation 34461 9th Ave S , Federal Way 98003 N-17-0016-000 D980639215 Cl Quendall Terminals • Reilly Tar & Ch 4503 Lake Washington Blvd Renton 98055 6C - N-17-0170-000 D980511869 Cl Ravenna Landfill U of N Montlake S of NE 45th & E of Montt Seattle • 98105 LD 4-17-0185-000 D981771561 C2 Redondo Oil Pit, King Co. • 16th Ave S & SW Dash Poin Redondo 98054 N-17-0146-000 D980723910 C2 Reichold Chemical 5900 N Marginal Way Seattle 98106 DC N-17-0100-000 D980978001 C2 Renton Highlands Landfill Highlands Landf NE 3rd St., N of NE 4th S Renton 98053 N=17I0147=000.'D980639652��'+ C2�' Renton;Junction Landfill Fr•±{ 1A 'rt,-,-,� 1800-MonsterRd a Renton T'a a �98055r0Sw N-17i0148-000 D980639314 N Renton Transfer Sta S of NE 4th St Renton 98057 N-17-0046-000 D098556046 M Repair Technology, Inc. Advance Hard Ch 400 S. 96th . Seattle 98108,LD N-17-0125-000 D009282302 C2 Rhone-Poulenc Inc. . . Monsanto Corp- 9229 E Marginal Ny S Seattle 98108 DC DL N-17-5008-000 Cl Rose Hill Plaza 8510-60 122nd Ave. NE Kirkland . 98033 LA N-17=0149-000 D009261769 N Rudd Paint and Varnish Co 1608-30 15th Ave N Seattle 98119 N-37-0023-000 D009250036 Cl R.G. Haley Intl Corp Foot of Cornwall Av Bellingham 98225 J6 N-17-5009-000' Cl Salmis Land Co. Site B.M.P. Inc.; Du 647 S. Alaska.St. Seattle 98108 NP . N-3175007-000 Cl San Juan Pools • 18300 Bothell Hwy.SE (S.R Bothell 98012 NP N-1710006-103 D048681316 Cl Seafab Metal Corp. 2700 16th Ave. SW Seattle 98134 HF,DC JS N-17-0006-104 D048681316 L Seafab Metal- Surface Imp 2700 16th Ave. SW Seattle 98134 HF N-17-0150-000 D980726384 C2 Seattle City Light Storag South Service C 3613 Fourth Ave S Seattle • 98108 CW N-1770006-018 D027470426 Cl Seattle Iron & Metals 2955 11th Ave. SW Seattle 98134 MT,DC N-17'0151-000 D980833941 N Seattle N Transfer Statio 34th N & Carr.Pl Seattle 98103 N-17-0153-000 D001533538 N Seattle Post Intelligence 521 Wall ST Seattle 98121 N-17-0154-000 D009252016 N Seattle Rendering Works, 5795 S 130th PL ' Seattle 98168 N-17-0155-000 D980833826 N Seattle So Transfer Stati 8100 2nd AV S , • Seattle 98118 N-17-5024-000 Cl Seattle Steam Co. (Post A 700 Post Ave. Seattle . 98101 NP; . N-17-5023-000 Cl Seattle Steam Co. (Nester 1319 Western Ave. • Seattle 98101 NP, D N-17-0059-000 D009265851 C2 Seattle Steel, Inc. Bethlehem Steel 2414 SW Andover Seattle ' 98106 DC : ' -, 7, .(l) ECOLOGY - NWRO ) y ardous Waste Investigation & Cleanup Progr__ • SMIS Alphabetical Listing . • April 6, 1990 SITE HWCP ID EPA NO CAT6 SITE NAME • ALIAS NAME LOCATION ADDRESS CLOSEST CITY ZIP 'STAFF OTHER • N-171-0006-012 C2 Seattle, Port of- Leckenb Leckenby Co. c/ 9819 46th Ave SW Seattle 98134 DC N-170024-000 0980835763 Cl Seattle, Port of, Term 5 26th Av SW & W Marginal W Seattle 98126 N-17-0021-012 Cl Seattle, Port of- Termina Port of Seattle, Seattle . . 98134 DC KB . N-29-0004-000 • N Sedro Wooley Gas Spill/Le 220 Ferry St. ' Sedro Woolley ' 98284•JH,DM ' N-37-5001-000 Cl Semiahmoo Resort Property Alaska Packers 9550 Semiahmoo Parkway Blaine 98230 JH,6C N-17-0006-019 Cl Shell, Old-.Term 18/Port Seattle, Port o Part of Terminal 18 . Seattle 98134 DC ' N-17-0006-020 Cl Shell- Tank Farm 2720 13th Ave SW- Termina Seattle • 98134 MT,DC N-31t0028-000 D980977383 C2 Simpson Paper Co.- Pulp P Simpson Lee Pap NE of S 3rd Av at 48th St Everett . 98201 N-170159-000 D076651173 ' C2 Sinclair & Valentine, L.P 655 S. Andover St. Seattle 98108 DC N-31-0005-000 0980833727 Cl Sisco Landfill 7500 Wade Rd • Arlington 98223 N-31-0029-000 0980976070 C2 Snohomish Landfill ' 68th SE & 118th Dr SE Snohomish 98290 N-17-0160-000 0980738280 N Sno-King Garbage Company 8901 Willows Rd Redmond 98052 N-17-0161-000 0900511596 C2 Southpark Landfill S Park W of 5th SW Seattle 98168 N-17-0021-014 Cl Sternoff Metals 7201 Marginal Way E. Seattle 98108 DC fN 17-0181=000 0047482757 :C1' Sternoff MetalS Corporati Dak'sdale' Associ!1600 SW 743rUSt? ?". ,,: ,F+'Re'n'tbn WW11198055ZNR4' N-18-5002-000 C2 Stone Property 7480 Bucklin Hill Rd.NE Bainbridge Isla 98110 LD,BS N-18-0006-000 0980976328 Cl Strandley/Manning Site . Ron's Auto Wrec 15225 Willow Rd SE Port Orchard 98366 CW BG N-17-0162-000 0980976047 C2 Strip Mine No 3. 166th Way SE Issaquah I, 98027 N-37-0034-000 0900639264 C2 Sumas River Dump Site Tributory to Frazer Sumas 98295 ' 4-170163-000 0009249392 Cl Sundstrand Data Control I , 15001 NE 36th St Redmond • 98073 GC JS N-17-0165-000 0980664817 N Sunset Park/Tub Lake Dump S. 136th St,.& 18th Ave. Seattle 98104 . N-17-0021415 Cl S. 96th Street Ditch 96th St & Duwamish River Seattle 98108 DC LD 4-17-0006-023 Cl Texaco Marketing &'Refini 2225 13th Ave SW Seattle ' 98134 MT,DC N-31-5008-000 ' Cl The Alley Shop 1321 Broadway . . Everett, WA 98201 NP N-37-0035-000 D076207362 Cl Thermal Reduction Landfil 1524 Slater Rd Bellingham 98226 .NP,JS N-37-5005-000 C2 Thompson Property 7729 Kulshan St. Bellingham • 98227 NP N-17-0006-025 0009258468 Cl Todd Shipyards • Former Mobil Oi 1801 16th SW . Seattle 98134 DC N-17-0168-000 0980738678 N Toomey Property Site 28836 164 SE ' Kent 98031 N-31-0006-000 0580639256 N Tulalip Landfill US Hwy 99 at Ebey Slough Marysville 98270 N-17-0169-000 D045335742 C2 Tyee Lumber & Mfg Tyee Cedar & Lu 3737 A St SE Auburn 98002 N-31-0030-000 0009245259 C2 Union Oil of California 11720 Unico Rd , Edmonds 98020 N-17-0023-000 0988466371 Cl Union Station Site Metro- DSTP Int Jackson St. & 4th Ave. Seattle 98104 DC ' . N-17-0171-000 0021820022 C2 United Construction Suppl 18298 Andover Park W Tukwila ' 98288 N-17�0172-000 0044605244 N United Services 3450 16th Av W Seattle 98119 N-174173-000 0044038073 C2 Universal Manufacturing C 14410 NE 190th St. Woodinville 98072 N-3715004-000 C1 Unocal Bulk Plant i0042 Kentucky St. & Grant St. Bellingham 98111 NP N-2B-5001-000 Cl Unocal Bulk Plant, Orcas Orcas Landing • Orcas 98280 NP • ' N-28-5000-000 CI Unocal Friday Harbor Bulk . . First and Court St. Friday Harbor 98250 NP 4-17-0199-000 Cl Unocal-Seattle Marketing Broad. St & Western Av & B Seattle 98121 DC N-18-0019-000 8680030931 C2 US EPA-.Manchester Labora WA State Dept. 7411 Beach Dr. E Manchester 98353 GDODM N-18-0021-000 C2 US Naval'Hospital - Breme Boone Road • Bremerton 98312 600DM • • H-17-0200-000 N US Naval Station Puget So Sand Point Stat 7500 Sand Point Way NE Seattle •. 98115 . . 600DM N-18-0017-000 2170090060, C2 US Naval Supply Ctr- Drmo N of Wycoff St between X Bremerton • 98314. ' N-18-0014-000 2170023426 Cl US Navy Supply Center • Orchard Pt/Little Cl . Manchester 98353 N-18-0016-000 2170023418 C2 US Navy-Puget Sound Shipy 1st street Bremerton 98314 N-15-0010-000 9170023361 C2 !JSNAVY - NAS Whidbey Isla Hwy 20 & Ault Field Rd. Oak Harbor 98278 N-31 0031-000 2971590003 Cl US- Defense Fuel Supply P DFSP Mukilteo T 1 Front St. (by Loveland) Mukilteo 98275 DC,JW .N-1810010-000 0980639705 C2 U.S. Navy - Camp Wesely H W/Chico-Wildcat Lake Unincorporat 98310 . N=17=5022-000 Cl U.S. Printing Ink Corp, 17300 West Valley Freeway Tukwila • ' 98188 NP,PE . N-17i0006-026 , Cl Value Plating & Metal Pol 3207 11th Ave SW Seattle 98134 DC N-1710175-000 D980639603 L Vashon Landfill . 18850 130th Av SW . Sunset Beach 98070 N-17-0194-000 N Vashon-Nike Missile Silo 7 miles So. of Vashon Fer Vashon Island 90070 NT NED T' . N-31-0033-000 0009257841 C2 Verax Chemical Company 20102 91st Av SE Snohomish 98290 h ECOLOGY - NWRO ' '• - ardous Waste Investigation 6 Cleanup Progr SMIS Alphabetical Listing �_,/ April 6, 1990 SITE • HWCP.ID EPA NO CATS SITE NAME i ALIAS NAME LOCATION ADDRESS. CLOSEST CITY ZIP STAFF OTHER N-18-0018-000 D980639892 C2 VIP Landfill ' Kitsap Wy/Oyster Bay Bremerton 98314 ' N-3145002-000 Cl Wallace River Park Well 36010 Highway 2 Startup 98293 CW,AP • ' 4-17-5011-000 Cl Washington Industries Northwest Plati 925 S. Dakota Seattle 98108 LD N-17-0176-000 D027400183 C2 Washington Natural Gas 319 S 3rd St Renton 98055 N-17-0177-000 D050872170 C2 Wesmar Company Inc! 1451 NW 46th Seattle 98107 N-17-5028-000 Cl Western Batteries, Inc. Fisk Battery 1127 N.W. 54th St. Seattle, WA 98107 NP DM 4-17-0006-105 D980664668 C2 Weyerhaeuser Lab Pacific Resins 3233 Ilth Ave. SW Seattle ' - 98134 DC N-31-5003-000 Cl Weyerhaeuser- Lumber Mill 101 E. Marine View Dr.; M Everett 98201 DC,JW N-1740018-000 D067156489 N Widing Transportation Inc 24300 Pacific Hwy S Kent 98031 RD . . N-17-0196-000 C2 William's Lake Dutch Miller Mi Mt.Baker-Snoqualmie Nat F North Bend 98045 MR 4-17-0019-000 D009248287 CI Wyckoff Co-West Seattle • 2801 SW Florida St Seattle 98126 DC N-17;00025-000 D009252321 Cl Zandt Brass Foundry 3400 Harbor Ave. SW Seattle 98126 DC,LD 4•1.1v ` .( fK.. -f roq 55!ti5, .i,rr, •rfi" .!-Tg..r..,,r..7:7 177:!*+t7.7vi3;:.,*014 jtrimpl.m.m'?�" �fijm`�,�•ri 1 .t .:(N '.!...1 )'.''°.'t;s.;....7 r(.t ......,.r.(o.�,:?077,'�'rr"""7,Tr.:4 ..go i.�Bs:�n?'r!�F4ing! Ertl 1i��k' * • ci1'Y!4'yGi L;/4 l 7 l PP,";P1' ',I+,..lk'N`T1--r R: :iirr F'e.F.'C'i^7r^si..`1 T7.7"•F IMIT IYiI?I E4 Fi e0:011t1 t11.4-4 .r lrf ,, 4 (�.-,t, ..c-y rt,A,),1,�,,,, 1 : �.,,, ...•,:..,;Ic,;r.� ,., ,., ..,.�?1?i�?l°' '€� S a i(€c�' 71-t1�(3. TTyV A.:;•i I r/_ 1 n m, 0, a,!>>7?;r'f 1 ;(j;�7,;,7,7e:Frc�? :;717,it^'i 'T i:7,? :077 yi S � RADPW 44I,°:°►L,h-11.,.'1 ' rf i:,44. .0rA( eVviir' rr.,1pr,!.F liT, .r.:• ilif A«;,t.;r_,?;;.1#?W: ';' iy; w'irviaris3 ',hT '7M) • • 16605 1127th S.E Renton, Washington, 98058 May 24, 1990 Ms. Mary Lynne Myer PLANNING DIVISION Senior Environmental Planner CITY OF RENTON Department of Community Development 200 Mill Avenue South ' MAY 2 9 1990 Renton, Washington 98055 RECEIVE , Dear Ms. Myer, This letter is in response to the environmental impact statement which was released on April 11 as part of the effort to develop the area known as Black River Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery. Last summer a friend took me for a walk in that area,just about a mile from "Valley Office Park" where I work for Boeing, and I was amazed to see an enormous blue bird flying around in the open space near the tall trees. It kept its distance from us, and I can't help but think that the experts are correct when they say that `allowing these birds distance from the noise, artificial light, and activity of people is necessary if they are to continue to favor us with their presence in Renton. I believe that developing any of the south side of this area will cause the herons to leave this habitat which they have used for many years and will contribute to the overall decrease of their population in the state. The public hearing had taken place before I heard about it, so I want to take the opportunity now to urge you to deny any proposal by developers to encroach on this area. Respectfully, ' Alma Newsome PLANNING DIVISION May 24, 1990 CITY OF RENTON Na Mary Lynne Myer, Project Manager MAY 2 9 1990 Renton City Hall 200 Mill Ave. S. RECEIVES Renton, WA 98055 Re: Comment on Black River Corporate Park DEIS Dear Na Myer, I have recently had a chance to look over the Black River Corporate Park DEIS and am very concerned that the office buildings proposed on both Tract A and Tract B will have adverse effects on the nearby Black River heronry. The proposal calls for construction and development activities so close to the heronry that it jeopardizes the continued breeding success and conservation of this precious natural resource. I have had the opportunity to study Great Blue Herons at various nesting colonies throughout southern Puget Sound, investigating aspects of their nesting biology and the effects of pollutants on herons. This experience and a familiarity with the scientific literature concerning Great Blue Herons leads me to question the claims of the applicant regarding the effects of disturbance this project may have on the heronry. In Appendix B the applicants position(that this project's proposed guidelines would cause little if any disturbance to the nearby heronry)is derived with numerous erroneous assumptions between different heronries, with lack of consideration of important factors such as nesting success, and without thorough documentation. Put simply, selected literature and personal communications about herons appear to have been collected and manipulated (or unprofessionally interpreted) to justify aims of the building project. Breeding colonies of Great Blue Herons are a very special and relatively uncommon resource in King County and other heavily urbanized areas. They deserve special consid- eration and thoughtful policies to provide maximum protection from disturbance. Because herons are largely dependent on feeding in shallow fresh or saltwater habitats, their relative abundance or scarcity is a partial indicator of the quality and quantity of our areas wetlands. Like the canary in the coal mines, the herons can serve as valuable "indicators". They are a terminal link in many aquatic food chains and therefore can be indicators of changes affecting aquatic ecosystems. They are also sensitive to environmental disturbances such as construction, logging, land human disturbances in or near their breeding colonies. The Washington Wildlife Dept. has developed management guidelines for the Great Blue Heron (cited in Appendix B) which should be considered the bare minimum acceptable for protecting the Black River heronry. These guidelines call for. approximately a 1,000 foot buffer around a heronry during the breeding season (Feb.1 - Aug.l in this area) and at least a 750 foot buffer at all times. I would strongly urge that • Ta `Page 2 Comments on Black River Corporate Park DEIS the City of Renton adopt more protective buffers than the Wildlife Dept. 's guidelines in light of the fact that the Black River heronry is located in an area already developed to a large extent. It would be prudent to double the 1,000 foot buffer during the breeding season (ie. . . to 0.5 mile). A 0.5 mile buffer has been recommended for protection of breeding herons in a number of other management situations such as on our national forests. Of course efforts to identify and preserve the feeding grounds that the Black River herons utilize is also vital to your overall management policy. Thank you for this opportunity to comment on your draft EIS. Please keep me informed on future actions related to this development proposal. Sincerely, 5;47-74-1-1- John Peard 1704 E. 5th Ave. Olympia, WA 98501 7?L 44141E-e. n.p�� ' PLANNING DIVISION (� CITY OF RENTON 00 �� � ' �?rasa` MAY 2 0 1990 WOE. . RECEIVE,_ J - - v i t- 4.ake,t. /.c etA:,ar Jet-cede hze,t,ern dt-eg. ate- 444Lipa Pe-e-ttt 64.-a,;1.9 d-0 jid p mot. , . . kiAd yeectidolgomedel. (1144;m4 0.4, z. (4441;n•• .44-7,1A,,,avl Gut. Adtaalez frf,atet Ltetl erx,t4,1.0, 11141-4 f 4/aL . . , ...J. .,.., , • -.•1;*.",•-`'..;,•7'.'..,- .-:•.' ,'..-.-..'i. '`'.. .k.,:..:;•:.,•`,.:-,*,,',',;',,,-%:::`-' .• •.• - ..' .. ' .' .„. -Ar.:::,,, ':,'".."•,-%-..;'..,";',,.....c:,,.',,,, :'•-•:..4..--..-,.. ‘,...7,1'..:%.,:,`,.;::4-:.!":;-",,-.):.,V,I',,‘•',..; . , 1 .'.. ,`"•";”:::!', , ,:::."-..,- :...;:: .1 .),),.'• ' 1 , .• . . . ..• --°'''''', f''':-; 5•.' . •!'....:.":''',',;•',,,, , '..2'...:':•;-':.*::. -•'', ::.';',,-7-'2°. . ' I . • . 111 . . ,11 . . . •• 1 . .. rl • ,,... . ' 1 I -- 'I ••••",.-•.:••••••,;_•'i.••• ••••;: ".:". ••,c,.'••, .J, '',-•'.:4, '••', -',.`4,.••1•, .!:.• ;3-1'',- " ••.'°' ,5••••.','.1*,i".,': '.' ' "_." - - - - -- - - .... ••. _ ..., • -, 1 i , *J'.;,;;;'•;.-.:!-.`3",•*!•,,‘'...".•.,..'.. .•.,.''. '.;':'•••.) ...'. ••••,..'••',:.•: •,''•'i .......V.":, :2.,•• '••:., ',. ,!.,,•••,:;,,••.-i, •.,'..."A .„.,, .,,, ,, . „., ..., .,..,,,..., ...,- ,•,. „ '-- „ • -. , . — 1: , " .,' , ... • ' lo ,, , ":„, _ !, ,... , . , , . 5:1%.),:- :,.,.,,.;,,s.:...J. ..,.... ''..,).',..; :,.?:.... .',.....,.'...-,•?.:,.:;.:,.,;.'-i. `... .-, ;,,',-.•'...,,,.i..' ' -....,;.'..,..:,,..,.„.',..:, ,....,'„,,,,7,...--, -,,-.,.;,?'!,.-..`,,,..-, ''''„,.,.„..., .., ',..',',-'. 1 dl 1 I 1 i .-.... .• - ,..,.. ... ,,,,,,,,,;-1.,.,..t.:.,.;-. •...r„..',....,:;„....-..! •L..- ,.,,, ; •:, ,,..,,.. ..-..-.,.... .-,_r.,..:3.v- °'.., '-,.; :.' ..I......%:,. 1...'...,..1.-•',.. ...,,,.,„,,,,,.....„`?..',.;1:,,,...,•,''.',„'.,„ .,',, .,.....; ';‘'..i.'.: ',':..-,, ,:.,...':', f i'4:;•.;A..•••, ••',.....': •.I"). ", , ,,,,?„•:-•,? ,,;;„•,'''-.7) ..;",,,,..!..,•;.,:,.•,,..,:„ 1 .,. '•:,.:•''';,•':..,••', '•''''''•-•`.5..:"..,±* "-'• .:- ...'‘-.:°:....,1".1-:...‘';',. .'.7.:.'.,'P-i7.` ..:.•'':'.:, '....:!';',;'',2,\!..t'.'.'''.' '''i> . ',...;,.;1...)- c'if;' •-',•'!1,..','k.,,..:l'j.,,c,P,-?';',....' 1 • •;" 1'1 .r 1 1 III ., .'.+'.1.: -'.• ''..?. 1 1 i ,lil• 1111 11•, . 11 _ .. . . '[1 .1. • 1" • ..1 ! ' :.''..• •r.i.7..' ,' ''., ....'i: ';°.:.:I•J`. '''''A. ...'" .., .Il I 1 I..1 • 1 . 1 H.' 1.1 • , ll r,! I'll • :fl i .ash. PI SING DIVISION CI 11'OF RENTON MAY 2 9 1990 " „ram,,,,.r RECE ` D CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON98188 PHONE#(206)433 1800 Gary L. VanDusen,Mayor May 24, 1990 Donald K. Erickson Chief, Current Planning Renton Department of Community Development Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Blackriver Corporate Park, Tracts A and B Office Buildings Environmental Impact Statement Dear Mr. Erickson, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the subject E.I .S. The City of Tukwila has no comments at this time. Please inform Vernon Umetsu of my staff (431-3684) of any significant changes to the project proposal or new information which comes to light. 1 Sincer I ick Beeler, SEPA Responsible Official file b:rntn.eis • • May 23, 1990 Mary Lynne Myer PLANNING DIVISION Senior Environmental Planner CITY OF RENTON Department of Community Development 200 Mill Ave. South MN 2 9 1990 Renton, WA 98055 IFIECEVEr Dear Ms. Myer: I am writing in regards to the Draft EIS for the Blackriver Corporate Park development being proposed near the intersection of Oakesdale Ave and SW 7th St. I attended the public hearing May 1 and want to express my concerns in response to the presentation given on this Draft EIS. I work in one of the new Blackriver Corp. Park office buildings on Oakesdale Ave. , and so I've been fortune enough to see first hand this precious wetlands and wildlands habit and the waterfowl who live there. I also observe the growing human congestion due to continued development and have serious concerns about its destructive effects on the environment in this area. In spite of the mitigations proposed, this development is far too large in scope to avoid damaging impact on the wildlife that currently lives in the area, especially the herons who nest in the rookery trees. A seven story building, three 4 story, and a three story building are going to enormously over-impact the area, even if there were no wildlife habit nearby. Those large buildings and all the cars, traffic congestion, air pollution from cars, noise and glare will certainly pose a dramatic threat to the herons, particularly during breeding season. Research indicates that human disturbance within a distance much greater than the distances of buildings and parking lots discussed in the Draft EIS will interfere with the herons' reproduction. And it will probably result in the herons abandoning the site. Buildings of this size and height can't help but impose tremendous disturbances, both during construction and once in use. Much smaller scale, one story buildings would be a more reasonable "mitigation", constructed at a distance from the rookery that provides a buffer supported by the scientific research. Past logging and clearing have virtually eliminated any buffer to the visual and sound contact between the rookery and the proposed development. With seven, four and three story buildings constructed, the 20 foot trees proposed would in no way provide the visual and sound buffer the herons need to stay in the rookery. This rookery is one of only about a dozen left in King County; most of the others are very small in comparison. There are very few places for this heron population to go if this development pushes them out, since 90% of the wetlands in the county are already lost. Rather than threatening this rookery and the other waterfowl and wildlife living in the area with this large-scale development, we have a unique opportunity to preserve and protect this area. Wildlife enhances everyone's lives, but is especially important to those of us who live and work in urban environments. I strongly support the City of Renton in any efforts to acquire this site and surrounding wildlands. This would be an investment not only in the environment but also in our children and future generations who face urban environments totally devoid of any wildlife and preserved natural areas. Sincerely, )bf4 ge44/6/44( Jim Bernthal 3023 NW 64th St. Seattle, WA. 98107 r • • Andrea S. Cohen PLANNING DIVISION 6830 ?ird N.E. CITY OF RENT?N Searle, Washington 98115 MAY 2 5 1990 (206) 523-6018 May 23 , 1990 Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner Dept . of Community Development 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Ms. Myer : I am writing to express my concern over the possible destruction of the heron wildlife sanctuary that would result if the Blackriver Corporate Park development is allowed to proceed . In contrast to the draft EIS analysis, I believe that buildings and parking areas would be too close to the Heron Rookery. Without adequate buffering , the herons and other wildlife will be severely harmed . . .yet another irreplacable loss in a precarious balance between nature and man.. My concern is a personal one. It is not as much that I am anti-development as it is that I am pro-wildlife preservation. I find the relentless destruction of the few remnants of peace and beauty we can find in our daily lives to be a tragedy. In the past year and a half that I have been working in Renton, I have witnessed an onslaught of destruction of natural beauty. I am truly sorry that the choices that have been made in favor of development have taken such a toll . If this development goes forward as described in the draft EIS, the herons and other wildlife most likely will leave the area. If they do, I will miss them ! Sincerely , Andrea S. Cohen PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON May 23 , 1990 MAY 2 5 1990 Ms . Mary Lynne Myer RECEIVED Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development 200 Mill Ave South Renton, WA 98055 Ms. Myer: I am writing because I strongly object to development of property in or adjacent to the Blackriver Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery. Buildings and/or parking lots in that area will disturb the herons and most likely cause them to leave. Other wildlife in the area will also be adversely ' affected. I work in a building on Oaksdale, near the rookery. I see geese wandering in our parking lot and ducks swimming in mud puddles at the nearby construction site. If the forest and rookery are destroyed or disturbed by noise, glare, pollution etc. the wildlife will have nowhere to go. Wetlands promote and sustain life. By destroying them we eventually destroy ourselves . Sincerely, 77Susan M. McN . 