Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA88-085 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: METRO FILE NUMBER: SA, SP 085-88 LOCATION: Renton Sewage Treatment Plant at Oakesdale Avenue and SW 7th Street. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle 2 . Applicant: Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle 3. Existing Zoning: P-1, Public Use 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: O-P, Office Park; L-1, Light Industrial 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Public/Quasi-Public 6. Size of Property: 83.5 Acres 7. Access: Monster Road SW 8. Land Use: Metro Sewage Treatment Plant 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Undeveloped East: Undeveloped & Office Park South: Industrial West: Industrial C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation 1745 4-14-59 Amend. Ordinance 1764 5-27-59 Amend. Ordinance 1928 12-22-61 Special Permit SP-065-81 Special Permit SP-006-83 Conditional Use CU-007-83 Substantial Shoreline SM-107-83 Variance V-045-84 Conditional Use CU-087-84 Variance V-088-84 Substantial Shoreline SM-118-84 Rezone R-046-85 3961 12-13-86 Shoreline Exemption SME-003-85 Site Plan Approval SA-061-87 Special Permit SP-062-87 ter.. • •A A B A • C A D E ..4_`•'. F A 0 H 3v I ,,,:''.-1. I c a�a • I / I II —� ` f` cxcINEA • r -'~' 5 (7-8 FT) CUPRF�OCYPARIS LEYLANDII • I!! II � l I J,i t . 4 (6-7 ) OUERGU� __;\ , � - / / ,0 I gr,I • • v 4 (5-.4 r-) Rt#i5 TYPHINA • V �' • /�it,n '`j 14 t30-w(N) PIiQrINIA FRASERI 44 (1 641-) COTONEAs"rwz Ll4MMERl C7=o"o.G.) • I�teE • , / Ili::: 710V).1.i; . 1 - • - ,,;:‘,,,c,. .f•I .',.c.c, - /{ = ^' r11.0 , �''i 17 I l 1'IN-.CA..' ACER IcU'IbIKUM 'oc-vvl R 6IOICY i ��I, i i # Otif 1..itritrAll171.• i 0. ° �N• 2 (�-1or1) cl•IAMA19Gt(PAIcps LAYdsONIANA• _ tal I; ' ,fig % • 4.(G-7 Pr) PINLI THUNP�Ett6I j AREA>SHOWN ON THIS PLAN i KEY PLAN i � s�3 (4 µ Pors' AlecosrAPrtYLOS UUA-u►c51 (t'-6�oc)• • • :f 4 NO SCALE - (4 IN Por)GAULTHERIA SHALLoN (41-01 o.C> • • • 0 '! 135 (1 6 z ) MAHoNIA Re1�ENs C7-o"o.C) i 1 z, �° ?I 1 C 1. IN. CAL_.) LIQUIDAMSAR 5T{RACIFLUA , �Vi ! IS • • `r • %j 2 C78 P77 THUJA PL.KATA , i I; t ?:- 1 (G -.7 Ft,MULTI5TEM)f1GER GI1ccINA UM \ .J j; ,ii,4WIZirk/'. ,/ cl. -•. - - ' .z II 4 ,` ;War 1/Mir'0 /1 . .. • • " • Or HYDR05EED SLOPES AND PIbTU�BF.D A15r=P1S • I .„ ' •�� , W/ERO�Ic)nI LonIrRD� mix SEE SFEG'S. (TYP.) \ I (D-% FT7 CEDRUS_G_ ARA 1 ., -- \ , :•-•mr. a i ., 1. .. .... •. ...,. • ".r , • J I`fT `+` : 4 (6-7 F`T-) LTu cu GGLCINEA . _ . � • I `� ,.. . 1!1 IN- GAL.) ACER RUERIUM 'oCToI er GLORY' _`�_ II I . . �� i l�'r r 4 *( --4 1'T) IKHUs TYPI-IINA \ i 3 / 1tir+ IS(56AL-) AteesU-ru5 UNEtao % �jts ' 3 / r� 4`� • - {i425 /4 IN-Por) AK GTOTArH-no uVA-UIcSI (ILO aC) t [G-7. FT,MULTts7>cN1) Ac>=R GRGINATUM '� 1 •�' a) j �•L.. e, (18-ZI IN•> RHOpoPENDRoN CATAWI31ENSE AL®Us • • 35<5 6AM..) coRNUs STOLONIFFirTA M • �G 1 I �i �` l.,. 58 CZ •(aqL.) MAHONIA AOUIFDI-IUM C7-O D•G) *l (6-T t'ri QUEICGus COCCINEA ' �O•r1, g 4 -- et.„0�!:�� W. %►, 6((y 7 F T) QUERGUS GOGGIr1E�) • 3 C7 s F'T) CL>PR� c1cYPaRIs LEYLANI I -,� L�``I i ► .z- -��.~ . �1 NYnROSEEt7 sL-op , AN°pI6TUT BE>7 AREAS �Ir�* ,..„, `. • �: / ' ' . • W/EROSION LONTROL MIX -5=E 5rcC.'S._(ImP.) \ I ' I' j _ 1 C 1 IN.GAL) ACEfC RU6RUM OGT06ER GLORY 4i �� - 2. (G-7:FT.) PINUs THUNI'E-I 6II II I -►---i �,� �I� 3<7-bP7) f?sfU�rBUGA MElzlt= 11 9 C3=�} PT> 1ZHUs 'TYPHINA _ • ,I +: - ' - - • 8 �1 i�; I- 5 (IYS-ZI IN.> RHoDODENPRON EVER sYINlup.1, i •• ••,',eft" I (I SEE PEC SECTION 01014 FOR • • ,'' ��„ -r. • I - 4 (7-8.'P17 THUUA PLIGATA CLEARING REQUIREMENTS 2 ) '�.j�tr ,,��, log (2 GAL.):MAHONIA REF't;Ns (7'o'oc) • • 4 5p p.— — 2 l 4447.4 �!: �,�` �t� ! • :; • q(b 9 FT) cEDRUS DEOPARA -.......:•:: 411111111 '•-7,.4,hy ,'d1•.CIA \\`161 '% !n U8-ZI INS RIIDDODENDRAN G9TAVCIbIENSE.6Nv4NGIFLORUM '• •-.- : • w et-iir 'all. 1►'\i1. ns.,-��• :J �4 mot. STEEL BED >=PIvE •. �t-.,... w.-4 �t • • `. - '► ..v.„ `�:. fiwe A. -44 !•�F 7' �� A, *� �� r�ii!. : 3 (6-7 Pr) C�MJERGIJS COCGINEA • . �'- •• Z1.....; :2 1,, 1 4�. _H 1' 0"..*4 11: jIlt. -_. . 7' �� 28- C2 6A1.-) MAHDNUA AouiriUM (7=0''D.0 1� �'� /� RE r... •n''y' ✓��`' �f` 7 1 • a LAYER U - ' .t. f��"+w ,� • z(7-5r'r) 1=15UPOTSubA MENZSISII CLA55 El MAT'L I - J�y.t �� ` '�. � � (CRUSHED ROLK • 1 , . FRANK ROSS , '(�� IiA, �'% i% �\ • SEE NOTE 6/�5 CERTIFICATE NO.a7 -+�1 •.� .41.... .��' �► /l,�, ` 1 - •• ' 5 !1a-24{N> fcl IOG►�PErIDRON LODERI ONE INCH /- �^ �! • !� `� ��• �L `+ •►\v t i . i---i ., �'M''I^ A rI fI � "e to I :,4,:--. ' BO 11 6AL.) GOT�NEAS2♦rB_ DAMMERI (7'-0''o.G) • -- - J IZE IF NOT 0 AT LONE INCH •��. �• —t- 0 �- - i . • r - ' SCALE ACCORDINGLY. /« MONSr �� - nr7 •• • �� o ROAD — ``` NI NI NI FOR GENERAL NOTES SEE DWG G 100. r L A N `Z 9 x Dwa.uD ""AUG. 1987 1 &1z. /1-tw METRO MtaIk+>»u1r of ME1 11.,n Seattle BROWN AND RENTON TREATMENT PLANT �'• •" CALDWELL Osborn Fr Roy, Pe- 1"=2O ' = CONSULTING ENGINEERS Plonners, inc. _ " "°'°o n'�� LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN °"•��•'��" } SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 1414 RlosI on Woy.Scottie.WosM,gton veto{,.. ENLARGEMENT II H :Auk /�''� G 129 W Y •D- •E V I 1 I ON •T DATE " ' 47DF 74 • A B C A D A E A F A G _ H IOC 9'I OI-0,1 4 I 0 0 60' o A �� GRd-O in �Tar . �' gl- Ov O 3 0" IINIDIANOLA 3'-42' . ::: FA I LL fDE n_ i • — U 1 1Iill A" m BIOMASS/D.FIR PLANTING AREAS CONTROL AREAS =1 U' 1 0 '' v. . ov U 0 fp _tea /.filli 6. 1 O CROSS SECTION OF SOIL HORIZONS PVC SCH.BTTP• , CLASS FI CONCRETEl. FILLED WITH WT'LE / IOLoN 10'-O" NO SCALE- MIA= _ , NOTE: POPULAR hI HIPS SHALL E•E �► • PLANTED G" INTO THE SOIL, I D: (e.n-'-'.'r'\ - 4e,' MAX,-TYp• kII H �° O QUICK COUPLING VALVE PLANTING SPACING I 2'x6" HEADEREoARDE I , NO SCALE A BIOMASS AREA _ 4 O No ScgLa j /�� • , ._ �_� � _ -/I III= _ -I FINISH GRADE 4 I II I II III �I 8-O -0 !t 11 I Z'x4° SPLICE-6'NAIL4II•_ Iil Z II. III BACKFILL WITH SUITABLE EXCAVATED 11 71 �- 36' TY14 I ii RI �111 III MATERIAL,ADEQUATELY COMPACTED. 0 0 O0 = —w — I IIII iri .. ti. o ICo d COMMON GALV. NAILS' - N ,, III =1 TRACER'WIRE OR DETECTABLE TAPE • 9Ec All 8'-O" (p0' 60' �}''-O'I Q-'-pal ' .6 IB O COMPACTED CRUSHED GRAVEL 8'-O" 1' - * �..1�� .4"GRAVEL 11" IRRIGATION PIPE _R�TT �••� - III . . , 0 '- "1 „ c 19 _ - _ �7�_3 111 _ISFJ.b':H :'w.l I;Iv'. .•:,FA I•.'—4 MIN. L04 - _I 11 -III —IL i .. I I 111-. • :'I I. — E E = E." EXISTING SUBGRADE , 11111 • _ 111n GOMPAcTEb 5u6GRkuE li • Jm '��•- 3 1 LEIII -1STAEALIz:D AGCRE6ATEI 111.' _ • •.III ' gLpd 8'-OD • Ea, a Gour2 1 D.t,. - • <: .;-III O TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL DOWNSTREAM OF R.C.V. 3 -�11 No SCALE- ' 2"X4'IX18R STAKE I ' 'I`Ci. • 2'x6' pod& FIR HEADERSoARD METAL SUPP0 T To 0B CPRESSURE 'TREATEr.,hTANDARt'OR 5ETTE.1R.-) CENTERED IN coNGRETE FooTIN6: PLANTING SPACING i _ SECT ION A "FORME AND SHIZFAC.eB"NUMBER AE 2076 FWIsH GFADE7 O DOUGLAS FIR AREA PATH DETAL TRASH RECEPTICLE NO ScAL - CIO -11= i N=11= 110. SCALE-: 1'-I'"o" NO SCALE iv ..:, . 11 494 POLE GAP, GALV. STEEL - III - U _ 72d VALVE. KEY : tD 12'I cIRLDLAR NON-LOGNIN6 VALVE.GAP' '� .,.K.lew.,. CONCRETE SUITABLE- 2 61 I '::...,.X.::Hiiiff".':•::':Tile!I i!=":eae-" "COLLAR" / III'. g'', 'TYP , 1'�ALKFILL _ 2 5 6ALVANI=.ED E,HG 4O FIRM. ,/ IF`---�I .. ' .- _ 2%�°O.D. .j1 ,��,fig PIPE IREIGATION _ SGHED. 4o PUG GLEEVE ..+ V....?...,. e . e e O 11EilasH ! A. , --.-'. 40 c-.. . , . . -, _ 7 ��n- - - �I� MIN. 2" E I IO DIII e -e...•- v _.._ - THAN IRRIGATION PIPE GRAVEL PATH ' AND EXTENDING 12' 4"PVC PIPE - pEYDNb PATH OPT ROAo "FoIRMS AND SLIZFAce."NUMBERS AG 0001 AND AK.6011 SLEEVE EACH END. ol OGRATE BENCH • O IRRIGATION SLEEVE DETAIL L FINISH CoRApg VALVE' KEY No OCALE NO SCALE 1 r _I i1I-. KEY HEAD "LI I GONcRETE. PooTINco OI��7+Ih1 61 5 HET K E. LllaL�RI • , 1 I io MANUAL d'• DIA. DEAN , MIN. 4 C.F. DRAIN ROCK .O BOUNDARY MARKER NO SCALE • O MANUAL DRAIN VALVE AND GRAVEL SUMP NO SCALE- 900 SUBMITTAL INOKITERRCFDECTS&FLIWNERS RENTON DEMONSTRATION �s��M.W. jp METROHI�+I�IPaula of Kerr•opellcm,eaaEue G"`E'B-/9-e8 CHECKED, SCALE. FILE NO. ---- Osborn-&-Ray, - FOREST PROJECT - - RECOMMENDED. E o ER. AS SHOWN MISCELLANEOUS SITE DEVELOPMENT ONANIND ND, Planners, inc. CONTRACT NO. G 14 v \. REVISION BY OATS 1414 Alaskan Way Seattle.Washngron98101 RENTON TREATMENT PLANT APPROVED. ET wiM20-88 DETAILS sxE NG.Ia la N0. - ENO. ENGR' �IR. ,",w A V V v V B D E F G H 1� \` 11 / - -- ; \ zI _ _.__ MAT64LJN6 1 51 k - • �_ \ Lam_��/ � -� �� =� —�_ a--- ----__--------___ -_______- \'\ TI TI • -____ --____ ----=_—_-__--_--21_ . , r,--.--- , • . • • xal I \X 1� � 4 • x� 40♦ ♦♦ 3 • oO E ISOE I500 \ / ♦ ♦ I�\ ''+ + i � ♦ • .I• ( '' -,,, •s-,,,„ s \ ♦•=�♦♦ • • `. ♦`i[:. _ La , , r 4,0NNNN'N. „x x., . - . \ \ -� � 111�� ,,� • + E 1400 • AREA BKEY PLANS PLAN + + I NO SCALE \\ -_ I \+ Z 1 \+ v \ d +\+_ F is z OI z 90% SUBMITTAL r. PLAN 20;• • 1,, — F.R. i/METRO NtntolpcLI ty of M.tropoLl tm Seattle ur, LiL{ncpu s RENTON-DEMONSTRATION �� SA E8-19-as OpAYN: CHECKED. -SCALE. -Osborn&Roy, -FOREST PROJECT • D.R. F.R. 1H=20'-0" Oflfl6fs, inc. �`"'E�' • LAYOUT PLAN 2 c.v.. N. 6 1414 am xo Wog,seotlN.W0Hh,n910n9alol RENTON TREATMENT PLANT, CONTRACT NO. G 8 K• X0: REVISION DATE PP"°. W/M 20-88 SET N0i 8 °F 14 C p , E F V G • H r • g� sl _ • 1 11 �o, �,O (-' (_)1( (- (� • �� II II II a uIg II _ u II I -11 • p1' I . 4 V 5 m • �� Cam- - ,0;-1 7-I 4� ALP 0 Ij 5 T Eli.11 in "I Elli I . IT a•.: „ ' • I�`.v •�A'J . '• . i • . Q14i0 t , • I� ®AREA II EROW S Tu PLAN N�, ' IE I600T T JT 1- j I t E 1600 . 9 II II II II 11 it II II.\,.. _ .., • - ' - .„ _ ___ G L C G C u G G ____ ..s,_ r , • __ _ , I -- ‘ ----.-ir . ci 3 • EI500 I IT —I I li Ili 1 1 I 'I ' E1500 I 51 '. .t: + Li C I Q" )) • l / • • I 2 „ , ° - '�� '--\/ / ,/PATH N0. 1 © 1� . \ ke ��, �� SEG1N 4'-0°hltvE 1 I ' /' / E 1400 I , &PAVEL PA-rl-1 1 ' I i • I / :`,� AT N 120G, E 1872 i •I ,+ 1'- E,.. \ ,.,• - PATH NO. i i I-----� I • - / /// st ,::.s MAX. Slope — - _ 0 / \:' NOT To EXCEED , `•:';\ i I ° , ______---/ ,,,/ ° • • ".'c 90% SUBMITTAL IHIT�CFPE rsaifKi56•FtRfBiS RENTON DEMONSTRATION F.R. %RI ETRO M,I IpaEl ly of lNEropoLlEa1 5•yttl. a-r9-8a Osborn-ErRoy. FOREST PROJECT Pawl. -F. zo'oN VILE., n Planners, inc. D.R. _F.R. n J914woyoRun Planners: Uinc. m98p1 RENTON TREATMENT PLANT _ • . .m, — CONTRACT --LAYOUT PLAN—I- - - °""Y1G_7---- Rla ray REVISION 6r DATE • I �Pp0.0 W/M20-88 `#ET No.7 OF 14 - - - _ -_ v EN6R, ENGR, 4I11, A V H - C 0 E F V 6 V H A I1EM A 8 A C A D I� E F A G H �aa • /7 • E2�00' I I / ± // / 1+ IT,t / - -Mal:i l" 4E / o • �:.. _ - Qom,.L'�(..E 1(��I - $r • -II IV LIT L RI �`d�� 1. // • ry / • 1 / fJ AREA SHOWN ON THIS PLAN / ' KEY PLAN NO SCALE , • / 4 E2300 I / 4 //./ , 41 • y ' • E 2200 / + / ---- ' /7 o. / LAN P.OX. $OlAN I I I LI /,' LAN�LAPE AND I�QRIGATION ' SEE SPEGIFILATIOR�j, _ _ E.NLARL,EM6NT 7L-1-1 / LANVSLAPING ANV IRI2IGATI011 7 P / 2 // / • 0 / 2 O . p / O / y/ ' MEET AND MA OTCH (—NM". LIMIT LINE 70 EX1TIN(! EARTH BERM Y" ' / G 15-A TOE OF FILL ELOPE C'J I(v '1E2 I O0 • / / G IS , G15L , 1 GlE-E7 Apo / .Z:1 SLIOP -NLAx--TVP� �'�D G4) PIPE 120 120 TOP OP FILL G 14 (4', GA�Plp t SEE hHEET GA} F012 LIMITS OF W K. • = //, C�17'aJ t &RAVIN0 L0o DINATE .1 � =43t • y, EX16TIN&EL..W.EVGE •I i ' o j' g'/A SHALLOW SWALE, -- 1 I f o I 120 0---+ + 111177 + x (H8) + o 120 _ • N = dgi =I % i �I 9O% SUBMITTAL o I'I PLAN 30 __ __ PDSCFPEFTCHIECTSErREDNERS , RENTON DEMONSTRATION �E��x �;;METRO ""f F.R. ntniolpaU ty of"Metropolitan Seattle fJ-/9-$$ -_ _- - _ _- - - - DRAM CHECKED. SCALE. FILE NOS - - Osborn-&Roy,_ FOREST PROJECT D.R. M.w P=20'o" Planners, inc RECOMMENDED. GRADING, PLAN 3 DURING"°' — 1414 Alaskan Woy Seattle.Woshagton981O1 RENTON TREATMENT PLANT W/M20-86 _ G 6 _ N0� REVISION BY DATE APPROVED - - - SHEET NO. 6 - - - -- EMa, ENGR. 4IR. 6 14 ,u co.w,rt mrc.,o..n A I 8 0 D E F G H • �s-_ _— A — 9 _— C A_ —. o • �_ - E _ _F— - _ G . . _ . MIMI I , , . ..F- _ - .. . 1 , -. i . , . • tili: ul 'll� . ... _ • EU t -. '. . . ._ �y . •• I II II T E 2000 QI♦�i� • . I I I I I • • �' II • ' ■ANEA SHOWN ON THIS PLAN - , ► • - KEY PLAN - . -.• No SCALC _ . z . •J 1- 4 I • • - '--II— IT It I II II + j[ . 4- . 3 r 1\ ... 7 _......_ .y.._ . N• ) 81800 2 WAS GAS %��--_ �� c �_;- \\'r-� • SECT 1I IAA// �\ A � } -c=—/ `-x=/ 'i \ i RING 7,42.fR _r‹. a A . • S 0 • . \\HANflICAPr ems. , ' . Zl ' • t tr \ % z..�,.;.;`: '1 \ /ice--� Ors=` END t'ATt�`No.1 .- I / J -� ` BEGIN PAT .2 ( I,� / +'::.. • + -} E 1700 �C\-11 N 1927 Iln9Co7 ///��ff/�/jam /zi \` ) �� z z ``�\ ,0 90% SUBMITTAL al NI ATGHLINa 1 z PLAN 21 IA'TYCfPE ff1}ifKFi R,1SFtJJERi RENTON DEMONSTRATION - - n:171ETR0 Pt.IolpoLtty of N.tropoLl ton S.ottL. 6,iE�g/9-88 SY.a. am. SCALE. FILE tp� — - - , -- - - - - - -• - - _ - _ _ _ Osborn&Roy, FOREST PROJECT D.R. F.R. I"�20'0" - Plonners-inc. - - -- ---- - -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ RED• - MAYla.NO. 1414 Rloskon Llloy.Seottle.WoshngtmCB101 RENTON TREATMENT PLANT -— - — - C4xtMti w,_ _ _ LAYOUT PLAN 3 _ G 9 //QQ��``(( au. REVISION aT OM • ..faovm. W/M20-88 SET'° 9 tF19 t .M co.me,e L.rc nv, 414, A - 9 - C 0 E F - L - V N r - ti u A A " ,l N 700 A .. \ • \ 1 N r1 N2000 I P N2000 y ' ; o ' :':,:��li, / � :m � _ ! / / m T ° '• I m N 500 .9 N 600 0 �1►J IL �J �- - / Q 1 r • / / . / • \ N2400 I / ( IU a N2400 • r s 3 i . . .. I q i \\., . / z - j l Luck, N 000 . . A So me3mommoo� o41 I Z $ ppppppfa ,r�R "'"SSS0o15g O0aNNP.YNN Iii \ ` / pI / 0 t / / 'z /. 1 • N2300 ,I / // . fp / / I I3 • g �.+ �+g g r x�� m gliirss i Rilo108d O 8k'86Pg I `� I / i// i/ / / 1 y, s \ Ki I {38R'44tyi��'.$ I $1Oe`t43SiwS40Y9'Si i • j / I i . • 1 I . / . . 1 "00 6,....„i2 4 .1.-FWAkit isisbtW.itk. 4— 1 N+, . nn(4 1�1.II��nc+��"��+rr1+FIC'.EFI$S9RQPeer: /. / P IV P\xfoo.mf�I/1t{x1.GN.+O a N2200 • / x22oo' M • / c , I k perj(C� fX�++yj�r.� r gpj�j /\}/ � 011 itsisekc ��Wit:b i4§GisatiAigc II ,• 1• �� \ ` 4, \ \ I • \ k N 300 fey yet^\-p pp Epp Jp�Vpy Jpylll pp�,^�.'j�y1�y1� NS00 \ - �I ,yLk I 1:: 4, NO�Nyyp&p��yN� IyZ•i��{yTCiliiPNaiiaJP(.N�OPy��i • II^ 1 ,l \ \\\\,\\\D5 �I NV l.I.Y1,t is ±6 °'.o Bir6th 3lBY1 \ \�"•[O • I p • / !Jopo // II I 1 ' } \\ • 4 i /- • • • • . . . • I I \ ► ' \ fffnnn _ L• 12•S KV 44 O ! \ 1 \ \ I I \ �, `. �4 i r i I Oki 1 I \ 0 N 200 __I '/ N 200 I / ' - ' GI- IT— TI I / / _ • J/ I 1 _ c 7• I I I I / \to CI r CI _ P.S.P.6 L.230 KV _ ¢ I I' I ' ! \ I \ \ `1 �^ • P•• w 0 — N200 / ` N n c II I f� x I : o �i I I do o,. r f / g g ' III II IIJI , s / / 1. ...I .-- % a C)KT • IN) MU I /L1L / CI) iII/ li � K . B C . A . A E F A G A H • 6E 6R0C.0 ON 50 INDIANOLA SOIL-TVP "HAUL. ROAo'7 OF DOUG FIR DEMON6TRATION AREA EXCEPT DOU6. FIR CONTROL — II. ... 1//1i1 . • -fir —GE GIOO60 ON 36:N INVIANOLA SOIL-TYP AREA _—�iO 150 OF t5ioASS DEMONSTRATION AREA M 5 EXCEPT S1OMASS CONTROL AREA. FINISH &RADE, G4 PIPE • 5 —si2'I INDIANOLA SOIL-TVP• I40 • OF P+I0MAs6 CONTROL AREA . � 42" INDIANOLA 601E-TYP OF vat Cam. FIR CONTROL AREA i 130 • 10. :12.0 -- ---- f---EXISTINCO GRADE IIO 4 SECTION A-A 4 SCALE: VERT: IN=IOI-OD HORIZ.: IN=201-On 0+00 1+00 2,00 5.00 4+90 5+00 0•00 7+00 e...00 '4 I5o I n I5a . 145 ,ii — ME �� 11� I I M = 145 OtAO FEAT-I NO.:t =ya Sy pA NO.1 C-N I'J Z= I -- -0 MAX.-TVP 3 140 -Minn M 140 155 rniMIIMIMM=INIIIMMIEWM 135 • 13a I30 I2 r'I} 1 1 it n r 125 2 PATH NO.2 PROFILE STA.0400 TO 5475 END PATH NO.2 AT APPROX. N 1970, E ISCoS 2 SCALE: VERT: I'I=GI-oN MEET ANP MATCH TO HERTZ: I°=30'-O" aXISTINCv ROAD AT APPROX. EL. 12-S 11. 1 90% SUBMITTAL UTDXFPE rtECTSERFMERS RENTON DEMONSTRATION DE,I �� R. i� II�T �II�O Ito of XallopoLltan Seattle SAYE. Rl3 F. 8-/9-BB DRAWN. RED. SCALE. • eILE Na. Osborn&Ray, FOREST PROJECT O.R. F.R. -AS SHOWN - - - - - Planners, Inc. _ _ - - - - — - — — AEC°'"E'OED, SITE LAYOUT CROSS SECTIONS BUYING NO. CDNTNACC NO. •-m w REVISION - E 1414 Posher way,5eolde.Washng[on9810 RENTON TREATMENT PLANT AcvNDNED. G 13 W/M20-88 4EEl ND.13 DE 14 ,..,coup,.nE, • ENSN. EN[. IN. - • i .one, A • B - C - 0 - E F V G - H — ......, _ - 1 �' �i j / / / • / - MATCHLNE. �aI i\ e',wow raIig� r� ,�4 G4 PIPE'. MATCHL\ �, O L=a�l�!L� . �t�>> � 5 Il 4EEIh 14 A a_PHa -ter . .,- �► t� 11, ,5m b ��\ SEED Mos.THE DEM TIOry _ �'�'�'�� L7oIlGLAS�Fife ON STRATVN --� 6 ` LANTIN(� AREA, cON7ROL �, — N' \_ INd AREP+B AND ALL IcfiL.p)`p PLANSII�I>�AREA\ �- / BARE "fURSEOP PUKING `\. �, 12= - �1 . �BN ,./IQUGT R ,�PECIFIGAT.IQ \. � �Il ' \ }-- 1 /� / -�_` R R0,1p • 1 VE,2" llc--'PfPE, ANa ---_� • QLIIG - 6TEM 70 EXIs,TIN(=—� `` 3 2TU�- ON PIPE. • IJ _ '__ =--�•.A �}-� ��` �` • eoNTleaL rW&AKEo, / / ' - - TI 4Y//II w.I.• .-1 bill ± \ /�� • • -/ ,emu='ai7 \• �� IIIE I ■AIIEA ONOr TNIO SLAM • - • �„_ __ • J(EYMN 1 NO CAL • o • _ :I >` PLAN 28 El Al'.�• 3 . ---...._4, ....,. i �1 `I 34ZE3 � T • 4 �- • I oN I T \' N. • .//. .............x.........!'•••••':'".. ,.. / I �4 O 2 POP P \ 7 t _y - /NA''''' 1 e . I 'II E�0 1— ... 7E1E40 . i ,, w • • • • n' 1 • yI n I , • • go% SUBMITTAL o _ _ _ _ PLAN 6 w'UXaaE XXo-l1EcsswnNCAs RENTON DEMONSTRATION aESI FR• n�mETRO XtniolpaLlty of Metropolitan Seattle °"`E'8-/9-8.8 _ _ - OMNN. NECKED. ROLLE._ — - FILE NO. o - Osborn &Ray, FOREST PROJECT - - - - D.R. M.W. I"=20o-0" Planners, inc. PECO0ENDE0i LAYOUT AND IRRIGATION PLAN 4 DRAWING NO. 1414 XlosLon way Soowo Woshngo 96lol RENTON TREATMENT PLANT CONTRACT x0i G 10 NO. REVISION BY DATE REPROVED. y//M20-B8 ENGN. ENO(1. IIR. SNEEA N0'10°F 14 .n cowa,N.0.ow, A V B 1 V 0 V E F V G V X B C D F. - f n C . MI. M _ / HLINF - • / I �/ _ / �`� �� /(9°c4)PIPE / i.0 V oo iio°�iii/riieiiiii� �I120� ' p,�IA,.TCHLI E _ tiE f I I, / / iy , io • of /i • • I HYPRt76EE WITH' x 5 ' 1i ./ ll/ '\v^`A\^/1 • _EA,cONYf[�L P NTINU' N IN / D �.__Clr.,el'I!� l l I I a�0 •�-�• 4pikO•-- •_-_�,��•.1•-•0 • �u I ROAo APP E.levicn. EA.,. 5 �!Y/%11 es..I. -p {/,, T 1 I �y'�� tJIBTUR6ED OUR !i//`; �Il:.�r.: ::1'!� / l I1J Ipl•'tf1A710N �O •�� •.��•/�� ••�,�\ r,�/ -Tv ‘"" N , G// I� .�, iI OONermucrl' N PE- \ FAi.� I _ Ids/ / PLAN/ti AREA / / •� \ -- -to --.O \ 6" • (�1 w Ty I I6ATI D NOT E2r_Q03 ---,l ,, J:,��.ir il�� 7__ / lI a i iY ••• \ ,.i J - , J/f��F GEbINa. I. 17o-, . nLT.ia / ; ,I. / i eGe ii .� ip ��iaKi0 �fte �� y �� /. / / /I iea,i wi/ii a �•�O=• o,,o �.040 •NW 0., .- I I 1 .1 I _ • �P ;AREA SHOWN HIS/�AR / / /' Pe.W.M•Onfl-4100.W.001000.040 ,01114.4.011, � iiia.tii,l O� i o II��9 0 • : t �/ / / �I BP N0.!o // i1 ��• � I� I11 i , ,po /• >yOp YiGA�OF DIf/ / •• 110 � •�.��-��-�O l • E K I , . . �� i y Il o i�s;:� h times } - i� !� �!y .� G /, / o Oro —• -- �� }!-O �t+� • �a i,�,r�'rl'.��=s i SIOMAss c0�KOL PLA r µ!/ Af{eAy I/ O \ • • O O ��o��i�.••.i�i�j/ fix-:r a#>::utt'a�:,,:�° g; , IId ' i ll _ l /\ �.\ \S\/I � iioOu O• " /�'cP -- wog / ' MGg` t�aNEE QR\ I.,-, ' .,.... 1- • '+ walw (='• I .. .\- // / 7J OO •vO OI ' . - % f �� \ . i L\ .� H I\ Qx, . I �gATdx A . ISALENE,900 / O i O00O , • / �• 1 _——�� \ / l l / i O � � 0I' v r , A LE B3Y AT ,` NIocE __ s '' / � PA Ii\e 'TkM 1. ,,// / /: O . _ 3 \ wAinkt YI aIOMA� / at 7LEAMNOTN6TRAAREA / �, O\ • - — � - \ii ii � A4' ' % ^6?fiF e• w \�Z-�GO�7V PVQ\2.NDl T �O, 4 O 3= ��1�'I �� RN I o _` ON f'-G4 PyPe PT _ ADO.. 3 N - _ SWTQ // G L©� �mbE 6@ �NcK-m PL1¢6 YhuT Q 3 .0 •ii1i .. \ ` E I67 \ " \ , � k i / d . ....1: �\ NDC.IN '.V L T / �49 i / \` W•C1 a �i �I � ;i �in // /r ` T ERPnA6TWINl.6Y0ELEVMAT pp./ / �J � � • / ' $w' R o � rI&�A / M . ;. \\\\\ /--1,‘: J—� FN p TLOFshATREG NpTAL/ 1 � �YI _, ,- ,:07 / / RA A�T \gNT T1614\ \ I70t ie 1a 5 .. \ ��i. . � .� : _1\ \ IC\` : ��i .-4 -sow \ ,i 'tt' ,� 4�4H. \ \-ENGHvz\ \ \ \ ,,,, _ • a _ V .7� � � � � � \ � \ l� -,��/ \ '—j� i ia% I 4 ICC6P ZFET4LE�4 \ \ J/�—�_ _ �\� ! ® / j jaifb701,0*,.0„,,,- _.,,,-;„:. rA48.-1:5•1t4,. IN. , \\,\,\\\\' ___,,.., \ \ /\ / v- a � ' � 0 ./ , - \ oLr -—:v s O' '41- * MO`I ... -- i \ \ .\ t \ V' � � HYDCoSEE�R2tr� Epi •� �/\ � I' °�` O \ -1 /�� /A� a \ �_�/ ! �' LAWN.MIX P \\_ %�Wfilli�fi �! I-I/�� 4�`` /P '� ,` \ / \ 11��PBGIPIGATION \ a' r? IL / r elp \ —OW ' \C4Wi�i � tir • ' � l Mf TRO1 / \ I � C-� I� II)DDL . \t VOLI&LA� FIR- -- IOW ryilA DEEOANSTIRATI iLANTING. l`� ` � I ` `•,\ '.4, ; \mi l * � 0` • \� �*/ I 'Z'OW6T i _ _ -__ 5t ! = / _� , R— 1.11 ,_ , OO� �i%\� OO /SO � � � e q \a 5_ �� . %: .� S i a 0 �I- ` qIG4) WJ P •-- nr'2Nsrfa ROgo \/ __ / / o PIPE o '.f„tat �lE _ c,. FNZ coNTlOL_ PLE NN(9 AI '- pO°M c '',PLAN 29\_ °EstF R. ::177ETR0 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle °A.E'8-(9-$$ IA'OSCAPERICFITECTS&RRIIERS RENTON DEMONSTRATION �► GRAM CHEMED, SCALE. FILE NO, Osborn &Roy, FOREST PROJECT D.R. F,R. Planners, inc. of00 CONTRACT LAYOUT AND IRRIGATION PLAN 5 a..NIN°No. - - - - No, REVISION o^� law RIDskon way Seattle,wasn��gtan98101 RENTON TREATMENT PLANT .VV... �N G I I iFIN. I - SHEET N0.II OF 14 a - C - G - E ENsa F - G - M A • C /A A A D /111.11 . E A • A - -Mr / H 1 . . I 1 1 . • . • ( . - s . t' ' • - 11. , , ', I, / .. . .. . . .,. 1 . . _ .„„.;„„,,,,,,,,,... • •. .... _.„:,,..,,, „..., ..• . - . . ..4- 4 . ro. . —ffilEXIFIV).A= ; iF •; =MEE -5; . ME .. ,AREA 11(2141 Ririe PLAN ////17:1. 1:i•• NO SCALE = 4 . / . . / . • . . (.../,...--=- _EDO / /y + 7 1- 41 n . : L. I Li— .,\‘' 2 2 v. CDC' . • Hfit,r2ome.t., KITH &F?..A. 2E-t=, 1,11x-TH PENIDNs-nzi\-rioN PLANTIN: / • . 0.4° / Ag.e.4. , E.RVILn Ac.z..S5 KoAt, ANI=> ALL A.R.EAs vii-1.1RSEAD . . . . PURIM& coNsTRuc..TioN eepe... ,. l''EGIFIcATIoN./ • s 7 • 4 OLIThipa . : IP' , , /' i I ,ED,:, • .c.'9 ..."" . .../............‹A. A 4 N. \ 1 ilek Ior4As \ , 1 mpr of / rTh0 0 \......./ on00 \......, 00°0n000nOon00.0n00 1 1 ...._..i . t, 1 . MATCI-ILINe. MATC.RLIN A. ' ; 11 21 PLAN 30. '''.71 80% SUBMITTAL '. gl 10thIONLO-. Tief.METRO LFRDSCFPE FRO-ITECTSE RAMPS RENTON DEMONSTRATION F.R. to.nlelpol.I ty of'MotropoLitan Seattle 8-0-252, DRAW. Osborn &Roy, FOREST PROJECT • • • 1".20'-0" — — — - Planners, inc. - - i RECONVENDEll. LAYOUT, PLAN 6 DRAWING NO. 1 NO. REVISION i BY DATE 1919 Rloshon Wog Scottie.Washington98101 RENTON TREATMENT PLANt JEW. EWE, - - APPROVED. • CONTRACT NO. W/M20-88 • - G 12 ..F.'12 C'14 v V V V V V A C 0 E F G . /' I(9'C4)PIPE •4- • • • ILo� I MATGNL I•- I1mo�. I 1 f t ` ' Eil / I / 111.5 EX. W. Et/OE I PM°E■. ■ • `w c. B —�/N!rt,.K.r. tr.l� / I I // �0 ./ (...+� Si-ALLOW SWALE • i/C :�I I is� AEI�I� / I ` . 122 - 5 _ . IP�i...Li:- IKV 'I!MII I r ��f I . ,. _ // i C / I �� :2, k I ) I I Essid �Es. e(,•i;lil� Ex. x g `�R\1 � /// / / r /-1rI i/ ' �A' PhH `/+'��(�RIPLB \\, UMAI'LE 120 I P_I�Pf�L�Gall pAR4 ' • / �i f /MGc/l ANb I / \ J RKI'a TOM-4 a IZ / e // / // MA H TO OCK -TOP o- / + + Q20)______ + �+ ex.5'I 5Pl c oAT oN ,E MCN7 ► •REV OP�VY 901 PLANe PLAN / /�./ TV ILA GALoN I / ( \ MAPLE t �I I 1 LIAN L V F. ■D SCALE LA . ' / // I Nol¢TH brpm I 1 _�� 5 ' I LNG I F .... • f. , op / I I I37/ iL , ., o Q- + •• / // / Re\"� :it •X ARP' I ' / I + 124_ w►� �P7 ............:. ----- --\ Jr A�Py I I r/1 / / / /+ r c}�'�ass ' \ > ..,w\ I 1 4 :� I ( / I o / l \ /20) ' CIi / ,�� _ �`i,,:�- Y��1 I I I 1 1. Ei90o - / l,lr ,-_J N /(�12 \ - /7, �� /'�a ,/ -'�\` \ \..� 1.1% J 1 \\. ► --"--(/ / , , 7/ 3 /' j1 / * ;r;:.:. ' t // /_�—` NOTE�i• PIO PAVEME 9 ) ,... ,7,1 , / I - / � .�OF 1JORK LIMIT•�LIN6 yw.W AT FIJL�� T ti( f '''''.,1... ' #Ra' T� BB,REMOVEP,PER ELE)/'TION c .dD P4 .o::�..R.`�Q;:' 132 �i23 SPE CIFIGATIOTJ\6. \ 3 hIDRK LIMIT/LINE .j/>�"'"��y -,:A '�°• - 2:5EERATH NO.�fbl'S�•. �' j( a 1 I L a P�3 `•.F R FATHULANOAiN[y Gcll I � 0. . _ y, _ .::..::.+..:.» k Y�2li/' LoLATIDN�. `. I 'I i . / i / '�.. \I7 1>.,.. - D. 143.1422 \ /j--�� ,_ r Pz .._ ko.., I`e I •/ -PG=xoo.828G `` \� �, `\ 1 ''?^ `H1 ,GZ1 �� pr.506.5265, , •'� -� • �r' �r 3G0.271Cr _ e .. _ • \\ / � _ \ I ! 138 x/ ix l42 r;,'£f��+.ppe p� I \ • 1 2 \ C711 7/ ._1— &to -_ _ I • ENO 0\ r l / '... 1 - _ 7 , ,' ".; -2'1'/ - ;-, ----- /x ..'.. , ii *:., /F \ \\ \ —� ! 11:� l • / � � / / / / w PG=3Z2ob9 1 \` / ,�,//�//__ 'f •/ ! _: G1��::1 ID'3.5. \\ pT=J��7y¢g //Z/' // __�`+ X x /4 :r.. p :, :::/4�5 \,:< L 6.N388B.4GSG 1 ► w.,� SOUNbA RY �_ �� _/ - e —/ 1 1 P 1247�4$$ �, /� ..i �`N 6LAP AND 7` --„-`'\Cf: - j I x `;'.� =T B,ob.81Z [a\ I �� .� /// IR (O/iTION6EE -I-- _ 4' —l/ 1' / .': IYYYb. 111 \ / / SP-A/,' IONE, �APPRO>\\ Y �_/— / / I Y�I / \\ �� .`Y / EN A GEMEN �I{ CONFI6uRAT10'�� ((41) 3 1I 15¢0\ \� NOTE �f //� L ND3LAPING AND / ZONE 2-027 �, /-- /i ' 148I (50 /, ' ` \ ,l {�_ IR IGATION / r /` _/� / �( T'!G2 ‘AA\ \ /5E 6HEET G4 FOR �'GE TRp ! iONTRALTOR D VERIFY EXISTS NGE� / ¢ /GRADING Goo2DINATE�. - LaLA71• OF HEA�s ANP �EX. a."G✓cSR6 / / \�� \� �� (HI() X \ 15i/\ `�/ 1 • WORK LIMIT LINE ,,,,(((( "�•.Clil `) / To R A.V., 9T ' l 4`�/ix [�4G) \. .�R�� 0rt9a.......a"c,•....'.: . ..',':'?:. ZIIT AP APPKOPRIATE` jN�O�CoROUNv 1 PIP 5 RT- ITH • bl•JTLR� P> G7 I (I 8) n - v` �i' AIg A 52,L / / ITHIN THB trf(IPLINE / -_ • /x ) `�°) 154 , iMrr 4 c4)E I4G.0 -. \M.5 ti/Orys CONETK.U6-110 , AG'" / �_ / u 146 MATGHLINE 0 -__ TERR04o o �-- -- _ _ _ — / /^� / / c/ PIPE / ! ATGHLIN- ---� \ 90% 9 A BMITT/ L/ ( ==I N .LAN 28\ MEIER. LHTICAPEFFEHTECISERFNNIES • RENTON DEMONSTRATION E R. :�: M m METRO IIDIpeLity of M.tropoLlt 5.wttL. '"'E'e-/9-$a pEC[FD. 'YALE. gLE,O. Osborn&Roy, FOREST PROJECT F.R. I"=20'-0" oa.Alw0 N Planners, inc. NM �, GRADING PLAN 2 1414 Hlosko,W o Scottie. oshrc�[on981D1 RENTON TREATMENT PLANT „�, _ G 5- BEVISIov By DATE - .vnNOVED� 1 110 �' W/M20-BB ' 5 14 _ _c"D NGq a• E • 414, 1... xne wee yaw, " B C D E • F G H A A B A C A D A E A F A G A H • \-- 0 _INDER TO SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS I BASE • GRADING LAYOUT 5 0 \ NUMBER I NUMBER LAN NG DRAWING 5 0 I i y \ 74 I NU I G7 i \ T 20 1 ESIOMA RATION \ \ I ND I G8 tO �� PE.MoNA.RE:A WITH / - 21 NU I G9 ► � 1j � CONTROL AI¢EA •` \ \ 28 - I G4 I G10' D011L,LA6 FIR IN vJ 17EMONT1?ATION I I II � i / �Y / 29 I G5 I G11 AREA WITH � I �� CONTROL:AREA I �7 - 1� 1' II yTh\ 1 30 I G6 I G12 // I a„\ \ / NU - NOT USED \fr _ --- -/ jI I 4 1 \ I. i \\‘‘ss‘ _ -::-_--- -• !lam \--r-.-------e:p----- �� ) , -=:------ I ', 3 `J I I� 3 11 J / ii 0\ // ao %7 /' 1 \ I1 /%ER. PATH i / • // 2 /r 2 \ . _ --\ \\ /,, ,_\I--.' ,.1.____,_,?-: \ :3_____________ ____— --\ I, '/ -- -1 c---,,-—s—A..,'; _... _.._:._..____ _.,.._ __,..——_—_—.\--_.- v I i, \ . \ A_ 4\---- 1:(\ S , ______\__ \>\.;\ __ ,-r)\,(\ ,,'\ _ 2 .,', \. ,' i"�' ___------- ` lS/mil\/ - J k-- ' ( 1 (_ 90% SUBMITTAL • IFYI[Y�CFIPE Hi?RKi5ERF1WU1s RENTON DEMONSTRATION MAW.. F.R. ��METROMI.,ICIpa lty of M.tropoL I tan s.ottL. DATE. °""a C E s , IOWFILE No. Osborn &Roy, FOREST PROJECT D.R. M.W. Planners, Inc. �`• ,AEI�, MASTER SITE PLAN AND INDEX R"IG3 CI) 1414_amskoe way.Seoul¢.ubsbo91oo96101 _- - RENTON TREATMENT PLANT uvnovEo• - -- __ E* 3°f 14 lg. _ _ _ REvlslw BY BUM -W/M20-8B V V - V BC D E F G H • \ A ® • • C O E F • O • H IIr. n O � �'� �� • \ PUGET SOUND , 9 i � ,, ,•''' 1 BAINBRIDGE '' Z \\ %% \\ . ISLAND• �\ 3�1 ' \\ \\ as // \\ • ;' �f Q�\ \ s�i /% RENTON CITY LIMITS �� \\` B • _ `� ;a \*9• \ \ • // /BLACK Ads' // ANC �_ BR MERTON 1 ` '\ 17 ''' v '' '..\\ \\ \r1OTONUMFr ��j /p —�`IyE� l \ ��O��°RN,. 4 ,/ . a \..l `` .\\e\ • \ \\ g OAKESDALE R0, 1fF % \ r - l / SW 7�ST'( o !� F • , ISLAND ` � .. WORK /% \\ `KTNGCOUNTY I • �4 / ,% � \ CITY OFTUKWILA \\ / RENTON DEMONSTRATION N \� / O RENTON SOREST EWAGE \JECT \�yo 3 • \ TREATMENT PLANT S \` TACOMA \y Nib `I v I,i. I \\ / \\�'�' SW ,,, ,,\. g'A / J G /. \�\\ \ \ O p00 O 00� SW Go ' i, )__ II / \ % O O O 11 - C15>\sIi.....-- 3 '�-- PUYALLUP• SCALE® y' ç/ ; N \ ` \�\`� Q O ' II I �� 0 1 2 4 6 oa rW I •VNITY MAP \ F N ACRES ORIVE\\ l II7 \\ I I SWHST1RDSTI• / 112 C ,\\ \\\ ® _ Z _ \�` 3 4 Io o o • �� Z ( ''' .i;-' ' I o LONGACRES ix z a RACE \ • / i\ I = TRACK \ z m / 70 1 I/ 2r \ 1\ LOCATION MAP 1 7 Z \ (SCALE I"=400' 0 re • — i f( 0O% SUBMITTAL IFAT FULL NOT ONE SIZE NCH z SCALE ACCORDINGLY TSEr RENTON DEMONSTRATION- �•0,�0 a METRO Mmddp•11b of MweopOlMmSeattle °A"B-19 as Eg Osborn&Roy, FOREST PROJECT o AS SHOWN PIM N _ Planners, inc._ 'ECOAAA"G•G LOCATION AND VICINITY -MAPS$ -Gommel.i+am $ - V „ima Way Scottie.U. A Q8OI RENTON TREATMENT PLANT - G 2 i' •O •e11e1 ON IT GAT[ .. _. _..----_ - _-- ' ' 2OF 14 g . .m ..... A • v . C . D E vFv O H. CITY OF RENTON ,,T. . i.1.,. FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk May 11, 1989 Ms. Susan Solberg METRO 821 2nd Avenue M/S 66 Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: TREATMENT PLANT/FOREST DEMONSTRATION SA/SP-085-88 - METRO APPEAL Dear Ms. Solberg: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of May 1, 1989 adopted the attached Planning and Development Committee report. The report concurred in your request of April 17th to postpone indefinitely the forest/silviculture demonstration project. The official file is now closed. Please feel free to contact this office if you have any questions. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk Attachment cc: Don Erickson • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 Facsimile r206) 235-2513 4`! M , 1, 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Page 123 Item 8.f. Mayor Clymer reappointed Daniel Sullivan, 3000 NE 5th Place, Renton, to Appointment: Library the Library Board for five-year term to expire 5/31/94. MOVED BY Board STREDICKE, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE MAYOR'S REAPPOINTMENT. CARRIED. Item 8.g. Parks Director John Webley introduced Vince Lee, newly selected project Parks: Senior Housing manager for the senior housing development. Mr. Lee reviewed Item 8.g., Development Parks Department request for review of consultant agree-in-grit for site selection of senior housing bond issue project in the amount of $44,000 and authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the contract. Also requested was referral of project to Community Services Committee to facilitate submittal of periodic status reports and Council action items during project development. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE CONTRACT FOR SITE SELECTION CONSULTANT SERVICES. Upon inquiry, it was noted that both the Housing Authority and Steering Committee have reviewed and recommended approval of the contract. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER OF SENIOR HOUSING TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING AND PERIODIC REPORT TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. Upon Council inquiry, Mr. Webley indicated he will explain the selection process in a memorandum to Council. CORRESPONDENCE Letter was read from David and Katrina Miller, 2064 Ilwaco Avenue NE, Utility: Miller Water Renton, requesting approval of water service connection to Summerwind Service Connection watermain in the City to serve proposed residence at 10403 147th Avenue SE, Request Renton, in King County, due to high cost of extending service from the County water main east of the site. Also requested was permission for King County Fire District 25 or the Renton Fire Department to use the city hydrant located a few feet northwest of the property. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO UTILITIES COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President Stredicke presented a report recommending adoption of the Committee of the Whole following proposed Renton projects as priorities in the 1989 County-Wide Parks: 1989 County-Wide Trails and Open Space Bond Issue: Trails and Open Space Bond Issue 1. Priority. 1: Cedar River Trail System Development (Renton Civic Center to eastern city limits at Jones road). 2. Priority 2: Combined Honey Creek and abandoned Pacific Railroad right-of-way trails acquisition and development project (Renton). 3. Priority 3: Springbrook trail corridor and open space acquisition project (from Talbot Road east along Springbrook Creek to the Springbrook wetland). 4. Priority 4: Lake Washington waterfront and viewpoint acquisition and development project (Renton). Total cost of projects: $2,529,536.00. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL APPROVE THE PRIORITY LIST. CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Reed presented a report Development Committee regarding the appeal of the METRO site approval and special permit. The Appeal: METRO Site report indicated receipt of a letter from the applicant of the Renton Approval and Conditional Treatment Plant/Forest Demonstration Project stating that the project has Use Permit, SA-085-88, been postponed indefinitely and requesting that the file be closed until a later SP-085-88 date. No further action by Council is necessary. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Councilwoman Mathews indicated that staff is preparing the Routine Vegetation Management Permit application and fee schedule for review by Council prior to referral to Ways and Means Committee. Planning: Land Clearing Planning and Development Committee Chairman Reed presented a report and Tree Cutting regarding the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance. The City Council Ordinance held a public hearing on the ordinance on February 20, 1989. Upon the close of the public hearing, the ordinance was referred back to the Committee. The Committee met on March 22 and April 27 to consider the ordinance. After substantial discussion with staff and input from interested parties, the Committee directed changes to the hearing draft. The Planning and • Development Committee recommended that Council refer the amended ordinance to the Ways and Means Committee. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE - REPORT. CARRIED. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT MAY 1, 1989 RENTON TREATMENT PLANT/FOREST DEMONSTRATION PROJECT PROJECT NO's SA-085-88 and SP-085-88 (Metro Appeal) jReferred 1/9/89) The applicant has submitted a letter which states the project has been postponed indefinitely (see attached) . No further Council action is necessary. / rG� ohn Reed, Chair Nancy Ma ews, Vice-Chair /d64-1-‘ - k(Lef2,- _, Kathy eolker-Wheeler, Member • Cc : . prig!r r r 7 y f METRO • • „ Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • ttle, A 98104-1598 (\14 April 17, 1989 '41} RECEIVED ,i APR 1 9 989 CITY OF REN,UN Mr. John Reed, Chairman CITY COUNCIL Planning and Development Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Renton Treatment Plant/Forest Demonstration Project Project No's. SA-085-88 and SP-085-88 Dear Mr. Reed: By this letter, Metro would like to inform the City of Renton that the Forest Demonstration Project has been postponed indefinitely.. We wish to' thank you for the time and effort your committee devoted to the clarification of the Hearing Examiner's Condition #2 to the project. Metro would appreciate having the file closed with the Hearing Examiner's clarification included, so that if the project was to go forward at a later time, all correspondence and decisions rendered to date would be available. Again, thank you for your efforts in our behalf. Very truly yours, diLa-44c-13141-1 Susan Solberg Right-of-Way Supervisor SS:gjg cc: Ms. Jeanette Samik-McKague, City of Renton • L\GJ417-4 -*METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 April 17 , 1989 Mr. John Reed, Chairman Planning and Development Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Renton Treatment Plant/Forest Demonstration Project Project No's. SA-085-88 and SP-085-88 Dear Mr. Reed: By this letter, Metro would like to inform the City of Renton that the Forest Demonstration Project has been postponed indefinitely. We wish to thank you for the time and effort your committee devoted to the clarification of the Hearing Examiner's Condition #2 to the project. 0 Metro would appreciate having the file closed with the Hearing Examiner's clarification included, so that if the project was to go forward at a later time, all correspondence and decisions rendered to date would be available. Again, thank you for your efforts in our behalf. Very truly. yours, AS,Gfat . Susan Solberg Right-of-Way Supervisor SS:gjg cc: Ms. Jeanette Samik-McKague, City of Renton L\GJ417-4 u � eZv� j i/ V a 0 CITY OF RENTON "11 HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman C John Reed, Chairman Planning and Development Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Metro Appeal SA-085-88 and SP-085-88 Your Letter of March 7, 1989 Dear Mr. Reed: This office finds that the Council interpretation of the decision on the above entitled matter comports with the intent of establishing a more formal method of monitoring the rookery. If this office can be of any further assistance please feel free to write. Sincerely, 7Z111 FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER • CITY OF RENTON MAR 9 1989 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 ti D CITY OF RENTON N THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL Earl Clymer, Mayor March 7, 1989 ` , NED Mr. Fred Kaufman MAR 1989 Land Use Hearing Examiner ��TON City of Renton Renton, Washington K"a„e,y-a EXAMINER Re: Metro Appeal of File No. SA-085-88 and SP-085-88 Dear Mr. Kaufman: The Planning and Development Committee met with the applicant (Metro) on February 23 , 1989 to consider its appeal. The Committee was unclear of the intent or meaning of Condition No. 2 of your decision, dated December 5, 1988 . The Committee interpreted this condition to mean that the applicant will draft an agreement with the City of Renton to monitor the rookery. The condition could allow for an agreement between First City Equities and Metro, And further, the agreement should allow for some monitoring plan to assure that the Heron rookery is not affected by trucks hauling fill to the site. The staff was also asked to investigate the documentation on the effect of GROCO on the food chain to assure its safety. The Committee is requesting that you advise us whether our interpretation is in concurrence with your intent and meaning. If not, the Committee asks that you send a letter clarifying your intent and meaning of Condition No. 2 . The Committee would appreciate an expedited response. j • John Reed, Chairman Planning and Development Committee JR:bd PADLTR.DOC Inn NAM A _ D none inneN January 9, 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Page 5 than his own. He also claimed that the site is served by sewers provided through an LID which has now been paid. Council discussion was held regarding timeliness of the rezone and surrounding uses. Vice-Chairman Stredicke clarified that all of the B-1 zoned property located south of NE 44th Street is undeveloped and business property to the north is not in proximity to the subject site. Mr. Brandt pointed out that property to the west has been developed as a light industrial use and development of the subject site cannot be developed without a rezone. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. ROLL CALL: 3 AYES: STREDICKE, TRIMM, KEOLKER-WHEELER. 2 NAYS: REED, NELSON. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. ,Claim: Thomas, CL-59-88 Claim for damages in the amount of $233.23 filed by Robert Thomas, 446 Windsor Way NE, Renton, for damage to vehicle allegedly incurred when car hit uncovered manhole on NE 12th Street east of Duvall Avenue NE (12/19/88). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Washington Claim for damages in the amount of $214.18 filed by Washington Natural Natural Gas, CL-58-88 Gas, P.O. Box 1869, Seattle, for broken gas line allegedly caused by City negligence (10/03/88). 'Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Moore, CL-60-88 Claim for damages in the amount of $43.19 filed by Wade Moore, 18052 42nd Avenue S., Seattle, for damage to vehicle allegedly caused by hitting pothole in roadway at Lake Washington Boulevard and NE 44th Street (11/4/88). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Wilson, CL-61-88 Claim for damages in the amount of $2,156.00 filed by Malcolm Bell, P.O. Box 66416, Seattle, attorney for Robert Wilson, alleging loss of cellular telephone while jailed due to City negligence (3/9/88). Refer to City. Attorney and insurance service. Claim: DuBois, CL-62-88 Claim for damages in the amount of $22,066.79 filed by Peggi DuBois, 2907 Mt. View Avenue N., Renton, for flood damage to basement allegedly caused by failure of City to block side sewer while flushing main sewer line (3/8/88). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Appeal; METRO Site Appeal of hearing examiner's decision filed by METRO for site approval and Approval and Conditional special permit to develop a silviculture demonstration project at the METRO Use Permit, SA-085-88, Treatment Plant at Oakesdale Avenue and SW 7th Street, File No. SA-085-88, SP-085-88 SP-085-88. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Appointment: Municipal Mayor Clymer reappointed the following individuals as Municipal Court Court Judges Pro Tern Judges Pro Tern for one-year terms to expire on 12/31/89: Robert Anderson, 111 Williams Avenue S.; Peter Banks, 321 Burnett Avenue S.; James Cayce, P.O. Box 798; Kameron Cayce, 410 Burnett Avenue S.; Frank Davidson, P.O. Box 59; Charles Delaurenti, 3407 NE 2nd Street; Gary Faull, 321 Burnett Avenue S.; Deborah Fleck, 311 Morris Avenue S.; Richard Jackson, 111 Williams Avenue S.; Bob McBeth, 3407 NE 2nd Street; and Dave Tracy, 321 Burnett Avenue S., Suite 102 (all Renton addresses). Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Appointment: Civil Mayor Clymer reappointed Vere Thompson, 1307 S. 9th Street, Renton, to a Service Commission six-year term on the Civil Service Commission to expire on 12/31/94. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Zoning: Annual Adoption Planning Division requested public hearing be set on 1/23/89 for Council to of Map consider adoption of the annual zoning map. Council concur. Police: Revolver Police Department requested replacement of 70 Smith & Wesson revolvers Replacement with 70 semi-automatic pistols and holsters to be offered at cost and with trade-in allowance by manufacturer due to defective barrels. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. CAG: 87-007, Kennydale Public Works/Utility Engineering Division submitted CAG-007-87, Sewer Project Kennydale Sewer Line Improvements; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $52,012.32, commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $7,643.52 to contractor, Grant Construction Co., if all required releases have been received. Council concur. %0 CITY OF RENTON "LL FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk December 30, 1988 APPEAL FILED BY SUSAN SOLBERG REPRESENTING METRO RE: Appeal of hearing examiner's decision, dated December 5, 1988, regarding site approval and special permit requests filed by METRO, file no. SA-085-88 and SP-085-88. To parties of record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the hearing examiner's decision on the referenced matter has been filed with the city clerk, along with the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee, and the recommendation of the Committee will be considered by the City Council at a subsequent Council meeting. The council secretary will notify all parties of record either by mail or telephone of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish to be notified of the meeting, please call the council secretary at 235-2586 any weekday after 1:00 p.m. for information. Sincerely, Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206).235-2501 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 December 16, 1988 CITY OF RENTON DEC 1 9 1988 Mr. Fred J. Kaufman RECEIVED Hearing Examiner CITY CLERK'S OFFICE City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Renton Treatment Plant - Silviculture Demonstration Project File No. : SA-085-88, SP-085-88 Dear Mr. Kaufman: By this letter, the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (Metro) is appealing condition number two of your decision approving our applications for a special permit to fill and grade the site and site plan approval. It is the belief of Metro that this condition is ambiguous and excessive when the following facts are considered: 1. The environmental review for this project resulted in the issuance of a Declaration of Nonsignificance (DNS) . The DNS means that the project will not produce any impacts that are damaging to the environment or which will not be mitigated by the project. The City of Renton has not questioned the lead agency determination. 2 . The condition requires Metro to draft an agreement to monitor the rookery both as to disturbance and to possible contamination. The staff report issued on November 16, 1988 states that the rookery is being monitored already. The requirement for Metro to monitor the rookery appears to be a duplication of the existing monitoring. 3 . The condition is unclear as to what type of monitoring the City is expecting Metro to do. Is the City suggesting monitoring by a member of the Audubon Society or by a biologist. Is the plan to include water quality monitoring? 4. The condition requires that the agreement be approved by a research biologist with expertise in heron and toxicology. To date, Metro has not been able to locate a biologist that has expertise in both fields, however, Metro contacted Dr. Steve West, University of Washington, College of Forestry Resources with 15 years of experience in monitoring the impacts on sludge on small mammals. He felt given the small size of Metro's project as compared with the recent construction of Oakesdale Road that monitoring would be inconclusive without substantial statistical data to use as reference and that without the data it Mr. Fred J. Kaufman December 16, 1988 Page Two would not be possible to determine if the herons were being disturbed by Metro's project. He did not feel that the herons would suffer from contamination from the use of Groco because the project site will be mowed and small mammals are unlikely to proliferate. 5. The distance between Metro's project and the rookery is approximately 1,600 feet which exceeds the buffer requirements of federal and state agencies, including U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) , Washington Department of Wildlife (WDW) , Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) , and Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) for other projects. The City staff report say experts contacted by the City staff confirmed that the project is probably far enough away from the rookery so as to not have any effect during the mating and nesting season. Physically, the rookery is separated from Metro's project by Oakesdale Road. It is felt that it will be difficult to separate the noise from vehicles on Oakesdale Road from that of vehicles on Metro's property. 6. Since the condition requires approval by an expert in toxicology, it seems to imply that the heron will be affected by contaminates from the project. Metro will be using Groco as a soil enhancer on the two and half acre project. Groco, a commercially available product, has undergone an environmental review and has been approved by the Health Department. It should be noted that the entire treatment plant site has been landscaped with Groco under a landscaping plan already approved by the City. Since Metro's project can be compared to a demonstration landscape project and will be maintained as a cultivated area, it is unlikely that the type of mammals the herons feed on will be found in this area. Metro's appeal of this condition should not be interpreted as a lack of concern for the heron rookery. Metro has and will continue to be sensitive to the environment. Very truly yours, hts.1-et/L..),7• $1-01-1-6-41`r--- Susan M. Solberg, SR/WA Right of Way Supervisor SMS:cg SMS1209 cc: Mr. Richard Sandaas Ms. Suzanne Schweitzer Mr. Larry Adeyemi Ms. Roberta King %• CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk December 30, 1988 APPEAL FILED BY SUSAN SOLBERG REPRESENTING METRO RE: Appeal of hearing examiner's decision, dated December 5, 1988, regarding site approval and special permit requests filed by METRO, file no. SA-085-88 and SP-085-88. To parties of record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the hearing examiner's decision on the referenced matter has been filed with the city clerk, along with the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee, and the recommendation of the Committee will be considered by the City Council at a subsequent Council meeting. The council secretary will notify all parties of record either by mail or telephone of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish to be notified of the meeting, please call the council secretary at 235-2586 any weekday after 1:00 p.m. for information. Sincerely, Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 ilmir METRO- Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 December 16, 1988 CITY OF RENTON DEC 1 9 1988 Mr. Fred J. Kaufman RECEIVED Hearing Examiner CITY CLERK'S OFFICE City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Renton Treatment Plant - Silviculture De monstration Project File No. : SA-085-88, SP-085-88 Dear Mr. Kaufman: By this letter, the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (Metro) is appealing condition number two of your decision approving our applications for a special permit to fill and grade the site and site plan approval. It is the belief of Metro that this condition is ambiguous and excessive when the following facts are considered: 1. The environmental review for this project resulted in the issuance of a Declaration of Nonsignificance (DNS) . The DNS means that the project will not produce any impacts that are damaging to the environment or which will not be mitigated by the project. The City of Renton has not questioned the lead agency determination. 2 . The condition requires Metro to draft an agreement to monitor the rookery both as to disturbance and to possible contamination. The staff report issued on November 16,. 1988 states that the rookery is being monitored already. The requirement for Metro to monitor the rookery appears to be a duplication of the existing monitoring. 3. The condition is unclear as to what type of monitoring the City is expecting Metro to do. Is the City suggesting monitoring by a member of the Audubon Society or by a biologist. Is the plan to include water quality monitoring? 4. The condition requires that the agreement be approved by a research biologist with expertise in heron and toxicology. To date, Metro has not been able to locate a biologist that has expertise in both fields, however, Metro contacted Dr. Steve West, University of Washington, College of Forestry Resources with 15 years of experience in monitoring the impacts on sludge on small mammals. He felt given the small size of Metro's project as compared with the recent construction of Oakesdale Road that monitoring would be inconclusive without substantial statistical data to use as reference and that without the data it Mr. Fred J. Kaufman December 16, 1988 Page Two would not be possible to determine if the herons were being disturbed by Metro's project. He did not feel that the herons would suffer from contamination from the use of Groco because the project site will be mowed and small mammals are unlikely to proliferate. 5. The distance between Metro's project and the rookery is approximately 1,600 feet which exceeds the buffer requirements of federal and state agencies, including U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) , Washington Department of Wildlife (WDW) , Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) , and Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) for other projects. The City staff report say experts contacted by the City staff confirmed that the project is probably far enough away from the rookery so as to not have any effect during the mating and nesting season. Physically, the rookery is separated from Metro's project by Oakesdale Road. It is felt that it will be difficult to separate the noise from vehicles on Oakesdale Road from that of vehicles on Metro's property. 6. Since the condition requires approval by an expert in toxicology, it seems to imply that the heron will be affected by contaminates from the project. Metro will be using Groco as a soil enhancer on the two and half acre project. Groco, a commercially available product, has undergone an environmental review and has been approved by the Health Department. It should be noted that the entire treatment plant site has been landscaped with Groco under a landscaping plan already approved by the City. Since Metro's project can be compared to a demonstration landscape project and will be maintained as a cultivated area, it is unlikely that the type of mammals the herons feed on will be found in this area. Metro's appeal of this condition should not be interpreted as a lack of concern for the heron rookery. Metro has and will continue to be sensitive to the environment. Very truly yours, J�JLc��v 2-i7 Susan M. Solberg, SR/WA Right of Way Supervisor SMS:cg SMS1209 cc: Mr. Richard Sandaas Ms. Suzanne Schweitzer Mr. Larry Adeyemi Ms. Roberta King CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: 01/09/89 Dept/Div/Board.. Finance/City Clerk Staff Contact.. M. Petersen AGENDA STATUS: Consent X SUBJECT: Appeal of hearing examiner's Public Hearing decision on the METRO request for Correspondence site approval and special permit, Ordinance file no. SA-085-88 and SP-085-88 Resolution Old Business EXHIBITS: City clerk's letter New Business Letter of appeal Study Session Hearing examiner's report, 12/5/88 Other RE�COMMENDED ACTION: I APPROVALS: Refer to Planning & Development Committee I Legal Dept I Finance Dept I Other FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.. mount Budgeted Revenue Generated... SUMMARY OF ACTION: �$ 0 CITY OF RENTON 1.41. FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk December 30,1988 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss COUNTY OF KING ) MARILYN J. PETERSEN, Deputy City Clerk for the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 30th of December, 1988, at the hour of 5:00 p.m., your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail to all parties of record, notice of appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision filed by METRO, File No. SA-085-88 and SP-085-88. Marilyn J. ren, Deputy City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 16th day of December, 1988. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 0. CITY OF RENTON "LL FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk December 30, 1988 APPEAL FILED BY SUSAN SOLBERG REPRESENTING METRO RE: Appeal of hearing examiner's decision, dated December 5, 1988, regarding site approval and special permit requests filed by METRO, file no. SA-085-88 and SP-085-88. To parties of record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the hearing examiner's decision on the referenced matter has been filed with the city clerk, along with the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee, and the recommendation of the Committee will be considered by the City Council at a subsequent Council meeting. The council secretary will notify all parties of record either by mail or telephone of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish to be notified of the meeting, please call the council secretary at 235-2586 any weekday after 1:00 p.m. for information. Sincerely, Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 • • • CITY OF RENTON o N. • 30203 :, FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTON, WAS HINGTOV 98055 I ' 19 19 C--CP° INA:C:Nrt) RECEIYED OF Tfzr i t:r op/Ya I — Sit- 09, •5.. FF SP —o,P 'SS--- J • ' • • TOTAL 75 6U Received by _ - - - •,ivy,' _ - _ •:.J`u • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ;s+= :.r it MEETRO • • Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 December 16, 1988 CITY OF RENTON DEC 1 9 1988 Mr. Fred J. Kaufman RECEIVED Hearing Examiner CITY CLERK'S OFFICE City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Renton Treatment Plant - Silviculture Demonstration Project File No. : SA-085-88, SP-085-88 Dear Mr. Kaufman: By this letter, the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (Metro) is appealing condition number two of your decision approving our applications for a special permit to fill and grade the site and site plan approval. It is the belief of Metro that this condition is ambiguous and excessive when the following facts are considered: 1. The environmental review for this project resulted in the issuance of a Declaration of Nonsignificance (DNS) . The DNS means that the project will not produce any impacts that are damaging to the environment or which will not be mitigated by the project. The City of Renton has not questioned the lead agency determination. 2 . The condition requires Metro to draft an agreement to monitor the rookery both as to disturbance and to possible contamination. The staff report issued on November 16, 1988 states that the rookery is being monitored already. The requirement for Metro to monitor the rookery appears to be a duplication of the existing monitoring. 3 . The condition is unclear as to what type of monitoring the City is expecting Metro to do. Is the City suggesting monitoring by a member of the Audubon Society or by a biologist. Is the plan to include water quality monitoring? 4. The condition requires that the agreement be approved by a research biologist with expertise in heron and toxicology. To date, Metro has not been able to locate a biologist that has expertise in both fields, however, Metro contacted Dr. Steve West, University of Washington, College of Forestry Resources with 15 years of experience in monitoring the impacts on sludge on small mammals. He felt given the small size of Metro's project as compared with the recent construction of Oakesdale Road that monitoring would be inconclusive without substantial statistical data to use as reference and that without the data it i - Mr. Fred J. Kaufman December 16, 1988 Page Two would not be possible to determine if the herons were being disturbed by Metro's project. He did not feel that the herons would suffer from contamination from the use of Groco because the project site will be mowed and small mammals are unlikely to proliferate. 5. The distance between Metro' s project and the rookery is approximately 1, 600 feet which exceeds the buffer requirements of federal and state agencies, including U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) , Washington Department of Wildlife (WDW) , Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) , and Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) for other projects. The City staff report say experts contacted by the City staff confirmed that the project is probably far enough away from the rookery so as to not have any effect during the mating and nesting season. Physically, the rookery is separated from Metro's project by Oakesdale Road. It is felt that it will be difficult to separate the noise from vehicles on Oakesdale Road from that of .vehicles on Metro's property. 6. Since the condition requires approval by an expert in toxicology, it seems to imply that the heron will be affected by contaminates from the project. Metro will be using Groco as a soil enhancer on the two and half acre project. Groco, a commercially available product, has undergone an environmental review and has been approved by the Health Department. It should be noted that the entire treatment plant site has been landscaped with Groco under a landscaping plan already approved by the City. Since Metro' s project can be compared to a demonstration landscape project and will be maintained as a cultivated area, it is unlikely that the type of mammals the herons feed on will be found in this area. Metro's appeal of this condition should not be interpreted as a lack of concern for the heron rookery. Metro has and will continue to be sensitive to the environment. Very truly yours, dataatv7-2? • JAUL4lyc--- Susan M. Solberg, SR/WA Right of Way Supervisor SMS:cg SMS1209 cc: Mr. Richard Sandaas Ms. Suzanne Schweitzer Mr. Larry Adeyemi Ms. Roberta King AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 5th day of December , 1988 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 0— day of 1988 (7-21 • Notary Publ c and for the State of Washington, residing at , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: METRO - SA-085-88 and SP-085-88 (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) if . I • December 5, 1988 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: METRO File No.: SA-085-88, SP-085-88 LOCATION: Renton Sewage Treatment Plant at Oakesdale Avenue and SW 7th Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval of a Site Plan to allow the development of a silviculture demonstration project at the Metro Treatment Plant to illustrate the effects of sludge fertilizer on tree growth through the planting of Douglas Fir and hybrid Poplars, to show the differences in the growth rates between trees fertilized with sludge and those grown without sludge. The sludge medium is GROCO consisting of three parts sawdust and one part sludge: The applicant has also applied for a Fill and Grade Permit to allow the importation of 29,500 cubic yards of material consisting of Indianola-type sand and GROCO mix. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on November 15, 1988 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES • The hearing was opened on November 22, 1988 at 10:30 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Map showing project area Exhibit #4 - Larger scale Vicinity Map Exhibit #5 - Landscape Plan Exhibit #6 - Construction document extract showing landscaping on Monster Road and Oakesdale Avenue, for illustrative purposes only. The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Zoning, Administrator, Don Erickson. In his report Mr. Erickson noted the proposal by Metro is to set up a demonstration to promote the use of Groco and show the public the difference in growth rates between trees fertilized with sludge (sludge which is 3 parts sawdust and one part sludge called Groco) and those not. Access to this site is off Monster Road; a review was given of surrounding uses in the area; current zoning on the site was approved in December of 1986. Erickson noted concerns by the King County Health Department regarding the water lines on the site with the introduction of sludge material over them causing possible increased pressure on the lines and possible contaminates from the sludge filtering into the system. • • Metro • SA-085-88, SP-085-88 December 5, 1988 Page 2 These concerns have been incorporated into the departmental recommendations. Mr. Erickson said the amount of fill should be approximately 29,500 cubic yards coming onto the site. Continuing, it was noted staff feels this proposal conforms to the Comprehensive Plan, odor may be a concern to be dealt with, traffic impacts are minimal with the main traffic to be generated from the hauling of the fill material and not from the visitors to the demonstration site. Erickson said the site is over 600 ft. from Springbrook Creek and contains a depression as well as slopes. The sludge is expected to run off into a basin on the site; there will be improved landscaping on the northwest property line with the on-going project on the west and eastern portions of the site to be enhanced with landscaped screening thereby adding to the property values in the area; there are no vehicle and pedestrian circulation problems or problems with public services. Referring to the Special Permit request it was noted there will be the addition of 29,500 cubic yards of material to the site. The movement of the material is not expected to impact traffic in the area with an anticipated 1475 on-site trips, 7 trips per day during the hours of 7:00 A.M. - 7:00 P.M.. The site if felt to be far enough from the P-1 Channel forebay so as not to cause concern with possible contaminants in the fill, and far enough from heron rookeries not to disturb their activity during mating and nesting season. Various State departments have submitted comments on the proposal but none were detrimental or conditioned. Mr. Erickson stated with the.facts as presented to staff, it is their recommendation that this request be approved q subject to the applicant supplementing landscaping on areas along adjacent roadways near the north and west property lines; work out appropriate haul routes with city staff; work out a plan that would address any potential adverse impacts to the heron rookery during the construction phase of this proposal; and that the applicant not locate the demonstration area directly over water supply lines. Jerri Jackson, Metro, Mail Stop 66, 821 Second Avenue, Seattle, 98104 testified in support for the applicant. Ms. Jackson reviewed the ERC checklist and questions raised by staff regarding it's comments. She stated originally the proposal was to use straight sludge but after talking with other departments decided to change the project to use Groco which is composted material rather than sludge and will have no odor or other problems associated with the sludge treatment. Roberta King, Metro, Mail Stop 81, 821 Second Avenue, Seattle, 98104 clarified the procedure to be used on the site. She stated it was decided to plant the trees in a compost material rather than the sludge (which must sit on the ground for quite a while to age); and reviewed the Groco process and it's various uses stating contaminants are minimal. She said the introduction of other contaminants such as metals into the utility system would be minimal as the product is diluted with sawdust and is a clean sludge. She said research has been done to find the effects of animals feeding on trees treated with this product and no adverse impacts have been cited; there will be one (1) 6 inch application of the Groco material on the site which will be disced into the top 6 inches of the soil and the 800 cu. yds. per acre should provide enough nutrients over the years so the compost will create a type of time- release system; there should be no problems with drainage. Ms. King said there would be public tours conducted on the site; irrigation will be to the site but not in it as it is anticipated they will use portable type sprinklers during the seedling establishment period during the first 2 years, there will not be potable water. Ms. King said they will never clear-cut on the property but would take portions in rows to leave enough trees for the tours and the screening effect, she said the project will always be aesthetically attractive. Testifying also for the applicant was Desmond Steele, Metro, Mail Stop ESC, 821 Second Avenue, Seattle, 98104 who addressed drainage in the area stating there is no access into either the P-1 Channel or Springbrook Creek from the area in question. He said it is a very depressed area but it is contained, and 8 ft. below the level of the roadway on the north side. He stated he feels the transportation of 30,000 cu. yds. of material with 6" of Groco would absorb a great deal more water than the area does now. Linda Osborn, Planner, 1414 Alaskan Way, Seattle 98101 is the Landscape Architect for the entire landscape master plan and construction documents as well as the silviculture to be done for the entire project. Ms. Osborn reviewed the landscape plan for the area of Monster Road and Grady Way and how it fits in with the landscaping either under construction or that which will be within the next couple of months. She presented Exhibit #6 with an explanation of the landscaping treatments at the Monster/Grady Way corridor. Jerri Jackson again spoke addressing the recommendations suggested by staff; the project's 1600 ft. distance from the heron rookery and noted again they are not near water lines, and the proposal will have no impact on this area. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:30 A.M. • Metrd • A-085-88, SP-085-88 ecember 5, 1988 Page 3 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, The Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (METRO), filed requests for approval of a site plan for a demonstration forestry project and a special permit to grade and fill portions of an 83.5 acre site at the Metro Renton Sewage Treatment Plant. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Determination was issued in this instance by Metro, as the lead agency. The checklist prepared for the proposal referenced the Environmental Impact Statement prepared for the treatment plant expansion prepared in 1981 which contained references to the use of composted sludge in landscaping efforts at the plant. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located near the junction of Monster Road S.W. and Oakesdale Avenue S.W., at the northwest corner of the Metro Renton Sewage Treatment Plant. 6. The subject site is zoned P-1 (Public/QuasiPublic) and is dedicated to the Metro Plant. 7. The applicant proposes developing a demonstration forestry or silviculture project on approximately 105,000 square feet, or approximately 2.41 acres out the 83 acres dominated by the plant. The project is intended to demonstrate the enhanced growth rate encouraged by the use of a composted mixture of sewage sludge and sawdust as a fertilizer or growing medium for two forest species, Douglas fir and hybrid poplars. The intent is to provide a convenient location where Metro can conduct tours to demonstrate the affects of using the sludge mixture. Currently similar tours are conducted at the University of Washington's Pack Forest which is a substantial distance from the Seattle Metropolitan area. 8. The applicant will set up a series of plots where the trees will be grown in a natural medium and in a medium enhanced with a commercial formulation of the sludge mixture called GROCO. The natural medium will be used as a control and is intended to demonstrate the contrast between enhanced growing medium and normal forestry medium. I 9. Tours will be conducted as part of the normal tours Metro provides to the treatment plant. There would also be separate tours to demonstrate the potential of the Groco mix. The applicant and staff predicted the traffic impact of such tours will be minimal. Currently approximately 2 to 10 such tours occur at the Pack Forest. While not stated, the convenience of this site could lead to additional tours. 10. Two areas located close to one another will be filled and graded to permit the planting of the demonstration projects. Douglas fir trees will be planted along the western edge of the area in a area approximately 30,000 square feet. The area will be broken up into three sections. The generally northernmost and southernmost sections of trees would be planted in the Groco enriched soils while a band through the middle of the Douglas fir area would be planted in soils intended to imitate native soils. The latter band would constitute a control to demonstrate normal conditions as opposed to the Groco enriched soils. 11. Similarly, a second area of approximately 75,000 square feet, generally north and northeast of the Douglas fir area, would be planted with hybrid poplars. This area would be a "biomass" demonstration area. The intent of the biomass area would be two-fold. It would be used to produce a quick growing tree species which could be harvested to provide wood fuel. And again, it would be used to demonstrate the enhanced growth properties of Groco. Again, two sections of this area would be supplemented by Groco mix and a center band would mimic native soils. In this biomass area trees would be cropped or coppiced in a fashion to permit root suckers to grow from cut tree trunks. 12. The area would also be landscaped apart from the demonstration forest tracts. A walking path would connect the two sites to each other and to the Metro plant. Benches and observation or viewing platforms would also be provided. / • Memo SA-085-88, SP-085-88 December 5, 1988 Page 4 13. The site would be irrigated, especially during the initial growing years, to assure the project succeeds. Irrigation water would be provided by treatment plant sources but would not originate from potable water lines connected into the City's drinking water lines. 14. The separation of water lines and some other precautions have been taken because the sludge component of the Groco can contain residual pathogens, bacterial agents capable of causing disease, and heavy metal constituents and other possible contaminants. The Groco mix is a mixture of recovered sludge and sawdust. The ratio is three parts of sawdust to one part of sludge. The mixture is than composted for one (1) year before use. This processing removes approximately ninety percent (90%) of all pathogens. 15. Metro also takes actions to reduce the amount of metals in the product, and food chain studies so far have found no significant affects on wildlife from living in or feeding upon the vegetation grown in media such as Groco or sludge. 16. The composting removes most of the odor and background odors already at the plant would probably mask any odors produced by the use of the Groco. 17. In order to accommodate the proposal and to approximate normal growing conditions, the applicant proposes importing fill materials and the Groco to the site. The maximum amount of imported materials would be approximately 30,000 cubic yards of materials which would require between 1,300 and 1,400 vehicle trips. The number of trips could vary depending upon the capacity of the trucks used. 18. The applicant intends to import and apply the Groco mix once. A six inch application over the enhanced forest area will be applied initially. This one time application is all that will be required. Analogizing to time release medicine the Groco will continue to supply nutrients over the life of the project. Reapplication is supposedly unnecessary, unlike lawn maintenance. 19. The project was relocated away from potable water lines at the Metro site in deference to staff and Health Department concerns regarding the constituents of Groco. At one time the applicant intended to use 100% sludge which had potential odor, runoff and other consequences which are not likely with Groco. 20. Two issues were raised regarding the site's proximity to the Heron rookery located approximately 1,500 feet from the site, generally northeast. One issue was the potential disruption of the rookery by noise associated with the proposal. The second issue was the potential for damage to the water quality of the forebay by heavy metal contamination, sediment runoff, or by the introduction of nutrients which might lead to algae blooms. 21. Staff recommended that the rookery be monitored especially during the critical mating and nesting periods to assure the Heron are not disturbed. 22. The applicant proposes a drainage plan which will collect runoff from the site if overflow should be a problem during heavystorms. The geologyof the site as well as the drainage plan g p a and the proposed fill materials are expected to prevent water from leaving the site and entering the stream systems near the site. The treatment plant is flood proofed to protect the treatment plant from anticipated storm and flood conditions. The silviculture site itself is depressed about 8 ft. below the level of the roadway on the north side. A series of swales and drainage ditches will direct runoff, if it occurs, to the treatment plant or a sump system where natural percolation will occur. 23. Staff has suggested that the hours of hauling be restricted to prevent interference with the peak hour traffic. Staffs suggestion that approximately 7 trips per day would occur would mean that it would take approximately 200 days to import materials. This does not coincide with the Metro Schedule to accomplish the fill and grade during March and April of 1989. CONCLUSIONS Site Approval 1. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. ' Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; • •Metro SA-085-88, SP-085-88 December 5, 1988 Page 5 d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 2. In addition, proposed site plans must not adversely affect area-wide property values, and must not cause neighborhood deterioration or blight. The proposal appears to successfully satisfy these criteria. 