Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-01-084 Smooth �eed SheetsT"" Use template for 5160� 112305906508 102305904009 102305902607 ANDERSON ROBERT L BALES LTD PS BASHARY SHAY PO BOX 353 13401 156TH AVE SE 10025 SE 260TH ST MAPLE VALLEY WA RENTON WA KENT WA 98038 98059 98031 102305930608 102305935003 273920008003 BENNER CLAY S+PATRICIA L BERG BRIAN D BIELKA RONALD G 14324 SE 125TH ST 12035 148TH AVE SE 18419 SE 122ND RENTON WA RENTON WA ISSAQUAH WA 98059 98059 98027 102305914503 102305930806 273920001008 BIGELOW CAROLYN BLESSING EMERY A+DONNA J BOWEN JR RALPH P+BRENDA M 6929 37TH SW 14330 SE 125TH ST 12415 149TH AVE SE SEATTLE WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98126 98059 98059 102305914206 112305908405 102305934501 BYERSDORFER DEBORAH PHELPS CAMPBELL DON R DAUGHERTY GREGORY WAYNE BYERSDORFER GREGORY A 12022 148TH AVE SE 12201 148TH AVE SE 22651 SE 56TH ST RENTON WA RENTON WA ISSAQUAH WA 98029 98059 98059 112305903208 102305931606 112305909106 DAVISON MATHEW J+KIMMI R EBBERT DAVID M ELLIS STANLEY E 14831 SE 120TH ST 459 NILE AVE NE PO BOX 2442 RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98055 112305907506 102305903308 273920005009 ENGH DALE+ENGH MARY E FIFER RUTH L LVNG TRST FLATTUM PATRICIA LEE ROBINSON- 14325 SE 125TH 12422 148TH AVE SE 12250 148TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 9RO59 102305936803 102305934105 273920019000 GACEK THERESA HELEN ETAL GILBERT KEITH C+CATHERINE C HALFHILL DAVID K&SUSAN L 2823 16TH AVE SO 12609 148TH AVE SE 12428 149TH AVE SE SEATTLE WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98144 98059 98059 273920017004 102305919205 102305917001 HAMMOND JAMES C+ERIKA L HOAGUE ROBERT L HODGE HAROLD D 12414 149TH AVE SE 431 NILE AVE NE 19210 121ST PL SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98058 273920007104 102305938403 112305908702 HOHLBEIN ERIK F+MICHELLE L HOILAND JOHN D ET AL HOLMQUIST ALAN D+JUNE LEA 12438 148TH AVE SE 1411 S CONCORD#5 12050 148TH SE RENTON WA SEATTLE WA RENTON WA 98059 98108 98059 112305905302 102305902201 102305941506 HOOVER LEON A HUNSAKER JIM HUNSAKER JIM&DENISE 12012 148TH AVE SE 11335 DURLAND PL NE HUNSAKER PAT RENTON WA SEATTLE WA 12409 148TH SE 98059 98125 RENTON WA 98059 n� AVERYo Address Labels Laser 5160� Smooth Feed SheetsT"" Use template for 5160� 102305931903 112305901004 102305915807 HURLOCKER CHARLES W+NORMA JARVIS JERRY D JOHNSON WALTER M+KATHRYN M A 12204 148TH SE 12006 142ND AVE SE 12217 148H AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 9RO59 102305935508 102305939104 273920016006 KELLY BRYANT K S KING COUNTY KINGSTON CHARLIE&STACY 12601 148TH AVE SE 500 KC ADMIN BLDG SOOA 12406 149TH AVE SE RENTON WA SEATTLE WA RENTON WA 98059 98104 98059 102305903803 273920015008 112305903000 KOCH JOHN E+PATRICIA D KRISTOFERSON RICHARD LACKEY JOAN 12605 148TH AVE SE 15807 60TH DR SE 5902 NE 4TH ST RENTON WA SNOHOMISH WA RENTON WA 98059 98296 98059 102305906905 273920006007 102305938304 LAI MAN-LING LARSON JAMES M+GLORIA E MARTIN KENNETH A 12841 LUNADA PL 12430 148TH AVE SE 12439 148TH AVE SE SAN DIEGO CA RENTON WA RENTON WA 92128 98059 98059 102305903506 112305907001 102305904900 MCTIGHE JOHN+ETAL METCALFE WII,LIAM MOORE MONTE D+KAREN L 24929 267TH SE 12260 148TH SE 12226 142ND AVE SE RAVENSDALE WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98051 98059 98059 112305902309 112305902101 273920003004 MULLENBERG DEAN&CAROLYN MULLENBERG DEAN J+CAROLYN L MUNRO RICHARD G+BARBARA C 5816 NE 4TH PL 5816 NE 4TH ST 12414 148TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 112305909304 112305906706 112305901707 N G PROPERTIES L L C NUGYEN NGOC OLDING TERRY L 6234 139TH AVE SE 12232 148TH SE 466 NILE AVE NE BELLEVUE WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98006 98059 98059 102305903001 273920011007 102305904207 PALANCHUK GEORGIY+NATALYA PALZER CATHY PHUNG AN T 12205 148TH AVE SE 36256 SE FISH HATCHERY RD 9333 57TH AVE W RENTON WA FALL CITY WA MUKILTEO WA 98059 98024 98275 102305923108 102305921904 102305925905 PIELE LEONARD+BRENDA PINCOMBE ROBERT S POWERS JACK M+DENISE T 14309 SE 125TH ST 451 NILE AVE NE 12207 148TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 102305911301 102305932000 102305904108 PRUMMER FRANCIS J REED LAWRENCE A REID BENNIE J+BARBARA J 12227 142ND AVE SE 465 NILE AVE NE 5318 NE 4TH ST RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 /�� AVERYo Address Labels Laser 5160� Smooth Feed SheetsT"" Use template for 5160� 273920024000 102305901609 273920026005 REPENN ROGER RIBERA-BALKO ENTERPRISES RILEY JOHN 12422 149TH AVE SE 16400 SOUTHCENTER PKWY STE308 12414 149TH AVE SE RENTON WA SEATTLE WA RENTON WA 98059 98188 98059 102305902300 112305903109 273920020008 SCHIRMAN MICHAEL+WOLF CYNTH SCOTT SHARON ELIZABETH SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 12013 148H AVE SE 12610 148TH AVE SE 12436 149TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 112305900204 273920010009 102305917407 SHENK DAVID&LARRY SIKES DONALD K JR+CINDY I P SMITH ROY 12206 148TH SE 33010 SE 118TH ST 12265 148TH ST SE RENTON WA ISSAQUAH WA RENTON WA 98059 98027 98059 112305907803 102305918900 102305917902 TOMLINSON ERIC D+AUTUMN WALTOSZ JAMES H WATERS THOMAS M 12240 148TH AVE SE 12021 148TH AVE SE 12220 142ND S E RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 102305902102 `22y�`j �j`��i�f �CI�.k /y0�/`l�'I!�' WEGNER BRETT+MARY K G6a� /i b�� C�� ./��1� �c�� LLll�/G� ��31J5�G//�J� � 122ll 148TH AVE SE �'�` �P�� 3�`9 �U�l�� # RENTON WA 9�� l� �� 9sos9 /C�i��; GvA � %gb3¢ ��lGv�,GvA - 4�D3 �.�. cl�i�d5 �oyi �or�i ,�v�� Gvilvo� /Z oo� /4g'��e S� Pa. � 5�8Zo2 /�ar6or�a,�s T��e�o�, GUA � 98'05� ��'�o�� Gv!- q�'a�g �o�D s � ��'�-�-�, ��a/,lrU�� , cv�. 9�'�� n �y��I�o� ��X ��lf� /g zD/ /��'�ff��/ R��-i, �� 9d'Or.� n� AVERYo Address labels � �aser 5160� .�.e,.�-�—+-o-c�.. �:, ,;, CITY OF RENTUN � Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Planning 7 e Tanner,Mayor Susan Carlson,Administrator April 8, 2002 Sarah Slatten Cam West Development,Inc. 9720 NE 120"'Place Kirkland,WA 98034 SUBJECT: BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD DECISION REGARDING PROCESSING OF ANNEXATIONS BY PETITION Dear Sarah: The Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County recently notified us that they no longer have the authority to process annexations by the petition process,even where there is 100% support within the proposed annexation area. They have told us that even those applications that preceded the State Supreme Court's March 14`�',2002 ruling in the Grant Cou�ztv Fire District No. S et al versus Citv of Moses Lake Case are now being returned to their respective jurisdictions by the Board. Until.the State Supreme Court reconsiders its decision or the legislature comes up with an alternative to the election process,the latter is the only method now available for undertaking annexations in the state. Because of the cost of special elections most municipalities have avoided using this approach unless it is for a fairly large geographical area. During the interim you may want to look at the Washington State Association of Cities web page at: www.awcnet.org/annexation.htm It contains a number of newspaper articles from around the region and will post information on what is happening on this issue over the next few months. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me(424-430-6581)or Rebecca Lind,Planning Manager,at 425-430-6588. Sincerel , r • Don Erickson, AICP Senior Planner cc: Rebecca Lind 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N �This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U R V E Annexation Review Form - Shamrock Annexation (60°Io) ( ) 10% Notice of Intent (X) 60%Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility /4 °jrYOF Fire Water Utility FCF�vroti Parks Wastewater Utility �.Q� , F� Police Transportation �j J Pubiic Works Maintenance Current Planning ��NG��?��2 FROM : Don Erickson, AICP / Senior Planner �S��N Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT : Proposed Shamrock Annexation Location ; Generally north and west of the existing city limits north of NE 4'h Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 150'h Avenue SE, if extended, on the east, Date Circulated: 03/08/02 Comments Due: 03/19/02 General information Area ; 66.6 acres Street length ; 0 Assessed Value : $6,829,000 Estimated Population : 65 Current Uses Residential : ± 20 dwellings, majority of area vacant Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public ; Streets only, Comp Plan : Resource Conservation Designation Future Uses; : Single family Future Po ulation • Est. 480 ersons 260 homes Reviewing Department/Division: �°�va'�� 1 , Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? / �'� 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? /�o (O�er) 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? �G�� 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? /�/�v;�� 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? ��/� b. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map,) /�� General recommendation and comments: � � Signature: � f � Date: �!/�� Annexation Review Form — Shamrock Annexation (60%) ( ) 10% Notice of Intent (X) 60%Annexatfon Petition TO ; Building y Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM , Don Erickson, AICP / Senior Planner - .. Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Plari�in� ; ��'�p� � 2002 � SUBJECT : Proposed Shamrock Annexation ; ; � , Location . Generally north and west of the existin�i�y°limlts north of:,l� 4'"Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 150'h Avenue SE, if extended, on the east Date Circulated: 03/08/02 Comments Due: 03/19/02 General Information Area ; 66.6 acres Street length : 0 Assessed Value ; $6,829,000 Estimated Population ; 65 Current Uses Residential ; t 20 dwellings, majority of area vacant Commercial , N/A Industrial : N/A Public , Streets only Comp Plan . Resource Conservation Designatfon Future Uses; , Single family Future Population Est, 480 ersons 260 homes Reviewing Department/Division: P/B/PW Transportation Systems DEvision 1, Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? Yes. Recent King County development proposals for this annexation area do not include the extension of SE 124�" Street (NE 6�' Street in Renton) west of 148th Avenue SE. This street extension is an important segment in establishing NE 6th Street as an easUwest neighborhood collector (an alternative to NE 4th Street) serving the area to the east beyond Renton's current city limits. It is anticipated that this proposed annexation, should it happen, will enhance the City's opportunity for the westerly extension of SE 124�' Street. 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficlencies In existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? Yes. Curb and gutter, sidewalks, and street lighting that meet City of Renton standards are sporadic or do r.ot c�_�rrAntly �x;st an PY�s+incs strAets within +he proposed annexation area. Also, existing pavement width and thickness do not meet Renton standards, Transportation Systems Division staff have Identified NE 6'h Street as the most logical and viable corridor for expanding the east/west collector network of streets serving Northeast Renton and the area east of Renton's current city limits. Therefore, extension of SE 124'" Street (NE b'h Street) west of 148r"Avenue SE, through the proposed annexation area, as well as any other new internal roadways, elther publlc or private, wlll need to be provided according to Renton City Code requlrements and/or standards, , Upgrading substandard roadway features on exlsting s�reets, and the extension of SE 124'h Street and other internal roadways withln the proposed annexation (Over) area Is not currenfly funded by the City of Renton, and, therefore would be at the expense of new development or private property owners. 3, Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? � Yes 4, What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? Additional transportation staff would not be required to serve the proposed annexati�n area. Assume the extension of SE 124'"Street(NE 6'" Street) to the west of 148'h Avenue SE (as discussed above) and other new internal roadways would be needed.to serve the proposed annexation area. These roadways and any upgrading of existing roadways would be at the expense of new development or private property owners, Affer annexation, maintenance of transportatfon facilities, including street pavement and gutters, sidewalks, pavement markings, signs, and street lighting on existing and new streets wouid be funded and accomplished by the City of Renton, Energy costs assoc(ated with providing street Iighting for existing and new streets may also be funded by the City. These maintenance and energy costs shouid not be a flnancial burden, (fhe burden of roadway maintenance costs should be verified with the Maintenance Division.) 5. Would the City assume ownership or responslbility for facilities currently owned or managed by another Jurisd(ction? Wouid new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? Yes, the City would assume ownership or responsibility for portions of 148'h Avenue�E, SE 124'h Street, 149"' Avenue SE and 150'h Avenue SE within the proposed annexation area that are currently managed by King County, No new agreements would be required as a result of this annexation. b. Would altarnate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the atfiached map.) No. General recommendation and comments: The Transportation Systems Division supports the proposF�d annexation, especially if it wili enhance the opportunity to extend SE 124'"Street(NE b�'Street)to the west of 148"'Avenue SE. � �Signature; �� Date: � Nick Afzali — Transportation anning and Programming �� , CITY OF RENTON „� Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Planning J e Tanner,Mayor Susan Carlson,Administrator March 18, 2002 Kurt Wilson Harbor Homes 1010 South 336�'Street Federal Way,WA 98003 SUBJECT: RECENT STATE SUPREME COURT DECISION REGARDING ANNEXATIONS BY PETITION Dear Kurt: In light of last week's Supreme Court decision regarding annexation by the petition process, the City of Renton has suspended activity on all annexations using this process until clarification is received by us on how to process existing and new annexations. Since the Shamrock Annexation is by petition, it is one of eight City annexations that are affected by the Court's decision. We will inform you as soon as we receive definitive information on how to proceed. Thank you in advance for your patience as we try to resolve this matter. Sincerely, ✓ Don Erickson,AICP Senior Planner cc: Rebecca Lind 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N �This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U RV E Annexation Review Form - Shamrock Annexation (60%) ( ) 10% Notice of Intent (X) 60%Annexation Petition �.. �'M,�,;,�,�,,. TO : Building Surface Water Utility � ::�� CITV OF RENTON Fire Water Utility � RECEIVED ��,� �� Parks Wastewater Utility �, �� 4 �� R � � 2�1 Police Transportation �r� � Public Works Maintenance Current Planning L�oSY�FMO/v BUILDING DIVISIQW - FROM . Don Erickson, AICP/Senior Pianner Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning SUBJECT : Proposed Shamrock Annexation Location : Generally north and west of the existing city limits north of NE 4"'Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 150"'Avenue SE, if extended, on the east, Date Circulated: 03/08/02 Comments Due: 03/19/02 General Information Area : 66.6 acres Street length : 0 Assessed Value : $6,829,000 Estimated Population : 65 Current Uses Residential : ±20 dwellings, majority of area vacant Commerciai : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : Streets only. Comp Plan : Resource Conservation Designation Future Uses; : Single family Future Po ulation Est. 480 erson 260 homes Reviewing Department/Division: 1, Does this annexation rep�r'esent any unique or significant problems for your department/division. �� 2��; ��,r7�� ,!'�� ;�,� 2. Are you aware of any probiems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? >J c��^�d�� `�- ��-�f,�� l/�=��1�1'L� /`�co 4 �� r��',�-,� ��/ �'�� r�� 1�.� ,�r� ��1 S/�vv��'� (Over) 3. Does this proposed annexatio represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? � �� 4. What additional facilities or staff wouid be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a resuit of this annexation? �i�1�I�'"1 j �� //�%'�C�i��?�1.� `iCL �i�ii�`-,l�.� ��1Tjo�/,� �'��.ei��, 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdict�? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? J �� b. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the aitached map.) �� L�� General recommendation and comments: ,��r�i�� /�� . �`��5 � �� S nature; �ate: l .:� Annexation Review Form — Shamrock Annexation (60%) [ ] 10% Notice of Intent [ X ] 60% Annexation Petition TO . Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM . Don Erickson, AICP / Senior Planner Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Shamrock Annexation Location . Generally north and west of the existing City limits north of NE 4"' Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 150`h Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. Date Circulated: 03/08/02 Comments Due: 03/19/02 General Information Area . 66.6 acres Street length . 0 Assessed Value . 56,829,000 Estimated Population . 65 Current Uses Residential . + 20 dwellings, majority of area vacant Commercial . N/A Industrial . N/A Public . Streets only. Comp Plan Designation . Resource Conservation Future Uses: . Single family Future Population Est. 480 persons (260 homes) Reviewing Department/Division: PBPW/Surface Water Utilitv 1 . Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? The proposed annexation does not present any unique or significant problems for the Surface Water Utility. There is additional maintenance cost associated with maintaining, operating and replacing existing storm infrastructure within the proposed annexation that needs to be accounted for in the budgeting of resources needed to provide service to the area. The annexation area lies within two major basins (Cedar River and May Creek) and drains to the Maplewood Creek and Honey Creek sub-basins. Future development should be required to comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) Level 2 flow control or current City Standards that are in place at the time of development if they are stricter than the 1998 KCSWDM standards. (Over) 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? Based upon a review of the King County Drainage Complaint inventory, no drainage problems have been reported in the area. Based upon King County's storm system inventory, there are no stormwater retention/detention or water quality treatment facilities in the area that are maintained currently by King County. Currently there is approximately 1,700 linear feet of existing storm pipe system that ranges from 12" to 18" in diameter. There is approximately 1,350 linear feet of existing ditch and 9 Type-1 catch basins. Some of the storm pipe systems were installed with a 26-lot subdivision prior to 1960, and are in fair condition structurally, but could use cleaning. The existing storm system generally appears to be adequate for current runoff conditions, but some improvements may be needed in the future to replace old and failing storm system or due to the need to upsize the system to better manage future land use runoff conditions. 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? Yes, the proposed annexation area is within the drainage basin areas that are currently served by the City of Renton. 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? The annual maintenance cost associated with maintaining the existing drainage infrastructure, assuming maintenance is needed once every 5-years, is estimated to be approximately 53,1 12 per year, as shown below: TYPE OF SIZES NUMBER UNIT COST TOTAL AVERAGE FACILITY (Maint. Only) COST ANNUAL COST Pipe 12" & 18" 1,700 L.F. $0.34/L.F. 5578 5116/yr Cleaning Catch Type I 9 S 14.17 Each $128 $26/yr Basins Cleaning Ditch 1-2 ft. deep 1,350 L.F. S11/L.F. 514,850 $2,970/yr Cleaning TOTAL: 515,556 53,112/yr Note: Costs are based upon average cost information provided by the City's Public Works Maintenance Division. H:\DI V I SION.S\UTILITI E.S\DOCS\2002\2002-159.doc\tb r , As the area develops, additional stormwater facilities will be needed to manage the runoff from the new development. It is assumed that these systems will be installed by the new developments. An estimated S 10,000 to S 15,000 of CIP funding may be needed to improve existing drainage infrastructure. Public Works Maintenance staffing may need to be increased to maintain the growing infrastructure due to this and other annexations and new development within existing City limits. Estimated total cost impact to the Surface Water Utility due to the annexation is approximately S3,1 12 per year with S 10,000 to 515,000 CIP funding. The estimated Surface Water Utility rate revenue that will be generated from proposed annexation area, based upon current developed conditions, is approximately 52,400 per year. 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? The Surface Water Utility will assume ownership and responsibility for the maintenance, operation, and replacement of all storm system infrastructure previously located within public right-of-way or easements dedicated to King County. 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (lf yes, please indicate on the attached map.) Nothing to recommend. General recommendation and comments: �' � `� �� 02.- Signature: , ' Date: S / �j Cc: Lys Hornsby Jack Crumley H:\DI V ISION.S\UTI L►TIE.S\DOCS\2002\2002-159.doc\tb . �� . ,._ _ � - . �� .. .. i� � _ � _ , ,n��c3 _ j�i��Et�i� � �� , � '�'�' . - ,rr.r,lll� '' : �:1�... . „ . 7� �� :="a� ■■ ■��■ ` �• ,� ��.�.�• 1��i �� ,■, ��+�� I�,� .si� , �� iil ■ � 11 ' ,� ' � �� ' ' � " �� r• ' �� i� � , . �� .� � ■ . _ �� _� � �� .�� w�� ;,� -�� • �o�� 71 p �: . � � ��■�� --� ��11 . � ��11� � �� , ; � ■�!�■ � : :: �� : . . J �� .� . �6�� . � ` �"��.�� E�� '-��`��:: i r�r � �% � � s -s s `�: ■ � � �� ..� x��, f f ��`�,.�-.� ��r ■ � � /� � � _ �. � �, �� .� F ��K �,r�� - � �� -- � � �;��.�°`'p� ��`�;z� �� {,�,, �< �� „�� - � 2 �F C 3r- . A F . ; � �� - �� . -� ;. ■ �� ' �� n��?��'�'�€�� !! ��\i�� , � � �� 1 I��D � . �;� ��. � '� �� . ,_ v �V�7►'J. �'ii iriliEl� � IIII; �� F� ��, � �';� � » � � ;L� IL�liij � =�C C �� -'� a ��c'�a z�� e"ss,�'� �� % �� !� t� � ►I/q�� '" '`�� `.� �� r� �ra � '� �I�wl � �� - � s � �� ,�� ' �a fr.� � : � ,� �� - �� ■ �a �a � • �C� � ��h�� , �.,� . F.'� � , � �� `J ''rJ � 1� �� - .. ■ �rtl�� 11 �� .,� ��.--� � . ;!; ;� � .'�F� i� • - �� ■ u� �u u _ : �-� — = w � �� r �1111q� � ", 111� �� ' r� ii • , �"7 � , � � • �� .. — �� .� ��7 �, :�11�� rlll■ ' ' � ��11�!; � �o ��.. �� -� ■„ � ' � ii � , � ,• � � �� : �.,I„'■ �� I' "' ,. �� ■ �� ■��■�� :�� ... �. �� ...� 1 � � � �.� � .� �� •. � , � : �� ,�� ` ' �,y � .■ - � � �� .... �� , .. -�lE'� . � . 1� ►�•.�� i� �■•: � ' �� - ""i � w� ��I�, � 1�111/1. � � ///1�� , �� - : -- ��■i i��d _ �� _ � ��III �!!� �� : �� • � � ' � . � � - . • 1 : 11 • 11 � ' • ��': . • . 11 • r � .. ...� . . ,. . :. .. • ... •� . :� .. . �� i r � . � '� , , / , I • • s � ��w-=�•�Z��1��._1 � '"_""' — . -- '—��[_`...:a�i�r,`s��\1��IL;�1�� •�.�.,.� �� _ �, '" �'"' �` � -- - � _ j� ��r � � � ■� � _ ' _ , �, _ ., � � � �.� �� I , � / � -�/JI. '��....�`��r�It�r��i� �� ■ ' , � � �� --.....�-- .,��,.L��.,L ■ l � . � � �.r�.�cs��„�w,`�_�_ ; ��.�■. , .x ��, � � • � ;; �� ;, ! t , � �� . .t \ � ; ,; � � ,, � � -�-�� ,. � �� -� � �� :� , - `...... ,� �► l� , � #. � ,� . .►-' ... , � , � � '�► � �l � . � � � � � ,, �"�',' 1 r ''.�� ' � ` 1� ,�i� ��l;i � �==s,,.7..��u� , L� �. i �i-• � � �� 1 � �, 1 , ,�. .. ; � - • �' � , ..►�` � � �' 11 � � � �, _: L� sa, . ,♦ � :.►1 �� • r�, � �� 1 "! r.7 ��.,.� Y�. � �:� � � \ � ' � , _.t� ��► # � � ��, ��,;, ` � , � + � ��► ,} �.., � � ��, " I ;� 1 ,; � ,,, , s � � _ . . �IIIIC�111 ; {.�� .� ., � _- II��II . { � 1..�. I !I ` �. � � ;i; ��r r— �_----..i.��..�.. �� ,��i�_ _ 1 � t =�►. �►'�.'��►'��il� �-�-�:-==---��►_ ��-- � � ,, ' ��.� � _- , � �1� � i � "I111 �.,�.,�-� _�_��.--,,,;;r, �� '_'..�-"-- -..�.��. ��,. � � � � �� f�(�.��..�3i�,� � � � � � � � f'� � l � �' �` ,� � �4 �, w � 1 , . t : �. � �.� �l�,_,�� .. � �� 1 , �� ,_ ■ i • r�t� 1 i ' � tL�f �.� �i;��. � — - _ _ , � +�s � � ��E,7 � � � ,�,� , i;!� � /r'� ,. � �; ��,M ��*� �►. i , , ',I,i i � � �� i " • �� . �� w .. �... ��- ,- � 1 �, ,, 1 � � � �� , �_ � � � ! i - 1 � � �. ,��_ , .� ■. � � .M►,, . ►� �� . - .� � -� � ��'�.. ,� -� _-�� _ �� .�--- ��.u..: ;��'�t',�y��; �� 'il��, � i�� ..�z. r � r —, �— ��'��!!� ;� 1 � f. � � _ . �. � � . _ . • _ .�► ► . �� . �! �� . �, �� ,�r � �- � � � � � . � . ��1�� ;�'��,� ' � ` �: �1 1 �f��!� .� ! ; � .,��.,; � �� '1�� -�� , �I � • : s ' ir. ,.� �` ; , ,,;�;. � � .►_r��i��11 .� � � '� 'lil�ll�,;�,;;, � � : �,, _ ��3��►_�+�� 1 1 _ '�,�� .�; �� .... l = ' � ' f � �� '""`- i ,�:,/ ' � .. ' ' �{ " � � .� :- � .. �� 1�.,,�-. .{ � � _ � ,► ��` � � -_�. - r j . - k � ��. A!t►I��i��jl�_��.��1Fc`=_� ��[i�� _.—_��.:�;,.a�'� �� ' ■i�M_.�►�� ti,.��.�.�r��f�►� - ��..�i��a�►��.�...•.�i��:�`_._�_� .. , ., �� , = r� �, CITY OF RENTON � DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION MASTER APPLICATION OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION(cont) Note: If there is more thau on legal owner,please attach an additional notarized EXISTING LAND USE(S): Master application to each owner. 36 parcels with single-family dwellings and 16 parcels that NAME: Various(see attached list) are vacant. ADDRESS: City: ZIP: PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Non-project action. No development is proposed as a TELEPHONE NUMBER: consequence of this annexation. New zoning would allow CONTACT PERSON/APPLICANT approximately 440 dwelling units on this 66.16 acres. NAME: Sarah Slatten NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES(estimated): Not applicable ADDRESS: Cam West Development, Inc. 9720 NE 120`h Place,Suite 100 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Residential Rural Ciry: Kirkland,WA z�P: 98034 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 42,S-H2,S-19SS PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: No chan e ro osed PROJECT INFORMATION EXISTING ZONING: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Residential -4 du/ac (Kin Count ) Shamrock Annexation—60%Petition to Annex PROPOSED ZONING: Residential—5 du/net acre(Cit of Renton) SITE AREA(SQ.FT OR ACREAGE): PROPERTY/PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION and ZIP CODE: 66.16 acres The proposed subject annexation is bounded by the PRo1ECT vALUE: Renton city limits on a portion of the west annexation N/A boundary, on the south(NE 5"' Street, if extended), and on the east (150`�'Avenue SE, if extended). Its narthern IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? boundary is approximately SE 120�'Street, 1f extended. Area is outside of existing city limits and therefore not designated as APA. KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF Multiple. Please see attached list. ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? The northeastem portion of the annexation area includes a portion of desi nated Wetland 17 K. H\EUNSPU'AAULecent Annexations\Shamrock\ShamrockUnaster applicatio�template.doc\d _ _ , rs LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach separate sheet if needed) See attached legal description TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply -- City staff will determine fees. X_ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION _REZONE $ _SPECI.AL PERMIT $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _T�MPORARY PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ _CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _GRADE&FILL PERMIT $ _FINAL PLAT $ (No. Cu. Yds: ) _VARIANCE $ (from Section: ) $ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT $ _WAIVER $ PRELIMINARY _ROUTINE VEGETATION FINAL MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _BINDING SITE PLAN MOBILE HOME PARKS $ SF�ORELINE REVIEWS: _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ _ EXEI�IPTION $ NO CHARGE _ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP — See 60% Petition 1, (Print Name) ,declare that I am(p(ease check one) _the owner of the property involved in this application, the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements aud aoswers herein contained aud the information herewith are in all respects true and conect to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Name of Owner/Represeutative) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(PrinU (Signature of O�vnedRepresentative) My appointment expires: (THIS SECTION TO BE CODIPLETED BY CIT7�'STAFF.) C�ty Filc Numhcr. ECF SA R SHPL CU LLA PP FP TY SP RVMP V AAD �V FPUD SM Sh[E h1HY BSP A CPA 1'OTAL FEES: 25.50 TOTAL POSTAGE VROVIDED:$ H\EUNSI'\PAA\Kecci�t.l��nc.�.itw��s\Shamrock\Shamri,ck\m,utcr:ipphcauun trmplatc d��c\� '- - - - _--- -- i �t �7ZC[i-T-I- --r- - --- — -- - - - - - ---- -- - I ' � " � - ,� �- - - � i S � 11�h �_I �; ```� � ; , I - z - -- -- r�+ `-1--�_�--�,� I � ' � ' -� - -- � � ' +- - - - , � - - �.- � _ � � ; i �' , I � � � _ _� . 1_ _1_ i � ' � 1 � =-- - ' =- l - - - i �- - I � � , „ { , - = - � -- -�.� T �E 1 t I � � I ' o _ - --- � � - --� - - -- - _ �Q — - ,=; �-�- �- -- - � I I � ! ; � ; -- _' --1- !--:_ -- - - � I� -- - ----L- —i � I T �- --- ----- -- -_ � - II, -- --_- -.-, ---- --- --- � � •- �---- i j � - - ----r- -^- -- -- I I � i 1 T S � i �� `� �- � �--lr� �_ _ � �-- -�- - � E 1T'{h St f _ - T —_-- _�_ � 117 h t 1 , `�11 _ __ �,I � I ------ --- ' - ' �----�-- -- -- Q � - o - - - -� � ---- 0 , � -- -- -- SE 120 h S s - � "�' _ �P _��=� ` - :��; $,. r�; ; - y�.; - �`� �_ �� "�,��_ v � - �,LL �-U �;�;��`_�r� `��-� 1 z: �: - <�:-��'::�-:��'.'-��a�i - ==:�s': -_ ��';,t�. --I------ .r-'� �r ''e,.-�,. � �. , �'-+'� —� ' --';�� •�5-- � .��_-_ `'t �,"��sn�. _ j--- - �- � � 3 �12�th�' \�. PI --�- / - � _x'� _�' °+�� -x�� ,. -�r ,'. � � � ��as�� ,'5�,� '_a' � -4 �' -S'.�.�' �-_ I � � ,* .z- t �-� ,� r-, -� a`z.F - _" � a ` � I �Il.� - - S _ 2+a. n "� -��'�'�k --g ,x - `� x ,r.. � � �.. --� h��, � _ � ' �� _ I �il � `� � } ~�` Y � � r� k _s1 � �� - -=s �� , � � � y , �� =.��- -�� - i� I� i � --,-.�,, -- ��_ , I � h PI � _ C _ � m _ � � N h St -' h St S 1 8 z � � ----a - E 1 nd t 2n St SE 13 nd �t — ; � --. — I---�--- \ � ---- � _L i�' � -- - - � 1-� Z - ---- -- � - Q j -- —> ----- —---- � C/7 r--- Q _.__�. --- -- , ----— --------- I � � Proposed Shamrock Annexation o soo 1600 Figure 1 : Vicinity Map 1:9,600 �� Existing Corporate Boundary ��}-�� F,conom�c Developme�t,Neighborhoods&Strategic Plamm�g �,�� SueCarisoq:�dmmuvamr ProposedAnnexationBoundary ,P� � G-Del Rosano F,\,1�� ]une2001 � • . , i � � I � - � - , , I i � - � - - - , -1 - - -- - � - - - - -- - i , i - - ----- - -i- -- - i � --�- - --- - --- --- - ---- ---- - f-- ---;-- - --- ------- - - 1 i \ r-�------�----- - -- I � � , � � ------ - � --�.. .� �.._.. �---- ,' � i 1-- --- ------ - i� i\ `� -- � \ � I --�--- ` , ------- -_---- � , _ �---- --- , r I i � _ -- -------� ', � , -- - ---- � i -- --- � - � -_ , \ ' �\ � � - �-- , ._ i _ _ � - _ � '. , � � --_- -__ � ' � - � � � ---- �-__------ �-- �'- - . _ - _- --_____ � - ,_, � _ __ �----- � - ---- ---�-�1 _ �, -�- -- - _ , r— =-- �— V - _ - � -- � -�---- -- , , �-,- . ---- ----_- _-- i i ,_ , , , � -� , -- ' � - _ � ' � - - - -- -----i �1 =-_- - --_ �. i ', -- , - �, -,,_� - �'. - ��, - � � --- �� i �1 � �� - � I - � , , _- �\ - �� JI `I � - i� I ----, 1\ , � �' _ - - -- __� --- ti I � ��.,»�* \\� I " \�� <�`� ) � � �� l" � � - L— l , - y�! I �� h�---f � --- --- ) � I I � / �/ f--� - l. � � � _j � F--- � ( \� I \ � - � ` _ � � ` � - � _ - -, _. I I � `� �- -- - ____ I 0. Proposed Shamrock Annexation o 300 600 Figure 3: Topography Map - 1m�nterval Contour 1 .3�6�� ,�Y �� ExisUng Corporate Boundary ��^�,�, Econoiruc Developmen;,Neighborhoods Rc Strategic Planntng �'�� Sue Carl�on,Admm��tratnr � Proposed Annexation Boundary ? (, Del Rusano �F.'V�i�� 4 June�00; . . -_ ` SHAMROCK EXPANSION AREA PROPERTIES 2001 Assessments January 25,2002 Parcel# Parcel# Major Minor Owner Land Value Improvement Value Total Value Parcel opting in Comments 0 102305 9030 Palanchuk,Georgiy 8 Natalya $ 140,000 00 $84,000.00 $224,000.00 $224,000.00 received 102305 9259 Powers,Jack&Dense $ 62,000.00 $113,000 00 $175,000.00 $175,000.00 received 102305 9319 Shamrock Highlands LLC $ 116,000 00 $50,000 00 $166,000.00 $166,000.00 recerved 102305 9021 Wegner,Brett&Mark $ 78,000.00 $151,000 00 $229,000 00 $229,000.00 received 112305 9092 Dubuski,Darryl $ 67,000 00 $128,000.00 $195,000.00 $195,000.00 af Renton 112305 9010 Jarvis,Jerry $ 80,000 00 $31,000 00 $111,000.00 $111,000 00 at Renton 102305 9022 Shamrock Highlands LLC $ 151,000.00 $123,000 00 $274,000.00 $274,000 00 received 102305 9026 Bashary,Shay $ 78,000 00 $37,�00.00 $1 t5,000 00 $115,000 00 received 102305 9170 Hodge,Harold D $ 67,000 00 $124,000 00 $191,000 00 $191,000.00 received 102305 9174 Shamrock Highlands L�C $ 98,000.00 $157,000.00 $255,000 00 $255,000.00 recerved 102305 9415 Shamrock Highiands LLC $ 156,000 00 $0.00 $156,000.00 $156,000.00 received 112305 9078 Tomlinson,Eric&Autumn $ 57,000.00 $79,000 00 $136,000.00 $0.00 NO 1�2305 9075 Engh,Dale 8 Mary(Parke Owner) $ 57,000 00 $81,000 00 $138,000.00 $6.00 NO 102305 9�91 Shamrock Highlands lLC $ 88,000.00 $115,000.00 $203,000.00 $203,000.00 received 102305 9031 Shamrock Highlands LLC $ 114,000.00 $0.00 $114,000.00 $114,000.00 received 102305 9042 Phung,An T $ 161,000 00 $139,000.00 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 received copy 102305 9069 Lai,Man-Ling $ 104,000.00 $0.00 $104,000.00 $104,000.00 received 102305 9384 Shamrock Highlands LLC $ 98,000.00 $178,000 00 $276,000 00 $276,000.00 received 102305 9383 Martin,Kenneth $ 114,000.00 $173,000.00 $287,000.00 5Q.60 NO 1 12305 9067 Nguyen,Ngoc $ 57,000.00 $94,000 00 $151,000.00 $Q.00 NO 112305 9091 Ellis/Dream Craft $ 114,000 00 $18,000.00 $132,000.00 56.Op haven't received 102305 9038 Koch,John&Patricia $ 62,000.00 $88,000 00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 received '102305 9355 Kelly,Bryant&Nuiko $ 62,000 00 $62,000 00 $124,OD0.00 $124,000.00 received 112305 9031 Scott,Sharon EI¢abeth $ 109,000 00 $127,000.00 $236.000 00 $0.00 NO 102305 9341 Gilbert $ 62,000 00 $128,000 00 $790,000 00 y0.00 NO 102305 9070 Metcalfe,William $ 57,000.00 $81,000 00 $138,000 00 $Q.00 NO 273920 003D Munro,Richard 8 Barbara $ 20,000_00 50.00 $20,000 00 3Q.60 NO 273920 0020 Bowen,Ralph Jr &Branda $ 57,000 00 $0.00 $57,000 00 $57,000 00 received 273920 0010 Bowen,Ralph Jr &Branda $ 57,000 00 $0 00 $57,000 00 $57,000 00 received 273920 0160 Kingston,Chariie&Stacy $ 57,000 OD $114,000.00 $171,000.00 $171,000 00 received 273920 0150 Kristoferson,Richard $ 57,000 00 $0 00 $57,000 00 $57,000 00 received 273920 0140 Knstoferson,Richard $ 57,000 00 $0 00 $57,000 00 $57,000 00 recerved 273920 ODJO Munro,Richard&Barbara � 57,000.00 $103,000 00 $160,000 00 50.00 PJO 273920 0130 Bowen,Ralph Jr 8 Branda $ 57,000 00 $9`s,000 00 $150,000 00 $150,000 00 received 273920 0170 Hammond.James 8 Enka $ 57,000 00 $95,000 00 $152,000.00 ��7.00 undecided 273920 0260 Riley,John $ 57,000-00 $0 00 $57,000.00 $0.00 undecided 273920 0050 Flattum,Particia $ 57,000 00 $108,000.00 $165,000 00 50.00 NO 273920 0120 Flattum,PaRicia $ 57,000.00 $0.00 $57,000.00 5�7.00 NO 273920 018D Repenn,Rodger $ 57,000 00 $100,000 00 $157,000 00 $0.00 undecided 273920 0250 Repenn,Rodger $ 57,000.00 $32,000.00 $89,000.00 3Q.OQ undecided 273920 0060 Larson,James&Glona $ 57,000.00 $77,000.00 $134,000 00 30.00 NO 273920 0110 Donald Sikes $ 57,000 00 $0.00 $57,D00 00 �0.00 NO 273920 0190 Halfhill,David&Susan $ 57,000 00 $94,000.00 $151,000 00 $151,000 00 recerved 273920 0240 Repenn,Rodger $ 57,000 00 $0 00 $57,000.00 �0 00 undecided 273920 0071 Hohibein,Enk 8,Michelle $ 57,000.00 $105,000 00 $162,000.00 $0.�0 NO 273920 0100 Sikes,Donald Jr 8 Cindy $ 57,000 00 $96,000 00 $153,000 00 �,�0 NO 273920 0200 Sharkey,Douglas $ 57,000 00 $96,000.00 $153.000 00 $153,000 00 received 273920 0230 Sharkey,Douglas $ 57.000.00 $0 00 $57,000.00 $57,000 00 received 273920 0080 Bietka,Ronald $ 57,000 00 $93,000 00 $150,000 00 $150,000 00 received 273920 0090 Bielka,Ronald $ 57,000.00 $0-00 $57.000 00 $57,000 00 received 273920 0210 Sharkey,Douglas $ 57,000.00 $0 00 �57,000 00 $57,000.00 received 273920 0220 Sharkey,Douglas $ 57,000 00 $0 00 $57,000 00 $57,000 00 received Total $7,421,000.00 $4,593,D00.00 60% $4,452,600.00 DeficienU Over -$140,400.00 . + � sx��Roc�ArrrrrxA�rloN LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South half(ll2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter and the North half(1/2) of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the South half(1/2) of the North half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10, EXCEPT the North 132 feet thereof; AND the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, of Section 11, Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,King County, � Washington. . •- f � � � i - � --�-----=-- - - -- -- i � ,_ � I --------i - - - -- ---------- ---- � -- � - ----------- i - - - - --- I ------ Ir---- 1 � , � --- ' -- .�� -----__-- ------_--�� --� _ _ _�--__-_- - �_-- I . -----_- _ __ ________ ___ _______ _� ; � . -_ I _ - - -_---�--_-_-- � :� . _ _ �� _�`\�� -_-_ I " �r'`t ___- ,� _-._ - �- ____.--_ - -- I - "_T--_- L -___- ___-----�___ __---__ �--- __-__-__-`_-�-___--_ � �� • . �� i � � i - � i , �-__--_ - - - - --_ - _ ,�----- -_ ; - -_- - --- i - � -- -�-- - i � - - � I --_ """-r-- � i ,- -- - r--- i � _- , �_ . .� �-_ � � i , � ------- I-- _l: , : , _-_ i -�---_--�--_-� � -- I ' ' � r ' j � ---i i I -- � i i i I ; � , � , � Proposed Shamrock Annexation o soo 1600 Figure 5: Sensitive Areas Map 1:9,600 ,,. } �, Econunuc Devclopmen[,Ne�ghborhoods&Strategic Plannmg —..— DitCh 2nd/Of Str28m ��s Existing Corporate Boundary �; �� $ue C�arL.on,Aclm�msVator '��r c; I'�i k°`°"° � Wetlands � Pro osed Annexation Bounda F�,.�p 4)unc_nUl P ry __ - - ----- - -- - - - � - -- - - - - -- - --- - � � ! - � - � ! - - � , ;----- }- - - I � --- - � - ❑ -- --- - - - � I - - - - -- ----- -- � -- I �_ � i - - - C� -- � ; - ---- ❑ � �� I -o- i° -,---- r -- -� � � ° � � ' i ---- fi -- - -�- ----�------�----- ---- -- --- - --- - - - -- -- ------ -- ----- ----, � i � I � d d � �-� _� � — ---- ------ � o ---- ------ ----- � ❑ � � � � - -- -------- � � ----- * � --- � � - a - � 1 � � �' � � � � -- � � � � s � � -------�-- --- � — � � � _._-- . �--.- � � �-- � �-`��- --- . ❑r� � � - -- � --- ------ --- ------�__:--_-_-_---------_ , -- � -��-- _ , � � - � 4 �° . "� - - Q � ■ � — -- � �' _ � � � Q a Q ---n---- -- � � I I --- � � � 4 r--- � � � ------ � --f o - p �7 Q ' ' ° � o ' � 0 -- o � j Q; � � � i � � � , ; o , � Proposed Shamrock Annexation o 300 600 Figure 4: Existing Structures Map � ExistingStructure 1:3,600 �� Existing Corporate Boundary J�Y o Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strateg�c Plannmg ,;��, s�e car��n,nd,�,��sua�or � Proposed Annexation Boundary G Del Rosano �l v:�uZ J 1une2UUl Annexation Review Form - Shamrock Annexation (60%) ( ) 10% Notice of Intent /(X) 60% Annexation Petition TO ; Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM ; Don Erickson, AICP / Senior Planner Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT : Proposed Shamrock Annexation Location ; Generally north and west of the existing city limits north of NE 4'h Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 150'h Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. Date Circulated: 03/08/02 Comments Due: 03/19/02 General Information Area : 66.6 acres Street length ; 0 Assessed Value : $6,829,000 Estimated Population ; 65 Current Uses Residential : + 20 dwellings, majority of area vacant Commercial ; N/A Industrial : N/A Public : Streets only, Comp Plan : Resource Conservation Designation Future Uses; : Singie family Future Po ulation � Est, 480 ersons 260 homes ? Reviewing Department/Division: �,�,'L l. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? ��C�C 1�.��-��2�7�1 .��/I�`Z/.�J� �it� , � � � t � 2, Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? _,.-, �'`�G'fC l� � �Gt'i�� C�•c:C.�C�7ce,T �� ;�Zz-c�0 C��ZF'G�,,�e C ��. , MAR T � 200� co�-zr, ,,��e, �.. 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? 4, What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? a � �� h��`�� , ��, /�c.�I ,�-�-�e��- se.�c� ��-,c� �� G�,.�l-� ��1 �-c� ��?� �� c�� , 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a resuit of this annexation? ��r�2.�'�-� /� c/ � .�-�� -�-� �'� Q��?�.c/lac a ��' w�-�'1. ��l ��z�c�v1� . G(,n�Ic, �C��II� �� .� �s7L% 6. Would alternate b ndaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, piease indicate on the attached map,) n/� General recommendation and comments: C' c� �l�M .� �� w��: �fZ�� z,-yz u�7�G��c-�� j ��C ...-��7� G��czZ�-P , �,�1� trc�1 ��c� c�e 7`�-� � G�!��c�f-�c �� c-�--�at c c�S?� , Signature; ate: ��- �:, . CITY OF RENTON ,.t� Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Planning 7 e Tanner,Mayor Susan Carlson,Administrator March 18,2002 Mark Holland Pacific Land Consulting 13619 Mukilteo Speedway,Suite 603 Lynnwood,WA 98037 SUBJECT: RECENT STATE SUPREME COURT DECISION REGARDING ANNEXATIONS BY PETITION Dear.Mark: In light of last week's Supreme Court decision regarding annexation by the petition process,the City of Renton has suspended activity on all annexations using this process until clarification is received by us on how to process existing and new annexations. Since the Shamrock Annexation is by petition, it is one of eight City annexations that are affected by the Court's decision. We will inform you as soon as we receive definitive information on how to proceed. Thank you in advance for your patience as we try to resolve this matter. Sincerely, � ✓ Don Erickson,AICP Senior Planner cc: Rebecca Lind ��"� R E N T O N 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 �This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U R V E Annexation Review Form - Shamrock Annexation (60%) O 10% Notice of intent (X ) 60%An�xafilon Petition � , � TO : Building Surface'.V�/atert�tilitY Fire Water Utility ``��—�_., Parks Wastewat��ilit�r Police Tr nsportation 8 �1I2 Public Works Maintenance C ,rrent Plar�raing- FROM : Don Erickson, AICP / Senior Planner � Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Plannin� SUBJECT : Proposed Shamrock Annexation Location : Generally north and west of the existing city limits north of NE 4'h Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 150'h Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. Date Circulated: 03/08/02 Comments Due: 03/19/02 General Information Area : 66.6 acres Street length : 0 Assessed Value : $6,829,000 Estimated Population ; 65 Current Uses Residential : ±20 dwellings, majority of area vacant Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : Streets only. Comp Plan ; Resource Conservation Designation Future Uses: ; Single family Future Po ulation Est, 480 ersons 260 homes Reviewing Department/Division: L� l. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? , ) /V � 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? l � ��v (Over) 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? � 5 4. What addif�i�ial facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �D'�-�' 5, Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currentiy owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? u'� ►"(� 6, Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map,) �� General recommendation and comments: � � Signature: ' � ti Date: � � �� -z�.,, � FEB 1 3 2002 � . I ECONOMICDCI'F:LiJP1�pf.';� King County SCOt Nr��sc��,;oc; i. € Department of Assessments - King County Administration Bldg. Assess�r 500 Fourth Avenue,Room 708 Seattle,WA 98104-2384 (20�296-5195 FAX(20�296-0595 Email:assessor.info@metrokc.gov wwtiv.metrokc.gov/assessor/ ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted January 31, 2002 to the King County Department of Assessments by Donald K. Erickson, Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to Renton of the property described as the Shamrock Annexation, has been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers and assessed value of property listed thereon carefully compared with the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to be sufficient under the provisions of the Revised Code of Washington, Section 35A.01.040. The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signatures on the petitions are valid through comparison with any record of actual signatures, nor that the signatures were obtained or submitted in an appropriate timeframe, and this document does not certify such to be the case. Dated this 7� day of February, 2002 � ! t ..� �t{ ,!/._�_.-�,r i_�t f � l 7 r Scott Noble, King Co nty Assessor �� January 25, 2002 Donald Erickson, Senior Planner Renton City Hall—6t" Floor 1055 South Grady Way . Renton, WA 98055 � RE: Shamrock Annexation Petitions Dear Mr. Erickson, • The letter is in regards to the Shamrock annexation application and the signed petition forms. It appears we have reached the 60% signature requirement based on the 2001 and 2002 assessed values we obtained from our title company. The following property owners have signed the petition agreement: Shamrock Highlands LLC (7 parcels), Palanchuk, Powers, Wegner, Bashary, Hodge, Phung, Lai, Koch, Kelly, Bowen (3 parcels), Kingston, Kristoferson(2 parcels), Halfhill, Sharkey(4 parcels), Bielka(2 parcels). Please note that Andy Phung, owner of parcel 1023059042, sent his petition to the city council address,which is listed on page one of the petition form. Currently, I have a copy from him. If you have not received the original by the end of the day today we will arrange to get another signature from him and then deliver to you. Based on our conversation yesterday, the signed petition forms from Jerry Jarvis and Darryl Dubuski have been delivered to you. In the event we receive additional signed petitions next uveek, it is our assumption you will accept them as long as they are received prior to the February 2, 2002 deadline. Please let me know if this asstunption is incorrect. Enclosed is the following information for your review: 1) One original copy of all signed petition forms as previous listed (except for the Phung petition, copy). 2) One copy of the property owner and tax assessment information for each parcel from Transnation Title Co. 3) One spreadsheet including the property owner, tax id, and assessment value for 2001 to show our current standing. 4) One spreadsheet including the property owner, tax id, and assessment value for 2002 to show our current standing. We look forward to progressing to the next level and eventually annexing into the , � � , city. Please advise CamWest of any future deadlines, meetings, or hearings �� :� � . � : . � associated with the Shamrock annexation. Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please call me at (425) 825-1955. Sincerely, Sara Slatten CamWest Development, Inc. enclosures , � � • �� - . :� , . � , ; � -:� Y �- PETITION TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 (60% Petition - Shamrock Annexation) TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60%) in value according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of real property located contiguous to the City of Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description(Exhibit 2) are included as part of this petition. In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14.120 on . The City Council then determined that the City would accept the proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree to: (1) Submit the 10%Notice of Intent Petition as an intent to annex; (2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the subject property; (3) Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan designations as they affect the subject property; and (4) Assume their proportional share of the pre-existing City bonded indebtedness. all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. WHEREFORE, the undersigned property owners petition the City Council and ask: (a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and (b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the above described territory to become part of the City of Renton, Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force, and to receive City public services. Page 1 of 2 � ' �This t�vo pa�e fQrm is r,ne of�.numb�r c��`ccl��ntical for-ms which comprise ane petition seeki.ng fhe atulexation �f tl�e �esc�'ii�ed terreturv to the �ity af�elzton, ti'Vashin.gton a� above stated, and tnay be filed wit�i oth�r p��i�;es c��+tagr►x�w; additz��nal signatures. �{',�R1VI1!'G: Evety��rsart u�ho sig�s this petitia��r ��itlt atay�t�aer tl�c�n lai�s c�r�i�er tru�name,or wlao kno�vingly sign�mor�e t�aa�z �ra�af these,�e��t�e`�''=he ar�esis�tAt�e��is�rrot qr�uli�ed to szg�h or xlanr slce is +iat a legal vot�r, nr si,�ris a petiti�an »�akc•s h�rei�r esn.y f+�lse str�tc'rfrent, tiFiUI��8 gdLSlt�[►,�lt 1tdFSdCBIPt['.t7il'@Y. The undersa��,ed h��r� read �the above petiti�n �nd c;onsent to bk�� ft�zn°c��this petitiaz�. (�ya»��s�,,f�rtiti�ners s�leould he�ira ide�rtira!far►n as+'hr sanxe ti�at rtpt��ear un rec�r+l iyz the chain of title to the��eal estate.J - -------'� ��—�-�� Tax L�t Legal i�10 �� :'�taiting I�esce�►ptioa Si IY��u�'� i��3d 1C.oc,43�oc, 1 �.` ��s Piat,Assess�r's � ��il�Y�l'� i��llE' —,,,_. — _ p��e No.oR-ot��rr ..,_. � � �(��..30 5 �0`-1-� � �. �P�E��- Q�33 --57�� ' 9 1. � I 26Ib`� M,�(�;(-}-4-a w�- ��Z Z �____._____� �_...�.. — � i I �. 3. �. 5. � _..�_. . ___ ► _ ..�.__ ._________ _.�__ ______. �____.�.------i 6. � �_ _ __..�.f_____.....__ _ .,._.____ . � �, � __ _ __.�� ____._ .__._ _ � .__-- �. �, I _� .�.r _ _--i 10. Ya�;e 2 af 2 .� � . . �.�9...ir.��r,i'�t�Y��i ,�� A�.i !i�TiiJ�. r3�� r�A��A{{ �3r�i+,A+� 1.�,/1j �.A-J.L S 1�4.�...' \ �...'rl�r.�.�f.�. ��i,��'�'� ��.�� .�'�� 0°io P��iiicr{ - I:,.iS� R�r:Ecan �'1�ti.�e:,tE Ar;rcxa;ii��'_;'� -�c�: ��. �:�x�a��r i�t��.;�t��:�. r�r��as. ��i��'�� :�-.��t7:� ��?()i� .�1t;'.? :��,�.>>.�e `�in�ch , :��:rr,u��., Vv'.�. �:3,�Q7� Ti,< � ric�.t51�,necl :��'� c�ti�r�.t•S c�ti IIOt lt'.�35 tt��+r� SIXCy t)eruC'rlt (�tl�ol•i:1 �'��it:t �� ';�,: 's � ` !�� it:e ii5�[;bSL(� ��:1�i�i:C.C�I`1 t+7T' F�Cif.'1�1.� ti3�idC3tl�l� �l[ TC.i3� �)S"Uj)�:1"C�' �OC:I�C.f�Ct�1�C��UUUS til% IalL C��I'v �iI �rt;�1CU[7. ti�'�� !Y�r�:;i�y pr:t�.ti�r� tti>it s-�t:f� pr��{��rty 1:�:. �nnex�,�to t��e C;ty��t`R��.�tc�n uiid�.-;�. ,I�e pz•��visions c7: I�C'��% 3Sf`..1�� L'�{�e`t seu. '�I'xze eerritoz'y p.r�poser.� to Lie. ,,�,r�exe.�J.is w�tl�in i��i:v C'ount5�, «r<<si�in�t�i�, and ;s c:��nti�;ua�r; �a �"`� � ' ��lll�JI til�. C�.I.CV <)t RE=t1W.1. ,1 Iil:l� �1'_X�71f.)1t i 1 U;1C: �Cti'��-1 UC3�_.i��C1�J[1 �f.J:�)fE�A! :./ :�i"l. 11iCJ1.li1Cl1 �i� tlti� p�:iitiot7. �i►1 �e�pt�nse- �� t�uly +ilt-.i ,tiiic� ct��si�ierer� "'.V,��zic�� e�f�I��t�r.tii��" E<7 �c�rr��t; r�� 3im.:Ya!ic��l j�,l��cec�iii��:,, tl�� l":'�t�, �.:-:�u�i�il ��t tt�t�., l:ity ��kenton me: :v�t�, t�z� i��t:atir�� ?�zr.��.; un�ae.r x.�'�V �i5A.`_-#,12i) ��t (Jc��b�.r l�", l'.:)��. T�i�i (.'i«� t=:��srtcil th�.n dctt�rt:�incd itta� ;h� C.ity �;��c�uld �cc�:.pt ti�i�. pr�i�p��set, <�i�nexat:c�n. C�u��l�ac?�, k�;ir'��ttant te� R�:��'�' 35.�'�.1�-.�20, tt�e u��lers�i;��d ��e�itica►��,r� tS�C��, i�]: {�} SlI�ITll? t�1L- l��c� it1Ut7Cc.' O� �{'':.:Q? f�;;:1Cll)?7 aS illl lI10E,IlL 1C,'� .3Y11i�X; {�� ;�C;CP,�.�t ll"?�� (�1tV':i :ill�ii.l:[�lt�c:OCl� 1t�U()'1(1',} ;lt "I.,Oi:it1�7 L�'�,1,11�it10115 ic)2' (;� Stl�)�ZCi ��l"J�t:I'CV; (;;j �'�cc�pt t�-�e City's C<�rnt�reherrsive �'�an desr��i�ati�ri� ��s tr�e�y z��tc�cr t�ie sul��j�;cC �;r��ert}�: an4 � ' (�-F1 r`�ssu�nc; �1-��;ir pr��:�o�-tia;ial si�.bre of the�7c:.-�.�:ist��n�;f'il�v{��r�cl�.1 in�teL�te�lness. :i�� iiti 11U� � , '�1� R?JIl1l1�C'�S O� tit't�: ��Jlil;i''� Ili:f'I13��; c`lil(� Cpi1t�31�iL'�l li] X�1i. �'�CCtC'Oillr: ?'�COi'C�lllkr C;(' rSL`I,:i^I il3i'�,��il�', 1,�'�1F:t�I;I�()I2l:, t�.c'. +.�;+�:;z��:�n�cl pr��;�ert� c7��n;�i�ti [��'ti*:ott the Cit:� �'c�t;�i�?: c�.i�i� ati4�: , ;,ai "I�1i��t tL�� t.'�ty C��un.cil f�ix � �ate t��r a �:��_��,1,:, t,earin��, .�z�out su4 i pr��7o�e�c# «��r�exati�an, r,wuyc a r�otit:� to �f�� ct�lisY,ecC �n��a pu:�t.�:��, ;i�t'l�{tVl:`;�' tilt�; �iTl1� .�Ln/:� })�(ii;C D�� `�lll'kl �lc,�i]'tll�, c I�� lC1V10EI1�, ;i�i �g�.:�=_;s�ns �v��c, tiire zt1Ct rr�stc:d �� :12:��:��r� �it �l��e hearin.�, ctrd st�le tl;�°ir fi�3��YC7V:i� �`f'iliStiC)(}i'()\-�:� sl°t Sll(�t1 tilill�lC�lttO?]{.1C :C7 :?:iiC a.11�.'.`itiOl:ta; ti;l'�.� �;�1 lr�it :17��f:�il''lliu ci,ti:�1 �]!'�if]C:`',� i':1(: �.i1S1:il5tl.'R� 1b?:}'l �i6'!'S% �:})f.}PO�.'i:� i)ti i�'M.0 , k��-�,..��;ja R:v��°.,;v �t��ird, ihe C'ity C-_>u��;,�1 ;+� c�t'uir�,an�:_ it��E;x t}-a�� `�2�)(1« Cj� ..."'1�3C� '.C:'1�.'li.l`C� Cli E�'.;i,(_�ITi� �'::.i' �)i if;Z � :�i�' :)� 1?t:=1�0I;, `Yr ;S±?;t"I �iOCi, 5L!}')�Ct: :i; 1�S ��?.1'v�i :il�:J U�';�ill'clllCry �i�i:C; �llll� �.�"1t�4�:.`:t�Il',i' ;.17 Itii`t:�;� i;li(� it) L�C:%1'v`i: ��liy �l�,i:��1C ��r"1rfC`_`'y. 1��1!?':` � 0� � � ' �� j }itS 'i+�i.� �1 `.'i; 'IUIS"Il <<l�s; iS �Jllk; �;f 2i I;UTt1�;�." �� (��t:� ti �Ut`llli ','tf'f(.'�1 CdCjlj)1I5L �Jt2� IJ�'iTt1C)I' St��:1;' �t]�'� :11]t1C:'�.�I�i)?1 l;� l�i�; i��SC,i7Fi:,l� [�_! �� :_�;.� .i�) '��1C� f�.lt�� )��a�-i110T'C, ��:i:;}illlt��Ft?�1 u4 a�JOVt� ,l'c11ti.:3, .�.1'iC� lll::ltJ �"tt' riitCG �'I''.:17 i)tlll'•t i1�!��; t,�::llrllliii]�? :±C.'.(�]CIi'!Il%!f :ii�1]�1C11Iti.' , bf':;d�'.�WA��f.;; �:��ery�er-.;��u ��r��a��rh�iw ll�v's,�etil'so�a it:r,, uny vtjr�r,�•�li�'t:i ni.ti r►r fi, �� tr,�e n¢��ac�, ur tivrar� k�rnti��i�r�Z,v ��;��s trz��r�ttt«rr ��r�e �}�ilte,;t��rett�ei��tt�,, ,ib�rt�ez periti�ri �v�ekirt�a��e�l��ctitr�t when 1te ur� � �,�r�F �� i,�t�r if��<�l y��ter, r��•�sig�rs a;rert'itivr�r. w�aE�x� �r.: ,�.�°slir� is ut�zt�t-r,�:se rt�t yu�rdir+-�d fo sigra, or� w rU � �nc�lt��,i l�cre�,�,frt iut_y fal,s� :�t�et2�rre►rt, �shr.Tll f�;' _ ��%1��Y o��rt �n�s�eferrtea�a-or�, }.i1C UC:ijCJ'filS�rli:t,� �'.'.�il�"(' i:�i1G�.�}'lE: 3L�1: .., �:vii ':t�ll; :��.:'ll'1�:'Ill [S) �OL ��!�Ili� Uf i�ll; I�I:�IC�i�)(',. (;ti'(1fldC'.1'J,f pE'l':tURei'3 S'�10i�1��;tie' �.'1 trE�P;7Itf:ll,JdY/�t U51tlP S!!ltJl'f�tltt tlfifJC�lf JI2�If't�U1'!�i IPl Lfle't�l(lllt tJ�:[l�f'!U 1�6: �'e:tfl��':SiQIE'.} ......_....__.. ._........._.__. . _._._.__---'-- _...,___....._.-- - .'_—-- .....,_--.. .___-__. _ .___ . _. � ..____.__._r..---._ ..._..._.. . .• _. - �___ � -- � �':'tti 1�l.l� l.t`f;=1� �it�. i � i ' ;�Iail�r��. ' �){�5ca�i�7Ei�,�i e+��tt�tit."r.��at(i ; . � ,�, , .,;r . { ;:.>. , ,,..:tt�; » i 4 .,, , r, �.__. . ' _ ; ' , , i /�X �CLT� � ' � � l.�� K � ��s �3� �� s�c�� ; , ' l . i �.�i�< < � M�- v��9Sa�� ' ll2�a�-��la�o`�; ' C� ' . . � � , ..__. ! � � i 1 �" i ; I . : ._ __ _ a .__.______.._____ t_._�._ _�--_.. — —__.. _r.. _ ; � , � , ' � t � � � i , __. _. __ _.._. - --_ .� _ __ ___.__ ; __._ _ —..._.___. _. _ _ _.� _ : � , --___ ; , � ; , � i j i ; � ' ____.___.� � ,__- _.___,__ .__ _ � .___. __ .___._.. . _ _. _ ; � _ _ ,_ _. ._ - --- _ ; , 1 � � � j i i � ! i � ' -----� � ' . � , _ _ _ ___ ; . _ . _ __.�� __ __ .__._._ ___ _ —.--_.._.�.. _-- -. - ----------- - ______�__.___,_______ ! ! � ' � F�. ; _ � j #� _�_._� _ .__��_ .___ ___�-__..�____------__ ---__ _._ . ___ _- ._ _____ ___. ,_. _ _._ ___ ___. �__-----1 �. � ' ,. � !� _ ___ _-�---__ ._ _ _ ..,.. . __ .__ , �_ __...__ _. � _____ _---__. _-----______ +� _ ._. __ _ ____- _� ; -- --t _. � . i � , + �Y � � � � i � � � ; ; f i I i ' ! ._ _._ ___ ____ __. . _._ _._.__u_.._ � __._.._ _...___ __,.,.. .____ _._.. __ ....___ _...-_ . __ . _�._.._._. . .. _ ___ _. __. i.��. . ._� � r � I I + i � � � { I ; ; ; � ' --,____.�__.__.__._�_____�____.____._.: � . . --.-_____._ .. __.... �_ ._ L__.____._.______ .._ __ .._..—--___ .__._ . _ ;�'a�,c;2 :7f' .�„ ... .��'��•ril. A.r�.,��.: 9i �P�4� �.._' '��.�'1� ,� �� ,�Y.E.A,�1 ��,� Er ��+I ��11��.�� +��.L�Y.L.^�I.S'^,. ��,��r �J�L�..�^�.Y.,Y/7J tt`)t;'�i: l�'�ilflt?ri -i:;.3S2 l�s.°:1tUn �-��i1'_e;il1 r'�:ilIli'Xat1Ut1} ��c�: r�-��; c;r��,� ��o�!�<_�r�. c��, ��-�r�: c_��.�� c�r� �:�,;�v�rc�:a :,'t)t.i �"�1tI1 ��,�nu:, `��,t.tt�� l;c,rltt,n, `�b'�i �;�5J5� ��1i', it�lC'�i:'1"�]`!iit:'l`� .ii';, ':��4'l.l�l"ti f�i Tl(1C icSs L�::.tl Sl!LI}' z*)c�.i'C:,f:L +�f��4C�)'l:ry �'��I..IC'. �lf'l'UCCl1T:;? L't7 ��lf' :iStiC iSCtl �'�?�llt3lt�1�1 _C�f�C11�'Ciil uiX�itl�i?l.. t�l'T'ti3J �C'i?rJE:S"l�, ftJc:��rtl�CC)l1Ci�;11'l1ll� �,',' f t1C' �;i�' i]3��.G'II�JIl. LVe l,crthy �,tuti�ior: tFtat SI.1G11 �1T�O�1t;ilV be �.�.r,�aL�:cc�to :h�• G►ty:>i Rentun t�nc��:r �he t'�i��vi�ions ot R(�:1� 3��.. ��.1?,('t e� sec�. 'l,�}�e tert�i.tti�ry propt�;��d �:.� bc. �z��ttc;x�t� i� ��itY:rn k.;r.��C.`��ar7lv, Wasl�i��;�c�:a, �dric? �s uu;��i�t�ous to it?l' `l_�.l:ij C?��it111U11. �L 23��t�7 ��"�Yj�:i�.t �) �T?Ci ii:`r;d; CiC:�;;:,�Jilt)1� �+I.,'"}'ilI'?t �'j �'i.it; �ii,�.;i!ICIt:� �i� �71i', (:lI i�}11S �?+.:.i1t1011. Tt2 �f:S�jL�.1S19 ll) �l C�11�`d tl��`.'CI it�Zu COIi51C1L'CCC2 ��(JZ''Cr:r)��j[I�C:Ii(ll)Il�� TL) i'i:f;lltTlk'.r1Ct:. 3Fi!"tr Xi1rTOI'l �;rc�c��ci�:sgs, �he i'it�� (::'�:�ur,�il c�i�the �.:i�y oI'hr•i�tor� n�� :tll t:�e +nitic:ltin� i�a�:t;e� ur:dc:r E.'""Gi' �5�1.?�.120 �n C�ct�,acr i', 19��. 1'ne C.ity��'�.�t�n�.�z( ttier� ifererrnine�l t4�,�� thN C'it�{.� �vc��ilc� ac�:��t ti�e p.rc��c.�yeci «i:rze.Yatior�. ��urtn<�i', ��t.r��.riartC tc� !�C��J _i.`��.1�,�2,0, tI�e t.r.cl.e��:7r�cci pe;titic��,:�s a�,r�.� t�>�. �1;� ��il��mit t}�e lOz>c '��c�r:ic�; ut lntent Fct�tiort as ,.�r� intc,-nt to an+�c.; >> r�::C��I 11iG r:`\`',y iT)�l:iC�ll'.'.','v'ii;� ;.li1U l:lOI' l)� Z,i?l`It: � ft�?C� ('3 t' � - � '.,€. � i �El .l1� �UC ,i� :i12f��eC! �rti�lti`[}'; ��'r ,��,cce�;t tlt�� C'ity':; C�rnpreFier�siv�. Pik�� dr;si��tioi�s as th�.,°v ar't'e�t tl�L. sul;jer�t ��ra�.�erty: and ' . t��) �ssumc tt��ir pr��r+�rtior�a! _,h�tre�C�� -�x�s�tin�r Cit�; f��r�aecf inci€;f�tcclr�ess. a1� t�s nu�;�i ;� tl�e n.�ir.utes c�f ttt��":'uur.ciI rn�e,ti�� and eunta�rtc°�3 iti t��e. e-Ic:ctr,�,ric xe.:otairt�>i.zt Sta�:�•� ��te�� «'��",K�:�'��'1�:, LlIES t111C�1'F3l�T1�'Cl �1�J�CIiV tJ'.'vllf.'l"� i;E�1tIC�(i �}1!' (,1?V I,�UL:',]C)� :il]Ci :i��i' (�i; �I'}„�t t��; Ci�� i;o;�t-_�il �ax a �at+� tc�r�: ��«blic ra�ai�in; .�t��ur ;ucf� ��scipu�er�. ti�tr�e�ati��n, c:i��e a ri�;ti..e� to 1�c p�al�lisE'�cd .i�id �7c>�t�:d, �rat°.::rt�r�i,i�; t�rc, t:rne az��i �I;�c:�e of�u�1i ;:l::ir�n��, ;anc� in�;z�ii�� ::�;1. �c:�:c�ns tiv1�o ar��int;:�'�.st�.� tu ��pr.�,r i�i tr7c ;�c.��itii� ar:ci �eat,. tl��e�:� :lEl�?CC1�:!`t t31' Cji`.ii1�7�1'C1V:if O� SU�'il �i,1lRi:X'c1I1Cr:i i.il' :i�t <:l'i�C i�lis:5`i(i►l5; iiiii: `i?i 1.��3[ 1''i:;��)'tii'li?:a �i,lt..±, �1C�U�;i1�„ t��i(_�Li)1�1:.<>:'.a'Il� `.��1_t�'i �jS'l�' i��.)tliC)�'�ill �`J�4' i.�"If: _ . Y'il"iI.1t1(�ctl'�4 l��'`r�c:',�� .�l( �+t-(j, t11e �,i�.� �.�.:�.:f!C;1� f)V iJli.t111t1fICC'. i7Ili��.�:K.. iE�EC ;:tF�C 'V� C:�� :r�.r:-: ,:.'?'tlt�i"y� rC) �;C;Ui':"1�. j):iIZ �,' `r;�' (`;i`�� l)1��ili:IltUll� � �'V`_:`,�1';I1£'�C�)Ii, i[1�7�t;Gi LC1 ;�:5 1'��`S 'i:1:�:1fC�Tli�ii':CL,S :�lell flilQ��itli"a'�2��T li? �� i(ll�Cf:, i11hC.� ��t �.CC•C'I:'i �._�:�y �)l.l�)�li; ::41.•dlr�`..'S, Y1�Ge I c.�f'�? K ^ , fiw140YCaW4#Rr+��tt:�vr�nucN<...r.r.....�....�.��,ir.��....,....�....,....._._...- r;:�l i �`W_S �3 i��t_' :y ;I'1 I lk_'L i� rl ;)f� 1 r�l'Zl �)�. f){ ��, � �;'.1�11} lt'{71i'r :_'U1d11�'�i$�', JT�iL; �ie�i l'.(�(: � SE'� �nii1.: [tlt� �1�1'.c.��:iik)It Csr Eflt� C�C;SC:C��7r.,f� ��.II'��l,i�' '� :(ic. � 1t�,Y .)r 1Z�i'?[UI1. ��V'«5�11.1"s�;��l�I�l CiS 1�.?t1�€; Sill.t�4�,�3�641 'II�;i'� ��_ f:!�:t;l'ti�'ll��`I C7i��i '�7 [:�,?l'; :.L)ilC;�f�i�'��', ��.��jC�iLiC.`1f�. ' _ '�Il'l��Y':';;� .� =,� �4':�1�:"��'i��'�;: I:vt�rv��i,��sa�j��t wl�u si;�a.i titr;.�:�>�itiun �+�ith :tr,}� <�rJz�•r ti�:r.t I�is or lier t�iAe tiaa:ae, c�, �yftr� n:Yt{J�r"iit��t �d,5t15' 1d7dlYE,'t�I,dE2 ll`�tE•` lJf i'r1�,'�t?j�L'�>llOf��S, r>> ��,�,'if 'Cl�7C'Cil�la�lt�'�C'�i"!lt�, ldt2 t'jr.'i!I'[ll2 1�'f2�F.'it JZ8 OY .••, ,ift� :s �tvt':t It-�� ' v�rer, vr s:g,ts �-��t.tid��t. xltiair b� vr:Ire:ti� ut�'rer;vi��aa;�t r�acali,tt�:l tr.,�r.�;fi, vr� Ft�.z.o rnrEk�es �:erc�irt ,rr�r frils�� rtr�.�f��r�e�►ii, sFia�l1 b�� ,E,riiltv nf a r�zi�df�ink��z�t�r. ��1C '�.i;lift,. �il:�:l�'C'.(3 �lll�'t' 1�;i i ��4E; :±��OVC �)c)11(;Ufl l!fi(.� iGl'1��,`��t t0 ��1�:;i�(�1i'1-� Cri :��:1J r�C:TIt1Uf1. (,Vn.ines oFpefitit�irt�� r`turt!d b�su it.eratfi'sl f�r+u a.�r/s��ctif:e ditirr u,r;pectr«�� r.;can'ir� �F... ,�{��,�un ��,�te1;.� ,��the r�al e.+tu't�.; _. —___ _ rJ -- _ __. _....._ ` `.'F".,. f _._._.. .., __ .__, � <:r ,. `t____ .,`�:tl..l., � _ _ i i -_ __ ___.._. _ .. � .d!s: � t)� �_1.L;.�� 't?, �� i ; ; , .'�.s�. ..3�,. ��•,�,t�}stx�:�� „ r,�, � , �, ., � �: ,;>: . , , , t _, <cs��. : � � �� ,� ,- , �...,.. ' � � , _ . ; .. __ : 1i 1 ZZC� %�fi��c St. ; �ftR.Ci:� TP �$ _ � ��' y ; �--/-02 �2�,�,� �� Z3o5 �lo �z � �( �os�C,� �'�s`� � . _- - - , G��, 1 2 z�.� l�.J-�-A�e s,�. ��c� I �'� -� ��6Z ` . ��-�N� �s � � l 2�3vs `� �S2-- ��.� ,� ��5��`.- `7�-�� _ _ � _ _ , � i -'� ; ' ' I � � i _ __.._i � � � , , 1 ___.____, i ' i � i 'i ;. I , , I � i . . .: ... . y_.. . . .. . _. ......__.... __....___J..._-....- .., . .... ....... . . . � I � "•.I. ! � I� I i � � � � ' _;...._. . . � . ..._ --_ -- ..- ---- � ..... _. �. . -- _. _. _ _ __ _ _ », � , , ; r E ,� , � , � � • � , � . � , �.._..._ � _..__.__...._.�..___._.__.____.___.� _. ..__. ..___.-----..__.__._---.--1 :';;�'�? ,�,�'? a r � ��I'�'IOl� �� I�I�E� TC� �� C��' t�� NT�1� LJI��R IZ�W 35��14�1�0 (60°Io Petition -East Renton Plateau Annexation) TO: T� ��TI' C�Ul�ICIL �F THE CI'I'Y OY' I2EN��fll� 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60°Io) in value according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, or real property located contiguous to the City of Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to t11e City of Renton under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the �ity of Renton. f�, map �Exnibit 1 j and iegal descripii�n (Exhibit 2j are included as �art oi this petition. 1n response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14.120 on Octobe� 12, 1998. The City Council then determined that the City would accept the proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree to: (1) Submit the 10% Notice of Intent Petition as an intent to annex; (2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the subject property; (3) Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan designations as they affect the subject property; and (4) Assume their proportional share of the pre-existing City bonded indebtedness. all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. WI-�ER�FORE, the undersigned.property owners petition the City Council and ask: (a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their �- approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and (b) That following such heai-ing, and consistent with any approval by the C�TYOFRENTON Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the R E C E I V E D above described ten-itory to become part of the City of Renton, .IAN 2 5 2002 Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force, and to receive City public services. BUILDtNG DIVISION Page 1 of 2 � „ . �f . This two page form page is one of a number of identical forms which comprise one petition seeking the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated, and may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures. ziYY4RNIN�: Every person who signs this petztion with any other•than hzs or her tf•ue name, or who knowzngly signs naore than one of these petiiions, or szgns a petition seeking afz election }vhen he ar she is not a legal voter, or signs a petitzon when he or she is otherwise taot qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be gidlty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitiazers should Ge in identical forni as the sanze that appear ora record in the chain of title to the real estate.) '�ax I.ot Legal l�o. Signature and 1Vyailing Description �ate �d'lIfl$�C��me E�Q�C�r�SS (Lot,Bloc,Plat,Assessor's � No.or other) 1 1. _� _o ..�' �� E��P� :. �02305 -93►�I . � � � , �� G � �► o r i �, � 2. �_Z�:....p � � �� loZ3d5 -��Z � �l.L 3. � o23as - �4 . �_z�._ �--� „ � 4. ��.Z�-° _� � ►� Ia?�os -��- , c � s. �-z�--� ..,�� y"' � , �o Z 3°S ��°31 ' �G P�3�LL �� -Z�{- �J �' ,, 1o23os -�I � � t �. �_z�..-� �� o�3 a S —� 3 4 � f�c c P �. 8. 9. RECEIVE JAN 2 5 2002 BUILDING DIVISION Page 2 of 2 �`-_,.—�, ��1�1 �� 1�11�1�1'1 T� �� 9�.1�1��1�1 ZJN��R R�vV 35A.14.120 (60°Io Petition -East Renton Plateau Annexation) TO: TI� C�T�' COIJI�CIL OF TH� CITY OF l�EN��N 200 Mil] Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60°Io) in value accarding to the assessed valuation for general taxation, or real property located contiguous to the City of Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Rentoa. �i map ��xhibit i j and iegal descrip�i�n (�x��ibi�2 j are included as part of thi c p�Yi�i n;�. In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14120 on October 12, 1998. The City Council then determined that the City would accept the proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree to: (1) Submit the 10°Io Notice of Intent Petition as an intent to annex; (2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the subject property; (3) Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan designations as they affect the subject property; and (4) Assume their proportional share of the pre-existing City bonded indebtedness. all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. �n%i��Fvi�E, the undersigneci property owners petition the City Council and ask: (a) That the Ciry Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and (b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the CIi'yOFRENTON Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the R E C E I�E D above described ten-itory to become part of the City of Renton, Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in �AN 251002 force, and to receive City public services. B��DING DIVISIpN Page 1 of 2 � . � . This two page form page is one of a number of identical forms which comprise one petition seeking the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated, and may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures. WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he vr she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement,shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in t/ze chain of title to the real estate.) Tax Lot Legal No. Signature and 1l�Iailing Description �StC PI'illtel��Ta1T18 At�C11'CSS (Lot,Bloc,Plat,Assessor's No.or other) ,o Q , � ��,�� .��.�.os �y�{� /0.�30.�y030 1. 1�O�dZ �j�O,¢ r /y vL= .� E �i.�✓o.c9 �y cv�4 �&'D 5 Y 2. // � m2, �Q �c�/�r ��i��r /Zz d 5 .y8�� ,�,�r `��" � �. ,�„�� d�3 05'9�.�0 _ �✓.�� '�e-�s�9 Y�o�f 3 _._..-�.---____..__....._.....__. 4. 5. 5. 7. . g� R �CEIV D , JAN 2 5 2 02 �� BU1L�lNG DIVI ION Page2of2 ,�"�,��,� •. . ��1'�l �� t�l'�1�1�1� �� 3 �� l��l`� IJN��I� R�W 3�Ao14.1�0 (60°Io Petition -East Renton Plateau Anne�ation) TO: TI� C�T�' C�ITI�CIL OF THE C�T�' O� REI�1Tt)t�T 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (b0%) in value according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, or real property located contiguous to the City of Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of RCu135A.14.120 et seq. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the �ity of Renton. � map (Exhibit i j ana iegal descriptian (�xhibi� 2 j are included as �art oi thi� �etition. In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14.120 on October 12, 1998. The City Council then determined that the City would accept the proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35�.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree to: (1) Submit the 10% Notice of Intent Petition as an intent to annex; I (2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the I subject property; (3) Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan designations as they affect the subject property; and (4) Assume their proportional share of the pre-existing City bonded indebtedness. all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. tivi��'cEFvi�E, the undersignect property owners petition the City Council and ask: (a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their approval or disapproval of such annexation or to aslc questions; and CIT y pp RENT �(b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the R E C E��ED Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the �AN above described territory to become part of the City of Renton, 2 5 2�2 o ce,land to re b ive City public servo es.ances then and thereafter in BUI�p�NG p�VISIpN Page 1 of 2 . This two page fotm page is o�ie af a rtum�er of identical forms which compi�ise one petitian seeking the annexation of the descri6ed territory to the C�ty ot R.enton, Washingtan as above stated, and may be filed wich c�th�r pag�s cant�ining addityana4 signatures. WARNING: Every persvn whr�signs thxs pet�tion wdth any oth�r than h�s.or her true name, or whu knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or segns a petition seeking an electdan when h�or sh��S not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualifeed to sign, vr who makes hentn any false statem�ent, shuil be gu�illty of a m�sde»:eanor. 'fhe undersigned have read the above pekstic�n and consent to the filing of this petitian. lNames of petilionrrs should be in id��nr;cat,/'i�rr» as the sa�ne Ntat appear on record in the chain of title to t�te real escateJ �—` � Tax Lot Legal No. Signature and Mailing Descriptlon Yr4nted Name Address �L°�'�iOC'�'"�°`�s Date No.�K ocher 1. �;�, ��a7 1�-8�+ Av� ic23�^�S �N��c� c� � REN i a�1� I�V� j ��u2 �AcK; M� P�WER� qg�5� � �� ' � � 1�2�207 I�-8th �qVE 1c23�� 92!i3a5 '"� sF REN��►v� w� �� 7 t �o� D�Nis'� T, Po�Jc�S 980�� 3. 4. 5. ______�. 6. 7. 8. 9. _ RE�EIVED ��OOZ B��LDING pIVlS1QN ��Z,�f�� '�'�� i�I�1LX '1'U ��-� i, �.��'�'�' (��+ .i�,.i�r�'C��ef �TN-.i��I� 1�C.'.�'� ��.��.�2�� " y (bilt,�, l-'etitir.�n - ��t�;i. l:e.r,t��I�I'I�t!��iu �,.sliic.xalii�i�y �rc�: rt�.i�� c ��fi�� s��_,�,,c�:�.�., c�r rr��r�: c_�o�� c�ry, �rr�,.:��a�t�� '�Gf:) Nfil! �\vr,ziir', Sr�llth Rc�it��t:, l�v't� �J8(}�5 'I'he au.�di�rsi�i��ci ..ire c�witit:rs i�f IiCI I�,sS lfi.:�[i Sl:ti(y i�i,�'i;�ni. ((�i()�I�j in �•�ilue. �ec:r�.rrii�Y� tc� the [iSSC;SSk:(:1 Vil�ll�t�,ll'lll �'C.Il' �"711,r$� ��lX�i�ll'711� Q!'i'�:`c31 �)I-l)�7L!"t.�� i�Gi�tt"•CI C:i�f1�1�L1i741S T.c.� lflt: �'il�� c}t h.�;i�l�.m. �VJz he�'eby ��tt[.i�ni I.h.tl. ��tt:l:� ;}rc>}��;�'ty�>c; �nn��,er.f tii �#tic; (-'.il.y<�#'12e��tnti��nd�r �he ��rovisi�m� nF (�CW 35A.14..1'?t! er. .S�q. 1'he 1:errit.r�iy i?�'t:��i��;�i �c7 he annexed ;s ��,�.illiiri l�i��*{'��t�t�Yy, Wasl��in�knn, ;3t�ci i5 cc�n�i�uc,ta5 iu ihe. i_ity c,t l:e�t�r,�,. :�� In�zi� (�,Yhihit i 1 ;3r+ii i��tl cie:,c.,-il�ti��n (��.x.hit7ii "l) �ll'2 lflc'I'11411;C3 as j,a�-r c�; il?is ��ctili�»Z. !n r�spcm�e tc�, ;, cl�.tiv `ii�.d ancl ctmsiciet�ed "�t��tiu��, �.,! Iril.entinn" tt� ,.uliili��i��, ,i�lne.�.;�ti��ii p�-c.�c�.eedit��,s, Ifi4 ('i�.�� (:nuncif i,,�t tf�.r. ('ity ��f r�cnu>n �i�ec w1�'�7 Cllt: lI]I�lclttTl��)i.13"!Jes ttcic_lcr Tt(-.1V 351�.14,1"?� c,n t:�c<<rl,e; I?, 1.{)�-)�. Tli�; C'.iiy ('c,�.u�i:il �i,c�l rictcrrnineci �h�.►t t.17� (�IT'y WULIIL� clL'l:P.,�)1' th� pt��p�s�;C] �u.�n�x�il',()11. }"�iIl'l:IlZf•> ��irs��rYt tc, 1ZC:�� 35r1.1�7. I?Q, f}i<: �iu�.i��i3i�,ric�c.i�,etitinn�-zs ti�ree to: f.i j _5i�ii rur nc� !(}�I� .N�itic::�.; �yf lri��n�. 1'��ii.ir�,n �;�; ,�� ir�t��rs1 lU an»cx: l?) ��c',;�ri f!i��. (=.`it_y�'� sirn�.il�a:;ec:��.i�. ��ili�l>ri��n ui�cUuiri�;re�;ula�ic�,n�; Fi�r rl�c st�l:�jc��C �r��:rEy; (:�j ,�1c�:;_4>l llie: C'ily:5 ('��m��i-chrl�;,t',rc;I'l�ii; I.��:;i7rTlilL]UIIS �lti t.I3e�� 1t'Ie;c�� f�i: :;iil�j�c:1 ��.r�7p�;z�ly; �tn�� (;�) ,�1�.5�i�ric� tl�i�.ir prc�pcyrtitm�i sl-��ll"�. (]t 1'}..it'. (.)t'(.'-c;X.1�l1Tlt C'.i�y hcmcli:ci i..ncir'.I,ti:iltlC;ss. ��11 as ni�teci ir� �I�c r�,:i.�.u.t[c,� �il`th�� ("_'I_illi]L'1� 7'[1C.�,�I11�? ar�c-1 c�c�nta.i��;c:i ir� ttac: �;lcc:lrr_�nic i-cc�:�rding c�F Siic_!> >��eet��af;. �Gi��iL;K:�l�(.JlZN., i.��ie ui�ciersi;*ne.ci�i�r��j7crry t7t�ncrs pcli�i�m th� (:il.y f�171.1pC;lI �Il('� ;�slc; {�� '1'I�a� !.I��e (.�;i�.y (,c,ui;i;il F��.x. ,� clati: t��.,r a ;,ukalic he�inriU ahi>t.i�: such ��re;1,r,s;cd ;:u�nex.ati.on, c;:l>>sc� i� [1(7IlC.L', IC7 }Jt. nuhlished anci l�c�sr.e�i. spec_;lyi��g i:lZe tiine. ai�il ��l�ac;r; �if suc:h h�arin�;, t�n�i invilin� all �,e:t�ti�.anti �uhn ,�i:z it�t�rc-ST.�'.�i tn ti��,�.�ar aL llii l��triiz�; �nd 5t.a�e Ll��ir CITY OF RENTON .- t�E��i nti�sii i;.r dis�x��pr,_,v�iI oF;u�}�� innex��i��n or to �s�r.�uestiotl�; �al��:l R E C E I V E D (h) 'f'!�:.�� f�:,ili-,wi�is�; .;�ici-� :ie7.ri�iL, �:n�_i cc,nu;:,�e.�;� �vitl7 a;�}�� 1�1��-��,tr�i� �-,y r��:�; JAN 2 5 200� l�i:�u:�i�1;.i:'y..fl.'r,','i�:w r�i�i��;:l; il:�� C.'it1' ( 'ciu�i�'.il I�y t��-i1it��n�;e ��31��e.x I.l�i', ��i��,�i: c1;-�i,rili'r.�! ter��i*.��i y t:� k,i�i�c:yt.i:: �;tt�'L ��C Llu� C.'iLy t�!'1Li.:r��r.�r�, BUILDING DIVISION �ti',,"I:ir�;;t�ti, suLj�i;t h�, i[s lriu�� tn�l ix�cIinar��c:; lhc:n 3Flil L}1C.i"'�ttll.�_I� :1'1 1�r:,j�:,:. �uid �.c� rc.cui�<<: (=.'it�r Elu�-ilic ;;c�v.ces, I''i'r;l, � Of �� ZO'd dL0=E0 �O-ZZ-��C' . - , • 'l:hi� lw�� pu��e ��i,;t�; .�a�.� i..s u�i�: of i; nuiiib�:r ��1'i�:znr.i.�;�l f�:�r.ii�s wliicil cn.tlil.>ti�� c>nr. �;4:iitic.��1 s�,t,kt�� tti� �tnr.e.x�i�.i;m i�t�fklc cie�criLccl t��iC��r}� tc; �li� ('iry ��f Rcrilcri�, �V�i��i�i�;;�t�}n 1� �I�i�ve �t�ted, atrc? tn.�� f��; Filc:�? wi�Ei c>Ll��.r;��:�fe., c:nn�.iin.ajr`� f�clCl]titmt�.l Sibti�:l'ureti. W,�tR1VINf�: 1�'rsrr��per•s'UR iV{Il) SFx'7d,ti t�tLS�)(?1r�i<ur wilh.irr�}� atfac:r 11ru�x/ris oi•li�,�tr�rre reccrrce, r,r- �olau �.�tou}i.ragly,�ig�a,c runre 1ha.n. rrne u�'Lhes•e peliliu�2.1', ��r 57,��IYS (l�)Btl�dUll,Y'L'Elcin�Y an f�le�clion ��ht�r� jiE �>r- a'hr.is�nr�t u le,��ctl vnt�i; u�•,��r},f�r,�'u�relilinn �s�hE.rr hEr u+•��hE��,s�c,lh<.r�vise. rr.ot qr.crr.lif'ic�ci to sigr�, r'�►' Fvhri nzcr.lrc�.s IEGYL'L!L[11L.V tL(�.1'E. .1't(ItF:T)j4rr11, .tifar�l!he�,TT11.I1.y !Jf!7 1J'L1.S[tt?)1'lBl'/710i•. 'i�l�ie �incicrsi�;nE�l }��ave. re.�c� i.he ,�br:�-i: �ictitic�ii ��nci cs,ns�.a,t. rc7 rfae riliu�; c�l' �.I�i�; j�,�:t.ikioi�. j�Ncur�t'.5 ri(pefitir,�7�:r•.e s/int��rl hr,ru.ide�aticc�.(,,`i;r�,u «.r[iir.rruu4'1)�.e47 rtt;pf'C�'nr�rtenrd i�:lfie i:lulirr ejf till�'1��ll�e rectl e.�fn,ti'.) I .__ ... . . ._ —_.....---- .. . _ _. _...... . _.... ��''iiX Li)L I,L'�31 .�t}.� ; ,�i�;naiu��c ��d Nir�ilit�� i.)�scri��ii��n ��i111'. ��!'1.11$B(1 �,�171e ,�,t�i�f'�,,5� tl:ui,f)1��c,Plvt,ASgrssur's _... . ..... •---�--�— --- 1Vu,ur athcr� ....., _....... . -�—�-- 1. . I �3 bZ, � I�.�l� ��t�� S�. � Io23o5-902� .. .-- � ' , i��t v✓A �i�Cjs� � --_ . .. .....—_.._._...._ � � R�'`' � ?• 'j z3�-�2 �`� iaa-t( I�f� G�C� S'C �0�305_qo21 . Ma��v ��L ; Re.ti�� c� ��S I ,�i 4 ' � � I �� f 3 , .. . .._ . .._ . . .. . � ,........_---�----.._.. ; �1. � i � I � __ .. __..._._ _ . .. _..._______.. __.__..___.______. . . _i___. .. .__._. _ . ...____ _..____ 7. 5 � . , ----..._ ... .......... .. .._. .. .._. _.—._..__ ----�---� --�-------.._....---�-- � : ��, � CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED JAN 2 5 2002 ''``�` r "f�:� €o'd ►3UILDING DIVISION dL0=�o zo—ZZ—up[' w-� � ��'�I��1� �'� r��I�E� �(� �I�� C�T'I' �� T�N LTI��R R�W 35��14a1�0 (60°Io Petition - East Renton Plateau Annexation) TO: T� CIT�' ��Ui��L �F 'I'HE �ITY OY� I�N'�'�3i� 200 Nlill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60°Io) in value according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, or real property located contiguous to the City of Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the �ity of Renton. f� map (Exhibit 1 j and iegal description (Exhibit 2j are included as �art of this petition. In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14.120 on October 12, 1998. The City Council then detern7ined that the City would accept the proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the ul�dersigned petitioners agree to: (1) Submit the 10°Io Notice of Intent Petition as an intent to annex; (2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the subject property; (3) Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan designations as they affect the subject property; and (4) Assume their proportional share of the pre-existing City bonded indebtedness. all as noted in the minutes of the Council ineeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. Wi�REFORE, the undersignecl.property owners petition the City Council and aslc (a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their � approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and CiTVOFRENTON � ECEIVED (b) That following such heaizng, and consistent with any approval by the ,�,:��J 2 5 2�02 Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the above described ten-itory to become part of the City of Renton, �+ai�DlNG DIVISION Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force, and to receive City public services. Page 1 of 2 ��.\.� ,�c c.��c �.�-,.,�.U �' ��, � �t: �� 36 i G tv� � ��.�-+.e s ^ ' Aj l�! 'V�P� v`30.� � �-� �'t" �- ��z s� 31��`t 3 s ir�„��: � � J .�.,� `� � 3� Th�s t.wo paa� fo�r�n i� on�: ut�zi�.dx�l�er c�i identic.al £�rms wl,ich compr�s�one petztion seeking tk�i� annexatac�� 4f the d«;si;T'��i�'�� tercitory k4 the CitY of Rentoi�, Was�iir��ton as above st�ted, a�xd rnav b� fzled vvsth otli�.r��°:��s ..c3n`�a6�it��; ad�.iticaraal si�n�tux�s. 6�':>�RN1'��G: �v�ry��c�rsvre ►vlr�ea signs �h�s�ae�i�aori s�vtth nra�,��vt�'z�r tltun ��is or lte�°true nanie. ar wla.n kr�orvtn�ly sigris mcrre t3zarr. ;��a�'r'1��•se,�E�titic�ris, or sagt��a p�tztivaa see��e.rrg an election fvh.e,rt .iie or� sl'ae is arr�t a legal�}ot�r, ��r��t.�t�� t,��tita�n �+��n li�a�r�che is c�d;��rn�xs� �nol q�c�lifaed tn sigr�, nr who rr�akes��erein uny.fals�secrtE<ttleatt, s•had�be gui�"ry�af a n�is�l�rn�arzo�. '�'he i�r:dersigned kaav� re��d t"ne ��ov��etiti��i� anc��:o7aser:�. to fhe filiizg af this pf�fi:lic�n. {;�r"a,r�es v,/"�eritiv�r�rs sleoufd he iar�el�raaiea=,�'arm a�t1e�s�r»ir:aleat�zppaar n��recc�rd i►a the�:ha�r:af�Cigde tG tlee r•ea!�sdcrtd.) ,__�____ .—.____...._.__. _...�..__.._____.__________________r..I.__�ax �_,o� L�g�l�io. �y�n�ture �ud 4 1��aal�ng � I�esc�ipti�n ( � "� le _�(��,�'�SS (Lot,l3fuc,Plat.�csessor's I � �}:l�e ��'idlt�C� � �Ii � -------- �Io.�ar otire �� f 1 �yA� C��g �� i��a, '�y� ►�✓'� � �� 3 o Y �i'�� 1. CI ZZl�� - ^�� E�� r�,ir�;-�� wrg9 ._- ----._. ___ ' I �" � � ! �_�� _�___._�.______—.__^_..�.,�____-_ �._._.____ ___�.� � � , �. � I �. ___.._. f _..________._�.___.�.� ___�r____.�.._.�....,.� --_____� � �.. � � 4 � ____��_ �._.____..________. _ __ _� _ _ _�__._ .�___._._ � �� ; - ___ ____--_.-_------____ �� .--�...______.�_______--.__-� � � i ��. i E - -.- -__..__-__-___.___- _�______ � .� ._ �. �� __.-------_ __.__ ___ � _.�___.._.__._. � _ � i �__ 1 �. Il�. _ _�..__r_� t V. __�..._._._e.._-- -___ --- �_ .-� ��__J CITY OF flENTON RECEIVED JAN 2 5 2002 �3��z nf�z BUILDING DIVISION �-�-„--_._�, �� ETI'��T �� Nl�TE� T() �'�� C�TY �F I�I�T�'�l� LTN��R 1�CW 35A.14.1�� (60% Petition -East Renton Plateau Annexation) TO: TI� C�T�' COi1i�CIL OF THE CITY OF I�ENT�3N 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60°Io) in value according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, or real property located cantiguous to the City of Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. �i map (�xnibit 1 j and iegal descrip�ian �Exi�ibii 2 j are included as part of this pet?r;�n. In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14.120 on October 12, 1998. The City Council then determined that the City would accept the proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree to: (1) Submit the 10°Io Notice of Intent Petition as an intent to annex; (2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the subject property; (3) Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan designations as they affect the subject property; and (4) Assume their proportional share of the pre-existing City bonded indebtedness. all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. tivI�IZErvt�E, the undersignect property owners petition the City Council and ask: (a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and (b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the CITVOFRENTON Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the R E C E I V E D above described ten-itory to become part of the City of Renton, JAN 2 5 2002 Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force, and to receive City public services. �UILDING DIVISION Page 1 of 2 . ......_.._.. �� v �c:� '� �..�.�� u-CQ ,��-�Q .,�`�� . . � 7'�is two pa�� form �a�;� is u��e c+f a nurnr��r�f ider�tical farms vuhich cc�mprise one ��etitio �� seeksr�.� kh� �nnexati�,r �t t�?e ciesca��d territc�ry° to the �`��y a�'Kenton, ��asi�ington as ab�ve �tated, and rnay be fil�d �,�it��< <�ther pa�es ;..ontair�in� 4 d�itian�l sigraatures. �y (�(�G..�'2_ �VAR�YIIVt;: Ever;y p�ersrpra whcf sigrrs thi�p�etition �vttJr an,�atl�er t�a�a hts�r he�true n�ame, or w�h�a Knawcngty signs m�nre ta��n vn�vf t�rese p�a`#��rns, ar signs a p�$�'io�x se�el�ir�g an electia�a �he�z dx��rr she i��ot ra I�gat'v�rt�r, �r si,g��xs a;�etiti�rr� �v�+e�n 1��or slae is other�rvis�e no�'gua�'if�ed to srg�, or whn �takes hea�eirt a�gp,�a�'se st��en�nt, ,€��Crz��ua13y c�f a��sde�rn��r�vr. 'I`�� undersi�ned have �-e�� tt�e ab�ve p�t�trc�n a�c� ccrn,s�nt t� the 4'ilir�; af chts petiticsr.. ,lNaoal��s to,�''getiiidnert slaottlrl6e itc eet=r.zeiral,j'r�rrrY rt�the s�aen�e t+eut a�persr on recard d,n the c3�aim�rf`tztle to the raul estate.) �. ____.._..._�._�_�.._____ __.__�.__.. - _____�.._._ . Tax Lot d.��,�1 Na. jSfg�t:��re an� ! htai�fng Descr�ption D�ate �'r�c�t�. Nmr�e Addr.ess c�.Rc,�io�,pza�,��x�� :vr�.a►r acts�r} _.._._ , . ��u ��, -�_ / yz.ro �1.� ��r;.�= - - -- — 1. /l.�,��:' �� p,� t-��nG/� R,�:`1y,�,,��' v�';� �j"�'a�i' f�2`3Q�PC�I��r�j ,� . `� ' _.---��,�=e` , � a'° �ai�7�st" . ,� 2. � �3�.2 � ��'N7�R1, �(JA• 9��' ,��-� /�'IA,�� D � _�....�___ ---_. ______-- ._ - -- � �. � E .�....._._....__ .�.��.._ _._....._. __....�__ ______ � � ' � �._ ._�...._._._._..._._.�_____.�_ ---- - .____. - - i � � �. _._._�.__._.�. - __._._.�_.�_�____ .�....��,__.___. , ! b. � j � ._.�..__..�.._._...�_.________�__._________ -- _.�.-._--.�.---...�_ 7. � � � __ - - --.__._.._..._._e__._..�_..__._.�. .��.___.._.__ 8. � ' y. � �� i �._....._._�......_�. -- _�____ �- — -- _.�.__._._.�.9 ORY OFRENTi�N R�CEIVEI�a�e2c�f2 .IAN � 5 �QQZ �3t�Ir��M�il��I��p FRO�'I :FAh10 N R.EGIO�J 425 342 549p 2��2,�1-22 16:24 it1�3 P.pl:'�2 � � .,,`_,., Post-it�Fax Note 7671 �e1B f 2� o� PA9es� Z � Tv S��-� From ��1��1�1 1� �1�ti�iL' � � Co.lDepc Co, f Phane rt Phone u Q.1�L'S1 �� FexN Fexp (60% Peution -East R' T0: TI�E CIT'�' COUNCIL OF THE CJ7CY OI` R�N�ON � 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, W'A 98055 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60%}in value according to the assessed valuation for generai taxation, or real properry located�contiguous to the Ciry of Ren�on. We here3�y petition tha[such propert�l be annexed to the City of Renton undEr the prov�szons of � RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. The tezrito�y proposed to be ailnexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the CiC�of Renton. A map (Exhibit I) a�nd l�g�l descnption (Exhibit 2) are included as l�art of tl�.is petition. In r�sponse to a duly fi�ed and considered "Notice o.f lntez�ti.on" to con�xzence annexation � proceedings, the City Council of[he City of Ren�on met With �he initiating par[ics under RCW 35A.14.I20 on October 12, 1998. The City Counczl tlaen determined that the City vciauld acc�pt tl�e pzopased annexation. Further., pnr.suant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersi.gned peutioners agree to: (1) Submic che 10% Notice of Tntent k'eri tion as an intent to annex; (2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning.r.ega�ations Cor the subjec�propercy; (3) Accept the Cit�'s Comprehensive 1'IAn designations as they affcct the subject property; and {4) Assuzn� their proportional share of�lae pxe-existin�City bonded indebtedness. al] as noted in �hc minures o,f. the Council meEting and con[ained i.n ��ie electronic recortling of such meeting. WI�R�FORF:, the undersigned,propeny owners petition the Ci�y Counci2 an�i ask: (a) That the City Council fix a�latr: for a public hear�ng about such proposed annexation, cause a nalice eo be ptiblished and posted, specifying tl�e tiza�e and plaee of sueh heari.ng, and invicing all persbns who arc interesied co appear at thc hearing and sLate eheir - approval or disapproval of such annexarion or �a ask quesuons; and (b} Th1l follr�wing sucl� heat�ng, �nd consisCent with any approval Uy the Boundary Review Baard, �he Cicy Council by ordinance annex �he above described cenicory lo becom� par� oF�he Ciry olRentorr, Washing�on, sui�ject to i�s laws and ordinances then and therea[ter in farcc, and [� receivE Ciry public ser��iccs. CRVOFRENTON RECEIVF,�,Dag� 1 of2 JAN � 5 ZOU2 �� FROri :FAMO r� REGIOr� 425 342 539� 2��2��i-22 16:25 #1�3 P.p2;'�2 ,�� i _ This two page fozm page is one of a number of identical fonns which comgzise one perivan � see)cing the annexatiqn of the described territo,ry�o �he Ciry of Renton, Washington as above ,� sta[ed, and may be filed wich ocher pages con�aining additiona� signatures. �r' WARNING: Every persvn who signs thrs petitzun wrth any other�han his or her true riunte, or who krcowingly signs mare than orze of these petitio�zs, or si gns a petition seeking a�i eleccion»�he�s he or she is not a 7eg�l voter, or signs a petinon whert he or she is otherwise n�t quulifzed to sign, nr}v110 makes herein any fcrlse statem.ent, sha11 be guilty of u mrsdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above pe�ition and caiisent to the filing oF this getition. (Na�nes of petrlioners shoutd be in identical form as the same�hat�tppenr ors record in tke chni,e of title lo rf�r real esiate.) Tax Lot Le�al No. Signature and 1Vlailing Description D$� Printed N�ttne � �.dciress (Lot,IIluc,Plnt,Asseasnr�s ...r� , t ��n_�� Nu.m•olhcr 1. �` a, �Tr`��'�1�v�,_ 9 3�3 � ,a 7 Ati'� fn1 � !�2 3ps �o c�Z 2oQZ �J M��c��r� ��4 f�rs -i:~ �6-t V C c�'�Z,Z�' � 3. 4. 5. 6. � � 17 - ,. 8. 9. cm oF Rer�roN RECEIVED Pabe 2 of 2 JAN 2 5 2002 BUILDIAIC'.a DIVISION M � r PETITION TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 (60°Io Petition -East Renton Plateau Annexation) TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON 200 Mil] Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60%) in value according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, or real property located contiguous to the City of Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the �ity of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1 j and iegal description (�cxhibit 2 j are included as part of this petiti�n. In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14.120 on October 12, 1998. The City Council then determined that the City would accept the proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree to: (1) Submit the 10°Io Notice of Intent Petition as an intent to annex; (2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the subject property; (3) Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan designations as they affect the subject property; and (4) Assume their proportional share of the pre-existing City bonded indebtedness. all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. WI�REFO�RE, the undersigned property owners petition the City Council and ask: (a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and (b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the above described ten-itory to become part of the City of Renton, Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in CiTY OF RENTON force, and to receive City public services. R E C E I V E D .��g�� '1 Bt�ull�Iq��IN�II�II� � , . � This two page form page is one of a number of identical forms which comprise one petition seeking the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated, and may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures. WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be i�i identical fonn as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.) Tax Lot Legal No. Signature and Mailing Description Date Printed Na e Address (Lot,Bloc,Plat,Assessor�s No.or other `� �� L u-U�4 D�l PtA �,9a �e�s y� 1' sc.'�//�l�� .SAn1 s��"L'�io CA�iI}� �o�3 c�,s-' q��E / M.�nl-�/�� L,a I 2. 3. 4. 5. 5. 7. 8. 9. CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED JAN 2 5 2002 Page 2 of 2 BUILDING DIVISION �s * s �ETI��OI�TT TO A�NI�1E� 'I'O �� C��Y O� �NT�IeT I1N�ER I�CW 35A.14.1�0 (60°Io Petition -East Renton Plateau Annexation) TO: THE CIT�' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTa1lT 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60�0) in value according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, or real property located contiguous to the City of Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to ihe City of Renton. fi map (Exnibit i j and iegal descriprian �Exi�ibii 2 j are include�i as pa�--t of th?S ��,�?�?�:1. In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence anneYation proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14.120 on October 12, 1998. The City Council then determined that the City would accept the proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree to: (1) Submit the 10% Notice of Intent Petition as an intent to annex; (2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the subject property; (3) Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan designations as they affect the subject property; and (4) Assume their proportional share of the pre-existing City bonded indebtedness. all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. iiVi��FGt�r:, the undersignect property owners petition the City Council and ask: (a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and (b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the above described ten-itory to become part of the City of Renton, Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force, and to receive City public services. c�TvoFRErvTON RECEIVED JAN Z 5 2002 page 1 of 2 BUILDING DIVISION r � �"his two page form page is ��ne af a n�mber nf idei�tical forms which comprisa one petitian seeking the annexation of tr,e d�scnb�d t�rritory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated, and may be til�ed witlZ other pabes cantaining additional signatures. WARNING: Every persort wha signs this�petition with any other than his or her true name, or who ktiowi�gYy signs more than v�r�of these p¢titiorts, �r signs a petitlon seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or sfgns a petltlnn when hs or she is otherwise ru�t qualifesd to sign, or who mulres herein any false statemerst, shall be gaiJ.�y s�f e�m�tsdemearzor. The undersigned have read rr�e above �etitian and cansent to the�iling of this petition. (Names of petttioners should Ge in ulenticat f�r�n ns th�e sa�ne tlittt oppear un recorrf!n 1/re rhain of title to the�eal estatt.) TA71C IAt LC��AI NO. Si�na�ture and �Iail�ng D�escript�on �8te ,��'�'1R�N812t@ Acir�ress (�-Ot�Bloc,Plat,Assescor�x �� --- _ _ Na ar ocher 1. V o'�'� E .eoe.� «- - - /Z�� i4/8' �''�9� S� i��v� �-: , �.. ��G, /OL��S 9v�8 �s l�� .- - .._ �E�J7'7��1 �.v.� `�g'�s� . Z. � / f?r�;,��,.� Q, ,Cd�� i�o,S`� ��g ;,��J �S� !Z��l �'�t - � -, .�. C�� a7aN W.� �oS`� /�� S �C�� 3. �. � 5. � 1 � t + �, �. �. 9. ' . , . _ _ . � RETCEIVED � Page 2 of: JAN 2 5 2002 BUILDING DIVISION � f . �ETIT�iOl�T TO ANI�TEX TO T�E CI�Y O� �NTOleT LTN��Z I�C�V 35A.14.120 (60% Petition -East Renton Plateau Annexation) TO: T�E CIT�' COUNCIL OF THE CI'�Y OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60%) in value according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, or real property located contiguous to the City of Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the �ity of Fcenton. �i map �Exnibit ij and iegal descriptian (Exhibii 2j are included as part of this n�t?t;�n. In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14.120 on October 12, 1998. The City Council then determined that the City would accept the proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree to: (1) Submit the 10% Notice of Intent Petition as an intent to annex; (2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the subject property; (3) Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan designations as they affect the subject property; and (4) Assume their proportional share of the pre-existing City bonded indebtedness. all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. W i3�IZEFG�, the undersigneci property owners petition the City Council and ask: (a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and (b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the above described ten-itory to become part of the City of Renton, Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in CITV OF RENTON force, and to receive City public services. R E C E I V E D �al�� 2�422 BUILDING DIVISION t ,. ....... ......t,,,,�.. ..."" �.�� ... ,,..� �- -"---'--' -' '--- ----- ..._._.__ + . s�e,kirlg the anncxation o�thc describ�d temtbry to tho Ciry pf R.entan, Washingt�n as above sLateci, arkd may be tiled wit)i othez pagzs containing additaona.i signatures. W,�f,,RN�NG; ,&verp perso.rs who sig�s this prti�ion wrth miy at3i�r thsn lt�s�r'her�ru naete,or whv k�eowtt�gly�fgxs�ot�e tle�v�e af t�iese psl3tfo�s,or a�ig�ts a padrtoR saeki�Cg aA eY�ctian►�1Mtt hs nr she is sa�t a legel v�er,�sigrrs a,�et6r�on wlieit hs or ake ts atlurwise nat qual�ad to a�s;ar who makts her�+t�r jalst st�te�e��.shall be gRi�ef a m�+seatwr The u�de�signed hav�r�ad tht abavc pceieion and consent co che filing o�rh,is petidon_ (Nd►ttes Dfpelf�foatts sh4uld b�ln r�f4n�icQt form ar rhs sarne chat appscir on rscord fia the chatn of ltttt to the rsal�stste.) • �SX I,O��N0. �1��1IY8 AILd MB�I� �QSCP�j��OA DaCe �'Zin N � A►ddress t�,��°c,e,�e+�* rto. � - IZG.�o1 l��'-t{.t /�.�.��. r"�1 �`��(� � 1. �zll$�f� I � �e�.+-nn, t�;��°�-�' ; �3�� YP�o�' ��-lX , � � �� t 2eo� c �t.�--� A-�e S� � a-�3o S �. I /��2 �e�,�,,.,,,,�,� ��os� � � � � � o �,� ► � 3. I , � � �' � rf 1 � d. "` � 1 7. � � Q. 7. . Page Z of.�. CITV OF RENTON RECEIVED JAN 2 5 2002 BUILDING DIVISION `<'."�� : � ��l��l�! �� Alrl�l�� T� �� y �� AA�il�l g �l�! IJN��R I��W 35A.14.120 (60°Io Petition -East Renton Plateau Annexation) TO: THE CIT'�' COUNCIL OF THE CI'TY OF RE1�1TtjN 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60°Io) in value according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, or real property located contiguous to the City of Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the Lity of Fcenton. �i map (Exhibit i j and iegal descripri�n (Exi�ibi� 2 j are include�i as part of r171S rJ�,t?:inn. In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14.120 on October 12, 1998. The City Council then determined that the City would accept the proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree to: (1} Submit the 10% Notice of Intent Petition as an intent to annex; (2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the subject property; (3} Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan designations as they affect the subject property; and (4) Assume their proportional share of the pre-e�sting City bonded indebtedness. all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. WI�IIZEFvi��, the undersigneci property owners petition the City Council and ask: (a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and (b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the above described territory to become part of the City of Renton, Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in R ETC ERI V E D force, and to receive City public services. JAN 2 5 2OOZ Page 1 of��iLDING DIVISION —�._ _ _.