815 South 2i9 th #3 Des Moines, WA 9 878-8507 ; _ =. • 622 NW 51st Street Seattle, Washington 98107 May 23, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Ms. Mary Lynne Myer, Project Mgr. Community Development Department MAY 2 5 1990 Renton City Hall 200 Mill Ave South RECEIVE® Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Ms. Myer: Enclosed please find my comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Black River Corporate Park. Having been born in Renton and raised in the Puget Sound region I have taken a personal interest in this and other similar development projects in the area. As an environmental scientist I have been professionally involved in water quality related issues in the Seattle area for the past 11 years. Consequently, my concerns and comments on the DEIS tend to focus on these areas of the environment. I look forward to reviewing the Final EIS and trust that my comments and concerns will be fully addressed. Sincerely, LSZck9-- /J- \-91411 Walter T. Trial, Jr., Ph.D. WT BLACKR COMMENTS ON THE BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK DRAFT EIS Page 2-3. Paragraph 7. Development of a three or four story parking garage within 600 feet of the heron rookery cannot be considered as mitigation for the any of the alternatives. Likewise, changing the previous plan to site a 7 story office building a distance of 720 feet from the rookery, cannot be considered as mitigation of impacts created by the development. Page 3-1. Paragraph 4. Because both sites have in the past received fill material from the P-1 Pond, the potential exists that this fill material is contaminated from upstream activities. The Western Processing Superfund site has impacted the water and sediments of Springbrook Creek which flows directly into the P-1 Pond. Elevated metals concentrations have been observed by Metro in sediments of Springbrook Creek. No mention is made of these data in the DEIS. Because the fill material present on these sites may be contaminated, the potential impacts of disturbance must be addressed for all pertinent elements of the environment including fish and wildlife habitat and water quality associated with the site. Page 3-17. Paragraph 4. Air pollution problems resulting from the parking garage for either alternative are said to result in possible air pollution problems within and beyond Tract B. Does this include the heron rookery? If so, what are the potential impacts? Also, inversions are only mentioned. What is the incidence of inversions in the Black River Basin? Their duration, frequency, and associated air quality? Page 3-17. Paragraph 5. It is stated that "the parking garage for the Proposed Action (B1) should have the following features..." Use of the word "should" does not ensure that the mitigation presented will be employed as part of the project and therefore cannot be considered as true mitigation. Page 3-21. Paragraph 1. The pertinent sections of the Renton Storm and Surface Water Drainage Ordinance need to be presented in the DEIS. The last sentence in this paragraph is unclear. What are the onsite project facilities? What is meant by "the receiving water (P-1 Pond) will be able to pass the 100 year flow"? Does this consider cumulative upstream inputs? 1 Page 3-21. Paragraph 2. A detailed drainage plan must be prepared before a proper assessment of impacts can be made. An approximation of impacts is inadequate and inappropriate in the DEIS. Biofiltration swales are discussed here for the first time with no description as to their locations. Assumptions about runoff being routed to such facilities are inappropriate. The use of such facilities must be specifically described. The location and sizing (length and width) of these structures must also be presented in order to evaluate their capacity to carry (and to treat) a given flow. The last sentence in this paragraph is unclear. What is the unused volume of the P-1 Pond? Page 3-21. Paragraph 4. Again, detailed drainage plans are necessary in order to evaluate potential impacts. On-site detention facilities need to be described and identified on the alternative site plans. What are the runoff coefficients assumed for each of the alternatives? Page 3-21. Paragraph 5. What is the excess capacity of the P-1 channel? Based upon what storm flow conditions? Page 3-21. Paragraph 6. The final sentence states "Mitigation could include improvements to the channel at the north end of Tract B..." Unless mitigation will or would be implemented, then it cannot be seriously considered as part of this DEIS. The integrity of the entire DEIS is compromised by such wording and phrasing. Page 3-23. Paragraph 4. No mention is made of the potential impacts that would occur as a result of spills of construction chemicals, oils and grease, diesel fuel, etc. What are the potential impacts to water quality and other elements of the environment arising from contaminants introduced from parking areas and landscaping activities associated with normal day-to-day use of the proposed site? What are the estimated quantities of these contaminants based upon the proposed areas of parking and landscaping for the site? Page 3-23. Paragraph 5. What constitutes proper erosion control? How much sediment will enter lower Springbrook Creek, the P-1 Pond, and the Green River? What are the potential impacts to water quality and the associated aquatic biota from such erosion? Page 3-23. Paragraph 6. What is the magnitude of the increase in contaminants associated with impervious paved areas? What are the contaminants involved? What is 2 the width of the proposed biofiltration swale? Will runoff actually flow the 200 foot length of this swale? This is not demonstrated in any of the figures provided. How will it be maintained? How often? Page 3-27. Paragraph 1. How will the oil/water separator be maintained? How wide will the 350 ft long biofiltration swale be? Where will it be located? It is unclear from the figures (e.g. 2-3) provided how any of the proposed biofiltration swales will operate. Will runoff flow the length of the swale (i.e. 350 feet) as the text would lead the reader to believe? Or, will runoff only flow across the width of the swale (no numbers provided) to the P-1 Pond? This needs to be clearly identified. In addition, those runoff pollutants of concern must be identified along with the specific pollutant removal efficiencies for the identified biofiltration swales. Page 3-27. Paragraph 2. If sediment could enter the P-1 Pond it could also enter the Green River. Quantify any potential impacts to the water quality and biota of the Green River as a result of erosional impacts from the project. Page 3-27. Paragraph 3. What are the specific impacts associated with vehicles and landscaping activities? These must be identified. General. Fisheries impacts to the Green River and to Springbrook Creek are totally ignored in the DEIS. What are the water quality related impacts to fisheries in these waters as a result of the proposed project? Page 3-27. Paragraph 4. It is stated that "This plan would likely include the following (mitigation) elements". Such language makes it impossible to evaluate what the plan actually will provide for mitigation of impacts. The reader cannot tell which of the elements identified are actually part of the plan. The word "likely" suggests that the mitigation elements identified may or may not be implemented. Page 3-27. Mitigation Measures. Item 7. "covering of exposed cuts as recommended by the geotechnical engineer". What is recommended by the geotechnical engineer for this project? Item 8. Should read "Mulching of all areas exposed for more than 30 days" not 330 days. 3 Page 3 -27. Paragraph 5. What are the standards set forth by the Washington Department of Ecology for the design of biofiltration swales? These must at least be included in the appendix to the DEIS. What are the proposed locations of these swales? Page 3-28. Paragraph 1. What are the pond volumes and pumping schedules that will determine detention effectiveness? Page 3-28. Paragraph 2. The absence of a detailed drainage plan makes it impossible to evaluate whether the mitigation proposed is sufficient to reduce the potential impacts of the project. Without a detailed drainage plan the DEIS must be considered inadequate. The statement "Mitigation would likely take the form of proper design" is inadequate. What would specific mitigation be to "ensure that additional volumes generated by development...not increase erosion in the channel at the north end of the site"? Page 3-29. Paragraph 7. Where are the significant vegetation resources of the site located? These need to be identified on a map of the site. Page 3-29. Paragraph 8. The last sentence must be modified to read "filling or development of impervious area must not extend under the dripline of the trees". Page 3-30. Mitigation Measures. Throughout the DEIS mitigation is described as something that should be done by FCDC. All such language must be changed to will be done. Otherwise, the mitigation described cannot be seriously considered as something that will, in fact, be carried out by FCDC as part of this project. Page 3-31. Paragraph 1. Where is the map that delineates these two small depressions? Page 3-32. Paragraph 1. Where is the map that delineates the 1.1 acre wetland? Page 3-32. Paragraph 6. Where is the map that delineates the 0.04 acre wetland? Would filling this wetland be considered a significant impact? Page 3-32. Paragraph 7. Is the potential alteration of species located within the 4 southern portion of the Black River wetland considered a major adverse impact? If so, this should be stated. Page 3-41. Paragraph 6. What are the specific distances involved in the statement "Viable heron rookeries exist in close proximity to parking lots at the Peasley Canyon rookery near Auburn, Washington, and adjacent to the Delta River Inn in Vancouver, B.C..." Page 3-42. Paragraph 1. What are the specific distances involved in the statement "Although other viable heron rookeries in Oregon and Washington occur in close proximity to buildings..." Page 3-42. Paragraph 3. With regard to the statement "The long-term impacts of the height and location of the seven-story building on heron use of the site is uncertain.", what are the potential adverse impacts associated with this plan? Might the herons abandon the site? Has development in other areas adversely impacted heron nesting sites? Identify these potential adverse impacts. Page 3-42. Paragraph 5. Identify the potential adverse impacts on heron use of the site given the height of the building. While the long term impacts on heron use may be unknown, at least the potential adverse impacts must be identified. Page 3-43. Mitigation Measures. The statement "Additional mitigation could include the following..." is totally ambiguous and does not indicate what, if any, mitigation will be employed. In addition, the mitigation items listed are unclear. What is meant by "shifting the seven-story building further to the slightly (sic) east and south to minimize potential impact to great blue heron..."? How far should the building be "shifted"? How and by what degree will this reduce potential impacts? Page 3-46. Paragraph 5. What are the distances involved in the statement "...great blue herons have nested successfully in close proximity to substantial generators of noise". What are the decible levels which will result in blue herons being "bothered by loud intermittent noises"? What are the distances and decible levels of disturbance involved in the example rookeries presented? Page 3-47. Paragraph 3. The statement presented is not clear. Use of the phrase 5 1 • y f "should not cause any adverse impact" is ambiguous. Will noise associated with daily activities in the office complex cause any adverse impacts to great blue herons present, or not? Page 3-47. Mitigation Measures. Again, use of the word "should" when describing mitigation measures is ambiguous. There is no doubt that the mitigation described should be implemented for this project. The question is, will it? Page 3-63. Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance. What are the provisions of this ordinance? These must be presented in the DEIS. How will these provisions be met for each of the Alternatives? Page 3-64. Shoreline Master Program. Discuss in detail the inconsistencies of the proposed office park versus a water dependant use or urban shoreline for the site. Page 3-64. Comprehensive Plan. Explain how a seven story building (Alternatives B1 and B2) can be a viable Alternative for the DEIS if it conflicts with local land use policies. Page 3-64. Zoning Ordinance. What are the Environmental Performance Standards that must be met for any of the Alternatives? Page 3-65. Mitigation Measures. What are the specific inconsistencies with the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance? How many trees are involved? Use of the word "should" is ambiguous and does not ensure that this mitigation will be employed. Page 3-66. Paragraph 5. The text indicates that "Because of the height of the proposed phase 3 building (seven stories) a mass of lit surface will be immediately adjacent to the great blue heron flight zone on the west side of the site." What are the potential adverse. impacts of this mass of lit surface on the flight of herons? On heron nesting? Page 3-68. Paragraph 1. Traffic related impacts cannot be excused simply because they were not identified in the scoping process. If, in fact, the Grady Way Corridor Transportation Improvement Study addresses the impacts and issues related to traffic, this information must at least be summarized in the DEIS. Page 3-68. Paragraph 3. The information presented in this paragraph is not related to 6 J the Affected Environment. Page 3-68. Mitigation Measures. Use of the word "should" is, as noted for other mitigation in the DEIS, ambiguous. 7 ice„ Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development PLANNING DIVISION The City of Renton CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 9 1990 May 23 , 1990int`ECEW ED Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990. I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, '190/ JAA/420000 -- Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including ' city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development PLANNING DIVISION The City of Renton CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 9 1990 May 23, 1990 RECE NEU Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990. I have a number of concerns about the proposed' development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, 7.VvL. Mrs, Kai, onai /4 pm N a g a f✓4- 5 'O Flo a).6 = �rz7 Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. ' Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development PLANNING DIVISION The City of Renton CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 5 1990 May 23, 1990 ECEIVED Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990. I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife . Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, AL) eira44- I } Please note : To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including ' city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. r.eir • 1 ATAk ADVANTAGE TIRE SERVICES 1 , Mike Setzer Manager 205 Logan Street South Renton,WA 98055 (206)226-2222 11,11 ta, i I Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development The City of Renton PLANNING DIVISION 200 Mill Avenue South CITY OF RENTON Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 5 1990 May 23, 1990RE CEWED Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990. I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, ,jd ,;170/4-- s 1 L. 66l rr 1orie9W . w1i W19- 9165-5 Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including ' city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. .A�, 44 cksoo Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner cq9 Dept. of Community Development Nfs The City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 May 23, 1990 Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement , dated April 1990 . I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. j o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, goad sb. to\ir 44 . Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including ' city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. i � AMMML Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development The City of Renton PLANNING DIVISION 200 Mill Avenue South CITY OF RENTON Renton, WA 98055 May 23 , 1990 MAY 2 3 1990 Dear Ms . Myer, RECEIVED This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990 . I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. j o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. ' o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, \C(1:07/ e_J .} z TA i i/dR 6Ae ru / 0-7 ONION 4-1/ NE RE coal q8057, 2,7C, -870(, Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. /.. 1 -T. Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planni�-ANNING DIVISION Dept . of Community Development CITY OF RENTON The City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South MAY 2 5 1990 Renton, WA 98055 May 23 , 1990 R CF D Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement , dated April 1990 . I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development . The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare , and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife . Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site . Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue . Sincerely, /6) OL5-- Z41' ftd-d-aZ_j 1 i . 3 Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner RiNNING O'JISION Dept. of Community Development CITY OF RENTON The City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 9 1900 May 23, 1990 Iin ECE1VE® Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990 . I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including ' city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development PLANNING DIVISION The City of Renton CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 5 1990 May 23, 1990 HE EVE® Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990. I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue . Sincerely, WIP/t) RDw(Ct it t1 /4r, 66 ( Saylor Re. ?2evW n Wi - 9flss Please note : To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including' city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. V. Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development The City of Renton PLANNING DIVISION 200 Mill Avenue South CITY OF RENTON Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 5 1990 May 23 , 1990 Dear Ms . Myer, RECENED This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990. I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife . Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, Boas 1/0 , aZr a OS-1 Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including ' city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. s • Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept . of Community Development PLANNING DIVISION The City of Renton CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 5 1990 May 23 , 1990 RECEIVED Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement , dated Apri1 . 1990 . I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development . The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect . My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife . Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue . Sincerely, Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept . of Community Development PLANNING DIVISION The City of Renton CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 5 1990 May 23 , 1990 RECENED Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement , dated April 1990 . I have a number of concerns about the proposed development . Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that effect . My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare,, and the heron will probably leave . lace Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife . Local extinctions may occur . � at bhp site--- Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue . Sincerely, CARROLL H. NEVERMAN 27 U PLACE NE. AUBURN, WA 98002 • Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Plann NNING DIVISION Dept. of Community Development CITY OF RENTON The City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South MAC 2 5 1990 Renton, WA 98055 May 23, 1990 RECEIVE 6) Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990 . I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife . Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, \1( m ei 7T OA 9ie <3 Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including' city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development The City of Renton PLANNING DIVISION 200 Mill Avenue South CITY OF P,EN ION Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 5 1990 May 23 , 1990 'RECEIVED Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990. I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the. site . Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue . Sincerely, LLOYD G.EDWARDS Attorney At Law 1299456th Ave N.E.Suite 120 Bellevue Wa 98007 , (206)606950 Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including' city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. ,4 Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner PLANNING DIVISION Dept. of Community Development CITY OF RENION The City of Renton �g�o 200 Mill Avenue South 2 2 Renton, WA 98055 May 23 , 1990 RECE V ED Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990. I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, (;;;2- 4110 (741A, Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including ' city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. ...• . . .-...'.. •-•— 7.41- . • . .. . . • . •. • • . : :. . . .: • R E N To N HERON . .. " • . - • c)-a •cs, • ILI • • • • • • - - • • • • —.• ..___. __..... ... . i i . 5 ?-- 2 N i-• . _• .. . • -- <-------•,. .. kA)F-ri...AK) D cl ul cc PJ1-1 n g•' -.*I''.? *:.''''''• • !. ." ...___ C.7 u_ r•-•I „.-so:-: .....:v.,...-4-----: ' .114. -..,,, a a .....„. ,f °°- ' ies• '--.'$•.:' r'-• 240-- ,..-1.... •.1, '1 '• • i'..;.'. •' • ..' ••••, ... ./ Lu ,0 . • .. . .• it....,....t. .,..0.. ,.•- •.„ .,„.... 5 5 CC or--.7....,.. . • ;cr.: '''' 74.01.= ..g.:1::".-:.•...tHR.:(2.c.,0'.u10.4:.1.7:ei•K':.€:.N3:16.111::14--::"-...."'.:...::..,,,,,...:.. --(,04\cpar..7____n_ • ivut. • t how.---\ ‘`... .; --ri,"_7.V'Ii',14.' . .. .' - • . oict,t1i 41'0 ' '2 •-•‘• .----—- '-',..L-,.,:4-14h.:,01'•' ', i .A ..' • • 1 ,t • • •• . { ve i •.:;.. 7- cra g E 5 7-- 4,..)-• ,,,........ ,:z . ,•,.7, ,...,.., FRE-6— \ ... 1 3•1i'Or•-5-S I (plu, .....*: ''''. • - .4 6%1-4\• Rs \iE.2-TEGFI SITE .0- 0.,.._>......„,. ter',,•-7 `7...-, I .PUMP -21- comi-assi-Vor) 1 t%;7' L.-- 't.ojETI_AN.11") ‘.- W41 03 et-A _ • 1 E.' r ,......._ 1- ) orF_ (E :1.5, ._ ..,„,.....- BuiLoiNsGs (P Rare ci-E b LA" REQWRE 0 = ‘) )Cit Ci-0-----p.,• -%RcjPEAtforprIC-r- mcisrr) ,i-TE) Tr. et s •p 11..4 pr.e" ‘----i---.1 '‘ 0(104 c.2 eat•-•p,\»-Z _ SPRIW,13P.o6R-pp•a.pc.v.e..1). i 1----• . S' `4•A-4 tiro 0,-.4 illb ,• 7-. 1 1---- ft I I 121 64-442-kjte3--- 41 b ALE Av4' ,‘ti 11111444 ').) i•-• v) c) .•, ' - . . , c•-, 42414saal k3' '‘Itil S. - . - 14 ..-. i ..-- ;;;,. elOs .12 I. G.1.-7.. Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development The City of Renton PLANNING DIVISION 200 Mill Avenue South CITY OF RENTON Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 2 1990 May 23, 1990 �, RECE VEI Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990. I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including ' city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. 1111791 , Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development PLANNING ON DIVISI The City of Renton CITY OF DEMON 200 Mill Avenue South ENTON Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 2 1990 May 23, 1990 RECEIVED Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990. I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, .I do not want the: heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, n/j7e27 /1/41 fie so i - v-e- s-- pito h e 00 7 Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address (including ' city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. Flf A'red 6'/zcr/c,i -?:_They • 1Rik Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept . of Community Development PLANNING DIVISION The City of Renton CITY OF REtvTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 MAY ? Z 1990 May 23 , 1990 RECEPVIED Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990 . I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare , and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife . Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. _/6u a I J J /: ,;c N Sincerely, L{d d,— &i i Tip a6 (h AVe, _c . teAfTh' c ?(PO-�.� po [lrt O CAI-L� /II2a N . ejXRT Nex77, hhe (4.1 i K F; R ,9 Goo A A ke- s.e d ,e s nAi LS Gv� // /Vt e u e `T`c, e T/l e /Z 4 G)i n e ee n s T To /4>c7i Ae e R s. 7-44- 7- 7A e- cagy d i iv /li e v TA Ls I t'e T kc, y 7 Mu C h A 4/7-.4 o ig i i B M G 0 V e f /VtA e ht Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including ° city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. I ,ie (Z i 4 e co t (cL be `S'�e .v Oe• //e K ,rK O 7 c/`C )10?ed''fir ����� Ae,/ems'® e7. _ UA-.T r. • i Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental PlannerpLgNNING DIVISION Dept. of Community Development CITY OE RENTON The City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South MAY 2 3 1990 Renton, WA 98055 May 23, 1990 RE Et Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990 . I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, /6k / 6)2�(-' €/v l 33O 7 /71//O/() ,gc1 JU, F, e&&n15`"O,1)� 6A, 7,V.ACZ Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including " city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. /, MIR ` .wy Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development PLANNING DIVISION The City of Renton CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 3 1990 May 23, 1990 giECEWED Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990 . I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry.. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. ' cerely, 17-- \ t%)) ) Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and\ directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including' city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. . G�Aa's d/7 -7- 7_`ilr_c ILL fr Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development PLANNING DIVISION The City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South CITY OF RENTON Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 2 1990 May 23 , 1990 RECEIVED Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990 . I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, GQ� "" z„, 6,), ‘ Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including ' city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. fYEef 6124'lit f) ,7. _ L/ 5 Mr 0 • Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development PLANNING DIVISION The City of Renton CITY OF RFITON VISI 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Iv/AY 2 2 1990 May 23, 1990 RECEIVED Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990 . I have a number of concerns about the proposed development . Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue . Sincerely, �eajva ,9 )'‘ /4 ..u.-aril 3 �� ag tee-,, of Carol L5h 01nec'e. I , 21 _ c l0 2 2 q s i. s_ #-G 3 .ti4--A-'02-A- -t.-7., PLO-M� - __ t4burhJ lAJq q c- ° 2_ Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. t lvYs t ,c/)J//cA ..% %IJt_s WOW Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development PLANNING DIVISION The City of Renton CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 ; 1990 May 23, 1990 RECEIVED' Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990. I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, �1 u G'cv E I ) c (it /3 56 3 nA.LK • So BidA -1/6r . n -©rq3 Please note: To complete-this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. / 9XE, 45 7,715/fo 117 L1 r NNW i l Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept, of Community Development PLANNING DIVISION The City of Renton CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 4 1990 May 23, 1990 RECOVE.0 Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990. I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, /1/ - Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including' city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development The City of Renton PLANNING DIVISION 200 Mill. Avenue South CITY OF RENTON Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 4 1990 May 23 , 1990 RECEIVED Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990. I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue . Sincerely, z'?-176' /88 /v/ Tor N, �� � Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development PLANNING DIVISION The City of Renton CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 4 1990 May 23, 1990 RECENED Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement , dated April 1990 . I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : a Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, Mice d ygk'0LD DE C SAS tivi.mteli1 y g 34, 7 � Please note: To mplete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including ' city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. .5/ /5 110 41 Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development The City of Renton PLANNING DIVISION 200 Mill Avenue South CITY OF RENTON Renton, WA 98055 May 23, 1990 11AY 2 2 1990 Dear Ms . Myer, RECEIVED This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement , dated April 1990. I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur . Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, /V _7,69° acAe/A . oz2t8/ /24,„ , Des �/d/eS 60/4, ??/7t Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. Leh*'/ 6 c/_ J A 5 Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development The City of Renton PLANNING DIVISION 200 Mill Avenue South CITY OF IRENTON Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 2 1990 May 23, 1990D Dear Ms . Myer, RECEWE This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990. I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. bV Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, j jr Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including ' city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. Psn' //C41/ 1/4 2 PgS 41) 410 Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development PLANNING DIVISION The City of Renton CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 4 1990 May 23 , 1990 REC WED Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990. I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. ' cerely, Did 'kfril i,1 2 5g-73 ®f toi (a2) 222 (KT Please note: To complete this letter-- Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. ,, 7/ 0 1111L— Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development PLANNING DIVISION The City of Renton CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 MAY 2 2 1990 May 23 , 1990 REC VED Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement , dated April 1990 . I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry . o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, . air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, c.Y.4//A- A/ , Jp6j f'e cei- e AuTv,u, A-• Flo-CZ w • op%/Is 4 Aft Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner L.' 90 Dept. of Community Development, k/I The City of Renton �I• 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 May 23 , 1990 Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990 . I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincere r .c/,JI e7-- Ti; „. _I__ 1/_ - 7/ • l _fir S •_ . Q Ms . Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development L 4),90 The City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 May 23, 1990 Dear Ms . Myer, This letter is in regard to the Blackriver Corporate Park draft Environmental Impact Statement, dated April 1990. I have a number of concerns about the proposed development. Primarily, I do not want the heronry to suffer adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed development. The City of Renton is responsible for ensuring that this development does not have that affect. My specific concerns are as follows : o Placement of the buildings and parking areas are too close to the heronry. o Without adequate buffering, the herons and other wildlife will be adversely disturbed by movement, light, noise, air and water quality, glare, and the heron will probably leave. o Paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Local extinctions may occur. Please keep me informed as to any development that does take place at the site. Thank you for your consideration to this urgent issue. Sincerely, 9'0 .5- iltvtal Please note: To complete this letter- - Please sign your name under "Sincerely, " and directly under your signature, print your name, add your address ( including ' city, state, and zip code) , and home telephone number. f/9e2f£Cd .</ /4" % J.d£S May 22, 1990 Mary Lynne Myer PLANNING DIVISION Senior Environmental Planner CITY OF RENTON Dept. of Community Development 200 Mill Ave. S. MAY 2 4 1990 Renton, WA 98055 R '.:> 1I��,i�- Dear Ms. Myer, N! I am very concerned about how proposed development will adversely affect the Blackriver Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery. We are already encroaching on their habitat enough as it is. Proposed placement of future buildings and parking areas are much too close to the heron rookery. Without adequate buffer zones, herons and other wildlife will be disturbed by movement, light, noise, air quality, and glare. Furthermore, paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife and local extinctions may occur. It is not such a great leap of common sense to know that we only adversely affect our own well being when we begin to tamper with the health of an environment whose intricate interdependencies we ignore for the sake of short-lived profits for a few individuals. Please work to prevent devlopment of this site. Sincerel` Phil Polizat o 4709 Meridian Ave. Seattle, WA 98103 \ • 1800 North 35th St. Seattle, Washington 98103 May 21, 1990 Ms. Mary Lynne Myer PLANNING DIVISION Senior Environmental Planner CITY OF RENTON Dept. of Community Development 200 Mill Avenue S. MAY 2 a 1990 Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Ms. Myer: ECE ED I understand that the City of Renton is considering developing the south side of the Blackriver Riparian Forest and the Heron Rookery. I am very concerned that this would render the area uninhabitable for the herons. They would be affected by the noise, light and movement that parking lots and buildings would create. As a birdwatcher, I know herons are quite sensitive to and fearful of human presence. I feel strongly that we need to maintain the environments in which they can live--and particularly breed--undisturbed. I would urge the City not to develop this particular area.. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Beth L. Healy r--;47Y h/<79d V. fides PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON May 21, 1990 MAY 2 4 1990 RECENED Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Renton Heron Rookery (Bleckriver Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery) Dear Ms. Myer: It is clear to me that noisy construction, polluted water run-off and human disturbance in general will force the birds off their nesting grounds. We should consider ourselves extremely fortunate in having a spectacular showing of herons nesting in our City. Everything possible should be done in an effort to protect their environment and keep them here. Molded correctly, the Rookery clearly will become one of Renton's main attractions as the eagles are to Skykomish River. Very truly yours, J ie P. Bonwell 616 - 146th Avenue S.E. Renton, Washington 98056 (206) 223-0800/271-0680 "792"/".07S74/ir -7- �ii�� May 21 , 1990 PLANNING DIVISION •CITY OF RENTON Mary Lynne Myer MAY 2 4 1990 Senior Env. Planner Dept. of Comm. Development ECE VE ir 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98005 Dear Ms . Myer : I am writing in response to the EIS on the Blackriver Corporate Park. This development will have a critical effect on the heron rookery. It will most likely cause the herons to leave. The proposed buffering is not adequate. . The herons (and other wildlife as well ) will be disturbed by light, noise, water pollution, air pollution,and daily movement of people and their vehicles . I feel that this area should be set..asirde as a park for the herons . There are other locations for an office park, but there are no other nesting sites for herons in King County. It is vitally important that the Blackriver Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery is preserved. Sincerely, (--80A.A5 COO-PLAL Barb Holt 479 Bronson Way N. E. Renton, WA 98056 5-21-90 Mary Lynne Myer PLANNING DIVISION Senior Environmental Planner CITY OF RENTON Dept. of Community Development 200 Mill Ave. South MAY 2 5 1990 Renton WA. 98055 FrECEWED Ms. Myer, We have been following the proposed development around the Blackriver Riparian Forest & Heron Rookery for nearly a year, and have become increasingly concerned about the wisdom of such activity. After attending the May 1st public hearing, our skepticism was strengthened. The speakers from the Audubon Society and the University of Washington presented a number of legitimate concerns regarding items included in the EIS, and omissions of pertinent information from the EIS. Their professional expertise allows them to be able comprehend the long range implications of accepting the current proposal, and they have serious concerns. So do we. The proposed placement of buildings and parking areas is too close to the heronry; there is inadequate buffering. Both the Washington State Department of Wildlife and the Fish and Game Department recommend buffers that are greater in distance and composed of larger trees than the developer has proposed. Paving the area would eliminate habitat for wildlife and substantially alter the hydrology of the wetland. Though the developer has added a storm drain filtration system to the plan it is unclear if the system could effectively handle the run-off of either a major rain storm or a lengthy period of rain. "Overflow bypassing" is not acceptable. There is growing agreement that Open Spaces and Wetlands are valuable in their own right. In 1981 the city of Renton acknowledged that the Blackriver site was the premier #1 wetland in Renton. The loss of such a unique and scarce resource to yet another isotropic office park would be a tragic loss indeed. Please reconsider this proposal, it needs a great deal more study. Sincerely, V Mark & Jean Ouellette 3912 1/2 NE 105th St Seattle WA. 98125 May 21 , 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner IIAY L 1990 Department of Community Development 200 Mill Avenue South RECEIVED Renton, WA 98055 Dear Ms . Myer: Please consider my comments regarding the Environmental Impact Statement for the Blackriver Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery. 1 . Reducing the size of the forest through additional construction would squeeze out many of the species currently living in the area. 2 . Construction too close to the heron rookery would place a great strain on the viability of the rookery. 3 . The infrastructure is not adequate to support more traffic in the area. Specifically, the railroad crossing has had many close calls for those currently using Oakesdale, and the large number of dumptrucks going to the gravel quarry present hazards due to the debris they leave and their continual obstruction of the roadways 4. Without a substantial construction-free zone around the rookery and pond, the wildlife (including the herons) would be continuously harassed by the noise, activity, air pollution, and building and auto glass reflections . Thank you for giving my comments serious consideration. I work in the Blackriver area, and this issue is important to me. Sincerely, 6„/c1,,k_ Paul Ju in 7001 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, WA 98115 �tt.