3. The Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code both provide for the development of public uses at this location. The plant and proposed forest project are compatible with both the plan and the zoning. At somewhat less than two and a half acres, the forest project will actually resemble additional landscaping at the 83 acre site. Paths, benches and overlooks will add to the landscaping aspect of the project. 4. The actual forest will not have any adverse impacts on adjacent property, and the applicant indicated that the residual sediments in the Groco compound have not been found to have any significant affects on wildlife, although studies were not presented supporting this position. This lack of authoritative information will require the imposition of conditions to assure that wildlife in and around the site, particularly the heron, are not adversely affected by a buildup of harmful materials. 5. The location of a heronry just northeast of the site is of concern to staff. The grade and fill operation is small and in and of itself should not appreciably affect the heron. But since the heronry is approximately 1,500 feet from the plant and project site, precautions should be taken to assure that the proposed operations will not affect the heron during critical nesting periods. Staff and the applicant should prepare a monitoring plan to assure that the heron are not affected by the project. 6. In addition, while the applicant indicated that there have been no significant affects along the food chain by the application of sludge which contains residual amounts of contaminants, it is quite possible the heron could feed on smaller species feeding in and near the forestry .project. Therefore, staff and the applicant will have to draft an agreement to monitor the rookery both as to disturbance and for possible contamination. 7. The applicant does not propose clear cutting or harvesting the entire acreage and maintains that the project will always be aesthetically attractive. Removal of trees will be selective to maintain both a buffer and a sufficient stand of trees to demonstrate the affects of Groco. 8. The composted material should have a minimal impact on the cumulative odors emanating from the plant. The material should not be more odiferous than other composted materials or soil amendments. Unfortunately, any odors would probably be masked by the background odors of the plant itself. 9. The applicant will have to reach an agreement with the Police and Public Works Departments over which haul routes to use for the importation of the soils and amendments. Both Monster Road and Oakesdale provide commuter routes, and hauling is not always compatible with commuter hours and routes. 10. The project should not have any adverse affects on public services, and the forest should not of adversely affect the passage of light and air, although the forest may well create additional shade. No adjacent use should be affected by the forest. Special Permit 11. It would appear that the issuance of a Special Permit to fill the site in conjunction with this demonstration project will not adversely affect the public use and interest. Again, the small scale of the area covered by the activity compared to the entire site will be minimal. - MetrO SA-085-88, SP-085-88 December 5, 1988 Page 6 12. The only potential problems are those generally discussed above - the hauling of materials and the potential for importing and possible impacts of sludge - releasing hazardous constituents found in the sludge or increasing the nutrient makeup of the waters in the forebay pond. It would appear that the design of the ditches, swales and sump should prevent migration of these materials off the site. The main source of concern would then be the introduction of these materials into the heron's food chain. This issue is also discussed above. 13. The fill is intended to prepare the site for the forestry project, and no additional development is intended for the site. The forest should blend with the overall landscaping near this corner of the plant and is part of the entire scope of work on the site. Enhancement along Oakesdale Avenue is part of the original expansion plans. DECISION The Special Permit to fill and grade the site and the Site Plan are approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will have to reach an agreement with the Police and Public Works Departments over which haul routes to use. 2. The applicant will have to draft an agreement to monitor the rookery both as to disturbance and to possible contamination. This agreement should be approved by a research biologist with expertise in heron and toxicology. 3. The applicant shall not permit any of the Groco or any material mixed with sludge, or undiluted sludge products to be located or placed over potable water supply lines or within 20 feet of such lines. ORDERED THIS 5th day of December, 1988. • FRED J. KA FMAN HEARING E AMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of December, 1988 to the parties of record: Jerri Jackson Metro - Mail Stop 66 821 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Roberta King Metro - Mail Stop 81 821 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Desmond Steele Metro - Mail Stop ESC 821 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Linda Osborn 1414 Alaskan Way Seattle, WA 98101 TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of December, 1988 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Don Monaghan, Acting Engineering Supervisor Members, Renton Planning Commission Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney John Adamson, Developmental Program Coordinator Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Valley Daily News • • ,Metro SA-085-88, SP-085-88 December 5, 1988 Page 7 Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. December 19. 1988. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • ■ E F O H ----- ------_-_- —..... \ PUGET SOUND v s� ii� \% • ,J, \ /i ce / \. 1 1 I \ o • 1 \ • y •�/� \p\ SUNSET SW RAND •\ 3 \ \ \o \\ L' . III r3 - ' G\•\\ \\ �` NION CITY LIMITS \� BR ERTON `/ \)-, © �. •\\ \\\ '/ //�C�`E�a. // BUEC/ N� ��\ � ! Nppe�`/ f��\�� \7J,RHRR J ,! i,;�: •�� - ��\\ — 10TONLIMIT /A� // `�� `�� `�I' , q a �` i‘ • _ __ ^_ II — if • • . \ - z , I \ /__.1 /. fI1 %� � �\ Ivo) � � _ � METRO PROPERTY LINESEA-TAG 4 ; INTERNATI• • .0 RENTON /// r,\ '\ // OAKESDALE RD.�` SW Pt STR<T VASHON`� AIRPORT ♦ LOCATION // oo /I ) _ F 4 I SLAN OF WORK ,\..` '(\ •n /,�-•` `, D ` \\ r EKING COUNTY p j O i I j KENT ` ,\�; Q O 11:1 CD 4 ..; _ © \ CITY OF TUKWILA O \A g ► J RENTON DEMONSTRATION \ y . , .AUBURN \. // (SOREST PROJECT E \cry 6_ m � \ RENTON SEWAGE [ git i - � .! ,� •\\ TREATMENT PLANT V.4 1 c S '/1 1 � _ '?� - .•=\ \ OOO Oi \\ GOY WAY 3 ! �� : �. % .y.� O00�pOO 11 SW I 1_ r_� 1 SCALE IN MILES I ��• t , \\\• \ Q 000 �� • �'Z d—D I • 1 4as ' VICINITY MAP '\ `\ /// \\1\�\\ o / C5 DRIVE I INLERSTATEHMY ► • >�iJy -/ yam— �' .\\ 1p71 (..---77:---SW 16TH ST IS 156RD STI 2 �. ll\ et 2 It' s\.\\I. ir .---- ' % , .i I • 66 s • ? : • RACE ,, / A I `A TRACK \ N ' r 2 r/ �I �• „ LOCATION MAP • 1 • • r - _ I \` ,SCALE I"a 400' . ` \ I AT FULL SIZE ~ lD% SUN IN ITTAL IF NOT ONE INCH SCALE ACCORDINGLY R • Irr � �xs FE +IECTScas RENTON DEMONSTRATION_ e * m TA® M� ....1YI•of Metropolitan See °'"s-r9-ea I Osborn fi Flay, • FOREST PROJECT P [ o N I • Planners, inc. • RENTON TREATMENT PLANT �'"'°'° LOCATION AND VICINITY MAP$ •.••.•.w[.V �'"°'A un S`° AS SHOWN •«•G 2 5 LLlcs"+Kyon 9Bg1 • .,.,..^ .... A • v ♦ C 0 E _ _ F 0 v H. � 9 � . C A A E F A 6 II (^\ _ ]0 _ _" _ _— - _ - INDEX TO SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS - .. RASE GRADING `� — _ ' PLAN � I mom I NUMBER �� ss - --- . 1 ' : IN I A TRATION �� 20 I NU I ce / 7 ) N cAREAzNI7 ,_ A 2t I NU I G9 ` EV'• CONT/COL AREA , I Il��i�`. �\ 28 • I G4 I G10 a MON6TKATIoN : I II \zs \ �" \ �_ 29 I GS I G71 • AREA WITM e-- 'k\ - _ _ _ .....cji • .1 \ Ij - 30 I G6 I G12 1 /\ir - // NU - NOT USED/ \ •, �, _ , • I i1 O /iii I t> // OZO , /% /� . // /// PEG PATH _ // 2 i/ // 2 // / �(/ j4 l I✓ A .--- — ,\\ • t ''-I 1j 90% SUBMITTAL LFFIDEFFE FFOPECTE ER.RAEFS RENTON DEMONSTRATION '''''F R.ss. _ J T IETR0 ^�IQI�uEy OF wE EIE� «L. y'B•/9.88 Osborn &Roy, FOREST PROJECT D.R.w W I . lowIr LE.E Planners, inc. << .e,, wa';e«,D,uo, o,aoe;o: RENTON TREATMENT PLANT • � � mnaeTw. . MASTER SITE PLAN AND INDEX �YIG3 VI .o. I DEMO. I . I DATE warm• W/M 20'8B 4¢T•o,! °`11 / - B - C - 0 - E F V G V X • I. A A e A c A . • O • .� 1 L A F A r. r L. - _ TG►�ING _ __ _ - , __ _ __ _ __ __ I _ ILall I I- MATLN - - - - ML. _ O ./!irAl _ / / / w.s ex. W. 5vme •5 • - /H��Ilr+•• ® I I I // IpD ./ (�,X 9FMLLON 6WALE ��--` I' �'� e:QlO • : • EF••� •_ • �[e_=�c.yi�� /• / I ' I / I • t �tx. v ez. \\ _�17z' 12D `11 ki I uwT • �� Ili_:�� / / -53, . ^ ;AXE \ of w,PLa / /a,�RisG. 6o RV T I / I q� +�t A6H - LANv4LJ�fPe AND j11) / /, �l IIl l / MCGT AND / + 1 + l A /� IRfZIbATION_gEL Z ® , 8ill / y/EXNITNb 6ER / 1� \•� (lip) t�,..„.... C.) 1 f)MAPLE ��r I IIfl oNAb, N7=► rtL VNOtN ON THIS►L1N 1, TyfiGAL ALON �J +I I I I f JCEY PLAN '� /�� No1�TN blx' r r 1 ---� 8, S I;4� I 1 6 ro sum./ / - 4 p15 / / . ---- �` O /• / /•' / %1 / + i Ill Q I �� A \ D2 • _ I I It APPROX. COUNgy,RY' Ii / -•---- I 1 ' LANOGdAPE AM,IKRWATION+ i ( _ //o ---' \`� I I /.1.. ...........(. 6E5 SPELIFICATION5, I AK MENT // F / �— -- —\1 'X. 5�APPLE�N�� LANVKAPINfo cCFiv I J � V�PD \ 111 �� A , 'I IRRIGATION / _ •F Air /p'7 �! _ ++.` // e 4 f14 i /• � _ ...\ 9•APPLe. - 7/020.) -1409 I k • , . / / (./te.) a� �Yi iFM O. dr. K LIMIT LINE / / • / T f / • II MEET AND .. � NPf25: �lrF� MATGH • ALL-MEWS 1.4SlCar. 7 = - .r-�.Ade.s :PIO .�]�'� £X16T IN(! 3 J' �� P6 LOF WORK LIMIT LINE 7 • AT FN[E W / Ili y !00 • TO es KE move v 'Eli ELEVATION 3 WORK LIMIT LINE f7L 525 6PE at PILI.TIONS. I RO P4 �•1" 2. 52E PATH NO 2/bIS ti • 1... r/ - t lF�3t P3 O4 PATHANTD ULANVINU PLAN 61I I / `F� I .,� ' G� • LOLATIONE, I I • I S7. 143.1422 1 ► '~' I [i G• 151.5 - I I PG=yo2 8286. I Ti i______••- / �p/ PT.300.E286 — rc3G0.2714 .. • I I' P _ ._..I 2 :.....k..N. • • III/ II - r (Ui) jf(ree) r.0 7 • _ I a ci- • �-_` �- _�_-..l D.0 - _ +/ Np) `.,' , - ;\�S;._1 -. .2507 -1Y- 74.8 - _ , _ PPT 37.20489 ‘..: .:. 4 \. I l� -_ -�_ 7. _ ._ . x q[sa Cs 1 \\:... G4 109.5 _ rpFNr -i '.Li 76.1138 I247� `�• APPH 0K.bOUNVA RY -� -lr_ • - � / 14G. i /1475 \',i PG•'124.7HD bB.4G3��► _ - 1ANIO5GAP5.AND y- -___.1. - - ` _ 1 � " i t. PT- Zoo.d28G\ - I_ _ '.r / T -S `tL�4.19b\e1•et I \--._— .\.,,.. '� IRKIbATION IO , / -1.- I r-: • ENLAKGEMe _¢APPROX. �g f__ /' (Ni), 1C-3 i \:. fSap, �r T�It c5 CONFIbl1KAT1O . 0---'-i— 4e: to . \�•`-�j/ /,' / L�NO5c9P'N/? . T / ZONE:3-027 '// ! I 1501 i K -ft GJ2 T.':1,. \ y,..y� NOTB. --�` t / IR IU'A ION / _ /�_ _�� - I • . EE SiNCET G4 FOR 4EfR0 CONTRALTOR TO VEICIFY EXkiTtNLE/ / /'y IIIIam _�- "s ,, % `I \ yI �� c,RADIN(7 LooRDINATES. C., / ^ }' -�.-1 f ��/ / -�� CH4) , / �./ I LOCATION of< LIMIA55T ANIN YTO LLF GEL14R6 • __-`� `^ • WORK LIMIT LINE / TO SE ReTAINEnf + / .ti l_� \ 152 .O 4 '" ,.,„„ ZItT AP APPROPRIATE NO/(7RO111p�-no ,( --� x (�4G) \ j �•^ E I T O p YI rn-t , • EE vIgTLRYIea y1 G7 '� / ` (/4e) fSe) r LINE \14..n\ \:•r:,:•�,G.O �� `. - . I PRIoft A �yyA{�L / NIT}41N THB ORIPLINE ) ) f54 J 1M.5 O Sf LON6TRUCTION�M..NAO �` _/ • / M . _ - A /• - r ® 146 �. 4 4 / MATLHLINO o. -- ER ROA, -\ • N /" , /r PIPE o �`�ATGHLIN 4. I • Ur M DSCFPEaaEC1SEAFTNEF6 • RENTON DEMONSTRATION F.R. m E T R 0 I.nlelpoLIt5 ofN.vopoLlten 54attL. w I`J-88 Mu Osborn &Roy, FOREST PROJECT D.R. I F:R. 1••20,_0. r a Planners, inc. MtuR•eED. 74,0 Yu•I•L,p.GRADING PLAN 2 G5 dea al< w u wDyslp. os v yoeol RENTON TREATMENT PLANT W/M20-ee saErG5 �,4 .crlslw I n I NM - EW• F 6i •r .._ T V - -v �1.. v- v A 0 C p • E • F G 11 • A 1_ ° A ° - ° 11111i E _ A F . C • M --a — / ii ///// 1 i • ( 1 . 1 I. /.. . 0 4 —1111.61.91:"2=1.- • , ..4" r . . ._Itsizilum.:..0.2m „ ir • . IMF / • • / . AREA SHOWN PLAN / . KEY PLAN / • NO SCALE / ' . • / • / - 1 -4- / . / . • • i / / �,_ FL:= iz.zAo T T // T" /2' T T _ li L_ rl ► J‘44 / I. 2 `� I 2 6•' HYnROSEEn NTH l�,2A55 4EEv I 4 • mix THc PEMONSTKATION f LANTINl:� • OP A9-E4 ,SERVICE ACLE6, KOAD . / AND ALL AREAS fl,�Jt'lrepe. • PUfTD A GON2TK ULTION RS ' e.r,ecIFI CATION. OLIT6IDE • //7" TOE GY FILL / 1?=43' ► ezloc T '' 7(41 I C�2:1 9LOI'E'-TYB-� Qo Ii • '? --IZp___ _I2o_— — \ gci vitce;ACCrs�-TVP. 1C'.4) PIPE -}7� �\ (4' C4)917 I ? '°T DEMON67 7tON AReA J/ J•"'{�I_ 7QQQ CO °C76��O �OO�O OO°OO13B \\1 • o - 0.1 A or-s, ._.) ,, . I . ,, ▪ MATCHuNE 7 t• - MATCHLINE. c / / SO% SUBMITTAL `I 1� PLAN 3v 1� y Ipry Effo.rcc>SEaFn+cRs RENTON DEMONSTRATION F R. �� ;171ETR0 IOnlelpalIty of INVwpoLIt 5wtt4 '�'8 19-aa Osborn &Roy, FOREST PROJECT O.R. I M.W. i••zo'-o• r i Planners. inc. �="EamaT�, LAYOUT, PLAN 6 ,,..1K�' w. I acnsla I m WE 1414 RbSMO•�u SeO1.I"O51"tori000, RENTON TREATMENT PLANT A'°i0"�• W/M20-68 G 12 f 244I. EKu, �In. MEET.o.12 15 •••t.. .u., , V ° V C 7 0 - E F V G .� M i . D - E l F A C. • .AIM• N . _� - / 1 I _ I q INC I /� • / / -/ v e • I to ; N tA7cMuIWE , . _ � _ / / /l\9°Ca�PIP=-^� // .4..00••• •O••:••••�• ••: O H4vRoeeED' MOTH ra - , 5 .. '�`+'_c�_�"' / / / IO / •�• O •• l /• ••�� • ••l^J Q�I ARe c3F4�6E•RV1GE66 S • 1i11E.�..,..1� ( r •� \J i / ,C �...,�....'-T . , ROAC AND ALL ARG,+Fo .. up :�' A ,GON6TKLJGTION PEAS. I.+I,.n :I'Q� teelomArINCe AREl� /'fr 00 •e •p, 1•�e e , Oe 1 �_ `-Ank7- ro'T IJ�1��ii-..s • gafte Q-II PENT pIGFAATION��AA17olal • _irl ' /: 11467411111MW 0 OUP Oge21.0 0 01411.1100(-110 04.0 i ,I . , I. . 1 ,i) y E 1� �' / /: •e •e • Q 1. A •I. � e lee to-A .... . •1.• • b ► • • • (. �� • O ` I I i I, • P'� ■HIE�'�IWt`• I .f• ��r ! .bP N0.4 / / •'e •ire. • •e •• „e w• \'ea'. II 1 I ' , w weicreo J; po , DOUN TRIG o•Fror ••�� •� C••�•�.►� 001 1 • i air ` -• , �! •�•®1 •� !•N5 S .. .^ti �Oe {•• ••/CIOMAS COMTKOL PLAN7M(9 ARGA O .• O � � • , i y .w/ . • ,DR NO.5 • 6000040 OO /% / I:% \ •N. -4' ' 4„rbAT6H AND 6LEND� /• / / O.. O II` O O O O O , , l•/""'s."- • -wy/� .�— -`\�_T MAX 1.0R EI•TSIRE'" �• RDLDNIAY NIo AGGE / / •' O O �. CY' _— �' v1 ' .,4,•, I - IWAT 1N_�` \,_ �_. N j ^ 6�/' / / a ;-y ( • �- E(r , w//,` ---�\ RHYtove•!/.r'•,ut.Ga1+rKT �. O 3 3 r •• e / •�"7 ' 2'IrATe V».LVE,'2• NZ. rIP6 _ . / Q CIOMAE+ED / • v ......;: ;ytv ='�✓ • •mei, TRI�f�1� IfttGpPTf.ZL6 `ANo QwcK-COUPLER 6Y6YEM PL NTI TRATiQN • I es'. , 1 -Ex,bT4F may ruC-OUT PLANTING AREA „ • F5.1 no1� � -IN&-'YYP/-�` -ON -4 G4 PrPe AT _N ZOOS N •4.. t41'111� ''''.1.I / \ =EIB79 3- ^ . r •• _ .GONTRAGTOK TO Vf_RIPY IN' EL. ! -.- '' - ri.e ' ' , AND NQRI30NTAL. ALI(FMENT y 4 .»tt_.... �• , .—'� oP•�XI�iTNi6+ 4'G4 PIPC.. /� ,,,♦fir _y' N 'eNO PATH NO.2-HATCH I I] J� ® e•• O /. ;"��+�� i r�� f1 D LOCATE b. =H: TO ERATH 6 ELEVATION TRAbN-REGEPTAGLESo O« ROADWAY ► ' O e / t_ ..1reg "' � �.' .tb DIRtGTED $•(•LONf7RYLTION It al • •�AleAsk- !_'i/. _•' .. ` VM. / • /�� Mle. Ciro. C-N 1970,S C Ib(a6] ( • ii _ r.� \ =, �./J3 §per. rieNCN ) - \�ee/eeei 1, r/ si nert!_ /' zi' �y `, : No.7• • � P I• - .•T, ei \/r_II y FfCAfaH RECEPTACLE _ • - � �- lei,lipew •S f100 �O• > .NG.l ��` �? to a►°_rig, -04 O•--o et Oam ' �'_;'`_ HYDRogEe v _7 RtEjev \ LAWN. MIX PEAL - I •e` \ - , 4PpGIF1GATlOI.1,=- - a� l� �eIto� 0��=fie J AN��OO��"NI_ ,,,`:.(`.�. \.. 401 • t - 'DOLJ(oLA6 FIAZ •\ / e� e��• �4 O O r OO�1,�' 00 � ; D •r�+y►, .`•y�.. _ __ t �,� DE'MON STRATIOAF TNTI NCO �/ O • •,` w /� PLANTINrT L v. . AREA i' I``�• r / �-%Wfiei• O O ''" �' ♦ �w = — \izir . �� .:„„rCu _ ,Z�mi/)��%fall/' .e S - �`�14 wI� � / •/, a"G4� . co . - `` - • oud. FIR CONTROL- PLA4TINC9 AI' • - _---�� _. ocrte/itj MITTAL: ; ' LAN 29\ , ' ( lH'Tf�CPPEgfrMEC15ERRJaERS RENTON DEMONSTRATION al„FyR• I i=METRO laIpaLlCu of IMtropot1tan Seattle D.R�I�-/9'e8 F. RFD. TILE w. - 1 1 Osborn &Roy, FOREST PROJECT D.R. F.R. (�`:` zo' o" r le....... Planners, inc. ..„„, LAYOUT AND IRRIGATION PLAN 5 14I4 woo U,wa.Seale os...+o.onO5C RENTON TREATMENT PLANT I G II M� I REVISION I Er I DOE WROYfD. 0"D II n 14 : _ V V EVo,• E..n. `R. .„........ .M A 7 g V C V D E F G M • • 11.7. • • % • / /MATGHLIN� — 1 � �- * •- `,!•a� y � • / i�wa� T //1 \ - _ _ 1 r ♦ 0 �1' 4 r 4 P.IPE� ! J N MATa1L+ - f • ��_` HYfl+ccct�a W A - �r i4a -fir � z, _, . =� ..17� \" / , .� bCGC MIX rHe.vem TION _ /'�� - �,.?,, i-__r f ` AWING" AREA, CONTROL -- _ - . lig _ ��' i �� AR`e"`o,'C'�` '� • NO ARe/•.b, ANC ALL rIW.^O!\D _ \ I. • ' + _ - `ARTS TUR6HC QURIN6 \• • " IL= •+^ —_� \ - . • ' G:bNte TQUCT R �J'PEatrif_ATI[ �. r.14 - '� 1" l • '1- • /� • -`` �_-` t `rfR RO.O • .. 1 •. ALVE,2• 011C-ArPE, ANG • 1` / I C • . ` QWGIF- - • (aTeM TO EXvj71N OW PIPE.. '-- L.I / C��T 1 - • /di• �}-e-- eor�T+ea to ,�ReA / ice, j —`_� E,•vo I I I _ �� -� tia I • —_ • I ■MICA/ w.icsfuN�nu • - • : _ . .] .I - PLAN 2 • 11 o NN • 4- . NS ao • �O - . . ......v),,..-<'''.---"-*-'--: . •2 P0� ? 4.9. 7Z ' Bs - • .Clio— _ - - . -- : — I:oe • • O G • I a u I n o sP0% •UsMITTAL • ® g g PLAN 6 1 • xau., �� iHh• • • F.R. ��M E T R Music[poll of n.vopoLIt l s.oesC. 8-19-88 — '+tSCFPE HRCtiiKT56RfrNE(6 RENTON DEMONSTRATION r - ;,��• Osborn E Ray, FOREST PROJECT D.R. M.W. 1 I 1 y I-.20'-0' 1 I Planners, inc. PEOw`°f°' �e.w, LAYOUT AND IRRIGATION PLAN 4 W.I.�G 10 -' --=s•o-L C,>_c•111e wosn•N or Ce' RENTON TREATMENT PLANT 88 "'ETr.o.Ip or Iq ,9• I otNISIo, I " nR W/M20.roMrEO. rem Ewa. !1•,V _ V B C 0 E F G 14 A A —6' bROLO ON 3e' INDIANOLA SOIL-TVP. "HALL ROA 2 . • • OP DOUC2 FIR DE4.10N6TRATION AREA , , - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ EXCEPT t'70L6. FIR C:ONTISOL •:4.I1t...V.,,,,,z.:::i.i=i - _ __ - - - AREA lam`—GI bROLO'ON 3(O� INDIANOLA $OIL-TVI? --�� ISOOP BIONIA56 17EMONSTRATION AKEA-ExamPT ea0MA46 CONTROL AREA. bRAC.� 1 s w (PINISH s—R2°INDIANOLA SOIL-TN'? ' 140 OP 610MA66 CONTROL AREA ' / 42° INDIANOLA SOIL-TYB OP /---- 1,01Jb- FIR CONTROL AREA - -- —_i�i �EXISTINCO CaRADc - - - 110 ' • SECTION A-A �jCALE: VERT: 1'=IDI-01I HOME.: 1'•20'-Oi - 0.00 1+00 - 4.00 3.00 4.00 Fi'•00 63.00 7•00 $.00 ma I ( 1 1'1 (�"j i f I - I i I 1 7 I _ 150 110. 145 �' �� 1 f + 1 { I j • 146 ` 30lF.lAx,-'T41`.' { 1 I , 1 CC O•q0 PATH a d 4,---Sy f I7 =C. 674] \y� r t I 1 I t I I lAO - 140 7 //J �I •g.9s C. MAw.-YVr - 3 L ANOINC&-YVPJ • 7 ' n ni I ' i - - .� IS6 - 13 ^i5 1 So • I 1 ISO • i. 1 j f j 1 1 In� E 1 �n :n �- , 1 , I 1 I I , I 1 1 , i PATH NO.2 PROFILE STA.0400 TO 5475 ENO PATH NO.2 AT APPROX. N 1770, C 1846 2 • SCALE= VE•RT: I°.(oe-O° - MEET ANC. MATCH TO HORI2: 1'•80L 0' APrROX. EL�AD AT S _ 4 0. 1 t. SO% SUBMITTAL 1 - — - =51 F. it�ETAO ttuelalpelut$of n.vapeu ten S.otm y,a.8-/J-80 - urourw�Rwrcctscarusls RENTON DEMONSTRATION .",�► n�b. ' Osborn Fr Roy, FOREST PROJECT D.R. F.R. AS SHOWN i Planners, inc. fa1ae01b. f SITE LAYOUT CROSS.SECTIONS ..... IG 13 lala Rosman Stolca:.Wostweo,oBgl '�•13°f 14 • b. 1 at•ISIM n urt �i' RENTON TREATMENTN 1°i40n°• W/M20-BB E.,... fKa. 4la. ...nwe 4...., A V B - C V D V E F V G V N i itr:y--) • • 1 •::::•:***:::]:::::.. f__... • t_...._ ._ _ - .. i '0. 4k / • e 6 • • • * • * 4' ...::,.- M:H:i:i::.•:::•::!•• !• _ 0 ''• 2 ,,, ------r -• •?.?0: I I.i /,',ggiL.' es' , •ogogogo, • • • • • • • .,• • •,„ •••::::, .:::::::::::::::•• . • • • • • • • Vk • • t '':•,,.. X**1 ...:.1. • • • .• • • • • • • • ... .... _ 1 14111 -77' 1:i*O,Immill. _ .Aggga; • • • • • • • • • • t • • • ••• , ::E: :::. • • • • • • • • • • . \• • • •• .0g0g0g0g0 •. ••••••••••••••••• •••• .•.e. , • .::g:: .• r .:9?g.g!imm1111111 •. . . . . •••• ,---,- 'r•stikSiiiiin 1611 C- tip% 1101111111-- , tvggggggggc,' ••• • ••••••••••• •••• ••••• ,.;•.. •,.. :i . :;g: .".:11,657.•: .;.........::,:::0:1,,:. .. Wi-1111111 -1 ifili, ,• .1.1-,,,,i,:,.... . „,:,,oggggog• w•)4,14/1•• • s • • • • • • • •• • , 1 * : 11111:::::: i;.4:"Vggc'ep °°° 4 0 0°0 a • • • • 4 • • • I , mum -•,,,- . vgggigg,g,,;(‘,.• •••••••••••••••• Vggg,°O°O,', 1 ••••••• • ID.• , • • • • • ..• .\ .....__ • • • • • ---. Ai ... ...,.._,,,,„oggggg,g0„. • • • • r il . .60 iLi • • • Iii • :,'.. •• • .7,0,:o: 1110 •;...ai 'pill ,.. •O'')`oll, 1LEI ,...2,...A 1`...'.ggggOg*ig.. 1•••••••1 : • ,..,•,,• ••••••4,•••••-:•!' . :0°0?• ./ 54-';liN4 ,;•;:,0g,goo• . - W',... .II."'' *.' 11.1km il:III ."''- 1. '''';1 :Milli ..'....7•:•:. 111/.11:1111 60;91-1:11•••••:::.:-n 14A14,k!IIII4/11. •,„, O. i •gogog%gggg...) • • • 10m.---Ii==g05111 • • '' - •.0.0.0 0 0 • '•„ a 1•6• 91 .--._ a7;: -'!OgggOgggggk.. •ti•O*O• illaniiii ill .i.' ?1 i,by r , s km : a a , . . ..00°.• • ' 4 ,ogogogacgogo° •t .00.0• •.-------4 :--1' . ooa000° " •' 0 °0' ,,•••s. t ...A. , --1 z•.:,.:x :::. :1*,:igialg• .1..1g 7;doi 1 ii 1 riaLl• ii, Am.. , i 0, .i at.- ., • otr.:44:0::; ,.... ____ I .1 li U0Digggii0AiAlli i •I' 4/.61/ •r ... I 'sr _L._ ..(3°O°;\ .'141161.: .. . ,°Cigggggo 000%000 oo,000.000 4,°0' 1 o.o JI:, 11 0 11013" .444. 44 6 1"40 kr! ill111•11.'i.t fi A/.•• . a -‘11WAT.I. IIIIINIL 116likoz: . Air INI -1 •'. •-•-=---•••• i ,==i . : . 16 • (44 ,, 1111 , .3<!re..57.•:.:e...,, .!.'.1Itt • ..:..71:1r:f•-,A. . .•.• 0';044'; If 111111k'41tAi•irci•••) /•°' 1 ::. .0g0g0g0gOgq, Pdlihiliiiiw' ••••tlf c.: ' .....:(:c..c. • '',., I ( '41)1.1':'.ki',44 • '''.(.1111 ??gOggOggq illilli lillib'j'C''014 . • • '1.(17•' ff... '.:111141442m . h•I IIIINII:rF ILC's 4/....a.c.illio.) (24\1:: 't'...c:::1( •••, .-).' ..,:i,]Mii::i:i::.:.....', '3' ,. ,.,,t., 7 Iiii irtip )ii: ',\s' .. , mortiric'''',11111. ' ••.,.• .."6.07; _' _AK .,ilk 4-„. : 't _ •,. r ;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::...... • • ,',t••r',',•?c!;%,.-•„ ,...mormak .-', Igo sem 4 v.0 , .....L. • ,.. . v... .::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::*::::......1.0,.1:„,t.,,...,:,•rc,:;.:,..„ 4 .,,. .161:slim 14111 • 111° .• ' . 1 Alkliklin-!.ye -Tr"-•-• -.MOIL•;,a...4. • 4.' .4:'::Iniii!iNii:M::::M.:":t.;,.'•A°.1..1.0\":": i'iRlq.4;1•Li\IN ,dr"-- ill:0=07 Iiiiimilermir- 7.1,„I. ' • :::::•:0::K:K:i*:::. Y'r.V.V',,,,:•V;•ijril.. . ' ,C..I",;:.•• y,\ z:..?,,c;4 4 . . . :'••,:•...1- •:•:•:••• '4",?,r, . • 1 11 iiirg:•--4519.11!:0111;141P • 0.i-0 P.: 114: . Iiiiiiii•Iiiiiiiiig.. ii^7.11";.'''__--:--_-_1±::::=1.-±-±1====:-_-_. •'".;:.*::•••:::-.4!'t'''6".!'• 4 - . . g•go.,„...-.7 iiiiil . •., ,..‹...i• .. . , ,, .,..15.t,•t•. ...... ........ .. . • • ..•.•••.•...•...•..............................•... •- ..? "*:2 ''..P.. .7:7:i:::±E -;- 1--7- 7:H= 2-:: ''. .::: zi:-20,77.,,,* ---1.1 1 ' ii'r.g't411 1111m: ; r •,,:. !,..,,,,.. v e:.,L's•?,, -____ ..•,•:',,,,, / o'..,)6::-.--._ .1:::::....:-•,..: _-_-_7_-_-_-_"'" .' .":*::i:Mis ii:U.: :-al • is 4000014 IN /"" .-.;11;,„:s,..,..„:, ..,),-,..,,i .: -----,---..,, v , MP/MO - ''''''':•::::::::i:iri: - •.A'..',,..::,‘,.,',i:•;';.',•.: 1 AIN ilfitiP.F . ipx:s ,.0,...::::•••••1.::::;•.:40:1 ( AM. A ,•, :_2______... _ __.. .. .... . 1 ,g hz,.„0::4::::...(,..:,,,.......50.41 • iii, '''',:''.;11,',A',"?;): . .. ..r. . ,,z•m':•i..-":•'..d..-AzI - ,/.;.5.4.i....„,N.,-.:-_111-p-_/-_m.----01. • ..-..--(7:46 ::,. ._-_.= ---- - - --I .- -------- --• -. le og,-)iills•11! n; Ii ( I :. Ell) '4''.0:1.11V•;% • UOL.0 0 0 0 , L 0000 - oono 5 s 647.•-• 6: ------- '00, 0 - .0"... --t•n•,- --. MP/MO 7 .,gc,e4.;:e,:€ --=-:=-2-7 '.f 1 V093%941 Po°0T 1 1 1'::"•lb %I iv " -.J :.: . ( ••••re%iP•rci• ,,W09M0°09=0*.•'•-• :•-• :-:--• ••: •••:•-•L-:-- ** . -.--I-. I 0 0 II 0°0 000 pi 1 - Ililliiii11111 • • s 1 ,L.,.,.,.. 111 ;11 ,...,, '•.•r.•,..-5.. ..-:01- .. /..:*1:i::::.:..! .i.z?;,.0.v.,_,..,..:,„.,;,,,,:..,•;.:X.:::: tl',::):•,'" e:.!;:u Ci. 'f 'IC-2e OVono°o°0°093°OrtiocOO.;•'.:: ------:..----T-7.-:- .--- - '_:-7--- - . i.i y 11 g ...Lill ..::giEgi:::•.. *. cc..,‘;•,`,':..,17:•?,',...,i,:''',,i'.'.Av- 5,, ..1, ,•••• .,,,, ............,... ,,. :-:---. • .. - -di Iv .1 I EMU ... •0.00000.930.9=00.0.0.... ...am...il b . _ ._.,_ Irt __- ,116._ . I LI ilemeno. A......................... •r.t•-: . ........ .\‘ •,*11,,. .0.0.0.0.0.0.000 0 0 o 02)]. -2-:---.--iu •-__ .EI a!II: _'_.'- : lg qr • %, ,c,o t-,a oid-.9-:•Poi••• --.. - 'ffieg' _-._- '77' _ _ Aida' ...1.1 ;:--1 eg••••••••••••••••• •:1,.,,.., . ... !/;4" .../..______ \•••• 'Po."0°.... •••••••• ..e ..L2L--2___L_-_-_ -.- ----WNW . - .144 ..' t::::1 ' " ,0 • '° • • • - . - . •..:.:.:.•.:•:::::::::::::::::::';';'.%:':':':':':': ''' :i-:,,•, °°°• 1 ffis • l':: 4.. .9 '...."'".".11•111 N --,--,.7.--.1vip ern hiii,. .,.... -.::::::::.::::::•:•:•:.....:•:•:. . •.. .. P .., eZ ......:::::::1::...::::::::::::::.1 .,.,..0,I.;ti,...4,I:Al•tl),'•',,‘•::r /Amillifigiiiits.:,. ,-.00itirl.11011111j2k4 --....„ . i . ,.._%:•:::•::::::::::X::::::' :. ''. ' ' ' # • i$1P'\.'..... •.4 : r l• %i : .--7-7-_____„‘;:;.- --:-_---_-:_:-_,---_-_-:-.-.:--_-7-. _-_-:__:::_-_-_±.:.--_:_-: ;g.,: _4411 •,...•. i _ 1 :-.--------:0E ------M.P7M0- :.---:-ff::-• -:•::: • ,--• , . •:i:iii::.. v, :-.-:,:: c'o° M::•. •b,;.'•:: VI 6 1.- ...:-). oc, ........... e.-ri • ••• 1 • #‘ IAA ...... . I _ Ill i - " .,,V, --7:-...-Trfl&ti .000 _-_-_-. .:, .ti .0. 4ii::::::::•::::::.....1• bi.... - • . ism • • • i _ •.. 000 ••::i*:i:i::::::i;i:::::,,p,R.. 1 Envoi ‘ ----'„ __ _-1-_____0000 ___ .2::.•:-, 11118 _1 ,. _ 1 •-;., r 1 - - •- -- ^, "Ai!: 11- -'.1.,.1 11 I 1 i___ kl, --. _= =_ 1: ;f:i.f. i!: • . t 'i:; : •.••:•:_i:::::::•• • .„ I 7 ,. - - --- -- r :-.!%•-•.,,-, • ' ' 1 ::.--,.0:`,--7,-: '- . - -.• - • . - - _. "i ',''' • e---' 11 - - .!2'' •t:7,7 _ :.- __.‘•,?;.'-:.-".`1'. :-_:-__ __ .."_.:..__. _ ',1./...': 093°.°0°0 -4. ,kirc_7 _. . ,..._ .0000• r.rf '.5 00000 en:: • ;:, •:::::i:i o o o 0 0 0 0 - ..'•.?. I ...... 000000 1 • -',... 000000 . 1.,-,.. • •000000• . • 0000000 I '" --i.). -wwe.- 7---=-:- 7-•1:--:---:•--: ..--. -::, ......•- I 7:::.l':! -7M 0- : -.7:-:-._2-7.-11 OP 4 M°__-_- _-.--. 1 l',. . .••/.? 1 IF. :________ ______. ___ _ ,.,.,,,, .. c,........0.0 ...• _ 1.k ,....,•:-: ;;•;:,, , ill -N.- •'......;t:t- • .•-_--_-_ -:..---17.--_-•=-Et •-_---.:- .:..::. ii• 1 •' ..7).:i':":.:'.'7.".-....z;:,•'" :------ --------------S ---- `01.• - 11(0,,, a i ••• •', .1 1 il• .',;,..5....z:i.3._•.-,r, : --- -.---- -- • ', ! .-4?),,,,, • . ••'''' • •• . ,....!...‘i• '.:',V.. .....e:),,:. : ---- ' -- ---T --- `5...; E, ..I••'!••'•-,• ••,'-'.':"•'••••, 9.-:•,,::: :. •------ '---------_-_- :---_z .,..,. r.% A/ • 'L.,:.• ....:!.I e,_._..:0•_es(...q".1•;i1z:.•-,ir:,:•;,:a• ,....:•_:-,,• .• •_-_-_- -_-_-_-_-_-_:- 7'_-_- ';.,' , , • 'i.:,,,'.7._=- .....:-_7._-_-_-_-_-,1.:1,..n.f?.: , :: -___-: -_-_-_-_-_-_- :-_-_-- ...r.-,.• 1 j'..i,. . -• • ::-.:-.' =-------1----------1. ...•-3".. .,;?•,- - ---- --------- - ---- :,:: i .-. se • • • '!: --_7_7-_-_-___-_-_-_-_:_ir:_________: ________:._________-11 ,.._-____ •,...., • • ( __ _ _ ____,.______ ___ ,, ::':1 1 •• 1.....1." • • ,.., 57, ..:.:....,x::::::::W..WEIse LAND USE ELEMENT 1!..,.•; •::::::*.i::.i:.:.i::.iiil.i:.:•ii•Iiiin ail :: :.::.i?,..:::::::::::.:::;via.r.lik :::::::.?;:iimiiiii*:..,61 at iihk ik .„..-...:.. 1 ... :.::::::. ::i::::::iiiiiiii: •••61„.is ,f 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 r,r-•.r t,. . 1111 I I Single Family 1111111 Commercial • ••I . .0......., •• ,,,,:ri..s..v..7.1.. ,...0.00.• .... ,., .....0.0 ,0000000:,‘. n000000•• 00o000000000•. •;.; . •,,:'- Ao.o.0.000.• ..0:::', .•. ;,,, T .000000.0... .•• . '..:;:t 1._11k. _ ...i.,•.,..2 i el Low Density :::::::::•:::::•:.:. .................... Multi-Family Office / Office Park ...... ,..... :•:•:•:..:•:•:• ,.., •.• .:•:••• „roillo.,00.0.0....... •iiiiii:i:, „.y„.:43,..!, _, ....00. •:•:•:.•:•:•:•. „.....1„.„•:. . o.n.o.... ,..... ,.;...4.._... 3000•00000' ••:: ::::: :•• 1',;'•',A• %,--- r 0000%AM° .1"' ' ''' • '"•:.•,..',..•.--.- ...°°°O) 0°.°• ?,-.1..'•-!-:•ip.'Pi.c,.•:•?.',6;'..',12.-' ... ..... ,0000 000 / .j71,;. ''''•'1.?.. . ‘5; :MUM Medium Density ....0.0, .,00.0.0.00.0.00, Public/Quasi-Public ••:.*::-. '.:,-..:, - -- -.• ............................ Multi-Family ,....... :•:.:.::.... J.• ll, .............. .0000000C ..:‘" I . 1 1-- ' )• NORM High Density .::.: r, .00 ...,.....,:„..:.:.:.,:::......., Light Industrial -,•:. 00., ..c.,:z.....,..,0:.:N:•:, .f..,,. 0.:::::::::,.i,on.: • ,,,,...3, • ,.:•• ,." .LkRecreation •g • ' ? • •••• • • • • • Heavy Industrial •. • 11 ..,. ,. , , 1 1 I. •.-,v..,,f,k . •1 • 1 ,.", .a.k.;-e'••`'•' b Greenelt - Manufacturing Park _o...-..f y e.-.• • / Multiple Option ' ''" ,,,,;?,,•,„„ 1 ____ .:N._ / , AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING • On the (( -- \ day of 1sckI€r cLr , 1988 , I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing .E. documents. This information was sent to: NAME: REPRESENTING: • (;eme- jckszy, r • • • SIGNED BY: t, SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this \ (r) day of 00 0 , 1988 . e__ Notary Public in and fo the State of Washington, residing at ��,10- DN , therein. Project Name and Number: SA - 085 -8o, sP-o65-66 I i� h 11� II h i k f CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9: 00 AM, NOVEMBER 22, 1988 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed below are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL ECF;SA-064-88 Application for site plan approval for a new Honda automobile dealership with construction of a two story building of steel and glass, approximately 34,500 sq. ft. in size, which will house offices, showroom,. and service bays. The property is located at the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. METRO -SILVICULTURE ECF;SA;SP-085-88A Development of a silviculture demonstration to illustrate the effects of sludge fertilizer on tree growth through the planting of Douglas fir (30, 000 sq. ft. ) and hybrid poplars (75, 000 sq. ft. ) to show the differences in growth rates between trees fertilized with sludge and those grown without sludge. The property is located at the Renton Sewage Treatment Plant at Oakesdale Avenue and SW 7th Street. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: METRO FILE NUMBER: SA, SP 085-88 LOCATION: Renton Sewage Treatment Plant at Oakesdale Avenue and SW 7th Street. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval of a site plan review application to allow the development of a silviculture demonstration project at the Metro Treatment Plant to illustrate the effects of sludge fertilizer on tree growth through the planting of Douglas Fir (30,000 square feet) and hybrid poplars (75, 000 square feet) to show the differences in the growth rates between trees fertilized with sludge and those grown without sludge. The sludge medium is GROCO consisting of three parts sawdust and one part sludge. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle 2 . Applicant: Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle 3 . Existing Zoning: P-1, Public Use 4 . Existing Zoning in the Area: 0-P, Office Park; L-1, Light Industrial 5.. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Public/Quasi-Public 6. Size of Property: 83 . 5 Acres 7 . Access: Monster Road SW 8 . Land Use: Metro Sewage Treatment Plant 9 . Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Undeveloped East: Undeveloped & Office Park South: Industrial West: Industrial C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation 1745 4-14-59 Amend. . Ordinance 1764 5-27-59 Amend. Ordinance 1928 12-22-61 Special Permit SP-0.65-81 Special Permit SP-006-83 Conditional Use CU-007-83 Substantial Shoreline SM-107-83 Variance V-045-84 Conditional Use CU-087-84 • PRELIMINARY REPORT TO 3 HEARING EXAMINER METRO Silviculture PUBLIC HEARING November 16, 1988 Page .2 Variance V-088-84 Substantial Shoreline SM-118-84 Rezone R-046-85 3961 12-13-86 Shoreline Exemption SME-003-85 Site Plan Approval SA-061-87 Special Permit SP-062-87 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: A number of private 12-inch water lines serve the site. See attached map of water lines. b. Sewer: A 12-inch sewer line serves the site. See attached map. c. Storm Water Drainage: Surface water runoff will be minimal because the subject area will allow maximum infiltration of rainfall. In the northwestern portion of the site, rainfall that does not seep into the soil would discharge to Springbrook Creek and the P-1 channel to the east via natural drainageways. In the future, plant expansion area excess runoff would enter the treatment plant stormwater system. 2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit: NA 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: b. Middle Schools: NA c. High Schools: NA 5. Recreation: NA E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-710, Public Zone (P-1) F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Valley Planning Area, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986, Pages 31-49 . 2 . Policies Element, . VIII. Utilities Goal, D. Sanitary Sewers Objective, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986, pages 22-23 . 3 . Policies Element, III. Urban design Goal, C. Landscape Objective, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986, Pages 10-11. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 'PRELIMINARY REPORT TO Ti HEARING EXAMINER METRO Silviculture PUBLIC HEARING November 16, 1988 Page 3 1. The applicant, the Municipality of Seattle, seeks approval of a site plan review application to allow the development of a silviculture demonstration project at the Metro Treatment Plant to illustrate the effects of sludge fertilizer on tree growth through the planting of Douglas Fir (30, 000 square feet) and hybrid poplars (75, 000 square feet) to show the differences in the growth rates between trees fertilized with sludge and those grown without sludge. The sludge medium is GROCO consisting of three parts sawdust and one part sludge. The applicant has also applied for a special fill and grade permit to allow the importation of 15,900 cubic yards of fill materials, approximately 12, 000 cubic yards of Indianola type sand and 1,500 cubic yards of GROCO mix. Rather than the use of sludge, the applicant proposes to spread a six application of GROCO mix (approximately 800 cubic yards/acre) to supply an equivalent amount of nitrogen (equivalent to applying 40 tons of solids per acre) to meet the long-term need of the vegetation. 2. The environmental review of the project was done by METRO as the Lead Agency. The environmental decision was completed in January 12, 1987. This was updated on August 22, 1988. The checklist prepared for the project (dated December 1986) noted that an EIS had been prepared in 1981 on the Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins (EPA) . That EIS made reference to the fact that composted METRO sludge would used for landscaping the Renton Treatment Plant. SITE PLAN APPROVAL 3 . The applicant has applied for site plan approval for the project which is required by the P-1, zoning on the property. The Zoning Code under Section 4-738 (D, 1) lists ten criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Plan Approval application. These include the following: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject site as Public/Quasi-Public. ,The project does not exactly comply with the Comprehensive Plan in that the project is not a facility or structure providing additional public services. Staff have determined that the project, however, is related to the activity of the treatment plant and therefore complies with the Comprehensive Plan. b. . Conformance with existing land use regulations; The subject property is zoned P-1, Public Use. This zoning requires site plan review for public projects and the applicant has complied with this requirement. The project meets appropriate setbacks required under the P-1 zone of thirty (30) feet from Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and twenty-five (25) feet from Monster Road. The remainder setbacks are ten (10) feet for the rear yards and five (5) feet for the side yards. The project also meets the special setback requirement for yards abutting public streets of twenty (20) feet. c. Mitigation of impact to surrounding properties and uses; The proposed project is subject proposal will have minimal impacts on adjacent properties due to the nature of the project, a nursery. In addition, the project is to be located within a depression which will further • PRELIMINARY REPORT TO E HEARING EXAMINER METRO Silviculture PUBLIC HEARING November 16, 1988 Page 4 reduce the visibility of the project from adjacent properties. Previous site plans approved for the site have shown landscaping areas in this corner of the METRO property. The City's landscape planner has noted that there is some landscaping on the corner of the property adjacent to the roadways but needs to be supplemented. The applicant should work with the City's landscape planner on enhancing these landscaped areas along the north and west property lines in order to provide a permanent landscaping buffer along S.W. Monster Road and Oakesdale Avenue. d Mitigation of the impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; This criterion essentially applies to buildings and structures. The project with respect to this criterion will be located in a depressed area which will be landscaped. The project is expected to result in minimal impacts to the site with respect to erosion and will not result in any undue cutting. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The project is not expected to adversely impact surrounding property values. This is a landscaping project that should not detract from the surrounding properties. The project as modified will not result in any excessive odors nor any threats to health. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The project as designed will not result in any major vehicle/pedestrian conflicts. The applicant has attempted to keep the pedestrian either separated or running parallel to one another with few points of crossing. The roadways are on-site circulation roads for maintenance of the site so traffic on the roadway is expected to be minimal. g. Provision of adequate light and air; Not Applicable. h. Mitigation of noise, odors, and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The project will result in some increase in the noise level during the construction phase but is will not increase the noise levels to any degree requiring mitigation. Once construction has occurred there will be some minimal increase in the noise in the area as maintenance personnel check the site and individuals visit the site. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Water and sewer services are available to the site together with all other types of services. j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The project is part of the Metro Treatment Plant. The project together with the additional landscaping to be PRELIMINARY REPORT TO E HEARING EXAMINER METRO Silviculture PUBLIC HEARING November 16, 1988 Page 5 required along the right of way areas should help prevent the deterioration and blight of the area. FILL AND GRADE 4. The applicant has applied for a fill and grade permit to allow the placement of fill on the site together with some grading of the site. Section 4-2303 (2) B of the Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance, lists a set of criteria established to determine whether or not the proposed activity will result in any adverse impacts on the surrounding area. These criteria are as follows: a. Size and Location of the Activity: The project site is a portion of the overall METRO Treatment site. Approximately 30, 000 square feet will be used for the Douglas-fir demonstration area and 75, 000 square feet would be used for the hybrid poplar demonstration area. The applicant is proposing to import approximately 57,300 cubic yards of material consisting of the following: 15,900 cubic yards of fill materials, 12, 000 cubic yards of Indianola type sand and 1,500 cubic yards of Groco mix. b. Traffic Volume and Patterns: The applicant has not indicated the traffic volume or the haul routes for vehicles bringing the materials to the site. In of truck volume, if the applicant used vehicles with the capacity for 14 - cubic yards of material, the result would be 4,093 one way trips to the site or 8, 186 tips overall. The applicant must work with the City's Public Works and Police Departments on the appropriate haul. The applicant may be able to make 7 round trips per day depending upon the source of the material. c. Screening, Landscaping, Fencing and Setbacks: Special screening or fencing will not be required for this project. Nor will there be any requirements for special setbacks or landscaping due to the nature of the project. d. Unsightliness, Noise and Dirt: The applicant, in the contract documents submitted for the project has specific language addressing the need to ensure that the site and adjacent roadways are kept clean. In terms of keeping streets clean, the contractor for the project is expected to cover loads, wash truck tires or use other reasonable methods. With respect to noise, the applicant will require the contractor as stated in the contract document, conduct noisy operations between the hours of 7: 00 a.m. and 7 p.m. The site appears to be approximately 1500 feet from the heron rookery located to the northeast on the far island in the P- 1 Channel Forebay. Based upon the testimony provided by various experts, the distance may be enough so as not to disturb the activity of the birds particularly during the mating and nesting • PRELIMINARY REPORT TO E HEARING EXAMINER METRO Silviculture PUBLIC HEARING November 16, 1988 Page 6 season. The rookery is monitored and if the City determines that the applicant's activity is negatively affecting the rookery, then steps will need to be taken to curtail the disturbing activity. The applicant should work with the City on a plan of action to address the issue before it arises. e. Surface Drainage: Surface drainage will be controlled via drainage ditches provided as par of the erosion control measures. The site is relatively flat and any storm drainage which might occur will be diverted to the treatment plant headworks or a sump where it will be allowed to percolate. f. Length of the Application of the Existing Operation has to Comply with Non-Safety Provision of this Ordinance: Not Applicable. g. Use 'of the Site: The site is a portion of the Renton Treatment Plant which shall be used for a Forest Demonstration Project. 5. Various City departments and divisions have reviewed and commented on the project. These are attached for review to this report. The comments from the Utility Engineer are important. These comments reference a letter from - DSHS which suggests mitigation conditions. A condition to keep the project site away from water lines is applied to this project. The condition regarding the setback from the pipeline does not appear to be appropriate since the applicant has modified the project and will not be using the sludge but rather Groco mix. 6. The above analysis of the project as mitigated will not be detrimental to the surrounding area and therefore should be approved. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above analysis, it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner approve the applications for Metro's Forest Demonstration Project, file SA,SP-085-88 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant work with the City's landscape planner on a landscaping plan to supplement the landscaping areas along the adjacent roadways near the north and west property lines. 2 . That the applicant work with the City's Public works Department and Police Department on the appropriate haul routes for vehicles importing materials to the site. 3 . That the applicant and the City work out a strategy plan to address any potential adverse impacts which may result to the heron rookery during the construction phase of the project. This particularly for the critical mating and nesting period of the herons. This plan shall be prepared prior to the issuance of a building permit and shall be incorporated into construction documents. • • ' PRELIMINARY REPORT TO , 2 HEARING EXAMINER METRO Silviculture PUBLIC HEARING November 16, 1988 Page 7 4. That the applicant not locate the demonstration area directly over any water supply lines. • r f ,/ %/ ��\\ SI/NS�et SW f �� /j RENTON CITY LIMITS \ \, \ \ / /�IAC�VERB \ (/ \\ euR�4NCrNNo i _ l? RN <0moo/ `ARR IOTONIIMIi p. � - ____ METRO PROPERLY LINE •\ OAKESDALE RD, / ) ) SW 71i STRUT \�\ �KTNG COUNTY A I z ., ---�- s TY OF TUKWILA �\ 000 °� ' 0 0 . / / RENTON D N)N \EMONSTRAT 2�, '^ \ .OREST PROJECT V RENTON SEWAGE \\ /./ TREATMENT PLANT �, _ • ,( ( VI g' 3 \ 1‘ . ___T_Io!ow\t\\ , \ 03O°O O°° 1 11 swGlk" AV �\,� Q oo°°o it • �• � \N\ e\1 1 N. / % % ` .\ 0 I %�ONpCES DRIVE INTERSTATE MY�5 F\ _ \.� \\ I \ SW 16TH ST IS 153RD SD 1111/!!P> : s ' g 1\1 i-<( I = sI \\ z .I LONGACRES % fita RACE m I'• TRACK `///1 . • \ g .1 -1--- N \\• %/ . r. jr, I 1 o • ` .i LOCATION A \.. _ of m I • • METRO — SILVICULTURE ECF-085-88 , SA-085-88 , SP-085-88 APPLICANT METRO TOTAL AREA 83 5 ACREST(BUT ONLY 5 ACRES AFFECTED) PRINCIPAL ACCESS OAKESDALE AVENUE AND SW 7th STREET . EXISTING ZONING P-1 • EXISTING USE SEWER TREATMENT PLANT PROPOSED USE FOREST DEMONSTRATION AREA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMENTS PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE RENTON SFWAr-F TREATMENT PLANT' AT . OAKESDALE AVENUE AND SW 7th STREET �r 9 W o 1_.- I r! - •- • T A • C ® e :y: ✓ �` 4 • • o • • • e I l 11 • • s • • s • s ;f Ip° ° • 1 i D • • • • • ,• • • '' ` [ r 1 1 :go:IL-- -!I` r°%;*' • • • • e • • • I• . • • r• ...'.. '^ 1 °o°o°o° • •••-••'• • • • • •' • ` • • _ i o'o' °°°°°°p°[ •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ,(,!' e'• L-I•o0o°i •oo°°o°°o°o° • • • • • • • • • • • • • >r• ` m ,o°p°•I-rea _ .'b°o°o°o°o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • q, `$1 ■ii , r °1•1 ' O°o°o°o°o • • •• •• • •• • • • • • • • �i•■. o000o Aj •I : 1 ��-Fi� ' o 0 0 o y•ii L i•• •••••••••••••••'•••'% o.:... ..i. bbbbb' iliffaati,-.41 ■■► ° hobo MINN r�°°b°°$°°° • . . . . . . . •°• 'Ito ''.:(.y� it I !! . •>. rrOo°o°o$o°' • ••••••• ••• • • • ••• �▪[;. pO F ,°• all '.1,• . `o°o°o 0°0 . • • • •I • • • • • •boo°• 4 ' • 0 0°0� •°000°°0p' • • • - •a 'I • • • 4 • ••:•• •°•O' r •°O°O°•°O°OO f) o°o°o°o0. -T1-7 >—---- • • • • • l: i • 1 � bbb8b ;:.:..., % �' a li b bbbbb • • ..::<; °, o 0 0 0 0 � � .',oI --. - o°°°°°s°°°°o�'aooaoo: ;!; I,•�r• a,iil ♦I _gew - _ Igo? -- .I' -- '°o°o°o°o°o°o •pogoA r -• ••• ' f; -s — ,Opbp°pbpbpb0 °Opb III , ' ., `f l • w i .,-H , ( --1 ,. - ,000000°0°0000. .00• I i F%oy: a.,,. N 1 Q ti —.1 f c°io0000o :A ° �� H siZt. Weil bpbQb°b°b°°°b°bp: rel:e4 00000.0o0 bilL8 4 -.-.- .:A. 4111 ktki i'lltilliiiiir Al•i'''''.7'3'..;.. .29 ill1111111V ,1' 11 r ,00.0,.,, ,,r.r.. ,„ .,, 0 0 0 0I• pal.• fl, c, 11 I„rr';'.•.',l - i7alinV4� ;' I• O°O°O°O° ills, " •�••t•C: •:l^C,L _- fit 000 O, :4_,..Q, • tl,, ,S4:. n � 1' 'CV,'..• • t'C'• r;, r. I hp°Opo+►o a iIF.Ii�i�� t.:(// •*• `C � �ji 000• `' r fr,,, ri, fir .... ) ;' _�� ■ ■ � ■■=G �1: � _ • -. n.. % � i Y r ■ 1 4i1 `�1 1t� • (4 ! t, 1• t' 1• d 4 � ' ri •:::::::*:::::::::::::::*::-. •.•[•.•,'< '•�1 'err o. •1. ` � t}C?t;o � .j.:%��t: •v: :F�'t'.:f•� •� r'Ui Eo .� ,('i•o ... • i ■■ °°•�:{lid=i �■ r+:■■I� ,.r.•.�. j.nr, s ,,,. --____ • �``ta+. !! ■ NM °, - �js- '^9•`.:, - -re ° bra: .l. Ilse __ _ •':mod --� : ■ ■■■I�° �r '' � •f�ll• , '[.. c;,o,., ',£ 0. t 1: :: � c` q J } s1 ■ [ j� "——-_——— - .. yes, 'L C'�1•4'•. —________`) ...,_.._gr:•:.„,,,,j,:0=:;;;;:ifir ••,..i.;..7 ...' ..:me,emq-_.-__=_::-..,_-_i ...........i. 1 i li 11 ,.::t...mim:m.. lipPor; Y ■d�iiill. ...y ��/�,/ _ 0000 1/y<rt•i -Afp_i o- , -°o 7 - -_ / --:`� i --_ III •°o°f:11: ' � K 0000• '. // �J.�t.fn,�r•�. _ 0000, .� :-- _ 0°0 ■■.� ■ ,-lop •F C.. _—_—_—_— 000. __ ___ __ _ ___ _ _ _ _ ■ .° ,��.�■■■ ,c, r o• [ II ,S ,C.F.I.' ___ nn000000nrlo'' ----- - �' •- • ■■■ •, '!.:r.• '[•;• (,., , Yi' n .Q - � nonoopono°nl'.f�� r■�1 •,f ( - ,1000000000000 -•.- _ _• - 8 ■ ■f■ .v �..tf•o`.,,u.�1� l:•� Ch• , •`—_— l00000000b0000'• — — --- - -- - - i � t. •� f'? Jr 'C�rC •• f 00000000000000 - ---- �•r, - - 6FF� ■ ■ ■■■■■■■■ 1� „<�•':' Isiz \ c, •_ 000n0000000000': •�:_ • . A -— �, S •0000000000000 i+ .. — : ■ 5 fff■Y ^ �,;. (,. {•� /�'� •• 000000n0000QA --- /_iah`: - :��a :■■■�•. '1 c , .�•f: \ • •000o0oo.rei e• - _� ■. ..n., i'` ,000 • • • • • . 0.....,,., ,„,. c,..., : .•• �e -.40114 ' i 'sown. -"' --- -L-_-_-_-_ -_-_-...-_-_: .:;- 1 EFT , .....: . #7: I r- ::-' ‘.:,..,------=====7,7--7.-7.-=-- -.: :--::: -::::-=:.-:: ':,:.'7:7: mg : % :::::!:':',1,,..,:,.i,': r ...... - �, , - - i`fIC6 0000 __ ,:r ii: 00 'II ■fi • '-• —_ _ non ---- - �i;::%;:;'i:r3'r • • • -- .. . - _ --- 0000 --- '-0'.ff ••••• I - = = •:, '��MI:■ ► .:•.'!1 L J "rJ^ - — —- --- •• lain ■,`4„', ■1i_ - ■ "� r •` •:•r•is r,i. ' ' / ■ [v•. ::,nn noon ■' ...;• _�. - -- - - --- - - '` 0000 ram•, I .:o°°u°°0 -1':•' • IT,, ■ I 1• h - -_-_ -_ fro°. E'•C•. °°0000 _ _1 • t'% 000 /y liLa! 1 7 r•iiii 1 II oo "r•y�[: •J.� Ir::� _ I�Y ■ ■ -- r1._�d --- 000°. C'�. ..,::: - i ,•, -MO-- -_--_- MPzMD-- _ 'ir. .., \,. ''� . i , __-'-• ,t ` �,• . .1). • •• t —_—____1__—_— --__ ___--__•-� ter. • LAND USE ELEMENT .```'`` " ssE9) 000: o ht ��_ :::: : "esiii==V{, r Pr ;pbbbb° ��_..; ppbbbbb°, 1 I °bbb°bb. :�:( Single Family � �� , Commercial °°°°°° • n 000000• �•r, v'� 000000•• ''f •,-.'- 0000000 l%%0000• ir.; �� J ' ' �°o 0 0 0000• . "J' `.�• Low Dens0 _ ity st o.... . poop . 1 , r Office / Office Park °°°° °°°°° r Q;;. —%- Multi-Family `\\\ ..... bbbb0. :::: :::: ,\\\ 10000.000000 7'Y+I f"'• , 00000 00000 •1•.• 0000.00000• ?.. Medium Density %0000 p° ' •- - ` -- %%%%boor c 3°°o°o°o°(°o°r Public/Quasi-Public ` ''<r l0000000 • ,, ° ............ Multi-Family bbbbbbbr, I , , «� :,• :, pour ft... }...r 1P :t ;. ; High Density Light Industrial °°p[ moim: Multi-Family g • °°° f ems,•i:t• .. J •N' Cv %' ;;. Recreation •'•'•'• Heavy Industrial I s.,� - - 0 • - 1 . I-•. E" °r Greenbelt =_-: Manufacturing Park b�.b • `:':i G%r.°v ---- - • °po 000- ' , / Multiple Option ` �bobab�b�b�0^. �- .:x_---- EPA' v ! C D `� E A F O H 1 PUG-ET SOUND - — / � O\ n 6 ! m 1 1 \\ • y •p • .i \%\ • SUryy Al SW s •• • 1 .BAINBRIDGE `- 2 \ '�' \ - • • a`. > \ \\ * %- •,NTON CTN.LI61in. �� 0 .- ``�f 3 Gk. \ \ \ • 4% a Bop BR RTON / II: C` • 0 �4ji \ \�\ �� //l BLACK (. NM7 \• ,1 1 S• \ ��`\ N�pe>i<O/ ��\ \ ��RRHRR ► J •• ` • ,n: ) \,,\ i� ( f�\\\ _. lOTON LIMiT /T�/ `�� • ___ ��' a . �` \1 •ifs , \ . -- _ - // , _` \ METRO PROPERTY LINE \ m \ SEA�TAC \\Q •RENTON / 1 I/ OAKESDALE RD `\l • // I MERNATI• • �\,.Q ,\ ,\ / \ ' -/ SW iF STRICT /L 4' AIRPORT ♦ LOCATION /� j Z F • VASHON 1 áOF WORK • \`I( 5 1 -/.%�r ISLAND 'LNG COUNTY V. `. • \\\\\ CITY OF TUKWILA �\ p° \P 3 ► �'' © / RENTON OEYORSTRATIOR \ y�, ' ,AUBURN /• ZOREST►ROJECT As m \ '/ RENTON SEWAGE \\� o 1 +.N\ / TREATMENT PUNT 1 aST TACOMA .•`� Iv JI \\ / r�1 ` \\•^f SW 3 '.� `�� f ` \ \ OQOOi \� G�OYWAY 3 l I 1 I •. "., 00 000 To I� PUYALIl1P�-� 1 GA'\\ • 1-1� f1 ! SCALE IN MILES 1 i� Q O II /� G� _ I 0 12 jas \ \\ Tr.\ r . % • /1 1 _7<1 i_y. 4 . �� \\\ T INTERSTATE FfMY 405 VICINITY MAP �� — \�\,\ S 1 :� Cg ORl ► '?0,/, /,�-�' �' �\ 'I I �� SW 16TH ST IS 153RD ST Jcl /I \ `17- I1 2 ( \ • \ 2 v . t \1 lr.---- ----''.. .1(fr 'C '''r --'4::::7't I a ,� \\ \ OD III > LONGACRES N .'= a RACE 11 • i ill s` ,I= 1- TRACK `\ • - i LOCATION MAP 0\ ce • - � -- - m If I - - -- ,061. 'I I OWE CfI r.\ I "s096•iUBMITTAL IFNTLLVE SCALE ACCORDINGLY i • IRTfAiERWIECISS0.ANH5 u' B-19-88 z RENTON Vftr DEMONSTRATION -MOW. � � TRIO d M•Ha@dRY$�•IfM - Osborn Roy. FOREST PROJECT a..,, , /•� . ••••. ' �' o1N16 , inc. ..�...•.• AS SHOWN PIM LOCATION AND VICINITY MAP$ ••••�••r•.• I °' Le s"9°"�°' RENTON TREATMENT PLANT G 2 •o •t•i•.o• IT )CITE _,.. — - __. __ — i • .w•t 2 OF 14 i e. A C D E v F O V H. ...,,, • ' . A El C 0 E F 0 H A • A A - A A A .A . . . - . . . . --............ ' . 7.--........-",...... --....,.._ 0 - INDEX TO SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS i . . 1 ---(•-.............. --,,,, --........ BASE I GRAM= I LAYOUT • ' s 0 __ ____ • __ . PLAN 5 • inixamit NUNBER I NONBER - -_____.__. . 8 , r ::77i' • - 1 ..._..._ ""..•.:'...7.,.• Yl.....---\ -.., 20 I NU 1 GS . I I `.4::;5 ,r.•\ 1510MAQ.S ......_______ . 1 • I '''..i•kt,f. OZMON6TRATiON ......_ . ..--. 21 I NU I G9 ‘•A \-- ---..... •.. .., 0.• . ...." -7 -'1\1 7): 'r\ ....1 TEA 1.11TH CONTROL AREA . • 111i i 40,1!*4- ... - 28 . G4 I G0 . 203140/1-A.6 Wig 11 N;+ ‘k, \ . 29 I •GS I G11 - VEMONGrIVATION ; I . I 'sy 1 ___,.. -. . . -..—.------—----------------- AREA 141T.1.4 c.om-ncoL:AREA ! . I -4,"--- 30 I G6 I G12 -....„. -,. . ......... . ' LEGEND ... a /V);, " .. .. • • ,.i, .f/.0. • . . ..---- : a • ..., -....... /‘ - • V I. . .... .........-- -_. r- —--- • I 0, -r.-, _ _. _ - _._• - , ei . . , ,--- .-- , • .,. :, - \. -: ... - • . . _,.... _ %\t.- .• - . - Il ' . _......• -- . - 3 - III • 3 . it a . 1 fi 0 . . . , // . a 8 4 a aa . ' • ,,,a . - q . / I' .5 . ,E H57 PAT ' .:. • . // 2 2 . // . . .. // 7 ...- . . . . . _. .. . • , .. .... st . ... ,, • • _ \.....1.... . - 0 .- -. -.. _ .., - •-: - _. 4 - . .7--,7.- . . . - . . . 7------3-- -----' , ------- - .. . .\.. • 1 .• _ ,. -- . \ ...............__..--_-__„...--.,. •,... - 7 . . I , . .. • ... - . .\ CV ..._ , ..- .-- ------'- \1 __......- ------......- ----'• • .........-------- - .4 --- , _-, - _--___,-, -.., _ . _ , ....------...-\./ „ ., ,' N------ , -- v , ;--: -- :,:-.. 1 9Q8UBMITTAL . RENTON DEMONSTRATION Ile%METRO. Mani 01poll ty of IletropoL 1 ton SeattLe 43-19-98 U:ITECFPE FRICKE ER.FRERS Na..... perm. tenx. ma/ OAR Osborn&Roy, FOREST PROJECT D.R. I t!!".1" I.• 100. ,11.3 r ....005 . 1 , Planners, inc. REccw. . • ERR.,.RENTON TREATMENT PLANT MASTER SITE PLAN AND INDEX G 3 .. I MIS. . ,F.,4 PAsS404.l....Sec...Wasnngton0813" . A6.0•40. W/M20-138 .61..... 14 In 1 R I CAM I t En:. OFF, . V V H • A 13 C 0 E . F G . • F - A AA £ W A - „.�oa \\r. ' - • \ • \ I :k ��` Nt300 • I ).. I( ) ¢ • Nt000 !II �. „ I + , �g� I • 31 plin.!-1-ttird'i• ... .-,11'4Folliiii, - , 2 . • • N 800 - OQ Nt00 Z: �t,ES.:7.1 I - �, / / ¢ • 1.lu1.i c►•=14 L. - / !p : . 1111®'®- * / ;/, . � Cl TOO 4. 1 . - . . . , . 1- /, i ..1,7, , ` it I§ /I/ • N 70• / J / i / r B SvBs I.• N1300 , / C f • I / / u � INl34E l o RI oil �sWs�� lE�ag I / / • iI �kr4k li$Rl9Jl$Rt I gs5tbitkil is I2 i / a s \ . • //: • I " -Ig . • . • • �o0 6�kkk k •ss�i3kx kkiGlo8=iis. - I - g NA9 i I .i. . ( (il ! . • i 1V 10�V1•yu``� NPG AA.0 ■ N`tQo \' A ! ^�� i,••Ll iti • III / ��M,�t00 / / . / / ' c ('4 .11 . . pgj pp (qj(jyyp �+ q qq yy}j�( YYY / /-, / 11 L'sma:.y:tilys:kxtittaGykttx5Ci2yG:. I. \ ,'\c ( g ► • 1 • vtLloo '' - • w Joo 1 1 ! \ \ i mor Giiib1i$RGRaByl •��41i4 655 le / 1 \ _ rCg 1 �1 � • Ntioa • 7 N • OO ma3 /... • I I \A••\� aa ► \ \ \„in • , 1 / t N .p moo 00 r 11/ 11/1 .• y/•II , , , I + : i i \mZ _ _ P.S.P.l L. 2J0 KV /" .� `-N:oo IY , . • / /. , 1. \ , ..., \ ,c - ;11RvItA , ,i a' \ `',/ii/( \* \ \\ HPLcc: I Wp0 �' f I r f I i r ri m /' 0 1`I I I i J `C^v in�@ I1h g .n F E /% I I!l t I I I I' I I I I � �1 Vj/ Y ioo 4 iil � il)1l1/ . %• h • IA 9 - A [ A O1.1111 1 EA F A G IIMS I. • \ I TdKMG- _ _4 - _ _` --- _ _ — _ _ I - — IZO I I MATCHLI� _ all �d� / . I / / I in.. EX. W. E�6,E I • ®PIPE■. • s • iY�11 aenn- ® ' l I I I OD ( MLLOIJ 6MlAL1; r I 5 • ��I• y�,}�dim / / / z �— EX. I I I .� -�� 5iy�� Y'/ / / I / 1 / /0;• • TWIN EX. /, N. OF NAt°I-b \'i I I I (/�� -(+[IEEE I' I APPRbk• 6OIJhDAKY / �IILqa • I/ L IAtal4 ` AbH \ I/• MGG7-AND + }v MTC // 9 III I EXKJTIN6 PSGR \ • \ f f)MAPLE ��I I E H MIDrCA I V ®OR[ �iNOtM OM TMIO FLAK /1 TYPICAL AEON `•J + II �l$j I }- 'CET PLAN / I �� NDKTH E'Ive, I ' —�� a �1--• 1 4 i, NO■uu I I /AI' ,s is , 4/7/ __-- • ' J/ APPRox. bouNw,.RY' •:• I / L //o / J• / .See- 5PGGIFILATION�y A{�I!_41SclEHHNT / f / Z� •�J� Pa 1 ' APPLE j ��HH LANDr cA PING, BIND j �, J� - �^ , �w - .—- _� .jRF[IfjAT.ION ! ? + / /, �P7 1 \. .•'rA� • 1lE.C.�i•iWP'LE I /tio) . / / ' . OA t FR L. I{. � K LII.AIT LINE 1�� V / / Meer AND / kW) A %0.,''..F. - • .\ -- ..• I ./-• / _ T f �A NOTE : :PIO `�^� EX leTINU' 3 = -` ' r+'•�� . _. L e'4 LL TS E2S INS®G ` ``� PAVEME 7 s' • r9 _ OF WORK LIMIT LINE / AT FINE - / TO 0e REMOVED PER ELEVATION l I / p4- -1_o G15 SPEGI PIGATIONA-ri.i NO Z 3 NDRK LIM 17 LINE I� I P4 *P92AND PANOIrr P AN reN! I/ Fogz PATH LANVINIs• \r 3 :....:"....7..,...:..,...___.&,.........c.". - G� LGGATION4a. I . 4 • I,b pc.,.Z oO.82 B4 // PI GZ7 Pr�304.EZB7 • /Re I I F(f� ><1s9.5 �. - pT 3G0.2714 I I 2 i III f X�tx+� ) * K-4•�r` \ \ - �- ---1 �\ z . /�, ,7 I„6 „ I R z � _ 1.`i i� �! ` ```. - / // 2 • •.f� 4" +•t,._r� "�y"!,� }I. L fl a Gaf3o�8\1\ ._� -' - -O ' '' •'r 144. `, > t-no . T'`.'` ..,� ! L•_.87 5079• \ F- �^ ` -7s"P - �a MD), " \`A�+. / '�, _ \:��` •A34.2507 PG 37.2aG9\ 1 X--'-..,,.„.. - - _ :jam - 7_' - -_r_ - Q r r It., � L•7 IZ4 7l • FtK88 4G3� ► -1,-. APElCDX.j60uNDA RY • r � _� /-_ � / HG. * /1425 it:\ Pr_•2 ao714bb4i LAND��'GAPE AND ".J- __ l� _. // '.%. IRRI(oATION-.GEC -/. ��3!'EGIFIOATIO/K, [J}APpKOx: 'I- J(-- eNLArt&emaNT•mVir CONFIGl1KATl0 ♦�8 — ''(Hz) I�b: (50 / �- �' L NDscAPIN(fJ_. / ZONE. -O29 _ /�� - //�F// „ ,e( K �•II C'J2 T.,,\. NHS•' --�� , / IRtgILOATION I •_ 'ram _�� /_I / I \ EE 6Nc, c om Fog. 4E7-R0 a CoNT./AGTOKTO VERIFY EXI6reNGE' I Q / , - �• _ _/-' �'' ((44 " \ CII l� (�RADINlO 0002DWATE�. C" LOGiTION OF HeArs ANP / 7 `�I �- 1 I • (4, WORK LIMIT LINE ,TO SE RETANEot \ / "'��— j1 15E 0 g "^',^--_ T' Z1rr- AP APPKOPRtAT£¢ I No/C9ICOI11m Td f G7 X (�4G) (IIe) r WORK S^ �•�•• ••.,;;.*� ' Ic oo I Y PRIOR A ,A ., ITH / / Cf-iiN-DM tot / /. ��—_ 4 • I ) -- /5A) (s+ /j�IMT LINE He 141 '0 �rM9'ETA WFf}IIN-DM LRIP{JNE / / /•. MATG HLINe �, __ Orys re e0,0 GONBTKIJCTIOoI \`. / / M / =_ / ./ j- e , P® / `�gTGHLINB� • 7, - .� �.' ` � ` /' >,�`—_—� % /� si0% 8 BMITT/je /\ ":I N ` LAN 21\ • 1 s. lAT5CFCEFRCHIEC156KRNHS RENTON DEMONSTRATION 1E5 F R. g�METRO Municipality of r.t,OpOLlten SAG UI. r".s-(9-89 Eon... rirEMED. SCALE. 'ME.Y. . 1 Osborn F7 Roy, FOREST PROJECT ,tr°D' R. I••zo' o• r Mtn III '-- I • I I Planners, Inc. `■` LWTG,Rb. GRADING PLAN 2 G5 1ND MI.Flown W.,.stare.Wosr.•g[on4B101 RENTON TREATMENT PLANT .ncllblen b. I Atm. I n I wt[ ws W/M20-BB "a•5 C.Is .co....,,.. �.. � e V V V- EWA V 7 c e e F I c „ A A • e A o • NW - [ A r A s. is • / / ' I • I ----- --- . _ • _ : Imo - % . !' /�(9°C4).195--� / •�®OO••• •O•••••••�••• �irzo. ; NOTLAp,7GWLIWE JJII HYVRObeEO WITH QMA�a s - 'Q� ��ers,, ,r' / �ICII / to i•l�••0 ••�0••,e••••••••ScP G�I *!! L5 icoLP Nd • s �r�' 6BRvtce. Aue®E, s..gs.r.,..l• • • ! •• eALL AK6 ou¢NCB /' /"� ^�stoKkN PERT.• AT{E/AmW . - I , I iiretsireed.4. rscaq� _ _ . ' rra� .• ,, /,,,.. , *die •-• . 0.••••.: . ' I ' H ' 41 . • ONLMOZI • l / . ��' 11 i: "Noiredo•'•• �••��• ��• •�� 1•••_ • f' I I ; i r oho ■M[�'�"O�If`, .TI"� � ./ ,i !bP N0.G � ' • • •••� �• ••, ••• •• �•••• ••►"- �yo o_ :' DA1NDAlICY POST •••�••/ Aik•• ��. •••-•�i��O I � • ,�• e' al in �p TYrr-AL •or D • � •lingbMWS — •fir r f .v 0) • eve 'K �. • �4 r• /, i Q (Mg/0 'UP �olimir•��y�`=wr:_ _-`��>er .,pl,4—;-y,- O • oOr+• T •• - �CIOMAS COATIICOI- PLANTMb AREA� Y -t-.'• / .. ,s'ee Nit 5/ / ,---, sat ,--,'' III ,--,`-I 0 n "7 0 e Ogi---vir •-- ---...• --------- 4 ----::.'":- ''''''.Z."---=. . LeeV(1 -Na 6 O O O O O ' �• i�/- r:.% ' \ \•'\. �1-, `41ATGH ANv 6�END: -- /'�• lI / /�/ O,01 O „` O o O O O !- 11, ,•/� J v /...--- 'TY.PI[A nNTIRE I ` -roKOADhIAYNa, AccEbc. r _/•• /_�` PATH.45'�•EM '. I '�.1 3 /� r Q / / odic_SJ `� '.E4444, s%/'•: ft• --- \- K GAVE .CALVE,2'�N/L crr.lp - O /' v CIOMA6.e / • -i>� T'FKA � IflrcebPTATE� SAND pu1cK-CouPLSR dYSYEM V DEMON6TRATION / • -. n' _�� Vie TO-E%Hb+Yvm e •JTUG-Our �� PLANTING AREA •l+� J ' II • • - ;pkt � -IFI(O-"fYP/—�` ON 4•G4 P1PGAT Y N 1�0 • _ 1 1 _ •CONTRACTOR T VlLIe1PY 'NV NT /'• ,a -' '.F+t50, ;` ANa NORI30NTAL ALIVNI..,ENT y , I•e� _ r ., I i,• /!, ��--�_ OF`�\IbT4�16 4'G4 PIPG. I ' -yllS r.-.c-i�M CND PATH NO.2.-MATCH • a '. �, " / —� FIELD I.: i�E.t4c. TO EXIbTIN6 ELEVATION cO e •• , �'• / '.AND TRASM,REGHPT/�GLE ► •,�� _ n L__: .!y(Sl'dj„ rJw• A6 arRCGTED�f•LONt.T�YCTION • CZ: ROADWAY • i1� N P;; C 15067 - ... PedlejlEre. / '. " ./1A140-1114MMO.......t.i::4441_Si;"'... : :"-, ‘. 0 eticHQ ' -.. --. ,. _• •• I '* � %'�"%�� 3llfrm,' TIfAt H RECEPTACLE . / •----- -' ----.-.-7-"•••--- -. • .. .. - \ - .0.1-4... 1-N p-ritip--'4.• 10 (Nr 11-60040. - - -.- .- reVATION. //DINT ' —._-• . - _ I ► HYD eo SE6v W17H 7NEJ?P ! �i \ r TIJ O O • � :. ,-{ . \ • _ LAWN.MIX PER . - ` / '�' ♦�' �• TVI!1 \� .. PGGIPICATIOPI,=. r�� ` ♦ i �_i O �` v O, � .(•.�, .\ L�!�.-r-'_ 4[0 • _� � \ aEMOWS ' DEMONSTRATION-f�t.ANTINCO '��\- / ` � t gte• ARO" O ./ � - a►.,\., ,Th • _ � _ � , • • O • r %GP_ f _ - :.4p e — cic ' Mom• ....,+ �_r • Fox LONTCOLPLeTINC7 ltL — - BOb N11TTAL: : ' LAN 29\ - DEsro>ED. -\7 -DATE: I LITIDSCPPEF CHTECT56RHJLiS RENTON.DEMONSTRATION F.R. I .,�.m E T A O A.IHIpuLlEa of r.v.poUtm __� s /9-es �. FIB«o. Osborn &Roy, FOREST PROJECT 1 D.R. F.R. 1., zo' o° r b,,,„��, j Planners, inc. �,r,,,C„„, LAYOUT AND IRRIGATION PLAN 5 GII Z W. .Isla n '44 aws.o„woe Seaton u,owalo,oero' RENTON TREATMENT PLANT .wo.Eu. � I I m Id I, a ETA• E . DI.. - ..� , V 9 V C V D T •E • F � G - H _ .. i - — C D 13 A' E _ • /r— -- A . A . 1• 1 . _ . MI ..•.) 42/ . I ' ' . . 1 1 __ _ _ . _ _• . - • LI • _ I • — V! - - :--.-..' . - • - • . • . . . • _ . s . '1.7.r.. ,--r.•-i ...- 'r----,,,,sag..7.7i1ZEI • • . . • En:g2Iiilt! K HEM : • • :. . • . . . i . . . • .s . . rut-- am.;;a= • •. • . .• L_J • • . ..Ali. =E.7:11iCE . • - . • • . . + . .. : :1. - ± . E 2000 + . . + II kiii 11.10 El.7 7-..&1 4- . . ICIZIMMi - ' .. ± ii 1 . . . . 4 . , • . • • •ANNA INOWN ON Tint PLAN • . .. • 1110 KEY PLAN . . . NN*NUL . .Z •. . . • ' .71 . • . . • ' .. 2 .'3 . ; 17. ..1..I - . . 4 • • . . • •. , I . • 1 I • -- . . . ± il_ K + . ± ± + . E 1900 IP' W . ... ___ 3 "-----..-......., ,. 7 ....., / ---...----.''. .--'---------././ /7-..----°- . /- , L ,____ . /,:::, , . , . , ./.. . ____ ± - , . . . --1 . , ... I : ._.., - , _________ • . ...., ........... -4- ++/ ......_ E 1800 4- ---/. • - . 2 .... di .........7......----,---=----------"--....., ''.....,, 7ffisa•Trr %,:s, . . 2 - +i -7- . -..„ \ _.. ___-----_---- ----...... „ .. . .1 ....-- ..--....- .....-- . -., \. . a........ ,....... ,...,- -- \...,.,.......":„._..._, rC-.. s....... '''.. .• ...----1,----.<:"...--"•.-- ..."-•`........ ....., -----"'•••• ...----------- .--... ........- ...../..., ....." . g....... .. . ---,------1"----1..._=-- --..------- ----\_ PATH •••-.. ,.. . • a•••...,.NO.4 , 42 -re.Aus c4'4 .0>i- 04 l'°t'D • . . v.140101/41.re= .1....1 • `‘....... .."........................ 0°,.... \••••.. ..\ .....„...--........-..._....„. • ....... Ii‘ ••••., ......--......./...'-':-......"..........." ----- ' Z \. N., 4•11.. eND PAT 440.1 ..... I ••••••••••' ....."-----'------------..... + . • E 1700 B.G49IN PAYPI. .i . ..._„,....- ...,_„,.........„-..--.- • 4- ± +• •. ----.-' ..--- •-• \.//;..•/•••••• ..•-•-• ....7..... —. \ \\131......„---. •. 1-CHLIN \ ../''.e7Q r?. . . o S00% SUBMITTAL. 1 MATcHuNe- \ _.----'-'zi \ 1 .."----- g . li PLAN 21 . Ii 11TE.13-/9-85 157095PEFFENTECISVRYNNERS • RENTON DEMONSTRATION - F.R. *METRO MullalpaLltv of Netropoll tot Seattle I Osborn &Ray, FOREST PROJECT • • :i 7G16.6 keLt. c2; 01F.R.. .• '- . r • . B1.11:1*'11:Pa). 1 1 Planners, inc. 1 20 0 RI EMMET.4• - 1 I I ... RE11151111 I " "" 1414 Pioswon Wog.Searne,UJosmgronC8C1 RENTON TREATMENT PLANT LAYOUT PLAN 3 • IF/i1/. F-14ift• wim20-88 • G 9 ••••• A V 8 C • 0 E F .-. - G M • • . MATGNLIN� �`=` `_ ! `lalilPe y•T�• ejIMI�4 �, •� �i/ PIPE/ __MISCM1. _- _ _ _ _ l_ / - ,_ ,` �+� ��• a si ��►',�0�fah., fro �"%\ \ •! `��` HYMC,OfrP�fl W Na �r • 01. ��,�%�' , r�Jly pau6L� FIR- aNsm\roN \ b'GL`D mix.THC'flEMORT10N • ��' - „��1�� A�,il _,_� ! ANTIN[s AREA, CONTROL PLANS+Kla.AR6A _ 1 INe. AReIa.bE AhID ALL 17Yr1422G-a`D /I _ _ �•`ARH TUR6E0 DURING •�, IL= -- \ - -__ CONEt71000T1 R ��'PEGFIGAT.IL �. - ' n .w�`•.• { I _ / • `\ `-�,�` f�eeen , .aL�lE.Z"��tc•PrPE, ANa _ /{ / 1 1, • GIWGR`- �...,- " hTEM TO EXvjTINls --' 111 C�_� ' ` ` 3`B7••- ONj-- PIPE- _1-�--1 1'7 /t It, ', , --®-- GONT,iOL�PI• Ji ep-+lR�•• / I -% --iE � I32;::-1B=-;'_!lint _______ . ' . --------- ., --_ _ _----- -- • Q ILv 0 i. • I • Nil A ■•.[a.prom.on TMI.KAN • - . : Fr • • '� _ PLAN 261 . t! . • A • •• -- Boa - • 484, k0 t. • 2 �a 3 00" j. 7 �. id. • . • • vi n 1 - . n • � . . r. o o SO% SUBMITTAL • ® • _ _ . : . PLAN 6 f i ~lam ffCli{TS&PWIEAS RENTON DEMONSTRATION oESEoFR•KNELLED. I 3.METRO M..IclpaLityof Metropolitan Seattle WE.aJ9-sa I (PAM ELLED. ;5WF. r =,.M. o i Osborn &Roy, FOREST PROJECT D.R. I M.W. ! ,•=20,_a• Pico-Mato. K DG..IM M. Planners, inc.xn �,,L P.O. LAYOUT AND IRRIGATION PLAN 4 G IO M. se � N RENTON TREATMENT PLANT Iw�Mzo e9 irtEiM,10[FKq slLr Kn D i rt l .aocov[o. - A f1 C - U r E,ap. E.fF� :1., - �— E F G N "11111M A_ B A • C - -.A O E • F - S N "///‘ _ / _ _ • / I A, - — • .. cm...________- - II, - - /KG=-MA EMI //,/, . .• - ,, jil: . . . _ • _�1.Tr-V t - aP ys--ss..�GSlai�i / e - �� P / .: . . ' W � ;. •/ $ / • ,AREA OHOI/N ON Erne PLAN - • KEY PLAN SO SCALE • / / F2]oo /1 • ,' ,� I ,/ • . . / _ j / • / / i I I I• � _o I / ___— • / / j I I �. r— • APrKDX. 6O R OAR4 /%' LAN78GAPC ANO IRRIbA.TION I I L i SEE SPECIfIL ATIDN�j, - I L._ / EN LAFE&E.MENT =.-II / ' / LANroeGA (� AN PINo IIERI&ATioN " " • • eti / 1 . 2 4 / /� / I • CP / 2 y /j. 1 MEET AND MATCH O WORK LIMIT LINE /- ._. To .5%IeTIN6 EARTH PERM • • G15-A TOE OF FILL 6LOrE; !!I(O • `� • E200 / G+I -D l I Epp ' G2:1 SLOPe-M47C-T�/C°� I •(A'4-4) PIPE • 614 H2O 1¢0 TOP OF' WILL. I C4u ��P I •SEE SNGET # FOR.' LIMIT6 OF W /K • _ �/, • R-�I C�17 r.J' I (pKADIN0 LOOBLEPINATEE• 2X19TINeo EL.•W.EDCo6 SHALLOW SW ALE, I /� MO tilt)�_�_� `x III % + 4. 12D III o 90%. SUBMITTAL =I PLAN 30 let _ uriTALA°EFRORECTSER.R 1S , RENTON DEMONSTRATION F R. O METPO Municipality Of 1»vopoLIten 5.ottL.Owen rs.. � 8-/-f-68Osborn E Ray, FOREST PROJECT ,•=zo-o• !r „,Is� • Planners, Inc. GRADING. PLAN 3 In w. I IGIA FEcvwn WogSconi¢L•rovnaton981p1 RENTON TREATMENT PLANT- G 6 •t.tslo• n I OM •CI•.vEU• W/M 20-88 9ct*•c,6 a-,,• ,•..w•� i,r r. _ EK., 1•P. In. A B C 0 E F G N •- - A A '• . . . • N . _ • A :IMI A ... • . . • . . . . . . . . . el 11 II II II 11o1 11 I/ • II II • • . g il a (--) L) (..) (,) .(:).•(.71) . . . . . B • . • . • ' z • . . .Z1 . ' -• _ . .. _ I- _ ____. ___ _ - ' • . .•.. . .. • • / - . .s . 110. • fi .--. 41--FL; rrli •10 0 3 , • i ::: L.& LI-rz 4-r! .---11-- . . • ... •r71-1 17.7 -111211 ' - • • lirn .1 . . . .. . . ' - . .: . Z ' . ,. ..I :.% ;: IIIII '- I:i i! • . . FA:::..:1Irg ;.:.TIMM . . - . • • - . . . . •ace.=!:...-.:.,:.-:iiin .1' . . .. ... . • - Liam %i•vimil ,... . • . . . • • 4 . • . nur:iisk .. • . .. P - - . • _ . .. • - . . NM ' • •. . . . . . • • . • • WWI*SNOW*OM TOMB PUM1 + - • . • ' ' .' . .r . • . • ' . L-- . )1 LuN ± I ' ' ' I . • I ! ' . . • ' -. . . . . - . . . . ; 11 11 11 11 ;I il ii ii ii 11 • • . ...._ --- . - 7.: i 0 c c..., c . r..1 C:.' 51 E.' 7., CI 2 C., • I . 1 7 1---- -1 4---j--. --- • . _ . , ..,- . • , L—__ —, I •`.:..--. . 10 . IF—- . • ' -.....: 1 ' - ! -• . .— ... F.-- I ! • T. --•—. I. • — 1 i (--..--11-- --71--- . 3 • I 1 . I I --- . . I 11 I I i i 1 I; - , - Ei500 I . • .--i— I • 1 .4Th rf, ' %....4. . • .• . • 1 : 1.7----, (Th. • ! irili . •, . . . ( ) ....01 _....__. - ._.1 /' • • .. I _r_LL..jhr--,__.________F, 1__ L.J. . ., . / > .. . . : . . -_ - . •• . . . ..: .. -...• ,, : , :: , 1 _ / > / . .. . ‹.. . . . • :; ,, . ..., . 2 - • 0° ' i •. I 1 • . ' ;-1.i-1. - •,./\ .. 2 • A. Ntit1:41 : I • ,. . . • / PATH NO I 1I Tix . .. / ., ., . . . , 1, 1 •::' Z-. I/ .' \ \ \ +Seems 41o.'NIDE . 1 { —±, • • .1' , 1 \ /I • 6.‘, - COR•41/LL. VAIN AT N 1206 6.12.71 - - • 1-----I . .%.,\ • PA-I-N No. f , . . -- • 4 — . -_____i ::" 1 • . . . • • - . - -' _.1 .• 4-°, '..-:. .\'''''A. .--„ tir-xr•-rgttPgeD • °+"1--1 -.-- ------7 1--- ( i 1 . — \ \%\s\as%--rye •I 1 . • - . • __._._ 1 ° • / --> • •\ 0 . I I ' ...........---7 • \ ,, 0,. ' • . .•. ‘ 4L-..%•., 1 • • • . - . /' • • • . . I,.., .• — . • • 90% suemrrraiv PLAN I 4 • •• . - . ....;17 . • ...... _ _ - JP. - unioPEFRafrEcrthetweees RENTON DEMONSTRATION . . . ER. .._,:.4rMETRI3 141..101pea1t9 of 114trOpealteri Snoittla /5-0-8.5 .10. . D:R. F.R: ---. Osborn&Roy, -FOREST PROJECT : . r- 20.-0'10 FAL n LAYOUT PLAN I Nkoro.ro.Planners:inc. • .\..9 ;NM%goo Way.SAW.1.1.109.1540.913101 RENTON TREATMENT PLANT . Fla 11541510. • R I DOE • Vi/M20-86 7'14 0 Inol. FAA, 4101. Ina MonlIt 1...a•=MO I 'i V V V A e C 0 E F G . 11 \ '-= _ MAT ILI C_ \ 1 /��' ter.. • .�.I _ __, -- _ _ \^ _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ =_ _ _ - -_ _ -_—_ =_ _ MATGHLJN6_ ' . • \ 'J./2./7' . ...... J i 1 - ` L// --- ---•---------------_.. ----- ...-- N ••.. . _{.. �`� • �1� —tom T I N C/ 0 � • q` 4 =—�= ce — 4 —=i=� =' • • �I ��• •`• ` _ al I t •�, � ,__��' o PATH NaNO. { © I> < -I. \.%%.\ • 0` ` \+ / II I *O C ISN E IEN •N • C ♦ \ s • • �A1MiK M \ �N. \ s<:s:m.. Elr �C � `i \ ► . 1111 AREA.KEY PL AN$PLAN \ N. }\ }\A • 21 - N _ SO% SUBMITTAL g `` �� PLAN 20 • . I•a urosEF+eRRO-REE15ERxrss RENTON DEMONSTRATION F_R. `�/��ITIETFIO �EnielpoLltyeiNEYepEL IEv SEt[LE y�'b./9 BS Osborn&Roy, FOREST PROJECT • o.R °`F.R. _ 1.=ZO._a. r Planners, Inc. °"°"` • LAYOUT PLAN 2 "r "0' ICIa Roganuay.Seem.ulosr.gtonoenl RENTON TREATMENT PLANT W/M20-BB CalaM b. G 6 m, I •Ev1s,a m niE WET rot,8 �`14 jILG. EKF. 4Ia. BA C • V 0 E F G H A A A A C 0 'A E A F A C " 6' EFROL0 ON 3(v' INVIANOLA 501E TVIP "HAUL ROA2 OP LOU& FIR r:skiONE.TRATION AREA ' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ EXCEPT DOU(o. FIR CONTROL AREA —� —=.1/407,1.=1 - _ _ —Cr' B2000 !0 ON 9 ' INv7ANOLA 901E-TYP• O� 160 OF BIOMASS' DEMONUYRATION AREA S EXCEPT bIOMASZ CONTROL AREA. FINISH C9RACt: G4 P1P6 s —Re INv1ANOLA SOIL-TYP • I40 OP 61OMAec CONMOL AREA _,.. �� 42' INDIANOLA 011..-TYP OP I DO b/� II . FIR CONTROL AREA i� I'30 • •_ / ma---. _____J�� EXI9TINlO CVRADIC 110 • ' SECTION A-A GALE: VBRT: I'=lo'-Od HORIZ.: I'•20'-0' 0.00 1.00 L.00 3.0o b+O0 S•oo Ca•DO 7+00 g+pp 4 150 Norm .�� -- 160 ► 145 �� 145 \ Nil ,cllf- -- -.11111.=ft -M11.1M i 140 _ 140 _= S —..EINEn 1 3o -"MEN 130 I _ia S i ► s 125 I I I I �r�M�� 129 ��-- 1� I 7 i �� I PATH NO.2 PROFILE STA.0400 TO 5475 ENc PATH NO.2 AT 2APPROX. N 1970, E 1646 7 SCALE: VE(tT: I'I"G'-O• MEET AMP MATCH 70 HORIZ: I••80=0• APPROX. EL. IZSAT 4 ► • 1 1. 90% SUBMITTAL. .alam. uro5c» prcHlc>scaaa+sts RENTON DEMONSTRATION F.R. =P11ETRO MloI poll ty 4F Ntt'ep4lItan Seattle ��'3-/J-eb !urn 'Cantl➢• sc... rill W. Osborn &Roy, FOREST PROJECT D.R. F.R. AS SHOWN �`t'r`p"' TE LAYOUT CROSS SECTIONS Planners, inc. CO..,�.�.tr� DR..Iw.O. enO. .nlsa VI PM 1414 Fwtwo,U t Seam LUogio aon08101 RENTON TREATMENT PLANT tea• W/M20-eB G 13 �K ra..r,.•r 7 - _ EDS. EKS. 4' 9Eer lo.13.14 A B C 0 E F G M • A C O I— E F o N 0_ 1 -- / // I — Ira -�--®- ; . / . , • • ' AI —I ..' 5.21111g .' . ' - r---- • f - / ` AREA SHOWN ON INNS PLAN / KEY PLAN /1// . NO SCALE• / -+- ± /1 ,, • / /' . / . Loop I j 1 �' 1 II r---— . j / / L— �' •I � I / p TMTt EMON�TRON PLAYTIN� I °pt� AND AL.4.RE 5 fl.1f{JROEv • • GORING, GON-STRl1C.TION ff Ni / , // 6P2ct FtCATION. , 7TOE Or FILL- R=A3' po ..."...---. ...--.:h / 1 I t G21 SLOrE-TVP� I -110---_ — —120—— 1 ERVICE,'/IGGF�h6-TVt? t (q N U) PIPE C l t ® $IOMABh i7EMON67 TION AReA / 117 -.--f�/�O �� °�O (456° O O �O O \ \\\\' '.�4 d c4 PIPP t I / v t O00 OO � O O OO t INeIDe: :a 20 •TYP• q /. . / _,_ ' MATC}I LINE / :I / �9 .• ' =I MATGHLINE =I II PLAN 30' "� ^� • IRO% BUfMITTAL s u F+o+IcasER.FME S RENTON DEMONSTRATIONF.R.�� a44P n u METRO Mani Ua,.r P.t.op. t s..ttt. "�`8-tv-ea t,E b, Osborn &Ray, FOREST PROJECT D.R. M.W. r Planners, inc. 1 � I'•zo' o" LAYOUT, PLAN 6 "��'�12 I I W/M b. ac wow s.«m w. �a cent RENTON TREATMENT PLANT SrcT n Iz°la ,o� I cmisio, I m o.rz W/M20-88 �.�,.. A V A 7 C 0 V E F V 6 7 • H i A B A C _A _A_A E F A G A X 10'-Od IO'-O+ a + 111M1-- M='. GKQ•O- - - - it _ - - . T-, L• ' 0 0 - to r _ _ 1:7 -0" r • i._En,im.h.i."i 7 p �0 - 3-O IN71ANOt! 31-G . INDIANOLA ; ``pi.■ FILL. FILL m, r 5 = _ = - _ s •' • �l�Ii hLtCC9ILTADE u 6UDbRADE. : '>.n-u \ .,r its - A .Q 0 O DIOMA95/D FIR PLANTING AREA, GONTICOL A1CCA5 .b a b _tea IAi SOL 80 6'CONCRETE PIPE O CROSS SECTION OF SOL HORIZONS PVC-77P. CLASS F WM 4 IOLo' 10LO" NO SCALE. a.4� NOTE. POPULAR INW11. &WALL ES14;PLANTED Co" INTO THE 6otL. - I . 4G' MAX.-T4R S O DUCK COUPLIVG VALVE R-ANTNGSPACNG .1. 2'xG'I HEADERE0 . -- KJD 6CA1...E OA BIOMASS AREA No GjGAt.E /V37;//�//%. - FINISH GRADE 4 a - - - - I=o, N �' 2' lei n 0I_01 gt-O■ Ti z'x4' SrL1GE-U'NAILSI_ In N 11- J. 3b" TyP 1 Ill fl n = �r= III BAG.%FLL tram SUTABLE E%CYTED -'III III MATERIAL,ADEconteT COMA CTED. .13 GO _ Ill - 1 f �u G @ 1(1.01 COMMON (9ALV.. NAILS w low �I TRACER *IRE OR DETECTABLE TAPE Q Llit 111 �� `� In I, COMPACTED CRUSTED GRAVEL R (oo C- bo' D or e. I - } 4T-Ol � r �4l• A, III O ; IRRIGATION PIPE ' PATH Q. Q 0 I _ I 111 : • •:'1 IL: II _ _ - _ _.' EXISTING SUBGRAOE p. ; • ! III :'L.J �11 GOMPAC ALI �iuEuiICADE J nl :n I G TYPICAL TRENCH DETAL DOWNSTREAM OF R.C.V. 3 3 4-hTAEALMEIP A6GRE ATE U nP • .�It■ d I-DI OT-O. - 19AE GOIIe6E - - - ' - � - + �I O. NO SCALE • 2"7C4'IX 181 STAKE 24 DO J 2'X41 Doti& FIR HEADER804RD METAL (r UPPOI(T To CC (PRe LII E TREATE3�,OTANDARD OR 9ETTER� CENT'CRGD IN CONCRETE FOOTING. • PLANTING SPACNG SECTION A 'FORMS AND��I RFAGES-NIMBER AM ZO76 FINISH GFAE^/ ,CD4 ' DOUGLAS FR AREA PATH DETAL No ScAL..e O - • O TRASH RECEPTICLE SGALL: I''I''-O" NO SCALE. `^. fOLM CAP, &ALV. I57CEL y. VALVE KEY N -toIlrf M' Z' - cIRGI%.AR NON-LOGKIN(D VALVE CAP . 2 �O .._....••.......... T CONCRETE / - — TT �'•ierr-•rJ!"MiY CONCRETE SUITA9LL fL p'TYP. ;r4cKFILL 2 t ::•:-:-:••:•• �9 E.ALVAANIZEG 6HG 40?iPL ' li- '' IRRIGATION -_ - Z fib.OD. Ti :E pIPE SGHED.•40 eve8E DIA. ....e -• �...•.a - 'It THAMN.N 2I LARGE¢ D I ,,. ... /✓•. - •s:�•+-•_o.T.:.t ...'•� "•• 0 •,- - - THAN I' NOINION PIPE (--GRAVEL PATH -ef ._- _ - -I • 'AND EXTENDING 12' 'FORMS AND huKfA•CE•NLIM9ER6 A.4001 AND A .6011 �,' 6LEEVE IPG BE='t'A.D PATH OR RDAD EACH END. I GRATE BENCH IRRIGATION SLEEVE DETAIL - WO 6cAL. . IN15N d.RADE. VALVE KEY I - NO gcALE I' KGY HEAD la • Q •I I CONCRETE FOIOTINb .11�1�1wi, W. MIL PrATtc I I. SMELT OK COL1At- - 1 i 1O DRA N L -T� t _ IA. VALVE . MIN. 4 C.P. DRAIN ROOK .O BOUNDARY MARKER O MANUAL DRAIN VALVE AND GRAVEL SUMP NO 7OALt= 90% SUBMITTAL NO 6cALM. - LauCFPECCOVECTSER FG RENTON DEMONSTRATION •W I p RIETRG IN..IoipoLItyofN.t.op.LlE S.■ttL. '��'e-1P-ab ^_ t..W, FILE M• Osborn&Hoy, FOREST PROJECT D.R. F.R. AS SHOWN - Planners, Inc. TXw..X • MISCELLANEOUS SITE DEVELOPMENT )nn"t. Ip1111 'tr PMa no,. oo UJoso gtG"DAPPRAPPROVE].R.I514 n a¢ u In U.S.,,.x tr I W/M20-88 I RENTON TREATMENT PLANT A . , G 14 .. DETAILS ,k,l w—I4 la ,"aw.„, .,"e � V C V D - ET... E Ei.. �1.. F V G H A B ' ONS APPROVED APP ID WITH CONDITI �" O NOT APPROVED . • ti //;) [GNAIURE F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVEATE ; - --1)) f REVISION 5/1982 'IEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Form 182 sr� pre��.�,. ]"APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT . APPROVED NATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVEATE ; - 7 i91� REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 :VIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1.40 1-1-741-3RROVED • Ej APPROVED WITH CONDITION S � NOT APPROVED [- • ATU E OF �YRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED - DATE : - �- REPRFSFN'TAT1ir_ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISI EErPPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • r-'1 VI :;'-•-• 1 ': . , i l' /0 0 4'711)( C le'ICS I°r° Llet"-" 1 ,----n (2.1• 03121:, ' - ,-,u11_,,, iii.