HomeMy WebLinkAboutJ_CUP_Justification_180124_v1
1
Puget Sound Energy - Energize Eastside Conditional
Use Permit
Project Summary & Justification – Renton Segment
Project Summary
Puget Sound Energy, Inc. (“PSE”) proposes to upgrade approximately 4 miles of existing 115 kV
transmission lines (two) in the city of Renton (“City” or “Renton”) with two 230 kV transmission lines
(“Project”) (see maps 1 and 2). The Project is part of the Energize Eastside project, which involves the
construction of a new substation in the city of Bellevue (“Bellevue”) and upgrades to an additional 14
miles of transmission lines in the cities of Bellevue, Redmond, Newcastle, and unincorporated King
County. The new substation and upgraded transmission lines are needed to address electrical system
deficiencies identified during federally-required planning studies. Combined with aggressive
conservation, the Energize Eastside project significantly improves reliability for Eastside communities,
including the City, and will supply the additional electrical capacity needed for current and anticipated
growth.
The existing electrical system is not robust enough to maintain reliable service if the entire 18-mile
facility is taken out of service at one time. Therefore, the Energize Eastside project will be constructed in
two phases. This will allow PSE to keep the existing 115 kV facilities partially in service during
construction, which will ensure the continuation of reliable service to customers. This approach best
allows PSE to continue to deliver reliable electricity to PSE’s customers during construction. This
Conditional Use Permit (“CUP”) application proposes the construction of a 4-mile segment in the City as
part of PSE’s first phase of construction. The Project’s second phase will be permitted and constructed
outside of Renton’s city limits at a later date. PSE’s first phase includes the following components:
• Within Renton, approximately 4 miles of existing 115 kV lines (two) will be upgraded with two
230 kV lines beginning at the City’s northern boundary with Newcastle and ending at the
existing Talbot Hill substation. The upgrade is located entirely within PSE’s existing 100-ft
electrical transmission utility corridor. Upgrading requires replacing approximately 144 existing
wood and steel poles (H-frame designs) with approximately 41 steel monopoles of either single-
circuit or double-circuit design. Within the Talbot Hill substation, additional breakers and
associated controls will be added to accommodate the new lines.
• Outside Renton, the first phase will include construction of the Richards Creek 230 kV to 115 kV
substation in Bellevue and upgrading an additional approximately 5 miles of the two existing
115 kV lines with two 230 kV lines between the new Richard Creek substation and the northern
city boundary of Renton in the cities of Bellevue and Newcastle.
The Project site is currently occupied by PSE’s existing 115 kV transmission lines. After deliberate review
and extensive stakeholder input, PSE proposes to undertake this Project in PSE’s existing 100-ft
easement that was established in the late 1920s and early 1930s rather than siting a new corridor
2
through Renton communities. The existing transmission lines are co-located with Olympic Pipeline (OPL)
petroleum pipelines for about 0.2 miles at the north end of the Project before the pipelines divert from
the Project corridor and follow the Seattle City Light (SCL) 230 kV utility corridor, as well as 0.6 miles at
the south end of the Project near Talbot Hill substation. Within the existing utility corridor, upgraded
pole locations will generally be in the same locations as the existing poles. Use of the existing corridor
minimizes environmental impacts and impacts to adjacent uses to the fullest extent feasible. The
current uses adjacent to the corridor have developed over time as areas in the City became more dense
and populated. The utility corridor is part of the existing character of these areas and crosses 42 parcels
(see pre-application file No. PRE 17-000362 for parcel numbers).
Renton is a partner city engaged in evaluating the Project under the State Environmental Policy Act
(“SEPA”). In conjunction with the cities of Bellevue, Redmond, Kirkland, and Newcastle, the City
published a Phase 1 and a Phase 2 Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). These documents can
be found online at http://www.energizeeastsideeis.org/. The Phase 1 DEIS contained a programmatic
review of project alternatives. See Phase 1 DEIS, Ch. 2. A thorough analysis of all project alternatives
relative to defined project objectives (e.g., meeting demand growth and being environmentally
acceptable to affected cities), resulted in a narrowing of reasonable alternatives to an overhead
transmission solution. The Phase 2 DEIS contains a focused review of overhead transmission line route
alternatives and impacts. Within Renton, PSE’s preferred route uses the existing transmission line
corridor as this route is the least impactful (particularly because it minimizes new environmental
impacts that would result from a new or expanded corridor). PSE has supported public involvement in
the SEPA process through notifications supplementing the official SEPA announcements and will
continued to do so through the Final EIS, schedule for completion and publication in early 2018.
Upgrading the transmission lines will involve removing existing poles and installing new poles by direct
embedding or placing them on foundations. During design, PSE has worked to locate the upgraded poles
near existing accessible routes to minimize construction traffic impacts. Vehicular access to pole
replacement sites will be made from these existing roads and will utilize existing or constructed
temporary access roads. Pole installation typically requires 3–7 days for each pole (within an
approximately 2-month work window at any one pole location) and additional time is required for
stringing wire (typically 1 to 2 days). Access to adjacent land uses will be maintained. PSE will work to
maintain access to roads and recreation sites while providing a safe working area for crews and the
public. The existing transmission corridor will not require any new permanent access. Construction job
shacks will be located by the contractor selected for the Project, but are typically placed in close
proximity to the Project and away from sensitive areas. No off-site improvements are proposed in
Renton.
Multiple critical areas are mapped along the Project corridor including: wetlands, steep slopes, coal
mine hazards, landslide hazards, streams, and wellhead protection areas (also see Renton Critical Areas
Report (“Renton CAR”), Chapter 4). The Project includes replacement of aerial wire across the Cedar
River (shoreline per Renton Municipal Code [RMC] 4-3-090.B.2). The Project proposes the replacement
3
of poles outside of jurisdictional shorelines and the aerial wire crossing does not require any
disturbances in the shoreline.
Selective tree removal will occur within the managed utility corridor easement, except within the Cedar
River shoreline jurisdiction, to meet federal vegetation management requirements and PSE standards,
which generally require removal of trees located in the wire zone that have a mature height of more
than 15 feet. An estimated 339 trees could be removed of which 238 are significant trees and 57 are
located in stream or wetland buffers. It is anticipated that vegetation removal or management will occur
adjacent to streams and wetlands in the project corridor. Where possible, efforts will be made to
minimize work activities in or adjacent to critical areas (see also, the Renton CAR) provided under
separate cover and the City of Renton Tree Inventory Report: Puget Sound Energy – Energize Eastside
Project (The Watershed Company 2016b).). To mitigate for the loss of significant trees in the
transmission corridor, PSE is proposing mitigation ratios that exceed the City’s regulatory standards. PSE
has been meeting with property owners along the existing corridor to discuss tree replacement and will
continue to work together to develop property-specific landscaping and tree replacement plans. It is
anticipated that a number of trees cannot be replaced onsite due to property owners’ preferences. In
those cases, replacement trees will need to be planted elsewhere. PSE will work with the City to identify
other offsite areas that would benefit from these trees, including in locations outside of the managed
utility corridor and/or will participate in the City’s fee in lieu program. RMC 4-4-130.H.1.e.iii. One benefit
of offsite planting is the option to plant larger trees in clusters that will contribute to increasing habitat
quality and area aesthetics. Offsite options may include city parks and neighborhood groups/HOAs.