� .r 114114e 7-1.1ts orry ir-~ - Wwa� r�� ��� �lj �� 20, 1990 ' Community Development Department Attention: Mary Lynn Myer, Project Manager Renton City Hall 200 Mill Ave South Renton, WA 98055 ' Dear Ms. Myer, On May 1 , 1990, you and I were in the same Public Hearing � Room for the City of Renton hearing on the Black River Corporate Park DEIS. That room and event is at very critical part of the American citizen participation process. I honor the City for following the SEPA procedures and establishing the format that allowed so many eloquently informed and concerned resident s s to pea` for the record. However, no tape recording, can capture the serenity and liveliness of that the artist' s paintings of the Black River Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery brought into the public hearing. I wish to highlight several very noteworthy comments that I concur with and that I believe must be addressed by the City. o Dee Boersma, University of Wash. suggested that the contiguous Soil Conservation Service land requires federal government involvement through the National Environmental Protection Agency processes. She also pointed out that the restoration of indigenous salmon runs by Federal Fish and Wildlife may indicate NEPA requirements. Air quality issues are another concern that would bring in the EPA to study auto emissions and CO amounts in theregion, not just in the �s d ki prop e par ng garage. o Joe Miles made a very thorough critique of the D E I S, section on Heron Rookery nt'Imbers, sites and viability. His commenteshow that the DEIS is sadly incomplete, inaccurate and misleading in Appendix B. � o Renton residents and taxpayers do not want Renton known for its business parks and office buildings, they want it � known for the preservation of areas of natural and Wildlife ! values. o The "birder" count by the man who spoke from his heart and from his statistics of arrival and departures of the � | herons refutes the DETS reportage of "Heron flight paths" . o The final speaker made brief reference to the c vehicular traffic problems and raised a very important question about the impact of increased office space. VK ^ �� . . . , - ° / I further add these concerns: � � o The developer proposes to place the buildings and | parking areas too close to the rookery. o Noise, pollution, light, movement and glare can not be adequately buffered by any of the plans proposed. I read the term "window hood"in the DEIS, but read no explanation � of its design, function nor reports of its usefulness in c projects. The DEIS is inadequate when it introduces a term that is not explained nor justified. The only way to eliminate the effect of these elements on the wildlife is NOT TO BUILD. In conclusion, I have followed this land use issue for two years. My pathway started with an incidence of wetland destruction adjacent to my residence, to attendance at the National Wetland Forum in May 1988, to membership on Seattle Audubon Society Conservation Committee, to frequent walks � and visits to the Renton Heron Rookery. This rookery was my "first" to discover and to learn about. I urge Renton to preserve its health and longevity by denying the development as presented in the DEIS. If agreement to deny is is not reached, then the city must follow the advice of all experts on herons and wetlands to require and enforce all mitigations they suggest. I am writing to the Renton Parks Department to urge that that agency purchase the site. I am also writing to King � County Conservation Futures Tax fund to urge generous funding for the site. There is a higher and better use of- this piece of planet Earth than for the Black River Corporate Park. Sincerely, uean Sundborg / | ' / | �� • /- _ . Sundborg • i1 S. W. 171st Street • r; v. Seattle,Wa. 98166 In the beginnrsn Inthebeu( Lithe the beginning lil sue... ... I, ... �N�... \\ ` C SIX CENTS.UNITED STATES SIX CENTS.UNITED STATES SIX CENTS.UNITED STATES SIX CENTS UNITEDSTATES UNITED STATES POSTAGE 449//in 41 n4 1l v , Depc74. .4 MI : ,M#K7 Pie A ,e v--, 13-3-7- (771 hifie . Re...„-t-44._zi, Ai( 2r 1'/ /// %e s /0-i'17n-i , a/A- ff0`7 5 so I • • ��Z • May 19, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION Mary Lynne Myer CITY OF RENTON Senior Environ, Planner Dept . of Comm. Develop. MAY 2 3 1990 200 Mill Ave So. Renton, WA 98055 RECEIVE* "Dear Ms . Myer: -- I am writing in response to the EIS that proposes development for the south side of the Blackriver Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery. This development will have extremely serious consequences for the herons , i . e . it will cause them to leave . Placement of the buildings and parking areas are much too close to the rookery. The proposed buffering is inadequate. The herons will be disturbed by movement of people and vehicles , noise , light, and air pollution. There are no nesting sites left in King County and if this one is abandoned, the herons will have no place to go. One can always recreate office space , but it is next to impossible to recreate a nesting place for the herons in this county. It is very important to save this rookery. Sincerely, kei, tibobhLoiL, Elizabeth J. Miles 22431 10th Ave . So . Des Moines , WA 98198 41/ 3306 NE 11th Place, Renton, WA. 98056, May 18, 1990. Ms. Mary Lynne Myer, PLANNING DIVISION Senior Environmental Planner, CITY OFRENTON Community Development Dept. , 200 Mi I l Ave South, MAY 2 2 1990 Renton, WA. 98055. EC ED Subject : Blackriver Corporate Park & the Heron Rookery. Dear Ms. Myer, • I wish to express my opposition to any development immediately adjacent to the Blackriver heron rookery. It appears that this is the only such area in the south end, and surely the only one in the city of Renton. With all the other areas available for development, it would seem the only objective in exploiting this particular site would be the elimination of the rookery and the adjacent wild- life habitat. Another concern relative to the proposed development has to do with the developer. If this is the same organization which was responsible for the Victoria Hills project, they have a relationship with the City of Renton that goes back many years, most of it pretty rocky. If the Victoria Hills project was an indication of their typical performance, the City of Renton might well expect another extended period of bitterness, confrontation and anguish if this project is approved. At the same time, the rookery could be lost forever. I urge the City of Renton Planning and Community Development Departments to approve only the "No Action" alternatives defined in the DEIS, for both "tract A" & "tract B". cerely, R_ 1 •h M. vans. /1117 Xe/ 5 2,</fie 2-r ' 111 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF 8FNTON MAY 2 2 1990 RECEDED May 18, 1990 Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Heron Rookery Dear Ms. Myer: I am very concerned about development in Renton, and particulary about the proposed office buildings that will abut the Blackriver Riparian Forest and heron rookery. It seems clear to me that noisy construction, polluted water run-off and human disturbance in general will drive the herons off their nesting grounds. I believe we need to step back and look at the effects rampant development in Renton has on its wildlife. It is easy to say that the birds can go elsewhere and that humans need office parks, cities need revenue from growth. Please consider that one more office park means more and more encroachment by humanity on the natural environment. If we do not change our attitudes and start considering the ecosystem and all of the creatures that live in it, we ourselves will die as a species. Please be a leader in the fight to save our sensitive wetlands and breeding grounds for other species besides ourselves. Sincerely, Margaret R. Gourl y / r I c%4/40 ✓ d£s M. GourleyIII 5 u C Us�2 646 W. Nickerson (, • .7, _rJ-,, Seattle, WA 98119 € M) r NoitYpak9ta 18 0 9 Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 iieitiliiiilli„el:lt,himiiil ,. , ---. ,,•- - : . .... 'I „....• . .,„ -...... ., .......-... ;:lt•,. •••." ....-. " " -...‘• • . . _-..' . . • • •.--.-,. '. _ _ --- .. ., •:•,01..., __ ___-- i . . _- --'- - • ir METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle • Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 May 18, 1990 Donald K. Erickson, AICP PLANNING DIVISION Department of Community Development CITY OF RE��TON City of Renton MAY 2 2 1990 200 Mill Avenue So. Renton, Washington 98055 RECEIVED Draft Environmental Impact Statement [� File Name: Blackriver Corporation Park Dear Mr. Erickson: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to Metro's wastewa -er facilities. However we have the following comments regarding Metro's water quality and public transportatiot services. Water Quality Drainage, temporary erosion control, and wetland mitigation plans should be completed and approved in detail prior to the final version of the EIS. It is difficult to adequately assess the efficacy of proposed facilities, mitigations, and temporary erosion control without a p;:�::sentation of the complete proposed design (in the case f 'the drainage facilities) or of the actual plan (in ,he case of the temporary erosion control) . Public Transportation We note that Blackriver Corporate Park has an existing Transportation Management Plan (TMP) . However, it would be timely to review the existing TMP an: update it according to the following actions and/or conditions. - Provide a free one-month bus pass to tenants at the time of each new tenant occupancy. The passes should be for peak hour, two zones - maximum requirement: two per unit. - Distribute site-appropriate transit and ridesharing information to new tenants and ann ally to all tenants. - Display site-appropriate transit ;a.nd ridesharing information in prominent public 1c)cations. - Appoint a Transportation Coordinator to promote and coordinate the use of public transportation and high occupancy vehicles. S/4/Ad V. 1li s- d wok 41/ Donald Erickson May 18, 1990 Page Two Provide lighted and hard-surfaced sidewalks or pedestrian pathways to facilitate safe and convenient access to transit or rideshare service locations. - Design and implement a guaranteed ride home program. - Design and implement a parking management program. - Initiate an alternative work hour program. - Establish a performance goal for .11igh occupancy vehicle use. - Provide preferential parking for high occupancy vehicles. - Provide a financial subsidy for aAployees who use HOV. - Conduct transportation surveys/monitoring. - Provide a bus stop passenger landing pad. - Provide secure bicycle parking. For assistance in revising and writing the transportation management plan, contact Carol Thompson, Metro Market Development, at 684-1610. - Overall, we are pleased to note that less than one stall per employee parking would be provided. The ratio appears to pp assume a 10% mode split transit/riders;iaring which is reasonable. We recommend that parking spaces be allocated to give preferential location to carper;ls and vanpools. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Compliance Division GMB:lag5203 cc: Carol Thompson Larry Adeyemi ORS W+ May 18, 1990 �/21 �La '90 k. Mary Lynne Myer f Senior Environmental Planner Department of Community Development 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Ms. Myer, I am a citizen concerned over the proposed action to be taken regarding the development of the Blackriver Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery. The current course has no apparent means to minimize the impacts of development on the wildlife inhabiting the area. I have some specific concerns. First, the plans have the buildings and parking lots placed too close to the heron nesting area. Unless there is adequate buffering, the wildlife living in the forest and rookery will be disturbed by the increased human and automobile activity. Finally, paving the site will eliminate habitat for wildlife. Some species would not be able to survive in the area. I recommend we find a solution where the expansion of human development cooperates with the natural environment rather than conflicts with it. The time and energy - the short-term frustration - will be insignificant when compared to the long-term benefit by all. eith P terson Kirkland �6�82Z_4Z6� -11 "1.- ----0"------ -'.': 1 2/2- /6, -4. , 44/ , ! . td,...7 . ill.r.* - iffiwf e, // z az/417033 . . . . ,,,• _ , .---. .......„.,...- _____, L'W.'"-7 IT'Lpno amrtst*...:—,.— (,/ e i260 • • • CURT SMITCH �� °a7( ,1& �� Director • �'8[/889 a°y STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 16018 Mill Creek Blvd.. Mill Creek, WA 98012 Tel. (206) 775%1311 May 16, 1990 <'< 0 4. itpo Nek Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner Department of Community Development 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK Dear Ms. Myer: Washington Department of Wildlife (WDW) staff has reviewed the subject document and our comments follow. GENERAL COMMENTS: The most striking deficiency in this document is that it suggests putting public resources at risk, without establishing the need to do so. In a recent telecast (King Broadcasting, April 25, 1990), King TV news staff reported an almost 30 percent vacancy rate in recently constructed office buildings in the greater Seattle area. With this level of availability of already constructed buildings, it seems needless to encroach, with the mass density described, into an environmentally sensitive and unique area. The second most striking deficiency relates to the great lengths the authors have gone to in searching out case histories of heronries which supposedly "coexist" with development--because they inhabit sites close to it (Appendix B) . However, the ecological data necessary to evaluate the real viability of these nesting sites (Table B-1, Appendix B) is lacking. Viability, as it applies to a wildlife population, describes a condition in which a breeding population produces enough offspring to replace a major portion of its own members, over time, and exchange members with other breeding populations (genetic drift) . The number of individuals in the population must either remain stable or increase over time. Table B-1 does not list the number of herons in any given colony, nor does it show whether the colonies are increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable in size. It only gives the number of nests in most 9 • ��xs_� s/zs/5d - �- ' - 3 • 1 • • Muller to Myer May 16, 1990 Page 2 of the colonies over time. However, in those cases where the number of nests are increasing, it is not clear whether this is due to increased breeding population, or whether nests are being abandoned and rebuilt further from the disturbances; as reported by Werschkul et.a 1 (1976) and Simpson and Kelsall (1978) . To then state that all these heronries are "viable, " we believe, is without foundation. The "heron protection guidelines" developed with the use of these incomplete data, are therefore, highly questionable. The third apparent deficiency in the document is the complete failure to inventory the wildlife resources utilizing the site. Our personal visits to this site have revealed that at least six additional wildlife species should be added to the list presented in this document (Section 3.5.3 and 3.5.4) . We have observed widgeons, buffleheads, goldeneyes, shovellers, gold finches, and pine siskins on this site. We suspect that a thorough and comprehensive wildlife inventory would disclose use by eighty, or more, species. These would include fish, reptiles, amphibians, small mammals, and additional bird species. We do not believe that failure to conduct adequate field work is an excuse to provide inadequate mitigation of impacts, or to fail to disclose impacts. This document's focus, relative to the natural environment, is almost exclusively on the heron colony, and seemingly, ignores impacts to all the other wildlife resources which depend upon this site. We are not suggesting by this that the heronry is not important, but rather, that all other wildlife is important as well. SPECIFIC COMMENTS: Table 1-2 (pages 1-5 through 1-14); the table states that significant areas of terrestrial habitat will be lost, implying that terrestrial wildlife will also be lost. This is true. In addition, however, the year around use of parking areas within close proximity to the P-1 pond will create disturbance impacts to this important aquatic feature as well. Our visits to the site have revealed year around use of the pond by waterfowl and wading birds. Secondly, the table states that there will be no significant adverse impacts to herons so long as "heron protection guidelines" are 411 • Muller to Myer May 16, 1990 Page 3 followed. The discussion in Appendix B does not seem to support this statement. A number of case studies are given in Appendix B, however, none of the examples included a man-made development including a seven story building and over 1,200 surface parking stalls (tract A and B) in such close proximity to a heronry. It appears that the so-called heron protection guidelines are more an attempt to maximize economic return--given the physical constraints of the site--rather than an attempt to develop the site in an environmentally sensitive manner. In our opinion, the preferred alternatives for developing these two tracts propose to play a kind of "Russian roulette" with the heron colony. Page 1-15, Mitigation Measures; we agree that reducing the size of the building would reduce the impacts to some extent. Not only would the building itself be less intrusive, but a smaller building would also require a less extensive parking area--which, in turn, would help reduce human disturbance. Section 3.4.1; Surface Water Movement/Quantity; Page 3-19; paragraph prior to Impacts; this paragraph refers the reader to a discussion of wetlands, in Section 3.4.2. We located this discussion in Section 3.5.2. Section 3.5. 1 also makes reference to this same section. Page 3-30; Mitigation measures; it is unclear from the drawings in Section 2 2-3 and 2-5(Figures ) just how much area FCDC is committing to buffer area for the P-1 pond and heronry. It appears that the area of their lands proposed to be committed to mitigation is only 15-20 feet in width. It would be more appropriate to seek out means whereby the project provides its own mitigation within the confines of the site. Page 3-33; Section 3.5.3; the wildlife inventory given here is incomplete. It is difficult to imagine how successive environmental impact documents could have been prepared for these sites, since 1979, and no actual physical inventory has ever actually been made, to support those documents. Page 3-36; Mitigation Measures; the so-called "mitigation measures" listed here are not really mitigation in any real sense of the word. Our Webster's dictionary defines mitigation as a transitive verb, meaning "to make or become milder, less severe, less rigorous . . . . " At page 3-34 the DEIS states that this proposal will eliminate all • • Muller to Myer May 16, 1990 Page 4 wildlife now using the project site, and replace these species with "crows, house sparrows, starlings, rock doves, etc. ". Presumably, the etc. would refer to Norway rats and possibly ferrel cats. Only one of these species (crow) is even classified as wildlife, and then primarily as a pest species. We do understand that a few other species of "urban wildlife" will use the developed area as some form of marginal habitat as well. However, the resultant change in wildlife species diversity does not constitute mitigation in any real sense of the word. This section also describes changes (negative) that will occur in species diversity of the wildlife using the P-1 pond. Although the City of Renton pond access areas adjacent to the FCDC properties will provide some excellent buffering of the pond (as soon as a multi- layered mixed coniferous-deciduous forest establishes itself) , we cannot imagine any real mitigation being accomplished by this vegetative cover, for many years. As stated before, we do not believe that the heron protection guidelines presented in the DEIS will substantially protect the heronry. These guidelines are not consistent between the two tracts, and they impose a more significant risk to the heronry than can be supported by the available literature. We have included a draft copy of the Washington Department of Wildlife Management Guidelines for . . . Great Blue Heron(s) . We request that these guidelines be implemented to protect herons on this site. In our opinion these guidelines contain the substance of a less biased, more balanced, survey of the available literature on heron ecology. Please note: These guidelines, under Management Recommendations, give a range of distance that should be disturbance free during the breeding season--based on site characteristics. Since, on this site, the potential disturbance will be unscreened and line-of- sight, the maximum distance of 1320 feet (1/4 mile) should be imposed. The year around no disturbance buffer should be 750 feet (or more) in width. In summary, we will briefly reiterate the major points above. . WDW finds the DEIS deficient in three major areas. • • • Muller to Myer May 16, 1990 Page 5 1 . The need to place these wildlife resources at risk is not clearly substantiated. 2. The information upon which the "heron protection guidelines" are based does not truly represent a balanced synthesis of the available literature on herons. 