-...,i.,,, ,... . .. i• , DATE:________) SIGNATURE OF DIR C(I OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 ' . VIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : EjAPPROVED DAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED -PAU! r) '''- , ((q/f :' i it't, / I DATE : GNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 - -- . EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : park5 N,- ElAPPROVED DAPPROVED WITH. CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED DATE : AAD/Cr, r inIVATII 3 nr rs r ' I ENG . DIVIS I SCHEDULED RING DATE : ❑ UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT CmxrerV kkti‘VIvkt 1 .BUIDING & ZONIN - DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LI OTHERS : 2OMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED [N WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 3Y 5:00 P.M, ON OCTIRFIR 5 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : RINVI )IN(o D(L)tw1O J, fl APPROVED 0(1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED d f EWvv`► ' A o PVL PRov/U,, OFWE IPl,4\7 MPPROUAL- 0_ : A Pt2MI)M Jv1 e)E.t r--F- rz c,F Lr4►3Q3Cr irv( 51-buLO le. 1'YlICIk? I1VEr0 t LCiOC' riE No1 x Sri(-3 tAkST- PRoptur( LI1-\1E.% ( burrcet,i+vo N* vahtstOTALG PLMuE, AMC, 5,L ). r►IOrsrc2 rw o )o .jefut.,vv.*F. uv,a ATE. ) 0 7 66 SIGNATURE OF DI TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 COMMENTS: --- — Planet ---Zy 0/0--e• ,V2-7-`-e-e--1. -e?;,ee-ee---C ---ee_e_ e-3.— .--2,40--Z_4„0,___ -1-..--frz-- <-S--Zei25;2----- L--t,,-o-g--- k --/6","...-te-a-,,t-e-e --41-Z-e,-4--6"'e"-cf: ,,� � a'ZeQi( 7:a6.2-71-e. e._ x!;?/L,Ley'.---e. .e..-e . e`-i=i2i.747_7-4—a— .....„, --- pf-er_e__. �7/ �1�!L/LC :it_ - i 1-P 'ez d i.1 o f (tee._ -eg cc=-Cc ell— (74 Z 4.--ei-ec-r --At- _ ._, i • Z , ce,7,-„-e�.-f-•- !'.�� .--�'e•=c l ee-r-'2e�-4._, , e_( /T t 4-doe.-C--e e1 Z D` e4-e c -`e Gf/��o .. d._fre-e'e_- ..._ 99,/,'.- ef'-- 4;'k s..7g/e4.--si--42-e-e7.—ve? ifAi_t_ ecee (j Wewh havereviewe this application with particular attention to t , ich we ae expertise and have identified areas of hose areas hv where a 'onal information is needed to probable impact or are properly assess this proposa . Signature of Direct or Authorized Representative �9 �d Date • VIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; 7 ei ei.te ' . . • • . D APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIOIJS _ • . N07 APPROVED - .1 muss MCC( lit— ArrAe6]c0 D.S.U.S - Coot'-i'u Mrs 4, L to. iqf 7 7 • PLANNING OIV O?I CRY OF RENTON • D 9 g4-' • : .. ; 3NATURE 0 IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATI DATE ; /' �(�. <Cd . . • /�' VE F1EVIS10N 5/1982 . . I:. v •;:+ ,. Form 182 t ':' yam. . ' • Dear Mr. Olson: - • I have given considerable thought to the proposed Silviculture demonstration at northwest area of the Renton Treatment Plant. The following are my the recommendations: • 1. The demonstration area must not be located directly above water supply•lines. The growth of Douglas Fir and healthy cottonwood trees will involve elaborate root systems. The movement of heavy metals. and bacterial contaminants within • . the root system is presently unknown. Also, the • •• repair/replacement of pipeline surrounded by heavy roots will not be easy to maintain. • • - 2. The minimum distance of the treated sludge from the edge of • the pipeline shall be no less than 20 feet provided that: a. The surface runoff does not travel from the demonstration area to the pipeline. b. The groundwater below the demonstration area does not travel towards the trench where the potable water line is located. • c. If there is concern regarding any surface/groundwater contaminates movement towards the pipeline, then that • section of main should be double jacketed for added • •protection. • • • 3. The city has authority to be more stringent, it they have additional concerns. • • Sincerely, • • • g.,e__../Edt, _, Moe R. [3atra, P.E. Regional Engineer NW Drinking Water Operations . MR13:cb • 1. . cc: Seattle-King County Health Department . Wal-ly Swafford • OF R4,4 �i 1oTi E ( ° ) o99TED sEP1 `. S , City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL ON NOVEMBER 22, 1988 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: METROS5-88— SILVICULTURE SP-085�88 DEVELOPMENT OF A SILVICULTURE DEMONSTRATION TO ILLUSTRATE THE EFFECTS OF SLUDGE FERTILIZER ON TREE GROWTH THROUGH THE PLANTING OF DOUGLAS FIR (30,000 SQ.FT.) AND HYBRID POPLARS (75,000 SQ.FT.) TO SHOW THE DIFFERENCES IN GROWTH RATES BETWEEN TREES FERTILIZED WITH SLUDGE AND THOSE GROWN WITHOUT SLUDGE. �/ /1 I METRO PROPERTY LINE // I .\ // OAKESDALE RD.. l / O • , ^ I • :9N. • iv KK.........._ o Ille p6LE AVS.W. v., 1 I NG COUNTY ,s. cv oo 4P cS3 0° O . . ...\ i s XP-.°10u 0 RENTON DEMONSTRATION 2\G",:s2p / / 'FOREST PROJECT RENTON SEWAGE 0- / GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: • PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE RENTON SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AT OAKESDALE AVENUE AND SW 7TH STREET. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT - �_ PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION _ •I , r�EZ • Lik)0, , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT � '`� 00Cl.... ( 4)• COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN Tali"( ( 4-) CONSPICUOUS . PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON frl4 _ 198 . . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, n and for the State of Washington • residing in • day of on • the .SIGNED : f OF RFC _ U a s� Oz ' � oTicE .. o MEMO rn 9 ` : A 091Tep SEP1°° City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a ,..., uotic HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON NOVEMBER 22, 1988 BEGINNING AT 9: 00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: ECF-0METROS5-88,- SILVICULTUREB SP-085+88 DEVELOPMENT OF A SILVICULTURE DEMONSTRATION TO ILLUSTRATE THE EFFECTS OF SLUDGE FERTILIZER ON TREE GROWTH THROUGH THE PLANTING OF DOUGLAS FIR (30, 000 SQ.FT. ) AND HYBRID POPLARS (75, 000 SQ.FT. ) TO SHOW THE DIFFERENCES IN GROWTH RATES BETWEEN TREES FERTILIZED WITH SLUDGE AND THOSE GROWN WITHOUT SLUDGE. 1 ivim -- . // I METRO PROPERTY LINE // , OAKESDALE RD..o� p , , c o a��E .V S.W. -IV k<_ LP i 1 NG COUNTY o o v , .0o , 44 . ono \ js.j_ \ .� 1 , o / RENTON DEMONSTRATION VP l OREST PROJECT RENTON SEWAGE ti r Prq Thy �• ••� • • •IT 1. ^ . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE RENTON SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AT OAKESDALE AVENUE AND SW 7TH STREET. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION J NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN- CIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION FLOASH- NGTOR OF ON, ONITY HALL,NOVEMBER 22, 198, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOW- ING PETITIONS: Audrey 13e nn e r ,beinfirstsworn on oath states METRO-SILVICULTURE duly ECF;SA;SP-085-88A that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Development of a silviculture demons tion to illustrate the effects of sludge fertiliz- er on tree growth through the planting of Douglas fir (30,000 sq.ft.) and hybrid pop- VALLEY DAILY NEWS lars (75,000 sq.ft.) to show the differences in growth rates between trees fertilized with • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition sludge and those grown without sludge. Sew- Dailynewspapers six (6) times a week.That said newspapers age propertytm ts lant adt at the Renton publishedage Treatment Plant at Oakesdale Avenue are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six and SW 7th Street. months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published ALRENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROV in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ECF;SA-064-88 County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Application for site plan approval for a new Honda automobile dealership with con- newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. struction of a two story building of steel and glass, approximately 34,500 sq.ft. in size, The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition which will house offices, showroom, and , Renton Edition x , Auburn Edition , (and not in service bays.The property is located at the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Avenue South. during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community Notice of Public Hearing Development Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID was published on November 11 , 1988 P.5 141 PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 22, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published:NOVEMBER 11, 1988 Valley The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Daily News R5141 Account#51067 sum of $ 32. 00 . • Subscribed and sworn to before me this_5 th day of vim,C 19 83 Not Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON NOVEMBER 22, 1988, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: METRO-SILVICULTURE ECF;SA;SP-085-88A Development of a silviculture demonstration to illustrate the effects of sludge fertilizer on tree growth through the planting of Douglas fir (30, 000 sq. ft. ) and hybrid poplars (75,000 sq. ft. ) to show the differences in growth rates between trees fertilized with sludge and those grown without sludge. The property is located at the Renton Sewage Treatment Plant at Oakesdale Avenue and SW 7th Street. RENTON HONDA SITE PLAN APPROVAL ECF;SA-064-88 Application for site plan approval for a new Honda automobile dealership with construction of a two story building of steel and glass, approximately 34, 500 sq. ft. in size, which will house offices, showroom, and service bays. The property is located at the northwest corner of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 22 , 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: NOVEMBER 11, 1988 %$ 0. CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION November 8, 1988 Gerrie Jackson Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle 821 Second Avenue M/S-66 Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Silviculture Project Renton Treatment Plant, 1200 Monster Road ECF;SA;SP-085-88 Dear Ms. Jackson: A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for November 22, 1988. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 SA-01s3- tLcr,.4.4) —:C ETR0 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 October 31, 1988 PLANNINGDMSION CITY OF RENTON NOV 1 1988 I) Mr. Jerry Lind EMU � Planning Department o City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue Renton, Washington 98058 Renton Treatment Plant - Forest Demonstration Project Dear Mr. Lind: In our telephone conversation a week or so ago, you re- quested our schedule for the above project. As you may be aware, Metro policy requires that all permits be obtained prior to advertising a project. Therefore, you will note in the following schedule that we do not have much time before advertising to obtain the annual grading license after we receive the Hearing Examiner' s decision. If you need any other information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 684-1334 . Ver truly yours, -errie Jackson Right-of-Way Agent GJ:cg Enclosure • .1, ! , . FOREST DEMONSTRATION PROJECT SCHEDULE Permits August, 1988 - December, 1988 Advertise December 15 , 1988 Award Contract February 17 , 1989 Beginning Clear and Grub March 16 , 1989 Begin Cut and Fill March 21 - April 11, 1989 Begin Tree Planting April 24, 1989 City of Renton Technical Advisory Committee MEETING NOTICE October 10, 1988 To: Nancy Laswell Morris Don Monaghan Steve Baima John Morris Gary Norris Rick Stoddard From: Don Erickson, Chairman - Meeting Date: October 12, 1988 Time: 8:30 - 11:00 AM Location: Third Floor Conference Room Agenda is attached below. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA October 12, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 8:30 - 11:00 AM TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS FAITH COVENANT CHURCH CU-051-88 Applicant seeks to obtain conditional use permit to provide a new multi-purpose space expansion church complex for religious activities and administrative offices, including additional parking. The proposed addition is approxi- mately 4,800 sq. ft. Location: 111 South Carr Road SWAN MEADOWS ECF;PP-082-88 Applicant seeks to develop a nine-lot preliminary plat for future development with single family residences. Property includes 2.18 acres which is now vacant and is zoned R-1. Property is located on NE 13th Street and Blaine Avenue NE. BOEING LOG BOOM REPLACEMENT SME-083-88 Applicant seeks to repair existing log boom, which is anchored to the shoreline and to four concrete anchors on the lake bottom. The shore anchor and three lake bottom anchors and cables need to be replaced. Property is located on Lake Washington. Technical Advisory Coma e Agenda October 12, 1988 Page 2 WIELGOS DOCK IMPROVEMENTS ECF;SM;V-084-88 Extend an existing dock twelve (12) feet to permit private boat moorage to serve residence. Location: 2811 Mountain View Avenue North Lake Washington BURDICK V-086-88 Application for variance from Section 4-706,C,4,a to allow a front yard setback of two (2) feet instead of twenty (20) feet and shoreline variance from 7.14.01 of the Shoreline Master Program to have a setback of fourteen (14) ft. from the edge of Lake Washington instead of twenty (20) ft. Property is located along the shore of Lake Washington at 3709 Lake Washington Blvd. North. PACCAR ECF-094-88 Applicant seeks a permit to: a) demolish and remove structures to concrete foundations (including removal of asbestos and hazardous waste materials); b) remove utility lines within foundations, pits and"conduits; c) remove soil samples for testing. Location: 1400 North Fourth Street SOLBERG ECF;CU;R-095-88 Applicant seeks to rezone property from R-2 to B-1, and obtain a conditional use permit to develop a portion of the property with a ware- house to store products in conjunction with retail sales occurring on the property. Location: 3155 NE Sunset Blvd. CONTINUING PROJECTS UNION SQUARE (AMENDED) SP-041-88 Request for permit to excavate 81,000 cu. yds. of fill (to place suitable material on site, at a grade acceptable for future development of the site). There are no specific plans for the development of the site under consideration at this time. Property located on the north side of NE 4th Street west of Duvall Avenue NE. Quantities revised to 8,100 cu. yds. of duff to be hauled off, 30,000 cu. yds. of on-site material relocated, and 21,000 cu. yds. of suitable imported material for a total of approximately 59,000 cu. yds. instead of the previous quantity of 89,000 cu. yds. Technical Advisory Come !e Agenda October 12, 1988 Page 3 DISCUSSION SILVICULTURE SA; SP-085-88 Development of a silviculture demonstration to illustrate the effects of sludge fertilizer on tree growth through the planting of Douglas fir (30,000 sq. ft.) and hybrid poplars (75,000 sq. ft.) to show the differences in growth rates between trees fertilized with sludge and those grown without sludge. Sludge medium is GROCO (3 parts sawdust; 1 part sludge). Location: Renton Sewage Treatment Plant at Oakesdale Avenue and SW 7th Street. •P w CITY OF RENTON a. 1 '}:. POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor September 26, 1988 Gerrie Jackson Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle 821 Second Avenue M/S-66 Seattle, Washington 98104 Re: Silviculture Project, Renton Treatment Plant, 1200 Monster Road (SA 085-88) Dear Ms. Jackson: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review; this evaluation is scheduled for completion on October 5th. When the materials have been returned to the Planning Division, staff analysis will be undertaken and the project will be scheduled for public hearing before our City Hearing Examiner. You will be notified in writing of the hearing date. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact our office at 235-2550. Sincer ly, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: U-,-j %-h_e_ DATE1 CIRCULATED: 9/26/88 COMMENTS DUE: 10/5/88 EFC 085 — 88 APPLICATION NO (S) : SA 085-88 PROPONENT: METRO PROJECT TITLE: SILVICULTURE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: METRO proposes to develop a demonstration project at the Renton Treatment plant to illustrate the effects of slude fertilizer on tree growth. Douglas fir RI hybrid poplars would be planted in an area of approx. 105,000 square feet in 15,900 cubic yards of Groco .(a sawdust/sludge mix) . See attached memo for more information. LOCATION: Renton Treatment Plant SITE1 AREA 83.5 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 105,000 sq ft aprox IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION ' ' IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. 1 Earth ° ° e 2 . ' Air ° e 3 . Water ° ° °_ 4 . Plants . ° ° 5 . Animals ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° e 9 . Housing ° ° e 10. Aesthetics ° ° e 11. . Light & Glare ° ° e 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . ' Transportation ° ° 15. Public Services ° ✓ ° ° 16 . . Utilities ° ,/ ° ° I COMMENTS : se` P.S.u. S . Co►limeivrc • PLANNING DIVISION COY OF IiENTON 1 -, 1 U I OCT 2 0 1988 . L , 1 . ,s q)-- We have revie ed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have - pertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additi. in - r. .�9on is needed to properly assess this proposal. li II ' ,17/.20 Signature o; Director or Authorized Representative / Date _ RENTOF_ _UILDING & ZONING DEPAR I'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 085 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-085-88 PROPONENT : METRO PROJECT TITLE: SILVICULTURE BRIEIF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: METRO PROPOSES TO DEVELOP A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT ATITHE RENTON TREATMENT PLANT TO ILLUSTRATE THE EFFECTS OF SLUDE FERTILIZER ON TREE GROWTH. DOUGLAS FIR & HYBRID POPLARS WOULD BE PLANTED IN AN AREA OF APPROX. 105 , 000 S .F. IN 15, 900 CUBIC YARDS OF GROCO (A SAWDUST/SLUDGE MIX. ) SEE ATTACHED LOCATION : MEMO FOR MORE INFO. 1 RENTON TREATMENT PLANT TO: 1 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED •ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1 15<I UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ® POLICE DEPARTMENT ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ® OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD. BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON OCTORRR 5 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : . ® APPROVED N1APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED ust M 1 it- A7rAed D,S.i,S - Co'i k i rT Aim.. zo, of 7 i PAANNMNG DIVISION CITE OF RENTON Dc9 • G - 1 �(I) DATE: /14?/&O /,Y SIGNATURE 0 DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE , 11'42At REVISION 5/1982 • ST/ it/ 4 !! ..1 i � -'.1 A. N. SHINPOCH wN Secretary /899 Ck° STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND' HEALTH SERVICES 217 Pine Street, Suite 220, 817-12 • Seattle, Washington 98 10 1-154 9 April 20, 1987 , . . RECEFICED APR 21 1987 ENC!NEE?IPIG DEFT. City of Renton CITY OF RENON Water Department 3555 NE 2nd St Renton, Washington 98056 Attention: Ron Olson Subject: Renton Treatment Plant Silviculture Demonstration Area Dear Mr. Olson: I have given considerable thought to the proposed Silviculture demonstration at the northwest area of the Renton Treatment Plant. The following are my recommendations: 1. The demonstration area must not be located directly above water supply lines. The growth of Douglas Fir and healthy cottonwood trees will involve elaborate root systems. The movement of heavy metals and bacterial contaminants within the root system is presently unknown. Also, the repair/replacement of pipeline surrounded by heavy roots will not be easy to maintain. 2. The minimum distance of the treated sludge from the edge of the pipeline shall be no less than 20 feet provided that: a. The surface runoff does not travel from the demonstration area to the pipeline. b. The groundwater below the demonstration area does not travel towards the trench where the potable water line is located. c. If there is concern regarding any surface/groundwater contaminates movement towards the pipeline, then that section of main should be double jacketed for added protection. 3 City of Renton Re: Silviculture Demonstration Area April 20, 1987 Page 2 3. The city has authority to be more stringent, if they have additional concerns. Sincerely, • aC1-&-' Moe R. Batra, P.E. Regional Engineer NW Drinking Water Operations MRB:cb cc: Seattle-King County Health Department Wally Swafford • 1 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1-I pe_V r 1 DATE : CIRCULATED: 9/26/88 COMMENTS DUE: 10/5/88 EFC - 085 — 88 APPLICATION NO (S) : SA 085-88 PROPONENT: METRO PROJECT TITLE: SILVICULTURE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: METRO proposes to develop a demonstration project at the Renton Treatment plant to illustrate the effects of slude fertilizer on tree growth. Douglas fir & hybrid plars would be planted in an area of approx. 105,000 square feet in 15,900 cubic yards of Groco .(a sawdust/sludge mix) . See attached memo for more information. LOCATION: Renton Treatment Plant SITE: AREA 83.5 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 105,000 sq ft aprox IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION • IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2 . Air ° 0 3 . Water ° , 0 4 . Plants • ° , 0 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7 . ! Environmental Ilealth 8 . Land & Shoreline Use o e 9 . Housing 10. Aesthetics ° e 0 11. Light & Glare ° ° 12 . Recreation 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation 14 . Transportation ° ° ° 15 . Public Services ° ,/ 16 . Utilities COMMENTS : • • • • • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of 'probable impact or are - where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. oZ 7 /9f( Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date RENTON .'JILDINO & ZONING DEPARl __.ANT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 085 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-085-88 PROPONENT : METRO PROJECT TITLE : SILVICULTURE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: METRO PROPOSES TO DEVELOP A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT AT THE RENTON TREATMENT PLANT IQ ILLUSTRATE THE EFFECTS OF SLUDE FERTILIZER ON TREE GROWTH.. DOUGLAS FIR & HYBRID POPLARS WOULD BE PLANTED IN AN AREA OF APPROX. 105000 S.F. IN 15, 900 CUBIC YARDS OF GROCO (A SAWDUST/SLUDGE MIX. ) SEE ATTACHED LOCATION MEMO FOR MORE INFO. RENTON TREATMENT PLANT TO : , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : j ENGINEERING DIVISION 111 TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 111 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION pl FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU riPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT LI .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT 0 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5�: 00 P .M. ON OCTORFR REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 9irc preVe cw 'APPROVED I ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED DATE : 7, /911 SIGNiATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 ^ _ 1 CI 1 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: _. `�. �t�1l DATE CIRCULATED: 9/26/88 COMMENTS DUE: 10/5/88 EFC — 085 — 88 'APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 085-88 PROPONENT: METRO PROJECT TITLE: SILVICULTURE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: METRO proposes to develop a demonstration project at the Renton Treatment plant to illustrate the effects of slude fertilizer on tree growth. Douglas fir & hybrid poplars would be planted in an area of approx. 105,000 square feet in 15,900 cubic yard of Groco .(a sawdust/sludge mix) . See attached memo for more information. LOCATION: Renton Treatment Plant SITE AREA 83.5 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 105,000 sq ft aprox IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION • ' IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY ' 1. Earth ° ° ° 2 . Air ° ° 3 . Water ° ° • 4 . Plants - ° ee 5. Animals ° ° • , 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o 7 . Environmental Health ° ° e 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° e 9 . Housing ° - ,_,---; e _ 10. Aesthetics ° e 11. Light & Glare ° ° • , 12 . Recreation ° ° • 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° • 16. Utilities ° e ° COMMENTS: C"'i'/ is a �':,,�I�iTW,1 r7111 r,-,7:3 ` L SD % f19E • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where addi ' al informatio s needed to properly assess this proposal. 91---2->--; Signa e of Director or Authorized Representative Date RENTON ..;,ILDING & ZONING DEPART - NT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 085 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-085-88 PROPONENT : METRO PROJECT TITLE : SILVICULTURE BRIEIF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: METRO PROPOSES TO DEVELOP A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT AT 'THE RENTON TREATMENT PLANT TO ILLUSTRATE THE EFFECTS OF SLUDE FERTILIZER ON TREE GROWTH. DOUGLAS FIR & HYBRID POPLARS WOULD BE PLANTED IN AN AREA OF APPROX. 105, 000 S.F. IN 15, 900 CUBIC YARDS OF GROCO (A SAWDUST/SLUDGE MIX. ) SEE ATTACHED LOCATION : MEMO FOR MORE INFO. RENTON TREATMENT PLANT TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : I EENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : I E1UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Es" BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT ■ POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ® OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON OCTORF.R 5 REVIIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : • APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED L L L' SEP271-3C8 /or li v— DATE : - PP SIGNA E OF' DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 ,�_� ,o) RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: f)ayL5 DATE; CIRCULATED: 9/26/88 COMMENTS DUE: 10/5/88 • EFC - 085 — 88 • APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 085-88 • PROPONENT: METRO PROJECT TITLE: SILVICULTURE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: METRO proposes to develop a demonstration project at the Renton Treatment plant to illustrate the effects of slude fertilizer on tree growth. Douglas fir & hybrid poplars would be planted in an area of approx. 105,000 square feet in 15,900 cubic yards of Groco (a sawdust/sludge mix) . See attached memo for more information. LOCATION: Renton Treatment Plant • SITE, AREA 83.5 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 105,000 sq ft aprox IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 2 . Air 3 . Water 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° 0 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . • Environmental Health 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° 0 10 . Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° ° • 15 . Public Services 16 . Utilities ° ° 0 • COMMENTS : /0 i 1 ,- • • • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additio a in - rmation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature f Director or Authorized Representative Date RENTON JILDING & ZONING DEPAR"_ __...ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 085 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-085-88 PROPONENT : METRO PROJECT TITLE : SILVICULTURE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : METRO PROPOSES TO DEVELOP A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT AT THE RENTON TREATMENT PLANT IQ ILLUSTRATE THE EFFECTS OF SLUDE FERTILIZER ON TREE GROWTH. DOUGLAS FIR & HYBRID POPLARS WOULD BE PLANTED IN AN AREA OF APPROX. 105, 000 S.F. IN 15, 900 CUBIC YARDS OF GROCO (A SAWDUST/SLUDGE MIX. ) SEE ATTACHED LOCATION : MEMO FOR MORE INFO. RENTON TREATMENT PLANT TO : [1PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION 1-7 TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : r] LJTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU INPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT - n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT 'f' , -_ - n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT :;11:L j:• ;;;/ O\NINNIG MOTHERS : 1 COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P ,M, ON O(',TORF.R REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Ia' "s II APPROVED [1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS [1NOT APPROVED DATE : /?/.ST/S7P SIGNATU OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 O-) • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �r�Par►009 • • . DATE . CIRCULATED: 9/26/88 COMMENTS DUE: 10/5/88 • EFC - 085 — 88 APPLICATION NO (S) : SA 085-88 PROPONENT: METRO PROJECT TITLE: SILVICULTURE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: METRO proposes to develop a demonstration project at the Renton Treatment plant to illustrate the effects of slude fertilizer on tree growth. Douglas fir & hybrid poplars would be planted in an area of approx. 105,000 square feet in 15,900 cubic yards of Groco .(a sawdust/sludge mix) . See attached memo for more information. LOCATION: Renton Treatment Plant • SITE AREA 83.5 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 105,000 sq ft aprox IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION • ' IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2 . Air -- 3 . Water ° ° 0 4 . ' Plants ° 0 5 . Animals ° ° 0 6. ! Energy & Natural Resources 7 . 1Environmental Health 8 . ; Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 0 9 . ' Housing 10 . ' Aesthetics ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° 0 12 . . Recreation ° ),• ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° 15 . ' Public Services ° ° 16 . Utilities ° ° 0 00MMENTS : 406 050.C_$) 04b, a°3 e Ni 0-} .9 • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.�+ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date RENTO_= 3UILDING & ZONING DEPAI, . .AIENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 085 - 88 APPLIICATION NO(S) : SA-085-88 i PROPONENT : METRO PROJECT TITLE : SILVICULTURE BRIE1F DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: METRO PROPOSES TO DEVELOP A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT AT THE RENTON TREATMENT PLANT TO ILLUSTRATE THE EFFECTS OF SLUDE FERTILIZER ON TREE GROWTH. DOUGLAS FIR & HYBRID POPLARS WOULD BE PLANTED IN AN AREA OF APPROX. 105, 000 S.F. IN 15, 900 CUBIC YARDS OF GROCO (A SAWDUST/SLUDGE MIX. ) SEE ATTACHED LOCATION : MEMO FOR MORE INFO. RENTON TREATMENT PLANT TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ELENGINEERING DIVISION n I ( TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : r1UTILITIES ENG .. DIVISION pi FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT II POLICE DEPARTMENT • POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MOTHERS : 1 COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON OCTORF.R S . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ZnopneerlrI � JIAPPROVED I ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED DATE : I/ /V. r`' � SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ' '\a C , , . DATE : CIRCULATED: 9/26/88 COMMENTS DUE: 10/5/88 EFC _ 085 — 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 085-88 PROPONENT: METRO PROJECT TITLE: SILVICULTURE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: METRO proposes to develop a demonstration project at the Renton Treatment plant to illustrate the effects of slude fertilizer on tree growth. Douglas fir & hybrid poplars would be planted in an area of approx. 105,000 square feet in 15,900 cubic yards of Groco .(a sawdust/sludge mix) . See attached memo for more information. LOCATION: Renton Treatment Plant SITE AREA 83.5 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 105,000 sq ft aprox IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° 0 4 . Plants ° ° 0 5. Animals ° ° 6. , Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° 7 . ; Environmental Health ° ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° 0 10 . Aesthetics ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° ° 0 15 . Public Services ° ° ° 16 . ' Utilities ° 0 ° COMMENTS : �C,a vZ✓ t,C Sri C C pv,.01444_5. (.,i ., `._ �`� •',_,;.--•1 G`-- i ' P 1- 1; I; I B<n_ ON,,,. _ ,- t. • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have exp rtise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where ddition 1 information is needed to properly assess this proposal. „4, 1 ow a 1solgv Signature oyb ' r ctor or Authorized Representative Dat i RENTON _UILDING & ZONING DEPAR°_ ___ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF 085 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-085-88 PROPONENT ; METRO PROJECT TITLE : SILVICULTURE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: METRO PROPOSES TO DEVELOP A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT AT THE RENTON TREATMENT PLANT TO ILLUSTRATE THE EFFECTS OF SLUDE FERTILIZER ON TREE GROWTH. DOUGLAS FIR & HYBRID POPLARS WOULD BE PLANTED IN AN AREA OF APPROX. 105, 000 S .F. IN 15, 900 CUBIC YARDS OF GROCO (A SAWDUST/SLUDGE MIX. ) SEE ATTACHED LOCATION : MEMO FOR MORE INFO. RENTON TREATMENT PLANT TO: n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : n ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : [1UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION III FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT [1BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ® POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ■ OTHERS : 1 COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : OO P ,M, ON OCTORF.R 5 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 'T- -ffin [ APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS F-1 NOT APPROVED /10 0 4' 12((,c_(%i p1"-Cr-r_ lem SL� ,llyj� U f 4 u �.. i 1, ) -zuti-Cl , i DATE ; 30 SIGNATURE OF DIR C R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CI REVISION 5/1982 ,.,_—_ ,o RENTON " UILDING & ZONING DEPAR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF 085 - 88 APPLIICATION NO(S) : SA-085-88 PROPONENT : METRO PROJECT TITLE : SILVICULTURE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: METRO PROPOSES TO DEVELOP A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT AT THE RENTON TREATMENT PLANT IQ ILLUSTRATE THE EFFECTS OF SLUDE FERTILIZER ON TREE GROWTH. DOUGLAS FIR & HYBRID POPLARS WOULD BE PLANTED IN AN AREA OF APPROX. 105; 000 S.F. IN 15, 900 CUBIC YARDS OF GROCO (A SAWDUST/SLUDGE MIX. ) SEE ATTACHED LOCATION : MEMO FOR MORE INFO. RENTON TREATMENT PLANT TO: , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : Ell ENGINEERING DIVISION 111 TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ri FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT FLPOLICE DEPARTMENT Ei POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT II OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED 1 IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON OCTORFR S REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 40 g APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED Jtom' Lr1j L E. SI ATU E OF RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 nrm 1R9 1 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Po�� • DATE :CIRCULATED: 9/26/88 COMMENTS DUE: 10/5/88 EFC - 085 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 085-88 PROPONENT: METRO PROJECT TITLE: SILVICULTURE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: METRO proposes to develop a demonstration project at the Renton Treatment plant to illustrate the effects of slude fertilizer on tree growth. Douglas fir hybrid poplars would be planted in an area of approx. 105,000 square feet in 15,900 cubic yards of Groco .(a sawdust/sludge mix) . See attached memo for more information. LOCATION: Renton Treatment Plant SITE AREA 83.5 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 105,000 sq ft aprox IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° 2 . Air ° , 3 . Water 4 . Plants • ° ° 5 . Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 9 . Housing ° ° 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation 15 . Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS : , �.... .,, . r•y.a�^'eel SEP S M �i J� II • We ,have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are whe dditiona ' forma ' n is needed to properly assess this proposal. S ` ature of Director or Authorized Representative Date . N lib44F171Yal... RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET -,.p� i%). REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: / 498 DATE CIRCULATED: 9/26/88 COMMENTS DUE: 10/557:1 `p . , EFC - 085 - 88 APPLICATION NO (S) : SA 085-88 - rfry!gyp -:,._'��•-��,.,,4 PROPONENT: METRO ,)I SEP 2 6 1988 r; PROJECT TITLE: SILVICULTURE 15 l6 �� II �� /11' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: METRO proposes to develop a demonstration project at the Renton Treatment plant to illustrate the effects of slude fertilizer on tree growth. Douglas fir & hybrid poplars would be planted in an area of approx. 105,000 square feet in 15,900 cubic yards of Groco .(a sawdust/sludge mix) . See attached memo for more information. LOCATION: Renton Treatment Plant SITE AREA 83.5 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 105,000 sq ft aprox IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY • 1. Earth e , 2 . Air o 0 3 . Water e , 4 . Plants - e , 5. Animals o , 6. Energy & Natural Resources a o 7 . Environmental Health o e e 8 . Land & Shoreline Use o e 9 . Housing e o 10. Aesthetics o , 11. Light & Glare e e 12 . Recreation o , 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation . 14 . Transportation 0 e . 15 . Public Services e 16. Utilities - e e e COMMENTS: Lagi .. PianhM1 . ( pA52/2-0,,,,e_ ›,a,7,,---z— _.,2,7,4-,...„-,„,_ .......ze-- ,f---z-,___. a,,,,f,,„, f2_,. .,....__ , _____,44,..„4.4.- _-_-_, .--ft.._- e9-eee-z-- i9.'"'''--e---'''''' __,,,47 ,,/ "12-7'.-f--e-- --- -e..-e•c-e --e -----d_e_____ --- /4110"--T-0--i---4-- __ [�t G--�c: oz--- ' &,:--- ----- Come.- ,-.r �L#�'---� )1Q-2-72-e -15`7:-. 4,---,004.‹..