-- ---------___--_� � 4 } This t��✓�� page form pag� is cgi7e vf a nurnber of it�entycal far:r�,� which cur��prise one �eti�ion s��i�� the �r�n�xatian ot tt3e d�;,cribed. territ�ry ra the C:ity of Rer�:r�n, '+�asi�ington as above stace�, �n� m�.� be fi1e� w�itr �3th�r ��ues con!�inir,�adc#i�3c�raai si�:s�cure�. 'i�/�514°1VING. ,E"ver��,��rson wiav�t�r�s this petition t��th uny ratJ��S#ict� l�ls mr�er true narae, or whv kr��awi�gly�agns,�ra��tl��ra o,rEF of tha�se peti�ti�r�s, ar s�gr�.s��r��'atrur� seelr.�rt,�an electian whep: he r�r �he�s not a�e��xl v�t�r, o�r sagr�s a�et`itxon rwhen��v,r s��+e is otl�e��a�z��e�taa�g�uali,�"�d to si�►n, or who rlaakeS 1ri8�'err� ��y f�l.�ie stret�rte�etf s�call be g+�il�'y n,�"c�m�sd�em�ar�or, '�he un�d�rsigneci��ve re�id the ahnve petition a�� ;��ns��n� tc� t�se filin�, �►f this p�citio�. {Narr�es�,}�`petitianers x��ar<td tse in ict��tiri�t�l,fi�rn�rts tlte.s'�tne t/r,�!�ppenr ort r,er.ord in the chrsin vf,titl¢!�tFte retzd etto.te.) �___.._._._._._.�...___._.�_ ____M_._._..._... � I ._._.�..____._.____._. Tax L�c r.ega�N��. � � Signatua��and � ��a�t�ng Des�ri�atia�n D�te � 1'ri�ted '.Varre� ' �.ddres� ,�G$,a��n�aAt��s �.. .�... _ .... .�..._._...�....w.. ..e........,.._ ;'�i6.eMC lltb'�t /� �� -�'\� � l�� -�-3ci �� o 02 v �. '1 �� .� . �� 3at� o ooi a �' �' � l� �� 5� ��t'�6►'� ��-�� i 3� y��_�_ _,� � `�? � ��— r `��/`�� 3� �. G' � �' 2. l f�� od f� ��D,�- ��v� G�� - ��`� D � �'�v�l,�l-� C��'�_..._ �6S �-� z z a o� e � 3. � ._.,____...�.— — �.�._ __.- �.—� � 4. �_ ._______, __.�_._._.._._ �.�.._......�...�.� � �.. i s. b. �7. I.___ __..�.. ..._._....�._ _ �� 1 � $. ; � .�.,.�...�.. _______ar_. ..�.....�.__ ___._._..�.. .� 9. I � CITV OP RENTON RECEIVED Pa��',}�4�1 2 5 2002 F3UILDING DIVISION �., � , �ETI��N �O r�Nl�TEX Tt) �I-�� C�T'Y O�' �N�t�l�T iJN�E�Z I�� 35A.14v1�0 (60°Io Petition -East Renton Plateau Annexation) TO: THE CIT�' COUleiCIL OF THE CITY OF l�EN'�'�N 200 1Vlill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60°Io) in value according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, or real property located contiguous to the City of Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the �ity of Tcenton. �i map (r,xnibit i j and iegai descripri�n (Exi�ibii 2j are include�i as �art of this aetition. In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14120 on October 12, 1998. The City Council then determined that the City would accept the proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree to: (1) Submit the 10% Notice of Intent Petition as an intent to annex; (2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the subject property; (3) Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan designations as they affect the subject property; and (4) Assume their proportional share of the pre-existing City bonded indebtedness. all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. WI�I'cErv�E, the undersigneci property owners petition the City Council and ask: (a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and (b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the CITVOFRENTON RECEIVED above described ten-itory to become part of the City of Renton, Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in JAN 2 5 2002 force, and to receive City public services. BUILDING DIVISION Page 1 of 2 Y / This two page form page is ane of a number of identicai foi�ns which comprise one petition seeking the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated, and may be filed with uther pages containing additional signatures. WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs mnre than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he ur she is not a legal voter, vr signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shalt be guitty of a mrsdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petitian and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners s/iould be iu idenrical,(orni as the sa�ne tltat appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.) r— � Tax Lot Legai No. Signature and iVlailing D�escription Date Yrinted Name Ad�lres� (Lot,Bloc,Plnt,Assessor's No.or ofher} , f z�i'�� l�-9�h ,/11�� ''�.�.3`�-� � � ►b� �. i � ��-��' �� .��-- � . ,� (`�IZ(' �� r✓`[�5�°�--� �`� /1`'�' G� �� • �� v� ---�-�� Iz-.�cxo ,��. . �v� 2� � G Z oo �6 n 2. r- ►-�_ � - � �� n+� �✓� �� v— cy gc�� 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. N RECEIV D JAN 2 5 2002 Page 2 o��IIDING DIVISION :�'.,.---=�. '' r �5�� 1\1\i'�� i� 1�i1 �� 1 �i' 1�1�/17��1\ I1N��1� I��W 35A.14.120 (60°Io Petition -East Renton Plateau Annexation) TO: TI�EE CI'TI' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REiV'I'ON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60°Io) in value according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, or real property located contiguous to the City of Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the �ity of Tcenton. Ei map �Exnibit i j and iegal descriprian �Exi�ibii 2} are include�i as part oi th�s oe�tir;�n. In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14.120 on October 12, 1998. The City Council then determined that the City would accept the proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree to: (1) Submit the 10% Notice of Intent Petition as an intent to annex; (2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the subject property; (3) Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan designations as they affect the subject property; and (4) Assume their proportional share of the pre-existing City bonded indebtedness. all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. �%i�1�;FvicE, the unciersigneci property owners petition the City Council and ask: (a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and (b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the above described territory to become part of the City of Renton, CITVOFRENTON Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in R E C E I V E D force, and to receive City public services. ,JiQN 2 5 2002 Page �gf��ING DIVISION � � This two page form is one of a number of identical forms which comprise one petition seeking the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated, and may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures. WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.) Tax Lot Legal No. Signature and Mailing Description Date Printed Name Address ��`Or,B�OC,P�at,'�SSeSSOY�s No.or other) !-/$-o� �s8o-� �o�Q,e s�- a'134.Zo-0�5/6-c� 1' Q ,l S�D No��SN��/a �C,`GH �Klet'S bf � `��'i 29�0 2. /-IB--a� �� 39�o-o�sa-�a8 ,�c� ,e�e� K�l � �sso7 ��.s� z,3�2o�oi�o�o1 3. �'(g-b2 Krr s-1-i►nGt, K.vi 5{��vYl `5"o�crn r's�� RQZ�►lp , • �� '� �'73R2o•olSo�C� 4. � I� °Z Kr��na�Kr��ro�s�m 5. 6. �. g. 9. 10. CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED JAN 2 5 2002 Page 2 of 2 BUILDING DIVISION `��. �. . ��i A 1�S�lal 1�l �l\1a1�1� i� 1 JL.il� �� l�l i �l�l I71�E1Z I��W 35A.1�.120 (60°Io Petition -East Renton Plateau Annexation) TO: THE CI'I'�' COUNCIL OF THE CI'I'Y OF REN'I't�N 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60%) in value according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, or real property located contiguous to the City of Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of RCW 35A14.120 et seq. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. r-i map ��xnibit i j ann iegal descripri�n �Exhibii 2j are included as part oi t�11S UL.t2tip:2, In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14.120 on October 12, 1998. The City Council then determined that the City would accept the proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree to: (1) Submit the 10°Io Notice of Intent Petition as an intent to annex; (2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the subject property; (3) Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan designations as they affect the subject property; and (4) Assume their proportional share of the pre-existing City bonded indebtedness. all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. W��rvRE, the undersigned property owners petition the City Council and ask: (a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and (b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the above described ten-itory to become part of the City of Renton, Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in CITYOFRENTON force, and to receive City public services. R E C E I V E D JAN 2 5 2002 Page 1 of 2 BUILDING DIVISION .� , This two page form page is one of a number of identical forms which comprise one petition seeking the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated, and may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures. WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not quali�ed to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners sliou[d be in identical forrn as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.) Tax Lot Legal No. Signature and Mailing Description Date Printed Name Address (Lot,Bloc,Plat,Assessor's No.or other _.�,�-�.�-. �- I�� `��— (��' 1�}v�.► L � �� , �1 3 9� —�1�Ic� � C � s�o..,,, �,, ��.�,;,j; � �, �,�.�- �� .�� '��' ��L�� 9� ��`1 2. � c� ,�"�3 i ar�-��l�� %f' � � � .I>. ,� r',�� -��,'�/ S� �P��w�'�- °s- 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED Page 2 of.YJ'►N 2 5 2�02 BUILDING DIVISION �'�-.--.�� 1�1�1�1 �� lrl�l�l� Tl9 i�� lr��l�l IJl��R I��dV 35A.1�.120 (60% Petition -East Renton Plateau Annexation) TO: TI� CIT'�' C�UNCIL OF THE CITY OF l�EN'I'�N 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60°Io) in value according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, or real property located contiguous to the City of Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to ihe �ity of Renton. ti map ��xnibit i j and iegal descriptian (Exi�ibii 2 j are included as �art of t111S DP.�?�in:l. In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14120 on October 12, 1998. The City Council then determined that the City would accept the proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree to: (1) Submit the 10% Notice of Intent Petition as an intent to annex; (2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the subject property; (3) Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan designations as they affect the subject property; and (4) Assume their proportional share of the pre-existing City bonded indebtedness. all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. tivl�FcC,Fvt�E, the undersigneci property owners petition the City Council and ask: (a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and (b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the above described territory to become part of the City of Rentori, Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force, and to receive City public services. CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED Page 10�� 2 5 2��2 BUILDING DIVIS�ON , . This two page form page is one of a number of identical forms which comprise one petition seeking the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated, and may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures. WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Nantes o/'petitioners should be in identical fonn as the sa�ne that appear on record in the chain of title to t/ie real estate.) Tax Lot Legal No. Signature and Mailing Description Date Printed Name Address cLot,B�o�,Plar,Assessor's No.or Qther) � ��.. - �ti�36- i�� z�3`1�1�v-�� - �� 1. ��/r5'� I �o ► Ri,�lro.J��IA ��vj� �� '�c1`L,i -ti�t7 - �� i(, Sr1Af�U�� '1� � t� �L7.., ..J� 2. �L�3�7,� -_7.3;r .�� 3. 4. 5. 5. 7. 8. 9. CITY OF FENTON _ RECEIVED JAN 2 5 2002 Page 2 of 2 BUILDING DIVISION ,�,...� � �E�I��I�T TO 1,NI�T�+ X TO �� CI�� O� �l�TTt�I�T LJNI��IZ IZCdV 35A.14.120 (60% Petition -East Renton Plateau Annexation) TO: THE CIT�' COUNCIL OF THE CI'I'Y OF I�ENT�l�t 200 Mil] Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60°Io) in value according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, or real property located contiguous to the City of Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the �ity of Tcentoa. I� map (Exhibit i j ana iegal descripti�n (�,xi�ibii 2j are included as part of t�3iS 17�r1:?�??. In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14120 on October 12, 1998. The City Council then determined that the City would accept the proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree to: (1) Submit the 10% Notice of Intent Petition as an intent to annex; (2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations far the subject property; (3) Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan designations as they affect the subject property; and (4) Assume their proportional share of the pre-existing City bonded indebtedness. all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. Wi�RC,Fvt�r;, the undersigned property owners petition the City Council and ask: (a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and (b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the ��TY OF RENTON above described territory to become part of the City of Renton, R E C E i V E D Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force, and to receive City public services. �AN Z 5 ZOOZ BUILDING DIVISION Page 1 of 2 � � , This two page form page is one of a number of identical forms which comprise one petition seeking the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated, and may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures. WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not quali�ed to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitiazers should be in identical form as the same diat appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.) Tax Lot Legal No. Signature and Mailing Description Date Printed Name Address tLoc,Bloc,Plat,Assessor's No.or other) 1. �a v� ` . J �� s��'�" ��' � � � �c�1aQ.�. 1�' �� '� � a ' �.�� 7 `l�' '� �� 2. �� v �.,��l � 3. 4. 5. 5. 7. 8. 9. RECEIVED JAN 2 5 2002 Page 2��ILDING DIVISION SHAMROCK ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South half(1/2)of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter and the North half(1/2) of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the South half(1/2)of the North half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10, EXCEPT the North 132 feet thereof; AND the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, of Section 11,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,King County, ' Washington. �% . CITY OF RENTON Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Planning Tanner;Mayor Susan Carlson,Administratar J ary 7,2002 Mark Holland Pacific Land Consulting,Inc. 13619 Mukilteo Speedway �3ll� Lynnwood,WA 98037 S� • CK ANNEXATION 60% INTENT TO ANNEX DEADLINE Dear Mark, . As we discussed this morning by phone the time to complete the 60%Intent to Annex Petition expires on February 2�,2002. As you undoubtedly are aware there are two provisions in the Revised Code of Washington that affect the timeliness and sufficiency of petitions to annex. RCW 35 01.040 Sufficiency of petitions. Whenever in this title petitions are required to be signed and filed, the following ricles shall govern the suffcciency thereof.• (8) Signatures followed by a date of signing which is more than six months prior to the date of filing of the petition shall be stricken. RCW 36.9y.09a Filing notice of pro�s�sea'actions wrth Boundary Xeview Bo�r� Whenever any of the following descrilied actions are proposed in a county in which a board has been established, the initiators of the action shall file within one hundred eighty days a notice of intention with the board: (1) The: (a) Creation, incorporation, or change in the boundary, other than a consolidation, of any city, town or special purpose district; I have enclosed a copy of letter we prepared in response to the Johnson Annexation community meeting and some other materials related to the cost of municipal versus county services. I am also enclosing a copy of the list of owners we have for the proposed annexation area per your request. � Please call if you have questions. Sincerely, ✓ Don Erickson,AICP � Senior Planner Attachments cc: Rebecca Lind ��' �°`°'n`°�'�� R E N T O N 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 �This paper contains 50%recycled material,30�post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U RV E �ti � CITY OF RENTON � : V '��•, �---�,, � 1055 South Grady Way -Renton,Washington 98055 �Ap � � �� w # � � � 0 .803 ADDRESS SERVICE R�QUESTED � PBME7ER : ` ]��J�9�i U�$• PpSTdGE � i�^'�_�#!+"+�,'�--�--y t � � JAN 1 ¢ 2002 i � �� Mark Holland Pacific Land Consulting, inc. 136 p .►3 Lynn 8�� o��'`�s.��.� - , ��j"�M�:� •^�'�Y•'-'�•�- +�1�t3J1[Il��tltt�il}tltiltftl!!!1lltl�iDlllt�!!l137IJItflftli Donald Erickson - RE: Status on Shamrock 60% Petition Process Page 1� From: "Mark Holland" <Mark.Pacificland@Verizon.net> To: "Don Erickson" <Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 11/27/01 3:59PM Subject: RE: Status on Shamrock 60% Petition Process Donald I talked with Mike Ramano who is processing the platt for Dreamcraft Homes, within the Shamrock annexation area and he said it was going to be a conflict for them to sign the petition now. They are processing through King Co. Do you concur? Also I sent you an earlier email requesting the list of the people that attended the meeting. Can you mail or fax that to 425 696-0284.Thanks.........Mark -----Original Message----- From: Donald Erickson [mailto:Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:49 PM To: mark.pacificlandC�3verizon.net Subject: Status on Shamrock 60% Petition Process Hi Mark. In order for us to ensure that we will have sufficient processing time for this annexation I will need to know when you estimate you will be ready to submit the 60% petition form. Hope you had a good summer. I can be reached by phone at 1-425-430-6581. � . City of Renton STAFF Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and REPORT Strategic Planning ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE July 31, 2001 Project Name Shamrock Annexation R-5 Rezone Applicant Mark Holland, Pacific Land Consulting File Number LUA-01-084, A, R, ECF Project Manager pon Erickson Project Description The applicant, Pacific Land Consulting, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of this 66.16-acre annexation site from King County s R-4 Zone to Renton's R-5 Zone. The site is located approximately 600' north of NE 4`h Street and is bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the east by 150`h Avenue SE, if extended, and on the north by SE 121 St Street, if extended. 148th Avenue SE traverses the annexation site on a north/south axis. SE 124th Street (NE 6th Place) intersects 148t" Avenue SE on the east. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger in size. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21 C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's R-5 zoning the ± 66 acre site could theoretically accommodate approximately 260 dwelling units, assuming 5 du/net acre. Because of steep slopes and a designated wetland within the rezone area the actual number of units allowed may be less than 260 units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Rural land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Project Location The 66.16 acre site located to the west, north, east and south of the intersection of 148'h Avenue SE and SE 124th Street Exist. Bldg. Area gsf N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf N/A Site Area 66.16 acres Total Building Area gsf N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance for this non-project rezone. Project Location Map ERC report 07-3I-Ol.doc City of Renton EDNSP Department Environmental Review Committee Staff Report ' SHAMROCKANNEXATIONR-SREZONE LUA-01-084 A R ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JULY 31�',2001 Page2 of 3 B. RECOMMENDAT/ON Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERM/NATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGN/FICANCE-MITIGATED. X Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGAT/ON MEASURES None proposed. Impacts from Renton's R-5 zoning are considered comparable to King County's R-4 zoning. This non-project legislative action should not result in changes of use or physical development that would not otherwise occur. Subsequent development at the project level is anticipated to go through environmental review unless otherwise SEPA exempt. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental informafion provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmenta/determinations. D. ENV/RONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following non-project environmental review addresses only those impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Transporfafion Imqacts: None identified for this non-project legislative action. Because Renton's R-5 zoning (5 du/net acre) is comparable to King County's R-4 zoning (4 du/gross acre) the number of vehicie trips that could be generated is assumed to be comparable. Generally, low density single-family detached residential is assumed to create ± 10 Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends per dwelling unit. Miticlation Measures: At the time of a project action impacts, if any, can be better assessed and better addressed. Nexus: Not applicable. 2. Water Impacts: None identified for this non-project legislative action Mitigation Measures: At the time of a project action impacts, if any,can be better assessed and better addressed. Nexus: Not applicable. 3. Other impacts: None identified for this non-project legislative action Mitigation Measures: At the time of a project action impacts, if any, can be better assessed and better addressed. ERC report 07-31-01.doc City of Renton EDNSP Department Environmental Review Committee Staff Report � SfiANIROCKANNEXATTONR-SREZONE LUA•01-084 A R ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JULY 31 ST 2001 Page3 of i E. COMMENTS OF REVIEW/NG DEPARTMENTS The proposa/ has been circu/ated to City Departmental / Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicab/e, these comments have been incorporated into the fext of this report as Mifigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are confained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 20 , 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ERC report 07-31-01.doc i Donald Erw kson - Part.000------------------_--- ----------- ---- - --- Page 1 ' . , r - --- - - --- - - — _ -- - --- ---� � , � I � I don't know what a"party of recard" involves,however here is my address: 12004 148th AVE SE Renton WA 98059 li You just hit on some keywords that really make me NOT want Renton to annex our area. Curbs, ; Sidewalks, Sewer, and change of water. I do not want this to become a city neighborhood. � Most of my neighbors feel the same way! Just by repaving this street,it has turned into a major � i road with travellers doing 60MPH. It is a 30 MPH road. � >From: "Donald Erickson" >To: >Subject: Re: LUA-01-084,A,R/Shamrock Annexation and Rezone>Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:38:26-0700>>Thank you for your recent email to our offices. I was unaware that any of our official notices were posted on the internet. I am currently checking into that. The comments that were due on July 6th were those relating to the Notice of Application. This notice was regarding the probable issuance of a determination of non- significance for the prezone of the site from the County's R-4 Zone to Renton's R-5 Zone,if and when the subject annexation is approved. (The density allowed under the County's R-4 Zone and Renton's R-5 are exactly the same since the County calculates its density based upon number of i dwelling units per "gross" acre and Renton calculates its density based upon "net" acre. Typically � a "net" acre is 80% of a"gross" acre.)>The comments that were due on August 20th pertained to ; filing an appeal of the Environmental Review Committee's decision of July 31st to issue a n environmental Determination of Non-significance for the proposed non-project rezone to R-5, 'I upon annexation. Such appeals require a$75 filing fee and are filed with the City's Hearing I Examiner. >It is unfortunate that you believe the City is more pro-development than King County. The County has designated the subject site and much of the surrounding area far"urban" development and directed cities adjacent to these "potential annexation areas" to annex them as quickly as possible over the next few years as sewer and other services become available. One of the main differences between the County and the City is that Renton's development standards are generally stricter than those found in the County. Renton, for example, requires full street improvements with sidewalks curbs and gutters and in most cases secondary emergency vehicle access. Many developers prefer to vest their plats in the County before annexing into the City to get sewer and water,because the County typically allows them to build a less expensive product. f I� We believe that our standards will result in development that will endure longer and provide a !i higher level of protection of residents'property values. >Currently taxes are about the same I between the City and County, although the City typically provides a higher level of service than I� one now receives from the County. >Thank you for sharing your views with us. If you would like ; to be made a Party of Record please send me a copy of your mailing address. >>»> "r c" ' 08/15/O1 10:34AM»>>> ! Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com i � Donald Erickson - Mime.822 Page 1 --�---, — « 1 Received:from hotmail.com (f19.1aw7.hotmail.com[216.33.237.19]) by mail.ci.renton.wa.us; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 08:26:18-0700 Received:from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 08:30:22-0700 Received:from 64.40.41.45 by Iw7fd.law7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 15:30:22 GMT � X-Originating-IP: [64.40.41.45] From: "r c" <rk childsC�?hotmail.com> To: DericksonC�?ci.renton.wa.us Bcc: Subject: Re: LUA-01-084,A, R/Shamrock Annexation and Rezone � Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 08:30:22-0700 f Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type:texUhtml Message-ID: <F19UBPcZi7lmrvoGdK000002692C�hotmail.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Sep 2001 15:30:22.0579(UTC) FILETIME=[2B375430:01C13D32] <html><div style='background-color:'><DIV> <P>I don't know what a"party of record"involves, however here is my address:dP> <P>12004 148th AVE SE<BR>Renton WA 98059dP> <P>You just hit on some keywords that really make me NOT want Renton to annex our area.  Curbs, Sidewalks, Sewer,and change of water.   I do not want this to become a city � neighborhood.  Most of my neighbors feel the same way! Just by repaving this street,it has turned into a major road with travellers doing 60MPH.  It is a 30 MPH road.</P> <P><BR><BR> </P></DI V> <DIV></DIV> j <DIV>dDIV>>From: "Donald Erickson"<DERICKSONC�3CI.RENTON.WA.US> ' <DIV></DIV>>To:<RK_CHILDS�HOTMAIL.COM> <DIV></DIV>>Subject: Re: LUA-01-084,A, R/Shamrock Annexation and Rezone <DIV>dDIV>>Date:Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:38:26-0700 <D I V></D I V>> <DIV>dDIV>>Thank you for your recent email to our offices. I was unaware that any of our official notices were posted on the internet. I am currently checking into that.The comments that were due on July 6th were those relating to the Notice of Application.This notice was regarding the probable issuance of a determination of non-significance for the prezone of the site from the County's R-4 Zone to Renton's R-5 Zone, if and when the subject annexation is approved. (The density allowed under the County's R-4 Zone and Renton's R-5 are exactly the same since the County calculates its density based upon number of dwelling units per"gross"acre and Renton calculates its density based upon "neY'acre.Typically a"net" acre is 80%of a"gross"acre.) <DIV></DIV>>The comments that were due on August 20th pertained to filing an appeal of the Environmentai Review Committee's decision of July 31 st to issue a n environmental Determination of Non-significance for the proposed non-project rezone to R-5, upon annexation. Such appeals require a $75 filing fee and are filed with the City's Hearing Examiner. <DIV>dDIV>>it is unfortunate that you believe the City is more pro-development than King County.The County has designated the subject site and much of the surrounding area for"urban"development and directed cities adjacent to these"potential annexation areas"to annex them as quickly as possible over the next few years as sewer and other services become available.One of the main differences between the County and the City is that Renton's development standards are generally stricter than those found in the County. Renton,for example, requires full street improvements with sidewalks curbs and gutters and in most cases secondary emergency vehicle access. Many developers prefer to vest their plats in the County before annexing into the City to get sewer and water,because the County typically allows them to build a less expensive product.We believe that our standards will result in development that will endure longer and provide a higher level of protection of residents'property values. <DIV></DIV>>Currently taxes are about the same between the City and County,although the City typically provides a higher level of service than one now receives from the County. f � k � � Donald Erickson - Re: LUA-01-084, A, R/Shamrock Annexation and Rezone Page 1 .� --- , From: "r c" <rk childs@hotmail.com> To: <Derickson(�ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 9/14/01 8:27AM Subject: Re: LUA-01-084, A, R/Shamrock Annexation and Rezone 16/15/2001 20: 48 425-254-9283 KATHY&WALTJOHNSON PAGE 01 . ,� � ._...... �� ,�� w r�.'�"� � � � � OCT 1 6 2001 � � -i,v�vi.,�m�G uc�t�vr•,riu�l7, NEIGHRORHOObS. AND STRATEGIC PLANNING ( � � W� r G%v�wl�`'' � < < \ / ? ` .�o% � � r � � � I .� / �� J � � � 2' S �" ��D - �..��D z��-- z � 7� 8' 3 / � � O ; �� /� 10/15/2001 20: 48 425-254-9283 KATHY&WALTJOHNSON PAGE 02 Kathy: Please use the�etter to help you with yotrr case for City annexation. Please drop a line if we can help in any way. Pete Differdiz�g 10/15/2001 20: 48 425-254-9283 KaTHY�waLTJOHNSON PAGE 03 Pete Differdin�g 726 San Clemente AVE Sunnyside WA 98944 cos te uicktel.com Kathy Jo�nson �2006 142nd AVE SE Renton WA 98059 Deaz iv�rs. Johnson Niy Brother and � appreciate you�concern with the annexation into the city. I along with my Brothez we give our cast �or the annexation. We appreciate the go and drive you have to get the laz�d into city. We �ike the Idea so that the city caz� improve the condition iz�the area, with a New City sewer l��e and sidewatks. 7'he conditio� in the area for private sewers cannot be good for the environment. Thez�e are hard soils that didn't let a lot o�'the land�erk. Most likely there wasn't many condition or starxdards in the SOs and 60s so private sewers were put �n causing problems. Without sidewalks and road improvements as new homes are built we caza expect narrow roads with no sidewalks. Thas cannot be go�d because eventually the city will be there. Then improvements will be happening digging up your froz�t yard to put sewers and sidewalks in. So zxxuch for your nxce �andscaped fxon,t yazd that was put in 10 yeazs ago. We kn�ow that improveznents should be done first not after a new homes are already bwilt. 1`hank you Sincerely: �� C I t l � / U Pete Differdi�g Gary Differding Donald Erickson - Re: Status on Shamrock 60% Petition Process Page 1 From: "markholland" <mark.pacificland@verizon.net> To: "Donald Erickson" <DericksonC�ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 9/27/01 8:45AM Subject: Re: Status on Shamrock 60% Petition Process Donald, we are proceeding ahead and I will be now starting on the 60%filing and will keep in touch. Thanks for staying on top of this.........Mark -----Original Message ----- From: "Donald Erickson" <DericksonC�ci.renton.wa.us> To: <mark.pacificlandC�3verizon.net> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:49 PM Subject: Status on Shamrock 60% Petition Process Hi Mark. In order for us to ensure that we will have sufficient processing time for this annexation I will need to know when you estimate you wili be ready to submit the 60% petition form. Hope you had a good summer. I can be reached by phone at 1-425-430-6581. �; ,� CITY OF RENTON ..t� Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 22, 2001 Mr. Mark Holland Pacific Land Consulting, Inc. 13619 Mukilteo Speedway Lynnwood, WA 98037 SUBJECT: Shamrock Annexation and Rezone Project No. LUA-01.-084,A,R Dear Mr. Holland: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-6581. For the Environmental Review Committee, �`�ti"�- � Donald Erickson Senior Planner cc: Parties of Record: K. Wilson, M. Schirman, C. Wolf, T. Waters, � D. Shenk, L. Shenk, J. Waltosz, M. Moore, C. Donnelly, P. Waters ,.��`�� 1 1055 South Crrady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 `';�;, y ,.,��` .,a�`� �This paper contains 50%recycled matenal,30%post consumer �.��'�]��.� � , . .. ..... .�:. . . _ _. .. _. Donald Erickson -Shamrock Properties . _ _ _ _ _ Page 1 From: Sara Slatten <sslatten C camwest.com> To: "'dericksonCci.renton.wa.us"' <derickson@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 7/26/01 10:28AM Subject: Shamrock Properties Helio Don, I met with you last week and we spoke about the Shamrock property annexation. You said that you could email the aerial file for the area to me upon request. If you could email the file to me at sslattenC�camwest.com, I would appreciate it. Are you aerials current and/or do you have historical aerials on file? Any info you could send me would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Sara Slatten � CamWest Development, Inc. (425) 825-1955 1 1 1 � 1 � � � ��t�� iili �.-��_ ..■ ��. ■ , �N �� '�i �� ■ �� , � : % �� ' ■- - - - �`� ., � , � ' �- : Ii i �_ . _ --�■ 'I�f� 177-1:=I�� 1/��,11� �� ' III � . � 1► ��, iY�10��i� �� .�7—� . .. .- � y� � ►�1�� iili ��"� : :: :� ■ �I/�% � �� IIII�i`� "' . .. . • 1i ��11�►� 111111= — " � �,� � � �� !� � � �� 4 (') —_ � � � � �� , � �� '�I/ � �� i �� I_ :, � �I� ��. �� ___ � � r�e i� ri►� � �� J � � [1 e� �Ra��rr�� . T� T.7R!!� [� ',i �i�i=�l ��i�i;�� u �su�au.L � �u�u /�.� --�� = .•- � � i �� u �� i �11�. � �y ■�I�I �A � MI� ��_� " ��'� �'� ` �� i ��.� �� i � �� : 111111 C�� `��•��L�L -��,■ � r•a� �r�r �w ��] ��a� �� rr,� n � �IR� � � 111111�-� �"' �� y� ca �r:� rr L'L� �� . � ` �� `7 ��7� �-:.i r.� u l:�1 ��ll n��m� �1 � ■ � � �■ ";�� ' ' tl �!� � I I!' �� _ �u�� c.tai � lil �� , . _� � ��-�� R:1 �' . � �,� � � � -� -_ � ��. . � . .�- . � r�� .*�: � : :: : ��,: .. .. ��iii: ��:��F�� ■ ., , � •• .,,,.,- � .,iii�. ii �� .�„- ------ _� . .�, � � �■ � i _ _ �� , . '� ,��■ ;I �:I�r� �� : ■ - . �� . .� � ■ _ �, . . . � �i , ,� : � ,� i� , �� .��l� � � �� ....� . � � �•• , ��I� �... . ,� - �� •• .. !� � � ►�� ■ �111111111111: �� .��__ � I/II�E� �� /��; ��■�i : �� `i■a�� \��3 : �� 11�1/�� i� �J=� ►■ ��II - ' :;��■�■� - ��F� _ . - � � ■ ■ !�i�� -�-�� %/11�� - �� ■ �■��1�� :�D � 1�� , - , � �11�;�� I�3�3�� ..N � ��`��',�� ►��' , =� ■■� - (,,��,�� ;� _ =: f�L�,711s �' ,�;� �� ♦ � � � �� t�: w��A � � � �� ' �� !�,�� '- �� II�� E�l�i:a�os�� :11��1 ��,, �� , � .. ,. �■.,.d �� E��iiw��', � . .�... . i�� A � QI��• �.��=�' �� r�� , I/ 1 �� . E�:��i�s� � ��r��;�� , _ _ ■r� :� '►`�� =`r�• r�� ■�.. �.� �■. �� . ., ��11�1�� ■ �� :� �� .�Ii i��'r`y7�i� � �� ■ � �� ►�� ■ ■ ,�� I �� :!.; ��L� �� i� ii ��I�� r �� ■ � ��r� 1�� i� ��j�� :� ��ri�, � i: �� : 1 ,,��,��:��IL'��E�� I�� .� ��r .r �� C�iL� � ■ �� y �IIIIIIIG :� �; •►�� .� �„ ��i1 �, �� I/� �� i �� ►�� C� C� �� i� i ��a �'� �I -� ��I�.�� ►�1�? �� .� ��ie �� .y .��,� � i��/= Q7iQ�J1E�� ' . . . ,. , .., - _ : , , . , , :. � . � � : �- '� ' ' • : � . � , . � _ - �. . . 1 111 111 �� . . .. -. . - . . . �::::�:>:»::::::>:::::::::::::::::::;::;: .::;.:::;:;:,;<:.<:. June 27, 2001 Mr. Donald Erickson,AICP Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Project Name: LUA-01-084,A,R/Shamrock Annexation and Rezone We, the undersigned residents of the proposed annexation�wish to be made parties of record in the above mentioned proposed project. We do not wish to become part of the City of Renton because we do not like the Renton has dealt with the surrounding are since its incorporation not long ago. We do not want higher population density, especially without greatly improved infrastructure. As indicated by the lack of adequate setbacks to accommodate wider roads in the new developments along what used to be 128t"Ave. SE (now NE 4�'), no plans are in the works on that front. We oppose higher ta�ces to pay for things like renaming streets to suit the whims of city planners (e.g. Nile Ave., Jericho Ave....etc.). The King County street grid makes sense and has been in place for many years. Existing residences and businesses should not have to bear the burden of address changes if they are not moving—this is ridiculous. We are also aware that as Renton's boundaries expand, the impact fees coll�cted from these new developments will be used to fund Renton schools and other projects when many of the students in this area will be attending Issaquah schools. This issued was brought up during the proposed Briarwood incorporation, but as far as we are aware, nothing has changed. We do not think adequate thought is being given to environmental and quality of life issues in the development and permitting process, either. Those of us who have lived here a good portion of our lives like the way the tracts of forest break up the monotony, and appreciate that they provide habitat for birds, deer, raccoons and other creatures that have adapted to living near humans, but need natural places for bedding down, nesting, etc. These forest tracts also act to abate storm water run off and soil erosion, while providing natural filters for pollution caused by the very developments for which they are being razed. We appreciate you taking the time to read this and would like some confirmation that it has been received and entered into the record. Rest assured that we are not the only ones in this area with these concerns. Sincerely, i,,� ./,��/;j ,/,� �- � , 1 sP9��,� �Y � '71's-c.ez'i.�''n-Xe�=�"t.�'/Ctt�� (�'�C�t�� _' ohn Pavlik Kristen Scott-Pavlik Sharon Scott Erik SCro Please send correspondence to: Scott/Pavlik Household 12610 148t"Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059-4805 (425) 226-7790 ;,�R.___� Mr. Erickson Concerning project LUA-Ol-084,A,R/SHAMROCK ANNEXATION AND REZONE. '� The annexation of this piece appears to me to be contributing to the creation of an island of King County within the city of Renton.I see this as a potential burden on future annexations for a limited number of land-owners. I would like to see these large annexations contribute to the elimination of this potential island( see enclosed map/diagram) by either including this potential area in their annexation or refrain from enclosing this area. � I am also concerned for the wetlands on this piece as recorded on king county documents. Thank you for your consideration on these matters. Kenneth E Kiger 11826 142�ave. se Renton Wa. 98059 , . � G Gtff--o/-od�;� RE�� JUL 3 2001 ECONOMIC DEV��pp�ENT, NEIGHBpR}ipp� AND STqqTEG1,�p�q�,�,� 10415 - 147th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 July 1, 2001 Don Erickson,AICP Development Services Division 1055 S.Grady Way Renton, WA �055 RE: Shamrock Annexation and Issaquah School Distria Dear Mr. Ericicson: -w �. �. � i would like to cornment on this proposed annexation by the City of Renton. � A portion of this annexation area is in the Issaquah Sc�iool District. With previous Renton�nexations and new Renton developments springing up out here like wild fi�e,Apollo Elementary, Maywood Middle and Liberty School are over capaaty. In order to bring additional rooms to these already remodeled sd�ools,the Issaquah School District wiN have to bring in portables. This is a direct resuft of the City of Renton's lack of concem as to what these developments are dang to this a�ea's schools. Has a study been done to what the impact of this annexation will have on the schools of the area? What does the City of Renton intend to do to help the Issaquah Sdiool District with this problem, a problem that has been caused, in part, by Renton's huge appetite for more developments? Thank you for answering my questions. Sincerely, �,�c�,�� n� Claudia Donnelly l cc: Issaquah School Board Renton City Counal �y ,.� CITY OF RENTON ••� Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 31, 2001 * • Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on July 31, 2001: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE SHAMROCK ANNEXATION LUA-01-084,A,R The applicant, Pacific Land Consulting, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of this 66.16-acre annexation site from Kin�County's R-4 Zone to Renton's R-5 Zone. The site is located approximately 600' north of NE 4 Street and is bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the east by 150�h Avenue SE, if extended, and on the north by SE 121 St Street, if extended. 148th Avenue SE traverses the annexation site on a north/south axis. SE 124th Street (NE 6th Place) intersects 148th Avenue SE on the east. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger in size. Location: The 66.16 acre site located to the west, north, east and south of the intersection of 148th Avenue SE and SE 124th Street. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 2ptn 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner a�e governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-6581. r the Environmental Re ' C mittee, Donald Erickson , Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) US Army Corp. of Engineers Washinaten�tacP1 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 �This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer ;y ,.� CITY OF RENTON ..�t Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 31, 2001 Mr. Mark Holland Pacific Land Consulting, Inc. 13619 Mukilteo Speedway Lynnwood, WA 98037 SUBJECT: Shamrock Annexation and Rezone Project No. LUA-01-084,A,R Dear Mr. Holland: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on July 31, 2001, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non- Significance. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmentaf checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to tF�e public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 2ptn 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-6581.. For the Environmental Review C m ittee, � . Dona rickson Project Manager cc: Parties of Record: K.Wilson, M. Schirman, C.Wolf, T.Waters, D. Shenk, L. Shenk, J.Waltosz, M. Moore, C. Donnelly, P. Waters ,�.,�.�o+,o. 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 �This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-01-084,A,R APPLICANT: Mark Holland, Pacific Land Consulting PROJECT NAME: Shamrock Annexation DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Pacific Land Consulting, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of this 66.16-acre annexation site from King County's R-4 Zone to Renton's R-5 Zone. The site is located approximately 600' north of NE 4th Street and is bounded on the west b� Jericho Avenue NE, if ex�ended, on the east by 150 Avenue SE, if extended, and on the north by SE 121 t Stree� if extended. 148t Avenue SE traverses the annexation site on a north/south axis. SE 124th Street(NE 6t Place) intersects 148th Avenue SE on the east. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger in size. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The 66.16 acre site located to the west, north, east and south of the intersection of 148th Avenue SE and SE 124�h Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 2ptn, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: August 6, 2001 DATE OF DECISION: July 31, 2001 SIGNATURES: 3 0 re im rman ministrator DAT Departme f P nning/Building/Public Works ��3��c�I i J m Shepherd, Admi strator DAT ommunity Services Department ,�``� �' ,�� , /� /� %��, � �J I� � .�' Lee , � eler, e hief DATE Re on Fire Department dnssign NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. SHAMROCK ANNEXATION LUA-01-084,A,R Proposed rezoning of 66.16-acre annexation site from King County's R-4 Zone to Renton's R-5 Zone. Location: to the west, north, east and south of the intersection of 148'h Avenue SE and SE 124'h Street. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 2p`n 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Publication Date: August 6, 2001 Account No. 51067 dnspub ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION SHAMROCK ANNEXATION - LUA-01-084,A,R The applicant,Pacific Land Consulting,has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of this 66.16-acre annexation site from King Countys R-4 Zone to Renton's R-5 Zone.The site is located approximately 600'north of NE 4`h Street and is bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE,if extended, on the east by 150th Avenue SE,if extended,and on the north by SE 121°S Street, if extended. 14gtn Avenue SE traverses the annexation site on a north/south axis. SE 124`h Street(NE 6`h Place)intersects 148`h Avenue SE on the east. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typicaliy 2.0 acres or larger in size. Location: The 66.16 acre site located to the west,north,east and south of the intersection of 148th Avenue SE and SE 124'h Street THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 20t", 2001. Appeais must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-430-6510. �•' Pro osed Shamrock Annex�,tion tt t � � � s w � � L d' 124th PI L .0 I � � h PI O- - N h St h St z E 1 nd t 2n St � E 1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. . — - -��'t � �' �, �� ` ,, ' ��'o�i��=�'�ii� ' �. � � : , � « �w , - � �� `' "°� � �-'' ` ",,i,�.��i�I�C'��4 �f *� � f .� .i � - �, �� '� � e" • � �..� "°iL` ..�i .J _.w�c i.� � � . � ��. ..+`! _.. .. ,� CL7 f� �� ^'r ,�,.�...f,. �' , n . �_ ��:��1 �iia�:i�a!lp��K�,�c��I�� +. � :: � �� s�b � jy� ��1 I.��R't1 x��1�.R�`IA„�� .� �4�� G e� t. � �1/-w'qf' � r. � u� � .�, :Y+�t.,� ��it��l�p� „r ' `+;�c�.c � .� ,'�.�a.. ,. .w, ��`� . � ,�, �-- '�-��:� t�� ; � '„' �� x ,�,"'q '+ �.� , ;r5^�� .. �`�.��he ��yNy.r. « �� . .. f l i, �� .7 — � ��R�' ' . � r ' � � � �� w ,� � +IJAdLit � � . �,�' �� ?� � � ( r:� +.4.. �x i�'�}i � y5 �.,,� '� � � +� .(�Qj(., _ 4 v ,t ,� ' �,�'�'r -�r . . �i ;` � .�,� -Y_, ,� � +�� `�� ,�r��_�MF. 3'� �yz � w �� (Vl1l�S *�+t .. �� y . . ,� ��Gil�� ,�� :�r�'r*,'�I ,� '�r ��"�;L� , M�r r�� i ��n�,� , jC� ��'�°�.�'�'' .,�: .� ;�"��,s;�,�:: ��' _ � �x ' ; '�.��<t� ..�� . t, l;.i M .MS. ' u�� . � �� ' -��r�,p�� ".T ".� ' � � ` a� '�"� �. 1� �'� � 3 �.y � r, `1'a, ,;� .X* '� `��'�f `��"<" - �..__�, •y ��„�k�I�� y�' r !A� � ' �" �� :'�� .,� j ��• ` � ��i s i"e L"�� /I�R"� a .^ .,i Y. n,.�t � � ;� +g }�� Y�� t'.aZ�I./� �h t � �4� 'f-`�� Y! j `��. � 7 � ��S , . � �k`. ^jr�;� +�r t�� !� -..t� �,�z` '� . � ' � � r �� 'L' "c - y��g�i iA� �1i � ,�r�d,#'�� r,>,� +t." �;"�� PS� �ji ,ti,�li� �ws1 � , , _.� . ��i - � A� 'r r .. ! ��; �,� h t.d�, �� i � �� E.� �i .. ""s � j`X�� -•� � ' � - x"r'RYift ..� t1.' *� � 9'.' � �� x�..� .,l..,i.. j(�� •J!. �,� A� . «, ♦ t T " f . � ``--' � 3 � .