The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-01-120 • Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Central Building, Suite 608,810 3rd Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-1645 Phone (206) 296-6800 •Fax (206)296-6803 March 26, 2002 , i . ,. �� 2 7 ��0� E City of Renton . � _ Attn: Don Erickson, Senior Planner ., , ;.. � . _ 1055 South Grady Way ` "'� Renton, WA 98055 RE: NO�'IFIC;ATION OF' OFFICIAL FILING File No. 2121 —City of Renton—Maplewood Heights Elementary School Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: We have received approval from King County engineering staff of the legal description for the above-referenced Notice of Intention. The Notice of Intention is now considered complete and has been officially filed effective March 12, 2002. Therefore, the end of the forty-five day period allowed for invoking the Board's jurisdiction and requesting a public hearing is officially Apri126, 2002 . You will be advised of any further changes in the status of the Notice befare the Board. Please be aware that any future final ordinance ar resolution on the proposed action must incorporate the legal description approved by King County engineering staff, including any revisions made in response to the engineering staff review. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services Diane Murdock, Department of Assessments Julie Anne Kempf,Elections Superintendent, Records and Elections Division Paul Reitenbach, Office of Regional Policy and Planning Michael Thomas, Office of Regional Policy and Planning FORM 12 - Washington State Boundary Re�view Board For King County Central Building, Suite 608,810 3rd Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-1645 Phone (206) 296-6800 •Fax (206) 296-6803 March 14,2002 � �� t '3 '�S�4JL � �; City of Renton "'' Attn: Don Erickson, Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton, VVA y8055 RE: SUMMARY File No. 2121 —City of Renton—Maplewood Heights Elementary School Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: Enclosed is the Suinmary prepared by Boundary Review Board staff for the above-referenced Notice of Intention. The Summary will be sent to the Boundary Review Board members, along with the Notice of Intention, as part of the agenda packet for the next regular monthly Board meeting. If you see any corrections or clarifications which should be made in the Summary, I would appreciate hearing from you at(206)296-6801. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Enclosure: Summary FORM 11 SUMMARY FILE NO. 2121 Thomas Guide Map No. 656 Date Received: 03/12/02 Date Distributed: 03/14/02 ENTITY City of Renton Date Filed: ACTION Petition for Land Annexation Expiration 45 Days: 04/26/02 TITLE Maplewood Heights Elementary School Annexation Board Meeting: 04/11/02 Location The site is located on the east side of Renton between 144th Avenue SE on the west and Lyons Avenue NE on the east. SE 134th Street (if extended) gensrally forms the northern boundary of the annexa#ion area. SE 136'h Street forms the southern boundary of the area. Land Area Approximately 9.95 acres Land Use Public elementary school; adjoining right-of-way Population Approximately 50 employees Assessed Valuation $5,146,600. County Comprehensive Plan Designation Urban Residential (4-12 du/acre) County Zoning Residential (R-4 Zone: 4 dwelling units per acre) City Comprehensive Plan Residential Rural City Zoning Proposed: R-5 (P). The"P" suffix represents a public use. District Comprehensive Plan Not applicable District Franchise No franchise is required for the City of Renton to provide service to this area. Urban Growth Area (UGA) The site is located within the Urban Growth Area as identified under the State Growth Management Act, King County Comprehensive Plan and City of Renton Comprehensive Plan SEPA Declaration The proposed annexation is exempt from SEPA pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.222 ENTITIES/AGENCIES NOTIFIED: King County Council Member(s) Rob McKenna; David Irons King County: Clerk of Council, Department of Assessments, Fire Marshal, Health Division, State Department of Ecology, Puget Sound Regional Council, Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (Metro) Cities: Not applicable Fire Districts: Renton Fire District Water Districts: City of Renton Water Department Sewer Districts: City of Renton Sewer Department School Districts: Renton School District No. 403 SUMMARY(File No. 2121) The City of Renton proposes the annexation of 9.95 acres, known as the Maplewood Heights Elementary School Annexation. Renton City Council adopted this annexation proposal in February 2002. The Maplewood Heights Elementary Schooi Annexation site is located on the eastern side of the City of Renton in the vicinity of the East Renton Plateau. The eastern boundary of the site is contiguous with the City of Renton municipal boundaries. The site is located between 144th Avenue SE on the west and Lyons Avenue NE on the east. SE 134th Street(if extended) generally forms the northern boundary of the annexation area. SE 136"'Street forms the southern boundary of the area. The unincorporated area is included in the "Annexation Element" of the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and is located within the Renton Potential Annexation Area. The proposed action is consistent with City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policies addressing annexation, including those provisions which call for inclusion of urban areas (e.g., LU-380) and provision of services (e.g., LU-386, LU-394). The City of Renton reports that the annexation is based upon a petition by the Renton School District, owner of the entire subject property. The property owners are seeking annexation in order to develop properties under City of Renton regulations and to receive public services (e.g., sewer services) from Renton. The City of Renton has planned for incorpor�tion of this land and can prov��e urban services to the area with annexation. The City of Renton reports that the Maplewood Heights Elementary Schooi Annexation is consistent with the State Growth Management Act provisions (e.g., RCW 36.70.A.210.3.b.) caliing for incorporation of territory. The proposal is reportedly also consistent with King County Comprehensive Plan/Countywide Planning Policies for annexation. For example, the Mapiewood Heights Elementary School Annexation is reported to address King County policies (e.g., LU-31, LU-32, U-203, U-208, U-301, U-304) that cali for contiguous orderly growth. The Growth Management Act and King County Comprehensive Plan/Countywide Planning Policies also establish cities as the appropriate providers of urban services (e.g., KCCP LU-33, U-203, U-304). The City of Renton reports that the proposed annexation is consistent with the provisions of RCW 36.93 (Boundary Review Board Regulations). More specifically, RCW 36.93.180 requires that annexations be evaluated with respect to nine objectives. In this application, several key objectives have been identified as being potentially relevant for specific consideration, including: ■ Objective 1: Preservation of neighborhoods, ■ Objective 3: Creation and preservation of logical service areas, ■ Objective 7: Adjustment of impractical boundaries, The City of Renton has proposed to designate and zone the area for residential land use at a rural density level (R-5). The City proposes a public use suffix for this land as well (R-5 [P]). At present the proposed annexation area is fully developed with a public elementary school. The school would be permitted in the proposed R-5 (P)zone. The City of Renton recognizes that, for the foreseeable future, the existing efementary school is �ikely to remain the sole use on this property. The City will require full municipal and public review of any proposed new project or development on the site. More specifically, the City is prepared to provide environmental review (including evaluation and regulation of environmentally sensitive areas), development review, and general administrative services to the properties. For example, the City's Critical Areas Ordinance regulates critical areas, describes permitted and prohibited uses, and establishes permit processes for environmentally sensitive areas. The City of Renton will provide the Maplewood Heights Elementary School properties with sewer services and water services. The City will also provide fire service and police service to the Maplewood Heights Elementary School Annexation properties. The Maplewood Heights Elementary School Annexation is not expected to have a significant impact on cost and adequacy of services, finances, debt structure or rights of other governmental units. ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET FOR MAPLEWOOD EAST ANNEXATION Units Po ulation AV Existin dev. 9 23 $3,409,000 Full dev. 78 195 $28,912,000 Assumptions: 2.5 persons/household $400,000 AV/new unit ................ $286,000 AV/existing unit ................ ��v��i:i��s::::::::`::: Total revenues .............. ................ .................... .................... Existin Full Rate Existing:';:':::::'�'l:4;2��;'��' Re ular lev $10,704 $90,784 3.14 Full::��:'::�:�'#�1:;0��:��: ............................ Excess lev $302 $2,563 0.08865 State shared revenues Rate er ca Existin Full Li uor tax $3.52 $80.96 $686.40 Li uor Board rofits $5.04 $115.92 $982.80 Fuel tax-roads $14.46 $332.58 $2,819.70 Fuel tax-arterials $6.47 $148.81 $1,261.65 MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cam er excise $0,.00 $0.00 $0.00 Criminal 'ustice $0.36 $8.28 $70.20 Total $686.55 $5,820.75 Miscellaneous revenues Rate Existin Full Real estate excise* $40.86 $939.78 $7,967.70 Utili tax"* $133.20 $1,198.80 $10,389.60 Fines&forteits` $18.33 $421.59 $3,574.35 Total $2,560.17 $21,931.65 " Per capita "* Per housing unit- based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6%tax rate £Q�t5:'::::::::::::: Total ongoing costs Per ca ita Existin Full Existing::::;::::�i'1�;�62;�'1:' Contracted Services Full:::::::::$�:�3'5;$31::��: Alcohol $0.23 $5.22 $44.27 Public Defender $3.13 $72.08 $611.13 Jail $7.19 $165.42 $1,402.44 Subtotal $242.72 $2,057.84 Court/le al/admin. $57.08 $1,312.84 $11,130.60 Parks maintenance"' $14.90 $342.70 $2,905.50 Police $282.00 $6,486.00 $54,990.00 Road maintenance"" N/A $3,643.00 $7,905 Fire"" $1.25 $4,261.25 $36,140.00 Stormwater maintenance N/A $374.00 $703.00 Total $16,662.51 $115,831.94 'See Sheet Parks FIA *"See Sheet Roads FIA **" Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact """`$282/service call-.92 calls/MF& .74 calls/SF Existin �� #0 ,:; :. 9:::::::::::::=��::...�� Full:::::::::::::::$5'�ifi7':�9 �l�ie;�iti;ie:�osts::Parks acquisition &development(from Sheet Parks FIA): �27,773.46 Other one-time costs: $0.00 .................... .................... Total one-time costs::::::::::::::�27;7?�:�4.��: Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo � �„ . ti�Y o City of Renton � � :: DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, � � � NEIGHBORHOODS, and STRATEGIC PLANNING � �� Sixth Floor �NT 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 www.ci.renton.wa.us Date; 04/05/02 TO: Lenora Blauman FROM: Don Erickson, AICP Executive Secreteary Office of Strategic Planning Wash. State Boundary ENDSP Department Review Board for King City of Renton County Phone: (206) 296-6801 Phone: (425) 430-6581 Fax Phone; (2�) ��Z�� Fax Phone: (425) 430-7300 SUBJECT: Maplewood Heights Number of pages including cover sheet 7 Elementary Annexation REMARKS: ❑ Original to ❑ Urgent ❑ Reply ❑ Please � For your be mailed ASAP Comment review Lenora,please find attache the Superior Courts decision of June 21, 1996. As I read it it says that the School District could not sign on as a part of the Burnstead Annexation since it "did not constitute the whole of the annexation". The Mapplewood Elementary School Annexation was undertaken with the School District constituting the whole of the annexation. There are no residents to vote and there is only one petitioner which represents 100�Io of the ownership. RENTON AHT•,AD OF THE CURVE I I 1 I � I � � � The Honorable hiary titi'. Brucker 2 3 4 ' I 5 � s IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON � i FOR KING COUNTY � I KING COUN'I'Y WAT'ER DISTRICT NO. 90, ) � 8 a Washington municipal corporation; and ) i 9 NOR��iAN and CY�ITHIA GREEN, husband ) NO. 95-2-27556-7 i and �vife; ) � �o ) FINDINGS OF FACT, ; `� Appellants, ) CONCLUSIOtiS OE LAW AND � i t ) jUDGNiENT REVERSPvTG � v. ) BOtJti'DARY REVIEW BOARD • 12 ) DECISIO�' t3 WASHINGTO�t STATE BOUNDARY ) I t� � R.EVIEW BOARD FOR KI\'G COUNTY", a ) (Clerk's Action ReQuired) ; state a�ency; and T�iE CITY OF REl�,"I'O\, ) : , a titi'ashin;ton municipal corporation, ) 15 � 16 Respondents. ) � ) t� � � ' � �a THIS `L�TTER came before the Court on appellants Kin� County�Vater District i�o. 90's ; I 19 and I�'orman and Cynthia Green's Iv`otice of Appeal pursuant to RC��ti' 36.93.160(5). The Court : I 20 � considered the record certified to the Court by the Boundary Review Board, the oversize i 2i ' 22 exhibits that are part of that record but are labeled Respondznts' Exhibits 1-4, the transcripts of � � 23 the public hearings before the Board on September 21 and 26, 1995, and the transcript of the � � ' urt also considered the O enina Brief arid � Z� Board s deliberations on September 26, 199�. The Co P a � 25 Reply Brief of the appellants, the City of Renton's Brief on the I��ferits, and the Trial Brief of � HELSELL FIi�1DINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS F E T T E R ti1 A N OF LAW AND JUDGIvIE�1`I' - 1 "„",';�"�"�,��",��,"„".,`��,. 1'.CO PUGET SOUNO PLAZA PO BOX 218=0 SEaTTIE.Wa 98t11-3815 PH (2061292•ltu � , ` ' ' . _ ' - • ' � [the] Washington State Boundary Review Board. On Niay 20, 1996, the Court heard oral 2 argument from Peter J. Eglick and Bob C. Sterbank of Helsell Fetterman LLP, for appellants 3 King County titi'ater District No. 90 and Norman and Cynthia Green; La�vrence j. Warren of � Warren, Kello�, Barber, Dean & Fontes, P.S., for the City of Renton; and Robert C. Kaufman of 5 6 Hermann, Recor , Kaufman & Simmerly, for the Washington State Boundary Revie�v Board for � Kina County. The Court considered the pleadings and files in this matter and, being fully $ advised in the premises, hereby enters the follo�ving: � 9 I. FIL'DINGS OF FACT , to � 1.1 The annexation at issue in this case came before the Renton City Council on a �t �Z petition by o�rners of property �vithin a 400-acre section of the East Renton Plateau 13 community. The petition requested annexation to the City of Renton. The petition bore the � �� signature, among others, of a representati�•e of the Renton School District, �vhich is the o�vner 15 of the I��iaple��•ood Heights Elementar5� School located �vithin the annexation area. I�ot �s countin� the value of the Renton School District's hSaple�vood Haights Elementary Schocl i� � property, th� petition contained the si�natures of the o��Tners of no more than 58% of the �$ 19 assessed value of all property��-ithin the annexation area. 20 1.2 The City of Renton City Council held a public hearing pursuant to RC41�' 35r',.1=�,1 2� on April 10, 1995, to consider the annexation petition. : 22 1.3 At the conclusion of that hearing, the City Council passed an oral motion ; 23 � accepting the annexation petition and authorizing the City of Renton administration to prepare za a notice of intention package concerninJ the annexation for submission to the �1'ashinoton 25 i HELSELL i FINDINGS OF FACT, CO�ICLUSIOIVS F E T T E F[vl A N ; OF LAW AND JUDGIvIENT - 2 .�r.,,.,,,,,,�.,,,,,,�,�,KurncntuJ. i t:��0?UGET SOUr�D PLAL1 PO BOx 2i8�6 � Sc."'l'e,4`!� 981 t 1-;8.5 PH 1?C61 292�1131 , i I � State Boiindary Review Board for King County. The City Council did not pass aii ordinance at 2 or after that hearing to adopt or othenvise effect the annexation. 3 � 1.4 The Boundary Review Board received the City of Renton's Notice of Iiitention to� a , annex on May 8, 1995. � 5 • 6 1.5 Although raised by the Greens and others through the group Neiohbors United 1 . ; � for Representation, the Boundary Revie�v Board declined to consider the issue of �vhethe: it' i e lacked jurisdiction to approve the annexation because it was not supported by a petition; 9 containing the signatures of owners of at least 60% of the assessed value of property w-ithin the; to annexation area. - it �Z Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact, the Court hereby makes the following: � �3 II. CO�'CLUSIOI�TS OF LAW �� 2.1 The Court's decision is based on a question of la�v; i.e., w•hether the Washinoton ' 15 � IState Boundary Revie�v Board for Kin� County lacked jurisdiction to approve the proposed ; 16 annexation because the annexation «�as not supported by a valid petition containing the t� , signatures of oc��ners of property constituting at least 60% of the total assessed value of ts . 19 property�vithin the annexation area. _ 20 2.2 School districts, like the Boundary Review Board and the City of Renton, are ' I 21 creatures of statute. Accordingly, their authority is limited to that granted by the Legislature in � 22 applicable statutes. E � 23 � � 24 i 25 i i HELSELL I FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIOIVS F E T T E R M A N i OF LAW AND JUDGIvfENT - 3 "„",��,,�,"�•.",,,�..;��,� � I50a PUGEi SOUr:O PLAZa PO 80x 218;5 i SEaiil:.wla 9�IIt 32=5 PH 12C6)29?•1115 ; . � , � ` � I � � � 2.3� RC4ti' 28A.335.110 authorizes school districts to participate in petitioning for an I f 2 � annexation only�vhen: (1) the school property constitutes the �vhole of the annexation; and (2) � 3 ' the school district petitions for annexation under RCW 35.13. � 4 ' 5 2.4 Because the Renton School District's Mapletivood Heights Elementary School� I 6 property did not constitute the �vhole of the annexation, and because the City of Renton's i i � annexation �vas proposed under RC4V 35A.14, not RCW 35.13, the Renton School District �vas � 8 not entitled to sign the annexation petition in this case. i 9 � 2.5 RC4V 3�A.14.120 requires that, to be valid, an annexation petition contain the i to � signatures of the owners of at least 60% of the total assessed valuation of the annexation area. � tt � � � �Z I 2.6 Because the Renton School District's signature could not be counted to�n-ard the; i �3 I 60% requirement, the petition did not contain the signatures of the owners of at least 60% of� � �� I the assessed value of the annexation area, as required, and �vas therefore leoally insufficient. ; 15 I I , 2.7 The Apri110, 1996, oral motion by the Renton City Council sending the proposed; ts j ; annexation to the Boundary Review Board did not constitute an action by ordinance as.� i� ! . : �s i required by RC�ti' 35A.14.140, nor did it constitute an act requiring initiation of judicial revie�v. 19 � prior to action b�� the Boundary Review Board. 20 2.8 Here, where the Washington State Boundary Revie�v Board for King County did� 21 not choose to resolve or did not believe it could resolve questions relating to its o�vn! i 22 � jurisdiction, it is appropriate that, as part of the Court's revie�v of the Board's decision, the issue i 23 i of law pertaining to the Boundary Revie�v Board's jurisdiction be resolved by the Court. � Z� i � 25 i f HELSELL i FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS F E T T E R Nt A N OF LAW AND JUDGNfENT - 4 ",,,"��..,;,� � ,•".,:".;",. ISGO PUGET SOUMD PL:ZA PO BOX 213-5 SEA�TL;.'+'1.1 ?8I11•32�5 PH !2^6129?�I1:; � ♦ ' � � ' . i � 2.9 ' In light of these conclusions, it is unnecessary for the Court to reach the merits of z the Greens' and King County Water District No. 90's challenges, that the annexation did not 3 comply �vith the criteria in RCW 36.93.180, and that the Boundary Revie�v Board ��iolated due 4 process and the Appearance of Fairness doctrine. 5 6 Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of La�v, the Court hereby � enters the follo�vin�: $ III. JUDGMENT 9 3.1 Pursuant to RCW 36.93.160(6), the October 12, 1995, Resolution and Hearing 10 Decision of the �ti'ashington State Boundary Revie�v Board for King County.shall be and hereby tt �Z is REVE]�SED and the proposed annexation disapproved. �3 DONE L'�1 OPIN COURT this��day of June, 1996. 14 ,s S MARY BRUCKER �s HO�TORABLE N�fARY V1,'. BRUCKF.R t� Presented bv: t a HELSELL F�I'ERI�TAN LLP I 19 2o By. G E�� C. 21 Peter J. E;lick, WSBA No. 8809 22 Bob C. Sterbank, WSBA No. 19514 Attorneys for Appellants 23 24 25 HELSELL FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS F E T T E f.ht A N OF LA�V AND JUDGMENT- 5 ��:,,,,,,,�r,,,�.,�,�..r•,,,•,,,,,;..;. 15�0 PUGET SOUNO PLaZA PO BOx 218;6 Se.1TTLE 4`la 93111•3836 PH 1?Co�?9?��a . i � Approved as to Form; Notice of i Presentation Waived: � 2 � � i 3 WARREN, KELLOGG, BARBER, DEAN& FON'I'ES, P.S. 4 j 5 By: i'%'� � � ��i.'-�°-`--� `�. � 6 La�vrence j. Warren, WSBA No. 5853 j Attorneys for Respondent City of Renton ; � � Approved as to Form; Notice of ' $ Presentation Waived: � I 9 � HERMAN, RECOR, KAtJFIvIAN& SIM.MERLY � �o I F 1� 1 By: `�'/� l5 C'• �I.�n ��-�`'',,� c��'uv"`Q� • ` 12 - ; Robert C. Kaufman, WSBA No. 12543 � 13 Attorneys for Respondent Washington State � Boundary Review Board for King County � 14 I 15 G:�l.U1I-��.��f.tV�FL�'D�CS � 16 i i 11 ' ia ; 19 ' 20 � 21 I i 22 � i 23 i � 24 i 25 I HELSELL ; FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS F E T T E F ht A � ; OF LA�V AND JUDGNiENT - 6 ""„",,,,,",.",:,`��.,�.�".,�:`, � � 15C0 PUGET SOU.VO PLaZa PO 6^:c?18:6 ' ScaTTLE.WA 931I1�38:b PN 12re�?92.11iS � ti�Y o� City of Renton * ►% �- � DEPARTMENT OF � ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, ��N��'� NEIGHBORHOODS, and STRATEGIC PLANNING Date: 04/15/02 Sixth Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 TO: Larry Warren FROM: Don Erickson, AICP City Attorney Strategic Planning Phone: (425) 255-8678 Phone: (425) 430-6581 Fax Phone: (425) 255-5474 Fax Phone: (425) 430-7300 ISUBJECT: SB 6193 I Number of pages including cover sheet 16 REMARKS; ❑ Original to ❑ Urgent ❑ Reply ❑ Please � For your be mailed ASAP Comment review Larry,attached is the letter I mentioned to you last week. The way I read this is that Mr. Kaufman is somehow confusing the State Court of Appeals decsion of 1997 with the currentt Maplewood Heights Elementary School Annexation. This latter annexation was a stand alone annexation with a single petitioner and 100% support. It was also processed by the City and submitted to the BRB before the State Supreme Courts recent ruling on annexations using the petition process of March 14,2002. Did Mr. Kaufman mean to refer to this latter case,or, inspite of it is he saying that this annexation would still be invalid? I don't know if you want to clarify this issue with him. If you do would you get back to me so that�ve don't make this mistake(if it was) in processing this annexation in the future,assuming the legislature comes up with a fix for the petition process. Thanks. � ��ll�v��. Ahead of the curve Mr. Don Erickson, Senior Planner April 12, 2002 Page 2 In light of the foregoing, the Board is powerless to act upon a Notice of Intention for a proposed annexation when the petition supporting the Notice of Intention is deficient. For this reason, the above referenced Notice of Intention cannot be found to be "legally sufficient" under the Board's Rules ofPractice and Procedure, will not be assigned a filing date, and will be returned to the City of Renton without action by the Board. Very truly yours, HERMA , COR, ARAKI, KAUFMAN, SIM Y J CK. LLC. ,.�'", ,;' �,. � � obert C. Kaufm RCK/ajb cc: Lenora Blauman, Executive Secretary Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County �� CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: March 11, 2002 TO: Paul Lumbert FROM: �Don Erickson SUBJECT: Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation I spoke to Kurt Wilson this morning and he is very anxious to see this annexation approved as soon as possible. Apparently, he has deferred implementing required street improvements awaiting the school property coming into the City in the foreseeable future. I informed him that we had sent the Notice of Intent package to the King County Boundary Review Board today and that they have 45 days to make a recommendation back to us unless another jurisdiction seizes jurisdiction. Such as action would then require the BRB to hold a public hearing. In this case we consider this very unlikely since there is only one property owner involved, the Renton School District, who also is the petitioner. I told Kurt that it would likely be two months before we are able to get back to Council for the final public hearing adopting City zoning and accepting the annexation. I told him I would convey this information to you. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. cc: Rebecca Lind Document5\d (A M. I 'jk THIS MAP IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF .. K.C..:•,56:•� :1 .:� �'`''`�: 'c�, ,,,.. ►N, ASSISTING IN LOCATING YOUR a � PROPERTY AND IS NOT CUARA_NTEED TO SHOW ACCURATE MEASUREMENTS . ;.r.; KING COUNTY ASSE SOR l SE - 23 3 - � i n e o T S� e . i .s $' 7 : r /� f P, y .G 7� o .r S •� its C Es �s•a't` . P' 2 � w i N(I c •� / /671.5100-91 y (ri0.6fT1aIr. 1321.28 � SCALE � I"= 100 ��.q N N 88- 2/-09 W leap a/•s' + SE 128TH ST h N N ° 1321-25 Y 3i 2i ,� sz /4s� g687/�27 X1687/615 P 0709z�93,So,7 *coe/4SGS /4lr 9z Acca/»2 �9 __^_ Erc• /88L__ ,°� SE 128 TH ST / l 5 [.63219 r �i-S - �- �;..- - ---- -Fds�-"'�.._. /Q2•B7 _ _ True 3G' o u - I ao R:Z 9B GO/• .rP 9 30 - rlbl TYJ2__._...�-.fY'�'u'ijf4 "-7-- 75-.43 7s ` B ' /2o i 310 _ 130 300.8751 100 I a P 0 L•, M a op�°� o ` Q 7J - Co°Z � n � V q � N ' � V � 1V. V ' I � 21 "'� " - 8 2.-49 G 8 m I n ^ 10 �b L4 N /510.99 M /2 1 n M it) an 1A P` 1 ' 9 1 P 9� A` 89 n` •;'�� L pJ\001 �� I �01P I A V M \ ;y ' 1'� I �9 P 58 °.qtly \J v r � ^/go•17 19 155 - /4/ .A1- /3'177. TO �)O 3 951•4- -_ I X23 B � o j L`•ir� C7 L7 yo 9N _ -- 8O �•fo 30 �+r.s7s oc.fT7S bo i_sv.?3'-J_ /.ro.9� ..• i o .87f L0/•751 p .3ooa1'.r n 75- 1 A L�7 AO W WEL7_/o G7 - 90 _ I 8C -- iqo r'1 cn v 'y 11 p M W 0 G 3/ / A� �� n h o "' 1° I _ - - _ _ o (,6 _20 W "' 3 ^ni j I M r: I M W rn Q 1-' f -- I cp 9 0 k 00 30 A C _ - _ - 93.251 90 gy 71 i 71 13 I 70 9g Oats 0c>0 ►�i ti M - 39.51 - - 7 z _ Lo/.7t P o0to 259.23 ao. >? 7 t' AC 5142 - 3 ,foo• 8 �s N 39.34 A C G s /. 7,r /� 300.3 R Q co L 0 T I 2h ,� N ��z4o Q Y Q I� a �Q' Io LOT 2 2 0 0 6 N N NI \ ^1� zoo 41. F7- "� rn n) - /60 - pc h a� W ° `90� p� 24-0 � I L A� . ooQ o w �� I I / O - - I - - - ,1 1' 2 I Q m � I^ X04 300.; i s I _ _ �` ' /90 .30'Er.++ i ,r6 _ _ o LOT 3 ti I� .�� 3�' 4-3 Go/•75- P 130 /73 l90 N B8 - Z4- 11 W 035 35- /0/.513 30 Z v N N I 116 ' so Z ao N � so 9 0 � al � TN q0 n \ �1 KC SP 881050 - 8201220%r436 I m _ -?00. 8 _ T y ;so - ► A M � v 4 ►� \ \ N �1 MN 2 \N I Pte' I o M a � LOT I+ LOT 2 LOT ` m LOT 4 N tiN al cis '.' 7 ,� i X955 e w o ti o 15 In v N .� I �� - ^I . D N V N 0, Q� '4 tl d ►°. P� I ° N o" ° h I b q 0 o Q 15P p o W d� 0 0 0 n \ \ Q\ 7 jno 3 z O° P� 2 b0' P� i� 00 o I IIZ A AZZ g �' \ ^ ^ N Z�\ z es,7 86.7 851,y es.r Bs.7 8517 Z"J600. 6-a Nee. 21' to '•W o k ti\ 215 1 g 2 Pc � � � `\ .) q O � 1 , M b 0 � w ti ^� 1 �P.r 1• � +, N 2 - 3 4 p R K o �, i ' 9 s tih M o a E 5 6 ri 7 /50.48 /70 /ooas as 76.3/ 1B • 2GG.b* 3io 3o 30 ^ ! ►` c C� ao 105 \° ofl?' �• '� 030 vo►• O 1920`0` 00-1 p 30 �- \ \ !' S� 5-k r O O f G ikO 71-50 - Q - o / 2 J' 0 3°' 6. / 7 a s `? L O H s. 7 e 7 9 5- e 1 es. r cs-.9r Ln ° N. 2/- /o .r- - G.S. as P• �_ Q23-72 C 3/. 8C - - 3 ^� y y - SE 13 421 N':.! ST o u 2 I 23.71 66o.6a� _... _ ` z1 10• w -P ^, `` „ S E 132 ND ST Z 0 ` �`t- ss. 2G 74t �- .. 7� .fi4 145- /j 3 00. 9 751 G o /. 75- .o//o d 0 0 3d ; o \ ^1 / '.�� 34.75 f G o /• 7r � 119.¢0 I /35-.60 30 30 30 .30 I 30o.87.f- to/. 751 P -300.87.E 30 p - p ° ! 1,�, ai W i O Z � 1° h Ob4� V � Z 0020 V -'� VO'A , Fi0 0 �p p 7/ 40 1 - o 1, \ I ��' 0 v W. 14( 7t h vde-z/- ow. >a M rI 6B. so dc 40, 42 7a 1i p O 0 "i I I O_400r?, 111 -10 �d o I 11 `•► c S /00 3 00 .g 7r) 110 5- ` I\ \a0 Q A' ' • \+ /2 ,� �/ C y /O h 9 Lel. Doe S I h g \ O " 0 \ j ►� i 111 13 2 1 0� \ 3001. B 7 r off%° ! ►. n M �! Aq o9 'y �� N 1,10 9 0 \ w h 90 pi0 - \ /6 o !� o\ o h �1 r oo � I 0 0 ` O I A I "7 1 B1, js • /5-w ki y ^I 4 'F P ` � i loo v �' 9 -� I N v 751 So ,y 9 I A9 4 ^n n `� ►� S 133RD. o Lw V I !7. B9 .. 1 51 `z,sd �7joST 01 396.75 O I X40 I 074 IlI ^ /7 �E *o 39-- ' >� -*_'_ _ G 0/. or P 71 40. I 300. 8751- pOelO �_ro• , tZ 00(00eoo t- Ah3 00 .g7.f 300 •87 S' I /x4 75 N B6 • Z/ -/o w 30/, o.� I Go/.7rP I Q !i I 1 I �2 I a LOT I KC SP 37910 - 7908030959 v W /B /9 v Zo Z/ 0� n n 0 n- LOT 2 ° `" 3 W W 01 W � o h �, � �t , , , , \ 2z , � z3 � z� h / � � Lor ., h � \010 �' O 19 U O W h 18 4j v NV W ,• W I iZ7 O so.j� 7Of. 7-7 1 7B. �B 77• f2 B/. SN h 77 1\-! ' voe-L•,o.i 00l 8 \ q '� /f! , I� 2 8 ry, - 3Gi7.75 N B 8 - Z /' !o N/ I 1 30/. Gr, Q - ,.lj� h Q o Z\ W o 1 o/. 751 - 2- -• �T _ T co 30 s Z9 I � -L 29 \ 27 z6 0 ZS O \ _ ^ r Nt N �y �v2l�0 V v - w d dN hi 0 t v \ � V v 0 �0 p2� 7z ^1 \ ^ cp O i0 'to-, 7Z ST so rIb \ M 32 z sr.6s o O S E . 134 • 0 t o /, 7 ,r- ,o cP -40/-7s 0-15 O-� cj� o sj N 700 0 - a o o 39.2 0 0 e�. zs. /s�• "f M 7-f so rti , C \ v` .1 -p lv 0^7 �, so � � o W w � ° H . a gy ' p �' N \ 37 3d %N 39 '� 0. � 0 \ �1, 5-2 ,� ¢ ti C rJ o y4 oma' 1 o -y`'" ' o o oP` a W 0 l� 69. fo 6 f• �S 6� eZ h 7o V) Rt' 29 ^1 ^► rl /B h 91X f 7 \ hl \ 1 �. I 70. - '''' O ' 1 fll� Z l 7 130 43 t1� 0 60 \ t) 150 ^' /� AC) z is N. B1 re • /sem- �vI 7'51 so 4,E 135TH, ST. I J- so ` h *9 E 72 I k� 11` -TO SZ rr c ti 5-3 p5c� 050 0`'2� 05� \ sq0 w 5G \ 60 v F ro' J...'... Es •nrt O O5 41 os P rV 3 2 Q `' 16 - -rz d-- �o - .49 ' -77- o • ode �f • � h � � , 6.3 6Z I 6D .sem .5-8 � ,°,1 S-7 0 \ ti000 0 I 0 ro 1 05,10 \ h 0 !o I 13 tf,0 I0- ob?� , v 0 jOC� 37 37 �� °S�0 'S •sJ a•,2`'lh " 1 L a /• O/F'o o jo ° X0/•7.1' P O1o0 .�o ^� ✓ B6- 27 407. - GIs• a�7',� SE 136 TH ST m 2¢.4e -960 703 /251 7 -' 1326 15 so N 88 - 291 12 F .. ° SE 136 TH ST o '3 2 6.14 y.71�07.0� 981�� SE 15-2.3-5 sem.. 65-a.eGo6 -" J twLtm 14 r4 t. 11 .1% I V I - Ai)L% E\*4 0 D x/C o rc /{��'� <o• 6i 7, ,,'/, .�7_ e,� (171J)7-00 r A � NOTICE OF INTENTION PROPOSED MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY TO THE CITY OF RENTON L BACKGROUND/MAPS 1. The description of and reason for seeking the proposed action: The proposed action is to annex approximately 9.95 acres to the City of Renton. Annexation is sought by the proponents to develop under City of Renton regulations and processes and to receive Renton public services. The annexation was initiated through the 60% Direct Petition method under RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140, and 150. The proposed annexation area is located in the NE 1/4 of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East. 2. Copies of the Renton City Council minutes for actions taken relative to the proposed annexation: A. Exhibit A: Certified minutes of the November 19, 2001, meeting of the Renton City Council accepting the Maplewood Heights Elementary 10% Notice of Intent to annex petition and authorizing the circulation of the 60%Petition to Annex. B. Exhibit B: Certified minutes of the February 11, 2001, meeting of the Renton City Council accepting the 60% Petition to Annex and declaring the City's intent to annex the area, subject to the actions of the Boundary Review Board. 3. Exhibit C: Certi�cation of Sufficiency for the 60% Petition to Annex made by the King County Department of Assessments. 4. Pursuant to RCW 43.21C.222,annexations are exempt from SEPA. 5. Exhibit D: Legal description of the proposed annexation boundaries. 6. The following maps are enclosed: A. Exhibit E: King County Assessor's maps (two sets) displaying the proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation boundary. B. Exhibit F: Vicinity maps displaying: 1) The proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation boundary. 2) The City of Renton existing corporate limits relative to the proposed annexation area. ° Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Page 2 3) All major streets and other major physical features. 4) The boundaries, including future service area boundaries, of all cities or special service districts having jurisdiction in or near the proposal. NOTE: The City and County library service area boundaries are coterminous with the City's corporate boundary. 5) King County Urban Growth Area and City of Renton Potential Annexation Area boundaries established under the Growth Management Act. C. Exhibit G: A map of the current City of Renton corporate limits upon which the proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation boundaries have been delineated. D. Exhibit H: City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations. II. FACTORS THE BOARD MUST CONSIDER 1. Overview A. The proposed Annexation area is a single parcel that includes a Renton school district elementary school and adjacent right-of-way. B. The proposed annexation area includes about 10 acres. C. The estimated number of employees is 50 D. The assessed value of the properties proposed for annexation is $5,146,600. 2. Land Use A. Existing use is an elementary school. B. The site is already highly developed. There is little chance of redevelopment in the future. 3. Comprehensive Plans/Franchises A. King County Countywide Planning Policies The proposed action is consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies in general, and the following policies in particular: LU-31 In collaboratiori with adjncent counties and cities and King County, arad in consultation with residential groups in affected areas, each city shall designate a potential annexation area. Each potential annexatiofa area shall be specific to each city.... • Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Page 3 LU-32. A city may a�znex territory oraly within its designated potential aiiraexatio�i area. All cities shall phase anraexations to coincide with the ability for tlie city to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban services to areas to be annexed. The City of Renton has designated a Potential Annexation Area in the City's Comprehensive Plan. (Exhibit F) Renton has the ability to provide a full range of urban services to the area proposed for annexation. FW-13. Cities are the appropriate proviclers of local urban services to urbc�n arens either directly or by contract. The City of Renton is prepared to provide local urban services to the area. B. King County Comprehensive Plan/Ordinances 1) King County Planning under the Growth Management Act. The subject area is designated Urban in the King County Comprehensive Plan and is identified as falling within Renton's Potential Annexation Area on the Interim Potential Annexation Areas Map. King County planning efforts under the Growth Management Act have included ensuring that development in the Urban Growth Area occurs at urban densities and with urban level services available. The City of Renton has planned for urban densities and can provide urban services to the area should annexation occur. 