-e ,-; ,.....e, - ,.J,ee We have reviewe this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where a ' onal. information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 9. 'Signature of Direct or Authorized Representative Date - ` O /511/1- .• 7Ze_ • .d<e_ a-e-ere_ cca__ • 76- • .:• • . . . • I • 1'1 I I , I I • - . • .. • . • • , y. RENTOI UILDING & ZONING DEBAR ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET eiTYECF - 085 - 88 c�,cr o�GCtc ,;Ei�r f?ei !OiV APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-085--88 �� SEA s 1988 A PROPONENT : METRO p 1211 E PROJECT TITLE : SILVICULTURE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: METRO PROPOSES TO DEVELOP A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT AT THE RENTON TREATMENT PLANT IQ ILLUSTRATE THE EFFECTS OF SLUDE FERTILIZER ON TREE GROWTH. DOUGLAS FIR & HYBRID POPLARS WOULD BE PLANTED IN AN AREA OF APPROX. 105, 000 S .F. IN 15, 900 CUBIC YARDS OF GROCO (A SAWDUST/SLUDGE MIX. ) SEE ATTACHED LOCATION : MEMO FOR MORE INFO. RENTON TREATMENT PLANT TO: n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : n ENGINEERING DIVISION in TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT F-1 POLICE DEPARTMENT aPOLiCr - g�- P1 ARl►MENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON OCTORF.R REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED JAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 } RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Curilexit Pl ymM DATE CIRCULATED: 9/26/88 COMMENTS DUE: 10/5/88 EFC - 085 — 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 085-88 PROPONENT: METRO PROJECT TITLE: SILVICULTURE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: METRO proposes to develop a demonstration project at the Renton Treatment plant to illustrate the effects of slude fertilizer on tree growth. Douglas fir & ybrid poplars would be planted in an area of approx. 105,000 square feet in 15,900 cubic yards of Groco .(a sawdust/sludge mix) . See attached memo for more information. LOCATION: Renton Treatment Plant SITE AREA 83.5 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 105,000 sq ft aprox IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION • IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2 . Air 3 . Water ° ° 0 4 . Plants . ° , 0 5 . Animals 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 9 . Housing ° ° 10 . Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12 . Recreation 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° ° 15 . Public Services 16 . Utilities COMMENTS : NiEcEssaiq / S memo l-As Cl-10 'TO 63 LSD c47- V\X*Y uiElcAnZL 6 plus ) 0 (EK. 24� Fl © • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. itieiVU Signature of D ctor or Authorized Representative Date REN1 J BUILDING & ZONING DEP TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF = 085 - 88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-085-88 PROPONENT : METRO PROJECT TITLE : SILVICULTURE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: METRO PROPOSES TO DEVELOP A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT AT THE RENTON TREATMENT PLANT IQ ILLUSTRATE THE EFFECTS OF SLUDE FERTILIZER ON TREE GROWTH. DOUGLAS FIR & HYBRID POPLARS WOULD BE PLANTED IN AN AREA OF APPROX. 105, 000 S .F. IN 15, 900 CUBIC YARDS OF GROCO (A SAWDUST/SLUDGE MIX. ) SEE ATTACHED LOCATION : MEMO FOR MORE INFO. RENTON TREATMENT PLANT TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION LTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-1 UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Cuxrexi\ OasAhv ‘R BUILDING & ZONIN- DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P ,M, ON OCTORF.R 5 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : PLM \DIn)09 OiUtSk&r F-1 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I INOT APPROVED REWVvNirv‘EA10 NDAR0VALe SIDE pt..te1/4.) FPP 0 At pQyr 1 15(4 Fret. c)F. c.,14100,3c1PiUt, 5800L0 YY) iIQE0 & ThE Norkix 4 'psW 0 LAST Prtcspiler( UWE.% C buPF 'tS1'J(P C7Rht✓5DMMG Ptueiourfc, rase0,0 S‘LA), InnO Whit R )A13 )6 . U"nobt DATE: ) 0 - 7_ 6 SIGNATURE OF DIR TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 �...:... 101 September, 1988 Memorandum To: Staff Reviewers From: Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator Subject: METRO Forest Demonstration Project (ECF; SP 085-88) . In reviewing the enclosed materials, you should be aware of the fact that the application includes: 1) An Environmental Checklist (including an attached supplemental document) which was prepared and approved by METRO, as the lead agency in 1986; 2) An Addendum to the Checklist which was prepared and approved by METRO in August, 1988. This Addendum describes changes to the nature of the proposed project; these changes do affect the scope of the project, and, perhaps, the impacts. Thus, these changes need to be evaluated as part of a review of the project. Since the project now will use a product called "GROCO" as a growing medium, rather than the sludge which was proposed in the 1986 Checklist, the applicant has been asked to provide the City with a listing of the contents of that medium. This information will be available for the TAC review of this project. C c c'c - ? p/\K-r-S- s"w-DUST ; % �ONCz-T In your review, we also ask that you look at the significance of the project with respect to the adjacent P-1 Channel, based upon the potential impacts to the existing habitats in the Forebay and adjacent areas. If you have any questions or would like additional information from the applicant to be available for your review and/or for review by TAC, please telephone me or Lenora Blauman at Extension 2550. Thank you. LETT_ OF TRANSMITTAL /4mETRD , Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle r DATE FILE/CONTRACT NO. Ave', August 29, 1988 , Seattle,Washington 98104 TO ATTENTION OF Lenora Blauman REGARDING TO: Renton Treatment Plant City of Renton - Planning Dept. Forest Demonstration Project 200.Mi l l Avenue South Renton, AA. 98055 - _;\ WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ti AUG 3 1 1988 ATTACHED El UNDER SEPARATE COVER \, COPIES DATE DRWG.NO. • DESCRIPTION 1 Specifications for Forest Demonstration Project • • THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: Ei FOR APPROVAL • FOR YOUR USE AND INFORMATION n AS REQUESTED 0 FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT. El OTHER: . REMARKS Please let me know if you need anything else. My phone number is 684-1334. SIGNATURE 1� TITLE DIVISION Right-of-Way 0295(Rev.12/78 ' .rY o (C) ,ITY OF RENTC T FILE NO(S): 5W--,065- 88 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Sp-085" MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is o comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of applications) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle D *(FROM TO ) ADDRESS 821 2nd Avenue, M/S-66 0 SPECIAL PERMIT* 0 CITY ZIP TE ORARY PERMIT* • Seattle, WA 98104 ED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* SITE PLAN APPROVAL 325.00 TELEPHONE (206) 684-1334 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 425.00 t No. of Cubic Yards:33,000 CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE* From Section: * Justification Required NAME I Gerrie Jackson-Metro ? ADDRESS ' SUBDIVISIONS: 821 2nd Avenue, M/S-66 D SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP D TENTATIVE PLAT Seattle, WA 98104 D PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE D FINAL PLAT (206) 684-1334 D WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER N0. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle , ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 821 2nd Avenue Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP D FINAL Seattle, WA 98104 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE (206) 684-1334 D Residential D Industrial • D Commercial D Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS 1200 Monster Road 0 TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING 0 PRELIMINARY Sewer Treatment Plant P-1 FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Forest Demilonstration Area • NUMBER OF SPACES: Only 5 acres affected. D ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SQ. FT. ACRES AREA: � _ 83.5 Total TOTAL FEES 750.00 �eve,;ti,.., ;'.. `,fS`T/AFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE STAMP 'Ia'". ,U ./ti--.a R Z N`� e APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: - J O APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: s.(? o.4(., F,.T ,fy .. Accepted " ,!,np. fir: Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: ViP VI;e APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: lD Accepted DIncomplete Notification Sent On By: • (Initials) ROUTED TO: D Building Q Design Eng. EJ Fire D Parks • D Police D Policy Dev. D Traffic Eng. D Utilities Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). See Attached. • • • • AFFIDAVIT Gerri e Jackson , being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner,Downer of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief: ' SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS O M io c 'PI DAY OF �� : NV a ~•teo 14,IN onend GoAr NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF otrA' m WASHINGTON, RESIDING [ AT +`yd;%%7*a Nam`.• +�� • (MALI lateeirtotto me of Notary Public) ( i nature of Owner) • *4?N4W4aa Pc_, ev#24;get0/9/ 821 2nd Avenue dress) (Address) Seattle, WA 98104 (City) (State) (Zip) • 684-1334 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." - Pnrm #17d ORDINANCE NO. 3961 Exhibit "A" RENTON TREATMENT PLANT TOTAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Parts of Government Lots 2, 5 and 6, the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 and the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 E, W. M., King County, Washington, as more particularly described hereinbelow: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 E, W. M., as established by King County Aerial Survey Coordinates (Existing Monument); thence South 87026'48" East along the north line of Section 24, a distance of 2692.56 feet, more or less, to the North 1/4 corner of said Section, established by a survey and the ties thereto, together with the King County Aerial Survey Coordinates, filed with the King County Engineer; thence South 0°55'30" West along the north- south center line of said Section 24, the bearing of which is based on the angle in the southwest quadrant at the North 1/4 corner as determined from King County Aerial Survey Subdivision of said Section 24, a distance of 609.118 feet of the true point of beginning of this description; thence South 89°04'30" East along a line perpendicular to said north-south center line of Section 24, a distance of 470.00 feet; thence South 0055'33" West along a line which is 470.00 feet easterly of and parallel with said north-south center line of Section 24, a distance of 1402•.37 feet, more or less, to the intersection thereof with the northerly line of the right-of-way of the Northern Pacific Railway Company; thence southwesterly, westerly and northwesterly, along said northerly line of right-of-way, to the intersection thereof with the northeasterly line of 72nd Avenue South; thence northwesterly, northeasterly and northerly along the easterly line of said 72nd Avenue South to the intersection thereof with a line bearing North 89004'30" West from said true point of beginning; thence South 89004'30" East along said last mentioned line, 1046.33 feet, more or less, to said true point of beginning of this description. EXCEPT that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the north quarter corner of said Section 24, being identified by Washington State Lambert Grid Coordinates (North Zone) N.176,063.50 and E.1,652,34 5.10; thence South 00055'30" West, along the North-South centerline of said Section 24, 159.12 feet to a point on the Southerly line of a tract of land recorded under auditor's file number 7301180480; thence South 89004'30" East along said Southerly line 439.00 feet; Thence South 00055'30" West 300.00 feet to a point on the Northerly margin of a parcel of land owned by the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (METRO), which is the true point of beginning, also being a point on a curve, the center of said curve being South 00055'30" West 9.15 feet; thence Southeasterly along said curve 12.67 feet; Thence South 11034'46" East 311.39 feet; thence North 78°2 14" East 10.00 feet; O I,Telc,�&South 1 1034'46" East 783.48 feet, to apoint "A"; thence North 18039'08" AUG29' loop J I West 94.52 feet; thence North 11°34'46" \Vest 749.46 feet to a point of curve, the center of said curve being South 78°25'14" West 307.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along said curve 329.53 feet; thence North 73004'46" West 89.03 feet to a point on the Northerly margin of land owned by the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle; thence South 89004'30" East 238.60 feet along said North margin to the point at beginning. ALSO, An irregular shaped parcel of land all situate in the Northwest Quarter and the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, 'described more particularly as follows: Beginning at a point on the North margin of right-of-way of the Burlington Northern Inc., "former Northern Pacific Railway Company" 470.0 feet Easterly as measured at right angles to the North-South Quarter line of said Section 24; thence North 0055'30" East 1402.37 feet; thence North 89004'30" West 1516.33 feet, more or less, to the Easterly margin of County Road No. 24-23-4-1 "Monster or Steel Hill Road"; thence Northerly along said Easterly margin to a point hereinafter described; "commencing at a point on the East line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, which point is 1804.20 feet North of the center of said Section 24; thence South 89034'43" West 1050 feet, more or less, to the Easterly margin of County Road No. 8, 72nd Avenue South "Monster or Steel Hill Road"; thence Northerly along said Easterly margin 404.0 feet to said point"; thence continuing above description; thence North 89034'43" East 200.0 feet; thence Northerly at right angles to a point on the South margin of a hereinafter described tract of line. "A tract of land of varying width all lying in the North half of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, the centerline being described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 24, thence South 87026'48" East 1826.61 feet on and along the North line of Section 24; thence North 22026'02" West 13.12 feet to a beginning of a curve and the true point of beginning of this description; thence continuing with a tract of land 300 feet in width, being 150 feet on each side of"the following described centerline; thence Southeasterly along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 572.96 feet a distance of 666.41 feet; thence South 89004'30" East 783.81 feet; thence Southeasterly along a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 159.15 feet a distance of 215.27 feet; thence South 11034'46" East 311.39 feet to a point which is the end of 300-foot width of said tract; thence continuing with a tract of land 280 feet in width, being 140 feet on each side of the following described centerline; thence South 11034'46" East 1100.00 feet to a point which is the end of 280-foot width of said tract; thence continuing with a tract of land 140 feet in width; being 70 feet on-each side of the following described centerline; thence South 11034'46" East.29.00 feet; thence South 12048'36" East to a point on the North tnargin of Burlington Northern, Inc. right-of-way "Former Northern Pacific Railway Company" and the end of this description." Thence continuing wih above description; thence Easterly along South margin of said tract of land to a point North 89004'30" West 344.81 feet ofil point South 00055'30" West 459.118 feet of the North Quarter of Section 24; thenGp;$outh 39004'30" East 783.81 feet; thence Southeasterly along a tangent curve to the right having a radius 2 I � J 1 of 9.15 feet a distance of 12.38 feet; thence South 11034'46" East 311.39 feet; thence North78025'14" East 10.00 feet; thence South 11034'46" East 1100.00 feet; thence North 78025'14" East 70.00 feet; thence South 11034'46" East 29.75 feet; thence south 12048'36" East to a point on the North margin of Burlington Northern, Inc. right-of-way "Former Northern Pacific Railway Company"; thence Southwesterly along,said North margin to the true point of beginning and the end of this description. EXCEPT that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the north quarter corner of said Section 24, being identified by Washington State Lambert Grid Coordinates (North Zone) N.176,063.50 and E.1,652,845.10; thence South 00°55'30"West, along the North-South centerline of said Section 24, 159.12 feet to a point on the Southerly line of a tract of land recorded under auditor's file number 7301180480; thence South 89004'30" East along said Southerly line 439.00 feet; Thence South 00055'30" \Vest 300.00 feet to a point on the Northerly margin of a parcel of land owned by the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (METRO), which is the true point of beginning, also being a point on a curve, the center of said curve being South 00055'30" West 9.15 feet; thence Southeasterly along said curve 12.67 feet; Thence South 11°34'46" East 311.39 feet; thence North 78°25'14" East 10.00 feet; thence South 11°34'46" East 783.48 feet, to a point "A"; thence North 18°39'08" West 94.52 feet; thence North 11°34'46" West 749.46 feet to a point of curve, the center of said curve being South 78°25'14" West 307.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along said curve 329.53 feet; thence North 73°04'46" West 89.03 feet to a point on the Northerly margin of land owned by the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle; • thence South 89°04'30" East 238.60 feet along said North margin to the point at beginning. ALSO, A portion of a tract of land situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington as described in an instrument recorded under Auditor's File No. 7203290497, more particularly described as follows: A tract of land lying in the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and in Government Lot 2 of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., said tract being 300 feet in width, lying 150 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 24, thence South 87026'48" East 1826.61 feet along the north line of Section 24; Thence North 22026'02" West 69.89 feet to the true point of beginning of the centerline being herein described: Thence South 22026'02" East 56.77 feet; thence southeasterly along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 572.96 feet a distance of 666.41 feet; thence South 89004'30" East 344.81 feet to a point on ,the North-South centerline of said Section 24, which point is South 00055'30" West 309.12 feet from the North Quarter • `. . corner of said Section 24; thence South 89004'30" East 439.00 feet and the end of this description. EXCEPT the following described parcel of land: Commencing at a point on the east line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., which point is 1804.20 feet north of the center of said Section 24; thence South 89034'43" West 1050 feet more or less to the easterly margin of County Road No. 24-23-4-1 (Monster or Steel Hill Road); thence northerly along said easterly margin 404.0 feet • to the true point of beginning; thence North 89034'43" East 200.00 feet; thence North 00025'17"West 300.0 feet; thence South 89034'43" West to the easterly margin of said County Road No. 24-23-4-1; thence southerly along said easterly margin to the true point of beginning and end of this description; EXCEPT any portion of the above described tract of land lying northerly of and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 24; thence South 00055'30" West, along the North-South centerline of said Section 24, 159.12 feet to a point on the southerly line of a tract of land recorded under Auditor's File No. 7301180480; thence South 89°04'30" East along said southerly line 439.00 feet; thence South 00055'30" West 300 feet to a point on the northerly margin of a parcel of land quitclaimed by the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (METRO) to King County under Auditor's File No. 8112230430; thence along said north margin North 89004'30" West 238.60 feet to the true point of beginning of the line being herein described; Thence North 73°04'46" West 46.48 feet to a point of curve, the center of said curve being North 16055'12" East 431.53 feet; thence northerly along said Curve 425.13 feet to a point of terminus on the northerly boundary line of land owned by Burlington Northern Railroad Company, said point of terminus bears North 73004'46" West 9.65 feet, thence South 89004'30" East 147.74 feet; thence North 00055'30" East 159.12 feet to the Northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 24. ALSO, All that portion of Government Lot 5, Government Lot 6, Government Lot 8, and the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Section 24; thence South 0035'36" West along the East line thereof 1,501.34 feet; thence South 77029'17" West 1,857.90 feet to the West line of that property conveyed to the City of Renton by deed recorded under Recording No. 8212090480, records of said County; thence South 18039'08" East along said West line 50.29 feet to the Southwest corner of said property conveyed to the City of Renton and the true point of beginning; thence South 77029'17" West along the southerly margin of the Burlington Northern Railroad Company Right-of-Way 644.15 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left of 905.37-foot radius; thence along said curve and southerly margin a distance of 267.55 feet through a central angle of 1605'5'55" to the West tine of aforesaid Southwest quarter of Northeast quarter of Section 24; thencfSputh 1005'00" West along said west Line 142.62 feet to the nprthwesterly margirbf that portion of the right-of-way of Primary State Highway No. 1 (Interstate 405) identified on the 4 . \ • liig;hway map rec ordod iindei .Auditor'•, rile No. 5399473, Records, of said t 'oonty, as the B-line: Sc'tth,yest-rly along; said ir,,riliwesterly margin and the arc of ,c Curve, the origin of whi '.h hears South 2" I :.t'I (," I:,r:,t 25L.00 feet, a distance of 174.03 feet through a Central angle of 39"h li 3r!" to a point of tangency in said margin; thence South 47053'14" \Vest along said northwesterly margin 243.18 feet to the north line of aforesaid Government Lot 3; thence North 87034'33" \Vest along said north line 16.07 feet to the easterly margin of aforesaid Burlington Northern Railroad Company Right-of-Way; thence Southerly along said easterly margin and the arc of a curve, the origin of which bears South 62024'27" East 905.37 feet, a distance of 181.53 feet through a central angle of 11029'16" to a line parallel with and 70.00 feet Northwesterly of the centerline of Washington State Highway No. 1- L; thence South 66052'50" West along said parallel line 139.79 feet to the westerly margin of aforesaid Burlington Northern Railroad Company Right-of-Way; thence Northwesterly along said westerly margin and the arc of a curve, the origin of which hears South 39°58'05" V'e',t 1,134.00 feet, a distance of 1,189.15 feet through a central angle of 60°04'S7" to an intersection with the centerline of Monster Road S.W. as said road is now constructed; thence North 50°43'53" West along said centerline 92.02 feet to the beginning of curve to the right of 632.74-foot radius; thence along said curve and centerline an arc distance of 199.95 feet through a central angle of 18006'22" to the northerly margin of aforesaid Burlington Northern Railroad company Right-of-Way; thence South 65054'06" East along said northerly margin 156.06 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right of 1,234.00-foot radius; thence along said curve and northerly margin 220.76 feet through a central angle of 10°15'00" to the beginning of a. curve to the left of 1,737.41-foot radius; thence along said curve and northerly margin 172.96 feet through a central angle of 5042'14" to a point of tangency therein; thence South 61°21'20" East along said northerly margin 43.60 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left of 1,382.69-foot radius; thence along said curve and Northerly margin 956.61 feet through a central angle of 39°38'23" to a point of tangency therein; thence North 79000'17" East along said northerly margin 10.30 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left of 3,162.98-foot radius; thence along said curve and northerly margin 83.73 feet through a central angle of 1°31'00" to a point of tangency therein; thence North 77°29'17" Last along said northerly margin 647.26 feet to aforesaid westerly line of property conveyed to the city of Renton by deed recorded under Recording No. 8212090430, Records of said County; thence South 18°39'08" East along said westerly line 100.58 feet to the true point of beginning. EXCEPT that portion lying within Monster Road Southwest, if any. ALSO, That portion of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, desrihed as follows: Beginning on the east line of the Northeast C)uarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 24 at a point North 00003'30" West 1,304.20 feet from the center of said Section 24, said point being marked by an iron pipe on the line of the existing f'.•rrce marking the cast boundary of said subdivision; thence South 39034'43" West 1,050 feet, more or less, to an iron pipe on the Easterly margin of 72nd Avenue South, formerly County Rnad No. S; thence Northerly along said road margin 494 feet to the true point of beginning: thence North S9034'43" Last 200 feet; thence Northerly at right angles 300 feet; thrncc Westerly at•right angles 200 feet, 5 \. wore or I.•��,, to the Easterly margin of 72nd Avenue: South; thence Southerly along ail :rvr ni to the true point of beginning; except that portico) described as follows: P)'•I;iiu)in;.. .!t .1 point on the Easterly margin of 72nd Avenue South, 6.00 feet Northerly of the Southwest corner of the above described tract; thence North 89034'43" Last 150 feet; thence northerly at right angles 150 feet; thence Westerly at right angles 150 feet, more or less, to Easterly margin of 72nd Avenue south; thence Southerly along said avenue line to the point of beginning of this exception. ALSO, I\cginning East of Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, at a point North 0003'30" West 1 ,804.20 feet from center of said Section 24, said point being marked by an iron pipe on the line of existing fence marking East boundary of said subdivision; thence South 89034'43" West 1,050 feet, more or less, to an iron pipe on Easterly margin of 72nd Avenue South, formerly County Road No. 8; thence Northerly along said road margin 410.00 feet to the true Point of Beginning; thence North 89034'43" East 150 feet; thence Northerly at right angles 150 feet; thence Westerly at right angles 150 feet more or less to Easterly margin of 72nd Avenue South; thence Southerly along said avenue line to the true Point of Reginning. -, r• s v. yy E ri Memo IF C3. Ic] 7.1 August 22, 1988 v p �j I�t IJ y/ TO: Greg Bush FROM: Judy Cochran4 l SUBJECT: Addendum To RTP Silviculture Demonstration project DNS The purpose of this memo is to outline changes made to the above subject DNS which was issued on January 12, 1987. My staff has reviewed additional information provided by the Sludge Management program and the ESO Construction staff. Revisions made to the proposed action include the following: 1. Project Timing and Schedule: construction and related improvements would begin in Fall 1988 and complete in Spring 1989. Construction was previously scheduled to begin in February 1987 and the final phase completed in 1988 or 1989. 2. List of approvals/permits: site plan approval and special permit for grading and filling from the City of Renton. Health permit from Seattle-King County Department of Health will not be obtained by Metro since it is not required for Groco compost (Sawdust Supply Company applies directly to the permitting agency for health certification) . 3 . Specific project changes: the topsoil of the project site would consist of Groco mix and not sludge fertilizer as described in the existing checklist and DNS. Approximate total areas for Douglas-fir and hybrid poplar plantings would now be 30, 000 and 75, 000 square feet respectively. (Was previously 43,000 and 140, 000 square feet respectively) . 4 . Quantities of filling or grading proposed: there would be importation of 15, 900 cubic yards of fill materials , approximately 12,000 cubic yards of Indianola type sand and 1, 500 cubic yards of Groco mix. (11, 000 cubic yards of fill and 9, 000 cubic yard of Indianola type sand was previously Addendum August 22, 1988 Page Two proposed) . The original proposed project for a sludge application rate of 40 tons of solids per acre to meet the long-term nitrogen needs of the vegetation. It is now proposed that a six inch application of Groco mix (approximately 800 cubic yards/acre) will be used to supply an equivalent amount of nitrogen) . 5. Percentage of the site covered with impervious surfaces: none, since gravel access trails would be constructed within the demonstration site in place of asphalt proposed in the existing SEPA document. Based on the above project changes summary, we feel that additional information provided does not substantially change the analysis of impacts and alternatives outlined in the existing Checklist and DNS issued on January 12, 1987. Therefore, this addendum is appropriate, pursuant to WAC197-11-7.06 of SEPA. **************************************************************** I concur with staff review and environmental determination for this project. Manager, Environmental Planning Division Date gJZZ18 LA:e1a cc: Larry Adeyemi Roberta King Gerrie Jackson Doug Robertson hes Some- E " ' F • Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle �'�• —�. Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 D E C U 1986 RIGHT OF WAY WAC 197-11-970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNICANCE (DNS) Description of proposal: Metro proposes to develop a Silviculture demonstration at the northwest area of the Renton Treatment Plant by planting Douglas-Fir and hybrid poplars on sludge applied beds of approximately 43, 000 and 140, 000 square feet respectively. Proponent: Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (Metro) Location of proposal, including street address, if any: The project is generally located in the Renton Treatment plant and specifically at the northwest quarter of the treatment plant 'off Monster Road. Lead agency: The Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (Metro) The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS . X This DNS is issued under 197-11-340 (2) ; the lead agency will not act on this propsoal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by January 12 , 1987 • Responsible official: Gregory M. Bush Position/title: Manager/Environmental Planning Division Telephone Number: (206) 684-1164 Address: 821 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104 Date IZf 2'1 Ig, Signature ,/,^ , ::mETRD /1 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 EC.F-08S - 86 SR 'oe35 -88 GP -085 -8e ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Renton Treatment Plant Silviculture Demonstration 2. Name of applicant: Metro 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Lawrence Adeyemi Metro 821 Second Avenue, MS 92 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 (206) 684-1758 4. Date checklist prepared: December 19, 1986 5. Agency requesting checklist: Metro 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Project construction and related improvements will be phased. The first phase is scheduled to begin in January or February 1987 and the final phase completed in 1988 or 1989. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. In 1981, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the Wastewater Management Plan for the Lake Washington/Green River Basins (EPA 1981) was prepared. In that EIS, reference was made to landscaping at the Renton Treatment plant (RTP) using composted Metro sludge. The EIS also addresses site specific impacts and mitigation measures. : . • • 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Seattle-King County Department of Health permit Land Utilization permit Washington Department of Ecology's concurrence with Health Department's permit, City of Renton Building permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Metro proposes to develop a silviculture demonstration at the Renton Treatment plant. The proposed action would illustrate the effects of sludge fertilizer on tree growth. Plantings of Douglas-fir and hybrid poplars would show the differences in the growth rates between trees fertilized with sludge and those grown without sludge. Approximate total areas for Douglas-fir and hybrid poplar plantings are 43,000 and 140,000 square feet respectively. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, townships, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is generally located in the Renton Treatment plant. The project site is specially located at the Northwest quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4, East, W.M., in King County, Washington. (See attached maps.) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? About 1 percent for the planting areas but the slope adjacent to the sludge applied area is about 3%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The types of soils found on the site range from sandy-loam (classified as Puyallup Fine Sandy Loam) to sand-gravel (classified as Beausite Gravelly Sandy Loam). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling. or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There would be_importation of approximately 19,900 cubic yards (Indianola type sand) to be used as the planting medium for the demonstration project. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? About 17.8 percent of the project site would be covered with impervious surface such as roads and walkway. • h. What measures are proposed to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any? Water drainage ditches would be provided as erosion control measures and also for collecting any surface water that might leave the sludge applied beds. These measures would also minimize any possible contamination to adjacent land. In addition, erosion control grass (hydroseed) would be planted on cut and fill slopes for erosion control. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There would be short term odor when digested sludge is rototilled into soil but this diminishes rapidly as the sludge dries out. Also, dust may be created during construction and planting of Douglas-fir and poplar cuttings. There would be short term emissions from petroleum/diesel powered construction equipment. These short-term impacts are consistent with previously planned---- landscaping. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. What measures are proposed to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any? Long haul trucks that bring the sludge into the treatment plant will be covered. This minimizes odor problems along the haul route between the treatment plant and the application site. Additional measures to reduce odor after the sludge is applied would be roto-tilling the sludge into the soil at approximately two-week intervals. This would speed up the drying process and help the sludge become incorporated into the soil. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There are no water bodies of any significance in the immediate vicinity of the site except the P1 channel constructed by Corps of Engineers in 1972 for flood control. This channel runs to the east and north of the plant, previously called the Black River. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. The Renton Treatment Plant site is surrounded by a flood control dike and is further protected from flood waters by the P1 flood control channel (described in 3a(a) and the treatment plant headworks. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. •The project sites will be very flat. If there is any runoff from site it will be diverted to treatment plant headworks or a sump where it will be - - allowed to percolate. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally Y describe. No. d. What measures are proposed to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff impacts, if any? Drainage systems would direct surface water runoff into the wastewater treatment facility or into a special drainage sump for treatment. 4. Plants a. Check or underline types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Only pines that were planted on the site through landscape design will be removed and the area graded and filled and then planted with hybrid poplars and Douglas-firs. • c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. What landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures are proposed to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any? The entire project is an enhancement of the vegetation on the site by using native Douglas-firs and hybrid poplars.There would also be incidental land- scaping (ivy, shrubs) along the walkway and the perimeter of the Douglas-fir area. 5. Animals a._ Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. What measures are proposed to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any? Not applicable, however, poplar project area will probably attract wildlife. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Diesel fuel to run equipment. • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What-kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. Poplars will be harvested to provide energy biomass or fiber. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion,-spill, -or--hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) What measures are proposed to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any? Generally, the quality of sludge that would be applied to the demonstra- tion project site would meet all the health permit requirements. In addition, other measures to control environmental hazards include: o Metro Sludge Haul Contingency Plan in the event of a sludge spill. o Signs will be posted around the perimeter of the area. o Runoff will be-diverted into the existing wastewater treatment or drainage ditches and a sump. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic, construction equipment and wastewater treatment plant noise types. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. There would be short-term construction noise. 3) What measures are proposed to reduce or control noise impacts, if any? Construction noise would be limited to the period of 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. (i.e., day shift working hours). 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Undeveloped land within treatment plant property. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Public zone (P-1). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Public/quasi-public. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. What measures are proposed to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any? Not applicable. 1. What measures are proposed to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed action is to further enhance aesthetic quality of the adjacent Renton Treatment plant through special landscaping. The project has been designed by the firm handling all other landscaping at the plant to ensure compatibility. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. What measures are proposed to reduce or control housing impacts, if any? Not applicable. . • • 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? None. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. Views along Monster Road should be somewhat improved, especially at northwest corner of the plant. c. What measures are to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, proposed p s, if any any? This entire project has been designed to provide aesthetic benefits as well as educational benefits. Other improvements proposed include: asphalt roads 12 feet wide and walkways of 6 feet wide for easy circulation in the project vicinity. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. What measures are proposed to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any? None needed. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. l = b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. What -measures are proposed to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any? None would be required. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national; state, or local preservation__registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. What measures are proposed to reduce or control impacts, if any? None needed. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Interstate 405 and SW Grady Way to the south; 72nd Avenue South and Monster Road to the west; and SW 7th Street to the northeast of the project site. There will be an access road from Monster Road through the demonstration project site and connecting with the plant's internal road network. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None. Parking is available at the treatment plant administration building. • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?. If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No significant impacts would result from visitors traffic to the project. g. What measures are proposed to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any? None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. What measures are proposed to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. Utilities a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Onsite irrigation system, similar to the other landscaping at the plant. No new connections are required. ' C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: t SCE 4f /S Date Submitted: 2CelzharleA 474 197 PS/EP3/12 • '`- 4.7----..,!:e___,.: s/ ., . ... fria.,.. ... o c/ry c/AILE.;,,, ..- . j " \ \fL i � • i tr . ' %il\ S', V .‘3.:AS. /I c i ii � � A S � A si ? 7 •Vic% G \ l ID _ /GN A 4e,� w i 2 trl , - . \ 'Vt... /'-'r \ -....,- ,••ii!iVlIlr WZ • �j� �'4! 4 0 CI \\ % . . e, \ .'( 1 . . .... 4.',.,.,. ;,,,,, : 0 tu 41i..'s Kno-Rram ._... a . u\ c.... . . *,, , %...i.1! :,%:, --— ,,o, 0 •,\A 0 ,,,., --..e....,..7\ ••...... \ , - .. —..,_ k . \4.., d 5EATTLE �> / . \•\ 0 400 BOO 1200 V TACOMA� ac RENWN / t FEET • ,: S. W'. 7T 4 4 ' , h 7NTNL?AI 3EWA6E \ ` • A/RPORT W TREATMENT \ u. I 4.4. PLANT \ O - \. •' I / \\ • EARLINGrON GOLF COURSE h 1 h • /• i; o KENT : j h \ <;;; -c. • • 1/ 1 \ -�- © oAUBURN ' \\ �� 0 r... RENTON :0: O 1 \ TREATMENT tti —\\ j^ \ An' ` PLANT • . �\ „�•. ,.N J / SCALE / r' i. SY IN MILES • _%� Or • --N...„. i \ . • �� L „,- . 1111111„.------------- r........ .PUYALLUP / \\ i V490?) j2 • VICINITY MAP • ..4\\\\ GR Apt S ►~ 1 \\\ OFP .- \ f' j Q tL; 0„7" ► v 2 / . ..� ..••• •1 i •••.-t A f fj 2 . II.****‘.../ :Z.:. :...: t..v.: .. .. ; .i .• 1 .. • 1 4. r ----: ';i CD (1111,0,iiiiirAtoiR/"--FRV . pr. r. : : ; b V � 2 o �• � b• J LONGACRES • - k t1111 RACE TRACK t t ' —3.--/3ArN . t f LOCATION MAP — 1 ' otaswtD: Dui�� - t`'.)METRO Munkipality of Metropolitan Seattle Ill/No. mom: CM/CMID: /C•LI: . DOM MO. MICOrMIMOIO: CM AWING MO. •ruovto: POUT Or M C •( v l(I G• III Orr( _. — — e s III II II • II , I I II I II II 'I I � I ' II I II i I 1 II II 1 i I i I II , it I1 .. . . .. • a• I . V ,. i • lllIll.lIllllllIllllllllIllIllllIIlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlIIlIIIIIIIIIlIlIIlIIllIllllIllIllllIllllllllIl.I.I.I......'.''---.--..,,,/ ............... ... .... 1 ----."•-••,, . lir . 0 440 41#1 r- ..\. 44 ' V .104-.^-ts-aoglogro -N. P.‘.1. ifi: • .4 -ible,etterottidi,..0.4, ''.-- , ... '- ''''' • . 1 *kb to • e 0,01 \ ' - - , !;,,... ,:f. . •, _.... P ,6Ik .......m 'AL. AL MA& & .."............ .. ...:.• 44' \ . girtgPV; #OK 4.4&9116.01.13\ • ." .."......- '.-"." .." .. . .'. .. .... • . 1:... .. 4 N• '_.,...:. '''..ode / ole•ire N 9-firs‘ . s s DEMO AREA I . • .,. .. s'i*. • .' .1---... :.v., /49.00,40,040-0,2)\ Coriff,0P411cot BIOIVIA. . . ... . ':: :. ... '' . .. ... - Pri : elit00.4"ii.0‘ 04,440.• • 7:•- • ::. . .... ...6 - ltIrifeattlbel A 40. 4 140,000 S.F. 7:— r• • ••: f•e01.0,.. 1,04.0* v4Altigorpb il.. . . . ..\•,;___3p,11,_ ,\1312:401:12 Iltp,;* ilir Oto*Or 0 . N . .... ..........111: •.: ‘: 0..-1, Vocifitota **POI • • ' 4010 blelWd)V,. VII1VVVI .- 0 .1.:;. :: . • :ft.M. ". .::trk .,ovit,b/ istvory ::..'•.' ....4 •:.• • ••;i. 13,, l'•• surgpow - ..f,.L: •••1 ::. : .. ••: .ie., /ve,t-pj-slop :.:.:::•"::: ,. .•.; .:••if!./,,tveP.,(0.4?' . .: •,,..:....• ....• • ......t ./,,,w4tstwolfr - --.:71.-• - • • . ..wtroottki , ,..- - _.....•\ . . . Ave. 000 MONSTER ROAD CONNECTION ,r:.,: . ...,.:. ..• .. ,... . ,.. woo. (•••• A ''•:::•...::::-:..:•'.i.'. ;.!11141.1 • . . .\ • ••:..... ...:•;• li , • •••.. ••••. .'", .•• .. ,. \ . . 1:•. Xj 1•:: • •• •• • ‘ • . .. . • ... . 1 . \ .!• 1 "BUTLER BLDG. \ ....• - ‘. i. . \Ud4. \ • • ' V N \ ' • - I\ • • .!..;•"1 ... \••,:.:'..:..\ '.•..r5.,:.:71.H .r.:: : %INTERNAL ROAD CONNECTION• . .•I '.. , • i 71 , p . 0 /...2* .:. .. • . 43,000 S.F• FIR DEMO AREA",. .. / v<e4, ..Niii,•••••• .d,.' , / •,,i'l . • . //d• ' A:1. t:' .i- ' i ••-• • . / / .:....( •;4'-W• :-. •••• ••••••••.: '.. •• •••••*f Is • .• i - _.„---- ••• , • '• • • • . , • •.• :.:•:, Ti..1.1!Nit:,:i 1 / •••: .. .: % ' . • , '., \ . ::3 ' i '• ‘ N • .... / // PEO6 WALK , .. • . / • ' e• . • • / / CJ 0 . i I ' ,-------- , - I 0 N.T.S. ° ' g i SOS MS 1.02 i .---— ® N.T.S. 0 y.. 1 0 N.T.S.© • s). ) . . ') � III " I 1 I II III II 'I i1 I' II I1' I '11 �I III I ili 1 I I I II ' I I I I\I 'I I 1 i II II II AUG 2 6O Cy RENTON TREATMENT PLANT FOREST DEMONSTRATION ' ' to As part of the landscaping at the expanded Renton Treatment Plant, Metro proposes to demonstrate how sludge can be used as asoil amendment to increase tree growth. The University of Washington, which has studied the use of sludge in silviculture for 15 years, has the only suitable location for public tours--the University 's Pack Forest research facility in Eatonville, Washington. By establishing a demonstration at the Renton Treatment Plant, Metro will bring the educational aspects of Pack Forest closer 1 to Seattle-King County residents. As part of the project, the agency would publicize the demonstration and encourage organized tours. At the treatment plant, Douglas fir and hybrid poplar will be planted in selected areas. Both the Douglas fir and poplar plantings would be divided into two sections: one with composted sludge added to the soil and one without composted sludge. The objective is to illustrate the beneficial effects of sludge for silviculture and landscaping by recreating the dramatic differences in growth and vigor of the trees between the control and composted sludge-fertilized areas that one would see at Pack Forest. Douglas fir was chosen for the demonstration because it is the primary species managed by the forest industry in Washington and Oregon. The hybrid poplar selected for use in the project is a black cottonwood-eastern cottonwood cross developed by the University of Washington-Washington State University forest geneticists for its rapid growth. The use of sludge on poplars is beneficial because it grows wood quickly. Metro is exploring the commercial use of poplars for pulp or fuel. Long-term plans for the demonstration include cutting portions of the hybrid poplar area to demonstrate coppicing-- regenerating the trees by cutting and allowing stumps to sprout. The proposed demonstration areas, which are located at the north end of the treatment plant site, were designed as an integral part of the treatment plant landscaping (see attached design). The Douglas firs will provide year-round greenery for the area. The hybrid poplars will enhance the natural contours of the treatment plant landscape and provide a park-like effect when viewed from Monster Road and Oaksdale Boulevard. The poplars will develop quickly into attractive, full-size deciduous trees (15 feet tall in two years) that are similar to the natural vegetation surrounding the treatment plant area. Pedestal-type information signs that explain different aspects of the demonstration will be positioned at the beginning of the walkway and along the path. A general display and brochures summarizing the purpose of the plantings will be placed in the administration building. This information also will mention Metro's use of GroCo throughout the plant for landscaping so that visitors will learn about all aspects of Metro's sludge recycling program. Metro intends to provide guided tours of the demonstration areas for visitors. The hybrid poplar demonstration area will be 74,799 square feet, or approximately 1.7 acres. The Douglas fir area will be 26,599 square feet, or about .7 acre. Poplar Sludge/compost application area 65,490 sf, or 1.5 ac Control area 9,309 sf, or 0.2 ac Douglas fir Sludge/compost application area 19,249 sf, or 0.4 ac Control area 7,350 sf, or 0.2 ac 1 • • SOILS The Douglas fir demonstration will be located at the northeast corner of the treatment plant property in an area that has been filled with excavation materials. The original soil of the demonstration area is a Puyallup alluvial soil. This is a fine- textured, very deep agricultural soil. However, this area also has mixed disturbed soils because excavation materials from the water tower hill area were deposited here. The area will be graded and fill material deposited to create a grade compatible with plans for future grading of the areas adjacent to the demonstration project. Based on the advice of University of Washington College of Forestry researchers who have 15 years of sludge application experience at Pack Forest, we will import a sandy, well-drained soil--Indianola series--to use as the planting medium. The Indianola soil fill will be three-feet deep and will cover the planting areas. Sludge compost will be used to amend the soil by providing nutrients and organic matter. CONSTRUCTION Soil preparation will begin in fall 1988 or winter 1989 depending on when permits are secured. Compost deliveries will begin as soon as site preparations are complete. The compost will be deposited on top of the sandy fill in the graded cleared planting areas. The compost will be spread by a tractor with a blade and then rototilled into the soil. Planting of the poplars and Douglas fir should begin in late winter - early spring 1989. PLANTING STOCK Three-year-old Douglas firs, about two and one-half feet tall, will be planted in eight- foot by eight-foot spacings. This plan will give a fully stocked, green look to the newly planted area. High-quality seedlings from a western Washington forest nursery will be used. Poplar cuttings (twigs with no leaves and no roots) will be obtained from a plantation established at the University of Washington's Pack Forest. The cuttings will be planted in ten-foot spacings. The trees should be six to ten or nine feet tall after the first growing season, with a full crown of large leaves. By the second year, the poplars will be about 12-17 feet tall. Staggered cutting (coppicing) schedules over the years will maintain this area's attractiveness and still provide rapidly growing wood for fiber or energy for the demonstration. The site will be hydroseeded with grass for erosion control on slopes and to create a park-like setting among the trees. Metro's Environmental Planning Division issued a DNS (Determination of Non- Significance) for this project January 12, 1987. WX/CWQ1/11 2 r Ca4 y `" • pi fAtet.A d11A9► DIVISION 1 - GENERAL „�� REQUIREMENTS lY• Y1 a '�' '" y SECTION 01560 - 1 EAV pg30 i`' ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS PART 1--GENERAL 1 .01 DESCRIPTION This section specifies temporary environmental controls required to be maintained during construction. PART 2--PRODUCTS There are no products this section. PART 3--EXECUTION 3.01 SITE MAINTENANCE The Contractor shall keep the work sitt clean and free from rubbish and de- bris. Materials and equipment shall be removed from the site when they are no longer necessary. Upon completion of the work and before final acceptance, the work site shall be cleared of equipment, unused materials, and rubbish to present a clean and neat appearance in conformance with the present condition of • the site. Refer to each section for further requirements. A. CLEAN-UP: 1 . Waste material of any kind will not be permitted to remain on the site of the work or on adjacent streets. Immediately, upon such materials becom- ing unfit for use in the work, they shall be collected, carried off the site and disposed of by the Contractor. 2. The Contractor shall keep all buildings occupied by the Contrac- tor clear of all refuse, rubbish and debris that may accumulate from any source and shall keep them in a neat condition to the satisfaction of the Engineer. 3. In the event that waste material, refuse, debris and/or rubbish are not so removed from the work by the Contractor, the Municipality reserves the right to have the waste material, refuse, debris and/or rubbish removed and the expense of the removal and disposal charged to the Contractor. B. STREET CLEANING: I• 1 . The Contractor shall be responsible for preventing dirt and dust from escaping from trucks departing the project site, by covering dusty loads, washing truck tires before leaving the site, or other reasonable methods. I -_ • . DIVISION 1 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS SECTION 01560 - 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS 2. When working dump trucks and/or other equipment on paved streets and roadways, the Contractor will be required to clean said streets if required by the Engineer at the conclusion of each day's operations. 3. Any violation of the above requirements shall be sufficient ground for the Engineer to order the streets in question cleaned by others, the cost of the operation to be paid by the Contractor. I 3.02 TEMPORARY DAMS 1 Except in time of emergency, earth dams are not acceptable at catch basin 1 openings, local depressions, or elsewhere. Temporary dams of sand bags, asphal- tic concrete, or other acceptable material will be permitted when necessary to protect the work, provided their use does not create a hazard or nuisance to the public. Such dams shall be removed from the site as soon as they are no longer necessary. 3.03 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL • The Contractor shall not discharge smoke; dust, and other contaminants into the atmosphere that violate the regulations of any legally constituted author- ity. The Contractor shall also minimize dust nuisance by cleaning, sweeping, and sprinkling with water, or other means. The use of water, in amounts which result in mud on public streets, is not acceptable as a substitute for sweeping or other methods. • 3.04 NOISE CONTROL A. Construction involving noisy operations shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Noisy operations shall be scheduled to. minimize their duration. • B. The Contractor shall comply with all local controls and noise level rules, regulations and ordinances which apply to any work performed pursuant to the Contract. C. Each internal combustion engine, used for any purpose on the job or related to the job, shall be equipped with a muffler of a type recommended by the manufacturer. No internal combustion engine shall be operated on the project without said muffler. D. Noise levels for scrapers, pavers, graders and trucks shall not exceed 90 dBA and pile drivers shall not exceed 95 dBA at 50 feet as measured under the noisiest operating conditions. For all other equipment, noise levels shall not exceed 85 dBA. Equipment that cannot meet these levels shall be quieted by use of improved exhaust mufflers or other means. I i I �I I I I ,V �I _ DIVISION 1 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS SECTION 01560 - 3 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS 3.05 TREE AND PLANT PROTECTION A. TEMPORARY TREE PROTECTION: The Contractor shall carefully protect existing trees as directed by the Engineer or the Engineer's representative. The Contractor shall pay for damages to trees resulting from insufficient or improper protection. B. CULTIVATED AREAS AND OTHER SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS: All landscaped areas and other surface improvements which are damaged by actions of the Contractor shall be restored as nearly as possible to their original condition. 3.06 WATER CONTROL A. TEMPORARY PUMPING AND DRAINAGE: 1 . The Contractor shall conform to the regulations and requirements of legally authorized surface water management agencies. 2. The Contractor shall be responsible for keeping trenches. and ar- eas other than the building excavation free from water as required to permit continuous progress of, or to prevent damage to its own work or the work of oth- ers. The Contractor's operations shall be conducted in such a manner as to pre- vent sediment from reaching the sewer. Temporary settling ponds shall be pro- vided in the work area as required to trap runoff until the turbidity has settled and the water can be pumped into the sewer. **END OF SECTION** I I RENTON DEMONSTRATION FOREST PROJECT DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK I TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 02100 CLEARING AND GRUBBING SECTION 02200 EARTHWORK SECTION 0248 0 LANDSCAPING SECTION 02810 IRRIGATION SYSTEM SECTION 02999 MISCELLANEOUS SITE WORK • I DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02100 - 1 CLEARING AND GRUBBING I I PART 1 - GENERAL 1 .01 DESCRIPTION This section specifies site clearing and grubbing. 1 .02 JOB CONDITIONS A. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The Contractor shall determine the actual condition of the site as it af- fects this portion of work. :ite clearing and grubbing shall not damage structures, landscaping or veg- ' etation adjacent to the site. The Contractor shall repair or replace any dam- aged property to as good or better than existing condition, as determined by the Construction Manager. IPART 2 - PRODUCTS Not Used. PART 3 - EXECUTION I3.01 GENERAL The Contractor shall notify the Construction Manager when site clearing is I complete. Further work shall not be started until the conditions of Paragraph 02100-1 .02 are satisfied. 3.02 PERFORMANCE IA. CLEARING AND GRUBBING: I 1 . The Contractor shall notify Construction Manager prior to com- mencing any clearing and grubbing activities, including that intended for survey or other site investigation work. 2. No trees or significant vegetation shall be removed without au- thorization from Construction Manager. I I __ DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02100 - 2 CLEARING AND GRUBBING 3. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall remove obstructions such as brush, trees, logs, stumps, roots, heavy sod, vegetation, rock, stones larger than 6 inches in any dimension, broken or old concrete and pavement, debris, and structures where the completion of the work require their removal. Notify Construction Manager if large concrete pieces are encountered. 4. Material that is removed and is not to be incorporated in the work shall be disposed of off the site. B. UTILITY INTERFERENCE: Where existing utilities interfere with the work, the Contractor shall re- locate them in accordance with Section. 01010, Subsection 4.0. C. PROTECTION: The Contractor shall provide protection devices, including barricades, fencing, warning signs, lights and other things necessary to ensure the security - of, and safety within, the project site during this phase of the work. **END OF SECTION** • I I I IDIVISION 2 - SITEWORK • SECTION 02200 - 1 - EARTHWORK PART 1 - GENERAL 1 1 .01 DESCRIPTION • 1 This section specifies earthwork which consists of exdavation, filling, grading, and excess material control. All work shall be accomplished in- the dry. Fill materials and filter fabric is also included in this section. • I1 .02 DEFINITIONS A. COMPACTION: I • The degree of compaction is specified as percent compaction. Maximum or relative densities refer to dry soil densities obtainable at optimum moisture Icontent. B. EXCAVATION SLOPE: • IExcavation slope shall be defined as an inclined surface formed by removing material from below existing grade. IC. EMBANKMENT SLOPE: ' Embankment slope shall be defined as an inclined surface formed by place- ! ment of material above existing grade. 1 .03 QUALITY ASSURANCE IA. REFERENCES: This section references the latest revisions of the following documents. I They are a part of this section insofar as specified and modified herein. In case of conflict between the requirements of this section and the listed documents, the requirements of this sectionshall prevail. IIReference Title AASHO T176 Plastic Fines in Graded Aggregates and Soils by 1 use-of the Sand Equivalent Test ASTM C136 Method of Test for Sieve or Screen Analysis of U Fine and Coarse Aggregates ASTM D1556 Method of Test for Density of Soil in Place - by the Sand-Cone Method li , ASTM D1557 Method of Test for Moisture-Density Relations of Soils, Using 10 Lb (4.5 kg) Rammer and 18 In. (457 mm) Drop 1 _ - 1 DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02200 - 2 EARTHWORK 'ASTM D3017 Method of Test for Moisture Content of Soil and Soil Aggregates In Place by Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth) ASTM D422 Method of Test for Sieve or Screen and Hydrometer Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggre- gates B. TESTS: 1 . The Construction Manager will take samples and perform moisture content, gradation, compaction, and density tests during placement of backfill materials to check compliance with these specifications. The Contractor shall remove surface material at locations designated by the Construction Manager and provide such assistance as necessary for sampling and testing. The Construction Manager may direct the Contractor to construct inspection trenches in compacted or consolidated backfill to determine that the Contractor has complied with these specifications. Testing by the Construction Manager does not relieve the Contractor of its responsibility to determine to its own satisfaction when and if its work meets the specification. Payment for inspection trenches shall be as specified in Paragraph 00710-4.05. 2. Tests will be made by the Construction Manager in accordance with the following: Test Standard Procedure fMoisture content ASTM D3017 Gradation ASTM C126, D422 Density in-place ASTM D1556 Moisture-density relationships ASTM D1557 C. SUBMITTALS: Samples of all imported fill materials to be used shall be submitted 30 days in advance of use. Samples shall consist of 0.5 cubic feet of each type of material. - PART 2 - MATERIALS 2.01 FILL MATERIALS •I A. INDIANOLA SOIL: 1 . Indianola soil shall be a clean gravel-sand mixture, essentially free from organic matter and shall conform to the following gradation: DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02200 - 3 EARTHWORK U.S. standard Percent by sieve size weight passing 3/4-inch 98-100 3/8-inch 95-100 No. 8 85-100 No. 16 80-90 I No. 30 80-90 No. 50 20-35 No. 100 2-6 No. 200 0.5-3 B. TYPE C: Type C material shall be unclassified material, and shall be used as subgrade fill material. The material shall be free from peat, wood, roots, bark, debris, garbage, rubbish or other extraneous material. The maximum size of stone shall not exceed 6 inches. Type C material shall be obtained from Ion-site excavations, as directed by the Construction Manager, and from off-site sources. There shall be no more than 20 percent silt and clay in the content. C. TYPE D: Type D material shall be granular material commonly known as pea gravel and shall conform to the following gradation: U.S. standard Percent by sieve size weight passing I3/4 inch 100 3/8 inch 95-100 INo. 8 0-5 D. TYPE F: 1 . Type F material shall be crushed rock and shall conform to the following gradation: U.S. standard Percent by sieve size weight passing I 5/8 inch 100 1/4 inch 55-75 No. 40 8-24 No. 200 0-10 2. Type F material shall be composed of hard, durable, sound pieces having a specific gravity of not less than 2.65. I I I DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02200 - 4 EARTHWORK PART 3 - EXECUTION I 3.01 GENERAL I A. CONTROL OF WATER: 1 . The Contractor shall keep excavations free from water during con struction. The static water level shall be drawn down a minimum of 2 feet below the bottom of excavations to maintain the undisturbed state of natural soils and I allow the placement of pipe and any fill to the specified density. Disposal of water shall not damage property or create a public nuisance. The Contractor shall have on hand pumping equipment and machinery in good working condition for emergency and shall have workers available for its operation. 2. Groundwater shall be controlled to prevent "boils" and softening. of the bottom of excavations, or formation of "quick" conditions. Dewatering systems shall not remove natural soils. B. EXCAVATED MATERIAL: I1 . Unless otherwise specified, suitable excavated material (fill) shall be used as fill as directed by the Construction Manager. Unsuitable exca- vated materials such as peat shall be disposed of off-site unless otherwise di- rected by the Construction Manager. 2. Surplus excavated material shall be disposed of off-site immedi- ately after excavation by the Contractor, at the Contractor's expense, in ac- cordance with applicable ordinances and environmental requirements. I3. Material shall not be stockpiled to a depth greater than 5 feet above foundation grade, within 25 feet of any excavation or structure. The Con- tractor shall use construction methods which preserve the stability of the soil adjacent to any excavation. 4. Any materials stockpiled for reuse must be protected from wind or rain erosion, by covering with tarps or other effective methods. C. IMPORTED SUHGRADE: To supplement excavated fill material, Type C material to complete the em- bankments shall be obtained from off-site sources. D. HAULING AND TRAFFIC PATTERNS: 1 . When hauling is done over highways or city streets, the loads shall be trimmed and the vehicle shelf areas shall be cleaned after each load- ing. The loads shall be watered after trimming to minimize dust. No trucks DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02200 - 5 IEARTHWORK shall be loaded in excess of their legal gross vehicle weight in accordance with AASHTO SW-6-74, "Recommended Policy on Maximum Dimensions and Weights of Motor Vehicles to be Operated Over the Highways of the United States." 2. The Contractor shall maintain traffic patterns in the existing filled areas which preserve the stability of the soil under all future planting areas. E. FINISH GRADING: 1 . Finished surfaces shall be smooth, compacted and free from ir- regularities. The degree of finish shall be that normally obtainable with a blade-grader. 2. Finished grade shall be as specified by the contours ±0.20 foot except where a local change in elevation is required to match sidewalks, curbs, manholes and catch basins, or to ensure proper drainage. Where no contours or grades are shown for lawn or hydroseed areas, the Contractor shall grade the area smooth (±0.20 foot) and slope the area for positive drainage. 3. When the work is in an intermediate stage of completion, the lines and grades shall be as specified ±0.5 foot to provide adequate drainage. F. CONTROL OF EROSION: ' The Contractor shall maintain earthwork surfaces true and smooth and pro- tected from erosion. Where erosion occurs, the Contractor shall provide fill or shall excavate as necessary to return earthwork surfaces to the grade and finish specified. 3.02 CLASSIFICATION OF FILL Fill material shall be placed in horizontal layers and compacted with power operated tampers, rollers, idlers, or vibratory equipment. Material type, maximum layer depth, relative compaction, and general application are specified in Table A. Unless otherwise specified, fill classes shall be used where specified in Table A under general application. 1 1 1 r 1 DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02200 - 6 EARTHWORK Table A, Fill Classifications Maximum Minimum uncompressed relative Fill Material layer depth, compaction, Class type inches percent General application Indianola Soil 8 85 . Planting areas. Cl C 8 85 Subsequent pipeline backfill in unimproved areas and site fill. D1 D - 95 Bedding for single pipes in confined trenches. F1 F 6 95 Path surfacing. • 3.03 EARTHWORK A. EXCAVATION: Except as otherwise shown or specified, any method of excavation within the work limits and easements shown may be used which, in the opinion of the Con- tractor, is considered best. At those locations where the excavation extends be- low the static groundwater level or the natural soils are saturated and of low strength, the Contractor shall take whatever precautions are necessary to main- - tain the undisturbed state of the foundation soils at and below the bottom of the excavation. B. BACKFILL: 1 . Unless otherwise specified, p placement of all fill materials shall be in accordance with Table A. 2. Fill shall be placed in 18-inch lifts. If the compacted surface of any layer of material is too smooth to bond properly with the succeeding layer, the surface shall be scarified. - If required, the surface shall be sprinkled or oth- erwise moisture conditioned before the succeeding lift is placed. Any surface crust formed on a layer of fill material that has been dumped and spread shall be broken up by harrowing and, if required, the full depth of the affected layer shall be moisture conditioned immediately prior to rolling. 1 1 DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02200 - 7 EARTHWORK • 3.04 EARTHWORK FOR PIPELINES AND CONDUITS Earthwork for pipelines and conduits is specified in Table A and in the standard details. 3.05 SITE FILL Unless otherwise specified, site fill shall be Class C1 fill. If the exist- ing slope in an area to be filled is greater than 5:1 , the Contractor shall bench the area prior to filling. 3.06 FINISH All areas covered by the work, including excavated and filled sections and transition areas, shall be graded uniformly to the elevations shown. The fin- ished surface shall be reasonably smooth, compacted, and free from any irregular surface changes. The degree of finish shall be that ordinarily obtainable from a blade-grader operation. The finish surface shall be not more than 0.2-foot above or below the established. grade. Ditches shall be finished to drain readily. **END OF SECTION** I I • • p IDIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02480 - 1 LANDSCAPING 13 - I PART '1--GENERAL 1 .01 DESCRIPTION A. This section specifies materials and labor required for the • landscaping of all specified plant material. B. Landscaping shall. include soil preparation and fine grading, plant installation, hydroseeding, cleanup, and maintenance work. 1 .02 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. MANUFACTURER'S QUALIFICATIONS: • The Contractor shall cause the materials to be furnished under this sec- tion to be the product of firms regularly engaged in the cultivation of the specified species or manufacture "of a specified material. The landscaping mate- ' rials shall be removed and installed by specialists possessing sufficient tech- nical competence, skills, resources and ability to complete the work specified under this section with a requisite degree of competence in a timely manner. • B. QUALITY CONTROL: • The drawings, specifications and other Contract documents are not in- t tended to control the method of performing the work, but only the requirements • as to the nature of the completed work; the Contractor assumes the entire re- sponsibility for proper methods of performing, installing and controlling the ' quality of the work to achieve specified results. C. CODES AND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS: • All construction should be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code. Any material specified by reference to the number, symbol, or title of a spe cific standard, such as commercial standard, federal specification, a trade as-. sociation standard or other similar standard, shall comply with the requirements . in the latest revision thereof and any amendment with supplement thereto in ef- fect on the date of invitation for bids, except as limited to type, class or grade, when modified in such reference. D. SUBMITTALS TO BE PROVIDED: 11 The Contractor shall provide the following submittals in accordance with Section 01300: 1 . Materials lists showing all materials proposed for use PI in the work and order dates necessary to insure timely delivery to the site. II • I " DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02480 - 2 LANDSCAPING 2. Supplier and supplier's type designation for all hy- droseed. 1 .03 WARRANTY In addition to the general guarantee required by this contract, the Con- tractor shall furnish the Construction Manager with the item supplier's written warranty that all materials provided under this section will be free from de- fects for a period of 1 year. This warranty shall include replacing and plant- ing the same size and species of plant material as shown on the drawings or in- cluded in the plant list that proves to be in the wrong location or is designated to be replaced by the Construction Manager. Rejected plants are to be removed from the site immediately. 1 .04 REFERENCES This section references the latest revision of the following documents. They are a part of this section as specified and modified. In case of conflict between the requirements of this section and those of the listed documents, the requirements of the section shall prevail. Reference Title ASTM E11-81 Wire-Cloth Sieves for Testing Purposes 1 .05 PROJECT CLOSEOUT A. FINAL CLEANUP: All landscaped and staging areas shall be maintained in a clean, neat. and orderly manner at all times. Prior to final inspection, the Contractor shall remove all deleterious material and debris from all areas, rake neatly all planting areas to an even fine grade, wash and clean all hard surfaces. B. FINAL INSPECTION: Final inspection shall determine completion of contract work. Final in- spection shall be made by the Construction Manager upon receipt of due notice requesting such inspection . This notice shall be a minimum of two days prior to anticipated date for inspection. The site must be thoroughly cleaned and all work completed at the time of final inspection. If the work is not complete, the Construction Manager will provide a listing of replacement items which are subject to guarantee or other requirement necessary for acceptance of the work. ' - I DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02480 - 3 LANDSCAPING C. COMPLETION OF WORK: Prior to acceptance of the work, the Contractor shall provide record drawings as specified in Section 01720. PART 2--PRODUCTS 2.01 MATERIALS A. TOPSOIL: Topsoil shall be Groco mix as supplied by Sawdust Supply Company, or ap- proved supplier. B. HYDROSEED MATERIALS: 1 . HYDROSEEDING MULCH. Hydroseeding mulch shall be 100 per- cent wood cellulose mulch dyed with a non-toxic green. - 2. TACKIFIER. Tackifier shall be an organic biodegradable binder made to hold mulch to soil. Wildflower hydroseeding on the slopes shall Ise J-Tac stabilizer. 3. SEED. Total weed seed for mixture shall not exceed one percent. 