Surface soils in the Project area include mainly silty gravel, silty sand, and silt. Soils along the proposed
route provide adequate support for the new poles (GeoEngineers 2017; see Appendix C of Critical Areas
Report). To minimize impacts to soil, a Sediment and Erosion Control Plan will be addressed in the
Project-specific Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (or “TESC”) Plan and Construction Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (CSWPPP). Areas of disturbance will be limited to the minimum necessary
within geological hazard areas, including limiting equipment access. See Renton CAR at Sections 4.3.5;
5.2.2; 7.1.2; and 8.3. All disturbed areas will be restored. Drainage patterns will not be changed as a
result of the Project; more information will be provided in the Drainage Report to be submitted to the
City along with a future clearing and grading permit application. The Project will entail removing 144
poles and installing 41 new ones. The installation of the new poles will require approximately 450 to
650 cubic yards of excavation. The annulus between the outside of the hole and the pole is typically
backfilled with crushed rock.
The property is located within multiple zoning designations, including: Commercial Arterial (CA),
Commercial Office Residential (COR), Center Village (CV), Light Industrial (IL), Residential-1 (R-1),
Residential-10 (R-10), Residential-14 (R-14), Residential-4 (R-4), Residential-6 (R-6), Residential-8 (R-8),
Resource Conservation (RC), and Residential Multi-Family (RM-F) (Renton Zoning Maps 2015). The
Project is considered a “Utility, Large” land use per RMC 4-11-210A, which is permitted within all zoning
designations as a Hearing Examiner-issued CUP. See RMC 4-2-060; RMC 4-8-070(H)(1)(d). Although
there are already two existing 115 kV transmission lines in the utility corridor, Renton considers the
Project an intensification of utility use; therefore, a CUP is required by the City. See RMC 4-9-030. The
4
Project is located in Township 23N, Range 05E, and Sections 4, 9, 16, 20, and 21. Total cost of
construction for Project in Renton is estimated to be about $18 million.
Conditional Use Permit Justification:
Consistency with Plans and Regulations: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general
purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and any other
plans, programs, maps or ordinances of the City of Renton.
Response: The proposed transmission line replacement and substation construction are
consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan (‘Plan) adopted June 22, 2015. Details of
consistency are provided in the table below. The City’s vision in the Plan is for a thriving,
opportunity-rich community. The Plan was developed in conformance with the state Growth
Management Act (GMA), King County’s Countywide Planning Policies, and Vision 2040.
PSE has a statutory duty to provide safe and reliable power at a reasonable cost. See RCW
80.28.010(2). The Energize Eastside project is an electrical infrastructure project needed to
bring a 230-kV power source to the Eastside region, including Renton, facilitating the City’s
vision by providing electrical resources that will support new residential and commercial
facilities contributing to the health of the community. The proposed Project is reviewed below
for compatibility with the Plan.
Table 1 – Renton Comprehensive Plan policies and compliance consistency review
Comprehensive Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Review
Land Use Element
L-B: Continue to build Renton’s Regional Growth Center
consistent with VISION 2040 to provide compact,
pedestrian-oriented, mixed-use development to meet the
demands of population and employment growth, while
reducing the transportation-related and environmental
impacts of growth.
Response: Renton is planning for a projected
growth of over 14,000 new households and
28,000 new employees by 2035. Without
adequate electricity to service the new
population and employment growth, these
goals cannot be achieved.
PSE has determined that a deficiency in
electrical transmission capacity during peak
periods could develop on the Eastside as
early as the winter of 2017-2018, with the
potential for corrective action plans including
load shedding (forced power outages) as
early as the summer of 2018.
Five separate studies performed by four
separate parties have confirmed the need to
address Eastside transmission capacity:
Electrical Reliability Study by Exponent, 2012
(City of Bellevue); Eastside Needs Assessment
Report by Quanta Services, 2013 (PSE);
Supplemental Eastside Needs Assessment
5
Report by Quanta Services, 2015 (PSE);
Independent Technical Analysis by Utility
Systems Efficiencies, Inc., 2015 (City of
Bellevue); and Review Memo by Stantec
Consulting Services Inc., 2015 (EIS
consultant). These are provided with the CUP
application.
The deficiency in the transmission capacity
on the Eastside is based on a number of
factors. Key factors include growing
population and employment in the Eastside
(including significant projected growth in
Renton), changing power consumption
patterns, and changing utility regulations that
require a higher standard of reliability. PSE
has concluded that the most effective and
efficient solution to meet the need objectives
is to site a new 230 kV transformer at a
central location on the Eastside (Bellevue)
that will be fed from the Sammamish
substation in Redmond from the north and
the Talbot Hill substation in Renton from the
south.
A lack of reliable power service would
adversely affect Renton’s ability to attract
and retain businesses and residents. As such,
Project implementation supports the needs
of Renton’s residents and businesses both
now and with projected future growth.
L-2: Support compact urban development to improve
health outcomes, support transit use, maximize land use
efficiency, and maximize public investment in
infrastructure and services.
Response: The Energize Eastside project is an
important investment in the infrastructure
needed to support Renton’s planned and
projected growth. As stated above, five
studies have confirmed that the Energize
Eastside project is needed to address near-
term system reliability deficiencies. By
maintaining a reliable electricity grid, the
proposed transmission line will support
Renton’s efforts to grow its business and
residential communities.
L-J: Develop well-balanced, attractive, convenient
Centers serving the City and the region that create
investment opportunities in urban scale development,
promote housing close to employment and commercial
areas, reduce dependency on automobiles, maximize
public investment in infrastructure and services, and
Response: The Energize Eastside project is an
important investment in the infrastructure
needed to support Renton’s planned and
projected growth. As stated above, five
studies have confirmed that the Energize
Eastside project is needed to address near-
6
promote healthy communities. term system reliability deficiencies. By
maintaining a reliable electricity grid, the
proposed transmission line will support
Renton’s efforts to grow its business and
residential communities.
L-P: Minimize adverse impacts to natural systems, and
address impacts of past practice where feasible, through
leadership, policy, regulation, and regional coordination.
Response: The Project’s impact to natural
systems and PSE’s related minimization and
mitigation efforts are detailed in the Renton
CAR. PSE’s decision to use the existing
transmission line corridor avoids new adverse
impacts to natural systems. PSE has worked
hard to identify pole placement locations and
adjust transmission pole height to minimize
adverse impacts to natural systems, including
impacts to aesthetic resources. PSE is also
committed to implementing Best
Management Practices (“BMPs”) to limit any
unavoidable impacts. See Renton CAR.