2) The following adopted King County Comprehensive Plan policies specifically support the proposed annexation: Chapter Two, Urban Land Use, Section II.B, Directin� Growth to Cities and Urban Areas U-203 King Counry should encourage most population and ernploynaefit growth to locate ira the contiguous Urban Growth Area in westeni King County, especially in cities and their potential an�texatio�t areas. The subject school site is already developed but any future new development or redevelopment on it would occur within the City of Renton. The school site provides essential public education to existing and new residents in the area. Chanter Two, Urban Land Use, Section II.C, Urban Growth Area Ta� U-208 King County shall provide adec�uate lafid capacity for residerttial, comrnercial and industrial growth in the urban ufii�icorporate�l area. This land capacity shall include both redeveloprfie�zt opportunities ns well as opportunities for develop»aent on vacant lands. ' Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Page 4 As noted the above the site provides essential public services to the surrounding area. Proposed zoning would be consistent with the existing King County zoning so there should be no change in land capacity from this annexation and rezone. Chapter Two. Urban Land Use. Section III.A, Plannin� with King County's Cities for Future Annexation U-301 King County should work with cities to focus corcntyivide growtlz within their boundaries and should stspport annexations ivitlii�a the Urban Growth Area when consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan arad Countywide Planning Policies. U-304 King County should support annexation proposals whe�i: a. The proposal is consistent with the King Countv Comprehensive Plan; b. The proposed area is wholly within the Urban Growtli Area arid within the city's designated Potential Annexatiori Area (for annexations); c. The city is planning for a�rbafa densities aracl efficient land use patterns consistent with the Countywide Plaruzing Policies and Kirig County land lcse plaris; a�id, d. Adopted Countywide goals and policies for acrban services, eravironmental and cacltural resource protection will be supported. The proposal is generally consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map. The area proposed for annexation is wholly within the Urban Growth Area and within Renton's Potential Annexation Area. City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policies and the City's development regulations support the countywide goals and policies for urban densities, urban services and environmental and cultural resource protection. 3) The adopted King County Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the proposed annexation area is Urban Residential 4-12 du/ac. The designation is implemented by the R-4 Zone. 4) With annexation, King County ordinances and regulations would be supplanted with those of the City of Renton. City of Renton ordinances and regulations applicable to the proposed action include the following: a. Regulations for the protection of sensitive areas: The City of Renton's Critical Areas Ordinance (RMC 4-3-050) describes permitted and prohibited activities and uses, waivers, modifications and variances, and additional criteria and permit processes for development in critical areas. Critical areas regulated by the Ordinance include aquifer recharge areas, flood and geologic hazard areas, native habitat and wetlands. Although specific regulations vary, Chapter 21A.24, Environmentally Sensitive Areas, of the King County Code provides • Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Page 5 comparable regulatory protection of sensitive areas. The City of Renton Critical Areas Ordinance is available upon request. b. Re�ulations for the preservation of agricultural or other resource lands: Regulations preserving agricultural uses are not applicable to the subject area, as the proposed annexation area is not within any of the agricultural districts identified for first, second or third priority in purchase of development rights. Further, the property is not designated for agricultural production or other resource lands in the King County Comprehensive Plan and is not currently under agricultural use. The City of Renton does not have a program authorizing transfer or purchase of development rights. c. Preservation of Landmarks or Landmark Districts: The City of Renton has no regulations comparable to Chapter 20.62, Protection and Preservation of Landmarks, Landmark Sites and Districts, in the King County Code. The subject site is an elementary school that has no known landmark status. d. Surface Water Control: The City of Renton has adopted the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual, by reference, in the City's Drainage (Surface Water) Standards (RMC 4-6-030) as the design standard for surface water control in development projects. Higher standards may be applied through environmental review. C. City of Renton Comprehensive Plan/Franchise 1) City Planning Under the Growth Management Act Renton City Council adopted the current Comprehensive Plan in 1995, consistent with the requirements of the Growth Management Act. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map identifies Potential Annexation Areas, including the area currently proposed for annexation, and shows land use designations for such areas. (See Exhibit H, City of Renton Land Use Designations) The proposal is consistent with the Land Use Element policies of the Comprehensive Plan that support annexation of lands: • that are within Renton's Potential Annexation Area(LU-378); • where the availability of infrastructure and services allow for the development of urban densities (LU-379); • that are subject to development pressure(LU-380); � that are available for urbanization under county comprehensive planning, zoning, and subdivision regulations (LU-380); • for which the City of Renton should logically be the primary provider of urban infrastructure and services (LU-383); • that would include those who already use City services or who impact City infrastructure (LU-386); and ' Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Page 6 • that lie within existing, emerging or prospective aquifer recharge zones that currently or potentially supply domestic water to the City (LU-394). 2) The City of Renton has adopted Potential Annexation Areas. These areas � are identified in Renton's Comprehensive Plan and on the King County Interim Potential Annexation Area Map. 5) No amendment to Renton's Comprehensive Plan is necessary to process the proposed annexation. 6) Renton's Comprehensive Plan was adopted on February 20, 1995, with annual amendments. 7) No franchise will be required for the City of Renton to provide services to the subject area. 8) The subject area has not been the subject of a pre-Annexation Zoning Agreement. 9) The subject area is designated Residential Rural in the City's Comprehensive Plan. R-5(P) zoning is proposed to supplant the existing King County R-4 zoning, consistent with the adopted Residential Rural land use designation. The P-suffix represents a public use where any major tenant change, landuse change or ownership change must be accompanied with notification and a public meeting held with surrounding owners. Under Renton's annexation process, zoning is adopted concurrent with adoption of the annexation ordinance. 4. Planning data A. Revenues/Expenditures 1) This annexation is an unusual case where the current use is an already fully developed public school site. No residential units exist or are currently intended to be provided on this site in the future. Therefore, costs associated with residential service are negligible, as are revenues. 2) The area proposed for annexation lies within Fire District #25. However, the City of Renton currently provides fire protection service to the area, under contract with Fire District #25. Of the $1.50 per $1,000 in assessed valuation levied by the Fire District, all but $.25 per $1,000 is remitted to the City for suppression services it provides under the contract. 3) The estimated reduction in expenditures by Fire District #25 is anticipated to be negligible. 4) The estimated cost to the City from this annexation is $1,536, which is principally for road maintenance. Additional costs for police and fire are considered to be nominal. B. Services � Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Page 7 1) Water Service The proposed annexation is within the Water District #90's service area. The service area would not change as a result of the proposed annexation. a) The area will continue to be served by Water District #90 for the foreseeable future per agreements between the City and District. 2) Sanitary Sewer Service a) The City of Renton is already providing sewer service to the site. b) Sewage disposal will be through METRO's wastewater treatment facilities. c) Renton's sanitary sewer system has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed annexation area. 3) Fire Service The Renton Fire Department currently provides fire suppression services under a contract with Fire District #25. Following annexation, the City of Renton would directly provide prevention and suppression services to the subject area proposed annexation. a) The nearest station is Station #16 located at 156�' Avenue SE and SE 128`�Street. b) Response time to any point within the proposed annexation boundaries could range from three to four minutes. Since the area is already served from Station #16 under Fire District #25's service contract with the City, response time would not change with annexation. c) Station #16 is fully manned, with a staff of fifteen. Three firefighters are on duty per shift. d) Major equipment located at Station #16 includes two 1,500 gallon per minute pumpers and one aid car. e) All shift personnel are certified EMT/D-Fib. � Renton's fire rating is three, as determined by the Washington State Survey and Rating Bureau. g) Valley Communication 911 service is the source of emergency vehicle/aid dispatch. 5. General A. No annexation agreements are in effect for the subject area. � Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Page 8 B. The subject area is generally flat. C. The site is already highly developed. There is little chance of redevelopment in the future. D. With annexation, the school would have access to a full range of urban services. E. The area is underserved with park facilities according to the City's policies for recreation levels of service. Existing schools provide useful open space during non- school hours and presumably would continue to do so after annexation. Solid waste removal would be provided by the current waste hauler far seven years, according to State law. The area would then be included in the contract with the City's waster hauler. With the exception of solid waste removal, no delays are expected in implementing service delivery to the area. City departments reviewing the annexation proposal indicated that they would be able to adequately serve existing and future development. District 90 is expected to continue to provide water service, and has indicated no obstacles to service delivery. F. Existing services to the area appear to be generally adequate. King County is the only alternative service provider for all services that would be assumed by the City of Renton with annexation. Utility and fire suppression services will not change as a result of the proposed annexation. III. OBJECTIVES 1) Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities. No detrimental impacts to neighborhoods or communities are anticipated to result from the proposed action. 2) Use of physical boundaries,including but not limited to bodies of water,highways and land contours. The proposed annexation boundaries follow the existing city limits on the east, a parcel line to the north and right-of-ways on the west and south sides 3) Creation and preservation of logical service areas. City staff have stated that the proposed area would represent logical extensions of City services. The Countywide Planning Policies state that cities are the appropriate providers of local urban services to Urban Areas. The proposal would further both the intent of the Objective as well as the intent of the Countywide Planning Policies. 4) Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries. • Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Page 9 The boundaries do not create significant peninsulas or islands of unincorporated land. A concurrent annexation that sunounds this site on the north and west sides is cunently in the middle of the annexation process. 5) Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporation of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas. Not applicable. 6) Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts. Not applicable. 7) Adjustment of impractical boundaries. Neither existing nor proposed city boundaries are impractical. 8) Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in character King County has designated this area for urban development. 9) Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority. Not applicable. No portions of the proposed Annexation area are designated for long term productive agricultural or resource use in the King County Comprehensive Plan. A ♦ EXHIBTT "A" CERTIFIED MINUTES,NOVEMBER 19, 2001 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ACCEPTING THE 10%NOTICE OF INTENTION Document2\ , . November 19,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 403 OWNERS ASSLJME A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S BONDED INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED. Annexation:Maplewood This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Heights Elementary,Jericho accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public meeting Ave NE&SE 136th St to consider the 10%Notice of Intent to Annex Petition for approximately 9.5 acres bounded by the Renton City limits on the east,the northern boundary of Maplewood Heights Elementary School on the north,by 144th Ave.SE (Jericho Ave.NE)on the west,and SE 136th St. on the south;Petitioner, Maplewood Heights Elementary. Gary Del Rosario,Planning Technician,pointed out that existing development on the site includes the Maplewood Heights Elementary School of the Renton School District,and related buildings. The site's existing zoning under King County is R-4. Since Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the property to be RR(Residential Rural),applicable Renton zoning would be R-1 and R-5. Water service is cunently provided by Water District#90 and fire protection is provided by contract with Fire District#25. Continuing,Mr.Del Rosario pointed out that the Community Services Department noted a shortfall of parks in the area. Explaining that the proposed annexation is generally consistent with City policies and King County Boundary Review Board objectives,he concluded by saying that that no � impediments to the provisions of City services to the area have been identified. There being no public comment,it was MOVED BY PARKER,SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLAWSON,SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL: ACCEPT THE 10%NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX;AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 60%PETTTION TO ANNEX;REQUIRE ADOPTION OF CTTY ZONING ON THE PROPERTY CONSISTENT WITH RENTON'S COMPREHENSNE PLAN;AND REQUIRE THAT THE PROPERTY i OWNERS ASSUME A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S I BONDED INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED. i PUBLIC HEARINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation:Piele,R-8 Zoning accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public hearing to consider R-8(Residential Single Family;eight dwelling units per acre) zoning for the Piele Annexation;approximately 20 acres split along both sides of 142nd Ave. SE(Hoquiam Ave.NE),approximately 600 feet north of NE 4th St. Rebecca Lind,Principal Planner,stated that subsequent to the public hearing on the 60%annexation petition on August 6th,the King County Boundary Review Board approved the proposed annexation on October 23rd. She explained that this is the second of two required public hearings on the proposed zoning for the site. She indicated that the site contains 23 single-family homes and is designated RS(Residential Single Family)in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Continuing,Ms.Lind reported that existing King County zoning is R-4,which allows up to a base density of four units per gross acre(up to six units per acre with incentives and transfer of density credits). Describing the neighboring zoning surrounding the subject parcel,she indicated that the proposed R-8 zoning is appropriate for the site. Ms.Lind pointed out that under current King CERTiFICACE County zoning,single family homes,townhouses,and/or apartments are t,the undersigned City C1erk of the City of�tenton, Washington, certify that this,�s a tru �d orrect copy�f rr � e . Subscribed a d seai t is � ay of � ,20��- �,��"_" r City Clerk '� EXHIBTT "B" CERTIFIED MINUTES,FEBRUARY 11, 2001 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ACCEPTING THE 60%PETITION TO ANNEX Document2\ � � February 11,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 51 Human Services:Business Jay Leviton,Director of the Renton School District's Career&Life Skills Committed to Kids Award Education program,announced that Wizards of the Coast was chosen as the (Communities in Schools of latest recipient of the"Business Committed to Kids"award. Mr.L,eviton Renton) described the many contributions Wizards of the Coast makes within the Renton community,saying that they have a history of supporting disadvantaged students in a variety of ways. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in '`y. Annexation:Maplewood accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public hearing Heights Elementary,Jericho to consider the 60%Annexation Petition for the Maplewood Heights Ave NE&SE 136th St Elementary Annexation; approximately 9.5 acres located at the NE corner of � SE 136th St. and 144th Ave.SE(Jericho Ave.NE). Gary Del Rosario,Planning Technician,stated that the 10%Notice of Intent Petition was accepted on November 19,2001,and now the 60%Petition has been submitted. Describing the annexation area,Mr.Del Rosario explained that the site includes the Maplewood Heights Elementary School and associated � buildings. Existing King County zoning is R-4(allows up to a base density of � four units per gross acre,and up to six units per acre with incentives and transfer of density credits)and the area is designated RR(Residential Rural)in ; Renton's Comprehensive Plan. He expiained that the potential zoning for a � public use in the RR designation is R-5(P)(maximum density of five units per � acre)and R-1(P)(maximum density of one unit per acre). R-5(P)zoning is t proposed for this area because it is consistent with the adjacent zoning. { Continuing,Mr.Del Rosario noted that the subject area is within the water � service area of Water District 90;Renton currently provides sewer service;and fire protection is provided through a contract with Fire District#25. Explaining � that the additional costs to the City are minimal if the site is annexed,he ! pointed out that the annexation would bring$5,146,600 of assessed value to the ; City. In conclusion,Mr.Del Rosario stated that the proposal is generally `• consistent with City policies for annexation,and recommended acceptance of � the 60%Petition to Annex. ` Public comment was invited. There being none,it was MOVED BY NELSON, ! SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. ' CARRIED. i MOVED BY CORMAN,SECONDED BY PERSSON,COUNCIL ACCEPT ; THE 60%PETITION TO ANNEX FOR THE MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS � ELEMENTARY ANNEXATION AND AUTHORIZE THE � ADMINISTRATION TO PREPARE A NOTICE OF INTENTION PACKAGE � FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW � BOARD. CARRIED. APPEAL Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Planning&Development report regarding the DeBar Preliminary Plat appeal(PP-01-058). The Committee Committee convened to consider the appeal of the recommendation of the Appeal:DeBar Preliminary Hearing Examiner dated August 20,2001. The subject property is located at Plat,Brad Nicholson(PP-01- 2132,2200,2216 and 2224 NE 28th St.in Northeast Renton. The applicant 058) seeks to subdivide 2.69 acres into 141ots suitable for single-family residential development. CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned City Clerk of the City of Renton, Washington, certify t at th� is tr �,, c��rect copy of tr D' 7 . Subscribed an seal d this�l�f day of L i'�� ,20 u�- �,{.�r City Clerk � � � EXHIBIT "C" CERTIFICATION OF SLTFFICIENCY FOR THE 60%PETTTION TO ANNEX BY KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS Document2\ , ,:,, :' �F �;�;�;c i��``��, �EG 2 6 2001 .. . - -,_ - -�. : King County . • ` Department of Assessments Scott Noble King County Administration Bldg. Assess��• 500 Fourth Avenue,Room 708 Seattle,WA 98104-2384 (20�296-5195 FAX(20�296-0595 Email:assessor.info@metrokc.gov ' wx�v.metrokc.gov/assessor/ ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION i HIS IS TO CER i IF1' that the petition submitted December 14, 2001 to the King County Department of Assessments by Gary Del Rosario, Project Manager for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to Renton of the property described as the Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation, has been examined, the property taxpayer, tax parcel number and assessed value of the property listed thereon carefully compared with the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to be sufficient under the provisions of the Revised Code of Washington, Section 35A.01.040. The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an appropriate timeframe, and this document does not certify such to be the case. Dated this 19th day of December, 2001 �� - Scott Noble, King County Assessor �� • EXHIBIT "D" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Document2\ NIAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS ELEI�ZENTARY SCHOOL ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION Exhibit 2 � Tracts 14 and 15 of Black Loam Five Acre Tracts, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, Page 101, records of King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH that portion of 144"'Ave. SE (Cedar Street) and SE 136"'Street (SE 2"d Place) adjoining; LESS any portion lying within the area of intersection of 144�'Avenue SE and SE 136"'Street. SITUATE in the northeast quarter of Section 15,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,King County, Washington. H:\ECON_DEV�EconomicDevelopment\STRATPLN\PLANNING\ANNEX\MaplewoodHgtsUgl_desc.doc EXHIBIT "F" VICINITY MAPS • Boundaries, Streets &Features • School District Boundaries • Fire Service Area Boundaries • Potential Annexation Area/ Urban Growth Boundary Document2\ I/11: ."I�� III�� = �.! � ��1\: �11�l� J � - � � %111►� ,� � � : 1.� ��111�� - .. �: :� I�11��1� . � � ■ .. ��: = ■ � = == = r , , �t� .w;�r� . :%�' ��F=71 �\ �IIII� � � � [1 �7 �u s1�� .0�� 1111: �� . - �� =' : �C -.�.'� =�� ' �� •� � - '�� ' ��.7 �,7.7� t� �� I� �l : 111111:�: I//�� [►� �A� �� n i V � 111111�'�� =Q�a '� =� � �G] �yr� sa �a � r��r��ei� //�I�d�� ■ �v �� ' :: �� : ��■ ■ t��i� ��s r: !"�1 � � �■ • ' ;�1t1�1�o � �11 � .. - � W� �u � ' � �I�t� � 111 ■ � � : ' __ ��.��111�IE� = 111 � �'��1 :: ' Iip • ' � -� � . � � t"�� .. � 111 ,� ■ �1��' `�_��_J �_��■ � � � , , -� �� Iru� � I� �Illi ,>:� �� ■ .. . �1111��11 111■■ 1.1� E •• .��.�- � � � - � � .�� ■ . ■ .� 1 �I�r- �� ■ . � ■ . � � . .. �i � . 11 �� 1 . , , , , .- - �� ...� �� ■■■■ i.� ��, �� - ►�%I�L� � ��: � . �� 1 •� ■ ��111 � 1 ■ ■ � ��I �■ , � r , -. w�� ., r � I/11�� ! �i�i i �� - �11��d ; � �� - �1/~��Ii'" �r .J=� r■ ��11 � �.��►� i'��■■� �� $ - _ �� • � ► �I/�� _ �i ■��■� � �� %//I�� - ��Il�� iti ��uu ■■■��I�� : D � 1��6� • , � . '�� 1��.�• � �� Ci�3, �►� ,,V� �i ►�:��,.��i j 1►� . .� �� ,��►�� ♦ �1 �� : ��,l,,��,�►w�� 1i �� ' i� ��, ��'A,�� ♦ � " �I: � ��111�� E��i��t��1�� ,. �„`��1 � � � " � ■ . ' � . � .. �• �,,��'�,��,,,, ,� � �� IRI � �t ►�� / �\1��1 � �.�� I/�I �� I��• � T.�- :�� i�� ' ��-: - = :�: =� ::"� = r�. r�� E�1�� :: ■ .. �o �� .�►� .��i�� 7�� ■ �1 ��. �� .� ��►�:y .► �� li ��1► � ��►� /► �o .,� �� ■� .� ■II�� r � �� I �• ,�a �� c+� �� ,� ,�� ''� /� '�� ,e,ra :e ��►►�� ■ � ,�� '��L�IL��CJ�� =� �Ij� '� .o �� iii ii �� i i�� ,�� 1111111� :� �: �� . �■ ��,, '��"�, ��/o �� ip �'� i►,� �� '� �W i;� �� /�``,,, � �� I� � � �lJ ��j � w � `�-��,a ��■I��ca �e� �:d �� /�L�ltl�ii�V ,�. �/// � • • � ' • . • ' • • • ' • ' � ' . � • . • • .�. •� � • .�� , � � � :. �. ..:.....:::. .��:,:. - .•.�::...... :�::...::.:.;:•..:...:..... ... . • .,.0 �� .�i��, � :�,� ,.,� : i. -. • .,� �_ �� ..;ti: .. ... � � � �• . �. :♦ �. � 1 • � �l a� C� o � � � � ❑ Q [� ❑ � � � a . � `� ❑ 0 � o � � � � a� � a � � �' `�� ' ��. � �::�.,,�.,,,,<�:�,.,. . , s�r x� ,,.. � �, � � .,� �� <v4 x.�.a. ,�;_ ° ::�:�.�', � r�� =� � ��:._�:�a ��' .�� ' ,�,��..�;'s��„x'•.r-: ��r, �'�r-'':'`:a;. ��'. � ��'- � �,�'��„� .�{'�r�� -�� F ��'�,�`��,� �f� ,��'Y'� �%�r'�% ' �` �` �.�' � � a.s:z r��Y__.� - '�� ,��„�,�� A�� 'Ts,�. � � TS^a.?��.4-�5 -A� ' ��'�tti�# �-A, �� x�� E`- ��3 _� � � I � „' -�h.#t.rdt..>,.'�t,"f..)��' /I �I `��.�.�'� • „�,-. -�- . � �� w �`�'�,.��, T �..:, � -=,=�::' s , :�"��c. �'.' '_ _�:. `�"`�.:: +��'�a. : �.,.�:�;�;� r r ��_4�:�.t,��Sry r��'y�Y,k;%`�{".��, �'�,E..t.. "tiYa� .,��'��',`!^,�»SS�s-i��.A�.�. * ' �'� ��e t -�+ � � -��s..y�' '-�n #'�� '- k � �, k`_ .'y�'.{� , 4 ,yy�' !"'� �J � � � `�S �3 'D� t ' ;'Y�5a?3�STi e � � f 5.. g''��`.�` �`+> } _ �'j � }`��. � . -{��" ��t �� .r;nm,�,e� - �c`'��,'��a� r.;� � �,� �� "� �,�'� �� ", �� - r, � � � � � a��, _ � r,�� £ o � � �� 0 _' R - 'p�'��3�'"N.� ' -.k"�;�+ � O _�,�S�5_ ��' - - �'�.y-a��^ .L�s, � - y t f 1-� ��' t-�.�'5hki��SY��Y , 3- ��#§��, ,�,. ai^'-" T... �'i�'-'�i'��'-��'`.a`'t��,.��-..�.fi.- - � � � � � � � � � � � Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation Figure 2: Existing Structures � ProposedAnnexationBoundary � 200 4�� Existing Corporate Boundary ti�Y Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Shategic Planning G ,� , s,��.�� St��s�,�,� 1:2,40t� G Del Rosario �N.tOZ 20)uly 2W2 `-� . � � � ' J ��I ` � `,J � � , � � ..�., i , i � , , . ,.-, . . - .--.... . � . , , ..._. � , , \ ._ \ . - . ,... . \ , `\ - � . _.. ._. �"� `i - - �-_ . __. ., � / � \ - ` .\ M — �- _ _ �.. � i�.. �__�.. �_� _. � / ,,, _ _ _ �. ,�, _ • � � -. , . _ - __ � .%` � i - -- , � - -- - , - _ , . _.. _ � , � - '' ........ , � � ; �_. __ _._ __ _.__ - _.._ , _ _ __,,.._. 1 _ _ - _ f _--- _� .� ' � /J ' , - , � .._._.__ .� � '. '�_� �. , - ' � ... . _. ` � ` . , _ � r,� . , �" ' - ` ; � � _. � - . . � i , ._..._. € . - /� � � ; I _.._.. ----... , ,.. � � ... ' �-' , , .... � _ _ _._._, ,. --'' _. �� ; , . . • __.. ., ._....._.. ., _.. � � � , . � — - - ---- „_ __ _ ._._..__ ; _ . _. .. _._ '�� '', _ � __ ___ � ` � _ -- �\ /— �� f- , . I - , � _ Q: . - „ , , � ��o�, . , . , _ - . _ -_ , ;. ,. � _ _ � . - - _- - , � ,__ �, . � �` ,:� �, _ _ - Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation Figure 3: Topography �� proposedAnnexationBoundary � 20� 4�� Uti�Y Q,t, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning '"'��'""""� �iSting COfp0�8te Boundary �.� SueCazlson,Administrator 1ffllflfBN8IC00t0U( 1.��00 G.Del Rosario ��NT� 20 July 2001 Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation Exhibit F School District Boundaries ; .� -�; > o -�-- - � , JE 6th St 124th �j, p� �� I E 4f St �� m � h PI N h St h St � z W L W � N > � — Q -- _� - Issaquah School - � a� � — District 411 --- — `-, � �_ E I., 'nd t =1 2n �t ' `E 13 � Renton School �� Districtd 403 � e� � Q � � Q > - �, � �� - � o — J �E 136th St E 13 - w c�� ' S > Q � i � �% tf PI. S 1 9t `" 9t I. � 1 t > > � w 4n t — — � � - � � ,�n St. � g � - � � � � � i - � R� —� '�;� �� Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation Figure 4: Vieinity Map with ProposedAnnexation � gQQ 1C00 School District Boundaries —�' Boundary ti1 Y �� Economic Develo ment,Nei hborhoods&Strate �c Plannin � J ��-��, P g � � Existing Corporate 1 n! �'p•��)� Sue Carlson,Administrator � � � gounda `•��"oo tl-- G Det Rosazio ry �!'�,--rJ 207u1y2001 Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation Exhibit F Fire District Boundaries : :_ _� - - --- - -- _ -- _._. _, _ � . , �.�"- �, - - _ - - : .',; � �--�_�� _ � -..— __._ _..--,. • — — � r+ ,��.� ;..-_�,�;..; _ - ,�.. 1 , _ _ _.. - 1:� �' _ _- - ---_ .._.. __..... _ - - <T _� _ _ FIRE DISTRICT# 10 '�� _ ;• ..� _ ' � • _ _��___'.�'� -. i__ _ �. , -'� �. . �i� � - -- !`:if' �r.. F..tw. , < _ , . _..,� . . ... _ ' . � ., ..r, :..t _.,i � �_i . ; ; � � -•,-`- _ ! 'R'-� — . - y �� . �.y.::��' - `-'a: -, , � .. - ._ — __ � _ ...._, . .... ^ ., , _ _ .� .... _ . . _.-,_.. — .. . _ .-•. { _ ' _ ' i < -5�=4-4:� �� . , � ,..�' '__' ' _ _ ... _l F,��:';T. �.^_;i, � �FIRE DISTRICT#25 -- �� ^! � � , _�..,._.� �� -- � � ' �l� - - - _ _ _ .: ._ �_. - ;., _ ' ,.. i:...�� ' ; � ; I � ; - '�� -� :.�i- ; .. ...__.� : � � _. ' -- :__ .....c. _ ;i;� �� , : -T. �_ �`__� ' IJ � � .�,..�_�,.� ;�f .� RENTON RESPONSE AREA `- +r ^ } � � ' �� - � - �� Y'i_ I ; :�- ._ � ,� -� �: ; , ; = , . ... � � , _ . - �i- �;.: .;t ! I l i � c - _ ' , '::3__ - - � , , 4_:: ��Oli '�� I^ � ... ' i I _ I '�� .�, i ' - ' ' � �:� � ' ..' � '_ ' �--- '_ .__. _ ,n � � • , .. -.--',- , - . �. . � --.. . .--�--� i , , � � ._. , . `� I , _.---� ` � ' . , --___ ._ .._-,..._... _ . ! ' � � I i �.r �_ , ,.� ._ . .._.._,-�- ..:.� �`n.w:..n. �- �*' ; . ; � i ' _. .�,,,-,�-� --- . ._. _ _�:.I..:, -- � � � ` � ^ �_ _ ; — - I - -- - .... - � � _ � -_L - � � � � -- ._ . ..-. - - . -- � -- - - - _- - � ---- -- -- ; �.: . - _ ^.� -- - -- --:. - --- - — -- � � ; _ ,�: _ � 1 — �#:° — � (:=' , '�,.,;t' I - - - ,M : i ';:= .. — - --. _ - - - _ _ — . , � , � �� _ — -- ' ' - RENTON RESPONSE AREA - � __ r_i , , � . , --; :...'> ._,.v _ _ , „ <c I : i-T > --'.- -- . ... . , , , . " � ��..__� ,�....... _. .._ — - ' � � ---._.._ �` - __........ ' _ — - — FIRE DISTRICT#25 r. .k., - . ; _ �.`� t\ _� � � ;; ; i:� -= -- .. �/ Y' ' _ __`, 'c'" '`o _... . , _.. �_ � � - � -�- - T -- „�: _��_ ° - -- ,> , -.::J._ � i ' _ i� � ..i-d� _ � ""��,.:�'.'.�,;',� ' ._� ; , �4' • i �j�` 1 .e , ='t':f' _ __� 2:�ri.�1�,.,.�� , _ •1�` ..._ 1 rwa � , ..-...-. - ; ,- I _--- +� waw aam�a • ' am ,, � �., . wrsr+� �� ,. ..,, •. � ' �..,�. r ; . . . �-,. . . �. �.,- __.._ : ��t;\` 'r ,� '^�� ..� i,S � - ' FIRE DISTRICT#25 � ,�,�;.,=.� _ ; . _, ,;,<, _ <. � ' ' - - ; � :.�� 't' � � , - ,.,. _. . _ „ - - � -- �- - - - � ''.,f�4"j '� / ' "_ r- .....__._ _ —._ -r�Z_1�- —T .- --_-'_-. _ : � .. .��.%!� _ �.:��,`.��'�. _ �,�� \ Y y — . i. \ '. ` �.t: . .., �� . .. , I�•! e _ i � �. �:' . ..._. 1 � -.__.. .r'` { "� F` '. __ .—_ ..V` -_ � ��. �,'�t=� , . ._ __T-- - - J � , . ..._....— , L ✓ � l4f — i �� yrY� I I i_i � \ _-.._ . � �.• ''� �� ;. 1 �' � �.'. .'..�i :L : � �,� �1_4'`7 � �..._._ i . .,i' ' � _ _ ` �f y _ ��—... ` � �� ; . ,�. � � ' � � .l�'�'. ��,. � ;.., `,-I � , i \ ;c ; __.� .. 1 � <;- , . - --— — -- _._ ;;, 1 � I�� '� `I ��-� _ �` '%� - _` �"' - : � _ -- - . , , - - , _ _ _ -._ _ � - _ _-,.,� �,.:. -.- _ - -��.� ` ,._ ,k ,_. _.. _. . , _ . . __ .- -� , y., i ,t I 1 ,;`, "� i�_ ---- �' .i'. ...'.. -,A. � `�' _`'' ,\ I _ _' ..�� i!' . ��<-' �! —.. . � .., , ' � �•Si v� ' __ - ' .� ' � . � , . _. . . , � i� `.�' �i' '�I"" "'' ..r . . " _J � � . \;\�- '�'� _ , . _ ,,S .:� 1.�'.. . �., . �z _ -�� - i-'.. ��,i , . ; ; <,r��.; . .'�... . � ' � ; , . .. . � . , <.� .,�. , � ._�� . � ,_> ' '-t; — 'l -.. i �r �'. ,,� . ., � v '.-. ,c�-- -'r'.1._.. ..�.'� - '_ �I �;: _ .•. _ : : , ; . .. _ , . � � : . �V ..�, . ., : .. . -. - - - _ — . , ` , . . , � � ,- ..__. , I �_`- _i , ��- , _. ,.,. . , > ,._ , � ... t � ' y, ... ,._.:. . � , ._._... - ''� — --t�, � �, .. , , . , � „a, . . , , . � ... '� ; �. - '"�� ` - �,-. : i,�� ...�. '�' ._-�f-'_. ' , _ ,"��. i'- �\ .:Y `3 J � , . � :�r : G, _ _ . . �, . . .. .. _ � . . � �� ' � �' .' ; . !�.. � _ ' '_ ' w"_' __� _ 4��Cf.l'i;;� _i : : �...L , , .`. _.:� i ' . . , f- _.t � �.. _ `` . .-._. _. � f _ . � _ _ - .�i �. Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation Figure 5: Vicinity Map with Fire District Boundaries �.�Y � Economic Development, Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � v� � .�.�'s' Sue Carlson,Administrator � '�� D. Erickson �� ProposedAnnexation Q 800 16�0 ��'NT� March 1,2002 Boundary � � � Existing Corporate Boundary 1:9,�� Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation Exhibit F : - - - . _. - � - . _ _. , . _._ _ ,. .. ; . .. . , . � . , I _. _ . _ - ,� � _ _ � 2� _.. _ a �..� - ��.� - ---. _ --- ___ _ _n� - - �- -, -. - - ; � ,', � '- --r - _ -_ - `\ ' - , , , � . , , ,;.� . , . . . _, _ . , ,. '•_�_ ;.,. - � , .., . .,..,; — _ , � �, , - __ ._... __,._ -�., _ ��' �-� _ _.. �..:� rt! _._ . � ._ . � ._r„ �> .� � -- __. ._ � :.. — - , .. _. r � t /�- �'. ,;.c�- .. - �: �y _'L. _ ` .... f^ ��', _ -... _ ' t _ L..E....... _t-':•,. �++ ..� l.� ' ..�- _ r -_�- � - L �:: . . � .�1r�� - ' ..�L �,Y-..i _ i,. .: `�c ' ' I .� - _ ' ____'- -" . . �..:"�� i �:,f'� '_ ___ : _ _ . i � �",; ��rf 4: i' ..�.. � � _ . 1_a. _ '' _ i � _ , �,~ � � � t�a � � ,� 5" <C��..-�� ,-- ` _.,_ ��`.'v __,�_ � _..... .i-�.,L.:_• -_,..,i�� _`. _..�. •�r . ' _ _._ ,,,..`:.. ^�l��l - I I - - 1=' I _� ; J ; ._s -� i ' ' I � : ._�� ,.�., t� � ''��, �'.i RENTON SERVICE AREA - � �- , � _._:__.�. �r> � r. �� ' .... — � ... _ '� : , �_,,�' � - � ' - �' i -- ., ;.1�� c, ,._.... __� :. `O� � -.. .-�'_'{-�'_'� � � � a : ' ' I r � - :.+ �;� �. r i.., i . _, �_ ,�- ,. ,` -,�k, P.. � :.�.� , , �� .r � ' ��._ ... =- , � � i ; � __ _ : {_: ' � :, : �-' ' , '� I i ;; - � _ � ._L.. -'- � I � . - . � ..-_ .� �-.�. i_ ' �= � -L� ., RENTON � �: -- ._ —._. ,. , . (, � `` SERVICE AREA � � ._. ..-.._ J!,_ - �. _' _I �_'" _ � I _ :i} �0-+�xAyzai . ., ... ,� ' - - , � -I._.. � � � -'�'wo-�-�_' _. �L � � � ^ I '___ ._: ..�:_. '_ "_"'___ - :r � .! f-' _--. I . �-.. 4_' � " ..__ .___ , � _ .' � . � ' '.� __ -� . _ � ___ _._ ... � .' . , , _ .. ___ ' _ i :. 1-_� ;:- ; „ _ _ i _ - � � - �....�-.�`,�. _ - ,. , - -- _ _. ' - �-1 rTr--r-� - _ _ . :� � � WATER DISTRICT#90 - � _ , ;` � , _� ._ � :. — -- - - - r � -- . ; _.� _ —' .._ � �. . _ -- - ., , � ; .- ,. . , , ; _ _ _... ..._._ ,, � , , �=- -- . _.._ ---V-� . __ - I ��' —— -- - ... , , :.�_.. ----�--. .. . : � .-- - . � . . � � � , . �- ,� , ; ,� ,, : ��,.. . , , „ :_ - :.� _ --- _- �,�,_�„ ,- '� - ;= - : ; - - -v- -:;4 :_ ::;� - --- ." �''1 'T � ' `� ~' ' � �� Z�:{r, #'. — � "�-7 ,,�.» - =.i��s � - i '!";/'I��'�,� i � ,—i aa,.� ++ss�w,,,�,e�.,,a� `"� � �¢ ��`.`5�y'� � :{i - _ ,- _ .j".��`'�'��'�' -I WATER DISTRICT#(� ' /1`\ •^„\;'f+ �.i:` �'� � .. _L.�i_ --- JO i J : " -, . _ --._._...___ " ._ ___' „ _ � .�`.��'��. , �.:-'"tiY� , ..,-.-_ . r.,. ` L _ �t°' +. _ "I 1. � .� ,.�� '� �""- _- _ t- j.. ' � ` � '� . _ �.v' . . .i �-'' - �' �:'. , , . .' _ _ '___ .. 1 v� l `" � : ,...� i :T �. ,::-` , . _ _ _ y _ i ��^ ��.. -j` . , �, `•. i... �`'. %,� .. f : - t�,r ----- `:�,`,=-" '� .,.-•,� �"-�,' `��':ri i s. , — . ` __- ', ; I��., �..�,.� -— `y - - � � - � ;Y� \ � �_ �-i j -- _. _ -- - — .� - - - " � : , . ' � -- -- � r = i 1.:� �" , . i : � :��i __ _ A ___ � _ � - Y� I . � t '-_ - i .,..T "��. '�:�` 'Y• I -'-- ... . I"l�� '�. (i` ........_. __ � �`. ' \ .-t � � . � ,.� ' �� _ � ... � ..x . -. l __ ..� .. . � � � ...� .� � � .*� � . . �.� , � -� � -"_ _" _. _ ��' � i .L �� , . ;,..,. , .- ,_ �� _ ,�: �,� ; .��- ,. _ � - �-- � � .� . � , � � �.� - - - - .�-� � -_ . - �- - __� l; ` ,�, �.'SF- -, -- _ , . _ __ - - , . . . ,,�. . . .: ,��: __.� . . . � , , : . . " '�` � \ � ,: � - } ,IJ � L;� :. �� F , � '. � . . • �� . � � . i � . . �� . .. ... � ' _ �. :J . ^ .,, i( � .�� ' , �� , '.�� i: I _ _ __ -... _ �� . � i k_=rTr i C � . � � i.:. __..i .. � . . � \ • _ - - - _j_ 1 , . . � ,. ,, � . , , . . ' -. .l' 1 I' .. . � . � . , • _ - _ � . � � . . . �, .-. � �� . . . .. � . I .. - _ 1 _ __ . �_ . . , . �. . __ ^r" _ �. �.. .i . . _ _ ,� . � r - _. =.� :��. __ t _ �:_ ,:,: . . . :. . . . , .s _ _ _ _ _ , -' _ - - .- r� _ �:_:� � - ,s: ..:� _ _ - � � �.., .