��.: .,�t^!'` _ . �� i.+ � �E= �� ,y: „%1� , ,�„�r - -- �_ K '�3�.�*�.e .`'xo� il � ` , � � � �� +t s�� ,~ — _ r � ,��' ��1� � �� ,� �� `�'�,�.rt �;�, ,,,��:.«� �120' . , , � , �� 1 �� ,�� .� . __ _ /�� . �. �'�� ` . -: �. �;� �'i� _ - . -- � .�"�i�a �� . � :`� s'i01.�� r� �' � �,l � r� �,� +. �� q�_� .`e �,'s a�t6�i � �:i�LX�: t�,��Fr R� �4. '"�R i J II�`��^�t:��.; v`� >"�, ,''°� '�� t�` j�,,� �..� r �� : t r�1�7�# , � l� ��(� ��s, �'� ` Y �. : Nt �� t `3�'-. �1` -^a� `y -- :, � �� '1_ "�r �� Y �� a,.. �#; �; � y�l . a{ r 1 " 1„- � ;'� � s r� --"' ,�,u '�� _ '�► �:',,�'j� .it.y� �� :� �, � ��,�.i�f$� �t� ' g1.4 . `^_��1 .:�, � �� . V'�"��.�R� 3S"� - .'� • -, � . . � —;y�'�t�t= ��'-p�>:i�.. . Xt' '"�w� �� .. �4r'�(�� 1Mft�. 3 = �r'� {��, .�,.�*�� , �.., i�. t t� rY� �� #_� ..�µ"�l"' �i:j :-r�1 Vi ' ,�yr'Is'i{ �!. t� a � '� � £�'4 �� .,is� iw �-�'i�^:� �A��,� � � _�� ._�" �� _. ��,: �� ` �'24 f�` t ' t `1�1 �..,y� �, _ ,- .. . -�@ �- .� ., � � [� T, g��5� � "r� ,� y' " ti.�� ,�^ � . i "i4, ' ��J '.,'A'�.. _ -- �E�,( � �` �` �: �L�i �� ■ �i E � ` *'r �. ,,,�r,.� ` �I � =`�'6;�s�,� o�l,�i�' ,��i� e` �f ��i�� ' ' - ��. � � ,,� _ � . _ . __� �,e r��r ai� '�n' �cro�i!�" - , , � �f�( !! � �'�-�y• , � a.� , r,� � ` � i�ti Q J '� .. +� �. �� .,, � - ,:,. . � y' � . . _ � �� lii�- �' � � # ` ��y � � at ' --•i,.i . . � �; � ..•.. p }� , �,' � � � �� ;' � ��y'�+`+ �.�,to...e: � �I� �YM��,,�.ai�`,� ��; ��I�j� � - a �"��`8 P�ii�.''.St� � ' � � � R �w.� � � � � : � �t� �.�iti�r�'i j J = li� f�•� '� � �#th PI- . *i�` ��:� �,,: 11" � — — ~ : �-�ry� w� _ �.ti?`��., _ 911 r� - •� ., �! ►r � a��"� '� � . w � � ., . .� =iI11Ifi"ii - a ' 1 r r � ,��a �1�1 � • 'fii�� • � f �f� w__. �� St �� _ .al.�,` ' �� .w :�..,.�. :��-. , r.d � - . .�� .,. � ,.i.�u;k«,•r .• ._��.. ,_ : ' ` �t :.� ...... .�rlli�. ..,.€ ,i . ';�%'•.. , _ � 3!R � � .s � �� .Tr� " � -__�� ;r� R' �lEl `i ,a �1�,'�� I l _�y � �� , ��1 .r.i �. { -F �� _ —� �, I .� ay ' „ � ��,°'1��..�� s � ,.•�� , I f` �� ,+ ��x �1� � ��.e�iu�� II!�! ,11 v IF�aj �!:..� j�, , �`� ,.; ,� s:; af ''!!��;'� �( ` . . ,. �I��t��,� � � ,. � .,�t�� _ .» �� y,y {' � . ,�r �,* "'�a.A ��...., � `�M�r '„««�,, .� I , �',�� '��`�`'4 LL�� ' — � . � i.. � �4 � � f ( f � �� 'Mf � .F ' t.f �' "� ,.,�!:��"' a, f. � . � - - . ,��y.�1 ?�,�..St�°° �� '� ° ' : , ;_ � .� . . �� ;,,� ,, �_ . - ,�' � �'�.�,,fuit�, �t< � ��:. ��,�, , e I�K 3 N i.. �.P . � t ...Ga� ^ � � � �; �� yt iY ��i r �#r;�.. ~- . - • " . 'x a* , 1�� F � �': { � �: 4 4 �i: ..'� r ` ,. _ �iiY-".:T i7f(l-._..� i iri�..�� C r' ^ � " . , . �g ti� ��'"°,;�� c n � � •� ��: ' �� '�' �� l��Ei - �`� d ... � w :�»_�� i�� # '`� �� ■ �� il��ll��ii " �n �-� _ �-: � � �','� - ��„ �+ � � �- ■ �� flj ' ;'��'�� ,�� ` � ��1� �j�'" �3.' 'h► I �� , . , . , �� i y , y ;, , � �� b�� t"��4 � — �` � � � �`�� Proposed Shamrock Annexation o goo 1600 � Figure 2: Aerial Map 1:9 600 , �ti"� o,{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Plwning �� iSting COfpo�ate Boundary .� , s,u c��oo,nam�rn�� Proposed Annexatien Boundary G.Del Rosario �FNT 4 June 2001 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: June 18, 2001 TO: Don Erickson FROM: Karen SUBJECT: New Land Use File Set-Up Please complete the following information to facilitate routing of file and application acceptance. If you have special form requirements or instructions, please write them in the "Comments" section. Project Name: Shamrock Annexation Project Manager: Don Erickson LUA (File) Number: LUA-01-084. +� y o - Applicant: Mark Holland, Pacific Land Consulting, Inc. Acceptance Date: June 18, 2001 Date Circulation Requested: June 21, 2001 Date Comments Due: July b, 2001 Work Order Number: 78848 Function Number: 4190 Project Description: Proposed annexation of approximately 66.16 acres and concurrent rezone from King County's R-4 Zone to Renton's R-5 Zone. The site is located approximately 600' north of NE 4'"Street and bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the east by 150'h Avenue SE, if extended, and on the north by SE 121�Street, if extended. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typicaily 2.0 acres or larger in size. With R-5 zoning the 66.16 acres could theoretically accommodate approximately 260 dwelling units, The annexation is currently going the 10% Notice of Intent to Annex process. Site Location: Intersection of SE 124'"Street and 148'h Avenue SE Site Area: ±66.16 acres Building Area (gross): Not appiicable Estimated ERC Date: July 31�', 2001 HEX Date: Not applicable DOT Notification Required: Yes No Boeing Notification: Yes No School District Letter: Yes No (Lori Pitzer) Renton School Issaquah School Airport Notification: Yes No Comments: Setup . p7-/v o/ � Cify Of Renton ,�!�J ` ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKL/ST S�/� � + ��- �� PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCT/ONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know"or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, fhe governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project,""applicant,"and "property or site"should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Proposed rezone of approximately 60 acre area from King County's R-4 Zone to Renton's Residential 5 du/ac(R-5) Zone. June 18,2001 Page 2 2. Name of applicant: Susan Carlson,Administrator, Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning Department City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contacf person: Address: Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Department City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Contact Person: Don Erickson, AICP (425) 430-6581 4. Date checklist prepared: June 19, 2001 5. Agency requesting checklist: Citv of Renton, Department of Planning/Building/Public Works- Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Adoption of rezone ordinance is anticipated pending SEPA compliance at time of annexation into Renton. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Yes. Applicants have applied for annexation into the City of Renton. Under RCW 43.21.C.222 annexations are specifically exempt from SEPA. Upon annexation into Renton applicants or their successors will likely subdivide and develop properties with single-family dwellings per City of Renton R-5 zoning. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. FEIS on the 1995 Comprehensive Plan of the City of Renton 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No knowledge of other pending governmental approvals of affected properties. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Council apqroval is reQuired for this rezone. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The subiect qroposal is to rezone the non-street portions of the 66.16 acre Shamrock annexation site from King County's R-4, 4 du/gross acre to Renton's R-5, 5 du/net acre zone. The site could accommodate approximately 225 dwelling units. Because Renton's density is based upon net acreage (80% of gross) the number of units is virtually identical whether County of City zoning is used. June 18, 2001 Page 3 12. LoCation of the proposal. Give su�cient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal wou/d occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, sife p/an, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonab/y availab/e. While you should submit any p/ans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicafe maps or detailed p/ans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The subject annexation site is located approximately 600' north of NE 4th Str�et and bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the east by 150` Avenue SE, if extended, and on the north by SE 121St Street, if extended. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. 148th Avenue SE and SE 124�h intersect in the eastern half of the site. B. ENV/RONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The 66.16-acre site is rollinp beinp relativelv flat on its western.half and then risinQ approximatelv 15-feet in elevation in its middle, near 148 Avenue SE. The eastern 25% of the site returns to beinq relativelv flat above elevation 155'. 8. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Renton Slope Maps indicate some slopes of 25% iust west of 148�h Avenue SE. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and nofe any prime farmland. Alderwood (AqC and AgD) qravellv sandv loam (USDA Soil Conservation Service. 19721. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Althouqh there are 25% slopes on the site, these have not been mapqed as unstable soils. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. lndicate source of�ll. Not applicable for this non-qroiect leqislative action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-proiect proposal. Erosion presumably could occur as a result of future development under the proposed R-5 Zone. However, since the density of development under the proposed R-5 Zone is comparable to that allowed under the County's R-4 Zone, there is no anticipated increase in erosion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? No construction is proposed as a result of this non-proiect leqislative proposal. June 18, 2001 Page 4 h. Proposed measures fo reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: No construction is proposed as a result of this non-proiect leqislative rp oposal. Any future development occurring as a consequence of the proposed R-5 Zone would be required to follow management practices in the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Regulations (RMC 4-4-130) and in the Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations (RMC 4-4-060). 2. AIR a. What types of emissions fo the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, indusfrial wood smoke) during construct�on and when the project is complefed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. N/A. No new construction is proposed as a result of this legislative non- project proposal. The amount of development under Renton's R-5 Zone is comparable to that under the County's R-4 Zone. At the time of project level development specific air-related impacts may be identified and appropriate mitigation measures applied. b. Are there any otf-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Not applicable for this non-proiect leqislative action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not applicable for this non-proiect leaislative action. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. Renton's Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map indicates two (2) wetlands on the northern portion of the subject 66.16-acre site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes,please descnbe and attach available plans. Not known at this non-proiect level. 3) Esfimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate fhe source of fill material. N/A. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general descript►on, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. June 18, 2001 Page 5 N/A. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The subject site is not mapped as part of the 1-year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. This is a non-project legislative action. No development is proposed as a result of this proposai. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A. This is a non-project legislative action. The proposed rezone will not result in the discharge or withdrawal of water that is not now occurring. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-prolect leqislative qroqosal. No new septic tanks are anticipated as a result of this rezone. It is anticipated that development that may occur under the City's jurisdiction would connect to sanitary sewers. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. N/A. No construction and therefore runoff is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. Surface water appears to run off the southern portion of the site in a southwesterly direction towards the lower Cedar River Basin and from the northwesterly portion of the site to the May Creek Basin. 2) Could waste maferial enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. Future new residential development would be hooked up to sanitary sewer d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: June 18, 2001 Page 6 Not applicable since this is a non-proiect leqislative action that will not result in any development that would not otherwise occur and/or is covered by SEPA. Future development would be required to comply with City of Renton Drainage Standards (RMC 4-6-030). 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tre a e map aspen, other X evergreen tree fir e a pine, other X s rub X �f� X pasture crop or grain X wet soil plants:cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? N/A. No construction and therefore no vegetation will be removed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known at this time. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Not applicabie. This is a non-project action. As noted above, development that occurs under Renton's jurisdiction must conform to the City's codes and regulations. 5. AN/MALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds ►a � heron, eagle, on bir s other Mammals. ee , bear, elk, beaver, other Fish:bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No known threatened or endanqered species are known to be on or near the site. June 18, 2001 Page 7 c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Unknown, but the entire State of Washington is included within a migration route for birds known as the Pacific Flyway. This flyway, as it overlies Renton, is used by a variety of migratory birds, including, but not limited to the Canada Goose. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: This is a non-project legislative action. No development is proposed as a result of this rezone proposal. Mitigation measures, if any, may be imposed at the time of future development. 6. ENERGYAND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed projecYs energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. It is anticipated that the 225 dwellinq units on the site will use qrimarilv electircal and natural qas resources for heating and runninq aqqliances. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not known. Zoning provides some setbacks and restricts heights of new structures. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. This is a non-proiect leqislative action. Future development occurring on the site will meet all related energy code provisions. 7, ENV/RONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A. This is a non-project legislative action. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A. This is a non-project legislative action. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Not applicable since this is a leqislative non-prolect action. The onlv known reqular source of noise at the present time is that aenerated bv traffic on 148 Avenue SE. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. June 18, 2001 Page 8 Not applicable. No new development is proposed as a direct result of this proposed non-project action. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. This is a non-project action. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The majority of the ± 66 acre site is used for agricuitural and grazing uses. The southeast corner of the site contains a 26-lot subdivision that is about 50% developed. b. Has the site been used for agriculture?If so, describe. Yes, approximately two thirds of the site is currently used for agriculturai purposes. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are an estimated 42 existina sinple-familv dwellinqs on the subject 66.16-acre site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? This is a legislative non-project rezone action. Subsequent development mav involve some demolition and consolidation of parcels. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current Kinq County zoninq classification is the R-4 Zone which ailows 4 du/gross acre. Renton is proposing R-5 zoning that allows 5-du/net acre. The number of units allowed under either zoning is approximately the same assuming net acreage as 80% of gross acreage. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The 66.16 acre site is currently designated "Residential Rural" on Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and "Urban Residential 4-12 du/ac" in King County. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Two wetlands are indicated on this site as shown on Renton's Sensitive Areas Maps. Likewise, steep slopes (25%) are also shown on these same exhibits. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? At full redevelopment under the proposed R-5 zoning it is anticipated that approximatelv 450 residents would reside over these 66.16 acres. June 18, 2001 Page 9 j. Approximafely how many people would the completed project displace? Unknown. This is not a project action. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce disp/acement impacts, if any: Not applicable at this non-project stage. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: As noted above the proposed rezone is compatible with Renton's Residential Rural land use designation. Also, there is no anticipated change of use or new construction proposed as a result of this rezone. Renton's R-5 Zone is comparable to King County's R-4 Zone. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Unknown. This proposed rezone does not have a housing component. It is anticipated that + 225 units could be accommodated on the subject site under this zoning. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Unknown. The proposed rezone will not eliminate any units by itself. As new development occurs some older dwellings may be replaced with new dwellings. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: The proposed zoning is consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and applicable policies for this area. 10. AESTHET/CS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including anfennas; what is the principal exferior building material(s)proposed. Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. No new development is specifically proposed as a result of this change in zoning classification. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Unknown. This is a non-project rezone action. This is not know at this level. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Unknown. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. c. What exisfing off-site sources of lighf or glare may affect your proposal? Unknown. June 18,2001 Page 10 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Parks Divisions of the Community Services Department indicates that the area currently is lacking adequate recreational facilities for new families. This wi�l likely be addressed in more detail at the project levet. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable at this non-proiect level of review. 13. H/STOR/C AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Unknown. 14. TRANSPORTAT/ON a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Currently the subject rezone site is intersected by 148t'' Avenue SE and SE 124th Street. Two dead-end streets, 149"'Avenue SE and 150 Avenue SE provide local access to an existing 26 lot subdivision. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not directly, however there is bus service on NE 4th Street, some 600 feet to the south. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Unknown. Assuming 225 dwelling units and parking being provided between 1.75 spaces per unit and 2.25 spaces per unit, there most likely would be at least 394 to 506 required off-street spaces provided over the 66.16 acre site. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? June 18, 2001 Page 11 Potentially. The Trans ortation S stems ivision of the P/B/PW De artment have identified SE 124th Streety(NE 6� Street in Renton) as a future easUwest collector street in the future. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Not likelv. However, this non-project action. f. How many vehicular frips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. This is a legislative non-project action in which transportation impacts have not been identified since the actual levels of development are still unknown. However, if 225 new units were built, and assuming 10 AWDVTE there could be as many as 2,250 vehicles trip ends per 24 hour period (1,125 "in", 1,125 "ouY'). g. Proposed measures fo reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Not applicable at this non-proiect level. Level of future development is speculative at this point. 15. PUBL/C SERV/CES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Probabl . Increased residential densities that may occur with future development under the proposed zoning would increase the need for public services that typically serve residential development. Such services may include, but would not be limited to, fire protection, police protection, emergency services, and schools. b. Proposed measures to reduce or confrol direct impacts on public services, if any. The Citv of Renton currentiv collects mitiqation fees for some of these �services. Until a specific proposal is made at the project level it is too early to ascertain what these needs will be. 16. UTIL/T/ES a. Circle utilities currentl available at the sit ctricit natural gas water refuse service e ep one, anitary sewer, eptic s s em other. Unknown. Non-project action. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activit�es on the s�te or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Unknown. Non-project action. June 18, 2001 Page 12 C. S/GNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: �Ll��t��u/�L L�iv� Name Printed: �-��2cr� � �� Date: ��u�� June 18, 2001 Page 13 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets shou/d only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a fasfer rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How wou/d the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or re/ease of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? This is a leqislative non-proiect rezone action that is not anticipated by itself to change operations at the subject site or increase substance discharges into the environment. Subsequent development under the current County R- 4 zoning or the proposed City of Renton R-5 zoning are very similar. Any new development will likely increase discharges to air, water, etc. These, however, will be reviewed at the project level for SEPA compliance/mitigation. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: This non-proiect leqislative action. Subsequent development as a result of this proposed code amendment will have to go through environmental review uniess SEPA exempt. It is likely that air emissions, etc. would be addressed at this time when type and quantities of discharges are more likely to be known. Because Renton's R-5 Zone is comparable to King County's R-4 Zone in terms of density and housing type, impacts are expected to be comparable. 2. How wou/d the proposa/be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? No significant impacts to plants, animals,fish or marine life are anticipated to occur as a consequence of the proposed zoning action. The proposal would supplant existing County single-family zoning with Renton's single-family similar zoning. Therefore, impacts in this area are anticipated to be comparable under either zoning. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Not applicable. Mitigation would be prepared at the project level. 3. How would the proposal be likely to dep/ete energy or natural resources? This non-project legislative action will not directly impact energy or natural resources. Future project level development will, however, likely result in some additionai demand of such resources. However, because the density and type of development allowed under the Countys R-4 Zone and Renton's R-5 Zone are comparable, impacts would be about the same. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Not applicable since this is currently a non-proiect action. June 18, 2001 Page 14 4. How wou/d fhe proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligib/e or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitaf, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? This non-project rezone proposal will not directly impact environmentally sensitive areas. Two wetlands have been previously identified as being on the 66.16-acre site. There are also some steep slopes of 25% on portions of the site. It is anticipated that future development will plan around these areas. Under either County or City zoning these sensitive areas would have to be addressed. Proposed measures fo protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None qroposed at this time for this non-project action. 5. How would the proposa/ be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? This proposed non-project rezone will not directly affect land or shoreline use with new development. The proposed R-5 Zone, however, implements the Residential Rural land use designation mapped for this area on Renton's approved Comprehensive Plan which allows single-family housing at 5 du/net acre. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None proposed at this non-proiect level. As noted above any new development under the proposed IM zoning will have to be reviewed by the City's Hearing Examiner. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? This is a legislative non-project action that is not anticipated to significantly increase vehicle trips, the use of utilities, or other services significantly over what is allowed under current King County zoning. Proposed measures fo reduce or respond fo such demand(s) are: None proposed at this non-project level. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with /ocal, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protecfion of the environment. No conflicts with local, state or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment are known to exist with the subject non-project legislative proposal. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: �1.�'r�',�t�-G/'I�•r"��= Name Printed: / i�r"�if/r��l�'-rI Dafe: ��l�'i Dona►d Erickson - Re: Shamrock Annexation Page 1 � . ... .�'S�_ 1 . _ . _ ... ... . . . .... .. From: "Mark Holland" <pacificlancons@hotmail.com> To: <Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 7/23/01 2:15PM Subject: Re: Shamrock Annexation New email address for me is,mark.pacificland@verizon.net THANK YOU FROM: PACIFIC LAND CONSULTING MARK HOLLAND fax#425 696-0284 From: "Donald Erickson" <Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us> To: <Pacificlancons@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Shamrock Annexation Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 10:28:05-0700 Mark I just wanted to let you know that we have tentatively scheduled August 6th for the 10% Notice of Intent Public Meeting before the Renton City Council. You wili get a copy of the meeting notice once this date is confirmed. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. »>"Mark Holland" <Pacificlancons@hotmail.com> 06/04/01 10:08AM »> Thanks for the update............ -----Original Message ----- From: Donald Erickson Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:58 AM To: Pacificlancons@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Shamrock Annexation Mark,just a note to let you know that the Shamrock Annexation 10% Notice of Intent is circulating internally for two weeks. I'll also post the site this week. If you have questions please let me know. I believe I emailed you the schedule last week. »> "Mark Holland" <Pacificlancons@hotmail.com> 05/24/01 10:32AM »> We mailed the check to you along with the 10% Notice on May 18th, signed by all relevant parties, you should have received it to your office by now. What address did you send the certified letter to?We have not got it yet. If you don't get the check and the Notice by tomorrow, let me know and we will resend it........Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Donald Erickson Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 10:10 AM To: Pacificlancons@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Shamrock Annexation Mark,we mailed out a letter to you earlier in the week by certified mail returning your check for$30 and again requesting another check made out to the City of Renton for$24.82 for postage. We also included the original . . _ 9 Donal� rickson - Re: Shamrock Annexation Pa e 2� ;�.�. 10% Notice of Intent petition so that you can provide the relevant information that was requested on May 8th of this year. Until we have a complete application we will not be able to circulate it for internal review or schedule the 10% Notice of Intent public meeting before the Renton City Council. For reference you might want to review RCW 35A.14.120,Annexation by Code Cities - Direct Petition Method. We can go ahead and establish the date for the public hearing but at this point without a complete application we would have to recommend that the City reject your request. Piease let us know how you would like us to proceed. Thank you. P.S. If you don't receive the returned materials today, please let me know and we will have the Post Office do a trace. Thanks again, Mark. »> "Mark Holland" <Pacificlancons@hotmail.com>05/24/01 09:50AM »> Good morning, are we on the agenda for City Council yet? -----Original Message----- From: Donald Erickson Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 5:24 PM To: pacificlancons@hotmail.com Subject: Shamrock Annexation I hope Owen Dennison explained to you that I am the new project manager for this annexation. Because of his work on buildable lands and other annexations I was asked to take this one over for him. I am currently putting together a schedule which I will email to you as soon as I have finished it. In reviewing the file I see that your check was made out for$30.00 rather than the $24.82 amount needed. Since we cannot give change on checks we will need a new check for$24.82 from you. Upon receipt of a new check I will "void"your existing check and return it to you. Also in reviewing the file and checking ownership of the parcels listed I found some inconsistencies. The 10% Notice of Intent gives the impression that all parcels are held in common whereas the county records indicate that only some of the parcels are held in common ownership. It would assist us in processing this application if the following petition form is filled out. Since annexations do sometimes get appealed it is important that we cross the"t"s and dot the proverbial "i"s. If you have questions I can be reached at 425-430-6581. Thank you.Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.comGet more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.comGet more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ,� ' .�. ° , � CITY OF RENTON � Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Planning J e Tanner,Mayor Susan Carlson,Administrator July 12,2001 John Pavlik C/o Scott/Pavlik Household 12610 148"'Avenue SE Renton,WA 98059-4805 SUBJECT: SHAMROCK ANNEXATION AND REZONE Dear Mr. Pavlik: Thank you for your letter of June 27`�,which was received by our offices on July 7"', 2001. We appreciate you taking the time to express your views regarding this proposed annexation. I believe,however,that there are a couple of misconceptions in your letter that I thought were worth responding to,if you are interested. The first is the inference that densities would be higher in Renton than they would be in unincorporated King County. Actually,Renton's proposed R-5 Zone(5 du/net acre)is the same density as King County's R-4 Zone (4 du/gross ac)since Renton calculates density based upon "net"acreage and the County calculates it on"gross"density. Since net is what is left over after the removal of streets and major easements from gross acreage, it is generally assumed to be about 75%or 80°Io of gross. Ten gross acres under the County's R-4 Zone would typically allow 40 dwelling units. Assuming"net"at 80%(for streets and other easements)these same 10-acres under Renton's proposed R-5 Zone would allow 40 dwelling units as well(5 du/net ac X 8.0 net acres). The second inference was that property owners in the subject annexation site would pay higher taxes in Renton than they do now in King County. Actually,the taxes would be about the same. School mitigation fees collected in Renton are less than those collected in King County and will go to the Issaquah School District rather than the Renton School District. We appreciate your concern about environmental and quality of life issues. Renton is regulated by the same state environmental laws that govern all jurisdictions within the State of Washington. Developers are typically required to fill out environmental checklists and must note flora and fauna on the site as well as environmentally sensitive areas including wetlands, steep slopes, unstable soils, and the like. Mitigation measures are typically imposed by the City's Responsible Official for potential impacts,if any,not already addressed by the developer. The City is also very concerned about urban runoff and its impacts on downstream waterways and applies strict standards pertaining to stormwater retention and runoff for all new projects. Likewise,the City is very concerned about traffic impacts and is working with the County to find ways to address traff'ic on 128"'Avenue SE. Because this annexation and others in the area are within the King County Urban Growth Boundary, they are all designated for urban development at densities of at least 4 du/acre. This is true whether they are annexed into the City of Renton and developed here or remain in unincorporated King County and develop there. Because the � area in � " �'� r � 1 � 1 � 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 � .-�. '" �� . �This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer ��'' � { ! $ July 12, 2001 Page 2 question is located within Renton's Potential Annexation Area,the City of Renton is assumed to be the future provider of urban services for this area. I have added your household to our Parties of Record list and would be happy to discuss this annexation with you if you have further questions. I can be contacted at 425-430-6581. erely, � Oh,� Don Erickson,AICP Senior Planner cc: Rebecca Lind H:�ECON_DEV�EconomicDeve►opment�STRATPLIV�PLANNING�DEWnnexations�,Shamrock�Pavlik Letter.doc\cor , .�:, ,_ CITY OF RENTON �.t� Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Planning � 7esse Tanner,Mayor Susan Carlson,Administrator July 11, 2001 Kenneth E. Kiger 11826 142°a Avenue SE Renton,WA 98059 SUBJECT: SHAMROCK ANNEXATION AND REZONE Dear Mr. Kiger: Thank you for your recent note regarding the Shamrock Annexation and your concern about the possible creation of an island of King County surrounded by the City of Renton. Actually within the area you have indicated as becoming a potential island there are at least two other annexations currently under consideration. These are the Piele Annexation immediately to the west of Shamrock and south of SE 124�'Street(if extended)and the Johnson Annexation north of SE 124`i'Street(if extended)and west of 144�'Avenue SE(if extended). Because of the interest of property owners in obtaining urban services such as sewer, we believe that there is a reasonable chance of these two annexations being successful. Also, the respective property taxes, whether in the City of Renton or King County, are virtually the same. Please feel free to call me at 425-430-6581 if you have further questions about the Shamrock Annexation. If you have questions regarding the Piele Annexation or the Johnson Annexation you should contact Owen Dennison, who is handling these two annexations, at 425-430-6576. i , v � � Don Erickson,AICP Senior Planner cc: Rebecca Lind Owen Dennison ,�, � � � 1 .:3 ` � 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 `'/�� ;r.,: r, �� f :,;,.ti"�.. �Thic nanar cnntains fi0%rar.vr.InA matPrial.90%nost ronsume� �� Donald Erickson- Re: Shamrock Annexation � Page 1 { From: "Mark Holland" <pacificlancons@hotmail.com> To: <Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 7/9/01 3:46PM Subject: Re: Shamrock Annexation Thanks for the update. From: "Donald Erickson" <Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us> To: <Pacificlancons@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Shamrock Annexation Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 10:28:05-0700 Mark I just wanted to let you know that we have tentatively scheduled August 6th for the 10% Notice of Intent Public Meeting before the Renton City Council. You will get a copy of the meeting notice once this date is confirmed. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. »>"Mark Holland" <Pacificlancons@hotmail.com>06/04/01 10:08AM »> Thanks for the update............ -----Original Message----- From: Donald Erickson Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:58 AM To: Pacificlancons@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Shamrock Annexation Mark,just a note to let you know that the Shamrock Annexation 10% Notice of Intent is circulating internally for two weeks. I'll also post the site this week. If you have questions please let me know. I believe I emailed you the schedule last week. »> "Mark Holland" <Pacificlancons@hotmail.com> 05/24/01 10:32AM »> We mailed the check to you along with the 10% Notice on May 18th, signed by all relevant parties, you should have received it to your office by now. What address did you send the certified letter to?We have not got it yet. If you don't get the check and the Notice by tomorrow, let me know and we will resend it........Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Donald Erickson Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 10:10 AM To: Pacificlancons@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Shamrock Annexation Mark, we mailed out a letter to you earlier in the week by certified mail returning your check for$30 and again requesting another check made out to the City of Renton for$24.82 for postage. We also included the original 10% Notice of Intent petition so that you can provide the relevant information that was requested on May 8th of this year. Until we have a complete application we will not be able to circulate it for internal review or schedule the 10% Notice of Intent public meeting before the Renton City Council. For reference you might want to review RCW 35A.14.120, Annexation by Code Cities- Direct Petition Method. ----- — L Donald Erickson - LUA-01-084, A, R/Shamrock Annexation and Rezone Page 1 From: "r c" <rk childs@hotmail.com> To: <derickson @ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 8/15/01 10:34AM Subject: LUA-01-084, A, R/Shamrock Annexation and Rezone Donald Erickson - Part.000� Pa e 1 ------- -------- - - --- - - - ------- ---------------- 9 � . - I I am upset by this second attempt to annex and rezone in my area. The people that live here have �I made it perfectly clear that they do not want to become a part of the City of Renton. I was a ! recent opponent of the Anderson Annexation and that was a flop on the developers part, because I the people here so heavily oppose it. We like the fact that King County takes their time with permits. It helps to prevent too much I growth. We realize that we have to fight stronger to prevent growth,but at least with King ' County, we stand half a chance. Your City Officials told me point blank that I could not stop the I growth out here, that it was innevitable. I don't want people like that controlling my land. I am extremely disapointed with the level of distraction placed on your current notice. " To submit your objection by August 20 with a$75 application fee. " Yes,I am angry that you did �� not provide this e-mail address or the contact infarmation provided over the internet. Is it too i I much work for you?? The internet also says that the comments must be submitted by July 6, and ' ' the post sign says Aug 20. I I oppose it! I will walk door-to-door gathering signatures to oppose it if that is what you want. I, � Thank you Rita Childs j 12004 148th AVE SE '�, Renton WA, 98059 k Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at httQ//explorer.msn.com '; i t �i �I I i � �� - --__. _—_ _ _ - --- -- _1 Donaid Erickson - Re: LUA-01-084,A,R/Shamrock Annexation an Rezone �� Page 1 From: Charles Hurlocker<churlock@Qwest.net> To: Donald Erickson <Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 7/10/01 6:24PM Subject: Re: LUA-01-084,A,R/Shamrock Annexation and Rezone Charles Hurlocker 12217 148th Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059-4602 (425)235-8889 Thanks. Donald Erickson wrote: > Please forward your mailing address to me so that I can add you to our Parties of Record mailing list. Thanks. > > »> Charles Hurlocker<churlock@Qwest.net> 07/09/01 01:15PM »> > Mr. Erickson, > >Would you please put me on the mailing list of interested parties for > the subject project if such a thing exists?We live on one of the > properties in this project. Thanks. > > Charles Hurlocker >425-235-8889 � � CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: July 3, 2001 TO: Dan Clawson, President City Council Members VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Sue Carlson,Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson(430-6581) SUBJECT: Proposed Shamrock Annexation Notice of Intent ISSUE: The City is in receipt of a Notice of Intent to annex about 66 acres to the City of Renton by direct petition. (Attachment A-Vicinity Map) At the 10%Notice of Intent Public Meeting, the Council has the authority to accept,reject or geographically modify the proposal. RECOMMENDATION: • Authorize the circulation of the 60%Petition to Annex for the proposed area; • Require the adoption of City zoning on the property consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and • Require that property owners assume a proportional share of the City's bonded indebtedness. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: 1. Location: The proposed annexation is located approximately 600' north of NE 4"'Street and is generally bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, and on the east by 150th Avenue SE, if extended. It is bounded generally on the north by SE 1215`Street, also if extended. Its southern border is contiguous to boundaries of the City of Renton established by Ordinance#4760 in 1999. 2. Assessed Value: The assessed value of the properties proposed for annexation is approximately $6,671,500. Signatures representing approximately 19%of the total assessed valuation were included on the 10%Notice of Intent. .� Ju1X�,2001 Page 2 3. Natural Features: The site is gently sloping except for a 15'-20' rise in topography running on a north-southeast axis through the middle portion of the site. The western half of the site is relatively flat. 4. Existing Land Uses: The subject area includes 36 or 37 single-family homes. The remainder is vacant open space with the exception of a few agricultural related structures. 5. Existin�g: King County zoning for the subject properties is R-4, which allows four dwelling units per gross acre. 6. Comprehensive Plan: Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject properties as Residential Rural. Typical zoning would be R-5, five dwelling units per net acre. No City pre- zoning has been adopted for the subject area. 7. Public Services: All responding City departments and divisions indicated that service to the area would represent a logical extension of their respective functions and systems. Individual comments are summarized below: Parks: This area is noted for a tremendous lack of Park facilities. County parks transferred to the City as a result of annexations in the area will eventually result in the need for additional staffing and maintenance resources. Transportation: No comments received. Surface Water Utility: The proposed annexation area is within the drainage basin areas that are currently served by the City of Renton. There are no known drainage problems within this proposed annexation area. The area is within two drainage basins, Cedar and May Creek, that have been identified as having significant erosion,water quality, and habitat problems due to urbanization. Future development should be conditioned through SEPA to meet the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual until the City updates its current code far drainage standards to be equivalent. Wastewater Utility: The City's existing system is anticipated to be expanded into this area primarily through developer extensions and some City sponsored LIDs or SADs. Water Utility: Found issue of logical extension of services provided not applicable since the subject annexation site is located within Water District 90's water service area. They will be the provider. Police: No comments received. Fire: Fire commented that the proposed boundaries represented a logical extension of their setvices. Public Works Street Maintenance: Noted that although the proposed annexation would represent a logical extension of their services the existing street sections and drainage do not meet City of Renton standards. 8. Fiscal Analysis: A fiscal analysis will be provided to the Council with the 60%Petition to Annex. Shamrock Annexation 10%Issue Paper 07/06/O 1 2:12 PM . Jul,v� �, 2001 Page 3 ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION: (Pursuant to City Council Resolution 2429) 1. Consistencv with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject properties are located within the Urban Growth Boundary and are contiguous to the City limits (Policies LU-378-380 and LU-388.a.). Renton is the logical provider of urban infrastructure and services(Policy LU-383). 2. Consistency with the Boundarv Review Board Objectives: (from RCW 36.93.180) a. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities; Not applicable. b. Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, higlaways, and land contours; The annexation boundary abuts the current City of Renton boundary on its south and east edges. These edges are defined by existing parcel boundaries. The north and west edges also follow existing parcel lines. c. Creation and preservation of logical service areas; City staff has stated that the proposed annexation would represent a logical extension of City of Renton services to this area. d. Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries; The proposal would not create abnormally irregular boundaries. In fact the 66.6-acre site is almost a perfect rectangle, abutting Renton on two of its major sides; e. Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragernent of incorporations of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas; Not applicable. f. Dissolutiori of inactive special purpose districts; Not applicable. g. Adjustment of impractical boundaries; Neither the existing nor the proposed boundaries are particularly impractical. h. Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in character; and, King County has designated this area for urban development and zoned it at urban densities. Shamrock Annexation 10%Issue Paper 07/06/O 1 2:12 PM .-Jul��, 2001 Page 4 i. Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term productive agriculture and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority. Not applicable. CONCLUSION: City departments and divisions responding to the 10%Notice of Intent to Annex for the proposed 66.6- acre Shamrock Annexation raised no major issues that would preclude this proposal. The annexation and the proposed boundaries are generally consistent with the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use objectives and policies, as well as the objectives of the Boundary Review Board. A fiscal analysis will be conducted for the 60%Annexation Petition public hearing, if the Council accepts the Notice of Intent. Attachment cc: Rebecca Lind Shamrock Annexation 10%Issue Paper 07/06/O 1 2:12 PM . Y ti�Y o� City of Renton � �: ,z. DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, � � � NEIGHBORHOODS, and STRATEGIC PLANNING '� �� Sixth Floor �NT 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 www.ci.renton.wa.us Date: 07/10/01 TO: Alan Bauer FROM: Don Erickson Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning EDNSP Dept. Phone: ( ) Phone: (425) 430-6581 Fax Phone: (425) 413-9405 Fax Phone: (425) 430-7300 ISUBJECT; Shamrock Annexation I Number of pages including cover sheet 3 REMARKS: ❑ Original to ❑ Urgent ❑ Reply ❑ Please � For your be mailed ASAP Comment review Dear Mr.Baurer: Attached is a map showing the current boundaries of the Shamrock Annexation. I have also included the legal description for this annexation. Please call me if you have any questions about this application. We have tentatively scheduled August 6th,2001 for the 10%Notice of Intent to Annex Public Meeting before the Renton City Council. Thanks for your interest. 1'�Vl l l,Vt�. Ahead of the curve t- ,� . � Proposed Shamrock Annexation 117 h t > Q � 0 0 � � � S w > � � d- 124th p� � , � � � I � h PI � o e N h St h St z E 1 nd t 2n St � SE 13 Proposed annexation boundary ——— — Existing corporate boundary 0 600 1,200 G��Y o EDNSP � � + Sue Carlson,Administrator r�� O.Dennison �] t�NTO 20Apri12001 �. /��OO � , .� , SHAMROCK ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South half(1/2)of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter and the North half(1/2)of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the South half(1/2) of the North half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10, EXCEPT the North 132 feet thereof; AND the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, of Section 11,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,King County, ' Washington. � .�_.�_ Donald Erickson -�Re: Shamrock Annexation Page 2� We can go ahead and establish the date for the public hearing but at this point without a compiete application we would have to recommend that the City reject your request. Please let us know how you would like us to proceed. Thank you. P.S. If you don't receive the returned materials today, please let me know and we will have the Post Office do a trace. Thanks again, Mark. »>"Mark Holland" <Pacificlancons@hotmail.com> 05/24/01 09:50AM »> Good morning, are we on the agenda for City Council yet? -----Original Message----- From: Donald Erickson Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 5:24 PM To: pacificlancons@hotmail.com Subject: Shamrock Annexation I hope Owen Dennison explained to you that I am the new project manager for this annexation. Because of his work on buildable lands and other annexations I was asked to take this one over for him. I am currently putting together a schedule which I will email to you as soon as I have finished it. In reviewing the file I see that your check was made out for$30.00 rather than the$24.82 amount needed. Since we cannot give change on checks we will need a new check for$24.82 from you. Upon receipt of a new check I will "void"your existing check and return it to you. Also in reviewing the file and checking ownership of the parcels listed I found some inconsistencies. The 10% Notice of Intent gives the impression that all parcels are held in common whereas the county records indicate that only some of the parcels are held in common ownership. It would assist us in processing this application if the following petition form is filled out. Since annexations do sometimes get appealed it is important that we cross the"t"s and dot the proverbial "i"s. If you have questions I can be reached at 425-430-6581. Thank you.Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.comGet more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.comGet more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Donald Erickson - Shamrock Annexation Page 1 From: Donald Erickson To: Holland, Mark Date: 5/8/01 5:23PM Subject: Shamrock Annexation I hope Owen Dennison explained to you that I am the new project manager for this annexation. Because of his work on buildable lands and other annexations I was asked to take this one over for him. I am currently putting together a schedule which I will email to you as soon as I have finished it. In reviewing the file I see that your check was made out for$30.00 rather than the$24.82 amount needed. Since we cannot give change on checks we will need a new check for$24.82 from you. Upon receipt of a new check I will "void"your existing check and return it to you. Also in reviewing the file and checking ownership of the parcels listed i found some inconsistencies. The 10% Notice of Intent gives the impression that all parcels are held in common whereas the county records indicate that only some of the parcels are held in common ownership. It would assist us in processing this application if the following petition form is filled out. Since annexations do sometimes get appealed it is important that we cross the "Y's and dot the proverbial "i"s. If you have questions I can be reached at 425-430-6581. Thank you. : MetroScan / King (WA) Owner :Wegner Brett/.Mary K Parcel :102305 9021 Site :12211 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :04/O1/1994 Mail :12211 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price :$155, 000 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone :425-277-5195 Bedrm :3 Bath :1.75rotRm : YB 1982 Pool : B1dgSF:1,470 Ac : . 94 : MetroScan / King (WA) � �'Owner :Bashary Shay Parcel :102305 9026 Site :12239 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :05/17/1999 Mail :10025 SE 260Th St Kent Wa 98031 Price :$129, 950 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone . Bedrm :3 Bath :1. O�rotRm : YB1932 Pool : B1dgSF:1, 610 Ac : .92 : MetroScan / King (WA) Owner :Koch John E & Patricia D Parcel :102305 9038 ti.o �•� Site :12605 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :07/31/1984 Mail :12605 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price :$67, 000 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone . Bedrm :4 Bath :1. 00I'otRm : YB1936 Pool : B1dgSF: 1, 800 Ac : .29 f,�'`p� : MetroScan / King (WA) ner :Lai Man-Ling Parcel :102305 9069 ; Site :*No Site Address* Xfered :06/23/1999 Mail :12841 Lunada Pl San Diego Ca 92128 Price :$80, 000 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Phone . Bedrm : Bath : TotRm : YB Pool : B1dgSF: Ac :2 .98 `,� : MetroScan / King (WA) �wner :Hodge Harold D Parcel :102305 9170 �,r�•�Site :12261 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :11/Ol/1982 Mail :19210 1215t Pl SE Renton Wa 98058 Price :$50, 000 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone :253-854-0123 Bedrm :5 Bath :1.75I'otRm : YB1958 Pool : B1dgSF:2, 940 Ac : .46 : MetroScan / King (WA) Owner :Hunsaker James M Parcel :102305 9191 Site :12409 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :09/29/1999 ,,,��Mail :11335 Durland Pl NE Seattle Wa 98125 Price . Use :002 Res,single Family Residence Phone . Bedrm :1 Bath :1.00I'otRm : YB1957 Pool : B1dgSF:860 Ac :1. 05 : MetroScan / King (WA) �wner :Hunsaker James M Parcel :102305 9191 �� Site :12409 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :09/29/1999 Mail :11335 Durland P1 NE Seattle Wa 98125 Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone . Bedrm :3 Bath :1.00I'otRm : YB1926 Pool : B1dgSF:1,240 Ac :1.05 Information compiled from various sources.First American Real Estate Solutions,L.P.makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. � : MetroScan / King (WA) Own�r :Rawson Raymond L Parcel :102305 9341 S.�te :12609 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :11/03/1993 ��ail :12609 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price :$147,475 ��' Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone . Bedrm :3 Bath :2 .00rotRm : YB1993 Pool : B1dgSF:1,490 Ac : .25 : MetroScan / King (WA) Owner :Kelly Bryant K S/Nuiko K Parcel :102305 9355 �ite :12509 148Th Ave Se Xfered :05/24/2000 Mail :12601 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price :$187, 000 Full �y Use :008 Res,Mobile Home Phone . Bedrm : Bath : TotRm : YB Pool : B1dgSF: Ac : .28 : MetroScan / King (WA) ner :Martin Kenneth A Parcel :102305 9383 Site :12439 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :05/13/1986 Mail :12439 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone :425-235-6519 Bedrm :3 Bath :2 .50rotRm : YB1969 Pool : B1dgSF:2, 360 Ac :3 .69 : MetroScan / King (WA) ner :Jarvis Jerry D Parcel :112305 9010 Site :*No Site Address* Xfered . Mail :12204 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price . Use :300 Vacant,Residential Phone :425-271-0744 - Bedrm : Bath : TotRm : YB Pool : B1dgSF: Ac :3 .93 �% : MetroScan / King (wA) 'Owner :Scott Sharon Elizabeth Parcel :112305 9031 � Site :12610 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :04/19/1985 Mail :12610 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone . Bedrm :3 Bath :1.00rotRm : YB1957 Pool : B1dgSF:2,490 Ac :2 .36 : MetroScan / King (WA) S�wner :Nguyen Ngoc Parcel :112305 9067 Site :12232 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :05/15/1998 Mail :12232 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price :$130, 000 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone . Bedrm :3 Bath :1.00rotRm : YB1963 Pool : B1dgSF:1,350 Ac : .22 : MetroScan / King (WA) _ �wner :Metcalfe William Parcel :112305 9070 ite :12260 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered . Mail :12260 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone :425-226-6633 Bedrm :3 Bath :1.00rotRm : YB1963 Pool : B1dgSF:1, 050 Ac : .22 Information compiled from various sources.First American Real Estate Solutions,L.P.makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. : MetroScan / King (WA) Owner :Engh Dale;Robinson-Engh Mary E Parcel :112305 9075 Site :12250 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :02/28/2000 Mail :12250 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price :$171, 000 Full � Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone : � Bedrm :3 Bath :1. 00rotRm : YB1963 Pool : B1dgSF:1, 050 Ac : .22 : MetroScan / King (WA) � �Owner :Tomlinson Eric D & Autumn Parcel :112305 9078 �a% Site :12240 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :10/13/1988 Mail :12240 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone :425-228-0110 Bedrm :3 Bath :1.00I'otRm : YB1963 Pool : B1dgSF:990 Ac : .22 : MetroScan / King (WA) C�wner :Ellis Stanley E Parcel :112305 9091 , J Site :14900 SE 124Th St Renton 98059 Xfered . ��/ Mail :PO Box 2442 Renton Wa 98056 Price . Use :300 Vacant,Residential Phone . Bedrm : Bath : TotRm : YB Pool : B1dgSF: Ac :3 .75 f : MetroScan / King (WA) �' f Owner :Jarvis Jerry Parcel :112305 9092 �/ Site :12204 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered . Mail :12204 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone :425-271-0744 Bedrm :4 Bath :2 .25I'otRm : YB1975 Pool : B1dgSF:1, 700 Ac : .62 : MetroScan / King (WA) �Owner :Bowen Ralph P Jr/Brenda M Parcel :273920 0010 � Site :*No Site Address* � Xfered :05/07/1991 � Mail :12415 149Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price :$33, 550 Full Use :300 Vacant,Residential Phone . Bedrm : Bath : TotRm : YB Pool : B1dgSF: Ac : .21 : MetroScan / King (WA) �wner :Bowen Ralph P Jr/Brenda M Parcel :273920 0020 ite :*No Site Address* Xfered :05/07/1991 Mail :12415 149Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price :$33,550 Full Use :300 Vacant,Residential Phone . Bedrm : Bath : TotRm : YB Pool : B1dgSF: Ac : .21 : MetroScan / ICing (WA) Owner :Munro Richard G & Barbara C Parcel :273920 0030 I Site :*No Site Address* Xfered :11/26/1986 `'�"� �r Mail :12414 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price :$8, 000 ��.`�c � Use :300 Vacant,Residential Phone :425-271-0304 Bedrm : Bath : TotRm : YB Pool : B1dgSF: Ac : .21 Information compiledfrom various sources.First American Real Estate Solutions,L.P.makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of informatian contained in this report. ' : MetroScan / King (WA) Owner :Munro Richard G Parcel :273920 0040 Site :12414 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered . Ma`il :12414 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price . � `�Jse :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone :425-271-0304 � Bedrm :5 Bath :2.00TotRm : YB1960 Pool : B1dgSF:1, 540 Ac : .22 : MetroScan / King (WA) Owner :Flattum Patricia Lee Parcel :273920 0050 , � ite :12422 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :12/11/1992 Mail :12422 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone :425-228-3815 Bedrm :3 Bath :1.75rotRm : YB1961 Pool : B1dgSF:1, 860 Ac : .22 : MetroScan / King (WA) Owner :Larson James M/Gloria E Living Trust Parcel :273920 0060 Site :12430 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :12/06/1994 Mail :12430 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone :425-255-0713 Bedrm :3 Bath :1.00rotRm : YB1961 Pool : B1dgSF:990 Ac : .22 j'� : Me troScan / Ring (WA) � Owner :Hostas Vladimir Parcel :273920 0070 Site :*No Site Address* Xfered Mail :12438 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price . �4.�J, �� Use :000 *Unknown Use Code* Phone :42 - ^`� Bedrm : Bath : TotRm : YB Pool : B1dgSF: Ac : : MetroScan / King (WA) �Owner :Hohlbein Erik F/Michelle L Parcel :273920 0071 � Site :12438 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :03/14/2000 Mail :12438 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price :$212, 900 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone . Bedrm :4 Bath :1.75I'otRm : YB1963 Pool : B1dgSF:1, 940 Ac : .22 :� : MetroScan / King (WA) � Jwner :Bielka Ronald G Parcel :273920 0080 Site :12444 148Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :10/14/1993 f� Mail :18419 SE 122Nd St Issaquah Wa 98027 Price :$121,500 Full fj Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone :425-226-2226 i Bedrm :3 Bath :1.50PotRm : YB1959 Pool : B1dgSF:1,270 Ac : .22 i r' : MetroScan / FCing (WA) ! Owner :Bielka Ronald G Parcel :273920 0090 �: Site :*No Site Address* Xfered :10/14/1993 �;�� Mail :18419 SE 122Nd St Issaquah Wa 98027 Price :$121, 500 Full ��se :300 Vacant,Residential Phone :425-226-2226 Bedrm : Bath : TotRm : YB Pool : B1dgSF: Ac : .22 Information compiled from various sources.First American Real Estate So/utions,L.P.makes no representations or warranties as to ihe accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. : MetroScan / King (WA) Owner :Sikes Donald K Jr;Pack-Sikes Cindy L Parcel :273920 0100 Site, :12435 149Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :02/02/1999 Mae'i`1 :33010 SE 118Th St Issaquah Wa 98027 Price :$174,250 Full , ' ;�se :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone : edrm :3 Bath :2 .00rotRm : YB1967 Pool : B1dgSF:1,300 Ac : .22 v : MetroScan / King (WA) O�ner :Palzer Cathy Parcel :273920 0110 Site :*No Site Address* Xfered :08/05/1996 ��, Mail :36256 SE Fish Hatchery Rd Fall City Wa 98024 Price . Use :300 Vacant,Residential Phone :425-222-5045 Bedrm : Bath : TotRm : YB Pool : B1dgSF: Ac : .22 : MetroScan / King (WA) Own�r :Flattum Patricia Lee Parcel :273920 0120 �ite :*No Site Address* Xfered :12/11/1992 ��Mail :12422 148Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price . Use :300 Vacant,Residential Phone :425-228-3815 Bedrm : Bath : TotRm : YB Pool : B1dgSF: Ac : .22 : MetroScan / King (WA) Ow�er :Bowen Ralph P Jr Parcel :273920 0130 .,6�ite :12415 149Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered . t � Mail :12415 149Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone . Bedrm :2 Bath :1.00rotRm : YB1962 Pool : B1dgSF:1,980 Ac : .22 : MetroScan / King (WA) Ownex�:Kristoferson Richard M/Kristina E Parcel :273920 0140 �i'� �"""-^'�""� �te :*No Site Address* Xfered :07/22/1999 �� ''Mail :12406 149Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price . Use :300 Vacant,Residential Phone :425-271-1683 Bedrm : Bath : TotRm : YB Pool : B1dgSF: Ac : .21 : MetroScan / King (WA) Own�r :Kristoferson Richard M/Kristina E Parcel :273920 0150 r �ite :*No Site Address* Xfered :07/22/1999 `'Mall :12406 149Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price . Use :300 Vacant,Residential Phone :425-271-1683 Bedrm : Bath : TotRm : YB Pool : B1dgSF: Ac : .21 : MetroScan / King (WA) � Owner :Kingston Charles E/Stacy L Parcel :273920 0160 Site :12406 149Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :08/31/1999 Mail :12406 149Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price :$200, 000 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone . Bedrm :3 Bath :2 .00I'otRm : YB1963 Pool : B1dgSF:1, 910 Ac : .21 Information compiled from various sources.First American Real Estate Solutions,L.P.makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. � .. . ... Owen Dennison - Re: Annexation Petition Signatures Page 1 = From: "Mark Holland" <Pacificlancons@hotmail.com> To: "Owen Dennison" <Odennison@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 4/2/01 11:04AM Subject: Re: Annexation Petition Signatures I am having all owners re sign both my original letter and the new form you sent me. I will forward those to you along with the check....Thanks...Mark -----Original Message----- From: Owen Dennison Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 10:51 AM To: pacificlancons@hotmail.com Subject: Annexation Petition Signatures Mark, I checked the RCW section regarding the validity of petition signatures (attached). From my reading, the RCW does not appear to address power of attorney signature authority except as representing a corporate entity or for circumstances where a guardian has been appointed. It would be unfortunate to have the annexation appealed on a technicality. Please check this for yourself. Thanks. Owen ��:, �. � CITY OF RENTON ..LL Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Planning J e Tanner,Mayor Susan Carlson,Administrator May 22, 2001 Mark Holland Pacific Land Consulting,Inc. 13619 Mukilteo Speedway Lynwood,WA 98037 Dear Mr. Holland: SUBJECT: PROPOSED SHAMROCK ANNEXATION INTO CITY OF RENTON Since emailing you the 10%forms to annex on May 8th I have not received anything back from you and therefore cannot accept your application as complete or circulate it. As I noted in my email to you will need a new check made out to the City of Renton for$24.82 for postage along with the revised 10°Io Notice of Intent for Annexation to the City of Renton. The latter requires the parcel numbers representing the 10%ownership of the affected annexation area, along with the owners printed names, signatures,date signed and their mailing addresses. . I am returning your original check for$30.00 and the incomplete 10%Notice of Intent application so that this information can be provided. I have also included a tentative schedule for this annexation. It assumes that we will receive the 10%Notice of Intent for Annexation forms and a check made out to the City of Renton for $24.82 for postage on or before May 28�''2001. Obviously,if we miss this date everything else on the schedule slides. Summer vacations and holidays will also affect the schedule,as will other items ahead of you going to the City Council. I therefore urge you to get your completed . application in as soon as possible. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, J Oh..- Don Erickson,AICP Senior Planner/Project Manager Attachments: Original Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Timelines/Activities for Shamrock Annexation cc: Rebecca Lind Owen Dennison .��tl-'�� "� , �a, i°�, ,;,-"� ;1 ii.4 � � � � 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ��;, _��° �.�� , ��.i�:_ �!.. ��y. �This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer ��.' � SHAMROCK LANDSCAPING,LLC . � 45160 Mailing 30.00 �/13/O1 45160 City of Renton �30.00 . SHAMRQC#�_LANDSCAPdNG�LLC . ` KEY 8AN1�p�WASHINGTOM , �#S 7.E.0 : :124Q9.148TH f1V�-5E FEDER��WAX:WA FtEN7'01V,WA'98059-; . ts37/1z50 425-27.4-6568 �. Mern.o:� Stamps. . , . . ' , . OATE AMOUNT ,- 4 60 . pr 13; 2{?0.1. . ***��:�*�*�****��30.00 tt THirty and 0 J 100,Dollars � - i THE. ..; � IDER , City af Renton IO5S 3outh Grady Waq. Renton; WA-.98055 ��' � RUFHORtZED SIGNATURE � i�'0,45 �6Qu' +: i 25000574�: 47137 L00555 ?��' Fi SECURIFY FEATURES INCLUDED.OETAtLS ON BACK.B Mar- 19-01 04 : 45P p , O7 ��I�I� ��D ��SULTIlV� uv� 10% Notice of Inteat for Annezation iwto the (:i of Renton 3/1�1I01 At�1: OWen Uecuvson Gty of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,Wa 98055 Dear Owen Please ex�cpt Pac Hunsakcrs sigr.acurC ala�g with his pam�ezs as a noticc of Intenc to Auntx in w��ch thc}' ha�•e o��er !0°�b o�•�crship in the proposcd Anncxation area Included w�ct: cius In�ent is a map and legal descnpnon of the ad�ac�at parecls of Land we wisn to �nclode Plcase contact mc w�t}, an� fiir�her corresnondencr ur paper w�rk 1��,�c..�a.� ._ ...... "i��ri��c�� Thank yoU '�tark Hollwd Lcgal o��ncr3 of ptarccl �'s 102305 9319.9422,9q 15,9174,9031,9141znd 9384 Pat Htu>>ak�c. . " (�.^�.o�✓IMe""'�� C�t-�" � � > � %� yuc�-yt �c � �...� � 1/�— t ��(��.lC-Qit_— �S �� ` 1Pub9M 1.hco5pccd�•.y, Lrnnwo � 980)7 plwoc�(�:S) 1IS.µtS . d pac�(�danton ..mwicom � ��'_ _ ` '/' �� I�� ,�� o�� . Owner: Patricia Guthnliller Address: 12�O1 SE Z40`'' S`t. .i/01/200,1 ,lCent, Wa, 980.31 Reference:,�nnexatron into the City af,Renton ,�ear Patricia Paciftc Laricl Consutting is a land icse and research firnz that specializ�s in Snohomish, F�'ing Counry a�sd adjoinrng city's.One of my clients has purchased a large asse»ablage of land in King Coirnry adjaeent to you�s and is going to process an applicatio�t to annex their pr•operty and several orhers into the C'iry of Renton. The r•eason I am writingyou this letrer is to see if yoc�, as a property ox�ner in the preferred expansio�z area, would be�nterested in participating in this new annexation, As you cc�n see from the attached map, there is another annexation going on now called the Piele ann.exalivn and recently to your east sever•al large pareels of land have been already an�ze.Yecl i.nto tlte City. ,In doing so they have extended tlie sewet•and services down NE 4ch east wl7ich could be nf 6enefit to you and your neigl1bors at sonze time in the ficture. The purpose in askingyour participution is to not leave�yisland ofproperty that is not annexed. ,�would appreciar�the opportunity to discuss this with you at your earliest convienence. Th�s is strictly conf:dential and you of course have no obligation to agree to artn.ex. We at Pac f c Zand are very professional and understand how sensitive thzs issue can be. I would, howe�ler, appreciate yaur comntef�ts either way so I can evaluaie this for my client and the City. The way I would propose to do this is for you ta respond to this Letter by phone ar mail, letti�zg me know when you or a representative oJyours would be interested zn talkfng. ll�ly client is not as�ing for any k-ind of contribution or your rime. Their consultants would be the ones that would set up the procedcrres with King County and,Renton and do the initial paper tivork to get the potentia!Anrrexazion gaing. At the point we lzave re�zch the threshold needed for rhe City's criteria, then �he Ciry staff will do the r¢st. Again this ia a ver�� basic and simply procedure ta see if you are interested in partieipating in [his annexation. You earr reach me at the number below and if I am riot in the o�ce,please leati�e me your name and number and I wil[return the call. Thank you for your time and I hope we get the chance to rneet in person. S1�tcerely It�lark Holland Executive Consarltant 13619 Mul;ilteo Speedway�3521;ynnwood,WA 98037(425) 315-843� . . � ShamrockOwners PROPOSED SHAMROCK ANNEXATION King County Assessor's Records(01/01) Appraised Value Taxable Value PID TAXPAYERNAME Land Improved Total Land Improved Total 1023059069 LAI MAN-LING 100000 0 100000 100000 0 100000 1023059384s HOILAND JOHN D ET AL 95000 134000 229000 95000 134000 229000 �— 1023059383 MARTIN KENNETH A 110000 123000 233000 110000 123000 233000 1023059341 GILBERT KEITH C+CATHERINE C 60000 118000 178000 60000 118000 178000 2739200071 HOHLBEIN ERIK F+MICHELLE L 55000 97000 152000 55000 97000 152000 2739200220 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200060 LARSON JAMES M+GLORIA E 55000 70000 125000 55000 70000 125000 1023059038 KOCH JOHN E+PATRICIA D 60000 80000 140000 60000 80000 140000 2739200080 BIELKA RONALD G 55000 85000 140000 55000 85000 140000 1023059259 POWERS JACK M+DENISE T 60000 104000 164000 60000 104000 164000 2739200090 BIELKA RONALD G 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200210 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200110 PALZER CATHY 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200040 MUNRO RICHARD G 55000 95000 150000 55000 95000 150000 2739200240 REPENN ROGER 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200190 HALFHILL DAVID K&SUSAN L 55000 86000 141000 55000 86000 141000 1023059030 PALANCHUK GEORGIY+NATALYA 135000 58000 193000 135000 58000 193000 1023059174 o SMITH ROY 53200 125000 178200 47600 67100 114700 �` " 1023059174� SMITH ROY 41800 0 41800 41800 0 41800 �--�" 2739200250 REPENN ROGER 55000 25000 80000 55000 25000 80000 2739200180 REPENN ROGER L 55000 92000 147000 55000 92000 147000 1123059031 o SCOTT SHARON ELIZABETH 105000 98000 203000 105000 98000 203000 �.--- 1023059042 PHUNG AN T 155000 90000 245000 155000 90000 245000 1023059026 BASHARY SHAY 75000 20000 95000 75000 20000 95000 1023059319+� HURLOCKER CHARLES W+NORMA A 112000 45000 157000 112000 45000 157000 `=�" 1023059191 e HUNSAKER PAT 85000 75000 160000 85000 75000 160000 �-� 2739200050 FLATTUM PATRICIA LEE 55000 99000 154000 55000 99000 154000 1023059021 WEGNER BRETT+MARY K 75000 139000 214000 75000 139000 214000 1023059170 HODGE HAROLD D 65000 101000 166000 65000 101000 166000 1023059031 HUNSAKER PAT 110000 0 110000 110000 0 110000 1023059355 KELLY BRYANT K S 60000 56000 116000 60000 56000 116000 Page 1 � ShamrockOwners � PROPOSED SHAMROCK ANNEXATION King County Assessor's Records (01/01) Appraised Value Taxable Value PID TAXPAYERNAME Land Improved Total Land Improved Total 1023059415� HUNSAKER JIM & DENISE 150000 0 150000 150000 0 150000 �- � 1023059022• HUNSAKER JIM 146000 77000 223000 146000 77000 223000 �-- 2739200200 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 55000 88000 143000 55000 88000 143000 I 2739200100 SIKES DONALD K JR+CINDY I P 55000 88000 143000 55000 88000 143000 �'I 2739200230 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 1123059092 JARVIS JERRY 65000 117000 182000 65000 117000 182000 1123059067 NUGYEN NGOC 55000 86000 141000 55000 86000 141000 2739200120 FLATTUM PATRICIA LEE 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200030 MUNRO RICHARD G+BARBARA C 20000 0 20000 20000 0 20000 1123059070 METCALFE WILLIAM 55000 74000 129000 55000 74000 129000 2739200130 BOWEN RALPH P JR 55000 85000 140000 55000 85000 140000 2739200160 KINGSTON CHARLIE&STACY 55000 105000 160000 55000 105000 160000 1123059075 ENGH DALE+ENGH MARY E ROBINSON- 55000 74000 129000 55000 74000 129000 2739200260 RILEY JOHN 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200170 HAMMOND JAMES C+ERIKA L 55000 87000 142000 55000 87000 142000 2739200140 KRISTOFERSON RICHARD 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200150 KRISTOFERSON RICHARD 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200020 BOWEN JR RALPH P+BRENDA M 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200010 BOWEN JR RALPH P+BRENDA M 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 1123059091 ELLIS STANLEY E 110000 16000 126000 110000 16000 126000 1123059078 TOMLINSON ERIC D+AUTUMN 55000 72000 127000 55000 72000 127000 1123059010 JARVIS JERRY D 80000 28000 108000 80000 28000 108000 Page 2 Mar-19—01 04:45P P.07 L- RECEIV�p MAR 3 0 2001 ��j� ��D ECONOMIHBORHOODS,ENT, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING C��SULTIIy� ING 10°/a Notice of�nteAt �or Anneaation iwto th� C'�t;�af Rentnn 3l19/01 Atin;Owet�L?e�tuson City of Renton . IQSS Svuth Grady Way Rexltom,Wa 98055 Dear Owen Please�xcept Pat Hunsakers signatur�aloA�g with his pam�ess as a noticc of Intent to Aunc'�c izt wbich thcy ha�•e over lb% ownership in the pmposcd Atuarxation area. Includeci wi�h this Intenc xs a�cn�ap and legal descnprion of the adjacen�t parcels of Lazad we wish to include. Ptease eontact me witt�anv ftu'ther conrea�ondence v�paper wc,rk iic�caay:� �� :,.�,� u�,a Enu4caa. �aDk you !�Iazk Hotlatid I.cg.l oti++zr,era uEparc�l#'s 1023QS 9319,4422,9�115,9174,9031,9191u�d 9384 Pat Hunsak�c, 13h19 Mukiiceo Spccd�ny, Lrnnwood,w� 98037 plwnc r(125) 3►5-gs�5�r.m�;l-pse�f�eta�ncpne��mni�.eam �► �3 .�``� � . ' : MetroScan / King (WA) Owner :Hammond James C/Erika L Parcel :273920 0170 u�Y�^'�'��- Site :12414 149Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :O1/29/1999 ">j?-6ibi Mail. :12414 149Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price :$155, 000 Full U J :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone :425-430-1059 Bedrm :3 Bath :1.00TotRm : YB 1968 Pool : B1dgSF:1,330 Ac : .22 : MetroScan / King (WA) wner :Repenn Roger L Parcel :273920 0180 Site :12422 149Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered . Mail :12422 149Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone :425-228-5268 Bedrm :3 Bath :1.00TotRm : YB1968 Pool : B1dgSF:1,340 Ac : .22 �. ,�J � n : MetroScan / King (WA) Owner :Halfhill�d K/Susan L Parcel :273920 OI90 Site :12428 149Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :06/28/1993 Mail :12428 149Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price :$109, 000 Full Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone :425-271-6460 Bedrm :3 Bath :1.75I'otRm : YB1968 Pool : B1dgSF:1,320 Ac : .22 ,f' : MetroScan / King (WA) O ner :Sharkey Douglas V Parcel :273920 0200 Site :12436 149Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :12/O1/1988 Mail :12436 149Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price :$89, 745 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone . Bedrm :4 Bath :1.50I'otRm : YB1963 Pool : B1dgSF:2, 150 Ac : .22 : MetroScan / King (WA) Owner :Sharkey Douglas V Parcel :273920 0210 Site : *No Site Address* Xfered :12/Ol/1988 Mail : 12436 149Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price :$89, 745 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Phone . Bedrm : Bath : TotRm : YB Pool : B1dgSF: Ac : .22 : MetroScan / King (WA) Owner :Sharkey Douglas V Parcel :273920 0220 Site :*No Site Address* Xfered :12/Ol/1988 Mail :12436 149Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price :$89, 745 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Phone . Bedrm : Bath : TotRm : YB Pool : B1dgSF: Ac : .22 : MetroScan / King (WA) Owner :Sharkey Douglas V Parcel :273920 0230 Site :*No Site Address* Xfered :12/Ol/1988 Mail :12436 149Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price :$89,745 Use :300 Vacant,Residential Phone . Bedrm : Bath : TotRm : YB Pool : B1dgSF: Ac : .22 Information compilecl from various saurces.First American Real Estate Solutions,L.P.makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. a ' : MetroScan / King (WA) Owner :Repenn Roger Parcel :273920 0240 Site :*No Site Address* Xfered . Mail :12422 149Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price . Use :300 Vacant,Residential Phone :425-228-5268 Bedrm : Bath : TotRm : YB Pool : B1dgSF: Ac : .22 : MetroScan / King (WA) Owner :Repenn Roger L/Judye L Parcel :273920 0250 Site :12421 150Th Ave SE Renton 98059 Xfered :12/31/1992 Mail :12422 149Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price . Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Phone :425-228-5268 Bedrm :1 Bath :1.00rotRm : YB1985 Pool : B1dgSF:1,400 Ac : .22 ,r ��`r : MetroScan / King (WA) Owner :Riley John Parcel :273920 0260 Site :*No Site Address* Xfered . Mail :12414 149Th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Price . Use :300 Vacant,Residential Phone :425-271-1269 Bedrm : Bath : TotRm : YB Pool : B1dgSF: Ac : .22 Information compiled from various sources.First American Real Estate Solutions,L.P.makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information coniained in this report. �0% Notice of Intent for Annexation into the C�ty of Renton The�o3�owi�z�;g signatures represez�t I O%of the owners�up o�tln�e pzoposed Shamrock Annexation area_ ,T�r�,cluded with thxs Not�ice of Intent is a map and�ega�descniption of the pa�rcels of we would like to include in this annexatioz�. P�ted Name o�'�.ega� Qwne�r Si�n.a�tures �arcel:Plumbers ' Qwn�rs Patrick�unsakex 102305 9319 ,Acn1�Marie.Hunsaker,et aL - -- -; - --�____---_..,._._ � ___- _ __:.,.... L.rn�____ �� .w. _--- - --z. 1 Jim Hunsakec 142305 9022 D�nise Hwasakex,et al. �� .�,�;j:,,�f,�,C, _ ______. .....___ �wr��r, 1 T'im Hunsalsex 1.Q23Q5 941.5 DeniseHunsaker�_. __��.1�.�� -----------v�_.��,__.�., r�.,�'ix,�. Patric�cEnusalcer r' �02305 9174 . � Au�a ll'I.Hansaker .� __.-%�._ —_ v� A Jaanes M.Hunsaker 1 Q2305 9031 �.,..w._�__� ___.____ _. —�_ ____ _�___.n:_ r_,,_.. .:�_.�,._.___�_�—_� _ � Jawes M.Hunsaker '` 102345 91}1 Jo6un D.F�oilaztd X02305 9384 — ------ _��.n.,..- .._ __ ----- Ja�es��.Hubsaker,et al. Submitted on N�arch �9,200). . �� 1�'9 r��s � Donald Erickson - RE: Status on Shamrock 60% Petition Process Page 1 � From: "Mark Hoiland" <Mark.Pacificland@Verizon.net> To: "'Donald Erickson"' <Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 1/18/02 11:06AM Subject: RE: Status on Shamrock 60% Petition Process Don, at this point I have commitments for over the 60% required. should have all of the signature sheets by mid next week. I'll keep you posted..Mark - __. _,�.� -----Original Message----- From: Donald Erickson [mailto:Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 2:14 PM To: Mark.Pacificland@Verizon.net Subject: RE: Status on Shamrock 60% Petition Process We are working on a letter in response to the Burk letter read at the meeting. When it is complete I will forward a copy to you for reference. Other than that have not had a lot of contacts on this annexation. Usually, we don't hear a lot until the 60% Petition stage. Take care, Don Erickson. »> "Mark Holland" <Mark.PacificlandC�Verizon.net> 12/03/01 10:30AM »> I got the sign in sheet. Any other personal contact information you may have had on Shamrock would be helpful........Thanks............Mark -----Original Message----- From: Donald Erickson [mailto:Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:06 AM To: Mark.Pacificland@Verizon.net Subject: RE: Status on Shamrock 60% Petition Process Mark, I don't think signing the petition should in anyway affect their plat. The people who review the signatures at King County are not the ones who review plats. I asked Shawna Mulhall to send you a copy of the meeting sign in sheet a couple of weeks ago. I've asked her again and she said she sent it to you last week. Hope this helps. Let me know if there is anything else I can do. »> "Mark Holland" <Mark.Pacificland@Verizon.net> 11/27/01 04:OOPM »> Donald I talked with Mike Ramano who is processing the platt for Dreamcraft Homes, within the Shamrock annexation area and he said it was going to be a conflict for them to sign the petition now. They are processing through King Co. Do you concur? Also I sent you an earlier email requesting the list of the people that attended the meeting. Can you mail or fax that to 425 696-0284.Thanks.........Mark -----Originai Message----- From: Donald Erickson [mailto:Derickson@ci.renton.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:49 PM To: mark.pacificland@verizon.net Subject: Status on Shamrock 60%�Petition Process Hi Mark. In order for us to ensure that we will have sufficient processing time for this annexation I will need to know when you estimate you will be ready to submit the 60% petition form. Hope you ' � W . --.� �i��.� u.K� i o 2 3� °�-�ad �` *�� oZ�� i 1�t1.V�UC1��i/ Y,c�r ��v� S✓ t o22� �3t� �� d2365�o�z � oZl �� .t�s o ��+�-�c� S�v�n� _ 1 t� tD�.-305 �%tDZZ. � - L ��1�� `�°� l + {t 23� Go(�`7 � . ��,°" � - 1 �a 1�r � r�� '��enti� . � � s � � ��2� ao�� , �-�.�n Scc.�� rn��✓ �lo � � L p�`� j t oZ 3[�v G,ti i� ta2�5 a��`� !�22#� .�(E��.-��zacY �t�► � �' 1 _.. � 'a-roc� � � taz2�5a�� Mc�� ao�� 1/•._� t N � � � ��n�� t�23a 1 bZaD� Yc. v �-C ii 1-C ��h b�5 � Z 10�..� �h l.l.. � � v.,inSG�� rf�23��,1Z� `I�B� 1� iao �tl�'D �i23 j� �� 2 � '�u��t 1�25d� ,� �` v -� �� L�3 ��. �oz.�o�� Z- t-o2� ac��l ,�- 1�� 2 3 � v Cp ►ti�,,-ti�,w� , �j t�.t X < ,�.�,., �� Z a� � � �l l 0 t o�305�.1�✓ hY�1� oi�, �oZ��``�' ►0 2� '°�`,� � 1 ( 1 Z )�u )�-{ ao� �1ti�Z , �3p�p b�aJ� ioz �Gt� �FGV _ . \ ��' � VC t t � � � . a � i�z�o5 foZ3o` ` L�o..��n I�� 1�� cs,�C� �o�,�e �� o-za o�►o�g Z �o�os �oz5 �` �-�1c�.�Y1 ,o z�s s �� v 2, Z Ko2 3aS �-��- qz�.� � ,��s 3 J �033 to22� Gc�-`� .�Dz S �t3�3 �as - �aZS3�' �, �t2��6'-� �( � �� 2"�_. _��{ 2 S 2-�-P �D ►oy3os ��. �o s �/' �,"` �o Scflt�-✓ ►vs ► � �,�� t c zavs aoa< <3: 1023 1�. �iG�� l�✓, � �v22� �b. `��D�J" i� a< Ch�i5� ; `' � �ez�ai t� ; 3 J c�In v�� 1 �oz3o��t�? � -vu�.�d�1 I G 1Y (u2�Z�c� � } � l � I � r ;. PIAN HOLO COWURAT10N . • IRME. CAUFDRNIA PLAN HOLD CDFNKMTCN • RME, CALI DFV" LEER BY NUk*93107W RB7iUBi BY NUMSM 07W y -,-y..- t _. ��_.. _�.' : r ., a�:.�__.�_1 _.. �YIYr r�[7�LWW[1r1O/1�[-. t :: , a_i- y_ _ s -...._ _. ._ _ __ __ -Y-'-._. _ _ .. _.... .. .__------•---.-_ f i 1'3 MAP iA F" Im PLTRPOBS OP KING COUNTY ASSESSOR P"PUM�><sTxNU � ��s° YM ,ro � Jy�' av �'E>,n 7 3 MLAS=MENTS NW. 11-23-5 o c,ro. oo� ° 1 1309.71 - - 294 7 K.C. 41 �uNs 1g19�. \ _ i > _ 450 '- 2a I s o� © I" _ C. Ne7- &I -c-1 w - yes1`1. os Nal L7. 23 W ° N. 21' 23 W.- 3 _ SCALA I I i 0 1 so.l , oo. �t _ .4Z I ♦• Co 53. I io ss6. 00 s. e, -aw z�• c. Zlo.le - , so.�z "'s' - 1309,71 v 0 5j1 . . v) 10 0 , 6r s.e�•z�'zs.� ,sro.,� `•Po.oz is+/r (,ter. ..ic �PdJ '2 '77T` sE.12orH.57. • N 1%+ N �' 111 *n - 0 ® 20 of ►.1. a7• z� as W. h d � •� t1 p �, a /.�.�../ 150.1E \ O` N a h '11 A0 .3? I'I N N . A� \ 01 �i o o p / Ohl "' DI 5 ti ° op 0 c, 3 00 1 1 o o, I �o / 32 3 ®01. N W 3 � e�-st-�.r- v-- --- n r Al , Nr 3 1 1� /3-f.oO7 N.B7 --- -- Nd7-Sf-2•fciY n J /3 *S c�7 /.3.4, 07in /.��• 07 r----- - � y ,u � rr � N 0� o .3 / p% 0 2 � � fl � - ��, 0 DML 2 0 o ° I N Np r -79-7s W I ��' / °1,�0 101 \0 0 ��° 0 a h G1 '� n 0 i7f. a s� 1 -- - - oto Nn"V W ^^ w J D 120 til' �[0 �3O j Q I5� I til a 19�e \°�,P�. I0` q P �pV. ��' IDI<095o°j1 Io112 • p� 03 9S 180.1 _ 150.12_ - �S4.PP N.Y7•b3'14 w. �V ` \ 130, 1z a.e7.3a' IL•' E• �`(, O to..1 \ d \ //d•f.S6 -' - 174.!07 -h + 101 0 29 � � \1 ` � •I'� � 29 ` '\1 10) L'o 1011Z W ' -w -- I' os,,o _V) _ 1 leo o i ut , LIQ d � � _ 1ti1' w �>' �� > 1°\2rP B : 'o> I s 10.11`?��0; 101Z 280 Q o : s 011 Lid , ' _ _ - - - •-�- -- - - � °� � � � 0350 W 011 z 6 �`� �D - Q\\,,o - N 1011,�°�lb° 10X12 Z7 14 5-,o I , .. .• o rl o Zed • \ � d _ y._ • I o 1 Zc 2.. 150 ��. o 1 �, ° Z(z6 * �� I 1�''� to "4;Ip11Z�° 2s , ^1�0 ON ° '�' l°170 267.16 .vs7 gorr� 3t7 - _ , 'I '� �� 'V^ h: _ .o Y�,..r sw�- .wlv- rw. 1 V \�10 a N B oo " to l t. 4r 9` cD o q�Q °� '550 cQ Ol I co 26796 92 \ G1�Z� 2¢ ' t t 2t,1� �� ¢ t co O , JJ / ] 1z z (0 4) v 0 1D11o10 . 1p1 ca M 9 101 39� ; I I °5 0 10 7 v N Pc I. A IN 5\01011 00 .vee -s --rgw km P V75040 - ' . 011 22 S �- o J p � 28o5�s AL - J ,,A� I°I' �° 10 Z z2 r/ D o q1D� loo KC�503 9 O y O 101.OA ° Io 1 s,o 0 Vol. lot 1 14 ^� � y , vZ° - -\v 0151-1? CA -50 Fc. I • f3 n+ r` +� N I a V r m �, s 1 Z� P = � '10 0 loo 1X01 \\ o = � /-A� 1011�Lo � 1p� /9 I - 0170 17 .1---- - °b oA'1° �o D 611 1 d L�-Li c� w a 01��D w1� 3•�s��, 0180 18 � I lo, L rB � � � , ,� oI,�Z�. h J°11 � .. � /s U-) 6 91 l o o ro 1 ° 0 i., in /00 04 in 1 oq� / o M 525.15 t , y _ „ N � ro _ �z�.IZ 7J0J070244--ro' ^ I ''5 10. l9 1017 v d 8 ! e ��,49Z.. aaz.as -�� 1310.4 �ss.12 0190 19 © $ �o-,o 17 $ °� /� io, v 101 i�Qo S S. E. 12 4TH ST. - - - - - - - I,>� ,,-,o /7 r6 1o1 -t � co s 4. o a /3-s. 0 7 O m ., 6O W /34. oddT 0 M 0 90.0 Y T 90.0 Do.o110.01 - - - /34.0 V` 1310.24 /�-F.O7 �j 9 0 . o NE 6TH STREET 21c. s/ h ' S E. • 12 .1,T H. 3 T . E.ori ix+/`c Pa. J ► N (n Z 3 2 m I G ' CD 3 F he142 I ems. si /G . o h ✓ e i--� . - cre.' a mac. si 1 0 � D 0 N N o cp N 1?(� N -- Dj� �� Dl 9ti 0 0 0 p o 6 p o 01\°1 kp o 577 578 / �. a 1.2-'i o r /a s o7 I ! R -y - _.._ o d M ' 3.1r� _%��. aisi.�ci0 o W 0\b Jam• o� 5 0I 16 .r 3 c X+I! / W G o I CP do' 0200 20 0160 1� 13�A �o v 1�1 41 99 J 30 .'� .. N ro o1 +o. o BT. Oro 90.0 90.0 07. 111 N (� 1 0 / C ,as.�3 I��.64 �� W N °1 a tiq 0 0 p� 0 p 571 N 68 zi 2 j is-. c0'o 0300 . g 11 �\o rl 572 _ /y ae-r '+ ,Yee- z/- /-3.4 o r� p� /3 4. o I /3 �. o * , r 4 9111' Co,p9�\�p 13 u ��4 9L9+�� 13 0210 21 15 0150 --- -- ---- /.�.�o.. J�2 9 2 ti� ° q� �°1i7 t 0 qQ q4 ; 565 5661 1001)10 w $ 11°� o 10,123 29 % N' % 5 9�ti ° 9 v 12 2 5 9 LOP o 9u 12 b o220 22 14 0140 - - `^ M oe0 J ° 1„ ooZ° D 1 3.74 I 133.7400 • I Q I 1':! 3.74 �I� 559 S 7 2B • '��O 1J 0 N h 1� 30� P �3° 1 W �0� 1030 : Q 0230 23 13 0130 lol,)oo 3 - ' 1011 oil 2e ; P ` ,3 123 t 6 10 0 q II 6 I I W� D 50 I N Ov a 0 9 9i'o\qo o2°co 553 , z 554 a - - " �� °Z� - - _ / oo� 1 sQ �� 1 J'�.75 1 sa.7s 133. 7s 24 > 12 0120 "y,� -. tj 0 I MAA 2� `�) f% t ' {� z -7 • 3 to 7 �jL�° ; ��'� to o 0 1526 1�1�,0 ¢(� JO,IZ 101123 27 V .¢ o�� I a� 525 �-___. _ _ 33-?OLr) �0 Z5 fJ� 11 0110 � --- -�. 4 0 g n N 6 p° N `'l°o g 519 a 520 1 JDI � Z6 p S ivl,,1� to �z3 Z6 t S 2l �, �. og• 07'00 w G2s.09 0260 26 10 0100 Z� M o� G )0.01 �o.e1 133.76 1 3 D. 7� 3Qol _ _ _ _ • o, t" o 513 514 0270 -- 2' 9 0090 1 3 2� ,�i' Zs ' . 101 J 0 CD d.�10 - o ,to c,�� oe>° m 6 507 508 - - - � - V) _ �' 10 0280 28 8 0080 Z3 �24 7 n a 3j A� ` o w p ry 1 Z :� 23 �2,¢ t tin , 7 �3 d : N 2 502 0, 0 1 o`b`i 1°' b 5 0 1°'1 M 1' i° 11 p l -- G Z 5. 14 501 \ - - - - " O .. OZ`O . 7 I,v F �'1 u. 297. S711.3 84 - - 7 0070 \ - N 0 z 97 CIO - 16. 5.6 4 0290 N , Dj n �1 Q 1 NE STH STREET 1 23 o Ip,1 L3 0 lo 2� 23 1 h 1011 Z' OD 6 0060 �S 11 I' 1 O a' ° N O ii HZ'S° -P _ 17) l�•".0 e I a a 1 5 0050 Io �� 22o ' P $ all 9 p ��,3 � 713 22 ' 4) 101 • 9 Z3 fl = M /01� 90 cD 11� h 4 0040 h N m 462 01� y32/ e i ;�� + /O Z3 : 101 ry \ ry D 3 0030 t �J ° ZI o �, I 1 100 ry +yy 55089 � 6 � 456 I h d � 1iIzs.o 3 9 2 0020 I O IDI / 20 nW 2O n �/ 01��3 1Z�j" LLJ (*,A D ® 23 1 p6� �� --v 1 011101 0200 1010,,0 --_ --------------- 450 * > �� ] o - 1 0, 0010 10 m 1011 1011 i9 • _ \ /� Ip � � • , NE 4TH PLACE o4� �-- - d'�A 0 0190 41- I 1 Z0 cD � m M x 1011) 1 TRACT C 300 ° X54 1 01to i 1 a 130 I 1 a � '��✓�/�7 ° I� 0 /.� �.•3 0 ti3 � 0 h v 917 WINDWOOD DIVISION 1 1 D 1 \ ) D 11 1011 / 7 �. $ /4 1 D ►1 p 5 Z �.� A o LND-10-0345 EUA -99 -094 -FP KC REC #19991 199 I �, ��o � o ti n bA�. JAS, a5, r1 1° MMOR#947792 �.°�' �Ib olio - P 9 Nti1 '��, ►�'. lo,°l' �0,9•'� n nv 019 /e6.90 /fd.7u 125,0 -_�.- ----- _. _ o / '1� /G :y 30" r 6 ,5 (Co.r s9z,/� /6 t97d - - - _ _ t---- --- -�:`� -�-""' fli��._._ _�• _-QQ,�//�� _�sv. i s --- - - -- -- - - - °'1 I� • P of �c v cz 1. - iy gG//� il.`// .- _ /.�'i•OT /�4.0¢ T 39 ¢• .• r, RD. -T E sT 1819) --1311.17 S E. 128 r1-1 ST. r 4 � _ ... ...1..?� �jyAr- .. 4Lr /.z 94 - . "/• s� z-... 9.5871696 1 �i �O RC. - 8 i I ~' �. 4 L 5 7 I b- y t S E. 1 -. N ;. 70. o/ /`.c 1v, 2 3 28TH 5T. a ,, ��,-, .,, .3,4�� - /Yo% . ✓ Tr►rr. �h s rrr' 4 W 1 6 - 1 ` ,7- r� .. a = • ,� 1 I I. - •'/i •' 7 .a O/3-/ 3� d. ;/ 7,1 -r /6•,+. o, Al 636.2/ NW. .4 21i 5 VIfVG CO. AERIAL. 5URVE`5• o' Lar E/ F -R-, ,1 /f 1 PIAN HOLO COWURAT10N . • IRME. CAUFDRNIA PLAN HOLD CDFNKMTCN • RME, CALI DFV" LEER BY NUk*93107W RB7iUBi BY NUMSM 07W y -,-y..- t _. ��_.. _�.' : r ., a�:.�__.�_1 _.. �YIYr r�[7�LWW[1r1O/1�[-. t :: , a_i- y_ _ s -...._ _. ._ _ __ __ -Y-'-._. _ _ .. _.... .. .__------•---.-_ f i 1'3 MAP iA F" Im PLTRPOBS OP KING COUNTY ASSESSOR P"PUM�><sTxNU � ��s° YM ,ro � Jy�' av �'E>,n 7 3 MLAS=MENTS NW. 11-23-5 o c,ro. oo� ° 1 1309.71 - - 294 7 K.C. 41 �uNs 1g19�. \ _ i > _ 450 '- 2a I s o� © I" _ C. Ne7- &I -c-1 w - yes1`1. os Nal L7. 23 W ° N. 21' 23 W.- 3 _ SCALA I I i 0 1 so.l , oo. �t _ .4Z I ♦• Co 53. I io ss6. 00 s. e, -aw z�• c. Zlo.le - , so.�z "'s' - 1309,71 v 0 5j1 . . v) 10 0 , 6r s.e�•z�'zs.� ,sro.,� `•Po.oz is+/r (,ter. ..ic �PdJ '2 '77T` sE.12orH.57. • N 1%+ N �' 111 *n - 0 ® 20 of ►.1. a7• z� as W. h d � •� t1 p �, a /.�.�../ 150.1E \ O` N a h '11 A0 .3? I'I N N . A� \ 01 �i o o p / Ohl "' DI 5 ti ° op 0 c, 3 00 1 1 o o, I �o / 32 3 ®01. N W 3 � e�-st-�.r- v-- --- n r Al , Nr 3 1 1� /3-f.oO7 N.B7 --- -- Nd7-Sf-2•fciY n J /3 *S c�7 /.3.4, 07in /.��• 07 r----- - � y ,u � rr � N 0� o .3 / p% 0 2 � � fl � - ��, 0 DML 2 0 o ° I N Np r -79-7s W I ��' / °1,�0 101 \0 0 ��° 0 a h G1 '� n 0 i7f. a s� 1 -- - - oto Nn"V W ^^ w J D 120 til' �[0 �3O j Q I5� I til a 19�e \°�,P�. I0` q P �pV. ��' IDI<095o°j1 Io112 • p� 03 9S 180.1 _ 150.12_ - �S4.PP N.Y7•b3'14 w. �V ` \ 130, 1z a.e7.3a' IL•' E• �`(, O to..1 \ d \ //d•f.S6 -' - 174.!07 -h + 101 0 29 � � \1 ` � •I'� � 29 ` '\1 10) L'o 1011Z W ' -w -- I' os,,o _V) _ 1 leo o i ut , LIQ d � � _ 1ti1' w �>' �� > 1°\2rP B : 'o> I s 10.11`?��0; 101Z 280 Q o : s 011 Lid , ' _ _ - - - •-�- -- - - � °� � � � 0350 W 011 z 6 �`� �D - Q\\,,o - N 1011,�°�lb° 10X12 Z7 14 5-,o I , .. .• o rl o Zed • \ � d _ y._ • I o 1 Zc 2.. 150 ��. o 1 �, ° Z(z6 * �� I 1�''� to "4;Ip11Z�° 2s , ^1�0 ON ° '�' l°170 267.16 .vs7 gorr� 3t7 - _ , 'I '� �� 'V^ h: _ .o Y�,..r sw�- .wlv- rw. 1 V \�10 a N B oo " to l t. 4r 9` cD o q�Q °� '550 cQ Ol I co 26796 92 \ G1�Z� 2¢ ' t t 2t,1� �� ¢ t co O , JJ / ] 1z z (0 4) v 0 1D11o10 . 1p1 ca M 9 101 39� ; I I °5 0 10 7 v N Pc I. A IN 5\01011 00 .vee -s --rgw km P V75040 - ' . 011 22 S �- o J p � 28o5�s AL - J ,,A� I°I' �° 10 Z z2 r/ D o q1D� loo KC�503 9 O y O 101.OA ° Io 1 s,o 0 Vol. lot 1 14 ^� � y , vZ° - -\v 0151-1? CA -50 Fc. I • f3 n+ r` +� N I a V r m �, s 1 Z� P = � '10 0 loo 1X01 \\ o = � /-A� 1011�Lo � 1p� /9 I - 0170 17 .1---- - °b oA'1° �o D 611 1 d L�-Li c� w a 01��D w1� 3•�s��, 0180 18 � I lo, L rB � � � , ,� oI,�Z�. h J°11 � .. � /s U-) 6 91 l o o ro 1 ° 0 i., in /00 04 in 1 oq� / o M 525.15 t , y _ „ N � ro _ �z�.IZ 7J0J070244--ro' ^ I ''5 10. l9 1017 v d 8 ! e ��,49Z.. aaz.as -�� 1310.4 �ss.12 0190 19 © $ �o-,o 17 $ °� /� io, v 101 i�Qo S S. E. 12 4TH ST. - - - - - - - I,>� ,,-,o /7 r6 1o1 -t � co s 4. o a /3-s. 0 7 O m ., 6O W /34. oddT 0 M 0 90.0 Y T 90.0 Do.o110.01 - - - /34.0 V` 1310.24 /�-F.O7 �j 9 0 . o NE 6TH STREET 21c. s/ h ' S E. • 12 .1,T H. 3 T . E.ori ix+/`c Pa. J ► N (n Z 3 2 m I G ' CD 3 F he142 I ems. si /G . o h ✓ e i--� . - cre.' a mac. si 1 0 � D 0 N N o cp N 1?(� N -- Dj� �� Dl 9ti 0 0 0 p o 6 p o 01\°1 kp o 577 578 / �. a 1.2-'i o r /a s o7 I ! R -y - _.._ o d M ' 3.1r� _%��. aisi.�ci0 o W 0\b Jam• o� 5 0I 16 .r 3 c X+I! / W G o I CP do' 0200 20 0160 1� 13�A �o v 1�1 41 99 J 30 .'� .. N ro o1 +o. o BT. Oro 90.0 90.0 07. 111 N (� 1 0 / C ,as.�3 I��.64 �� W N °1 a tiq 0 0 p� 0 p 571 N 68 zi 2 j is-. c0'o 0300 . g 11 �\o rl 572 _ /y ae-r '+ ,Yee- z/- /-3.4 o r� p� /3 4. o I /3 �. o * , r 4 9111' Co,p9�\�p 13 u ��4 9L9+�� 13 0210 21 15 0150 --- -- ---- /.�.�o.. J�2 9 2 ti� ° q� �°1i7 t 0 qQ q4 ; 565 5661 1001)10 w $ 11°� o 10,123 29 % N' % 5 9�ti ° 9 v 12 2 5 9 LOP o 9u 12 b o220 22 14 0140 - - `^ M oe0 J ° 1„ ooZ° D 1 3.74 I 133.7400 • I Q I 1':! 3.74 �I� 559 S 7 2B • '��O 1J 0 N h 1� 30� P �3° 1 W �0� 1030 : Q 0230 23 13 0130 lol,)oo 3 - ' 1011 oil 2e ; P ` ,3 123 t 6 10 0 q II 6 I I W� D 50 I N Ov a 0 9 9i'o\qo o2°co 553 , z 554 a - - " �� °Z� - - _ / oo� 1 sQ �� 1 J'�.75 1 sa.7s 133. 7s 24 > 12 0120 "y,� -. tj 0 I MAA 2� `�) f% t ' {� z -7 • 3 to 7 �jL�° ; ��'� to o 0 1526 1�1�,0 ¢(� JO,IZ 101123 27 V .¢ o�� I a� 525 �-___. _ _ 33-?OLr) �0 Z5 fJ� 11 0110 � --- -�. 4 0 g n N 6 p° N `'l°o g 519 a 520 1 JDI � Z6 p S ivl,,1� to �z3 Z6 t S 2l �, �. og• 07'00 w G2s.09 0260 26 10 0100 Z� M o� G )0.01 �o.e1 133.76 1 3 D. 7� 3Qol _ _ _ _ • o, t" o 513 514 0270 -- 2' 9 0090 1 3 2� ,�i' Zs ' . 