However, not all Project impacts can be
avoided. Strict federal clearance
requirements must be met with the upgrade
from a 115 kV transmission corridor to a 230
kV transmission corridor, resulting in
additional vegetation management within
the existing corridor. Federal standards
require PSE to maintain safe clearances
between vegetation and utility lines. These
standards are designed to maintain a reliable
electric transmission system by using a
defensive strategy that minimizes vegetation
encroachment into the lines to prevent risks
of vegetation-related outages. The upgraded
transmission lines will comply with PSE’s 230
kV vegetation management standards (based
on the federal standards), which generally
require removal of trees located in the wire
zone that have an expected mature height of
more than 15 feet. Taller trees within the
transmission easement may also be affected
depending on tree species, tree health,
distance from the wires or poles, and
topography.
Additionally, the co-located OPL easement is
maintained to prevent trees and other woody
vegetation from growing and interfering with
the pipelines. For these reasons, selective
7
tree canopy will be removed as part of the
transmission line upgrade.
To mitigate for loss of significant trees
(defined per RMC 4-4-130) in the
transmission corridor, PSE is proposing
mitigation that meets or exceeds the City’s
regulatory requirements. PSE will work with
individual property owners to replace trees
on private property. Where individual
property owners decline to have new trees
planted onsite, PSE will work with Renton to
place additional trees offsite or will
participate in the City’s fee in lieu program.
RMC 4-4-130.H.1.e.iii.
PSE has been meeting with property owners
along the existing corridor to discuss tree
replacement and will continue to work
together to develop property-specific
landscaping and tree replacement plans. It is
anticipated that a number of trees cannot be
replaced onsite due to property owners’
preferences. In those cases, replacement
trees will need to be planted outside the
corridor or be compensated for under the
City’s fee in lieu program. RMC 4-4-
130.H.1.e.iii. One benefit of offsite planting is
the option to plant trees with larger mature
size than is allowed within the utility corridor,
which larger mature trees will contribute to
habitat quality and area aesthetics. PSE will
work with Renton to determine whether
offsite planting is permissible and, if so, to
identify areas that would benefit from new
trees.
L-24: Promote urban forests through tree planting
programs, tree maintenance programs that favor the use
of large healthy trees along streets and in parks,
residential, commercial, and industrial areas, programs
that increase education and awareness, and through the
protection and restoration of forest ecosystems.
Response: See response to L-P above.
Although not required to replace those trees
that are removed, PSE will work with City and
property owners to identify opportunities to
replace those trees.
L-35: Ensure buildings, roads, and other features are
located on less sensitive portions of a site when sensitive
areas are present.
Response: RMC 4-11-190 defines “sensitive
areas” as “critical areas.” Critical areas
include “Wetlands, aquifer protection areas,
fish and wildlife habitat, frequently flooded
and geologically hazardous areas as defined
by the Growth Management Act” and are
8
subject to RMC 4-3-050, Critical Area
Regulations. See also RMC 4-11-030. As set
forth PSE’s Renton CAR, the Project avoids
critical areas to the extent feasible and
provides mitigation where impacts are
unavoidable.
In the Renton CAR the Project’s impacts are
summarized as follows:
“Proposed new poles have been sited to
avoid any direct impacts to wetlands or
streams. All impacts have been avoided
within the shoreline jurisdiction including
within all flood hazard areas. Completely
avoiding pole impacts to geologic hazard
areas and wellhead protection areas is not
feasible due to the prevalence of those
features in the Project area. Furthermore,
pole replacement activities associated with
the transmission line upgrade must occur in
specific locations for proper functioning of
the electrical system due to complex
engineering considerations making pole
placement in some critical areas unavoidable.
Where avoidance wasn’t possible, PSE
worked with engineers to minimize impacts
through design revisions; such changes
reduced pole footprints and increased line
heights to avoid critical area impacts to the
extent feasible.
Temporary impact areas associated with
construction access, pole construction work
areas, and stringing sites also avoid critical
areas to the extent feasible. For example,
specific pole construction work areas have
been adjusted to exclude critical areas on a
pole-by-pole basis.”
Renton CAR at 34.
The Renton CAR summarizes the Project’s
impacts, following implementation of
avoidance measures, as follows:
“The Project was designed to avoid and
minimize impacts to critical areas. No new
9
poles are proposed in wetlands, streams or
stream buffers or seismic hazard areas. One
new pole is proposed in a wetland buffer and
three existing Lake Tradition Line poles in
wetland buffer will be replaced with new,
larger poles in the same locations, resulting in
a net increase in pole footprint at those
locations. New poles are also proposed in
erosion hazard areas, landslide hazard areas,
steep slope hazard areas, coal mine hazard
areas, habitat conservation areas and
wellhead protection areas. Vegetation
conversion impacts are also proposed in
these areas, as well as in stream and wetland
buffers.
In wetland buffers, permanent impacts (i.e.,
poles) are limited to one new Energize
Eastside pole and three Lake Tradition
replacement poles. Two existing poles will be
removed from and replaced outside of
wetland and stream buffer resulting in a net
increase of 68 square feet of permanent
impact. Vegetation community conversion
impacts in wetland and stream buffers total
18,786 square feet and 20,064 square feet of
temporary disturbance will occur. Impacts
will be minimized by utilizing the existing
transmission line corridor, limiting
disturbance and implementing best
management practices (BMPs) when working
in critical areas, and installing transmission
lines between poles with minimal site
disturbance.”
Renton CAR at 1-2; see also Renton CAR at 27
(“The Project has been designed to avoid all
impacts within shoreline jurisdiction.
Conservatively, this includes avoiding all tree
removal and impacts to other native
vegetation within the vicinity of Wetland
NRO2 as well as the approximated
boundaries of the Cedar North wetland which
defines the northern extent of the shoreline
jurisdiction boundary.”). Unavoidable
impacts are described in detail in the Renton
CAR, Ch. 7.
L-55: Protect public scenic views and public view Response: The Project is permitted as a
10
corridors, including Renton’s physical, visual and
perceptual linkages to Lake Washington and the Cedar
River.
L-56: Natural forms, vegetation, distinctive stands of
trees, natural slopes, and scenic areas that “contribute to
the City’s identity, preserve property values, and visually
define the community neighborhoods” should be
protected.
conditional use in all zones in Renton.
The Phase 2 Draft Environmental Impact
Statement identified the following visual
resources in Renton: views of the Olympics,
Cascades and, near Talbot Hill, views of
Mount Rainier, Lake Washington, and the
Cedar River. Phase 2 DEIS at 3.2-16. Two
viewpoints in Renton (one at 1026 Monroe
Ave NE and one at 318 Glennwood Court SE)
were selected for review in the visual quality
analysis. These areas were characterized as
“surrounded by institutional and single-family
residences” and “surrounded by single-family
residential development and placed on a
ridge” respectively. Phase 2 DEIS at 3.2-21.