� -• � `�l: , ,.. � ; -1ti. �_- ._:�;.. �-� - — '�;� :,,5,;?: �, � , ._ . <. . ;�*- _ ,� , . . . ;- .-_ � - Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation Figure 6: Vic'inity Map with Water & Sewer District Boundaries 1�� o Economic Development, Neighborhoods& Strategic Planning �,, ,,,_ � Sue Carlson,Administrator �' D. Erickson ��NT�� March 1,2002 Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation Exhibit F .�.�; t=: Potential Annexation Area Urban Growth Area c,�'��l�y 3�"%'�'<y*:;��_"�Af;�,:sn. ��@.��.,y�'°�'}��' �.:r� K ��xYrv < p NE I6U C " �'�'-��,c�,"�iY'�#•;x: � � ' - �'i� Z�.�,J K 26b 5 .��R + w �+f 71U ?g;iDp,�PI��;^�� tlu wf 73a m,..�.;:.r+-n[N ;�:� �j, �,�py,P } 'y� xf tle �' i�E Ibb R NE P.1 i�rv� � S MC ti�l R �C IIne p �� g y.a:. on q r�:�.i �c�ou n.i n :�: �, s !p a Mf 1vu s :Y lau 5� '�`�'> g.�° 19q Sl i �i" � y � ��E IdM A � " $ ~ - 7M . �,i a � '�1)u 3� ` � � � . G 7ti -. . ., � �Yfb'� b( � ], ' -'X 4°Wd Ri 4`�'� i "�F4 �'�-. � � � �� - _�t�- x ri:u s� �s �� st�uu � 'F�t�y'gii t�u � '� Y n�a 5�e � Yµ, f 'S W M y�h Rd e F `u - ` � x � OU A IOA1 St 1)6N SI - � .y� ' R�Y Ilhh 51 v � Y Anlm ��, i q 4.g -!c^Wdl Pa a. '+' _ � <fi �I,` � 8 �' j NE Tn H � . �iou A - SE 13oth St � 71A 51 :�':'.�21..:. ' �i - - � � � x '�, . �'.1, +. �,' . ::II:.�? SI27�H NC Cq A " .- � ' y„��•, '�� y( ' -%" - , . �g+t?..__ 6q R iI z � �4'� • ;;q'� � y� t .^ ' < 3� .��;��'�; a � s � _^) :�.5..�.��ti5?i.�S p^:rs��_i� ` XE 5 fl Y: .�` _ ..'�s`; � W M � - - ��"" :�` �DES AT D R ` ` 3 NE IU SI NC IN tl � NE{N SI b i '.:�� ` - �'1381h 51 - F g -: ,.'l_y,_,. a�. _�,� v ;; - "' "' Pro osed �e �' `�� F s��:��"..� - ..z:,�;;' P -�r�ou�:�- s �-� 5 .;,._....r � Annexation - �s�• r� '� _ ; " ,, �z�,�� ' �.r�r'7�'Yrt�.a,. HE Ad Sl � �• < !a K�.�'-�a�;e�,s'� ��'?a�°'>__ . '. . =nIDd.,�""3t.-=�,- s 5 ,c � • .�' §,� "�::s� - � "�_ ~_^bl."�::�.,y�;-.. tF - 3A}d'� ' � � � g 111'd R � 3� M'� . '�.„��:�7.,�t`.. SE 17Ad A 3 l4M A p9 ��b.=�_S 3�'- <s`"':'�',. _ ' _ _ . .-. a. H '�e� �ti'_e�',Y.�'. �a: . 4�37rd,5S�, ` ' `¢ 'T �- fi - Y 171d R� .q, ��«� '� �t �;�' :.�,�, -'n:, � _.�:.^ �a .g iwn x d R -`w`-,,�y -•'��.:%<.-,9i-ti-z-�.w -'7( " - .`�g�3Xli Sl hTxtk ` ' "S�c.Y:A61A� R?A' �V"r.3.lo �'s ��, �.�:� ,��,�_�:�� - _ _ �� s�. �,��n v� 4�"�� a�' ��"i�=��-"' . �c= ' ' _ - -- ,y.P _ _,x-i`.''-y�:��-��.i�.:.� . "- _ _pt � ' - _ ,�, ___ 4 -' � � � - -. - r�' -`� c _—_ -_ .- _�p , `��. �=y1 -� � ____ . ':i�c��Y�1�A71a.:._.'. � ` � ___ . "��: '�-�. _ .�'` n s;ma!_ - �� __ EX�IIBIT G MAP OF THE CITY OF RENTON CORPORATE LIlvIITS SHOWII�TG THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION BOUNDARIES Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation Exhibit G Proposed Annexation Boundary and Renton Corporate Boundary a 0 x. � 6,�0� 12,�� :�`� ��;��.�° Proposed annexation Existing Renton corporate boundary 1 :`72,000 ti`� o„i, EDNSP �O♦ Sue Carlson, Adminiatrator 0. Dennison 0 27 August 2001 , EXHIBIT "G" — Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map x � � ! . ---� �. � + � �� ! ■ � • ■ �i t , � �� I 1 M � � ��' ~ � �• ; � , ■r � � ------ k ' � . ! i i i i ' t � -- 1 � e _ _____. I � M , M ` Y �.��.�r'.�,��7 Y � � � +'^ � 4.��J � � � � ' 1 � � ^1� � I � l 4 e I � '\�.� •a 1 l,_ ♦ � r ■� !� ! �l i � !� �________ � 1 � • .�. +� ; i a , +..,, � �� '--o--, M . � � .�. �i a � � i ..� . �,, ?__: � � M�It � � +. `M •I�� •IYt ; I +�-� :,�. � � ,�e ' .�� . � N " " i � �� Y I i ■ "�� I `� � � � ��. � � 1 i.� �++ �` 1 �"�+ ,� 1 �i ' �� ,s -- ---� ' . 1 .. _ � �� _- -- --- • '^ .�. . i _ __ __ ir• ��.i f � r �'' w � �� L�.��, .a.. _ _ .-- �av� � wF... �y M � •,' '� � _ ` ■1Y■ � _ _ _ .d. i,• a . i _- _ ..., '�,'°�,,,,•,;s• s, I . .... ._.. .. i . .. o �ir�' `.... ' ..� � . .�, a — � ` � LAKE WA9F�Tla7'ON �a. • 1 - ,� `1...�/�...� `� 7 � i � � 1�..� .. .�.f .� , , d t • . .a.� .., •� a. r 1 '� � � 5• '� � -- -- �' l � � � � �.e � r rt ( , /� { z �� -- Y V� ♦ < �� Y• • ��^ M •� � r� R �I� � � � � � f � •r1• ■ 1 �� i b � � � Ay Y �— t� �'� s � �� r . "° � + ..�� + � � I I� � �+ _ � . i ► � �.!( 1 , i �� ! t �� `` . � �• " �� / r •r• K / t �r • �; � � � �nw r.�"" i� / � }+!� I .�� ■ � nr �0�� •s� ��..� � 1�• �� ` �C �� Y• —� , M M � �� 111�� ' �� \ �/ , �� l� , , - ,� , . �/�ii.k- � � •rs � ■ �• r � ` 7 , !l 1 � . 1 � .' `- ti° r. ` I ,� ..• �. l • � � nr �� ,� '.J �.n� �.1. r � t e � � � n� j y , e y • ti._ 1 � � � %1 �. � � � �„ ; *" •-�� r �yra 'w. ' � i .�. t+ � �ir� � r �� w� ^ � �iwe � � •■ w I ! I "� ■. ■ � -� j *' ♦ � • � � !! •M.• .�.• ,h� ♦� r�� • a� _ 1 � ■n.e � �� ♦ ♦ .r. �� ! - � � � „ , j � ,� . t " (` "!- �� ---- il i i ! .�e ', ' r .:. ,i.... .. � ! Y M � � 1tl�t f �1 � e , w � i �• �j � � � j j�! I I •"' I � �'r. '-- w�* �• � r� R � • � • .�. '1' r J +„. l� - .+� '`" • f ( ` . � _J � �`� nr■ ��"�. ' � -_.... � •w. ■r� ( eera �� 1 I ' • , �l t �� ! •rnti� ! i' • t w '1,� �. I�f . t S � � I fW Y + M I 7 , Ir� � !• i� � [w• � rn �y •�� a � � I r�J T �. is �._�___J ,w, � ' .. ♦ sy" ■�... "° 0 i� .n.. \\ bw � „^ /1''�I ,` �'n � � �� y f�� F r j Y� Y Y \ ++� 'wn 7 '{I 1I ( .. .. f+y � �..��J ��' � � llik � f1aR � " �� •M• � yl � }�. . . .. . 9 �1� � �I.. ♦ L�� Y 1 ! M� � 2; � , � . ,p,' _ liY� r Y M \ � t 7 ! w � '� � �---- � i � !�, ..�. <w. � i `� �� - � � � .r. 1 f r' M � R _• � � .w. � � � , � � f •� , • . A . . c ! J . _ •.�" � „ �, - ,.�.. 'e + tcE i ' _.� , ,_,� �� ,. � �T ....., �� ' '�-__„r�� ,; 1 � , 1 � ,,,.• ' . _ ,� � � � . �\ a"'� ,.. � � 1 '� . � � � �... d � � ,,.. ,, �... �� . � ' �! � �+ � �S 's � . �� f . .�. . t . . .� '` ..�,! 1 „ . � '�0�-..� .n � ., a r n ' �� r �c \ 'r. 1� I . a ��y ' f�� i • � � ``' � . � "',, ..�,M . �w, � j , ♦ �J 4"r r tl � I 3 M � 1! ' � � •Mf� S �� `."""" . . �,.. , , � ��.. � d •�� ■+� .r j ' �.. w n.• , r � . . � ■ � en w i ('�'�� I + a � ','l I��! � 1 �I �� f a�.m� F._.J � �.. __i �i �.�� i a a � '• � '� ' �w �� .... " ! . � ! � q `�� M M Y f �� .�f ; �• � � � I j �� • ` F�„a� �r� ! � j .w..' � �... ! e ! I / � " �0 �A� � 4� , • M �.�� . , , .�, s a , � .� o � t�,� � � , . ii� � � �� i . .� [..R E�, 7 a... � �.. ( I I i ; -�. � ,�, • e i �• a�i i .�.. a .�..�� tt�, ` �+ � . i � i - •^� ; . . . ,�.• + �' �",�. !� � �{? �.� '. �+ ' ' �'a i — '�... 1� d �I` °'��anr� ± �w� �..J � ��•�•�. ! �u1 i r •a� + ' ` :m�• e i u"�• � _ rc \ •nr� � •�.a• ..� ' �� ; - .�nw� are V.�.�.�..�.�.� �I i I � Y Y y [YOII M • ; 1 �r ' � , � � , � ♦` ' � •W• �Wt •�Mf �4� t�� [Y• ! t11Y11 1 I'�`; • � � Y ■ Y � � � I '� • ' r �^� �a,.. �`w-��' w.� � ■r• ■r. j ar" w� a LAKEDESIRE f� t � •a• I t+ � � r.+rr •�1, j � � � r ♦ "�� ■r• � •r• ! � ', + t ' �� • �r ] � � f •1Y• �, �� ' � f M E ' + \1�• f�M� Y / � � M ` ' .[ [1r/ �r■ • M � � � , 7 r .^ �' � � j ! j � � ■ � •� � E,.�...I � �� (i�] M � ♦ ! l �� , I IY• • � � t � � � A � �' 1 � " �' i ' t � ',�. � ...,. .�. i � ��.�� ' Y � 4 M - . I I ' t M [M - � ■ ��. �... i i Z---.7 i .�... .�. � -- ,.r' i E � •••• � � � a � t � ^ __ SwwY taxE i.'r+•-, � R ; —:,,,..._ ; �i� i PAN7HER u� i .,. " e =_-___- i �Cr s e` .... ... "" --___-_— � i i� y • 1 jr. � • ar a� --_-'---_ --�- � j �� ' i �N. i� • i � [W� I ; f • Y ._.__" __�.. I 1 � 1 � ... • { • M �r• � �... � � � � � � i ! LAKEYOUNOS � " � � ! � � •.�.. ■ •�� .�.. 5 - � �r• :� •r• •a.• ! ws � ■ - � �r � '��..��+ ■w• ■r� ; � M .. -__' .. � –i .... ' ; ; s -__-___-�_-_-_____=_ . ��• � � t _ _"_- =-- _-� _` : .... ��. � 1 ;1 � :..� „ .... - -- t • � � RESIDENTIAL EMPLOYME:NT AREA DESIGNATIONS Raldentiv Runl � B�loymant Area-Commenciel Q Raidmdv SinaleF�mity ■. 8�,��,�.�� C I TY O F R E N TO N ORaidmti�Optiow Q g�ployment Area-Induetriel �Q Rmid�tivPlannadNeiahborhood � $��._�.� Com preh ensive Pla n La nd U se M a Raidantui Muld-Femily Infiil 8mploym�t Area-Tnmition(Interim) � CENTER DESI(}NATIONS MIgCELLANEOUS DESIGNATIONS � c�c«N�n�«�a � CO°"°°10°�CO"""0,��,� ti ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT � c�o�s� 0 200o a000 '� � �a„�p��,,, Ciry Limite ♦O♦ Planning/Building/Public Worka - C e a u r O ft i o e R a i d e n d d U r b e n C i t+o w t h B o u n d a ry 1:48000 ,T A d o p t�e d A u g u S t 1 3,2 0 0 1 OCenterineNtutian � Center Village Annexation Review Form [ ] 10% Notice of Intent [ X ] 60% Annexation Petition , � TO : Building � ' ' = • � Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Location : Subject parcel located at the NE corner of SE 136"' Street and 144tn Avenue SE. The address is: 13430 144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: Comments Due: General Information Area . ' , 9.5 acres Street length ' : •�2'T'fi�8�tr feet (existing�, , 4 .. ,. Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (gxisting development)� • Estimated Population : � �� , . .. '. , ` . , Current Uses ' Residential : � Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation ' Reviewing DepartmentlDivision: 1. What impacts or costs would the City incur as a result of this proposed annexation (in addition to comments made at the 10% level) N/Idc ��v�LC��v�LE.� ;..��at+�,^d:��: �1TY C?!=f-;s PJTO�U DEC 1 g ��,�� ,�_"��: .:N� .,�� _. .��'-,�:d ti • �, . . ' r r - (Over) 2. What environmental impacts would result from the application of R-5 zoning (5 detached single family units per net acre) proposed to supplant the King County R-4 zoning? �lD�►� 3. Additional Comments? General recommendation and comments: v✓t�Yt,lM�� bv4�� -� f W �-�"' �'`�'r'v.`�`z .h�,,,, . . . , � : . � n . �� 't �- 3l D � Sig re Date. 1 / Annexation Review Form [ ] 10% Notice of Intent [ X ] 60% Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Location : Subject parcel located at the NE corner of SE 136t'' Street and 144tn Avenue SE. The address is: 13430 144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: Comments Due: General Information Area : 9.5 acres Street length : 627 linear feet (existing) Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (existing development) Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation ' Reviewing Department/Division: %� r� ✓� 1. What impacts or costs would the City incur as a result of this proposed annexation (in addition to comments mad at the 10% level) /V � -_.. . _ _ _ _--1 ' r , ' � +��i/ELOPMEiV7 PLA�l6�ui'�� _.__ ._. .. . --- --- ; CITY OF FiENTOiV pEC 2 6 �� , DEC 1 $ �� wT rwa�.zk"Y�-�y{y j.;.u'r- _ -�- `Y'�'.:-.i:kt' .��:� (Over) 2. What environmental impacts would result from the application of R-5 zoning (5 detached single family units per net acre) proposed to supplant the King County R-4 zoning? N�� 3. Additional Comments? N� General recommendation and comments: � � � � � Signature: Date: � �, 1 J Annexation Review Form [ ] 10% Notice of Intent [ X ] 60% Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance (�bPS� Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Location : Subject parcel located at the NE corner of SE 136th Street and 144tn Avenue SE. The address is: 13430 144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: Comments Due: General Information Area : 9.5 acres Street length : 627 linear feet (existing) Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (existing development) Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation � Reviewing Department/Division: ��l/I/BA�I��.�.r'� ,�T.-�-o 1. What impacts or costs would the City incur as a result of this proposed annexation (in addition to comments made at the 10% level) , f� � �'C� ��i�2.,� �i��Ze� � �� ,� ��'�� ` � � �F��1 l�� (.tl—� � ��p'�>t,��,, �,c,�.e� ,Q�,.�(��-C.C,.c, ��51 .�ra��n�� OF� ��'�"��J��:.a��, , ,,� , �/ A 4 � .'�.1��y R ��9 _ ��;� .�� : � �� \ v � 6�'" ll� f�/�-C . (Over) 2. What environmental impacts would result from the application of R-5 zoning (5 detached single family units per net acre) proposed to supplant the King County R-4 zoning? 3. Additional Comments? 1 l�,��,,�., General recommendation and comments: Sign Date: r.-� _ �� -� � . � � ,� ��. �—° � '� Annexation Review Form �� n � �-n t�' '�`� [ ] 10% Notice of Intent [ X ] 60% Annexation Petition �,� -� �� N TO : Building Surface Water Utility �z o +� Fire Water Utility N Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Location : Subject parcel located at the NE corner of SE 136'" Street and 144tn Avenue SE. The address is: 13430 144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: Comments Due: General Information Area : 9.5 acres Street length : 627 linear feet (existing) Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (existing development) Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation ' , Reviewing Department/Division: � � C 1. What impacts or costs would the City incur as a result of this proposed annexation (in addition to comments made at the 10% level) ��"��_� �y:�� p�e��,U,_ l�(�o�r��;�t�a�:b�'`;i a DEC '� �� A �k,a��1%'��°,';�; 4't7,�.,y v.sf (Over) 2. What environmental impacts would result from the application of R-5 zoning (5 detached single family units per net acre) proposed to supplant the King County R-4 zoning? c.� �1�-e. /�ol �� -�-�2�c2�� 'G��c� �' .� , � .�,�� C��C�I � `,�� . Ad/� �j ,/� � ,� ,C�z"�e��/ �-�'�D Cx " di�ion�l'�drrim s �� C�`� � �� General recommendation and comments: �� , � /� ��j� �-� ��? �..� �'_' � � � /�� G� f�' . /�� , �p,.�'� d'"� '' ► •- ��J�� V/�j / � J �� ,�- l2-�'c`� '~�� lC��Z�'�'� � /, � ,L G� � `2-G�JJ'LG�G ��'��'� �' �7 G'1� �-l' � C�/�G� f � G�/�'IG� ��IG� �`��/ , Signature: ate: r .=.".�� Annexation Review Form �'"�-� � � �� °'9��v�� [ ] 10/o Notice of Intent [ X ] 60/o Annexation Petition ��! �4!`4 .��, TO : Building Surface Water Utility riy� �0�� Pa ks Wastewalter Utility ��V��%j Police Transportation � Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Location : Subject parcel located at the NE corner of SE 136th Street and 144tn Avenue SE. The address is: 13430 144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: Comments Due: General Information Area : 9.5 acres Street length : 627 linear feet (existing) Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (existing development) Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation � Reviewing Departmen Divisio : TYahspo r"�"d-�o� Sys��s 1. What impacts or costs would the City incur as a result of this proposed annexation (in addition to comments made at the 10% level) �,lo -�-v�aKsPorf-a-�o� Nela�1 t�P�-�s o� c�. �l`+y ��,�rbve� -� e,ctsftK� s��'s �4�4�f�e4�Q��',�,� !� SE /36� Sfr�f-a,�' p�j ,�y� /VL l�lll�� 7G 1f''H1�-U�G,aSe. o� N��►��,��ENTON'NG �L�( ��' a OM� �ClST/ ,PYb�e ou�KGi"S. �P "`� � � DEC 1 � 2001 E� cosfs asso<<��i,vrf� e a�rel he ,s�F� �� ►•o�d wa pav�,rt �ECEI _.".�'W:'��`'.;�� z�d s� nr�Yi ivt��,ft�t��ce� V�L� � � (K�t�►� by�lie t', s,(z.kle�,yo�' , DEC 2 7 2041 � � � , � bc a ►iakc�a 1 b u�d� , '1 ste�'►��'• � �'r�noP�r�at�►�Y ,,,�•�*�'. (Over) 2. What environmental impacts would result from the application of R-5 zoning (5 detached single family units per net acre) proposed to supplant the King County R-4 zoning? ,�D Go,�a1�nt cn�• 3. Additional Comments? /VOK � , General recommendation and comments: 7�te. T"v�aHs�Oar�'afro� S"ys�cs D�v�stoti ,�as h� ��ti�s �'e�av�d�n u��te�i e� ov h o�t �f.�i s f�,�o�oosed aHhexa fieh .9 acc.0 r5. Signature: L�b(7� �//�-- Date: /� 2-� a( >� � � Annexation Review Form ��, "�'�,,,'�r� [ � 10% Notice of Intent [ X ] 60% Annexatiorl��io�� Ol TO : Building Surface Water Utility �V/S�� Fire Water Utility /�/ Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Pl�nning / FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation - Location : Subject parcel located at the NE corner of SE 136"' Street and 144'n Avenue SE. The address is: 13430 144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: Comments Due: General Information Area : 9.5 acres Street length : 627 linear feet (existing) Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (existing development) Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation � Reviewing Department/Division: ��.iL�� j �/�-!%� f , �-. 1. What impacts or costs would the City incur as a result of this proposed annexation (in addition to comments made at the 10% level) 3 j��d��% ��'`'��i- � �z-,t��/c�r�''�/�'� �y �r`r"r��-�'�c� ��E CI��F FM,olVj�S,�G N D�C �� 20Q1 �� (Over) 2. What environmental impacts would result from the application of R-5 zoning (5 detached single family units per net acre) proposed to supplant the King County R-4 zoning? /�G'r��-- �� Gr'�r�°�'�"�.�'/'7`/�„�' ��G l�'"✓' � 3. Additional Comments? /'��=s�.�r� General recommendation and comments: ,� �. �-�' �/��r= z'�,.D��Zt�'°'c�s� �r`��l.�i�'��'�i/� � � .-� � � =�� -�f�� _ � ��e� G,��'��`�� -�?C� .,r� �� ' nature: � L �e: �" .�� Y ,,��p Annexation Review Form � �'"��",,�'��v �"�� ` �` [ ] 10% Notice of Intent [ X ] 60% Annexation��t��on � ��OQ� TO : Building Surface Water Utility��5/�j Fire Water Utility � Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Location : Subject parcel located at the NE corner of SE 136"' Street and 144'n Avenue SE. The address is: 13430 144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: Comments Due: General Information Area : 9.5 acres Street length : 627 linear feet (existing) Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (existing development) Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation � Reviewing DepartmenUDivision: ��1>�G- 1. What impacts or costs would the City incur as a result of this proposed annexation (in addition to comments made at the 10% level) /l�o/�/[: ��tIELUr��EN7 F�CqNd�'6r�7� ClTy OF RENTp�y DEC 18 20�1 ��°�� (Over) 2. What environmental impacts would result from the application of R-5 zoning (5 detached single family units per net acre) proposed to supplant the King County R-4 zoning? �(f'JNG 3. Additional Comments? �o�� General recommendation and comments: � Signature: � Date: ��l��r' Annexation Review Form [ ] 10% Notice of Intent [ X ] 60% Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Transportation �` � Public Works Maintenance Current Planning b' .� �� conomic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning \ t SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Location : Subject parcel located at the NE corner of SE 136th Street arid 144tn Avenue SE. The address is: 13430 144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: Comments Due: General Information Area : 9.5 acres Street length : 627 linear feet (existing) Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (existing development) Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation � Reviewing Department/Division: 1. What impacts or costs would the City incur as a result of this proposed annexation (in addition to comments made at the 10% level) ��J C/ �Li'�;;- ��`�'�`�d; D�C ,��:�"� ��D� ° �. � ,.��_� °� �q. �-:1'q - �! �V (Over) 2. What environmental impacts would result from the application of R-5 zoning (5 detached single family units per net acre) proposed to supplant the King County R-4 zoning? 3. Additional Comments? General recommendation and comments: Signature: Date: - Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Central Building, Suite 608, 810 3rd Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-1645 Phone (206) 296-6800 •Fax (206) 296-6803 March 5,2002 �`�`�a'�� z*..�..; 4 `� 4 ' MAR � 2002 � City of Renton ; r=:; , o,, Attn: Gary Del Rosario, ^ `'"� . �� , \ � Planning Technician II "`�.. "�:;�==� . - ._...._,_... l O55 Sout?�Grady Wa.y Renton, WA 98055 RE: CLOSING LETTER FOR COMPLETED ACTION—File No. 2120—Honey Creek East Annexation Dear Mr. Del Rosario: We are writing to advise you that the Boundary Review Board has now completed the required Evaluation,as specified in RCW 36.93, for the above-referenced proposed action filed with the Board effective Januarv 14,2002. The Boundary Review Board also provided a 45-day public review period January 14, - February 28, 2002, as prescribed by RCW 36.93. The Board received no request for a public hearing of this proposed action during the public review period. The Boundary Review Board, therefore, hereby deems this proposed action approved effective March l, 2002. Final approval of the proposed action is also subject to the following actions, where applicable: 1. Sewer and Water District actions and some other actions are also subject to approval by the Metropolitan King County Council. If the Council makes changes to the proposal, the Board may then be required to hold a public hearing. 2. Filing with King County of franchise application(s), as required, accompanied by a copy of this letter. 3. Filing with King County of permit application(s), as required,accompanied by a copy of this letter. 4. Fulfillment of all other statutory requirements and/or procedures specified in your Notice of Intention. Page two continued,March 5,2002 Form 13 5. Notification to King County Office of Regional Policy and Planning, in writing, of your intended effective date of annexation. This notification should be provided as early as possible. Please send this information to Michael Thomas, Office of Regional Policy and Planning, 516 Third Avenue,Room 402, Seattle, Washington 98104,and 6. Filing with King County Council o£ (1)one certified copy of final resolution or ordinance accomplishing this proposed action; and(2)a copy of this letter. This document should be filed with the Clerk of the Council �Attn: P.nne Noris), King County Courthouse, Room 1025, Seattle, Washington 98104 If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact our office at 206-296- 6800. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council Julie Anne Kempf,Elections Superintendent,Records and Elections Division Diane Murdock,Department of Assessment Lydia Reynolds-Jones,Manager, Project Support Services King County"911" Program Paul Reitenbach, Office of Regional Policy and Planning Michael Thomas, Office of Regional Policy and Planning Form 13 o �`�' `� �- � �� RECEIPT N° 56402 � � M t � � ! V' YL ZW � �r r Received From o'� � � U L� , � w �'O Address � � � ."n =� C'} T� ''1 s �J l.." �� C� ._) � � Amount ,�—� �� o �' � 7 '� J {`�Ci= � . �� r� � �� CaSh �� Q o � Y� �m W N Check , -� --- � L� �'� �--% Re erenc O V .�'�`^� �,,� 'V '� � Other e . , �gnatur :�.��a�.,.., _..��, ��_. �.: ��' � MAR 1 3 2002 �i:rJNOMIC DEVFl,(i�t,!c��T NF IGf-i80R�{pC.�',, ��RP,TEGiG i��,�,. . EA�/1 �fi�ttEl� � Ct?MMiTTEE , RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Committee has issued a , Determination of Non-Significance Barbara Alther, first duly swom on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the for the following project under the ; authority of the Renton Municipal � SOUTH COiJNTY JOURNAL Code. 600 S.Washington Avenue,Kent,Washington 98032 M A P L E W 0 0 D H E I G H T S ELEMENTARY ANNEXATION ! a daily newspaper published seven(7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of LUA-01-120,A,ECF , general publication and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of Nonproject action: Proposal publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a daily would supplant existing R-4 King newspaper in Kent, King County,Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a Counry zoning with R-5 Renton legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. zOflltlg upon annexaiion of the The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County Journal(and properry included in the proposed not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers during the below Maplewood Heights Elementary stated period. The annexed notice, a Annexation. The USeS and Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation densities allowed under existing King County zoning are generally as published on: 1/21/02 consistent with uses a�d densities allowed under the praposed R-5 , The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$110.63, charged to �p� Z�, �� Acct. No. 8051067. �� g � � �, The cost above includes a$6.00 fee for the printing of the affidavits. 1'� Stf�t �f }q4�t I�BtN� SE. The annexation area Legal Number 9951 , (Maplewood Height9lElem ntary School)and atljacent right-of-way Legal Clerk, South County Journal Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing � � on or before 5:00 PM February 4,I Subscribed and sworn before me on this�'e` ay of�, 2002 2002. Appeals must be filetl in� � \`\``L��t��rrfF�� writing together with the required , � $75.00 application fee with: Hearing `� �* , :,��'f�;�yl��,�� Notary Public of t e State of ashington Examiner, Ciry of Renton, 1055 ��:.� � ��F�c� residing in Renton South Grady Way, Renton, WA' ;,�: , r„; ;N o King County,Washington gg055. Appeafs to the Examiner are = �-- -- = governed by City of Renton = � •` = Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. . � . Additional information regarding the i 4n, ' . _ _ ��a 'o.;�',� �: ^ s , 't°•"�'�,e�`` appeal process may be obtainetl 'BO�,��r. ,= ;;��e?e�°� from the Renton City Clerk's Office, ', ea�aso s a d►ee° (425)-430-6510. Published in the South County ,�n�J�►uary 21,20Q2.9851 � � i CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AF�IDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the�_day of �r�,c�uc v� , 2002, I deposited in the mails of the United � States, a sealed en,v elope containing . 1��17�� t� F YL� �;-�c �r ►�.��u1� ;�—i L�� documents. This information was sent to: Name Rearesentin4 L% 'lR.d / � (Signature of Sender) %'� �^ `? STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that �,� � � G �Ctirrt� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: • f�� ' `Z- �� 1u�f! ��iv� L�� ,��,•..';P; �, a� Notary Publi and for the State of Wa ington �a, ��.��.�`� K,��s��° � ��' ��L9� �; ;�..: : � .n Notary(Print) �� ' �+��s��`��G�� My appointment e i ' COf�i61�E��i r��:X�I�� Jt�P�� ;�, 20�3 Project Name: ,�n )�� . �Y� � W�: � (/ Gt � C� . G Project Number: (�l.( 1'� �'�' � (� � /— — NOTARY.DOC Smooth Feed SheetsT"' �,v�-�� Use template for 5160� � � � 084710007703 084710007307 15230�912601 BARDSLEY DEBRA M BRENDEN ROGER BROMILEY JANEE MARA BARDSLEY JOSEPH P 13224 144TH SE 13621 144TH AVE SE 13309 146TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 152305916701 084710009006 059340003009 DOWNS JOAN M FACILITIES &OPERATIONS CTR HEIDE ROBERT L 13611 144TH AVE SE OFFICE OF THE EXECUTNE DIR 13628 143RD AVE SE RENTON WA 300 SW 7TH 5T RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98055 98059 084710014006 152305905506 152305910605 KAMPHAUS HENRY B &DIANE L KING COUNTY KRIEG JOHN C JR 14714 SE 145TH PL 500 K C ADMIN BLDG 13617 144TH AVE SE RENTON WA SEATTLE WA RENTON WA 98059 98104 98059 084710008107 084710008008 084710007604 MARUI SHIGEKI NIGHT RONALD R&7ANICE A NOYOLA LARRY+JUANA C 624 MOTOMACHI-DORI 4 CHOME P O BOX 6 13226 144TH AVE SE CHUO-K RENTON WA RENTON WA KOBE JAPAN 98057 98059 �� 059340001003 059340002001 084710011507 RATHER ROBERT J+SUSAN R RUTHERFORD FRANK W SMITH JOSEPH A&KATHY L 14241 SE 136TH 13620 143RD SE PO BOX 24792 RENTON WA RENTON WA SEATTLE WA 98059 98059 98124 084710010004 152305910506 084710007505 TARANTOLA JOSEPH&LORNA VERVAIR LINDA A WOFFORD WILLIAM E 5610 SE 2ND PL 14325 SE 136TH ST 13323 146TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 Tracy Romero STEVE BECK 14415 SE 132nd St. 4735 NE 4TH ST Renton,WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 �1� AVERYo Address Labets Laser 5160� `�rr �'' , CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the�.2_day of ;� �21�1�L�� , 2002, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed en elope containing S.r� l�� -Fc,v�.f i t��v� documents. This information was sent to: Name Rearesentinp �� k%C� (�� A �� (Signature of Sender) � � STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that �Il��Y{� ��-��Gc.� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated•� � ` : _0 �_. � � 1 � �h�:�� • �` �``��4 � Notary Pub ic in d f�or the State of Wash on ��;��°�d'� �G�,��t�� r�' t �� s ��.�� : ��a;.�t.aw�r';°� Mi ��```��f�� Notary(Print) ��LYN KAMCHF�F ' ��E��'�Hl�� MY apPointme i . E�EXPIRES:6-29.03 CC��111��1�1� ��;'�:�:� JUR��, ��3 ��.�. Project Name: . �� G' cL� `� f S ` Lv c L ' Cc C1 i�l Project Number: L-�-Z l� J ' - r Z l�, . ;1� � -L f;' . NOTARY.DOC �" � AGENCY(DOE)LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology Larry Fisher Mr. Rod Malcom, Fisheries Environmental Review Section WA Dpt. Of Fish &Wildlife Muckleshoot Indian Tribe PO Box 47703 C/o Dept. of Ecology 39015— 172"d Avenue SE Olympia,WA 98504-7703 3190—160'h Ave. SE Auburn, WA 98092 Beilevue, WA 98008 WSDOT Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Mr. David Dietzman King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 14235 Ambaum Blvd. SW—Front A Dept. of Natural Resources PO Box 330310 Burien,WA 98166 PO Box 47015 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 OI m ia, WA 98504-7015 US Army Corp. of Engineers Ms. Shirley Marroquin Eric Swennson Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Seattle Public Utilities PO Box C-3755 KC Wastewater Treatment Division 710—2"d Avenue, 10�h Floor Seattle,WA 98124 201 South Jackson St, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle,WA 98104 Attn: SEPA Reviewer Seattle,WA 98104-3855 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72"� Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle,WA 98059 Kent,WA 98032-5895 Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga Metro Environmental Planning PSE—Municipal Land Planner KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868 201 South Jackson Street Ms: XRD-01 W Seattle,WA 98104 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Last printed 11/19/01 11:34 AM �w wr✓ ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION MAPLEWOO�HEI6HTS EIEMENTARY ANNEXATION LUA-01•120,R,A,ECF Nonpro�ect acllon:Proposal wou�d supplent exisling R-4 King County zoning with R•5 Renton zoning upon annexation of the property included In the proposed Maplewood Heights Elementery AnnexaGon. The usea and denelties allowed under exleGng Kl�g County zoning are generally coneistent with usea and densitlea allowed undet the propoaed R•5(P)zone.Subject percel is localed at the NE corner of SE 136'" Sheet end 144�Avenue SE.The annexetion area inGudea a single parce�(Maplewood Heiphis Elemenlary School)end adJecent right-of-wey. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT AbVEFtSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals ot the envlronmental determinatlon must be flled ln wrlting on or before 5:00 PM February 4, 2002. Appeals must be flled In writlng together with the required$75.00 application fee wlth:Hearing Examiner,Clty of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by C{ty of Renton Municipal Code Sectlon 4-8-110. Additional informatton regarding the appeal proceas may be obtalned from the Renton City Clerk's Off{ce,(425)-430�8510. un s z� q 0 � �ts xt n s� x - i e t. xu � � � i i � � � s � � Proposed Maplewood Helghts Elem.Mnexation ��.„ Exhlbit 1:Vicinity Map _�^� o�soo waw.• l:R6mFJYED ��rw..-...w.�... �_��, ' FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-6597. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Piease Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper flle Identificatfon. CERTIFICATION �� r� I, t� Lr.�,-�u��rr�..:.-.: , hereby certify that � copies of the above document were posted by me in � conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on �a i �%--" 1 �;� ��.��---. ' Signed:�Y � ►ti G�� ATTEST: Subscribed a worn before me,a Notary Public,in and for the Sta�j of �as,�iin�ton�residing i � ,on the ) 7,`M day of �—.a ,1►-• ��}- 4 A V . . .�.,� i � � �. .,•i n.1fl�c,�, ,. �� F�:�'^ � �AOARILYN KAMCHEFF � . �d ., , � , ti,�a�k�n�m o v,,,fl �",. ?NY APPOi ,. '„. ,agn��,, . � �N NTMENT EXPIRES:&29-03 ��1, 0.�iYiY'� ,,± i: a ;,"'J!'fi; , a �..,. � 9 . y�� C��I�/�n�;i+i,�w�:. ' �� , y �� F� 6�1...aA ,. �,. i �, ��^��,1 YJ �'. r�` �.'�:r.e:N)'-�+'�Il(��Y�O a � CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: January 11,2002 TO: Rebecca Lind FROM: Ron Straka��—' SUBJECT: Maplewood Heights Elementary 60% Annexation Petition Comments The following are the Surface Water Utility review comments on the proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary 60% Annexation Petition. , 1 l. What impacts or costs would the City,�icur as a result of this proposed anneaation (in addition to comments made at the 10% level)? Tl�e existing drainage infrastructure witl�in tl�e proposed annexation area consists of approximately 105 linear feet of 12" CPEP storm pipe, Sl0 linear feet of 18" CPEP storm pipe, 5 Type 1 catch basins and 550 linear feet of ditch. The annual maintenance cost associated with maintaining the e�isting drainage infrastructure, assuming maintenance is needed once every five years, is estimated to be approximately $1,266 per year, as shown below: TYPE OF SIZES NUMBER UNIT COST TOTAL AVERAGE FACILITY (Maint. COST ANNUAL Only) COST Pipe 12"& 18" 615 L.F. $0.34/L.F. $209 $42/yr Catch Basins Type I 5 $14.17 Each $71 $14/yr Ditches 1-2 ft. deep 550 L.F. $11/L.F. $6,050 $1,210/yr TOTAL: $6,330 $1,266/yr Note: Costs are based upon a 5-year, average cost information provided by the City's Maintenance Division. The drainage from the area discharges into a ditch along the north side of SE 136`�' St., wllich I�as downstream capacity problems. The ditch then flows into the East Fork of Maplewood Creek where there do exist erosion problems. The 18"storm system crossing at the intersection of SE 144'�' St. & SE 136t�' St. is outside of the proposed annexation area, but may have capacity problems due to the downstream ditch and grade of the pipe. The estimated Surface Water Utility rate revenue that will be generated from the proposed annexatiou area is approximately$4,000 per year. , r ♦ 1/�1/GOOG Page 2 of 2 2. What environmental impacts would result from the application of R-5 zoning (5 detached single family units per net acre)proposed to supplant the King County R-4 zoning? The site is already developed as a scl�ool and, therefore, no additional environmental impacts would result from the annexation since the site is already highly developed. Approximately 52% of the site area is currently covered by impervious surfaces. It is unclear as to why the annexation area would be zoned Residential when the entire area's current use is a school. 3. Additional Comments? Future development or re-development within the proposed annexation area should be required to comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual and level 2 flow control or the 2001 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Wasl�ington. cc: Gregg Zimmerman Lys Hornsby Jack Crumiey li:\DI VI SION.S\UTILITIG.S\DOCS�2002�2002-013.doc\RJS\tb - � a +t • • � " Annexation Review Form � �F�, "�,'��,,, t,, „�6, '�'�� °� [ ] 10% Notice of Intent [ X ] 60% Annexation�t��n �o� C� � TO : B�eding �/ter UtWtyer Utility `r'�� Parks Wastewater Utility � Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Location : Subject parcel located at the NE corner of SE 136th Street and 144`n Avenue SE. The address is: 13430 144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: Comments Due: General Information Area : 9.5 acres Street length : 627 linear feet (existing) Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (existing development) Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation � Reviewing Department/Division: �r�— ��-�- � `� 1. What impacts or costs would the City incur as a result of this proposed annexation (in addition to comments made at the 10% level) ��c c`(iF�c, [�(a.A �r,,n-t �►7�-' 1 a��'�o� CITyo��d1sv�; D�G , � ��:�1 �~��¢�� o�er> �.� � 2. What environmental impacts would result from the application of R-5 zoning (5 detached single family units per net acre) proposed to supplant the King County R-4 zoning? �e,� �z�,�� / Cr'�.,�-�..� 3. Additional Comments? General recommendation and comments: �'✓�.