101 J 0 CD d.�10 - o ,to c,�� oe>° m 6 507 508 - - - � - V) _ �' 10 0280 28 8 0080 Z3 �24 7 n a 3j A� ` o w p ry 1 Z :� 23 �2,¢ t tin , 7 �3 d : N 2 502 0, 0 1 o`b`i 1°' b 5 0 1°'1 M 1' i° 11 p l -- G Z 5. 14 501 \ - - - - " O .. OZ`O . 7 I,v F �'1 u. 297. S711.3 84 - - 7 0070 \ - N 0 z 97 CIO - 16. 5.6 4 0290 N , Dj n �1 Q 1 NE STH STREET 1 23 o Ip,1 L3 0 lo 2� 23 1 h 1011 Z' OD 6 0060 �S 11 I' 1 O a' ° N O ii HZ'S° -P _ 17) l�•".0 e I a a 1 5 0050 Io �� 22o ' P $ all 9 p ��,3 � 713 22 ' 4) 101 • 9 Z3 fl = M /01� 90 cD 11� h 4 0040 h N m 462 01� y32/ e i ;�� + /O Z3 : 101 ry \ ry D 3 0030 t �J ° ZI o �, I 1 100 ry +yy 55089 � 6 � 456 I h d � 1iIzs.o 3 9 2 0020 I O IDI / 20 nW 2O n �/ 01��3 1Z�j" LLJ (*,A D ® 23 1 p6� �� --v 1 011101 0200 1010,,0 --_ --------------- 450 * > �� ] o - 1 0, 0010 10 m 1011 1011 i9 • _ \ /� Ip � � • , NE 4TH PLACE o4� �-- - d'�A 0 0190 41- I 1 Z0 cD � m M x 1011) 1 TRACT C 300 ° X54 1 01to i 1 a 130 I 1 a � '��✓�/�7 ° I� 0 /.� �.•3 0 ti3 � 0 h v 917 WINDWOOD DIVISION 1 1 D 1 \ ) D 11 1011 / 7 �. $ /4 1 D ►1 p 5 Z �.� A o LND-10-0345 EUA -99 -094 -FP KC REC #19991 199 I �, ��o � o ti n bA�. JAS, a5, r1 1° MMOR#947792 �.°�' �Ib olio - P 9 Nti1 '��, ►�'. lo,°l' �0,9•'� n nv 019 /e6.90 /fd.7u 125,0 -_�.- ----- _. _ o / '1� /G :y 30" r 6 ,5 (Co.r s9z,/� /6 t97d - - - _ _ t---- --- -�:`� -�-""' fli��._._ _�• _-QQ,�//�� _�sv. i s --- - - -- -- - - - °'1 I� • P of �c v cz 1. - iy gG//� il.`// .- _ /.�'i•OT /�4.0¢ T 39 ¢• .• r, RD. -T E sT 1819) --1311.17 S E. 128 r1-1 ST. r 4 � _ ... ...1..?� �jyAr- .. 4Lr /.z 94 - . "/• s� z-... 9.5871696 1 �i �O RC. - 8 i I ~' �. 4 L 5 7 I b- y t S E. 1 -. N ;. 70. o/ /`.c 1v, 2 3 28TH 5T. a ,, ��,-, .,, .3,4�� - /Yo% . ✓ Tr►rr. �h s rrr' 4 W 1 6 - 1 ` ,7- r� .. a = • ,� 1 I I. - •'/i •' 7 .a O/3-/ 3� d. ;/ 7,1 -r /6•,+. o, Al 636.2/ NW. .4 21i 5 VIfVG CO. AERIAL. 5URVE`5• o' Lar E/ F -R-, so <' 'rP is i,»•. �r ! 4� f A 10s234144. MAP /PE✓1sgr� j UNE l 9 ql l THIS VAP IS FOR THI'r PMO"l 0? , ASSISTING IA LOCA rINO Y011R FHOP1',P1'y 11M11 IS NOT UUARAXTrXVS TO SHOW �CCUKI'! 1t tIIT�A$10 UHMMPATA I E., i ALE: I" '��•~�,.�. 0 N E.1 0-23-5 _ SC N 88-1957W sr. - /294. s 1324.58 3 7 7, z I1(o zzs C` 1 3 2 .56 632. 28 e 11'3100 V4 tiI,(/ 05 - - o -7 s �- /� 30 30 .s 1 1 _. I I v J 1 n ►. ° v /•%0 9 �� ✓ v V 9 $50A2 l ° 10 ZD'Zo� o 17 3o 77/7 A! - 0 -as B . /9 7S /So 7s� 1 n 77 Gj •'6\ ONn m LLJ I 14 ►� `I I 3 77.09 7S 13 _ -¢y2.0 7 h "I P. o! \ N 9�- 20-06.y 032.07 oQ b2 SE. 121ST. S -T. 0 O 7S 7S 7.� g9 /.f 0. 0 4 I � r I �r 77. os N 7` c-• fib L I W\ /v C�` C,5 - Jo 7K 5-7 99-zo-/e a3/.6c /� LUo1 1 a0..;,2 �p•j - W - / J ° `• O to A '+ 0 c ZA 81 ti I ►�. r /�e. K N 2, 3 d 51/ 0. o aI � �I Ga.oz co.oz � Lso.o7 1 ('4. vl 'I //3 1 2).2 N D. S T. 4o z•/ej , 63/ 8S _. - - - ---- - - ,„ S E _ .3G/. BS ri N �w 1 Vm P`' 4i J�2�- poll 11 O � I see D W. to TO o � - C 802 ° A 0 ^ 1 A /P y 5P /•,x9 v Pct. - ,SoJ.c.i Sy15°.71 N. 09.zcc -2w '_so - I m /fo M n fn 1 I H k1 N ^ o ti5�ry Itti` Pcl.2; olio • 9 I � t; M VL - 'U „XPi,' o eei • zo - rd. W. Id�6'; y5 ,JT- '� 0. Izo.-I N,ee•z.• alv,e - N +. .��. �! o I ��.le •� N ell too � n `? , c . "'A• ti a1.1.0 t4 ul/ In 0. 7 t ou.°e•io IN I� -c 3gd.71 > _ 30•.7 / d IfN Lo darl. '� I 2 .84 I, 0 Q... 1" ' 0 jo_ ueu. �sM, 90' RD '�1 70' cone Ec�,r • LOT 2 14 z I s � , I � �, 1� SAl�1o'3I"f I)r•3S K:, SP 480111 - 8?06180434 ops N 2'305 ' U�11 ti� V1 0l g9 P,- I v A. Lor tt L50 I,,,q\ � o °1' _ __ - (�IA, OAc -qi V 90 A X60 W I o Ila.o9 �`0 9s �� 04 "1 p o e h (f) Q I W cl i o•zb Ac 0.t7Ac' •.9 ,{C �,5o 11 .oe ! S M � ►: CO 0 1 �� ¢ak 144 1149.70 ia••a3.7�' I l V I � y A I 3/9 rso N V 283 AG' �jPy �` o ,1,I,�k �1 13hZ�o 231 30 I 'Z� O , /SO Ica/2r 9l.eor �' p 13s A" AO- *4W <779Gd/80 0d1A`- I I h 1.30 LOT r - LOT 2 LOT 3 �NN�.i(/"`T�oN 3 24e �h Tyr. A N KC SP 776 04 REV, -7904120 66 � h N It I I 0GJ� ! .5 �. "' LOT 4 AV ° 9 - 10-4 17 �N 0.19 ° /pro (�9 I _ p, 2S I ADL_ 7.3 ISO .27S.-09 "� _ e ° - - I` 1 . 7 -_ /s �. 12's0220 0210 x0200 0190 0190 0170 0160 /iii. 2S /So. 25 300. *57 330. -0-9 _ , 11 s, ee- zo-srE 26c 330. 49 �� '� 3�^. ► I RENT N LIMITS `2 y x 1��SO�G 4 NE 4TH PLACE �A34 L n06 Zp0 � i T A ON WIJ LO A N W Q N d 30130 LOT 2 J vl �I 7o9�. z7 200 1 I I •a a N � Q vo 01 2 re h /TO \ (\ ,^ W /2 92. B* 322.84 I O 0 ,o. �, I I,a�AG• l_ Z72. I �I N 63/. d?Z So /20 )Ills, �ZI 3q 5 ° 5 I21� -3 PG' • o° ` Ac. a o' Z 3g�' �• 38 ' 10(� � Sre,�' 341 p 1iN 330. f! Jgo• ao o � h ('i o ° Z�32o /to w �Ln m 1 w r a.o �o co /oo -, a S&AG� a Ae, o I ob 0 04 aco. ze /oo j/ I-IT5/7 Lo iSC•�a v I Ile 1% 130 33c. 2a L +c L0 i -q s-" 4s92,/26 I N .... -n-. . &- T 7 n A CED (PLANNING) DEPT FILE LUA-01-084 , � �' �� i,� 1 � ��r�.��3�� _�`� ti �� - '�, � 'r - rr , ��.Irt�:�►��.�� 7J.� V��:�l�l1��L� �X L�✓Vl'VI�J.i�.r DEVELOPMENT 1V�E�I�.IRANDU`M �� Date: February 14, 2011 , ` To: City CEerk's Offi�e �rom: StacX M Tucl�er � _�u_b��ect: Land Use F�I� C�osevut ' . ` I��Iq��1�111r1�1�1 , rl�l� I�Yii�M�� P1e�se cam��te the following infbrm�tion to facilitate_project closeout and indexing by the �ity C1erk's�3ffi�e. pro�e��1�rt�e: �hamracic Annexatlon �.UA {,f�il+��Nurnber. LU�i�01-084, A Cross-�e�erences: A-Ui-003; A-08-Q0�; LUAQB-131 /�K'A`s. ;�``�:.. P�►��Manag�t:�: ' . Dort Er�ckson ' �,`; Accept�nce Date: )ane 19, 2001 � - � `�:'°�: A If n#: pR '� Mark Hoti�nd � t�wnerr . ' _` :,±Cont�a�:x__ : ' Don Erlckson :��9t�! ��fii�i�: _ �+ci��i�t D�te: July 3�, 2001 , ��`� . � ' ��kppe��'t��t{e: Au$t�st 20, 2001 � 'l�t�t�rristrativ� pen�al: . ��;i�a1 Period End�: P-�b�f+�,��8aring Datet ; Dat,e A�eai�d to M�X:. � �, By w��: , � HEX.De�o�. Date: _.t..,. , _"� �iate Appe�i�i! #o Cauncit: ��Whom.,.,;y e � � �l�+�if : � - Date: �±t��i�`-�" .�9 Number: ' , ��t��an; Environmentat �e�i�w f�r, th� proposed rezaning af 66.16-acre annexa�ion ��t��S� Ifing G��tnty`s R-4 zone to R�ntari's�R-S zt�ne: � �. ;'��;:; ti ;,. � '" ' South of N� 14�' Street Eas�n�Jericho Piace . ,_._�.�.;.. �: .. , !��t,��,��`urt�r action on thts flle. 2"� Annexat�on r�quest recef�ed under LUAU8-131 - '{?�t�:��x��7R� 546�,adopted annexation and rezoning for LUA08-131 (Shamrock Annexation). ��1�) � �' ��'� � � � Annexation Review Form - Shamrock Annexation (60%) ( ) 10% Notice of Intent (X) 60%Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility �`��f CITVOFFENTON Fire Water Utility ,� ;P.;, �'�� RECEIVED �� „ Parks Wastewater Utility �`"' � ; Police Trans ortation �'�;r � �� MAR 1 1 1002 p �f��,,��-,��.,�,.�� Public Works Maintenance Current Planning " �:1��r -�,V BUILDING DIVISION � ��tv FROM : Don Erickson, AICP / Senior Planner Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT : Proposed Shamrock Annexation Location : Generally north and west of the existing city limits north of NE 4"'Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 150'h Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. Date Circulated: 03/08/02 Comments Due: 03/19/02 General Information Area : 66,6 acres Street length ; 0 Assessed Value : $6,829,000 Estimated Population : 65 Current Uses Residential ; ± 20 dwellings, majority of area vacant Commercial ; N/A Industriai ; N/A Public ; Streets only, Comp Plan : Resource Conservation Designation Future Uses; ; Single family Future Po ulation • Est, 480 erson 260 homes Reviewing Department/Division: � 1, Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �� _ ��.,�� `�� , � �� i� > .�.�` �� 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? �� ?�,�ty�� 'L�GG- / � , ��.Ya ��l6�'�i�� in x��2il-� �� i'.�✓.i/�%��tr'�� -�� ?i�'� �j�L � .� G�.e ,�.�' f,� �=�-��,��,�t��.��-�r� (Over) � � 3, Does this proposed annexatio represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? �«.� 4, What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identi an other costs the Cit would incur as a result of this annexation? � fY Y Y /i��1��T7 _5 `�a��-��`��'��"� � �,�1ri��-��% �� c��i��-��s >�orrlo�t�'/,� ,��t�s�'��'�, 5, Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currentiy owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? �J �Qw b, Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) ��.� �� L�� General recommendation and comments; ,��f,��/�ri�� /�� 4�.� ��.�/�C�'� . -` � Si nature: ' � ate; - / ' . ^ CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION MAS TER APPLICATION OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION(cont) Note: If there is more than on legal owner,please attach an additional notarized EXISTING LAND USE Master application to each owner. (S): NAME: Various(see attached list) 36 parcels with single-family dwellings and 16 parcels that are vacant. ADDRESS: City: ZIP: PROPOSED LAND USE(S): TELEPHONE NUMBER: Non-project action. No development is proposed as a consequence of this annexation. New zoning would allow CONTACT PERSON/APPLICANT approximately 440 dwelling units on this 66.16 acres. NAME: Sarah Slatten NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES(estimated): Not applicable ADDRESS: Cam West Development,Inc. 9720 NE 120`h Place,Suite 100 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Residential Rural C�cy: Kirkland,WA zIP: 98034 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 4ZS-HZS-I9SS PROPOSED COMPREHENSNE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: No chan e ro osed PROJECT INFORMATION EXISTING ZONING: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Residential-4 du/ac(Kin Count ) Shamrock Annexation—60%Petition to Annex PROPOSED ZONING: Residential—5 du/net acre(Cit of Renton) SITE AREA(SQ.FT OR ACREAGE): PROPERTY/PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION and ZTP CODE: 66.16 acres The proposed subject annexation is bounded by the PROJECT VALUE: Renton city limits on a portion of the west annexation N/A boundary, on the south(NE 5`� Street,if extended), and on the east(150`''Avenue SE, if extended). Its northern IS THE SIT'E LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PR07'ECTION AREA? boundary is approximately SE 120�'Street, if extended. prea is outside of existing city limits and therefore not designated as APA. KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF Multiple. Please see attached list. ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? The northeastern portion of the annexation azea includes a portion of desi nated Wetland 17 K. H:�EDNSP�PAA�Recent Annexations\Shamrock\Shamrock�cnaster application template.doc\d .� � � ' I,EGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach separate sheet if needed) S�� attael�ccl le�al �l��cri��tion TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Ctzeck all application types that apply -- City staff��ill determine fees. X ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION REZONE $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ TEI�IPORARY PERMIT $ _SHORT PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _PRELIMINARY PLAT $ GRADE&FILL PERMIT $ _FINAL PLAT $ (No. Cu. Yds: ) VARIANCE $ (from Section: ) $ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT $ `VAIVER $ _PRELIMINARY ROUTINE VEGETATION _FINAL MANAGEMENT PERMI7' $ BINDWG SITE PLAN MOBILE HOME PARKS $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DE�'ELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USF, $ _VARIANCE $ ��iEN1PTION $ NO CH,IRGE _ENVIRONI��IENTAL REVIE�'V $ RE�'ISION AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP — See 60% Petition I, (Print Name) , declare that I am(please check one) _the ow�er of the property involved in this application, the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are io all respects true aod correct to the best of my knowled�e and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that s�o zd this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/the�r free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Name of O�vner/Represeatative) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) (S�cnature ut O�vnedRepresentati�el 1�7y appointment expires: _ (THIS SECTION"CO BE C011IPLETEll BY CIT1'STAFF.) City File Numher ECF SA R SHPL CU LLA PY FP TP SP R�'MP �' AAD W Ff'UD Sn1 Sh1E n1HP }3SP A CPA TU"t'AL.FEES�25.50 _ TOTAL POSTAG�PR(�V]DED $ _ 11 ,LI��'tiP''�I':\A'�Kc�cnt \nnr.��uuns`,Shamrc�el.\Sh.unr��l.�n�estr[ ;�p��h�,iuru IrmF,l.11��ln�',,d • ■ � _� I �� ■ �'ri �� .i� � - �� 'i:i�: �n�� n : . ��"ao�;�� .... ■ ��""'--! � � � � : - �rrr I l�i�� - . �..■ .7� �■ .�:�� 13 �� !�•��,�• �: �;�I��I 1 �i � �� "�� ' �� ' � - ■ '�' .i� �S �� ' � � ' � �� ,r`� �� I -= == ■ � � _� .. r. .� � • • _ ■ �� _ � � �� 1�r� w�11� ;,� — � �.�� r�o�� ■� ii7—� . :: .� � 1�� 1 �� - -., �11� . .. 111 `I � �v� ■ i :" '� 1�1111.: �� ., .. ��`��.� z� �� == � � �� Y � :� - � x �,��,��-,�� a ��,�;��y�`�: i `� � �� 3 f�k�� X-x��T�`�'4�� F.•�Li1^�*.� ��+. � �� • -- - � y �`�� $'C�� X� �� `-9'�..'�'{_ � • .• - - � - � -Sv'a-� �'� 'h5x_:�4��,'-�!'�� 3_�. :.s' �� _. -- - 11►� ?°��.��w"u�f-,��..� 9��'�' v � �� '��`��.�� ,� ' *��L7 �Y'�IJ� � � T�i1i- � �l�111►/ �G7 ._ . � � , � �tllt: �°� � ' ' ,� ��9 � ■ 1� IL�li11 � ��s �F� � :.� � �s� ,� �� /� � �-�� ,`� � ��.___�� i ':� �� ►IQ�'� � _ � �� '�. �,..'�� : �� Ea �ca � � �� ``, �� -� ��y�� - �--� � � � � ■ � �n � "._�*'..r �IA1 � � ' - �� i� �� i �■ _ . �` `�, � �;. �.i � � 'irt� [�7 . ♦ � � "� �� Fa � ///Ih( � ■ � �� i r�-. F''�� '�'! � ' ur� �u u ��1�� IIi i � � : -� �i i ��;�� 111 .� �,�� ' :� irr� i , � • _ �� . :.n �o �, - � .. . 111 , !� 1�� , i ii i , � CI�I� [-�111■ �� " ' ■ -� ■„ � � �� i■ �� ' 1��,�,11� ��I � .. �� "�� 1 _ `I� ■ •��•�� :�IIII! � ... ��i ii � � ...� �� E 1 �� •• ��, � _ � ■ ,..�... .� ■ �i � . -�� t� - �� ...� . � � � ��l� . ..... -��'�1�: '.� � �� ►•..�� i� �■�: � ' ��: i� �� fI11�� -• ��i ��/ : � .. � .: ►��Iil -�!� � � � - - _ �� ' • � � ' � . • ' � . • 1 : 11 . 11 ::��: • ' . • ��r' • � 11 . . ,. . :. ,. • .�., .� � �„ � •�.. �.,� • •�. -. • � :. •. �' � . � � � `M,� `' - - - _ If --- _ --- , J � I - - . - : ; I , -----i - -i I ' ' �' ; 1 _ ? � --�- - - -- ----- I -- - -- - ----- - -- - --- - - - - -- � -- . - -- --- --- --- ' ; , , ; - - ; j �- � ' � � i � � � - - --,_�., .�_ _L_ �,,,_ -- - �- �� . � \ -------------- ----� � ----- � � � 1 �-a-- --- -------_-==--�-- � � --- -- --- -- -�------ i - ! � � � � - i � -------- �� ---- - . - ---- -- � --- ` ii - -- ----- i - _ � -- � ----- --- ---- =-- - - ` -- , -�---- ---- ____ � --� -- � � - �- -i: �- j , � ------ --_ ' _ _ - --- _�� , =---- - - - ----- __ , � --- -- ; -------- --- I ---- -- ---- ,_-- --- - - - - - -- � � �- _ \ - - - I �-�, - � --1 _l __ �,'� --�----1---- � � � _ � � � - - --- -- --_ - � � � - � - - -- � , - _ , � --- --- -- �- - �� -- - ; . -- -=-- - -- ;= � -- —-. ; - -- ----�-- �__ ------ � � , r __�-- _ ---------T�=====-___ _ — -- ' - I i , - �-,-- E - _ . � � � , � - __� ; _ __ , � __- _ � -_-_ _ _ , __�__ __ � __ ; � __ , ,� , _--��_ __ � , _ =- - - ��,\ ,' - � --- `, _ �` -- ` �- � - ' ,�,—�.::. . - �. i �� 1 `i I I �� , �� -- , — 1��\ _ , \� I - � � "-- �\ __ -- I ( /�,\� � , �\ �__- �li �• � �� I � \ � i _ l �-- �y j - \ -- ` - r-- - � , E---- �--� � ( I � ' --- i - � � � � -' l � ' ' �� . ( \� i � - — I �__ I ; \ ` , � _ I � , �� . ,- -__� _ "'-_ r_- -- _ __ --__ - I I 0.. � � Proposed Shamrock Annexation o 300 600 Figure 3: Topography Map ^� 1m Interval Contour 1 .7�60Q �� Existing Corporate Boundary .�1} �,� F.�„n�em�I>rvelnpment.Ncighburhoods&Strategic Pl,mntng ;,� , ;��r��i:<,�..��i,��,«�� ProposFd Anne,.�,tion Boundary � n��N,.,�� '�, ; _�,,.,.. ��, - - - - - -. - --- . - ''�✓ ,,r►' -- i � I � I r - ---- -- - - °v--�i' ---- - --- ------ � �� p -- ---- --� -- -- -- ----- �] �--- ❑ � o � __, i ---- � ° � ;-- - � - - �;� � � �- - - - -- -- --- - --- -- -� - - i , , 4.� , - �-- � , -�- - - -� -- � �'j---; ------�--- � I --- --- - �- - --- � d I a � ----, - � ---- ----- - - - . �-- Q ---- -------- ❑ --------- _-I ' � '� _ � ____ �;. _________ ; __- � ___________1___ � , i � — ___ ' � , a _________ __T_ � ___�_� _� , �_________ ___ __ ! . ____ __ I ° � e - - ' , --�-- ' # -; �- � � � � _ � , -- _ - -- L_-- � � ------------ ---�----�---- - -,��-- ----- � � � - -L � ' '� � � sL--i- -- ----I ��-�-- I � -� ---- � �i -- -- ' � � � -- � - -- - ---- -- ------ --- - --�---- -- �- --- -- -- ---- ' Q ; � T--= - - �'� \ - _ 'r�l` .. � � � � � - ,� � -- ,-e �.,m . . � - - �--- - � -�� - I -- - - - - - - - - � - - • - - - - i- ---; � i - r-- j ' - -- ' i I~ _ i i ; ------ -- � - -- - -- - -- ---- - --- -�--- , � . ---- I � - - - I --- , --- ,- �--- � . - i -- ---- - -- �J , -- ------- � i � ---=--- • � - --- -- ------- - I • . ----- - -------- - -- ----- 1--------- � � I ---J ------- - --- -- - - ---- ---------- ; _ . . ----- /. . 1 • • --- --��-- I ----- ------ \\ ---- --- - �----- ------- - --- ,----- - __ ,: .. I ; -- _ ' --- ---- __ � - , I � ; , l - -- - � , ---- - -- �-- - ----- , -- --�- ----- ---- � - � � - - r- � I I •I�� I I �- - ---1- - ' - - -- ; ---1 - -1 -- � - - --- � -- -- � - - -}-- - ----1-- - -- -' � - ------ ------ --- ; � -- --- -----� - --- � T---- __ ��-�--rr_____-_------ --- - ----L----- _ - - � �- -- - ----�----- ----- --- � � - ----1-- _ � -- - �:� ,� �� -- --- ----- � ,- , .� -- i �--- � f i r .•/ ! ---- �� !�-- � � / ' � � -------- �---- � ,. �---- i -� -----�----� 1 --- , --- � I ; � � � -_ � � ; � i , � . � � � � ; ; Pr 0 osed Shamrock Annexation 0 800 1600 p Figure 5: Sensitive Areas Map 1 :�,�00 �� Fconnmic I)ercl��pment,Ne�ghb�,rhnud�ti Stra�e�,�c PLmnir�g d. .� Ditch and/or Stream ��s Ex�stina Co�pot8te Boundary e � Sur l arl.�n 4dmini.trat��i (� Uel F��..,nn �'f, �,� ��,,,,r_,,,,i _ __� Wetlanris Pmposed Annexation Boundary . � � SHAI��1}�()CIL f1NNEXA`I�ION LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tlle South half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter and the North half(1/2 j of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; TOGETHER WI1��the South half(1/2) of the North half(112) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10, EXCEPT the North 132 feet thereof; AND the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, of Section 11, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,King County, � Washington. y � � " SHAPAROCK EXPANSION ARFA PROPERTIES 2001 Qssessments January 25,2002 Parcel t� Parcel# Ma�or M�nor Owner Land Value Improvement Value Total Value Parcel opting in Comments 0 102305 5U30 Palanchuk,Georgry&Natalya $ 140,000 00 $2,4,OOu p0 $224,000.00 $224,000 00 received 102'05 9259 Powers,Jack&Dense � 62,000 UO $113,OOD 00 $175,000 00 $175,000.00 received 102�05 9�?9 Shamrock Highl2nds LLC $ 116,G00 00 $SO,OOG 00 $166,000.00 $166,000.00 received 102��05 9021 Wegner,Brett&Mark $ ?8,000.00 $151,OU0 UO $229,000 OD $229,000 00 received 112305 9092 Dubuski,Darryl $ 67,000 00 $128,000 DO $195,000 00 $195,000.00 ai Renton 112305 9010 Jarvis,Jerry $ 80,000 00 E37,006 00 $111,000 00 $111,000.00 at Renton 102305 90<2 Shamrock Highlands LLC $ 151,000 00 �123,000 DO $274,000 00 $274,000 00 recelved 1023U5 �026 Bashary,Shay $ 78,000 OD $3i,00C.00 $115,000.00 $115,ODO.DO received 102305 9170 Hodge,Harold D � 67,000 00 $124,U00 00 $151,000.00 $191,000.00 received 1G23p5 9174 Shamrock Highlands LLC $ 98,000 00 $157,000 00 $255,000 00 $255,000.00 received 1G2305 9d15 Shamrock Highlands LLC $ 156,000 00 SO 00 �156,D00.00 $I56,000.00 received 112305 9078 Tomlinson,Enc&Autumn $ 57,000 00 $75,000 00 $136,000 00 $�.00 NO 112305 9075 Engh,Dale&Mary(Parke Ownerl $ 57.000 00 $81,U00 00 $138,000 00 $0.00 NO 10'1305 9�91 Shamrock Highlands LLC $ 88,000.00 $115,000 00 $203,000 00 $203,000 00 received 102305 y031 Shamrock Highlands LLC $ 114,000 00 $0 00 5114,000.00 $114,000.00 received 102305 90d2 Phung,An T $ 161,000 00 $139,000 00 $300,000.00 $300,000 00 received copy 102305 9069 Lai,�dan-Ling $ 104,000_00 $0 00 $104,000 00 $104,000 00 received 102305 9384 Shamrock Highlands LLC $ 98,000 00 $178,000 00 g276,OD0 DO �276,D00.00 received 102305 9:;t53 P.iartin,Kenneth $ 114 000 00 $173,000 00 $287,OD0 00 $0 60 NO 112305 9007 Nguyen,Ngoc $ 57,000.00 $94,00000 $151,00000 50.00 NO 112305 9091 EllislDream Craft S 114,000 00 $iB4OGO 00 $132,000 00 50.OG haven't recerved 162"305 9G38 Knch,John 8 Patncia $ 62,000.00 $88,000 00 E150,000 00 y150,000.00 received 102305 535.`i Kelty,BryantS Nuiko � 62,000 00 $62,G00 00 $124,OOG 00 $�24,0OO.OD received t 123u`, b0?7 Scott,Sharon Ehzabeth $ 109,OGD 00 $1�7 OUO 00 5238 ODO GO 50 00 NO i'��?�3fi5 'i341 Gilbert 5 62.Dn�Ci0 �1Zt'.GGO 00 $190.00G 00 50.G0 tJ0 1;72;'�0.`, 9U70 P,4etcalfe,William $ 57,00000 $d1,GUGOG S13P,,00000 $G.00 Pd0 �735�0 00.'.0 f.lunro,Richard 8 Barbar:i .b 2u.G00 GD �0 f,�� $?u.000 00 T�Q.00 NO J'�+20 0'?�n Bowen.P,alph Jr 8 Br�nda $ 57,�G0 00 $r�UO gs7,000 00 �57,000 0� recero�d 273920 in�10 Bowen,P,aiph Jr 8 Branda � 57,OOG 00 ;0 00 �;7,r,p0 OU �57,000 00 rer_ewzd �7�92G 016G Kingston,Charhe&Stacy 5 57,D00 00 $1 73,UGU 00 .j171,OG0 00 317"I,000 00 received �7',920 0150 Knstofenon,Richa«i $ 57,000 GO $0 00 $57 000 00 $57,000 00 received 2'352t1 01=1�� k:nstofersnn,Richard $ 57,000 OU $0�i0 g57,000 00 �57,000 00 received �73320 nn:�� olunro,P,icha«i&BarGara � ;7.000 00 $1G�s,q��(i GO 3160,000 00 50.G0 tJ0 �7?'-i20 O7?.0 Bcwen,Ralph Jr �°.Branda ., `7 n0U OG $93 O(�0 00 y150,000 00 $15U,000 00 racer.-ed 27:i520 017U Haminond.Jamas&Enht, $ 57,000 Gi! $95,Gu0 00 5152,000 GO 53.G0 undea�ed 27322u 02b0 P,iley,John $ 57,000 00 �0 GO $57,000 00 y0.00 undecided 27392D G050 Flattum,Partiaa $ 57,000 00 $106,OOG UO $165,000 00 SQ00 NO "L�39�0 012D Flarium.Partiaa � 5�,OOO,UO $0 UO $57,000.00 50.,�0 NO 273920 0180 Repenn,Rodger $ 57,000 00 $100,000 00 $157,000 00 �0.60 undecided 2?39"[0 0250 Repenn,Rodger $ 57,000.00 $32,D00.00 $89,000 00 50.06 undecided 2?3920 0060 Larson,James 8 Glona $ 57,000 00 $77,G00.00 $134,OD0 00 �0.00 NO 2'3920 0110 Donald Sikes $ 57,000 00 30 00 $57,000 00 $0 p0 NO 2,'392G 0790 Halfhill,David&Susan $ 57,000 00 $94,000 00 $151,U00 00 $151,000 00 recewed 2'3920 G240 Repenn,Rodger $ 57,OG0 00 $0 00 $57,000 00 5G.00 undecided 273920 0071 Hohlbein,Erik&Michelie $ 57,000.00 $1D5,00000 $162,000.00 $OAD NO 273920 C100 Sikes,Donald Jr &Clndy $ 57,000 00 $96,OOD 00 $�53,000 00 _:;._f, NO 2i 3920 02U0 Sharkey,Douglas $ 57,000 00 �96,000 DO $153,000 00 $153,000 00 received 2'3920 0230 Sharkey,Douglas $ 57,000 00 �0 00 $57,000 00 $57,000 00 received 273520 0080 Bielka,Ronald $ 57,000 00 393,000 00 $150.000 00 $150,000-00 received 2 i�520 0050 Bielka,Ronaid $ 57,000 00 gG 00 $57,000 00 $57,000 00 received 273920 0210 Sharkey,Douglas � 57,000 00 30 00 $57,000 00 $57,000.00 received 273920 0220 Sharkey,Douglas $ 57,000 00 $0 00 �57,000 00 $57,000 00 received Total $7,421,000.00 $4,593,000.00 60% $4,452,600.00 DeficienU Over -$140,400.00 } ' � � � RENTON CTTY COUNCIL . Regular Meeting August 6,2001 Council Chambers Monday, 7:30 p.m. M I N U T E S Municipal Building CALL TO ORDER Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF DAN CLAWSON, Council President; TOIVI NELSON;RANDY CORMAN; COUNCILMEMBERS DON PERSSON; KING PARKER; TERRI gRIERE,KATHy KEOLKER- WHEELER. CITI'STAFF IN JESSE TANNER,Mayor;JAY COVINGTON,Chief Administrative Officer; ATTENDANCE LAWRENCE J. WARREN,City Attorney;MARILyN pETERSEN,City Clerk;GREGG ZIl�Il��IERMAN,planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; MIKE yVEBgy,Human Resources Administrator; SUE CARLSON,Economic Development Administrator;ALEXANDER PIETSCH, Economic Development Director; JENNIFER HENNING,Principal Planner; OWEN DENrtISON, Senior Planner; ABDOUL GAFOUR,Water Utility Supervisor;DEREK TODD,Assistant to the CAO; CHIEF GARRY ANDERSON,Police Deparhnent. PRESS Oscar Halpert,Renton Reporter PROCLAMATION A proclamation by Mayor Tanner was read declaring the week of August 6th Yokohama International Girls' through 11,2001,to be "Yokohama International Girls'Institute Suiryo High Institute Suiryo High School School Week"in the City of Renton, in tribute to the Japanese students who Week—August 6 to 11 visit Renton as part of their academic home stay program in order to promote multi-cultural understanding in the quest for global peace and prosperity. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION. CARRIED. Mayor Tanner and Iwao Abe,Principal of Suiryo High School,exchanged gifts, and Suiryo students sang the American National Anthem. RECESS MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PERSSON,COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 8:42 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:50 p.m.;roll was called; all Councilmembers present. Principal Abe stated that the exchange program has been in existence for 15 years with over 300 students participating. He expressed his appreciation to the City of Renton and the host families. PUBLIC MEETING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Shamrock,NE accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public meeting 4th St& 148th Ave SE to consider the 10%Notice of Intent Petition to Annex for the Shamrock Lu /t O�_n9a,y Annexation for approximately 66.6 acres abutting the City boundary north of r� vU �4�St. and located east and west of 148th Ave. SE between 150th Ave. SE on the east and 144th Ave. SE,if extended,on the west. Owen Dennison, Senior Planner,stated that the proposed annexation is one of five pending or ongoing annexations in the vicinity. T'he proposed Shamrock annexation area is partially developed, and existing King County zoning is R-4, which allows four dwelling units per gross acre. He described the topographical features of the site which is generally flat with a mapped wetland � � • ►'� August 6,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 256 located on the northeast side. He also noted that the site is located within the service area for Water District 90. Mr.Dennison described potential issues related to the annexation which include: future zoning designation; traffic and recreational impacts; surface water drainage; and Issaquah School District Impact Fees. Continuing,Mr.Dennison indicated that potential zoning under the Rural Residential Land Use Designation includes RC(Resource Conservarion; one dwelling unit per 10 acres),R-1 (Residential Single Family; one dwelling unit per acre),and R-5 (Residential Single Family; five dwelling units per acre). Reporting that the proposed annexation is generally consistent with Renton's Comprehensive Plan and the objectives of the King County Boundary Review Board,Mr.Dennison recommended that Council accept the 10%Notice of Intent to Annex petition. Responding to Council President Clawson's inquiry regaxding drainage standards,Mr.Dennison explained that the drainage system consists of loosely organized ditch drains that do not form a cohesive system. As development occurs,new systems would be required and tied into the City's surface water drainage system. Correspondence was read from Claudia Donnelly, 10415 147th Ave. SE, Renton,98059,stating her concerns regarding the potential impacts the annexation will have on schools since the annexation area is within the Issaquah School District. Public comment was invited. Mary Kay Wegner, 12211 148th Ave. SE,Renton,98059,stated her objection to the proposed annexation,saying that the City has failed to demonstrate the benefits of the annexation. She commented that if her property is annexed,her monthly utility bills and property tax assessment would increase,and she noted the additional expenses she will incur when she is forced to change her address since she operates a business from her home. Claudia Donnelly, 10415 147th Ave. SE,Renton, 98059,urged Council to increase the impact fees it collects for the Issaquah School District. Expressing her concerns regarding the overcrowding of the schools and the need for portable classrooms to accommodate the students,Ms.Donnelly urged Council to deny the annexation request until it conducts a study to determine the impact of the annexation on schools within the Issaquah School District. John Pavlik, 12610 148th Ave. SE,Renton,98059,objected to the proposed annexation for the following reasons: the lot sizes will be smaller under Renton's R-5 zoning,and there will be an increase in traffic with new development. He urged Council to annex only the proposed developments. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON,COUNCIL: ACCEPT THE 10%NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX; AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 60%PETITION TO ANNEX;REQUIRE ADOPTION OF CITY ZONING ON TAE PROPERTY CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSNE PLAN;AND REQUIltE THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSUIVIE A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CTTY'S BONDED INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED. ' �r � '�Ir'' ` August 6,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 257 Councilman Parker suggested that Ms.Wegner discuss the impacts the proposed annexation may have on her home-based business with Mr.Dennison. Mayor Tanner pointed out that the City's overall tax rate is less than unincorporated King County's tax rate. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexarion: Piele, 142nd Ave accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public hearing SE&NE 6th St to consider the 60%Notice of Intent Petition to Annex for the Piele Annexation and proposed R-8(Residential Single Family; eight dwelling units per acre) zoning for approximately 20 acres located east and west of 142nd Ave. SE (Hoquiam Ave.NE), south of NE 6th St. (if extended)and west of 144th Ave. SE(if extended). Owen Dennison, Senior Planner, stated that the proposed annexation area is comprised of 23 single-family homes on 30 parcels. Existing King County zoning is R-4,which allows up to a base density of four units per gross acre(up to six units per acre with incentives and transfer of density credits),and Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates this area Residential Single Family for which R-8 (Residential Single Family; eight dwelling units per acre)zoning is proposed. Noting that an issue was raised concerning the potential use of private access easements as public roadways during the public meeting held on March 12th,Mr.Dennison indicated that the use of these easements as public roadway is not necessary because access can be taken from 142nd Ave. SE. Mr.Dennison noted another issue concerning a home-based business in the annexation area. T'he business owner,J.J.Madison,did not think the business would be allowed under Renton regulations and he would be forced to close his business if annexed to the City. Mr.Dennison described the efforts the City is making to work with the affected business owner. Continuing,Mr.Dennison stated that Water District 90 would provide water service,the City can provide access to sewers, and 142nd Ave. SE is in a deteriorated condition and requires an overlay to bring the street up to City standards. Detailing the fiscal impacts of the proposed annexation,Mr. Dennison reported that an annual surplus in the amount of$4,885 is estimated under existing development, and once fully developed,an estimated annual surplus of$20,511 is expected. He noted an additional one-time expense of $54,653 is estimated for the acquisition and development of parks and for the 142nd Ave. SE overlay. Concluding,Mr.Dennison stated that the proposal is consistent with City policies for annexation and recommended that Council accept the 60%Petition to Annex. Correspondence was entered into the record from J.J.Madison, 12407 142nd Ave. SE,Renton,98059,requesting that his property be exempted from the proposed annexation. He stated that he operates a home small business and this type of business is not allowed under City of Renton regulations. Councilmembers expressed concern about Mr.Madison's home-based business and a question was raised regarding non-conforming use status. Explaining that the business must be a legal use in King County before it can achieve legal non- conforming use status,City Attorney Larry Wanen indicated that is an issue that would have to be resolved. Correspondence was read from John McTighe,24929 267th Ave. SE, Ravensdale,98051,requesting that the proposed annexation area be zoned R-5 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Barbara Alther, first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the � SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal F newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six ��'�� ENVIRONMENT`At R�1tI�W ' months prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the COMMirTEE � English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, RENTON,WASHINGTON. � Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a legal Tne Environmentai Review �, Committee has issued a Determination news�,aper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King of Non-Significance for the fol�owing ' County. project under the authority of the The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County Renton Municipa4 Code. SHAMRO�K ANNEXATION Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the LUA-01-084,A,R � subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Proposed rezoning of 66.16-acre � annexation site from King County's Shamrock Annexation R-a Zone to taenton�s R-5 Zone. �Location: to the west, �orth, east and south of the interseetion ,of as published on: 8/6/01 �aatn Avenue 5E and SE 124th Street. Appeals of the environmental The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of determination must�be filed in writing $59.13, charged to Acct. No. 8051067. on or before 5:00 PM August 20th, 2001.Appeals must be filed in writing The cost above includes a $6.00 fee for the printing of the affidavits. together witn the fequired $�5.00, application fee with:Mearir�Exautnner, City of Renton, 1085 Scruth t3rady Legal Number 9369 y�y, q,��a�,, yyq �, to' tt� �irro��a�„vg�t3 of ---�,��;--,,. � � � �: . �� • �: . ,, . ` ' ,`p / � tFie�appe�� oc�ss rriay 'ined from the Renton City Cierk's.Office, Legal C rk, South ounty Journa� (425)430-6510. Published in the South County �..Q, Joum�Nuguat 6.2001.93� � Subscribed and swom before me on this�' �lay of � , 2001 �� — ��L�`r�,t�11!`.7 I►,f Fti A`�i ```�'` ,_..•('�°'J%,l��,'/. v.: v `�.:�.'� , ._ . `cP'. +�� : = Notary Public of the State of Washington ;�.�;, ��.��_; residing in Renton `�.:�" .•�.�0�.��' King County, Washington '��''�.� . ..��;��`��• ��I11111111►��` � ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION SHAMROCK ANNF�(ATION LUA-01d84,A,R The applicant.Padfic Land Consuttin9.has requea(etl Env6onmental Review for ihe proposed razon4g of tlns%.16-aae enne�tion sNe trom Kig Countys R-4 Zone to R�ton's R-5 Zane.The ske is bcatetl approz'anatey 600'noM of NE 4'"Street and's boundetl on Uie west by Jerkho Avenue NE,M ezlandad, on the east by f 501°Avenue SE,A ezteMed,and on Ne noM by SE 121'Straet,if ezterMed.148° ' Ave+ue SE 0'averses Ihe anner.afbn site on a rwriNnoulh axis.SE 124�Street(NE 6�Place)intersects 146 Avenue SE m Ihe easL The southeazt camer of Ne sile includes a 26-lot su6d(wsion.The tracts ro ihe north and wesl are rypcatly 2.0 aaes a larger h size.Location:The 66.76 aue sile locatetl b the west.rwM,east aM soulh of Ihe intersectian of 748�Avenue SE and SE 124'"Street THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC)HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals o(ths environmenhl detertninatlon must be filed in writlny on or 6eforo 5:00 PM Auyu:t 20'",2001. Appeals must be flletl In writiny together with the requlrad 575.00 appliwtton(ee wiM:Hearing Ezamin�r,CNy of Renton,7055 South Grady Way.Ranton,WA 98055. App�al:M the Examiner an povam�d Ey Cky of RenWn AAunlcipal Code Sxtio�48•110.Additlonal intormaUon reqatdinq tM appsal procass may be o6nined from the Renton City Clerk's OHice,(425)�470-6510. Pro ose „Shamrock Annex tion t _ 124th p� 5 � I y � PI O N h t h St 1 d i 2n t �T FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DE��/ELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430.7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE 1MTHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please lnclude the proJect NUMBER when cailing for proper file ide�dftcation. CERTIFICATION I, f 1G �Y�' �.��r_u�t� , herebx certify that�� copies of the above docwnent were posted by me in �U conspicuous places on or nearby the described properly on �q. ) . n� Sigaed: n�� "� ATTEST: Subcribed orn baefore me,a No Public,in and for the State of Washington residing in � ��C�-s�� ,on the��` day of �-c-te� , �n� ti-�.. .„>> . _. ,v.da;m=x....:�, ��C��- � ? -t � ��Y' ,j!'��Y.A�9��FF d�-'-, �: -� ; •<, :., ��(,�G �� 'i `�F�j'�'�t" ,,:5 INGTON �, , �,. �+ �.3��=�1'�;�;d{�.�y wXPlRES fiAARiLYN KAMCHEFF �,,,,,�, �:��`t�:?� 2G03 �M�,'APP�Is�T!'��NT�XPIRES:6-2g03 �"`�' �' cy �-;- '�`" CITY (..� RENTON � Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 22, 2001 Mr. Mark Holiand Pacific Land Consulting, Inc. 13619 Mukilteo Speedway Lynnwood, WA 98037 SUBJECT: Shamrock Annexation and Rezone Project No. LUA-01-084,A,R Dear Mr. Holland: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-6581. For the Environmental Review Committee, .cr��. � Donald Erickson Senior Planner cc: Parties of Record: K. Wilson, M. Schirman, C. Wolf, T. Waters, D. Shenk, L. Shenk, J. Waltosz, M. Moore, C. Donnelly, P. Waters .�.> F.�'Yh�'• $ •f'Vo .�;{` =��,"L � , , � 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ��' ;....:,';34..� R��'. �This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer .�t'.�1�� cti �- '�'° CITY (� RENTON � Planning/Building/Public Works Department 7 e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Admiaistrator July 31, 2001 �r • Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on July 31, 2001: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE SHAMROCK ANNEXATION LUA-01-084,A,R The applicant, Pacific Land Consulting, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of this 66.16-acre annexation site from Kin�County's R-4 Zone to Renton's R-5 Zone. The site is located approximately 600'north of NE 4 Street and is bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the east by 150�'Avenue SE, if extended, and on the north by SE 121 St Street, if extended. 148th Avenue SE traverses the annexation site on a north/south axis. SE 124'h Street(NE 6'h Place) intersects 148th Avenue SE on the east. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger in size. Location: The 66.16 acre site located to the west, north, east and south of the intersection of 148`h Avenue SE and SE 124'h Street. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 2ptn 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-6581. r the Environmental Re ' C mittee, Donald Erickson ` Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) US Army Corp. of Engineers �a,��ti:..,,.,..,�,,,A� 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 �This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer �� - `� CITY (� RENTON � Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 31, 2001 Mr. Mark Holland Pacific Land Consulting, Inc. 13619 Mukilteo Speedway Lynnwood, WA 98037 SUBJECT: Shamrock Annexation and Rezone Project No. LUA-01-084,A,R Dear Mr. Holland: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on July 31, 2001, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non- Significance. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 2p`n, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425)430-6581.. �r the Environmental Review C m ittee, J � Dona rickson Project Manager cc: Parties of Record: K.Wilson, M. Schirman, C. Wolf, T.Waters, D. Shenk, L. Shenk, J.Waltosz, M. Moore, C. Donnelly, P.Waters �ns�e�t9r 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 �This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer qn✓ � CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLfCAT�ON NUMBER: LUA-01-084,A,R APPLICANT: Mark Holland, Pacific Land Consulting PROJECT NAME: Shamrock Annexation DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Pacific Land Consulting, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of this 66.16-acre annexation site from King County's R-4 Zone to Renton's R-5 Zone. The site is located approximately 600' north of NE 4'h Street and is bounded on the west b�tJericho Avenue NE, if ext�ended, on the east by 150 Avenue SE, if extended, and on the north by SE 121 Street if extended. 148 Avenue SE traverses the annexation site on a north/south axis. SE 124th Street (NE 6`� Place) intersects 148th Avenue SE on the east. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger in size. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The 66.16 acre site located to the west, north, east and south of the intersection of 148th Avenue SE and SE 124th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 2p'n 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICAT�ON DATE: August 6, 2001 DATE OF DECISION: July 31, 2001 SIGNATURES: % � re g im rman ministrator DAT Departme f P nning/Building/Public Works "��3��c�/ J m Shepherd, Admin strator DAT ; •ommunity Services Department � � ? �' i � ' � �j/� �� 1` Lee ` eler, F e hief DATE Re on Fire Department dnssign �' � NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. SHAMROCK ANNEXATION LUA-01-084,A,R Proposed rezoning of 66.16-acre annexation site from King County's R-4 Zone to Renton's R-5 Zone. Location: to the west, north, east and south of the intersection of 148�h Avenue SE and SE 124th Street. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 2ptn 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Publication Date: August 6, 2001 Account No. 51067 dnspub �` ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION SHAMROCK ANNEXATION LUA-01-084,A,R The applicant,Pacific Land Consulting,has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of this 66.16-acre annexation site from King County's R-4 Zone to Renton's R-5 Zone.The site is located approximately 600'north of NE 4`h Street and is bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE,if extended, on the east by 150`h Avenue SE,if extended,and on the north by SE 121$`Street,if extended. 148tn Avenue SE traverses the annexation site on a north/south axis. SE 124`h Street(NE 6`h Place)intersects 148`h Avenue SE on the east. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger in size. Location: The 66.16 acre site located to the west,north,east and south of the intersection of 148th Avenue SE and SE 124th Street THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 20�h, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-430-6510. �' Proposed Shamrock Annex,�,tion t ¢ � � s � w > L � 124th PI t L I h PI O- � � N h St h St z E 1 nd t 2n t � , E . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DE�(ELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. . � � City of Renton STAFF Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and REPORT Strategic Planning ENV/RONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE July 31, 2001 Project Name Shamrock Annexation R-5 Rezone Applicant Mark Holland, Pacific Land Consulting File Number LUA-01-084,A, R, ECF Project Manager pon Erickson Project Description The applicant, Pacific Land Consulting, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of this 66.16-acre annexation site from King County's R-4 Zone to Renton's R-5 Zone. The site is located approximately 600' north of NE 4th Street and is bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the east by 150tn Avenue SE, if extended, and on the north by SE 121 St Street, if extended. 148'n Avenue SE traverses the annexation site on a north/south axis. SE 124th Street (NE 6'h Place) intersects 148th Avenue SE on the east. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger in size. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21 C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's R-5 zoning the + 66 acre site could theoretically accommodate approximately 260 dwelling units, assuming 5 du/net acre. Because of steep slopes and a designated wetland within the rezone area the actual number of units allowed may be less than 260 units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Rural land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Project Location The 66.16 acre site located to the west, north, east and south of the intersection of 148th Avenue SE and SE 124th Street Exist. Bldg. Area gsf N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf N/A Site Area 66.16 acres Total Building Area gsf N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance for this non-project rezone. Project Location Map Backup ofercreportwbk CityofRenton EDNSPDepartment Environ• �2tal Review Conunittee StaffReport SHAMROCKANNEXATIONR-S REZONE � �r LUA-Ol-084,A,R,ECF REPORT AND DECIS/ON OF JULY 31 s',200/ Page2 of 3 B. RECOMMENDAT/ON Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERM/NAT/ON OF DETERM/NATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-S/GN/F/CANCE-MITIGATED. X Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. M/T/GATION MEASURES None proposed. Impacts from Renton's R-5 zoning are considered comparable to King County's R-4 zoning. This non-project legislative action should not result in changes of use or physical development that would not otherwise occur. Subsequent development at the project level is anticipated to go through environmental review unless otherwise SEPA exempt. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subjecf to fhe appeal process for environmental determinations. D. ENV/RONMENTAL /MPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following non-project environmental review addresses only those impacts that are not adequate/y addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Transportation Impacts: None identified for this non-project legislative action. Because Renton's R-5 zoning (5 du/net acre) is comparable to King County's R-4 zoning (4 du/gross acre) the number of vehicle trips that could be generated is assumed to be comparable. Generally, low density single-family detached residential is assumed to create + 10 Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends per dwelling unit. Mitigation Measures:At the time of a project action impacts, if any, can be better assessed and better addressed. Nexus: Not applicable. 2. Water Impacts: None identified for this non-project legislative action Mitigation Measures: At the time of a project action impacts, if any,can be better assessed and better addressed. Nexus: Not applicable. 3. Other Impacts: None identified for this non-project legislative action Mitigation Measures: At the time of a project action impacts, if any, can be better assessed and better addressed. Backup of ercreport.wbk Cit�+ofRenton EDNSPDepartment Environ �ntal Review Committee StaffReport SHAMROCK ANNEXATION R-S REZONE i�r � L UA-Ol-084,A,R,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JULY 31�T,1001 Page3 of 3 E. COMMENTS OF REV/EW/NG DEPARTMENTS The proposa/ has been circu/afed to City Departmental / Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicab/e, these commenfs have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Nofes fo Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Officia/File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 20 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Backup of ercreport.wbk . ` Proposec�Shamrock Anne�.,,,�tion 117 h t > Q � 0 0 � � � S w I > � � �- � , 124th PI � � �l � � � � � � I� � � i � � e e h PI ' N h St h St z E 1 nd t 2n St � SE 13 DEVELOPMEN�'FLANN6fVC; Proposed annexation boundary CITY OF��lTON --- - Existing corporate boundary �.�Y o�, EDNSP MAY 3 1 ��1 0 600 1,200 �.• Sue Cazlson,Administraror O.Dennison R EC EiVE D �] ��NT� 20Apri12001 1. /�200 Iuly 16, 2001 � Renton City Council Minutes � Page 232 CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Minutes of July 9, Approval of Council minutes of July 9, 2001. Council concur. 