The Phase 2 DEIS concludes that “[i]mpacts to
scenic views would also be less-than-
significant because the degree of additional
obstruction would be minimal compared with
existing conditions.” Phase 2 DEIS at 3.2-81.
By using the existing utility corridor, PSE
protects existing public scenic views and
public view corridors as the impacted areas
already include transmission lines in the
viewshed. This includes the Cedar River
recreation area, in which PSE was able to
avoid any tree removal or construction
activities within the jurisdictional shoreline,
thereby protecting the heavily vegetated
ravine.
Constructing the Project in the existing
transmission line corridor, in roughly the
same location as the existing poles, also
protects new disturbances to trees, natural
slopes and scenic areas. After a pole-by-pole
review, PSE concluded that a maximum of
339 trees will be removed, 238 of which are
designated as significant trees. Tree
inventory methodology and results are
available in the City of Renton Tree Inventory
Report: Puget Sound Energy – Energize
Eastside Project (The Watershed Company
2016b). PSE will work with the City and
property owners to identify preferred species
of replacement vegetation that enhances
adjacent uses to the extent possible. PSE has
11
been meeting with property owners along
the existing corridor to discuss tree
replacement and will continue to work
together to develop property-specific
landscaping and tree replacement plans. This
mitigation will help to ensure that Renton’s
view corridors retain trees and vegetation.
The Phase II DEIS also concludes that
constructing the Project in the existing
corridor limits impacts to property values to a
“less than significant” level. DEIS at Section
3-10.
L-62: Promote environmentally friendly, energy-efficient
development, including building and infrastructure.
Response: The proposed alignment for
Energize Eastside utilizes the existing utility
corridor, which minimizes to the extent
feasible new environmental impacts.
PSE has led all northwest utilities in energy
conservation since 1979. Its energy efficiency
programs have helped PSE customers
conserve nearly 5 billion kilowatt-hours of
electricity. PSE continues to develop and
undertake aggressive conservation programs
and the Project relies on the continued
implementation of aggressive conservation
programs.
More information on PSE’s conservation
planning and accomplishments can be found
in PSE’s 2016-2017 Biennial Conservation
Plan
(https://pse.com/aboutpse/Rates/Document
s/ees_2016_annual_rpt_energy_conservatio
n_accomplishments.pdf) and
2016 Annual Report of Energy Conservation
Accomplishments
(https://pse.com/aboutpse/Rates/Document
s/ees_2016_annual_rpt_energy_conservatio
n_accomplishments.pdf).
Economic Development Element
ED-14: Encourage investments that address future needs:
focus investment in infrastructure and services in
designated centers that align with the City’s projected
population, housing, and job growth targets.
Response: The Energize Eastside project is
an important investment in the infrastructure
needed to support Renton’s planned and
projected growth. By maintaining a reliable
electricity grid, the proposed transmission
line will support Renton’s efforts to grow its
business and residential communities.
12
Community Planning Element
CP-B: Through Community Planning, improve the
livability of Renton’s neighborhoods, preserve unique
identities, foster and enhance community character, and
prioritize the provision of City services and investment in
infrastructure.
Response: The Energize Eastside project is
an important investment in the infrastructure
needed to support Renton’s planned and
projected growth. By maintaining a reliable
electricity grid, the proposed transmission
line will support Renton’s efforts to grow its
business and residential communities.
CP-6: Implement Community Plans in concert with
Community Plan Advisory Boards who make
recommendations based on the adopted vision and goals
of their Community Plan regarding the provision of City
services and infrastructure investment.
Response: The Multi-modal Transportation
plan element of the Benson Hill Community
Plan seeks to improve the existing trail
system. Part of the strategy for this plan
element includes connecting paths with
Puget Sound Energy properties near Arnold
Park (see Sect. 2.2.4). PSE will work with the
City to support this planning element within
the limits of easements and safe operation of
the transmission lines. Section 5.2.3 of the
Strong, Livable, and Safe Neighborhoods
planning element seeks to investigate
undergrounding powerlines with PSE, but
recognizes that this would require residents
to create a special district to tax themselves
for the additional cost of undergrounding.
PSE has not been approached by affected
neighborhood associations to facilitate this
undergrounding option and associated cost.
Utility Element
U-A: Provide an adequate level of public utilities
consistent with land use, protection of the environment,
and annexation goals and policies.
Response: The Energize Eastside project is
an important investment in the infrastructure
needed to support Renton’s planned and
projected growth. As stated above, five
studies have confirmed that the Energize
Eastside project is needed to address near-
term system reliability deficiencies. By
maintaining a reliable electricity grid, the
proposed transmission line will support
Renton’s efforts to grow its business and
residential communities.
U-2: Protect the health and safety of Renton citizens
from environmental hazards associated with utility
systems through the proper design and siting of utility
facilities.
Response: PSE has conducted studies on
potential health effects of the proposed
transmission line upgrade, which have been
peer reviewed by City of Bellevue’s chosen
consultants through the SEPA review process
and the drafting of an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for this project. In particular,
the EIS looked at electric and magnetic fields
13
(EMF) and pipeline safety.
As detailed in the Phase 1 Draft
Environmental Impact Statement, no impacts
from EMF are expected from the Project.
Phase 2 DEIS at 1-27. PSE commissioned an
independent analysis on EMF. Power
Engineers, EMF Calculations and Report,
available at
http://www.energizeeastsideeis.org/uploads
/4/7/3/1/47314045/ee230_emf-
calc_rpt_rev-2_03-07-17.pdf (Chapter 10
contains a Renton-specific analysis). This
analysis found that, following Project
completion, EMF would be reduced at the
edge of the right-of-way as compared to
existing conditions, thus further ensuring that
the Project will not negatively impact the
health and safety of Renton residents. See
Power Engineers, EMF Calculations and
Report at 40 and 42.
U-3: Promote the co-location of new utility infrastructure
within rights-of-way and utility corridors, and coordinate
construction and replacement of utility systems with
other public infrastructure projects to minimize
construction- related costs and disruptions.
Response: The proposed Project route fulfills
the City’s goal of collocating utility
infrastructure in a single corridor as the
corridor (which includes the existing
transmission line) also houses the Olympic
pipeline (OPL) for a portion (0.8 mi) of the
corridor. Continued collocation of the two
utilities will help to limit neighborhood
fragmentation and other impacts from siting
a new transmission line corridor. Thus, the
Project supports the City’s policy of
promoting collocation to minimize impacts to
land use and neighborhoods.
U-4: Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions and non-City
service providers within Renton to cooperatively plan for
regional growth.
Response: The Energize Eastside project
embodies a coordinated, multi-jurisdictional
effort to cooperatively plan for regional
growth in electricity demand.