�'� �/-� '�- Signature: Date: � �� ' . � . � 2100 ADMINISTRATION RECEiV�D DEC ) 3 2001 Chief Administrative Officer Econ,oM�coe�e�oPMEN-r, , AND ST�RA EGRC P�a�lyNiNG The Superintendent is the chief executive of the school district and is empowered to manage the district within the limits of established Board policy and statutory requirements applicable to the operation of public schools. In the absence of established policy, the Superintendent may act at his/her own discretion within statutory limits. The Superintendent shall , under the authority vested in him/her by the Board, supervise all of the public schools. This shall include all phases of school district operations. The Superintendent, in his/her discretion, may delegate to other school personnel , the exercise of any powers and the discharge of any duties imposed upon the Superintendent by this authority or by vote of the Board. The delegation of power or duty, however, shall not relieve the Superintendent of responsibility for the action taken under such delegation. � � POLICY RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT N0. 403 ADOPTED: February 17, 1977 Renton, Washington # , ' , PETITION TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 REC�� D (60% Petition—Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation) DEC 1 3 2001 TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 1055 South Grady Way NEIGHBORNOoo�. Renton, WA 98055 AND STRATEGIC PLA't�N;:�� The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60%) in value according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of real property located contiguous to the City of Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of this petition. In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14.120 on November 19, 2001. The City Council then deternuned that the City would accept the proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree to: (1) Submit the 10% Notice of Intent Petition as an intent to annex; (2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the subject property; (3) Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan designations as they affect the subject property; and (4) Assume their proportional share of the pre-existing City bonded indebtedness. all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. WHEREFORE, the undersigned property owners petition the City Council and ask: (a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and (b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the above described territory to become part of the City of Renton, Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force, and to receive City public services. Page 1 of 2 S . ' . f This two page form is one of a number of identical forms which comprise one petition seeking the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton,Washington as above stated, and may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures. WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement,shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.) Tax Lot Legal No. Signature and Mailing Description Date Printed Name Address (Lot,Bloc,Plat,Assessor's No.or other) /�l��B-Uiu.� '� 1. ,�j�jo> ,�., r��n��, W� � c��l »oo�� t�o%rPs � �6,d o s 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Page 2 of 2 I � ` � „ CITY OF RENTON ..�L �,conomic Development, Neighborhoods and Planning J e Tanner,Mayor Susan Carlson,Administrator RECEIVED ��; a.r '01 oFF•e.[ ilf rHE SU PER W TENpEfV7 November 28, 2001 ATTN: Dr. Dolores Gibbons Renton School District 403 300 Southwest 7�'Street Renton,WA 98055-2307 SUBJECT: Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Petition to Annex Dear Dr. Gibbons: The City Council formally authorized circulation of the 60% Petition to Annex at the Public Meeting on November 19, 2001. Enclosed, please find the petition form, with map and legal description attachments. As with the 10°Io petition, please ensure that each column is complete, with particular attention to the date of signing. The petition will be certified as suff'icient by the King County Department of Assessments. Your � signature must be accompanied by a copy of that portion of the bylaws that authorizes you to represent the school district in this matter. If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to call me at (425)430-6597. S' cerely, „�._._.__�_... � Gary Del Rosario Planning Technician II Enc. 60%Ltr doc\ ' 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 �This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer > 0 � � � E 6th St 124th PI �� , � � � I � � h PI E 4t St Q _ _ N h St h St z Q� IIII4 pIB1�li1{ �JJ � LL� ( I �_� ' _ � � Q � ++ -� CD � `�' E 13 nd t 2n St SE 13 � z Q � > > Q � �„ � � 0 J SE 136th St E 13 w � °' S > Q � � � — - — � 1 t PI. �� S 1 9t "' gt > Q � 1 � > � w � � 4n t — — �, � � 2n St. � � � � � 3d Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation Exhibit 1 : Vicinity Map � ProposedAnnexation � g�� 16�� Boundary Uti�O,�, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning Existing Corporate Sue Cazlson,Administrator _ � '� �:9 600 • � • Boundary � G.Del Rosario ��NT�$ Z�September 2001 F MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION Exhibit 2 Tracts 14 and 15 of Black Loam Five Acre Tracts, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, Page 101,records of King County,Washington; TOGETHER WITH that portion of 144"'Ave. SE(Cedar Street)and SE 136"'Street(SE 2°d Place) adj oining; LESS any portion?y:ng�vithin the area of intersection of 144`i'Avenue SE.and SE 136`i'Street. SITUATE in the northeast quarter of Section 15,Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,King County, Washington. H:�ECON_DEV�EconomicDevelopment\STRATPLN�PLANNING\ANNEX�1vlapiewoodHgts�lgl_desc.doc City Of Renton ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to he/p the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an E/S. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, orgive fhe best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do nof know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know"or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regu/ations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you p/an to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will he/p describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to wh�ch you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonab/y related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, comp/ete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as 'proposal," 'proposer,"and "affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Non-Project: Zoning of the proposed Maplewood Heights Annexation 2. Name of applicant:Renton Schooi District#403 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Contact Person: Facilities &Operations Ctr Gary Del Rosario Office of the Executive Director City of Renton 300 SW 7'h Street Economic Development, Neighborhoods Renton, WA 98055 and Strategic Planning Phone: (425) 430-6597 Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Project:Zoning of the Proposed Maplewood Heighfs Annexation December 14,2001 Page 2 of 11 4. Date checklist prepared: December 14, 2001 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedu/e (including phasing, if applicable): Completion of annexation and adoption of zoning anticipated for the second quarter of 2002. 7. Do you have any p/ans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Annexation of the subject property. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, direct/y related to fhis proposal. King County Comprehensive Plan Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Draft, Final and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposa/s directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Approval of the annexation of the subject properties is pending. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Adoption of zoning ordinance by the Renton City Council. i 1. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposed non-project action is the adoption of City of Renton R-5 zoning for the property included in the proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation. City of Renton zoning would supplant existing King County R-4 zoning, with annexation of the subject property. 12. LOC8t1017 Of the pIOpOSaI. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan, vicinity map,and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The subject area is the Maplewood Heights Elementary School parcel and adjacent right- of-way to the south. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rollinp, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Less than 25%. c. What genera/types of soils are found on the site (for examp/e, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farm/and. Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Project:Zoning of the Proposed Map/ewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 3 of 11 Alderwood (AgC) gravelly sandy loam (USDA Soil Conservation Service, 1972). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstab/e soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. The City's Critical Areas Inventory maps show no geologic hazards for the subject area. e. Describe fhe purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. N/A. This is a non-project action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. The proposal is a nonproject action. The site currently holds an elementary school. No development is anticipated in the future g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? N/A. This is a non-project action. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. 2. AIR a. What fypes of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is comp/eted? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. N/A. This is a non-project action. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. N/A. This is a non-project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A. This is a non-project action. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. The City's critical areas map inventory does not show any. 2) Will fhe projecf require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. N/A. This is a non-project action. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the sife that wou/d be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A. This is a nonproject action. Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renfon Environmental Checklist Non-Project:Zoning of the Proposed Map/ewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 4 of 11 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawa/s or diversions? Give genera/description,purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A. This is a nonproject action. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No portion of the subject area is mapped as 100-year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materia/s to surface WatECS? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. N/A. This is a nonproject action. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground wafer be withdrawn, or wi/l water 6e discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. N/A. This is a nonproject action. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, If al7y (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...;agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served(if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. N/A. This is a nonproject action. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. N/A. This is a nonproject action. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. N/A. This is a nonproject action. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. Potential impacts that may result from specific development proposals should be assessed and mitigations proposed through the application process. Future development under the proposed zoning would be required to comply with City of Renton Drainage Standards (RMC 4-6-030) 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree:alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Project:Zoning of the Proposed Map/ewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 5 of 11 X wet soil planfs:caftail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NA. This is a nonproject action. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known at this time. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Unknown. Portions of the subject area are undeveloped and may provide habitat to a variety of wildlife species. Birds:hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals:deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish:bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known fo be on or near the site. Unknown. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain The entire State of Washington is included within a migration route for birds, known as the Pacific Flyway. This flyway, as it overlies Renton, is used by a variety of migratory birds, including, but not limited to, the Canada Goose. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy(electric, natura/gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. NA. This is a nonproject action. b. Would your project affect fhe potential use of solar energy 6y adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NA. This is a nonproject action. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? Lisf other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmenta/Checklist Non-Project:Zoning of the Proposed Maplewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 6 of 1 i 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemica/s, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a resu/t of this proposal? If so, describe. N/A. This is a nonproject action. 1) Describe specia/emergency services that might be required. N/A. This is a nonproject action. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for examp/e:traffic, equipment, operation, other)? This is a nonproject action. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, ofher)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. This is a nonproject action. Existing noise from the elementary school would not expect to change from this non project action 3) Proposed measures to reduce or confrol noise impacts, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The subject area includes the Maplewood Heights Elementary School. Adjacent properties are predominantly residential and/or vacant. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No indication of agricultural uses on the site. c. Describe any structures on the site. One school and related buildings. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N/A. This is a non-project action. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current classification is King County's R-4 Zone. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? King County: Urban Residential -4 to 12 units per acre. City of Renton: Residential Single Family. g. If applicab/e, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmenfal Checklist Non-Project:Zoning of the Proposed Maplewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 7 of 11 N/A. h. Has any part of the site been c/assified as an "environmenta/ly sensitive"area? If so, specify. Unknown. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The number of people would not be expected to change due to this non-project action. j. Approximately how many peop/e wou/d the completed project displace? N/A. This is a nonproject action. k. Proposed measures fo avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. l. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed R-5 zoning is consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and applicable policies. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units wou/d be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A. This is a nonproject action. A elementary school currently exists on the property. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A. This is a nonproject action. A elementary school currently exists on the property. c. Proposed measures to reduce or contro/housing impacts, if any: N/A. This is a non-project action. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; . what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed. This is a nonproject action. b. What views in the immediate vicinity wou/d be altered or obstructed? N/A. This is a nonproject action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or g/are will the proposal produce? What time of day wou/d it main/y occur? N/A. This is a nonproject action. b. Cou/d light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmenta/Checklist Non-Projecf:Zoning of fhe Proposed Maplewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 8 of 11 N/A. This is a nonproject action. c. What exisfing off-site sources of light or g/are may affect your proposal? N/A. This is a nonproject action. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and g/are impacts, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? School playground. b. Wou/d the proposed project displace any existing recreationa/ uses? If so, describe. The proposal is a nonproject action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any p/aces or objects listed on, or proposed for, nationa/state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known or identified in the 1983 King County Newcastle Community Plan. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known or identified in the 1983 King County Newcastle Community Plan. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A. This is a non-project action. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing sfreet system. Show on site p/ans, if any. The subject parcel is served by 144'h Ave SE and SE 136th St. b. Is site current/y served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Unknown. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many wou/d the project eliminafe? N/A. This is a nonproject action. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streefs, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? N/A. This is a nonproject action. Future development under the proposed zoning will likely require the construction of new public and/or private streets and improvements to existing streets. Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Pro%ect:Zoning of the Proposed Maplewood Heighfs Annexation December 14,200 i Page 9 of 11 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. N/A. The proposal is a nonproject action. No water, rail or air transportation facilities are in the vicinity of the subject properties. f. How many vehicu/ar trips per day wou/d be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. NA. This is a nonproject action. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportafion impacts, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. Transportation impacts are assessed and mitigation measures applied with review of specific development projects. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Such services may include, but would not be limited to, fire protection and police protection. This nonproject action would bring the Renton School District's Maplewood Heights Elementary school into the City. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A. This is a non-project action. 16. UTILITIES a. Circ/e utilities currently availab/e at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Unknown. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. NA. This is a nonproject action. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclos e on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: l..l��y ��d Date: IZ,�7,b� Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Project:Zoning of the Proposed Map/ewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 10 of 11 D, SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for projecf actions.) Because these quesfions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to resu/t from the proposal, wou/d affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposal would not significantly alter the existing range of uses allowed nor the current maximum zoned density and therefore is not anticipated to increase the potential level of these emissions. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: None proposed. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? No significant impacts to plants, animals, fish or marine life are anticipated to occur as a consequence of the proposed zoning action. The proposal would supplant existing single family density residential zoning with similar zoning. Therefore, the potential impacts to plants, animals, fish and marine life is anticipated to be comparable under existing and proposed zoning. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None proposed. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? No significant depletion of energy or natural resources is anticipated to result from the proposal. Residential development that may occur under the proposed zoning would be comparable to that allowed under existing zoning. Energy and natural resources required to construct and maintain single family development may be depleted at about the same rate under either existing or proposed zoning. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None proposed. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat,historic or cultural sifes, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Protection of environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated for governmental protection would not change under this proposal. Proposed measures fo protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None proposed. Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmenta/Checklist Non-Project:Zoning of the Proposed Map/ewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 11 of 11 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposal would not affect shoreline use. The proposed R-5 zoning implements the Residential Single Family Land Use designation mapped for the subject area in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The range of allowed uses under both existing and proposed zoning are substantially the same — residential or compatible uses. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None proposed. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transporfation or public services and utilities? The proposal is not expected to significantly increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities, since the existing and proposed zoning is similar in terms of potential density and range of land uses. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None proposed. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No conflicts with local, state or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment are known. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or wiliful lack of full disclosure on my part. _... �� Proponent: Name Printed: 1�� (�� Date: l Z�l��b 1 Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC Annexation Review Form [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60%Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks_ Wastewater Utility � Transportation bfic Works Maintenance Current Planning - --------� FROM : �' Ecanomic Dev�top�eF►t;�e'tghbarhoozt� &��trategic Planning � ��_�_,_ .. _ _. SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Location : Subject parcel is bounded by Lyons Ave NE on the east, the concurrent Wofford annexation on the north, by 144th Ave SE (Jericho Ave NE) on the west, and SE 136th Street borders the south. The address is: 13430144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: Comments Due: General Information Area : 9.5 Street length : 627 linear feet (existing) Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (existing development) Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation � Reviewing Department/Division: 1. As proposed, does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? D�ELOPMEPfi'p��ING CITY OF RENTpN SEf O ��;4� . REC�i�"�D (Over) 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical e�ension of services provided by your departmenVdivision? 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) General recommendation and comments: ��GZ Signature: �, r�'��d—� Date: �`�'�G�'d� DEi/ELOPMEtVT S�RVICES Annexation Review Form ��N O�RENTON Sw� �d �� 1 [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petiti ��VE� TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Location : Subject parcel is bounded by Lyons Ave NE on the east, the concurrent Wofford annexation on the north, by 144th Ave SE (Jericho Ave NE) on the west, and SE 136m Street borders the ��. south. The address is: 13430144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: � Comments Due: General Information Area : 9.5 Street length : 627 linear feet (existing) Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (existing development) Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation • Reviewing Departmen Divisio : ��S'eor'I�a-TZ�?t� S'r�IM�s 1. As proposed, does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? NO, 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? �FV 1 ci�P�'�n�-p Iq-4-k,� avc 5�'�f�v�cko �v��1�`� �Me� � l,��ffi S'�efr c�v xa�n�e��a�� 'a�;g�i��NiNG C��fj► o.�`R,��s�+� ��a�d'avds. C��'�r�«�e� -f�ars't� �'�re��' wr�t 6� SEP p �- ''�c c�►a�n�'�" o� �.�w ��v�lc�f•�re�`P' a��`�r e?',�rx�P� R� �u20o1 �� o��►�a�, C�/VFD (over> 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your departmenddivision? y�s, 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? � /�� /te�dt7f�� v'dkS��1•�Ifah �T"r', Gt3lil �4i3T'" �l4� �`C�'�d��'��i �/�l' rKJ �� t�j��i cSTrGG�'T� ta�c.�K c��t vaa«�� r�Xe�� a�/a�o«co�.1 f �r6 ��fuT� sr��cd�C� a�`� 5�'�t.°� �t ��'i 'I�+o�-�'" ��£��°' C��, a� �e�p 5�•..�f�►�S wi I( bt �� tt �G.'Jtt� �� g''� c�V1-�o , �n�2wd �{{S'�t� 1dh�/0�'�"�,I4r.i`r�+°'!""3�. �.�r�r tt�s�'x ;oT,SS" �t�Ge3t1�i�� I►g a?� r►ac�w� st r� a«.cl �avCH+y 'f"1�e�ie ,rrla�rtTtrte�nc.� ,�a► vt� ac y �y� ,rr 5. V'�ou ci"�alternate boun�fari�re�te a more logical annexati�n for provision of City services. ��,� (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) r--' ��f �a� ..��.��c�� S� �3�►�. 5-�►�� t�� ,c. ��r�,r,�� `�h�"� � � 6'� �� r�4� � �.�' �' .�"� Cx � h � �� o�r ��, General recommendation and comments: ° ��.. !/':e�+:,� r��d� ��',�'��' �!�/l�'!�k ��-;�� G��t�M.,� � �'� c��ih Wf��T h�{� o� �l OT 7 n�3 ��b��f �nh�ka rld� � � d+C=-�-��. �� :�� Signature: , �'��G��M� Date: `� �� Annexation Review Form [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60%Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Location : Subject parcel is bounded by Lyons Ave NE on the east, the concurrent Wofford annexation on the north, by 144'h Ave SE (Jericho Ave NE) on the west, and SE 136th Street borders the south. The address is: 13430144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: Comments Due: General Information Area : 9.5 Street length : 627 linear feet (existing) Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (existing development) Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation � Reviewing DepartmenUDivision: �y - - � 1. As proposed, does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �._��?G(C� C' /��G/�-c:�-�7(�'7'7 G�'-� ?��z2;.��7�c - . 1 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area�� Z�Cf �-'� �"��/�L� �E�'�"U -��'c��lG`�// �� 7`� �Ev M� ' C CIN OF��ON�IiVG ,�� . . �� . �'c ��G�l�?' e.�-�� SEP 0,�"��,;9 �1��2��2�c�� ' E � � `'! 2� ��,�.�� Over) ��`� 7G�'��-. 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? } - 2,� "� GZ��,c-A�� iZR ..�-��7 i�-�_ � /YYU,y7-� , 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur a esult of this �nnexation� ��rvyy2c c �illC ./l � l'/LC�2x'C��Z �. �'Y�c� �� . �� . Z!r'Z�� uil — .�'"C-1 �f� G�c�� G�� i-�iyl � � �Jrz.tm-tC,G'1criYlC,e_,� �}�' c�.�nG�7 c'd;`�7� �iy . � .��. , �� :�� --�-��-' � % h' . Would alternate boundaries create a more logical ann ation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) n�� General recommendation and comments: �;�- fz, �.-t-�- �2-�o a�r.�� ..sj ._ . �__� � ___-__. . � ��,�-'� ��,��.�,��, � � " c Signature: ate: / +�}�VcLUt�dv�t�ri�i ;;��1lICES CI�'(J�'E:��,'tTC��I Annexation Review Form 'r ,j r�"n �n }� i �u�� ✓a 7 .t. [ X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition, �� TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility s •� --._� Police Transportation f ��'� Public Works Maintenance Current Planning � � SEP 2 6 2001 FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Plann'ing_ f NEIGHBORHO �ND S7RqTEGIC P� SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Location : Subject parcel is bounded by Lyons Ave NE on the east, the concurrent Wofford annexation on the north, by 144th Ave SE (Jericho Ave NE) on the west, and SE 136th Street borders the south. The address is: 13430 144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: Comments Due: General Information Area : 9.5 Street length : 627 linear feet (existing) Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (existing development) Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation � �Na� uti� ' Reviewing Department/Division: YI(Cr►i� 1. As proposed, does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �0 - ' �� - �a,�r� ��rv�c�. ��. ��.� �r�pos�d a n�►t�a�► i� ua� � � �� CD�s�r� c�- � q G. r . Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? ��ci��' rt- ��c,v�� .. SEp o�.��, c o�CE/VE� 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your departmenUdivision? N��" A�P V�c-�t� - 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �� "'.�7 '�� .��i£�C� 6�. '��`►�G �� `'( �D� '� � �1 , 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �� General recommendation and comments: � G�C'1'�t��"� 6'� U3 R°"�r� A�I'P�i� A B�i u'°�'( �-o r°� W� �a a� �I S ��`c�cu i�� F D� ��1`� fl�ri�c t,��°�4' t�'��u 'fih� PRG�C�� 1�t� N�X l�'t�c�� r Signature: �ti''V ��"�v Date: � � O l �� `�-u� DE�L��i�w��i v�R�IC�: CITY�?�t;��i QN Annexation Review Form �`�� : : �� °''�� [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition ��`�'°�� TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Location : Subject parcel is bounded by Lyons Ave NE on the east, the concurrent Wofford annexation on the north, by 144'h Ave SE (Jericho Ave NE) on the west, and SE 136th Street borders the south. The address is: 13430 144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: Comments Due: General Information Area : 9.5 Street length : 627 linear feet (existing) Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (existing development) Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation � ,/� � � Reviewing DepartmenVDivision: /��• �' 1. As proposed, does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your departmenUdivision? � 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? � DEVELOPMENp�p�q��ING CITY OF RENTpN SEP 0�'ZQ01 R��VED 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division?�� 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �� 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) . � �1 ,�� -��-��e.. /°</°y..�,�� s"�' ` �c,-cs-c-�,-� -�„� .�re�/J ` � G� 2� .�-'7-�.� -�-�� -�L' 1" -��' �r�,�� c. /3v�-� ��u.� �c�� Gene a recommendation and comments: 5��'��s � � � - �� c.-� ��-��a; ,�, 3;-, . � �{,�,'��L�-, l� �j ' �_,.�� `�y , ��,._.z. Signatur . � Date: � 1 � '� � � CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 26,2001 TO: Gary Del Rosario,Economic Development � FROM: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility�� SUBJECT: Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary School Annexation In response to your request for review of the subject annexation petition area, concerning Surface Water Issues specifically,we present the following: • Question 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your division? There are no known drainage problems within this proposed annexation area. The area is within Maplewood Creek sub-basin of the Cedar River basin. There are known flooding, erosion, water quality, and habitat problems due to urbanization within the Maplewood Creek sub-basin. Any future development should be conditioned through SEPA to meet the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual until the City updates our current code for drainage standards to be equivalent. This area is currently developed with an elementary school. • Question 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? The area generally consists of ditches to convey runoff for streets and lacks improved piped storm system typically used to convey runoff from streets in urban areas. • Question 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your division? Yes, the proposed annexation area is within a drainage basin that is currently served by the City of Renton. • Question 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? At a minimum, staffing levels (especially maintenance staffing) would need to expand in proportion to the additional area that the utility is responsible far serving. • Question 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? + 9/26/2001 Page 2 of 2 The City would assume the responsibility for the existing storm drainage systems associated with road right of way. There are no known agreements or franchises for the storm water systems within this area. • Question 6. Would alternative boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? No. cc: Lys Hornsby Jack Crumley Mike Dotson John Thompson H:\DIVISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS�2,001�2001-562.doc\RJS\tb D��PMENT SERVI�'�S , CiTY OF RE,ti i 01V Annexation Review Form ��P 14 2a01 ( X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petiti��Gf�� TO : Bui�ding Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Location : Subject parcel is bounded by Lyons Ave NE on the east, the concurrent Wofford annexation on the north, by 144th Ave SE (Jericho Ave NE) on the west, and SE 136th Street borders the south. The address is: 13430144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: Comments Due: General Information Area : 9.5 Street length : 627 linear feet (existing) Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (existing development) Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation � Reviewing DepartmendDivision: ��ly�-q:� G'�� '7 L�'"'.� 1. As proposed, does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? ��,� � l�c �t� c/ ,�'/len,�c� 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? D�E��p�� 2.r�,� ��i v ��'o��n�T�;��c. SEp D��L 1 RFCF�V�O (over> i 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical e�ension of services provided by your departmenUdivision? �� G�:C1��D ./�-�nt� 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? S� �,��0 �� 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �Q ��r� ��'�.'�'Lt,v General recommendation and comments: � Signature: `��'��' Date: �M Z S_^ a � r �� =� ��--�'-�-- u.:a/-�oec� �-P�-�-�- PLN/BLDG/PUBLIC WORKS DEPT � REQUEST TO OPEN NEW FILE TO: TECHNICAL SERVICES DATE: 3�'c5�� FROM: Judv Wr�aht DIVISION/SEGTION: Econom�c Development, Nei4hborhoodc R StratPnir p�annZng ######################################## # ��-�',�`�, C�.,-r��'�'.� Q.�r� C�'�� TITLE OR NAME OF FILE: �� `�'� �� "�``�� (70 Characters M um) OTHER NAMES,KEYWORDS,OR ALIAS: (70 Characters Max Each) DFSCRIPTION OF FILE CONTENT: f� ' Location of File: (code#on file drawer) <`�� --��`� SUGGESTED FILE CODE: � �P /`f- c�p.�� - Narrative: (include disposition slrategy and retention schedule) SUBMITTING DIVISIONS SUPERVISOR APPROVAL: forms/new file/ckd APPROVED BY TSS: DATE: 5-31-91 � CITY QF RENTQN sEP o 4 zoo� NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE RECEIVED ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS CITY CLERK'S OFFICE UNDER RC W 35A.14.120 (Direct Petition Method) TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON City Hall 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) in value, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of property which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of the area described below. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. 1. At such meeting, the City Council will decide whether the City will accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposal having been prepared and filed for the area to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340; and, 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement,shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Page 1 of 2 The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.) ��r <�; a r�x•-� �s�; 7 �`� '=_ � � � 4�' � � �� e a �i`w;�t s T #� �.� 3` � ' j ,�,ca�- . 3o a �u�. �� sf 1. ��1 d� DoGvr�g �J`: �',bdoNs �e�t�n� {�/��-- ��s-s �,1(UOO�ID 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Page 2 of 2 H:�D I V I S I ON.S\P&TS\P LAN N I NG W N N EX�10%FOR M2.DOC\OD — - - — . , _ _ - .: - �� -- - - -- -- - ----- � - ; � i � t � � -- -- --- -- � � � -- > � � - „ .. �_. _-: - -,,, - � - - - - � , - - -- - �i .,..., __ __l Y _> , � '�_-'� , I �r�T -__ I-_-___--___-'___�� ,' ' ;� � � r} _- - '_—_-, � � I I � ---z__-T'__r- _"-_-"- _ '__-_ � � r_ I r.� -- �I -�---��_" —_._ �'` � � � I I � �I �1 + � i�� — I - ' J —� � �_ — J i�`�th ; -- � I�.� i�I I , w T -r- � _ i - � j I - -, � i — -_ -� �� i �-----� _� =L �� - � - � � � � � � � _ - - , i , � I ; � � — I � � �� il P� �+Ir ii_i� ��t O � m �/ � � , fv ' ' , �, � h St t�l .�t � _ �--- � � � � � i � � - ,�, �, w � I � � ; --- � � � > _ - �- r� �� _ � ----�- � � � - �- � _� ' ` - E ?�� ',�d -� - �n � , �.� �- St � SE 1 J', , �� i ., � --- i_'� �fT'r `��- _� -- - \ IC'�� ,— _.—_l� —� � --L � �- -,r" -._ / -- -��l_ �� I , � --- ' � I �� '-', \f �' � � Q �j — —� I _ ^�T I ,,� L --- \` ' � _ L � � � � " -- `__ �,1,,' �=J -c � c_ -.� - - —� > --- I, fl�_ - � / � � J I' �' --T �� ' SE i,�Gtr, St � � ' � 13r ..� �- ;_ �,�_ � , w � \ � ,��,�,,�� , � � `, ��_ � , a� c�F f�� , '��,,�t� \ � � - �� i-t;,�-�,�..� i � --� `S — �� •� � `� � �\'� ` `\ ,� � - --- `---�� - :1�� >�� - ��F �,4� t fj l r�� --- � , - � \ �-�- � --�L- , - �--- --- �� I --� �. �' y, C,,i ---�_ - �, 1 g t�,�,� \ � 9 f r i'-- —� � � ,'� � �, �' � � Q -�`��d�.:,;;�-�. � ---- -- -� - % �� I � - � � � 1� �� ,� I � � _ - � _ �, � � :� I - `r� I II ,;�. \ I , - �i - � � �� i i r , j i� cn �,� r� - - � � �� - _ , T- L ,�� 4 'n�! t �, � V, � ' ��' t�{2n Ct. ` � ',.� � � - ,� � \ , . �� \, '� \ _ — � � -- - �� \ I ,,,� \y �— — - —� —� j � / � � -��=y� ��i � �t- - - 3�d �?�_. Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation Exhibit 1 : Vicinity Map _,_ ProposedAnnexation Q 800 1(00 Boundary �i��,� Ecouomic Developcnent,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning Existing Corporate 1 i Sue Carlson,AcLninistrs[or '�`"�" '�`� 1.9 600 '��' c.v�i a�ss�� Boundary � �%.,�.��i� 27SeptemUer2001 --j �- ' � � ` ' I 1 — `—I I� II I ��I� ❑ I I � i � � ��❑�' uu I � I �� [r�-- ❑ � �' L_ �_ � ___ a � ____--1' � � � ' ❑ -- o _ , �, ,�, � o ❑ � _ �� , ,�- -- � � � > 1 �. �, a > � �-- � --�-J � � O --- --- _��-- ❑ ---------- � � 0 0 , ,� - ,� r� i , ) �, 1 0 i _ �_, �',� I' �_'—I C� f�� , } � � � �^ � � �' --- � � � � �� Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation F i g u re 2: Exi sti n g Stru ctu res �� Proposed Annexation Boundary Q 200 �t�� -�� Existing Corporate Boundary j�Y—�� Economic Dcvelopment,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � Sue Carlson,Admimstrator Existing Structure 1 .2 400 ��_•-'} G.Del Rosariu � � ��'/'— ��' �OJuIy-001 ,ti'1 i —' —� i �---��, r �i i I � � i � ------� —- j _ '�_„-! ,,I� �i - - I —I __ ` I '— I` � � I � I� � i I \ � I � s-�,� j � I f- �------- \ � , I ;--- , --�-�- — ----�-=_- C� __J � � 1 _ ._..� � --- ______ _ 1� �- � �� ;-�-= � ��, � � ___/ � � � � � � � _� � ------------- ___� % �_ � � � , i 1 --+--� � � ��—i—_ 's � _ ` _— ' �— _J � � I _.. . � � 1 i �1 � � �, �— —� r � �� --- � �_. � ; �,� -� �--- — L � r � j�) � � � ;� _— � �,o� � � 1— — , � � �1 � ,_ �. Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation Figure 3: Topography ProposedAnnexationBoundary O 200 �oo 1Y �»�»+��+ ExistingCorporateBoundary ,1i�o� rconomic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning �i��l� SueCadso�,Adminis[rator �pllflf@N2�COf1l0Uf 1 •�� ,00 r� G.Del Rosario �'�'N'i��$ �0 July 2001 „ �- ;°��- CITY OF 1�ENTOloT ..LL ` -�. Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Planning � �. 7esse Tanner,Mayor Susan Carlson,Administrator March 5, 2002 State of Washington � Boundary Review Board for King County Central Building, Suite 608 810 Third Avenue Seattle,WA 98104-1693 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF INTENTION TO EXPAND THE CITY OF RENTON CORPORATE LIMITS BY ANNEXATION Dear Board Members: As required by Chapter 36.93 of the Revised Code of Washington(RCW),the City of Renton hereby gives notice of intention to annex territory hereafter referred to as the "Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation”. This annexation is proposed under the direct petition method in accordance with the applicable provisions of Chapter 35A.14 of the RCW. The petition has been certified by the King County Department of Assessments. This annexation would incorporate into the City of Renton approximately 9.95 acres of territory for the provision of urban services. To assist in your consideration of the proposed action, the required articles and exhibits are enclosed and numbered in accordance with the Board's suggested format. The$50.00 filing fee is also enclosed. Should questions arise during the review of the information and exhibits provided with this Notice of Intention to Annex, please feel free to contact Don Erickson, Senior Planner, at (425) 430-6581. Please send notices and other communications regarding the proposed annexation to: Don Erickson, AICP/Senior Planner Department of Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Thank you for your consideration. rely, �`��`. Jesse Tanner Mayor 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 1` � l� � � jr This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CED (PLANNING) DEPT FILE LUA-01-120 �� ,t :. . ;. _ � �+ � � CI'TY UF REl�TC1N ` D�FAR'�'MENfi QF COMMUN� & ECONOMIC D�VELQ�'1VIENT �E�I4��►�l�'I��;I�i : Qate:, Qc�otier� 27, 2�ib To: City Clerk's af�ice From: �tacy M Tucker Sub e�c#; Lar�d Use Fiie Gtos�out Please eompl�te the following 'inforniation tn facilitafie p�oject closeout and indexing by the City Cler�k's Off�C�. �roj+ect�1��. Ntapfewood Hei_ghts E1�mentary Annexatton 1UA(fil�) i'�rmmber: ' LU�4-Q1-120, ECF Cros��R+�fere��s: Annexation File #A-p1-005 AKA's: ,Project Manager: Gaty t��el Rasarlo Acceptanc� t��te: : December 26, 2001 � Applica�nt: , Rentt�n �chooi District Clwner: 5ame as`appficant Confiact: Gary i7�I�Rosario PID Number: . '. 48471t�0090 � ERC D�is�on Date: January i�, 2002 ERC /�lpp+�l�t t��'te: February 4, 2002 � Administra�iv� aen�al: App+ea! P+Br�i�d'Ends: Public H�iring �a#e: , flate App+aaied to HEX: � By WhotnE � HEX Dec�s�t�n. . Date: '�ate�p�at�t.t,+�Cor��clt. By W1��m; Counral`Dec�siQr�: . � Datec Mylar Recordl�Number. . Project D��s1r��it�rt: '�nvirc►r�mental (SEPA� Review approvai for a non-p�oject action of a 60% �nnexat�on p�tlt�or� ta annex the Maplewood He�ghts Ei�mentary Schaat into the City. Location: i30,lericho Avenue SE Comm��tt�. 11�1/01 - Cauncil approved 10% petitibn. 2/11/02 - Council approved 60% petition. +M""""rr" yri✓ rarV February 11,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 51 Human Services: Business Jay Leviton,Director of the Renton School District's Career&Life Skills Committed to Kids Award Education program, announced that Wizards of the Coast was chosen as the (Communities in Schools of latest recipient of the "Business Committed to Kids" award. Mr. Leviton Renton) described the many contributions Wizards of the Coast makes within the Renton community, saying that they have a history of supporting disadvantaged students in a variety of ways. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Maplewood accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public hearing Heights Elementary,Jericho to consider the 60% Annexation Petition for the Maplewood Heights Ave NE&SE 136th St Elementary Annexation; approximately 9.5 acres located at the NE corner of SE 136th St. and 144th Ave. SE(Jericho Ave. NE). Lu►� al' E� Gary Del Rosario,Planning Technician, stated that the 10% Notice of Intent Petition was accepted on November 19, 2001, and now the 60% Petition has been submitted. Describing the annexation area,Mr. Del Rosario explained that the site includes the Maplewood Heights Elementary School and associated buildings. Existing King County zoning is R-4 (allows up to a base density of four units per gross acre, and up to six units per acre with incentives and transfer of density credits)and the area is designated RR(Residential Rural) in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. He explained that the potential zoning for a public use in the RR designation is R-5(P) (maximum density of five units per acre)and R-1(P) (maximum density of one unit per acre). R-5(P)zoning is proposed for this area because it is consistent with the adjacent zoning. Continuing,Mr. Del Rosario noted that the subject area is within the water service area of Water District 90;Renton currently provides sewer service; and fire protection is provided through a contract with Fire District#25. Explaining that the additional costs to the City are minimal if the site is annexed, he pointed out that the annexation would bring$5,146,600 of assessed value to the City. In conclusion,Mr. Del Rosario stated that the proposal is generally consistent with City policies for annexation, and recommended acceptance of the 60%Petition to Annex. Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE 60% PETITION TO ANNEX FOR THE MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY ANNEXATION AND AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO PREPARE A NOTICE OF INTENTION PACKAGE FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. CARRIED. APPEAL Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Planning&Development report regarding the DeBar Preliminary Plat appeal(PP-01-058). The Committee Committee convened to consider the appeal of the recommendation of the Appeal: DeBar Preliminary Hearing Examiner dated August 20, 2001. The subject property is located at Plat,Brad Nicholson(PP-01- 2132, 2200, 2216 and 2224 NE 28th St. in Northeast Renton. The applicant 058) seeks to subdivide 2.69 acres into 141ots suitable for single-family residential development. ENVlRC1NM��l7'�.. COMMITTEE � RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review j AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Committee has issued a ' Determination of Non-Significance Barbara Alther, first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the for the following project untler the ' authority of the Renton Municipal � SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL Cotle. ' 600 S.Washington Avenue,Kent, Washington 98032 M A P L E W 0 0 D H E I G H T S ELEMENTARY ANNEXATION a daily newspaper published seven(7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of LUA-01-120,A,ECF general publication and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of Nonproject action: Proposal publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a daily would supplant existing R-4 King i newspaper in Kent, King County,Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a COunty zOning with R-5 Renton legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. zOning UpOn annexati0n of the The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County Journal(and property included in the proposed not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers during the below Ma lewood Hei hts Elementa stated period. The annexed notice, a P 9 ry � � Annexation. The uses and Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation densities allowed under existing King County zoning are generally as published on: 1/21/02 consistent with uses and densities The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$110.63, charged to allowed untler the proposed R-5 Acct. No. 8051067. �P) Z�• �� R�� ►� located at tf� NE cx�mer �f SE The cost above includes a$6.00 fee for the printing of the affidavits. #� �t � �� y$� SE. 1`he annexation area i Legal Number 9951 includes a single parcel I (Maplewood Heights Elementary Legal Clerk, outh County Joumal School)and atljacent right-of-way ' Appeals of the environmental f determination must be filed in writing' Subscribed and sworn before me on this �� lay of ,2002 on or before 5:00 PM February 4, ^ 2002. A eals must be filed in ``��.��a,�"°��r,FFyP,�� ( ` writing toge her with the required � �.��:•:� � � 'cN;�;,�i '�� Notary Public of the tate of shington $75.00 application fee with: Hearing, �Q:•;;> � �"��',�•��o residing in Renton Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 :'�• - ' . '�"m King County,Washington South Grady Way, Renton, WA I _ ; —�. ' � 98055. Appeais to the Examiner are ; �•. �, F� ,,e�. � � governed by City of Renton � a;' < �f.; �r oo;o?� Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. �.o�r'•:..z r, , ?.,• V�ee� Additional information regarding the I ,�d6j��' �,��S�+�N d>'° appeal process may be obtained� °a�aeamus►►°d60 from the Renton City Clerk's Office,; (425)-430-6510. Publishetl in the Souih Co�atty Jaumal January 21,200`t:9�51 � � j CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the�_day of f,1 �'Z�L,�L�� ,� , 2002, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed enxelope containing �r� �J` �k.v�c��o✓� documents. This information was sent to: Name Representinp �'� � 'C�'-C+ (..�� A � (Signature of Sender) �'� l �� STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that �(��Y{� � �-��u� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: ' D / � I � �,��:��y gr� �tl��=;�;µ;� Notary Pub ic in d for the State of Washi on ; ��a,..��Y. P�L�L I�✓ MARILYN KAMCHEFF STATE�F V�JASHIfVGT�iV Notary(Print) M a ointme i E��XPtRES:6.29.e3 COMMISSIO�1 ��!�E� y PP JUl��29, 2003 ,�. Project Name: . 1 r�' � � � G� �S �� CC Cti� Project Number: L�l d� c� � - r Z v . � � =C F . NOTARY.DOC . � � � AGENCY(DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology Larry Fisher Mr. Rod Malcom, Fisheries Environmental Review Section WA Dpt. Of Fish &Wildlife Muckleshoot Indian Tribe PO Box 47703 C/o Dept. of Ecology 39015— 172'�Avenue SE Olympia,WA 98504-7703 3190—160th Ave. SE Auburn,WA 98092 Bellevue,WA 98008 WSDOT Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Mr. David Dietzman King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 14235 Ambaum Blvd. SW—Front A Dept. of Natural Resources PO Box 330310 Burien,WA 98166 PO Box 47015 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 OI m ia, WA 98504-7015 US Army Corp. of Engineers Ms. Shirley Marroquin Eric Swennson Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Seattle Public Utilities PO Box C-3755 KC Wastewater Treatment Division 710—2nd Avenue, 10'h Floor Seattle,WA 98124 201 South Jackson St, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle,WA 98104 Attn: SEPA Reviewer Seattle,WA 98104-3855 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton,WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72"� Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle,WA 98059 Kent,WA 98032-5895 Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga Metro Environmental Planning PSE—Municipal Land Planner KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868 201 South Jackson Street Ms: XRD-01 W Seattle,WA 98104 Bellevue,WA 98009-0868 Last printed 11/19/01 11:34 AM _.__._ r..r ____..�._.,W_.._.._...,. ...+ ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION MAPLEWOOD HEI6HTS ELEMENTARY ANNEXATION LUA-01-120,R,A,ECF NonproJect ac0on:Proposal would supplant existing R-4 King Counry zoning with R-5 Renton zoning upon annexetbn of fhe property Induded in the proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation. The uses and densities allowed under exlstinp Kinp County mning are generelly consistent with uaes end denaitles allowad under the proposed R-5(P)zone.Subject parcel Is located at the NE corner of SE 136� SVeet and 144"'Avenue SE.The annezetlon aree InGudea e sinple parcel(Maplawood Heighta Elemenlery School)and edjacent righl-of-way. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT AdVEf7SE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmenWl determinatlon must be flled In wrlting on or before 5:00 PM February 4, 2002. Appeals must be flled in wrlting together with the required 575.00 appllcation fea with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Munlcipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additlonal informatlon regardfng the appeal process may be obtalned from the Renton City Clerk's Oftice,(425)-430-6570. �i - ein t 1 q O % n si � n ' ' M rzu � � �s I]fiq � Y Y � � � �' Proposed Maplewood Helghts Elem.MnexaUon ��.. Euhibtt 1:Vldniry Map _�� o�soo ��.._.�.......r,..r __ e...w.. t: —�, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-6597. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when ealling for proper flle identiflcatlon. CERTIFICATION �,��/ ,, � I, GL�C��,��--_= , hereby certify that_�copies of the above document were posted by me in � conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on�Il�=�� r z Signed: � G�� ATTEST: Subscribed a worn before me,a Notary Public,in and for the Sta of �as�iin ton residing i ,on the ) 7,`� day of �"�,��. �(Zc�- ;- w:�.� .� � p , . m. {,..�rs�,�•�•� _ ,� �� fiNARILYN KAMCHEFF T � :, . � ��. _�� r ri��i`',` �;° `?,i a i'"e�'.'"�',I � MY APPOiNTMENT D(PIRES:6-29-03 � C(�i�A�"J�:.�>;=�i'.Ta`�3 .. .' �.,, � Ji.r ." . , � •, ��' _ "�v F . . � � '�111/� _ . ! . CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the�_day of �('�,vcfi� L�,l , 2002, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed en�/elope containing . ��(11 f11"� �Y�L j�Z-�'c r rn;�u,,r��-�--� c::�� documents. This information was sent to: Name Reoresentinp ��" d 1 � (Signature of Sender) �� ` ' STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that � �Q '� �C�u�J signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: � , � 'Z �� f'� `�t Q�v� G�� ,s;��3�� ,��:�a Notary Publi and for the State of Wa ington a.^��°��?, °� �'��,,.� �RY PUBLIC Notary(Print) ��-� �H� SiATE(?�V�!l�SHINGTON My appointment e i ' COnfl�litSSi�N EXPI�EJ JUNE 2J, 2003 Project Name: )�, � � W� � i/ �t � � % Project Number: LU �1 �I- � 0 1- NOTARY.DOC � Smooth Feed SheetsT"' �,�� Use temptate for 5160� � � 084710007703 084710007307 152305912601 BARDSLEY DEBRA M BRENDEN ROGER BROMILEY JANEE MARA BARDSLEY JOSEPH P 13224 144TH SE 13621 144TH AVE SE 13309 146TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 152305916701 084710009006 059340003009 DOWNS JOAN M FACILITIES&OPERATIONS CTR HEIDE ROBERT L 13611 144TH AVE SE OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIR 13628 143RD AVE SE RENTON WA 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98055 98059 084710014006 152305905506 152305910605 KAMPHAUS HENRY B &DIANE L KING COUNTY KRIEG JOHN C JR 14714 SE 145TH PL 500 K C ADMIN BLDG 13617 144TH AVE SE RENTON WA SEATTLE WA RENTON WA 98059 98104 98059 084710008107 084710008008 084710007604 MARUI SHIGEKI NIGHT RONALD R&JANICE A NOYOLA LARRY+JUANA C 624 MOTOMACHI-DORI 4 CHOME P O BOX 6 13226 144TH AVE SE CHUO-K RENTON WA RENTON WA KOBE JAPAN 98057 98059 �� 059340001003 059340002001 084710011507 RATHER ROBERT J+SUSAN R RUTHERFORD FRANK W SMITH JOSEPH A&KATHY L 14241 SE 136TH 13620 143RD SE PO BOX 24792 RENTON WA RENTON WA SEATTLE WA 98059 98059 98124 084710010004 152305910506 084710007505 TARANTOLA JOSEPH&LORNA VERVAIR LINDA A WOFFORD WILLIAM E 5610 SE 2ND PL 14325 SE 136TH ST 13323 146TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 Tracy Romero STEVE BECK 14415 SE 132nd St. 4735 NE 4TH ST Renton,WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 /�� qVERY� Address Labels Laser 5160� ;y - ,.� , � CITY•.�«JF RENTON LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 7, 2002 Renton School District#403 Facilities & Operations 300 SW 7th Street Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation—60% Notice Project No. LUA-01-120,R,A,ECF Gentlemen: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-6597. F he Environmental Review Committee, ,�.�_M.._..:...__^m _.__ ...__w_----� ( ,�.�.�_�_ . �� ..�____- Gary Del R sari Planning Technician II cc: Mr. & Mrs. Joe Bardsley/Party of Record �t�:� 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 �This paper con4ains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer January 28,2002 � Renton City Council Minutes � Page 30 Annexation: Maplewood Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Heights Elementary,Jericho recommended a public hearing be set on February 11, 2002,to consider the Ave NE&SE 136th St 60% Petition to Annex and proposed R-5(P) (Residential Single Family; five (r�� "�� dwelling units per acre—public)zoning for the proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation; approximately 9.95 acres located at the northeast corner of SE 136th St. and 144th Ave. SE(Jericho Ave. NE). Council concur. Streets: S 180th St/SW 43rd St Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of the City of Closure(Tukwila's Grade Tukwila's plans for a road closure on S. 180th St./SW 43rd St. for a grade Separation Project) separation project for 12 months beginning March or Apri12002. Refer to Transportation Committee. Transportation: Main Ave S Transportation Systems Division recommended that the speed limit on Main Speed Limit Increase from 25 Ave. S. between S. Grady Way and S. 3rd St. be increased from 25 to 35 miles to 35 mph per hour. Refer to Transportation Committee. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED TO REMOVE ITEMS 6.d., 6.e., 6.f. AND 6.h. FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION. CARRIED. Separate Consideration Community Services Department requested authorization to fill the Parks Item 6.d. Maintenance Manager position at Step E of the salary range and to reimburse Community Services: Park moving expenses up to$8,000. Maintenance Manager Hire at Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler requested more information regarding the Step E&Moving Expenses number of applications received to fill this position and whether they were local or distant applicants. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCII,REFER ITEM 6.d. TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Item 6.e. Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Comprehensive Plan: WA St recommended acceptance of a grant in the amount of$42,000 from Washington Department of Community State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development to update Trade Grant the City's Comprehensive Plan. Responding to Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler's inquiry regarding the grant amount,Economic Development Administrator Sue Carlson explained that the City received a grant in the amount of$42,000 but applied for a$49,500 grant in hopes of getting additional funds to do additional work. She stated that the grant will be used to fund a planning technician to help with the housing element of the Comprehensive Plan and the total project cost is $42,000. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COIJNCII.APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 6.e. AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. (See page 34 for resolution.) Item 6.f. Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department EDNSP: HoteUMotel Tax recommended approval of the Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Revenue Allocations, recommendation to allocate$67,500 of the hoteUmotel tax revenues to the Hamilton/Saunderson& Renton Community Marketing Campaign and$116,550 to the Renton Lodging Chamber of Commerce Association. Authorization was also sought to execute the contracts with Contracts Hamilton/Saunderson Marketing Partnership for year four of the marketing campaign and with the Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce for year three of the Renton Lodging Association's tourism promotional effort. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler recommended that the revenue stream and the amount of the expenditures be carefully examined when the Finance Committee reviews this item. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY 'rrr+' ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY ANNEXATION LUA-01•120,R,A,ECF Nonproject action: Proposal would supplant existing R-4 King County zoning with R-5 Renton zoning upon annexation of the property included in the proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation. The uses and densities allowed under existing King County zoning are generally consistent with uses and densities allowed under the proposed R-5(P)zone.Subject parcel is located at the NE corner of SE 136�n Street and 144�'Avenue SE. The annexation area includes a single parcel(Maplewood Heights Elementary School)and adjacent right-of-way. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeais of the environmental determination must be filed ln writing on or before 5:00 PM February 4, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together wlth the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Sectlon 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton Clty Clerk's Office,(425)-430-6510. � 6lh 5 � 124th p� � 6 ' � E 4t St � L � h PI N h t h St "� E t nd l 2n t SE 13 � z 6 < � � � E iJ6lh E 13 � � i S � g� � 1 �� n Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem.Annexation �,�+�� Exhibit 1:Vicinity Map ��^^ o` '�oo �"""a""""'Y°°..""�."d'"r" �'°`"�'.' I:�fimEIVED r.� ��—eww�r FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-6597. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. �y � �"' CITY'�F RENTON ••+� Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 17,2002 Renton School District#403 Facilities &Operations 300 SW 7th Street Renton,WA 98055 SUBJECT: Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation—60% Notice Project No. LUA-01-120,R,A,ECF Gentlemen: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on January 15, 2002, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non- Significance. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 4, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-6597. F the Environmental Review Committee, .___..________� __ _ .__�......... - ___ ; ' �, _--..✓.�-�:-.� , Gary De osario Planning Technician II cc: Mr. & Mrs.Joe Bardsley/Party of Record dnsle4Eer 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 �This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer ;� ,,� �""" CITY`�F RENTON ..�t Planning/Building/Public Works Departrnent J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 17, 2002 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)on January 15, 2002: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY ANNEXATION LUA-01-120,A,ECF Nonproject action: Proposal would supplant existing R-4 King County zoning with R-5 Renton zoning upon annexation of the property included in the proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation. The uses and densities allowed under existing King County zoning are generally consistent with uses and densities allowed under the proposed R-5(P)zone. Subject parcel is located at the NE corner of SE 136th Street and 144th Avenue SE. The annexation area includes a single parcel (Maplewood Heights Elementary School)and adjacent right-of-way. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 4, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-6597. For the Environmental Review Committee, � Gary Del osario Planning Technician II i cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) US Army Corp. of Engineers Enclosure �� 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 �This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer �r' `'� CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-01-120,A, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton, Utility Systems PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Nonproject action: Proposal would supplant existing R-4 King Counry zoning with R-5 Renton zoning upon annexation of the property included in the proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation. The uses and densities allowed under existing King County zoning are generally consistent with uses and densities allowed under the proposed R-5 (P) zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Sub�ect parcel is located at the NE corner of SE 136th Street and 144 Avenue SE. The annexation area includes a single parcel (Maplewood Heights Elementary School)and adjacent right-of- way. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved,the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14)days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 4, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: January21, 2002 DATE OF DECISION: January 15, 2002 SIGNATURES: � regg i m rma , Administrator DAT Departm nt f nning/Building/Public Works , , / /� C� �,._ im hepherd,A mini a or DAT Corrimunity Services Department � ��-- �5 a� Lee heeler, Fire Chief � DAT Re on Fire Depa�tment dnssignature � � NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY ANNEXATION LUA-01-120,A,ECF Nonproject action: Proposal would supplant existing R-4 King County zoning with R-5 Renton zoning upon annexation of the property included in the proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation. The uses and densities allowed under existing King County zoning are generally consistent with uses and densities allowed under the proposed R-5 (P)zone. Subject parcel is located at the NE corner of SE 136th Street and 144th Avenue SE. The annexation area includes a single parcel (Maplewood Heights Elementary School)and adjacent right-of-way Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 4, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Publication Date: January 21,2002 Account No. 51067 dnspub �° � CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-01-120,A, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton, Utility Systems PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Nonproject action: Proposal would supplant existing R-4 King County zoning with R-5 Renton zoning upon annexation of the property included in the proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation. The uses and densities allowed under existing King County zoning are generally consistent with uses and densities allowed under the proposed R-5 (P) zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Sub�ect parcel is located at the NE corner of SE 136th Street and 144 Avenue SE. The annexation area includes a single parcel (Maplewood Heights Elementary School) and adjacent right-of- way. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 4, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appea�s to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: January21, 2002 DATE OF DECISION: January 15, 2002 SIGNATURES: �� regg i m rma , Administrator DAT Departm nt f nning/Building/Public Works ;� � _ � � � / /S C� �, ,Jim', hepherd,A mini a or � DAT { Community Services Department �' � �`a� /� �� Lee heeler, Fire Chief � DAT Re on Fire Department / dnssignature � � ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMM�TTEE MEETING NOTIC� JANUARY 15, 2002 �� AGENDA To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Jim 5hepherd, Communities Services Director Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Meeting Date: Tuesda� y, January 08, 2002 Time: 9:OQ AM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Ftoom #620 Agenda listed below. Kennydale Lakefront Sewer Improvement (Nishihira) , , The City is proposing improvements to an existing 8-inch diameter, 4,700-foot long sanitary sewer line located in Lake Washington. The lakeline, which currently serves two small residential neighborhoods, is located approximately 40 feet offshore beginning at the north end of Gene Coulon Park and ending at North 40tn Street. The project would install 4 pre-cast concrete manholes at sagging locations to allow access to the existing lakeline for maintenance and cleaning. The manholes (4 feet in diameter and 3 feet in height) would extend 2 to 3 feet above the lake bottom. All project activities would be conducted by floating barge operations and are anticipated to be completed befinreen July 15�' and October 15th of 2002. In addition to Environmental (SEPA) Review, the project requires approval of a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Location: Sewer line in Lake Washington approx. 40 feet offshore; between N. 28�' St. & N. 40th St. Maplewood Heights Elemenfary Annexation (Del Rosario) - , , , Nonproject action: Proposal would supplant existing R-4 King County zoning with R-5 Renton zoning upon annexation of the property included in the proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation. The uses and densities allowed under existing King County zoning are generally consistent with uses and densities allowed under the proposed R-5 zone. Location: Subject parcel is at the Northeast corner of SE 136�' Street and 144�'Avenue SE and includes adjoining right of way. cc: J.Tanner,Mayor J.Covington,Chief Administrative Officer S.Carlson,EDNSP Administrator � A.Pietsch,EDNSP Director � J.Gray,Fire PrevenGon N.Watts,P/B/PW Development Services Director � F.Kaufman,Hearing Examiner L.Rude,Fire Prevention � J.MedzegiaNCouncil S.Meyer,P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director S.Star,P/B1PW Admin L.Warren,City Attomey � "�rr� '�rr� STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: January 15,2002 Project Name: Zoning for the proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Project Number. LUA-01-120,A,ECF Project Manager. Gary Del Rosario Project Description: Nonproject action: Proposal would supplant existing R-4 King County zoning with R-5(P) Renton zoning upon annexation of the prope►ty included in the proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation. The uses and densities allowed under existing King County zoning are generally consistent with uses and densities allowed under the proposed R-5(P)zone. Project Location: Subject parcel is located at the NE corner of SE 136�`' Street and 144f`'Avenue SE. The annexation area includes a single parcel(Maplewood Heights Elementary School)and adjacent right-of- way. (See attached vicinity map) Exist. Bldg. Area gsf.• N/A Site Area: 9.95 acres B. RECOMMENDAT/ON Based on analysis of probabie impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGN/FICANCE NON-S/GN/FICANCE-MITIGATED. X Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGAT/ON MEASURES No mitigation measures proposed. ERC REPORT.doc City of Renton EDNSP Department En mental Review Committee Staff Repon ZONING FOR THE MAPLEWOOD HEI�S ELEMETARYANNEXATION � LUA-OI-I20,A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 15,2002 Page2 of 2 D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those projecf impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing developmenf standards and environmental regulations. Has the applicant adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with fhe proposed development? 1. Earth Impacts: No impacts to earth are anticipated to occur as a result of the proposed legislative action. No geologic hazards are mapped for the subject property. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures proposed. Nexus: 2. Air Impacts: No impacts to air are anticipated to occur as a result of the proposed action. Mitiqation Measures: No mitigation measures proposed. Nexus: 3. Water Impacts: No change to surface water discharge is anticipated to occur as a result of the proposed action. Mitiqation Measures: No mitigation measures proposed. Nexus: E. COMMENTS OF REVIEW/NG DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Commenfs are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Commenfs are attached to this report. Appeals of the environmentai determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 4, 2002. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ERC REPORT.doc � . �� ---� � %11= �j�� j j � ■ �.. � � �1\� . � � � � � : �� /111►�► � � � '�-� a ��/� �� III�� ,- _ �1� � � � ' '� ��i � r ��I� ��F��l �l t111►� �) � �Y su� " F� � �lII�I �IIIII � �� -- � .=�'�i �tlll G �� . - � L • �� w =��,� a - �[�.7 �!Ii7 !� s� � I �III�� i �� : 111111�'`� � �' �.� �a � � C.� ��,� � �� '' a �� tr.7 � � 111111�,� �� G] �G� a `a �a � ��r=� ►//�I�`( ,I'a �1,,,.1 ■ '�� .� , r� . �� - .. �� . ��'1 � ■ i.i� �,�� r. � ■ . �I11�1�o p �II � �� , e�u � " � .�I�H � 111 ■ � � � ' _ ��E� � 111 A �,�:►t� � ' ��= • - ' -� � . '�i ��1� ��_��_� �_�ii■ ��, � ■ :'� �'��;�� , �� .. ��' � � , ��♦11�� 111�� v� t � ��- , � � - � � ��I 111 � - . . ■. � ' ��" �� . � � � . .. i�i � . ' , �� . , , . � ,!; �� , , .� ...� �'�� c� �� . ,. �w, ■■■.. ! � , - I�� !■� ■■: � ��IIII ��j .� : ►��I�� i� � '• � . ■ ■ � �� ■ �� %///�d �� !ir'��y ��; � 1.. � ��►� : � .. � . i��:'��_� :i �� ♦�� t � ► �1�� _ . - � �tl��iti�� %//I�� - auu ■■■��I�� 1D O 1��16i • � � �� 11��► - �t�3� � � �' � ��►��,,V�� i i �� '�� 1 ' �� ; ��.��A, : � �� • � ��,,��► ♦ . � . ��!��!�� s : � - _ . ��t'�v� �� :�� i � ��111�� E�l��,�1�� -- �� ,�� "r� , ! ,�� :�� 1��/�� i� �� I/�1 �,! ¢I��►\- :�� E��•�l;�s� � ._._ _ _ �t� �!� ��►� .` � ' '�� . 1 .�.. �� :�� /�� I� � :C ■ .. o �� .�I ii 7�i� �� ■ •� ..�. t� �� ►�:y .► �i ii �`1► � �� 1►�I �`� "� �r �� .� �� r� �� I�I I �- �.a �� :� �� L��o��3�� I� �� :o iiii��r�! .. .. .�� ■ � ♦ ♦ ♦ � .� .. � �„ ��` ��fy �1111111� �� i►/� �� :�� r �r �� I/� �►1 � .r� ..� . � �� .�� .� �� ►11►j� �� . 1�� •. .� �►�� ..� �� ..-� . •�� ♦ 1:� . � � •� .�, �� .� ��► �. � ��II.�a :.i,.li'� :o ::d �� .�.� ■. lL�t1��L�V.. «//, �� • • • ' • . � ' • • • ' • ' � ' . • • . � • ��. -. � . . 1 : 11 � 11 :� �. ::�< • � � � �� .�,- •�.� �.,� ,. .� �� -:;•«:�:�::,:�;z:,:: '` � � 1� . �.� i� �. , 1 " .. '�'�' � ' " � � Cqmmenb on the u�vironmental nvMw portion of ihe ebove epplicetbn must be submitted in writing lo Gary Del Raerlo,Pro�ect Manager,Economic Development,Nelghborhoods entl Stretepic Planninp Depanment,1055 South Y Gndy Way,R�rrton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on Januery 70,2001. Publ�Hearinga im Me propoaed annexation antl 1.`t � propoeed za�inB wN be ec�eduled at e future tlete. Commente on zoning and the annexetlan unrelated to the �J '� envlraimental review do rwt need to ba received by September 25,2001.CommenU received prior to the Publ�Hearings ♦ � � wlll be torwerded to the City Council.If you heve Queatlons about thia propoeal,or wish to be made e party o1 record and ,��N�� receNe adtli6onel intormatian by mail,please contaet iha pm�ect managec Myone who submits wrmen comments will automatically become a parry of record and wlll be noMied ot any declslon on this project. NOTICE OF APPLICATION CONTACT PERSON: (3ARY DEL ROSARIO (425)430•6597 AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON' P��EINCLUDETHEPROJECTNUMBERWHENCALLINGFORPROPERFILE�DENI7FICATION SIGNIFICANCE(DNS) DATE: 14/2&O1 � 6!h 5 LAND USE NUMBER: LUMO1•1Y0,0.R,ECP � 1241h p� APPLICATION NAME: MMLEWOOD HEIOHTS ELEMEMAfiY ANNE%ATION AND ZONING � ' PROJECT DESCHIPTION: Propoaetl annesetion W approxlmately 9.95 ecres to iha City ot Ranton�hat � Includee ihe 9.5 acre Maplewood Helphta Elemen�ary 3ohool parcel entl atlJaning rlghtaFwey.The p�oceea will Inclutle e public hearinp an tha annexaibn,and two puWic haatlnga an t�e change In zoninq fmm Kinp Counry to tha Cfly of Renton. E�1 51 O L � P� No tlevebpment�a propoaetl ae pe�of ihe roqueet fo!ennexetfOn. N h SI h St PROJECT LOCATION: Subject parcel Is at the Northeast comer of SE 138'"Sireet end 144"Avenue SE antl inciutlea atljdninp right ot way. OP710NAL DE7EHNINATION OP NON-910NIFlCANCE,MRIGATED(DNSM):Aa ihe I.efld ABency,the Ciry of Renton has tletertnined Nat algnXMant environmental Impacte are unlikely to result Irom the propoaetl pro�ect.Therefore,as permitted under Ne RCW 4321 C.110,Ihe Gty M Renton la ueinp the Optbnel DNS(M)p�oceea ro pive notke that a DNS- M Ie likely to be lesued.Comment periotla for t�e proJect entl ihe proposetl DNS•M are ntegratatl Into a aingle comment — — � �d t pn � �� pedo0.There will be no comment period tollowing Me issuenca of ihe Threahold Determinetbn al NornSipmtkence MNipetetl(DNS•M).A 14-tlay appeal period wlll folbw tha kauance of the DNS•M. PERMIT APPLICA710N DATE: 12/iB/2001 ��Tpjjjj�� a NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: 12Y21/2001 � �' Permite/Rev'�ew Requeeted: Environmental(SEPA)ReNew,Annexatbn,Zoninp � i36th � � E 13 Olher Permita whlch may Oe requlred: None Q Requeetetl SWdlec: WA � Locatbn w�ere epplbatbn may � be reviewed: PlanninyHUlMinp/Publk Worka Divieion,Development Servkae Departmen4 � 9t 1055 Soulh Gratly Way,Renton,WA 98055 �� PUBLIC HEApING Three Public Headnqs wlll he schetluletl before Ne Ranlon Cly Council at a leter � date.One Publk HearMg will atldreea Me CounciMa acceptance of the Petit�on to 1 Annex.The other iwo Pu61ic Haeringa will addreea the propoeed R-5 zomnp. One ol the Ma zoninp Publio Hearinge mey be reterred to the Planning Commiesbn. CONSIS7ENCY OVERVIEW: Proposed Mapiewood Heights Elem.Annexation �a�� L�nd Ws: The aubJect site is bcatetl wlthin ihe Residential Rural(RR)Comprehensive Plan "�^O1 Lend Uee Map tlasignatbn.The propoeed R-5 Zone Ia consisten!wMh the policy Exhibit 1:Vicinity Map _�� 0 B 600 intent ot the RR deslpnation. ��,,,,r,,,,,,,,m„y,,,�y ��_�� 1� EnvlronmenYl DOCumMb�het '01 Evelueb tha Propoud Pro�xF. SEPA Checkliet datatl December 14,2001 Renton Compreheneive Plen EIS DavNopmant Hpuletiona Uaed Fa Pro�aet Mitly�tlon: None If you would Iike to be made e perry of record to receive turther Informetion on this proposed project,complete this form and return to:Ciry of Renton,Development Planning,1055 So.Gredy Way,Renton,WA 98055. Propo��d Mitlyetlon Musun�: No mltipation meesures propoeed File No.Mame:LUA-01-120,A,R,ECF NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: nonce or eNvirronr.�wrni,nvrua,nou NOTICE OF ENVIRONMINfPl AGPIlCAT10N 9r;N�'�.._� ` »av+'�`.-c.� z'�,�i�..�ss :� ``." �s�'a:"! d`± B6`�S��tl�14"4�� ``3��...6�j�,� CERTIFICATION �z, �y ery,� F � 3z s.�,,tkp � �" �io��L.!d�`��"F�i'�C'ai'19�v��..=�`4 � �„_r.� �5�� °?e�i�:�.` .� CiU�o��.,..Ye'a�: �' • .F�..��e'� .`��a: `r?:�''i::.i /,1� �3..r_,>,d I, l.l�-'f D� �� , hereby certify that � copies of the above document were posted by me in_��conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on I�C�M'�2 Z�,Zi�t Signed: , .c\ �.�G.� ATTEST: Subscribed a d sworn before me,a Notary Public,in and for e of �� Washington residing in a--r 5 ,on the �,� day of o'� �J,QIRILYPI KAMCHEFF ''�°,�'�;'9'�I�lTN4�NT EXPiRES:6-29�0� , � � ''�'' �.rrp' ; . :>:::::::.:::: .:. ,. ' >;s;'� ` .';`>, , ,.>::::;;:::. , ,::::.;:::;'':::;:';`;;:._::. : :;.;<,;;;.:;;':>::: ::>:>::`" `;;>:;:;:<<:>'>';;:: ;:: ; >:<.;.:<.:: `.`':.:..... ._ .. .. ITY.�3F R�.f�T...1�:.::;;::.....:;: � . ;;.::..... . ..:: .>;;.:.:.:.... .::::; :. .: .. :.:.>... .: _..::>:; .::::::.:.:>.: <:: .:::: ::::::>:.>:::.:::::::::>:::<:>::.:;:::»:<>:»»::>:::>:<::::>;;. .. ;.. :::: _. .: : ;>::::::>: .: :;::>:>;>::>:;::><:><:>:»>::::::>:::::>::::::::;:<:L��t��:�t�plV� :: :>.: : .;: :<_ :::: < :>;':'.: : :: ::":::>::>:: ::::::::::::::::<::>: `;:::::::>:::>''':::: '.':: ;.:: .. . ;;:::; ::::<.:-:..>; .::, :..;L� :..>:. .�N�'.S��II��,;�IV�Sldl�l... ...:: >::;::;:: :;;:.::. :.,;: >:;::::>.::;:: .�..:��._..:�..,;;�'.�._<: ;;::1ii�.>;;;;a�.;,::;.::;�_.:_,:;::�....�.;,..:�j;>:<:;.'<:�.;;..1��:_�>�::::;::`.;:;�,::.:,,...��;';��:;.:::;:::(:�,.:;i�S�::i;,::i'��;:::i;��::;��::.��`'��i��`;�1��:;;:;�:'��.:::��:�;:>�<>:i;:::j`?;::�?�;::��:�..`.`.�._.�.>.:_.(�.<.�..'��.>�.�:::'.�.; :��:��_..:�;_;j:_.. ... � �.� �� rr► �� f�� ;� .:.. .�....,�, 1��t�1:::��<�E°;�<:t3;; ..::. ;::.:>:>:. ;;:;:.<..::;;::::::;:::..:..:.::::..::::: >.:..:: ::::::<:.>::;::.:::..::. »:....<:::.;. .......................... >:::<:>:::::«:::::::::>::::>::::::.;::::><::::>:;::::::><::::::>>::;::::::;::::::::<:>:::;: :::..............................�:::.:.:::..:.�::sc�.. e;:..:�.:e:>::;:::::>::;::;:;::>::::>;;:.:::::<::<>:::::;::::>:::<:><>:::><:>>::>:::>>::::::::::>::::>:>:>>::>::; .................... ............................... .1............... .................................:.::::::::::::::.:.::..:.:..:.::::::::::.::. PROJECT NAME: I►l��l.�.Y�l�d �I�I7fz �%�r,�.�i�!-`�'1�J?�XGI��(Jy� APPLICATION NO: L� A U I " J)�� _ � , �(."r The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER � �� G�s � (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) . , , � ti �r `�Ilr+` . (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER � Appiicant Certification I, ��y �-��d , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: ❑ Title Company Records �King County Assessors Records Signed -----.� Date ��2�/�� (Applicant) NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and swom before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at on the day of , 20 Signed (Notary Public) «::::::.;:;��:�»:>.::.::::>:::?:>::::c�:::..::::::;�:::::«:>::<::c::<:::>�:::::>�::_::::>:::�::;:;::�.::�::<::: :.:.:..:.;.r>�:��,..:;�:....,....,;;;:;��::.>.. �....::...::�..:.:<..:;�.:::.;�. ...: ...: ..�..:..;::.:;.;:.::.::�.:;;�.�:::>:..:.;;:.. ::;;:�. ::.;..;� �:.:.;:�. ..:.;�:.;:��.�.�.;::::;:.::::::c»::;;:_.:�..J �.;.:�..;.:.::��l.. . ::.. . > . ` 91Y�YqI:s.;:,..: � ..�..::_�:;::`.::>:+_.:::::.d:::;i�r::i:::2i's.:';i'.:;i�.i:::i::i::i.^: ._._. ...... ...... ._........:.......:... . :;;:� �:��;:::.::;c:: ' �r i�of....�r�ton. .s�<::.:.:. ;>:«::.. .:..:.;::.;:.::. . ;.::... >::.>:.:>:;;:.;:.;::>:<::::::: ;:>. ;;::>::::<: ;;:.:::.:::.:. :::. .. ; ;>;:.:;::;..:.. ':.:::.i::::.i:.. ::.:.::.:.. :.::.:'..iii::::.:::::':::.::i.::" :':.: i'...::::.�:. :.:...:::..:i:::...':� ::.'::i:i::.i::::::::.::i::::::::.:':::::::::.i.::'.:Y.�:::i:::::�%::.:.:.:i::..:::1::.:.:'::.::::::.:::...:'.::�:`ii::;�'�. .:. �.::::::::::.....:.:::::::i..::"._::::i:::::i::::::::::::::::::.:.:...:::':':i:i::::i:'::.. . : . .. :, : • ,: ;:;:;:.::;:. .C�RTI�IC�TEON:.�1�:�i: >::: ::>. .;::::.:::;. ;»::>;::>::::::,;,:.;:>;>;:;;:::::::<::.:::::;:<:;.:>:>::::<;:;:: �� ;:'::::.� :; ; :::: :.>.:::;:;<.;<:::::::: ;;;::.;:...::..;:;:;;:::::::.:.;..:::.;:.;:;...::.:::.::..:; .::.::>..:::..::: : >::><:;>;>;;;:>><<><»:::... .. .;:::::.:::.;. :.: �>..,.:. .::.��f�F�::.;;;::<:.;;::::.:::.::: :::.. ::;::..:.:,..:::::::; .:.::::..:::::::.....::<:>:::.:,:,:<::. ::> >::..::;::::.><>:>:.:;::>:>::<;.:::>: ::.:::.:::< .. < .,�.:::��€.��:.:::.:: .: . ;:::..;>:.:::;::.::.<<:;::.::>; ::::;::. :::.:>:<::: . .�.::<:::>>...., ..:::::>::::>:::.:>:>�.:.>�:<:>:::::::;::::>::. .:::>�.�;:;::�:.;,>;;:;<�>.:�::;:::?�:;:::::::;:::::s::: .. : :�::�::::::.:::>::<:<::;::::::> �;�<,•,;..:�.: . :.::..::�.::. .. :.:;::>:::;.:::::�:<:>:�.::»:: ��>:.:>:�:;,:: :'..::.;:.:.:...�.>:.:::. ...:.;:.;:.>::::::.).: '.::;:<.::.::..:.. '-:.> .>:.;2:::.,::.::::::::..-:::;:..:i:;:�>::::.:�;:..>::.>.:. . .::.:.;.:'::;::.:':::: :.::.;.:��::.:.:.>'�. .:.::.:... .. ....:>:.�.>::.:..':;>��:.:;.>�.�::.>::::�':�:�> !:>^>::>::':.::':' . .'::o?>::. .>':.:::..:'.>:.. :.: ....:.:::::.:.:.:.:.::.. .'. ::.:.: ::::.:...:::.:'.>';.,'. :. :._::_,:':.>�:::.:. .::.. . . { � :' .> ...:........: :::.: :. .... : . :: ! ' :;"�!''.::.:::::j':':�::.>' r <I:>;.::::::<: ... .Y� .:..: :.�:,� : : ;::�i�r��y�erti�r.th:at::c�QtiGes:o�:.�h�<pra .: �.: ;.`> �� :;:;::<<;_:;:::::; :�.::... >:. . :. ...; . ,.. . ...,::::::.: . : ;;:::.,; '� : ;�� — >::::::.;:;>:.:;;::>::<(��y;Emt�oYee>:...:>::.. >;>::::.:...:..:.;:. .:.. . <::::::<::::.;;,:.;<,..:::::::;-:::.;.;;:::.:... .:. . : : ;;;;;;;...:,:::<.;;:;::.;::;:::;:.;;><:.;.;.::::;:;::;:::;....::;.: :.::;;;:.-,,.; : :.:.... :;:;:;:;:.;::::<:..:<.::::;;.:,:_::.;:.;..,..:. .: ... ; . :: :: :;. ; :..:: ..:.::..::;:. ::;::::::::: .>::: F''t� . < :>:;:< �:::::>:::::: :::::: :::::::»::>:;.:: :: ;��€��<�:;::�::::�.:::. <>:::: .::: ::>;:::. :�ach.l�st�tl:.. .n:.�.:. ;::�wn��: ..;�;::;.:::, :;.:.�::. ..::::._..>::;... .:::>:;::>::><>:;,::: :::<:::::::>::;:> :: : ..:.: .::::: >::;;::>::;::::>: :::>:>::>::>::::>:.:<: :;>:::::>: :::: .::::.:: ::: .:�.:;�.;: .;:: :,: �:: .; :: ::::: :.. :. : : ;:;::::; : : � :.:: ::::: :::::::::: :.: ��...:�,�� :: :::::::.: : :::: �i::.:::..::..:::i::::::::..:i'.:'.i :::.:::::.i:.::..:i:..:::.':�..::::'::.�::• •.::ii.:.'�:::�::::::"::'::.::.:::i:::i_:i:::i:i':::::::..::.'.:::':::,�:::�::::::��'.��' �:i:::'�:.Y:'.:�:::::":':::::::.:'::::::::::::�:.:::::::::'�:::::i::::::::'�:.:::::'�:::�:::':.::.:'::�';L��::�.:;� :::::'::::.:":::::.i:�::.'.:: :::::::.i'._:.i'.:.i'.ii::::. :.:.. . . - . . .:.:...:' ::.:.::. .::.:::.. ...:.�::. :::::..:'.. . :.ii:::.::',:::.:..::.:i::: :.::.':.::::::�:..'::::.':::::::'::':::�.:i::i'::'v::':.�i�'::�::::::'.:::�:��'�: .i::.:.:::�::.;.:.::_ � .::,. :.::'::i:::' .....'::.::::::"::':':''..:��i..:'..:.:::':.::�:': �."::::'.:::i'.: ' .�::.:..::.:.::::":.::...::. . .':�:'.::'::.'.::::::.:.:..:.i'::.:::::.:.ii::'.i:..::.::.::'. '.:::.:':i::: `",��tl��t:;.>:::::; >:.:.: : :. ::-::::::::. .::::>:>:::>::..::C�ate..... :::...::::..::...:.::::::.� O.;Qt�;`':;'::::<:::;:;::::::`:: ::;:.`:`:::`'`:;::::`:::::' >:'>>::"` >'::::::::::::`:::>;::.<'<::::'::':_>:: _. ...... ;:. ::.:. .::..::;:;;::.;..::;.;:.;:..:. .. ...::.:..::.:::..::. : , __. _....... ;::. <:.>: :;:>::>:-:<;: .::.;:::::::,:.:;::.:;. : ;: :: :�<::: _:._:.;:...,:.:.:.:., :::::.:,:.: .: ..::: .... ;::�::;:<.;.:.>;;a>,.` : <::.:tn>:�'r�::t�esid� ;;.. :.;;;::;:>:;:>::::>;;;:.;::;:>::.: .:;:::: .,:::<:»:;>:...:,::;:.;;;;::<.>;.<.::.>::::><:;.:::;>::;:::::;;:>:::.:;;>:>:.:;_:...;:..:..;:;;.;;;:: ,..:::::. ii_:ii��re;m�:a:Nflta, :�ub'�:#a::at�c�.fQ. he..St te.i�:VSlas#� . � A;�"1;.;;:. �'�:::.��b�c�it�ed;and::swo�.:,.:.::::...::.:..:.::r.: :._. :.. .rY_.::...:.. .,.::::::.:. .. �...::: : ::::. .>:.;�: . >.;:�t:: .;::::.:.;:.::: : :><;:::»>:;:;::>::>:::»::>:.:. .;:;::>:.: ;:<;;:;:::::.::,�a:::<:::;.;: .:.:::.::><:.. ::.::::::>:;><;:::>::>>:<:>:::;>.;: ..;;.::::<::>:>::.:>»::>:;: _... ;:.;:>:;:.:.: ;:>::::::::>.;:>:; . .:;.... �..! .: .::�i:.':� �.��:�:.::�::::::::::::....: ..:.. . ♦ .:::�:�.�:�::: F '��:..:. ::�::., � �. �:.::.::::::�:::�:::�:..i.:::....::� .�l �' :'.;�;:.:::. �:., � ,:' F.:::: : ' ��jY�.;:'::_:/:ii::;�_i:;:.. �f . 1;.:., art,h ..�,�.L.,�.,day q ��t9 --�h�..�� ZO�..i::::::.. <::;<..:;:....:;;;.:: .:.::..:::.::::::.: :::...:. ;.:..:...;:<:: .:::.;:::;;;:><;;»::..: -:. ..::..:.....::_:.::::.. ....:.::. ::.::::::.:::::.:..:.:..:::...;.::. <::»:::.::;:.>;;::.:::::::::.::.:::-.-.:. ;. ;:>:<;>::>:::::. >:::<:::;::;:::;:.;;:::>.::::.>:>:::::;:;::>::;.. ;:.;.:; ::::';>::::>::;»:>..:<:>::;:;:::>:.»: : a.::::<>::;:::, :>:.::_:;:::, Si`>;::"ed>::.. .;:;.>. . '.'':;'`<.'.''.:..<:::::<..;.:`;;' .;:%>;'`;. ;>`.>:' ;;< :;:;: ,';:;::::::<::>:::::'::,::;.". ;::... :;.:::;;:::::<:::>:::;:':::::';>:::::%>:':::>`:;;:::::;::`:.,::;::::::::>;; ,':::::;::>;:;'::::::;>:;:: g►�.::: listprop.doc MA�- Rev o3roo My APPOtMTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 2 . , tirr' �rr% HING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS PROCEDURE FOR OBTAINING INFORMATION ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES The City of Renton requires property owners to let their neighbors know of most proposed land use changes. Typical land use proposals requiring notification include variances,platting and site plan approval. The city requires written notice before holding a hearing on the proposed change. The King County Department of Assessments will help property owners in this process. Their Public Information section is on the 7th floor on the King County Administration Building, 500 Fourth Avenue, Seattle. 'They have staff,computer terminals,maps, and other materials needed to identify a11 affected parcels. 1. Identify your subject property and obtain its quarter-section-township-range map coordinates. Use the Kroll books,or the self-service terminals, or ask the County's public information staff for assistance. The terminals and staff are located on the 7th floor of the King County Administration Building. 2. Get a copy of the appropriate quarter section map from the County public information staff,plus a scaled template of the required radius. 'The County can make photocopies if needed of portions of these maps. Map copies may be made on the 7th floor. 3. Locate your subject property on the map,then use the template to identify all adjacent parcels within the required distance. (Adjacent maps may be necessary in case of overlaps.) Determine the Assessor's account number of the parcels from the information included on the map. Public Information staff can assist you in determining the account numbers. 4. You may use the self-service terminals to look up information on individual accounts. The Tax Information screen includes the t�payer/owner mailing address. The Property Characteristics screen and the index browse screens contain the property street-addresses in case you need to contact tenants/occupants where different from the taxpayer. Printouts may be made of any of these screen displays at 15 cents each. _ 5. To Obtain Computerized Address Labels andJor Printouts: Obtain a Batch Request Sheet and Source Sheet(s)from public information staff. Fill out the request sheet and list the pazceUaccount numbers on the source sheet(s). 5.1 Examples are contained in the handbook referred to in Step 3. Return the sheets to County staff who will check them and assign a batch request number. 5.2 Sign an agreement limiting allowable uses of the information to be obtained(see example in handbook). One signed agreement will serve for the entire year. , , , � � � 5.3 The 7th Floor staff will log your complete request and deliver it to King County Systems Services,23rd floor of the Key Tower. 5.4 Systems Services prints labels and printouts on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday nights for requests received by 2:00 p.m. that day. They will notify you (per your request instructions) on the next working day when the output is ready for pickup. 5.5 You must pick up the labels or printouts at the Systems Services office located on the 23rd floor of the Key Tower. 5.6 Payment is required at the time of pickup. Minimum charge is currently $25.00 plus tax. Address labels are 65 cents each,plus tax;printouts are 60 cents per parcel,plus tax. DataCenter/DS 4001.doc Rev 12/Ol bh S�nooth Feed SheetsT"^ Use template for 5160� � � 084710007703 084710007307 152305912601 BARDSLEY DEBRA M BRENDEN ROGER BROMILEY JANEE MARA BARDSLEY JOSEPH P 13224 144TH SE 13621 144TH AVE SE 13309 146TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 152305916701 084710009006 059340003009 DOWNS JOAN M FACILITIES&OPERATIONS CTR HEIDE ROBERT L 13611 144TH AVE SE OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIR 13628 143RD AVE SE RENTON WA 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98055 98059 084710014006 152305905506 152305910605 KAMPHAUS HENRY B &DIANE L KING COUNTY KRIEG JOHN C JR � 14714 SE 145TH PL 500 K C ADMIN BLDG 13617 144TH AVE SE RENTON WA SEATTLE WA RENTON WA 98059 98104 98059 084710008107 084710008008 084710007604 MARUI SHIGEKI NIGHT RONALD R&JANICE A NOYOLA LARRY+JUANA C 624 MOTOMACHI-DORI 4 CHOME P O BOX 6 13226 144TH AVE SE CHUO-K RENTON WA RENTON WA KOBE JAPAN 98057 98059 �� 059340001003 059340002001 084710011507 RATHER ROBERT J+SUSAN R RUTHERFORD FRANK W SMITH JOSEPH A&KATHY L 14241 SE 136TH 13620 143RD SE PO BOX 24792 RENTON WA RENTON WA SEATTLE WA 98059 98059 98124 084710010004 152305910506 084710007505 TARANTOLA JOSEPH&LORNA VERVAIR LINDA A WOFFORD WILLIAM E 5610 SE 2ND PL 14325 SE 136TH ST 13323 146TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 Tracy Romero STEVE BECK 14415 SE 132nd St. 4735 NE 4�ST Renton,WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 n� AVERY� Address Labets Laser 5160� � � Oti�Y ��i � � � '��N'r�,� .. NOTICE OF APPLICATION � AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- � SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: 1 Z/26/01 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-01-120,A,R,ECF APPLICATION NAME: MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY ANNEXATION AND ZONING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed annexation of approximately 9.95 acres to the City of Renton that includes the 9.5 acre Maplewood Heights Eiementary School parcel and adjoining right-of-way. The process will include a public hearing on the annexation,and two public hearings on the change in zoning from King County to the City of Renton. No development is proposed as part of the request for annexation. PROJECT LOCATION: Subject parcel is at the Northeast corner of SE 136�'Street and 144"'Avenue SE and includes adjoining right of way. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: 12/18/2001 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: 12/21/2001 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Annexation,Zoning Other Permfts which may be required: None Requested Studies: N/A Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Three Public Hearings wiil be scheduled before the Renton City Council at a later date. One Public Hearing will address the Council's acceptance of the Petition to Annex. The other two Public Hearings will address the proposed R-5 zoning. One of the two zoning Public Hearings may be referred to the Planning Commission. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: The subject site is located wfthin the Residential Rural(RR)Comprehensive Plan ` Land Use Map designation. The proposed R-5 Zone is consistent wfth the policy intent of the RR des(gnation. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: SEPA Checklist dated December 14,2001 � Renton Comprehensive Plan EIS Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: None Proposed Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures proposed NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL APPUCATION Comments on the environmental revfew po�f the above appiication must be submitted in wr�o Gary Del Rosario, Project Manager, Economic Developr�4�ht, Neighbofioods and Strategic Pianning Departme 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on January 10, 2001. Public Hearings for the proposed annexation and proposed zoning will be scheduled at a future date. Comments on zoning and the annexation unrelated to the environmental review do not need to be received by September 25,2001. Comments received prior to the Public Hearings will be forvvarded to the City Council. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record a�d receive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments wiil automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: GARY DEL ROSARIO (425)430-6597 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION t � 6th St � 124th p� � � a ' t t I O � h PI E 4t St N �h St h St d z w � w d �o "' E 1 nd t 2n t SE 13 � � ¢ Q > � ^ SE 136th E 13 � W N > S 4 � � � 9t � } �t W n Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation o�a��,� Exhibit 1:Vicinity Map �� 0 8 600 e�n.,�.y�r.►�baho�'kSO�°�w �w�uv� � �,,� ———�,,, 1:�6�IVED 37iqYslr]Wl If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project,complete this form and return to:Ciry of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So.Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. File No./Name: LUA-01-120,A,R, ECF NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION ;y `� CITY�F RENTON � Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 26, 2001 Renton School District#403 Facilities &Operations 300 SW 7th Street Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation—60% Notice Project No. LUA-01-120,R,A,ECF Gentlemen: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on January 15, 2002. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at(425)430-6597, if you have any questions. Si rely, Gary Del osario Planning Technician II 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 �This oaoer contains 50%recvcled materiaL 20%nnct r.nnc��mPr � CITY OF RENTON � DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION MASTER APPLICATION OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION(cont) Note: If there is more than on legal owner,please attach an additional notarized EXISTING LAND USE(S): Master application to each owner. 1 Elementary School(Maplewood Heights Elementary) NaME: Facilities & Operations Ctr Office of the Executive Dir PROPOSED LAND USE(S): ADDxEss: 300 SW 7th Street Nonproject action—no development proposed c�cy: Renton ziP: 98055 TELEPHONE NUMBER: NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES(estimated): 50 CONTACT PERSON/APPLICANT EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Residential Rural NAmE: Gary Del Rosario ADDRESS: 1 OSS S Gr1Cly W1y PROPOSED COMPREHENSNE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: No change pro osed c�cy: Renton zir: 98055 EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER: 42S-43O-E)S97 R-4(King County) PROJECT INFORMATION PROPOSED ZONING: R-5 PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: SITE AREA in SQ.FT: Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation—60% 413,820 s . ft. Notice of Intent PROJECT VALUE: N/A IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? No PROPERTY/PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION and ZIP CODE: Subject parcel is bounded by Lyons Ave NE on the east, IS THE SITE LOCAT'ED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF the concurrent Wofford annexation to the north,by 144"' ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? Ave SE(Jericho Ave NE) on the west,and SE 136"'Street None known. borders the south. 13430 144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER: QEVEi..C7i'MENT PLAiVNING CI�"`�=9ENTON 0847100090 DEC 1 � 2001 �EGEI�ED H:\ECON_DEV�EconomicDevelopment\STRATPLN�PLANNING�.4NNEX�MaplewoodHgts\60°loMasterApp.doc\gd LEGAL DESCRIP�N OF PROPERTY (Attach separ�e sheet if needed) See Attached. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply -- City staff will determine fees. X ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION REZONE $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ GRADE&FILL PERMIT $ FINAL PLAT $ (No.Cu.Yds: ) VARIANCE $ (from Section: ) $ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT $ WAIVER $ PRELIMINARY ROUTINE VEGETATION FINAL MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _BINDING SITE PLAN MOBILE HOME PARKS $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $ NO CHARGE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP — See 60% Petition to Annex I,(Print Name) ,declare that I am(please check one) _the owner of the property involved in this application, the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith aze in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify[hat I know or have satisfac[ory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the inswment. (Name of OwnedRepresentadve) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) (Signature of Owner/Representative) My appointment expires: (THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY STAFF.) Ciry File Number: ECF SA R SHPL CU LLA PP FP TP SP RVMP V AAD W FPUD SM SME MHP BSP A CPA TOTAL FEES: $ 35.97 TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED:$ H:\ECON_DEV�EconomicDevelopment\STRATPLN�PLANNINGWNNEX�MaplewoodHgts\60%MasterApp.doc\gd `�.+y '�rr+ MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL— 60% PETITION TO ANNEX AND PROPOSED ZONING PROJECT NARRATIVE The City is in receipt of a 60% Petition to Annex to request annexation of the Maplewood Heights Elementary school parcel of approximately 9.5 acres located at the NE corner of SE 136`i' Street and 144`� Avenue SE. The concurrent Wofford annexation of 43.5 acres adjoins the site to the west and north. The annexation method is direct petition. There have been no modifications to the annexation boundary proposed at the 10% statge. The subject area includes Maplewood Heights Elementary School of the Renton School District on a single parcel. The topography is generally flat. There are no mapped critical areas in the City's critical areas inventory. The northern and easterly boundaries follow the school's parcel lines. The annexation will include the following right-of-ways: 144"'Ave SE (Jericho Ave NE in the city) along the westerly border and SE 136�'Street along the southerly border. The area is designated Residential Rural in the Comprehensive Plan. Consistent with the Land Use map, R-5 zoning is proposed to supplant the King County R-4 Zone with annexation of the subject property. Upon receipt of comments from staff, a public hearing will be scheduled before the City Council to allow public comment on the proposed annexation and zoning. State law requires a second public hearing prior to adoption of zoning for an area outside the city limits. ��LO��p��.P '��q��N1NG °E� � � zoo� ��°��p�D MplHts_ProjNarc60.doc\ M✓ wrr` MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION Exhibit 2 Tracts 14 and 15 of Black Loam Five Acre Tracts, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, Page 101,records of King County,Washington; TOGETHER WTTH that portion of 144"'Ave. SE(Cedar Street) and SE 136"'Street(SE 2°d Place) adjoining; LESS any portion lying within the area of intersection of 144`i'Avenue SE and SE 136`�Street. SITUATE in the northeast quarter of Section 15,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., King County, Washington. ��LOF ��'M��N�N ING "�E� t � c��01 ��'I�E� H:�ECON_DEV�EconomicDevelopment\STRATPLN�PLANNING\ANNEX�IvlaplewoodHgtsUgl_desc.doc � v o �� N E 6th St w 124th PI �� I� �., �, � � h PI E 4t St � ' — N h S t h S t z a� w � w a� a� > Q � � � � � "' E 1 nd t 2n St SE 13 � z Q � > > Q � t � � � 0 � SE 136th St E 13 � �-' � �' S > Q � � `� t P . � S 1 9t I 9t I. > Q � ll, 1 � > � II w � � n t � 2n St. � �, .�, � d Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation �-��-��-�>$j��-�-��,�N►N� i''�'':` .;F-�ENTON Exhibit 1 : Vicinity Map __ ProposedAnnexation � g C00 Boundary vti�0�, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning _ � � ExisGng Corporate � , !� � SueCarlson,Administrator Boundary 1��`'�� oi/ED G.Del Rosazio ��NT� 2�September 2001 � ❑ � �o� C� o � � c� � ❑ Q [� ❑ � fl � a a � � ❑ O � � � � � � � � d / � � � �:. ---E----J � � O � �- � - � ❑ ❑ �� 0 � � �/ J � � � � � � � � Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation Figure 2: Existing Structures �� ProposedAnnexationBoundary Q 200 L�QQ ,�Y ��o� ExistingCorporateBoundary _ v� o,t, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � �O♦ Sue Carlson,ndm;n;sc�aw� P,�i7T177J Existing Structure 1:2 4�� G Del Rosario —�"(�l � ��NT�$ 20 July 2001 \ ' ;I _ �`�-_.. �`�....._... _ _ �.. �� , `. ,i , � - -' ---- _ _ `\, � �i � _ _.�% �� _ ; ;' ;� ' �� .., ` , '. -- !,1 1 . � ( i ; \�, - �:,` ; r `y / 4 ! \4 '� � `_� 1' `\ (� ,._l \ � �� \ ,�.i' �+.M.-----�. _.,. / — — ^•� ��..,.....Jj 1 ��\� � \ t, f- �i` _ L� � 1 � � �...-�..,-, � ,r 1 ( n ,� � � �� '� /)�' � _ _ � � �_.\ t,` \� � v � �_� \ � ` _`! 1 ! '', 4 \ �% -�' � ' � „--" f �. i �..___-. �"_-- �,- \ ��-...._�_.-� ,-".- -__ —�-� �� ._�._ �L/ - _ "� �'-- �' �i � �� /� Y N �f � '` \ _.._ J , ! i �\ / � J/l,--" i. .- _ , ,� .� ,� . � i: , �„ �,. I i �/J ` ( / . ~`...,..� � / � --" -`- - - ,� f/ (i . . ..,_-�-� ._..� � .._..__.. � ,, _,_.....-- � ___......_ -' . ' .--..._....� � , -.-' } � _.'`'-,-..,.-....--�_.�_----_ \"�� / � , ' . ._ -- ,"J , ,.... � �.� ,\ `;t j. ^/:�",�._.� -L '�'' ,t� 1~�� \ r"....` ��t `� ��' \ �-__-___� � � ' i �-:_..� , �' ;� � ,,� , �``� � �. �.�.� s� ,` _„ti � \ r� � � t`�j �'"- � �, 1 �� _ � ` � i �_f < ....�------� s— i, ,�✓� �( ,� .�_ ; —1 ..;_.__.._ - _,I t�� fj �`,,�f``'`~� � �` �' ` '�� j \ .� � i �,� �, r , }. � ��--- ` �� ' ` � :� , � ' ' �` ' _._ �-'�� '7 , �', _�_.---� , 4 _ ,r--� � `. -- �~_ ti\ `, ��, ,� '�_l` /�----`1~�J � . , ` _. -� -/ �.,_ � + , _. r; , , '� �'--1 � �___ � ; ---�,_ �� y --J 7 '",-.." -"_�` __ �,.' ___ -�-� L ,� ^ _ , . _ ___ �� , - \-____ y 1 ` � , �'ti_ ,-_ __-- - _ �-- ; '\, -,-�%' '� " :� , ; � / � ' '� `-` ' i ,;- �` __ � _ �`` �___ ,� / _ I 'S '' ^� �`! / ' ': V.J ,✓ / \ � / O,� / h /,` "—.�.__ �../ V /f 1 ,s '�� y �, 11, /�~ / ",�'.� .. .J .� ! `` � ',\ S\Y ,.. ' _ ~ � �__- �/�� ._ ` i � ` - '�..� , :� :, � ~ \' --� �� .._.. ---- /"? � Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation �a�v��.o��r��r��tviN� Figure 3: Topography o 2�00�� ENTO400 �� Proposed Annexation Boundary Gti�Y o,�, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning ��'�" Existing Corporate Boundary .O� SueCazlson,nan,�o�saac�� -_. — 1m Interval Contour 1:2�40Q��ENJ G.Del Rosario ��NT�� ZO July 2001 '�r✓ �..I City Of Renton ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmenfal Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, fo the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know"or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these quesfions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan fo do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any addit�onal information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to wh�ch you submit this checklist may ask you to explam your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may 6e answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies,plans and programs), the references in the checklist to fhe words "project," "appl�cant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 7. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Non-Project: Zoning of the proposed Maplewood Heights Annexation ��VELOPM'EI+fT PLqNNIfVG 2. Name of applicant:Renton School District#403 c1�Qc�'�NTON DEG 1 $ 2001 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: REC��E� Applicant: Contact Person: Facilities &Operations Ctr Gary Del Rosario Office of tt�e Executive Director City of Renton 300 SW 7` Street Economic Development, Neighborhoods Renton,WA 98055 and Strategic Planning Phone: (425) 430-6597 Maplewood EIVVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Che�st Non-Project:Zoning of the Proposed�lewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 2 of i l 4. Date checklist prepared: December 14, 2001 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): Completion of annexation and adoption of zoning anticipated for the second quarter of 2002. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connecfed with this proposal? If yes, explain. Annexation of the subject property. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. King County Comprehensive Plan Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Draft, Final and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmenta! approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Approval of the annexation of the subject properties is pending. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits thaf will be needed for your proposal, if known. Adoption of zoning ordinance by the Renton City Council. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposed non-project action is the adoption of City of Renton R-5 zoning for the property included in the proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation. City of Renton zoning would supplant existing King County R-4 zoning, with annexation of the subject property. 