2001 Appeal: Montemayor Short City Clerk submitted appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding Plat, Mark DeWitt(SHP-01- Montemayor Short Plat(SHP-01-005) filed by Mark DeWitt; four single-family 005) lots on .59 acres located on northeast corner of Benson Rd. S. and SE 29th St. Refer to Plannin�&Development Committee. (See page 233 for related correspondence.) City Clerk: 2001 Renton City Clerk reported the official population for the City of Renton as of April 1, Population 2001,to be 51,140 as calculated by the State of Washington Office of Financial Management. Information. CAG: O1-093, Benson Rd S City Clerk reported bid opening on 07/11/2001 for CAG-01-093, Benson Rd. S. Pedestrian Improvements, RW Pedestrian Improvements project; five bids;project estimate$240,324.60; and Scott Const Co submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, R.W. Scott Construction Company, in the amount of$262,969. Council concur. CAG: 00-179, Senior Center Community Center Department submitted CAG-00-179, Senior Center Sun Sun Room Installation, Sound Room Installation project; and recommended approval of the project, and Glass authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of$56,210.91 to contractor, Sound Glass. Council concur. Human Services: 2002 CDBG Human Services Division recommended setting a public hearing on 08/13/2001 Funds Allocation on the allocation of the 2002 funding recommendations for General Fund and Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) funds. Refer to Communitv Services Committee; set public hearing for 08/13/2001. ��,p Annexation: Piele, 142nd Ave Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department ��' SE &NE 6th St recommended a public hearing be set on 08/06/2001 to consider the 60%Notice of Intent to Annex for the proposed Piele Annexation and proposed R-8 (Residential Single Family; eight dwelling units per acre)zoning; approximately 20 acres located east and west of 142nd Ave. SE(Hoquiam Ave. NE), south of NE 6th St. (if extended) and west of 144th Ave. SE(if e�ctended). Council concur. ��( Annexation: Shamrock,NE 4th Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department � St& 148th Ave SE recommended a public meeting be set on 08/06/2001 to consider the 10%Notice �\' of Intent to Annex for the proposed Shamrock Annexation; approximately 66.6 acres abutting the City boundary north of NE 4th St. and located east and west of 148th Ave. SE between 150th Ave. SE on the east and 144th Ave. SE, if extended, on the west. Council concur. Transportation: Passenger Transportation Systems Division requested briefing on proposed passenger ferry Ferry Service on Lake service over Lake Washington by Dutchman Marine dba La1ce Sprite. The ferry Washington, Dutchman Marine would dock at Southport and possibly Port Quendall, and would provide commuters living and working in Renton with an alternative means of transportation. Refer to Transportation Committee. Citizen Comment: Hawkins- At the request of Council, Correspondence was read from Dave Hawkins, 10636 Montemayor Short Plat Appeal SE 166th St., Renton, 98055, supporting the Hearing Examiner's decision to (SHP-01-005) grant his appeal of the Administrative Determination for the Montemayor Short Plat(item 6.b.); and challenging various points denoted in Mark DeWitt's appeal � :,/�' G-'.i- i�^': .:i � � RE��u�� JUL 3 20Q? ECONOMIC DEVE�pp��C�r NEIGHt30RHrjvp�, AND STRATEGi;`o��yN;�'� 10415 - 147th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 July 1, 2001 Don Erickson, AICP Development Services Division 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Shamrock Annexation and Issaquah School District Dear Mr. Erickson: � * �.. .. I would like to comment on this proposed annexation by the City of Renton. A portion of this annexation area is in the Issaquah School District. With previous Renton annexations and new Renton developments springing up out here like wild fire, Apollo Elementary, Maywood Middle and Liberty School are over capacity. In order to bring additional rooms to these already remodeled schools,the Issaquah School District will have to bring in portables. This is a direct result of the City of Renton's lack of concem as to what these developments are doing to this area's schools. Has a study been done to what the impact of this annexation will have on the schools of the area? What does the City of Renton intend to do to help the Issaquah School District with this problem, a problem that has been caused, in part, by Renton's huge appetite for more developments? Thank you for answering my questions. Sincerely, �-��4��... ��.;-,�n.� Claudia Donnelly � cc: Issaquah School Board Renton City Council � � �/.�,��,f.,.. " ✓I`.:�..":;� , �+r ''�y' Annexation Review Form - Shamrock Annexation z � �0 � � �nO c (X) 10% Notice of Intent ( ) 60%Annexation Petition m�o � � o � �;_< „�. TO ; Building Surtace Water Utility vOo �v � Fire Water Utility z�m o Parks Wastewater Utility � � � Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Don Erickson, AICP / Senior Planner Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning SUBJECT : Proposed Shamrock Annexation Location : Generally north and west of the existing city limits north of NE 4'h Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 1501h Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. Date Circulated; 5/31/O1 Comments Due: b/14/Ol General Information � Area : 66.6 acres ,� �� Street length . 0 �� '9L � Assessed Value ; $6,829,000 ?'G o 1 /G Estimated Population . 65 y � � Current Uses ��F�A �p o � O Residential . ±20 dwellings, majority of area vacant 9 0 Commercial ; N/A c�� Industrial : N/A s Public : Streets only. Comp Plan : Resource Conservation Designation Future Uses: : Single family Future Po ulation � Est. 480 ersons 260 homes �� Reviewing Department/Division: ' 1u�4 - �C�i'l� 1, Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? r ` ��'�I�-�� l�� a�i� fZ�Gt/i�7� <�'J i�I, S G�iZ-�'cc-_, 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? �,� �bv� , (Over) , � � 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? � 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the C' w Id incur as a esult of this annexation? � .c�Sif'i�'� �-'� ��'��a��` Gy.f�-�/�/�'r�--z�.-:-�-- � C�' � fG�G Y? /Y�7�� - YY��I�?-�47Gt'`'�� G��_ �c,�� . ��-�� S �1��' .� �2��.� ��-�.. ^��5� c�'vZCm c-c-?� �r�'7�� 'f� i � �` �/� �'�J �-�� v,l 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilitie� currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of t ' annexation? �G��YJh,. � d`f�'-� v- �&�� /G� �D�'��-� C�2,�.._.. �, � � � �,.�oC' �j�'�- G'r�1�7 rU 7 _ ,`(Jy'1�'f ic-��-- , �L-c-�.,' I` l�l�Gl��I` f�/J �"�I�I��(`,�' G��J /` �� , Sf� �� /� � � � �-� -�� b. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City � services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �/� General recommendation and comments: �1-� d�2.� G"�o� Sf'1�°�l� c� �c��/� -��`` `� �� ?/S G'T i-C��.- , Signature: '� G��e; 6 �"' �rr+' Shamrock Annexation The City has received a 10% Notice of Intent for Annexation Petition for the proposed Shamrock Annexation, a 66.16 acre area located approximately 600' north of NE 4th Street and bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the east by 150 Avenue SE, if extended, and on the north by SE 1215`Street, if extended. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger. The proposed zoning for this annexation is the R-5 Zone, allowing up to 5 du/units per net acre. The 66.16-acre site could theoretically accommodate approximately 260 dwelling units. - � Proposec�, Shamrock Annex�tion 117 h t > Q � 0 0 � � � S w > � � �t- � . ` \ 124th PI � � _� -- � � , r— � � I� � � � Qe o h PI N h Ist h St z E 1 nd t 2n St � SE 13 Proposed annexation boundary ———— Existing corporate boundary ��Y o�, EDNSP O 6OO l,GOO �.• Sue Carlson,Administrator O.Dennison �7 ��NT� 20Apri12001 �. /��OO . • '+"✓ ',�,,' SHAMROCK ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter and the North half(1/2) of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the South half(1/2) of the North half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10, EXCEPT the North 132 feet thereof; AND the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, of Section 11, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,King County, ' Washington. l: ;., '� � ��v. .. f��:+ . . , /��;.f` , , � '�rIY� �� Annexation Review Form - Shamrock Annex tionN 7 2 2�01 ECONOMIC DEVELpph,!ENT, NEIGNBORHOpDS, (X) 10% Notice of intent Ar� sTRArc�ic o ( ) 60%Annexation �A�1N�NU TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Don Erickson, AICP /Senior Planner Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Shamrock Annexation Location : Generally north and west of the existing city limits norfh of NE 41h Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 150'h Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. Date Circulated: 5/31/O1 Comments Due: b/14/O1 General Information Area ; 66.6 acres Street length : 0 Assessed Value : $6,829,000 Estimated Population . 65 Current Uses Residential ; ±20 dwellings, majority of area vacant Commercial : N/A industrial ; N/A Public : Streets only. Comp Plan ; Resource Conservation Designation Future Uses: : Single family Future Po ulation � Est. 480 ersons 260 homes Reviewing Department/Division: 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? ..�y� /�0 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? -��. .. . .�z�� ' �� . (Over) �1rr+` �ri+' . 3, Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you ide tify any other costs the ity would incur as a result of this annexation? � �� ..�' " -.�--�- �--�-�-�-� . ��- � . o�- ,, �� -e �� .�� -t- � . �� '� , 5. Would the ty assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? - ��,,,�'�,Q �Q�� 2��?a`, 1 � -,��'� u�� a �� 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) ��w General recommendation and comments: 1 Signat Date: S �S � � � • \'n'` '�' Shamrock Annexation The City has received a 10% Notice of Intent for Annexation Petition for the proposed Shamrock Annexation, a 66.16 acre area located approximately 600' north of NE 4t1i Street and bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the east by 150 Avenue SE, if extended, and on the north by SE 1215`Street, if extended. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger. The proposed zoning for this annexation is the R-5 Zone, allowing up to 5 du/units per net acre. The 66.16-acre site could theoretically accommodate approximately 260 dwelling units. . , � � SHAMROCK ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter and the North half(1/2) of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the South half(1/2) of the North half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10, EXCEPT the North 132 feet thereof; AND the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, of Section 11,Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,King County, ' Washington. ' � � Proposec�Shamrock Anne�„�,,tion 117 h t > Q 0 � 0 � � � S w > � � d- � � 124th PI � � �l � � � � � � �-�-� -�-� � � h PI � �� N h St h St z E 1 nd t 2n St � SE 13 Proposed annexation boundary — —— — Existing corporate boundary v��Y �„n EDNSP � 6�� 1�2�0 �.* Sue Carison,Administraror O.Dennison �'] ��NT� 20Apri12001 �. /��OO ., . . ��.a�.�� Annexation Review Form - Shamrock Annexation (X) 10% Notice of Intent ( ) 60%Annexation Petition TO ; Buiiding Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Don Erickson, AICP / Senior Planner Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT : Proposed Shamrock Annexation Location : Generally north and west of the existing city limits north of NE 4'h Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 150'h Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. Date Circulated; 5/31/Ol Comments Due: 6/14/Ol General Information �^'° V��F..:��4."ti9� Area : 66.6 acres �:�°�� ---< Street length : 0 Assessed Value : $6,829,000 "�'�'} `�'� �� Estimated Population : 65 Current Uses ��- sr'�� E�d`� Residential : ± 20 dwellings, majority of area vacant Commercial ; N/A Industrial : N/A Public : Streets only, Comp Plan : Resource Conservation Designation Future Uses: : Single family Future Po ulation � Est. 480 ersons 260 homes Reviewing Department/Division: i��di�/c�- 1, Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? ��,�� 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? /y� (Over) „ � , � � 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? ycs 4, What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �� 5, Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �� General recommendation and comments; � ., � Signature; 2 � Date: �r�� C11 � � Shamrock Annexation The City has received a 10°Io Notice of Intent for Annexation Petition for the proposed Shamrock Annexation, a 66.16 acre area located approximately 600' north of NE 4tn Street and bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the east by 150 Avenue SE, if extended, and on the north by SE 1215` Street, if extended. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger. The proposed zoning for this annexation is the R-5 Zone, allowing up to 5 du/units per net acre. The 66.16-acre site could theoretically accommodate approximately 260 dwelling units. ' " � Proposec;�,, Shamrock Anne� , tion � � -- , � �� _ - I �� i -�- �� 117 h t i ---1 ,�' � _ , � - -� � -- --1 --�- - -- _ j � � - --- _ Q � — - � �'__ —�_� ; � -- - o -�----- � - -----, � i _ , r- ___ _-__T-__ -_L__ - _--___-- T__ -- _1-.__--'-"--_ � - S - --T - �� - - - -- - w ; , �- � _� I i ' �- I�— ' ------- —T-L--�--- -----�--! -L -� � , -- � - -- � �-- ] ------- � --r---�---- — --- --� � �T� 't_ ---� --------L �- ---_� ,� � __ _�, -- - _--- --;--- � -; _ -- ' - ----�� -- 124th - ' f� ' PI ! � � � � I� � - ------ ,,_= L,- �� --1 ; ' �-_ _ - -_{�- - - ,1=� --T _ - -i __ i --�- _�-- -----T-- —_ a� a, _ � �- �-_— `r --�r 'I-- _ — � -�- � � ' �L-J , - � � - , - � - I � �--' -�--� _� , i , � �I' � � - li - 'i � � ', �J� Ih PI �� F- O � ' -- __ -� ' �-� ��_� � � ;- - I -- � r - � k�- � � - - � , N �4 h St r � - - i I N� h St � � ; � I ' � _ � i I' . � � � � � I—.� z � ! i I , - '-- ' ' -�- i I i � il � 1__L-� - _ -�-- -- --- i � I - �� '� �-,-T-T- r �� ------ I I -- — � � � I ----- -- L � �-- � -- -�_-L-� - _ -� - j___ ----- -- - -,- ,---�- --i --j �_ -- �' E; 1 nd t 2n St � I � SE 13 Proposed annexation boundary — — — — Existing corporate boundary �.�Y o.�, EDNSP O 6OO 1,200 �� Sue Carlson,Administra[or ,P�+�%$ O.Dennison �] FN.{O 20Apri12001 1. /�200 � � SHAMROCK ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter and the North half(1/2) of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the South half(1/2) of the North half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10, EXCEPT the North 132 feet thereof; AND the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, of Section 11, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington. )))J �p > � � � Annexation Review Form - Shamrock Annexation (X) 10% Notice of Intent ( ) 60%Annexation Petition TO ; Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Don Erickson, AICP / Senior Planner Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning SUBJECT : Proposed Shamrock Annexation Location : Generally north and west of the existing city limits north of NE 4'h Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 150'h Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. Date Circulated: 5/31/Ol Comments Due: 6/14/Ol General Information Area : 66.6 acres Street length : 0 Assessed Value ; S6,829,000 Estimated Population . 65 Current Uses Residential : ±20 dwellings, majority of area vacant Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : Streets only. Comp Plan : Resource Conservation Designation Future Uses: : Single family Future Po ulation • Est. 480 ersons 260 homes Reviewing Department/Division: �iR� J��: 1, Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? Na 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? �91 D (Over) .� . "�rr+ ,�„ 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? �E� 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? Ncrv� 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for fcacilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? N L� 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �� General recommendation and comments: Signature: � �'`' Date; � '//l L' � �, � . . � � Shamrock Annexation The City has received a 10% Notice of Intent for Annexation Petition for the proposed Shamrock Annexation, a 66.16 acre area located approximately 600' north of NE 4th Street and bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the east by 150 Avenue SE, if extended, and on the north by SE 1215`Street, if extended. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger. The proposed zoning for this annexation is the R-5 Zone, allowing up to 5 dulunits per net acre. The 66.16-acre site could theoretically accommodate approximately 260 dwelling units. � . . � � SHAMROCK ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter and the North half(1/2) of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the South half(1/2) of the North half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10, EXCEPT the North 132 feet thereof; AND the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, of Section 1 l, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,King County, ' Washington. . /�j�- �, ,F- j.� f i'`�'or " �, (� , �'�. r 1.r; . , � Annexation Review Form - Shamrock Annexation (X) 10% Notice of Intent ( ) 60%Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Don Erickson, AICP/ Senior Planner Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT : Proposed Shamrock Annexation Location : Generally north and west of the existing city limits north of NE 4'h Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 150'"Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. Date Circulated; 5/31/Ol Comments Due; 6/14/Ol General Information � Area ; 66,6 acres ��,��'V�� Street length . o MAY Assessed Value : $6,829,000 '� ' 2oQ� Estimated Population : 65 v`T�OF��NT Current Uses sysp�ont Residential : ±20 dwellings, majority of area vacant Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : Streets only. Comp Plan : Resource Conservation Designation Future Uses: ; Single family Future Po ulation � Est. 480 ersons 260 homes Reviewing Department/Division: ��"'�F-GA-T-�� V�i t�►T� l. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? � �s %�� 65 C.1/Q/�'�Tvf G�f�f,r,l lE��:/,L7?h�� G�7�-y��f;2�/!� >' �`9�� /�;� f�1 o-��i �a�l��2�'i,�✓`la•c/ ��c-�d��T"f��iG��, 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? � �� G ��,�� ✓° �� =�� T.�� ,�� - y ,I6�2avG� .�,��os�� i;��.s �� o� �T3'��2�._,d ljG��02 �6�� (Over) � � 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical e�ension of services provided by your department/division? ��/ �l�5�.�/L�� 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? Co`°��TiorfiAc_ c�.��G�/�,�E�'Qvi��? ��'�2��15�a,�S ' �, ��cJ�/�d / �i1oV�,� �UCd�_ j', 5, Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? �j l(`�, �� J��`c� /;��li�,Ei2 ✓o �,S ��-. b. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �_ General recommendation and comments: . .lt��,5-�� .��r,� �_. r" Si nature: � Date: � G �rr►' .,� Shamrock Annexation The City has received a 10% Notice of Intent for Annexation Petition for the proposed Shamrock Annexation, a 66.16 acre area located approximately 600' north of NE 4`i' Street and bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the east by 150 Avenue SE, if extended, and on the north by SE 1215`Street, if extended. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger. The proposed zoning for this annexation is the R-5 Zone, allowing up to 5 du/units per net acre. The 66.16-acre site could theoretically accommodate approximately 260 dwelling units. � Propose�,, Shamrock Anne:�tion 117 h t > Q 0 � 0 � � � S w > � � d- � \ , 124th PI � � � � a� a� � � �� i � Do e � � � h PI N h St h St z E 1 nd t 2n St � SE 13 Proposed annexation boundary — ——— Existing corporate boundary ��Y o� EDNSP O 6OO l,GOO y.` Sue Cadson,Administrator O.Dennison �J ��N?� ZOApri12001 �. /��OO � � SHAMROCK ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter and the North half(1/2) of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the South half(1/2) of the North half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10, EXCEPT the North 132 feet thereof; AND the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, of Section 1 l, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,King County, ' Washington. ` ��`'�-� G'�� J� . � �� -'��'� RE��`�'�}�� CITY OF RENTON JUN 1 � 2001 � PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS ��:,,�;_ „ MEMORANDUM �'� `" ��,�r�_.::;w,- a --.�°�.��.. .� ., ...:.._. DATE: June 12,2001 TO: Don Erickson, EDNS� FROM: Ron Straka, Surface Water UtilityG' �� SUBJECT: Proposed Shamrock Annexation In response to your request for review of the subject annexation petition area, concerning Surface Water Issues specifically, we present the following: • Question l. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your division? '1'i There are no known drainage problems within this propos�d annexation area. Tlle area is i within two drainage basins (Cedar and May Creek) that liave been identified as having ,� significant erosion, water quality, and habitat problems due to urbanization. Future � development should be conditioned through SEPA to meet tl�e 1998 King County Surface �� Water Design Manual until the City updates our current code for drainage standards to be ';, equivalent. This area is currently mostly undeveloped. Therefore, a large percentage of the area is pervious surface. As the area develops, the addition of more impervious areas will increase surface water runoff, which will affect downstream hydrology, water quality and fish habitat. Storm Systems to control and convey runoff will need to be constructed to manage ' the increase in runof£ In particular, the existing roadways will probably need new storm ,��drainage systems installed. Although developers �nay be required to install some storm � �drainage improvements along the frontage of their development, there are areas tl�at may � ,need to be improved with City of Renton funds. This may represent a fiscal impact to the ;;�city. • Question 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? There are no known drainage problems in the area. The area generally consists of ditches to convey runoff for streets and lacks improved piped storm system typically used to convey l�' runoff from streets in urban areas. There is a 26-lot subdivision that was recorded prior to '' 1960. The drainage standards applied to the subdivision in this area were not to our current ,j standards. Approximately half of the platted lots are developed with single-family homes. '', When the remaining lots develop, they will contribute additional runoff that will not be fully �;'�mitigated through the application of current storm standards. This may present a problem for the existing local storm drainage systems, since it may not have been designed to accommodate the runoff for the established land use designation for the area. The existing storm systems in the area may need to be upgraded as the area develops. 6/12/2001 "'"•"" "w� Page 2 of 2 • Question 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your division? Yes, the proposed annexation area is within the drainage basin areas that are currently served by the City of Renton. • Question 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? At a minimum, staffing levels would need to expand in proportion to the additional area that the utility is responsible for serving, especially as the area develops and there is more public infrastructure to maintain and operate. Because the infrastructure may not currently meet City of Renton standard, the immediate staff resources necessary for this newly annexed area may be greater initially. It is assumed that it would gradually return to a level that is commensurate with the rest of the city. � Question 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? The City would assume the responsibility for the existing storm drainage systems associated with road right of way. It is not know whether the City would assume any detention ponds �!,`within this area. There are no known agreements or franchises for the storm water systems `�;Lwithin this area. • Question 6. Would alternative boundaries create a more logical annexation for provisiov of City services? As stated before, this area bisects two drainage basins (Cedar and May Creek). It may be easier to develop regional drainage solutions and plans if we were the service providers far a , �� larger portion of the contributing basin area. For this proposed area, the area between the`\ � � 1 nd f 'i� `� i�� ,�, western boundary and 142 Ave SE is part of the subbasin that would contribute runoff to the -, ��. � i � ';I downstream s stem. Therefore, it ma be a benefit to be the service rovider for this area as "' ` ` �� ,r � Y Y p ;`well. 1 r� : l� ��'�.'. / � " General recommendations and comments: �` � cc: Mike Dotson Ron Shaffer John Thompson H:\DIVISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS�2001�2001-334.doc\RJS\tb � • `'"'rr wr� Annexation Review Form - Shamrock Annexation (X) 10% Notice of Intent ( ) 60%Annexation Petition TO . Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Don Erickson, AICP /Senior Planner Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning SUBJECT : Proposed Shamrock Annexation Location . Generally north and west of the existing city limits north of NE 4"'Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 150'h Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. Date Circulated: 5/31/Ol Comments Due: 6/14/O1 General Information Area : 66.6 acres RE�EIVE[� street�ength � � �IAY 3 1 2001 Assessed Value : $6,829,000 Estimated Population : 65 CITY OF RENTON Current Uses 11TiLITY SYSTEMS Residential : ±20 dwellings, majority of area vacant Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : Streets only. Comp Plan : Resource Conservation Designation Future Uses: : Single family Future Po ulation Est. 480 ersons 260 homes Reviewing Department/Division: ��?,��. 1��- C�"��li l. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �� r.2�3'`�c`�-� /�'�i2w 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? , �� Gy't��"k/ `)i.� �v (Over) � ' �'""'' ",✓P 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? �j�.s- lz�'ts:!/Y .' ��"hC'G 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? rj� �i b�-ac.�Cc c� /y+�-.,,��j 5. Wouid the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? �� c�l�.c�,� .��1.��c�+ 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) ��G �'4�'r-C �-�+� s�c'-,'1�u General recommendation and comments: P �!� ,� 'f � / Signature: �� Date: �l �� o � � , "��✓ r.r,' Shamrock Annexation The City has received a 10% Notice of Intent for Annexation Petition for the proposed Shamrock Annexation, a 66.16 acre area located approximately 600' north of NE 4t1' Street and bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the east by 150 Avenue SE, if extended, and on the north by SE 1215`Street, if extended. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger. The proposed zoning for this annexation is the R-5 Zone, allowing up to 5 du/units per net acre. The 66.16-acre site could theoretically accommodate approximately 260 dwelling units. i • � � - . Propose�;,., Shamrock Anne�tion 117 h t > Q � 0 0 � � � ex�„��' 1�.r�.-!-✓' S w > � � d- � 124th PI � � a °-' °-' , � � � I� � � h PI � � � � � N h St h St z E 1 nd t 2n St � SE 13 Proposed annexation boundary I — —— — Existing corporate boundary 0 600 1,200 ti�Y o EDNSP �O� S�Carlson.Administrator O.Dennison �7 ��NT� 20Apri12001 1. /�200 � Y . ' • s , ' � �� SHAMROCK ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South half(1/2)of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter and the North half(1/2) of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the South half(1/2) of the North half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10, EXCEPT the North 132 feet thereof; AND the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, of Section 11,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M.,King County, ' Washington. ' _ 1��`]�C� „�.+'� . !/ y ''r�•.,i�'1. ,-'t v(. • a hl�� Annexation Review Form - Shamrock Annexation (X) 10°� Notice of Intent ( ) 60°�Annexation Pefiition TO . Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation , Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM . Don Erickson, AICP/Senior Planner - Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Shamrock Annexation Location . Generally north and west of the existing city limits north of NE 4"'Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 150"'Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. Date Circulated: 5/31/O1 Comments Due: 6/14/O1 General Information Area . bb.b acres Street length ; � . Assessed Value : $6,829,0� Estimated Population . 65 Current Uses Residential . ±20 dwellings, majority of area vacanfi Commercial . N/A industrial : N/A Public . Streets only. Comp Pian : Resource Conservation Designation Future Uses: . Single family Future Po ulation : Est. 480 ersons 260 homes Reviewing Department/Division: �a ks�r .�ib a �rs'f"e�s D�v� 5 ra h 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your deparfment/division? yes, Recch�' {G J C.�w�y devc(or�ce,4�'1►�•ross�s �r �'lt�s BHM�,C��i'ok a�ea da Kc �Nc(kc(e -�-Inc Cx�rMStoK o� S� 124* Sfrec� �ivE G+� 51ti►ccfr►. ReN�aK�wes� e� /4-sl+th�e�ke SE. T7��s s�rt� cac�h:coN rs �K �w� o�fs�f Se weN�l" �h es��bl�:�i�k NE L� S�'af as oM ess4�/w�st Neyk�. ,.d co f�t��ov fik a1�rN�u+e � 43C4� St,�} `fs�w�� +� �� !• � �as�'bey.w,l Re 's c.��r•,W�►t u 1��►�fs. It�s h ►c�Pj f+t�� f,�'� P�•�` ed NN xs oM,s .k�d�.�_f h8rpeh te�rtl 2. e�r�you �i�'vare� �j�~�'r`��def�ci�nc�i�s i��ex sfing�infra��r�i ��Wce � provision to the area? -_ I YeS� Cu� aKd�u� ��cic�a�ks,�h�d �rcG� ��►�� ia'� ��c�' G� o�I�'� S'1'?�J.'Ivt�S 8hC �'�ol►�,�eG or Jo Ko'f' t�s,v�ca,�y t1C�$�!' 6k ex�s�i� s�'e�TS W Pr�pos�� a Ner�+tok avc�, i41so� ex�s��K� �av��„c�.f w�d�t, s�d��N�ss � Not w�eG} R�h�n s�a.ds, P `� �.11► ( /�d E (Over) �' Tra►�s ,rfa'�toK S a�rw� Di�+s�oN s�� tde«.t�f:� N �.Ec� Sfr�G as �e _ - � � '_ Vhos"'�" reJc �t ' 1t� v�a b/e GoVi�IC�of► � �t�d��k �� CaiT/Wcl� Gp� c�i _r,�s�work o�s�e�F�s scrvr Nor�t,t�^a�s� �ew�K s�dit�.e Sv�a eas�o1� _ �GN�K GKv1�cv�'� GI� �1w�1"� Tr1tYC�toYG� ,eK�cNSiON � SEI24'f'(� .S'I12e.T CNE�IfI _ �'�cc�,�tucs� o-�/4d}� �4vcKK��'� �f�►rou h f�e. pro p�sIeaC .aK�cxa�ze� Zl.c'd� � as ��I a a�Y o�t'�� „ew �H�rhal' �• w�s� e/�t�r �abl�c a�.pvlva�ie� w ��►►�� c rr��,&d ac�erdik 1is Re�k G� G•dc � �.rv�,�,�,�f'r � oF - s�ar�d��d�s• ,�' '�1' y � -ex��cr��ro�N''�a-� S%�4� S�Ct a�dy�c v�n�t a f h�ad�� S �f�.�w �ic ��.�a o� aKntxzf�ok �s�� s vbf e�,��enfty -�n�� br t w�i o��QeK,f�k�d J,7�tve�'i►e ---t�o�,�d.-�t ��-,-�i,� e.+c p t�s e a-�'�uw �e v e(o p w�.t.+1.� c r r�v a f r p vo p t�► o w n e r S. 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? y�5 . 4, What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a resuit of this annexation? /�dd��oha.l -waks�pr�-a`Ete� s�a'T� wo4tl� Y.t-o��"c b� {�drk�YEA T� s�vv+C' �+e pvo�oseel aKu►e+ts-�'toK airta. As�we+�e.0 �'ke e•t�r�.siow. o�^ 5� I't4�i ,S}��- �iuE �it�s�'c�a.-"'f, '�• �w`",�'r' � l4��f�.a�c�ke s�.(as d�sc�sss�d a.bo��awd o��r �Gw ��+e�kal �oaelways i,vaw ld 6 e - ��:.�;1 }� s�wve �e proposed B.Kkticz"�iow� a,V�C.� . TJ�ett rosd'wars aKd Zwy kpJrad�N' �� e�tst�K� �o��R�,aays we��{ b� a+ �i.e e�c+►tt o� new develv�en+eM f o►• �O��v��k �ororev�hy ot�►+s, ��t1� q1KK�,�a�oK� M ai�fiNak��. c�F -f�^aKspo�f;s�"�h -at��c,sr �h�lk�✓i�► s�►,�'��. . uvb�d�u�e�rs� s�d�walks� �3vewcG+�f�w►�arltr�s, ��H�,akd �f,rGT ��'F/k� OYN "�JCI��r+, ak�,�er'�r. s��s �ouEd bc .�Nd�d akd �c�ot+rpl�s�td by �c ��y e��?e�.f��„ �K�r�� s�s �ss �d�ed wt�f'l� pro(/�d►� S�eGt �Jk��n�v�or �X�s�-�� ak.d Ke� S�ee-�f lMmy a�S�' , b� �Kde� by �c �,{�, '�ktfG �-/ka►K fsKakce. a l r,� Ghc�y cos�{^t 5�v u.l�� b�G �* d �`tN��n��1� �kV�tN, ��T�►e 6u►.�h a-� Ved�G�weY m8�k.�th��c GaS�f 5�toklc� E!� Y/G�"tKt'?�.!e� w�� .�-ke Ma�wftha�r�r Dtv�S�oh .) / 5. Would the City assume ownership or responslbility for facillties currently owned or _ managed by another jurisdiction? Would new a�reements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? �/es, -l�c�.e C�-4,j wo�ld �ssu�� owwe�sC��P pv yeJ�OKSl6�� -��V po�fioas of /�8�/�+�w�e� s� ��'h �+� 149f� �Kut S�t akd �,sa� �.� SE w�� -�e pr�,000s«( awHexa�x� arc� +ka-�- arc «vrc„+��, r�ZnB�y�d `y k�K� C�•�K-fy4 I�lo hEW � vre'�xe�w�`s wo�td bs ►-�e�w�r�d as a ��skl�" o�F'�l�s anhera-��ok, b. Would alter�ate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (if yes, please indicate on the attached map.) /Yo. , General recommendation and comments: � Tt�.� Tr'a�spor-f'a�-rA� Sys-�erKs �i v�s�oh S�PP��-�s -�,e pv•�Ooscc� a�nKeKa-�'to�� e5�q!urallr � ��' will eNHBwce �e °PPor�e�� `b ex�Kd 5� t2q-ft,. �-f�cf �iV� �t ��GT�, � �� we,s+ o� I49�'L, /hi�wuc s�. Signature: �' � f � Date: � �i�� _ � � � " ' �' �ro` Shamrock Annexation The City has received a 10°Io Notice of Intent for Annexation Petition for the proposed Shamrock Annexation, a 66.16 acre area located approximately 600' north of NE 4`� Street and bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE,if extended, on the east by 150 Avenue SE, if extended, and on the north by SE 1215`Street, if extended. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger. The proposed zoning for this annexation is the R-5 Zone, allowing up to 5 du/units per net acre. The 66.16-acre site could theoretically accommodate approximately 260 dwelling units. ` . . Proposed�Shamrock Annex tion 117 h t > Q � 0 � � �- S . w > � � �t- 124th PI � � � -� -� i � � � h PI Qe e N h St h St z E 1 nd t 2n St � SE 13 Proposed annexation boundary ——— — Existing corporate boundary 0 600 1,200 �'� o EDNSP �O• Sue Car�son.Administrator O.Dennison �/ r� FN.�O 20Apri12001 �. /�GOO • ' ' `r"' .,�` SHAMROCK ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter and the North half(1/2)of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the South half(1/2)of the North half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10,EXCEPT the North 132 feet thereof; AND the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, of Section 11,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,King County, " Washington. ��=;�> r��l/1'�' _ l y�,� � � Annexation Review Form - Shamrock Annexation (X) 10% Notice of Intent ( ) 60%Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Don Erickson, AICP /Senior Planner Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT : Proposed Shamrock Annexation Location : Generally north and west of the existing city limits norfh of NE 4m Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 150'h Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. Date Circulated: 5/31/O1 Comments Due: b/14/O1 General Information e Area : 66.6 acres �'��1 v� . Street length . 0 MAY Assessed Value : S6,829,000 C�T 3 � 2��,' Estimated Population : 65 Current Uses Ur��!�SqFF'Mc�na Residential , ±20 dwellings, majority of area vacant Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : Streets only. Comp Plan : Resource Conservation Designation Future Uses: : Single family Future Po ulation • Est. 480 ersons 260 homes Reviewing Department/Division; d�,P�✓ �h�i ��( �y�{i��c,ri n�� 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? ' l lb • 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? ,1� �(�(2G. t S VJ1�`�n � �1�►G�ti✓ �e�l�Il t9- a�e� �Vtf( ��"f i C�I� � �U. � � � CQrlr�CAY� u� U�dNP� aJa.��a�mLl� (�i�u tioc. ►�e��,i�/c�f, .�rS'� �b a/rY �Q�l��o'��ne�1�• (Over) . � � 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? � i 1S�Y a��i cat,�,t �. a�Y1 t�. a,�(e a �' �S w��a� (11 alr�,/ C�i�r�l' `I d s �'�'a✓ C�i(vic9-- c�r/ca. 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? N dY o.�'g�% cai.�. � ��Yc.! �J�,�►�;�-�( . 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? G�1 a,�1� 11�.D � q� d9t� c�.v�ran� 1�c�J 1u�n �,,,, q —�ra�,d�;a�. a��e►�P� . � - y . � �. �;S�r��V � o �ua�'Q c� �^na�hlz�.�� '� wal�,,/ s�s �w. w;'►�h G,� l�w�s -r �bi�►-s- �_ wQ-�� . b. Wou d alternate boundarie create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) 'VO • General recommendation and comments: \ ,I �.ltl��k�f �1 S�1 !�/ �°��1 �C� -� ►laJ c� G� gj G r c�a-�- G� ��1�1cv�W��` �'' J � � 1 ; �.t. ` ' G� S6cm Ct� �o� — Signature: �nbu� CJ��`�►� Date: �u"�� ► �U� • . • 'rrr' � Shamrock Annexation The City has received a 10% Notice of Intent for Annexation Petition for the proposed Shamrock Annexation, a 66.16 acre area located approximately 600' north of NE 4`�' Street and bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the east by 150 Avenue SE, if extended, and on the north by SE 1215`Street, if extended. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger. The proposed zoning for this annexation is the R-5 Zone, allowing up to 5 du/units per net acre. The 66.16-acre site could theoretically accommodate approximately 260 dwelling units. - � Proposec�..Shamrock Annex,.,tion 117 h t > Q � 0 0 � � � s w > � � � � 124th PI � � � � �; � � � I� � � h PI � o e � N h �St h St z � E 1 nd t 2n St � SE 13 Proposed annexation boundary — —— — Existing corporate boundary 0 600 1,200 �ti'�Y o,�, EDNSP � � � Sue Carison,Administraror r�� O.Dennison �/ ��NT�� 20Apri12001 �. /��OO , . , . ,�r '�r� SHAMROCK ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter and the North half(1/2) of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, of Section 10,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the South half(1/2) of the North half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10,EXCEPT the North 132 feet thereof; AND the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, of Section 11, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,King County, ' Washington. d � ^ +; � � �, C�`� ��X1C�.l��l,�X.7►� Annexation Review Form - Shamrock Annexation �. _ (X) 10% Notice of Intent ( ) 60%Annexation Petition � TO . Building Surtace Water '' � Fire Water Utility R � �� Parks Wastewater U ility Police Transportatio JUL 1 0 2001 Public Works Maintenance Current Plann• gECONOMIC DEVELOPPPENT, NFIGHBUPHOODS, �, 4h1D STw",TEG:C PLANNWG FROM : Don Erickson, AICP /Senior Planner -� Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Shamrock Annexation Location : Generaliy north and west of the existing city limits north of NE 4m Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 150"'Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. Date Circulated: 5/31/Ol Comments Due: 6/14/O1 General Information Area . 66.6 acres Street length : 0 Assessed Value : $6,829,000 Estimated Population . 65 Current Uses Residential : ±20 dweilings, majority of area vacant Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public . Streets only. Comp Plan : Resource Conservation Designation Future Uses: : Single family Future Po ulation Est. 480 ersons 260 homes Reviewing Department/Division: l. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? 2. Are you aware of any probiems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? (Over) . . '�rr" '�r►'" 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? 4. What additionai facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currentiy owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (if yes, please indicate on the attached map.) Generai recommendation and comments: � �� ►�,C, �.�,�a C� � Signature:� �n � �(� Date: �"�� . . °�rr+` '�r� Shamrock Annexation The City has received a 10% Notice of Intent for Annexation Petition for the proposed Shamrock Annexation, a 66.16 acre area located approximately 600' north of NE 4`� Street and bounded on the west by 7ericho Avenue NE,if extended, on the east by 150 Avenue SE,if extended, and on the north by SE 1215` Street, if extended. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger. The proposed zoning for this annexation is the R-5 Zone, allowing up to 5 du/units per net acre. The 66.16-acre site could theoretically accommodate approximately 260 dwelling units. t . � Proposec� Shamrock Anne�tion 117 h t > Q � 0 0 � � � s w > � � � � 124th PI � � � � � � � I� � � h PI � o e N h St h St z E 1 nd t 2n St � SE 13 Proposed annexation boundary ——— — Existing corporate boundary 0 600 1,200 Uti�Y 0 EDNSP lsa� + � * Sue Carison,Administrator �� r�� O.Dennison �NTO 20Apri12001 1.7�200 . . . '�✓` `��+' SHAMROCK ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South half(1/2)of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter and the North half(1/2) of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, of Section 10, Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M.,King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the South half(1/2)of the North half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10, EXCEPT the North 132 feet thereof; AND the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, of Section 11,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,King County, ' Washington. �"F�� .� . � � � /� r� Annexation Review Form - Shamrock Annexation (X) 10°� Notice of intent ( ) 60%Annexation Petition TO . Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Don Erickson, AiCP/Senior Planner Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Shamrock Annexation Location : Generally norfh and west of the existing city limits north of NE 4'"Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 150m Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. Date Circulated: 5/31/Ol Comments Due: 6 14 Ol General information Area . 66.6 acres Street length : 0 � Assessed Value : $6,829,000 Estimated Population . 65 Current Uses Residential . ±20 dwellings, majority of area vacant Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public . Streets only. Comp Plan : Resource Conservation Designation Future Uses: : Single family Future Po ulation Est. 480 ersons 260 homes Reviewing Department/Division: l. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? (Over) , �+ +rrr�' 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) General recommendation and comments: � �lV�-�;�n�,�- �.�v�,,�a C� - Signature:� �n.��lA� Date: �"�� Shamrock Annexation The City has received a 10% Notice of Intent for Annexation Petition for the proposed Shamrock Annexation, a 66.16 acre area located approximately 600' north of NE 4`� Street and bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE,if extended, on the east by 150 Avenue SE,if extended, and on the north by SE 1215`Street, if extended. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger. The proposed zoning for this annexation is the R-5 Zone, � allowing up to 5 du/units per net acre. The 66.16-acre site could theoretically ' accommodate approximately 260 dwelling units. �" 1`�Y � 4 �A��',� !7!� 4 '�� 'N'r0 NOTICE OF APPLICATION , A Mastu AppNution hes bean}ikd end aueptad with the Davelopment Serviees Divlcion of ihe Ciry of penton. The followinp brlefly tlescribes Ihe appliption antl Ihe necossary Publie Approvals PROJECT NUMBERINAME: WA-01-084,A,R/SHAMROCK ANNEXATION AND REZONE PHOJECT DESCRIpTION: The CNy ot qenton has recelved a 10%Notice of Intent for Mnexation Petition for the proposed Shamrock Annexatlon,a 66.18 acre area bcated eppro�drnatey 600 feet north of NE 4"Street end bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE,tl extended,on the east by 150"qvenue SE,fl exlentleU,and on the rwrth by SE 727" SVeet,K ext�ded. The sfle ls intersected by 148^Avenue SE and SE 124"Street. The sauMeast comer o�the slte indudes e 28-bt subdivision.The}reots to the noM and west are typicaly 2.0 ecres v�size or Wrger.The proposed Ciry zonMg for the subject ennexatbn site Is R-5 Zone,allowirp up to 5 dwelling uniGa per pet acre.This compareble to current King Counry R-4 zoninp which allows up to 4 dwelling units per nross acre. A concurtent razone hom ttie Counrys Rd Zone W Remon's R-5 Zone is also bei�processetl as a pan of this application. PR0.IECT LOCATION: At the intersectbn ot SE 124'"Street and 148°i Avenue SE in Kinp County. PUBUC APPqOVALS: Mnezebon antl Rezone � Ma� �� OBBeN 117'H ONDIRY 1 U � � � � II r.tOqJ � 6U Hh R �r ' � % SI � � fF 4M Sl T,f7Tni-'IfTI"TTTTrr—rrti nlfTffl . Commenis m fhe above applicaGon muat be submitted in wrlting to Donald ENckson,AICP,Devalopment Services DNisbn,1055 Soulh Grady Way.Renton,WA 98055,hy 5:00 PM on July 6°i,2007. tl you have questions aban this proposal,or wish fo be matle a party of recortl end receive additlonal notlf�ation by mail,contact Don Erickson at(425) 430-6581.Myone who submNs wrMen comments will allometicalty become a parry ot recorU a�W will be notifietl of any decisbn on this WMect PLEASE INCLUDE TFiE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALUNG FOR PROPEH FlLE IDENTIFlCA710N DATE OF APPLICA710N: Mey 37,2001 NOTiCE Of COMPLETE MPLICATION: June 18,2001 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: June 27",2001 I(you would Gke to be matle a parry of record to receive further infortnation on Uiis proposed project,complete this(orm antl reNm to:City of Renlon,Deveiopment Plenninp,1055 SouM Grady W ay,Rentai,WA 98055. Flle NoJName: LUA-01-84,A,R NAME ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: N0710E OF MPL1CA710N CERTIFICATION I, ��t �v�e ��,C�Cr�t�rJ , herebycertifythat �� copies ofthe above document were posted by me in� /l�conspicuous places on or nearby the described properiy on ze � � �% Signed: �- �� ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me,a Nortary Public,in and for the tate of Washington residing�.�?.,�1�. , on the �day of a e'�,��,�f��'!� i��fCF��FF '�'� � � �C��Y PUBLIC \� S7�'�TE OF V�;qS�INGTON co�nn�s��i�rv�xRt�Es JUi��2�,2t3Q3 MAF�.YN Kp1AACHEFF MY AppOMRMEM'EXPiRES:6-29�03 �y ,.z � CITY (� RENTON ,.LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 19, 2001 Mr. Mark Holland Pacific Land Consulting, Inc. 13619 Mukilteo Speedway Lynnwood, WA 98037 SUBJECT: Shamrock Annexation and Rezone Project No. LUA-01-084,A,R Dear Mr. Holland: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted ' for review. You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at(425)430-6581, if you have any questions. Sincerely, _V . Donald Erickson Senior Planner cc: Parties of Record: K.Wilson, M. Schirman, C.Wolf,T.Waters, D. Shenk, L. Shenk,J. Waltosz a:�� '"` � � � � acceptance 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 �'`'" �. 1' �� d. N.' �This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer s��d4�', ' ��.,G��-,��,;��-_-:�� 112305906508 lb�lS05904009 1b�r�05930608 ANDERSON ROBERT L BALES LTD PS BENNER CLAY S+pATRICIA L PO BOX 353 13401 156TH AVE SE 14324 SE 125TH ST MAPLE VALLEY WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98038 98059 98059 102305935003 102305914503 102305930806 BERG BRIAN D BIGELOW CAROLYN BLESSING EMERY A+DONNA J 12035 148TH AVE SE 6929 37TH SW 14330 SE 125TH ST RENTON WA SEATTLE WA RENTON WA 98059 98126 98059 102305914206 112305908405 102305934501 BYERSDORFER DEBORAH PHELPS CAMPBELL DON R DAUGHERTY GREGORY WAYNE BYERSDORFER GREGORY A 12022 148TH AVE SE 12201 148TH AVE SE 22651 SE 56TH ST RENTON WA RENTON WA ISSAQUAH WA 98059 98059 98029 112305903208 102305931606 102305903381 DAVISON MATHEW J+KIMMI R EBBERT DAVID M FIFER RUTH L 14831 SE 120TH ST 459 NILE AVE NE 14325 SE 125TH RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 102305936803 102305919205 112305908702 GACEK THERESA HELEN ETAL HOAGUE ROBERT L HOLMQUIST ALAN D+JUNE LEA 2823 16TH AVE SO 431 NILE AVE NE 12050 148TH SE SEATTLE WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98144 98059 98059 112305905302 102305915807 102305939104 HOOVER LEON A JOHNSON WALTER M+KATHRYN M K1NG COUNTY 12012 148TH AVE SE 12006 142ND AVE SE 500 KC ADMIN BLDG SOOA RENTON WA RENTON WA SEATTLE WA 98059 98059 98104 112305903000 102305903506 102305904900 LACKEY JOAN MCTIGHE JOHN+ETAL MOORE MONTE D+KAREN L 5902 NE 4TH ST 24929 267TH SE 12226 142ND AVE SE RENTON WA RAVENSDALE WA RENTON WA 98059 98051 98059 112305902309 112305909304 112305901707 MULLENBERG DEAN&CAROLYN N G PROPERTIES L L C OLDING TERRY L 5816 NE 4TH PL 6234 139TH AVE SE 466 NILE AVE NE RENTON WA BELLEViJE WA RENTON WA 98059 98006 98059 102305923108 102305921904 102305911301 PIELE LEONARD+BRENDA PINCOMBE ROBERT S PRLTMMER FRANCIS J 14309 SE 125TH ST 451 NILE AVE NE 12227 142ND AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 102305932000 102305904108 102305903902 REED LAWRENCE A REID BENNIE J+BARBARA J RIBERA-BALKO ENTERPRISES 465 NILE AVE NE 5318 NE 4TH ST 16400 SOUTHCENTER PKWY STE308 RENTON WA RENTON WA SEATTLE WA 98059 98059 98188 102305902300 1''�"305900204 1brr�05918900 SCHIRMAN MICHAEL+WOLF CYNTH SHENK DAVID&LARRY WALTOSZ JAMES H 12013 148H AVE SE 12206 148TH SE 12021 148TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 102305917902 WATERS THOMAS M 12220 142ND S E RENTON WA 98059 �00/Z[Pas�nag) ��,. 