In total, five separate studies performed by
four separate parties have confirmed the
need to address Eastside transmission
capacity: Electrical Reliability Study by
Exponent, 2012 (City of Bellevue); Eastside
Needs Assessment Report by Quanta
Services, 2013 (PSE); Supplemental Eastside
Needs Assessment Report by Quanta
Services, 2015 (PSE); Independent Technical
14
Analysis by Utility Systems Efficiencies, Inc.,
2015 (City of Bellevue); and Review Memo by
Stantec Consulting Services Inc., 2015 (EIS
consultant). The identified need resulted in
an inter-jurisdictional agreement between
the Partner cities to study the environmental
effects of possible solutions to the
transmission line capacity deficit.
U-5: Approval of development should be conditioned on
the availability of adequate utility service and should not
result in decreases in local levels of service for existing
development. All new development should be required to
pay their fair share of construction costs for necessary
utility system improvements.
U-7: Non-City utility systems should be constructed in a
manner that minimizes negative impacts to existing
development and should not interfere with operation of
City utilities. City development regulations should
otherwise not impair the ability of utility providers to
adequately serve customers.
Response: The Energize Eastside is a utility
service upgrade. It increases, rather than
decreases, the local levels of service for
existing development. Other future
developments in Renton will benefit from the
increase in utility service reliability.
Negative impacts to existing development are
minimized through the use of the existing
transmission line corridor.
Operation of the Project will not interfere
with the operation of City utilities. Instead, it
will provide improved reliability of necessary
electrical service to Renton customers, which
could include the City, which also uses
electricity to support its own utility
operations.
U-43: Minimize erosion and sedimentation by requiring
appropriate construction techniques and resource
practices.
Response: Pole replacement activities are
proposed in erosion hazard areas, landslide
hazard areas, steep slope hazard areas and
coal mine hazard areas. See Renton CAR
(Appendix C; GeoEngineers Report); Renton
CAR at 40-41 (tables 8 and 9); Renton CAR at
53; Renton CAR at Section 9.2. However,
new poles are replacing existing poles, which
will be removed, and more poles will be
removed than will be installed. For pole
replacement activities, the disturbed area will
be stabilized using best management
practices (BMPs) that reduce potential
impacts, including plant replacement,
seeding, or hog fuel application in areas of
bare soil and scattering chipped wood or tree
debris. Soil removed from new pole
excavations may be scattered into vegetation
and away from landscaped areas or disposed
of offsite. If the work area is wet or has
standing water, driving mats will be used
under all equipment and all soils excavated
15
for pole installation will be removed from the
site for offsite disposal. PSE will also minimize
the use of large equipment to the extent
possible. The requirements of a Sediment
and Erosion Control Plan will be addressed in
the Project-specific Temporary Erosion and
Sediment Control Plan and Construction
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. In rare
instances, such as geological hazard areas or
associated buffers, the old poles may be cut
off approximately 1-2 feet below the ground
surface and the remaining portion of each
pole left. See Renton CAR at 8.3; Renton CAR
at Appendix E.
In wetland and stream buffers, permanent
impacts (caused by pole placement) will be
reduced by 12 ft2; tree removal (required to
meet federal utility management standards)
will result in about 8,090 ft2 of vegetation
community conversion impacts; and about
10,650 ft2 of temporary disturbance will
occur. Impacts were minimized by utilizing
the existing transmission line corridor,
limiting disturbance and implementing BMPs
when working in critical areas, and installing
transmission lines between poles with
minimal site disturbance.
U-46: Prohibit permanent structures from developing in
floodways and manage development within the 100 year
floodplain. Where development is permitted in the
floodplain, ensure compliance with FEMA floodplain
development regulations and the National Marine
Fisheries Biological Opinion regarding the National Flood
Insurance Program.
Response: Flood hazard areas within the
Project area in Renton are mapped along the
Cedar River in the corridor. Flood hazard
areas include both the 100-year floodplain
and floodway. No impacts or permanent
structures are proposed in flood hazard
areas. Renton CAR at Section 5.1.3.
U-O: Promote the availability of safe, adequate, and
efficient electrical service within the City and its planning
area, consistent with the regulatory obligation of the
utility to serve customers.
Response: The Energize Eastside project is
designed to provide safe, adequate and
efficient electrical service in Renton
specifically, and the Eastside generally.
PSE has prepared two studies that describe
the need for the Energize Eastside project:
the Eastside Needs Assessment Report and
the Supplemental Eastside Needs Assessment
Report (Gentile et al., 2014, 2015). The
deficiency in the transmission capacity on the
Eastside is based on a number of factors. Key
factors include growing population and
16
employment in the Eastside (including
significant projected growth in Bellevue),
changing power consumption patterns, and
changing utility regulations that require a
higher standard of reliability. PSE has
concluded that the most effective and
efficient solution to meet the need objectives
is to site a new 230 kV transformer at a
central location on the Eastside (Bellevue)
that will be fed from the Sammamish
substation in Redmond from the north and
the Talbot Hill substation in Renton from the
south. The upgraded transmission line
proposed in Renton will facilitate transfer of
electricity to this new transformer, which
subsequently serves the City.
Without adding transmission capacity, a
deficiency during peak periods could develop
on the Eastside as early as the winter of
2017-2018, with the potential for the
implementation of corrective action plans
including load shedding (forced power
outages) as early as the summer of 2018. The
proposed Project is needed to meet the
needs of Renton’s residents and businesses.
U-72: Coordinate with local and regional electricity
providers to ensure the siting and location of
transmission and distribution facilities is accomplished in
a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the
environment and adjacent land uses.
Response: By using an existing transmission
line corridor, the Project is designed to
minimize new impacts to existing properties
and uses adjacent to the subject property.
PSE proposes a transmission line upgrade in
an existing utility corridor that was
established in the late 1920s and early 1930s.
The current uses adjacent to the corridor
developed over time as areas became more
dense and populated. The utility corridor is
part of the existing character of these areas.
By selecting this route through Renton, PSE
limits new impacts that would result if a new
corridor were selected. Additionally, the
existing corridor ensures consistency with the
existing uses, which already accommodate
proximity to a high voltage transmission line.
PSE has also undertaken aesthetic design
work to ensure no materially detrimental
impact to adjacent properties and uses. The
new poles will be steel monopoles that are
17
generally installed in the same location or in
close proximity to the existing poles. In most
cases, the number of poles will be reduced
from four to six poles down to one pole,
which reduces visual clutter. The consistency
of the proposed transmission line upgrade
with adjacent properties was confirmed by
the Phase 2 DEIS, which found that impacts
to land use will “be less-than-significant
because [the proposed project] is consistent
with city plans, and would not adversely
affect existing or future land use patterns.”
(Phase 2 DEIS at 3.1-42).