12. LoCation of the pYOposal. Give sufficient intormation for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal wou/d occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site p/an, vicinity map,and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The subject area is the Maplewood Heights Elementary School parcel and adjacent right- of-way to the south. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rollinq, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Less than 25%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC `�,,� ,,rrr� City of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Project:Zoninq of the Proposed Maplewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 3 of 11 Aiderwood (AgC) gravelly sandy loam (USDA Soil Conservation Service, 1972). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. The City's Critical Areas Inventory maps show no geologic hazards for the subject area. e. Describe fhe purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. N/A. This is a non-project action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. The proposal is a nonproject action. The site currently holds an elementary school. No development is anticipated in the future g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? N/A. This is a non-project action. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. 2. A/R a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. N/A. This is a non-project action. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. N/A. This is a non-project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or contro!emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A. This is a non-project action. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: i) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. The City's critical areas map inventory does not show any. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described wafers? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. N/A. This is a non-project action. 3) Estimate fhe amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or weflands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A. This is a nonproject action. Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC Ciry of Renton Environmental Ch�st Non-Project:Zoning of the Proposed�lewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 4 of 11 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A. This is a nonproject action. 5) Does the proposa!lie within a 100-year floodplain? !f so, note location on the site plan. No portion of the subject area is mapped as 100-year fioodplain. 6) Does fhe proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface Watel'S? If so,describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. N/A. This is a nonproject action. b. Ground Water: 1) VVill ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. N/A. This is a nonproject action. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or ofher sources, If ally(for example: Domestic sewage;industrial, containing the following chemicals...;agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served(if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. N/A. This is a nonproject action. c. Water Runoff(inc/uding storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. N/A. This is a nonproject action. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, general/y describe. N/A. This is a nonproject action. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. Potential impacts that may result from specific development proposals should be assessed and mitigations proposed through the application process. Future development under the proposed zoning would be required to comply with City of Renton Drainage Standards (RMC 4-6-030) 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle fypes of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree:alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree:fir, cedar,pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC ��rr' Wwr✓ City of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Project:Zoning of the Proposed Maplewood Heighfs Annexation December 14,2001 Page 5 of i 1 X wet soil plants:cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NA. This is a nonproject action. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known at this time. d. Proposed landscaping, use of nafive plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the sife or are known to be on or near the site: Unknown. Portions of the subject area are undeveloped and may provide habitat to a variety of wildlife species. Birds:ha wk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals:deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish:bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain The entire State of Washington is included within a migration route for birds, known as the Pacific Flyway. This flyway, as it overlies Renton, is used by a variety of migratory birds, including, but not limited to,the Canada Goose. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. NA. This is a nonproject action. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. NA. This is a nonproject action. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC Ciry of Renton Environmental Ch�st Non-Project:Zoninq of the Proposed�lewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 6 of 11 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmenta/ health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. N/A. This is a nonproject action. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A. This is a nonproject action. 2) Proposed measures fo reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exisf in the area which may affect your project (for example:traffic, equipment, operation, other)? This is a nonproject action. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: fraffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. This is a nonproject action. Existing noise from the elementary school would not expect to change from this non project action 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The subject area includes the Maplewood Heights Elementary School. Adjacent properties are predominantly residential and/or vacant. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No indication of agricultural uses on the site. c. Describe any structures on the site. One school and related buildings. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N/A. This is a non-project action. e. Whaf is the current zoning classification of the site? The current classification is King County's R-4 Zone. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? King County: Urban Residential -4 to 12 units per acre. City of Renton: Residential Single Family. g. !f applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC � � Ciry of Renton Environmenta!Checklist Non-Pro%ect:Zoning of the Proposed Maplewood Heighfs Annexation December 14,2001 Page 7 of 11 N/A. h. Has any part of fhe site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"area? If so, specify. Unknown. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The number of people would not be expected to change due to this non-project action. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N/A. This is a nonproject action. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. l. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed R-5 zoning is consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and applicable policies. 9. HOUSING a. Approximafely how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A. This is a nonproject action. A elementary school currently exists on the property. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A. This is a nonproject action. A elementary school currently exists on the property. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A. This is a non-project action. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; , what is the principal exferior building material(s)proposed. This is a nonproject action. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N/A. This is a nonproject action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or contro!aesthefic impacts, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. Whaf type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N/A. This is a nonproject action. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or inferfere with views? Maptewoal ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Ch.�rst Non-Project:Zoning of the Proposed�lewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 8 of 11 N/A. This is a nonproject action. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A. This is a nonproject action. d. Proposed measures to reduce or confrol light and glare impacts, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? School playground. b. Would fhe proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The proposal is a nonproject action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known or identified in the 1983 King County Newcastle Community Plan. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known or identified in the 1983 King County Newcastle Community Plan. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A. This is a non-project action. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The subject parcel is served by 144'"Ave SE and SE 136th St. b. Is site currenfly served by public fransit? If not, what is the approximafe distance to fhe nearesf transit stop? Unknown. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the projecf eliminate? N/A. This is a nonproject action. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? N/A. This is a nonproject action. Future development under the proposed zoning will likely require the construction of new public and/or private streets and improvements to existing streets. Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC 'irr+'' `�,rr+` City of Renton Environmenta/Checklist Non-Pro%ect:Zoning of the Proposed Maplewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 9 of 11 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so,generally describe. N/A. The proposal is a nonproject action. No water, rail or air transportation facilities are in the vicinity of the subject properties. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. NA. This is a nonproject action. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. Transportation impacts are assessed and mitigation measures applied with review of specific development projects. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Such services may include, but would not be limited to, fire protection and police protection. This nonproject action would bring the Renton School District's Maplewood Heights Elementary school into the City. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A. This is a non-project action. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Unknown. b. . Describe the utilities that are proposed for fhe project, the utility providing the service, and fhe general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. NA. This is a nonproject action. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclos e on my part. Proponenf: Name Printed: l�1}�� d Dafe: �Z��,a� Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Che�st Non-Projecf:Zoning of the Proposed�lewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 10 of 11 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the e/ements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensify or at a fasfer rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposal would not significantly alter the existing range of uses allowed nor the current maximum zoned density and therefore is not anticipated to increase the potential level of these emissions. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: None proposed. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants,animals, fish, or marine life? No significant impacts to plants, animals, fish or marine life are anticipated to occur as a consequence of the proposed zoning action. The proposal would supplant existing single family density residential zoning with similar zoning. Therefore, the potential impacts to plants, animals, fish and marine life is anticipated to be comparable under existing and proposed zoning. Proposed measures to protect or consenre plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None proposed. 3. How would fhe proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? No significant depletion of energy or natural resources is anticipated to result from the proposal. Residential development that may occur under the proposed zoning would be comparable to that allowed under existing zoning. Energy and natural resources required to construct and maintain single family development may be depleted at about the same rate under either existing or proposed zoning. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None proposed. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated(or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat,hisforic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Protection of environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated for governmental protection would not change under this proposal. Proposed measures fo protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None proposed. Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC � City of Renfon Environmental Checklist Non-Project:Zoning of the Proposed aplewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 11 of 11 5. How would the proposal be likely to affecf land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposai would not affect shoreline use. The proposed R-5 zoning implements the Residential Single Family Land Use designation mapped for the subject area in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The range of allowed uses under both existing and proposed zoning are substantially the same— residential or compatible uses. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None proposed. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and ufilities? The proposal is not expected to significantly increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities, since the existing and proposed zoning is similar in terms of potential density and range of land uses. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: None proposed. 7. Idenfify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, sfate, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environmenf. No conflicts with local, state or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment are known. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: �� k�� Date: �21��'�� Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC � November 5,2001 """" Renton City Council Minutes Page 403 OWNERS ASSUME A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S BONDED INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED. Annexation: Maplewood This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Heights Elementary, Jericho accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public meeting Ave NE&SE 136th St to consider the 10% Notice of Intent to Annex Petition for approximately 9.5 acres bounded by the Renton City limits on the east, the northern boundary of , Maplewood Heights Elementary School on the north, by 144th Ave. SE � � � �Z� (Jericho Ave. NE)on the west, and SE 136th St. on the south; Petitioner, Maplewood Heights Elementary. Gary Del Rosario, Planning Technician,pointed out that existing development on the site includes the Maplewood Heights Elementary School of the Renton School District, and related buildings. The site's existing zoning under King County is R-4. Since Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the property to be RR(Residential Rural), applicable Renton zoning would be R-1 and R-5. Water service is currently provided by Water District#90 and fire protection is provided by contract with Fire District#25. Continuing, Mr. Del Rosario pointed out that the Community Services Department noted a shortfall of parks in the area. Explaining that the proposed annexation is generally consistent with City policies and King County Boundary Review Board objectives, he concluded by saying that that no impediments to the provisions of City services to the area have been identified. There being no public comment, it was MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCII.CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETIlVG. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCII.: ACCEPT THE 10%NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX; AUTHORIZE CIRCLTLATION OF THE 60% PETITION TO ANNEX; REQUIRE ADOPTION OF CITY ZONING ON THE PROPERTY CONSISTENT WITH RENTON'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND REQUIIZE THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSUME A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S BONDED INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Piele,R-8 Zoning accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public hearing to consider R-8 (Residential Single Family; eight dwelling units per acre) zoning for the Piele Annexation; approximately 20 acres split along both sides ��.- ��j�p of 142nd Ave. SE(Hoquiam Ave. NE), approximately 600 feet north of NE 4th St. Rebecca Lind,Principal Planner, stated that subsequent to the public hearing on the 60% annexation petition on August 6th,the King County Boundary Review Board approved the proposed annexation on October 23rd. She explained that this is the second of two required public hearings on the proposed zoning for the site. She indicated that the site contains 23 single-family homes and is designated RS (Residential Single Family) in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Continuing,Ms.Lind reported that existing King County zoning is R-4, which allows up to a base density of four units per gross acre(up to six units per acre with incentives and transfer of density credits). Describing the neighboring zoning surrounding the subject parcel, she indicated that the proposed R-8 zoning is appropriate for the site. Ms. Lind pointed out that under current King County zoning, single family homes, townhouses, and/or apartments are � � November 5,2001 Renton Ci[y Council Minutes Page 391 , � � �. . � designation from Residential Rural(R-1 zoning)to a combination of Employment Area Office(CO zoning),Residential Single Family(R-8 zoning), and Residential Options or Residential Planned Neighborhood(R-10 or R-14 zoning). Waiver of filing fee is also requested. Refer to Plannin� Development Committee. EDNSP: Renton Lodging Tax Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Advisory Committee recommended the appointment of Howard Cohen, general manager of Holiday Inn Select,to the Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee to fill the vacancy left by Tim Salley. Council concur. Annexation: Piele, 142nd Ave Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department SE&NE 6th St recommended a public hearing be set on 11/19/2001 to consider R-8 ��" �b(� (Residential Single Family; eight dwelling units per acre)zoning for the Piele Annexation; 20 acres located east and west of 142nd Ave. SE(Hoquiam Ave. NE), south of NE 6th St. (if extended)and west of 144th Ave. SE(if extended). Council concur. Annexation: Honey Creek Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department East,Union Ave NE submitted 60%Notice of Intent to Annex Petition for the proposed Honey ,�� - �y G� Creek East Annexation; approximately 28 acres located west of Union Ave. NE � and south of Siena Heights Elementary School; and recommended a public hearing be set on 11/19/2001 to consider the petition. Council concur. Annexation: Vuong, 13642 SE Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department 16th St �)� ��-'� submitted 60%Notice of Intent to Annex Petition for the proposed Vuong Annexation; approximately 2.5 acres located on SE 116th St.; and recommended a public hearing be set on 11/19/2001 to consider the petition. Council concur. Annexation: Wofford,Lyons Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Ave NE&NE 2nd Ave recommended a public meeting be set on 11/19/2001 to consider the 10% Notice of Intent to Annex Petition for the proposed Wofford Annexation; C�I!� �� approximately 45 acres bounded by Lyons Ave. NE,NE 2nd Ave., 144th Ave. SE(Jericho Ave. NE), and Maplewood Heights Elementary School. Council concur. Annexation: Maplewood Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Heights Elementary,Jericho recommended a public meeting be set on 11/19/2001 to consider the 10% Ave NE&SE 136th St Notice of Intent to Annex Petition for the proposed Maplewood Heights py- �Z�j Elementary Annexation; approximately 9.5 acres bounded by 144th Ave. SE (Jericho Ave. NE), SE 136th St., and Lyons Ave.NE. Council concur. Legal: 2002 Legal Services Executive Department recommended renewal of the contract with Warren, Contract,Warren,Barber& Barber&Fontes,P.S. for 20021ega1 services. Refer to Finance Committee. Fontes,PS Budget: 2002 Annual City of Finance&Information Services Department recommended a public hearing be Renton set on 11/26/2001 to consider the 2002 annual City of Renton Budget. Council concur. Human Resources: Dependent Human Resources &Risk Management Department recommended approval of MedicaUDental Coverage of a resolution which provides medical and dental coverage to eligible dependents Employees Called to Active of employees who have been called to active duty for"Operation Enduring Duty Freedom." Council concur. (See page 395 for resolution.) w.r' '�.ri' �TY �s ,} � �� NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master qppllutlon haa bwn filed a�M aeceptetl wlth fha Devebpmant Servkas DWision of d�e City of Ranton. The tolbwtng bNefiy tleseribas the applkapon and Me meacpry Publie Approvals. PR0.IECT NUMBERINqME: LUA-01-120,A/MAPLEWppD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY ANNEXqTION_ 10X NOTICE OF IMENT PRQIECT DESCRIP'ryON: Proposed annezation o(approxknately 9.5 aaes to the P�ess wMl InduCe e puWk meetinp aM e publk heaMp on Me arma+�etlon.and two publk hearMps on Me uherge�in mnhg hom fOnp County M the CHy of Renton.No davelopment Is P�Pased as part of IM request for annexat(on, PROJECT LOCATION: SubJeU parcel b bounped by Lyona Avenua NE b Me east,SE 136°'Street to the soufh,144°Avenue SE(Jarlcho Avenue NE tn the qty)b tlia west.and follows the wblecl parcel lot Iine M the nwih. PUBUCAPPROVALS: Mnezatlon �Commenfs on Me above applkatlon must be aubmitled k�writln9 to Gary Del Rosarb.Pro�ect Maneger�Econornb ��e�oP�menk 1055 Soulh GtadY Way.Renton�WA 98055.by 5:00 PM on September 25.2001. H you have questions propaal,w wish b be made a parry of record and re�We addifbnal noUfication by maq contact p,h,pel Rosario at(425)430-8597.Myone who submits written comments w�il automatically become e pary,ot recortl anO wAI be rwdfied M any dedsion on tliis Projecl. PLEASE INC�UDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN C/LLLIN6 FOR PROPER flLE IDENI7FICATION DATE OF APP4CATION: September 4,2001 NOTICE OF COMPLEfE qppLl�pTpN: September 13,2001 DA7E OF NOTICE OF APpLICpTION: Seplember 13,2001 +n II �� tM11 � � �0 ��P�qcseEMnaabnBan6ry ��EnqnY�aW��BaMxy It you wadd Ilke b be made a perty of recor0 W recelve fuM�Information on this proposeE PrWa]�complete Ihb/arm and retum to:CHy of Renton,Devebpment Planning,1055 South Gredy Way,Renton,WA 98055. File NOJNama: LUA�01•120AI Maplawood Haiphta El�m�nhry Ann�xatlo� NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONENO.: NO710E OF APVLN;AT�aN CERTIFICATION I, ��Za�� QUC.VY�� hereby certify that � copies of the above document were posted by me in cons icuous places on or nearby the described property on � Signed: � ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me,a Notary Public,in and fo the te of G%�f�� `�'WasT�ingtmz�i'e�ic{itig:�� ,on the�day of • � / , ` " � '; ' `' �lARILYt� KAMCl��FF , , . ` '.F .A�A� � 9�11'AAPt3ibe�T`t�4�t�T EXPiRES:6-2�-0� , �. . . ;; :�> �; , :;� �:_ �...,.�;�� .. , r.r�' �:.>, ' _ . .. .:: ... .. :. >:::.:,:.:;:;:>. ::..;::.:::.>:::: .:. ;..: :.:;:<:;.;- : '. ._ __::::.;:.: _. ,:_.... ;::.< :. .:: ;::: RENTt�I� > : :::: ':: :: >. " ::<:<' :`; ; : >:::: ;:: ::;-: . +CITY�F ;:. _ ;.`:: ,::>::::;:.::::.>«:::.::::... >: ,. t7N : ,;.. >:::: :.. :.::::.::::.>:;:: ':: : . .; IV��i ;: > ;_._ :»; ._..'.. ':: :: ..<.:;; .::.,;.:.:;_:... . �7E�/�,�.Q�'11��VT S��VIC�S E� , , ::;,.:::.::»:::E:'."�:�.:::;::s;;�.:::.�;::;:;;`.:>�:��`�� ::�:;.:1::��...�`:�� .:�:��::::._�■w�. �-�;.;.:;:.::�;:.��.:<:::.:..:.;":,;..::::::�:: ��:::>::;,..�:�:>;:,�:.:»:::�:.:�� ,:��:��::�:::<:':.;;:<.:. ::::.>:::>::.: �:::::�:..>. ��:;:;: .: . ■ .... . . . . ..... ■ .]� :. .:...::�i.�.� �_�:�:��V�F��:��__��i��f:..1��.:.�:�:: :;:::::i':'�..:::-.: :. . - . . .:....:.:::. _: :. :::<:i�.:i:>:>::i�:'::;:.::. ...,, ;; :. . . �::.:....'. ...�....:::....: .. ..::..:.:. . �..:..'.:.': ;..1<.�.>. ' : .... . . C:%:>:''.:..;:::::.:.. . ...�i:.:. . . . ................. .......... ;:>::.....:... -.:...;::;.-_. > >:».��#�m.30D:feef:of the sub'ect::site :>:;`:: ::;::::::' '::::>::>: :<»::' ;:.::::>::<<>>:::::. `<:;`. PROJECT NAME: I�.GL O��VJD��IG��1 , ��l��Y�2��V�h�Q�CI� d� APPLICATION NO: L!/1 f� D� ' J Zv� l�- The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER se� ��`7�GGc1�� /S � (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) � . � � (Continued) ' NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification I, ��'Y Q�.�Q.(��'4�� , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: ❑ Title Company Records C�King County Assessors Records Signed — Date � � � (Applicant) NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at on the day of , 20 Signed (Notary Public) > .. .»,: '.. :,><;,._ :<;:<: <:::,::.: :::>::'.;►,� .;... .:..: .::.. .....::.:::..,.:>.: :.::.:-. <:.::::> ::: . �t�r:�it �f>F��nton�tse�*,: ,'. .': ,;. `; .:. ;,:..; .:::.:.:. . ... :.: .;, .... <::;::..:;... _...:. .... ..-:; >::.> :.:,:_ ; ::.:..:;;_: ; ... :....:....::..:.:. ..;::.>: _ ,;.. ,. ..:::> >. .,:;; ,:. . ,; ; > ` ';...:_.: ;:;::;:-:;.;<: ; ; :;. , ;::::.CERTf�ICAT! ;::.. ;. . ;::;= :: ;:.. _: ;, . >: ;. ,ON+OrF MAIi.�NG ::: I,: ��c�`.: ic,,�, h�reby certifiy that nc�tices of ih�propos�c�.application were.rnai(ed�c� -... .::;. .::<::. ..:< . .;:<:`: ;:::::..:. . ,. ;._ ;;::: ; ;. ">:::;;::::>;: .. �;�R1[�oyrP.4}:::::::-::>;>:'::;: ;i: : ::::::: ;.:. `:: . ,>.: . .::::.;: : ..:... ....: ....:::: :::;. ;>::. :,:: .:. ..:..::.. ::::.:::>.;:..: :::;.: . ....._ .::; :: ,;;; :: .` '::;:::1;'...;,.: ,. ..;;:..:;::.;::;. ; : . ._: .I. ' ...:. . � ' ..... . . .:...: '.::i::�. .:::. ::i.'.::.:'.:'..i:i:i..:. e�.: ::rst �o .�, owne.r..on: , ; P. P... ;: ,5�11�I�� '�.r �� ,,,,,_ C�c`i��': y�. > ..:,....::. ... ;. . . .::. ;:.:.. . .:... . . . ;.`:. ,-.. -:..: :::. ,:. . _ ��'� `�'�, t { ' >:>:: ::::..::> <, _,>' , ;,.; c; ::;;:; : : :: .,..:. ;,::.._:;:. . : : ; NC? ,..:. :. :. ;. . , <.. :: .: . : ;;: :::.;.::;:.: , , .. ..:> .. ;: :::.:: ,. :.. ; ::. :. . :......::. ;... . _ ; : . :... . ;: �k. ST::'�: bseribed_>and_:swbrn.b��ore ';a:Notary Public;:in arid';for:il�e:State:o�;USlasEi�n tari r�sldi'n `: `�? ` �`� day o€ ��,.._._ a �`� on#he :. ;.: ;; - . � ;;.2U� ;.;: .:. - .<., . ::::- ; - ;: <:;:;. - .. :: ;> .. ;.: ; : ,. ;:. : Signed::`:;:>::;` ,<;`':». ;>.. .::;.;:; .:�'�'a ; _ : ` :::>: .. ..:`. :.::':>.:.::;::::: <>.. ::::::.:::':: :;.:::> :...`::::''.:,: . .. . ... listprop.doc REV 03/� 2 Smooth Feed SheetsT'" Use template for 5160� " ' 'pr, w.� 084710007703 084710007307 152305912601 BARDSLEY DEBRA M BRENDEN ROGER BROMILEY JANEE MARA BARDSLEY JOSEPH P 13224 144TH SE 13621 144TH AVE SE 13309 146TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 152305916701 084710009006 059340003009 DOWNS JOAN M FACILITIES&OPERATIONS CTR HEIDE ROBERT L 13611 144TH AVE SE OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIR 13628 143RD AVE SE RENTON WA 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98055 98059 084710014006 152305905506 152305910605 KAMPHAUS HENRY B&DIANE L KING COUNTY KRIEG JOHN C JR 14714 SE 145TH PL 500 K C ADMIN BLDG 13617 144TH AVE SE RENTON WA SEATTLE WA RENTON WA 98059 98104 98059 084710008107 084710008008 084710007604 MARUI SHIGEKI NIGHT RONALD R&JANICE A NOYOLA LARRY+JUANA C 624 MOTOMACHI-DORI 4 CHOME P O BOX 6 13226 144TH AVE SE CHUO-K RENTON WA RENTON WA KOBE JAPAN 98057 98059 Q0000 059340001003 059340002001 084710011507 RATHER ROBERT J+SUSAN R RUTHERFORD FRANK W SMITH JOSEPH A&KATHY L 14241 SE 136TH 13620 143RD SE PO BOX 24792 RENTON WA RENTON WA SEATTLE WA 98059 98059 98124 084710010004 152305910506 084710007505 TARANTOLA JOSEPH&LORNA VERVAIR LINDA A WOFFORD WILLIAM E 5610 SE 2ND PL 14325 SE 136TH ST 13323 146TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 �,� AVERY� Address Labels Laser 5160� �"r '"r DEVELOPMENT SiRVlCES cirY oF RErvroN Annexation Review Form �� { � �� [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60%Annexation Petition ��rv.c�1 ,�� v� �o TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Location : Subject parcel is bounded by Lyons Ave NE on the east, the concurrent Wofford annexation on the north, by 144th Ave SE (Jericho Ave NE) on the west, and SE 136th Street borders the south. The address is: 13430144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: Comments Due: General Information Area : 9.5 Street length : 627 linear feet (existing) Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (existing development) Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation � Reviewing DepartmenUDivision: � A'h- �4/.�?-�� 1. As proposed, does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your departmenUdivision? �`� 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area?��GE��1,��#�b��s,�,�G��v�'�L 1✓ d.s;� � ��ev:�i��r-!� �G�� /ls�l ��"" �EVELOPMEN'f P(.qNNItVG� / ��• S 1G�lk'�c/L �G�� CITY OF F�f��tTON ��G��i'�� '��i��, SEP o�ao�.� RECEIVED co�er> � � 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? �I�� _ �+-��,+- �S �u,� �c.L (�.T`l� ��2��l� l i�r�-�1�0 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �o,��j �,� m 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �� - ��-�� -� ��` �.a�� -�-b fi��--�-r-�� General recommendation and comments: �o � W ��'{,�- ��6� W �`� t—�7 ��t�-� b� � � �'�'� � � � �U�� / �_._ur��,,,� �p�" �� b��'��1��'�- Signa ure: � - Date: ,_,:'.,i!1,j `MIYr' "r/� Annexation Review Form [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60%Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Location : Subject parcel is bounded by Lyons Ave NE on the east, the concurrent Wofford annexation on the north, by 144th Ave SE (Jericho Ave NE) on the west, and SE 136th Street borders the south. The address is: 13430144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: Comments Due: General Information Area : 9.5 Street length : 627 linear feet (existing) Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (existing development) Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation � Reviewing Department/Division: ��-e �� 1. As proposed, does this annexation represent any'unique or significant problems for your department/division? , 1� G� �' �,.� �.. SEP 1 4 ��i , � [._ �-�,,.. -- . ,. �- - _.J ,_� 'I 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in ezi`stfrtg�-i�#t.a,Strvctur� or servi e provision to the area? OP d ��C�.�,�F�P�NN/N NTpN G SEP ��'2001 R oC�VED � � 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? ��S 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? /�J'� �� .S��2 v/�c.� d�� .�-e,Gt,.� 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �D , General recommendation and comments: Signature: �^� J� Date: � 7 d �.rw ��rw+ �/}- (q�G� DGYCL�f'IVr�'`4 � C"'L�Y�lJE�7 CITY OF RENTON Annexation Review Form SEp 1 -� 2001 ( X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60%Annexation Petii��C.EIVE� 1�, TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Location : Subject parcel is bounded by Lyons Ave NE on the east, the concurrent Wofford annexation on the north, by 144th Ave SE (Jericho Ave NE) on the west, and SE 136th Street borders the south. The address is: 13430 144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: Comments Due: General Information Area : 9.5 Street length : 627 linear feet (existing) Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (existing development) Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation � ti Reviewing DepartmendDivision: 1. As proposed, does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? � VO 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or servi[��ovision to the area? C ry F�p� NT�Ni,yG � SF� °��p��. 1 ' h � �.''�°,� ��. (Over) � � 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your departmentldivision? �S 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �o�cr� 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �lv General recommendation and comments: � � Date: � 1�U1 Signature• y Y �'�` O * �� ♦ �u ��'N'ro� NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The foilowing briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-01-120,A / MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY ANNEXATION— 10%NOTICE OF INTENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed annexation of approximately 9.5 acres to the City of Renton. The process will include a public meeting and a public hearing on the annexation, and two public hearings on the change in zoning from King County to the City of Renton. No development is proposed as part of the request for annexation. PROJECT LOCATION: Subject parcel is bounded by Lyons Avenue NE to the east,SE 136'h Street to the south, 144th Avenue SE(Jericho Avenue NE in the City)to the west,and follows the subject parcel lot line to the north. , PUBLIC APPROVALS: Annexation Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Gary Del Rosario, Project Manager, Economic Development, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on September 25, 2001. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Mr. Del Rosario at(425)430-6597. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPIICATION: September 4,2001 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 13,2001 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: September 13,2001 1th yy 0 A 51 N 5t BiA St �� tln � � Zn t SE I e � »+u t � a�em �� 4 � � � � � �Proposed Mnexation Boundary ��Existing Corporate Boundary If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton,Development Pianning, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. File No./Name: LUA-01-120,A/Maplewood Hefghts Elementary Annexation NAM E: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: NOTICE OF APPLICATION Smooth Feed SheetsT"" Use template for 5160� 084710007703 '�710007307 1��2305912601 BARDSLEY DEBRA M BRENDEN ROGER BROMILEY JANEE MARA BARDSLEY JOSEPH P 13224 144TH SE 13621 144TH AVE SE 13309 146TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 152305916701 084710009006 059340003009 DOWNS JOAN M FACILITIES&OPERATIONS CTR HEIDE ROBERT L 13611 144TH AVE SE OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIR 13628 143RD AVE SE RENTON WA 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98055 98059 084710014006 152305905506 152305910605 KAMPHAUS HENRY B &DIANE L KING COUNTY KRIEG JOHN C JR 14714 SE 145TH PL 500 K C ADMIN BLDG 13617 144TH AVE SE RENTON WA SEATTLE WA RENTON WA 98059 98104 98059 084710008107 084710008008 084710007604 MARUI SHIGEKI NIGHT RONALD R&JANICE A NOYOLA LARRY+JUANA C 624 MOTOMACHI-DORI 4 CHOME P O BOX 6 13226 144TH AVE SE CHUO-K RENTON WA RENTON WA KOBE JAPAN 98057 98059 Q0000 059340001003 059340002001 084710011507 RATHER ROBERT J+SUSAN R RUTHERFORD FRANK W SMITH JOSEPH A&KATHY L 14241 SE 136TH 13620 143RD SE PO BOX 24792 RENTON WA RENTON WA SEATTLE WA 98059 98059 98124 084710010004 152305910506 084710007505 TARANTOLA JOSEPH&LORNA VERVAIR LINDA A WOFFORD WILLIAM E 5610 SE 2ND PL 14325 SE 136TH ST 13323 146TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98059 98059 98059 �� AVERY� Address Labels Laser 5160� rrr�' �,,,� CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION MASTER APPLICATION OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION(cont) Note: If there is more than on legal owner,please attach an additional notarized EXISTING LAND USE(S): Master application to each owner. 