5E " 8 � +er Y Z � � • 0 C) (? (� S [70 0o D D ,�D n D pi s� ,�D � D � -' � �n � c � ti '' o L y p � 5 c N o v �_� m � i; m c v � � a � � Q c �W � � o�n �('� Q�' e�;�z' ° °' `� }� C 3 � �� m /� �1 7 7 � . � 41 � � � � �' r�+. .V�� L. � M � � � � � � � � � o �: � � ao C7 � � �, a? �; = � � y " a �, � ° o � 3y r Z � � oa�. � � m � �' � 9� woo �c� N � mr c. �• � a� � c � �-� � � o � � � � � p � � � � m °- � y' �� ' �' � � .�' � � � � r', v m � o � N � C v° uw n,� o � � �+o v � 7 � W = 3 � � � g O � � fu' 9 N �. .�� ° � ; � � m � = z m � � � �. � � �. � � � ;� � � � _ � � � � � �. � � o �; � o o TYPE OF APPLICATIONIPERMIT v; � m n ... �,,Annexation(10yo Notice of Intent) � � x 4, Annexatlon(60°k Petition) n � x Appeal m °' x Business License for Home Occupation� � � o x Comp.Plan Map Ame�dmenURezone c � x Comp.Pian Text Amendment � � Conditional Approval Permit for a m Nonconforming Structure N � � Conditional Approval Permit for a d Nonconforming Use < n, i, �„ � �„ Condklonal Use Pertnit(Administrative) Q � ? A �, ,,,,, X c„ Conditional Use Permit(Hearing Examiner) m � cn x cn Environmental Review ,� o x Environmental Review(Non-Project) � ;� v � �, � x Grade and Fill Permk(Special) r �' � m » Kennel License �? � � z Kennel License,Hobby � � w x Lot Line Adjustment o p � ,�, �„ ,,,, Master Site Plan(Overall) � <" o A �r, v, � Master Slte Plan(Individual Phases) ' �„ ..,. x Mobfle Home Park,Preliminary a, ,i, � x a+ Moblle Home Park,Final A ModificationlAlternate Request A c,� x cn Plat,Finai .p, �„ �, k rv plat,Preliminary c„ ..� x PUD,PreUminary �, -. w x cn n� PUD,Final _, x Rezone cn x Routine Vegetation Management Permit Shoreline Exemption �, ... x Shoreline Substantial Development Permit �, � x Shoreline Conditional Use Permk V, .w x Shoreline Variance �, �, x N Short Plat,Preliminary �, ,p w cn Short Plat,Final DEVELOPMEfVT PLR�IPJIiR1�, A c� � x Site Plan C�1Y OF iEf�JTON �, ... x Special Permit MAY 1 � �„ v, x n� Temporary Use Permit 3 �� x Variance �� Waiver �„ Wetla�d Permit '1(17.L-R-t� � '� � 9£- 8 '� (pp/Z I Pas�nag) t z � v �- m � v� s = G) c) G3 'n � � m m m m v Ca v � vi � � • x x � d di m D 3 m � M v� < o� m m o p � m m mc H (D Q: d d O O O N 4! � <. < < � � �(}' o o � � � � 3 n � 2 � � � � o. �: � � � c 3 � r � N 3 ,Z � .p p � (� � d 41 d > � W �p y .� -� � � �: 3 � � �, � rn � � � D � �y � o � � ��—, ci ai c> � �i o �n °' � ('3 � m D r— Z <i � � p �. m � � � ' � � ' � � Q—' d � o � < z r (7 �' �. � fl,' � 'qD -�o � o m n�i m � t� a M � o � -� � � o- � � > > � � � W � � &"i y S � t� � � N � C � //� p �' G C7 fn '1� O. � �y ~ (C i � � O {/� � yi n � C ,O � n � N � N � � " y �{y � � d O Z � �G d /� ^ � �m3 � � w � � �- �. V/ � � N � � . d1 � p � N. �� W � w v `� TYPE OF APPLICATIONIPERMIT a Annexation(10°k Notice of Intent) 0 m � 4, Annexation(60%Petition) a 3 Appeal � sBusiness License for Home Occupation� o N cr, cr� N Comp.Plan Map AmendmenURezone c � N h, Comp.Plan Text Amendment � � � f, Conditional Approval Permit for a y Nonconforming Structure N f � � i, Conditional Approval Permit for a d Nonconforming Use <' �- c„ �, � u, cn �, cn cn ti, A N a cn a Conditional Use Permk(Administrative) Q � � cn �, � v� cn N cn cn N a. N A cn a. Conditional Use Permit(Hearing Examiner) � v' N N �' �' t i v' �' � A na A �' A Environmental Review � � N Environmental Review(Non-Project) � � N a, N �` �+ �, A A � +' Grade and Fill Permit(Special) rn '^ Ke�nel License � � � z Kennel License,Hobby � yv� cr� c.� .� Lot Line Adjustment p � �, N � +cn c,r� N � Master Site Plan(Overali) n � �, N cn a, N cn v, � A N � cn a Master Site Plan(Individual Phases) N N r� v� cr N A A c�+ Mobile Home Park,Preiiminary � A A Mobile Home Park,Final Modification/Altemate Request N cn v+ N cn A Plat,Firtal �, us cn � � a cn Plat,Preliminary N N � '�" n� "� �T' t i A ro A '"' PUD,Preliminary �, �+ �+ N N +� PUD,Final u+ cn � A Rezone �* Routine Vegetation Management Permit Shoreline Exemption N N U' V' n� '" �' n� A i +' �' Shoreline Substantial Development Permit N N '� �" n� �' '�" n3 ;' N t' �" Shoreline Conditional Use Permit N N � �' � � �" n> i i Shoreline Variance N N n� � �T' i a' �" Short Plat,Preliminary � A Short Plat,Final N N �' � n3 �" � N A N +' � ?Site Plan v N N �' �T' n> t" v' na � i Special Permit r;, . cn v� � cr+ Temporary Use Permit N �+ �+ r:� "' '�" o Variance Waiver N N v+ cn N cn cn N ? ? cn Wetiand Permit . - ��Z�'g'� M (00/Z[Pasina�) ,�v L£'8 �, Z '�' �� W � +� W � r m � � c` � � c � � c �v � m c � . � �+� � r��i .� cc � �i � t° � � » a � ,�b � �'o � A W � �� .� � � �: � � � y �� m � < � _ ° � s3 r � �� - � � o �� d � Q �. � � � �. � � � � � _� v D � � w� m � � c�'i m �' � � � � � �v� vv � mD r � � w � � � ''� � co m � Z � : �� o �' o � 0 3 o Z ("� 0 ` � � � � � �� d � o � m s � � D n 1�i � O ��,s � � a �j � 4 a � o c'i o O � �• t'��D � � C �.� c�i v' m � o � p, � a �, ,� � � � � � � � � a � � o Zm ", �.� � �_ � " � W �, � �. � � m t7 � r.� � — � um, 3 m — m' — � 3 � — TYPE OF APPLICATION/PERMIT �; t* o, w Annexation(10%Notice of Intent) 'o °' -• Annexation(609�a Petition) m w n � � Appeal � Business License for Home Occupation� � o N W Comp.Plan Map AmendmenURezone c 3 N Comp.Plan Text Amendment � � � � Conditional Approval Permk for a � Nonconforming Structure N �' Conditional Approval Permk for a n£i "' `�' Nonconforming Use < a N '�„ �, N Conditional Use Permft(Administrotive) v � � N ,�, �, N Conditional Use Permft(Hearing Examl�er) m N a, �, Environmental Review ,,,� � D o Environmental Review(Non-Project) W -�--� � N Grade and Fiil Permit(Special) m ? Kennel License ? � Kennel License,Hobby � � �„ Lot Line Adjustment o � p Master Site Plan(Overall) � C N � N N Master Site Plan(Individual Phases) ' � N c,,, Mobile Home Park,Preliminary N Mobile Home Park,Final ModificationlAltemate Request N Piat,Final N �„ Plat,Prelimi�ary N �„ PUD,Preliminary N PUD,Final N � Rezone Routine Vegetation Management Permit A . Shoreline Exemption N a, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit N a, Shoretine Conditional Use Permit N Shoreline Variance N Short Plat,Preliminary N Short Plat,Final N �, Site Plan �, a, Special Permit , �, �„ Temporary Use Permit 0 o Variance Waiver N Wetland Permit �OZ 4-8-� s � $E- $ '� �0021 Pasina�) � Z � v � � Z 3 � 3 � � � � � � Ot � r' �1r C� N � � cn D � c � � d w coo � d cn+ m � �t � � N � mm � A � T � � � 01 pQ � � �n � Ys v �--'' `x • o �• j ? � c � m cj p O T-�' � m -�i� � � � ", t0 � � C 3 V � fl..� � co m � 3 m -+. �`S W v, D D o m w m (�' q � D �C m � � � -* n � x � _+ � � � �c � ,o_r, � � � v ?.� �• � a b 'm � � � �m 3 D r � �" � �c c� m � � � � y, w m W � n x �: m � Z W �' m n. �; �' -� � . �- u� � -�n z n . � � y � �q y � o �� , 7 � s a � � � � �- � ,;., m � o .� � �n ^ m Z7 � � D� � � �. S N � C o � � a g m �' ° � � c� 3 p y �D � ai � �• � �r m sp v � � � �. � � °i '�o `� m (n ? Q m w `- � o, v m `�� n. � � o O � a n Z ( C IIi� � //� 61 �11 7 j �� y � � ' �' V I 40 +�& m p � � � n �' 3 � � W � � � �' � � NPE�F APPLICATION/PERMIT y � � � � � o: � -� �. ra Annexation(10°k Notice of Intent) � � W �,, � n> ro Annexation(60°�Petition) n � Appeal W � -� Business License for Home Occupation� o i N N r.� ra Comp.Plan Map AmendmenURezone C � �, r;, Comp.Pla�Text Amendment � Conditlonal Approval Permit for a N cn � cn N N Nonconforming Structure y g � � � �y � Condkional Approval Permit for a d Nonconforming Use <' n � v, N �, v, n� rv cn Conditional Use Permk(Administrative) v � W } cn � N w n� � cn Condkional Use Permk(Hearing Examiner) � �+ cn w �, ur N ►� u+ Environmental Review D� r;, Environmental Review(Non-Project) W m v+ � N r.� ++� rn Grade and Fill Permk(Special) m ' Kennel License A � � � Kennel License,Hobby � J � � � � �+ � Lot Line Adjustment o R N N n� a.,� cr� Master Site Plan(Overall) n < � � N N N ra �w Master Site Plan(Individual Phases) cn N � N ns +� cr Mobile Home Park,Prelimfnary N �, Mobile Home Park,Final cn Modification/Alternate Request �+ -� �+ � Plat,Final � N N � s� Plat,Preliminary N r;, n� r.� +�n PUD,Preliminary �+ � -• �, PUD,Final � N ►� � Rezone -y Routine Vegetation Management Permit � A Shoreline Exemption �+ �y ,�, N � � Shoreline Substantial Development Permit cr � �;, rv iv cn Shoreline Conditional Use Permit �+ �'v n, +� +� � Shoreline Variance N N ^� ^� � Short Plat,Preliminary Short Plat,Final a, N N N w cn Site Plan � ti, N n� � � Special Permit cr cn n� ra c�+ Temporary Use Permit �+ o o +� N �+ Variance Waiver N N +�_ sr Wetland Permit �OZ�-8-b � (00/ZI Pasinag) �r 6E '8 �� . z tn �n ln tn 3 cn f» D � � :[1 'U o -p _�► � � 'G v ii v � N � � io � o O �. ? <'D �° c fl '�d a' t� ?� m � W °: ' , � p Oo ,, m y � v '�`T► o�i � � ,"w„� m �� v�, "' �• '� m � C 3 � r1� � o ? � fl; ?;, o' D m o' < �'• � o �:' m 61 °' �' � ' c m -�I � Y � �- � � �, � �, � � � �► � �' -� o . � � = 3 � r Z � ° n, ? � �• � � $ � �' my � � � � m � � � Z C� � �D. � �t "-o = 3 o a v ��t o o "�a � � y v�i a a W .� 7 tWn .-. r� � (3 'p `"� -C m p) m � � C�/� () � O � ,�w. � ,�-,r � � .n-. � "�� V� 0 ry ""� � � d f6 � � (�i � ai O � 3 � •< F. � � a r- a � � (�z�' m y � � v W � -w � � v� ^ Z = N � � � � �. d � � 7 C� �. 7 � '�* � � � 3 � ,,,� TYPE OF APPLICATION/PERMIT N n ~' �.x Annexation(10ya Notice of Intent) 0 � 4, x Annexation(60%Petition) a � Appeal � � x Business License for Home Occupation� � o �, � c,+r x � Comp.Plan Map AmendmenURezone _ � � �, �, cn Comp.Plan Text Amendment � � � � x � Conditional Approval Permit for a m Nonconforming Structure N " � Conditional Approval Permit for a m n� "' � "' "' " Nonconforming Use <' a � �„ � � cn x � Condkional Use Permit(Administrative) v � , � � � � cn x -• Conditional Use Permit(Hearing Examiner) m � � � � c�, x � Environmental Review < � o N �, ; Environmental Review(Non-Project) W � 3 �, �, cn �c` � Grade and Fill Permit(Special) m m _'. Kennel Lfcense ? � Kennel License,Hobby � W vt Lot Lfne Adjustment p N � v N N cn x � Master Site Plan(Overall) < � j N N �y c» x � Master Site Plan(Individual Phases) � c�+ x � Mobile Home Park,Preliminary N ro -� Mobile Home Park,Final �, �,,, v, Modification/Alternate Request � N A � Plat,Final �, u+ � Plat,Preliminary � �, cn x � pUD,Preliminary � n, x s PUD,Final � cn � Rezone -+ x � Routine Vegetation Management Permit ;, .� -• Shoreline Exemption � N cn x -• Shoreline Substantial Development Permit � u� x -� Shoreline Conditionai Use Permit � cn x -� Shoreline Variance N n, vr x � Short Plat,Preliminary v, ro c� Short Plat,Final � � �, x , Site Plan i�1 N ►� � N cn x -� Special Permit �„ cr� cn x Temporary Use Permit -� o cr� x � yariance 0 cr Walver � � x � Wetland Permit N ��Z��g-� , '�r Qti- $ �00/ZI Pasrna2I) � i z � � � c � c D -j v_ —i -i � -�i cn H �cn � 3cn � � v> � v� D c ,� � W � co a v � w m' m �° � c < m � m co � � o m c � � 5. d 'o m � co � 0 19 Z °' su � c cn co � m � � D o0 o � �i. u��,. 'r a � m� c_ � � � v m � �� m u o W m@ ° � c 3 � r � � � � � m � �. d m � � � � m � � � � �� W � Z "� ,` O � a � a c. � � W m � r Z 3 ti p c. a �- �s. 3 Z 0 E W m � am � v '0 ,^* m' m� co +� � D �p � � � � � � � a� d � � m � � y ti�� y � � � 0 0� � �' o o � m �a�c �� F,m' �t '� C -g �, � � � � > > � `� � � �. �`pj � O � �o i � � � ro � g � � a � � � o� Z 1T1 �o ^ � � m y � � � -o � � r� m � 0 � � � b � = y � d � � y (0 �Vi N. � � ° � TYPE OF APPLICATION/PERMIT � �: Annexation(10°k Notice of Intent) 0 w a Annexation(60%Petkionj � Appeal W sBusiness License for Home Occupation� o u� Comp.Plan Map AmendmenURezone c � Comp.Plan Text Amendment � Condkionat Approval Permit for a N Nonconforming Structure y f Condkional Approval Permit for a °' Nonconforming Use < W � � w �, cn � A v, Condkional Use Permit(Administrative) � � w N ca � A cn Co�dkional Use Permit(Hearing Examiner) � ca �, tn A cr� Environmental Review � � Environmental Review(Non-Project) � � �, � +� A Grade and Fill Permit(Special) m ' Kennel License A � � z Kennei License,Hobby � m i;, .v� Lot Line Adjustment o N � N cn A � v, Master Site Plan(Overall) � � r,a N v, .a a . � cn Master Site Plan(Indlvidual Phases) w N � +� � Mobile Home Park,Preliminary Mobile Home Park,Final cn Mod�cation/Alternate Request A Plat,Final w A v+ Plat,Preliminary w U+ � � PUD,Preliminary � PUD,Final � Rezone N A Routine Vegetation Management Permit w' n� +� Shoreline Exemption '�' n� t" A '� Shoreline Substantial Development Permit w N zn A cn Shoreline Conditional Use Permit 4' n� �" A Shoreline Variance u' n> � A Short Plat,Preliminary Short Plat,Final w N rn � a cn .r> Site Plan �' n> u+ A � Specfai Permit W � +� Temporary Use Permit � �, �+ Variance Waiver w N Wetland Permit �OZ 6"8-� �' `� � -�� PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: �l�/��' f' �1f, �Lt�:i� � c.��'/��'�� 1'��'f� ��e� "� � PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION and Zip�Cof e: , ,,j ADDRE$S: /��y , -r".�1� �� .1?�r''�i'f�� /19G't��r�G�L�'Pyt d�C%!T� /!S , � ��,�� v��e�'� ��..� �. cirY: �� , ziP: _ iY�y y� �ll�' .- ��> � , � KING COUVTY ASSESSOR'S ACC U�T NUMBER(S): TELEPHONE NUMBER: ,�,/ �G� ��'.�i �o�r G�/,�'C�,f��La'S� � /��t. � C� / � ` �; � / ,,�A EXIST NG LAND USE(S): �/.'C,�^ 'ZZG1��?�f/��4 /��+-'.� ,.�'j f, ?>, � ��C� c? �l�+�'a'/f��' 6t'�• NAME: � / � O ///.�%'h✓ ��/'/� `IG �OPOS�LAND USE(S ' Jr� /� ��✓�'N CO PANY(if applicable): ° ; � EXISTING COMPREH SIVE�. N MAP DESIGNATION: di�� - ��: �,�� ,� l�'�"�'�r ADDRESS: I�� /�jG��_.s'� ��-��f.� PROPOSED COMPREHENSIV PLAN MAP DESIGNATION �, (if appticable): �� ►��p CITY: %l/�� W/'� • IP: ��] . � EXISTING ZONING: J�� l-��f(f� TELEPHO E NUMBER ,�� l�'�.�.� PROPOSED ZONING(if applicable): �C��f �G��t% SITE AREA (in square feet): UL�� -�.�j NAME: j� SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED ��'f�? �1�G7.�G�?'J FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE OTS O MORE(if appl"cable): COMPANY(i applicable): ��1�/�'� � , /�� 1� � � �5 �� '�� G�e� �-�' �r'�� PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENS TY IN UNITS PER NET ADDRESS: /��y a �� %��.' ACRE(if applicable): � � �j��, �� NUM�R OF PROPO,SEp LOTS(if applicable): CITY: �7�/ /�� ZIP: ��'�� /l�`� �D NUMBER OF NEW DWEL G UJ�jITS(if applicabl,�): TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: � � � �'�f��l �� NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS(if applicable): C��,�"> �3�� ,�' � �� -, �i� } �I � -� /`..'!!�l� L�Gl,� ��`+/!!'�' �YG-r'� masterap.doc Revised April 2001 ��, n!�� G�--L' ?`'jt�� h`J � � (.� � �' /'C ��7 (� ,� - �.r;�&.'= A:�: .a d ,t+. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PROJECT VALUE: �o� /�� `� �I�ft`� BUILDINGS(if applicable): � /�it� SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIA IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF BUILDINGS TO REMAIN(if applicable): �,°�a ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA,PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPO��D ON-RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE(if applicable): BUILDINGS(if applicabie): N ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIQ TIAL ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS TO REMAIN(if applicabie): � ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq.ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-,R IDENTIAL BUILDINGS(if ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq.ft. applicable): � ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq.ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMP�O� BY THE � SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq.ft. NEVN PROJECT(if applicable): � W��NDS sq.ft. / � c�..�� /, ��p-��.� � .� �ANNEXATION(A) $ SHORELINE REVIEWS COMP PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA) $ CONDITIONAL USE(SM-C) $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CU-A U-H) $ EXEMPTION(SME) $ NO CHARGE ,�ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(ECF)�/��Y/�, $ _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT(SM) $ GRADE&FILL PERMIT(GF) �� $ VARIANCE(SM-V) $ (No.Cu.Yds: ) $ �,REZONE(R) $ SUBDIVISION ROUTINE VEGETATION $ BINDING SITE PLAN(BSP) $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT(RVMP) FINAL PLAT(FP) $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL(SA-A,SA-H) $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT(LLA) S SPECIAL PERMIT(SP) $ PRELIMINARY PLAT(PP) $ TEMPORARY PERMIT(TP) $ SHORT PLAT(SHPL-A,SHPL-H) $ VARIANCE(V-A,V-H,V-B) $ (from Section: ) $ Postage: $ WAIVER(W) $ TOTAL FEE $ OTHER: $ I,(Print Name) �'� ,declare that I am(please check one) _the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation(please attach proof of authorization)and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in ali respects true and coRect to the best of my knowledge and belief. 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. /��I� J /'�ll-'I��- (Name of Owner/Representative) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) (Signature of Owner/Representative) My appointment expires: masterap.doc Revised Apri12001 102305902300 1�5900204 1�5918900 SCHIRMAN MICHAEL+WOLF CYNTH SHENK DAVID&LARRY WALTOSZ JAMES H 12013 148H AVE SE 12206 148TH SE 12021 148TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 102305917902 WATERS THOMAS M �� /', )�(� 12220 142ND S E «� RENTON WA Gl� ��J()2Ti1� c9ry'�� 98059 1dCZ� �• 33�� Fec�,p�� G�, ��3 ��3� ��- �.� � ,�, �'� P�V 'i �"�),\J �v �� .! PJl�' �� , . . j �,, . �� ,� ,,� ) `�` .� ° \L -��,,1�' \,� ' '�`� � -�� `��, �` / Y DEV CI'�T`P(OF RENT�N ING MAY 3 � 2a�� r✓ Annexation Review Form - Shamrock Annexation (X) 10% Notice of Intent ( ) 60%Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Don Erickson, AICP / Senior Planner Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning SUBJECT : Proposed Shamrock Annexation Location : Generally norfh and west of the existing city limits north of NE 4'"Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 150'h Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. Date Circulated: 5/31/Ol Comments Due; 6/14/O1 General Information Area : 66.6 acres Street length : 0 Assessed Value ; $6,829,000 Estimated Population . 65 Current Uses Residential : ±20 dwellings, majority of area vacant Commercial : N/A Industrial ; N/A Public : Streets only. Comp Plan : Resource Conservation Designation Future Uses; : Single family Future Po ulation • Est. 480 ersons 260 homes Reviewing Department/Division: l. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �EVC�TY OF RE�ON�N� Mar 3 � zo�� RE�CEIVED 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? (Over) �rr �r►' 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? 4, What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (if yes, please indicate on the aitached map.) General recommendation and comments: Signature; Date; '�r' �.rr Shamrock Annexation The City has received a 10% Notice of Intent for Annexation Petition for the proposed Shamrock Annexation, a 66.16 acre area located approximately 600' north of NE 4t1' Street and bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the east by 150 Avenue SE, if extended, and on the north by SE 1215`Street, if extended. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger. The proposed zoning for this annexation is the R-5 Zone, allowing up to 5 du/units per net acre. The 66.16-acre site could theoretically accommodate approximately 260 dwelling units. � �. SHAMROCK ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter and the North half(1/2) of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the South half(1/2) of the North half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10,EXCEPT the North 132 feet thereof; AND the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, of Section 11, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,King County, ' Washington. DEVELOPMElr,i"T,�'i_��iaswlfv� CITY QF i��y'TOCa MAY 3 t ��' RE'�� r � � RO�� . . . 9 Annexation Review Form - Shamrock Annexation (X) 10% Notice of Intent ( ) 60%Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Don Erickson, AICP /Senior Pianner Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Shamrock Annexation Location : Generally north and west of the existing city limits north of NE 4"'Street between Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the west and 150'h Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. Date Circulated: 5/31/Ol Comments Due: 6/14/O1 General Information Area : 66.6 acres Street length : 0 Assessed Value : 56,829,000 Estimated Population . 65 Current Uses Residential : ±20 dweliings, majority of area vacant Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : Streets only. Comp Plan : Resource Conservation Designation Future Uses: : Single family Future Po ulation • Est. 480 ersons 260 homes Reviewing Department/Division: 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �E��iN M��vT P OF�'�EfVTON�nlCa, MAY 3 1 20�1 RECEIVE� 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? (Over) , � � 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) General recommendation and comments: Signature: Date: • +.r` ��r► Shamrock Annexation The City has received a 10% Notice of Intent for Annexation Petition for the proposed Shamrock Annexation, a 66.16 acre area located approximately 600' north of NE 4`t' Street and bounded on the west by Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, on the east by 150 Avenue SE, if extended, and on the north by SE 1215`Street, if extended. The southeast corner of the site includes a 26-lot subdivision. The tracts to the north and west are typically 2.0 acres or larger. The proposed zoning for this annexation is the R-5 Zone, allowing up to 5 du/units per net acre. The 66.16-acre site could theoretically accommodate approximately 260 dwelling units. D�VE��pME Cl1yOF q�M„��Nl�,�: MAr31 �� Proposed Shamrock Annex� tion 117 h t > Q � 0 0 � � � S w > � � � � � 124th PI � � � � � �l � -� -� I � � � h PI � � � � � N h St h St z E 1 nd t 2n St � SE 13 Proposed annexation boundary D��CiN oF�ENTON �N� - -- - Existing corporate boundary 0 600 1,200 �ti�Y o�, EDNSP MAY 31 �� + Sue Cadson,Administrator O.Dennison �] ��NT�� 20Apri12001 ��A��"y�"� 1. /�200 �r � � SHAMROCK ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter and the North half(1/2) of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, of Section 10,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the South half(1/2) of the North half(1/2) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10, EXCEPT the North 132 feet thereof; AND the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, of Section 11, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,King County, Washington. D�CIN O ENTO NING MAY ? � ��-� !�+��.��. � � Propv�Shamrock Annexation-Affected Owners �r✓ Name Address Parcel Number LAI MAN-LING 12841 LIJNADA PL 1023059069 SAN DIEGO CA 92128 HOILAND JOHN D ET AL 1411 S CONCORD#5 1023059384 SEATTLE WA 98108 MARTIN KENNETH A 12439 148TH AVE SE 1023059383 RENTON WA 98059 GILBERT KEITH C+CATHERINE C 12609 148TH AVE SE 1023059341 RENTON WA 98059 HOHLBEIN ERIK F+MICHELLE L 12438 148TH AVE SE 2739200071 RENTON WA 98059 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 12436 149TH AVE SE 2739200220 RENTON WA 98056 LARSON JAMES M+GLORIA E 12430 148TH AVE SE 2739200060 RENTON WA 98059 KOCH JOHN E+PATRICIA D 12605 148TH AVE SE 1023059038 RENTON WA 98056 BIELKA RONALD G 18419 SE 122ND 2739200080 ISSAQUAH WA 98027 POWERS JACK M+DENISE T 12207 148TH AVE SE 1023059259 RENTON WA 98059 BIELKA RONALD G 18419 SE 122ND 2739200090 ISSAQUAH WA 98027 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 12436 149TH AVE SE 2739200210 RENTON WA 98056 PALZER CATHY 36256 SE FISH HATCHERY RD 2739200110 FALL CITY WA 98024 � MLJNRO RICHARD G 12414 148TH AVE SE 2739200040 ��V CI'�f`(OF P�NTON I�C� OSSON WA MAY 3 1 2d�1 1 of 4 �ECEIVEQ Prop� Shamrock Annexation-Affected Owners � Name Address Parcel Number REPENN ROGER 12422 149TH AVE SE 2739200240 RENTON WA 98056 HALFHILL DAVID K&SUSAN L 12428 149TH AVE SE 2739200190 RENTON WA 98059 PALANCHUK GEORGIY+NATALYA 12205 148TH AVE SE 1023059030 RENTON WA 98059 SMITH ROY 12265 148TH ST SE 1023059174 RENTON WA 98056 SMITH ROY 12265 148TH ST SE 1023059174 RENTON WA 98059 REPENN ROGER 12422 149TH AVE SE 2739200250 RENTON WA 98056 REPENN ROGER L 12422 149TH AVE SE 2739200180 RENTON WA 98055 SCOTT SHARON ELIZABETH 12610 148TH AVE SE 1123059031 RENTON WA 98059 PHUNG AN T 9333 57TH AVE W 1023059042 MUKILTEO WA 98275 BASHARY SHAY 10025 SE 260TH ST 1023059026 KENT WA 98031 HURLOCKER CHARLES W+NORMA A 12217 148H AVE SE 1023059319 RENTON WA 98059 HUNSAKER PAT 12409 148TH AVE SE 1023059191 RENTON WA 98059 FLATTUM PATRICIA LEE 12422 148TH AVE SE 2739200050 RENTON WA 98059 WEGNER BRETT+MARY K 12211 148TH AVE SE 1023059021 RENTON WA 98059 2 of 4 Prop�,�i Shamrock Annexation-Affected Owners `�r+' Name Address Parcel Number HODGE HAROLD D 19210 121 ST PL SE 1023059170 RENTON WA 98055 HUNSAKER PAT 12409 148TH AVE SE 1023059031 RENTON WA 98059 KELLY BRYANT K S 12601 148TH AVE SE 1023059355 RENTON WA 98059 HUNSAKER JIM&DENISE 12409 148TH SE 1023059415 RENTON WA 98056 HLINSAKER JIM 11335 DURLAND PL NE 1023059022 SEATTLE WA 98125 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 12436 149TH AVE SE 2739200200 RENTON WA 98059 SIKES DONALD K JR+CINDY I P 33010 SE 118TH ST 2739200100 ISSAQUAH WA 98027 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 12436 149TH AVE SE 2739200230 RENTON WA 98056 JARVIS JERRY 12204 148TH SE 1123059092 RENTON WA 98055 NUGYEN NGOC 12232 148TH SE 1123059067 RENTON WA 98059 FLATTUM PATRICIA LEE 12422 148TH AVE SE 2739200120 RENTON WA 98059 MLJNRO RICHARD G+BARBARA C 12414 148TH AVE SE 2739200030 RENTON WA 98059 METCALFE WILLIAM 12260 148TH SE 1123059070 RENTON WA 98059 BOWEN RALPH P JR 12415 149TH AVE SE 2739200130 RENTON WA 98055 3 of 4 Prop�ei Shamrock Annexation-Affected Owners 'rrr� Name Address Parcel Number KINGSTON CHARLIE&STACY 12406 149TH AVE SE 2739200160 RENTON WA 98059 ENGH DALE+ENGH MARY E ROBINSON- 12250 148TH AVE SE 1123059075 RENTON WA 98059 RILEY JOHN 12414 149TH AVE SE 2739200260 RENTON WA 98055 HAMMOND JAMES C+ERIKA L 12414 149TH AVE SE 2739200170 RENTON WA 98059 KRISTOFERSON RICHARD 15807 60TH DR SE 2739200140 SNOHOMISH WA 98296 KRISTOFERSON RICHARD 15807 60TH DR SE 2739200150 SNOHOMISH WA 98296 BOWEN JR RALPH P+BRENDA M 12415 149TH AVE SE 2739200020 RENTON WA 98059 BOWEN JR RALPH P+BRENDA M 12415 149TH AVE SE 2739200010 RENTON WA 98059 ELLIS STANLEY E PO BOX 2442 1123059091 RENTON WA 98055 TOMLINSON ERIC D+AUTUMN 12240 148TH AVE SE 1123059078 RENTON WA 98056 JARVIS JERRY D 12204 148TH SE ll23059010 RENTON WA 98055 4of4 Propc�,,,d Shamrock Annexation-Affected Owners �wrr' Name Address Parcel Number LAI MAN-LING 12841 LLJNADA PL 1023059069 SAN DIEGO CA 92128 HOILAND JOHN D ET AL 1411 S CONCORD#5 1023059384 SEATTLE WA 98108 MARTIN KENNETH A 12439 148TH AVE SE 1023059383 RENTON WA 98059 GILBERT KEITH C+CATHERINE C 12609 148TH AVE SE 1023059341 RENTON WA 98059 HOHLBEIN ERIK F+MICHELLE L 12438 148TH AVE SE 2739200071 RENTON WA 98059 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 12436 149TH AVE SE 2739200220 RENTON WA 98056 LARSON JAMES M+GLORIA E 12430 148TH AVE SE 2739200060 RENTON WA 98059 KOCH JOHN E+PATRICIA D 12605 148TH AVE SE 1023059038 RENTON WA 98056 BIELKA RONALD G 18419 SE 122ND 2739200080 ISSAQUAH WA 98027 POWERS JACK M+DENISE T 12207 148TH AVE SE 1023059259 RENTON WA 98059 BIELKA RONALD G 18419 SE 122ND 2739200090 ISSAQUAH WA 98027 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 12436 149TH AVE SE 2739200210 RENTON WA 98056 PALZER CATHY 36256 SE FISH HATCHERY RD 2739200110 FALL CITY WA 98024 MUNRO RICHARD G 12414 148TH AVE SE 2739200040 RENTON WA 98055 1 of 4 Prop�Shamrock Annexation-Affected Owners � Name Address Parcel Number REPENN ROGER 12422 149TH AVE SE 2739200240 RENTON WA 98056 HALFHILL DAVID K&SUSAN L 12428 149TH AVE SE 2739200190 RENTON WA 98059 PALANCHUK GEORGIY+NATALYA 12205 148TH AVE SE 1023059030 RENTON WA 98059 SMITH ROY 12265 148TH ST SE 1023059174 RENTON WA 98056 SMITH ROY 12265 148TH ST SE 1023059174 RENTON WA 98059 REPENN ROGER 12422 149TH AVE SE 2739200250 RENTON WA 98056 REPENN ROGER L 12422 149TH AVE SE 2739200180 RENTON WA 98055 SCOTT SHARON ELIZABETH 12610 148TH AVE SE 1123059031 RENTON WA 98059 PHLJNG AN T 9333 57TH AVE W 1023059042 MUKILTEO WA 98275 BASHARY SHAY 10025 SE 260TH ST 1023059026 KENT WA 98031 HURLOCKER CHARLES W+NORMA A 12217 148H AVE SE 1023059319 RENTON WA 98059 HLJNSAKER PAT 12409 148TH AVE SE 1023059191 RENTON WA 98059 FLATTUM PATRICIA LEE 12422 148TH AVE SE 2739200050 RENTON WA 98059 WEGNER BRETT+MARY K 12211 148TH AVE SE 1023059021 RENTON WA 98059 2 of 4 Propcs�,,,d Shamrock Annexation-Affected Owners � Name Address Parcel Number HODGE HAROLD D 19210 121 ST PL SE 1023059170 RENTON WA 98055 HLJNSAKER PAT 12409 148TH AVE SE 1023059031 RENTON WA 98059 KELLY BRYANT K S 12601 148TH AVE SE 1023059355 RENTON WA 98059 HUNSAKER JIM&DENISE 12409 148TH SE 1023059415 RENTON WA 98056 HiJNSAKER JIM 11335 DURLAND PL NE 1023059022 SEATTLE WA 98125 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 12436 149TH AVE SE 2739200200 RENTON WA 98059 SIKES DONALD K JR+CINDY I P 33010 SE 118TH ST 2739200100 ISSAQUAH WA 98027 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 12436 149TH AVE SE 2739200230 RENTON WA 98056 JARVIS JERRY 12204 148TH SE 1123059092 RENTON WA 98055 NUGYEN NGOC 12232 148TH SE 1123059067 RENTON WA 98059 FLATTUM PATRICIA LEE 12422 148TH AVE SE 2739200120 RENTON WA 98059 MUNRO RICHARD G+BARBARA C 12414 148TH AVE SE 2739200030 RENTON WA 98059 METCALFE WILLIAM 12260 148TH SE 1123059070 RENTON WA 98059 BOWEN RALPH P JR 12415 149TH AVE SE 2739200130 RENTON WA 98055 3 of 4 Prop�l Shamrock Annexation-Affected Owners � Name Address Parcel Number KINGSTON CHARLIE&STACY 12406 149TH AVE SE 2739200160 RENTON WA 98059 ENGH DALE+ENGH MARY E ROBINSON- 12250 148TH AVE SE 1123059075 RENTON WA 98059 RILEY JOHN 12414 149TH AVE SE 2739200260 RENTON WA 98055 HAMMOND JAMES C+ERIKA L 12414 149TH AVE SE 2739200170 RENTON WA 98059 KRISTOFERSON RICHARD 15807 60TH DR SE 2739200140 SNOHOMISH WA 98296 KRISTOFERSON RICHARD 15807 60TH DR SE 2739200150 SNOHOMISH WA 98296 BOWEN JR RALPH P+BRENDA M 12415 149TH AVE SE 2739200020 RENTON WA 98059 BOWEN JR RALPH P+BRENDA M 12415 149TH AVE SE 2739200010 RENTON WA 98059 ELLIS STANLEY E PO BOX 2442 1123059091 RENTON WA 98055 TOMLINSON ERIC D+AUTUMN 12240 148TH AVE SE 1123059078 RENTON WA 98056 JARVIS JERRY D 12204 148TH SE 1123059010 RENTON WA 98055 4of4 ShamrockOwners PROPOSED SHAMROCK ANNEXATION King County Assessor's Records (01/01) Appraised Value Taxable Value PID TAXPAYERNAME Land Improved Total Land Improved Total 1023059069 LAI MAN-LING 100000 0 100000 100000 0 100000 1023059384 HOILAND JOHN D ET AL 95000 134000 229000 95000 134000 229000 1023059383 MARTIN KENNETH A 110000 123000 233000 110000 123000 233000 1023059341 GILBERT KEITH C+CATHERINE C 60000 118000 178000 60000 118000 178000 2739200071 HOHLBEIN ERIK F+MICHELLE L 55000 97000 152000 55000 97000 152000 2739200220 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200060 LARSON JAMES M+GLORIA E 55000 70000 125000 55000 70000 125000 1023059038 KOCH JOHN E+PATRICIA D 60000 80000 140000 60000 80000 140000 � 2739200080 BIELKA RONALD G 55000 85000 140000 55000 85000 140000 1023059259 POWERS JACK M+DENISE T 60000 104000 164000 60000 104000 164000 2739200090 BIELKA RONALD G 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200210 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200110 PALZER CATHY 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200040 MUNRO RICHARD G 55000 95000 150000 55000 95000 150000 2739200240 REPENN ROGER 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200190 HALFHILL DAVID K&SUSAN L 55000 86000 141000 55000 86000 141000 1023059030 PALANCHUK GEORGIY+NATALYA 135000 58000 193000 135000 58000 193000 1023059174 SMITH ROY 53200 125000 178200 47600 67100 114700 1023059174 SMITH ROY 41800 0 41800 41800 0 41800 2739200250 REPENN ROGER 55000 25000 80000 55000 25000 80000 2739200180 REPENN ROGER L 55000 92000 147000 55000 92000 147000 1123059031 SCOTT SHARON ELIZABETH 105000 98000 203000 105000 98000 203000 1023059042 PHUNG AN T 155000 90000 245000 155000 90000 245000 � 1023059026 BASHARY SHAY 75000 20000 95000 75000 20000 95000 1023059319 HURLOCKER CHARLES W+NORMA A 112000 45000 157000 112000 45000 157000 1023059191 HUNSAKER PAT 85000 75000 160000 85000 75000 160000 2739200050 FLATTUM PATRICIA LEE 55000 99000 154000 55000 99000 154000 1023059021 WEGNER BRETT+MARY K 75000 139000 214000 75000 139000 214000 1023059170 HODGE HAROLD D 65000 101000 166000 65000 101000 166000 1023059031 HUNSAKER PAT 110000 0 110000 110000 0 110000 1023059355 KELLY BRYANT K S 60000 56000 116000 0000 56000 116000 CITY OF RENTON Page 1 MAY 3 1 2001 ��.��IVED ShamrockOwners PROPOSED SHAMROCK ANNEXATION King County Assessor's Records(01/01) Appraised Value Taxable Value PID TAXPAYERNAME Land Improved Total Land Improved Total 1023059415 HUNSAKER JIM & DENISE 150000 0 150000 150000 0 150000 1023059022 HUNSAKER JIM 146000 77000 223000 146000 77000 223000 2739200200 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 55000 88000 143000 55000 88000 143000 2739200100 SIKES DONALD K JR+CINDY I P 55000 88000 143000 55000 88000 143000 2739200230 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 1123059092 JARVIS JERRY 65000 117000 182000 65000 117000 182000 1123059067 NUGYEN NGOC 55000 86000 141000 55000 86000 141000 2739200120 FLATTUM PATRICIA LEE 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 � 2739200030 MUNRO RICHARD G+BARBARA C 20000 0 20000 20000 0 20000 1123059070 METCALFE WILLIAM 55000 74000 129000 55000 74000 129000 2739200130 BOWEN RALPH P JR 55000 85000 140000 55000 85000 140000 2739200160 KINGSTON CHARLIE &STACY 55000 105000 160000 55000 105000 160000 1123059075 ENGH DALE+ENGH MARY E ROBINSON- 55000 74000 129000 55000 74000 129000 2739200260 RILEY JOHN 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200170 HAMMOND JAMES C+ERIKA L 55000 87000 142000 55000 87000 142000 2739200140 KRISTOFERSON RICHARD 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200150 KRISTOFERSON RICHARD 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200020 BOWEN JR RALPH P+BRENDA M 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200010 BOWEN JR RALPH P+BRENDA M 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 1123059091 ELLIS STANLEY E 110000 16000 126000 110000 16000 126000 1123059078 TOMLINSON ERIC D+AUTUMN 55000 72000 127000 55000 72000 127000 1123059010 JARVIS JERRY D 80000 28000 108000 80000 28000 108000 � Page 2 PROPOSED SHAMROCK ANNEXATION King County Assessor's Records (01/01) Appraised Value Taxable Value PID TAXPAYERNAME Land Improved Total Land Improved Total 1023059069 LAI MAN-LING 100000 0 100000 100000 0 100000 1023059384 HOILAND JOHN D ET AL 95000 134000 229000 95000 134000 229000 1023059383 MARTIN KENNETH A 110000 123000 233000 110000 123000 233000 1023059341 GILBERT KEITH C+CATHERINE C 60000 118000 178000 60000 118000 178000 2739200071 HOHLBEIN ERIK F+MICHELLE L 55000 97000 152000 55000 97000 152000 2739200220 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200060 LARSON JAMES M+GLORIA E 55000 70000 125000 55000 70000 125000 1023059038 KOCH JOHN E+PATRICIA D 60000 80000 140000 60000 80000 140000 2739200080 BIELKA RONALD G 55000 85000 140000 55000 85000 140000 � 1023059259 POWERS JACK M+DENISE T 60000 104000 164000 60000 104000 164000 2739200090 BIELKA RONALD G 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200210 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200110 PALZER CATHY 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200040 MUNRO RICHARD G 55000 95000 150000 55000 95000 150000 2739200240 REPENN ROGER 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200190 HALFHILL DAVID K&SUSAN L 55000 86000 141000 55000 86000 141000 1023059030 PALANCHUK GEORGIY+NATALYA 135000 58000 193000 135000 58000 193000 1023059174 SMITH ROY 53200 125000 178200 47600 67100 114700 1023059174 SMITH ROY 41800 0 41800 41800 0 41800 2739200250 REPENN ROGER 55000 25000 80000 55000 25000 80000 2739200180 REPENN ROGER L 55000 92000 147000 55000 92000 147000 1123059031 SCOTT SHARON ELIZABETH 105000 98000 203000 105000 98000 203000 1023059042 PHUNG AN T 155000 90000 245000 155000 90000 245000 1023059026 BASHARY SHAY 75000 20000 95000 75000 20000 95000 1023059319 HURLOCKER CHARLES W+NORMA A 112000 45000 157000 112000 45000 157000 � 1023059191 HUNSAKER PAT 85000 75000 160000 85000 75000 160000 2739200050 FLATTUM PATRICIA LEE 55000 99000 154000 55000 99000 154000 1023059021 WEGNER BRETT+MARY K 75000 139000 214000 75000 139000 214000 1023059170 HODGE HAROLD D 65000 101000 166000 65000 101000 166000 1023059031 HUNSAKER PAT 110000 0 110000 110000 0 110000 1023059355 KELLY BRYANT K S 60000 56000 116000 60000 56000 116000 1023059415 HUNSAKER JIM& DENISE 150000 0 150000 150000 0 150000 1023059022 HUNSAKER JIM 146000 77000 223000 146000 77000 223000 Page 1 of 2 PROPOSED SHAMROCK ANNEXATION King County Assessor's Records (01/01) Appraised Value Taxable Value PID TAXPAYERNAME Land Improved Total Land Improved Total 2739200200 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 55000 88000 143000 55000 88000 143000 2739200100 SIKES DONALD K JR+CINDY I P 55000 88000 143000 55000 88000 143000 2739200230 SHARKEY DOUGLAS V 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 1123059092 JARVIS JERRY 65000 117000 182000 65000 117000 182000 1123059067 NUGYEN NGOC 55000 86000 141000 55000 86000 141000 2739200120 FLATTUM PATRICIA LEE 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200030 MUNRO RICHARD G+BARBARA C 20000 0 20000 20000 0 20000 1123059070 METCALFE WILLIAM 55000 74000 129000 55000 74000 129000 2739200130 BOWEN RALPH P JR 55000 85000 140000 55000 85000 140000 � 2739200160 KINGSTON CHARLIE&STACY 55000 105000 160000 55000 105000 160000 1123059075 ENGH DALE+ENGH MARY E ROBINSON- 55000 74000 129000 55000 74000 129000 2739200260 RILEY JOHN 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200170 HAMMOND JAMES C+ERIKA L 55000 87000 142000 55000 87000 142000 2739200140 KRISTOFERSON RICHARD 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200150 KRISTOFERSON RICHARD 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200020 BOWEN JR RALPH P+BRENDA M 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 2739200010 BOWEN JR RALPH P+BRENDA M 55000 0 55000 55000 0 55000 1123059091 ELLIS STANLEY E 110000 16000 126000 110000 16000 126000 1123059078 TOMLINSON ERIC D+AUTUMN 55000 72000 127000 55000 72000 127000 1123059010 JARVIS JERRY D 80000 28000 108000 80000 28000 108000 Total $ 6,735,000 $ 6,671,500 � Page 2 of 2 Jt7HMKUl:K LANU�(:AF'ING,LLC 4 610 7 � � Annexation 24.82 �".�'/18/Ol 46107 City of Renton �24.82 7 , -z-s; �c , x.,.- ,,� - :;��,�.. . �n:,,: _� G x'"' ..+v�.`s.�'�.ti�, � ! ,^�3�,'a.�"��'`. ; �,.{':.i;�? .�> e.a,�: 3re�y �`�'"2'° .fr s"� .,�;'^ ':?.'��''„�'�''N�.. ;,;°'�.�'. ',C. :;,ey;*as� �t, i°'A.< <�i .�F`"� `"cdi .L,' -'�C'L�`" "''r° 's�, ',�. ��; {':�`,,:>Y��• "�4.. �"§.';: f aa'a. �:r`.,4`, �¢ry, -�:-.�;��.p ;, .� ��',£':.�,�.� � ,;G�:, ��.� ;� .�.he ,�r.„ k :;��aa�..',� s:r:"� :*�- ��8%"„:!�, '"'';�.;.�i�`,+'k: }.ry� '�y"^ s- .. � �..�•, � �r'� z" w. �;r,.,, m,` •b �� ''r. :�;�,�: . e;.. .:[� f - t a 6}p'`�, _ '?c. q� '�" '�{�'N ,�?.,�„�.�,5 F}L� .4� .� IY .(y"�'�� ; ,g�.p,�• ,q.�s.^'Js�«f: a). '*..: �;eF'�.�e �6iti+L..: Y�r.. 4 K.y,p � N �#^K��'�t`.� P;;,�._ �{`kt � . ��.aY'gY^�t j :t�c's'-i..:;-1.�,'�'.m. '`t� ^.S�r .�,F�'. �' ?r��€'�.�=p '` �,a`�M��,qS.,;F,a-'�,.. ::w�,.4y�::�c.,' ^�'!E' -"'y.c.: ''�` .$, ' tt, .._.g'� p f ,• 9.=s�.°t •.ji"'�9•G ' N�i� .'� �k��v" �T' `x4+Y4t�i� �+:" � �r R g�,� %{24 �ti 9!�}�+ t t.�...'Ap.'N '"��iyr[.3`y" a� ry�"'ic.;' . . ' .x Y. ` 't'i' 'n x �- t � ,�y.2 .s x..u.%,' �$ �S 'Tr �'y;, :�i°� ^`�"h,�'��.,�;"�-,�' +� �.s ;� - C)t�,y.'a £�?� lhro€;a�: . ' u�,..�`:.,y, �`3'2,�..�� -� ",'Cr '� i:�'.:�"` ', e a,. `��,�'�.� � c.,- � jPr�' . ��si.; �y;: �,ro � :� �t�N� �'��._t, • >�,k,w:�.z... ,":�.,;� `�� ; _++��'sya,.z r:;.� �' ''� "4 '�. � sd�i:: s�`+�'�^`°;.� 'n.•�':...,...,;,z.,'.�,?�`�. 'Y�;+4-� •v '�i.«;:.. '�'U��,,•��"t:,i��+`��.- �,. ,��'Hr.a:e;j;•'.'.'-'�'�'<"t�:,,'ttr`i - 5�� '~� � .�S` =sS�A�� i¢��2�Cce$ f`. $ '�'�:{✓S':t\ �;�; " �. : ' ', ,� ,� s�-�:',.';.,"' a�,=�; :`i � �4.,.� ir.. •s�-t, a p�"t ��,:r °rt # ?�`,�y.. - µ� fx � ;;` p`�fi�,.;r ti�y' " ,�" t� T A "v"r'.C�;i°�a'.,`='" �;. . �`•- �, �` �i �.r�. :'�� '��, 't`.'�z�'�a�'�`''y;y-,-t'� <�`i L �".'�`��%i r'c'.`i.'f.; "�S'. .. �.,�;:� ' j� ;; �� r., ��. � ._�.. �z, .s„�p ..'�a�:.�` �5:��.ss �"# x.�^'�',sk '` �.� � Q.� 'i}.�3. ''�'y .x.{� ..($ h. Y t s �..'y x 7:�T�.P Si<'..�M"r y, .',X�: .S p '+; t; � �4 y�:.r� �pp S� �R:5 .� .'..��"';,§-. �.. �es�-,=� "3'w�P,4?��.'.>'s '�` �L `'f „�:;+� , .& (4"s..•.�"'<aC;��" .`�>` ,F' �as'*k ;.�'x M} P:^'.' r�,,,st9�4.�f.'s�',„�%,$�'�. •�•• .,.�+'3" �Y�• n�. ;��', _��y`�° ,3��?e,. �%';��,;,�%�.':-' C ��zt. .<.: g , l':y� � c� S. ..f. �d'r 'r a%..�3`� �'�'. _ .�`'�� S�*"��fi i:,'�.`;':$ '.�_h.�y��°x?t_:;�s �'£��. .�q:3,' ,` a.:, ��T� _.'Jwy�.r zj � '��.� Qr- �„ a.,, .�� 's� �3x.. as�� " :;fr ,t t�., ,r� � �y,y «,?&;srk�9�� 'M••h�'.';�. ,'�'a�� '`�.wi,`�:�'.:�`'y ,�g +a:*�.�iw, �y;`'<`�.'��,.�x ';'�n:�; .r ' �`. "�T'�'�U �i F��.: id, z.v,^��.Y'�f-" C; �''- a�., ��"s.�`�-' r � ��.. .s: „r1'�-`. �:�,r.a ��-,'"� C..;_ �3:�"'�:�;_" ;�.�ir' s� �" >�'-;� ;�'� r�.� `<<s»�'`"3 :s,� `` ��• � �z'�= >�,,� �fis;�:..�,�-`�'`' ,t.d:�,�y��-�-',;'y;,:�:'�:'t;,.`.. ��a. �-�+ €: `�:>'�k�;3�ry',,�:t=: �'".,,..,"`�:e�` �-�' .`�.•. u r „�r t� ,{' ;^ a Y ' �� +� t. 'd—' '.;g91.,^;<z;..:{' °.f,: •`k��r ; tTSr��=.:.. `�?a..3f�% i�'��__�� ;�:..v ^�-� �. .�& > t',§_ T�F;,�`�,:.�� '�>,;�'��,�.�'�::r�+'"'y�. ,P,. *.� '.?�r.:.� 'i+:. 'S�4^�,��'��Cs' S� �4'� e. *`�sv,�'�s`v{�i ;,<;.`�-�".�'-'��?;�;v:=".a�, ,w�F,t�.i5e- ?� .,�:.;i" AR�� '.s�i;-�. -±;,�,t`.h .,* .a p Y� ,r. ,�,i4�'•�,�`%�!�"_ ..��;,��-�'�"Y; �(�'s."�$ pz i�.�� `Y��.�"t. .i, -"S:r�:f.��t,. �.>' _ ,s�. ^`"'w��;�$;�= ,4'"�-`'a::- �$r , +�'=�''�^��.��'�r,�C�>is�;sA' �. � i.� Y ' a •� ^' ,' . �� ;� -�t,s..�£;�_ '�:'�'�'t •.¥�'- �� y� ,.s... �'.} � £_(�� '�'`�`�:i',Y-"` .. � :� . ` -.'� ��, �:8:�^"4A`x�� Y z�, ,,r-' �f�."�'�a.$.r'�=x'* V > p��t � fZ,, `i �?' ,,y. *�; `�a.w, {,}'�.`.i„�F' ea;:G`�{�,,�,.'. .`';�r,Y.,�{g �s .'�s, 'rr y��',�»�:,�',rr"-^r,„v�s .«;Y,f"'�*b#�:'°•M,�•" :'x,� �� F� ��:.x.r.,�„ r�"'^.�,-" #*c...:" .��i49. :�'�,s'a�„�r^TS. ��;� a;.� �5>f x�" . s��'� 3 ��...� y. :$�` �t:= ��.r .€a..b,.:x.,,.�a<_��;� .�� .�,.:�=e e��'r.°i,. n'tia,��: ' �°.. � "�,> t t;,' ��"`;::t'.�y`yo� 'r �� i�fY 'r. �,�_..:.A. R'�t` ,• • � 1�'&��e�':i: ��oly r ;t= +c�,'��„v'. � a,4,;t. _'�°:�` 5t,• t:�'� � �s * z=, u, ��`� ,,, p ," ;�� y�,��'�'�i� :7"�xaL.. �-. ��'� _ ��s'�54'!��,.,�i�•�•s x..��,� ��+:�',� �i�,. ��5-��,*�:.,; .':� �'''x� .�r�; :"';�'.',�? �,. =T�`��nn. �- �'. '�w., '��;`�;: -;�t".a�f'�'k �6:'�'"� d.°^#' . :,'�Y ' ..L>•y, •'�'j�s-"�Y y . ,'.� r�, �K: �F ,.J��, N "$i`t' ,t- �.�''"Y�'�""�� '3�:``-�= t'G'.* S ��3°��::�'.�; ;y��, ��?p* '�,,,�� ,';�, k , 's�?f�r:�. Sz-�; :�� •.b;�"�, c�,S t £ � �:*>t,s� �'�%��°. i �:� y�,�� c'Y`'�,"�.'�_ '`�° -�^�`'.�n ��y'.�i's�,_$ .+ "a.«�,� . .�, .�.�L. -e.n;�:,;wy;;� , -;�i.�:.. r.,"�.t��-' t..''.� a �C:. -� ," '�y;..: � �•' 'y; .�, :°'« *.. �.. �. � • a K �i;;�:� �, s�,.as"s.�$'c'�`' ,�� r.� i.l ' .'"� n�„` j:R � vs, .�.�,;. F`p;f.r. • k. '�,..,� in t.-�'�; .:�.a �Y' "��-:" � � �,, '�M '<:a: �a�°`" ��'��,s,. �,�'.a �"' �;'�i`-�'� "'�'�. �� . '� ''az;:,�,.��;,�y�a �`=s;�,� p( .�. .�. x�^�' .,� ''x� g..,-`..- .a�� 4�ny ;,,: " `�'a;:"' .-.:-n.. . '=j.te::: ��t. .} �W. `�> � 't�. � �� k � � '.4.� T� i�:'i�$:w ty�r��s�4��`. ,.i'^ �Y„F��" .�`v ��lh' .Khw ��y... :� �� '.�.:.�8£:y,�Yx`Tl!.?'1; �� AT' 9� � >Y'��"'^ .` �-'. �•`'� .. .:�s? ��>it'".i� , * y • �� . 'i��£ .. ..�.� ' . � ' r �. . rt. - 't*,:>=��;. _ �`; r'� +�yx�.a:.� �S,�':. > �'. ..s�+' s=. �,..:..n;�.: ,�i�... :.� . .•UC7� �t°S':� ��%r�.�4�'-: '�..,.;.,r v '[�,�, ,W� =� "aa''i�. '94}�i4.."v.". �:..'"r`.••.»:•�' _____________CITY OF ktfiiTQN V-- CFTY TkERSUF�ER kEG—itECEI�T:9�—�0�8977 C:k4AY 3� 2@01 C�S}i�ER ID:K 4;#� a� fi:P4AY 3i �601 $30A^�zS�E�.LA'tdEQ�JSlf#EVEN =__------$24.8� �3�0.0�€�.�3.v58.��.4�.�0009f ----------------- T�T�t DtEE ��4.9L �fCEIVE➢ FkO�: �{�STit�E Ft3R SHAE�f�C�Cl: Ai��iEXATiQ�i ��ILI��i C�?E�Y,: �24.8� ----------------- �'UTr�L i�EN➢ERE� ��.6� ----------------- CtiAMGE Di1E ��.0� 112305906508 102305904009 102305930608 ANDERSON ROBERT L BALES LTD PS BENNER CLAY S+PATRICIA L PO BOX 353 13401 156TH AVE SE 14324 SE 125TH ST MAPLE VALLEY WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98038 98059 98059 102305935003 102305914503 102305930806 BERG BRIAN D BIGELOW CAROLYN BLESSING EMERY A+DONNA J 12035 148TH AVE SE 6929 37TH SW 14330 SE 125TH ST RENTON WA SEATTLE WA RENTON WA 98059 98126 98059 102305914206 112305908405 102305934501 BYERSDORFER DEBORAH PHELPS CAMPBELL DON R DAUGHERTY GREGORY WAYNE BYERSDORFER GREGORY A 12022 148TH AVE SE 12201 148TH AVE SE 22651 SE 56TH ST RENTON WA RENTON WA ISSAQUAH WA 98059 98059 98029 112305903208 102305931606 102305903381 DAVISON MATHEW J+KIMMI R EBBERT DAVID M FIFER RUTH L 14831 SE 120TH ST 459 NILE AVE NE 14325 SE 125TH RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 102305936803 102305919205 112305908702 GACEK THERESA HELEN ETAL HOAGUE ROBERT L HOLMQUIST ALAN D+JUNE LEA 2823 16TH AVE SO 431 NILE AVE NE 12050 148TH SE SEATTLE WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98144 98059 98059 112305905302 102305915807 102305939104 HOOVER LEON A JOHNSON WALTER M+KATHRYN M KiNG COUNTY 12012 148TH AVE SE 12006 142ND AVE SE 500 KC ADMIN BLDG SOOA RENTON WA RENTON WA SEATTLE WA 98059 98059 98104 112305903000 102305903506 102305904900 LACKEY JOAN MCTIGHE JOHN+ETAL MOORE MONTE D+KAREN L 5902 NE 4TH ST 24929 267TH SE 12226 142ND AVE SE RENTON WA RAVENSDALE WA RENTON WA 98059 98051 98059 ll2305902309 112305909304 112305901707 MULLENBERG DEAN&CAROLYN N G PROPERTIES L L C OLDING TERRY L 5816 NE 4TH PL 6234 139TH AVE SE 466 NILE AVE NE RENTON WA BELLEViJE WA RENTON WA 98059 98006 98059 102305923108 102305921904 102305911301 PIELE LEONARD+BRENDA PINCOMBE ROBERT S PRUMMER FRANCIS J 14309 SE 125TH ST 451 NILE AVE NE 12227 142ND AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 102305932000 102305904108 102305903902 REED LAWRENCE A REID BENNIE J+BARBARA J RIBERA-BALKO ENTERPRISES 465 NILE AVE NE 5318 NE 4TH ST 16400 SOUTHCENTER PKWY STE308 RENTON WA RENTON WA SEATTLE WA 98059 98059 98188 102305902300 112305900204 102305918900 SCHIRMAN MICHAEL+WOLF CYNTH SHENK DAVID&LARRY WALTOSZ JAMES H 12013 148H AVE SE 12206 148TH SE 12021 148TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 102305917902 WATERS THOMAS M 12220 142ND S E RENTON WA 98059 ��.��0�� !,2.��-�h� :�S ��'��' ��a �--b / ��- 51 b�l 1��,� �:�� r�� C��a�� t� .�� ;'`t"" �) C�j� ' /C�.,r L�i ( '�.Ji-•"�tivl Wo�( � 0�';�1 CJ� !��o S � b1�1 u°-��l "3S� �P.sfi� (ZQZ l �se�l�� s�'� � - -. �q�b � M ��''"� -�,�.81, 1 °1��z.z� ��a�S h.► .�� . �'�� Sog6 �rn �u�'� ,� �S �� h( o�.zz i S,,-�.�.-,��-► S�n`'11 . � aS��b bl�"� tacc}� � ��{� ��hl 4�aZ1 �� p�,,� ,,,,w,h� �v�.��, ��a-��i� So��y ,��i��S2� �oc7�� `►�'�,°� Y''�a� �s�� '�r ` ^�'.�'�r� .� ..�.�� S � 1 q� �%��=w�=�� s�,� �oq �� }{ �f� �"`�-,�r� - �' �.��, � u�S� '.� �''v��