PSE will also work with the City to assess pole
finishes (e.g., galvanized, Corten [self-
weathering], or painted [powder coat]) of the
steel monopoles to make them more visually
pleasing, thereby limiting aesthetic impacts
to adjacent uses. PSE will work with the City
and property-owners to identify preferred
species of replacement vegetation that
enhances adjacent uses to the extent
possible.
U-73: Encourage electricity purveyors to make facility
improvements and additions within existing utility
corridors wherever possible.
Response: PSE proposes a transmission line
upgrade and improvement in the existing
utility corridors consistent with The City’s
Comprehensive Plan.
Shoreline Management Element
SH-43: Trails should be developed to enhance public
enjoyment of and access to the shoreline:
…
2) Trails should be developed as an element of a system
that links together shoreline public access into an
interconnected network including active and passive
parks, schools, public and private open space, native
vegetation easements with public access, utility rights of
way, waterways, and other opportunities.
Response: Currently, no plans or access for
trail development in shorelines are being
proposed as part of the Project as PSE does
not have the property rights to do so.
SH-7: Existing and future activities on all Shorelines of
the State regulated by the City of Renton should be
designed to ensure no net loss of ecological functions.
Response: PSE’s Project does not propose
any pole replacement activities, construction
laydown, access, or vegetation management
activities in the shoreline. Rather, the Project
involves the aerial replacement of a wire
more than 200-feet over the Cedar River. As
the wires replace existing wires and all
construction work required to hang the lines
will occur outside the shoreline, the wire
replacement will not cause any loss of
18
shoreline ecological function.
Additionally, the change in voltage has no
impact on ecological function nor will it cause
a substantial adverse effect to shoreline
resources (access, aesthetics, etc.). By
utilizes the existing utility corridor new
impacts to the shorelines are avoided.
Further, the Project avoids adverse impacts
to navigation (the height of lines over the
water will be increased). As there are no
shoreline impacts, there will also be no
impact to shoreline ecological function.
In fact potential impacts to avian species will
be reduced. As explained in the DEIS,
“[t]he project would reduce the
electrocution and collision rates
for avian species. The most
common cause of avian
electrocution is when birds
simultaneously contact two power
phases (wires carrying different
charge). Avian electrocutions occur
most frequently with lower voltage
distribution lines (30 kV or less)
because conductors on most these
lines are narrowly spaced and can
be bridged by birds, particularly
those with large wing spans
(Dwyer et al., 2013; SCL, 2014).
Electrocution incidences are lower
with higher voltage transmission
lines because of the greater
separation between wires. For the
Energize Eastside project, spacing
of the 230 kV wires would typically
be greater than the existing 115 kV
lines, which would reduce the
electrocution potential.”
DEIS at 3.4-17. In sum, the Project will, to
some degree, improve ecological functions
from the existing conditions by reducing
electrocution risk.
19
Appropriate Location: The proposed location shall not result in the detrimental overconcentration of a
particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed location
shall be suited for the proposed use.
Response: PSE is proposing to replace the existing 115 kV transmission lines with 230 kV
transmission lines. The upgrade is located entirely within PSE’s existing 100-foot electrical
transmission utility corridor. After deliberate review and extensive stakeholder input, PSE proposes
to undertake this work in the existing transmission line corridor rather than siting a new corridor
through Renton communities. Use of the existing corridor (which has housed transmission lines
since the 1920s and 30s) minimizes environmental impacts and impacts to adjacent uses to the
fullest extent feasible. The transmission line replacement will reduce the number of poles within
the corridor by over 70% from 144 to 41 poles. Also, the vast majority of the utility corridor does not
currently house other electrical utilities. Thus, the proposed Project does not over concentrate the
particular land use, which is already an existing utility corridor. The utility corridor is part of the
existing character of the area. By selecting this route through Renton, PSE limits new impacts and
ensures consistency with the existing uses, which already accommodate a utility corridor.
Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial
or undue adverse effects on adjacent property.
Response: The consistency of the proposed transmission lines upgrade with adjacent properties
was confirmed by the Phase 2 DEIS, which found that impacts to land use will “be less-than-
significant because [the proposed Project] is consistent with city plans, and would not adversely
affect existing or future land use patterns” (Phase 2 DEIS at 3.1-44). The 230 kV transmission line
upgrade is proposed within the existing 115 kV utility corridor and the replaced poles will generally
be installed in the same location or in close proximity to the existing poles. Additionally, the number
of poles will be reduced by over 70%. The proposed transmission line replacement will have
temporary construction impacts on surrounding neighbors as many of the transmission poles are
within easements in residential backyards. However, construction impacts will be minimized to the
greatest extent feasible through use of mainly existing or historic access routes that were used for
initial pole installation and/or maintenance activities.
A safe work area will be established around each pole removal and installation location, providing
space for placing equipment, vehicles, and materials. The installation time for poles depends on
whether a given pole is placed on a foundation or is directly embedded. Poles on foundations take
longer. Typically, pole foundation work takes 1 to 3 days; setting the pole takes 1 to 2 days; and
stringing the wires across the pole takes 1 or 2 days. Stages of work can be separated by up to 1
month or more. Accordingly, in any given location, construction activities typically take place over 3
to 7 days within a 2 month period. Additional time may be required for site preparation, installation
of BMPs, and site restoration. For direct embed steel poles with no foundation, the hole is typically
prepared and the pole is set in a single day. The wires are typically installed up to a month later.
PSE will work with individual property owners to restore areas impacted during construction to its
previous, or an improved, state. PSE will work with property owners and the City to identify
20
preferred species for replacement vegetation, with a focus on native species, so as to enhance
adjacent uses to the extent possible. PSE will mitigate for impacts in a manner that is consistent
with the applicable regulations when on-site restoration is not possible. All applicable codes and
standards will be followed during design and construction, including electrical, stormwater and
erosion control, tree protection, and noise codes.
Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the scale and character of the neighborhood.
Response: The Energize Eastside project is compatible with the existing scale and character of
development in the Project neighborhood, which includes other tall vertical structures and trees.
The proposed upgraded transmission lines are located in an existing utility corridor, where existing
land uses are predominantly vacant (42%). Non-vacant land uses are primarily transportation and
single-family residential uses located adjacent to the existing transmission lines. Approximately 185
parcels are immediately adjacent to the existing corridor. The Project, as designed, will not change
the use of these parcels. Unique land uses include Sierra Heights Elementary School, Renton
Seventh-day Adventist Church, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Renton Technical College,
North Highlands Neighborhood Center, and a large commercial area along NE Sunset Blvd. The
Renton segment goes through the residential neighborhoods of Honey Creek Ridge, Shadow Hawk,
Liberty Ridge, Glencoe, and Sunset (Renton Highlands). Honey Creek Ridge, Shadow Hawk, Liberty
Ridge, and Glencoe are predominantly single-family and multi-family planned-developments with
designated park spaces. Sunset (Renton Highlands) is one of Renton’s older developed areas and is
comprised of commercial and residential uses; it is currently being redeveloped with new multi-
family, parks, library, and commercial land uses. Several parks are along the corridor, including May
Creek Greenway, Honey Creek Greenway, and the Cedar River Natural Zone.