1 Elementary School(Maplewood Heights Elementary) NAME: Facilities & Operations Ctr Office of the Executive Dir PROPOSED LAND USE(S): ADDRESS: 3OO SW �Itll St1'eet Nonproject action—no development proposed c�cy: Renton z�: 98055 TELEPHONE NUMBER: NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES(estimated): 50 CONTACT PERSON/APPLICANT EXISTING COMPREHENSNE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Residential Rural NAME: Gary Del Rosario ADDxEss: 1055 S Grady Way PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ciry: Renton ziP: 98055 No chan e ro osed EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER: 42S-43O-E)S97 R-4(Kin Count ) PROJECT INFORMATION PROPOSED ZONING: R-5 PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: SITE AREA in SQ.FI': Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation— 10% 413,820 s . ft. Notice of Intent PROJECT VALUE: N/A IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? No PROPERTY/PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION and ZIP CODE: Subject parcel is bounded by Lyons Ave NE on the east, IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF the concunent Wofford annexation to the north,by 144''' ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? Ave SE(Jericho Ave NE)on the west,and SE 136�'Street None known. borders the south. 13430 144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER: DEV 0847100090 C��OF��C,��y �C7/�'��G S�p��2�01 A��F D H:�Econ_dev�EconomicDevelopment�Stratpin�PlanningW NNEX�MaplewoodHgtsUvlasterApp.doc\gd LEGAL DESCR�TION OF PROPERTY (Attach s�arate sheet if needed) See Attached. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply--City staff will determine fees. X ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION REZONE $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ GRADE&FILL PERMIT $ FINAL PLAT $ (No.Cu.Yds: ) _VARIANCE $ (from Section: ) $ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT $ WAIVER $ PRELIMINARY ROUTINE VEGETATION FINAL MANAGEMENT PERMTT $ _BINDING SITE PLAN MOBILE HOME PARKS $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $ NO CHARGE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I,(Print Name) ,declare that I am(please check one) _the owner of the property involved in this applicalion, the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorizadon),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mendoned in the instrument. (Name of Owner/Representative) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) (Signature of Owner/Representative) My appointment expires: (THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY CTI'Y STAFF.) City File Number: ECF SA R SHPL CU LLA PP FP TP SP RVMP V AAD W FPUD SM SME MHP BSP A CPA TOTAL FEES: $ 35.97 TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED:$ H:IECON_DEV�EconomicDevelopment�STRATPLN�PLANNINGWNNEX�MaplewoodHgtsUvfasterApp.doc\gd � ��w+ MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tracts 14 and 15 of Black Loam Five Acre Tracts, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, Page 101,records of King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH those portions of 144th Av�nue SE(Cedar Street)and SE 136`�' Street(SE 2°d Place) adjoining; LESS any portion lying within the area of intersect��n of 144`�'Avenue SE and SE 136`�Street. SIT'UATE in the northeast quarter of Section 15,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M.,King County, Washington. H:�FILE.SYS�I.ND\01\0032.doc 'rrr'' ti,.,• MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL- 10% NOTICE OF INTENT PROJECT NARRATIVE The City is in receipt of a Notice of Intent petition to request annexation of approximately 9.5 acres east of 144`" Ave SE, west of Lyons Ave NE and south of NE 2nd St. The concurrent Wofford annexation of 9.5 acres is directly to the north. The annexation method is direct petition. The subject area includes Maplewood Heights Elementary School of the Renton School District on a single parcel. The topography is generally flat. There are no mapped critical areas in the City's critical areas inventory. The initial boundary will include 144�'Ave SE, Jericho Ave NE in the city, along the westerly border. Lyons Ave NE, along the easterly portion is already within the city limits and the Wofford annexation borders the area to the north. The area is designated Residential Rural in the Comprehensive Plan. Typical zoning within the designation is R-5. Zoning will be addressed at later point in the process, after the proponents have submitted a 60%Petition to Annex. Upon receipt of comments from staff, a public meeting will be scheduled before the City Council to allow public comment on the proposed annexation. Additional lands may be added to the annexation proposal if interest is expressed prior to or during the public meeting. If the Council amends the annexation boundaries, staff comments on the modified proposal would be requested at the 60% Petition phase of the annexation. OF` c,�p'�� °'";�,'�,� SFpO ��r°��/'�� R�� '��df MplHts_ProjNarr.doc\ �/"F O ;�,�•.��Ij�� II �� - �'�_ _ � J .�- � ��►�► ` � � '.�.' : �i� ��►� ■ . :� ��J . � � � ■ ,� E: � �' r �1'J � � L�1 , �� .n�C►� . :1�' ��F�ll �l q11I/ G7 � �u's►9� ' � ��,+ �1111� �L"� � . - �� • �� ^� � ■:C w' �� s� 7 ��i7 �!ri7 j !� s� � � �'� I -� ' �� t� iE� � � 111111� � I/4�� , �' � �� ra �a � J ! �� ``, �� -� � �`1 ��7 � `� ��s+�/�J � ��C� �/%I�� ■ ,�,.,�.'�■ ■ ■ .. c� . f�1 � ■ �ai� �� r: � �■ I ��1111�� .� � v� �� u ' � �1�� ; 111 ■ 1■��! � i _.,.__ �r��t�� 111 � �'�� :: ' , ��= • ' ' -� � . � 1"�� I�I�) ��III■ ��, �� !� , ■ .� �� I� ��III: =�:� ��„ . .. , �1111��11 111■■ 1.�� t � ��1��- , � � - rq r. ��1� - " ■■ � � ' �� " �� r� � . ■ . �� ■ . .. i�i � . � , �� . , � , � �� ' , ,� .� .�� c� �� .. � ��; �� ,. ■:� �.. , �� .� : - ►�� • . �111/1 � i� .. . . _ .�� ., � ,. � �I��.�� .. �w■■� ;�; � 1.. � ��d ; � �� • .r'�; � �1=� ►� ��II � ��I� ��1�� ;. - �� i�. � ► �I�t� _ . �11��i��■� � �►�� %/11/�� - �uu ■■■��I�� :�D O 1�■��6� • � � - . �� 11��■�► � �� w��'�� i � 1 ■ .�� ,�� ♦ � `� , i� . �� , ,,,,,��v;��;� = ;■ = =: . � �b1, ��;w� • � .�� _ ■�� v � ♦ �� p� t ♦ � ��,�'�� .��r �� ' � ��III�� E�?�I��i�1�� i ,,��,,, ' � � Q�1��I►�'' ,�� 1��/�� I/ 1 �.,; _ ..�::� y :� i,��,�,��s� � _. _ _______ ■r� �� ► ► � ♦ , ��I�� ...� �� C�� /�� ' �� ' � �� :►%i �i�=*�1►7�� ■ � �� c ��►��- ��1� ' ` �� ■p �� r �� %�1 � ��/I�� /I►� �I��'1i �� i �i ii ii i �� tL��C�l�� I � �� r�� , �� ■ , ��i �,N �J �o �� r �� uGtiL'� ,,�� tf� �1111111� �� ; �►/� �� i� i� �� 1111 ��II� :►�1i� .� � . �� ... . , �-�� I� � 1►� . �i� :� �� :i�� C� C� C� :� ��► ►�� I��a �i i■li■'� io ::d -�C C� �D �! !/_��ti��i�:.. �(//, ' • � • - • . • - • • • - • - ' - . • , - . • • .,. -, � . , � : � � . � � :, ,. . �:;:.::�:::::;:::::::::::<:::::.:::::::>::�::::::: ;.>;;.:::>.:;.::.;:, '� .�.�� .,�� •�.. ��. ,. .� �� . . � :. �. � • � � � ��., �' � - �, � � I I `{ J� �o� �u o � � r� � ❑ r,�.� � ❑ � � � a � � � ❑ 0 � � � � o � � � d / � � � � �� O ❑ � � � ❑ o 0 0 � � C� � � � � Q� � � 0 Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation Figure 2: Existing Structures � ProposedMnexationBoundary Q 2�0 400 �� E�cisting Corporate Boundary Gt0„�, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning .� , s,�c�ison,na��;s�wr P,�T17777J Existing Structure 1:2�L�QQ G.Del Rosazio �(1!� ��NT�$ 20 July 2001 �,' _ . . � � , ' � ��I �� ,�' ' _ ,,,,,r , .,., - \ _ , _ C� . � . ;, � r � � . � - � � -� , � . _ _ _.___._ , _____-. �� ^ � - � � � � - � � .�� c� � ��.� 4� � ;: � ; - , � ` � ; .� _ , a � � � . . _ - ; � �� '�____� - � , . - � C� ' � � � . . � ��o � Q�, _ - - � � � , � , e� ` �� . ._ 1 _ � , Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation Figure 3: Topography � proposedMnexationBoundary � 2�� 40� �t Y ,{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning �"�"�� Existing Corporate Boundary �O• SueCazlson,Administrator �.G `too G Del Rosario 1 m Interval Contour � ��NT�� 20 July 2001 ''�"' ".rr` Annexation Review Form [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60%Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation Location : Subject parcel is bounded by Lyons Ave NE on the east, the concurrent Wofford annexation on the north, by 144th Ave SE (Jericho Ave NE) on the west, and SE 136th Street borders the south. The address is: 13430144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 Date Circulated: Comments Due: General Information Area : 9.5 Street length : 627 linear feet (existing) Assessed Value : $5,146,600 (existing development) Estimated Population : Current Uses Residential : Commercial : Industrial : Public : Elementary School Comp Plan Designation : Residential Single Rural Future Uses: : No change proposed Future Po ulation • Reviewing Department/Division: 1. As proposed, does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your departmenUdivision? 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? D EVC,�'O��PCAN ��QNN�yG SEP��?0�1 c F�VE� � � 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logicai e�ension of services provided by your departmenUdivision? 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) General recommendation and comments: Signature: Date: CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION MASTER APPLICATION OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION(cont) Note: If there is more than on legal owner,please attach an additional notarized EXISTING LAND USE(S): Master application to each owner. 1 Elementary School(Maplewood Heights Elementary) NAME: Facilities & Operations Ctr Office of the Executive Dir PROPOSED LAND USE(S): ADDxEss: 300 SW 7th Street Nonproject action—no development proposed c�cy: Renton ziP: 98055 TELEPHONE NUMBER: NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES(estimated): SO CONTACT PERSON/APPLICANT EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Residential Rural NaME: Gary Del Rosario aDDxEss: 1055 S Grady Way PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: No change pro osed c�cY: Renton ziP: 98055 EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER: �I-ZS-43O-6S97 R-4(King Count ) PROJECT INFORMATION PROPOSED ZONING: R-5 PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: SITE AREA in SQ.F'I': Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation—60°Io 413,820 s . ft. Notice of Intent PROJECT VALUE: N/A IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? No PROPERTY/PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION and ZIP CODE: Subject parcel is bounded by Lyons Ave NE on the east, IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF the concurrent Wofford annexation to the north,by 144"' ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? Ave SE(Jericho Ave NE) on the west, and SE 136"'Street None known. borders the south. 13430 144TH AV SE RENTON 98059 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER: ��O� ��,��;�6�� 0847100090 0� �EC 1 S 2�� . T- , , ,;�p;":�,� '"J fY i.�a4� H:\ECON_DEV\EconomicDevelopment�STRATPLN�PLANNING�ANNEX�MaplewoodHgts\60%MasterApp.doc\gd LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach separate sheet if needed) See Attached. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply -- City staff will determine fees. X ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION _REZONE $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ GRADE&FILL PERMIT $ FINAL PLAT $ (No.Cu.Yds: ) _VARIANCE $ (from Section: ) $ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT $ WAIVER $ PRELIMINARY ROUTINE VEGETATION FINAL MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _BINDING SITE PLAN MOBILE HOME PARKS $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ _EXEMPTION $ NO CHARGE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP — See 60% Petition to Annex I,(Print Name) ,declare that I am(please check one) _the owner of the property involved in this application, the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects we and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in[he instrument. (Name of Owner/Representative) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) (Signature of OwnedRepresentative) My appointment expires: (THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY CTTY STAFF.) Ciry File Number: ECF SA R SHPL CU LLA PP FP TP SP RVMP V AAD W FPUD SM SME MHP BSP A CPA TOTAL FEES: $ 35.97 TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED:$ H:IECON_DEV�EconomicDevelopment�STRATPLN�PLANNINGWNNEX�MaplewoodHgts\60%MasterApp.doc\gd MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL— 60% PETITION TO ANNEX AND PROPOSED ZONING PROJECT NARRATIVE The City is in receipt of a 60% Petition to Annex to request annexation of the Maplewood Heights Elementary school parcel of approximately 9.5 acres located at the NE corner of SE 136"' Street and 144`� Avenue SE. The concurrent Wofford annexation of 43.5 acres adjoins the site to the west and north. The annexation method is direct petition. There have been no modifications to the annexation boundary proposed at the 10% statge. The subject area includes Maplewood Heights Elementary School of the Renton School District on a single parcel. The topography is generally flat. There are no mapped critical areas in the City's critical areas inventory. The northern and easterly boundaries follow the school's parcel lines. The annexation will include the following right-of-ways: 144"'Ave SE (7ericho Ave NE in the city) along the westerly border and SE 136�'Street along the southerly border. The area is designated Residential Rural in the Comprehensive Plan. Consistent with the Land Use map, R-5 zoning is proposed to supplant the King County R-4 Zone with annexation of the subject property. Upon receipt of comments from staff, a public hearing will be scheduled before the City Council to allow public comment on the proposed annexation and zoning. State law requires a second public hearing prior to adoption of zoning for an area outside the city limits. '=s�'V�LC713itiryc;,9i o .(�f O�r�'�-r-��°i�"�V`i:1 �vi DEC � � �=�a�� `;��,��:� , `;Q�`��,°��=� M plHts_ProjNair60.dce\ > � Q � �--� � � � N NE 6th St 124th p� w �� Q � � � � �� ' E 4t St Q _ _ � � h PI N h St h St z a� w � w > � Q � -,--� � � � �' E 1 nd t 2n St SE 13 � z Q � > > Q � � � � � 0 � SE 136th St E 13 � �' � °' S > Q � � �- tf P . � S 1 9t 1 9t I. Q � '��, 1 � > � 'I �, i� n t — — �, � � 2n St. _,__. � � Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation ��TY}c�;,H��;EL�. Exhibit 1 : Vicinity Map �_ ProposedAnnexation Q g� 1600 Boundary ._ t�Y o Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning EXIStIII CO orate VOd' Sue Carlson,Administrator w�w i �w 9 � + �"('�t�,,tiµ.»,,�� G.DelRosario Boundary :.�j�V�.,r,-,+a, ��NT�$ z�September2001 ❑ �7 0� c� o � � � � ❑ � [��-- ❑ � fl � a a �' � o 0 � ❑ � � � � � � a � Q � s � -�--J � d— � ❑ � _____� _ � ❑ o c� O � � � / � � � � � � � � Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation F ig u re 2: Existi ng Stru ctu res �� Proposed Annexa6on Boundary Q 200 4.QQ ,�Y �i�� ExistingCorporateBoundary vO,t, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � � � Sue Cazlson,Administrator P,�r7T/T�1 Existing Structure 1.'Z (�o 0 G.Del Rosario —Yfl� � �FNTO 20 July 2001 �� . �. � ;1� - � ``---'1 \ J ___.., � � _ � �l 'J f' ~�\ 7 � �i � :�� %...' 1 .,.�, � i , Y ' % �+ ++ , I l � _� ; ~.� r- -�-; \ �., �____ ___ � -- '`� __-� �� ,i ! ` j " .--.... _ '�� ', - -- v� - �� I / I � ' �`t � , — ,' $ /` _ "\ ...\ �- ` '� �% / �. i \ ` \ ",J ! f,� y.;' Li : - � � /_,� , : ,. � . ; � `� j',.._ --- —__� '-� �_�; � ` --- - - �./ _r - — -- r �� — �.,�_ __-��,=/' \'� t,, � A _ __ 11, , ... -- l , �. __.` � / ....__. -- -. -.._ \�''�...� ' " ry'J � r-� � �r t. , �..._.. _ � � _ -- �-� � � �-, _ ! -__._ -•� _ ' _ „� , ------_. , _..- -.. f _. .. - , � ~----._...._._—�.,� \\ 'j \ / ,, �' /� ''�-'_ ..''�' t� �� } '„" �'• /� i ' ' - _.__----�_ � ��. � t _ `� J ,;��-� � i � 1 �� `lY ' �,; � �� . -- � n i �. . / f... \ i�. • f,,,.�'-�; '.l f, , {q `, 4 `�./ \ , ` ` t tl , - ,./! _ _ �\ `-� �� 1 \1 , ..... � f I >-._.__'_._:. _ ' t /�J? J \ � . --\` i, � {"4y--..✓ ��\ � \ ��/ r�� ; j / �.. _ ;� \ It i /; /j' - �' l f __._�_ --'""- / , ' � ' � __— .�_. _ .�-".._... ....___. —. �.� i i,� ;i �l , � t r .,` ^ i 1 � J I� _{ \�., '_ .--� ��...✓% \.�-�.-_"",�,__ ___-J ?+ �"._ � J_,� " �"��. ,-----• ,----- --_� �a._ ,--! � t�\. � yi r "' -— �` ' _ ,----... ____ , __...._. • � _ _- �� ' -_.� '� � ---- �__ _ � . . , . �_ .,=-- - ' �-- `\ % _�:�( \ fj � / _ � �, � � , ,� ' ' , ^ Ir'/ -___ _ , E � ` ;; �� /� �., � -----� � ,� _ —� ,20�` ,_._.._ — _ �`� �` � \ .___.. \ , �L. ,,-- ` t� � � ., �.._ � � i'. �., t ` _ 'L. -- - ,- Proposed Maplewood Heights Elem. Annexation �°��;��f;��cs�� F i g u re 3: To pog ra p hy �� proposed Annexation Boundary � �LC' 1 � � 400 .�Y �� Existing Corporete Boundary Q v��, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning •�; . � . sue Carlson,na�nts��r -- 1 m Interval Contour 1:��4��r'°�:�� G.Del Rosario �i�NTO� 207u1y2001 MAPLEWOOD AEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION Exhibit 2 Tracts 14 and 15 of Black Loam Five Acre Tracts, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats,Page 101,records of King County,Washington; TOGETHER WITH that portion of 144`h Ave. SE(Cedar Street) and SE 136"'Street (SE 2°d Place) adjoining; LESS any portion lying within the area of intersection of 144"'Avenue SE and SE 136`�Street. SI'I'UATE in the northeast quarter of Section 15,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,King County, Washington. -'y�/�iUir�NR��'�-3��' �ITY O�i"��iVTOAIf�nrLrU DEC 1 g ,��1:�� ,�� .. .:L�� H:�ECON_DEV�EconomicDevelopment�,ST"RATPLN�PLANNINGWNNEX�1VIaplewoodHgtsugl_desc.doc . _. , City Of Renton ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmenfal agencies use this checklist to determine whefher the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know"or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of fime or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information fhat will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explam your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete fhis checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicanf," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Non-Project: Zoning of the proposed Maplewood Heights Annexation '-��''`�LCbrlV?�:::;t :�:�i��i�fii�i:a 2. Name of applicant:Renton Schooi District#403 �'!�Y��;��,�:��v DEC1 � �� 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: ��`�«��"^�i °� �,-� A licant: Contact Person: � 4 '�""��'-:;"-=� PP.. . Facilities &Operations Ctr Gary Dei Rosario Office of tl�e Executive Director City of Renton 300 SW 7t Street Economic Development, Neighborhoods Renton, WA 98055 and Strategic Planning Phone: (425) 430-6597 Maplewood_ENVCHLST.DOC ! � Crty of Renfon Environmenta/Checklist Non-Project:Zoning of fhe Proposed Maplewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 2 of i 1 4. Date checklist prepared: December 14, 2001 5. Agency requesting checklisf: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Completion of annexation and adoption of zoning anticipated for the second quarter of 2002. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Annexation of the subject property. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. King County Comprehensive Plan Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Draft, Final and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Approval of the annexation of the subject properties is pending. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that wil/ be needed for your proposal, if known. Adoption of zoning ordinance by the Renton City Council. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposed non-project action is the adoption of City of Renton R-5 zoning for the property included in the proposed Maplewood Heights Elementary Annexation. City of Renton zoning would supplant existing King County R-4 zoning, with annexation of the subject property. 12. LOCat1011 Of tI18 p!'OpOSaI. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal wou/d occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan, vicinity map,and topographic map,if reasonab/y availab/e. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit appfications related to this checklist. The subject area is the Maplewood Heights Elementary School parcel and adjacent right- of-way to the south. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rollinp, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Less than 25%. c. What general fypes of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify fhem and note any prime farmland. Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC , . Ciry of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Project:Zoning of the Proposed Maplewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 3 of 11 Aiderwood (AgC) gravelly sandy loam (USDA Soii Conservation Service, 1972). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. The City's Critical Areas Inventory maps show no geologic hazards for the subject area. e. Describe fhe purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. N/A. This is a non-project action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. The proposal is a nonproject action. The site currently holds an elementary school. No development is anticipated in the future g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? N/A. This is a non-project action. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. 2. A/R a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. N/A. This is a non-project action. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? !f so, generally describe. N/A. This is a non-project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A. This is a non-project action. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of fhe site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. The City's critical areas map inventory does not show any. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent fo (within 200 feet) the descr�bed wafers? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. N/A. This is a non-project action. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A. This is a nonproject action. Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC r � City of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Project:Zoning of the Proposed Maplewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 4 of 11 4) Will fhe proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A. This is a nonproject action. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No portion of the subject area is mapped as 100-year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of wasfe materials fo su►face Wat2Ps? If so,describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. N/A. This is a nonproject action. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give genera/description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. N/A. This is a nonproject action. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, If al7y(for examp/e: Domestic sewage;industrial, containing the following chemicals...;agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. N/A. This is a nonproject action. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. N/A. This is a nonproject action. 2) Could wasfe material enter ground or surface waters? !f so, generally describe. N/A. This is a nonproject action. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. Potential impacts that may result from specific development proposals should be assessed and mitigations proposed through the application process. Future development under the proposed zoning would be required to comply with City of Renton Drainage Standards (RMC 4-6-030) 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous free:alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree:fir, cedar,pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC Ciry of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Pro%ect:Zoning of the Proposed Maplewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 5 of i 1 X wet soil plants:cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NA. This is a nonproject action. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known at this time. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known fo be on or near the site: Unknown. Portions of the subject area are undeveloped and may provide habitat to a variety of wildlife species. Birds:hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals:deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish:bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain The entire State of Washington is included within a migration route for birds, known as the Pacific Flyway. This flyway, as it overlies Renton, is used by a variety of migratory birds, including, but not limited to,the Canada Goose. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. NA. This is a nonproject action. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NA. This is a nonproject action. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC r � City of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Project:Zoning of the Proposed Maplewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 6 of 11 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmenfal health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. N/A. This is a nonproject action. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A. This is a nonproject action. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in fhe area which may affect your project (for example:traffic, equipment, operation, other)? This is a nonproject action. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-ferm or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. This is a nonproject action. Existing noise from the elementary school would not expect to change from this non project action 3) Proposed measures fo reduce or control noise impacts, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The subject area includes the Maplewood Heights Elementary School. Adjacent properties are predominantly residential and/or vacant. b. Has the site 6een used for agriculture? !f so, describe. No indication of agricultural uses on the site. c. Describe any structures on the site. One school and related buildings. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N/A. This is a non-project action. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current classification is King County's R-4 Zone. f. Whaf is fhe current comprehensive plan designation of the site? King County: Urban Residential -4 to 12 units per acre. City of Renton: Residential Single Family. g. If applicable, whaf is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Maplewoocl ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmenta/Checklist Non-Projecf:Zoning of the Proposed Maplewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 7 of 11 N/A. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"area? If so, specify. Unknown. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The number of people would not be expected to change due to this non-project action. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N/A. This is a nonproject action. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. l. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed R-5 zoning is consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and applicable policies. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A. This is a nonproject action. A elementary school currently exists on the property. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A. This is a nonproject action. A elementary school currently exists on the property. c. Proposed measures to reduce or confrol housing impacts, if any: N/A. This is a non-project action. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; , what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed. This is a nonproject action. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N/A. This is a nonproject action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or confrol aesfhetic impacts, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will fhe proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N/A. This is a nonproject action. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC J . City of Renfon Environmental Checklist Non-Project:Zoning of the Proposed Maplewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 8 of 11 N/A. This is a nonproject action. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A. This is a nonproject action. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? School playground. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The proposal is a nonproject action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A. This is a nonproject action. 13. H/STORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or ne� to the site? If so, generally describe. None known or identified in the 1983 King County Newcastle Community Plan. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known or identified in the 1983 King County Newcastle Community Plan. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A. This is a non-project action. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the exisfing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The subject parcel is served by 144th Ave SE and SE 136th St. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate disfance fo the nearest fransit stop? Unknown. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A. This is a nonproject action. d. Wil! the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements fo existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? N/A. This is a nonproject action. Future development under the proposed zoning will likely require the construction of new public and/or private streets and improvements to existing streets. Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Pro%ect:Zoning of fhe Proposed Maplewood Heights Annexation December 14,2001 Page 9 of 11 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so,generally describe. N/A. The proposal is a nonproject action. No water, rail or air transportation facilities are in the vicinity of the subject properties. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? !f known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. NA. This is a nonproject action. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NA. This is a nonproject action. Transportation impacts are assessed and mitigation measures applied with review of specific development projects. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Such services may include, but would not be limited to, fire protection and police protection. This nonproject action would bring the Renton School District's Maplewood Heights Elementary school into the City. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A. This is a non-project action. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Unknown. b. . Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. NA. This is a nonproject action. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclos e on my part. Proponenf: Name Printed: ��Y �� Date: 1Z��bl Maplewood ENVCHLST.DOC City of Renton Environmentai Checklist Non-Project:Zoning of the Proposed Maplewood Heights Annexafion December 14,2001 Page 10 of 11 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACT/ONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do nof need to fill ouf these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environmeni. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensify or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to wafer; emissions to air; producfion, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposal would not significantly alter the existing range of uses aliowed nor the current maximum zoned density and therefore is not anticipated to increase the potential level of these emissions. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: None proposed. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? No significant impacts to plants, animals, fish or marine life are anticipated to occur as a consequence of the proposed zoning action. The proposal would supplant existing single family density residential zoning with similar zoning. Therefore, the potential impacts to plants, animals, fish and marine life is anticipated to be comparable under existing and proposed zoning. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None proposed. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? No significant depletion of energy or natural resources is anticipated to result from the proposal. Residential development that may occur under the proposed zoning would be comparable to that allowed under existing zoning. Energy and natural resources required to construct and maintain single family development may be depleted at about the same rate under either existing or proposed zoning. Proposed measures fo protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None proposed. 4. How would fhe proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated(or eligible or under study) for governmental protecfion; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threafened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Protection of environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated for governmental protection would not change under this proposal. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None proposed. Mapfewood ENVCHLST.DOC Ciry of Renton Environmental Checklist Non-Projech Zonin of the Proposed Maplewood Heights Annezation December 14,2001 Page 11 of 17 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposal would not affect shoreline use. The proposed R-5 zoning implements the Residential Single Family Land Use designation mapped for the subject area in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The range of allowed uses under both existing and proposed zoning are substantially the same— residential or compatible uses. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None proposed. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportafion or public services and utilities? The proposal is not expected to significantly increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities, since the existing and proposed zoning is similar in terms of potential density and range of land uses. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: None proposed. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No conflicts with local, state or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment are known. S/GNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. —_ � Proponent: Name Printed: Ut��r ��(�i� oate: 1 Z�l7/bl Maplewood ENVCNLST.DOC . � �. - MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY ANNEXATION &ZONING/LUA01-120 PARTIES OF RECORD Joe & Debbi Bardsley 13309 146�h Ave. SE Renton, WA 98059 425-687-0506 01/03/02 Last printed 01/03/02 1:17 PM