3. The DEIS does not provide a detailed and comprehensive inventory of the wildlife resources at risk. . There is no true mitigation proposed for impacts on terrestrial wildlife, waterfowl, or shore birds. . WDW recommends that the WDW Management Guidelines for Great Blue Herons (copy attached) be followed as a means of mitigating impacts to the heron colony. Thank you for sending this document, we appreciate the opportunity to comment on means for protecting the state's valuable wildlife resources. Please give these comments every consideration in your decision making process! Sincerely, /®s g.4. ` Theodore A. Muller Regional Habitat Program Manager TAM:kh c: Habitat, Olympia 411 LITERATURE CITED Simpson, K. and J. P. Kelsall. 1978. Capture and banding of adult Great Blue Herons at Pender Harbour, British Columbia. Proc. Colonial Waterbird Group 1978:71-78. Werschkul, D. F. , E. McMahon, and M. Leitschuh. 1976. Some effects of human activities on the Great Blue Heron in Oregon. Wilson Bull. 88:660-662. Lift r • Washington Depd,talent of Wildlife �-- Management Guidelines for Species of Concern Ardea herodias Great Blue Heron RANGE: Found throughout most of North America and extends into much of Central and South America. WASHINGTON Statewide. DISTRIBUTION: • HABITAT Great blue herons occur near all types of fresh and saltwater wetlands includ- REOU I RE MENTS: ing seashores,rivers.swamps,marshes,and ditches. They occur at most ele- vations,but are more common in the lowlands. These herons are colonial breeders,generally nesting in tall deciduous or coniferous trees near wet- lands. Although occasionally smaller trees or bushes,and artificial structures have been used(Bruce 1986,Blus et al. 1980),nests are usually constructed in the largest trees available, 'For example,a study in British Columbia found that most heronries occurred in trees over 50 ft.tall and no nests were found in trees under 30 ft.high(Mark 1976). Great blue herons feed on aquatic and marine animals found in shallow wa- ter. Terrestrial feeding in fields for mice and voles may be important in win- ter,especially for herons in coastal areas(Simpson,pers.comm,), Although documented distances from an active heronry to a foraging area range from 2.5 to 18 miles,most are located within a radius of about 2.5 to 3 miles from the heronry(Short and Cooper 1985). Feeding territories vary from year to year with respect to size or location(Hoover and Wills 1987), Alternative nesting and feeding habitat is probably critical to great blue her- ons. Colonies usually exist at the same location for many years,but some herons may naturally relocate their colonies in response to increased preda- tion on eggs and young by mammals or other birds,or declines in food availability(Simpson et al, 1986), Heronries built in spruce or Douglas-fir trees may damage the host trees over time,which may also influence colony relocation(Julie 1986). Great blue herons are shy birds,generally sensitive to human disturbance and frequently the target of vandalism(Parker 1980,English 1978). Herons have abandoned heronries because of housing and industrial development,high- way construction,logging,actively used roads,and repeated human intru- sions into colonies(Leonard 1985.Parker 1980,Kelsall and Simpson 1979, Werschkul et al. 1976). Other studies suggest that some herons,which are frequently or consistently exposed to disturbance,may habituate to human activities(Webb and Forbes 1982). Thus,herons nesting in different locales may have different tolerance levels to humans,with colonies located close to human activities responding less to disturbance than those in remote areas(Simpson 1984). Certain colo- rit( +t • • • nies may tolerate disturbance because nests are built in coniferous trees, whose foliage naturally buffers the effects of human activity,or they may be influenced by proximity to heavily used foraging areas(Webb and Forbes 1982). LIMITING FACTORS: Availability of suitable habitat which provides undisturbed nest sites and ade- quate feeding areas in the vicinity of breeding colonies. MANAGEMENT Individual heronries should be evaluated independently for their vegetative RECOMMENDATIONS: structure and past exposure to human disturbances. Where herons are unac- customed to disturbance or alternative habitat is lacking,heronries should be kept free of human disturbance within an 800 foot to 1/4 mile radius of the nesting colony during the breeding season,between April 1 and August 1 (Parker 1980,Hoover and Wills 1987,Simpson 1984). A smaller permanent buffer should be designed on a site specific basis to protect the integrity of the nesting trees from windthrow and to provide screening from adjacent de- velopment or distw ce. Where possible,this permanent buffer should en- compass a Pr.Zia-radius around the nest trees. The buffer zone should be closed to human access when herons are present(Parker 1980);human access should be closed or limited during the non-breeding season to protect the in- tegrity of the buffer vegetation. Great blue heron responses to human activities near the breeding colonies are not predictable. In situations where alternative habitat exists,it must be re- membered that heronries may naturally change location or fluctuate in size. Human activities which may cause colony relocations should be avoided un- less similar habitat is available within 6.25 miles of the existing heroruy (Simpson 1984). . Surrounding feeding areas,especially wetlands,should be protected within a minimum radius of 2.5 miles of existing colonies. This is especially critical where herons coexist in areas with high human activity(Hoover and Wills 1987). Nesting tree loss,either naturally or through disturbance,may represent a se- rious problem if availability of suitable alternative great blue heron habitat becomes limited, Therefore,stands of large trees at least 50 ft.high and at least 10 acres in extent should be left in the vicinity of heron breeding colo- nies and feeding areas. These sites should be located a minimum of 1/2 mile from actively used roads and at least 250 ft.from developed waterfronts (Parker 1980). Efforts to increase awareness of great blue heron nesting colonies should con- centrate on inventories,information exchange,and education, Nest sites oc- cupied currently or in the past should be inventoried regularly,and local and state agencies should be made aware of their existence. Where vandalism is unlikely,posting signs at heronries may help to increase awareness of the im- portance of protecting nest trees. REFERENCES: Bias LJ.,CJ.Benny,and T.E.Kaiser. 1980. Pollution ecology of breeding great blue herons in the Columbia Basin,Oregon and Washington, Murrelet 61:63-71. Bruce,A.M. 1986. Nesting of great blue herons in young managed forests of western Washington. Unpubl.tech.report for Weyerhauser Co. • English,S.M. 1978. Distribution and ecology of great blue heron colonies on the Immeue River,Chet, Pages 235-:rr44 in A.Sprunt IV,).C. Ogden,and S.Winkler, eds. Wading birds. National Audubon Soci- ety Research Report No.7, Hoover,R.L., and D.L.Wills,eds. 1987, Managing forested lands for wild- life. Colorado Division of Wildlife,Denver, Julia,K.R. 1986.Decline of second growth Douglas-fir in relation to great blue heron nesting. Northwest Sci.60(4):201-205. Kelsall,J.P„and K.Simpson. 1979. A three year study of the great blue • heron in southwestern British Columbia. Proc.Colonial Waterbird Group,Vol.3:69-74. Leonard,W. 1985. Inventory of great blue heron nest colonies in southern and western Puget Sound, Unpublished report to Washington Dept.of Wildlife. Mark,D.M. 1976. An inventory of great blue heron(Ardea herodias nest- ing colonies in British Columbia. Northwest Sci.50(l):32-41. • Parker,J. 1980. Great blue herons(Ardea herodias)in northwestern Mon- tana:Nesting habitat use and the effects of human disturbance. Unpubl. M.S.Thesis,Univ.Montana,Missoula, Short,H,L.and R.J.Cooper. 1985. Habitat suitability index models:Great blue heron, USDI Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 82(10.99),Washington,DC. Simpson,K. 1984. Factors affecting reproduction in great blue herons (Ardea herodias). Unpubl.M.S.Thesis,Univ.British Columbia,Van- couver,B.C.,Canada, ,J.N.M.Smith,and J.F.Kelsall. 1987. Correlates and consequences of coloniality in great blue herons. Can,J.Zool.65:572-577. Vos,$i.K.,R.A.Ryder,and W.D.Graul. 1985. Response of breeding great blue herons to human disturbance in north central Colorado.Colonial Waterbirds 8(1):13.22. Webb,R.S.,and L.S.Forbes. 1982. Colony establishment in an urban site by great blue herons. Murrelet 63(3):91-92. Werschkul,D.F..E.McMahon,and M.Lertschuh. 1976. Some effects of human activities on the great blue heron in Oregon. Wilson Bull. 88(4):660-662. • • WIWashington State Duane Berentson Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E. 30th Place Bellevue,Washington 98007-6538 (206)562-4000 May 15, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAY 1 7 1990 RECEVED Ms. Mary Lynne Myer, Project Manager Community Development Department Renton City Hall 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 DEIS Comments - Black River Corporate Park I-405 Dear Ms. Myer: This letter is in response to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement review on the above referenced project, which we received from the city of Renton. This proposed development is to construct as a four-year phased project, three (3) one to four-story office buildings (183,600 square feet) on 12.71 acres of Tract A and three (3) four to seven-story buildings on the 15.7 acre Tract B. Tract B will also include the construction of a three-story parking structure in 1992-93 . This development is located at the intersection of Southwest 7th Street and Oaksdale Avenue SW. A development of this size and location will have an enormous impact on state highways in the vicinity. Interstate 405, State Route 181, State Route 167 and State Route 900 will all be impacted. As stated on pages 3-67 and 3-68, "analysis of transportation was not identified as a scoping issue by the city of Renton and not included as a part of this EIS. " We are referred to the Grady Way Corridor Transportation Improvement Study written in 1988.. According to our records, we have not had the opportunity to review this transportation study. To properly review this DEIS, we will need to review the Grady Way Corridor Transportation Improvement Study. Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Chuck Gleich at 562-4105. cere , 1 ,e JE— B SCH Z De el. .ment Planning Engineer CG:ng 22/CG-MLM i • S 18434 42nd avenue South Seattle, Washington 98188 15 May 1990 PLANNING DIVISION ' Mary Lynne Myer • CITY OF RENTON Senior Environmental Planner Department of Community Development • MAY 1 7 1990 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RECE VE • Dear Ms Myer : • Thank you for extending t he peroid for comments for the Blackriver Corporate Park Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) . It is important that any development near the Blackriver Riparian • Forest. and Heron Rookery be considered carefully and completely because of the limited number of similar sites in this area . In the section on Wildlife Resources on page 3-33 I found no discussion of the migratory birds that use the P-1 pond and the impacts of the project on them. ' After driving home from the Renton library after reading; the DHIS on a Friday afternoon I have doubts about Ghady Way being. able to handle the traffic volumes as discussed on pages 3-67 and 3-68. . • On page B-10 it is stated that '"A majority of the information available regarding the effect of human activities on great blue heron rboker•ies is associated with Either short-term construction- related activities or in areas where rookerise have been established after construction. Only limited information exists regarding the effects of construction activities on existing rookeries. Likewise , very little information exists regarding setbacks needed to provide long-term protection to heron rookeries. " Due to the importance of the site and the lack of information on the impact of the project on the heron rookery it seems to me that instead of proposing guidelines that allow construction closer• to the site that the guidelines of Washington Department of Wildlife should be used for this project . Sincerely yours, diAA,_ Jr . 0.), , John M. Wolf • • • • riV, c��j"Ae -,/, i' s 5/14/90 Donald K. Erickson Re : DEIS, Black River Chief , Current Planning Corporate Park, Tracts A&B City of Renton PLANNING DIVISION 200 Mill Ave . So. CITY 0I= RENTON Renton, WA. 98055 it I / 1990 Dear Mr . Erickson: EC EI You have, for this phase of the development, received testimony from a number of recognized and highly respected persons in the scientific community, namely to myknowledge Dr . L. Sd©tt Forbes , Dr. P. Dee Boersma, Ted Muller, Dr. John Kelsall and Mr. Range Bayer. The Great Blue Heron and other wildlife are indeed fortunate to have such advocates . I urge emphatically that the decision-makers carefully study their documents . ( 1) BUFFER ZONES - Guidelines established by the Department of Wildlife recommend at least 750 feet . In view of certain unresolved questions re arding human disturbance at Great Blue Heron colonies , I firml ✓ this guideline should be honored. (2 ) A. NO==DISTURBANCE DATES - While the British Columbia Heron, as both Forbes and Kelsall indicate, settle in at their colonies in mid-February as do the Marsh Island and Samish Island heron 70 miles north of Seattle, At each of these colonies there is no sign of heron in either Padilla Bay, Samish Bay or the trees until mid-February. Pair-bonding, nest defense may take place at both the Renton and Lake Sammamish heronries anywhere from late December to January ' s end. On 12/25/86 I noted 8 heron present at the Renton heronry. On February 13 , 1987 I counted 28 heron there, far more than 8 nests could accomodate. These were probably heron seeking nesting sites . I therefore am in agreement with Bayer that no disturbance should be permitted from at least mid- January. B. Young heron fledged at the Black River colony between 6/20/87 and 7/1/87 . ( I was unable to visit the site during that period) . On the July date I counted 6 juveniles , loafing on the islands in the pond. It must be emphasized that recently fledged heron do not leave the colony for at least two to three weeks past the fledging date since they must gather strength to forage in a wider range . In summary, the no disturbance dates must be from at least mid-January to August 1 . I further emphasize that in large colonies a week or more may pass before all fledging occurs . (3 ) SEVEN STORY STRUCTURE- This not only poses a threat to the Great Blue Heron and songbirds but is totally out of synch with not only this site but with the entire business park areas . A suggestion to erect the building on tract A is totally unacceptable since it would then be directly in the flight path of the heron, their major route particularly during nesting season. 1 \ Murphy - Black River Corporate Park DEIS - 2 (4) FEEDING OFAATILD BIRDS - The feeding of wild birds , in particular Mallards and Canada Geese, must be prohibited by the introduction of a city ordinance which includes a fine for so feeding. ( 5) EOOD SUPPLY - GREAT BLUE HERON- Although I noted occasionally some adult heron feeding in the ponds , any fish brought to the young was delivered by adults flying to and from the south- southwest . Possibly the Tukwila ponds are one source, if they have not since been drained for a shopping center . Since only fish is fed to pre-fledged young heron I postulate that during the critical period prior to fledging the P-1 ponds are lacking in fish, or from] May possibly tollate fall . My reasoning is as follows : (a) The diet of the Double-crested Cormorant is schooling fish. Four cormorants were present March 1 and 4/21/87 , but not before or after those dates . (b) Bufflehead, totalling 30 pairs on December 25 , 1986 , and in less but still substantial numbers from November 1 , 1986 through May 1 , 1987 , are partly aquatic vegetarian but become fish- eaters during winter . Since these are diving birds it is difficult to determine whether they are eating aquatic foods or fish. (c) Only one other species , the Hooded Merganser , eats mostly fish. Twelve pairs of these were observed only once in 35 visits , on Nbvember 8 , 1986 . (6) PILE DRIVERS - On July 21 , 1987 I noted through my spotting scope that six young heron loafing in the nest tree froze in an erect position at the sound of a pile driver near Springbrook Creek. The sound created a substantial echo that bounced off the hills behind the colony . Please note that date of heron present , well after the fledging period between June 20 and July 1 . ( 7) Dr . Kelsall describes the absence of a list of biological diversity at Black River Corporate Park. I submitted such a list to the Planning Commission in 1987 . The table attached, adapted from the original chart presented, accounts for water , shore and land birds . Only one mammal was noted in 35 visits to the site - a dead beaver along the south berm, cause of death undetermined. Coyote scat was also present in this area . I found no raptor pellets here but believe they would be found on the hill beneath the trees there . Finally, I am in full agreement with Dr . Kelsall that "the developers of Black River Corporate Park are clearly playing brink- manship with the heron and possibly with other ecological values as well . " Developers stated in 1987 that they considered the Great Blue Heron "an amenity, " This materialistic view, not only of heron but of a whole ecosystem, is responsible for the precarious state of wildlife and its habitat throughout the United States, particularly when city governments are willing to trade off natural areas for economic benefits . Mrs . Marty Murp y 2016 Bordeaux Lane Half Moon Bay, CA. 94019 i.•r"re^r� _L / //e,c,,—/1 . /4"pr r , Murphy - Black River Corporate Park DEIS-<. • Table 1 . WATER, SHORE AND LAND BIRDS NOTED, BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK, NOVEMBER 1 , 1986 to JULY 21 , 1987 ( Listed in Accordance with the American Ornithological Union Checklist of North American Birds) Pied-billed Grebe Hooded Merganser Double-crested Cormorant Spotted Sandpiper Green-backed Heron * Western Sandpiper * Great Blue Heron * Killdeer 2 Canada Geesel Red-tailed Hawk Mallard Rough-legged Hawk Gadwall Northern Harrier * Greenwing teal American Kestrel Blue-winged Teal California Quail Cinnamon Teal Belted Kingfisher American Wigeon Violet-green Swallow Shoveler Barn Swallow Ruddy Black-capped Chickadee Canvasback American Robin Ringneck Loggerhead Shrike Lesser Scaup * Common Yellowthruat * Barrow' s Goldeneye Song Sparrow Common Goldeneye White-crowned Sparrow Bufflehead Red-winged Blackbird Northern Oriole American Goldfinch House Finch 1 Canada Geese nested prolifically. Notes from 5/27/87 : Four families one pair with 4 subadults; one pair with 8 downy young; One pair with 10 juveniles , 1 pair with 10 recently feathered. Thick understory on the north side of the P-1 po ds nd several small islands within the ponds provided excellen aathe geese . 2 Two Red-tailed Hawk nests were noted, one on the hill west of the Great Blue Heron colony, the other near the gravel chute of the quarry. It should be noted that (a) Great Horned Owls rarely build their own nests , but rely on "borrowineparticularly Red-tail nests , and (b) any disturbance to nesting raptors (or any nesting birds ) in the State of Washington, including interference with eggs , the young, the nesting tree, is in violation of state statute , a copy of which can be obtained from the Department of Wildlife . Two warbler species were present but were heard only, therefore I can offer no definite identification. Two Mallard families were also noted. * Species of concern due to wetlands/other habitat loss . PLANm/N8OK/0|KJN CITY OFRFNTAm / ' ' ' °'uo A 77 JIV a _44 7�,Zv�..v a_a_ lei 104 ___�--_- �������� �x����'-_-_'------'--'--- -------- -- ---- ' 1 - — --� — ! N p I I d N N 1 1 I ; , ^ 1 d ! I 1 ^ I • d 1 i f I I I I I N I ,I q I ! I 1 •' X I I I I I II I G I 1 f I f j I N ' ' N 9 i • I ! • I d 1 I y { d , I J Ij , ! 1 3 4I { i a { p I! ^ I I n I , I, II d • I ! I P 1 a jI N N i II ; I. llli 1 I d a f ,I N N 1 i I + I i N 4 I 6 d pi I I C I p I d I N f ) p I I ! r 1 I ^ a R I N I { II + I q ' I I! 7 1 I N • p G 9 ! I I d I V d I • , X , I 11 I I I I I d i I J ! ! II N I 1 11 I I r u I I �1----�___ �__— - —{___ —_ __ __ ,-- II _- iI ' II I I I I I 9 d I } 11 I 9 [ 1 d I d ; 1 1 II I d d ; I I I. y I u �, I ' ;, 1 I , l ^ ., I i, ! 1 1 a 1 ? Il ,. 1 I I $ I 1 I II 1 I I { I II i I ! 3 1 I I y 1 • PLANivin F,Fipslom MAY 1 1::. WO RECEIVED ._ °Pk 7644,,,, I ar,r- I'''' ' # 4{-45-71 ./1679-71et 9/ ,g24tzyl I-, 117 1 lY r--- 1 CIA-°-et-- 414/142-- Ct/L-12_ 6,62(1_1 1 -, Al 4 ri- .4.1r sa .. . Ai/41411 ;i frta To -,-. ) (714(U) 97)&gebpvi,,_ ,c--„„c,cf NT. _a25 61/40 ,.. . PLANNING DIVISION — — - - - — CITY OFRENTON �'✓t i C 7 ide -- — - MAY 14, 1990 333 ti1ae.e -/-/a4see 640 _ . L1ra;k.- Mar,/ —L7442 Ye; „or yr_vi: 6M t�k (?.t?6.1.4. 4., 2:cc flre.4,10x R241 1►, Li A goys- - uevl 144,4. _ _ _ „Lk _eyafiA2 J ✓ 1 l-/-44/ ziG2t /0/14-11 L ,( /UI21(G✓ S 1,LIe.