PSE designed the Project to use the existing transmission line corridor that was established in the
late 1920s and early 1930s. The current uses adjacent to the corridor developed over time as areas
were annexed into the City and these areas became more dense and populated, particularly starting
in the 1940s when Boeing Airplane Company built its Renton Boeing plant for production of B-29s.
The utility corridor is part of the existing character of the adjacent neighborhoods, which house
many tall vertical structures including light poles, street lights, electrical lines (including Seattle City
Light’s existing lattice tower 230kV transmission lines), communication towers, buildings, and trees
(including Douglas fir, which have a mature height of 70 ft to over 300 ft). By selecting this route
through Renton, PSE limits new impacts and ensures consistency with the existing uses, which
already accommodates transmission line facilities, which are typically the tallest features in the
corridor.
PSE’s proposed transmission line upgrade design involves replacing the existing 144 H-frame wood
115-kV transmission poles with 41 steel monopoles to accommodate 230-kV conductors (e.g.,
wires). The replacement poles will generally be installed in the same location or in close proximity
to the existing poles. This design provides over a 70% reduction in transmission poles within the
corridor. The reduction in poles reduces aesthetic impacts to adjacent uses by eliminating visual
clutter, which is arguably more compatible with adjacent neighborhoods. The average pole height
21
being proposed in Renton is approximately 85 feet (variance option); however, actual heights are
location dependent. Additionally, the replacement poles will not preclude compatible existing and
future uses of the adjacent properties.
The Phase 2 DEIS concluded that “[o]verall, impacts to the aesthetic environment from the Renton
Segment would be less-than-significant” (See Phase 2 DEIS at 3.2-87). Plans and policies of Renton
do not directly address mitigation of impact to scenic views or the aesthetic environment. However,
PSE will also work with the City to assess various pole finishes (e.g., galvanized, Corten [self-
weathering], painted) to limit aesthetic impacts to the neighborhood and protect public scenic views
(Plan policy L-55). PSE will also work with the City and property owners to identify preferred species
of replacement vegetation, with a focus on native species, so as to enhance adjacent uses to the
extent possible.
The Renton Comprehensive Plan land use designations include Single-Family Residential and Multi-
Family Residential. This indicates that the neighborhoods will continue to have residential land uses
along the existing corridor for the foreseeable future. The policies specific to the Plan indicate an
intent to preserve the current residential character while providing for concentrated growth where
necessary (Plan Goals L-H and L-I, and Policies L-15, L-16, and L-171). The consistency of the
proposed transmission lines with existing land use pattern and neighborhood character was
confirmed by the Phase 2 DEIS, which concluded that the “Project would not impact affect the
existing land use pattern of single-family residential” and “future land use, which are anticipated to
be mostly single-family residential, mixed-use, and commercial” (Phase 2 DEIS at 3.1-45). All
potential SEPA impacts must be assessed against the existing transmission line and the existing
property rights granted with the establishment of the utility corridor. See, Chuckanut Conservancy
v. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, 156 Wn. App. 274, 292-93, 232, P.3d
1154,1163 (2010).
Parking: Adequate parking is, or will be made, available.
Response: The Project is a transmission line upgrade and thus, no parking is necessary or provided
as a component of the Project. If necessary, construction vehicles will utilize parking spaces or
adjacent street parking during active construction. In addition, it is possible that recreation sites or
facilities may be used for temporary construction staging. PSE would work with the appropriate
cities to identify suitable locations for staging that would result in minimal impacts to parking. Such
suitable locations may include overflow parking areas or parts of the site that are underutilized.
Traffic: The use shall ensure safe movement for vehicles and pedestrians and shall mitigate potential
effects on the surrounding area.
Response: The proposed transmission line upgrade will ensure safe movement of vehicles and
pedestrians and mitigate potential impacts in the Project area. The proposed transmission line
upgrade is located within the existing utility corridor. This corridor has been established for almost a
1See Renton Comprehensive Plan, August 2016.
22
century. Because adjacent land uses and roads already integrate with the transmission lines, once
operational, the upgraded transmission lines are not expected to disrupt vehicles or pedestrians in
the surrounding areas.
During construction, impacts will be limited in duration and mitigated consistent with Renton’s
code. Construction vehicle access to pole replacement sites will be made from existing roads or
newly constructed temporary access roads. During design, PSE worked to locate poles near existing
accessible routes to minimize impacts to traffic from Project construction. PSE will work to maintain
access to roads and recreation sites while providing a safe working area for crews and the public.
During individual pole replacement and wire stringing, the public may be temporarily
inconvenienced by construction activities; however, impacts will be short in duration at each site
and less than significant as confirmed in the Phase 2 DEIS at 4.6-2 and 4.6-13. Also, the transmission
line upgrade does not require the construction of walls, fences or screening vegetation, which
further ensures that the existing uses and circulation will not be disrupted.
Access to adjacent land uses would be maintained during construction. Informal recreational
activities occur throughout the Project area. There are both formal and informal recreation trails
within and across several segments of the existing PSE transmission line corridor, which is generally
viewed as a green belt. Trails along the Renton segment include: Sierra Heights Park trail, Honey
Creek Greenway, portions of the May Creek Greenway, the Cedar River Trail (part of the Cedar River
Natural Area), and Riverview Park trails. During pole installation and wire stringing, trail access in
proximity to the transmission line will be limited to protect public safety. The total duration of trail
access impacts will range from 3 to 7 days at each pole site depending on the method of pole
installation (see description of construction techniques and duration above). Post-construction,
neighboring properties will have the same uses and circulation patterns as currently exist.
PSE will work with the City to ensure that appropriate mitigation measures are implemented at the
Project site. Mitigation of temporary impacts to pedestrian uses during construction may include
the following: avoiding construction during peak trail usage, providing alternative points of access
and detours, 2-week advanced notification of temporary trail closures, and signage of temporary
closures along trails or park entrances at least one week in advance of closures. Bicycle and
pedestrian use of roads or sidewalks may be temporarily restricted while poles are replaced or wires
strung along roads to protect public safety. Mitigation of potential impacts to traffic could include
“maintenance of traffic” plans that identify traffic control and detours to maintain mobility and
safety for vehicular and non-motorized travelers and maintain access to properties (Phase 1 DEIS at
1-44).
Noise, Light and Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts from the proposed use shall be evaluated
and mitigated.
Response: The proposed transmission line replacement will not result in any significant noise, light,
or glare impacts when completed and in use.