1 a. A complete analysis of the seed shall be submit- ted, including percent of pure seed, germination, other crop seed, inert and wWeed, and the germination test date. All crop seed in excess of one percent must be itemized. b. All seeds shall conform to the requirements of the Washington State Law and when applicable the Federal Seed Act. c. All seed shall be free of seeds of weeds listed a primary noxious be the Washington State Seed Law. Seed shall not contain seeds of weeds listed as secondary noxious by the Washington State Seed Law sin- gularly or collectively in excess of the labeling tolerance specified by the Washington State Seed Law. d. When seeds furnished under this specification fail to meet the requirements within tolerance as provided by the Washington State Seed Law, the lot shall be rejected or subjected to fiscal adjustment. Bids shall be compared on a pure live seed basis. I I� ill I' II I I , I' II I, II DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02480 - 4 LANDSCAPING e. Seeds shall be thoroughly recleaned and of uniformly good quality and appearance throughout each lot. Seeds shall be packed in clean, sound containers of uniform weight. Seed shall be labeled as required by law. • 4. WILDFLOWER MIX. Wildflower seed mix shall be Meadow Lawn Mix as prepared by Briargreen, Kent, Washington, and shall consist of wildflow- ers and rye/fescue mix. 5. GRASS SEED MIX. Grass seed mix shall be composed of the following grasses by weight: Chewing or Creeping Red Fescue 4 parts Perennial Ryegrass 4 parts Colonial Bentgrass 1 part Dutch White Clover (Inoc.) 1 part All seed shall be pure, live seed fresh, latest crop. Grass seed shall be Wash- ington State certified grade. • D. HERBICIDES: Post-emergent herbicide shall be selected so that herbicide residual shall not interfere with planting schedule. E. WATER: The Contractor shall make, at its own expense, whatever arrangements may be necessary to ensure an adequate supply of water to meet the needs of this Contract. The Contractor shall furnish all necessary hose, equipment, attach- ments, and accessories for the adequate watering of plant areas as may be re • - quired to complete the work as specified. F. PLANT MATERIAL: The Construction Manager will provide planting stock to the Contractor. The Contractor will not be held liable for costs for furnishing poplar or Douglas fir seedlings for the demonstration area. Seedlings shall be planted in accordance with the contract requirements. PART 3--EXECUTION 3.01 SITE GRADING AND SOIL PREPARATION A. AREAS TO BE HYDROSEEDED (EXCEPT DEMONSTRATION AND CONTROL PLANTING AREAS) : II I II fl i fit If f � I � �tl I fll . I fl II I I111 fl I I III i �fl �I i I I II i I DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02480 - 5 LANDSCAPING In all areas to be hydroseeded, the Contractor shall rototill to a depth of 12 inches removing all rocks, clods, roots and debris over 3 inches in any dimension. Spread a minimum of 6 inches of Groco. Rototill and thoroughly mix Groco topsoil with subgrade. . Provide a consistent, smooth planting bed. Com- pact subgrade and Groco at 85 percent maximum density. Areas to be planted with Wildflower mix shall be irrigated for two weeks and treated with a post-emergent herbicide in accordance with the manufacturer's written instructions to control existing annual and perennial weeds. Application shall be completed to comply with manufacturer's recommendations regarding her- bicide residual to preclude conflict with the residual and hydroseed schedule. See Section 02480 - 3.01 .B for site grading and soil preparation for hydroseeding in the Demonstration Planting Area. B. DEMONSTRATION AND CONTROL PLANTING AREA: The Contractor shall prepare a consistent subgrade 3'-6" below top of adjacent finish grade. The Contractor shall then rototill to a depth of 12 inches removing all rocks, clods., roots, and debris over 3 inches in any dimen- sion. A consistent subgrade of 3 feet of Indianola soil shall be prepared over both demonstrational planting areas and control areas as shown on the drawings and specified in Section 02200, EARTHWORK. The Contractor shall then place 6 inches of Groco on the prepared sur- face of the Biomass and Douglas fir demonstration areas and rototill to a depth of 8 inches. The Contractor shall place 6 inches of Indianola soil (not Groco) over the two control areas. Supply additional Groco and Indianola soil to bring planting bed grade even with top of adjacent pavement, pathway, or finish grade after compaction. Provide a consistent smooth planting bed. Compact subgrade, Indianola fill and Groco fill at 85 percent maximum density. 3.02 PLANTING OPERATIONS A. POPLAR BIOMASS AREA: 1 . Poplar cuttings shall be soaked for 48 hours before planting. Stand cuttings upright in about 8 inches of water. 2. Planting will be accomplished using on-center spacing indicated on the drawings. 3. The cuttings shall be planted with buds pointing up and so that only two (2) buds are exposed above the ground line. B. DOUGLAS FIR DEMONSTRATION AREA: 1 . Handle seedlings carefully and as little as possible. l DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02480 - 6 LANDSCAPING 2. Keep seedlings cool (34 to 36 degrees F. ) . 3. Protect seedlings from sunlight and freezing tem- peratures. Keep roots covered; do not allow them to dry. 4. - At the planting site, store seedlings in natural shade. Do not cover with canvas to make shade. 5. Protect seedlings from water loss by reducing exposure to the drying air. Sprinkle with water occasionally if seedlings appear to be drying. 6. Use bags or boxes that have a vapor barrier to retain moisture during storage. Keep these containers sealed. _ 7. If seedlings are frozen when you receive them, thaw them slowly at 45-50 degrees F. for 3 to -4 days.• Do not place in direct sunlight. Do . _.:-.:. not plant. seedlings until completely thawed. • . 8. Dig a hole large enough to allow the root system to be planted straight without bending roots. 9. Plant the seedling about one inch deeper than the original soil line. Be sure no roo.ts. are exposed to the air. It is safer to plant too deep, than not deep enough. Ek 10. - Replace soil around the root system and pack firmly. Be sure there are-no air pockets. - 3.03 HYDROSEEDING Pr . A. GRASS MIX AREAS: :a:. The Douglas fir and Biomass Demonstration areas and the two Control ar- eas shall be hydroseeded. The areas shall be leveled and prepared for seeding as specified. Once the soil preparation is complete, the areas shall be P P P P � hydroseeded with the following materials: - Material • Spread Rate, lb./acre Grass seed 80 `�-'` Mulch 2,000 Tackifier 40 y. tlkli, DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02480 - 7 LANDSCAPING B. WILDFLOWER MIX AREAS: • All areas to receive Meadow Lawn Mix hydroseeding shall be prepared for seeding as specified. Once the soil preparation is complete, the areas shall be hydroseeded with the following materials: • Material • Spread Rate, lb./acre Meadow Lawn Mix seed 60 Mulch 2,000 Tackifier 3.04 MAINTENANCE • A. PRELIMINARY INSPECTION AND APPROVAL: The Contractor shall re quest a preliminary inspection of planting work Upon completion of all planting. ' Inspection and approval shall establish the beginning of the maintenanceperiod. No p of ptae al approvalsprd work Will be given. • artial B. MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS: • 1 . GENERAL. Maintenance shall be as specified below and shall continue for 30 calendar days minimum after all planting and hydroseeding • is completed and approved in accordance with specification 02480 - 3.04A. The maintenance period shall be extended where necessary to establish acceptable stands or thriving plants as specified. 2. HYDROSEED AREAS. • a. solid cover a achieved. The Contractor orshalled ereapas pplylhbdroseeding toe maintained uthos a where cover is not obtained or where washouts or incidental damage hash occurred. Reapplication shall be completed as specified in 02480 - 3.03. b. Constant moisture shall be maintained to a depth of 8 inches. c. The areas shall be kept free of undesirable weeds and grasses by the application of suitable selective weed killers or hand pulling. Watering, weeding, replanting, reseeding, mowing, rolling and top dressing, and other necessary operations shall be performed to establish an even, thick and vigorous stand of grass. f DIVISION 2` - SITEWORK SECTION 02480 - 8 LANDSCAPING d. Hydroseed grass areas shall be maintained through the second cutting, or for 30 days, whichever is longer. Grass shall not be cut shorter than 1-1/2 inches. e. Wildflower areas generally flower from May through September. After September, 'flower seeds begin to mature, dry, and fall to the ground for reseeding. Mowing should not occur until November, after seeds have matured. 3. TREES. a. For 30 calendar days after approval of the planting, trees shall be maintained in a vigorous, thriving condition by water- ing, cultivating, spraying, and other necessary operations. b. Trees shall be protected from damage by erosion or trespassing, and proper safeguards shall be:erected. c. Unhealthy, damaged or dead or dying trees shall be replaced promptly with materials as specified. Plants used for replacement shall be of the same kind and size as specified, planted and maintained as out- lined above. **END OF SECTION** DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02810 - 1 IRRIGATION SYSTEM PART 1 - GENERAL 1 .01 DESCRIPTION This section specifies labor, materials, equipment, and services to com- plete quick coupler systems. 1 .01 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. REFERENCES (U.C.) : This section references the latest revision of the following documents. They are a part of this section as specified and modified. In case of a conflict between the requirements of this section and those of the listed documents, the requirements of this section shall prevail. Reference Title ASTM A120 American Society for Testing and Materials li ASTM D1784 ASTM D2241 ASTM D1785 ASTM D2466 ASTM D2672 ASTM B3 1 .03 SUBMITTALS The following shall be submitted in accordance with Section 01300: A. PRODUCTS AND MATERIALS: 1 . Provide sufficient descriptive literature/information as to all operating characteristics including operating pressures, pressure losses, mate- rials used in product, test certificates, special features, etc. , for those products not specified by manufacturer or those submitted for approval as equal, prior to installation for approval of Construction Manager. Only the Construc- tion Manager can approve an item as "equal." Approval must be in writing. 2. Operating and maintenance information shall be submitted. The in- formation shall include guarantee/warranty certificates, operations and mainte- DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02810 - 2 IRRIGATION SYSTEM nance instructions, parts lists, and list of authorized distributors/service representatives. 3. At the time of final inspection of the completed installation, the Contractor shall have completed preparation of the "as-built" drawings (in- dicating all changes) ready to turn over to the Municipality for recording pur- poses; this shall be accomplished prior to .final payment. 1 .04 STORAGE Store all PVC materials under cover from direct sunlight until time of in- stallation. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 GENERAL All materials to be incorporated in this system shall be new and without flaws or defects and of quality and performance as specified and meeting the re- quirements of the system. All pipe damaged or rejected because of defects shall Ibe removed from the site at the time of said rejection by the Construction Man- lager. 2.02 PIPE AND FITTINGS A. GALVANIZED PIPE AND FITTINGS: Pipe standard weight Schedule 40, hot-dip galvanized threaded and coupled; ASTM A120. Fittings standardthreadedon or galvanize mal leable iron fittings, 150 psi. ed mal- i B. POLYVINYLCHLORIDE PIPE (PVC) AND FITTINGS: 1 . PVC PIPE AND FITTINGS: PVC compound Type ade 1 or Type 1 , Grade 2, conforming to ASTM D1784 specifications and approved rand certified by the National Sanitation Foundation, all fittings Class 160 unless otherwise noted. Each length of PVC pipe is to be marked with an identifying extrusion "run" number and the manufacturer's name or trade name, the pipe size, and schedule or class. 2. PVC SOLVENT WELD PIPE: PVC 1120 or PVC 1220 material; and shall have 200-psi minimum pressure rating unless otherwise indicated, with SDR 21 walls which conform to ASTM D2241 . PVC pipe with walls heavier than SDR 21 shall be installed when noted. 3. PVC THREADED PIPE: PVC 1120 or PVC 1220 material, Schedule 80, conforming to ASTM D1785. 111 . I I DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02810 - 3 11 - IRRIGATION SYSTEM 4. PLASTIC PIPE FITTINGS: Conform to ASTM D2466, Type 1 , Grade 1 or 2. Pipe may be belled on one end with the dimensions of the tapered bell con- forming to ASTM D2672. Molded fittings manufactured of the same material as the pipe, suitable for solvent weld, unless otherwise specified. Slip fitting I �I socket taper shall be so sized that a dry, unsoftened pipe end can be inserted no more than halfway into the socket. Plastic saddle and flange fittings not permitted. 11 5. SOLVENT WELD COMPOUND: Two-step application, with primer and solvent compounds. 2.03 VALVE BOXES AND PROTECTIVE SLEEVES A. GENERAL: j Enclose all Fogtite valves in load bearing valve boxes unless otherwise specified. B. VALVE BOXES: Shutoff valve: Fogtite 2 SL concrete meter box with slide lock top. C. PROTECTIVE SLEEVE WITH LOCKING CAPS/SLEEVES: Two-inch diameter, Class 160, PVC, length as required. Caps, Rainbird i 1163100. All drain valves and manual control valves to be enclosed in protective sleeves/locking caps unless otherwise indicated. 1 12.04 VALVE KEYS AND VALVE BOX COVER KEYS Provide 5 sets of all keys required for valves, valve box covers and pro- tective sleeve caps and locking covers unless otherwise specified. 2.05 VALVES A. QUICK COUPLING VALVE; All quick coupling valves shall be Rainbird non-potable quick coupling valves as specified in the manufacturer's catalog or equal. Valves shall be 44 "NP" with an overall height of 6 inches. The top pipe male threads shall be 1 inch, and the top pipe female threads, 3/4 inch. The quick coupling valve shall be designed for operation with a 44K key, a minimum of 3 to be supplied as a Y part of this contract. These are to be fitted with "SH-2" swivel hose ells. B. GATE VALVES: All gate valves shall be bronze for water, 200 psi WOG, and having IPS I threaded connection and screw-in bonnet. Gate valves shall be Aqua or equal. 1 1 DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02810 - 4 i . - IRRIGATION SYSTEM C. DRAIN VALVES: i A minimum of one drain valve per system or more if shown on the plan shall be provided to completely drain each system. Drain valves shall be 1/2 or 3/4 11 1 inch in size and shall be of bronze or brass, manual globe type, with rising stem, hex brass union, removable bonnet and stem, and adjustable packing gland. Valves shall be designed for underground installation with suitable cross wheel • j for operation with a standard key, and shall have a service rating of not less than 150 psi non-shock cold water. The Contractor shall furnish two standard op- erating keys. The installing contractor is responsible for locating one or more lidrain valves as needed on each system to completely drain each system. 2.06 DRAIN ROCK . 1 . • Unfractured rock; 100 percent passing 1-1/2-inch square sieve and 0 percent passing 3/4-inch square sieve. I 1 2.07 MAGNETIC PIPE LOCATING TAPE Magnetic pipe locating tape shall be Detect-A-Tape or approved equal, and shall be installed with all PVC pipe. 11 1 ' PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 INSPECTION A. DISCREPANCIES IN PLANS: II 1 Report to the Construction Manager any deviations between quick coupler t. 1 system drawings and the site. Failure to do so prior to the installation of equipment and resulting in replacing, and/or relocating equipment, shall be done at the Contractor's expense. i 1 B. AVAILABLE PRESSURE VERIFICATION: V Prior to the start of any work, verify static pressure at point of connec- tion. Notify.Construction Manager of pressure available for approval to pro- i ceed. I . I 3.02 PERFORMANCE . 11 I A. GENERAL: 1 - i Locations, size and type of all equipment as indicated. No adjustment ',b, shall be made without written approval of the Construction Manager. Water ser- ;-` ' . vice connections shall conform to the requirements set forth by the supplying : _ ' agency. . 1 r+:,_ lfir_ I ..l.di, DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02810 - 5 IRRIGATION SYSTEM B. LAYOUT OF QUICK COUPLER SYSTEM: Stake the quick coupler systems following the schematic design shown on the plans before the construction begins. It is understood that corrective measures in the system may become necessary but no changes or alterations in the system as planned shall be made without the prior authorization of the Construction Manager. C. TRENCHING: 1 . Trenches shall be excavated for all plastic or galvanized pipe to provide a minimum depth of cover below finish grade of 24 inches for live lines. No wider at any point than is necessary to lay the pipe or install equipment. Excavated with vertical sides and provided with bracing and shoring to be placed as required, straight and not have abrupt changes in grade. Locate outside of paved areas wherever possible. 1 2. Excavate to depth required in any material encountered with no extra compensation. Materials unsuitable for bedding of pipe .to be removed to a depth 4 inches below trench bottom and replaced with suitable bedding material as directed by the Construction Manager. I I 3. Suitable bedding material shall be excavated trench material free from material which might damage the pipe, including rocks, roots, sticks, de- bris, or other sharp objects over 1 inch in diameter, or sand as required. 4. Exercise care when excavating trenches near existing trees. 1 Where roots are 2 inches and greater in diameter, except in the direct path of the pipe, hand excavate and tunnel. When large roots are exposed, wrap with heavy burlap for protection and prevent excessive drying. 'Trenches dug by ma- chines adjacent to trees having roots 2 inches and less in diameter, shall have the sides hand trimmed making a clean cut of the roots. All roots 1/2-inch and greater in diameter that are cut and trimmed shall be treated with an approved tree wound dressing. Trenches having exposed tree roots shall be backfilled within 24 hours unless adequately protected by moist burlap or canvas. 5. The top t separate ofsubsoil and 6shall ebeo replaced laswthe top hen hlayer twhen hbackfillall b eis I ! made. D. PIPING: 1 . Drain valves to be installed at lowest end point of all mains and all other locations indicated. Install valves as per detail. Locate sumps out- side of paved areas, use offsets if necessary. System will be winterized by i compressed air blowout through quick coupler. I I • DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02810 - 6 1 IRRIGATION SYSTEM 1 2. Sleeves/conduits required for live lines (mains) under all paving and surfacing and as indicated to be Class 200 PVC, NSF twice the diameter of insert pipe unless otherwise noted. 1 3. Plastic pipe shall be installed in a manner so as to provide for 1 expansion and contraction as recommended by the manufacturer. E. JOINTING: 1 . GENERAL: a. All threaded joints (PVC or galvanized) shall be sealed with 1 Teflon tape or Rectorseal "Heavy Duty" #100 Virgin Teflon Thread sealing paste only (no substitutions) . Care shall be taken to not overtighten the metal pipe to PVC fittings. b. Keep interior of pipes clean and free from dirt, debris, ex - 1 cess solvent, pipe cuttings or burrs and ream to full diameter. Where pipe lay- ing is not in progress, close ends of pipe. • 2. PVC PIPE: Use 2-stepsolvent weld process only, apply as per manufacturer's recommendations. No water shall be permitted in pipe until a pe- riod of at least 10 hours has elapsed for solvent weld setting and curing. The ' joints shall be allowed to cure at least 24 hours before pressure is applied to 11 the system. Only factory threaded Schedule 80 PVC pipe may be connected to a threaded fitting without an adapter. No male PVC adapters permitted. Use only female PVC adapters galvanized steel pipe nipples (3 inches minimum length) . Street wells permitted only where indicated; "Marlex" Schedule 4A high-density 1 polyethylene (no substitutions) . F. GALVANIZED PIPE AND FITTING TREATMENT: 1 . Below Grade including portions of all galvanized risers to be painted with at least one coat of American Tar Company "Carbon Elastic Paint," 1 #2221 , or approved equal, to prevent acid corrosion. 2. Cast fittings need not be painted. Do not add any solvent to the paint. If the paint is too thick, heat without applying direct flame. Care should be taken to thoroughly paint all male threads. When painting is done be- fore assembly, the paint shall be touched up after assembly. Paint no 1 above-grade portions. G. INSTALLATION: 1 . GENERAL: See details for installation requirements. Provide suf- ficient clearance for materials requiring maintenance. Install all materials as ' per manufacturer's recommendations unless otherwise specified. All work shall conform to the Uniform Plumbing Code having jurisdiction. The Contractor shall obtain and pay for all permits having to do with the work. All scaled dimensions 1 DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02810 - 7 IRRIGATION SYSTEM are approximate. The Contractor shall check and verify all dimensions on the site before proceeding with any work as part of the contract. Before starting work on the quick coupler system, the Contractor shall carefully note all finish grades. Finish grades changed in the course of the work shall be restored to the original grade contours. 2. QUICK COUPLER: Risers for all quick coupler valves shall be as detailed. Minimum riser size shall be the iron pipe size of the quick coupler. All quick-coupling valves shall be set perpendicular to finished grades unless otherwise shown or_ specified. 3. VALVES: Enclose all valves in valve boxes except manual or drain valves which are to be enclosed in protective sleeves with locking caps. Valve box extension may be required. Install as per detail and locate precisely by 1 dimensions on as-built drawings. Valve bonnet packings and bolts shall be checked and tightened before backfill. H. EXCAVATION: • Existing sprinkler irrigation pipes may be encountered within the work limit line on drawing.G5 and are to be capped with prior approval of the Con- struction Manager at approved locations, and the remainder of the pipe is to be abandoned in place. I. FLUSHING AND TESTING: 1 . All main supply lines shall be flushed completely of foreign par- ticles before installing quick-coupler valves. All main supply lines shall be hydrostatically tested at 150 psig static pressure with valves closed. Test pressure is to be applied for a period of not less than 30 minutes with a pres- sure loss of not more than 5 psig. All air shall be vented from the system dur- ing filling and prior to application of test pressure. 2. After installation, the piping shall be completely flushed of Iforeign particles before attaching drain valves. After flushing, lines shall be tested at 150 psig with risers capped and drain valves closed. Any pipe, fitting or joint showing leaks shall be separated, cleaned and remade. Test pressure is to be applied for a period of not less than 30 minutes with a pressure loss of not more than 5 psig. 3. All piping shall be completely flushed, capped and tested before installing valve. Lines shall be tested (operated) for minimum periods of one hour at operating line pressures with drain valves closed. During and after the test periods, the installations shall be inspected for leaks and any such found shall be corrected by the Contractor and the lines retested. 4. These same testing procedures shall be used, at the discretion of the Construction Manager, to test all mainlines following the repair of any break or disruption of service of the system throughout the life of the con- A DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02810 - 8 IRRIGATION SYSTEM tract. Also, following any such break and prior to re-testing, the affected por- tions of the system shall be flushed with all valves removed. 5. ' All gauges used in the testing of water pressures shall be certi- fied correct by an independent testing laboratory immediately prior to use on the project. Gauges shall be retested when directed by the Construction Manager. J. BACKFILL: 1 . At Contractor's option, the pipe may be partially backfilled as it is laid, but all joints and appurtenances shall remain exposed for flushing, pressure testing, preliminary inspection, approval and as-built location. Com- plete backfill after completion of preliminary inspection of system, cover all but valve boxes. 2. Backfill when PVC pipe is not in an expanded condition due to heat or pressure. Cooling of the pipe can be accomplished by operating the sys- tem a short time before backfill or by backfilling in the early part of the morning, before the heat of the day. 3. In refilling the trenches, the fill around 6 inches above the pipe and fittings shall be suitable bedding material as defined in Section 02200, or sand as required and tamped. The remainder of the backfill shall con- tain lumps or rocks no larger than 2 inches. The top 6 inches of backfill shall be replaced topsoil where such exists (free from rocks over 1 inch, subsoil, or trash or selected fill dirt or sand if soil conditions are rocky) . Trenches shall be thoroughly water-settled. No sluicing will be permitted. Trenches shall be backfilled uniform flush with the surrounding grade, raked and rolled with a 260-pound roller. 4. All roots, rocks, and surplus excavation shall be removed from the site unless otherwise directed. 5. Trenches or tunnels under roads or paved areas shall be backfilled and tamped with a mechanical tamper in successive 6-inch maximum lifts. K. CLEANUP: Keep the premises free from rubbish and debris at all times and arrange ma- terial so as not to interfere with other operations on the job site. Remove all unused material, rubbish, and debris from the site. 3.03 INSPECTIONS AND TESTING A. GENERAL: 1 . To be valid, all tests must be performed under the direction of the Construction Manager. The Contractor must give 72 hours notice to the Con- DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02810 - 9 IRRIGATION SYSTEM struction Manager when inspection is desired. The location, inspection, and testing provisions for these specifications will be strictly adhered to. If, for any reason, any part of the quick coupler system is backfilled before loca- tion, testing, or inspection, it must be completely uncovered and exposed until approved for backfilling by the Construction Manager. 2. The Construction Manager reserves the right to direct the removal and replacement of any items which, in its opinion, do not present an orderly, reasonably neat or workmanlike appearance, provided such items can be properly installed in such an orderly way by the usual methods in such work. Such re- moval and replacement shall be done, when directed in writing, at the Contractor's expense without additional cost to the Municipality. 3. All gauges used in the testing of water pressures shall be certi- fied correct by an independent testing laboratory immediately prior to use on the project. Gauges shall be retested when directed by the Construction Man- ager, at no additional cost. B. PRELIMINARY INSPECTION/PRESSURE TESTING: 1 . Prior to request for preliminary inspection or arrival of Con- struction Manager, accomplish the following: a. Prior to requesting inspections, Contractor shall conduct a preliminary test and make any adjustments required. Request tests for mains only after all mains have been installed and tested. b. All pipe and valves (including drain valves and quick cou- plers) and all other equipment in place. c. Cap all risers except one on each quick coupler system. d. Purge all air from main lines. 2. Test of mains and valves as follows: With all valves in place and closed, test at 150 psi minimum for 30 minutes without introduction of ad- ditional service or pumping pressure. Testing shall be done with 1 pressure gauge installed on the line where directed by the Construction manager. Lines which show loss of pressure exceeding 5 psi at the end of specified test periods '' ` shall be rejected. The Contractor shall correct installations rejected and retesting will be performed as specified herein. 3. Test of laterals as follows: Purge all air from laterals and cap all risers. Open valves and bring system to line pressure. Lateral lines will be inspected visually. Lines which evidence visible leakage shall be re- jected. . 11 4. Rejected systems: Rejected systems or portions of systems re- quire repair and retesting in manner specified. II • DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02810 - 10 11 IRRIGATION SYSTEM • i C. FINAL INSPECTION: Prior to request for final inspection or arrival of Construction Manager, complete all work. Backfill all except valve boxes. 3.04 SYSTEMS OPERATION ORIENTATION At time of, and as part of, the final inspection, conduct a training and , orientation session for the Municipality and building manager, covering the op- eration and maintenance of the quick coupler system: The "as-built" plans shall be reviewed and all features explained. • PART 4 - GUARANTEE • The satisfactory operation of equipment, materials, and workmanship includ- ing restoration of the area shall. be guaranteed for a period of. 1 year from the date of acceptance. Repair or replace any defect in equipment or workmanship occurring within that year at Contractor's •expense. • **END OF SECTION** 1 • • • I DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02999 - 1 MISC. SITE WORK PART 1 - GENERAL 1 .01 DESCRIPTION . This section specifies construction of gravel paths with wood edging, in- stallation of site furnishings including trash receptacles, benches and boundary markers. 1 .02 QUALITY CONTROL This section references the latest revisions of the following documents. They are a part of this section as specified and modified. In case of conflict. between the requirements of this section and those of the listed' documents, the requirements of this section shall prevail. Reference - Title ASTM A90 Tests for Weight of Coating on Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) Iron or Steel ASTM A120 Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) Welded and Seamless, for Ordinary Uses ASTM A153-- --- ' Zinc Coating (Hot-Dip) on Iron and Steel Hardware ASTM C150-84 Portland Cement ASTM D1557 Methods of Test for Moisture-Density Relations of Soils, Using 10 lb. (4.5 kg) Rammer and 18-In. (457 mm) Drop 11 AWPA C14-79 Wood for Highway Construction - Preservative Treatment Pressure Processes FF-N-105A Federal Specification WCLB No. 16 Standard Grading and Dressing Rules for Douglas Fir, Western Hemlock, Western Red Cedar, White Fir, Sitka Spruce Lumber (Sept. ' 1970, Rev. Jan. 1979) 1 .03 SUBMITTALS TO BE PROVIDED • In accordance with Section 0.1300, manufacturer's product information desig- nating specific materials provided shall be submitted. DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02999 - 2 MISC. SITE WORK PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 MATERIALS A. CRUSHED ROCK: Crushed rock shall be a select granular material, free from organic matter and of such size and gradation that the specified compaction can be readily at- tained. Material shall have a sand equivalent value of not less than 20 and shall conform to the following gradation: U.S. Standard Percent by Weight Passing 5/8 inch 100 11 1/4 inch 55-75 No. 40 8-24 No. 200 0-10 11 Crushed rock shall be composed of hard, durable, sound pieces having a spe- cific gravity of not less than 2.65. B. LUMBER: Lumber shall be manufactured, graded and grade-marked in compliance with 11 the following reference specifications and grading rules. Douglas fir shall be graded in compliance with one of the following: 1 . "Standard Grading and Dressing Rules No. 16 for Douglas Fir, West Coast Hemlock, Sitka Spruce, Western Red Cedar," issued by the West Coast Lumber Inspection Bureau. 2. "1970 Grading Rules," issued by the Western Wood Products Asso • ciation, Portland, Oregon. 3. All lumber shall be pressure-treated with preservative, complying with AWPA C14-79 and as specified on the drawings. C. NAILS: Sizes and types. of nails shall be as indicated, or required for the pur- ' pose. They shall comply with FEDSPEC FF-N-105A. D. CONCRETE FOOTINGS: Concrete footings shall be 2,500 psi, 5 sack mix. Concrete shall be pro- vided in accordance with the following: DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02999 - 3 MISC. SITE WORK Minimum Combined Max. Coarse •Concrete Aggregate Cement Content, Class Class Aggregate Sacks/Cu. Yd. Size. Inch Concrete C-2 C 3/4-inch • 5 E. BOUNDARY MARKERS: 1 . Pipe used shall. be ASTM A120, Schedule 40 steel pipe. Post shall be hot-dip galvanized1. of zinc per ASTM A120. Galvanizing shall apply at least 2.0 ounces • per square foot of surface. Pipe ;' weighing 5.79 pounds shall be 2-7/8-inch outside diameter, per foot. il 2 coat- ing least. Pole caps pseshallzbe hot-dip galvanized steel with a minimum coat- [ ingM ofA at3. per square foot of surface in accordance with AST _ j. F. TRASH RECEPTACLE: . k Trash receptacles shall be Forms & Surfaces, metal litter receptacle, No. i. AE 2075. Litter receptacle shall be 32 inches high and 16 inches in diameter with a bolts on metal support to be set in concrete. G. BENCH: • i . :..' Benches shall be Forms & Surfaces, Grate Bench, No. AE 6001 with Half Round Concrete Bench Ends, No. AE 6011 . Benches shall be 16 inches high, 72 inches wide and 18 inches deep. Metal finish shall be a thermoset polyester coating colored black. Bench ends shall be made of. natural cement and fine te reinforced with steel wire mesh with ex osed aggregates P aggregate finish. PART 3 - EXECUTION ii 3.01 SITE GRADING AND SOIL PREPARATION f1 A. GRAVEL PATH: • 1 . The Contractor shall : ' • below the top of cent finish prep are a consistent subgrade 5-1/2-inches . density. grade. Compact subgrade at 95 percent maximum " " 2. Prior to installing edging the subgrade shall be treated with ,• . dium Chlorate Borate, .Casoronfi rate of application. or Amitrole, at the manufacturer's recommendedSo- 3.02 SITE FURNISHINGS % �:: it'. , . r :./ I . 0 DIVISION 2 - SITEWORK SECTION 02999 - 4 MISC. SITE WORK 0 ' A. CONCRETE FOOTING: 0 ' 1 . Concrete footing for the trash receptacles shall be constructed prior to placing gravel path fill. 11 2. Construct concrete footings as shown on plans at locations noted. f Footings shall include setting metal anchor mounts. Slope top of footings to en- sure positive drainage. 0 B. TRASH RECEPTACLE: Trash receptacles shall be bolted to metal anchor mounts after completion • of the path surfacing. C. BENCHES: Benches shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instruc- tions after completion of the path surfacing. 3.03 GRAVEL PATH • /1 A. WOOD HEADERBOARD: Wood headerboards and stakes shall be constructed in locations shown on the 11 drawings. !�q a B. PATH SURFACING: i II1 . The Contractor shall backfill 1-1/2-inches with select fill mate- rial along the length of the path. Subgrade shall be tamped level, and compacted at 95 percent maximum density. 2. Four inches of compacted depth of crushed rock shall be supplied. Crushed rock shall be screened level, tamped and screened level again. !I 3.04 BOUNDARY MARKERS Boundary markers shall be located and installed as shown on the drawings. Concrete footing shall be at least one inch above grade and sloped for drainage. Posts shall be set vertical and shall be accurately aligned. Rainproof malleable :: iron caps shall be fitted on the posts. **END OF SECTION** Y .. CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWISlERS/SITE PLAN • " r "FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY" " " PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: APPLICATION NUMBER: The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code. Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. NAME ASSESSOR'S ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER 1 Container Corporation of America 1st National Plaza 242304-9008 Chicago, IL 60670 Schober Enterprises, Inc. 1800 Monster Road 242304-9067 Renton, WA 98055 Charles Moore P.O. Box 1149 242304-9094 9083 _ Charles B.. Guy 3101 Southeast 5th 242304-9064 Renton, WA 98055 9061 M & M Properties P.O. Box 1778 242304-9066 Kent, WA 98032 Burlington Northern, Inc. 810 Third Avenue 242304-9099 Seattle, WA 98104 132304-9009 9084 L.M. Brown & D.A. Moody 13975 Interurban Avenue S. 242304-9053 Seattle, WA 98168 Manufacturers Mineral 1215 Monster Road Southwest 242304-9106 Renton, WA 98055. 9075 First City Equities 800 - 5th Avenue, Suite 4040 918800-0130 Seattle, WA 98104 0140 I - \ . . I II ; I r7:.,: illir.::::G_ill;" e1 1 l \", -71:1447:41:_ - / a,� ` ��' ?y z D Rh • ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • \E .....W/ 1 :vG PUBUG ,� a , ti 8, 19:g ®a CERTIFICATION I, drieri; hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in a d for the State of Washington residing at on the r day of G0,f.e..a(,:f: • // SIGNED: Uor-L offaNtou-i440%-xf44/7/ CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I. . hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on . to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a , Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at on the day of SIGNED: FORM 208