�liu! /lG c'r'tSpG - j G tC. fC i kre'1 -16'i v24 � , k GLvt2A 'J4e'1,2�'1 �G�,` ' j rl ii� e t y 1.'z-.c I/Ks - a_412 4}3 fro 1-4 Gig 1,6-v\ rk! `c i ti,G� -� tac.w a`�1_�w4C y na �'G-wg� --I W t 6 '1:1✓\3 - (_ o h�L.- - L;i 1.000 t/{' �Jl�-e �llp ,' i {4"'t.(6. C?. 6./ i'l�t.G L -� __j_ x✓L� y�ki)-( t G -�.2. . GLi,t , D- l - Gi4-0 A44,-* ke' -, , ,,►•w,�Z I z, FR - cchrife � Y ^ ^ | ' ., � ` N / ' '--- '---- - ------- - ------- --- - ---- ----r ---- --------------------- --------------------------- � . -' 7 ----'- --� --------------------- ---�----------�---------------- ' -- -----l��� IJ, iV - ........r.r, F:.1 ,r`, ,...".,,":".., _,,,, ,,:";,:,,......,: ;„ .-.:•, :t :-"•t,:" .:-:„.,‘, : ••"..t",t,r,,,•:• ,,,, ,,,,, . . .. :„,. .„.t.., ,t.,..t.,,•:::::.,. :"-",. ,...."„rt,.............i." ,,,,,,..,,,,,y-,- -•: , .7).../.. „ . ..,, , ......,i-,n . Y . f 4441,�1, - (4 - ,,,..„„.„,•:.:_ ... .,.....;.:•,...,,,,....1:::•..„,„‘„:.:T• ,,....:t,,,,,1,:.:t,:„.,.:,,.. . ,•:•,.,-..,."::,,,;,-". ",",_-....... ,.,.... ,__ _....-. ,,, i ,..." ,, ..f.•. ,,, ,,,•:,"- "... • ...,:".... -,• -:: , ,,,,,,, t-t,"„,„,,.. : . ,,:•.•,:„.,,,77. ..ri .....•:....r.,t,,,..:,..: ,-•,-':,,•,•"--",.".,..?"•-•,-,-- ,,,,, ,,,,,,.".•,,... :.:.,:. "... .t,7.--",. ::•. „.„...:•.;:..-,..,-,2::.,,. .„ .",-...,:;..,•",,..,....,,,••,:..,.;..,"."•.t...,,.-:".•: ::.:.::........-%•."..:",-,!:,:.. ..,"-:":,:;:.:,...;.,.....:.,".:"::,,-. 1,1;74 n , .. ,� ,;����;:�:� ice: _. �/A� • •I .. pppp�-.p;'pry�,yp•'� - - _ -Y. ( Tp , �' „1 J 1 I . NZ ;/�131(..d" , � �,, 'NL k InJel.JNil a I/!,/-..,JJ,/,' t'j' ' R i ram, ., �4� "i k .,.,., ., • ,:,.t•....,,..,...-,.:,.:,.,,___.„ .,„„.. ,. .:s. : „.,•::....-,.....,-...- -,-,, ,i.:.,,•-?,-,,...,;::.;(:;,:,, i.,..?,..,.i.:.,,,,,,:•,„_,,,,,..,...,-,,, -;.-,! _:,...:,,,,::•._-,........,...,.,,,.. . +r,` T;f'ie ...:-,,.,-.;,..... ' ,�f , S• LLy, Yti �,l r.I 6^ t ,,,,,,-,::],,.., y,...)::.,.,:_.:i.T.,.,-,,,.,:.....i.,,i.:,..,.,_,..,.._. ..„.,:::,:„.,,..,„._,!,.,..,,,-;.7.,,,,.,;..:..,,,..;:.::::,:,.. . •. r. I - ...i.;_.:., „.._ ,,,:..,:.;,.....,..,„,,::::,..„,:f.„:„..,....•,...,.. .,,,,,: w f I _ - ' efi: I I'Y, '. "'t , om Y'.. . ,r ;f ,4. o — 4 t, ,)t y •i T,' P 1' - } e. Yr t •I "• a -li 4110 .:�' rrt - ,r r 7.. :iit.A.A...." �1: .• Pr� . , ':�: et, ' ht T: r 1 , ` /+., f I` ,z.. I- , • d t-, L i I1 • � � Jr"` t It�. f � 1 V �.4, r-+ •i� tet.A._ b.+ 7P w .l, r`=4--- d,\.e i- F F. :i..".c,..";:..,'t.;•';,.'';:,T.'''',::-i'.' . ','. .' L-'.1.L..'..':.''' .'...tii,',.-iid,7: .',,..'-,,'...„,'",'.,f,„:„,:,:.,...,,, I,yF� . ;N ,,,,-....,,,,,i.,..-,,,,,..,.:,:.,..,,,- 70';,-::', f - I- .1. r" S r1 ^ . r• , *J' nY ' , •si .is , - r. �. "'C _ ;it�1 . 4- _ • I - N'� L`1', • S, _„,.,..,.‘,....,_ . , • • -----,1---7-----„,_ , VT. &Mrs. C.R J i --0v E , 0,_t_, 102.34 Marine View Di W i,> y , • Seattk, WA 98146 p5 4 4,-,' ,--`1 lu) : 4 MAY /0 I-, `Dtit41 it a 4,./4)-kit 61,0126-1-4-11-4-6.1114444;—) Z.0i t) WI I i 141)4 6v --- fps PLANNING DIVISION CITY oF PEN TON MAY 15799Q May 12, 1990 Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner Dept . of Community Development 200 Mill Ave . S . Renton, WA . 98055 • Dear Mary Lynne Myer, • Any development of buildings and parking areas in the south side of the Blackriver Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery will disturb wildlife and probably cause species extinctions . Thanks to the actions of selfish and greedy people (people who should be deeply ashamed) , this very special natural area could be added to the growing list of destroyed wildlands . • Please do not allow this development . Sine re y • Janice Martin 133 A 30th Ave . Seattle , WA 98133 328 3164 • • • • LAM ao 4d, Ifs • 7/ n. 35 tt-r • � Cv�f-9����3 �'— //—`T D )14rLd _ PLANNING DIVISION -- CITY Or RENTO{tl . --- © ti Th-t MAY 1 4 1990 (,t'71. T2o5-5-7- - - - RECEIVE* - -- 7 .- 7t -- ----------- - -- ------ ----- ---- x212.€4,L,0L-- Ta,d-. ----------- --- --- -- -------- - P-0-eL-ZtAy 17-4 6r-24 - I; • „ •••., - . -1047/-9 P‘ebi " (-07 1 L cr-C c-L ((i) cc G23 /5w7 r". - -IrrI1r11— P7grrtrrY'49)) er7777, rY,IA V,11 • 1,, PLANNING DIVISION cu Y OF RENTON MAY 1 4 /990 May 11, 1990 ii ` C IIVE D Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Ms. Myer: I 'm writing to protest the proposed development of the Blackriver Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery as discussed in the Environmental Impact Statement released on April 11. Human encroachment on the heron rookery will have a devastating effect on their nesting, raising of young and overall health. There are over 24 nesting pairs of herons at this sight--they will undoubtedly leave when confronted with the noise, light, movement and diminished air quality that comes with a large concentration of people. The siting of buildings within 400 feet of the birds is absolutely unacceptable. Herons are extremely skittish--which is why this is one of the only rookeries left in the Kent Valley. Please don' t let this one disappear. In addition, paving the area will eliminate habitat for other wildlife. Other species will probably move on to try and find the dwindling open space and green areas they can live in. This is an area that already supports a thriving ecosystem. Please mitigate the existing development plan to allow for wildlife. Sincerely, Marcy Be r CJ`34 3213 Conkling Place West Seattle, WA 98119 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAY 1 4 1990 RECE WED 19 it-0 ,Ae‘lee67z, 972 /1%469Z, R57:1 - 36/3 4 -400 5-A1/4.0 ~ _ PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAY 1 4 1990 May 11, 1990 Dear Ms. Myer, E..r6Y ED I am writing in response to the Environmental Impact Statement, of April 11,regarding the Blackriver Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery. First,I want to tell you that this was a tough letter to write. Not because I didn't know what I wanted to say. But,because I wasn't sure what it was acceptable to say. So,I decided to say what I feel and hope for the best. (I think it is important to mention that. I spent a lot of time trying to compose the"right"sort of letter. I would imagine that some people got frustrated and gave up). I am very concerned about the impact of proposed building near the rookery. As a matter of fact,I am very concerned about building and growth throughout the entire state of Washington. I am a native Washingtonian. Over the 36 years of my life I have seen the state population grow and I have seen the impact on both the environment and the quality of life. I have always spent a lot of time camping and hiking here. Even as a child, I was impressed by the purity of our waters,the beauty of our countryside,and the abundance of wildlife. I don't want to see that destroyed. Not only for my sake and the sake of future generations. But,also for the sake of the planet! As higher intelligence beings,it is our responsibility to protect our planet and it's other life forms. We have already done a great deal of harm. It isn't going to be easy to repair the damage; some of it can't be repaired. We need to change now. We need policies and regulations to preserve what still exists today. We can not bring life back from extinction! I am not a scientist. But,studies indicate that, should the proposed building occur,the herons will abandon the rookery. This rookery has grown considerably over the last few years. Since,we do not have an over abundance of herons in Washington this may be an indication that the herons have settled here due to a loss of former habitats. Are we trying to run these beautiful birds out of the state? Do we want to eliminate the species?!? I know that isn't true for all of us. My primary concerns about this site are: proposed locations of buildings and parking areas are to close to the rookery. Without adequate distance and buffering,the herons and other wildlife will be disturbed by movement,light noise,air quality and glare. (These are shy, timid animals. If they feel threatened they will not breed comfortably and they will probably be forced out entirely). In addition,paving the area will eliminate habitat. Which could result in local extinctions of other wildlife,too. Please,do anything you can to save the natural wonders of our state. • c anks, Rhonda E. Chapman , jxfd s//V/fa 4-6 a En98056 17 ') • _s "ce OD '`� 11 MAY -."_ _ -- ? —a . 5 i' • M 01Z(-1 L'y Nr I' if_.> OA N . N I 0 R. kit(Z,O N AI V.A .S 'FA- R—A-i►'iJ `Du-r-. 0p Co Pn m(Aid(raj -"DE-U ,PI'm E•/0--r— C� M I L 1. t�CV�N Z-��. o.-�-�` \ • f4Q-1-01\-s ) wk . 9gO �S j , • . 1 , • - PLANNING DIVISION �a1� , . -, , CITY-OF RENTON • . . '. - ,S'''43 I/., £-�, 1-1 , PLaA -. ' ,.: IViAY 1 4 �990 , ' . • 'r--0-7-,-3,-). . C.,....:,,,,, . 1.2,,,.....,,4„. , /1(L.„, ' 77-- .... r',Ia. . ; iieCE V D . - -611611 Ale t 4 4.& .{-4_:-•ee.'„, :/vd,,,.., '., ,A4,-/-,--4- -&?-c:I/-e:J .CGS `, * �5`1,, 1-P,/C/-(44-e-4-ci ta✓tJC eY e'-ivol !Y/2 2is✓ ,. ,C---G.e--c/�¢i 'l P/1rIA --r,�t'�, !/��w Gi✓ ,Ct''' 4,- ey 1..,_,_6(' ' ' ' '' /_,,--:-• ' ' tg-' ' ' ' ___g:7_,_,- --(LLt--,, , ..,,i.,;,_€,,,e,__ N . . . . ,, . _,4/--/,..„.,-,/..: (,.--‘ ,t-y- ' , . Q..79--H,-,,L,...-e. . v -;-:,--c-,--e. . -r-e---- - ---7--- • .7.7.'-ii,-.,C---/2/./i-:-:EL7 ,--i FA-e-10---,--42-,--"747 . k ' --' e jt,, •. ,e_...,)...:,-...c.,-,i4:-47.0_,,,,-4;6"...„_&71.1.6, i ., c:€;....„.„..€47 , , Liles _ U1 l , ... ' , _, ,,. .•.' -' /0 I•, '''''';W C. . , 4t44,C, ' "r' '''.--, ' • . 75x£c 1".Lci - .•'67 r y/y 0 0 • • . . I. . ' i • • . _ - . - - - _ - - , / ' / I- - - " i ' - - , _. - - , - - r , \ , ` i• / - - - • . ` r - • _ ` ; / , + - - -. r S ` ' ` _ J ' - . - - -11111.6 May 10 , 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY v OF RENTON Mary Lynne Myer 1441 4 )99® Senior Environmental Planner Department of Community Development RCEIIV ® 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Ms . Myer: We are writing to express our shock over the proposed development near the Renton Heron Rookery and Blackriver Riparian Forest . This area is very unique and a real treasure to Renton and the county. A rookery of this size is rare. To place office buildings near it is a crime. The office buildings can still exist but an adequate buffer area around the rookery is essential. Without a decent buffer zone, the herons will leave. So many people , including present occupants of the nearby office buildings , enjoy the beauty of this special area. Once destroyed, these areas are gone forever. • Please reconsider this proposed development . Pegg Dunl p ��Gti T omas/ Make - 15639 16th venue S.W. Seattle , WA 98166 243-7226 Pi rd 450;i90 JT 111111. May 10, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION Mary Lynne Myer CITY OF RENTON Senior Environmental Planner Department of Community Development MAY 6 4 1990 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RECEIVED Dear Mary Lynne Myer: I am writing in opposition to the proposed development of the south side of the Blackriver Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery. As the population of King county increases, we are losing more and more open spaces, which translates into wildlife habitat loss. A large part of the reason people are moving here is the quality of life. Ironically the quality of life is decreasing as our wildlife habitats are destroyed. The Blackriver Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery is particularly precious because it is located in an oasis of industrial and commercial complexes. The herons and other wildlife located there have been squeezed into this or dislodged from their normal habitats by development pressures throughout the King county. The proposed development would likely destroy this area as a wildlife sanctuary and breeding area. It truly saddens me to watch the constant destruction of our open spaces. I have lived in Western Washington all my life and have watched the development roll over a lot of open spaces I hiked, played and bird watched in. The pace at which we are moving right now is astounding. If we do not preserve some of these areas now, there will soon be none left to preserve. By allowing the office buildings to be built as proposed, the heron rookery will likely be abandoned. The buildings and parking areas are simply too close to the nesting area. The herons, as well as other wildlife, require a buffer which would shelter them from movement, glare, noise and air pollution. The proposed development would violate. all of these. I strongly urge you to protect this area as a wildlife habitat and not allow the adjacent development to destroy it. Thank-you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Terry L. Lingbloom 7058 7th Avenue N.W. Seattle, WA 98117 / Aga/ c/y/ > _ , ,/ 7 / - PLANNING DIVISION '��? "G-C3 CITY®FPENiOI'a / ; .- xizetu mt_ t,t MAY 1 1 1990 )277 /c; /9 ii_ rt-y-2-,- RECOVED 41-----/wn-v 7-)-z-- i.v-e;EA- vto //Y-tA,--i2-0/-;1 c-ar ,-2,, J-eir, -- 6L-i-k_ -jr/6-0,frp,i b-,:-: ,t- -d--E7lis oL--i,ee---- --- — /-e^-} 'yr) cru2_ A--L-t- -2-4- 2.. 0-4-__ ig-i--i-i-e-14----rJ) .),1 P p g- i 0•a j 2 j 0 t-'`C-2 e 4- 2.}• '--7 .2 ‘ /L"1' f — ( s_,Zi e Y,- /A 0`'eji- 1 e/t, ra /-* 1, . ,,,,ii - ,(_, -1_0., ,_ 2 0___L,k_J /iLi -t_e--t---a- .L,----e /4-c-T7-R"-- _ill -1A•eA:ell /1 -17e;(7/cij - ' /er-,-w/ 4"/"-i-L-r . 24-1)°4-. -IC--- v YIL— CrAin. ‘ - i r;i.j,,, X)-JL-- - citk;1.-a .--Y77 0\e"2-7'11 :7- 4- (1- 411-i (A)-jo r /-r- `-i- Le - - ',L,J2 - ,,,,,,e_ 4 (•,ett-)- ,,-Ltre4ree_ . f /(_-. (,}--,-21,1/e7, 7-1,_ j,_,),I,LQ,,) - t,t)--- ,c-vi t.,1 t,e4,) ' cf-eLvet-;--)1, , z- , _ /hAlin . ate -17LL 0J-erell-- '()- -7. L6'1-)c.,,t-t--, „..,y-rert- i Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation Mayor Earl Clymer Ymer 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 May 9, 1990 Dear Mayor Clymer, This letter outlines the concerns of Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation and concerned Renton and other King County residents. Our concerns are as follows: o Ineffective current procedures for public comment, which reduces the potential for real citizen impact on the final project; o The City of Renton's willingness to accept a proposal as incomplete and inaccurate as the Blackriver Corporate Park DEIS; o The City of Renton's lack of commitment to its own Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) and Comprehensive Plan. On a positive note, I would like express my appreciation for the efforts of Don Erickson and Mary Lynne Myer (who very recently joined your staff) . They have consistently made themselves available and, during the rare times we needed them to, have gone the extra mile to research a question or locate a record that was hard to find. If not for their assistance and willingness to be available, public participation would be considerably more difficult. In addition, we would like to express our appreciation for the extension of the comment period. Unfortunately, the way this process is currently structured, the City of Renton staff must rely primarily on information furnished by the providers of information, who are paid by the developer, for a DEIS and final EIS. The City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan clearly spell out established policies and goals, which require Renton to impose mitigating conditions or deny projects that are not in keeping with established policy. Our greatest concern is that the decision to develop the site may have already been made by the City of Renton. Please note that we are sending a copy of this letter to the developer. We believe that they recognize it is in their best interest that a full citizen review of this proposal take place. 3640 Ashworth Avenue North Seattle,Washington 98103 (206) 634-0222 r� yr . /bES iz Issue 1: Ineffective current procedures for public comment reduce substantive citizen impact on the final project. The evening of May 1, the City of Renton held what many citizens viewed as an unfortunate sham of a public hearing in the Council Chambers. The presumed objective of the hearing was to provide a forum for discussion of the proposed development at Renton's Blackriver Riparian Forest and Heronry, as spelled out in a draft environmental impact statement. Nearly 50 concerned citizens filled the Council Chambers and witnessed a demonstration of apathy on the part of the City. Although Mr. Erickson and Ms. Myer were present, none of the actual decision-makers attended. If this issue is a priority in the eyes of the City of Renton, the decision-makers should have been there. Had they been, this would have provided them an ideal opportunity, in the context of a public proceeding, to ask us questions about issues brought out during or after the testimony that needed clarification or elaboration. Additionally, it would have provided us an opportunity to ask questions of them. We should have had that opportunity. Representatives of the developer, First City Developments, attended and were available to answer questions. During the hearing, each person was limited to five minutes of testimony. Let's be fair to both sides here. The DEIS took over a year to develop, write, and finalize for release. The 1" thick document is highly technical. To be allotted only five minutes to testify does not allow citizens, especially those of us with expertise, to even begin to adequately describe our concerns. The five minute rule should be increased to a minimum of 15 minutes (or more, as appropriate) to allow for situations such as these. We realize that additional opportunity is available to comment. We will be submitting detailed written comments to the City. But one of the purposes of the hearing, as stated by Mary Lynne Myer, was to provide people in the audience with an opportunity to learn from the testimony of other citizens present more about the proposed development, and use that testimony in their written comments. We also realize that the hearing was taped and that the testimony will be transcribed for the record. But personal contact is essential. Reducing our oral testimony to yet more text on paper ultimately degrades its value to the realm of just more paperwork. The five minute limit and apparent lack of interest on the part of the decision makers was inexcusable. We were left with the". distinct, and hopefully erroneous, feeling that the City was simply providing lip service to enforcement of environmental -2- is policy. Public comment seems to be sought only to satisfy technical procedural requirements of local and state environmental regulations. Issue 2: The City of Renton's willingness to accept a proposal as incomplete and inaccurate as this DEIS. One of our central concerns with the DEIS is that the document contains not only errors in fact, but also errors of omission (see Attachment B, the comments of Range Bayer, and Attachment C, the comments of John Kelsall) . By accepting an inaccurate and, especially, incomplete DEIS, the City imposes a great and unacceptable burden of effort on those who are least able to identify the omissions. The 30-45-day comment period and our limited resources do not allow us to adequately address the omissions. This is, after all, what the City, the developer, and the preparer of the DEIS are paid and equipped to do. The way this process is currently administered suggests that it is effectively controlled by developers. The City should act as a greater authority whose responsibility it is to ensure that development occurs only if it is consistent with established policies. The decision to develop could easily be railroaded through with little regard for the inadequacies in the DEIS and public concern. Even if by some miracle we discovered all of the omissions, they would not be addressed until the final EIS. That provides us even less opportunity to comment and impact the final decision. In addition, the limited mitigation measures that are offered are often couched in "shoulds" and "mays, " rendering the document toothless in terms of what it actually promises to deliver. Issue 3: The City of Renton's lack of commitment to its own Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) and Comprehensive Plan. We, the citizens of Renton and employees working in Renton, sincerely care about the quality of our environment and the long- term interests of the community, and the City's concern and caring is explicitly spelled out in Renton's policies (see Attachment A) to protect Renton's quality of life. According to the DEIS, the proposed Blackriver Corporate Park development will have a significant adverse impact on the environment that cannot be mitigated. Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the policies it incorporates authorizes and requires the City to impose conditions to mitigate adverse impacts, and where those adverse impacts cannot be mitigated, to deny the project. Gerry Adams, in his testimony at the hearing, specifically. references some of those policies. We will be submitting separate written comments to the City, as part of the DEIS review process, confirming those deficiencies touched upon during our brief testimony and addressing other deficiencies as well. Because the proposed mitigation measures are based on erroneous information, glossed over, or completely omitted from the DEIS, we respectfully request that the DEIS be withdrawn and revised. Alternatively, the City should develop a supplemental DEIS, which thoroughly addresses omissions in this DEIS. Conclusion: This issue merits your attention and action. Our efforts stem from a genuine desire to preserve a special and extremely fragile quality of life that still exists here in Renton. Qualities such as these have been lost in other areas in Puget Sound. Responsible resolution of this issue, in compliance with local and state policies, will preserve this unique community resource that all too easily can be destroyed. We respectfully request your response and solution to this urgent matter. Thank you. Sincerely, Susan Krom Director cc: Nancy Matthews, Council president, Renton City Council City of Renton Planning Division Don Erickson/Mary Lynne Myer, City of Renton Current Planning Division Mark Miller, First City Developments Corporation Donald Norman May 9, 1990 4420 Larchwood Ave. Philadelphia, PA 19104 Mary Lynne Myer PLANNING DIVISION Senior Environmental Planner PLANNING CITY OF RDVISI NTON Department of Community Development City of Renton SAY 1 4 200 Mill Avenue South 1990 Renton, WA 98055 RECEIVED Dear Ms. Myer; I was contacted by Susan Krom of the Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation to comment on the Blackriver Corporate Park DEIS. I first visited the site in March of 1989 to discuss the great blue heron colony there to a group of 50 Seattle Audubon Society members, many of them Renton residents. I am familiar with the area having done research at the Renton Sewage Treatment Plant when I lived in Seattle. The heron colony has grown over the last five years, indicating its potential as a successful colony. It is certainly a wildlife spectacle for an urban area, and deserves a plan for long-term preservation. I am pleased with the dedication of the authors of the DEIS for their sensitive review of the impact of major construction near the heron colony. The use of Northwest native species plantings as habitat mitigation will improve wildlife habitat over the existing spoil areas, and has the benefit of low cost maintenance. While there will be differences of opinion over the possible effects of the proposed construction on the future of the colony, I believe all parties share a concern for the future of these magnificent birds. We are lucky that herons are adaptable birds, and the chances are good that the birds will not desert the site. Much more information on herons in Puget Sound is needed. Careful scientific documentation of the consequences of this project will provide a better understanding of the dynamics of planning our lives in better harmony with nature. Let us not turn our backs once the solution is decided. v tc0 Sh 14; c Letter to M. L. Myer May 9, 1990 I have based my comments on several years of field research investigating the impacts of pollutants on herons. This was the subject of my Master's Thesis research at Western Washington University. I cannot stress strongly enough that the real issue here is planning how to manage sites such as the Blackriver for the long-term survival of wildlife. Herons need trees, large old trees, which means that those big cottonwood nesting trees have to be protected, kept alive, and nearby trees groomed for future duty as nurseries. The proposed planting of buffers, and other mediation efforts should be set up for the long-term, not to satisfy the short term SEPA guidelines and the current conscience of concerned citizens. I have proposed that a trust be set up. The city of Renton, local conservation groups, the Washington Department of Wildlife, and the surrounding land owners would provide funding for educational aspects such as viewing areas, protection such as fences, and tree evaluation. Only with such long-term commitments can I see a future for wildlife anywhere. Herons are indicators of the health of our environment, and having a colony in an urban area for monitoring is an additional reason for preserving the colony. I am sorry I am too far away to actively participate in this project, but I remain interested in the outcome. nc rely/ / n�°yl Donal. Norman cc: Susan Krom Kelly McAllister, WDW Seattle Audubon Society Written Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for The Blackriver Corporate Park Tracts A and B Office Building by Donald Norman 4420 Larchwood Ave. Philadelphia, PA 19104 May 9, 1990. Presented to: Environmental Review Committee Department of Community Development City of Renton 200 Mill South Avenue Renton, WA 98055 Summary of Comments on the Impacts of Construction Upon the Great Blue Heron Colony in Renton, WA 1. No construction should be allowed within 660 feet of the heron colony. 2. No information was presented in the DEIS on how disturbance levels will be measured. No information on what methods will be used to evaluate the effects of Phase One construction in Tract B upon the heron colony were discussed. 3. Any construction should be halted on January 15th not February 1st. 4. A committee should be established to evaluate the outcome of any construction and evaluate the efficacy of buffer revegetation. This committee should have funds in trust, provided by the builder, the city, local environmental groups and other land owners to provide long-term monitoring of the project's outcome. • 8Iackriver Corp.Park DEIS',urnments-2- D.M.Norman 5-9-90 Introduction I have limited my comments on the proposed office building development at the Black River site in Renton, WA to the impacts on the great blue heron colony there. I was contacted by Susan Krom of the Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation to comment on the Blackriver Corporate Park DEIS. I am quite familiar with the site having visited it several times during my master's thesis research on great blue herons at Huxley College of Environmental Studies at Western Washington University in Bellingham. I am now a predoctoral candidate at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. I have enclosed a summary of my research activities to establish myself as a knowledgeable biologist on the subject of great blue heron biology. Disturbance As a biologist who has studied great blue herons, it is my opinion that a 7 story building built as close as 400 feet from an active heron colony should not be allowed. A 660 ft. guideline recommended by the Washington Department of Wildlife was not followed, though a great deal of information in the literature suggests that this distance may not be far enough. As documented in the DEIS, herons do live close to human structures. In some instances these distances are less than 660 feet, but the herons have moved into areas after the construction. The typical reason for this behavior is the lack of alternative nesting sites. Herons acclimate to the narrow noise and visual buffers because of a lack of disturbance. This prevent usually prevent abandonment. No information on what methods will be used to evaluate the effects of Phase One construction in Tract B upon the heron colony. The presence of herons in the area, or birds attempting to breed does not mean that there has not been any disturbance. Only by the measurement of breeding success can the evaluation of the colony be established. No measurements of the breeding success of the colony were given, especially during the spring disturbance of forest clearing within 200 feet of the colony in 1987, and during the 1984 pond construction. No data on the relationship between disturbance and breeding success were presented for other heron colonies sited in the DEIS. Noise at the Black River site was used as a measure of disturbance, yet it is well known that herons may habituate to noises that obviously do not threaten them. No studies, however, have been done to examine the reproductive success of colonies Elackriver Corp.Park DEIS comments-3- D.M.Norman 5-9-90 exposed to excessive noise. I have studied the heron colony at Ault Naval Air Station on Widbey Island that is less than 500 yards from the landing strip for Navy jet bombers, and found that breeding success was comparable to nearby colonies. Anyone familiar with that area knows the noise level is excessive. Without records of the breeding success of the Black River colony, it is impossible to obtain an idea of the possible effects of construction disturbance. I have compiled the breeding success data from the 1984 study funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and from my thesis research into a summary table (Table 1)(Calambokidis et al. 1985). The data from the Auburn colony in Peasley Canyon is also available for 1984, in which 4 of 10 nests were successful, and averaged 2.9 young/ per nest. Typically, almost 90% of nests are successful for this subspecies (Butler 1989), and it is estimated that a reproductive rate of about 2.4 young/successful nest is necessary to maintain the population (Forbes et al. 1985). From these calculations, it is obvious that many colonies in Puget Sound are not replacing their own numbers. The colony may appear to stay the same, but this is due to the influx of new birds. Without measuring the reproductive success of the colony in question, and also noting the numbers of first year birds, it is impossible, without banding, to know whether the colony has been disturbed or impacted. Measurement of Disturbance I propose that any heron colony with less than 50% of the attempted nests being successful, and with a reproductive rate of less than 2 birds per successful nest is defined as being adversely impacted. Sources of the lowered reproductive success can be reduced food availability, poor weather, predation, pollution, and disturbance. No research on the primary food source of the Black River colony has been done. No research on the effects of weather on heron colony breeding success has been done, and the microclimates of the Pacific Northwest would make this quite difficult to generalize. The resurgence of populations of Bald Eagles puts many heron colonies in danger, as Bald Eagles have been documented to eat heron nestlings (Norman et al. 1989). Judging the impacts of toxic chemicals upon herons is difficult. Despite a decrease in available habitat, heron numbers appear to have increased in the past 20 years, perhaps when effects of pollutants were greater. Herons continue to show eggshell thinning from DDE, though DDT was banned almost 20 years ago, and the effects of dioxins on herons is a major research effort in Canada (Elliott et al. 1989). In 0 Blackriver Corp.Park DEIS Comments-4- D.M.Norman 5-9-90 the region, herons appear to have recovered from past reproductive problems, though local effects of pollutants at places such as Commencement Bay may be exerting some effects. If weather has been followed and determined not to be a factor, and food abundance is measured under the colony and found equal to previous years, disturbance could be presumed to be a major cause of nesting failure. Necropsies of chicks found under the colony can be performed to distinguish between starved, poisoned, and healthy chicks (Langelier 1989, unpublished thesis research D. M. Norman). This information could have been obtained on several visits over the period of study this colony has undergone for the preparation of this DEIS. Counting the number of chicks in the successful nests was an essential aspect of evaluating this colony that was not performed. A registered wildlife veterinarian was available at the Institute of Wildlife Toxicology at Western Washington University during the preparation phases of this report, and Ken Langelier, a DVM on Vancouver Island has performed necropsies on many herons to consult with other vets. This extent of evaluation in the preparation of a DEIS, unfortunately, has not been a requirement by the state of Washington. Periods of No Distubance At Heron Colonies The arrival of herons and commencement of prenuptual activities at the Black River heron colony may occur prior to February 1st. Other colonies, such as the Dumas Bay colony in nearby Federal Way show activity as early as mid-January. The period before nesting is much more critical to prevent abandonment than the periods later in the breeding season. It is better to resume construction activities earlier in the summer than to allow heavy construction until February 1st when herons are present at their colony. I propose that any construction should be halted on January 15th, not February 1st. Flight Zones No data was presented for the flight zones presented in Figure 4 of Appendix B of the DEIS. Unless these drawings are the proposed unobstructed paths available to the herons after construction, their relevance is minimal. The directions herons fly when approaching the colony within 1000 feet of the colony is variable, even when birds are returning from the same feeding location. • Blackriver Corp.Park DEIS Comments-5- D.M.Norman 5-9-90 Remedial Action at the Site No information was presented in the DEIS that indicated the duration of long- term commitment to maintaining the vegetated no-build buffer. I recommend that cottonwood and red alder be planted as they are the fastest growing trees. They are also less expensive than the large evergreens necessary to provide a buffer zone. Though they are not as complete a buffer as evergreens, they will be larger, and will protect the integrity of the colony trees. Additional cottonwoods and alders should be planted around the colony to increase the size of the wooded area. This will certainly allow the future survival of the colony after the current cottonwoods are destroyed by the birds. I am currently involved in documenting the rate of deterioration and death of cottonwoods and alders in heron colonies. No allocation of funds or method of evaluating the effectiveness of the remediation/enhancement of the site was presented. I commend the planners of the vegetation enhancement for their selection of hardy native species. A Monitoring Committee for the Black River Heron Colony I propose that a committee be established to monitor the outcomes of the project, with funding to maintain the colony and provide environmental educational opportunities for the people of Renton to learn more about their heron colony. This committee shall be composed of representatives from the city of Renton, the property owners, the Washington Department of Wildlife, a scientific review committee, and local environmental groups. It is desired that funds from all of these groups can be set into a trust for their use in maintaining this area. Projects include the yearly evaluation and care of trees in the colony area, and construction of the appropriate viewing areas with good signs. If fencing is necessary, it can be funded through this committee. Local environmental groups and the Department of Wildlife can offer field trips to local persons. I recommend that any committee established to evaluate the impacts of distubance upon herons include Dr. John Kelsall, retired Canadian Wildlife Service biologist, or Rob Butler, a biologist with the Canadian Wildlife Service, both of which live just north of the border in British Columbia. Dr. Kelsall has been involved in evaluating the impact of human activities upon herons in the Pacific Northwest, and Rob Butler is currently completing his PhD at the University of British Columbia on the • • Blackriver Corp.Park DEIS Comments-6- D.M.Norman 5-9-90 breeding biology of great blue herons. Because the subspecies of great blue heron that occurs in this area ranges from Puget Sound up to Alaska, there is great interest on the part of Canadians to impove the level of research on herons in Washington. Over half of the estimated population of the subspecies occur in Washington state, and movements across the border are common. Other than my research, the only other project that has attempted to evaluate the biology of great blue herons in western Washington was the 1984 NOAA survey. This project was funded to evaluate the effects of pollution upon herons. A previous report by NOAA had reported high levels of toxic chemicals in herons from Seattle, the Pigeon Point Colony, and from Tacoma, the Dumas Bay colony (Riley et al. 1983). Major research, on the other hand, is ongoing in British Columbia. Another heron expert, Range Bayer, lives in Newport, Oregon, might be available to evaluate impacts of this project. Michael Brandman Associates, a consulting firm near Los Angeles, has expertise in the evaluation of impacts of construction on heron colonies. At least one expert from outside the area should be on the committee. This will allow an impartial voice on the committee, and provide contacts to other parts of the country. Summary Questions about the survival of herons at small urban colonies versus the three large colonies north of Puget Sound (Samish Island, Birch Bay, and Point Roberts) remain as an important research issues. Research needs to be undertaken to determine the stability of these urban colonies. As western Washington continues to grow, the quality of life we cherish will hopefully not be measured by the miles of freeway, but by the numbers of heron colonies. The Renton colony, along with the other urban colonies, can provide important information on the levels of environmental contaminants to which we are also exposed. Efforts to require several years of background monitoring of heron colonies within 1000 feet of proposed projects should be undertaken under wildlife protection legislation. Further research may allow even better methods to estimate the bounds of disturbance. • Blackriver Corp.Park DEIS Comments-7- D.M.Norman 5-9-90 Literature Cited Butler, R. W. 1989. Breeding and ecology and population trends of the great blue heron (Ardea herodians fannini) in the strait of Georgia. pp 112-117. In: The Ecology and status of marine and shoreline birds in the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia. Spec Publ. Can. Wildl. Serv., Ottawa. Calambokidis, J., S. Speich, J. Peard, G. H. Steiger, J. C. Cubbage, D. M. Frye, and L. J. Lowenstine. 1985. Biology of Puget Sound marine mammals and marine birds: Population health and evidence of pollution effects. NOAA Technical Memorandum. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Rockville, Md. 159 pp. Elliott, J. E., R. W. Butler, R. J. Norstrom, and P. E. Whitehead. 1988. Levels of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans in eggs of great blue herons (Ardea herodias) in British Columbia, 1983-1987: possible impacts on reproductive success. Canadian Wildlife Service Progress Note No. 176. 7 pp. Forbes, L. S., K. Simpson, J. P. Kelsall, and D. R. Flook. 1985. Reproductive success of great blue herons in British Columbia. Can. J. Zool. 63: 1110-1113. Langelier, K. 1989. Post mortem examination of 43 great blue heron nestlings in 1988. Wildl.Vet. Report 2(1): 17. Norman, D. M., I. Moul, and A. Breault. 1989. Bald eagle instrusions in great blue heron colonies. Colonial Waterbirds 12: 215-217 Riley, R. G., E. A. Crecelius, R. E. Fitzner, B. L. Thomas, J. M. Gurtisen, and N. S. Bloom. 1983. Organic and inorganic toxicants in sediment and marine birds from Puget Sound. NOAA Technical Series Memorandum NOS OMS 1. National Ocean Service, NOAA. 125 pp. Great Blue Heron Activities Donald Norman May 1990 Dept. of Biology-Leidy Labs University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104-6018 Professional Activities Heron Related Publications Norman, D. M. (In Preparation). A retrospective analysis of changes in great blue heron (Ardea herodias fannini) population using Christmas Bird Counts. Norman, D. M., S. Speich, J. Calambokidis, R. J. Kendall, and L. F. Kiff. (In Preparation). Levels of eggshell thinning in great blue heron colonies in Puget Sound. Norman, D. M., G. P. Cobb, and R. J. Kendall. (In Preparation). Levels of polychlorinated biphenyl congeners and chlorinated hydrocarbons in sediment and eggs of great blue herons (Ardea herodias fannini) from Commencement and Samish Bay Washington. Norman, D. M., I. Maul, and A. Breault. 1989. Bald eagle instrusions in great blue heron colonies. Colonial Waterbirds 12: 215-217 Norman, D. M., G. Cobb, and R. J. Kendall. 1989. Use of Great Blue Heron Eggshell Chorio-Allantoin in Toxicological Research. Institute of Wildlife Toxicology, Huxley College of Environmental Studies Report. 8 pp. Norman, D. M., S. Tank, R. J. Kendall, P.T. Haug, and H. Webber. 1989. A Review of Environmental Contaminant Studies in Washington Inland Marine Waters Wildlife and Development of a Relational Computerized Database: WILDTOX with Recommendations for Future Research. Report submitted to the Office of Puget Sound, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA. 141 pp. Norman, D. 1988. Measurement of fluoride in great blue heron eggshells as an indicator of dispersal of an environmental pollutant. Huxley College of Environmental Studies, Environmental Biochemistry Report. 12 pp. Masters Thesis Topic Organochlorine Pesticides and Polychlorinated Biphenyl Congeners in Great Blue Herons from the Puget Sound Ecosystem. Huxley College of Environmental Studies, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA. Committee Chairman: Dr. Ronald J. Kendall (now Director, The Institute of Wildlife and Environmental Toxicology, P. O. Box 2278 Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29632). Heron CV D. M. Norman May 1990 2 Research Grants Norman, D. and R. J. Kendall. 