23
Noise. Chapter 9 of the Phase I DEIS contains an analysis of potential operational and construction-
related noise impacts. With respect to operational impacts, the Phase I DEIS states that
“Potential operational impacts from overhead transmission lines associated with
any of the transmission line alternatives would occur from corona discharge. The
maximum corona noise produced from 230 kV lines at ground level during wet
weather conditions [is] a relatively low noise level that would not be noticeable in
most suburban environments. . . Background ambient noise levels in suburban
residential areas of King County fall between 40 and 50 dBA during nighttime hours.
Even in rural areas, corona noise from 230 kV transmission lines would be unlikely
to impact sensitive uses. Consequently, audible corona noise would be a negligible
operational noise impact…”
Phase I DEIS at 9-14.
The proposed transmission line replacement may have temporary construction-related noise
impacts on surrounding neighbors as many of the transmission poles are within easements in
residential backyards. These impacts include increased presence of construction vehicles,
equipment, materials, and personnel. Temporary construction impacts (consistent with the limited
durations described above) would terminate once construction is complete. PSE will comply with all
City codes and approvals relating to hours of construction and noise.
Project construction will entail the installation of poles and stringing of conductor wires. Typical
equipment required for installation includes vactor trucks, cranes, concrete trucks (for pouring
foundations), and “boom trucks” for lifting up personnel and materials. Table 9-4 of the Phase I
DEIS contains the typical noise levels for the equipment used during the Project’s construction
phase. Pole installation typically requires 3–7 days each (within a 2-month work window); no
significant excavation is required and installation would not create significant noise. Noise-
generating activity during pole installation would occur for a relatively short period of time. The
Phase I DEIS concludes that “[w]hile likely to be above background noise levels, [Project impacts]
would likely be within the restrictions for construction noise in Section 12.88 of the King County
Code (and most local codes), which exempt construction noise from quantitative noise exposure
limits but restrict construction noise to daytime hours.” Phase I DEIS at 9-10. Any nuisance caused
by the short-term construction activities would be ‘less-than-significant’ (Phase 2 DEIS 4.1.1 and 4.4-
9).
Some of the areas along the Renton segment are possible candidate locations for the use of
helicopters because of the complex terrain in the area. It is important to note that using a
helicopter is the last option utilized by a contractor due to costs and additional FAA permitting.
Although not required, one of the most efficient methods of installing new conductor on poles is to
use a helicopter, which would be used to pull a rope or “sock line” from pole to pole. Once the rope
is in place, the rope is then used to pull in the new conductor (wire). Non-helicopter methods
required personnel to pull the sock line between poles by walking to each structure.
24
The use of helicopters is most likely for the crossing over the Cedar River. Helicopter use facilitates
faster installation of wires and often includes minimizing land disturbance that may be necessary to
access pole locations, thereby reducing traditional access and associated restoration costs. If
helicopters are used, PSE and their contractor would comply with the local and FAA congested air
permit conditions and notification requirements2, including those related to the Renton Municipal
Airport. As these are specialty helicopters and work techniques, the work would likely be scheduled
weeks in advance. The public notice and awareness outreach would be flexible and could be
communicated in advance. Additional analysis on helicopter use will be provided in the FEIS.
Light and Glare. Chapter 11 of the Phase I DEIS analyzes potential light and glare impacts from
Project construction and operation. The proposed transmission line replacement may have
temporary construction-related impacts. These impacts include increased presence of construction
vehicles, equipment, materials, and personnel, as well as the potential for temporary increased light
and glare associated with temporary construction site lighting. See Phase I DEIS at 11-25.
Operational light and glare impacts would be de minimis. The transmission poles themselves are not
lit. As discussed in the Phase I DEIS, “The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has standards and
guidelines that determine when structures need to be marked and lighted for aircraft safety. It is not
anticipated that aviation warning lights would be required for this project because the proposed
electrical infrastructure, including transmission poles, would be less than 200 feet in height and
would not exceed the obstruction standards contained in 14 CFR Part 77 (FAA, 2007).” The Phase I
DEIS notes that steel poles are “more likely to result in glare impacts,” but that “[i]f steel poles are
used, a non-reflective coating would be used.” Phase I DEIS at 11-37.
Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings, paving, or critical
areas. Additional landscaping may be required to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse
effects of the proposed use.
Response: PSE is committed to preserving vegetation that can safely coexist with transmission lines.
The majority of the existing transmission line corridor is naturally vegetated or has been planted by
residents. Access to poles in critical area buffers located in the transmission corridor will generally
occur using existing, partially vegetated access (established during original construction and re-used
over time to maintain the corridor).
Post construction, all disturbed areas will be re-vegetated, as necessary, and left to return to their
natural state in compliance with vegetation management plans and requirements. Typically, crushed
vegetation rebounds within one growing season resulting in only temporary impacts to vegetation.
Vegetation in the existing corridor is routinely managed. The corridor was initially disturbed during
original construction in the 1920s and 1930s (including clearing associated with construction
2 http://fsims.faa.gov/WDocs/8700.1%20GA%20Ops%20Insp%20Handbk/Volume%202/2_102_00.htm
25
activities for the line itself and associated access roads) as well as subsequent parking lots,
subdivisions, trails, and residential and commercial development. Disturbance is regular and
ongoing due to vegetation maintenance and pole replacement activities. With the exception of
Honey Creek Open Space and Cedar River Natural Area, the majority of trees in the existing corridor
are ornamental and associated with existing property uses.
Vegetation in a transmission line corridor that has an operational voltage of more than 200 kV must
be managed in compliance with federal requirements, resulting in limitations with regard to the
type and scope of landscaping that is allowable. Vegetation management standards vary depending
upon the location of vegetation management in relation to transmission wires. Consistent with
federal standards, vegetation in the wire zone (i.e., 10-ft outside wires) must have a mature height
of no greater than 15 feet, unless the local topography is sufficient to allow a 20-foot vertical
clearance between the power lines and the mature height of trees under the power lines. Trees can
be taller outside the wire zone. The deep ravine cut by the Cedar River allows retention of taller
trees under the upgraded transmission lines.
PSE will mitigate impacts to trees that are necessary to meet federal transmission line operational
standards identified in the Renton Critical Areas Report (Watershed 2018). To mitigate for loss of
significant trees in the transmission corridor, PSE is proposing mitigation ratios that meet or exceed
regulatory standards as proposed in the Renton Tree Retention Plan (Watershed 2017). PSE will
work with affected property owners, the City, and other stakeholders to replace trees in the most
effective manner that meets the permit conditions. Much of the corridor is within private
properties, including homeowners’ backyards, and is fenced off. PSE has been meeting with these
property owners along the existing corridor to discuss tree replacement and landscaping, and will
continue to work together to develop property-specific landscaping and tree replacement plans,
with a focus on controlling invasive species and enhancing native species. Where individual property
owners decline to have new trees planted onsite, PSE will work with the City to place additional
trees offsite or will participate in the City’s fee in lieu program. Offsite options may include city parks
and neighborhood groups/HOAs. One benefit of offsite planting is the option to plant larger trees
that will contribute to habitat quality and area aesthetics.