1988. Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Great Blue Herons in the Puget Sound Ecosystem. Funded grant proposal submitted to the Washington State Department of Wildlife ($5,000) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ($7,000). Institute of Wildlife Toxicology, Huxley College of Environmental Studies, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA. 61 pp. Professional Presentations Non-lethal Methods of Contaminant monitoring with great blue herons. and Pollution Monitoring of Marine Wildlife in Washington State: Transboundary Research Issues. Poster session at 10th Annual SETAC Meeting , Oct.28-Nov.2, 1989, Toronto, Ontario. Great Blue Herons in Padilla Bay. Presentation and Field Trip, Annual meeting, Friends of Padilla Bay National Estuarine Reserve. Bayview, WA. May 12, 1989. Monitoring Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Great Blue Herons: Use of the Chorion- Allantoic Membrane. Presentation at the Joint Washington-Oregon Annual Wildlife Society Meeting. February 23, 1989, Hood River, OR. Pollution Monitoring in Puget Sound Utilizing Great Blue Herons. Presentation to the Public Involvement in Education program on Vashon Island,sponsored by the Puget Sound Water Quality Authority and Friends of the Vashon Library, October 26, 1988. Pollution Monitoring in Puget Sound Utilizing Great Blue Herons. Poster Session presentation at the Second Joint Meeting of the Colonial Waterbird Society and the Pacific Seabird Group. Washington, D. C. October 12-16, 1988. Pollution Monitoring in Puget Sound Utilizing Great Blue Herons. March 18, 1988. Poster Session presentation at the First Puget Sound Water Quality Authority Research Meeting. Seattle, WA. Great Blue Heron Colony Field Work 1. Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge Colony, north of Olympia, WA. Collected eggs and chicks April to May 1988. Samples analyzed by US FWS. 2. Dumas Bay Colony, Federal Way, WA. Collected eggs and chicks, April to May 1988. Samples analyzed and archived by WWU. Thesis Colony. 3. Samish Island Colony, WA. Collected eggs and chicks, April to July 1988, eggshells and Chorio-allantoin membranes (CAM), May- July 1989. Mapping 1988, 1989. Samples analyzed and archived by WWU. Thesis Colony. 4. Birch Bay State Park Colony, Whatcom County, WA. Eggshell and Chorio-allantoin membrane collection 1988, 1989. Mapping in 1988, 1989. 5. March Point Colony, Anacortes, WA. Eggshell and Chorio-allantoin membrane collection (CAM), April and May 1989. v `• • Heron CV D. M. Norman May 1990 3 Great Blue Heron Colony Field Work Cont. 6. Whidbey Island Naval Air Station Colony. Eggshells and Chorio-allantoin membranes (CAM), April and May 1989. Collection was part of a National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences project to TIWET. 7. Point Roberts, WA. Mapping 1988, 1989. 8. UBC Endowment Lands Colony, Vancouver, B. C. July 1988. Eggshell collection. 9. Crofton, British Columbia colony, June 1989. This colony is located at a pulp mill on Vancouver Is. that is being monitored for dioxin contamination. Assisted Ian Moul, 'a graduate student at University of British Columbia, in behavioral observations. 10. Washington State Dept. Wildlife, July 1989. Survey of Totten Island Colony (near Olympia, WA). Eggshell Collection. 11. Maury Is. Colony, Vashon Island, WA. 1988. Eggshell Collection. 12. Pigeon Point colony, Seattle, WA 1988. Eggshell Collection. 13. Black River colony, Renton, WA. 1989. Eggshell Collection. 14. Tulalip Indian Reservation Colony, Marysville, WA, north of Everett. Eggshell and Chorio-allantoin membrane collection 1989. Community Activities Reports Current Status of the Great Blue Heron Colony near Birch Bay State Park. August 1989. Submitted to Washington State Parks Commission. Comments submitted for Environmental Impact Statement, Gulf View Golf Course at Point Roberts. Dept. of Public Works, Division of Buildings and Code Administration, Whatcom County, Washington. April 1989. Comments submitted for Environmental Impact Statement, Blackriver Corporate Park, City of Renton, Dept. of Community Development, 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055. May 1990. Field Trips Vashon Is. High School, May 1988 (Maury Is. colony) Seattle Audubon Society, Feb. 1989 (Renton Black River colony) Presentations July 1989 Presentation to the Samish Island Community Club. Blue Heron Beach, Samish Island. March 16, 1989. Presentation to Seattle Audubon Society monthly meeting, Seattle, WA. August 11,1988. Presentation to the National Wildlife Federation Conservation Summit. Bellingham, WA. May 1988. Presentation to Vashon Island High School students. MiBNING DWISSI CITY OF r ENTDfj MAY 1 4 1990 RC°EVED 909 SW Langston Road Renton, WA 98055 Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner Department of Community Development 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA, 98055 May 9, 1990 Dear Ms . Myer, We are writing regarding possible development of the Blackriver Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery. As residents of Renton who value the natural ,wetlands we have in our city, we ask that your department take a very active role in protecting the local wildlife. Specifically, we request that 1 . Buildings and parking areas are not placed too close to the heron rookery. 2 . Provide adequate buffering so that the herons and other wildlife will not be disturbed by movement, light, noise, air- quality, and glare . - 3 . Allow little or no paving of the area . We live on the West Hill and love seeing the herons fly over our home . This issue is important to us . We hope your department understands the magnitude of the decision before them and makes every effort to protect a natural habitat that cannot be replaced. Si -derely, .� • Tom and Peggy Bishop H: 277-9790 W: 657-8523 (Tom) May 9, 1990 • John Kohlsaat 12057 SE 42nd Street PLANNING DIVISION Bellevue, WA 98006 CITY OF RENTON (206) 562-3108 Mary Lynne Myer MAY 1 4 1990 Senior Environmental Planner Department of Community Development VD 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Blackriver Corporate Park DEIS I would like to express my concern about the above Draft Environmental Impact Study because of the following reasons: • An active Great Blue heronry, the largest in the Puget Sound area, exists adjacent to the site. • The EIS states that proposed construction poses a signifcantly adverse impact on the heronry the cannot be mitigated. • The proposed building and parking lot locations are too close to the heronry and without adequate buffering, noise, glare, and reduced air quality will all threaten the herons in their mating/nesting/feeding ritu- als. • Proposed paving would reduce habitat of other local wildlife and possi- bly cause local exstinction of some species in the area. I feel that the loss of wetland and possible loss of the adjacent heronry is not out- weighed by any gains (increased revenue to the city, jobs, etc) to be derived from the proposed corporate park. Wetlands are crucial blocks in a rapidly weakening environment. This project would clearly have a significant adverse impact on the Blackriver wetland. I recommend that the proposed corporate park be denied until all possible impacts of the proposed construction are adequately mitigated and the scale of the project drastically reduced. Please keep me informed of the continued processing of this application. Sincerely, • ohn Kohlsaat • AXFd 19, 77"C CIy/fa PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON 1 1 1990 05-09-90 irAiCEWEii Mary Lynne Myer; I am writting to express my interest and concern about development near the BLACKRIVER RIPARIAN FOREST AND HERON ROOKERY. In your decision making please consider the placement of buildings and parking areas so they are not to close to the Heron Rookery. Every effort should be made to allow the Herons and other wildlife to remain undisturbed by movement, light, noise, glare, and air quality. It seems to me that good planning and decision making now..can allow this Heron rookery to continue unmolested by by. development. I believe this will add to the value of any development in this area. Thank you. Mike Shannon rii���/ */2o 19417. 208'Ave. S.E. Renton, Wa. 98058 .`LE. _-. .v._. __-= ^Natianal /�,yr s C? rG - n y:: ) V_ y, 10 M A Y r"` ,: 1 ,. 'i /gg0 &'seise 1c0� �$e_._1._- Mary Lynne Myer Senior Enviromental Planner Dept. of Community Development 200 Mil]. Ave. S. Renton, Wa. 98055 ildili!!I till! I I U h I!I!!!I!I l iiI!II UI III I Ill II PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF,RENTON Renton, Washington [VW 11 1990 May 9 , 1990 RECEIVED Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner Department of Community Development 200 Mi11 Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Blackriver Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery Dear Mary Lynne, As you already know, we all can see the "asphalt jungle, " the high rise apartments , the endless housing developments, the office buildings and land where trees no longer exist in our area. We surely do not wish to eliminate the chosen sight of the magestic herons and other habitat at the Blackriver Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery by not insisting that adequate buff- ering and trees be left for their protection and the visual pleasure of many . . . do we? Respectfully Subm' ted, M4y J R se Oliver C. Rouse 821 Edmonds Ave. NE Renton, Washington 98056 Telephone: 255-7381 19"VS .T. %,ice. �/��1/_ _ r . ,• (--i-- .. ,, Hi ':'. ;.".:'' ; , _.,_ ; , ; , 1:17. ..- r 1 .1; • • , ; I "' " ;,-) ;;;-);1 ,"'. -. •j:Jr,..I- ; _ i '. 'I, . I, I , I II\ iI \ . . I \ _ : . . . . .. . r.I j. ' _ ': . : 'I):I- :-•=', . : '; ' • i- :;. - r- 0 . ' . ) ::'v 1- , ;;.•.*, I : 1 , Z ' - , •---1 1 , ' - ',, 1 , II I, I I II, \ ,. ._..__. - _ .. __ , •I ' .1, ....- l • I I l' I i II •,, \ , , I;• • 11 1 I I I . . \ \ 74 v - i / ?(.. '>)1/214f71 57)1Art- • _ --9Le' i{ , .0--69 (2ek--(.1 n 1:1/14446. ///114. F�VTi)14 9)70 5-- -----/114p'I '0 U�Pj 1990 kb �4/0-P-1,- /177,A,/ v//�t� �Gt/,` __,,_e7"-- Xe/4-02---71- "ee-eudlie-- ,,. ..‹) ./i,c--/Z1—;c_Z-) , ,,, a-er''- -- z,_-.; ---2� ��/� �/72 0-L / iE , ,,� . G%� C� ( t /642.(7L-e,e_ do--7L-c-- - C G-1/(AVe 47- ZL-e-t-liC , a --792-DI4 1.66-etifei inFp1/7 •17/ 1,, c/15— ( VAVS 57-A7' i-Apfa)t,..5 • • . - o,k—r 7ki) ) FT1 ?42;w a522V• * gri1,2 fr: . -YorY L )0 • pawfbly1-?-p p p a -4 )0 .6)77307Y 4.ipl,G1)9• . )214 1-1)91 0 QJ n'S ("am aAvq, T •c0-0-p1Y)(.? /v20/ 4.vw .p7iz ,9 pi! of MA,114.1.11•V ( 14 POI f pot oppvL7 '6-0)?,51.: 7-3—iengp1 rro-17 ! AP71‘) ,y2m2 d57o X-prgirg ')vgivgitow X9 pi/I nis?1,2 lli(-7 a).) P1!P9 _Jo ip D4Ve-y .?114-7,71,1 )2 -4-11,)P4O1J Lig/xi -7v:r . d917 °al di.)3 s_lor e4y,pp.( fo Jo vaylid,)-7,------)1R----m4.----m7a2-&-ro77---h-14,/ —4711- t—v2/gli 1W77m7gWr'W7PI1 ? e?2 5 1,741")05 "A/4. 4-0• 9-W-V0p3I-P17 [1,111191,04.tM1 417,0 tip 4224 s 7cIwt7 4--paw-uuF1 envoi0 vi • • _ipao --- o-rb -1//1 • • ww low 007. '0!Go- -171A-W-70E-47 JN. • 17 7 . crwaos8 I cfb Jr{-P-v 066L1 1, NW • try,7 la 4'./ A-112 • NO-INDA-40 id10 - Pnfr22/4 0) • NOISING ONINNIcI. • - 7 ---, ,,,---,------.> ,,,-..( -,:t----, z•',„ " - .Eve 1). G s ,i- • --,7 „..----------,----.-_-_— _ 4.7r" ' 21422 29th Ave. So. , v. m - to Seattle, WA 98198 • r`C)—io.Pi Aof". --z--_-__ ----„,,..,_-- 7)/' ..._ e .1 .. 9 y • • , • . A . . : •.t cir • 1. • I 7 - Vara 71teiti•-- kfritt CA' Sept 1 Gfr7i lu /RIO t/ l U/s tde ./rti at/ �1144 a 4 • kZ '1t rn 7.w PLANNING DIVISION , qtrp &(iaht-, i. q8o S� I CT OF RE�J i"t1i� 4 1, 1got D MAY 1 1 1990 hh__ -- _ 'RECEIVED b2ittatimi an - .c, 2 etwehenti.x2 4,11-e‘t bezdhuAi attelA,(,0 'Via duaAt:dpr Qix.i- hie t,or1 400..u7 . 7 a:c.4Pdop4 u yao c,r`c a a. - 4- . (.4. ton un t ced 11114a4iLe. 1 7rikt. prodecr a�v�,s(- it.c. ��¢,� �r7"Q a- . ax,,t -pot-4/7 (05 a tL 7tL /tA , - ,a4,L L a, fr t &&' r2.01;t leira?Ut t/P1 Atti,e4-fe- v-J.crrt.Z.cadi .at4A.T.60LA, -7- } •)' PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON /DB S 1 30' MAY 1 1 1990 . �e� (� , 1,04 . q 7 P RECEIVE® ka zd_ � r q 9v • i a.rL Huff. 5J2Arvt(y( Oi (71)f Q -P anhe( o217U E�1�1` -M-e n Lu2- j pug Wa, Des (,t rn CirnCrW Y\-eA Ct u. �1' y 1, tTnS kIn S 1 4-LA se,‘ves ay\ s nd c �c ra oVe:� 'v- Liou,nc i JJr./L i`QI�Q� 1•`�� 1 �i'�--' 6LVY 1J' 1L ^-�r Y' �Sec_A , _ � f pp n I p I CASAV JD, •Y 1JLrf G/a� +IL (\a.G;mac. t..,(11' t'hA Lt1'P� [ -CQ YYW )2 rA- �qe G./eN — Nof i)\- Y, vn cxeLi e `u`�r -01 1 --- o t,L.�c�1 CJ s.t_ �� sz loe d-u id �(2Lt �2 5 V (Q DSe ck, -19,?-eAn. L c Leo Y) - , IA-4,411SCII,DIA titer e,�,-I� IL s a 4.L LA • our Ginn A ,itG kl A-‘1 A,(P J - James D. Mc i --- �5 ' • 7004 S 130th it �� use . Seattle WA 98178 _- -s 1� .. � 11' -E�W.^�4` '1- ar il''' � .- De-'T . o LOW\1'v11.L Y1 it --IgAiE L c7�YY�IZ,v�� c - M 11 4, , S Ilk ' /26 617 Ai Care '2 ( PLANNING DIVISION � O l c1TY OF R�Efaf'1IJN ?—(7- �41( (/VCR MAY 1 a 1990 , /w 1 ) /?7 F4E:COVED `G'egA' ?it ci'r/Lc_ wir) p!,),71:. c, f4i.zi ce,frr.(t /7).//a.pv_ei �/Li `iC 4a4"4,//uv GI% �. gpdeeiz0 . 4i_ 4 /n'UL 1K(. ' W(2' 4e- - • Ate_ ao-V_ ,.,k ,ffu___ iivteru -tA / q fhl- - 16 kAic(dcic, ,t7, ((,,. ,,,,,-,4 i Abmt,A,6 „ u ,.(,),,,„„1, --fil .„,,,I, „,,,y," a-a^ 4-0 . kezt,21/1/iri- dit0710 1* ' : . de rvel• azi- 47-4-y aA,Q____. 40 AdiVe 6‘ --/-6 A:d•coei A i ?,,G ./ne" .--bc' a/4- ' ----- ,i/A _liciL ote,,Le. t it:0g ,ag- ) , 7)16?-eh -t.ai --t.- a.(;(-74,4/0,-71 `/4/--a h le, .. Meat do ltd.- ditelgi 11/ti Lk/ "1- (i2-60-&. gleAd-b ' 1- , -ID .- tk- , . ' - ' sT —Ylu—' 6,i", • , we. • t_ 64/(44 -it t c r 7,,,,,/„, , ,zi, - ' ,,,,,,.*6--- p_4„o., .;T. ,,,)s_S S„ Go i • --. -- ------ --- -------- . CX-;O:Nic-5 017.;-_,53 7 6"C!-‘1, •(:),D ---- !-- ! !' dr," ;, . 1.....,cfm- . ------ym -'' Qe/Q/Ac' ?I't 1 / — . , :- .,, tn 1 SerVI ....Orr9 N'IrCr`r - 1 - - vor_ —r -..,,,o--v : _ c... ,..„, tey.,-1--4-6-- --1—ceserrn s- t--4,--.4) -T--; 7 '' s-1 -1-4) - • ...- .-^,r0 4-0.-14-:-.y—•--v,„si,j) , Tv's0-'"V•44- Niri,v1 7- ••••\ - 1 ••••1:4,\Vic\ —tiQ - -If '-.'3W _t, --TNIT -rrin cp\---17 L tlf, /Is, Jr _066u40,1--- sw6--- - -- -.-T-s1-- --er-Ns NCIf: .----- - _ Nollisgiri3P--n,rvv14 ---- ( ' ,, : . _ ) ' 11 .• /- . _______ - '‘i ' (r41 f' / Q?D • fear iti?G et-- �cn'f n vir ,Jun e d Ramty PLANNING DIVISION pub• Of (,omnuo;by pGVG1ofd friettV CITY OF RENTON 4900 fr//// 9 vemi4 5'okth, � MAY 1 0 7990 iq n on, WA /AO. RECEIVED Rear Pr ceice, woe .a-0 ow- lea4;c$ 4 ice, - bAt t ki o"sr,,5 or kr/n Mov0noit.s, 50 do the hab/cs o,f t4G "VAC, oaf o tI er tvi/d/,; e 114 the e44oirr ever Riparian irrst and Heron Roofer need tie Gonad' 'on5 � f�i . et nut) bktil lirt , ,rcrorin 40,, di swedrance �a�r o, t sw*rip wAer� & oet and Ar- a va14b1c .vo dd i4k.si a 6 t° oq t4 a bah,es ham' ra,j d iri tit-di fnort y rtGs fis • <n area, . p 44.r tit/n/4 4y and 4ek' ,C,Z, o44 ro b&&b o t t c� w�/clip has: Let r�® p � 1i54Noint ' lest. .�J'y di-stork/1 kel n;h of Mc tom® birds -Mae tr 4.4uitu u s wAtuz w& se& teilo/omerit pc vl conG /o er r' year, 'k ash 5a ve 'ham 5 EvQ n1a P4r13'10. .t/t a itoo's e • • • • • • 1-- _ y 4.4a-mo0••. 4 n{ ',. , • ,A,__ ,.., - ,-Ari ..7y, `,. 40,'' brs+-. 1. t 4 • (,.""\ • 1,-..-",1/4 .r \r6-- /C-v--, 8' A .: al 0.7.•il P °VC-0 ryo io MAY o: L-y-v-c-- r . (k,,,„,,,,,,,, , _....,-- 8 ,anta i RE) ` 3 'S I„ 101I • . .,„ . -., • //'.1.‘ '7,` 1. '-- \ .-- 9 MAY -- ,-.,----,--,---„2-'----2-trZit.,,Cialt4;'1. • '*,-.J3 90 '7: , __,.._. .-_,---, 5--.-1,'F--- xoL___L}gip mit ----;. Mary hytlfle. Myer Senor g;iivt*ren.motha I Planner - OV b• o/ Corn Miii n I 1,,q ea veky,meot- . ...1°° 1117/ Avenke 5out It Rem 44, 14/4 9 to,5:6—* ArtG ii,'nore,nla/Z, 5e//eve, t4/4. 4#00'4/ 111. Wm/ s piAj PLANNING DIV!,,M1 GM'OF M'a,2 /116 Alter 1 1990 RECEIVED / f:in cover mei a/bent tile a( cif Ae 314c/c 7Vi'l/er ,444e/ €: the Pkteirant Ae &Vocals avid park 144 t iN /ce fo 11e "iftio."--74 ( 5n#1,1- o, re'4 7 L e/willarAAle amhoodwri q Me &owl/ rtwee : PiNtiptet- eitimin47 G44141 • /at Air slotei . 504cadr X0-W5 JUSSevi 2 2/302 f-h SA/ 1/t/MIoN Abt 913740 .-// 3 - 2595 Q07. ,5-/i4e4y, 7,2s-73 s-c,) red„k ,ed PLP- 'ING DIVISION Ci . OF RENTON 5/At GUA la MAY 1 1 1990 7 27 / RECEIVED Ado.. /7/vyik, c_04_c_e,L,./t4 7--L; ria-e_e_e-ts r P-674-4-a-c-P etA_ 42a-6 /1-Z jeL7-7,& 4QJ4.c_4k ar. 6u, X /te_4&) cett) a-a-en.S a_6" 71-4-a-J _ -.77 77;)ssz PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAY 9 1990 - 577/TO • ECBVED 0i-& r i� 4- . _& S 17)7 , -1A-4.- c -rJ u -cam._ ��- -.- ,)La-,c�/ )3 t.,. /1"0-0_ C"1-- _- 0 J �-- .,� +A-a-4- • M:4--• ot-La-IvL- C . - 6v-4-Jatft- • S • L C 3 S3 Cr o27 LJ, /3 S iA it Ce E q i . I I f • 1141/42e c f �i. 1.1 2 a Vi 1:I• 1,1 1,1 , 1 rfrl rdi ' 1 1:1 . I. 1.1 i 1 1 I, 1'1 I ; i 11 I , PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAY 8 1990 May 7, 1990 Mary Lynne Myer, Senior Environmental Planner, Department of Community Development, 200 Mill Avenue, South Renton, Wa. 98055 Re : Proposed development near the Renton Heron Rookery and Blackriver Riparian Forest Please use your influence to save the wonderful natural treasure which. the City of Renton still has, not only the unique heron rookery and habitat of other waterfowl, but the ancient riparian forest which cannot be replaced. I feel that the present EIS is totally inadequate to protect this natural wonder, an urban Walden still intact. I hope that the officials of the City of Renton will realize that the natural environment is a priority item now with most citizens. Renton will receive more benefit and recognition nationally from preserving their rookery and ancient forest than from the erection of a few more office buildings . Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, c74_t_:, Lois Nord qui t' s ` 13503 Empire Way S . , 301 A, Seattle, Wa. 98178 Phone: 277-9490 copies to: Mayor Earl Clymer §g CB i 8W 18EuRfflE VATglant Nancy Mathews • jI 9 • ip V • ilk I, 7_27_ 9'90 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON • 791 n.vt., • , MAY 0 1990 4Orly 4e/16- 6;4 /6- xdr-v--47 7 - • o . tite. 6-74? ,dio j ' /7" L7,?114 .5 J. ive,s , 066-.2.--,' . ' ' , . - . ' ' __I;Z- - i-,-,zet__ :,,,_:..J. ,y. , .#,.A,,,,_,, , , . , - / �� .-- I/ /.;,-,--,___,..„.,- „:„.,,,' , . . , r -41-A7--,- -.__. . , . .' .. 1Lth-Le--- , *k-, --&-t-e, ---.. ,‘!‘e:--e---.4-e--e- e------ - : . -__! . . . ,i, . . a....„...„/...,&„.. ____.z,r,..z,._;,„ ' d„...... ___,,,e, .Ici-c. /1.7-4--ere-- :. • •: ' ' - . , .--%-a--r. ;L-• __--=-e- rI—f-r-4-e--' . -r\--x-44/1--- ''' ' . ' • i 1 . �. - / / -- ,, . . -.. .. ., . ... 1--�- /. '. )-- 0 -' — -- ' n 4 Le - ,. - -', . ,,' i_._„I?9...t.,..,. . ..--yk.„.., 1 - 1, . . . . . . G�-"''�-d Lam- ` .+ . , ke____,...„6-,-,_,. • . . . . ._ , , ; , . ,..7,... ---____,,h,- _,_ i,,,,. • - . - .r-'7 ' .. - ' " -Ar — ' . 1 • - • __CteAj___1/4) '. . . '• ' .D.e.,e, ...„(... .„4. . . • it) �yz ,fr. _1,t. u ci °tom ' _ - . . I . • • • • I • I -I • - May 7, 1990 Mary Lynne Myer Dept of Community Planner We much enjoy the birds, including an occasional heron, at Coulon Park and the Cedar River Trail The Blackriver Riparian Forest and Heron Rook— ery would provide environmental and' educational opportunities that should not be lost. Ken and Ada Shannon 11721 78th Ave. S. Seattle, Wa. 98178 PLANNIS 772-1658 GiTY DFNG RDIVl EfJT®(�14N 0 1990 RECEIVE® 4iiiksh.: ' firio ' PLANNING DIVISION '- )U...,.., (4.; ,i,,ziL___„, 51.7e-t-/, r d- - RECEIVED CITY OF RE/NTON MAY 1 0 1990 7 -1,--- e-L..• ..., , ,,,E. :ite_<( _IF• . .-,- /t, ,v: Ytrs — a--e-vi-e-L&A-#-- -,--k "1---- •,,__m' e-,. , . ,...,„( ,__e_74,,,,,z.fir__ .,,--t-- - -- a A)- e...., .....„....6, /-1__, / 417 --------4. 2h-, ,k.,,...,e, ---/-z-a---L-e4 .../f '-D ' 0 , 4 a-e--12- 17 Llr) -- j/ ,7_,..._c_...,.../,.,--,e_ „,„.2....„. 7-.....,e', l' ,61 (.._: "1—.1__e-,a-e-,..-e_e_-- )_-de-L_ /43-1,--- ---"" a vt, - 49--0 (-.,- --1 ,, ,---t--z-z-c.e. 0 --',-2 - ' 76; 7 j----2- • 5 e-e... /77---6‘ 4:-.- 4,--- ei 81/ 7 7,_s--3--— cS il ei r --7=_rafrA- .e.—/5,---/€7,1 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAY 8 1990 May 6, 1990 Ms. Mary Lynne Myer Senior Environmental Planner Dept. of Community Development 200 Mill Ave S. Renton, WA 98055 Re: Blackriver Riparian Forest and Heron Rookery Dear Ms. Myer: I am writing this letter in response to a notification from the Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation group of the planned development of the area adjacent to the above- referenced heron rookery. I am a great supporter of wildlife, and feel that too much development is detrimental to our local wildlife populations as well as man's ability to live in harmony with our fellow creatures. We depend on one another for survival , and when the wildlife goes, we go. I feel placement of the buildings and parking areas, as proposed, is too close to the heron rookery, and without adequate buffering, will cause all the wildlife in the area to be disturbed by the noise, pollution, and movement of people and machines. If this occurred, it could cause a disruption of nesting and reproduction cycles. I also feel that the proposed paving of the area will eliminate habitats for other wildlife, and local extinctions could occur. This I feel would be a dreadful loss, one which is preventable. Sincerely yours, )1/j,e/ ee Zipira 18039 S.E. Wax Rd. Kent, WA 98042 630-2302 /�Ale cd 51/44o id F S